OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Santa Clara Valley Integrated Environmental Management Project
July 1986
John R. Froines, Ph.D.
Harlan Rotblatt, B.A.
Cornelia Dellenbaugh, M.P.H.
Jessie Schnell, M.P.H.
Mitchell Shandling, B.A.
Jacqueline Nowell, M.P.H.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Sunrnary v
List of Figures xlii
Lost of Tables xliii
List of Appendices xlv
Glossary of Acronyms xlvi
Glossary of Measurement Abbreviations xlvii
1. Introduction 1
2. Regulatory and Resource Agencies Related to Occupational Exposure 2
2.1 Introduction 2
2.2 Federal OSHA 2
2.2.1 Functions of OSHA 3
2.2.1.1 Enforcement 3
2.2.1.2 Standards 4
2.2.1.3 Education and Consultation 7
2.2.2 State Plans 7
2.3 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 8
2.3.1 On-Site Investigations 8
2.3.2 Collection of Data on Hazards Present in U.S. Industries 9
2.3.2.1 Current Intelligence System 10
2.3.2.2 Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances ... 10
2.3.2.3 Literature Searches 10
2.3.2.4 Hazard Surveys 10
2.3.3 Development of Methods for Mcnitoring Exposures and Testing
Protective Equipment 10
2.3.4 Research and Standards Recommendations 11
2.3.5 Education of Industrial Hygienists and other Occupational
Safety and Health Professionals 11
2.4 Environment^ Protection Agency 11
2.5 CAL/OSHA 12
2.5.1 Components of the CAL/OSHA Program 13
2.5.1.1 CAL/OSHA Program Office 13
2.5.1.2 Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board 13
2.5.1.3 Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) .. 13
2.5.1.4 Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board 19
-------
2.5.1.5 CAI/OSHA Consultation Service 19
2.5.1.6 Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service
(HESIS) 20
2.5.1.7 Northern and Southern Occupational Health Centers .. 20
2.5.1.8 Air and Industrial Hygiene laboratory .. 21
2.5.2 CM/OSHA Compliance Activity in Santa dara County 21
2.5.2.1 Basis of Field Office Inspections 22
2.5.2.2 Hew Inspections are Performed 22
2.5.2.3 Violations and Penalties 22
2.6 California Division of ]>h"r statistics and Research (DLSR) 25
2.6.1 U.S. Bureau of labor Statistics Annual Survey 25
2.6.2 Etrployer's Report of Occupational Injury or Illness 26
2.6.3 Doctor's First Report of Occupational Injury or Tllnpss 28
2.7 California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) 29
2.7.1 Pesticide Use and Illness Surveillance 29
2.7.2 Health Effects Information 29
2.7.3 Investigation and Enforcement ' 30
2.8 California Department of Health Services (DOHS) 30
2.8.1 Epidemiological Studies Section 30
2.3.2 Resource for Cancer Epidemiology 31
2.8.3 Radiological Health Branch 31
2.8.4 Toxic Substances Control Division 31
2.8.5 The Petris Bill (SB 495) 31
2.9 California Workers Compensation System 32
2.10 Local Agencies, Organizations, and Regulations 33
2.10.1 Santa dara County Department of Health 33
2.10.2 Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office 33
2.10.3 Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances 33
2.10.4 SCOOSH 35
2.10.5 Valley Health Center 35
3. Measurement and Evaluation of Occupational Exposures 36
3.1 Introduction . 36
3.2 Standards ..... 36
3.2.1 Authority 36
3.2.2 Terminology 37
3.2.3 Process of Standards Development 33
3.3.4 Differences Between State and Federal Standards 38
3.3.5 Factors in Developing a Standard 39
-11-
-------
3.3 Measurement of Occupational Exposures 40
3.3.1 EnviLumfcintal Monitoring 40
3.3.2 Biological Monitoring 42
3.3.2.1 Definition auii Purpose 42
3.3.2.2 Advantages and Limitations . 42
3.3.2.3 Most Canincn Specimens 43
4. Occupational Hazards in Santa dara County 45
4.1 Introduction 45
4.2 Methods 46
4.2.1 Problems in Data Collection 47
4.2.2 Data Sources 47
4.2.3 Methods for Ranking Industry by Potential Exposure 48
4.2.3.1 NIOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI) 48
4.2.3.2 CSHA Weighted Index Ranking (OWI) 49
4.2.3.3 Industry Rankings Based on Actual Exposure
Information: The Inspection-Based Industry
Ranking (IBER) 49
4.2.3.4 Comparison of Results of NICSVIRI and QSHA OWI
Ranking Systems 52
4.2.4 Use of the IBER System for Industrial Ranking 52
4.2.5 Employment Characteristics for Santa Clara County 56
4.3 Results 56
4.3.1 Analysis of Employment Characteristics for Santa Clara
County 56
4.3.2 Industry Ranking Results 56
4.3.2.1 IBER Ranking Results 56
4.3.2.2 IRI and OWI Rankings for Santa dara County 65
4.3.2.3 Overlap Among IRI, OWI and IBER 73
4.3.2.4 CAI/OSHA. Compliance Information 74
4.3.2.5 Summary of Approaches to Industry Ranking 74
4.4 Conclusions Based on Ranking 76
4.5 Discussion 84
4.5.1 Intervention 84
4.5.2 Tracking of Exposures Over Time 84
4.5.3 Planning 85
4.5.4 Research 85
4.5.5 Complement to Disease Surveillance 85
4.5.6 Standard Setting 85
-111-
-------
5. Industry Prof lies 87
5.1 Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674) . 33
5.2 Electronic Conponents (SIC 3679) 118
5.3 Miscellaneous Plastics Products (SIC 3079) 139
5.4 Electroplating (SIC 3471) ... 147
5.5 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (SIC 8062). 153
5.6 FMC Corporation (Military Vehicle Manufacture) 158
6. Recommendations 162
-iv-
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. Background
This report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of contract number
68-01-7002 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The report represents an
assessment of available information on occupational exposures within Santa Clara
County, California, and was conducted as a companion piece to the first phase of EPA's
Integrated Environmental Management Project (IEMP). The IEMP is a broad assessment of
health risks from "toxic pollutants", and of methods to manage those risks.
The decision to assess workplace exposures within the Santa Clara Valley was made
by the lEMP's Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee and Public Advisory Committee.
The purpose of the work is to provide a context for the environmental risk findings
which the IEMP is developing in Santa Clara County, and to provide local elected offi-
cials and other interested parties with a means of tying the two sets of issues (envi-
ronmental and occupational) together. Based on a preliminary assessment of the type
and quality of available data, the IEMP, in consultation with its advisory committees,
concluded that this study should focus on qualitative analysis of occupational expo-
sures and risks, rather than a quantitative risk assessment within that context.
Thus, the report identifies types of toxic exposures in Santa Clara County work-
places and compares the relative magnitude of such exposures among industries. In
addition, the report reviews the framework for monitoring and regulating occupational
exposures in the county. The report does not, however, attempt to quantify the health
risks associated with identified exposures, nor does it attempt to calculate the pro-
portion of overall risk from toxic exposures in the County contributed by occupational
sources.
2. Structure of the Report
In keeping with the guidelines set forth by the IEMP, the report encompasses the
following subject matter
a. Descriptions of federal, state, and local agencies responsible for analyzing
workplace exposures, and for setting and enforcing standards (Section 2);
b. Discussion of the means for measuring and evaluating occupational exposures,
including review of standards-setting procedures, standards provisions, and
methods of exposure monitoring (Section 3);
c. Qualitative discussion of the substances to which workers in Santa Clara
County industries may be exposed, and the possible order of magnitude of those
exposures (Section 4);
d. Profiles of selected industries deemed important to a consideration of occupa-
tional health in Santa Clara County (Section 5); and
e. Recommendations for further possible research or action by appropriate
agencies (Section 6).
-v-
-------
The discussions of occupational health-related agencies in Santa Clara County
(Section 2) and measurement and evaluation techniques (Section 3) are essentially
descriptive, prepared from interviews with appropriate agency personnel and review of
written source material. However, the ability of local agencies to help analyze and
control occupational hazards was an important focus in our investigations and has
bearing on the recommendations we have made. Therefore, a summary of findings
pertaining to local agencies and occupational health is given below. The balance of
the executive summary is given to discussion of occupational hazards in Santa Clara
County, as presented in Sections 4 and 5 of the report.
3. Occupational Health in Santa Clara County: the Local Context.
Among the guidelines given by IEMP was that the report include an analysis of
local resources available to identify and manage occupational hazards or illnesses in
the county. Presented below are brief descriptions of key agencies or data systems
relevant to occupational health in Santa Clara County which are based in the county.
(Section 2 and Appendix 10 of the report give a more comprehensive picture of such
agencies statewide.)
3.1 Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH, part of the CAL/OSHA Program)
DOSH is a state agency responsible for inspecting workplaces to ascertain their
compliance with CAL/OSHA occupational health and safety standards. The local DOSH
office is the governmental agency most directly concerned with occupational health in
the county. The DOSH office for Santa Clara County (as well as Santa Cruz, San
Bonito, and Monterey Counties) is the Region I District 2 office located in San Jose.
As of March, 1986, this office was staffed by four industrial hygienists, with a fifth
due to be added in the near future. According to the state staffing formula for occu-
pational health inspectors (industrial hygienists), based on complaint volume, the
Region I District 2 office was entitled to six industrial hygienists, but DOSH offi-
cials did not know as of March 1986 whether or not a sixth industrial hygienist would
eventually be added.
In fiscal year 1983, the San Jose office conducted 119 total industrial hygiene
inspections, 59 of which resulted in the issuance of a citation or information memo-
randum. In fiscal year 1984, the office conducted a total of 134 industrial hygiene
inspections, 52 of which resulted in a citation or information memorandum. In both
years, approximately 60-75% of the inspections were in Santa Clara County. Thus, in
fiscal year 1983, between approximately 72 and 90 industrial hygiene inspections took
place in Santa Clara County; and in fiscal year 1984, this total was between 80 and
100. Exact figures were not available from the District Office. (Computerized data
from the DOSH Management Information Unit (MIU) were obtained for fiscal years
1979-84, but inconsistencies in these data made them unsuitable for inclusion in this
report.)
3.2 Santa Clara County Health Department
The regulation of occupational exposures by the County Health Department is pres-
ently severely limited. The Department's Section of Occupational Health (formerly
-vi-
-------
referred to as Division of Occupational Health), once staffed by two chemists, three
industrial hygienists, a physician, a nursing consultant, and a director in the early
seventies, is currently staffed by a single chemist. The Section has been allocated
one industrial hygienist position, which is vacant. Medical records and reports com-
piled in the 20 years of the Section's existence are in hard copy files only: nothing
has been computerized.
Some activities relevant to occupational health are currently performed by the
Office of Hazardous Materials in the Department's Environmental Health Services Divi-
sion. This unit performs air monitoring for other county agencies on request of those
agencies. The Division does not at present respond to monitoring requests from the
public. The Office of Hazardous Materials also administers the Hazardous Materials
Storage Ordinance for the county (see below).
3.3 The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances
Santa Clara County in 1983 passed a Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance requir-
ing any party storing hazardous materials to obtain and keep a current hazardous mate-
rials storage permit from the county. All major municipalities in the county have
passed identical ordinances, administered by local fire departments. Provisions of the
ordinance concerning materials regulated, the Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement
(HMIS), the Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP) and inspections and records are
relevant to the identification of potential occupational exposures.
Both the HMIS and the monitoring log kept in accordance with the HMMP hold promise
as tools for occupational hazard surveillance, insofar as they identify names and gen-
eral quantities of toxic substances in use in a particular plant or industry in the
county. However, use of Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances data to identify
hazardous workplaces is disappointingly limited at present, due to incomplete report-
ing and computerization. Failure to include Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
code information in the HMIS requirements, decentralized record-keeping, and limited
computer capability of some municipalities all hamper use of these data for industry-
wide surveillance, and make them more suitable for identifying hazards used in indi-
vidual firms.
The County currently has plans to compile a centralized inventory of hazardous
material users in the county, derived from municipal data from Hazardous Materials
Storage Ordinances, and from data to be collected in compliance with AB 2185 (the
Waters Bill). (This bill requires the County to develop an inventory of facilities
using hazardous materials to create area emergency response plans.) This central
inventory would be maintained by the County Health Department's Office of Hazardous
Materials. The specific form and content of this database have not yet been deter-
mined. The inventory will not be completed before 1987, and a precise timetable for
completion has not been established.
The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances also give the county and municipalities
the right, at their discretion, to conduct inspections to ascertain compliance with
the ordinance. (Annual inspections will be mandatory to assure compliance with AB
2185.) Examination of inspection records for violations may indicate firms with
potential occupational exposures either due to direct employee exposure from storage
leaks, or by suggesting a bad actor firm, i.e. a firm whose bad record in hazardous
materials storage might indicate similar negligence in employee exposure.
-vii-
-------
3.4 The Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office.
The Agricultural Commissioner's Office investigates occupational exposures to pes-
ticides in Santa Clara County. The Commissioner receives pesticide use reports from
local companies and agencies, and pesticide illness reports from the County Health
Officer (who receives them from physicians), and investigates all reported cases of
pesticide-related illness resulting from use, handling, mixing, loading or residues of
pesticides. (Illnesses resulting from the manufacture of pesticides are investigated
by the DOSH San Jose office.) In 1984, there were 27 physician-reported pesticide-
related illnesses in Santa Clara County, 6 of which were agriculturally related.
3.5 Valley Health Center
The Valley Health Center, part of the county hospital in San Jose (the Valley Med-
ical Center) currently operates an occupational medicine clinic. The clinic is
staffed by one occupational health physician, and one occupational health nurse. Coop-
eration between this clinic and the County Department of Health could conceivably
enhance local surveillance of manifest occupational disease.
3.6 Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan of Northern California
Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan of Northern California is a comprehensive health
plan with centralized computer data bases. In 1978, Kaiser conducted a pilot study of
cancer rates among specific occupational groups in its membership. This study was
performed primarily to test the research technique, and did not generate clear-cut
results. No report was produced from the study. This type of study, however, is a
potentially valuable tool for identifying illness patterns by occupation and industry.
Kaiser and other comprehensive health plans with members in Santa Clara County offer
excellent study populations, insofar as their data systems are extensive and central-
ized, their membership is largely employment based (i.e. members join through their
employer), and members remain in the health plan over long periods of time. The
County Health Department could conceivably encourage, support, and coordinate such
studies.
4. Occupational Hazards in Santa Clara County: Methods, Results, and Discussion.
4.1 Overview
Sources of occupational hazard in Santa Clara County were assessed by type of
industry: our aim was to identify those industries in the county which pose the great-
est potential for occupational health problems. We have framed our analysis in terms
of "potential" problems due to our use of exposure data (in contrast to disease data)
projected for the county from national data bases. To be consistent with other parts
of the IEMP, we restricted our assessment to hazards from chemical exposures only, and
did not consider physical or psychological hazards.
-viii-
-------
Our main approach to identifying occupational hazards in the county was to compare
industries by employment in the county, potential exposures, and actual exposures,
using national exposure data obtained from the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH). These data were the only computerized sources on potential or actual expo-
sures to toxic substances available for the entire spectrum of industry represented in
Santa Clara County.
Data from the computerized sources were evaluated using three distinct methods,
two of which analyzed potential exposures, and one of which analyzed actual past expo-
sures. Because these methods emphasize different factors in comparing industry
hazards, they offer in their collective application a more comprehensive understanding
of such hazards than have been achieved through a single analytic approach. Based on
each of these assessments, we then ranked industries in order of relative hazardous-
ness, as determined by each method.
Within the limitations of the data bases, these rankings represent meaningful
methods for identifying potentially hazardous industries. The approaches taken to
establishing a relative ranking derive from the view that the most hazardous indus-
tries are those with the greatest number of workers exposed to the highest levels of
the most hazardous agents. For purposes of this report, we believe that measures of
actual exposure (i.e., data derived from the OSHA MIS, described below) are less sub-
ject to error than potential exposure data derived from the NOHS data base.
Ranking of industry in a county such as Santa Clara which is reasonably unique
relative to other industrial areas in the U.S. is worrisome, especially where the data
to be used are drawn from a very different cross-section (i.e., from federal data).
However, given the total lack of exposure data at the state and local level, we
believe that the approach taken here is the only reasonable approach available.
From our analysis of industry exposure hazards and the resultant industry rankings
we designated 67 industries as "potentially hazardous Santa Clara County industries."
Included in this list were industries with significant Santa Clara County employees
(i.e., over 300 employees) which ranked in the top 20% in any of the three ranking
systems. Also included in the list were industries which did not rank among the most
hazardous industries, but which had a record of actual high exposures to specific
hazardous chemicals. Two industries, hospitals and semiconductor manufacturers, were
included in the list due to special features of these industries and their high
employment levels in the county.
In addition to comparing industries by computerized data sources, we also reviewed
all documented violations of exposure standards by Santa Clara County firms from
1979-1984, as disclosed by CAL/OSHA inspection records. The utility of these records
to identify firms or industries which pose exposure problems is severely limited, how-
ever, and hence these data were not incorporated into industry comparisons.
Finally, based on the analysis of employment and exposure patterns, we selected
six industries for more detailed discussion. Profiles of these industries (Section 5
of the report) draw upon information which, due to lack of suitable computerization,
we were unable to use for the overall industry comparisons. This information includes
cases of occupational disease, actual exposure levels found in Santa Clara County
firms by CAL/OSHA, and exposures found by NIOSH in inspections of firms in California
and other states.
-ix-
-------
A more detailed discussion of analytic methods and results follows below. Results
of the six industry profiles are given in Section 4.1.4 of this Summary.
4.2 Identification of Hazardous Industries by Computerized Data Bases
4.2.1 Criteria for Identifying Hazardous Industries
As noted above, the principal approach to occupational exposure hazards in Santa
Clara County used for this report was to compare the full range of industries in the
county according to the following criteria:
a) Industry size in Santa Clara County. Industry size is characterized by the
number of persons employed in a given 4-digit Standard Industrial Classifica-
tion Code (SIC). The distribution of employees within a SIC was also consid-
ered important. For example, a SIC with total employment of 1,000 may include
10 facilities of 100 persons each or 1 facility employing a 1,000 persons.
b) Potential exposure to a significant number of highly toxic agents. Potential
exposure denotes the presence of the toxic agents in the industry, and incorporates
calculation of the number of workers likely to encounter the substance.
c) Documented high exposure to multiple agents which have significant toxicitv.
Documented exposure denotes actual measurements of worker exposure using
industrial hygiene techniques.
4.2.2 Data Sources.
To obtain the above information and develop industry rankings, the following com-
puterized data sources were used. Industry size and employment demographics were
evaluated using the NIOSH Industrial File for Santa Clara County. This file contains
a listing of all Santa Clara County employers registered with Dun's Marketing Ser-
vices, and is the most comprehensive non-confidential listing of employers available.
The file lacks only public employment sites and those few companies not registered
with Dun's Marketing Services (small establishments with no need to set up credit for
buying supplies, and a few large companies who never deal with public financial insti-
tutions). The file is current to September 1983.
Though the NIOSH Industrial File is the best available source of company and
employment distribution among industries, it contains inaccuracies. The primary dis-
crepancies include: listings of companies which have ceased operation or moved to
another location, incorrect number of employees, and inappropriate SIC code designa-
tions. Inaccurate SIC code designation can have significant implications when attemp-
ting to set priorities, e.g., compliance programming, and intervention strategies.
For example, SIC 3341, secondary lead smelting, the most potentially hazardous indus-
try in the IBER industry ranking system (described below), has 4 establishments with
80 employees in SIC 3341 in Santa Clara County according to the NIOSH Industrial File.
A telephone check of the 4 establishments identified in the NIOSH file indicated that
they did not actually conduct manufacturing in Santa Clara County as designated by
this SIC.
-x-
-------
Documented exposures to toxic agents were obtained from the federal OSHA Manage-
ment Information System (MIS') inspection Files. These files contain actual measured
worker exposures sampled by federal OSHA during workplace inspections. These data
reflect federal OSHA inspection patterns, i.e., they are derived predominantly from
states which, unlike California, do not administer their own occupational health and
safety programs. While it would be preferable to use state or local data, federal OSHA
inspection records are the only substantial body of compiled data on actual exposures.
These records give precise levels of exposure but they are subject to certain biases.
For example, inspections are not random: they are based largely on complaints. There-
fore, some industries are more frequently inspected than others. Moreover, inspec-
tions are targeted to search for the worst exposures in an industry, not a distribution of
all the exposures. For the purposes of ranking industries with the greatest potential for
occupational health problems, however, this targeting may not represent a major problem.
The OSHA MIS data used in this report covered almost four years of OSHA inspections
(1979-1982), comprising approximately 15,000 inspections and 60,000 test (exposure) samples
from 475 SICs.
Potential exposures to toxic substances were obtained from the NTOSH National
Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS). a national survey of about 5,000 establishments.
The NOHS compiled exhaustive lists of substances found in a systematic random sample
of industries, and estimated the number of workers exposed. NOHS made no measurements
of actual exposures however. Therefore, the presence of the chemicals in an industry
represented potential exposures only. To compensate for the lack of direct sampling,
NOHS did record whether exposure was subject to engineering controls or personal pro-
tective equipment was required and whether potential exposure to workers was full-time
or part-time. The NOHS was conducted from 1972 - -1974.
These three sources — the NIOSH Industrial File current to September 1983, the
OSHA MIS Inspection Files 1979-82, and the NIOSH NOHS completed 1974 — form the basis
for Industry hazard rankings in this report.
4.2.3 Problems in Data Collection.
Though the three data sources used in ranking industries allow a compelling
assessment of potential occupational health problems in Santa Clara County, other data
would have enhanced this assessment. Where problems were encountered in developing data
on chemical exposure and industry demographics, they were due in most part to one of
two general situations -- either the desired data were not available, or in some way
their applicability was limited. There were three reasons for data not being avail-
able. These include: a) the desired information had not been gathered at all; b) it
had been gathered without the advantage of computerization and/or tabulation' or c) it
was gathered under the auspices of an agency which held the data confidential.
Specific examples of data sources reviewed for incorporation in industry rankings
but which suffered from problems of availability or application include the following:'
a) The NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES). The NOES is an updated
national survey recently completed by NIOSH, similar to the NOHS of 1974-1976
The NOES will have limited usefulness until the chemical identities of trade
name products are made known in 1987 or 1988. Therefore, the NOES could not
be used in this report to rank industries.
-xi-
-------
b) CAL/OSHA compliance information. Data derived from actual inspections in
Santa Clara County and/or California may have utility in ranking of indus-
tries. Unfortunately, CAL/OSHA compliance data are not computerized. Each
case file must be reviewed individually and exposure painstakingly extracted
by hand if CAL/OSHA information is to be used in assessing the occupational
health problems in Santa Clara County. It was therefore not practical in the
scope of this research to employ CAL/OSHA exposure data in industry rankings.
c) NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations, Industry Wide Studies, Criteria Documents and
Control Technology studies. These studies are performed by NIOSH on its own
initiative or by request, and include exposure monitoring. This information
is also not computerized and, though valuable, is in general more limited in
scope than the federal OSHA MIS inspection data used in the report.
d) Environmental monitoring conducted by individual companies or their insurance
carriers. With the exception of some data provided by representatives from
the semiconductor manufacturing industry, exposure information from environ-
mental monitoring programs conducted by businesses or their insurance carriers
was not available for review and evaluation.
e) Inventories of firms using hazardous materials, maintained under Municipal
Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. These data were poorly computerized,
and even computerized tabulations lacked important information, particularly
SIC codes.
f) Disease reporting systems maintained by the California Division of Labor Stat-
istics and Research (DLSR). Though the three occupational disease reporting
systems kept by DLSR are as extensive and detailed as any existing in the
nation, most tabulations are insufficiently precise (i.e. are not for 4-digit
SIC codes), and do not capture chronic conditions. These data were therefore
felt to be unsuitable for general industry comparisons, though they are pre-
sented in part in the six industry profiles.
g) Occupational data. Because toxic exposures can vary significantly among dif-
ferent jobs in the same industry or plant, analysis by occupation is a desir-
able complement to analysis by industry. The Employment Development Depart-
ment (EDD) of the State of California maintains an industry-occupation matrix.
Unfortunately, for purposes of this research, it is highly confidential (that
is, restricted to EDD use only). A data tape was obtained which listed fed-
eral Occupational Employment Survey (OES) estimates of employment patterns by
SIC. Lack of numeric coding of occupational titles precluded using this tape
to construct an industry-occupation matrix for this report.
4.2.4 Methods for Ranking Potentially Hazardous Industries.
Three methods were used to analyze the above data bases and rank industries by
exposure hazard. These were a) the NTOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI). b) the OSHA
Weighted Index (Own, and c) the Inspection Based Exposure Ranking (TBER). The IRI
and OWI systems are both based on the NIOSH National Occupational Hazard Survey, and
thus reflect potential exposures to toxic substances identified in given industries by
the survey. The IBER system, in contrast, is based upon OSHA MIS inspection files of
1979-82, and reflects actual exposures in given industries. As noted, all three sys-
tems are based on federal data. Rankings generated by these systems must therefore be
-xii-
-------
understood as projections made for the county, and not as direct measures of hazardous
exposure in Santa Clara County firms.
4.2.4.1 NIOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI)
This system was developed by NIOSH as an instrument to target the most hazardous
industries for research. To determine a relative ranking of SIC codes, NOHS data is
first used to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular substance in a
given industry. The result is weighted by a hazard rating for each substance present
based on detailed information in the Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances
(RTECS). The IRI considers over 1700 chemicals in ranking industries. In estimating
worker exposures, the IRI gives full-time exposures twice the weight of part-time
exposures, and assumes that controls reduce exposure by 90%.
The IRI system emphasizes SICs where there is widespread exposure to highly potent
chemicals and no use of controls. The IRI also highlights SIC groups with very large
numbers of potent substances. For example, manufacture of paints, where there are
hundreds of very hazardous chemicals, ranks 4th on IRI.
4.2.4.2 OSHA Weighted Index Ranking (OWI).
To develop inspection priorities, federal OSHA used NOHS to design a 'Weighted
Index' (OWI) by SIC code. This system is currently not in use by federal or State
OSHA programs. There are significant differences between this index and the IRI:
only chemicals regulated, by OSHA are included and there is no correction for whether
controls are in place;, because OSHA must also inspect controlled exposures. Though
OWI, like IRI, uses NOHS data to estimate exposures, OWI gives full-time exposures
five times the weight of part-time exposures.
To assess a chemical's toxic potency, OSHA developed a simple 1, 3, 7, 10 rating
scale, with 10 being the most serious.
OWI rankings emphasize workplaces with high numbers of full-time exposures to
large numbers of chemicals. An industry must have multiple exposures in order to be
high in the OWI ranking: no SICs in the top twenty-five of the OWI have fewer than 90
chemicals listed.
4.2.4.3 Industry Rankings Based on Actual Exposure Information: The Inspection-Based
Industry Ranking (IBERs).
We developed the IBER ranking system using federal OSHA MIS compliance data from
1979-82. SICs with fewer than three inspections in the time period analyzed were eli-
minated to ensure adequate assessment of the SICs hazards.
Some general limitations of the OSHA MIS data were noted above, including poten-
tial bias toward certain industries. An additional problem arises in applying those
data to Santa Clara County. In evaluating OSHA MIS exposure data, it is appropriate
to use OSHA PEL's (Permissible Exposure Limits) as measures of the severity of expo-
sure, because these were the limits which the firms being inspected were required to
observe. However, a substantial number of CAL/OSHA standards are stricter than federal
OSHA standards, and this may have an impact on exposure levels for those chemicals in
-Kill-
-------
California for those chemicals in California plants. Moreover, CAL/OSHA regulates
well over 100 substances for which no corresponding federal standard exists. Whether
differences in geographical location, age of the industry, and other factors are
important variables which would affect both the actual exposure levels and the rela-
tive ranking of industries remains to be determined. Until the State of California
computerizes its compliance data or obtains environmental monitoring data from compa-
nies, these questions cannot be resolved. For the purpose of this report, we must
assume that the national rankings have relevance to the local situation.
It must be added that, even with respect to the more stringent and extensive Cali-
fornia standards, there are cases where these standards may not appear to be adequate,
especially in poorly studied industrial settings or where the standard is based on
obsolete or inadequate toxicologic testing. In using OSHA inspection data, however, we
were obliged to evaluate exposure severity in terms of the OSHA standards.
To generate IBER industry ranks, we developed a schematic method to summarize the
exposure test sample (monitoring) data from OSHA. There is one record for each time a
substance was inspected in a SIC, denoted as a "substance-inspection unit." Thus, if a
substance was sampled in five inspections in a given SIC, it is counted as five sub-
stance-inspections; if two different substances are sampled in each of five inspec-
tions in a SIC, there are a total of ten substance-inspections. We averaged the test
samples for each substance in an inspection and divided the result by the substance's
federal OSHA PEL to give a "Severity Level" for that substance-inspection unit,
expressed as a percentage of the PEL.
The Severity Levels for each substance found in a SIC were then combined for all
substance-inspection units and a mean and median value calculated for the distribu-
tion. Both values were needed because the distribution of Severity Levels for one
substance within a SIC is almost always highly skewed, thereby yielding different val-
ues for the mean and median.
However, this scheme alone would not take into account the varying number of sub-
stances in a SIC. If the mean or median were calculated without regard to the number
of substances, the values would treat 50 test samples of one substance the same as 5
test samples of 10 different substances. If they were summed without regard to number
of inspections, they would treat one inspection with high exposures the same as 10
inspections with high exposures. A measure was added to address the number of sub-
stance inspections, as well as the number of substances in a SIC and the extent of
exposure. Altogether, four "Inspection-Based Exposure Rating" (IBER) measures were
developed to account for both substances and substance-inspections, as well as the
mean and median Severity Levels. These four IBER variables are:
a) MedSubs - The median of the Severity Levels for all substances-inspection
units multiplied bv the number of unique substances sampled in the SIC.
b) MedSublns - The median of the Severity Levels for all substance-inspection
units multiplied bv the number of substance-inspections for the SIC.
c) MnSubs - The mean of the Severity Levels for all substance-inspection units
multiplied bv the number of unique substances sampled in the SIC.
d) MnSublns - The mean of the Severity Levels for all substance-inspection units
multiplied bv the number of substance-inspect ions for the SIC.
-xiv-
-------
The OSHA OWI four-point (1,3,7,10) hazard weighting system was applied to the
inspection data to weight each substance's frequency of sampling and severity of expo-
sure according to its degree of hazardousness.
In order to use the IBERs to rank SICs, each of the four IBER measures (MedSubs,
MedSublns, MnSubs, MnSublns) was independently calculated, and four lists of the most
hazardous industries (one for each measure) were developed. An overall ranking was
constructed from those four lists, with the lowest total score ranking as #1 or most
hazardous on the overall list. In analyzing industries for these potential impact on
occupational health in Santa Clara County, we considered both this overall ranking,
and the ranking within each of the four separate measures. (Specifically, we consid-
ered the number of measures in which an industry was listed in the top 20%).
4.2.4.4 High Exposure to a Single Substance.
In addition to identifying industries with high IBER rankings, we also used the
OSHA MIS data to identify identified industries with low IBER rankings, but with high
exposure to one specific chemical. Industries which ranked high in IBERS have two
characteristics, namely high exposures to multiple substances. IBER rankings are
weighted toward multiple exposures. Industries which have documented high exposures
but only to a single substance constitute a highly significant exposure problem; -since
there is only a single substance, however, the IBER ranking is low. The criteria for
identifying SICs in this category were a minimum of 3 inspections, a mean severity
level greater than 1.0 (exposure equal to or greater than the PEL), and an IBER rank-
ing higher than 75 (i.e. in the 75 most hazardous overall IBER industries). For
asbestos, a mean severity level of 0.25 was used since it is generally recognized that
the current OSHA standard for asbestos is inadequate. More SICs would have been
included if a lower severity level, e.g. 0.5, were selected.
4.2.5 Industry Rankings: Results
4.2.5.1 Employment characteristics of Santa Clara County (from the NIOSH Industrial
File).
There are 648,000 people employed in the county. Eleven SICs employ more than
10,000 persons each and account for 43.7% of Santa Clara County employment. One
hundred and ten SICs employ more than 1,000 persons each and account for 82.7% of the
county employment. Industries employing more than 300 persons account for 95% of all
Santa Clara County employment.
As anticipated, the electronics industry, including SICs 3573, 3674, 3679, and
3662, is the largest industry in the county. Schools (SICs 8211 and 8221), eating
places (SIC 5812), hospitals (SIC 8062), architectural services (8911), research and
development laboratories (SIC 7391), and guided missiles and space vehicles (SIC
3761), are also large employers, all employing over 10,00 workers. Below 10,000
employees, the types of industries are widely distributed, although there are a sig-
nificant number of firms related to or part of the electronics industry. Within the
top 11 SICs by total employment, there are a large number of small employers but there
are also a significant number of large employers. Large employers in the top 11 SICs
account for 50% of all large employers in the county. In SIC 3761, a single large
-xv-
-------
employer (Lockheed Missile and Space Company) accounts for virtually all the employ-
ment.
4.2.5.2 High IBER-OWI-IRI ranking.
A significant number of industries have been identified as ranking high in one of
these systems.
Executive Summary Table 1 lists those industries ordered by SIC code which we cal-
culate have the greatest potential for significant exposures to workplace chemicals in
Santa Clara County. No SIC on this list is documented to have problems in Santa Clara
County, so the list should not be perceived as an indictment of a SIC. The industries
on this list, however, are either known to have a large number of toxic chemicals in
use or "have a history of high exposures to particular substances as measured in
national surveys.
The SICs listed in Executive Summary Table 1 all employ 300 persons or more in the
county. (Industries employing more than 300 persons constitutes 95% of the employment
in the county.) Industries employing fewer than 300 persons were excluded in order to
limit the number of industries for further follow-up and analysis. Industries
employing fewer than 300 persons but which rank high on IBERs certainly also deserve
further evaluation (these industries are identified in the report.
A high IBER ranking required that a SIC be in the top 20% of at least three of the
four IBER ranks. Industries high on the OWI or IRI were those industries employing
more than 300 persons and who were in the top 20% of the respective rankings.
Executive Summary Table 1 lists fifteen SICs as high in the IBER ranking: these
include 1622, 1761, 2086, 2819, 2821, 2879, 3079, 3229, 3312, 3441, 3479, 3499, 5093,
7216, and 7699. There are 39 SICs listed as high in the OWI ranking, and 22 SICs are
listed as high in the IRI ranking.
Many SICs with substantial employment and high rankings in IRI or OWI had low IBER
rankings. It is instructive to contrast two SICs, 3573 (electronic computing) and
3679 (electronic components) since they are large employers in Santa Clara County,
rank in the top 20% of the IRI and OWI respectively, and are low in the IBERS. In
3573 (electronic computing), federal OSHA conducted 27 inspections during the period
1979-82 and sampled for 20 substances. There were no overexposures and the measured
exposures were very low. These data reflect very few inspections and thus must be
viewed with caution, but there is no obvious pattern of overexposure. In 3679 (elec-
tronic components), there was a significantly greater number of inspections, 252, dur-
ing the same period of time and the data indicate that there were occasional overexpo-
sures to nine different toxic substances.
A low IBER ranking does not, therefore, imply that there were nfl overexposures and
that the particular SIC should be eliminated form further consideration. A low rank-
ing may indicate that there was not a systematic pattern of overexposure. SICs ranked
high in the OWI and IRI, 1743, 1752, 1793, 2541, 3511, 3573, 3652, 5084, 5541, 7391,
and 7395, but had no inspection test samples violating an OSHA standard. In many cases
there were few inspections and the potential for exposure cannot be discussed.
-xvi-
-------
Executive Summary Table 1
Industries Ranked Potentially Hazardous In Santa Clara County by Federal
OSHA/NIOSH Data Rases.'
SIC
1542
1611
1622
1623
1629
1711
1721
1731
1743
1752
1761
1791
1793
1739
2086
2434
2541
2751
2752
2819
2821
2834
2879
3079
3229
3312
3441
3444
3469
3471
3479
3499
3511
3544
3545
3559
3561
3569
3573
3599
3652
3662
3674
3679
3769
3811
3999
4932
5081
5084
5093
5511
5541
7216
7349
7391
7394
7395
7397
7399
7538
7539
7699
8021
806?
8071
8072
Nonresldentlal construction, nee.
Highway and street construction.
Bridge, tunnel, and elevated highway.
Water, sewer, and utility lines.
Heavy construction, nee.
Plumbing, heating, air conditioning.
Painting, paper hanging, decorating.
Electrical work.
Terrazzo, tile, marble, mosaic work.
Floor laying and floor work, nee.
Roofing and sheet metal work.
Structural and steel erection.
Glass and glazing work.
Special trade contractors, nee.
Rottled and canned soft drinks.
Wood kitchen cabinets.
Wood partitions and fixtures.
Commercial printing, letterpress.
Commercial printing, lithographic.
Industrial Inorganic chemicals, nee.
Plastics materials and resins.
Phamaceutlcal preparations.
Agricultural chemicals, nee.
Miscellaneous plastics products.
Pressed ft blown glass, nee.
Blast furnaces ft steel mills.
Fabricated structural metal.
Sheet metal work.
Metal stampings, nee.
Plating ft Polishing
Metal coating ft allied services
Fabricated metal products, nee.
Turbines ft Turbine generator sets.
Special dies, tools, digs, ft fixtures.
Machine tool accessories.
Special Industry machinery, nee.
Pumps * pumping equipment.
General Industrial machinery, nee.
Electronic computing equipment.
Machinery, except electrical.
Phonograph records.
Radio 4 TV communication equipment.
Semiconductors ft related devices.
Electronic components nee.
Space vehicle equipment, nee.
Engineering ft scientific Instruments.
Manufacturing Industries, nee.
Gas * other services combined.
Commercial machines ft equipment.
Industrial machinery 1 equipment.
Scrap ft waste materials.
New ft used car dealers.
Gasoline service stations.
Ory cleaning plants, except rug.
Building maintenance services, nee.
Research ft development laboratories.
Equipment rental.
Photoflnlshlng laboratories.
Commercial testing laboratories.
Business services, nee.
General automotive repair shops.
Automotive repair shops.
Repair services, nee.
Office of dentists.
General medical A surgical hospitals.
Medical laboratories.
Dental laboratories.
No of
Fmpl I
1279
96fl
330
770
. 430
4015
1125
1471
323
484
1425
327
376
1334
351
349
318
879
1652
63fi
303
1097
lOOfl
?flflfl
307
394
712
1571
305
1034
660
552
2350
528
384
1017
son
405
70,506
6337
306
73.075
52.187
23,849
465
4680
2375
7307
2943
1123 ,
372 '
7724
753
2645
14,603
1465
1077
1735
7111
1717
71B
1043
770 '
14.27?
46?
360
Ranked High In
h , A ^ec
RFP" nwic I«Jd Chen
•
*
ft
*
* *
ft
*
ft
* *
•
*
* •
*
*
*
• *
* •
•
* *
• *
°
*
*
*
* •
*
• *
•
* •
*
• •
*
•
*
•
*
*
* *
•
*
*
*
•
*
•
• *
•
* • *
*
*
•
a. >30o employees 1n the county.
b. Inspection Rased on Exposure Ratings
c. OSHA Weighted Index
d. Industrial Risk Index
-XVli-
-------
4.2.5.3 Specific chemical.
We reviewed OSHA MIS inspection data for seventeen substances with recognized tox
icity and a meaningful number of inspections in the federal file, including mercury,
manganese, cadmium, beryllium, arsenic, nickel, trichloroethylene, methyl chloroform,
methylene chloride, ethylene dichloride, benzene, formaldehyde, TDI/MDI, toluene,
xylene, styrene, perchloroethylene, lead, asbestos, chromium, coal tar pitch vola-
tiles, and silica. Of these the last five substances had SICs which had at least
three inspections, a mean severity level over the PEL (over 1/4 the PEL for asbestos),
and were not among the top 75 IBER-ranked industries. Altogether, there were 17 SICs
meeting these criteria, shown in Executive Summary Table 1. Identification of these
SICs represents a very important approach in our view, insofar as the identified
substance may be endemic to the particular industry, so that we would expect to find
that substance in use in any county where that industry was in operation.
4.2.5.4 Overlapping Ranking Systems.
Particular emphasis needs to be directed to those industries where there is sub-
stantial overlap between the OWI-IRI-IBER systems, especially where there is a size-
able employment pattern.
OWT and IRI Overlap
Twelve SICs 7391, 5511, 4932, 5541, 2752, 1721, 2834, 2751, 3479, 3544, 2821 and
7699 are in the top 20% ranking of both OWI and IRI (Executive Summary Table 1).
While recognizing the limits of these data bases, these industries were found to have
a large number of hazardous chemicals with a significant number of employees
potentially exposed. Additional investigations of these industries may be
appropriate.
OWI/TRI and IBER Overlap
If an industry appears on the top. of OWI or IRI and IBER, it indicates that there
is a history of high exposures to a number of highly toxic substances and that a sig-
nificant number of workers are thought to be exposed.
With no. consideration of employment in Santa Clara County, there were 71 SICs that
appeared in the top 20% of at least three out of the four composite IBER listings
(e.g. MnSubs). Of these 71, 10 SICs also appeared in the top 20% of the IRI listing
of SICs, and 26 were in the top 20% of the OWI list as shown in Executive Summary
Tables 2 and 3 respectively. There were 8 SICs that were in the top 20% of all three
lists, 2821, 3731, 3715, 2851, 3269, 7699, 3479, and 3411. Of the 28 remaining SICs,
5 have no employment in Santa Clara County. The two largest SICs, 1761 and 7699, are
characterized by being mainly small in individual company employment size, e.g., 142
of 150 establishments in SIC 1761 employ less than 50 persons and 250 of 252 estab-
lishments in SIC 7699 employ less than 50. The SICs identified as being high in both
IBERS and either OWI or IRI represent industries deserving of follow-up to determine
whether similar patterns of exposure found in federal OSHA inspections are common to
Santa Clara County.
-xviii-
-------
Executive Summary Table 2
INOUSTRirS RANKED IN TOP 20% Of INDUSTRIAL RISK INDEX (IRI)
SIC INDUSTRY
I
X
H-
X
I
IRI IRI OW« j IBER S.C. COUNTY
RANK RANK RATINGS EMPLOYMENT
IN TOP 20%
1<496 MISC. FABRIC. WIRE PROD.
2834 PHAIIMACEU1 ICAL PHEP.
2893 PRINTING INK
2851 PAINIS Ic ALLIED PHD.
2295 COATED FABRICS,NOT RUBBER
3565 INDUSTRIAL PAIICRNS
28113 SURFACE ACIIVE ACCNIS
2992 LUBRIC. OILS. CREASES
28)3 MCOICINALS. B01ANICALS
2842 POLISHES. SANS!. PRO.
1381 DRILLING OIL AND GAS
2821 PLASTICS MATERIALS
2262 FINISHING PLAN IS, SYN
3996 HARD SURF. FLOOR COVER
8931 ACCOUNTING. AUDITING
1743 URHAZ20, TILE. MARBLE
2591 DRAPERY HARDWARE. BLINDS
2844 TOILET PREPARATIONS
3299 NONHETALLIC MINERAL PRO
2022 CHEESE. NA1UHAL Ic PHOC
8099 HEALTH SERVICES. NEC
2831 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS
35
1
2
0
0
0
4 •
e
3 «
t
.
2
_
6
2
0
4 •
0
.
0
it •
136
1097
5
189
.
16
i
,
135
85
13
303
6
3612
323
124
53
6
104
205
528
484
15
306
2645
.
232
1125
1652
300
4288
145
11
28)5
27
2224
229
13
405
100
83
2457
5
92
16
96
-------
Executive Sunmary Table 2
(2)
INDUSTRIES HANKED IN TOP 20% OF INDUSTRIAL RISK INDCN (INI )2
SIC INOUStMY
X
X
I
I Ml
RANK
INI OWI § IBER S.C. COUNTY
RANK RATINGS EMPLOYMENT
IN TOP 20%
2047 PREPARED ANIMAl FEEDS 54
3952 LEAD PENCILS. ART GOODS 55
3554 PAPER IND. MACHINERY 56
3643 CURRENT-CARRYING WIRING 57
5081 COMMERCIAL MACHINES 58
59?I LIQUOR STORES 59
7699 REPAIR SERVICES. NEC 60
45OO AIR IRANSPORTAIION 61
3955 CARBON PAPER ft RIBBON 62
4131 INIERCIIY HIGHWAY TRANS. 63
eon orricES or PHYSICIANS 64
4721 TRANSPORT. ARRANGfMLNI 65
2761 MANIEOLD BUSINESS IORMS 66
5084 INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY 67
3694 ENGINE II EC. EQPT. 68
3731 SHIP BLOC, ft REPAIR. 69
3585 RETRIC. ft HEAT. EQPT. 70
7391 RESEARCH ft DEV. LABS 71
2/51 COMMERCIAL PRINIINC 72
4932 GAS AND OTHER SERVICE 73
3711 MOIOH VEHICLES 74
7949 COMMERCIAL SPORTS. NEC 75
3179 MEIAL COATING 76
2256 KNITTING MIILS 77
3811 ENG. ft SCIEN. INSTRUMENT 78
3623 WELDING APPARAIUS 79
3999 MIC. INUUSIRIES NEC 80
3567 IND. FURNACES ft OVCNS 81
4'l?2 COASTWISE IRANSPORI. 82
4580 AIR IRANSPORI SERVOS 83
3573 ELECTRONIC COMPUTING 84
3729 AIRCRAM ft PARTS NEC 85
NOTES:
. NO DATA FOR THIS SIC
• RANKING IS IN THE TOP 2Of OE ALL SICS
IBER * INSPECTION BASED EXPOSURE RATINGS
0.553
O.552
0.550
0.550
0. 544
0.538
0.531
0.530
0.523
0.512
0.507
0.505
O.504
0.499
0.490
0. 490
0.489
0.489
0.485
0.484
0.480
0.411
0.471
0.469
0.469
0.158
0.158
O.157
0.143
0.442
0.441
0.437
m
270
230
333
175
208
27 •
%
57 •
191
188
.
84 •
175
167
4 •
117 •
135
64 •
21 •
251
5 •
m
260
151
207
48 •
90 •
293
.
^
m
0
2
9
t
* •
m
0
^
0
t
0
.
0
4 •
2
0
0
^
2
a
3 •
>
0
0
0
0
,
t
0
„
9
B
102
2943
1085
1043
14
1
2120
231
1123
27
22
42
14603
829
2307
2599
660
4680
2
2375
32
t
70506
.
-------
Executive Summary Table 3
INOUSfRICS RANKED IN IOP 20% Of OSIIA WEIGHTED INDEX (OWI)
SIC INDUSTRY
I
X
X
3996 HARD SURFACE ELOOR COVER
3269 POIIERY PRODUCTS, NEC
3325 STEEL FOUNDRIES, NEC
3731 SHIP BUILDING ft REPAIR
3479 MEIAL COATING
356% INDUSTRIAL PATTERNS
2791 TYPESEITING
2B'l3 SUHFACE ACTIVE AGENTS
2661 BLOC PAPER ft BOARD MILLS
3t4l46 ARCHITECIURAL METAL WORK
3531 CONSIRUCTION MACIHNfRY
Jl4l41 EAURICAIED PLATE WORK
3568 POWER TRANSMISSION EQPT
28142 POLISHES ft SAN 11 PRO
2822 SVNIHETIC RUDDER
3553 WOODWORKING MACHINERY
Jl4«4l fAUHIC SIRUCIURAL MEIAL
2435 HARDWOOD VENEER. PLYWOOD
4931 ELECTRIC ft OIHER SERVICE
1932 CAS AND OIHER SERVICE
4939 COMBINATION UTILITY SVC
3542 MACHINE TOOLS. MEIAL
3317 STEEL PIPE AND TUBES
2732 BOOK PRINTING
7692 WEI DING REPAIR
769<4 ARHAIURE REWINDING
7699 REPAIR SERVICES. NEC
3715 TRUCK TRAILERS
3532 MINING MACHINERY
3741 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT
3321 CRAV IRON FOUNDRIES
3691 STORAGE DAIIEHIES
2865 CYCLIC CRUDES. INTRMEDS
3792 TRAVEL TRAILERS, CAMPERS
5541 GASOLINE SVC SIATIONS
3322 MALLEABLE IRON FOUNDRIES
3449 HISC METAL WORK NEC
5511 NEW ft USED CAR DEALERS
3561 PUMPS AND PUMPING fQPT
2851 PAINTS ft ALLIED PRODS
3ilHl| SHEET MEIAL WORK
341 I MLIAL CANS
2821 PLASTIC HAIERIALS
U2I PAINIINC. PAPER HANGING
1711 PIUHHINU. HEAI. AIH COND
3953 MAMKING DEVICES
3567 INOUSIRIAL FURNACES
0071 MIOICAL LAHORMOHIES
8U72 OfNIAL LAOURAIOItlLS
3>l62 IRON fc SltfL FORGING
2U1>« WOOU KI1CMF.N CAB I NT IS
S6/J CLCC1RONIC IRANSI (IHHCMS
OWI
RANK
1
2
1
4
5
6
7
9
10
II
12
11
14
15
16
17
IB
19
21 ••
21
21
23
24
25
27
27
27
29
30
11
12
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
4/
48
50
50
51
52
53
OSIIA
WLICHID
INDEX
235. 4
209.7
198.1
190.4
188.1
187.5
177.9
177.8
169.2
157.9
154.4
151.7
143.7
141.3
140.7
139.8
139.1
138.5
137.0
137.0
137.0
136.0
132.4
130.9
124.9
124.9
124 9
122.7
122.0
121.7
121.6
118. 1
114.8
113.7
110. B
108.6
107.0
106.6
106.6
106. 1
105.2
IU3.6
102.7
102.3
101.7
lot. 1
100.2
98.9
96.9
98.8
98.5
91. 7
IRI
RANK
14
19
c
69
76
6
220
7
161
150
179
296
B
10
18 B
217
105
0
26
71
a
141
121
216
m
m
60
49
162
270
119
9
B
40
149
168
15
14
4
290
41
12
11
230
198
81
>
1 IBER S
RATINGS
IN TOP 20%
2
4 •
4 •
4 •
1 •
,
O
• 0
0
0
4 •
4 •
0
• 0
0
0
4 •
O
• 0
•
^
0
0
0
2
0
46
• 4 •
0
4 •
4 •
4 •
2
2
•
4 •
1 •
2
1
4 •
1 •
1 •
4 •
" 2
2
1
• 0
0
O
O
1
O
.C. COUNTY
EMPLOYMENT
*
27
1
22
660
16
257
t
0
84
197
109
^
85
14
128
712
%
15
2107
^
21
m
2
245
44
1041
5
a
.
22
180
^
21
2224
10
^
4288
100
189
1521
229
303
1125
4015
51
32
462
360
55
3
-------
Executive Summary Table 3
(2)
INDUSTRIES RANKED IN TOP 20% OF OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX (OWI)
I
X
X
H-
H-
SIC DESCR
3331 PRIMARY ALUMINUM
7251 SHOE REPAIR. HAT CLEANING
3955 CAROON PAPCR, RIBBONS
753t TOP AND RODV REPAIR
7531 TIRE RETREADNG. REPAIR
7535 PAINT SHOPS
7538 GENERAL AUTO REPAIR
7539 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR.NEC
3562 BALL AND ROLLER BEARINGS
2751 COMMERCIAL PRINTING
2599 FUHNITURE, FIXTURES NEC
3915 JEWELLERS' MATERIALS
2611 PAPER COATING. GLAZES
1112 CONSTRUCTION SAND, GRAVEL
HlU6 INOIIS1RIAL SAND
2893 PRINIING INK
3582 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY EQPT
2831 PHARMACEUTICAL PREPS
28)3 MEDICINALS Ic BOTANICALS
I'll! DIMENSION STONE
3M7I PLATING AND POLISHING
3769 SPACE VEHICLE EQUIP
3361 ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES
1761 ROOFING fc SHEET METAL
3519 METALWORKING MACHINERY
3263 FINE EARTHNWARE UTENSILS
2511 WOOD PARTITIONS
2761 MANIFOLD BUSINESS FORMS
3515 MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES
1111 DEEP SEA FOREIGN TRANSPRT
3198 FABRICATED PIPE
3199 FABRICA1EO METAL PROD NEC
1121 NONCONTIGUOUS AREA TRANS
1122 COASTWISE TRANSPORT
1123 INIERCOASTAL TRANSPORT
3399 PRIMARY MCIAL PHOO NIC
3732 BOA I BUILDING AND RPR
2511 MEIAL HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE
3221 GLAbS CONFAINIRS
3511 TURBINES fr TURBINE SEIS
32V I AURAS IVE PROOUC I S
flO?I DENTIST OFFICES
25I9 HOUSIHOLO IUMNIIURE
3599 MACHINERY, NONfLECIRC
1582 AIRI'HFS k HYING flllDS
156) Alltpnr TERMINAL SERVICES
3)69 NONIERIIOUS FOUNDRIES
32/2 CONCRETE PRODUCTS,NIC
3559 SPICIAL INUUSIHY MACHINE
3183 AMMUNITION, NEC
OWI
RANK
55
i 56
57
60
60
60
60
60
63
61
66
67
68
. 70
70
71
72
73
71
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
83
81
85
86
87
! 88
90
90
90
92
93
: 95
96
98
99
100
101
in?
1()i|
101
1U5
106
to/
108
OSHA
WEIGHTO
INDEX
96.7
95.6
95.5
95.5
95.5
95.5
95.5
95.5
93.9
93.1
89.0
87.7
87.7
87.1
87.1
86.9
86.9
86.9
86.7
86.1
86.3
86.2
85.3
85.2
83.1
83.3
82.8
82.1
80.7
80.2
79.1
78.9
78.7
78.7
78.7
77.5
77.2
77.0
/5.6
75.0
71.9
71.8
71.1
73.1
72. 7
72. 7
71.5
70.7
70.0
69.7
IRI
RANK
369
t
62 •
B
•
t
^
•
17 •
72 •
205
9
16 •
t
3 •
229
2 •
9 •
f
123
260
272
t
126
66 •
235
88
302
188
,
82
.
179
96
366
1 77
189
50 •
,
B
132
f
155
190
121
.
I IBER S.C. COUNTY
RATINGS EMPLOYMENT
IN TOP 20%
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
2
6
3 •
2
1 •
0
1 •
0
0
6
2
0
2
0
0
0
103
11
TtIO
35
131
1717
718
83
829
130
6
100
23
5
1
1097
135
18
1031
165
182
1125
163
318
231
381
10
552
10
65
39
3
2350
92
770
11
63)7
105
31
71
265
1017
-------
Executive Summary Table 3
(3)
INDUSTRIES RANKED IN TOP 20% OF OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX (OHI)
X
H-
H-
SIC DESCR OWI OSHA
RANK WC 1 Gil ID
INDEX
2655 FIBER CANS. DRUMS 109 68.9
2819 IND INORGANIC CllfHS NEC 110 68.7
3713 TRUCK AND BUS BODIES III 66. 7
2841* TOILET PRCPAKAT IONS 112 68.5
2511 WOOD HOUSEHOLD FUHNIR 113 68.5
3589 SERVICE INUUSIRY HACH 1 1<« 68. l«
35<4'l SPECIAL DIES. TOOLS 115 67.9
7261 FUNERAL SERVICES 116 67.1
3085 REFRIC. IIFAING EQUIP 117 67.3
3552 TEXTILE HACIIINERV 118 66.9
1731 ELECIRICAL WOHK 119 66.7
3679 El ECTRONIC COMPONENTS 120 66.7
3535 CONVEYORS. CONVEYING 121 66.6
1791 SIRUCruRAL STEEI ERECT. 125 66.14
1793 GLASS. CLA2ING WORK 125 66. 1
i?9'i EXCAVATING. FOUNDATIONS 125 66. i
1795 WRECKING AND OEHOLI DON 125 66.1
1796 INSTALLING OLDG EQUIP 125 66. 4
1799 SPEC TRADE CONTRACTORS 125 66.1
5631 WOMEN'S ACCESSORY STORE 128 66.1
3931 MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS 129 66.1
2231 WEAVING. FINISHING WOOL 130 65.6
7391 RESEARCH fc DEVEL LADS 135 65. It
7392 MANAGEHENI. PUB ADMIN 135 65. 4
7393 OETECTV, PROTECTV SRV 135 65.1
7J9<4 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 135 65.1
7395 PHOIOFINISHING LADS 135 65. 1
7396 TRADING STAMP SERVICE 135 65.1
7397 COMMERCIAL TESTING LABS 135 65. 1
7399 BUSINESS SERVICES. NEC 135 65.1
36MI4 NONCURRENT-CAR. WIRING 139 65.1
NOTES:
. NO DATA FOR IHIS SIC
• RANKING IS IN THE TOP 20% OF ALL SICS
•* THIS INDEX IS CALCULAIEO ONI Y TOR 3-DIGIT SICS
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; THEREFORE SICS 14931.
1(939 ALL HAVE THE SAME OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX.
IRI
RANK
1148
107
219
18 «
1«1
228
2*4 •
f
70 *
167
129
131
321
389
.
330
t
B
169
202
s
71 •
t
0
.
o
•
333
307
IN NON-
1932 Ic
i IBER
RAT 1 NCS
IN TOP 20%
0
1 "
1 •
2
1
1 •
2
t
2
0
1
0
2
0
f
2
1
0
2
t
0
0
0
0
t
0
0
.
0
0
0
S.C. COUNIY
EMPLOYMENT
50
636
37
53
189
111
528
201
12
2
3171
23819
50
327
376
201
131
50
1331
73
122
f
11603
1199
2821
1165
1022
1735
7111
25
IRI - I NOUS)RIAL RISK INDEX
IBER = INSPECTION-BASED EXPOSURE RATINGS
-------
4.2.5.5 High IBER Ranking with Low Employment in Santa Clara County.
Combining all four composite IBER listings, we compiled a list of the top 75 SICs
ranked hazardous overall by the IBER system (Executive Summary Table 4). Many of
these SICs are given in Executive Summary Table I, but others did not meet the
employment cut-off of 300, or else were not ranked in the top 20% of at least 3 of the
4 composite listings. Nonetheless, these industries have a history of high exposures
to multiple substances. Local or state officials therefore need to consider this lest
seriously when defining priorities and resource allocation even though the overall
number of employees may be small.
4.2.5.6 Special Industries: Semiconductors (SIC 3674) and Hospitals (8062).
SICs 3674 (Semiconductors and Related Devices) and 8062 (Hospitals) were included
as highly ranked industries even though they were not ranked in the IRI and OWI nor
did they have high rankings in the IBER. Both industries are large employers in the
county, and use large numbers and quantities of toxic materials. In the case of the
Semiconductor Industry, we believe the industry would have been ranked in the top 20%
in the IRI or OWI rankings had NIOSH surveyed more worksites in this SIC as part of
NOHS. In fact, only one firm in this SIC was included in NOHS. In the case of hospi-
tals, recent reports of reproductive failure in personnel exposed to chemotherapeutic
agents, relatively recent evidence of carcinogenicity from exposure to the widely used
chemicals formaldehyde and ethylene oxide, and the as yet inadequately understood effects
of various anesthetic gases all deflate the value of IRI and OWI rankings of hospitals
(which are based on the 1974 NOHS) and argue for greater attention to this industry.
A major problem with the NOHS data base for this particular project derives from
its age. Much of the industry in Santa Clara County is new and, more importantly,
reflects changing technology. The IRI and OWI ranking methods are most useful when
listing industries which have not had major changes in chemical use during the past
decade.
4.2.5.7 Small Employers
Small employers constitute a particularly vexing problem. In Santa Clara County
there are a number of SICs with a large number of employees and, based upon federal
OSHA compliance data, a history of high exposures to potent chemicals, e.g., construc-
tion, SICs 1711 (plumbing, heating, and air conditioning), 1721 (painting, paper hang-
ing, and decorating), 1731 (electrical work), and 1799 (special trade contractors not
elsewhere classified); and SIC 7699 (repair services not elsewhere classified). How-
ever, in each SIC the number of establishments is also very large, which is indicative
of small employers. We shall address this problem below in our recommendations.
4.2.6 Discussion
The development of industry ranking schemes has not yet been discussed in the con-
text of how the information is to be used in Santa Clara County. The six uses of
information include: a) intervention, b) tracking of exposure or control of exposure
over time, c) planning, d) research, e) as a complement to disease surveillance, and
f) standard setting.
-XXIV-
-------
Executive Summary Table 4
75 INDUSIRIES WITH HiGMtST IBCR RANKS
ALTCRNAIC HAZARD RANKINGS AND SC COUNTY EMPLOYMENT
I
X
X
SIC
3341
3/31
3691
37M3
1622
3321
3523
3362
3U79
3093
3331
2616
3253
2819
2821
3332
3M33
3792
3713
2851
3531
3732
3325
2879
3339
3M'I3
3361
3'l'll
3229
37I'I
3715
3269
3312
1761
2952
39 I 'I
1611
3*199
3533
369?
3M9M
3516
3b'l5
7699
33')9
3295
7216
J3i?2
J?92
26'.»9
INDUSTRY
SECOND. NONFERROUS HCTALS
SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIR
STORAGE BAFTERICS
RAILROAD EQUIPMENT
BRIDGE. TUNNEL. EL. IIWYS
GRAY IRON FOUNDRIES
FARM MACHINERY AND EQPI
BRASS fc COPPER FOUNDRIES
HISC PLASTICS PRODUCTS
SCRAP AND WASTE HATTER
PRIMARY COPPER
INORGANIC PIGMENTS
CERAMIC WALL. H OOR TILE
IND. INORG. CIIEMS NEC
PLASTICS MATERIALS
PRIMARY LEAD
HEAT. EQUIP.. CXC. ELEC.
TRAVEL TRAILERS
TRUCK AND BUS BODIES
PAINIS Ic AIM ED PRODS.
CONSTRUCT ION MACHINERY
BOAT RUIIDBNG AND REPAIR
STEEL FOUNDRIES, NEC
AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS
PRIM. NONFFR. METALS NEC
FAORICAIED PIAIE WORK
ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES
FABRIC. STRUCTURAL METAL
PRESSED ANU BLOWN GLASS
MOTOR VEHICLE PARIS
TRUCK TRAILERS
POIIERY PRODUCTS. NEC
BLAST FURN, STEEL MILLS
ROOFING, SHEET METAL WRK
ASPHALT FELTS * COATINGS
SILVERWARE. PLATED WARE
HIGHWAY Ic STREET CONSTR.
FABRICATED METAL PRODS
OIL FIELD MACHINERY
PRIMARY BAHERIES
VALVES fc PIPE FITTINGS
HOISTS. CRANIS. MONORAIL
ELECTRIC LAMPS
PRIFAIIRIC. METAL HI DOS
MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES
IIEPAIR SERVICES. NIC
PRIM. HLIAL f'HOWJCIS NEC
MINIRALS. CIINI) OR TREAT.
UHY CLEANING CLANIS
MALLCAIILt I RON lOUNORICS
ASOFSIOS PRODUCTS
OIIMICAL PltrPARAI IONS
n«n:n. sinuc. CI_AV IILE
PHIMARV f ft t4f~.
IBER
RANK
i 1
2
3
M
5
6
7
a
9
10
II
12
13
15
15
16
17
18
19
21
21
22
23
2M
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
3 '1
36
36
37
38
39
MO
Ml
M3
Ml
'l5
H6
M7
MS
H9
50
51
53
51
OWI $
RANK
383
M •
33 •
31 •
157
32 •
232
231
286
395
6MM
322
f
110 •
MM •
t
30M
35 •
111 •
Ml •
12 •
93 •
3 •
f
209
13 "
78 •
18 «
B
15M
29 "
2 •
160
79 •
1M8
,
399
88 •
199
221
M9M
219
85 •
27 «
92 •
229
562
37 •
22%
B95
29 r
IRI
RANK
69
319
270
335
87
29
107
12
1MO
219
M
379
96
170
296
260
305
306
M9
39
182
272
192
356
188
100
250
285
235
60
179
28'l
I2M
3'i9
2M2
5J
Jl«8
SC COUNTY
EMPLOYMENT
80
22
180
330
22
172
67
2888
372
77
636
303
90
21
37
189
197
39
3
1008
35
109
182
712
307
290
5
27
39M
1M25
19
7
968
552
1M
M6
133
8
2MB
i|
38U
10H 3
65
67
751
1O
66
96
-------
txecutive nummary (able 4
(2)
75 INDUSTRIES WITH HIGHEST IBCR RANKS
WITH ALTERNATE HA/ARD RANKINGS AND SC COUNTV EMPLOYMENT
I
X
X
SIC INDUSTRY
3315 SICCL WIRE It RCL. PRODS
3511 SPECIAL DIES. TOOLS
320') CLAV RCrRACIORICS
3398 HEIAL HEAI TREATING
2295 COATED FABRICS. NOT RUB.
3356 NONFER. ROLL.. DRAW. NEC
362'! CARBON It CRAPIIIIC PRODS
3730 SHIP. BOAT DLDG ft RPRG
3221 CLASS CONIAINLHS
3537 IND. TRUCKS ft TRACTORS
3'l79 HEIAL COATING
3585 REFRIC. ft HEAT. EQUIP.
5961 HAIL ORDER HOUSES
3XM HETAL CANS
356? BALL ft ROLLER BEARINGS
1911 ELECTRIC SIRVICES
3569 CEN. IND. MACHINERY NEC
2fl'll SOAP ft OMIEK DEIEKGENIS
3321 STEEL INVEST. FOUNDRIES
333>l PRIMARY ALUMINUM
2661 BLOC PAPER ft BOARD HILLS
NOTES:
. NO DATA FOR THIS SIC
• RANKING IS IN THE 10P 20% OF ALL SICS
IRER = INSPECTION BASED EXPOSURE RATINGS
OWI = OSIIA WEIGHTED INDEX
IRI = INDUSTRIAL RISK INDEX
IDER
RANK
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
6'l
65
66
67
69
69
70
71
73
73
7<4
75
OWI
RANK
16
-------
4.2.6.1 Intervention.
Where an exposure is determined to be excessive, such that violation of standards
exist or there is documented illness, intervention by appropriate authorities is
highly relevant. The possible intervening agencies in Santa Clara County include
CAL/OSHA, NIOSH, Department of Health Services (HESIS and Epiderniologic Studies Unit),
and the Occupational Health Section within the Santa Clara County Health Department.
For these agencies the approach to industry ranking may be different from one using
the information for other purposes, e.g., research. Industries which have substantial
employment in the county and a history of high measured exposures should have the
highest priority for follow-up and resource allocation. Industries which rank high in the
IBERS or have documented high exposures to particular agents should be given the highest
priority by the intervening agency. Even industries which are small employers may require
a high priority if excessive exposures are anticipated. Where the potentially important SIC
is made up of a large number of small employers the intervention may be conducted in
two phases, a problem identification phase followed by an extensive education campaign or
a requirement for environmental and biological monitoring.
Those industries high in the OWI or IRI but having low measured exposures would
not be a high priority for an intervention agency. For example, CAL/OSHA's compliance
effort is not likely to have a major impact on industries in which the measured expo-
sure levels are low. The semiconductor industry is an obvious case in point. Regula-
tory agencies generally are guided by their promulgated standards and have less flexi-
bility in circumstances where the measured exposures are low.
4.2.6.2 Tracking of exposures over time.
All the approaches developed for ranking industry are appropriate here, and all
the agencies previously defined will have an interest in this category. Presumably
CAL/OSHA or the county has the lead in establishing baseline conditions, i.e. deter-
mining the degree of exposure in a particular industry at a particular time. No
agency has the resources to continually monitor exposures in each industry with sus-
pected problems over time and that is why CAL/OSHA conducts spot checks, inspections,
on an ongoing basis. Unfortunately, that approach leaves great gaps in the data
available. The burden for ongoing monitoring could be undertaken by the affected
establishments. CAL/OSHA or Santa Clara County could establish requirements for envi-
ronmental monitoring by industry or by specific chemical. Such rules would spell out
the chemicals required to be monitored, the levels at which monitoring needs to be
initiated, e.g., at some "action level", reporting requirements, and other provisions
which enable the tracking of chemical exposure over time while placing limited burdens
on the affected industries. Under such a program, industries would have to report use
of certain chemicals limited to those with significant toxicity, e.g., lead, silica,
and carcinogens, and report the monitoring results to the agency. A major role of
regulatory bodies would then be to review the monitoring results and do spot checks on
the adequacy of the monitoring programs.
4.2.6.3 Planning.
The agencies involved in planning are very wide ranging and include CAL/OSHA,
Department of Health Services, Santa Clara County Health Department, local planning
agencies, hospitals, clinics etc. Planning can include assessing clinical services
available to handle a catastrophic event, such as a chemical explosion or uncontrolled
-xxvii-
-------
release, emergency room capability, planning of health services within an industry,
e.g., medical screening, biological monitoring, and routine medical capability, to
resource allocation and the planning of inspection priorities by CAL/OSHA. The role
of the county in the planning to address catastrophes and accidents is especially important.
The industry ranking schemes which focus on industries with a history of high exposures
are relevant to all agencies involved in health planning. However, the limitations of the
data bases are such that we do not believe that the ranking systems defined here are as
yet adequate for a systematic approach to health care planning. This area requires specific
follow-up subsequent to this report. Specific planning around crisis intervention,
emergency room facilities, and response to catastrophic events deserves special attention
given that certain industries use large quantities of highly toxic materials.
4.2.6.4 Research.
The principal agencies concerned with conducting research in workplace settings
are NIOSH, Department of Health Services, the Northern and Southern Occupational
Health Centers, and to a limited extent, CAL/OSHA. The relevance of the ranking
schemes to researchers depends on the nature of the specific research objective.
Identification of industries with significant exposures to regulated chemicals with
well-known health effects may be of little interest to the researcher whose goal is to
discover new etiologic relationships in industries with excess morbidity or mortality.
On the other hand, use of the NIOSH NOHS data, to identify unregulated chemicals for
research purposes, may be of particular value. Therefore, the IRI and OWI rankings
may have special significance to the researcher. Data from the OSHA MIS does have
relevance to the researcher who is assessing the adequacy of a particular standard
insofar as he/she wishes to study exposures below the current standards. For example,
an industry with a history of exposures to particular solvents at levels below the
OSHA standard may be an important environment in which to study the long term CNS
effects of low level exposure. The utility of the rankings for the researcher there-
fore ultimately depend on the specific research hypothesis.
4.2.6.5 Complement to Disease Surveillance.
Rankings which focus on "specific chemicals" as opposed to multiple exposures are
most appropriate here. Identification of industries with a history of exposure to
lead represents a good example of the use of the ranking systems in combination with
disease surveillance/biological monitoring programs.
4.2.6.6 Standard setting.
Use of the OSHA MIS data to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular
substance and to assess the magnitude of that exposure are two important aspects of
standard setting. Use of the information to identify populations at risk below the
standard also represent an important application of the information. The NOHS based
information has utility here insofar as it identifies user populations not identified
by the OSHA MIS and may be used to provide estimates of the number of workers exposed
to a particular chemical. CAL/OSHA would be the prime user of ranking methods for
standard setting purposes.
-xxviii-
-------
4.3 Identification of Hazardous Industries from CAL/OSHA Citation and Inspection Data
Since the actual exposure information derived from CAL/OSHA inspections is not
computerized, a similar approach to that described for the development of the IBERS
using federal data could not be constructed. CAL/OSHA does computerize general infor-
mation on its inspections and resulting citations, however, and we requested such a
tape for Santa Clara County. A review of citations was conducted to determine where
overexposures to chemical agents had been identified in the county during the period
1979-1984.
CAL/OSHA compliance inspections in Santa Clara County resulted in 13 citations for
worker overexposure to chemical agents during 1979-84. The specific chemicals cited
and the SICs are identified in Executive Summary Table 5. During this period, viola-
tions of numerous standards were cited, but those listed represent the only overexpo-
sures identified.
We were also able to use the data available to focus a review of specific company
case files, for more detailed analysis of particularly important industries in the
country. These data are presented in the industry profiles, summarized below.
4.4 Profiles of Selected Industries
In addition to our analysis of all Santa Clara County industries with over 300
employees using the IRI, OWI, and IBER computerized ranking systems, we selected six
industries for more detailed review. These industries were selected because 1) they
had very significant employment in the county, and 2) there were strong indications
that potential or actual exposure problems existed in these industries. These indica-
tions took different forms. In some cases, the industry had ranked high in one or
more of the computerized ranking systems; in others, an industry firm had been cited
for violations of CAL/OSHA exposure limits. In two cases (Hospitals and Semiconduc-
tors) the IRI and OWI rankings were not thought to reflect the current knowledge
regarding hazards used in these industries. We also felt that regardless of ranks,
the materials used and atypical use conditions in these industries merited further
analysis.
The industries profiled included Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674),
Electronic Components not elsewhere classified (SIC 3674), Miscellaneous Plastics
Products (SIC 3079), Electroplating (SIC 3479), General Medical and Surgical Hospitals
(SIC 8062), and Tank and Tank Components (SIC 3795, a SIC represented by one company
FMC corporation). These industries together employ approximately 102,000 persons or
roughly 16% of the total Santa Clara County workforce.
In these more detailed analyses, we were able to incorporate data which were not
available in a suitably automated form for comparing the entire spectrum of indus-
tries. These data included monitored exposure levels from CAL/OSHA inspectors, NIOSH
Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's), and California Division of Labor Statistics and
Research (DLSR) occupational .illness statistics. Summaries of the findings contained
in the six industry profiles are given below.
-XXIX-
-------
Executive Summary Table 5
Worker Overexposure Citations in Santa Clara County
from CAL/OSHA Inspection Files 1979-84
SIC
Company
Standard
Violated
Substance
*
Inspec
Year
2649 Tag Industries Inc.
2879 Moyer Chemical Co.
3522 FMC Airline Equip. Div,
367 ** Powell Electronics
3842 Hosmer Dorrance
5161 Jones Chemical Co.
8062 Santa Teresa Community
Hospital
5141(a)
5155(b)
3272 Sakrete 5141(a)
3296 Owens Corning Fiberglass 5141(b)
341 ** Lorentz Barrel & Drum 5155(c)
3489 FMC Ordnance Division 5155(b)
5155(b)
5141(a)
5155(c)
5155(c)
5141(a)
5141(c)
5155(c)
nuisance dust 1963
parathion, methyl 1979
parathion
silica 1982
silica 1980
solvent mixture 1981
total dust, 1980
alum, welding fume
nuisance dust 1980
trichloroethylene 1982
trichloroethylene 1981
phosgene, hydrogen 1982
chloride gas
formaldehyde 1981
* 5141 • Control of Harmful Exposure to Employees
5155 - Airborne Contaminants
** no 4-digit SIC code available
-xxx-
-------
4.4.1 Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674).
The semiconductor industry employes 52,187 persons in the county, or about 8% of
the county's workforce. The majority of workers (85%) are employed in large firms,
i.e., with 250 or more employers.
The Semiconductor industry did not rank high in any of the three ranking systems
used, though as noted above, the IRI and OWI systems were rendered irrelevant due to
inadequate inclusion of this industry in the NOHS (only one firm being surveyed). How-
ever, the more recent National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES), along with two
studies performed on this industry, the 1981 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study and
the 1980-81 NIOSH Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Indus-
try, reveal an extensive list of hazardous substances used in various industry pro-
cesses, including large quantities of solvents, acids, toxic gases (arsine, phosphine,
diborane), and other substances.
Actual exposure levels found in OSHA inspections (1981-83), eight NIOSH Health
Hazard Evaluations, four NIOSH Control Technology reports, and twenty CAL/OSHA inspec
tion records for firms in SIC 3674 were reviewed, along with the 1981 CAL/OSHA study
and some industry monitoring data obtained from the Semiconductor Industry-Associa-
tion, a trade group. (The OSHA data and most of the NIOSH reports neglected firms
outside of California.) Together these sources represented thousands of exposure
samples. While these samples contained some instances of overexposure, on the whole
exposures were well below the established limits.
However, worker health complaints such as irritation of mucous membranes, burns,
respiratory distress and light-headedness were found in five of the eight Health
Hazard Evaluations reviewed. Both the 1981 CAL/OSHA study and an article based on the
NIOSH Control Technology studies expressed concern over potential arsenic exposure
from ion-implantation operations, especially during maintenance. Federal OSHA and
industry data showed some exposures at or near the PEL for lead. Also, data from the
California Division of Labor Statistics and Research showed that in 1983 and 1984, the
proportion of Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness (which record
occupational illness resulting in one or more lost work days) for SIC 3674 in Santa
Clara County was 1.4 to 1.5 times higher than the industry's proportion of the
county's total employment. Most illnesses recorded for the industry were due to acids
or unspecified chemical compounds. Few epidemiological studies of this industry
exist. One study (Sorahan, Waterhouse, McKiernan, et al., 1985) showed an excess of
malignant melanoma in semiconductor workers in Great Britain, though no occupational
cause was found.
These findings, combined with the dynamic character of the industry, the limita-
tions of current monitoring or illness reporting systems for capturing certain poten-
tial problems (e.g. chronic low level solvent exposure), and the potential for catas-
trophic accidents due to explosive gases lead us to recommend further assessment of
the industry, as described in the recommendations section below.
4.4.2 Electronic Components not elsewhere classified (SIC 3679)
SIC 3679 is the third largest industrial classification in Santa Clara County,
with a total employment of 23,849. SIC 3679 is a very heterogenous classification,
but is dominated by printed circuit board manufacture in the county. Most worke'rs are
employed by firms with less than 250 workers.
-xxxi-
-------
This SIC does not rank at all high (bottom 50%) in the IBER system of industry
hazard ranking, based on actual exposure levels found by federal OSHA, nor were any
overexposures found in the fifteen CAL/OSHA inspection records reviewed. However, the
nature of the hazards used, particularly lead compounds, acids, chromium, and sol-
vents, placed it within the top 20% in the OWI rankings, and OSHA inspection data did
disclose occasional overexposures to lead, manganese, mercury, and other substances.
Moreover, anecdotal evidence from two NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations suggests a
potential for toxic solvent exposures related to degreasing operations, and occupational
illness data from the Division of Labor Statistics and Research indicate that acute hazards
are a significant and continuing source of worker illness in this industry. These
indications, combined with the significant contribution of the industry to Santa Clara
County employment make a case for further attention to this industry.
Such attention may be especially warranted insofar as the demographic distribution
of the industry in favor of small firms (less than 50 workers) makes it difficult for
complaint-driven inspections alone to assess adequately the full range of establish-
ments in the industry. Indeed, the fragmented nature of SIC 3679 may recommend it as
a worthwhile focus for the County Health Department and local communities through the
Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. According to administrators of the City of
Santa Clara's ordinance, printed circuit board manufacturers presently comprise a
large component of the city's registered users of hazardous materials; this may be the
case in other communities as well. Review of hazardous materials storage listings
could confirm the nature and quantity of hazardous materials used in given areas by
the industry, and suggest further avenues of inquiry.
4.4.3 Miscellaneous Plastics Products (SIC 3079)
SIC 3079 employs 2,888 persons in Santa Clara County, all of whom work in firms
with fewer than 250 workers. The industry ranked very high (36th out of 475, or in
the top 89%) in the IBER ranking system, based on actual exposures from OSHA inspec-
tions. (This rank is for chronic hazards only; if acute hazards are factored into
rankings, the industry ranks 9th, or in the top 2%.) Among substances contributing to
the high rank were lead, chromic acid, MEK, MOCA, phenol, styrene, and various other
substances. In contrast, SIC 3079 ranked in the top 25% using the IRI system, and in
the bottom 50% in the OWI system, both ranks based on potential exposures from NIOSH
survey data.
In addition to the overexposures shown in federal OSHA data, fifteen NIOSH Health
Hazard Evaluations (HHE's) reviewed disclosed numerous miscellaneous health com-
plaints, and three HHE's found overexposures to a total of five substances, including
styrene. High employment and documented exposure problems in the industry make this
SIC an important Santa Clara County occupational health focus. The problem of small
firms in this industry, like in SIC 3679, may be amenable to local efforts through
Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances and the County Health Department.
4.4.4 Electroplating (SIC 3471)
SIC 3471 employs 1,034 persons in Santa Clara County, with 60% working in shops
with less than 50 workers.
-XXXll-
-------
Due to the presence of solvents, toxic metals, acids, silica, asbestos, and vari-
ous other hazards, this- industry ranked 76th and of 549 industries in the OWI ranking
system, or within the top 14% of OWI hazardous industries. The industry ranked 123rd
(out of 412 industries • ranked), or in the top 30%, in IRI rankings.
Federal OSHA inspection data showed overexposures to nine substances, including
lead arsenate, silica, chromates, and trichloroethylene. Based on these data, SIC
3471 ranked 98th out of 475 industries ranked, or just outside the top 20% of IBER
hazardous industries. Data from Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness
showed very few reports (8 each in 1983 and 1984) for this industry; however this fig-
ure is still 3 1/2 times what would be expected given the industry's proportion of
total employment in the county.
The great potential for exposure to highly toxic materials for a large number of
workers in this industry, as indicated by the high OWI rank, the documented overexpo-
sures nationally, shown by the federal OSHA data and the fairly high IBER rank, and
high employment in the county make this an important industry for further analysis.
4.4.5 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (SIC 8062)
This industry is one of the ten largest in Santa Clara County, employing 14,272
people, most of whom work in hospitals with over 250 employees.
SIC 8062 was not included in IRI rankings. The OWI ranking (for 3-digit SIC 806;
4-digit ranking not available) was quite low (248th out of 549 rankings), and the IBER
ranking was also low (top 38% if acute hazards are included and bottom 50% if only
chronic hazards are used).
Though the industry received low IBER ranks, federal OSHA inspection data from 26
inspections between 1979 and 1982 revealed overexposures to five chemicals, including
formaldehyde. Of CAL/OSHA inspection records reviewed, encompassing twelve inspections
among five Santa Clara County hospitals, only one hospital was cited (twice) for over-
exposures, also to formaldehyde.
Despite the absence of high hazard ranks or consistent exposure patterns in SIC
8062, there are special considerations in assessing this industry. New toxicological
information has emerged since the NOHS in 1974 on many specific hazards found in hos-
pitals, particularly with regard to the potential carcinogenic effects of the steril-
ant gases ethylene oxide and formaldehyde, and reproductive effects associated with
alkylating agents, hormones, antineoplastic drugs, and other drugs, for which detect-
able air levels have been found during dose preparation. This emerging literature,
combined with the industry's high county employment and some past evidence of actual
overexposures indicate the merits of continued evaluation of this industry.
4.4.6 FMC Corporation (SIC 3795)
FMC Corporation is a large multi-product corporation with three units in Santa
Clara County, the International Division, the Ordinance Division, and the Defense Sys-
tems Headquarters. These units manufacture military vehicles and conduct research on
defense technology. We have classified FMC Corporation operations in the county as
SIC 3795, tank manufacture. This SIC was not included in any of the rankings due to
insufficient data.
-XXXlll-
-------
FMC Corporation employs just over 1% of the workers in the county (6,680
employees). These workers are exposed to a variety of toxic substances, including
potential carcinogens, solvents, respiratory sensitizers (MDI), and metals. CAL/OSHA
and NIOSH monitoring data disclose instances of high exposure concentrations over sev-
eral years, particularly in welding operations. The CAL/OSHA monitoring data is espe-
cially significant in light of the very limited number of actual PEL violations found
by CAL/OSHA in Santa Clara County, in any SIC, between 1979 and 1984. The large
worker population, the use of toxic substances involved, and the history of high expo-
sures at FMC argue the need for continued scrutiny of worker exposures by FMC and
CAL/OSHA.
-xxxiv-
-------
5. Recommendations
The recommendations in this report are classified into three categories:
a) Improvement of the available data bases and data collection.
b) High priority industries for further investigation.
c) Research needs in particular industries.
5.1. Recommended Improvements in Data Collection and Use
This subsection contains specific recommendations for adapting existing data gathering
programs in ways which could enhance surveillance of occupational exposure and related
disease outcomes by helping to create viable linkages between them. Suggestions will be
made concerning the utilization of demographic and exposure data.
5.1.1 Demographic Data Recommendations
5.1.1.1 EDD should allow access to "confidential" data.
A cooperative relationship should be initiated between the Employment Development
Department (EDD) and relevant agencies to allow access to an industry-occupation matrix,
along with related growth projections. The ability to use data gathered by EDD is
essential if an adequate occupational health surveillance system is to be developed. We are
not entirely aware of the basis of the EDD confidentiality requirements, i.e., whether they
are required by legislative mandate or are matters of state policy. Whatever the basis of
the requirement, relief should be sought in order that the information be available to other
state agencies. Selection of either the Occupational Employment Survey (OES) survey matrix
or the Census-based matrix should take into consideration the population sub-groups to be
targeted for educational and/or enforcement activities, since the two matrices encompass
different populations. The Census-based matrix includes self-employed persons but excludes
second jobs, while the OES survey includes second jobs but excludes railroad workers,
domestic workers as well as workers in agriculture, education and hospitals.
Such a matrix could be progressively "filled in" as applicable exposure and disease
data are developed. Knowing the proportional occupational breakdown within industries
would help in utilizing data which are by occupation only. Knowing the projected growth
trends would also assist in identifying industries and occupations expected to expand. In
addition to the obvious convenience, a ready-made matrix obtained from EDD would have
several significant advantages over one constructed from other sources: it would be more
accurate, more up-to-date, and more valid at the local level in any California county than
national data bases.
-xxxv-
-------
5.1.1.2. CAL/OSHA should adopt industry ranking approaches.
In addition to computerizing exposure data from compliance inspections, CAL/OSHA
should consider adopting the methods described in the report as one of the bases for
scheduling inspections as well as developing other approaches to scheduling.
5.1.1.3. Hazard Surveillance should be part of DIR and DOHS efforts.
The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Department of Health Services
(DOHS) need to give greater attention to the implementation of hazard and health
surveillance systems. The current system of priority setting which relies on the individual
worker or union for ascertaining if a health hazard exists—while important—is not entirely
satisfactory for priority setting purposes. That is, compliance activity by CAL/OSHA has
historically been driven by jemployee complaints even in the health area, where workers are
not necessarily knowledgeable about the hazards they face, and where and where
information alone may not suffice.
Relying on worker-initiated complaints or requests is important in the overall attempt
to protect the state's working population; the state also needs to develop a more
sophisticated surveillance system so that scientists and health professionals can use their
expertise to establish occupational health priorities. We propose that the state consider
different approaches to setting occupational health priorities which will be based upon the
implementation of a comprehensive hazard and health surveillance system. These new
approaches would have the effect of broadening the data bases available for surveillance
purposes.
5.1.1.4 Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance Data should be expanded and computerized.
EPA, the State of California, the County of Santa Clara and the local municipalities
need to review the lack of computerization of the information gathered under hazardous
materials ordinances. Passage of local ordinances which provide for collection of
information on the location and use of toxic chemicals represents important legislation, but
failure to implement those rules and lack of computerization render the statutes relatively
useless. Local agencies should ensure all relevant data are collected, such as SIC, to ensure
the data are useful for surveillance purposes. Coordination between the task force
developing the statewide approach and the IEMP is essential.
5.1.1.5 Health outcome data deserves analysis in a separate study.
This report has used information on chemical hazards and exposures to rank industry
for purposes of follow-up. A similar study should be conducted which evaluates
information from health outcome, disease surveillance, epidemiological studies and
injury and illness reporting schemes to rank industries according to their potential
for having occupational health problems. This study would presumably identify
weaknesses in available data bases as well as identifying populations at risk.
Careful attention needs to be given to methods for evaluating anecdotal reports of
illness and injury. An evaluation of health outcome data for Santa Clara County would
focus and narrow the issues to be addressed. Some deficiencies in current data bases
or data sources related to health outcomes are noted in this report (Section 2 and
Appendix 10), and include lack of industry and occupation variables in disease
surveillance systems.
-xxxvi-
-------
5.1.2 Exposure Data Recommendations
5.1.2.1 CAL/OSHA should computerize exposure monitoring results.
Inasmuch as CAL-OSHA exposure records represent the only actual measured
exposures on a local level, CAL-OSHA should computerize and tabulate these sampling
results by SIC in a manner similar to and comparable with the OSHA MIS System. The
specific substances encountered and their airborne concentrations should be computerized
by four digit SIC code. In addition, occupation and specific job title information should
be computerized for each sample taken. This represents one of our most important
recommendations and will have implications for research, for targeting inspections,
special studies and data-based educational efforts. Our inability to obtain CAL-OSHA
exposure information represented one most vexing problem in this study.
5.1.2.2. The number of substances requiring user registration should be expanded.
Consideration should also be given to establishing reporting requirements by industry
for certain specific noncarcinogenic substances. Registration of use is currently required
for regulated carcinogens under the Occupational Cancer Control Act. Additional chemical
agents such as lead, other metals, silica, solvents and other recognized toxic agents should
also require reporting. The list of carcinogens which require reporting should also be
expanded to include chemicals identified by the National Toxicology Program and the
International Agency for Research on Cancer.
5.1.2.3 CAL/OSHA should obtain employer-collected monitoring data.
CAL/OSHA should consider promulgating standards requiring employers to conduct
environmental monitoring, and where appropriate, biological monitoring for specific agents
with recognized toxicity. CAL/OSHA should collect these data on a periodic basis and
they should be computerized. This information would then form the basis for ongoing
surveillance of chemical hazards. This recommendation is most appropriately implemented
at the statewide level by CAL/OSHA. The Santa Clara County Health Department could
also consider adopting monitoring requirements.
5.2. Highest Priority Industries Recommendations.
The industries found in Executive Summary Table 1 are those industries which our
approaches to ranking have identified as having the greatest potential for workplace
exposures. These industries may require further evaluation to assess a) whether
significant exposures exist, b) whether there are health problems associated with
workplace exposures, and c) which agencies and approaches are most appropriate to
assess the potential for exposure. In some instances additional research is required,
e.g. the semiconductor industry (SIC 3674), whereas compliance activity is most
appropriate where there is a plausible belief that excessive exposures are occurring.
The data in other tables on industries ranking high in IBERS, OWI, IRI, and employment
are also worthy of review. Finally, the professional judgement of occupational health
professionals in the county will be extremely important in reviewing these lists.
-xxxvii-
-------
Persons familiar with the industry in the county may be able to
review these rankings and provide valuable insight regarding research and compliance
priorities.
5.2.1 Small Employers.
There are numerous industries identified in this report which have a history of high
exposures to specific chemicals but which are generally small or which have no fixed
location. Examples include SICs 1611 (Highway and Street Construction), 1761 Roofing
and Sheet Metal Contractors), 3479 (Metal Coating and Allied Services), 3499 (Fabricated
Metal Products), 3544 (Special Dies, Tools, Jigs, and Fixtures), 3679 (Electronic Components
not elsewhere classified), 7216 (Dry Cleaning Plants) and 7699 (Repair Services not
elsewhere classified). All the above industries are in the top 20% of the IBER ranking,
employ over 500 people in Santa Clara County, consist overwhelmingly of firms with under
50 employees, and have over half their total workforce employed in such firms. Those
industries with a large total employment base and a large number of establishments,
especially those with no fixed location (e.g. SIC 1761) require a significantly
different approach than a large employer with a single fixed location. This problem is
clearly not unique to Santa Clara county. CAL/OSHA should consider a meeting or
conference on approaches to small industry which would of necessity include health
educators, health care providers to a particular geographic area, industry and labor
representatives, in order to develop a comprehensive strategy on small business. Our
analysis suggests that there have been very high exposures to highly toxic materials
identified in these industries and they identified in firms in these industries and
they should not be excluded because of their size.
5.3. Recommendations for Special Research Related to the Semiconductor Industry (SIC
3674).
5.3.1 Background.
The electronic component manufacturing industry is a focus of our recommendations
for research for the following reasons:
a) The electronics industry is very large in Santa Clara County and it is anticipated
that the industry will continue to grow in the future.
b) The vast majority of other industries in Santa Clara County are amenable to the
intervention and surveillance activities of CAL/OSHA and the County of Santa
Clara. Most of the industries employ many fewer people and the problems are
reasonably well recognized.
c) The electronics industry has the potential to be a model of preventive
occupational health practice which could affect the development of occupational
health programs in other newly developing or rebuilding industries. Some of the
approaches taken already by the larger industries represent important innovations
in occupational health management.
-XXXVlll-
-------
d) As a rapidly changing industry with a high degree of technological innovation
there is always the concern that new techniques for manufacturing may have the
potential for significant health problems. Constant surveillance and research
therefore is an important element in assessing potential problems.
e) There is oft expressed public concern about the potential for accidents and
numerous anecdotal reports of illness, especially associated with solvent exposure,
acid and base exposure, arsenic exposure, toxic gas use, epoxy resins and
cellosolves in the electronics industry. There have been particular concerns raised
around reproductive toxicity. In our view, there need to be hazard and illness
surveillance systems established which address these concerns and anecdotal
reports. Further research to assess the scope and magnitude of these potential
problems is appropriate. The development of this industrial base is very
important to the county and significant effort needs to occur to develop the most
progressive approaches to hazard control such that public and worker concerns
are addressed and that existing problems are dealt with systematically in both the
short and long term.
5.3.2 Semiconductor Industry Recommendations.
5.3.2.1 The county health department should attempt to initiate epidemiological
studies of the semiconductor industry, perhaps in cooperation with health
care providers or appropriate federal and state agencies.
Epidemiological studies designed to assess the risks due to chemical exposure in
electronics industry SICs, perhaps in cooperation with Kaiser or other health care providers
should be considered. The County may wish to request research studies from NIOSH, the
Occupational Health Centers or the Department of Health Services. From an epidemiologic
standpoint there is little to no data available on the problems facing workers in these
industries.
5.3.2.2 Neurobehavioral screening should be used to assess solvent exposure effects.
Neurobehavioral screening studies designed to assess the impact of solvent exposure on
the central nervous system in solvent exposed workers should be considered. We received
numerous anecdotal reports from physicians, industrial hygienists and workers themselves
on neurobehavioral problems associated with solvent exposure. Since exposure levels are
generally well within standards in these industries, there is concern that current standards
may be inadequate or that significant dermal exposure may be occurring. Numerous
industries throughout the U.S. have solvent exposure problems and therefore the selection
of the most appropriate cohort is an important methodological issue. In our view,
neurotoxicology and neuroepidemiology of the solvents used in these industries represents
an important, unresolved research issue.
5.3.2.3 The county should research means of addressing chemical burns in the industry.
Chemical burns account for a significant proportion of physicians' first reports of
injury in this industry. Further research on the control, minimization, and treatment of
-xxxix-
-------
chemical burns should be an area of follow-up by the county.
5.3.2.4 Biological monitoring requirements should be considered for this industry.
Review of the chemicals used in the industry should be conducted for the express
purpose of identifying whether any biological monitoring requirements should be considered
specifically for this industry.
5.3.2.5 Toxicological mechanisms of Cellosolve solvents and exposure levels of these
solvents in the semiconductor industry require further study.
Cellosolve solvents used in the industry have raised concerns among electronics
workers and their advocates. The reproductive toxicity of "cellosolves" does not appear to
derive from mutagenicity or other irreversible biological processes. Further research by
NIOSH needs to be conducted on the mechanism of the reproductive toxicity of these
compounds with particular attention being given to the establishment of safe levels of
exposure. In this regard, additional characterization of exposure levels in this industry is
appropriate. A joint effort between NIOSH, CAL/OSHA and the County would be
conducted. The cellosolves have low vapor pressures, and therefore attention should be
focused on the prevention of skin contact. Substitution of a less toxic solvent would be an
appropriate, even preferred, approach to the control of Cellosolve exposure. If it is
determined that substitution is not viable, then the State of California needs to consider
how to address reproductive toxins especially as a matter of policy. There are currently no
guidelines at the state or federal level on approaches to the regulation of reproductive
toxins.
5.3.2.6 Assiduous exposure monitoring is critical and should include maintenance, cleanup,
and repair operations.
Our recommendations for the requirement for environmental monitoring with
subsequent reporting and computerization by state or local agencies of the data are
appropriate to certain chemicals in use in these industries, e.g., arsenic, cellosolves and
other solvents. Monitoring of exposures during maintenance, cleanup, and repair operations
is particularly relevant. This would appear to be especially true in a highly complex
industry of this type where acute exposures are possible during equipment failure.
Continuous monitoring of arsenic levels would appear to be a high priority.
5.3.2.7 Research into toxic exposures from ion-implantation processes should
continue.
Ion-implantation processes also require further research of the type described by
Ungers et al, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 46(8), 416-420 (1985).
5.3.2.8 Santa Clara County should address anecdotal reports of illness in the industry.
Exposure levels to toxic chemicals in these industries tend to be very low when they
are measured, but nonetheless there are numerous anecdotal reports of illness. There
have been often stated concerns that acute exposures during accidental releases may
have had important health consequences. We recommend the Santa Clara Department of
-xl-
-------
Health take the lead role in evaluating the existence and severity of these reports.
The County should attempt to involve the clinical community in the County, including
the occupational medicine clinic of the Valley Medical Center. Health care providers
represent an important resource for identification and clinical evaluation of illness;
in IEMP Phase 2, a concerted effort should be made to involve this important segment
of the Community. Representatives from industry, the Santa Clara Department of Health,
health care providers, and NIOSH should develop a mechanism for tracking possible work
related complaints to confirm the accuracy of the anecdotal reports.
5.3.2.9 Industry and local agencies must continue to assess the potential for catastrophic
accidents.
An assessment of the potential for catastrophic events associated with toxic chemical
explosions, leaks or spills is not within the scope of this report. However, the issue of
chemical storage, chemical use (amounts), emergency response planning, and other related
issues should be the focus of further study. We were impressed with the efforts of some
of the large electronics employers in the county in this area, but we believe a
comprehensive evaluation including both large and small employers is important.
-xli-
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
2-1 Functional Chart of the CM/OSHA Program 14
2-2 Functional Chart of the California Division of Occupational
Safety and Health 15
2-3 California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Field
Operations in Northern California: County Boundaries for
Regions I and H 17
5.1-1 Steps in Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication 90
-xlii-
-------
LIST OF TABLES
4-1 Inspections and Test Samples in OSHA Inspection Data: SIC 2812
Alkalies and Chlorine ................................................ 51
4-2 Comparison of NIOSH and OSHA Industry Indexes Using NOHS for
Exposure Data [[[ 53
4-3 Coiparison of Top Ranked SIC's in OSHA Weighted Index (CWI) and
NIOSH's Industrial Risk Index (IKE) .................................. 54
4-4 Exanples of SIC's with High Ranks in Inspection-Based Exposure
Rankings (IBER's) [[[ 55
4-5 Santa dara County Industries Ranked by Employment (>300) with
CWI, IRI, and IBER Hazard Rankings ................................... 57
4-6 Seventy-five Industries with Highest IBER Ranks, with Alternate
Hazard Rankings and Santa Clara County Enployment .................... 62
4-7 Industries Not Inclined in High IBER Ranking with High Exposures
for Selected Substances .............................................. 66
4-8 Industries Ranked in Top 20% of Industrial Risk Index (IKE) .......... 68
4-9 Industries Ranked in Top 20% of OSHA Weighted Index (CWI) ............ 70
4-10 Worker Overexposure Citations in Santa Clara County, from
CAL/OSHA Inspection Files 1979-84 .................................... 75
4-11 Industries Ranked Potentially Hazardous in Santa Clara County
by Federal OSHA/NIOSH Data paggg ..................................... 77
4-12 Substances Contributing to High IBER Ranks for Selected SIC ' s ........ 79
5.1-1 NIOSH National Exposure Survey (NOES) as of January 17, 1986 for
SIC 3674 , Sardconductors and Related Devices ......................... 91
5.1-2 Potential Occupational Exposures and Exposure Situations in the
Semiconductor Industry, as Identified by the CAL/OSHA Semicon-
ductor Industry Study, 1981 ............ '. ............................. 99
5.1-3 A List of Cannon Materials Used or Generated in the Manufac-
ture of Semiconductors ............................................... 100
5.1-4 Federal OSHA Semiconductor Industry Inspections: Substances with
Sample Exposures at or Above 50% of the OSHA EEL ..................... 106
5.1-5 Substances Monitored in Eight NIOSH HHE's for SIC 3674, 1977-85 ...... 108
5.1-6 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry, 1981: Substances with Monitored
-------
5.1-7 CAL/OSHA Monitoring Data from Inspections of Ten Santa Clara
County Finns, 1979-84 112
5.2-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NCHS Inventory by Weighted Index:
SIC 3679, Electronic Conponents 120
5.2-2 NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) as of
January 17, 1986 for SIC 3679, Electronic Conponents Not
Elsewhere Classified 122
5.2-3 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3679: Substances with
Sanpled Exposures at or above 50% of the OSHA PEL 134
5.2-4 CAI/GSHA Inspection Data: Substances Encountered and Exposure
Monitoring Results in SIC 3679 - Fifteen Inspections (1978-84) 135
5.3-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NCHS Inventory by Weighted Index:
SIC 3079, Miscellaneous Plastics Products 142
5.3-2 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3079: Substances with
Sanpled Exposures at or Above 50% of the OSHA PEL 144
5.4-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NOHS Inventory by Weighted Index:
SIC 3471, Electroplating 148
5.4-2 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3471: Substances with
Sanpled Exposures at or Above 50% of the OSHA PEL 150
5.5-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NOHS Inventory by Weighted Index:
SIC 8060, Hospitals 155
5.6-1 Substances Encountered and Exposure Monitoring Results for FMC
Corporation (Military Vehicle Manufacture) in CAL/OSHA Inspec-
tions, 1979-84 160
-xliv-
-------
LEST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Environmental Monitoring Methods A-l
Appendix 2 Examples of Biological Monitoring A-4
Appendix 3.1 Key CAI/OSHA Standards Applicable to Ocapational Health in
Santa Clara County A-7
Appendix 3.2 Health Effects of Selected Substances Regulated Under
CAI/OSHA GISO 5155 -Airborne Contaminants A-U
Appendix 3.3 CAI/CSHA GISO 5155 - Airborne Contaminants (Complete
Standard) A-17
Appendix 3.4 CAI/OSHA Standards Regulating Carcinogens A-32
Appendix 4 Santa Clara County Employment by Size of Establishment
Workforce A-35
Appendix 5 Exposures to Hazardous Substances in Selected Industries with
High Santa Clara County Employment, As shown by Federal OSHA
Inspection Data A-49
Appendix 6 Industrial Hygiene Field Operations Manual (IHFOM) Hazardous
Substance Code Numbers A-100
Appendix 7 Hazardous Substances in Selected Industries by Weighted Index . A-117
Appendix 8 NIOSH Documents Related to Selected Industries with High
Santa dara County Employment A-229
Appendix 9 Registered Carcinogen Users in Santa Clara County A-293
Appendix 10 Resources and Data Directory for Occupational Health A-300
Appendix 11 A Key to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes A-322
Appendix 12 Sairple from Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance
Data in the City of Santa Clara A-339
-xlv-
-------
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
CAL/OSHA
EPA
DFA
DLSR
DIR
DOHS
DOSH
HESIS
IBER
IRI
MIS
NIOSH
NOES
NOHS
OSHA
OWI
EEL
RTECS
SIC
TWA
California Occupational Safety and Health Administraticsn Program
Environmental Protection Agency
California Depac bnent of Food and Agriculture
Division of labor Statistics and Research (in DIR)
California Department of Industrial Relations
California Department of Health Services
Division of Occupational Safety and Health (in DIR)
Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service (in DOHS)
Inspection Based Exposure Rankings
Integrated Environmental Management Project
Industry Risk Index
Federal OSHA Management Information System
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
National Occupational Exposure Survey
National Occupational Hazard Survey
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (federal)
OSHA Weighted Index
Permissible Exposure Level
Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances
Standard Industrial Classification
Time Weighted Average
-xlvi-
-------
GLOSSARY OF MEASUREMENT ABBREVIATIONS
mg/m3 - milligrams of contaminant per cubic meter of air
ug/m3 - micrograms of contaminant per cubic meter of air
ppm - parts of contaminant per million parts of air
ppb - parts of contaminant per billion parts of air
-xlvii-
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The following report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of contract
number 68-01-7002 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This report represents
an assessment of available information on occupational exposures within Santa Clara
Valley, California, and was conducted as a companion piece to the- first phase of EPA's
Integrated Environmental Management Project (IEMP). The IEMP is a broad assessment of
health risks from "toxic pollutants" and of methods to manage those risks.
The decision to assess workplace exposures within the Santa Clara Valley was made by
the lEMP's Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee and Public Advisory Committee.
The purpose of the work is to provide a context for the environmental risk findings which
the IEMP is developing in Santa Clara County, and to provide local elected officials and
other interested parties with a means of tying the two sets of issues (environmental and
occupational) together. Based on a preliminary assessment of the type and quality of
available data, the IEMP, in consultation with its advisory committees, concluded that this
study should focus on qualitative analysis of occupational exposures and risks, rather than
a quantitative risk assessment within that context, the report was to include:
a) Descriptions of federal, state, and local agencies responsible for analyzing
workplace exposures, and for setting and enforcing standards;
b) A discussion of the methods for setting standards, and a compilation of the
standards;
c) A description of the past and ongoing research on workplace exposures in indus-
tries prevalent in Santa Clara County;
d) A qualitative discussion of the substances to which workers in Santa Clara Count\
industries may be exposed, and the possible order of magnitude of those exposures:
and descriptions of further possible research.
This report follows that prescribed outline.
The report has certain limitations that derive directly from rankings of industry
within Santa Clara County according to their potential for using hazardous chemicals
and/or having a history of significant workplace exposures. The rankings were developed
using federal OSHA and NIOSH data sources and do not derive from California or Santa
Clara County data; there are no data available at the state or local level which would
enable a ranking of industries according to severity of hazards present or even enable an
assessment of chemicals and exposures. Therefore, the rankings generated in this report
must be understood in that context. Projections for Santa Clara County were made b\
analyzing the county's employment patterns and applying priority rankings (based on
federal OSHA inspection results) to the county data. Further investigations to assess the
accuracy of these projections are clearly in order to determine if they are truly reflective
of industries in Santa Clara County. We know of no reasons why the data derived from
federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sources should not be
relevant to California, but given the age of information from the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) there may be flaws, especially for those industries
which have emerged since the early 1970s.
-1-
-------
possible every man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to
preserve our human resources." To carry out this goal, the Act established several
agencies, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Occupational Safety
and Health Review Commission, and the National Advisory Committee on Occupational
Safety and Health (NACOSH). The most important of these agencies for purposes of this
report are OSHA and NIOSH, these being the agencies responsible for characterizing and
regulating workplace health hazards. NIOSH is discussed in a separate section below.
OSHA is housed within the U.S. Department of Labor, and vested with broad authorit;
to regulate workplace conditions to prevent occupational illness and injury. The agency
has jurisdiction over all U.S. employers and their employees, except for state and local
governments in their role as employers, federal agencies, and workplaces already protected
by other federal agencies and statutes. Workplaces covered by other agencies include
nuclear facilities, regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; pesticide application,
regulated by the Department of Agriculture; and mining and milling, regulated by the
Mine Safety and Health Administration.
OSHA also does not directly regulate workplaces in those states, such as California,
which are approved by federal OSHA to run thein own occupational safety and health
programs; OSHA, however, does continue to monitor such programs. Circumstances under
which OSHA allows states to run their own programs are discussed further below. All
references to "OSHA" in this report denote the federal agency; the California state program
is always referred to as "CAL/OSHA".
2.2.1 Functions of OSHA
OSHA protects worker health in three principal ways: 1) through enforcement of
existing occupational health and safety standards, 2) through the development of new or
revised standards, and 3) through consultation and education services for employers and
employees.
2.2.1.1 Enforcement
OSHA's most direct impact on workplace conditions is through the on-site inspection c:
workplaces. Health related ("industrial Hygiene") inspections are generally performed as a
result of employee complaints, but they may also be conducted on OSHA's initiative.
OSHA also investigates accidents (e.g. chemical spills in the workplace). Examples of
OSHA investigations which have been performed on specific target industries include
foundries and coke ovens.
OSHA Inspections
OSHA inspectors are authorized by the OSH Act to enter workplaces without giving
prior notice of the inspection to the employer. Employers have the right to refuse entr>
to an OSHA inspector if the inspector has not yet obtained a warrant, but entry is not
routinely refused.
The inspection may include every part of the workplace, even areas not implicated in
the original complaint. An employee representative has the right to accompany the OSHA
inspector during the inspection (known as the "walkaround" right). During a health
-3-
-------
OSHA on May 29, 1971, promulgated a standards package incorporating existing federal
safety and health standards, and consensus standards adopted by independent professional
organizations. Though this standards package was dominated by safety related standards, it
also established Permissible Exposure Levels (PEL's) for approximately 450 workplace
chemicals. These PEL'S were based on the 1968 "threshold limit values" (TLV's) previously
established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), an
association composed of professional industrial hygiene personnel in government or
educational institutions. The TLV's are considered by ACGIH to represent levels of
exposure to toxic agents below which most workers will not experience toxic effect, even
if exposed an average of 8 hours a day over a working lifetime; they are not intended by
ACGIH to denote absolutely safe exposures. Some health-related consensus standards in the
1971 package were also adopted from another consensus organization, the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI).
ACGIH reviews its TLV's on a yearly basis. Since 1971, ACGIH has revised many of
its TLV's, and has added TLV's for additional substances. These revisions and changes are
not reflected in the PEL'S specified by OSHA based on the old ACGIH TLV's. Federal
OSHA does not routinely "update" the PEL'S as ACGIH revisions are made. Thus, many
current OSHA exposure limits for toxic substances do not reflect current toxicologic
knowledge. This problem does not exist in California, as will be discussed.
Comprehensive Standards
After adopting the consensus standards in 1971, OSHA proceeded to develop more
comprehensive standards for specific identified hazards, as well as methods for establishing
standards-setting priorities. To date, OSHA has promulgated 25 comprehensive health
standards for a number of chemical and physical hazards, such as lead, cotton dust and
asbestos. These standards generally contain provisions concerning most aspects of use and
handling of the hazard (hence the term "comprehensive"), including, depending on the
standard, exposure limits, types of exposure controls, worker training, exposure monitoring
requirements, medical examinations for workers, storage, disposal, and record-keeping
requirements. The scope of such standards contrasts with the Air Contaminants Standard.
which essentially prescribes only permissible exposure levels.
It can readily be seen from the number of standards adopted after 1971 that the vast
majority of OSHA-regulated toxic substances are not covered by a comprehensive standard.
and are addressed only by the Air Contaminant PEL's. Even including the air contaminants
standard, the number of OSHA-regulated toxic substances -- about 460 -- is far less than
the total number of such substances present in workplaces.
The OSH Act contains detailed requirements for standards development, modification
or revocation. Standards setting or other action, (e.g. modification can be initiated as a
result of OSHA's own determination that a standard is necessary, of research or recommen-
dations by NIOSH (see NIOSH), or petitions by other federal, state or local agencies,
employers organizations, unions, or any interested person. OSHA standards-setting proce-
dures involve public hearings and participation of all interested parties. Before standards
can be issued, the proposed standard must be published by OSHA in the Federal Register
for public review and comment.
All of OSHA's comprehensive standards were developed through the prescribed proce-
dures. Changes in Air Contaminants PEL's would also necessarily be subjected to these
procedures. However, as the initial adoption of ACGIH TLV's in 1971 was exempted from
-5-
-------
2.2.1.3 Education and Consultation
OSHA has promulgated as standards, or as parts of standards, numerous requirements
designed to inform workers of the toxic substances to which they are exposed and the
hazards associated with them. These requirements are based on the precept that workers
have a right to such information as a condition of employment, and that disclosure is vital
to the effective prevention of occupational disease. All workers are guaranteed access to
their medical records and to monitored exposure levels in the work area (e.g., measurements
of air concentrations); and workers must be supplied with information on the names and
toxic properties of any toxic substances to which they may be exposed.
Also, the OSH Act requires that consultation services be provided to employers, and
employees "as an effective means of preventing occupational injuries and illnesses." In 19~5.
OSHA entered into contracts with states without approved occupational safety and health
plans (see below) to provide on-site consultation to employers about how they could comph
with OSHA standards and regulations. States with their own OSHA programs also receive
federal funding to maintain on-site consultation programs. (California maintains one such
program; see "CAL/OSHA").
2.2.2 State Plans
Under Section 18 of the OSH Act, states can submit to OSHA plans for developing
and enforcing their own occupational safety and health standards. If the plan is
approved, the state assumes primary responsibility for protecting the safety and health of
its workers. OSHA in general does not inspect work places in states with approved plans.
though it is legally able to do so.
In order for a state plan to be approved, it must be "at least as effective" as federal
OSHA. Specifically, the plan must
a) designate specific agency or agencies as responsible for administering the plan;
b) provide for development of standards "at least as effective" as those of Federal
OSHA;
c) provide for enforcement of standards "at least as effective" as that of Federal
OSHA, including right of entry and a prohibition on advance notice of inspection;
d) show that the designated agency or agencies will have enough qualified personnel
and proper legal authority to carry out their duties, and receive adequate funding.
e) require employers to make reports to OSHA as otherwise required by the OSH Act:
f) provide for protection of state workers;
g) provide that the state will make reports to OSHA as OSHA requires; and
h) allow workers to participate in cases involving empbyer appeals of penalties or
abatement deadlines and to appeal state actions related to safety and health.
-7-
-------
a) Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's). HHE's are conducted at the request of an
authorized employee representative or, of the employer. They are designed to
determine whether substances found at a particular worksite pose a health threat to
workers, given the nature of their use. HHE's typically involve monitoring
exposures to the suspected toxic agents, review of cases of worker illness, and
recommendations for abating any found hazards.
Requests for HHE's can be sent either to the NIOSH Division of Surveillance
office in Cincinnati, or to the appropriate NIOSH regional office. The Region IX
office in San Francisco estimates that approximately ten HHE's have been con-
ducted for Santa Clara County in the past nine years.
The Technical Assistance report is a less formal version of an HHE, and is typi-
cally generated by a letter from an employer requesting assistance with a particular
problem. Following an investigation, a letter is sent from NIOSH to the employer
stating findings and recommendations.
b) Control Technology (CT) studies. CT studies are initiated by NIOSH to evaluate
techniques used to control health hazards. These studies focus on a particular
industry, industrial process, or control technique. Though the emphasis in CT
studies is on control techniques, work processes and associated hazards are also
evaluated, to enable identification of major opportunities for exposure. Exposure
sampling is extensively performed to evaluate the potentials for hazardous exposure
and the effectiveness of control methods in place. CT studies are conducted by the
Engineering Control Technology Program, based in Cincinnati.
c) Industrywide (IW) studies. Industrywide studies are designed to determine whether
specific occupational exposures of certain worker groups are associated with adverse
health effects. They involve epidemiological analysis of disease in a given worker
population, combined with exposure sampling. Walk-through survey reports
document short (1-2 day) surveys at plant sites to evaluate their suitability for
industry-wide studies, and contain limited or no exposure monitoring data. In-depth
survey reports document detailed exposure information obtained during a survey of
a plant site, and usually contain extensive air monitoring data. Industrywide
studies are performed by the Division of Surveillance, Health Evaluation and Field
Studies based in Cincinnati.
In addition to the above studies, NIOSH contracts with outside organizations to
conduct "Extent of Exposure Surveys". These surveys attempt to define the nature
and extent of worker exposures to given hazards in selected occupations and
industries. About 900 industrial hygiene surveys have done for extent-of-exposure
studies, with about 10 being comprehensive (e.g. Worker Exposure to PCE in the
Dry-Cleaning Industry). These studies typically document exposures by industry and
job-type, describe monitoring procedures and current exposure controls, and provide
toxicologic data.
2.3.2 Collection of Data on Hazards Present in U.S. Industries
NIOSH has gathered a great quantity of information regarding both the toxicity of
hazardous substances, and degree to which various occupational health hazards are present
in the workplace. These data provide the basis for surveillance of workers in industries
-9-
-------
The monitoring methods in the manual are those generally used by NIOSH in conducting
its own workplace investigations, and in state and federal OSHA program inspections.
2.3.4. Research and Standards Recommendations.
NIOSH has formulated a list of priority toxic substances and physical agents, based on
high degree of hazard and number of workers exposed, which forms the basis of other
research, including laboratory studies (e.g. animal studies). On the basis of investigations
of specific hazards, NIOSH recommends exposure limits and appropriate control techniques
to OSHA. These .recommendations, known as Criteria Documents, often serve as a scien-
tific basis for OSHA standards development. Criteria documents are meant to be objective
scientific assessments regarding an agent's toxic effects and the exposure levels which
produce them. As such, these recommendations can be more stringent than the correspond-
ing OSHA standards, which must take into account the feasibility of control requirements.
Employers are legally bound only to follow the OSHA standards.
Usually issued by the Criteria Documentation Division, Criteria Documents include
recommendations for a permissible exposure level, i.e., the concentration of a substance in
the occupational environment that will not cause adverse health effects in exposed workers.
and also recommendations for personal protective equipment, control measures, work
practices, sanitation, hazard notification, medical surveillance, and recordkeeping. NIOSH
publishes these documents (over 125 to date) after critically evaluating all known and
available epidemiological, biological, industrial hygiene, engineering, chemical, and trade
data and other information that may be relevant to recommending a standard. Production
data are taken from EPA. Exposure data for industries and occupations are taken from
the NOHS.
2.3.5 Education of Industrial Hygienists and Other Occupational Safety and Health
Professionals.
NIOSH is charged, under Section 21 of the OSH Act, to conduct education programs t;
provide an adequate supply of qualified personnel to carry out the purposes of the Act.
The Region IX office in San Francisco, with jurisdiction over Santa Clara County, offers
seminars to health professionals in training at UC Berkeley, and contributes to the
Occupational Medicine Residency Program at UC San Francisco Medical School.
NIOSH also publishes a wide range of special reports and papers concerning occupa-
tional health and safety issues.
2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
The relevance of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to this section of the
IEMP report lies in its administration of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA i
Under TSCA, manufacturers are required to submit a premanufacturing notice (MPN) to
EPA prior to initiating either manufacture of a new chemical, or undertaking significant
new use of any of 8 chemicals. EPA notification must include company name, chemical
name, amount to be manufactured and several other items of information, on which basis
the -EPA may limit, regulate or prohibit manufacture. Importers and exporters are subject
to similar requirements. PMN's that are approved are added to the TSCA Inventory of
-11-
-------
ture (through the California Occupational Safety and Health Act, CAL. LABOR CODE
Sees. 6300-6330) in 1972. This program, known as CAL/OSHA, covers all of the state's
workers except those employed by the federal government, or protected by other federal or
state agencies (e.g., pesticide applicators, who are protected by the state Department of
Food and Agriculture.).
CAL/OSHA's responsibilities essentially mirror those of Federal OSHA: they include
standards development, standards enforcement, and education and consultation services for
employers and employees with regard to workplace hazards and hazard control. Most
CAL/OSHA functions are carried out by divisions of the Department of Industrial Rela-
tions (DIR); there is not actually an agency called "CAL/OSHA". The major functional
components of the CAL/OSHA Program under DIR are the Division of Occupational Safer.
and Health, the Consultation Service, the Standards Board, and the Appeals Board. See
Figure 2-1. Some CAL/OSHA activities are performed by the Department of Health Ser-
vices through interagency agreements with DIR.
This section will briefly describe components of the CAL/OSHA program, and discuss
in greater detail CAL/OSHA compliance activity in Santa Clara County.
2.5.1 Components of the CAL/OSHA program.
2.5.1.1 CAL/OSHA Program Office.
This office is responsible for coordinating CAL/OSHA activities with federal OSHA.
It is in the Department of Industrial Relations, and is responsible to the DIR Director.
2.5.1.2 The Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board.
The Standards Board is responsible for all authoritative decisions regarding occupa-
tional health and safety standards in California. Discussion of its functions, and of the
manner in which standards are produced, is contained in a separate section of this report,
titled "Measurement and Evaluation of Occupational Exposure". The Standards Board is an
independent unit within the Department of Industrial Relations.
2.5.1.3 The Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH)
DOSH is responsible for enforcing Cal/OSHA standards by means of workplace inspec-
tions, and for assisting with health standards development in cooperation with the
Standards Board. DOSH is housed in the State's Department of Industrial Relations (DIR).
DOSH is administered by a Chief and two Deputy Chiefs appointed by the Governor.
DOSH itself is composed of several sub-units with diverse responsibilities, as can be
seen in Figure 2-2. Key sub-units related to occupational health include:
Field Compliance (Regional. District and Field Offices).
Most CAL/OSHA health inspections, particularly those in response to worker com-
plaints, are conducted by DOSH industrial hygienists based in 20 district offices through-
out the state. In addition to the district offices, there are seven "field offices" with more
-13-
-------
DIVISION 0» UVUI-ATIUNAI SAKETt ANT1 HtALTH
CIIIFI
^^^
• EMC I MCE H INC
I SERVICES
k
wLVATORS
I
• STA»T
• SERVICES
ItRESSUHE VESSELS I
< MINING
and
TUNNELING
NANAGEHCrtT
" INFORMATION
-j COMMUNICATIONS
1
J EMPLOYEE
| EDUCATION
- PERSONNEL
- TRAINING
I
1 tCAL jnj
BOI
1
1
I ILLU OhtRAI (Oil,
orpuTY cnirr
•
REGION 1 1
San f r anc 1 «co 1
-I Sani a Rold
-1 San Franc laco 1
| Berkeley
•I S«n Mateo
j San Jos« 1
|
|
KEG ION II
S*crdfM*ni o
' Rrdd i nq 1
SacraBvnlo
Concord
:
Hodralo
t'rrano 1
JExcapi 1
I 1
RUGION III
Sani a Ana
J Sani a Ana
• Sani a TV
1 San
| ll<-cnardino
1 San Oi»ni ur a 1
HEALTH end
TECHNICAL
SERVICES
OtfUTT CKIEf
. 1]
RESEARCH and
- STANDARDS
DEVELOPMENT
OCCUPATIONAL
" CANCER
CONTROL
^ RADIATION
HFDICAL
SERVICES
SPECIAL
STUDIES
RIGHT TO
"" IINOW
Figure 2-2
California Division of Occupational Safety and Health
-------
Figure 2-3
California" Division of Occupational Safety and Health
Field Operations 1n Northern California:
County Boundaries for Regions I and II
legion I
San Francisco
District 5
Santa Rosa
(UJdah)
District
Berkeley
(Concord)
District 1
Ł*n Francisco
(San Mateo)
District 2
San Jose
(Salinas)
Region II
Sacram-nto
District 3
Redding
(ChicoJ
(ZLreka)
District 1
Sacramento
District U
Modesto
(Stockton)
District 5
Fresno
-17-
-------
Research and Standards Development.
The DOSH Research and Standards Development unit drafts new health standards for
presentation to the Standards Board, and reviews existing standards for needed changes.
The unit also reviews new federal OSHA standards, and serves as an information source on
standards for the public. Safety-related standards are developed by the Standards Board
itself. The unit consists of four filled industrial hygienist positions.
Rieht-to-Know (RTK) Unit.
This unit is responsible for MSDS's (Material Safety Data Sheets) received by DOSH
from manufacturers of hazardous substances, as required by the Hazardous Substances
Information and Training Act (Sections 6360-6399 of the California Labor Code). Under
the Hazardous Substances Information and Training Act, all manufacturers of hazardous
materials, as defined by the Act, which are sold to California employers, must file a
Material Safety Data Sheet with DOSH, and supply the MSDS to all employers using the
substance. Those employers must in turn supply the information to their employees. The
MSDS contains data on the physical properties and hazardous health effects of the sub-
stance, as well as other data. The RTK unit is in the process of checking received MSDS's
for accuracy and completeness, and computerizing some of the data. The unit also helps
field staff interpret and enforce the Right To Know law, and assists manufacturers,
employers, employees and the public in understanding the law. The unit consists of two
industrial hygienists, and one senior industrial hygienist who divides his time between this
unit and the carcinogen unit (OCCU).
2.5.1.4 The Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board.
The Appeals Board is a quasi-judicial body which resolves disputes arising from
CAL/OSHA program enforcement. The Board is an entity within the Department of Indus-
trial Relations and consists of three members appointed by the Governor, with one repre-
senting management, one labor, and one the general public. Administrative Law Judges
employed by the Appeals Board hear and rule on appeals regarding citations, penalties, anc!
abatement dates arising from enforcement of CAL/OSHA standards and regulations. The
Board has the authority to deny an appeal, and to reconsider the ruling of the Administra-
tive Law Judge. The Board can reduce or void citations or penalties, and extend or alter
abatement dates. In some cases, an abatement date is suspended pending a ruling from the
Board.
2.5.1.5 The CAL/OSHA Consultation Service.
The Consultation Service is a division of DIR. It offers free consultation to
employers to encourage voluntary compliance with CAL/OSHA occupational health and
safety standards. The consultation service is housed in the Department of Industrial
Relations, but is kept strictly separate from the compliance operations of DOSH. The
Consultation Service offers information, advice, and recommendations on specific safety or
health problems at a workplace. It will also help employers initiate an effective accident
and illness prevention program or improve an existing program, and will provide training
in safety and health practices on the job and in recognition and correction of hazards.
The consultation service will also consult with an employer on appropriate action to
remove or control an existing hazard. There is no referral to compliance officers as a
result of any consultation service activity, except in cases where an employer refuses to
-19-
-------
Components of the Northern Occupational Health Center include the Occupational
Health Clinic at UC San Francisco, which treats persons with suspected occupational
disease and provides some medical surveillance related to lead, asbestos, and other hazards.
and the Labor Occupational Health Program at UC Berkeley, which provides training ses-
sions, publications, films, and technical assistance on occupational health and safety issues,
and maintains an extensive library on standards and regulations, toxicology, hazard
identification, and related topics. (Two other similar components are at UC Davis -- the
Occupational and Environmental Medicine Clinic, and the Northern California Occupational
and Environmental Health Unit.)
2.5.1.8 Air and Industrial Hygiene Laboratory.
The laboratory is in the Laboratory Division of the Department of Health Services.
Through an interagency agreement, the Laboratory supports DOSH field compliance activity
through analysis of air samples taken during inspections.
2.5.2 CAL/OSHA Compliance Activity in Santa Clara County
Compliance activity for Santa Clara county is conducted, as noted, from the Region I.
District 2 office in San Jose. This office currently employs four industrial hygienists
(IH's), and nine Safety Engineers. The office has been consistently staffed by four
industrial hygienists since 1981, except during the latter half of 1985, when IH staffing
temporarily was reduced to three, senior IH was transferred to a newly opened office in
Concord.
As of March 1986, the San Jose office was administered by an Acting District Man-
ager, Milton Terry. The Regional Manager was John Tennyson.
The present staff of four IH's is less than the number of positions presently allocated
to the San Jose office by the state staffing formula: based on complaint volume, this
formula has designated San Jose as requiring six IH's. In fiscal year 1985, the San Jose
office received a total of 846 complaints of which approximately 30.3% were health
complaints, with about 8.3% involving both health and safety problems. (According to the
District office, these figures are consistent with previous years.) One additional industrial
hygienist has been hired by the office and is due to begin work sometime in Spring 1986.
The future of the sixth position was not clear as of March 1986.
As noted above, the IH's in the San Jose office are responsible for compliance health
inspections in Santa Cruz, Monterey, and San Bonito Counties, in addition to Santa Clara.
However, about 80% of inspections by the office are conducted in Santa Clara County.
Inspection figures for the San Jose District office were obtained directly from the
District Office for fiscal years 1983 (July 1982 - June 1983) and 1984 (July 1983 - June
1984).
In fiscal year 1983, the San Jose Office conducted 119 total industrial hygiene
inspections, 59 of which resulted in the issuance of a citation or information memorandum
In fiscal year 1984, the office conducted a total of 134 industrial hygiene inspections, 52
of which resulted in a citation or information memorandum. In both years, approximate!}
60-75% of the inspections were in Santa Clara County. Thus, in fiscal year 1983, between
approximately 72 and 90 industrial hygiene inspections took place in Santa Clara County;
and in fiscal year 1984, this total was between 80 and 100. Exact figures were not
available from the District Office. Computer data from the DOSH Management Informa-
-21-
-------
If, upon inspection, DOSH industrial hygienists encounter violations, they are
empowered to issue citations ordering the hazard to be abated within a set period of time
Citations must be approved by the District Manager, who also determines the amount of
any penalties assessed.
Penalty structures are contained in Title 8 of rhe California Administrative Code,
Section 336. They include:
Regulatory Violation: to $1,000.
General Violation: to $1,000.
Serious Violation: to $2,000.
Carcinogen-Failure to Register: $500.
Carcinogen-Serious: $1,000., no adjustment
Failure to Abate: to $1,000. per day (general and regulatory).
to $2,000. per day (serious).
Repeat: first repeat - 2 times previous penalty.
second repeat - 4 times previous penalty.
third repeat - 10 times previous penalty,
up to $10,000 (general) or $20,000 (serious).
Willful: to $10,000 general and regulatory
to $20,000 serious.
An employer may be cited for up to ten general or regulatory violations (per
inspection) without being assessed financial penalties. Serious violations always entail
financial penalties. In the case of serious violations, the district office can also notify the
Bureau of Investigations for possible referral of the case for criminal prosecution. In
practice, however, criminal penalties have seldom been used in cases of health and safety
violations.
In addition to citations for violations of existing standards, DOSH can issue informa-
tion memoranda, special orders, and notices. An information memorandum is not a
citation, but instructs the employer to attend to a situation which has the potential for
becoming hazardous in the future. A Special Order is an order to abate a hazard for
which there is no existing standard, and applies only to the specific worksite for which it
is written. In effect, it is an ad hoc standard to address a hazard at a particular place of
employment. A special order must be followed like any other standard; failure to comply
will result in a citation. The power to write special orders is the CAL/OSHA equivalent
of the federal OSHA "General Duty Clause". A notice is issued in lieu of a citation for
violations with no direct effect on the health or safety of employees. (In practice, notices
are rarely issued.)
If there is an imminent hazard to worker health or safety, the DOSH inspection can
issue an order prohibiting use. The order prohibiting use can apply to a machine, work
area, or entire plant. The area or equipment where an imminent hazard exists is marked
by a yellow tne. which may be removed only by a DOSH representative and after appro-
priate safeguards have been instituted. The ability to issue an order prohibiting use and
-23-
-------
2.6 Department of Industrial Relations. Division of
Labor Statistics and Research: Illness Reporting Systems
The Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) is, like DOSH, a Division in the
Department of Industrial Relations. Though it is separate from the CAL/OSHA program,
DLSR keeps various statistics relevant to occupational health. Whereas DOSH maintains
records relevant to its compliance inspections of worksites, DLSR maintains various statis-
tics related to cases of occupational illness. Though these statistics are all beset by certain
limitations in terms of their ability to characterize occupational illness patterns in
California, they provide a good deal of valuable information, and represent the best avail-
able sources of data in the nation for estimating cases of work-related disease in various
industries. DLSR also maintains an industrial relations research library.
There are three primary sources of DLSR data on occupational illness, the OSHA 200-S
form completed by employers as part of the annual federal Bureau of Labor Statistics
Annual Survey, The "Employer's Report of Occupational Injury or Illness", and the "Doc-
tor's First Report of Occupational Injury or Illness". These three sources each focus on
different aspects of occupational illness and injury, and differ with respect to diseases
included and industries covered. The sources, and the data bases and reports developed
from them, are as follows:
2.6.1 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey.
Under Section 8(c)(2) of the OSH Act, employers subject to OSHA regulation are
required to maintain records of work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths. Every year,
the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts a national survey, using questionnaires (the
OSHA 200 form) mailed to a scientifically selected sample of firms, to estimate total
occupational injuries and illnesses and incidence rates for all segments of industry subject
to OSHA (or state OSHA program) regulation.
The same form is also obtained by DLSR, from the same California respondents in the
national survey, to analyze California data specifically.
In California, approximately 32,000 employers are surveyed, with about 95% providing
usable responses. All injuries and illnesses requiring more than first aid are considered
reportable. The California data are published by DLSR about two years after the year for
which they are collected. The published report, titled "Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
Survey of California" presents illness rates by industry, type of case (i.e. whether or not it
involved lost work-days), number of lost work-days, number of illnesses by industry and
type of case, and percent distribution of occupational illnesses by category of illness
(without industry data). There are seven disease groups tabulated from the survey, includ-
ing skin disorders, dust diseases of the lung, respiratory conditions due to toxic agents.
systemic poisoning, disorders due to physical agents, diseases of repeated trauma (e.g.
hearing loss, Reynaud's Syndrome and synovitis), and other (including infectious diseases.
malignant and benign tumors). The California report does not include data on fatalities.
