United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Enforcement
Washington DC 20460
EPA 340/1-78-O09*
July 1978
Air Enforcement
Compilation and
Analysis of State
Regulations for SO2*
NOX, Opacity,
Continuous Monitoring,
and Applicable
Test Methods
Stationary Source
Enforcement Series
              Executive
              Summary

-------
       COMPILATION AND ANALYSIS OF

          STATE REGULATIONS FOR

SO,, NO , OPACITY, CONTINUOUS MONITORING,

       AND APPLICABLE TEST METHODS

            EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
       EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-01-4146

              TASK ORDER 40
              Presented to

  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Stationary Source Enforcement
           401 M Street, S. W.
         Washington, D. C. 20460

   EPA Project Officer: John R.  Busik
   EPA Task Manager:    Howard Wright
              Presented by

           Engineering-Science
           7903 Westpark Drive
          McLean, Virginia 22101
              June 2, 1978

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
                             LIST OF TABLES


TABLE 1      VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR "ALL
             EXISTING SOURCES", i.e.. NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE
             CATEGORY

TABLE 2      AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS
             FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES," i.e., NOT SOURCE
             SPECIFIC

TABLE 3      UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED SOg EMISSION STANDARDS

TABLE 4      UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO  EMISSION STANDARDS

TABLE 5      STATE/LOCAL AGENCY STATUS OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING
             IMPLEMENTATION FOR EXISTING SOURCES
                                           8

                                          10

                                          13


                                          15

-------
                       FOREWORD





     This research was performed for the Division of



Stationary Source Enforcement (DSSE), Environmental



Protection Agency under Task Order No. 40, EPA Contract



No. 68-01-4146.  Mr. Howard Wright, Compliance Monitoring



Branch, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement was



the EPA Task Manager.





     Because this document is a product of the efforts



of many individuals, it is impossible to acknowledge



each person who has contriouted.  however, special



recognition is 
-------
                      DISCLAIMER
     This report is issued by the Office of Enforcement,
Environmental Protection Agency. Copies are available
for a nominal cost from the National Technical Information
service, 52b5 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA.  22161.
The opinions expressed in this report are those of the
producing contractor and are not necessarily those of
the u.a. Environmental Protection Aoency.  This report
is not to be used as an all  inclusive reference document
for existing SIP regulations for selected sources and
pollutants.

-------
                            EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

     Current copies of the air pollution control regulations of all fifty
states, three territories, and twelve local agencies were reviewed for the
purpose of compiling information on a nationwide basis relevant to emission
standards, compliance test methods, and continuous emission monitoring, as
applied to existing stationary sources.  Specific pollutants of interest
were opacity, SO., NO , and sulfur compounds other than SO,.  For the
primary focus of this review and compilation, DSSE identified the following
existing source categories and associated pollutants for which details of the
applicable emission standards are of primary concern:
                                 OPACITY
               o  Fossil fuel-fired steam generators (FFFSG)
               o  Portland cement plants
               o  Catalyst regenerators of fluid bed catalytic cracking
                  units (FBCCU)
               o  Hog fuel-fired boilers
               o  Kraft recovery furnaces
               o  Basic oxygen process furnaces (BOPF)
               o  Ferroalloy electric submerged arc furnaces
               S02
NO
        o  FFFSG                    o  FFFSG
        o  Sulfuric acid            o  Nitric acid plants
           plants
        o  Smelters
     Most state and local agencies' regulations contain a provision restrict-
ing visible emissions for a generalised, non-specific grouping of sources
and equipment herein referred to as "all existing sources".  Inclusion of
such a broad-based opacity standard within an agency's regulations virtually
assures widespread, applicability of that visible emission limitation.
                                   -1-

