United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Enforcement
Washington DC 20460
EPA 340/1-78-009b
July 1978
Air Enforcement
Compilation and
Analysis of State
Regulations for SO2*
IMOX, Opacity,
Continuous  Monitoring,
and Applicable
Test Methods
Stationary Source
Enforcement Series
        Volume I

-------
       COMPILATION AND ANALYSIS OF

          STATE REGULATIONS FOR

S02, NOX, OPACITY, CONTINUOUS MONITORING

       AND APPLICABLE TEST METHODS

                VOLUME I
        EPA CONTRACT NO.  68-01-4146

               TASK ORDER 40
                Presented to

   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
 Division of Stationary Source Enforcement
            401 M Street, S.W.
          Washington, D.C.  20460

    EPA Project Officer:  John R. Busik
    EPA Task Manager:     Howard Wright
                Presented by

             Engineering-Science
             7903 Westpark Drive
            McLean,  Virginia 22101
              June 2, 1978

-------
                            TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                VOLUME I
                                                                     Page
SECTION I
SECTION II
 SECTION III
INTRODUCTION                                           1-1
BACKGROUND                                             1-2
STATE-ADOPTED EMISSION STANDARDS
FOR EXISTING STATIONARY SOURCES                       II-l
OPACITY                                               II-2

SULFUR DIOXIDE (S02)                                  11-15
NITROGEN OXIDES                                       11-24
MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE                11-24

STATE-ADOPTED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
FOR EXISTING STATIONARY SOURCES                      III-l
                              LIST OF TABLES
 TABLE II-l    VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR "ALL
               EXISTING SOURCES" i.e., NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE CATEGORY  II-4

 TABLE II-2    ALLOWABLE EXCEPTIONS TO VISIBLE EMISSION STANDARDS
               FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES" i.e., NON-SPECIFIC
               SOURCE CATEGORY                                       II-5

 TABLE II-3    AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR
               "ALL EXISTING SOURCES," i.e., NOT SOURCE SPECIFIC     II-7

 TABLE II-4    VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR
               EXISTING FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED STEAM GENERATORS (FFFSG)   11-10

 TABLE II-5    STATE-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR
               EXISTING FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED STEAM GENERATORS           11-11

 TABLE II-6    STATE-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR
               EXISTING PORTLAND CEMENT PLANTS                       11-12

-------
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
                                                                      Page
TABLE II-7


TABLE II-8


TABLE II-9



TABLE 11-10


TABLE 11-11



TABLE 11-12

TABLE 11-13


TABLE 11-14

TABLE 11-15
STATE-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR
EXISTING FBCCU CATALYST REGENERATORS                    11-13

AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR
EXISTING HOG FUEL-FIRED BOILERS                         11-14

TYPES OF SO. EMISSION STANDARDS USED BY STATE AND
LOCAL AGENCIES FOR EXISTING FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED
STEAM GENERATORS (FFFSG)                                11-17

TYPES OF SO  EMISSION STANDARDS USED BY STATE AND
LOCAL AGENCIES FOR EXISTING SULFURIC ACID PLANTS        11-18

TYPES OF S02 EMISSION STANDARDS USED BY STATE AND
LOCAL AGENCIES FOR EXISTING NON-FERROUS (Cu, Pb,
Zn) SMELTERS                                            11-20

UNITS OF AGENCY APPROVED S02 EMISSION STANDARDS         11-21

AGENCIES WITH NO  EMISSION STANDARDS FOR SELECTED
EXISTING SOURCE CATEGORIES                    .          11-25

UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO  EMISSION STANDARDS         11-26

PROVISIONS FOR MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
SOURCE OPERATION AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL  (APC)
EQUIPMENT                                               11-30
                                   ii

-------
                       FOREWORD






     This research was performed  for  the Division of



Stationary Source Enforcement  (DSSE),  Knvironnental



Protection Aqency under Task.. Order  No.  40,  F.PA Contract



No. 68-01-4146.  Mr. Howard  Wright, Compliance Monitoring



Branch, Division of Stationary Source  Enforcement was



the I:.:PA. Task .'ianaqer.  ;,   •   •-.....






     Because this document, is/a  product o't"  the efforts



of ir.any individuals,  it  is  impossible  to acknowledge



each person who has contriouted.   However,  special



recoc;nition is 
-------
                       DISCLAIMER






     This report is  issued by the Office of Enforcenent,




Linviroruuental Protection Agency. Copies are available




for a nominal cost from the National Technical Information




.Service, 52W5 Port Royal Road, Sprinqfield, VA.   22161.




The opinions expressed  in  this report  are  those of  the




producing contractor and are not necessarily  those  of




tho i.i.S. hnvironiiiental  Protection Agency.  This report




in p.ot  to be used as an all  inclusive  reference document




tor existing SIP regulations for selected  sources and




oollutants.

-------
                              SECTION I
                            INTRODUCTION

     On October 6, 1975 Federal regulations were promulgated which required
new and modified facilities within certain stationary source categories to
install, operate, and maintain continuous emission monitoring systems.  At
that same time individual states were given a mandate to adopt minimum
emission monitoring requirements for specified existing stationary sources
by incorporating continuous monitoring (CM) provisions within their respec-
tive State Implementation Plans (SIP) by no later than October 6, 1976.
To date some states have yet to respond by inclusion of the necessary moni-
toring requirements within their SIPs.  Of the states which have drafted and
proposed provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources, the CM
regulations have differed substantially in form, applicability, and enforce-
ability.
     The Division of Stationary Source Enforcement (DSSE) has engaged
Engineering-Science (ES) to develop a document that summarizes the subject
state CM regulations which have been proposed throughout the nation.  In
addition to this review of state CM regulations for existing sources, ES
concurrently compiled all of the various state emission standards for opacity,
S02, NOX, and sulfur compounds other than S02 as currently in effect for
existing stationary sources within each state.  Finally, when a state regu-
lation or supplemental guideline document was found to designate specific
source test procedures for determination of compliance, the compliance test
method of that particular state was noted during the regulations review.
     This report is presented in three parts: Volume I, which presents the
overall summary of the state regulations for continuous monitoring and
emissions limitations for existing sources; Volume II, which consists of
summary tabulations, by state, of the particular existing source groups
regulated by an emission standard for opacity, S02> NOX, and other sulfur
compounds; Volume III, which contains the excerpts from each applicable agency
regulation cited pertinent to emission standards, continuous monitoring, and
compliance test methods for existing stationary sources.
                                1-1

-------
BACKGROUND
     Current copies of air pollution control regulations were solicited and
received by ES during the period February-March, 1978 for each of the fifty
state agencies, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands,
and twelve local agencies selected in concert with the Task Manager.
Each agency's regulations were subsequently reviewed to develop a compilation
consisting of (1) emission standards for opacity, SC>2, NOX, and other sulfur
compounds, and of (2) continuous emission monitoring requirements, as applied
by that agency to existing sources. The Addendum to Volume I provides a con-
cise, one-page summary for a given state therein identifying what existing
source groups are subject to emission standards and which of those facilities
are required to conduct continuous monitoring.
     Soon after this project began, it was recognized that identification of
the SIP-approved regulations (i.e., proposed by agency and approved by EPA
for inclusion within;a SIP) could require extensive contacts with both EPA
and state agency personnel.  The initial approach of using EPA's SIP file
for regulation identification had proven cumbersome and time-consuming.
Thus, the regulations herein compiled are those as provided by the particu-
lar agencies.  In some cases parts of those regulations are at a stage of
being only agency-adopted at this time, while in other instances the regula-
tions have not only been adopted but also approved as part of an agency's
SIP.  In either case there is a high degree of confidence that- the regulations,
as received and reviewed, are "current."  Several agency regulations were
suspect from the standpoint that the minimal CM regulations received could
possibly have been expanded but not included within the regulations provided
to ES.  In each case a follow-up contact with those agencies revealed  that
n£ additional CM regulations had been drafted and proposed by the agencies
in question.  Given  the dynamic nature of the regulatory process, it is
recognized that new  and modified regulations are continually being developed,
drafted, proposed and approved.  For that reason the  "current" status  of
some of the regulations cited herein is undoubtedly certain to be short-lived.
 ^ ' Local agencies:  Allegheny  County  (PA),  Bay Area  (CA) APCD, Boston,
    Chicago, Dade  County  (FL),  Denver, Jefferson  County  (KY), Philadelphia,
    Puget Sound  (WA),  St. Louis,  South Coast (CA) AQMD,  Wayne County  (MI).
                                  1-2

-------
                             SECTION II
                  STATE-ADOPTED EMISSION STANDARDS
                   FOR EXISTING STATIONARY SOURCES

     A major area of interest to this project was the identification and
compilation of each agency's emission standards for existing sources for
the following pollutants:
     o  opacity (or visible emissions)
     o  sulfur dioxide (SC>2)
     o  nitrogen oxides  (NOX)
     o  sulfur compounds other than S02 (eg. H2S04 and TRS)
A comprehensive state-by-state listing of each existing source group regu-
lated by emission standards for one or more of the above pollutants is
tabulated in Volume II of this report.  As shown in Volume II, the range of
source categories affected by emission limitations is quite widespread from
"all existing facilities" to "pilot plants".  Within a given state one pollu-
tant may have as many as ten emission standards for ten individual types of
existing facilities while another pollutant may have no emission limitations
for existing sources.  A particular state having extensive emission standards
for a given pollutant may be geographically adjacent to a state having no
emission limitations for that same pollutant.  The variety of existing sources
covered by emission standards, coupled with the different ways of expressing
those standards, is quite broad.
     From this conceptual three-dimensional matrix of states, source cate-
gories, and emission standards, DSSE personnel have identified the following
existing source categories and associated pollutants for which details of
the applicable emission standards are of prime and immediate concern:

                                 OPACITY
               o  Fossil fuel-fired steam generators  (FFFSG)
               o  Portland  cement plants
               o  Catalyst  regenerators of  fluid bed catalytic cracking
                  units  (FBCCU)
               o  Hog fuel-fired boilers
               o  Kraft  recovery furnaces
               o  Basic  oxygen process furnaces (BOPF)
               o  Ferroalloy electric submerged arc furnaces
                                    II-l

-------
                SO
         o  FFFSG                              o  FFFSG
         o  Sulfuric acid                      o  Nitric acid plants
            plants
         o  Smelters
The remainder of this section discusses the types' and extent of emission
standards for each of the pollutant/source category groupings identified
above.
OPACITY
     The structures of most agency regulations for visible emissions are
general in wording but broad in terms of areas of applicability.  Although
most of the agencies have identified at least a few specific source cate-
gories for which particular opacity standards have been written, in almost
all cases an agency's regulations include an emission limitation on visible
emissions which applies to practically everything that might be considered
a stationary source.  The most- commonplace .form of this wide-coverage
opacity standard is the use of the general source grouping termed "all
existing sources".  Other frequently used terminologies assuring wide-
spread applicability of a single opacity standard include "existing equip-
ment", "existing facilities", "stationary sources", "process operations", and
"existing installations."  The end result of this generalized phraseology
for visible emissions standards is obvious.  Although an agency's regulations
on visible emissions may be few in number, the total number of facilities
affected may be quite large whenever the agency has adopted an opacity
standard for "all existing sources."
     This practice of using "all existing sources" in applying emission
standards for pollutants is commonplace, especially so for opacity.  .Although
a preliminary review of a state's .emission standards for opacity may indi-
cate that few specific source categories are actually covered, the presence
of an all-inclusive opacity standard means otherwise.  This fact must always
be considered in attempting to quantify the number of agencies that have an
opacity standard for a particular source group.   To those agencies having
                                II-2

-------
an opacity standard for the source type in question, one must add the agencies
lacking that source-specific standard but having the all-encompassing regula-
tion pertinent to "all existing facilities."

"All Existing Sources"
     Table II-l illustrates the range of visible emission standards employed
by state and local agencies to govern the vast majority of existing sources.
Particularly noteworthy is the fact that the District of Columbia is the only
agency to completely prohibit visible emissions from all stationary sources.
As evidenced by Table II-l, the agencies are rather evenly divided between
an emission limitation for existing sources of 20% opacity (Ringelmann #1)
and a standard of 40% opacity (Ringelmann #2).  The states of Missouri,
Montana, Tennessee, and Vermont actually use both opacity standards for
existing sources, i.e., one set of specified sources must emit no greater
than 20% opacity, while a second group of sources are permitted emissions up
to 40% opacity.  Conspicuous by their absence in Table II-l are the state
agencies of,New Hampshire and New Jersey.  These two states along with the
Boston local agency are the only agencies which do not have some type of
broad-scope opacity standard for existing sources.  The seven agencies
identified by an asterisk in Table II-l are unique because their visible
emission standards for this generalized, non-specific source category are
expressed solely in units of the Ringelmann scale.
     Most of the state and local agencies will allow visible emissions to
exceed their standard for some finite period of time.  As shown in Table
II-2, only nine states and one local have opacity standards for all existing
sources without an exception period.  Of the agencies that do provide for
intermittent excursions above the standard, the usual period allowed for
emissions higher than the standard is between three to five minutes per hour.
A few agencies allow the visible emissions to remain above the standard for
six or eight minutes per hour.  (It is these periods that must be accounted
for in determinations of excess visible emissions.  Opacities exceeding the
standard, but for a time period not greater than the allowable exception, are
not considered as excess visible emissions.)  On one extreme of the allowable
                                  II-3

-------
                                                        TABLE H-1


                          VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES"

                                            i.e.. NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE CATEGORY
      OPACITY
     STANDARD
                                       STATES WHICH USE
                                                                                  LOCALS
                                                                                 WHICH USE
M
I
        0%


       10%


       20%
       30%


       40%
              Maryland, District of Columbia
              Alabama,  Alaska,  California,  Colorado,  Connecticut,  Delaware,
                               '• i^"'                     ^ *   •    i/
              Florida,  Louisiana,  Maryland, Massachusetts ,  Michigan, Minnesota,
                                                             *     . .      ^
              Missouri,-Montana,  Nebraska,  Nevada, New Mexico ,  New York, Ohio,

              Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota,  Tennessee,
                                                          *
              Vermont,  Virginia,  Washington, West Virginia , Puerto Rico

                    ^     ^
              Illinois, Texas

                            /-I/                            v/
              Arizona,  Arkansas,  Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana,'Iowa, Kansas,

              Kentucky, Maine,  Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina,

                                                  *             /
                                                              ,  Ut
       **
North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina , Tennessee

Wisconsin, Wyoming, Virgin Islands


New Hampshire, New Jersey	
                                                                      Jtah, Vermont,
                                                                         Allegheny Co., Bay Area

                                                                         APCD, Denver, Jefferson
                                                                                          *
                                                                         Co., Philadelphia , Puget
                                                                              *
                                                                         Sound , South Coast AQMD
                                                                         Chicago, Wayne Co.

                                                                                  *
                                                                         Dade Co.,  St. Louis
                                                                                            Boston
    **
 Standard written only in units of Ringelmann Scale.
i
 No visible emissions  standard for "All Existing Sources".

-------
                                                      TABLE II-2
i
in
ALLOWABLE EXCEPTIONS TO VISIBLE EMISSION STANDARDS
FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES"
i.e., NON-SPECIFIC SOURCE CATEGORY



MINUTES/HOUR PERMITTED TO EXCEED STANDARD
NONE TWO
(2)
Arizona New Mexico
(2)
Florida Washington
Iowa District of
., Columbia
Kansas
Kentucky
Nebraska
Utah
Virginia
Wyoming
Jefferson Co.







