United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Enforcement
Washington DC 20460
EPA 340/1-78-O09*
July 1978
Air Enforcement
Compilation and
Analysis of State
Regulations for SO2*
NOX, Opacity,
Continuous Monitoring,
and Applicable
Test Methods
Stationary Source
Enforcement Series
Executive
Summary
-------
COMPILATION AND ANALYSIS OF
STATE REGULATIONS FOR
SO,, NO , OPACITY, CONTINUOUS MONITORING,
AND APPLICABLE TEST METHODS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-01-4146
TASK ORDER 40
Presented to
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Stationary Source Enforcement
401 M Street, S. W.
Washington, D. C. 20460
EPA Project Officer: John R. Busik
EPA Task Manager: Howard Wright
Presented by
Engineering-Science
7903 Westpark Drive
McLean, Virginia 22101
June 2, 1978
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR "ALL
EXISTING SOURCES", i.e.. NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE
CATEGORY
TABLE 2 AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS
FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES," i.e., NOT SOURCE
SPECIFIC
TABLE 3 UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED SOg EMISSION STANDARDS
TABLE 4 UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO EMISSION STANDARDS
TABLE 5 STATE/LOCAL AGENCY STATUS OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING
IMPLEMENTATION FOR EXISTING SOURCES
8
10
13
15
-------
FOREWORD
This research was performed for the Division of
Stationary Source Enforcement (DSSE), Environmental
Protection Agency under Task Order No. 40, EPA Contract
No. 68-01-4146. Mr. Howard Wright, Compliance Monitoring
Branch, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement was
the EPA Task Manager.
Because this document is a product of the efforts
of many individuals, it is impossible to acknowledge
each person who has contriouted. however, special
recognition is
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report is issued by the Office of Enforcement,
Environmental Protection Agency. Copies are available
for a nominal cost from the National Technical Information
service, 52b5 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA. 22161.
The opinions expressed in this report are those of the
producing contractor and are not necessarily those of
the u.a. Environmental Protection Aoency. This report
is not to be used as an all inclusive reference document
for existing SIP regulations for selected sources and
pollutants.
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Current copies of the air pollution control regulations of all fifty
states, three territories, and twelve local agencies were reviewed for the
purpose of compiling information on a nationwide basis relevant to emission
standards, compliance test methods, and continuous emission monitoring, as
applied to existing stationary sources. Specific pollutants of interest
were opacity, SO., NO , and sulfur compounds other than SO,. For the
primary focus of this review and compilation, DSSE identified the following
existing source categories and associated pollutants for which details of the
applicable emission standards are of primary concern:
OPACITY
o Fossil fuel-fired steam generators (FFFSG)
o Portland cement plants
o Catalyst regenerators of fluid bed catalytic cracking
units (FBCCU)
o Hog fuel-fired boilers
o Kraft recovery furnaces
o Basic oxygen process furnaces (BOPF)
o Ferroalloy electric submerged arc furnaces
S02
NO
o FFFSG o FFFSG
o Sulfuric acid o Nitric acid plants
plants
o Smelters
Most state and local agencies' regulations contain a provision restrict-
ing visible emissions for a generalised, non-specific grouping of sources
and equipment herein referred to as "all existing sources". Inclusion of
such a broad-based opacity standard within an agency's regulations virtually
assures widespread, applicability of that visible emission limitation.
-1-
-------
Sources not subject to a specific emission standard addressed especially to
a select source group are, nevertheless! usually governed by the all-en-
compassing standard for "all existing sources". The state agencies of New
Hampshire and New Jersey together with the Boston >local agency were the only
agencies of those reviewed that did not have some form of generalized opacity
standard for "all existing sources". For this nonspecific source grouping
the agencies are rather evenly divided between an opacity standard of 20%
and one of 40Z. The District of Columbia enjoys the unique dlstiction of
being the only agency to prohibit visible emissions (i.e., 0% opacity) from
all existing stationary sources within its jurisdiction. Maryland prohibits
visible emissions from existing sources in certain "Areas" of that state.