There are four basic limitations to the use of the survey data as presented in the
DLSR Report
a) Illness categories are very broad and often yield little insight into the nature of
the disability. (For example, malignancies and infectious disease both appear
under the category of "other"). Also, the seven general categories are not compan-
-25-
-------
c) Data are coded by county, allowing for development of local statistics.
d) The illness classification and coding system for this database is quite detailed,
unlike that used for the BLS survey, containing dozens of disease categories.
e) The classification of illnesses and injuries from the Employer's Report forms is
done by DLSR, based on descriptive data supplied by the employer on the form,
and not by the employer, as is the case in the BLS survey data. Thus, the
Employer's Report database is unaffected by misclassification on the part of
employers, or by decisions in a given industry as to how to classify certain types
of symptoms or impairment.
f) The linkage of the Employer's Reports to the Worker's Compensation System, even
though the reports are not used in claims litigation, has been associated with
stable and reliable employer reporting. Hence, the data from the reports can be
combined with employment data to produce rates of illness in an industry, allow-
ing reasonable comparisons among industries. DLSR does not presently calculate
such rates itself, however.
Notwithstanding the above positive features, the "Employer's Report" database is also
beset by important limitations with regard to occupational illness:
a) Underreporting. As with the other DLSR illness reporting systems, difficulties in
identifying occupational illness hinder reporting. Of all collected reports, those
relating to illness (as opposed to injury), comprise only 5%. The low volume of
illness-based reports undermines to some extent the detailed classification of illness
in the database. In fact, most of the tables in DLSR's annual report based on
this database ("Work Injuries and Illnesses") lump all occupational illness together
in one category, or aggregate all illness together with injury totals when analyzing
statistics by industry or occupation.
b) Bias toward acute illness. Again, like the other databases, acute disability tends to
dominate in Employer's Reports, while the degree to which chronic illness is
underreported is not known. In addition, employers tend not to file a report for
illness which cannot be traced to a particular incident.
c) Incomplete Reporting. Though the Employer's Report requests much detailed info:
mation, the information often is not or cannot be supplied. For example, for 2 ?
of occupational illness, the "source" (e.g. toxic substance) is "not stated"
d) Coverage. The database misses contested disease cases for which no Employers
Report was filed, and cases which did not result in a full day of work loss. The
latter point is particularly important insofar as transient symptoms produced by
toxic exposures may not result in the generation of a report.
Despite these limitations, the detailed level of information coded from the reports, and
the suitability of this information for establishing rates, makes this database reasonably
useful for evaluating illness characteristics in an industry, for developing local data, and
for comparing industries.
-27-
-------
Thus, the Doctor's First Report database represents a highly refined source of informa
tion which awaits more complete and widespread reporting to become a truly useful tool
for analysis of occupational disease in the state. Nevertheless, the database provides a
good indication of the illnesses and occupational hazards which prompt workers in a given
industry to seek medical treatment, and the amount of work time lost or hospitalization
resulting from illness.
Reports available from DLSR based on the above data bases are described in Appen-
dix 10.
2.7 California Department of Food and Agriculture
•
Under a 1976 interagency agreement with the Department of Industrial Relations, the
California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) has primary regulatory responsibilit>
for all occupational health hazards associated with pesticide use, including pesticide
application, handling, mixing and loading, and residue (e.g. farmworker) exposures. DIR
still retains jurisdiction over occupational hazards associated with pesticide manufacture.
storage, and distribution (wholesale and retail sales). This division of labor between
agencies is not absolute and situations of overlapping jurisdiction remain. For example,
during certain fumigation operations, the application of the fumigant is under DFA juris-
diction, while the plant workers potentially exposed to fumigant residue are still techni-
cally protected by CAL/OSHA. In addition, considerable responsibility for agricultural
hazards lies with the local County Agricultural Commissioner, and most investigations of
reported pesticide exposures are in fact conducted by the County Agriculture Commis-
sioner's Offices. Thus, in regard to pesticide illness investigations and some types of data
collection, DFA cooperates closely with the County Agricultural Commissioners.
DFA regulates and monitors pesticide use through its Division of Pest Management.
Environmental Protection, and Worker Safety. Among the functions performed by the Divi-
sion are the following:
2.7.1 Pesticide Use and Illness Surveillance
DFA maintains three separate data bases on pesticide use and exposure including
a) pesticide use reports,
b) pesticide registration, and
c) pesticide illness and investigation reports.
These systems are described in detail in Appendix 10.
2.7.2 Health Effects Information.
DFA's Worker Health and Safety Unit (in the Division of Pest Management) responds
to inquiries on health effects and illness associated with specific pesticides.
-29-
-------
registry and cluster identification and investigation program. The Program covers six Bay
Area counties, including Santa Clara. (Further details on the CBDMP are given in Appen-
dix 10.)
2.8.2 The Resource for Cancer Epidemiology.
This service collects and evaluates information on occurrences of cancer in the San
Francisco Bay Area counties, and operates the California Tumor Registry. The California
Tumor Registry collects and evaluates information on occurrences of cancer in San Fran-
cisco Bay Area counties, not including Santa Clara County, by abstracting data from medi-
cal records and death certificates.
2.8.3 The Radiologic Health Branch.
The Radiologic Health Branch keeps general information on radiologic health effects
and handling of materials, makes referrals to consulting physicians and offers hands-on
help in emergency incidents.
2.8.4. The Toxic Substances Control Division.
The Division provides technical advice and information to industry and the public on
hazardous waste control, and maintains the Hazardous Waste Information System. This sys-
tem is developed from Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifests, which must be filed by any
facility transporting hazardous waste or storing it over 90 days.
The Division also issues permits for, and monitors the treatments, long-term storage, and
disposal of, hazardous waste.
2.8.5 The Petris Bill (SB 495)
A new bill has recently been passed in the State legislature that establishes a program
supporting CAL-OSHA and local occupational health and safety agencies to be administered
by the state Department of Health Services. Senate Bill no. 495, known as the Petris Bill.
affirms that the "surveillance of occupational disease represents an important avenue for
anticipating risks to public health" and mandates the implementation within the state
department of "a continuing research and development capability and a repository of
hazardous substances capability which will reinforce and strengthen the administration of
the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973... including the capability to
recommend occupational health standards to the California Occupational Safety and Health
Standards Board." More specifically, the functions of the program established by the Petris
bill include, but are not limited to, the following:
a) Investigations into the causes of morbidity and mortality from work-induced dis-
eases.
b) Development of recommendations for improved control of work-induced diseases.
c) Maintenance of a thorough knowledge of the effects of industrial chemicals and
work practices on the health of California workers.
-31-
-------
Another source of information is the California Worker's Compensation Institute, which
is an association of private worker's compensation insurance carriers. The Institute collects
data from its members to study problems in the Worker's Compensation system. The limi-
tations of these data are the absence of a routine review of member carrier data and the
lack of key data elements.
2.10 Local Aeencies. Organizations and Regulations.
2.10.1. Santa Clara County Health Department
The regulation of occupational exposures at the local level in Santa Clara is presently
severely limited. The county Section of Occupational Health (formerly referred to as
Division of Occupational Health), once staffed by two chemists, three industrial hygiemsts.
an M.D., a nursing consultant, and a director in the early seventies, is currently staffed by
a single chemist. The Section has been allocated one industrial hygienist position, which is
vacant. Medical records and reports compiled in the 20 years of the Section's existence are
in hard copy files only: nothing has been computerized. Bud King, former director of the
Division of Occupational Health, reported that in the past the Division carried out a
variety of investigations, many of which were the result of burns, with "some gas expo-
sures, mostly phosphine and arsine". The Division also supervised asbestos sampling.
Some activities relevant to occupational health are currently performed by the office of
Hazardous Materials in the Department's Environmental Health Services Division. This
unit performs air monitoring for other county agencies on request. The Division does not
at present respond to monitoring requests from the public, however. The office of Hazar-
dous Materials also administers the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance for the county
(see below).
2.10.2 The Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's
Office.
The Commissioner's Office investigates occupational exposures to pesticides in Santa
Clara County. The Santa Clara Agricultural Commissioner is appointed by the County
Board of Supervisors, but receives 60% funding through a contractual arrangement with the
State Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA; see also the Section on DFA). The Com-
missioner receives pesticide use reports from local companies and agencies, and pesticide
illness reports from the County Health Officer (who receives them from physicians). The
Commissioner investigates all reported cases of pesticide-related illness resulting from use,
handling, mixing, loading or residues of pesticides; illnesses resulting from manufacturing
of pesticides are investigated by the DOSH San Jose office. Though the Commissioner's
office forwards use reports and reports of pesticide illness to the Department of Food and
Agriculture (DFA) for inclusion in Statewide Data-systems (see DFA section), these reports
are also available from the Commissioner.
2.10.3 The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances
Santa Clara County in 1983 passed a Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance requiring
any party storing hazardous materials to obtain and keep a current hazardous materials
-33-
-------
areas. The office has received about 600 files, starting in spring 1984, which eventually
will be accessible by company name, company address, type of business (not SIC), type of
hazardous material and type of storage. SIC's are not required either on the town or
county permit applications or HMMP's.
Use of Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances data to identify hazardous workplaces
is limited at present, due to incomplete reporting and computerization. Failure to include
SIC information in the HMIS, decentralized record-keeping, and limited computer capabilir.
of some municipalities all hamper use of these data for industry-wide surveillance, and
make them more suitable for identifying hazards used in individual firms. An example of
the type of data available from municipalities is shown in Appendix 12, using material
obtained from the City of Santa Clara.
The County currently has plans to compile a centralized inventory of hazardous mate-
rial users in the county, derived from municipal data from Hazardous Materials Storage
Ordinances, and from data to be collected in compliance with AB 2185 (the Waters Bill).
(This bill requires the County to develop an inventory of facilities using hazardous materi-
als to create area emergency response plans.) This central inventory would be maintained
by the County Health Department's Office of Hazardous Materials. The specific form and
content of this database have not yet been determined. The inventory will not be com-
pleted before 1987, and a precise timetable for completion has not been established.
2.10.4. SCCOSH.
SCCOSH is a local citizen organization concerned with occupational health. SCCOSH
provides information on health effects of toxic substances, including health and safety
information on the electronics industry. It conducts workshops on specific occupations
hazards, and provides movies and slide shows on occupational safety and health. The Cen-
ter also furnishes medical and legal referrals.
2.10.5. Valley Health Center.
The Valley Health Center, part of the County hospital in San Jose (the Valley Medical
Center) currently operates an occupational medicine clinic. The clinic is staffed by one
occupational health physician, Dr. Linda Morse, and one occupational health nurse.
-35-
-------
Contaminants (Sec. 5155); and Special Hazardous Substances and Processes (Sees. 5194-5220)
Some of these standards, such as those for lead (Sec. 5216), EDB (Sec. 5219), ethylene oxide
(Sec. 5220), asbestos (Sec. 5208), and inorganic arsenic (Sec. 5214), are "comprehensive", in
that they contain detailed requirements related to a wide range of hazard monitoring and
control activities. They represent a complex, integrated approach to hazard control. Such
standards generally include provisions for warning labels, exposure monitoring in the work
area, personal hygiene, "housekeeping" requirements, record-keeping, work practice and
engineering controls to reduce exposure (e.g. handling methods, ventilation), medical
surveillance to monitor exposure and disease in workers, protective equipment specifica-
tions, employee education and training, and a maximum permissible exposure level (PEL).
Issues of the work practices and engineering controls to limit exposure are carefully
reviewed in these -standards.
Most regulated hazardous substances, however, are controlled only by the Airborne
Contaminants Standard (Sec. 5155) which simply establishes maximum permissible exposure
levels (PEL) and basic monitoring requirements.
The PEL'S contained in the Airborne Contaminants Standard are adapted from the
Threshold Limit Values (TLV's) recommended by the American Conference of Governmen-
tal Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), and are periodically updated to reflect changes in the
ACGIH recommendations. However, ACGIH TLV's are not designed to be wholly protec-
tive of all workers, and ACGIH itself calls attention to the fact that a small percentage of
workers may not be adequately protected by the recommended limits. Accordingly, the
PEL'S in the Airborne Contaminants Standard may also be inadequate for some workers.
The California Airborne Contaminants Standard covers 570 contaminants, or 225 more than
the comparable federal standard.
Other standards (specifically Sees. 5225-5230, related to labelling; Sec. 5194, the state's
"right-to-know" standard; and Sec. 3204, allowing worker access to exposure and medical
records) also add labelling and education requirements for many of these substances.
3.2.2 Terminology
Interpretation of health standards requires an understanding of certain specialized
terms. "Permissible Exposure Level" (PEL) defines the maximum legally allowable concen-
trations of a toxic substance to which nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed, day
after day, without harmful effect. PEL'S are typically expressed as a time weighted aver-
age (TWA) for an eight-hour period. A TWA is the actual concentration of a substance to
which a worker is exposed over a given period of time. For example, the PEL for inor-
ganic arsenic (GISO 5214) is an eight-hour TWA of 0.01 milligrams per cubic meter of air
PEL's may be accompanied by a ceiling limit, which is never to be exceeded. These latter
recommendations are typically made to prevent acute illness, such as irritation and acute
poisoning.
Some comprehensive standards also refer to an "action level", which is the minimum
concentration of exposure at which control provisions described in the standard (in addi-
tion to monitoring) must be implemented. Some substances in the airborne contaminants
standard are also governed by an "excursion limit", the maximum concentration to which
an employee may be exposed -regardless of duration provided the 8 hour TWA concentra-
tion doesn't exceed the PEL. Excursion limits are accompanied by an "excursion duration".
the maximum time period allowed for an exposure above the excursion limit but not
exceeding the ceiling limit.
-37-
-------
expressly encourage the Division of Occupational Safety and Health to develop, and the
Standards Board to adopt, health standards even when no comparable federal standard
exists, whenever available evidence dictates that such action is necessary to protect worker
health. This encouragement is consistent with the OSH Act, which permits state standards
to exceed those of federal OSHA if they are necessary due to local conditions, and do not
unduly disrupt interstate commerce.
There are several key differences between California Occupational Health Standards
and those of federal OSHA. First, the California Airborne Contaminants Standard (GISO
5155) covers 570 substances, while the corresponding federal standard covers only 391
substances. Moreover, California has reviewed these PEL'S in light of changes in ACGIH
recommendations, and in many cases revised the PEL's to reflect these changes. Federal
OSHA has made no corresponding revisions. Certain standards requiring general safety
provisions for particular classes of substances (e.g., corrosives) also have no federal
counterpart. Section 24230 of the Health and Safety Code requires that users of substances
identified by the state as carcinogens, presently comprising 22 substances, must register
with the state. No such federal registration requirement exists. California has also
adopted two comprehensive standards -- for MOCA and for EDB --which have no federal
counterpart.
3.2.5 Factors in Developing a Standard
Standards must be set such that to the extent "feasible", no employee suffers material
impairment of health, even if regularly exposed to a substance for his or her working life
This mandate imposes several burdens on the Standards Board. It must show that a sub-
stance or process as it is actually encountered in the workplace can cause "material impair-
ment", and that the proposed exposure limits and controls are sufficient to prevent material
impairment and that methods for complying with the standard are feasible, i.e., are techno-
logically possible and within the means of at least some firms in an industry to adopt. The
types of information needed to satisfy these requirements may differ considerably depend-
ing on the nature of the hazard at issue; accordingly, there are no specific criteria for
evidence for material hazard or "safe" exposure levels. However, the U.S. Supreme Court
has upheld the federal OSHA cotton dust standard in which a PEL was established to pre-
vent the early acute, reversible effects of cotton dust exposure, and further stated that this
approach was entirely appropriate to the definitions of "material impairment". That is, the
regulating agency need not only protect against the levels that result in chronic, irrever-
sible disease. The court recognized that the disease associated with cotton dust exposure
was a continuous process and that prevention of early reversible effects would result in
elimination of chronic disease.
Unfortunately, neither CAL/OSHA's Airborne Contaminants' PEL'S, nor the PEL's in
the individual comprehensive standards (e.g. lead) afford total protection to all workers.
The Airborne Contaminants' PEL's are based on ACGIH TLV's, which, as noted, are not
set to protect all workers. Moreover, some of the substances now regulated under the
Airborne Contaminants Standard (e.g., benzene), or under individual comprehensive stan-
dards (e.g. asbestos, GISO 5208) are suspect or known carcinogens, and prevailing scientific
opinion holds that any level of exposure to carcinogens entails some risk. Reduction of
carcinogen exposures to zero, however, is generally not possible within the "feasibility"
constraint on federal and state standard setting.
Feasibility constraints have often limited the level of protection of non-carcinogens as
well. For example, OSHA anticipated that even with compliance, the Cotton Dust Standard
would still allow a 14% prevalence of lung disease byssinosis among cotton and textile
-39-
-------
hazardous substance (i.e., concentrations above the "action level").
Monitoring is also needed if a new process or operation involving hazardous sub-
stances is implemented or changes are made in the old ones, to determine if toxic levels of
exposure are occurring. Monitoring can also be used to identify the source of a contami-
nant, and to test the effectiveness of engineering controls such as proper ventilation or an
enclosure system.
Because inhalation is the major route of entry of a contaminant in the work environ-
ment, air sampling is the most important type of workplace environmental monitoring.
Choice of sampling methods depends on a number of variables, e.g., what are the objectives
of the sampling: to identify potential hazards and define sources of contamination; to
assess employee exposure to a known contaminant; to assess compliance with existing stan-
dards; to conduct epidemiologic investigations; to do continuous monitoring in order to
trigger an alarm should a certain level be exceeded. Another variable is consideration of
the substance being sampled, and its physical properties, such as whether it is a gas or
paniculate. Due to different physical and chemical properties of hazards, different air
sampling techniques must be used. Specific techniques may be used for specific chemicals.
The work space, the industrial processes, plus worker behavior should also be considered in
choosing air sampling methods.
There are two basic types of air sampling, area and personal, each suited to different
objectives and circumstances. Area sampling, as implied by the name, is the collection of
air in a given area of the workplace. Area sampling can be collected over a short period
of time ("grab sampling") to detect the presence of a contaminant or measure a peak
hazard concentration, or over a longer period of time to measure average hazard concentra-
tions, or to detect whether air concentrations ever exceed certain levels.
Area sampling can be performed close to workers at a particular work station, or
close to the source or suspected source of exposure (e.g., a particular machine) in order to
characterize exposures in the work station or at the source. If, on the other hand, the
object of sampling is to locate a source of contamination, or to check the effectiveness of
control measures (e.g. ventilation system), area sampling can be performed on general room
air through a network of various sampling points.
A key advantage of area sampling is that it can be conducted from fixed points
using stationary equipment. Because the equipment is thus not constrained by consider-
ations of size or weight, large but very accurate instruments can be used to monitor key
work areas or equipment continuously. Continuous monitoring is especially vital where
substances in use have acute toxic effects, and are therefore not to exceed specified ceiling
limits. The disadvantage of area sampling is that, precisely because it is conducted from
fixed points, it does not measure the true exposures received by workers, who may move
among different work areas.
Personal Sampling for air contaminants, in contrast, is designed to measure the actual
exposures received by workers in any or all of their work stations, or during their entire
shift. Such sampling typically uses a device worn by the worker, which measures the
hazard concentrations in the worker's breathing zone (i.e., close to the worker's face). Air
samples collected in this manner are also called operator's breathing zone (obz).
Because personal sampling more accurately measures workers' true exposures, it is
required by some CAL/OSHA comprehensive standards in order to calculate 8 hr. TW.Vs
(time weighted average), and is considered by CAL/OSHA to be the only truly reliable
method for obtaining exposure measurements that can be compared with hazard PEL's.
-41-
-------
peak exposures to dangerous compounds, such as arsine, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen
cyanide. Also, the intrusive nature of some methods, such as blood sampling, make them
unpopular with employees.
In addition, there are research-related limitations. One is the need for more toxico-
logical information regarding the absorption, metabolism (including mechanism of action),
distribution and excretion of the agent being monitored. Also, one needs to show at what
level of a biological parameter adverse health effects occur. Establishing a "normal" value
entails far reaching cross-sectional surveys. Finally, it is very important to have reliable
tests for biological monitoring, i.e., tests with good predictive value, sensitivity and
specificity, and reproducibility. All these areas need further research.
3.3.2.3 Most Common Specimens
In selecting a biological media to analyze, several considerations must be taken into
account:
a) The convenience of obtaining a specimen or its routine availability;
b) The route of exposure/intake;
c) The metabolic pathway of the exposure substance in the body;
d) The time of sampling;
e) The availability of published, reference limits; and
f) The characteristics of the analytic method to be employed. The three most com-
monly evaluated media are urine, blood and expired air.
Urine analysis is probably the most frequently used method in biological monitoring.
Samples are easy to collect and the procedure is noninvasive. Furthermore, nearly all
exposure chemicals or their metabolites are present in urine in amounts often proportional
to the absorbed dose. Urine analysis may be used to monitor for metabolites of solvents
such as benzene, styrene, xylene, toluene, TCE, etc., and has also been used for direct
measurements of such inorganic substances as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead.
Expired air, like urine, is an easily obtained specimen but its use is limited to
substances with a sufficiently high volatility to be exhaled in measurable amounts. Such
substances include chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents like methylene chloride, carbon tetrach-
loride and trichloroethylene, and unsubstituted aromatic hydrocarbon solvents like benzene,
toluene and xylene. The marked influence of atmospheric concentrations on breath concen-
trations and the rapid excretion of volatile substances limit the collection of samples to the
time just after exposure. However, samples taken shortly after exposure may represent the
latest exposure level and not an average. Thus appropriate timing and good analytical
techniques are particularly difficult problems in this biological monitoring technique.
While blood concentrations of a substance may seem to represent the best correlation
between the atmospheric concentrations, amount absorbed, amount retained and in some
cases the severity of the effect, blood analysis is more problematic than urine or breath
analysis due. to the fact that it is an invasive technique. Worker participation and
frequent acquisition of samples would subsequently be limited. Monitoring of blood has
been used to measure carbon monoxide exposure, which causes the formation of carboxyhe-
-43-
-------
4. OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY
4.1 Introduction
This section identifies industries in Santa Clara County with the
greatest assessed potential for occupational health problems derived from chemical exposure
At the outset, it is important to state that given the available data, with the exception of
the data presented in the industry profile section, we were not able to document actual
occupational health problems in specific industries. We have therefore used federal data
bases available to us to identify potential problems. These include recently developed
industry rankings based on Federal OSHA inspection results and NIOSH NOHS data; the
use of these data bases has been described in detail elsewhere (1). For the purpose of this
study, industry was ranked according to the real or potential exposure to hazardous agents
rather than on the basis of existing occupational illness or disease. To rank industries by
their potential or real exposures to hazardous substances, three types of information were
sought:
a) What is the extent of exposure to hazardous substances in the industry, including
the number of substances and levels of exposure?
b) What is the nature of the health effects associated with each chemical?
c) How many workers are exposed?
The following information was gathered and used to develop the industry rankings.
a) Industry size. Industry size is characterized by the number of persons employed in
a given 4-digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC). The distribution of
employees within a SIC was also considered important. For example, a SIC with
total employment of 1,000 may include 10 facilities of 100 persons each or 1
facility employing a 1,000 persons.
b) A history of documented high exposure to multiple agents which have significant
toxicitv. There are four sources of information on actual worker exposure which
have potential use in ranking industry. These include:
• Federal OSHA compliance information. This information derives from federal
OSHA compliance inspections in states where there are no state OSHA
programs. The information is contained in the OSHA Management Information
System (MIS).
• CAL/OSHA compliance information. Data derived from actual inspections in
Santa Clara County and/or California may have utility in ranking of
industries. Unfortunately, CAL/OSHA compliance data are not computerized.
Each case file must be reviewed individually and exposure painstakingly
extracted by hand if CAL/OSHA information is to be used in assessing the
occupational health problems in Santa Clara County.
-45-
-------
The following criteria were used:
a) Psychological and physical factors were not considered.
b) Rankings are for industry only, and not occupation. (Although the logical unit for
both surveillance and enforcement is the company or the industry, the lack of
data bases which record occupation necessitates this approach as well.)
c) The unit of analysis is the four digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code
which identifies industries producing similar products. Within one SIC, however,
there are industries which may have different chemical usage and exposure
experience.
4.2.1 Problems in Data Collection
Where problems were encountered in developing data on chemical exposure and indus-
try demographics , they were due in most part to one of two general situations - either
the desired data were not available, or in some way their applicability was limited. There
were three reasons for data not being available. These include: 1) the desired information
had not been gathered at all, 2) it had been gathered without the advantage of computer-
ization and/or tabulation, or 3) it was gathered under the auspices of an agency which
held the data confidential. Examples of non-computerization were abundant, particularly in
local agencies working on hazardous waste control and 'Right-to-Know'. For example, the
City of Santa Clara, which has the most thorough computerization of hazardous materials
management information to date, does not keep records by SIC. Confidentiality was a
problem in obtaining an industry-occupation matrix and employment projections. In some
of these situations, it would seem that greater inter-agency cooperation might allow these
data to be used for research purposes while still protecting legitimate requirements for
confidentiality.
The Employment Development Department (EDD) of the State of California maintains
an industry-occupation matrix. Unfortunately, for purposes of this research, it is highly
confidential (that is, restricted to EDD use only). A data tape was obtained which listed
Occupational Employment Survey (OES) estimates of employment patterns by SIC. Lack of
numeric coding of occupational titles precluded using this tape to construct an industry-
occupation matrix for this report. EDD also publishes some OES data, but unfortunately
the published data were not sufficiently detailed for use in a project of this nature, e.g.
most of the industry data are at the 2-digit SIC level. EDD also maintains an industry-
occupation matrix based on a 20% sample of the 1970 Census. It is less current, less
accurate and less detailed than the OES matrix, and it is also confidential. There is an
appeals process through which health research projects might obtain an actual matrix from
EDD, though this process is a protracted one for which the time frame of this project did
not allow. Future research in this area could benefit greatly from pursuing an EDD
matrix.
4.2.2 Data Sources
Only two data sources which provided information on chemical use were available, anJ
only one of these gives actual exposure information. NIOSH's National Occupational
Hazard Survey (NOHS) conducted from 1972-1974, identifies potential chemical exposures
in industries (2, 3). NIOSH has recently completed a new survey, the National Occupa-
-47-
-------
Hazard Ranking: The HRINs for each substance found in an industry are weighted
by the exposure factor and then summed to yield a final value, the Industry Risk Index
(IRI). The IRI system is flexible in allowing the user to choose several options: 1) what
health effect endpoints will be considered 2) what weight each endpoint will be assigned;
3) whether to analyze SIC codes by 2, 3 or 4 digits; and 4) whether to weight ratings by
the 1973 census figures (5).
In our modification of the IRI, we chose the 4-digit SIC level of analysis without
census data weightings. We selected three health effects endpoints: "acute toxicity" as a
measure of acute effects, "carcinogenicity/neoplasticity" as a measure of DNA effects, and
"other toxic effects" as a measure of chronic effects. A normalized sum of those three
effects was calculated whereby all three outcome measures have the same range and the
same weight.
4.2.3.2 OSHA Weighted Index Ranking (OWI).
To develop inspection priorities, federal OSHA used NOHS to design a 'Weighted
Index' (OWI) by SIC code.(7) This system is currently not in use by federal or State
OSHA programs. There are significant differences between this index and the IRI: only
chemicals regulated by OSHA are included and there is no correction for whether controls
are in place, because OSHA must also inspect controlled exposures. The OSHA Weighted
Index uses a different approach to weight part-time versus full-time exposures and to
assess the toxic potency of a substance.
Exposure Factor: The exposure index for each SIC is based on NOHS data. Whereas
NIOSH gives full-time exposure twice the weight of part-time, OSHA gives it five times
the weight.
Hazard Ranking: OSHA convened a panel of scientists to assign a simple hazard
weight to each substance the agency regulates. The basic criterion was the judged
seriousness of the exposure-related health effects. Factors in the judgement included
strength of the evidence on whether the substance causes cancer or irreversible health
effects, whether the evidence is based on human or animal studies and the number of
organ systems affected. The scale developed by OSHA was a simple 1, 3, 7, 10 rating, with
10 being the most serious. The resultant hazard weight for each chemical was then
multiplied by the exposure factor and the results summed for all regulated substances
found by NOHS in the SIC code.
The original OWI was modified to include only SIC codes where the worksite included
in the NOHS survey had at least 100 workers; SICs with fewer workers were accepted onl\
if NOHS had sampled two or more sites within the SIC.
4.2.3.3 Industry Rankings Based on Actual Exposure Information:
The Inspection-Based Industry Ranking (IBERs).
We developed a ranking system using the federal OSHA MIS compliance data. This
system includes information on actual levels of exposure in contrast to the NOHS survey
of potential industrial exposures. The data used covered almost four years of federal
OSHA inspection data (1979-1982) derived from approximately 15,000 inspections and 60.00t
test samples from 475 SICs in states without state OSHA enforcement programs. California
is Q2i included in this database. SICs with fewer than three inspections were eliminated
-49-
-------
TABLE 4-1
Inspection ft Test Sanples In OSHA Inspection Data: SIC 2812 Alkalies
and Chlorine
Inspection
No.
1
2
3
4
5
Substances Sampled
(Substance-Inspection Unit)
aniline
nitrobenzene
chlorine
chlorine
hydrogen chloride
hydrogen sulflde
mercury
sulfur dioxide
sulfurlc add
mercury
dimethyl hydrazlne
All Inspections
I of Test
Sanples
4
4
12
2
1
1
29
4
1
10
1
69
Mean*
Severity
Level
0.02
o.zn
1.10
0.00
n.oo
0.17
0.58
0.08
0.02
0.16
0.20
0.23
OSHA Hazard
Weight for
Substance
7
1
7
7
7
7
in
i
7
in
b
•
Each row 1s one substance-Inspection unit, sumarlzlng the test sanples taken
for each substance during each Inspection.
a Mean severity level 1s the average of the measured exposure levels divided
by the Permissible Exposure Limit.
No hazard weight given this substance.
-51-
-------
TABLE 4-2
Comparison of NIOSH and OSHA Industry Indexes Using NOHS for Exposure Data
Industry Risk Index (IRI)
OSHA Weighted Index (OWI)
Comments
Substances
Included
Hazard Rating:
Criteria:
Range:
en
ui
Exposure Index
for Substances:
Duration
of exposure:
Level of
exposure:
Number of
exposures:
I7?l Chemicals common
to NOHS and RTECS. No
mixtures or processes.
Rated by potency of chemical
(size of dose) In producing
certain health effects with
the emphasis on ONA effects.
0.001 - 1.000 In Increments
of 0.001; thus 1000 steps.
Part-time (30 mln./wk to
4 hrs/day) Is weighted
half of full-tine (4 or more
hrs/day) exposure.
Controlled exposures are
weighted one tenth that
of uncontrolled exposures.
No Information on actual
levels.
Proportion of employees
surveyed In the plant who
are exposed full or
part-tine.
954 substances common
to NOHS and OSHA regulated
substances. Represents About
450 regulated substances
In various compounds.
Rated by severity of effect.
Irreversible effects In
more than one organ system
In humans or more than one
animal species rate highest.
1 to 10 1n four steps 1.3.7,10.
Part-time Is weighted one
fifth of full-time exposures.
No Information on actual
levels of exposure. No
consideration of controls.
Same as IRI with different
weighting of full and part
time.
All OUt chemicals are
In NOHS-RTECS except coke
oven funes or similar
complex emissions.
Full time exposures are
weighted more heavily 1n the
OSHA Weighted Index; however
the majority of all
exposures are part-time.
The weighting of controls
by the IRI may reduce the
effect of controlled heavy
Industry exposures and
Increase the effect of
uncontrolled exposures In
services and trades.
-------
TABLE 4-4
Cianples of SICs with High Ranks In Inspection • Rased Ciposvre Ratings (IBERs).
1/1
i
SIC
Raffle
Mean
Severity*
Top
3321
3362
3691
3341
5093
3731
3523
2816
3325
3269
Top
3792
3433
1622
3341
3743
3253
3569
2A2I
3731
2879
Ten StCs on MedSublns
fir ay Iron Fndry
Brass, Bronie Fndry
Storage Batteries
2* Nonferrous Met.
Scrap A Waste,
Wholesale
Shipbuilding
Farm Machinery
Inorganic Pigments
Steel Foundries
Pottery Products NEC
Ten SICs on NnSubs
. Travel Trailers
Heating Equip.
Bridge, Tunnels
2* Nonferrous Net.
Railroad Equip.
Ceramic Tiles
Industrial Machinery
Plastics 1 Resins
Shipbuilding
Agricultural Chen.
.70
1.10
2.93
3.01
1.S3
2.25
1.63
2.44
0.47
1.39
26.49
6.44
15.47
3.01
2.54
12.09
3.75
1.26
2.?5
2.37
Median I Subst.
Severity
.?5
.45
.69
.21
.79
0.17
0.20
0.83
0.19
1.02
.05
.OR
.55
.21
.13
0.69
0.03
0.04
0.17
0.08
f Subst.-
I Subst.
Inspections with Exp^** HedSuhs
3fl
25
12
34
14
25
20
13
26
7
9
22
9
34
35
5
16
46
25
22
391
176
107
229
46
201
157
34
146
26
14
56
19
279
165
14
34
141
201
39
13
R
4
15
5
15
8
6
8
4
4
6
5
15
16
3
5
17
15
5
5
1
7
8
2
20
22
3
17
9
1R3
70
16
8
18
2«
179
59
70
75
Ranks of IRERs
MedSublns HnSubs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
R
9
10
TOO
56
24
4
13
30
169
44
6
7R
28
26
19
4
37
12
21
73
71
84
1
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
NnSublns
9
14
7
1
30
2
10
77
32
58
4
5
B
1
3
16
27
15
2
25
•Severity Is the exposure measured as a proportion of the Permissible Exposure Limit.
••Number of substances where the maximum exposure observed Is 501 or more of the Permissible Exposure Limit.
-------
TABLE 4-5
SANTA CLARA COUNTY INDUSIRIES RANKED BY EMPLOYMENT (>30O)
WITH IIA/ARD RANKINGS
SIC INDUSTRY
-J
I
3573 ELFCTRONIC COMPUTING
36/1 SEMICONDUCTORS
36/9 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS
3662 RADIO AND TV COMMUNIC.
82II ELEM. fc SECOND. SCHOOLS
3761 MISSILES, SPACE VEHICLES
5812 EAIING PLACES
8911 ENG. fc ARCH. SURVEYING
7391 HIS. fc DEV. LABS
8062 HOSPITALS
8?21 COLLEGES, UNIVfRSITItS
0169 IIORTIC. SPECIALTIES NEC
7399 BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC
3399 MACHINERY, NONELECTRIC
3823 INSTRUMENTS, MfAS. ELEC.
3199 NONDURABLE GOODS, NEC
5311 DEPT. STORES
3U63 ELECTRONIC PARIS. EQPT.
6331 RCAL ESTATE AGENTS
7372 COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
5111 GROCERY STORES
6023 NAT. BANKS, TRS MDRS.
3811 ENG. le LAB. INSTRUMENTS
739? MGMT.t PUBLIC REIATIONS
3661 TELEPHONE. 1ELEG. APPAR.
33H NEW ft USED CAR DEALERS
3631 RADIO AND TV RCG. SETS
1711 PLUMB. IIEAI, AIR CONDIT.
(4213 TRUCKING, NON-LOCAL
7011 HOTELS fc MOTELS
1321 HOUSING CONSTRUC, 1 EAM.
8931 ACCT, AUDIT, BOOKKEEPING
6'lll INSURANCE SERVICES
73/1 DATA PROCESSING SVC.
1/11 ELECTRICAL WORK
3991 BROOMS AND BRUSHES
36/2 CATHODE RAY IEIEVISION
31)61 CUMMIHCIAL MACHINES
3623 PROCESS CONTROL INSIR.
3H/9 MISC. PLASTIC PRODUCIS
8922 NONCOMMIR. fl). Rl SEARCH
7393 DEI I CM VI ft PRO I EC I. SVC
3999 MISCELEANIOIJS RIIAII
736? TEMPORARY HI I P SUPPIY
7Vl9 BUDDING MAINIfNANCI
3'l29 HARDWARE, NIC
3/2'l AIRCKATT ENGINES k PARTS
3/11 MO I OR VIHICI IS
2033 CANNI O I RUMS AND VfCS
8059 NURSING, PI RS. CARI NIC
nni M GAI si RVICI s
3999 MANIII AC HIRING INDUS I R
|M I IIIRHINIS. (,I NIK A I OH SMS
I BLR
RANK
386
313
277
199
3B'l
3/'I
'I'll
180
127
133
118
1)01
367
117
1419
288
ill 1
1'l3
230
31(8
133
333
366
210
207
9
2H7
2JO
3;>0
III)
•C.fl
OWI
RANK
293
120
159
321
157
581
135
29
Mil)
IRI
RANK
81
131
109
71
135 "
102 •
269
6'l8
592
317
706
628
585
675
260
135 •
139
39 •
195
16 •
510
588
'128
610
709
628
1 19 "
550
175
286
333
132
.
.
185
138
267
175
.
78
,
115
35
215
230
.
171
15
233
.
129
263
58
87
38
28
71
361
llfl
an
169
SC COUNTY
EMPLOYMENT
70506
52187
23819
23075
20151
2O010
198*75
11620
11603
11272
10036
10003
7111
6337
6068
5917
5717
5121
5361
5267
5010
1891
1680
1199
1387
1288
1213
1015
3865
3808
3802
3612
3608
3561
3171
3320
3017
2913
2923
2888
2853
2821
2815
2803
2615
2602
2602
?'.99
• i /•
-------
TABLE 4-5 (conf d)
SANTA CLARA COUNTY INOUSTRIfS RANKED BY EMPLOYMENT (>30O)
Ui
VŁ>
I
SIC
3H71
7395
2721
31)59
2879
59«|7
161 1
INDUSTRY
IDFR
RANK
6513
7231
8399
3296
208M
6512
8321
?05 1
2751
2099
H6i| 1
0181
8051
8021
MB99
7? 16
5039
51'l9
7539
3'l'H
6519
0/82
8069
0/81
3699
5/13
3'i/9
fill? 3
?M I
59'Hl
?lt I <)
5199
5161
5/1?
2651
/(,,")
5i|6?
;'(M5
PLATING AND POLISHING 98
PHOIOI INI SUING LADS 258
PFRIODICAIS, PUR ft PRIN. 'I'l'l
SPEC I At I NOUS IRY MACII. 155
AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS 2'l
GIFT, NOVELIY, SHOPS
HIGHWAY k S1RECI CONSIR. 37
IND. BLDGS. ft WAREHOUSES 119
OPERATORS OF APT. BLDGS.
BFAUTY SHOPS l| 1 3
SOCIAL SERVICES NEC
LOCAL TRUCK, W/ STORAGE
MINERAL WOOL 123
WINES. ORANDY
OPIR. OF NON-RES BLOCS. 058
INDIV. ft FAMILY SERVICES
IIKFAD, CAKE, ft RM . PHD. 39'l
COMMERCIAL PRINTING 235
FOOD PREPARATIONS, NEC 3'l5
CIVIC ft SOCIAL ASSOCS.
T LOR I CULT. It NURSERY
SKILIED NURS. CARE FACS.
OTFICES OF DENTISIS
COMMUNICAIION SfRVICE
DRY CLEANING PLANTS I|9
CONSTRUCTION MAIFRIAI 291
GROCERIES, REL PROS NEC 399
WAIER, SfWER, PIPF LINES 8?
AUIOMOTIVI REPAIR SHOPS 161
IAB. STRUCTURAL MFTAL ?8
IESSORS OF REAL PROP.
LAWN ft GAROtN SERVICES
SPIC. HOSPITAIS, X-PSY. 387
LANDSCAPE PING ft COUNS.
RlIKIGERATFD WAREHOUSE
MICTRICAI CQUIPMINT 376
TIOOR COVTRING SI ORES
Mi IAI. COAT ING 65
Ml). BANKS, miC. NTRS
CINfRAI WAREHOUSING 3IO
ROOK Plini. I SUING 'l?9
JlWf I RY SIORfS
INI) INORGANIC CIIFMS NIC 15
MISC GTN MlRCHAND S1ORTS
CIIIMICAIS ft AM III) I'RDS 295
RADIO AND III I VISION
CORRUG, SOI II) I Illl R IIOX 1? 1
IMCIKICAI RII'AIR SHOPS 26?
Rl I All HAM KIIS
I'lCKI I S. SAIICI S. SAI AD DR.
HOOK SIORIS
IJM I) Ml KCIIANDI SI SIORI S
I I OK ISIS
SIAII HANKS. IKS
OWI
RANK
76
135
388
107
UK 7
399
291
311
510
1)96
311
I4MO
6*1
530
636
359
100
1192
562
'188
5'l5
157
60
18
31 1
352
2H8
352
61 /
ll/'l
5
6/5
61 /
6 5'l
I 10
/16
656
I/'I
II,')
'I'I /
/'ill
191
6/5
IRI
RANK
123
118
121
356
388
326
72
266
2M8
305
393
76
31(6
2i|6
107
SC COUNTY
EMPLOYMENT
103M
1022
1017
101 7
1008
977
968
961
958
9'! 8
916
911
900
889
862
852
8?9
829
825
798
7/3
7/1
770
753
753
739
730
7?0
718
712
701
700
686
6/7
6 Ml
670
665
660
658
-------
TABLE 4-5 (cont'd)
SANTA CLARA COUNTY INDUSTRIES RANKED BY EMPLOYMENT (>300)
SIC INDUSTRY I HI R
RANK
5085 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 210
B?99 SCHOOLS, ED SVCS. NEC
5021 FURNITURE
1/93 CLASS AND GLAZING WORK
5331 VARIETY STORES
5003 SCRAP & WASTE MATERIAL 10
50>lt SPORTING k REC. GOODS
5H3 MUSIC STORES
5182 WINES. DISTILIED BEVS.
59'I9 SI WING, NEEDLEWORK
80/2 DINIAL IABORAIORIES 378
M/12 IRF.ICIIT FORWARDING
8351 CHILD DAY CARE CINTERS
l|?26 SPFCIAL WAREHOUSING Ul9
50/2 HARDWARE
?on6 BOIILED, CAN SOFT DRINKS 13?
26117 SANITARY PAPER PRODUCT
?(|3'l WOOD KIICHtN CAB I NE IS 106
8331 JOB TRNG fc VOC REHAB '158
07112 VE1ERINARY SPECIAL1Y
5'I99 MISC FOOD STORFS
16?2 BRIDGE, 1NL, {LEV IIWY 5
1/91 SIKUCTURAL SIEIL ERICr. 2/3
I/Ml MASONRY, OTIIR STONEWORK 12/
6331 HIU, MARINE, CAS. INS.
7332 BIUEPRINT., PHOTOCOPYING 2'l9
1/113 MRRA/ZO, II LI, MARBLE
3273 READY-MIXED CONCRf IE <458
6I'I3 SIA1E CREOI I UNIONS
?5'll WOOD PAR1IIIONS 316
5699 MISC APPAREL & ACCES.
0/?3 CHOP PRCP. SERVICIS
/6'll Rl IIPHOl SIFR. , FURN. RPR 32/
6361 I I III INSURANCE
5181 IUFR AND Al E
506't MICTRICAI APPI IANCFS
3??9 PRISSEI) AND BIOWN C.IASS ?9
365? PHONOGRAPH RlCOHDS 3M6
3'l69 Ml FAL SIAMPINGS, NEC 137
?8?1 PIASriCS MAIIRIALS 15
3561 PUMPS fc PUMPING IQPT. 1/8
35/2 rYPCWRIURS
86?1 PROF. MfMUIRSHIP ORGS..
NO OAI A I OR HI IS SIC
• RANKING IS IN III) IOP ?0% 01 All SICS
HUM INSPI Cl ION HASH) I XPOSUHI KAMNC.S
(IWI O'.IIA Wl If'.HI I I) INIII X
IK I I NOUS III I Al KISK INDIX
OWI
RANK
175
582
653
125
591
395
598
602
681
50
70«l
617
263
Ii8l
187
5?
366
662
157
125
201
719
UlU
201
186
692
83
596
502
531
703
681
31/
IRI
RANK
222
257
313
238
251
1 1 1
389
303
16
236
126
SC COUNTY
EMPLOYMENT
384
383
378
37&
375
372
370
370
36H
361
360
359
356
355
352
351
350
') 'l
39/
27
1?
3'l7
338
338
330
327
32'l
32M
3?'l
3?3
3?0
320
318
316
3 I 'I
311
310
309
308
3(l/
306
305
303
300
300
300
-------
3499, 7216, 3255, and 3479, employ more than 500 persons in the county.
In using these rankings there are a number of factors which must be considered.
a) The data from which the IBER rankings were developed are federal OSHA data
from states with no state plans. No computerized California data are available
for comparison purposes. That is, there are no means available for determining
whether the federal data is representative of California or Santa Clara industry.
A substantial number of CAL/OSHA standards are stricter than federal OSHA
standards 'and this may have an impact on exposure levels for those chemicals in
California plants. Whether differences in geographical location, age of the
industry, unionization patterns, type of inspections, employment size, company
stability and profitability are important variables which would affect both the
actual exposure levels and the relative ranking of industries remains to be
determined. Until the State of California computerizes its compliance data or
obtains environmental monitoring data from companies, these questions cannot be
resolved. For the purpose of this report, we must assume that the national
rankings have relevance to the local situation.
b) There are inaccuracies in the N1OSH industrial file. The primary discrepancies
include: identified companies actually being out of business or moved to another
location, incorrect number of employees, or that the SIC code designation does not
reflect the actual industrial process. Inaccurate SIC code designation can have
significant implications when attempting to set priorities, e.g., compliance
programming, and intervention strategies. For example, SICs 3341, secondary lead
smelting, and 3691, battery manufacture, rank number 1 and 3 on the IBER list.
and the NIOSH industrial file lists 4 establishments with 80 employees in SIC 334.
and 4 establishments with 180 employees in SIC 3691 in Santa Clara County A
telephone check of the 8 establishments identified in the NIOSH file indicated
that there were no facilities which actually conducted manufacturing in Santa
Clara County as designated by their SIC listing in Dun and Bradstreet. On the
other hand, the NIOSH industrial files are the only employment data base
available for developing industrial profiles and therefore must be used despite the
presence of some inaccuracies.
c) In some cases the SIC code designations are relatively broad and may not be
sufficiently descriptive of the industrial process. Examples are those 4-digit SIC
codes which end in the digit "9". The "9" designates miscellaneous four digit
industries covering establishments "not elsewhere classified". These residual
establishments do not usually constitute homogeneous primary activity groups. For
example SIC 3079, miscellaneous plastics products, includes over 110 different
products. Therefore, chemicals and exposures identified in a particular facility
may not be representative of others with the same SIC code. Fourteen of the top
75 SICs fall into the miscellaneous category.
While acknowledging the uncertainties described above, the 75 SICs represent those
industries with a history of high exposures to multiple substances. Local or state official?
therefore need to consider this list seriously when defining priorities and resource
allocation even though the actual number of employees may be small.
-64-
-------
Low IBER ranking, but high exposure to one specific chemical
Industries which ranked high in IBERS have two characteristics, namely high exposure^
to multiple substances. IBER rankings are weighted toward multiple exposures. There are
industries, however, which have documented high exposures but only to a single substance.
thereby constituting a highly significant exposure problem; since there is only a single
substance, however, the IBER ranking is low. Table 4-7 lists the chemicals for which high
individual exposures have been documented in the OSHA MIS but which fall outside of
the top 75 SICs listed above. Santa Clara County employment and number of establish-
ments are included in the Table. The criteria for inclusion in the table are a minimum of
3 inspections, a mean severity level greater than 1.0 (exposure equal to or greater than the
PEL), and an IBER ranking higher than 75 (i.e., not on the 1-75 ranking list). For
asbestos, a mean severity level of 0.25 was used since it is generally recognized that the
current OSHA standard for asbestos is inadequate (9). More SICs would
have been included if a lower severity level, e.g., 0.5, were selected.
Five substances, lead, asbestos, chromium, coal tar pitch volatiles, and silica had SICs
meeting the criteria outlined above. Twelve SICs on the list employ more than 1,000
persons in Santa Clara County. The other chemicals selected for analysis included mercury.
manganese, cadmium, beryllium, arsenic, nickel, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane.
methylene chloride, ethylene dichloride, benzene, formaldehyde, toluene diisocyan-
ate/methylene bis(phenylisocyanate), toluene, xylene, styrene, and perchlorethylene. No SICs
were identified for these chemicals using the above criteria. They do not represent the
entire list of substances regulated by OSHA, but do represent substances of recognized
toxicity with a meaningful number of inspections in the federal file.
4.3.2.2 IRI and OWI Rankings for Santa Clara County.
Tables 4-8 and 4-9 list the top industries in the IRI and OWI ranking systems. San::.
Clara County employment is included in both tables. Both the IRI and OWI rankings are
based on the use of NIOSH NOHS survey data to assess the chemicals in use in an indus-
try and to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular substance. NOHS
considered all possible exposures to every substance visually spotted in workplaces during
the survey. Because actual exposure levels were not measured, however, it is difficult to
evaluate which of the chemicals NOHS found in a specific SIC actually present hazards.
Nevertheless, the NOHS data consider a broad range of otherwise unreported substances
and use of RTECS data in the IRI enables a potency rating for hundreds of compounds.
A major problem with the NOHS data base for this particular project derives from its
age. Much of the industry in Santa Clara County is new and, more importantly, reflects
changing technology. Certainly the electronics industry as currently constituted is
markedly different than in 1972-74 when the survey was conducted during the original
NOHS survey. NIOSH visited only one establishment in SIC 3674. This establishment
employed less than 100 persons and therefore was excluded by NIOSH when their IRI
rankings were developed. Even if 3674 had been included the survey detected no arsine.
phosphine, or other substances currently in use in the industry. Therefore, for the
purposes of this survey, the OWI and IRI rankings are not entirely appropriate for several
industries for Santa Clara County. The IRI and OWI ranking methods are most useful
when listing industries which have not had major changes in chemical use during the past
decade.
The IRI data identify 28 SICs with more than 300 employees in the County and whL'h
are in the top 20% IRI ranking of all SICs (Table 4-8). There are 44 SICs in "the OWI
-65-
-------
Industries Not Included In Hlgh-IRER Ranking with High Exposures for Selected Substances (continued)
Substance
SIC
i
CTi
Lead 1711
1721
1731
1795
1744
2295
2865
3331
3412
3444
3452
3469
3484
3519
3535
3544
3569
3585
3613
3711
3728
3949
3993
4011
5082
5511
7535
753R
7692
a. IRFR - Inspection Rased Fxposure Rating
b. nee * not elsewhere classified
no data for this SIC
Nun of
Industry Insps
Plumbing, heating, air condlt.
Painting, paper hanging.
decorating
Electrical work
Wrecking and demolition
Special trade contractors nee
Coated fabrics, not rubberized
Cyclic crudes and Intermediates
Primary zinc
Plumbing fittings and brass goods
Sheet metal work
Bolts, nuts, rivets and washers
Metal stampings, nee
Small arms
Internal combustion engines nee
Conveyors and conveying equipment
Special dies, tools
General Industrial machinery nee
Refrigeration and heating equip.
Swltchgear and switchboard
apparatus
Motor vehicles and car bodies
Aircraft equipment, nee
Sporting and athletic goods nee
Signs and advertising
Railroads, line-haul operating
Construction and mining machinery
New A used car dealers
Paint shops
General automotive repair shops
Welding repair
5
9
4
3
R
3
4
4
4
7
6
5
4
12
4
3
5
17
5
20
3
7
5
5
3
14
3
11
3
Mean
proptn
of PEL
1.31
1.62
3.63
1.75
7.26
1.01
2.44
1.15
1.74
1.25
1.0?
5.19
5.25
1.41
6.73
2.56
24.34
1.03
5.47
1.40
12.68
1.26
1.67
1.68
1.4?
2.07
2.20
1.7?
12.62
IRF.R
Rank
117
111
214
175
154
116
103
131
181
85
120
89
121
177
139
88
87
91
114
100
234
166
189
10?
155
255
187
163
80
Hum of
Firms in
SC Cnty
340
196
*
286
11
218
•
•
•
1
90
8
19
2
2
7
32
21
4
9
10
3
34
18
?
n
103
16
451
47
Num em-
plyd in
SC Cnty
4015
1125
3471
134
1334
•
•
•
2
1S21
59
305
5
6
50
528
405
42
190
2549
10
203
144
4?
166
4?88
131
1717
245
-------
TABLE 4-8 (cont'd)
INDUSIRIES RANKED IN TOP 20% Of INDUSIRIAL RISK INDEX (IRI)2
I
-------
TABLE 4-9 (cont'd)
INDUSTRIES RANKfO IN TOP 20% OF OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX (OWI)
7538
7539
3562
2/51
2599
3915
SIC OESCR
333'! PRIMARY ALUMINUM
7251 SHOE REPAIR. HAT CLEANING
3955 CARBON PAPIR, RIBBONS
7531 TOP AND ItODY REPAIR
TIRE REIREADNG. REPAIR
PAINT SHOPS
GENERAL AUTO REPAIR
AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR,NEC
BAIL AND ROLLER BEARINGS
COMMERCIAL PRINTING
FURNITURE FIXFURIS NEC
JLWFLLERS1 MATERIALS
PAPER COATING. GLAZES
1').
1
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
9
H
0
7
7
I)
1
9
9
9
7
M
3
2
3
?
(4
3
8
'l
7
2
"1
9
/
7
7
5
2
0
6
0
9
8
l|
'1
/
/
5
1
1)
/
IRI H IBI
RANK RATH
IN
369
m
62 •
_
_
.
.
_
17 •
72 •
205
_
1*6 •
_
3 "
229
2 •
9 •
.
123
.
260
272
.
.
126
66 •
235
88
302
188
.
82
1/9
96
366
1 //
189
50 «
132
IVi
Oil
121
TO
2
6
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
t
0
0
0
0
.
2
0
i|
1
6
0
2
t
0
3
2
l|
0
l|
0
0
O
•>
0
?
(1
II
0
S.C. COUN1Y
EMPLOYMENT
103
I'l
II 10
35
131
1717
718
83
829
130
6
100
23
5
t
109 /
135
18
1034
M65
182
1'l25
163
318
231
38M
'40
552
in
65
39
3
2350
92
7/0
I'l
6337
105
3'l
/"I
?(,',
101 /
-------
within these same parameters (Table 4-9). Twelve SICs, 7391, 5511, 4932, 5541, 2752, 172!
2834, 2751, 3479, 3544, 2821 and 7699 are in the top 20% ranking of both systems. While
recognizing the limits of these data bases, these industries were found to have a large
number of hazardous chemicals with a significant number of employees potentially exposed.
Additional investigations of these industries may be appropriate.
Many SICs with substantial employment and high rankings in IRI or OWI had low
IBER rankings. It is instructive to contrast two SICs, 3573 (electronic computing) and 3679
(electronic components) since they are large employers in Santa Clara County, rank in the
top 20% of the IRI and OWI respectively, and are low in the IBERS. In 3573 (electronic
computing), federal OSHA conducted 27 inspections during the period 1979-82 and sampled
for 20 substances. There were no overexposures and the measured exposures were very
low. These data reflect very few inspections and thus must be viewed with caution, but
there is no obvious pattern of overexposure. In 3679 (electronic components), there was a
significantly greater number of inspections, 252, during the same period of time and the
data indicate that there were occasional overexposures to lead, mercury, trichloroethylene,
copper, hydrogen chloride, isopropyl alcohol, manganese, tetrahydrofuran, and silica. A low
IBER ranking does not, therefore, imply that there were no. overexposures and that the
particular SIC should be eliminated from further consideration. A low ranking may
indicate that there was not a systematic pattern of overexposure. More in depth analysis of
the compliance data should be undertaken in cases where there is a low IBER ranking but
a high rank on IRI/OWI and/or high employment. An in-depth evaluation of the
compliance data would permit a determination of whether the identified overexposures
occurred in a single establishment or if overexposure was a consistent pattern. The
advantage of using the OSHA compliance data is that where there are a large number of
inspections within a SIC, more detailed analysis will reveal the characteristics of the
exposures, including exposure by job title.
Based on these considerations, industries in Santa Clara County with high employment
patterns and a high ranking in the OWI or IRI should be given a high priority for further
investigation especially if they also are high on the IBER ranking.
4.3.2.3 Overlap Among IRI, OWI, and IBER's
While recognizing the limitations of the OWI and IRI for this report, we have chosen
to determine OWI/IRI overlap with the IBER rankings in the belief that substantial
overlap between systems constitutes a reasonable approach to identifying hazardous
industries. If an industry appears on the top of several lists, it indicates that there is a
history of high exposures to a number of highly toxic substances and that a significant
number of workers are thought to be exposed.
With no consideration of employment in Santa Clara County, there were 71 SICs that
appeared in the top 20% of at least three out of the four composite IBER listings (Table
4-6). Of these 71, 10 SICs also appeared in the top 20% of the IRI listing of SICs, and 2o
were in the top 20% of the OWI list. There were 8 SICs that were in the top 20°o of all
three lists, 2821, 3731, 3715, 2851, 3269, 7699, 3479, and 3411 (Table 4-6). Of the 28
remaining SICs, 5 have no employment in Santa Clara County. The two largest SICs, 1761
and 7699, are characterized by being mainly small in individual company employment size.
e.g., 142 of 150 establishments in SIC 1761 employ less than 50 persons and 250 of 252
establishments in SIC 7699 employ less than 50. The SICs identified as being high in both
IBERS and either OWI or IRI represent industries deserving of follow-up to determine
whether similar patterns of exposure found in federal OSHA inspections are common to
Santa Clara County.
-73-
-------
TABLE 4-10
Worker Overexposure Citations in Santa Clara County
from CAL/OSHA Inspection Files 1979-84
SIC
Company
Standard
Violated
Substance
*
Inspec
Year
2649 Tag Industries Inc.
2879 Moyer Chemical Co.
3522 FMC Airline Equip. Div,
367 ** Powell Electronics
3'842 Hosmer Dorrance
5161 Jones Chemical Co.
8062 Santa Teresa Community
Hospital
5141(a)
5155(b)
3272 Sakrete 5141(a)
3296 Owens Corning Fiberglass 5141(b)
341 ** Lorentz Barrel & Drum 5155(c)
3489 FMC Ordnance Division 5155(b)
5155(b)
5141(a)
5155(c)
5155(c)
5141(a)
5141(c)
5155(c)
nuisance dust 1983
parathion, methyl 1979
parathion
silica 1982
silica. 1980
solvent mixture 1981
total dust, 1980
alum, welding fume
nuisance dust 1980
trichloroethylene 1982
trichloroethylene 1981
phosgene, hydrogen 1982
chloride gas
formaldehyde 1981
* 5141 m Control of Harmful Exposure to Employees
5155 - Airborne Contaminants
** no 4-digit SIC-code available
-75-
-------
able 4-11. Industries Ranked Potentially Hazardous In .Santa Clara County by Federal
SHA/HIOSH Data Rases.'
SIC
542
611
622
623
579
711
771
731
743
752
761
791
793
799
086
434
541
751
752
819
821
834
879
079
229
317
441
444
469
471
479
499
511
544
545
559
561
569
573
599
652
662
674'
679
769
811
999
932
081
084
093
511
541
216
349
391
394
395
397
399
538
539
699
1021
:06?
071
1072
7TW
Description
Nonresldential construction, nee.
Highway and street construction.
Bridge, tunnel, and elevated highway.
Water, sewer, and utility lines.
Heavy construction, nee.
Plumbing, heating, air conditioning.
Painting, paper hanging, decorating.
Electrical work.
Terrazzo, tile, marble, mosaic work.
Floor laying and floor work, nee.
Roofing and sheet metal work.
Structural and steel erection.
Glass and glazing work.
Special trade contractors, nee.
Rottled and canned soft drinks.
Wood kitchen cabinets.
Wood partitions and fixtures.
Commercial printing, letterpress.
Commercial printing, lithographic.
Industrial Inorganic chemicals, nee.
Plastics materials and resins.
Pharmaceutical preparations.
Agricultural chemicals, nee.
Miscellaneous plastics products.
Pressed A blown glass, nee.
Blast furnaces A steel mills.
Fabricated structural metal.
Sheet metal work.
Metal stampings, nee.
Plating 1 Polishing
Metal coating A allied services
Fabricated metal products, nee.
Turbines A Turbine generator sets.
Special dies, tools, digs. A fixtures.
Machine tool accessories.
Special Industry machinery, nee.
Pumps A pumping equipment.
General Industrial machinery, nee.
Electronic computing equipment.
Machinery, except electrical.
Phonograph records.
Radio A TV communication equipment.
Semiconductors A related devices.
Electronic components nee.
Space vehicle equipment, nee.
Engineering A scientific instruments.
Manufacturing Industries, nee.
Gas A other services combined.
Comerdal machines A equipment.
Industrial machinery A equipment.
Scrap A waste materials.
New A used car dealers.
Gasoline service stations.
Dry cleaning plants, except rug.
Building maintenance services, nee.
Research A development laboratories.
Equipment rental.
Photoflnlshlng laboratories.
Commercial testing laboratories.
Business services, nee.
General automotive repair shops.
Automotive repair shops.
Repair services, nee.
Office of dentists.
General medical A surgical hospitals.
Medical laboratories.
Hentil laboratories.
T employees In the county.
Ranked High 1r
No of
Fmpl IRFB6 OUTC IOId
1279
96R *
330 *
770
430
4015 •
1175 *
3471 *
323 *
4R4 *
1425 • •
377 *
376 *
1334 *
351 •
349 *
318 *
fl?Q * *
1652 * *
636 *
303 * •
1097 • *
100R
7RRR
307
394
712 *
1571
305
1034 *
660 • * *
552 • »
2350 *
52R * •
3R4 *
1017 *
300
405 *
70.S06 •
6337 *
306 *
73,075
57..1R7
23.849 •
465 *
4680 *
2375 •
7307 * *
7943 *
1123
372 •
47RR * •
7774 • •
753
2K45 •
14,603 * •
1465 •
1077 •
1735
7111 *
1717
71R •
1043 « • •
770 ' •
14,277
4«? •
360
i
Spec
Chen
*
*
•
*
»
•
*
*
*
•
•
*
'• Inspection Rased on Exposure Ratings
• ™» • yi,w i
-------
TABLE 4-12
Substances Contributing to High IRER Ranks for Selected SICs.
SIC
1542
1611
1622
1623
1629
1711
1721
1731
1743
1752
1761
1791
1793
1799
2086
2434
1 Substances
1 Substances Sampled by Substances with Levels at or over PFL
Industry 1n OWIa OSHAb Found 1n OSHA Inspections0
Presidential 282*
construction.
n.e.c.
Highway ft street 192*
construction
Bridge, tunnel 222*
ft elevated
highway
Water, sewer ft 222*
utility lines
Heavy construction, 222*
n.e.c.
PlunMng, heating 219*
ft air conditioning
Painting, paper 154*
hanging, deco-
rating
Electrical work 235*
Terrazzo, tile, 203*
marble, mosaic
work
Floor laying ft 150*
floor work, n.e.c.
Roofing ft sheet 22fi*
metal work
Structural ft steel 225*
erection
Glass ft glazing 225*
work
Special trade 225*
contractors, n.e.c.
Bottled ft canned 21A
soft drinks
Wood kitchen 705
cabinets
11 1.
5
15 1.
11 1.
27 1.
31 1.
2.
37 1.
2.
13 1.
1
10
25 1.
13
1
11? 1.
2.
3.
11 1.
22 1.
2.
silica 2. asbestos
lead arsenate 2. silica
asbestos
silica
asbestos 3. chromates
lead 4. copper funes
silica 3. lead
total dust
lead
coal tar pitch volatlles
lead 4. asbestos
silica 5. nuisance dust
total dust 6. toluene
lead
wood dust, hardwood
toluene
-79-
-------
TABLE 4.12 (cont'd)
SIC
2541
2751
275?
2819
2821
2834
2879
3079
3229
331?
I Substances
t Substances Sampled hy Substances with Levels at or over PFL
Industry 1n n«Ia OSHAb Found 1n OSHA Inspections0
Wood partitions ft 217 13
fixtures
Commercial printing, ?fiO 81
letterpress
Commercial printing, 242 88
lithographic
Industrial Inorganic 472 94
chemicals, n.e.c.
Plastics materials * 25« 137
resins
Pharmaceutical 35fi IS
preparations
Agricultural ino 90
chemicals, n.e.c.
Misc. plastics 419 208
•products
Pressed ft blown 2fl 38
glass, n.e.c.
Blast furnaces A 388 105
steel mills
-80-
1.
?«
1.
?.
1.
?.
3.
1.
?.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
?.
I.
4.
5.
«.
1.
?,
1.
2.
3.
4.
R.
fi.
7.
lead arsenate
Isopropyl alcohol
lead arsenate
?>nutanone
(MF.K)
lead
silica
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
toluene
Isopropyl
alcohol
toluene
total dust
nuisance dust
hydrogen chloride ^
vinyl chloride
lead arsenate
lead
silica
toluene-?.
4-
-------
TABLE 4-12 (cont'd)
SIC
3441
3444
3469
3471
3479
3499
I Substances
1 Substances Sampled hy Substances with Levels at or over PFL
Industry 1n OWIa OSHAh Found 1n OSHA Inspections0
Fabricated 265
structural
metal
Sheet metal work 228
Metal stampings. 767
n.e.c.
Plating * ?57
polishing
Metal coating and 165
allied services
Fabricated metal 275
111 1.
?.
3.
4.
5.
6.
73 1.
?.
3.
56 1.
103 1.
2.
3.
4.
122 1.
?.
3.
88 1.
2.
lead
lead arsenate
zinc oxide
fumes
silica
xylene
nuisance dust
lead arsenate
copper fumes
nuisance dust
lead arsenate
silica
lead arsenate
total dust
trlchloro-
ethylene
silica
coal tar pitch
volatiles
zinc chloride
fume
lead
Iron oxide
7.
8.
9.
in.
4.
5.
6.
5.
6.
7.
4.
5.
fi.
4.
5.
copper funes
total dust
manganese *
cnprls
Iron oxide funes
Iron oxide funes
manganese *
cnpds
lead
copper dusts
hydrogen
chloride
chronates
xylene
chronic acid
toluene-?,
4-di isocyanate
(TOI)
Zinc oxide fune
copper fune
fume
3. xylene
3511 Turbines & ?34
turbine generator sets
3544 Special dies, tools. 254
jigs 4 fixtures
3545 Machine tool
accessories
3559 Special Industry
machinery, n.e.c.
3561 Pumps A pumping
eqpt.
3569 Gen. Industrial
machinery, n.e.c.
254
1*4
211
29fi
252
20
48
57
90
48
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
cobalt
silica
lead
silica
lead
2. cutting oil nist
2. lead
3. Iron oxide funes
4. nuisance dust
. chromic add A chromates
-81-
-------
TABLE 4-12 (conf d)
SIC
3573
3509
3652
3662
3674
3679
3711
3769
3811
3999
4932
5081
5084
5093
5511
5541
5921
5999
7216
* Substances
1 Substances Sampled by Substances with Levels at or over PFI
Industry In OWIa OSHA15 Found 1n DSHA Inspections0
El«ctron1c computing
equipment
Machinery, except
electrical, n.e.c.
Phonograph records
Radio 4 TV communi-
cation equipment
Semiconductors 4
related devices
Electronic
components, n.e.c.
Motor vehicles *
car bodies
Space vehicle
eqpt., n.e.c.
Engineering 4
scientific eqpt.
Manufacturing
Industries, n.e.c.
Gas A other.
services combined
Comnerlcal machines
* eqpt.
Industrial
machinery X eqpt.
Scrap 4 waste
materials
New 4 used car
dealers
Gasoline service
stations
Liquor stores
M1sc. retail stores
Dry .cleaning-
m
269
66
362
47
379
241
23
347
247
226*
226*
226*
134*
253*
148*
87*
93*
176*
42
80 1. silica
2. lead
3. nuisance dust
4
86 1. lead
2. chromic acid 4
128 1. lead
?. Isopropyl
alcohol
171 1. nuisance dust
2. lead arsenate
17.8 1. lead
2. lead arsenatp
3. chromic acid A
chronates
8
63 1. nuisance dust
82 1. toluene
12
2
43 1. lead arsenate
2. lead
57 1. lead arsenate
3
2
in 1. tetrachloroeth;
4. Iron oxide fune
5. chromic acid n
chronates
chronates
3. tetrachloro
ethyl ene
4. Iron oxHe fune
3. copper dusts
4. Isopropyl
alcohol-
4. nethylene
blsphenyl
isocyanate
(MOD
2. lead arsenate
2. styrene
3. copper fune
4. iron oxide fune
2. toluene
ylene
plants, except
rugs
-82-
-------
TABLE 4-12 (cont'd)
i Substances
I Substances Sampled by Substances with Levels at or over PEL
1n OWI* OSHAb Found 1n OSHA Inspections0
SIC Industry
7349 Building 120*
maintenance
services, n.e.c.
7391 Research & 331*
development
laboratories
7392 Management & public 331*
relations
12
7394
7395
7397
7399
7538
7539
7699
8011
8021
8062
8071
8072
8111
8931
i.
b.
c.
Equipment rental
Photof1n1sh1ng
laboratories
Commercial testing
laboratories
Business services,
n.e.c.
Ren. automotive
repair shops
Automotive repair
shops
Repair services,
n.e.c.
Offices of
physicians
Offices of
dentists
331*
331*
331*
331*
179*
179*
221*
11«*
43*
Gen. Medical A 444*
surgical hospitals
Medical
laboratories
Dental
laboratories
Legal services
Accounting,
auditing, A
bookkeeping
Total substances per
Total substances per
Listed 1n descending
102*
102*
75*
74*
SIC 1n
SIC rep
order b
fi
12
70
47
4? l. lead 3. lead arsenate
2. Iron oxide funes
Sfi
10
%4
1. lead
2. lead arsenate
1. lead 3. asbestos
2. Iron oxide fumes
1. formaldehyde
2. ethrane
. xylene
The OSHA Weighted Index 1s calculated only for 3-d1g1t SIC's 1n
Industries (010 to 179 and 400 to 900). Therefore thi» number of substances will be
the same for any normanufactuHng SIC whose first 3 digits are the sane.
-83-
-------
4.5 Discussion
The development of industry ranking schemes has not yet been discussed in the con-
text of how the information is to be used in Santa Clara County. The six uses of informa-
tion include: 1) intervention; 2) tracking of exposure or control of exposure over time; 3)
planning; 4) research; 5) as a complement to disease surveillance; and 6) standard setting.
4.5.1 Intervention.
Where an exposure is determined to be excessive, such that violation of standards exist
or there is documented illness, intervention by appropriate authorities is highly relevant.
The possible intervening agencies in Santa Clara County include CAL/OSHA, NIOSH,
Department of Health Services (HESIS and Epidtmiologic Studies Unit), and the occupa-
tional health section within the Santa Clara County Health Department. For these agencies
the approach to industry ranking may be different from one using the information for
other purposes, e.g., research. Industries which have substantial employment in the county
and a history of high measured exposures should have the highest priority for follow-up
and resource allocation. Industries which rank high in the IBERS or have documented high
exposures to particular agents should be given the highest priority by the intervening
agency. Even industries which are small employers may require a high priority if exces-
sive exposures are anticipated. Where the potentially important SIC is made up of a large
number of small employers the intervention may be conducted in two phases, a problem
identification phase followed by an extensive education campaign or a requirement for
environmental and biological monitoring.
Those industries high in the OWI or IRI but having low measured exposures would not
be a high priority for an intervention agency. For example, CAL/OSHA's compliance
effort is not likely to have a major impact on industries in which the measured exposure
levels are low. The semiconductor industry is an obvious case in point. Regulatory
agencies generally are guided by their promulgated standards and have less flexibility in
circumstances where the measured exposures are low.
4.5.2 Tracking of exposures over time.
All the approaches developed for ranking industry are appropriate here, and all the
agencies previously defined will have an interest in this category. Presumably CAL/OSHA
or the county has the lead in establishing baseline conditions, i.e. determining the degree
of exposure in a particular industry at a particular time. No agency has the resources to
continually monitor exposures in each industry with suspected problems over time and that
is why CAL/OSHA conducts spot checks, (surprise) inspections, on an ongoing basis.
Unfortunately, that approach leaves great gaps in the data available. The burden for
ongoing monitoring could be undertaken by the affected establishments. CAL/OSHA or
Santa Clara County could establish requirements for environmental monitoring by industry
or by specific chemical. Such rules would spell out the chemicals required to be monitored,
the levels at which monitoring needs to be initiated, e.g., at some "action level", reporting
requirements, and other provisions which enable the tracking of chemical exposure over
time while placing limited burdens on the affected industries. Under such a program,
industries would have to report use of certain chemicals limited to those with significant
toxicity, e.g., lead, silica, and carcinogens, and report the monitoring results to the agency.
A major role of regulatory bodies would then be to review the monitoring results and do
spot checks on the adequacy of the monitoring programs.
-84-
-------
4.5.3 Planning.
The agencies involved in planning are very wide ranging and include CAL/OSHA,
Department of Health Services, Santa Clara County Health Department, local planning
agencies, hospitals, clinics etc. Planning can include assessing clinical services available to
handle a catastrophic event, such as a chemical explosion or uncontrolled release,
emergency room capability, planning of health services within an industry, e.g., medical
screening, biological monitoring, and routine medical capability, to resource allocation and
the planning of inspection priorities by CAL/OSHA. The role of the County in the plan-
ning to address catastrophes and accidents is especially important. The industry ranking
schemes which focus on industries with a history of high exposures are relevant to all
agencies involved in health planning. However, the limitations of the data bases are such
that we do not believe that the ranking systems defined here are as yet adequate for a
systematic approach to health care planning. This area requires specific follow-up
subsequent to this report. Specific planning around crisis intervention, emergency room
facilities, and response to catastrophic events deserves special attention given that certain
industries use large quantities of highly toxic materials.
4.5.4 Research.
The principal agencies concerned with conducting research in workplace settings are
NIOSH, Department of Health Services, the Northern and Southern Occupational Health
Centers, and to a limited extent, CAL/OSHA. The relevance of the ranking schemes to
researchers depends on the nature of the specific research objective. Identification of
industries with significant exposures to regulated chemicals with well-known health effects
may be of little interest to the researcher whose goal is to discover new etiologic
relationships in industries with excess morbidity or mortality. On the other hand, use of
the NIOSH NOHS data, to identify unregulated chemicals for research purposes, may be of
particular value. Therefore, the IRI and OWI rankings may have special significance to
the researcher. Data from the OSHA MIS does have relevance to the researcher who is
assessing the adequacy of a particular standard insofar as he/she wishes to study expo-
sures below the current standards. For example, an industry with a history of exposures
to particular solvents at levels below the OSHA standard may be an important environment
in which to study the long term CNS effects of low level exposure. The utility of the
rankings for the researcher therefore ultimately depend on the specific research hypothesis.
4.5.5 Complement to Disease Surveillance.
Rankings which focus on "specific chemicals" as opposed to multiple exposures are
most appropriate here. Identification of industries with a history of exposure to lead
represents a good example of the use of the ranking systems in combination with disease
surveillance/biological monitoring programs.
4.5.6 Standard setting.
Use of the OSHA MIS data to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular
substance and to assess the magnitude of that exposure are two important aspects of
standard setting. Use of the information to identify populations at risk below the standard
also represent an important application of the information. The NOHS based information
has utility here insofar as it identifies user populations not identified by the OSHA MIS
-85-
-------
and may be used to provide estimates of the number of workers exposed to a particular
chemical. CAL/OSHA would be the prime user of ranking methods for standard setting
purposes.
The following section of this report consists of detailed profiles of six industries
which, using the criteria and methods discussed above, are among those Santa Clara County
industries which should serve as a focus for future regulatory and research efforts.
REFERENCES
1. Froines J. R., Dellenbaugh, C. A., Seabrook, S. S., and Wegman, D. H., "A Profile of
Occupational Health Experience in Los Angeles County.", Report to the Department
of Health Services, State of California, 1984.
2. National Occupational Hazard Survey: Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables.
DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 78-114. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office,
1977.
3. National Occupational Hazard Survey: Survey Manual. DHEW (NIOSH) Publication
No. 74-727. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office, 1974.
4. Mendeloff J. "An Analysis of OSHA Health Inspection Data." Office of Technology
Assessment, U.S. Congress, 1983.
5. Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies (NIOSH): NOHS-
RTECS Model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational Groups.
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 83-117. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office,
1983.
6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Registry of Toxic Effects of
Chemical Substances, 1980 Edition. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 83-107-3. Wash-
ington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office, 1983.
7. Office of Compliance Planning (OSHA): Appendix A: Health Inspection Plan, OSHA
Instruction CPL 2.25B, 1981.
8. Froines, J., Wegman, D., Dellenbaugh, C. "An Approach to the Characteristics of
Silica Exposure in U.S. Industry". Submitted to American Journal of Industrial
Medicine.
-86-
-------
5, INDUSTRY PROFILES
The six industry profiles presented in this section are intended to convey a general
understanding of the chief processes and key occupational health hazards in each industry,
and to review in detail the exposure data for each industry provided by the major
databases consulted for this report, as described in Section 4.
Specifically, the profiles make use of 1) the NIOSH Industrial File, giving
employment demographics in Santa Clara County for each industry; 2) the NIOSH National
Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS) and/or the NIOSH National Occupational Exposure
Survey (NOES), identifying hazardous substances used in each industry, and the NIOSH
Industry Risk Index and the OSHA Weighted Index rankings of each industry based on
NOHS data; 3) federal OSHA inspection data, 1979-82, and the IBER ranking derived from
these data; 4) CAL/OSHA inspection data; and 5) NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations. In
addition, the profiles review occupational illness statistics from relevant databases
maintained by the California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) which are
described in Section 2. We note that in using DLSR statistics, categorizations of industry
(e.g. "government" vs. "non-government") were modified to allow certain comparisons with
the NIOSH Industrial File, and therefore do not reflect designations in DLSR publications.
Due to differences in the availability or applicability of data from a given source
for a given industry, the particular data sources used in each profile vary.
In selecting industries for profiles, we sought industries which are relatively large
employers in the county, and which, by virtue of the hazards present, merited a more
detailed discussion. Each industry profiled employs at least 1,000 workers in the county
and together these industries represent about 102,000 employees, or roughly 16% of the
total Santa Clara County workforce. Each industry profiled has also been identified from
the data sources reviewed as a source of significant actual or potential worker exposures to
hazardous materials, or of important unresolved occupational health issues. The six
industries are not intended to represent all major hazardous industries in the county,
however, nor do they represent all suitable targets for further regulatory or research
endeavor. Rather, the profiles are offered as a starting point for selecting priorities and
focusing occupational health efforts in the county.
-87-
-------
5.1 Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674)
5.1.1 Introduction
The semiconductor industry is profiled based on its high contribution to Santa Clara
County employment, and extensive use of hazardous materials.
The semiconductor industry presents certain unique considerations in terms of
occupational health. It is a fairly new, expanding, and technically innovative industry,
involving certain processes developed specifically for its own use. New processes and
materials usage have resulted in an occupational environment with many previously
uncharacterized exposures and their corresponding potential health risks.
The industry has been the focus of a special CAL/OSHA task force in 1981, of a
NIOSH-directed health hazard study of the electronics industry, also in 1981, of a NIOSH
Control Technology assessment in 1982-84, and of various analyses made by individual
occupational health professionals, some of which have been collected in a 1986 one-volume
review (LaDou).
5.1.2 Santa Clara County Demographics of the Semiconductor Industry
Semiconductors and related devices -- SIC 3674 -- contains the second highest
employment of any industry in Santa Clara County listed in the 1985 NIOSH Industrial
File, with a total employment of 52,187, about 8% of the county's workforce. The vast
majority (85%) of people employed by the industry in the county work in firms with 250
or-more employees, while 11% are employed by firms with between 50 and 249 employees.
and 4% by firms with fewer than 50 employees. Altogether, there are a total of 265
semiconductor companies in the county, of which 32 (12%) employ 250 or more people, 52
(20%) employ between 50 and 249 people, and 181 (68%) employ fewer than 50 people. The
ten largest firms together employ 33,210 people, or over 60% of the county's semi-conduciui
workforce.
The semiconductor industry is atypical of manufacturing industries as a whole, in
that a large percentage of total employees in a firm do not work in fabrication or
production. In the 1980-81 CAL/OSHA study of the semiconductor industry, a survey of
42 semiconductor firms found 29.9% of workers to be involved in fabrication and
maintenance operations. In the four in-depth control technology surveys of semiconductor
plants performed by NIOSH and published in 1984, the ratio of production to
non-production workers was stated as substantially higher, ranging from 52% to 65%; but
not all workers included in production totals for these plants worked in clean rooms or
actual fabrication areas. Thus, a significant proportion of the total worker population in
semiconductor plants is not directly at risk of exposure from fabrication-related hazards.
Among fabrication workers, most are young (18-30 years old), and many are female:
one source estimates that women comprise 75% of the production workforce in the
electronics industry as a whole, though not specifically of the semiconductor industry/^
5.1.3 Semiconductor Fabrication
The dominant products of the semiconductor industry in Santa Clara County are
discrete and integrated circuit (1C) devices. Production of these microelectronic circuits
-88-
-------
involves the formation of electron-pair bonds (electrodes) in a wafer of silicon or other
material. Some establishments also produce the wafer material and wafers to be used as
substrates for the microcircuit. Though highly complex and varied, the basic processes of
microcircuit fabrication involve 1) preparing the wafer, 2) creating circuit patterns on the
wafer by photochemical processes, 3) etching the circuit patterns on the wafer, 4) "doping1
the circuit patterns with ions to produce the electron-pair bonds which compose the circuit.
5) depositing patterns of aluminum or other conductive material on the wafer to connect
the circuits and provide contacts for attaching leads, 6) cutting the wafer into chips, 7)
encapsulating the chips in ceramic, and 8) attaching metal leads. During various stages of
this process, the wafer is cleaned by chemicals or water. Each part of the process is
associated with specific hazards. A flow chart of semiconductor processes is shown in
Figure 5.1-1.
5.1.4 Potential Exposures
In the 1974 National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS), until 1985 the most
comprehensive systematic evaluation of occupational hazards in U.S. industries, only a
single firm in SIC 3674, with a total employment of 25, was surveyed. Consequently, the
Industry Risk Index (IRI) and the OSHA Weighted Index (OWI), both derived from NOHS
data, had no numerical ranking value for this industry.
The more recent NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) more
thoroughly assessed selected industries initially included in the NOHS. NOES data were
collected for 14 firms in SIC 3674, employing, collectively, 56,092 people. The survey
characterized the number and percentage of workers in surveyed firms potentially exposed
to 301 chemicals, mixtures, and processes identified in the industry.
Results of this survey are shown in Table 5.1-1. The substances to which the highesi
percentage of workers were found to be potentially exposed were isopropyl alcohol (4.23c!oi.
hydrogen fluoride (hydrofluoric acid, 3.99%), hydrogen peroxide (2.63%), hydrochloric acid
(2.56%) and nitrogen (2.49%). The list does not yet contain the ingredients of trade name
products. NIOSH has only recently begun to receive information on trade name material.
The 1981 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study, and the 1980-81 NIOSH Hazard
Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry (published 1985) similarly
recite an extensive list of hazards involved in various processes of manufacture, though
not as up to date as the NOES. The CAL/OSHA study collected information from a
questionnaire survey of 60 Santa Clara and San Mateo County semiconductor
manufacturers, combined with in-depth industrial hygiene evaluations of 13 voluntarily
participating firms. A summary of types of potential hazards and affected job categories
found in the CAL/OSHA study is shown in Table 5.1-2.
The NIOSH study relied on literature reviews and on walk-through surveys (i.e., in
which no monitoring was performed). Eight semiconductor plants were surveyed. A list of
materials used or generated in semiconductor manufacture taken from the NIOSH study is
shown in Table 5.1-3. This list lacks the NOES breakdown of the percentage of workers
who actually work with or near these materials, but does show their association with
specific processes.
-89-
-------
I
VŁ)
O
I
II Ml
•Alii
AwroiiiM
IICH
• Clit AIT OH HA
nuAiMim
•ASIIHAIII
IIIAIUIII
IMIf
1
HII
lAiH ^
fNOIOHiilU
P COAI
f Mil III
lirosum
1IAO
AIIACH
ruoi
at
„
*
Al
am mi
a i or
»ii
IACM
OllOf
IICH
„
•ICIH
i
„
j
in
Cl
0
fiir
MTl
t
rHOIOHiilil
Slllf
IA1IA1
OWIH
IfAHI
OSIIIOII
IQH
uuiiaM
WA| IN
lift
,
M
s
ic ;
Ct a
•f **
E5
*s
c«
Hi
25
S ^J
°s
Figure 5.1-1
Steps in Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication
Source: Hazard Assessment of the Electronic
Component Manufacturing Industry
(NIOSIl, 19O5)
-------
Table 5.1-1
NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES)
as of Jan. 17, 19R6, far
SIC 3674, Semiconductors and
Related Devices
i
VO
NUMBER OF PLANTS SURVEYED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ON PAYROLL
SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL
4 3 7 14 151 709 55232 56092
-------
C U.//.
3.1-1 \e. i
1CT-L
. *-•-1-
.<>!
.23
.»."-?-
.1-0
.00
f'"A2A"fc~r>"i)6"sc'' jPTi'iVf
**• JO PRESCRIPTION AVAILABLE **
J-»lG<4
X"OI 1
•10
IP
70
* * *
• • *
AVAILABLf
• *
* *
XOulO
,OJ
.PC
* » *
* **
» *
.n
2«
,7
.30
.On
.00
. ii
AVilLAhLE
3156ft
Jl«70
...0.1.
33?
Si
.. -..
2.30
.jr.
573
43
"915"
37
ESTEW
.00 ACTIVATOP.
i
vo
M
I
_
JI075
JI07«
I"
U?
05
17
51
.01
..M.
II
.00
r:UUPER-BASE
V .
.«.?».
IS2SO
259
"5
39b
AL
.00
"oo
:.LL'lo
I
Ib
•17570
D75»0
35«S5
12
7«?
"bi"
..18.
.o« Ap5EMC
too"" "A u"."' COLO -' «F"" u"N" K"^ 5Wfi
''"oh"
19
2?
r _ at vi i I-I--.-T "' •
-------
.f*n.. rL* •??Ł*.?I:.«t.
Ci-oJ.fi'
31
3«
63
06
.11
25 .C*;,I. |.IS*-«ll|i.!-'F mK
27 ,.y?...i»!y.'.._l!!i..T.tJ^.'.'Au.M...n.?JLCE..
~T'tS
.00 R.'ILEB '.'.'.C^ TPE/l-'fNT
I
22b
I
« ft
.00 i>Of?IC /.CIO
'0* POIIOv
2?0
..5.L
.9.7.
34
1
.•5
...1.?.
.00 bono i
.00 pnp.pt1
"Yoy"~;oiE
]. o > aopp ; T'• i cHLO? |OE
.oil"""oa'^KE"F'tO'lii" "
."0 PH.-..7E. Hl-1
17
I
.03
,'M.
.•5
16
0
,0f»
,.« ?.. .'Jiff.I :-.c. E.» V L f *iE
• .
r.°.°. P.?»..?/.?.v.! ll.fr.
^oi» r.fi'H'*4 OXIuE
".M(»""cV|Ej:irC;."Li"'"'f
' on
.. '7.
'.02
27
JO
32 a"
I.?.
IS*
17.
92
.27 2 .00
l*5fG |5 ,OJ 9 >o
,2ft ll ,6»»
.03 10 ^»p CHROf|C ACJO, t'*?TL('tl ?*s-f I'M)
CHROMIC *ciqf
.«•«"cMr."n"iu>«"ox"io
,00 CLE»"EK, «CIU1C
J«'337
13
J0234
.02
.1.0
CLEf ERt "El»l
"
710
IbS
"3*
.Oft
*[66 '""cob"ti"f""ox'f bŁ
.00 CU'.'T.-CT CE"ENT
.07
.03
27
IH
-------
riT't.
~ T:ir.L
' ""~
f.r"'LF '* rc.'''LE Table 5.1-1 (4): NOES
" ..... ' " "" ......... ' "" ' ...............................
it>
M33S
, »5
."5
.0 i
.«»'
CO 'T.'.CT
CO -f i'i'JOUS'^OTSE
COPPEP MTi-'.TE
I. 9? I iiS
FL-JID
01
00
13
7 (
r
r
r '
>.
f .
,i
9
**.
J«
. -6
,07
1
. -
«?(•
.?!
.0|
. >7
27
"«
fE>El.OfŁr<
'I727P
'.uC
.no
*>«?M
is .07 27 .wb cis»ERSFrr
2 .9? ,«? •'•!:" 1 1?
............... *""
12
. /a
8?2|7
Qvf,
.(»)
fl6§!
.0| 5
.0? .1? ^vT f?'1?.!^
..... .'•<» ............ is """ ..... .V»6 ""t»c"Hivic
S .01 ? ,00 E!i»V.Ff
...... .......... "
7«OIU
ft 135ft
IS*
.27
137
.no ETH/'.OL. 2-nUfQEVi"'iG"SOE
.(»•» FLUX, fiELDlNC FCA
9P660
266
js
' 9
SC
9*»
.SI
.01
.r>2
.09
.IR
27
it
"
J03IS
76622
"lib"
.00 GLASS CLAlJER
27
.UO GLVCCPOL
-------
ID
Cyo.l IDE
GOLD" POT VssnH"
G->E*SE
2
3
"12
i-HECL
II
31
.00
1'ii6" ME A f fRAj.SFEM d»
00
25
.J.32*.
A..A.3.
3.90
7 16
TiVi"
HYi ROGE'i
3 a
3«560 SO ,«»S 3
223 .4C 164
jo snj jo
J«|59 <1C .07 |0
.»«'
•°?
"«.o"
PK
.O'l
2 .DC . ."'O II'K.
jlO">9 J7 .'17 26 ,wO If«K,
i6 .03" 2" .no "r-k".
41 %!»7. 21 ^"0 J
1M63 3« .07 27" ."•nV"|"Po«i iixYf"E"(FE203)
237? C,23 1657 >Q ]SHPROP»L .'.LCOllOL
11769 51 .10 5 .r.« n
.??555 1.5.* ^2«»_ ?.« ,y.O ;L.;CCJER
J3J98 j»S .12 II ^««» L-.Yr;t»T
9«i"62 3 ,'i'l "3" ."66""TEA*""
3H .07 27 '.('0 LECITHINS
PoajR |oa3 I 8b 7|9 .<»> LO'lG "AVC RAPID FMEODEflCY
„_. 8I.6«0 a I.OS. 2? i,?A..L?J.|P^.
9J»57o
148 .26 60
60 .1 1 .? Al?-n---t^-C-^-!-'4?..t°P-M'^T-
"m> " .---------.-.-.-_.-.-.-_-.-..
39 rU7 27 .op »/G-'»ESIUM nT*'-*TF.
38
1
.07 27 ."0
.00 >*> 'VSTK GU-'
".i>2 9 ".i.o""v'Erici'iE",":J"Ec"
""bl l" C"ob""MERcUBY"cHLOR"l6E"VHGcL'2)"
T»f'T'|''T
..17.
1
-------
Table 5.1-1 (6): NOES
v Ft ''I i
.•.•nKKf>5 |iAZA~R~D~~tfE~sC'MPn(l''
tr,n tnii MET.iPrt?S[li|L_ilIC ACID, "I X-.SuDjH -i S/.LT
"[«| «" " "" .«••>" ftETH;f'C."'ilCMLbR6oiFL''l'p^
.^JL
112
. 1HIFLUORO
.10
44 a* ji ,1-1 -'OLD RELEASE
8*337 3«» >7""~ "31 /pV"MOLn~I'~it"c~rr"'*'
504(iii Ii7 ,19 92 -i.A MŁ>LL r.iLt'PIOE
5*510
63
1
.It
4=)
1
00
I , MAZAI.O
6«055
I.
«"•
C
;•
c
.. 1(3142 |
HOUll •> ,'M ,oC '.YLn'« (»-U"S-f~ONLY)
* >. 5?138 ?? .la' 10 ' ...0 UIL. CUTTI:--C
" "9?5co 56 .V6 'i Yoo""^ *"••"'
5?I3? 67 .12 21 ,0«> OIL, LUf-E
•tICKEL SL'LFATE
27
HO
MlUSb 34 .07
BI77« 2 .A?
K3I42 |7 I"i
604 ..jO I.'ITHC ACID
27
...2.
"o'«5"
"it* 1C »CfO, MAVG"»»it5t(?*)
00
(CBYJGENIc
S
2?
• •'0 OIL.
.no OIL. Ol'tl CHI.'.G
Jfil'j.5
.13
.P.?.
27
.«J OIL.
ACID
i
vO
jirtb9
JI064
1
5 '4
.••a
12
.6-1
.02
13
5
.i.l-
.00 --.i»i«
>0""* P; \'i 1,"" E'PiiXV"
.f'O
I 10 .21' 99 .fO P'.TT, i-EC
2. ,?(. ^l-1* fAWtFFI'i »-«XES AND
P?OCO 7 ."""i I ."iiV"p«ssj"vE"JpPSTUREar*""
4?49o I*>U .35 B30 .00 PRy LEAn-^F UNKNOWN
'"s'Uis""" I4«>"" .27 l"5T VoO""PDf"p"ALL,VorjM^MF""
u. .
30175
"jozob"
JL11.
310
00
-. 2-
tt
«_
.01
"02
2
..„.
49
.00
• *P
*.6b
JE'LLY
00
57740
1L
Ub
~~Ti 700 CHosPrtr.ic ACID, sooii"' S/.LT
578 .00 PH03PH?»IC ACID
BI65?
|57<40
1-1
9
.06
.?2.
1.74
I.S i
II
6
4 38
..
00
PHOSPHORUS ORO'UOE
-------
9J675
MI. .*<: .
75 .13
_5«»'i I. Oft
...0
,00
lit
06 VI i. OPE »
FIXE*
no
P
10
9*72'
167
01
I '«•> PL/.SMC*
"Q ,iin" PL*TIKG "SOLUTION"
.2 ,"!rt...r<~>LIS_H.
"7 .00 POLY X
3 .ui< PQLY'JSETHtHE REST' f»:OnS. I-0«-:L*)
31 .07 27 .no
• HAS26 2 OF 2 ' uO POLYVI'.VL P^SI'iS
•» - . . - ... ..... ........ .*__.._..• ^.........._..&...._...-_-_ ^- ..... - _ ........ -r ...__Ł ..... ...
6*400
ol
It
JH
CU'IlDE
15
61490
.13
10.'I OF
'.00 PPTASSlUM PE9'0 PROPJfTS OF CD"P'JST fOM.ALCOHOLS ?>*** SH'JRI CHiI» HVpUCC"
.01-
.10
61 .11 rj« .0°
I'J %PJ J 3 .1-0
>-»i25 "13 a .77 213 ••"•;"n'o"
'.i ^'5i»? I^S ^33. 10 ,"iO PYttnpLfnl'.'O'iEj 2-,
3
ICS
.01
76
.04
,00
, 3
10
h
"415
42
FLUX
310
19
13
, CPOXY
,f.o PESI.'. ''EC
".••6"
>0 RUSI
.f 1
07)10
10 .02
P0652 « .01
fcV^S J3 .0?
8)770 941 1.60
JJLi.
SB,
J"'l"NDWf4
37 liO SEALANT
5 frb""sEGM'E"NT*L" VfftR"A"fiO'"i
• ,9? SELENIUM
"aV6 .00"" SILANE
72 .00 SILA'IE, C"LORO-
TT2 loo JIL»'«E; •••
>? SILICA
Vn'o "siLicON
>Op__S|LICprj C.ARBIpE
'""""•••••• -r - ~ ~ ~ ~ ™ " ~ ^, •*»rt*i*~ •~ftJ l" rt O V l\ I
t»C"»
1.09
76
2
..oo
.16
.75
sii'icd'
?oa
on
(SlrL3)
-------
X TCiT;JL.
CODE
ijO 07 2**
h " >i V
ISU .2> V?
Table 5.U1 (8): NOES
:-"-'--"- .Yiz'.Vp'o'b'Es'cViP'fVoN" v
3IL!Cp"..J
SlLfcO.ES
anis
6)
.11
J'4
JM7I
J <• 1 1 1
.••**
J»H7
."1
J-C.
II
IA7
:t~
. SOt
JlnS?
.J.!.'V?S..
.oil
1
"n
-l OflLV)
f»M2
^1^2.
It 7
..i
2? ''tit STi.O JTIM-- TIU'.ATE
•• ----•-------^•------- • - • ± - - - »• --» - —_r - -»*•--•"-
50
.t'S
....A?.
2."I
22
.?!!.
nil
sf'LfUa"
1577
VI
0.1
"A'cT5'
5CIO
S;LI
Jf ?
I .00 ,»'J TAPE, COHESIVE
^^2 •*• 2. . .i1! 2 . ^i»'l Ti-.VTApIC fClPj
/I 197 *| j .02 7 ~C-it"l~FLL\,i*'lU''~
es
VŁ>
O>
3
5?
.mox 17.'
-Ift8-
125
T » , T 1 1 •; i 1 . 1 L'^'.'-if
P064H
1-7
.07
10
27
65
00
"CUtcOL
TTT
P0430
55
1.05 .
.".
..o
00
tt
,i*i 13 .00 VM 0»E3
.75 205 ^?.'^...'.'«..!.l!'JCSTctj---T.U>I.KNO*N_
M029
.PI
1
ii
.00 ,-
-------
Table 5.1-2
Potential Occupational Exposures
and Exposure Situations in the
Semiconductor Industry, as Identified
by the California Division of
Occupational Safety and Health
(Semiconductor Industry Study, 1981).
POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE EXPOSURES
The potential for acute exposures to a variety of toxic/corrosive/flamnable
chemicals and physical hazards are inherent in Semiconductor Industry
processing.
Job Categories - Plant and line maintenance workers, material handlers
"(chem techs), gas system personnel, wafer fabrication line workers
(a function of processing station/chemicals and adjacent areas), and
glassware/equipment cleaning technicians.
Types of Hazards:
Chemical and gas exposures
Non-ionizing radiation - RF, UV, IR, laser and cryogenic
Ionizing radiation - alpha, beta, gamma and x-ray
Physical hazards - shock and electrocution, back injury
Psychological - controlled environment, temperature, humidity, lighting
Repetitive tasks - fatigue, eyestrain (VDTs and biscopes), stress
Variables affecting hazards:
Workforce - age, sex, cultural composition, language
Intangibles - (fabrication employees) - generally, lack of technical
understanding of the task being performed and its relevancy/
importance to the finished product.
POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SITUATIONS
Materials Handling - Spillage, breakage, leakage, chemical mixing.
6as Systems - Leak diagnosis and testing; cylinder changes, handling and
purging; safety systems failure; dispensing system changes.
Emergency Response - Inadequate training/lack of adequate safety, protective
and test equipment.
Ventilation and Exhaust Scrubbing System - Failure of all or portions of
the system without providing fail-safe controls and back-up power.
Vjaste System - Handling, segregation of non-compatibles, carcinogens.
-99-
-------
Material
Abietic acid
Acetic acid
Acetone
Acetylene
Aluminum
Aluminum acetate
Aluminum oxide
Ammonia
Ammonium bifluoride
Ammonium chloride
Ammonium fluoride
Ammonium hydroxide
Ammonium persulfate
Aniline
Antimony
Antimony trioxide
Argon
Arsenic
Arsenic trichloride
Arsenic trioxide
Arsine
Asbestos
Beryllium
Beryllium oxide
Boric acid
Boron
Boron carbide
Boron nitride
Boron tribromide
Boron trichloride
Boron trifluoride
n-Butyl acetate
Cadmium
Calcium hydroxide
Calcium hypochloride
Process operation and/or application
Solder flux component
Metal and semiconductor etch component
Wafer cleaner, solvent
Welding gas
Metallization
Etch component
Packaging material: abrasive—wafer polish
Carrier gas—epitaxial deposition; plasma etch
component
Oxide etch component
Etch component
Oxide etch component
Wafer cleaner, etch component
Wafer cleaner, etch component
Solvent
Dopant (P-type)—diffusion, ion implantation,
crystal growth
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, crystal
growth
Carrier gas—ion implantation
Dopant (N-typel—diffusion, ion implantation,
crystal growth
Dopant (N-type) source—epitaxial deposition
Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion
Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Insulator, packaging material
Metallization
Insulator, packaging material
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation, crystal growth
Dopant (P-type)—diffusion, epitaxial deposi-
tion, ion implantation, crystal growth
Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Photoresist developer
Dopant (P-type)—epitaxial deposition, ion
implantation; solder component
Wastewater treatment
Etch component, oxidizer
Table 5.1-3
A list of common materials used or generated in
the manufacture of semiconductors.
Source: Hazard Assessment of the
Electronic Component Manufacturing
Industry (NIOSH, 1985)
-100-
-------
Material
Carbon dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Carbon tetrafluoride
Ceric ammonium nitrate
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chlorosilane
Chromic acid
Chromic oxide
Chromium
Chromium trioxide
Citric acid
Cobalt
Colophony (generic)
Copper
Copper nitrate
712D (trade name)
Deionized water
Detergent (generic)
Diamond
Diborane
Dichlorosilane
Diethyl telluride
Dimethyl formamide
Electroplating solutions (generic)
Epichlorohydrin
Epoxy resins and strippers
Ethanol
Ethanol amine
2-Ethoxy ethanol
Ethyl acetate
Ethylene glycol
FC-85 (trade name)
Ferric chloride
Fluoride
Fluoroboric acid
Fluorocarbons (chlorofluoro-
carbons)
Formaldehyde
Gallium
Process operation and/or application
Testing gas. coolant
Reducing gas—metallization, epitaxial
deposition
Nitride etch component
Etch component, oxidizer
Solvent, degreaser
Solvent, degreaser
Solvent, degreaser
Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion
implantation, crystal growth
Etch component, cleaning solution.
photoresist stripper solution component
Abrasive—wafer polishing
Metallization, plating operation
Crystal growth
Etch component
Conductor metal, packaging material
Solder flux
Conductor metal, metallization, packaging
material
Etch component, oxidizer
Negative photoresist stripper
Wafer cleaner, rinse, oxidization
Wafer cleaner
Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan-
tation, crystal growth
Dopant (N-type) source—epitaxial deposition
Solvent
Copper, gold, nickel, and silver plating
Epoxy resin component
Packaging material, crystal slicing
Wafer cleaner
Photoresist stripper component
Wafer cleaner, degreaser, solvent, photoresist
component
Solvent, degreaser
Photoresist remover
Wetting solution, photolithography
Etch component, oxidizer
Solder flux component
Dopant (P-type) source—epitaxial deposition.
crystal growth
Wafer cleaner, degreaser. solvent, cleaner.
dewaxing
Solder by-product gas
Dopant (P-type)—epitaxial deposition, ion
implantation, crystal growth; solder
component
Table 5.1-3 (2)
. A list of common materials used or generated in
the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued)
-101-
-------
Material
Gallium arsenic phosphide
Gallium arsenide
Gallium chloride
Gallium oxide
Gallium phosphide
Garnet
Germane
Germanium
Glycerine
Gold
Graphite
Helium
Hexamethyl disilizane (HMDS)
Hexane
Hydrobromic acid
Hydrochloric acid
Hydrofluoric acid
Hydrogen
Hydrogen chloride
Hydrogen peroxide
Tndium
Indium antimonide
Iodine
Isodecane
J-100 (trade name)
Krypton 85 '
Lacquer (paint and thinner)
Lead
Liquid nitrogen
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Methanol
2-Methoxyethyl acetate
Methylene chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Mixed acid etch*
Molybdenum
Nickel
Process operation and/or application
Semiconductor material
Semiconductor material
Dopant (P-type) source—epitaxial deposition
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, crystal
growth
Semiconductor material
Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing
Epitaxial deposition, crystal growth
Semiconductor material, metallization, solder
component
Etch component
Conductor metal, lead attachment, metalliza-
tion, solder component
High-temperature material—epitaxial deposi-
tion, metallization, crystal growth
Process and carrier gas, leak detector
Patterning, wafer surfactant
Solvent
Etch component
Etch component
Oxide and semiconductor etch component
Carrier gas—epitaxial deposition, annealing,
ion implantation
Gas phase etch, epitaxial deposition
Etch component, wafer cleaner, oxidizer
Dopant (P-type)—metallization: solder
component
Semiconductor material
Etch component, oxidizer
Photoresist component
Negative photoresist stripper
Leak testing
Coating
Solder component
Coolant
Packaging material, lead, material
Packaging material, lead material
Epitaxial deposition
Wafer cleaner, solvent
Solvent, degreaser
Solvent
Solvent
Solvent
Etch component
Packaging material, metallization
Packaging material, metallization, lead
material
•Combination of various acids, e.g.. hydrofluoric and nitric: hydrofluoric, nitric, and acetic: nitric and hydrochloric:
and nitric and sulfunc.
Table 5.1-3 (3)
A list of common materials used or generated in
the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued)
-102-
-------
Material
Nitric acid
Nitric oxide
Nitrogen
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitrous oxide
Oxygen
Ozone
Palladium
Paraffinic mineral oil
Perchloric acid
Phenol
Phosphine
Phosphoric acid
Phosphorus
Phosphorus oxychloride
Phosphorus pentoxide
Phosphoric tribromide
Photoresists (positive and
negative)
Photoresist developers
(positive and negative)
Photoresist rinses
Photoresist strippers
Platinum
Polyisoprene
Potassium dichromate
Potassium hydroxide
Potassium iodide
Propane
Propanol (1,1; 1,2: iso-; n-)
Rhodium
Selenium
Silane
Silica (amorphous, crystalline)
Silicon
Silicon carbide
Silicon dioxide
Silicon nitride
Silicone
Silicone rubber
Silver
Process operation and/or application
Metal and semiconductor etch component.
photoresist stripper component
By-product gas from etch tanks
Carrier gas—diffusion, epitaxial deposition;
bonding gas
By-product gas from etch tanks
By-product gas from etch tanks, epitaxial
deposition, passivation
Oxidization, passivation, bonding gas
Oxidation, by-product gas from ultraviolet
photoresist exposure step
Metallization
Pump lubrication
Etch component
J-100 component
Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation, passivation
Aluminum and semiconductor etch
Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Dopant (N-type! source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial
deposition, ion implantation
Photolithography
Photolithography
Photolithography
Photolithography
Metallization
Encapsulation material
Etch, oxidizer
Etch component
Photolithography
Fuel gas
Wafer cleaner, etch additive
Conduction metal, plating, packaging material
Dopant (N-type)—epitaxia! deposition
Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan-
tation, crystal growth
Glass, ceramic packages
Semiconductor material
Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing
Passivation coat and packaging material
Passivation coat and packaging material
Packaging material, pump lubrication
Packaging material
Conductor metal, metallization, solder
component
Table 5.1-3 (4)
A list of common materials used or generated in
the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued)
-103-
-------
Material
. Sodium hydroxide .
Solder and solder flux
Stoddard solvent
Sulfur hexafluoride
Sulfuric acid
Tellurium
Tetrachloroethy lene
Tetrachlorosilane
Tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide
Tin
Titanium
Toluene
Toluene diisocyanate (TDI)
Tributyl phosphate
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Trichloroethane (1,1.1)
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorosilane
Trifluoroethylene
Trimethyl gallium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Varnish
Wax
Xylene
Zinc
Zirconium
Zirconium oxide
Process operation and/or application
Etch component, wastewater treatment
Soldering
Wafer cleaner, degreaser
Gas phase etch component
Etch component, wafer cleaner, photoresist
stripper component
Metallization
Solvent
Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan-
tation, crystal growth
Etch component
Solder component
Metallization
Photoresist component, wafer cleaner, solvent,
varnish component
Flux component
Encapsulation material
Solvent
Solvent, degreaser
Wafer cleaner, degreaser, dewaxing, J-100,
component
Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan-
tation, crystal growth
Degreaser. wafer cleaner
Dopant (P-type) source—epitaxial deposition
Metallization
Metallization
Packaging material
Wafer mounting
Photoresist component, wafer cleaner, solvent
Dopant (P-type)—diffusion, epitaxial deposi-
tion: solder component
Metallization
Abrasive—wafer polishing
Table 5.1-3 (5)
A list of common materials used or generated in
• the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued)
-104-
-------
5.1.5 Actual Exposures
For this report, six sources of actual exposure data for the semiconductor industry
were reviewed. These sources included 1) Federal OSHA inspection data from 1979-82; 2)
nine NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's), three of which involved Santa Clara
County firms; 3) four NIOSH Control Technology surveys, one preliminary Control
Technology survey (two of which involved Santa Clara County firms), and two unpublished
NIOSH articles summarizing some of the monitoring data in the Control Technology
Reports; 4) the CAL/OSHA study; 5) twenty CAL/OSHA inspection case-files, representing
inspections at ten different semiconductor firms in Santa Clara County; and 6) industry
data provided by the Occupational Health Committee of the Semiconductor Industry
Association.
These separate sources and their respective findings are reviewed below, with a
general summary given at the end of the section.
5.1.5.1 OSHA Inspection Data. (1979-82)
During the three years for which data were analyzed, federal OSHA conducted 40
inspections of semiconductor firms (SIC 3674), during which a total of 318 exposure
samples were taken. These samples covered a total of 65 distinct substances. Findings of
overexposure were on the whole negligible. Only 10 out of the 65 substances were sampled
at higher than 20% of the OSHA PEL (permissible exposure limit) in any sample, and only
six were ever sampled at or above the PEL. Of the 318 total samples taken during these
inspections, only 14 exceeded the PEL. The substances most frequently sampled were
inorganic lead, 32.5% of inspections; isopropyl alcohol, 17.5% of inspections; chloroform,
15% of inspections; lead arsenate, 12.5% of inspections; and perchloroethylene, xylene,
arsenic and tin, monitored in 10% of inspections each. Substances for which at least one
sample at 50% or more of the PEL was obtained were beryllium, copper fume, iron oxide
fume, isopropyl alcohol, inorganic lead, and perchloroethylene; sampling results for these
substances are shown in Table 5.1-4. These same six were the only substances in SIC 3674
sampled at or above the PEL. (As shown in Table 5.1-4 the maximum proportion of the
PEL at which all six substances were sampled was greater than or equal to 1.00.)
Based on these inspections and monitoring results, the semiconductor industry was
ranked quite low. (i.e., non-hazardous) relative to other industries in terms of the number
and extent of significant exposures found. Using the IBER (Inspection Based Exposure
Ranking) system, SIC 3674 ranked 313 out of the 475 Industries ranked.
5.1.5.2 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's)
Since the inception of NIOSH in 1971, the agency has performed a number of HHE's
for SIC 3674, of which eight were reviewed for this report. These included HHE's for
FMC Corp., TRW Electronics, INMOS Corp., and Siemens Components (2 HHE's), all in
Colorado, and Signetics Corp. (2 HHE's) and Advanced Micro Devices, both in Sunnyvale in
Santa Clara County. An additional HHE for the University of Cincinnati (SIC 8221)
involving semiconductor manufacturing processes, was also included in the review.
Two of these HHE's, the one for Advanced Micro Devices, and one of the two
Signetics HHE's, were interim reports only: The Advanced Micro Devices report is still in
progress, while the Signetics HHE, begun in 1979, was never completed.
-105-
-------
Table 5.1-4
Federal OSHA Semiconductor Industry Inspections:
Substances with Sanple Exposures at or above
501 of the OSHA PEL
Substance
Reryll iun
Copper Fune
Iron Oxide Fune
Isopropyl Alcohol
Inorganic Lead
Perchloroethylene
Nun of
Insps
2
1
3
7
13
4
Nun of
expos
Samps
25
1
11
19
37
fl
Mean
Propor-
tion
of PF.L
0.39
i.no
0.34
0.14
0.23
0.34
Max
Propor-
tion
of PEL
16.50
1.00
1.00
1.42
5.00
1.34
Nun Insps
w/ sone
Sanp>PF.L
1
0
0
1
1
1
Nun of
Insps w/
Mean>PFL
0
0
0
0
1
1
Nun of
Sanps
> PFL
2
n
0
l
9
7.
-106-
-------
These HHE's were undertaken between 1977 and 1985, six at the request of
employers, and three at the request of employee representatives. Five of the HHE's
involved evaluation of both medical complaints and exposures; the remaining four involved
only exposure evaluations.
Environmental monitoring was performed in eight of the nine HHE's reviewed (the
Advanced Micro Devices interim report containing no sampling data). NIOSH investigators
gathered a total of 791 personal and area samples for 50 chemical substances. The
substances sampled were predominantly solvents, but also included acids, metals, and
particulates. Table 5.1-5 shows the chemicals identified, the number of HHE's in which
there was a measurement, the number of samples taken, the range of measured levels, and
the CAL/OSHA PEL'S (current) applicable to each substance.
As can be seen from the table, only two substances were sampled at levels above the
current CAL/OSHA PEL, 2-ethoxyethanol (ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, cellosolve), and
trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11). One other substance, chloroform, was measured above
the NIOSH criteria level but not above the higher CAL/OSHA standard. The high levels
for trichlorofluoromethane and chloroform were both obtained at the same plant (FMC).
All three of the chemicals with high levels were in use as solvents. The highest sampled
exposure for 2-ethoxyethanol was nearly twice the PEL; the highest for
trichlorofluoromethane was over six times the PEL; and the highest for chloroform (23
mg/m3) was over twice the NIOSH criteria level, but less than half the CAL/OSHA PEL
(50 mg/m3).
Work-related medical complaints discussed in the five HHE's which included them
were generally eye, nose, and throat irritation, light-headedness, and respiratory distress, all
common symptoms related to solvent and acid exposure. One HHE (AMD) also included
complaints of burns, and hydrogen chloride and other gas inhalation resulting in irritation
and CNS symptoms. Another HHE (Signetics) encountered complaints of narcosis as well
as irritation.
5.1.5.3 NIOSH Control Technology Reports
NIOSH Control Technology (CT) reports are performed to evaluate engineering and
other controls. In 1982-83, NIOSH conducted 21 preliminary walk-through surveys and 4
in-depth surveys of semi-conductor firms to characterize basic exposures, processes and
controls in the microelectronics industry, and to assess the suitability of controls used .
For this report, we reviewed all 4 in-depth surveys, involving NEC Electronics in Mountain
View, California, Fairchild Semiconductor in Maine, United Technologies Corporation
Mostek Facility in Texas, and Xerox Corporation in El Segundo, California; we also
reviewed the abstract of one of the walk-through surveys, performed at Comdial
Semiconductor, Inc. in Sunnyvale.
For the four in-depth surveys, NIOSH intentionally selected facilities with
sophisticated control procedures and technologies, so as to be able to identify desirable
control technology. The firms selected represented various levels of employment, from 220
(Xerox) to over 7,000 total employees (UT-Moskek). These surveys focused on 4 to 6 key
processes and systems, though slightly different processes were evaluated among the
different plants. Altogether, the process and systems evaluated included photolithography,
wet chemical etching and wet chemical stations, ion-implantation, radio frequency
operations in plasma etching, gas handling systems, gas distribution systems, diffusion
doping and chemical vapor deposition.
-107-
-------
Table 5.1-5
Substances Honltored In Eight NIOSH HHE's
For SIC 3674. 1977-85
Chemical
fHHE's
1n which * of
Sampled Samples
Range
PEL
acetone
aluminum oxide
alkanes
aluminum
acetic add
arsenic
n-butyl acetate
benzene
cellosolve acetate
chloroform
carbon monoxide
carbon dioxide
copper
Cristobal 1te
2-ethoxyethanol
ethyl acetate
formaldehyde
fluorides
hydrochloric add
hydrofluoric add
hydrogen peroxide
hydrazlne
Isopropanol
lead
methyl ethyl ketone
methyl chloroform
methyl Isobutyl ketone
methanol
methyl chloride
methyl ene chloride
nitric add
nickel
petroleum distillates
phosphoric add
phospMne
quartz
sulfuMc add
total partlculates
toluene
toluene 2,4, d11socyanate
tin
trlchloroethylene
1,1,1 trlchloroethane
tr1 ehl orof 1 uoroethane
trlehlorofluoromethane
xyl ene
zinc
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
4
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
3
4
1
5
1
34
2
16
5
19
6
28
3
24
4
5
7
3
3
6
2
1
7
11
33
3
4
41
10
37
21
20
9
16
18
31
3
15
6
4
3
6
8
56
8
3
10
30
92
14
82
10
NOa-34 mg/m3
NO-0. 00002 mg/m3
NO- 1.7 mg/m3
NO-0. 04 mg/m3
NO
NO
ND-23.3 mg/m3
NO
<0.01-75 mg/n3
<0. 01-23 mg/m3
NO -6 ppm
NT)
all <0.007 mg/mj
all <0.3 mg/m3
<0. 01-353 mgym3
8-13 mg/m3
NO
NO
<0.004-4.41 mg/m3
NO-0. 5 mg/m-3
0.04-0.33 mg/m3
<0.02
NO-45.8 mg/m3.
all <0.005 mg/3
<0.01-2.8 mg/m3
<0. 01-21 mg/m3
<0. 01-24 mg/m3
0.7-150 mg/m3
0.3-5.3 mg/m3
ND-2 mg/m3
NO-2.5 mg/m3
all <0.008 mg/m3
<0.1-35 mg/m3
NO
NO
all <0.03 mg/m;;
0.02-0.23 mg/m3
0.01-0.45 mg/m3
NO-fiO mg/m3
all <0.04 mg/sampje
all <0.035 mg/m3
2-57 mg/m3,
ND-124 mg/m3
0.34-1294 mg/m3
8-35,000 mg/m3
ND-19.2 mg/m3
<0. 002-0. 04 mg/m3
1780 mg/m3
10 mg/m3
No PEL
10 mg/m3
25 mg/m3
0.01 mg/m3
710 mg/n3
30 mg/m3
270 mg/m3
50 mg/m3
50 ppm
5000 ppm
0.2 mg/m3
b
185 mg/rr
1400 mg/m3
3 mg/m3
2.5 mg/m3
7 mg/m3
?. mg/m3
1.5 mg/m3
0.1 mg/m3
980 mg/m3
0.05 mg/m3
590 mg/m3
1900 mg/m3
205 mg/m3
260 mg/m3
105 mg/m3
360 mg/m3
30 mg/m3
1 mg/m3
525 mg/m3
1 mg/m3
0.4 mg/m3
b
1 mg/m3
10 mg/m3
375 mg/m3
0.14 mg/m3
? mg/m3
135 mg/m3
1900 mg/m3
7600 mg/m3
SfiOO mg/q3
435 mgZnr
5 mg/m3
- not detectable
b - PEL must be calculated from percent of substance 1n total dust.
-108-
-------
In the course of the surveys, several hundred samples were taken for various
chemical and physical hazards, including arsine, phosphine and diborane gases, hydrofluoric
and sulfuric acids, phosphorous oxychloride, cellosolve, methyl cellosolve, xylene, acetone,
MEK, antimony, X-ray radiation, radio frequency, and UV light.
Most monitored levels were considerably below established PEL'S. Key exceptions
were arsenic present in ion-implantation, and radio frequency emissions from plasma
etching or cleaning operations. Area samples in the ion-implanter detected very high levels
of arsenic, up to 14,361 g/m^ in one instance. However, personal samples for operators
and maintenance personnel were well below the PEL of 10 g/m^.
5.1.5.4 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study (1981)
Responding to concerns about potential health hazards in the electronics industry,
CAL/OSHA initiated a survey research project in 1980 that eventually included 13
manufacturers of semiconductors in the Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties (Silicon
Valley). The final report, the Semiconductor Industry Study. 1981, covered process
descriptions, relevant hazards, monitoring results, toxicological analysis, and conclusions and
recommendations.
Industrial hygiene monitoring in this study covered the following substances:
Acetic acid
Acetone
Aliphatic amines
Aminoethanol compounds
Ammonia
Antimony
Arsenic
Arsine
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Butyl acetate
Butyl alcohol
Chlorinated benzene
Chromic acid & Chromates
Gallium
Hydrochloric acid
Hydrofluoric acid
Isopropyl alcohol
Lead
Methyl alcohol
Methylene chloride
Morpholine
Nitric acid
Nuisance dust
Phenol
Phosphoric acid
Phosphorus
Potassium hydroxide
Silica (crystalline)
-109-
-------
Sodium hydroxide
Sulfuric acid
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Turpentine
1,1,2-trichloro 1,1,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Trichloroethylene
Xylene
Generally, monitoring results taken during normal processing routines were very low.
Few accurate monitoring samples could be taken during maintenance/system malfunction
operations due to the transient and sporadic nature of this type of potential exposure. In
routine operations, overexposures were found for methanol and inorganic arsenic m silicon
ingot and wafer processing. Overexposures during maintenance operations were found when
sampling methylene chloride in silicon ingot and wafer processing, and inorganic arsenic in
silicon device manufacturing and LED (Light Emitting Diode) device processing. Exposure
dose levels for these substances are shown in Table 5.1-6.
5.1.5.5 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data
We reviewed 10 firms in Santa Clara County with a total of 20 inspections in
CAL/OSHA inspection files, and found no exposures over the current CAL/OSHA PEL.
Only one substance, ethyl
acetate, was monitored at or above 50% of the PEL. Monitoring was done for six
substances: these included arsenic, xylene, ethyl acetate, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1
trichloroethane, and arsine. The range of concentrations found for each substance is
shown in Table 5.1-7.
In addition, a number of chemical substances were investigated, but no monitoring
was done. These substances included:
4-dimethylaminoazobenzene
benzidine hydrochloride
hydrochloric acid
phosphine
acetone
alcohol
phosphoric acid
freon
etching cleaner/aqua regia
benzaldehyde
arsenic/arsine
Inspection files were reviewed for Ion Implant Services, Hewlett-Packard, Fairchild
Camera and Instrument Corporation, Teledyne MEC, Litronix, Toshiba Semiconductor,
General Instrument Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Signetics Corporation, and Apple
Computer.
-110-
-------
Table 5.1-6
CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study, 1981:
Substances with Monitored Overexposures
Chemical Dose (Exposure level/PFL)
methanol 1.4R
1.27
1.55
nethylene chloride 1.31
arsenic 1.0
fi.4
5.2
1.0
1.5
-111-
-------
Table 5.1-7
CAL/OSHA Monitoring Data from Inspections of
Ten Santa Clara County Finns, 1979-84
Data Represent 20 Inspections
Chenical Air Concentrations (range) Current CAL/OSHA
PFL
arsenic 0.0064 - 0.009 mg/n3 0.01 ng/n3
xylene 0.5 - 5 ppm 100 ppn
ethyl acetate 200 ppn 400 ppn
trichloroethylene <10 ppn ?5 ppn
1,1,1 trichloroethane 25 ppn 350 ppn
arsine <0.001 ng/n3 0.2 ng/n3
-112-
-------
5.1.5.6 Industry Data '""i
1 in,
The Occupational Health Committee of the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA)
collects sampling data from member firms. We obtained detailed SIA data for sampled
measurements of xylene and glycol ethers, as well as individual monitoring results from
Signetics for various acids, solvents, dusts, and lead, but no dopant gases such as arsine or
phosphine.
Industry sampling data for xylene, involving hundreds of personal breathing zone
samples, were all substantially below the CAL/OSHA PEL of 100 ppm, although routine
monitoring in non-wafer fabrication areas disclosed at least one sample at 47ppm. Industry
data for glycol ethers, (2-butoxyethanol, 2-methoxyethanol, 2-ethoxyethanol, 2-methoxyethyl
acetate, and 2-ethoxyethyl acetate) encompassed 371 personal and area samples (279 by SI A
companies and 92 by NIOSH from the 1983 Control Technology surveys), of which 69.3%
were for 2-ethoxyethyl acetate, 16.7% for 2-ethoxyethanol, 10.2%-for:2-methoxyethyl acetate,
3.2% for 2-methoxyethanol and 0.5% for 2-butoxyethanol. Sampling-" rcults showed only 74
(20%) of samples to be of detectable concentrations; and of these,'onty 4 (5.4%), all
involving 2-ethoxyethyl acetate, were above 1 ppm. The samples above 1 ppm were for
peak concentrations, taken at periods of maximum potential exposures the SIA study
therefore assumed that on an 8-hour TWA basis, none of the fourosarnpled workers would
have received even 1 ppm exposure. The highest exposure measured was for "operator"
(work area not stated), at 18 ppm (peak exposure). This is well ^below the CAL/OSHA
PEL of 50 TWA ppm, but above the DOW Chemical Company recommendation of 5 ppm.
ti ' • >
The Signetics data included over 100 personalized area samples taken in 1985 for
various substances, predominantly sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric and -hydrochloric acids,
acetone, xylene, n-butyl acetate, lead, dust, ethylbenzene, Freon 113, and
1,1,1-trichloroethane. None of these samples were above the CAL/OSHA PEL. Some
samples were at or above 50% of the PEL, including lead (samples'included levels of 50%.
22% and 30% of the PEL), and xylene (samples included levels of *7% and 67% of the
PEL). urs _
5.1.6 Summary of Exposure Data 5
re ii.
The overall picture of hazardous exposures in the industry as shown by the data
reviewed is that relative to established PELs, workers typically receive very low or
minimal exposures. This characterization has held true, generally, fof personal and area
sampling, and for total (TWA) and peak exposures. Notable instan&s^in which exposures
have been found at or near the PEL has included some solvents, including one
NIOSH-sampled overexposure for 2-ethoxyethanol, arsenic in ion-implantation areas (NIOSH
2lŁa samples only), arsenic in diffusion-tube maintenance, EPI vacuum cleaner maintenance.
and LED device processing (CAL/OSHA 1981 study), lead (OSHA and industry data), and
beryllium (OSHA data).
However, despite the apparent absence of palpable exposure risks disclosed by
monitoring, the presence of highly hazardous materials, such as arsettic, in important
semiconductor fabrication processes must be considered. In light ofWese hazards, the
authors of the 1981 CAL/OSHA study, reviewing their own monitoring results, and Ungers
and Jones, reviewing data for ion-implantation systems from the in-edepth NIOSH Control
Technology reports (2) both voiced concern that risks of exposure remained. With regard
to silicon-device manufacturing (discrete or 1C circuits on silicon wafers), the 1981
CAL/OSHA study noted that "the potential for sporadic short duration (acute) exposures to
the range of hazardous agents and by-products during maintenance or system malfunction
-113-
-------
is an area which warrants in-depth evaluation (p. 264) (3). Ungers and Jones, noting first
that in the NIOSH CT surveys, "at no time . . . were workplace concentrations of arsenic
found to exceed a maximum value of 3.6 ug/m3," stated that (in ion-implantation systems
areas) "area samples collected at key maintenance points on the implants were high enough
to indicate a potential for more serious exposures" (p. 16) (2).
5.1.7 Occupational Illness Statistics for the Semiconductor Industry in Santa Clara County
To examine illness data for the semiconductor industry in Santa Clara County, we
examined sources: 1) Summary Statistics from "Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury
and Illness," kept by the Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) and obtained
for years 1982-84 for Santa Clara County; 2) Summary Statistics from "Doctor's First
Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness," also kept by DLSR, obtained for years 1979
and 1982-84 for Santa Clara County; and 3) data prepared by or for the Occupational
Health Committee of the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), including summaries of
the "Employer's Report" database (from the State of California for years 1977-83, and from
industry-compiled data for 1983). For discussion of how DLSR tabulates its statistics, see
the DLSR section in Section 2 of this report. A third DLSR database, compiled from
employers logs of occupational injury and illness, was not reviewed because the data are
not available by county.
Generally, the types of sources reviewed, based on reported illness for which an
occupational etiology has been recognized, tend to capture acute, well-defined problems,
such as burns, gas inhalations, and skin irritations. While important occupational illnesses,
such as cancer or any chronic or latent problem, are poorly captured by such systems,
these systems may complement environmental monitoring results, which themselves are
poorly suited to capturing episodic exposures such as chemical burns, or irregular chemical
exposures of brief duration.
Employer's Report Statistics from DLSR showed that, in 1983, the Santa Clara County
Semiconductor industry reported 182 occupationally related illnesses involving at least one
lost workday; in 1984 this figure was 176 (the 1982 data obtained did not have 4-digit
SIC). These figures represent 12% and 11% of the total non-government Employer's Reports
of occupational illness for the county in 1983 and 1984, respectively. This proportion is
somewhat greater than the proportion of SIC 3674 employment to total Santa Clara County
employment as of Fall 1983, which was about 8%. These figures reflect only illnesses
which resulted in at least one lost work day.
Breakdowns of Santa Clara County occupational disease cases by specific type and
cause were obtained from DLSR's Doctor's First Reports database for 1982-84.
Unfortunately, the data available from this database are by three-digit SIC only. Bearing
in mind the inclusion of other electronics industries in the 367 SIC (Electronic
Components), these data show that dominant illnesses were chemical burns (about 25%), eye
conditions (about 23%), skin conditions (about 23%), and systemic poisonings (about 16%).
Electronic components (SIC 367) taken as a whole was a major contributor of Doctor's
First Reports in the county. For example, in 1984, SIC 367 contributed nearly one-half of
the Doctor's First Reports for chemical burns, and about 30% of the reports for "systemic
poisoning". However, these figures are not limited to the semiconductor industry alone.
Illnesses identified by the Occupational Health System of the SIA contained slightly
different categorizations and proportions, showing (for 1983—179 cases total), dermatitis
(34.6%), repiratory effects (17.3%), conjunctivitis (14.5%), and "systemic effect" (10.1%); a
category of "other illness" comprised 17.9% of the cases. Chemical burns, which were not
-114-
-------
classified as illnesses by SIA, were the fourth most frequent type of injury or illness,
accounting for 11.4% of all work-related injuries or illnesses (1,640 total cases).
The major causes of illness tended to arise from acids and miscellaneous unspecified
chemical compounds. DLSR Doctor's First Reports data for SIC 367 for 1984, for example,
showed 200 out of 557 total illness cases to be related to acids, of which 57 were from
hydrofluoric acid. Though very few cases were related to certain substances of concern in
exposure monitoring (such as arsenic), the number of arsenic cases reported (7) are
noteworthy in light of arsenic's carcinogenic effect. (It should be noted again that these
figures are not specific to SIC 3674, however).
5.1.8 Literature
There is an emerging literature on occupational health issues in the semiconductor
industry. The first detailed assessment of semiconductor-related processes was performed
by NIOSH, involving analysis of the photovoltaic solar cell industry (4). Descriptions of
processes and industrial hygiene monitoring and control considerations can be found in the
1984 edition of Industrial Hygiene Aspects of Plant Operations. Cralley and Cralley, eds.,
volume II, Chapter 35, "LSI Semiconductor Manufacturing" (5). Volume III of the same
series (1985) contains a discussion of engineering considerations in equipment, layout, and
building design, including the issue of highly flammable or explosive materials in use in
the industry (6). In addition to the CAL/OSHA (3) and NIOSH (7) studies already cited, a
detailed review of potential hazards, health effects and opportunities for exposure in the
industry can be found in The Microelectronics Industry. Joseph LaDou, ed. (8). This study
contains no monitoring data, nor original health effects research, however, though other
research and anecdotal cases are cited.
The potential for arsenic exposure from doped semiconductor wafers has been
investigated by Ungers, Jones, Mclntyre, and McHenry, with a finding that arsenic is
emitted from doped wafers up to 4 hours after ion-implantation (9).
Ungers and Jones have reviewed data from the NIOSH in-depth Control Technology
surveys for ion-implantation areas (3); and' Ungers, Jones, and Mihlan have reviewed
similar data for radio frequency exposure in plasma etching, stripping, or cleaning of
wafers (10).
Very few epidemiological studies of semiconductor industry health effects were found.
One such study, cited in The Microelectronics Industry, by Sorahan, Waterhouse,
McKiernan, et.al., demonstrated a higher than expected incidence of melanoma among
semiconductor workers in England (11).
5.1.9 Other Observations
Despite the absence, in the thousands of personal and area sampling measurements
reviewed, of either pattern or prevalence in actual overexposures to semiconductor workers.
the hazards and processes used in the industry will continue to require assessment, for the
following reasons. First there are problems which are poorly assessed by monitoring or
illness reporting systems. Among these are the unknown long-term low-level exposures to
solvents, a particular risk for semiconductor workers due to the prevalence of solvent use,
as well as the extensive use of recirculated air in fabrication clean rooms.
-115-
-------
Second, the problem of potential catastrophic accident, caused by fire or explosion
due to explosive, combustible gases such as hydrogen or silane, which are also extensively
used, must be addressed by appropriate gas storage and handling systems, with automated
leak detection equipment.
Third, in the course of researching this report, we reviewed many anecdotal accounts
of worker anxiety and non-specific, systemic health complaints, for which no cause could
be attributed. These complaints were seen in CAL/OSHA case files, in the CAL/OSHA
study, in some of the NIOSH HHE's, in newspaper articles with worker interviews, and in
conversations with community members and occupational health professionals. Such
complaints may not be inconsistent with gas or solvent exposures, or health effects of
exposures to other toxic materials. Another possible contributing factor was also suggested
by Dr. Peter Wald, a physician at the UC San Francisco Occupational Health Clinic, who
noted that fabrication workers generally work in sterile "clean room" environments, often
wearing protective clothing while performing repetitive and tedious tasks (e.g., looking
through microscopes, transferring wafers). Even if no hazardous level of exposure is
present, such an environment may be highly stressful and aggravate other health
complaints. Or. Wald suggested an approach to the microelectronics industry involving
attention to ergonomic issues, and including epidemiologic studies of worker populations.