(1) 3 min/30 min
(2) 1 min/30 min
(3) 15 min/8 hr
(4) 4 min/30 min
(5) 3 min/30 min

THREE FOUR
Alabama Louisiana
Alaska Maryland
California Minnesota
Colorado Montana
Delaware North Dakota
Hawaii
Idaho
Michigan
Nevada
New York
Ohio
Oregon
; Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota •':',; r
Allegheny Co.
Bay Area APCD
Dade Co.
Denver
Philadelphia
Puget Sound
South Coast AQMD
FIVE SIX EIGHT
Arkansas Georgia Illinois
(4)
Connecticut Massachusetts Puerto Rico
(4)
Maine Missouri Chicago
North Carolina Vermont
Oklahoma Virgin Islands .
South Carolina St. Louis
Tennessee Wayne Co .
Texas
West Virginia
Wisconsin \
i
i
(
_. . , . ,. . . . ..'.... . - . ..-...-..,.-,
,*>••• > it V :v





-------
exceptions, Mississippi (not shown in Table II-2) permits visible emissions
from all existing sources to exceed the standard for up to 15 minutes per
hour.  On the other hand, Indiana (not shown in Table II-2) permits opaci-
ties above the standard, but only for a period of 15 minutes per day.  This
latter method of expressing the allowable exception points out another
characteristic common to many of the visible emissions standards.  Although
a large percentage of agencies do allow the standard to be exceeded inter-
mittently, many of those same agencies also specify the number of times the
opacity can be higher than the standard.  This restriction is most fre-
quently written to define the total minutes in a day that the standard may
be exceeded.
     The other feature of visible emissions standards that is sometimes
used by those agencies which permit exceptions is the maximum allowable
opacity during an excursion when the standard itself is exceeded.  For the
agencies which prescribe a ceiling on the maximum opacity, that restriction
                 .•   t
ranges from 20% to 40% above the opacity standard.  In the case of Wiscon-
sin, for example, this article means that opacities of up to 80% for five
minutes per hour are allowable.  Conversely, some states which utilize an
exception period to the visible emissions standard do not place an upper
limit on the opacity when the standard is exceeded.  Thus, in the case of
Delaware, for example, the emissions exceeding the 20% standard could tech-
nically be at 100% opacity during three minutes per hour.
     Table II-3 is a tabulation of the salient features of each agency's
visible emissions standard for the "all existing sources" category.  In
addition to the entries for opacity standard, allowable periods of exception,
and maximum opacities during excursion above standard, the last column of
that table cites the specific terminology used by each state or local for its
all-inclusive opacity standard.  As the remainder of this section demon-
strates, because the actual number-of source category-specific standards for
opacity are so few, the existence of this generalized category standard has
wide-reaching effects upon those categories of prime interest to DSSE.
                                 II-6

-------
TABLE II-3
AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS

STATE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota

Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
FOR "ALL

OPACITY
20Z
20Z
40%
Equiv.
n
20%
20%
20Z
20Z
20%
Equiv.
It2
40%
40%
30%
40Z
40%
40%
40%
20%
40%
OZ or
20%
-
20%
20%
20%
40%
Equiv.
;/l or j'2
Equiv.
?! or 42
207.
20%
-
-
20Z
AC-
EXISTING SOURCES," i.e.; NOT SOURCE SPECIFIC *

RINGELMANN . EXCEPTIONS
#1 #1-03 min/hr
>20%, 3 min/hr
n
it2 02-#3, 5 min/hr
3 times/day
>20Z, 3 min/hr
20%-40%, 3 min/hr
#1 <40Z or #2,
5 min/hr
#1 >20%, 3 min/hr
& 15 min/24 hr
« . -
»2- #2-03, 3 min/hr
#2 #2-#3, 3 min/hr
»2 >S2, 3 min/hr
30Z-60Z, 8 min/
hr, 3 times/day)
in >40%, 15 min/day
#2
-
• -
>20%, 4. min/hr
#2 >40% for 5 min/
hr or 15 min/
cont. 3 hrs
0 or ffl <40Zi 4 min/hr
//I . <<)2, 6 min/hr
ill 20%-40%, 3 min/
hr, 3 times/
. day
20%-40%, 4 ain/
hr 4 40%-60%,
4 min/hr
20%-40Z,' 4 min/
. hr
if2 >:>'2, 15 niir./hr
3 times/day
•>'l or i!2 -Jl-42, ttl--:l3,
J2-;?3, for
6 ain/hr
(varies within
state)
.?! or -?2 v'l-?3 or £2-v3,
'-» ain/hr
=?1
>202, 3 ain/hr
-
-
#1 >'/!. 1 ain/30 ain
>20%, 3 min/hr
i>2 >40%, 5 ain/hr, or
20 rain/day

NAME OF
SOURCE. CITED
Stationary Sources
Industrial Processes
All Sources
Existing Equip.
All
Sta. Air Con tan.
Sources
Process Sources 4
All Sources
All Sources
All Sources Not
Otherwise Covered
All Facilities
Existing Sources
Existing Sources
All Other Emission
.Sources
All Sources
All
Processing -of
Materials
Process Operations
All Sources
All Sources
'Existing Installation
Stationary Source
Other than Incin. .
All Sources
Industrial Process
Equipment
Existing Facilities,
N. 0. Regulated
All Sources
All Sources
All Installations i
All Single Sources
All
All
-
-
All Sources
Any Air Contamination
All Sources
     II-7

-------
                                TABLE II-3 (Continued)
                       AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS
FOR "ALL EXISTING SOURCES," i.e., NOT SOURCE SPECIFIC

STATE
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
D. C.
Puerto Rico

OPACITY RINGELMANN
Equiv. #2
n
20% #1
20% #1
40%
20%
20%
#2
20% #1
20% or #1 or #2
40%
30% (5
min ave . )
40% #2
20% or
40%
20%
20%
#1
40% #2
40%
0%
20% #1

EXCEPTIONS
#2-03, 4 min/hr
20%-60%, 3 ain/hr
20%-60%, 5 min/hr
20 min/ day
>40%, 3 min/hr
20%-60%, 3 min/hr
>20%, 3 min/hr
#2-03, 5 min/hr,
or 20 min/day
20%-60%, 3 min/hr
>20% or >40%,
5 min/hr, 20 min/
day
>30%, 5 min/hr
6 hr/10 days
—
>20% or >40%,
6 min/hr;
always <60%
-
>20%, 15 min/
8 hr
#1-03, 5 min/hr
40%-80%, 5 min/
hr, 3 times/day
0-20%, 2 min/hr
12 min/day
20%-60%, 4 min/
30 min

SAME OF
SOURCE CITED
Existing Installations
All Single Sources
All Sources
All Sources
All
All
All Sources
All Sources
All Air Contam. Sources
& "Certain Existing
Sources"
Stationary Flue
All Existing Single
Sources
Installations
All Sources
All Sources
All
All Sources Before
4/1/72
All Existing Sources
All Sources
(>100 TPY)
Stationary Sources
Virgin Islands  Equiv.
                 #2
                           #2
                                       >#2, 6 min/hr
                    All Existing Single
                     Sources
Allegheny Co.   Equiv.
                 #1
Bay Area APCD   Equiv.
Boston
Chicago
 Puget  Sound
 St.  Louis
 South  Coast
  AQt-O)
 Wayne  Co.
                Equiv.
                 #1.5
Dade Co.
Denver           20";
Jefferson  Co.    20%
Philadelphia
                 Equiv.
                  n
                 Equiv.
                  ••'1
                 30 r.
                            •11
                            n
                            #1.5
                                        #l-#3,  3 min/hr     All Sources

                                        >#1,  3  min/hr       All Sources
#1.5-02, 4 min/
 30 ain; #1.5-
 :?3, 4 ain/hr-
 soot blowing.acc.
>v2, 3 ain/hr
>20%, 3*
#l-#3, 3 min/hr

>:•!, 3 aiin/hr
>#2, 6 min/hr
>••'!, 3 ain/hr
>3-Z, 3 min/30 min
                                                            All Sources
All Sources
All Sources
Process Operations
All Sources  (Except
 Incin.)
All Sources
Existing Single Sources
Single Source of
 Emission
All Sources
                                     II-8

-------
Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (FFFSG)
     With the possible exception of incineration, the source category of
FFFSG, or some variant thereof, is the most regulated facility among the
state and local agencies' emission standards for visible emissions.  How-
ever, the exact terminology of "fossil fuel-fired steam generators" is
used infrequently in agency standards for visible emissions from existing
sources.  More commonplace source descriptions consist of the following:
     o  fuel-burning equipment
     o  indirect heating equipment
     o  indirect heat exchangers
     o  combustion units or combustion installations
Florida is the only agency for which a visible emissions standard is
specifically written for existing FFFSG.  However, because in each case
FFFSG is an element within a larger set of sources defined by the above
source category descriptions, visible emissions standards as written for
those more encompassing source categories have been interpreted to apply
specifically to existing FFFSG.
     As shown in Table II-4, only 13 states and three locals have specific
opacity standards applicable to FFFSG.  Of those agency standards the most
predominant opacity limitation is 20%.  As in the case of visible emissions
standards for "All Existing Sources", Kentucky again has one set of "in-
direct heat exchangers" subject to the 20% limitation and a second group
within that same category allowed to emit up to the 40% opacity level.
Recognizing that FFFSG would be included within the larger category of "All
Existing Sources", the states and locals identified in Table II-4 would
have to be combined with those agencies in Table II-l in order to charac-
terize the total number of agencies within which opacity limitations on
FFFSG are applicable.  In doing this exercise, visible emissions from exist-
ing FFFSG are found to be covered by some form of emission standard for all
of the 65 agency regulations reviewed.
     Table II-5 is a tabular listing of the states and locals with visible
emissions standards for existing FFFSG.  In addition to the standards, the
                               II-9

-------
                                                    TABLE II-4
                                    VARIATION IN VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS FOR

                                 EXISTING FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED STEAM GENERATORS (FFFSG)
         OPACITY

        STANDARD
                                      STATES WHICH USE
                                                                    LOCALS WHICH USE
 i
M
O
            0%


           10%


           20%
30%


40%
             Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana,
                          *
             Massachusetts ,  Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New

             York
Arizona, Kansas, Kentucky
                                                                  Bay Area APCD, Jeffer-
                                                                  son County
Boston
                                                                        **
        Standard specified only in units of Ringelmann.


        '//2 on ASTM Smoke Scale.

-------
                                 TABLE  II-5
STATE-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS
FOR
EXISTING FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED STEAM
GENERATORS


STATE
Alaska
Arizona

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida
Indiana




Kansas

Kentucky


Louisiana

Massachusetts

Minnesota

Mississippi

OPACITY RINGELMANN
20%
40%

202 111

20%

20% #1
-




40%

20% &
40%

Equiv. 91
91
111

20%

-

EXCEPTIONS
>20Z, 3 min/hr
>40Z, 10 consec.
sec.
<40Z or n, 5
min/hr
>20Z but <40%,
2 min/hr
01-//2, 2 min/hr
40%-60%, 10 min/
day-fire starting
40Z-60Z, 5 min/
hr, 6 times/day-
soot blowing
-

202-40%, or
40%-60%, 2-6
min/hr
>01, 4 min/hr

<_ 112, 6 min/hr

20%-40%, 4 min/hr
40%-60%, 4 min/hr
Up to #3, 10 min/
NAME OF
SOURCE CITED
Fuel Burning Equip .
Fuel Burning Equip .

Fuel Burning Equip.

Fuel Burning Equip.

FFFSG
All Sources




Indirect Heating
Equip.
Indirect Heat
Exchangers

Combustion Unit

Fossil Fuel Utiliza-
tion Facility
Indirect Heating
Equip.
All Sources
New Hampshire   20%

New Jersey      20%
New York
                20%
Bay Area APCD   Equiv.
                 #1
Boston


Jefferson Co.   202
#1


SI




82
             10  Btu/day-soot
             blowing
            <40%, 2 min/hr
>20Z but <40Z,
 3 min/hr

>//!, 3 min/hr
 .71-03,,6 min/
 day/10  3tu-
 soot blowing

On std. smoke
 scale (ASTM)

202-40%, 10 min/
 60 min, 20%-80%
 depending on
 type, start-up
Steam Generators

Indirect Heat Ex-
 changers

Stationary Combus-
 tion Installations

Heat Transfer
 Operations
                                 Fuel Burning Equip-
                                  ment

                                 Indirect Heat
                                  Exchangers
                                  11-11

-------
allowable periods of exceptions exceeding the standards and the particular
source category terminology used by each state are also indicated.  Although
the states of Indiana and Mississippi have no specific standard for FFFSG,
these agencies do cite particular exceptions in the cases of fire starting
and/or soot blowing.  Because these operations are characteristic of FFFSG,
those two agencies have been included in Table II-5.
Portland Cement Plants
     Of the agencies reviewed, only four states have opacity standards
specifically for existing portland cement plants.  The details of those
particular regulations are shown below.
                             TABLE II-6
              STATE-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS
                 FOR EXISTING PORTLAND CEMENT PLANTS
      STATE        OPACITY       RINGELMANN              EXCEPTIONS
  Arizona          10%/20%           -          kiln/clinker cooler; Phoenix-
                                                Tuscon AQCR only
  Georgia            10%            #1/2
  Minnesota          20%             -          20%-40%, 4 min/30 min
                                                40%-60%, 4 min/hr
  New York           20%            //I          >20%, 3 min/hr
None of the local agencies have particular opacity standards for this source
category.  Other state and local agencies with opacity standards applicable
to portland cement plants consist of those identified previously under "All
Existing Sources."
FBCUU Catalyst Regenerators
     Similar  to the conditions for portland cement plants, only four states
have visible  emissions standards for existing FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
Those states  and their appropriate emission standards are identified in the
following table.
                                  11-12

-------
                             TABLE II-7
             STATE-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS
              FOR EXISTING FBCCU CATALYST REGENERATORS
., STATE
*
Louisiana
Minnesota
New Mexico
Washington
OPACITY RINGELMANN
30%
30%
40%
40%
>30!
>30.'
40%-
>4o:
                                                        EXCEPTIONS
                                                   >30%, 3 min/hr
                                                   >30%, 3 min/hr
                                                   40%-60%, 15 min/day
                                                   >40%, 3 min/hr
 Listed as FCCU Incinerator - Waste Heat Boiler
None of the local agencies have particular opacity standards for this source
category.  Other state and local agencies with opacity standards applicable
to existing FBCCU catalyst regenerators consist of those identified pre-
viously under "All Existing Sources."

Hog Fuel-Fired Boilers
     The situation for existing hog fuel-fired boilers being specifically
identified as such in state/local agency regulations is similar to the
applicability of regulations for FFFSG.  Washington is the only agency with
an opacity standard specifically directed at "hog fuel boilers".  Whereas
Florida was the only agency with an opacity standard specific to FFFSG,
Florida also has a visible, emissions standard for "carbonaceous fuel burn-
ing equipment."  The remainder of state and local emission standards directly
applicable to visible emissions from hog fuel-fired boilers results from
those agency terminologies such as "fuel-burning equipment", "indirect heat
exchangers", etc.  It should be noted that the source categories named in
several agency regulations as "wood waste burners" and "wood residue
burners" are facilities such as teepee or wigwam burners and are associated
with incineration instead of hog fuel-fired boilers.
     Table II-8 is a tabulation of the 12 state and three local agencies
with visible emissions limitations directly applicable to hog fuel-fired
                                  11-13

-------
                            TABLE II-8

        AGENCY-APPROVED VISIBLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS

             FOR EXISTING  HOG FUEL-FIRED  BOILERS
    STATE     OPACITY  RINGELJtAiSN
                                        EXCEPTIONS
                                                              NAME OF
                                                            SOURCE CITED'
Alaska          20%


Arizona         40%


Connecticut     20%


Delaware        20%


Florida         30%


Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Minnesota
40%
20% &
Equiv.
#1
20%
Mississippi



New Hampshire



Sew Jersey      20%

New York        20%
Washington
                20%
Boston


Jefferson Co.    20%
                          //I
                          #1.5
                          //I
                          #2
                          ill
Bay Area APCD    Equiv.     #1
                 #1
                          ;/2
                                      >20%,  3 mic/hr


                                      >40%,  10 cons.
                                       sec.

                                      20%-40%, 5 min/
                                       hr

                                      20%-40%, 2 min/
                                       hr

                                      30%-40%, 2 min/
                                       hr

                                      40%-60%, 10 min/
                                       day-fire starting
                                      40%-60%, 5 min/
                                       hr,  6 times/day-
                                       soot  blowing
                                      20%-40%,  or 40%-
                                       60%,  2-6 min/hr
                                      >#1,  4 min/hr
                                      202^40%,  4 min/
                                       hr,  40%-60%,
                                       4 .min/hr

                                      <. #3,  10  min/109
                                       Btu/day-soot
                                       blowing

                                      >#2,  6 min/60
                                       min-soot blow-
                                       ing,  etc.
                                      20%-40%,  3 min/hr
                                      >20%,  15 min/4 hr

                                      >#1, 3 min/hr
                                       #l--?3,-6 min/
                                       day/10  Btu-
                                       soot  blowing

                                      ASTM smoke scale
                                      202-40%,  10 min/
                                       hr,  20%-80%, de-
                                       pending  on type
                                       and  start-up
Fuel Burning Equip-
 ment

Fuel Burning Equip-
 ment

Fuel Burning Equip-
 ment (Solid)

Fuel Burning Equip-
 ment

Carbonaceous Fuel
 Burning Equipment
All Sources
Indirect Heating
 Equipment

Indirect Heat
 Exchangers

Combustion Unit


Indirect Heating
 Equipment


All Sources
Fuel Burning
 Equipment


Indirect Heat
 Exchangers

Stationary Com-
 bustion Installa-
 tions

Hog Fuel Boilers

Heat Transfer
 Operations
                                                         Fuel Burning
                                                          Equipment

                                                         Indirect Heat
                                                          Exchangers
                                11-14

-------
 boilers.  Other state and local agencies with opacity standards that can
 be related to hog fuel-fired boilers consist of those identified previously
 under "All Existing Sources."
 Kraft Recovery Furnaces
      Visible emissions limitations on existing kraft recovery furnaces are
 specifically promulgated as such only by the State of Washington.  The
 emission standard prescribed for that group of existing facilities is 35%
 opacity.  Visible emissions exceeding that standard are allowed for six
 minutes per hour.  Other state and local agencies with opacity standards
 applicable to kraft recovery furnaces consist of those identified pre-
 viously under "All Existing Sources."
 Basic Oxygen Process Furnaces (BOPF)
      None of the state and local agency regulations reviewed contain a
 specific provision related to visible emissions standards for existing BOPF.
 However, existing BOPF visible emissions are subject to regulation when
 operating within a state or local jurisdiction having a visible emissions
 standard previously identified under "All Existing Sources."
Ferroalloy Electric Submerged Arc Furnaces
     There are no state or local agency regulations with specific opacity
provisions for existing ferroalloy production facilities.  However, this
group of existing facilities is still subject to more general opacity stand-
ards of the type for "All Existing Sources" as previously identified.