Seven of the agencies surveyed express their visible emissions limitation
for this wide-ranged category solely in units of the Ringelmann scale. Table
1 summarizes the variation in the standards for visible emissions from "all
existing sources".
Ten of the agencies reviewed provide for no exception to the opacity
standard for "all existing sources". The remaining 52 agencies with this
type of opacity standard allow some period during which the visible emissions
standard may be exceeded. Generally, this exception period for intermittent
excursions ranges from 3-5 minutes per hour. In addition to providing for
emissions above the standard, some of the agencies specify (1) how high
above the standard the emissions may extend as well as (2) how long of a
period the emissions may remain above the standard each day. Table 2
summarizes each state's opacity standard, allowable exception and permissible
periods above the standard for the generalized category of "all existing
sources",
The situations concerning opacity standards for existing Fossil Fuel-
Fired Steam Generators (FFFSG) and for existing Hog Fuel-Fired Boilers are
very similar. In both cases the agencies rarely use these specific termin-
ologies as the subject source caetgory for a visible emissions standard.
Florida is the only agency' for which there is a specific opacity standard
-2-
-------
for existing FFFSG, and Washington has the only opacity standard addressed
specifically to Hog Fuel Boilers. In both instances these kinds of
facilities are included within a more general grouping of sources for which
an opacity standard has been adopted by an agency. Such source groupings as
"fuel burning equipment", "indirect heating equipment" and "combustion install-
ations" are the common denominators used by the agencies from which FFFSG and
Hog Fuel Boilers both comprise sub-sets. Under these circumstances 13 states
and 3 locals have specific opacity standards capable of being directly trans-
lated to FFFSG. Similarly, 12 states and 3 locals have opacity standards
directly applicable to Hog Fuel-Fired Boilers. Section II elaborates on
the details of these specific agency regulations pertinent to the two source
groups.
For the other five categories of existing stationary sources and associ-
ated opacity standards of interest to DSSE, the extent of visible emissions
standards is rather minimal. Four states (Arizona, Georgia, Minnesota,
New York) currently have visible emissions standards applicable to existing
Portland Cement Plants. Likewise, four states (Louisiana, Minnesota, New
Mexico, Washington) have opacity standards expressly for existing Catalyst
Regenerators at Fluid Bed Catalytic Cracking Units (FBCCU). Washington is
the only agency with a visible emissions standard prescribed for Kraft
Recovery Furnaces. None of the state or local agency regulations contain
specific provisions for opacity standards for either existing Basic Oxygen
Process Furnaces (BOPF) or existing Ferroalloy Electric Submerged Arc
Furnaces. The specifics on the few regulations pertinent to these source
categories are detailed in Section II.
The most widespread means used by state and local agencies for specify-
ing S02 emission standards for existing FFFSG is either on the basis of
heat input, as pounds of S02 per million Btu, or in terms of restrictions on
the amount of sulfur contained in the fuel. Of the 65 agencies reviewed,
36 agencies specify a lb/106 Btu standard and 28 agencies define the allow-
able fuel sulfur content. S02 emission standards for existing FFFSG in terms
-3-
-------
of concentration, ppm S02, or of mass emission rate, Ib SO^/hour, are used
to a much lesser extent. Only the states of Arkansas, Maine and Rhode Island
are without some form of S02 emission limitation on existing FFFSG.
SO2 emission standards for existing sulfuric acid plants are expressed
in terms of Ib S02 per ton of 100Z acid and ppm as S02. The most prevalent
usage for standards directly applicable to this source category is the Ib/ton
expression. The units of ppm are used in most cases of a generalized SO-
emission standard applicable to a variety of industrial processes including
sulfuric acid manufacturing. Of the 46 agencies with an S02 emission standard
applicable to sulfuric acid plants, 25 of those standards are written expressly
for that group of affected facilities.
