REGULATIONS AND RESOURCE



|     FILE OF CONTINUOUS



g     MONITORING INFORMATION



      &EPA
             Office of Air, Noise and Radiation

           Division of Stationary Source Enforcement

                 Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                                            EPA-340/1-81-008
                  REGULATIONS AND RESOURCE FILE
              OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING  INFORMATION
                          October  1981
                (Current Through October  1, 1981)
                         Interim Report
                          Prepared for:

              U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                      Office of Enforcement
                  Office of General Enforcement
                     Washington, D. C. 20460
                               by
                     William J. Pate, P. E.
             Kilkelly Environmental Associates, Inc.
                      Post Office Box 31265
                  Raleigh, North Carolina  27622
     Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. Contract No. 68-01-6317
Kilkelly Environmental Associates,  Inc.  Subcontract No.  1-81-6317
                           Task No. 5

           EPA Project Officer:  Eouis R. Paley, P- E.
                                 National Monitoring Coordinator

-------
                                    DISCLAIMER





This document was  prepared  by Kilkelly  Environmental  Associates, Inc. under



Contract No. 68-01-6317, Task No. 5,  and  therefore  was  wholly or partly funded



by the I). S. Environmental  Protection Agency.   This document has not been sub-



jected to the Agency's required peer  and  policy review.   Therefore this docu-



ment does not necessarily reflect the views  of  the  Agency and official  endor-



sement should not  be inferred.

-------
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                        Page
      Introduction 	     iv

  I.  EPA Continuous Monitoring Contacts 	    I~l

 II.  Monitoring Regulations 	   II-1

      A.  NSPS Continuous Emission Monitoring Requirements -
          Promulgated  . . . .  '	•  •   II-2
          Subpart A - General Provisions 	   II-3
          Subpart D - Fossil-Fuel Fired Steam Generators .......   II-7
          Subpart Da - Electric Utility Steam Generators 	   11-10
          Subpart G - Nitric Acid Plants	11-17
          Subpart H - Sulfuric Acid Plants	11-18
          Subpart J - Petroleum Refineries 	   11-19
          Subpart P - Primary Copper Smelters  	   11-21
          Subpart Q - Primary Zinc Smelters	11-23
          Subpart R - Primary Lead Smelters	11-24
          Subpart Z - Ferroalloy Production Facilities 	   11-25
          Subpart AA - Steel Plants:  Electric Arc Plants  	   11-27
          Subpart BB - Kraft Pulp Mills	11-28
          Subpart HH - Lime Manufacturing Plants	11-31
          Appendix A - Reference Methods 1 - 4, 6-9,  19, 20	11-32
          Appendix B - Performance Specifications 1,  2,  and 3  ....   11-77

      B.  NSPS Operational Monitoring Requirements -  Promulgated .  .  .   11-89
          Subpart N - Iron and Steel Plant (BOPF)	11-90
          Subpart T - Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid Plants 	   11-91
          Subpart U - Superphosphoric Acid Plants  	   11-92
          Subpart V - Diammonium Phosphate Plants  	   11-93
          Subpart W - Triple Superphosphate Plants 	   11-94
          Subpart X - Granular Triple Superphosphate  Storage
                      Facilities	11-95
          Subpart Y - Coal Preparation Plants	11-96
          Subpart GG - Stationary Gas Turbines	11-97

      C.  NSPS Regulations - Proposed	11-100
          October 10, 1979 Proposed Revisions to Performance
             Specifications 1, 2, and 3	11-101
          January 26, 1981 Proposed Methods 6A and 6B and Reproposed
             Revisions to Performance Specifications  2 and 3 	   11-136

      D.  SIP Monitoring Requirements - Promulgated (October 6, 1975).   11-149

      E.  Summary Tables of Monitoring and Emission Regulations
             (NSPS and SIPS) (See List of Tables on page iii)  ....   11-160

III.  Vendors of Continuous Monitoring Equipment 	  III-l

 IV.  Bibliography of CEM Related Articles 	   IV-1
      Availability of EPA Publications 	   IV-6

                                      ii

-------
                           LIST OF SUMMARY TABLES
                          OF MONITORING INFORMATION

Table No.                          Subject                             Page

   1          NSPS Source Categories Required to Monitor              11-161
                 Continuously .. 	

   2          Operational Monitoring Requirements (NSPS)  	 11-165

   3          Emission Limitations (NSPS) 	 11-167
                              *
   4          Proposal and Promulgation Dates of Emission Limitations
                 for NSPS Source Categories 	 11-174

   5          NSPS Continuous Monitoring Requirements 	 11-175

   6          Quarterly Reporting Requirements (NSPS) 	 11-176

   7          Definitions of Excess Emissions (NSPS)  	 11-177

   8          Spanning and Zeroing (NSPS) 	 .... 11-179

   9          Span Specifications (NSPS)  	 11-180

  10          Notifications Requirements (NSPS) 	 .  	 11-182

  11          Subpart Da Emission Limitations (NSPS)  	 11-183

  12          Performance Specifications (NSPS) 	 11-185

  13          When To Run Monitor Performance Test (NSPS)	11-186

  14          Requirements for SIP Revisions  	 11-187

  15          Existing Sources Required to Continuously
                 Monitor Emissions (SIP)  	 11-188
                                     iii

-------
                                INTRODUCTION






    On October 6, 1975 the Environmental Protection Agency  promulgated  con-




tinuous emission monitoring  requirements for  selected NSPS  (40  CFR  60)  source




categories.  Also on October 6, 1975 EPA promulgated a  revision to  40 CFR




Part 51 which required states  to  revise their State Implementation  Plans  (SIP)




to include continuous monitori-ng  requirements for  a minimum number  of spe-




cified existing  source categories.  EPA included in this  rulemaking package




performance and  test requirements which prescribe  minimum design and perfor-




mance crtieria specifications  for continuous  emission monitors.   Since




October 6, 1975, EPA has expanded requirements  for continuous monitoring  to




additional source categories and  has revised  the performance specifications.




On June 11, 1979 EPA promulgated  major revisions to the Subpart Da  NSPS for




new utility steam generating units, including requirements  for  the  use  of con-




tinuous emission monitoring  systems (GEMS)  to demonstrate source compliance




with S02 and NOX emission limitations and  the S02  percent reduction standard.




In addition, EPA proposed extensive revisions to the monitor performance  spe-




cifications on October 10, 1979 and on January  26, 1981.









    This report  is  a compilation  of continuous  monitoring information.




Section I identifies some of the  EPA personnel  responsible  for  continuous




monitoring implementation.   Section II contains updated monitoring  regula-




tions excerpted  from the Federal  Register,  along with presently proposed  regu-




lations and summary tables of  regulatory information.   Section  III  contains  a




listing of CEM vendors.  Section  IV presents  a  bi-bliography of  applicable




literature.
                                      iv

-------
    The EPA, Division of Stationary  Source  Enforcement  first issued this




report in November 1978.  It was  revised  and  reissued in October 1979.   This




edition has been changed by revising the  introduction,  the personnel and phone




numbers of the CEM contact lists, Subpart D,  and  the  Summary Tables.  The EPA




organization function statements  and the  excerpts  of  the preambles which were




in the last report have been deleted.  The  revised report contains the pro-




posed October 10, 1979 Performance Specifications,  the  reproposed




January 26, 1981 Performance Specfications, and the proposed Methods 6A and




6B.  This report also contains an updated list of  CEM vendors and a revised




and updated CEM bibliography.

-------
             SECTION I




EPA CONTINUOUS MONITORING CONTACTS
                1-1

-------
                 EPA REGIONAL CONTINUOUS MONITORING CONTACTS
Person

REGION I:
    Frank Li Hey

REGION II:
    Marcus Kantz
    Ann Cownir
    Dennis Santella

REGION III:
    Gary Gross
    Andrew Kolarski

REGION IV:
    Brian Seals
    Keith Colamarino
    Jim Littell
    Joe Riley
    Bill Voshell

REGION V:
    Larry Kertcher
    Pat McCoy
    Ed Zylstra

REGION VI:
    Phil Schwindt
    Stanley Spruiell

REGION VII:
    John Giar
    JoAnn Heiman
    Mike Sanderson
    Tony Wayne

REGION VIII:
    Keith Tipton
    Roxann Varzeas
    Steven Frey
REGION IX:
    Alvin
    Steve
    Chuck
    Helen
    Paula
Chun
Cimperman
Seeley
Okamoto
Bission
REGION X:
    Paul Boys
    Wayne Grother
                     Division
             New England Regional  Laboratory
             Environmental  Services Division
             Environmental  Services Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air 8 Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air Management Division
             Air Management Division
             Environmental Services Division
             Environmental Services Division
             Air & Waste Materials Division
             Environmental Services Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Environmental Services Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
             Air & Waste Management Division
Air Management Division
Air Management Division
Air Management Division
Air Management Division
Air Management Division
             Environmental Services Division
             Air Management Division
                                   Phone  Number
                                    (FTS/Comm)

                                     617-861-6700
                                 FTS-340-6690/201-321-6690
                                 FTS-340-6690/201-321-6690
                                 FTS-264-9628/212-264-9628
                                 FTS-597-8907/304-597-8907
                                 FTS-923-1050/304-233-1271
                                 FTS-257-4552/404-881-4552
                                 FTS-257-4298/404-881-4298
                                 FTS-257-4552/404-881-4552
                                 FTS-257-4552/404-881-4552
                                 FTS-257-4862/404-881-4901
                                 FTS-353-2086/312-353-2086
                                 FTS-353-2086/312-353-2086
                                 FTS-353-9771/312-353-9771
                                 FTS-729-2724/214-767-2724
                                 FTS-729-2755/214-767-2755
                                 FTS-758-4461/816-374-4461
                                 FTS-758-7131/816-374-7131
                                 FTS-758-5082/816-374-5082
                                 FTS-758-7130/816-374-7130
                                 FTS-327-4561/303-837-4261
                                 FTS-327-6046/303-837-6046
                                 FTS-327-6047/303-837-6047
FTS-454-8230/415-556-8230
FTS-454-8230/415-556-8230
FTS-454-8038/415-556-8038
FTS-454-8038/415-556-8038
FTS-454-8038/415-556-8038
                                 FTS-399-1106/206-442-1106
                                 FTS-399-1387/206-442-1387
                                     1-2

-------
                     EPA CONTINUOUS MONITORING CONTACTS
Subject

Regulations Development




CEM Enforcement
Quality Assurance
Methods Development
 and Evaluation
Emissions Measurements
Gas Monitor Research
Opacity Research
 Person-Divison

 Larry Jones - ESED

 Gene Smith - ESED


* Louis Paley - DSSE

 Kirk Foster - DSSE


 Tom Logan - QAD

 Darryl Von Lehmden - QAD


 Roger Shigehara - ESED

 Peter Westlin - ESED


 George Walsh - ESED


 Jim Cheney - ESRL


 Bill Conner- ESRL

 Ken Knapp - ESRL
State Implementation Plans     Joseph Sableski - CPDD

                               John Silvasi - CPDD
Continuous Monitor
 Demonstration
 D.  Bruce Harris -  IERL
 Phone Number
Commercial/FTS

919-541-5421
    629-5421
919-541-5421
    629-5421

202-382-2884
    382-2884
919-541-4571
    629-4571

919-541-2580
    629-2580
919-541-2415
    629-2415

919-541-2237
    629-2237
919-541-2237
    629-2237

919-541-5243
    629-5243

919-541-3085
    629-3085

919-541-3085
    629-3085
919-541-3085
    629-3085

919-541-5437
    629-5437
919-541-5437
    629-5437

919-541-7807
    629-7807
                                     1-3

-------
                EPA REGIONAL COAL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS CONTACTS
NAME
Region I:
John Carlson

Region II:
Dennis Santella

Region III;
Peter Schaul

Region IV:
Jim Manning
Region V:
David Schultz

Region VI:
Phil Schwindt

Region VII:
Tony Wayne

Region VIII:
Steven Frey

Region IX:
        DIVISION
PHONE NUMBER
New England Regional  Laboratory  617-861-6700
Air & Waste Management Division  FTS-264-9628/212-264-9628
Air & Waste Management Division  FTS-597-3437/304-597-3437
Air & Waste Management Division  FTS-881-3286/404-881-3286
Air Management Division          FTS-353-2088/312-353-2088
Environmental  Services Division  FTS-729-2724/214-767-2724
Air & Waste Management Division  FTS-758-7130/816-374-7130
Air & Waste Management Division  FTS-327-6047/303-837-6047
Region X:
Paul Boys
Environmental  Services Division  FTS-399-1106/206-442-1106
                                      1-4

-------
      SECTION II




MONITORING REGULATIONS
         II-1

-------
NSPS CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - PROMULGATED
                              II-2

-------
   Swbpart  A   C«iwol Previsions
160.1   Applicability.
  Except AS provided In Subparts B and
C, tee provisions of this part apply to
the owner or operator of any stationary
source which contains an affected facil-
ity, the construction or modification of
which  is commenced  after the date of
publication in tills part  of any standard
(or, if earlier, the date of publication of
any  proposed standard)  applicable to
that facility.


160.2   Definition*.
  As used  in this  part, all  terms not
denned herein shall have the meaning
given them in the  Act:
  (a) "Act" means the Clean Air Act
(42 UJB.C.  1857  et  seq., as amended by
Public Law  91-604, 84 Stat. 1876).
  (b) "Administrator"  means the Ad-
ministrator of the  Environmental Pro-
tection Agency or his authorized repre-
sentative.
  (c) "Standard" means a standard of
performance  proposed  or  promulgated
under this part.
  (d)  "Stationary  source"  means any
building, structure, facility, or installa-
tion which  emits or may emit any air
pollutant and which contains any one or
combination of the following:
  (1) Affected facilities.
  (2) Existing facilities.
  (3) Facilities of the type for which no
standards have been promulgated in this
part.
   (e)  "Affected facility"  means, with
reference to a stationary source, any ap-
paratus to which a standard is applicable.
   (f)  "Owner or operator"  means any
person who owns,  leases, operates, con-
trols, or supervises an affected  facility
or a stationary source  of which an af-
fected facility is a part.
   (g) "Construction" means  fabrication,
erection, or fn»taii«.Hnn of  an  affected
facility.
   (h)  "Modification" means any physi-
cal change in, or change in the method
of operation of, an existing facility which
increases the amount of any air pollutant
(to which a  standard  applies)  emitted
into the atmosphere by that facility or
which results in the emission of any air
pollutant (to which a standard- applies)
into  the  atmosphere  not   previously
emitted.
  (1) "Commenced" means, with  respect
to the definition of "new source" In sec-
tion 111 (a) (2) of the Act, that an owner
or operator has undertaken a continuous
program of construction or modification
or that an owner or operator has entered
into a contractual  obligation to  under-
take and complete, within a reasonable
time, a continuous program of construc-
tion or modification.
  (j) "Opacity" means the degree to
which emissions reduce the transmission
of light and obscure the view of an object
m the background.
  (k) "Nitrogen oxides" means all oz-
    i of nitrogen except nitrous oxide, as
measured by test methods set  forth in
this part.
  (1)  "Standard  conditions"  means  a
temperature of 20*C (68°P) and a pres-
sure of 760 mm of Hg (29.92 In. of Hg).
  (m)  "Proportional  sampling" means
sampling at a rate that produces a con-
stant ratio of sampling rate to stack i**
flow rate.
  (n) "Isoldnetic   sampling"   means
sampling in which the linear velocity of
the gas entering the sampling nozzle is
equal to that of  the undisturbed gaa
stream at the sample point.
  (o) "Startup" means  the  setting in
operation 6f an affected facility for any
purpose.
  
-------
nature of the intern repair* or adjust-
ments.
  (4) When  no excess emissions  nave
occurred or the continuous monitoring
system u; iivs net, been inoperative, re-
paired,  or adjusted, such information
•hall be stated in the report.
  (d) Any owner or operator subject to
the provisions ol this part shall maintain
a file of all measurements, including con-
tinuous monitoring system, monitoring
device,  and  performance  testing meas-
urements; all continuous monitoring sys-
tem performance evaluations; all  con-
tinuous monitoring system or monitoring
device calibration checks; adjustments
and maintenance performed  on  these
systems or devices; and all other infor-
mation required by this part recorded in
 a permanent form suitable for inspec-
 tion. The file shall be retained for at least
 two years following  the date of such
measurement, ^^^^Tift"^, rcporto, and
records.
 | 60.8  Performance le*tt.
   (a) Within 60 days after achieving the
 maximum production rate at which the
 affected facility will be operated, but not
 later than  180 days after initial startup
 of such facility and at such other times
 as may be required by the Administrator
 under section 114 of the Act, the owner
 or operator of such facility shall conduct
 performance test(s) and furnish the Ad-
 ministrator a written report of the results
 of such performance test(s).
  § 60.11  Compliance with ttandarcU ami
      Buintenance requirement*.

   (a) Compliance with standards In this
  part, other than opacity standards, shall
  be determined only by performance testa
  established by ! 60.8.
   (b) Compliance with  opacity  stand-
  ards in this part shall be determined by
  conducting  observations ID accordance
  with Reference Method t la Appendix A
  of this  part or any alternative method
  that is approved by  the  Administrator.
  Opacity readings of portions of plume*
  which  contain condensed,  uncomblned
  water vapor shall not be used for pur-
  poses of determining compliance with
  opacity standards. The  results of con-
  tinuous monitoring by  transmlssometer
  which  indicate that the  opacity at  the
  time visual observations were made was
  not In excess of the standard are proba-
  tive  but not conclusive evidence of  the
  actual  opacity of an emission,  provided
  that the source shall meet the burden of
  proving that the Instrument used  meets
  (at  the time of the alleged violation)
  Performance Specification 1 In Appendix
  B of this part, has been properly main-
  tained  and  (at the time  of the alleged
  violation)   calibrated,  and that  the
  resulting data have not been tampered
  with In any way.
   (c) The opacity standards set forth In
 this  part shall apply  at all  times  except
during periods of startup, shutdown, mal-
function,  and as otherwise provided in
the applicable standard.
  (d)  At  all times, including periods of
startup,   shutdown,  and  malfunction,
owners and operators shall, to the extent
practicable, maintain and operate any
affected facility including associated air
pollution  control equipment in a manner
consistent with good air pollution control
practice  for minimizing emissions. De-
termination of whether acceptable oper-
ating  and maintenance  procedures  are
being  used will be based on Information
available to the Administrator which may
include, but is not limited to, monitoring
results, opacity observations,  review of
operating and maintenance procedures,
and Inspection of the source.
   (e) (1)  An owner or operator of an af-
fected facility may request the Admin-
istrator  to  determine opacity  of  emis-
sions  from the affected facility during
the initial performance tests required by
 f 60.8.
   (2)  Upon receipt from  such  owner or
operator  of the written report of the re-
lults of  the performance tests required
by f 60.8, the  Administrator will make
 a finding concerning compliance  with
opacity and other applicable standards.
If  the Administrator finds that an af-
fected facility is in compliance with all
 applicable standards for which perform-
 ance tests are conducted In accordance
with I 60.8 of this part  but during the
time such performance  tests are being
conducted falls to meet any  applicable
 opacity  standard, he shall notify  the
 owner or operator and advise him that he
 may petition the Administrator within
 10 days of receipt of notification to make
 appropriate adjustment to the opacity
 standard for the affected facility.
   (3)  The Administrator will grant such
 a petition upon a demonstration by the
 owner or operator that the affected fa-
cility  and associated air pollution con-
 trol equipment was operated and main-
 tained in a  manner to minimize  the
 opacity of emissions during the perform-
 ance tests; that  the performance tests
 were performed under the conditions es-
 tablished by the Administrator; and that
 the affected facility and associated  air
 pollution control  equipment  were  in-
 capable of being adjusted or operated to
 meet the applicable opacity standard.
   (4)  The  Administrator  will establish
an  opacity  standard for  the  affected
facility meeting the  above requirements
at a level  at  which the  source will be
 able,  as  Indicated by the  performance
and opacity tests, to meet the opacity
standard at all times during which the
 source is  meeting the mass or concentra-
 tion  emission standard.  The  Adminis-
trator will  promulgate the new opacity
standard in the  FIDUUL  Rzomxi.
9 60.13  Monitoring requirements.
  (a) For the  purposes of this section,
all continuous monitoring systems re-
quired under applicable subparts shall
be subject to the provisions of this sec-
tion  upon  promulgation  of perform-
ance  specifications  for  continuous
monitoring system under Appendix B
to this part, unless:
  (1)  The  continnods   monitoring
system is subject to the  provisions  ol
paragraphs  (c)(2) and (c)(3) of  this
section, or
  (2) otherwise specified in an applica-
ble subpart or by the Administrator.
  (b) All continuous monitoring systems
and monitoring devices shall be installed
and operational prior to conducting per-
formance tests under ( 60.8. Verification
of operational status shall, as a mini-
mum, consist of the following:
  (1) For  continuous -monitoring sys-
tems referenced in paragraph (c) (1) of
this section, completion of  the  condi-
tioning period  specified  by applicable
requirements In Appendix B.
  (2) For  continuous monitoring sys-
tems referenced in paragraph (c) (2) of
this section, completion of seven days of
operation.
  (3) For monitoring devices referenced
in applicable subparts, completion of  the
manufacturer's written  requirements or
recommendations for checking the op-
eration or calibration of the device.
  (c) During  any  performance  tests
required under {60.8 or within 30 days
thereafter and at such other times at
may be required by the Administrator
under section 114 of the Act the owner
or operator of any affected facility shall
conduct continuous  monitoring system
performance evaluations and furnish  the
Administrator within 60 days thereof two
or, upon request, more copies of a written
report of the results of such tests. These
continuous monitoring system perform-
ance evaluations shall be conducted In
accordance with the following specifica-
tions and procedures:
  (1)  Continuous monitoring systems
listed within this paragraph except as
provided in paragraph (c) (2) of this sec-
tion shall  be evaluated in accordance
with the  requirements  and  procedures
contained  in the applicable perform-
ance  specification  of Appendix  B  as
follows:
  (1) Continuous monitoring systems  for
measuring opacity of  emissions  shall
comply with Performance Specification 1.
  (11) Continuous monitoring systems for
measuring  nitrogen  oxides  emissions
shall comply with Performance Specifi-
cation 2.
  (ill) Continuous monitoring systems for
measuring sulfur dioxide emissions shall
comply with Performance Specification 2.
  (iv) Continuous monitoring systems for
measuring the oxygen content or carbon
dioxide content of effluent gases shall
comply with Performance Specification
I.
  (2) An owner or operator who, prior
to  September  11, 1974, entered  into a
binding contractual obligation to pur-
chase   specific  continuous  monitoring
system components except as referenced
by  paragraph (c) (2) (ill) of this section
shall comply with the following require-
ments:
  (i) Continuous monitoring systems for
measuring opacity of emissions shall be
capable  of -measuring  emission levels
within  ±20  percent with  a confidence
level of 95 percent. The Calibration Error
Test and associated  calculation  proce-
dures set forth In Performance Specifl-
                                                            II-4

-------
 cation 1 of Appendix B ihall be UMd for
 demonstrating  compliance  with  this
 •peclflcatlon.
   (11) Continuous monitoring systems
 for measurement of nitrogen oxides or
 sulfur dioxide shall be capable of meas-
 uring emission levels within ±20 percent
 with a confidence level of 95 percent The
 Calibration Error Test,  the  Field Test
 for Accuracy (Relative), and associated
 operating and calculation procedures set
 forth in Performance Specification 2 of
 Appendix B shall be used for demon-
 strating compliance with this specifica-
 tion.
    (Ill) Owners or operators  of all con-
 tinuous monitoring systems Installed on
 an affected facility prior to October 6,
 1975  are  not   required  to  conduct
 tests under paragraphs (c) (2) (1)  and/or
 (11)  of this section unless requested by
 the Administrator.
    (3) All continuous monitoring systems
  referenced by paragraph (c) (2) of this
  section shall be upgraded or replaced (if
  necessary)  with  new continuous moni-
  toring systems, and the new or improved
  systems  shall be demonstrated to com-
  ply  with  applicable  performance speci-
  fications  under paragraph  (c) (1)  of this
  section on or before September 11. 1979.
    (d)  Owners or operators  of all con-
  tinuous monitoring  systems  Installed in
  accordance with the provisions  of this
  part shall check the zero and span drift
  at least  once daily in accordance with
  the method prescribed by the manufac-
  turer of such systems unless the manu-
  facturer   recommends   adjustments at
* shorter  Intervals.  In  which case such
  recommendations shall be followed. The
  sero and span shall, as a minimum, be
  adjusted whenever the 24-hour zero drift
  or 24-hour calibration drift limits of the
  applicable performance specifications in
  Appendix B are exceeded. For continuous
  monitoring systems measuring opacity of
  emissions,  the optical  surfaces exposed
  to the effluent gases shall be cleaned prior
  to performing the zero or span drift ad-
  justments except that for systems using
  automatic zero adjustments, the optical
  surfaces  shall be cleaned when the cum-
  ulative automatic zero compensation ex-
  ceeds four percent opacity. Unless other-
  wise approved by the Administrator, the
  following procedures, as applicable, shall
  be followed:
    (1) For extractive  continuous moni-
  toring systems measuring gases,  mini-
  mum procedures shall include -introduc-
  ing applicable zero and span gas mixtures
  into the measurement system as near the
  probe as is practical. Span and zero gases
  certified  by  their manufacturer to be
  traceable to National Bureau of Stand-
  ards reference gases shall be used when-
  ever these reference gases are available.
  The span and zero gas mixtures shall be
  the same composition as specified In Ap-
  pendix B of this part. Every six months
  from date of manufacture, span and zero
  gases shall be reanalyzed by conducting
  triplicate analyses with  Reference Meth-
  ods 6 for SO,,  7 for NO,, and J for O,
  and CO:  respectively. The gases may be
  analyzed at less frequent  Intervals If
longer chelf lives are guaranteed by the
manufacturer.
  (2)   For  non-extractive  continuous
monitoring  systems  measuring  gases,
minimum procedures shall Include up-
scale  check (s) using a certified calibra-
tion gas  cell or test cell which is func-
tionally equivalent to a known gas con-
centration. The zero check may  be  per-
formed by computing the zero value from
upscale measurements or by  mechani-
cally  producing a zero condition.
  (3)  For continuous monitoring systems
measuring  opacity  of emissions, mini-
mum  procedures shall include  a  method
for producing a simulated zero  opacity
condition and an upscale (span)  opacity
condition using a certified neutral den-
sity filter or other  related technique to
produce a known obscuration of the light
beam. Such  procedures shall  provide a
system check of the  analyzer internal
optical surfaces and all electronic cir-
cuitry Including the lamp and photode-
tector assembly.
    Except for system breakdowns, re-
pairs, calibration checks, and zero and
span  adjustments required under para-
graph (d) of this section, all continuous
monitoring systems shall be in  contin-
uous  operation and shall meet minimum
frequency of operation requirements as
follows:
   (1) All continuous monitoring  sys-
tems referenced  by paragraphs (c)(l)
and (c) (2)  of this section for measuring
opacity  of  emissions  shall  complete a
minimum of one cycle of sampling and
 analyzing for gy^h successive ten-second
period and one cycle of data  recording
for each successive six-minute period.
   (2) All continuous monitoring systems
 referenced  by paragraph (c)(l) of this
 section for measuring oxides of nitrogen,
 sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, or oxygen
 shall complete a minimum of one  cycle
 of operation (sampling, analyzing, and
 data recording)  for each successive 15-
 mlnute period.
   (3) All continuous monitoring systems
 referenced  by paragraph (c) (2) of this
 section,  except opacity, shall complete a
 minimum of one cycle of operation (sam-
 pling, analyzing, and data  recording)
 for each successive one-hour period.
   (f) All continuous monitoring systems
 or monitoring devices shall be  Installed
 such that representative measurements
 of emissions or process parameters from
 the affected facility are obtained. Addi-
 tional procedures for location of contin-
 uous  monitoring systems contained In
 the  applicable Performance  Specifica-
 tions of Appendix B of this part shall be
 used.
   (g) When the effluents from  a single
 affected facility or two or more affected
 facilities subject  to the same  emission
 standards are combined before being re-
 leased to the atmosphere, the owner or
 operator may  install  applicable contin-
 uous monitoring systems on each effluent
 or on the combined effluent. When the af-
 fected facilities  are not subject to the
 same emission standards, separate con-
 tinuous monitoring systems shall be in-
 stalled on each effluent. When the efflu-
 ent from one affected facility is released
                   II-5
to the atmosphere  through more than
one point,  the  owner or operator shall
Install applicable continuous monitoring
systems on each separate effluent unless
the Installation  of fewer systems is ap-
proved by the Administrator.
  (h) Owners or operators of all con-
tinuous monitoring systems for measure-
ment of opacity shall reduce all data to
six-minute  averages  and  for  systems
other than opacity to one-hour averages
for time periods under i 60.2 (x)  and (r)
respectively. Six-minute opacity averages
sha'l be ca. -Ur  ,-d from 24  or more data
points  equaJy  spaced  over each six-
minute period. For systems other than
opacity, one-hour averages shall  be com-
puted from four or  more  data points
equally  spaced over  each one-hour pe-
riod. Data recorded during periods of sys-
tem  breakdowns,  repairs,  calibration
checks,  and zero and span adjustments
shall not be included in the data averages
computed  under  this  paragraph.  An
arithmetic  or integrated average of all
data may be used. The data output of all
continuous monitoring systems  may be
recorded in reduced or nonreduced form
(e.g. ppm pollutant  and percent  O* or
Ib/mllllon  Btu of pollutant). All excess
emissions  shall be converted into units
of the standard using the applicable con-
version  procedures specified in subparts.
After conversion into units of the stand-
ard, the data may be rounded to the same
number of significant  digits used in sub-
parts  to specify  the applicable standard
(e.g., rounded to the nearest one percent
opacity).
  O)  After receipt and consideration of
written application, the Administrator
may  approve alternatives to any moni-
toring procedures or requirements of this
part  including,  but not limited to the
following:
   (1)  Alternative monitoring require-
ments when installation of a continuous
monitoring system or monitoring device
specified by this part would not provide
accurate measurements due to liquid wa-
ter or other interferences caused by sub-
stances with the effluent gases.
   (2)  Alternative monitoring require-
ments when the affected facility  is infre-
quently operated.
   (3)  Alternative monitoring require-
ments to accommodate continuous moni-
toring systems  that  require  additional
measurements to correct for stack mois-
ture conditions.
   (4) Alternative locations for installing
continuous monitoring systems or moni-
toring devices when the owner or opera-
tor can demonstrate that installation at
alternate  locations will enable accurate
and representative measurements.
  (5) Alternative methods  of converting
pollutant concentration measurements to
units of the standards.
  (6)  Alternative procedures  for per-
forming daily checks of zero and span
drift that do not involve use of span gases
or test cells.
  (7) Alternatives  to the  A.S.T.M. test
methods or sampling procedures specified
by any lubpart.

-------
   (8) Alternative  continuous  monitor-
ing systems that do not meet the design
or performance requirements In Perform-
ance Specification 1, Appendix B, but
adequately demonstrate a  definite  and
consistent relationship between its meas-
urements  and the  measurements  of
opacity by a system complying with the
requirements  in Performance Specifica-
tion 1. The Administrator  may require
that such demonstration be performed
for each affected facility.
   (9) Alternative  monitoring require-
ments when  the effluent  from a single
affected facility or  the combined effluent
from two  or more  affected  facilities are
released to the atmosphere through more
than one point.

(••e. 114 at tht Ctaaa Air Aet m MM^*
(U VAC. 1M70-4).).
                                                        II-6

-------
Swbperf D—Standards of Performance
for Fo«sll-Fu«l Firvd Stoem Generator*
 I 60.40   Api>Iirabllilr and dmiffnallon of
     • fftvted facility.
  (•) The affected facilities to which the
 provisions of this subpart apply we:  •
  U) Each fosstl-fuel-ftred steam gen-
 erating unit of more  than 73 megawatts
 heat  input rate (250 million Btu  per
 hour).
  (2) Each fossil-fuel and wood-residue*
 fired  steam generating unit capable of
 firing fossil fuel at a heat input rate of
 more than  73 megawatt* (250 million
 Btu per hour).
  (b) Any change to an existing foutl-
 fuel-flred  steam  generating  unit  to
 accommodate the  use of  combustible
 materials,  other than fossil  fuels  ai
 denned  in this subpart. shall not bring
 that unit under the applicability of this
 cubpart.
  (c) Except as provided In paragraph
 (d) of this  section, any  facility under
 paragraph (a) of this section that com-
 menced construction or modification
 after August 17, 1971, Is  subject to the
 requirements of this subpart.
  (d)      The     requirements     of
 §S 60.44(aX4), (a)(5), (b), and (dT, and
 60.4S(fX4Xvi) are applicable to lignite-
 fired steam generating units that com-
 menced construction or modification
 after December 22,1976.
 1 60.41  Definition*.
  As used in tills subpart, all terms not
 defined herein shall have the meaning
 given them In the Act, and In subpart A
 of this part.
  (a) "Fossil fuel-fired  steam generat-
 ing unit" means a furnace or boiler used
 in the process of burning fossil fuel for
 the purpose of producing steam by heat
 transfer.
   "Coal refuse" means waste-prod-
 ucts of ooal mining, cloning, and coal
 preparation operations  (e.g. culm, gob.
 etc.)  containing  coal, matrix material.
 claj,  and other organic aad Inorganic
   (d> Toesfl fuel and wood residue-fired
 •team generating unit" means a furnace
 or boiler used in the process of burning
 fossil fuel and wood residue for the pur-
 pose of producing steam by heat transfer.
    "Wood residue" means bark, saw-
 dust. slabs,  chips, shavings,  null  trim.
 and other wood product* derived  from
 wood processing and forest management

 °?Jr S5"  means all solid fuels  clas-
sified as anthracite, bituminous, subbi-
tumtaous,  or lignite by  the American
Society for Testing Material. Designa-
tion D 388-66.
 | 60.42  Statwlartf for

   (a) On and after the date on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted by | 60.8 Is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this lubpart shall cause to be discharged
 kUo the atmosphere from aoy affected
 facility any gam which:
  (2)  Exhibit greater than 20  percent
opacity  except  for  one  six-minute
period per hour  of  not more than 27
percent Opacity.

 | 60.44   Standard for mttmr d*KhU.
   (a) On and after the date on which
 the performance test required to  be con-
 ducted by | M.t U completed, ao owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cawe  to be discharged
 mto the  atmosphere from any affected
 facility any gases which contain sulfur
 •oxide m excess of:
   (1) 340 nanoerams per joule beat in-
 put  (0.80 Ib per million Btu)  derived
 from liquid fossil fuel or liquid fossil fuel
 and wood residue.
,   (2) 520 nanograms per joule heat in-
i put (1.2 lb per million Btu) derived from
 •olid fossil fuel or solid fossil fuel and
: wood residue.
   (b) When different  fossil fuels are
', burned simultaneously in any combina-
 tion, the applicable standard (in og/J)
 •hall be determined  by proration using
 the following formula:
                y(340)+»(520)
         PS.
 where:
   PS»oj >' thf prorated standard for sulfur
     dioxide when burning  different fuels
     simultaneously,  ia  ninograms  per
     joule  beat  input  derived  from  all
     fossil  fuels fired or  from all fotsil fueli
     and wood residue 5red,
   IT is the percentage of  total beat input
     derived from  liquid  fossil  fuel,  and
   t is the percentage of  total heat input
     derived from wlid fooil fuel.

   (c) Compliance ah»T] be tinned on the
 total heat  Input from  aH fossfl fuel*
 buroed. including gaseous fuel*.
 14*44  9uW«r4 f«r
   (a) On and after the date on which
 9te performance test required to be con-
 ducted by | 60.8 is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 fhk subpart shall cause to be discharged
 into the atmosphere from any affected
 facility  any gases which contain nitro-
 gen oxttes, expressed at NO, In exce« of:
    (1) 86 nanograms per joule heat input
  (0.20 lb per million Btu) derived from
  gaseous fossil fuel or gaseous  fossil fuel
  and wood residue.
                                                        II-7
  (2) 130 nanograms per joule heat in-
put  (0.30 lb per million Btu)  derived
from liquid fossil fuel or liquid fossil fuel
and  wood residue.
  (3) 300 nanograms per joule heat In-
put  (0.70 lb per million Btu)  derived
from solid fossil fuel or solid fossil fuel
and  wood residue (except lignite or a
•olid fossil fuel containing  25 percent.
by weight, or more of coal refuse).
  (4) 280 nanograms  per  joule heat
input (0.60 lb per million Btu). derived
frora^Mgnite or ligHtee and wood resi-
due  (except as provided under para-
graph (aXS) of this  section).
  (5) 340 nanograms  per  joule heat
input (0.80 lb per million Btu) derived
from lignite which  is mined In North
Dakota, South Dakota,- or Montana
and which is burned In a cyclone-fired
  (b) Except as provided under para-
graphs   (c)  and (d)  of this section,
when different fossil fuels are burned
simultaneously in  any combination,
the applicable standard (in ng/J) is de-
termined by proration using the  fol-
lowing formula:

  PSn.-  tfl(MO)-n
-------
  (b) Certain of the continuous moni-
toring system requirements under para-
graph (a)  of this section do not apply
to owners or operators under the follow-
ing conditions:
  (1) For a fossil fuel-fired steam gen-
erator that  bums only gaseous fossil
fuel, continuous monitoring systems for
measuring the opacity of emissions and
sulfur dioxide  emissions are  not  re-
quired.
   <8> For a fossil fuel-fired steam  gen-
erator that does not use a flue gas de-
culfurization device, a continuous moni-
toring system for measuring sulfur di-
oxide emissions  is not required If the
•owner or operator monitors sulfur di-
oxide emissions  by  fuel sampling and
analysis under  paragraph  (d)  of  this
section.
   (3) Notwithstanding | M.13(o>. In-
stallation  of a  continuous monitoring
system  for nitrogen oxides  may be de-
layed "until after the initial performance
tests under f 60.8 have been conducted.
If the owner or operator demonstrates
during the performance test that emis-
sions of nitrogen oxides are less than 70
percent of  the  applicable standards in
I 60.44, a continuous monitoring system
for measuring nitrogen oxides emissions'
Is not required. If the Initial performance
test results  show that  nitrogen oxide
emissions are greater than 70 percent of
the  applicable standard, the  owner or
operator shall install a continuous moni-
toring system for nitrogen oxides within
on* year after the date of the Initial per-
formance test* under I 60.8 and comply
with all other applicable monitoring re-
quirements under this part.
   (4) If an owner or operator does not
install any continuous monitoring sys-
tems for sulfur oxides and nitrogen ox-
Ides, as provided under paragraphs (b>
 (1)  and  (b)(3)  or paragraphs  (b) (2)
and (b)(3) of this section a continuous
monitoring system for measuring either
oxygen or carbon dioxide is not required.
   (c> For performance evaluations un-
der  I60.13(c)   and  calibration  cheers
under |60.13(d), the  following proce-
dures shall be used:
 .  (1) Reference Methods 6 or  7, as ap-
plicable, .shall  be uced for conducting
performance evaluations of sulfur diox-
ide and nitrogen oxides continuous mon-
itoring systems.
   (2) Sulfur dioxide or nitric  oxide, as
applicable, shall be used for preparing
calibration gas mixtures under Perform-
ance Specification 2 of Appendix  B to
this part.
  (3) For affected facilities burning fos-
sil fuel(s), the span value for a continu-
ous  monitoring  system  measuring  the
opacity  of emissions shall be 60, 90. or
100 percent and for a continuous moni-
toring system measuring sulfur oxides or
nitrogen  oxides the span value shall be
determined as follows:
            (In peril pv mflUoo]
  Poedl fuel    Bp*r ntoe (or    Spin ftiat lot
             •aUw 4loBd<    altncw aite
Om --------
liquid   __
               0)
Solid
LOOD
L100
         **
         BO
         HO
 i Not tppUeibk.

where:
c-tb*  fraction of total but Input derived
  from gueoui fouil fuel, and
y-tne  fraction of toUl be»t input derived
  from liquid fowll fuel, and
s-tbc  fraction of total beat input derived
  tram ioUd foidl fuel.
  (4) All span  values computed under
paragraph  -
   (vi) For lignite coal as classified ac-
 cording  to   A.S.T.M.   D   388-«.
 F= 2.659x10-' dscm/J (9900  dscf/ffifl-
 Jion Btu) and Ft=0.516xlO-' scm CCV
 J (1920 scf CO,/million Btu).
    (S> The owner or operator  may use the
 following equation to determine  an F
 factor (dscm/J or dscf/million Btu) on.
 a dry basU (If it is desired to calculate f
 on a wet basis, consult the Administra-
 tor)  or Ff factor (scm COt/J, or scf COi/
 million  Btu) on either basis In lieu of the
 F  or  Ft factors  specified in paragraph
 (f)(4) of this section:
                                                        II-8

-------
               (pet. H)+»S.5 (pet. C) -I- 35.6 (pot. 8)+8.7 (pet. N)-28.7 (pet O)l
                                         GCV                     - — - •
                                     (81 unJU)
                                  (English units)

                             m _a.OX10-« (pet. C)
                                       ocv—-'

                                    (SI units)

                                f _821X10'(%C)
                                        OCV

                                  (English units)
  (1)  H, C, 8. N, and O art content by
weight of hydrogen, carbon, sulfur, ni-
trogen,  and oxygen  (expressed as per-
cent) , respectively, at determined on the
•MM  basis M OCV by ultimate analytic
of the fuel fired. uilng A.S.T.M. method
D3 178-74 or D3176 (solid fuels) , or com-
puted from results using A.S.T.M. meth-
ods   D1137-M(70),  DlM5-«4(73).  or
01946-67(72) (gaseous fuels) as applica-

   nt)  OCV is  the cross  calorific value
(kJ/kg. Btu/lb) of  the fuel combusted.
determined by the A.S.T.M  test methods
D 2015-S6C72) for solid fuels and D 1826-
64(70) for gaseous fuels as  applicable.
   (ill) For affected  facilities  which fire
both fossil fuels and nonfossll fuels, the
F or  F, value shall be subject to the
Administrator's approval.
  (6)  For affected facilities firing com-
binations of fossil fuels or fossil fuels and
wood  residue, the F or F, factors deter-
mined by paragraphs (f ) (4) or (f) (5) at
this section shall be prorated  in accord-
ance with the applicable formula as fal-
lows:
wtten:
ft or (
           ttoe fr»ction of total beat Input
             derlTtd from each typ* of fuel
             (*4 natural gai. bituminou*
             coal, wood residue, etc.)
           th* applicable T or F,. factor for
             each fuel type determined in
             accordance  with  paragraphs
             (f)(4)  and  (J)(S)  of  UxJj
             •ection
           tbe  number  of  faeli  being
             burned In combination.
 •  (g) For the purpose of reports required
 under ! 60.7(c).  periods of excess emis-
 sions that shall  be reported are defined
 as follows:
  (1) Opacity. Excess emissions are de-
fined as any six-minute period during
which the average opacity of emissions
exceeds   20   percent  opacity, except
that one six-minute average per hour
of up to 27  percent  opacity need not
be reported.
   (2) Sulfur dioxide. Kctss emissions
 for affected  facilities are defined as:
   (1)  Any   three-hour  period  during
 which the average emissions (arithmetic
 average of three contiguous one-hour p4-
 riods) of sulfur dioxide as measured by a
 continuous monitoring system exceed the
 applicable standard under { 60.43.
   (ii) [Reserved]
   (3) Nitrogen oxides. Excess emissions
 for affected  facilities using a continuous
 monitoring system for measuring nitro-
 gen oxides are defined as any three-hour
 period during which the average emis-
 sions (arithmetic average ofthree con-
 tiguous one-hour periods) exceed the ap-
 plicable standards under 5 60.44.