SULFUR DIOXIDE
     Although not nearly as prevalent as with opacity standards for existing
sources, the practice of using a non-specific source category description for
existing facilities subject to gaseous emission standards is rather common-
place.  Of the different gaseous emission standards, the S02 limitation for
existing sources is most often found to apply to the "All Existing Sources"
grouping.  In addition to the collective phrases such as "existing equipment",
"existing facilities", etc., other terminologies such as "industrial process
                                 11-15

-------
operations" and "manufacturing equipment" are frequently employed as the
subject source group for a generalized SO emission standard applicable to
a. host of industrial activities.
Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators  (FFFSG)
     As shown in Table II-9, state and local agencies use a total of four
different ways to prescribe SC>2 emission standards for existing FFFSG.
It should be reiterated that many of the agencies do not specifically name
existing FFFSG as the affected facility to which the S02 emission limitation
applies.  More often than not, the source grouping subject to the standard is
designated as "fuel burning equipment", "indirect heating equipment", "com-
bustion units", etc., in a manner identical to opacity standards for existing
FFFSG as previously discussed.  Once again, the extrapolation of those
standards to a summary such as Table II-9 is valid since in all cases FFFSG
is an element of the larger, more general source group to which the. standard
is directed.
     Table II-9 clearly demonstrates that an emission standard based upon
FFFSG heat input and an emission standard restricting the amount of sulfur
in the fuel are the most widely used means of specifying S02 emission limita-
tions for this source category.  Of the 65 agencies' regulations reviewed, 36
agencies specify a lb/106Btu standard and 28 agencies define the allowable
fuel sulfur content.  Concentration of S02 emissions in ppm is the method
employed by 11 different agencies, while four agencies designate a maximum
allowable mass emission rate of S02 in Ib/hr.  The total number of agencies
specifying an S02 emission standard in one of these four ways is greater
than the number of agency regulations reviewed because some agencies use
more than one set of units to define the S02 emission standard.  Michigan,
for example, has the S02 emission limitation for existing FFFSG expressed in
terms of lb/106Btu and ppm as well as a specification for the allowable
fuel sulfur content.  On the other hand, the states of Arkansas, Maine and
Rhode Island have no S02 emission standard applicable to existing FFFSG.
Sulfuric Acid Plants
     Table 11-10 shows the two principal types of S02 emission standards for
sulfuric acid plants - ppm S02 and Ib S02/ton acid produced.  The agencies
                                   11-16

-------
                                                  TABLE II-9
                             TYPES OF S02 EMISSION STANDARDS USED BY STATE AND
                  LOCAL AGENCIES FOR EXISTING FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED STEAM GENERATORS (FFFSG)
     Ib S02/106Btu
   FUEL SULFUR CONTENT, wt.% S
     Ib S02/hour
     ppm, as S02
Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kan-
sas, Kentucky, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Mis-
souri, Nebraska, New Mexico,
New York, North Carolina,
North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas,
Vermont, West Virginia, Wis-
consin, Wyoming
California, Connecticut, Georgia,
Hawaii, Idaho, Maryland, Massa-
chusetts,1 Michigan, Missouri,
Montana, New Hampshire,1 New Jer-
sey, New York, Oregon, Utah, Ver-
mont, West Virginia, District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin
Islands
California, Georgia,
Nevada,2 Virginia
Alaska,  Colorado,
          *
Louisiana,  Michi-
gan, New Jersey,
                 *
Texas, Washington
Allegheny County, Dade
County, Jefferson County,
Philadelphia, South Coast
AQMD
Bay Area APCD, Boston, Chicago,
Philadelphia, Puget Sound, St.
Louis, South Coast AQMD, Wayne
County
                         Bay Area APCD,
                                *
                         Denver,  Puget
                         Sound, St. Louis
  Emission standard is hot directly source-related, but is in the form used for "All Existing Sources"
Expressed as Ib S/106Btu                    Agencies With NO Applicable S02 Emission Standard for FFFSG:
2Expressed as Ib S/hour                      o Arkansas     o Maine     o Rhode Island

-------
                                                           TABLE 11-10


                                        TYPES OF S02 EMISSION STANDARDS USED BY STATE AND

                                         LOCAL AGENCIES FOR EXISTING SULFURIC ACID PLANTS
           Ib S02/ton of 100% acid
                                                     ppm, as S02
         MISCELLANEOUS
     Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia,

     Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts,

     Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York,

     North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South

     Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia,

     Wisconsin, Puerto Rico
                                                  *            *          *
                                           Alaska,  California,  Colorado,
                                                              *
                                           Delaware, Illinois,  Louisiana,
                                                    *             *
                                           Maryland,  Mississippi,  Mis-
                                                 *        *l            *
                                           souri,  Nevada,   New Jersey,
                                                        *           *
                                           Pennsylvania,  Tennessee,  Texas,
                                                                *
                                           Virginia, Washington,  Wyoming,
                                                               *2
                                           District of Columbia
Arizona - 10% of S in feed;
        *          *        *3
Indiana,  Missouri,  Nevada,

Texas - Ib S02/hr;

New Mexico - Ib S/100 Ib S in

feed.
00
     Allegheny County, Wayne County
                                                         *         *        *
                                           Bay Area APCD,  Chicago,  Denver,
                                                            *
                                           Jefferson County,  South Coast

                                           AQMD
South Coast AQMD - Ib S02/hr
     1
 Emission standard is not directly source-related,  but is in the form used for "All Existing Sources"


  Expressed in ppm, as S

2 Expressed in volume %, as S02

3 Expressed in Ib/hr, as S

-------
identified by an asterisk are those which do not prescribe the SC>2 emission
standard specifically for sulfuric acid plants.  Those agencies' standards
are directed toward S02 emissions from a larger grouping of source categories
which includes sulfuric acid plants.
     In all, 46 different agencies have S02 emission standards applicable to
sulfuric acid plants.  Of those?46 agencies, 19 states and two locals use
Ib SC>2/ton acid for an emission standard specifically for existing sulfuric
acid plants.  There are six agencies which use ppm S02 as the type of emis-
sion standard specifically for existing sulfuric acid plants.  Virginia is
unique in this summary because it employs both Ib/ton acid and ppm for
sulfuric acid plants.  The remaining 20 agencies either have generalized,
non-specific S02 emission standards or have adopted a different, less fre-
quently used, basis for the S02 emission standard.
Non-Ferrous Smelters
     The apparently large number of agencies using ppm as the units of S02
emission standards for existing non-ferrous smelters parallels the circum-
stances previously discussed for sulfuric acid plants.  Several of the state
and local agencies have generalized, non-specific S02 emission standards in
ppm which include smelters in their scope of applicability.  On the other
hand, as indicated in Table 11-11, the majority of SO^ emission standards
written specifically for existing non-ferrous smelters are expressed in
terms of Ib S02/hr.  Considering only those regulations specifically address-
ing existing non-ferrous smelters, 12 agencies have adopted a Ib/hr type of '
S02 emission standard, but only two agencies employ the ppm approach.  The
complex Idaho emission standard not only uses both Ib/hr and ppm, but also
specifies tons S02/day and tons S02/7-day period.  Other western states
(Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah) express their standards in units of pounds
or tons of sulfur or percent of sulfur in the feed.
     Table 11-12 is a state-by-state tabulation of the units of S02 emission
standards for the three major source categories previously discussed.
                                 11-19

-------
                                                     TABLE 11-11
                           TYPES OF S02 EMISSION STANDARDS USED BY STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES

                                     FOR EXISTING NON-FERROUS  (Cu. Pb. Zn) SMELTERS
               Ib SO2/hour
                                                          ppm, as  S02
                                             	3E	95	3T
                                             Alaska,  California,  Colorado,
                                                             i          *
                                             Idaho  (Pb & Zn),1 Illinois,
                                                  •A          i:           *
                                             Iowa,  Kentucky,  Louisiana,
                                                      *               *
                                             Maryland,  Massachusetts,
                                                      *                  *2
                                             Missouri,  Nevada (Pb & Zn),
                                                        *              *
                                             New Jersey,  Pennsylvania,  Ten-
                                                    *                   *
                                             nessee,  Texas, Washington,
                                                                 A3
                                             District of Columbia
                                                                                          MISCELLANEOUS
i
ho
O
     Connecticut, Georgia,  Idaho  (Pb & Zn),1
             5'C                               *
     Indiana,  Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri,
                                            *i+
     Montana, Nevada  (Cu), Nevada  (Pb & Zn)  ,

     New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia,

     West Virginia, Puerto Rico.
Arizona (Cu) - tons S/day;

Arizona (Pb & Zn)  - 10% of
                     S in feed

New Mexico - Ib S/100 Ib S
             in feed

Utah - tons/mo or % of S in feed,
                                             Allegheny County,* Bay Area APCD,*

                                             Chicago,* Denver,* Jefferson

                                             County,* Wayne County*
j^
  Emission standard is not directly source-related, but is in the form used for "All Existing  Sources"

1 Emission standard is a combination of Ib/hr and ppm; also covers tons/day and tons/7-day period

2 Expressed in ppm, as S

3 Expressed in volume %, as S02

4 Expressed in Ib/hr, as S

-------
TABLE 11-12

-

STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA

ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
IIAWA1 1
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS

KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA

MAINE
MAJtYLANI)
MASSACHUSETTS
MI CHI CAN

MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA



FFFSC
lb/106 Btu
A
ppm
lb/10 Btu

-
Ib/hr and Fuel S
ppm
lb/106 lit u and
Fuel S
lb/106 fltu
lb/106 Btu
Ib/hr*. lb/106
Btu and Fuel S
Fuel S
Fuel S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
(2 hr. avg.)
lb/106 Btu

lb/106 Btu
A
ppm

_.
Fuel S
Fuel S f
(Ib S/10 Btu)
lb/10 Btu. ppm,
and Fuel S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 lltu
,'iud Fuel S
Fuel S
UNITS OP AGENCY APPROVED SO.,

SUI.FURIC
ACID
PLANTS Cu
Ib/ton acid
A A
ppm ppm
10Z of S In feed tons (as
day

A *
ppm ppm
A A
ppm ppm
Ib/ton acid Ib/hr
ppm -
Ib/ton acid
Ib/ton acid Ib/hr

Ib/ton acid
* A
ppm Ppro
Ib/hr* Ib/hr*
Ib/ton acid ppm
(2 hr. avg.)


Ib/ton acid ppm
* A
ppm pnm
ft"" rt
(3 hr. avg.)

* *
ppm ppm
1 h/tnn acid ppni


Jb/ton acid -
*
ppm Ib/hr
* *
nom or Ib/hr _,
_
EMISSION STANDARDS


Pb

A
ppm
S) 	 	 10Z


A
ppm
A
ppo
Ib/hr

"
Ib/hr*




SMELTERS
Zn

A
ppm


A
ppm
A
ppm
Ib/hr

-
Ib/hr*

Ib/hr (1 hr. avg.) & tons/7-day
period OR ppm and tpd
A
ppm
Ib/hr
A
ppm

Ib/hr
(new)
A
ppm
A
ppm

-
A
ppm
A
ppn

-

~
Ib/hr
A
ppm nf


ppm
Ib/hr*
A
ppra

Ib/hr
(new)
A
ppm
ppm

_
A
ppm
A
ppm
_

-
Ib/hr
, *
I 1l /ll 1- •*_

 Ib/hr
                 Ib/hr
                                          Ib/hi

-------
TABLE 11-12  (CONTINUED)



STATE
NEBRASKA


NEVADA

NEW HAMPSHIRE


NEW JERSEY


NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK

NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKI.AHOMA

ORECON

PENNSYLVANIA

RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA

TENNESSEE
TEXAS


UTAH
VLIU1UUT

VIRGINIA


WASH LNCTON
WEST VIRGINIA

WISCONSIN

UYOMINC




FFFSC
lb/106 Btu
(2 hr. avg.)

Ib/hr (as S)

Fuel S
(Ib S/10 Btu)

Fuel S (2 S)
and ppm
D
lb/10 Dtu
lb/106 Btu and
Fuel S
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
(new)
Fuel S
c.
lb/10 Btu

_
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
f.
lb/10 Btu
(1 hr. avg.)
lb/106 Btu
'Hid DDID

Fuel S
lb/106 otu
and Fuel S
Ib/hr

A
pplll
lb/106 Btu
and Fuiil S
lb/106 Btu
(new)
lb/106 lltu

UNITS OF AGENCY /

SULFURIC
ACID
PLANTS
.

A A
Ib/hr and ppm
(as S)
Ib/ton acid

A
ppm



Ib/ton acid

Ib/ton acid
_
Ib/ton acid
Ib/ton acid
(new)
-
A
ppm

_
Ib/ton acid
_
A
ppm
Ib/hr and ppm


~
.

ppm and
Ib/ton acid
A
ppm
Ib/ton acid

Ib/ton acid
(new)
ppm
(2 hr. avg.)
APPROVED SO? EMISSION STANDARDS

SMELTERS
Cu Pb Zn
_

A A
Ib/hr Ib/hr and ppm (as S)
(6 hr.avg.)
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr

A A *
ppm ppm ppm

IK "/TOO Hi ° In fnjarl >
	 ID o/iuu ID o in teeo. ^
- -

- -
_
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr
(new) (new) (new)
- -
A A
ppm ppm ppm
(2 hr. avg.)
_
*
_
A A A
ppm ppm PPnl
•"—"•^—^ (one hour average) f
ppm ppm Ppm
(6 hr avg ) (2 hr avg ) »

•« 	 Tons per month OR % of S fed — •*
_

Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr

A A A
ppm ppm ppm
Ib/hr Ib/hr Ib/hr

- _

-


-------
                                            TABLE 11-12    (CONTINUED)
UNITS OF AGENCY APPROVED SO, EMISSION STANDARDS



AGENCY

DIST. OF COL.
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISLANDS

ALLEGHENY CO.

BAY AREA APCD
BOSTON

CHICAGO
DADE CO.

DENVER

JEFFERSON CO. •
PHILADELPHIA

PUGET SOUND
ST. LOUIS
SOUTH COAST
AQMD

WAYNE CO.



FFFSG

Fuel S
Fuel S
Fuel S

lb/10 Btu

ppm and Fuel S
Fuel S
...
Fuel S
lb/106 Btu
' A
ppm
f.
lb/10 Btu
lb/106 Btu
and Fuel S
ppm and Fuel S
ppm and Fuel S
lb/106 Btu and
Fuel S

Fuel S

SULFURIC
APTH
AUJ.1J
PLANTS



Ib/ton acid
-

Ib/ton acid
*
ppm
-
*
ppm
_
*
ppm
*
ppm
-

-
-
lb/hr and ppm


Ib/ton acid


SMELTERS

Cu Pb
*
tT 1 — . .«. n u A n « t- /«-»•••» m 1

lb/hr lb/hr
-
* *
ppm PPm
* *
ppm ppm
-
A A
ppm ppm
-
* *
ppm ppm
A A
ppm ppm
-

• -
-
- -

* *
ppm ppm

Zn

^

lb/hr
-
A
ppm
A
ppm
-
A
ppm
-
A
ppm
A
ppm
-

-
-
-

A
ppm
Emission standard not directly source-related, but in the form used for "All Existing Sources"

-------
NITROGEN OXIDES
     The lists of state and local agencies that currently have NO  emission
                                                                 X
standards for existing FFFSG and/or existing nitric acid plants are tabulated
in Table 11-13.  As is the case for opacity and SO- emissions from FFFSG,
the toO  emission standards applicable to this source group are usually
      X
applicable to a wider range of "fuel burning equipment."  Of the 16 state
agencies having a NO  emission standard for existing FFFSG, all except one
express their standards in units of Ib NO /10  Btu.  Conversely, two of the
                                         X
three local agencies with NO  emission standards applicable to existing
FFFSG have specified the restriction in terms of ppm of NO .
                                                          X
     Of the 18 states having a NO  emission standard for existing nitric
acid plants, all but two of those states have adopted a standard in units
of Ib NO /ton 100% acid produced.  Texas specifically restricts NO  emis-
        X                                                         X
sions from existing nitric acid plants on a ppm basis.  Massachusetts'
generalized ppm emission standard for NO  from "industrial facilities"
is applicable to existing nitric acid plants.  Nevada is unique in specify-
ing the NO  emission standard in terms of both sets of units, Ib/ton acid
and ppm.
     Table 11-14 is a state-by-state tabulation of the units of NO  emission
                                                                  x
standards for each of the two major source categories previously discussed.
MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
     As previously  illustrated, many of the agencies' visible emission
standards are accompanied by a general exception provision whereby visible
emissions in excess of  the specific limitation are permissible, regardless
of  the particular cause, for a given period of time.  The occurrences of
unavoidable equipment breakdown and of deliberate control equipment shut-
down for maintenance are two specific cases that many agencies recognize
as  reasons for waiving  applicability of emission standards.  Malfunctions,
also referred to as breakdowns or upsets, can occur within the source
                                   11-24

-------
                        TABLE 11-13
     AGENCIES WITH NOy EMISSION STANDARDS FOR SELECTED
                 EXISTING SOURCE CATEGORIES
 FOSSIL FUEL-FIRED STEAM
   GENERATORS (FFFSG)l

    California (Ib/hr)
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    Georgia
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Maryland
    Massachusetts
    Minnesota
    New Mexico
    North Carolina
    Ohio
    Texas
    Vermont
    Wyoming
    District of Columbia

                 *
    Bay Area APCD  (ppm)
    Philadelphia
    South Coast AQMD (ppm)
NITRIC ACID PLANTS2

  Alabama
  Arizona
  Connecticut
  Florida
  Georgia
  Illinois
  Kentucky
  Louisiana
  Maryland
               *
  Massachusetts (ppm)
  Minnesota
  Nevada (Ib/ton and ppm)
  North Carolina
  Ohio
  Tennessee
  Texas (ppm)
  Virginia
  Wyoming

                  *
  Jefferson County  (ppm)
  Philadelphia
  Emission standard not directly source-related,  but in the form used
  for "All Existing Sources"
       of standard are Ib NOX (as N02)/10  Btu,  unless noted otherwise.
2Units of standard are Ib NOX (as N02)/ton of 100% acid, unless noted
 otherwise.
                             11-25