Finally, the highly innovative and technical character of the industry dictates that
new processes and materials will continue to make their appearance among semiconductor
firms, thereby introducing worker exposures and hazards of unknown significance. 5.1.10
5.1.10 Summary
The semiconductor industry presents a paradoxical work environment. It is an
industry which on the one hand represents, in the materials and processes it uses, and in
its dynamic innovations, a great potential source of hazardous exposures and diseases, both
known and unknown. At the same time, none of the agencies which have yet reviewed
the industry for actual exposures using conventional industrial hygiene techniques have
found evidence of substantial exposures. The recommeadations for fastidious and diligent
attention to exposure sampling, control technology and worker training by firms, as already
outlined by the existing literature, would seem to remain standard recommendations, as
would continued research by appropriate governmental agencies, such as NIOSH.
-116-
-------
REFERENCES
1. Chazkin, W., Double Exposure: Women's Health Hazards on the Job and at Home. New
York: Monthly Review Press, 1984.
2. Ungers, L.J., and Jones, J.H., "Industrial Hygiene and Control Technology Assessment
of Ion Implantation". Submitted for publication.
3. Wade, R., Williams, M., Mitchell, T., Wong, J., and Tuse, B., Semiconductor Industry
Study. Technical Document of California Department of Industrial Relations, Division
of Occupational Safety and Health, Taskforce on the Electronics Industry, 1981.
4. Industrial Hygiene Characterization of Photovoltaic Solar Cell Industry. U.S. Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare (DHHS), National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH). Technical Report Publication No. 80-112. March, 1980.
5. Cox, J.D., and Rossi, D.A., "LSI Semiconductor Manufacturing". In: Cralley, L.V., and
Cralley, L.J. (eds.) Unit Operations and Product Fabrication. New York: MacMillan,
1984. (Cralley, L.V., and Cralley, L.J. (eds.) Industrial Hygiene Aspects of Plant
Operations: vol. 2).
6. Stewart, J.H., and Elkington, K.J., "Electronics: Semiconductor Manufacturing". In:
Cralley, L.V., and Cralley, L.J. (eds.) Engineering Considerations in Equipment
Selection. Layout, and Building Design. New York: MacMillan, 1985. (Cralley, L.V.,
and Cralley, L.I. (eds.) Industrial Hygiene Aspects of Plant Operations: vol. 3.)
7. Environmental Chemistry Department, Systems and Measurements Division (Research
Triangle Institute): Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing
Industry. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 85-100. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing
Office, February 1985.
8. LaDou, J., (ed.) The Microelectronics Industry. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc.,
Jan.-Mar., 1986. (State of the Art Reviews: Occupational Medicine; vol. 1 - No. 1.)
9. Ungers, L.J., Jones, J.H., Mclntyre, A.J., and McHenry, C.R., "Release of Arsenic from
Semiconductor Wafers*. Am. Ind. Hve. Assoc. J.. 46:416-20, 1985.
10. Ungers, L.J., Jones, J.H., Mihlan, "Emission of Radio-Frequency Radiation from
Plasma-Etching Operations". Submitted for publication.
11. Sorahan, T., Waterhouse, J., McKiernan, M., et. al., "Cancer Incidence and Cancer
Mortality in a Cohort of Semiconductor Workers:. Br. J. Tnd. Med.. 42:546-550, 1985.
-117-
-------
5.2 Electronic Components. NEC (SIC 3679)
5.2.1 Introduction
Electronic components, not elsewhere classified (SIC 3679) is the third largest
industrial classification in Santa Clara County, with a total employment of 23,849. This
SIC, like other "not elsewhere classified" SIC's, does not denote a homogeneous group of
establishments, but rather encompasses a diversity of enterprises, from makers of
phonograph needles to makers of radio headphones. However, in Santa Clara County, the
most conspicuous type of business within this classification is the assembly or manufacture
of printed circuit boards. We included this SIC in the industry profiles on the basis of its
high level of employment in the county and its extensive use of a number of hazardous
materials, particularly solder flux, solder (containing lead), solvents, and electroplating
solutions and materials. In addition, this industry contributes to Santa Clara County
occupational illness statistics in proportions above what would be expected on the basis of
its employment.
5.2.2 Demographics
In sharp contrast to the other large electronics SIC's in Santa Clara County (SIC's
3573, 3662, and 3674), which are dominated by very large firms -- i.e., firms with over .
1,000 employees -- SIC 3679 owes most of its employment share to medium and small firms.
Of the 23,849 persons employed in the SIC according to the NIOSH Industrial File, 12,474
(52%) work in firms with fewer than 250 total employees, and 3,579 (15% of the total)
work in firms with fewer than 50 employees. One thousand three hundred fifty workers
(5.7% of the total) are employed in firms with less than 20 workers.
Of the 374 total Santa Clara firms in SIC 3679, 203 have fewer than 50 employees, while
only 8 have over 500 employees, and only 3 have over 1,000 employees.
5.2.3 Printed Circuit Board Fabrication
As noted, the most significant business type among Santa Clara County establishments
in SIC 3679 is printed circuit board fabrication. The manufacture of printed circuit
boards can basically be broken down into electroplating operations, in which desired circuit
patterns are plated onto sheets of epoxy-fiberglass, and assembly operations, in which
integrated circuits are soldered onto the electroplated boards. Some firms perform both
types of operations, while others specialize.
The general overall cycle of operations involves cutting the fiberglass boards to size,
laminating them with plastic (or sometimes, metal), silk-screening a circuit pattern onto the
board using an electroplate resist, electroplating the board to deposit conductive metal in
the desired pattern, drilling holes in the board to allow attachment of integrated circuits
and other electronic components, and then soldering electronic components onto the board.
Various cleaning processes are used throughout the cycle. Some operations may involve
variations or different ordering of these processes.
Because the operations in printed circuit board fabrication involve basic industrial
processes, the hazards present, and the appropriate methods for controlling them, are
similar to other industries in which these processes are used (e.g. ordinary electroplating
shops). AS these processes have been well-established in industry for many years,
processes, they have also been well characterized in the industrial hygiene literature. The
-118-
-------
predominant health risks in SIC 3679 may differ from these other industries, however, in
that certain materials and processes (e.g. cyanide, in both electroplating and electroplate
resist silk-screening) may tend to be more prevalent due to the specific product of the
industry, while others (e.g. grinding to prepare surf aces'for electroplating) may tend to be
less prevalent or absent.
5.2.4 Potential Exposures
To assess potential exposures in SIC 3679, we reviewed the two national surveys
performed by NIOSH the National Occupational Hazard Survey (1974) and the National
Occupational Exposure Survey (1985). Again, due to the heterogenous nature of this
classification, the materials and exposure potentials identified in the survey may not apply
to every type of operation within the SIC. Materials used specifically in printed-circuit
board fabrication cannot be separated from the other materials identified by the surveys
for the SIC.
5.2.4.1 National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS)
For the NOHS, NIOSH surveyed 26 firms in SIC 3679, with a total employment of
7,188. The survey identified 379 hazardous substances used in the SIC. On the basis of
the Industrial Risk Index, rating the extent and hazardousness of substances found in the
survey, SIC 3679 ranked only in the top 30%, out of 412 industries ranked. However,
using NOHS data, but applying OSHA's hazard severity weights and ranking system (OSHA
Weighted Index, or OWI), SIC 3679 ranked in the top 20% of 549 industries ranked. (For
an explanation of the IRI and OWI ranking systems, see Section 4 of this report). The
OSHA weighted index for the eighty most serious hazards in the industry (as determined
by the index) is shown in Table 5.2-1. As seen in the table, the
hazards with the highest weighted indices were mostly lead compounds (26 out of the top
40 OWI hazards), which are found in electroplating solutions and solder; solvents (e.g.
xylene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane) found in degreasing or cleaning steps in both
electroplating and assembly; and acids, found in electroplating baths.
5.2.4.2 National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES)
For the NOES, NIOSH surveyed 36 firms, with a total employment of 20,729 workers.
The survey identified a total of 416 substances, compounds, and -hazards (including
physical stresses, e.g. "finger manipulations"). The substances identified, the number and
percentage of workers exposed among those surveyed, and the number of female workers
exposed, are shown in Table 5.2-2.
It can be seen in the table that fewer than 2% of the surveyed workers were exposed
to most of the hazardous substances identified. The ten substances with the highest
percentages of the 20,729 workers surveyed potentially exposed were solder SOE (10.74%),
isopropyl alcohol (9.00%), solder flux SOE (7.14%), lubricant (constituents not identified,
4.88%), freons (3.97%), acetone (3.52%), 2-butanone (3.12%), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (3.00%),
cutting oil (constituents not identified, 2.79%), and glass cleaner (constituents not identified.
2.76%). Lead compounds were not specifically identified in this survey apart from other
compounds (e.g. solder) in which they were present. Other substances of note identified in
the survey were chromic acid (111 workers identified as exposed, or .54%), 2-ethoxyethyl
acetate (ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate, 123 workers exposed, or .59%), and silicon
dust (142 workers exposed, or .69%).
-119-
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3679 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. NEC.
Table 5.2-1
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7.188
26
1
I—1
to
o
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2037
2310
9210
1591
06-86
1591
1720
2460
2611
1430
2590
2490
5010
1591
1591
C0320
1591
2020
1591
0874
1591
1591
1591
1591
0686
0686
1591
1591
1590
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
NOHS
CODE
M0126
42685
M0125
81000
81677
84544
M2829
70870
94220
91160
81876
84546
46970
73300
77150
38580
76720
73790
52131
M0124
84473
09070
M1015
54790
84278
24130
82952
84545
A1297
M0751
M0814
M0886
M1387
M1685
42510
80252
80832
81877
83015
83062
8JGBO
DESCRIPTION
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD OXIDES
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
SULFURIC ACID
WOODS
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2O SALT UU)
LEAD SULFATE
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1-
TOLUEHE
ZINC CHLORIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
XYLENE
EFHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
OIL, CUTTING
LEAD BOROFLUORIDE .
LEAD NITRATE
BENZENE
LEAD BOROSILICATE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
LEAD TITANATES
DICHLOROETHANE. 1,2-
LEAD GERMANATE
LEAD SILICATE
LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
LEAD CHROMATE. LEAD MOLYBDATE, LEAD SULFATE COMPLEX
LEAD CHROMATE, MOLYBDATED
LEAD HYDROXIDE
LEAD BORATE
LEAD ARSENATE
LEAD CARBONATE
LEAD CHLOROSILICATE COMPLEX
LEAD PHOSPHITE
LEAD FLUORIDE
LEAD SULFATE. TRIBASIC
LEAD ZIRCOMATE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.211
1.200
1.175
1.148
1.148
1.148
810
1.056
655
617
615
615
864
855
596
825
803
796
553
550
547
545
516
719
503
497
476
472
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.168
.166
,163
.159
.159
.159
.112
.146
.091
.085
.085
.085
.120
.118
.082
.114
.111
.110
.076
.076
.076
.075
.071
.100
.069
.069
.066
.065
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
1.684
1.669
1.634
1.597
1.597
1.597
1.126
1.028
.911
.858
.855
.855
.841
.832
.829
.803
.781
.775
.769
.765
.760
.758
.717
.700
.699
.691
.662
.656
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
-------
~ 5.2
(2)
C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
79 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTfc* I ION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY HEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—-NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7,188
26
1
t-
to
L^
r^
I
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2432
2432
2432
1280
9050
5010
1660
0527
1060
9090
2000
I860
0374
1290
2532
1591
1010
1460
1941
0170
9030
1060
1913
0290
0570
0760
0494
2060
1842
2040
2229
2240
NOHS
CODE
83081
83299
83436
83915
84433
84439
84743
M0877
73253
82157
81945
84055
52138
45930
80243
31500
17366
M0600
50742
80517
3364.0
82880
83453
25145
38550
51090
05250
71055
M0238
32385
90320
17490
20380
15630
57740
50495
55460
111463
niS04
DESCRIPTION
LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE
LEAD MOLYfrOATE
LEAD PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC
LEAD PHOSPHATE. TRIBASIC
LEAD SULFIDE
LEAD CHLORIDE
LEAD SILICOCHROMATE
STANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
STANNOUS OXIDE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
OIL, LUBE
METHANOL
CARBON
ETHYL ALCOHOL
GRAPHITE
PARAFFIN
NITRIC ACID
SODIUM BORATE
FORMALDEHYDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
lE/,0 NAPHTHENATE
DIOXANE, 1,4-
HYDF.OGEN FLUORIDE
NITROPROPANE, 2-
AMnOHIA
TALC
ALCOHOL
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
ASPHALT
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CRESOL
CADMIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
NICKEL OXIDES
PHEHOL
IRON OXIDE. RED
SILVER POWDER
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
616
612
610
421
587
409
569
382
1,260
527
359
322
436
302
427
289
283
280
275
391
390
687
264
252
249
247
215
223
222
216
280
268
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.085
.085
.084
.058
.081
.056
.079
.053
.175
.073
.049
.044
.060
.042
.059
.040
.039
.038
.038
.054
.054
.123
.036
.035
.034
.034
.032
.031
.030
.030
.038
.037
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
03
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.599
.595
.594
.585
.571
.569
.554
.531
.525
.513
.499
.447
.424
.420
.415
.402
.393
.389
.382
.380
.379
.370
.367
.350
.346
.343
.326
.310
.308
.300
.272
.260
379 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3679
OTHER TOTALS:
72,097
9.834
66.697
-------
Table 5.2-2
NIOSH National Occupational Exposure
Survey (NOES) as of January 17, 1986, for
SIC 3679, Electronic Components
Not Elsewhere Classified
to
fj
I
NUMBER OF PLANTS SURVE.YED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ON PAYROLL
SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL
9 20 7 36 389 4311 16029 20729
-------
P?OIC
«• -10
"ri E'S f.~tf i P i TON" " Y v., j i.7 ^L E"
OCSCRIPMON •'..ML
« » *
xnoob
x«xxx
xVoio
5 1C
"Yi"
4
I-I
.?,.*?..
.Ob
.00
,00
,"o"i)"
,00
• 4
• *
.---..
**
•\b~
%
r n
DESCRIPTION
OESCH1PUOU
A VM LABILE:
AVAILABLE
* 4 4
VUll
l
.05
.(•I
• •• r.o
DESCRIPTION
PESCRIPTION
AVAILABLE
I 44
I 4 *
77
,37
xno-}7
XoU'5
.uo
.1-0
V» «'
444
**•
*»*v
i.'J DESCRIPTION
MO PLSC'MPIION
rVAlUPLE
> 4 •
I 4*
I
6
...«t.
/.VAILA.HE
"A'VA'ILA'HLE
AVAILABLE
* 4 *
444'
XO(HI
.'U
.00
,i»n
* * *
»*•
:.0
\0
* ••
* * •
X0043
I
.C5
..P.I.
11
2
.00
.00
xnouu
Xn«62
ii'iOl"
II
'?"*'
..P.6.
.!*•
."I
II
a
2
,«P
.'•ib'
,0"
4*4
"i 4
4 4
'.0
? n
AVAIL/. BLE
RESCRIPT IOM
i 4 *
i 4 4
..o
AVAILABLE
* 4 *
• • 4
» * 'iO
AVAILABLE
44*
« 4 4
^
XP023
"xob26
It.
o
,6i)
»« '.0 PESCRIPTION AVAILABLE »44
4* -.0 DESCRIPTION AVAIL/.PLE 44*
»• 'JO INSCRIPTION
444
4 4 *
,<*0
.f-0
PESCRIPTIOH
> 4 4
> 4 4
AVAILABLE
AVAILABLE
"AVAlO.flLC"
AVAJLAMLE
X«OI3
7
17
1552
3 'i
.03
..??.
,00
,1.0
44^70
44 ..0 DESCRIPTION
* 4 4
« 4 4
7 no
. .
ViT
x-1014
X006I
278
25
34
,12
21)3
4
.00
.00"
.00
•4« to DESCRIPTION
V;YTO"DESCRIPTI;JN-
• «• -10 DESCRIPTION AVAILABLE
444
* 4 4
I 4 4
I 4*
X0017
3C
35
.15
17
. "0
>0
••• JO O
ABUA3IVE
AVAILABLE •••
SHOT
ii.
JIOOI
J1002
JO 300
58.
4
10
.63
.??.
.02
20
3
.00
.00
.uo
.00
,\flSORSE"T, LIQUID
T. SOLID
JI006
BO 1 op
01568
15
(17
l|6
..».
.56
.,05.
2rt
95
TFT
-" ?
V«o
-::-
ACCElERATOH
"ACEtiC"AClb"
ACF.MC »CIO
"•.rF."* ir"«"t(h",
ETHYL ESTfu
-------
., c_. _
: nu[_y
c'»nt i •:
03897
JI072
JI075
JI071
BOQ|6
Jill Ib
2i'2b5
35250
0^270
ftiM5«
J<»399
9?fl jo
f. 7 n 3 5
P 2 0 0 3
0,IJ|0
3*155
P?OCl
M I-V7-J5
fo jn]c2
"•" jjjjj;
•I"*!
MII 127
80036
J0262
904PO
BOQ12
X0022
XOQ7I
I 0 | 0 b
< OQ6 3
J'H90
7/9
1 16
31
'163
9
3
52
15
1
no
H
3
35
1
i
I?i7
II
1"
q
H
u
...17.
\f
1
55
67
55
35
P
_!*....
13
-HKM3
.56
1 OC
J5
2.23
i) i
.17
."1
.25
*'!'
.0-4
.17
.'"•I
.CI
i . n
6*n!
107
"og
.05
0?
.29
*C3
!?7
.32
1,15
.27
.17
..il
.91
.08
.20
.06
5-4?
'19
Ufr
1
t>
a
'10
3
16
3
!•»
1
51
u
26
1
01
79U
1
5
<(
II
2
4
15
33
63
'22
7
2
5
2
b
2
'.'•ft'
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.UO
.00
;ili!
^"°
^00
"on
.00
,uO
/"°
0 0
i) 0
.00
.(•0
,,,o
00
•*lo«
.00
.00
.00
.00
'.00
.00
.-°°
' H\ZA r' »ESC»IPT i'jfj" '
ACT1V»TOK
MOOITIVE. I-EC
AP'IESIVE, AWl'lAL-RL'-'E
.lOMESiVE. SYr.f'iETIC-lJESl::
,.IR FRESHEl.ER
;.L.nALU.'I«UM-Mp .....Kf-Qw.,
;.LUMIMJ'- OXIDE
/.»»'OMJM BIFLUl'WIPE
'.••MO'.'rjM CHLORIDE
A" 'O.MliM 3ULFATE
A''TI'.SIEZE CO^PO'.i'-lL*
/.':TlFn/,''ING ARE'.'T
.\fiT lOXJO-^K'T
A'lTISEPTlC
A5DESTjsSP°IJT3
AM, COLO-MF uNKH3h*j
hE:iZE'iŁS"L'LFOI»IC .'.CIO, P-l (P-(Pi'»E'MVL t •lI'!n)PHE'i4VL)470)-,
flLEACHI'-C AGENTS
nnjLER rtATER TRE.-.T MEMT CHE"IC/.L
BOF.A'.'E
BTR-iTE ( i-) { TETR..FL"ORO-» LEAPC?*)
(loft ;TE( I.)* fET iJ.,FLUURO-t ^f?i(2+)
GIRAX
nor ic ACID
nn/>L CLEANER
BfJASS, CU, Zfi, P'j r.ROUP ('IOHS-I ONLY)
nwT
flK'T ..LUMif.'UM
B^T NATURAL GAS
OPT STAINLESS STEEL
OUT STEEL
O'lFFING COliPOUMO"
OUTANOL
-------
'• .IKHTPS
'.„..- "VtAf -% X.:cr')'.LFr
taoie :>.Ł-« IHJ: nut a
1 1 1*0
.2 ?/>«*.
XA6Q7
17 Jt>7
8106°
l57t«S
17595
P?nl1
57
I'l
1
0
31
M
1*
5
1
«•
2 ** '
.'Ji
.15
!o2
."1
7? 7<
."3
01
* .wO
.WO
,00
;!I5
.CO
.on
,uO
> ',/! 1)
>!
BUTYL ACE CUE
C.I. I3P2P-1CID RED f
C.'.irBIDE
C.\i{''OU PLACK
C.'pnn1.1 DIOXIDE
CM'RfViic ACID ••o'i'osiii'Tiiv SALT"
C'.KBO'JJC ACID, CALCJ"11 StLT fltl) ,
C;.T&L»ST
CAT'lijI'i lUV t'J3"E"
CAUSTIC CLEriE»<
J«»37?
1
n .00 CE it'IT, ^cc
.on CHE'-IC/.L, f
i .01 I .ob c»*l;6»"fc .«c"io (n'ifiRo"). f»is;ff>iu-' svif
« 02 ^A\°...A^n.'!!c_.r-OOJ.!«2C^
6B900
1
M
KJ
Ul
1
J«337
J*»I57
Jft23«
JOI9A
J0026
|9769
J|>2:)I
2tQ64
•0610
9JM75
20155
02130
BI735
40020
21660
II .f'5
2* .H
o . 'Ji
126 .h|
19 .21
239 ».I5
f.2 .Hfi
13 .06
**\ '"it
M .0?
"39 2.1^
3AI 1."^
0
00
00
00
0»
00
00
oo
00
00
00
00
[HCO UU
CLEA'.'FP
CUE:. 'EF;
CLEi;iEP
CLE/AEP
CLE.«!-
i
PI
•I *
X,
N(
».!!'I(3HSl-flE'20XATMIOL-3-YLinENE)aiS(6.R«OMO-, S,
LP.-JF UNK)l6H?
»NO:JE
J FOi-OER
233 1.17Vi.»0
jo2«3 I .01 '.00 DELI'^INC AGElJf
eoboij" « !o2 ".'"''""oEbi'inYZt'rt
\r
TUT
-------
C'IDE
l"ll
J02I5
J'Jl?
JIOI»
P071C
v>n]QO
•4 P?00^
ft"02'»
TI651
7«o|n
31500
3?305
764 45
7379^
91J95
33.J'45
J«362
j5?23
Ł\l*
J«3I«
JI02I
, jut 15
JM13
n JOII«
JI022
I......JI023..
JW
3JB95
7 1 60S
•4 1 | Jo
3'i'«55
rt-m:.vi-
l"
li
t
Q
30
3
11
1??
II
25
o5
1
57
Irt
JO
2133
1
'fo
37?
6
b
u
.02.3... .
7
73
•v-^krw-
.07
.15
.91
]o.'4
.15
.Ji
[l7
' -it
.?'!
"12
.59
.01
!r»._.
.15
JO...
!02
J'l
22...
.0.1
.'M
7. 11
.03
.05...
'.'^
.•»!
....A. ?.?...
."3
:55
^'«^3
q
1
Mi 3
2
5
29
2
27
2b
17
ol
25
27
1
M43
3
fl
1635
8
2
137
IO&7
5
51
J
561
I
69
" - ni —
73
:°R!<|IJOS
.00
,00
.00
'oo._
.1)0
fno
.00
.no
.00
.OJ
.oft
.00
'.6(T
.00
IoO
.00
.00
J.DO
.00
.00
•.c.c
.••0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
...c
.HO
.f-0
.•'0
".ob"
'.oo
!iAZAiESCii"iPTl')'4
DESE'.'SITjZJ'jG AGE' T
iiETfRCE'.t
jFVTLOPEU
I-EVELOPER REPLE'HSHER
OICHLORP*'ETH,\MŁ
t
FLUX, SOLDER I f-iG S0Ł
FLUX, SOLDERING S'lT
FLUX, Ti»l'E
FURA1;, TETRAHYDRO
FURNITURE POLISH
-------
Table 5.2-2 (6): NOES"
,. "... »'.**«....
6IHS*
97470
i, Jfl|b6
JAI7I
P201-5
J592S
3*OtoO
1*^1
JH?S?
P rt |> 2 1*
ft 00 | t
9752S
JI092
^ JMS9
M J0|67
i 92760
JM5JJ
jo |?5
9255"
J03M
., 40200
Q0030
33)6Q
MOI30
,i HIQ63
., TI768
x3nl7
J*I65
SM*
'*
n
(Co
32
35 i
22
3'.'.
|C5
7b
97
37"
2
/i
13
3
37
7
35
90
•42
2
136
1
1-
5
7
13
1965
23
187
13
^':7i.
."3
.02
1.5 J
P. 92
.11
.Jo
."3
-79
!?o
.37
1 1" II
•JJ
.CO
.'H
."1
J7
.20
.30
.01
.06
.01
.02
.03
9.00
.11
.90
.06
1\R
an
a
119
I1*
'l«
6
241
20
53
109
51
5
25
2C1
1
9
2
131
9
20
. **"
.Oft
'"••n
"oS
O'l
->°
.UU
.00
on
.OP
' 0"
.00
' (HI
.00
>0
,uO
."0
.00
.00
;»II
..-0
.00
,«.o
.00
.00
.00
,00
.no
,0tf
.00
.00
.60
>0
GLASS CI.EAIIEK "....
GLASS, Si Lit A
GI E/.SE
G'J i i«b~i re co-.MlfiWo
GUf'S
M-.'vrE'ER3T"M*''IPULAT1":ri
I'FLIU"
MYf.whciiLnPic ACID
tllL'ftOCcl,' FLL'MHIoE.
HVI.P'JGEN PtrtOxib'I'
T'P/.CT dUIJE
IlrOIC'TOR
1'H'IhITdR
II K, COPY I"G
TJK| '-IET.-.L MARKING
I'K, PRll.TI-it
I'-K, ST. \rPI.VG
I;:K, STEf-CR
p'Stcf ic'in"Ł
INSULATION
I'lSULATIOH, ELECTRIC/,!.
IODIC ^CIO (HI03)» PflT,-.SSIU'« SaLT
!2oi"cMLOPIDE JFE^LS)
IRON OKI ft" (FE'O)
1PQN OXIrE (FE203)
IS'JPRQPVL ALCOHOLl
KiESELG'JHR
LACQUER
LACQUER ^MlMfTE"ft •
L/irfirif, CPVPOUMO
-------
1
II. .-
n ...
11
u
••
w
,/„ . i
CnOE
jnjlfl
P20l»9
p«a|B
9257(.
JoJJj
e"3nl
R 1 2 7 '4
8MM
«s!Jo
375IP
j"i?J
9?MO
••.1347
5«"o
5 n a
75
i.>n
45
1
2
55
12
31
f.
11
22
2....
1
62
3
69....
1
52
I
70
95
a
57*
i
3-S
I IS
120
l
. I.: .i.
. •'' •'
.15
1.29
.3t>
4.A6
.59
.01
0?
.*>!
.01
i^c
.15
.02
.3?
.•^
. .0.1....
.11
*30
I?l....
.<>2
".25
'!P.I..__
.3'4
.«.*....
.02
?.7=»
.(*!
.?.?.„.
,->7
.01
rc •:.». t i '
.-.'ORKctS «'f
1
(I .
552
101
1
1
1
*l
1
3
20
56
3
1
22
27
1
1
22
1
40
2
73
9
26
24
: ;_ -. i_ »
JRKffiS
i-IM?
.00
...,-'!?..
,oc
• ;;j
.00
.00
.«"'
.00
'!!°
.no
...J>.?..
.«">
>o
...,'.".9..
..J.I?..
. >' 0
dO
.00
.00
...,.?»-.
%o
.00
'.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
T4ble 5,2-2 (7_): NOES
1 \ZA.»D CŁSCPrpfl3"
LAVoi'T FLUID
LEC i TMI *s
LIFTING- POSTURES
LICHT/GLA*Ł LEVEL
LO'IG *AVŁ PADIP FFEOUEICV
LI'B-'IC.AM
.'"4
i.'icKEL CAMBONATE
»;ICKŁL CHLORIDE
"TC*EL SULFA'lATE
MC^EL SULFATE
IMTRJC ACID SILVEHCIO sar
f.!n!oc?IniŁYH*'lni" ?'S'^""
MTHOCCN (CRYOGE''Ic LIQUID)
IIYL'OU (HOMS-1 6""LV)
UCT/vOECEr.OIC AGIO JZ-), ZINC S
-------
Table
5-M«3
5? l-«1
J-M55
e«ij!
JoSso
JlOh**
J«I70
J0390
P2000
, HM75
69330
6MS3
1 t 3ou
^ , .5*5.29
* .. 70795
J037S
J0295
8*117
ii P fl 0 3 3
Mft522
» J02AO .
9?700
9?720
„ 0n 1 06
AI3S'I
612/5
80197
3
22
65
S
7
1"
'1
2
11....
30
1
0
u
1033
13
2
4
'•
1
..22.. .
2
(i
23
6....
23
IS
273
65
12
• OS
11
I p Q
5 ft n
2
.•I
.3!
.02
03
.09
'o's
.is
"•V
a;^6
.... !«.«
.11
."7
.01
.1.1
.01
.02
.'I
.U
.11
0,,
.07
1.32
.. .20
.11
.06
.5.
."6
.01
.53
1 . '•• ^
!oi
71
IP.
2
7
a
1
1
5
1
SUB
23
1
4
Jl
I
1
'1
10
5
3
125
2P
17
46
96
4
26
10
1
.t'O
. tiO
f 1 (1
. U 0
'!,'?
.on
.I'O
.00
.0"
,oO
.00
.MO
.(•0
'.00
.00
A U
u 0
.00
.00
.0»
.00
,.q?_.
'"'!
.1'"
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
>0
.uo
.00
OIL, »'.e.c.
nit. Pt:iŁTPnTIflG
OIL* OUErJC»«I,;G
OIL, I^PPI-'G
P-CKI'-'G CO'^PhufJO
p- DO PIG Cii"PO-j;jn
"Pi. IKT THIH'.E'R
PAI''T, 'CS'YLIC
PMf.'T., .'LKYi>
PMf T. E"OXY
PALLADIUM CHLORIDE
P/IUFFI" "AXES AND HYprMCAROtV- -lAXtS
P.'SSIVE.Pu5TURE3
PEROXYDISl'LFl'RIC ACID ( ( (H'.i)3(0)2)2(12) , Ot •.^'OKIU" S..L1
pEKiXYbisi'LFL'Vic ACii>i((no")S(^)2)2"C)?i, D'isiM"i> S"/.LT
PETMOLE"' liAPHTHA
^DSpi!^11"1'48
PHOSPHihlC ACID. 3001"'' S.'.Lf
PHjSPHCIPIC iCID
PKlSPH.lKflC '.do! TRISCOIl'1' S»LT
PMriTj Pf;SlSI
^HCTDC-R^Pf'IC CHEMICtL, 'EC
p"S!ocS5ph!c KSEi?S!iB
PIPE JUI.M SEALER
PL,.SMC3
PLACING sdLilYl'oil
POLISH
* POLYCHL6R~lffATED"6YPWEK'YLS
POLYESTER HESINS
POLYETHEK PfSlN
POLYMERS, ORGANIC'
POL YURE THANE RE3IN (
-------
Table 5.2-2 (9): NOES
HAZA-iO TOT'L
C'lOE " .jOKKE»«3
bidO" ? ,'M .»° POTASSIU"
Anobi " 2 '<>! I .'"» POT/SSiii*1"r'lCHI'O^i TE~(VO
60'Kip 4* 32 56 ^Jl!) PQTtSSIU" tiYDHC-XI^C
"m'bjfi1 .•»! """ .''"i' ff'TuSSlUI lUt'IDt
bfl '."0 -PC, TASSIMH PEKM.yJt
Mil" si "25 27 "" '.V««""PnffI'NC'cO^POijYiP'
26 !l3 I"
12 .06 7
x526j 5y> f25 3 .00 pnnnucTS OF coi'-HJ-'HOn-ALCOHOLS .-.no SHJMT CHAIN
6?525 15 [i>7 !5 ^oO P(
I ? l.'lO .00 RpSi;j. PDLYPROPYLE Jf
JOJ»|A ?? ,2-{ 25 ,00 RfSIfJ, STYRE.-IE
JI'O'JH ]"«" .V7~ ."o6""Ruuiit:"R",""A"cf "&"'* ."(i6""SaN"6"rNG"DIS"K
I 01 I .00 SCRATCH REltOVEH
TT« Ttao ?Ti T^o SEALANT
P0652 2f' 10 6 ^oO SEGMENTAL "IpKATinf;
X'OOO'1 10 *05 ". 60"""sH"A"LE"i"EX"PA"l"l|JlEDV"4C"""""'""'
P?00« 80 39 21 '^00 SHqyLpER-T.RANSPORtS
VJ5S6 M3 '.i\ 2 ~.6b~"~3ii.~AME, TRICHLCRf)-"
• 7S25 21 .10 1? '.00 SILICON CARBIDE
"^ ^775 Tl .TO SILICON, DUST
MIOC2 •» .94 1 '.i'« SILICOr!E..RESI/4
•"* Rii'is" \~n~~ 05 '• ".ob" SIL'VCH CYAlMOt "
DIllJ !• .WJ f ».w —
bbTbb M7 .21 8 .°0 S('AP _ --.-_-^. , • • • •• 1 ' J - ' J J
.i;----.-Mtbss.":"""";"r^""""".'>2""V"" i-v.""""Lii"j"''"^.-^ ^—*fi-— --- - •—•----—->-—^—•--• - -
-------
i • tp ,7
„ Ml 994
J0250
JOI7I
J"||9
J-II7
JIO 12
,, J"I69
•."71*
17/175
Mil?
71- IIP
70670
I 11230
Ł" "50700
i., 929'lrt
80151
81716
;, 6"710
i. 71100
xiooo
n M095
„ U6970
92950
po«io
92960
n ..^66(2
B0029
?•••> t i
•* • »
"7
7
1
o
1
1
6
51
«!•
1
t
15
117
1
1
|
.°l
.12
.0.1
.17
.01
.01
.70
.jo
.'•1
"HZ
,09
I 01
.12
.77
."1
.08
1^00
.11
.01
06
.01
.21
.01
.'•1
rfhRKi-IS
2
2""
?)5
1617
loo
301
1.
26
3*
1
81
1
1
2
51
15
1
1
1
55
an
II
112
21
27
2
1
6
a
• - . • v.*_ .
. n|;Kt f>3
%6
' UO
.00
.00
.110
.00
.till
.(•0
!i'«
.«'"
.on
!«o
.0"
.(•0
.10
>«l
;..n
."0
.on
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.no
.00
.00
V00 .
.00
...0
.00
'.00
.00
SODIUM COP PEP cvANiof :
SDUIU" CV«f|It-E
50- ill*- ri.ii(«illnE
,50,. It'" MY'«KOXlnE
30; fi'*i SULFItE"
S"LOEB, UEc
SOLi'ER. f.OE
finl.VE**!, ^Liiu'Ri'iJATEn"
SOLVENT. HEC
SI-l'CH fiOiiS-l ONLY)
a^tEL ("'-l**3"il ^"''LY)
S * ;•' 1 P P I IJC C lV«TOi INO
STMPPlNp SOLUTIOH
S"LF;."IC ^CI^
3'ILF'JRIC .'CIO COPPER(2») S'.LT (lj»)
SULFU'JiC AClf'» lrtD«.(2») V/.LT (iiH
1/>'lTARIC *CIt'» M3HOPf)t A5SIIJ" . W(jNl)SH01Uvi SALT
I E t R A C I !L O^Ott if V L ŁfmtJ'ri.
Tlii.'FUiES
f'LL'E'lE
TOLUOL
TO:JŁR
fRICilLOiioYt^ANE
Ti'.IS"M"
HATERLE3S HAND CLtAfltn
• 1 f • -« .r_ . (V|. V )
-------
Table 5.2-2 (11): NOES __ a-'-iLh._t!E._ELlul5._fi.iiil5J.LIŁQ ___
f ' ............... "" .......... " ....... ................... " ........ " ........ "S^LL ' ^"Euii.i^" ' LA4GE ..... TOTAL"
. src nbTT cicrT'tQNic f.P"Po-E:."s. ' EC _____ 2 _ 12 _ Z _ ii.
r , HAZARD TOT»L * TOT, a FE--I.-.I.E x
CODE ,,6^KŁH5 ••T»«'KEf>S .'OHKLHS ••JOKKfPs ' HiZ-dfO ntSC« I°f I lU.
JOI.i5 50 .!P
.,__. 77I9Q •> !oi 'j"0 Z"'C
77^^rt I .01 I .f-O ZINC 3ULFJTE
f i, ....7.71.15. j.i. .p.5 jL9?...-.ZL1jL.z.!MCr."f-.y.N.?.'l-l):1'J.
14.
ll
I
•^ ::-
U)
K).
I II
-------
5.2.5 Actual Exposures
To assess actual monitored exposure levels in SIC 3679, we reviewed three sources,
federal OSHA inspection data, NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations and CAL/OSHA
inspection files from Santa Clara County inspections.
5.2.5.1 Federal OSHA Inspection Data, 1979-1982
In the four years (1979-82) for which data were available, OSHA conducted 90
inspections in SIC 3679, during which 581 exposure samples were taken, involving 87
substances. Altogether, 17 of the samples taken (2.9%), involving 10 substances, were above
the PEL. However, in reviewing the OSHA data, it is important to note also those
substances with monitored exposures at a significant proportion of the PEL, even if no
measurement was actually above the PEL. Of substances contained in the OSHA data,
twelve had exposures at or above 50% of the PEL. These substances, along with pertinent
OSHA data, are shown in Table 5.2-3.
Based on the 1979-82 OSHA inspection results for substances of all hazard weights
(OSHA hazard weights l,3,7,or 10), the IBER ranking system ranks SIC 3679 276th out of
475 industries ranked. If only exposure data for substances with more severe hazard
weights (7 or 10) are used to rank industries, SIC 3679 receives an IBER ranking of 296
out of 475 industries ranked. (For an explanation of the IBER system, see Section 4 of this
report.) Thus, relative to other major federally inspected industries, SIC 3679 did not have
especially severe actual exposures. It should nonetheless be noted that three quite toxic
substances for which high exposures were found, lead arsenate, lead carbonate, and
trichloroethylene, were also identified in NOHS or NOES as having potential exposures to
comparatively high numbers of workers in this SIC. Other important hazards identified in
the NOHS and NOES, however, such as chromic acid and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, did not
have any sampled exposure above 50% of the OSHA PEL.
5.2.5.2 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data
To determine substances sampled and exposure levels actually found in Santa Clara
County firms in SIC 3679, we reviewed CAL/OSHA inspection records for eleven Santa
Clara County firms in the SIC, encompassing a total of fifteen inspections. In the fifteen
inspections reviewed, twenty substances were encountered; the substances and monitoring
results are shown in Table 5.2-4. In addition to the substances shown in the table, some
inspection summaries contained company information on the constituents of electroplating
solutions, solder masks, and other materials used, which were not monitored. Constituents
named in individual summaries included lead fluoroborate, copper, copper sulfate, stannous
tin, tin-nickel alloy, hydrogen cyanide, gold cyanide, silver cyanide, I-nitropropane,
2-nitropropane, and dichloromethane (in various plating solutions); epoxy resins, glycol
ethers, 4,4-diaminodiphenylmethane, and dimethylformamide (in solder masks); and
diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate (in plating resists); as well as various substances
(e.g. sulfuric and hydrochloric acids) already listed in Table 5.2-4.
As shown in Table 5.2-4, no overexposures were detected in any of the fifteen
CAL/OSHA inspections reviewed. Various citations were issued in these inspections,
however, including citations for violations of the lead standard (GISO 5216, four companies
cited) and corrosive liquids standard (GISO 5162, four companies cited), and for failure to
use hand protection with methylene chloride (two companies cited under two different
standards).
-133-
-------
Table 5.2-3
Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3679:
Substances with Sampled Exposures
at or above 501 of the OSHA PEL
1
H-1
UJ
1
Substance
Cyclohexanone
Isopropyl Alcohol
Lead Arsenate
Lead Carbonate Basic
Manganese
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl ene Chloride
Mercury
Nuisance Oust
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
Num of
Insps
1
4
20
21
2
10
6
2
6
2
1
5
Num of
Samples
5
7
59
65
12
19
10
7
21
5
4
9
Mean
Proptn
of PEL
0.38
0.33
0;07
0.02
0.36
0.07
0.16
0.56
0.44
0.40
1.0ft
0.25
Max
Proptn
of PEL
0.88
1.25
2.06
0.61
2.65
0.80
0.51
1.60
6.91
1.72
1.57
0.83
Num Insp
w/ some
snp > PEL
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
I
1
1
1
0
Num Insp
w/ mean
> PEL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
Num
samps
over
PEL
0
3
1
0
2
0
0
2
3
1
2
0
Source: OSHA MIS 1979-82.
-------
Table 5.2-4
CAL/OSHA Inspection Data:
Substances Encountered and Exposure Monitoring Results 1n
SIC 3679-F1fteen Inspections (1978-84).
Substance
No. Insp.
in which
Sampled
Range of
Monitored Exposure
Acetone
Ammonia
Asbestos
Butyl Cellosolve
Cellosolve Acetate
Copper Chloride
Corrosives
Ethyleneimine
Fluorides
Formaldehyde
Hydrochloric Acid (ri
Hydrochloric Acid (ta
Lead
Methylene Chloride
Nickel
Nitric Acid
Sodium Hydroxide
Sulfuric Acid
To!uene
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
Current
CAL/O.SHA PFL
J
?
2
I
1
1
?.
1
2
1
se) 1
k) 1
5
2
2
1
1
?.
1
1
NMa
<. 02-10. 43 mg/m™
O.ni fibers/cc
-------
5.2.5.3 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's)
NIOSH has to date performed only two HHE's of firms in SIC 3679, one of
Sundstrand Data Control in Redmond, Washington (1980), and one of Syntrex Corporation
in Eatontown, New Jersey (1981). We reviewed both HHE's for this report, as well as one
additional HHE of Western Electric Company in Dublin, California (1973), for which no
SIC was specified, but which concerned "printed wiring board processing". Only the
Western Electric and Syntrex HHE's are considered here: the Sundstrand HHE was
restricted to radio frequency exposure during injection molding of heat sensors on airplane
wings, and no hazard was found.
Both the General Electric and Syntrex HHE's involved circuit board processing and
included both environmental and medical evaluations. The General Electric HHE
concerned solvent use in five operations, including testing, lacquer application, mass solder
machine operations, and mass solder machine cleaning. Personal breathing zone samples for
three substances — n-butyl acetate, toluene, and trichloroethylene — were taken for workers
involved in each of the five operations. Exposures to n-butyl acetate and toluene were
well below both the 1973 federal standards, and the current CAL/OSHA PEL'S. However,
the mean exposures to trichlorethylene for workers in all five operations sampled were
above the current CAL/OSHA PEL of 25 parts per million (ppm); and several exposures
were measured at two or three times the current CAL/OSHA PEL (though all but one
measurement were below the OSHA PEL in effect at the time).
Medical interviews of 24 workers disclosed that a high proportion had experienced
symptoms consistent with those found in solvent intoxication, including nausea, headache,
and dizziness. On the basis of the exposure data and medical evaluations, NIOSH
determined that trichloroethylene was having a toxic effect on workers at the. plant at the
time of the evaluation.
Though the year of the General Electric HHE (1973) casts doubt on its present
relevance, the problem of solvents in printed circuit board manufacture was also
encountered in the Syntrex HHE (1981). In this HHE, exposures were evaluated for
solvents used in vapor degreasing operations, following.automated or hand soldering of
printed circuit boards. Monitoring results for the three solvents -- isopropanol,
1,1,1-trichloroethane, and trichlorotrifluoroethane — were all well below the current
CAL/OSHA PEL'S. However, medical interviews with nine employees who worked in the
degreasing area found that six had symptoms consistent with solvent exposure, including
headache, burning eyes, lightheadedness, and upset stomach. Workers with the highest
exposure experienced the greatest severity of symptoms. NIOSH also noted that skin
absorption is an important route of solvent exposure, and that proper gloves were not
always available or used.
Though these two HHE's merely represent anecdotal reports of solvent exposure in
printed circuit board manufacture, and may not be generally applicable to other
establishments, they are instructive in identifying solvent exposure as a potential problem
to monitor in this industry. They also illustrate how solvents can cause toxic effects even
when monitored air levels of solvent exposure are well within established exposure limits.
Indeed, the General Electric exposures to trichloroethylene were entirely acceptable in
terms of the PEL in effect thirteen years ago.
5.2.6. Occupational Illness Statistics
To evaluate the level of occupational illness in SIC 3679, we reviewed (in addition to
-136-
-------
the anecdotal reports from NIOSH HHE's noted above) California Division of Labor
Statistics and Research data from Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness
for 1983 and 1984. These data encompassed the total number of Employer's Reports for
"disabling" illnesses (i.e., involving at least one lost workday) in Santa Clara County in
1982 and 1983. Data from the Doctor's First Report database were not reviewed because
they are available only by three-digit SICs; the existence of a much larger Santa Clara
County industry —SIC 3674, Semiconductor Manufacture — within SIC 367 makes it
impossible to characterize SIC 3679 illness from these data.
In 1983, there were 72 Santa Clara County Employer's Reports of "disabling" (lost
work day) work illnesses in SIC 3679; in 1984, this total was 110. These totals represent
4.8% and 6.9% of the total (non-government) disabling work illnesses reported for the
County in 1983 and 1984, respectively. Both percentages are somewhat higher than the
proportion of Santa Clara County employment in SIC 3679 as of 1983, which was 3.7%.
(Employment figures are from the NIOSH Industrial File, which excludes government
agencies; employment figures specific to 1983 and 1984 were not available.)
If we compare the proportion of reported disabling work illnesses reported for SIC
3679 for each year (out of the total number of such illnesses in the county) to the
proportion of Santa Clara County employment in SIC 3679 (out of total employment for
the county), we find that, in 1983, the proportion of work illness reported was 1.3 times
greater than the proportion of employment; and in 1984, it was 1.8 times greater. These
figures contrast with those for SIC Major Group 36 (electric and electronic equipment)
taken as a whole. In 1983, there were 300 disabling work illnesses reported for SIC Major
Group 36, or 19.8% of all non-government reports; in 1984, there were 366 disabling work
illnesses reported, or 22.9% of the non-government total. These percentages are much closer
(1.1 and 1.2 times greater, respectively) to the percentage of total non-government
employment in SIC Major Group 36 in Santa Clara County: according to the NIOSH
Industrial File, the percentage of Santa Clara County workers in SIC Major Group 36 is
18.4% (117,340 workers out of a total of 638,000).
If we convert reported disabling work illnesses and employment totals into rates (of
reported disabling work illness per 100 workers), the contrast between SIC 3679 and other
industry groups is perhaps clearer. The number of reported disabling work illnesses per
100 workers in the NIOSH Industrial File for SIC 3679 was 0.30 for 1983 and 0.46 for
1984. The rates were higher than those for SIC Major Group 36 taken as a whole, and
those for all manufacturing SICs taken as a whole. In fact, the 1984 rate for SIC 3679
was one and one half times greater than that for major Group 36 (0.31 illnesses per 100
workers) and nearly twice that for all manufacturing industries (0.24 per 100 workers). In
addition, the rate for SIC 3679 increased substantially from 1983 to 1984,-while the overall
manufacturing rate remained relatively stable (0.23 in 1983, 0.24 in 1984).
• It is important to note, however, that these rates are suitable for comparison only:
they are not necessarily reliable indications of actual illness levels, because 1) they reflect
only reported levels of illness, and 2) the employment data used for the denominator is
current to March 1983 only, and thus may reflect a different population of firms in any
or all of the SIC categories.
Nonetheless, the relatively high (and increasing) number of reports of illness in SIC
3679 is a potential indicator that this industry should be further scrutinized. The types of
specific health effects well captured by illness reporting systems, such as eye irritations,
and acute respiratory effects of toxic inhalations, are also consistent with the types of
hazards known to exist in the industry, such as acids and solvents. (Though specific
breakdowns of illness totals by type of illness were not obtained for four-digit SICs for
-137-
-------
this report, SIC 367 contributed nearly one-half of all chemical burns reported through the
Doctor's First Report system in the county. Unfortunately, as noted, reports from 3679
cannot be differentiated from those of semiconductors or other 367 industries).
5.2.7 Summary and Recommendations
This SIC does not rank at all high (bottom 50%) in the IBER system of industry
hazard ranking, based on actual exposure levels found by federal OSHA, nor were any
overexposures found in the fifteen CAL/OSHA inspection records reviewed. However, the
nature of the hazards used, particularly lead compounds, acids, chromium, and solvents,
placed it within the top 20% in the OWI rankings, and OSHA inspection data did disclose
occasional overexposures to lead, manganese, mercury, and other substances. Moreover,
anecdotal evidence from two NIOSH HHE's suggests a potential for toxic solvent exposures
related to degreasing operations, and occupational illness data from the Division of Labor
Statistics and Research indicate that acute hazards are a significant and continuing source
of worker illness in this industry. These indications, combined with the significant
contribution of the industry to Santa Clara County employment (over 23,000 workers),
make a case for further attention to this industry.
Such attention may be especially warranted insofar as the demographic distribution of
the industry in favor of small firms (less than 50 workers) makes it difficult for
complaint-driven inspections alone to assess adequately the full range of establishments in
the industry. Indeed, the fragmented nature of SIC 3679 may recommend it as a
worthwhile focus for the County Health Department and local communities through the
Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. According to administrators of the City of Santa
Clara's ordinance, printed circuit board manufacturers presently comprise a large
component of the city's registered users'of hazardous materials; this may be the case in
other communities as well. Review of hazardous materials storage listings could confirm
the nature and quantity of hazardous materials used in given areas by the industry, and
suggest further avenues of inquiry.
Unlike the semiconductor industry, SIC 3679 (and more specifically, printed circuit
board manufacture) uses well understood industrial processes, the proper hazard controls of
which are also well understood. These controls include basic appropriate work practices
(e.g., ventilation, reasonable workplace, use of gloves), and worker training. Good
industrial hygiene in this industry is essentially a matter of applying knowledge and
control methods which already exist.
-138-
-------
5.3 Miscellaneous Plastics Products (STC 3079)
5.3.1 Introduction
The plastics industry in Santa Clara County is noteworthy because of its high
ranking in the IBER ranks, based on OSHA Inspection Data. SIC 3079 ranks 36th if
OSHA hazard weights 7 and 10 (chronic hazards) only are used, and 9th if hazard weights
1, 3, 7 and 10 (acute and chronic hazards) are considered. The industry also has relatively
high employment in the county, about 3,000 workers, and encompasses 120 establishments.
Of the 3,000 employees, about 1,200 work in firms with less than 50 employees, and about
1,800 in firms with 50 to 250 employees. A glance at a listing of business lines from the
NIOSH Industrial File shows that Santa Clara County manufactures a wide variety of
plastics, from house planters, kitchenware and plastic bottles to tubing, pipes, insulation
products, etc.
5.3.2 Materials and Processes
Plastics manufacturing involves an immense number of
chemical compounds and a large number of processes. Some generalizations about both
materials and processes, and their hazards, can be made however.
Plastics are fundamentally manufactured from two components: polymers, which are
often referred to as "resin" when they are part of the starting mixture, and additives,
which contribute to the structure, flexibility, color, fire resistance, etc., of the product.
Polymers are long chains of smaller -compounds, called monomers. While a wide variety of
polymers are used in the plastics industry, 75% of total plastics consumption in the world
consists of the "basic" plastics, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and
polypropylene. (Jarvisalo, pp. 4-5) Other plastics include acrylics, fluorocarbon polymers,
polyurethanes, phenol-formaldehyde resins, unsaturated polyesters, epoxy resins, and
aminoplasts. As with polymers, the additives in plastics manufacturing represent a huge
array of chemical compounds, which, however, can be roughly grouped in the following
categories: plasticizers; flame retardants; heat stabilizers; antioxidants; ultraviolet light
absorbers; blowing agents; initiators; lubricants and flow control agents; antistatic agents;
curing agents; colorants; fillers and reinforcements; solvents; and optical brighteners.
The processes that may be encountered in a plastics factory range from materials
handling to the molding operations that produce the individual unit to the machining of
the finished product. Materials handling includes bulk storage, manual handling of fiber
boxes, drums and bags, and the conveying, proportioning and blending, and drying of resin
and other tasks necessary to deliver the resin and other materials to the production areas.
The resin commonly comes in the form of a powder or pellets, and is mixed with the
necessary additives prior to the molding. Molding operations usually fall into one of three
general categories or a variation thereof: injection molding, compression molding, or
extrusion molding. Most plastic products are created through injection molding, where the
polymer is preheated in a separate chamber and then forced into a closed mold by a high
pressure hydraulic plunger. In compression molding, resin powder is placed directly in a
closed mold, where heat and pressure cause it to take the shape of the mold. Extrusion
molding represents a method for creating a continuous product, such as tubing, rods,
sheeting, film, etc. Here the polymer is conveyed continuously along a screw through
regions of high temperature and pressure, where it is melted and compacted, and forced
through a die that* shapes the final product. Other processing methods include casting,
whereby molten plastic is poured into an open or closed mold and allowed to set;
-139-
-------
lamination, where multiple layers of resin and filler are combined for the final product;
and foam production whereby gas is generated in a fluid polymer to a spongy texture.
Following the cooling of the mold the plastic units may be sprayed with paint or
other chemical compounds, machined or polished, or cut up into individual pieces or
wound onto- reels in the case of extrusion mold products.
5.3.3 Occupational Hazards
In terms of occupational hazards, the polymers used in plastics
manufacture are considered to be inert and non-toxic. The more serious potential hazards
reside in the toxicity of low molecular size substances such as heat degradation products
and the additives mixed with the resins. Specific health hazards depend on the material
and process used in this industry, but some general problems can be outlined.
A historical problem which today's technology has greatly minimized is the potential
exposure to residual monomer vapor or volatiles released during the processing of the
polymers. Many monomers that can be polymerized in resin formation can be converted to
epoxides by the mammalian mixed-function oxidase system. These epoxides or their
reactive metabolites can disrupt cellular structure and function and thus be a possible
cause of carcinogenesis. Epoxides of ethylene, styrene and vinyl chloride have been shown
to be carcinogenic in animal studies and mutagenic in bacterial tests.
A similar potential hazard is the toxicity of thermal decomposition products. This
should be a significant concern in plastics fabrication only if processing temperatures,
through equipment failure .or malfunction, exceed the normal recommended range by a
large margin. Carbon, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are common decomposition
products in most polymers. In addition, depending on the material, temperature and
amount of oxygen present, other toxic gases can be released. These include hydrogen
cyanide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, various fluorinated gases, acrylic acid,
formaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, etc. Furthermore, flame-retardant chemical modifiers
common in molding formulations can release toxic and corrosive gases at temperatures over
475 F.
In addition to monomers, additives represent a serious potential health hazard in the
plastics industry. Some typical examples will illustrate this danger.
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), one of the most important plasticizers used today, has
been shown to be a carcinogen and teratogen in animal studies and a mutagen in bacterial
bioassays. In 1980 NIOSH estimated about 625,000 U.S. workers were potentially exposed to
DEHP. (Jarvisalo, p. 118) The major industries with the greatest exposure were plastics
and rubber plants.
Heat stabilizers pose another potential hazard among additives. Major heat stabilizers
include barium-cadmium, organotins, lead, calcium-zinc, and antimony. A number of
studies have been done on organotin and lead stabilizers. Trialkyl tin compounds were
found to affect the central nervous system, while dialkyl tin compounds produced bile duct
lesions in animal studies. In general, diorganotins were found to have genotoxic effects in
vitro and reproductive anomalies in animals. Lead stabilizers account for about 60% of
total stabilizer consumption. While acute lead poisoning has been extremely unlikely with
modern technology, the subtle health effects of low level chronic exposure continue to be a
concern of occupational health.
-140-
-------
Blowing agents, widely used in the preparation of foamed plastics, are designed to
decompose completely in the plastics processing, but it is not certain that they do. Azobis
isobutyronitrile, a prominently employed thermally labile blowing agent, has been found to
produce liver and kidney lesions in animal studies. Azodicarbonamide, another blowing
agent, is currently being tested for carcinogenicity by the National Toxicology Program.
Free radical initiators, used to initiate the polymerization of monomers, include a
broad spectrum of peroxides and peroxy compounds. Animal studies have indicated
tumor-promoting ability in benzoyl peroxide, and bacterial tests have shown mutagenic
properties in a number of organic peroxides.
What becomes apparent in considering the health effects of the additives used in the
plastics industry is the paucity of toxicity data and the lack of sufficient epidemiological
studies for the majority of these compounds.
Nuisance dust, generated in the handling of bulk polymers in powder form (or less so
in pellet form), in the regrinding of scrap plastics for recycling, and from a variety of
additives, can also present a health hazard. Specific occupational exposure limits do not
exist for most of these particulates and thus they must be evaluated primarily as nuisance
dust.
Exposure to some resin systems has been associated with another common occupational
health problem, dermatitis. This can result from primary irritants, such as solvents, or
sensitizing agents such as formaldehyde, isocyanates and organic amines.
5.3.4 Potential Exposures Data
In terms of potential exposures the plastics industry ranked
87 out of 412 industries, or in the top 25th percentile, in the NIOSH IRI rankings based
on the NOHS survey. The OSHA Weighted Index, on the other hand, placed plastics in the
286th rank out of 549 industries ranked, or in the top 50th percentile -indicating a much
lower hazard potential than the IRI ranking. It is interesting to note that both the OWI
and IRI systems ranked SIC 3079 considerably less hazardous than the HESIS IBER ranking
(9, as mentioned in the opening paragraph), which is based on actual rather than potential
exposures, i.e. OSHA inspection data.
Potential exposures in the plastics industry are also indicated by OSHA's listing of
substances by individual weighted indices in an industry, from which the industry OWI
•rank is derived. Table 5.3-1 shows the top 80 substances out of a total of 419 evaluated
for SIC 3079, for which 130 firms employing 16,905 workers were surveyed. In this case a
high weighted index indicates high potential exposure, either because of large numbers of
full-time worker exposures or highly hazardous substances or both.
5.3.5 Actual Exposures Data
5.3.S.I Federal OSHA
OSHA inspection files for the years 1979 to 1982 provide data on actual exposures in
the plastics industry. A total of 220 inspections were conducted for SIC 3079, with 13'87
samples taken, for 104 substances. Table 5.3-2 lists the substances with at least one sample
over 50% of the PEL. All of these substances except for four had samples with values
-141-
-------
Table 5.3-1
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS (SIC 3079)
DESCRIPTION
—-NQHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
16.905
130
IIIFOM
CODE
2037
0527
9050
2460
2590
9090
1290
2135
2229
1018
5010
2532
2040
0290
1720
C0320
9030
0874
2490
0490
0760
2000
0686
2540
1591
1010
9210
2170
1660
0570
1779
1913
0490
0490
C9020
50'10
9010
0527
1591
0374
0230
NOHS
CODE
M2829
80243
84055
73300
76720
17366
33640
80221
M1463
M0347
52138
82880
55460
90320
46970
09070
71055
24130
73790
83628
20380
M0600
81876
74990
83453
25145
94220
M0256
45930
17490
48535
32385-
M2267
15570
90310
52131
M1806
M0647
42490
80517
07310
1.1.1-
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
CARBON
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
TOLUENE
XYLENE
GRAPHITE
FORMALDEHYDE
ETHYLENE, TETRAFLUORO-. POLYMER
IRON OXIDE, RED
ETHYLHEXYl) PHTHALATE, BISC2-
OIL. LUBE
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
PHENOL
ASPHALT
TRICHLOROETHANE,
BENZENE
TALC
DICIILOROETHANE, 1.2-
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
CADMIUM SULFIDE
CRESOL
PARAFFIN
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (
TURPENTINE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
DIOXANE, 1,4-
WOODS
PROPANOL. 1-
METHANOL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
MICA
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
C.I. 77196-PIGMENT ORANGE 20
CADMIUM
ASBESTOS
OIL. CUTTING
SILICA FLOUR
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
LEAD
SODIUM BORATE
ANTInOHY
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
3.719
2,001
2,353
2,255
2.064
2,019
1.273
,785
.778
,227
.209
,623
,087
.056
,484
.006
,419
979
1.394
872
811
784
763
1.070
750
723
723
700
965
671
952
663
658
650
644
639
910
633
628
868
603
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.219
.118
.139
.133
.122
.119
.075
.105
.105
.072
.071
.096
.064
.062
.087
.059
.083
.057
.082
.051
.047
.046
.045
.063
.044
.042
.042
.041
.057
.039
.056
.039
.038
.038
.038
.037
.053
.037
.037
.051
.035
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
UEICHTED
INDEX
2.199
1.183
.974
.933
.854
.836
.753
.739
.736
.725
.715
.672
.643
.624
.614
.595
.587
.579
.577
.515
.479
.463
.451
.443
.443
.427
.427
.414
.399
.396
.394
.392
.389
.384
.380
.377
.376
.374
.371
.359
.356
-------
C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
79 MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS
OCCUPATIONAL 5AFFTY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
16,905
130
IHFOM
CODE
0230
1060
1941
1190
2020
1060
0686
1520
1591
0220
1631
0490
1560
0160
2620
1&60
1591
0867
1520
0490
2037
0540
0933
0860
1520
0590
C0260
0830
1536
1620
2540
0490
0020
0871
1620
2611
0490
1591
0686
NOUS
CODE
A1433
31500
51090
32550
54790
M0238
M1499
40297
83062
06580
M1643
M1507
40987
20265
M0626
50742
84546
24003
70131
83718
M0630
17370
81806
M4016
80990
46240
07555
21660
40430
44030
M1322
M2270
01568
24095
81664
77150
15630
42685
M0926
DESCRIPTION
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
NITROPROPANE, 2-
ETHYLEHE OXIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ALCOHOL
CHROME GREEN
IRON OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE, TRIBASIC
ANILINE
MERCURY SULFIDE
CADMIUM LITMOPONE SELENIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
NITRIC ACID
LEAD SULFATE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
CADMIUM SELENIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
DIETIIYL PHTHALATE
PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-,
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
METHOXYETHANOL, 2-
ARSENIC OXIDES
CYCLOHEXANONE
ISODUTYL ALCOHOL
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
TURPENTINE (GUM)
C.I. 77199-PIGMENT ORANGE 20
ACETIC ACID
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
MANGANESE OXIDE
ZINC CHLORIDE
CADMIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
2-
EXPOSURE^
FACTOR
585
1,934
569
509
728
1.677
501
696
488
687
463
460
4,558
1,454
610
416
416
413
591
413
378
378
1,249
1,211
504
490
340
1,129
336
455
454
317
428
2.918
413
272
270
266
260
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.034
.114
.033
.030
.043
.099
.029
.041
.028
.040
.027 •
.027
.269
.086
.036
.024
.024
.024
.034
.024
.022
.022
.073
.071
.029
.028
.020
.066
.019
.026
.026
.018
.025
.172
.024
.016
.015
.015
.015
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
03
10
10
07
03
10
07
10
07
10
10
01
03
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
03
03
07
07
10
03
10
07
07
10
07
01
07
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.346
.343
.336
.301
.301
.297
.296
.288
.288
.284
.273
.272
.269
.258
.252
.246
.246
.244
.244
.244
.223
.223
.221
.214
.208
.202
.201
.200
.198
.188
.187
.187
.177
.172
.171
.160
. 159
.157
.153
419 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3079
OTHER TOTALS:
138,212
8.004
42.647
-------
Table 5.3-2
Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3079:
Substances with Sampled Exposures at or above 50% of the OSHA PEL
Substance
lead arsenate
lead. Inorganic fumes & dust
methylene chloride
methyl methacrylate
phenol
styrene monomer
toluene
toluene-?, 4-di isocyanate (TPI)
trichloro-1,2,2
trifluoroethane.1,1,2
vinyl chloride
4, 4 '-methylene bis
(2, chloroaniline) (MOCA)
silica
asbestos
antimony
2-butanone (MEK)
cadnium dust
carbon disulfide
chronic acid & chromates
methylene bisphenyl
di isocyanate (Mm)
hexanone
nuisance dust
total dust
No of
Inspec
12
21
14
2
4
45
30
19
1
13
3
6
15
6
37
9
2
2
15
fi
31
?2
No of
Samples
22
66
25
5
in
209
73
65
4
28
12
a
26
13
124
42
14
5
33
28
66
41
Mean
Proptn
of PEL
1.16
1.93
0.07
0.41
2.54
0.53
0.11
0.60
0.67
0.02
• 4.85
0.07
0.07
0.37
0.16
0.13
0.67
0.62
0.12
0.34
0.84
1.26
Max
Proptn
of PEL
16.50
52.80
0.57
1.21
10.00
2.47
1.19
19.97
0.93
0.64
31.15
0.63
0.96
1.51
2.99
2.10
3.60
1.94
3.50
1.70
11.71
36.20
No Insp
w/ some
Snip > PEL
2
10
0
1
1
19
1
4
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
Number
Insp w/
Mean > PEL
2
9
0
0
1
8
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
5
6
No of
Samples
Ovr PEL
4
23
0
1
1
47
2
9
0
0
3
0
0
1
4
1
3
2
1
2
8
8
Source: OSHA MIS 1979-82.
-------
exceeding the PEL. Two exposures were for monomers, vinyl chloride and styrene, while
the rest appear to be mainly from additives, including solvents. Particularly large numbers
of overexposures should be noted for lead, styrene, and particulates (consisting of nuisance
dust and total dust).
5.3.5.2 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data
CAL/OSHA data for SIC 3079 was limited for Santa Clara County. Between 1981
and 1983, CAL/OSHA inspection files show one facility inspected to investigate exposures
of cyclohexanone and MEK. Breathing zone samples found no exposures over the PEL.
5.3.5.3 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations
NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's), are another source of data on actual and
potential exposures in the industry. Fifteen HHE's conducted for the plastics industry (SIC
3079) between 1978 and 1984 were reviewed. Specific concerns expressed by employers or
employees requesting the HHE dealt with skin contact with polymer pellets and dust and
colorants, inhalation of gases in molding areas, exposures to heavy metals, ketones, acrylic
resins, azodicarbamide, and polyethylene dust, and associations between exposures and
breast and cervical cancer, and Hodgkins disease. Common medical complaints included
headaches, nausea, lightheadedness, eyes, nose and throat and upper respiratory irritation,
labored breathing, chest pain, and dyspnea.
NIOSH sampled a wide variety of substances including solvents, heavy metals,
monomers and polymer dust, heat degradation volatiles, and miscellaneous particulates.
Actual overexposures were found in only 3 HHE's: these included overexposures to
organotin, a heat stabilizing agent (samples taken near extruder based in blow molding
process); cadmium, a coloring additive (samples taken in set up area of injection molding
department); carbon monoxide, a heat degradation product (high exposures found in several
departments); methylene chloride, a solvent (samples taken in foam production area); and
styrene, a monomer (samples taken near a molding operation). In a few instances, even
though no environmental samples exceeded NIOSH or OSHA criteria, medical tests
including pulmonary function tests and the radioallergosorbent technique (RAST) indicated
overexposures to two potentially sensitizing agents, toluene-2,2-diisocyanate (TDI) and
hexahydrophthalic anhydride (HHPA). TDI is used as a foaming agent while HHPA is a
curing agent for epoxy resins. Although there were few overexposures in
the HHE's exposure monitoring, concern was expressed for the synergistic effects of the
various chemical exposures.
5.3.6 Occupational Illness Statistics
To assess occupational illness in SIC 3079 in Santa Clara County, we reviewed the
Employer's Reports and Doctor's First Reports of occupational injury and illness databases
maintained by the Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR). We obtained Santa
Clara County data from DLSR from both systems for the years 1982-84. Problems
encountered using Doctor's First Reports data for other SIC's profiled, due to the
unavailability of 4-digit SIC tabulations, did not exist in this SIC because 3079 is the only
4-digit SIC in SIC 307.
Very few Employer's Reports of occupational illness were generated by SIC 3079 in
the years 1982-84 in the county: in 1982, there were none at all; in 1983, there were six;
and in 1984, there were twelve. These figures represent "disabling" illnesses, i.e.,
-145-
-------
those which caused at least one lost work day. The 1984 figure represents about 0.07%
of all 1984 Santa Clara County Employer's Reports for disabling occupational illness.
Doctor's First Reports for the county were filed for SIC 3079 workers as follows:
sixteen reports were filed in 1982, the same number in 1983, and 22 in 1984. (These
figures all refer to occupational illness only, and do not distinguish between cases
which involved lost work days and those which did not.) The Doctor's First Report data
obtained from DLSR also showed detailed breakdowns of illness type for this SIC. The
reports filed were almost entirely for skin or eye conditions, or chemical burns; in
1984 there were also two cases of systemic poisoning. The 22 reports in 1984
represented about 0.9% of all reports filed in the county for that year (2,552), and
about 1.8% of all reports in manufacturing industries for that year (1,239).
References
Jarvisalo, Jorma, Pirkko Pfaffli and Harri Vainio, Industrial Hazards of Plastics and
Synthetic Elastomers. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1984.
Mutchler, John E. and Kenneth G. Proskie, "Plastics Processing Operations", Ch. 16 in
Industrial Hveiene Aspects of Plant Operations. Lewis J. Cralley and Lester V. Cralley
(eds.), Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1984.
-146-
-------
5.4 Electroplating (SIC 3471)
5.4.1 Demographics
In Santa Clara County, 1,034 workers are employed in electroplating facilities.
Approximately 60% work in shops employing less than 50 workers. The remaining 40% are
employed by a single electronics company.
5.4.2 Materials and Processes
Metal, plastic and rubber parts are plated to prevent rusting and corrosion, for the
sake of appearance, to reduce electrical contact operations, and to improve wearability.
Electroplating is the process of applying a metal coating through the action of an electric
current. The complete process includes physical pretreatment steps where the pieces are
worked and formed and subsequently chemically treated to remove any contamination from
the metal surface. The fundamental electroplating process is quite simple and standardized
varying essentially only with the plating solution and base metal to be plated. The
common plating metals include cadmium, chromium, copper, gold, nickel, silver and their
alloys. Degreasing solvents, such as trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, methyl chloroform
and freons are used in the chemical pretreatment steps. Acids, alkalies and cyanide
solutions are used extensively.
Local exhaust ventilation is the principle control measure for this industry. Other
controls include additives to reduce surface tension and suppress misting in the tanks;
where possible tanks are provided with covers. Protective aprons and gloves are generally
supplied by the employers.
5.4.3 Potential Exposures
The National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS) (1974) provided extent-of-exposure
data upon which both OSHA and NIOSH have developed systems for ranking industries by
degree of associated potential hazard (Section 4). According to the Industrial Risk Index
(IRI), electroplating (SIC 3471) ranks 123, out of 412 industries ranked. According to the
OSHA Weighted Index (OWI), electroplating ranks 76 out of 549 industries, placing it
within the top 20% of the industries ranked using this system. In developing the OWI
ranking, OSHA rated the 257 substances in 23 facilities employing 771 workers which were
identified in the NOHS. The top eighty greatest potential hazards used in electroplating as
identified by OWI are shown in Table 5.4-1. As can be seen, substances with the greatest
potential risk in this industry include acids, silica, asbestos,
and hydrogen fluoride.
5.4.4 Actual Exposures
5.4.4.1 Federal OSHA Inspection Data
Data from OSHA inspections based on actual exposures were reviewed for the years
1979-82. Eighty-four inspections were conducted in SIC 3471, during which 509 samples
were taken for 51 substances. Nineteen samples from nine substances were over the PEL.
Table 5.4-2 is a listing of substances sampled by OSHA with monitored levels higher than
-147-
-------
Table 5.4-1
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
PLATING AND POLISHING (SIC 3471)
DESCRIPTION
771
23
IHFOM
I
CODE
1860
0686
2310
1430
9050
2229
2037
2620
1520
1840
0160
2432
9010
2537
MC9020
**
CO
I
1840
1460
0790
0490
0374
1591
1840
0686
0170
0790
0020
2460
1591
1840
0790
0790
1842
1018
2240
0230
0230
2040
0290
2490
2590
2000
NOHS
CODE
50742
19360
70870
38580
84055
M1463
M2829
M0626
40297
50510
20265
73253
M1806
80230
90310
81906
38550
68950
15630
80517
42490
81904
90570
05250
60400
01568
73300
M0751
50440
80720
M0052
50495
M0347
M0105
A1433
07310
55460
90320
73790
76720
110600
NITRIC ACID
CHROMIC ACID
SULFURIC ACID
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDE, RED
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDES
NICKEL SULFATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
SILICA FLOUR
TUNGSTEN CARBIDE
ASBESTOS
NICKEL ACETATE
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
SODIUM CYANIDE
CADMIUM OXIDES
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD
NICKEL SALTS
CHROMOUS SALTS
A111 IONIA
POTASSIUM CYANIDE
ACETIC ACID
TOLUENE
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
NICKEL CHLORIDE
ZItIC CYANIDE
INORGANIC CYANIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2-
INORGANIC SILVER COMPOUNDS
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
PHEHOL
ASPHALT
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
XYLEUE
PARAFFIN
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
257
241
329
275
251
241
153
217
193
134
411
173
166
166
112
100
96
136
90
128
87
87
87
120
115
114
114
75
70
97
96
66
61
87
57
57
53
52
74
73
49
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.333
.312
.426
.356
.325
.312
.198
.281
.250
.173
.533
.224
.215
.215
.145
.129
.124
.176
.116
.166
.112
.112
.112
.155
.149
.147
.147
.097
.090
.125
.124
.085
.079
.112
.073
.073
.068
.067
.095
.094
.063
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 3.333
10 3.125
07 2.987
07 2.496
07 2.278
07 2.188
10
07
07
10
03
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
.984
.970
.752
.738
.599
.570
.507
.507
.452
.297
.245
.234
.167
.162
.128
.128
.128
.089
.044
.035
.035
10 .972
10 .907
07 .880
07 .871
10 .856
10 .791
07 .789
10 .739
10 .739
10 .687
10 .674
07 .671
07 .662
10 .635
-------
Z3 CZZ)
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
.1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1471 PLATING AND POLISHING
---NOHS
EMPLOYMENT
771
SURVEYED ---
FIRMS
IHFOM
CODE
1536
1631
C0320
0570
0874
1842
0490
2537
0686
0760
1290
0790
0360
1591
2260
1720
1660
2080
2420
2085
2611
0527
2170
1842
0560
0735
1620
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
2570
1060
1591
9090
NOHS
CODE
40430
45315
09070
17490
24130
50420
82783
A1003
80064
20380
33640
81950
11855
42685
69070
46970
45930
57740
72085
58520
77150
80243
MO 2 56
82846
17460
94040
44035
80247
81748
81749
83005
83628
83718
84157
84478
A1010
315CO
M0125
17366
DESCRIPTION
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
MERCURY OXIDES
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DICHLOROETIIANE, 1,2-
NICKEL
CADMIUM CYANIDE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
POTASSIUM DICIIROMATE(VI)
CRESOL
FORMALDEHYDE
GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
METHANOL
PH05PHINE
THALLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHORIC ACID
ZINC CHLORIDE
CARBON
PROPANOL. 1-
NICKEL CYANIDE
CARBON MONOXIDE
COTTON
MANGANESE OXIDES
CADMIUM SULFATE
CADMIUM IODIDE
CADMIUM NITRATE
CADMIUM TELLURIDE
CADMIUM SULFIDE
CADMIUM SELENIDE
CADMIUM PHOSPHATE
CADMIUM CHLORIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
ETHYL ALCOHOL
LEAD MONOXIDE
GRAPHITE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
49
46
45
45
45
45
45
63
43
42
42
57
38
38
376
51
50
35
35
332
32
32
30
30
41
. 41
38
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
35
75
21
30
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.063
.059
.058
.058
.058
.058
.058
.081
.055
.054
.054
.073
.049
.049
.487
.066
.064
.045
.045
.430
.041
.041
.038
.038
.053
.053
.049
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.045
.097
.027
.038
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
01
07
07
10
10
01
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
07
WEIGHTEI
INDEX
.635
.596
.583
.583
.583
.583
.583
.571
.557
.544
.544
.517
.492
.492
.487
.463
.453
.453
.453
.430
.415
.415
.389
.389
.372
.372
.345
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.317
.291
.272
.272
257 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3471
OTHER TOTALS:
11.089
14.244
86.252
-------
Table 5.4-2
Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3471:
Substances with Sampled Exposure at or above 50% of the OSHA PEL
1
t->
en
0
1
Substance
Chromates
' Chromic acid
Copper
Hydrogen chloride
Lead arsenate
Inorg. manganates
Methylene chloride
Nickel (soluble)
Nickel , metal
Sulfurlc acid
Trichloroethylene
Silica
Dust
No of
Inspec
24
23
11
12
7
2
2
15
7
18
9
5
?.
No of
Samples
51
51
24
27
12
4
4
29
13
45
Ifi
13
7
Mean
Proptn
of PEL
n.05
. 0.09
0.09
0.13
1.01
0.70
0.51
0.04
0.14
0.07
0.7fi
2.45
2.3R
Max
Proptn
of PFL
1.10
0.86
1.70
1.23
11.40
2.80
1.33
0.89
0.73
0.96
2.18
14.10
12.80
No Insp
w/ some
Smp > PEL
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
3
3
1
Number
Insp w/
Mean > PEL
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
No of
Samples
Ovr PEL
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
6
4
2
-------
50% of the PEL. All aspects of the electroplating process produce potentially hazardous
substances with monitored exposures greater than 50% of the PEL: pretreatment generates
silica, dusts, solvents; plating exposes workers to oxides and metals.
An Inspection Based Exposure Ranking (IBER) scheme was developed (Section 4) from
the OSHA inspection data. SIC 3471, plating and polishing, has an IBER of 98 out of 475
industries ranked, placing it just outside the top 20% of IBER hazardous industries.
5.4.4.2 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data, 1981-83
Cal/OSHA inspection files from 1981-1983 contain inspection data from two
electroplating firms in Santa Clara County. Acids and caustics used in the pretreatment
process, sodium cyanide and chromium in the plating solutions, and nitrogen dioxide and
hydrogen chloride gases were the potential exposure hazards, but no monitoring for these
substances was performed.
5.4.4.3 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations
Four Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) performed by NIOSH in the years 1980-84
were examined for examples of the types of exposures and health effects occurring in this
industry. They were found to have exposure levels within the acceptable limits.
Recommendations were made, however, for reducing exposures to chromium and sulfuric
acid through such methods as the use of protective clothing and work practice
improvements, monitoring and/or upgrading of existing local exhaust ventilation systems,
and the institution of comprehensive safety and health programs.
5.4.5 Occupational Illness Statistics
Information available from the California Division of Labor Statistics and Research
(DLSR) were reviewed for 1983 and 1984 to assess reported occupational illness in SIC
3471.
Data from Employer's First Reports for "disabling" illnesses (resulting in at least one
lost work day) show that for 1983 there were 8 disabling illnesses reported for SIC 3471
out of 1599 non-government agency reports in the county; in 1984 there were also 8
disabling illnesses reported out of 1599 non-government agency reports. These cases
represent 0.62% and 0.57% respectively of the total reports for the county. Another way to
analyze them is to say that electroplating, which employs 1,034 in Santa Clara County out
of the total employment of 648,000, accounts for approximately 0.16% of the county's total
employment. Proportionally there are 3 1/2 times the reports of occupational disease for
this SIC than would be expected for the number employed in the county for this industry.
We obtained data from DLSR showing types of illness represented by Employer's
Reports for 1984, but only for the 3-digit SIC 347. Illness types included dermatitis, lower
respiratory conditions, and- diseases of the eye other than conjunctivitis, with eye diseases
being the major type.
Doctor's First Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness contain reports of those
cases which the physician felt were work related. Only 3-digit SIC breakdowns are
available for this database. SIC 347 contains data on coating and engraving as well as
-151-
-------
electroplating. In 1983 there were 37 total reports in Santa Clara County for SIC 347.
Eye conditions, chemical burns, skin conditions and systemic poisonings were the major
health effects of these industries. In 1984, there were 36 total reports with the same
profile, eye conditions accounting for half the diseases reported.
-152-
-------
5.5 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (STC 8062)
5.5.1 Introduction
One of the largest employers in Santa Clara County is the hospital industry. (While
the 3-digit SIC 806 covers all hospitals, this profile addresses SIC 8062 alone, as this
specific SIC is the large employer in Santa Clara County. When we refer to hospitals or
the hospital industry, we are referring to SIC 8062.) Eleven hospitals employ about 14,000
people, with employment in individual establishments ranging from 100 to 2,000 personnel.
Although hospital employees are susceptible to potentially serious physical, chemical and
biological occupational hazards, many hospitals, like universities and research labs, lack the
programs and professionals to assess the work environment risk and institute protective
measures.
5.5.2 Occupational Hazards
Physical hazards include electrical hazards, slippery floors, noise, heat, poor lighting
and inadequate ventilation.' The best documented problems are accidents, which frequently
occur while handling patients or equipment.
A major hazard to hospital employees is the use of toxic chemicals, especially
inhalation anesthetics, sterilants and anticancer drugs. The most common inhalation
anesthetics are nitrous oxide, halothane, and methoxyflurane. While low level exposure
health effects are still controversial, the best documented hazard is to the reproductive
system, with a correlation between exposed women and spontaneous abortions. Other health
risks include mutagenicity and carcinogenicity, liver disease, and renal damage, as
indicated by animal studies and limited epidemiological evidence. The narcotizing and
immune depressant effects of anesthetic agents have also been studied. Measures to control
exposures should include possible substitution of less toxic agents, better scavenging and
ventilation systems, and improved employee practices with respect to equipment usage.
Two sterilants commonly used are ethylene oxide and formaldehyde. Ethylene oxide
is a powerful alkyiating agent used for sterilizing equipment and materials in hospitals
that cannot be subjected to high temperatures. The hazards lie in both acute and chronic
exposure, which can cause respiratory tract irritation, central nervous system effects,
gastrointestinal symptoms and chemical burns. Animal studies also suggest increased rates
of leukemia, sister chromatid exchange, and reproductive problems including teratogenesis
and spontaneous abortion. A recent OSHA standard requires a PEL of 1 ppm, detailed
industrial hygiene monitoring and medical surveillance. Employee education and training,
restricted areas, and the use of engineering controls are also mandated by this standard.
In April, 1984, CAL/OSHA did a special studies report on this toxic sterilant, which covers
its use, sampling methods, and applicable CAL/OSHA regulations. Currently the CAL/OSHA
PEL for ethylene oxide is the same as the federal standard of 1 ppm. In California it is
regulated as a carcinogen.
Formaldehyde is another sterilant which is also used as aqueous solution in pathology
labs. Most common exposures come from autopsy rooms and renal dialysis units, in
addition to pathology labs. Levels of less than 1 ppm can cause irritation of skin, eyes,
nose, throat and lungs. Immunogenic responses include asthma and dermatitis. A serious
concern suggested by animal studies is the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of chronic
low level exposure to this agent. IARC has determined that formaldehyde should be
-153-
-------
treated as a potential human carcinogen; neither federal OSHA nor CAL/OSHA currently
regulate formaldehyde as a carcinogen.
Anticancer drugs include alkylating agents, antimetabolites, antibiotics and hormones.
Occupational exposure studies have shown detectable air levels of these drugs in hospital
units with no hoods, where nurses often prepare doses. In addition to being irritants to
skin, eyes, mucous membranes and other tissues, these chemical agents are potential
mutagens and carcinogens, as well as possibly hepatotoxic. The clinical toxicity, through
case studies of patients to whom the drugs have been administered, animal studies and
chromosome damage assessment has been well established, but there is little information
available on the occupational health effects of handling these drugs. A recent concern is
the reproductive effect of these drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine recently
published a paper suggesting a "statistically significant association between fetal loss and
occupational exposure to neoplastic drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy."1 In
preparing doses of anticancer drugs, hospital personnel should use fume cabinets and wear
protective gloves and face masks.
Other hospital employee hazards include radiation, infectious diseases and stress
factors. Although many hospital workers are exposed to radiation, the exposure is often
undetectable and'there is controversy over assessment of biological risks from chronic low
doses. Infectious disease risk is an obvious hazard, but can be lowered by enforcing
several practices: vaccination against infectious agents where possible; following proper
isolation procedures; washing hands after contact with patients; and proper handling of
potentially infectious blood and secretions. Stress hazards stem from having to make
critical decisions under pressure, emotional factors and unsettling work schedules.
5.5.3 Exposure Data
Examples of actual overexposures to toxic chemicals in the hospital work environment
can be found in federal OSHA and CAL/OSHA inspection files. Between the years 1979
and 1982 federal OSHA conducted 26 inspections of hospitals and took 128 samples. Five
chemicals were found to have overexposures: chloroform, ethrane, formaldehyde, nitrous
oxide and xylene. One test sample out of 4 was over the PEL for chloroform while the
maximum level monitored was almost twice the PEL. Ethrane, an inhalation anesthetic,
had five samples out of 17 over the PEL, with its maximum sample four times the PEL.
Formaldehyde had 17 samples taken, of which six were over the PEL and the highest
sample 5.7 times the PEL. For nitrous oxide there was only one inspection, for which
four samples were take - all four were over the PEL, while the highest sample exceeded
the PEL by a factor of ten. Xylene exceeded the PEL in only one sample out of a total
of 16, with a maximum level at 1.45 times the PEL.
Potential exposures in hospitals are indicated by OSHA's listing of substances by
individual weighted indices in an industry, from which the industry OWI rank is derived
(discussed in section 4). Only a 3-digit listing was available covering all hospitals;
therefore psychiatric and other specialty hospitals are included in this listing. Table 5.5-1
shows the top 80 substances out of a total of 444 evaluated for SIC 806, for which 43
facilities with a combined employment of 21,955 were surveyed. The resulting OWI rank
for hospitals was 248 out of 549 industries, or in the top 50th percentile.
Using CAL/OSHA inspection files we looked at 12 inspections covering five Santa
Clara hospitals. There were two instances of overexposures, both at the same facility for
the same substance, formaldehyde. The overexposures occurred in the histology lab and
-154-
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
HOSPITALS (SIC 8060)
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
21,955
43
IHFOM
CODE
1290
0867
1060
0868
0374
1591
2037
0020
1369
1190
1430
0170
1913
I 1720
|t C0320
S UIO
I 0570
1660
2000
1060
2490
0874
2460
2590
2540
0760
2170
2020
9030
2037
0540
2040
1560
9050
9090
1970
2611
0220
2510
0522
0670
NOHS
CODE
33640
24003
31500
24006
80517
M1693
M2829
01568
35960
A1719
38580
05250
32385
46970
09070
33720
17490
45930
M0600
M0238
73790
24130
73300
76720
74990
20380
M0256
54790
71055
M0630
17370
55460
40987
84055
17366
52480
77150
06580
70870
15800
18500
DESCRIPTION
FORMALDEHYDE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
ETHYL ALCOHOL
DICHLOROBENZENE. PARA-
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD SOAP
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ACETIC ACID
HEPTACHLOR
ETHYLENE OXIDE CONDENSATE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
AMMONIA
EIHYLENE GLYCOL
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1-
BEHZENE
FORMIC ACID
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
METHANOL
PARAFFIN
ALCOHOL
'ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2-
TOLUENE
XYLEME
TURPF.HTINE
CRESUL
PROP^NOL, 1-
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TALC
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
PHENOL
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
GRAPHITE
OXALIC ACID
ZINC CHLORIDE
ANILINE
SULFURIC ACID
CAMPHOR
CHLOROFORM
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
4.264
3,968
12,786
3,592
4.899
3,297
3,202
4,542
2.971
2,926
4,086
3,569
2,448
3,330
2.117
3,020
2,067
2.839
1,789
5,944
2,303
1,527
2,155
2,069
,746
,215
,197
,711
,627
1,086
1.086
1,074
10,595
1,440
1.235
850
810
1.151
995
965
673
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.194
.180
.582
.163
.223
.150
.145
.206
.135
.133
.186
.162
.111
.151
.096
.137
.094
.129
.081
.270
.104
.069
.098
.094
.079
.055
.054
.077
.074
.049
.049
.048
.482
.065
.056
.038
.036
.052
.045
. 043
.030
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
03
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
03
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
01
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
1.942
1.807
1.747
1.636
1.561
1.501
1.458
1.448
1.353
1.332
1.302
1.137
1.115
1.061
.964
.962
.941
.905
.814
.812
.734
.695
.687
.659
.556
.553
.545
.545
.518
.494
.494
.489
.482
.459
.393
.387
. 368
. 366
. 317
.307
. 306
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
8060 HOSPITALS
Table 5.5-1 (2)
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
IHFOM
CODE
1860
0871
1030
0527
2260
2532
0040
0290
0820
2085
1470
1010
2140
I 0860
M 0515
ui 0900
-------
the pathology lab. Other air samples revealed concentrations of carbon monoxide, nitrogen
oxide, xylene, toluene and isopropanol, but none were over the PEL.
Hospitals as an industry did not rank high in the IBER ranking system. If chronic
hazards (OSHA hazard weights 7 and 10) only are considered, hospitals rank 248 (out of
475) in the IBER system. If acute hazards are considered as well (OSHA hazard weights
1, 3, 7, and 10), then hospitals have an IBER rank of 180, placing the industry in the 38th
percentile of IBER hazardous industries.
5.5.4 Further Information
Sources of information on occupational hazards in hospitals can be found as follows:
a) NIOSH Publications (per the 1984 catalog):
• 49 Health Hazard Evaluations
• 6 Control Technology Reports
• 1 Industry Wide Study
• 10 reports (approximately) not included
in categories above;
b) CAL/OSHA Special Studies Report, April 1984, Occupational Exposures to
Ethvlene Oxide in : Hospitals. Medical Products Industries. Spice Plants. State of
California, DIR, DOSH
c) While a literature review is not in the scope of this section, two excellent articles
summarize hospital occupational hazards, with extensive references:
• Patterson, W.B., et al, "Occupational Hazards to Hospital Personnel," Annals of
Internal Medicine. Vol. 102, No. 5, May 1985, 658-680 (370 refs.);
• Vainio, Harri, "Inhalation Anesthetics, Anticancer Drugs and Sterilants as
Chemical Hazards in Hospitals," Scandinavian Journal of Work and
Environmental Health. 8 (1982), 94-107 (92 refs).
REFERENCES
1. Selevan, Sherry G. et al, "A Study of Occupational Exposure
to Antineoplastic Drugs and Fetal Loss in Nurses", The New
England Journal of Medicine. Vol. 313, No. 19, November 7,
1985, 1173-1178.
-157-
-------
5.6 FMC Corporation (SIC 3795)
5.6.1 Introduction
FMC Corporation is a large, multi-product company head-quartered in Chicago. Santa
Clara County formerly was home to three FMC Divisions, including Ordnance, Airline
Equipment, and Food Processing machinery, all based in San Jose. The Airline Equipment
and Food Processing Divisions have been relocated out of Santa Clara, and have been
replaced by the Company's International Division and its Defense Systems Headquarters.
These two units, along with the Ordnance Division, are concerned principally with the
manufacture of three military vehicles, the Bradley .Fighting Vehicle, the Ml 13 Armored
Personnel Carrier, and the Amphibious Assault Vehicle. They also perform research and
development on defense technology.
FMC Corporation is included among industry profiles because it is a large Santa
Clara County employer, employing over one percent of the County's entire workforce, and
it has a record of hazardous exposures to workers, as identified by CAL/OSHA and
NIOSH.
5.6.2. Demographics
FMC Corporation employs 6,680 people at various sites in San Jose and the city of
Santa Clara, approximately half (3,200) of whom are production line workers. The 6,680
FMC employees represent just over 1% of the County's workforce. (Note: the total number
of FMC employees presented here was obtained directly from FMC, and is current as of
February 1986. Tha. NIOSH Industrial File employee listings for FMC, dating from 1983,
are somewhat smaller).
The Industrial Classification of FMC's military operations has proven a source of
confusion to CAL/OSHA, NIOSH, and Dun & Bradstreet's Marketing Services (the source of
the NIOSH Industrial File). CAL/OSHA inspections of FMC military manufacturing plants
listed the SIC as 3489 (ordnance) which properly refers only to artillery and not vehicles,
while a NIOSH HHE of these same operations listed the SIC as 999 (nonclassifiable
establishments). The NIOSH Industrial File also lists FMC's military facilities
inappropriately, under SIC 5199 (nondurable goods - wholesale).
For purposes of comparing FMC occupational hazards to other firms which
manufacture similar products, none of these three designations is useful. The SIC 3795 --
tanks --would probably allow the best comparisons for purposes of this report " the
armored vehicles manufactured by FMC are not strictly tanks, but all have some armoring
and are all, like tanks, full-track vehicles.
Due to the misclassification of FMC in the NIOSH Industrial File, we did not focus
on this firm on the basis of its employment alone. Both a member of the Santa Clara
County Chamber of Commerce and members of SCCOSH mentioned FMC as a possible
subject of further inquiry in this report, however.
5.6.3 Operations
FMC is involved primarily with assembly of the three military vehicles named above,
receiving many of the parts pre-fabricated. Production processes span a wide range of
-158-
-------
fabricated metal and vehicle manufacturing processes, including metal plating, spray
painting, tool grinding, machining, degreasing, welding, gluing, foam injection, styrene
impregnation, riveting, plasma arc cutting, metal coating, and others.
5.6.4 CAL/OSHA Inspection Records
CAL/OSHA conducted eight health inspections of FMC between 1979 and 1984, three
of which resulted in citations for overexposures. One of the overexposure citations involved
nuisance dust in the airline equipment division, which is no longer located in Santa Clara
County. The other two citations were given as a result of two separate 1979 inspections
of FMC's military manufacturing operations, one involving overexposures to aluminum
welding fumes, and the other involving overexposures to total particulates from
undifferentiated welding fumes. The substances and monitored exposure levels from
CAL/OSHA inspections (1979-84) of FMC's military vehicle manufacturing plants are shown
in Table 5.6-1. It should be noted that most of the substances monitored, including
ammonia, chloric acid, iron oxide, welding fume, 1,1,1,-trichloroethane, manganese, nitrogen
dioxide, carbon monoxide, and aldehydes, were all well below the PEL. Only one other
substance, MDI (methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate), was monitored near 50% of the PEL.
In addition to the citations for violations of PEL's, CAL/OSHA issued a citation for
violation of the respirator standard (GISO 5144) found in the 1982 inspection. No
overexposures were found during this inspection, however, among the four substances
sampled.
The most recent inspection reviewed (1984) did not include any monitoring. However.
the inspection file contained some of FMC's own monitoring results for aluminum oxide
and chrome welding fumes, which were near or above the CAL/OSHA PEL's. The specific
results are treated here as confidential, because the
manner in which they were taken is not known. No hazard was encountered in this
inspection by the CAL/OSHA inspector, and no citations were issued.
5.6.5 The 1984 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation
In 1984, at the request of representatives of the International Association of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers, local 562, NIOSH conducted an HHE (HETA
84-368-1624) of FMC Corporation, encompassing six military vehicle manufacturing
facilities in San Jose. Both environmental and medical evaluations were performed.
5.6.5.1 NIOSH Environmental Evaluation
NIOSH monitored worker exposures to seventeen substances, including acetone,
asbestos, benzene, cadmium, chromium VI, copper, ethyl acetate, hexane, manganese, methyl
isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, nickel, styrene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and
xylene. Exposures to noise and total particulates were also evaluated.
Of the hazards evaluated by NIOSH, only one was found to be above the CAL/OSHA
PEL — nuisance dust (total particulates). The high levels (two samples at 104% of the PEL)
were found in welding areas. One other substance, the solvent methyl ethyl ketone (MEK.)
was found at a level close to, but not exceeding, the CAL/OSHA PEL. The single level
obtained for MEK was 91% of the MEK' PEL of 200 ppm.
-159-
-------
Table 5.6-1
Substances and Exposure Levels Evaluated for FMC Corporation
(Military Vehicle Manufacture) in CAL/OSHA Inspections, 1979-84
Number
Insp. Year Substances Monitored Samples
1 1979 Welding funes
2 1979 Ammonia,
ammonia hydroxide
3 1979 .Aluminum welding
fumes
4 1980 Chromic acid
(plating process)
5 1982 Welding fumes
(iron oxide)
MOI (methylene
diisocyanate)
1 ,1 ,1-trichloroethane
Manganese
6 1983 Nitrogen dioxide
Nitrogen oxide
Carbon monoxide
Aldehydes
7
NAC
NA
3
1
3
1
1
NA
MA
NA
Range*
6.7-18.9 mg/m3h
«?.7 mg/m
420 mg/m-*
<0.005-
0.022 mg/m3)
0.53 mg/m3
0.01-0.1 ng/m3
-
?4 ppmd
0.006 mg/m3
peak: ?.8 ppm
10 ppm
peak: 0.83 ppm
Current
CAL/OSHA
Mean PEL
11.9 ng/m3 10 mg/m3
NA 10 ng/n3
NA 10 ng/m3
<0.01.1 ng/n3 0.1 mg/m3
5 mg/m3
<0.0fi ng/n3 0.? ng/m3
150 ppm
1 mg/m3
5 ppm
SO ppm
100 ppm
(acetylaldehydel
1984
none
a. All measurements are 8 hr. TWA unless otherwise noted.
b. Milligrams per cubic meter of air.
c. Not available (file contained only summary of monitoring results)
d. parts per mi 11 ion.
-160-
-------
Despite the high exposures measured for nuisance dust, and the relatively high
exposure measured for MEK, NIOSH did not conclude that a health hazard existed due to
these substances, beyond recommending appropriate respirator use. NIOSH did find,
however, that the exposure levels monitored for benzene did pose a health hazard, and that
those monitored for chromium VI posed a potential hazard, even though sampled exposures
to both substances were well below CAL/OSHA PEL'S. In evaluating these exposures,
NIOSH used its own more stringent criteria, based upon its own analysis of current
toxicological knowledge regarding these substances. In the case of chromium VI, a
substance for which "sufficient" evidence of human carcinogenicity exists according to the
International Agency for Research on Cancer, the NIOSH Evaluation criterion is 0.001
mg/m^, or 50 times lower than the current CAL/OSHA PEL. In the case of benzene, for
which "sufficient" evidence of human carcinogenicity also exists, the NIOSH evaluation
criterion is "lowest feasible limit". The absence of respirator use in the gluing area meant
detected levels of up to 0.93 ppm were above the NIOSH criterion.
5.6.5.2 NIOSH Medical Evaluation
A NIOSH physician conducted private interviews with 22 workers from various work
areas. Symptoms discussed included a) nausea and headaches associated with use of
1,1,1,-trichloro-ethane during periodic maintenance cleaning, b) sharp chest pain and cardiac
arrhythmia associated with gluing, c) eye irritation associated with steam cleaning
operations, d) bronchitis and chest tightness associated with welding, e) headache,
sleepiness, and other symptoms associated with use of a particular thinner, and f)
dermatitis, asthma, eye irritation, respiratory irritation, headache, and fatigue associated
with machine coolant exposure.
5.6.5.3 NIOSH Recommendations
On the basis of medical and environmental findings, NIOSH made 15 separate
recommendations to FMC, most of which simply involved the application of basic, sound
industrial hygiene practices, such as appropriate ventilation, monitoring, worker training,
and use of personal protection equipment (e.g. gloves, goggles, and respirators) where
indicated. NIOSH also recommended pulmonary function tests for workers involved in
foam injection operations, and recommended specific means of controlling air
concentrations of hazards in situations where space constraints made the use of respirators
impractical.
5.6.6 FMC Summary
FMC has a relatively large Santa Clara County workforce, including a large number
of production workers. These workers are exposed to a variety of toxic substances,
including potential carcinogens, solvents, respiratory sensitizers (MDI), and metals.
CAL/OSHA and NIOSH monitoring data disclose instances of high exposure concentrations
over several years, particularly in welding operations. The CAL/OSHA monitoring data is
especially significant in light of the very limited number of actual PEL violations found
by CAL/OSHA in Santa Clara County, in any SIC, between 1979 and 1984. The large
worker population, the use of toxic substances involved, and the history of high exposures
at FMC argue the need for continued scrutiny of worker exposures by FMC and
CAL/OSHA. We did not investigate for this report whether or to what extent FMC has
implemented the NIOSH recommendations contained in the 1984 HHE.
-161-
-------
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations in this report are classified into three categories:
a) Improvement of the available data bases and data collection.
b) High priority industries for further investigation.
c) Research needs in particular industries.
6.1. Recommended Improvements in Data Collection and Use
This subsection contains specific recommendations for adapting existing data gathering
programs in ways which could enhance surveillance of occupational exposure and related
disease outcomes by helping to create viable linkages between them. Suggestions will be
made concerning the utilization of demographic and exposure data.
6.1.1 Demographic Data Recommendations
6.1.1.1 EDD should allow access to "confidential" data.
A cooperative relationship should be initiated between the Employment Development
Department (EDD) and relevant agencies to allow access to an industry-occupation matrix,
along with related growth projections. The ability to use data gathered by EDD is
essential if an adequate occupational health surveillance system is to be developed. We are
not entirely aware of the basis of the EDD confidentiality requirements, i.e., whether they
are required by legislative mandate or are matters of state policy. Whatever the basis of
the requirement, relief should be sought in order that the information be available to other
state agencies. Selection of either the Occupational Employment Survey (OES) survey matrix
or the Census-based matrix should take into consideration the population sub-groups to be
targeted for educational and/or enforcement activities, since the two matrices encompass
different populations. The Census-based matrix includes self-employed persons but excludes
second jobs, while the OES survey includes second jobs but excludes railroad workers,
domestic workers as well as workers in agriculture, education and hospitals.
Such a matrix could be progressively "filled in" as applicable exposure and disease
data are developed. Knowing the proportional occupational breakdown within industries
would help in utilizing data which are by occupation only. Knowing the projected growth
trends would also assist in identifying industries and occupations expected to expand. In
addition to the obvious convenience, a ready-made matrix obtained from EDD would have
several significant advantages over one constructed from other sources: it would be more
accurate, more up-to-date, and more valid at the local level in any California county than
national data bases.
-162-
-------
6.1.1.2. CAL/OSHA should adopt industry ranking approaches.
In addition to computerizing exposure data from compliance inspections, CAL/OSHA
should consider adopting the methods described in the report as one of the bases for
scheduling inspections as well as developing other approaches to scheduling.
6.1.1.3. Hazard Surveillance should be part of DIR and DOHS efforts.
The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Department of Health Services
(DOHS) need to give greater attention to the implementation of hazard and health
surveillance systems. The current system of priority setting which relies on the individual
worker or union for ascertaining if a health hazard exists—while important—is not entirely
satisfactory for priority setting purposes. That is, compliance activity by CAL/OSHA has
historically been driven by employee complaints even in the health area, where workers are
not necessarily knowledgeable about the hazards they face, and where and where
information alone may not suffice.
Relying on worker-initiated complaints or requests is important in the overall attempt
to protect the state's working population; the state also needs to develop a more
sophisticated surveillance system so that scientists and health professionals can use their
expertise to establish occupational health priorities. We propose that the state consider
different approaches to setting occupational health priorities which will be based upon the
implementation of a comprehensive hazard and health surveillance system. These new
approaches would have the effect of broadening the data bases available for surveillance
purposes.
6.1.1.4 Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance Data should be expanded and computerized.
EPA, the State of California, the County of Santa Clara and the local municipalities
need to review the lack of computerization of the information gathered under hazardous
materials ordinances. Passage of local ordinances which provide for collection of
information on the location and use of toxic chemicals represents important legislation, but
failure to implement those rules and lack of computerization render the statutes relatively
useless. Local agencies should ensure all relevant data are collected, such as SIC, to ensure
the data are useful for surveillance purposes. Coordination between the task force
developing the statewide approach and the IEMP is essential.
6.1.1.5 Health outcome data deserves analysis in a separate study.
This report has used information on chemical hazards and exposures to rank industry
for purposes of follow-up. A similar study should be conducted which evaluates
information from health outcome, disease surveillance, epidemiological studies and
injury and illness reporting schemes to rank industries according to their potential
for having occupational health problems. This study would presumably identify
weaknesses in available data bases as well as identifying populations at risk.
Careful attention needs to be given to methods for evaluating anecdotal reports of
illness and injury. An evaluation of health outcome data for Santa Clara County would
focus and narrow the issues to be addressed. Some deficiencies in current data bases
or data sources related to health outcomes are noted in this report (Section 2 and
Appendix 10), and include lack of industry and occupation variables in disease
surveillance systems.
-163-
-------
6.1.2 Exposure Data Recommendations
6.1.2.1 CAL/OSHA should computerize exposure monitoring results.
Inasmuch as CAL-OSHA exposure records represent the only actual measured
exposures on a local level, CAL-OSHA should computerize and tabulate these sampling
results by SIC in a manner similar to and comparable with the OSHA MIS System. The
specific substances encountered and their airborne concentrations should be computerized
by four digit SIC code. In addition, occupation and specific job title information should
be computerized for each sample taken. This represents one of our most important
recommendations and will have implications for research, for targeting .inspections,
special studies and data-based educational efforts. Our inability to obtain CAL-OSHA
exposure information represented one most vexing problem in this study.
6.1.2.2. The number of substances requiring user registration should be expanded.
Consideration should also be given to establishing reporting requirements by industry
for certain specific noncarcinogenic substances. Registration of use is currently required
for regulated carcinogens under the Occupational Cancer Control Act. Additional chemical
agents such as lead, other metals, silica, solvents and other recognized toxic agents should
also require reporting. The list of carcinogens which require reporting should also be
expanded to include chemicals identified by the National Toxicology. Program and the
International Agency for Research on Cancer.
6.1.2.3 CAL/OSHA should obtain employer-collected monitoring data.
CAL/OSHA should consider promulgating standards requiring employers to conduct
environmental monitoring, and where appropriate, biological monitoring for specific agents
with recognized toxicity. CAL/OSHA should collect these data on a periodic basis and
they should be computerized. This information would then form the basis for ongoing
surveillance of chemical hazards. This recommendation is most appropriately implemented
at the statewide level by CAL/OSHA. The Santa Clara County Health Department could
also consider adopting monitoring requirements.
6.2. Highest Priority Industries Recommendations.
The industries found in Table 4-11 are those industries which our approaches to
ranking have identified as having the greatest potential for workplace exposures. These
industries may require further evaluation to assess a) whether significant exposures exist,
b) whether there are health problems associated with workplace exposures, and c) which
agencies and approaches are most appropriate to assess the potential for exposure. In some
instances additional research is required, e.g. the semiconductor industry (SIC 3674),
whereas compliance activity is most appropriate where there is a plausible belief that
excessive exposures are occurring. The data in other tables on industries ranking high in
IBERS, OWI, IRI, and employment are also worthy of review. Finally, the professional
judgement of occupational health professionals in the county will be extremely important
in reviewing these lists. Persons familiar with the industry in the county may be able to
-164-
-------
review these rankings and provide valuable insight regarding research and compliance
priorities.
6.2.1 Small Employers.
There are numerous industries identified in this report which have a history of high
exposures to specific chemicals but which are generally small or which have no fixed
location. Examples include SICs 1611 (Highway and Street Construction), 1761 Roofing
and Sheet Metal Contractors), 3479 (Metal Coating and Allied Services), 3499 (Fabricated
Metal Products), 3544 (Special Dies, Tools, Jigs, and Fixtures), 3679 (Electronic Components
not elsewhere classified), 7216 (Dry Cleaning Plants) and 7699 (Repair Services not
elsewhere classified). All the above industries are in the top 20% of the IBER ranking,
employ over 500 people in Santa Clara County, consist overwhelmingly of firms with under
50 employees, and have over half their total workforce employed in such firms (see also
Table 4-7, and Appendix 4). Those industries with a large total employment base and a
large number of establishments, especially those with no fixed location (e.g. SIC 1761)
require a significantly different approach than a large employer with a single fixed
location. This problem is clearly not unique to Santa Clara county. CAL/OSHA should
consider a meeting or conference on approaches to small industry which would of necessity
include health educators, health care providers to a particular geographic area, industry
and labor representatives, in order to develop a comprehensive strategy on small business.
Our analysis suggests that there have been very high exposures to highly toxic materials
identified in these industries and they identified in firms in these industries and they
should not be excluded because of their size.
6.3. Recommendations for Special Research Related to the Semiconductor Industry (SIC
3674).
6.3.1 Background.
The electronic component manufacturing industry is a focus of our recommendations
for research for the following reasons:
a) The electronics industry is very large in Santa Clara County and it is anticipated
that the industry will continue to grow in the future.
b) The vast majority of other industries in Santa Clara County are amenable to the
intervention and surveillance activities of CAL/OSHA and the County of Santa
Clara. Most of the industries employ many fewer people and the problems are
reasonably well recognized.
c) The electronics industry has the potential to be a model of preventive
occupational health practice which could affect the development of occupational
health programs in other newly developing or rebuilding industries. Some of the
approaches taken already by the larger industries represent important innovations
in occupational health management.
-165-
-------
d) As a rapidly changing industry with a high degree of technological innovation
there is always the concern that new techniques for manufacturing may have the
potential for significant health problems. Constant surveillance and research
therefore is an important element in assessing potential problems.
e) There is oft expressed public concern about the potential for accidents and
numerous anecdotal reports of illness, especially associated with solvent exposure,
acid and base exposure, arsenic exposure, toxic gas use, epoxy resins and
cellosolves in the electronics industry. There have been particular concerns raised
around reproductive toxicity. In our view, there need to be hazard and illness
surveillance systems established which address these concerns and anecdotal
reports. Further research to assess the scope and magnitude of these potential
problems is appropriate. The development of this industrial base is very
important to the county and significant effort needs to occur to develop the most
progressive approaches to hazard control such that public and worker concerns
are addressed and that existing problems are dealt with systematically in both the
short and long term.
6.3.2 Semiconductor Industry Recommendations.
6.3.2.1 The county health department should attempt to initiate epidemiologicai
studies of the semiconductor industry, perhaps in cooperation with health
care providers or appropriate federal and state agencies.
Epidemiologicai studies designed to assess the risks due to chemical exposure in
electronics industry SICs, perhaps in cooperation with Kaiser or other health care providers
should be considered. The County may wish to request research studies from NIOSH, the
Occupational Health Centers or the Department of Health Services. From an epidemiologic
standpoint there is little to no data available on the problems facing workers in these
industries.
6.3.2.2 Neurobehavioral screening should be used to assess solvent exposure effects.
Neurobehavioral screening studies designed to assess the impact of solvent exposure on
the central nervous system in solvent exposed workers should be considered. We received
numerous anecdotal reports from physicians, industrial hygienists and workers themselves
on neurobehavioral problems associated with solvent exposure. Since exposure levels are
generally well within standards in these industries, there is concern that current standards
may be inadequate or that significant dermal exposure may be occurring. Numerous
industries throughout the U.S. have solvent exposure problems and therefore the selection
of the most appropriate cohort is an important methodological issue. In our view,
neurotoxicology and neuroepidemiblogy of the solvents used in these industries represents
an important, unresolved research issue.
6.3.2.3 The county should research means of addressing chemical burns in the industry.
Chemical burns account for a significant proportion of physicians' first reports of
injury in this industry. Further research on the control, minimization, and treatment of
-166-
-------
chemical burns should be an area of follow-up by the county.
6.3.2.4 Biological monitoring requirements should be considered for this industry.
Review of the chemicals used in the industry should be conducted for the express
purpose of identifying whether any biological monitoring requirements should be considered
specifically for this industry.
6.3.2.5 Toxicological mechanisms of Cellosolve solvents and exposure levels of these
solvents in the semiconductor industry require further study.
Cellosolve solvents used in the industry have raised concerns among electronics
workers and their advocates. The reproductive toxicity of "cellosolves" does not appear to
derive from mutagenicity or other irreversible biological processes. Further research by
NIOSH needs to be conducted on the mechanism of the reproductive toxicity of these
compounds with particular attention being given to the establishment of safe levels of
exposure. In this regard, additional characterization of exposure levels in this industry is
appropriate. A joint effort between .NIOSH, CAL/OSHA and the County would be
conducted. The cellosolves have low vapor pressures, and therefore attention should be
focused on the prevention of skin contact. Substitution of a less toxic solvent would be an
appropriate, even preferred, approach to the control of Cellosolve exposure. If it is
determined that substitution is not viable, then the State of California needs to consider
how to address reproductive toxins especially as a matter of policy. There are currently no
guidelines at the state or federal level on approaches to the regulation of reproductive
toxins.
6.3.2.6 Assiduous exposure monitoring is critical and should include maintenance, cleanup,
and repair operations.
Our recommendations for the requirement for environmental monitoring with
subsequent reporting and computerization by state or local agencies of the data are
appropriate to certain chemicals in use in these industries, e.g., arsenic, cellosolves and
other solvents. Monitoring of exposures during maintenance, cleanup, and repair operations
is particularly relevant. This would appear to be especially true in a highly complex
industry of this type where acute exposures are possible during equipment failure.
Continuous monitoring of arsenic levels would appear to be a high priority.
6.3.2.7 Research into toxic exposures from ion-implantation processes should
continue.
Ion-implantation processes also require further research of the type described by
Ungers et al. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 46(8), 416-420 (1985).
6.3.2.8 Santa Clara County should address anecdotal reports of illness in the industry.
Exposure levels to toxic chemicals in these industries tend to be very low when they
are measured, but nonetheless there are numerous anecdotal reports of illness. There
have been often stated concerns that acute exposures during accidental releases may
have had important health consequences. We recommend the Santa Clara Department of
-167-
-------
Health take the lead role in evaluating the existence and severity of these reports.
The County should attempt to involve the clinical community in the County, including
the occupational medicine clinic of the Valley Medical Center. Health care providers
represent an important resource for identification and clinical evaluation of illness;
in IEMP Phase 2, a concerted effort should be made to involve this important segment
of the Community. Representatives from industry, the Santa Clara Department of Health,
health care providers, and NIOSH should develop a mechanism for tracking possible work
related complaints to confirm the accuracy of the anecdotal reports.
6.3.2.9 Industry and local agencies must continue to assess the potential for catastrophic
accidents.
An assessment of the potential for catastrophic events associated with toxic chemical
explosions, leaks or spills is not within the scope of this report. However, the issue of
chemical storage, chemical use (amounts), emergency response planning, and other related
issues should be the focus of further study. We were impressed with the efforts of some
of the large electronics employers in the county in this area, but we believe a
comprehensive evaluation including both large and small employers is important.
-168-
-------
APPENDIX 1
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING METHODS
Monitoring for Participates
Paniculate sampling consists of measuring the airborne concentrations of
dusts (0.1-1000 um or microns), fumes (0.0001 um), and smokes (0.01-2 um), and of liquid
aerosols (droplets suspended in air). Aerosols are differentiated according to particle size
and generally are described according to their aerodynamic diameter. Dusts are formed
from solid materials by smokes are products of incomplete combustion of organic materials,
crushing , grinding, etc., and fumes result from processes such as evaporation, sublimation
and condensation. In general, aerosol sampling strategies are dependent upon the nature of
the paniculate. Substances which exert their effects deep in the lung, such as crystalline
silica, are sampled using techniques which identify the respirable fraction (<10 m),
whereas other substances are measured for total dust concentration.
Paniculate collection devices can be grouped into five categories: 1) settling
chambers; 2) centrifugal devices; 3) impingers and impactors; 4) filters; 5) electrostatic
precipitators and thermal precipitators. Settling chambers are used for grab samples,
whereby air is trapped in a container, and the particles are allowed to settle onto glass
slides for microscopic inspection. Centrifugal devices consist of conical or helical devices,
known as "cyclones" or curved surface traps, through which air is pumped and the partic-
ulates removed by centrifugal force. This technique separates the respirable paniculate
from the large paniculate. The cyclone is generally used for silica and coal mine dust
sampling. Impingers and impactors take advantage of the inertial property of particulates.
Impingers remove particulates by bubbling an air flow through water, while impactors use
sudden changes in the direction of air flow to 'drop' particulates on a flat surface.
"Cascade impactors" pump air through a series of plates to separate particulates by size.
Impactors are used to characterize the size distribution of a particular aerosol.
Filters are one of the best and most common of paniculate sampling methods. A
variety of filters made from materials such as paper, cellulose, and glass fiber, can be used
depending on the kind of paniculate sample. Air is pumped through the filters and the
particulates thus trapped are weighed to determine mass concentrations (either total or
respirable).
In electrostatic precipitators. an airstream is passed through an electrically charged field,
and the subsequently charged particulates are attracted to a collecting electrode. Thermnl
precipitation removes particles from an airstream by passing it through a channel having a
significant temperature change perpendicular to the direction of flow. The particles move
toward decreasing temperatures and are deposited on a collecting surface.
Monitoring for Gases and Vapors
Different methods are used for grab samples and integrated samples. Grab snmcle?
are usually collected when analysis is .to be performed on gross amounts of gases in air
(such as methane, carbon monoxide, oxygen, and carbon dioxide) or when peak concentra-
tions are sought. The development of highly sensitive laboratory instruments, however, has
extended the use of grab sampling to low levels of contaminants as well.
A-l
-------
Devices used to take grab samples include vacuum flasks, gas or liquid displacement
collectors, metallic or glass collectors, syringes and plastic bags. Vacuum flasks are
evacuated heavy walled containers which can be filled with the air sample by breaking a
sealed entry to the container and then resealing it with wax or other material. In dis-
placement containers, the original air is replaced by the sample through pumping, or water
is drained out of a container to draw in an air sample. Water displacement cannot be
used for soluble gases. Flexible plastic bags can simply be pumped full of air, can take
very large samples and have the further advantages of being light, non-breakable, inexpen-
sive to ship and easy to use.
Integrated sampling of the workroom atmosphere is used when an 8-hour, time
weighted average of an exposure has to be calculated, when the composition of the air is
not uniform, or when the sensitivity requirements of the method of analysis need an
extended sampling period. Integrated samples can be collected by pumping air through an
absorbant solution or over an adsorbent surface, which will capture the contaminant and
later be sent to a laboratory for analysis, or by passive adsorbent devices (worn as badges)
which come into contact with the contaminated air through simple diffusion. The latter
are always personal sampling devices, whereas the former can be either stationary area
sampling devices, or personal sampling devices worn by the worker.
The integrated sampling method which consists of retaining gases and vapors on acti-
vated charcoal is by far the most widespread. Use of small charcoal tubes connected to a
small portable pump (active sampling) was introduced in 1970. In 1976 it was shown that
a layer of charcoal placed in a badge and exposed to a solvent vapor can collect the vapor
by diffusion through air or through a plastic membrane (passive sampling). Both methods
are very simple and-convenient to use for personal sampling but have their own advan-
tages and disadvantages.
The pump constitutes a significant source of error and of disturbance, and active
sampling requires frequent checks of the flow rate. A major advantage of this method
over passive sampling is the flexibility gained in the choice of an appropriate sampling
time. Even short periods are possible because the analytical sensitivity does not represent
a major limitation, since the flow rate of the pump may be increased if needed.
Badges however do not have such flexibility, their "-flow rate" being determined by
the diffusion coefficient through the layer in front of the charcoal (air or plastic mem-
brane). It corresponds to very low flow rates, which render the badges inconvenien-t for
short-term sampling. However their small size, their easy manipulation, and the absence of
a pump represent important advantages and make this sampling method very attractive.
Some substances such as amines are not easily removed from the charcoal (or silica
gel) so another adsorbant has to be used. Also inorganic compounds such as ozone, nitrogen
dioxide, chlorine, hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide react chemically with the activated
charcoal and thus must be collected with silica gel or another absorbant. Silica gel works
well with many gases and vapors but due to its polar character will absorb water preferen-
tially to comparatively less polar organic compounds. Thus if the air has a high moisture
content and the sampling is continued long enough, water will displace the organic sol-
vents.
When a gas or vapor may be altered by collecting it in a liquid or when adsorption
is difficult, a condensation method can be used. Vapors or gases are separated from
sampled air by passing the air through a coil immersed in a cooling medium, dry ice and
acetone, liquid air, or liquid nitrogen. This is not ordinarily a portable field technique.
A-2
-------
In addition to the instantaneous and integrated sampling techniques described above,
gases and vapors can be monitored with direct reading methods. A direct reading instru-
ment takes in a sample of air, makes a quantitative analysis, and displays the results on a
dial or digital reading, on a stripchart recording, or on a tape printout. Direct reading
instruments have the advantage of giving instantaneous readings of airborne concentration
with a high degree of accuracy. They are useful for a quick evaluation of the workplace
situation rather than an assessment of worker exposure. Because of the size and complex-
ity of the equipment, its usefulness is limited in measuring worker exposure.
Another direct reading technique is the use of colorimetric indicator tubes. The
colorimetric indicator tube contains solid reagent chemicals that react with substances in
the air drawn through them, producing a color change. In most cases, a fixed volume of
sample is pumped through the tube and the length of the stain is measured against a cali-
bration scale which is printed directly on the tube or on a chart. The early detector tubes
were made for carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and benzene, but now more than 400
different types are available. A commonly used indicator tube is marketed by Draeger,
and hence the so-called "Drae"»r tube." These indicator tubes provide compact direcr
reading devices that are convenient to use for detection and semiquantitative estimation of
gases and vapors in a work atmosphere. Unfortunately, the accuracy of the indicator tube
is very limited. Certified detector tubes are accurate to 35% at 1/2 the TLV They are
therefore useful for assessing whether there is a problem or not. If the measured concen-
tration is 25% of the standard, the detector tube is of little value.
Analytic Techniques
There are a variety of analytic methods for analyzing air samples. Particulate
samples are generally simply weighed (gravimetric analysis), and exposure calculated based
on the time and air flow used in obtaining the sample. The result is expressed as mass of
particulate in volume of air, e.g. milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m').
Analysis of gas or vapor samples is much more complex, and can involve highly soph-
isticated techniques such as gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrophotometry.
Results are usually expressed as parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb).
Detailed descriptions can be obtained from the APHA Intersociety Committee's Methods of
Air Sampling and Analysis.' '
References
1. Katz, Morris, ed.. Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis.
American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1977.
A-3
-------
APPENDIX 2
EXAMPLES OF BIOLOGICAL MONITORING
This appendix gives examples of biological monitoring techniques for some chemicals
commonly used in Santa Clara County industry, in order to convey a better understanding
of biological monitoring.
Solvents
Benzene, absorbed primarily through inhalation of vapors and secondarily through
skin contact, produces both acute and chronic toxic effects in those exposed. Acute effects
include central nervous system depression and myocardial sensitization to adrenalin; chronic
exposure can cause aplastic anemia (Levy & Wegman, 367). The recommended threshold
limit value for benzene in the workplace is currently lOppm (30mg/m^). The most
frequently analyzed specimen for benzene exposure is urine, where phenol, the major meta-
bolite of benzene, is measured. Concentrations higher than 75mg/L indicate exposure to
benzene higher than the lOppm TLV (Baselt, 38). It is also reported, however, that phenol
concentrations in urine following a 6 hour exposure to benzene at lOppm are around
40mg/L.
The measurement of benzene in blood has been studied very little. Evaluation of
expired air suggests it may be a more sensitive method for monitoring very low atmo-
spheric concentrations. Sampling during the work period represents exposure at that time,
while sampling breath in the morning following exposure reflects the integrated exposure
during the preceding day.
Urine analysis for phenol is accomplished using colorimetry and gas chromatography
Blood and breath samples can be analyzed with gas chromatography.
Toluene, another solvent, has acute toxic effects similar to benzene (symptoms can
include headaches, nausea, lassitude, impaired coordination and memory loss), but appar-
ently not the chronic toxicity of benzene (Baselt, 254). The current threshold limit value is
lOOppm (375 mg/m^). Assessment of exposure is normally done through urine analysis for
toluene's primary metabolite, hippuric acid. This is only useful, however, for moderate to
heavy exposure due to the high and variable levels of endogenous hippuric acid. Exposure
to lOOppm over one shift has produced urinary concentrations from 2.8 - 4g/L, depending
on the analytic technique used. Blood and breath concentrations of toluene correlate well
to atmospheric concentrations in subjects at rest, but vary too widely with physical activity
to be currently useful in industrial biological monitoring. Gas chromatography and ultra-
violet spectrophotometry can both be used in the analysis for hippuric acid in urine,
depending on the degree of specificity required, while gas chromatography is commonly
used for blood or breath analysis.
Xylene is similar to toluene in toxicity, and is well absorbed both through inhalation
and skin contact. Its current threshold limit value is lOOppm (435 mg/m3). Biological
monitoring for xylene involves sampling urine for m-methyl hippuric acid, a metabolite
whose concentration also appears to correlate well with atmospheric xylene concentrations.
Urine concentrations of this metabolite, following a 4 hour lOppm exposure averaged 2.6
8/L (Baselt, 287). Breath and blood analysis for xylene, while feasible, has not yet been
A-4
-------
implemented in industrial biological monitoring. Analytic techniques for evaluation of
xylene exposure are the same as those for toluene.
Another group of solvents is the halogenated hydrocarbons, represented in Santa Clara
County Industry by compounds such as dichloromethane (methylene chloride), trichloroethy-
lene (TCE) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA, also methyl chloroform). All three solvents
affect the central nervous system in ways similar to the other solvents discussed. In
addition, dichloromethane leads to high carbon monoxide accumulation in vivo (Lauwerys,
82-3), while TCE and TCA have been shown to cause liver and kidney damage in abusers
of the chemical compounds, plus electrocardiographic changes in chronically exposed work-
ers (Baselt, 258, 262).
Dichloromethane exposure may be monitored by the analysis of the substance itself in
blood or breath, or its metabolite, carbon monoxide, in the blood. Blood concentrations of
dichloromethane should not exceed 2mg/L to correlate with the current atmospheric 200ppm
threshold limit value, while blood carboxyhemoglobin saturation (a product of elevated CO
levels) should not exceed 5% (Baselt, 113). Trichloroethylene is mostly metabolized to
trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid, which are excreted in the urine, but due to high
individual variation in metabolism and the fact that other chemicals produce the same
metabolites in persons exposed, urine analysis has not been a successful monitoring tech-
nique for this compound. Expired air concentrations have been shown to correlate fairly
well with atmospheric concentrations; they should therefore not exceed Ippm to keep expo-
sure within the atmospheric threshold limit value of lOOppm (Baselt, 262).
Good correlations between biological samples and atmospheric samples seem to exist
for blood, breath and urine analysis of trichloroethane, but none of these methods is
presently favored. An upper limit 150ppm for expired air has been proposed to prevent
exposure greater than that allowed by the current atmospheric average 8 hour level of
350ppm (1900 mg/m3).
Inorganic contaminants
Arsenic exposure can be found in the occupational environment in industries such as
pesticides, metallurgy, ceramic and glass, Pharmaceuticals and manufacture of semiconduc-
tors in the electronics industry. Epidemiological studies suggest that chronic arsenic
exposure can lead to cardiovascular and neurological abnormalities, in addition to respira-
tory and skin cancers. Inhalation of arsine gas can result in massive hemolysis leading to
renal failure and rapid death (Baselt, 30). Levels of organo-arsenic compounds can be
measured in the urine to monitor for arsenic exposure. Hair analysis has also been used
for assessment of exposure, but it is not frequently employed as it can easily be contami-
nated by externally deposited arsenic. Analysis of biological specimens for arsenic concen-
trations involves wet or dry ashing of the organic matter, followed by a colorimetric
technique or atomic absorption spectrometry. There are no biological monitoring require-
ments in the CAL/OSHA arsenic standard.
Cadmium, found in metal plating and metallurgical industries, has been shown to
cause renal damage (Baselt, 53) and is considered a carcinogen by IARC. Urine cadmium
levels can be used to monitor chronic exposure to the metal, while blood concentrations
offer a better index to recent exposure and acute intoxication. Urine or blood concentra-
tions higher than 0.005 mg/L indicate excessive exposure (Baselt, 54). Atomic absorption
spectrometry is used in the lab analysis of specimens.
A-5
-------
Lead, a metal found in a variety of industries such as paints, storage batteries,
insecticides and ceramics, can be monitored in the body both directly as lead, and indi-
rectly, through measurement of a physiological change in heme synthesis. Because lead is
highly destructive to heme synthesis, increased levels of heme precursors can be measured
in the urine. Whole blood assays for lead are required by the CAL/OSHA lead standard.
References
Baselt, Randall C., Biological Methods of Industrial Monitorine.
Biomedical Publications, Davis, California, 1980
Lauwerys, Robert R., Industrial Chemical Exposure: Guidelines
for Biological Monitoring. Biomedical Publications, Davis
California, 1983
A-6
-------
3204:
Access to Employee
Exposure and Medical
Records
3220:
Emergency Action Plan
Appendix 3.1
Key CAL/OSHA Standards Applicable to this Report
CAL/OSHA occupational health standards are found in Title 8
of the California Administrative Code, under General
Industry Safety Orders (GISO's). Standards are referred to
by Title 8 Section number (also known as GISO number).
Standard (GISO #J_
Section 3203:
Accident Prevention
Program
Components of Standard
Employers must implement an Accident
Prevention Program to include training
workers in both general and
specific safe work practices, and
regular periodic inspections of the
workplace for discovery and cor-
rection of unsafe conditions
and work practices.
Employees are provided a right
of access to relevant
exposure and medical records.
These records include past
and present exposres to toxic
substances or harmful
physical agents, other
employees records with similar
duties or working conditions,
records containing exposure
information on the worker
workplace(s) ; and, MSDSs.
This is deemed necessary in
order to improve the detection
treatment and prevention of
occupational disease.
Employers are required to
develop and train workers in
an emergency action plan
which includes procedures for
reporting fires and other
emergencies, escape routes.
alarm systems, an evacuation
plan, personnel assigned to
rescue and medical duties and
emergency procedures.
A-7
-------
Standard (GISO »)
3221:
Fire Prevention Plan
5139-5155:
Control of
Substances
Hazardous
-2-
Key Components of Standard
Employers must have in writing a fire
prevention plan that identifies
potential fire hazards and proper
handling and storage procedures.
The plan must designate employees
responsible for the maintenance of
fire prevention/control equipment
and systems, and those reponsible for
the control of flammable or combustible
waste. The employer must review with
each worker those aspects of the
plan relevant to the workers assignment.
This group of standards requires
employers in specific industries where
dusts, fumes, mists, vapors and gases are
harmful by-products of production to
control exposures through the use of
specific control technologies, including
ventilation systems and personal
protective equipment. Sections
provide regulations for respirator
protective equipment, exhaust emission
control and oxygen deficiency.
Hazard over-exposures are cited under
Sections 5141 or 5155, depending on
the nature of the situation.
Under section 5155, airborne contaminants
permissible exposure limits (PELs) are
established for airborne concentrations
of substances to indicate the amounts
of a substance to which most workers
can have daily exposure for a life-
time without suffering ill effects.
Section 5155 gives PELs for 574 airborne
contaminants.
Appendix 3.2 shows health effects for some
representative air contaminants that are
relevant to industries covered in this
report. Appendix 3.3 is a reproduction of
the entire section 5155.
A-i
-------
Standard
Section 51A4:
Respiratory Protection
Program
5160-5185:
Hot, flammable, poisonous,
corrosive and irritant
substances
5194:
Material Safety Data Sheets
5216: Lead
-3-
Components of Standard
When respiratory protection is
used in controlling exposures,
written operation procedures governing
the selection and use of respirators
must be established and must include
procedures for selection, instruction
and training, cleaning and sanitizing,
inspection and maintenance.
These sections set up minimum standards
for the use, handling and storage of
hot flammable poisonous corrosive and
irritant substances in all places of
employment except laboratories and city
gas systems.
Each employer must have on hand, from the
manufacturer, producer or seller of each
hazardous substance that is used in the
workplace, a MSDS. This document pro-
vides pertinent information and a profile
of the particular hazardous substance
or mixture. It is required that the
MSDSs be available to employees and that
employees be made aware of the presence
of hazardous substances in the workplace.
Employers are required to reduce air lead
levels to an action level of 30 ug/m^
and a PEL of 50 ug/m . Exposure levels
are to be monitored through blood lead
and air levels; respirator requirements,
work practices and engineering controls
are employed for control.
A-9
-------
Standards Relating to
Carcinogens:
5208: Asbestos
5209: Carcinogens Regulations
(13 substances)
5210 Vinyl Chloride
5212: DBCP
5213: Acrylonitrile
5214: Inorganic Arsenic
5215: MOCA
5219: EDB
5220: Ethylene Oxide
-4-
Key Components of Standard
The following standards regulate
carcinogens. These standards are
much more detailed than the
Airborne Contaminants Standard
(GISO 5155). The standards
require registration with the
California Department of Industrial
Relations, and set forth pro-
visions for medical surveillance
and monitoring, record keeping,
engineering controls and proper
work practices. Appendix 3.4
shows major industrial uses
of regulated carcinogens, and the
permissible exposures defined
under the respective standards.