Similar to the units used for sulfuric acid plant emission limitations,
emission standards for existing non-ferrous smelters are written in terms of
ppm as S02 and Ib SOj/hr. In most cases the units of Ib S02/hr are used
when the standard applies specifically to smelters, while ppm is a more common-
place unit for standards restricting SO, from a variety of sources. Of the
14 agency emission standards directly addressing smelters, 12 of those
standards are expressed in units of Ib S02/hr while only 2 are written in
terms of ppm SOj. Table 3 is a tabular summary of agency 30^ emission
standards for the source categories of FFFSG, sulfuric acid plants and non-
ferrous smelters.
Nitrogen oxides (NO ) emission standards for existing FFFSG are usually
* £
written in terms of Ibs NO/10 Btu. All but one of the 16 state agencies
with this particular emission standard have used that system of units.
Similarly, state emission standards for existing nitric acid plants are
usually expressed in units of Ib NO per ton of 100Z acid. Although 2 states
have adopted standards in ppm NO for existing nitric acid plants, 14 states
have adopted the Ib NO /ton expression as the emission standard for that
group of existing facilities. Table 4 is a tabular summary of agency NO^
emission standards for the source categories of FFFSG and nitric acid plants.
-4-
-------
Section II of this report contains more of the specific details pertinent to
the opacity, SO. and NO emission standards for these source categories In
question.
A rather commonplace provision of visible emission standards Is the
exception period whereby a source is permitted to intermittently exceed the
standard during brief periods of time. Most agencies also have a general,
across-the-board provision which allows excess emissions during periods of
equipment malfunction and for control equipment maintenance. Of the 65 agency
regulations reviewed, only 8 states and 3 locals were lacking some form of
regulation which specifically addresses malfunction and/or maintenance occur-
rences and their associated excess emissions. The majority of these types
of provisions are neither specific to a given pollutant nor directed to a
given source group.
Almost all of the agencies with malfunction/maintenance provisions
require agency notification of such occurrences. Although the information
required for notification of a scheduled maintenance shutdown are somewhat
universal, the remaining details of malfunction/maintenance provisions
are extremely variable. While some agencies require notification within
24 hours, others allow 10 days for notification of malfunctions. Although
some agencies have provisions for follow-up reporting of remedial actions,
others do not even have a requirement for agency notification upon correction
of the incident and termination of the excess emissions. None of the agencies
have enforcement provisions directing the affected source operations to be
immediately shutdown during malfunction or maintenance events, but a few
agencies do have explicit conditions that will allow the source to continue
operation either for only a brief time or for an indefinite period of time.
Section II of this report summarizes the variation in the agency regulations
dealing with malfunctions and scheduled maintenance.
A survey of the extent to which individual state and local agencies
have complied with the requirement for provisions of continuous monitoring
-5-
-------
regulations in accordance with 40 CFR 51 confirmed that the agencies' status
range from one extreme to the other. Some agencies currently comply with
all facets of the Part 51 "Minimum Emission Monitoring Requirements" of
Appendix P, and in a*fev cases have more -comprehensive regulations than the
minimal requirements. Conversely, some agencies have yet to adopt any of
the required Part 51 CM provisions. As shown in Table 5, the agencies have
been ranked from Class I and IA to Class IV, depending upon the degree to
which they currently comply with the specifications of 40 CFR 51, Appendix P.
Details of each agency's continuous monitoring regulations are highlighted
in Section III of this report. Although most of the agencies which have
adopted CM regulations have followed the minimal requirements of Appendix P,
a few of those agencies have specific exemptions and/or exceptions peculiar
to a given agency's regulations. Those unique characteristics of an agency's
CM provisions, such as extended time for compliance, additional sources re-
quired to monitor, etc., are also detailed in Section III.