 § 60.46  Tesl methods and procedures.
    (a) The reference methods in Appen-
 dix A of this part, except as provided in
 I 60.8'b), shall be used to determine com-
 pliance  with the standards as prescribed
 in 3$ 60.42. 60.43, and 60.44 as follows:
    11) Method 1  for selection of sampling
 site and sample traverses.
   (2) Method 3  for gas analysis  to bs
 used when applying Reference Methods
 5, 6 and 7.
   (3) Method 5 for concentration of par-
 ticulate matter and the associated mois-
 ture content.
   (4) Method 6 for concentration of SO-,
 and
   (5> Method 7 for  concentration of
 NOx.
    For Method 5, Method 1 shall be
 used to  select the sampling site and the
 number  of traverse sampling points. The
 sampling time for each run shall be at
 least SO  minutes  arHtttJ minimum sam-
 pling volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf)
                                                          II-9
                                                                                  except that smaller sampling  times or
                                                                                  volumes, when necessitated  by process
                                                                                  variables .or other factors, may be  ap-
                                                                                  proved by the Administrator. The  probe
                                                                                  and filter holder heating systems in  the
                                                                                  sampling rrain shall be set to provide a.
                                                                                  sas temperature no greater than 160° C
                                                                                  (320= F).
                                                                                    (c>" For Methods 5 and 7, the sampling
                                                                                  site shall  be  the same as that selected
                                                                                  for Method 5. The sampling point in  the
                                                                                  duct shall be at the centroid of the cross
                                                                                  section or at a point  no closer to  the
                                                                                  walls than 1 m (3.28 ft). For Method 6,
                                                                                  the sample shall be extracted at a rate
                                                                                  proportional to the gas velocity at the
                                                                                  sampling point.
                                                                                   '(d)  For Method 6,  the minimum sam-
                                                                                  pling time shall be 20  minutes  and the
                                                                                  minimum  sampling  volume  0.02  dscm
                                                                                  (0.71  dscf) for each sample.  The arith-
                                                                                 metic  mean of two  samples shall  con-
                                                                                 stitute one run. Samples shall be taken
                                                                                 at approximately 30-minute intervals.
                                                                                  •' (e)  For Method 7, each run shall con-
                                                                                 sist of at least four grab samples taken
                                                                                 at approximately  15-minute  intervals.
                                                                                 The  arithmetic mean  of  the samples
                                                                                 shall constitute the run value.
                                                                                   (f)  For each run  using the methods
                                                                                 specified by paragraphs  (a) (3), (4), and
                                                                                 (5)  of this section,  the  emissions  ex-
                                                                                 pressed in g/mil!ion cal  (Ib/million Btu)
                                                                                 shall  be determined  by  the  following
                                                                                 procedure:
                                                                                             CF
                 /    20.
                 \2Q.V-
 where:
   (1) E = pollutant emission g/million cal
 lib/million Btu).
   (2) C = pollutant concentration, g/dscm»
 (Ib/dscf), determined by Methods 5, 6, or 7.
   (3)  riO.  = oxygen content by volume
 (expressed as percent), dry  basis. Percent
 oxygen shall be determined by rslng the In-
 tegrated or  jrab sampling and analysis pro-
 cedures ot Method 3 as applicable. The sam-
 ple shall be obtained as follows:

    (i)  For determination of sulfur diox-
 ide and nitrogen oxides emissions, the
 oxygen sample shall be obtained simul-
 taneously at the  same point in the duct
 as used to obtain the samples for Meth-
 ods 6 and 7 determinations, respectively
 [§ 60.46(c)h For Method  7. the oxygen
 sample shall be obtained using the grab
 sampling  and  analysis  procedures of
 Method 3.
   (ii) For  determination of particulate
 emissions, the oxygen sample  shall be
 obtained simultaneously by  traversing
 the duct at the same  sampling location
 used for each run  of Method  5  under
 paragraph (b)  of this section. Method .1
 shall be used for selection of the number
 of  traverse  points except that no  more
 than 12 sample points are required.
   (4) F =  a factor as determined in
 paragraphs  (f) (4;,  (5) or  (5) of •; 60.45.
   (g) When combinations  of fossil fuels
 ire fired, the heat  input,  expressed in
 cal/hr  (Btu/hr), shall  be  determined
 during each testing period  by multiply-
 ing the  gross calorific value of each fuel
fired  by the rate of each  fuel  burned.
Gross calorific value shall be determined
in  accordance  with A.S.T.AI.  methods
D2015-66(72)  (solid  fuels).  D240-64(73>
 (liquid fuels). or D1826-64(~0>  (gaseous
fuels) as applicable. The rate of  fuels
burned during each  testing  period  shall
be determined bv  suitabls method?  and
shall be  confirmed by a material balance
over the stearr. generation  system.

-------
   Authority: Sec. 111. 301(a) of the Clean Air
 Act a» amended (42 U.S.C. 7411. 7801(a)), and
 additional authority as noted below.

 Subpart Da—Standards  of
 Performance for Electric Utility Steam
 Generating Units for Which
 Construction Is Commenced After
 September 18,1978

 { M.40a  Applicability and designation of
 affected facility.
   (a) The affected facility to which this
 subpart applies is each electric utility
 steam generating unit:
   (1) That is capable of combusting
 more  than 73 megawatts  (250 million
 Btu/hour) heat input of fossil fuel (either
 alone or in combination with any other
 fuel);  and
   (2) For which construction or
 modification is commenced after
 September 18,1978.
   (b) This subpart. applies to electric
 utility combined cycle gas turbines that
 are capable of combusting more than 73
 megawatts (250 million Btu/hour) heat
 input  of fossil fuel in the  steam
 generator. Only emissions resulting from
 combustion of fuels in the steam
 generating unit are subject to this
 subpart (The gas turbine emissions are
 subject to Subpart GG.)
   (c) Any change to an existing fossil-
 fuel-fired steam generating unit to
 accommodate the use of combustible
 materials, other than fossil fuels, shall
 not bring that unit under  the
 applicability of this subpart.
   (d) Any change to an existing steam
 generating unit originally designed to
 fire gaseous or liquid fossil fuels, to
 accommodate the use of any other fuel
 (fossil or nonfossil) shall  not bring that
 unit under the applicability of this
 subpart.

 §60.41a  Definitions.
   As used in this subpart, all terms not
 defined herein shall have the meaning
 given them in the Act and in subpart A
 of this part.
   "Steam generating unit" means any
 furnace, boiler, or other device used for
 combusting fuel for the purpose of
 producing steam (including fossil-fuel-
 fired steam generators associated with
 combined cycle gas turbines; nuclear
 steam generators are not included).
   "Electric utility steam generating unit"
 means any steam electric  generating
 unit that is constructed for the purpose
 of supplying more than one-third of its
 potential electric output capacity and
more than 25 MW electrical output to
any utility power distribution system for
sale. Any steam supplied to a steam
distribution system for the purpose of
providing steam to a steam-electric
 generator that would produce electrical
 energy for sale is also considered in
 determining the electrical energy output
 capacity of the affected facility.
   "Fossil fuel" means natural gas,
 petroleum, coal, and any form of solid,
 liquid, or gaseous fuel derived from such
 material for the purpose of creating
 useful heat.
   "Subbituminous coal" means coal that
 is classified as subbituminous A, B, or C
 according to the American Society of
 Testing and Materials' (ASTM)
 Standard Specification for Classification
 of Coals by Rank D388-68.
   "Lignite" means coal that is classified
 as lignite A or B according to the
 American Society of Testing and
 Materials' (ASTM) Standard
 Specification for Classification of Coals
 by Rank D388-66.
   "Coal refuse" means waste products
 of coal mining, physical coal cleaning,
 and coal preparation operations (e.g.
 culm, gob, etc.) containing coal, matrix
 material, clay, and other organic and
 inorganic material.
   "Potential combustion concentration"
 means the theoretical emissions (ng/J,
 Ib/million Btu heat input) that would
 result from combustion of a fuel in an
 uncleaned state Swithout emission
 control systems) and:
   (a) For participate matter is:
   (1) 3,000 ng/J (7.0 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input for solid fuel; and
   (2) 75 ng/J (0.17 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input for liquid fuels.
   (b) For sulfur dioxide is determined
 under § 60.48a(b).
   (c) For nitrogen oxides is:
   (1) 290 ng/J (0.67 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input for gaseous fuels;
   (2) 310 ng/J (0.72 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input for liquid fuels; and
   (3) 990 ng/J (2.30 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input for solid fuels.
   "Combined cycle gas turbine" means
 a stationary  turbine  combustion system
 where heat from the turbine exhaust
 gases is recovered by a steam
 generating unit.
  "Interconnected" means that two or
 more electric generating units are
 electrically tied together by a network of
 power transmission lines, and other
 power transmission equipment.
  "Electric utility company" means the
 largest interconnected organization,
 business, or governmental entity that
generates electric power for sale (e.g., a
holding company with  operating
subsidiary companies).
  "Principal company" means the
electric utility company or companies
which own the affected facility.
  "Neighboring company" means any
one of those electric utility companies

                11-10
 with one or more electric power
 interconnections to th« principal
 company and which have
 geographically adjoining service areas.
   "Net system capacity" means the sum
 of the net electric generating capability.
 (not necessarily equal to rated capacity)
 of all electric generating equipment
 owned by an electric utility company
 (including steam generating units.
 internal.combustion engines, gas
 turbines, nuclear units, hydroelectric
 units, and all other electric generating
' equipment) plus firm contractual
 purchases that are interconnected to the
 affected facility that has  the
 malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization
 system. The electric generating
 capability of equipment under multiple
 ownership is prorated based on
 ownership unless the proportional
 entitlement to electric output is
 otherwise established by contractual
 arrangement.
   "System load" means the entire
 electric demand of an electric utility
 company's service area interconnected
 with the affected facility  that has the
 malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization
 system plus  firm contractual sales to
 other electric utility companies. Sales to
 other electric utility companies (e.g.,
 emergency power) not on a firm
 contractual basis may also be included
 in the system load  when no available
 system capacity exists in the electric
 utility company to  which the power is
 supplied for  sale.
   "System emergency reserves" means
 an amount of electric generating
 capacity equivalent to the rated
 capacity of the single largest electric
 generating unit in the electric utility
 company (including steam generating
 units, internal combustion engines, gas
 turbines, nuclear units, hydroelectric
 units, and all other electric generating
 equipment) which is interconnected with
 the affected facility that has the
 malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization
 system. The  electric generating
 capability of equipment under multiple
 ownership is prorated based on
 ownership unless the proportional
 entitlement to electric output is
 otherwise established by  contractual
 arrangement.
   "Available system capacity" means
the capacity  determined by subtracting
the system load and the system
emergency reserves from  the net system
capacity.
   "Spinning reserve" means the sum of
the unutilized net generating capability
of all units of the electric utility
company that are synchronized to the
power distribution system and that are
capable of immediately accepting

-------
 additional load. The electric generating
 capability of equipment under multiple
 ownership is prorated based on
 ownership unless the proportional
 entitlement to electric output is
 otherwise established by contractual
 arrangement.
   "Available purchase power" means
 the lesser of the following;
   (a) The sum of available system
 capacity in all neighboring companies.
   (b) The sum of the rated capacities of
 the power interconnection devices
 between the principal company and all
 neighboring companies, minus the sum
 of the electric power load on these
 interconnections.
   (c) The rated capacity of the power
 transmission lines between the power
 interconnection devices and the electric
 generating units (the unit in the principal
 company that has the malfunctioning
 flue gas desulfurization system and the
 unit(s) in the neighboring company
 supplying replacement electrical power)
 less the electric power load on these
 transmission lines.
   "Spare flue gas desulfurization system
 module" means a separate system of
 sulfur dioxide emission control
 equipment capable of treating an
 amount of flue gas equal to the total
 amount of flue gas generated by an
 affected facility when  operated at
 maximum capacity divided by the total
 number of nonspare flue gas
 desulfurization modules in the system.
   "Emergency condition" means that
 period of time when:
   (a) The electric generation output of
 an affected facility with a
 malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization
 system cannot be  reduced or electrical
 output must be increased because:
   (1) All available system capacity in
 the principal company interconnected
 with the affected facility is being
 operated, and
   (2) All available purchase power
 interconnected with the affected facility
 is being obtained, or
   (b) The electric generation demand is
 being shifted as quickly as possible from
 an affected facility with a
 malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization
 system to one or more  electrical
 generating units held in reserve by the
 principal company or by a neighboring
 company, or
  (c) An affected facility with a
 malfunctioning flue gas desulfurization
 system becomes the only available unit
 to maintain a part  or all of the principal
 company's system emergency reserves
 and the unit is operated in spinning
reserve at the lowest practical electric
generation load consistent with not
causing significant physical damage to
 the unit If the unit is operated, at a
 higher load to meet load demand, an
 emergency condition would not exist
 unless the conditions under (a) of this
 definition apply.
   "Electric utility combined cycle gas
 turbine" means any combined cycle gas
 turbine used for electric generation that
 'Is constructed for the purpose of
 supplying more than one-third of its
 potential electric output capacity and
 more than 25 MW electrical output to
 any utility power distribution system for
 sale. Any steam distribution system that
 is constructed for the purpose of
 providing steam to a steam electric
 generator that would produce electrical
 power for sale is also considered in
 determining the electrical energy output
 capacity of the  affected facility.
   "Potential electrical output capacity"
 is defined as 33 percent of the maximum
 design heat input capacity of the steam
 generating unit (e.g., a steam generating
- unit with a 100-MW (340 million Btu/hr)
 fossil-fuel heat  input capacity would
 have a 33-MW potential electrical
 output capacity). For electric utility
 combined cycle gas turbines the
 potential electrical output capacity is
 determined on the basis of the fossil-fuel
 firing capacity of the steam generator
 exclusive of the heat input and electrical
 power contribution by the gas turbine.
   "Anthracite" means coal that is
 classified as anthracite according to the
 American Society of Testing and
 Materials' (ASTM) Standard
 Specification for Classification of Coals
 by Rank D388-66.
 . "Solid-derived fuel" means any solid,
 liquid, or gaseous fuel derived from solid
 fuel for the purpose  of creating useful
 heat and includes, but is not limited to,
 solvent refined  coal, liquified coal, and
 gasified coal.
   "24-hour period" means the period of
 time between 12:01 a.m. and 12:00
 midnight.
   "Resource recovery unit" means a
 facility that combusts more than 75
 percent non-fossil fuel on a quarterly
 (calendar) heat  input basis.
   "Noncontinental area" means the
 State  of Hawaii, the Virgin Islands,
 Guam, American Samoa, the
 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the
 Northern Mariana Islands.
   "Boiler operating day" means a 24-
 hour period during which fossil fuel is
 combusted in a steam generating unit for
 the entire 24 hours.

 § 60.42a  Standard (or participate matter.
   (a) On and after the date on which the
 performance  test required to be
 conducted under § 60.8 is completed, no
 owner or operator subject to the
                      11-11
 provisions ot this subpar: i..-.. ~^*>*<- M
 be discharged into the atmosphere from
 any affected facility any gases which
 contain particulate matter in excess of:
   (1) 13 ng/J (0.03 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input derived frpm the combustion of
 solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel;
   (2) 1 percent of the potential
 combustion concentration (99 percent
 reduction) when combusting solid fuel;
 and
   (3) 30 percent of potential combustion
 concentration (70 percent reduction)
 when combusting liquid fuel.
   (b) On and after the date the
 particulate matter performance test
 required to be conducted under § 60.8 is
 completed, no owner or operator subject
 to the provisions of this subpart shall
 cause to be  discharged into the
 atmosphere from any affected facility
 any gases which exhibit greater than 20
 percent opacity (6-minute average),
 except for one 6-minute period per hour
 of not more than 27 percent opacity.

 § 60.43a  Standard for sulfur dioxide.
   (a) On and after the date on which the
 initial performance test required to be
 conducted under § 60.8 is completed, no
 owner or operator subject to the
 provisions of this subpart shall cause to
 be discharged into the atmosphere from
 any affected facility which combusts
.solid fuel or solid-derived fuel, except as
 provided under paragraphs (c), (d), (f) or
 (h) of this section, any gases which
 contain sulfur dioxide in excess of:
  (1) 520 ng/J (1-20 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input  and 10 percent of the potential
 combustion concentration (90 percent
 reduction), or
  (2) 30 percent of the potential
 combustion concentration (70 percent
 reduction), when emissions are less than
 260 ng/J (0.60 Ib/milliori Btu) heat input.
  (b) On and after the date on which the
 initial performance test required to be
 conducted under § 60.8 is completed, no
 owner or operator subject to the
 provisions of this subpart shall cause to
 be discharged into the atmosphere from
 any affected facility which combusts
 liquid or gaseous fuels (except for liquid
 or gaseous fuels derived from  solid fuels
 and as provided under paragraphs (e) or
 (h) of this section), any gases which
 contain sulfur dioxide in excess of:
  (1) 340 ng/J (0.80 Ib/million Btu) heat
 input and 10 percent of the potential
 combustion concentration (90 percent
reduction), or
  (2) 100 percent of the potential
combustion concentration (zero percent
reduction) when emissions are less than
86 ng/J (0.20 Ib/million Btu) heat input.
  (c) On and after the date on which the
initial performance test required to be

-------
  conducted under § 60.8 is complete, no
  owner or operator subject to the
  provisions of this subpart shall cause to
  be discharged into the atmosphere from
  any affected facility which combusts
  solid solvent refined coal (SRC-I) any
  gases which contain sulfur dioxide in
  excess of 520 ng/J (1.20 Ib/million Btu)
  heat input and 15 percent of the
  potential combustion concentration (85
  percent reduction) except as provided
  under paragraph (f) of this section;
  compliance with the emission limitation
  is determined on a 30-day rolling
  average basis and compliance with the
  percent reduction requirement is
  determined on a 24-hour basis.
    (d) Sulfur dioxide emissions are
  limited  to 520 ng/J (1.20 Ib/million Btu)
  heat input from any affected facility
  which:
    (1) Combusts 100 percent anthracite,
    (2) Is  classified as a resource recovery
  facility, or
    (3) Is  located in a noncontinental area
  and combusts solid fuel or solid-derived
  fuel.
    (e] Sulfur dixoide emissions are
  limited  to 340 ng/J (0.80 Ib/million Btu)
  heat input from any affected facility
  which is located in a noncontinental
'  area and combusts liquid or gaseous
  fuels (excluding solid-derived fuels).
    (f) The emission reduction
  requirements under this section do not
  apply to any affected facility that is
  operated under an SO: commercial
  demonstration permit issued by the
  Administrator in accordance with-the
  provisions of § 60.45a.
    (g) Compliance with the emission
  limitation and percent reduction
  requirements under this section are both
  determined on a 30-day rolling average
  basis except as provided under
  paragraph (c) of this section.
    (h) When different fuels are
  combusted simultaneously, the
  applicable standard is determined by
  proration using the following formula:
    (1) If emissions of sulfur dioxide to the
  atmosphere are greater than 260 ng/J
  (0.60 Ib/million Btu) heat input
  EM,  = [340 x + 520 y]/100 and
  Pjo,  — 10 percent

    (2) It' emissions of sulfur dioxide to the
  atmosphere are equal to  or less than 260
 ng/J (0.60 Ib/million Btu) heat input:
 E»,  =  [340 x + 520 y]/100 and
 P»o, =  [90 x + 70 yj/100
 where:
 ESO, la the prorated sulfur dioxide emission
    limit (ng/J heat input),
 Pgo, is the percentage of potential sulfur
    dioxide emission allowed (percent
    reduction required = 100-PW>),
 x i» the percentage of total henl input derived
    from the combustion of liquid or gaseous
    fuels (excluding solid-derived fuels)
 y is the percentage of total heat inpul derived
    from the combustion of solid fuel
    (including solid-derived fuels)

 § 60.44a  Standard for nitrogen oxides.
   (a) On and after the date on which the
 initial performance test required to be
 conducted under | 60.8 is completed, no
 owner or operator subject to the
 provisions of this subpart shall cause to
 be discharged into the atmosphere from
 any  affected facility, except as provided
 under paragraph (b) of this section, any
 gases which contain nitrogen oxides in
 excess of the following emission limits,
 based on a 30-day rolling average.
   (1) NO, Emission Limits—
          Fuel type
                         '  Emission SrnH
                         ng/J (Os/mUlwo Btu)
                            heal input
Gaseous Fuels:
   CoeMferived fuels -
   AS other fuels	
Liquid Fuels:
   CoeMJerwed fuels -
   Snalooi	
   A» other fuels	
Soid Fuels:
                                    (0.50)
                             210
                             210     (0.50)
                             210     (0.50)
                             130     (0.30)
    CoaMenved fuels	
    Any fuel contanng more man
     25%, by weight, coal refuse .
                             210
                                    (0.50)
    Any fuel containing more than
     25%. by weight, lignite it me
     ignite is mined m Norm
     Dakota. South Dakota, or
     Montana, and 8 combusted
     in a stag lap furnace	
    Lignite not subject to the 340
     ng/J heat input emission limit
                        Exempt from NO,
                         standards and NO,
                         monltoong
                         fsojuvsfnents
    Anthracite <
                            340

                            260
                            210
                            260
                            260
                            280
(0*))

(0.60)
(0-SO)
(0.60)
(0.60)
(0.60)
   (2) NO, reduction requirements—
         Fuel type
                         Percwil reduction
                           01 potential
                           combustion
                          concentration
 Gaseous fuels-
 Liquid fuels	
 Solid fuels	
                                   25%
                                   30%
                                   65%
   (b) The emission limitations under
paragraph (a) of this section do not
•apply to any affected facility which is
combusting coal-derived liquid fuel and
is operating under a commercial
demonstration permit issued by the
Administrator in accordance with the
provisions of § 60.45a.
   (c) When two or more fuels are
combusted simultaneously, the
applicable standard is determined by
proration using the following formula:
Em, = [86 w+130 x+210 y+260 z]/100
 where:
 ENO, is the applicable standard for nitrogen
    'oxides when multiple fuels are
    combusted simultaneously (ng/J heat
    input):
 w is the percentage of total heat input
    derived from the combustion of fuels
    subject to the 86 ng/J heat input
    standard;
 x is the percentage of total heat input derived
    from the combustion of fuels subject to
    the 130 ng/J heat input standard:
 y is the percentage of total heat input derived
    from the combustion of fuels subject to
    the 210 ng/J heat input standard; and
 2 is the percentage of total heat input derived
    from the combustion of fuels subject to
    the 260-ng/J heat input standard.

 § 60.45a  ^Commercial demonstration
 permit
   (a) An owner or operator of an
 affected facility proposing to
 demonstrate an emerging technology
 may apply to the Administrator for a
 commercial demonstration permit. The
 Administrator will issue a Commercial
 demonstration permit in accordance
 with paragraph (e) of this section.   '
 Commercial demonstration permits may
 be issued only by the Administrator,
 and this authority will not be delegated.
   (b) An owner or operator of an
 affected facility that combusts solid
 solvent refined coal (SRC-I) and who is
 issued a commercial demonstration
 permit by the Administrator is not
 subject to the SO? emission reduction
 requirements under § 60.43a(c) but must,
 as a minimum, reduce SO» emissions to
 20 percent of the potential combustion
 concentration (80 percent reduction] for
 each 24-hour period of steam generator
 operation and to less than 520 ng/J (1.20
 Ib/million Btu) heat input on a 30-day
 rolling average basis.
   (c) An owner or operator of a fluidized
 bed combustion electric utility steam
 generator (atmospheric or pressurized]
 who is issued a commercial
 demonstration permit by the
 Administrator is not subject to the S0>
 emission reduction requirements under
 S 60.43a(a) but must, as a minimum,
 reduce SO, emissions to 15 percent of
 the potential combustion concentration
 (85 percent reduction) on a 30-day
 rolling average basis and to less than
 520 ng/J (1.20 Ib/million Btu) heat input
 on a 30-day rolling average basis.
   (d) The owner or operator of an
 affected facility that combusts coal-
 derived liquid fuel and who is issued a
 commercial demonstration permit by the
Administrator is not subject to the
applicable NO, emission limitation and
percent reduction  under § 60.44a(a) but
must, as a minimum, reduce emissions
to less than 300 ng/J (0.70 Ib/million Btu)
                                                        11-12

-------
 heat input on a 30-day rolling average
 basis.
   (e) Commercial demonstration permits
 may not exceed the following equivalent
 MW electrical generation capacity for
 any one technology category, and the
 total equivalent MW electrical
 generation capacity for all commercial
 demonstration plants may not exceed
 15.000 MW.
                     Mutant
                               alactncal
                               capacity
                              (UWdwmcal
                               output)
SoM iotw
-------
potential sulfur dioxide emissions in
place of a continuous sulfur dioxide
emission monitor at the inlet to the
sulfur dioxide control device as required
under paragraph (b)(l) of this section.
   (c) The owner or operator of an
affected facility shall install, calibrate,
maintain, and operate a continuous
monitoring system, and record the
output of the system, for measuring
nitrogen oxides emissions discharged to
the atmosphere.
   (d) The owner or operator of an
affected facility shall install, calibrate,
maintain, and operate a continuous
monitoring system, and record the
output of the system, for measuring the
oxygen or carbon dioxide content of the
flue gases at each location where sulfur
dioxide or nitrogen oxides emissions are
monitored.
   (e) The continuous monitoring
systems under  paragraphs (b), (c), and
(d) of this section are operated and data
recorded during all periods of operation
of the affected  facility including periods
of startup, shutdown, malfunction or
emergency conditions, except for
continuous monitoring system
breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks,
and zero and span adjustments.
   (f) When emission data are not
obtained because of continuous
monitoring system breakdowns, repairs,
calibration checks and zero and span
adjustments, emission data will be
obtained by using other monitoring
systems as approved by_the
Administrator or the reference methods
as described in paragraph (h) of this
section to provide emission data  for a
minimum of 18  hours in at least 22 out of
30 successive boiler operating days.
   (g) The 1-hour averages required  -
under paragraph § 60.13(h) are
expressed in ng/J.(lbs/million Btu] heat
input and used  to calculate  the average
emission rates under | 60.46a. The 1-
hour averages are calculated using the
data points required under § 60.13(b). At
least two data points must be used to
calculate the 1-hour averages.
   (h) Reference methods used to
supplement continuous monitoring
system data to meet the minimum data
requirements in paragraph 5 60.47a(f)
will be used as  specified below or
otherwise approved by the
Administrator.
   (1) Reference Methods 3, 6, and 7, as
applicable, are used. The sampling
location(s) are the same as those  used
for the continuous monitoring system.
  (2) For Method 6, the minimum
sampling time is 20 minutes  and the
minimum sampling volume is 0.02 dscm
(0.71 dscf) for each sample. Samples are
taken at approximately 60-minute
intervals. Each sample represents a 1-
hour average.
  (3) For Method 7, samples are taken at
approximately 30-minute intervals. The
arithmetic average of these two
consective samples represent a 1-hour
average.
  ,(4) For Method 3, the oxygen or
carbon dioxide sample is to be taken for
each hour when continuous SOj and
NO, data are taken or when Methods 6
and 7 are required. Each sample shall be
taken for a minimum of 30 minutes in
each hour using the integrated bag
method specified in Method 3. Each
sample represents  a 1-hour average.
  (5) For each 1-hour average, the
emissions expressed in ng/J (Ib/million
Btu) heat input are determined and used
as needed to achieve the minimum data
requirements of paragraph (f) of this
section.
  (i) The following procedures are used
to conduct monitoring system
performance evaluations under
§ 60.13(c) and calibration checks under
§ 60.13(d).
  (1) Reference method 6 or 7, as
applicable, is used for conducting
performance evaluations of sulfur
dioxide and nitrogen oxides continuous
monitoring systems.
  (2) Sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides,
as applicable, is used for preparing
calibration gas mixtures under
performance specification Z of appendix
B to this part.
  (3) For affected facilities burning only.
fossil fuel, the span value for a
continuous monitoring system for
measuring opacity is between 60 and 80
percent and for a continuous monitoring
system measuring nitrogen oxides is
determined as follows:
        faaitual
                          Span vaJua for
                       nitrogen oxides (ppffi)
Gu.
SoM	
Combination...
         soo
         500
        1,000
500(x+y) + 1.000z
where:
x is the fraction of total heat input derived
    from gaseous fossil fuel,
y is the fraction of total heat input derived
   . from liquid fossil fuel and
z is the fraction of total heat input derived
    from solid fossil fuel.

  (4) All span values computed under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section for
burning combinations of fossil fuels are
rounded to the nearest 500 ppm.
  (5) For affected facilities burning fossil
fuel, alone or in combination with non-
fossil  fuel, the span value of the sulfur
dioxide continuous monitoring system at
the inlet to  the sulfur dioxide control
                      11-14
 device is 125 percent of the maximum
 estimated hourly potential emissions of
 the fuel fired, and the outlet of the sulfur
 dioxide control device is 50 percent of
 maximum estimated hourly potential
 emissions of the fuel fired.
 (Sec. 114. Clean Air Act as amended (42
 U.S.C. 7414).)

 j 60.48a  Compliance determination
 procedures and methods.
   (a) The following procedures and
 reference methods are used to determine
 compliance with the standards for
 particulate matter under § 60.42a.
   (1) Method 3 is used for gas analysis
 when applying method 5 or method 17.
   (2) Method 5 is used for determining
 participate matter emissions and
 associated moisture content. Method 17
 may be used for stack gas temperatures
 less than 160 C (320 F).
   (3) For Methods 5 or 17, Method 1 is
 used to select the sampling site and the
 number of traverse sampling points. The
 sampling time for each run is at least 120
 minutes and the minimum sampling
 volume is 1.7 dscm (60 dscf) except that
 smaller sampling times or volumes,
 when necessitated by process variables
 or other factors, may be approved by the
 Administrator.
'  (4) For Method 5, the probe and filter
 holder heating system in the sampling
 train is set to provide a gas temperature- -
 no greater than 160'C t32°F).
   (5) For determination of particulate
• emissions, the oxygen or carbon-dioxide
 sample is obtained simultaneously with
 each run of Methods 5 or 17 by
 traversing the duct at the same sampling
 location. Method 1 is used for selection
 of the number of traverse points except
 that no more than 12 sample points are
 required.
   (6) For each run using Methods 5 or 17,
 the emission rate  expressed in ng/J heat
 input is determined  using the oxygen or
 carbon-dioxide measurements and
 particulate matter measurements
 obtained under this  section, the dry
 basis'Fc-factor and the dry basis
 emission rate calculation procedure
 contained in Method 19 (Appendix A).
   (7) Prior to  the Administrator's
 issuance of a particulate matter
 reference method that does not
 experience sulfuric acid mist
 interference problems, particulate
 matter emissions may be  sampled prior
 to a wet flue gas desulfurization system.
   (b) The following procedures and
 methods are used to determine
 compliance with the sulfur dioxide
 standards under § 60.43a.
   (1) Determine the percent of potential
 combustion concentration (percent PCC)
 emitted to the atmosphere as follows:

-------
   (i) Fuel Pretreatment (% Rf):
 Determine the percent reduction
 achieved by any fuel pretreatraent using
 the procedures in Method 19 (Appendix
 A). Calculate the average percent
 reduction for fuel pretreatment on a
 quarterly basis using fuel analysis data.
 The determination of percent R( to.
 calculate the percent of potential
 combustion concentration emitted to the
 atmosphere is optional. For purposes of
 determining compliance with any
 percent reduction requirements under
 S 60.43a, any reduction in potential SO>
 emissions resulting from the following
 processes may be credited:
   (A) Fuel pretreatment (physical coal
 cleaning, hydrodesulfurization of fuel
 oil, etc.),
   (B) Coal pulverizers, and
   (C) Bottom and flyash interactions.
   (ii) Sulfur Dioxide Contrbl System (%
 ft,): Determine the percent sulfur
 dioxide reduction achieved by any
 sulfur dioxide control system using
 emission rates measured before and
 after the control system, following the
 procedures in Method 19 (Appendix A);
 or, a combination of an "as fired" fuel
• monitor and emission rates measured
 after the control system, following the
 procedures in Method 19 (Appendix A].
 When the "as fired" fuel monitor is
 used, the percent reduction  is calculated
 using the average emission  rate from the
 sulfur dioxide control device and the
 average SO» input rate from the "as
 fired" fuel analysis for 30 successive
 boiler operating days.
   (iii) Overall percent reduction (% Re):
 Determine the overall percent reduction
 using the results obtained in paragraphs
 (b)(l) (i) and (ii) of this section following
 the procedures in Method 19 (Appendix
 A). Results are calculated for each 30-
 day period using the quarterly average
percent sulfur reduction determined for
fuel pretreatment from the previous
quarter and the sulfur dioxide reduction
achieved by a sulfur dioxide control
system for each 30-day period in the
current quarter.
   (iv) Percent emitted (% FCC):
Calculate the percent of potential
combustion concentration emitted to the
atmosphere using the following
equation: Percent PCC=100-Percent R,
   (2) Determine the sulfur dioxide
emission rates following the procedures
in Method 19 (Appendix A).
  (c) The procedures and methods
outlined in Method 19 (Appendix A) are
used in conjunction with the 30-day
nitrogen-oxides emission data collected
under \ 60.47a to determine compliance
with the applicable nitrogen  oxides
standard under § 60.44.
   (d) Electric utility combined cycle gas
 turbines are performance tested for
 participate matter, sulfur dioxide, and
 nitrogen oxides using the procedures of
 Method 19 (Appendix A). The sulfur
 dioxide and nitrogen oxides emission
 rates from the gas turbine used in
 Method 19 (Appendix A) calculations
 are determined when the gas turbine is
 performance tested under subpart GG.
 The potential uncontrolled participate
 matter emission rate from a gas turbine
 is defined as 17 ng/J (0.04 Ib/million Btu)
 heat-input

 { 60.49a  Reporting requirements.
   (a) For sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides,
 and particulate matter emissions, the
 performance test data from the initial
 performance test and from the
 performance evaluation of the
 continuous monitors (including the
 transmissometer) are submitted to the
 Administrator.
   (b) For sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
 oxides the following information is
 reported to the Administrator for each
 24-hour j>eriod.
   (1) Calendar date.
   (2) The average sulfur dioxide and
 nitrogen oxide emission rates (ng/J or
 Ib/million Btu) for each 30 successive
 boiler operating days, ending with the
 last 30-day period in the quarter
 reasons for non-compliance with the
 emission  standards; and, description of
 corrective actions taken.
   (3) Percent reduction of the potential
 combustion concentration of sulfur
 dioxide for each 30 successive boiler
 operating days, ending with the last 30-
 day period in the quarter; reasons for
 non-compliance with the standard; and,
 description of corrective actions taken.
   (4) Identification of the boiler
 operating days for which pollutant or •
 dilutent data have not been obtained by
 an approved method for at least 18
 hours of operation of the facility;
 justification for not obtaining  sufficient
 data; and description of corrective
 actions taken.
   (5) Identification of the times when
 emissions data have been excluded from
 the calculation of average emission
 rates because of startup, shutdown,
 malfunction (NO, only), emergency
 conditions (SOi only), or other reasons,
 and justification for excluding data for
 reasons other than startup, shutdown,
 malfunction, or emergency conditions.
  (6) Identification of "F1 factor used for
 calculations, method of determination,
 and type of fuel combusted.
  (7) Identification of times when hourly
averages have been obtained based on
manual sampling methods.
    (8) Identification of the times wnen
  the pollutant concentration exceeded
  full span of the continuous monitoring
  system.
    (9) Description of any modifications to
  the continuous monitoring system which
  could affect the ability  of the continuous
  monitoring system to comply with
-  Performance Specifications 2 or 3.
    (c) If the minimum quantity of
  emission data as required by § 60.47a is
  not obtained for any 30 successive
  boiler operating days, the following
  information obtained under the
  requirements of § 80.46a(h) is reported
  to the Administrator for that 30-day
  period:
    (1) The number of hourly averages
  available for outlet emission rates (n,)
  and inlet emission rates (nj as
  applicable.
    (2) The standard deviation of hourly
  averages for outlet emission rates (s0)
  and inlet emission rates (sj as
  applicable.
    (3) The lower confidence limit for the
  mean outlet emission rate (E,*) and the
  upper confidence  limit for the mean inlet
  emission rate (E,*) as applicable.
    (4) The applicable potential
  combustion concentration.
    (5) The ratio of the upper confidence
  limit for the mean outlet emission rate
  (E,,*) and the allowable emission rate
  (£«,,) as applicable.
    (d) If any standards under § 60,43a are
  exceeded during emergency conditions
  because of control system malfunction.
  the owner or operator of the affected
  facility shall submit  a signed statement:
   (1) Indicating if emergency conditions
  existed and requirements under
  § 60.46a(d) were met during each period,
  and
   (2) Listing the following information:
   (i) Time periods the emergency
  condition existed;
   (ii) Electrical output and demand on
  the owner or operator's electric utility  •
 system and the affected facility:
   (iii) Amount of power purchased from
 interconnected neighboring utility
 companies during  the emergency period:
   (iv) Percent reduction in emissions
 achieved;
   Iv) Atmospheric emission rate (ng/J)
 of the pollutant discharged; and
   (vi) Actions taken  to correct control
 system malfunction.
   (e) If fuel pretreatment credit toward
 the sulfur dioxide emission standard
 under § 80.43a is claimed, the owner or
 operator of the affected facility shall
 submit a signed statement
'  (1) Indicating what percentage
 cleaning credit was taken for the
 calendar quarter, and whether the credit
was determined in accordance with the

-------
 provisions of § 60.48a and Metnod 1!
 (Appendix A): and
   (2) Listing the quantity, heat content
 and date each pretreated fuel shipment
 was received during the previous
 quarter; the name and location of the
 fuel pretrealment facility; and the total
 quantity and total heat  content of all
 fuels received at the affected facility
 during the previous quarter.
   (f) For any periods for which opacity,
 sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxides
 emissions data are not available, the
 owner or operator of the affected facility
 shall submit a signed statement
 indicating if any changes were made in
 operation of the emission control system
 during the period of data unavailability.
 Operations of the control system and
 affected facility during periods of data
 unavailability are to be compared  with
 operation of the control system and
 affected facility before and following the
 period of data unavailability.
   (g) The owner or operator of the
 affected facility shall submit a signed
 statement indicating whether:
   (1) The required continuous
 monitoring system calibration, span, and
 drift checks or other periodic audits
 have or have not been performed as
 specified.
   (2} The data used to show compliance
 was or was not obtained in accordance
 with approved methods and procedures
 of this part and is representative of
 plant performance.
   (3) The minimum data requirements
 have or have not been met; or, the
 minimum data requirements have not
 been met for errors that were
 unavoidable.         ,
   (4) Compliance with the standards has
 or has not been achieved during the
 reporting period.              "
   (h) For the purposes of the reports
 required under § 60.7, periods of excess
 emissions are defined as all 6-minute
 periods during which the average
 opacity exceeds the applicable opacity
 standards under § 60.42a(b). Opacity
 levels in excess of the applicable
 opacity standard and the date of such
 excesses are to be submitted to  the
 Administrator each calendar quarter.
   (i) The owner or operator of an
 affected facility shall submit the written
 reports required under this section and
 subpart A to the Administrator for every
 calendar quarter. AJ1 quarterly reports
 shall be postmarked by the 30th day
following the end of each calendar
quarter.
(Sec. 114. Clean Air Act  38 amended (42
U.S.C 7414).)
                                                         11-16

-------
        ft— -Standards of Performance for
           Nitric Add Plant*
6 60.70  Applicability and designation of
     affected facility.
  <•) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to each nitric acid production
unit, which is the affected facility.
  cea«Kld<».
   (a) On and after the date on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted by | 60.8 Is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cause to be discharged
 into the atmosphere from any affected
 facility any gases which:
   (1) Contain  nitrogen  oxides,   ex-
 pressed as NO,, in excess of 1.5 kg per
 metric ton of add produced (3.0 Ib per
 ton), the production being expressed as
 100 percent nitric acid,
   (2) Exhibit  10  percent  opacity,  or
 greater.
 | 60.73  Emiation monitoring.
   (a)  A continuous  monitoring system
 for the measurement of nitrogen oxides
 tftan be installed, calibrated, maintained,
 and operated by the owner or operator.
 The pollutant gas used to prepare cali-
 bration gas  mixtures under paragraph
 2 1 Performance Specification  2 and for
 calibration  checks under 1 60.13(d) to
 this part, s>»*n be nitrogen dioxide (NO.) .
 The span shall be set at 500 ppm of nitro-
gen dioxide. Reference Method  7  shall
 be used for conducting monitoring sy«-
 tem performance evaluations nrifitx  I 60.-
   (c.                  t   .  „  .  .
   (D) The owner or operator shall estab-
 lish a conversion factor for the purpose
 of converting monitoring data Into units
 of the applicable standard (kg/metric
 ton Ib/short ton) . The conversion factor
 •hail be established by measuring emls-
 aions with  the  continuous  monitoring
 iystem concurrent with measuring emls-
 cions with the applicable reference meth-
 od tests Using only that portion of the
 continuous  monitoring  emission  data
 that represents emission measurements
 concurrent  with the reference method
 test periods, the conversion factor than
                                       References:

                                         60.2
                                         60.7
                                         60.8
                                         60.11
                                         60.13
                                         Reference  Method 7
                                         Specification  2
                                                          11-17

-------
•ubpart H—Standard* of PtrfornMnc* for
          Sulfuric Add Plants
| 60.80  Applicability and deaicnation of
     affected facility.
  (a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to each sulfuric acid produc-
tion unit, which Is the affected facility. .
   converter. Ap-
       propriate  correction*  must be made
       for air Injection plant* subject to tbe
       Administrator's approval.
   a  = percentage of sulfur  dioxide by vol-
       ume In tbe emission* to tbe atmoi-
       pbere determined by  tbe continuous
       monitoring lyitem  required  under
       paragraph  (a) of this section.