A-10
-------
Health
Appendix 3.2
Effects of Selected Substances Regulated
"by GISO 5155 (Airborne Contaminants)
Category/
Substance
Solvents:
Toluene
Xylene
Benzene
MEK
(methyl
ethyl
ketone)
MIBK
(methyl
n-butyl
ketone)
Acetone
Freon
(Fluoro-
carbon
113)
TCE
(trich-
loro-
ethylene)
Occupation
Industry,
Operation
Organic chemical
mfg., fuel compo-
nent, paint
ingredient
Wide variety of uses
as solvent; ingred. in
paints, lacquers,
varnishes, adhesives,
intermediate in
organic chemical mfg.
Mfg. of organic com-
pounds, detergents,
pesticides, paint
remover
Wide variety of uses
as a solvent; Inter-
mediate in organic
chemical mfg.
Wide variety of uses
as a solvent; inter-
mediate in organic
chemical mfg.
Wide variety of uses
as a solvent; inter-
mediate in organic
chemical mfg.
Solvent for cleaning
electrical equipment
and degreasing
machinery
Metal degreasing, dry
cleaning, paint ingre-
dient; electronics
industry
Some Health
Effects
CNS depression,
irritant,
dermatitis
Pneumonitis, acute
pulmonary edema,
irritation, CNS
depression
CNS depression,
leukemia ,
dermatitis
Narcosis,
dermatitis
Linked with peri-
pheral neuropathy
Narcosis, dermatitis
Found to be
cardiotoxic to
dogs, monkeys
PEL0
Sb 100 ppmc
S 100 ppm
S 10 ppm
200 ppm
5 ppm
750 ppm
1000 ppm
CNS depression 25 ppm
Peripheral and cranial
neuropathy
A-ll
-------
-2-
Category/
Substance
Solvents:
(TCA) 1,1,1 -
Trichloro-
ethane
Cellosolves
(glycol ethers)
ethylene glycol/
monoethyl ether
ethylene glycol
monoethyl/acetate
me thy1-and butyl-
substituted com-
pounds such as
ethylene glycol
monomethyl ether
(contained in
epoxy resins)
Occupational,
Industry,
Operation
Degreaser, electronics
industry
Dry cleaning, plastic,
ink, and lacquer manu-
facturing, textile
dying, photoresist
processes in *
electronic industry.
Some Health PEL
Effects
Anesthetic effects, 350 ppm
central nervous
system
Fatigue, lethargy, S 50 ppm
renal failure,
chemical hepati-
tis, reproductive
effects.
S 25 ppm
Carbon disulfide
Methylene
chloride
Perchloro-
ethylene
Methanol
Gases :
Ammon ia
Chemical laboratories
as a solvent for lipids,
halogens rubber; mfg. of
organic chemicals; vis-
cose rayon
Aerosol packaging; anes-
thetic makers: paint
removal; varnishes and
stains
Electronics industry,
dry cleaning
Electronics industry,
formaldehyde produc-
tion, paints
Agriculture,
fertilizers
Parkinsonism, S 10 ppm
psychosis-.chronic
nephritic and
nephrotic
syndromes
Metabolized to 100 ppm
carbon monoxide:
reduction in car-
diac output (acute);
may accelerate
atherosclerosis .
(chronic)
CMS depression 50 ppn
Metabolic acidosis. 200 ppra
optic nerve damage
and blindness
Upper respiratory 25
irritation
A-12
-------
-3-
Category/
Substance
Gases;
Carbon monoxide
Occupation
Industry,
Operation
Garages, filling
stations
Some Health PEL
Effects
Diisocyanates
(TDI, MDI)
Epichlorohydrin
(contained in
epoxy resins)
Fluorine
Formaldehyde
Polyurethane foam,
textiles
Adhesives, laminating
plastics, electronics
industry
Uranium processing,
aerospace, welding
Disinfectants, germi-
cides, textiles, film
developing, hospitals
Hydrogen chloride Electroplating, metal
treatment, production of
chlorinated organic
chemicals
Hydrogen cyanide Electroplating, bronzing,
photography, electronics
industry
Phosphoric acid
Sulfuric acid
Phosphine
Diborane
Dentistry, semiconductor
industry
Fertilizers, chemicals,
plastics, electronic
component industry
Semiconductor industry
Reduction in 50 ppm
cardiac output
(acute); may acce-
lerate athero-
sclerosis
(chronic).
Asthmatic reaction 0.02 ppm
Skin sensitizers 2 ppm
Laryngeal spasm 1 ppm
bronchospasm
Primary irritant, 2 ppm
irritation of mucous
membranes of the nose,
URT and eyes.
tooth corrosion 5 ppm
Enzyme inhibition 10 ppm
with metabolic
asphyxia and death
Primary irritant 1 mg/m
3d
Irritant, burns 1 mg/m3
Numbness of fingers 0.3 ppm
(acute exposure)
Chronic hepatitis 0.1 ppm
following acute
exposure
A-13
-------
-4-
Category/
Substance
Gases:
Arsine
Silane
Occupation
Industry ,
Operation
Semiconductor industry
Some Health
Effects
Intravascular
hemolysis, hemo-
lysis , hemoglo-
binuria, jaundice
PEL
0.05 ppm
Skin and mucous 5 ppm
membranes
irritant
Dusts, Fumes, Mists;
Beryllium
Chromium
Cadmium
Manganese fume
Mercury alky Is,
as Hg
Nickel
Silica
Aluminum
welding fumes
Automotive, computers,
electronics, aerospace
Solder for aluminum,
photography
Electroplating, process
engraving, welding
Dry cell batteries,
ceramics, paints
Electronics industry,
pesticides, chemical
and medical labs
Electroplating, nickel-
cadmium batteries,
welding
Glass, electronics
industry, sandblasting
masonry, ceramics
Welding
Granulomatosis 0.002 mg/ji3
and fibrosis of
lung
Lung cancer
Pulmonary edema
(acute)
Emphysema
(chronic)
Irritability,
memory impair-
ment
Dermatitis ,
sensorimotor
changes,
tremor
Sensitization
dermatitis,
lung cancer
0.5 mg/m3
0.05 mg/a3
mg/ai3
S 0.001 ppm
mg/m3
Zinc oxide fume Welding
Pneumoconiosis 20 o ppcf
Metal fume fever 5 mg/:n3
Metal fume fever 5 m g /13
A-14
-------
-5-
Category/
Substance
Occupational
Industry,
Operation
Some Health
Effects
PEL
Inorganic Acids and Bases:
Chromium Trioxide) Metallurgy, chromium
(chronic acid) ) plating, electronics
) industry, chemical
) and medical labs,
) fertilizer production
Hydrochloric Acid)
Hydrofloric Acid)
Nitric Acid )
Sodium Hydroxide )
Potassium Hydroxide
Burns, eye damage 0.1 mg/m
respiratory tract
damage
5 ppm
3 ppm
2 ppm
2 mg/m3
2 mg/m
3
A-15
-------
-6-
Category/
Substance
Pesticides:
Organo-
phosphates:
Parathion
Malathion
Carbamates:
Carbaryl
Chlorinated
Hydrocarbons
Aldrin
Dieldrin
Chlordane
DDT
Occupational
Industry,
Operation
Some Health
Effects
PEL
Workers who manufacture,
formulate, warehouse
store, ship and trans-
port; applicators, mixers,
loaders, irrigators and
farm workers.
Convulsions ,
coma, death
S
S
(with long-
term expo-
sure)
CNS depression S
with tremors,
convulsions S
and respira-
tory failure S
0.1 mg/m3
10 mg/m3
5 mg/m3
0.25 mg/a3
0.25 mg/m3
0.5 mg/m3
1
Biphenyls:
Paraquat
Diquat
Irritation
of eyes, nos-e
throat and
skin; heart,
liver, lung
damage on
ingestion .
0 . 1 mg/m3
0.5 mg/m3
a. CAL/OSHA permissible exposure limit as of Sept. 1984.
b. May be absorbed into the bloodstream through the skin,
mucous membranes, or eyes.
c. Parts of contaminant per million parts air.
d. Milligrams of contaminant per cubic foot of air.
e. Millions of particles per cubic foot of air.
A-16
-------
APPENDIX 3.3
General Industry Safety Order 5155
Title 8 California Administrative Code
General Industry Safety Order S1SS establishes
exposure limits for controlling worker exposure
to 574 airborne contaminants.
PREFACE
Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) are established for
airborne concentrations of substances to indicate the conditions
and amounts of a substance to which most workers can have daily
exposure for a lifetime without suffering ill effects.
PELs are based on current information from industrial
experience and research involving animals and humans. In some
Ci.ses a PEL is established to protect against illness or disease,
and in others it is established to protect against irritation,
narcosis, nuisance or other forms of stress.
PELs tpply only to occupational settings and occupational
exposures and are best measured and interpreted by an industrial
hygienist. PELs are not intended to: indicate the hazard or
toxicity of a substance; to be used in estimating the toxic
potential of continuous uninterrupted exposures or other extended
work periods; or as proof or disproof of an existing disease
or physical condition.
Employers are required by law to ensure that employees are
not exposed to airborne concentrations of substances above the
PLLs, however, an accidental or short-term overexposure will
not necessarily produce adverse health effects. The best practice
is to maintain concentrations of all airborne contaminants below
the PEL to as low a level as possible.
A-17
-------
CO
It is also possible that very sensitive individuals ••/
experience disconfort or become ill when they are exposed to a
substance at concentrations at or below the PEL, or such an
exposure Bay aggravate a pre-existing health condition.
You cannot trust your senses to tell you when you are being
exposed above the PEL. Many substances have no odor yet are very
dangerous.while others Bay be easy to snell even at low, safe
levels. Only a trained person, such as an industrial hygienist,
using Monitoring equipnent can accurately Measure the airborne
levels of i substance.
Please read pages 3-5 carefully for an understanding of
the tables contained in GISO S1SS.
Many substances rarely used in industrial processes do not
appear in GISO S1SS because they are either not toxic or there is
not sufficient information about a substance to warrant establishing
a PEL for it. Other CAL/OSHA regulations have been established for
substances identified as occupational carcinogens; see General
Industry Safety Orders 5208-5215 and 5217-S219. These carcinogens
and the substances listed in GISO S1S5 are subject to the
requirements of GISO S194 concerning employee training and
information and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) and of GISO 1204
concerning employee access to medical and exposure records.
If you have any questions regarding these regulations, contact
the nearest office of either the CAL/OSHA Consultation .Service or
•^f Division of Occupational Safety and Health.
If you have any questions about the health effects of exposure
to any of the substances listed in this booklet or of any toxic
substance, contact the Hazard Evaluation System and Information
Service (HESIS) by phone fro» 8 a.m. - S p.m. Monday through Friday
at 415-540-1014 (collect calls are accepted), or in writing to:
HESIS, 21S1 Berkeley Hay, Berkeley, CA 94704.
To obtain an order blank for ordering the General Industry
Safety Orders and other sections of Title 8, or to obtain publications
regarding the safe handling of toxic substances in the workplace,
contact CAL/OSHA Couunications: S2S Golden Gate Ave. - 3rd Floor,
San Francisco, CA 94102; 415- 5S7-2237.
TITLES CrNKHAl. INLH'STrn SAFETY OHDtHS $ 5155
{R.gilKr U. No »*—a-2O-U) (p 432.259)
5155. Airborne Contaminants.
(a) Scope and Application
(I) This section establishes requirements for controlling employee exposure
to ,ui home coiiLimin. nits and skin coi.lacl uilli those substances which are
reachl) absorbed through the skin and are designated by the "S" notation in
Tables ACM and AC-2, at all places of employment in the itale.
(2.i When this section references another section for controlling employee
exposures to a particular airborne contaminant, the provisions of this section for
such substance shall apply only lo ihos1 places of employment which are ex-
empt from the other standard.
NOTK Tables AC-I. AC2 and AC-3 of this section present concentration limits for
airborne contaminants lo which nearl> all uoikers mav be exposed dail) during a 40 hour
workweek fur a uoikmK lifetime without adverse effect Because of some variation in
individual susceplibililv. an occasional worker niav suffer discomfort, aggravation of a
pre eustmg condiliun, 01 occupational disease upon exposure lo concentrations even
below the v allies specified in these tables The enposure limits established bv this section
retire I current medical opinion and industrial hv giene practice, doubts being resolved on
the side of safelv. and aie intended lo be used u> accordance with good industrial hvgiene
practice bv qualified persons The Division recognises the need for almost continuous
review of these concentration limits and also anticipates the need for including new or
additional substances Consequent!), the Division, as authorized b) Labor Code Section
(kit 151 h) el sec) . mavrequire an emplover lo control harmful exposures lo atmospheric
contaminants which are not included in this section
(b) Definitions Ceiling Limit. The maximum concentration of an air-
borne contaminant lo which an employee may be exposed at any time
tight-Hour Time-Weighted Average Concentration (TWA). An em-
ployee's exposure, as measured or calculated by the formula in Appendix A, to
an airborne contaminant during a workday
Kxcursion Duration Maximum lime period permitted for an exposure
above the excursion limit but not exceeding the ceiling limit.
Kxcursion Limit The maximum concentration of an airborne contaminant
appearing in Table AC-2 lo which an employee may be exposed without regard
lo duration prov ided (he eight-hour time-weighted average concentration does
nol exceed the permissible exposure limit
Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL). The maximum permitted 8-hour time-
weighted average concentration of an airborne contaminant
(c> Exposure Limits
M) Permissible Exposure Limits (PEI.s)
(Ai An employee exposure to an airborne contaminant in a workday, ex-
pressed as 8-hour TU'A concentration, shall nol exceed the PEL specified for
the substance in Table AC-1, AC 2. or AC 3
(hi When substances have additive health effects as described in Appendix
11, the value of D shall nol exceed unity
(2) Short Term Limits
(Ai Table' AC-2 Substances Emplovee exposure shall be controlled such
thai the duration of exposure at any concentration above I he excursion limit but
nol exceeding the ceiling limit is no grealei than the specified excursion dura-
tion
-------
fSISS O'KM.HM. I.MU-.VTR1 SAKtm OHUEBS TITLK 8
(p 432 2M) (MvgnMr •*. No. M—»Ifr«JI
(H» All Other Substances Without * Ceiling Limit. Employee exposure lo
roiiri-nlr.ilioiii jbo\«- the PKL jh.ill be controlled so as lo prevent harmful
eflr< Is surh as lurrosis. significant irritation of the eyes, skin or respirator)
li.icl. or chronic or irreversible tissue change
M»l \. SIH h -nbsl.Hires aff not known lu CJMV jdtrrst* r-OVrS if the nuiimuni eoneen-
Ir.iliini ol ev|M>Mire is limited in jrrordjiire uilh the follow ing guidelines
I'LL I .I/in- '
T.ibl,- A< I or AC-Jl
OlO I
>l lo 10
>m
Miiltifjlir.ilii'ii h'.irlor
A'or \l.i\iiiiiun (.'oiimitr.itioii
3
2
15
MM- |>pi» v-iliie mill's* the runrrnlcjlion it unl\ eiprosvrd in ing'M*
(3) Ceiling Limits Employee exposures shall be controlled such thai the
applicable ceiling limit specified in Table AC-I or AC 2 for any airborne Con
I.mini.ml is not exceeded al any time.
(rl> Skin Nnl.ihon The substances designated by "S" in the skin notation
columns of T.ibles AC-I and AC 2 may be absorbed into the bloodstream
through thr skin, the mucous membrances and'or the eve. and contribute lo
ihr overall exposure Appropriate protective clothing shall be provided for and
used b\ emplovees as necessary to prevent skin absorption
\( )f I Tin- .ilx'M' lefimremenl duet nul remove the emplmer > responsibility lo provide
.ippnipii.ilc clothing fur protection (ruin eorrosue or skin irritating mjleri.ils whit h nut
nul LH-.II llif ' S design.ilion
(<•> Workplace Monitoring
(I) Win-never it is reasonable to suspect that emplovees mav be exposed to
concentration', of airborne contaminants in excess of lev els permitted in Section
5l55ic). the emplover shall monitor (or cause lo have monitored) the work
i-ii\iroiiinent so that exposures to emplovees can be measured or calculated
(21 \\ hen exposures to airborne contaminants are found or are expected lo
evcred allow able levels, measures to control such harmful exposures shall be
instituted in accordance with Section 5141.
(3i For thr adequate protection of emplovees. the person supervising di-
recting or evaluating the monitoring and control methods shall be versed m this
vl.ind.ird .ind sh.ill be competent in industrial hvgiene practice
\(>ll In I M ilil.it>' Ihr drier I ion of conHiliom Irjdinp lu M-nom o\rmpo*nm the
>< 1.1 IIIMI; ill llie «orl on\ imnmenl b\ JMV person julhoriirH l>\ the rnipln\n uviup
.ipl>rn|iri.ili IIK .iMiriii); Hi-v irev. it rnroiiuped
(• u. NO >4—»2»«)i (p 432 261)
APPENDIX
A Compulation for Exposures to Contaminants with Independent Health
Effects
The 8-hour time-weighted average concentration (TWA) of a single
substance lo which an individual is exposed during a workday shall be
calculated usine the following formula lo determine compliance with the PEL
specified in Table AC-1, AC-2, or AC-3
= C.T. -r C,T, + . . . C..T.
8*
Where T is the duration in hours of the exposure to a substance at the
concentration C For multiple substances with independent health effects, an
independent comparison of each TWA with the corresponding PEL shall be
made to determine compliance.
•NOTE tighl 18) is used js denominjlor regardless of loljl hours of unrkdj)
t\ XMI'I.L To illustrate the use of this formula, assume iin employee is enposed lo
•iirbornr toluene ul u ronmitrjlion of ISO ppm (ur 2 hours. 75 ppm fur 3 hours, jnd 50
ppm lor 4 hours during M S hour workdj).
TWA = |(I50 x 2i -f (75 X 3) -I- (50 x 4)),8' = 91 ppm
The series of exposures in this example are eouiv alent to an 8-hour exposure
al a concentration of 91 ppm w hich is below the PEL value of 100 ppm specified
for toluene by Table AC-2
To determine whether the excursion limit or the ceiling limit is exceeded,
short lime samples al the highest expected concentrations must be taken If the
duration of the exposures lo toluene between 200 and 500 ppm exceeds 10
minutes in one workday, the excursion duration is exceeded. Also, any em-
ployee exposure lo toluene above 500 ppm is a violation of the ceiling limit
D Computation for Exposures to Contaminants with Additive Health Ef-
fects
In the absence of information lo the contrary, the adverse health effects of
ex|>osure to tvv o or more toxic materials during the workday shall be considered
additive and the following formula shall be used for calculating D. the fraction
of the allowable daily exposure
D =
PEL,
TWA.
PEL,
TWAn
PEL,,
Where TW A is the lime w eighted av erage concentration of a particular sub
stances involved m the exposure (as calculated bv the formula in Appendiv Al.
and PEL ib ihe corresponding permissible exposure limit for that substance as
specified b> Table AC-I, AC 2 or AC-3 The vaJue of D shall not exceed uml>
Health effects for mullmle contaminants are not considered additive when
different organs of the bom are affected bv indiv idual substances, or w here the
same effect (such as narcosis) is produced bv two substances but the PEL for
one substance is based on another effect For example, an exposure lo I ppm
vni) I chloride would not add significantly to the narcotic effect of 100 ppm
toluene, nor would 100 ppm toluene add to the carcinogenic effect of vinyl
chloride
-------
$5155
(p. 432.262)
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8
(HoglMM M. No. 4— 1 »44|
TABLE AC I
PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMITS FOR CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS
Qienunl
Atutitca
RrYiitry
\umber1" flui"
J383968
75070
64197.
IOS247
Ł7641
75058 $
U9S3 S
74862
540590
79276
79145
507*2
107028
79061 S
79107
1071)1 S
> 309002 $
1
ro *
0 107186 S
107051
10*23 S
2179591
1X0738
92671 $
HI 415
91598
504290
7773060
7664417
12125029
7773060
62*637
626380
62&) S
I1Z7U9
" AW"
Atuie', 0.0.0.0 left amethyl 0,0 ihiodi p-pheoylene
phosphor othwale
AceUldehyde
Acetic Kid. KC Tible AC-t
Accbc anhydride
Acetone. KC Table AC-t
Acelonitnle
i-ActtyLaminoiluoreae, N fluoren lyl tcetimide,
tet Secbon 5209
Acetylene
Acetylene dichloride, KC 1,2-dicHloroethylene
Acetylene letribiarode, 1,1 iJ letjabromoethane
Acrtylrne letiachlonde, see 1.1.2,2 letiachlofoelhine
Acervlsalicyuc acid (Aspirin)
Acfolem
AcryUmide
Acrylic sod
Acrylonitnle. KC also Section 5213
Aldnn. 1X3,4 IO,!aKeucrikxo-l.44a^A8a beuhyd/o-endo.
U-eiChiWuDeUuAOnaphlhilene
Allyl alcohol
Ally! chlonde
Ally! glyodyl ether ACE
Allyl piopyl disulhde
Aluminum, aliyls (not otherwise dasafied)
Aluminum, soluble salts
Aluminum metil ind oode
Aluminum pyio powden
Aluminum welding fume]
Alundum |AI|0,|, corundum. KC Tible AC-1.
nuisance parbculalei
Ammodimelh|ilberuene. sec XyLdene
4-Aminodiphenyl, sec Sccbon 5209
f •Aminoelnanof, see Elhanolamme
lAmmonaphlhikne. sec beta NaphthyUnune, Section 5209
i Anunopyndine
Ammale '. Ammonium niUamile
Ammorui
Ammonium chlonde fume
Ammumuin lul/arrule. Ammale
n A/nyi Kclale
KC Amyl anUte (ill iwmeis and nuituro)
. i
Aniline
Amjidmc (oitSo tnd para lumirrtl
Aiiliiiiun) 41. J cuiniiouiiilv u Sb
Anliuiun> luuiidt. liAlidhlig
fru.iiuo\r% f> ituounti n) 11 cud u( Tdttlr \l' 1
FEL^
Col-
ppaiM mg/U"n io/"
10
too in
i K C
40 70
(M
1 IS
5
01 OS
OJ
10 30
t t3
OJ3
t 5
1 1
5 12
t U
: '1 1
i
03 I ^
TITLE 8
|R»gi«t»i M, No
Qtemicil
Atatrjclt
JJrffMfft
\unibfi"1 JJjfl'kl
56U84
7440371
7784421
113221-4
MX8U62424
1912249
B6500 S
UU526 S
&Z1224
744U393
114261
17804352
71432 S
92X75 S
803fl3u6
71432
106514
100447
141662
92524
N42UI
1)04821
' I30W62
^ 16 10!ŁHii4
10
10
100 MO
125 670
tin
1U
01 03
03
03
7637072
314409
T7W*V>
n«oz2
74973
744M
7i25! S
14(U«
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY' ORDERS
PEL
AW «™"'
.
ANTb, l-(rnaphlhyl|-2-lhiouTea, Banru. Haltraci
Aquahn *. KC Acrolein
Ai|(on lkl
Anemc. and inorfianic uteruc compounds,
(sec also Section 52141
Anemc, oriaruc compounds, is As
Arnne. Alii, 005
Asbeflos (including arbnolile, imotile. anthophtllilr.
chrywtur. ciociJoblf and tiemolilr). sec Sccbon S208
Asphalt (pcboleum) hunet
Atiuine
Aunphoi methtl. 0.0-dimelhyl S^(4-oio-l iVbtruotnaun
3(4H| ylmelh)!) phosphorodilhiule. Culhion'
13. AjobuisoburiTonimle decompourion product.
sec Tetiamelhyl succinommle
Aiodnn', sec Monociolophos
Banum, toluble compounds, as Ba
Baygon '. I isopiopoiyphenyl N melhykarbamale. Propotui
Bcnomtl 08
Beniene. see Table AC 2
Bcniidine. 4.4 -diiminotuphrnyl. KC Section 5209
Benun. sec Petroleum diitJLlei
Bcniol. sec bcniene, Table AC 2
p-Benioquinone. sec Quinone
Beniovl pcioude, dibcnioyl pcroudr
Beniyl chlonde alpKa-chloiololuene I
Beryllium and beryllium compounds, sec Table AC 2
Bidnn*. KC Dicrolophos
Biphenyl. diphenyl. phemlbeniene 0!
Bisichloromelhyli elhei. see bis Chloiomelhyl ethei.
sec Sechon 5209
Bismuth Itllunde
Bismuth lellunde (Klemum-doped)
Boialei. leha. sodium salts
Anhydrous
Dccahtdratc
Penlahydiale
Boion oode
Boion tnbionude I
Boron tn/luonde I
'
B
Biomine pcnlafluonde 0 1
Bromochloromethane. sre Chloiobiomorthane
tiiumitelKine sec tlhyl bromide
Bfoiniiforni mbrumoniellujir 03
BiixnamrUunr. %rr Methyl bronudr. Tiblr AC J
J5155
(p 432263)
u,
Ceil
aif'Hfn uig"'
n i
U J
_
001
Oi
02
j
10
Oi
05
05
10
5
i
15
10
i
I
1
10
10
) C
IA
IU
n ^
VI
07
5
-------
f 5155
(p 432264)
Ormial
Aktnr*
tm mt ift •
ArfUDT
yVWrr'" A."
new
106990
106978
109795
71363
79933
II 1761 S
18864
105464
540MS
141322
71363 S
•am
75650
109739 S
II 1762
1 189851 S
142080
138227
109795
> 89723 S
1
ŁJ 98511
7440439
1306190
777*44 1
411341
156677
1306620
1305788
10101390
76222
106602
105602
2425061 S
63252
1563662
7440440
I24V8
75150
6300*)
5WIJ4
VtiV> S
J5-M
351504
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
1
» toot**
mutiAunmuthiw Trilkui
""J~* J1'— 'Ju"j™n*. »* lnflUi.viuiUj.iuu«u
l>Botadwne
Buune
1 Butinethioi we Butyl merctptio
1 Butinol. KC • Butyl ilcohol
t Butane; ve Methyl ethyl ketone
1 Butoiyethinot, Butyl Ollonlve
• Butyl tcetile
•t Butyl KtWe
lert Butyl iceUte
Butyl iciylate
• Butyl ilcobot l-botinol
«c Butyl ilrahol
lert Butyl ilnhol
But)Umine
But)l Cettowlve. we t Butoiyethinol
lert Butyl chionule. di left butyl ch/omite. it ClOi
••Butyl dycidyl ether. BCE, 1 butoiy t3-epoiyprop«ne
n Butyl Ucrjlr.
• Purvl mercaptn
o-wc ButylpheraJ
D-lert-ButyHofueiie
Cadmium metil dirt, u Cd, we Tible AC t
Cidmiuni. tduble ulb. u Cd. we Tible AC!
Cadmium obde hunt, u Cd
Ciloum iiwnile; we Anenie, moffink (we ibo SecrJo*
5214)
Cilciuro rubonile. we Tible AC-3, numnct ptrtxrubla
Cilciunt ryinuiude
Cilciura hydiobde
CJciumoude
Cilnum gbnte, we Tible AC-3, nuiunre pvtKulilej
Cunpha (lynlhetjc)
Cipt oUctm duri
Ciprobrtim iidr
McgtaMrl
ra.
/*•»'•'
1^00
800
B
190
m
10
90
100
100
-
B
\
j
It
.
-
_
.
I
-
5
-
~
.
5000
01
t
TITLES
N. »+. 4-t««4|
Ml
V/V-B $>
UOO
IQQO
• f^mf
710
00
950
190 C
300
IS C
01 C
133
fi
JQ
eo
005 C
«3
5 -
t
u
1
V
01
I
5
01
33
1.000
14
B
TITLE 8
|H»«i«t*f W. No
.tb'lrjcl-
frfiirn
Aumfcv'" Sm
IIII59
90TH146
II35I7>II
57749 S
8001352 S
T782505
107 2UO
5J2274
79049
BrVMII S
74T5
75456
S34492I9 S
1 1097691 S
1066%
75003
107073
75014
67663
74873
I013W
542AM
100LU5
600i»
761 U
76062
I26W, S
|j)liW»
O^jtM C
»1TO J
2S2IHH2 S
7440473
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAKETY ORDERS
»4— l>le~UI
45155
(p 432 265)
fEL
li.4.77a lrtiah)dro-4.7-
mflrunomdjnr
Chlormalrd rimphene lotaphene
Chlonnjird diphrnil oiidr
Chlorine
Chlorine dioiide
Chlorine liilluondr
Chlocoarelaldeh\de
ilpha Chkxoafetophenone. phenaryl chloride
Chlotcuretil chloride
Chlorobrniene monochlorobeniene
o-ChlorobrnnlioVw malononitriie OCHM
Chlorobfomorlhane bromochloromrllunr
2Chloro^lAbuUdiene we Chloroprrnr
Chknodifluoromelhanr flixxof jtbon 22
Chkxodiphenil i42~r chlonnri
Chloiodiphrntl l chlocidf Srrhon 5210
Chloroform. Irichloromrllunr
Chkxomrltunr we Mrlhil rhlonde Tablr U 2
Chlofometh\l methvl rlhrr we Mrtrul chloromrlhil elher.
Sex r»on 520V
bit fhlotomr (hv 1 ether we alto Ser hon 52W
1 Chloro-4 nirtobrniene wr p - \ilrixhloiobf n;rnr
lOikxol nirroptopane
Chroroprnlifluoioetrune
CSIoiopicrui tnchloronirromrlhinr
Chkwop'ene t-chloi»l J butjdirnf
o-(~hloroMuenr
o( hkrololuene
t (hloro-6-(rnrhloromrlhtl|p\Tidinr \ Ser>-"
C"hlorp>fifm Durtbjn*
Chromium mrlal
Chromium ill' compounds u ( t
('hromiiuD (Illi compounds at ( r
( hiomium |V|i com|KHindt 4* ( r
V. 4lri tolublr Cr \ 1 com|>iund<
Certain »)ln intnlublr ( i \ 1
compound!
.
-
1
01
01
1
005
005
75
005
20U
1.000
-
-
10
OOUI
2
IOOU
01
10
50
50
2
05
05
05
3
03
04
3
«3
02
350
04
1050
3500
1
05
50
00)3
in
63211
07
45
2.1J
2.VI
10
02
05
05
05
005
005
C
C
C
-------
{5155
(p 432.266)
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8
(RcgltUr M. No. 4—1-2*-M|
Atutricts
Registry^
FŁL<
itwlk
Ai/nr'"
I49T76I8
2971906
8007452
7440484
62748
7440506
I367OT
Quomile ore processing (chiomale), u Cr
Chromium, soluble ch/omic, chromous ulu, u Ci
Chrornyl chlonde
Qopidol, Coyden*
Coal (Bituminous) dust see Table AC-3
Coal tar pitch volatile!'"
CobaJl. metal fume and dust, u Co
Compound 1080*. see Sodium fluoroacetile
Copper metal fume, u Cu
Copper salts, dusts and misU, u Cu
Corundum |A),0,|, see Alundum
Cotton dust (see also Secbon 5217)
Coyden'. see Cbpidol
Dai* herbicide, tee Sodium I (2,4^kKlorophenoiy)elhyl
sJlate
0023
1
KJ
M
1319773.
106394.'
95487.
106445
123739
299865
96828
420042
57125
460195
506774
110827
108930
iwwr
IIO&38
IOH9I8
121824
542W7
2S7W3
94757
115913
50293
62737
17702419
78342
123422
Uu)W
1VH15
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Cretol (dl isomers)
Crotonaldehyde, beta melhylacrolein
Crulomale
Cumene, isopropylbeniene
Cyan amide
Cyanide, u CN
Cyanogen
Cyanogen chlonde
Cycloheune
Cycloheianol
Cycloheunone
Cycloheiene
Cycloheiylanune
Cyclomle. BOX Cyclotnmcthylenetnnitranune
Cyclopenladiene
C^clopenlane
2.4 D. 2.4-dichloruphenoiyacelic acid, Weedone* 638
Dasamt*. see Feruullolluon
DDT. 1,1.1 tnchloroU bis (p-chlorophenyl)ethane
DDVP. see Durhlorvos
Decaborane
Delruv*. see DioialKion
Deinelon. a nuiluie ol OOilieuSil 02|elhtll)uo)ethvl
phoifilioiottuoale and O.U -dielliyl S 2|elhyllluo)elnyl
phuiphorutliioale. Syslot*
Ducclone aliohol. 4 ht>lioi>-4 niritiyl 2 pcnUnone
1 2 Uiuiuiiot-Oi iiit ler Klliylentnli^iiiiiic
• Uuimon 00-dicOifl i> 12 ty>propyl^nielhyl-
005
05
Oil
10
01
01
Oi
1
t
_
JO
_
-
10
03
300
SO
25
300
10
-
75
600
-
-
005
001
30
t
5
U5
I
i
20
06
1,050
200
100
1,015
40
15
200
1,720
10
1
03
01
240
CtJ-
4 pM
01
TITLE 8
IfUgiiKf U.
.ibitucli
.\umbrr'" SI
3MM3
94360
IWC457
30U765
9612*
75616
IOtt.34
102418
I07b64
»4742
75722-W
95JOI
IOM67
91941
75718
IIW25
75343
I07U62
75J54
S4U39U
111444
7S4J4
75IN2
5W7&
7HK75
542756
7j(wu
42737
141662
SI24XJI
77736
I02.V4J
60571
III42J
\(HHf.
H1I17S
103111
111*11
6UV7
*ŁŁ
75616
No
s
s
S
S
S
S
S
S
s
s
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAKETY ORDERS
M—t- 2MJ|
PE
\W
Diaiomelhjne
Dibenio)! peroiide. >er Benio>l peioude
Diborane
Dibrom*. naled OfrdimelhilO-lU-dibromo-
2J djchbioelh)li phosphate
1 1 Dibromo-3-chloiopropane. DBCP. lee Section 5212
Dibromodinuoromelhane ut Dilluorodibromomelhane
1,2 Dibiomoeltunr. sec tlhvlene dibiumide. Wlion 5219
2 iDibulilammolelhanol
Dibulvl phosphate
Dibulil phltulale
Dirhloioaceh lene
frDichlorobrnirne
p-DiihluroU-niene 1 4 Dichloiobeniene ire Table \C2
3.3 Dichlorobeniidine. 4,4 •dianuno-3.3 -dichlorobiphentl
tee Section 5iW
Dirhloiodifluoromeirune see Table AC 2
1.3 Dichloro-5.5 dunethtl htdanloin
I.I Dichlarorlhane
UDichlorelhane see Elhi lene dichlondr Table AC 2
I.I Uichloruelhvlene. see Vmilidene chlonde
\1 Uichloroelhxlene acet\lene dichlonde
Dichloiuelhvl ether. bis(2 chloroelhvl. etber
Dichloronuoromelhane. Flurocarbon 21
Dichloromelhane see Melh)lene chloride Table \C 2
1 1 Dichlorol nilioelhane
\1 Dichloiopropane see prop\lene dichlonde
Dichloiopiopene
2J Dichloropropionic acid
U DichloioletiaTiuororlhanc. Fluorocaibun 114
DicMorioi (DD\ Pi, 12 d.chloroviml dunelhtl phosphate
Vaponi*
Dicrolophos Bidnn*
DiC)cluhei\lmelhane-44 -duhtcyanale
see Melh)lene bii (4-c)clohfi)lisoc)analel
D,c,clupentadiene
Diculopenladieml iron
Dieldnn li.34 IO.IOhe»achloro-6.7-epuu I44j56
7.8.hj-ociahidr» 1 .4 endo-eio-S 8-dimelhanonaphlhalene
Oielhaiiolafiune
DiethvLnune
2 iDieilulammolelhanol
1 4 Dtelhtlene dioude see p Dioiane
Dirlhil elher. set- elhil elhei
l)i l2rlh>lhn>ll phlrulalr trr l)i src orr>l uhlhaJale
II,, -cli) 1 l,k,iu-
Dicthtl pturijjir
dibioniu
-------
15155
(p 432268)
Ofourtl
Ayu/rt
AumArr'" An*
142061
221*0
123319
IOB&M
106189
108203
KWT)
ID9)
114401
60117
I300T36
I2I67T
I3303T
I08MS
30076)
68122
)7I4T
61641
•t» 62TJ9
1
K> I3III1
UP 777SI
ED454S
S2ASO
IOKM
U4S?I
IVOI6
121 142
12391 1
78JU
925i4
1223*
lOIWi
12319)
2"?M~JS
fJSuC
M7ii7
97778
2WM-I
I1M7II
3.yi>)i
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
GENERAL IMHiSTRV SAFKTV ORDERS TITLE 8
mft *4i
FLL
AW ppn,"'
Wolilin'. wr Citxi/ol
DulvrwM rthn . OCL b«l2 3-rpoiypiopyll ether 0 1
t>Dih>dr«)beniene. wr htdioqumonr
Diuobur\l krtonr. lWimeth>l-Hwpljnonr B
DutopropyUnine )
Dmoptopvl rthef. wr hoprocnl ether
DimelhofMnnhuw. wr MrltulJ
DunethvUrelunidr 10
Dunrlhtbmine 10
4-Dunr(h«Ummo*ioi>rnime. ur Srrtwn )209
Dunrth)Ununobrnirnr. wr Xilidinr
K,\ Durirlhtluuline. dimrlh> Iphrnt luninr )
Dunrlhi Ihrnirnr wr Xtlenr, Tiblr AC 2
l>DvnrthilbultlKrlilc wr wr Hn>l trrtilr
OjlXDunrlhtlO-llj-dibrornot2-dirhloiarlh»li phoiphalr
wr Dibrom'
\\Dimrllulfonruiiudr. DMF 10
i6-Dimrthtl-4-hrpt>none. wr Dutobut)! krlonr
I.I Dunrlh>lhidiuine 0)
DrnirlU know we Arrtanr. TiMr AC 2
N.\ Dunrthtlmnoumine.
wr \ Nitiowdimrlhvliminr Srrtwn 5209
Dvnrthtl phUublr
Dimrth)! uUite. meth)l tul/jli- 0 1
Dvutrobrnirnr (ill uomritl
01)
46-Duutio-» U 6-dimrrophrnol
35-Dinitio-ololuuriidc. Zojlt-nr*
t4-Duutrotolurnr
pDwunr trih frtdr l.4-dioiar)tlohrunr
1 4^Jirthilrnr aioudr B
Dwtjltuon Drlnj>*
Diphrml wr HiphrnJ
Diphrm UiTunr \ phrn> Unilinr
Diphrn\ Imrlhinr anwf unjlr
wr Mrthilrnr Ui ipfinivlnor\in4tri
Diprup>l krtunr Si
Dipiopilrnr |Urol monomrlh\l rlhrp M>
1
Diquil l.r-rih\knr 2i bipitidmium dibmmidr
Di vrr ortil phlruljlr bn<]
rth\lbrit|iulilluUlr
Diiulnijn,
Diiullnlon dmilon* Oftdirllnl S 1 irlh\llhiuirlli>l
phmphoitidilhiiuti
JMlMril buhl purwjl
[)iut(in
Lfil
mf tf'n g,f»'
0)
1)0
10
35
18
B
30
1
J
0)
1
02
j
1 }
90
02
in
lli
6(l>
TITLE 8 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
|N««teur M. M*. 4— 1-»««|
OkaarW
Atatncti K
A^KS1" i
I08S76
BSISS
9+4229
1141)348
11)297
TBD8
106898
210464)
7SMB
U6)2)
78840
7)081
(417)
14143)
K3I22
11060)
1111)9
141786
14088)
6417)
7)047
MI85)
100414
74964
106354
7M03
748)1
107073
1071)3
106934
107062
1072 II
1 01211
628966
nom
I09N64
Oi
] 110496
)
2 1)1564
III
10
10
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
AW"
Divtnrl beazene
Dovthenn A. we rhenyl ether-diphenyl auitwc
Dunfatn'i we OJwopyri/M
Dyfanite'.KtFanafoi
Emery, we Tible AC-3, nubmrr ptrtioJiln
Endosutftn, Thwdin*. 6,7W.IO.IOh«uchloco.|3J«.6,
3-oode
Endrin, liJ,4,IO.IO-heuchlori>4.7-epoiy-l,f4O.(,7jUt-
ortihydro- 1 ,4-endo-nKk)^Alrnr dibramidc. M-dibtonxwlhuw, we Srrtwn 5219
Elh)lrne dirhlonde. IJI-dKhJoroelhine. wr Tibk AC I
Elhylrne gtyrol (putmiUln)
Elhylrne |lyml (yipor)
Elhylnw flyral dinitiilr
Dhylrne glyrol manorlhyl ether, wr iDhoiyrlhutal
Elh)lrnr |lyrd aionofnrlhyl rlhei. wr 1 Mrlhoryrlhanol
Elh)lrnr (lyral monamelhyl ether irrtilr, mrlhyl rrOotolve
•ccljlf . 2 mclhoryflhyl trrlilr
Elh)lr nruiunr . rthylriuminr. irr tlw Srrhon )2H9
ff""'
10
-
1
(M
3
JO
400
\fOO
10
B
100
m
JO
1.000
1
10
_
90
00)
B
0)
«jS155
(p. 432.268>
I*
mg/H» $"'
01
01
10
0)
1
04
IK
no
1.400
JO
1.900
18
130
43)
890
230
2,600
J C
B
10
IB C
03'"
120
1
VM;
|)\ll fr \ N DimrlhillornuiniHi
IIVIII wr I I Dirnrllultndl^ll"
-------
^5155
(p 432270)
ChrniicjJ
.\b\lijfl-
.\tvnber'" Sim'
IOW44
7V343
16219753
75061
78933
100743 S
76104
IIMI3
SSAfi
I44M64I
12604509
14806607
77H24I4
75694
> 75718
1 75434
to 75456
76120
76131
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
|H*gi*t«r U.
PEL
" Aj/iir'" PP'T1" '
Elh>lrnroudr 10
ElUrlhri 400
Elhvl loimalr 100
•Elhvlidrnr chlondr. trr I.I Dichluiorthanr
Elh) lidror norbomrnr i
Elhxl mncapun rlhuiflhiul 05
Elh)l mrlhvl krlonr. trr Mrlhvl rlhvl krlonr
S Elh| Imorpholinr, 4-tlhvl 1 4 lrtiah>diooujinr 5
Elhv 1 ulicalr. Irnarlh) 1 ulicalr 10
FrmuUolhton. Daunil
f million
Fribam frnw \.\-dimrlhillhiocjibamalr. Frrmalr*
Frnot anadium dull
Fibioui flail trr Glut
Fluondr u F
- Fluonnr 1
Fluoiocaibon II. trr Tnchlorofluoiomrlhajir
Fluoiof jrbon 12. trr Oichlotodiflooiomrlhanr Tablr AC 2
Fluoiocaibun 21 trr Dichloionionofluoiomrlhanr
Fluoiucaibon 22 trr Chloiodifluoromrlhanr
Fluoioraibon 112 irr I.IJiTrtiachloro-l .2 difluororlhanr
Fluoiocaibun 113. trr l.li Tnchloio-l.2.2 trifluoiorlhanr.
TITLE 8
. No. M— HO-MI
id.
CeJ
ng'\l'n ing'*'
20
I.2UO
300
15 C
1
23
01
10
1
25
2
JOUi
75127
64186
IV»W>2
9«i!l
SBIJUI
Tablr AC 2
Fluoiocaibon 114 trr 12 Dichloiolrliafluoiorlhanr
756V4 Fluoiomchloioflirllunr trr Tnchloiofluoiomrlhanr
Tablr AC 2
S Fonotui - 01
FormaJdrhvdr 2 1
Foimamidr 20 30
FomiK acid i 9
fitorn' irr Fluoiocaibon)
(uiadan* trr Caiboluian
S tuifuial 2 6
S fuiluivl alcohol 10 40
Catolmr 300 WO
Crnnanium Irliahvdndr 02 06
CUn htiuui 01 'dun i < 7|im in diamrinl trr Tablr Al 3.
nuiuncr (uiliculalrt
CluUialdrhvdr 02 07
Cl>crnn nnvl trr Tablr AC 3. nuiuncr paihculalrt
Clvndul 23ru«;iv I nropannl 25 75
Clviol niouubuivl rlhri trr 2 Huioivrlhaniil
Gl)i(jl inuniirlhvl rlhri trr 2 Klliiiivrlhanol
Clvjul niouoiiirtlivl rllirl wr 2 Mrlhuivrlhajiul
Cia(>hilr Ifi^luial) trr Tal>ir AC 3
Ciaptutr (v>nllirh(). irr Ijblr A(' 3. nuiunrr pjrtitulaln
77D2652
III7U
\\Mft
ll»V>t
TITLE 8
(fUgutcr U. No
ChfmicJ
Abtturtt
Aumirr'" Sim'"
66.VIO
IJ397245
7440i*
8JJIWI
7440597
76441 S
ICM5
76hM
77474
67721 S
I3J5K7I $
6MI62
8221160
110543
»I706
IOMOI
100649
107415
302012 S
IOOJM06
7647010
7490ft
7664393
1333740
10035106
7647010
74**JK S
76M393
771!MI
"M"T3
77vJIN
Iilll9
9W.II S
95316
755J5U
7M7d
4UV.71U.
IJtKJTI
IMhMJb
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
fa.
AW
Cuthion*. trt Aimphot mrlhvl
C)ptum calcium lulfalr dihvdulr let Tablr AC 3.
nuiuncr (url.culjln
Hafnium
HOI trt hruinclhvlrnr dntooarulr
Hrl.um
Hrplarhloi. 1.4.567 8D-hrplachloiol..477a Irtiahtdio-
4.7 mrlhjnotndriif
n Hrplanr
Hrtachlotobutadirnr
Hr iachlof or\ cloprnladirnr
llriachloiorthanr peichJoiorlhanr
HruchloioiuphlhaJrnr
Hnifluoioacrlonr. I.I.I J J J-hr uAuOfo-2 piopanont
Hriamrlh; Irnt dntorvaiulr HOI
n Hrianr
olhri itomrn
! Hrtanonr. trr Mrth\l bulvl Lrlonr
Hrtonr ttr Mrlhvl itobuivl krlone
trc Hr«v| jctlalr 4 mrlhvl 2 ptnlyl actlalr.
l^dinirlhil bulil arrlalr
llrivlrnr {Kcul
H)draj.nr
Hidiobiomcc and trr Htdrogrn bromide
Hidiochlofic acid trr Htdrogrn chlondr
Hidiociamc icid trr Htdiotrn oanidr
Hidiofluonc icid. u HF trr H)diogrn fluondr
H>droprn
Htdro^rnalrd trrphrntlt
Htdiotrn bromidr. it HBi
ll>drofirn chlondr u HO munatir acid
llvdru^rnctinidr ai IIC\
Htdio^rn fluondr. u HF
H> dioprn prioudr (90^ ) . u H,0,
Hidiuyrn trlrmdr H.V
H\dioern tulfidr. trr Tablr AC 2
llidiuqu.nonr 1.4 brnirnediul
Hvdiuivpropvl acivlalr
Indrnr
Indium and compound* as In
Inril dun trr nuiuncr painculaln
lodinr. AS Ij
luilulorm
II'DI trr Itouhuionr dnsortinalr
liun unjc* funir
liun prnlacarb'iiiil as f r
Ifufi uht loJublr. v Ir
»«'"
,
ikt
-
400
002
001
1
01
002
50
500
50
25
01
ih>
05
3
J
10
3
1
005
-
05
10
_
01
06
_
01
45155
(p 432.270.1)
Cnl
mg W*n in/"
05
.
05
1600
024
on
10
02
07
014 C
160
1.8ft)
300
125 C
01
-
5
10
7 C
II C
2
15
02
2
3
50
01
1 C
10
i
08
1
-------
f 5155
(P «2J
Ormml
Abitrjrl-
Ar/li/ri
\imtnw
11392
II15I3
1 10190
78SJI
18957216
78591
409TI9
109)91
108214
(7630
T3JIO
64J2S7
lOUUJ
40I6IC
11)23*;
461514
I67-5I77S
If
' 'MB
W '"4I
1/1 I3057M
1317653
7SW6T8
irnom
1)09444
121755
IO&5I6
1(779651
IOI68H
IOJ*T?1
141797
79414
CENER4L INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8
f* ^' 4N««<«<*r to. MO. M an»av»
ftt'4'
O™1*' • in
•*"' Aj/nr '"
Itoafml acrtalr. Imrthtfcutyl acrtalr
luaiml alcohol. lmrth>lbuianol
Iwburtl acrtalr I-mrlhtlpioptl acrtalr
- lnbu»> 1 alcohol. 1 nxlh) lp> opanol
lu»cl>l alcohol
bophoronc. 3.3.3-tTvnrth)12-cyTloKrienr-l-onf
S Iwphoronr duwrvanalr. IPDI
Iwpiopoiyrthanol
Itootocnl arrtalr
1 topi 001 1 alcohol
IwpiocnUminr
S Mioprop\Uiuhnf
Itopioptl rlhrt, duMprop)) dhn
Iwprotnl |l>nd>l tthrt. ICE. 1.2-rpoiy
luopropoi)ptopanr
kaolin, trr Tablr ACJ. nunancr ptrbculaln
Irlrnr. tlhrnonr
UnnalrVirt Mrthonul
Uad anrnalr. m SKlwm 5214 and 5116
Uad chronulr. ai Pb |«c* aba Srctxm 32l6i
Uad ImrlaUic) and moifanic compoundi. oust and (un*.
ai Pb Itrr abo Sectxm 31l6i
Uad irnarlhyl. wt Trttarlh)! lead
Uad irnamrlhti «r» Trtiamrlhyl lead
Lunr XT Calcium oodr
Lamnlonc. calcium carbonalr. w* Table ACO
nuiuncr parorulalri
S LanoUnr. I1J 4 j.6-h(uchlororyTV)rieunt. |imnu nonvi
LjlKium htdndr
L P C . kqurTird prtrolruni gu
Mapralr. magnraiam caibonile. irr Tablr AC 3,
nuiuncr parnrulaln
Marnrnum oodr (umr. ai Mi
S Malalhion 0. O-dimrlhOS-llj-dx-aiborthonrdiyll
phmphofodilhioalr C^hionV Ml T'
Malric anhtdnde. m oulmfdioif anh|rdndr
Minganrv and rompoundi. ai Mn
Man^anrw hunr. u Mn
S Manfanrw. C)clofjrnl*dxn>l rncatbon)! as Mn
Manfanrw Irtiood*
Maiblr calcium caiborulr. let Tabtr AC 3.
nuiuncr parhcubln
MDI irr Mrlh)lrnr bii |phrn>l uocyanalrl
S Mritui) alkil rornpounas r Hf tn Tablr AC 2
Mrirun all lonpt rirrpl all tl rompoundi u Hg KT Tablr
Mrtit)lrnr wr 1 JMnmcthilbrnirnf
Mnil>londr 4 mrlhvl Jprnlrne 2-onc
Mrlhjrr>li( and
.. *•»
PP">
100
100
ISO
50
so
5
101
B
BO
400
}
I
BO
JO
05
_
_
-
1000
_
-
013
_
_
-
.
AC 2
13
|0
«gw'-n ffi'
DO
160
700
ISO
270
B C
009
105
sso
980
12
10
LOGO
140
09
005
005
03
0025
1.800
10
in
I
J C
I
01
1
60
70
74S1I
Urlhanr
MrlKanrlluol XT MclM mrirapljn
TITLES
4H*g»t»r au. NO.
CJtrmml
HrfHtn
\umbft"* flw'kl
C7J6I
16752775 S
72415
I(WM S
1104%
150765
793><
74997
46113 $
I26%7 S
I09KT5
67561
74195
1*112
II04JO
1(0,10 ^
95i34
7M»
39I7N6 S
1104^
74873
7I5SS
107)02
7505S
I08ST2
I56394J
VOWfc S
111*113 S
8K20TC S
101 144 S
3l.'4jn|
lOlWv.
7509?
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
»» ti»m
«
\trnf'" ffw"'
Mrltunol wr Mrlhvl alcohol. Table AC 2
MrlhormL Linnale*
Mrlhoochloi. I.I l-tnchl«o-l4bu(p-mrthoi)phrn\li
ethanr . Maiulr*. Moor*
t Mrlhonrihanol. Mrthil Crlknolvr B
2 Mrlhonrthvl jcrlalr. trr Elh)lrnr fl)col monomrlhtl
rlhri arrtalr
4-Mrlhonphrnol
Mrlhtlarrlalr W>
Mrlh>lacrltlror. pfopriw 1.000
Mrlhtl Krtilrnr pfocudirnr muluir MAPP 1.000
Mrlhvl acrtlalr 10
alpha Mrlhklarnlonilf Or 1
Mr(h>UI dimrlhonmrlhanr I.OX
Mrlhvl alcohol mrihinol. trf TabW AC 2
MrlhtUmmr 10
\lrlh\l ami) alcohol trr Mrthil uobulil ca/binol
Mrthvl n aiml arlonr t hrplanonr SO
S MrlhtlaniUnr nwno-inrlmUnilinr 05
»Mrlhtlanibnr irr o-Toluidmr
Mrlh.l btomidr. trr Tabk \C2
Mrth\ 1 bulil arlonr 2 nrunonr S
MrlhtlCrllowlvr trf 1 mrlhoi\rlhinol
Mrlhil OllowKr acrtalr tet Elhvlrnr fKrol n-,onomrlhil
rlhri KTijIf
Mrlhtlchlondr trr Tablr AC 2
Mrthtl chlorolorm I.I 1 tnchlotorlhanr MT Tablr AC 2
Mrlhil chloionirlhtl rlnre. XT Srrhon 520!*
Mrlh>l namdr XT acrtomtnlr
Mrlh\l 2<>anoacr>lalr 2
Mrlhilnclohrianr 400
Mrlh>lc>clohrianol imrla and paia iiomri muturr' 30
«.Mr.h,lc.clohrunonr SO
2 Mrlhilcicloprnladirml mjnfjnrw tncarbonil ai Mn
Mrlhvl drmrlon a miiruir olOftdimrlhil 0-l2 irlhillluo
rlh>l phoiphoiolhioalr and 00-dunriM S i2 irlh>lihio<
rlhili phxnphoicHhioalr
44 Mrthvknr biiii-chloiaanilinri XT alw Scrhon 5215
Mrthi Irnr bi> . 4« rlohrrv livori u\ air i h> diofrnilrd MDI 001
Mrlhilriir bciiphrmliionanilri
Ml>l diphrn>lnirlhjnr djnnr>anj|f 00?
Vlrlhilrnr cKlondr dichloiomrttunr XT Tiblf \l 2
tsiss
(p 4322703)
•vrW"1
IS
10
80
5
610
1.650
1.800
IS
1
3100
12
115
2
20
f>
I60I>
215
2JO
02
05
001
on
02
1
c
c
-------
J5155
(p. 432.27
Atxtnctt
Hfguoy
Kutabei"' .
101779
78333
1338234
107313
60344
748*4
iiom
108112
108101
624&J9
363804
74931
80626
298000
107879
681849
96839
t, T™
•? 7786347
to
6921224
100618
60344
1 10918
7647010
MX80303I7
91203
134127
91948
63252
2333I2A4
7440019
963122
13463393
7440U20
MIIS
7KT7372
101024)9
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8
'0.4) (N*Qlit*r M. No. 4— 1-2»4M)
Sbfl"' A'*™"1
S 4.4' Methylene diuuluie. MDA
Methyl elhyl kelone, MK1, 2 buUnooe. ethyl methyl ketone
Methyl ethyl kelooe pnoode
Melhyl (oraule
S Melhyl bydiuwe, monomethyl hydiuine
S Melhyl iodide
Melhyl iscumyl ketoae
S Methyl uobutvl arbuiol, tmelhyl-2-pentiaol.
methyl iroyl ilcohol
Methyl isobutyi ketoae, Heiane
S Methyl uocyinile
Melhyl uopiopyl ketone
Methyl meicaplui
Methyl metlucTyUle, methyl troethyt-2 propenoite
S Methyl puithion. 0.0-dunethyi * (p-mtropheoyl)
phosphor ottuaale
Melhyl piopyi kelone, ipenUnone
Methyl nJialc, Utiunethyl alicile
•IptuvMethyUtyrene. 1 methyl- l-phenylelheoe
Methyl fuUale. see Dimethyl ml/ale
Mevuphoj. let Phosdno'
Mica, jee Tible AC-3. nuiunce putmUles
Mmetil wool fiber, tee Tible AC3, nuiunce putcuUla
Molybdenum, insoluble compounds, is Mo
Molybdenum, soluble compounds, u Mo
Monoaotophos, Ajodnn*
Maoamethyluulme, set N Melhyluuliae
Monoroethylhydiuine. see Methyl hydruine
S McxpnoLne, letr*hyd/o~4)l l.4~oiuine
Murubc sod, u HO, see Hydiogeu chkmde
Nded. set Dibtom*
Niphlhi, coil In
NiphlKUene
ilpu NiphlhyUnune. 1-uphlhyUnune, see Section 3209
belt Niphthylimme. 2-niphlhylanune. see SerUoo 32D9
1 Naphlhyl N luethykubiniile, see Ctibuyl
Naphlhilene dusocyarute. NDI
Neon
Nulale', stt tlhion-
Nickel cubonyL Ni(CO),
Nickel meuJ, u Ni
Nickel, uuoluble compounds, u Ni
Nickel, soluble comuoundi. u Ni
S Nicotine, 1 roethyl-i(3-pyndyl) pynokdine
Nitric acid
Nitnc oudc. NO
ff"W
01
200
02
100
Oi
1
90
23
90
002
200
03
100
_
200
1
90
90
001
-
_
»
100
10
001
(fc)
003
_
.
.
0079
2
29
•v/v0
Oi
980
13
290
OJ3
10
240
100
203
003
705
1
410
Oi
700
i
240
240
01
10
3
OS
70
400
90
0063
039
1
1
01
03
9
U
y*
C
C
C
TITLE 8
|R*anl*i U. No
( Tic mirj
\umk-r"1 Sim""
I01UI6 S --
9W53 S
'"ill S
79241
772:3:9
10102440
71R1M2
5J6JO S
7551S
I«6U3"2
79469
6T59
1121126
8ST22
9W90 S
761162
• |(Jtv24Ti
UltU2
2ZJ4I3I S
III&59
2U6I6I2U
I4462T
77S14IT
inOiMJ6
KiHTi;
I9IMJ3 S
9WS.' S
CENtRAl. INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
PL
A.i/iir1"
pSilioamline
Kiiiobrniene
p-Niliochloiobeniene Uhloio-4 niliobenienr
4 Nitiodiphenvl iee Section 92U9
Nilioeltunt
Siliojien
Ninogen diondr
Niliofen lelioude. \|0. tee \iliOjjrn djonde
Nitrogen Iruliunde
KiliogKrrnn
\momelhane
1 Aihopiopane
2 Xinopiopjnc
\SitiowounelhiUmine iee Section 52t>9
Niliololuene
Nilrotnchlofomeihane. see chloiopicnn
Nitiout o>ide N|0
\unane
Nuiunce dulls and paihrulalei vt Table U 3
Octarhloioiuphlhalene
Ociane
Oil imincfali mill parnrulale
Oil dfffljblci muli teirepl railui ruhru nul 01 umilai
irritant oiU.. see Table \C-3 nui^nre pjrdculalrt
Oif jnu uxnu compuundi vt \iiemc. oiganic
Ounium lenoude ai Oi
Oialic acid
0»gen difluonde
Ounr
ParjfTin i*aA funtr
Pauqual lolal pailirulalet
Paralninn OOdielhil 0 ipniUophirnl phoiphniolhiojir
Parhculalr polvoclic aromalir hidrurarboni il'PUl'
ppm'"
1
"
100
Ihl
3
10
005
IOU
25
25
2
ihi
2)0
-
-
3UU
-
OOU>2
.
005
01
-
-
-
(P 432
ildl
«*«/">
3
9
1
310
-
6
30
05"'
230
90
90
II
-
1.050
-
01
1450
9,i.
ODD:
1
01
02
2
05
01'"
01
45155
1.270.5)
M
V"
C
at tx-nirnr 01 rvrlohrunr tolubln trr ( oal ui pilch tolahlet
8:«v5 S
I96J4JJT
I32lh4» i
s:Khj s
PI H MTC'hloiixJiphrixl
PIP vt Penlachlorophenul
Prnlaboianc*
Penlai hlorunj(jhlhjlrnr
PniljrliluiuphiMiol Pi P banlubnlr'
0005
_
-
001
05
05
iludfiuinielhtlinieihjiic
Iriu iiirthvloliitrlhuhr wr ]jblr U J
Prnluir
Ittkl
-------
1*5155 GENERAL IMH'STH* SAFETY OHI
(p 4327706;
OnwrV
trfutri
,\u/ttoff JK//I \4/nf *
107879
iriS4
394423
7616946
108952 S
92M2 - S
I06J03 S
101 SW
100425
I12WI
inwo s
IOB9V
O8JI1
88KT S
77K34T S
75*45
> 7KU5I2
1 76MVC!
M TTi)l40
~^ IOtfi>'T3
lUtMWl
I3I44Q]
7119122
8M4S
62tlo
I9IWI
(Cvrtl S
I4A13
83KI
10014:61
lltHA
! Pealanone wr Melhil proptl lelone
Perrhlofarlhane. trt Heixhlororlhane
Perrhkxorllulene wr Table AC 2
Perrhloiomelh)! metcaplan tnchlofomelhanelhio)
Peirhlortl fluonde. OO,F
Peilile. tee Table AC 3
Phenol
Phenolhuune dibeniolhuiine
p-Phen>lenrdiamine
rhen>l elhet vapot
Phentl rlhet-dipnentlieulertic muturel. vapot
Phenvlelh)lene. tee Sltiene Table AC!
Phen>l rl)nd>l elhei PCE 1 j-epoii-l^phenoiipropane
Phenilhtdialine
Phentl metcaptan
Phenilphcnphine
Ptmale. Thunet' 00~dnlh)l S^ieth)llhioimelh\l
phoiphotodiihtoale
Phoidnn Meiuiphoi*. J-tirbomrthon 1 p»oprn2\l
dunelhil phoiphale
Phoicene rarbonil chtoooV COCIi
PUphine PH,
PhoiphfllH Kid
Phoiphofui. )ello«
Phmphmoui oi>rhlonde
Phoiphoim penlachlonde
Phoiphofut penluulnde. P|St
Phoiphorui Inrnlonde
Phlhalir anhvdnde
m Phlhalodinitnle
Pickxam Tendon"
Picnc and 2 4 6-trwinophenol
Pipeiume duSidiochloiide
Pital' Ipnalil IJ-indandione
Plulei of Pl JroM 2piop>n I ol
brl< Piopioljrlonf wr Wlion S2W
Pioptoiut Kid
Piopoiuf vr Bj\gonb
n PiupJ aieialr
n Pio[nl al(uln>l
JOO
21(1
MO
500
TITLES
(Review M. N*.
Oamial
Autncta
Kumbn"' Sto**
1 19071
78871
10798!
75558 S
TSSffl
627IJ4
74997
8003347
1 10861
106914
I!I8J4
(08463
7440166
B9841
0794
1308171
7783791
63251
7440311
40921!
7803623
7440224
16628228
7631906
136787
62748 S
131073!
7681574
9005258
780351)
8052413
37249
100425
I39S2I7.
9014011
37501
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
re.
AW" j*»»"'
Prop**
Propylene feUoride. l^oWJoropropane 7)
Pnpyiene glycol duiittale PGDN 10!
Propylene fjytol nonomdhyl etho 100
Piopyleneimine, t-methyUnridme !
Ptopylene oode, 1,1-epoiypfopane •>
n Propyl ratiale B
Propyne. lee Mdhrlatttytenr
Pytelhrwi
Pyndine 1
Quuwne II
RDX. «* Cytfcnite
Renrcinol N
Rhodium, mill
liuoluble cwnpoundt, M Rh
Soluble talU. u Rh
• 1 A A .1;,.. ik. 1 A I* 1 1 1.,'. klniiMiliHti.il ntmmKmJtMn*!*
namef, oj^duneinyl Hl4>4iiin»oiuji«nyi| umimmNnoMe,
Koilan'. Trolene*. Nanko.'
Roan rare nldet, pyiolyw products, it (onnaldeh)rde
Rotenone, commercial
douce, itt Table AGO, maoancc parhrulale*
Rubbei nJvtnl (Naphtha) 400
Soaprtm, M Table AC-1
Selenium compound^ a Se
Sekniura heianuoride IO&
Seim'. tee Cuban)
Sibca. tee Table ACJ
Sdiron, tee Table AC-1, amonx nutm-Wa
Sibran caibide. SiC lee Table ACJ. ouiunre ptrbcubto
Silicon lettahydnde; auane 15
Silver metal, u A|
SJvti, loluble rompoundt, • A|
Sodnnuide II
Sodium bisulfite
jouium a,T-oxTHOfopnenoajTtnyi Hiiaie, ui( wiMLiur •
Sodium fluoioaceUle. Compound 1080*
Sodium kydroode, auitic nda
Sodium meubuulfile
Starch, M Table AC-1. Buiunrt partiruUla
Sbbine.SbH, 01
Stoddaid nlvcnl I0n
Strychnine
Styrrne(nionomef), phefiyiriliylrne. tec Table AC 1
SoUJinm (u puie cryrtuline ptoteolytic enr)ine>)
Surroie. ire Table AC-1, nimanre partirulatei
(p. 432
nr/W*
390
180
J
90
110
3
13
04
43
1
II
1001
HI
01
1
1.600
11
04
IT
II
001
01
3
10
006
i
3
03
323
015
0(01%
t»l»
&'
c
c
c
-------
{5155
(p 432.270.8)
OtemiaJ
Alatncti
JlfguOy
A'umArr"1 JJhn(kl
7446095
(551624
7664939
ld025679
1714227
7783600
2699798
8065483
93765
7440257
1314610
78308
384849
3689245 S
T783804
•p 107493 S
1
K> 7W76
oo
76119
76120
79045 S
127184
5805
IJ15SC
3689245
78002 S
107493
109999
75741 S
I 15775
J333S26 S
137268
509148
7722885
479458 S
S
I09W9
2SMC2
9bttfi
iiszn
68111
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
|H»eUt»
J
AW
Sulfur dionde
Sulfui heu/luonde
Sulfunc tod
Sulhit monochlande; S,C1,
Sulfur pentiJIuonde; SiFit
Sulfur lebiiluonde
Sulfuryl fluoride. SO.F,
Syiloi, we Demelon'
1,4.5-T, 1,4,5-trichlorophenoiyicetic tod
Tile, nonwbestiform, we Title AC-3
Tile (fibroin, non-fibroui, nurture!); we Tible AC-J. abctta
Tuiujlum meUl durt. u Ti
TinUlun oode dill, u Ti
TCP, trident pr.osphilt, we Triorthacreqrl photphile
TDI, we Tolueije-i,4-diuocyiiule
TEDP, letiiflhyl dilhionopyrophasiihile
Teflon', decoropaahon product!
Tellurium ind compound!, u Te
Tellurium heziJIuonde
TEPP. letriethyl pyiophocphile. ICilmite 40*. Vtpotone*
Terphenyb
I.IX^Tetiibromoettune, we Acetylene letiibcooude
l,I.UTetiicnloro-l>dii1uoroel>ane
I.IU TetncKloro-l^dJIuofoethine, (luorocmrbon 111
I.IA2 TetrichloioelKine; tcetylene letitchlonde
Tetrtckloroelhylene, we Peicnloroethylene, Ttble AC-t
Tetrirhlorometlune, we Cuban letnchlonde, Tible AG1
TetitchloiOfuphlhiJene
Tetriclhyl djlluopyrophaiptule; vx TEDP
Tetnethyl lead, tdiielhylplumbtne, u Pb
TetrieUivl pyrophoiphile. we TEPP
Tetrahyoioturin
TebuneuSyl lead, lefrimethvlplumbane, u Pb
TebunelhyloliDethuie, we PenUerytlmlcJ
Tetrtmethyl uccuionimle (decompOBbon product
of 2^-uobmsobutyronirnle)
Telrtmethyl ihiuiu dmilfide, we Tiunm
Tetnnibomethane
Tetjuodium pyrophosphile
Tetryl, i,4,6-buubopheaylraeUiylnibuiuiie
Tntllium, toluble compound!, u TI
THK, Kt Teliihydtafurtn
Tluincl', MX Phurile
4.4'Tluobu (fclert bul>lnnncsul|
Tkuadaj)', tec bndoauUui
*nuogl)rct>lM: and
ff""
U
ipoa
\
000
01
5
-
.
_
-
-
oat
0004
03
500
500
1
_
-
no
OJ
i
-
_
_
i
TITLES
r 14. No. I*— >t»«4|
" af/H** V«'
9
6,000
I
f
Ofi
04
10
9
S
OJ
01
01
005
5 C
4,170
4,170
1
0.1
590
015
3
8
5
15
01
10
1
TITLES
(K»gUtw M. No. i
Oiawctf
AtatTKO
Aegutrr
CENEHAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
45155
(p. 432.270.9)
AW|C|
Col
137268
I346MTJ
177268
116967
10688}
584*49
1918021
800I35J
115866
75252
146138
76039
130821
71556
7900ft
79016
75694
67663
J94423
132109
76062
iff? 65
96IM
76131
78308
13121706
111448
75638
J52307
HI459
88S9I
419458
IIW67
78008
60B49
115*6
744D3J7
80*642
Thirun*; bii(dimetbyllhioctrfaimoyl) duulfide; Aruta* - 9
Tin, M|uuc compound!, u So O.I
Tin, tin ande tad ioorgtnic comDoundi, eicept SaM*, u So t
Tittnium dionde, u Ti, we Tible AC-3. ouutDce ptrucuUte*
TMTD, we Thirira
TNT. we t4,frtmutiotoluew
Toluene; toluol, we Ttble AC!
Toluene-t4-diiiocyuute, TDI 002
o-Toluidiae; o-melhyliiiiline t
'; KC Pidoftin
Toupheoe; we QJonruled ounpheae
TPP, >ee Tnphenyl phosplule
Tnbromamcilune, we Bionwform
Tnbulvl photpUte
Tiemalle, aonubatifonD, we Tibk ACJ
TncUatotccbc tad
I X4-Trichlorobenieae
UJ Trichlor»y-bo(p-chlo(0pheiiyl)eth»oe; we DDT
1,1.1 Trichlwoelhuie, we Methyl chlonrform. Tible ACt
LUTncfaloroelhuM
Tnchlwoethyleae, tnchloroethene, we Tible ACS
Tndikxofluofoaietlunc; Fluwocuboo U
Thctilaionielhine, ice Chloroform
TnchWomtlKintlhiol, we Perchloroa>etfa)rl amtipUn
Tnchloroniptithtleoe
Tnchloionitiomclhine, we QJotofucnn
i4^TnrbkKophenoiyutbc tcid, we
IX3-Tnchkxopjop««
Oi
I
lil tnflucxoelhiiK. *x Tible AOt
l phosptule. we Tnorthonayl pbospotle
Tncycloheiylba hydiouie, Pbctaia*
Tnclhylimme
TrUluoroinooobroinantethiiK
TniiK-Ujbc uhydnde
Tnmclhylbenuae, ill namen
Tnmelhyl photphile
l^.&TnmDophenal. we rVric *rid
t,4.6-Tnnitruphcoyln>clhyliutiimiae, we Trtryl
2,4.6- Tniutiolalucne, TNT
Tnoflhociayl phoiplule
Tnphmylimine
Tnphenyl phosphate, TPP
Tungsten meltl. u W
Tuiigilrn. uuoluble coropourMii. u W
Tungsten, fulublc compoundl. u W
TiupcnUnc
1,000
0005
B
t
014
t
11
I
S 40
10 45
1000 SfiOO
SO 300
|OU
5
100
6,100
004
IB
10
0}
0 1
5
3
3
3
|
-------
f SIS5
(p 43227010)
Mrfilri
Cfr.NK'IMI. IVDliSTHr SAFET* ORDtRS
.\j/nr"'
TITLE 8
l*r aj. Me. M— «-
«/"•
n,f
Cnl
'° uif"'
Dl&l
75CI4
IMM
10-CJ
7JOI4
IOTDI
l(l*~6
7US4
(luluiill.nwlublr rampoundi «>(•
Kmun liuiuiJl. iduMr con.pound> as I'
\dr
\jiudiumprnloudr (X, Oil rnnublrduil UK) (um
\( «n \intl rhlocNtr Sfclion SJIO
WfrljWr Oil mull irurp* r^slot
mil 01 umibi irnNnl wit) tr< TiMr ACM.
sm«l jrrutr
\in>lbnii«iK. iff Slvtrnr. Tiblf A(M
\ mil biomioV. bromorth> Irnr
S \nilcnlonoV.serSectionS2IO
S VinilciantoV iff Acnlontlnlr Section ttll
\ a>\ I C) rHuhrtrnr dioudr
Vin>lioVnrrhlorid> I.Nichlnoelhvlenr
V mi liolurnr
\M & P (Xanuih MArn and Puntrrsl Njphllu
30
10
5
10
10
JO
. 1 lilptu •rrlonxlbrnidroitroumjnn
Ufldin|| lumo lotj cucticul^m
Itmhomditidiulroninrurnlii
Wood dull liKm illrrfirnK i
Xttrnr tiloi dimHh> Ibrnimr XT T^btr At 2
m \>lfiH'-a a -duminr
Xtlidinr *minodimflh)lbroirnr
01
02
175
005"'
X
10
60
40
140
113(1
01
5
5
01
10
Illnum compounds
TITLE 8
in»ei»t»* A>. M».
.Itxrrjcl,
.\ufi,tr,'" Sl,n*
1646K57
IOSJ06M
1314132
551051
148016
UKXKRAU INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS
*-»>»•>,
AW ppn
Zinc cMonoV (KIW
Zinc chronulr u O
Zinc oudr fumr
Zinc ittariit . see Tiblf AC-3. nuisanrr pirliruUlrs
Zirconium compounds. i> Zr
Zoalrnr'. ice 3>duurtoV
45155
(p 432270 U>
«1'"
Cnl
»"' rn/r'W'0 V
1
005
!
J
U) The Owmirjl Abstract! Service Rrgistry Numbri is • designation u>ed to identif)
• sprcifir compound ot tubsUnce frgirdlrsj of Ihr naming system, these numbers uere
obtained from the Desk Top Anal)sis Tool (or Ihr Common Data BJSP and (rom the
Chemical Abstracts lnde>e>
(bl Rr(er to Section M55(d) (or the significance of the Skin notation
(c) Registered trademark names are indicated b> an asterisk (*)
Id) Fur the definition and the application of the Permissible Eiposure Limit (PEL).
refer to Section 5155(b) and (c)U>
(el Parts of pas or \apor per million parts of air b> volume at 25* C and 760mm llg
pressure
(fl Milligrams of substance per cubic meter of air at 25* C and 760mm Hg pressure
(f) Refer to Section 5l55lb| and lei (3! for the significance of the Ceiling notation
(h> A number of gases and vaporv. when present in high concentrations, art primaril>
as asplniiants without other adterse effects A concentration limit is not included for
each material because the limiting factor is the a\ ailiblr ox\ gen (Set era! of Ihesr maleri
als present fire or eiplosion hazards )
(i) Coal-tar pilch \olaliles (benzene or cyclohetane soluble fraction) include poUmi
clear aromatic hydrocarbons (tome of which are known carcinogens) that evolv e u|>on
healing the distillation residues from coil lai
(j) This standard applies to the production and use of yarn. felt, and balling from
unwashed waste cotton fibers It does not appl) lo cotlon gins, cottonseed oil induslix.
or operations co>ered b> Section 5217
(k I A PEL limit of 005 ppm shall appl) lo exposures involving a molure of ethxlenc
glvcol dmilrale and mlrogUcerin
(/) As sampled b) method that does not collect vapor
(ml Thermal decomposition of the fluorocarboii chain in air leads to the formation of
ondned products containing carbon, fluorine and o» gen An mdei of eiposure to thedrol\sis followed b> a quantilali\e determi
nation of fluoride ionicnl No particular coucenlralion limit is specified ponding e\ alua
lion of the loncilv ol the products but concentrations should be kepi below the sensihx il>
o( the anal\lical method
(n) The concentration and percentage of the paniculate used for this limit arc drier
mined from the fiaction passing a ittr selector uilh the following rhjfjf (cutties
Aerodt ntinic Dumeler
in Wicronictrr* Pfrcrnt
lunil dfntil\ inhere* Piutmf Selector
<2 90
25 75
35 5
-------
^5155 CiEXLHAL INUUSTIU SAhETl HHDLHS TITLES
(p 432 27U I? I IH.gill.rH. No
TMII.I \C 2
EM I HSION I.M'OSl HLS
ft l
SL/i"
Sub>l*ncr
'".»' "
iimil
DuutiM
Limn
S
-Irrlir and 10
Urionr 750
Bcnifnf 10
britlltum and U'rvllium
c umpoundt a-- Hf —
Cadmium duM» aj ( d —
Cadnnum ullt al Cd —
Ciibon djtulfidr 10
Caibon monoudr 50
Carbon ifnarhlondr 5
p DichlcirobtT.irnf 75
Huuiooitwn 12 |fl(li
Elhtlrnc dichlundr 10
H>diuer-n Julltdf 10
Mfrcun JUI, as Hf OOUI
Mt'rcun all (oim>
furpl jIM
a.* II; tape.
Mricuit lartl and
moreanu rompoundM
Mrih.l alcohjl
2Ud
Mrihil chloiulorm
Melh'lew chluiidr
PrrchloiK-lhilcnf
SMrnr imonumeii
Tt/lurnr
Tnchloioflh-Jfnf
I.IJTnchloro
(21 mfluoioelhanf
f luoiocaibon 113 I (In
Xvlfiif 100
50
J50
I in
5(i
iou
!(u
23
23
IT*'
30
ODD:
OU3
0(13
30
55
30
43(i
493(1
001
01
60
105
O/
135
Si ppm
25 ppm
30 ppm
3U'ppm
23 ppm
100 ppm
2*«lpplh
III' ppm
2u ppn.
610 ppm
23 ppm
2(li ppm
5(«i ppm
*U ppm
2»ippiii
2in ppm
ill ppm
5(1 ppm
i mm 8 hit
10 mn 8 hit
OOU3mc M* 30mm 8 hit
30 mm h hi
15 mm 8 hi
i mm 4 hi
i min 3 hi
30 mm S hi
3 mm 3 hi
10 mm 6 hit
30 mm ti hit
5 mm 6 rut
S nun 3 hrt
5 nun 2 hrt
i nun 2 hrt
5 mm 3 hit
5 mm 3 hit
10 niin ^ hit
5 mm 2 hit
4(1 ppm
3(Ulppm
SO ppm
0(C3mp M1
06m; M*
06mp \l'
Iou ppm
«•> ppm
2ui ppm
20u ppm
63»l ppm
2>t> ppm
50 ppm
OlMnic M*
Olm; M'
I.Ovii ppm
5il ppm
Jlli ppm
8U> ppm
I.Oli) ppm
in ppm
Vli ppm
5UI ppm
75 ppm
^ l«i Rrfrt lo Srlion )IUid< Iw Ihr ufnthctnir of ihr Skin
Ibi f Di the drfiixition «nd llir apptu^non o^ Ihr Primiitibl*
1C..Ii
it( PtiU ol fit ot t *poi prt million |>4Mt o( «n b\ t i.lun.r
ld> V|illi0i«ini ol lubtunfr pri cubu nirlri ol 411 ^1 W I t
iri f ,r.,uin (ocunirnii^...!.. -b,.>t ll.f rirui.i..,, lnn.1
foi « hmr prnud nol lu ritrrd Ihr nruition duulnui
An rnipl»\rr mn b«- ripoti>l In 4 ronrriil(alur rt|.
Irli4( riicndi < »ni rnlidliuni Irti ihdn 10 ppn. dunnp (In uinf
IU ppn*. it not rtimjfd
I .V" ppm 30 nun 1 hit 2U»ppm
21' ppm 30 mm b hit 3LKi ppm
nuljlinii
tiputufr l-iinil iPLI > irlri lo Srrhon M^^lb> and
«l ^* I jiul ~f»i lino H|l plrtiulr
lid 7hll nun tin plr>tuli
but n.'i r«irrdn,^ llu irilinit limil dir prMiiillrJ
ti^( l.lofnl. jU.i. 2*1 ppm bul nn ri jb.nf 2mi p(.n,
^ltullll|lMlh.•^>|»ull i^iiiMiiunntlllii inil.dl
in unit b inioulr r«|Hnuir *!•"« r 2-5 pl'lli mot jli..« f
-\.nr> ino*I IM loiniM u.jiril L. ri|M .uiri lo i jiU-n
Mini a*> »ui I, :lul Ihr ^iniitiiblr ripuvuir liniil ut
TITLL 8 CENEHAL INDUSTHY SAI-ETV OHUEHS $ 5155
IR»0iit»r u. NO M—tztvui (p 43227013)
TAIILK AC 3
PEHMISSIIILE EXPOSUHE LIMITS K)H MINERAL DUS1S
SILICA
(I) Amorphous (intituling
natural dialoinaceom earth)
(2) Crvslalhne
(Quartz (reipirjbk |
Qu.irlz (loul duil)
Ciislob.ilile
Silica, TuM-d . .
Tndvmitc
Tripoli (respirjble)
SILICATES (lei-, than 1% crvjtalhne i.lit
Aibeilui, (including aclmolile. amo^ile.
anthopht Nile. chrv>olile. crocidohlc.
and Iremohle). >ee Section 520h
Graphite (natural)
Mna .
Mineral wool fiber
Perhte
Portland Cement
Soapvlone ..
Talc (fibrouv nonfibrous and mixture*)
Iremohle. nonaibe!>tiforiii
COAL iWTl'MINOlSi DUST
< 57f quartz, refutable fraction
> 5% quartz, respirable fraction
M'IS\\CI. PAIITICILATES /*/'"
300
inn MJ
10
30
TrSiOa -» 10 -PrbiO, -t 3
Use one-half the value calculated
(rum the formulae for quarl2
Use the value calculated frum the
formulae for quartz
t'sr one half the value calculated
from the formulae for quartz
— 10
%S.O, + 2
15
20
30
30
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
T.SiO,
1(1
5
(•I Millidnt of pctlK'Irt p-rt cubic (ool ol an b«irtl on imuiii|i-M uiiinlrt ruujiled b) tifhl TtrM Irchn
35 • million pjilulrt uri rubir in-rlri m pcilnlri pri rut)u rrnliinriri
Ibl Thr prirrni*---: of Sil)( 1*1 rrkiullmr tilu-11 in ihr fotmuL i> Ihr 4itiou.nl drlrfminrd fn
H I
-itbut nr uinplrt
• •ir|n 111 moir iiiii4iu'ri wnrir olhn mirlhixji h^tr brcn ihou n lo (K kpplinblr
Ol Both Ihr i on, run.l,,,n utd IKM rntiiir ol Sill, :.t 11. .tjjluir ,J,i . , u>rd lot ihu limil tir Jrlrniiiiird liont Ihr
li»clion putiiif • mr t^lrrlot wilri Ihr folio-*mp rh«t-irlriiil>i i
15
35
-------
GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8
(p. 432.270.14) (R»»i»t»r M. NO. to—»>M«I
NOTE: Authority cited: Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3. Labor Code.
HISTORY:
1. Amendment of Table AC-2 filed 6-3-80 as an emergency: effective upon filing (Regis-
ter 80, No. 23). For pnor history, see Registers 73, No 21, 75, No 48, 76. No 71, 77, No
41, 78, No. 9; 78, No. 18, 78, No. 40, 79. No. 12. 79, No 21, 79, No. 28, and 79, No. 32. A
Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAH within 120 days or emergency
language will be repealed on 10-2-80.
2. Repealer and new section filed7-2-80, effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 80,
No. 27).
3. Editorial correction of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 (Register 80. No. 32)
4. Certificate of Compliance ai to 6-3-80 order transmitted to OAL 9-29-80 and filed
10-29-80 (Register 80. No. 44)
S. Editorial correction of Table AC-3 (Register 81. No 2).
6. Amendment of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 Tiled 5-28-81, effective thirtieth day thereafter
(Register 81, No. 22).
7. Editorial correction of Table AC-1 (Chlorine/Chlorine dioxide) and amendment of
Table AC-1 (footnote K) Tiled 7-8-81; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 81.
No. 28).
8. Amendment of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 Tiled 8-4-81 ai an emergency; effective upon
Tiling (Register 81, No 33).
9. Order of Repeal of 8-4-81 emergency order filed 8-13-81 by OAL pursuant to Govern-
ment Code Section 113496 (Register 81. No. 33).
10. Editorial correction of subjection (c) (2) (B) (Register 81, No. 34).
11. Amendment of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 Tiled 9-23-81 as an emergency, effective upon
Tiling (Register 81, No. 41). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL
within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 1-21-82.
12. Certificate of Compliance ai to 9-23-81 order transmitted to OAL 1-21-82 and filed
2-19-82 (Register 82. No. 8).
13. Amendment of subsections (d) and (e) (4). and Tables AC-1. AC-2 and AC-3 filed
8-17-83. effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83, No 34).
14. Editorial correction of Table AC-1 filed 10-31-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter
(Register 83. No 43)
15. Editorial correction of printing errors (Register 84. No 4).
16 Amendment of Table AC-1 filed 3-8-84. effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register
84. No. 10).
A-31
-------
Append!x 3 . 4
Standards Regulating Carcinogens
Standard (GIS0 #) Industry, Occupation,
Operation
5208: Asbestos
Construetion/demolition,
insulation, brake repair
5209: Carcinogens Employers using the 13
listed carcinogens are
required to register
as users with CAL/OSHA
and institute and main-
tain specific procedures
in order to prevent the
harmful exposure of
workers (i.e., warning
signs on containers, re-
porting procedures for
release of a carcinogen
into the work area).
PEL
Shall not exceed 2 fibers
longer than 5 urn, per cubi
centimeter of air as deter
mined by microscopic
method .
Not specified. Controls
indicated by the standard
-are intended to reduce
exposures beneath
detectable levels.
2-Acetylamino-
fluorene (2-AAF)
4-Aminodiphenyl
(4-ADP)
Benzidine and
its salts
bis~Chl"ororaethyl
Ether (BCME)
3,3'-Dichloro-
benzidine and
its salts (DCB)
4-Dimethylamino-.
azobenzene
(Methyl Yellow)
alpha-Naphthyl-
amine (1-NA)
beta-Naphthylamine
(2-NA.BNA)
Chemical research workers
Chemical research workers,
diphenylamine workers
Dye workers, rubber, plastics,
laboratories
Polymer makers, laboratories
Polyurethane foam workers,
pigment makers
Chemical research workers,
coloring polishes, wax
products
Dye makers, rubber workers,
herbicide formulators
Chemical research workers,
coke ovens, rubber, dyes
A-3 2
-------
-2-
Standard (GISO I) Industry, Occupation,
~Operation
5209: Carcinogens, cont.
N-Nitrosodimethy- Nematocide, solvent workers,
lamine (DMN, rocket fuel
DMNA)
beta-Propio-
lactone (Beta-
prone, BPL)
Methyl chloro-
methyl ether
(CMME)
Chemists, plastics and resin
workers
Organic chemical synthesizers,
resins
Ethyleneimine Textile and paper makers,
(El, Aziridine) effluent treatment
PEL
5210: Vinyl
Chloride
(Chloroethene
5212: 1,2-
"Dibromo-3-
chloro propane
(DBCP, Fumazone,
Nemagon)
5213: Acrylo-
nitrile
(AN, Carbacryl,
VCN)
5214: Inorganic
Arsenic
5215: 4,4'
Methylenebis
(2-chloro-
aniline)
(MBOCA, MOCA,
CL-MDA, DACPM)
Rubber, workers, polyvinyl
resin, workers
Pesticide formulation
Fumigators, textile workers
Brass, bronze, copper workers
petroleum, printing, semi-
conductor industry, pesticide
formulation
Organic chemical synthesizers,
resins
ppm
ppbG
(inhalation)
skin, eyes-
no contact
2 ppm
(inhalation)
skin, eyes-
no contact
0.01 mg/m3e
10 ug/m
3f
A-3 3
-------
-3-
Standard (GISO #
5219: Ethylene
Dibromide
Industry, Occupation,
Operation
Gasoline additive, fumigant
PEL
130 ppb, no
skin or eye
contact in con-
centrations
>0.1Z EDB
5220: Ethylene
Oxide (EtO)
Hospitals, medical supply
manufacturing, fumigant
Ippm
a. CAL/OSHA Permissible Exposure Level as of September 1984
b. "S" indicates potential absorption through skin or
mucous membranes.
c. Parts of. contaminant per million parts of air.
d. Parts of contaminant per billion parts of air.
e. Milligrams per cubic meter of air.
f. Micrograms per cubic meter of air.
A-3 4
-------
Ul
t_n
SIC
1 1 1
1 19
131
139
161
171
172
173
17U
175
179
181
182
191
212
21M
2l|1
251
252
259
271
272
279
291
711
721
722
723
729
711
712
752
781
782
783
811
851
912
913
921
1021
1041
1061
1081
1099
1211
1311
1321
1381
1362
1389
I'l 11
H»29
TOTAL
SC CNTY
EMPLVNT
6
7
1 1
1
381
14
109
21
20
175
14
773
512
71
16
3
105
<4
139
13
1
16
98
9
1
16
11
311
5
12
338
87
677
700
56
23
15
5
1
2
3
1
1
2
2
M5
27
1
13
13
11*
18
in
TOTAL
SC CNTY
ESTABS
2
3
2
1
38
1*
17
6'
1
22
3
83
12
13
11
1
8
1
1
2
1
6
13
3
1
3
5
7
2
2
50
31
90
87
20
6
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
6
3
i*
?
1
BY SIZE
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FORCE<50
6
7
1 1
1
231
11*
59
21
20
65
11
5H8
1 12
71
K6
3
20
1
5
13
1
16
23
9
1
16
11
114
5
12
338
87
M71
423
56
23
15
5
1
2
3
1
4
2
2
45
27
1
13
13
1>*
18
If)
Of ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
EMPLYES
FORCE>U9
FRCE<250
0
0
0
0
150
0
50
0
0
110
0
225
50
0
0
0
85
0
134
0
0
0
75
0
0
0
0
200
0
0
I)
0
206
277
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I)
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FRCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
350
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
2
3
2
1
35
4
16
6
1
20
3
81
10
13
1>*
1
7
1
2
2
1
6
12
3
1
3
5
6
2
2
50
31
87
84
?0
6
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
5
1
6
3
1*
?
\
ESTABS
FORCE>49
FRCE<250
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FRCE>2M9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
SCIARA COUNIY tMPlOYMtNF
BY Sl^t OF FSFABLISHMLNF WORKFORCE
SIC
>
O*
1511
1521
1522
1531
15')1
1542
161 1
1622
1623
1629
71 1
721
731
7'll
7')2
7'i3
751
752
761
771
781
791
793
79')
1795
1796
1 799
201 1
2013
2022
202M
2026
2032
2033
203»4
2035
2037
2038
201(7
20')8
2051
2052
2065
2076
2077
20/9
208')
20B5
?0fl6
2087
209 1
2097
101 Al
SC CNIY
EMPLYM1
23
I)
3802
5/5
397
961
1279
968
330
720
430
1)015
1 125
3471
32M
1883
323
160
1)8 ')
1U25
1319
36
327
3/6
201
13')
50
133'l
19M
l')7
101)
67
55
161
2591
576
596
30
9
5
99
829
27
'1 9
l)
20
83
889
'15
351
9
I'll)
38
10IAI
SC CNIY
ES1ABS
2
|
886
69
71
67
123
101
1 1
56
1)2
340
196
286
63
168
65
l)U
95
150
116
1 1
1')
51)
65
1 1
9
218
3
7
2
6
2
2
15
a
5
1
2
1
9
17
3
5
1
2
1
25
1
')
2
1
2
IMPI Yf S
IN CNIY
FORCK50
23
0
3192
385
337
601
928
703
30
36'l
1 /I)
2095
965
2001
32')
122B
238
160
l)2i)
872
699
36
202
238
201
7')
50
116')
')
87
1)
67
55
1
137
36
1)6
30
9
5
99
109
2?
1)9
')
20
0
159
'15
9
9
()
38
I HIM YtS
(ORCt>')9
fHCE<250
0
0
610
190
60
360
351
265
300
356
260
1570
160
1 120
0
655
85
0
60
553
620
0
125
138
0
60
0
1 70
190
60
100
0
0
160
l)5'l
250
150
0
0
0
0
3/5
O
0
0
O
83
80
0
3') 2
O
HlO
O
IMPLYES
IN CNTY
FRCE>2'l9
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
350
0
350
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
290
1)00
0
0
0
0
3D5
0
0
0
0
0
650
0
0
0
0
0
t SIABS
IN CNFY
FORCE<50
2
1
878
66
70
62
118
98
8
52
HO
32')
193
273
63
158
6')
l)l)
94
1'|2
108
1 1
13
52
65
10
9
215
1
6
1
6
2
1
9
5
3
1
2
1
9
11
3
5
1
2
0
22
1
1
2
0
2
t SIAHS
FOHCI_>!(9
FRCE<250
0
0
a
3
1
5
5
3
3
l)
2
15
3
12
0
10
1
0
1
8
a
0
1
2
0
1
0
3
2
1
1
0
0
1
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
1
0
(SI AI1S
IN CNIY
FRCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
-------
BY SIZC Of ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
SIC
2098
2099
2211
2221
2241
2253
2261
2262
2271
2291
2296
2323
2328
2329
2331
2335
2337
2341
2361
2369
2385
2386
2389
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2399
2431
2(434
2M41
2M48
2449
2451
2452
2499
?511
2512
2514
2515
2517
2519
2521
2522
253)
2541
2542
2591
2599
26? 1
2631
TOTAl
SC CNTV
CMPLYMT
7
825
65
30
1 1
2
5
6
5
5
1
3
3
20
28
11
2
7
1
3
1
5
3
92
35
30
20
5
10
72
292
349
91
132
32
40
24
203
189
53
3
77
5
14
108
4
5
318
58
124
130
61
145
TOTAL
SC CNTY
ESTABS
1
21
8
5
2
; •
2
3
6
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
8
5
1
3
2
2
9
45
67
8
10
5
1
6
38
29
7
1
6
1
3
16
1
2
41
7
3
14
3
3
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
7
220
65
30
11
2
5
6
5
5
1
3
3
20
28
11
2
7
1
3
1
5
3
92
35
30
20
5
10
72
237
299
91
132
32
40
24
153
189
53
3
77
5
14
108
4
5
238
58
19
130
61
35
EMPLYES
FORCE>49
FRCE<25O
0
230
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
0
105
0
0
1 10
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FRCE>2M9
0
375
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
1
17
8
5
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
6
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
a
5
1
3
2
2
9
44
66
8
10
5
1
6
37
29
7
1
6
1
3
16
1
2
40
7
1
14
3
2
ESTABS
FORCE>U9
FRCE<250
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FRCE>249
O
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
BY
SCI AHA CUUNIY IMHI OYMENT
SI/L OF ISIAULISIIMLNf WORKFORCE
I
U)
CO
SIC
?641
2643
2645
2647
26118
261(9
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2661
271 1
2721
2731
2732
2741
2751
2752
2753
2754
2761
2782
2789
2791
2793
2795
2812
2813
2819
2821
2822
2831
2833
2834
2801
2842
2844
2851
2869
2H/3
2874
2875
2B79
2891
2893
2899
295 1
2952
301 1
3041
3069
30/9
10IAI
SC CN1Y
EMPLYMF
100
61
22
350
77
48
17
1
603
150
50
0
2325
1017
645
2
213
829
1652
35
2
231
266
87
257
28
16
3
39
636
303
34
205
135
1097
144
85
53
189
232
53
8
9
1008
96
5
96
99
19
2
1
4/6
2HH8
TOFAl
SC CNIY
ESIABS
8
2
1
2
2
6
2
1
10
1
1
1
22
36
47
2
20
1 10
207
7
1
8
4
7
34
2
1
1
3
17
4
2
4
2
14
4
10
5
10
5
4
2
1
3
3
1
9
3
3
1
1
a
120
EMIM Yt S
IN CNIY
FOHCt<50
100
2
22
0
23
48
17
1
107
0
O
0
126
367
330
2
143
564
1202
35
2
73
16
87
182
28
16
3
39
76
53
34
20
0
103
43
85
53
189
12
53
8
9
8
10
5
96
34
19
2
1
/6
1202
IMPI.YES
FORCE >49
mCE<250
0
59
0
350
54
0
0
0
496
150
50
0
599
330
315
0
/O
265
450
0
0
158
0
0
75
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
185
135
232
J01
0
0
0
2?0
0
0
0
0
86
O
0
65
0
O
O
O
1686
FMPI YES
IN CNTY
FKCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1600
320
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
500
250
0
0
0
762
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
1000
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
4OO
O
ESIAUS
IN CNIY
FORCE<50
8
1
1
0
1
6
2
1
6
0
0
1
14
32
44
2
19
106
201
7
1
6
3
7
33
2
1
1
3
15
3
2
3
0
10
3
10
5
10
4
4
2
1
2
2
1
9
2
3
1
1
/
IO5
ESIABS
FOHCE>49
FRCE<250
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
4
1
1
0
6
3
3
0
1
4
6
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
O
O
O
O
15
ESIAUS
IN CNIY
FRCl>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
-------
BY SIZE OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
I
U)
>Ł>
SIC
3111
3113
3149
3171
3172
3199
3211
3229
3231
32«4l
3253
3259
3261
3269
3271
3272
3273
3261
3291
3292
3293
3295
3296
3297
3299
3312
3315
3321
3322
3325
3339
33'H
3353
3356
3357
3361
3362
3369
3398
3399
3MI1
3U12
31(21
3H23
3<425
3D 29
3'431
3'l32
3'l33
3'1'H
3«Hl2
TOTAL
SC CNTY
tMPLYMT
1 1
3
2
5
2
15
38
307
86
525
77
2
20
"49
27
33
265
320
18
92
66
2U
67
900
M
6
39'4
75
22
10
3
35
80
2
16
203
182
67
74
2<4
12
0
M
6
119
75
22
10
3
35
15
2
16
78
132
67
9
28
7
79
67
2
32
6
102
2
2
90
2?/
96
109
EMPLYES
FORCE>19
FRCE<25O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
120
0
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
58
256
0
69
52
0
55
0
0
0
275
0
0
0
0
0
65
0
0
125
50
0
65
0
58
150
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'185
100
0
EMPLYCS
IN CNTY
FRCE>2M9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
525
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2500
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
2
1
1
1
1
3
2
11
19
1
2
1
1
1
9
M
17
7
(4
3
1
2
2
0
1
2
5
3
2
1
1
6
3
1
3
7
7
M
3
2
3
3
M
1
7
1
1 1
1
1
10
21
10
6
ESTABS
FORCE>M9
FRCE<250
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<4
1
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FRCO2M9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'1
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
BY
SCI.AHA COUNIY 1 MI'l OYMt NT
SIZE Of ESIAHLISIIMENt WORKFORCE
I
.c.
o
SIC
3444
3446
3'1'lS
3451
3452
3'(62
3465
3469
3171
34/9
3484
3489
3493
3494
3U95
3'i96
31198
31(99
3511
3519
3523
3531
3532
3533
3535
3536
3541
35'i2
3544
35'l5
35'l6
3549
3551
3552
3553
3555
3559
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
356 /
3569
35/2
35/3
35 /'i
35/6
35/9
3582
3585
3589
1OI Al
SC CNIY
EMI'LYMI
1521
84
i|
39
59
55
>l
305
1034
660
5
6
34
133
105
136
40
552
2350
6
172
197
a
14
50
8
102
21
528
384
a
163
280
2
128
2/
101 /
300
83
5
42
16
32
405
300
70506
1343
16
232
14
1
42
144
TOIAI
SC CNIY
ESIAUS
90
9
1
7
8
2
1
19
57
40
2
1
2
14
4
15
2
26
1
2
a
a
4
1
7
1
18
4
32
22
1
a
20
1
2
3
36
6
3
1
6
4
3
21
1
310
5
2
a
2
1
4
1 1
f MPL Yl S
IN CNIY
FORCE <5i
10/6
84
4
39
59
1
4
150
634
410
5
6
34
133
55
136
40
312
0
6
47
77
8
14
50
a
102
21
298
134
8
108
180
2
3
27
391
25
13
5
42
16
32
180
0
2986
/4
16
32
14
1
42
144
IMPI YES
U>KCE>49
fRCE<250
445
0
0
O
0
54
0
155
0
250
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
240
0
0
125
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
230
0
0
55
'100
0
125
0
326
0
70
0
0
0
0
225
0
70/3
69
1)
200
0
0
0
0
EMPl YES
IN CNIY
FRCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2350
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
275
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
60447
1200
0
0
0
0
0
0
IS1AUS
IN CNIY
FOHCE<50
85
9
1
7
8
1
1
17
56
37
2
1
2
14
3
15
2
23
0
2
7
6
4
1
7
1
18
4
31
21
1
7
19
1
1
3
30
5
2
1
6
4
3
19
0
206
3
2
7
2
1
4
1 1
ESIAUS
FORCt :-49
FRCE<250
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
68
1
0
1
0
0
o
0
ESIAHS
IN CNfY
H»CE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
36
' 1
0
0
0
o
0
0
-------
SIC
3592
3599
3612
3613
362 1
3622
3623
3629
3631
3631
3635
3639
36*1 1
3 6*1 3
3611
3615
3617
3651
3652
3661
3662
3671
3672
3673
3671
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3691
3692
3693
3691
3699
371 1
3713
371«4
3715
3721
37214
3720
3731
3732
3751
3761
3769
3792
3799
3811
3822
3823
38214
IOIAL
sc cwrv
EMPLYMT
7
6337
1 182
190
530
3914
2
181
(4
13
2
35
2'iB
102
25
2
6
(42143
306
<4387
23075
160
30147
61
52187
6
39
218
60
23819
180
16
1860
27
670
2599
37
290
5
9
2602
10
22
39
17
20010
165
21
16
1680
101
?9?3
11
IOFAL
SC CNTY
ESTABS
2
610
9
9
3
13
1
10
2
3
1
1
9
5
3
1
2
27
8
32
159
1
3
1
265
1
2
11
1
371
1
5
12
5
21
10
1
20
1
2
3
3
1
1 1
1 1
2
2
1
1
12
1 1
58
5
BY size"
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FORCE<50
7
1609
82
110
30
159
2
51
1
13
2
35
88
22
25
2
6
160
29
301
1233
0
17
61
2163
6
39
118
0
3579
5
16
21
27
95
29
31
180
5
9
2
10
22
39
17
10
10
21
16
?63
101
621
11
OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
EMPLYES
FORCE>19
FRCE<25O
O
1728
150
50
0
235
0
130
0
0
0
0
160
80
0
0
0
283
0
129
3922
160
0
0
5627
0
0
100
60
8895
175
0
316
0
575
70
0
110
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
953
0
171
I)
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FHCE>219
0
0
950
0
500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3800
277
3657
17920
0
3000
0
11397
0
0
0
0
11375
0
0
1520
0
0
2500
0
0
0
0
2600
0
0
O
0
20000
125
0
0
3161
0
18?5
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE <5O
2
623
6
a
2
11
1
8
2
3
1
1
8
1
3
1
2
• 19
7
26
1 10
0
2
1
181
1
2
12
0
275
2
5
7
5
16
8
1
18
1
2
1
3
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
?9
1 1
50
5
ESTABS
FORCE>19
FRCE<25O
0
17
1
1
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
36
1
0
0
52
0
0
2
1
81
2
0
3
0
5
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
9
0
5
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FRCE>219
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
13
0
1
0
32
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
3
0
-------
SCLAHA COUNIY EMPLOYMENT
BY SIZE Of ESIABLISMMENT WORKFORCE
I
4i
K)
SIC
3825
3829
3832
3841
38'l2
3843
3851
3861
3873
3911
3914
3915
3931
3942
391*14
3949
3951
3952
3953
3955
3961
3962
3963
3964
3991
3993
3995
3999
4011
41 11
4119
4121
4131
4141
4142
4151
4171
4212
4213
4214
4221
4222
4224
4225
4226
4231
4423
4454
4469
451 1
4521
45B2
4583
101AI
SC CN1Y
EMPLYMF
6068
407
1 122
2060
467
133
556
1663
71
86
7
6
122
9
109
203
27
9
51
14
3
13
35
9
3320
144
21
2375
42
9
122
96
1
21
105
94
14
1525
3865
911
35
674
43
654
355
173
10
1
12
241
l\
1O5
34
TOTAL
SC CNTY
ESTABS
106
24
30
36
15
14
1 1
29
7
25
2
1
4
5
12
34
2
2
13
1
1
3
1
3
4
16
2
85
2
2
9
6
1
3
3
2
1
258
130
42
1
4
5
46
7
4
1
1
4
12
9
12
2
FMPl Yl S
IN CNIY
FORCl <50
929
197
267
307
137
33
56
208
71
86
7
6
1 7
9
49
203
27
9
51
14
3
13
35
9
20
144
21
515
42
9
122
46
1
21
105
34
14
1248
1059
453
35
74
43
355
55
63
10
1
12
106
71
10'j
34
IMIJl YES
FOKCE>49
FRCE<250
2176
210
355
803
330
100
0
455
0
0
0
0
105
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
610
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
60
0
277
691
458
0
0
0
299
300
110
0
0
0
135
0
O
0
FMPl YES
IN CNIY
FRCE>249
2963
0
500
950
0
0
500
1000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3300
0
0
1250
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2115
0
0
600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ES1ABS
IN CNIY
FORCE<50
83
22
25
25
12
13
10
21
7
25
2
1
3
5
1 1
34
2
2
13
1
1
3
1
3
3
18
2
77
2
2
9
5
1
3
3
1
1
253
119
36
1
3
5
43
5
2
1
1
4
10
9
12
2
ESIABS
FORCF>49
FRCE<250
19
2
4
9
3
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
5
8
6
0
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
O
0
ESTABS
IN CNIY
FRCE>249
4
0
1
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
,0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
-------
BY StZE^Or^EsVABLISMMENT WORKFORCE
I
*.
LJ
SIC
1712
1^/22
11723
1712
1782
1783
'1/89
1(811
(4821
'1832
>4833
0899
1923
192)4
1931
1932
1911
1953
1959
5012
5013
5011
5021
5023
5031
5039
5011
5012
5013
5051
5063
5061
5065
5072
5071
5075
5078
5081
5082
5083
5081
5085
5086
5087
5088
5093
509M
5099
5111
5112
5113
5122
5133
TOTAL
SC CNTV
CMPLYMT
359
1151
58
5
1
111
2
159
15
268
265
753
6
3
15
2307
528
186
39
216
1661
213
378
112
119
739
370
171
58
283
1199
308
5121
352
505
121
72
2913
166
10?
1 123
381
1091
113
155
372
161
13M
101
291
213
173
6?
TOTAL
SC CNTY
CSTABS
16
18O
6
2
1
3
1
a
7
17
6
20
1
1
1
2
10
17
10
26
200
23
37
11
56
69
11
17
11
33
128
29
163
50
17
17
to
237
23
25
151
19
91
53
18
21
35
167
6
36
21
?B
11
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
119
1151
58
5
1
11
2
11
15
268
75
193
6
3
15
7
13
13/
39
176
1315
213
217
262
391
5/9
2/0
121
58
230
999
238
2861
352
505
121
12
1853
166
102
9/3
381
590
353
90
162
161
1001
1 1
211
189
218
6?
EHPLYES
FORCE>19
FRCE<25O
210
0
0
0
0
0
0
115
0
0
190
260
0
0
0
0
185
319
0
10
316
0
131
150
55
160
100
50
0
53
500
70
1810
0
0
0
0
1090
0
0
150
0
501
60
65
210
n
370
90
50
•>219
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
0
0
0
2300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
750
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
11
180
6
2
1
3
1
1
7
17
1
17
1
1
1
1
7
13
10
25
196
23
35
13
55
67
10
16
11
32
122
28
113
50
17
17
10
226
23
25
151
19
86
52
17
19
35
163
5
35
?3
?6
11
ESTABS
FORCE>19
FRCE<25O
2
O
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
6
1
18
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
3
0
5
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
'2
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FRCO219
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
0
0
0
f)
0
0
-------
SGI AHA COUNIY EMHIOYMENF
BY SIZE OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
SIC
5134
5136
5137
5139
5 I'll
5142
5143
51'I'I
5145
5146
5 I'l 7
5148
5149
5152
5153
5154
5159
5161
5171
5V72
5181
5182
5191
5194
5198
5199
521 1
5231
5?51
5261
5271
5311
5331
5399
5411
5421
5422
5423
5431
5441
5451
5462
5463
5499
5511
5521
553.1
5541
5551
5561
55/1
5599
561 1
TOfAl
SC CNIY
EMPLYMI
90
61
56
18
515
156
392
174
66
3'l
492
494
730
7
2
0
4
623
45
190
309
364
269
1 13
208
5917
1539
267
1781
451
141
5/47
375
632
5040
2
37
188
//
106
127
598
19
338
4288
235
I05/
2224
10O
195
2/1
151
544
IOIAI
SC CNIY
ESTABS
5
19
22
3
65
15
17
9
17
7
21
36
62
1
1
1
2
76
8
21
8
14
IB
5
22
196
86
59
76
62
24
37
18
33
376
1
3
51
15
23
19
78
5
63
103
66
206
414
22
26
45
29
103
IMPl Yl S
IN CNIY
FOHCL<50
5
61
56
1H
410
156
146
74
66
34
158
134
445
7
2
0
4
538
45
190
75
64
115
18
208
1009
628
267
581
451
141
140
115
190
2730
2
3/
188
77
106
12/
418
19
288
1 186
235
105/
2164
10O
195
2/1
151
544
1 MI'LYt S
IOHCE>49
IKCE<250
85
O
0
0
105
0
246
ion
0
0
334
360
285
0
0
0
0
85
0
0
234
300
154
95
0
358
411
0
0
0
0
2467
260
142
1460
0
0
0
0
0
0
180
0
• 50
3102
0
0
60
0
0
O
O
O
EMPl.YES
IN CNTY
FRCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4550
500
0
1200
0
0
3140
0
300
850
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
[ SI ADS
IN CNFY
fOKCE<50
4
19
22
3
64
15
15
a
17
7
18
32
60
1
1
1
2
75
a
21
4
12
16
4
22
189
78
59
75
62
24
10
14
30
354
1
3
51
15
23
19
75
5
62
61
66
206
413
22
26
45
29
103
FSTAliS
FOHCF>49
FRCE<250
1
O
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
2
2
1
0
6
7
0
0
0
0
17
4
2
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
42
0
0
1
0
O
O
O
O
ESIAOS
IN CNIY
FHCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
10
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
-------
I
Ł>.
Ul
SIC
5621
56 Jl
5641
5651
5661
5681
5699
5712
571J
5711
5719
5722
5732
5733
5812
5813
5912
5921
5931
5911
5912
5913
59114
5915
5916
5917
5918
5919
5961
5962
5963
5982
5981
5992
5993
599'!
5999
6000
601 1
6022
6023
6021
6025
6032
6052
6051
6059
6122
6123
6131
61'i2
6113
6 Hi '1
TOTAL
SC CNTY
EMPLYMT
1 158
73
166
158
570
12
316
1285
665
171
387
125
612
370
19875
1257
17H8
1085
585
1133
587
571
612
260
271
977
71
361
199
536
8U
8
35
582
I'l
6
2815
0
17
580
658
53
1891
IB
3
11
11
10
178
6
511
3?0
15
TOTAL
SC CNTV
ESTABS
237
18
30
29
120
2
90
189
111
37
96
81
108
73
1321
183
169
287
151
218
79
61
171
53
36
238
15
57
55
11
31
2
1
132
15
3
559
2
2
23
30
3
181
2
1
2
2
?
12
1
?8
13
U
BV SIZE
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FORCE<50
1158
73
166
158
570
12
316
1060
515
171
387
125
612
370
12617
1117
1533
1085
510
1201
117
571
612
260
163
927
71
291
199
232
81
8
35
582
11
6
2622
0
17
399
1'l8
53
3539
18
3
11
11
10
153
6
?7I
1?0
15
OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
EMPLYES
FORCE>l|9
FRCE<25O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
225
150
0
0
0
0
0
6153
110
215
0
75
232
110
0
0
0
111
50
0
70
0
301
0
0
0
0
0
0
193
0
0
181
210
0
1092
0
0
0
0
0
325
0
213
?00
0
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
. FRCE>219
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1105
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
263
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
237
18
38
29
120
2
90
187
113
37
96
81
108
73
1237
181
165
287
153
216
78
61
171
53
31
237
15
56
55
37
31
2
1
132
15
3
556
2
2
20
27
3
163
2
1
2
2
2
8
1
21
12
1
ESTABS
FORCt>U9
FRCE<25O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
82
2
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
3
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FRCE>2"49
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
SCLAHA COUNTY FMPLOYMLNI
BY SIZE OF ESlABLISHMtNT WORKFORCE
SIC
6145
6116
6153
6159
6162
6163
621 I
6221
6281
6311
6321
6324
6331
6361
63/1
641 1
6512
6513
6514
6515
6519
6531
6541
6552
6553
6611
6711
6722
6723
6724
6732
6733
6793
6794
6799
7011
7021
7032
7033
704 1
721 1
7212
7213
7214
7215
7216
7217
7218
7219
7221
7231
7241
7251
1OTAI
SC CNIY
EMPl YM1
50
140
106
241
568
434
473
42
277
254
128
70
324
310
184
3608
862
958
125
1 74
701
5361
37
1609
39
81
100
158
1
29
101
42
7
83
193
3808
41
78
15
120
153
50
287
50
1 19
753
142
167
36
204
948
108
103
TOTAl
SC CNIY
ESFABS
13
5
12
29
48
71
45
a
56
17
2
2
14
14
4
331
138
153
24
46
23
651
2
236
5
10
21
4
1
4
a
9
2
17
48
123
a
7
4
4
31
27
a
1
48
195
46
4
1 7
68
194
42
50
EMI'I YFS
IN CNIY
FORCE <50
50
140
106
191
498
434
356
42
277
132
3
20
94
1 1 1
1 1
2251
612
796
125
174
76
4396
37
1099
39
81
100
8
1
29
41
42
7
83
193
804
41
78
15
10
153
50
91
0
1 19
753
142
51
36
2O4
94H
108
103
FMPLYES
FOHCE>49
FRCE<250
0
0
0
50
70
0
117
0
0
122
125
50
230
199
173
1357
250
162
0
0
100
565
0
210
0
0
0
150
0
0
60
0
0
0
0
1206
0
0
0
110
0
0
196
50
0
0
0
1 16
o
o
o
0
o
EMPLYFS
IN CNIY
FRCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
525
400
0
300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1798
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
ESFADS
IN CNTY
FORCE<50
13
5
12
28
47
71
43
8
56
15
1
1
1 1
11
2
315
136
151
24
46
21
643
2
232
5
10
21
3
1
4
7
9
2
17
48
107
8
7
4
3
31
27
6
0
4 a
195
46
2
1 7
<>8
194
42
50
ESTABS
FORCE >49
FRCE<250
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
2
1
1
3
3
2
16
2
2
0
0
1
7
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1 1
0
0
0
1
0
0
o
1
0
0
o
2
o
0
0
0
0
ESIABS
IN CNTY
FRCE>249
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
t
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
BY SIZE OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE
SIC
7261
7299
731 1
7312
7313
7319
7321
7331
7332
7333
7339
7311
73H2
7319
7361
7362
7369
7372
7371
7379
7391
7392
7393
7391
7395
7397
7399
7512
7513
7519
7523
7531
753U
7535
7538
7539
/512
7519
7622
7623
7629
7631
7611
7692
7691
7699
7813
7811
7819
7823
7B2'i
783?
791 1
TOTAL
SC CNTY
tMPLYMT
2O 1
111
1226
19
••9
82
522
'195
321
1 13I|
101
25
519
26U5
11)30
2803
533
5267
356«4
2205
114603
l|'l99
2821
1165
1022
1735
7111
2i|3
Hl5
36
1 10
1 1 10
35
131
1717
718
220
223
28(1
136
599
31
311
205
11
10i|3
80
6'«
6'l
6
2
211
1)0
TOTAL
SC CNTY
ESTABS
26
80
165
5
6
9
22
20
35
210
31
3
77
175
106
55
6
303
93
136
177
556
53
183
51
52
623
'(6
13
7
2
200
a
16
151
181
35
35
87
31
89
13
60
H7
12
252
21
16
10
2
1
19
1 1
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
141
3<)l4
901
19
<49
82
179
200
21(4
1131
10U
25
519
872
625
253
33
23614
781
829
1115
2852
32M
1095
281
M13
2761
213
95
36
0
10M8
35
131
1717
718
220
223
28M
136
1)13
3<4
311
205
1414
880
80
6 'I
6I|
6
2
I/I)
'10
EMPLYES
FORCE>19
FRCE<25O
60
100
325
0
0
0
313
295
110
0
0
0
0
1273
805
1300
0
2153
1005
391
1208
395
1 182
100
250
897
1280
0
50
0
110
62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
186
0
0
0
0
163
0
0
0
0
I)
70
0
EMPLYES
IN CNTY
FRCE>2ll9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
500
0
1250
500
750
1775
982
11950
1252
1315
270
1491
i»25
3070
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ESTABS
IN CNTY
FORCE<5O
25
78
161
5
6
9
18
18
33
210
31
3
77
163
98
M2
5
280
78
130
156
516
38
180
. 50
ill
606
16
12
7
1
199
8
16
1)51
181)
35
35
87
3")
87
13
60
1)7
12
250
?1
16
10
2
\
18
1 1
ESTABS
FORCE>19
FRCE<250
1
2
(4
0
0
0
(4
2
2
0
0
0
0
1 1
8
10
0
21
1 1
<4
13
6
12
2
3
10
13
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
ES1ABS
IN CNTY
fRCE>219
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
1
2
1
2
8
I)
3
1
1
1
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
-------
SCI AHA COON IY IMI'IOYMINI
BY SI/E OK tSIAUL ISIIMENI WORKFORCE
Sic
f
CO
7929
7932
7933
7941
79'l8
7992
7993
7996
7997
7999
6011
8021
8031
80>|1
80l|2
801)9
8051
8059
8062
8063
8069
8071
8072
8081
8091
8111
821 1
8221
8222
8231
82'll
821(3
821)9
8299
8321
8331
8351
8361
8399
8'tl I
861 1
8621
8631
66'i I
8651
866 I
8699
HH1 1
891 I
89??
8931
101AI
SC CNIY
[MPI.YMT
19'l
1(3
51
556
115
21
285
80
201
1257
1 I'l9
2120
770
it
73
132
172
771
2577
11*272
1832
686
462
360
1 152
Hit, 3
21)57
20151
10036
1859
2N
14
1
38
'105
383
852
3l|7
356
1081
916
M2
51'l
300
2H2
7911
I'l
20/1
1479
1
I'l6?0
?853
3612
IOIAI
SC CNIY
ES1ADS
214
10
7
19
9
7
19
17
2
82
97
280
152
2
20
35
27
12
39
16
7
2
33
7U
33
18
2I44
501
15
9
3
1
1
14
27
65
28
19
l|3
38
51
7
'45
1 7
26
57
3
12'4
'42
1
513
?1
226
IMI'I Yl S
IN CNIY
fOHCf<50
19'4
'43
51
t4'l6
115
21
235
80
1
838
58'l
1359
709
14
73
132
172
82
308
0
20
0
282
310
319
213
1709
7279
170
82
2'l
'4
7
38
263
383
258
197
356
355
511
'i?
'lO'l
1 38
22 /
537
Ml
10H6
??'(
1
33116
158
133 1
1 MI'I YES
M)HCE>'I9
FKCE<250
0
0
0
1 10
0
0
50
0
200
<419
315
361
61
0
0
0
0
689
1919
667
312
236
180
50
833
150
7<48
3622
135
377
0
0
0
0
112
0
3 'I'l
150
0
3'l6
'405
0
1 10
162
55
261
0
385
255
O
20fl'l
3 '4 5
681
1 MI'I YIS
IN CNIY
fKCE>2'49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
1400
0
0
0
0
0
0
350
13605
1500
1450
0
0
0
1100
0
9250
9731
moo
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
0
0
380
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
600
0
O
9 1 50
2350
16OO
f SI AI1S
IN CNIY
EOKCE<50
2'4
10
7
1.7
9
7
18
17
1
76
92
275
151
2
20
35
27
5
16
1
2
0
31
73
2 '4
15
236
I4l42
9
14
3
1
1
14
25
65
214
17
143
32
146
7
'I'l
16
?5
53
3
1 1H
39
1
'IB6
15
216
ESI AUS
fOKCf>l|9
FRCE<250
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
6
'4
14
1
0
0
0
0
7
22
<4
14
1
2
1
9
2
a
50
2
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
2
0
5
5
0
1
1
1
2l49
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
11
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
9
l|
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
O
5
'f>
2
-------
APPENDIX 5
EXPOSURES TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IN SELECTED INDUSTRIES
WITH HIGH SANTA CLARA COUNTY EMPLOYMENT (>300) AS SHOWN BY
FEDERAL OSHA INSPECTION DATA.
Source: Federal OSHA MIS, 1979-82.
Appendix 5 shows the substances and exposure levels found in federal OSHA inspec-
tions from 1979-82 for all SIC's identified in Table 4-11 (in Section 4). Included are 1)
SIC's in the most hazardous 20% of industries identified by the NIOSH Industrial Risk
Index (IRI); 2) SIC's in the most hazardous 20% of industries identified by the OSHA
Weighted Index (OWI); 3) SIC's in the most hazardous industries identified by the Inspec-
tion-Based Exposure Ranking (IBER) system; 4) SIC's with high (i.e., mean exposure > PEL)
exposures to a particular substance according to federal OSHA MIS data; or 5) a combina-
tion of 1) - 4). In addition, SIC's 3674 and 8062 are included by virtue of high Santa
Clara County employment and special characteristics of these industries. Substances are
listed by IHFOM number; a key to IHFOM numbers is given in Appendix 6. A key to
SIC's (Standard Industrial Classification Codes) is given in Appendix 11.
A-49
-------
APPENDIX 5
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SOLAHA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
b
SUUSI
.j
320
686
1590
1903
1953
21460
2590
9010
9020
9130
9135
SUBST
360
^ 70°
•f 1520
6, '590
o 9010
SUBST
360
520
700
730
1520
1590
1591
1620
1903
2610
9010
9015
9017
9020
9130
NUM OF-
INSPS **
52
2
2
6
32
2
3
NUM OF
INSPS
6
1
1
1
1
2
NUM OF
INSPS
26
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
2
1
1
7
2
1
1
1
tAruauiit
NUM Of
TEST j
SAMPS U
108
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
11
76
14
3
py prtci|pc~
LArUoUHL.
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
12
2
5
1
1
3
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
66
2
14
5
1
6
6
2
14
1
1
20
'I
1
3
'4
•
MEAN
auua 1 ANUto
MAX
PROPItfc PROPTN
OF PELe OF PEL
0.31
0.00
0.05
0.146
0.00
0.01
0. 13
0.17
1.39
0.15
0.149
0.36
CHMMARV •
ounnAn i •
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
2.67
3.20
0.00
1.77
2.30
14.39
CHUMAR v •
ounnMn v ,
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
1 1 . '42
0.05
1.27
0.69
0.01
0. 12
55.31
38.35
0.02
0.00
0.00
12.60
0.00
0.00
0.56
1 .'48
7.02
0.00
0.08
0.91
0.00
0.01
0.25
0.3U
7.02
2.78
2.16
0.81
C II O C T A U f* f C
OUDO 1 /MilsC-O
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
12.98
5.00
0.00
1.77
2.30
12.98
CIIOC T AUrT *!
OUDO 1 /\nl*E-O
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
206.140
0. 10
1.60
1.10
0.01
0. 31
206.MO
•4 '4 . 14 5
0.08
0.00
0.00
85.00
0.00
0.00
1. 19
2.55
usiu i n OIL.- i
NUM INSP
f W SOME _
' SMP>PELS
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
3Md
NUM OF
INSP W h
MEAN>PELn
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME INSP W
SMP>PEL
5
1
0
1
1
HEAN>PEL
5
1
0
1
1
2 2
NUH INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
12
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
1
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
9
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
<4
b
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS •
OVR PEL1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
7
2
0
1
1
3
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
32
0
3
1
0
0
6
2
0
0
0
16
0
0
1
3
-------
INDUSTRIES WI1H HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
.
<430
700
1520
1591
18*10
9010
9013
9015
9020
9130
9135
SUBST
230
360
1491
685
687
690
700
725
731
1280
1290
1520
1590
1591
1610
1620
18*10
18*12
1890
1903
2571
2610
9010
9015
9020
9130
9135
NUH OF
INSPS
18
1
1
3
|
1
1
1
1
6
1
1
NUH OF
INSPS
69
1
1
1
<4
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
3
3
2
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
*4
9
1
Hi
2
2
EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
NUH OF MEAN MAX
TEST
SAMPS
56
3
3
8
8
2:1
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
1l4l4
2
1
2
6
1
3
<4
2
3
U
1
6
7
9
2
5
2
3
2
2
1
7
25
3
33
3
5
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.09
0. 10
11.67
0.25
0.69
0.01
0.00
0.97
0.00
O.B'I
0.17
0.19
unfiAnY. ou
HEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.98
0. 11
0.61
0.55
0. 17
0. 18
0.13
0.36
0.03
0.31
0.01
0. 1 1
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.0*1
0.03
*l.77
0.00
0.01
0.20
1 .08
PROPTN
OF PEL
15.23
0. 18
15.00
0.<4l
2.90
0.01
0.00
0.97
0.00
15.23
0.17
0. 19
QC T AMrT C
OD i Anuc. 3
HAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
M8.20
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.21
0.98
0.33
1.0*4
0.59
0.23
0.30
0.13
0.8*4
0. 10
1.16
0.02
0.33
0.0(4
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.0*4
0. 19
•48.20
0.00
0.09
O.'ll
2.8*1
USED IN SIC=
NUH INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
iicrn i u c i r*
uoLU in o I \j-
NUH INSP
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
t
1623
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
- 1 ŁQO
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
11
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1*4
0
0
0
3
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
ui
SUBST
120
230
320
«)30
1)91
560
6B5
700
730
731
930
1080
1260
1385
1520
1590
1591
1610
1781
18')0
18M2
1890
2270
2290
2390
2571
2610
9010
9020
9130
9135
SUBST
160
320
360
1)30
lt>40
6M5
686
710
730
NUM or
INSPS
96
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
5
1
it
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
D
3
1)4
1
1
NUM or
INSPS
82
1
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
tAruauKt a
NUM or
TEST
SAMPS
291
5
6
1
1
7
1
23
3
11
11)
1
1
2
2
23
2
111
11
3
16
7
2
1
10
1
15
13
6
77
10
2
rypnciiiRF' *;
E-Aruounc. o
NUM or
TEST
SAMPS
166
1
6
1)
13 •
6
3
2
2
3
unn«nr: au
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.8M
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.86
0.1)6
15.09
0.62
0.1)5
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.05
0.09
3.05
0.68
0.00
1.01
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0. 10
12.03
0.02
0.11)
0.22
1.62
0.03
MEAN
PROPIN
OF PEL
1.11
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.08
0.00
2.50
0. 1)1)
O.O2
usi nnt-to
MAX
PROPTN
or PEL
53.50
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
3.02
53.50
1.55
2. 11
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.05
0.69
3.10
3.1M
0.02
1.35
2.51
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.06
0. 10
53.00
0.06
0.28
5.50
6.21
0.01)
,DCT Aurr<:
DO 1 MPUjCO
MAX
PROPIN
or PEL
30.98
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.38
0.00
2.60
0.1)6
0.0<)
U3tU in 3IL,= 1 i
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
1
NUH OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
1
0 0
NUH INSP NUH Or
W SOME
SMP>PEL
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
2
I)
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
14
3
0
NUM OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
-------
_ .
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
>
I
SUBST
760
9214
1033
1037
1210
1385
1520
15314
1560
1590
1591
1670
1675
1690
18'I2
2037
2270
2280
2M60
2582
2585
2590
2610
9010
9015
9020
9130
9135
SUBST
260
1190
l)9l
560
630
760
1590
1591
1903
9010
9020
9130
9135
NUH OF
INSPS
1
1
2
2
1
5
1
1
1
3
6
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
10
2
8
1
2
U
3
NUH OF
INSPS
•49
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
2
30
1
1
EXPOSURE
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
1
2
3
U
1
12
2
2
2
5
13
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
6
1
1
27
2
16
2
2
6
14
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
814
5
3
2
1
3
1
1
7
1
2
56
1
1
SUMMARY:
HEAN
PROPFN
OF PEL
0.00
1. 16
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.02
0.09
0. 10
0.03
2. M 1
0^25
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.06
O.H4
H.69
0.00
0.00
0.32
10.27
CHMMARV •
ounnftn T •
HEAN
PROP1N
OF PEL
0.143
0.25
0.09
0.01
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
ii . aii
0.00
0.81)
0 . Oil
1.59
0. 10
SUBSTANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.014
0. 12
0. 13
0.05
11.00
0.25
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.39
0.20
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.2M
30.98
0.00
0.00
0.70
29.73
CUpCTAUpCC
OUDO 1 MrlljlL D
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
13.140
0.81
0.23
0.01
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.1)0
0.00
1 .60
0.58
1.59
0. 10
USED IN SIC=
NUH INSP
W SOME
SHP>PEL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
ii cm i u CIP—
UOCLJ 1 If 31 l« —
NUH INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1721
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
1711 ________
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
<4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
1
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
l)
0
1
0
1
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
2610
SUBST
(491
685
730
1385
1591
1720
2037
2590
9010
9210
SUBST
290
320
•430
700
760
1013
1781
1810
1955
2335
9020
9130
9135
NUM OF
INSPS
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
10
1
1
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
35
2
2
1
20
1
1
2
1
tArubunt
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
1
1
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
1
1
py pnciipr
LArUounc.
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
118
a
2
1
93
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
aunri ANY :
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
O.O'I
O.OU
CHMMARV •
ounriMn • .
