REPORT OF THE
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDY
Prepared in Cooperation with the States of
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia,
and West Virginia
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Public Health Service
Bureau of State Services
Division of Sanitary Engineering Services
Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center
Cincinnati, Ohio
November 1958
-------
821R58001
REPORT OF THE
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDY
Prepared in Cooperation with the States of
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia,
and West Virginia
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEAItfH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Public Health Service
Bureau of State Services
Division of Sanitary Engineering Services
Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center
Cincinnati, Ohio
November 1958
U.S. EPA Region III
Regional Cento* for Environmental
Information
1650 Arch Street (3PM52)
Philadelphia, PA 19103
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Foreword v
Report pf the Potomac River Basin Study - Part I
Water Quality Studies vii
Introduction 1
Scope of Fiscal Year 1958 Activities 2
Collection of Data 3
Discussion of Data 6
Conclusions 8
Recommendations 10
Report of the Potomac River Basin Study - Part II
Tabulation of Data on Water Uses in the
Potomac River Basin ix
Compilation of Existing Data on Water Uses and Quality xl
Explanation of Tabulation and Superscripts xii
Key to Symbols xv
Water Supply - Treatment xv
Waste Discharge - Treatment xviii
Industrial Waste Treatment Operations and Processes xxii
Tabulation of Data 1-20
ill
-------
FOREWORD
Part I of this report reviews the proposals made by the
Public Health Service to the Corps of Engineers, Washington District,
for the collection and evaluation of data, and reports progress
relative to the Water Quality Program for the Potomac River Basin.
Sources and availability of existing water quality data are
discussed. Recommendations for future activities, and procedures for
achieving the desired objectives are included.
Part II of the report is a tabulation of water uses in the
Potomac River Basin.
-------
REPORT
of the
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDY
PART I
WATER QUALITY STUDIES
vli
-------
INTRODUCTION
On October 7, 1957, the Public Health Service submitted to the
Corps of Engineers, Washington District, a report entitled,
"Proposal for Initial Report on Water Quality Program for the Potomac
River Basin Review Report," in which it was proposed that the
Public Health Service prepare, during the remainder of Fiscal Year 1958,
an initial report based on available data and including a proposal for
additional work necessary for a final report on water quality in the
Potomac River Basin.
Approval of this proposal by the Corps of Engineers was indicated
in a letter dated October 29, 1957. The same letter also authorized
the Service to proceed with the work outlined in the proposal.
On December 3, 1957, the Public Health Service submitted to the
Corps of Engineers a proposal for completing a comprehensive study of
water quality in the Potomac River Basin during Fiscal Years 1958, 1959,
I960, and 1961. The Corps of Engineers approved this proposal by letter
dated June 6, 1958.
-------
SCOPE OF FISCAL YEAR 1958 ACTIVITIES
The proposals listed above Indicated that the scope of
Fiscal Year 1958 activities would Include:
A. Collection of available data from Federal, State, and
local agencies.
B. A start on analyses of available data, with emphasis on
the Washington Metropolitan Area.
C. Completion of a preliminary report to include, insofar
as possible, evaluation of existing water quality in""
problem areas; special consideration of the Washington
Metropolitan Area problem; catalog of additional data
needed for the final report; a schedule of special studies
required for necessary additional data; and, if necessary,
a revised estimate of cost of special studies and
completion of the final report.
-------
COLLECTION OF DATA
During Fiscal Year 1958, such data on the preceding items as
had been developed by others were collected and evaluated in order to
avoid duplication of work, and to prepare recommendations as to
additional work required to develop needed data. Visits were made to
the several State and regional agencies for the purpose of discussing
the proposed comprehensive water quality and water use study with each
agency, to obtain copies of all applicable data *-** reports previously
/' $'-«/>
developed by others, and to inquire as to any specific problem areas.// ,^, R
- -- ' - - - - ' v t
Acknowledgment is made of the cooperation of the following agencies in
furnishing information pertinent to the study:
Maryland Department of Health
Maryland Water Pollution Control Commission
Maryland Water Resources Commission
Pennsylvania Department of Health
Virginia State Health Department
Virginia State Water Control Board
West Virginia State Water Commission
Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin
District of Columbia Blue Plains Sewage Treatment Plant
-------
An invaluable record of water quality In the tidewater
Potomac River from Three Sisters Island to Fort Washington was available
from the District of Columbia Blue Plains Sewage Treatment Plant.
A routine river sampling and analysis program has been conducted, with-
out break, since September 22, 1937* Copies of «-T> analytical results
through 1956 previously had been made available to the Public Health
Service. It was necessary, however, to obtain additional data and to
obtain time of day of previous sample collections in order to correlate
magnitude of determinations with tidal variations. Times of sample
collections were available for the periods February 10, 19^3 to
November 25, 19^5; and September 30, 1953 to August 12, 1957. Times of
sample collections along with other pertinent data were placed in a
computer program to convert the sampled position to the low tide slack
position in order to compare all data at the same tidal position.
' Whether or not these data can be adequately correlated remains to be
proven and will require additional statistical analyses. The extent of
additional sampling in the tidal area necessary to supplement existing
data will be determined by these analyses.
Previous reports developed on the subject of the Potomac River
were assembled but have not yet been assimilated. These reports Include
the following:
"Hygienic Laboratory," Public Health Service, 1913-191U.
"Bacteriological Study," Public Health Service, 1925.
-------
"Study of Disposal of Sewage," Public Health Service, 1932.
"Benefits of Low Flow Augmentation," Public Health Service, 19UU.
"Water Pollution in the Potomac River Basin," Interstate
Commission on the Potomac River Basin, 195^.
"A Clean Potomac River in the Washington Metropolitan Area,"
Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, 1957.
-------
DISCUSSION OF DATA
The data received from the several agencies on water uses
,,f/ »
boon tabulated and arranged by tributary name, in sequence of occurrence
from the upper extremities of the basin to the mouth of the Potomac
Rivere aad~^r»4jaeludud aa Tai-fc II of this report? Preceding the tabu-
lation is an explanation of the headings and subscripts used, and a
Key to Symbols which describes the treatment of water supplies, sewage, '
and Industrial wastes.
i I*A
The data indicate that little stream survey work ba» been per-
u^o^°
formed by the several States, i* reueiiL -yea*». Consequently, there -is~
only very limited water quality data available. Virginia had made an
extensive stream survey on the South River in the vicinity of Waynesboro,
Virginia, in the summer of 1957. Pennsylvania had conducted a stream
survey of Conococheague Creek in 1951. In recent years, neither *faryland
nor West Virginia has conducted stream surveys in the basin. Copies of
data from these studies, while not included in this report, vl'lj be of
value to future studies necessary to provide a true picture of water
quality in the Potomac River and its tributaries. The data collected in
n-~
Fiscal Year 1958 will, however, be-included as a part of future studies.
-------
While each State had records of sources of wastes and known
problem areas, there are differences between State records and actual
situations, probably due to changes made in the field and a time lag in
recording such changes in State records.
An examination of the data pertaining to the Washington Metro-
that the information
currently available ts- not sufficient to adequately interpret the
effects of tidal action on pollution in the Washington
Metropolitan Area, nor to predict the probable effects of low-flow
Af*4> &**- P* e
augmentation from upstream reservoirs./ Additional stream studies w-lll
be- needed to obtain the data necessary for making the above interpre-
tations and predictions. Personnel well versed in the study of tidal
currents will be required for this work.
-------
CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of the information collected and analyzed during
*j*^
Fiscal Year 1958, it *« concluded that:
A. While all States have data on water uses in the basin,
in some cases the official records available have not yet
been brought up to date. Up-dating of such information is
necessary for evaluation of a reservoir development program.
B. With the few exceptions previously noted, there are no
recent water quality data available upon which to base aay
evaluation of impact of a reservoir development program.
C. The study of the portion of the Potomac River in tidewater
in the Washington, B.C. Metropolitan Area is complex and
v -, U-
-wlll require special skills in order to evaluate effects of
tidewater on pollution and the significance of low flow
/<<., >ft <°
augmentation from upstream reservoirs./ Considerable work
is now under way in assembling and analyzing data preliminary
to determination of additional field studies required and the
development of study techniques applicable to tidewater
conditions.
8
-------
D, The study of current and proposed future use of the
Potomac River as a source of public water supply will be a
large task and will require a concentrated effort of at least
one engineer for about a year.