   (c)  The owner or operator shall  re-
cord all conversion factors and values un-
der paragraph (b) of this section from
which they were computed (Le., CF. r,
and »)•
   (d) [Reserved]
   (e1  For  the purpose of  reports under
I 60.7 (c),  periods  of excess emissions
ah&ll be all three-hour periods  (or  the
arithmetic average of three consecutive
oue-hour periods) during  which the in-
tegrated average sulfur dioxide emissions
exceed the applicable standards under
I 60.82.
 (See. 114 at the Oeaa Air Act aa
 (43 VAC. l«7e-«).).
§ 60.84  Emission monitoring.
  (a) A continuous monitoring  system
for the measurement  of sulfur dioxide
shall be installed, calibrated, maintained,
and operated by the owner or operator.
The pollutant gas used to prepare cali-
bration gas mixtures  under paragraph
2.1, Performance Specification 2 and for
calibration  checks  under  |60.13(d),
shall be sulfur dioxide (SO>). Reference
Method 8 shall be used for conducting
monitoring system performance evalua-
tions under J 60.13(0  except that only
the sulfur dioxide portion of the Method
8 results shall be used. The span shall be
set at 1000 ppm of sulfur dioxide.
  (b) The owner or operator shall estab-
lish a conversion factor  for the purpose
of converting monitoring data into units
of  the  applicable standard (kg/metric
ton, Ib/ahort ton). The  conversion lae-
                                                           11-18
                                       References:

                                         60.2
                                         60.7
                                         60.8
                                         60.11
                                         60.13
                                         Reference  Method  8
                                         Specification  2

-------
$60.100  Applicability and designation of
   .affected facility.
  (a)  The provisions of  this subpart
are applicable to the following  affect-
ed  facilities in petroleum refineries:
fluid  catalytic cracking unit catalyst
regenerators, fuel gas combustion de-
vices, and  all  Claus sulfur  recovery
plants except Claus plants of 20 long
tons per day (LTD) or  less associated
with a small petroleum refinery. The
Claus sulfur recovery plant need  not
be  physically  located  within   the
boundaries of a petroleum refinery to
be an affected facility, provided  it pro-
cesses gases produced within a  petro-
leum refinery.
  (b) Any fluid catalytic cracking unit
catalyst regenerator of fuel gas com-
bustion  device under paragraph (a) of
this  section which commences  con-
struction  or modification after June
11, 1973, or any Claus sulfur recovery
plant  under paragraph  (a) of this sec-
tion which commences construction or
modification after October 4. 1976, is
subject  to the  requirements of  this
part.
  (h) "Coke  burn-off" means the coke
removed from the surface of the fluid
catalytic cracking unit catalyst by com-
bustion  In the catalyst regenerator. The
rate of coke burn-off Is calculated by the
formula specified In f 60.106.
  (1)  "Claus  sulfur  recovery plant"
means  a process unit which recovers
sulfur  from  hydrogen  sulflde  by a
vapor-phase   catalytic   reaction  of
sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulflde.
  (j)   "Oxidation   control   system"
means  an  emission  control  system
which  reduces emissions from sulfur
recovery plants  by converting these
emissions to sulfur dioxide.
  (k)   "Reduction  control   system"
means  an  emission  control  system
which  reduces emissions from sulfur
recovery plants  by converting these
emissions to hydrogen sulflde.
  (1) "Reduced  sulfur  compounds"
mean hydrogen sulflde (E>S), carbonyl
sulfide  (COS) and  carbon  dlsulfide
(CS,).
  (m)   "Small  petroleum  refinery"
means a petroleum refinery which has
a  crude oil  processing  capacity  of
50,000 barrels per stream day or less.
and which is owned or controlled by a
refinery with a total  combined crude
•11 processing capacity of 137,500 bar-
Mis per stream day or less.
140.101  Definition*.
  As used In this subpart, all terms not
defined herein shall have the  meaning
given them In the Act and In Subpart A.
  (a) "Petroleum  refinery" means any
facility engaged In producing  gasoline,
kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel
oils,  lubricants,  or  other   products
through distillation  of petroleum or
through redistillation, cracking  or  re-
forming   of   unfinished   petroleum
derivatives.
  (b) "Petroleum" means the crude ofl
removed from the  earth and the oils de-
rived from tar sands, shale, and coal.
  (c) "Process gas" means any gas gen-
erated by  a  petroleum refinery process
unit, except  fuel gas  and process upset
gas as defined In this section.
  (d) "fuel  gas" means any gas which
is generated  by a  petroleum refinery
process unit and which Is combusted. In-
cluding any gaseous mixture of natural
gas and fuel gas which Is combusted.
  (e) "Process upset gas" means any gas
generated by a petroleum refinery process
unit as a result of start-up, shut-down.
upset or malfunction.
  (f) "Refinery process unit" means any
segment of the petroleum  refinery In
which  a specific processing operation to
conducted.
  (g) "Fuel  gas  combustion   device"
means any equipment, such as process
beaters, boilers and flares used to com-
bust fuel gas, but does not Include fluid
coking unit and fluid catalytic cracking
unit incinerator-waste heat boilers or fa-
cilities in which gases are combusted to
produce sulfur or sulfurlc acid.
J 60.102  Standard for particulate matter.
  (a) On and after the date on which
the performance test required  to be
conducted  by } 60.8  is completed,  no
owner or operator subject to the provi-
sions of this subpart shall discharge or
cause the  discharge  Into  the  atmos-
phere from any fluid catalytic crack-
ing unit catalyst regenerator:

     *****

   (S)  One* exhibiting greater than 10
 percent opacity, except for one six-mln-
 ote average opacity reading in any one
 hour period.
S 60.104  Standard for sulfur dioxide.
  (a) On and after the date on which
the performance  test required to be
conducted by §60.8 is completed, no
owner or operator subject to the provi-
sions of this subpart shall:
  (1) Burn in any fuel gas combustion
device any fuel gas which contains hy-
drogen  sulfide in excess of 230  mg/
dscm (0.10 gr/dscf),  except  that the
gases resulting from the combustion of
fuel gas  may  be  treated to  control
sulfur dioxide emissions provided the
owner or operator demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the Administrator  that
this is as effective in preventing sulfur
dioxide emissions to the  atmosphere
as restricting the H, concentration in
the fuel gas to 230 mg/dscm  or  less.
The combustion  in a  flare of  process
upset gas, or fuel gas which is released
to the flare as a result of relief valve
leakage, is exempt from this para-
graph.
                                        (2) Discharge or cause the discharge
                                      of any gases into the atmosphere from
                                      any Claus sulfur recovery  plant  con-
                                      taining in excess of:
                                        (i) 0.025 percent by volume of sulfur
                                      dioxide at zero percent oxygen on a
                                      -dry basis if emissions are controlled by
                                      an oxidation control system, or a re-
                                      duction control system Jollowed by in-
                                      cineration, or
                                        (11) 0.030  percent  by volume of re-
                                      •duced sulfur compounds  and  0.0010
                                      percent by volume of hydrogen sulfide
                                      calculated as sulfur dioxide at  zero
                                      percent oxygen on a dry basis if emis-
                                      sions are  controlled by  a  reduction
                                      control system not  followed by incin-
                                      eration.
                                        (b) [Reserved]
 * 60.105   F,mi»»lon monitoring,
   (a)  Continuous  monitoring  systems
 shall be installed, calibrated, maintained,
 and operated by the owner or operator as
 follows:
   (1)  A continuous monitoring system
 for  the measurement of the opacity of
 emissions discharged into the atmosphere
 from the fluid catalytic cracking unit cat-
 alyst regenerator. The continuous moni-
 toring system shall be spanned at 60. 70.
 or 80 percent opacity.
  (2) An instrument for continuously
 monitoring and recording the concen-
 tration of carbon monoxide in gases
 discharged into the atmosphere from
 fluid catalytic  cracking unit catalyst
 regenerators. The span of this  con-
 tinuous  monitoring  system  shall  be
 1,000 ppm.
   (3) A continuous  monitoring system
 for the measurement of sulfur dioxide in
 the gases discharged into the atmosphere
 from the combustion of fuel gases (ex-
 cept where a continuous monitoring sys-
 tem for the measurement of hydrogen
 sulfide Is installed under paragraph (a)
 (4)  of this section). The  pollutant gas
 used to prepare calibration gas mixtures
 under paragraph 2.1, Performance Speci-
 fication  2 and for calibration checks un-
 der | 60.13 (d), shall be sulfur dioxide
 (SO,). The span shall be set at 100 ppm.
 For conducting monitoring system per-
 formance  evaluations  under I 60.13(c),
 Reference Method 6 shall be used.
  (4) An instrument for continuously
 monitoring and recording concentra-
 tions of hydrogen sulfide in fuel gases
 j burned  in  any fuel  gas  combustion
 device.     if     compliance    with
 ] §60.104(a)(l) is achieved  by removing
 H,S from the  fuel gas  before  it  is
 burned; fuel  gas  combustion  devices
 having  a  common  source of "fuel gas
 may be monitored  at  one location, if
 1 monitoring at this location accurately
 represents the concentration of H,S in
 i the fuel gas burned. The span of this
 continuous monitoring system shall  be
 300 ppm.
   (5)  An instrument for  continuously
 monitoring and recording  concentra-
 tions of SO,  in the gases  discharged
 into the atmosphere  from any Claus
, sulfur recovery  plant if compliance
 with § 60.104(a)(2) Is achieved through
                                                        11-19

-------
tbe use of an oxidation control system
or a reduction control system followed
by ir.cLientior.. The  span of this con-
tinuous  monitoring  system shall  be
sent at 500 ppm.
  (6) An instrument^) for continuous-
ly monitoring and recording the con-
centration of HaS and  reduced sulfur
compounds  in  the gases   discharged''
into tr><»  atmosphere from  any Claus
sulfur recovery  plant  If  compliance
with § 60.104(aX2) Is achieved through
the  use of a reduction  control system
not  followed  by  incineration. The
..span(s) of this continuous monitoring
system(s) shall be-set  at 20 ppm  for
monitoring and recording the  concen-
tration of H,S and 600 ppm for moni-
toring and recording the concentration
',of reduced sulfur compounds.
   (c)  The  average coke burn-off  rate
 (thousands of Ulogram/hr) and hours of
operation for any fluid  catalytic crack-
Ing  unit catalyst regenerator subject to
 180.102  or  160.103  shall  be  recorded
 daily.
     For any  fluid  catalytic  cracking
 unit catalyst regenerator which Is subject
 to I 60.102 and which  utilizes an inciner-
 ator-waste  heat boiler  to  combust the
 exhaust gases from the catalyst regen-
 erator, the  owner or  operator  shall re-
 cord dally  the rate  of combustion of
 liquid or solid fossil  fuels  (llters/hr or
 kilograms/hr)  and the  hours of opera-
 tion during  which liquid or solid fossil
 fuels are combusted in  the Incinerator-
 waste heat boiler.
   (e) For the purpose of reports under
 I 80.7 (c), periods of excess emissions  that
shall be reported are defined as follows:
   (1)  Opacity.
           All one- hour periods which
 contain two or more  six-minute periods
 during which  the average opacity as
 measured by the continuous monitoring
 system exceeds 30 percent.
  (2) Carbon monoxide. All hourly  pe-
riods during which the  average carbon
monoxide concentration in the gases
discharged into the atmosphere from
any  fluid catalytic cracking unit cata-
lyst  regenerator subject to § 80.103  ex-
ceeds 0.050 percent by volume.
  (3) Sulfur dioxide, (i) Any  three-
hour period  during which the average
concentration of H»S in any fuel  gas
combusted in any fuel gas combustion
device subject to §60.104(a)Q) exceeds
230 mg/dscm (0.10 gr/dscf). if  compli-
ance is achieved by removing H,S from
the fuel gas before it  is burned; or any
three-hour  period during  which  the
average concentration  of SO,  In the
gases discharged into the atmosphere
from any fuel gas combustion device
subject to  §60.104(a)(l) exceeds  the
level specified in § 60.104(a)(l).  if com-
pliance is achieved by  removing SO,
from the combusted fuel gases.
  (11) Any twelve-hour  period  during
which the  average concentration  of
SO,  in the  gases  discharged into the
atmosphere from any Claus sulfur  re-
covery plant subject  to §60.104(a)<2).
exceeds  250  ppm at   zero  percent
oxygen on a dry basis if  compliance
with 560.104(b)  is achieved through
the use of an oxidation  control system
or a reduction control system followed
by  incineration;  or any  twelve-hour
period during which the average con-
centration  of H.S,  or reduced sulfur
compounds  in the  gases  discharged
into  the  atmosphere of  any  Claus
sulfur plant subject  to  §60.104(a)(2)
(b) exceeds 10 ppm or 300 ppm. respec-
tively, at zero percent oxygen and on a
dry basis  if compliance  is  achieved
through the use of a reduction control
system not followed by incineration.
                 11-20
References:

  60.2
  60.7
  60.8
  60.11
  60.13
  Reference  Methods 6,
  Specifications  1. 2

-------
«**part H  Standard* of Pwfomuum lor
        Primary Copper Smelters
160.160  Applicability  mxt  •r»irn«tion
    ef affected facility.
   (»> The provisions of tnls subpart arc
•Pllcable to the following affected facili-
ties in primary copper  smelters: dryer,
Toaster, melting  furnace, **"* copper
converter.
     "Smelting"   means   processing
 techniques  for  the melting  of a copper
suifide ore concentrate or calcine charge
 leading to the formation of separate lay-
ers of molten slag, molten copper, and/or
copper matte.
   (f) "Smelting  furnace"  means  any
 vessel in  which the smelting of copper
sulflde  ore concentrates or  calcines  is
 performed and In which the heat neces-
sary for smelting Is provided by an  elec-
 tric current, rapid  oxidation  of a portion
of the  sulfur  contained  in  the concen-
 trate as it passes  through an oxidizing
atmosphere, or the combustion of a fossil
fuel.                          •
   (g)  "Copper converter^  means  any
vessel to which copper matte is charged
and oxidized to copper.
   (h)  "Sulfurlc acid plant" means any
facility producing  sulfuric acid by the
contact process.
   d)  "Fossil fuel" means natural  gas,
petroleum,  coal, and any form of solid.
liquid, or gaseous fuel derived from such
materials for  the  purpose  of  creating
useful heat.
   (j)  "Reverberatory smelting furnace"
means any  vessel In which the smelting
of copper sulflde ore concentrates or cal-
cines is performed and in which the heat
necessary for  smelting is provided  pri-
marily by combustion of a fossil fuel.
   (k)  "Total smelter charge" means the
weight (dry  basis) of all copper sulflde
ore concentrates processed at a primary
copper smelter,  plus the weight of  all
other solid materials introduced Into the
roasters and smelting furnaces at a pri-
mary copper smelter, except calcine, over
a one-month period.
   (1) "High  level of volatile impurities"
means a total smelter charge containing
more than 0.2 weight percent arsenic, 0.1
weight percent antimony, 4.5 weight per-
cent lead or 5.5  weight percent zinc, on
a dry basis.
 f 60.163  Standard for wlfur dioxide.
   (a) On and  after the date on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted by { 60.8 is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to  the  provisions
 of this subpart shall cause  to  be  dis-
 charged into the atmosphere  from  any
 roaster, smelting furnace, or copper con-
 verter any gases which contain sulfur
 dioxide in excess of 0.065 percent by
 volume, except as provided  in para-
 graphs (b) and (c) of this section.
   (b) Reverberatory smelting furnaces
 shall be exempted from paragraph (a)
 of-this section  during periods when the
 total smelter charge at the primary cop-
 per  smelter contains a high  level of
 volatile Impurities.
   (c) A change in the fuel  combusted
 In a reverberatory smelting furnace shall
 not be considered a modification under
 this part.
 (60.164  Standard for ruible rmiMinn*.
   (a) On  and after the date on which
 the performance test required to  be con-
 ducted by ! 60.8 is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cause to be discharged
 into the atmosphere from any dryer  any
 visible emissions which  exhibit  greater
 than 20 percent opacity.
   (b) On  and after the date on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted by  i 60.8 is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cause to be discharged
 into  the atmosphere from any affected
 facility that uses a sulfuric acid plant to
 comply with the standard  set forth in
 I 60.163, any visible emissions which ex-
 hibit greater than 20 percent opacity.
 8 60.165   Monitoring of operation*.
   (a) The owner or operator of any pri-
 mary copper smelter subject to i 60.163
 (b) shall keep a monthly record of  the
 total smelter charge and  the weight per-
 cent  (dry  basis) of arsenic, antimony.
 lead and zinc contained  in  this charge.
 The analytical methods  and procedures
 employed to determine the weight of  the
 total  smelter charge  and  the  weight
 percent of arsenic, antimony, lead and
 zinc shall be approved by the Adminis-
 trator and shall be accurate  to  within
 plus or minus  ten percent.
  (b) The  owner or operator of any pri-
 mary copper smelter subject to the pro-
visions of this subpart shall in«ta.ft
operate:           11-21
  (1) A  continuous monitoring system
to monitor  and record  the  opacity  of
gases discharged into the  atmosphere
from any dryer. The span of this system
shall be set at 80 to 100 percent opacity.
  (2) A  continuous monitoring system
to monitor  and  record  sulfur  dioxide
emissions discharged Into the  atmos-
phere from any roaster, smelting furnace
or copper converter subject  to 5 60.163
(a).  The span of  this system shall be
set at a  sulfur dioxide concentration of
0.20 percent by volume.
  (i) The continuous monitoring system
performance  evaluation required under
I 60.13 (c) shall be completed prior to the
initial performance test  required under
I 60.8. During the  performance evalua-
tion, the span of  the continuous moni-
toring system may be set at a  sulfur
dioxide concentration of 0.15  percent by
volume if necessary to maintain the sys-
tem  output between 20 percent  and 90
percent  of full scale. Upon completion
of the  continuous monitoring  system
performance evaluation, the span of the
continuous monitoring system  shall be
set at a  sulfur dioxide concentration  of
0 JO  percent by volume.
  (11) For the purpose of the continuous
monitoring system performance evalua-
tion  required  under I 60.13(c) the ref-
erence method referred  to  under the
Field Test for Accuracy  (Relative) in
Performance Specification 2 of Appendix
B to this part shall be Reference Method
6. For the performance evaluation, eacn
concentration measurement shall be of
one  hour duration.  The  pollutant gas
used to prepare the calibration gas mix-
tures required under paragraph 2.1, Per-
formance Specification 2  of Appendix B,
and  for  calibration checks under } 60.13
(d),  shall be sulfur dioxide.
  (c) Six-hour average  sulfur  dioxide
concentrations shall be calculated  and
recorded dally for the four consecutive 6-
hour periods of each operating day. Each
six-hour average shall be determined as
the arithmetic mean of the appropriate
six contiguous one-hour  average sulfur
dioxide  concentrations provided by the
continuous monitoring system installed
under paragraph  (b) of this  section.
  (d) For the purpose of reports required
under 5 60.7(c). periods of excess emis-
sions that shall be reported are  defined
as follows:
  (1) Opacity. Any six-minute  period
during which the  average  opacity, as
measured by the continuous monitoring
system Installed under paragraph (b)  of
this section, exceeds the standard under
|60.164(a).
  (2) Sulfur dioxide. All six-hour periods
during which the  average emissions of
sulfur dioxide, as measured by the con-
tinuous   monitoring  system  installed
under f  60.163, exceed the level of the
standard. The Administrator will  not
consider emissions In excess of the level
of the standard for less than or equal to
1.5 percent of the six-hour periods dur-
ing the quarter as Indicative of a poten-
tial  violation of i 60.11  provided the
affected  facility, including air pollution
control   equipment, is maintained  and
operated in a manner consistent with

-------
good air pollution control practice for
minimizing emissions during these pe-
riods. Emissions in excess of the level of
the standard during periods of startup.
shutdown, and malfunction are not to be
Included within  the  1.5 percent*
(Sees. 111. 114. and 301 (a) of tbe Clean Air
Act as amended (42 U.S.C. 1SS7C-6, 18S7C-B,
l«S7g(a)).)
                                                                             References:

                                                                                60.2
                                                                                60.7
                                                                                60.8
                                                                                60.11
                                                                                60.13
                                                                                Reference  Methods 6,
                                                                                Specifications  1, 2
                                                        11-22

-------
 SubpertQ—Standard* of Performance for
         Primary Zinc Smarter*
160.170  Applicability  and Alienation
    •f affected facility.
   (a) The provision* of this subpart are
 applicable to the following affected facili-
 ties ID primary tine smelters: roaater and
 •Interior machine.
 .   Any facility  under paragraph (a)
 of this lection that commences construc-
 tion  or modification after October 18,
 1074. is subject to the requirements of
 this subpart.
 i 60.171   Definition*.
  As used In this subpart, all terms not
 defined herein shall  have the meaning
 given them In the Act and In Bubpart A
 of this part.
  (a) "Primary zinc smelter" means any
 Installation engaged in the production, or
 any intermediate process in the produc-
 tion, of zinc or zinc oxide from **"" sul-
 flde ore  concentrates through  the use
 of pyrometallurgical  techniques.
  (b)  "Roaster" means any facility In
 which a  zinc sulflde  ore  concentrate
 charge is heated in the presence of au-
 to eliminate a significant portion (more
 than 10 percent)  of the sulfur contained
 in the charge.
  (c)  "Sintering  machine"  means any
 furnace in which calcines are heated in
 the  presence of air to agglomerate the
 calcines into a hard  porous  mass called
 "sinter."
  (d)  "Sulfuric acid plant" means any
 facility producing  sulfurie acid  by the
 contact process.
 | 60.173   Standard for folfnr dioxide.
   (a)  On  and after  the  date  on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted by  { 60.8 is completed,  no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cause to be discharged
 into the atmosphere from any roaster
 any gases which contain sulfur dioxide In
 excess of 0.065 percent by volume.
   (b)   Any  sintering  machine  which
 eliminates  more than 10  percent of the
 sulfur  initially contained  in  the zinc
 sulflde  ore concentrates will be consid-
 ered as a  roaster under paragraph (a)
 of this  section.
 | 60.174  Standard for visible emiuion*.
   (a) On and after the date on which the
 performance test required to  be con-
 ducted  by  I 60.8 is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cause to be discharged
 into the atmosphere from any sintering
 machine any visible emissions which ex-
 hibit greater than 20 percent opacity.
   (b) On and  after the date on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted  by  f 60.8 Is completed, no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions of
 this subpart shall cause to be discharged
into the atmosphere from any affected
facility that uses a sulfuric acid plant to
comply with the standard set forth  in
i 60.173, any visible emissions which ex-
hibit greater than 20 percent opacity.

| 60.175  Monitoring of operation*.
  (2) Sulfur dioxide. Any two-hour pe-
riod, as described in paragraph (b) of
this  section,  during which the average
emissions of sulfur dioxide, as measured
by the continuous monitoring system In-
stalled under paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion, exceeds the standard under { 60.173.
  (a) The owner or operator of any pri-
mary zinc smelter subject to the provi-
sions of this  subpart  shall Install and
operate:
  (1) A continuous monitoring system to
monitor and record the opacity of gases        *     *
discharged Into the atmosphere from any
sintering machine. The span of this sys-
tem shall.be  set at 80 to  100  percent
opacity.
  (2) A continuous monitoring system to
monitor and record sulfur dioxide emis-
sions discharged Into the  atmosphere
from any roaster subject to I 60.173. The
span of this  system shall  be  set at a
sulfur dioxide concentration of 0.20 per-
cent by volume.
  (1) The continuous monitoring system
performance evaluation required under
I 60.13(c)  shall be completed prior to the
initial performance test required under
I 60.8. During the performance evalua-
tion, the span of the continuous monitor-
ing system may be set at a sulfur dioxide
concentration of 0.15 percent by volume
if necessary to maintain the system out-
put  between 20  percent and 90  percent
of full scale. Upon completion of the con-
tinuous monitoring system performance
evaluation,  the  span of the continuous
monitoring system shall be set at a sulfur
dioxide concentration of 0.20 percent by
volume.
  (11) For the purpose  of the continuous
monitoring system performance evalua-
tion required  under I 60.13(c), the ref-
erence  method  referred to under the
Field Test for  Accuracy  (Relative) in
Performance Specification 2 of Appendix
3 to this part shall be Reference Method
6. For the performance evaluation, each
concentration  measurement shall be of
one  hour duration.  The pollutant gas
used to prepare  the calibration gas mix-
tures required under paragraph 2.1, Per-
formance  Specification 2 of Appendix B.
and for calibration checks under I 60.13
(d). shall be sulfur dioxide.
  (b) Two-hour average sulfur dioxide
concentrations shall be calculated  and
recorded dally for the twelve consecutive
2-hour  periods  of each operating day.
Each two-hour  average shall be deter-
mined as the arithmetic mean of the ap-
propriate two contiguous one-hour aver-
age  sulfur dioxide concentrations pro-
vided by the continuous monitoring sys-
tem  Installed  under paragraph (a) of
this  section.                             	
  
-------
Subpart R—Standards of ParformanM tar
         Primary Lead Smelten
160.180  Applicability
     •f affected
    <«) The provislona of this fobpart are
  applicable to  the  following  affected
  facilities In primary lead amelters: sin-
  tering machine, wintering machine dis-
  charge  end. blast furnace, dross rever-
  beratory furnace, electric imelting fur-
  nace, and converter.
    (b) Any facility under paragraph (a)
  of this section that commences  con-
  struction  or modification  after October
  16, 1914. ia subject  to the requirements
  of this cubpart.
 160.1*1   Definition..
   As used in this subpart, all terms not
 denned herein shall have the meaning
 given them In the Act and In Subpart A
 of this part.
   (a) "Primary lead smelter" means any
 Installation or any intermediate process
 engaged in the production of lead from
 lead sulflde ore  concentrates  through
 the use of pyrometallurglcal techniques.
   (b) "Sintering machine"  means any
 furnace In which a  lead sulflde  ore con-
 centrate charge Is heated in the  presence
 of air to  eliminate sulfur contained  in
 the  charge and  to agglomerate  the
 charge into a hard porous mass called
 "sinter."
   (c) "Sinter bed" means the lead sulflde
 ore concentrate charge within a atnter-
'  "Sintering machine discharge end"
 means any apparatus which receives sin*
 ter as it Is discharged from the conveying
 grate of a sintering machine.
   (e) "Blast furnace" means  any reduc-
 tion furnace to which sinter is charged
 and which forms  separate layers  of
 molten slag and lead bullion.
   (f)  "Dross  reverberatory furnace"
 means any furnace  used for the removal
 or  refining of  Impurities   from  lead
 bullion.
   (g) "Electric smelting furnace" means
 any furnace in which the heat necessary
 for smelting of the lead sulflde  ore con-
 centrate  charge is generated by passing
 an electric current through a portion of
 the molten mass in the furnace.
   (h) "Converter"  means any  vessel to
 which  lead concentrate  or  bullion  la
 charged and refined.
   (i) "Sulfuric acid plant" means any
 facility producing sulfuric acid by the
 contact process.
 | 60.183  Sundard for tolfor dioxide.
   (a) On and after the date  on which
 the performance test required to be con-
 ducted by I 60.8 Is completed,  no owner
 or operator subject to the provisions  of
 this subpart shall cause  to be discharged
 into the atmosphere from any sintering
 machine,  electric  smelting  furnace,  or
converter gasea which contain sulfur di-
oxide  in excess of  0.065  percent by
volume.
| 60.184  Standard for riaible emiiaiona.
   (a)  On and after the date on which
the performance test required to be con-
ducted by {60.8 is completed, no owner
or operator subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause to be discharged
into the  atmosphere from any blast fur-
nace,  dross  reverberatory  furnace,  or
aintering machine  discharge end any
visible emissions which  exhibit greater
than 20 percent opacity.
   (b)  On and after the date on which
the performance test required to be con-
ducted by { 60.8 is completed, no owner
or operator subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause to be discharged
Into the atmosphere from any affected
facility that uses a sulfuric acid plant to
comply with the standard set forth in
f 60.183,   any visible  emissions  which
exhibit greater than 20 percent opacity.
| 60.185  Monitoring, of operation*.
   (a)  The owner or  operator  of any
primary  lead smelter subject to the pro-
visions of this subpart shall Install and
operate:
   (1)  A  continuous monitoring system
to monitor and record  the opacity  of
gases  discharged Into  the atmosphere
from  any blast furnace,  dross  rever-
beratory furnace, or sintering machine
discharge end. The span of this system
•hall be set at 80 to 100 percent opacity.
   (2)  A  continuous monitoring system
to monitor and record sulfur  dioxide
emissions discharged  into  the  atmos-
phere  from  any  sintering  machine,
electric furnace or  converter subject to
} 60.183.  The  span  of this system shall
be set  at a sulfur dioxide concentration
of 0.20 percent by volume.
   (1)  The continuous monitoring system
performance evaluation  required under
f 60.13 (c) shall be completed prior to the
Initial  performance test  required under
I 60.8.  During the performance  evalua-
tion, the span of the continuous moni-
toring  system may  be  set  at a sulfur
dioxide concentration of 0.15 percent by
volume If necessary to maintain the sys-
tem  output between 20 percent and 90
percent of full scale. Upon  completion
of the continuous  monitoring  system
performance evaluation, the span of the
continuous monitoring system shall be
set at  a  sulfur dioxide concentration of
0.20 percent by volume.
  (li>  For the purpose of the continuous
monitoring system performance  evalua-
tion required under { 60.13 (c), the refer-
ence method referred to under the Field
Test for  Accuracy  (Relative)  in Per-
formance Specification 2 of Appendix B
to this part shall be Reference Method
6. For  the performance evaluation, each
concentration  measurement shall  be of
one hour duration.  The pollutant  gasea
used to prepare the calibration gas mix-
tures required under paragraph 2.1, Per-
formance Specification 2 of Appendix B,
and for calibration checks under I 60.13
(d). shall be sulfur dioxide.
   (b)  Two-hour average sulfur dioxide
 concentrations «h»"  be calculated and
 recorded  daily for the twelve consecu*
 ttve two-hour periods of each operating
 day. Each two-hour average shall be de-
 termined as the arithmetic mean of the
 appropriate  two  contiguous one-hour
 average sulfur dioxide concentrations
 provided  by  the continuous  monitoring
 system installed under paragraph (a)  of
 this section.
   (c)  For the purpose of reports  re-
 quired under i 60.7(c). periods of excen
 emissions that shall be reported are de-
 nned as follows:
   (1)  Opacity.  Any  six-minute  period
 during which  the average opacity, as
 measured by the continuous monitoring
 system installed under paragraph (a) of
 this section, exceeds the standard under
 |60.184(a).
   (2) Sulfur dioxide.  Any two-hour pe-
 riod, as described in  paragraph (b) of
 this section,  during which the average
 emissions of sulfur dioxide, as measured
 by the continuous monitoring system in-
 stalled under paragraph (a) of this sec-
 tion, exceeds the standard under I 60.183.
<8«c  114 of tn» OMB Air Act a*
(43 OJ.C. l«5To-«).).
 References:

   60.2
   60.7
   60.8
   60.11
   60.13
   Reference  Methods  6,
   Specifications  1,  2
                                                          11-24

-------
Sutopart Z—Standards of Performance- for
     Ferroalloy Production Faculties
§60.260  Applicability  tad firllgnfl"rn
     of affected facility.
   <»)  The provision* of this subpart are
 •ppBcatole to the following  affected fa-
 culties: electric submerged arc furnaces
 which produce silicon metal, f orrosilicon,
 eaJclum silicon, tUlcomcnguneae slroon-
 ium.   ferrocbrome   silicon,   allvery
 Iron, high-carton  ferrochrome, charge
 chrome, standard ferromanganese, sfll-
 eomanganeae, ferromancaneee silicon, or
 calcium  carbide;  and  dust-handling
 equipment.
   (to)  Any facility under paragraph (a)
 of this section that commences construc-
 tion or modification after  October  21,
 1074,  Is subject to the requirements of
 this subpart.
 160.261   Definition*.

  As used in this subpart. all terms not
 defined herein *ha.n  have the tti«mi¥ig
 given them in the Act and in Subpart A
 of this part.
   (a) "Electric submerged arc furnace"
 means  any furnace  wherein  electrical
 energy  Is  converted  to heat energy by
 transmission of  current  between  elec-
 trodes partially submerged in the furnace
 charge.
   (b) "Furnace charge" means any ma-
 terial introduced into the electric sub-
 merged arc furnace and may consist of.
 but Is not limited  to. ores, slag, carbo-
 naceous material,  and limestone.
   (c)  "Product change"  means  any
 change in the composition of the furnace
 charge that would cause the electric sub-
 merged  arc furnace  to become  subject
 to  a different mass standard applicable
 under t"'-« subpart
    "Silicon metal" means any silicon
alloy containing more  *>»*" 96 percent
silicon by weight.
   (y)  "Ferromanganese silicon" means
that alloy containing 63  to 66 percent by
weight manganese,  28 to 32 percent by
weight silicon, and  a maximum of 0.08
percent by weight carbon.
g 60.262   SUncUrd  for particulate mat-
    ter.
  (a)  On and after the date on which the
performance  test required to be con-
ducted by i 60.8 is completed, no  owner
or operator subject  to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause to be discharged
 Into the atmosphere from any electric
 submerged arc furnace any gases which:
      *****

   (3) Exit from a control device and ex-
 hibit 15 percent opacity or greater.
  (b) On and after the date on which
the performance test required to be con-
ducted by i 60.8 is completed, no owner
or operator subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause to be discharged
into the atmosphere from any dust-han-
dling equipment any gases which exhibit
10 percent opacity or greater.
§ 60.264  EnuMion monitoring.
  (a) The owner or operator subject to
the provisions of this subpart shall  In-
stall,  calibrate, maintain and operate a
continuous monitoring system for meas-
urement of the opacity of emissions dis-
charged into the atmosphere from the
control devlce(s).
  (b)  For the purpose  of reports re-
quired under i 60.7Cc), the owner or op-
erator shall report as excess emissions
all six-minute periods In which the av-
erage  opacity is 15 percent or greater.
g 60.263  Monitoring of operation*.
   (b)  The owner or operator subject to
 the provisions of this subpart  shall in-
 stall, calibrate, maintain, and operate a
 device to measure and continuously re-
 cord the furnace power input. The fur-
 nace power input may be measured at the
 output or input side of the transformer.
 The device must have an accuracy of ±5
 percent over its operating range.
   (c)  The owner or operator subject to
 the provisions of this subpart  shall in-
 stall, calibrate, and maintain a monitor-
 ing device that continuously measures
 and records  the  volumetric flow  rate
 through each separately  ducted hood of
 the capture system, except as  provided
 under paragraph (e) of this section. The
 owner or operator of an electric  sub-
 merged arc furnace that Is equipped with
 a water cooled cover which is  designed
 to contain  and prevent  escape  of  the
 generated gas and particulate  matter
 shall monitor only the volumetric  flow
 rate through the capture system for con-
 trol of emissions from the tapping sta-
 tion. The owner or operator may install
 the monitoring device (s)  in any  appro-
 priate location in the exhaust duct such
 that reproducible  flow rate monitoring
 will result. The flow rate  monitoring de-
 vice must have an accuracy of ±10 per-
 cent over its normal operating range and
 must  be calibrated  according to  the
 manufacturer's  instructions. The  Ad-
 ministrator may require  the owner  or
                                                        11-25

-------
operator to demonstrate the accuracy of
the monitoring device relative to Meth-
ods 1 and 2 of Appendix A to this part
  
-------
  Subpart AA—Standards of torformanc*
   for Stael Plants: Etoctric Are Furnaces
160.270  Applicability tmi
     •f affected f •ditty.
   (a)  The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to tfae foUowlng affected fa-
cilities In steel plants: electric arc fur-
naces  and dust-handling equipment.
   (b)  Any facility under paragraph (»)
of this section that commences construc-
tion or  modification after October 21.
1974,  is  subject to the requirements of
160-271  Definition*.
  As used in this subpart, all terms not
denned herein shall have the meaning
given them in the Act and In Subpart A
of this part.
   (a) "Electric  arc  furnace"  (EAF)
means any furnace that produces molten
steel and beats  the charge  materials
with electric arcs from carbon electrodes.
Furnaces from which the molten steel la
cast into the shape of finished products.
such as hi a foundry, are not affected fa-
cilities included within the scope of this
definition. Furnaces which,  as the  pri-
mary source of iron, continuously feed
prereduced ore pellets are not affected
facilities  within  the  scope  of   this
definition.
   (b) "Dust-handling equipment" means
any equipment used to handle particu-
late matter collected by the control de-
vice  and located at or near the  control
device for an EAF subject to  this sub-
part.
   (c)  "Control device" means the air
pollution control equipment used to re-
move particulate matter  generated by
an EAP(s)  from the effluent gas stream.
   (d)  "Capture  system"   means  the
equipment  (including ducts, hoods,  fans,
dampers, etc.)  used to capture or trans-
port  particulate matter generated by an
EAF to the air pollution  control device.
   (e)  "Charge" means the  addition of
Iron  and steel scrap or other  materials
into  the top of an electric arc furnace.
   (f) "Charging period" means the time
period commencing at the moment an
EAF  starts to open and ending either
three minutes  after the  EAF roof is
returned  to its  closed position  or six
minutes after commencement  of open-
ing of the roof, whichever Is longer.
   (g)  "Tap"  means the  pouring  of
molten steel from an EAF.
   (h) "Tapping period" means the  time
period commencing at  the moment an
EAF  begins to tilt to pour and ending
either three minutes after an  EAF re-
turns to  an  upright position or  six
minutes after commencing to tilt, which-
ever is longer.
I 60.272  Standard for a*rtieul«le nut-
     ter.
   (a) On and  after the date on which
the performance test required to be con-
ducted  by i 60.8 Is completed, no owner
or operator subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause to be discharged
into the atmosphere from an electric arc
furnace any gases which:
   (2) Exit from a control device and ex-
hibit three percent opacity or greater.
   (3) Exit from a shop  and, due solely
to  operations  of  any EAF(s), exhibit
greater than zero percent  shop opacity
except:
   (1) Shop opacity greater than zero per-
cent, but less than 20 percent, may occur
during charging periods.
   (11)  Shop  opacity greater than  zero
percent,  but  less than 40 percent,  may
occur during tapping periods.
   (ill) Opacity standards  under para-
graph (a) (3) of this section shall apply
only during periods when flow rates and
pressures are  being established  under
i 60.274 (c)  and (f).
   (iv) Where the capture system is op-
erated such that the roof of the shop is
closed during the charge and  the  tap,
and emissions to the atmosphere are pre-
vented until  the roof is opened  after
completion of the charge or tap, the shop
opacity standards under  paragraph (a)
(3) of this section shall apply when the
roof is opened and shall continue to ap-
ply for the length of time denned by the
charging and/or tapping periods.
   (b) On and after the date on which the
performance  test  required  to  be con-
ducted by I 60.8 is completed, no owner
or operator subject to the  provisions of
this subpart shall cause to be discharged
into the atmosphere from dust-handling
equipment any  gases which exhibit 10
percent opacity or greater.
8 60.273   Emiuion monitoring.
   (a) A  continuous monitoring system
for the measurement of the opacity of
emissions discharged Into the atmosphere
from the  control device(s) shall be in-
stalled, calibrated, maintained, and op-
erated by the owner or operator subject
to the provisions of this subpart.
  (b) For the purpose of reports under
I 60.7 (c), periods of excess emissions that
shall be reported are denned as all six-
minute periods during which the aver-
age opacity is three percent or greater.
(8*c. 114 of Uu d«*a Air Aev M
(41 0.8.C. lMlc-9).).
                                       References:

                                         60.2
                                         60.7
                                         60.8
                                         60.11
                                         60.13
                                                         11-27

-------
 Svbport BA—Standards of farfofnMne* for
           Kraft Pulp Millt
60.280  Applicability and designation of af-
   fected facility.
  (a)  The provisions of this  subpart
are applicable to the following affect-
ed facilities In kraft pulp mills: digest-
er system, brown stock washer system,
multiple-effect   evaporator   system,
black liquor  oxidation  system, recov-
ery  furnace,  smelt  dissolving  tank,
Ume  fcHn, and  condensate  stripper
system.  In  pulp mma where  kraft
pulping is combined with neutral sul-
fite  semlchemical pulping, the provi-
sions of this subpart  are applicable
when  any portion  of the  material
charged to an affected facility is pro-
duced by the kraft pulping operation.
  (b) Any faculty under paragraph (a)
of this section  that commences con-
struction or   modification after  Sep-
tember 24, 1976, is subject to the re-
quirements of this subpart.