-------
                           TABLE 11-14
          UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO  EMISSION STANDARDS
          	.	x	
    STATE
   FFFSG
NITRIC ACID PLANTS
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA  ^-- •'•

ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT

DELAWARE '

FLORIDA
GEORGIA

HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND

MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA

NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
Ib/hr
Ib (as NOJ
  106 Btu
Ib (as NOJ
  106 Btu
Ib (as NOJ
  106 Btu
lb/10  Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/106 Btu
lb/10  Btu
lb/10  Btu
lb/10  Btu
                             11-26
                            Ib/ton acid
                            Ib/ton acid
                            (2 hr. avg.)
   Ib/ton acid
   Ib/ton acid
   Ib/ton acid
   Ib/ton acid
                            Ib/ton acid
                            Ib/ton acid
   Ib
   ton acid
      *
   ppm
   Ib/ton acid
                            Ib/ton and
                            ppm

-------
                         TABLE 11-14  (CONTINUED)
             UNITS OF AGENCY-APPROVED NO^ EMISSION  STANDARDS
    STATE
  FFFSG
NITRIC ACID PLANTS
NORTH  CAROLINA
NORTH  DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA

OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE  ISLAND
SOUTH  CAROLINA
SOUTH  DAKOTA
TENNESSEE

TEXAS

UTAH
VERMONT

VIRGINIA

WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING

DIST.  OF COL.
PUERTO RICO
VIRGIN ISLANDS
ALLEGHENY CO.
BAY  AREA APCD
BOSTON
CHICAGO
DADE CO.
DENVER
JEFFERSON CO.
PHILADELPHIA

PUGET  SOUND
ST. LOUIS
SOUTH  COAST AQMD
WAYNE  CO.
lb/10° Btu
lb/10  Btu
lb/106 Btu
(new)
lb/10  Btu
(2 hr. avg/)
Ib (as NO )
  106 Btu
lb/10  Btu
lb/10  Btu
ppm
lb/10  Btu
(2 hr. avg.)
 ppm (15  min.  avg.)
   Ib/ton acid
   Ib/ton acid
   Ib/ton acid
   (new)
    Ib/ton  acid
    or ppm
    ppm
                            Ib (as N02)
                             ton acid
   Ib/ton acid
   (2 hr. avg.)
   ppm
   Ib/ton acid
   (2 hr. avg.)
   Emission standard is for non-specific source category, e.g.,
   "All Existing Sources"
                                  11-27

-------
process operation or the associated air pollution control equipment and
subsequently result in excessive emissions.  Similarly, excess emissions
are commonplace when air pollution control equipment is shutdown for
routinely scheduled maintenance while the related source continues to
operate.
     Most of the provisions for malfunctions and scheduled maintenance are
contained within the General Provisions section of an agency's regulations,
or else they are contained within the overall text of a separate regulation
or sub-chapter.  There are a few agencies, however, that have structured
their regulations in such a manner as to include malfunction/maintenance
clauses as part of a regulation specific to a particular source category
(e.g., New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York and West Virginia).  Likewise,
although the preponderance of malfunction/maintenance provisions are non-
specific to any one given pollutant, there are a few agencies (Georgia,
Indiana and Missouri) with malfunction and/or maintenance clauses in a
regulation dealing only-with one particular pollutant.
     A survey of the regulations of the fifty states, two territories and
the District of Columbia revealed that all but eight  of those 53 agencies
have some type of provision dealing with excess emissions during equipment
malfunctions and/or control equipment maintenance.  Of the twelve local
agency regulations reviewed, three  (Boston, Bade County and Wayne County)
lacked any provisions addressing"excess emissions during malfunction and
maintenance.  A majority of the regulations containing specific provisions
of this nature address not only the occurrences of malfunctions in process
and control equipment but also the expectation of control equipment shut-
down for scheduled maintenance.  Nineteen  (19) of the 54 agencies with
some type of exception provision addressed malfunctions, upsets or breakdowns
   Alaska, California, Delaware, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania,
   South Carolina, Vermont; includes California where the regulations are
   administered upon a local or regional basis.
                                  11-28

-------
but have no companion regulation for maintenance of control equipment.
Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island have malfunction/maintenance
exceptions applicable to air pollution control equipment but no similar
regulations for process or source operations.  Finally, many of the state
and local regulations are worded so generally that a distinction between
applicability to process equipment or control equipment cannot be made.
This situation arises whenever the subjects of the exception provision
are such terms as "installations", "facilities", "source", etc.
     Table 11-15 is an alphabetical tabulation, by state and by local
agency, of the salient features of each agency's provisions for malfunctions
and maintenance.  Of the 54 agencies having some form of malfunction or
maintenance stipulation, only three (Georgia, Massachusetts and Missouri)
have no requirement for agency notification of such occurrences.  In the
case of malfunctions, agency notification requirements range from "within
24 hours" from the beginning of the malfunction (e.g., Alabama and Idaho)
to as long as within 10 days after the malfunction began (Kansas).  Certain
states qualify their reporting requirements for malfunctions by excluding
minor breakdowns and brief upsets and require notification only of occur-
rences with more significance such as when a malfunction lasts "longer than
1 hour" (Indiana and Minnesota), or "longer than 4 hours"  (Maryland and
Montana), or "longer than 24 hours" (Tennessee).  Virginia requires notifica-
tion of a malfunction if the period of excessive emissions lasts longer than
1 hour.  Connecticut's provision for shutdown of air pollution control equip-
ment requires agency notification if the equipment is inoperative for more
than 72 hours.  The reporting requirement for advance notification of the
intent to shutdown control equipment for scheduled maintenance contains the
most universal element of the malfunction/maintenance provisions.  Almost
all agencies requiring such notification stipulate the following five items
of information to be reported.
     1.  Specific identification of the facility in question^
     2.  Estimated length of time for equipment to be out of service.
                                  11-29

-------
                                                                                   TABLE 11-15
 I
OJ
o
PROVISIONS FOR MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE



AGKNCY



ALABAMA


ALASKA
AR 1 ZONA


ARKANSAS


CALIFORNIA

COLORADO


CONNECTICUT




DELAWARE
DIST. OK
COLUMBIA



FLORIDA




CEORCIA
HAWAII


1 DAIIO



ILLINOIS


SOURCE OPERATION AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

ADDRESSED TO INCLUDES DETAIL
ACENCY
SOURCE AI'C' MALFUNCTION, SCHEDULED NOTU'l- MUST AL1.OWABLE
OI'KRA- EQUIP- BREAKDOWN, MAINTE- CATION SOURCE PERIOD OF
TION MENT UPSET NANCE REQUIRED SHUT DOWN? EXCESS KMISS.
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No NS
Within
24 hours
No No - -
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No NS2
Reasonable &
necessary
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No NS
Within
24 hours
-1 -1 .1 _1 _1 _1 _1
A A
Yes Yes Yes No Yes No NS
Within 1
day
No Yes Yes Yes If APC No NS
equip, is
Inopera-
tive >72
hours
No No - -
* i i
Yes Yes YesM Yes Yes No^ NS


A A
Yes Yen Yes No Yes No 2 hr/day



A A
Yes Yes Yes No No No NS
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No NS


Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes For APC NS
Within 1 malnt.
day wherever
possible5
Yes Ye.s Yes No Yes Yes6 In perm;l t


(APC) EQUIPMENT

S OF PROVISION

WRITTEN ADDITIONAL TIME
PLAN EXTENSION OF
REQ'D? MALFUNCTION PERIOD
For NS
sched'd Notify when
malnt. corrected
-
Yes NS
Notify when
corrected
For NA
sched'd
malnC .
_1 _1

Report NA
of
remedy
No NA




-

For NA
schcd ' d
ma Int .

Quarter- NS
ly rep't At discretion
may be of agency
reost 'd

No NA
For NS
sclied'd Notify vfhen
maint. corrected
Yes NA
Report of rem-
edy may be
required
Yes NS
in per-
mit




SPECIFIC
TO POLLU-
TANT?
No


-
No


No


_1

No


No




-

N^



No




Smoke
No3


No



No


                                                                                                                                                       COMMENTS
                                                                                                                                               No provisions
                                                                                                                                               Upset  must  be unavoid-
                                                                                                                                               able & not  result  of
                                                                                                                                               negligence
                                                                                                                                               Program of  procedures
                                                                                                                                               to minimize malfunc-
                                                                                                                                               tions, etc.  MUST be
                                                                                                                                               filed.
Definition of upset
states "is not due to
Improper or careless
operation."
May specify conditions
to operation of source
while APC equip, is
i'.iopern tlve.

No provisions
                                                                                                                                               Malfunctions  result-
                                                                                                                                               ing  from poor opera-
                                                                                                                                               tion or poor  maint.
                                                                                                                                               are  prohibited.
                                                                                                                                              Max.  effort  must  be
                                                                                                                                              made  to  do AI'C  equip.
                                                                                                                                              maint. when  source not
                                                                                                                                              operating.
                                                                                                                                              Written  report  may he
                                                                                                                                              required.

-------





AGENCY



INDIANA




IOWA


KANSAS


KENTUCKY



LOUISIANA



MA 1 NE



MARYLAND


MASSACHUSETTS




MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA

PROVISIONS FOK
SOURCE OPERATION

ADDRESSED TO INCLUDES
AGENCY
SOURCE Al'C MALFUNCTION, SCHEDULED NOT1FI-
OI'l'.KA- E(JUI1'- BREAKDOWN, MAINTE- CATION
TION MENT UPSET NANCE REQUIRED
Yea Yes Yea Implied If mal-
function
> 1 hour


Yes Yes Yes No8 Yes
Wltliln 1
day
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Wltliln
10 days
Yes 9 Yea Yes Yes Yes



Yes Yes Yes No Yes


A * ,
Yes Yos Yes No Yes
Within
68 hours
A *
Yes YOH Yes No If mal-
function
> It hr
No Yes Yea Yes No




Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Yes Yes Yes Yes If mal-
TABLE 11-15 (Continued)
MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (APC) EQUIPMENT

DETAILS OF PROVISION

MUST ALLOWADLE WRITTEN ADDITIONAL TIME
SOURCE PERIOD OF PLAN EXTENSION OF
SHUT DOWN? EXCESS EM[SS. REQ'D? MALFUNCTION PERIOD
Yes7 NS Mai- NS
func.
cml ss .
reiluc.
prog 'in
No NS Report NA
of
remedy
No NS For NA
sched'd
malnt .
No NS If re- NA
quested


No NS Report NA
of
remedy

No NS Report NA



No Max. 10 days Yes Not > 10 days
(with plan)

No NS No NA




No NS Yes NS
No NS Details NS






SPECIFIC
TO POLLU-
TANT?
Visible
Emission



No


No


See foot-
notes *^


No10



No



No


Yes
From fos-
sil fuel
utiliza-
tion fac.
No
No







COMMENTS

Malfunction plan re-
quired If emissions
>2000 Ib/hr.


Addresses only emer-
gency maintenance.

Frequency of break-
downs must not he
excessive.
Director must decide
whether excess emlss.
due to ma 1 func. are
deemed violation.
Notification Is not
an automatic exemption


-



-


Provides for "reason-
able" malnt. period:!
or unexpected & un-
avoidable failure of
equipment .
-
Facility with "un-
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
                                               (Startup/   function
                                               shutdown)   >  1  hr
of cause  Notify when cor-
& dura-   rected.
tlon
                 Yes     Ye.s
                 Yes     Yes
                                   Yes
                                   Yes
                                                Yes
                                                             Yes
                                                            No
                                                                       No
                                                                       No
                                                                                    NS
                                                                                    NS
                                                                                                 No
                                                                                                 No
                                                                                                                NA
                                                                                                                NA
                                                                                                                               No
                                                                                                                            Purtlcu-
                                                                                                                            late
reasonable breakdown
frequency" not permit-
ted to operate.
Ex. Dlr.  may specify
time,  amt.,  & duration
for ached, maintenance.

-------
PROVISIONS
FOR MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE

SOURCE OPERATION AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (APC) EQUIPMENT

ADDRESSED TO INCLUDES
AGENCY
AGENCY SOURCE APC MALFUNCTION, SCHEDULED NOTIFl-
OPERA- EQUIP- BREAKDOWN. MAINTE- CATION
TrON HENT UPSET NANCE REQUIRED
MONTANA Yes Yes Yes No Yes
If mal-
function
> 4 hrs
NEBRASKA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


* *
NEVADA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Within
24 hrs.

NFW
K HAMPSH.RE - '" *« * W1-fl
U) hrs.
IsJ
NEW JERSEY No No - - -
NEW MEXICO Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Within
24 hrs.

NEW YORK Yes13 No Yes13 No Yea
NORTH CAROLINA No No - - -
*
NORTH DAKOTA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


OHIO Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes




OKLAHOMA Yi-s Yes Yes Yes Yes


OREGON Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

DETAILS OF PROVISION

MUST ALLOWABLE WRITTEN ADDITIONAL TIME
SOURCE PERIOD OF PLAN EXTENSION OF
SHUT DOWN? EXCESS EMISS. REQ'D? MALFUNCTION PERIOD
No Max. of 10 Yes Yes
days At discretion of
agency .

No NS For NA
8 died .
maint.

No NS For NA
soiled .
malnt .

No Max. 48 No Yes
hrs.12 >48 hours, by
request
•
-
No NS For NA
sclied.
malnt .

No NS No NA
_

No Max. of Yes Yes
10 days Major equipment
failure
No • NS For NS
, sclied. Notify when cor-
•• • malnt. rected.


No NS For NS
sclied. Notify when cor-
malnt. rected.
Yes1'"1.5 Max. 48 hrn For Yes
sclied. At discretion of
	 > 	 ____.__^___

^PFPTFTP * ' '
orr.u i r u. COMMENTS
TO POLLU- umni.nib
TANT?
No Report of remedy may
be required.


No Frequency of break-
downs must not be ex-
cessive.

No Upset must be unavoid-
able and not result of
careless or marginal
operat ion .
No Malfunction provisions
Included within spe-
cific source standards
sections.
No provisions
No Frequency of break-
downs must not indi-
cate careless or mar-
ginal operation.
Yes13 See footnote13
No provisions

No Notify when corrected.


No Board will take "appro-
priate action" If
determines that shut-
down was avoidable, in
duced, or prolonged.
No


No Notify when corrected.
Report of remedy may
                                                                                               malnt.1** director.
PENNSYLVANIA     No      No
be requested.
No provisions

-------
TAHLE 11-15
                (Continued)
(


ADUKKSSKt) TO
Af'i-'NrY
A(r'-NCY SOURCE APC
OPERA- EQUIP-
TION MENT
PUERTO RICO Yes Yea


RHODE ISLAND No Yes


SOUTH CAROLINA No No
SOUTH DAKOTA Yes Yes


TENNESSEE Yes Yes



* *
TEXAS Yes Yes


UTAH Yes Yes



VERMONT No No
VIRGINIA Yes Yes





VIRGIN
ISLANDS Yes Ycs



WASHINGTON Yes Yes



WEST VIRGINIA Yes Yes



PROVISIONS FOR
SOURCE OPERATION

INCLUDES
AGENCY
MALFUNCTION, SCHEDULED NOTIF1-
BREAKDOWN, MA1NTE- CATION
UPSET NANCE REQUIRED
Yes Yes Yes


Yes No Yes


-
Yes Yes Yes


Yea Yes If Mal-
function
> 24 hrs.


Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes .



_
Yes Yes lf period
of excess
cmlss. >1 1




Yes Yes Yes



Yes No Yes



Yes No Yes



MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (APC) EQUIPMENT

DETAILS OF PROVISION

MUST ALLOWABLE WRITTEN ADDITIONAL TIME
SOURCE PERIOD OF PLAN EXTENSION OF
SHUT DOWN? EXCESS EMISS. REQ'D? MALFUNCTION PERIOD
No NS For NS
sched. Notify when cor-
malnc. rected.
No Max. 24 Peel- > 24 hours, NS
hours tlon for
variance
.
No NS No NS
Notify when cor-
rected.
No NS For NS
sched. Notify when cor-
malnt. rected.


No NS For NA
sched .
ma Int.
No NS For cor- NA
rect Ion
of mal-
function
_'
No No19 For cor- If malfunction
rection >30 days, must re-
ir of mal- port semi-monthly
function until corrected. 18



No NS Yes NA



No NS Report of NA
remedy
may he re-
quested.
No 2 days21 Yes Max. 10 days
total21







SPECIFIC
TO POL1.U- COMMENTS
TANT?
No


No


No provisions

No

No Due allowance, sub.).
to Administrative
Hearing, to be made
for excess visibles.

No


No See footnote ''



No provisions
No Have special regula-
tion requiring immedi-
ate shutdown of sour-
ces subject to hazard-
ous pollutant emission
standards.

No Upsets must not be so
frequent as to Indi-
cate careless, margi-
nal or unsafe operat'n
No20



No spe-
cific to
source
categories.

-------
                                                                           TABLE  II-15   (Continued)




AGENCY



WISCONSIN


WYOMING


ALLEGHENY




BAY AREA


BOSTON
CHICAGO


DADE CO.
DENVER


JEFFERSON CO.