-------
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to complete the comprehensive study of water quality
it is recommended that:
A. During Fiscal Year 1959 the following work should be
undertaken:
1. Stream surveys should be conducted on the main stem of
the Potomac River and its tributaries in that portion
of the basin from tidewater to Paw Paw, West Virginia,
in order to obtain data necessary for evaluation of water
quality and water uses in the basin with particular
reference to public water supplies.' At such time as the
"i
! Corps of Engineers determines exact locations of
reservoir sites it may be necessary to supplement Infor-
i mation gained in such a survey with additional field
| studies.
/
2. All water users within the basin should be contacted.
Current data on water use, treatment, and sources of
wastes should be developed and estimates of future water
uses, need of treatment, and magnitudes of waste loads
should be obtained from the water users.
10
-------
11
3. A field survey team should be organized to conduct a
field study of the water quality of the Potomac River
and each of its tributaries.
k. The analyses of the data pertaining to tidewater in
( Washington, D. C. Metropolitan Area)should be con-
i. /
tinued to establish a firm basis for future stream
studies in that portion of the basin.
5. An engineer skilled in pollution studies should be
trained in the techniques of oceanography in order to
better understand the Washington, D. C. Metropolitan
Area situation. This engineer will then have the
necessary skills required for the study of the tide-
... ----- water Potomac in the Washington area.
B. As a part of any Fiscal Year 1960 program, the service of
one engineer should be included to concentrate on a study
of current and proposed future use of the Potomac River as
a source of public water supply.
C. The schedules established for the study of the
Potomac River Basin for Fiscal Years 1959, I960, and 1961,
(as set forth in the proposal for completing a comprehensive
study of water quality in the basin, submitted to the
Corps of Engineers on December 3, 1957, and approved by the
Corps of Engineers on June 6, 1958) should be carried to
completion.
-------
REPORT
of the
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDY
PART II
TABULATION OP DATA ON WATER USES
IN THE POTOMAC RIVER BASIN
ix
-------
EXPLANATION OF TABULATION AND SUPERSCRIPTS
LOCATION
Municipality or Industry
An asterisk signifies that the entry was taken from the
report, "Recommendations as to Policy, Legislation and Methods
of Financing for the Preservation of the Water Supply Resources
of the State of Maryland," Water Resources Commission of
Maryland, January 1933.
Entries other than municipalities are followed by the
nearest municipality with counties enclosed in parentheses.
County - State
The county in which the water use occurs is given, even
though the nearest municipality may be in another county.
River Mile
Miles to Mouth, "Potomac," signifies that the distance
is measured from the location to the mouth of the Potomac River
at Chesapeake Bay, while Miles to Mouth, 'tributary" signifies
that the distance Is measured from the location to the junction
of the tributary streams with the Potomac River.
xli
-------
COMPILATION OF EXISTING DATA ON
WATER USES AND QUALITY
I. Sub-basin
A. Municipality or Industry
1. Location
a. County
b. State
c. River Mile
2. Population or number of employees
3. Water
a. Source of supply
b. Quantity used or population served
c. Use
d. Treatment
U. Wastes
a. Type
b. Quantity
c. BOD (population equivalent)
d. Treatment
e. Receiving stream
5. Water quality data available
-------
xlii
Population or Employees
Populations were taken from the 1950 Census unless more
recent data were available.
WATER SUPPLY
Population Served
An asterisk signifies that the entry is the design
population and the population served is unknown.
Quantity Used
An asterisk signifies that the entry is the design flow
and the actual quantity used is unknown.
Use of Water
For municipalities it is assumed that the use of water
is for domestic purposes, along with possible industrial uses,
and no entry is made.
Treatment
See Key to Symbols.
WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Discharged
An asterisk signifies that the entry is the design flow
and the actual quantity discharged is unknown.
-------
xiv
Population Equivalent BOD Discharged
It is assumed that 0.17 pounds of 5-day 20°C. biochemical
oxygen demand (BOD) constitutes one population equivalent.
Treatment
See Key to Symbols.
Population Served (Sewerage)
An asterisk signifies that the entry is the design
population and the population served is unknown.
-------
KEY TO SYMBOIS
Water Supply - Treatment
Type of Plant - P - Purification
H - Softening
I - Iron or Manganese removal
D - Disinfection
Treatment or Device - A - Aeration
Ac . . contact beds or trays, coke or
other material
Am . . patented aerator
As . . spray aerator
At . . overflow trays cascade or other
splashaerator
Ao . . other type aerator
C - Chemical dosage for coagulation or softening
Ca , . alum
Ci . . iron salts
Cl . . lime
Cs . soda ash
Ct . . activated silica
Co . . other coagulant
D - Disinfection
DC . . chlorine gas
Dd . . dechlorination
Dh . . hypochlorites
Ds . . free residual chlorine
Dx . . chlorine dioxide
Dz . . ozone
Do . . other means
xv
-------
xvi
P - Filters
Fa . anthrafilt
Fc . . roughing or contact
Fd . . Diatomaceous earth
Fg . . gravity (slow)
Fp . . pressure
Fr . . gravity (rapid)
Fs . sand
Fz . . zeolite
K - Chemical dosage for corrosion correction or
water stabilization
Kc . . phosphate compounds
Kg . . chlorine gas
Kh . . hypochlorlte
Kb . . sodium silicate
Kp . . alkali feed for pH adjustment
M - Mixing device or tank
Ma . . air agitation
Mb . . baffle mix
Mh . . hydraulic (standing wave flume)
Mi . . injection or pump suction application
Mp . . slow mechanical mix
Ms . . patented sludge blanket
Mt . . rapid mechanical mix
(MtpsSv) "Liquon Sludge Contact Reactor";
"Accelator"; "Precipitator"
N - Ammoniation
Nc . . ammonium compound
Ng . . ammonia gas
R - Recarbonatlon
S - Sedimentation
Sb . . baffled basins (other than inlet or
outlet baffles)
Sc . . covered basins (other than housed)
Sm . . mechanical sludge removal
So . . open basin (may be inside plant
building)
-------
xvii
S - Sedimentation (continued)
Sv . .up and flow cylindrical tanks
(MtpsSv) "liquon Reactor"; "Accelator";
"Precipitator"
T - Chemical taste and odor control
Tc . . activated carbon
Td . . chlorine dioxide
Ts . . sulfur dioxide
Tz . . ozone
To . . other
V - Fluoride adjustment
Va . . hydrofluosilicic acid
Vs . . sodium silicofluoride
Vt . . sodium fluoride
Vo . . other fluorides
Ve . . ammonium silicofluoride
natural fluorides
-------
xvili
Waste Discharge - Treatment
The principal treatment devices and methods are identified by
capital letters and are further described by the subsequent lower case
letters. In general, the symbols will be arranged in the order of
sewage flow, with sludge treatment symbols following thereafter.
Combination units performing more than one function in a single structure
are denoted by enclosing the appropriate symbols in parantheses.
Enclosures in brackets indicate parallel or alternate operation.
Chlorination, where used, is noted only once for each plant, whether or
not actual application is made at more than one point.
A Aeration
Aa Activated sludge, diffused air aeration
Ac -- Contact aerators
Am -- Activated sludge, mechanical aeration
Ap Aeration, plain, without sludge return
B Sludge beds
Bo Open
Be Glass covered
C Settling tanks
Ci -- two story (Imhoff)
Cm mechanically equipped
Cp -- plain, hopper bottom or intermittently drained for
cleaning
Cs septic tank
Ct multiple tray, mechanically equipped
D Digester, separate sludge
DC with cover (fixed if not otherwise specified)
D(eg)-gasometer in fixed cover
De gas used in engines (heat usually recovered)
Df with floating cover
Dg with gasometer cover
Dh gas used in heating
Dm stirring mechanism
Do open top
Dp unheated
Dr heated
Ds gas storage in separate holder
Dt stage digestion
-------
xix
E Chlorination
EC with contact tank
Eg by chlorine gas
Eh by hypochlorite
P Filters
Fc contact beds
Fm magnetite (straining)
Fo roughing filters
Fr rapid sand or other sand straining
Fs intermittent sand
Ft trickling (no further details)
Fth - high capacity
Ftlh- high capacity, single stage
Ft2h- high capacity, two stage
Ftn - fixed nozzle, standard capacity
Ftr - rotary distributor, standard capacity
Ftt - traveling distributor, standard capacity
G ----- Grit chambers
Gh without continuous removal mechanism
dm with continuous removal mechanism
Gp grit pocket at screen chamber
Gv separate grit washing device
H Sludge storage tanks (not second stage digestion units)
He covered
Hm with stirring or concentrating mechanism
Ho open
I Sewage application to land
Ic with cropping
Ip percolation beds
Is sub-surface application
Iu land underdrained
K Chemical treatment - Flocculation. Chemical treatment-type
units or equipment not necessarily complete or operated as
chemical treatment
Ka flocculation tank, air agitation
Kc chemicals used
Km flocculation tank, mechanical agitation
Kx -- no chemicals used
-------
XX
L Lagoons
Le evaporation lagoons
Lo -- oxidation lagoons or ponds
Lp lagoon for settling of sewage
Ls sludge lagoons - not for treatment of sewage
0 Grease removal or skimming tanks - not Incidental
to settling tanks
Oa -- aerated tank (diffused air)
Om mechanically equipped tank
S Screens
Sc comminutor (screenings ground in sewage stream)
Si intermediate screens (1/8" to 1/2" openings)
Sf fine screen (less than 1/8" openings)
Sg screenings ground in separate grinder and returned
to sewage flow
Sh « bar rack (1/2" to 2" openings) hand cleaned
Sm bar rack (1/2" to 2" openings) mechanically cleaned
Sr coarse rank (openings over 2")
St garbage ground at plant and added to sewage flow
T Sludge thickener
Tc covered
Tm stirring mechanism
To open top
V Mechanical sludge dewatering
Vc sludge centrifuge
Vv rotary vacuum filter
Vo other
X Sludge disposal
Xb '-- barged to sea
Xd used for fertilizer
Xf burned for fuel
Xn incinerated
Xp used for fill
-------
xxi
. Sludge conditioning
Za chemicals used, alum
Zc -- chemicals used (unidentified)
Zi chemicals used, iron salt
Zl chemicals used,
Zx -- no chemicals used
Zy elutriatlon
-------
INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT OPERATIONS AND PROCESSES
The following numerical coding Is used for the description
of those situations In which the treatment of Industrial wastes
cannot be satisfactorily or fully described by use of the foregoing
symbols alone. The preceding letter symbols and the following
numerical coding are used in combination when necessary, although
either may be used alone.