-------
TABLE 1
VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES"
i.e.. NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE CATEGORY
OPACITY
STANDARD
STATES WHICH USE
LOCALS
WHICH USE
OX
10Z
20Z
30X
40Z
**
Maryland, District of Columbia
Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts , Michigan, Minnesota,
*
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico , New York, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee,
*
Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia , Puerto Rico
Illinois, Texas
Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina,
*
North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina , Tennessee, Utah, Vermont,
Wisconsin, Wyoming, Virgin Islands
New Hampshire, New Jersey,
Allegheny Co., Bay Area
APCD, Denver, Jefferson
Co., Philadelphia , Puget
Sound , South Coast AQMD
Chicago, Wayne Co.
Dade Co. St. Louis
Boston
Standard written only in units of Ringelmann Scale.
*No visible emissions standard for "All Existing Sources".
-------
StAXB
Alabama
Alaaka
All MB*
Arkaaaa*
California
Colorado
Conoaecleuc
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
lUlnoi.
ladiaaa
Iowa
Kanaa.
Kentucky
Louiaiaaa
Jferyland
Maaaachuaetca
Michigan
Hianaaoca
Miaalaalppl
aiMouri
ifoncaaa
Sebraaka
Nevada
Hew Jeney
Haw Xaxtco
Xew Tork
Horth Carolina
A*B^HI
OPACHT
20Z
20Z
40Z
Equiv.
#2
20Z
20Z
20Z
20Z
20Z 4
40Z
Equlv.
n
40Z
40Z
30Z
40Z
40Z
40Z
40Z
20Z
40Z
OZ
20Z
20Z
20Z
40Z
Equlv.
11 or #2
ft or n
20Z
20Z
.
1
.
40Z
(^QEd^jUgJOl •QDdfTXOtfS
n »1-*J ala/hr
>20Z, 3 ain/hr
•2
12 "1L./2y/ht
>20Z. 3 ata/hr
20Z-40Z, 3 ain/hr
ft <40Z or 12.
3 aia/hr
ft >20Z, 3 ain/hr
4 15 Bin/24 hr
ft 4 12
»2 *l-«3. 3 aia/hr
»2 »2-*3, 3 ala/hr
12 >I2. 3 ala/hr
30Z-60Z. 8 Bin/
hr, 3 claaa/day
#2 >40Z. U ain/day
n
m
>20Z, 4 Bla/hr
»2 >40Z for 3 ala/
hr or U Bin/
caac. 3 hr*
Ho vialbl* *•!•-
•too*
ft i»2. 6 ala/hr
ft 20Z-40Z, 3 aia/
hr. 3 clawa/
20Z-40Z. 4 aia/
hr 4 40Z-60Z,
4 ala/hr
20Z-40Z. 4 Bin/
hr
n »n. 13 aln/hr
3 eiaaa/day
n or #2 ft-*2, fl-*3,
*2-l3. for
6 ala/hr
(variaa wichia
ft or *2 ft-43 or »2-*3.
4 aln/hr
r*
>20Z. 3 ain/hr
_
ft >ft, 1 aln/M aia
.
»2 >40Z, 3 ala/hr, or
20 ala/day
mAvmi
1 it 11' U 1C
—
KAMI or
soraa ctm
SCaldflOACT SOH«?Ckt9
Xnduaccial Precaaaaa
All Sourca*
Ettaclag Equip.
All
Sea. Air Cootaa.
Sourca*
Proeaaa Sourcaa 4
All SoureM
All Soureaa
All Sourcaa Hoc
Oebarwlaa Covered
Ealadng Sourca*
Exlatiag Source*
All Other Enljiloa
Source*
All Sourea*
All
Fncaailag of
Kacariala
Proeeaa Operaciona
AU Source*
All Source*.
Stationary Source
Other than Tacln.
All Source*
Induatclal Proc***
Equipment
Editing Faeilieie*.
X. 0. Regulated
All Source*
All Source*
All laatalletion* &
All Single Source*
All
All
.