PHILADELPHIA
PUGET SOUND


ST. 1,011 IS


SOUTH COAST
AQMD
I'ROVt SIGNS FOR
SOURCE OPERATION

ADDRESSED TO INCLUDES
AGENCY
SOURCE AI'C MALFUNCTION, SCHEDULED NOTIFI-
OI'ERA- EQUIP- BREAKDOWN, MA1NTE- CATION
TION MENT UPSET NANCE REQUIRED
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


Y.:.-, Yes Yes No Yes
Within 24
hours
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes




Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


No No -
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


No No - -
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes




Y<-s Yes Yes Implied Yes
Yes Yes Yes No Yes


Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


Yes Yes* Yes2'1 No Yes
MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (APC) EQUIPMENT

DETAILS OF PROVISION

MUST ALLOWABLE WRITTEN ADDITIONAL TIME
SOURCE PERIOD OF PLAN EXTENSION OF
SHUT DOWN? EXCESS EMISS. REQ'D? MALFUNCTION PERIOD
No MS For NA
sclied .
' nmlnt.
No NS Yes NA


No NS Repo(rt NS
of Notify when cor-
remedy22 rer.ted.


No Max. 48 Report No
hours. of
remedy
_
No NS No NS
Notify when cor-
' rected.
_
No 10 days No No


No 10 days Yes Variance req'd
(must still notify
when corrected.)


No NS No NA
No NS Yes NA
1 f re-
quested
No NS Yes NA
If re-
quested
Yes25 Max. 24 Report Must petition tor
hours. of emergency variance.





SPECIFIC
TO POLLU- COMMENTS
TANTV
No


No



No Report of breakdown
does not prevent pro-
secution for a viola-
tion.
No Frequency of raalfunc.
& ma int. must not be
more than is reasonable
No provision.



No provision:
No Upset must have been
unanticipated and
unpreventable.
No Agency must determine
breakdown was unavoid-
able & all reas. steps
were made to minimize
time & emissions.23
No
No


No Maximum effort to con-
duct nuilnt. during non-
operatn per'ds of srce.
No Excess erniss. are not
exempt from Rule 402
                                                                                               remedy
WAYNE CO.
                 No      No
(nuisance).
No provisions.

-------
                                                                                     TABLE 11-13  (Continued)

                                                               PROVISIONS FOR MALFUNCTIONS AND SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE
                                                             SOURCE OPERATION AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (APC) EQUIPMENT

                                                                                       FOOTNOTES
       NS- -  Not  Specified    NA  -  Not  Applicable
       * '
        Coneral  provision  which implies both types ol equipment.
       'Administered by "local" agencies.
       2Whcro start-up or  shutdown is normal operating condition, a continuing specified period of time may be granted.
       ^Separate provision allowing excess visible emissions whenever breakdown occurs.
       "•Only mention of malfunctions is a  provision that gives Commissioner authority to order source to shutdown until APC maintenance is completed or malfunc-
        tioning  equjpjnenj^ is repaired.
       5Durlng maintenance shutdown of APC equipment, must provide auxiliary control equipment to keep pollutant below harmful level or must reduce production.

       6lln]ess source permit provides for  excess emissions during malfunctions.
       7lf source out of compliance more than 102 of operating time for last 12 months, and If source has no approved malfunction emission reduction plan.

       ".Specific provision for cleaning APC equipment, not required to be shutdown - excess partlculate emissions allowed 6 mln/hr.
       ^Specific clause seating that opacity regulations are not applicable during startup, shutdown, or malfunction; specific clause that standards not applicable
        during emergency caused by unavoidable breakdown (indirect heat exchangers.)
       '"Specific provision  for notification  If  flare-controlled  upset  exceeds  6  hours.

       " Exceptions  to  standard allowed during cleaning  of AfC equipment.
       12 Twenty-four  hours  for  incinerators;  immediate notification  required; must  be  unforeseeable  breakdown;  further  extension  of  time  If  source  accepts consent
^      order with  repair schedule  and compliance  schedule.

Ijj      Specific provisions  for  specific  process upsets.
          o   Visible  emis.'ilons  from  Portland  cement,   o   Smoke emissions from stationary combustion,   o  Sulfur compounds  flared  from petroleum refineries.
       '"' If  malfunction Is  not  corrected within  48 hours.
       '•' If  m.-il fnnct lou occur;;  during Alert,  Warning,  or Emergency  stage of  episode,  or if Director  deems  the excess emissions present  imminent ami substantial
        C'tulan^erinciil  to health,  source must  shutdown immediately,
       ' *M f  APC equipment shutdown  for ma lute-nance  Is  more frequent  than once/90  days,  or if  that  shutdown >48  hours, a written plan may  he  required.
        Special  provision  for  nonferrous  smelters  and excess emissions of SOX.
        Usual, requirement.'; of:   (1)  Agency notification of  malfunction or shutdown for maintenance.
                                 (2)  Written  report  of details for  correcting malfunction.
        Additionally:            (1)  Any gases bypassing a desulfurization unit during periodic  maintenance must  still  be  processed  by  gas cleaning equipment
                                     normally proceeding the desulfurization unit.
                                 (2)  The monthly emission  limitation  of either  3750 tons sulfur/month or  14Z of sulfur  feed (whichever  Is less) may be  exceeded
                                     during malfunctions or  maintenance shutdowns.   However,  the running annual average emission  (average of  12 consecutive months)
                                     may never exceed  the monthly emission limitation  regardless of  the frequency of malfunctions or of planned and unplanned
                                     maintenance.
       lnSee  details  of regulation  lor semi-monthly  reporting  requirements;  must  notify when  corrected.   If malfunction >6 months, must apply for variance.
       "Excess emissions due  to  malfunction  are not  considered  a violation  if  source  has been in  compliance for  90% of the operating time during most  recent  12
        months.
       20ProvlslonH  only applicable  to  regulations  for Kraft pulping  mills,  sulfite pulping mills, and primary  aluminum plants.
       2'Excess emissions allowed  froit. 2-10 days for  hot mix asphalt  plants  and S02 from fuel  burning and  "manufacturing process  source operations";  no specific
        periods of  time for  either  coal preparation/handling or for  incinerators.

       22l*allure to  suhml.t  notices or  reports as retjulred are violations.
        Kor  repetitious malfunctions, written program ro permanently correct is  required.  Agency will determine If corrective actions are  required  when  12 or
        more of same  type of  failure occur wiLhln  one year.
        Must prove  cause was  not operator error,  neglect, or  Improper  operation/maintenance  procedures.
       2l'Must shutdown  at end of  cycle or  within 24  hours, whichever  is sooner.

-------
     3.  Nature and quantity of estimated emissions during the maintenance
         period.
     4.  All steps (off-shift labor, reduced production, alternate control
         device, etc.) taken to minimize the emissions and period of time.
     5.  Reasons why the process operations should not be shutdown con-
         currently with the control equipment.
     None of the agencies reviewed are so strict towards malfunctions and
maintenance that they require immediate shutdown of the source until the
malfunction is corrected or the maintenance is completed.  However, the
various regulations have a wide variation in the tolerance for source
operations during these periods.  Illinois will allow a source to continue
operation with a malfunction when that condition is so stipulated in the
source's operating permit.  Similarly, if a source has an approved mal-
function emission reduction plan, Indiana allows that operation to continue
during a malfunction if that source has been in compliance for'90% or more
of the operating time during the most recent twelve-month period.   Oregon
dictates that an operation must be shutdown if the associated malfunction
is not corrected within 48 hours.  Idaho simply states that sources must
shutdown whenever possible for periods of control equipment maintenance.
Connecticut reserves the option of specifying source operating conditions
during periods of control equipment imperativeness.  Of the local agency
regulations reviewed, the Bay Area APCD .allows ,a .maximum of 48 hours for a..
malfunction to be corrected.  South Coast AQMD specifies that malfunctions
must be followed by shutdown of the operation at the end of a cycle or
within 24 hours, whichever is sooner.
     As shown in Table 11-15 some agencies specify the maximum allowable
period of excess emissions due to malfunctions.  This time period for
malfunction-related excess emissions ranges from 24 hours to 30 days.
Florida has a unique malfunction provision which permits related excess
   Provision is specific to visible emissions.
                                  11-36

-------
emissions for 2 hours/day.  Virginia has a malfunction provision covering
the first 30 days of such an occurrence after which additional reporting
requirements are invoked for further extensions of malfunction periods.
Similarly, other agencies, as indicated in Table 11-15, have provisions
requiring sources to petition for a variance if malfunctions extend beyond
the specified permissible time period.  Some regulations simply state that
source operation may be continued at the discretion of the agency in question.
On the other hand, some agencies (e.g., Maryland) have no regulatory
mechanism for extending periods of source operation during equipment mal-
function past the allotted time frame for correction.
     Utah has a unique provision to deal with excess emissions of sulfur
oxides from non-ferrous smelters during periods of malfunction or scheduled
maintenance.  In addition to the routine requirements for agency notification
and reporting of corrective actions, Utah requires all other smelter control
equipment to be in use when a desulfurization unit is by-passed for periodic
maintenance.  Furthermore, during malfunctions or maintenance periods the
smelter's monthly SO  emission limitation may .be exceeded, but the running
                    X
annual average SO  emission may never exceed the monthly emission standard
                 A
regardless of the frequency of malfunctions or maintenance.
     For clarification and additional information beyond the comments and
footnotes of Table 11-15, the full text of each agency's malfunction and
maintenance provision has been included in Appendix D of Volume III.
                                  11-37

-------
                               SECTION III
            STATE-ADOPTED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                    FOR EXISTING STATIONARY SOURCES
     In order to provide some guidance to the individual states for imple-
menting continuous monitoring regulations for existing sources, Appendix P
of 40 CFR 51 details specific minimum requirements for continuous monitor-
ing that each SIP must incorporate.  Four stationary source categories have
been identified as ones with existing facilities, with appropriate excep-
tions, which must conduct continuous emission monitoring.  Those four
source categories are the following:
     1.  Fossil fuel-fired steam generators (FFFSG)
     2.  Fluid bed catalytic cracking unit (FBCCU) catalyst regenerators
     3.  Sulfuric acid plants
     4.  Nitric acid plants
Appendix P of Part 51 has particular criteria for establishing which
facilities within each source category must implement continuous monitoring.
Specific details of installation, operation and maintenance, data reduction,
and emission reporting are delineated within Appendix P.  The continuous
monitoring systems' performance specifications of Appendix B of 40 CFR 60
are incorporated by reference in Appendix B as well.  A comprehensive
review and analysis of the Appendix P requirements are not within the scope
of work of this project.  The particular personnel within EPA to whom this
report is directed currently possess a sound knowledge of and familiarity
with the Appendix P contents.  The complete texts of both Appendix P of
Part 51 and Appendix B of Part 60 have been included in Volume III of this
document in order to facilitate reference to those basic regulations.
     A review of the continuous monitoring provisions of the individual
states resulted in the following scheme of classifying the extent to which
a state has adopted the minimum monitoring requirements set forth in Part 51.
     1. CLASS I - Those states that have incorporated detailed continuous
        monitoring regulations which are usually structured, both in form and
                                  III-l

-------
        content, much like the Appendix P and Appendix B details.
        o  CLASS LA - Those states that would be considered CLASS I
           states with the exception that monitoring provisions for one
           or more of the four source categories identified by Part 51
           have not been promulgated.
     2.   CLASS II - Those states that have specific continuous monitoring
         details in their regulations, but fall short of incorporating
         the myriad specifications of Appendix P and/or Appendix B.
     3.   CLASS III - Those states that have only the most general of
         continuous monitoring regulations, usually consisting of nothing
         more than identification of the source required to monitor and
         of the specific pollutant to be measured.
     4.   CLASS IV - Those states that have no continuous monitoring
         provisions required of existing sources except for, in some
         instances, the nebulous "catch-all" section of enabling legis-
         lation that allows that certain sources may be required to conduct
         continuous monitoring as directed.
     The remainder of this section is a state-by-state synopsis of the extent
to which each agency has complied with the minimum emission monitoring
requirements as directed by Part 51.  In order to avoid excessive repetition
throughout this analysis, the specific areas that are highlighted are those
in which an agency's regulations differ from the Appendix P regulations.
Furthermore, it is beyond the scope of this survey to determine the particu-
lar reasons why a given state regulation deviates from the Part 51 require-
ments.  Therefore, if a state is identified as a CLASS I or IA state, but
only a few items of continuous monitoring are addressed, the reader must
recognize that the areas not discussed are essentially identical to the
Part 51 Federal regulations.
                                   III-2

-------
ALABAMA  (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows Part 51, Appendix P, and Part 60, Appendix B.
     o  No CM regulations for existing nitric acid plants or for existing
        FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
     o  All affected facilities required to submit detailed plan for comply-
        ing with CM provisions.
     o  Director has authority to specify data averaging times and sampling
        intervals different from those of Appendix B performance specifi-
        cations.
     o  Any monitoring system malfunction lasting more than 48 hours must
        be reported in writing. •
ALASKA  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources as
        identified in Appendix P, Part 51.
     o  General regulation for continuous emission recording devices as
        specified by the Department for sulfite pulp mills and kraft pulp
        mills.

ARIZONA (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources as
       • identified in Part 51.
     o  General CM requirements for monitoring SC>2 emissions from the sul-
        fur removal equipment serving copper smelters:
        (1) Continuously monitor and record SC>2 emissions with j-20% accuracy
            and confidence level of 95%.
        (2) Operate and calibrate monitoring equipment in accordance with
            manufacturer's specifications; calibration must be done at
            least once per day.
                                  III-3

-------
ARKANSAS (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
CALIFORNIA (CLASS II)
     o  Has most of the source categories/pollutants required to be
        continuously monitored in Appendix P.
        (1)  steam generators - opacity, NO , CO- or 0~
             (>250 x 106 Btu/hour)'
        (2)  nitric acid plants - NO'
                                    x
        (3)  sulfuric acid plants - SO-
     o  Does not have the details for FFFSG regarding exceptions on the basis
        of size, type of fuel, capacity factor, and use of particulate control
        equipment as does Part 51.
     o  Does not have the details for exemptions based upon : (1) purchase date
        of monitor (grandfather clause) and (2) scheduled date for source
        retirement.
     o  Does not have performance specification details of Appendix B, Part 60.
     o  Performance criterion established for monitoring equipment is + 20%
        with confidence levels of 95%.
     o  Does not have Part 51 requirements pertinent to: (1) minimum data
        requirements and excess emission reports and (2) data reduction pro-
        cedures.
     o  Does  require data retention for 2 years.
     o  Does prescribe additional CM for: (1) sulfur recovery plants - SO-
        and (2) refinery boilers, new cokers, and existing boilers >10,000
        bbl/day - CO.
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of opacity from existing
        FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
COLORADO  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
                                    III-4

-------
CONNECTICUT (CLASS III)
     o  Only general opacity monitoring requirements for:
        (1)  Coal-burning equipment
        (2)  Liquid or solid fuel-burning equipment >5 x 10  Btu/hour
        (3)  Incinerators >2,000 Ib (input)/hour
        (4)  Process source with particulate emissions >5 Ib/hour
        (5)  Fuel-burning equipment using No. 6 residual oil
     o  Exceptions to opacity monitoring requirements:
        (1)  Emergency standby fuel burning equipment operating _<_ 168
             hours/year
        (2)  Gas turbines with smoke control apparatus capable of keeping
             visibles _< 20% opacity
     o  Commissioner publishes performance standards "from time-to-time"
        for determining acceptable opacity monitors.
     o  Must retain monitoring data for 3 years.
     o  Except for necessary maintenance, the monitor cannot be shut down
        while source is operating; CM shutdown >72 hours requires agency
        notification.
     o  Grandfather clause exempts any opacity monitors installed before
        9/1/74 until 1/1/85.
     o  Coal-burning equipment <250 x 10  Btu/hour do not have to submit
        quarterly report.
DELAWARE (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows Part 51, Appendix P, and Part 60, Appendix B.
     o  No CM regulations for existing nitric acid plants.
     o  Opacity monitoring required of waste heat boilers if more than
        250 x 10  Btu/hour heat input is provided by auxiliary fuel.
     o  Performance certification testing must be repeated after repairs
        or adjustments to a monitoring system (option of Paragraph 4.4,
        Appendix P).
                                  III-5

-------
     o  F and F  factors for fuel burning equipment are subject to approval
        of the Secretary, and are not merely those of 40 CFR 60.45(f) as
        referenced by Appendix P.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (CLASS IV)
     o  Nothing more than enabling legislation pertinent to sources emitting
        >100 tons/year "of any air pollutant"; details are administered by
        the Commissioner.
FLORIDA (CLASS III)
     o  General provision for S0« emission monitoring by existing FFFSG in
        a manner, frequency, and location subject to approval by the Depart-
        ment.
GEORGIA (CLASS III)
     o  Sulfuric acid plants must be "equipped with a continuous S0«
        monitor and recorder  .  . .".
     o  Nitric acid plants must be "equipped with a continuous NO  monitor
                                                                 X
        and  recorder  .  .  .".
HAWAII  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
IDAHO  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources  as
        identified in Appendix  P, Part  51.
     o  Specific CM requirements for TRS  from kraft pulp mills:
         (1)  capable of  determining compliance with TRS emission standards
         (2)  cycling  time not to exceed 30 minutes
         (3)  minimum affected facilities
                 recovery furnace stacks
                 lime kiln stacks
         (4)  source must submit detailed  compliance program
                                  III-6