1. Centrifugation
Defn. Separation of solids and fluids of different densities
or separation of the nature of filtration in an apparatus
rotating at high speed.
Ex. Separation of wool grease from acid cracked wool scouring
liquor in a centrifuge.
2. Distillation and Stripping
Defn. Distillation is a separation of volatile liquids by
utilizing the differences in their volatilities.
Stripping is a separation of a volatile material from a
less volatile or non-volatile liquid with the aid of a
stream of air or other gas.
Ex. Kopper's process for distilling phenol from ammonia-still
liquor. _,.
xxii
-------
xxLii
3» Emulsion Breaking
Defn. Separation of two liquids in colloidal suspension.
Ex. Passing oil in water of waste emulsion from the treat-
ment of light and lubricating oils between electrodes to
charge the particles and cause separation.
k» Evaporation
Defn. Volatilization of water or other material from non-
volatile residue.
Ex. Concentration of Steffens waste from beet sugar manu-
facture in multiple effect evaporators.
5. Extraction
Defn. Transferral of a constituent of a solid or liquid to
another liquid (the solvent).
Ex. Extraction of phenol from ammonlacal liquor with benzene.
6. Filtration
Defn. Separation of a heterogeneous mixture of a fluid and
particles of solid by a filter medium which permits the
flow of a fluid but retains the particles of solid.
Ex. Use of save-alls for the removal of fiber from white
water in the pulp and paper industry. Filter presses
for removal of lanolin from wool scouring wastes.
-------
xxiv
7. Flotation
Defn. Separation of a material by floating at or on the surface
of a liquid.
Ex. Flotation save-alls for removal of fiber and other
suspended solids from white water.
8. Neutralization
Defn. Addition of acids or bases to basic or acidic material
so that it Is no longer acidic or basic, to get a pH
value of about 7-0.
Ex. Neutralization of acid wastes resulting from the manu-
facture of nitro-cellulose with dolomitic lime.
9. Oxidation - Chemical
Defn. Changing an element from a lower to a higher positive
valance by chemical action.
Ex. Chlorination of cyanides in alkaline solution.
10. Regulated Discharge
Defn. The procedure or actions involved in artificially
controlling the flow of liquid wastes so that their dis-
charge at a specific time or times will serve a
specified purpose or objective.
Ex. Lagooning of cannery wastes, with discharge to the stream
in small volumes over long periods of time when tempera-
tures are low and stream flows high.
-------
XXV
11. Waste Prevention Measures
Satisfactory efforts by industry to prevent waste
materials resulting from industrial operations from
entering the sewers.
This group also includes efforts by industries
not sewered, to prevent waste materials from entering
a watercourse by other means.
Practices of disposal other than those
described by codes, are included in this group.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Same and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Potomac River
North Branch
* Davis Coal & Coke Co..
Kempton, Md. ( Garret t)
Buffalo Creek, Md.
\
. [, ' Fairfax Coal Washery,
Bayard, W. Va. (Grant)
Savage River, Md.
Frootburg, Md. (Allegany)
Luke, Md. (Allegany)
West Virginia Pulp &
Paper Co.
Piedmont, W. Va. (Mineral)
Oeorges Creek, Md.
Borden Shaft, Md.
(Allegany)
* Consolidation Coal Co.,
Lord, Md. (Allegany)
Midland, Md. (Allegany)
Lonaconlng, Md. (Allegany)
Barton, Md. (Allegany)
Westernport, Md. (Allegany)
New Creek, W. Va.
Keyser, W. Va. (Mineral)
Royal Dairy Co.
Mason Dairy,
Cresaptown, Md. (Allegany)
Cellanese Corp. of America,
Amcelle, Md. (Allegany)
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
285
87
5"
6,876
53 820
53 1,657
51 2,565
51
192
60
889
2,289
695
51 3,^31
U6
1*6 6,3VT
1*6
27
Source of Oupply
N. Br. Potomac R.
Savage R., Piney Cr.
Wells and Springs
W. Va. Pulp &
Paper Co.
(from N. Br. )
H. Br., Potomac R.
and Savage R.
(Supplement to
N. Br. Potomac R. )
Savage R.
Staubs Run of
Georges Cr.
Georges Cr.
Lonaconlng, Md .
Jackson Run,
Elklick Run,
Koontz Run, of
Georges Cr.
Wells; Bartlett
Run of Georges Cr.
Savage R.
Springs and Rev Cr.
N. Br., Potomac R.
Population
Served
f
2,700
7,000
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
, .SUPPLY WASTE DISCHARGE
quantity Use
Used of Treat-
gpd(lO-3) Vater ment
125
FKNDc
AFKDc
1*0,000 F,
Chemi-
cal
325 CSFD
Rone
5
DC,
Dh,
Dh
Dh;
Dh
FKDc
JOO SFD
1)0,000 Cooling 8
water
Quantity Population
Type Discharged Served
Waste pad (10-3) (Sewerage)
Coal
Washing
5,000
900
Magazine 1*0,000
newsprint
production
2,UOO
620
1,880
U8o
3,500
M50
Dairy-
Cellulose 3,600
acetate
fiber manu-
facture
Pop. Equlv.
BOD Treat -
Discharged ment
So
900 None
300,000 ScCm
BoXp,
11
None
3,500 None
None
Rone
11
59,000 11
Receiving Stream
Buffalo Cr. of
N. Br., Potomac R.
Georges Cr. and
Jennings Run
N. Br., Potomac R.
N. Br., Potomac R.
N. Br. , Potomac R.
Georges Cr.
Georges Cr.
Georges Cr.
N. Br., Potomac R.
N. Br. , Potomac R.
Unnamed trlb. of
N. Br., Potomac R.
N. Br., Potomac R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Enployees
Potomac River
North Branch (continued) 285
Potomac Edison Power Co., 27
Amcelle, Md. (Allegany)
Wills Creek, Md. 22
Hyndman, Pa. (Bedford) 1,322
Cumberland Cement and
Sand Co., Cumberland, Md.
(Allegany)
"Cumberland Coal Co. 200
Barrellville, Md. (Allegany)
Cumberland, Md. (Allegany) 22 37,679
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. 600
Potomac Edison Power Co.
Potomac Edison Power Co.
Kelley Springfield Tire Co.
"Union Tanning Co.
Cumberland Laundry Co.
fl. & G. Taylor Co.
Rldgely, W. Va. (Mineral) 19 1,75^
Evitts Creek, Md.
Evltts Cr. Water Co., Pa.
(Bedford)
Koppers Co«> »
Green Spring, W. Va. (Banpshire) 2 135
Population
Source of Supply Served
N. Br. Potomac R.
Laurel Run of Little 1,350
Wills Cr. of Wills Cr.
Wills Cr.
Evltts Cr.
N. Br., Potomac R.
and Cumberland, Md.
N. Br., Potomac R.
N. Br. , Potomac R.
N. Br. , Potomac R.
Cumberland, Md. 1,972
Evltts Cr. 1*3,000
in Md.