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.06
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.014
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.03
CIIMMARV *
ounnMn i •
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.146
0.05
0.00
0.23
2.147
0.00
0.00
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 10
0.05
auoai Anut-3
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.011
0.014
CIIRCT Aupr c
OUDO 1 MrlLit- O
MAX
PROPTN
OF PF.L
0.37
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.014
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
0.03
CIIQ t T AUpfC
OUDO 1 MrlLf C.O
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
814.50
0.25
0.00
0.23
B'l.50
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o. id
0.06
UbtU IN SIL,-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
114
0
0
0
13
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
12
0
0
0
11
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
145
0
0
0
143
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
INDUSTRIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
560
686
690
731
1280
1520
1591
1620
18'42
2610
9010
9020
9130
SUBST
> 9020
1
{J1
\J\
SUBST
227
230
260
360
l|30
M'lO
1460
M91
560
685
686
700
710
720
726
730
731
NUM OF
INSPS
20
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
2
1
I|
1
NUH OF
INSPS
1
1
NUH OF
INSPS
123
2
2
EXPOSURE
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
56
2
1
1
1
3
7
1
14
1
11
2
21
1
cwpncimr
CArUoUn t
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
1
1
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
265
2
1
<4
«4
5
2
1
3
1
<4
2
14
U
1
PEL HEAN>PEL
2 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NUM INSP NUH OF
W SOHE INSP W
SHP>PEL MEAN>PEL
0 0
0 0
iiQm iu cii^ 1700 ___._.._._.._-
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOHE INSP W
SHP>PEL HEAN>PEL
21 19
1 1
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
3
2
0
0"
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
0
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
U8
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
14
0
0
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
ui
CTl
SUBST NUM
LAruaunt :
OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
830
920
1037
10140
1073
1280
1300
1360
1385
SAMPS
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
1520 14 7
1590 2 3
1591 6 11
1620
1653
1730
177M
1790
18<40
18142
2037
2038
2180
2217
2280
2290
2310
2«460 1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
14
2
3
14
3
3
4 8
2470 3 6
2190
2505
2571
14
3
1
2590 14 1 1
2610
2611
2612
2
1
1
9010 11 33
9020 25 60
9130 5 10
9135 14 7
MEAN
PHOPTN
Of
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
PEL
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.01
.00
.00
.25
.31
.91
.00
.00
.06
.00
.00
.02
.00
.00
.68
.00
.38
.26
.0(4
.00
.38
.09
.66
.61
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.63
.30
.60
.23
oainn
MAX
Ut3 U
PROPTN
OE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
5
1
8
PEL
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.00
.00
.75
.75
.90
.00
.00
.07
.00
.00
.03
.00
.00
.50
.00
.140
.'(8
.06
.00
.50
.35
.95
.80
.00
.014
.00
.00
.00
.67
.66
.60
.69
3Lu in aii.-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
2
2
fVV
NUM OE
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4
2
2
2
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
7
14
U
-------
INDUSTRIES WIIH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
I
cn
SUBST
310
t|t|0
560
1037
1590
1591
2260
2460
2590
9020
9135
SUBST
140
320
M30
»435
MUO
1460
9214
10'lQ
1380
1385
I53«4
1536
1675
2037
2270
2280
2l|60
21470
2590
9130
9135
9210
NUM OF
INSPS
17
1
;
NUM OF
INSPS
56
3
1
5
2
1
2
1
2
1
6
1
3
1
3
2
1
9
1
6
1
1
3
EXPOSURE
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
35
1
2
6
2
1
12
1
1
3
14
2
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
210
14
2
15
9
1
5
1
7
2
3U
2
5
14
9
8
2
39
8
31
5
1
16
SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
MEAN MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.51
0.00
0.05
1.17
0.00
0.09
M.38
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.00
1.26
Q1IMMAD V • dl
DUrlPlAnT. OU
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.19
0.03
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.09
0.08
0.21
0.00
0.07
0.08
0.09
0. 10
0.00
0.27
0. 16
0. 13
0.65
0.30
1 .02
PROPTN
OF PEL
18.62
0.00
0.06
1.60
0.00
0.09
18.62
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.02
1.80
USED IN SIC-2O86
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
6
0
0
1
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
1
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
6
0
0
1
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
10
0
0
2
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
1
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
5.57
0.014
0.01
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.57
0.00
0.27
0.13
0.96
0.00
0.15
0. 11
0.22
0.29
0.01
1.55
0.148
0.314
0.99
0.30
5.57
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
8
-------
ME ALT II HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES Wllll HIGH SCIARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
I
01
00
SUBST
10
130
135
110
1380
1531
1591
2037
2280
2160
2590
9210
9211
SUBST
10
230
260
320
130
135
110
160
685
710
630
660
923
1033
1037
1010
1060
1160
1170
1290
1360
1360
1538
1560
1590
1591
1620
NUM OF
INSPS
21
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
2
2
1
NUH OF
INSPS
111
1
1
3
5
9
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
5
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
7
1
5
2
1
tAI'UOUHL
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
57
3
6
1
1
3
2
1
1
7
12
5
1
3
cv Pn^iinr
CArUOUnL
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
270
2
1
6
10
28
6
3
5
1
1
13
7
1
1
11
5
5
1
2
1
1
1
20
12
10
10
1
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.07
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.07
0.00
0.00
0. 16
0.01
0.02
0.35
0.08
^IIMMAR V * Qll
OUfVlAn it 3U
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0. 12
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.01
0.38
0.29
0.01
0.00
Dai«nL,L3 u
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.59
0.00
0. 12
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.25
0.06
0.59
0.10
QCTAUPPQ II
D3l/*nLfC.d U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
2.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.11
0.39
0.05
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.20
0.05
0.00
0.06
0.09
0.06
0.09
0.07
0.01
.0.00
0.13
0.00
0.20
2. 10
2.71
0.15
O.OO
atu in aiu=«::
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
crn i u cir* o~
oLU In old— ci
NUH INSP
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
>M 1
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
»C t ____ _
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST NUM
EXPOSURE
OF NUH OF
INSPS TEST
1730
1913
1910
SAMPS
1 1
1 1
1 1
2037 6 23
2 1 70 2 3
2180 3 1
2132
1 2
2160 10 33
2505
2510
2582
3
2
1
2590 7 19
9130
9135
SUBST NUH
1
2
OF NUH OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
81 199
20
1 1
10 1 12
230
1 1
320 1 8
130 3 9
135 2 5
110
150
160
177
560
575
686
730
830
810
1033
1010 <
1050
1060
1080
1387
1190
15?0
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
3
6
1
7
5
2
1
3
1
1
3
1536 2 1
1538
2
1560 7 25
SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
MEAN MAX
. PROPTN
OF PEL
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.07
0.00
0. 11
0.00
0.11
0.02
0.06
0.69
0.01
^IIMMARV- PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOME
SHP>PEL
6
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
15
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
1590
1591
1631
1653
1720
1730
2037
2170
2263
2270
2430
2460
2572
2590
2610
5010
9135
SUBST
>
1
a\
0 170
260
360
430
490
640
685
686
720
730
790
874
1050
1060
1210
1270
1280
1430
1460
1520
1590
1591
1660
1710
NUM OF
INSPS
3
5
1
1
2
4
6
1
1
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
67
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
1
1
3
1
1
tAruauNt a
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
8
10
8
2
5
10
11
1
1
4
2
14
2
3
3
1
1
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
239
2
2
3
2
1
1
2
11
3
3
1
5
2
4
4
1
20
4
15
3
1
a
3
1
unnnnr: au
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.69
0.04
0.67
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.08
0.08
0. 10
0.03
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.25
unnAnv • ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
1. 14
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.24
8.83
0.05
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0. 14
2.93
0.20
0.02
0.01
6. 17
0.00
0.00
nai ANL.C.O u
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
5.96
0.24
1.00
0.00
0.71
0.00
0. 18
0.08
0. 10
0.03
0.00
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.25
acTAuprc ii
DdlArlt-ft-O U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
23.40
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.40
0.46
17.63
0.05
1.60
0.00
0.00
0. 14
0.00
0.70
5.30
0.87
0.03
0.01
18.00
0.00
0.00
atU in 3IL,-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
icm i M ^ i P-
DtLU lr| O 1 \J-
HUM INSP
H SOME
SMP>PEL
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
•ŁIJŁ --------
NUH OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PF.L
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
-------
INDUSTRIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST NUH OF
INSPS
1720 1
1730
1791
1797
1970
2085
2090
2210
2213
2310
2130
2160 <
2560
2561
2570
2590
2610
9010 t
9015
9050
9130 5
9135 3
1
(Ti
1-1 SUBST NUH OF
INSPS
231
10 1
10 . 1
120 6
130 1
110 2
170 2
230 6
260 3
270 1
310 1
320 3
382 1
390 1
130 5
160 3
190 7
191 1
527 1
570 1
• EXPOSURE
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
2
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
5
6
13
13
3
2
1
32
19
1
20
1
EXPOSURE
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
652
1
1
30
3
1
2
18
10
2
1
9
1
1
23
6
15
1
1
3
SUMMARY:
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.13
0.00
0.01
0.02
2.30
0.09
0.00
8.58
2.35
3.30
0.01
0. 76
0.13
0.19
2.39
0.00
0.00
0.91
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.16
SUHHARY:
HEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.92
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.00
1.31
0.02
0.56
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0. 1?
0.00
0. 32
0.07
0.00
0. ?}
SUBSTANCES
HAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.16
0.00
0.03
0.03
2.30
0.09
0.00
23.10
3.10
3.30
0.07
2.53
1.50
1.10
6.20
0.00
0.00
6.21
0.00
0.00
1.07
2.00
SUBSTANCES
HAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
72.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
2.01
0.01
2.96
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.00
0.00
1.33
0.01
1.95
0.07
0 . 00
0. IB
USED IN SIC=2B19
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
(I
0
0
3
0
0
1
1
USED IN SIC=2
NUH INSP
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
11
0
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
28
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
2
1
0
3
2
1
1
0
0
15
0
0
1
1
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
83
0
0
3
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
I
Ol
to
SUBST HUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
620 2 4
630
631
610
685
690
700
710
720
730
731
760
820
830
907
910
990
1010
1015
IQ'lO
1060
1160
1225
It
7
1
2
l!
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1290 6 12
1300 1 >4
1385 2 3
1515 2 3
1520 2 5
1560 5 19
1590 11 =Ł<
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
6
7
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
12
11
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
PEL
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT
US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
2170
2180
2210
2215
2280
2310
2390
2'l60
2'! 70
21)80
2H95
2580
2582
2590
2592
2610
9010
9013
9015
9017
9020
9130
> 9135
1
CT\
SUBST
260
335
670
685
730
1290
1560
1590
1631
1730
1912
2220
9010
9130
9135
NUM OF
INSPS
1
1
1
1
7
2
2
7
5
1
1
8
1
3
1
1
6
1
2
1
7
18
8
NUM OF
INSPS
39
;
2
9
15
EXPOSURE
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
1
1
1
1
25
2
2
17
17
1
1
75
1
t|
1
1
20
1
5
U
11
59
19
EXPOSURE
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
105
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
8
2
2
1
2
25
51
SUMMARY:
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.05
0. 11
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.06
0.15
0.06
1.52
0.00
0.00
l|.02
0.00
0.01
0.07
0.00
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.50
0.21
SUMMARY:
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.38
0.00
0.02
2.148
0.00
0.014
0. 15
0.22
0.23
0.01
0. 114
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.66
0. 36
SUBSTANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.05
0. 114
0.00
0.00
0.63
0. 12
0.31
0.63
7.10
0.00
0.00
72.00
0.00
0.03
0.07
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
6.l4l4
0.89
SUBSTANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
3.60
0.00
0.02
2. MB
0.00
O.O'I
0. 16
0.35
0.25
0.06
0. 18
O.OIl
0.00
0.00
3.60
2.32
USED IN SIC=2821
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
M
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
>4
0
USED IN SIC=2
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
M
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
6
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
11
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
6
-------
IIFALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES HUH HIGH SO LARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
cr>
SUBST NUM
tAPUbUKl a
OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
80 1814
20 2 2
123
1 1
260 7 19
300
319
<490
1 6
1 2
1 2
525 3 6
529
570
612
1 2
1 2
1 2
681 2 >l
730 2 8
846 3 8
868 3 7
871
910
926
1 1
1 1
1 2
928 3 5
1019 2 6
11140
1251
1515
1520
1536
1591
1610
1616
1620
16M6
1775
1810
1860
1984
2037
2125
2216
1 2
2
1
1
1
17
1
6
6
2
7
5
1
1
1
11
1
2310 2 4
2333
6
2*460 2 2
2571
1
2586 2 5
2610
2
2720 3 6
9010
2
9130 3 3
9135 3 11
unnAitr: au
MEAN
PROP IN
OF
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
PEL
.37
.00
.00
.78
.27
.03
.00
.014
.06
.02
.00
.00
.29
.03
.16
.31
.00
.06
.07
.15
.00
.50
.28
.114
.03
.69
.00
.00
.20
.00
.914
.23
.08
.00
.00
.20
.00
.96
. in
. 10
.00
.01
.00
. <|6
.07
. 18
.Ml
HOI «H
MAX
UtS U
PROPTN
OF
167
0
0
1143
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
51
0
0
0
0
167
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
1
1
PEL
.50
.00
.00
.70
.60
.04
.00
.94
. 10
.05
.00
.00
.147
.07
.48
.31
.00
.13
.27
.80
.00
.00
.28
.14
.03
.60
.00
.00
.60
.00
.50
.45
.08
.00
.00
.20
.00
.43
.38
.21
.00
.05
.00
.67
.14
.79
.45
atu in aii.=c:i
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
13
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
NUM OF
INSP H
MEAN>PEL
12
0
0
2
0
0
0
.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
31
0
0
5
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
-------
IILMLItl n/WLMt\tS LArUdUHt^
INDUSTRIES Wllll HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
t|6
60
120
160
230
260
290
310
320
372
110
'130
135
I)UO
160
1(78
1490
U91
5MO
590
6'l5
685
686
687
690
720
730
731
790
830
860
871
923
931
950
1013
1037
10HO
1060
1073
1 I7ri
1 190
1280
1?85
1290
1300
1371
1377
1380
NUN OF
INSPS
521
17
2
2
1
6
1
1
4
2
1
1
37
1
3
3
1
9
1
2
2
3
9
2
1
M
2
4
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
11
M
15
3
(4
1
1
6
1
2
1
U
NUM OF MEAN
TEST PROPTN
SAMPS OF PEL
1387
56
3
9
3
13
3
1
11
3
1
1
12<4
2
6
5
1
H2
2
111
1
5
11
5
1
12
^
5
3
1
15
3
1
1
5
1
5
(4
33
10
33
10
10
M
1
1 1
2
3
1
5
O.ill
0.06
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.37
0.05
0.09
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.05
0. 16
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.20
0.13
1.20
0.67
0.07
0.00
0.01
0.62
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0. 13
0.0»l
0.03
0. 12
0.03
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.72
0.02
0. 10
0.03
52.80
0.32
0.00
0.03
0.00
1.51
0.11
0.09
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
2.99
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.20
2. 10
l.llO
3.60
0. 12
0.00
0.02
1.9M
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.05
0. 10
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
O.ltO
0.39
0.07
3.50
0.20
0.31
0.00
0.06
0.26
0.80
0.05
0. 10
0. 1 1
STANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
52.80
0.32
0.00
0.03
0.00
1.51
0.11
0.09
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
2.99
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.20
2. 10
l.llO
3.60
0. 12
0.00
0.02
1.9M
0.00
0.06
0.03
0.05
0. 10
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
O.ltO
0.39
0.07
3.50
0.20
0.31
0.00
0.06
0.26
0.80
0.05
0. 10
0. 1 1
USED IN SIC=
HUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
63
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3O79
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
KM
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
133
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
«l
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
SUBST
1385
1160
1'iao
1520
1536
1538
1560
1590
1591
1593
1620
1631
1660
1690
1720
1730
1732
1750
1771
1790
18'IO
1910
1980
1990
2020
2037
2QI|0
2170
2180
2215
2230
2210
2260
2280
2390
2131
2132
2160
2170
2185
2190
2572
2580
2582
2583
2581
2590
2600
2610
2650
NUM OF
INSPS
6
1
1
3
1
1
5
12
21
1
2
1
1
1
6
11
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
15
7
3
1
30
19
1
2
1
13
1
1
1
11
1
3
3
lAKUbUHt &
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
?8
3
9
7
2
3
7
22
66
1
5
1
2
2
18
25
1
1
5
7
5
1
a
i
2
i
10
3
9
1
7
1
1
209
15
1
1
73
65
1
1
2
28
12
1
2
19
1
3
12
UMMAKY: &u
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.31
0.00
0.03
0.09
1.01
0.00
0.05
1.16
1.93
9.06
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.05
0.13
0.07
0.00
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.08
2.51
0.07
0. 10
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.53
0.10
0.00
0.23
0. 1 1
0.60
0.67
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
o.o/
1.85
dblANLlS U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.70
0.00
0. 11
0.28
1.29
0.00
0.21
16.50
52.80
9.06
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.07
0.29
0.57
0.00
0.05
1.21
0.00
0. 12
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.27
0.20
10.00
0.15
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
2.17
0.13
0.00
0.23
1.19
19.97
0.93
0.10
0.00
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 10
0.00
0.20
31.15
ill! IN &IU-J
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
10
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
1
u/y
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
I'VR PEL
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
23
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
2
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH MICH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
I
O\
SUBST
9010
9020
9130
9135
9210
SUBST
230
260
310
(430
(4 1(0
(491
520
560
685
686
730
731
lO'lO
1073
1280
1385
1(|(40
1(460
1520
1590
1591
1631
le'io
2085
2230
2280
2330
2M30
2l|60
2(190
2582
2590
2610
2650
9010
9020
NUM OF
INSPS
6
15
31
22
1
NUM OF
INSPS
85
3
9
2
2
2
8
;
;
2
1
1(4
6
EXPOSURE SUMMARY:
NUM OF MEAN
TEST
SAMPS
8
26
66
Ml
11
rvprtQUDr Q
tArUoUKL O
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
16U
3
20
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
7
2(4
1
1
1
1
(4
1
1
5
1
2
(4
5
1
28
20
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.07
0.07
0.8(4
1.26
3.36
unnARY l
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.85
0. 15
1.30
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.76
0.01
0.00
0. 1 1
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.77
M.6I4
0.89
0.01
0.00
0.60
0.23
0.00
1.65
0.03
0.08
0 . 00
O.OJ
0.09
0.00
1 .06
0.01
SUBSTANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.63
0.96
11.71
36.20
11.53
ciio c T A UP re
OUD3 1 ArlUto
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
59.00
0.140
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.0(4
0.01
0.81
0.01
0.00
0. 1.1
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.58
0.00
0.01
0.03
0. 16
2. 10
59.00
0.89
0.01
0.00
0.60
0.88
0.00
1.65
0. 10
0.08
0.00
0.05
0. 36
0.00
10. (I '4
0. II
USED IN SIC=3079
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
6
6
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
5
6
1 1
iicrn iy cir* 1000
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
16
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
(4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
15
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
t4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
(4
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
8
8
10
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
39
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1902
I
(T>
00
SUBST
9130
9135
SUBST
120
170
260
320
430
440
520
560
631
685
686
690
700
720
725
726
730
731
1073
1280
1366
1430
1480
1520
1590
1591
1620
1790
1791
1840
1842
1890
1903
2260
2290
231O
2330
2460
2470
NUM OF
INSPS
3
5
NUM OF
INSPS
195
1
1
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
5
1
2
5
1
13
2
4
8
1
2
1
3
1
18
9
10
5
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
t
2
3
1
tAKUbUHL 3
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
4
6
PVDftQIIDP Q
tArUoUnt o
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
1242
1
6
3
2
1
1
8
2
1
45
6
9
12
1
455
4
13
40
1
2
3
12
3
88
49
76
11
5
1
30
4
3
3
2
3
3
8
4
1
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.09
0.13
MEAN
PROPIN
OF PEL
0.59
0.00
0.53
0.03
1.67
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.46
0.00
0.01
0.31
0.02
0.82
0.00
1.92
0.00
0.23
0.28
0.00
0.26
0.25
0. 12
0.00
0.25
1.27
1.67
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 17
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
auuamnijtQ
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.38
0.48
QllttQTAMfTQ
OUDo 1 AnljlLO
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
118.00
0.00
0.99
0. 10
3.32
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.50
0.00
0.05
0.60
0.05
3.05
0.00
118.00
0.00
1.19
1.07
0.00
0.52
0.31
0.37
0.01
3.36
9.80
20.54
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.06
0. 14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.00
0.00
1.70
0.00
UCJLU in sii^jjj
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SHP>PEL
48
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
13
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
25
0
0
0
1
0
o •
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
289
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
211
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
13
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA
SUBST
2M90
2570
2587
2590
2610
2611
2612
5010
9010
9015
9020
90«40
9130
9135
SUBST
230
260
310
320
360
1430
1435
14140
1490
1491
590
685
686
687
690
710
720
730
731
1037
1080
1280
1380
1385
11(30
1'460
1520
NUH OF
INSPS
1
2
1
3
9
3
1 .
3
16
1
6
6
13
6
NUH OF
INSPS
29M
3
1
1
3
2
14
2
3
1
2
1
1(4
114
1
7
2
3
2
17
1
2
5
1
2
1
1
i|'i
us
EXPOSURE
NUH OF
TEST
SAMPS
6
2
1
3
38
17
1
7
1214
1
114
28
149
27
NUH OF
IEST
SAMPS
726
10
1
1
5
5
7
5
6
2
5
1
29
26
2
10
14
<4
7
142
3
3
10
3
2
1
2
1'(9
CNTV EMPLOYMENT
OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.143
0. 12
0.33
0.17
0.05
0.30
0.00
0.03
0.146
0.00
0.30
0.37
0.99
2 fy^
dIMMAR V • ^11
ounn AH T . ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.141
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0. It
1.87
0.01
0.1414
0.01
0. 16
0. 32
0.00
0.57
O.?0
0.00
0.22
0.01
0.01
O. ?3
oa i Aiii*c.a
HAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.34
0.20
0.33
0.50
1.15
0.89
0.00
0.10
7.59
0.00
1.81
1.75
22.90
53.80
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
0
1
2
14
2
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
15
0
1
2
7
7
HAX
PROPTN
or PEL
106.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.11
0.80
3.57
0.02
0.60
0.06
1 . 1| l|
3.115
0.00
1. 10
0. 70
0.00
0. 37
0.01
0.02
1. 16
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
68
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SOLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
1560
1590
1591
1610
1620
1622
1791
1840
1842
2037
2085
2170
2310
2430
2460
2532
2570
258D
2590
2610
2611
2612
•« 5010
^ 9010
-lj 9015
0 9017
9130
9135
SUBST
160
320
1430
440
160
685
686
687
690
700
730
731
790
NUM or
INSPS
2
13
24
5
16
2
1
14
2
6
1
3
14
21
1
6
2
7
1
1
•4
5
NUM or
INSPS
101
1
1
2
1
2
14
3
1
2
1
2
7
1
lAfuaunt a
NUM or
TEST
SAMPS
2
40
66
9
143
13
2
11
5
16
1
1
1
6
15
2
1
5
26
62
2
8
3
23
1
1
9
7
NUM or
TEST
SAMPS
316
1
2
6
3
5
114
14
14
6
2
3
27
1
UMMAHY I
MEAN
PROPTN
or PEL
0.02
1.63
1.25
0.02
0. 16
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.08
0.314
0.76
0.17
0. 10
0. 16
1.78
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.68
unn«ftY •
MEAN
PROPIN
or PEL
0.314
0.20
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.014
0.32
0.02
0.01
0.00
O.O2
0.90
0.00
bUUSIANUtS
MAX
PROPTN
or PEL
0.04
147.60
106.00
0.06
1.46
0.140
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.05
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.51
0.00
0.01
0. 16
•4.27
15.00
0.18
0.62
0.143
12.97
0.00
0.00
3.99
2.80
c 1 1 o c T A UP r c
OUDD 1 Anl.t-3
MAX
PROPTN
or PEL
10.00
0.20
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0. 12
0.93
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.06
5.00
0.00
uatu in a 11,=
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
6
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
5
0
0
2
1
item i u c i f
uotLU in o i (_,—
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
NUM or
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
6
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
14
0
0
2
1
3 I.!. i. ________
NUM or
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
NUM or
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
25
16
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
10
0
0
14
1
NUM or
SAMPS
OVR PEL
33
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
-------
INDUSTRIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
1170
1300
1520
1590
1591
1620
1720
1790
1840
1842
1941
2037
2085
2260
2310
2460
2571
2587
2590
2610
9010
9020
•_. 9130
7 9135
-u
(-•
SUBST
40
430
435
460
490
686
690
730
731
860
1073
1385
1460
I5?0
1590
1591
1620
NUM OF
INSPS
1
1
12
4
3
6
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
5
a
i
2
9
2
NUM OF
INSPS
42
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
3
2
1
EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
NUM OF MEAN MAX
TEST
SAMPS
3
3
51
11
12
26
2
2
22
2
3
2
1
1
8
9
1
2
11
25
2
3
26
10
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
87
3
6
5
2
2
2
5
1
3
3
1
4
1
4
4
3
3
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.08
0.31
1.59
0.80
0. 18
0.07
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.06
0.15
2.55
0.02
0.75
0.47
unn/\n T . ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.75
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
2. 35
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.37
8.55
0. 15
0.06
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.17
2.90
10.00
2. 10
2.20
0.12
0.00
0.17
0.10
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.34
0.03
0.00
0. 18
0.88
2.70
0.05
3.31
1.52
OCT AMITC
Do 1 ArH_»C O
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
42.00
0.03
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.00
0.02
0.00
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.56
42.00
0.31
0.08
USED IN SIC=3MMU
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
1
iicrn i u cir* u
UotU In o I L.— J1
NUH INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
|AO ________
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
5
6
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
6
1
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
>
N>
SUBST
1790
IB'lO
2037
2(460
21470
21490
2590
2610
9010
9020
9130
SUBST
230
1430
1435
l|60
•490
1491
685
686
690
730
731
790
860
865
1033
1037
1170
1275
1280
1371
111 30
114(40
1(460
1520
1560
1590
1591
1620
1730
18(40
NUM OF
INSPS
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
2142
1
1
1
1
14
6
214
23
1
1
2
i
12
7
1
2
1
7
1
2
2
15
tAruuuKt o
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
3
3
3
9
1
1
7
1
1
14
2
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
509
2
1
3
3
6
a
5'
51
21)
214
5
18
3
2
3
3
3
2
1
14
27
17
1
3
2
12
1
i|
14
29
unnAnr: au
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0. 114
0.08
0.00
0.06
0.05
0.51
O.M1
O.O'l
0.014
unn/\ni, ou
MEAN
PROP1N
OF PEL
0.20
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.02
0.09
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.07
0.13
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.01
0.23
0. 10
0.51
0.014
BSIANUtb U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.01
0.23
0.50
0.00
0.06
0.15
0.51
0.141
0. 1U
0.05
HCTAUrTQ 1
DO 1 MrC^LO I
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
114. 10
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.00
0. 10
0.014
1.10
0.86
0.20
1.70
0. 10
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.09
1.23
0.07
0.00
0.01
0.05
1 1 . (|0
0.23
2.80
1.33
.0.89
SlU IN MIU=
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Qrn i u c i r*—
ot.u in o i L*—
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
114
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
.JMOy
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
CVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
18142
I860
2020
2085
21MO
22MO
2260
2310
2370
21430
2U31
21(60
2il90
2570
2590
2610
2611
2612
9010
9130
9135
SUBST
160
170
230
1430
•435
l^^Q
'160
•477
(491
527
590
6PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
3M71
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
(4
0
2
USED IN SIC ill 79 — — •»•» — ••• — •»
NUM INSP NUH OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
-------
HEAL III HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLAHA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
1030
1037
1040
1060
1073
1170
1360
1385
1430
1460
1520
1560
1567
1590
1591
1620
1690
1720
1730
1810
1860
2020
2037
2085
2260
2280
2310
2460
2470
2502
2505
2584
2590
2610
2611
8880
9010
9015
9020
9130
9135
NUM OF
INSPS
1
4
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
t|
4
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
3
2
a
9
1
1
1
1
8
8
4
1
3
1
1
4
1
tAruouHt a
NUM OE
TEST
SAMPS
1
7
1
3
4
1
2
1
5
1
1
1
5
10
8
1
1
2
4
4
1
2
7
1
4
4
12
25
8
5
1
1
19
23
12
1
5
2
1
5
1
unn«nr: uu
MEAN
PROP IN
OF PEL
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.05
0.05
0. 19
0.00
0.23
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.47
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.09
0.04
0.00
O.OM
0.01
0. 17
0.09
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.04
0. 16
0.05
0.46
0.00
7.32
0.00
0.00
0.13
1.90
Ob 1 ANULa U
MAX
PROP1N
OF PEL
0.00
0.07
0.04
0.00
0.90
0.00
0.06
0.05
0.43
0.00
0.23
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.09
0.47
0.00
0.04
0. 13
0.01
0.00
0. 14
0. 13
0.00
0.08
0.02
0.71
0.71
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.68
0.34
4.70
0.00
21.80
0.00
0.00
0.30
1.90
atu in an,-.!
NUM INSP
H SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
--J
Ul
SU8ST
40
320
430
460
491
685
686
690
710
720
730
731
1037
1073
1080
1280
1377
1385
1430
1520
1590
1591
1610
1620
1720
1842
1980
2037
2240
2270
2430
2440
2460
2470
2490
2584
2587
2590
2610
2611
5010
9010
9020
9130
NUM OF
INSPS
109
1
3
2
1
1
4
2
3
1
1
1
6
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
14
2
6
1
2
3
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
7
1
2
1
2
10
6
1
2
1
1
3
EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES USED IN SIC=3M99
NUM OF MEAN MAX NUM INSP NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
190
4
4
3
1
1
4
2
4
3
1
1
11
1
2
3
2
1
1
2
31
a
10
2
2
4
3
1
3
1
2
1
1
14
1
2
2
5
17
1 1
2
3
1
1
11
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.29
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.01
0. 13
0. 10
0.03
0.36
0.09
0.00
0.02
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
2.52
1 .39
0.01
0.01
0.39
0.05
0.21
0.43
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.04
0.00
0. 13
0.00
O.O/
0.20
0.45
0. 19
0.21
0.53
0.00
0.45
PROPTN
OF PEL
5.02
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.04
.0. 10
0.04
0.23
0. 10
0.03
1.30
0.09
0.00
0.03
0. 18
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.77
5.02
4.40
0.01
0.02
0.97
0. 10
0.21
1.01
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.00
0. 16
0.00
0. 18
0.00
0.21
1.64
1.46
0.21
0.55
0.53
0.00
0.98
W SOME
SMP>PEL
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
HUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CN1Y EMPLOYMENT
US OStIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
260
320
1491
685
686
710
720
731
907
1520
1522
1591
1610
1791
18142
22'IO
2'l60
2571
2590
2620
9020
9135
SUBST
1430
1491
685
686
690
720
731
907
1520
1590
1591
1620
1730
2037
2310
25/0
2610
5010
NUM OF
INSPS
29
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
25
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LAfUbUHL
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
82
2
3
14
8
14
1
8
3
*4
14
2
7
2
1
3
1
l|
14
3
1
1
12
ry pACIIDr
LAruounc
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
55
5
1
14
2
1
5
3
1
6
1
>4
1
1
1
1
14
2
2
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0. 10
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.314
0.05
0.32
0.00
0.014
O.O'I
0.22
0.01
0.00
0.145
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0. 16
CIIMMARV •
ounrtMn i .
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.85
0.714
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.142
0.00
0. 13
3.00
2.3M
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.25
auobi ANiyta
MAX
PROP1N
OF PEL
0.87
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.07
0.06
0.314
0.21
0.62
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.1414
0.01
0.00
0.6U
0.00
0.87
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.35
<*IIRPEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•) 1 1
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
14
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
INDUSTRIES Wllll MICH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
-J
EXPOSURE
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
9010 1 5
9020 1 5
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
31 77
310 1 1
U9I 14 9
690 1 1
720 M 16
730
790
1366
1380
114MO
1520
1591
16?0
18'42
19M2
2037
2085
22t40 !
2310
2570
2587
2590
5010 I
9010
9130
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
' H
1
2
1
2
20
1
1
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
60 119
230 1 1
360 1 1
1430 2 3
685 14 6
700 2 3
7?0 1 1
SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
MEAN MAX
PROP IN PROPTN
OF PEL OF PEL
10.76 30.80
0.02 0.05
QIIMMARV • CIIQCT AUr*C*C
ounnART . OUDO i Ant_*c.o
MEAN MAX
PROPTN PROPTN
OF PEL OF PEL
0.1(8 6.80
O.UO 0.140
0.19 0.1414
0.00 0.00
0.90 5.50
0.02 0.03
0.00 0.00
0.114 0.25
0.06 0.07
0 . 00 0 . 00
0.72 0.72
0.12 0.12
0.28 0.28
0.01 0.03
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.12 0.30
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
6 . 80 6 . 80
0.00 0.01
0.3U 1.00
1.50 1.50
0.32 0.32
CIIMMAR V • QlltlQT AUrTC
ounriAR T . oUDo I Ani> t_ a
MEAN MAX
PROPTN PROPTN
OF PEL OF PEL
0.21 3.32
0. 1 / 0.17
0.32 0.32
0.15 0.28
0.01 0.02
0.39 0.85
0.00 0.00
USED IN SIC-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
35M1
NUM OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
1
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
14
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
II c c~ n i u c i r* —
uocu in o 1 1_>—
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
5
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
730
731
1040
1050
1280
1460
1520
1590
1591
1610
1660
1730
1840
2390
2460
2584
2590
2610
5010
9010
9020
9130
9135
1
00
SUBST
160
227
230
430
490
491
685
686
690
700
726
730
731
790
874
1385
1520
1530
NUM OF
INSPS
2
5
1
1
2
1
8
2
5
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
2
2
2
NUM OF
INSPS
125
3
7
3
2
3
1
5
6
1
1
1
10
1
tAfUSUHL
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
2
a
2
16
4
1
18
4
6
5
1
1
1
1
5
2
2
3
1
11
5
2
3
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
387
1
1
1
1
3
3
23
3
2
7
1
15
19
1
2
2
44
1
aunn«nr: ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.61
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0. 19
0.00
0.69
0.01
0. 18
0.06
0.00
0.21
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.52
0.01
0.03
0.21
CIIMMARV • Qll
oupinMn i * ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.22
0.30
0.00
0.00
3.01
0.00
0.15
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.22
0.01
0.03
0.17
0.00
0.43
O.OO
0. 15
0.00
DOIMNULO U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.23
0.89
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.79
0.00
3.06
0.02
0. 18
0.06
0.00
0.21
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.32
0.06
0.06
0.38
DCTAUprC II
D3|Mrilf[.O U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
8.40
0.30
0.00
0.00
3.01
0.00
0.46
0.78
0.03
0.00
0.88
0.01
0.25
0.79
0.00
0.86
0.00
1.70
0.00
3LU in a it,-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
crn 1 U «1 1 P-
OC.LJ in o 1 1>~
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
11
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
jjpy
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
25
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
-------
INDUS1RIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
EXPOSURE SUMMARY:
SUBST NUH OF NUH OF HEAN
INSPS TEST
SAHPS
1590 2 3
1591 13 18
1610
1620
1670
1730
1791
1810
1812
1912
2037
2038
2010
2217
2210
2260
2130
2131
2110
2160
2510
2570
. 2590
•** 2610
' 5010
2
31
1
1
3
12
20
1
5
1
3
t
1
1
d
i
2
9
1
1
9
U
5
2 9010 1 57
9130 1 8
9135 2 12
SUBST NUH OF NUH OF
INSPS TEST
SAHPS
51 131
10 1 5
130 1 3
685 5 12
686 3 5
690 3 12
730 2 9
731 1 5
1290 2 8
1110 1 1
1520 5 17
1590 1 3
1591 1 11
1620 3 6
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.66
0.00
0 . 01
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.02
0.09
0. 18
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0. 13
1.90
0.10
0.29
unnAnT .
HEAN
PROPIN
OF PEL
2.56
0.11
0. 17
0. 16
1.00
0.05
0. 19
0.52
0.61
0.00
0. 15
0.23
30. 36
0.06
SUBSTANCES
HAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
8.10
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.11
0.55
0. 18
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.05
0. 16
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.31
5.63
1.36
1.73
Clinc T AUfTC
oUtSo 1 AWLiLo
HAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
63.80
0.96
0.11
0.67
2.37
0.29
1.96
1.11
1. 16
0.00
0.90
0.50
63.80
0. 15
USED IN SIC=3561
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOME
SHP>PEL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
Hern i u c i r* n
UoLU IN blL>-J
NUH INSP
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
9
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
iŁn _
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
1
2
NUH OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
15
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
9
0
-------
HFALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
00
o
SUBST
1710
18MO
18'l2
20l|0
2MUO
2'|60
21470
2610
2651
9020
9130
SUBST
146
260
<430
»435
1)91
666
830
1037
1073
1110
1290
1520
1538
1590
1591
22»40
2310
21431
2«470
2490
9130
NUM OF
INSPS
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
U
NUM OF
INSPS
27
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
tAruaunt. a
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
1
2
3
14
1
3
9
rwpn^imr PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
I
CO
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS '1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
HO
320
360
U30
H91
685
686
690
720
730
731
1080
1280
1'I30
1M60
1520
1590
1591
1610
1620
1720
1735
18>tO
1B'I2
1860
2020
2037
22'lQ
2329
21(30
2ll60
2M90
2505
2590
2610
5010
9010
9020
9130
9135
NUN OF
INSPS
116
1
1
1
1
^
3
5
6
2
3
9
1
3
2
2
12
1
5
1
5
1
1
5
2
1
1
3
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
5
2
3
5
5
1
NUN OF MEAN MAX NUH 1 NSP NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
275
5
5
3
5
10
7
7
11
2
7
19
1
8
3
7
26
7
28
1
13
14
2
8
7
2
5
9
9
2
1
9
(4
1
2
6
t|
8
9
7
1
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.27
0.03
0.01
0.00
0. 10
0.05
0.03
0.33
0.0(4
0.01
0.05
0.17
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.30
0.07
0.89
0.02
0.014
0.00
0.86
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
M. 72
0.02
0. 31
0.20
PROPTN
OF PEL
12.70
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.2*4
1.20
0.30
0.03
0. 18
0.6(4
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.00
1.30
0.38
M.02
0.02
0. 16
0.00
1.32
0.06
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.39
0.00
0.00
1.07
0.53
0.00
0.00
0.0>4
0.00
12.70
0. 1U
2.50
0.20
W SOME
SMP>PEL
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
8
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
CD
SUBST
523
686
18(40
2580
SUBST
(46
230
260
320
360
1430
14110
U60
1491
685
686
730
731
1013
1037
10140
1080
1290
1385
1520
1590
1591
1720
1730
17714
1980
2085
2216
2227
22(40
2260
2280
2310
2M30
2(460
2M70
NUM OF
INSPS
5
1
1
1
2
NUM OF
INSPS
89
1
1
2
1
1
t|
1
1
2
2
14
2
3
8
12
2
3
2
1
(4
5
3
tAruiurtt a
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
7
1
1
2
3
FXPPI^IIRF <«
(.ArUOUFtC. 3
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
2(43
3
2
5
3
1
6
2
2
15
3
6
9
5
1
1
1
1
2
(4
(4
28
58
2
7
1
1
1
2
2
9
1
(4
1
17
11
5
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.2]
0. 10
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.65
0.01
1.09
0.14(4
1.145
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0. 12
0.00
0.73
0.142
0.02
0.29
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.21
0.03
0.30
0.07
0.00
0.0(4
0. 10
UblANULS U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
QCTAUprC II
DolAniftO U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
23.014
0.16
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.2(4
0.05
0.05
14.90
O.OU
6.30
1.15
2. 10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.33
0.00
23.0(4
0.75
0.09
0.29
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.90
0.03
0.71
O.07
0.01
0. 1 1
0.57
btu in aii>=3i
NUM INSP
H SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
cm i M Q i c— \t
3C.U Irl O 1 v»— 31
NUM INSP
W SOME
SHP>PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•*•>Ł.
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
i»A9 ________
NUH OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(4
0
2
2
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCIARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
CD
U)
EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF MEAN MAX
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
2510 1 1
2580 1 2
2590 5 10
2610 1 1
9130 1 2
9135 1 1
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
130 318
10 2 3
230 1 2
260 1 17
360 2 25
100 1 1
135 2 1
110 3 8
160 1 1
177 1 1
190 2 6
191
685
690
730
731
790
871
887
922
1033
1037
1010
1075
1080
1285
1290
1300
1385
1120
1130
1110
1160
1170
15?0
1
8
2
7
1
1
2
2
2
1
6
1
5
1
3
2
5
3
1
3
1
1
1
1 1
1560 7 19
PROPTN
OF
0
0
0
0
0
0
HUM A
PEL
.00
.00
.03
.01
.05
.00
MEAN
PROPTN
OF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PEL
.08
.00
.00
.03
.39
.00
.01
.01
.00
.00
.05
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
.01
.01
.01
.05
.00
.03
.00
.01
.00
.02
.00
. 31
. 11
PROPTN
OF
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
OCT Ah
Do I An
MAX
PEL
00
00
05
01
06
00
f*f C
USED IN SIC=3662
NUH INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
NUH INSP NUM OF
PROPTN
OF
16.
0.
0.
0.
16.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
1 .
PEL
50
00
00
20
50
00
01
06
00
00
20
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
06
00
05
01
02
06
00
05
00
02
00
05
00
00
12
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM
PEL
OF
SAMPS
OVR
11
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
PEL
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES Ml 111 HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
I
00
SUBST
1590.
1591
1620
1660
1720
1730
1840
1812
1860
1920
2020
2080
2085
2180
2240
2260
2310
2430
2460
2485
2490
2570
2590
2610
9010
9020
9090
9130
9135
SUBST
20
40
160
170
190
230
260
320
430
435
440
460
NUM OF
INSPS
5
13
1
2
6
1
2
2
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
2
4
1
2
2
1
4
3
2
1
1
2
1
NUM OF
INSPS
253
1
1
1
4
1
2
2
3
10
6
3
1
tAKUbUKt b
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
14
37
2
2
13
1
3
2
1
4
a
4
2
5
1
2
a
6
4
4
2
2
a
13
3
1
2
2
1
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
581
1
1
1
6
2
5
7
4
19
14
3
2
lUMMAHY: bU
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.09
0. 10
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.02
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.06
o.oa
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.01
UPIFlAn T * 3U
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.09
0.27
0.00
0.04
0. 1 1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
O.O2
0.03
0.00
HblAMUtb U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0. 16
5.00
0.00
0.09
0.31
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
1.34
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
o.oa
0.00
0.03
0.16
0. 14
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.09
0.01
OCTAIJppC II
DDIMnlsC-O U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
6.91
0.27
0.00
0.04
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.20
0.05
0.00
btu IN blU-J
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
crn tu LLJ in o 1 l_»— J
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b/M
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A7O ________
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
I
00
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF MEAN MAX NUM INSP NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
'190 1 3
(491 (4 13
570 1 1
6M5 2 6
682 2 2
685 3 5
686
690
710
720
730
731
790
830
930
950
990
1010
10H4
1030
1033
1037
lO'lO
1073
1220
1
1
2
5
19
3
3
5
3
1
1
5
3
1
3
3
2
1
3
1280 <4 14
1290 5 11
1300 1 2
1385 2 «4
UI30 2 3
UltO 2 2
Hl60 2
1>470 1
1500 1
1515 2
1520 2 5
153*4 2
1538 1
1560 M 7
1590 20 59
1591 21 65
1620 2 12
1631 2 7
16143 1 3
1720 6 18
1730 6 10
1732 1 2
1791 1 1
1BUO 5 12
18M2 2 7
PROPTN
OF
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
PEL
00
03
00
00
02
00
00
00
21
06
39
07
01
38
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
01
07
00
01
10
0*4
02
6<4
00
00
10
50
00
01
00
00
33
07
02
36
56
00
12
16
00
00
00
O'l
PROPTN
OF
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 .
2.
0.
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
PEL
00
18
00
00
05
01
00
00
23
20
014
12
01
88
03
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
02
07
00
02
23
06
014
29
00
00
10
50
00
01
00
00
25
06
61
65
60
00
29
51
00
00
014
25
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
1860
2020
2037
2180
2240
2260
2280
2310
2390
2430
2432
2460
2470
2485
2490
2570
2590
2602
2610
2650
5010
9010
9020
> 9130
i 9135
SUBST
40
230
260
310
320
430
435
440
460
480
491
527
560
59O
612
685
NUM OF
INSPS
1
1
4
1
3
1
1
4
2
10
1
14
1
5
1
1
11
1
4
1
1
1
2
6
1
NUH OF
INSPS
149
2
1
3
1
2
4
1
4
4
2
tXKUbUItt
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
2
2
7
1
a
1
2
8
5
21
5
26
2
9
4
3
21
1
17
3
2
1
4
21
2
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
410
4
4
9
1
16
1
2
6
bUMMANY: bU
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.25
1.08
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.27
0.04
0.44
0.05
^IIMMARV • Qll
OUFIFIMIAT • OU
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
O.05
UbIANOtb U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.06
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
1.72
0.02
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.83
1.57
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.20
0.27
0.23
6.91
0.06
t)OIAnl»td U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
19.61
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.02
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.22
btU IN bll,-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
ittlt
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
I
CD
-J
SUBST
686
690
720
730
731
810
817
860
1033
1037
1010
1060
1073
1280
1300
1380
1385
1520
1522
1536
1560
1590
1591
1595
1620
1650
1790
1810
1812
1980
2033
2037
2012
2210
2270
2280
2160
2170
2190
2587
2590
2610
261 1
2612
9020
9030
9130
9135
NUM OF
INSPS
5
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
1
1
3
6
1
2
1
6
15
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
a
3
i
i
6
3
1
2
1
1
6
3
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
NUM OF MEAN
TEST PROPTN
SAMPS OF PEL
6
2
1
16
15
1
2
3
1
7
5
1
5
3
3
1
7
35
2
3
1
23
M 6
2
16
i*
6
5
6
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
31
14
1
1
16
16
5
I
3
1
a
3
0.86
0.06
0.00
0.13
0.23
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.31
0.02
3.23
0.01
0.00
0.17
0. 10
0.00
0.00
1.08
0.00
0.01
0. 10
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.36
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.50
0.08
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.27
0.03
0.07
0.01
0.01
O.OO
0. 39
0. 10
0. 17
STANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
(4.26
0.09
0.00
0.9«4
0.61
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.014
0.00
1.75
0.07
1.80
0.01
0.00
0.70
0. 10
0.00
0.00
9. 18
19.61
0.00
0.20
0.26
0.01
0.11
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.50
0.15
0.11
0.58
0.00
0.03
0.27
0. 13
0.12
0. 10
0.01
0.00
0.39
0. 19
0.29
USED IN SIC=
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 3711
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
MLALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH MICK SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
CD
00
SUBST
360
1490
1073
1377
1720
1730
2U70
9010
SUBST
320
360
1430
1435
1460
1491
686
690
731
1520
1536
1560
1590
1591
1620
1720
1790
1791
18140
2037
2'460
2M 70
2"490
2590
2610
9010
9015
9020
9130
9135
9210
NUM OF
INSPS
8
NUH OF
INSPS
53
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
14
1
2
i
3
2
2
1
2
14
2
1
tXKUbUKt
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
29
18
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
103
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
14
2
5
1
2
15
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
5
2
2
3
2
8
7
3
12
1)
2
OUMPIANY: ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0. 13
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 19
0.17
0.00
0.00
miMMAR V * <\li
ounriMn i • ou
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 11
0.05
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.0'4
0.05
0.01
0.00
0. 72
0.61
1. 114
0.51
u:>l ANL.tb u
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
14.63
14.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.29
0.00
0.00
ocTAurri u
DOIAf1l>C.O U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
2.03
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.05
0.05
1. 16
0.00
0.014
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.09
0.00
0.08
0. 10
0.02
0.00
1.53
1.39
2.03
0.66
StU IN blU=J
NUM INSP
H SOME
SMP>PEL
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<^rn IN PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
rt>»
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
0
-------
I
00
IO
SUBST
no
230
<430
«435
«491
560
685
686
690
731
830
931
1037
10140
1060
1170
1371
1380
1520
1534
7
2
0. 18
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.145
0.09
0.00
0.02
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 10
0. 10
0.00
0.«47
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
O.U2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 13
0.07
0.00
0.61
0.141
0.00
O.OU
0. 13
O.OU
0. 33
0.81
1TANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.09
0.00
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.«47
0.13
0.00
0.05
0.6M
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.17
0.00
3.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.13
0.00
1.59
2.89
0.00
0.08
0. 15
0.16
0.70
1.23
USED IN SIC=
NUH INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
=3999
HUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES Wllll HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
SUBST
(430
1|'40
700
10140
1385
1710
1720
1730
2020
2280
2460
21490
SUBST
686
1591
SUBST
260
320
1491
630
631
685
690
730
731
680
1325
1520
1590
1591
16?0
IB'lO
18M2
NUM OF
INSPS
13
2
NUM OF
INSPS
2
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
58
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
5
1
1
6
11
9
1
2
1
txrubuiit
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
2»4
2
1
2
1
1
9
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
2
1
1
HUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
19>4
25
1
3
2
2
2
<4
1
9
1
1
13
70
3M
2
l|
1
iUMMAHY I
MEAN
PROPIN
OF PEL
0. 16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.97
CIIUMARV •
OUnriAn T *
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0.00
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.2«4
0.03
0.00
0. 19
0.00
0.00
0.5M
0.00
0.61
1.06
0.00
0.00
0.56
2.91
2.72
O.OO
O.l<3
2.35
bUBSI ANUtS
MAX
PROPfN
OF PEL
3 . 90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.014
0.07
O.O'l
0.00
0.00
3.90
CllflCT AUPf*C
3UDO 1 MrH-»C.o
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
26.23
0.20
0.00
0.5*4
0.00
0.00
1.08
0.00
0.61
2.80
0.00
0.00
2. 11
26.23
15.22
0.00
0.91
2.35
UStU in aiL.= Dl
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 1
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME INSP W
SMP>PEL
0
0
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
H SOME INSP W
SMP>PEL
21
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
10
6
0
0
1
MEAN>PEL
19
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
8
6
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVH PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
67
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
37
214
0
0
1
-------
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY CMPLOYHENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
2310
2582
2590
2610
9020
9135
SUBST
.
1)0
320
>430
(460
560
685
686
687
690
700
720
1380
1590
1591
1720
19UO
2037
20»iO
2270
21)60
2PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
iicm in c i f* tii
UoLU IN 5>lt»-5.
NUH INSP
W SOME
SHP>PEL
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
INSP W
1
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUH OF
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
10
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLAHA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
SUBST
1310
2037
2360
SUBST
9010
9020
>
K>
SUBST
190
320
1430
570
1590
2020
2037
2270
2*490
SUBST
731
667
1591
1631
17?0
1730
22MO
NUM or
INSPS
NUM OF
INSPS
2
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
27
18
1
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
13
^PUbUHt
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
<4
2
1
1
f pr\Qi IQP
IrUOUKt
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
3
1
2
f PHQIIRT
krUoUnu
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
66
3
1
1
3
1
2
50
2
2
1
rpftClia r
LrUoUnC.
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
38
3
14
2
5
3
5
3
aurwiAKt :
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.03
0.00
0.00
0. 10
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0.00
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.*47
1.09
0.07
0.20
0.00
QHMMAft V •
aunnnn • •
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.21
0.0<4
0.00
0.25
1 .90
O.OO
O.ll'l
0.00
SUUai ANL,t3
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0. 10
0.00
0.00
0. 10
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0.00
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
9.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
9.98
0. 15
0.21
0.00
ClIQC T AUPT Q
dUD3 1 Mrl^jt J
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
3. 70
0.05
0.00
O.'tO
3.70
O.01
0.76
O.OO
USLU in oii»-
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
DDHI
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME INSP W
SMP>PEL
0
0
HEAN>PEL
0
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME INSP W
SMP>PEL
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
MEAN>PEL
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
"7 3I|O ___ __
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
»,
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
-------
I
VO
U)
SU8ST
2260
2M60
2570
2610
9020
SUBST
270
1011
1M30
I860
9010
SUBST
1190
1660
1730
9020
SUBST
NUM OF
INSPS
1
1
1
1
2
NUM OF
INSPS
5
1
1
1
1
1
NUM OF
INSPS
5
1
1
1
2
NUM OF
INSPS
731
1520
1590
1920
2'l85
9010
INDUSTRIES WITH MICH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1983
NUM OF MEAN
TEST PROPTN
SAMPS OF PEL
2
6
1
1
3
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
NUH OF
TEST
SAMPS
9
1
2
2
<4
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.00
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.00
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
16
1
2
0
2
2
1
SUMMARY: 5
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.92
0. 30
O.MO
2.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
STANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
O.OU
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.00
USED IN SIC=73«49
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
O.OU
0.00
0.02
0.0«t
0.00
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
m.eo
0.30
0.58
1M.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
NUH INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962
tAruaunt.
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
19 37
20 3 9
170 1 3
1290 2 5
1385 2
1120 1
1776 2
2260 1
2290 1
2310 1
2160 3 1
2510 1 1
2590 3 1
___________ — — — _ rw pnciinc'
SUBST NUM OF NUH OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
23 33
10 1 1
260 2 1
191
690
710
1110
1380
1591
1631
1890
1903
2020
2210
2160
9010 2
9013
9015
9017
9020
2
2
1
1
1
5
2
2
2
1
9130 2 2
aunnani: au
MEAN
PROP IN
OF PEL
0.09
0.21
0.02
0.08
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.08
0.09
0.01
QIIUI4APV * PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
fyj --------
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
-------
INDUSTRIES WIIH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
EXPOSURE
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
30 61
170
220
270
130
1010
1060
1190
1300
1385
1531
1560
1590
1591
1620
1631
1720
2037
2170
2180
2215
2310
2160
2505
2590
5010
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
6
1
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
6
1
2
1
9020 2 5
9135 1 1
SUBST NUM OF NUM OF
INSPS TEST
SAMPS
51 115
10 3 7
360 1 3
130 3 3
191 1 6
590 1 5
685 2 9
687 1 2
690 1 1
730 1 2
1380 1 1
15?0 3 9
1590 1 6
1591 7 21
SUMMARY:
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.13
0.09
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.08
1.13
0.13
0. 11
0.09
0.06
0.26
0.17
0.00
0.27
0.05
0.00
0.05
0. 12
0.03
0.05
0.07
0. 11
0.00
0.17
0.00
0. 19
SUMMARY:
MEAN
PROPtN
OF PEL
0.57
0.00
7.85
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.09
0.21
0.26
1 .07
0.00
0.15
0. 30
2.5?
SUBSTANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
1.39
0. 11
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.09
1.39
0.17
0.21
0. 18
0. 12
0.26
0.91
0.00
0.31
0.05
0.00
0.06
0. 11
0.03
0.05
0.21
0.22
0.00
0. 17
0.00
0.19
SUBSTANCES
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
16.10
0.03
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.51
0.22
0.26
2.13
0.00
6.00
1 . 18
16. '10
USED IN SIC=7399
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
USED IN SIC=7
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C 4 A ____»»__
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
7
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
3
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
9
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
5
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST NUM Or
INSPS
1620
1730
2037
2170
2270
2460 5
2590 5
2612 1
9020 9
SUBST NUM or
INSPS
48
260 1
320 1
<430
491
570
620
670
731
1037
1290
1385
1520 2
1590 5
1591 7
1620
1720
1730
2037
2260
2460 2
2490 1
2590 2
2611 2
9020 1 1
tAruaurtt a
NUM or
TEST
SAMPS
2
1
1
1
1
9
9
2
14
NUH or
TEST
SAMPS
122
14
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
10
32
1
1
1
14
1
6
1
6
5
20
unriANY: au
MEAN
PROPTN
or PEL
0.02
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
MEAN
PROPTN
or PEL
0. 18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
0. 12
0.57
0. 49
0.03
0.17
0.03
0.37
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.24
0.05
tJSIANlta U
MAX
PROPfN
or PCL
0.03
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.2J
0.03
0.00
0.01
nCTAIJf*C"C ||
DolArll'C.a U
MAX
PROPTN
or PEL
3.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.21
1.58
3.60
0.03
0.17
0.03
0.57
0.00
0.11
0.00
0. 10
0.56
0.47
atu in aiu
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cm i u Q i r*
OLU in 3 1 u
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM or
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•jc in __
NUM or
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM or
SAMPS
0/R PEL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUM or
SAMPS
OVR PEL
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
Ml All It HA^AKU
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT
US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
.
360
490
630
686
690
720
730
731
1033
1080
1280
1430
1520
1522
1560
1590
1591
1620
1840
2180
2260
2270
2460
2590
2612
9010
9020
9135
SUBST
1038
2590
SUBST
1631
NUM OF
INSPS
52
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
2
5
2
3
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
5
2
NUH OF
INSPS
2
1
1
NUH OF
INSPS
2
2
EXPOSURE
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
97
1
1
4
1
4
4
4
5
2
2
2
1
11
1
2
2
10
3
5
2
2
1
4
6
2
1
10
4
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
3
2
1
NUH OF
TEST
SAHPS
2
2
SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES
HEAN MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.07
0.37
0.32
1.46
0.00
0.12
0. 19
0.00
0.51
0.57
0.02
2.13
1.22
0.02
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.03
2.59
0.37
0.40
0.00
0.31
1.61
NUMMARY • 111
ounnMn » • ovi
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.23
0.46
0.00
C 1 IMM A R V • ^11
ounn/\n T . DU
MEAN
PROPTN
or PEL
0.68
0.68
PROPTN
OF PEL
6.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.18
0.55
0.72
3. 19
0.00
0. 12
0.36
0.00
3.55
0.57
0.04
3.98
3.88
0.06
0.38
0.06
0.03
0.03
6.05
0. 70
0.70
0.00
1.50
3.67
OCT AUpCC
DO i mil* c o
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.85
0.85
0.00
nc T ANfT c
Do 1 Mr^VrfC O
MAX
PROPTN
or PEL
0.83
0.83
USED IN SIC=7699
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
ti^rn IM <* i P— HI
UOE.U in o i *_> — o*
NUM INSP
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
0
0
INSP W
HEAN>PEL
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
NUH OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
0
0
0 0
NUH INSP NUH OF
W SOHE
SHP>PEL
0
0
INSP W
MIAN>PEL
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
3
NUM OF
SAHPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
-------
HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES
INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT
US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982
SUBST
20
(40
290
330
395
(435
670
1030
1038
1060
1080
1190
1210
1280
1290
1(430
1(480
1590
1630
1860
1953
2085
> 2120
' 2M60
m 2"75
00 2590
9020
SUBST
320
UMO
570
670
87(4
1011
1060
1160
1210
1290
1515
1860
1870
NUM OF
INSPS
5(4
1
1
1
1
(4
1
2
1
3
<4
1
5
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
3
NUM OF
INSPS
2(4
1
1
1
txrubunt
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
128
3
1
1
1
1(4
1
(4
1
17
12
2
9
3
1
17
1
1
1
2
1
(4
1
3
(4
1
16
6
NUM OF
TEST
SAMPS
29
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
6
1
1
2
&UMMAKY:
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.91
0.20
0.60
0.0(4
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.39
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5. (45
0.00
0.00
0.0(4
0.00
0. 16
0.00
Q 1 IUU A ft V •
ourwiAn T ;
MEAN
PROPTN
OF PEL
0. 32
0.00
0.02
0.0(4
0.71
0. 1(4
0.(45
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.32
(4.30
0.00
0.00
bUttblANUt:> U
MAX
PROPTN
OF PEL
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.30
0.00
1.98
0.20
(4.00
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.39
5.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
1.(45
0.00
QIIQC T AUtTTC II
OUDO 1 AntsC.0 U
MAX
HROPIN
OF PEL
(4.30
0.00
0.02
0.0(4
1.(42
0. 1(4
0.(45
0.00
0.03
0.05
0.90
(4.30
0.00
0.00
btU IN SIL,= O(
NUM INSP
W SOME
SMP>PEL
8
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
JOZ
NUM OF
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
cm i u cip an~7 i _._.__.
NUM INSP NUM OF
W SOME
SMP>PEL
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
INSP W
MEAN>PEL
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
19
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
(4
0
0
0
0
1
0
NUH OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
-------
INOUSTMirs WITH HIGH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT
US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1983
I
\O
10
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
1.
j.
EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES USED IN SIC=8O71
SUBST HUH Of HUH OT MEAN MAX HUM INSP HUM Of
INSPS TEST PROPTN PROPTN W SOME INSP W
SAMPS OF PEL OF PEL SMP>PEL MEAN>PEL
1875 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
2053 1 1 0.21 0.21 0 0
2590 2 3 0.07 0.10 0 0
2630 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
9010 1 1 0.014 O.Oll 0 0
SUBST NUH Of NUN OF MEAN MAX HUM INSP HUM OF
INSPS TEST PROP1N PROPTN W SOME INSP W
SAMPS OF PEL OF PEL SMP>PEL MEAN>PEL
8 11 0.22 2.55 1 1
360 1 1 0.04 O.Oll 0 0
690 1 2 0.00 0.00 0 0
1720 1 2 0.00 0.00 0 0
I77H 2 2 0.01 0.03 0 0
9010 2 3 0.8U 2.55 1 1
9020 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
SUBST NUH OF NUH OF MEAN MAX NUH INSP NUH OF
INSPS TEST PROPTN PROPTN W SOME INSP W
SAMPS OF PEL OF PEL SMP>PEL MEAN>PEL
3 13 0.00 0.00 0 0
9020 3 13 0.00 0.00 0 0
Standard Industrial Classification: see Appendix 11 for industry names.
Industrial Hygiene Field Operation Manual (IHFOM) substance codes: see Appendix 6
Number of Inspections performed.
Number of test (exposure) samples taken.
Mean exposure expressed as a proportion of the federal OSHA PEL.
Maximum exposure expressed as a proportion of the federal OSHA PEL.
Number of Inspections with at least one sample above the federal OSHA PEL.
Number of Inspections with mean exposure above the federal OSHA PEL,
Number of exposure samples above the federal OSHA PEL.
"." indicates summary values for each SIC.
HUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
0
0
0
NUN OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
NUM OF
SAMPS
OVR PEL
0
0
for key to substance names.
-------
API'ENDI ». b
A Key to Industrial Hygiene Field Operations Manual (IHFOM) Hazardous Substance Code Numbers
NOHS
• •10
• 020
• 030
0040
• 060
• 070
0080
• OBI
0110
0115
• 120
0120
• 125
• 130
0145
• 150
0160
1160
1162
• 165
0170
• 175
> 8185
*""* U 1
o 0220
0225
0230
0230
0230
• 230
• 230
0230
0230
0230
4230
0230
0230
0230
0230
0230
0230
0230
0230
0230
02J5
0260
0260
0?60
0 "63
0260
026J
• 1038
• 1568
• 2740
• 2820
02900
03298
17480
71401
• 3530
03540
• 3800
80266
04260
04370
04530
• 4590
05608
23265
• 4975
05215
05250
• 6270
06190
06320
06580
• 7040
A1433
A1640
A1641
M1109
M2375
M2725
M3285
M3911
M3981
M4098
M4109
• 7310
07325
07328
07370
07405
80255
82890
M0294
M0617
MI4B6
0 7 5
-------
17'/B3
PAGE
IHFOM NOUS
0260
0260
0260
0260
0260
0270
0290
0290
0290
0300
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
0310
> 0310
I 0310
Ł0310
20310
0310
0310
0310
0318
0320
0330
0335
0340
0360
0360
0360
OJ60
0370
0374
0374
0374
0380
0330
0381
0382
0390
0391
O'.OO
0410
04 10
C4iO
84436
84465
84479
84586
84735
07580
80636
84737
90320
35750
M0787
M2929
M3299
08640
08650
08655
80341
81719
81720
83238
83391
83715
83717
83799
83S91
84175
84310
84519
84801
84438
09070
09830
11280
11600
A1144
11770
11855
83348
81729
M0079
12940
80517
12963
12964
12966
12980
13100
13103
1 3160
1 1410
t, JVG?
1 19«0
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
7
10
10
10
7
3
10
10
7
7
10
10
10
10
1
7
7
7
1
1
7
3
7
7
7
1
I
I
SUBSTANCE
ARSENIC PENTOXIDE
SODIUM ARSEN1TE
ARSENIC ACID
ARSANILIC ACID
Dir.ETHYLARSINIC ACID
ARSINE
ASPHALT WOLATILES
BITUI1EN
ASPHALT
AZINPIIOS. METHYL
BARIUM METABORATE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
BARIUM FLUORIDE
BARIUM CARBONATE
BARIUM CHLORIDE
BARIUM HYDROXIDE
BARIUM OXIDE
BARIUM DIPHENYLAMINE SULFONATE
BARIUM NITRATE
BARIUM PEROXIDE
BARIUM HYDROXIDE. OCTAHYDRATE
BARIUM ALUMINATE
BARIUM ALUMINATE
BARIUM PHOSPHATE
BARIUM BORATE
BARIUM CHLORATE
BARIUM SUIFIDE
BARIUM ACE1ATE
BARIUM PERCHLORATE
BAYGON (PROPOXUR)
BENZENE
BCNZIDINE
BENZOYL PEROXIDE
BENZYL CHLORIDE
BERYLLIUM CHLORIDE
BERYLLIUM
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
SODIUM BERYLLIUM BENZENESULFONATE
BISrUTH TELLURIDE
SODIUM BORATES
BORAX
SODIUM BORATE
BORON OXIDE
BORON OXIDES
BOROH TRIBPOMIDE
BOrON TR I FLUORIDE
BR'lillME PENUFLUORIDC
BROtlOHOPM
mil AOILMC . 1.3-
nr FIIYL ACI ioMr
fHHYL IIIIYL
-------
PACE
IHFOn
NOHS
5U8SIAMCC
HAZARD UCIGHT
0435
0435
0440
0441
0460
0461
0462
0470
0477
0478
0480
0485
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
p 0490
1 0490
|± 0490
S 0*9.0
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0500
0505
0505
0505
0505
0510
0515
0520
0522
Or>24
0524
OS>?5
0',?7
OV'7
U52R
M17S7
29930
143*0
14382
13450
14410
14400
14440
14720
M112B
11785
14910
A1077
A1661
M1507
M1508
M1554
M2267
M2269
M2270
M2900
M4151
15570
15410
80247
81747
81748
81749
81750
82781
83005
83628
81718
84157
84457
84478
15700
A1571
15705
17855
80165
15710
15741
15755
15800
MI989
81M2
478PO
Alt??
R0?
-------
17/83
PAGE
IHFOM HOHS
0529
0529
0530
0540
0560
0570
0571
0575
0577
0590
0611
0612
0614
0615
0617
0620
0623
0627
0628
062ft
0630
0630
0630
> 0640
^0645
00660
u>0670
0675
0680
0683
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0616
0636
06fib
OfeRfc
73860
84027
17367
17370
17460
17490
M1763
17683
17695
46240
51591
73500
18045
18050
18065
18190
18240
18250
M0418
80048
M0335
80241
90510
18040
29010
18590
18500
M0419
18260
M4039
A1227
M0063
M0073
M0074
M0789
M0814
M0886
M0900
M092t
M1488
M1499
M1686
M2265
M2498
M2697
060&I
19360
19395
19410
60170
68900
80064
5UBSTAHCE
HAZARD WEIGHT
7
7
1
10
7
10
10
1
7
7
10
7
7
1
7
3
1
3
1
1
10
10
10
7
10
1
10
7
10
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
SUBSTANCE
CAPTAN
TRICHLOROMETHYLTHIO-4-CYCLOHEXENE-1.2-
CARDON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON MONOXIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CATECHOL
CELLULOSE
PORTLAND CEMENT
METHOXYETHANOL.2
CHLORDANE
TOXAPHENE
CHLORINE DIOXIDE
CHLORINE TRIFLUORIDE
CHLOROACETALDEHYDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROBENZYLIDENE MALONITRILE
CHLOROBROMOflETHAHE
CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
MONOCHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLORINATED DIPIIENYL ETHER
POLYCHLORINATED DIPHENYL
CHLORODIPHEHYLS
CHLORINE
EPICHLORHYDRIN
CHLORO-1-NITROPROPANE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOPOPICRIN
CHLOROPRENE
CHLOROTOLUENE
ORGANIC CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS
INORGANIC CHROI1ATES
SODIUM DICHROMATE (VI)
INORGANIC DICHROMATES
MAGNESIUM DICHROMATE
LEAD CHROMATE LEAD MOLYBDATE,LEAD SULF
LEAD CHROMATE MOLYBOATED
ZINC TETROXY CHROMATE
C.I. 77600-PIGttENT YELLOW 34
CHROME ORANGE
CHROME GREEN
LEAD CHROMATE.LEAD SULFATE - FERRIC AM
BARIUM CHROMATE
CALCIUM DICHROMATE
LEAD CHROMATE LEAD SULFATE COMPLEX
AMI1UNIUM DICHROMATE (VI)
CHROMIC ACID
CHROMIUM
CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE
POTASSIUM CHROMATE
SODIUM CHROMAIE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE
-------
PAGE
IHFOn
HOHS
0686
0666
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0686
0690
0690
0690
0690
0690
0690
0690
0690
0690
0695
0700
0710
0720
0720
0720
> 0720
1 0720
>- 0720
S 0720
0720
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0730
0735
0760
0760
0760
0760
0765
0780
0732
'J790
0790
0790
07 )0
0790
8170)
81 774
81876
83496
84660
90560
90570
90580
A1040
A 1041
19380
82232
82893
83431
83500
84289
84456
19767
90620
M0628
M1023
M2576
19770
80347
81777
82231
84329
84330
M1149
M2276
M32BO
20115
20155
20170
20200
80237
82803
83641
84334
94040
20380
84266
84364
84497
T0624
?onso
209\0
AI047
AI491
M00b2
IT'flfi ")
60400
SUBSTANCE
MAZAKD WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
10
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
10
10
10
10
7
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
SUBSTANCE
AMMONIUM CHROMATE
CHROME YELLOU
LEAD CHROMA IE
CALCIUM CHROI1ATE
STRONTIUM CHROMATE
CHROME PLATING COMPOUND
CHROMOUS SALTS
INORGANIC CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS
CHROMIC FLUORIDE
CHROMOUS SULFATE
CHROMIC NITRATE
CHROMIC POTSM. SULFATE
CHROMIC POTSM.SULFATE.DODECAHYDRATE
CHROMOUS CHLORIDE
CHROMOUS SULFITE
CHROMIC ACETATE
CHROMIC CHLORIDE
COAL
COAL TAR PITCH VOLATILES
NAPTHA
COBALTOUS SULFATE
COBALT OXIDE
COBALT
COBALT NAPHTHENATE
COBALTOUS ACETATE
COBALT NAPHTHENATE
COBALTOUS CHLORIDE
COBALTOUS NITRATE
CUPRIC CHLORIDE
C. I. 77400-PIGMENT METAL 2
COPPER POUDGR
COPPCR
COPPER CYANIDE
COPPER OXIDES
COPPER SULFATE
COPPER NAPHTHENATE
CUPROUS CYANIDE
COPPER HYDROXIDE
COPPER CHLORIDE
COTTOH DUST
CRESOL
CRESOL PARA
CRESOL OHIHO
CRESOL IIETA
CRISTOBALUE
CliriEIIE
CYAHAMIDE
SODIUM COPPER CYANIDE
CYANIDE SOL
INORGANIC CYAMIDCS
CAlCIUM CYANIDE
POTAOSIUM CYANIDE
-------
'/17/83
PAGE
IHFOM NOHS
0790
0790
0790
0790
0790
0790
0800
0810
0820
0830
0840
0842
0845
0646
0847
OC50
0850
0857
OF.60
0860
0361
0862
> 0863
1 0864
j± 0367
g 0868
0869
0870
0871
0872
0874
0080
0880
0887
0900
0902
0903
0905
0910
0920
0921
0921
0922
0923
0924
0925
092*.
0927
O1)?!!
0929
0979
00 JO
68950
80720
81838
81950
82888
83663
20970
21190
21560
21660
21705
84526
20065
24270
73750
M0377
M3026
M0376
M4016
23010
23370
23650
23865
23880
24003
24006
24025
03350
24095
24100
24130
24150
84164
24235
24425
M2501
83439
K2830
24680
24930
M0687
25210
25515
12846
25820
25650
27615
2609b
261 to
7 it 17")
H J77«i
;• o •> f> o
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD WEIGHT
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
1
3
3
1
3
1
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
10
7
1
3
10
10
10
1
1
1
10
7
7
1
1
7
3
10
1
1
7
7
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
1 0
i n
i
SUBSTANCE
SODIUM CYANIDE
ZINC CYANIDE
GOLD CYANIDE
GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE
AMMONIUM CYANIDE
COBALT CYANIDE
CYANOGEN
CYCLOHEXANE
CYCLOHEX/.NOL
CYCLOHEXANONE
CYCLOHEXENE
CYCLONEXYLAMINE-SKIN
CYCLOPENTADIENE
D1CNLOP.OPHEHOXYACETIC ACID
DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE
DIMETHYL 0-( 2 . 2-DICHLOROVINYL )PNOSPHAT
DIMETHYL DICHLOROVINYL PHOSPHATE
DEMETON
HYDROXY-4-METHYL-2-ENTANONE. 4-P
DIACETONE ALCOHOL
DIAZOMETHANE
DIBORAHE
DIBUTYL PHOSPHATE
DIBUTYL PHTHALA1E
DICHL090DENZEHE. ORTHO-
DICHLOROBENZENE, PARA-
DICHLGROBENZIDFNE,3,3
DICHLOROETHYLENE
DICHLORODIFIUOROMETHANE
DICHLORA-5.5-DIMETHYIHYDANTOIN
DICHLOROETHANE (ETHYLCNE DICIILORIDE)
DICHLOROETHYL ETHER
BISC2-CHLOROETHYL ) ETHER
DICHLOROFLUOR0.1E THANE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
DICROTOPHOS (BIDRIN)-SKIN
DICYCLOPENTADIENE
DIEIDRIN
DIETHYLAMINE
DIE1HYLAMINOETHANOL
DIAMINOUIETHYLAMINE.
DIETNYLENE TRIAKIIIE
DiriUOROniBROMOMETHANE
DIGLYCIDYL ETHER
D 1 METHYL -4 -HEP TANONF. 2.6
01 ISOPROPYLAMINE-SKIM
DIPHtMYL AI11IIE
DIMETHYL ACETAMIDC
PIMEIHYl AMINE
DIME niYLAMir'u A70Brn^pNF
ninr rim AiniuiA/oni ti/i tir
DII1I IIIYI I (i:
-------
PAGE
IHFOH
NOUS
(
(
1
1
(
1
1
1
>
t->
a\
0930
1931
1932
1932
1933
1935
1940
)950
I960
1970
1970
1971
1970
1990
1010
1011
1013
1014
1016
1018
1030
1)33
1037
1037
1037
1040
1050
1060
1060
1070
1073
1075
1080
1090
100
110
130
140
155
160
161
170
175
190
190
210
220
22*
2JO
L't3
l?67
u;o
26560
26335
A1591
26420
81806
M2705
•84395
59210
26880
27046
27048
27050
83370
27125
25145
27590
M1527
84537
83646
MO 34 7
04980
31350
04580
46930
84580
31470
31490
H0238
31500
31520
27780
83448
31830
31900
36330
31970
32220
23660
32610
24120
MJB89
46935
M0492
A1719
32550
32590
32760
32840
3^940
M0362
11J35
J1J70
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD WEIGHT
3
1
3
3
3
10
10
3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
10
3
1
1
3
3
10
10
10
I
7
1
1
7
1
7
SUBSTANCE
DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE
DII1ETHYLANILINE
DIBROMO-2.2-DICHLOROETHYL DIMETHYL PHO
DIMETHYL-1.2-DIBROI10-2.2-DICHLOROETHYL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPAHE.1.2
DIMETHYLHYDRAZIIIE-SKIN
DIMETHUPHTHALATE
DIMETHYL SULFATE-SKIH
DINITROBENZENE. META-
DINITR08ENZEHE, ORTHO
DINITROBEHZENE, PARA
DIHITROBENZEHE (ALL ISOMERS)
DIHITROIOIUEHE
1.4-DIOXANE
DIPHENYL
CORUHDUtl
DIPROPYLENE CLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER
METHYL OLEATE
ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE,BIS<2-
ETHANOLAMINE
ETHOXYETHAHOL.2
THOXYETHOXY)ETHANOL ACETATE, 2-<2-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOHOETHYL ETHER ACETAT
ETHOXYETHYL ACETATE
ETHYL ACETATE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
ALCOHOL
ETHAHOL
ETHYLAMINE
METHYLENE BISPHEHYL ISOCYAHATE
ETHYL 5EC-AI1YL KETOHE
ETHYL BENZENE
BROMOETIIANE
ETHYL BUTYL KETONE
ETHYL CHLORIDE
ETHYLEHEDIAMINE
1.2DIBROMOETHANE
E1HYL FORMATE
1,1 DICHLOROETHANE
ETHYLIDENE NORBORENE
ETHYLEHE GLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER ACETA
AZIRIDIHE
ETHYLENE OXIDE CONDENSATE
ETHYLEHE OXIDE
ETHYL ETHER
EIHYL MERCAPTAN
CTHYIMORPHOLINE
ETHYL SILICATE
HRRIC DIMITHYLDITHIOCARBAMATE
FtRROVAIIADIUM DUST
FlUORIMC
-------
PAGE
IHFOM NOHS
1280
1280
1280
1280
1280
1280
1210
1280
1230
1280
1280
12CO
1280
1280
1280
1285
1290
1290
1292
1300
1310
1325
> 1330
I 1340
Ł 1340
2 1540
1340
1365
1367
1368
1369
1371
1372
1374
1370
1380
1385
1387
1339
1389
1390
1390
1390
1415
1420
1430
1440
I'.fcO
I'i70
1480
1490
1 r>00
M0187
M0579
M0699
MI010
12985
33595
60410
80297
81734
81932
81945
84180
84314
A4425
84445
33565
M1529
33640
84454
33245
33720
34120
34370
M0541
90880
90833
90885
35120
90950
35755
35960
36060
17385
T0175
83899
36955
37510
37520
37630
82206
M0499
33110
84394
M'^385
38575
3B580
3B530
38550
JBC.05
laozo
1 1, f> '• •>
i-)(\?0
SUBSTANCE
HAZAKD WLK.HT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
10
10
3
7
7
1
1
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
10
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
3
7
7
7
10
1
7
1 0
SUBSTANCE
HEXAFIUORIDES
CALCIUM FlUORIDE
ALUtllHUn FLUORIDE
LITHIUM FLUORIDE
BORON TRIFLUCRIUE COMPLEXES
FLUORSPAR
POTASSIUM FLUORIDE
MAGNESIUM FLUORIDE
RROI1INE TRIFLUORIDE
fHOSPIIORUS PENTAFLUORIDE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
AMMONIUM SILICOFLUORIDE
At-MIONIUM FLUORIDE
SODIUM FLUORIDE
SILICON TETRAFLUORIDE
FLilOROTRICHLOROME THANE
FORMALIN
FORMALDEHYDE
FORMAMIDE
Gl ASS, FIBROUS OR DUST
FORMIC ACID
FURFURAL
FURFURYL ALCOHOL
GASOLINES
GASOLINE-LEADED
GASOLINE-LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
GASOLINE UNLEADED
GLYCIDOL
GYPSUM
HAFNIUM
IIFPTACHLOR
HEPTANE
HEXACIILOROETHANE
HFXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE
HEXAFLUOROACETONE
HEXANE
HEXONE
HFXYL ACETATE
HFXYLENE GLYCOL
HIXANEDIOL
DIAMIDCS
HYDPAZINE
DUMINES
HYOROGENATED TERPHENYLS
HYDROGEN BROMIDE
CHLORIDE
CYANIDE
FLUORIDE
PER(IXini:
IIHCIJ«)r.rH '>Ul 1 1 1)1
HYIK noimiiiiH
I 111)1 HI
HYDROGFM
HYDHCGCN
HYD30G1H
-------
PAGE
IHFOn
NOHS
>
1
H"
O
CO
15*3
1510
1510
1510
1510
1510
1515
1517
1520
1520
1520
1520
1520
1521
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
1522
152?
1522
15)0
1512
1534
1536
538
539
•>'.0
560
562
565
43115
A1758
A1759
AI760
39860
52162
40030
04474
MO 130
M0131
40297
70131
80990
A136S
A1319
M0100
110783
33160
33165
33230
B0285
80413
B0414
B041S
80945
80950
80965
81830
81831
81832
82179
82194
82829
83242
83265
83295
83450
84095
84149
84198
84692
84828
40370
40380
40410
40430
40910
B3571
4Q984
40987
40910
25905
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD UEIGHT
7
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
I
7
7
7
7
10
1
1
SUBSTANCE
LtTHIUn HYDRIDE
INDIUM OXIDE INO
INDIUM OXIDE IM20
INDIUM OXIDE IN203
INDIUM
INDIUM OXIDES
IODINE
IODOFORM
FERROUS OXIDE
FERROSOFERRIC OXIDE
IRON OXIDES
IRON OXIDE BLACK
IRON OXIDE YELLOW
IRON PENTACARBONYL
IRON CHLORITE
IRON SULFATES
FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIOE
FERRIC CHLORIDE
FERRIC SULFATE
FERROUS SULFATE
AMMONIUM FERROUS SULFATE
FERRIC AMMONIUM CITRATE
FERROUS FUilARATE
FERROUS GLUCANATE
FERRIC NITRATE
FERRIC SUBSULFATE SOL
FERROUS CARBONATE
FERRIC AMMONIUM SULFATE
FERRIC CITRATE
FERROUS AMMONIUM CITRATE
FERROUS CHLORIDE
FERRIC HYDRIDE
FERRIC ACETYL ACETONATE
FERRIC AMMONIUM NITRATE
IRON DISULFICE
IRON DITHICCARRAMATE
FERRIC CACODYLATE
FERRIC POTASSIUM SULFATE
AMMONIUM FERRIC TARTRATE
FERRIC SULFITE
FERROUS LACTATE
FERRIC AMMONIUM OXALATE
ISOAMYL ACETATE
ISOAMYL ALCOHOL
ISOBUTYL ACETATE
I-SOPUTYL ALCOHOL
1SOPHORONE
ISCPHORONE DIISOCYANATE
ISOP^OPYL ACEtATE
ISOPRUPYL AlCOMOL
IGOPHOPYLAMINE
ISOPRCPYL ETHER
-------
PAGE
10
IHFOM NOHS
>
1
K-1
o
VO
1567
1568
1574
1590
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1511
1591
159J
1595
41150
41775
41840
42510
A1297
A1505
A1768
M0124
M0125
M0126
M0751
M1015
M1387
M1685
M1690
M1691
M1693
Ml 945
M2566
M2935
M3171
113199
M3200
M39AO
42490
42665
80252
80832
81000
81677
81377
82952
83015
83045
83062
83080
83081
83299
83436
83453
83915
84278
84433
84439
84473
84544
84545
84 Vi 6
«
-------
PAGE
11
IHFOM NOHS
1610
1615
1616
1618
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
16?0
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1420
> U20
I 1620
M 1620
*- 1620
0 1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1620
1622
1626
1630
1630
1630
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
16)1
16)1
U 11
80298
80144
80046
43660
M0065
M0921
Ml 134
M1633
M1634
M1784
M2578
M4544
44000
44025
44030
44035
60490
80300
80453
80454
80455
80456
81664
81680
81885
81886
82208
82900
83118
83498
84068
84353
84621
M0804
M0341
A1720
M0475
83751
A1787
M1643
M1767
M2383
M2765
M2769
M4389
44870
44)15
45315
80143
80 10]
8 ICOS
BIO 10
SUBSTANCF
HAZARD WEIGHT
1
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SUBSTANCE
MAGNESIUM OXIDE
MAGNESIUM CARBONATE
MAIATHION
MAIEIC ANHYDRIDE
INORGANIC MANGANATE5
MANGANESE DRIER
MM 2-AMINO-5-CHLORO-PARA-TOLUENESU
MANGANESE TALLATE
MANGANOUS OXIDE
MANGANESE ABIETATE
CALCIUM MANGANESE OCTOATE
MN 2-HAPHTHOL-4.B-DISULFONATE
MANGANESE
INORGANIC MANGANESE COMPOUNDS
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
MANGANESE OXIDES
POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE
MANGANESE LINOLEATE
MANGANESE CITRATE
MANGANESE GIUCONATE
MANGANESE Gl YCEROPHOSPHATE
MANGANESE HYPOPHOSPHI TE
MANGANESE OXIDE
MANGANESE SULFATE
MANGANESE NAPHTHENATE
MANGVIOUS NITRATE
MANGANESE CARBONATE
MANGANESE HYDROXIDE
POTASSIUM MAMGANAIE
MANGANESE TITANATE
MANGANESE PHOSPHATE
MANGANESE CHLORIDE
ACETATE
MANGANESE TRICARBONYL
MANGANESE
CYCLOPENTADIENYL
MARBLE
ETHYL KERCURY CHLORIDE
MERCURY CONTAIDC ORGANOMETALl 1C
MERCURIC ACETATE
MERCURY FULMINATE
MERCURIC SULFIDE REV
MERCURIC SULFIDE. BLACK
MERCURIC SULFIDE
McRCURIC CYANIDE
MERCURIC OXIDE. RFD
MtRCUROUS CHLORIDE
MERCURY
INORGANIC MERCURY
MERCURY OXIDIS
NIRCDRIC OXIDE
(If XCURIC SUI FATE
WRCUK1C MIISA1E
CUKCUKOUS OXIDE
COMPOU
-------
/17/83
PAGE
12
IHFOM NOH5
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1631
1635
1643
1644
1646
1650
1651
1652
1653
1655
1660
1665
1675
1680
1690
1710
— 1720
1730
1735
1735
1740
1750
1767
1768
1770
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1781
1790
1790
1790
1790
1790
1710
1790
1790
1 790
1790
81888
82169
82901
82902
84220
84274
84623
84624
84776
45360
45850
B0027
46210
46410
46435
81894
46450
26075
45930
46470
36340
M0420
37330
M0421
46970
47270
M4755
80619
47030
80105
84547
26540
33850
M0422
47625
47700
47855
M0430
48330
M1533
48535
81971
A1279
M0066
M0097
M0616
110669
MOB70
M110Z
M2 T?2
4R625
4S62B
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
7
3
I
1
1
1
3
3
7
1
1
10
1
7
7
1
1
1
1
10
1
3
1
7
7
7
3
1
7
1
7
7
3
3
3
3
J
3
3
1
3
J
SUBS1ANCE
MERCURIC IODIDE
MERCURIC AMMONIUM CHLORIDE
MERCURIC BROMIDE
MERCURIC THIOCYANATE
TIN MERCAPTIDES
MERCURIC CHLORIDE
MERCURIC IODATE
MERCURIC OXYCYANIDE
MERCUROUS NITRATE
MESITYL OXIDE
METHYL MERCAPTAN
METHOMYL CLANMATE)
METHOXYCHLOR
f.ETHYL ACETATE
METHYL ACETYLEHE
METHYL ACETYLENE-PROPADIENE
METHYL ACRYLATE
METHYLAL
METHYL ALCOHOL
METHYLAMIHE
METHYL H-AMYL KETONE
METHYL BROMIDE
HEXANONE.2-
METHYL CHLORIDE
-TRICHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
METHYL CYANOACRYLATE
METHYL 2-CYANOACRYLATE
METHYLCYCLOIIEXANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE
METHYLCYCLOPENTADIENYL MANGANESE TRICA
METHYL DEMETON
METHYL FORMATE
METHYL IODIDE
METHYL ISOCYANATE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
METHYL PARATHION
METHYL ISOAMYL KETONE
METHYL SILICATE
METHYL STYRENE
MICA
MINERAL WOOl FIBER
FERROMOLY5DEHUM
IHORGANIC MOLYBDATES
INORGANIC MOLYBDENUM COMPOUNDS
MOLYBDENUM III OXIDE
MOLYBDENUM 99
?1HC MQLYBDAfE
AMMONIUM D1MOLYBDATE
Kill YBDf HUM DI HI IOI'IIOSPHATE
1101 YI»IM HUM
MOLYnUI.HUH OXIDES
-------
PAGE
IIIFOH NOHS
1790
1790
1790
1790
1791
1791
1791
1791
1791
1797
1810
1815
1820
1830
1840
1840
1840
'1840
1840
1340
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
1840
IS'. 1
1842
1342
1842
1842
1842
1542
1R42
1/155
I860
l nt 5
M;O
1 fi 1 2
1SSO
|r.93
!''o;
MI2
80056
81897
{.3456
84103
80790
81120
81661
81898
84549
48910
49600
84304
50065
9U90
M0101
MO 7 78
M1782
M1138
50440
50450
50460
50470
50480
50510
74033
81904
81906
81907
82957
83009
t J31 1
83650
84025
84725
50430
M1709
50420
50495
81905
82844
83744
84269
50570
50742
50748
50760
*0775
bO 7 95
50/45
•>03T5
50890
sunsMNct
HAZARD
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
10
10
10
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
J
10
1
I
1
I
1
/
J
7
SUBSTANCE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIOE
MOLYBOATE ORANGE
MOLYBDENUM PENTACMIORIDE
OUINOLINE MOLYBDATE
AMMONIUM MOLYBDATE (VI)
SODIUM fiOLYBDATE (VI)
MOIYBDOPHOSPHORIC ACID
MOLYB01C ACID
MOLYBDENUM 1RIOXIDE
MORPHOLINE
NAPHTHALEIIE
HAPHIHYLAMINE
NAPHTHYLA'IINE
LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS
INORGANIC NICKEL COMPOUNDS
NICKEL TITANATE
NICKEL -ANTIMONY TITANATE
TITANIUM. NICKEL. ANTIMONY COMPLEX
NICKEL CHLORIDE
NICKEL FLUORIDE
FLUOBORATE
NICKEL SULFAMATE
NICKEL NIIRATE
NICKEL SULFATE
NICKEL FORMATE
NICKEL SALTS
NICKEL ACETATE
NICKCL AMMONIUM SULFATE
NICKEL OCTUATE
NICKEL BROMIDE
NICKEL DITHIOCARBAMATE
NICKEL NAPHTIIEHAIE
NICKEL 'iBUTYLDI.IETHYCARBAMATE
ORGANIC NICKCL COMPOUNDS
NICKEL CARBOHYL
NICKEL PHOSPHATE
NICKEL
NICKEL OXIDES
NICKFL CARBONATE
NICKFL CYANIDE
NICKEL SUIFIDE
NICKEL OXIDE
NICOTINE
NIIRIC ACID
HIIROANIlIHE
NI IRODENZEIIE
NIIROCIILORUBtNZENE.P
IMTROETHAHE
NI IRIC OXIDE
NIIROGFM DIOXIDE
MIIROCEN IRItLUORIDE
HI IROGLYCEIf IN
-------
/17/83
PAGE
1HFOM NOHS
U)
1913
1920
1940
1941
1942
1145
1945
1953
1954
1957
1960
1970
1975
19AO
1982
1962
1964
1969
1990
2000
2000
2010
2017
2020
2030
2033
2035
2037
2037
2040
2041
2042
2047
2057
2060
2065
2070
2060
2085
2090
2090
2090
2091
2092
2093
2110
2120
2125
2125
21?7
2110
2130
32385
50910
51100
51090
51110
51115
41910
51118
M4718
51705
52370
52480
M0153
81651
53900
84723
53920
54160
54243
A1550
MOtOO
54480
83786
54790
54800
54810
111940
M0630
M2C29
55460
84116
56950
57210
57240
57300
M0373
57710
57740
58520
M0004
M0005
81650
59160
59162
59166
59230
59450
110291
60110
m:'57
AlilJl
84642
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD UEIGHT
10
1
3
10
10
1
1
3
1
1
3
10
3
1
7
7
7
7
1
10
10
1
1
7
10
7
1
10
10
10
7
7
3
7
7
3
7
10
1
10
10
10
7
1
7
7
7
1
I
7
7
SUBSTANCE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
NITR0.1ETHANE
NITROPROPANE.l
NITROPRGPANE.2
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE
NITROTOLUENE
NITROTOLUENE.ORTHO
NITROUS OXIDE
NONANE
OCTANE
OSMIUM TETROXIDE
OXAIIC ACID
OXYGEN DIFLUORIDE
OZONE
PARAQUAT
PARAQUAT DICIILORIDE
PARATHION
PENTACHLOROPNENOL
PENTANE
PARAFFIN WAX FUME
PARAFFIN WAX
2-PENTANONE
PICIORAM (TORDON)
TETKACHIOROEIHYIEHE
PERCHLOROMETHYL MERCAPTAN
PERCHIORYL FLUORIDE
PEHLITE
NAPTHA-SOLVENT
PETROLEUM NAPHTHA
PHENOL
PHENOTHIAZINE
PIIENYLENE DIAMINE
DIPHENYL OXIDE
PHENYl GLYCIDYl ETHER
PHENYLHYORAZINE
METHYL3-(DIMETHOXYPHOSPHINYLOXY)CROTON
PHOSGENE
PHOSPIIINE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
PHOSPHORUS(UHITE)
rilOSPHORUS
PHOSPHOROUS
PHOSPHOROUS PENTACHLORIDE
PHOSPHOROUS PENTASULFIDE
PHOSPHOROUS TRICHLORIDE
PHIHALIC ANHYDRIDE
PICRIC ACID
PIWALYL-1.3-INDANDIONE
PINDONE
PLASirR
PLAIItllin TRIOXIDFS
PLATIIIUM CHLORIDE
-------
PACE
IS
IHFOM NOHS
2135
2135
2140
2U3
2167
2170
2180
2190
2210
2213
2215
2216
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2225
2226
2227
2227
2228
2229
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2230
2232
2235
2236
2237
22 I rt HI IX I IE
SIIVIP Dlt'Tim DITHinCARRArlAlE
HOIASSlUfl SllUIR CYANIDL
-------
9/J/>«3
PAGE
16
IHFOM NOHS
2240
2243
2250
2260
2270
2275
2280
2290
2310
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2327
2330
2334
2335
2339
2340
2350
> 2360
I 2370
•- 2390
Ł 2410
2420
2420
2422
2425
2427
2427
2430
2430
2430
2430
2430
2430
2430
2430
2430
2431
2431
2431
2431
2431
2431
2431
?4 Jl
2411
2.
-------
PAGE
IMfOfl
NOHS
SUBSTANCE
HAZARD WEIGHT
2432
2432
2449
2440
2440
2460
2470
2470
2470
2470
2470
2470
2470
2475
2475
2477
2480
2483
2485
2490
2495
2500
> 2505
I 2510
Ł 2530
Ł 2532
2532
2535
2537
2537
2537
2'>37
2j37
2537
2537
2537
2537
2537
2537
2537
2037
2540
2540
2560
2060
2560
2560
?570
?070
.'570
. •> 70
."' ') 7 1
73253
82157
A1211
M0913
73258
73300
M0788
M1908
M1939
M2B74
M3831
M4270
73390
73470
83655
73730
74175
73870
84248
73790
73770
M0424
74405
73960
74550
74600
82880
74635
A1003
AI369
M0070
74980
Ł0230
81758
82032
82043
82854
83473
83488
83489
84213
M1322
74990
MI465
A2044
B20'.5
8?0'i6
AIOIO
AMD 1
A 1 S n .->
Al SO \
M 1 7 ? 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
10
1
3
7
1
7
10
1
10
3
10
7
7
1
7
3
3
7
7
3
3
7
7
3
3
3
7
7
7
10
10
10
10
7
7
7
TOULEME
TOLUENE
TOLUEHE
TOLUENE
SUBSTANCE
TIN OXIDE
STAHHOUS OXIDE
T ITANIUM. OXIDES OF
CI PIGMENT 77891-PIGMENT UNITE 6
TITANIUM DIOXIDE
TOLUENE
TOLUENE-2.6-DIISOCYANATE
TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE TERPOLYMER
DIISOCYANAIE-POlYGlrCOl-HlDROX
DIISOCYANATE POLYMER ADDUCT
DIISOCYANATE
DIISOCYANATE-MODIFIED SAFFLOUE
TOLUENE-2.4-OIISOCYANATE
TOLUIDINE.ORTHO
TOLUIDINE
TRIBUTYL PHOSPHATE
TRIETHYLAMINE
TRICHLORONAPHTHALENE
TRICHLORO-1.2.2-TRIFLUOROETHANE.1.1.2-
TRICHLOROETHYLEHE
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRIFLUOROBROMOMETHANE
TRIMETHYLBEHZEHE
TRICHLOROPROPANE
TRIHITROTOIUENE
TRIURTHOCRESYL PHOSPHATE
TRI-CPESYL PHOSPHATE
TR1PHEHYL PHOSPHATE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
AnilOHIUM P-TUHGSTATE
IHORGANIC TUNGSIATE
TUNGSTEN
TUNGSTEN CARBIDE
CAICI'JM TUHGGIATE
TUHGSIEN HEXAFLUORIDE
TUNGSTIC ACID
TUNGSTEN DISULFIDE
SILICO TUNGSTIC ACID
TUNGSTEN HEXACKLORI DE
TUNGSTOPHOSPHATE
TUUGST1C ANHYDRIDE
TURPTNTINE (GUM)
TURPENIIME
INORGANIC URANIUM COMPOUNDS
URANIUM ACETATE
URANIUM ZIMC ACETATE
(JtAHYL NITRATE
VAHADIoM OXIDFS
vAtiADiiin oxinr vo
VANADIUM OX 11)1 V02
WAN \IJIIII1 OXIl:f V?0 \
VAHADIUIH W205l)USt , V205FUt1E)
-------
17/63
PAGE
18
IHFOM NOUS
2570
2570
2572
2577
2580
2531
2582
2583
2584
2584
2586
2587
2590
2590
2590
2590
2590
2592
2600
2602
2610
2610
> 2611
I 2611
Ł 2612
^ 2612
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2620
2650
2651
2681
2682
2683
2683
2683
2663
2720
2720
2740
76165
76210
76 ISOCYANATE
DIQUAT DIBROM1DE
DISULFURAI1
Dl(fERT-BUTYL)-PARA-CRE50L.2.6-
DI-TERT-BUTYl-4-METHYLPHENOL.2.6-
BUTYLATtD HYDROXYTOIUENES
DHTERT-DUTYl ) -P AR A-CRESOL
DIE1-0-C2- ISOPR-6-ME-4-PYRIMDIMYL) PH
DlA7INON
DIOXATHION
-------
PAGE
19
IMF Ofl NOHS
2750
5010
50in
9010
9010
9010
9013
9010
9010
901 J
901)
9011
4020
9020
9U20
9010
90SO
9050
9050
90S5
9090
9210
9210
84542
52131
52138
M1806
21305
66495
67915
74617
90800
H1765
H1S07
M4JJ1
A1011
71525
90)10
71055
M1512
80542
84055
68768
17)66
Ml 127
$4220
SU35T4-.CE
HAZARD UtlGHT
3
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
10
SUBSTANCE
ETHION
CUTTING OIL MIST
LUTRICATIIIG OIL MIST
SILICA FLOUR
SILICA (QUARTZ) RESPIRABLE
QUARTZ
SAND
TRIDYMITE
FLINT
PYROGENIC SILICA
COLLOIDAL SILICA
SILICA. FUSED
ASCARITE
TREr-OLITE
ASBESTOS
TALC
SILICA GEL
SILICA. FUMED
DIATOMACEOUS EARTH-NATURAL
SOAPSTONE
GPAPH.ITE
MOOD FIBER
WOOD DUST. NON-ALLERGENIC
03959 RECORDS PRINTED
a. Industrial Hygiene Field Operations Manual Code for Substances.
b. NIOSH National Occupational Hazard Survey Code for Substances.
c. Federal OSHA Hazard Weight: "1" and "3" indicate substances causing acute health effects
indicate substances causing chronic effects. "10" is the most severe hazard weight.
"7" and "10"
-------
APPENDIX 7
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IN SELECTED INDUSTRIES BY
WEIGHTED INDEX
Appendix 7 lists potentially hazardous substances evaluated in the National Occupa-
tional Health Survey (NOHS) by industry, for industries listed in Table 4-11 (Section 4 of
this report). OSHA assigned a weighted index to each of these substances, derived from an
exposure factor, exposure index and hazard weight, and subsequently developed a composite
weighted index for each industry (explained in Section 4). The composite weighted index
is not included in these tables.
The substance listings are by industry and give the Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) .and description of the industry, plus total employment and number of firms surveyed
in the given industry in NOHS. For each SIC, the top 80 substances are listed (unless
fewer than 80 substances were evaluated for an industry) in descending order of weighted
index. The substances are identified by the IHFOM (Industrial Hygiene Field Operation
Manual) code, the NOHS code, and substance description. IHFOM codes are listed in
Appendix 6.
All manufacturing industries (SIC codes 2000 to 3999) are listed by 4-digit SIC. All
non-manufacturing industries are listed only by 3-digit classification. For example, SIC
1750, "carpeting and flooring", contains data from 4-digit SIC's 1751, "carpeting", and 1752,
"floor laying and floor work, not elsewhere classified". SIC codes are listed in Appendix
11.
A-119
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1540 NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION
---HOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7,395
98
IHFOM
CODE
9210
2037
0577
C9020
9050
2590
0290
2080
9030
2460
9090
1591
^ 0686
7 2090
i- 9010
K> 1520
0 0560
1340
0490
1842
2360
2370
1290
0230
1591
1779
9010
0527
0230
0686
1631
0360
2420
0686
(T630
2537
C0260
1591
2229
5010
0374
NOHS
CODE
94220
M2829
17695
90310
84055
76720
90320
57740
71055
73300
17366
42490
80064
81650
67915
40297
17460
90880
15630
50495
71640
71860
33640
07310
42685
48535
M1806
80243
A1433
19395
45315
11855
72085
81876
90510
A1003
07555
84546
M1463
52138
80517
MOODS
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
CEMEHT-PORTLAND
ASBESTOS
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
XYLENE
ASPHALT
PHOSPHINE
TALC
TOLUENE
GRAPHITE
LEAD
FOTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
SAND
IRON OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
GASOLINE-LEADED
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
FORMALDEHYDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD OXIDES
MICA
SILICA FLOUR
CARBON
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
CHROMIUM
MERCURY OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2O SALT (1:1)
CHLORODIPHENYLS
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
IRON OXIDE. RED
OIL. LUBE
SODIUM BORATE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
3.122
1,389
1,691
1.120
1.380
1.308
839
645
860
818
807
553
489
487
660
649
645
437
371
371
529
529
337
325
316
446
428
299
294
292
277
274
274
266
259
369
257
257
352
225
314
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.422
.187
.228
.151
.186
.176
.113
.087
.116
.110
.109
.074
.066
.065
.089
.087
.087
.059
.050
.050
.071
.071
.045
.043
.042
.060
.057
.040
.039
.039
.037
.037
.037
.035
.035
.049
.034
.034
.047
.030
.042
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
WEIGHTE
INDEX
4.221
.878
.600
.514
.306
.238
.134
.872
.814
.774
.763
.747
.661
.658
.624
.614
.610
.590
.501
.501
.500
.500
.455
.439
.427
.422
.405
.404
.397
.394
.374
.370
.370
.359
.350
.349
.347
.347
. 333
.304
.297
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OK STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1540 NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7.395 98
IHFOM
CODE
2000
2620
2490
2570
1620
2611
1430
1018
0933
1591
1631
0990
2530
•> 25J2
, 0020
M 1340
NJ 2682
M C2650
2040
1536
1720
1912
2120
0686
1913
1591
2427
0921
0570
1591
0522
0160
2505
1591
1591
2540
1790
0430
0926
NOHS
CODE
M0600
M0626
73790
A1010
44035
77150
38580
M0347
81806
A1768
A1787
27125
74550
82880
01568
90883
80219
83341
55460
40430
46970
50890
59450
M0063
32585
91160
71900
25210
17493
83453
15800
20265
74405
M0126
M1693
74990
48628
13980
27615
PARAFFIN
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
ETHYLEME. TRICHLORO-
VANAOIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
ZINC CHLORIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. »IS(2-
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
LEAD AZIDE
MERCURY FULMINATE
DIHITROTOLUENE, 2.4-
TRINITROTOLUENE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ACETIC ACID
GASOLIHE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
HOCA
PHENOL
ISOEUTYL ALCOHOL
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1-
N1TROGLYCERIN
PICRIC ACID
INORGANIC CHROMATES
ETHYLEME GLYCOL
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
TETRAI1ETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
DIETHYLENETRIAMINE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
CAMPHOR
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TRIMETHVLBENZENE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD SOAP
TURPENTINE
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
BUTANONE, 2-
DIPHtNYLAMINE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
214
296
275
274
274
183
257
178
592
175
175
175
175
239
237
166
158
158
157
154
213
175
175
120
118
115
161
160
109
107
141
320
94
93
91
123
274
819
261
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.028
.040
.037
.037
.037
.024
.034
.024
.080
.023
.023
.023
.023
.032
.032
.022
.021
.021
.021
.020
.028
.023
.023
.016
.015
.015
.021
.021
.014
.014
.019
.043
.012
.012
.012
.016
.037
.110
.035
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
03
10
10
10
07
03
01
03
.289
.280
.260
.259
.259
.247
.243
.240
.240
.236
.236
.236
.236
.226
.224
.224
.213
.213
.212
.208
.201
.165
.165
.162
.159
.155
.152
.151
.147
. 144
.133
.129
.127
.125
.123
. 116
.111
.110
. 105
282 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1540
OTHER TOTALS-'
51.418
6.814
42.632
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1610 HIGHWAY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3.799 54
>
1
1— 1
K)
K>
IHFOM
CODE
0290
2037
2590
0577
9210
2460
2360
2370
1340
9090
5010
9030
C9020
9050
0686
2090
9010
9010
1779
0490
1842
2532
2505
1340
0290
0686
2611
1520
1591
0360
1591
•1631
2420
1591
2490
2537
0374
2080
2570
1620
1913
NOHS
CODE
90320
M2829
76720
17695
94220
73300
71640
71860
90880
17366
52138
71055
90310
84055
80064
81650
67915
M1806
48535
15630
50495
82880
74405
90883
80636
M0063
77150
40297
83453
11855
42685
45315
72085
91160
73790
A1003
80517
57740
A1010
44035
12365
ASPHALT
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
XYLENE
CEMENT-PORTLAND
HOODS
TOLUENE
TE1RAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
GASOLINE-LEADED
GRAPHITE
OIL. LUBE
TALC
ASBESTOS
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
SAND
SILICA FLOUR
MICA
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
GASOLINE. LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
ASPHALT VOLATILES
INORGANIC CHROMATES
ZIHC CHLORIDE
IRON OXIDES
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORQ-
miGSTEH OXIDES
SODIUM BORATE
PHOSPHIHE
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.606
693
667
574
358
510
487
487
341
420
293
356
226
300
209
209
275
236
236
159
159
220
146
146
144
137
137
186
116
115
115
115
115
115
162
159
157
88
115
115
70
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.422
.182
.175
.151
.094
.134
.128
.128
.089
.110
.077
.093
.059
.078
.055
.055
.072
.062
.062
.041
.041
.057
.038
.038
.037
.036
.036
.048
.030
.030
.030
.030
.030
.030
.042
.041
.041
.023
.030
.030
.018
HAZARD
UEIGHT
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
UEIGHTEI
INDEX
4.227
1.824
1.229
1.057
.942
.939
.897
.897
.897
.773
.771
.655
.594
.552
.550
.550
.506
.434
.434
.418
.418
.405
.384
.384
.37*
.360
.360
.342
.305
.302
.302
.302
.302
.302
.29!
.292
.281
.231
.211
.211
.184
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOUS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1610 HIGHWAY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3.799 54
1
»-•
K)
Ul
IHFOn
CODE
0933
0527
0560
2229
1591
0230
0230
1591
0570
2000
1790
1380
0810
1371
1740
1957
0874
0310
0867
2620
1720
1290
2682
C2650
0230
0926
0505
1560
1,790
C0260
2020
1660
1060
0160
0020
2427
1591
0921
2540
NOHS
CODE
81806
80243
17460
M1463
M1693
A1433
07310
42490
17490
M0600
80056
36955
21190
36060
47030
51705
24130
M2929
24003
M0626
46970
33640
80219
83341
M2725
27615
15705
40987
48628
07545
54790
45930
31500
20265
015(8
71900
M0125
25210
74990
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
CARBON
CARBON MONOXIDE
IRON OXIDE, RED
LEAD SOAP
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
PARAFFIN
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
HEXANE
CYCLOHEXANE
HEPTANE
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
OCTANE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
DICHIOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1-
FORMALDEHYDE
TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
MOCA
AHTIMONY DIALKYLDITHIOCARBAMATE
DIPHEIIYLAMINE
C/LCIUM CARBONATE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
ARSEHIC
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
KETHAHOl
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ACETIC ACID
TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
LEAD MONOXIDE
DIETHYLENETRIAMINE
TURPENTINE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
224
63
88
86
58
56
56
56
52
51
169
501
487
489
487
487
44
422
41
56
56
39
38
38
37
123
353
350
115
33
46
43
95
91
38
38
25
35
35
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.058
.016
.023
.022
.015
.014
.014
.014
.013
.013
.044
.131
.128
.128
.128
.128
.011
.111
.010
.014
.014
.010
.010
.010
.009
.032
.092
.092
.030
.008
.012
.011
.025
.023
.010
.010
.006
.009
.009
HAZARD
WEIGHT
03
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
01
01
01
01
01
10
01
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
03
01
01
03
10
07
07
03
03
07
07
10
07
07
WEIGHTE
INDEX
.176
.165
.162
.158
.152
.147
.147
.147
.136
.134
.133
.131
.128
.128
.128
.128
.115
.111
.107
.103
.103
.102
.100
.100
.097
.097
.092
.092
.090
.086
.084
.079
.075
.071
.070
.070
.065
.064
.064
192 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1610
OTHER TOTALS:
20.246
5.236
31 .600
-------
ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS .
1620 HEAVY CONSTRUCTION. EXCEPT HIGHWAY
DESCRIPTION
44
IHFOM
CODE
0490
1842
2080
1631
2037
1591
0360
2420
9050
9090
C9020
1520
t, 0560
=f 2570
M 1620
KJ 2229
*• 5010
2000
1842
1591
2590
0686
2090
1591
2490
1591
2532
9210
2611
0686
0374
1591
1340
2537
0290
2460
9030
0645
1790
0230
2360
NOHS
CODE
15630
50495
57740
45315
M2829
42685
11855
72085
84055
17366
90310
40297
17460
A1010
44035
M1463
52131
M0600
84269
M1693
76720
80064
81650
81000
73790
M0751
82880
94220
77150
M0063
80517
91160
90880
A1003
90320
73300
71055
29010
48628
07310
71640
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
MERCURY OXIDES
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
LEAD OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
GRAPHITE
ASBESTOS
IRON OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
IRON OXIDE. RED
OIL. CUTTING
PARAFFIN
NICKEL OXIDE
LEAD SOAP
XYLENE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
LEAD SUBOXIDE
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
WOODS
ZINC CHLORIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
SODIUM BORATE
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
GASOLINE-LEADED
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ASPHALT
TOLUENE
TALC
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
ANTINOMY
TETRAETHYL LEAD
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
806
806
759
751
750
725
724
724
1.031
972
552
774
759
724
724
582
398
397
389
372
519
362
348
346
482
333
465
314
292
287
402
268
258
355
246
339
338
235
724
207
278
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.207
.207
.195
.193
.193
.186
.186
.186
.265
.250
.142
.199
.195
.186
.186
.149
.102
.102
.100
.095
.133
.093
.089
.089
.124
.085
.119
.080
.075
.073
.103
.069
.066
.091
.063
.087
.087
.060
.186
.053
.071
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 2.075
10 2.075
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
.954
.933
.930
.866
.864
.864
.858
.751
.421
.394
.367
.304
.304
.048
.024
.022
.001
10 .957
07 .935
10 .932
10 .895
10 .890
07 .868
10 .857
07 .838
10 .808
10 .751
10 .738
07 .724
10 .690
10 .664
07 .639
10 .633
07 .610
07 .609
10 .605
03 .559
10 .532
07 .501
-------
1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
620
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED IHDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
HEAVY CONSTRUCTION. EXCEPT HIGHWAY
DESCRIPTION
3.884
44
IHFOM
CODE
2370
0230
1591
1790
5010
1290
9010
2620
0577
1060
2040
1030
0933
> 0686
I 0760
*-• 0867
*•> 1591
1/1 0530
1980
2440
0730
2587
2540
0310
1520
1913
0160
2682
C2650
0686
C0260
0020
1520
1520
0522
1720
1018
COJ20
1660
NOHS
CODE
71860
A1433
42490
80056
52138
33640
67915
M0626
17695
M0238
55460
04980
81806
81876
20380
24003
83453
17367
81651
A1211
20170
76618
74990
M2929
80990
52i8t>
20265
80219
83341
M0900
07545
01568
M0130
70131
15800
46970
M0347
09070
45930
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
LEAD
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
OIL. LUBE
FORMALDEHYDE
SAND
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
CEMENT-PORTLAND
ALCOHOL
PHENOL
ETHANOLAMINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2+) SALT (1:1)
CPESOL
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
CARBON DIOXIDE
OZONE
TITANIUM. OXIDES OF
COPPER OXIDES
MELDING RODS
TURPENTINE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONAfE
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
fcTHVLL.^C CLVCGL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
MOCA
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04). ZINC SALT (1-1)
ARSENIC
ACETIC ACID
FERROUS OXIDE
IROh OXIDE (FE304)
CAMPHOR
TRICIILOROETHANE. 1.1,1-
ETIIYLHEXYL) PHTHALAIE, BIS(2-
BENZENE
MEIIIAHOL
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
278
190
190
633
185
145
193
192
192
441
129
415
348
96
93
87
84
805
759
724
724
724
103
716
101
70
217
*4
64
61
60
7>
72
72
70
69
47
47
65
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.071
.048
.048
.162
.047
.037
.049
.049
.049
.113
.033
.106
.089
.024
.023
.022
.021
.207
.195
.186
.186
.186
.026
.184
.026
.018
.055
.016
.016
.015
.015
.019
.018
.018
.018
.017
.012
.012
.016
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
10
10
03
10
10
07
07
07
03
10
03
03
10
10
10
10
01
01
01
01
01
07
01
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.501
.489
.489
.488
.476
.373
.347
.346
.346
.340
.332
.320
.268
.247
.239
.223
.216
.207
.195
.186
.186
.186
.185
.184
.182
.180
.167
.164
.164
.157
.154
.138
.129
. 129
. 126
. 124
. 121
. 121
.117
222 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1620
OTHER TOTALS:
38.700
9.865
60.607
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
PLUMBING, HEATING. AIR CONDITIONING
DESCRIPTION
LEAD OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
LEAD SUBOXIDE
OIL. CUTTING
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
LEAD
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDES
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ZINC CHLORIDE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
IRON OXIDE, RED
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
GRAPHITE
PHOSPHINE
ASBESTOS
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
TOLUENE
STANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
STANNOUS OXIDE
XYLENE
CRESOL
CARBON MONOXIDE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
ASPHALT
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1-
CARDON TETRACHLORIDE
DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2-
CliLORIHE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2,365
55
IHFOM
CODE
1591
0490
1842
1591
5010
2037
1591
9050
1520
0230
0230
2611
> 0360
1 1631
|- 2420
Ł 2229
1591
1591
1591
1591
9090
2080
C9020
2537
2620
2570
1620
2460
2432
2432
2432
2590
0760
0560
2490
0290
1720
0570
0874
0640
0656
NOHS
CODE
42685
15630
50495
81000
52131
M2829
42490
84055
40297
07310
A1433
77150
11855
45315
72085
M1463
M0125
M0126
81677
84544
17366
57740
90310
A1003
M0626
A1010
44035
73300
M0877
73253
82157
76720
20380
17460
73790
90320
46970
17490
24130
1A040
A0064
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
833
724
696
696
624
593
567
760
711
487
481
476
467
467
467
656
439
439
433
433
611
377
375
512
^81
467
467
461
412
412
412
405
268
377
365
246
349
213
213
283
197
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.352
.306
.294
.294
.263
.250
.239
.321
.300
.205
.203
.201
.197
.197
.197
.277
.185
.185
.183
.183
.258
.159
.158
.216
.203
.197
.197
.194
.174
.174
.174
.171
.113
.159
.154
.104
.147
.090
.090
.119
.083
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
3.522
3.061
2.942
2.942
2.638
2.507
2.397
2.249
2.104
2.059
2.033
2.012
1.974
1.974
.974
.941
.856
.856
.830
.830
.808
.594
.585
.515
.423
.382
.382
1.364
1.219
1.219
.219
.198
.133
.115
.080
.040
.032
.900
.900
.837
.832
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAH
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
ID PLUMBING, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2,365
55
1HFOM
CODE
2090
C0320
2532
2170
2000
0867
1520
1520
1520
2037
0540
2020
1660
0160
1030
0527
1913
1790
1591
1430
2540
0220
C0260
0686
1591
1280
9210
1060
1842
0830
0686
1060
0933
9030
0374
0070
1790
1591
0820
NOHS
CODE
81650
09070
82880
M0256
M0600
24003
M0130
70131
80990
M0630
17370
54790
45930
20265
04980
80243
32385
48628
M1693
38580
74990
06580
07555
81876
84546
81945
94220
M023B
84269
21660
M0063
31500
81806
71055
80517
03298
80056
91160
21560
PHOSPHORUS
BEHZENE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
PROPANOL. 1-
PARAFFIN
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
FERROUS OXIDE
IROH OXIDE (FE304)
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
METHANOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ETHANOLAMINE
CARBON
ETHYLENE GLYCOl
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
LEAD SOAP
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
TURPENTINE
ANILINE
ARSENIC OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1=1)
LEAD SULFATE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
WOODS
ALCOHOL
NICKEL OXIDE
CYCLOHEXAHONE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
ETHYL ALCOHOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
TALC
SODIUM BORATE
ACETYLENE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
CYCLOHEXANOL
219 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1710
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
197
195
271
183
180
179
255
255
255
178
178
229
224
509
486
143
141
467
139
188
181
178
121
121
121
102
101
301
81
260
74
245
244
98
93
629
199
57
188
39,662
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.083
.082
.114
.077
.076
.075
.107
.107
.107
.075
.075
.096
.094
.215
.205
.060
.059
.197
.058
.079
.076
.075
.051
.051
.051
.043
.042
.127
.034
.109
.031
.103
.103
.041
.039
.265
.OA4
.024
.079
16.671
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
03
03
10
10
03
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
10
03
10
03
03
07
07
01
03
10
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.832
.824
.802
.773
.761
.756
.754
.754
.754
.752
.752
.677
.663
.645
.616
.604
.596
.592
.587
.556
.535
.526
.511
.511
.511
.431
.427
.381
.342
.329
.312
.310
.309
.290
.275
.265
.252
. 2<» 1
.238
101 .719
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1720 PAINTING. PAPER HANGING, DECORATING
DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
537
16
IHFOM
CODE
2037
0290
2460
C0320
9210
2590
C9020
9050
0686
1591
1591
C0260
1591
> 0686
' 1913
Ł 1*60
oo 10U
1591
9090
2540
2000
2540
1591
1591
C0260
1631
1536
0230
0490
0720
1240
1842
2230
1660
0527
0374
2583
1620
9010
2620
OB74
NOHS
CODE
M2829
90320
73300
09070
94220
76720
90310
84055
81876
M0125
MO 126
07555
84546
M0900
32385
50742
M0347
80252
17366
74990
M0600
K1322
A1297
M0751
07545
45315
40430
07310
15570
19770
33595
50420
68295
45930
80243
80517
83011
44000
66405
77265
241 JO
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ASPHALT
TOLUENE
BENZENE
MOODS
XYLENE
ASBESTOS
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2O SALT (1:1)
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
NITRIC ACID
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
LEAD CARBONATE
GRAPHITE
TURPENTINE
PARAFFIN
TURPENTINE (GUM)
LEAD CARBONATE. BASIC
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
ARSENIC
MERCURY OXIDES
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
ANTIMONY
CADMIUM
COBALT
FLUORSPAR
NICKEL
SELENIUM
METHANOL
CARBON
SODIUM BORATE
DICHLOROETHYLENE. 1.1-
MANGANESE
QUARTZ
ZIRCONIUM
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
278
271
302
202
186
210
140
193
135
119
119
105
105
104
102
93
89
86
122
116
78
107
72
72
72
72
71
69
69
69
69
69
69
94
60
75
50
69
69
69
48
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.517
.504
.562
.376
.346
.391
.260
.359
.251
.221
.221
.195
.195
.193
.189
.173
.165
.160
.227
.216
.145
.199
.134
.134
.134
.134
.132
.128
.128
.128
.128
.128
.128
.175
.111
.139
.093
. 128
. 128
.128
.089
HAZARD UEIGHTEC
UEIGHT INDEX
10 5.176
10 5.046
07 3.936
10 3.761
10 3.463
07 2.737
10 2.607
07 2.515
10 2.513
10 2.216
10 2.216
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
.955
.955
.936
.899
.731
.657
.601
.590
.512
.452
.394
.340
.340
.340
.340
.322
.284
.284
.284
.284
.284
.284
.225
.117
07 .977
10 .931
07 .899
07 .899
07 .899
10 .893
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEICHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1720 PAINTING. PAPER HANGING, DECORATING
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
537
16
IHFOH
CODE
1060
1060
0933
1170
1989
2229
1720
1779
0570
156A
0686
0645
> ll™
I 1591
)- 0630
to 0505
^ 2610
9030
1230
2581
1520
0686
2090
1560
C9020
1591
2020
2490
0430
0170
0460
1010
1941
1970
9010
1610
1040
1520
1520
NOHS
CODE
31500
M0218
81806
46935
54160
M1461
46970
48535
17490
41775
19395
29010
32550
42490
90510
15705
77HO
71055
32940
M1392
40297
80064
81650
40987
73525
84743
54790
73790
13980
05250
13850
25145
51090
52480
67915
80298
31470
70111
80990
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ALCOHOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
PENTACHLOROPHEHOL
IRON OXIDE. RED
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1-
MICA
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
KAOLIN
CHROMIUM
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
ETHYLENE OXIDE
LEAD
CHLOPODIPHENYLS
CALCIUM CARBONATE
ZINC OXIDE
TALC
ETHYL SILICATE
VINYL CYCLOHEXENE DIOXIDE
IRON OXIDES
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
TREMOLITE
LEAD SILICOCHROMATE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLEHE, TRICHLORO-
BUTANONE. 2-
AMMONIA
BUTANOL
DIOXAHE. 1,4-
NITROPROPANE, 2-
OXALIC ACID
SAND
MAGNESIUM OXIDE
ETHYL ACETATE
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
159
140
133
117
50
48
48
47
32
308
30
30
30
30
30
276
247
35
71
30
30
21
21
205
19
19
26
26
180
24
167
16
16
16
22
115
131
19
19
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.296
.260
.247
.217
.093
.089
.089
.087
.059
.573
.055
.055
.055
.055
.055
.513
.459
.065
.132
.055
.055
.039
.039
.381
.035
.035
.048
.048
.335
.044
.310
.029
.029
.029
.040
.251
.247
.035
.035
HAZARD
HEIGHT
03
03
03
03
07
07
07
07
10
01
10
10
10
10
10
01
01
07
03
07
07
10
10
01
10
10
07
07
01
07
01
10
10
10
07
01
01
07
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.888
.782
.743
.653
.651
.625
.625
.612
.595
.573
.558
.558
.558
.558
.558
.513
.459
.456
.396
.391
.391
.391
.391
.381
.353
.353
.338
.338
.335
.312
.310
.297
.297
.297
.286
.251
.247
.247
.247
154 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1720
OTHER TOTALS
9.771
18.112
102.271
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1730 ELECTRICAL UORK
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
-—NOHS SURVEYED—
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3.456
43
H-
OJ
O
IHFOM
CODE
5010
2037
2000
2611
9090
0686
1591
2532
0290
C9020
0374
5010
9030
2490
1720
1591
0686
0230
9050
9210
1060
C0260
1591
0686
2090
2590
1591
1591
0640
1591
1591
1790
1591
0230
1030
0720
1970
1340
0527
2540
2460
NOHS
CODE
52131
M2829
M0600
77150
17366
M0063
91160
82880
90320
90310
80517
52138
71055
73790
46970
83453
81876
07310
84055
94220
M0238
07555
84546
80064
81650
76720
M0125
M0126
18040
81000
42490
80056
42685
A1433
04980
80347
52480
M0541
M0647
74990
73100
DESCRIPTION
OIL, CUTTING
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
PARAFFIN
ZINC CHLORIDE
GRAPHITE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ASPHALT
ASBESTOS
SODIUM BORATE
OIL. LUBE
TALC
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1-
LEAD HAPHTHENATE
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2O SALT (1=1)
AHTIMONY
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
WOODS
ALCOHOL
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
XYLENE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
CHLORINE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
LEAD OXIDES
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ETHANOLAHINE
COBALT NAPHTHENATE
OXALIC ACID
GASOLINES
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
TURPENTINE
TOLUENE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.150
1.032
972
624
816
561
559
776
507
497
691
477
625
573
556
352
326
319
454
299
987
287
287
283
283
355
238
238
340
235
226
734
218
211
685
201
200
199
199
263
257
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.332
.298
.281
.180
.236
.162
.161
.224
.146
.143
.199
.138
.180
.165
.160
.101
.094
.092
.131
.086
.285
.083
.083
.081
.081
.102
.068
.068
.098
.067
.065
.212
.063
.061
.198
.058
.057
.057
.057
.076
.074
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
03
10
10
03
10
10
10
10
07
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
3.327
2.986
2.812
1.805
1.652
1.623
1.617
1.571
1.467
.438
.399
.380
.265
.160
.126
.018
.943
.923
.919
.865
.856
.830
.830
.818
.818
.719
.688
.688
.688
.679
.653
.637
.630
.610
.594
.581
.578
.575
.575
.532
.520
-------
1C
730
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
ELECTRICAL WORK
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALfH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
UITH
HOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOUS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3,456
43
IHFOM
CODE
1591
2229
1060
1591
1591
2620
1018
15)6
1779
0490
0720
1280
1842
2230
2432
2432
2432
1631
0490
1842
0926
0680
C2580
1620
9010
2620
0933
0360
2080
2420
0830
0577
1520
1430
0860
0160
2040
0760
0570
NOHS
CODE
M1693
M1463
31500
81677
84544
M0626
M0347
40430
48535
15570
19770
33595
50420
68295
M0877
73253
82157
45315
15630
50495
27615
18260
76445
44000
66495
77265
81806
11855
57740
72085
21660
17695
40297
38580
M4016
20265
55460
20380
17490
DESCRIPTION
LEAD SOAP
IRON OXIDE, RED
ETHYL ALCOHOL
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2-
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
MICA
CADMIUM
COBALT
FLUORSPAR
NICKEL
SELENIUM
STANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
STANMOUS OXIDE
MERCURY OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
DIPHENYLAMINE
CHLOROPRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
•MANGANESE
QUARTZ
ZIRCONIUM
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
THALLIUM OXIDES
CYCLOHEXANONE
CEMENT-PORTLAND
IRON OXIDES
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
PEHTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2
ALUMINUM OXIDE
PHENOL
CRESOL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
178
251
559
153
153
211
147
147
197
134
134
134
134
134
174
174
174
117
107
107
350
104
104
134
134
134
307
86
86
86
258
106
106
104
225
218
65
64
62
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.051
.072
.161
.044
.044
.061
.042
.042
.057
.038
.038
.038
.038
.038
.050
.050
.050
.033
.030
.030
.101
.030
.030
.038
.038
.038
.088
.024
.024
.024
.074
.030
.030
.030
.065
.063
.018
.018
.017
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
03
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
03
10
10
07
07
07
03
10
10
10
03
07
07
07
03
03
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.515
.508
.485
.442
.442
.427
.425
.425
.399
.387
.387
.387
.387
.387
.352
.352
.352
.338
.309
.309
.303
.300
.300
.271
.271
.271
.266
.248
.248
.248
.223
.214
.214
.210
.195
. 189
. 188
. 185
.179
235 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1730
OTHER TOTALS-
37.998
10.865
66.724
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1740 MASONRY, STONEWORK, AND PLASTERING
DESCRIPTION
-—NOHS SURVEYED—
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.663 41
IHFOM
CODE
0577
9050
9210
C9020
0290
9010
9090
2037
9030
0527
2590
1430
., 0686
•7 2090
M 1591
" 1018
•° 1536
1290
2040
0933
1520
0867
1170
2460
1340
0374
1591
0686
0630
0522
9050
2000
1779
2360
2370
9010
0360
0490
1591
1631
1842.
NOHS
CODE
17695
84055
94220
90310
90320
67915
17366
M2829
71055
80243
76720
38580
80064
81650
81000
M0347
40430
336-40
55460
81006
40297
24003
46935
73300
90680
80517
42490
1939S
90510
15800
M1532
M0600
48535
71640
71860
M1806
11855
15630
426B5
45315
50495
CEMENT-PORTLAND
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
WOODS
ASBESTOS
ASPHALT
SAND
GRAPHITE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
TALC
CARBON
XYLENE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
LEAD SUBOXIDE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2-
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
FORMALDEHYDE
PHENOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
IRON OXIDES
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
TOLUENE
GASOLINE-LEADED
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD
CHROMIUM
CHLORODIPHENYLS
CAMPHOR
SILICA GEL
PARAFFIN
MICA
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
SILICA FLOUR
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
962
746
518
517
508
628
555
325
276
181
196
194
133
133
126
125
125
117
113
370
155
105
342
146
92
117
81
80
80
113
104
66
94
92
92
85
59
59
59
59
59
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.578
.448
.311
.310
.305
.377
,333
.195
.165
.108
.117
.116
.079
.079
.075
.075
.075
.070
.067
.222
.093
.063
.205
.087
.055
.070
.048
.048
.048
.067
.062
.039
.056
.055
.055
.051
.035
.035
.035
.035
.035
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
10
03
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
WEIGHT
INDEX
4.04
3.14
3.11
3.10
3.05
2.64
2.33
1.95
1.16
1.08
.82
.81
.79
.79
.75
.75
.75
.70
.67
.66
.65
.63
.61
.611
.5!