§ 60.281 Definitions.
  As used in this subpart, all terms not
defined  herein  shall have the same
meaning given them in the Act and in
Subpart A.
  (a) "Kraft pulp mill" means any sta-
tionary source  which  produces  pulp
from  wood   by cooking  (digesting)
wood  chips  in  a water  solution of
sodium hydroxide and  sodium sulfide
'(white  liquor)  at  high temperature
and   pressure.  Regeneration  of  the
cooking chemicals through a recovery
process is also considered part of the
kraft pulp mill.
  (b)  "Neutral  sulfite semlchemical
pulping  operation"  means any oper-
ation in which pulp is produced from
wood  by cooking  (digesting)  wood
chips in a solution  of  sodium sulfite
and  sodium bicarbonate,  followed by
mechanical defibrating (grinding).
  (c)  "Total   reduced sulfur  (TRS)"
means the sum of the sulfur com-
pounds hydrogen sulfide, methyl mer-
captan, dimethyl sulfide, and dimethyl
disulfide, that are released during the
kraft pulping  operation and measured
by Reference Method 16.
  (d)  "Digester  system" means each
continuous digester or each batch di-
gester used for the cooking of wood in
white  liquor,  and  associated  flash
tank(s). below tank(s), chip steamer(s),
and condenser(s).
  (e)  "Brown stock  washer system"
means brown  stock washers and associ-
ated knotters, vacuum pumps, and fil-
trate tanks used to wash the pulp fol-
lowing the digester system.
  (f)    "Multiple-effect    evaporator
system"  means  the  multiple-effect
evaporators      and       associated
condensers)  and  hotwell(s)  used to
concentrate the spent cooking liquid
that is separated from the pulp (black
liquor).
  (g) "Black liquor oxidation system"
means the vessels used to oxidize, with
air or oxygen, the black liquor, and as-
sociated storage tank(s).
  (h) "Recovery furnace" means either
a straight kraft recovery furnace or a
cross recovery  furnace,  and  includes
the  direct-contact  evaporator for a
direct-contact furnace.
  (1) "Straight kraft recovery furnace"
means  a  furnace used to  recover
chemicals  consisting   primarily  of
sodium  and  sulfur  compounds  by
burning black liquor which on a quar-
terly basis contains 7 weight percent
or less of the  total pulp solids  from
the neutral sulfite semichemical pro-
cess or has green liquor sulf idlty of 28
percent or less.
  (j) "Cross recovery furnace" means a
furnace used to recover chemicals con-
sisting primarily of sodium and sulfur
compounds by  burning black liquor
which on  a  quarterly basis  contains
more than 7 weight percent of the
total pulp solids from the neutral sul-
fite  semlchemical process and has a
green liquor sulfidity of more than 28
percent.
  (k) "Black  liquor solids" means the
dry weight of  the  solids  which enter
the  recovery  furnace  in the black
liquor.
  (1) "Green liquor sulfidity" means
the sulfidity of the liquor which leaves
the smelt dissolving tank.
  (m) "Smelt dissolving tank" means a
vessel  used for dissolving the smelt
collected from the recovery furnace.
  (n) "Lime kiln" means a unit used to
calcine lime mud, which  consists pri-
marily  of  calcium carbonate,  into
quicklime, which is calcium oxide.
  (o)  "Condensate stripper  system"
means a column, and associated con-
densers, used  to  strip, with air  or
steam, TRS compounds from conden-
sate streams from various  processes
within a kraft pulp mm.

J 60.282  Standard foiUiarticulate matter.
  (a) On and after the date on which
the performance test required to be
conducted by §60.8 is completed,  no
owner or operator subject to the prov^
sions of this subpart shall cause to be
discharged Into the atmosphere: — — .
  (1) From any recovery  furnace any
gases which:         -            -
  (1)  Contain  participate matter  in
excess of 0.10  g/dscm (0.044 gr/dscf)
corrected to 8 percent oxygen.
  (11)  Exhibit 35  percent opacity or
greater.
  (2) From any smelt dissolving tank
any  gases which  contain paniculate
                11-28
matter  In  excess  of 0.1 g/kg  black
liquor  solids (dry weight)[0.2  Ib/ton
black liquor solids (dry weight)].
  (3) From any lime kiln any gases
which  contain particulate matter in
excess of:
  (i) 0.15 g/dscm  (0.06*7 gr/dscf) cor-
rected to 10 percent oxygen, when gas-
eous fossil fuel is burned.
  (11)  0.30  g/dscm (0^13 gr/dscf) cor-
rected to  10 percent  oxygen,  when
liquid fossil fuel is burned.

$60.283  Standard for total reduced sulfur
    (TBS).
  (a) On and after the  date on which
the performance test required  to  be
conducted  by §60.8  is  completed,  no
owner  or operator subject to the provi-
sions of this subpart shall cause to be
discharged into the atmosphere:
  (1) From any digester system, brown
stock washer system,  multiple-effect
evaporator system, black liquor oxida-
tion system,  or condensate stripper
system any gases  which contain TRS
in excess 
-------
S 60.284  MoaUarinc of emiwioiu and op-
   eration*.
  (a) Any owner or operator subject to
the provisions of this subpart shall In-
stall,  calibrate, maintain,  and operate
the following continuous  monitoring
systems:
  (DA continuous monitoring system
to monitor and  record the opacity of
the gases discharged into the atmos-
phere from any  recovery furnace. The
span  of this system  shall be set at 70
percent opacity.
  (2)  Continuous monitoring systems
to monitor and  record the concentra-
tion of TRS emissions on a dry basis
and the percent of oxygen by volume
on a  dry basis in the gases discharged
into  the atmosphere from any  lime
kJln,    recovery   furnace,  digester
system,  brown  stock washer system.
multiple-effect   evaporator   system,
black liquor oxidation system, or con-
densate stripper system, except where
the provisions of § 60.283(a)(l) (lii) or
(iv) apply. These systems shall be  lo-
cated  downstream  of  the  control
device(s) and the span(s) of these con-
tinuous monitoring system(s) shall be
set:
  (i)  At a TRS concentration of  30
ppm for the TRS continuous monitor-
ing system, except that for any cross
recovery furnace the span shall be set
at 50 ppm.
  (11) At 20  percent oxygen  for  the
continuous oxygen monitoring system.
  (b) Any owner or operator subject to
the provisions of this subpart shall in-
stall, calibrate,  maintain, and operate
the  following continuous monitoring
devices:
  (DA monitoring device which mea-
sures the combustion temperature at
the point of incineration of effluent
gases which are emitted from any  di-
gester  system,  brown  stock washer
system,   multiple-effect   evaporator
system, black liquor oxidation system,
or condensate stripper  system where
the   provisions   of   §60.283(aXD(iii)
apply. The monitoring device is to be
certified by the manufacturer to be ac-
curate within ±1 percent of the  tem-
perature being measured.
  (2)  For any lime kiln or smelt dis-
solving tank using a scrubber emission
control device:
  (DA monitoring device  for the con-
tinuous measurement of the pressure
loss  of the gas stream through  the
control  equipment.  The  monitoring
device is to be certified by the manu-
facturer to  be  accurate  to within  a
gage pressure of ±500 pascals (ca. ±2
inches water gage pressure).
  (11)  A monitoring device for the con-
tinuous measurement of the scrubbing
liquid supply pressure to the control
equipment. The monitoring device is
to be certified by the manufacturer to
be  accurate  within ±15  percent  of
design scrubbing liquid supply pres-
sure.  The pressure sensor or tap is to
be located close to the scrubber liquid
discharge  point.  The Administrator
may be consulted for approval of alter-
native locations.
  (c) Any owner or operator subject to
the  provisions of  this subpart shall,
except  where  the   provisions  of
§60.283(a)(l)(lv)    or   § 60.283UX4)
apply.
  (1)  Calculate and record on a dailv
basis 12-hour average  TRS concentra-
tions for the two consecutive periods
of each operating day. Each 12-hour
average shall  be  determined as  the
arithmetic mean of the appropriate 12
contiguous  1-hour  average  total re-
duced sulfur  concentrations provided
by each continuous monitoring system
installed  under paragraph  (a)(2) of
this section.
  (2)  Calculate and record on a daily
basis 12- hour average  oxygen concen-
trations for the two consecutive peri-
ods of each operating day for the re-
covery furnace and lime  kiln.  These
12-hour averages  shall correspond to
the  12-hour average TRS concentra-
tions under  paragraph (cXl)  of  this
section and shall be determined as an
arithmetic mean of the appropriate 12
contiguous 1-hour average oxygen con-
centrations provided by each  continu-
ous monitoring system installed under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
  (3)  Correct all 12-hour average TRS
concentrations to 10 volume percent
oxygen, except that all 12-hour aver-
age TRS concentration from  a recov-
ery furnace  shall  be  corrected  to  8
volume percent  using the following
equation:
where:

CTO=the  concentration   corrected  for
   oxygen.
C»».=the concentration unconnected for
   oxygen.
X=lhe volumetric oxygen concentration In
   percentage to be corrected to (8 percent
   (or recovery furnaces and 10 percent for
   lime kilns,  incinerators, or  other de-
   vices).
y^the measured 12-hour average volumet-
   ric oxygen concentration.

  (d)  For the purpose of reports re-
quired under § 60.7(c), any owner or
operator subject to  the  provisions of
this  subpart shall  report periods of
excess emissions as follows:
  (1) For emissions from any recovery
furnace periods  of  excess  emissions
are:
  (1) All 12-hour averages of TRS con-
centrations above 5 ppm by volume for
straight kraft recovery  furnaces and
above 25 ppm by volume for cross re-
covery furnaces.
  (11)  All  6-minute  average  opacities
that exceed 35 percent.
  (2) For emissions from any lime kiln,
periods of excess emissions are all 12-
hour   average  TRS   concentration
above 8 ppm by volume.
  (3) For emissions from  any digester
system, brown stock washer system,

              11-29
 multiple-effect   evaporator  system,
 black liquor oxidation system, or con-
 densate  stripper  system  periods  of
 excess emissions are:
  (i) All  12-hour average TRS concen-
 trations above 5 ppm by volume  unless
 the provisions of §60.283(a)(l) (i), (ii).
 or (iv) apply; or
  (ii) All periods In excess of 5 minutes
 and their  duration during  which the
 combustion temperature at the  point
 of  incineration is less than  1200° F.
 where      the      provisions     of
 §60.283(a)Q)(il) apply.
  (e) The Administrator will  not con-
 sider periods of  excess emissions  re-
 ported under paragraph (d) of this sec-
 tion to be indicative of a violation of
 J 60.11(d) provided that:
  (1) The percent of the total number
 of  possible  contiguous  periods  of
 excess emissions in a quarter (exclud-
 ing periods of startup, shutdown,  or
 malfunction and periods when the  fa-
 cility is  not operating) during  which
 excess  emissions  occur   does  not
 exceed:
  (i) One percent for TRS emissions
 from recovery furnaces.
  (ii) Six percent for average opacities
 from recovery furnaces.
  (2)  The  Administrator  determines
 that the affected facility, including  air
 pollution control equipment,  is main-
 tained  and  operated  in  a  manner
 which is consistent with good air pol-
 lution control practice for minimizing
 emissions  during periods  of  excess
 emissions.

 § 60.285 Test methods and procedures.
  (a) Reference methods in Appendix
 A  of  this  part, except  as  provided
 under §60.8(b), shall be used  to deter-
 mine compliance  with § 60.282(a)  as
 follows:
  (1) Method 5 for the concentration
 of  particulate matter and the associat-
 ed  moisture content,
  (2) Method 1 for sample and velocity
. traverses,
  (3) When determining  compliance
 with § 60.282(a)(2), Method 2 for veloc-
 ity and volumetric flow rate,  t
  (4) Method 3 for gas  analysis, and
  (5) Method 9 for visible emissions.
  (b) For Method 5, the sampling time
 for each run shall be  at least 60 min-
 utes and the sampling rate  shall be at
 least  0.85  dscm/hr   (0.53  dscf/min)
 except that shorter  sampling  times,
 when necessitated by process  variables
 or  other factors, may  be approved by
 the Administrator. Water  shall  be
 used as the cleanup solvent instead of
 acetone in the sample recovery proce-
 dure outlined in Method 5.
  (c) Method  17  (in-stack filtration)
 may be  used as  an alternate method
 for Method 5 for determining compli-
 ance with  §60.282(a)(l)(i):  Provided,
 That a constant value of 0.009 g/dscm
 (0.004 gr/dscf) is added to  the  results
 of  Method 17 and the stack  tempera-

-------
ture Is no greater than 205* C (ca. 400°
F). Water shall be used as the cleanup
solvent  iiijtead  of  acetone in  the
sample recovery  procedure outlined in
Method 17.
  (d) For the purpose of determining
compliance with J60.283(a) (1), (2),
(3),  (4),  and (5), the following refer-
ence methods shall be used:
  (1) Method 16  for the concentration
of TRS,
  (2) Method 3 for gas analysis, and
  (3) When determining compliance
with §60.283(a)<4), use the results of
Method  2, Method 16. and the  black
liquor solids feed rate in the following
equation to  determine the TRS  emis-
sion rate.

        MaMQjdJ/BJ-S
Where:
E = mass of TRS emitted per unity of black
   liquor solids (g/kg) (Ib/ton)
Cn = average concentration or  hydrogen
   sulfide  (H.S)  during the test  period,
   PPM.
dun = average  concentration  of methyl
   mereaptan  (MeSH)  during  the test
   period. PPM.
COM, = average concentration of dimethyl
   sulfide (DMS» during the  test period,
   PPM.
CBIOJS = average concentration of dimethyl
   dlsulfide (DMDS) during the test period,
   PPM.
Fm = 0.001417 g/m' PPM for metric units
   - 0.08844 lb/ft' PPM for English units
Fwaa = 0.00200 g/m1 PPM for metric units
   = 0.1248 lb/ft• PPM for English units
Faia = 0.002583 g/m* PPM for metric units
    - 0.1612 lb/ft' PPK for English units
FBU» = 0.003917 g/m' PPM for metric units
    = 0.2445 lb/ft' PPM for English units
QM = dry volumetric stack gas flow rate cor-
   rected to standard  conditions,  dscra/hr
   (dscf/hr)
BLS = black liquor solids feed  rate,  kg/hr
   (Ib/hr)
  (4) When  determining  whether   a
furnace  is straight kraft recovery fur-
nace  or a  cross   recovery  furnace,
TAPFI Method T.624 shall be used to
determine sodium  sulfide, sodium hy-
droxide  and sodium  carbonate. These
determinations  shall be  made  three
times daily from the green liquor and
the  daily average values shall be con-
verted to  sodium  oxide  (Na»O) and
substituted into the following  equa-
tion to determine the green  liquor sul-
fidity:
                                         I.J.J  OtMervatlon for Clocstac of Probe.
                                       If reduction* In cample concentration* are
                                       observed durinc a sample run that cannot
                                       be explained by process conditions, the sam-
                                   ex-
   GLS = 100
Where:
GLS = percent green liquor sulfldity
     1 average  concentration  of  No*
   pressed as Na,O (mg/1)         ~~
        average  concentration  of NaOH
   expressed as Na,O 
-------
 Subpart  HH—Standards  of  Perfor-
   mance  for  Lime   Manufacturing
   Plants

 Sec.
 60.340  Applicability and designation of af-
    fected fadlity.
 60.341  Definitions.  -
 60.342  Standard for particvUate matter.
 60.343  Monitoring of emissions and oper-
    ations.
 60.344  Test methods and procedures.
  AOTHORTTT:  S«c. Ill and 301(a) of the
 Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7411.
 7601).  and  additional authority as noted
 below.

 §60.340  Applicability and designation  of
    affected facility.
  (a) The provisions of this  subpart
 are applicable to the following affect-
 ed facilities  used  in the manufacture
 of lime: rotary lime kilns and lime hy-
 drators.
  (b) The provisions of this  subpart
 are not applicable to facilities used  in
 the manufacture of lime at kraft pulp
 mills.
  (c) Any facility under paragraph (a)
 of  this  section that commences con-
 struction or  modification after May 3,
 1977, is subject to the requirements  of
 this part.

 § 60.341  Definitions.'  ~
  As used in  this subpart, all terms not
 defined herein shall have the same
 meaning given them in the Act and  in
 subpart A of this part.
  (a) "Lime  manufacturing plant" in-
 cludes  any  plant  which  produces  a,
 lime product from limestone by calci-
 nation. Hydration of. the lime  product
 is also considered to  be part of the
 source.            : •
  (b) ''Lime product" means the prod-
 uct of  the calcination  process includ-
 ing, but not limited to, calcitic lime,
 dolomitic lime, and  dead-burned dolo-
 mite.        -.'-.,'   .
  (c) "Rotary lime kiln" means a unit
 with an inclined rotating drum which
 is used to produce a lime product from
 limestone by calcination.             i
  (d) "Lime  hydrator" means a unit
 used to produce hydrated lime prod-
 uct.

 { 60.342  Standard for  partieuUtl nutter.
  (a) On and after the  date on which
 the performance test required to  be
 conducted  by §60.8 is  completed.-no
 owner or operator subject to the provi-
•sions of this -subpart shall cause to be
 discharged into the atmosphere:
  (1) Prom any rotary lime kiln any
gases which:
  (i) Contain  participate  matter  In
excess  of 0.15 kilogram per megagram
of limestone feed (0.30 Ib/ton).
  (ii) Exhibit  10  percent  opacity  or
greater.
  (2) From  any  lime  hydrator any
gases which contain participate matter
in excess of 0.075  kilogram per mega-
gram of lime  feed (0.15 Ib/ton).

§ 60.343  Monitoring of emissions  and op-
    erations.
kiln and the mass rate of lime feed to
any affected lime hydrator. The mea-
suring device used must be accurate to
within  ±5 percent of the mass rate
over its operating range.
  (e) For the purpose  of reports re-
quired  under   §60.7(c),   periods  of
excess emissions that shall be reported
are defined as all six-minute periods
during  which the average opacity of
the plume from any lime kiln subject
to paragraph (a) of this subpart is 10
percent or greater.
  (a) The- owner or operator subject to
the provisions of this subpart shall in- <** »« °* "??,a " lunended
stall,  calibrate, maintain, and operate **^ UJ*-C- <414JJ
a   continuous  monitoring  system,
except as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section, to monitor and record the
opacity of  a representative portion of
the gases discharged into the  atmos-
phere from any rotary lime kiln. The
span  of this system  shall be set at 40
percent opacity.
  (b)  The  owner or operator  of  any,
rotary lime mn using a wet scrubbing
emission control device subject to the
provisions of this subpart shall not be
required to monitor  the opacity of the
gases discharged as  required in para-
graph (a) of this section, but shall in-
stall,  calibrate, maintain, and operate
the following continuous monitoring
devices:
  (DA monitoring device for the con-
tinuous measurement of the pressure
loss of the gas stream  through  the
scrubber. The monitoring device must
be accurate within ±250 pascals (one
inch of water).
  (2) A monitoring device for the con-
tinuous measurement of the scrubbing
liquid supply  pressure to  the control
device. The monitoring device must be
accurate within ±5  percent of design
scrubbing liquid supply pressure.
  (c)  The  owner or operator  of  any
lime hydrator using a wet scrubbing
emission control device subject to the
provisions of this subpart shall install,
calibrate, maintain,  and  operate  the
following continuous  monitoring de-
vices: .  - .   .    - *   -   _
  (DA monitoring device for the con-
tinuous  measuring  of the scrubbing
liquid flow   rate.  The  monitoring
device must be accurate within ±5 per-,
cent of  design  scrubbing  liquid flow
rate.            .  •   -^.. .
  (2) A monitoring device for the con-
tinuous measurement of the electric
current, in  amperes,  used by the scrub-
ber. The monitoring  device must be ac-
curate, within  ±10  percent over "its
normal operating range.
  (d) For the purpose'of conducting a
performance   test under  $60.6,  the
owner or operator of any lime manu-
facturing plant  subject  to the provi-
sions of this subpart shall install, cali-
brate, maintain, and operate a device
for measuring the mass  rate of lime-
stone feed  to any affected rotary lime
               11-31

-------
                                  METHOD 1—Baunx AKB  Vrt-ocrrr  T».»Tri<.«Ej  ro*
                                           -x    6TiTION4»T SODECK

                                  1. Princifilt ind ApplicabaUi

                                    1.1 Principle. To aid In the-representative nieasure-
                                 jneot of pollutant emissions tod/or total volumetric flow
                                  rale from a stationary source, > measurement site where
                                  the  effluent stream u  flowing In a known direction la
                                  selected, and the cross-section of tbe stack la divided Into
                                  a number of equal areas. A traverse point it then located
                                  within each of these equal anas.
                                   '1.2 Applicability. This method la applicable to flow-
                                  Inf (as streams In ducts, stacks, and flues. Tbe metfcod
                                  cannot be used when: (1) flow Is cyclonic or swirling  (fee
                                  Section  2.4), (2) a stack i» smaller than about 0.30 meter
                                  <12 In.)  In diameter, or O.O71 m> (113  In-1)  In croea-eec-
                                  tJonal area, or (1) tbe measurement si(e u less tban  two
                                  suck or duet diameter: downstream or less  than a  bait
                                  diameter upstteam from a flow disturbance.
                                    Tbe requirements of Ibis method must be considered
                                  before r.onstnjctf on of a new facility from whicb emissions
                                  will be measured; failure to do so may require subsequent
                                  alterations to Ihe (tack or deviation from the standard
                                  procedure. Cases  involving variants are subject to  ap-
                                  proval  by  tbe  Administrator,  U.S.  Environmental
                                  Protection Agency.

                                  2. Proetiurt

                                   2.1 Selection  of Measurement Site. Sampling  or
                                  velocity measurement  is performed at a site located at
                                  least eight stack: or duct diameters downstream and two
                                  diameters upstream from any flow disturbance sucb as
                                  a bend, eipaosion, or contraction In tbe slack, or tram a
                                  visible flame. If ne<«sary, an alternative location may
                                  b* selected, at a position at least two stack or duet di-
                                  ameters  downstream and a ball diameter oruttream from
                                  any  flow disturbance.  For a rectangular cross section,
                                  an equivalent diameter (£>.) shall be calculated from  tb*
                                  fallowing equation, to determine tie upstream and
                                  downstream distances:                     •   •
                                                  D.'
 where i-lenglh and ""-width.
   2.S  Delernuning the Number of Traverse Points.
   2.2.1  Paniculate. Traverses. When the eight-  and
 two-diameter criterion can be met, tbe minimum number
. of traverse points shall be: (1) twelve, (or circular or
 rectangular stacks with diameters (or*: equivalent di-
 ameters) greater than 0.81 meter  (24  in.); (2) eight, for
 circular stacks  with diameters between 0.80 and 0.61
 meter (13-24 in.); (3) nine, tor rectangular stacks with
 equivalent diameters between 0.30 and 0.61 meter (13-24
 in.).                  .  .        v
   When tbe eight- and two-diameter criterion cannot b*
 met, the minimum number of traverse v°ints Is deter-
 mined from Figure 1-1. Before referring  to tbe figure,
 however, determine the distances from tbechovn meas-
 urement site U> the nearest upstream  and downstream
• disturbances,  and  divide each distance  by the stack
 diameter  or equivalent diameter, to determine tbe
 distance in terms of tbe number of duct diameters. Then,
 determine from Figure  1*1 the minimum number of
 traverse points that corresponds: (1)  to the number of
 duct  diameters  upstream; and (2) to the number of
 diameters  downstream.  Select  tbe bigber  of the  two
 minimum numbers of traverse points, or a greater value,
 ao that for circular stacks tbe number  is a multiple of 4,
 and for rectangular flacks, tbe number Is one of thos*
 sbown In Table 1-L

 TABU 1-1. OoM-wcjioiial Itftut far trcmtolar tfmckj

                                           Are>
                                            Ml
           A'umbrr of trmrrrH potato
9..
12.
16.
20.
25..
                                                                                       ..
                                                                                      42..
                                                                                      49..
                                            4X3
                                            4x4
                                            Sl4
                                            4lS
                                            6x5
                                            tit
                                            lit
                                            7x7
                    Figure 1-1.   Minimum number  of traverse points for particulate traverses.

                     DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM  FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE (DISTANCE A)

                                        1.0                            1.5                            2.0
£   10
2
               * FROM POINT OF ANY TYPE OF
                 DISTURBANCE (BEND,  EXPANSION,  CONTRACTION, ETC.)
                                                                                                        8
                                                                                                      *
                DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCET(DISTANCE B)

                                                                         11-32
                                                                                                                                        10

-------
    50
         DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE (DISTANCE A)


0.5                          1.0                           1.5                           2.0
                                                                                                                                 2.5
                                        I
                                                I
I
 CO
O
a.
LU
u.
O

     30
     20
                                                                                                     DISTURBANCE


                                                                                                    MEASUREMENT
                                                                                                    ?- '  SITE
     10
                                                                                                            DISTURBANCE
                                                                     I
                       3              45              67              8             9

              DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE (DISTANCE R)
                                                                                                                         10
          Figure 1-2.  Minimum number of traverse  points for velocity  (nonparticulate)  traverses.
                                             2.2.2 Velocity  (Non-Partlculate)  Traverses. When
                                            velocity or volumetric Bow nit Is to be determined (but
                                            not particolaU matter), the same procedure as that for
                                            paniculate Inverses (Section 2.2.1) la followed, except
                                            that Figure 1-2 may be osexj instead of Fiirure 1-1.
                                             2.3  Cross-Sectional Layout aod Location of.Travers*
                                            Points.
                                             2.3.1 Circular Stacks. Locate the traverse points on
                                            two perpendicular diameters adcordjng to Table 1-2 and
                                            Uie example shown in  Figure 1-3. Any equation  (for
                                            eiamplcs, see Citation: 2 and 3 in [he Bibliography) that
                                            gives the same values as those in Table I--2 may be used
                                            in lieu of Table 1-2.
                                             For particulate traverse*, one of the diameter* must b«
                                            in a plane containing Uie greatest eipccled concentration
                                            variation, e.g., after brnds, one diameter shall be in the
                                            pl&ne of the bend. This requirement becomes less critical
                                            as the distance from the disturbance increases; therefore.
                                            other diameter locations may be used, subji-ct la approval
                                            of the Administrator.
                                             jn addition, for stacks having diorDcters greater than
                                            O.G1 ID (24 in.) no traverse points ihall be located within
                                            2-5 ecuUmo.lers (1.00 tn.) of the stack vails; and for stack
                                            diamcUTS equal to or less than 0.81 m (24 In.), no traverse
                                            points shall be located wit hin 1.3 cm (O.iO in.) of the slack
                                            walls.  To meet these criteria',  observe the procedures
                                            given below.
                                             2.3.1.1  Slacks With Diameters Greater Than 0.41 m
                                            (34 In.), When any of the traverse points as located  In
                                            eVctlon 2.3.1 toll within 2.5 cm (1.00 In.) of the slack walla,
                                            relocate them away from tha stack walls to: (1) a distance
                                            of 2J em (1.00 In.); or (2) a distance equal to the aoiile
                                            Inside  diameter, whichever is  larger. These relocated
                                            (nvers* points (on each end of a diameter) (hall be to*
                                            "adjusted" traverse polnu.
                                             Whenever two successive traverse points are combined
                                            to form a  single >d|usl«d traverse point, treat the ad-
                                           justed  point as two separate traverse points, both In tb«
                                           campling (or velocity  nivasurcment) procedure, and  In
                                           recording the dala.
                                                          11-33

-------
    TRAVERSE
       POINT

         1
         2
         3
         4
         t
                   Figure 1-3. Example showing circular stack cross section divided into
                    12 equal areas, with location of traverse points indicated.
                                                                                                          filln rta/l< having U-rcntiftl InlUj nr °U"-' d"ct ron-
                                                                                                          flrureUom  »nirh t/Td  lo  induce  ivi viliiig:  In Ui«'s»
                                                                                                          Iiutwints. the pre.vvice or anwnfr of ryclunl<- flow at
                                                                                                          the tamnliTit loration mufl bedcU'rmii"-d  The following
                                                                                                          techniques arc acceptable (or Ibis determination.
1 1
° i °, >
T - '"
!'J i
i —
i
0 | 0 1
1 1
1
0 1 0
1
-1
o '1 o
1
1
— 1 	
1
o e
1
1
                                                       Figure 1-4. Example snowing rectangular stack crott
                                                       lection divided into 12 equal areas, with • traverse
                                                       point at cemroid of each area.
     Table 1-2  LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN CIRCULAR  STACKS

              (Percent of stack diameter from inside wall  to traverse point)
Tr» verse
point
number
on ( .
diameter
1
2
3
4|
5'
6
7
8
9
10
11
12J
13
14
15
16
J7
18
19
20:
21
22
23
24
• Number of traverse points on i diameter
2
14.6
85.4











i







'
.
4
6.7
25.0
75.0
•93.3












'






6
4.4
14.6
29.6
70.4
85.4
95.6
•
















8
3.2
10. S
19.4
32.3
67.7
80.6
89.5
96.8










'
.

y

10
2.6
8.2
14.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
77.4
85.4
91.8
97.4










•


12
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
2S.O
35.6
64.4
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9











14
1.8
5.7
9.9
14.6
20.1
26.9
36.6
63.4
73.1
79.9
85.4
90.1
94.3
98.2









16
1.6
4.9
8.5
12.5
16.9
Z2.0
28.3
37.5
62.5
71.7
78.0
83 .'1
87.5
91.5
95'. 1
98.4








18
1.4
4.4
7.5
10.9
14.6
18.8
23.6
29.6
38.2
61.8
70.4
76.4
31.2
85.4
89.1
92.5
95.6
98.6






20
K3
3.9
•6.7
. 9.7
12.9
16.5
20.4
25.0
30.6
38.8
61. '2
69.4
75.0
79.6
83.5
87.1
90.3
93.3
96.1
98.7




22
1.1
3.5
6.0
8.7
11.6
14.6
18.0
21.8
26.2
31.5
39.3
60.7
68.5
73.8
78.2
82.0
85.4
88.4
91.3
94.0
96.5
98.9



24
1.1
3.2
' 5.5
7.9
10.5
13.2
16.1
19.4
23.0
27.2
32.3
39.8 '
60.2
67.7
72.8 '
77.0
80.6
83.9
86.8
89.5
92.1
94.5
96.8
98.9
  JJ.1-3  Blacks With Diamrten Equal to or Loss Tb«n
0.61 m O4 In.), follow the procedure In Section 2J.1.1.
noting  only that any  "adjusted" polnu should be
relocated away from the flack walls to: (1) • distance at
1J em  (OJO In. 1: or  C) a dtslance equal to Ibe DouJ*
Inside diameter, whichever li larger.
  1JJ   Rectangular   Slacks  Determine tbe  number
of lnv«ne points as uplalned In Sections 2.1 and JJ of
Uui mttbod. From T»ble 1-1. drtrrmliM UM (rid too-
flfuraUon. DMd« the »tvi crtm-tefllon Into u many
•qua! r«ctjuiful&r fclenieouU areas u trtrene poLota,
»nd Item local* a invent point at the rtntiold of each
•quaj are* anwdJnc to tbe eutnple In Fi(urt 1-4-
  Tbc lituaUoo of trm»erM pomu beliuj too clow lo  tb«
nx'k  wall!  b not upect«d  to  arur »dth rcctanciilai-
•Ucia. If thh problam ihoold e»cr arise, the Adimnls-
tntlor must  b«  contacted for ruolatlbn of UM oiati«r.
  2.4  Varioration ol Ab^nct ol Cyclonic flow. In most
fUtlonarr aourraa, Ibr direction of rtack  cu Scnr H
MSontiallir  ptraJlel   to   the  >tack  valb.   UowtTer,
erdonic flo<» may eilA 0) a/t*r nich  dt»M-« u ryrlonea
aod inertlal  deml5t«n following venturi acnjbbexa, or
                                                        L«T«] and iero the mnnoin^ter. Connect a Type  8
                                                      pilot tub< to the manometer. Position th« Type 8 pilot
                                                      tube at each inverse point, lo cuecession,  ao  thai ih*
                                                      planes of the fac* openiru;? of tbe pilot tube are perpendio-
                                                      ulo.- to tbe itack eross-wctionaj plane: when the Type 8
                                                      pilot robe b In this position, it I: at "0° reference." Note
                                                      the differtmiaJ  pressure (Ap) reading at each traverse
                                                      point.  If  a nuH (tero)  pilot  readjng  is obtained at 0*
                                                      reference  ai a riven trarcrse  poini. an acceptable flo»
                                                      eondJiioD ciiiuai that point. If tbe pilot reading 1> not
                                                      xaro at 0* reference, rotate the pilot lube (DP lo ±fXT yaw
                                                      an* ]«). on til a null nsdjne is obtained. Carefully detemtine
                                                      tod record lb«  value of the  roiation  angle (o) u> Ibe
                                                      nearest decree. After tbe null technique has been applied
                                                      at each irmrrse point, calculate tbe averare of the  abso-
                                                      lute values of «-. assign a values of 0° to those poinu for
                                                      vnich no roiauoo «K required, and include Ibese In tbe
                                                      overall  average.  If Ihe average value of a is greater than
                                                      10°. the overall flov condition in tbe slack Is unacceptable
                                                      ana alternative methodology, sul>iu:i to Ihe approval of
                                                      tbe Administrator, mart be usod to perform  aecuraU
                                                      aample and velocity traverses.
   1. Determining Dust Concentration In a Gu Stream.
 ASME.  Performance Test Code No. 27. New  York.
 U57.
   2. Devorklu,  Howard, et  aL All  Pollution Source
 Testing  Manual Air Pollution Control  District.  Loi
 Angeles, CA. November  1963
   a. Methods  fcr Oelermlnatlon  of Velocity, Volume,
 Dust and Misi Content of Oases. Western Precipitation
 Division of Joy ManuIacturiDg Co. Los Angeles, CA,
 Bulletin VtT^iO. 1968.
   4. Standard Method for SampUng Slacks for Paniculate
 Waller. In: 1971 Book of ASTM Standards, Pin 23.
 ASTM Designation D-2928-71. Philadelphia. Pa. 1971.
   i. Hanwri, 11. A., el al. Paniculate Sampling Strategies
 for Large Power Planis  Inchjding Nonuniform Flow.
 USEPA, ORD. ESRL,  Research Triangle Park, N.C.
 EPA-600/2-76-170. June 1978.
   6. Eniropy EnrironnjentaUsu. Inc.  Deierminatlon of
 the Oplimum  Number of Sampling Poinls: An Analysis
 of Method 1  Criteria. Environmental Proleclion Agency.
 Re««arch Trianfle Park, N.C. EPA Conlracl  No. 48-01-
 »ir2, Task 7.

 MITHOB J— DtTSiinniTioN  OT STIC« OAS VILOOTT
  AJTD VOLCMITUC FtOW RiTI (TTPI S PlTOT TUB!)