(including
Cumberland)
15,000
in Pa.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Quantity
Used
gpd(lO-3)
100
5
12,500
2,000
1*3,200
28,800
10,000
to
15,000
*l8,000
SUPPLY
Use
Of Treat -
Water ment
Power plant
cooling water
(10,000 KW)
None
FDcN
Cooling DC
water
(30,000 kw)
Cooling
water
(9,000 kw)
Cooling None
water
CalTc
MbFa
DcVsNg
Type
Waste
Silt
Silt;
Sanitary
sewage
Cooling
water
Cooling
water
Cooling
water
WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Population Pop. Equlv.
Discharged Served BOD Treat -
gpd(lO-3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment Receiving Stream
1,322 None Little Wills Cr.
288 L Wills Cr.
1*5,000 1*5,000 SmGh N. Br., Potomac R.
Cmftn
crts
Bo
LjPrl. N. Br. , Potomac Ft.
for san.
sewage
None N. Br. , Potomac R.
None N. Br., Potomac R.
None N. Br., Potomac R.
119 N. Br. , Potomac R.
25 N. Br., Potomac R.
100 N. Br., Potomac R.
38 1,000 N. Br., Potomac R.
F N. Br., Potomac R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
HLlec from
Mouth
Population
or
WATER
Potomac Tributary Employees
Population
Source of S'jpply Served
Potomac River
South Branch, W. Va. 285
Franklin, W. Va. (Pendleton)
Petersburg, W. Va. (Grant)
Petersburg Tanning Co.
*Comnunity Power Co.
Moore field, W. Va. (Hardy)
Loewengart and Co.
Rocklngham Poultry Co.
Romney, W. Va. (Hampshire)
School for Deaf and Blind
Cacapon River, W. Va. 28o
Lost River State Park (Hardy)
'Northern Virginia Power Co.,
(Morgan)
Tonoloway Creek, Mel. 237
Cyrus S. Johnson Hydro-
electric plant, Pa. (Fulton)
Warm Springs Run, W. Va. 236
Berkeley Springs,. W. Va. (Morgan)
Aulabaugh Bros., Inc.
Pennsylvania Sand Glass Co.
69
57
777
1,898
125
2,059
50
1,199
225
Springs .600
S. Br., Potomac H. 2,000
and deep well
S. Br., Potomac R.
S. F. of S. Br., 1,500
Potomac R«
Moorefield, W. Va.
and springs
Moorefield, W. Va.
S. Br., Potomac R. 2,500
S. Br., Potomac R.
Cacapon R.
Trib. of Tonoloway Cr.
750
Well
Warm Springs Run
-------
POTOMAC FIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPPLY
Quantity Use
Used of Treat -
BPd(lO-3) water ment
50 D
200 Accelat
CFD
Hydro-
electric
plant
(565 HP)
UOO CSFD
100 Tanning
(city)
2
(springs)
100
to
170
150 CSFD
IfO FD
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1,120 HP)
Hydro-
electric
plant
185 D
18 Tomato None
(during canning
season)
1,1*50 Sand None
to washing
2,150
Quantity
Type Discharged
Waste gpd(lO-3)
or,
Tannery 100
Poultry 100
processing ho
170
Tomato waste 18
(during
season)
Inorganic 1,^50
to
2,150
WASTE DISCHARGE
Population Pop. Equiv.
Served BOD Treat -
(Sewerage) Discharged ment Receiving Stream
Pri. S. Br. , Potomac- R.
1,000 None S. Br. , Potomac R.
CLp S. Br., Potomac R.
950 S. Br. , Potomac R.
ScLX S. F. of S. Br.,
Potomac R.
3,11 S. F^ of S. Br.,
Potomac R.
1,800 360 ShCi Big Run of S. Br.,
FtnEcg Potomac R.
CpBo
780 Csle Cacapon R.
700 None Warm Springs Run
None Warm Springs Run
None Warm Springs Run
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Miles from Population
Name and location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Employees
Potomac River
Conococheague Creek, Md. 211
Scotland Orphanage, Pa.
(Franklin)
Chambersburg, Pa. (Franklin) 53 17,212
H. J. Heinz Co.
Chambersburg Steam Genera-
ting Plant
Greencastle, Pa. (Franklin) 32 2,66l
Greencastle Packing Co. It2
(1*60 at
peak)
Mercersburg, Pa. (Franklin) 1,613
Lowengart & Co. 2>»0
S. G. Dixon State TB Hospital,
Pa., (Franklin)
U. S. Paper Mills, Inc.,
Pa. (Franklin)
Path Valley Esso Service
Station, Pa. (Franklin)
W. D. Byron & Sons of Maryland, Inc., 160
Williamsport, Md. (Washington)
Kemps Mill Tavern,
Williamsport, Md. (Washington)
Source of Supply
Burgner Springs of
Little Antletam Cr.
Hoosic Run &
Birch Run of
Conococheague Cr.
Chambersburg, Pa.
Conococheague Cr.
Springs
Greencastle, Pa.
Drilled well, spring,
and Buck Run of W. Br
of Conococheague Cr.
Wells and
Mercersburg, Pa.
Population
Served
850
18,500
2,800
2,500
Springs and'w. Br. of 1,700
Antletam Cr.
E. Br. of
Conococheague Cr.
Drilled wells
Conococheague Cr.
and springs
20
to 30
80
(creek)
160
(springe)
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPPLY
Quantity
Used of Treat -
gpd(lQ-3) Water meat
WASTE DISCHARGE
~~QuantityPopulationPop. Equiv.~
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waste gpd(lO"3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment Receiving Stream
100
3,000
DC
DcKp
100
1,500 18,500
500 Canning
2,500 Cooling
water for
power
generation
Vegetable
canning
500
U80
12 Frozen
foods
220
Dh
3,500
Potato waste
12
Dh
185 2,»»00
220 Tanning None
ClDc
Paper None
Dh
Tanning, Rone
cooling
Tannery
220
300 1,700
Shower water
Tannery
20
to 30
55
100
5,150
CiFtn
CpEgc
Bo
ScAp
GhCm
Ft2hCm
EcgDch
mrDftBc
Silc
Conococheague Cr.
Conococheague Cr.
East Br. of
Conococheague Cr.
ScCinFt Unnamed Run of
UhCmEgc Conococheague Cr.
r>chn"-Bo
Silc
None
ScCm Steiger Run of
Ftlh W. Br. of
CmEgc Conococheague Cr.
DchmPBo
CniLo Steiger Run of
Ls W. Br. of
Conococheague Cr.
ScCm RocRy Mountain
Dchrt Run of
AmCm Conococheague Cr.
EgBc
11 E. Br. of
Conococheague Cr.
ScCim Unnamed Cr. of
Ft2h W. Br. of
EchBc Conococheague Cr.
8,000 ScpL Conococheague Cr.
None Conococheague Cr.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
WAXER
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Population
Source of Supply Served
Potomac River
Opequon Creek, Md.
Winchester, Va. (Frederick)
0' Sullivan Rubber Co.
American Brakeahoe Co.
Virginia Woolen Mills
Winchester Woolen Mills
*Shenandoah Box Board Co.
Virginia Woolen Co.,
Middlevay, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Invood, W. Va. (Berkeley)
Musselman Canning Co.
Martlnsburg, W. Va. (Berkeley)
Rational Fruit Products Co.
Standard
and Stone Co.
Blair Limestone Co.,
Blairton, W. Va. (Berkeley)
Antietam Creek, Md.
Fayetteville, Pa. (Franklin)
Mont Alto, Pa. (Franklin)
X.U.B. Orphanage, Pa. (Franklin)
Waynesboro, Pa. (Franklin)
Camp Ritchie (U.S. Any.), Md.,
(Washington)
Potomac Edison Co.,
Security, Md. (Washington)
202
l8o
29
12,095
500
15,621
600
810
984
10,33*
N. F., Shenandoah R. 16,000
Abrams Cr. of
Opequon Cr.
Springs
Wells
Springs
Springs
Cold Spring Run of
Little Antietam Cr.
Pearl of the Park
Spring of Rattle-
snake Cr.
Drilled well
UOO
18,000
3,000
990
220
Little Antietam Cr., 9,800
Rattlesnake Cr.
Antietam Cr.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPPLY
QuantityUse"
Used of Treat-
gpd(lQ-3) Water ment
WASTE DISCHARGE
QuantityPopulation Pop. Equlv.~~
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat -
Waste gpd(K)"3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment Receiving Stream
2,810
21
3,000
65
50
13
2,020
DC
DV
Dh
Dh
Dh
DcNg
18,000
800
350
10,500*
Ifl,600 Cooling Hone
water
for power
generation
Ply ash
Prl.,
Sec.,
E
Prl.,
E
Prl.,
Sec.