.4*
.41
.4;
.4;
.4i
.4^
. 1
/f'
. "-i
',
• ^
. I
a
* ul
• **
,3i
.3
.3
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
40 MASONRY. STONEWORK, AND PLASTERING
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.663 41
1
(-•
Ul
Ul
IHFOM
CODE
2080
2420
2127
2581
15*8
1367
1913
2229
0515
C0260
0686
1591
2570
0560
1620
0570
2537
1230
0530
5010
0680
C2580
1626
0170
0505
1050
1774
0527
0686
0686
0686
0490
0490
1750
2612
0490
2532
1593
2610
NOHS
CODE
57740
72085
M4257
83011
41775
90980
32385
M1463
15743
07555
81876
84546
A1010
17460
44035
17490
A1003
32940
15755
52131
18260
76445
MOB41
05250
15705
31490
47700
M0647
M0926
M1488
M2265
M2267
M2270
80105
82134
83628
82880
M1525
77190
1,1-
PHOSPHINE
THALLIUM OXIDES
PLASTER
DICHLOROETHYLENE,
KAOLIN
GYPSUM
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
IRON OXIDE, RED
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
ARSENIC OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD<2») SALT (1=1)
LEAD SULFATE
VANADIUM OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
MANGANESE OXIDES
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ETHYL SILICATE
CALCIUM OXIDE
OIL. CUTTING
CHLOROPRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
MARBLE
AMMONIA
CALCIUM CARBONATE
ETHYL ACRYLATE
METHYL METHACRYLATE
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
CHROME ORANGE
BARIUM CHROMATE
C.I. 77196-PIGMENT ORANGE 20
C.I. 77199-PIGMEHT ORANGE 20
METHYL ETHYL KETOHE PEROXIDE
C.I. 77955-PIGMENT YELLOW 36
CADMIUM SULFIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
LIMESTONE
ZINC OXIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
59
59
585
51
483
475
46
63
441
44
44
44
59
59
59
41
58
125
366
36
35
35
308
44
306
40
40
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
37
227
209
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.035
.035
.351
.030
.290
.285
.027
.037
.265
.026
.026
.026
.035
.035
.035
.024
.034
.075
.220
.021
.021
.021
.185
.026
.184
.024
.024
.016
.016
.016
.016
.016
.016
.016
.016
.016
.022
.136
. 125
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
01
10
01
01
10
07
01
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
03
01
10
10
10
01
07
01
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
01
01
UEIGHTED
INDEX
.354
.354
.351
.306
.290
.285
.276
.265
.265
.264
.264
.264
.248
.248
.248
.246
.244
.225
.220
.216
.210
.210
.185
.185
.184
.168
.168
.162
.162
.162
.162
.162
.162
. 162
. 162
. 162
. 155
. in
.125
203 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1740
OTHER TOTALS:
16,762
9.992
54.451
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1750 CARPENTERING AND FLOORING
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
580
20
IHFOM
CODE
9210
0290
0577
2037
1240
C9020
9050
2460
2000
2040
1591
2590
9010
0374
0522
0527
0686
0630
9090
1520
9030
1520
0760
1660
1631
06Hb
2090
0686
0686
1060
1720
1591
1591
1591
1591
C0260
1010
1591
9210
19S9
0230
NOHS
CODE
94220
90320
17695
M2829
33640
90310
84055
73300
M0600
55460
42490
76720
67915
80517
15800
80243
19395
90510
17366
40297
71055
70131
84266
45930
45315
80064
81650
81876
M0900
31500
46970
A1297
M0125
M0126
M0751
07545
25145
80252
M1327
54160
A143J
DESCRIPTION
MOODS
ASPHALT
CEMENT-PORTLAND
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
FORMALDEHYDE
ASBESTOS
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
TOLUENE
PARAFFIN
PHENOL
LEAD
XYLENE
SAND
SODIUM BORATE
CAMPHOR
CARBON
CHROMIUM
CHLORODIPHENYLS
GRAPHITE
IRON OXIDES
TALC
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
CRESOL. PARA-
METHANOL
MERCURY OXIDES
PUlikSSIJM DICiiRGNATEtVi:
PHOSPHORUS
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZIHC SALT (1U)
ETHYL ALCOHOL
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1-
LEAD CARBONATE. BASIC
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIOE
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
ARSENIC
DIOXANE. 1.4-
LEAD CARBONATE
HOOD FIBER
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
AHT1MOHY SULFIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
345
153
216
118
94
93
119
116
72
67
61
84
75
71
67
45
44
44
57
48
46
44
27
35
23
21
21
21
20
66
28
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
18
25
17
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.594
.263
.372
.203
.162
.160
.205
.200
.124
.115
.105
.144
.129
.122
.115
.077
.075
.075
.098
.082
.079
.075
.046
.060
.039
.036
.036
.036
.034
.113
.048
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.031
.043
.029
HAZARD
UEIGHT
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
5.948
2.637
2.606
2.034
1.620
1.603
1.436
1.400
1.241
1.155
1.051
1.013
.905
.856
.808
.775
.758
.758
.687
.579
.555
.531
.465
.422
.396
.362
.362
.362
.344
.341
.337
.327
.327
.327
.327
.327
.327
.327
.310
.301
.293
-------
ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
750 CARPENTERING AND FLOORING
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NONS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
580
20
IHFOM
CODE
0230
0933
1340
2310
2532
1170
2229
2620
2360
2370
1430
1913
1568
0040
0505
0430
1650
0160
1560
1380
2490
2540
2170
2037
C0320
0540
0570
0760
0867
0874"
0440
2610
1367
1626
0310
0310
1385
1591
0360
NOHS
CODE
07310
81806
90880
70870
82880
46935
M1463
M0626
71640
71860
38580
32385
41775
02820
15705
13980
46410
20265
40967
36955
73790
74990
M0256
M0630
09070
17370
17490
20380
24003
24130
14380
77190
90980
M0341
80341
83238
37510
M1693
11855
DESCRIPTION
ANTIMONY
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
GASOLINE-LEADED
SULFURIC ACID
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
IRON OXIDE. RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
KAOLIN
ACETONE
CALCIUM CARBONATE
BUTANONE. 2-
METHYL ACETATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
HEXANE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
TURPENTINE
PROPANOL, 1-
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CRESOL
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
BUTYl ACETATE
ZIHC OXIDE
GYPSUM
MARBLE
BARIUM OXIDE
BARIUM PEROXIDE
METHYL-2-PENTANONE. 4-
LEAD SOAP
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
17
55
16
22
22
51
18
17
17
17
15
10
94
93
90
74
72
23
67
65
9
9
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
49
46
45
44
44
44
41
4
4
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.029
.094
.027
.037
.037
.087
.031
.029
.029
.029
.025
.017
.162
.160
.155
.127
.124
.039
.115
.112
.015
.015
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.008
.084
.079
.077
.075
.075
.075
.070
.006
.006
HAZARD
UEIGHT
10
03
10
07
07
03
07
07
07
07
07
10
01
01
01
01
01
03
01
01
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
10
10
.293
.284
.275
.265
.265
.263
.217
.205
.205
.205
.181
.172
.162
.160
.155
.127
.124
.118
.115
.112
.108
.108
.086
.086
.086
.086
.086
.086
.086'
.086
.084
.079
.077
.075
.075
.075
.070
.068
.068
150 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1750
OTHER TOTALS:
4,359
7.429
45.185
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1760 ROOFING AND SHEET METAL WORK
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED IHDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2.259 56
IHFOM
CODE
0290
2037
C9020
2460
2590
0290
0760
C0320
1810
2040
0170
0700
1591
9050
1340
1631
0490
1842
0686
0360
2080
2420
2360
2370
9210
1520
0686
C0260
2090
1591
2537
2229
2570
0560
1620
1591
1591
1.591
2611
0230
0230
NOHS
CODE
90320
M2829
90310
73300
76720
80636
20380
09070
49600
' 55460
05250
90620
42685
84055
90880
45315
15630
50495
81876
11855
57740
72085
71640
71860
94220
40297
80064
07555
81650
84546
A1003
M1463
A1010
17460
44035
M0125
M0126
42490
77150
07310
A141J
DESCRIPTION
ASPHALT
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ASBESTOS
TOLUENE
XYLENE
ASPHALT VOLATILES
CRESOL
BENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
PHENOL
AMMONIA
COAL TAR PITCH VOLATILES
LEAD OXIDES
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
GASOLINE-LEADED
MERCURY OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD<2O SALT (1 = 1)
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
THALLIUM OXIDES
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
WOODS
IRON OXIDES
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI3
ARSEHIC OXIDES
PHOSPHORUS
LEAD SULFATE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
IRON OXIDE. RED
VANADIUM OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
MANGANESE OXIDES
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD
ZINC CHLORIDE
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.920
1.075
1.074
966
945
630
587
578
574
574
613
391
320
416
279
265
247
247
227
225
225
225
316
316
220
302
210
183
183
183
229
227
225
225
225
157
157
151
ua
124
122
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.849
.475
.475
.427
.418
.278
.259
.255
.254
.254
.271
.173
.141
.184
.123
.117
.109
.109
.100
.099
.099
.099
.139
.139
.097
.133
.092
.081
.081
.081
.101
.100
.099
.099
.099
.069
.069
.066
.061
.054
.054
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
8.499
4.758
4.754
2.993
2.928
2.788
2.598
2.558
2.540
2.540
1.899
1.730
1.416
1.289
1.235
1.173
1.093
1.093
1.004
.996
.996
.996
.979
.979
.973
.935
.929
.810
.810
.810
.709
.703
.697
.697
.697
.694
.694
.668
.610
.548
.540
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1760
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
ROOFING AND SHEET METAL UORK
DESCRIPTION
2,259
56
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1591
1591
1430
9090
1300
1018
1536
9085
0577
2620
9210
0933
> 2432
I 2432
M 2432
^ 0527
1591
5010
9030
1842
2490
1790
0374
2220
9010
0160
0686
0636
1591
1340
1591
9010
C0260
2610
2000
1591
1591
0680
NOHS
CODE
81000
81677
84544
38580
17366
33245
M0347
404 iO
68768
17695
M0626
M1327
81806
M0877
73253
82157
80243
M0751
52138
71055
84269
73790
48628
80517
65080
M1806
20265
M0063
M0900
83453
90885
91160
67915
07545
77190
M0600
A1297
80252
18260
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
GRAPHITE
FIBERGLASS
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2-
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
SOAPSTOHE
CEMENT-PORTLAND
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
WOOD FIBER
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
STANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
STANNOUS OXIDE
CARBON
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
OIL, LUBE
TALC
NICKEL OXIDE
ETHVLENE. TRICHLORO-
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
SODIUM BORATE
PYRIDINE
SILICA FLOUR
ALUMINUM OXIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
GASOLINE-UNLEADED
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
SAND
ARSENIC
ZIIIC OXIDE
PARAFFIN
LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC
LEAD CARBONATE
CHLOROPRENE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
117
117
117
157
153
145
99
99
133
132
122
84
278
117
117
117
80
77
77
106
71
100
225
86
574
74
169
50
49
49
48
48
68
42
417
41
40
40
39
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.051
.051
.051
.069
.067
.064
.043
.043
.058
.058
.054
.037
.123
.051
.051
.051
.035
.034
.034
.046
.031
.044
.099
.038
.254
.032
.074
.022
.021
.021
.021
.021
.030
.018
.184
.018
.017
.017
.017
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
03
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
07
03
07
01
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
01
10
10
10
10
UEIGHTED
INDEX
.517
.517
.517
.486
.474
.449
.438
.438
.412
.409
.378
.371
.369
.362
.362
.362
.354
.340
.340
.328
.314
.309
.298
.266
.254
.229
.224
.221
.216
.216
.212
.212
.210
.185
.184
. 181
.177
.177
.172
226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1760
OTHER TOTALS:
28,585
12.530
85.231
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NQHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
MISC. SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2,358
45
IHFOM
CODE
1591
0490
1842
0360
1631
2420
9050
2080
1520
2037
9210
2537
2570
> 1620
1 0560
»-• 2532
m 2590
0290
2460
5010
C9020
1591
1591
0230
2490
0230
1790
2611
0527
1913
2229
9090
2620
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2020
5010
9030
NOHS
CODE
42685
15630
50495
11855
45315
720S5
84055
57740
40297
M2829
94220
A1003
A1010
44035
17460
82880
76720
90320
73300
52138
90310
42490
83453
07310
73790
A1433
48628
77150
80243
32385
M1463
17366
M0626
M0125
M0126
81000
8U77
84544
54790
52131
71055
LEAD OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
PHOSPHINE
IRON OXIDES
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
MOODS
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
CAROOU MONOXIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
XYLENE
ASPHALT
TOLUENE
OIL. LUBE
ASBESTOS
LEAD
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
ANTIMONY
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
ZINC CHLORIDE
CARBON
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
IRON OXIDE. RED
GRAPHITE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
TEfRACHLOROETHYLEHE
OIL. CUTTING
TALC
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
640
626
626
587
587
587
836
582
688
455
441
625
587
587
582
477
463
278
388
248
246
220
207
199
264
182
587
175
175
152
214
204
199
122
122
105
105
105
142
90
126
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.271
.265
.265
.248
.248
.248
.354
.246
.291
.192
.187
.265
.248
.248
.246
.202
.196
.117
.164
.105
.104
.093
.087
.084
.111
.077
.248
.074
.074
.064
.090
.086
.084
.051
.051
.044
.044
.044
.060
.038
.053
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10.
03
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
2.714
2.654
2.654
2.489
2.489
2.489
2.481
2.468
2.042
.929
.870
.855
.742
.742
.727
.416
.374
.178
.151
.051
.043
.932
.877
.843
.783
.771
.746
.742
.742
.644
.635
.605
.590
.517
.517
.445
.445
.445
.421
.381
.374
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
MISC. SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2.358
45
IHFOM
CODE
1660
2432
0160
2432
2432
0686
0680
C2580
1591
0374
0926
2000
0640
> 0730
I 0577
J-* 2440
Ł 0530
2587
1980
1280
2360
2370
1430
1060
0686
2090
1018
1536
1340
1591
0686
0630
9010
0933
OJ10
0505
1100
1720
1790
NOHS
CODE
45930
73253
20265
M0877
82157
M0063
18260
76445
91160
80517
27615
M0600
18040
20170
17695
A1211
17367
76618
81651
81945
71640
71860
38580
31500
80064
81650
M0347
40430
90880
M1693
19395
90510
67915
81806
M2929
15705
33245
46970
80056
METHANOL
TIN OXIDES
ALUMINUM OXIDE
STANNIC OXIDE
STAHKOUS OXIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
CHLOROPRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
SODIUM BORATE
DIPHENYLAMINE
PARAFFIN
CHLORINE
COPPER OXIDES
CEMENT-PORTLAND
TITAIIIUM. OXIDES OF
CARBON DIOXIDE
MELDING RODS
OZOHE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2-
ISOBUTfL ALCOHOL
GASOLINE-LEADED
LEAD SOAP
CHROMIUM
CHLOROD1PHENYLS
SAND
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
CALCIUM CARBONATE
FIBFRGLASS
TrMCHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1-
HOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
122
122
248
105
105
66
64
64
64
88
201
60
85
591
84
587
585
587
582
55
67
67
64
144
43
43
42
42
42
38
38
38
46
107
298
298
42
40
90
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.051
.051
.105
.044
.044
.027
.027
.027
.027
.037
.085
.025
.036
.250
.035
.248
.248
.248
.246
.023
.028
.028
.027
.061
.018
.018
.017
.017
.017
.016
.016
.016
.019
.045
.126
.126
.017
.016
.038
HAZARD
HEIGHT
07
07
03
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
07
01
07
01
01
01
01
10
07
07
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
03
01
01
07
07
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.362
.362
.315
.311
.311
.279
.271
.271
.271
.261
.255
.254
.252
.250
.249
.248
.248
.248
.246
.233
.198
.198
.189
.183
.182
.182
.178
.178
.178
.161
.161
.161
.136
.136
.126
. 126
. 124
. 118
. 114
225 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1790
OTHER TOTALS:
25.271
10.611
66.415
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
!OB6 BOTTLED AND CANNED SOFT DRINKS
DESCRIPTION
--- NOHS SURVEYED ---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
16
IHFOM
CODE
9090
0290
1060
9210
2037
2590
1340
2000
2460
1591
2360
2370
9050
> 2490
' 2532
Ł 5010
o 0686
0933
1170
0374
1913
1790
2611
0686
0867
1591
1591
1520
2540
0490
1842
2080
C9020
9030
0230
0230
2229
1720
0170
0360
1591
NOHS
CODE
17366
90320
31500
94220
M2829
76720
90880
M0600.
73300
M1693
71640
71860
84055
73790
82880
52138
81876
81806
46935
80517
32385
80056
77150
M0063
24003
42490
91160
40297
74990
15630
50495
57740
90310
71055
A1433
07310
M1463
46970
05250
11855
42685
GRAPHITE
ASPHALT
ETHYL ALCOHOL
MOODS
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
XYLENE
GASOLINE-LEADED
PARAFFIN
TOLUENE
LEAD SOAP
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
OIL. LUBE
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT mi)
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
SODIUM BORATE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
ZINC CHLORIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
LEAD
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
IRON OXIDES
TURPENTINE
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
ASBESTOS
TALC
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
IRON OXIDE, RED
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1-
AnrtONIA
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
272
183
545
153
150
190
132
107
147
101
132
132
125
123
116
71
71
154
151
58
40
123
33
30
30
30
30
40
35
24
24
24
24
34
22
22
30
29
27
19
19
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.191
.128
.384
.107
.105
.133
.093
.075
.103
.071
.093
.093
.088
.086
.081
.050
.050
.108
.106
.040
.028
.086
.023
.021
.021
.021
.021
.028
.024
.016
.016
.016
.016
.023
.015
.015
.021
.020
.019
.013
.013
HAZARD
HEIGHT
07
10
03
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
03
03
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
47
07
07
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
1.341
1.289
1.152
1.078
1.057
.937
.930
.754
.725
.711
.651
.651
.616
.606
.572
.500
.500
.325
.319
.286
.281
.260
.232
.211
.211
.211
.211
.197
.172
.169
.169
.169
.169
.167
.155
.155
.147
.143
.133
.133
.133
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
sic INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
2006 BOTTLED AND CANNED SOFT DRINKS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,419
16
IHFOM
CODE
1631
2420
1591
2537
0560
0760
1290
1591
2620
1568
C0260
0310
0530
j* 0527
I 2570
- 0810
^ 1371
1380
1620
1740
1957
1989
2040
1060
2260
0020
2310
0874
0430
1389
0522
1660
0160
0570
1520
15?0
1520
9050
1A60
NOHS
CODE
45315
72085
83453
A1003
17460
20380
33640
84546
M0626
41775
07555
M2929
17367
80243
A1010
21190
36060
36955
44035
47030
51705
54160
. 55460
M0238
69070
01568
70870
24130
13980
37510
15800
45930
20265
17490
M0130
70131
80990
M1532
50742
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
CRESOL
FORMALDEHYDE
LEAD SULFATE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
KAOLIN
ARSENIC OXIDES
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON
VANADIUM OXIDES
CYCLOHEXANE
HEPTANE
HEXANE
MANGANESE OXIDES
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
OCTANE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PKE»!OL
ALCOHOL
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
ACETIC ACID
SULFURIC ACID
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
BUTANONF. 2~
METHYL-2-PENTANONE, 4-
CAMPHOR
METHANOL
ALUMIIIUM OXIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
FERROUS OXIDE
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
SILICA GEL
NITRIC ACID
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
19
19
18
24
24
16
16
16
22
151
15
145
142
14
19
132
132
132
19
132
132
19
13
42
115
16
16
11
103
98
13
13
28
a
11
11
11
10
7
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.013
.013
.012
.016
.016
.011
.011
.011
.015
.106
.010
.102
.100
.009
.013
.093
.093
.093
.013
.093
.093
.013
.009
.029
.081
.011
.011
.007
.072
.069
.009
.009
.019
.005
.007
.007
.007
.007
. 004
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
01
10
01
01
10
07
01
01
01
07
01
01
07
10
03
01
07
07
10
01
01
07
07
03
10
07
07
07
07
10
.133
.133
.126
.118
.118
.112
.112
.112
.108
.106
.105
.102
.100
.098
.093
.093
.093
.093
.093
.093
.093
.093
.091
.088
.081
.078
.078
.077
.072
.069
.064
.064
.059
.056
.054
.054
.054
. 049
.049
218 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2086
OTHER TOTALS:
6,913
4.775
24.433
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
2434 MOOD KITCHEN CABINETS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—NOHS SURVEYED—
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.637
17
IHFOM
CODE
9210
2460
2590
2037
2040
2532
1290
C0320
0374
0522
1860
1018
0680
1060
2000
9210
1591
0230
0230
0290
1660
9050
1536
0527
2229
C2580
2620
1060
0160
C9020
2611
1560
0460
0040
0440
0874
1040
1540
0760
5010
1720
NOHS
CODE '•
94220
73300
76720
M2C29
55460
82880
33640
09070
80517
15800
50742
M0347
18260
31500
M0600
M1327
•42490
A1433
07310
90320
45930
84055
40430
80243
M1465
76445
M0626
M0238
20265
90310
77150
40987
13850
02820
14380
24130
31470
40984
20380
52138
46970
DESCRIPTION
MOODS
TOLUENE
XYLENE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
PHENOL
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
FORMALDEHYDE
BENZENE
SODIUM BORATE
CAMPHOR
NITRIC ACID
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
CHLOROPRENE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
PARAFFIN
WOOD FIBER
LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
ASPHALT
METHANOL
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
CARBON
IRON OXIDE, RED
VINYL CHLORIDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
ALCOHOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ASBESTOS
ZINC CHLORIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
BUTANOL
ACETONE
BUTYL ACETATE
DICHLOROETHANE. 1,2-
ETHYL ACETATE
ISOPROPYL ACETATE
CRESOL
OIL. LUBE
TR1CHLOROETHAHE, 1,1.1-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1,646
1,709
1,357
678
626
874
592
441
621
577
378
326
318
1.024
305
279
264
257
257
254
327
326
205
199
272
132
257
427
422
124
123
,219
,213
.196
,084
104
.036
,017
97
85
116
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1.005
1.043
.828
.414
.382
.533
.361
.269
.379
.352
.230
.199
.194
.625
.186
.170
.161
.156
.156
.155
.199
.199
.125
.121
.166
.111
.156
.260
.257
.075
.075
.744
.740
.730
.662
.063
.632
.621
,059
.051
.070
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 10.054
07 7.307
07 5.802
10 4.141
10 3.824
07 3.737
10 3.616
10 2.693
07 2.655
07 2.467
10 2.309
10
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
07
.991
.942
.876
.863
.704
.612
.569
.569
.551
.398
.394
.252
.215
.163
.111
.098
03 .782
03 .773
10 .757
10 .751
01 .744
01 .740
01 .730
01 .662
10 .635
01 .632
01 .621
10 .592
10 .519
07 .496
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
MOOD KITCHEN CABINETS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OTFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
UITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,637
17
IHFOM
CODE
0720
1842
1989
1430
1650
2490
2310
1610
2570
1620
2223
1010
1941
9090
0686
C0260
1591
2037
0430
1380
1591
0570
0867
2135
2170
0735
0540
0686
2090
9050
1520
2020
2540
0860
1105
90)0
15)4
0220
1280
NOHS
CODE
19770
50420
54160
38580
46410
73790
7C870
80298
M1727
44030
67405
25145
51090
17356
81876
07555
84546
M0630
13980
36955
83453
17490
24003
80221
M0256
94040
17370
80064
81650
M1532
40297
54790
74990
M4016
37510
71055
40410
06580
86
205 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 24)4
OTHER TOTALS:
30,944
18.79)
98.48)
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
UOOD PARTITIONS AND FIXTURES
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—-NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
838
12
IHFOM
CODE
9210
2460
0230
0230
1591
2037
9050
2590
2229
2620
0290
C0320
2000
2540
2532
1290
2037
2490
9090
2040
9210
0874
0160
2540
0570
0867
2170
0540
0760
0686
1660
2080
1060
C0260
1842
1591
1720
0374
0522
1520
1660
NOHS
CODE
94220
73300
07310
A1433
42490
M2829
84055
76720
M1463
M0626
90320
09070
M0600
74990
82880
33640
M0630
73790
17366
55460
M1327
24130
20265
M1322
17490
24003
M0256
17370
20380
81876
45930
57740
31500
07555
84269
84546
46970
80517
15800
40297
50742
DESCRIPTION
WOODS
TOLUENE
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
LEAD
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
XYLENE
IRON OXIDE, RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
ASPHALT
BENZENE
PARAFFIN
TURPENTINE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
FORMALDEHYDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
GRAPHITE
PHENOL
WOOD FIBER
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TURPENTINE (GUM)
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
PROP AHOL. 1-
CARBON DISULFIDE
CRESOL
CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
METHAHOL
PHOSPHINE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ARSENIC OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDE
LEAD SULTATE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1,1-
SODIUI1 DORATE
CAMPHOR
IRON OXIDES
NITRIC ACID
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
571
374
211
209
209
208
278
276
224
212
148
128
103
147
144
98
96
128
127
87
86
86
284
120
84
83
82
82
82
81
113
79
262
76
76
76
102
99
92
90
61
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.681
.446
.251
.249
.249
.248
.331
.329
.267
.252
.176
.152
.122
.175
.171
.116
.114
.152
.151
.103
.102
.102
.338
.143
.100
.099
.097
.097
.097
.096
.134
.094
.312
.090
.090
.090
.121
.118
.109
.107
.072
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
03
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
03
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
6.813
3.124
2.517
2.494
2.494
2.482
2.322
2.305
1.871
1.770
1.766
.527
.229
.227
.202
.169
.145
.069
.060
.038
.026
.026
.016
1.002
1.002
.990
.978
.978
.978
.966
.943
.942
.937
.906
.906
.906
.852
.826
.768
.751
.727
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
WOOD PARTITIONS AND FIXTURES
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETT AND HEALIH ADfll N 1 5 I R A t I ON
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
838
12
IHFOH
CODE
2020
0220
0560
1060
0040
2611
C9020
0527
0720
1536
1842
1018
1560
0820
0860
0924
0440
1030
5010
0460
1430
1970
0620
0830
2190
0933
1540
1040
2232
0430
1631
0170
2310
2570
0680
1913
1620
2223
C2580
NOHS
CODE
54790
06580
17460
M0238
02820
77150
90310
80243
19770
40430
50420
M0347
40987
21560
MAO 16
25820
14380
04980
52138
13850
38580
52480
18190
21660
24390
81806
40984
31470
M1720
13980
45315
05250
70870
M1727
18260
32385
44030
67405
76445
DESCRIPTION
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ANILINE
CARBON MONOXIDE
ALCOHOL
ACETONE
ZINC CHLORIDE
ASBESTOS
CARBOH
COBALT
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
NICKEL
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
CYCLOHEXANOL
PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-HETHYL-, 2-
DIMETHfL-4-HEPTANONE, 2,6-
BUTYL ACETATE
ETHANOLAMINE
OIL. LUBE
BUfANOL
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
OXALIC ACID
CHLOROBENZENE
CYCLOHEXANONE
D1CHLOROPROPANE. 1,2-
UlcTri'iL ?i!T!IAi.ATC
ISOPROPYl ACETATE
ETHYL ACETATE
RUBBER SOLVENT
BUTAMONE, 2-
MERCURY OXIDES
AMMONIA
SULFURIC ACID
VANADIUM OXIDE
CHLOROPREUE
ETHYLEIIE GLYCOL
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
RHODIUM
VINYL CHLORIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
86
82
82
161
343
34
34
33
32
32
32
30
299
96
94
94
281
91
27
266
37
25
82
82
82
82
242
33
224
22
31
31
30
21
21
30
30
21
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.102
.097
.097
.192
.409
.040
.040
.039
.038
.038
.038
.035
.356
.114
.112
.112
.335
.108
.032
.317
.044
.029
.097
.097
.097
.097
.288
.260
.039
.267
.026
.036
.036
.035
.025
.025
.035
.035
.025
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
07
03
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
03
03
03
01
03
10
01
07
10
03
03
03
03
01
01
07
01
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.718
.684
.684
.576
.409
.405
.405
.393
.381
.381
.381
.357
.356
.343
.336
.336
.335
.325
.322
.317
.309
.298
.293
.293
.293
.293
.288
.280
.275
.267
.262
.258
.258
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
217 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2541
OTHER TOTALS'-
12.890
15.270
82.818
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
2751 COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LETTERPRESS
DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMEHT FIRMS
3,665 38
IHFOM
CODE
2037
0290
2170
1913
2460
C0320
0874
0570
2590
0527
0760
1720
1620
0540
0867
2037
2490
1060
1660
0686
2540
2020
1591
1591
0686
0220
1591
C0260
0686
0686
9030
0374
1591
1591
1591
1591
0170
5010
9050
0230
0527
NOHS
CODE,
M2829
90320
M0256
32385
73300
09070
24130
17490
76720
80243
20380
46970
M0921
17370
24003
M0630
73790
31500
45930
M0926
74990
54790
M0125
M0126
81876
06580
84546
07555
M1488
M1499
71055
80517
42685
81000
81677
84544
05250
52138
A4055
07310
M0647
1.1.1-
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ASPHALT
PROPANOL, 1-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
TOLUENE
BENZENE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
XYLENE
CARBON
CRESOL
TRICHLOROETHANE,
MANGANESE DRIER
CARBON DISULFIDE
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
NAPHTHA -SOL VENT
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
ETHYL ALCOHOL
METHANOL
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
TURPENTINE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
CHROfllC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT (1:1)
ANILINE
LEAD SULFATE
ARSENIC OXIDES
CHROME ORANGE
CHROME GREEN
TALC
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD OXIDES
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
AMMONIA
OIL. LUBE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
ANTIMONY
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1,894
1,309
1.280
1,202
1,686
892
789
783
1,077
724
694
990
841
565
565
564
754
1,739
680
471
645
640
445
445
414
566
394
392
385
375
480
438
305
290
290
290
394
271
357
245
234
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.516
.357
.349
.327
.460
.243
.215
.213
.293
.197
.189
.270
.229
.154
.154
.153
.205
.474
.185
.128
.175
.174
.121
.121
.112
.154
.107
.106
.105
.102
.130
.119
.083
.079
.079
.079
.107
.073
.097
.066
.063
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 5.167
10 3.571
10 3.492
10 3.279
07 3.220
10 2.433
10 2.152
10 2.136
07 2.057
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
03
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
.975
.893
.890
.606
.541
.541
.538
.440
.423
.298
.285
.231
.222
.214
.214
.129
.081
.075
.069
.050
.023
07 .916
07 .836
10 .832
10 .791
10 .791
10 .791
07 .752
10 .739
07 .681
10 .668
10 .638
-------
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LETTERPRESS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3,665
38
INFOM
CODE
0020
0860
0230
0230
0230
0830
0820
1591
0720
1860
1018
9090
2310
_ 1030
•f C9020
H. 1536
*» 1591
-J 0620
2190
0924
1941
2432
2432
2432
0490
1280
1842
2230
2000
0430
1010
1540
1430
1560
1620
0720
9010
2620
1060
NOHS
CODE
01568
M4016
A1640
A1641
07328
21660
21560
83453
19770
50742
M0347
17366
70870
04980
90310
40430
42490
18190
24390
25820
51090
M0877
73253
82157
15570
33595
50420
68295
M0600
13980
25145
40984
38580
40987
44000
80347
66495
77265
M0238
ACETIC ACID
PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-. 2-
AHTIMOHY OXIDE SB205
ANTIMONY OXIDE (SB204)
ANTIMONY OXIDES
CYCLOHEXAHOME
CYCLOHEXANOL
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
COBALT
NITRIC ACID
EIHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2-
GRAPHITE
SULFUR1C ACID
ETHANOLAMINE
ASBESTOS
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
LEAD
CHLOROBENZENE
DICHLOROPROPANE, 1.2-
DIMETHYL-4-HEPTAHONE, 2,6-
HITROPROPANE, 2-
SIANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
STANNOUS OXIDE
CADMIUM
FLUORSPAR
NICKEL
SELENIUM
PARAFFIN
BUTAHONE. 2-
DIOXANE. 1.4-
ISOPROPYL ACETATE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
MANGANESE
COBALT NAPHTHENATE
QUARTZ
ZIRCONIUM
ALCOHOL
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
313
703
208
208
208
671
661
196
187
187
184
258
256
591
177
176
171
564
564
564
162
225
225
225
155
155
155
155
154
1,504
149
1,385
197
1,224
160
111
155
155
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.085
.191
.056
.056
.056
.183
.180
.053
.051
.051
.050
.070
.069
.161
.048
.048
.046
.153
.153
.153
.044
.061
.061
.061
.042
.042
.042
.042
.042
.410
.040
.377
.053
.333
.043
.030
.042
.042
.093
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
03
10
10
10
03
03
10
10
10
10
07
07
03
10
10
10
03
03
03
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
01
10
01
07
01
07
10
07
07
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.597
.575
.567
.567
.567
.549
.541
.534
.510
.510
.502
.492
.488
.483
.482
.480
.466
.461
.461
.461
.442
.429
.429
.429
.422
.422
.422
.422
.420
.410
.406
.377
.376
.333
.305
.302
.296
.296
.279
260 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2751
OTHER TOTALS:
62,976
17.071
93. 378
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2752 COMMERCIAL PRINTING. LITHOGRAPHIC
DESCRIPTION
1,270
26
00
IHFOM
CODE
2037
0290
2460
2170
1913
C0320
,2590
1720
0874
1620
0760
5010
0570
2490
0527
9090
0867
C9020
0527
1060
0540
1660
1591
0374
2037
2020
1860
1018
•1536
9030
0020
2540
2000
1290
2310
2532
0220
1970
1010
9210
1941
NOHS
CODE
M2829
90320
73300
M0256
32385
09070
76720
46970
24130
M0921
20380
52138
17490
73790
80243.
17366
24003
90310
M0647
31500
17370
45930
83453
80517
M0630
54790
50742
M0347
40430
71055
01568
74990
M0600
33640
70870
82880
06580
52480
25145
94220
51090
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ASPHALT
TOLUEHE
PROPAHOL, 1-
ETHYLEIIE GLYCOL
BENZENE
XYLENE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1-
DICHLOROETHAHE. 1,2-
MANGANESE DRIER
CRESOL
OIL, LUBE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
CAROON
GRAPHITE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
ASBESTOS
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
ETHYL ALCOHOL
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHANOL
LEAD HAPHTHENATE
SODIUM BORATE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NITRIC ACID
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BISC2-
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
TALC
ACETIC ACID
TURPEHTINE
PARAFFIN
FORMALDEHYDE
SULFURIC ACID
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
ANILINE
OXALIC ACID
DIOXAME. 1.4-
UOODS
MI1ROPROPANE. 2-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
623
460
630
411
384
348
403
402
276
346
205
203
196
260
176
251
175
169
158
514
152
215
149
209
145
196
136
128
126
180
178
176
123
118
167
158
151
102
97
96
92
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.490
.362
.496
.323
.302
.274
.317
.316
.217
.272
.161
.159
.154
.204
.138
.197
.137
.133
.124
.404
.119
.169
.117
.164
.114
.154
.107
.100
.099
.141
.140
.138
.096
.092
.131
.124
.118
.080
.076
.075
.072
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 4.905
10 3.622
07 3.472
10 3.236
10 3.023
10 2.740
07 2.221
07 2.215
10 2.173
07
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
03
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
.907
.614
.598
.543
.433
.385
.383
.377
.330
.244
.214
.196
.185
.173
.151
.141
.080
.070
.007
10 .992
07 .992
07 .981
07 .970
10 .968
10 .929
07 .920
07 .870
07 .832
10 .803
10 .763
10 .755
10 .724
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFtIT MHU nt.ni.in Muninia•K»i•un
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LITHOGRAPHIC
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.270 26
IHFOM
CODE
9050
0860
0686
0720
1591
1430
1560
0690
1340
2611
0720
2042
1842
2080
? 2505
M 1060
.u 1631
^ 1591
0830
0170
0720
1591
1591
0686
0430
0686
1591
0560
0686
0820
1591
2683
1620
1030
1810
1540
0620
2190
0924
NOHS
CODE
84055
M4016
80064
81777
M1693
38580
40987
82232
90885
77150
80347
56950
50420
57740
74405
M0238
84274
84473
21660
05250
19770
M0125
M0126
81876
13980
M0063
91160
17460
M0926
21560
42490
82226
60490
04980
49600
40984
18190
24390
25820
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CODALTOUS ACETATE
LEAD SOAP
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
CHROMIC POTASSIUM SULFATE
GASOLIHE-UNLEADED
ZINC CHLORIDE
COBALT NAPHTHENATE
PHENYLENEDIAMINE, PARA-
NICKEL
PHOSPHINE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
ALCOHOL
MERCURIC CHLORIDE
LEAD NITRATE
CYCLOHEXANONE
AMMONIA
COBALT
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT (1:1)
BUTANONE, 2-
INORGAMIC CHROMATES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
CARBON MONOXIDE
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
CYCLOHEXANOL
LEAD
BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENES
POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE
ETHAMOLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE
ISOPROPYL ACETATE
CHIOROBENZENE
DlCHlORaPROPAHE, 1.2-
DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
129
254
76
76
74
104
725
68
68
66
65
91
62
62
62
204
58
58
187
79
55
54
54
54
515
51
51
72
48
160
47
67
65
151
44
436
145
145
145
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.101
.200
.059
.059
.058
.081
.570
.053
.053
.051
.051
.071
.048
.048
.048
.160
.045
.045
.147
.062
.043
.042
.042
.042
.405
.040
.040
.056
.037
.125
.037
.052
.051
.118
.034
.343
.114
.114
.114
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
03
10
10
10
07
01
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
03
10
10
03
07
10
10
10
10
01
10
10
07
10
03
10
07
07
03
10
01
03
03
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.711
.600
.598
.598
.582
.573
.570
.535
.535
.519
.511
.501
.488
.488
.488
.481
.456
.456
.441
.435
.433
.425
.425
.425
.405
.401
.401
.396
.377
.377
.370
.369
.358
.356
.346
.343
.342
.342
.342
242 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2752
OTHER TOTALS:
24,050
18.812
97.450
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
2819
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—-NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS. NEC.
DESCRIPTION
2,268
10
H1
cn
O
IHFOM
CODE
C0320
2037
0170
9050
2590
0570
1*30
2460
1660
1591
5010
2310
2490
2611
9090
0874
1591
1860
0560
1842
0374
0760
2170
0490
0540
0360
1631
2420
2020
0867
C9020
0686
0670
2532
2080
5010
2090
2229
0527
0290
14SO
NOHS
CODE
09070
M2829
05250
84055
76720
17490
38580
73300
45930
42685
52131
70870
73790
77150
17366
24130
42490
50742
17460
50495
80517
20380
M0256
15630
17370
11855
45315
72085
54790
24003
90310
80064
18500
82880
57740
52138
81650
M1463
80243
90320
JB620
BENZENE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
AKKONIA
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
XYLENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
METHANOL
LEAD OXIDES
OIL, CUTTING
SULFURIC ACID
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
ZINC CHLORIDE
GRAPHITE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
LEAD
NITRIC ACID
CARBON MONOXIDE
NICKEL OXIDES
SODIUM BORATE
CRESOL
PROPANOL. 1-
CADMIUM OXIDES
CARBON DISULFIDE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
ASBESTOS
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CHLOROFORM
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
PHOSPHINE
OIL. LUBE
PHOSPHORUS
IRON OXIDE. RED
CARBON
ASPHALT
HYDROGEN SULFIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
396
383
546
411
406
277
393
383
358
217
205
273
268
187
248
173
172
172
240
168
240
162
160
160
155
153
153
153
208
143
143
141
140
200
138
135
134
189
131
128
179
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.174
.168
.240
.181
.179
.122
.173
.168
.157
.095
.090
.120
.118
.082
.109
.076
.075
.075
.105
.074
.105
.071
.070
.070
.068
.067
.067
.067
.091
.063
.063
.062
.061
.088
.060
.059
.059
.083
.057
.056
.078
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.746
.688
.685
.268
.253
.221
.212
.182
.104
.956
.903
.842
.827
.824
.765
.762
.758
.758
.740
.740
.740
.714
.705
.705
.683
.674
.674
.674
.641
.630
.630
.621
.617
.617
.608
.595
.590
.583
.577
.564
.552
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
2819 INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS, NEC.
DESCRIPTION
2,26ft
10
1
I-1
Ul
t—1
IHFOH
CODE
1290
2093
2037
0230
0230
1520
1060
2537
0020
2570
1620
0220
2040
1591
1720
2540
0686
2000
1591
1591
9210
1591
1591
9030
1913
0640
2620
1591
1460
1591
1591
1591
0390
2085
0160
1842
1790
1030
1018
NOHS
CODE
33640
59166
M0630
07310
A1433
40297
31500
A1003
0156A
A1010
44035
06580
55460
83453
46970
74990
M0063
M0600
91160
84544
94220
M0751
M1693
71055
32385
18040
M0626
M0126
38550
M0125
81000
81677
13100
58520
20265
84269
80056
04980
M0347
FORMALDEHYDE
PHOSPHORUS TRICHLORIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
IRON OXIDES
ETHYL ALCOHOL
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ACETIC ACID
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
ANILINE
PHENOL
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
TURPENTINE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
PARAFFIN
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
LEAD DIOXIDE
WOODS
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
LEAD SOAP
TALC
CTHVI rye r,| vmt
CHLORINE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
BROMINE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
ALUMINUM OXIDE
NICKEL OXIDE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
ETHANOLAMINE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
121
170
118
116
114
162
375
160
159
153
153
149
101
99
141
139
91
91
90
87
87
86
85
121
83
115
114
76
76
74
74
74
99
667
220
64
202
196
57
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.053
.074
.052
.051
.050
.071
.165
.070
.070
.067
.067
.065
.044
.043
.062
.061
.040
.040
.039
.038
.038
.037
.037
.053
.036
.050
.050
.033
.033
.032
.032
.051
.043
.294
.097
.028
.089
.086
.025
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
10
10
07
03
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
i o
07
01
03
10
03
03
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.533
.524
.520
.511
.502
.499
.496
.493
.490
.472
.472
.459
.445
.436
.435
.429
.401
.401
.396
.383
.383
.379
.374
.373
.365
.354
.351
.335
.335
.326
.326
.J<:6
.305
.294
.291
.282
.267
.259
.251
472 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2819
OTHER TOTALS:
27.931
12.072
68.746
-------
ur
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
AMU AHALI:>I:>
.1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
821 PLASTICS MATERIALS AND RESINS
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
-—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.341
12
IHFOM
CODE
C0320
2037
2460
0290
1913
2170
2590
2490
0760
1860
0570
0867
> 0540
I 2037
^ 0874
Ł 1660
1620
2020
1720
2540
0220
1018
5010
0527
1060
9050
1591
2532
9090
0860
1030
1060
0830
0924
C2580
0820
0620
2190
9210
9050
1591
NOHS
CODE
09070
M2829 ;
73300
90320
32385
M0256
76720
73790
20380
50742
17490
24003
17370
M0630
24130
45930
M0921
54790
46970
74990
06580
M0347
52138
80243
31500
84055
83453
82880
17366
M4016
04980
M0238
21660
25820
76445
21560
18190
24390
94220
H15J2
91160
DESCRIPTION
BENZENE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
TOLUENE
ASPHALT
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
PROPANOL, 1-
XYLENE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
CRESOL
NITRIC ACID
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
OICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
CARBOtl DISULFIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
DICHIOROETHANE, 1,2-
METHANOL
MANGANESE DRIER
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1-
TURPENTINE
ANILINE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS<2-
OIL, LUBE
CARBON
ETHYL ALCOHOL
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
GRAPHITE
PEHTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
ETHANOLAMINE
ALCOHOL
CYCLOHEXANONE
DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANOHE, 2,6-
VINYL CHLORIDE
CYCLOHEXANOL
CHLOROBENZENE
DICHLOROPROPANE, 1.2-
UOOU5
SILICA GEL
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
649
583
804
519
465
443
547
530
354
342
335
333
328
327
327
466
427
397
357
339
327
190
171
163
502
199
126
170
164
351
349
348
345
345
99
329
327
327
97
116
81
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.483
.434
.599
.387
.346
.330
.407
.395
.263
.255
.249
.24S
.244
.243
.243
.347
.318
.296
.266
.252
.243
.141
.127
.121
.374
.148
.093
.126
.122
.261
.260
.259
.257
.257
.073
.245
.243
.243
.072
.086
.060
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
03
07
10
07
07
03
03
03
03
03
10
03
03
03
10
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
4.839
4.347
4.196
3.870
3.467
3.303
2.855
2.766
2.639
2.550
2.498
2.483
2.445
2.438
2.438
2.432
2.228
2.072
.863
.769
.706
.416
.275
.215
.123
.038
.939
.887
.856
.785
.780
.778
.771
.771
.738
.736
.731
.731
.723
.605
.604
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
PLASTICS MATERIALS AND RESINS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HtAllM MuniniaiKniiun
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,341
12
IHFOfl
CODE
0430
2229
1040
2040
9030
1560
0950
0933
0527
1385
0374
0040
1730
> 1540
I 0686
H- 0490
S 1591
..1073
C9020
0440
0930
2611
0440
0435
1430
0686
1290
1538
18*2
0926
1610
1075
0686
0686
1033
1210
H50
0191
2310
NOHS
CODE
13980
M1463
31470
55460
71055
40987
59210
81806
M0647
37510
80517
02820
47270
40984
81876
83628
84546
27780
90310
13850
26560
77150
14380
29930
38580
19360
33640
40910
84269
27615
80298
83448
M0063
M0926
31350
32590
46410
M1226
70870
DESCRIPTION
BUTANONE. 2-
IROM OXIDE. RED
ETHYL ACETATE
PHENOL
TALC
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
C.I. 77266-PIGMEHT BLACK 7
METHYL-2-PENTANONE. 4-
SODIUM BORATE
ACETONE
DICHLOROMETHANE
ISOPROPYL ACETATE
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2+> SALT (1:1)
CADMIUM SULFIDE
LEAD SULFATE
METHYLENE BISPHENYL ISOCYANATE
ASBESTOS
BUTANOL
FORMAMIDE, N.H-DIMETHYL-
ZINC CHLORIDE
BUTYL ACETATE
ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY-
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
CHROMIC ACID
FORMALDEHYDE
ISOPHOROME
NICKEL OXIDE
DirHENYLAMINE
MAGNESIUM OXIDE
MEIHYL-3-HEPTAHONE, 5-
1MORGANIC CHROMATES
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
ETHOXYETHANOL, 2-
ETHYL ETHER
METHYL ACbTATE
ACETIC ACID, PENTYL ESTER
SULFURIC ACID
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
772
101
601
57
81
538
172
169
50
479
65
449
439
432
40
40
40
56
39
382
127
37
358
357
51
35
35
350
35
116
347
345
34
34
337
336
314
329
47
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.575
.075
.448
.042
.060
.401
.128
.126
.037
.357
.048
.334
.327
.322
.029
.029
.029
.041
.029
.284
.094
.027
.266
.266
.038
.026
.026
.260
.026
.086
.258
.257
.025
.025
.251
.250
.249
.245
.035
HAZARD
WEIGHT
01
07
01
10
07
01
03
03
10
01
07
01
01
01
10
10
10
07
10
01
03
10
01
01
07
10
10
01
10
03
01
01
10
10
01
01
01
01
o;
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.575
.527
.448
.425
.422
.401
.384
.378
.372
.357
.339
.334
.327
.322
.298
.298
.298
.292
.290
.284
.284
.275
.266
.266
.266
.260
.260
.260
.260
.259
.258
.257
.253
.253
.251
.250
.249
.245
.245
256 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2821
OTHER TOTALS:
27,985
20.729
102.657
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
2834 PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED—
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,480
15
IHFOM
CODE
2037
C0320
0527
2000
0170
1660
2040
0874
0570
9050
2460
0374
2590
1430
> 0760
' 2540
Ł 0867
*. 1860
1060
0020
1720
2490
0540
2170
2037
0720
1591
1620
1620
2310
0670
0220
2020
1060
2229
1010
1913
1797
90)0
1290
9085
NOHS
CODE
M2829
09070
80243
M0600
05250
45930
55460
24130
17490
84055
73300
80517
76720
38580
20380
74990
24003
50742
31500
01568
46970
73790
17370
M0256
M0630
M1023
M1690
81680
80454
70870
18500
06580
54790
M0238
M1463
25145
32385
48910
71055
J 1640
68768
DESCRIPTION
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
BENZENE
CARBON
PARAFFIN
AMMONIA
METHANOL
PHENOL
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
TOLUENE
SODIUM BORATE
XYLENE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
CRESOL
TURPENTINE
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
NITRIC ACID
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ACETIC ACID
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1-
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
CARBON DISULFIDE
PROPAHOL. 1-
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
COBALTOUS SULFATE
LEAD MONOXIDE FISHATE
MANGANESE SULFATE
MANGANESE GLUCONATE
SULFURIC ACID
CHLOROFORM
ANILINE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ALCOHOL
IRON OXIDE. RED
DIOXAHE, 1.4-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
MORPHOLINE
TAIC
FORMALDEHYDE
SOAPSIONE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
391
352
348
323
442
427
289
288
276
376
367
365
333
328
223
315
198
192
635
267
259
253
176
175
172
167
166
236
234
229
156
219
202
430
162
102
88
291
124
81
107
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.264
.237
.235
.218
.298
.288
.195
.194
.186
.254
.247
.246
.225
.221
.150
.212
.133
.129
.429
.180
.175
.170
.118
.118
.116
.112
.112
.159
.158
.154
.105
.147
.136
.290
.109
.068
.059
.196
.083
.054
.072
HAZARD WEIGHTED
HEIGHT INDEX
10 2.641
10 2.378
10 2.351
10 2.182
07 2.090
07 2.019
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
10
03
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
.952
.945
.864
.778
.735
.726
.575
.551
.506
.489
.337
.297
.287
.262
.225
.196
.189
.182
.162
.128
.121
.116
.106
.083
.054
.035
07 .955
03 .871
07 .766
10 .689
10 .594
03 .589
07 .586
10 .547
07 .506
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
?834 PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEAITH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,480
13
IHFOM
CODE
9210
1190
0830
2611
1030
0820
0160
0860
C0120
0686
1560
0620
2190
•> 0924
I 9090
- 1340
~" 0645
•" C2580
2583
2475
C1815
0760
1390
2577
0040
5010
0390
1280
0230
0640
0505
1620
1730
1591
2)60
2370
0529
1615
2470
NOHS
CODE
94220
32550
21660
77150
04980
21560
20265
M4016
03800
60370
40987
18190
24390
25820
17366
90880
29010
76445
83011
83655
84304
84364
84394
84575
02820
52131
13100
84425
07370
18040
15705
44030
47270
M1693
71640
71860
84027
80144
73)90
DESCRIPTION
WOODS
ETHYLENE OXIDE
CYCLOHEXANONE
ZINC CHLORIDE
ETHANOLAMINE
CYCLOHEXANOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
ACRYLONITRILE
POTASSIUM CHROMATE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
CHLOROBENZENE
DICHLOROPROPANE. 1.2-
DIMEIHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6-
GRAPHITE
GASOLINE-LEADED
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
VINYL CHLORIDE
D1CHLOROETHYLENE, 1.1-
TOLUIDINE
NAPHTHYLAMINE, ALPHA-
CRESOL. ORTHO-
DIAMINES
VINYL BROMIDE
ACETONE
OIL. CUTTING
BROMINE
SODIUM FLUORIDE
ANTIMONY POTASSIUM TARTRATE
CHLORINE
CALCIUM CARBONATE
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
DICHLOROMETHANE
LEAD SOAP
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAI1ETHYI LEAD
CYCLOhEXENE-l,2-DICARBOXlMIDE, N-(1RICHLOROMETHYL)THIO-.
MAGNESIUM CARBONATE
TOLUENE-2.4-D1ISOCYANATE
4-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
75
67
219
63
190
187
186
180
53
53
518
172
172
172
73
51
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
469
46
64
43
41
57
392
56
383
38
51
51
49
339
48
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.050
.045
.147
.042
.128
.126
.125
.121
.035
.035
.350
.116
.116
.116
.049
.034
.031
.031
.031
.031
.031
.031
.031
.031
.316
.031
.043
.029
.027
.038
.264
.037
.258
.025
.034
.034
.03)
.229
.032
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
03
10
03
03
03
03
10
10
01
03
03
03
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
10
07
10
10
07
01
07
01
10
07
07
07
01
07
.506
.452
.443
.425
.385
.379
.377
.364
.358
.358
.350
.348
.348
.348
.345
.344
.317
.317
.317
.317
.317
.317
.317
.317
.316
.310
.302
.290
.277
.269
.264
.264
.258
.256
.241
.241
.251
.229
.227
356 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 28)4
OTHER TOTALS;
26.390
17.674
86 907
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
2879 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
-—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
56 1
>
1
I— 1
en
a\
IHFOM
CODE
9210
0374
1913
2037
1369
9090
2170
0645
2040
2590
1660
2310
2216
2540
1620
9050
2425
0020
1310
0527
0170
1060
0933.
1060
0525
1720
1984
1791
0850
1616
1292
0760
1536
0290
2460
5010
1591
2020
2490
2532
0686
NOHS
CODE
94220
80517
32385
M2829
35960
17366
M0256
29010
55460
76720
45930
70870
65070
74990
81680
84055
28880
01568
33720
80243
05250
31500
81806
M0238
47800
46970
53920
80790
M0377
80046
84454
20380
40430
90320
73300
52138
83453
54790
7J790
62880
A1227
DESCRIPTION
WOODS
SODIUM BORATE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
HEPTACHLOR
GRAPHITE
PROPANOL, 1-
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
PHEHOL
XYLENE
METHANOL
SULFURIC ACID
PYRETHRUM
TURPENTINE
MANGANESE SULFATE
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
END05ULFAN
ACETIC ACID
FORMIC ACID
CARBON
AMMONIA
ETHYL ALCOHOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ALCOHOL
NAPHTHYL N-METHYLCARBAMATE, 1-
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1-
PARATHION
AMMONIUM MOLYBDATE(VI)
PHOSPHORIC ACID, 2,2-DICHLOROVINYL DIMETHYL ESTER
DIETHYL MERCAPTOSUCCINATE, 0,0- DIMETHYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE OF
FORMAMIDE
CRESOL
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
ASPHALT
TOLUENE
OIL, LUBE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLENE. TR1CHLORO-
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TR'ITOLYL ESTER
ORGANIC CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
20
24
16
15
15
21
14
14
14
19
18
17
16
16
16
16
15
14
14
8
11
21
20
19
17
7
7
16
15
15
14
4
4
4
5
3
3
3
3
3
2
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.357
.428
.285
.267
.267
.375
.250
.250
.250
.339
.321
.303
.285
.285
.285
.285
.267
.250
.250
.142
.196
.375
.357
.339
.303
.125
.125
.285
.267
.267
.250
.071
.071
.071
.089
.053
.053
.053
.053
.053
.035
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
03
03
03
03
07
07
03
03
03
03
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
3.571
2.999
2.857
2.678
2.678
2.625
2.500
2.500
2.500
2.374
2.249
2.124
.999
.999
.999
.999
.874
.750
.750
.428
.374
.125
.071
.017
.910
.875
.875
.857
.803
.803
.750
.714
.714
.714
.624
.535
.535
.374
.374
.374
.357
-------
5IC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
?879 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
56
IHFOM
CODE
C0320
0540
0670
0515
2065
0505
1610
1522
1615
1560
0460
2584
2220
> 2431
I 1170
i- 1680
12 1630
^ C0120
0570
1140
0867
0868
0874
0847
2611
1340
0926
1790
0675
0790
1595
1430
1989
22?8
2360
2370
2427
0710
0310
NOHS
CODE
09070
17370
18500
15743
58520
80165
80298
33230
80144
40987
13850
49580
65080
83921
46935
M0420
M0475
03800
17490
23660
24003
24006
24130
73750
77150
90880
27615
80056
M0419
M2865
09318
38560
54160
67530
71640
71860
71900
M0628
M2929
DESCRIPTION
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
DOLOMITE
MAGNESIUM OXIDE
FERROUS SULFATE
MAGNESIUM CARBONATE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
BUTAHOL
NAPHTHA-COAL TAR
PYRIDINE
ORGANIC TIN COMPOUNDS
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
BROMOMETHANE
MERCURY-CONTAINING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS
ACRYLONITRILE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DIBROMOETHAHE, 1,2-
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
DICHLOROBEHZENE, PARA-
DICHLOROETHAHE, 1,2-
DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE
ZINC CHLORIDE
GASOLIHE-LEADED
DIPHEHYLAMINE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
TRICHLOROHITROMETHAHE
CALCIUM CYANIDE
LINDANE
HYDROGEH CHLORIDE
PEHTACHLOROPHENOL
ROTEHONE
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETPAMETHYL LEAD
TEIRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
NAPHTHA
BARIUM PETKOIEUM SULFONATE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
2
2
2
18
16
17
17
16
16
15
14
14
14
2
4
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.035
.035
.035
.321
.321
.303
.303
.285
.285
.267
.250
.250
.250
.035
.071
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.053
.053
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.089
.071
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
03
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
01
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.357
.357
.357
.321
.321
.303
.303
.285
.285
.267
.250
.250
.250
.249
.214
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.178
.160
.160
.124
.124
.124
.124
.124
. 124
.124
.124
.124
.089
.071
100 SUBSTAHCES FOR SIC 2879
OTHER TOTALS:
761
13.530
70.905
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
307^1ISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
16.905
130
IHFOM
CODE
2037
0527
9050
2460
2590
9090
1290
2135
2229
1018
5010
2532
•« 20*°
7 0290
H- 1720
en C0320
oo 9030
0874
2490
0490
0760
2000
0686
2540
1591
1010
9210
2170
1660
0570
1779
1913
0490
0490
C9020
5010
9010
0527
1591
0374
0230
NOHS t , ,
CODE '*
M2829
80243
84055
73300
76720
17366
33640
80221
M1463
M0347
52138
82880
55460
90320
46970
09070
71055
24130
73790
83628
20380
M0600
81876
74990
83453
25145
94220
M0256
45930
17490
48535
32385
M2267
15570
90310
52131
M1806
M0647
42490
80517
07310
DESCRIPTION
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
CARBON
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
TOLUENE
XYLENE
GRAPHITE
FORMALDEHYDE
ETHYLENE, TETRAFLUORO-. POLYMER
IRON OXIDE, RED
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
OU, LUBE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
PHENOL
ASPHALT
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1-
BENZENE
TALC
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
CADMIUM SULFIDE
CRESOL
PARAFFIN
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2O SALT 0 =
TURPENTINE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
DIOXANE, 1,4-
WOODS
PROPANOL, 1-
METHANOL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
MICA
ETHYLEHE GLYCOL
C.I. 77196-PIGMENT ORANGE 20
CADMIUM
ASBESTOS
OIL, CUTTING
SILICA FLOUR
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
LEAD
SODIUM BORATE
ANTIMONY
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
3.719
2.001
2,353
2,255
2,064
2,019
,273
,785
,775
,227
.209
,623
,087
,056
,484
.006
1.419
979
1,394
872
811
784
763
1,070
750
723
723
700
965
671
952
663
658
650
644
639
910
613
628
868
603
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.219
.118
.139
.133
.122
.119
.075
.105
.105
.072
.071
.096
.064
.062
.087
.059
.083
.057
.082
.051
.047
.046
.045
.063
.044
.042
.042
.041
.057
.039
.056
.039
.038
.038
.038
.037
.053
.037
.037
.051
.035
HAZARD
UEIGHT
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
2.199
1.183
.974
.933
.854
.836
.753
.739
.736
.725
.715
.672
.643
.624
.614
.595
.587
.579
.577
.515
.479
.463
.451
.443
.443
.427
.427
.414
.399
.396
.394
.392
.389
.384
.380
.377
.376
.374
.371
.359
.356
•>
^
IK
*>
»
fe
*
•
•
ft
%
-------
>IC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3079 MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFFTY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
16,905
130
IHFOM
CODE
0230
1060
1941
1190
2020
1060
0686
1520
1591
0220
1631
0490
1560
> 0160
I 2620
*- 1860
Ł 1591
0867
1520
0490
2037
0540
0933
0860
1520
0590
C0260
0830
1536
1620
2540
0490
0020
0871
1620
2611
0490
1591
0686
NOHS
CODE
A1433
31500
51090
32550
54790
M0238
N1499
40297
83062
06580
M1643
01507
40987
20265
M0626
50742
84546
24003
70131
83718
M0630
17370
81806
M4016
80990
46240
07555
21660
40430
44030
M1322
M2270
01568
24095
81664
77150
15630
42685
M0926
DESCRIPTION
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
NITROPROPANE, 2-
ETHYLEHE OXIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ALCOHOL
CHROME GREEN
IRON OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE. TRIBASIC
AHILINE
MERCURY SULFIDE
CADMIUM LITIIOPONE SELENIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
NITRIC ACID
LEAD SULFATE
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
CADMIUM SELENIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-. 2-
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
METHOXYETHANOL, 2-
ARSENIC OXIDES
CYCLOHEXANONE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
TURPENTINE (GUM)
C.I. 77199-PIGMENT ORANGE 20
ACETIC ACID
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
MANGANESE OXIDE
ZINC CHLORIDE
CADMIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
585
1,934
569
509
728
1,677
501
696
488
687
463
460
4,558
1,454
610
416
416
413
591
413
378
378
1.249
1,211
504
490
340
129
336
455
454
317
428
2,918
413
272
270
266
260
1
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.034
.114
.033
.030
.043
.099
.029
.041
.028
.040
.027
.027
.269
.086
.036
.024
.024
.024
.034
.024
.022
.022
.073
.071
.029
.028
.020
.066
.019
.026
.026
.018
.025
.172
.024
.016
.015
.015
.015
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
03
10
10
07
03
10
07
10
07
10
10
01
03
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
03
03
07
07
10
03
10
07
07
10
07
01
07
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.346
.343
.336
.301
.301
.297
.296
.288
.288
.284
.273
.272
.269
.258
.252
.246
.246
.244
.244
.244
.223
.223
.221
.214
.208
.202
.201
.200
.198
.188
.187
.187
.177
.172
. 171
. 160
. 159
. 157
.153
419 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3079
OTHER TOTALS:
138,212
8.004
42.647
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3229 PRESSED AND BLOWN GLASS, NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
— NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
>
1
I-1
/T\
Ut
o
IHFOM
CODE
1750
2532
0230
2037
0230
1591
2620
2229
0335
1300
9030
9050
0575
0160
0686
1774
1520
0040
2280
0931
NOHS
CODE
80105
82880
A1433
M2S29
07310
42490
M0626
M1463
11220
33245
71055
84055
17683
20265
81876
47700
80990
02820
70130
26335
DESCRIPTION
METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ANTIMONY
LEAD
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDE, RED
BENZOYL PEROXIDE
FIBERGLASS
TALC
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
CELLULOSE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
METHYL METHACRYLATE
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
ACETONE
STYRENE
DIMETHYLANILINE. N.N-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
16
16
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
16
5
1
1
1
6
6
5
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1.777
1.777
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
1.777
.555
.111
.111
.111
.666
.666
.555
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
01
03
10
07
07
01
01
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
17.777
12.444
5.555
5.555
5.555
5.555
3.888
3.888
3.888
3.888
3.888
3.888
1.777
1.666
1.111
.777
.777
.666
.666
.555
20 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3229
OTHER TOTALS'
123
13.656
83.764
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
J312 BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL MILLS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
53,724
19
IHFOM
CODE
1842
0490
1520
2537
5010
9050
2229
9090
2037
1591
0700
2490
2611
> 5010
' 1520
Ł 1520
M 0230
0686
2532
0374
1520
2590
1591
0230
1591
9030
0290
2620
9010
1720
2460
C9020
1591
0874
0570
0160
0695
0760
0560
1660
CO J20
NOHS
CODE
50495
15630
40297
A1003
52138
84055
M1463
17366
M2829
83453
90620
73790
77150
52131
80990
70131
07310
M0063
82880
80517
M0130
76720
42490
A1433
91160
71055
90320
M0626
67915
46970
73300
90310
42685
24130
17490
20265
19767
203BO
17460
45930
09070
NICKEL OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
OIL. LUBE
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDE. RED
GRAPHITE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
COAL TAR PITCH VOLATILES
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
ZINC CHLORIDE
OIL. CUTTING
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
ANTIMONY
INORGANIC CHROMATES
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
SODIUM BORATE
FERROUS OXIDE
XYLENE
LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
TALC
ASPHALT
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
SAND
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
TOLUENE
ASBESTOS
LEAD OXIDES
DICHLOROETHANE. 1,2-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
COAL
CRESOL
CARBON MONOXIDE
MF1HAHOL
BLtlZENE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
18.814
18,790
22,791
18.688
9,704
13.351
12.503
11.778
7,926
6,988
5.730
7.870
4.993
4.957
925
462
437
358
151
087
027
5,913
4. 121
4.077
3.936
5,060
3.334
4.162
4,141
4,078
4,055
2.682
2.657
2,525
,484
,076
,440
,392
,390
,366
2,279
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.350
.349
.424
.347
.180
.248
.232
.219
.147
.130
.106
.146
.092
.092
.128
.120
.082
.081
.114
.113
.112
.110
.076
.075
.073
.094
.062
.077
.077
.075
.075
.049
.049
.046
.046
. 150
.064
.04f»
.063
.062
.042
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
03
07
10
07
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
3.501
3.497
2.969
2.434
.806
.739
.629
.534
.475
.300
.066
.025
.929
.922
.902
.841
.825
.811
.801
.793
.785
.770
.767
.758
.732
.659
.620
.542
.539
.531
.528
.499
.494
.469
.462
.450
.448
.445
.441
.438
424
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOUS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED- —
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3312 BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL MILLS
DESCRIPTION
53.724
19
IHFOM
CODE
2020
0527
2080
1913
0170
1631
0867
0360
2420
0220
2170
0540
2037
> 0686
1 1030
M 1060
m 0926
10 1620
1620
1790
2540
2570
0686
1430
9210
2040
2310
1591
1060
C0260
1591
1591
1340
1018
1536
2000
0686
1620
0577
NOHS
FCODE
54790
80243
57740
32385
05250
45315
24003
11855
72085
06580
M0256
17370
M0630
80064
04980
M0238
27615
44000
44035
80056
74990
AI010
81876
38580
94220
55460
70870
M0125
31500
07555
84546
M0126
90880
M0347
40430
M0600
M0900
44025
17695
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CARBON
PHOSPHINE
ETHYLENE 6LYCOL
AtinOMIA
MERCURY OXIDES
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
ANILINE
PROPANOL, 1-
CARBON DISULFIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
ETHANOLAMINE
ALCOHOL
DIPHENYLAMINE
MANGANESE
MANGANESE OXIDES
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
TURPENTINE
VANADIUM OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2+) SALT (1=1)
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
WOODS
PHENOL
SULFURIC ACID
LEAD MONOXIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
LEAD TETROXIDE
GASOLINE-LEADED
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS<2-
ISOOUTYL ALCOHOL
PARAFFIN
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1=1)
INORGANIC MANGANESE COMPOUNDS
CEMENT-PORTLAND
388 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3312'
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
3.201
2.194
2.168
2.077
2.791
1.886
1,883
1.857
1,849
2.462
1.706
1,680
1.671
1,575
5.084
4.983
4.795
2.044
2,024
4,706
2.002
1,857
1,266
1,668
1,136
1.127
1.541
1,067
3,412
1,016
1.016
995
966
955
930
922
920
1.314
1,288
516,055
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.059
.040
.040
.038
.051
.035
.035
.034
.034
.045
.031
.031
.031
.029
.094
.092
.089
.038
.037
.087
.037
.034
.023
.031
.021
.020
.028
.019
.063
.018
.018
.018
.017
.017
.017
.017
.017
.024
.023
9.433
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
03
03
03
07
07
03
07
07
10
07
10
10
07
10
03
.10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
,
WEIGHTE
INDEX
.417
.408
.403
.386
.363
.351
.350
.345
.344
.320
.317
.312
.311
.293
.283
.278
.267
.266
.263
.262
.260
.241
.235
.2
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
B
a
B
f
.
.
w
„
.1
60.0
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3441
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
HOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
FABRICATED STRUCTURAL METAL
DESCRIPTION
4,557
36
IHFOM
CODE
0490
1842
2080
1631
1591
0360
2420
1520
2537
0560
9050
2570
1620
> 1790
I 5010
tr 5010
Ł 2037
2229
1591
0230
0230
1980
0530
2620
0730
2440
2587
2590
1591
0686
2460
0290
C0260
1591
2532
0160
0686
1720
2490
1520
1520
NOHS
CODE
15630
50495
57740
45315
42685
11855
72085
40297
A1003
17460
84055
A1010
44035
48628
52131
52138
M2829
111463
42490
07310
A1433
81651
17367
M0626
20170
A1211
76618
76720
83453
81876
73300
90320
07555
84546
82880
20265
80064
46970
7J790
80990
70131
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
MERCURY OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
VAHADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
OIL, CUTTING
OIL. LUBE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
IRON OXIDE, RED
LEAD
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
OZONE
CARBON DIOXIDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
COPPER OXIDES
TITANIUM. OXIDES OF
WELDING RODS
XYLEME
LEAD HAPHTHENATE
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD<2»> SALT (1:1)
TOLUENE
ASPHALT
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ALUMINUM OXIDE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
TRICHIOROETHANE. 1.1,1-
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
IROH OXIDt, YELLOW
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
5,135
5.135
4,205
3,784
3,773
3,769
3,769
5,128
4,889
4,205
4,149
3,769
3.769
3,769
768
758
692
974
596
585
583
4,220
4.209
583
3.775
3.769
3,769
454
279
273
364
232
205
205
292
666
200
279
275
259
240
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1
1
1
1
.126
.126
.922
.830
.827
.827
.827
.125
.072
.922
.910
.827
.827
.827
.168
.166
.151
.213
.130
.128
.127
.926
.923
.127
.828
.827
.827
.099
.061
.059
.079
.050
.044
.044
.064
.146
.043
.061
.060
.056
. 002
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
03
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
01
01
07
01
01
01
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
03
10
07
07
07
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX •
11
11
9
a
8
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.268
.268
.227 »
.303
.279
.270
.270 •
.877
.509
.459
.373
.789
.789
.481
.685 »
.663
.518
.496
.307
.283
.279
.926
.923 »
.895
.828
.827
.827 •
.697
.612
.599
.559
.509
.449
.449
.448
.438
.438
.428
.422
. 397
. 368
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3441 FABRICATED STRUCTURAL METAL
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
4,557
36
IHFOM
CODE
1520
C9020
0686
2611
2090
1060
1430
0527
0170
1970
0760
1280
2000
2020
0374
1591
1913
9030
1591
9090
0874
0230
0926
0570
9050
1060
1591
9085
2540
0933
2610
1030
0686
1340
0686
2540
1591
0310
1779
NOHS
CODE
M0130
90310
M0900
77150
81650
M0238
38580
80243
05250
52480
20380
81945
M0600
54790
80517
M0126
32385
71055
84743
17366
24130
M1109
27615
17490
80542
31500
M1693
68768
74990
81806
77190
04980
68900
90880
M0063
M1322
91160
M2929
48535
DESCRIPTION
FERROUS OXIDE
ASBESTOS
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
ZINC CHLORIDE
PHOSPHORUS
ALCOHOL
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
CARBON
AMMONIA
OXALIC ACID
CRESOL
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
PARAFFIN
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD TETROXIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
TALC
LEAD SILICOCHROMATE
GRAPHITE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
ANTIMONY DITHIOCARBAMATE
DIPHENYLAMINE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
SILICA, FUMED
ETHYL ALCOHOL
LEAD SOAP
SOAPSTONE
TURPENTINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
ZIHC OXIDE
ETHANOLAMINE
SODIUM CHROMATE(VI)
GASOLINE-LEADED
INORGANIC CHROMATES
TURPENTINE (GUM)
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
MICA
265 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3441
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
235
163
157
154
153
428
170
115
159
108
105
94
83
112
108
71
70
100
69
98
68
66
218
60
85
196
53
75
69
157
463
153
46
44
43
57
40
396
49
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.051
.035
.034
.033
.033
.093
.037
.025
.034
.023
.023
.020
.018
.024
.023
.015
.015
.021
.015
.021
.014
.014
.047
.013
.018
.043
.011
.016
.015
.034
.101
.033
.010
.009
.009
.012
.008
.086
.010
HAZARD
HEIGHT
07
10
10
10
10
03
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
03
10
07
03
10
07
07
03
01
03
10
10
10
07
10
01
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.360
.357
.344
.337
.335
.281
.261
.252
.244
.236
.230
.206
.182
.172
.165
.155
.153
.153
.151
.150
.149
.144
.143
.131
.130
.129
.116
.115
.105
.103
.101
.100
.100
.096
.094
.087
.087
.086
.075
OTHER TOTALS:
99,026
21.597
139.065
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3444 SHEET METAL WORK
NOHS
EMPLOYMENT
2,837
SURVEYED ---
FIRMS
ui
IHFOM
CODE
0490
1842
2080
1520
2537
1591
1631
0360
2420
0560
9050
2570
1620
0230
1591
0230
1018
5010
2037
0290
2229
2620
1790
2460
5010
C9020
2490
1591
1720
9210
0160
0530
1980
2590
2532
9090
1591
1591
0686
0686
0730
NOHS
CODE
15630
50495
57740
40297
AI003
42685
45315
11855
72085
17460
84055
A1010
44035
07310
42490
A1433
M0347
52138
M2829
90320
M1463
M0626
48628
73300
52131
90310
73790
83453
46970
94220
20265
17367
81651
76720
82880
17366
M0125
M0126
80064
81876
20170
DESCRIPTION
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
ANTIMONY
LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
OIL. LUBE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ASPHALT
IRON OXIDE, RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
TOLUENE
OIL, CUTTING
ASBESTOS
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
TRICHLOROETHANE,
MOODS
ALUMINUM OXIDE
CARBON DIOXIDE
OZONE
XYLEHE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
GRAPHITE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2») SALT (1=1
COPPER OXIDES
1
1,1.1-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
2,206
2,206
1,597
2,185
2,128
1,286
,200
,193
,193
,618
,519
,193
,193
536
527
524
475
432
418
410
562
524
.193
435
245
206
293
200
280
169
560
,615
,597
224
217
216
132
130
124
124
, 196
1
1
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.777
.777
.562
.770
.750
.453
.422
.420
.420
.570
.535
.420
.420
.188
.185
.184
.167
.152
.147
.144
.198
.184
.420
.153
.086
.072
.103
.070
.098
.059
.197
.569
.562
.078
.076
.076
.046
.045
.043
.043
.421
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
03
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
03
01
01
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
01
7.775
7.775
5.629
5.391
5.250
4.532
4.229
4.205
4.205
3.992
3.747
2.943
2.943
.889
.857
.847
.674
.522
.473
.445
.386
1.292
1.261
1.073
.863
.726
.722
.704
.690
.595
.592
.569
.562
.552
.535
.532
.465
.458
.437
.437
.421
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3444 SHEET METAL WORK
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
>
1
I
t-1
en
a\
IHFOM
CODE
2440
2587
C0260
1591
2611
0527
1591
1591
1591
1591
2090
1430
9050
2000
COJ20
0760
1660
2432
2432
2432
0933
0874
2020
0374
0570
1842
1060
0505
0926
1030
1060
0867
1170
0686
1591
9030
0520
1536
2540
NOHS
CODE
A1211
76618
07555
84546
77150
80243
81000
81677
84544
M0751
81650
38580
80542
M0600
09070
20380
45930
73253
M0877
82157
81806
24130
54790
80517
17490
84269
M0238
15705
27615
04980
31500
24003
46935
M0900
M1693
71055
15755
40430
74990
2,817
3ft
DESCRIPTION
TITANIUM, OXIDES OF
MELDING RODS
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
ZINC CHLORIDE
CARBON
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIOE
LEAD DIOXIDE
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
PHOSPHORUS
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
SILICA, FUMED
PARAFFIN
BENZENE
CRESOL
METHANOL
TIN OXIDES
STANNIC OXIDE
STANNOUS OXIDE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
SODIUM BORATE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NICKEL OXIDE
ALCOHOL
CALCIUM CARBONATE
DIPHENYLAMINE
ETHANOLAMINE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHQ-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT UU)
LEAD SOAP
TALC
CALCIUM OXIDE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
TURPENTINE
226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3444
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.193
1.193
118
118
116
113
111
111
111
100
100
141
132
86
81
79
113
113
111
111
245
70
96
92
61
56
177
516
172
170
165
49
156
44
44
63
437
43
60
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.420
.420
.041
.041
.040
.039
.039
.039
.039
.035
.035
.049
.046
.030
.028
.027
.039
.039
.039
.039
.086
.024
.033
.032
.021
.019
.•62
.181
.060
.059
.058
.017
.054
.015
.015
.022
.154
.015
.021
HAZARD
HEIGHT
01
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
03
10
07
07
10
10
03
01
03
03
03
10
03
10
10
07
01
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.420
.420
.415
.415
.408
.398
.391
.391
.391
.352
.352
.347
.325
.303
.285
.278
.278
.278
.273
.273
.259
.246
.236
.227
.21!
.197
.181
.181
.181
.w
.174
.172
.16'
.15!
.15!
.15!
.15<
.15]
.141
OTHER TOTALS>
46,895
16.423
105.21]
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3469 METAL STAMPINGS. NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AMD HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
4.871
40
IHFOM
CODE
5010
5010
9050
0490
1842
1591
0230
0230
1591
2037
1520
2537
2532
> 2490
I 2229
^ 1060
^ 2620
2590
2000
0374
2080
1030
1779*
1591
0560
0360
1631
2420
0170
0160
2540
1720
2611
9090
0686
2570
1620
0686
0926
1060
0220
NOHS
CODE
52131
52138
84055
15630
50495
42490
07310
A1433
83453
M2829
40297
A1003
82880
73790
M1463
M0238
M0626
76720
M0600
80517
57740
04980
48535
42685
17460
11855
45315
72085
05250
20265
74990
46970
77150
17366
M0900
A1010
44035
80064
27615
3)500
06580
DESCRIPTION
OIL. CUTTING
OIL, LUBE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
LEAD
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
IRON OXIDE, RED
ALCOHOL
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
XYLENE
PARAFFIN
SODIUM BORATE
PHOSPHINE
ETHANOLAMINE
MICA
LEAD OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MEkcurtt OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
AMMONIA
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TURPENTINE
TRICHLOROETHANE,
ZINC CHLORIDE
GRAPHITE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
DIPHENYLAMINE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ANILINE
1.1,1-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1,623
1,254
1,489
847
837
717
677
675
660
606
830
801
795
786
778
1,777
713
675
469
591
405
1,347
454
299
405
270
270
270
JiO
816
349
348
232
286
200
270
270
185
600
570
227
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.333
.257
.305
.173
.171
.147
.138
.138
.135
.124
.170
.164
.163
.161
.159
.364
.146
.138
.096
.121
.083
.276
.093
.061
.083
.055
.055
.055
.073
.167
.071
.071
.047
.058
.041
.055
.055
.037
.123
.117
.046
HAZARD HEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 3.331
10 2.574
07 2.139
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
03
07
.738
.718
.471
.389
.385
.354
.244
.192
.151
.142
.129
.118
.094
.024
07 .970
10 .962
07 .849
10 .831
03 .829
07 .652
10 .613
07 .582
10 .554
10 .554
10 .554
07 .517
03 .502
07 .501
07 .500
in 474
07 1411
10 .410
07 .388
07 .388
10 .379
03 .369
03 .351
07 .326
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3469 METAL STAMPINGS. NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
- — NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
4,671
40
IHFOM
CODE
1591
0686
1520
2460
1290
9030
2020
0760
1660
1430
1797
0867
0527
> 1790
1 1790
t- 0874
Ł 1280
00 0570
0310
2432
2260
1591
C0320
9210
0505
1970
2170
0460
0686
2037
0540
2140
2310
9010
1591
0440
1591
1591
1591
NOHS
CODE
91160
M0063
80990
73300
33640
71055
54790
20380
45930
38580
48910
24003
80243
48628
80056
24130
81945
17490
M2929
73253
69070
M1693
09070
94220
15705
52480
M0256
13850.
19360
M0630
17370
60440
70870
M1806
81000
143BO
M0125
M0126
81677
DESCRIPTION
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
INORGANIC CHROMATES
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
TOLUENE
FORMALDEHYDE
TALC
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CRESOL
METHANOL
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
MORPHOLINE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
CARBON
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2-
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
TIN OXIDES
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
LEAD SOAP
BENZENE
WOODS
CALCIUM CARBONATE
OXALIC ACID
PROPANOL, 1-
BUTANOL
CHROMIC ACID
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
SULFURIC ACID
SILICA FLOUR
LEAD SUBOXIDE
BUTYL ACETATE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
267 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3469
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
147
140
186
171
117
161
148
99
141
137
299
89
84
272
257
76
76
73
687
96
645
62
62
60
595
56
54
536
54
53
53
511
72
70
46
449
44
44
42
40,191
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.030
.028
.038
.035
.024
.033
.030
.020
.028
.028
.061
.018
.017
.055
.052
.015
.015
.014
.141
.019
.132
.012
.012
.012
.122
.011
.011
.110
.011
.010
.010
.104
.014
.014
.009
.092
.009
.009
.008
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
10
07
07
03
10
10
03
03
10
10
10
01
07
01
10
10
10
01
10
10
01
10
10
10
01
07
07
10
01
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.301
.287
.267
.245
.240
.231
.212
.203
.202
.196
.184
.182
.172
.167
.158
.156
.156
.149
.141
.137
.132
.127
.127
.123
.122
.114
.110
.110
.110
.108
.108
.104
.103
.100
.094
.092
.090
.090
.086
8.132
49.346
-------
1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
471 PLATING AND POLISHING
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
771
IHFOM
CODE
1860
0686
2310
1430
9050
2229
2037
2620
1520
1840
0160
2432
9010
2537
C9020
1840
1460
0790
0490
0374
1591
1840
0686
0170
0790
0020
2460
1591
1840
0790
0790
1842
1018
2240
0230
0230
2040
0290
2490
2590
2000
NOHS
CODE
50742
19360
70870
38580
84055
M1463
M2829
M0626
40297
50510
20265
73253
Ml 8 06
80230
90310
81906
38550
68950
15630
80517
42490
81904
90570
05250
60400
01568
73300
M0751
50440
80720
M0052
50495
M0347
M0105
A1433
07310
55460
90320
73790
76720
F10600
DESCRIPTION
NITRIC ACID
CHROMIC ACID
SULFURIC ACID
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDE, RED
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDES
NICKEL SULFATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
SILICA FLOUR
TUNGSTEN CARBIDE
ASBESTOS
NICKEL ACETATE
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
SODIUM CYANIDE
CADMIUM OXIDES
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD
NICKEL SALTS
CHROMOUS SALTS
AMMONIA
POTASSIUM CYANIDE
ACETIC ACID
TOLUENE
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
NICKEL CHLORIDE
ZIMC CYANIDE
INORGANIC CYANIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2-
INORGANIC SILVER COMPOUNDS
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
PHEHOL
ASPHALT
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
XYIENE
PARAFFIN
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
257
241
329
275
251
241
153
217
193
134
411
173
166
166
112
100
96
136
90
128
87
87
87
120
115
114
114
75
70
97
96
66
61
87
57
57
53
52
74
73
49
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.333
.312
.426
.356
.325
.312
.198
.281
.250
.173
.533
.224
.215
.215
.145
.129
.124
.176
.116
.166
.112
.112
.112
.155
.149
.147
.147
.097
.090
.125
.124
.085
.079
.112
.073
.073
.068
.067
.095
.094
.063
HAZARD WEIGHTED
HEIGHT INDEX
10 3.333
10 3.125
07 2.987
07 2.496
07 2.278
07 2.188
10
07
07
10
03
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
.984
.970
.752
.738
.599
.570
.507
.507
.452
.297
.245
.234
.167
.162
.128
.128
.128
.089
.044
.035
.035
10 .972
10 .907
07 .880'
07 .871
10 .856
10 .791
07 .789
10 .739
10 .739
10 .607
10 .674
07 .671
07 .662
10 .635
-------
.1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
PLATING AND POLISHING
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
UITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
771
23
IHFOM
CCDE
1536
1631
C0320
0570
0874
1842
0490
2537
0686
0760
1290
0790
0360
•h, 1591
T 2260
M 1720
-J 1660
o 2080
2420
2085
2611
0527
2170
1842
0560
0735
1620
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
0490
2570
1060
1591
9090
NOHS
CODE
40430
45315
09070
17490
24130
50420
82783
A1003
80064
20380
33640
81950
11855
42685
69070
46970
45930
57740
72085
58520
77150
80243
M0256
82846
17460
94040
44035
80247
81748
81749
83005
83628
83718
84157
84478
A1010
31500
M0125
17366
DESCRIPTION
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
MERCURY OXIDES
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
NICKEL
CADMIUM CYANIDE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CRESOL
FORMALDEHYDE
GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1-
METHAHOL
PHOSPHIHE
THALLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHORIC ACID
ZINC CHLORIDE
CARBON
PROPAHOL. 1-
NICKEL CYANIDE
CARBON MONOXIDE
COTTON
MANGANESE OXIDES
CADMIUM SULFATE
CADMIUM IODIDE
CADMIUM NITRATE
CADMIUM TELLURIDE
CADMIUM SULFIDE
CADMIUM SELENIDE
CADMIUM PHOSPHATE
CADMIUM CHLORIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
ETHYL ALCOHOL
LEAD MONOXIDE
GRAPHITE
257 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3471
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
49
46
45
45
45
45
45
63
43
42
42
57
38
38
376
51
50
35
35
332
32
32
30
30
41
41
38
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
35
75
21
30
11.089
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.063
.059
.058
.058
.058
.058
.058
.081
.055
.054
.054
.073
.049
.049
.487
.066
.064
.045
.045
.430
.041
.041
.038
.038
.053
.053
.049
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.032
.045
.097
.027
.038
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
01
07
07
10
10
01
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.635
.596
.583
.583
.583
.583
.583
.571
.557
.544
.544
.517
.492
.492
.487
.463
.453
.453
.453
.430
.415
.415
.389
.389
.372
.372
.345
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.324
.317
.291
.272
.272
14.244
86.252
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
METAL COATING AND ALLIED SERVICES
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
252
10
IHFOM
CODE
I860
1460
0686
1840
0686
1430
2310
0790
2240
C0320
2460
2037
0874
0160
2590
0790
1720
1591
1591
0527
1536
9050
0570
1060
0686
0645
0860
1631
1018
2000
2490
1660
1591
1591
1840
0686
1840
C0260
C25BO
1591
0686
NOHS
CODE
50742
38550
19360
81904
90570
38580
70870
M0052
M0105
09070
73300
M2829
24130
20265
76720
68950
46970
M0125
M0126
80243
40430
84055
17490
31500
M0900
29010
M4016
45315
MO 34 7
M0600
73790
45930
A1297
M0751
M0778
M1499
M1782
07545
76445
80252
81876
NITRIC ACID '
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
CHROMIC ACID
NICKEL SALTS
CHROMOUS SALTS
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
SULFURIC ACID
INORGANIC CYANIDES
INORGANIC SILVER COMPOUNDS
BENZENE
TOLUENE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
ALUillNUn OXIDE
XYLENE
SODIUM CYANIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
CARBON
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-,
MERCURY OXIDES
EIHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
PARAFFIN
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
METHANOL
LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
NICKEL TITANATE
CHROME GREEN
NICKEL-AN1IMONY TITANATES
ARSENIC
VINYL CHLORIDE
LEAD CARDONATE
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2») SALT (I'l)
2-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
331
231
229
225
225
230
230
225
225
150
159
101
82
252
105
86
85
53
53
53
51
72
46
151
45
45
149
44
43
43
60
59
41
41
41
41
4
4
4
4
4
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1.313
.916
.908
.892
.892
.912
.912
.892
.892
.595
.630
.400
.325
1.000
.416
.341
.337
.210
.210
.210
.202
.285
.182
.599
.178
.178
.591
.174
.170
.170
.238
.234
.162
.162
.162
.162
.162
.162
. 162
.162
. 162
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 13.134
10 .166
10 .087
10 .928
10 .928
07 .388
07 .388
07 .249
07 6.249
10 5.952
07 4.416
10 4.007
10 3.253
03 3.000
07 2.916
07 2.388
07 2.361
10 2.103
10 2.103
10 2.103
10 2.023
07
10
03
10
10
03
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
.999
.825
.797
.785
.785
.773
.746
.706
.706
.666
.638
.626
.626
.626
.626
.626
.626
.626
.636
.626
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY HEIGHTED INDEX
UITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3479 METAL COATING AND ALLIED SERVICES
DESCRIPTION
— -NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
252
10
K>
IHFOM
CODE
9030
2229
2532
1010
1941
1520
2020
1060
1520
9050
0590
2085
2140
2260
2430
0515
5010
2682
0735
0040
1591
1840
1030
1040
2427
2135
9210
0830
2611
1591
1591
1591
1591
1610
1560
0460
0686
0435
0430
NOHS
CODE
71055
H1463
82880
25145
51090
40297
54790
M0238
80990
M1532
46240
58520
60440
69070
M0120
15743
52138
80219
94040
02820
42685
50510
04980
31470
71900
80221
94220
21660
77150
81000
81677
83453
84544
80298
40987
13850
80064
29930
13980
TALC
IRON OXIDE, RED
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
DIOXANE. 1.4-
NITROPROPANE. 2-
IRON OXIDES
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ALCOHOL
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
SILICA GEL
METHOXYETHANOL, 2-
PHOSPHORIC ACID
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
INORGANIC TIN COMPOUNDS
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
OIL. LUBE
TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
COTTON
ACETONE
LEAD OXIDES
NICKEL SULFATE
ETHANOLAMINE
ETHYL ACETATE
TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
ETHYLEHE. TETRAFLUORO-. POLYMER
WOODS
CYCLOHEXANONE
ZINC CHLORIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
LEAD DIOXIDE
MAGNESIUM OXIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
BUTAIIOl
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
ETHAHOl. 2-BUTOXY-
BUTANOHE. 2-
165 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3479
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
54
53
53
37
36
49
46
106
45
41
41
275
271
243
225
225
20
20
25
152
15
15
48
141
20
20
14
45
13
12
12
12
12
110
105
101
10
99
94
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.214
.210
.210
.146
.142
.194
.182
.420
.178
.162
.162
1.091
1.075
.964
.892
.892
.079
.079
.099
.603
.059
.059
.190
.559
.079
.079
.055
.178
.051
.047
.047
.047
.047
.436
.416
.400
.039
.392
.373
HAZARD
HEIGHT
07
07
07
10
10
07
07
03
07
07
07
01
01
01
01
01
10
10
07
01
10
10
03
01
07
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
01
01
01
10
01
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.499
.472
.472
.468
.428
.361
.277
.261
.249
.138
.138
1.091
1.075
.964
.892
.892
.793
.793
.694
.603
.595
.595
.571
.559
.555
.555
.555
.535
.515
.476
.476
.476
.476
.436
.416
.400
.396
.392
.373
OTHER TOTALS'
8,734
34.548
188.304
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAPtIT AMD HEML in MuninisiKM•iun
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
>IC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1499 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS. NEC.
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3,486
28
IHFOM
CODE
1842
0490
2037
1520
2000
2537
5010
9050
1591
0230
0230
2080
2229
1591
> 5010
' UJ1
^ 1591
tj 0360
2590
2620
2420
2490
0560
2532
1620
1842
2570
2460
0160
1591
1290
1460
1720
2040
0926
0170
C0320
0527
1790
1520
1060
NOHS
CODE
50495
15630
M2829
40297
M0600
A1003
52138
84055
42490
07310
A1433
57740
M1463
42685
52131
45315
83453
11855
76720
M0626
72085
73790
17460
82880
44035
84269
A1010
73300
20265
M0751
33640
38550
46970
55460
27615
05250
09070
80243
48628
80990
110238
NICKEL OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
IRON OXIDES
PARAFFIN
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
OIL, LUBE
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
LEAD
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
PHOSPHINE
IRON OXIDE. RED
LEAD OXIDES
OIL. CUTTING
MERCURY OXIDES
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
XYLENE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
THALLIUM OXIDES
ETHYLEIIE. TRICHLORO-
CARBON MONOXIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
MANGANESE OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
TOLUENE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
FORMALDEHYDE
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1-
PHENOL
D1PHENYLAMINE
ANI10NIA
BENZEHE
CARBON
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
IKON OXIDE, YEUOU
ALCOHOL
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.429
1,386
1.323
1,532
1,042
1,408
936
1,269
720
702
696
608
849
559
535
521
519
518
732
719
474
677
652
627
518
357
474
419
783
209
203
189
249
168
507
217
149
148
474
196
453
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.409
.397
.379
.439
.298
.403
.268
.364
.206
.201
.199
.174
.243
.160
.153
.149
.148
.148
.209
.206
.135
.194
.187
.179
.148
.102
.135
.120
.224
.059
.058
.054
.071
.048
.145
.062
.042
.042
. 135
.056
.129
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 4.099
10 3.975
10 3.795
07 3.076
10 2.989
07 2.827
10 2.685
07 2.548
10 2.065
10 2.013
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
07
10
.996
.744
.704
.603
.534
.494
.488
.485
.469
.443
.359
.359
.309
.259
.040
.024
07 .951
07 .841
03 .673
10 .599
10 .582
10 .542
07 .499
10 .481
03 416
07 .435
10 .427
10 .424
03 .407
07 .393
03 .389
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1499 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS. NEC.
DESCRIPTION
3,486
28
IHFOM
CODE
0290
1030
C9020
1060
1660
2432
0374
9090
1779
1018
1591
1591
1536
1520
> 0874
I 1520
"I 0686
^ 0570
1591
1591
1591
1591
2611
9010
0686
0220
0310
1989
0530
0867
0686
2020
0760
1860
0730
1980
2170
2432
0490
NOHS
CODE t
90320
04980
90310
31500
45930
73253
80517
17366
48535
M0347
M0125
M0126
40430
110130
24130
70131
80064
17490
M1693
81000
81677
84544
77150
67915
M0900
06580
M2929
54160
17367
24003
81876
54790
20380
50742
20170
81651
M0256
M0877
M1554
ASPHALT
ETHANOLAMINE
ASBESTOS
ETHYL ALCOHOL
METHANOL
TIN OXIDES
SODIUM BORATE
GRAPHITE
MICA
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2-
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
FERROUS OXIDE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
LEAD SOAP
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
ZINC CHLORIDE
SAND
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1>1)
ANILINE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
CARBON DIOXIDE
DICHLOROBENZEHE. ORTHO-
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2O SALT (1 = 1)
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CRESOL
NITRIC ACID
COPPER OXIDES
OZONE
PROPANOL, 1-
STANNIC OXIDE
CADMIUM OXIDE
275 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3499
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
133
428
115
362
152
150
150
148
147
100
94
94
94
132
92
130
91
88
84
83
83
83
80
110
72
103
714
100
694
68
68
96
65
62
607
608
60
83
58
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.038
.122
.032
.103
.043
.043
.043
.042
.042
.028
.026
.026
.026
.037
.026
.037
.026
.025
.024
.023
.023
.023
.022
.031
.020
.029
.204
.028
.199
.019
.019
.027
.018
.017
.174
.174
.017
.023
.016
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
03
10
03
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
01
07
01
10
10
07
10
10
01
01
10
07
.10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.381
.368
.329
.311
.305
.301
.301
.297
.295
.286
.269
.269
.269
.265
.263
.261
.261
.252
.240
.238
.238
.238
.229
.220
.206
.206
.204
.200
.199
.195
.195
.192
.186
.177
.174
.174
.172
.166
.166
OTHER TOTALS:
42.506
12.057
78.937
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3511
OCCUP*IIon«L aoreir wnu neMiin nuniniaiKM I tun
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
TURBINES AND TURBINE GENERATOR SETS
DESCRIPTION
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
OIL, CUTTING
ANTIMONY
LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
OIL, LUBE
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
IRON OXIDE, RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
GRAPHITE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1-
ALUMINUM OXIDE
XYLENE
ALCOHOL
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
TOLUENE
CARBON
ETHANOLAMINE
NICKEL OXIDE
PHENOL
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
LEAD NAPHTHEMATE
CARBON DIOXIDE
COPPER OXIDES
TITANIUM. OXIDES OF
WELDING RODS
PARAFFIN
5.234
IHFOM
CODE
0490
1842
1520
2537
1631
1591
0360
2420
2080
9050
2570
1620
0560
> 5010
I 0230
•- 1591
^ 0230
5010
1790
2229
2620
2037
9090
1720
0160
2590
1060
2490
2460
0527
1030
1842
2040
1913
1591
1591
0530
0730
2440
2587
2000
NOHS
CODE
15630
50495
40297
A1003
45315
42685
11855
72085
57740
84055
A1010
44035
17460
52131
07310
42490
A1433
52138
48628
M1463
M0626
M2829
17366
46970
20265
76720
M0238
73790
73300
80243
04980
84269
55460
32385
91160
83453
17367
20170
A1211
76618
M0600
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
2,915
2,909
2,762
2,755
,722
,700
,656
,656
.629
,176
.656
.656
.629
803
599
581
579
505
1,656
666
655
394
558
453
908
355
815
346
338
235
778
230
192
187
181
180
1,693
1.662
1.656
1.656
163
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.556
.555
.527
.526
.329
.324
.316
.316
.311
.415
.316
.316
.311
.153
.114
.111
.110
.096
.316
.127
.125
.075
.106
.086
.173
.067
.155
.066
.064
.044
.148
.043
.036
.035
.034
.034
.323
.317
.316
.316
.031
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
10
07
07
03
07
03
07
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
01
01
01
01
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
5.569
5.557
3.693
3.684
3.290
3.247
3.163
3.163
3.112
2.910
2.214
2.214
2.178
1.534
1 .144
1.110
1.106
.964
.949
.890
.876
.752
.746
.605
.520
.474
.467
.462
.452
.448
.445
.439
.366
.357
.345
.343
.323
.317
.316
.316
.311
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3511 TURBINES AND TURBINE GENERATOR SETS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
5,234 5
IHFOM
CODE
1980
9210
0290
1060
1591
1591
1660
0867
0570
0874
0170
2540
0686
_ 0760
•f 2532
M 9030
-J 0374
<* 2170
C0320
2611
0540
1280
2037
C9020
0686
2020
1430
0220
0686
1018
I860
0686
1280
C0260
1591
1591
0020
159.1
2432
NOHS
CODE
81651
94220
90320
31500
M0125
M0126
45930
24003
17490
24130
05250
74990
81876
20380
82880
71055
80517
M0256
09070
77150
17370
81945
M0630
90310
M0900
54790
38580
06580
80064
M0347
50742
M0063
33595
07555
84546
M0751
01568
80252
73253
OZONE
MOODS
ASPHALT
ETHYL ALCOHOL
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
METHANOL
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2-
Ar.MONIA
TURPENTINE
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2*) SALT (1:1)
CRESOL
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
TALC
SODIUM BORATE
PROPANOL, 1-
BEHZENE
ZINC CHLORIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
ASBESTOS
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04). ZINC SALT (1:1)
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ANILINE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
NITRIC ACID
INORGANIC CHROMATES
FLUORSPAR
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
LEADED ZIHC OXIDE
ACETIC ACID
LEAD CARBONATE
TIN OXIDES
234 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3511
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1.629
160
159
508
147
147
209
144
142
142
200
197
137
136
191
189
174
121
120
120
116
116
112
111
109
154
146
131
84
83
83
82
77
71
71
69
98
69
96
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.311
.030
.030
.097
.028
.028
.039
.027
.027
.027
.038
.037
.026
.025
.036
.036
.033
.023
.022
.022
.022
.022
.021
.021
.020
.029
.027
.025
.016
.015
.015
.015
.014
.013
.013
.013
.018
.013
.018
HAZARD
HEIGHT
01
10
10
03
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.311
.305
.303
.291
.280
.280
.279
.275
.271
.271
.267
.263
.261
.259
.255
.252
.232
.231
.229
.229
.221
.221
.213
.212
.208
.205
.195
.175
.160
.158
.158
.156
.147
.135
.135
.131
.131
.131
.128
OTHER TOTALS:
62.996
11.921
75.016
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND AHALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
SPECIAt DIES. TOOLS. JIGS < FIXTURES
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,808
37
IHFOrt
CODE
5010
1591
0230
0230
9050
2229
2620
5010
2590
2460
0490
1842
2037
0160
1060
1060
1660
2490
1018
1520
0686
1030
2040
1720
2537
0020
C0320
1591
0374
1591
1591
2532
2080
0360
1631
2420
0570
0874
0760
0867
0220
NOHS
CODE
52131
42490
07310
A1433
84055
M1463
M0626
52138
76720
73300
15630
50495
M2829
20265
31500
M0238
45930
73790
M6347
40297
81876
04980
55460
46970
A1003
01568
09070
83453
80517
42685
91160
82880
57740
11855
45315
72085
17490
24130
20380
24003
06580
OIL. CUTTING
LEAD
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDE, RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
OIL. LUBE
XYLEHE
TOLUENE
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ALCOHOL
METHANOL
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS<2-
IRON OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2») SALT (1 = 1)
ETHANOLAMINE
PHENOL
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ACETIC ACID
BENZENE
LEAD MAPHTHENATE
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD OXIDES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
PHOSPHINE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DICIILOROETHAHE. 1.2-
CRESOL
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
ANILINE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
823
567
534
532
728
577
536
353
395
350
242
240
224
742
676
641
267
267
183
257
172
569
165
234
202
191
133
117
161
111
99
139
95
92
92
92
85
85
84
81
115
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.455
.313
.295
.294
.402
.319
.296
.195
.218
.193
.133
.132
.123
.410
.373
.354
.147
.147
.101
.142
.095
.314
.091
.129
.111
.105
.073
.064
.089
.061
.054
.076
.052
.050
.050
.050
.047
.047
. 046
. 044
.063
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
03
03
03
07
07
10
07
10
03
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
4.551
3.136
2.953
2.942
2.818
2.233
2.075
.952
.529
.355
.338
.327
.238
.231
.121
.063
1.033
1.033
1.012
.995
.951
.944
.912
.905
.782
.739
.735
.647
.623
.613
.547
.538
.525
.508
.508
.508
.470
.470
.464
.448
.445
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED- —
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
SPECIAL DIES, TOOLS, JIGS < FIXTURES
DESCRIPTION
1.804
37
IHFOM
CODE
0527
2540
1290
1520
2170
2037
0540
2020
0560
2570
1620
9090
^ 2000
7 0460
M 0440
-J 0686
00 2611
1860
0170
1970
0720
0686
0686
1375
1767
1842
0926
1913
9210
1779
0820
2260
9030
0230
0522
2537
1790
1591
1591
NOHS
CODE
80243
74990
33640
80990
M0256
M0630
17370
54790
17460
A1010
44035
17366
H0600
13850
14380
60370
77150
50742
05250
52480
19770
80064
M0900
83899
84547
84269
27615
32385
94220
48535
21560
69070
71055
07405
15800
74980
48628
M0751
M1693
CARBON
TURPENTINE
FORMALDEHYDE
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
PROPANOL, 1-
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CARBON MONOXIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
GRAPHITE
PARAFFIN
BUTANOL
BUTYL ACETATE
POTASSIUM CHROMATE
ZINC CHLORIDE
NITRIC ACID
AMMONIA
OXALIC ACID
COBALT
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
HEXAFLUOROACETONE
METHYLCYCLOPENTADIENYL MANGANESE TRICARBONYL
NICKEL OXIDE
DIPHENYLAMINE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
WOODS
MICA
CYCLOHEXANOL
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
TALC
ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE
CAMPHOR
TUNGSTEN
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
LEAD SOAP
254 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3544
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
80
114
78
107
74
74
74
102
95
92
92
90
62
598
598
55
55
52
70
48
47
47
41
125
125
36
116
34
34
45
104
304
43
30
40
40
92
27
27
22.296
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.044
.063
.043
.059
.040
.040
.040
.056
.052
.050
.050
.049
.034
.330
.330
.030
.030
.028
.038
.026
.025
.025
.022
.069
.069
.019
.064
.018
.018
.024
.057
.168
.023
.016
.022
.022
.050
.014
.014
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
16
01
01
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
03
03
10
03
10
10
07
03
01
07
10
07
07
03
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.442
.441
.431
.414
.409
.409
.409
.394
.367
.356
.356
.348
.342
.330
.330
.304
.304
.287
.271
.265
.259
.259
.226
.207
.207
.199
.192
.188
.188
.174
.172
.168
.166
.165
.154
.154
.152
.149
.149
12.197
67.855
-------
SIC
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.010
12
IHFOM
CODE
0230
0230
1591
5010
9050
2620
2229
5010
1591
0160
2490
0490
1842
2532
1520
2537
1030
1060
0926
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2037
1720
0310
0686
2611
0686
1591
1060
0374
1560
2260
9010
9090
9030
I860
2090
NOHS
CODE
A1433
07310
42490
52131
84055
M0626
M1463
52138
83453
20265
73790
15630
50495
82980
40297
A1003
04980
M0238
27615
42685
M0125
M0126
81000
81677
84544
M2829
46970
M2929
M0063
77150
80064
91160
31500
80517
40987
69070
67915
17366
71055
50742
81650
DESCRIPTION
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD
OIL, CUTTING
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDE, RED
OIL, LUBE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ETHANOLAMINE
ALCOHOL
DIPHENYLAMINE
LEAD OXIDES
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1-
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
ZIHC CHLORIDE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
ETHYL ALCOHOL
SODIUM BORATE
I50PROPYL ALCOHOL
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
SAND
GRAPHITE
TALC
NITRIC ACID
PHOSPHORUS
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
825
825
825
639
864
826
826
445
291
832
314
211
209
290
210
209
279
278
271
55
45
45
45
45
45
40
51
271
19
19
19
19
63
27
149
146
20
19
19
13
13
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.816
.816
.816
.632
.855
.817
.817
.440
.288
.823
.310
.208
.206
.287
.207
.206
.276
.275
.268
.054
.044
.044
.044
.044
.044
.039
.050
.268
.018
.018
.018
.018
.062
.026
.147
.144
.019
.018
.018
.012
.012
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
03
07
10
10
07
07
07
03
03
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
01
10
10
10
10
03
07
01
01
07
07
07
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
8.168
8.168
8.168
6.326
5.988
5.724
5.724
4.405
2.881
2.471
2.176
2.089
2.069
2.009
1.455
1.448
.828
.825
.804
.544
.445
.445
.445
.445
.445
.396
.353
.268
.188
.188
.108
.188
.187
.187
.147
.144
.1)8
.131
.131
. 128
. 128
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY bY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—-NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3545
MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES
1.010
12
IHFOM
CODE
C9020
2432
2432
2432
1660
0360
1631
2420
0020
1430
0686
0720
2570
^ 1620
1 2590
M 0686
°? 0570
0 0670
1460
2080
1280
1790
2020
2310
2000
C0260
0686
1591
0290
0220
0460
0440
0560
1520
0933
2170
1913
1290
1790
NOHS
CODE
90310
73253
M0877
82157
45930
11855
45315
72085
01568
38580
19360
84330
A1010
44035
76720
M0900
17490
18500
38550
57740
81945
80056
54790
70870
M0600
07555
81876
84546
90320
06580
13850
14380
17460
80990
81806
M0256
32385
33640
48628
DESCRIPTION
ASBESTOS
TIN OXIDES
STANNIC OXIDE
STANNOUS OXIDE
METHANOL
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
ACETIC ACID
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
CHROMIC ACID
COBALTOUS NITRATE
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
XYLEHE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
PHOSPHINE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
SULFURIC ACID
PARAFFIN
ARSENIC OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2*> SALT (1:1)
LEAD SULFATE
ASPHALT
ANILINE
BUTANOL
BUTYL ACETATE
CARBON MONOXIDE
IRON OXIDE. YELLOU
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
PROPANOL. 1-
EfHYLENE GLYCOL
FORMALDEHYDE
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
154 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3545
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
13
18
17
17
15
10
10
10
13
12
8
A
10
10
10
1
5
5
5
5
5
7
48
48
6
6
13
3
3
3
10
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.012
.017
.016
.016
.014
.009
.009
.009
.012
.011
.007
.007
.009
.009
.009
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.018
.007
.007
.004
.004
.004
.004
.004
.006
.047
.047
.005
.005
.012
.002
.002
.002
.009
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
01
01
07
07
03
10
10
10
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX '
.128
.124
.117 '
.117
.103
.099
.099 •
.099
.090
.083
.079
.079
.069
.069
.069 •
.059
.059
.059
.059
.059
.059
.056
.055
.055
.049
.049
.049
.049
.049
.048
.047
.047
.041
.041
.038
.029
.029
.029
.029
OTHER TOTALS:
11.401
11.156
80.710
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3559 SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY. NEC.
DESCRIPTION
427
>
1
t— •
OO
I-1
IHFOM
CODE
1591
0230
0230
5010
9050
2229
2620
2037
5010
0490
1842
2611
1520
1591
2080
0374
2490
0160
1720
2537
9090
0686
1591
0360
0874
1631
2420
0290
C0260
1591
2532
1060
06S6
0560
1591
2000
2590
0220
2460
2570
1620
NOHS
CODE
42490
A1433
07310
52131
84055
M1463
M0626
M2829
52138
15630
50495
77150
40297
4268$
57740
80517
73790
20265
46970
A1003
17366
81876
91160
11855
24130
45315
72085
90320
07555
84546
82880
M0238
M0063
17460
83453
M0600
76720
06560
73JOO
A1010
440J5
LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
OIL, CUTTING
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDE. RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
OIL. LUBE
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
ZINC CHLORIDE
IROII OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
SODIUM BORATE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TRICHLOROETHAHE. 1,1.1-
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
GRAPHITE
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2») SALT (1:1)
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
MERCURY OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
ASPHALT
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
ALCOHOL
INORGANIC CHROMATES
CARBON MONOXIDE
LEAD NAPHTHEHATE
PARAFFIN
XYLENE
ANILINE
TOLUENF.
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANLSE OXIDES
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
128
127
127
118
149
135
130
76
60
57
57
57
65
45
44
60
59
137
57
55
53
36
36
34
34
34
34
34
33
33
47
107
31
44
28
27
37
36
35
3<.
34
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.299
.297
.297
.276
.348
.316
.304
.177
.140
.133
.133
.133
.152
.105
.103
.140
.138
.320
.133
.128
.124
.084
.084
.079
.079
.079
.079
.079
.077
.077
.110
.250
.072
.103
.065
.063
.086
.084
.081
.079
.079
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
07
03
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
2.997
2.974
2.974
2.763
2.442
2.213
2.131
.779
.405
.334
.334
.334
.065
.053
.030
.983
.967
.962
.934
.901
.868
.843
.843
.796
.796
.796
.796
.796
.772
.772
.770
.751
.725
.721
.655
.632
.606
.590
.573
.557
.557
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3559
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, NEC.
DESCRIPTION
427
>
1
1— '
00
K>
IHFOM
CODE
1030
9030
0686
C0320
0686
0170
1060
2540
1520
1010
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
9050
0570
1430
0867
2170
2037
0540
0760
1790
2432
1660
0527
2432
2432
12«0
2020
2240
9210
1790
1970
1842
I860
0926
NOHS
CODE
04980
71055
M0900
09070
80064
05250
31500
74990
80990
25145
M1693
M0125
M0126
81000
81677
84544
M1532
17490
38580
24003
M0256
M0630
17370
20380
80056
73253
45930
80243
M0877
82157
81945
54790
68748
94220
48628
52480
84269
50742
27615
ETHANOLAMINE
TALC
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04). ZINC SALT (1:1)
BENZENE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
AMMONIA
ETHYL ALCOHOL
TURPENTINE
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
DIOXANE, 1,4-
LEAD SOAP
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
SILICA GEL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
DICHLOROBEHZENE, ORTHO-
PROP ANOL. 1-
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
CRESOL
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
TIN OXIDES
METHANOL
CARBON
STANNIC OXIDE
STANNOUS OXIDE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
SILVER OXIDES
WOODS
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
OXALIC ACID
NICKEL OXIDE
NITRIC ACID
DIPHENYLAMINE
211 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3559
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
77
33
23
23
22
31
71
29
29
20
19
18
18
IB
18
18
25
17
23
16
15
15
15
15
50
21
20
13
18
18
12
17
16
11
34
10
10
9
28
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.180
.077
.053
.053
.051
.072
.166
.067
.067
.046
.044
.042
.042
.042
.042
.042
.058
.039
.053
.037
.035
.035
.035
.035
.117
.049
.046
.030
.042
.042
.028
.039
.037
.025
.079
.023
.023
.021
.065
HAZARD
WEIGHT
03
07
10
10
10
07
03
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
10
07
07
10
07
07
10
03
10
10
10
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.540
.540
.538
.538
.515
.508
.498
.475
.475
.468
.444
.421
.421
.421
.421
.421
.409
.398
.377
.374
.351
.351
.351
.351
.351
.344
.327
.304
.295
.295
.281
.278
.262
.257
.238
.234
.234
.210
.196
OTHER TOTALS'
4.807
11.175
69.973
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3561 PUMPS AND PUMPING EQUIPMENT
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7,903
11
IHFOM
CODE
9050
5010
2229
0867
1290
0868
1190
1369
2590
0374
2460
1520
1591
9090
> 2611
' 0020
Ł 1»«
w 2490
1591
0230
0490
1591
0686
1430
0230
2532
C9020
9010
5010
1310
9030
1340
1591
2037
0686
1190
2090
1460
2620
25J7
2360
NOHS
CODE
84055
52138
M1463
24003
33640
24006
A1719
35960
76720
80517
73300
40297
83453
17366
77150
01568
50495
73790
42490
07310
15630
91160
M0063
38580
A1433
82880
90310
67915
52131
33720
71055
90880
42685
M2829
80064
32550
81650
58550
MD626
A1003
71640
DESCRIPTION
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
OIL, LUBE
IRON OXIDE. RED
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
FORMALDEHYDE
DICIILOROBENZENE. PARA-
ETHYLEHE OXIDE CONDENSATE
HEPTACHLOR
XYLENE
SODIUM BORATE
TOLUENE
IKON OXIDES
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
GRAPHITE
ZINC CHLORIDE
ACETIC ACID
NICKEL OXIDES
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
LEAD
ANTIMONY
CADMIUM OXIDES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
INORGANIC CHROMATES
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ASBESTOS
SAND
OIL, CUTTING
FORMIC ACID
TALC
GASOLINE-LEADED
LEAD OXIDES
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
ETHYLEME OXIDE
PHOSPHORUS
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IllNGSTEM OXIDES
TEIRAETHYL LEAD
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
3,894
2,595
3,104
1,861
1,731
1,563
1,545
1,545
2.187
2,114
2,073
,973
,339
.866
,269
.781
,246
,777
,239
.237
,235
,186
,174
,654
,143
,626
,129
,572
.094
,547
,543
,063
,015
.004
965
884
868
862
.154
. 105
.063
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.492
.328
.392
.235
.219
.197
.195
.195
.276
.267
.262
.249
.169
.236
.160
.225
.157
.224
.156
.156
.156
.150
.148
.209
.144
.205
.142
.198
.138
.195
.195
.134
.128
.127
.122
.111
. 109
. 109
.146
. 159
. 154
HAZARD WEIGHTED
UEIGHT INDEX
07 3.449
10 3.283
07 2.749
10 2.354
10 2.190
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
.977
.954
.954
.937
.872
.836
.747
.694
.652
.605
.577
.576
.573
.567
.565
.562
.500
.485
.465
.446
.440
.428
.392
.384
.370
.366
.345
.284
.270
.221
118
.098
.090
.022
07 .978
07 .941
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3561PUMPS AND PUMPING EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION
-—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7,903
11
IHFOM
CODE
2370
9010
0160
1060
1620
1060
0290
1520
1631
2080
0577
0560
1520
> 1520
I 0360
Ł 2420
2 0760
1660
9210
0686
2000
1620
1790
1720
0874
2570
0926
1591
1591
1913
1591
0933
0527
1620
1620
1536
1842
1591
C0320
NOHS
CODE
71860
M1806
20265
31500
44035
M0238
90320
80990
45315
57740
17695
17460
70131
M0130
11855
72085
20380
45930
94220
19430
M0600
44030
80056
46970
24130
A1010
27615
M0125
M0126
32385
MI693
81806
80243
M1634
81664
40430
50420
M0751
09070
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
SILICA FLOUR
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
MANGANESE OXIDES
ALCOHOL
ASPHALT
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
MERCURY OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
CEMENT-PORTLAND
CARBON MONOXIDE
IRON OXIDE (FE304)
FERROUS OXIDE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
CRESOL
METHANOL
WOODS
CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE
PARAFFIN
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1,1-
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
VAHADIUM OXIDES
DIPHENYLAMINE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
LEAD SOAP
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
CARBON
MANGANOUS OXIDE
MANGANESE OXIDE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
NICKEL
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
BENZENE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1,063
1.051
2.301
2.276
965
2,203
648
912
630
624
878
846
842
830
578
578
540
738
497
463
459
642
1,439
596
408
578
1,306
386
382
377
370
1,223
337
463
463
300
290
285
271
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.134
.132
.291
.287
.122
.278
.081
.115
.079
.078
.111
.107
.106
.105
.073
.073
.068
.093
.062
.058
.058
.081
.182
.075
.051
.073
.165
.048
.048
.047
.046
.154
.042
.058
.058
.037
.036
.036
.034
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
03
03
07
03
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
03
07
10
07
03
10
10
10
10
03
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.941
.930
.873
.863
.854
.836
.819
.807
.797
.789
.777
.749
.745
.735
.731
.731
.683
.653
.628
.585
.580
.568
.546
.527
.516
.511
.495
.488
.483
.477
.468
.464
.426
.410
.410
.379
.366
.360
.342
296 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3561
OTHER TOTALS'
144.077
18.097
106.612
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3569 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, NEC.
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
IHFOM
CODE
2080
0490
1842
0560
1520
1591
2537
203?
9050
1631
1591
5010
0360
> 2420
I 2590
•- 2490
5 18«2
0527
2460
5010
2570
1620
2229
2000
0230
0230
1591
2532
0686
9090
0170
0374
2620
1720
1018
C2580
1860
2611
1060
14)0
0160
NOHS
CODE
57740
15630
50495
17460
4029?
42490
A1003
M2829
84055
45315
42685
52131
11855
72085
76720
73790
84269
80243
73300
52138
A1010
44035
M1463
M0600
A1433
07310
83453
82880
81876
17366
05250
8051?
M0626
46970
M0347
76445
50742
77150
31500
38580
20265
PHOSPHINE
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
IRON OXIDES
LEAD
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
MERCURY OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
OIL, CUTTING
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
XYLENE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
NICKEL OXIDE
CARBON
TOLUENE
OIL, LUBE
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
IRON OXIDE, RED
PARAFFIN
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
GRAPHITE
AMMONIA
SODIUM BORATE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
TRICHLOROETHAHE, 1,1,1-
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
VINYL CHLORIDE
NITRIC ACID
ZINC CHLORIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
ALUMIN'IM OXIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
329
293
293
333
304
209
280
182
221
144
138
137
129
129
181
167
115
112
154
92
129
129
123
85
77
77
72
92
59
81
79
79
77
76
53
49
48
48
159
65
150
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.178
.158
.158
.180
.164
.113
.151
.098
.119
.078
.074
.074
.069
.069
.098
.090
.062
.060
.083
.049
.069
.069
.066
.046
.041
.041
.039
.049
.031
.043
.042
.042
.041
.041
.028
.026
.026
.026
.086
.035
.081
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
03
07
03
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3569 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, NEC.
DESCRIPTION
IHFOM
CODE
0874
1913
1460
1660
1790
1591
1060
0570
2310
9030
1680
0490
1190
> 1280
1 1280
*-• 2577
S 0530
0640
1591
0686
2020
1980
1290
1270
1340
1480
2540
1591
1591
1710
0020
0270
0391
0862
1420
1643
1903
2070
2040
NOHS
CODE
24130
32385
38550
45930
48628
M1693
M0238
17490
70870
71055
h0420
15570
32550
81734
81932
84575
17367
18040
M0126
M0900
54790
81651
33640
33370
90883
38620
74990
83436
M0125
M0421
01568
07580
13103
23650
38575
45850
50A70
57710
55460
DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
METHANOL
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
LEAD SOAP
ALCOHOL
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
SULFURIC ACID
TALC
BROMOMETHANE
CADMIUM
ETHYLENE OXIDE
BROMINE TRIFLUORIDE
PHOSPHORUS PENTAFLUORIDE
VINYL BROMIDE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CHLORINE
LEAD TETROXIDE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
OZONE
FORMALDEHYDE
FLUORINE
GASOLINE. LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
HYDROGEN SULFIDE
TURPENTINE
LEAD PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC
LEAD MONOXIDE
CHLOROMETHANE
ACETIC ACID
ARSIHE
BROMINE PENTAFLUORIDE
DIBOP.ANEU)
HYDROGEN BROMIDE
METHYL MERCAPTAH
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
PHOSGENE
PHEHOL
252 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3569
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
45
42
42
59
129
38
123
37
49
49
34
34
34
34
34
34
334
47
31
31
42
295
29
39
27
38
38
25
24
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
23
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.024
.022
.022
.031
.069
.020
.066
.020
.026
.026
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.181
.025
.016
.016
.022
.159
.015
.021
.014
.020
.020
.013
.013
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.012
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
10
07
03
10
03
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
07
10
10
07
01
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
OTHER TOTALS:
12,458
6.623
.244
.227
.227
.223
.209
.206
.200
.200
.186
.186
.184
.184
.184
.184
.184
.184
.181
.178
.168
.168
.159
.159
.157
.148
.146
.144
.144
.135
.130
.129
.129
.129
.129
.129
.129
.129
.129
.129
.124
38.284
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
573 ELECTRONIC COMPUTING EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION
--- NOHS SURVEYED ---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3.
>
1
(— '
00
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2037
1720
2432
2432
2432
2490
2000
1060
2532
0290
5010
1591
9090
2590
0874
2460
1591
C0320
5010
C9020
1010
2020
0686
1591"
2611
9050
0570
C0260
1591
1941
1970
1536
ioia
22,27
1560
NOHS
CODE
M0125
M0126
42685
81000
81677
84544
M2829
46970
73253
M0877
82157
73790
M0600
31500
82880
90320
52138
M1693
17366
76720
24130
73300
83453
09070
52131
90310
25145
54790
81876
91160
77150
84055
17490
07555
84546
51090
52480
40430
M0147
80172
40987
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD OXIDES
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
TIN OXIDES
STANNIC OXIDE
STANNOUS OXIDE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
PARAFFIN
ETHYL ALCOHOL
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ASPHALT
OIL, LUBE
LEAD SOAP
GRAPHITE
XYLENE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
TOLUEHE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
BENZENE
OIL, CUTTING
ASBESTOS
DIOXANE, 1.4-
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+> SALT (1:1)
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
ZINC CHLORIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
NITROPROPANE, 2-
OXAl1C ACID
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
E1HYIHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BI5(2-
PRODUCfS OF ROSIN CORE SOLDER
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
643
643
631
615
615
615
593
723
625
615
615
477
328
1,052
441
307
298
288
406
406
282
345
234
216
212
209
194
241
168
168
162
225
152
140
140
131
125
121
120
1.161
1.151
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.163
.163
.159
.155
.155
.155
.150
.183
.158
.155
.155
.120
.083
.266
.111
.077
.075
.073
.102
.102
.071
.087
.059
.054
.053
.052
.049
.061
.042
.042
.041
.057
.038
.035
.035
.033
.031
.030
.0)0
.294
.291
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
10
03
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.630
.630
.599
.559
.559
.559
.503
.283
.109
.091
.091
.846
.831
.800
.782
.778
.755
.730
.720
.720
.715
.612
.593
.547
.537
.529
.491
.427
.425
.425
.410
.399
.385
.354
.354
.332
. 316
. 306
.304
.294
.291
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
-—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3573 ELECTRONIC COMPUTING EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION
3,944
1
t->
00
00
IHFOM
CODE
2229
9210
1790
1430
0686
1290
0435
0760
0720
1842
1060
0374
I860
9030
2310
1040
0527
0926
1591
0020
0430
0860
1913
2570
1030
1620
2223
0490
0686
0230
0230
1631
0170
1660
0160
2540
0040
2620
0686
NOHS
COPE
M1461
94220
80056
38580
M0063
33640
29930
20380
19770
50420
M023A
80517
50742
71055
70870
31470
80243
27615
42490
01568
13980
M4016
32385
M1727
04980
44030
67405
15630
80064
A1433
07310
45315
05250
45930
20265
74990
02820
H0626
M0900
IRON OXIDE, RED
WOODS
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
FORMALDEHYDE
ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY-
CRESOL
COBALT
NICKEL
ALCOHOL
SODIUM BORATE
NITRIC ACID
TALC
SULFURIC ACID
ETHYL ACETATE
CARBON
DIPHENYLAMINE
LEAD
ACETIC ACID
BUTANONE, 2-
PEM1ANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
VANADIUM OXIDE
ETHAHOLAMINE
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
RHODIUM
CAPMIUM OXIDES
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
MERCURY OXIDES
AMMONIA
METHANOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
TURPENTINE
ACF.TOHE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
222 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3573
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
153
107
348
139
89
87
841
79
77
77
242
101
69
95
93
633
62
203
61
86
599
197
59
77
179
77
77
53
53
52
52
52
70
67
154
65
453
62
43
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.038
.027
.088
.035
.022
.022
.213
.020
.019
.019
.061
.025
.017
.024
.023
.160
.015
.051
.015
.021
.151
.049
.014
.019
.045
.019
.019
.013
.013
.013
.013
.013
.017
.016
.039
.016
.114
.015
.010
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
10
03
07
10
10
01
10
10
10
03
07
10
07
07
01
10
03
10
07
01
03
10
07
03
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
03
07
01
07
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.271
.271
.264
.246
.225
.220
.213
.200
.195
.195
.184
.179
.174
.168
.165
.160
.157
.154
.154
.152
.151
.149
.149
.136
.136
.136
.136
.134
.134
.131
.131
.131
.124
.118
.117
.115
.114
.110
.109
OTHER TOTALS:
31,663
7.913
42.584
-------
•1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
699 MACHINERY, EXCEPT ELECTRICAL, NEC.
DESCRIPTION
2,299
39
IHFOM
CODE
5010
5010
1842
0490
9050
0230
1591
2037
0230
1591
1520
2537
2490
> 2229
' 2*20
w 1591
vo 2532
2590
2080
1631
0360
2420
2020
2611
0874
0220
1591
C0320
0160
0686'
1720
0570
0867
0686
0686
0760
2170
20J7
05
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3599 MACHINERY, EXCEPT ELECTRICAL, NEC.
0686
' 0290
Ł C0260
o 1591
1790
2000
9050
1790
0860
0620
0820
0830
2190
0924
0440
0460
1591
1591
0310
1560
1-591
9010
0577
0730
1730
1010
NOHS
CODE
04980
17460
73300
31500
71055
A1010
44035
80990
M0238
45930
74990
27615
80243
81876
90320
07555
84546
80056
M0600
M1532
48628
M4016
18190
21560
21660
24390
25820
14380
13850
MO 125
M0126
M2929
40987
M1693
67915
17695
20170
47270
25145
ETHANOLAMINE
CARBON MONOXIDE
TOLUENE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
TALC
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
IRON OXIDE, YELLOU
ALCOHOL
HETHAHOL
TURPENTINE
DIPHFNYLAMINE
CARBON
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
ASPHALT
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
PAKAFFIN
SILICA GEL
MOLYBDENUM OXIDES
PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
CHLOROBENZENE
CYCLOUEXANOL
CYCLOHEXANONE
DICHLOROPROPANE, 1,2-
DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANOHE. 2,6-
BUTYL ACETATE
BUTANOL
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
LEAD SOAP
SAND
CEMENT-PORTLAND
COPPER OXIDES
DICMLOROUETHANE
D10XAHE. 1,4-
269 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3599
EXPOSURE
•FACTOR
533
225
223
505
212
209
209
198
446
189
180
343
102
91
81
71
71
220
65
92
209
198
175
175
175
175
175
470
464
45
45
401
375
36
51
49
316
314
2fl
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.231
.097
.096
.219
.092
.090
.090
.086
.193
.082
.078
.149
.044
.039
.035
.030
.030
.095
.028
.040
.090
.086
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.204
.201
.019
.019
.174
.163
.015
.022
.021
.137
.136
.012
HAZARD
WEIGHT
03
07
07
03
07
07
07
07
03
07
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
03
10
07
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
01
01
10
10
01
01
10
07
07
01
01
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.695
.685
.678
.658
.645
.636
.636
.602
.581
.575
.548
.447
.443
.395
.352
.308
.308
.287
.282
.280
.272
.258
.228
.228
.228
.228
.228
.204
.201
.195
.195
.174
.163
.156
.155
.149
.137
.136
.121
OTHER TOTALS:
29,062
12.507
73.365
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3652 PHONOGRAPH RECORDS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
36
IHFOM
CODE
C0120
C2580
2583
2577
0290
2170
2037
1913
9050
0870
2280
2572
2582
1620
0170
0560
1903
2460
9090
0230
0230
0490
1591
1842
9210
1060
1060
1953
25J7
2620
2229
1520
0686
1460
1860
5010
1840
06C6
Olf>0
0790
2240
NOHS
CODE
03800
76445
83011
84575
90320
M0256
M2829
32385
84055
03350
70130
76420
76510
M0921
05250
17460
50870
73300
17366
A1433
07310
15630
42490
50495
94220
M0238
31500
51118
A1003
M0626
M1463
40297
19360
38550
50742
52138
81904
90570
20T65
M0052
M0105
DESCRIPTION
1.1-
FUSED
1,2-
ACRYLONITRILE
VINYL CHLORIDE
DICHLOROETHYLENE,
VINYL BROMIDE
ASPHALT
PROPANOL. 1-
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
SILICA, AMORPHOUS
DICHLOROETHYLENE,
STYRENE
VINYL ACETATE
V1MYLTOLUENE
MANGANESE DRIER
AMMONIA
CARBON MONOXIDE
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
TOLUENE
GRAPHITE
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
CADMIUM OXIDES
LEAD
NICKEL OXIDES
WOODS
ALCOHOL
ETHYL ALCOHOL
NITROUS OXIDE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDE. RED
IRON OXIDES
CHROMIC ACID
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
NI1RIC ACID
OIL, LUDE
NICKEL SALTS
CHROMOUS SALTS
ALUMINUM OXIDE
INORGANIC CYANIDES
1HU1GUI1C SILVER COMPOUNDS
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
42
42
42
42
7
5
5
5
7
42
42
42
42
5
5
5
5
5
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1.166
1.166
1.166
1.166
.194
.138
.138
.138
.194
1.166
1.166
1.166
1.166
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.083
.055
.055
.055
.055
.055
.055
.138
.138
.138
.055
.055
.055
.055
.027
.027
.027
.027
.027
.027
.083
.027
027
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
01
01
01
01
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
03
03
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
WEIGHTE
INDEX
1 .666
1 .666
1 .666
1 .666
.944
.388
.388
.388
.361
.166
.166
.166
.166
.972
.972
.972
.972
.972
.583
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.555
.416
.416
.416
.368
.388
.388
.388
.277
.277
.277
.277
.277
.277
.249
. 194
19<,
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3652 PHONOGRAPH RECORDS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
36 1
>
1
1— •
^o
NJ
IHFOM
CODE
9010
0020
1430
1779
2310
9030
0515
1170
2085
0933
0710
0430
0530
0435
1033
1540
1560
1730
1A90
I960
0070
1568
2430
2140
2260
NOHS
CODE4
M1806
01568
38580
48535
70870
71055
15743
46935
58520
81806
M0628
13980
17367
29930
31350
40984
40987
47270
50745
81651
03298
41775
M0120
60440
69070
DESCRIPTION
SILICA FLOUR
ACETIC ACID
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
MICA
SULFURIC ACID
TALC
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
NAPHTHA
BUTANONE, 2-
CARBON DIOXIDE
ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY-
ETHOXYETHANOL, 2-
ISOPROPYL ACETATE
ISOPP.OPYL ALCOHOL
DICHLOROMETHANE
NITRIC OXIDE
OZONE
ACETYLENE
KAOLIN
INORGANIC TIN COMPOUNDS
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
2
6
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
1
1
1
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.027
.027
.027
.027
.027
.027
.166
.055
.166
.055
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.055
.055
.027
.027
.027
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
07
07
07
07
01
03
01
03
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.194
.194
.194
.194
.194
.194
.166
.166
.166
.166
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.138
.055
.055
.027
.027
.027
MI»ST*NCFS FOR SIC 3652
OTHER TOTALS:
518
14.341
76.068
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALIH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3662 RADIO AND TV COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
01L, CUTTING
ZINC CHLORIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
TOLUEllE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
XYLENE
TR1CHLOROETHANE, 1.1,1-
LEAD
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
ASPHALT
METHANOL
LEAD OXIDES
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
GRAPHITE
LEAD MONOXIDE
CARBON
ANTIMONY
ALCOHOL
LEAD TETROXIDE
CRESOL
DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO-
LEAD DIOXIDE
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
TURPENTINE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TIN OXIDES
STANNIC OXIDE
STAHIIOUS OXIDE
SULFURIC ACID
SODIUM BORATE
BENZENE
IRON OXIDE, RED
PROPAIIOL, 1-
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
8,359
18
IHFOM
CODE
2037
2490
5010
2611
1430
2460
9050
0874
2590
1720
1591
0570
1913
> 0290
I 1660
Ł 1591
Ł 1280
9090
1591
0527
0230
1060
1591
0760
0867
1591
0230
1591
1591
1060
2540
2020
2432
2432
2432
2310
0374
COJ20
2229
2170
2620
NOHS
CODE
M2829
73790
52131
77150
38580
73300
84055
24130
76720
46970
42490
17490
32385
90320
45930
42685
81945
17366
M0125
80243
07310
M0238
M0126
20380
24003
84544
A1433
81000
81677
31500
74990
54770
73253
M0877
82157
70370
80517
09070
MI463
N0256
M0626
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
742
921
531
519
576
556
535
372
530
498
316
313
313
313
436
299
298
419
288
288
280
926
275
274
274
268
265
255
255
849
355
348
341
335
335
328
325
220
314
213
271
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.088
.110
.063
.062
.068
.066
.064
.044
.063
.059
.037
.037
.037
.037
.052
.035
.035
.050
.034
.034
.033
.110
.032
.032
.032
.032
.031
.030
.030
.101
.042
.041
.040
.040
.040
.039
.038
.026
.037
.026
.032
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.887
.771
.635
.620
.482
.465
.448
.445
.443
.417
.378
.374
.374
.374
.365
.357
.356
.350
.344
.344
.334
.332
.328
.327
.327
.320
.317
.305
.305
.304
.297
.291
.285
.280
.280
.274
.272
.263
.262
.260
.226
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3662 RADIO AND TV COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION
-—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
8.359
18
IHFOM
CODE
1860
5010
0170
1030
2037
0540
2000
1560
C9020
9210
1290
1018
0160
> 2040
' 0220
Ł 1536
*i 2532
0720
0686
1842
9030
2227
1970
2495
0686
0686
0020
1620
1591
2570
1460
2223
1591
1591
1620
0490
0522
0550
0686
NOHS
CODE
50742
52138
05250
04980
M0630
17370
M0600
40987
90310
94220
33640
M0347
20265
55460
06580
40430
82880
19770
19430
50420
71055
80172
52480
73770
80064
19360
01568
44030
83453
M1727
38550
67405
M1693
91160
M0921
15630
15800
21660
61876
NITRIC ACID
OIL, LUBE
AMMONIA
ETHANOLAMINE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
PARAFFIN
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
ASBESTOS
MOODS
FORMALDEHYDE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
ALUMINUM OXIDE
PHENOL
ANILINE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
COBALT
CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE
NICKEL
TALC
PRODUCTS OF ROSIN CORE SOLDER
OXALIC ACID
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1,2-
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
CHROMIC ACID
ACETIC ACID
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
VANADIUM OXIDE
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
RHODIUM
LEAD SOAP
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
MANGANESE DRIER
CADMIUM OXIDES
CAMPHOR
CYCLOHEXAHONE
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2O SALT (1 = 1)
362 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3662
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
180
180
254
568
169
169
157
1.531
150
147
146
145
484
139
193
133
187
130
128
128
183
1,276
126
124
110
106
131
127
87
114
80
114
75
73
102
70
100
230
69
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.021
.021
.030
.067
.020
.020
.018
.183
.017
.017
.017
.017
.057
.016
.023
.015
.022
.015
.015
.015
.021
.152
.015
.014
.013
.012
.015
.015
.010
.013
.009
.013
.008
.008
.012
.008
.011
.027
.008
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
03
10
10
10
01
10
10
10
10
03
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
01
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
03
10
WEIGHTE
INDEX
.215
.215
.212
.203
.202
.202
.187
.183
.179
.175
.174
.173
.173
.166
.161
.159
.156
.155
.153
.153
.153
.152
.150
.148
.131
.126
.109
.106
.104
.095
.095
.095
.089
.087
.085
.083
.083
.082
.082
OTHER TOTALS:
41,052
4.742
26.257
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3674 SEMICONDUCTORS AND RELATED DEVICES
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
25 1
IHFOM
CODE
2432
2432
2432
2037
2611
0230
1430
1660
0230
1591
0645
1190
1290
> 2620
JL 2229
vo 9050
en 2581
0020
1720
2490
1010
5010
5010
2040
1591
0160
9010
1520
2537 ;
2532
1460
1860
2230
0926
1365
2215
0370
23JO
0310
00'. 0
0460
NOHS
CODE
73253
M0877
82157
M2829
77150
07310
38580
45930
A1433
42490
29010
32550
33640
MO 6 26
M1463
84055
M1392
01568
46970
73790
25145
52131
52138
55460
83453
20265
MUD*
40297
80230
82880
38550
50742
68295
27615
35120
63550
81729
71197
M2929
023?0
1 1850
TIN OXIDES
STANNIC OXIDE
STANNOUS OXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ZINC CHLORIDE
ANTIMONY
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
METHANOL
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
LEAD
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
ETHYLENE OXIDE
FORMALDEHYDE
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDE, RED
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
VINYL CYCLOHEXENE DIOXIDE
ACETIC ACID
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1-
ETIIYLENE. TRICHLORO-
DIOXANE, 1,4-
OIL, CUTTING
OIL, LUBE
PHENOL
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
IRONOXIDES
TUNGSTEN CARBIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
NITRIC ACID
SELENIUM
DIPHENYLAMINE
GLYCIDOL
PROPYIENE OXIDE
BISMUTH TELLURIDE
TELLURIUM
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
ACIIONE
BUIAHOL
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
54
52
52
21
14
7
10
9
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
5
5
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
6
2
2
2
2
1
1
«
i
2
5
5
5
1
2
2
2
EXPOSURE
INDEX
2.160
2.080
2.080
.840
.560
.280
.400
.360
.240
.240
.200
.200
.200
.240
.240
.240
.200
.200
.160
.160
.080
.080
.080
.080
.080
.240
.080
.080
.080
.080
.040
.040
.040
.030
.200
.200
.200
. 040
. 080
.080
.080
HAZARD
UEIGHT
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
U J
01
01
01
03
01
01
01
15.120
14.560
14.560
8.400
.600
.800
.800
5.