-------
Sources not subject to a specific emission standard addressed especially to
a select source group are, nevertheless! usually governed by the all-en-
compassing standard for "all existing sources".  The state agencies of New
Hampshire and New Jersey together with the Boston >local agency were the only
agencies of those reviewed that did not have some form of generalized opacity
standard for "all existing sources".  For this nonspecific source grouping
the agencies are rather evenly divided between an opacity standard of 20%
and one of 40Z.  The District of Columbia enjoys the unique dlstiction of
being the only agency to prohibit visible emissions (i.e., 0% opacity) from
all existing stationary sources within its jurisdiction.  Maryland prohibits
visible emissions from existing sources in certain "Areas" of that state.
Seven of the agencies surveyed express their visible emissions limitation
for this wide-ranged category solely in units of the Ringelmann scale.  Table
1 summarizes the variation in the standards for visible emissions from "all
existing sources".
     Ten of the agencies reviewed provide for no exception to the opacity
standard for "all existing sources".  The remaining 52 agencies with  this
type of opacity standard allow some period during which the visible emissions
standard may be exceeded.  Generally, this exception period for intermittent
excursions ranges from 3-5 minutes  per hour.   In addition to providing for
emissions above the standard, some  of the agencies specify (1) how high
above the standard the emissions may extend as well as  (2) how long of a
period the emissions may remain above the standard each day.  Table 2
summarizes each state's opacity standard, allowable exception and permissible
periods above  the standard for the  generalized category of "all existing
sources",
     The situations concerning opacity standards for existing Fossil Fuel-
Fired Steam Generators (FFFSG) and for existing Hog Fuel-Fired Boilers are
very similar.  In both cases the agencies rarely use these specific termin-
ologies as the subject source caetgory for a visible emissions standard.
Florida is the only agency' for which there is a specific opacity standard
                                   -2-

-------
for existing FFFSG, and Washington has the only opacity standard addressed
specifically to Hog Fuel Boilers.  In both instances these kinds of
facilities are included within a more general grouping of sources for which
an opacity standard has been adopted by an agency.  Such source groupings as
"fuel burning equipment", "indirect heating equipment" and "combustion install-
ations" are the common denominators used by the agencies from which FFFSG and
Hog Fuel Boilers both comprise sub-sets.  Under these circumstances 13 states
and 3 locals have specific opacity standards capable of being directly trans-
lated to FFFSG.  Similarly, 12 states and 3 locals have opacity standards
directly applicable to Hog Fuel-Fired Boilers.  Section II elaborates on
the details of these specific agency regulations pertinent to the two source
groups.
     For the other five categories of existing stationary sources and associ-
ated opacity standards of interest to DSSE, the extent of visible emissions
standards is rather minimal.  Four states (Arizona, Georgia, Minnesota,
New York) currently have visible emissions standards applicable to existing
Portland Cement Plants.  Likewise, four states (Louisiana, Minnesota, New
Mexico, Washington) have opacity standards expressly for existing Catalyst
Regenerators at Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units (FBCCU).  Washington is
the only agency with a visible emissions standard prescribed for Kraft
Recovery Furnaces.  None of the state or local agency regulations contain
specific provisions for opacity standards for either existing Basic Oxygen
Process Furnaces (BOPF) or existing Ferroalloy Electric Submerged Arc
Furnaces.  The specifics on the few regulations pertinent to these source
categories are detailed in Section II.
     The most widespread means used by state and local agencies for specify-
ing S02 emission standards for existing FFFSG is either on the basis of
heat input, as pounds of S02 per million Btu, or in terms of restrictions on
the amount of sulfur contained in the fuel.  Of the 65 agencies reviewed,
36 agencies specify a lb/106 Btu standard and 28 agencies define the allow-
able fuel sulfur content.  S02 emission standards for existing FFFSG in terms
                                  -3-