Com-
plete
9,000 L
12,000 ShCl
Ftn
CpBo
SP
Abrams Cr. of
Qpequon Cr.
Abrams Cr. of
Opequon Cr.
Abrams Cr. of
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Opequon Cr.
Tuscarora Cr.
Potomac R.
Tuscarora Cr. of
Opequon Cr.
Set- Opequon Cr.
tllng
On lot disposal
On lot disposal
ShCi Little Antletam
Ftn Cr.
CpEhBo
SmCm E. Br. of Little
Ptr Antletam Cr.
CpEBo
Antletam Cr.
Marsh Run of
Antletam Cr.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Employees
Potomac River
Antietam Creek, Md. (continued) ISO
North American Cement Co..
Security, Md. (Washington)
Hagerstown, Md. (Washington) 2k 36,260
Western Maryland Railroad Co. 2,000
Falrchlld Aircraft Co. 6,000
to
9,000
k
Municipal Electric Light Plant
"Maryland State Penal Farm, 75
Roxbury, Md. (Washington)
Maryland State Reformatory 1(00
for Males,
Breathedsville, Md. (Washington)
Boonsboro, Md. (Washington)
Mullendore Slaughter House
"Maryland Light & Power Co.
Sbenandoah River, W. Va. 171
North Fork, Va. 55
Broadway, Va. (Rocklngham) 561
Population
Source of Supply Served
Antietam Ct.
Raven Rock & Warner 41,000
Gapj Potomac R.
Hagerstown, Pa.
Antietam Cr.
Springs 1,500
Antietam Cr.
N. F., Shenandoah R. 600
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Quantity
Used of Treat-
gpd(lO-3) Water meat
WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Population Pop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waste gpd(lO"3) (Sewerage) Discharged meat Receiving Stream
16,600
6,500
Cooling
water
for power
generation
fly ash
DcNKV;
PKDcV
Wash
water
630 Domestic
and
chrome
plating
Wash water
& decreasing
Domestic and
chrome
plating
1,580
Cooling None
water
for power
generation
50
Floor
wash
Hydro-
elec.
plant
(360 HP)
Slaughter-
house floor
washings
Ikk
FD
*6,000 33,000
375
165
(Domestic)
(Plant)
1(00
None
Antletam Cr.
5,700 SnGh Antletam Cr.
CmAa
Cmlta
crts
ZyVvBo
7,8
Antletam Cr.
ScCf Marsh Run of
trCm Antletam Cr.
FsEg
DfhBo
None
None Antletam Cr.
CD
Antietam Cr.
260 SmCm Antletam Cr.
FtrCm
DmopBo
Ills Unnamed trlb. of
Little Antletorr.
Cr.
Unvllle Cr. of
N.F.^ Shenandoah
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Employees
Potomac River
Shenandoah River, W. Va. 171
North Fork, Va. (continued) 55
Timberville, Va. (Rockingham) 271
Virginia Public Service Co.
Food Processors Water
Cooperative
Valley Housing Corporation,
Va. (Rockingham)
New Market, Va. (Shenandoah) 701
"Virginia Public Service Co.
Orkney Springs, Va. (Shenandoah)
Mount Jackson, Va. (Shenandoah) 732
Edinburg, Va. (Shenandoah) 533
Virginia Public Service Co.
Woodstock, Va. (Shenandoah) 1,616
"Virginia Public Service Co.
Strasburg, Va. (Shenandoah) 2,022
Winchester, Va. (Frederick) 12,095
South Fork 55
Waynesboro, Va. (Augusta) 12,357
Crompton Shenandoah Co.
Population
Source of Supply Served
N. F., Shenandoah R.
N. F., Shenandoah R.
N. F., Shenandoah R.
Smith Cr. of N. F., 1,000
Shenandoah R.
N. F., Shenandoah R.
Trib. of N. F., 800
Shenandoah R.
N. F., Shenandoah R.
N. F., Shenandoah R.
N. F., Shenandoah R. 2,000
N. F., Shenandoah R. 16,000
Springs
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPPLY
Quantity UBB
Used of Treat-
gpd (30-31 water neat
__ WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Population Pop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waate gpd(lO"3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment Receiving Stream
15
Hydro-
electric
plant
(110 HP)
500
FD
300
120
1,500 Cooling
water for
steam power
81
60
Hydro-
electric
plant
(220 HP)
Hydro-
electric
plant
(360
182
200
2,610
1,U10
DC
20,000
2,200
None N.F., Shenandoah
Pri., N.F., Shenandoah
E.
None Smith Cr. of
N.F., Shenandoah
Pri. Stoney Cr. of
N.F., Shenandoah
None Mill Cr. of
N.F., Shenandoah
None Trlb. of
N.F., Shenandoah
None N.F., Shenandoah
None N.F., Shenandoah
Pri., Abrams Cr. of
Sec., Opequon Cr.
«i
South R. of
S.F., Shenandoah
S.F., Shenandoah
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Potomac River
Shenandoah River. W. Va.
South Fork
Waynesboro, Va. (Augusta)
(continued)
E. I. dePont de Nemours
and Co., Inc.
"Edison General Electric Co.
Stehlis Silk Mills
Staunton, Va. (Augusta)
American Safety Razor Co.,
Verona, Va. (Augusta)
Western State Hospital,
Va. (Augusta)
Woodrov Wilson School,
Va. (Augusta)
Skyland-Svannanoa, Va.
(Augusta)
Greenville State Welfare Camp,
Va. (Augusta)
Verona Sanitary District,
Va. (Augusta)
Brldgevater, Va. (Rocklngbam)
*North River Electric Co.
Dayton, Vni (Pfv*lr' «£*« )
Virginia Public Service Co.,
Grottoes, Va. (Rocklngbaa)
Barrlsonburg, Va. (Rocklngbam)
#Harrlsonburg Hydrotelectric
Plant, Va. (Rockingham)
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
171
55
19,927
1,537
788
10,810
Population
Source of Supply Served
Mountain Stream of 23,000
North R. and spring
Middle R. of 1,200
S. F., Shenandoah
Springs
S. f't ShenAndcu^
Spring
S. F. , Shenandoah
Subterranean dam
on Dry R. basin
S. F., RVioTifjn^fmh
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPfLY
Quantity Use
Used of Treat-
gp(j(lQ-3) water meat
WASTE DISCHARGE
Type
Waste
Quantity
Discharged
gpd(lO-3)
Population
Served
(Sewerage)
Pop. Equlv.
BOD
Discharged
Treat-
Bent
Receiving Stream
9,800
2,000
1UU
SP
CP
15,000
1,500
250
150
1,500
110
ito
Hydro-
electric
plant
(163 HP)
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1*20 HP)
135
10,000
Hydro-
electric
plant
S.F., Shenandoah
S.F., Shenandoah
S.F., Shenandoah
Prl., Lewis Cr. of
E S.F., Shenandoah
Prl., Christians Cr. of
Sec., S. F., Shenandoah
E
Prl., Christians Cr. of
E S.F., Shenandoah
Prl., Trlb. of South R.
Sec., of S.F.,
E Shenandoah
Prl., South R. of
Sec. S.F., Shenandoah
Prl., Middle R. of
E S.F., Shenandoah
None S.F*., Shenandoah
None S.F., Shenandoah
Prl. Blacks Run of
S.F., Shenandoah
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Mile* frcn Population
HUH and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Eqployees
Potoaac River
Shenandoah River, W. Va. 171
South Fork (continued) 55
South River Sanitary
District, Va. (Augusta)
Elkton, Va. (Roakingham) 55,8* 1,36!
Merck a Co.
Shenandoah, Va. (Fags) 1,903
Potcamc Edison Co.
Norfolk a Wertern Railroad
Massanutten Fewer Corp.
Stanley, Va. (Page) 399
Potcewc Edison Co.
Luray, Va. (Page) 55,"»9 2,731
Potoaao Edison Co.
*Page Power Co.
Stauffer Chexlcal Co.,
Bentonville, Va. (Warren)
Front Royal, Va. (Warren) 55,4 8,115
Viscose City
American Viscose Corp.