 1. Principlr end AppltmbUUl

   U  Principle. Tbe average gas velocity  In a stack Is
 determined  from the gas density and from measurement
 of Ihe average velocity head wiih a Type S (Siausscheibe
 or reverse tyr*i pilot tube.
   U  Applicability. Thl.i  method  Is applicable  lor
 me-asurcmem of the average velocity of a gas stream and
 for quantifying gas now.
  This procedure is  not applicable at measure-merit sites
 which fail to meet Ihe criteria of Method I, Section 2.1.
 Also, the method cannot be used for direct measurement
 In cyclonic or swirling gas streams; Section 2.4  of Method
 1 shows how 10 determine cyclonic or swirling flow con-
 ditions.  Wben nnacceptable conditions eusl, alternative
 procedures, sub)ect to the approval of the Administrator,
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, must be em-
 ployed  to  make accurate flow  rale determinations:
 examples of sucb alternative procedures are: (1) to install
 ftraigntening vanes: (2) lo calculate the tolal rolumelrlo
 now rate noichiomelrically, or (3) lo  move to another
 measurement die al which the Dow Is acceptable.
Z. Apparatut
                                                                              11-34-

-------
1.90.2.54cm'
(0.75-1.0 in.)
         i
                                     T~Vl'-'.'.'fr"TJ
               ...... ^^'..
    =    T    •'Ht'.'fA.V.W.f.T., *ur


    ^    T    ,  7.62 cm (3 in.}'
                                          TEMPERATURE SENSOR
                                                                                       LEAK-FREE
                                                                                      CONNECTIONS
                 •SUGGESTED (INTERFERENCE FREE)
                  PITOT TUBE • THERMOCOUPLE SPACING
                                 Figure 2-1.  Type S pitot tube manometer assembly.
                                         2.1  Type 8 Pilot Tub*. Th« Typ« 8 pilot tub*
                                        (Figure 2-1) thai] be made of m«Ul tubing (e.g., niin-
                                        I«3 tteel). It ii recommended that the titenul tubing
                                        ,, Figure 2-2b) b« betwtco 0.48
                                        and. 0.96 ceatlmoten (ffi tad H Ineli). There sb&ll  b«
                                        An equal distaoce from the b&se o/ each leg of th« pilot
                                        labe to III lace-opening place (dimension] Pi and Pi,
                                        Figure 2-2b); jt la recommended that thli disLaoce  b*
                                        b«twe«n 1.05 and IJOtimei the Bitenul tubiox diameter.
                                      .  The (act op«aJng3 of tne pilot tutx iball, pn/erably.  b«
                                        aligned u sbown lo Figure 2*2; however, slight rolsahgn-
                                        menu of the opening! are permissible (M< Figure 2-3).
                                         Tn« Type 8 pitot tube thai] bare a ioow-o coefflclent,
                                        d«t«rtalned as outlined In Section <. An IdentlAcailon
                                        number snail be ai^goed to the pitot tube; this number
                                        •hall be permanently marked or engrarril ou the body
                                        of tne lube.
                                                        11-35

-------
    TRANSVERSE
     TUBE AXIS
              \
                         FACE
                       'OPENING
                        PLANES

                           (a)
                         A SIDE PLANE
I • "• " V /
LONGITUDINAL '* Dt
TUBE AXIS ^ *

A _X
B "\

PA
PB
: *"Y^
B-SIDE PLANE
                                                   NOTE:

                                                   1.05Dt
-------
        TRANSVERSE-
         TUBE AXIS  '
                               I      w      I
LONGITUDINAL
  TUBE AXIS—
                                                                       J, ft t+or-)
                                                                   —M » ^ 	!• •
           Figure 2-3. Types of face-opening misalignment that can result from field use or im-
           proper construction of Type S pilot tubes.  These will not affect the baseline value
           of.Cpfs) so long as ai and 0.2 < 10°, /?1 and 02 < 5°. 2 < 0.32 cm (1/8 in.) and w <
           0.08 cm (1/32 in.) (citation 11 in Section 6).
                                       11-37-

-------
   A standard pilot tul-e iv.aT I* n"-d Instead of a Type. P,
 prnvid'-O thai 11 me«-l3 II"" n»Tificallniis of Sections J.7
 »nd  <.2: nnte, Imwrvrr.  thfti  II"  smile and Impact
 lirrssiirc holes of jimidurd pilot tube* arc susceptible to
 pliituinir tn  p.-uticul3tf-ladrn eas streams. Therefore,
 whenever « standard plu>l lube  i.' n"d to perform >
 traverse, aderiu-.te  prwi  must be  fnrni.«licd  that  the
 nricninrs of the pilot mix- have not plurci-d up during the
 traverse twrji^j;  this ean be done by taking ft velocity
 •wad (Ap) reading at the final Iraverv point, eleaiiing out
 tlie Impart  and natic boles of the standard pitnt tube by
 "bark-purling"  with  pressurized  air.  and thfn taking
 another Ap mdjng. If the Ap readme? mad' before and
 •fter the air poire are the same (tS percent), the Invent
 Is acceptable. Otherwise, reject the run. Note that If Ap
 at Uio final traverse point Is unsuitably low, another
 point may  be selected. II "back-purging"  at regular
 Inlrrrali If port  of the procedure, then comparative Ap
 readings (halHM taken, as above, tor th« last two bade
 purfe* at which suitably bigh Ap readings are observed-
   S.I  Differential Prewure Gauce. An Inclined manom-
 «ler or equivalent device is used.  Most sampling trains
 are equipped  with a 10-in.  (water column)  Inclined'
 vertical manometer, having 0.01-ln. HrO divisions OD the
•0- to 1-ln. Inclined scale, and 0.1-ln. HiO divisions on tb«
 1-  to 10-ln.  vertical Kale.  This type of manometer (or
 other gauge of equivalent  sensltlTlty) Is satisfactory for
 the measurement of Ap values as low as 1J mm (0.05 In.)
 HrO. However,  a dinerential pressure gauge of greater
 (ensjllvtiy thai) b« used (subjecl to  the approval of the
 Administrator).  If any of  toe following Is (bond to be
 tine: (1) the arithmetic avenge of all Ap readings at toe
 traverse points In the slack Is leas than 1.3 mm  (0 OS to.)
 HiO; (2) for traverses of 12 or more points, more than 10
 percanl of the individual Ap readings are below 1J nun
 (0.05 In.) HiO: (3) lor traverses of fewer than 12 points,
 more than one Ap reading Is below 1J mm (0.06 In.) HiO.
 Citation IX In Section « describes commercially available
 EnstrumentalloQ  far tbe measurement of low-range gas
 velocities.
   As an alternative to criteria  (1) through (3) above, UM
 (ollowini calculatioa mav be prrformed to determine Uw
          of using a more  sensitive differentia) presaur*
  rxiitiirf cnnjc nwd not 1*- al!»rli"(5 tn fhi> pit"', tnl^;
  this  aJl^riiauve is subject  w  the approve]  of  Uia
  AdniuJ^'raiur.
   t.t  I'T^'urr rrol-»»nd Or.u;f. A pic7omr:i-r lul>« and
  rncri-ur\- or »uier-;ijlwj l'-iuim inamtnu-ifr ca|«»t.-lr of
  mriiurinr jLarlt prc^urp to within 2.6 mm (0.1 in.) lie
  is u«*d. The italic top of a suiidnrd  type pilot tube or
  one li'C of a Type  X pilot lulie with'the farr O|x-tiin|t
  plants positioned  paralU-J  lo  llif giis flow may also  Ue
  U-vd a« the pressure probe.
   2.i  Barometer. A mercury, ttncroM, or other barom-
  eter  capable of measuring   atmospheric  pressure  to
  wlthlo 2J mm UK (0.1 In. HE) may  be  used. In many
  eases, the  barometric reading may lx obtained from a
  nearby national weather wrvlrc station. In which  case
  UM  nation  value  (which  Is  tbe  absolute barometric
  pressure)  (hall  be requested and an  adjustment  for
  elevation  differences between the weather station  and
  the sampling point shall be applied at a rate of mlnua
  2.5 """ (0.1 In.) H( per SOmeler (100  foot) elevation
  Increase, or vice-verso for elevation decrease.
   2.9  Gas Density Determination Equipment. Method
  3 equipment, if needed (see Section 3.6), to determine^
  tbe  (lack  gas  Ary molecular weight,  and Reference
  Method 4 or Method S equipment  lor moisture content
  determination;  other methods may be used subject to
  approval of tbe Administrator.
   2.7 Calibration Pilot Tube. When calibration of the
  Type E pilot tube Is necessary  (sea Section 4), a standard
  pilot tube I* used  as  a reference. Tbe standard pilot
  tut* shall, preferably, have a known coefficient, obtained
  either (1) dlrrctly from the National  Bureau of Stand-
  ards, Route 270, Quince Orchard Road,  Qaitbersburt.
  Mn-jlrvnd. or (2"i l»y i..'.n»rr.!lnn nr Ji.rt anoHm* Ftlnil.in]
  pilot tube  with »!]  NHS-tijceu'-li.  owlliiiciit. Allcr.
  nnttvi-ly.  a  yla-ujmU pltul  tuU- o Citations 7. 8, and IT in
  R'Ttion C) rn.ny W U-. cl. IMUit tuU-> (l<-«ipliod  lUTyldnip
  to these s|«•v.-ifR-aiiou will have baseline coi-U.iient.< of
  about O.W'irO.Ol.
    2.7.1  Hemispherical (sliowu In Ficure2-4).elliiJ6nhlal,
  or conical Up.
    2.72  A rainlaiurn ot s\i rllamelrrs straichl nin (liawd
  ui«n D. tbe external 4ii^rnetcr of the tul>e) between Ilia
  tip and tbe (title pressure boles.
    2.7.3  A minimum of eight diameters rtralght  run
  between UxrituUc preisuro hole* anil the cenlerUnc of
  the external tube, follcwinc tlie 90 drcrec bend.
    2.7.4  Static prmurr holes olrrjual tlte (approilronlely
  0.1 D), equally spaced in a piezometer ring conftcurctlorL
    2-7.5   Ninety  degree  bend, with curved  or mluurd
  Junction.
    2.8  Differential Pressure  Gouge  for Type  S Pilot
  Tube Calibration. An inclined manometer or equivalent
  Is used. If the tingle-velocity calibration technique U
  employed  (sec Section 4.1.2.3), the calibration dlacren-
  tlal pressure range (liall be readable to the nearest 0.13
  nun HrO (O.OOS in. liiO). For mulUvelocity callbraOons,
  tbe gauge shall be readable to the nearest 0.13 mm HiO
  (0.005 In BiO) for Ap values between 1.3 and 25 mm IIlO
  (0.05 and 1.0 In.  BtO), and to the Dearest U mm HiO
  (0.05 In. HiO)  for Ap values  above 25 mm HrO (1.0 tn.
  HjO). A speciaJ, more grnsltlve  raoce will be  required
 to read Ap njnee below 1.3 """ HrO |0.05 lo. HrO]
  (ae« Citation 18 in Section 8).
 vhera:
   Api-Indlvid.ua! velocity bead reading at a travena
        point, mm H,O (in. H.O).
     n-Total nnmbor of traverse points.
    i."-0.13 nun  IIiO  when metric units are nsed and
        0.005 in HiO when English units are used.

 If T  Is greater  than  1.05, the velorlty head data an
 unacceptable and a more sensitive differential pressure
 gauge must be U5ed.
   NOTT..—If differential  pressure gauges other than
 Inclined manometers are used  (e.g., macnehelic gauges),
 their calibration  must be checked after each lesi series.
 To check Hie calibration  of a differential pressure gauge,
 compare Ap readings of the taupe with those of a gauge-
 on manometer at a minimum of three points, approxi-
 mately representing the ranee  of Ap values In the slack.
 If, at each point, the values of Ap as read by the differen-
 tial  pressure gauge and  gauge-oil manometer agree  lo
 wilhin 5 percent, Ihe differential pressure gauge shall be
 considered to be in projier calibration. Otherwise, the
 test series shall either b? voided, or procedures lo adjust
 the  measured Ap values and linal rrsullj shall be used,
 subject to the approval of the Administrator.
   2^  Temperature  Gauge. A  thermocouple, Uquid-
 fUled bulb thermometer, bimcuillic  thermometer, mer-
 cury-in-glass thermometer, or  other gaucc  eanable  of
 measuring lempcraiure to within 1.5 prrci-ni of the mini-
 mum  absolute slack  trin|irralurr Rliall  he  used. The
 temperature gauge shall  Ix1 attached to the  pilot lube
 such that the sensor tip dors not touch any  mcial; the
 cause  shall be in  an Inlerfcreiite-fr.-e arrangement with
 resiM£t lo Ihc pilot lube face  openings (see  Kigure 2~1
 and  abo Figure 2-7 in Section 4). Alicruatr positions may
 b« used If the  pilot -tube-temperature gauge system  la
 calibrated according to the procedure of Section 4. Pro-
 vided that a difference  of not more than 1  pcrccni In the
 averaga vclocily measurement u; Introduced, the tea-


                                                                                                                   CURVED OR
                                                                                                              MITEBED JUNCTION
                                                                           STATIC
                                                                            HOLES

                                                                           (-0.1D)
                                                              HEMISPHERICAL
                                                                     TIP
             Figure 2-4.~Standard  pitot tube design specifications.
1. Praadurt

  I.I  Set np the apparatus as shown In Figure 2-1.
Capillary tubing or surge tanks installed between  the
mauometer  and pitot tube mny be used lo dampen Ap
fluctuations. It is recommended, but not required, that
a pretest leak-check be conducted, as follows: (1) blow
through the pilot Impact opening until at least 7.6 cm
(3 in.) HiO velocity presMire registers on the manometer;
then,  close oS  the impact opening. The pressure shall
remain stable for at least 15 seconds; (2) do Ihe same for
the static pressure side, except using suction to obtain
the minimum of 7.6 cm (3 in.) HiO.  Other leak-check
procedures, subject to tbe approval of the Administrator,
may be used.          .                             :
  3.2  Level and tero Ihe manometer. Because the ma
nometer level and zero may drift due to vibrations and
temperature changes, make periodic checks during the
traverse.  Record all ncx-essary data as shown In the
example data sheet O'tcure 2-5).
  3.3  Measure the velocity hend nn<5 lemperalure at the
traverse points specified by Method 1.  Ensure that the
proper differential pressure gutice is  l»eing used for tha
range of Ap values encountered (see Section 2.2). If It Ll
necessary  to clia^e to a more sensuive gouge, do so, and
rcmeasure the Ap and n mperauire readings at each tra-
verse poini. Conduct a post-tost leak-check (mandatory),
as described in Section 3.1 above, lo validale Ihe traverse
run.
  3.4  Measure the static pressure In  tbe tUck. On»
reading Is usually adequate.
  3.5  Determine the atmospheric pressure.
                                                                                  11-38'

-------
PLANT.
DATE.
         RUN NO.
STACK DIAMETER OR DIMENSIONS, m{in.)
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, mm Hg (in. Hg}	
CROSS SECTIONAL AREA,
OPERATORS
PIT.OTTUBEI.D.NO.
  AVG. COEFFICIENT, Cp = .
  LAST DATE CALIBRATED.
                                      SCHEMATIC OF STACK
                                         CROSS SECTION
   Traverse
    PuNo.
mm (inj H20
                                 Stack Temperature
mm Hg (in.Hj)
                                Averag*
                    Figure 2-5. Velocity traverse data.
                               11-39:

-------
  3.1 Dcterrnlnt (he rtark gas dry molivular welpht.
For remt'Uilion pror&uat or pror&ssci ttut unit essen-
tially COi, Oi. CO, and Ni, ose Metbod X For procr.-wa
emlitlnc essentially tlr. in analysis  neud not be con-
duct**d; use a dry  molucular weight of 29.0. For other
processes. other methods. subject to the approval of Un
A dr. I-1-.: .''••. -:•;•">•<• 'i and H In.) wid U ^j and /'i are
 equal and between 1 .<& and l.£D R,, there are two poulble
 options: (1) the, pilot tube maj be ealibratod acrordini;
 to the procedure outlined In  Sections 4 1.2  through
 4.1 J> below, or (2) a baseline  (Isolated tube) coefficient
 nlue at 0.84 mar be assi(ned to the pilot tube. Note,
 bowerer, that U the pilot tube b pan of an assembly,
 calibration may itlll be required,  desplu  knowledge
 of the baseline coefficient ralue (ae* Section 4.1.1).
   If Di, Ft, and Pi are outside the specified limits, the
 pilot tube muit be calibrated as outlined In 4.1-2 through
, 4.1 £ below.
   4.1.1 Type 8 Pilot Tube Assemblies. During umple
 ud relocltT traTenea, tbe Isolated Type 8 pilot tub* to
 Dot alwayi osed: la man; uulaneea, tbe pilot tube I*
 uedlneooiblnauoo with other soorwtampllnf oompoo-
 eots (tbennocouple,  aampllng probe, noitle) as part of
 an "assembly." The presence of other aamplin? compo-
 nents can tometlmei aflecl the baseline ralne of the Type
 S pilot tube coefficient (Citation < In Section «); thrrelor*
 aa assigned (or otherwise known) baseline  coefficient
                                    i-L
        TYPE SPITOT TUBE
 T«lu« oi"T cr my not be rnlld for » rtvon ««-.•.'iibly. Tin
 busline u:id «i.  ^i)>ly corQickot vaiu'i ulU L>c idtiiliuil
 only when Hie riU'.nt placrmrnt ol tlie cul>i|i
-------
                        THERMOCOUPLE
                                     -ti-
                            TYPE S PITOT TUW
        SAMPLE PROBE
                                                                                               THERMOCOUPLE
                                                                                                                                2>S.O«tm  j

                                                                                                                                  Ui«J
f
                                                                                   -&-
                                                                                                      TYPE SPITOT TUBE
    SAMPLE PROBE
                                    Figure 2-7.  Proper thermocouple placement to prevent interference;
                                    Dt between 0.48 and 0.95 cm (3/16 and 3/8 in.).
                                                                             TYPE SPITOT TUBE
                                                    SAMPLE  PROBE
      Y>7.62cm(3inJ
   Figure 2-8.   Minimum pitot-sample probe  separation  needed  to  prevent interference;
   D   between  0.48 and  0.95 cm (3/16  and  3/8  in.).
  4.1.2.1  The flowing gas strum most be manned to a
 duct of definite cross-sectional area, either circular or
 rectangular. For circular cross-sections, tbe minimum
 diirt diameter shall b« 30J cm (12 In.); tor rectangular
 rroaveectiona, the width (shorter tide) shall b« it leut
 25 4 cm (JOIn.).
  4.U.I  Tbe eroo-seftlonal area of tbe ralibration duct
 must be  constant over a distance of 10 or mar* duct
 diameters. For a rectangular crosa-section, use An equlva-
 Irnt diameter, calculated from the following equation,
 to determine the  number o/ duct diameters,:
                 D,-
                       21. IT
where:
  />.-Equivalent diameter
   £-Length
  To ensure th« presence of stable, fully developed flow
patterns at th« calibration site, or "test section." tbe
ou must b« located at le*st eiftlil diameters downstream
and two diameters upstrfam Irom Lh« ocarwt disturb-
       —The debt- and two-diaai«trr criUria arc not
absolute- o(h*r test *eclloo locailons m«r b« o»d (rob-
)Kt to approTal o/ the Administrator), prortded that the
flow at th« i«n i"< >> siable and d«moutnblr p^nlld
to tb« duet uia.
  4J J 3' Th« flow ryylmi  shafl hare tha capacltr t«
(fii«roia a lpst-5«Uon vtlocity around 91} ffl/min 13,000
                 ft/rain). This velocity mart be constant with time U
                 guarantee steady flow  during calibration. Note that
                 Type 8 pitot tube coefficients obtained by single-velocity
                 calibration at 915 m/min (5,000 ft/mln) will generally be
                 valid to within ±3  percent for tbe measurement of
                 velocities above 306 m/min (1,000 ft/min} and to within
                 ±5 to 6 percent for the measurement of velocities be*
                 tween 180 and 3O& m/min (600 aod 1,000 ft/mln). If a
                 more precise  correlation between  C, and velocity b
                 de^irea, the flow system  shall have tbe capacity  to
                 generate at least four distinct, time-invariant test-section
                 velocities covering the velocity range from ISO to 1.525
                 rnAnin (600 to 5,000 ft/mln),  and calibration data shall
                 be taken at regular velocity Intervals over this range
                 (sea Citations 9 and 14 in Section t for details).
                   4.1.2.4  Two entry  ports, one each for the standard
Equation ''-I   and Type 8 pilot tubes, shall be cut In the tast section;
  1              the standard  pitot entry port shall be located slightly
                 downstream of tbe Typa 8 port, 
-------
    PIT'OTTUBE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

    CALIBRATED BYr.	
                       .DATE:.

RUN NO.
1
2
3
"A"SIDE CALIBRATION
' A pad
em HjO
(in. HaO)




APM
em H20
-tin. H20)



Cp(SIDEA)
Cp(s)




•
DEVIATION
cpW ' Cp-Type 8 pilot tube coefficient '
 C, (mi • Standard pilot tube coefficient; DM 0.99 If tb«
        coefficient is unknown and the tut* is designed
          according to tbe criteria of Sections 2.7.1 to
          2.7.5 of this method.
   A J>.u—Velocity head measured by the standard pltot
          tube, cm HiO (uv H|O)
    Ap.-Velodty bead measured by the Type S pltot
          tube, cm H,O (In. HiO)
  4.1.4J  Calculate C, (dde A), the  mean A-side coef-
ficient, and  £, (side B), the mean  B-side coefficient'
calculate the difference  between these  tvo  average
values.
     4.1.4.3  Cat -.iblc llio <1 .\;.ii;n:i ofpschofllit llin-c A-
    (side 1J). l!.«c Hie fo|.
   lowing equation:
                                                                                                                                  CP...! —  0.01
  and 11 thr absolute value of the difference between C,
  CA) and "c, (B) Is 0.01 or Irss.
    4.1.5 Special considerations.
    4.1 Al  SfJrctloo of calibration point.
    4.1.i.l.l  When an  isolnled Type S pilot tube \t cali-
  brated, select a calibration point at or near tbe center of
  the duct, and foUow the prorrdurrs outlined in Sections
  4.1.S and 4.1.4_aboTe- The T)-p« 6 pilot coefficieno n
  obtained, I.e., C, (side A) and C, (sideB), Till be TaJld
  ao long as either:  (1) the isolated pilot tube is used' or
  (2) tbe pltot tube Is used witli other components (noitle,
  thermocouple, sample prolip) In an arrangement thai 5
  free from aerodynamic interference eflecu (see Figures
  2-6 through 2-«).
   4.1J.U  For Type  S pilot tube-thermocouple  com-
  binations (without sample probe), select a calibration
  point at or near the centrr of the duct, and follow the
  procedures outlined In Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 above.
  The coefficients so obtained » III be valid so long as the
  pilot tube-thermocouple combination is used by  Itself
  or withother components In an interference-free arraofp.
  ment (Figures 2-« and 2-*).
   4.1.5.1.3  For assemblies  with  sample  probes,  the
  calibration point should be located at or near the center
  of the duct; however, insoriion of a probe sheath into a
 small duct may cause siguiiicant cross-sectional  area
  blockade and yield incorrect rr*effirient values (Citations
 In Section 6). Therefore, lo minimize Ihe blockage effect,
 the calibration point may In- a few inches off-center If
 necessary. The actual blocknpe effect will be negligible
 when  the  theoretical  blocVacc, as  determined  by a
 projected-arca model of tlie probe sheath, Is  2 percent u
 less of the duct cross-sectiorml area for assemblies without
 external shear hs (Figure 2-lttO, and 3 percent or less for
 assemblies with eiternal shcatus (Figure 2-10b).
  4.U.2  For  tho«e probe assemblies in which  pltot
 tube-nonle Interference is a luctor (i.e., those in which
 the pitoi-notiel separation  distance  fails to meet the
 specification illustrated  in Ficure  2-6«), the  value of
 C.<.) depends  upon the amount of free-space between
 the tube and nozrle, and therefore is a function of noztls
 size. In these  instances. sojvuoLe calibrations shall bo
 performed  wiih each of the commonly osed notzle sites
 in place. Note  that the uncle-velocity ealjbralion  l«b-
 nlque is acceptable  for Uili purpose, even  though th«
 larger noizle'sizes OO.OSScm or \i in.) are not ordinarily
 used for isotinetic  sampbiic  at velocities  around 915
 m/min  (3,000 ft/nun), which is tli« calibration velocity:
 note also that it is not ntvessary to draw an isokmetio
 sample dunnj calibration (see Citation 15 in Section 6).
  4.1. S.3  For a probe  awmlily constructed such that
 Itj pltot tube is always used in the same orientation, only
 one side of  the pilot tube nred be calibrates (the ad«
 vhich will lace  the flow). The pilot tubt must still meet
 Ibe alignment specifications of Ficure J-J or 2-3, however,
 and must have  an average de\ ulion («) value of 0.01 or
less (see Section 4.1.4.4).

-------
                              ESTIMATED
                              SHEATH
                              BLOCKAGE
F   lxw     1
[pUCTAREAj
                                                                                                    x  100
Figure  2-10.   Projected-area  m.odels for typical  pitot  tube  assemblies.
   4.1 J  Field Use and Recalibration.
   4.1.6.1  Field Use.
   4.1.6.1.1  When a Type S pitot tube (Isolated tube or
 assembly) Is used in the field, the appropriate coefficient
 value (whether assigned or obtained by calibration)shall
 be used to perform velocity calculations. For calibrated
 Type 8 pitot tubes, the A side coefficient shall be used
 when the A side of the tube faces the flow, and the B side
 coefficient shall be used when the B side faces the  flow;
 alternatively, the arithmetic average of the A and B side
 coefficient values may be used, Irrespective of which side
 tacce the flow.
   4.1.6.1.2  When a probe  assembly Is used to sample a
 frn.ii  duct (12 to 36 in. in diameter), the probe sheath
 sometimes blocks a  significant part  of the duct cross-
 section,  causing  a reduction in the  elective value ol
 7»(.i- Consult Citation t In Section 6 for details. Con-
 ventional  pilot-sampling  probe   assemblies are   not
 recommended for use In ducts baring inside diameters
 smaller than 12 Inches (Citation 16 in Section 6).
   4.1.6.2  Recalibration.
   4.1.6.2.1  Isolated Pitot Tubes. After each acid use, the
 pitot tube shall be carefully reeiamined In lop, side, and
 «cd views. If the pitot face openings are still aligned
 within the specifications illustrated in Fiji ire 2-2 or 2-3,
 tt can be assumed that the baseline coefficient of the pilot
 tube has not changed. If, however, Ibe tube has been
 damaged lo the estcnl that It no longer meet! the specifi-
 cations of Figure 2-2 or 2-3, the dam act shall either be
 repaired to restore proper alignment of the face openings
 or the  tube shall be discarded.
  4 j g_2_j Pitot Tube Assemblies. After each field  use,
 check the lace opening alignment of the pitot tube, as
 m Section 4.1.6.2.1; also, remeasure the intcrcomponent
 spacing! of tho assembly. If the Intercomponent spaclius
 bave not changed and the face opening  alignment is
 acceptable. It can b« assumed that the coefficient of the
 assembly has not changed.  If the face opening alignment
 is no longer  within the specifications of Figures 2-2 or
j-3 either repair  the damage or replace the pitot tub*
 (calibrating the new assembly, if necessary). If the inter-
•omnonont spacinfs have changed, restore the original
apacings or recalibrate the  assembly.
  4 J  Standard pilot tube (I/ applicable). II a standard
Diiut lube is used for the Telocity traverse the tob« shall
be constructed according to the criteria of Section 2.7 and
thall be or-slgned  a baseline coefficient value of 0.90. If
lh< jtandtrd  nltot tube Is u.*d as  part of an a,vembly.
 the tobe shall be In an Interference-free arrangement
 (subject to the approval of tile Administrator).
   4.3  Temperature  Gauges. Aft«r each field  use, cali-
 brate dial thermometers, liquid-filled  bulb  thermom-
 eters, thermocouple-potentiometer systems, and  other
 gauges at a temperature within 10 percent of the average
 absolute  stock temperature.  For temperatures up to
 405* C (761° F), use an ASTM mercury-in-glass reference
 thermometer, or equivalent, as a reference; alternatively,
 either a  reference  thermocouple  and  potentiometer
 (calibrated by NBS) or thermometric fiied points, e.g..
 Ice bath  and boiling wator (corrected for barometric
 pressure)  may be used. For temperatures above 405* O
 (761* f), use an NBS-calibrated reference tbermocouple-
 polenliomeler system or an alternate reference, subject
 to the approval of the Administrator.
  If. during calibration, the absolute temperatures meas-
 ured  with the gauge being calibrated and the reference
 gauge agree within  1.5 percent, the temperature data
 taken in the  field shall be considered valid. Otherwise,
 the pollutant emission test shall  either bo considered
 invalid or adjustments (If appropriate) of the test results
 shall be made, subject to the approval of the Administra-
 tor.
  4.4   Barometer. Calibrate the barometer used against
 a mercury barometer.

 S. Calnitlima

  Carry out calculations, retaining at least one extra
 decimal figure beyond that of the acquired data. Round
 of! figures after final calculation.
  6.1  Nomenclature.
   A — Cross-sectional area of stack, m' (If).
  B,.-Water vapor In the gas stream (from Method J or
       Reference  Method  4). proportion by  volume.
   C, —Pitot tub* coeffleleni»41menslonle«s.
  K,r Pitot tube constant.

    ,, 0_ ™_ r(g/g-molc)(mm Hg)"]m

        J  EccL   ("KKmmHjO)   J

far the metric  system  and

           _ft_ r(lh/ll)-mole)(in. Ha)"]"*

    "^eccL    (°K)(m.H,0)    J


                    11-43-
                                                                            lor the English system.
                                                                               Af<-Molecular weight of stock gas, dry basis (M
                                                                                  Section 3.6) g/g-mole (IbAb-mole).
                                                                                I/.—Molecular weight of stack fas, wet basis, ifg-
                                                                                  mole Qb/lb-mole).

                                                                                  — A/rf (1—B,,)+18.0 BM           Equation 2-5

                                                                              /"»«.- Barometric pressure at measurement site, """
                                                                                  Hg (in. Hg).
                                                                                Pa—Stack static pressure, rn'Tn Hg (In. Hg).
                                                                                P.*-Absolute Hack gas pressure,  mm Hg (in. Hg)j

                                                                                  "Pi^+P,                      Equation 3-6

                                                                              /*.ij«Standard absolute pressure, 7GO mm Hg (29.93
                                                                                  in. Hg).
                                                                               C^-Drr volumetric stack gas flow rat* corrected to
                                                                                  standard conditions, dscm/br (dscZ/hr).
                                                                                 I,-Stock temperature, *C CF).
                                                                                T,—Absolute stack  temperature, *K (*R).
                                                                                  —J73+(. for metric

                                                                                  -«0+J. for English
                                                               Equation 2-7

                                                               Equation 2-1
                                                                              r«d - Standard sbwlute temperature, »3 *K (S28* R)
                                                                                >,-Averace stock gas velocity, m/see (ft/sec).
                                                                               Ap-Velocity head of stack goa, mm HiO (io. HiO).
                                                                             3,6fJO~Conversion factor, sec/or.
                                                                              18.0-.Molemlar weight  of water,  g^g-mole  (Ib-Tb-
                                                                                  mole).
                                                                             6.2  Average slock gas velocity.
                                                                                                             PM.

                                                                                                 ^          Equation 2-9

                                                                                 Avtrago stock gas dry volumetric flow rate.
                                                                                                            Equation 2-10
                                                                             I. Mark, L. 8. MT-hnnical Encinrcrs' Ilandbook. New
                                                                             orr HcGrjw-Hill Hook Co., Ir.e. 1041.
                                                                             2. Perry. J.  IT. Cliemicnl Enirineers' Tfnndbook. New
                                                                           York. Jlctjraw-lliU Uoiit Co., Inc. 1060.

-------
    3. Flilrrliora, R T.. W T. Todd. and W. S. Smith.
  Signihrnnrr of Errors In Pluck Snmiillns Mi-!i.«umncnls.
  U.S.  Knvironnieninl 1'roier-lion   Afrncy.  Research
  Triansle I'ark, N.C. (Presented at tlic Aimu:il Mi-ollnc o(
  the  Air Pollution Control Association, Si.  Louis, Mo.,
  June 14-1H. l'J70.)
    4  Standard Method  for Sampling Slacks for Paniculate
  Matter. In: 1971  Book of AST.M  Standards, Part  23.
  PhiladeJpliia,  Pa. 1971. ASTM Designation D-2928-71.
    6. Vcniiard,  J. K. Eluiucntury Fluid Mechanics. New
  York. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.  1047.
    6.  Fluid  Meters—Their  Theory  and Application.
  American Society of Mechanical Engineer],  New York,
  N.Y. 1950.
    7. ASH HAS Handbook of Fundamental*.  1072. p. 208.
    8. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Port 26. 1974. p.
  MS.
    ». VoDaro, H. F. Guidelines for  Type S  Pilot Tub*
  Calibration. U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.
  Research Tiangle Park, N.C. (Presented at  1st Annual
  Mt«Ung,  Source  Evaluation Society,  Dayton,  Ohio,
  September 18,1975.)
    10. Volluro,  R. F. A Type S Pilot Tub*  Calibration
  Study. U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency. Emts-
  oon Mcasurejnent Broach,  Research Triangle  Pork,
  N.C. July 1974.
    11. VoUaro,  R. 7.  The Effects  of Irnp*ct  Opening
  Misalignment  on  the  Value of the  Type S  Pilot Tube
  Coefficient.  U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency,
  Emission  Measurement  Branch,  Research  Triangle
  Park, N.C. October 1976.
    12. Vollaro,  R.  F. Establishment of a Baseline Coeffi-
  cient Value for Properly Constructed Type S Pjtot
  Tubes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emis-
  sion Measurement Branch,  Research Triangle Park,
  N.C. November 1974.
    IS. VoUaro^  R. F. An  Evaluation of Single-Velocity
  Calibration Techniques as a Means of Determining Type
,  8 Pilot Tube Coefficients. U.S. Environment*! Protec-
  tion Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, Research
  Triangle Park  N.C. August 1975.
    14. vollaro,  R. F. The  Ose of Type S Pilot Tubes for
  the Measurement of Low Velocities.  U.S. Environmental
  Protection Agency,  Emission Measurement  Branch,
  Research Triangle Park, N.C. November 1974.
    15. Smith, Marvin  L.  Velocity Calibration  ol EPA.
  Type  Source  Sampling  Probe.  United Technologies
  Corporation,   Pratt and  Whitney  Aircraft Division,
  East Hartford  Conn. 1975.
    16. Vollaro, R. F. Recommended Procedure lor Sample
  Traverses In Ducts Smaller than 1? Inches in Diameter.
  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency   Emission
  Measurement  Branch, Research  Triangle Park,  N.C.
  November  1976.
   17. Ower, E.  and R.  C.  Pankhurst. The Measurement
  of AiT Flow, 4th Ed., London, Pcrgamou Press. 19M.
   18. Vollaro, R. T. A survey of Commercially Available
  Instrumentation lor the  Measurement of Low-Range
  Oas Velocities. U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency,
  Emission  Measurement   Branch,  Research Triangle
  Park, N.C. November 1978. (Unpublished Paper)
   19. Onyp, A. W., C. C. Si. Pierre. D.  8.  Smith. D.
  VOLIOD. and J. Sieiner. An Experimental Investigation
  of the Effect of Pilot Tube-Sampling Probe  Configura-
  tions on the Magnitude of the S Type Pilot Tube Cc-
  ftfficienl for Commercially Available Source Sampling
  rrobr«.  rrrpan-d Iiy the VnivrrMi> olttnulor for the
  Ministry o( Hie Environment, To:o:.lo, Caiijdo.  Feb-
  ruary  1975.

  METHOD 3 — GAS ANALYSIS  FOK  CARIIOS  PIOIIKE,
   OXTOEN, ElCEM AIB.AND L>E7 MOLECULAR Wtlfiin

  1. Prineiplr and Appiictbtiiil

   1.1   Principle. A gas sample Is extracted from a stack,
 by  one of Uic following methods:  (1) single-point, grab
 tampling; (2)  single-point, iDlrgntrd  sampling; or (3)
 multi-point. Integrated sampling.  Tlie  nu- sample li
 anaJyu-d for percent  carbon dloiide (COj), percent oxy-
 gen (O7), and, If  necessary, ppreent carbon  monoxldt
 (CO).  If  ft dry molecular weight determination Is to be
 made, either an Orsat or a Fyrite ' anilyier may be nsed
 for the analysis;  for excess air or emission rale correction
 factor determination, an Orsol analyjer must be uwd.
   1.2  Applicability.  This method Is applicable for de-
 termining C0> and  Oi concentration*, eicru air, and
 dry molecular  weight of a sample from  a gas ftrram of a
 Josdl-fueJ combustian process. The method may also b»
 applicable toother processes where it hasl^endfLennlned
 that compounds other than  COi, O:. CO, and  nltmcca
 (Ni) are  not  present  In  concentrations  sufficient to
 alert the results.
   Other methods, as  well as modifications to the proce-
 dure described herein, are also applicable for ?omc or til
 ol the above determinations. Examples of sjwlfic meth-
 ods and modifications include: (1) a multi-[ioint samp-
 ling method using an  Orsat anoJyier  to analvre Indi-
 vidual grab samples obtained ai each point; (2) a melhod
 using COj or Oi and stoichiometric calculations to deter-
 mine dry  molecular weight and excess air; (3) assigning a
 value of 30.0 lor dry  molecular weight.  In lieu of actual
 measurements, for processes burning natural gas, coat, or
 oil. These methods and modifications may be uvd, but
 are subject to the approval of the Administrator.
  As an alternative tp the sampling apparatus and >yt-
 tems described herein, other sampling systems  (e.g.,
 liquid displacement) may be used provided such svsums
 are capable of obtaining  a representative  sample and
 maintaining a constant sampling rate, and are otherwise
 capable  of  yielding  acceptable  results. Use of  such
 vvstems is subject to the approval of the Administrator.
  2.1  Grab Sampling (Figure J-l).
  2.1.1   Probe. The  probe should be made of stainless
 •teeJ or  borosilicale glass tubing and should be equipped
 with an in-stock or oui-siacE niter lo remove paniculate
 matter  (a plug of glass wool is satisfactory for this pur-
 pose). Any other material  Inert to Oi. COi, CO, ana Ni
 and resistant to temperature at sampling conditions may
 be used for the probe; examples of such material are
 aluminum, copper, quant glass and Teflon.
  2.1. J Pump.  A one-way  squeeze bulb, or equivalent,
Is used  lo transport  Ihe  gas  sample  lo the analytor.
  2.2  Integrated Sampling (Figure 1-2).
  2.2.1  Probe. A probe such as Uiat described in Section
2.1.1  is suitable.

  i .Mention of  trade names or specific products docs not
constitute endorsement by the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency.
                                                  11-44

-------
                        .PROBE
                                                FLEXIBLETUBING
             \
                 FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
TO ANALYZER
                                     SQUEEZE BULB
                                  Figure 3-1. Grab-sampling train.
                                                RATE METER
          AIR-COOLED
          CONDENSER
PROBE
    \
    \
       FILTER
     (GLASS WOOL)
                                      RIGID CONTAINER
                          Figure 3-2. IntegratecPgas-sampling train.
                                         11-45

-------
     ; ; 3 Conderner. An air-cooled or water-eooird coo-
   derivr. or olbw condenser that wilt Dot remove Oi.
   CO,. CO, and Ni. may be used to remove- tiers.* moisture
   »-M,-h wnuld Interfere with Ibe operation of Ibe pump
   ana no* nici (less than 4.0 percent) or high Ch greater than
  14.0 percent)  coneentrations,-lbe measuring  burette of
  tbe Orsat must bav« at least 0.1 percent subdivlsions.