2.
2.
2.520
400
400
000
000
000
.680
.680
.680
.400
.400
.120
.120
.800
.800
.800
.800
.800
.720
.560
.560
.560
.560
.400
.400
.400
!200
.200
.200
. 120
.080
.080
.080
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
sic INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3674 SEMICONDUCTORS AND RELATED DEVICES
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
25 1
IHFOM
CODE
0505
0871
1560
2085
2430
1517
NOHS
CODE DESCRIPTION
15705 CALCIUM CARBONATE
24095 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
40987 ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
58520 PHOSPHORIC ACID
73075 TIN
84474 IODOFORM
47 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3674
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
2
2
2
2
2
1
344
EXPOSURE HAZARD
INDEX WEIGHT
.080
.080
.080
.080
.080
.040
13.760
01
01
01
01
01
01
UEIGHTET
INDEX
.080
.080
.080
.080
.080
1040
97.040
10
a\
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
3679 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. NEC.
DESCRIPTION
7.188
26
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2037
2310
9210
1591
0686
1591
1720
2460
2611
1430
2590
2490
5010
1591
1591
C0320
1591
2020
1591
0874
1591
1591
1591
1591
0686
0686
1591
1591
1590
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
NOHS
CODE
M0126
42685
M0125
81000
81677
84544
M2829
70870
94220
91160
81876
84546
46970
73300
77150
38580
76720
73790
52131
M0124
84473
09070
M1015
54790
84278
24130
82952
84545
A1297
M0751
M0814
M0886
M1387
M1685
42510
80252
80832
81877
83015
81062
aiceo
LEAD TETROXIDE
LEAD OXIDES
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
SULFURIC ACID
WOODS
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT
LEAD SUIFATE
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1-
TOLUENE
ZINC CHLORIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
XYLEHE
EfHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
OIL, CUTTING
LEAD BOROFLUORIDE
LEAD NITRATE '
BENZENE
LEAD BOROSILICATE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
LEAD TITANATES
DFCHLOROETHANE,
LEAD GERMANATE
LEAD SILICATE
LEAD CARBONATE,
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
LEAD CHROHATE. LEAD
LEAD CHROMATE,
LEAD HYDROXIDE
LEAD BORATE
LEAD ARSENATE
LEAD CARBONATE
LEAD CMLOROSILICATE COMPLEX
IEAD PHOSPHITE
LEAD FLUORIDE
IFAD SULTATE. TRIBASIC
LfAD Z1RCOMATE
(1 = 1)
1.2-
BASIC
MOLYBDATE.
MOLYBDATED
LEAD SUIFATE COMPLEX
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
.211
.200
.175
.148
,148
,148
810
1,056
655
617
615
615
864
855
596
825
803
796
553
550
547
545
516
719
503
497
476
472
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.168
.166
.163
.159
.159
.159
.112
.146
.091
.085
.085
.085
.120
.118
.082
.114
.111
.110
.076
.076
.076
.075
.071
.100
.069
.069
.066
.065
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
. 064
.064
.064
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
UEIGHTED
INDEX
.68*
.669
.634
.597
.597
.597
.126
1.028
.911
.858
.855
.855
.841
.832
.829
.803
.781
.775
.769
.765
.760
.758
.717
.700
.699
.691
.662
.656
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3679 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTMI ION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—HOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7,188
26
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
1591
2432
2432
2432
1280
9050
5010
> 1660
' 0527
Ł 1060
oo 9090
2000
1860
0374
1290
2532
1591
1010
1460
1941
0170
9030
1060
1913
0290
0570
0760
0490
2080
1842
2040
2229
2240
NOHS
CODE
83081
83299
83436
83915
84433
84439
84743
M0877
73253
82157
81945
84055
52138
45930
80243
31500
17366
M0600
50742
80517
33640
82880
83453
25145
38550
5,1090
05250
71055
M0238
32385
90320
17490
20380
15630
57740
50495
55460
111463
M1804
DESCRIPTION
LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE
LEAD MOLYBDATE
LEAD PHOSPHATE. DIBASIC
LEAD PHOSPHATE, TRIBASIC
LEAD SULFIDE
LEAD CHLORIDE
LEAD SILICOCHROMATE
STANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
STANNOUS OXIDE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
OIL, LUBE
METHANOL
CARBON
ETHYL ALCOHOL
GRAPHITE
PARAFFIN
NITRIC ACID
SODIUM BORATE
FORMALDEHYDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
DIOXANE, 1,4-
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
NITROPROPANE, 2-
AMMONIA
TALC
ALCOHOL
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
ASPHALT
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CRESOL
CAOI1IUM OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
NICKEL OXIDES
PHENOL
IRON OXIDE. RED
SILVER POWDER
379 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3679
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
467
467
467
467
467
467
467
616
612
610
421
587
409
569
382
1,260
527
359
322
436
302
427
289
283
280
275
391
390
887
264
252
249
247
235
223
222
216
280
268
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.064
.085
.085
.084
.058
.081
.056
.079
.053
.175
.073
.049
.044
.060
.042
.059
.040
.039
.038
.038
.054
.054
.123
.036
.035
.034
.034
.032
.031
.030
.030
.038
.037
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
10
07
10
03
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.649
.599
.595
.594
.585
.571
.569
.554
.531
.525
.513
.499
.447
.424
.420
.415
.402
.393
.389
.382
.380
.379
.370
.367
.350
.346
.343
.326
.310
.308
.300
.272
.260
OTHER TOTALS'
72,097
9.834
66.697
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
1769 SPACE VEHICLE EQUIPMENT. NEC.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
38
IHFOM
CODE
5010
5010
1591
2490
2532
1060
1030
0926
0230
0230
1591
2620
•b, 2229
I 9050
H> 2000
^> 1591
^ 9090
0310
0160
1060
1790
0460
0440
NOHS
CODE
52131
52138
83453
73790
82880
M0238
04980
27615
A1433
07310
42490
M0626
M1463
84055
M0600
M1693
17366
M2929
20265
31500
80056
13850
14380
DESCRIPTION
OIL. CUTTING
OIL. LUBE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
ETHYLEHE. TRICHLORO-
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ALCOHOL
ETHANOLAMINE
DIPHENYLAMINE
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
IRON OXIDE. RED
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
PARAFFIN
LEAD SOAP
GRAPHITE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
BUTANOL
BUTYL ACETATE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
72
36
36
36
36
72
72
36
10
10
10
10
10
10
6
6
6
36
10
7
6
7
7
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1.894
.947
.947
.947
.947
1.894
1.894
.947
.263
.263
.263
.263
.263
.263
.157
.157
.157
.947
.263
.184
.157
.184
.184
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
03
03
03
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
07
01
03
03
03
01
01
UEIGHTEI
INDEX
18.947
9.473
9.473
6.631
6.631
5.684
5.684
2.842
2.631
2.631
2.631
.842
.842
.842
.578
.578
.105
.947
.789
.552
.473
.184
.184
23 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3769
OTHER TOTALS:
547
14.385
86.174
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3811 ENGINEERING t SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
4,632
12
>
1
to
o
o
IHFOM
CODE
2037
2490
1720
5010
5010
2611
1060
1430
2460
2310
0290
I860
C0320
0645
1190
1591
0686
1060
2000
9050
2590
0874
2532
1280
1536
1460
C9020
2495
9090
1913
1018
1591
1591
2581
1660
0170
C25BO
0680
1842
1010
0720
NOHS
CODE
M2829
73790
46970
52131
52138
77150
31500
38580
73300
70870
90320
50742
09070
29010
32550
83453
19360
M0238
M0600
84055
76720
24130
82880
81945
40430
38550
90310
73770
17366
32385
M0347
M0125
M0126
M1392
45930
05250
76445
18260
50420
25145
19770
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1-
OIL, CUTTING
OIL. LUBE
ZINC CHLORIDE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
SULFURIC ACID
ASPHALT
NITRIC ACID
BENZENE
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
ETHYLENE OXIDE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
CHROMIC ACID
ALCOHOL
PARAFFIN
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
XYLENE
DICHIOROETHANE. 1,2-
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
ASBESTOS
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,2-
GRAPHITE
ETHYLEHE GLYCOL
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2-
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
VINYL CYCLOHEXENE DIOXIDE
METHANOL
AMMONIA
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROPRENE
NICKEL
DIOXANE. 1.4-
COBALT
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
781
888
884
503
487
479
1.561
631
614
568
386
381
318
317
315
309
303
963
282
397
396
270
374
261
255
241
235
234
334
230
227
222
222
315
305
304
211
203
194
188
1A7
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.168
.191
.190
.108
.105
.103
.337
.136
.132
.122
.083
.082
.068
.068
.068
.066
.065
.207
.060
.085
.085
.058
.080
.056
.055
.052
.050
.050
.072
.049
.049
.047
.047
.068
.065
.065
.045
.043
.041
.040
.040
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
07
10
10
10
03
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.686
.341
.335
.085
.051
.034
.011
.953
.927
.858
.833
.822
.686
.684
.680
.667
.654
.623
.608
.599
.598
.582
.565
.563
.550
.520
.507
.505
.504
.496
.490
.479
.479
.476
.460
.459
.455
.438
.418
.405
.403
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3811 ENGINEERING I SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
4,632
12
IHFOM
CODE
0570
1591
0527
2227
1941
0230
0160
1290
9210
0686
0374
0686
^ U31
^ 1030
K> 1"0
o 0230
i- 0670
1591
1591
C0260
1591
0020
2570
1620
2223
2229
1560
2620
1591
1591
2040
2020
0926
1340
1591
1591
1591
2540
0040
NOHS
CODE
17490
42490
80243
80172
51090
07310
20265
33640
94220
M0900
80517
81876
45315
04980
52480
A1433
18500
A1297
M0751
07545
80252
01568
M1727
44030
67405
M1463
40987
M0626
42685
M1693
55460
54790
27615
M0541
81000
81677
84544
74990
02820
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
LEAD
CARBON
PRODUCTS OF ROSIN CORE SOLDER
NITROPROPANE. 2-
ANTIMONY
ALUMINUM OXIDE
FORMALDEHYDE
WOODS
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
SODIUM BORATE
CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2O SALT (1:1)
MERCURY OXIDES
ETHANOLAMINE
OXALIC ACID
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
ARSENIC
LEAD CARBONATE
ACETIC ACID
VANADIUM OXIDE
MANGANESE DIOXIDE
RHODIUM
IRON OXIDE, RED
ISUrktirfl uLCGHGL
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
LEAD OXIDES
LEAD SOAP
PHENOL
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
DIPHENYLAMIME
GASOLINES
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
TURPENTINE
ACETONE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
177
165
159
1,570
153
148
484
143
143
141
201
138
136
434
130
127
124
123
123
123
123
172
165
165
165
163
1.033
145
•38
96
95
133
299
83
78
78
78
110
740
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.038
.035
.034
.338
.033
.031
.104
.030
.030
.030
.043
.029
.029
.093
.028
.027
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.037
.035
.035
.035
.035
.223
.031
.021
.020
.020
.028
. OA4
.017
.016
.016
.016
.023
. 159
HAZARD
UEIGHT
10
10
10
01
10
10
03
10
10
10
07
10
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
01
07
10
10
10
07
l\\
10
10
10
10
07
01
.382
.356
.343
.338
.330
.319
.313
.308
.308
.304
.303
.297
.293
.281
.280
.274
.267
.265
.265
.265
.265
.259
.249
.249
.249
.246
.223,
.219
.211
.207
.205
.200
l
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AMD HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3999 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, NEC.
DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
993 14
ft
\
N)
0
N)
IHFOM
CODE
2000
2037
9050
0374
2540
1060
0933
0170
9210
2460
1060
0290
9090
1913
1797
2590
1018
9030
9085
0230
1290
1536
C2580
0527
0680
1591
1591
C9020
1591
0735
1170
0490
0720
1280
1842
2230
1591
1591
1560
5010
2540
NOHS-
CODE
M0600
M2829
84055
80517
74990
31500
81806
05250
94220
73300
M0238
90320
17366
32385
48910
76720
M0347
71055
68768
07310
33640
40430
76445
80243
18260
M0125
M0126
90310
42490
94040
46935
15570
19770
33595
50420
68295
M1693
42685
40987
52131
til J22
PARAFFIN
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
SODIUM BORATE
TURPENTINE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
AMMONIA
WOODS
TOLUENE
ALCOHOL
ASPHALT
GRAPHITE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
MORPHOLINE
XYLENE
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
TALC
SOAPSTONE
ANTIMONY
FORMALDEHYDE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
VIHYL CHLORIDE
CARBOH
CHLOROPRENE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
ASBESTOS
LEAD
COTTON
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
CADMIUM
COBALT
FLUORSPAR.
NICKEL
SELENIUM
LEAD SOAP
LEAD OXIDES
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
OIL. CUTTING
TURPENTINE (GUM)
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
833
342
334
309
306
677
654
271
167
198
354
104
121
82
264
109
57
73
69
47
42
41
39
37
35
33
33
33
31
41
94
28
28
28
28
28
27
27
269
25
35
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.838
.344
.336
.311
.308
.681
.658
.272
.168
.199
.356
.104
.121
.082
.265
.109
.057
.073
.069
.047
.042
.041
.039
.037
.035
.033
.033
.033
.031
.041
.094
.028
.028
.028
.028
.028
.027
.027
.270
.025
.035
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
07
07
07
03
03
07
10
07
03
10
07
10
03
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
01
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
8.388
3.444
2.354
2.178
2.157
2.045
.975
.910
.681
.395
.069
.047
.852
.825
.797
.768
.574
.514
.486
.473
.422
.412
.392
.372
.352
.332
.332
.332
.312
.289
.283
.281
.281
.281
.281
.281
.271
.271
.270
.251
.246
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
3999 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES. NEC.
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
993 14
>
1
K)
O
U)
IHFOM
CODE
2532
2490
1620
9010
2620
0230
0686
1591
5010
1842
1591
0490
1591
2229
C0320
0430
2620
0040
2170
0360
1631
2060
2420
2682
C2650
0020
2040
2611
1591
1591
0527
0686
0686
0686
1591
1591
0686
1591
0686
NOHS
CODE
82880
73790
44000
66495
77265
A1433
81876
M0751
52138
50495
84546
15630
91160
M1463
09070
13980
M0626
02820
M0256
11855
45315
57740
72085
80219
83341
01568
55460
77150
A1297
M0124
M0647
M0814
M0886
M0926
Ml 01 5
M1387
M1488
M16B5
M2265
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
MANGANESE
QUARTZ
ZIRCONIUM
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
OIL. LUBE
NICKEL OXIDES
LEAD SULFATE
CADMIUM OXIDES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
IRON OXIDE. RED
BENZENE
BUTANONE, 2-
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
ACETONE
PROPAHOL. 1-
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
PHOSPHINE
THALLIUM OXIDES
TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
MOCA
ACETIC ACID
PHENOL
ZIMC CHLORIDE
LEAD CARBONATE. BASIC
LEAD BOROFLUOKIDE
C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7
LEAD CHROMATE, LEAD MOLYBDATE, LEAD SULFATE COMPLEX
LEAD CHROMATE, MOLYBDATED
C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34
LEAD BOROSILICATE
LEAD HYDROXIDE
CHROME ORANGE
LEAD BORATE
BARIUM CHROMATE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
34
29
28
28
28
19
18
17
17
16
16
15
15
21
14
137
19
124
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
16
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.034
.029
.028
.028
.028
.019
.018
.017
.017
.016
.016
.015
.015
.021
.014
.137
.019
. 124
.012
.012
.012
.012
.012
.012
.012
.016
.011
.011
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
01
07
01
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
.239
.204
.197
.197
.197
.191
.181
.171
.171
.161
.161
.151
.151
.148
. 140
.137
.133
.124
.120
.120
.120
.120
.120
.120
.120
.112
.110
.110
.100
.100
. 100
.100
.100
.100
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
. 100
247 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3999
OTHER TOTALS:
9,
9.177
53.424
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
4930 COMBINATION UTILITY SERVICES
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AMD HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EflPLOYMENT FIRMS
3.385 5
IHFOM
CODE
1989
2228
0680
C2580
1595
0675
0790
2425
2216
2427
1790
0933
> 9050
I 0360
Ł 0490
^ 1591
1842
2420
1060
1060
1030
2080
1170
0926
0850
2720
0932
1646
1616
1520
2537
2570
1620
0867
0310
0720
0560
0527
2229
HOHS
CODE
54160
67530
18260
76445
09318
M0419
M2865
28880
65070
71900
80056
81806
84055
11855
15630
42685
50495
72085
31500
M0238
04980
57740
46935
27615
M0377
23360
26420
46210
80046
40297
A1003
A1010
44035
24003
M2929
19770
17460
B0243
M1463
DESCRIPTION
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ROTENOHE
CHLOROPRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
LINDANE
TRICHLORONITROMETHANE
CALCIUM CYANIDE
ENDOSULFAN
PYRETHRUM
TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
LEAD OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ALCOHOL
ETHANOLAMINE
PHOSPHINE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE
DIPHENYLAMINE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, 2,2-DICHIOROVINYL DIMETHYL ESTER
PHOSPHOROTHIOIC ACID. 0,0-DIETHYL 0-<2-ISOPROPYL-6-METHYL-4-
PHOSPHORIC ACID. 1,2-DIBROMO-2,2-DICHLOROETHYL DIMETHYL ESTE
METHOXYCHLOR
DIETHYL MERCAPTOSUCCINATE. 0,0- DIMETHYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE OF
IRON OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
VANADIUM OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
COBALT
CARBON MONOXIDE
CARBON
IRON OXIDE. RED
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
718
685
458
448
618
615
615
615
615
615
1.339
999
412
253
253
253
253
253
836
697
697
198
652
647
615
615
615
615
615
255
253
253
253
154
1.454
143
198
133
189
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.212
.202
.135
.132
.182
.181
.181
.181
.181
.181
.395
.295
.121
.074
.074
.074
.074
.074
.246
.205
.205
.058
.192
.191
.181
.181
.181
.181
.181
.075
.074
.074
.074
.045
.429
.042
.058
.039
.055
HAZARD
HEIGHT
07
07
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
03
03
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
03
03
10
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
07
07
07
07
10
01
10
07
10
07
UEIGHTE
INDEX
1.484
1.416
1.353
1.323
1.277
1.271
.271
.271
.271
.271
.186
.885
.851
.747
.747
.747
.747
.747
.740
.617
.617
.584
.577
.573
.545
.545
.545
.545
.54S
.527
.523
.523
.523
.454
.429
.422
.409
.392
.390
226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 4930
OTHER TOTALS:
71,792
21.079
137.025
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5080 MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT,
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
IHFOM
CODE
5010
1591
2490
2532
2037
2611
2460
0686
0374
2590
0874
0570
0760
> 1591
M 200°
o 9050
ui 1720
2020
9090
1591
C0320
1660
2170
2037
0540
0867
9030
022Q
0290
0230
0230
1591
2540
0926
1060
2229
1340
1591
1911
1591
0527
NOHS
CODE
52138
83453
73790
82880
M2829
77150
73300
M0063
80517
76720
24130
17490
20380
91160
M0600
84055
46970
54790
17366
M1693
09070
45930
M0256
M0630
17370
24003
71055
06580
90320
A1433
07310
42490
74990
27615
31500
MI463
90880
84546
J2J85
42685
80243
AND SUPPLIES
DESCRIPTION
1,916
33
OIL. LUBE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ZINC CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
SODIUM BORATE
XYLENE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CRESOL
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
PARAFFIN
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1. LI-
TE TRACHLOROETHYLENE
GRAPHITE
LEAD SOAP
BENZENE
METHANOL
PROPANOL, 1-
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
DICHLOROBtNZtNb, ORfHO-
TALC
ANILINE
ASPHALT
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD
TURPENTINE
DIPHENYIAMINE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
IRON OXIDE, RED
GASOLINE-LEADED
LEAD 5ULFATE
ETHYLENE GlYCOL
IFAD OXIDES
CARBON
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
454
387
520
452
305
254
362
248
319
315
218
210
193
190
183
261
253
253
245
168
154
207
141
140
140
140
195
157
125
115
115
115
164
382
382
145
97
96
93
91
90
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.236
.201
.271
.235
.159
.132
.188
.129
.166
.164
.113
.109
.100
.099
.095
.136
.132
.132
.127
.087
.080
.108
.073
.073
.073
.073
.101
.097
.065
.060
.060
.040
.085
.199
.199
.075
.050
.050
.048
. 047
.046
HAZARD
HEIGHT
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
i n
* V
07
03
03
07
0
0
0
0
0
2.369
2.019
1.899
1.651
1.591
1.325
1.322
1.294
1.165
1.150
1.137
1.096
1.007
.991
.955
.953
.924
.924
.895
.876
.803
.756
.735
.730
.730
.730
.712
.683
.652
.600
.600
4 n n
!599
.598
.598
.529
.506
.501
.485
.474
.469
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5080 MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT. AND SUPPLIES
DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1.916 33
IHFOM
CODE
0490
2620
1591
1591
1842
2360
2370
2310
5010
1790
0686
C0260
•> C9020
I 0686
«"J 1631
S 2090
1520
1591
0686
2537
C0260
1520
1018
0360
2420
2080
C2580
1560
0160
0310
1030
0860
0170
0620
0820
0830
2190
0924
1591
NOHS
CODE
15630
M0626
M0125
M0126
50495
71640
71860
70870
52131
80056
80064
07545
90310
81876
45315
81650
40297
80252
M0900
A1003
07555
80990
M0347
11855
72085
57740
76445
40987
20265
M2929
04980
M4016
05250
18190
21560
21660
24390
25820
81000
CADMIUM OXIDES
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
NICKEL OXIDES
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
SULFURIC ACID
OIL, CUTTING
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
ARSENIC
ASBESTOS
CHROMIC ACID, LEAD<2*> SALT U^l)
MERCURY OXIDES
PHOSPHORUS
IRON OXIDES
LEAD CARBONATE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ARSENIC OXIDES
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BISC2-
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHIIIE
VINYL CHLORIDE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
ETHANOLAMINE
PEMTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
AMMOMIA
CHLOROBENZENE
CYCLOHEXAHOL
CYCIOHEXAHOHE
DICHLOROPROPANE. 1.2-
DIJ1ETHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6-
LEAD SUBOXIDE
226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5080
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
83
116
81
81
80
107
107
103
72
239
70
68
66
64
63
63
85
59
57
80
54
76
53
53
53
52
51
496
158
460
151
145
62
140
140
140
140
140
38
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.043
.060
.042
.042
.041
.055
.055
.053
.037
.124
.036
.035
.034
.033
.032
.032
.044
.030
.029
.041
.028
.039
.027
.027
.027
.027
.026
.258
.082
.240
.078
.075
.032
.073
.073
.073
.073
.073
.019
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
01
03
01
03
03
07
03
03
03
03
03
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.433
.423
.422
.422
.417
.390
.390
.376
.375
.374
.365
.354
.344
.334
.328
.328
.310
.307
.297
.292
.281
.277
.276
.276
.276
.271
.266
.258
.247
.240
.236
.227
.226
.219
.219
.219
.219
.219
.198
OTHER TOTALS:
21,160
10.939
59.061
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5090 MISC. DURABLE GOODS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
211
10
1
tvJ
0
~J
IHFOM
CODE
5010
1591
2490
2532
0926
0760
0310
1913
0527
2<.fcO
2590
0374
2037
0570
0874
1290
2040
1060
0522
1660
2170
2000
2037
C0320
0540
0867
I860
1970
0290
1060
1989
2540
9050
1680
1630
C0120
0230
0230
1 140
1 169
5010
NOHS
CODE
52138
83453
73790
82880
27615
20380
M2929
32385
80
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5090 MISC. DURABLE GOODS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—-NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
211
10
IHFOM
CODE
0847
2611
1280
0020
0170
0220
1720
2020
0675
2229
0790
1030
to 1595
I 9090
to 2425
0 2216
00 2228
2310
2427
2586
0230
0686
C0260
1591
0820
2620
1620
1520
9030
0860
0620
0830
2190
0924
1040
1210
1591
1591
0710
HOHSi
CODE
73750
77150
84425
01568
05250
06580
46970
54790
M0419
M1463
M2865
04980
09318
17366
28880
65070
67530
70870
71900
76610
A1433
M0063
07545
42490
21560
M0626
M0921
40297
71055
M4016
18190
21660
24390
25S20
31470
32590
M0125
M0126
notes
DESCRIPTION
DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE
ZINC CHLORIDE
SODIUM FLUORIDE
ACETIC ACID
AMMONIA
ANILINE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1-
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TRICHLORONITROMETHANE
IRON OXIDE. RED
CALCIUM CYANIDE
ETHANOLAMINE
LINDANE
GRAPHITE
ENDOSULFAN
PYRETHRUM
ROTENOHE
SULFURIC ACID
TETRAMETHYLTHIURAN DISULFIDE
WARFARIN
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
ARSENIC
LEAD
CYCLOHEXANOL
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
MANGANESE DRIER
IRON OXIDES
TALC
PEHTANOHE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2-
CHLOROBENZENE
CYCLOHEXANONE
DICHLOROPROPANE. 1.2-
D1METHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6-
ETHYL ACETATE
ETHYL ETHER
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
NAPHTHA
134 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5090
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
12
12
1
1
10
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.014
.014
.014
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.014
.014
.014
.033
.014
.014
.014
.014
.014
.014
.014
.014
.009
.009
.009
.009
.023
.009
.009
.009
.009
.018
.018
.018
.018
.018
.056
.056
.004
.004
.047
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
03
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
03
07
07
07
07
03
03
03
03
03
01
01
10
10
01
OTHER TOTALS:
1.135
5.300
.142
.142
.142
.132
.132
.132
.132
.132
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.094
.094
.094
.094
.071
.066
.066
.066
.066
.056
.056
.056
.056
.056
.056
.056
.047
.047
.047
31.997
-------
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
NEW AND USED CAR DEALERS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX
UITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,669
31
IHFOM
CODE
2037
1913
0374
2611
0686
1591
2590
C9020
0874
9090
5010
2460
i. '"50
1 1720
NJ 0760
0 9Q10
*° 0867
0290
0230
2490
2000
0570
1591
0230
1660
C0320
0686
2229
2020
0686
0686
1591
1591
C0260
2540
C0260
2532
2620
2)60
2J70
1 3
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5510 NEW AND USED CAR DEALERS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,669
IHFOM
CODE
0170
1018
2090
0527
1290
0220
1536
1591
2170
2037
0540
•> 1790
I 0686
NJ 1631
Ł 9210
0 1060
0490
1842
1060
0680
2505
1591
1591
1520
0160
1860
1340
2310
0020
1591
1970
2040
0360
2420
2537
0230
2080
1520
0310
NOHfc
CODE
05250
M0347
81650
80243
33640
06580
40430
M1693
H0256
M0630
17370
80056
M0900
45315
94220
M0238
15630
50495
31500
18260
74405
M0125
M0126
40297
20265
50742
90883
70870
01568
42685
52480
55460
11855
72085
A1003
07405
57740
80990
M2929
DESCRIPTION
AMMONIA
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2-
PHOSPHORUS
CARBON
FORMALDEHYDE
ANILINE
ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL
LEAD SOAP
PROPANOL, 1-
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04K ZINC SALT (1 = 1
MERCURY OXIDES
WOODS
ALCOHOL
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
ETHYL ALCOHOL
CHLOROPRENE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
IRON OXIDES
ALUMINUM OXIDE
NITRIC ACID
GASOLINE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
SULFURIC ACID
ACETIC ACID
LEAD OXIDES
OXALIC ACID
PHENOL
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE
PHOSPHINE
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
253 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5510
OTHER TOTALS:
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
202
139
138
135
134
191
133
132
129
129
129
416
122
109
107
348
102
102
336
96
96
95
95
135
312
90
84
117
110
74
71
70
68
68
93
64
63
89
611
32,822
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.121
.083
.082
.080
.080
.114
.079
.079
.077
.077
.077
.249
.073
.065
.064
.208
.061
.061
.201
.057
.057
.056
.056
.080
.186
.053
.050
.070
.065
.044
.042
.041
.040
.040
.055
.038
.037
.053
.366
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
10
10
10
03
10
10
03
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.847
.832
.826
.808
.802
.801
.796
.790
.772
.772
.772
.747
.730
.653
.641
.625
.611
.611
.603
.575
.575
.569
.569
.566
.560
.539
.503
.490
.461
.443
.425
.419
.407
.407
.390
.383
.377
.373
.366
19.532
106.617
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5540 GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
424
16
IHFOM
CODE
1340
2460
2360
2370
2590
0170
0374
1913
1430
2037
0874
1660
2490
> 0570
J, "20
Ł 2020
^ 2505
1340
2310
5010
9050
0810
1371
1380
1740
1957
1591
1591
0686
2000
2611
9090
2532
1591
0310
9030
0686
1560
C0260
0710
2229
NOHS
CODE
90880
73300
71640
71860
76720
05250
80517
32385
38580
M2829
24130
45930
73790
17490
46970
54790
74405
90883
70870
52138
84055
21190
36060
36955
47030
51705
83453
M1693
M0063
M0600
77150
17366
82880
91160
M2929
71055
80064
4Q987
07545
M0628
Ml 46 3
DESCRIPTION
GASOLINE-LEADED
TOLUENE
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAKETHYL LEAD
XYLENE
AMMONIA
SODIUM BORATE
ETHYLENE GLYCOl
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
METHANOL
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1-
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
GASOLINE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
SULFURIC ACID
OIL, LUBE
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
CYCLOHEXANE
HEPTANE
HEXANE
HETHYLCYCLOHEXANE
OCTANE
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
LEAD SOAP
INORGANIC CHROMATES
PARAFFIN
ZINC CHLORIDE
GRAPHITE
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
TALC
POTASSIUM DICHROMATEfVI)
1SOPROPYL ALCOHOL
ARSCMIC
NAPHTHA
IRON OXIDE, RTD
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
395
442
441
441
441
312
311
203
239
159
113
160
153
106
131
113
62
62
85
57
69
441
441
441
441
441
41
38
36
36
36
48
48
28
258
36
22
211
21
185
EXPOSURE
INDEX
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.931
.042
.040
.040
.040
.735
.733
.478
.563
.375
.266
.377
.360
.250
.308
.266
.146
.146
.200
.134
.162
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.096
.089
.084
.084
.084
.113
.113
.066
.608
.084
.051
.497
. 049
.436
. 06 1
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
07
10
07
01
01
01
01
01
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
01
o;
10
01
10
01
07
WEIGHTE
INDEX
9.316
7.297
7.280
7.280
7.280
5.150
5.134
4.787
3.945
3.750
2.665
2.641
2.525
2.500
2.162
.865
.462
.462
.403
.344
.139
.040
.040
.040
.040
1.040
.966
.896
.849
.849
.849
.792
.792
.660
.608
.594
.518
.497
.495
.436
.429
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
5540 GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED- —
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
424
16
IIIFOM
CODE
C0320
0290
1060
0490
2085
1790
2092
0435
0686
C9020
9210
0460
1520
> 0430
' 2140
Ł 0680
ro 1970
1060
1568
1538
0220
0926
0686
2090
0230
2037
0230
0760
0867
1591
1591
0230
2230
2682
1591
C2650
1591
0160
2620
NOHS
CODE
09070
90320
31500
80247
58520
80056
59162
29930
M0900
90310
94220
13850
60990
13980
60440
16260
52480
n0238
41775
40910
06580
27615
68900
81650
A1433
M06JO
07310
20380
24003
42490
A1505
M2725
68295
80219
81000
83341
84544
20265
M0626
DESCRIPTION
BENZENE
ASPHALT
ETHYL ALCOHOL
CADMIUM SULFATE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
MOLYBDEHUM DISULFIDE
PHOSPHORUS PENTASULFIDE
ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY-
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1)
ASBESTOS
MOODS
BUTANOL
IRON OXIDE. YELLOW
BUTANOHE, 2-
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
CHLOROPRENE
OXALIC ACID
ALCOHOL
KAOLIN
ISOPHORONE
ANILINE
DIPHEHYLAMINE
SODIUM CHROMATE(VI)
PHOSPHORUS
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
AHTIMOHY
CRESOL
DICIILOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
LEAD
LEAD FUMARATE
ANTIMONY DIALKYLDITHIOCARBAMATE
SELENIUM
TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
MOCA
LEAD DIOXIDE
ALUMINUM OXIDE >
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
148 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5540
EXPOSURE EXPOSURE
FACTOR INDEX
18 .042
17 .040
50 .117
15 .035
147 .346
48 .113
142 .334
141 .332
13 .030
13 .030
13 .030
126 .301
18 .042
124 .292
121 .285
12 .028
12 .028
39 .091
117 .275
106 .250
15 .035
34 .080
10 .023
10 .023
.021
.021
.021
.021
.021
.021
.018
.016
.018
.016
.018
.018
.018
24 .056
9 .021
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
03
10
01
03
01
01
10
10
10
01
07
01
01
10
10
03
01
01
07
03
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
07
WEIGHTEI
INDEX
.
.
.
a
•
•
.
.
,
*
.
.
•
.
.
.
.
•
^
•
m
f
m
t
t
t
•
.
,
.
.
.
_
.
424
400
353
353
346
339
334
332
306
306
306
301
297
292
285
283
283
275
275
250
247
240
235
235
212
212
212
212
212
212
188
188
188
188
188
188
188
169
148
OTHER TOTALS:
9,835
23.11A
110.811
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7210 LAUNDRY, CLEANING. I GARMENT SERVICES
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
991
15
IHFOM
CODE
2020
1913
0170
1018
1720
0735
1060
1591
2505
1970
2460
9050
> 2037
1 1660
Ł 2590
[j 0570
0527
0820
9090
1010
0867
1460
1280
2490
2000
0874
2611
0020
1560
0680
0868
1290
5010
C2580
0710
0374
1060
C0320
0360
0490
0760
NOHS
CODE
54790
32385
05250
M0347
46970
94040
31500
M1693
74405
52490
73300
84055
M2829
45930
76720
17490
80243
21560
17366
25145
24003
38550
84314
73790
M0600
24130
77150
01568
40987
18260
24006
33640
52138
76445
M0628
80517
M0238
090/0
11855
15630
20380
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
AMMONIA
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
TRICHIOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
COTTON
ETHYL ALCOHOL
LEAD SOAP
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
OXALIC ACID
TOLUENE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
METHAHOL
XYLENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CARBON
CYCLOHEXANOL
GRAPHITE
D10XANE, 1.4-
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
AMMONIUM FLUORIDE
ETHYLEHE. TRICHLORO-
PARAFFIN
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
ZINC CHLORIDE
ACETIC ACID
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
CHLOROPRENE
DICHLOROBENZENE, PARA-
FORMALDEHYDE
OIL, LUBE
VINYL CHLORIDE
NAPHTHA
SODIUM BORATE
ALCOHOL
BENZENE
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
CADMIUM OXIDES
CRE50L
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
339
96
114
70
84
67
155
45
36
28
40
37
24
33
33
23
22
67
28
17
14
14
14
19
13
13
13
16
111
10
10
10
10
10
99
14
30
9
9
9
9
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.342
.096
.115
.070
.084
.067
.156
.045
.036
.028
.040
.037
.024
.033
.033
.023
.022
.067
.028
.017
.014
.014
.014
.019
.013
.013
.013
.016
.112
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.099
.014
.030
. 009
.009
. 009
.009
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
10
07
10
07
07
03
10
10
10
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
03
07
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
01
10
10
10
10
10
01
07
03
10
10
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
2.394
.968
.805
.706
.593
.473
.469
.454
.363
.282
.282
.261
.242
.233
.233
.232
.221
.202
.197
.171
.141
.141
.141
.134
.131
.131
.131
.113
.112
.100
.100
.100
.100
. 100
.099
.098
.090
.090
. 090
.090
.090
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7210 LAUNDRY, CLEANING, i GARMENT SERVICES
DESCRIPTION
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
991
15
IHFOM
CODE
1591
1631
1842
5010
2080
2420
1591
1340
1369
1860
1280
2532
0230
1680
1630
C0120
0230
0230
1140
1591
2040
0847
2540
1040
2270
2570
0560
1520
1620
2310
2360
2370
2610
0686
1385
1591
1210
0505
2537
NOHS
CODE
42685
45315
50495
52131
57740
72085
83453
90880
35960
50742
84180
82880
A1433
M0420
M0475
03800
07310
07405
23660
42490
55460
73750
74990
31470
69855
A1010
17460
40297
44035
70870
71640
71860
77190
M0063
37510
91160
32590
15705
A1003
LEAD OXIDES
MERCURY OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
OIL, CUTTING
PHOSPHINE
THALLIUM OXIDES
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
GASOLINE-LEADED
HEPTACHLOR
NITRIC ACID
AMMONIUM SILICOFLUORIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
BROMOMETHANE
MERCURY-CONTAINING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS
ACRYLONITRILE
ANTIMONY
ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE
DIBROMOETHANE, 1.2-
LEAD
PHENOL
DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE
TURPENTINE
ETHYL ACETATE
STODDARD SOLVENT
VANADIUM OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
IRON OXIDES
MANGANESE OXIDES
SULFURIC ACID
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
ZINC OXIDE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
METHYL-2-PENTANONE, 4-
IHORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
ETHYL ETHER
CALCIUM CARBONATE
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
176 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7210
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
11
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
66
66
62
6
60
6
59
57
8
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.008
.008
.008
.011
.007
.007
.007
.007
.007
.007
.007
.007
.007
.007
.010
.066
.066
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.009
.062
.006
.060
.006
.059
.057
.008
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
01
01
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
01
10
01
10
01
01
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.090
.090
.090
.090
.090
.090
.090
.090
.080
.080
.080
.077
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.070
.066
.066
.063
.063
.063
.06)
.063
.063
.063
.062
.060
.060
.060
.059
.057
.056
OTHER TOTALS:
3.226
3.232
16.758
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7340 SERVICES TO BUILDINGS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
847
1
K)
(-•
Ln
IHFOM
CODE
9050
1913
2611
1970
0170
0868
0867
1430
2037
1030
2540
1595
1190
1720
0020
1680
1140
2000
2590
C0120
0570
0874
1060
1290
2586
1280
0510
0374
0790
0935
0540
0670
1810
0490
9090
1560
1660
2490
90)0
2229
1060
NOHS
CODE
84055
32385
77150
52480
05250
24006
24003
38580
M2829
04980
74990
09318
32550
46970
01568
M0420
23660
110600
76720
03800
17490
24130
MO 2 38
33640
76610
M0579
15730
80517
112865
M2705
17370
18500
49600
82783
17366
40987
45930
7)790
71055
MI46)
31500
DESCRIPTION
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
ZINC CHLORIDE
OXALIC ACID
AMMONIA
DICHLOROBEMZENE, PARA-
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ETHANOLAI1INE
TURPENTINE
LINDANE
ETHYLENE OXIDE
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
ACETIC ACID
BROMOMETHANE
DIBROMOETHANE. 1,2-
PARAFFIN
XYLENE
ACRYLONITRILE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
ALCOHOL
FORMALDEHYDE
WARFARIH
CALCIUM FLUORIDE
CALCIUM CYANAMIDE
SODIUM BORATE
CALCIUM CYANIDE
DIBPOMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE,
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
NAPHTHALENE
CADMIUM CYAHIDE
GRAPHITE
I50PROPYL ALCOHOL
METHANOL
EFHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
T AL C
IRON OXIDE, RED
ETHYL ALCOHOL
1,2-
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
543
365
334
329
442
296
264
349
196
406
159
134
75
89
85
57
57
55
75
50
50
50
163
48
66
45
45
60
57
38
38
38
38
38
54
377
49
48
46
45
89
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.641
.430
.394
.388
.521
.349
.311
.412
.231
.479
.187
.158
.088
.105
.100
.067
.067
.064
.088
.059
.059
.059
.192
.056
.077
.053
.053
.070
.067
.044
.044
.044
.044
.044
.063
.445
.057
.056
.054
.05)
105
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
03
07
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
10
03
10
07
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
01
07
07
07
07
03
WEIGHTED
INDEX
4.487
4.309
3.943
3.884
3.652
3.494
3.116
2.884
2.314
1.438
1.314
1.107
.885
.735
.702
.672
.672
.649
.619
.590
.590
.590
.577
.566
.545
.531
.5}1
.495
.471
.448
.448
.448
.448
.448
.446
.445
.404
.396
. 390
.)71
.)15
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7340 SERVICES TO BUILDINGS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
847
15
IHFOM
CODE
1710
0880
0790
0872
1515
0850
2720
2460
0645
2190
1616
0680
> C2580
I 9210
Ł 1797
Ł 0191
9050
0160
0435
1369
2140
1630
0847
2216
2235
0230
1860
2040
0527
2110
0871
2260
0675
2425
1989
2228
2427
0522
2310
•NOHS
CODE
M0421
24150
68950
24100
40030
M0377
23360
73300
29010
24390
80046
18260
76445
94220
48910
M1226
M1532
20265
29930
35960
60440
M0475
73750
65070
68695
07405
50742
55460
80243
59230
24095
69070
M0419
28880
54160
67530
71900
15800
70870
DESCRIPTION
CHLOROMETHANE
DICHLOROETHYL ETHER* 2,2-
SODIUM CYANIDE
DICHLORO-5.5-DIMETHYLHYDANTOIN, 1,3-
IODINE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, 2,2-DICHLOROVINYL DIMETHYL ESTER
PHOSPHOROTHIOIC ACID, 0,0-DIETHYL 0-C2-ISOPROPYL-6-METHYL-4-
TOLUENE
EPICHLOROHYDRIN
DICHLOROPROPANE, 1,2-
D1ETHYL MERCAPTOSUCCINATE, 0,0- DIMETHYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE OF
CHLOROPRENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
UOODS
MORPHOLINE
ACETIC ACID, PENTYL ESTER
SILICA GEL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY-
HEPTACHLOR
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
MERCURY-CONTAINING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS
DICHLOROOIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE
PYRETHRUM
SILICON
ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE
NITRIC ACID
PHENOL
CARBON
PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
TRICHLORONITROMETHANE
ENDOSULFAN
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ROTENONE
TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE
CAMPHOR
SULFURIC ACID
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
38
38
38
258
258
78
77
33
21
57
57
17
17
17
55
159
20
45
134
13
122
12
12
16
104
10
10
10
10
13
89
85
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.044
.044
.044
.304
.304
.092
.090
.038
.024
.067
.067
.020
.020
.020
.064
.187
.023
.053
.158
.015
.144
.014
.014
.018
.122
.011
.011
.011
.011
.015
.105
.100
.014
.014
.014
.014
.014
.011
.011
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
07
01
01
03
03
07
10
03
03
10
10
10
03
01
07
03
01
10
01
10
10
07
01
10
10
10
10
07
01
01
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
MEIGHTEI
INDEX
.314
.314
.314
.304
.304
.276
.272
.272
.247
.201
.201
.200
.200
.200
.194
.187
.165
.159
.158
.153
.144
.141
.141
.132
.122
.118
.118
.118
.118
.107
.105
.100
.099
.099
.099
.099
.099
.082
.082
120 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7340
OTHER TOTALS:
8,467
9.9«2
59.171
-------
SIC
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7390 MISC. BUSINESS SERVICES
6,958
IHFOM
CODE
2037
9050
2000
2590
2490
2460
1913
2611
C0320
0570
0527
0290
> 1660
I 1720
M 9Q90
^ 0760
2020
2532
5010
0170
0874
1591
0867
1591
9210
1060
2170
C9020
0374
0540
2037
0686
2540
1340
0606
1290
C0260
1591
2505
1340
0230
NOHS
CODE
M2829
84055
M0600
76720
73790
73300
32385
77150
09070
17490
80243
90320
45930
46970
17366
20380
54790
82880
52138
05250
24130
83453
24003
M1693
94220
31500
M0256
90310
80517
17370
M0630
81876
74990
90880
80064
33640
07555
84546
74405
90883
07310
DESCRIPTION
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
PARAFFIN
XYLENE
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
TOLUENE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
ZINC CHLORIDE
BENZENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CARBON
ASPHALT
METHANOL
TRICHIOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
GRAPHITE
CRESOL
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
OIL, LUBE
AMMONIA
DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
LEAD SOAP
WOODS
ETHYL ALCOHOL
PROPANOL, 1-
ASBESTOS
SODIUM BORATE
CARBON DISULFIDE
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1)
TURPENTINE
GASOLINE-LEADED
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
FORMALDEHYDE
ARSfcNIC OXIDES
LEAD SUIFATE
IRII1ETHYLBENZENE
GASOLINE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN
ANHflONY
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
1,011
1,237
824
1,156
1,111
1,095
735
732
672
672
663
640
903
888
866
590
833
826
555
790
549
540
502
492
486
1,587
474
472
668
467
465
456
645
435
432
431
423
423
410
410
408
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.145
.177
.118
.166
.159
.157
.105
.105
.096
.096
.095
.091
.129
.127
.124
.084
.119
.118
.079
.113
.078
.077
.072
.070
.069
.228
.068
.067
.096
.067
.066
.065
.092
.062
.062
.061
. 060
.060
.058
.058
.058
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
07
10
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
10
10
03
10
10
07
10
10
10
07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
WEIGHTE
INDEX
.453
.244
.194
.162
.117
.101
.056
.052
.965
.965
.952
.919
.908
.893
.871
.847
.838
.830
.797
.794
.789
.776
.721
.707
.698
.684
.681
.678
.672
.671
.668
.655
.648
.625
.620
.619
.607
.607
.589
.589
.586
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7390 MISC. BUSINESS SERVICES
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED- —
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
6,958
45
IHFOM
CODE
0230
1591
1018
0686
1591
1591
1430
1591
1591
0020
1591
1591
> 2090
I 1060
|°, 0220
5 5010
0490
2229
1591
2360
2370
1842
1536
1860
2620
9030
2432
2310
2432
2432
1280
1631
1190
2080
1520
0160
1970
0360
2420
NOHS
CODE
A1433
42490
M0347
M0063
84544
42685
38580
M0125
M0126
01568
81000
81677
81650
M0238
06580
52131
15630
H1463
91160
71640
71860
50495
40430
50742
M0626
71055
110877
70870
7325S
82157
81945
45315
32550
57740
40297
20265
52480
11855
72085
DESCRIPTION
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
LEAD
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. B1SC2-
INORGANIC CHROMATES
LEAD DIOXIDE
LEAD OXIDES
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
ACETIC ACID
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
PHOSPHORUS
ALCOHOL
ANILINE
OIL, CUTTING
CADMIUM OXIDES
IRON OXIDE. RED
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
TETRAETHYL LEAD
TETRAMETHYL LEAD
NICKEL OXIDES
ISOnUTYL ALCOHOL
NITRIC ACID
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
TALC
STANNIC OXIDE
SULFURIC ACID
TIN OXIDES
STAIINOUS OXIDE
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
MERCURY OXIDES
ETHYLEHE OXIDE
PHOSPHINE
IRON OXIDES
ALUMINUM OXIDE
OXALIC ACID
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
331 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7390
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
406
406
403
390
390
380
542
370
370
517
359
359
352
1,139
477
332
321
448
309
435
435
299
298
294
406
392
390
386
386
386
259
227
225
225
313
721
215
210
210
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.058
.058
.057
.056
.056
.054
.077
.053
.053
.074
.051
.051
.050
.163
.068
.047
.046
.064
.044
.062
.062
.042
.042
.042
.058
.056
.056
.055
.055
.055
.037
.032
.032
.032
.044
.103
.030
.030
.030
HAZARD
UEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
10
10
10
03
07
10
10
07
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
07
03
10
10
10
UEIGHTEI
INDEX
.583
.583
.579
.560
.560
.546
.545
.531
.531
.520
.515
.515
.505
.491
.479
.477
.461
.450
.444
.437
.437
.429
.428
.422
.40B
.394
.392
.388
.3Bfi
.386
.372
.324
.321
.321
.3H
.3H
.300
.301
.30]
OTHER TOTALS:
84,733
12.017
65.384
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
UITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
7530 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOPS
IHFOM NOHS
DESCRIPTION
120
VO
IHFOM
CODE
2037
2611
1591
0686
5010
1591
9030
0374
2590
1591
1591
9090
9050
0230
0230
1591
1720
0490
1842
2532
2460
1591
1591
1591
1631
0686
2229
2620
0570
1913
1520
2490
1591
0290
2517
C0260
1591
2432
2432
2432
0636
NOHS
CODE
M2829
77150
42685
M0063
52138
91160
71055
80517
76720
M0125
MO 126
17366
84055
A1433
07310
42490
46970
15630
50495
82880
73300
81000
81677
84544
45315
SIG76
M1463
M0626
17490
32385
40297
73790
83453
90320
A1003
07555
84546
n0877
71253
82157
M0900
1,1,1-
PETROLEUn SPIRITS
ZINC CHLORIDE
LEAD OXIDES
INORGANIC CHROMATES
OIL, LUBE
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
TALC
SODIUM BORATE
XYLENE
LEAD MONOXIDE
LEAD TETROXIDE
GRAPHITE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
AHTIMOHY SULFIDE
ANTIMONY
LEAD
TRICHLOROETHANE,
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
TOLUENE
LEAD SUBOXIDE
LEAD TRIOXIDE
LEAD DIOXIDE
MERCURY OXIDES
CllScriC ACID. LEfD(2+)
IRON OXIDE, RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
IRON OXIDES
ETHYIENE, TRICHLORO-
LEAD HAPHTHENATE
ASPHALT
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ARSENIC OXIDES
LEAD SULFA1E
STANNIC OXIDE
TIN OXIDES
S1ANNOUS OXIDE
CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1=1)
(1:1)
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
57
33
29
28
28
28
38
36
33
22
22
30
29
20
20
20
27
18
18
25
24
16
16
16
15
15
21
20
14
14
20
2C
13
13
18
12
12
16
16
16
1 1
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.475
.275
.241
.233
.233
.233
.316
.300
.275
.183
.183
.250
.241
.166
.166
.166
.225
.150
.150
.208
.200
.133
.133
.133
.125
.125
.175
.166
.116
.116
.166
.166
. lua
.108
.150
. 100
. 100
. 131
. Ill
. 131
.091
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 4.750
10 2.750
10 2.416
10 2.333
10 2.333
10 2.333
07 2.216
07 2.100
07 1.925
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
07
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
07
07
III
10
07
10
10
.833
.833
.750
.691
.666
.666
.666
.575
.500
.500
.458
.400
.333
.333
.333
.250
.250
.225
.166
.166
.166
.166
.166
.001
.083
.050
.000
.000
07 .911
07 .911
07 .931
10 .916
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7530 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOPS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
— NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMEHT FIRMS
120 9
>
1
(O
to
o
IHFOM
CODE
0360
2080
2420
2495
C9020
2020
C0320
1790
0874
1750
2570
0560
1620
2000
0335
1290
1970
0686
1430
0670
1060
0160
1300
5010
1842
0020
0170
9010
1060
1560
2540
1591
1591
C0260
1591
0310
0926
02? 0
1520
NOHS
CODE
11855
57740
72085
73770
90310
54790
09070
80056
24130
80105
A1010
17460
44035
M0600
11280
33640
52480
80064
38580
18500
M0238
20265
33245
52131
84269
01568
05250
67915
31500
40987
74990
A1297
M0751
07545
80252
M2929
27615
06580
80990
DESCRIPTION
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
PHOSPHIHE
THALLIUM OXIDES
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.2-
ASBESTOS
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
BENZENE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE
VANADIUM OXIDES
CARBON MONOXIDE
MANGANESE OXIDES
PARAFFIN
BENZOYL PEROXIDE
FORMALDEHYDE
OXALIC ACID
POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI)
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
CHLOROFORM
ALCOHOL
ALUMINUM OXIDE
FIBERGLASS
OIL, CUTTIHG
NICKEL OXIDE
ACETIC ACID
AMMONIA
SAND
ETHYL ALCOHOL
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
TURPENTINE
LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
ARSF.HIC
LEAD CARBONATE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
DIPHENYLAMINE
ANILINE
IRON OXIDE, YELLOW
179 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7530
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
11
11
11
11
10
13
9
28
8
8
11
11
11
7
10
7
7
7
9
6
20
20
8
5
5
7
7
7
15
42
6
4
4
4
4
39
13
5
5
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.091
.091
.091
.091
.083
.108
.075
.233
.066
.066
.091
.091
.091
.058
.083
.058
.058
.058
.075
.050
.166
.166
.066
.041
.041
.058
.058
.058
.125
.350
.050
.033
.033
.033
.033
.325
.108
.041
.041
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
10
10
10
10
07
10
03
10
10
07
07
07
10
07
10
10
10
07
10
03
03
07
10
10
07
07
07
03
01
07
10
10
10
10
01
03
07
07
OTHER TOTALS:
1,889
15.677
.916
.916
.916
.916
.833
.758
.750
.699
.666
.666
.641
.641
.641
.583
.583
.583
.583
.583
.525
.500
.499
.499
.466
.41
.41
.40
.40
.40
.37
.35
.35
.33
.33
.33
.33
.32
.32
.29
.29
95.50
-------
1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
690 MISC. REPAIR SHOPS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
1,032
13
IHFOM
CODE
0230
1591
0230
9050
2229
2620
5010
2037
'1591
2490
2532
5010
1720
> 0160
' 2020
M 9090
t- 2590
0874
0570
2611
1520
2460
2170
0490
1842
0867
C0320
1591
0760
2037'
0540
2080
1631
0360
2420
0926
0686
1591
C9020
1660
0374
NOHS
CODE
07310
42490
A1433
84055
Ml «6 3
M0626
52138
M2829
83453
73790
82880
52131
46970
20265
54790
17366
76720
24130
17490
77150
40297
73300
M0256
15630
50495
24003
09070
42685
20380
M0630
17370
57740
45315
11855
72085
27615
M0063
91160
90310
45930
80517
DESCRIPTION
ANTIMONY
LEAD
ANTIMONY SULFIDE
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
IRON OXIDE, RED
ZIRCONIUM OXIDE
OIL, LUBE
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
LEAD NAPHTHENATE
ETHYLEHE. TRICHLORO-
PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER
OIL, CUTTING
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1-
ALUI1INUM OXIDE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
GRAPHITE
XYLENE
D1CHLOROETHANE, 1,2-
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
ZINC CHLORIDE
IRON OXIDES
TOLUENE
PROPANOL, 1-
CADMIUM OXIDES
NICKEL OXIDES
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
BEHZEIIE
LEAD OXIDES
CRESOL
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
PHOSPH1NE
MERCURY OXIDES
BERYLLIUM OXIDES
THALLIUM OXIDES
DIPHENYlAniNE
INORGANIC CHROMATES
INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS
ASBESTOS
MEIHAMOl
SODIUM BORATE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
641
641
638
859
782
748
444
440
381
516
449
275
323
751
294
282
241
146
142
137
190
190
132
130
128
126
125
124
121
120
120
120
117
116
116
380
112
112
102
130
130
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.621
.621
.618
.832
.757
.724
.430
.426
.369
.500
.435
.266
.312
.727
.284
.273
.233
.141
.137
.132
.184
.184
.127
.125
.124
.122
.121
.120
.117
.116
.116
.116
.113
.112
.112
.368
. 108
. 108
.098
. 125
. 125
HAZARD WEIGHTED
WEIGHT INDEX
10 (.211
10 6.211
10 6.182
07 5.826
07 5.304
07 5.073
10 4.302
10 4.263
10 3.691
07 3.500
07 3.045
10 2.664
07 2.190
03 2.183
07
07
07
10
10
10
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
03
10
.994
.912
.634
.414
.375
.327
.288
.288
.279
.259
.240
.220
.211
.201
.172
.162
.162
.162
.133
.124
. 124
. 104
.085
10 1.085
10 988
07 .881
07 .881
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
7690 MISC. REPAIR SHOPS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
IHFOM
CODE
0220
2540
0560
1430
2432
2570
1620
9030
1591
9010
1030
2537
2000
> 1842
NJ 1°'°
fo 2537
to 1913
1280
0290
1060
1790
0310
1591
2240
0020
0860
0620
0820
0830
2190
0924
1790
1290
0170
0686
1018
2110
9210
0640
NOHS
CODE
06580
74990
17460
38580
73253
A1010
44035
71055
M0751
111806
04980
80230
M0600
84269
M0238
A1003
32385
81945
90320
31500
80056
M2929
M1693
68748
01568
M4016
18190
21560
21660
24390
25820
48628
33640
05250
81876
M0347
59230
94220
18340
1,032
13
DESCRIPTION
ANILINE
TURPENTINE
CARBON MONOXIDE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE
TIN OXIDES
VANADIUM OXIDES
K.ANGANESE OXIDES
TALC
LEADED ZINC OXIDE
SILICA FLOUR
ETHANOLAMINE
TUNGSTEN CARBIDE
PARAFFIN
NICKEL OXIDE
ALCOHOL
TUNGSTEN OXIDES
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE
ASPHALT
ETHYL ALCOHOL
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE
LEAD SOAP
SILVER OXIDES
ACETIC ACID
PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-. 2-
CHLOROBENZEHE
CYCLOIIEXANOL
CYCLOHEXAHONE
DICHLOROPROPANE. 1,2-
DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2,6-
HOLYBDENUM OXIDES
FORMALDEHYDE
AMMONIA
CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2*) SALT (1:1)
ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2-
PHIHALIC ANHYDRIDE
WOODS
CHLORINE
221 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7690
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
126
122
120
120
US
116
116
115
79
112
260
110
75
63
196
80
56
55
54
179
167
460
41
5ft
57
12ft
120
120
120
120
120
116
34
45
30
28
38
26
33
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.122
.118
.116
.116
.114
.112
.112
.111
.076
.108
.251
.106
.072
.061
.191
.077
.054
.053
.052
.173
.161
.445
.039
.056
.055
.124
.116
.116
.116
.116
.116
.112
.032
.043
.029
.027
. 036
.025
.031
HAZARD
UEIGHT
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
10
07
03
07
10
10
03
07
10
10
10
03
03
01
10
07
07
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
10
07
10
10
07
10
07
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.854
.827
.813
.813
.800
.786
.786
.780
.765
.759
.755
.746
.726
.610
.575
.542
.542
.532
.523
.520
.485
.445
.397
.393
.386
.372
.348
.348
.348
.348
.348
.337
.329
.305
.290
.271
.257
.251
.223
OTHER TOTALS:
21,713
20.918
124.887
-------
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
8020 OFFICES OF DENTISTS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
22
IHFOM
CODE
1774
9050
0020
2310
0374
2000
1591
2037
0230
1913
1290
1860
1970
> 2040
' 0527
K 0170
oj 0335
0522
9090
1310
1660
2460
2490
2540
2590
1060
1953
2135
1060
0820
1797
1560
0710
0191
2127
0575
2085
2215
2270
2610
2140
NOHS
CODE
47700
84055
01568
70870
80517
M0600
M1693
M2829
07405
32385
33640
50742
52480
55460
80243
05250
11280
15800
17366
33720
45930
73300
73790
74990
76720
31500
51118
80221
M0238
21560
48910
40987
M0628
M1226
M4257
17683
58520
63550
6S955
77190
60440
DESCRIPTION
METHYL METHACRYLATE
SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED
ACETIC ACID
SULFURIC ACID
SODIUM BORATE
PARAFFIN
LEAD SOAP
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE
ETHYLENE GLYCOL
FORMALDEHYDE
NITRIC ACID
OXALIC ACID
PHENOL
CARBON
AMMONIA
BENZOYL PEROXIDE
CAMPHOR
GRAPHITE
FORMIC ACID
METHANOL
TOLUENE
ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO-
TURPENTINE
XYLENE
ETHYL ALCOHOL
NITROUS OXIDE
ETHYLENE. TETRAFLUORO-, POLYMER
ALCOHOL
CYCLOHEXANOL
MORPHOLIHE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
NAPHTHA
ACETIC ACID. PENTYL ESTER
PLASTER
CELLULOSE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
PROPYLENE OXIDE
SIUDDASD SOLVENT
ZINC OXIDE
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
13
13
1
1
1
6
12
10
3
6
6
6
13
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.590
.590
.500
.500
.500
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.545
.454
.136
.272
.272
.272
.590
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.227
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
07
07
07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
03
03
07
03
03
03
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
WEIGHTED
INDEX
4.136
4.136
3.500
3.500
3.500
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
2.727
1.909
1.909
.909
.909
.909
.909
.909
.909
.909
.909
1.636
1.363
.954
.818
.818
.818
.590
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.272
.227
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
---NOHS SURVEYED—-
SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
8020 OFFICES OF DENTISTS 22 2
IHFOM NOHS EXPOSURE EXPOSURE HAZARD WEIGHTED
CODE CODE DESCRIPTION FACTOR INDEX WEIGHT INDEX
1040 31470 ETHYL ACETATE 3 .136 01 .136
1210 32590 ETHYL ETHER 3 .136 01 .136
43 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 8020 OTHER TOTALS: 294 13.336 74.804
I
K>
M
-------
SIC INDUSTRY
8060 HOSPITALS
DESCRIPTION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED. SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
NOHS SURVEYED
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
21.955
IHFOM
CODE
1290
0867
1060
0868
0374
1591
2037
0020
1369
1190
1430
0170
_ 1913
^ 1720
,oC0320
to 1310
01 0570
1660
2000
1060
2490
0874
2460
2590
2540
0760
2170
2020
9030
2037
0540
2040
1560
9050
9090
1970
2611
0220
2J10
0522
0670
NOHS
CODE
33640
24003
31500
24006
80517
M1693
M2829
01568
35960
A1719
38580
05250
32385
46970
09070
33720
17490
45930
M0600
M0238
73790
24130
73300
76720
74990
20380
M0256
54790
71055
M0630
17370
55460
40987
84055
17366
52480
77150
06580
70870
15*00
18500
DESCRIPTION
FORMALDEHYDE
DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO-
ETHYL ALCOHOL
DICHLOROBENZEHE, PARA-
SODIUM BORATE
LEAD SOAP
PETROLEUM SPIRITS
ACETIC ACID
HEPTACHLOR
E7HYLENE OXIDE CONDENSATE
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE •
AMMONIA
EIHYLEHE GLYCOL
TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1,1-
BEMZENE
FORMIC ACID
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
METHANOl
PARAFFIN
ALCOHOL
ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO-
DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2-
TOLUENE
XYLENE
TURPENTINE
CRESUL
PROPANOL, 1-
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TALC
NAPHTHA-SOLVENT
CARBON DISULFIDE
PHENOL
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED
GRAPHITE
OXALIC ACID
ZINC CHLORIDE
AHIUNE
SULFURIC ACID
CM1PHIIR
CIILOROfORM
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
4,264
3.968
12.786
3,592
4.899
3,297
3,202
4.542
2,971
2,926
4.086
3,569
2,448
3,330
2.117
3,020
2.067
2,839
1,789
5,944
2,303
1,527
2,155
2,069
1,746
1,215
1,197
1,711
1,627
1,086
1,086
1,074
10.595
1.440
1.235
850
810
1.151
995
965
673
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.194
.180
.582
.163
.223
.150
.145
.206
.135
.133
.186
.162
.111
.151
.096
.137
.094
.129
.081
.270
.104
.069
.098
.094
.079
.055
.054
.077
.074
.049
.049
.048
.482
.065
.056
.038
.036
.052
.0
-------
1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
060 HOSPITALS
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
—NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
IHFOM
CODE
1860
0871
1030
0527
2260
2532
0040
0290
0820
2085
1470
1010
2140
> 0860
' 0515
K 0900
Ł 0830
0230
0620
2190
0924
0686
9210
C9020
1953
0710
1646
1285
1040
1190
5010
0435
1532
1730
1790
1210
0191
0735
0686
NOHS
CODE
50742
24095
04980
80243
69070
82880
02820
90320
21560
58520
38605
25145
60440
M4016
15743
24425
21660
07405
18190
24390
25820
80064
94220
90310
51118
M0628
46210
33565
31470
32550
52138
29930
40380
47270
80056
32590
M1226
94040
MO 061
21.955
43
DESCRIPTION
NITRIC ACID
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
ETHANOLAMINE
CARBON
SODIUM HYDROXIDE .
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
ACETONE
ASPHALT
CYCLOHEXANOL
PHOSPHORIC ACID
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE
DIOXANE. 1.4-
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-HETHYL-. 2-
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANONE
ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
DICHLOROPROPANE. 1,2-
DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANONE, 2.6-
POTASSIUM DICHROMATECVI)
MOODS
ASBESTOS
NITROUS OXIDE
NAPHTHA
METHOXYCHLOR
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
ETHYL ACETATE
ETHYLENE OXIDE
OIL. LUBE
ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY-
ISOPENTYL ALCOHOL
DICHLOROMETHANE
MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE
ETHYL ETHER
ACETIC ACID, PENTYL ESTER
COTTON
INORGANIC CHROMATES
444 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 8060
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
(32
5.827
1.922
473
4.649
654
4.329
431
1,378
3,992
3,850
370
3.696
1.156
3.457
3.452
1.104
326
1.086
1,089
1,086
312
295
274
867
2,574
860
2,550
2,535
244
233
2.303
228
2.220
714
2.044
1.869
268
186
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.028
.265
.087
.021
.211
.029
.197
.019
.062
.181
.175
.016
.168
.052
.157
.157
.050
.014
.049
.049
.049
.014
.013
.012
.039
.117
.039
.116
.115
.011
.010
.104
.010
.101
.032
.093
.085
.012
.008
HAZARD
WEIGHT
10
01
03
10
01
07
01
10
03
01
01
10
01
03
01
01
03
10
03
03
03
10
10
10
03
01
03
01
01
10
10
01
10
01
03
01
01
07
10
UEIGHTED
INDEX
.287
.265
.262
.215
.211
.208
.197
.196
.188
.181
.175
.168
.168
.157
.157
.157
.150
.148
.148
.148
.148
.142
.134
.124
.118
.117
.117
.116
.115
.111
.106
.104
.103
.101
.097
.093
.085
.085
.084
OTHER TOTALS'
220.451
9.866
46.979
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
MEDICAL AND DENTAL LABORATORIES
DESCRIPTION
---NOHS SURVEYED---
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
111 3
IHFOM
CODE
2590
0020
1660
1430
I860
1290
1532
0170
2310
0374
2475
2120
0790
> 0760
' 1913
M 20.40
-j 1190
0867
0868
1369
C0320
0570
0510
0670
1970
0686
0490
1842
1230
1631
1310
2460
1060
1290
1631
0790
0790
0902
0800
1
-------
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS
HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN
TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX
WITH
NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION
B070 MEDICAL AND DENTAL LABORATORIES
DESCRIPTION
—NOHS SURVEYED—-
EMPLOYMENT FIRMS
111 3
IHFOM
CODE
2221
0790
2532
1620
0790
0790
0790
2683
2532
0790
2240
0790
2240
> 1060
' 0530
M 0527
co 2260
0030
0515
2085
2065
0850
0932
1560
1791
1791
2140
0505
1522
0690
1631
1591
0040
1030
2042
1620
2240
1591
13*0
NOHS
CODE
67220
68950
74600
80455
80720
81838
81950
82226
82860
82888
82969
83663
84064
M0238
17367
80243
69070
02740
15743
58520
M0373
M0377
26420
40987
80790
81898
60440
15705
33160
82232
84274
84473
02820
04980
56950
60490
80142
M1693
28110
RESORCINOL
SODIUM CYANIDE
TRIORTHOCRESYL PHOSPHATE
MANGANESE GLYCEROPHOSPHATE
ZINC CYANIDE
GOLD CYANIDE
GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE
BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENES
PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER
AMMONIUM CYANIDE
SILVER SODIUM CYANIDE
COBALT CYANIDE
POTASSIUM SILVER CYANIDE
ALCOHOL
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
ACETIC ANHYDRIDE
CALCIUM HYDROXIDE
PHOSPHORIC ACID
METHYL 3-(DIMETHOXYPHOSPHINYLOXY) CROTONATE
PHOSPHORIC1 ACID. 2,2-DICHLOROVIHYL DIMETHYL ESTER
PHOSPHORIC ACID. 1.2-DIBROMO-2.2-DICHLOROETHYL DIMETHYL ESTE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
AMMONIUM MOLYBDATE(VI)
MOLYBDIC ACID
POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE
CALCIUM CARBONATE
FERRIC CHLORIDE
CHROMIC POTASSIUM SULFATE
MERCURIC CHLORIDE
LEAD HITRATE
ACETONE
ETHANOLAMINE
PHEMYLENEDIAMINE. PARA-
POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE
SILVER NITRATE
LEAD SOAP
HYDRAZINE
EXPOSURE
FACTOR
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
27
80
6
53
7
48
48
15
15
15
45
15
15
33
31
30
3
3
3
24
7
3
3
3
2
2
EXPOSURE
INDEX
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.135
.243
.720
.054
.477
.063
.432
.432
.135
.135
.135
.405
.135
.135
.297
.279
.270
.027
.027
.027
.216
.063
.027
.027
.027
.018
.018
HAZARD
WEIGHT
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
07
03
01
10
01
07
01
01
03
03
03
01
03
03
01
01
01
10
10
10
01
03
07
07
07
10
10
WEIGHTED
INDEX
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.945
.729
.720
.540
.477
.441
.432
.432
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.297
.279
.270
.270
.270
.270
.216
.189
.189
.139
.189
.180
.180
102 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 8070
OTHER TOTALS:
1.990
17.910
98.880
-------
APPENDIX 8
NIOSH DOCUMENTS RELATED TO SELECTED INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH (>300)
SANTA CLARA COUNTY EMPLOYMENT
Appendix 8 shows NIOSH documents available for industries identified in Table 4-11
(in Section 4 of this report). Industries are listed by SIC (Standard Industrial Classifica-
tion); a key to SIC's is given in Appendix 11. The documents listed were identified by
the NIOSH Document Information Directory System (DIDS), a computerized data file con-
taining subject-indexed records of NIOSH documents. To obtain any of the documents
listed below, order from the appropriate agency:
Single copies of those documents cited as "AVAIL NIOSH" may be ordered without
charge (include self-addressed mailing labels) from:
NIOSH
Publications Dissemination (R-6)
4676 Columbia Parkway
Cincinnati, OH 45226
Telephone: 513-841-4287
Documents cited as "UNAVAIL NIOSH" cannot be obtained from NIOSH and must be
ordered from either GPO or NTIS. Documents with a "GPO NO:" citation may be ordered
in hard copy at the price shown from:
Superintendent of Documents
U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D.C. 20402
Telephone: 202-783-3238
Documents with an "NTIS NO:" citation may be ordered in hard copy at the price
shown or in microfiche for $4.50 from:
National Technical Information Service
Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
Telephone: 703-487-4650
When ordering from GPO or NTIS, one must include the respective GPO or NTIS
stock number(s). Payment must accompany each order. There is a $3.00 shipping charge
per an order.
Those documents (except journal articles) cited as "OUT-OF-PRINT" or for which no
specific ordering information is provided are currently not available from any source.
Journal articles may be obtained through local public or university libraries.
A-229
-------
TYPE'i Or NiJ^rl
ed publications include the following: Crit3ri? Documents*
Currant Intelligence ?ulletins* Health and Safety Guides* technical
reports of scientific investigations* compilations of d?ta* work ar-»- si a» 9C|
booklets* symposium o~ conference proceedings* and NIOS-1 administrative
and management reports.
CRITERIA DOCUMENTS recommend occupational health standards. Usually
included as part of tha recommendation is a permissible exobsurs level;
i.e.* tha concentration of a substance in the occupational environment
that «ill not cause adverse affects in exaosad oers~ons. Information i«
also included on personal protective equipment* work practices and
sanitation* informing workers of hazards* labeling and posting*
monitoring and surveillance* and r ecordkeeoing. Criteria Docum3nts on
soecific processes may not hava permissible exposure levels but may
recommend »ork practices and control ueasures.
CU33ENT INTELLIGENCE BULLETINS (CI3) review and evalueta ne« information
r?ceived by NIOSH on occuoational nazards tnat mare either unrecognized
or were greater than generally known.
HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDES con ta in~ inf or mat ion to assist s.rall busnsssss in
providing a safe and healthful uork environment for their oorkers.
TH= HftlARO EVALUATIONS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (H5TA) frogram of N
provides* upon request* medical* nursing* and industrial hygiene tecnnir=il
and consultative assistance to pedaral* state* and local acancie-aJ la!>o-;
industry; and other groups or individuals to control occupational nealti
hazards and to prevent related trauma and disease. 3eoorts resulting
this Program may be identified as Health Hazard Evaluations (HHr)*
Technical Assistance (TA) reports* or HETA's. Please note that these
reports discuss the conditions at the soecific «orksite(s) evaluated.
INDUSTRYWIDE (Iy) STUDY '•aoorts assess whether occuoational exoosures of
certain »orkar groups a^e associated with adverse healti consequences.
Further* study dasigns vary (cohort* case control* proportionate
mortality* cross-sectional incidence* reproductive questionnaire)
depending on the question to be addressed and availability of d?ta.
CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (CT) reports examine the most current methods for
controlling exposures in the aorkolace.
CONTRACT reports are generated primarily from an agreement b?*ween NIO^H
and a non-governnental organization and typically involve scientific
research. Since these reports can also result in a NI OSH-numb er ed
publication* some records may sho* both a publication and a contract
number- GRANT reports are similar but generally are done by Bcadimic
insti»utions.
JOJRNAL ARTICLES nritten hy NIOSH authors may apoear in either U.S. or
journals. The DICS listing includes the biblioqrapnic information
(journal* volume* page numbers* yesr) to permit retrieval of tn; =ir». icl?
fron university or public libraries.
In the DTDS data file* tnose SIOSH documjnts th?t do not fit into ?ny at ti
above categories are classified as l«ISC = LLA'Jc'VJS.
A-230
-------
The following SIC's are listed in Table 4-11,
but are not evaluated in any NIOSH report or
document identified by the NIOSH DIDS:
1622
1743
1752
1791
1793
2434
3469
3511
3544
3561
3569
3573
3599
3652
3769
4932
5081
5084
5541
7349
7394
7395
7539
8072
A-231
-------
si:-i54Z
HQ93Q HH:* Hensal Phalos Construction Co./ Gre^i^y,
CO. 6P»
NTIS NO: Pa,-32-1 35-61 i P?ICE: f?.-?5
HHE NO: 21-Q33-S01 'JNAV UL NIOSH
Hl63d HSTA^ Pennsylvania Hospital* Pni1 adslohia* °A.,
Movemlier 1 ?iJ4. 1 3PP
NTIS NO: PB-3S-2D5-247 "9TCE: S^>.95
MHE NO: 34-221-1523 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1G36 HH5x »os«*ount* Inc.* Eden Prairie* MS. 323B
NTIS NO: »?-33-1D4-455 P=iICc: I?.^5
HHE NO: 30-023-365 UNflVAIL NIOSi
A-232
-------
< D -I A
;-m i
H1512 hETA^ SEA (Sulfur E*t9nd?d Isohalt) ?o?d
Construction* State o* wl./ August 1533.
25PP
NTIS NO: P3-35-163-555 p'ICE: 19.91
HHE NO: 32-2^2-1352 UNftVftlL NlOSn
A-233
-------
SIC-1623
Hlo42 H?TA, Port authority of Now York and N»jt Jarsey
Elizabath Industrial Park Site* Łli*l>?th, NJ.
Aaril 1934. 44?'
NTIS NO: PB-=»5-1 14-122 P?ICr: t<3.?
HH= NO: 32-2=54-1456 UNflVftlL NIOSH
M17TO HETA* Papillon Craek Jast -3«»c
-------
S'JbJECT ;M) =
Bachtsl Pow?r
NTIS NO: Pa-32-1 ?2-71 2 'PICE:
HHE NO: SO-1 54-1 027 UNAVftlL N
rtET4* Indiana s, Michigan Power Co.r ^
Construction °roJ3Ct^ ^ockaort, IN.* October
1933. 1*PP
NTIS NO: PE-°5-177-552 P^ICE: S^.V5
HHc N3: S2-3^?-1352 JN-lvaiL NIOSH
HHŁx New York Port Authority, Brooklyn/ NY.
15PP
NTIS NO: P3-^3-127-3*5 PTCE: 19. y i
HH= NO: aO-232-931 UNaVAIL NIQSn
M1355 HcTftx P«rry Nuclear Power Plant/ Perry, OH.,
October 1?d2. 11PP
NTIS NO: P3-U-173-012 P'ICE: S9.95
HHc NO: 82-1r:o-1203 U'^aviJL NIOSH
M1733 H?TA, Philadelphia Li*erack °o«er Plant/
Pottsto«n/ "A./ Aoril 1'35. 2DP°
HHE NO: ?4-172-1573 ONAvaiL NIOSH
A-235
-------
SUcJECT INDEX
H1 o 5 J H E T A * U n i t a d Association of t n e Plumbing
Pig3fitting Industr/* California wept, of
Housing* CA.* July 1 ? ?. 4. 3o°P
IE NO: ?2-293-U32 JN1VAIL NIO'1
H13'2 rtETA* Plumbers and Gssfittars Local Union 12*
Boston* *IA.* Oace^ib^r 1^32. 17"
NTIS NO: P3-U-2K-775 P3IC = : S9.75
MH= NO: i?1-336-1?37 JNAVAIL ^IOSH
Hlo51 HEFA, United Association of tha Plj
Pioefitting Industry* California 0?ot. of
Mousing* CA.* July 1v"4. 3^>P?
NTIS NO: P3-25-220-212 P»IC=: 15.95
HUE NO: ?3-279-1<»32 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-236
-------
•1721
HHŁ/ Golden G?te Bridge District/ San cr
C4. 10?e
NTIS NO: o=-^3-126-4?5 P8ICE:
HHŁ NO: 5:-164-°43 UNftVAT
HETfi/ Grand Gulf Muds-cn- 3ou»er Plant/ "ort
Gibbon/ MI./ September 1934. 22'P
NTIS NO: P2-35-2?Q-3?7 P^ICE: S9.95
HHE NO: 33-132-1503 UN4VAIL NIOSH
Ualk-Througn Survey R^oortx My e*- s~ Chr i s t i ans en
Co.x Kensington/ MO./ Septembar o/ 1975.
«.0p
CONTRACT NO: 21C~77-00?6
IWSNO: I y/ 074. 66 UN 4VAIL NIOSH
13517 y alk-Througn Survey Seo'ort/ Sline Industrial
Painters/Monsanto Co./ Texas City/ Tx./
October 2/ 1979. 3°P
NTIS NO: P3-?3-1 D2-277 P?ICE: '.''.5
CONTRACT NO: 210-77-03^6
IUS NO: In/074. 7D UN4V4IL 'J 1 0 S n
10a48 Walk-ThrougH Survsy Report/ Courtnsy and Co./
Inc./ Texas City/ TX., July 21- 1°S2. 5^
US NO: IW/135.D3 U*4«VAIL NIOS-1
A-237
-------
S'JiJECT INDEX 3:==RŁNCE
H1025
HHŁ» Rich»ay Daoartment Stores* Marietta/ G4.
NTIS NO: P«-*2-162-132 PPICE: «^.?
HHc NO: 30-215-377 JNAVAIL NIOSri
A-238
-------
SUsJECT INO=X RErER'fNC:
-1761
HcTA* Anchor Hocking Glass Co.* Roofing Sit?*
Lancaster* CH.* January 19Ł3. 90?
NTIS NO: P3-S4-173-046 P
-------
SUiJfCT IN D ? X
IC-1799
13711 Industrial Hygiene Survey 'sports Gorc*"?3 + s
defining Co.x Mt. Pleasant* TX.* 3?c. 4*
137??
NTIS NO: P?-?5-222-222 ?3IC=: S1t.9
IWS NO: H/124.11 JMflVAIL NIDSrl
H1023 MHE^ Palmar Industrial Co?tinqs* Inc.*
Williamsport* PA. 25PP
NTIS NO: P9-B2-215-336 »(?rCŁ: ?9.9
rtHE NO: 30-153-831 JN4VAIL NIOSH
S H5TA* Pennsylvania Hospital* Pnilad^lphiax ^4.*
November 1934. 1?PP
NTIS NO: P3-S5-2Q3-247 PPICE: S9.9
MHE NO: 34-221-1523 UNAVAIL NIOS^
M0337 M6TA^ Tennesss* State Health
Oyersburgr TN. 9PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-239-545 <»?ICt: 15. ?
HH5 NO: 30-030-034 UNAVAIL NICSH
H1010 HHEx Tobin-Mystic Rivar Bridg-?* 3oston# MA.
25PP
NTIS MO: P3-33-161-954 PtlCS: ^?.9
HHE NO: 30-097-359 UNAVAIL NTDSH
A-240
-------
S'J2JŁCT IN
Tflx Coc? Cola Comoanyr H ight s t o«n/ NJ./ ioril
1934. 2?P»
NTIS NO: P9-?5-195-523 P&ICE: S?.v
HHE N?: 32-228-14^7 U^avaiL NIOS^
A-241
-------
SUBJECT IN05X
IC-2541
H1733 HŁTfi, DIG* Inc.* 3 hilade loni a<- PA.» Qctolisr
19g4. 7P°
NTIS NO: P3-»5-Zi.7
HHŁ NO: 54-450-1513
A-242
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
.-2751
M14}5 HETA/ Garden City Engraving/ August/ Gi./ March
1933. 21P<>
NTIS NO: P3-34-21Q-533 P*IC5: t?.?5
MHŁ NO: '.2-207-1273 UNAVAIL NIOSn
1022' Industrial Hygiene In-Qepth Survey 5«>port/
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations/
Manuscreens/ Maspeth/ NY./ February 21-23/
137°. 11PP
IWS NO: IW/Q77.26 UNAVAIL NIOSH
13227 Industrial Hygiene In-Depth Survey Ssport/
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Ooerations/
Prints Chanting Ltd./ Island City/ NY./
December 12-13/ 1973. 12PP
NTIS NO: P9-31-241-754 P»IC?: *9.95
IWS NO: IW/077.23 U'JAVAIL NIOSH
10231 Industrial Hygiene In-Deptn Survey "eoort/
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations,
iarrat Studio/ New York City/ NY./ January 1 f,,
16, 17/ 197?. 12PP
NTIS NO: PS-31-2M-762 P5ICE: '9.95
I«S NO: IW/077.2*. UNAVAIL NIOSH
10228 Industrial Hygiene In-0«»pth Survey Report/
Solvent Vapor Screen °rinting Operations'- Sznd
Oisolay/ Long Island City/ NY./ January 23-25,
1979. 13P»
NTIS NO: P3-21-244-691 PPICE: T9.95
IWS NO: IJ/Q77.25 UNAVAIL NIOSH
I32J3 Industrial Hygiene In-Depth Survey 9»oort/
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations,
Ideal Decorating Corp./ Brooklyn/ NY./ January
IS/ 20, 22, 1979. «,po
NTIS NO: P8-S1-2<»5-169 P«?IC = : «9.?5
IWS NO: IU/Q77.22 UNAVilL NIDSH
IC22i Industrial Hygiene In-Depth Survey 9?port/
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations/ Cos
Display/ Inc./ New York/ NY./ December 1?/ 2D/
21/ 197?. 14P»
NTIS NO: P5-32-1D3-0=6 P5ICE: T9.r5
IWS NO: IW/077.16 UNAVAIL NIOSH
'J*'5 Industrial Hygi3n» In-Oeoth Survey 0?port/
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing 032rations/
Paint Process/ Inc./ NSJJ York/ NY./ December
26-25/ 197.5. 13'P
NTIS NO: P9-?2-104-5?1? ='ICr: S9.95
IWS NO: IW/077.14 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-24'3
-------
SU3J5CT INDEX ?E=E?=NC=
13251 Industrial Hygiene In-3epth Survey
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Ooerations*
Hanco Art and Novelty Co.* 3 r o n « * NY.* January
30* 31* and February 1- 137?. 10P»
NTIS NO: P3-?2-1CU-555 PPIC=: S«.'5
IWS NO: IW/077.23 UNtVAIL NIOSH
1324' Industrial Hygiene In-Oeoth Survey Seoort*
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Oparations*
Display Msdia* Long Island* NT.* November 20*
21* 23* 1373. 15?P
NTIS NO: ?3-32-1Q3-0?4 PPICE: S9.-O
IWS NO: IU/077-11 UN4VAIL NIOSn
13250 Industrial Hygiene In-0«pth Survey 'eoort*
Solvent Vapor Printing Operations* Jagar
Studio* Long Island* NT.* December It* 15* 1 9*
1978. 12PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-104-430 PPIC:: S9.?5
IWS NO: IU/077.21 UNflVilL NIOSH
10245 Industrial Hygiena In-Daptrt Survey
Solvent Vapor Screen Printing O
Larstan Processing Co.* Inc.., Maspeth* NT.*
November 13* 14* 13* 1975. 12°°
NTIS NO: P3-32-15Q-E30 P5ICE: SP.95
IWS NO: IW/077.15 UMIVAIL NlOSrl
H1542 HETA* McCourt Laljsl Co.* Bradford* PA., Novembsr
1953. 1DPP
NTIS NO: P3-35-1S1-261 oRICE: S9.?5
HHE NO: 53-266-1391 UNAVilL
H3920 HHE* National Oceanic and Atnosohsric
Administration* U.S. Oeot. of Co^niar ca *
Washington* DC. "PP
NTIS NO: P9-32-1 S3-590 PRICE: 19.95
MHE NO: "0-248-791 UN4VAIL NIOSH
H137Q HETA* Oicy Petroleuti* Inc.* Oenvsr* CO.* November
1°32. 6P«>
NTIS NO: PS-34-172-722 P7ICE: 59.95
HHŁ NO: 32-266-1213 UNAVAIL NIOSH
rt/!363 HETA* Placer County C is tribu t ors* Tahoe City*
CA., October 1932. 11PP
NTIS NO: P3-U-1^2-980 PSTCr: S9.95
HHE NO: ^1-033-1203 UNAVAIL NIOSH
.A-244
-------
SUSJECT INDrX
HETA, Screen Printing Shops^ Boston* Mi.,
Denton, MD., January 1?^5. A?PO
NTIS SO: P5-36-105-3?2 ?5ICŁ: S11.9
MME MO: 22-212-1553 UNdVAIL 'JIOSH
HETAr Tahoe Designs* Tahoe City* CA.x Seotember
NTIS NO: P3-34-149-12"? PRICE: $9.95
HHE NO: 31-332-1174 JNAVAIL NIOSH
A-245
-------
SU3JŁCT IN3EX.
IC-2752
Hi 377 HETA* Arts Consortium* Cincinnati* OH.* Nov
1932. 7P°
NTIS NO: P"-3..-1 72-324 P'ICr: S9.95
HHc NO: '2-01)5-1226 UNAVAIL NIOSH
HQ942 HHE* Oapartmant of Comnsrc9* Washington* DC..
11PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-133-17? P9ICE: 19.95
HHE ND: BQ-111-326 UMAVAIL NIOSM
H1132 H=TA* Hillsrich and Sradsby Co.^ Jsffersonvi 11e*
IN.* Oace.nber 1'gi. 1QPP
NTIS NO: P9-52-132-4-50 PPIC = : S9.95
MHŁ NO: ?1-192-1323 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1193 HHEx King-Smith Printing Co., Detroit^ MI.r
January 1P
NTIS NO: P3-35-159-3D4 PRICE: S9.95
HHŁ NO: 31-304-1361 UNSVAIL NIQSH
H1242 HETA* T»eddle Litha Co., St. Clair Snores* MI.,
Aoril 1952. 12PP
NTIS NO: P=»-33-202-3°3 P"IC = : S9.^5
HHŁ NO: S1-117-1037 UNAVAIL NlOSi
H1325 H=TA* U.S. Army RaSearch Office* ?ese=irc*i
Triangle Park* NC.* Seoteitbsr 19i2. 16°P
NTIS NO: P3-34-150-259 PSICE: «9.95
NO: 32-136-1175 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-246
-------
C-2S1'
H1110 MHE* CMC Corp.* Nitro* WV. 9PP
NTIS NO: P3-33-161-19Q s"> I C E : 1-3.95
HHE NO: M-339-965 jNAValL NlOSn
M1J?5 HETA* Hercules* Inc.* Hop»«ell* VA.* December
19o2. 4DP
NTIS NO: PS-24-172-766 PRICE: S9.95
HHŁ NO: 32-257-1240 UNftVAIL NIOSM
H3330 MHE* Rei*ecki 3erylco Industries* Inc./
3oy?rto*n* PA. 21PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-1C9-717 P'lCE: S?.?
HHE Nf>: 79-037-773 UNAVAIL NIOSM
H1Q72 HHE* Lithiun Corp. of America* Besse'nsr City*
NC. 21PP
NTIS NO: P2-33-102-9Q5 PRIC1:: ^9.9
HHE NO: 33-330-922 UNAVAIL NIOSM
H1670 H?TA* Stauffer Cha«ical Co.* Mo^-r isw i 1 1 ** PA.,
September 1^54. 16P°
NTIS NO: P3-85-203-256 «»'ICf: S?.?5
HHE NO: 32-231-1503 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1U6 HHE* Stauffer Che-niccil Co.* Chicago Heights*
IL..- Nowambar 1931. 3P?
NTIS NO: P9-S2-1 S7-394 ?»ICŁ: ^.55
HHE NO: 53-224-992 UNAVAIL NIOSM
M1719 HETA* United Catalysts* Inc., South Plpnt*
Louisville* KY.* Pabruary 1955. 5530
NTIS NO: PB-86-11&-951 PRICE: t 1 1 . 9 5
HHE NO: S2-3'53,-155 ', UNAVAIL NIOSM
M1720 HETA* United Catalysts* Inc.* West Plant*
Louisville* HY.* cebruary 19S5. 54P»
NTIS NO: P2-96-117-520 P^ICE: S11.95
HHE NO: 83-375-1559 UNAVAIL NIOSM
I03J4 Halk--Through Survsy Report* Herr-VcGee Ch
-------
SUBJECT INJ =
SIC-2321
H1276 HETA/ Alliad Chemical* Baton 3ouge/ LA./
February 1932. 31PP
NTIS NO: P3-33-233-31 '7 UNflVilL MOSH
H1427 HET4/ National Starch and Chemical/ M3radosia/
IL./ March 1933. 11"?
NTIS NO: P'5-34-209-923 =>^ICE: S?.?5
HHE NO: 82-051-1269 UNAVAIL NlOSH
H1311 HET4/ Olin (formerly Allied) Chemical Co.,
Moundsvilla/ UV./ August 19?2. 3?P»
NTIS NO: P3-94-150-465 " ? I C E : S9.75
HHE NO: 31-295-1155 UNAVaiL N
H3925 HHE/ USS Nowa.nont/ Inc., Florence/ KY. 10'C1
NTIS NO: P3-32-H3-234 P'TC?: S^.5
HHE NO: 30-194-7?6 UNAVAIL ^4rOSH
I3i57 Walk-Through Survey Seoort/ 3.F. Goodrich Co./
Louisvilla/ KY.» Seateniher 20/ 1977. 4»P
IWS NO: IU/Q34.13 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-248
-------
SUaJECT INDEX
HETA, 01? Cora.* Warren, MI., Septe-nbar 1531.
1 3PP
NTIS NO: P3-55-173-507 ?5IC5: S9.95
MHŁ NO: 52-377-1376 UNAVfllL NTOSH
HHŁ, International Harvester Truck ?igineering
and Design Center, et. Wayn?* IN. 133P
NTIS m: P3-32-253-2?4 P
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
H1433 H?TA* SutissvaLa Auto Surplus °cfts/ Inc.*
Pittsburgh PA., Marcn 1^?3. "U?p ,
NTIS NO: PS-34-210-3-,4 39ICE: 19.95
Ł NO: 52-246-1275 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-272
-------
SUSJ-CT
:C-5511
HH3* Sob uerren cord* Inc./ Mctni
P NO: 79-128-8D6 JN4V4IL NIOSH
A-273
-------
5JSJ5CT INDEX 3:FE3=NCE
-,IC-721o
pi/a-* H;TA* Oenve- Laundry and Dry Cleaning* Denver*
CO.* July 1M'. 14PP
HUE NO: 14-340-1636 UNAVAIL NIOSH
IQ243 Industrial Hygiene Survay Report/
Perchloroe thy 1 ene* Carnation One-Hour
Cleaners* 5ronx* NY.* August 2d* I'7'.
SPP
NTIS NO: P3-32-1D4-571 "SICE: SP
NTIS NO: PB-^1-244-675 ?t>IC5: SJ.vS
IMS NO: IW/071.54 UN4VAIL NIOSH
lOJio Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Perchl or 03 1 hy lane* Exclusive Cleaners*
Chicago* IL.* July 20* 1^7'5. 3'»
NTIS NO: PB-32-104-332 P^ICE: 1?.?5
IUS NO: IW/071.47 J'UVftlL NIOSH
IT247 Industrie! Hygiene Survey Report*
Percnloroe tny 1 ene* Doutntouin Clean?rs* Chicago/
IL.* July ^•>, 1973. ?P<>
NTIS NO: P3-32-134-537 P^ICE: t?.?5
US NO: U/371.42 J'JIVAIL SI3SH
13332 Industrial Hygien? Su"v?y Report*
J?r ch loro? tiy 1 en e* pearlass Cleaners* Ne *
York* NY., august 33* V79. 11»P
NT 1 5 NO: «*!-? 2-1 33-073 P?IC = : !?.v5
IWS NT: TU/071.52 JN1V4IL NIJSH
10331 Industrial Hyqiene Survey ?3oort*
Perchloroethyl3na* Marvel Cleaners* N»m York,
NY.* August 2-?* 1^77. 11?a
NTIS NO: P3-52-13J-2U ?9IC = : ^.-?5
IW3 NO: U/071.4? 'JN4V4IL NIOSH
lOn': Industrial Hygiine Survey Report*
^erchlof-o^tTylrns* Suhy's Cleaners* H^y
Cl.* July Ł•>, 197^. 10?°
NTIS NO: P3-S2-1 3-i-079 '?IC = : i
US NO: U/Q71.14 UUVAIL M
Industrial Hygiene Survey R
P?rcnloro3thyl3ne* Too Hat Clo-an3«-3* San
i?t?o* CA.* July 27* 13^j. 103"
NTIS NO: J>-i--2-1 -J ?-21 2 "PICE: ^ . ;
US NO: IW/371.24 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-274
-------
SU5J:CT
Industrial Hy^ion? Survey Report*
Per c h 1 o- o ? t ny I en e* Sterling Cleaners and
Laundry* Surlingame* CA.* July 24* 1 "573.
10PO
NTIS NO: P3-32-1 3*»-9;A PSTCE: J>.95
IWS NO: IW/071.21 UNAVAIL NIOSM
Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Perchloroe thy lene* Solden Stati Clsaners* San
francisco* CA.* July 25r 1973. 3PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-191-271 P3ICE: S9.95
IWS NO: IW/071.26 UNAV4IL NIOSH
[3453 Industrial Hygiens Survey
°erchl or oe tny lane* Peninsula cr?nch Cleaners*
inscv*=?r C4.* July 27* 1<>73. 11PP
NTIS NO: P8-?2-1'1-239 P3ICE: 19.95
IWS NO: IW/071.23 UN4VAIL
I](,91 Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Perc hlor oe t hy 1 ene* Mills Park Cleaners* San
3runo* CA., July 28* 107S. 1i«>P
NTIS NO: P3-32-193-S16 PRIC=: <9.95
US NO: IW/371.25 UNAVAIL NlOSh
10534 Industrial Hygiene Su'vey Report*
Perchl oroe thy lene* 3road*ay Cleaners* Redaood
City* CA.* July 26* 1978. 10PP
IUS NO: IH/071. 13 UN1VAIL NI03H
I05K Industri-al Hygiene Survey Report*
Per cnl or oe thy lene* Esrik Cleaners* San
Francisco* CA.* July 26* 1^73. 1QPP
NTIS NO: P3-°,2-1 36-^73 P&ICE: !9.55
IWS NO: Id/071.23 UKAVAIL NlOSi
Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Perchlo^oethy lene* White Oak Drive-In
Cleaners* San Carlos* CA.* July 25, 197f.
1CP3
NTIS NO: P3-32-136-7C1 PRICE: S9.95
IUS N?: IW/071.17 JNAVAIL NIOSH
Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Perchlo~oe thy lene* Soy's Cleaners* Psdaood
City* CA.* July 23* 1°7S. 11PP
NTIS NO: o=i-32-15y-?23 P3ICE: «9.?5
IWS NO: IW/071.23 LPJAVAIL NIDSH
A-275
-------
IN 2 = X
13515
Industrial Hygiene Su-vey Report*
Perchloroethyiena* 3. c. Thomas Cip-iners* Ssn
Francisco* CA., July ?5* 197o. J5?P
NTIS NO: °3-.32-139-9cO P3ICE: S ? . ? 5
IW5 NO: TW/071.22 UN4V4IL NIOSH
10536
I05D7
10511
10513
100:7
13035
10006
10034
Industrial Hyjiens Su-vey Report*
Perchloroethylans* 3aston"s Cleaners,
Lafayette* CA.* July 23* 1975. 9PP
NTIS NO: Pd-82-191-263 P°
IMS NO: IW/071.34 UNAVAIL NIOSH
Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Percnloroethy lane* Janet Davis Cleaners,
) Detroit MI.* May 13* 1=573.
PCIC:: S9.95
U'JSVAIL NTOSH
NTIS NO: P3-S1-227-5C4
IMS NO: IU/071.37
Industrial Hygiane Survey S
Par chl oroi thy 1 en 3* Pina Cleaners* Detroit*
MI.* May 15* 1979.
-------
SJ5J1CT
13333 Industrial Hygiene Su-vey
Perchloro3thylene, Janet Davis Cleaners*
Detroit* *!.* h?y 17* T7J- 5op
NTIS NO: P3-31-245-177 P*ICE: '9.95
IWS NO: I U/ 07 1.3 6 UNAVAIL .'J I OS H
J1Q33 Industrial Hygiene Survey R
Perchloro? thy 1 ene* Upper Mack Cleaners*
Detroit* MI.* i?y 17, 1979. 9PP
NTIS NO: P3-31-245-1 55 PPIC5: S9.55
IWS NO: TW/071.35 UN4VAIL NIOSM
;}j34 Industrial Hyqi?ns Survey Report,
Perchlor oe tay 1 jne, 3 and 3 Cleaners* Chicago,
IL.* July 17, 197". 11PP
NTIS NO: P3-31-1s3-53o PRICE: !?.5
IWS NO: IW/Q71.53 UNAVfilL NIOSH
• ^5^5 Industrial Hygiene Survey Report*
Parchloroethylens* -arnaood Cleanars* Chicago,
IL.* July 20* 1979 SPP
NTIS NO: P?"42-214-719 P'ICE: f'.-JS
IWS NO: IW/071.43 UNAVAIL NIOSn
Industrial Hygien? Survey Report,
Per chl or oe thy 1 ene* Morton Drive-In Cleaners*
Chicago* IL.* July 19, 1979. ??^
NTIS NO: B^-32-215-32-3 ?-ICt: «9.93
IWS NO: IW/071.44) UNAVAIL NIOSH
Industrial Hygi3na Survey Report*
P ?r chl o'-oe thy 1 en ^ * H?ooy Cleaner "^n Cle?nsr.i,
Ne* York* r;Y.* August 2'* 1°73. 3PP
•JTIS NO: PB-i2-2?1-3io priC:: *9.95
IWS NO: TW/071.51 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-277
-------
SU3J5CT
IQ537
Industrial riygiero Survay Deport*
Perch lor o? thy lene* Oaoosr Qan C
Flushing* NY.* ftuqust 50* 1971?.
NTIS NO: P3-32-215-330
IWS NT; IW/071.53
P3ICE:
UNAV4IL
511.35
'JI05H
Industrial Hygiene Survey ^
ferchloroa thy 1 enas ^oycour* Cleaners* Detroit*
MI.* May 15* 1979 3P°
NTIS NO: P^-^2-209-560 P'ICE: SJ.^S
IWS NO: IW/071.32 UN4V4IL NIJSH
13592
Industrial Hygiene Su'wey
Perchl oro? thy lene* 31ua Bibbon Cleaners*
Detroit* ML, May U-15* 1<'79. OOP
NTIS NO: P5-32-215-2^5 »?IC=: 1^.5
IWS NO: IH/071.33 JNiVaiL NIOSH
I307<>
Industrial Hyqian? Su-v«y Report*
Parchlor oe thy lene* Gold "odal Cleciners*
Chicago* IL.* July 16* 1-J79. 3PP
NTIS NO: °3-31-239-774 =>R!C=: S3. 95
IMS NO: IU/Q71.39 UNftVAIL NI3SH
1053?
Walk-Through Surway Report* Perchlor o«?thy 1 e->e*
Sand«r»s Cleaners* Oatroit/ M!., May 15* 1?7J
9PP
NTIS NO: PS-S2-215-179 P?IC=: f9.9
IMS NO: IW/C71.33 UN4V4IL NIOSH
A-278
-------
S'J3J:CT
-7P1
0121S H^TA* National Marine Fisheries
Southeast Fisheries C 9 n t P •• r Ch,?rl.
-------
SUBJECT IfJQcX
5IC-7392
H1625 HETAx American Entgrprise Instituts* Wetshin
DC., lay 1 934. 11 Pf>
NTIS NO: P3-35-154*273 PRICE: S^.P
HHc NO: S3-1T9-1296 U»J4VAIL NTOSh
A-280
-------
SUBJfCT INJEX
HH75 METflx J.S. r.3.*. Central 9?gional L?bor?tory,
Annapolis^ 10.^ June 1?°3. 1 5P?
NTIS '40: P5-35-101-5H1 P^ICf: »9.9
MHŁ NO; ?3-141-1322 UNfiVAIL NIOSH
A-281
-------
SUoJECT INDEX
IC-7399
HHE, fountain S
-------
SU3J5CT
HFT4* CPS* °ouier and cauiomcnt^ 5 o 1 i ngljr ook ^
IL.» Ha/ 1933. 11?o
NTISNO: P5-3,4-2'D?-519 P?I3E: S'i.^
HH= NO: ?3-0?D-13Q7 U'UVAIL NTOSH
A-283
-------
SU3J=CT INDEX
HSTA, Charlie's Taxidermy and Gifts* pla?tiflcod,
?A., August 1?34. 21PP
NTIS NO: P3-25-22Q-309 PPIC5: h?.*
HMŁ NO: ?3-276-U<3?
IQ731 Industrial Hy^iane Report* Savage Walker Schult
-------
SUBJECT INOrX
HETA, Alh^iibra Pizza, Clinton* NJ., Aoril
NTIS NO: P3-?5-135-5?c. P^ICc: T~.?5
HHE NO: 32-Z^>4-1453 JMAVilL NIOSH
H15?1 H'TAx Mark Bradie, D.D.S., Enqlewood, CO.*
February 1934. 13PP
NTIS NO: P'i-iS-l 31-295 PSICE: 59.95
HHE NO: «3-09e-1415 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H16'7 HETA* J. Sutler, D.O.S.* Uell^ton, OH., November
1934. 21PP
NTIS NO: P9-«5-202-254 PPICE: S9.95
HHE NO: 34-090-1553 u'; AVAIL N!OSn
H11S3 HHŁ^ Conifer Osntal G'-oup, Conifer/ CO.,
Novembe" 1931. 9P?
NTIS NO: P3-32-137-04? PPICE: $9.95
HHE NO: 31-200-999 UNAVAIL NTOSH
H1753 HETAx Dental Healtn Associates, Paoli, PA.* June
1935. 14P«>
HHc NO: 34-204-1600 UNAVAIL NIOSH
M3363 HETA* Randle Egbert* Jr., D.D.S., Milford* OH.
3PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-151-010 P^IC?: S9.95
HH= NO: 30-102-7i4 UNAVAIL NIOSh
H1503 HETA* Robert J. Goetr, D.D.S., Cincinnati, OH.,
August 1933. 12'?
HHE NO: ^3- 01 2-1 354 UN1VAIL NUSn
Nld^S r(?TA, Steohan Gold, O.O.S., Port Jefferson
Station, NT., M?y 19?4. 13PP
NTJS NO: P?-35-1 34-257 P'ICE: S9.95
HHE NO: ^1-111-K71 UNtVAIL NIOSH
HH = , Stew»n Janouiiti* O.D.S., Alexard'-ia, VA.
3PP
NTIS NO: P3-S2-15J-152 P9ICE: tg.g
HHE NT: 90-003-735 UNAVAIL NIOSH
HHc, Robert W. Olson, 3.O.S., Conifer, CO.
3PP
NTIS NO: 03-^2-172-107 P^ICE: S^.-3
HHc NO: ^0-249-?33 UNiVilL NIOSH
A-285
-------
SUBJECT IN3=X REFESrNC:
H1717 HETA/ 3rs. Sender and G?rdner* Cincinnati, OH.,
January 1 ? 35. 1
NTI3 NO: P3-?a-1
HH= NO: 34-126-1555 UN4V4IL MIOS^
H0943 HHE/ US'HS-IHS Dental Clinic^ St. Ignatius.- MT.
7PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-15V-756 P^ICS: 5^.95
HHE NO: 33-113-313 UNAVAIL NI03H
H1303 H5T4* Wast Gate Dental Clinic/ Cn«y?nna/ WT./
July 1532. 9PP
NTIS NO: o»-34-UO-672 PRICE: ?9.95
E NO: 62-070-114? UN4VAIL
H1763 HETA* Ors. Youdelnan and Teiq/ 9rentijoodx NY./
July 1935. 14PP
HHE NO: "4-412-1612 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-286
-------
SUiJ-ICT I'OEX ?-.,= E^:NCt
Industry-wide Studies Deport* Industrial
Survey* 3ayna-jon?s U.S. Army Community
Hospital, Ft. Polk* LA., A.onl :<.* 15>35.
24PP
NTIS NO: 03-35-234-474 PRICE: %?.35
IWS NO: IW/152.10 UNAVAIL NlOS.-t
10749 Industrywide Studies »eport* Industrial Hygiane
Survey/ Col. Florence A. Bianchfield U.S. Army
Coanunity Hospital* Ft. Crmpbell* KY., Sect.
16* 1935. 32PP
IWSNO: Irf/152.11 UNAVAIL N 1 0 S H
137*3 Industrywide Studies Rsoort* Industrial Hygiena
Survey* Cutler U.S. Army Community Hospital,
Ft. Devens- HA., Oct. 31* 1°55. 31PP
IWS NO: IW/152.12 UNAVAIL NIOSH
HETA* Denver Seneral 4osoital* Denver* CO.* July
1°34. 3PP
NTIS MO: P?--!5-2?0-911 ?SICE: 15.^5
HHE NO: ?4-17<.-1490 UNAVilL NIOSrt
H10J1 MHE* Ellis Hospital* Schenectady* NY.
NTIS NO: P3-33-126-391 P^ICE: S9.35
HHE NO: 31-350-932 UNAVAIL NIOSH
HU'5 META* Emanuel Hospital* Portland* OS., July
13!13. 14PO
NTIS NO: PS-35-102-345 PICE: S9.9S
HHE NO: ?D-177-11fr6 UNAVAIL NICSn
HH = , Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Csnt-r*
3r0n«* Vt. 9»P
NTIS NO: ?S-'.2-1*>2-249 o^ICE: t9.?5
HHŁ NO: ^1-063-5':2 U'JSVAIL NI05H
A-287
-------
iU3J='-l
H 1 3 4 d HETA* African S * i n 9 Fever Laboratory* Santo
Ooroingo* Dominican Republic/ September 19 = 2.
NTIS NO: P3-?4-150-049 PRICE: T9.95
HHE NO: 32-134-1197 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1546 HSTA* California Society for Hist ot echnology *
Los Angeles* CA., November 1933. 43PP
NTIS NO: P3-25-179-273 P°ICE: S11.55
HHE NO: 31-t22-13d7 UNAVAIL NIOSH
HET4, U.S. E.P.A. Central Regional
Annapolis* HO.* June 1933. 15P°
NTIS NO: P3-35-1 31-541 PRICE: t9.J5
HHŁ NOs 33-141-1322 UNAVAIL NIOSi
H1024 HHc* Georgia Oeot. of Human Resources* Drug
Abusa Laboratory* Atlanta* GA. 1 OPP
NTIS NO: P3-32-214-412 P^ICE: S9.95
HHŁ NO: 81-053-376 UNAVAIL NIOSH.
H1513 HETA* Louis A. Johnson Medical Center*
Clarksuurg* WV.* Seote.flber 19?3. 9o;>
NTIS NO: P3-35-163-442 B?ICE: S9.95
HHŁ NO: .13-363-1364 UNAVAIL NIOSH
Hlb^l HETA* Nassau County HaaltN O^ot. Laboratories*
nemos t ead* NY.* Nowambar 1934. 12°°
NTIS NO: P3-35-203-262 PRICE: S?.35
HHE NO: 34-32<»-1526 UNAV4IL NIDSH
H1145 HHE* Naval 9 io sci'snc 33 Laboratory/ Oakland* CA./
Nov-mbar 1^31. 3"»P
NTIS NO: P3-32-1 ?7-373 ?HCz: ?5.'5
HHE NO: 2'>H3-''91 UN4VAIL NIOSH
H1336 HETA* Olynpic Paninsul? Kidney Center*
Sremarton* WA.* November 1932. 7P"
NTIS NO: P3-54-172-3Cd P?IC5: S^.vS
HHŁ NO: 82-242-1234 UNAVAIL NIOSH
Hi 333 H5TA* Olynpic Medical Laboratories* Bremerton*
WA., November 19fl2. -P°
\TIS NO: P3-34-172-3'39 P'ICr: ?9.95
HHŁ NO: "2-264-1232 UNAVilL NIOSH
H^20o HETA* University of Gaorgia* Coll?g? of
Veterinary ledicne* His tapat ho lo ?y
Laboratory* Athens* GA., February 1"H2.
11PP
NTIS NO: P3-33-193-4Q? 3°ICE: 59. 9=:
HHE NO: -n-22o-1 3-»3 UNAVAIL
A-290
-------
SUbJECT IN3EX S = = -5--NC;
Mj737 HETA* United Hospital, Grand Porks* NO., Aoril
HHE NO: 55-OS5-1S7? UNiVflTL NlQSrt
MHŁ* Univ»rso.ty of Cal i f o^ni a/Mof f i tt Hospital*
San Francisco* CA. 15Pp
NTIS NO: P3-52-215-344 P?IC5: <9.95
MHE NO: 33-191-E29 U^AVAIL NIOSH
A-291
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
103071
H1346 HETA* African Suine Fever Laboratory* Santo
Oo.nincio* Dominican ?enublic* Ssptember 1':2
NTIS NO: P3-34-153-Q49 PRICE: 39.9
HME NO: 32-134-1197 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1546 HETA* California Society for Hi st ot echnology *
Los Angeles* CA.* November 1933. 4?ps>
NTIS NO: P3-25-179-273 P»ICE: til.?1
H4= NO: 31-H22-13c7 UNAVAIL NIOS-t
HETft* U.S. E.°.A. Central Regional
Annapolis* HO.* June 1933. 15P3
NO: P3-35-131-541 PRICE: T9.95
NO: 83-141-1322 UNAVAIL NIOSl
M1024 HHc* Georgia Deot. of Human Resources/ Drug
Abusa Laboratory* Atlanta* GA. 1QP3
NTIS NO: P3-32-2U-412 P^ICE: S9.95
HHŁ NO: 81-053-376 'JNAVAIL NIOSH
H1513 HETA* Louis A. Johnson Medical Center*
Clarksuurg* WV.* Seote.tilier 1933. 9"
NTIS NO: PB-35-163-442 »?ICE: 59.95
Ł NO: 13-365-13t4 UNAVAIL NIOSH
rll6^1 HETA* Nassau County Health Oeot. Laboratories*
Hamostead* NY.* Nowambsr 1934. 12°°
NTIS NO: ?3-S5-233-2c2 PRICE: l?.^5
HHE NO: U-32^-1526 UNAVAIL NUSrt
H1145 HHf* Naval Siosci^ncss Laboratory* Oakland* CA./
Nov»mbar 1 ^31 . 3°P
NTIS NO: P3-32-1 37-373 "?IC=: S'.95
H-tŁ NJ: S3-133-991 UNAVAIL MOSl
H1336 HcTA* Olyngic Psninsui? Kidn?y Cent?r*
Bremerton* WA.* November 1932. 7="
NTIS NO: P3-?4-172-3C.-i P'ICS: $^5
HHŁ NO: 32-242-1234 UNAVAfL NlJSrt
M^ 333 HETA* Olympic Msdical Laboratories* 3r emer ton*
JA., November 1^82. fP°
NTIS NO: P3-34-172-3"39 3'ICE: S5.95
HHE N.T: =2-264-1232 UNAVilL NIOSH
H 1 2 ? o HŁTA* University of Gaorgia* Coll? 3? of
Veterinary Medicine* His t opat ho 1 o gy
Laboratory* Athens* GA.* eebrua'-y 1"H2.
11PP
NTIS MO: Pi-^3-193-43; "ICE: S9.?=:
E NO: -i1-22t>-1 3-»3 JN4VAIL N
A-292
-------
APPENDIX 9 J»
REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCUARA COUNTY0
b
oes
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
f*
SIC
5531
1542
1742
1742
1742
1752
1752
1761
2752
2752
(j
RECSTRO
SEP77
OEC84
NOV77
OCT77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
OCT77
SEP77
SEP77
NAME
CAL'S RADIAL TIRE 125
CAL COAST CONSTRUCTION
DRYWALL INTERIORS
ELLISON PLASTERING
PARKS PLASTERING CO
HOODS FLOOR COVERING
HOODS FLOOR COVERING
ROYAL SHEET METAL INC
DELUXE CHECK PRINTER INC
DELUXE CHECK PRINTERS INC
CITY-CAMPBELL
ADDRESS
S SAN TOMAS AQUINO
529 A FORMAN DRIVE
550-C RAILWAY AVE
491 W RINCON AVE
BOX 876
350 W HEDEGARD
350 W HEDEGARD
861 CAMDEN AVE
1551 DELL AVE
1551 DELL AVE
riTY=CIIPFRT INrt
CA
CITV
RD CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
ZIP
95008
95008
95008
95008
95008
95008
95008
95008
95008
95008
e
JfEMPLYD
3
25
10
7
9
19
19
9
175
175
f
fAFECTD
2
20
10
7
4
3
3
3
1
1
g
UNION
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
h
CARC
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
15
15
15
OBS
SIC REGSTRO NAME
1
KJ
<Ł>
to
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
8221 AUG77 CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRIC
3674 OCT81 HEWLETT PACKARD
3674 JAN80 INTERSIL
3674 HAR80 LITRONIX INC
3674 APR84 TRILOGY
3674 MAY80 Z 1 LOG
8072 JUL77 TOWN It COUNTRY DENTAL LAB INC
OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME
IB 1423 DEC82 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
19 1731 SEP77 WM RADTKE fc SON
20 2952 AUG77 REPUBLIC POWDERED METALS CO
1030
1090
1090
1900
1050
1046
1031
AD
647
44
20
OBS
SIC RECSTRD
NAME
21
22
23
24
1742
1752
1752
7534
AUG83
AUG77
AUG77
AUG77
PHILLIP RILES-DRYWALL SPECIALI
WALTHER'S
WALTHER'S
LOS ALTOS
FLOOR COVERING
FLOOR COVERING
TIRE SERVICE
OBS SIC REGSTRO NAME
ADDRESS
10900 N TANTAU AVE
190000 HOMESTEAD RD
10500 RIDCEVIEW COURT
) BUBB RD
I S DEANZA BLVD
CITY=GILROY CA
6475 CHESTNUT
44 MARTIN ST BOX 307
CITY=LOS ALTOS CA
ADDRESS
13290 LENNOX WAY
5084 EL CAMINO
5084 EL CAMINO
317 FIRST ST
CITY=LOS GATOS CA
ADDRESS
CITY
ZIP fEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CARC
CUPERTINO CA
CUPERT (NO CA
CUPERTINO CA
CUPERTINO CA
T CUPERTINO CA
CUPERTINO CA
CUPERTINO CA
95014
95014
95014
95014
95014
95014
95014
249
420
600
1950
650
100
6
6
1
600
18
4
24
3
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
15
20
20
20
20
20
15
CITY
ZIP JEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CARC
GILROY CA
GILROY CA
GILROY CA
95020
95020
95020
49
9
4
13
7
2
N
Y
Y
15
15
15
CITY
ZIP IEHPLYD /CAFECTO
UNION
CARC
LOS ALTOS CA
LOS ALTOS CA
LOS ALTOS CA
LOS ALTOS CA
94022
94022
94022
94022
3
10
10
3
2
1
1
2
N
Y
Y
N
15
15
16
15
CITY
ZIP fEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CARC
25 1795 NOV82 ASBESTOS REMOVAL fc CONSULTANTS 644 N SANTA CRUZ AVE SUITE 11 LOS GATOS CA 95030 7 7 N 15
26 B221 SEP77 LOS GATOS TIRE SERVICE 577 UNIVERSITY LOS GATOS CA 95030 32 Y 15
OBS
27
28
SIC REGSTRD NAME
3662
3691
JUL81
SEPBO
HARRIS MICROWAVE SEMICONDUCTOR
ESB EXIUE CORP
•- CITY=MILPITAS CA -
ADDRESS
1530 MC CARIHY BLVD
700 MONIACUt EXP
CITY
MILPITAS CA
MILPITAS CA
ZIP ffMPLYD fAFECTD
95035
95035
10
32
UNION
N
Y
CARC
20
20
OBS
29
in
CITY=MORGAN HILL CA
SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP fEMPLYO fAFECTD UNION CARC
1711 SEP77 ASCO AIR CONDITIONING INC 15250 RAILROAD AVE BOX 1480 MORGAN HILL CA 95037 99 Y 15
I(?1I SfP77 RfRT f IFSSIIP TRANSPnR AT I ON lf>','>() PAMROAC AVF ROX M, ) fl MORT.AN HIM TA q">ni7 1 t N 1S
-------
REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCLARA COUNTY
ClTY=MOUNTAIN VIEW CA
OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
ZIP 4EMPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC
31
32
33
31
35
36
37
38
39
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
17
18
19
50
51
52
53
51
55
> 56
1 57
to 58
«5 59
*• 60
61
62
63
61
1711
3576
3832
1522
1511
1512
1711
1712
1793
1795
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3679
1213
7538
7629
7629
8072
8072
8072
3596
3811
3829
3829
3829
3679
3679
3679
1212
1731
SEP77
APR78
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
AUC77
SEP77
SEP77
HAR82
APR80
AUG79
AUG79
AUG79
AUG79
FEB81
MAY80
JAN81
AUG77
AUG77
AUG77
AUG77
SEP77
AUG77
AUG77
DEC78
NOV83
SEP79
SEP79
SEP79
JUL77
JUL77
JUL77
AUG77
OCT80
LEFCO INC
ACUREX CORP
L 1 CON 1 X
THE JACK DIAMOND CO
ROBERT E. AGORASTOS. GEN CONT
RUDOLPH & SLETTEN INC
MERCURY SHEET METAL It HEATING
D&R PAQUETTE
ROYAL GLASS fc MIRROR CO
FERMA CORP
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR
NEC ELECTRONICS INC
RAYTHEON CO SEMICONDUCTOR DIV
TELEDYNE M E C
ANRAK CORP
GENE'S YOUNG AUTO PARTS
WALTER A FAGAN CO
WALTER A FAGAN CO
DENTAL LABORATORY GROUP INC
EL CAM! NO DENTAL STUDIO
VERANT DENTAL LAB INC
CRYSTAL TECHNOLOGY INC
INTERACTION CHEMICALS. INC.
GAS TECH ING
GAS TECH INC
GAS TECH INC
ARVIN ECHO ECHO SCIENCE CORP
ARVIN ECHO ECHO SCIENCE CORP
ARVIN ECHO ECHO SCIENCE CORP
UNIVERSAL TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC
WISMER It BECKER
1300 SPACE PARK WAY
185 CLYDE AV
1100 STIERLIN RD
190 SO WHISMAN RD
101 CALDERON AV
1023 STIERLIN RD, BOX 1089
81 PIONEER WY
110 EVELYN AVE BOX 606
2569 WYANDOTTE AVE
BOX 1315
161-ELLIS ST
515 WHISMAN RD.
161-ELLIS ST
515 WHISMAN RD.
550 E MIDDLEFIELD RD
350 ELLIS ST
1290 TERRA BELLA AVE
2672 BAYSHORE FRONTAGE RD
279 CASTRO ST
275 CASTRO ST
275 CASTRO ST
2130 CHARLESTON RD
185 S DRIVE
1059 EL MONTE AVE
2510 OLD MIDDLE FIELD WAY
1615 PLYMOUTH ST.
331 FAIRCHILD DR
31 FAIRCHILD DR
331 FAIRCHILD DR
250 MARGARITA
250 MARGARITA
250 MARGARITA
2665 MARINE WAY
BOX 818
r. irv='pAin AITO r* -
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
MOUNTAIN
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
VIEW CA
91013
91010
91013
91011
91011
91012
91010
91010
91013
91012
91012
91012
91012
91012
91013
91012
91013
91013
91011
91011
91011
91013
91010
91010
91013
91013
91013
91013
91013
91013
91013
91013
91013
91012
19
99
9
10
3
20
21
8
11
9
1000
50
1000
50
150
150
100
3
3
10
10
19
3
2
19
7
3
3
3
19
19
19
9
30
10
7
5
3
3
1
9
8
3
5
23
1
23
1
6
22
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
30
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
5
30
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
20
20
20
20
20
15
15
15
16
15
15
15
15
12
16
18
19
1
13
15
15
15
OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
71
75
76
77
78
79
80
7391
1512
2821
3611
3662
3662
3662
3662
3679
3811
7391
7391
7539
8072
8072
8072
MAY77
JUL77
JUL77
AUG77
OCT79
MAY79
MAY79
MAY 79
APR81
MAY77
NOV81
NOV81
AUG77
JUL77
JUL77
JUL77
ELMENDORF RESEARCH INC
VANCE H BROWN & SONS INC
MONSANTO INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS
HEWLETT PACKARD CO
FORD AEROSPACE & COMMUNICATION
VARIAN ASSOCIATES
VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC
VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC
GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORP
COHERENT RADIATION INC
ZOECON CORP
70ECON CORP
PALO ALTO TIRE AND BRAKE
DOL DENIAL LABORATORY
HERBS DENTAL LAB
HAHCO POLO DENTAL LAB
ADDRESS
860 CHARLESTON ROAD
2717 PARK BLVD
3100 HILLVIEW
610 PAGE MILL RD
3939 FABIAN WAY
601 CALIFORNIA AVE
611 HANSEN WAY
611 HANSEN WAY
3100 HILLVIEW AVE
3210 PORTER OR
PO BOX 10975 975 CALIF AVE
PO BOX 10975 975 CALIF AVE
306 CAMBRIDGE AVE
703 WELCH RD SU E 1
703 WELCH ROAD SUITE CA
703 WELCH RO RMC1
CITY
ZIP SEHPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALTO CA
PALO ALIO CA
PALO ALTO CA
91303
91306
91301
91301
91303
91303
91303
91303
91301
91301
91303
91303
91306
91301
91306
91301
3
1
9
9
20
199
199
199
15
99
90
90
3
5
3
3
3
2
5
1
3
250
250
250
10
50
20
20
3
3
2
1
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
15
15
15
20
15
20
15
20
20
15
19
20
15
15
15
15
-------
SUiJfCT INDEX REFERENCE
Indu s try-Wide Study Report* W?lk-Through
American McSaw (A-narican Hospital Supply
Corp.), Mi 11 edgeville, GA., March 11, 1'
MIS NO: P3-36-125-176 P^ICE: $9.95
IWS NO: IW/o7.36 UN4VAIL NTOSH
H1133 HHE, 9oehringer Ingelhaim, Ltd., ^idge field, CT.
NTIS NO: P9-S3-1 ?7-4
NTIS NO: P9-31-1*:i-o01 P?ICE: ?9.95
IWS NC: IW/131.14 U'MVAIL NIOSH
A249
-------
106^5 Ualk-Throug^ Survay R sport* Industrial Hyqi
-------
=. J'rCT
HETA, Csliio Che-nical Co./' f's'-ry* OH., March
1°32. 15P"
NTIS SO: P'H-;)3-1'J9-463 PRICE: 19.95
HHE NO: 30-147-1376 UNAVAIL NI05M
HETA* Hopkins Agricultural Chemical Co.,
Atlanta* IL.* June 1933. 1 3PP
HHE NO: 31-4*5-1323 UNAVAIL NIDSH
HETA* Manufacturing Chemists* Inc.*
Indianaool is* IN.* larch 1935. 47P=>
NTIS NO: P3-35-117-561 PRIC=: S9.95
HHE NO: 32-257-1571 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1579 HEIA* Ozark National Scenic Siweraays* National
Park Service* V^n Buren* MQ.* January 1934.
13PP
NTIS NO: PB-85-179-132 PSICE: 59.95
MHE NO: 83-424-KC3 UNAVAIL NIOSM
13741 Industrial Hygi»ns Survey Report, worker
exposures to Organotins* &ed Panther Che-nical
Co.^ Clarksdale* MS.* June 25* 1355. 27»P
NTIS NO: P3-36-117-504 PRICE: S9.95
CONTRACT NO: 200-32-2521
IWS NO: IU/136.12 UNAVAIL SIOSM
N1301 HHE* Shell Cnamical Co.* Denver* CO.* July 19?2.
44P=»
NTIS NO: P3-(»4-137-546 P?IC = : 19.95
HHE NO: 30-137-1145 UNAVAIL NIOSM
I345J Trip Report* Walk-Through Survey ^eoort* Moy»r
Chemcal Co.* San Jase* CA./ Juna 6* 1°77.
5P3
IUS NO: IW/030.11 UNAVAIL NIOSH
Trip Deport* Walk-Through Survey "sport*
Soilserve Plant* Salinas* CA., May 5-6* 1'77.
6PP
IWS NO: IW/030.10 UN8VAIL NIOSH
Walk-Through Survey Report* Vapor Products*
Inc.* Orlando* FL.* July 19* 1933. ?5?P
IUS NO: IW/125.23 U'JavAiL NIOSH
Walk-Through Survay S?oor».* Chevron Cha-nicnl
Ca.* Maryland Heights* MO.* May 24* 197S.
OPP
IWS NO: IU/0?J.12 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-251
-------
SU3J=CT
Industrial Hygian? Walk-Through Survey Report*
Aweron Company* Srea* C4., March* 19S4.
NTIS NO: ?2-95-131-36:i P*ICE: «9.9?
IWS NO: IW/143.17 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1125 HHE* Apollo Manufacturing Co., Grand Rapids* Ml.
NTIS NO: P2-S3-1 5<»-666 P3ICE: S9.95
HHE NC: 31-114-977 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1199 HETS* Arwco Composites* Hartford City* IN.,
Fabruary 19^2. 25PP
NTIS NO: P3-33-231-426 °RICE: S9.95
HHE NO: 31-143-1041 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H172? HST4* Armstrong World Industries* Lancaster*
PA.* January 1935. 42PP
NTIS NO: P9-*6-105-5?2 P^ICE: 19.95
HHE NO: 33-451-1547 UN4VAIL NIOSH
10747 Industry-Wide Study Report* Walk-Through Survey*
3ecton Oickinson Labjiare* 3ecton* OicVinson
and Co., Oxnard* CA., Aug. 27-23* 1934.
20P«»
NTIS NO: P3-36-113-313 P'lCE: S9.9S
IWS NO: I'W/o7.3J UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1751 HETA* Carey Plastics Oivision* Tolsdo Molding
and Die Corp., Carey* OH., May 1935. 2<»PP
•E NO: 35-103-1593 JNAVAIL NIOSH
10719 Industrial Hygi^n? Survey Report* Personnel
R3Cords Systa* Evaluation* E.^. Carpanter*
Inc.* Richmond* VA.* July 1^34. 27t>p
NTIS NO: P=l-^5-223-13.5 P'ICE: 59. v 5
IWS NO: IW/333.14 UNAVAIL NIOSH
I07C7 Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Survey Report*
Cartex Corp.* Morrisville* PA.* April ?i*
1934. 14PP
NTIS NO: P3-S5-222-14? PRICE: «9.?5
IWS NO: IW/33.15 UNAVAIL NTOS-i
H1073 HHE* Exxon Chemical Ca., Po'.tsviila* °4.
NTIS NO: P?-33-102-^i.9 PPICE: S-J.95
HHŁ N0: 79-j:j4-923 UNAV4IL MOSrl
A-252
-------
SUiJiCT
HETA* Globe Industry* Lo«*ll* IN.* November
1934. 1*>PP
NTIS NO: PB-»5-2D5-304 P
-------
SJ2JZCT INDEX
HETA* Rubbermaid* Inc.* Wooster* Ort.*
1934. 13PP
NTIS NO: Pa-°5-23S-2!;> "RICE: '9.9S
HHt NO: f*-2?0-1523 UNAVAIL MOSH
H14?1 META* Rubberinaid* Inc.* Wooster* OH., July 13^3.
34PP
NTIS MO: P3-^4-m-05? PRICE: $«.9?
HHE NO: 82-223-134C UMavAIL NIOSri
I0379 Industrial Hygiene Survey Psport* A.0. Smith
Inland Inc.* Little ?ock* A?.* February 1?Ł4.
19PP
NTIS NO: P3-^4-2i1-751 PPIC=: S9.y>
IWS NO: U/143.10 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1161 MHE* A.O. S«tlth- Inland* Inc.* Little Roclt* A3.*
December 1931 (^ewxsed). 2QPP
NTIS SO: P3-32-132-429 PRICE: 19.35
HHf. NO: 79-104-333 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1233 MME* Stephenson and Laayer* Inc., Grand Raoids*
MI.* Marcn 1912. 16°P
NTIS NO: P3-^3-1 '9-976 PRICE: ^.J5
HH= NO: 30-167-137? UNAVAIL NIOSH
I0a52 Walk-Through Survey Raport* Armstrong Cork Co.
Floor Plant* Lancaster* PA.* July 1?* 1976.
1 2PP
US NO: In/333.1T UNAVilL NTOS-t
104^)2 rfalk-Through Survey Reoort* Industrial Hygi?ns
and cpida-nioloqic Evaluation of 'otantial
Cohort Exposed to R= Radiation fro1* Di a I metric
neat Sealers* Travenol Lalior a* or ies* Inc.,
Mountain Hone* AR.* October 21* 1711. 17?3
IWS NO: IW/033.35 UNAV4IL NIOSH
H1127 HHE* Weatherking Products* Inc.* East Greenwich*
HI. 6PP
NTIS NO: P3-33-l6l-2°3 P^ICE: <9.v5
rtHE NO: 31-004-975 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-254
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
M5T4* Crystal Zoo* Sojldar* C3.«- April 1'35.
15PP
Hrl = f40: ^-3?4-1580
Jeannette Slass Co.»- J
P°
NTIS NO: Pa-?2-1'i9-74l 9RICE: S'J.^
MME N3: '3-019-7^5 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-255
-------
5U9JICT IN9EX REFERENCE
1C-3312
H1533 H?TA, Armco Inc., Baltimore/ 10. t =ebru3ry 1^34
13P3
NTIS NO: P3-55-179-3"d P=!ICE: ?3.9
HHE NO: 81-1=57-1417 UTJAVfAIL NIOSrt
H1170 rlH = / Ssthlehe-n Stael Coro., Chesterton/ IN./
NTIS NO: ?1-i2-1Ł5-Jor ?9tCE: U. J
HHE NO: 30-390-1216 UNavAIL MG3-t
hi* Stael^ 3uffalo^ NY. l?ps
NTIS NO: P3-82-172-l!fO P'ICE:
HH= NO: 30-052-373 UNlVfllL N
H094J HHE^ CF'.I Stael Cora.* °u3blor CO. ??=>
NTIS NO: P3-12-H3-V55 '^TC5:
5 NC: 30-155-S24 JNflVilL
H16S1 H=TA, C.F-4I. Steal/ Pueblo, CO./ October 1334.