-------
        (5)  data to be reported monthly includes:
             -  daily average emission of TRS gases for each source monitored
                (ppm, dry basis)
             -  number of hours per day that recovery stack TRS emissions
                exceed standard
 V          ~  daily maximum TRS concentration in recovery furnace stack
             -  monthly average emissions of TRS from each source in kraft
                cycle that is monitored (Ib S/equiv. air-dried ton of pulp
                processed)
             -  average daily kraft pulp production
     o  Specific CM requirements for SO  from combined zinc/lead smelters
        emitting >50 tons SO /year.
        (1)  Maintained,  calibrated and operated in accordance with manufactur-
             er's  specifications
        (2)  Calibration  and/or maintenance records must be kept;  instrument
             readings before and after any calibration and/or maintenance must
             be clearly shown.
        (3)  Data  must be retained for at least 2 years.
        (4)  Calculate one-hour average SO  emission rates each day/ submit
             calculation  to the Director monthly.
        (5)  CM system shall be used for determining compliance with S02
             emission standard.
        (6)  Specifies procedure for calculating SO- emission rate.
ILLINOIS (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
INDIANA (CLASS I)
     o  Incorporates all  provisions of Appendix P, Part 51.
     o  Requires specific notification of Board for monitoring system
        malfunction exceeding one hour.
     o  Specifies  6-minute averaging period for opacity and 3-hour periods
        for gases.
                                 III-7

-------
IOWA (CLASS II)
     o  Follows details of Part 51, Appendix P, and Part 60, Appendix A,
        only for the following:
        (1)  opacity from coal-fired or coal-gas-fired steam generating units
        (2)  SO  from sulfuric acid plants
     o  No CM regulations for existing nitric acid plants or for existing
        FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
     o  9uarterly excess emission reports must be filed on forms provided
        by the Executive Director.
     o  Written notice of a continuous monitor performance test must be given
        at least 15 days before the evaluation; written report of test results
        must be submitted.
     o  Does not address the following topics covered by Paragraph 3.0
        of Appendix P, Part 51:
        (1)  Calibration gases for required S02 monitoring systems.
        (2)  Cycling times of required opacity and SO- monitoring systems.
        (3)  Monitor locations for representative measurements.
        (4)  Minimum requirements for zero and span checks and adjustments.
        (5)  Instrument span setting.
     o  Minimum data requirements, methods of data reduction, and methods
        of data averaging are not specified.
     o  Affected steam generators scheduled for retirement within 5 years
        are exempted from the  continuous monitoring requirement; there is
        no comparable exemption  for sulfuric acid plants scheduled for
        retirement within 5 years.
     o  Existing steam generator  with projected annual average capacity
        factor  <30% is exempt  from CM.
KANSAS  (CLASS  IV)
      o  No provisions  for continuous  monitoring  of existing sources.
                                  III-8

-------
KENTUCKY (CLASS II)
     o  Follows most of the Part 51 areas of applicability, but not nearly
        as detailed as Appendix B.
     o  No CM regulations for FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
     o  No performance specifications of Appendix P.
     o  Terminology used is "indirect heat exchangers" in lieu of FFFSG.
     o  Has provision for fuel sulfur monitoring in place of SO- emission
        monitoring.
     o  Generalized performance criteria for any monitoring system.
        (1)  + 20% with 95% confidence level (sic).
        (2)  Calibrated as prescribed by manufacturer.
        (3)  "Zero adjustment and calibration procedures" as prescribed by
             the manufacturer at least once daily,  or more frequently if
             specified by manufacturer.
     o  Data reduction and retention.
        (1)  Indirect heat exchangers and sulfuric acid plants must reduce
             "appropriate" measurements to units of the applicable standard
             daily and must summarize monthly; data and summaries must be
             retained for 2 years.
        (2)  Nitric acid plants have no provisions for data reduction or
             retention.
     o  No provisions for reporting of excess emissions.
     o  No requirement for CCL or CL monitoring at indirect heat exchanger
        monitoring SO .
     o  No provisions for conversion of S0? emission measurements to units
                                     g    ^
        of applicable standard  (lb/10  Btu).
     o  In lieu of continuous monitoring affected indirect heat exchangers
        may apply to conduct periodic source sampling (minimum of once per
        calendar quarter).
LOUISIANA  (CLASS I)
     o  Incorporates by reference all minimum emission monitoring require-
        ments of Appendix P, Part 51.
                                 III-9

-------
MAINE (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
MARYLAND (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
MASSACHUSETTS  (CLASS III)
     o  General opacity monitoring requirement for selected fossil  fuel
        utilization facilities.
        (1)  burning oil or solid fuel      .
        (2)  >  10  x 106 Btu/hour
     o  "Smoke  density sensing instrument  and recorder" subject  to  approval
        by Department.           '  - -                     ...
     o.  Data must be retained for one (1) year.
     o  Must equip opacity monitor with audible alarm signal set at //I
        Ringelmann.
MICHIGAN (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
MINNESOTA (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows Part 51, Appendix P, and Part 60, Appendix-'B.
     o  No CM regulations for existing FFFSG.                            ."
     o  Goes beyond the basic requirements for existing sources set forth in
        Part 51 by providing for several specific details of continuous
        monitoring found in Part 60 for NSPS.
MISSISSIPPI (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
MISSOURI (CLASS IA - ST. LOUIS METROPOLITAN AND OUTSTATE MISSOURI AREAS ONLY)
     o  Follows details of Appendix P, Part 51,-and Appendix B, Part 60,
        only for opacity from:
        (1)  coal-fired steam generating units
        (2)  FBCCU catalyst regenerators
                                  Hl-10

-------
     o  Requires opacity monitoring of portland cement calcining kiln opera-
        tions in accordance with same procedures above.
     o  No CM regulations for SO- (and CO  or 0 ) from coal-fired steam
        generating units.
     o  No CM regulations for sulfuric acid plants or for nitric acid plants.
     o  Specifies 6-minute averaging period for opacity (as done in Part 60).
     o  Quarterly excess emission reports are due within 30 days from the
        end of a calendar quarter.
     o  Coal-fired steam generating units and portland cement calcining kilns
        scheduled for retirement within 5 years are exempted from continuous
        monitoring requirement; there is no comparable exemption for FBCCU
        catalyst regenerators scheduled for retirement within 5 years.
     o  In addition to the normal exceptions to CM requirements in Part 51
        for steam generators (i.e., minimum size, capacity factor, etc.),
        coal-fired boilers using flue gas desulfurization are exempted from
        the opacity monitoring requirement.
     o  Portland cement kilns having baghouses that discharge from multiple
        stacks or vents are exempt from the opacity monitoring requirement.
     o  Affected facilities must submit a compliance program for implement-
        ing CM.
     o  Affected facilities are only given 12 months to comply.
MONTANA (CLASS IV)                                  "
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources as
        identified in Part 51.
     o  Specific CM requirements for TRS from kraft pulp mills.
        (1)  Capable of determining compliance with TRS emission standards.
        (2)  Cycling time not to exceed 30 minutes.
        (3)  Minimum affected facilities:
                recovery furnace stacks
                lime kiln stacks
                                 III-ll

-------
        (4)   Source must submit detailed compliance program.
        (5)   Data to be reported monthly includes:
             -  daily average emission of TRS gases for each source monitored
                (Ib. S/103 Ib. of black liquor fired)
             -  number of hours per day that recovery furnace emissions
                > 17.5 ppm (dry)
             -  daily maximum TRS concentration in recovery furnace stack
             -  monthly average of emissions of TRS gases
                (a)  Ib. S/1000 Ib. black liquor fired - kraft recovery furnace.
                (b)  Ib. S/hour - other sources
             -  average daily kraft pulp production
             -  average daily black liquor burning rate
NEBRASKA (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows the content of Part 51, Appendix P, for FFFSG.
     o  No CM provisions for sulfuric acid plants, nitric acid plants, or
        FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
NEVADA (CLASS I)
     o  Incorporates by reference all of the minimum emission monitoring
        requirements of Appendix P, Part 51, as well as adopting the perform-
        ance specifications of Appendix B, Part 60.
NEW HAMPSHIRE (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
NEW JERSEY (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
NEW MEXICO (CLASS II)
     o  Only provides for S0« monitoring from existing coal-burning equipment.
     o  No references to either Part 51, Appendix P, or Part 60, Appendix B.
     o  Calibrate according to manufacturer's instructions at least once
        daily, or more frequently if recommended by manufacturer.
           Reference method must be consistent with specified manual sampling
           method for SO  .
                                 111-12

-------
     o  Quarterly reports, due within 35 days after end of calendar quarter,
        must contain:
        (1)  hourly averages of SCL concentrations in ppm
        (2)  hourly averages of % excess CL
        (3)  rate of heat input (determined at least once per day)
        (4)  % sulfur and higher heating value of coal being utilized
             (determined at least once per day)
NEW YORK (CLASS II)
     o  Stationary combustion installations > 250 x 10  Btu/hour (except
        gas-fired units) must monitor opacity.
        (1)  No performance specifications; instrument must be approved by
             Commission and installed/operated per manufacturer's instruc-
             tions.
        (2)  Must also monitor NO  if permit filed after 8/11/72; no mention
                                 A,
             •
             of concurrent C0« or 0? monitoring.
        (3)  Must determine average rate of each fuel burned daily.
        (4)  Must determine gross heating value and ash content  (ASTM or
             equivalent) at least once per week.
        (5)  Data and records must be retained for 3 years.
        (6)  No provisions for data reduction.
        (7)  No provisions for excess emissions reporting.
     o  Portland cement kilns and clinker coolers must monitor opacity after
        1980.
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sulfuric or
        nitric acid plants or of existing FBCCU catalyst regenerators.
NORTH CAROLINA (CLASS I)
     o  Adopts all sections of Appendix P, Part 51, and Appendix B, Part 60.
     o  Specifies six-minute averaging period for opacity monitoring data
        instead of the one-minute guideline of Appendix P.
     o  Opacity monitoring required of steam generators burning wood or wood
        with fossil fuels if heat inpul
        average capacity factor > 30%.
with fossil fuels if heat input > 250 x 10  Btu/hour and if annual
                                 111-13

-------
        (1)  These opacity regulations are not as detailed as Appendix P.
        (2)  These opacity regulations do not reference Appendix B, Perform-
             ance Specification 1, but instead require:
             -  "manufacturer's recommended zero adjustment and calibration
                procedures"
             -  excess emissions must be summarized and reported quarterly
                data must be retained for one (1) year
     o  Coal-burning or residual oil-burning installations exceeding the
        Part 51 minimum size and capacity specifications, but exempt from
        S0? monitoring by some qualifying exception of Part 51, must
        nevertheless monitor SCL or fuel sulfur.  For those sources electing
        to monitor SO- emissions, quarterly reports of the following are
        required:
        (1)  emission rate, in units of standard
        (2)  maximum instantaneous rate
        (3)  total S0? emissions which are excess emissions
        There is no provision requiring those sources to concurrently monitor
        CO,, or 09.  Monitoring data must be retained for one  (1) year.
     o  Facilities within the previous two source categories are exempt from
        CM if source operates <30 days/year.
     o  All affected facilities must submit a compliance plan for implementing
        a CM program.
     o  Permit conditions for any source must include any applicable monitoring
        provisions.
     o  Five-year grandfather clause for monitors purchased before 9/1/74
        applies only if that monitor had been approved previously under
        Regulation #8 in effect prior to this regulation.
NORTH DAKOTA (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
OHIO (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
                                 111-14

-------
OKLAHOMA (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows Part 51, Appendix P,  and Part 60,  Appendix B.
     o  No CM regulations for existing nitric acid plants (however, there are
        specific data reduction procedures to be employed at nitric acid
        plants not covered by NSPS).
     o  Sulfuric acid plants being utilized as a means of preventing emissions
        of S0_ or other sulfur compounds are exempt from continuous monitoring
        of S02.
OREGON (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources as
        identified in Appendix P, Part 51.
     o  General requirement for continual monitoring of opacity from recovery
        furnace.
     o  Specific provisions for TRS monitoring and subsequent data reporting
        for:
        (1) kraft pulp mills
        (2)  sulfite pulp mills
PENNSYLVANIA (CLASS IV)
     o  Little more than enabling legislation for continuous monitoring in
        v/hich the "device" used for continuous measurement of air contaminants
        must be approved by the Department.
PUERTO RICO (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
RHODE ISLAND (CLASS III)
     o  General regulation only for opacity monitoring by:
        (1)  steam or hot water generators burning No. 6 residual oil or
             solid fuel
        (2)  steam or hot water generators burning all other liquid fuels
             > 5 x 10  Btu/hour input
     o  Requires alarm "calibrated to sound" at 20% opacity.
                                HI-15

-------
 SOUTH CAROLINA (CLASS IA)
      o  Adopts all of the Appendix P, Part 51,  and Appendix B,  Part 60,
         requirements for opacity monitoring of  FFFSG;  even specifies instru-
         ment span of approximately 80% opacity.
      o  No gaseous emission monitoring requirements for FFFSG.
      o  No monitoring requirements for sulfuric or nitric acid  plants,
         FBCCU catalyst regenerators,  or any other source categories.
SOUTH DAKOTA (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
TENNESSEE (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows details of Appendix P, Part 51 for:
        (1)  FFFSG
        (2)  sulfuric acid plants
        (3)  FBCCU catalyst regenerators
     o  No CM provisions for NO  from existing nitric acid plants.
                               X
     o  Each emission point of >100,OUO acfm must install opacity monitor
        in accordance with Federal Register; required data retention for
        minimum of 1 year.
TEXAS  (CLASS III)
     o  General opacity monitoring requirement  for any stationary flue with
        more than 100,000 acfm and greater than 15% opacity averaged over
        a 5-minute period.  Records must be retained.
     o  General SO^ monitoring requirement for  primary nonferrous smelters
        (Cu, Pb, Zn) and any sulfuric acid plant used for SO™ control on
        such smelters.  Specifies a cycling time of at least one measurement
        every  15-minute period.
UTAH  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
                                  111-16

-------
VERMONT (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring of existing sources.
VIRGINIA (CLASS IA)
     o  Follows Part 51, Appendix P, and Part 60, Appendix B.
     o  Goes beyond the basic requirements for existing sources set forth
        in Part 51 by providing for several specific details of  continuous
        monitoring found in Part 60 for NSPS.  Examples of these adoptions
        of NSPS-related regulations to specific existing facilities include:
        (1)  Opacity monitors for fossil fuel-fired steam generators must be
             spanned at 80, 90 or 100 percent opacity [ref: 40 CFR 60.45(c)(3)],
        (2)  SO- monitors for sulfuric acid plants must be spanned at 1,000
             ppm; NO  monitors for nitric acid plants must be spanned at
                    X
             500 ppm; and opacity monitors for catalyst regenerators must
             be spanned at 60, 70, or 80 percent opacity.  [ref: 40 CFR 60,
             sections 60.84(a), 60.73(a), and 60.105(a)(1), respectively].
        (3)  Within 30 days of getting the continuous monitoring system
             installed and operational, the source must conduct continuous
             monitoring system performance evaluations [based upon schedule
             established for NSPS in 40 CFR 60.8].
     o  No CM provision for SO- monitoring of FFFSG.
     o  S0? emission standard indirectly tied to fuel sulfur limitation.
     o  Requires NO  monitoring at nitric acid plants but does not require
                   X
        NO  monitoring at FFFSG.
          X
     o  Cycling time for opacity monitors with averaging function specified
        as 6 minutes; no specification for cycling time of opacity monitors
        not equipped with averaging function.
VIRGIN ISLANDS (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
                                 111-17

-------
WASHINGTON (CLASS IA)
     o  Incorporates by reference the minimum emission monitoring requirements
        of Appendix P, Part 51, and the performance specifications of Appendix
        B, Part 60, for:
        (1)  FFFSG
        (2)  Sulfuric acid plants
        (3)  FBCCU catalyst regenerators
     o  No CM provisions for existing nitric acid plants.
     o  General continuous opacity monitoring requirement for wood residue
        fuel-fired steam generators > 100 x 10  Btu/hour.
        (1)  no specifics of Appendix P or Appendix B
        (2)  opacity monitoring equipment subject to approval by the Depart-
             ment
     o  Specific provisions for TRS monitoring and subsequent data reporting
        for:
        (1)  kraft pulp mills
        (2)  sulfite pulp mills
     o  General continuous opacity monitoring requirement for:
        (1)  kraft pulp mills
                recovery furnace
                lime kiln
                other source
        (2)  sulfite pulp mills
                recovery system
                acid plant
                other source
WEST VIRGINIA  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
     o  Has a very general provision that "stack gas monitoring devices"
        may be required by the Director for SO- compliance determination  for:
                                  111-18

-------
        (1)  fuel burning equipment
        (2)  sulfuric acid plants
        (3)  sulfur recovery plants
        (4)  primary non-ferrous smelters
        (5)  sulfite pulp mills
WISCONSIN  (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring  at existing  sources.
WYOMING (CLASS  IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring  of existing  sources.
EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING PROVISIONS BY SELECTED
LOCAL AGENCIES
ALLEGHENY COUNTY (CLASS IV)
(Pittsburgh,  PA)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
BAY AREA APCD (CLASS I)
(San Francisco, CA)
     o  Adopts  the minimum emission monitoring requirements for all source
        categories detailed in Appendix P, Part 51.
     o  Does not specify any procedures for data reduction.
     o  Requires continuous monitoring also of:
        (1)  CO boiler of FBCCU catalyst regenerator - SO
        (2)  CO boiler of fluid coker regenerator (> 10,000 bbl/day) -
             opacity, SO
        (3)  Sulfur recovery plant (> 100 tpd of SO ) - S0?
     o  FFFSG with capacity factor > 30% may request exemption from CM if
        use factor > 30% is due to drought conditions (expires 12/31/79).
     o  CM recorded violation of emission standard must be reported within
        96 hours.
     o  All affected facilities must submit in writing a compliance program
        for implementing CM.
                                 111-19