All Source*
-
All Source*
-8-
-------
STAH 1
Berth Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ora(oa
faoaaylvaaia
Ihoda lalaad
South CaroUaa
South Dakota
Taaaaaaaa
Taxaa
Utah
Varaoat
Virfiaia
WaahlaitOB
Vaat Virginia
Wiacoaaia
Vyooing
D. C. *
Fuarto lice
Virgla lalAda
Allaghaay Co.
Bay Araa APCD
Boa coa
Chicago
Dada Co.
Daavar
Jaffaraoa Co.
Philaealphia
Pugac Souad
St. Loula
South Coaat
AQMD
Vayoa Co.
Mi
FOl "At
9PACXTT
BqulT.
n
20X
201
401
20X
20X
20X
20X or
40X
MX (3
Bia avo.
40X
20X or
40X
20X
20X
-
40X
40X
20X
20X
Equiv.
12
Io.ui».
Eaulv.
fl
.
tqoiv.
11.3
-
20X
201
-
Eaui*.
*1
-
«B9BB^» »— - •— —
i HHfTF1 «T»f "la ROT son
fl^ntSiTT MMTff TVi^BT^TTA*'^
n »2-»S, * Bia/hr
»1 20X-OOX, 3 Bia/hr
•1 20X-60X, 3 Bia/hr
20 Bia/day
>40X, 3 Bia/hr
20X-60X. 3 Bia/hr
>20X, 3 Bia/hr
n !2-*3, 3 Bia/hr.
or 20 Bia/day
•1 20X-60X, 3 Bia/hr
»1 or #2 >20X or >40X,
3 Bia/hr. 20 Bla/
day
>30X, 3 Bia/hr
) 6 hr/10 daya
fZ
>20X or >40X.
6 Bia/hr;
alwaya <60X
•
>20X, 13 Bia/
8 hr
fl fl-43, 3 Bla/hr
12 40X-80X, 3 Bia/
hr, 3 tiaaa/day
-
>20X, 2 Bia/hr
12 Bia/day
H 20X-«OX. 4 Bia/
X Bia
«2 >»2. 6 Bia/hr
*i. *1-I3. 3 Bia/hr
PI >ll. 3 Bia/hr
.
»1.3 I1.3W2. 4 Bia/
30 Bia; *l.i-
#3. 4 Bia/hr-
100 c bloving. ace.
#2 >«2, 3 Bia/hr
>20X, 3 Bia/hr
11 #1-43. 3 Bia/hr
11 >#i. 3 Bla/ar
-
»1 >#1, 3 Bia/hr
*1.S
^1
ICE JFECCTTC
SAME or
SOUKCI CITED
CAatiag laaeallatioaa
All Siagla Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
All
All
All Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
All Air Coataa. Sourcaa
4 "Cartaia Czlaclag
Sourcaa"
Stationary Flua
All ExUciag Siafla
Sourcaa
laatallacioaa
^^ Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
All
All Sourcaa Bafora
4/1/72
All Exlaclng Soureaa
All Sourcaa
(>100 TPT)
Scatioaary Sourca*
All Exiaciag Siagla
Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
\n Sourcaa
-
All Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
All Sourcaa
?racaaa Oparaciona
All Sourcaa (Zxcapc
taeia.)
All Sourcaa
-
Siagla Sourca of
Eaiaaion
All Sourcaa
-9-
-------
TABLE 3
UNITS OF ACUtCY APPROVED SOi EMISSION STANDARDS
STATK
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ANltUNA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
HA1NK
MARYLAND
MASSAUIUSBTTS
MICHIGAN
H1NNKSOTA
MISSISSIPPI
HISSOUHI
MINTANA
FFFSG
lb/106 Btu
£
PP*
lb/106 Btu
_
Ib/hr and Pual S
£
PP*
lb/106 Blu and
Pual S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
Ib/hr*. Ik/106
Btu and Pual »
Pual S
Pual S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
(2 hr. avg.)
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
a
PP*
.
Pual S
Pual S .