  S. Dry Uolmltr ViifU DOtrmimUm

    Any  of the three sampling and analytical procedures
  described below may be used for determining  the  dry
  molecular weight.
    I.I  Single-Point,   Qrab  Sampling  and  Analytical
  Proeedure-
    1.1.1  Tbe sampling point In  the duct ibaD either be
  at tbe centroid of the cross senior or at a point no claw
  to the wails than 1.00m (33 ft), unless otherwise specified
  by the Administrator.-
   1.1-2  Set up tbe equipment as shown In Figure 3-1,
  making cure ail connections ahead of tbe analyzer are
  tight and leak-tree. If an Orsat  analyrer Is used. It fa
  recommended that the analyzer be leaked-cbecked by
  following the procedure In Section £, however, tbe leak-
  dMck U optional.
   1.1 J  pbKe  the probe In th> stack, with the Up of the
  probe positioned at the sampling point; purge the sampl-
  ing one. Draw a sample into the  analyzes and Imme-
  diately  analyze It for  percent COiand percent Oa. Deter-
  mine the percentage of  tbe gas that Is Ni and  CO by
  subtracting the sura  of the percent COi and percent Oi
  from 100 percent. Calculate the dry molecular weight ai
 indicated In Section 6.3.
   a. 1.4  Repeat  the sampling, analysis, and calculation
 procedures, until the  dry molecular weights of any three
 grab samples differ from their me.an by oo more than
 0.3 g/g-mole (0.3 Ib/lb-mole). Average these three molec-
 ular weights,  and  report  tbe  results to  the  nearest
 0.1 g/g-mole Ob/lb-mole).
   1.2  Single-Point, Integrated Sampling and Analytical
 Procedure.
   8.2.1   Tbe sampling poiot In the duct sball be located
 as specified In Section 3.1.1.
   3.2.2  Leak-check  (optional)  the fleiible bog  as In
 Section 2.1-6 Set up tlie equipment as shown  in Figure
 1-2- Just prior to sampling, leak-check  (optional)  tbe
 train by placing a vacuum gauge at tbe condenser inlet,
 polling a vacuum of at least 250 mm  Ilg  (10 in. Bg),
 plugging the outlet at the quick  disconnect, and then
 turning off the pump. Tbe vacuum should remain stable
 for at least 0.5 minute.  Evacuate tbe flexible ba£. Connect
 the probe and pl«e It in the stack, with the tip of  the
 probe positioned at the sampling point; purge the sampl-
 ing line. Nut.  connect the ban and make lure that  ail
 connections art tight and leat tree.
   UJ  Sample at  a  constant rale. Tbe sampling run
 •bould be simultaneous  wilb, and for  the  same total
 length of time as. tbe pollutant emission rate determina-
 tion. Collection of at least 30 liters (1.00 ft') of sample gas
 li rerommended: however,  smaller volumes  may  be
 coUectad.U desired.
  1.2.4  Obtain one Integrated flue gu sample during
 each pollutant  emission  rate determination. Within i
 hours after tbe sample Is uken, analyze It (or percent
 COi and percent  Ot using either an Orsat aruJyLcr or a
 Fyrite-type  combustion gu  analyzer. If an  Orsat ana-
lyzer Is naed. It Is recommended that the Orsat leek-
ececk de&cribed In  Section S be  performed before  this
determination;  bowsver,  UH check Is optional. Deter-
mine the percentage of the gu that Is NI and CO by sub-
tracting  the aum o/ the  percent  CO. and percent  Oi
   from ](X' percent. Calculate the dry molecular weight as
   Indicated In Section «J.
    1.2.5  Repeat the analysis and calculation procedures
   onlU Ibe Individual dry molecular weights for any three
   analyses dlfler from their mean by no more  than 0.3
   tyg-mole (OJ Ib/lb-mole). Average these three molecular
   weights, and report the results la the nearest 0.1 c/g-mole
   (0.1 Ib/lb-mole).
    U Multi-Point, Integrated Sampling and Analytical
   Procedure.
    3-3J  Unless  otherwise  specified by tbe Adminis-
   trator, a minimum of eight traverse points shall be used
   for  circular stackk -baving diameters less  then 0.61 D
   (24 In.), a minimum of nine shall be uivd for rectangular
   stacks having  equivalent diameters less than 0.61 m
   (34 In.), and a minimum of twelve traverse point* shall
   be osed for all other cases. Tbe traverse point* shall b*
   located  according lo  Method 1. The use of fewer point*
   li subject to approval of tbe Administrator.
    X3.2  Follow the procedures outlined in Sections 3.2.2
   through 3.2.1, eicept  for the following: traverse all sam-
  pling points and sample at each point lor an equal length
  of time. Record sampling data  as shown In Figure 3-3.
   4. EnUrioa fiatt Cur,,dim r*ctvi m Ljini Ai, Mn.
      mino/ioB

     NOT*.—A Fyrite-type mmbujiion rw analyio It not
   acceptable lor eiwis air or erui.vsiou rate eornt'tmn luclor
   determination,  unless  approved by the Adntinisirstoi
   If both percent  CO, and poreent  Oi are mcwured  th,
   analnical results ol any of the three prorrdura e'mn
   below nuy also U used (or calculating the dry moloculv
   wriCbt-
     E«h of the three procedures below ihall be used onlr
   when spec lied In an applicable suhnan of Ibe sUndsrdi
   Tb« nse of these procedures for other purnojes must bin
   specific prior approval of  the Administrator.
     4.1  Single-Point,  Qrab  lu^piing Uj Analytical
   Procedure.
     4.1.1  Tbe sampling point In tbe tact shill tlther bi
   at the centroid of the cross-section or at a point no closer •
   to the walls than 1.00m (3.3ft), onlesotherwisespecUlid
   by the Administrator.
     4.1.2 Bet  op tbe equipment as shown In Flran M,
   making sort all connections ahead ol the  analyzer in
   tight and leek-tree.  Leak-cheek  the Oral  analyze: se-
   eording to tbe  procedure described lo Section i. TUi
   leak-check Is mandatory.
TIME




TRAVERSE
PT.
-

f

AVERAGE
Q
1pm





X DEV.8


i


                DEV=
                              Q • Q avg
                                                           (MUSTBE<10%)
                    Figure  3-3.   Sampling rate data.
   4.1.3  Place tbe probe In the stack, with the Up ol tbe
 probe positioned at the sampling point; purge the sam-
 pling line. Draw a sample Into tbe analyzer. For emission
 rate  correction  factor determination, immediately ana-
 lyze  the sample, as outlined In Sections 4.1.4 and 4 1 6
 lor percent CO, or percenl  O,. If eicess air Is  desired'
 proceed as follows: (1) Immedlalely analyie Ibe sample'
 as In Sections 4.1.4 and 4.1J, lor  percent CO,.  0,. and
 CO:  (2) determine the percentage ol the gas tbat is N,
 by subtracting the sua> of the percenl CO,, percent O,
 and  percenl  CO  from 100  percent: and (3) calculate
 percent excess air as outlined In  Section 6 2.
   4.1.4  To ensure  complete absorption of the CO,  Ov
 or U applicable,  CO. make repealed passes throuch each
 absorbing  solution until iwo consocutive readings  are.
 tbe same. Several passes (three or four) should be made
 between  readings.  (If  constant  readings cannot  be
 obtained  aflor tnrce consccutiva  readings  reolace th«
 absorbing solution.)
  4.1.5  After the  analysis  Is  completed,  leak-check
 (mandatory) the Orsat analyser once aealn as described
 In Section 5.  For the results at the  analysis lo be valid
 the Orsil ansryzer must pass this  leak test be/ore and
 after  the analysis. NOTE.—Since this single-point grab
 sampling and analytical procedure Is normally conducted
 In conjunction with a single-point, grab sampling and
 analytical procedure for a pollutant,  only  one analysis
 li ordinarily  conducted. Therefore, real care must be
 taken to obtain  a  valid sample and analysis. Although
 in most cases only CO, or 0, Is required. It U recom-
 mended tbat both  CO, and CT,  be  measured and that
 Citation 5 In the Bibliography be used to validate X.
 analytical data.
  4 J  Single-Point, Integrated Sampling and Analytical
 Procedure.   *
  4.22  Leak-check: (mandatory) the fleilble bat as In
/Section 2.2.6. Set up the equipment u shown UiFirur.
1-2. Jnit pnor to umpung, leak-check (mandslorv) the
train by placing a vacuum gsuce at tbe condenser Inlet,
pulling a vacuum  of at least 150 mm Dg (10 in. Hg)
proving tbe outlet at  tbe  quick disconnect  and then
              '       11-46 •
 tumioj? off the purnp.  The vacuum shall remain stablt
 lor at lca,;i 0.5 minute. Evamale the Bozlble bag. Coo-
 n»ct the prnbeand place It in the stack, with tbe tip of the
 probe portioned  at the sampling point; purge the sam-
 pling line. Neil, connect the bag  and  make sure  that
 all onnni-cuons ore light and leak free.
   4.2.3  Eaznplc at a coiuiont rale, or as specified by th«
 Adminj.'iraior TUe sampling run niust be simuliaoeous
 »nth, and for the  same louil Icngih of time as, the pollut-
 ant  emi-vion  raie  determination. Collect-at least 30
 liters (1.00 ft1) of sample  cas. Smaller volumes may be
 ooUfcied. subject to approval  of the AdminiMjalor.
   4.2.4  Obtain one intrprated flue gas sample  during
 eacb j»ollutani emission rule determination. For emission
 rate corrfrnon factor dctrnninatiOQ, analyze the sample
 within 4 hours oiler it is Inken for percent C0?or percent
 O?  (ai outlined  in  S*,-clion3  4.2.5  throurb  4.2.7).  The
 Orsat ar^Jj-zcr must  be  leak-checked  (see  Section 6)
 before tbe  analysis.  U czcess  air is desired,  proceed as
 follows: (l) wuhin 4 hours after  tbe sample is  taken,
 analyze it las in Sections 4.2.5 through 4.2.7|  lor percent
 COi. O>. and  CO:  (2) determine tbe percentage of the
 gas that is N, by subtracting thr mm of the pcrcenl COh
 percent  O,. and percent CO  from 100 licrcrnl; (3) cal-
 culate ixTLtnl  excess air, as outlined in Section 6.2.
   4.2.5  To ensure complete absorption of the CO,, O».
 or If ap;>Lrab)e. CO. make reiwalrd passe5 Ihroueb eacfl
 absorbing solution until two consecutive readings aro tbe
 same. Several  passes (three or four) should be made be-
 tween readings. (If constant readings cannot be obtained
 alter three  oonsecutlTt readings,  riplace the absorbing
 solution.)
  4.2.6  Keprat tbe analysis until the folio* Ing criteria
 are met:
  4.2.6.1   For  percent COi. repeat the  analytical  pro-
 cedure until the rtjulu ofany three analyse* differ by no
 more than (a) 0.3 percent by volume » ben CO, Is greater
 than 4.0 percent or (b) 0.2 iierccnl by volume  when CO»
Is less thaa or e«ina! to 4.0 percent. A»er»ee the three ao-
ceptable values of percent  CO, and report tbe feral U U>
Ibe Dea-*e£t 0.1  percent.
  4.2.8.2  For percent Oi. repeat the analytical procedon
ontil tbe re?ulls of any lnre« uialyscs difler by no more

-------
 than (a) 0.3 pvrvMit by volume when O, Is Irsa thtn 15 0
 percent or tb) 0.2 prrci-nt by volume when Oi la greater
 than 15.0 prri-rnt. Average the three acceptable values o(
 percent Oi and report tl<« result! to  the  oeartit 0.1
 percent.
  4.2.6.3  For percent CO, repeat the analytical proce-
 dure until the results of tny three icalj*n differ by  no
 man than O.I  percent. Average th« throe acceptable,
 values ol percent CO »nd repurl the results to the nearest
 0.1 percent.
  4.2.7 After  the  analysis Is  completed, leak-check
 (mandatory) Hie Orsat analyzer once wain, as described
 In Section i. For the results of the analysis to be valid, th*
 Onat analyter roust  pas this leak test  before  and  after
 the analysis. Note: Although in most Instances only COi
 •r Oi Is required. It Is recommended that both COi and
 Oi be measured, and that Citation 5 in the Bibliography
 be used to validate the analyllral data.
  4J  Multi-Point, Integrated Sampling and Analytical
 Procedure.
  4.XI Doth the minimum number of sampling points
 and the sampling point location shall be as specified ID
 Section 3.11 o( this met hod. The use of fewer poi nts than
 •pecJied  M jubjcct to Ibe approval of the Administrator.
  4.3.2 Follow  the procedures outlined In Sections 4.2.2
 throurh  4.2.7,  eicepl  lor the  following:  Traverse  ail
 sampling points and  sample at  each point for an equal
 length of time. Record sampling data as sliovrn in Figure
 3-3,

 5. Zrfal-CVct Pttetfart for Oriat Anal^:rrt

  Moving an Orsat analyter frequently causes it to leak.
 Therefore, an Orsat analyzer should be thoroughly Ink-
 checked on site before the Hue «as sample is introduced
 Into it. The procedure for taik-cbecking an Onat aiulyter

  5.1.1 Brine the liquid level In each pip»tte up to the
 reference mark on the capillary tubing and then close the
 pipette stopcock.
  5.1.2 Raise the leveling bulb  sufficiently to bring the-
 eonfining liquid meniscus onto the graduated portion of
 the burette and then  close the manifold sto|».-ock.
  5.1.3 Record the meniscus position.
  5.1.4 Observe the  meniscus in the burette and the
liquid level In the pipette for movement over Uie neit 4
minutes.
  5.1.5 For the Orsat analyter to pass the leak-check,
two conditions most be met.
  5.1.5.1  The liquid level In each pipette must not fall
below the bottom  of the capillary  tuUng during  Ibis
4-mlnuteinterval.
  5.1.5.2  Tbe meniscus In the burette must not change
by more than 0.2 ml during this 4-minutelnterval.
  5.1.0 If the analyter fails the leak-check procedure, all
rubber connections and stopcocks  should be checked
until the cause of the leak is Identified. Leaking stopcocks
must be disassembled, cleaned, and regrfosed. Leaking
rubber connections must be replaced. After the analyter
Is reassembled, the  leak-chock  procedure  must  be
repeated.
(. Calnttaiotu

  a.1  Nomenclature.
     Mi" Dry molecular weight, f.'g-mole (Ib/lb-mole).
   r.EA-Purcflt eicess air.
  %COi-Pereent COi by volume (drr basis).
    "Oi-Percent Oi by volume (dry basis).
      -O-Pereent CO  by volume (dry  bails).
     _Ni-Percent Ni by volume (dry basis).
    0.204- Ratio of Oi to  N, In air, v/v.
    0.280-Molecular weight of Ni or CO, divided by 100.
    0.320-Molecular welsht of Oj divided by 100.
    0.440-Molecular weight of CO, divided by 100.
  6.2  Percent Eiccss  Air. Calculate the percent eic**a
air  (If applicable), by  substituting  the appropriate
values of percent Oi, CO, and Ni (obtained from Svctlon
4.1 J or 4.2.4) Into Equation J-l.
bEA =
                    %0,-0.5%CO
            ).264 %N,( %0,-O.S %CO)
                                                100
                                    Equation 3-1

  NOTE.— The  equation  above  assume that ambient
air is used as the source of Oi and that the fuel does not
contain appreciable amounts of NI (as do coke oven or
blast furnace gases). For tho*e cases  when appreciable
amounts of Ni  are present (coal,  oil, and natural gas
do not contain appreciable amounts of Ni)  or  when
oiygen enrichment Is used, alternate methods, subject
to approval of the Administrator, are required.
  6.1  Dry  Molecular  Weight.  Use  Equation 3-2  to
calculate  the dry  :nolecular weight  of  the  slack  gas
                                    Equation 3-2

  NOTE, — The above equation docs not consider argon
In aJr (about 0.1) percent, molecular weight  of  17.7).
A negative error of about 0.4 percent Is Introduced.
The tester may opt to include argon to the analysis using
procedures subject  to  approval  of  the  Administrator.

7. BWiovTjpA,

  1.  Altshuller. A. P.  Storage of Oases and Vapors in
Plastic  Begs.  International Journal of  Air and Water
Pollution. 6:76-81. 1963.
  2.  Conner, William D. and J. 8. Nader. Air Sampling
Plastic  Bags. Journal of the American  Industrial Hy-
giene Association. W291-J97. 11)64.
  3.  Burrell Manual lor (las Analysts, Seventh edition.
Burrell  Corporation,  2223  Fifth  Aveuue,  Pittsburgh,
Pa. 15219. 1)51.
  4.  Mitchell. W. J. and M. R. Midfctt. Field Reliability
of the Orsat Analyter. Journal of Air Pollution Control
Association W:4'JI-4'J5. May 1976.
  5.  Shigehora, R. T., R. M. Neulichl, and W. S. Smith.
Validating Orsat Analysis Data from Fossil Fuel-Fired
Units. Stack Sampling Newt. 4(2)21-26. August, 1976.
 MITOOD t—DtTtJmrNATiov or Moi*tu»t  CONTENT
                   m STICI GASU

 L  Principal and Xpp'inoftfr

   1.1  Principle. A gas sample Is uUacted at a constant
 rala from the source; moisture is removed from the sam-
 ple stream and determined  either  voltuneirtcally or
 fravuoetrinUy.
   1.2  AppllcabOAy.  This  method  Is applicable  lor
 determining the moisture content of slack got,
   Two procedure* are given. The first is  a rrfereoca
 method, for accurate determinations of moisture content
 (such as ore  needed to calculate emission  data). The
 second U  an approsimatioa method, which provides
 Mtimati of percent moisture to  aid In setting isoklnetlo
 sampling rates  prior to a pollutant emission measure-
 ment run. The approximation method described herein
 is  only  a suggested approach;   alternative means  for
 apprniinuting ilie moisture content, e.g., drying tubes,
 wet bulb-dry  bulb techniques, condonation  techniques,
 gtoichiofnclric calculations, previous eipericnce,  etc.,
 are also acoptabl*.
  Tbe reference method Is often conducted simultane-
 ously with a pollutant emission measurement run; when
 It h, calculation of percent isoltinetlc, pollutant emission
 rate, etc., for  the run shall be oa?*d upon the results of
 the reference method or its equivalent; tbcse calculations
 shall not be based upon the results of the approximation
 method, unless the approximation ruribod is shown, to
 the satisfaction of th« Administrator, U.S. Environmen-
 tal Protection Agency, to be capable of yielding results
 within 1 percent HiO of the reference mi'thod.
  NOTE.—The reference method  may yield questionable
 results when  applied  to  saturated gas streams  or  to
 stri-ams that  contain water droplets  Therefore   when
 these conditions exist or are snsperUd, a second deter-
 mination of the moisture content shall be made  simul-
 taneously with the reference method, as follows: Assume
 that the  gas stream  is saturated. Attach a temperature
 aensor (capable of measuring to   -1°  C (2*  F)|  to  the
 reference method probe. Measure the stack gas tempera-
 tun at each traverse point (we Section 2.2.1) during the
 reference method traverse: calculate the average  stack
(as temperature. Neit, determine the moisture percent-
 age  either by:  (1)  using a psychromethc  chart and
 making  appropriate  corrections il stark  pressure  it
 different  from  that of the chart,  or (2) using saturation
 vapor pressure tables. In cases where the Dsychrometrie
chart or  the saturation vapor pressure tables an not
applicable (based on  evaluation of the process), alternate
methods, subj
-------
        FILTER
 (EITHER  IN STACK
OR  OUT Of STACK)
                                          STACK
                                           WALL
                         CONDENSER-ICE BATH SYSTEM INCLUDING
                                                   SILICA  GEL TUBE —-7
                                           Figure  4-1.   Moisture  sampling  train-reference  method.
   Z.l.1  Probe. The prob* Is  constructed of stainless
 ntf\ or class tubing, sufficiently heated to  prevent
 water condensation, and is equipped with a filter, either
 ln-ctack (• f. . a plug of plass wool  Inserted into the end
 ol th< probe) or heated  out-slack  (e.g., as described in
 Method 5), 10 remove paniculate matter.
   H'ben nack conditions permit, other metals or plastic
 tubing may be used lor the probe, subject to the approval
 ol the Administrator.
  2.1.2  Condenser.   The  condenser  consists  of  four
 tapinrers coojioctcd in  scries trith rround class, leak-
 Irw Iiltines or any similarly leak-tree non-contaminating
 fittings. The first, third, and fourth impinc.c/3 shall be
 of the Grrenrnjrg-Smilh desicn. modified  by replacing
 Ihe tip  wilb a 1.3 centimeter (H  inch) ID class tube
 axtenoine  to about 1.3 cm  (M in.)  from the bottom of
 the fta^k. The second impinger shall b« of th» Greenburg-
 Bmitb delicti with the standard tip. Modifications (e.g.,
 nslne flriible connections between  the implngers, using
 material* other than  class, or usins  flexible vacuum lines
 to coonect  the filler  holder to  the condenser) may b«
 roe-d, subject to the approval of the Administrator.
  The first two Impinccrs slmll  contain known volumes
 of water, the third shall be empty, and the fourth shall
contain  a known weight of ft- to 16-mosh Indicating type
 (iUea  {el, or »crolvalent  desiccanl. If  lh« silica gel has
 been previously used, dry ai 175* C  (350° F) for 2 hours.
New silica jel may be used as received. A thermometer,
eapnble  of measurin; temperature to within 1* C  12°  F),
shall be placed at the outlet of tbe fourtb Impinges, fir
monitoring purposes.
  Alternatively, any  system may  b«  used (subject to
 the approval of the Administrator) that cools the sample
fas stream and allows neasurement of both the water
 that has been condensed and the  moisture leaving th«
condenser, each to within 1  ml or 1  f. Acceptable means
mrt  lo .measure  tbe condensed  water,  either  gravi-
metrically  or volumetrically. and  lo measure  the mots-
ton  leaving the  condenser by:  (1)  monitoring  tb«
 temperature and pressure at the eilt  of the condenser
and " prevent
moisture  condensaiion  In  the  pump and  metering
devices  and to  avoid  the nejMJ to make corrections for
moisture io the mrtcrcd  volume
  2.1.3  Cooling  System An  Ice bath container and
crushed ice (or equivalent) are usrd to aid in condf rising
moisture.
  2.1.4   Metering System. This system Includes a vac-
uum gauge, leak-free  pump,  thermometers capable of
measuring temperature to within 3* C (S.<°  F), dr> gas
met«r capable of measuring  volume to within 2 percent,
and related  equipment as shown  io Figure 4-1. Other
metering systems,  capable  of  maintaining  a  constant
sampling rale and determining  sample gas volume, may
be u.««d, subject to tbe approval of the Administrator.
  2.1-5  Barometer. Mercury,  aneroid, or  other barom-
eter capable of measuring atmospheric pressure  lo within
2.4 mm Hg (0.1 In. Hg) may br used. In many  uses, ttie
barometric reading  may be obtained  from  a nearby
national weather sendee station,  in wblcb case the sta-
tion value  (which is  the absolute barometric  pressure)
ihall  b< requested  and  a/i adjustment  for  elevation
differences  between  the  wrather'SLaiion and  tbe  sam-
pling pnlnt shall  be applied at a rate of mlnu< 2J rr-m Hg
(0.1 In. Bg) per  30 ra  (100 ft)  elevation lucrcase or vice
versa lor elevation decrease.
  2.1.8   Graduated  Cylinder  and/or  BaUnet.  These
Items are used to measure condensed water and moL-tur»
caught In the silica gel to within 1  ml or OJ j  Graduated
cylinders sbaU have subdivisions no greater than 2 znL
tlcei laboratory  balances are capable of weighing to the
nearest CU j or les.  Tbcse balances art suitable lor
use  bert.                                  ^
  2.3  Procedure. The foDowJng procedure Is written for
a eoodenser tr^fta  (such  as  tbe Unpinfer  fyslezn de-
                       11-48 •.
                                                                                                        •cribed in Section 2.1.2) Incorporating volumetric analy-
                                                                                                        sis to measure tbe condensed moisture, and silica gel and
                                                                                                        fravimetnc aoalrsi* to measure tbe moisture leaving tht
                                                                                                        condenser
                                                                                                          2.2.1  U nJo.<3 otherwise specified by tbe Administrator,
                                                                                                        a minimum  of eigbt  traverse points  shall be used  (or
                                                                                                        circular stacks having diameters less than O.C1 ID (24 in.),
                                                                                                        a minimum of nine point? shall be UM.-d for rectangular
                                                                                                        stacks bav.ng equivalent  diameters  lcs« than 0.61 m
                                                                                                        (24 in.), and a mi;iirjium of twelve tmvcrs points 5hall
                                                                                                        be used in all otber cavs.  The traverse points shall be
                                                                                                        located  according io Method 1. The use ol fower pomls
                                                                                                        Is suhjrci to the approval of the Administrator. Solrel i
                                                                                                        suilaMr  pr«jl'f anil probe Irncth such  that all traverse
                                                                                                        points can >-e uui|ilvd. Consider sampling Irom opiwsiw
                                                                                                        sides of tbe sli'-k (four total  sampling ports) for  larca
                                                                                                        itacks. to permit u.=e of shorter pn.bc lengths. Mark tbe
                                                                                                        probe with heat  resistant tape or by conic otbcr Dicthod
                                                                                                        to denote the proper distance into tbe  stack or duct (or
                                                                                                        each sampling point.  ?lace known volumes of watrr in
                                                                                                        the first Im-o  linpjngcrs. Welch antl record the weiplit cf
                                                                                                        tbe silica pel to  the nearest O.S c. and transfer the  silica
                                                                                                       •gel to the lounh impinper; alternatively, the silica gul
                                                                                                        may UTS* b* traiufcrrod to the Imiiingcr, and thr wriglit
                                                                                                         of the silica pel plus impinger n^-orded.
                                                                                                          2.2.J  £rl»ei a total samiiling lime suci that a  mini-
                                                                                                        mum lol^l gas volume of U.Oli sera (21 seO »'H be col-
                                                                                                        lecud, at a rale no greater tban 0.021 m'/min (0.75  dm).
                                                                                                        Wben both moist ui« content and pollutant emission r»U
                                                                                                        arc to b< d«teroijned.  tbe moisture determinatioo iball
                                                                                                        be limuJtaneous with, and for tbe same total  length of
                                                                                                        'lime as, the pollutant emission rate run, unless olhcrwiat
                                                                                                        (pecl.Vd In an applicable subpan ol the standards.
                                                                                                          2-SJ  Ekt op tbe sampling  train as shown  in Figun
                                                                                                        4-1.  Turn on tbe probe  healer  and  (if applicable) tb«
                                                                                                        nll*r besting sysum  to  temperatures  of about 120* 0
                                                                                                        (248*  F),  to  prevent  mater condensation  ahead of tb«
                                                                                                        condenser-, allow time for the teraporaluru to stabUii*.
                                                                                                        Place erusbed Ice in tbe lee batb container. It U recoov
                                                                                                        mended, bat not required, that a leak check be done, ai
                                                                                                        fellows: Discoacecl the probe,  from tbe unt Impimtf or

-------
(If applicable) from the Utter holder. Plug the Inlet ta tbe
first tinpingar (or uJtrr lioMer) and pull a3SO mm (15 in )
n»  vacuum;«lower vacuum may be used, provided tbat
it is not etri-rdcd durinc the test. A  leakage  nle  in
eicc&i oi •* percent of Uic svv rare saraplinz rate or (1,00057
mVmm  (O.W cfm),  whichever Is less, is unacceptable.'
Following the  eak  clicck, reconnect the prob* to the
aampling train.
  2J.4   During the  sampling  run, maintain a sampling
raU within 10 percent o( constant rate, or u specified br
the Admiiuitrmtor.  For rarb run. record  Ibe data rt-
SHired on Ux uampla data sheet shown in Figure 4-2.
 e lure to record th« dry fis meter reading  at tie begin-
ning and end ole*cb sampling time Increment and vheo-
  t OCATION	

  OfERATOR	

  DATE	

  HUM NO	

  AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.

  •AROMETRIC PRESSURE.

  MOSE LENGTH m(ft)	
erer amptlng Is balt«d. Take otbor approprlaU
at eacb sample point, at \aui ooca during each tima
Increment.
  2.2.3  To beftn sampling, position tbe probe tip at tba
first traverse point. Immediately ct&rt the pump and
adjust tbe flow to  tbe desired rate. Traverse the crosi
lection, sampling at  each traverse  point (or  an equal
length of time. Add more Ice and, If necessary, salt to
maintain a temperature of leu than 20* C (GS* F) at tbe
tillca gel outlet.
  12.1 Aftar collecting the sample, disconnect the probe
from the filter holder (or from tbe first lmpinger)and con-
duct a leak check (mandatory) ai described In Section
*3. J. Record tbe leak rate. I/ the Vtfaje rate f irreds the
allowable rate, the l&ster itiall other relrcl the test n-
fuJts or shall correct tbe sample volume as In Section 6.3
of Method A.Neit, measure the volume of th«  moisture
conderued to the near&il mi. Determine the increase in
weight of the silica gel (or silica gxl pirn ImpinCT) u> tbe
nearest 0^ g. Record this inform*Uoa (see eiftmple data
ib«t. Figure 4-3) and calculate tbe moisture percentage,
u described In 2J below.
  2.3  Calculations. Carry out tb»toOowiiig calculations,
retaining at least one eitra deciraal figure beyond that of
tbe acquired data. Round ofl ajura afur liaal calcula-
                                                            JCHEMATIC OF STACK CROSS SECTION
TRAVERSE POINT
NUMBER





•









TOTAL
SAMPLING
TIME
(9), mia.










!

-



AVERAGE
STACK
TEMPERATURE
•C(°F)











'



•

PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
ACROSS
ORIFICE METER
(AH).
mmr»j HJO

















METER
READING
GAS SAMPLE
VOLUME
•3 (h3)












•




AV«
«3(hJ)
'.
















GAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
AT DRY GAS METER
INLET
fT»iJ. »C Crl










"

-


A.*.
Av»..
OUTLET
fT«,ut). »C («F1

'









.



A*

TEMPERATURE
OF GAS
LEAVING
CONDENSER OR
LASTIMPINGER.
•CPF)















-

                                                 Figure 4-2.  Field moisture determination-reference method.
                                                                      11-49

-------

HUM.
INFTIAL
DimrtHCi
WINCH
VOLUUE.
•M



jncAca.
«IGHT.
f



       Figure 4-1 Antlytkjl d»u • reference m«thod
   2.8.1  Nomenclature.
      B,.- Proportion of water Taper, by volume, In
            the gas stream.
       JU»-Molecu)ar weight ol water. 18.0  rt-mol«
             'or Enclish unit*.
       T«,«Absolute temperature at meter, K (*R).
      T.n—Standard absolute  temperature,  293*  K
           • (MS" K).
       V«—Dry gas Tolome measured by dry gas meter,
           dem (dcfl.
      AV.- Incremental  dry  gas Tolume measured by
           dry gas meter at each traTcrse point, dem
           (del).
   V.f.u)—Dry gas rolorae measured by tbe dry gal
            meter,  corrected to  standard  conditions,
           dscm (dscf).
   V»«l.u) — Volume  of water vapor collected In aflloa •
           fel  corrected to ftandard  conditions, aexn
           (sen.
       Vj—Tina] Tolame of condenser  water, ml.
       Vt^lnitial Tolume, I/ any, of condenser water,
           ml.
       W," Final weight of silica gel or aQica gel plus
           Iropinger, g.
       JT.-lnltlal  weight of tfllca gel or iffic* gel plus
           Imping tr. g.
        y-Dry gu meter calibration factor.
       F.-Density  of   water,  0.9982 g/ml  (0.002201
           Ib/ml).
  S.3.2 Volume of wsler vapor condensed.
                                      Equation 4-1
where:
  iTi-0 001333 ni'i'ml for metric units
     -0.CM/07 (I'/ml for English units
  2.3.3  Volume of water vapor collected  In silica gel.
when:
  A'i-0.001336 m'/IT for metric nnlts
    -O.CH71J ft>/g for English nnlli
  3.1.4  Sample gas Tolum*.
                                      Eqaatlon 4-9
                   =A-,y IrZ!=

                                        K'luatlou 4-3
 where:
   A*>-0.3ȣ8 'K/inrn Ug for metric nulls
      -17.M "RKD. Ug lor English anils

   NOTZ.—If the post-test leak  rate  (Section 2.2.0) ex-
 ceeds Ui4 allowable  rate, correct  the  value -of V. In
 Equation 4-3, as described In Section 6.3 of Method i.
   2.3.6  Moisture Content.
        *j
                   • *rt ( ~T » f
               '• re {
                                      Equation 4—4

   XOTE. — In saturated  or moisture droplet-laden gas
 streams, two calculations of tbe moisture content of tbe
 stack raj  shall be made, one usin^ a ralue bacrd upon
 the saturated conditions (see Section 1.2), and another
 based upon the  results  of the impinfer analysis.  The
 lower of tbeM two values of B*. sball be considered cor-
 rect.
   J-3.0  Verification of constant sampling rate. For each
 time  increment, determine the il'.. CaJculate  tbe
 average. If the value for any time Increment differs from
 the average by more than 1U percent, reject the results
 and repeal tbe run.

 3. Approj, motion A/rfW

   The approTtniation method  descn>«ed  below Is  pre-
 Knted only as a suggested  method (set Section 121.
   3.1  Apparatus.
 •  3.1 .1  Probe. Stainless steel or glass tubing, sufficiently
 heated to prevent water  condensation and equipped
 with a filter (either  In-staci or heated out-stack) to re-
 move paniculate matter. A plug of glass wool, inserted
 tnlo tbe end of tbe probe, Is a satisfactory filter.
  3.1.2  Impingen. Two midget  impingers, each  with
 30 ml rapacity, or equivalent.
  3.1.3  Ice Bath. Container and  ice, to aid  in condens-
 ing moisture In impingers.
  3.1.4  Drying  Tube. Tube packed with  pew  or re-
 generated  A- to 16-mesh indicatin?-tvpe silica gel (or
 equivalent dcsicrant), to dry tlie sample ga; and to pro-
 tect the meter and pump.
  3.1.4 Valve. Needle valve, to regulate the sample gas
 flow rate.
  3.1.6  Pump. Leak-free,  diaphragm type, or equiva-
 lent, to pull, tbf gas sample through the train.
  3.1.7  Volume meter. Dry gas meicr, sufCcienUy ac-
 rurate to measure tbe sample volume within 2%. and
 calibrated  over the range of now rales  and conditions
 actually encountered during itamplinf.
  3.1.8  Bate Meter.  Roiameter, to measure  the flow
 range from  Oto3 I  pm (0 to 0.11 crni).
  3.1.9  Graduated Cylinder. 25 ml.
  3.1.10  Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barom-
 eter, as described  in Section 2.1.5 above.
  3.1.11  Vacuum Gauge. At least 760 mm  Eg  (30 In.
 Bg) gauge, to be used for  the sampling leak check.
  3.2  Procedure.
  3.2.1  Place exactly 5 ml  distilled  water in e*ch Im-
 pinger. Assemble the apparatus without tbe probe as
shown in Figure 4-4. Leak  check tbe train by placing a
vacuum  gauge at the Inlet to  the  nrst impingcr and
drawing  a  vacuum of at  least 250 mm Bg (10 In. Bg),
plugging the outlet of the roiametcr, and then turning
on* the pump. Tbe vacuum shall remain constant for at
Mst  one minute.  Carefully release  the vacuum gauge
Ibefbre unplugging tbe rotameter end.
                                                 11-50-

-------
HEATED PROBE
SILICA GEL TUBE
RATE METER,
    VALVE
              ~v
  MIDGET IMPINGERS
             PUMP
       Figure 4-4.  Moisture-sampling train - approximation method.
 LOCATION.
 TEST
                              COMMENTS
 DATE
 OPERATOR
 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
CLOCK TIME

•



GAS VOLUME THROUGH
METER, (Vm)",
m3 (ft3)
-




RATE METER SETTING
nrVmin. (fvVmin.)



•
j
METER TEMPERATURE.
°C (°F)
•




  Figure 4-5.  Field moisture determ.ination - approximation method.
                             II-5T

-------
    3.;.;  (Vinr.'rt lh» prob*. Invrt It Into the stick. and
   Kimi.lo at > cnr:.-..iT.t rue of 21pm (0.071 dio). Comlnu*
   ff.lnpline cnul tlie  dry fn« mr'.tl rrz:r!en al>out 30
   liler? (I.I ft') or until vi>;iile liquid dropim are carried
   ore/  from tlif fuvl  Impineer lo the »rooud.  Kecoid
   tr.-rn. ranife, prf.vurr. ar.d dry  g=s Dicier  readings u
   required  by Fjjrjre 4-J.
    3.2.1 After ci-lleciing the  sample, corntlnt the con-
   tent j of the t»'o ij5pir.;trj and rorisure Ibe volume to tb«
  ^l(^rr«T 0.5 ml.
    3.3  Calculations. TL^dcul.-.tflon method  prfwntedls
  dr.ci^npd  to r5tirra(e tbe moisture in Ibe  nick cu:
  th«r/ore, other d>!i, irblch ire  only npcc«ary for «a-
  cumtF moisture dctrnnlnatipns,  »re not -collwrtcd. Tb«
  foltovlng f^uaUon* id^qu«l^7 e^limate  Tb* mobJuri
  eentcnt, tar the pu-'poie ol detennjnlns boUnetic MJH-
  plinc rate »ttinf j.
    3.3.1  Nomrrr!a!nrt.
      B ••" Approxirztte  proportion, bT  volume,  at
            vater vapor  In the ru strum luring  U>«
            second Implnpir, 0.025.
       B.."-W»i(r rapor tn the {ti slrram, proportion by

       A/.

       P*

      .P,iv
      T".i/
           (sa- R)
       V/ — Final volume of Lmpinper oontfnU. ml,
       Vi-«»lruti&J volume of impinper oontenu, ml.
       V.-Dry pas Toiume mexmred by dry gw m«t«,
           dcm (dcO.
   lr«(t(4)HDrr pas volume measured by dry gu meter,
        •   corrected  lo  lundard  condiuons,   dxm
           (dscfl.
  Vwgc.iwj^Volume ofvater Tapor condensed, corrected
           to standard conditions, son (s«f).
       ..-Density of water. O.WS2 g/ml (0.002201 I
  3.3.2 Volume of water vapor collected.
                               ci.nlrnl.