-------
     o  General provision requiring all kraft pulp mills to continuously.
        monitor TRS from:
        -  kraft recovery furnaces
           lime kilns
BOSTON, MA (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
CHICAGO, IL (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
DADE COUNTY (CLASS IV)
(Miami, FL)             ' '' '     '     '  '
     o  Nothing more than a general provision for continuous automatic monitor-
        ing, testing, and records.
DENVER, CO (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
JEFFERSON COUNTY  (CLASS II)
(Louisville, KY)                           '           •       •
     o  Specifies that the following facilities shall conduct continuous
        monitoring as prescribed by U. S. E. P. A. and by District:
        (1)  indirect heat exchangers > 250 x 10  Btu/hour
        (2)  nitric acid plants
        (3)  sulfuric acid plants
        (4)  petroleum refineries
        and
        (5)  storage vessels of volatile organic materials  (cap. ^_ 40,000  gal.)
        (6)  sewage  treatment  plants
     o  Does not  have any other details as specified  in Part 51, nor  are
        Appendix  P or Appendix B  referenced.
                                111-20

-------
PHILADELPHIA, PA (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
PUGET SOUND APCA (CLASS IV)
(Seattle, WA)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing sources.
ST. LOUIS, MO (CLASS IV)
     o  No provisions for continuous monitoring at existing^sources.
SOUTH COAST (CA) AQMD (CLASS I)
     o  Follows  the basic format of Appendix P, Part 51.
     o  No provisions for opacity monitoring from any source.
     o  Continuous  monitoring of "gaseous sulfur compounds" (calculated as
        SCO required at:
        (1)  sulfuric acid plants
        (2)  sulfur recovery plants equipped with oxidizing tail gas units
        (3)  CO  boilers of FBCCU regenerators
        (4)  new and existing fluid cokers > 10,000 bbls/day
     o  Procedures  for installation, calibration, maintenance and operation
        are referenced to Part 60 requirements for the particular source, i.e.,
        (1)  FFFSG  - 40 CFR 60.45
        (2)  sulfuric acid plants - 40 CFR 60.84
        (3)  nitric acid plants - 40 CFR 60.73
        (4)  petroleum refineries - 40 CFR 60.105
     o  Performance Specifications //2 and //3 of Appendix B, Part 60, are
        incorporated.
     o  Summaries of emission monitoring data must be submitted monthly.
     o  Excess emissions must be reported within 96 hours.
     o  Monitoring  equipment shutdown or breakdown of more  than 60 minutes
        must be  reported within 48 hours; requirement to conduct monitoring
        is waived up to 96 consecutive hours; extension of  waiver available
        only by  emergency variance.
                                111-21

-------
        Specific clause giving a representative of AQMD the authority to
        inspect the continuous monitoring system.
        General provision for possibility of continuous monitoring for:
        (1)  any source emitting > 992 tons CO/year
        (2)  any source emitting > 99 tons/year of any air contaminant
             except CO.
WAYNE COUNTY (CLASS IV)
(Detroit, MI)
     o
Little more than enabling legislation allowing that the following may
be required to use "emission recording monitoring devices":
(1)  fuel-burning equipment
(2)  refuse-burning equipment
(3)  process equipment
                                111-22

-------
            ADDENDUM TO VOLUME I
IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING SOURCE CATEGORIES
    SUBJECT TO STATE-ADOPTED REGULATIONS
                      -1-

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : ALABAMA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Coke Ovens
FFFSG >250 MMBtu (Existing)
Sulfuric Acid Plants (Existing)
Sulfuric Acid Plants (Existing >300 TPD)
Sulfuric Acid Plants (New)
Petroleum Refinery
Process Gas Stream
Kraft Pulp Mills
FFSG >250 MMBtu (New)
Nitric Acid Plants
Fuel Burning Equipment
PARAMETER
OPACITY
0
®
•









so2


o
€>@
^
®B
0




©
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



0

&
0
0
0



NOX




.




0
0

co2/o2


^









      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : ALASKA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Incinerators
Industrial Processes
Fuel Burning Equipment
Sulfite Pulp Mills
Kraft Mill
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®
©
•



so2

$
($
QG

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



jflk ten

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: ARIZONA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Sources
Incinerators
Fuel Burning Equipment
Heater - Planers
Sulfite Pulp
Sulfuric Acid Plants
Cement Plants
Copper Smelters
Nitric Acid Plants
PARAMETER
OPACITY
e
®
&
$





so2
•

*

0
.,•
®
•

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2







®

NOX


%





9
co2/o2









      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY


STATE : ARKANSAS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Process Equipment



. , ... . ....


OPACITY
0
*

jf •




so2


*•" •
-: • ;
*• .'•
.
PARAMETER
cm trim
oULrUK
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00








NOX

-5 '-

*•




co2/o2





' •*• V
      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : CALIFORNIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Refinery Boilers, New Cokers, Existing Boilers
Industrial Process
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Fuel Burning Equipment
Steam Generators
All Sources
Sulfur Recovery
Nitric Acid Plants
PARAMETER
OPACITY




0^
0


so2

0
0 ^
0

0
® 4>

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2








NOX



0




co2/o2
00



#



      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED COIJTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : COLORADO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Alfalfa Dehydration Plant
Pilot Plants
Coal and Oil FireJ Operations
National Gas Desulfurization
Petroleum Refinery
Shale Oil Production
Shale Oil Refinery
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Process Unit
Combustion Turbines
PARAMETER
OPACITY
^
a
%








so2
Q


0-
®
a
$
%
$
$
*
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2








O


NOX











co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : CONNECTICUT
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Gas-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment
Oil-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment
Coal-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment (New)
Coal-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment (Old)
Stationary Gas Turbine
Nitric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Sulfite Pulp
Other Process Sources
Nonferrous Smelter (Copper)
PARAMETER
OPACITY

o m
© n





© 19

so2






a


•
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2






®
a


NOX
£
a
a
e
Q
•




co2/o2










      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: CONNECTICUT (Cont.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Nonferrous Smelter (Zinc)
Nonferrous Smelter (Lead)
Incinerators
All Sources
PARAMETER

OPACITY


$ El
e m

so2
0
®


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





NOX





co2/o2




      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : DELAWARE
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Nitric Acid Plant
All Facilities
Sewage Treatment Facility
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Asphalt Concrete Plant
Sulfur Recovery
Fuel Burning Equipment (New)
Fuel Burning Equipment (Existing)
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®^
® ^
®

®
*•-.;
© ^
•• •

so2



^f ^Jr


tb &&

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





0^>

.

NOX






®^

'
co2/o2
4*





^

      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fossil Fueled Steam Generators
Process Facilities
All Sources
PARAMETER

OPACITY


®m

so2

®m

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2




NOX
®a



co2/o2



      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : FLORIDA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Incinerator
Sulfuric Acid Plant (New)
Sulfuric Acid Plant (Existing)
FFSG
FFSG >250 MMBtu (New)
FFSG >250 MMBtu (Existing)
Nitric Acid Plant
Carbonaceous Fuel Burning Equipment
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Kraft Pulp Mills
PARAMETER

OPACITY
©
©
0
®
®


®
®



so2


0
©

©E
®m


®

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2


©







©

NOX





®

©




co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: GEORGIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Incinerators
Fuel Burning Equipment
Portland Cement Plant
Nitric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Conical Burners
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®
m •
e
®
®
6


so2
•

0


®m

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





0


NOX
©

•

®m



co2/o2







      EMISSION  STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: HAWAII
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
All Sources
PARAMETER

OPACITY

®

so2
®

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



NOX



co2/o2


      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : IDAHO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Orchard Heating Device
Stationary Sources
Wigwam Burners
Fuel Burning
Kraft Pulp Mills
Sulfuric Acid Plant - Burning Elemental
Sulfur
Zinc/Lead Smelters
NSPS
FFFSG > 250 MM Btu
Portlant Cement Plant
Nitric Acid Plant
PARAMETER
OPACITY
ft







• ^
ft
•
S02





*
• +

• +


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



.







NOX








• •

* +
co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS  MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL  CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: IDAHO (Cone.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Petroleum Refinery
Secondary Lead Smelter
Secondary Brass and Bronze Ingot Production
Municipal Sludge Incinerator
Sulfite Pulp Mills
Kraft Pulp Mills
PARAMETER
OPACITY
@
@^
®
9
®
®

so2
®#
®$>



© ^
Q
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2
®
®<^




® ^
NOX







co2/o2







      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : ILLINOIS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fuel Combustion Source
Portland Cement Plant (New)
Stationary Sources
Process Emissions
Coke Ovens
Grain Handling Operation
Nitric Acid Mfg.
Sulfuric Acid Plants (New)
H2S Flare
Petroleum and Petro-Chemical Processes FGD
Sulfuric Acid Usage
PARAMETER
OPACITY
©
®
©

$
®
®




so2
©


®



®
$
©

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



®






®
N0y
A



•


®




co2/o2











      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : INDIANA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Fuel Combustion Sources
Sulfur Recovery Plants and All Other Sources
FFFSG > 250 MM Btu
Nitric Acid Plant > 300 TPD Acid
Sulfuric Acid Plant > 300 TPD Acid
Petroleum Refinery Catalyst Regenerator
(> 20,000 bbls/day)
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®


<$>


^


so2

•
$
^

^


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2









NOX
0



4>




co2/o2



•




      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: IOWA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fuel Burning Unit
Sulfuric Acid Plant
All Facilities
Incinerators
Coal Fired Steam Generators
PARAMETER

OPACITY

4fe
®
9
**

so2
©

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: KANSAS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Indirect Heating Equipment
Incinerators
Processing of Materials
Nonferrous Smelters (Zn, Pb)
Process Gas Streams
Indirect Heating Equipment (New)
PARAMETER
OPACITY
<®
$
$



so2



$
6
0
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2




e

NOX





•
co2/o2






      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : KENTUCKY
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Process Operations
Indirect Heat Exchangers (>50 MMBtu)
Indirect Heat Exchangers (>250 MMBtu)
Portland Cement Plant
Nitric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Asphalt Concrete Plant
Petroleum Refineries
Secondary Lead Smelters
Secondary Brass & Bronze Ingot Production
Municipal Sludge Incinerators
Sulfite Pulp Mills
PARAMETER

OPACITY
c>
9
®^
$
®
®
©
Q^>
®
©
9


so2

©
© ^&


Q&

©^



®
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2





G







NOX


®^

••








co2/o2







^




      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS  MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: KENTUCKY (continued)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Kraft Pulp Mills
Incinerators
Indirect Heat Exchangers (>50 MMBtu/hr)
Indirect Heat Exhangers (>250 MMBtu/hr)
Process Operations
Sulfuric Acid Plants
Nitric Acid Plants
Sulfite Pulp Mills
Process Gas Stream
PARAMETER

OPACITY

©
©
©^
©
®
0



S02


®
®^

®^

0
©
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2
<$>




©


0

NOX






©^



co2/o2









      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : LOUISIANA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Combustion Unit
Safety Flares
All Sources Except FCCU Incinerator-
Waste Heat Boiler
FCCU Incinerator-Waste Heat Boiler
Chemical Woodpulping
Sulfuric Acid Plant
All Sources
Nitric Acid Plants
FFFSG > 250 MM Btu/hr
Sulfuric Acid Plant > 300 tpd
Nitric Acid Plant > 300 tpd
Cat. Cracker Regenerator * 20,000 bbls/day
PARAMETER
OPACITY
•
®
®
d




4>


*
so2




®
®
®

&
^


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





©






NOX








-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : MAINE
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Sulfite Pulping
Incinerators
All Sources
PARAMETER

OPACITY

•
•

S02
*


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00




NOX




co2/o2



      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: MARYLAND
AFFECTED FACILITY:
AH Facilities
Non-Fuel Burning Facility
Coke Ovens
Fuel Burning Equipment
Nitric Acid Plant
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®

0



so2

%
&


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2






NOX



e
0

co2/o2





      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : MASSACHUSETTS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fossil Fuel Facility
Industrial Facilities
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Stationary Sources Other than Incinerator
Incinerators

PARAMETER
OPACITY
© BJ


®
•

so2
•
<§
V



SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2






NOX
* B-
(§> m


•''•

co2/o2





•-f-
      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : MICHIGAN
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Power Plants
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®


so2

9
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00



N0y
A



co2/o2


      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : MINNESOTA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Indirect Heating Equipment
Indirect Heating Equipment (New)
Industrial Process Equipment
Incinerator
Stationary Sources
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant (New)
Nitric Acid Plant
Portland Cement Plant
Asphalt Concrete Plant
Petroleum Refinery
Secondary Lead Smelter
PARAMETER
OPACITY
•

$
$
®

®
0
$
®
®$>
©
so2
®




®&




<&•

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2






^^ ^r



co2/o2












      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS'STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: MINNESOTA (Cont.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Secondary Brass and Bronze Ingot Production
Municipal Sludge Incinerator
Direct Heating Equipment
PARAMETER
OPACITY
$
9
e
so2


e
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



NOX



co2/o2



      EMISSION  STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: MISSISSIPPI
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Kraft Pulp Mills
Sulfuric Acid Plants
Sulfur Recovery Plants
Copper, Zinc, Lead Smelters
Fuel Burning Equipment
PARAMETER
OPACITY
to





so2
9

9
g
9
®
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2
®
$
*


-•
N0y
A






co2/o2






      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: MISSOURI
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Incinerators
Teepee Burners
Process Sources
Fuel Burning Equipment
PARAMETER

OPACITY
9m
©
*



so2
e


•

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00






NOX






co2/o2





      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : MONTANA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Incinerators
Single Sources
Stationary Sources
Wood Waste Burner
Primary Nonferrous Smelters - Cu, Pb, Zn
Fuel Burning Equipment
Gaseous Fuel Burning
Kraft Pulp Mills
PARAMETER
OPACITY
&
®
&
©




so2




d
$
$

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2







^^>
NOX








co2/o2








      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : NEBRASKA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Facilities
Fossil Fueled Steam Generators

Industrial Sources
Nitric Acid Plant
Fossil Fuel Burning Equipment
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®
® ^





so2





$
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2


*




MOX







co2/o2






      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : NEVADA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Copper Smelters
Petroleum Refineries
Primary Nonferrous Smelters
Primary Nonferrous Smelters (Copper)
Fuel Burning Units
Non-Fuel Burning Process
Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
Sulfuric Acid Plants
All Sources
Kiln
Clinker Cooler
PARAMETER
OPACITY

®fy
e<&



® ^
®$>

© 1$>
®*
S02
®^
0
$ <^
9 ^




«•


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2
®

® ^
©•
®fy
®ty
0 ^
® 4>



NOX











co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: NEVADA (Continued)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All New Sources
Coal Preparation Plant
Incinerators
Nitric Acid Plant
Asphalt Concrete Plant
Secondary Lead Smelter
Ferroalloy Production
Secondary Brass & Bronze Plant
Iron and Steel Plant
Sewage Treatment Plants
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants
PARAMETER
OPACITY
«•
© ^
9 •
®4>
® <^
9 ^^
$><$
®<&
© 4>
©4»
®^
so2











SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2











NOX











co2/o2











      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: NEW HAMPSHIRE
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fuel Burning Equipment
Steam Generators
Incinerators
Wood Waste Burner
Asphalt Plant
Kraft Pulp Mill
Nonferrous Smelter (Copper)
Nonferrous Smelter (Zinc)
Nonferrous Smelter (Lead) ,
Secondary Lead Smelters
Brass and Bronze Ingot Production
PARAMETER
OPACITY
9
®
®
®
®




9
9
so2
©




®
$
®
®


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





$





NOX











co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: NEW JERSEY
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fossil Fuel Burning Unit (Coal)
Sulfur Recovery
All Sources
Indirect Heat Exchanger
Incinerators ,
PARAMETER

OPACITY



9


S02
•
$



SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2


9



MOX






co2/o2





      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: NEW MEXICO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Wood Waste Burner
Nonferrous Smelter
Petroleum Processing Facility (Existing)
Coal Fired Boilers > 250 MM Btu
Oil Burning Equipment •
Gas Burning Equipment
Gasification Plant
Kraft Pulp Mill
Natural Gas Processing
Petroleum Refinery (New)
Petroleum Refinery (All)
PARAMETER
OPACITY
0
0
0
0








so2



0
0*
0
0
0


D

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00
L.