-------
of concentration, ppm S02, or of mass emission rate, Ib SO^/hour, are used
to a much lesser extent.  Only the states of Arkansas, Maine and Rhode Island
are without some form of S02 emission limitation on existing FFFSG.
     SO2 emission standards for existing sulfuric acid plants are expressed
in terms of Ib S02 per ton of 100Z acid and ppm as S02.  The most prevalent
usage for standards directly applicable to this source category is the Ib/ton
expression.  The units of ppm are used in most cases of a generalized SO-
emission standard applicable to a variety of industrial processes including
sulfuric acid manufacturing.  Of the 46 agencies with an S02 emission standard
applicable to sulfuric acid plants, 25 of those standards are written expressly
for that group of affected facilities.
     Similar to the units used for sulfuric acid plant emission limitations,
emission standards for existing non-ferrous smelters are written in terms of
ppm as S02 and Ib SOj/hr.  In most cases the units of Ib S02/hr are used
when the standard applies specifically to smelters, while ppm is a more common-
place unit for standards restricting SO, from a variety of sources.  Of the
14 agency emission standards directly addressing smelters, 12 of those
standards are expressed in units of Ib S02/hr while only 2 are written in
terms of ppm SOj.  Table 3 is a tabular summary of agency 30^ emission
standards for the source categories of FFFSG, sulfuric acid plants and non-
ferrous smelters.
     Nitrogen oxides  (NO ) emission standards for existing FFFSG are usually
                        *     £
written in terms of Ibs NO/10  Btu.  All but one of the 16 state agencies
with this particular  emission standard have used that system of units.
Similarly, state emission standards for existing nitric acid plants are
usually expressed in  units of Ib NO  per ton of 100Z acid.  Although 2 states
have adopted standards in ppm NO  for existing nitric acid plants, 14 states
have adopted the Ib NO /ton expression as the emission standard for that
group of existing facilities.  Table 4 is a tabular summary of agency NO^
emission standards for the source categories of FFFSG and nitric acid plants.
                                    -4-

-------
Section II of this report contains more of the specific details pertinent to
the opacity, SO. and NO  emission standards for these source categories In
question.
     A rather commonplace provision of visible emission standards Is the
exception period whereby a source is permitted to intermittently exceed the
standard during brief periods of time.  Most agencies also have a general,
across-the-board provision which allows excess emissions during periods of
equipment malfunction and for control equipment maintenance.  Of the 65 agency
regulations reviewed, only 8 states and 3 locals were lacking some form of
regulation which specifically addresses malfunction and/or maintenance occur-
rences and their associated excess emissions.  The majority of these types
of provisions are neither specific to a given pollutant nor directed to a
given source group.
     Almost all of the agencies with malfunction/maintenance provisions
require agency notification of such occurrences.  Although the information
required for notification of a scheduled maintenance shutdown are somewhat
universal, the remaining details of malfunction/maintenance provisions
are extremely variable.  While some agencies require notification within
24 hours, others allow 10 days for notification of malfunctions.  Although
some agencies have provisions for follow-up reporting of remedial actions,
others do not even have a requirement for agency notification upon correction
of the incident and termination of the excess emissions.  None of the agencies
have enforcement provisions directing the affected source operations to be
immediately shutdown during malfunction or maintenance events, but a few
agencies do have explicit conditions that will allow the source to continue
operation either for only a brief time or for an indefinite period of time.
Section II of this report summarizes the variation in the agency regulations
dealing with malfunctions and scheduled maintenance.
     A survey of the extent to which individual state and local agencies
have complied with the requirement for provisions of continuous monitoring
                                   -5-

-------
regulations in accordance with 40 CFR 51 confirmed that the agencies' status
range from one extreme to the other.  Some agencies currently comply with
all facets of the Part 51 "Minimum Emission Monitoring Requirements" of
Appendix P, and in a*fev cases have more -comprehensive regulations than the
minimal requirements.  Conversely, some agencies have yet to adopt any of
the required Part 51 CM provisions.  As shown in Table 5, the agencies have
been ranked from Class I and IA to Class IV, depending upon the degree to
which they currently comply with the specifications of 40 CFR 51, Appendix P.
Details of each agency's continuous monitoring regulations are highlighted
in Section  III of this report.  Although most of the agencies which have
adopted CM regulations have followed the minimal requirements of Appendix P,
a few of those agencies have specific exemptions and/or exceptions peculiar
to a given agency's regulations.  Those unique characteristics of an agency's
CM provisions, such as extended time for compliance, additional sources re-
quired to monitor, etc., are also detailed in Section III.