(Ib S/10 Btu)
lb/106 Btu, pp..
and Pual S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
aud Fuel S
Pual S
SULPURIC
ACID
PI-ANTS
Ib/ton acid
a
PP"
10Z of • la f«ed'
..
A
PP*
£
PP*
Ib/ton acid
PP*
Ib/toa acid
Ib/ton acid
-
Ib/ton acid
PP*
Ib/hr*
Ib/ton acid
(2 hr. av|.)
-
Ib/ton acid
*
PP*
(3 hr. av(.)
_
*
PP"
Ih/rnn arid
_
Ib/ton acid
PP"
PP" or Ib/hr
_
SHELTERS
Cu Fb Zn
•m *- —
I t *
PP* PP" PP*
- - -
a a •
PP* PP" PP*
a a a
PP* PP* PP*
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr
•m — •
- .
Ib/hr" Ib/hr* Ib/hr*
.
Ib/hr (1 hr. avf.) * tona/7-day
parlod OR pp> and tpd
PP* PP* PP*
Ib/hr* Ib/hr* Ib/hr*
a a a
PP" PP* pp*
Ib/hr Ib/hr
OMW) (Haw)
• a a
PP* PM •••
* a a
PP* PP* - ^ PP*
*
* * *
PP" PP» PP«
* * *
mm OMB MM
B^B" Irr™* ^V
• • _
» — «
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr
Ib/hr ' Ib/hr lK/hr
-------
TABLE 3 (OONTIHUBD)
STATE
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TKNHRSSKE
TEXAS
UTAH
VUUKJUT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
rfKST. VIRGINIA
HI SUMS IN
WYOMING
rnrsc
lb/106 Btu
<2 hr. •«•.)
lb/hr
PIM! S
lb/106 »tu
Md PlMl S
lb/hr
£
PP"
lb/106 Btu
Md PlMl S
lb/106 B(u
(OM)
lb/106 Btu
UNiTl Of ACBRCT APPROVED SO, EMISSION STANDARDS
SULPURIC SMELTERS
PLANTS Cu Pb la
_ „ . —
lb/hr* Md pp** lb/hr Ife/hr* Md pp»* (M S)
(M S) <6 hr.mg.
Ib/toa Mid lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
i » • •
PP" PP" PP" M*
Ib/toa Mid -
Ib/ton Mid - -
- -
Ib/toa Mid Ib/br lb/hr lb/hr
Ib/ton Mid lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
(o«w) (MV) (a«w) (am)
-
• • *
PP" PP" PP" PP"
(2 hr. •»«.)
-
Ib/ton acid - -
- - - -
, * i. » ft
P.P" PP^ . PP", PP"
lb/hr and pp« PPM pfw pp*
• • «• ••
pp" Md lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
Ib/ton acid
• • L ft
•>«•_« BB4BAB1 ••••• MkJMm
fl**1 ~~— l^P^ PlP^
Ib/ton Mid lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr
Ib/ton Mid - -
(n«w)
PP"
(2 hr. «v|.)
-------
(CONTINUED)
ACUK1
D1ST. OP COL.
PUttTO MOO
VIDCU ISLANDS
ALuauon co.
•AY AUA APCD
HOSTON
CHICAGO
DAIW 00.
DDtHHstBl
VSHIWDV**
JErPMSON 00.
nULADKirUIA
PUCBT SOUWB
ST. LOUIS
SOUTH COAST
AQHD
HAYM CO.
PPPSC
Plwl S
Fuel S
*Ml S
Ik/10* Stu
ppa nd P«M! S
FIM! S
Fuel S
Ik/106 It*
•
PP*
Ik/U Bt«
lb/10* Ben
Md PlMl S
ppti Mid PlMl S
ppa md PlMl S
Ik/10* K« Md
PlMl S
m*i s
•_!>•<«_ mtmmAmrA ••* 41netll
SULPUIIC SNELTBRS
PLAMTS Cm Pk to
M . _^ ^ t«
Ik/cm «eid lk/kr Ik/kr Ik/kt
- -
• * •
lk/COB Mid PP» PP« PP«
• • * •
-
• * • •
_ - - —
* • • •
""« ""• ""* ""•
_ - _ —
_
-
lk/hr aid pp> - -
• • *
Ik/Cm Mid ppa ppa TP»
r «»»c^ral
-------
TABLE 4
UNITS
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
>(EW YORK
OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO EMISSION
FFTSG
-
-
Ib/hr
Ib (aa NO.)