0
0



0
0
0

0
MOX




0
0
0





co2/o2




^







      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
REGION VI - EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: NEW MEXICO (Cent.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Hydrocarbon Storage :
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant
',1 !
PARAMETER

OPACITY ;





so2



:
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2 :
•
A
w



NOX





co2/o2




                  EMISSION.STANDARD  FOR  PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
                  DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: NEW YORK
AFFECTED FACILITY:
By Produce Coke Oven Batteries
Incinerators
Portland Cement Process
Portland Cement Kiln or Clinker Cooler
Nitric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Stationary Combustion Installations
Petroleum Refineries
All Sources
PARAMETER
OPACITY
0
0
<$m
0m
': 0
0
i 0m

.... . .
so2
0




• ^



SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





Qty

0

NOX




0 +

*•


co2/o2









      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY.
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: NORTH CAROLINA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Lightweight Aggregate Processes - Kilns
Fuel Burning Installations
Sulfuri.c Acid Plants
Sulfuric Acid Plants (Chamber Process)
Boilers >250 MMBtu
Nitric Acid Plants
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®







so2

®
®
0



SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



©




NOX




•
9
O

co2/o2







      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: NORTH DAKOTA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Existing Sources
Stationary Sourcos (Existing)
Stationary Sources (New) and Incinerators
Fuel Burning Installations
PARAMETER
OPACITY

0
€>

so2



«
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2




NOX




co2/o2




      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : OHIO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Process Equipment
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Smelters (Cu, Zn, Pb ) ''
Sulfite' Pulp Mill ' -'
Fuel Burning Installation .»;•••
Process Gas Stream *
Nitric Acid Plant
Combustion Sources > 250 MM Btu
PARAMETER
OPACITY
®







-

so2

$
©
O
®
e
®
©


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2


©

•


©


NOX ;








9
9
co2/o2










      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : OKLAHOMA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Incinerator
Stationary Sources
Sulfuric Acid Plant
IFuel Burning Equipment > 250 MM Btu
Fuel Burning Equipment > 50 MM Btu (New)
Fuel Burning Equipment (New)
Nitric Acid Plant (New)
Petroleum and Natural Gas Processes (New)
Petroleum Refineries
Sulfur Recovery Plant (New)
Nonferrous Smelters (New)
Paper Pulp Mill (New)
PARAMETER

OPACITY
9
$
9
&


9

<&




so2


e^
•

G^

$

©<£
em
®&
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2


*




9





NOX




©

$






co2/o2



•








      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED COIJTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
REGION X  - EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : OREGON
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Wigwam Wood Waste Burner
Kraft Pulp Mill
Primary Aluminum Plant
Veneer Dryers
Laterite Ore Production of Ferronickel
Fuel Burning Equipment
Sulfite Pulp Mill > 110 ton/day
PARAMETER

OPACITY
@
9

®
«
®



so2


®



0

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2

4Bt J&.
®<@>






M0y
A









co2/o2








                  EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
                  DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Facilities
By Product Coke Ovens
Combustion Units
Primary Zinc Smelters
PARAMETER

OPACITY
@




so2
®

©
@
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2

©



NOX





co2/o2




      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: PUERTO RICO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary sources
Fuel burning equipment
Process gas stream
Sulfuric acid plant
Sulfur recovery plant
Primary nonferrous smelters
Sulfite pulp mill
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®


•
',
;


so2

O
fffl
UyM
9
o
$
9
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2




.



NOX






•

co2/o2







      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: RHODE ISLAND
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Facilities
Fossil Fuel Fired Steam or Hot Water
Generators
' . • . ' v ' - •.-
1 ' . '
I
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®
&
'




so2 :






SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00







NOX





•

co2/o2






      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: SOUTH CAROLINA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
FFSG >250 MMBtu
Incinerators
Fuel Burning Sources
Siilfuric Acid Plants
PARAMETER

OPACITY
©
@ ^b
•



so2



®

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00






NOX






co2/o2





      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: SOUTH DAKOTA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
iJcod Waste Burner
Incinerator
Fuel Burning Equipment
NSPS
FFFSG > 250MM Bt'u
Portlard Cement Plant
Nitric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Asphalt Concrete Plant
Petroleum Refinery
Secondary Lead Smelter
PARAMETER

OPACITY
*$)
®
®


G<>
{3&
®
®
<§
a<^
e

so2



©

flfr 
-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: SOUTH DAKOTA (Cont.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Secondary Brass and Bronze Ingot Production
Municipal Sludge Incinerator
; PARAMETER !

OPACITY
$


S02


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



NOX



co2/o2


      EMISSION  STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: TENNESSEE
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All air contaminant sources
Certain existing sources
Fuel burning installation
Air contaminant source
Sulfuric acid plant
New air contaminant
Sources > 250 MM Btu/hr
Nitric acid plant
FFFSG > 250 MM Btu
Sulfuric acid plants > 300 tpd
Petroleum refinery
Cat. cracker regenerator
> 20,000 bbls/day
PARAMETER
OPACITY
©
& «$>





4>

+
so2


©
^



O
4?

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2




®





NOX





$
©



co2/o2







^


      EMISSION  STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: TEXAS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Flue
Stationary Flue (> 100,000 acfm)
Waste Gas Flare
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Nonf errous... Smelters
FFFSG
Primary Copper Smelter
Primary Zinc Smelter
Primary Lead Smelter __
Other Primary Smelter
PARAMETER
OPACITY
»
@M •
m








so2
'


© ;
% \
®
"«'
^m -
®m
• :
®m
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
S00











HOX
••


.-


•"
-

• - •

co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: TEXAS (Cont.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Secondary Metal Recovery
FFFSG > 600 M Ib/hr. Steam
Nitric Acid Plant
Sulfuric Acid Plants (As SO Control in
Nonferrous Smelter)
PARAMETER
OPACITY





so2
9


9m

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
soz





NOX





co2/o2





      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: UTAH
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources (Existing)
Stationary Sources (New)
Diesel and Internal Combustion
Nonferrous Smelter
Fuel Burning Equipment
PARAMETER
OPACITY
®
v£
®


S02

<$

$
£
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2





NOX





co2/o2





      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : VERMONT
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Combustions Installations
All Facilities
PARAMETER
OPACITY

®
so2
®

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2


NOX
0

co2/o2


      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE : VIRGINIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generators
Catalyst Regenerators for Fluid Bed
Catalytic Cracking Regenerators
All Sources
By Product Coke Ovens
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Combustion Installation
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Lightweight Aggregate
Nonferrous Smelters
Petroleum Refineries; Fuel Gas Combustion
Device
PARAMETER

OPACITY
© ^

<£
©
%








so2
0^




®^
$
9
©
©
^

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





9







NOX
^












co2/o2
^











      EMISSION-STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: VIRGINIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Nitric Acid Plant
Process Gas Streams
Kraft Pulp Mills
PARAMETER

OPACITY




so2



SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2

9
9

NOX
0^



co2/o2



      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL  CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: VIRGIN ISLANDS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Existing sources
New sources...
Fuel oil combustion
•
PARAMETER

OPACITY
•
®

.-

. so2


e

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





NOX
1


•

co2/o2




      EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : WASHINGTON
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Primary Aluminum Plants
Stationary Sources
Hog Fuel Boilers
Catalytic Cracker
Kraft Pulping Mills
Sulfite Pulping Mills
FF.FSG > 250 .MM Btu
Sulfuric Acid Plant > 300 TPD Acid
Catalytic Cracker Regenerator > 20,000
bbls/day
Wood Residue FSG > 100 MM Btu/hr
PARAMETER
OPACITY
®
0
•
©
OH
OH
*
-,
*
"
so2

•



•^
*
*


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2




• ^





NOX










co2/o2






^



      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY

STATE: WEST VIRGINIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Facilities
Incinerators
Hot Mix Asphalt Plant
Refinery Process Gas Stream

Fuel Burning Facility
Manufacturing Process
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Sulfur Recovery Plant
Nonferrous Smelter
Sulfite Pulp Mill
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®
®
©

\ '''







so2





€>
$
®
®
^
®
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
. OTHER THAN
so2



9








NOX












co2/o2











      EMISSION. STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE: WISCONSIN
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Asphalt Concrete Plant
Petroleum Refinery
Lead Smelters
Brass and Bronze Ingot Production
Municipal Sludge Incinerator
FFFSG > 250 MM Btu/hr. (New)
Sulfuric Acid Plant (New)
Kraft Pulp Mills
Gasoline and Diesel Engine
Nitric Acid Plant (New)
PARAMETER
OPACITY
®
ft
ft
e
®
ft



o>

so2


ft



ft
ft



SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2


ft





ft


NOX






ft



ft
co2/o2











      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
STATE : WYOMING
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources (New)
Stationary Sources (Existing) (Except
Incinerators)
Fuel Burning Equipment (New) Used for
Indirect Heating
Incinerators
Wood Waste Burners
Sulfuric Acid Plant
Fuel Burning Equipment
Nitric Acid Plant
Diesel Engines
PARAMETER
OPACITY
$
®
Q
®
®



©
so2





®
$


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





<»



NOX






a
$

co2/o2









      EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
      DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
      GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                              EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL

STATE: ALLEGHENY COUNTY
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All sources
Incinerators
Coke ovens
V *"
Blast furnace slips
Fuel-burning or combustion equipment
Sulfuric acid plant
Sulfur recovery plant
By-product, (coke - oven gas
"••••'••
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®
€>
©
©

\C-'
-3

•'-if

so2
9



© :
©
©


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





o

©


NOX




=

,



co2/o2









                                    EMISSION  STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                                    DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  REGULATIONS
                                    GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                              EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL
STATE: BAY AREA APCD SAN FRANCISCO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All sources
Incinerators
All heat transfer op.
New heat transfer op.
(4/19/72) > 250 MM Btu/hr
All heat transfer op.
> 1,750 MM Btu/hr
General combustion and operations
Sulfuric acid plant
Sulfur production
Sulfur manufacturing^ 100 tpd SO
Fuel burning - solid or liquid fuel
PARAMETER
OPACITY
®
0
®


©




so2
®
®
©


O


0
®
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2






®
®


NOX



®
®





co2/o2










                                    EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                                    DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                                    GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                              EMISSIONS  STANDARD  AND  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  SUMMARY
LOCAL
STATE: BAY AREA APCD SAN FRANCISCO (Cont.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Diraethylsulf ide source
Mercaptan source
Kraft Pulp Mill
FFFSG > 250 MM Btu/hr
CO boiler - :FBCC regenerator
CO boiler - fluid coker regenerator
> 10,000 bbl/day
Sulfur recovery plant > 100 tpd of SO-
(New 11/3/76)
"'*.""
Sulfuric acid plant
Nitric acid plant (New 9/7/77)
Nitric acid plant (Existing 9/7/77) > 300 tpd
PARAMETER
OPACITY



4>
: &
&
r"i '


so2
'•'••


^w/FGI
^>
^
t


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2
*
9
' ©m






MOX
'•


4,
• '
'-..

^
+
co2/o2



^





                                   EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                                   DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                                   GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
            EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL

AGENCY: BOSTON
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fuel Burning Equipment
All Sources
PARAMETER

OPACITY
0


S02

0
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



NOX



co2/o2


                  EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
            EMISSIONS  STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL

AGENCX: CHICAGO
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Stationary Sources
Space Heating Equipment
Industrial Processes and Power Plants
Electrical Generating
PARAMETER

OPACITY
®




so2
®
V
@

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2
0




NOX





co2/o2




                  EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
            EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING  SUMMARY
LOCAL

AGENCY: DADE COUNTY

AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Sources
Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
PARAMETER


OPACITY
•



so2

:-
SULFUR .
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2




NOX




co2/o2


                 EMISSION STANDARD FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                 DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                 GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
             EMISSIONS  STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS  MONITORING  SUMMARY
LOCAL
AGENCY: DENVER
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Sources
PARAMETER
OPACITY
©
S02
#
SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2

NOX

co2/o2

                  EMISSION STANDARD FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                              EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS  MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL
STATE: JEFFERSON COUNTY
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Process operations
Indirect, heat exchanger
Waterwall spreader-stoker heat exchanger
All other waterwall indirect heat exchanger
Incinerators
Process gas stream
Indirect heat exchangers > 250 MM Btu/hr
Nitric acid plant > 300 tpd
Sulfuric acid plant > 300 tpd
Petroleum refinery
Cat. cracker regenerator
> 20,000 bbls/day
PARAMETER
OPACITY
0
©
®
®
0

^


*
so2

e



©
^

<^

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2





0




MOX
0






^


co2/o2







-------
            EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL
AGENCY : PHILADELPHIA
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Sources Except Incinerators
Nitric Acid Plants
Incinerators
All Sources
Fuel Burning Equipment
PARAMETER
OPACITY
*
©
©


S02



0

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2



$

NOX

*


$
co2/o2





                  EMISSION  STANDARD  FOR  (PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REGULATIONS

-------
            EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS  MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL
AGENCY: PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
AGENCY
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Sources
PARAMETER
OPACITY
9
so2

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2

NOX

co2/o2

                  EMISSION  STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED  CONTINUOUS  MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
            EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL
AQENCY: ST. LOUIS
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Fuel Burning Equipment
All Sources
Incinerators
PARAMETER
OPACITY

*
e
so2
©


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2

9

NOX



co2/o2



                  EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                              EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL
STATE: SOUTH COAST AQMD LOS ANGELES
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Emission source
Coke ovens ",
Natural gas •• combustion
Process gas* combustion
Liquid fuel combustion
Electric power plant-steam generators
Electric power plant generating equipment
(New 5/7/76) > 50 MM Btu/hr
Sulfur recovery unit
Sulfuric acid units
Solid fossil fuel combustion
Fuel burning equipment > 555 MM Btu/hr
PARAMETER
OPACITY
d
(B









so2


@
®
•
%

<3 ^
$> o
®

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2











NOX






®



®
co2/o2











                                    EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                                    DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                                    GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                             EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL

STATE: SOUTH COAST AQMD LOS ANGELES (cont.)
AFFECTED FACILITY:
Steam generating equipment > 555 MM Btu/hr
Steam generating equipment (New 5/7/76)
> 50 MM Btu/hr
Steam generators > 250 MM Btu/hr
Nitric Acid Plant (New 10/1/78)
Nitric acid plant (Existing 10/1/78
> 300 tpd)
CO boilers - FCCM regenerators
Fluid cokers > 10,000 bb Is/day
PARAMETER

OPACITY










so2



•



•

SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAN
so2










NOX
*
®

•
•
#




co2/o2



^





                                   EMISSION STANDARD FOR PARTICULAR  CATEGORY
                                   DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                                   GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
            EMISSIONS STANDARD AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY
LOCAL

AGENCY: WAYNE COUNTY
AFFECTED FACILITY:
All Sources
Electric Power Plants and Steam Generators
Residential Space and Water Heating
Sulfuric Acid Plants
Sulfur Recovery
Petroleum Refinery
PARAMETER

OPACITY
«B

v,




so2
®
©S3
©
^m


SULFUR
COMPOUNDS
OTHER THAU
so2



oa
0 H
©a

NOX







co2/o2






                  EMISSION STANDARD FOR  PARTICULAR CATEGORY
                  DETAILED CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS
                  GENERAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING REGULATIONS

-------
                                 TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
I. REPORT NO.
  RPA
                            2.
                                                        3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE ANDSUBTITLE
                                              Qf
                                                        5. REPORT DATE
State Regulations for S02,  NOX,  Opacity, Con-
tinuous Monitoring,  and Applicable Test Method
         	vnlnmp  T	.	
                                                                   July 1M78
                                                        6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
                R.  Cline  (ES),  Paul Stenburg  (ES)
 Keith  Felts  (ES) ,  Howard Wright, Louis Paley
                                                        8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

 Engineering-Science Inc.  (ES)
 7903 Westpark Drive
 McLean  va.   22101
                                                        10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                       11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 U.S. environmental  Protection  Agency
 Division of  Stationary Source  Enf.   (EN-341)
 401 M St., S.W.
       .  n .r    9 n/i fin	
                                                        13. TYPEJ3F REPOR.T AND PE.HJOD COVERED
                                                             Tinal  to iy/7
                                                       14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
    Current copies of the air pollution control regulations of all fifty states, three
erritories, and twelve local agencies  were  reviewed for the purpose of compiling infor-
lation on emission standards, compliance test methods, and continuous emission monitorinc
s applied to existing stationary sources.
U.
                                         Specific pollutants of  interest were opacity,
                                             The intent of this  review was  to
    NO , and sulfur compounds other than S00.
de'ntify the assortment of types, formats, and  exemptions which prevail in existing SIP
•egulations for selected sources and pollutants,  thereby providing guidance to EPA for
riting future continuous emission monitoring regulations.  This report is not to be user
is an all inclusive reference document for such information.

    The primary focus of this review and compilation was the following existing source
'ategories:

                                   continued on next page
17.
                              KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
                                          b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
 Air  Pollution  Control
 Reliability
 Monitors
                                               Continuous
                                               Monitors
                                                                       13B
                                                                       14D
                                                                       14G
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Unclassified
                                          19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                                                                     21. NO. OF PAGES
                                            20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                                     22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE

-------
                                                          INSTRUCTIONS

   1.   REPORT NUMBER
        Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

   2.   LEAVE BLANK

   3.   RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
        Reserved for use by each report recipient.

   4.   TITLE AND SUBTITLE
        Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
        type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
        number and include subtitle for the specific title.

   5.   REPORT DATE
        Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date of
        approval, date of preparation, etc.).

   6.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
        Leave blank.

   7.   AUTHOR(S)
        Give name(s) in conventional  order (John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.).  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
        zation.

   8.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
        Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.

   9.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
        Give name, street, city, state,  and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.

   10.  PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
        Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included  in parentheses.

   11.  CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
        Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.

   12.  SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
        Include ZIP code.

   13.  TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
        Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.

   14.  SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
        Insert appropriate  code.

   15.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
        Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as:  Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of, Presented'at conference of,
        To be published in. Supersedes, Supplements, etc.

   16.  ABSTRACT
        Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
        significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.

   17.  KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
        (a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the major
        concept of the research and are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.

        (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
        ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.

        (c) COSAT1 ITELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List.  Since the ma-
        jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
        endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
        the primary posting(s).

   18.  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
        Denote releasability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
        the public, with address and price.

   19. &20.  SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
        DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

   21.  NUMBER OF PAGES
        Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.

   22.  PRICE
        Insert the price set by the National Technical  Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) (Reverse)

-------
     cont. /pg2
                              OPACITY

     o     Fossil  tuel-fireci steam generators (FFFSO)

     o     Portland cement plants

     o     Catalvst regenerators of fluio bed catalytic
           cracking units (FBCCU)

     o     Hog  fuel-fired boilers

     o     Kraft recovery furnaces

     o     Usiiic oxygen process furnaces (fiOPF)

     o     Ferroalloy electric submerged arc  furnaces

           iS
-------