Source of Supply
Coles Run and
Kennedy Run
Spring
S. P., Shenandoah
8. F. , Shenandoah
S. F. , Shenandoah
S. F., Shenandoah
S. F. , Shenandoah
Stoney Man Cr. , Mary
Rock Cr., Springs
S. P., Shenandoah
S. F. , Shenandoah
S. P., Shenandoah
S. P., Shenandoah
Population
Served
3,500
2,000
9,000
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Quantity
0«ed of Treat-
gpd(10-3) wetter neat
WASTE DISCHARGE
~~QuantityPopulationPop. Equlv.~
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat -
Waste gpd(lQ-3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment Receiving Stream
Hydro- None
electric
plant
(862 KW)
1,000 FD
Hydro-
electric
plant
HP)
Hydro- None
electric
plant
(1,1*00 KW)
273
Hydro- Rone
electric
plant
.(1,600 KW)
Hydro-
electric
plant
(2,550 HP)
861 CF
In- CT
dustrlal
200
710
3,350
8,500
1
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Potomac River
Shenandoah River, W. Va.
South Fork
Front Royal, Va. (Warren)
(continued)
Beef Cattle Research
*Warren Power Co.
Potomac Edison Co.,
Rlverton, Va. (Warren)
Northern Virginia Power Co.,
Riverton, Va. (Warren)
Potomac Edison Co.
Cedarville, Va. (Warren)
Berryvllle, Va. (Clark)
Charles Town, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Halltovn, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Valley Paper Board Co.
"Northern Virginia Power Co.,
Hillvllle, W. Va. (Jefferson)
WATER
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
171
55
1,1*01
3,035
U 300
160
Michigan Limestone Division,
U.S. Steel, Millville, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Blair Limestone Division,
Millville, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Potomac Edison Co.,
Millville, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Potomac Edison Co.,
Millville, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Source of Supply
Springs and wells
S. F. , Shenandoah
Shenandoah R.
Shenandoah R.
Shenandoah R.
Mountain watershed
Springs
Springs
Shenandoah R.
Shenandoah R.
Springs
Shenandoah R.
Shenandoah R.
Population
Served
30
^,500
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
10
SUPPLY
,.
gpd(JO-3) Wat*..
Treat-
~QuantityPopulationPop. Equlv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waste gpd(lQ-3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment Re
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1,200 HP)
1*3,200 Power
station
cooling water
(3^,500 KW)
CF
Hydro-
electric
plant
(750 KW)
1*50
2,225 Paper Skp
boxboard
Hydro-
electric
plant
(l,8JiO HP)
(cooling water)
50
Prl., Happy Cr. of
Sec. S.F., Shenandoah
Pri.,
E
1,500
1,500
900
ShCi
Bo
2,225
1,535 Sand Rone
washing
2,160 Sand None
washing
21,600 Power None
station
cooling water
(8,700 KW)
Hydro- None
electric
flant
2,81iO KW)
Inorganic
Inorganic
Pond
seepage
None
Lc
Shenandoah R.
Town Run Cr. of
Shenandoah R.
Evitts Run of
Shenandoah R.
Shenandoah R.
Flowing springs
of Shenandoah R.
Shenandoah R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Employees
Potomac River
Monocacy River, Md. 153
Gettysburg, Pa. (Adams) 7,0^6
littlestown, Pa. (Adams) 2,850
Fairfield, Pa. (Adams) ^51
Camp Rltchey Project,
U.S. Army, Pa. (Adams)
Funkhouser Co., Pa. (Adams) 76
Knouse Food Corp., 20°
Ortana, Pa. (Adams) (at peak)
B. H. Shriver Co., ^
Pa. (Adams)
A. W. Feeser Co., Inc.,
Silver Run, Md. (Carroll)
Taneytown, Md. (Carroll) 1,^20
Cambridge Rubber Co.
Essig Packing Co.
B. J. Nusbaum Co. ^
A. W. Feeser Co., Inc.
Westminster, Md. (Carroll) 6,lto
Source of Supply
Well and Marsh Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Springs and wells
Maple Spring Run
of Monocacy R.
Miney Br. of Toms Cr
of Monocacy R.
Wells and Marsh Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Piney Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Wells
Hull Cr. and
Cranberry Br. of
N. Br. Patapsco R.
Population
Served
8,500
3,000
k28
m
1,800
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
11
SUPPLY
Quantity ^Ose "
Uwd of Treat-
gya(lO-3) water Bent
WASTE DISCHARGE
Type
Waste
QuantityPopulationPop. EqulTI
Discharged Served BOD Treat-
gpd(lO-3) (Sewerage) Discharged «ent
Receiving Stream
560
150
10
CalMb
FrPzDc
Dhc
Dh
5OO
106
100
83
200
Dh
FKHDc
7,500
2,850
220
1,100
to
2,200
Silt
Vege-
table
Oil, cool-
Ing water,
septic tank
eff., boiler
Chicken killing:
feathers, blood,
solids
Vegetable
canning, cooling.
water
Vegetable
35
200
1*8
12
50
35
1,800
!*,692
Wo
GhSc Rock Cr. of
CmFt2h Monocacy P.
CmEgc
DchrBc
ShOn Fox Cr. of
FtlhCm Monocacy R.
EcgDf
hrToBo
On lot disposal
ShCl
FtnCp
EcgBo
Silt
La-
goons
630
SfL,
10
ScCi
Ftrh
CB
EgcBo
CO
n,
SCs
Sf
STL,
10
ShCB
Ptr
CBD*
crBo
Mlney Br. of
Toms Cr. of
Monocacy R.
MLney Br. of
Toms Cr. of
Monocacy R.
No discharge
Ho discharge
Pipe Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Piney Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Plaey Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Plney Cr. at
Nonocacy R.
Plney Cr. at
Honocacy R.
Plaey Cr. at
Monocacy R.
Little Pipe Cr.
of Monocacy H.
-------
POTOM/VC RIVER R/VSIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Employees
Potomac River
Monocacy River, Md. 153
Westminster, Md. (Carroll)
(continued)
Mount Pleasant Canning Co.
Willow Farm Dairy
Western Maryland Dairy,
New Windsor, Md. (Carroll)
New Windsor Farmers' Cooperative,
New Windsor, Md. (Carroll)
Joseph H. Weller Co.,
Idnwood, Md. (Carroll)
Tingling Brothers Co.,
Union Bridge, Md. (Carroll)
A. W. Feeser Co., Inc., J*0
Keymar, Md. (Carroll)
George W. Magin Co.,
Taylorsville, Md. (Carroll)
Western Maryland Dairy, 25
Detour, Md. (Carroll)
"Maryland TB Sanltorlum, Md.
(Frederick)
Emmitsburg, Md. (Frederick) 1,300
St. Mary's College 600
»St. Joseph's Academy
Thurmont, Md, (Frederick) 1,6?6
Thurmont Rendering Co.
Howard Lotte & Co. 10
Fraley's Meats. Catoctin Furnace,
Md. (Frederick)
Population
Source of Supply Served
Wells and spring;
Owens Cr. of Monocacy R.
Turkey Br. and springs 1,300
High Run, wells, 2,500
springs
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
12
SUPPLY WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Use
Used of Treat-
gpd(10-3) Water ment
88
200 DC
500 Dh
Quantity Population Pop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD
Waste gpd(lO~3) (Sewerage) Discharged
Vegetable 30
canning
Milk process 1*0
wash water
Milk process 30 23
wash water
Cooling water 15
Vegetable 15
canning
Slaughter 10
house
Vegetable 60 3,000
canning
Cooling water 20
Milk process 125 625
wash water
88 600
1,050 700
600 too
100 !*OO
500 2,500
Animal
rendering
Slaughter 2,000
house
Slaughter Variable 1»0°°
house
Treat-
ment
CSf
11
11
None
11
8,11
SfL
0
ll,Cs
Slo
CiEgc
Bo
ShOCl
EgBo
ShKCm
Ft Cm
EgcDo
Csls
11, S
Muni-
cipal
sewer
Sf,ll
Receiving Stream
Monocacy R.
Meadow Br. of
Monocacy R.
Little Pipe Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Little Pipe Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Little Pipe Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Little Pipe Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Pipe Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Talbot Br. of
Monocacy R.
Double Pipe Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Owens Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Flat Run of
Monocacy R.
Trib. of Toms Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Monocacy R.
Hunting Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Little Hunting Cr.
of Monocacy R.
Big Hunting Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Little Hunting Cr.
of Monocacy R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality Potomac Tributary Employees
Potomac River
Monocacy River, Md. (continued) 153
Castle Cheese Co.,
Slxe Bridge, Md. (Frederick)
Walkersville, Md. (Frederick) 2U ?6l
Western Maryland Dairy,
Unionville, Md. (Frederick)
Frederick, Md. (Frederick) 19 lfl,lU2
Everedy Co. 225
Camp Dietrick, U. 3. Army
Headquarters, Camp Dietrlck,
U. S. Army (Experimental Station)
Eberts Ice Cream
Tydol Service Station
Alpha Portland Cement Co..