                                  /—;+<°-025)

                                    Equation i-7


   4.1  For the reference method, calibrate equipment as-
 fpvcffird iu tbe following sections of Method 5: Ei-CUon 5.1
 (mMerinp lysleni); Section 5.5 (tcmff-ratare  gauges);
 and  Section 5.7 fbaro.nr.cr).  Tbo rrcoaunrndt-dlfftk
 cJbfck of the metering lystezn (Srrtfon 5.8 of Method  i)
 also applies to thf refcrfnce mclhod. For ibc »pproiiiii»-
 tlon method, use the proc^durrs outlined in Srcuon 5.1.1
 Of Method 6 to calibrate tbe mrtrrinr 5>strm,  a:id Ibe
 procedure of Mclbod 5,  Section 5.7  10  cnhbrate  the
 bajomcler.
•Molecular  Tffpht of waltr, 13.0'g/s-iDoU     5-
 (18.0'b.1b-mole)
• Absolute pressure (for this mctbod, same u
 baiomnric pressure) at Ibe dry pas meter.
• StAJidird  ah&olule  pressure, 760 mm  Hg
 (29.P2 in. Hg).
• Idfol taa corjrtAnt,  O.OC234 (mm Hp) (m1)/
 (j-molf)  f°K) for metric units a/id 21J15
 (in.  Ht)  (fi^/lb-iDole)  <"K)  tor  English
 uniu.
• Absolute Uimpcrature at meter, *K (*R)
' Standard  absolute   tempcraiur«,  293*   K
  1. Air Pollution Enifineeriii|t Manual (Si cond Edition).
Danie}son, J. A. (ed.). U.S. EnrtronireJilal Protection
Agency, Office of Air Quality Plaiiniup and Standards.
RewArcb Triangle Pa/*, K.C. 1'ublicanon No. Al'-lO.
1973.
  2. Devorkin, Howard, elal. Air Pollution Source Test-
In? Manual. Air Pollution Control Disuia, Lo- Angelea,
Calif. November, 1963.
  3. Methods  for Determination of Velocity, Volume.
Dust and Mist Content of Gav.v We5iem  Precipitation
Division of ;oy Manufacturing  Co., Lo! Angeles, Calif.
Bulletin WP-iO. 1968.
                                   Equation 4-5
 where:
  K,-0.0011T3 nii.'inl for metric units
     -O.W
-------
WETBon  e—t>tn«mv»T>ON  or  St'tn i   liioin-t
       Ziiiaaioxa Fmoai StJUio.Mai Eoi m LS

1-  fritfivlt sue1 A rtWicatam

  1.1  Principle  A fas sample Is eilrvird  from the
mmplinj  pomi In  the stack.  Tbe lulluric acid misi
(including  sulfur trioiidr) and  tbe sulfur  dioxide arr
•aparaied.  Tbe sulfur  dioxide tracuoo u measured by
tbe barium-thorm ntratton method.
  1.2  Applicability. Thu method U applicable tor UM
•termination of sulfur dinnde erumons from sutlonary
sources. The minimum detectable limit of  toe method
he* been determined to be 3.4 milligrams (ru«i of SOi'm'-
(2,12X10~; 4i>1i>). Although no upper limit  has been
t»tablube
Ufh as 10.000 mg'nj' o( bOt can be roUecieO trnclrntlj
in iwo mideet  Impingcn, each  containing 15 milluiierV
o(3 peroenrhydrogen  wronje. al a rale ol 1.0 Ipm for
20 minute;. Based on ibeorrucal calculations Uw upper
•onoeniraiian limit in  a JO-Uiei  aample is about M tut
BC 'Tli'.
  Possible  interlvrenu are free ammonia, waler-eoluble
eaiions. and fluoride;. Tbe  cations and fluorides are
rtmoveJ br glais cool fillrrs and ac iaopropanol bubbler
•nd hence  do not afleci the SOianaUjij. M  hen sample
ore being lasrn from a tas stream wnb  UiRli conctnira-
ttons o( vary line metallic fumes  (such ti  In  Inlets  to
eonirol dericeei, a hich-efncirocy glass nlxr filler mu.*i
be used in plavr ol the gla.v wool plug  ti.e.. the one  ID
the prol*1  to remove the cation intctleieni?.
  Tree anunonia interleirs by rvarting »ith  SOj lo form
paniculate  sutnie and by  re*vtin« with the indicator
If free ammonia u  prewnl (this can be determined by
knowledge of the process and noticing white parucuiau
sootier ID tbe probe and leoproi^enol bubble:), alterna-
tive melliods. sul>|m lo the approval  '
tor,   !].£.   Enrironnu-ntal  J'rotef-ti
required.
                                                       11.10  Volome  Metar.  Dry  n> BMUr, •offidently
                                                      atoorat* to measure the aunple Totume within 2 percent,
                                                      calibrated  at  tbe  aelwled  flow rate and  condJtiom
                                                      actual) >  encountered  durint aunpllnf. and  equipped
                                                      with a temperature faucr (Ola) thermometer, or eqult-
                                                      alant) capable  ol  meuurinf temperature  to  within
                                                      fC (*.«•/).
                                                       11.11  Barometer. Mercury, ameroid, or other baron>-
                                                      •tar oapabU of measuring atmoiphertc preaaure to within
                                                      It mro Bf (0 1 In. HI ).  In many ou»s, the baromelrlt:
                                                      iwadinf ma>- be obtained from i nearby national w«ainer
                                                      •rrioe nation. In which oaw the nation ralue  (which
                                                      » the absolute barometric pmsure) ihall  be rrquejlM
                                                      and an  adjustment for  elevation  dlflerenrts between
                                                      the weather tutloo and Mmpllni point in all be applixi
                                                      aiaraUofmlnusJ.imm Hf (0.1 In. Hi) per JO m (100ft)
                                                      aa>T»tlon tncree* or  riot Teraa  for deration decreaac
                                                       11.12  Vacuum Oauf«. At least 760 mm HI (10 In.
                                                      H«) ttutr, to be need lor leak  check of the aampllnf
                                                      train.
                                                       12  Sample Raco»«ry.
                                                       12.1  Waab bottlea. Polyethylene or flaat, HO ml,
                                                      two
                                                       12.1  Btoract Bottles  Polyethylene, 100 ml, to  store
                                                      Implnfer aamplei (one per sample).
                                                       S.I  Analysis.
                                                       U.I  Pipettes Volumetric type, Mnl, JO-mJ (one per
                                                      aunple), and 2Sml ati«9
                                                       11.3  Volumetric T laaka. 100-ml lUe (one per aample)
                                                      IBd 100-ml tlae.
                                                       i-I.I  BureUea 5- and SO-ml dies.
                                                       14. (  Xrlenmeyer Tlaiks. IbO ml^iu  (ooe far  each
                                                      aampk, blank, and rtarrdard).
                                                       U.i  Dropping Bottle  lli-ml tlte, to add Indicator.
                                                       JJ.e  Oraduatad Cyllado. lOO-ml die.
                                                       11.7  Bpectropbotomvtar .  TV meavure abaorbance a.
                                                      MI Danameten
  11  ftampUm  Tb* avmpUoe train U abovn la
*-l, and  eomponent paru an dlioiBed below.  Toe
ta«ui  hu tbi  optkio  of rotatltatlm  auoplint  «qup-
   m d«cnb*d Ic Method 8 in place ol tbe nud«ei 1m-
   ter fqoipmem ol Method 6. Hovrrer. tbe Method 8
   ln muT be modin«4 to Include k heated fljier b«twaea
the  probe and Isopropanol Lmpuifer, and tbe operation
tt tbe  mnpUot tmo and ample inilyms toad be at
Ux flov ma arid aoluuon Tolus«9 defined in Method 8
  The tester also n&s the option ol d«tcrmjnjoc  8Oi
Mmult&neou&lv vlth paniculate  matur and moisture
4elennjnaiion£ by (1) replacing the vaier In a Method 5
impinfer  iTTum «1th I peraat  perioiide tolatioQ, or
(f)  by repUcun  the, Method i water impinctr lyneTT.
with a Method i l*opropaBo!-nlUr-peroilde iytt«m.  The
ftoaJyiifl lor SOi mufl n coniistent wILh the prooedore
in Method 8.
  LI.]   Probe. Borosilicate tlaas, or itainlM »K*1 (gtber
•Mtnnili  of oonttruetloo  may  bt owd, nb)«ct to Ihe
ftpproTal  ol tbe  A&mininraiar),  approiimaiely o-mrn
tndde diamei«r, wltb a b«aan«  lystem  lo preTem water
eeedeoaatlon aad a filler (either Ln-ttack or boated  out-
•teck)  to  remove panicalate matter, l&dudinc  lullunc
•dd mi5t. A plot of (Use wool li a latuiairtory filur.
  J.U  Bubbler  and impintfn.  Ooe  midget bubbler,
with medliun-coane lias  Ml and borotllicau or qoani
Ckus wool packed  In top  (x*  Flfun 4-1) lo pre'ent
        add mi*t  cajryo'er,  and torae Sf>roJ  midget
           The bubbler and mid«rt lmpln«en moil be
          In Kriea with leak -Cm (Us coruxcton.  Btli-
aon< trout may be tued. If ou laiary. U prt'tnt le*ka>e.
  At tbe option of tbe IsrUr. > mJdf et Implofer may be
IMd In clace of tbe mldcet bubbler.
  Othar ccUertloc abxrrben and flow rates may be UMO,
fcot  an fub)ect to tb«  approra]  of tbe Administrator.
A^o, oolierlloo efficiency mu« be ibown to be at  leaft
M percent for ea£b left run and mujt b« documented In
tbe report. If tbe efficiency U found to be acceptable  after
a teriee of three  tesu, further documentation ij not
Twauij»d  To conduct  the  efficiency te«t,  an extra ab-
acrber muft be added  and analyzed  Mparately.  Toll
aartn abeorber mur. net ooctaln more than 1 percent el
tki total 80i.
  J.1J  Qiao Wool. BorwllleaU  or qoartt.
  1.1 4  Stopcock  Oreaje   Autone-lnwlubk,  kaat-
•table lUloone r«a*e may be u»ed If n«c«aar».
  XI i  Temperature  O»uft   Dial  tb*rmom«Ur. •
•oolralent to  meuure temperatun of fa» Imrtat UB-
mLftr train to within 1* C if 7.)
        Drrlnt Tub*. Tub* packed wtth*- to l«-m«ah
           tn* «"!«» «''. » wjalTaJeat, to dry tbe n«
                                                        T7nlee9 otherwiae Indicated, all raafrnt* muat conform
                                                      to tbe ipecinratioru established by tbe Commirtee on
                                                      Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Eociet)
                                                      Where such specifications are not available, use the best
                                                      arallable grade.
                                                        «-l  BampUoi.
                                                        1.1.1   Water7l>ionlJ«d,a^tmed to conform Ui A STM
                                                      apeclnration Dl 195-74, Type >. At tbe option  ol the
                                                      analyst, the KMjiO. test for oii&iable organic mattfr
                                                      may be omitted when high concentrations of orfarui
                                                      natter are not elpected to bf present.
                                                        1.1.2  laopropanol, 90 perofnt. Mil 80ml of isopropanol
                                                      •with 30m) of deiomied djsUUed water. Check each lot of
                                                      Itopropanol  for peroildf  impuriun as follows  tbakr  10
                                                      ml of isopropanol  wltb  10 ml  of freshly  prepared  10
                                                      percent  pouj*ium  Iodide solution  Prepare a blank by
                                                      similarly treating 10ml of distilled water  After 1 minute,
                                                      read the aosorhence al  l&j  nanometers on a rpectro-
                                                      pcolomeler  If abaorbance  exceeds  0.1, reject alcohol lor
                                                      oar
                                                        Peroxides may be removed trom  isopropanol by redis-
                                                      tilling or  by  panage through a  column  of activated
                                                      ahiirana;  however,  reagent  grade  ianpropano!   with
                                                      Kliably low peroxide level; may be obtained from com-
                                                      mercial  sources. Rejection of contaminated  lots may,
                                                      therefore, be a more efficient procedure
                                                        1.1.1   fi>droffn Peroxide, 1 Percent. Dilute K percent
                                                      hydrogen  peroxide 1:» (v/v)  with deiomied. distilled
                                                      water (M ml Is nwded per  aample). Prepare trrjh dally
                                                        1.1.4   Potassium  Iodide Solution, 10 Percent. PissoKe
                                                      10.0 grams XI  in deionited, distilled water and dllule  to
                                                      100 ml. Prepare when needed
                                                        1.2  Sample  Recovery
                                                        1.2.1   Water. Deioniied, distilled, u In 11.1.
                                                        1.2.2  Ijopropanol. 80 Percent MJI 80 ml of isopropano!
                                                      with 2(1  ml of delonlud. dlsdu>d water
                                                        IJ  Analysis
                                                        Ml   Waler. Delonlted, distilled, as In 3.1.1.
                                                        UJ   Isopropanol, 100  percent
                                                        1.1.1   Thortn    Indicator    l-(o-ar»nopbenylazo)-:-
                                                      napblbo)-3,6-dJ5ul(onic acid,  disodium salt, or equjva-
                                                      sant Dissolve OJO g  In 100 ml of dekmited, dl5tiUed
                                                      mtar
                                                        IJ4   Barium ParchloraU  Solution,  00100 K.  Dis-
                                                      a»rvi 1 »S f of barium percnloraw trlhTdrate IBairiO.li
                                                      IHiOl In 200 ml djstilied  water and dlluu to 1 liur wlih
                                                       topropanol  Alternatively. I  22 g of |B«Clr2H,01 ma>
                                                      be  osed insleed of tee  parcbiorate  Standardue  w  In
 •ample and to protect tie meter and pump. U Uw dliac
 JJl bai been uA prevloujlj. dry « Hi* C («OT 7) Jor
 J houn. Ne* iUi=» jeJ maj be used as received. AJlema-
 BTely  other  type* of desircanu (MUiralejit or better)
 maTbeoaeiJ  fuolect lo approTalof Ihe Administrator.
  1.1.7  Value, Keedle ralue, to reattl»!« aampk fai flow

 **li.8  Pnmp.  l^ak-lree  diiphrafm pomp, or equiT-
 al«t to poll  C»» tbroufb tbe train. ln«*U  i unal) tank
 between  the  pump and rale  metei to eliminate  the
 notation ^e^ °' l" *»Por>«™ P<"OP »° th« rotameter.
 ^t\»  Rate Meter.  Rotajueier, or eqol»al«nt, capable
 ft meaaurlnf flor rate to within J percent et UK aelected
 low rale  of about 1000 oe/mln.
                                                        11-5  Sulrurlc Acid Standard, 0 0100 N. Purchase or
                                                       itandardlie lo «0 0005 N a»*ln« 0.0100 N NaOH which
                                                       has  previously  been standardlted  against  potassium
                                                       add phthalate (primary standard grade).

                                                       4. Pnctiw

                                                        4.1  Sampling.
                                                        4.1.1  Preparation of collection train. Measure 15 ml o<
                                                       M percent uopropanol Into the rn^ltet bubbler and li
                                                       ml of 3 percent hydrogen perotlde into each of the first
                                                       two m)d«ft Implngerj  Leave the final midget implrwer
                                                       dry  Assemble the train as jho»-n In Figure 6-1  Adjust
                                                       probe healer to a temperature nuTicient to prevent veter
                                                       oonderjatloa. Pkca  cruibed  ice and water around UM
                                                       imping en.
  4 1 1  Leak-cbeck procedure  A leak chert prior to the
sampUnf run it optional however, a leak rherk a/ler the
aampllng run l> mandatory Tbe teak-check procedure is
as follows
  Wltb the probe divonnerted. place a vacuum rattfe at
tbe Inlet to Ihe  bubbler and pull i  vacuum  ol 230 mm
(10 In ) Hg. plug or pinch off Ihe outlet of tbe flow meter,
and then turn oft the pump The vacuum shall remain
stable  lor  at  least K  seconds  Carefully  release the
vacuum game  before-releasing tbe  flow  meter end to
prevent bark flow of lift Impinge/ fluid
  Other leak check  procedures may  be used, subject to
tbe approval of tbe  Administrator. U 8  Environmental
Protection  Atencj  The procedure used  In Method 5  is
not suitable lor diaohcagm pump>
  4 1 3  Sample  collecHon  Record the Initial dry gw
meter reading and  barometric pressure  To begin  sam-
pling, position the tip o' the probe al the sampling point,
connect the probe to the bubbler, and start  the piimp
Adjust  the aample flow  to  a constant rate of ap*
proiimately 1 0 hter'mln ei Indicated by tbe  rotameter
Maintain this  constant  rate («10 percent) during the
entire  sampling run  Take reading?  (dry gas meter.
temperatures at dry gas meter  and at  Implnxer outlet
and rale meter)  at Vast  every i minutes  Add more loe
during the run  to  keep the  temperature of tbe  gases
leaving the last Implnger at 20* C if T) or less At the
conclusion of each run. turn off the pump, remove probe
from tbe 
-------
  5.2  Ttormomeun.  Calibrate
flaji thermometers.
  t.l  Rotameter. The rotaiaeler n»d not be calibrated
but ibould be cleaned and malataloed acooniUx to UM
aanuiactunr'i innrucUon.
  1.4  Barometer  Calibrate afainit a mercury barom-
eter.
  tJ  Barium Percblorate  Solution. Standard! i» UM
barium perehlonte lolction afiioJt Z3 ml of  nandard
nlfuric acid to vhlcb 100 ml at 100 pvoeat laopropanol
hat beau added.
  Carry oat calculation!, retaining it lean one extra
decimal flmnJxrond ibal of the »c^uir»d du&. Kaacd
  4.1  NoiD«)claturi.
          eomeud to
         06/dscn.
                     of nUur dJaildc. drr  bMii
                            oondltlotu, mc/d«an
                   of tmrlarn p»rctilor»« Utrvit,
                          it tb« exit ortfloe of U»
         dry ru meter, nun U| (In. Hf).
    /•, j - 8lind»rd  «b«oluie  preuun, 7W  mm  Hf
         (S.Kin. HI).
     T.-ATenft dry r»» m«>«r  «b«oluu umpentan,
         •K CR).
    T«j-8l»ndxrd  tbaolatt  tcapennm,  «O*  X
         «a' R).
     V,- Volume of ample ill q not turned, ml.
     V.»Drr 01 Tolnme u sauand br tb* dry (••
              . dem (drf».
                                                          fat Tolume meamnrl  by  the dry tai
                                                             grrected  to  rtandard condition!,

                                                  _       I volume of BloUon In which tb« foUar
                                                      dioxide aunple li contained. 100 ml.
                                                   Vi-Volume of barium perchlor»i» tltrant  oaed
                                                      tor the lample, ml  (arenfe  of replicate
                                                      Utrmttoni).
                                                  V,.-Volume of barium parehlorau Utrant  nted
                                                      for the blank, ml.
                                                   y-Dry tu meter callbrallon factor.
                                                B.03- Equi'iJent writ hi of fullur dioxide.
                                              a i   Dry eample (at Tolume,  oorrected  to
                                             condition!.
                                                                                         Tm
                                              JT,-0 «M 'frnjE Bf fcr iMtrtc nnJu.
                                                 .17.WR/ln. H« lor EndUb on
                                              M  Suitor dioxide eonotctntlon.
                                                         •Kt
                                                              (V,-V,t)
                                                                       'mtu41
                                                                                Xqattlon «-l
                                              uvi r
                                              ITi-E 03 mc/meq. far metric unlu
                                                 -7.0»lX10-« Ib/meq. lor Xotllili uniu.
                                                                     7.

                                                                       1. Atmnpherte Etnlmlora from Solfurlc Add  Mann-
                                                                     hetortnf rroma*. U.B. DHEW. PH8. Dlrlalon of Air
                                                                     Pollution   Public  Health  fterrlot  Publleatlon No.
                                                                     m-AP-13. Cincinnati, Ohio. IMi.
                                                                       J. Corbett, P. T. The Domination of SOi and 8Oi
                                                                     In Plat Oatea. Journal of th* IrutlluUof rnel.AC ZP-
                                                                     MJ. 1M1.
                                                                       J. Malty, R. E. and E. K  Dlehl. Meuurint Flue-Oai
                                                                     BOt and 9Ov POTO. 101: M-CT. NoTembrr IM7.
                                                                       4. Patton, W. p. and J. A. Brink. Jr. Nrv Equipment
                                                                     aad Tecbnlqon lor 8«jbpUnt  Chemical Proem  Gaaes
                                                                     J. Air Pollution Control-AjtociatIon 13: 182. 1963.
                                                                       V Rom. J. J. Maintenance. Calibration, and Oprntlon
                                                                     t< I«okinctie Source-Stapling E.nulpment. OfBot of
                                                                     Air  Prommi,   EnrliiMimental  Protection  Afrney.
                                                                     linircb TrUnfle Parr, N.C.  APTD-Q6?t. Marcb \vn.
                                                                       1 Hamll, H.  P.  and D. K. Camann. ColUborvIre
                                                                     Stndy of Method for the Determination of Sulfur Dloilde
                                                                     Xmteloru  (rom Stationary  Sourca (Fomll-Fuel Plred
                                                                     Blrmm Oeneralorj). EnTlronrrjental Proteerlor Afency,
                                                                     Keaearcb   Trtanxk  Park.  N.C.  I PA-&SO/4-74-034.
                                                                     D«OBmber  1973.
                                                                       7. Annual Book of A8TM Standard*. Part 31,  Watar.
                                                                     Almaphenc Analyrli. Amencan Society lor TesUai
                                                                     aud Maunali. Philadelphia. Pi. 1V74. pp. 40-U
                                                                       I. Knoll, J. E. and M. R. Midiett. The Application of
                                                                     CPA Method 6 to Hub Sulfur Dlonde Conaemnuoni.
                                                                     Enrlronmanul  Protection Afeacy. ReMarcb Tnaofle
                                                                     Park, N.C. EPA-400/t-Tt-OH. July 1978.
                                                                                                                  THERMOMETER
PROBE (END PACKED'
  WITH QUARTZ OR
    PYREX WOOL)
J*\
                                       STACK WALL
                                                                                    MIDGET IMPINGERS
                                        MIDGET BUBBLER
                                                GLASS  WOOL
                                                                                                                               SILICA GEL

                                                                                                                              DRYING  TUBE
                                                         ICE BATH


                                                   THERMOMETER
                                                                                                                 NEEDLE VALVE
                                                                                                                                  PUMP
                                             Figure 6-1.   SOj  sampling-train.
                                                                                             SURGE TANK
                                                                        11-54

-------
Mrr»oB  r—DmucDunoif  or  Nmoor*  Orn>i
       '"••OKI 7ao«  (jTinoKiiT BotradJ

1. frteapk .W ^ppli—i.ai.r

_L? -pl'iBclpl«. A n»b "unple l» collected In an ev»eo-
<•««»»» ooo t«J nine a dilute BiUuric  aci<»-bydrof«o
iwrr«» 1>M bean determined
to b» 3 M400mllllcT»mi NO, (a» NO.) per dry rtandari
«*>*      , Without harlDf to dllaU tijT—mpL.

     EE£
 J.I  B*.Tt>!'-.|  (t* rirure 7-1).  Other p»b aunpUnf
rf»Umi or equipment,  capable of measurtni sampie
volume to w4thin ±AO peraot and ooUeeUnt > sufficient
maple Torame  to allow  analytic*! reproduclblllty to
»1Uun  ±4 p«reent, wll) b» coaHderxJ acnpublt alter-
B«IT«, »ub>ct to appr»T»l of tb« Admlniivralor, U.S.
KaTUnamenUI   ProttcUoo  AjraacT. Tb«
•qolpm*ot U oaed In lampUuf:
 tl.l  Probe.  Boro*llic*l* (!&•  tabUic. luctor
M»t«a  to preTact vater corvdftoaaUoo and  vquipped
»1tb an U>-«tack or ooujt»ck OJtar to remore partlciuaU
unor  (a plu«  of  flus  wool  U »tli(actor7 fw  tail
porpoK). StAuOca iu«l or TiOoo ' tubioj ma? also be
oa»d lor the probe BaaOot U Dot  Daoaavr U th. prob*
remain* dry doriof U» pdrrinj period.
  > Uaotloii of trvl< namei or ipaeifle pradoetj d«a oo4
          aodonunant  br  th« XoTiroaa>aat*J  Pn-
      tlJ  CaUKtloe rtaak  Tvo-lltv boratlicau. roasd
     bettom (huk, with ihon ncrk and 24/40 rundard Uper
     •pnUot, protfrtrd acaiiut Implosion or broaiwe.
      1.1.3  Fluk Val'r  T-bon  iMpcoct oonoecKd  to a
     M/40 lUndjird Uptr lolnt
      1.1.4  Temprratun Oauft. Dtal-type tbermoniftcr, or
     olbfr umppniurv ptttff.  capable of Tnramrlnt  1* C
     ITT) interrals from -i to WTC (26 to I2i° F).  .
      S.1.S  Vacuum Lint Tub Ira capeblr of wltbnandinc
     » TVCUUID of 76 mm Hj (3 ID Be) abtolutt pnaiurt,  with
     *^" ooQnecuoo and T-bort itopcock.
      3.1.6  Vacuud  Oauff.  U-tub«  manometer.  1 mei«r
     (X In-), with 1-mm (0.1-ln.)  dirulou. at  olher
     • pablr of nMaiurioi prenun to  wltblD ±J.S  mni
     (8.10 in. Hjl
   '  1.1.T  Pump Capable  of  • radiating  the eoUectioo
     fluk to a PTOBUIT aqoal to or lev <^»" 75 "^^ He (3 In.
     Bt) absolute.
      2.1.8  Squfctf Bulb. Ooe-Tay.
      11.9  Volumetric Plpetu. is ml
      LI.10 Stopcock and Ground Joint Qreaw  A bifh-
     vacuum, tuin-umperatore chlorofluorccarboc  prwr li
     raqnired. HijocarbonZW6 hat b»»nfound lobe«flectl»e.
      1.1.11  Barometer. Mercury, aneroid, or other barom-
     •to- capable ot measurLnf atmcepheric pressure to wltbln
     2.5  mm Hf (0.1 In. U;). ID man> cawj. tne barometric
     ratdiof may be obtained Irorc t oca/by oaUonaJ weaibcr
     •arrice su'.ion. In which cue tbe nation value (wbJcti Ij
     the absolute barometnc prenurp) ihall be requested and
     ac  adJustmeDt for elevation  dlfTerencea betvKD tbe
     weather station and sampling point Bhall be  applied at a
     rate of minus 2.5 mm He 10.1  in. Hgj per M DI (100 ft)
     •levatioD increase, or vice  vena for elevation decrease
      2.2 £vnpl> Recovery. Tbe folloTioc  equipment b
     rwaolred for »ample recovery
      1-21  Oradu»t»d Cylinder. 40 ml with l-ml dlrUlonj.
      2JU  Sloraft  Cootalners.  Leak tne  polyetbvlene
     bottles.
                                             t.2.1  Wa«h Bottle Polv«tby)eB» or flav
                                             1.24  Ola«5 gurrirn Rod.
                                             L2.5  Ten Piper (or Indjoatlof pB. To eovar Lbe pB
                                              ute of 7 tn 14.
                                             JJ  Analviit. Tor the. anaJntj. the Mtow1n( eqolp-
                                             t-1.1  Volumetrtf PlpetM*  Two 1 ml, two 2 ml. one
                                           t ml, one 4 ml. two 10 ml. aod one 2ft ml tor each «ampl'
                                           and tuodvd

                                              U.2  Poratalo Znporadnt  Dlaba  176- to 2&0-mj
                                            •apacltf with lip for Dourto«. one foi each «ample and
                                            •acb »t»ndard. the  Coon No. 4i006 (ihallow-fonE . 194
                                            Bl) hat been feond fartor>  Xllernattvely,
                                            polyniethyl pentene bemien (Nail- No. 1203. 150 ml), or
                                            (U« beakm (150 ml) jnay be tued. Wben |lau beaken
                                            •re used, elchjni of tbe beakers may cause solid matter
                                            to be present In  tbe arfHyUcal (Uo. tbe tolldj ibould be
                                            maoved byflltrailon (Mt Section 4.3).
                                              2.^ -1  Steam Bath. Low-temperature ovens or tbermo-
                                            ataucally fontrolled bot plates kept below 70* C (1«0° T)
                                            air accepubl.1 alternatives.
                                              U 4  Dropping Pipette or Dropper. Three required
                                              2J 5  Polyethylene PoUorrnan. One for eacb aunple
                                            aod each itandard
                                              2.J 6  Or»duated CrUnder. 100ml with 1-mldivljlonj.
                                              2.3.7  Volumetric Flaskt. 50 mJ  (one foi each »anipl»).
                                            KM ml (one for each sample and earb  itandard. >nd one
                                            tar tbe workinc standard  KNOi aolutlonj, and 1000 ml
                                            (one)
                                             2.a.g  Spec&opbotoEDete?. To maaffure abaorbance at
                                           410 run.
                                             2.1.0  Graduated Plprtu 10 ml with 0.1-tnl divisions.
                                             2.1.10 Ten Paper (or IndloatirK pH  To cover iht
                                           pE rant e o( 7 to M
                                             ?J.1J  Analytical BaJaooe.  To meann U within 0.1
                                           me
                                                                                 EVACUATE
          PROBE
             \
                         PURGE
                  x_x

FLASK VALVE\   ff} SAMPLE
          r
       FILTER
GftOUND-GLASS SOCWTT.

       § NO- 12/6
                 110 nm
        STOPCCX:ilr
 T-BORE. i  PTREX.
2-mm BOR£. 8-mm OO
                                                         FLASK
                                                 FLASK SHIELD^.\
                                                                         SQUEEZE BULB


                                                                      IMP VALVE

                                                                               PUMP
                                                                           THERMOMETER
                               CONE
             GROUND-GLASS
              STANDARD TAPER.

                SLEEVE NO. 24/40
                                                                      210 mm
GftOUND-GLASS
SOCKET. § NO.  U/5
PYREX
                                                                                                                •FOAM ENCASEMENT
                                                                                                       BOILING FLASK •
                                                                                                       2-LITER. ROUND-BOTTOM.  SHORT NECK.
                                                                                                       WITH | SLEEVE. NO. 24/40
                                     Figure 7-1.  Sampling  train, flask valve, and flask.
                                                                         11-55

-------
   Unless otherwts*  Indicated. It Is Intended that all
 nejfnu conforni to tbe specifications established by the
 Committee on  Analytical Raajentj  of  tbe  American
 Chemical  Society, where such specifications  are avail
 able, otherm-tie. use the b»l ivallablf (rede.
   1*1  Sampling  To prepare tbr absorbing solution,
 •aotlously add 2.S ml concentrated HiSO. d 1 liter of
 waloniied,  distilled  water.  Mil well and  add  « ml of I
 percent  hydrogen peroxld'. freshly prepared  from K
 parent  hydrogen  peroildc  solution   The  absorbing
 solution ibould bf u»Ki wiihln 1 »'eek of lu preparation.
 Do not eipose u> extreme heat or dirert sunlight
   t-2  Bamplr Recovery. Two raag&nu are raqulnd fat
 avmple recovery:
   ail  Scaium Hydroxide ON). DKeoIvs 40 g NaOH
 IB delotuaea, distilled water and cSluu to  1 liter
   aJ.2  Wiier Delonlaed. distilled to conform u AETM
 ayaclDeatloo  OU0-74.  Type  i. At tbe  option ol the

 analyst. th«  rXNO. U*t for  oxldiiable orraolc matur
 nay be aalru>d when tilth eoDccntraUotu of er|*alc
 matte are not upecttd U> be praenl.
   1.3  Aoalysii. for the aoalyus, tbe  following raafenu
 an  raquired
   HI  Fumlnf BtiUuric Acid. IS to 18 percent by w«l|ht
 Cnr sulfur  trionde  HANDLE  WITH CAUTION.
   14.3  Phenol Whiu Kbd
   14.J  Bulrunc Acid  Concentrated.  V> percent mini.
 •ma assay.  HANDLE WITH CAUTION.
   » J 4  Potassium Nitrate Dned at  IDS to 110° C (T3C
 U 230C F) for t minimum of 2 hours lust prior u prepart
 tton of nandard solution.
   1-J.5  Standard KNOi  Bolutloo   Ditsoln  aiactly
 L196 ( of dried potassium nitrate (KNOi) in  deionited.
 diitllle^  Tater and  dilute to 1 liter with  deiomud.
 diibllL^ -rater in a 1,000-ail Tolumeirie flask
   1.S8  Wortinz Staodard ENOi Solution  Dilate 10
 •H  of w t standard  solution  to 100 mJ with  deioniud
 dlstilW ir»tei  One mllliliter of the wortiot ilandard
 •oluuon U equivalent to 100 «f nitrogen dloiide  (N Oil
   1.3.7  Water.  Deionited, distilled as to Section J.:.:
   »  JJ  Phenoldi5Ulforuc Acid Solution.  Dissolve U  |
 af pure wait* phenol In 150 ml concentrated  suUuric
 add on a neam bath  Cool,  add 75 ml fuminc sulfuric
 •eld, aod beat at 100° C (217° F) for 2 boon Sure In
 • dart, stoppered botUe.

 4. Pnctdura

   4.1  Sampling.
   4.1.1   Pipette 25 ml of absorbing solution Into a aimple
 flask, retaining • sufficient quantity for ii» in  prepartnf
 tbe  calibration standards  Insert tbe flask rllrf stopper
 mto tbe flask witb the TaJre In the "purfe" position
 Assemble tbe aimpltnc  train as shovri  In Figure 7'1
 and place the probe at the sampling  point Ualcf  sure
 that all ntunrs are ti(bt and leak-free, and  thai  all
 (round flas Jcinu  have been properly freased with a
 klth-raruum,   hlth-lernperature   chlorofliiorocarbon-
       ttopcock  (reax  Turn -tbe fiask  nlve and tbe
 Pomp nice to  their "•nruatr" positions  TTacuate
 the flask to 75 mm Hj  (3 in  HI) absolute pnsurf. or
 laav  £racuation to a praaurt  apprriarhinc  the  Tapor
 pr«sure of water at tbe ousting temperature is desirable
 Turn the pump ralve to Its "vent" position and turn
 aC th« pump  Check  for latkatr by obMrrint tbe ma-
 aoouUr  far aoy prusure  fluctuation  (**y Taruti^n
  greater  than 10 mm R|  (0.4 lo Hi) orar  a p&nod of
  1 minute U not araeptab^,  and the  fla and-nlve (V/), the nask Umpenture (T,),
  and the barometric pressure   Turn the  flask  -ralte
  ooonterdockwue  to  Its "purge" position and  do the
  aame  with the  pump ralve. Purre the probe and tbe
  Tteuum tube uslnc tbe aqueete bulb  If conderuation
 occurs In the probe and the  flask valve area, beat the
 probe and purfe until tbe  condensation disappears
 Nart, turn tbe pump »al»e to lu "tent" position  Turn
 tbe nask rvl^f dottrrue to lu "eTaruate  position and
 record the difference in the mercury levels in tbe znanoro-
 •ter. Tbe  absolute internal pressure In the flask (P.)
 b equal  to tbe barometric pre&sure leis tbe manometer
 readlni  Ircmedialely turn tbe flask valve to tb< "aam-
 ple" position and prmit the (as to enter the flask until
 pressures in the  fla
  • oiide (1 N), dropwue (about 25 to IS drops) Check the pH by dipping a •tlrrinx rod into the aolutlon and then touching tbe rod to the pR t&st paper. Ramove as Uttle maurlal as possible tfurlnf this tup Uark the height of the liquid level K that tbe container can be checked for leakage after traojpon Label the container to clearly Identify lu contents Seal tbe container for ihlpptcg 4J Analrsls Note the level of tbe liquid In container acd confirm vbether or not any aample was loel during afclpment; note this on the analytical data sheet. II a noticeable amount of leakagr has occurred, either void tbe sample or use methods, »un)ect to tbe approval of tbe Administrator, to correct tbe final mulls. Immedi- ately prior to analysis, transfer the contents of tbe ablpping container to a £O-ml volumetric flask, and rinae tbe container twice with 4-ml portions of deionittd, distuied water. Add tbe rime water to tbe flask and dilute to tbe mark with deionited. distilled water; mil thoroughly. Pipette • ZVmJ aliquot into tbe procelaln mporating dish. Return any unused portion of the •ample to the polyethylene itorafe bottle Evaporate the 25>ml aliquot to dryneas on a tuaro bath and allow to aool Add 2 ml pheooldisulfooic acid aolution lo the dried residue and tnturale thoroughly with a povlethyl- ao« policeman. Make lure the solution contacts all the racdut. Add. 1 ml deionited. distilled water and four drops of concentrated sulfunc acid. Heat the aolution oc a rteam batb for 3 minutes with occasional stirrtni Allow the solution to cool, add X ml deiotuud. distilled water, mil well by nirring, and add concentrated am- Booium bydroriae, dropwise, with constant itlrrtng, ontil the pH U 10 (at determined by pH paper). If the aample contains aolids, these musl be ramoved by nhnrjoo (centnfugation U an acceptable alternative, •object to the approval of tbe Administrator), as follows filter through Whatman No. 41 filter paper Into a 10t>ml volumetric flask, nnv the evaporating dish with three *-m) portions of deioaited, distilled water, filter these three rinses. Wafh the filter with at least three IVml portions of deionited. distilled water Add the filter washing! to the contents of the volumetric flask and dilute to the mark with deionited, distilled water. If •olids are absent, tbe solution can be transferred directly to tbe 100.ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark wiib deionited. distilled water. XUj the contents of the Balk thoroughly and measure tbe abaorbance at the optimum wavelength ua*d for tbe standards (Section 5.2. 1), using the blank solution as a ttro reference. Dilute the sample and the blank with equal volumes of dcion- laed, distilled water If the absorbance exceeds /C. the abaorbance of tbe 400 *« N Oi nandard (aee Section i-2-2) . 11 Flask Volume Tbe volume of the collection flasl- •aak valve combination musl be known prior v> aun- pling Aatemble tbe flask and flask valve and fill will water, lo the tlopoock Measure the volume of water to ±10 ml Record this volume on tbe flask. 1.2 Speclropbolometcr Calibration. ft.2.1 Optimum Wavelength Determination. For both fised and variable wavelength ipectrophotoiDeters. calibrate against standard certified wavelength of 410 nm. every 8 months Alternatively, for variable wave length tpeclropbotomeirrs. aran the ipectrum between 400 and 412 nm using a 20Ti *g NOi standard aolution (aee Section 4.J.2). If a peak does not occur, tbe ipectropho- tomeler ls probably malfunctioning, and should be re- paired. When a peak Is obtained within the 400 to 416 nm nuige, the w»7elen?th at which this peak occurs shall be the optimum wavelength for the measurement ot ab- sorbance for both the standards and samples. 12.2 Determination of Ep-ctrophotomelei Callbn Bon Factor K,. Add 0.0. 1.0. 2.0, J.O. aod 4.0 ml of tbe ENOi working standard solution (I ml -100 «t NOi) to • aeries of five porcelain evaporating dishes. To each, add M ml ft/ absorbing notation. 10 ml deionited, distilled water, and sodium bydroiide (IN), dropwise, until the pB Is belween t and 12 (about~2S to 15 drops each) BepinninK with the evaporation step, follow the analy- sis procedure of Section 4.S. until the lolution has be»n fransfexred to the 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted lo tbe mark Measure the absorbancr of «ec b solu lion . at the optimum wtvtlength, as determined In Section >2.1. This calibration procedure must be repeated on each day that samples ar» analy ted Calculate the spectrophotom- eler calibraUon factor as follow]. K ion i ' w ' Equation 7-1 wfeart: JT. -Call bradoB factor Xi-Absorbance of the lOO-* NOi ttaadard Xi-Abwrbance of the 200-)« NOi itandard X^Absorbanceoftht KOvC NOi itandard X.-AUorbance of the 400-ng NOi standard i.l Barometer. Callbrau acalnst a mercury barom- eter. »4 Tamperature Oaugr Calibrate dial thermam< -er» ajaJrul mercury-ia-f taat thensomeun. 11-56 ».S Veemini Oeugr Calibrate mechanical gauges, II oaed, against t mercury manometer web M that speci- fied lo 2.1.«. 4.8 Analytical Balance. Calibrate against itandard •alfbts. Carry rat thf calculations. retaining it least onr ertra decimal figure beyond tbti of tb« acquired data. Round 00 figures after fin*] calculations. e.1 Nomenclature , X-AbMrbanc" of sample C"Concentra'iorfOf NO( as HOi, dry basis. cor- net^ to standard conditions, ing/djcm (Ib/dscf) /••Dilution factor (I e., B/i, 2110, etc., required only II serDplfdllullon vas needed to redoce the absorbanre^lnio thf rarne of calibration) Jif, — 8p*rtropholomeier calibration factor • •Hiss of NO, as NOi In (as sample. »t /•/"Final absolute pressure of flask. mm Hf (in HI) ^-Initial absolute pressure of flask, mm Hi (In He) /•«<- Standard ibeolotf pnawre, 780 ram Hg (29 97 in He) TV-Final absolute temperature of flask ,'K PR) Ti- Initial absolute temperature o( flask °K <°R). r.u- Standard absolute temperature. 293° E (128* R) t'.,- Sample volume at ilandard conditions (dry basis). ml V/»Volume or flask and Wve. ml Vt«Volume of absorbing solution. 26 ml 2-60 24 the auquol factor. (If other than a 2&-inl eliouol wa* used for analysi-, Ibf correspond- Ins factor roust he substituted) t.2 Sample volume, dry bajis, corrected to ctandard conditions where- A", = 0.3858 -17.W °K mm Hg •R Equation 7-2 for metric units in. Hg 6.1 Total ft NOi per ample. for English units Equation 7-3 HoTX.—Mother than a 24-ml aliquot is used for enely- ali, tbe factor 2 must be replaced by a oorrMponding tector. 1.4 Sample concentration, Arj bull, eometed to standard conditions. C-K, Equation 7-4 ,-IV —8/^ for metric unite jig/ml -6.243X10- for English units 7. 1. Standard Methods of Chemical Analysis. 6th ad Naw York, D. Vna Nostraad Co., Inc. 1862. Vol. 1, p. I2»-330. 1. Standard Method of Test for Oildes of Nitrogen In Gaseous Combustion Products (PhenoidisuUonic Arid Procedure). In. 196S Book of ASTM Standards, PartSC Philadelphia, Pa. 1S«. ASTM Designation D-1W6-M. p. Tli-72«. 1. Jacob, U. B. Tbe Chemical Analysis of Air Pollut- ants. New York. Lnlenclence Publishers, Inc. I960. Vol. 10, p. 151-156. 4. Beany, R. L-, L. B, Berger, and H. H. Schrenk. Determination of Oildes of Nltrof f n by tbe Phenoldusul- (onlc Acid Method Bureau of Mines, U.S. Dept. of Interior. R. I. J6S7. February W3. ». Hamll. H. F. and D. K. Camann. Collaborative Btudy of Method for the Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Fossil Fuel- Tired Steam Generators). Southwest Research Institute report for Environmental Protection Agency. Research Triangle Park. N.C. October i, 1S73. «. Hamll. H. F. and R. E. Thomas. Collaborative Btudy of Method for the Dnermlnation of Nitrogen Oxide Emission* from Stationary Sources (Nitric Acid Plants). Southwest Research Institute report lor En- vironmental Protection Agrocv. Research Triangle Park. N.C. May a. 1»74.

  • -------
    MlTHOD  »— DtTHMIMiTIOh  Of BTJUTUC  AOD  Mill
      AND SuLnil DlOIlDl IHUBIOMI TICK 8tiT10Ni«T
      &OUICU
    
    I. Principle «
      1.1  Piiucipir A ;u sample- 11 titrated boklne/ltolly
    IroiE ihe >iaci.. The sulfunc acid mist (Including nillur
    trioiidc) and the sulfur diotide ire separated. mil boib
    tractioru are measured separately by lb« bariiuu-lhano.
    Utntion method.
      1.2  Applicability. This method is applicable. (or tbe
    determination  ol sulfuric acid  nuit  (indudJnf niltur
    trtoncje, and in th< absence, of other paniculate matter)
    and  sulfur diotlde emissions Irom stationary  sourne *
    Cotlaborvtvt  tests  have shown that  the minimum
    delectable hyiiu of thf meihcxj are 0 OS miluimmvcubK
    meter  (003> 10-' noundvcubic  toot)  (or lullur irloiid*
    »nd  l.J mt/ti^ (0.74   10-' ll> ll'l tor sullur dioildt. No
    upprr limiu-h«»« b«n fl»bli-hod  Ui»d on ihcorttlcal
    calcuUnoru lur 'AX) miUilncrs  ol  3 percent  hydrocca
    ptroude  «o^uion,  th« upper  concenmtion  limit  lor
    lullur dicnde HI >  1 u m' (36 1 (t>) (u iunple u tboul
    1J.400  mr'm' (7.7X10-1 llrlii). The upper  limit c»n be
    eitf ndf d by MicrfSdinc th« iiu«ntily a/ pvroiide solulioc
    to trie impu^en.
      Possiblf intcrfvnnc t(ents of this method ir« fluondu,
    free  fcmmomt.  ftnd  dimethyl  tniUne. If tny of  th»e
    interfering »^pi.i.3 ire prfsrnt (this cmn be determined by
    knowledge of the process), tlterriAliTe  methods, subject
    to  the. approve ot the  AdoiliUitrtiw, wt required.
       Filler.ble ptnlcuUte matter nur r« determined tlnitt
     with SOi >nd 30t Uublei't lo Ihe ippro»il ol the Aa-
     nJnliinttor): hovever, toe procedure tued lor purlculAU
     Butter must be coiuintnt  with the ipnlArt>Uoni uid
     procedures fl»eD In Utlhod 5
       2.1  Sampllnf.  A ichem«Uc of the  suopUnf  mln
     turd la this m.'thod li ihovn In Tiriire S-l. It 13 ilmjuu
     to the Method  5 Irnlti cirrpt that the. fllier rx^lQon  b
     dUforenl tnd Ihe niter holdi T da-5  not have lo be hulexi.
     Comrnprrlal ni^Jels of this train are available  For tboae.
     who desire lo build their own. however, complete, con-
    ' Itrtli'llon drlallj a/r Ji-krllx-O In  A1'T[)A>I  Chanid
     from the AI'TU^i'iHI  dmunifnt  inj allowAl-U* modi-
     Acailoiu  to Fliiurt  I- 1 art  dixutonl In the followlnf
      'i U  Pilot Tube  Sane ai Method S. SocUon 2.1.3.
    