-------
                                                 TABLE 1
                     VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES"
                                       i.e.. NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE CATEGORY
 OPACITY
STANDARD
                         STATES WHICH USE
         LOCALS
        WHICH USE
   OX
  10Z
  20Z
  30X
  40Z
  **
Maryland, District of Columbia
Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts , Michigan,  Minnesota,
                                               *
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico ,  New York,  Ohio,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota,  Tennessee,
                                            *
Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia , Puerto Rico
Illinois, Texas
Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana,  Iowa,  Kansas,
Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina,
                                    *
North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina , Tennessee,  Utah,  Vermont,
Wisconsin, Wyoming, Virgin Islands
New Hampshire, New Jersey,
Allegheny Co., Bay Area
APCD, Denver, Jefferson
Co., Philadelphia , Puget
Sound , South Coast AQMD
Chicago, Wayne Co.
Dade Co.  St. Louis
Boston
 Standard written only in units of Ringelmann Scale.
*No  visible  emissions  standard  for  "All Existing Sources".

-------

StAXB
Alabama
Alaaka
All MB*
Arkaaaa*
California
Colorado
Conoaecleuc
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
lUlnoi.
ladiaaa
Iowa
Kanaa.
Kentucky
Louiaiaaa
Jferyland
Maaaachuaetca
Michigan
Hianaaoca

Miaalaalppl
aiMouri
ifoncaaa
Sebraaka
Nevada
Hew Jeney
Haw Xaxtco
Xew Tork
Horth Carolina
A*B^HI

OPACHT
20Z
20Z
40Z
Equiv.
#2
20Z
20Z
20Z
20Z
20Z 4
40Z
Equlv.
n
40Z
40Z
30Z
40Z
40Z
40Z
40Z
20Z
40Z
OZ

20Z
20Z
20Z
40Z
Equlv.
11 or #2
ft or n
20Z
20Z
.
1
.
40Z


(^QEd^jUgJOl •QDdfTXOtfS
n »1-*J ala/hr
>20Z, 3 ain/hr
•2
12 "1L./2y/ht
>20Z. 3 ata/hr
20Z-40Z, 3 ain/hr
ft <40Z or 12.
3 aia/hr
ft >20Z, 3 ain/hr
4 15 Bin/24 hr
ft 4 12
»2 *l-«3. 3 aia/hr
»2 »2-*3, 3 ala/hr
12 >I2. 3 ala/hr
30Z-60Z. 8 Bin/
hr, 3 claaa/day
#2 >40Z. U ain/day
n

m
>20Z, 4 Bla/hr
»2 >40Z for 3 ala/
hr or U Bin/
caac. 3 hr*
Ho vialbl* *•!•-
•too*
ft i»2. 6 ala/hr
ft 20Z-40Z, 3 aia/
hr. 3 clawa/
20Z-40Z. 4 aia/
hr 4 40Z-60Z,
4 ala/hr
20Z-40Z. 4 Bin/
hr
n »n. 13 aln/hr
3 eiaaa/day
n or #2 ft-*2, fl-*3,
*2-l3. for
6 ala/hr
(variaa wichia
ft or *2 ft-43 or »2-*3.
4 aln/hr
r*
>20Z. 3 ain/hr
_
ft >ft, 1 aln/M aia
.
»2 >40Z, 3 ala/hr, or
20 ala/day
mAvmi
1 it 11' U 1C
—
KAMI or
soraa ctm
SCaldflOACT SOH«?Ckt9
Xnduaccial Precaaaaa
All Sourca*
Ettaclag Equip.
All
Sea. Air Cootaa.
Sourca*
Proeaaa Sourcaa 4
All SoureM
All Soureaa
All Sourcaa Hoc
Oebarwlaa Covered

Ealadng Sourca*
Exlatiag Source*
All Other Enljiloa
Source*
All Sourea*
All
Fncaailag of
Kacariala
Proeeaa Operaciona
AU Source*
All Source*.

Stationary Source
Other than Tacln.
All Source*
Induatclal Proc***
Equipment
Editing Faeilieie*.
X. 0. Regulated
All Source*
All Source*
All laatalletion* &
All Single Source*
All
All
.
All Source*
-
All Source*
-8-