10 BCu
Ib (u NO.)
10° BCu
-
Ib (u N0;)
106 Btu"
lb/106 Bcu
lb/106 Bcu
. lb/106 BCu
lb/106 Bcu
lb/106 Beu
Ib/lO* Bcu
STANDARDS
NITRIC ACID PLANTS
ib/eon acid
Ib/con acid
(2 he. avg.)
-
-
Ib/coa acid
Ib/con acid
Ib/eon acid
Ib/eon acid
.
Ib/coo acid
Ib/coa acid
Ib CNO )
con acid
*
ppm
_
Ib/eon acid
Ib/eon aad
ppa
-13-
-------
TABLE 4 (CONTINUED)
UNITS
OP AGENCY-APPROVED M0_
EMISSION STANDARDS
STATE
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
DIST. OP COL.
PUERTO RICO
VUCIN ISLANDS
ALLEGHENY CO.
BAY AREA APCD
BOSTON
CHICAGO
DADE CO.
DENVER
JEFFERSON CO.
PHILADELPHIA
FFPSC
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
(natr)
lb/106 Btu
(2 hr. avg.)
Ib (aa NO )
106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
pp.*
-
lb/106 Btu
NITRIC ACID PLANTS
lb/ton add
lb/ton acid
lb/ton acid
(n,w)
-
lb/ton acid
or ppm
PP"
-
—
Ib (aa NO.)
ton acid"
lb/ton acid
(2 hr. avg.)
*
ppm
lb/ton acid
PUGET SOUND
ST. LOUTS
SOOTH COAST AQKD
WATNE CO.
(2 hr. «vg.)
pp« (15 aln. avg.)
(2 hr. avg.)
E^aaion standard la for non-apaciflc sourca catagory, ».g.,
"All Exiating Sourcaa"
-14-
-------
TABLE 5
STATE/LOCAL AGENCY STATUS OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION
FOR EXISTING SOURCES
CLASS I
CLASS IA
CLASS II
CLASS III
CLASS IV
Indiana
Louisiana
Nevada
North Carolina
Bay Area APCD
South Coast AQMD
Alabama
Delaware
Minnesota
Missouri
Nebraska
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Tennessee
Virginia
Washington
California
Iowa
Kentucky
New Mexico
New York
Jefferson Co.
Connecticut
Florida
Georgia
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
Texas
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
District of Columbia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Kansas
Maine
Puerto Rico
South Dakota
Utah
Vermont
Virgin Islands
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Allegheny County
CLASS DESIGNATION
I - Meets or exceeds minimum requirements of Appendix P
(40 CFR 51)
IA - Uses general form of Appendix P, but lacking in content or
applicability as prescribed by Appendix P.
II - Details particular CM requirements for one or more Appendix P
source categories, but far short of explicit specifications.
Ill - General CM provisions, usually only identifies pollutant to
monitor and associated source category
IV * No provisions for CM of any source categories designated
in Appendix P
Maryland
Michigan
Mississippi
Montana
New Hampshire
New Jersey
North Dakota
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Boston
Chicago
Dade County
Denver
Philadelphia
Puget Sound
St. Louis
Wayne County
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Pleat ntd Intaiuttont on the mene be/an completing}
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
•. T|TLE AND SUBTITLE
Compilation and Analysis of State Regulations
for SO2» NOw, opacity, Continuous Monitoring
and Applicable Test Methods Executive Summarly
6 REPORT DATE
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
John R. Cline lES), Paul Stenburg (ES),
Keith Pelts (ES), Howard Wright, Louis Paley
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
t. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND AOOREM
Engineering-Science, Inc. (ES)