Lime Kiln, Md. (Frederick)
Hardy and Green Co.,
Kemptovn, Md. (Montgomery)
Mount Airy Motors,
Mount Airy, Md. (Frederick)
Western Maryland Dairy,
Mount Airy, Md. (Frederick)
George McComas & Co.,
Population
Source of Supply Served
Wells, springs, stream
Fishing Cr. and 19,990
Tuscarora Cr;
Llngamore Cr. , all of
Monocacy R.
Frederick, Md.
Monocacy R.;
Frederick, Md.
Monocacy R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASBI STUDIES
13
SUPPLY
quantity Use
Used of Treat -
pxJdO-3) water ment
Dh
2,600 DcNV
150 Plating
PIDc
Type
Waste
Cottage
cheese &
butter
process
Milk process
wash water
Chrome
Cooling water
Ice cream
process wash
water
Auto service
station
Wormseed oil
and cooling
water
Auto service
station
Milk process
wash water
Corn canning
Quantity Population
Discharged Served
gpd(lQ-3) (Sewerage)
8
(once
a
week)
36
2,800 19,000
150
Variable
for 3-hr.
discharge
per day
30
11
2U
Pop. Equlv.
BOD Treat -
Discharged ment
369 Csl
180 11
2U,OOO ScCm
Ftlh
CmKg
HoVvXn
11
ShCm
Ftr
CpEgDo
pmBo
0
Cs
11
2,L
11
11
Sf,I
Receiving Stream
Monocacy R.
Monocacy R.
N.F. of Llngamore
Cr.of Monocacy R.
Monocacy R.
Carroll Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Monocacy R.
Carroll Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Unnamed small
springhead of
Monocacy R.
Carroll Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Fahrney Br. of
Monocacy R.
Wood vl lie Br. of
Llngamore Cr. of
Monocacy R.
Little Llngamore
Cr. of Monocacy R
Bush Cr. of
Monocacy R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
Population
Source of Supply Served
Potomac River
Goose Creek, Va.
Middleburg, Va. (Loudoun)
Middleburg Training Center
Purcellville, Va. (Loudoun)
Leesburg, Va. (Loudoun)
*Virginia Public Service Co.
Leesburg Motel
Goose Cr. Country Club Swimming
Pool, Va. (Loudoun)
Foxcroft School, Va. (Loudoun)
Muddy Branch, Md.
Washington Suburban Sanitary
District, Galthersburg, Md.,
(Montgomery)
Cabin John Creek, Md.
Rockville, Md. (Montgomery)
Anacostla River
Contee Sand & Gravel Co.,
Laurel, Md. (Prince Georges)
Prince Georges Sand and
Gravel Co.,
Contee, Md. (Prince Georges)
Mineral Figment Corp.,
Mulrkirk, Md. (Prince Georges)
132
llB
108
663
Surface
1,703
Surface
Spring and well
Goose Creek.
Wells
17,000
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
1U
SUPPIff
Quantity vSe~
Used of Treat-
Bpd(lO-3) Water meat
WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Population Pop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waste gpd(lO"3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment
Receiving Stream
500
200
*20
800
2,000
Hydro-
electric
plant
(800 HP)
*300
195
2,270
Silt and
clay
Silt and
clay
Inorganic
pigments
800
500
20
Pri., Wagwipin Run
See.,E
Pri., Goose Cr.
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.
Goose Cr.
Pri., Goose Cr.
Sec.,E
Pri., Tuscarara Cr.
Sec.,E of Goose Cr.
Pri., Tuscarara Cr.
Sec.,E of Goose Cr.
Pri.,
Sec.
Goose Cr.
Pri., Goose Cr.
Sec.,E
ShKCi Muddy Br. of
FthCi Potomac R.
HoBoLs
Wash.
Suburban
Sanitation
District
Set-
tling
ponds
Indian Cr. of
Anacostia R.
Set- Little Paint Br.
tling of Anacostia R.
ponds
CKm Indian Cr. of
Anacostia R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
Population
Source of Supply Served
Potomac River
Anacostia River (continued) 108
National Agricultural Research
Center,
Beltsville, Md. (Prince Georges)
U. S. Horticultural Station,
Beltsville, Md. (Prince Georges)
Greenbelt, Md. (Prince Georges)
A. H. Smith Sand & Gravel Co.,
Branchvllie, Md. (Prince Georges)
Uno Excavating Co.,
Berwyn, Md. (Prince Georges)
McCeney Sand & Gravel Co.,
White Oak, Md. (Prince Georges)
Washington Suburban Sanlt.
District, D.C.
Howart Concrete Co., D.C.
Smoot Sand and Gravel Pit,
S.W., D.C.
Washington Gas and light Co., D.C.
Potomac Edison Power Co.,
Bennlng Station, D.C.
Occoquan Creek, Va. 84
Manassas, Va. (Prince William)
*Bull Run Power Co.
Manassas Park Subdivision
650
1*50
30
35
8
1,804
Northwest Br. of
Anacostia R.;
Patuxent R.
Anacostia R.
Wells
Bull Run of
Occoquan Cr.
500,000
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
15
SUPPLY
Quantity Use"
Used of Treat-
gpd(>0"3) Water merit
WASTE DISCHARGE
FKDcV
180,000
ISO
Hydro-
electric
plant
(272 HP)
QuantityPopulation Pop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waate gp<(lO"3) (Sewerage) Discharged merit Receiving Stream
650
Silt and
clay
Silt and
clay
Silt and
clay
M50
300
7,500
81,000
Inorganic
Inorganic
Gas plant
Power plant
cooling
war .-r
1,775
130 ShEg
KmCp
PtrCp
EgDfr
Be
90
ShCi
Ftr
CpEg
Bo
ShOa
CraPtr
CoDcp
BcLs
CL
Set-
tling
pond
Blue
Plains
Wash. D.
Beaverdam Cr. of
Anacostia R.
Little Paint Br.
of Anacostia R.
Beaverdam Cr.
of Anacostia R.
Indian Cr. of
Anacostia R.
Indian Cr. of
Anacostia R.
Northwest Br. of
Anacostia R.
None
CF
C.
Anacostia R.
Anacostia R.
Anacostia R.
Pri., Flat Run of
Sec., Bull Run of
E Occoquan Cr.
Pri.,
Sec.,
E
Bull Run of
Occoquan Cr.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Hanie and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Miles from Population
Mouth or
Potomac Tributary Employees
Population
Source of Supply Served
Potomac River
Occoquan Creek, Va. (continued) 8U
Quantico Marine Base,
Camp Goettge, Va. (Prince William)
Vint Hill, Va. (Fauquier)
Vienna, Va. (Fairfax)
D.C. Work House, Lorton, Va.,
(Fairfax)
Occoquan, Va. (Prince William)
Chopavamslc Creek 79
Well
1,900
2,029
213
Wells
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPPUf
ftuaniiiy UiS
Used of
Dd(3X>-3) Wafr
WASTE DISCHABCE
Type
Waate
Quantity PopulationPop.
Discharged Served BOD
gpd(lO~3) (Sewerage) Discharged
Treat-
ment Receiving Stream
190
203
750
600
1,300
2,000
1,200
Pri.,
Sec.,
E
Prl.,
Sec.,E
Prl.,
Sec.,E
Prl.,
Sec.,E
Prl.,
Sec.,E
None Occoquan Cr.
Trlb. of Bull Run
of Occoquan Cr.
South Run of
Occoquan Cr.
South Run of
Occoquan Cr.
Difficult Run of
Occoquan Cr.
Occoquan Cr.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Potomac River
Paw Paw, W. Va. (Morgan)
Hancock, Md. (Washington)
Wllliameport, Md. (Washington)
Potomac Edison Co.
Meere Sand and Gravel Co.,
Shepherd stown, Md. (Washington)
Potomac Light and Power Co.,
Hedgesville, W. Va. (Berkeley)
Potomac Edison Co.,
Falling Waters, W. Va. (Berkeley)
Tjupont, Falling Waters, W. Va.,
(Berkeley)
Shepherdstown, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Potomac Edison Co.
*Potomac Light and Power Co.
Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (Jefferson)
Potomac Edison Co.
Harpers Ferry Electric Light and
Power Co.
Miles from Population
Mouth or
of Potomac Employees
277 820
239 963
211 1,890
210
183 1,173
171 822
Source of Supply
Drilled well
Potomac R. and
Little Tonoloway Cr.