-------

STAH 1

Berth Dakota

Ohio
Oklahoma

Ora(oa
faoaaylvaaia
Ihoda lalaad
South CaroUaa

South Dakota
Taaaaaaaa


Taxaa

Utah

Varaoat


Virfiaia
WaahlaitOB

Vaat Virginia
Wiacoaaia

Vyooing
D. C. *

Fuarto lice

Virgla lalAda

Allaghaay Co.
Bay Araa APCD

Boa coa
Chicago



Dada Co.
Daavar
Jaffaraoa Co.
Philaealphia

Pugac Souad
St. Loula
South Coaat
AQMD
Vayoa Co.
Mi
FOl "At

9PACXTT

BqulT.
n
20X
201

401
20X
20X


20X
20X or
40X

MX (3
Bia avo.
40X

20X or
40X

20X
20X

-
40X

40X
20X

20X

Equiv.
12
Io.ui».
Eaulv.
fl
.
tqoiv.
11.3


-
20X
201



-
Eaui*.
*1
-
«B9BB^» »— - •— —
i HHfTF1 «T»f "la ROT son

fl^ntSiTT MMTff TVi^BT^TTA*'^

n »2-»S, * Bia/hr

»1 20X-OOX, 3 Bia/hr
•1 20X-60X, 3 Bia/hr
20 Bia/day
>40X, 3 Bia/hr
20X-60X. 3 Bia/hr
>20X, 3 Bia/hr
n !2-*3, 3 Bia/hr.
or 20 Bia/day
•1 20X-60X, 3 Bia/hr
»1 or #2 >20X or >40X,
3 Bia/hr. 20 Bla/
day
>30X, 3 Bia/hr
) 6 hr/10 daya
fZ

>20X or >40X.
6 Bia/hr;
alwaya <60X
•
>20X, 13 Bia/
8 hr
fl fl-43, 3 Bla/hr
12 40X-80X, 3 Bia/
hr, 3 tiaaa/day
-
>20X, 2 Bia/hr
12 Bia/day
H 20X-«OX. 4 Bia/
X Bia
«2 >»2. 6 Bia/hr

*i. *1-I3. 3 Bia/hr
PI >ll. 3 Bia/hr

.
»1.3 I1.3W2. 4 Bia/
30 Bia; *l.i-
#3. 4 Bia/hr-
100 c bloving. ace.
#2 >«2, 3 Bia/hr
>20X, 3 Bia/hr

11 #1-43. 3 Bia/hr

11 >#i. 3 Bla/ar
-
»1 >#1, 3 Bia/hr

*1.S
^1
ICE JFECCTTC

SAME or
SOUKCI CITED

CAatiag laaeallatioaa

All Siagla Sourcaa
All Sourcaa

All Sourcaa
All
All
All Sourcaa

All Sourcaa
All Air Coataa. Sourcaa
4 "Cartaia Czlaclag
Sourcaa"
Stationary Flua

All ExUciag Siafla
Sourcaa
laatallacioaa


^^ Sourcaa
All Sourcaa

All
All Sourcaa Bafora
4/1/72
All Exlaclng Soureaa
All Sourcaa
(>100 TPT)
Scatioaary Sourca*

All Exiaciag Siagla
Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
\n Sourcaa

-
All Sourcaa



All Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
?racaaa Oparaciona
All Sourcaa (Zxcapc
taeia.)
All Sourcaa
-
Siagla Sourca of
Eaiaaion
All Sourcaa
-9-

-------
                 TABLE  3




UNITS OF ACUtCY APPROVED SOi EMISSION STANDARDS

STATK
ALABAMA

ALASKA
ANltUNA
ARKANSAS

CALIFORNIA

COLORADO
CONNECTICUT

DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA

HAWAII
IDAHO

ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA

KANSAS

KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA


HA1NK
MARYLAND
MASSAUIUSBTTS

MICHIGAN

H1NNKSOTA
MISSISSIPPI
HISSOUHI

MINTANA
FFFSG
lb/106 Btu
£
PP*
lb/106 Btu
_

Ib/hr and Pual S
£
PP*
lb/106 Blu and
Pual S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
Ib/hr*. Ik/106
Btu and Pual »
Pual S
Pual S

lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
(2 hr. avg.)
lb/106 Btu

lb/106 Btu
a
PP*


.
Pual S
Pual S .
(Ib S/10 Btu)
lb/106 Btu, pp..
and Pual S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
aud Fuel S
Pual S
SULPURIC
ACID
PI-ANTS
Ib/ton acid
a
PP"
10Z of • la f«ed'
..
A
PP*
£
PP*
Ib/ton acid

PP*
Ib/toa acid
Ib/ton acid

-
Ib/ton acid

PP*
Ib/hr*
Ib/ton acid
(2 hr. av|.)
-

Ib/ton acid
*
PP*
(3 hr. av(.)