14PP
NTIS NO: P3-^5-23i-3A5 ??IC=: 35. ?
HHE NO: 34-099-1514 UNAVaiL NIOSrt
ruold Stsel COTO^HV/ »arren/ 01.,
January 1934. UPP
NTIS NO: PS-25-1 79-224 P?IC5: J?.?1;
HHE NO: 31-2*3-1173 'JNflVAIL NlOSi
H15?0 HETA/ E moira-Oa tro it Steal Oivrsion/ u?nsfi?ld/
OH./ January 19^4. 25*P
NTIS NJ: <»^-S5-1^1-329 P?IC = : 55.^5
HHE NO: c 1-434-14. 3 4 UNaVilL \I03rt
H1&33 HET4/ Inland Steel Co., Eas* Cnica;o» IN.,
October 1;34. 3?P
NTIS NO: P3-S5-20::-67o P?ICr: 59. ?5
HH= NO: ?1-157-1516 UNAVAIL NIOSH
H1539 HETA/ Inland Steel Coro., East Cnicrgo/ IN./
October 13 i 3. 2?="»
NTIS NO: PS-^5-1 77-541 P9IC1:: ?3.'5
HHE NO: =0-009-13?3 UNiVAIL NIOSH
^1534 HETA/ 1-il.anH Steel Co./ East Chicago/ IN./
October 19 3?. 15PP
NTIS '40: °?-?5-1 72-747 P^ICE: SJ.?S
HHE NO: '1-450-1373 JNAVAIL NIOSH
A-256
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
walk-Tnrougn Survey R?aort as part o * Sulfuric
Acid Study at Inland Steel Co.* E. Chicago*
IN.* March ?1* 1979. 11oo
NTIS NO: B9-?Z-150-«J6 2 PPICf: J9.95
CONTRACT NO: 210-73-01"::
IWS NO: IW/062.13 UN3VAIL NIOSH
.,1Ł1o HHf* Inland Steel Co.* East Chicago* IN., March
193?. 6 P P
NTIS NO: P3-33-193-432 P'ICE: i'.y5
HHE NO: 20-235-1D56 jNflvaiL \IOSH
1J53 HETfl* U.S. Steal Co. - Sou thwork 3 / Chicago* I L /•
October 1<552. 11P»
NTIS NO: P5-34-173-9C5 P^ICr: S<5.^5
NO: 31-2"9-1 231 UNaVfllL NIOSi
rtO!70 HHE* J. S. Steal Tubing Specialties Center* Gary,
IN. 24Pt>
NTIS NO: P9-32-151-1Q1 P»IC?: I*. 55
HHE NO: 79-033-763 UNJVAIL NIOSH
'113? HHE* United States St?el Sou t n*orle s* Chicago*
IL.* January 19?2. 1CPP
NTIS NO: P3-»2-1 96-759 P"iCE: ST. 95
HHE NO: ?1-0i4-1335 UNSV1IL NIOSn
.0251 nalk-Through Survey Peoort ?s o?rt of Sulfuric
Acid Study at Jones ?nd Laughlin St33l Core.*
Pittsburgh, Pi.* =ebruary 25* 197'. 1i==
IWS NO: iw/0o2.17 jsavAIL NIOSH
TD26Z Walk-Through Survey S.?oort as part of Sulfu>-ic
icid Study* United States Stsal Coro.*
Oravosburg* Pa.* March 2* 1'7°. 16P°
NTIS NO: P=i-S1-231-3-i2 PSICE: $ ; . * S
IUS NO: IU/062.13 UNavalL NIOSH
Walk-Through Survay Seoort as part of Sulfuric
Acid Study at Bethlehen Steel Co.* Johnstoun*
'A.* March 1, 1979. 1?PP
NTIS NO: P3-82-133-675 P^ICE: >v.Q?
IWS NO: Iw/062.16 u^avAIL NIOSH
HHE* Wheeling- Pittsburgh Stee* WV- 1303
STIS NO: P3-C2-15D-251 P5ICE: J9.95
HHE NO: 79-065-7^5 UNiVaiL NIOSH
A-257
-------
SUaJECT INDEX
C-3441
Inryco* Inc.* Islrosa
1731. 10PP
NTIS NO: ?3-32-137-063 ??IC=: S9.95
E NO: 81-135-1307 U^avaiL NIOSH
A-258
-------
5U5JECT INDEX
cx 3radford Western Core./ Arvada/ CO.
?PP
NTIS NO: PB-"2-25?-112 ?2TCE: 59. ?5
HHŁ NO: SI-OIS-S'S UNAVAIL NlOSM
TAx E1JD Corp.* Englaaaod, CO./ Hay 19B2.
5PP
NTIS NJ: P5-S4-143-122 f^ICE: 1=>.<95
MHE NO: 22-0?^-11l2
HHŁ» Mat silbe st os Syste-ns^ Inc./ Namoei/ 10.
UPP
NTIS NO: P5-S3-157-933 PPIC5: S0.y
MHE NO: 5D-199-97<» UNAVaiL NIOSrt
A-259
-------
SU3JECT INDEX
IC-3A71
h 1 G 5 1 HUE* Fansteel Elact'-o-natals* Inc.r North
Chicago* IL. 9'?
NT:S NO: P9-32-253-1"5 P3ICE: S-9.?
E NO: 31-127--?01 JNftVaiL NIOSH
2 rlHEx sans»:eel Elec tro^stals* Inc.^ North
Chicago, ILL. 3«>P
HHE NO: ^0-1"53-747 UMVAIL 'UOSri
Hlo77 HETAx Stanley Aviation Coro.^ Danvsr^ CO.x
NO: »5-35-22Q-2?3 P5ICE: 3^.5
HIE ND: 34-2?6-1512 UN4VAIL NI05H
H1Q39 HHEx Valley Chroma Platers* i-iy City* Ml.
•jopp
NTIS NO: P3-S2-25S-161 PRICE:
N3:
A-260
-------
SUBJECT IN3?X
HHE* American Standard* Inc.* Louisville*
NTIS NO: P3-23-127-373 PPICE:
HHg NO: SO-1">?-V4d UNAVAIL
META» 3osic Tool snd Suoply* 0?kland/ C*.
NTIS NO: Pn-^5-203-205 PRICE: iJ.V
HHŁ NO: ?4-1v:>-1527 UN8VAIL NUSi
HETA* Modina Hanuf ac t ur i ng* McHenr/^ IL«^ "ay
1'S3. 11t>»
NTIS NO: P3-a4-210-4<,2 P3ICE: S?.'
MH5 NO:
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
H1293 icTft* Elactrodyne Co.* Batavia* OH.* Jun» 13?1.
12PP
NTIS NO: P3-54-U1-431 PRICE: 5-^.^5
HHE NO: 31-425-1124 UNAVAIL NIOSH
r(1443 H=T4x K° Manufacturing Co.* Minneapolis* M'J.,
March 1533. 25P°
NTIS NO: PB-S4-233-71 7 PRICE: M1.?'
HHE NO: 31-375-1277 UN4V4IL NIOSH
A-262
-------
APPENDIX 12
SAMPLE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE ORDINANCE DATA
FROM THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA
Data from the City of Santa Clara The City of Santa Clara had the most thorough
computerization of its Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance data in Santa Clara County
as of March 1986. An example of the type of data available is shown below, including
business description of the company, business license number, date of hazardous materials
inventory, a list of the trade name of hazards stored, the corresponding chemical name of
hazards, and a quantity code. A key to the quantity codes is shown beneath the data
sample. Note that business description is not given by SIC code, and in fact is not
necessarily uniform among similar firms. Also, chemical names are not always given for
trade name products, as seen in the data sample. Company name is available in most
cases. For more information, contact Larry Monette, Fire Department 777, Benton Street.,
Santa Clara, CA 95050; telephone: (408) 984-3059 or (408) 984-3084.
A-339
-------
Out in*tl One
nrc/PRINTED CIRCUITS
Trttt N*m» ... . . . . .
ENOUKA ETCH STARTER
ENCUflA ETCH REPLENISHER
Inv Date Bu» Lie
01/01/93 9704
Chemical Names
AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE
HYDROXIDE
Inv Date Out Lie
10/06/93 1933
Qutinttft De*C
nFG/PRINTED CIRCUITS
Tr*de Nam* . . . • •
NITRIC ACID
HvO.°CCtJl.no rr *r'n
SULFUR 1C AC 10
NICKEL SULFATE
NICKtL CHLORIDE
SODIUM HYDROXIDE
SODIUM HYPOPHOSPHITE
TR1 CLOR III
ECOLOMNC 2001-LCD BOOSTER
3TACUFF 410
STAOUFF 421
ALUM1NUX 1000 .. ._
VANCLO
Chemical N*m«i ,...,..
NITRIC ACID
HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTION
.SULFUR 1C ACID.........
NICKEL SULFATE
NICKEL CHLORIDE
SOOIUn HYDROXIDE SOLUTION_
SODIUn HYPOPHOSPHITE
CHEHICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN
CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN
'CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN
CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN
CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVCN
CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN
ON
Guiu.ei* 0»*c
HFC/PRINTED CIRCUITS
Trade Name
LIQUID NITROGEN .. _
NITROGEN
R-IO. H-100 STRIPPER NnO DEVELOPER
'nv D«t»_ Ou.1 Lle_
04/30/B3 3664
ON.
LIQUID NITROGEN
NITROGEN. COMPRESSED
ETHANOLAMINE. ana taluCloni
Qu>intt* Otic
n^C/PPrNTFID CIRCUITS
Trjd« Nam*
ELECTROLESS COPPER
SULFUR 1C ACID
HAZARDOUS LIOUID/SOLIO_
Inv Date Du* Lie
09/09/93 8209
SPENT FUSING OIL
Chtnlcal N*mti _
'ALKALINE CORROSIVE Liouio.""n.V «.
SULFURIC ACID
WATER ,
'PLATINO'SLUOGE
OIL SLUDGE
COPPER
HAZARDOUS WASTE/n a. 1.
OIL. PETROLEUM. N. 0. S.
QUANTITY HANCE NUM3EK
1
RANGE AMOUNTS
Up CO «nd Including 500 pounds for lelldj. 33
for liquids, «nd 200 cubic (etc *t ST? for compriixd
B«cw«tn 300 and 3,000 pounds for solids, 33 and 330
(•lions for liquids,
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
M1322 HH = » p ederal-logul Metal Removal Tooling
Division/ Chicago* IL. 12pP
NTIS NO: P5-32-21 5-351 PPICE: S9.?
NH: ^0-C5S-374 JNflVAIL N
HrTA, N.P.C. 5xst»flis^ Inc.* Milford* NH./
NTIS NO: P=?-U-14<5-11 1 P^ICE: 59.^
HHE NO: 31-212-116? UN-WalL NIDSH
A-263
-------
SU3J5CT IMDfX S5FE5FNC5
SIC-3559
H1257 rlETA* Aqus-Chamx Inc./ Milmaukee* UT.s ^?y 19-2.
35P»
NTIS NO: P3-34-1 39-5H2 P=?IC = : t9.?5
HHŁ NO: =50-119-1103 U'JAVAIL NIOSM
H1Q41 HHE* Pilgrim Glass Co.* Ceredox WV. 3»P
NTIS NO: P3-a2-257-730 "KICE: 19.95
HHE NO: =1-239-391 UN
-------
SUBJECT INDEX
MET*/ Oalco electronics division/ General
Motors/ Mi laauk
NTIS NO: P8-35-163-5-56 P?TCr: «?.?
MH5 NO: 32-323-13-)0 u^AVAIL NIOSH
HHE/ Seattle Air Traffic Control Center ( F 4 a) ,
Auburn/ MA. 14PP
NTIS NO: P«-^2-?15-25o P=?ICE: S^.?
HHŁ NO: 30-052-352 IHAVML NIOSM
A-265
-------
SUBJECT INDEX REFERENCE
13344 Industrial Hygiene Reoort Walk-Through Survey
Saport* Soiare* Corp.* Rockville* MC.* *?y 3*
1?79. 13PP
NTIS NO: P9-32-10.3-234 P^ICE: 19.95
IWS NO: IW/063.1? UNAVAIL NIOSH
I3o37 Industrial Hygiens Walk-Throu gn Surv ?y Deport*
Litton Electron Turta Diwisionx Scin Ccirlos* CA.
22P»
NTIS NO: 03-33-110-333 PPICE: ^9.5S
IWS NO: IW/113.13 UN4VAIL NIDSrt
I0o33 Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Survey
bionics* Inc.* Westliury* NY. 13'°
NTIS NO: PB-33-111-137 P5IC5: J3.-J
IWS NO: IW/113.13 USavAIL MOSH
I0o31 Industrial Hygiana Walk-Through Surv9y ^soortx
RCA, Somerville* NJ. 15PP
NTIS NO: P3-33-111-195 P^ICE: S^.?
IWS NO: IW/113.1? UN4VAIL
Industrial' Hygiene Walk-Through Survey
Intel Coro... Santa Clara/ CA. 21 3'
NTIS NO: P3-33-111-211 P'ICE: 59.
IWS NO: IW/113.17 UNAVAIL NIOS
ID593 Industrial Hygiena Walk-Tnrough Survey
Germanium Pomer Devices Corp.* Andov?r» MA.
1 909
NTIS NO: P3-33-133-33" P'ICE: «9.
IWS NO: IW/113.12 UNAVAIL NIOS
I060G Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Surv?y
Microjiava Associates* Inc..- Burlington*
4CJPP
NTIS NO: ??-33-155-320 P^ICE:
IWS NO: 'lW/113.11 UNAVAIL
13556 Industrial Hyqianj Walk-Through Survay Deport*
Sensor Technology* Inc.* Ch?tsj»or*. h* CA.,
March 15* 1977. 14P"
IWS H?: IW/Q53.10 UNAVAIL NI3SH
Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Survey Rs
Spactrolah* Inc.* Sylmar* CA.* March 16* 1977.
IWS N?: IW/3o3.12 UNAVAIL
A-266
-------
SU3JtCT INDEX
Industrial Hygi«n* Walk-Through Survey ?eoort,
Goticsl Coating Laboratory, Inc., City of
Industry, CA., Novenlier 2, 1=73. 21Pa
IWS NO: IW/068.16 JNAVAIL NlQSrt
Industrial Hyoien- Walk-Tnrouan Survey Report,
Motorola* Inc., Semiconductor Grouo, Phoenix,
IWS NO: !W/06cJ.15 UNAVAIL NIO
M1267 HŁTA, Inmas Corp., Colorado Springs, CO., M?y
NTIS NO: P3-3;-140
HHE NO: ;1-31°-1114 UfJAVAIL NIOSH
HETA, Milk's C a«o Industry, 3onesteel, SD., Jun3-?5-1 50-31 3 P5IC5: ly.'^
HHE NO: 33-269-1430 • UNAVSIL MOS-i
HU22 HETA, Solid State Scientific, Inc.,
Hont gomery v i 1 1 a, PA., February 1V23. 11P =
NTIS MO: P5-94-23:'-733 PRICE: 19. ?5
HHE NO: 30-123-1233 UNAVAIL NIOSH
A-267
-------
SU3JECT IVOEX REFERENCE
iIC-3679
H3349 me* Sundstr-and Data Control, Redmond* WA.
5PP
NTIS NO: P3-32-1J3-250 P*ICE: V9.9
HHŁ NO: ^0-226-761 UNOVAIL NIOSH
HETA, Syntrsx Corp., Eatontown, NJ.^ P9bru?ry
19B2. 14PP
NTIS NO: P3-,?3-1 ^^-424 PTCE: 19.9
HH5 NO: n-370-1350 UN/WAIL NIOSH
A-268
-------
SUBJECT iNDrX P.EPŁC=NCE
HETA, American Transportation Coro.,
ASH., January 1934. 51?P
NTIS NO: P3-35-179-372 PSICE:
HHE NO: 32-325-1413 UNAVAIL
HETa, FMC Cora., Tiatonx IN., August 1932.
3 ? P3
UTIS NO: Pe-'JA-UP-lOA PRICE: ^.'
HHE ND: 31-2Ł9-11o7 UNAVAIL N:OS^
MHf, ^ayes Albion Corp., So-?nc ar w il 1 a/ 0M.
17?"
NTIS NO: P3-53-102-397 ?«ICE: S^.^'
NO: 31-136-'2<. USiVJIL NIQSH
H1Q13 MHE, Hendrictcson Honu f ec tur i nq Co., Lyons, IL
opp
NTIS N3: P5-32-21 5-260 P'ICE: ^
MH= NO: =0-Oi2-?63 USAVAIL NIO
A-269
-------
SUBJECT INDEX REFERENCE
SIC-3311
H115? HŁTA, Yellow Springs Ins-truant Co.* Yelloa
Springs^ OH., 0?C9*ljar 1931. O'P
NTIS NO: P3-32-H5-950 P^TCE: S9.9
HHc N9: 31-071-1015 UNflV&IL NIOSH
A-270
-------
,RC I
OBS SIC RCGSTRD NAME
CITV=SAN JOSE
ADDRESS
CITY
ZIP JIEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CAHC
I
M
t_n
81
82
83
81
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
91
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
101
105
106
107
108
109
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
17
18
19
120
121
122
123
121
125
126
127
128
129
130
2270
1623
1761
7539
8072
8211
8222
1123
1511
1512
1512
1512
1623
1623
1711
1712
1712
1712
1712
1712
1712
1752
1752
1752
1752
1752
1761
2085
2651
2891
2911
2951
3272
3111
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
3573
OCT82
APR78
SEP77
AUG77
MAY77
SEP77
MAY78
DEC82
FEB61
JUL81
APR81
JAN81
JUN79
AUG77
SEP77
MAY80
SEP77
SEP77
MAY77
MAY78
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
AUG77
SEP77
JUN79
SEP77
AUG77
SEP77
AUG77
MAY 7 7
AUG77
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
SEP81
BURKE INDUSTRIES INC
J k W PIPELINES INC
MASON ROOFING
ADRIAN KLEIN CO
INTERNATIONAL DENTAL CERAMICS
EDISON HIGH SCHOOL
EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE
GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
SOUTH BAY CONSTRUCTION HGRS
ASBESTOS CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
WERT CONSTRUCTION
WESTERN SPECIALTY PRODUCTS
PIAZZA CONST CO
WEST VALLEYCONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY
COMFORT HEATING k AIR CONDIT10
ASBESTOS CONTROL CO
J ft J PLASTERING
MISSION PLASTERING CO
PRE FINISHED WALLBOARD CO
ROLLIE R FRENCH INC
ZASLONA PLASTERING INC
ANTHONY'S INTERIORS INC
ANTHONY'S INTERIORS INC
BENNY'S CARPET SERVICE
BENNY'S CARPET SERVICE
TERA-LITE HFC CO INC
RUSH ROOFING CO INC
PAUL MASSON VINEYARDS
AMERICAN CAN CO
DAP INC
CHEVRON USA INC
REED AND GRAHAM INC
FOREMOST-MCKESSON BLDG PRODUCT
W A CALL MFC CO INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
IBM INSTRUMENTS INC
2250 SOUTH TENTH STREET
976 STOCKTON AVE
539 MINNESOTA AVE
121 S FIRST ST
1888 SARATOGA AVE SUITE 105
1050 N 5TH ST
3095 YERBA BUENA ROAD
11711 BERRYESSA ROAD
1383 ROSALIA AVE
P 0 BOX 6161
113 MENKER AVE
1970 MONTEREY RD POB 6119
985 BLOSSOM HILL RDBOX 23550
580 MCGUNCY LN BOX 6059
152 COBLE LANE
PO BOX 7375
7180 HEATHERWOOD OR
1656 JUANITA AVE
138 PERRYMONT AVE
1060 N 5TH ST
6692 LEYLAND PARK OR
101 EAST HEDDING STREET
101 EAST HEDDING STREET
995 LONUS ST
995 LONUS ST
163 SOUTH 10TH ST
777 PARK AVE
915 STORY RD
1598 S FIRST ST
520 NO MARBURG WAY
1020 BERRYESSA RD
690 SUNOL ST BOX 5910
985 S SIXTH ST
1710 ROGERS AVE
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BHOKAW ROAD
10 WEST BHOKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
10 WEST BROKAW ROAD
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
SAN JOSE
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
95112
95110
95125
95113
95729
95112
95121
95133
95130
95150
95128
95150
95153
95008
95111
95150
95129
95111
95125
95112
95120
95112
95112
95126
95126
95112
95126
95122
95110
95133
95133
95150
95112
95712
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
951 10
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
95110
550
9
3
3
9
119
19
19
20
4
5
12
9
19
3
5
9
9
9
9
3
10
10
10
10
9
3
10
20
75
20000
9
19
9
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
too
too
100
100
100
15
5
1
3
6
2
2
33
2
1
3
7
6
20
2
<4
It
1
1
9
1
10
10
10
10
1
3
2
10
19
1
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
V
N
N
N
N
N
V
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
15
16
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1
2
3
1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
11
15
16
(SAN JOSE REGISTRANTS CONTINUED NEXT PACE)
-------
REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCLARA COUNTY
OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
> 156
K, 157
S '58
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
3644
3674
3674
3674
3829
4111
4131
4212
4212
4932
4953
4953
5013
5039
5063
5148
5148
5148
5251
5411
5531
5531
5531
5531
6142
6142
6142
6142
6142
7216
7349
7391
7394
7539
8072
8072
8072
8072
8072
8072
8073
8211
8211
8211
8211
8222
9511
3674
FFB81
APR84
OCT82
OCT84
SEPflO
MAY84
AUG77
MAR82
AUG77
AUG77
SEP77
SEP77
AUG77
JUL77
NOV81
HAR82
MAY82
MAR82
JAN83
APR82
AUG77
AUG77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
DEC84
OCT82
OCT84
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
JUL77
JUL77
JUL77
SEP77
JAN78
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
APR78
MAY78
OCT82
PIPE SHIELDS CORP
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INC
VLSI TECHNOLOGY INC
HEWLETT PACKARD
SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRANSIT
GREYHOUND LINES WEST
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL INC
RED LINE CARRIERS INC
JIM MAEZ CHEVRON
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
BAYSHORE FRICTION MATERIALS
COMMERCIAL BUILDING SUPPLY
GENERAL ELECTRIC
B/C PRODUCE INC
DEL GRANDE PRODUCE CO
ROYAL FOODS CO INC
ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE
P W SUPERMARKETS INC
ABC MOBILE BRAKE
ALLIED AUTO STORES |2
UNITED AUTO STORES
UNITED AUTO STORES
IBM CORP
IBM CORP
IBM CORP
IBM CORP
IBM CORP
CERTIFIED GARMENT & LINEN
GSA BUILDING OPERATIONS
CONDUCT IHER CORP
LEASING SYSTEMS
MOBILE BRAKE SALES AND SERVICE
CONTINENTAL DENTAL LAB
DEWHIRST DENTAL LAB
HI GRADE DENTAL LAB INC
HARU DENTAL LAB
NAMES DENTAL LABORATORY
PARK MERIDIAN DENTAL LAB
HI TEC DENTAL CERAMICS
GUNDERSON HIGH SCHOOL
LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL
SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL
WILLOW GLENN HIGH SCHOOL
SAN JOSE CITY COLLEGE
CALIF WATER SERVICE COMPANY
IMP INTERNA MICROELECTRONIC PR
- CITY=SAN JOSE CA (CONTINUED)
ADDRESS
380 TERRAINE ST
3901 NORTH FIRST ST
1849 FORTUNE DRIVE
1101 MC KAY
350 W TRIMBLE RD
1555 BERGER DR BLDG 2
70 ALMADEN AVE
757 COMMERCIAL ST
1999 S SEVENTH ST
2801 SO WHITE RD
BOX 1987
3010 2ANKER RD
1192 BAYSHORE HWY
438 PERRYMOUNT AVE
175 CURTNER AVE
1650 OLD BAYSHORE
335 E TAYLOR STREET
1325 E JULIAN ST
1555 SO SEVENTH ST
2277 ALUM ROCK AVE
666 G STOCKTON AV
1359 REDMOND AVENUE
1717 STORY ROAD
4580 ALMADEN
5600 COTTLE RD
5600 COTTLE RD
5600 COTTLE RD
5600 COTTLE RD
5600 COTTLE RD
519 HORNING
,1555 BERGER DR. , BLDG 2
2160 OAKLAND ROAD
1346 EAST TAYLOR ST
4614 PRINCE ROYAL PL
1175 SARATOGA AVE SU 2
14424 UNION AVE
1888 SARATOGA AVE SUITE 105
202 NO BASCOH AVE
898 SO SEVENTH ST
1201 PARK AVE
827 BLOSSOM HILL RD.SUITE100
622 GAUNDABERT LN
555 DANA AVE
275 N 24TH ST
2001 COriLE AVENUE
2100 MOORPARK AV
1720 NORTH FIRST ST
2830 NO FIRST STREET
CITY
ZIP IEMPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
SAN
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
JOSE
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
95110
95134
95131
95131
95131
95112
95110
95112
95112
95122
95109
95131
95112
95125
95125
95112
95112
95116
95112
95125
95126
95120
95122
95118
95193
95193
95193
95193
95193
95112
95112
95131
95133
95136
95129
95124
95129
95128
95117
95126
95123
95136
95126
95116
95125
95128
95110
95134
20
104
125
250
1500
75
49
15
19
3
49
5
4
19
499
120
5
70
10
20
1
2
9
9
999
999
999
999
999
3
500
18
9
3
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
350
350
350
19
150
20
150
15
5
a
10
2
6
4
8
2
1
4
5
4
15
490
12
5
5
2
10
1
2
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
500
1
4
1
5
2
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
4
2
5
4
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
15
20
20
20
20
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
21
21
21
15
21
15
15
15
15
1
2
3
7
15
15
15
19
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
20
-------
RCC- . _ . _HCO C I
OBS SIC RtGSTRO
179
180
181
182
183
181
165
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
191
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
> 201
" 205
Ł 206
^j 207
208
209
210
211
212
213
211
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
P21
P25
L'26
227
^28
5211
1761
3196
7996
1531
1511
1511
1711
1711
1713
1752
2822
2851
3296
3611
3611
3662
3670
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3671
3679
3679
3679
3679
3679
3679
3732
1212
1212
1391
1953
5039
7392
7397
7539
7539
7539
7539
3671
3671
OCT77
SEP77
NOV77
DEC77
SEP77
SEP77
.JUN82
FEB81
SEP77
SEP77
OCT77
JUL77
JUN77
MAY78
JUL79
JUL79
JUL79
SEP77
MAYS 3
AUG83
MAY81
MAR82
FEB81
JUN78
JUN80
JAN80
JUN81
SEP81
MAY80
FEB82
JAN78
JAN78
JAN78
JAN78
JUL77
MAR82
SEP77
AUG77
JUL77
SEP78
JUL83
SEP77
JUL83
APR83
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
SEP77
KOVB3
OCI83
NAME
PROVENZANO BROS
ALCAL ROOFING & INSULATION
KEYSTONE STEEL kWIRE CO
HARRIOTTS GREAT AMERICA
OITZ CRANE
NOR-CAL INDUSTRIAL FLOORS LIN
SCHMALTZ CONSTRUCTION CO INC
RICES PLUMBING fc HEATING
WEATHER SYSTEMS MECHANICAL INC
DELLA MAGGIORE TILE INC
ACS CARPETS k INTERIORS
FLEX FORMERS
TECHNICAL COATINGS CO
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP
HEWLETT PACKARD CO
HEWLETT PACKARD CO
VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC
MEMOREX CORP
AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC
APPLIED IMPLANT TECHNOLOGY
DEXCEL INC
FAIRCHILD CAMERA IE INSTRH CORP
GOULD ELECTRONICS
INTEL CORP
INTEL CORP
INTERSIL INC
MODERN ELECTROSYSTEHS INC
NBK CORPORATION
PRECISION MONOLITH ICS
SYNERTEK
AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC
AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC
AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC
AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC
AVANTEK INC
AVANTEK INC
LAND N1 SEA CRAFT INC
CHAS F GAGLIASSO TRUCKING SVC
PAPER TRANSPORT CO
FMC CORP
CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC
MONARCH CERAMIC TILE SALES INC
SAFETY SPECIALISTS INC
DAIALAB INC
AMERICAN AUTO
AMERICAN lUfO
AMERICAN IUTO
UNI-SERV COBILE BRAKE SERVICE
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
MICRO POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
CITV=SANTA CLARA CA •
ADDRESS
185O OELLA CRUZ BLVD
1731 GRANT ST PO BOX 210
651 WALSH AVE
2101 AGNEW ROAD BOX1776
2295 DE LA CRUZ BLVD
l|i|7 GREENWOOD DR
2378 WALSH AVE SUITE C
2301 LAFAYETTE ST
309 LAURELWOOD RD fig
868 PARKER ST
2150 SCOTT BLVD
3339 EDWARD AVE
1000 WALSH AVE
BOX 89
5301 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
5301 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
3251 OLCOTT ST
1200 MEMOREX DR
3800 HOMESTEAD ROAD
29>40 KIFER ROAD
2285 C MARTIN AVE
3105 ALFRED ST
2285 C MARTIN AVE
3065 BOWERS AVE
3065 BOWERS AVE
3250 SCOTT BLVD
2191 LAURELWOOD RD
3020 OLCOTT STREET
1500 SPACE PARK DR
3001 STENDER WAY
3800 HOMESTEAD RD
3800 HOMESTEAD RD
3800 HOMESTEAD RD
3800 HOMESTEAD RD
3175 BOWERS AVE
3175 BOWERS AVE
720 LAURELWOOD RD
BOX I4M014
751 MARTIN AVE
1185 COLEMAN AVE BX 580
715 COMSTOCK STREET
1129 RICHARD AVE
P 0 BOX 1120
2900 CORVIN DRIVE
1373 KOOSER ROAO
101 E SANTA CLARA
115 F CAMPBFI.L AVE
2019 STAATS WAY
3105 ALfRED ST
3151 JAY STREET
CITY
ZIP IEMPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SANTA
SAN1A
SANIA
SANIA
SANTA
SANTA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
Cl ARA
CLARA
CLARA
CLARA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
95050
95052
95051
95052
95050
95050
95051
95050
95050
95050
95050
95050
95050
95052
95050
95050
95050
95052
95051
95051
95050
95050
95050
95051
95051
95051
95051
95051
95050
95051
95051
95051
95051
95051
95051
95051
95050
95051
95050
95052
95050
95050
95051
95051
95113
95113
95113
95050
95050
95050
19
3
19
3
19
10
10
6
8
19
7
1
11
8
19
19
9
19
1210
100
6
2000
80
8000
8000
600
115
100
10
300
199
199
199
199
99
99
10
3
9
150
35
3
26
6
2
2
2
3
12
375
10
3
21
1
19
1
1
2
1
12
7
1
12
1
28
28
1
19
16
2
6
16
7
300
19
600
8
8
5
35
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
5
1
10
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
8
2
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
13
16
15
15
20
20
15
20
20
20
20
20
15
20
20
20
20
20
20
5
11
12
20
16
20
15
15
15
3
15
15
15
20
15
15
15
15
20
20
-------
REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCLARA COUNTY
OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS CITY
229 1799 AUCaO A R TRAMMEL!. INSULATION 14012 SOBEY MEADOWS CT SARATOGA
230 2085 JUN79 PAUL MASSON VINEYARDS 13150 SARATOGA AVE BOX 97 SARATOGA
231 8222 OCT77 WEST VALLEY JOINT COMM COLLEGE 14000 FRUIT VALE AVE
OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS
232 8222 MAR80 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 71 ENCINA HALL
233 8222 MAR80 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 71 ENCINA HALL
23<4 8922 SEP79 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHIN 290 PANAMA ST
OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME ADDRESS
SARATOGA
CITY
STANFORD CA
STANFORD CA
STANFORD CA
CITY
235 1791 OCT82 YOUNGS IRON WORKS INC 9133 DE GARHO AVENUE SUN VALLEY CA
1
KJ
VO
CD
OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS
236 3573 JUL81 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 901 THOMPSON PL 7
237 3825 JAN77 HEWLETT PACKARD CO 971 E ARQUES AVE
238 1711 DEC83 B & C INSULATION 1112 BORREGAS AVE
239 1711 AUG77 PENINSULA TRANE A/C CO 380 SAN ALESO AVE
210 1711 AUG80 VIRGIL JOHNSON HEATING * SHMTL 651 E ARQUES AVE
211 1731 JUL81 CUPERTINO ELECTRIC INC 712 EAST EVELYN AVE
212 3361 APR81 A L JOHNSON CO 1255 BIRCHWOOD DR
243 3573 JUL81 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC 915 DEGUIGNE AVE
244 3573 SEP80 AMDAHL CORPORATION 1250 E ARQUES AVE
215 3612 JUN77 WESTINCHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP HENDY AVE
246 3612 JUN77 WEST INGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP HENDY AVE
247 3674 JAN82 DATA GENERAL CORP 433 N MATHILDA AVE
248 3674 JAN80 INTERSIL INC 1276 HAMMERWOOD AVE
249 3679 APR81 EXAR INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC 750 PALOMAR AVE
250 3679 HAY81 NARDA MICROWAVE CORP 410 LAKESIDE DR
251 3761 AUG77 LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE CO 1111 LOCKHEED WAY
252 3761 AUG77 LOCKHEED MISSILES fc SPACE CO 1111 LOCKHEED WAY
253 3764 SEP77 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 1050 E AKQUES AVE BOX
254 3832 JUN77 FINNIGAN CORP 845 W MAUDE
255 3832 AUG77 FINNICAN CORP 845 WEST MAUDE AVE
CITY
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
358 SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
256 5211 APR78 PINE CONE LUMBER CO INC 695 E EVELYN AVE PO 61207 SUNNYVALE
257 7699 SEP77 ATLAS FURNACE CO 155 COMMERCIAL ST
258 3662 JUL77 CALIF MICROWAVE INC NORTH MATHILDA & WESTMAUDE AVE
259 8211 SEP77 FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DIST BOX F
260 9511 APR82 CITY OF SUNNYVALE 1444 BORREGAS AVE
SUNNYVALE
ZIP IEMPLYD
CA 95070 2
CA 95070
CA 95070
ZIP
94305
94305
94305
ZIP
91352
IEMPLYD
350
350
19
19
9
IAFECTD
2
12
4
UNION
N
Y
Y
IAFECTD UNION
2
2
i
IEMPLYD IAFECTO
100
ZIP IEMPLYO
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
990 ALMANN AVE CA
SUNNYVALE
SUNNYVALE
CA
CA
94086
94086
94089
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94088
94088
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94086
94088
94086
94086
94087
94088
a. Carcinogen-using firms in Santa Clara County registered with the Cali fornia Division of
Health, pursuant to the Occupational Carcinogen Control Act of
listings.
b. Observation number (for tabulation in this Appendix only) .
c. . Standard Industrial Classification code (for key to SIC's, see
d. Date registered.
e. Number of total employees at registered firm.
1976, as of
June, 1985.
3
999
5
9
4
30
150
3
2100
200
200
500
600
115
6
16
16
99
99
99
57
5
11
999
108
3
fAFECTD
22
1
2
4
4
4
1
3
2
6
6
25
600
12
2
4
4
50
4
4
15
1
11
5
a
N
N
Y
UNION
N
UNION
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
CARC
15
15
15
CARC
16
20
20
CARC
15
CARC
20
15
15
15
15
15
13
20
20
13
15
20
20
20
20
13
15
15
9
9
15
15
15
15
20
Occupational Safety and
May
contain
obsolete
Appendix 11).
-------
f. Number of employees potentially exposed to carcinogen.
g. Union status (yes/no): indicates whether employees belong to a union.
h. Carcinogen codes:
1 2-Acetylaminofluorene
2 4-Aminodiphenyl
3 Benzidine (and its salts)
4 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine (and its salts)
5 4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
6 alpha-Naphthylamine
7 beta-Naphthylamine
8 4-Nitrobiphenyl
9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine
10 beta-Propiolactone
11 bis-Chloromethyl Ether
12 Methyl Chloromethyl Ether
13 4.4'-Methylene bis (2Chloroaniline) (MBOCA)
14 Ethylenimine
15 Asbestos
16 Vinyl Chloride
17 Coke Oven Emissions
18 l,2-Dibromo-3Chloropropane
19 Acrylonitrile
20 Inorganic Arsenic
21 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
-------
Locnl Fire Department Contacts:
Campbell: Mike Young, (408) 866-2100
Los Gatos/
Cupertino: Ken Waldevogel, Fire Chief, (408) 378-4010
Milpitas: Patty Joki or Bob Webster, (408) 942-2383
Morgantown: Fire Chief Spenser or Sharon Coleman Skinner, (408) 779-7231
Mountain View: Frank Moe, Fire Marshall, or Maryann Izumi, (415) 966-6378
San Jose: Joe Afong, (408) 277-4659
Santa Clara: Larry Minet or Robert Campbell, (408) 984-3084
Santa Clara County: Lee Esquibel, Office of Hazardous Materials, County Depart-
ment of Public Health, (408) 299-6930
5. Kaiser-Permnnente Health Plan of Northern California.
Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan of Northern California is a comprehensive health plan
with centralized computer data bases. In 1978, Kaiser conducted a pilot study of cancer
rates among specific occupational groups in its membership. This study was primarily
performed to test the research technique, and did not generate clear-cut results. No report
was produced from the study. This type of study, however, is a potentially valuable tool
for identifying illness patterns by occupation and industry. Kaiser and other comprehenshe
health plans with members in Santa Clara County offer excellent study populations, insofar
as their data systems are extensive and centralized, their membership is largely employment
based (i.e. members join through their employer), and members remain in the health plan
over long periods of time.
For information on the Kaiser Occuptional Study contact: Dr. Robert Hiatt,
Department of Medical Methods Research, 3451 Piedmont Avenue, Oakland, CA 94611. Tele
phone: (415) 428-6713.
A-321
-------
treatment agency issues permits and does monitoring for several districts and cities. These
include Santa Clara City and San Jose, the unincorporated areas of sanitation districts 2
and 3, the Burbank and Sunol districts, and district 4 which covers Campbell, Monte
Cerrino, Los Gatos, and Saratoga. They also monitor Cupertino and Milpitas. The Center
has on file completed questionnaires data (even for companies not permitted) and permit
applications. The information they contain includes type and quantity of waste generated,
a chemical inventory, the industrial process, pretreatment systems, if appropriate, and an
SIC code. They have approximately 300 to 350 files; the questionnaires date back to the
mid-50's, but permitting did not begin before 1982. These files ae not computerized and
are not readily accessible to the public. In addition to the permit files, the Center keeps
discharge records. Again access is not readily available to the public. Any requests to see
these records or the permit files must go through the City Attorney. A summary of the
discharge records is available however in the form of an annual report.
4. Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances.
These ordinances are administered by local fire departments and, for Los Altos Hills,
Monte Sereno, Saratoga, and unincorporated areas, by the Office of Hazardous Materials in
the Santa Clara County Health Department. Under the ordinances, facilities storing
hazardous materials in quantities greater than 500 pounds in weight for solids, greater than
55 gallons for liquids, or greater than 200 cubic feet for compressed gases must obtain a
permit. To obtain a permit, a facility must submit a Hazardous Materials Inventory
statement (HMIS), with the following information: 1) for non-wastes - the generic chemical
name, common/trade name, major constituents for mixtures, the manufacturer, United
Nations (UN) or North America (NA) number, if available, and the hazard class or classes
and the material safety data sheet or equivalent information as required by the county; 2)
for wastes - the Department of Health Services manifest for wastes or equivalent
information, and the hazard class or classes; and 3) the aggregate quantity stored at a
facility. In addition, the HMIS should include a carcinogen identification form indicating
storage of any quantity of any carcinogen listed in Sections
5208-5215 and Section 5219 of Title 8 of the California Administrative Code. This
provision can be satisfied with a copy of the carcinogen registration form submitted to the
California DIR. The HMIS, with the exception of trade secrets, is public record.
The Hazardous Materials Management Plan, which must also be filed with each
application for a permit, provides the name and address of the facility, the number of
employees and the principal business activity. In case a hazardous material is stored in a
lower quantity than that specified by the HMIS, a short form HMMP can be filed - this
does not include the inventory statement but does include the carcinogen identification
form. The HMMP is public record except for trade secrets and security related
information.
The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances give the county and municipalities the
right, at their discretion, to conduct inspections to ascertain complianct with the o:di -UK...
Examination of inspection records for violations may indicate firms with potential
occupational exposures either due to direct employee exposure from storage leaks, or by
suggesting a bad actor firm, i.e. a firm whose bad record in hazardous materials storage
might indicate similar negligence in employee exposure.
The data available from individual municipalities and from the county vary, both in
terms of the current level of affected facilities reporting, and of the degree to which
records are computerized. As noted in Section 2 of this report, lack of computerization
and absence of standardized industry coding (such as SIC) limits the utility of these data.
A-320
-------
southern part of Santa Clara County), contact: 1102-A Laurel Lane, San Luis Obispo, CA
94301, telephone: (805) 549-3147.
mrA.1 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS
I Snnta Clara Countv Agricultural Commissioner's Office.
The Agricultural Commissioner keeps Pesticide Use Reports and Reports of Pesticide
Illness- (for explanations of these data, see the sections on the California Department of
Food and Agriculture in Section 2 of this report, and in this Appendix. Contact: 1553
Berges Drive, Bldg. 1, San Jose, CA 95112. Telephone: (408) 299-2171.
2. fonts Clara Center for Occupational Safety and Health (SCCOSH). the Project on
Health and Safety in Electronics (PHASE), and the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalmen
(SVTC ).
SCCOSH provides health effects information on toxic substances, supplies movies and
slides on occupational health and safety, and furnishes medical and legal referrals. The
Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition is a current SCCOSH project.
SCCOSH can also provide materials developed by PHASE. PHASE was an
independent non-profit education project working under the auspices of SCCOSH and
supported by a grant from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). In
April of 1979, PHASE established the Electronics Hazard Hotline, a confidential source of
technical information about the industry's substances and processes, assistance in
identifying potential hazards, medical and legal referrals, and help to workers in solving
health and safety problems. A N10SH Technical Report, the Hazard Assessment of the
Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry (NIOSH Publication No. 85-100) included a
report summarizing relevant data from 527 of the 700 calls received over the first 18
months of the Hotline's operation. This is an informal sample and therefore cannot be
used for any statistical conclusions, but it offers anecdotal information on the hazards of
the industry. The largest category of complaints concerned exposure to chemical
substances, primarily solvents, followed by acids and metals. The next largest category of
complaints was medical problems, including inquiries about respiratory, reproductive,
gastrointestinal, nervous system and skin problems. The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition is a
current SCCOSH project.
Contact: SCCOSH, 361 Willow St., No. 3, San Jose, CA 95110. Telephone: (408)
998-4050. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. Telephone: (415) 287-6707.
^ Local Sanitary Districts and Agencies.
Local sanitary districts, city sanitary agencies, and city coalitions in Santa Clara
County monitor industrial waste disposal to sanitary sewers. These monitoring records
form another potential data source regarding substances and quantities used in individual
firms and municipalities. Permits to discharge are actually issued by sewage treatment
Plants which are owned by the districts or cities, or privately. An example of how this
system works is the Santa Clara - San Jose Water Pollution Control Center. This sewage
A-319
-------
information on the industrial processes and materials (both type and quantity) used by the
company, could indicate potential occupational exposures. These forms cover the following
categories: Fuel Combustion Source, Semiconductor Fabrication Area, Surface
Coating/Solvent Source and Organic Liquid Evaporation. Except for the Semiconductor
form, all request a SIC code.
There are several limitations to the information provided by this source. First, not
all facilities are in compliance in possessing an emissions permit. Furthermore, the
BAAQMD's priorities lie in acquiring information to compute emissions estimates primarily
with regard to the criteria pollutants, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen, total suspended
particulates, ozon.:, :arbon monoxide and lead. Second, while the emissions data (\vhi.:h
are computed from the data forms submitted) are public record, the usage data (the actual
information on the data sheets) may not be. If a facility has designated the information a
trade secret, the permission of the facility must be asssured before these data can be
released. The BAAQMD currently has most of its files in a computerized data bank where
non-protected information is accessible by company name and by SIC. Only the
semiconductor industry information is incomplete due to a reorganization of the data
following the issuance of a new data form for the industry.
The BAAQMD has also produced a Toxics Use Survey Report (12/85) - a survey of .
874 permitted companies in the Bay Area regarding their use (yes/no) of 50 EPA/ARB
(Air Resources Board) chemicals. Of these 874 companies, 438 returned positive responses
and were then asked to provide further information, including quantity purchased (1983
only), quantity incorporated into product, and informaton on incineration. The report
gives estimated emissions for each of the 50 priority pollutants by company name, and lists
the toxic substances used by respondents by company name and 3-digit SIC Code. County
designation is included in the data. These data were not available in time for review in
this report. They could be useful in identifying" potential exposures in individual firms,
however, as they provide an inventory of toxic substance use, at least for the 50 criteria
substances among firms requiring BAAQMD permits. Contact: Steve Hill, Bay Area Air
Quality Management District, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA 94109; telephone: (415)
771-6000.
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB).
The RWQCB issues Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR), the equivalent of a permit.
for any non-sewered disposal of liquid waste. The WDR requests information on the type
and quantity of wastes and where they are discharged, and on treatment equipment, in
addition to company name and address. Furthermore, regular monitoring may be required
of a company, with periodic reports submitted to the RWQCB and the State Department of
Health Services. We were told by the principle RWQCB covering Santa Clara County
(Region 2) that it issues permits only to very large companies and that it has files for
about 30 to 40 companies, starting in 1967. The frequency of monitoring reports required
of these companies depends on the facility. Neither the WDR nor the monitoring report
information is computerized, although it is public record. We feel the usefulness of this
infomiation is limited due to the few companies permitted, noncomputerization of the files.
and the reported incompleteness of the data provided.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 2 (includes northern part of
Santa Clara County), contact: 1111 Jackson St., Room 6040, Oakland, CA 94607, telephone:
(415) 464-1255. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 3 (includes
A-318
-------
d. Numbers are too small to develop any valid risk measures.
e. Over I/10 of received illness reports are incomplete.
Since reports of work-related pesticide illness are actually a small subset of
Physician's First Reports on Occupational Injury or Illness, they offer less information tM"
is available from the latter. (See the section in this report on the Division of Labor
Statistics and Research.) However, they could be used to examine which name brands
(recorded on report) are causing the most problems and to develop appropriate warning and
educational schemes. U would also be possible 'o use the reports to analyze
occupatiou-.eiated pesticide illness in the pest control industry within the County.
For further information, contact Cliff Smith or Cindy Oshita, Department of Food
and Agriculture, Worker Health and Safety Branch, Room A316, 1220 N Street, Sacramento.
CA 95814; telephone (916) 445-8474.
Note: The above address and telephone may also be used to request information on health
effects of pesticides.
2. Pesticide Use Reports.
Quarterly summaries of reports are filed with DFA from Agricultural Commissioners
in all California counties. These reports give the name and address of the company, name
of chemical used, number of applications, number of acres covered, and total amount of
pesticide used. However, no SIC codes are included. Contact the Department of Food and
Agriculture, 1220 N Street, Room A-414, Sacramento, CA 95814.
3. Pesticide Registration.
Contact Pesticide Registration, 1220 N Street, Room A-I51, Sacramento, CA 95814;
telephone (916) 322-5130.
CALIFORNIA HEALTH FACILITIES COMMISSION (CHFO.
The CHFC receives information on each patient discharged from hospitals in
California. Data include diagnosis and length of stay, but omit cause of disease and
occupation or industry of patient. Also, there is presently no way to detect repeat
patients. If occupation and industry were included in discharge reports, along with
identifiers to detect repeat patients, these data would conceivably be useful in observing
hospicaijzation and disease patterns among occupations and industries.
JAY ARFA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (BAAONfDV
The BAAQMD compiles some data of interest in assessing occupational health risks in
Santa Clara County. In issuing permits to emission sources, the BAAQMD requires certain
data forms be completed and filed with the District. Four of these forms, by providing
A-317
-------
7. Hnzardous Waste Information System (HWTS).
This system is maintained by the Toxic Substances Control Division. Any facility
transporting hazardous waste or storing it over 50 days must file a Uniform Hazardous
Waste Manifest, both with the state and with EPA, Sacramento maintains hard copy files
on companies that completed manifests prior to 1983 and computerized files after 1983.
Each file contains an EPA identification number, a manifest number, an SIC code, the
kind and quantity of waste, and county where it was generated. The HWIS is public
record. A list of generators of hazardous waste for a given county can be provided by
the HWIS upon written request. Contact DOHS, Toxic Substances Control Division, 714 P
Street, Saciamento, CA 95814. Telephone. (916) 324-1826.
DATA AVAILABLE FROM CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND
AGRICULTURE (DFAl
1. Pesticide Illnesses and Investigations.
This computerized database is maintained by the Worker Health and Safety Unit, a
bureau of the DFA Division of Pest Management, Environmental Protection, and Worker
Safety. The database is developed from reports of illness investigations made by the
County Agricultural Commissioner, based on physician's reports.
Statistics are tabulated and published in annual reports on pesticide illness in
California. The state total is broken down in the report to show the number of reports
from each county. The most recent report available is the "Summary of Reports from
Physicians of Illnesses That Were Possibly Related to Pesticide Exposure During the Period
January 1 -December 31, 1984, in California", HS-1304, April 14, 1985.
This report lists pesticide illnesses (the number of cases) in California by job and
type of illness (eye, skin, eye and skin, or systemic), including hospitalization and
disability days. A breakdown is made according to whether occupational or not, and
according to the likelihood that the illness was in fact pesticide-related (definite, probable,
possible, unlikely). There is also a detailed breakdown of illnesses by specific pesticide
name. Total number of cases in each County is listed, along with the number
agriculturally related. (In Santa Clara County, a total of 27 cases were reported, with 6
being agriculturally related; the state totals were 1,156 and 757, respectively.)
Because the database is computerized, it is also possible to obtain special tabulations
not shown in the report.
This database offers very specific tabulations of illnesses, occupations, and individual
pesticides. It is limited in several respects of comparing pesticides with other hazards by
industry These limitations include:
a. Job title recorded is not part of any standard occupational classification scheme.
b. Industry classification is limited to either "agriculture" or "nonagriculture" (there is no
SIC coding).
c. It relies on physician's or patient's recognition of work-relatedness in order for an
illness to be coded as occupational in origin.
A-316
-------
4. California Tumor Registry.
The Registry, operated by the DOHS Resource for Cancer Epidemiology, collects and
evaluates information on occurrences of cancer in San Francisco Bay Area Counties, not
including Santa Clara County. The data are abstracted from medical records and death
certificates. The Registry currently processes about 25,000 records, representing 13,000
cases annually. The problems with this data base are similar to those with the Birth
Defects data in that occupation and indusry data are either not available on the medical
records and death certificates, or they are not wholly transferred into the tumor registry
files Furthermore, the Californn ^ath certifirite asks for "hst occupation", not usual
occupation. The limited availability of occupational and indusuy data in both the Birth
Defects and Tumor Registries stems from the fact that they were designed to determine
the incidence of birth defects and cancer and not to identify occupational health hazards.
A number of occupationally related cancer studies have been done based on Los
Angeles cancer surveillance programs. Hypotheses may be drawn from these studies that
could be applicable to similar industries in Santa Clara. An example of the use of cancer
surveillance programs (and death certificates) to identify occupational disease is a study by
Dr. Robert Dubrow and Dr. David H. Wegman, "Setting Priorities for Occupational Cancer
Research and Control: Synthesis of the Results of Occupational Disease Surveillance
Studies", Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Vol. 71, No. 6, December 1983,
11:3-1142.
Information on the Tumor Registry can be obtained from California DOHS, Resource
for Cancer Epidemiology, 714 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 445-0932.
5. California Death Files.
The Death Files are maintained by the DOHS Department of Vital Statistics and are
based on death certificates, which, as already mentioned, ask for "occupation". The DOHS
processes about 190,000 death records a year. Use of these files for occupational disease
surveillance is limited, however, by frequently inaccurate reporting of occupation, the
absence of routine coding and computerization of occupation and industry variables from
the death certificates, and the non-inclusion of multiple causes of death. Contact Da%e
Mitchell, DOHS, Vital Statistics, (916) 445-2684.
6- Occupational Mortality Project.
The Health Data and Statistics Branch of the Rural and Community Health Division
of DOHS is developing standard mortality ratios for industries and occupations. The study
covers all California death certificates from 1979-1981 for decedents 16 to 64 years old.
The data coded include county of residence, industry by 4-digit SIC, cause of death using
ICD classification, and occupation using Department of Commerce classifications. We were
told the report and a computerized tape will be available to the public by early summer,
but that the occupational codes are "woefully inadequate" in describing job categories in
the electronics industry in Santa Clara County. Contact Gwendolyn Doebbert, Chief of
Health Demographics, at Health Data and Statistics Branch, Rural and Community Health
Division, Division of Health Services, 714 P Street, Room 1476, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Telephone: (916) 445-1010.
A-315
-------
routinely available. To obtain reports or to inquire about unpublished data, contact Karen
Jones or Leslie Clements (see "California Work Injuries and Illnesses" section above for
address and telephone).
DATA AVAILABLE FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
)HS
1. General Information.
Inquiries regarding the Epidemioloeical Studies Section of DOHS, including questions
related to epidemiological studies and field investigations, should be addressed to California
DOHS, Epidemiological Studies Section, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704. Telephone:
(415) 540-2669.
Inquiries regarding the Radioloeic Health Branch, including questions about radiologic
health effects and materials handling, should be addressed to California DOHS, Radiologic
Health Branch, 714 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 445-0931.
Information on hazardous waste control can be obtained from DOHS, Toxic
Substances Control Division, 714 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916)
324-1826.
2. Health Effects of Toxic Substnnces.
Health Effects of Toxic Substances is a directory of references and resources
published by the Community Toxicology Unit (in the Epidemiological Studies Section of
DOHS), can be obtained by writing the California Department of General Services,
Publications Section, P.O. Box 1015, North Highlands, CA 95660. Pub. No. 7540-958-1300-3.
3. California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBDMP).
This program is operated by the DOHS Epidemiological Studies Section. Starting in
1983, the CBDMP has been conducting a birth defects registry and cluster identification
and investigation program. The Program covers six Bay Area counties, including Santa
Clara. Presently there are 6,000 to 10,000 records processed annually, representing 3,000 to
5,000 cases. The information on the registry is abstracted from medical reports and birth
and fetal death certificates which request occupation and industry. These data are of
limited value however in identifying occupational causal factors as entries on occupation
and industry are not routinely transfered from the birth certificates and are frequently
not available from the medical records. Even when the data are available, they may be
misleading; for example, the occupation listed on entry to the hospital may not be the
patient's usual occupation. Also occupational titles are frequently nonspecific, as in
"laborer" or "technician". For information, contact the Epidemiological Studies Section, 215;
Berkeley Way, Berkely, CA 94704. Telephone: (415) 540-2669.
A-314
-------
AVAILABLE FROM DLSR ILLNESS REPORTING SYSTEMS
1. Occupational Injuries and Illness Survey. California.
The suney is published annually and is based on employer maintained logs kept to
satisfy section 14301 of Title 8 of the California Administrative Code. Tables in the
report include total cases of occupational illness by detailed industry, according to number
of cases with lost work days and number of lost work days, rates for the same tabulations
per '0^ worker*, and time trends by detailed industry for aggregated injuries and illnesses.
shoeing changes acioss six >ears. Jo obtain reports, contact ivaien Jones, DLiK, P.O. Bw .
603, San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone: (415) 557-3746.
2. California \Vork Injuries and Illnesses.
This publication, also annual, is based on Employer's Reports of Occupational Injur;.
and Illness (DLSR form 5020). The most recent data available are for 1984. Data in the
report include disabling illnesses (i.e. resulting in one or more full days or shifts absent
from time beyond the date of illness or injury) by industry; total major disabling
occupational illness by source; total disabling occupational illness by type and part of bod\
affected; total disabling work illnesses by length of service with employer; total disabling
work illnesses by accident type; total disabling injuries and illnesses (aggregated) by sex;
total disabling occupational illness by occupation; disabling illnesses and injuries
(aggregated) by county; and total fatal and nonfatal injuries and illnesses (aggregated) by
year; as well as other data not specifically related to occupational illness.
The database summarized by the annual report also contains numerous more detailed
tables which the report does not include. In addition, various cross tabulations can be
produced from the database for which prefabricated tables exist (e.g. local statistics for a
given county). Such unpublished data are not routinely available to the public, but may
be provided in special circumstances. To obtain reports or inquire about unpublished dat^.
contact Karen Jones or Josephine Tao, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone
(415) 557-3746.
3. Occupational Disease in California.
This report is usually published annually, though no published reports exist for 1980
or 1981. The most recent data published are for 1983. The source for this report is the
Doctor's First Report of Occupational Injury or Illness.
Tables include percentage distributions of occupational disease reports by county and
by major industry, and various breakdowns of disease group, industry causal agent,
estimated lost work time and hospitalization, county, and age and sex. Also included are
total fatalities attributed to occupational disease by cause, taken from other worker's
compensation data, and total pneumoconiosis deaths by cause, taken from death certificates
Hied with the Department of Health Services (see the section in this report on Department
of Health Services).
Tabulations are contained on the database from Doctor's First Reports which are not
included in the published report. As with data from the Employer's Reports, these
unpublished tables, and other tabulations- not already performed by DLSR, are not
A-313
-------
Occupational Safety and Health
Standards Board
• Variance Procedures Before the Occupational
Safety and Health Standards Board (pamphlet)
• Proposed Regulations (monthly notice of
changes to Cal/OSHA regulations)
Occupational Safety and Health
Appeals Board
• Rules of Practice and Procedure Before the
Occupational Safety and Health Appeals
Board (booklet)
Cal/OSHA Consultation Service
• Consultation for Job Safety and Health (flyer)
• Employer Guide to the Material Safety Data
Sheet Regulations (booklet)
• Evaluation of Effective Safety and Health
Programs (ninnunl)
• On Site Consultation (booklet)
• Small Employer Voluntary Compliance
Program (flyer)
• Workplace Injury and Illness Prevention
Guide (booklet)
special interest reprints:
• Access to Employee Exposure and Medical
Records
Asbestos Regulations
Carcinogens Regulations
Confined Space Regulations
Control of Noise Exposures
DBCP Regulations
Hazardous Substances Information and
Training Law
Inorganic Arsenic Regulations
Lead Regulations and Appendices
Material Safety Data Sheets
Respiratory Protective Equipment
Division of Apprenticeship
Standards
• APPRENTICESHIP NEWS (quarterly newsletter)
• Apprenticeship in California (booklet)
•pecial interest pamphlets:
• Apprenticeship: A Mutual Investment
• Apprenticeship Pays ;
• Why Not Consider Apprenticeship (Nursing)
• Your Appi titlicviltip Committee
State Itfediction and Conciliation
Service
• Mediation/Conciliation Service: Duties, Respon-
sibilities, Services (booi
-------
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PUBLICATIONS
Address publication requests to the specific
division, board, service or office-c/o Post
Office Box 603, San Francisco, California
94101.
Office of the Director
• California Department of Industrial Relations:
What It Is and What It Does (brochure)
Division of Labor Statistics and
Research
industrial relations research repor ts;
• California Industrial Relations Reports (doi.iilixl
studies of specific topics included in collective
bargaining agreement*)
• Provisions of Collective Bargninini< Aftrcernvnts
(biennial)
• Provisions of County and City negotiated Labor
Agreements in California (biennial)
• Union Labor in California (biennial)
• Wage Settlements in California (annu.il)
occupational injury and
• Promptness o/ Firtl Payments. Workers' Com-
pensation Benefits (scmi-anrvi.-! index'
e Medical Bureau factshects: Guidelines for
Mt-dic.il Examination and Report; How to
Culled Medical Dills When the Insurance
Company Will Not Pay; How to Get Yuur Hill
Paid
Self'Insurance Plans
• Rules and Regulations Governing, Wurkers'
Compensation Self-Insurance Plans
Divioion of Occupational Safety
and Health
• CALIOSHANEWS (quarterly newsleitrr)
• Safety and Health Protection on thejn'i
(po»ter- English, Spanisli)
• GuidetoCAL/OSHA (booklet)
• factshects: An Outline for Planning nnd lmp!t-
menting Effective Employee Training- Hu.v rv
Set Up a Health and S.tfery Committee Set-
ting Up a Tailgate Safety Mitt-nn,^
special interest pomp/Urts:
• Electrical Safety
• Farm Safety Check List (English Spii\tsli)
• Guide to the Construction Industry
• How to Protect Your Health jnd Safety on /lie
Job. A Worker's Guide (Enpliih Sponisli)
• Job-Related Cancer: Huw VouCun Help
Prevent It
• Lockout ID lockout
Manulncturin^ Guide
Occupation.^ Noise Control
Order Blank for Title 8 Safety Orders
Preventing Buck Injuries (English. Spanish)
Respiratory Hrntvction ProŁr;im
Safety and Health Films
Trench and E\cavation Safety- Guitie
Working Safely with Toxic Substances
-A-311-
-------
-cfll/OSHR Communication.
publication/ il/t
CAL/OSHA NEWS - a quarterly publication
CAL/OSHA Poster - Safety 4 Health Protection on the Job
x '
Semiconductor Industry Study (292-paged Technical Report - $5.00
charge)
Pamphlets
S-l Guide to CAL/OSHA
S-6 Permits
S-7 Order Blank for Title 8 Safety Orders
S-9 Safety & Health Film Catalogue
S-20 How to Protect Your Health & Safety on the Job
A Worker's Guide (English t Spanish)
S-201 Farm Safety Check List (English & Spanish)
S-205 Working Safely with Pesticides (English & Spanish)
S-300 Guide to the Construction Industry
S-358 Trench & Excavation Safety Guide
S-400 Manufacturing Guide
S-502 Operating Rules for Industrial Trucks & Industrial
Cow Tractors (Inglish & Spanish)
S-508 Preventing Back Injuries (English & Spanish)
S-515 Lockout/Blockout
S-520 Circular Power Saw Safety
S-550 Electrical Safety
S-600 Airborne Contaminants
S-607 Working Safely with Toxic Substances
S-620 Resources List and Standard for Asbestos
S-630 Respiratory Protection Program
S-640 Job-related Cancer: How You Can Help Prevent It
S-680 Occupational Noise Control
Placards
S-ll Access to Medical & Exposure Records (English & Spanish)
S-500 Emergency Numbers!
S-503 Operating Rules for Industrial Trucks (English & Spanish)
S-504 Agricultural/Industrial Tractors (English & Spanish)
S-507 How to Lift (English & Spanish)
Tailgate Topics
Tl Accident i Illness Prevention Program
T2 . Multi-Pioce Rim Wheels
T3 Power Pross Safety
A-3'lO-
-------
of actual carcinogen users. During 1985, the OCCU endeavored to update and verify
registrations, but the success of this effort was not evaluated for this report. A list of
firms which have registered carcinogen use in Santa Clara County is shown in Appendix 9
For other information on carcinogen registration, contact the Occupational Carcinogens
Control Unit, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, P.O. Box 603, 3rd Floor, San
FnnJsco. CA 9410: Telephone: (415) 557-2037.
4. Scheduled Health Inspections List (SHI).
Vhis list is prepared from the Health Inspection Plan (hi.-'j of fedcial OSHA, a
method used to select industries with the greatest potential for health problems. The
current SHI list, which took effect December 1985, is based on previous years of federal
OSHA health inspection experience. A ratio is calculated between the number of serious
violations found and the number of inspections conducted within each industry (SIC) by
federal OSHA industrial hygienists throughout the nation. Industries are then ranked from
the highest to lowest ratio. The SHI list contains this ranking of SIC's; within each SIC,
the number of serious violations per OSHA health inspection is listed for each standard,
and individual establishment names (e.g. in California) are obtained from the Dun
Marketing Services mailing list.
In order to focus inspection efforts more sharply on industries where high exposures
would be found, OSHA modified the HIP system by introducing an abbreviated list of 119
substances which inspections over the preceding five years had shown to be at or abo'.e
50% of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) in at least 15% of the samples taken across
all industries. This list was then used to develop Industry Weighted Indices.
5. Consultation Service.
Santa Clara County requests for Consultation Service Evaluations of worksites or
publications should be directed to the Emeryville office. Telephone:
(415) 658-0900.
6. Standards. Pamphlets, and other CAL/OSHA Literature.
Reprints of individual standards (from the California Administrative Code), as well
as other educational literature are available from the CAL/OSHA Public Information
Office, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 91401. Specific questions on standards can also
be directed to the DOSH Research and Standards Development Unit at the same address;
telephone (415) 557-2037. Copies of the CAL/OSHA publications list and the DIR
publications list are shown below; the DIR list includes publications related to the
Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board, the Occupational Safety and Health
Standards Board, DLSR and other DIR Divisions.
A-309
-------
system by including additional data. The system is planned to be operational by
the end of 1986 and will greatly improve access to data from CAL/OSHA
inspections, including exposure monitoring levels. Contact the CAL/OSHA Program
Office or the Management Information Unit, DIR, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco,
CA 94101. Telephone: (415) 557-1155 (Program Office) or (415) 557-2037 (MIU).
d. District Office Inspection Files
The computerized files currently do not contain data on monitored exposure levels.
or on hazards evaluated at a particular firm. This type of information is
available for Santa Clara Coumy at the San Jose district uffice. The actual
inspection files, containing inspection records, lab reports, exposure monitoring
data, and information collected in the course of inspection, are kept in the
District Office. Contact Milton Terry, Acting District Manager of the San Jose
District Office, at 88 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95112. Telephone: (408) 277-1260.
3. Dnta from the Carcinogen Registration List.
The Occupational Carcinogens Control Act of 1976 (California Health and Safety
Code Sees. 24200 et seq.) requires all users of substances regulated by the state as
carcinogenic to register their use with DOSH. Information on carcinogen registrants is
available on microfiche. Substances currently subject to the registration requirement are as
follows:
Asbestos
Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene)
Coke Oven Emissions
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) Acrylonitrile
4,4'Methylene(bis) 2-chloroaniline (MOCA)
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
Ethylene Oxide (EtO)
2-Acetylaminofluorene (2-AAf)
4-Aminodiphenyl (4-ADP)
Benzidine and its salts
bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME)
3,3'Dichlorobenzidine and its salts (DCB)
4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene (Methyl Yellow)
alpha-Naphthylamine (1-NA)
beta-Naphthylamine (2-NA, BNA)
4-Nitrobiphenyl (4-NBP, PNB)
n-nitrosodimethylamine (dmn, dmna)
beta-Propiolactone (Betaprone, BPL)
Methyl Chloromethyl Ether (CMME)
Ethyleneimine (El, Aziridine)
Inorganic Arsenic
The computerized registration database contains company name, address, chemical(s)
registered, number of employees affected, location in plant, number of employees total, SIC
and whether the workers are represented by a local union.
Prior to 1985, the state did not check registrations once they had been made, or
ensure in a systematic way that new firms or users become registered. Consequently, the
list contained many defunct firms and obsolete listings, while omitting ah unknown number
A-308
-------
The State Program Quarterly Evaluation Report contains total inspections, health
inspections, employees covered, serious violations, non-serious violations, penalties
(total dollars) proposed for serious violations and non-serious violations, and
consultation visits by 2-digit SIC code. It also contains other statewide summary
data, and a log of standards variances requested, with company name and status
(granted, denied, etc.).
It should be noted that these reports are principally developed for state program
•valuation by OSHA 3nd by state agencies and officials, and except for variance
logs, contain no local data or detailed industry data.
To inquire about reports, contact the CAL/OSHA Program Office, P.O. Box 603.
San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone: (415) 557-1155.
b. DOSH Inspection and Cirtion Files.
More particular data on local inspections, citations, and monitored exposure levels
can be obtained from the DOSH computerized inspection and citation database
from which the above summary reports are derived. The database includes two
files:
1) CAL/OSHA Inspection File. This file is created from CAL/OSHA 1 forms.
the standard forms completed by all DOSH compliance industrial hygienists
and safety engineers for each inspection completed. The file includes details
of the inspection type, company name, address and SIC, the number of
employees affected by the inspection, the reason for the inspection (accident.
complaint, etc.), the extent of the inspection, regional and county codes, and
compliance status. This file does not include information on citations issued or
industrial hygiene samples taken. Four-digit SICs are recorded for each
company.
2) CAL-OSHA Citation File. This file includes one record for every citation
issued for inspections by CAL-OSHA inspectors. Since the citations are often
filed some time after completion of the inspection, there may not be perfect
correspondence between this file and the CAL-OSHA inspection file for the
same years. There is often more than one citation for a given inspection.
Besides the identification numbers which match the citation with an
inspection, this file contains the citation type, the code violated, the standard
violated, and the subparagraph of that standard. The citation records must be
matched with the inspection records in order to attach the citation
information to an SIC, a county or a company.
To inquire about data from these files, or for further information, contact the
Chief of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Department of
Industrial Relations, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 94101; telephone: (415)
557-2037. It should be noted that these computer data are a management tool.
and are not routinely available to the public.
c. IMIS Management Information System.
Federal OSHA is funding a new computerized system to record inspection and
citation data now kept in the DOSH files above. The state will augment this
A-307
-------
DATA AVAILABLE FROM CAL/OSHA
1. Data on Toxic Substances and Henlth Effects.
a. HESIS.
Information on particular toxic substances and health effects, as well as proper
control procedures and health monitoring, is available from HESIS, 2151 Berkeley
Way, Berkeley, CA 94704; telephone (415) 540-3014. This information includes
published toxicity 'jumrmries (e.g. EDB, Glycol Ethers, Methy!f»ne Chloride, and
Ethylene Oxide), and the Hazard Alerts issued for EDB, Glylcol Ethers, and
Ethylene Oxide, as well as searches using the HESIS library or any of the 350
computer data bases to which HESIS subscribes. All services are confidential and
free of charge.
b. Special Studies Reports.
Data on methods of use and exposure levels for some hazards in selected
industries for which special studies have been performed (e.g. etheyiene oxide in
hospitals, spice plants, and medical products industries) are available from the
DOSH Special Studies Unit. Other Special Studies reports include glycol ethers
and EDB. In Northern California contact CAL/OSHA Special Studies Unit, 1525
Shattuck Avenue, Berkeley. Telephone: (415) 540-3037.
c. MSDS Data.
Information on hazardous constituents of manufactured chemical products is
available from the DOSH Right to Know Unit. This information, gathered from
manfacturers' material safety data sheets (MSDS's) is accessible by manufacturer's
name, address (including zip code), chemical name, chemical abstact number (CAS
number), and trade name of substance or product. Limitations of this source are 1)
only manufacturer's, not users, must file MSDS's, 2) there are no health data on
the computerized file, and 3) the state has not received MSDS's from all
manufacturers, nor are all MSDS's complete (up to 90% may contain omissions).
Contact the Right to Know Unit (address and telephone are the same as the
Special Studies Unit).
2. Enforcement and Compliance Data.
a. CAL/OSHA Program Office Summaries
The Department of Industrial Relations produces quarterly summaries of
compliance, consultation, and standards activities. These include the summary of
compliance activity relating to the California Occupational Safety and Health Plan,
and the State Program Quarterly Evaluation Report. The Summary contains
information on total DOSH compliance inspections, total carcinogen-related
inspections, total inspections made by compliance industrial hygienists by type (e.g.
complaint) and by major industry (e.g. manufacturing), the total number of
employees affected by health inspections, percentage of establishments found in
compliance, total violations found (serious vs. non-serious), total penalties proposed.
and total manhours expended.
A-306
-------
This system produces four results: 1) a hazard risk index for each chemical,
indicative of the relative toxicological risk of that chemical as compared to the other IOCO;
2) an adjusted hazard risk index which takes into account national population as well as
toxicological risk; 3) an industry risk index which ranks SICs according to the potential
risk due to chemical exposure of workers in each industry, and an occupational risk index
which does the same for occupations.
DATA AVAILABLE FROM EPA UNDER THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT
(TSCA).
1. Pul-'icntions.
EPA publications related to occupatonal health include the Chemical Substances
Information Resources Handbook, and the TSCA Chemicals in Progress Bulletin (published
bimonthly). The handbook is a chemical information resources guide to bibliographic
search systems, computerized data systems, chemical lists, and relevant publications.
The bulletin presents new reporting rules had rquirements, and the list of
premanufacture notices (PMN's) for production of specific chemicals by chemical
manufacturers. For further information write to the Industry Assistance Office, TS-799
EPA, Washington, D.D. 20460, or call (800) 424-9065.
2. The Chemical Substances Information Network.
The Chemical Substances Information Network is a collection of databases containing
chemical and toxicological information. For further information on gaining access to the
databases, contact Dalton Tidwell, U.S. EPA, Toxicology, (301) 496-6531.
3. Chemical Data.
EPA releases aggregated data on production, uses, and workers exposed for each
chemical covered by TSCA. For information, call (800) 424-9065.
4. Manufacturing Data.
EPA also releases information on firms or plant sites which
manufacture or process a toxic chemical, except when such information is considered
confidential. For information, call (800) 424-9065.
A-305
-------
series of files which allow the user to access the data by industry (4-digit SIC),
occupation (1970 census), and/or hazard (2000 substances), as well as type and
duration of exposure, etc. There are a series of more than twenty different
formats in which printouts of the data may be requested. This data base is not
available on computer tape. There are no monitored exposure levels reflected in
the database, as no environmental monitoring was performed.
The development and results of the survey have been published by NIOSH in
three volumes: I. NOHS Survey Manual. II. NOHS Dnta Editing and Data Base
Development, and III. NOHS Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables. Single
copies are available from Publications Dissemination, Division of Technical
Services, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
b. National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES)
NOES was an expanded version of the NOHS procedure for certain selected
industries. The survey was completed in 1984, but is not yet published.
3. The "Occupational Safety and Health (N1OSHV* File.
This file of computerized data contains 106,000 records from 1973 to the present on a
wide range of topics, including epidemiology, medical monitoring of workers, sampling and
analytical methods, and toxicology. Access to this file on particular topics may be obtained
through libraries or private parties who subscribe to the file.
4. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS).
RTECS consists of all chemical substances with reported toxicity in the literature for
any of a variety of toxicity tests. There is toxicity information on over 57,000 chemicals
compiled from the literature and not critically evaluated.
The data include both acute and chronic toxicity measurements; primary skin and e\e
irritant data; and carcinogen, mutagen, and tumorigen data. There is one record for each
type of test for each chemical. The record contains the lowest dose reported in the
literature and the reference.
The data may be accessed through the Chemical Information System (CIS), a national
computer linkage to over ten databases supported by NIH and EPA, or on microfiche
which are updated annually. Most science libraries subscribe to CIS and also receive the
microfiche.
5. NOHS-RTECS Model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational
Groups.
This data analysis system links data from RTECS on toxicity of substances
with data from NOHS on potential exposure of worker groups to those substances. There
were 2092 chemical substances in the NOHS for which there were sufficient toxicity data
in RTECS. The data on worker exposures to those chemicals have been compiled into 4
files according to 2, 3, or 4 digit SIC codes or 1970 census codes. The largest file has
56,206 separate exposure groups on the 4 digit SIC level.
A-304
-------
4. OSHA Documents.
Pamphlets and other materials can be obtained from the OSHA
Office of Public Affairs (see below) or from any OSHA office. The Region IX address is
Box 36017, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Telephone: (415) 556-949"
5. Standards.
OSHA standards are published in the Federal Register, and can be found
under the date of adoption, or obtained from an> OSHA office or the OSHA OffL's of
Public Affairs: Department of Labor, OSHA, Office of Public Affairs, Third Street and
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room N-3641, Washington, D.C. 20210. Telephone: (202)
523-8151.
DATA AVAILABLE FROM NTOSH
1. Documents and Reports.
Most Health Hazard Evaluations, Control Technology reports, Industrywide Reports.
Criteria Documents, contract reports, and special reports are available from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161
Telephone: (703) 487-4780 to check for availability, (703) 487-4650 to order documents.
(For a description of the various report types, see Section 2.2 on NIOSH.) A
comprehensive listing of NIOSH publications is contained in the NIOSH Publications
Catalog, which lists reports by type and by subject. The latest catalog is the 6th edition.
published 8/84. The catalog is available from Publications Dissemination, Division of
Standards Development and Technology Transfer, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. Telephone: (513) 841-4287. Many NIOSH documents can also be
obtained from Publications Dissemination.
2. Hazard Survevs.
a. The National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS).
The NOHS was a national data gathering effort designed to provide baseline
descriptive information on potential occupational exposures. A stratified random
sample of approximately 5,000 establishments in 67 metropolitan areas throughout
the United States was selected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department
of Labor. The sample represents all non-agricultural businesses covered under the
OSH Act of 1970. The sample was deliberately biased toward establishments with a
relatively high number of employees due to the costs and logistics of the survey.
The survey data were gathered from 1973 to 1974.
The survey consisted of two parts: an interview with the management about health
and safety policies and programs and a walk-through of the establishment. During
the walk-through, the occupation, number of workers, potential exposures, and an>
control measures in force were recorded for each group of workers performing the
same operation. Exposures were designated as half or full time. The result vos n
A-303
-------
series of files which allow the user to access the data by industry (4-digit SIC),
occupation (1970 census), and/or hazard (2000 substances), as well as type and
duration of exposure, etc. There are a series of more than twenty different
formats in which printouts of the data may be requested. This data base is not
available on computer tape. There are no monitored exposure levels reflected in
the database, as no environmental monitoring was performed.
The development and results of the survey have been published by NIOSH in
three volumes: I. NOHS Survey Manual. II. NOHS Data Editing and Data Bnse
Development, and III. NOHS Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables. Single
copies are available from Publications Dissemination, Division of Technical
Services, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
b. National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES)
NOES was an expanded version of the NOHS procedure for certain selected
industries. The survey was completed in 1984, but is not yet published.
3. The "Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSHV1 File.
This file of computerized data contains 106,000 records from 1973 to the present on a
wide range of topics, including epidemiology, medical monitoring of workers, sampling and
analytical methods, and toxicology. Access to this file on particular topics may be obtained
through libraries or private parties who subscribe to the file.
4. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS).
RTECS consists of all chemical substances with reported toxicity in the literature for
any of a variety of toxicity tests. There is toxicity information on over 57,000 chemicals
compiled from the literature and not critically evaluated.
The data include both acute and chronic toxicity measurements; primary skin and e\e
irritant data; and carcinogen, mutagen, and tumorigen data. There is one record for each
type of test for each chemical. The record contains the lowest dose reported in the
literature and the reference.
The data may be accessed through the Chemical Information System (CIS), a national
computer linkage to over ten databases supported by NIH and EPA, or on microfiche
which are updated annually. Most science libraries subscribe to CIS and also receive the
microfiche.
5. NOHS-RTECS Model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational
Groups.
This data analysis system links data from RTECS on toxicity of substances
with data from NOHS on potential exposure of worker groups to those substances. There
were 2092 chemical substances in the NOHS for which there were sufficient toxicity data
in RTECS. The data on worker exposures to those chemicals have been compiled into 4
files according to 2, 3, or 4 digit SIC codes or 1970 census codes. The largest file has
56,206 separate exposure groups on the 4 digit SIC level.
A-304
-------
4. OSHA Documents.
Pamphlets and other materials can be obtained from the OSHA
Office of Public Affairs (see below) or from any OSHA office. The Region IX address is
Box 36017, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Telephone: (415) 556-949'
5. Standards.
OSHA standards are published in the Federal Register, and can be found
undci the date of adoption, or obtained from an> OSHA office or the OSHA Office of
Public Affairs: Department of Labor, OSHA, Office of Public Affairs, Third Street and
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room N-3641, Washington, D.C. 20210. Telephone: (202)
5:3-8151.
DATA AVAILABLE FROM NIOSH
1. Documents and Reports.
Most Health Hazard Evaluations, Control Technology reports. Industrywide Reports.
Criteria Documents, contract reports, and special reports are available from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
Telephone: (703) 487-4780 to check for availability, (703) 487-4650 to order documents.
(For a description of the various report types, see Section 2.2 on NIOSH.) A
comprehensive listing of NIOSH publications is contained in the NIOSH Publications
Catalog, which lists reports by type and by subject. The latest catalog is the 6th edition,
published 8/84. The catalog is available from Publications Dissemination, Division of
Standards Development and Technology Transfer, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. Telephone: (513) 841-4287. Many NIOSH documents can also be
obtained from Publications Dissemination.
2. Hazard Survevs.
a. The National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS).
The NOHS was a national data gathering effort designed to provide baseline
descriptive information on potential occupational exposures. A stratified random
sample of approximately 5,000 establishments in 67 metropolitan areas throughout
the United States was selected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department
of Labor. The sample represents all non-agricultural businesses covered under the
OSH Act of 1970. The sample was deliberately biased toward establishments with n
relatively high number of employees due to the costs and logistics of the survey.
The survey data were gathered from 1973 to 1974.
The survey consisted of two parts: an interview with the management about health
and safety policies and programs and a walk-through of the establishment. During
the walk-through, the occupation, number of workers, potential exposures, and an>
control measures in force were recorded for each group of workers performing the
same operation. Exposures were designated as half or full time. The result was a
A-303
-------
Drug Available from OSHA
OSHA maintains computerized files on a wide range of topics. The data contained in
these files encompasses OSHA enforcement activities, standards interpretations, toxicology
of various substances, and methods for controlling hazards. Specific files include, but are
not limited to the following:
1. The OSHA Computerized Information System (OCIS).
The system contains four data sets: a) the Standards Interpretation File, containing
instructions clarifying OSHA standards requirements for specific hazards; b) the Hazard
Abatement File, containing abstracts of control methods for specific hazards and
conditions; c) the Variance File, listing those companies which have obtained specific
standards variances from OSHA; and d) the Chemical Information File, summarizing
industrial hygiene information related to over 400 chemicals. These files have recently
been made available online at OSHA regional offices.
The regional office for California (Region IX) is located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue.
Box 36017, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone: (415) 556-0586.
2. OSHA Health Inspection Plan fHIPV
This database analyzes industries based on the hazardous materials they use and the
toxicity of these materials. Reports available from this database contain rankings of over
600 types of business enterprises according to degree of overall hazardousness, as
determined through a ranking system known as the OSHA Weighted Index (OWI). Also
available are reports which list, for each of the 600 types of business, the chemicals which
contributed to the ranking for up to the 80 most important chemicals.
To focus inspection efforts more sharply on industries where high exposures are
found, OSHA has modified the HIP system by introducing an abbreviated list of 129
substances from OSHA inspections over the preceding five years with sampled exposures at
or above 50% of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) in at least 15% of the samples
taken across all industries. This list was then used instead of the National Occupational
Health Survey (NOHS) substance list in developing Weighted Industry Indices.
Reports can be obtained through the OSHA Office of Compliance Programming,
Washington, D.C., 20210.
3. OSHA Integrated Management Information Svstem (IMIS^.
This file contains data on OSHA inspections and citations, including results of
exposure monitoring during inspections. Most inspections in the system were initiated by
complaints, though the system also contains data from OSHA target inspection programs
(e.g. for foundries). Virtually all complaint-based OSHA inspections are performed in
states without their own state programs. Contact the OSHA Office of Policy, Legislation.
and Interagency Programs, Washington, D.C., Telephone: (202) 523-8021.
A-302
-------
California Department of Health Services (DOHS)
I. General Information
2. Health Effects of Toxic Substances
3. California Birth Defects Monitoring Program
4. California Tumor Registry
5. California Death Files
6. Occupational Mortality Project
7 Hazardous Waste Information System
California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA)
1. Pesticide Illnesses and Investigations
2. Pesticide Use Reports
California Health Facilities Commission (CHFC)
BJV Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
Local Agencies and Organizations
1. Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office
2. Santa Clara Center for Occupational Safety and Health (SCCOSH)
3. Local Sanitary Districts and Agencies
4. Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances
A-301
-------
APPENDIX 10
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH RESOURCES AND DATA SYSTEMS:
A DIRECTORY
This Directory describes data systems and information resources available from
agencies discussed in Section 2, and lists agency telephone numbers and addresses. The
Directory contains entries for these agencies and data sources:
OSHA
1. The OSHA Computerized Information System (OCIS)
2. OSHA Health Inspection Plan (HIP)
3. OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS)
4. OSHA Documents
5. Standards
NIOSH
1. Documents and Reports
2. Hazard Surveys
3. Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) File
4. RTECS
5. NOHS-RTECS model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational
Groups.
ŁŁA
1. Publications
2. Chemical Substances Information Network
3. Chemical Data
4. Manufacturing Data
CAL/OSHA
1. Toxic Substances and Health Effects Data
2. Enforcement and Compliance Data
3. Scheduled Health Inspection List (SHI)
4. Carcinogen Registration List
5. Consultation Service
6. Standards, Pamphlets, and other CAL/OSHA Literature
California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR)
1. Occupational Injuries and Illness Survey, California
2. California Work Injuries and Illnesses
3. Occupational Disease in California
A-300
-------
APPENDIX 11
A Key to
Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) Codes
This Appendix gives standardized short titles for all
SIC codes in the Standard Industrial Classification
Manual, j.972, U.S. Office of Management and Budget.
"NEC" denotes "not elsewhere classified".
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
A. AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND FISHING
01
Oil
0111
0112
011S
011S
0119
013
0131
0132
0133
0131
0139
016
0161
01?
0171
0172
0173
0174
017S
0179
01S
0181
01 S3
0189
019
0191
0:
02!
0211
0212
0213
0214
0219
024
0211
025
0251
0211
01T.3
OiiJ
02^9
027
0271
Ihtrt Tllll
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION-
CHOPS
Cash Grain*
Wbeat
Rln
Corn
Soybean*
CuMb grain*. nee
Field Crop*, Eicept Cuh Grain*
Cotton
Tobacco
Sugar crops
I rub potato**
Field crop*, except nib grain*. nee
Vegetable* and Melon*
Vendible* and melon*
Fruit* and Tree Nut*
Merry crops
Orape*
Tree nut*
Citrus frulU
Deciduous tree fruit*
Fruit* and tre*nuu,nec
Horticultural Specialtiea
Ornamental nursery product*
Food crop* grown under cover
Horticultural wpcclaltlei, nee
General Parma, Primarily Crop
General farms, primarily crop
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION-
LIVESTOCK
Liventorl'. t\e. Dairy, Poultry, etc.
De«f cattle feed lots
Dccf cattle, except feed lot*
Dogi
Sbecp and goat*
General livestock, nee
Dairy Farma
Dairy fnrm*
Poultry and Egg*
DroiiiT. fryer, und roaster chickens
ChkUcn egg*
Turlii'jrs ami turkey egg s
Poultry liatclitrlcs
Poultry And i-tfk's. nee
Aninul Specialties
>'ur bviirliii; unliual* and rabbits
0272
0279
029
0291
07
071
0711
072
0721
0722
0723
0724
0729
074
0741
0742
07S
07S1
0752
076
0761
0762
078
0781
0782
078."
08
031
OS11
032
0321
Oil
1)313
03)9
03i
OS51
09
(Wl
0'.M2
0'.H3
0:M9
0'J2
0021
U'jT
U'Jll
Ikirl
Bones and other equloea
Animal *i».-clulile«, oec
General Farm*, Primarily LIv«atock
General farms, primarily llTcttock
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES
Soil Preparation Service*
Soil preparation Mrrlcei
Crop Service*
Crop planting and protection
Crop liarvc»tlog
Crop preparation lervtce* for market
Cottoa ginning
General crop «ervices
Veterinary Servicea
Veterinary tcrriccs, farm llveitoek
Veterinary icrvicci, ipeelalUt*
Animal Servicea, Except Veterinary
Livestock icrvicei, exc. tpeelaltle*
Animal ipcclalty acrrlces
Farm Labor and Management Service*
Kurm labor contractor*
Fnrm management lervlces
L*ndtc*pe and Horticultural Service*
Lflodscnpe counseling and planning
Lnnrn and garden service*
Ornamental sbrub and tree *ervlce*
FORESTRY
Timber Tract*
^Timber tract*
Forest Nurierie* and Se*d Catherine
Forest nurseries and cecd gatberlfig
Gathering of Misc. Forest Pro-duett
Extraction of plue gum
Catbcrlog of forest product*, we
Forestry Services
Forestry services
FISHING. HUNTING, AND TRAPPING
Commercial Fishing
Misi-diiineous marine product*
Fiili ll«tflii-riti snd Pre*erve*
Kivli linu-licrlcs flml prcicrrcs
HiHilmi;. Trsjipinv:, Came Propagation
lliiulln^. iru|.|ilnk-. fnutv
A-322
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
B. MINING
Cod* Bllort Tillt
10 METAL MINING
101 Iron Orel
1011 Iron ore*
102 Copper Ore*
1021 Copper ores
103 Lead and Zinc Ore*
1031 .Lead tod zinc ore*
104 Gold and Silver Ore*
1041 Gold ore*
1044 Silver ore*
IDS B«axite and Other Aluminum Ores
1051 Banxit* and other aluminum ores
106 Ferroalloy Ores, Except Vanadium
1061 Ferroalloy orei, except vanadium
108 Metal Mininf Service*
1081 Metal mining wrrlcet
109 Miscellaneous Metal Ore*
1092 Mercury ore*
1094 .Uranium-radlum-vanadlTim orei
1099 Metal ore*, nee
11 ANTHRACITE MINING
111 Anthracite Mining
1111 Anthracite
1112 Anthracite mining service*
u BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE
MINING
121 Biturainooi Coal and Lignite. Mining
1211 Bltumlnou* coal and lignite
1213 Bltumlnou* 4 lignite mining service*
13 OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION
131 Crude Petroleum and Natural Gaa
1311 Crude petroleum and natural ga*
132 Natural Gaa Liquida
Catf*
U
1S2
1521
1522
153
1531
154
1541
1542
Cod*
1321
138
1381
1382
1389
14
gkort TUtt
Natural tni liquid*
Oil and Gis F' MiscelUneou* Nonmetallie Mineral*
1492 Gypsum
1496 Talc, voapstone, and pyrophylUte
1499 Nonmetalllc mineral*, nee
C. CONSTRUCTION
a\»n Tint
GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS
Residential Building Construction
Single-family housing construction
Residential construction, nee
Operative Builders
Operative nullilera
Nonreaidential Building Construction
Industrial l»ill
-------
LIST OK SHOUT SIC TITLES
Cmlc Sktn Title
17 SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS
171 Plumbing, Heating. Air Conditioning
1711 riiiinliliiK. IK-HI Inc. nlr conditioning
172 Painting. Paper Hanging, Decorating
1721 I'ulntliiK. i«M*r bangine, decorutiug
173 Electrical Work
1731 Klectricnl work
174 Maaonry, Stonework, and Plaalering
1741 Mnvoiiry and other stonework
1742 nattering, drywall and Insulation
1743 Tcrrazzo, tile, marble, mosaic work
17S Carpentering and Flooring
1751 Carpentering
I't'le Iktrt Title
1752 Floor laying anil di>or work, nee
176 Roofing and Shttt Metal Work
1761 Idivliiit; mill sbi-vl luvinl work
177 Concrete Work
1771 CoiuTfU- work
178 Water Well Drilling
1781 \VJIIT wvli drilling
179 MUe. Special Trade Contractor*
1791 Strncturnl »teel erection
1793 Uluva anil glazing work
1794 Excnvnting and foundation work
1795 Wrecking nnd demolition work
179C Installing balldioe equipment. Bee
1799 Special trnJe coo tractor*, nee
D. MANUFACTURING
Cult lltort Till!
20 FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS
201 Meat Producta
2011 ileut nncklnc plant*
2013 Snusoge* anil other prepared meata
2016 Poultry dresaing planta
2017 Poultry and egg processing
202 Dairy Products
2021 Crenmery butter
2022 Cheese, natural and processed
2023 Condensed and evairaratcd milk
2024 lev cream and frozen desserts
2026 Fluid milk
203 Preserved Fruits and Vegetables
2032 Canned specialties
2033 Canned fruits and rentable*
2034 Dehydrated fruiu, vegetables, soups
2035 I'lcklev, Nnuce*, and wiluil ilreiwInB*
2037 Krosen^rult* and vegetable*
2038 Frozen i|*ciulties
204 Grain Mill Producta
2041 Flour and oilier grain mill product*
2043 Cereal breakfast foods
2044 Rice milling
2045 DlendcO and pretnred dour
2046 Wet corn milling
2047 Dog, cat, and other i«t food
2048 l'r?|iartd feeds, nee
205 Bakery Product*
2051 Dreud, cuke, and related products
2052 Cookies and crackers
206 Sugar and Confectionery Producta
2061 HAW nine incur
2062 Cane nugar refining
2063
2065
2066
2067
207
2074
2075
2076
2077
2079
208
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
209
2091
2092
2095
2097
2098
2099
21
211
2111
212
2121
213
2131
214
2141
tktrt rule
Deet nuear
Confectionery product*
Chocolate and cocoa products
Chetvlnc cum
Fata and Oils
fottonMwil oil mills
Moyi*un oil mills
\>eetaljlr °il Dill*, nee
Animal nnd marine fat* and oils
aiiarti'iiliig and cooking oils
Beverages
Malt beverages
Malt
Wine*, brandy, and brandy spirits
OtmllliMl liquor, rzcvpt brandy
llottkil uiiil canned soft drink*
Flavoring i-xtract* and sirup*, nee
Miac. Food* and Kindred Producta
Canned and cured seafood*
Fresb or frozen packaged fl*n
Roasted coffee
Munufiictured Ice
Mncuronl and iiughettl
Food prc|*rutlou», nee
TOBACCO MANUFACTURES
Cigarette*
Cigara
Clenn«
Chrwing and Smoking Tobacco
Clirwlnc nnd iniuklng tobuccu
Tobacco Stemming and Kedrying
Tobacco *teuiuiue and rtilrying
A-324
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Ceil «»«rr rill*
22 TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS
22} Waiving Mills, Cotton
2211 Wearing mills, cotton
222 Wearing Mill*, Synthetic*
2221 Wearing mills, synthetics
223 Wearing ind Finishing Mills, Wool
2231 Wetvmg and finishing mills, wool
224 Narrow Fabric Milli
2241 Niu-row fabric mill*
225 Knitting mill*
2251 Women's hosiery, except sock*
2252 Hosiery, nee
2253 Knit outerwear mills
2254 Knit underwear mills
2257 Circular knit fabric mills
2258 Warp knit fabric mills
2259 Knitting mlllj, nee
226 Teitile Finishing. Except Wool
2261 Finishing plants, cottou
2262 Finishing plsnts, synthetics
2269 Finishing plants, nee
227 Floor CoTtring Mills
2271 WoTen carpets and rugs
2272 Tufted can*ts snd rugs
2279 Carpets and ruga, nee
228 Yarn and Thread Mills
2281 Tarn mills, except wool
2282 Throwing and winding mills
2283 Wool yarn mills
2284 Thread mills
229 Miscellaneous Textile Goods
2291 Felt goods, exc. woven felts & bats
2292 Lace goods
2293 Paddings and upholstery filling
2294 Processed textile waste
2295 Coated fabrics, not rubberised
2296 Tire cord snd fabric
2297 Nonworen fabric*
2298 Cordage and twine
2299 Textile goods, nee
23 APPAREL AND OTHER TEXTILE
PRODUCTS
231 Men's and Boys' Suits and Coats
2311 Men's snd DOTH' suits and coats
232 Men's and Boys' Furnishings
2321 Men's snd boys' shirts and nlgbtwear
2322 Men's and boys' underwear
2323 Men's and boya' neckwear
2327 Men's and boys' separate trousers
2328 Men's snd boys' work clothing
2329 Men's and boys' clothing, nee
Ctdf •»«!•« TUli
233 Women's snd Misses' Outerwear
2331 Women's & misses' blouses 4 waists
2335 Women's and nilsucs' dresses
2337 Women's and misses' suits and coats
2339 Women's snd misses' outerwear, nee
234 Women's snd Children's Undergarments
2341 Woiuen'« uuU i'iiU.'va 4 ..uderwear
2342 Brunsleres and silled garments
235 Hats, Caps, and Millinery
351 Millinery
2352 Hutu and caps, except millinery
236 Children's Outerwear
2361 Children's dresses and blouses
2363 Children'* coats snd suits
2369 Children's outerwear, nee
237 Fur Good*
2371 Fur goods
238 Miscellaneous Apparel and Accessories
2381 Fabric drew and work glOTcs
2384 Robes snd dressing gowns
2385 Waterproof outergarments
2386 Leather and sbeep lined clothing
2387 Apparel belts
2389 Appa-rel and accessories, nee
239 Misc. Fabricated Textile Products
2391 Curtains and draperies
2392 House furnishings, nee
2393 Textile bigs
2394 Canvas and related product!
2395 Pleating and stitching
2396 Automotlre and apparel trimming*
2397 Schlffli machine embroideries
2399 Fabricated textile products, nee
24 LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS
241 Logging Camps ft Logging Contractors
2411 Logging camps * logging contractors
242 Sawmills and Planing Mill*
2421 Sawmills and planing mills, general
2426 Hardwood dimension and flooring
2429 Special product sawmills, nee
243 Millwork, Plywood * Structnral Mem-
ber*
2431 Millwork
2434 Wood kitchen cabinet*
2435 Hardwood veneer and plywood
2436 Softwood veneer and plywood
2439 Structural wood members, nee
244 Wood Container*
2441 Nailed wood Uoxes snd shook
2448 Wood imllets and skid*
2449 Wood containers, nee
A-325
-------
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
Ctlt
245 Wood Buildings and Mobile Hornet
2451 Mobile liuuien
2452 1'rcfttbricated wood buildings
249 Miscellaneous Wood Product!
2491 Wood preserving
2492 Pnrtlcleboard
2499 Wood product*, nee
25 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
251 Household Furniture
2511 Wood household furniture
2512 Upholstered household furniture
2514 Metal household furniture
2515 Mattresses sod bedsprlnc*
2517 Wood TV snd rmdlo ctbineu
2519 Household furniture, nee
252 Office Furniture
2521 Wood office furniture
2522 MvU4 office furniture
253 Public Buildinc * Related Fomltore
2531 Public building 4 related furniture
254 Psrtitions and Fixtures
2541 Wood ittrtUloiu sod fixture*
2542 Metal imnitioos sod fixtures
259 Miscellsneous Furniture and Fixtures
2591 Draiwry hardware 4 blinds 4 shades
2599 furniture snd fixtures, nee
28 PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS
261 Pulp Mills
2(11 Pulp mills
262 Paper Mills, Except Buildinc Paper
2621 Pu|«r mills, except building p«per
263 Psperboard Mills
2631 Paiwrbourd mills
264 Misc. Converted Psper Products
2641 Psper eoatinf and glailog
2642 Envelopes
2643 Bap, except textile ban
2645 Die-cut paper and board
2646 Pressed and molded pulp Roods
2647 Sanitary paper products
2648 StMtlooery products
2649 Converted paper products, nee
265 Paperboard Containers and Boxes
2651 Folding paperboard boxes
2652 S*l-up |iur«rbourd boxes
2653 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes
2654 Sanitary focx! container*
2655 Fiber Minx, drums 4 sluillor products
266 Building Psper snd Bosrd Mills
2661 Building puiwr und board mills
Cut* flkcrf Tun
V PRINTING AND PUBLISHING
271 Newspapers
2711 NewMpuivrs
272 Periodicals
2721 Periodicals
273 Books
2731 Book publishing
2732 Book printing
274 Miscellaneous Publishing
2741 Miscellaneous publUUlng
275 Commercial Printing
2751 Commercial printing, letterpress
2752 Commercial printing, lithographic
2753 EogravJnc and plate printing
2754 Commercial printing, grsrure
276 Manifold Business Forma
2761 Manifold business forms
277 Greetinx Card Publishing
2771 Greeting curd publishing
278 Blankbooks and Bookbinding
2782 Blankbooks and loowlnf binders
2789 Bookbinding snd related work
279 Printing Trade Services
2791 Typesetting
2793 PhotoenicruvlDC
2794 Electrotypiug and stcreotyplog
2795 LltliognpLic platemaklog services
28 CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PROD-
UCTS
281 Industrial Inorganic Chemicals
2812 Alkalies sod chlorine
2813 Industrial gases
2816 loorgaolc pigments
2819 Industrial laorgsolc chemicals, nee
282 Plastics Materials and Synthetics
U21 Plsstlcs materials and resins
2822 Synthetic rubber
2823 Ollulotlc msn-made fibers
2824 Organic fibers, ooncellnloslc
283 Drugs
2831 Biological products
2833 Medlcloals sod botanicals
2834 Pharmaceutical preparations
284 Soap, Cleaners, snd Toilet Goods
2841 Sosp snd other detergents
2842 Polishes snd sriMiaiiou goods
2843 Surface active agents
2844 Toilet preparations
2A5 Paints and Allied Products
2851 Paints and allied products
286 Industrial Orgsnic Chemicals
A-326
-------
STANDAHD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Cade iAorf Title
2861 Gum and wood chemical*
2845 Cyi'lif crmlt". uml IntiTiiicdintes
21169 Industrial organic clifuiicalit. nee
287 Agricultural ChcmiciU
2873 Nitrogenous fertilizers
2874 Phospliatic fertilizers
2873 FertiliziTi, njiiiuc only
2879 Agricultural chemicals, nee
289 Miscellaneous Chemical Products
2891 Aducsives aod sealants
2892 Explosive*
2893 Printing Ink
2895 Carbon black
.2899 Chemical prepara. 3ns, nee
29 PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS
291 Pttroleura Refining
2911 Petroleum refining
295 Paving and Roofing Material!
2951 Paving mixtures aod blocks
2952 Asphalt fells aod coatings
299 Misc. Petroleum and Coal Products
2992 Lubricating oils and greaaes
2999 Petroleum and coal products, nee
30 RUBBER AND MISC PLASTICS
PRODUCTS
301 Tires and Inner Tube*
3011 Tires and loner tubes
302 Rubber and Plastics Footwear
3021 Rubber and plastics footwear
303 Reclaimed Rubber
3031 Reclaimed rubber
304 Rubber and Plastic* How and Belting
3041 Rubber aod plastics hose aod belting
306 Fabricated Rubber Products, nee
3069 Fabricated rubber products, nee
307 Miscellaneous Plaatics Products
3079 Miscellaneous plastic* products
31 LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS
311 Leather Tanning and Finishing
3111 Leather tanning and finishing
313 Boot and Shot Cut Stock and Findings
3131 Boot and shoe cut stock aod flndlogs
314 Footwear, Except Rubber
3142 House slippers
3143 Men's footwear, except athletic
3144 Women's footwear, except athletic
3149 Footwear, except rubber, nee
315 Leather Gloves and Mittens
3151 Leather gloves and mittens
Coil*
316
3161
317
3171
3172
319
3199
32
321
3211
322
3221
3229
323
3231
324
3241
325
3251
3253
3255
3259
326
3261
3262
3263
3264
3269
327
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
328
3281
329
3291
3292
3293
3295
3296
3297
3299
Short Title
Luggage
Handbags and Personal Leather Goods
Women'* liniidungs und purses
Personal loailier goods, ncc
Leather Goods, nee
Leather goods, oec
STONE, CLAY, AND GLASS PROD-
UCTS
Flat Glass
Flat glaas
Glass snd Glassware, Pressed or Blown
Gloss containers
Pressed aod blown glass, oec
Products of Purchased Glass
Products of purchased glass
Cement, Hydraulic
Cement, hydraulic
Structural Clay Products
Brick aod structural clay tile
CVramic wall aod floor tile
Clay refractories
Structural clay products, nee
Pottery snd Related Products
Vitreous plumbing fixtures
Vitreous china food utensils
Floe earthenware food utensils
Porcelain electrical supplies
Pottery products, nee
Concrete, Gypsum, snd Plaster Products
Concrete block aod brick
Concrete products, oec
Ready-mixed concrete
Lime
Gypsum products
Cut Stons and Stone Products
Cut stone and stone products
Misc. Nonmetallie Mineral Products
Abrasive product*
Asbestos products
Gnskcts, packing and sealing devices
Minerals, ground or treated
Mineral wool
Nonclny refractories
Noninetnlllc mineral products, nee
33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES
331 Blast Furnace and Basic Steel Products
3312 nijst furnnccv and steel mills
3313 Eli-ctrometnllurgical products
1315 Steel wire and related product*
A-321
-------
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
Cude Hkort Tide
3316 ColU finishing of »t««l shapes
3317 Steel pl|* and tubes
332 Iron tod Steel Foundries
3321 Gray Iron foundries
3322 Malleable Iron foundries
3324 Steel Investment foundries
3325 Steel foundries, nee
333 Primary Non/errous MeUU
3331 Primary copper
3332 Primary lead
3333 Primary zinc
3334 Primary aluminum
3339 Primary nonferrour metals, nee
334 Secondary Nonferroua Metals
3341 Secondary uonferrouv metals
333 Nonferroui Roll in r and Drawing
3351 Copper rolling and drawlnc
3353 Aluminum sheet, plate, and foil
3354 Aluminum extruded products
3355 Aluminum rollloc and drawing, nee
3356 N'onf«rrou» rolling and drawing, nee
3357 Nonferroui wire drawing 4 Insulating
336 Nonferroua Foundries
3361 Aluminum foundries
3362 Brass, bronze, and copper foundries
3369 Nonferrous foundries, nee
339 Miscellaneous Primary Metal Products
3398 Metal h«at treating
3399 Primary metal products, nee
34 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS
341 Metal Cans and Shipping Containers
3411 Metal cans
3412 Metal barrels, dniton, and palls
342 Cutlery. Hand Tools, and Hardware
3421 Cutlery
3423 Hand and edge tools, nee
3425 Hand saws and saw blades
3429 Hardware, nee
343 Plumbing and Heating. Except Electric
3431 Mrtnl (unitary ware
3432 Pluinblnc fittings and brass goods
3433 Heating equipment, except electric
344 Fabricated Structural Metal Product*
3441 F.ibrU-ntnl vtructurnl metal
3442 Mi-tnl door*. sflRli, and trim
3443 Fubrlcutetl plate work (boiler abops)
3444 Slu-el metal work
3416 Architectural metnl work
3448 PrefiibrlcnteO metal bnlldlngs
3449 Miscellaneous metal work
Cuil* Hhorl Tltlt
345 Screw Machine Product*, BolU, tie.
3451 Screw maclnne products
3452 Dolts, nuts, rivets, and waibers
346 Metal Forgings and Stampings
3462 Iron and steel forcings
3463 Nonfcrrous forglngs
3465 Automotive stamping*
3466 Crowns and closures
3169 Metal ' i'9i'.<:;i. n«c
347 Metal Services, nee
3471 Plating and polishing
3473 Metal costing and allied services
348 Ordnance and Accessories, nee
3482 Small srmi ammunition
3483 Ammunition, exc. for small arms, nee
3484 SmslI arms
3489 Ordnsoee and accessories, nee
349 Misc. Fabricated Met*! Products
3493 Steel springs, except wire
3494 Valres and pipe flttlngt
3495 Wire spring*
3496 Misc. fabricated wire products
3497 Metal foil and leaf
3498 Fabricated i>!|>e and fittings
3499 Fabricated metal products, nee
35 MACHINERY. EXCEPT ELECTRICAL
351 Engines and Turbines
3511 Turbines and turbine generator sets
3519 Internal combustion engines, nee
352 Farm and Garden Machinery
3523 Form machinery and equipment
3524 Lawn snd garden equipment
353 Construction and Related Machinery
3531 Construction machinery
3532 Mining macblnery
3533 Oil field machinery
3534 Elevators and moving stairways
3535 Conveyors and conveying equipment
3536 Hoists, crones, snd monorails
3537 Industrial trucks and tractors
354 Mctalworking Machinery
3541 MiirUuu» tooU. metal cutting types
3542 Machine tool*, metal forming types
3544 Siwclol ilies. tools, jig* 4 fixtures
3545 Machine tool accessories
3546 Powrr driven band tools
3547 Rolling mil! machinery
3549 Mvt.ilworklne machinery, nee
355 Special Industry Machinery
3551 Food product* macbiuery
A-326
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Otdt f»on
3552 Textile machinery
3553 Woodworking machinery
3554 Psi*r industries machinery
3555 Printing trades machinery
3559 Special Industry machinery, nee
356 General Industrial Machinery
3561 Pumps nnrt piimplpjeoviiiTient
1562 Ba ll a nd roller bea rings
3563 Air and gas compressors
3564 Blower* and fana
3565 Industrial patterna
3566 Speed changers, drlrea, and gear*
3567 Industrial furnaces and ovens
3568 Power tn isuilislon equipment, nee
3569 General Industrial machinery, uec
357 Office and Computing Machine*
3572 Typewrite™
3573 Electronic computing equipment
3574 Calculating and accounting machines
3576 Scales and balances, ezc. laboratory
3579 Office machines, nee
358 Refrigeration and Scrrice Machinery
3581 Automatic merchandising machines
3582 Commercial laundry equipment
3585 Refrigeration and heating equipment
3586 Measuring and dispensing pumps
3589 Serrlce Industry machinery, nee
359 Mis*. Machinery. Except Electrical
3392 Carburetors, pistons, rings, valves
3599 Machinery, except electrical, nee
36 ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
MI Electric Distributing Equipment
3612 Transformers
3613 Swltcbgear and switchboard apparatus
362 Electrical Industrial Apparatus
3621 Motors and generator*
3622 Industrial controls
3623 Welding apparatus, electric
3624 Carbon and graphite products
3629 Electrical industrial apparatus, nee
363 Household Appliancea
3631 Household cooking equipment
3632 Household refrigerators and freesera
3633 Household laundry equipment
3634 Electric house-wares and fans
3635 Houaehold vacuum cleanem
3636 Sewing machines
3639 Household appliances, nee
Corf. Iktrl TUU
364 Electric Lighting and Wiring Equipment
3641 Elevtrlc lamps
3643 Curreut-carrytng wiring dCTlces
3644 Nonciirrentarts and accessories
3715 Truck trailers
S72 Aircraft and Parts
3721 Aircraft
3724 Aircraft engines and engine parts
3728 Aircraft equipment, nee
373 Ship and Boat Building and Repairing
3731 Ship building and retiring
3732 Bout luiildlni; and repairing
374 Railroad Equipment
3743 Railroad equipment
375 Motorcycle*. Bicycle*, and Parts
3751 Motorcycles, bicycles, and part*
376 Guided Missiles. Space Vehicles, Psrts
3761 Guided missiles and space vehicle*
A-329
-------
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
Cerft Iftert TUlt
3764 Space proiiuUlon units end i«rt»
3769 Space vvlik-lr w)iil|>au-iil, nee
379 Miscellaneous Transportation Equip-
ment
3792 Travel trailer* and caa|*r*
3795 Tunkj toil Unk components
3799 Transportation equipment, ntc.
31 INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED
PRODUCTS
Ul Engineering A Scientific Initrumtnti
3811 Engineering A scientific Instruments
382 Measuring and Controlling Device*
3822 Environmental control*
3823 Proces* control Instrument*
3824 Fluid meters snd count In e device*
382S Instrument! to messure electricity
3829 Measuring A cootrolllnc devices, oec
383 Opticsl Instruments and Lenses
3832 Opticsl Instruments and lenses
384 MediesJ Instruments and Supplies
3841 Surgical sod medical Instruments
3842 Surgical appllsnces and supplies
3843 Dental equipment and supplies
385 Ophthalmic Goods
3851 Ophthalmic foods
386 Photographic Equipment and Supplies
3861 Photographic equipment anil supplies
387 Wstches, Clocks, and Wsteheases
3873 Watches, clocks, and watchcases
C»«« tk«rt fill*
39 MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING
INDUSTHIES
391 Jewelry. Silverware, sad PlaUd War*
3911 Jewelry, precious metal
3914 Silverware and plated ware
3915 Jewt-len' materials & lapidary work
393 Mu*ic»l Instruments
3931 Musical Instruments
394 Toys sad Sportinf Goods
3942 Dolls
3944 Games, toys, and children's vehicle*
3949 Sporting snU athletic foods, nee
395 Pens, Pencils. Office and Art Supplies
3951 Pens snd mecbsnlcal pencils
3952 Lesd pencils snd an foods
3953 Xlsrklnf devices
3955 Carbon paper and Inked ribbons
396 Costume Jewelry and Notions
S96I Costume jewelry
J962 Artificial flowers
3963 Buttons
3964 Needles, pins, snd fasteners
399 Miscellaneous Msnufacturss
3991 Broom* and brushes
3993 Slcas snd sdvertlslnf displays
3995 Burlsl caskets
3996 Bird surface floor coverinn
3999 Manufactures Industries, nee
E. TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES
C*tf( f»»r» THIl
40 RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION
401 Railroads
4011 Railroads, line-haul operatlnf
4013 Swltchlnf and terminal services
404 Railway Express Service
4041 Railway express *ervU«
41 LOCAL AND INTERURBAN PAS-
SENGER TRANSIT
411 Local and Suburban Transportation
4111 Local and suburban transit
4119 Local passenger transportation, nee
412 Tszicabs
4121 To lien Us
413 Intercity Hifhwsy Transportation
4131 Intercity hlcliwsy transportation
414 Transportation Charter Service
4141 Local jiaascncer chnrter si-rrlce
4142 Charter service, except local
*»»n rui*
415 School Buses
4151 School buses
417 Bus Terminal snd Service Facilities
4171 Bus terminal facilities
4172 Bus service facilities
42 TRUCKING AND WAREHOUSING
421 Trucking. Local and Lone DisUnce
4212 Local trucking, without storsfe
4213 Trucklnc, except local
4214 Loco I trucking and storage
422 Public Warrhouainf
4221 Kami product wnrebouslnf snd storage
4222 RpfrigiTaied wareLouiinj
4224 lloutoliold foods warebouslnf
4225 Genprnl wnroliomltig and storsfv
4226 SixK-inl warelioimne and stormf*. Dec
423 Trucking Terminal Facilities
4231 Truckmf terminal facilities -
A- 3 3 0
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Cod« Skort Title
43 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
431 U.S. PosUl Service
4311 U.S. Postal Serricc
44 WATER TRANSPORTATION
441 Deep Sea Foreign Transportation
4411 Deep sea foreign tranuportation
442 Deep Sea Domestic Transportation
4421 Noncontiguous area transportation
4422 Coastwise transportation
4423 Intercoastal transportation
443 Grtat Lake* Traniporution
4431 Great Lakes transportation
444 Transportation on Hirers and Caoala
4441 Transportation on riven and canal*
44S Local Water Transportation
4452 Ferries
4453 Lighterage
4454 Totting and tugboat service
4459 I-oca I water transportation, nee
446 Water Transportation Services
4463 Marine cargo handling
4464 Canal operation
4469 Water transportation services, nee
45 TRANSPORTATION BY AIR
451 Certificated Air Transportation
4511 Certificated air transportation
452 Noncertificated Air Transportation
4521 Noncertlflcflted air trnnsi>ortatioii
458 Air Tranaportation Services
4582 Airports and flying fields
4583 Airport terminal services
46 PIPE LINES. EXCEPT NATURAL GAS
461 Pipe Lines. Except Natural Gaa
4612 Crude petroleum pipe lines
4613 Refined petroleum pip* lines
4619 Pipe lines, nee
47 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
471 Freight Forwarding
4712 Freight forwarding
472 Arrangement of Tranaportation
Coil* Short Tiff*
4722 Passenger transportation arrangement
4723 Freleht transportation arrangement
474 Rental of Railroad Can
4742 Railroad car rental with service
4743 Ruilro.t
-------
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
F. WHOLESALE TRADE
I'eif* *A«n rill*
50 WHOLESALE TRADE—DURABLE
COUDS
SOI Motor Vehicles & Automotive Equipment
5012 Automobile* and ollirr motor vehicles
5013 Automotive jiorta a Del luppllcs
5014 Tires and tubes
502 Furniture and Home Furnishings
5021 Furniture
5023 Home furnishings
503 Lumber snd Construction Materials
5031 Lumber, plywood sod mlllwork
5039 Construction materials, nee
504 Sporting Goods, Tors, and Hobby Goods
5041 Sportlns and recreational goody
5042 Toyn and hobby good* and »uppllei
5043 Photographic equipment snd »u|>|>llei
505 Metals and Minerals. Eieept Petroleum
5051 Metuls service centers sod offices
5052 Coul nnd other minerals and ore*
506 Electrical Goods
5063 Electrical apparatus snd equipment
5064 Electrical appliances, TV and radios
5065 Electronic luirts und equipment
507 Hardware, Plumbing & Heating Equip-
ment
5072 Hardware
5074 Plumbing ft hydronlc heating supplies
5075 Warm sir lieatlne & air conditioning
5078 Refrigeration equipment unit inppllf*
508 Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies
5081 Commercial nuclimcn nnd rrtatlon equlpiufDt ft supplies
509 Miscellaneous Durable Goods
5093 Scrap and waste material*
5094 Jewelry, watches, * precious stooes
5099 Durable goods. Dec
Cull Hhort Till*
51 WHOLESALE TKADE— NONDURABLE
GOODS
Sll Psper and Paper Produeta
Sill 1'rlutinf and writing I«|H.T
S112 Stutlouery luppllri
5113 Indumriol ft persoosl service paper
512 Drugs, Proprietaries, snd Sundries
5122 I>ruc». proprietaries, soil xundrlen
513 Appsrel, Piece Goods, and Notions
5133 Piece goods
5131 Notions and other dry goodx
5136 Men'n clothing and furnishing*
5137 Women's sod children'* clothing
5139 Footwear
514 Groceries and Related Products
5141 Grocvrtei, general line
5142 Frou-n food*
5143 Duiry products
5144 Poultry aud poultry products
5145 Confectionery
5146 Flsu and seafoods
5147 Meats and meat products
5148 Fresh fruits sod vegetables
5149 Groceries and related product!, nee
SIS Farm-Product Raw Materials
5152 Cotton
5153 Grain
5154 Livestock
5159 Farm-product raw materials, nee
516 Chemicals and Allied Products
5161 Chemicals and silled products
S17 Petroleum snd Petroleum Products
5171 Petroleum bulk mstioos 4 terminals
5172 Petroleum products, nee
SIS B«er, Wine, and Distilled Beverage*
SU1 Beer and ale
S182 AVioes and distilled beverages
519 Miscellsneous Nondurable Goods
5191 Farm supplies
S194 Tobacco and tobacco products
S198 Paints, vurnlnhfi, and supplies
5199 Nondurable goods, nee
A-332
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
G. RETAIL TRADE
L"O<*« Sfcorf Title
52 BUILDING MATERIALS A GARDEN
SUPPLIES
521 Lumber and Other Buildinc Material!
5211 Lumber and ottier buildiug muteruiU
523 Paint, Glia-, >.iJ Wallpaper Statin
5231 Paint, glass, aad wallpaper store*
525 hardware Store*
5251 Hardware store*
526 Retail Nurseries and Garden Store*
5261 Retail nurseries and garden store*
527 Mobile Home Dealer*
5271 Mobile borne dealer*
S3 GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORES
531 Department Store*
5311 Department atore*
533 Variety Store*
5331 Variety etore*
5)9 Mite. General Merchandise Store*
5399 Misc. ceneral merchandise stores
54 FOOD STORES
541 Grocery Store*
5411 (Grocery store*
542 Meat Marketa and Freezer Provisioner*
5422 Preeter and locker meat proTlsloners
5423 Meat and flail (seafood) markets
543 Fruit Storea and Vegetable Marketa
5431 Fruit store* and vegetable markets
544 Candy. Nut, and Confectionery Store*
5441 Candy, nut. and confectionery stores
545 Dairy Products Store*
5451 Dairy products store*
546 Retail Bakeries
5462 Retail bakeries—baking and selling
5463 Retail bakeries—selling only
549 Miscellaneous Food Store*
5499 Miscellaneous food stores
55 AUTOMOTIVE DEALERS A SERVICE
STATIONS
551 New and Uaed Car Dealer*
5511 New and used car dealers
552 Used Car Dealer*
5521 Used car dealers
553 Auto and Horn* Supply Storea
5531 Auto and home supply stores
554 Gasoline Service Stations
5541 Gasoline service etatloo*
'Cut* attar I Till*
555 Boat Dealer*
5551 Boat dealers
556 Reerestion A Utility Trailer Dealera
5561 Kecrvulloii & utility trailer dealers
557 Motoreyrl* n»il.>ri
5571 Motorcycle dealers
559 Automotive Dealer*, nee
5599 Automotive dealers, nee
St APPAREL AND ACCESSORY STORES
561 Men's A Boys' Clothing A Furnishings
Mil Men's A boys' clothing It furnishings
562 Women's Ready-to-Wear Store*
5621 Women'* ready-to-wear stores
563 Women's Accessory and Specialty Store*
5631 Women's accessory and specialty stores
564 Children's and Infanta' Wear Stores
5641 Children's and infants' wear stores
565 Family Clothing Stores
5651 Family clothing stores
566 Shoe Stores
5661 Sboe stores
568 Furrier* and Fur Shop*
5681 Furriers and fur shops
569 Misccllsneous Apparel A Accessories
5699 Miscellaneous apparel & accesaories
57 FURNITURE AND HOME FURNISH-
INGS STORES
571 Furniture and Home Furnishings Store*
5712 Furniture stores
S713 Floor covering store*
5714 Drapery snd upholstery storea
5719 Misc. home furnishings store*
S72 Household Appliance Stores
5722 Household uppllance stores
S73 Radio, Television, and Music Store*
5732 Radio and television stores
5733 Music stores
SB EATING AND DRINKING PLACES
581 Eating and Drinking Places
5812 Eating places
5813 Drinking place*
59 MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL
591 Drug Store* and Proprietary Stores
5912 Drug stores and proprietary stores
A-333
-------
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
Cat* Ifcert Till*
592 Liquor Store*
5921 Liquor More*
593 Used Merchandise Store*
5931 UaeU merchandise score*
594 Miscellaneous Shopping Good* Store*
5941 Sporting good* and bicycle shop*
$942 Book store*
5943 Stationery Jtorea
5944 Jewelry More*
SMS Hobby, toy. and gams shop*
5946 Camera 4 photographic supply itores
S947 Gift, novelty, anil souvenir thop*
5948 Luggage and leather food* (tore*
S949 Sewing, needlework, and piece food*
C«rf« t**ri TUlt
596 Monitor* Retailer*
5961 Uail order house*
5962 .Mi-rrlmmliMiii; machine operator*
5963 Direct selling orcanlzatlona
59H Fuel and Ice Dealer*
5982 fuel and Ice dealers, Dec
5983 Fuel oil dealer*
5984 Lloueflnl (wtroleum fu» dealer*
599 Retail Store*, nee
5992 Fiorina
5993 Cigar (tore* and itaod*
5994 New* dealer* and newsatanda
5999 Miscellaneous retail (tore*, nee
H. FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE
Ctit faerf TUlt
M BANKING
MI Federal R««erre Bank*
Mil Federal Reaerre toanka
602 Commercial aad Stock Savinga Banka
M22 State banks, Federal Reserve
6023 State banks, not Fetl. Reserve, FDIC
6024 State hanks, not Fed R«-s., not FDIC
6025 National banlu. Federal Reserve
6026 Notional banks, not Fed. Res., FDIC
M27 National bank*, not FDIC
6028 Prirate bank*, not incorp., not FDIC
603 Mutual Savinga Bank*
6032 Mutual *nvlnt> banks. Federal Reserve
6033 Mutual so tine* bank*, nee
6034 Mutual aavlnc* banks, not FDIC
M4 Trust Companies, Nondepoiit
6042 Nondepoiit truit*. Federal Reaerre
6044 iNondepoalt trust*, not FDIC
605 Function* Closely Related to Banking
MS2 Foreign eicbaofe eatabllabment*
1054 Safe deposit companies
6055 Clearinghouse awioclatlona
6056 Corporal tons for banklne abroad
M59 Function* related to banking, nee
61 CREDIT AGENCIES OTHER THAN
BANKS
611 Rediscount and Financing Institutions
6112 Rediscounting, not for agricultural
611) Rediacountlng. for agricultural
612 Saving* and Loan Aiaoeiation*
6122 Knlerul .siivliicx & loon imoclatlons
6)23 State associations. Insured
6124 State associations, noninsured. FHLB
Ctdt lk»rt TUlt
6125 State associations, noninsured. nee
613 Agricultural Credit Institutions
6131 Agricultural credit Institution*
614 Personal Credit Institutions
6142 Federal credit unions
6143 State credit union*
6144 Nondeposlt Industrial loan companies
6145 Licensed small loan lenders
6146 Installment sales flat DC* companies
6149 Misc. personal credit Institutions
615 Business Credit Institutions
6153 Short-term business credit
6159 Misc. business credit institutions
616 Mortgage Rankers and Broken
6162 Mortgage bankers and correspondents
6163 .Loan broker*
62 SECURITY. COMMODITY BROKERS
A SERVICES
621 Security Broken and Dealer*
6311 Security broken and dealera
622 Commodity Contract* Broker*. Dealers
6221 Commodity contract* brokers, dealers
623 Security and Commodity Exchange*
6231 Security sod commodity exchanges
628 Security and Commodity Service*
6281 Security and commodity services
63 INSURANCE CARRIERS
631 Life Insurance
6311 Lift- Insurance
632 Medical Service and Health Insurance
6321 Arrlrivnt nnd henMh Insurance
6324 Ho»|>iUl aud medluil servlc« plan*
A-3 34
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Co,H
633
6331
635
6351
636
6361
637
6371
639
6399
(4
65
651
6612
6513
6514
6515
6517
6519
653
6531
CoJ.
70
701
7011
702
7021
703
7032
7033
704
7041
72
721
7211
7212
7213
7214
721S
7216
JAorl Title
Fire, Marine, and Casualty Insurant!
Kire. marine, and casually insurance
Surety Insurance
Surety Insurance
Title Insurance
Title Iniurance
Ptnaio.i, Htilth, and Welfare Funda
Pension, health, and welfare fuada
Inauranee Carriers, nee
Iniurance carriers, nee
INSURANCE AGENTS, BROKERS J
SERVICE
(41 Insurance Agents. Broken * Set-rice
6411 Insurance agenti, broken tt service
REAL ESTATE
Real Estate Operators and Lesaors
Nonmidenttal building operator*
Apartment building oiwratora
Dwelling operators, exc. apartments
Mobile home lite operators
Railroad property Iciiurs
Real property lessors, noe
Real Estate Afenta and Managers
Beat estate afents and managers
Corf* «»ort Title
654 Title Abstrsct Offices
6.1.11 Title iiliMriict uflirus
655 Subdividers and Developers
6552 Subillviilvrs and dereloiwrx, ncc
6553 Cemetery subdivlden and developers
66 COMBINED REAL ESTATE, INSUR-
ANCE, ETC
661 Combined Real Estate, Insurance, etc
6611 Combined real estate. Insurance, etc
67 HOLDING AND OTHER INVEST-
>IENT OFFICES
(71 Holdjng Offices
(711 Holding offices
672 Investment Offices
(722 Management Investment, open-end
(723 Management investment, closed-end
6724 Unit Investment trusts
(725 Face-amount certificate offices
673 Trusts
6732 Educational, religious, etc. trusts
6733 Trusts, nee
679 Miscellaneous Investing
6792 Oil royalty traden
6793 Commodity traders
6794 Patent owners and lessors
6799 Investors, nee
I. SERVICES
•»ort TWt
HOTELS AND OTHER LODGING
PLACES
Hotels, Motels, and Tourist Courts
Hoteli, motel*, and tourist courts
Rooming and Boarding Houses
Rooming and boarding houses
Camps and Trailering Parka
gnorting and recreational i-amps
Trailcring park* for transients
Membership-Basis Organization Hotels
Membership-basis organization hotels
PERSONAL SERVICES
Laundry, Cleaning, A Garment Service*
Power laundries, family & commercial
Garment pressing & cleaner*' agents
Linen supply
Diaper service
Coin-operated laundries and cleaning
Dry cleaning plants, eicept rug
C«f* ffttrt rm«
7217 Carpet ami upholstery cleaning
7218 Industrial laundcrers
7219 Laundry nnd inirment services, nee
722 Photographic Studios, Portrait
7221 Pliotngniphlc studios, portrait
723 Besuty Shops
7231 Beauty shop*
724 Barber Shops
7241 Onrbvr shops
725 Shoe Repair and Hat Geaning Shops
72S1 Shoe reimlr ond hat cleaning shops
726 Funeral Service and Crematories
72(1 Funeral service nnd crematories
729 Miscellaneous Personal Services
7299 Mlscvllancuun personal services
73 BUSINESS SERVICES
731 Advertising
7311 Advertising agenda*
7312 Outdoor advertising service*
A-335
-------
LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES
7313
7319
732
7321
733
7331
7332
7333
7339
734
7341
7342
7349
735
73S1
736
7361
7362
7369
737
7372
7374
7379
739
7391
7392
7393
7394
7395
7396
7397
7399
75
751
7512
7513
7519
752
7523
7525
753
7531
7534
7535
7538
7539
724
7542
7549
•»•« Til It
Radio. TV. publisher representatives
Ailvi-rtlslng. nee
Credit Reporting and Collection
Credit reporting une distribution for TV
7829 Motion picture distribution services
783 Motion Picture Theaters
7832 Motion picture (beaten, ex drive-In
7833 Drive-in motion picture tbeaten
79 AMUSEMENT * RECREATION SERV-
ICES
791 Dance Halls. Studios, and Schools
7911 Dance bnlls. »tudioi. snil schools
792 Producers, Orchestras, Entertainers
7922 Tliciitricol producers and services
7929 Entertainers & entertainment groups
793 Bowling and Billiard Establishments
7932 Billiard and pool establishments
7933 Bowling alleys
794 Commercial Sports
7941 Sports clubs and promoters
7948 Racing. Including track operation
799 Misc. Amusement, Recreational Services
7992 Public golf courses
7993 Coin-operated amusement devices
7996 Amuviiieot parks
7997 MemlHTshlp sports A recreation clubs
7999 Amusement and recreation, oer
80 HEALTH SERVICES
801 Offices of Physicians
8011 OtAces of physicians
802 Offices of Dentists
8021 Otnces of dentists
A-336
-------
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
Corf* *ft«rt Title
103 Office* of Oiteopathic Physicians
8031 OlflcvH of oKpnixithic i>l>y»icmc»
104 Offices of Other Health Practitioners
8041 Offices of chiropractors
8042 Office* of optometrists
8049 Offlce* of ben lib practitioners, nee
805 Nursing snd Personal Care Facilities
8051 Skilled nursing cm re facilities
8059 Nursing and personal esre, nee
806 Hospitals
SOU General medical * snrglcal hospitals
8063 Psychiatric hospitals
8069 Specially hospitals, ere. psychiatric
807 Medical and DenUl Laborstoriea
8071 Medical laboratories
8072 Dental laboratories
808 Outpatient Care Facilities
8081 Outpatient core facilities
809 Health and Allied Services, nee
8091 Health and allied serrlces, nee
81 LEGAL SERVICES
811 Lefal Services
8111 Legal serrlces
82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
821 Elementary snd Seeondsry Schools
8211 Elementary and secondary school*
822 Colleges sad Universities
8221 Colleges and universities, nee
8222 Junior colleges
823 Libraries and Information Centera
8231 Libraries and information centers
824 Correspondence and Vocational Schools
8241 Correspondence schools
8243 Dsta processing schools
8244 Business and secretarial schools
8249 Vocational schools, nee
829 Schools A Educational Services, nee
8299 Schools 4 educational services, nee
83 SOCIAL SERVICES
832 Individual and Family Services
8321 Individual and family services
S33 Job Training and Related Service*
Ctiti ftorf THI*
8331 Jnli training; and related services
835 Child Day Car* Services
83S1 Child day care services
836 Residential Care
8361 Residential care
839 Social Services, nee
6399 Socini services, nee
84 MUSEUMS. BOTANICAL. ZOOLOG-
ICAL GARDENS
841 Museums snd Art Galleries
8411 Museums and art galleries
842 Botanical and Zoological Gardena
8421 Botanical and soologlcal garden*
86 MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS
861 Business Associationa
8611 Business sssoclatlons
862 Professional Organizations
8621 Professional organizations
863 Labor Organizationa
8631 Labor organisations
864 Civic and Social Associations
8641 Civic snd social associations
865 Political Organizations
8651 Political organizations
866 Religious Orgsnizstions
8661 Religion* orpinlz.itIons
869 Membership Organizationa, nee
8699 Membership organizations, nee
88 PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS
881 Private Households
8811 Private households
89 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
891 Engineering & Architectural Services
8911 Engineering & architectural services
892 Noncommercial Research Organizations
8922 Noncommercial research oreanizatlons
893 Accounting, Auditing A Bookkeeping
8931 Accounting, auditing & bookkeeping
899 Services, nee
8999 Services, nee
A-337
------- |