Hagerstoun, Md.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Spring and
surface
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Population
Served
83!*
1,000
2,000
2,000
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
17
SUPPLY
WASTE DISCHARGE
city Use
Used of Treat-
md(lO-3) Water meat
QuantityPopulationPop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waste gpd(lO"3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment
Receiving Stream
too
130
XSFpD
FrKDc
DcNKV
172,800 Fewer None
plant
cooling
water
(8U,000 KW)
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1,120 HP)
Hydro- None
electric
plant
(1,120 KW)
500 Cooling, CaSDc
explo- FT
elves
nanuf.
90
CSDK
None
76
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1,000 KW)
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1,000 HP)
Hydro- None
electric
plant
(QkO KM)
Hydro-
electric
plant
(1,022 HP)
800
780
*30
*5
*65
Fly ash, slag,
cinders In
vash water
Silt
288
Cooling water,
residual chemi-
cals
500
90
2,000
250
ShCl
EcgBo
None
200 ShCl
1*00 Cs
81*5 ShCi
Lp
11
Potomac River
Potomac River
Conococheague Cr.
Conococheague Cr.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Unnamed Trib. of
Qpequon Cr. and
Potomac R.
None Potomac R.
None Potomac R. and
Shenandoah R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality of Potomac Bqtloyees
Potomac River
Brunswick, Md. (Frederick) 166 3,752
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Rockville, Md. (Montgomery)
McCeney Sand and Gravel Co.,
White Oak, Md. (Montgomery)
Naval Model Testing Station,
Carderock, Md. (Montgomery)
Herndon, Va. (Fairfax) 1,1*61
Hollln Hall Village, Va. (Fairfax)
Great Falls Park, Va. (Fairfax) 127
Madeira School, Va. (Fairfax)
U.S. Bureau of Public Roads,
Langley, Va. (Fairfax)
Fairfax Sanitary District No. 1,
Va. (Fairfax)
Chesterfield Subdivision, Va. (Fairfax)
Pimmit Hills, Va. (Fairfax)
Churchill Subdivision, Va. (Fairfax)
Washington, D.C. 115 802,178
Corson and Gruman
Moloney Concrete Co.
Snoot Sand and Gravel Pit, N.W.
Smoot Sand and Gravel Fit, S.E.
Super Concrete Co.
Population
Source of Supply Served
Springs >*,500
Wells and D.C. SSC 20,000
1,200
Wells
Well UOO
Potomac R. 1,035,000
25
1*0
11
7
1*0
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
18
, T S°Pf^
Quantity QSe^
U«ed of Treat-
4(10 J) Water ment
500 D
2,000 DC &
FKDcV
C
1U6
20
FDK
Type
Waste
Locomotive
and parts
wash water
Silt and
clay
Nonmetalllc
minerals
Nonmetalllc
minerals
Nonmetalllc
minerals
Nonmetalllc
minerals
Nonmetalllc
minerals
WASTE DISCHARGE
Quantity Population Pop. Equlv.
Discharged Served BOD Treat -
gpd(10~3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment
500 3,600 SCi
<1 GO
20,000 Prl.,
Sec.,E
800 Lp
1,200 800 ClEgc
Bo
1,100 Pri.,
Sec.,E
»»00 Pri.,
Sec.,E
3,000 None
200 Prl.,
Sec.,E
700 Pri.,
Sec.
80,000 Pri.,
Sec.,E
800 Pri.,
Sec.,E
800 Pri.,
Sec.,E
600 Pri.,
Sec.,E
900,783 GmOa
CmDc
resZiVv
None
None
None
None
None
Receiving Stream
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Paint Br. of
Potomac R.
Sugarland R. of
Potomac R.
Little Hunting
Cr. of Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Trib. of
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Pimmit Run of
Potomac R.
Pimmit Run of
Potomac R.
Pimmit Run of
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Name and Location of Industry or
Municipality
Miles from
Mouth
of Potomac
Population
or
Employees
Source of Supply
Population
Served
Potomac River
Washington, D.C. (continued)
Potomac Electric Power Co.,
Buzzard Point
Arlington County, Va. (Arlington)
Arlington Asphalt Co.,
Rosslyn, Va. (Arlington)
Worthington Oil Refinery,
Rosslyn, Va. (Arlington)
Pentagon Building, Arlington, Va.,
(Arlington)
Alexandria, Va. (Arlington)
Virginia Public Service Co.
Braddock Light and Power Co.
Buffalo Sand and Gravel Co.,
Silver Rill, Md. (Prince Georges)
Washington Sand and Gravel Co.,
Marlboro Pike, Md. (Prince Georges)
Smoot Sand and Gravel Co.,
Potomac River, Md. (Prince Georges)
Parr Warehouse, Franconla, Va.,
(Fairfax)
Virginia Electric and Power Co.,
Possum Point, Va. (Fairfax)
Mt. Vernon Estates, Va. (Fairfax)
Fort Belvolr. U.S. Army,
Va. (Fairfax)
115
Potomac R.
108
197,236
Washington, D.C.
105
33,523
Occoquan Cr.
and wells
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
125,000
Accotlnk Cr.
17,000
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
SUPPLY
'ftuantity
Used of Treat-
a>d(lO-3) Water mat
WASTE DISCHARGE
QuantityPopulationPop. Equlv.
Type Discharged Served BOD Treat-
Waate gpd(10"3) (Sewerage) Discharged ment
Receiving Stream
450,000 Power
(Summer) plant
cooling
380,000 water
(Winter)
197,236
13,000
7,500 Power
plant
cooling
water
193,000 Power
plant
cooling
water
P-TcDc
CalHhSv
FrsDdCs
KjpVBTd
FD
30,000
150,000
Silt and
clay
Silt and
clay
Silt and
clay
800
700
1,000
PC
530
1*00
17,000
Prl.
None
None
Four Mile Run
of Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Prl., Potomac R.
Sec.,E
Prl., Hunting Cr. of
Sec.,E Potomac R.
Lp tfenson's Br. of
Potomac R.
Lp Oxon Run of
Potomac R.
None, Potomac R.
or
barged
to approved
area
Prl., Trlb. of
Sec.,E Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Prl., Potomac R.
Sec.,E
Pri.,E Potomac R.
Prl.,
Sec.
Prl.
-------
POTOMAC RIVER BASIN STUDIES
WATER
Miles from Population
Name and Location of Industry or Mouth or
Municipality of Potomac Employees
Potomac River
Yacht Haven Estates, Va. (Fairfax)
Fairfax, Va. (Fairfax) 1,9^6
Glymont, Md. (Charles) 89 150
Indian Head Power Plant, Md. (Charles)
Brown Field, Camp Goettge, Va.,
(Prince William)
Ilnton Hall, Va. (Prince William)
Occoquan-Woodbridge Sanitary District,
Murumsco Sewage Treatment Plant, Va. ,
(Prince William)
Gar-field Estates, Va. (Prince William)
Dahlgreen Elementary School, Va. ,
(Prince William)
Dumfries School, Va. (Prince William)
Melrose Gardens, Va. (Prince William)
Quantlco Marine Base, Midway Island, 79
Va. (Prince William)
Camp Upshar, Va. (Prince William)
Camp Barrett, Va. (Prince William)
Triangle Sanitary District, Va.
(Prince William)
Lynwood Subdivision, Va. (Prince William)
"Colonial Beach, Va. (Westmoreland) 37-5 1»105
Population
Source of Supply Served
Wells
Potomac R.
Wells 1,1*80
Potomac R.; veils
-------
POTOMAC FIVER BASIN STUDIES
20
SUPPLY WASTE DISCHARGE
^ Use
Used of Treat-
gpd(lQ-3) water ment
195
12,960 Power D
plant
cooling
water
12
3,500 FC;C
Quantity Population Pop. Equiv.
Type Discharged Served BOD
Waste gpd(lO~3) (Sewerage) Discharged
150
5,000
1,800
1,500
750
300
3,000
600
Uoo
700
2,500
20,000
1,100
2,000
2,000
1,000
1*00
(Under
Treat-
ment
Pri.,E
Pri.,
Sec.,E
ShCra
Ego
DfrBo
Pri.
Pri.,
Sec.E
Pri.,E
Pri.,
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.
Pri.,
Sec.
Pri.,
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.
Pri.,
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.,E
Pri. ,
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.,E
Pri.,
Sec.
GCDRE
constr.
Receiving Stream
Dogue Cr. of
Potomac R.
Ac cot ink Cr. of
Potomac R.'
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Trib. of Bull Run
Broad Run of
Potomac R.
Murumsco Cr. of
Potomac R.
Neabsco Cr. of
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Trib. of
Quantico Cr. of
Potomac R.
Quantico Cr. of
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
Chopawamsic Cr.
Trib. of
Trib. of
Potomac R.
Trib. of
Potomac R.
Murumsco Cr. of
Potomac R.
Potomac R.
------- |