_
*
PP"
Ih/rnn arid

_

Ib/ton acid
PP"
PP" or Ib/hr

_
SHELTERS
Cu Fb Zn
•m *- —
I t *
PP* PP" PP*


- - -
a a •
PP* PP" PP*
a a a
PP* PP* PP*
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr

•m — •
- .
Ib/hr" Ib/hr* Ib/hr*

.
Ib/hr (1 hr. avf.) * tona/7-day
parlod OR pp> and tpd
PP* PP* PP*
Ib/hr* Ib/hr* Ib/hr*
a a a
PP" PP* pp*

Ib/hr Ib/hr
OMW) (Haw)
• a a
PP* PM •••
* a a
PP* PP* - ^ PP*

*

* * *
PP" PP» PP«
* * *
mm OMB MM
B^B" Irr™* ^V
• • _

» — «
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr


Ib/hr ' Ib/hr lK/hr

-------
TABLE 3 (OONTIHUBD)



STATE
NEBRASKA

NEVADA

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK

NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA

OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA

RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TKNHRSSKE
TEXAS

UTAH
VUUKJUT

VIRGINIA


WASHINGTON
rfKST. VIRGINIA

HI SUMS IN

WYOMING




rnrsc
lb/106 Btu
<2 hr. •«•.)
lb/hr 
PIM! S
lb/106 »tu
Md PlMl S
lb/hr

£
PP"
lb/106 Btu
Md PlMl S
lb/106 B(u
(OM)
lb/106 Btu

UNiTl Of ACBRCT APPROVED SO, EMISSION STANDARDS

SULPURIC SMELTERS
PLANTS Cu Pb la
_ „ . —

lb/hr* Md pp** lb/hr Ife/hr* Md pp»* (M S)
(M S) <6 hr.mg.
Ib/toa Mid lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
i » • •
PP" PP" PP" M*


Ib/toa Mid -

Ib/ton Mid - -
- -
Ib/toa Mid Ib/br lb/hr lb/hr
Ib/ton Mid lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
(o«w) (MV) (a«w) (am)
-
• • *
PP" PP" PP" PP"
(2 hr. •»«.)
-
Ib/ton acid - -
- - - -
, * i. » ft
P.P" PP^ . PP", PP"
lb/hr and pp« PPM pfw pp*



• • «• ••

pp" Md lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
Ib/ton acid
• • L ft
•>«•_« BB4BAB1 ••••• MkJMm
fl**1 ~~— l^P^ PlP^
Ib/ton Mid lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr

Ib/ton Mid - -
(n«w)
PP"
(2 hr. «v|.)

-------
(CONTINUED)


ACUK1
D1ST. OP COL.
PUttTO MOO
VIDCU ISLANDS
ALuauon co.

•AY AUA APCD
HOSTON

CHICAGO
DAIW 00.
DDtHHstBl
VSHIWDV**
JErPMSON 00.
nULADKirUIA

PUCBT SOUWB
ST. LOUIS
SOUTH COAST
AQHD

HAYM CO.

PPPSC
Plwl S
Fuel S
*Ml S
Ik/10* Stu

ppa nd P«M! S
FIM! S

Fuel S
Ik/106 It*
•
PP*
Ik/U Bt«
lb/10* Ben
Md PlMl S
ppti Mid PlMl S
ppa md PlMl S
Ik/10* K« Md
PlMl S

m*i s
•_!>•<«_ mtmmAmrA ••* 41netll
SULPUIIC SNELTBRS
PLAMTS Cm Pk to
M . _^ ^ 	 t«

Ik/cm «eid lk/kr Ik/kr Ik/kt
- -
• * •
lk/COB Mid PP» PP« PP«
• • * •

-
• * • •

_ - - —
* • • •
""« ""• ""* ""•

_ - _ —

_
-
lk/hr aid pp> - -

• • *
Ik/Cm Mid ppa ppa TP»
r «»»c^ral
-------
 TABLE 4
UNITS

STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA

NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
>(EW YORK
OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO EMISSION