7903 Westpark Dr.
McLean, Va. 22101
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS ,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Stationary Source Enf. (EN-341)
401 M St. S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
13. TYPE OF REPORT ANQLPERIOD COVERED
Final to 1977
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
Current copies of the air pollution control regulations of all fifty states, three
.erritories, and twelve local agencies were reviewed for the purpose of compiling infor-
ation on emission standards, compliance test methods, and continuous emission monitoriro
is applied to existing stationary sources. Specific pollutants of interest were opacity
*°2' ^^^x' and sulfur compounds other than SO.. The intent of this review was to
dentify the assortment of types, formats, and exemptions which prevail in existing SIP
•emulations for selected sources and pollutants, thereby providing guidance to EPA for
rriting future continuous emission monitoring regulations. This report is not to be use<
is an all inclusive reference document for such information.
The primary focus of this review and compilation was the following existing source
rategories:
continued on next page
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Air Pollution Control
Reliability
Monitors
Continuous
Monitors
13B
14D
14G
IB. SECURITY CLASS (Tttix Rtforl)
21. NO. OF PAGES
Unclassified
2O SECURITY CLASS
22. PRICE
CPA Fwoi 2220-1 (!»•». 4-77) PNKVIOUB COITION is OMOicrt
-------
INSTRUCTIONS
1 REPORT NUMBER
Insert the EPA repoil number as it appears on the cover of the publication.
2. LEAVE BLANK
3. RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
Reserved for use by each report recipient.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
number and include subtitle for the specific title.
6. REPORT DATE
Each report shall cany a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which n was selected (e.g,. date of issue, date of
approval, date of preparation, etc.).
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
Leave blank.
7 AUTHOR(S)
Give name(s) in conventional order (John R. Doe. J. Robert Doe. etc.). List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
zation.
& PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
buert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hireuchy.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Include ZIP code.
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Indicate interim final, etc.. and if applicable, dates covered.
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
Insert appropriate code.
IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as: Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of. Presented'at conference of,
To be published in. Supersedes, Supplements, etc
IS. ABSTRACT
Include a brief (200 words or lea) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
•jgn'finnt bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
(a) DESCRIPTORS • Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the major
concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.
(b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.
(c) COSAT1 FIELD GROUP • Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 196S COSATI Subject Category List. Since the ma-
jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
the primary posting(s).
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Denote rekuabilily to the pubjk or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
the public, with address and price.
19. ft 20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.
Zi. NUMBER Of PAGES
Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.
22. PRICE
Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Pom. 2220.1 (R«». 4-77) (R«**r**)
-------
cont./py2
OPACITY
o Fossil Cuel-firea steam generators (FKPSG)
o Portland cement plants
o Catalvst regenerators of fluio bed catalytic
crack in9 units (FBCCu)
o tloo fuol-fired boilers
o Kraft recovery furnaces
o basic oxygen process furnaces (BOJfF)
o Ferroalloy electric subRer«jpci arc furnaces
..
X ~——£.
O PPPhd O FFFSii
o Uitric acid plants o f»nlturic acid
plants
o Shelters
The report is organized into a separate Executive
Surr.irtary a no three volumes. Tne first volume contains
an analysis of state aoo;>ted enission standorcis for
opacity, bO. , NO , malfunctions and scheduled
maintenance, ana continuous n.onitorinq regulations for
existino stationary sources. Voluire II provi'ies a
tabular summary of key conponents of the epnlicahls
emission standards ano reaulations includinq source
category, n»iniaiuiv source canacity, averaoinu tir.ie of
standard, exemptions, etc. Voluiie III of the reoort
contains the complete t«xt of the reoulations cited.
<• u s omuBMin mnwcoim. uirSi-U7/9
------- |