FFTSG
-


-
Ib/hr

Ib (aa NO.)
10 BCu
Ib (u NO.)
10° BCu
-
Ib (u N0;)
106 Btu"

lb/106 Bcu
lb/106 Bcu





. lb/106 BCu
lb/106 Bcu

lb/106 Beu







Ib/lO* Bcu

STANDARDS

NITRIC ACID PLANTS
ib/eon acid

Ib/con acid
(2 he. avg.)
-

-
Ib/coa acid

Ib/con acid
Ib/eon acid

Ib/eon acid

.
Ib/coo acid
Ib/coa acid

Ib CNO )
con acid
*
ppm
_
Ib/eon acid



Ib/eon aad
ppa




-13-

-------
                      TABLE  4  (CONTINUED)
UNITS
OP AGENCY-APPROVED M0_
EMISSION STANDARDS

STATE
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
DIST. OP COL.
PUERTO RICO
VUCIN ISLANDS
ALLEGHENY CO.
BAY AREA APCD
BOSTON
CHICAGO
DADE CO.
DENVER
JEFFERSON CO.
PHILADELPHIA
FFPSC
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
(natr)





lb/106 Btu
(2 hr. avg.)

Ib (aa NO )
106 Btu


lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu



pp.*
-


lb/106 Btu
NITRIC ACID PLANTS
lb/ton add
lb/ton acid
lb/ton acid
(n,w)
-




lb/ton acid
or ppm
PP"
-
—
Ib (aa NO.)
ton acid"

lb/ton acid
(2 hr. avg.)







*
ppm
lb/ton acid
PUGET SOUND

ST. LOUTS

SOOTH COAST AQKD
WATNE CO.
                      (2 hr. «vg.)
pp« (15 aln. avg.)
                          (2 hr.  avg.)
   E^aaion standard la for non-apaciflc sourca catagory, ».g.,
   "All  Exiating Sourcaa"
                             -14-

-------
                                                    TABLE 5
                       STATE/LOCAL AGENCY STATUS OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION
                                             FOR EXISTING SOURCES
 CLASS I
CLASS IA
CLASS II
CLASS III
CLASS IV
Indiana
Louisiana
Nevada
North Carolina

Bay Area APCD
South Coast AQMD



Alabama
Delaware
Minnesota
Missouri
Nebraska
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Tennessee
Virginia
Washington
California
Iowa
Kentucky
New Mexico
New York

Jefferson Co.



Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
Texas




Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Kansas
Maine
Puerto Rico
South Dakota
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Allegheny County
CLASS DESIGNATION
I   -  Meets or exceeds minimum requirements of Appendix P
       (40 CFR 51)
IA  -  Uses general form of Appendix P, but lacking in content or
       applicability as prescribed by Appendix P.
II  -  Details particular CM requirements for one or more Appendix P
       source categories, but far short of explicit specifications.
Ill -  General CM provisions, usually only identifies pollutant to
       monitor and associated source category
IV  *  No provisions for CM of any source categories designated
       in Appendix P
                                                    Maryland
                                                    Michigan
                                                    Mississippi
                                                    Montana
                                                    New Hampshire
                                                    New Jersey
                                                    North Dakota
                                                    Ohio
                                                    Oregon
                                                    Pennsylvania
                                                          Boston
                                                          Chicago
                                                          Dade County
                                                          Denver
                                                          Philadelphia
                                                          Puget Sound
                                                          St.  Louis
                                                          Wayne County

-------
                                 TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Pleat ntd Intaiuttont on the mene be/an completing}
                           2.
                                                       3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
•. T|TLE AND SUBTITLE
  Compilation  and Analysis of State Regulations
  for SO2» NOw, opacity, Continuous Monitoring
  and Applicable Test Methods    Executive Summarly
                                                       6 REPORT DATE
            6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  John  R. Cline lES), Paul  Stenburg  (ES),
  Keith Pelts  (ES),  Howard  Wright, Louis Paley
                                                        . PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
t. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND AOOREM
  Engineering-Science, Inc.  (ES)
  7903 Westpark Dr.
  McLean,  Va.   22101
                                                       10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS ,
  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
  Division of  Stationary Source Enf.   (EN-341)
  401 M St. S.W.
  Washington,  D.C.  20460
             13. TYPE OF REPORT ANQLPERIOD COVERED
                Final  to 1977
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
    Current copies of the air pollution control regulations of  all fifty states, three
.erritories, and twelve local agencies were reviewed for the purpose of compiling infor-
ation on emission standards, compliance test methods, and continuous emission monitoriro
is applied to existing stationary sources.  Specific pollutants  of interest were opacity
*°2' ^^^x' and sulfur compounds other than SO..  The intent of this review was to
dentify the assortment of types,  formats, and exemptions which  prevail in existing SIP
•emulations for selected sources  and pollutants, thereby providing guidance to EPA for
rriting future continuous emission monitoring regulations.  This report is not to be use<
is an all inclusive reference document for such information.

    The primary focus of this review and compilation was the following existing source
rategories:

                                  continued on next page
7.
                              KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
  Air Pollution Control
  Reliability
  Monitors
 Continuous
 Monitors
  13B
  14D
  14G
                                           IB. SECURITY CLASS (Tttix Rtforl)
                          21. NO. OF PAGES
  Unclassified
                                           2O SECURITY CLASS
                                                                     22. PRICE
CPA Fwoi 2220-1 (!»•». 4-77)   PNKVIOUB COITION is OMOicrt

-------
                                                       INSTRUCTIONS

   1   REPORT NUMBER
       Insert the EPA repoil number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

   2.  LEAVE BLANK

   3.  RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
       Reserved for use by each report recipient.

   4.  TITLE AND SUBTITLE
       Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
       type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
       number and include subtitle for the specific title.

   6.  REPORT DATE
       Each report shall cany a date indicating at least month and year.  Indicate the basis on which n was selected (e.g,. date of issue,  date of
       approval, date of preparation, etc.).

   6.  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
       Leave blank.

   7   AUTHOR(S)
       Give name(s) in conventional order (John R. Doe. J. Robert Doe. etc.).  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
       zation.

   &  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
       buert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.

   9.  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
       Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hireuchy.

   10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
       Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

   11. CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
       Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.

   12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
       Include ZIP code.

   13. TYPE OF  REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
       Indicate interim final, etc.. and if applicable, dates covered.

   14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
       Insert appropriate code.

   IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
       Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as:  Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of. Presented'at conference of,
       To be published in. Supersedes, Supplements, etc

   IS. ABSTRACT
       Include a brief (200 words or lea) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
       •jgn'finnt bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.

   17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
       (a) DESCRIPTORS • Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the major
       concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.

       (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
       ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.

       (c) COSAT1 FIELD GROUP • Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 196S COSATI Subject Category List.  Since the ma-
       jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
       endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
       the primary posting(s).

   18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
       Denote rekuabilily to the pubjk or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
       the public, with address and price.

   19. ft 20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
       DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

   Zi. NUMBER  Of PAGES
       Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.

   22. PRICE
       Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Pom. 2220.1 (R«». 4-77) (R«**r**)

-------
cont./py2
                         OPACITY

o    Fossil  Cuel-firea  steam generators (FKPSG)

o    Portland cement  plants

o    Catalvst regenerators of fluio bed catalytic
     crack in9 units  (FBCCu)

o    tloo fuol-fired boilers

o    Kraft recovery  furnaces

o    basic oxygen  process furnaces (BOJfF)

o    Ferroalloy  electric subRer«jpci arc furnaces
                            ..
       X                  ~——£.

O    PPPhd                  O    FFFSii

o    Uitric  acid plants    o    f»nlturic acid
                                  plants

                            o    Shelters

     The  report is organized into a separate Executive
Surr.irtary a no  three volumes.   Tne first volume contains
an analysis  of state aoo;>ted enission standorcis  for
opacity,  bO. ,  NO , malfunctions and scheduled
maintenance,  ana continuous n.onitorinq regulations for
existino  stationary sources.  Voluire II provi'ies  a
tabular summary of key conponents of the epnlicahls
emission  standards ano reaulations includinq source
category, n»iniaiuiv source canacity, averaoinu tir.ie of
standard, exemptions, etc.   Voluiie III of  the  reoort
contains  the complete t«xt of the reoulations  cited.
               <• u s omuBMin mnwcoim. uirSi-U7/9

-------