      11.4  Dlfl«r»nU«l Prtssiart 0«nf S»n>« M M el bod 8.
       Tlir  orjernlhif  and  maintenance  procrdurej  for lh«
     iuii|illn( train uu«r la lni(Kjrtant In  obliUidnK valid results, ait  user*
     ihouM ii-ud Ihu ArTP4r,7« ilwurr., in and adupl Ibe
     opcrailnit and mainiriuincr pruL'i-Uurcs outlined In It,
     unless  otlierwlb^ s^'rified hcri-in Funhu JeLalb  and
     ruhlrllnr^ on OIMTUIIOII And  niainli'nance arc riven In
     M-thod 5 and should  ta read  and  lolluwrd  whenever
     they aru ap|)lirahle.
       ; 1 1   ProU Nuulc. Same as Method i. Section 3.1.1.
       2 I..1   l'rolM^ l^nrr. UoroaJllcklrt or i|uanj f lax>, vllh a
     heatlnjt syslcro to iirevtnt vl»ll>lf cond**iu*uon durtn(
     smmpUng. Do not uae mclai probe linen.
                 Holdsr  Boro«lllc«l» flrna, »lth » «la*
    bit tUter support and  a illlcone  rubber (islet  Otber
    •wket mat/ilals, «.«., Teflon or Vlton, may be n»d iub-
    tl t« the appro»al of the Admlnlsu»tor. The  holder
    Stilt) iball proTlda a po>IU» a-al acalnit leataie from
    tbe ouulde or wound  In Tliuir t-\. The
    tnt and third ihall be-of  tbe OrMnhurt-Smlih rlealfn
    with lundftrd Upi  Ta» ncond and fourth in»U be. of
    (be Or»enban-8mlth dWl^n, modlAed by replarlni  the
    Insert with an approilmately  II mllllmeier (OJ IrL) ID
    flaw lube harlnt an uncorurlrlried  tip  located 13 mm
    (O.S In ) from the, bottom ol the fuul Similar collection
    ryvtema,  which oa^« b«en approved by the Adjulolj.
    trator. nur be wed
      J 1.7  Wetenoi BrrUm.  Same  u Metbcx] i. Section
    tl.t.
      1.1 i   Barometer.  Same M Method i Section 3.1.9.
      US   Oa.< Density Dettrmloalloo  Equipment. Bane
    M Method 5. Bwtlon 2.1.10.
      1.1.10   Te,mp«r«turt Oauce. Thermometer or «qulT»-
    ktnt, to met.uLr« tbe lemperaturf o< Uie f u icarlnc  tbe
    iBploter tnJn to wlthlc 1* C (7 T}.
      1.2  temple Recovery.
        PROBE
                      7
         REVERSE  TYPE
           PITOT TUBE
                                      TEMPERATURE SENSOR
                                                      PROBE
                                HTOTTUBE
    
                                TEMPERATURE SENSOR
                                                                                                                         THERMOMETtR
                                                                                  FILTER HOLDER
                                                                                    ,CHECK
                                                                                     VALVE
                                                                             ICE BATH             IMPINGERS
    
    
                                                                                     BY-PASS VAWt
                                                                                                                                               VACUUM
                                                                                                                                                 LINE
                                                                                                                                          VACUUM
                                                                                                                                            GAUGE
                                                                                                                             MAIN VALVE
                                              DRY TEST METER
    
                                                      Figure 8-1.  Sulfuric acid mist sampling train.
                                                                                 11-57
    

    -------
      Nor*.—II moisture oooUol Is Vc b« determined by
    Imping tr analysis, weigh tech of the Am three Implnfcn
    (plus absorblngsolutlon) to the nearest 0.5 | and record
    these weights. The weight of the silica col (or silica gel
    plus container) mult also be determined U> U» merest
    0_i | »au iwoixled.
      4.1.4   Pretest  Leek-Check  Procedure.  Fallow the
    basic procedure  outlined In  Method 6. Section 4.1.4.1.
    noting  that  th*  probe heater shell be adjusted  to the
    •ninlnvir" temperature required  to  prevent  condensa-
    tion, end also lh»t verbege >uch as.	pliurmi to*
    Inlet to  toe  Alter bolder • • V  shell be replaced by,
    "• • • plugtlng  the Inlet to the  first Impinger • • V"
    Tfce pretest leal-check is optional.
      4.1J   Trelrr^OpentloD. Follow the basic procedures
    eotlioed In Method 5. Section 4.1-5, In oorUunction with
    UM sallowing special Instructions. Data shell be raeorded
    •a a sbeet similar Co lb« one In Tigurs *-l- The sampling
    rale shall not noted 0.090 m'/mln (1.0 ctm) during the
    ran. Periodically during  th« test, observe toe coor»ecting
    Una  between The probe  end Ant Implnger foe signs at
    condensation. If It does  occur. adjust  the probe bun*
    •siting  upward to the minimum temperature required
    to prevent condensation. If component changes become
    Maeaary  durlni > run,  e leak-check shell bt done Im-
    mediately before each change, According to the procedure
    outlined In Section 4.1.4J of Method 5 (with appropriate
    BodtAcalloos. u mentioned la  Section 4.1.4 of tali
    method);  record ill  leek  rales.  If  the  leakage  rele<»)
    exceed the specified rate, tbt tester thill  either Told the
    ran or  shell plan to correct the sample volume u out-
    lined in  Section 83 ol Method 5. Immediately after com-
    ponent  changes, leek-checks  an  optional.  U  then
    leak-check) an done, the procedure outlined  la Section
    4.1.4.1 of  Method 5  (with  appropriate  modifications)
    •ball be  used.
    
      AAer  turning  off the  pomp aod  recording the final
    readings at the conclusion of  each  ran, remove the probe
    from the stack.  Conduct t pott-test (mandatory) leak-
    check BJ ir. Section 4.1.4.3 of Method 5 (with appropriate
    modification) and record the leak rate. If the post-test
    leakage rate  eiceeds the specified acceptable rate, the
    tester shall either correct the sample volume, as outlined
    la Section 6 J of Method 5. or shall void the run.
      Drain the ice bath and. with the probe disconnected.
    purge the remaining  part of the train, by drawing clean
    ambient air through the system for  li minutes at the
    average flow rate used for sampUng.
      NOTI—Clean ambient air can be provided  by pesstns;
    air through  a charcoal Alter. At the optioa of the tester,
    mmbient air (without cleaning) may be used.
      4.1.t  Calculation  of Percent Isotinetic.  Follow the
    procedure outlined in Method 5, Section 4.1.8.
      4-2 Sample Recovery.
      4-1.1  Container No. 1. If  a moisture content analysli
    to to be done, weigh  the first uopinfcr plot cooUnti to
    toe oeamt 0.51 and record thii weight.
      Trauler the contents of the Ant implncer to a ISO-mi
    graduated cylinder. Rinse the probe. Ant Implnger, all
    oonnecting glassware before the Alter, and the front bal/
    of the Alter oolder with 80 perc«nt lsoprope.iol. Add the
    ruue solution to the  cylinder.  Dilute to  250 ml with M
    percent isopropanol. Add the Alter to the aolutlon, mix,
    and transfer to the storage container. Protect the solution
    a«aln*i  evaporation. Mark  the level  of liquid on  bet
    container and identirv the sample container.
      4-2.3  Container No. 2. II a moisture content analyau
    to to be done, weigh tb« second and third  impingen
    (plui contents)  to the nearest OJ, g and record these
    weighu. Also, weigh the spent itllca (el (or silica gel
    plus implnger) to the nearest 0.5 g.
      Traas/er the  solution! from the second  aod third
    impingers to •  1000-mJ  graduated crllnder.  Rirue all
    aaanecUAg glasfware  (Including back half of Alter holder)
    between the Alter aod silica gel implnger with delonlred,
    distilled water, and add this rinse water to the erllMer.
    Dlluu  to t  volume of 1000 ml with delonlied, distilled
    water  Transfer the solution to i ttoragt container. Mark
    the level of liquid on  the container. Seal and Identify tb«
     ample container.
      4J  A
           Analyiii.
      Note the level of liquid In containers 1 and 2, aad eoo-
     fina whether or not any sample  wu lost during ship-
     Bent;  note this on the analytical diu sbect. If a notice-
     able amount of leakage has occurred, eitHer void UM
     sample or use methods, subject to the approval of the
     Administrator, to correct the Anal results.
      4-1.1  Container No. 1.  Shake the container boldlnf
     tbe  Isopropanot solution  and the  Alter.  If  the  Alter
     breaks up, allow the fragments to settle lor a few minutes
     beXon removing a sample. Pipette  a 100-mJ aliquot of
     this solution into a 2SC-ml Erlenmeyer flaak. add J to 4
     drops of thortn Indicator, and UtraU lo a plxu\ end point
     using 0.0100 N barium perchlorale. Repeat the tltratlon
     with • second aliquot c/sample and average the tlcraUoo
    
     T*inJ*- KepUcaU atrslions mart agree within I parent
     sj-OJ ml, whichever Is greater.
      4JJ   Container No. 2. TborooghJy mil the ntattoc
    KB the container holding  the contents of the seeood aod
    third tmpiogen. Pipette s 10-ml allqoot of sample into s
    tSO-mJ  Erleooieyv cul. Add ml of laopropanol. 2  to
    4 drops of thorin Indicator, and titrate t« a pint eodpoint
     •Log 0.0100 N barium psrebJcrete. Repeat the trtratioo
     wtti a seoocd aliquol of sample aod avenge the UtreOon
     YtjuM Replicate titrstioos moat afret within 1 peroeot
     «r U ml, whichever Is greater.
       4JJ  Blanks.  Prepare blanks by adding 2 to 4 drops
     •* thorin Indicetor to 100 ml of H percent tsopropanol.
     TBrate the blanks In tee sam« manner u the sample*
    
    
       (.1  Calibrate  equipment using the procedures spec)-
     led In the  lollowing sections of Method I  Section 6J
     CPMtedog ryrum); Section  U  (temperature ranges),
     •eetlon  1.7 (barometer).  Note that lie recommended
    ' leak -check of the metering symtrn, described in Section
     iJ of Method i, also applies to this method.
       U  Standardise  the barium perchlorale solution vrith
     V ml of standard tuliurlc acid, to which 100 ml of 100
          at leopropenol has bean added.
      Note.—Carry oat  aakalatloai retaining at kut OB*
     ntr» decimal fig-tin  beyond that of the acquired  data.
     Boond ofl ogiirera/ter final calculation.
      (J  Nomenclature.
           X.-Crosa-seetlooal area of nctilt, m> (ft').
           JB^^Water vapor In the gas stream,  proportion
                 by volume
       CHsSOt-Bumirk  acid (Indoding SOi) eoeeeBtntloc,
                 l/dscm Ob/dscf).
         CSOi'Sulfor dioxide oonoentrattoo, g/dscm  (IV
                 dsc/1.
             7-Percent of IsokineOc sampling.
            rV-NormalitT of barium parchlorate titrant, g
                 •qulvalents/llter.
         n»t~Barometric prMSurt at the sampling site,
                 mm Bg (In. Eg).
            P.-Absolute stack gaa pressnrt, mm Hg da.
                 Bg).
          ''•td-Btandard absolute pnswra, TV mm Etg
                 (29.92m. Eg).
           T«-Avaraf e  abeomte dry ras meter temperature
                 (•eeTlfure 8-2). • K  (• R).
            r.ojlvarage  absolute ctack (as t&mparaton (sse
                 Figure S-2), • K  f B).
          T^td" Standard  absolate  Umperatun,  fff  I
                 (42T E).
            V.»Volome  of sample allqaot  titrated, 100 ml
                 tar BiSO, and 10 ml for SO:.
           Vi.-Total volume of liould ooUecled In tmptngen
                 and silica gel. ml.
           V*mVolume  of gas sample  as unsimiisil  by dry
                                                           «ns»U the moartun conteat of the pptMi to this method. Note that U the affluent rei
                                                                  can be considered dry, the volume of water vapor
                                                             ad moisture content need not be calculated.
                                                             e-6  BuUurtc acid mist (including SOi) concentration.
                                                                   _         _
                                                                  Cm,»0," AI
                                                                                                 V.
                                                                                                   t
                                                                                              Equation  8-2
                                                             JC.-0.049CX (AnUIiaqul-ralmt tor metric units
                                                               -l.oeixio-'lb/miq lor English units.
                                                                 Sulfur dioxide concentration.
                                                                                              Equation 8-3
                                                             jr;, -0.02303 r/meq (or metric onlta.
                                                                -7.061 xlO-Mb/ineq for Inflish tmrts.
                                                             C.7  IsokJoetic Variation.
                                                             a.7.1  Cakoiation from raw data.
    
                                                           j   100 T.IK, V..+ ( V,/T,) P>., + AH/13.6)]
                                                                                              Equation 8-4
    
                                                           where:
                                                             Xi-0.0034«4 ma Hg-m'/ml-'a" lor metric nnlts.
                                                               -O.OCO676 In. Hf-h'/mJ-'E lor Zngliih tmlu.
                                                             «.7J  Calculation tram InUrmedlaU nines.
                          T V
    
               ~K>  P.».A*i(l-B..)
    
                                       EquAtion 8-5
    
      Xi-4^aO lor metric tmlts.
         -O.OWiO for English units.
      (4  Acceptable  Resuru. U 90 percent  « tester i&alj tltbw correct the value of t'. (n Equation
    *-l  (ei described  In Section U el Method i), or shall
    Invalidate the test run.
    
    
      M Volume of Water  Vapor and  Jtourcun Content.
     CeJeniaU the  volume of water  vapor using Equation
     t-i oT Method 4: the weight  of water collected In  the
      J? ?**" *"d *llc*  (el can  be  dlrectlv  eooTerted to
     mmiUten (the sped He parity of water  is 1  i/ml). Cal-
                                                             1. Atmospheric Zmisriou from  SuUuric Acid  Manu-
                                                           •asturlng rnxusats.  D.B.  DEEW,  PBS.  Division  of
                                                           Air Palfution. Public Health Serrlc*  PnbueaUon No.
                                                           HV-AP-13. Cincinnati. Ohio. 19*i.
                                                             1. Corbett,  P. T. The Determination of SOi and BO,
                                                           m riue OSMS. Journal ol th« Institute of fuel. 14.-237-M9.
                                                           im.
                                                             t. Martin, Robert M  Construrtioti Details of Isokrinetic
                                                           Soorc* Sampling Equipment. Environmental Protection
                                                           Agency. Research  Triangle Park, N.C.  AH  Pollution
                                                           Control Office Publication No. APTD-QM1. April, 1971.
                                                             4. Panon, W. T. and 1. A. Briak, Jr. New Equipment
                                                           sod Techniques for Sampling Chemical Process  Oases
                                                           Journal of Air  Pollution Control Association. IS  142.1963
                                                             6. Rom, J. J. Maintenance Calibration, and Operation
                                                           «°  Isotloetlc  Source-Sampling  Equipment  Office  of
                                                           Jalr Programs,   Environmental  Protection  Agency.
                                                           lavearch Triangle Park, N.C. APTD-OS74. March, 1«72.
                                                            «. Hamil. H.  T.  and D.  I.  Camaan.  Collaborative
                                                           Study of Method lor  Determination of Sulfur Dloude
                                                           Emissions from Stationary  Sources  (7osall fuel-Fired
                                                           Steam Oen&raton). Environmental Protection Agency.
                                                           sUaeareh  Triangle  Park,  N.C.   EPA-450/4-74-034.
                                                           Dioember, 1973.
                                                            7. Annual Book of A8TU Standards. Fart II:  Water.
                                                           Atmospheric  Analysis pp  40-42.  American Society
                                                           lor Tasting and Matartais. Philadelphia, Pa. 1974.
                                                                                   11-58
    

    -------
            Wath  BctUa*. PolyiUrteae « |La»,  too ml.
    
       Sow)
    1.9  Analyst.
    
                                     oom*ot »n»Jysii !
      2.1.4  Ortduaud Cylinder. 100 ml.
                                       , to
    
                      Botik.  To *dit, Ihf KMnO, ust lor  ozldiimble orimlc mitwj
    »•) b« omltud »hen  bltb  ocmoenL-aLloni o(  omoJc
    •wtur in not eipectnj to tw  prannt.
       t.1.4  topropanal. K Parant. Mil wn ml of laopro-
     »uo! with *» ml ofdeionlted, distilled rater.
       NoTI.—Experience has abovn that only A.C.8. trade
     hepropanol  Is  ftatlafartory   Tests b»»e shown  that
     laopropaool  obtained  from  oomjnerrjaj sources occav
     eauloDally has peroilds Imparities tbal will csuiat ej.
    
                                 ptroildts In aach lot  cJ
                 Shake 10 ml of toe Isopropenol with 10 ml
      f freshly prepared 10 percent potassium  loUlde aolatloo.
     rnpare a bUrU by similarly  trutlnf 10 ml of distilled
     water. After 1 minute, read the ftbaorbanc* on ft spectro-
     pbotometer ftt &S2 naoocneten. II the absorba^ce eiceeds
    '0.1. the Isopropanol iball not be used  Paroiides may be
     removed from laopropanol by  redl5tilltnx. or by pajeege
     Uvouch a column of actlTst>d alumina  Bovever. r*>
     •(ant-ffrade Isopropanol vlth suitably low perollde levels
     li reaullly ftrallabre from oonunercial sources; tbereJon,
     r%>«rUon of  eoDtamlnated lots  may  be more emcleot
     than loUowlrut the peroilde rtrooTal procedure.
       Hi  Byorofpn Fvotide  I Perrrnt. DUate  100 ml
     •I to peircent hydrogen peroxide to 1 Ut«r Tlth datoalsMd,
     dlcUlled vaLer. Prepan fnah dally.
       I.I »  Craabedlce.
       1.3  Sample RerOTrry.
       U.I  Water. Same al S.t.l.
       1.3.2  Isopropanol, 10 Percent. B*>me u 1.1.4.
       1.1  Analysts.
       U.I  Water. Same all.1.9.
       112  laopropanol. 100 Peretrjl.
       1.1.3  Thortn Indicator l-(o-ano  l§opTt)f»r«ol. 1.22 | of bulum ehlorlrtf dJhrdrmte
    (BftTIf SH rO) m»y b» o»«J lrul«d of the b»r1nm p»r-
    «tlk>nl> BlAndftrdlM vKJ> •aUurlc ftcld M In ftocUon 5.2
    Thli  io)utkxi mut t» preuoud tnjait mponUon  >t
    rnllUma
      1.3 5  Sulfurtc  Acid 8it/id*nj (00100 N)  Purrhve or
    itandtrdlu to ±0 9XC  N ftfunjl 00100 N  NiOH thftt
    hM   prrTiotuly  been -itandftrdiud  ftc&init primary
    itandird pouoluni acid phthaUu.
    
    4. Procedure
      4.1  SunpUnt
      4.1.1  Pruest Preparation. Folio* the procerfun out-
    lined  in Mflhod  i, f—Hion 4.1 1.  nilrn  should  be In-
    •pfcied. but nr*d not b» dMiccaipd «fi(hed, or Identl-
    lird. Iflhefffluentfasranbe coruidfriNd dry , I.e., mois-
    ture free, the silica |fl n"d not be weighrd
      4.1.2  Prelimmar) H'lfrminalionj  Folio* tb« pro-
    CTdure outlined in Mclhod 5, S^cnon 4 1.2.
      4.1.3  Preparation of Tollecuon Tnln Follow the pro-
    cedure outlined  in  Mel hod 5. S«riinn 4 I 3  (eifept for
    the tecood paragraph  and other obTiouiiy mapplicabte
    p»n«) and u» Fifure 8-1 instead of Fiirure S-l Replace
    the aecond partfraph  «1lb  Place 100 ml of 80 percent
    toopropanol in the ftnt  Impin^er.  100 ml of 3 percent
    bydxocen peroxide in  both  the  second  and trurd Im-
    pln^en,  relAlo ft  portion of each rtefeot for uae  M ft
    blank solution. Placx about KOI of atlioa [tl In tb« k>ont>
       K.ANT.
       LOCATION.
    
       OMRATOR.
    
       DATE	
    
       MUM NO. _
       SAMPLE SOX NO..
    
       METER »OXNO._
    
       METER 4Hf	
    
       CFACTOR	
      «TOTTUBE COEFFICIENT,^.
                                                                                           STATIC PRESSURE. •• H| (•. H|)
    
                                                                                           AMBIENT TEMPERATURE	
    
                                                                                           BAROMETRIC PRESSURE	
    
                                                                                           ASUMEO MOISTURE,*	
    
                                                                                           PROBE LENGTH. m|h)	
                                                    SCHEMATIC Of STACK CROSS SECTION
                                                                                           NOZZLE IDENTIFICATION NO	
    
                                                                                           AVERAGE CALIBRATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, on(mj.
    
                                                                                           PROBE HEATER SETTING	
    
                                                                                           LEAK RATE. m3/mi«,(cfm)	
    
                                                                                           PROBE LINER MATERIAL	
    
                                                                                           FILTERED.  	
    TRAVERSE POINT
    NUMSEF.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TOTAL
    SAMPUXC
    TIME
    («), mia.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    AVERAGE
    VACUUM
    ••H|
    0».Hi)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    HACK
    TEMPERATURE
    (Tsl,
    •C(»F)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    VELOCtTY
    MEAD
    (APj),
    a«rl;0
    OfcrljO)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    PRESSURE
    DIFFERENTIAL
    ACROSS
    ORIFICE
    METER.
    •mHjO
    (n.H;0)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    CAS SAMPLE
    VOLUME.
    .3 (ft))
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    J
    
    
    
    
    EAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
    AT DRY GAS METER
    INLET,
    »C(»F)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Avg
    oirnn,
    *C(»F)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Av«
    Av«
    TEMPERATURE
    Of GAS
    LEAVING
    CONDENSER OR
    LAST IMPINGER
    »C («F)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                 Flgur» §-2.
                                                                                      dau.
                                                                                 11-59
    

    -------
     ^ji »'UfjB  j  TBPAL  UiiliumfATTOH C* TKX
                or ucaaxomi  r»OM
             stationary sources discharge visible
             j Into th* atmosphere-,  the** •mis-
     sions are usually in toe chap*  of »  plum*.
     This method involve*  th*  determination of
     plum* opacity  by qualified  observers-  Th*
     method Include* procedure* for  th* training
     and certification of ob*erv«rs, and procedure* .
     to b* u**d_ln th* field tor  determination of
     plum* opacity. The appearance of a plum* as
     Tlewed byran observer depend* upon a num-
     ber of vartmblsa, sou of which may b* con-
     IroiUil* and  MB*  of which  may Dot  b*
     eontroUabl* la tb* Odd. Variable* wnlch can
     b« eootrollirt to an «rt»nt  to which  tU*y no
     longer  exert a significant Influence upon
     plum* appearance Include: Angle of the ob-
     server with reapect to the plume; angle of the
     observer with respect  to the *un; point of
     observation of attached and detached steam
     plume;  and angle of the  observer with re-
     spect to a plume emitted from a rectangular
     Made with a Large length to width ratio. The
     TTHrftirxl  Includes specific criteria applicable
     to the** variable*.
       Other vartabk  which may not b« control-
     lable In  the fleiu are luminescence and color
     contrast betwei  the plume and the back-
     ground against  vilch the plume it viewed.
     These variables  exert an Influence upon the
     mpp«arance of a plume a*  viewed by an ob-
     server, and can  affect the  ability of th* ob-
     server to accurately assign  opacity value*
     to the observed plume. Studies of the theory
     of plume opacity and field studies have dem-
     onstrated that a plume if moat risible and
     presents the greatest apparent opacity when
     viewed against a contrasting background. It
     follows  from this, and  is confirmed by  field
     trial*, that the  opacity of a plume, viewed
     under conditions where a  contrasting back-
     ground is present can b« assigned with the
     greatest degree of accuracy. However, the po-
    •*tential for a positive error is alao the greatest
     when a plume l£ viewed under such contrast-
     ing  conditions. Undrr  conditions presenting
     a less contrasting  background, the apparent
     opacity  of a plume Is  lees and approaches
     eero as the color and luminescence contrast
     decree** toward zero. As a  result, significant
     negative  blag and negative errors can  b*
     mad* when a  plume  U viewed under  less
     contrasting condition*. A  negative bias de-
     creases  rather than Increases the possibility
     that a plant operator will be cited for a vio-
     lation of opacity standards dne to observer
     •rror.
       Studies have been undertaken to determine
     the  magnitude of  positive errors which  can
     be man> by qualified  observers while read-
     Ing plumes under contrasting condition* and
     •using  the  procedures  set  forth  in  this
     method. The results of  these studies (field
     trials) which  Involve a total of 709 set* of
     25 reading* each are as follows:
        (I) For black plumes (133 sets at a rmoke
     generator),  100 percent  of the  a«u  wsr»
     read with a positive error' of less tbAn 7.6
     percent_opaclty; 99 percent were read  with
     a positive error of leas than 5 percent opacity.
        (3) For white plumes (170 sets at a imoke
     generator, 168 if It at a coal-fired power plant,
     398 sets  at a ruifurtc acid plant). 99 percent
     of the Mts were read with a positive error of
     leas than 7 J percent opacity, 95 percent were.
     read with a poaltiv* error oTleas than 5 per-
     cent opacity.
       Tn* positive observation*! error associated
     •with  an average of  twenty-five reading! Is
     therefor* established.  Th* accuracy  of  th*
     method  muat be taken  Into account-when
      determining possible   violations  of appli-
     cant* opacity standaid*..
    
       t far a art, poatUr* *rrar=av»rag» opacity
     «J*termiQsd b- observes'  35 observation*—
     Average  opacity d«t*rmln*d .from tranxmJc-
     •omstert U recordings.
       1. Principle and appltcoMllfy.
    
       l.f Principle.  Tb*  opacity  of •mission*
     from  stationary source* is determined  rts-
     tusUy  by a qualified observer. -
       1.2  Applicability. This  method  is appll-
     eabl* for the  determination oi th* opacity
     of emissions from stationary  source*  pur-
     suant to I 60.11 (b)  and for qualifying ob-
     server*  for visually  determining opacity of
    ^•missions.
       2.  froetdufti.  The  obaerrw  q-uallfled m
     accordance with paragraph S of this method
     ahau  ns* the  following  procedural  for  vis-
     ually detarmlnlng th* opacity of •mleslons:
       1.1  fosltlon  - Th* qualified obeerver »*^"
     Itand at a distant* sufficUnt  to provld* a
     clear  view  of  the emissions with th*  sun
     oriented in th* 140* sector to hi* back. Con-
     sistent with maintaining thi above require-
     ment, the obeerrer shall, as much as possible.
     make his obeervatlonj from a poaltion  such
     that  his  line  of vision  Is approximately
     perpendicular  to th*  plum* direction,  and
     when observing opacity of emissions from
     rectangular outlets (e.g. roof monitors,  open
     beghousea,   nonclrcular   stacks),  approxi-
     mately  perpendicular  to th* longer axis of
     the outlet. The observer's line of sight should
     not Include  more t.h«n one plume at a  time
     when multiple stacks are Involved, «"fi In
     any case the observer should make his ob-
     servations with his line of  sight perpendicu-
     lar to the longer »**» of such a set of multi-
     ple  (tacks  (e.g.  stub stacks on beghouaes).
       3J2  Field  records.  Th*  observer  ahall  re-
     cord the name of the plant, emission loca-
     tion,  type  facility,  observer's -name   and
     affiliation, and the dat« on a field data sheet
     (Figure 9—1). The time, estimated distance
     to the emission  location, appro limits  wind
     direction, estimated  wind  speed, description
     of the sky condition  (preaence  and color of
     clouds), and plume background art recorded
     on a field data sheet at the time opacity read-
     ings  are Initiated  and completed.
       2.3  Observations.   Opacity   observations
     ahall bo made at the point of greatest opacity
     In that  portion of  the plume where  con-
     densed  watet vapor  1* not present. Tb* ob-
     server sh&U not look continuously  at the
     plume,  but  Instead shall observe Uv* plume
     momentarily at  l£-second Interval*.
       3.3.1  Attached  steam plume*. When con-
     densed  water vapor  1* present within the
     plume as It emerges from  the emission out-
     let, opacity observation* ahall be made  be-
     yond the point In the plume  at which con-
     densed  water vapor is no longer visible. The
     observer shall record  the  approximate  dis>
     tanc* from  the emission outlet to the point
     in the plume at which the observations are
     made.
       2.3.2  Detached steazn plume. When water
     vapor In the plume eoodenaee and becomes
     visible at a  distinct distance from the emis-
     sion outlet, the opacity of emissions should
     be evaluated at the emission outlet prior to
     the condensation of water  vapor and the for-
     mation of the steam plume.
       2.4  Recording  observations.  Opacity  ob-
     servations shall  be recorded to the nearest  5
     percent  at  l&^&eoond Intervals on an  ob-
     servational record sheet. (See Figure 9-3 for
     an example.) A minimum  of 34 observations
     shall be recorded. Each momentary observa-
     tion recorded ahull  bo deemed to represent
     the average opacity of smU&lon* for >  15-
     •econd period.
       3.5  Data Reduction. Opacfty shall be de-
     termined as an  average  of 34 consecutive
     observations recorded  at 15-eecond Intervals.
     Divide th* observations recorded on the rec-
     ord sheet Into seta of 24 consecutive obser-
     vations. A set  Is  compoeed of  any 24  con-
     secutive observations. Bets need not b*  con-
     secutive in time  and in no case  shall  two
     Mts  overlap. For e*ch set of 34  observations,
     calculate the average by summing th* opacity
     of th* 34 observations and dividing -this sum
     by 34. If an applicable standard specifies an
     averaging time requiring more th.r) 34 ob-
     servations,  calculate the average for all ob-
     servations  mad* during th* specified time
     period. Record the average opacity on a record
     sheet. (Bee Figure 9-1 for an example.)
       8.
       8.1  CertlficaUoa requirements. To receive
     wrtlfleatloo as • qualified observer, a can*
     dldat* must b* tasted and demonstrate the
     ability to assUgn opacity readings la 5 percent
     Increments to  35 different black plum** »"*1
     M different whit* plum**, with  an  error
     not to *»f**d It perant opacity en any one
     m*i11nE  and an average error -not  to exceed
     1J6 percent opacity in each category. Candi-
     dates shall be tested according to the pro-
     cedure*  described  In paragraph 3.3. Smoke
     generator!  used  pureuant to paragraph  32
     «**" be  equipped with a smoke meter which
     meet* the requirements of paragraph  33.
       The certification shall be valid for a period
     of 6 months, at which time the qualification
     procedure must be repeated  by any observer
     In order  to retain certification.
    •  SJ Certification procedure. The certifica-
     tion teet consists of showing the candidate a
     complete run of 50 plumes— 26  biack plume*
     »<-"l 26 wtilte plumes— generated by a smoke
     generator. Plume* within each set of 26 buck
     and 26 white runs shall be presented in ran-
     dom order. The candidate  assigns an opacity
     value to each  plume and  records his  obser-
     vation on a suitable form.  At the completion
     of each run of 60 readings, the score  of the
     candidate is determined. If a candidate falls
     to qualify,  the complete run of 50 readings
     must be repeated  in any  retest. The  smoke
     test may be administered as  part of a smoke
     school or training program, and may be pre-
     ceded by training or familiarization runs of
     the smoke generator during which candidates
     are shows black and white plumes of knows.
     opacity.
     - 33 Smoke  generator spectfloatlons. Any
     amoke generator  used for the purposes of
     paragraph S 2 &hall be equipped  with » amoks
     meter  Installed  to measure opacity  across
     the dfavmeter of  the smoke generator stack.
     The- cznoke meter output shall display in-
     vtack opacity ba&ed upon a pathjength equal
     to the atack exit diameter, on a full 0 to 100
     percent  ch&rt  recorder scale. The  amoks
     meter optical design and  performance shall
     meet the specifications shown  In Table 9-1.
     The sxnolte me&er shall be calibrated as pre-
     scribed  In paragraph 8.3.1 prior to the con-
     duct  of each  amolte reading  teet.  At the
     completion of  each test, the zero  and span
     drift  «*»Ji  be  checked and  If  the drift ex-
     ceeds iJ percent opacity, the condition ahsJl
     be eorreoted prior to conducting any  subse-
     quent teat  runs. Th« smoke meter «><«ii be
     Demonstrated,  at the time of installation, to
     m«rt the specifications listed  In Table 9-1.
     This demonstration ahall bo  repeated fol-
     lowing a£y subsequent repair or replacement
     ol th* photocell or  associated electronic cir-
     cuitry Including the chart  recorder or output
     me-ter, or *»ry 6 months, whichever  occur*
     firvt.
       ».SJ   Calibration. Tn*  smoke  met*?  is
     calibrated after  allowing  « minimum of >0
     .mlnutee  wannup  by alternately producing
     simulated opacity of 0 percent and 100 per-
     cent. When st&ble response  at 0 percent or
     100 percent Is  noted,- the amoke meter Is ad-
     justed to produce an output of 0 percent of
     100 percent, a* appropriate. Tnl* calibration
     ahall b* repeated ante stable 0 percent and
     100 percent reading* are  produced without
     adjustment. Simulated 0 percent and  100
     percent  opacity values may  be produced by
     alternately switching th* power to the light
     source oa and  off while th* amoks generator
     if cot producing smok*.
                                                                         11-60
    

    -------
                                ••BOOT JJTD
          	               Speotfleatton
    *- t^»V. SMirce.	  Incandeeoent
                            operated at
                            t%ted roltage.
    »x apeetral  response.  Pbotopio    (daylight
         «f photocell.       •pectral nepoaM of
                            tbe  human
                          .  refereix>e *J).
    c. Angle c^Tlew	  15-
    *- Angle  of projec-  15'  m^TtmiiT^  total
         Uon-r            angle.
    •. Calibration error.  -±a%  opacity,  maxl-
    
    X. Zero  and  span  ±a%   opacity,   30
        •drift              minutes,
    f. Beer cms*  Ume._  S3 t*TVlii.
            Smoke meter evaluation. The smoke
    meter design and performance are  to be
    erraluated a£ tolJoa-s:
      3.3.2.1  light source.  Verify truui manu-
    facturer's data  and froir  rolt*g«  matsujfr-
    meuts mmd« at the lamp, aa InstaUed. tbat
    the  Ump ia operated  irttiiji :±J percent of
    tte  nominal rated voltage.
      8J^^  SpectpaJ  recponae  of  photocell.
    Verify from manufacturer'*  d«,t«  t33»t tbe
    photocell b«j a photople  response; 1*, tie
    •pectra!  aensltlrlty of tbe cell  thai! closely
    approximate the ft&ndard spectral-luminos-
    ity curre for photoplc rtston  which Is refer-
    enced la  (D) of Table 9-1.
      SJJ2J  Angle of rl«™r. Check  coortnictlon
    geometry to enrure tbkt the total  angle of
    new of  the cmolce plume. tJ  ceen. by tbe
    photocell.  <3oe< not exceed  1C*.  Tbe  total
    angle of Tlev m&y be  calculated frccn:  /=S
    tan-1  d/ZL,  where 1 = total  angle of -rl»r,
    d=the rum of  the photocell dlameter+Che
    ter of  tne  limiting   aperture;  and
    l>=tbe dlrtaHce from the photoceU to th*
    limiting aperture.  The limiting aperture K
    the  point In th« pate  between tbe pbotooeQ
    and  tbe  amoke  plum*  where tiie  angle at
    rl*w U mart restricted.  In nnok» f«nerator
    •mokj metcn  tbJ« it normally -an orifice
    plate.
      3.3.3.4  Angle  of projection.  Obeck  oon-
              f»ometry to enrure tbat 'lt>» total
    •agle  of  projection  of  tb«  lamp  en the
    •not* plume doe* not aic«d  IB*. Tb* total
    angle of projection may be calculated from:
    t=3 tan-' d/2L, where «= total angle of pro-
    jection; d= tbe lum of tbe  length of the
    lamp filament + tbe diameter  of tbe *i*r\it)T^
    aperture; and L= the dlstanoe  from tb« Ump
    to tbe limiting aperture.
      l£3£ Calibration error. Udng neutral-
    denalty niter* of known opacity, obeck tbe
    error between tbe  actual re«pon*e arul tbe
    theoretical  linear  reeponse  of tbe  unoke
    awter. Tbli check  li aooompUabed  by firrt
    calibrating  tbe  emote meter according  to
    84.1  and then  Inserting a aerie*  of  three
    neutnl-dentlty filters of T>nrr*  100 percent opacity
    ralues and observing  tbe time required  to
    reach stable reepom*. Opacity ralue*) of 0
    percent and 100 percent may be simulated
    by  alternately twitching tbe  power to tbe
    light  source OS and  on while tbe smoke
    generator Is not operating.
      4. Etjcrcncts.
      4.1  Air  Pollution Control  District  Rules
    and  Regulations, Los Angeles  County  Air
    Pollution  Control  District, Regulation IV,
    Prohibitions, Rule 50.
      4.Z  WeUburd, Melrln t, Field Operations
    and Enforcement Manual for  Air, UJ3. Envi-
    ronmental Protection Agency, Boeeircb Tri-
    angle  Park, N.O,  APTD-1100. Aufuct 1B72.
    pp. 4.1-4.38.
      4-S  Condon, E. U., «TM< Odlshaw, H. Band -
    boot of Physics, McOrmw-HUl  Co, K.T, N.T,
    KM, Table 3.1, p. 6-42.
                                                                       11-61
    

    -------
                                         RECORD OF VISUAL DETERMINATION OF OPACITY
                        PAGE    of
    COMPANY	
    LOCATION	
    TEST NUMBER
    DATE	
    TYPE FACILITY^
    CONTROL DEVICE
    HOURS OF OBSERVATION.
    OBSERVER     	
    OBSERVER CERTIFICATION  DATE_
    OBSERVER AFFILIATION	
    POINT OF EMISSIONS	
    HEIGKT OP DISCHARGE POINT
    CLOCK TIME
    OBSERVER LOCATION
      Distance to Discharge
      Direction from Discharge
      Height of Observation Point
    BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION
    WEATHER CONDITIONS
      Hind Direction
      Wind Speed
      Ambient Temperature
    SKY CONDITIONS (clear.
      overcast. % clouds, etc.) .
    PLUME DESCRIPTION
      Color
      Distance Visible
     071IER
    Initial
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Final
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    K
    1
    t
    SUMMARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY
    Set
    Number
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    -
    limp
    Start— End
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Opacity • .
    Sum
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    > r ' - •• •
    eadlngs ranged from ^ 	 to 	 X opac
    he source was/was not in compliance wit
    he time evaluation was made.
    Average
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ity
    h .at
    
    

    -------
                    FIGURE 9-2  OBSERVATION RECORD
                       PAGE
    COMPANY
    LOCATION
    TEST NUMBtT
    IWTE	
    OBSERVER 	
    TYPE FACILITY"  '
    POINT OF EMlSSlOTir
    Hr.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    H1n.
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    /
    B
    9
    10
    |l
    12
    13
    14
    15
    Ib
    I/
    1H
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    2S
    26
    27
    28
    29
    
    0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Seconds
    15
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    JO
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    '.._.'
    TYPE FACILITY   """"
    POINT OF EMissTMT
    Hr.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Mln.
    30
    31
    32
    33
    34
    35
    36
    37
    38
    39
    40
    41
    42
    43
    44
    45
    46
    4;
    48
    49
    50
    51
    52
    53
    54
    55
    56
    57
    58
    59
    Seconds
    0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    45
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    STEAM PLUME
    (check If «poHcable)
    Attached
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Detached
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    COWENTS
    
    
    
    i
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                                                    |FR Doc.74-38160 Filed 11-11-74;B:1S am)
    

    -------
     Method 19. Determination of Sulfur
     Dioxide Removal Efficiency and
     Paniculate, Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen
     Oxides Emission-Rates From Electric
    ~ Utility Steam Generators
     1. Principle and Applicability
       1.1  Principle.
       1.1.1  Fuel samples from before and
     after fuel pretreatment systems are
     collected and analyzed for sulfur and
     heat content, and the percent sulfur
     dJoxide  (ng/joule, Ib/million Bru)
     reduction is  calculated on'a dry basis.
     (Optional Procedure.)
       1.1.2  Sulfur dioxide  and oxygen or
     carbon dioxide concentration data
     obtained from sampling emissions
     upstream and downstream of sulfur
     dioxide  control devices are used to"
     calculate sulfur  dioxide removal
     efficiencies.  {Minimum Requirement.) As
     an alternative to sulfur  dioxide
     monitoring upstream of sulfur dioxide
     control devices, fuel samples may be
     collected in an as-fired condition and
     analyzed for sulfur and heat content
     (Optional Procedure.)
       1.1.3  An  overall sulfur dioxide
     emission reduction efficiency is
     calculated from  the efficiency of fuel
     pretreatment systems and the efficiency
     of sulfur dioxide control devices.
       1.1.4  Participate, sulfur dioxide,
     nitrogen oxides, and oxygen or carbon
     dioxide  concentration data obtained
     from sampling emissions downstream
     from sulfur dioxide control devices are
     used along with F factors to calculate
     participate, sulfur dioxide, and  nitrogen
     oxides emission rates. F factors are
     values relating combustion gas  volume
     to the heat content of fuels.
       1.2  Applicability. This method is
     applicable for determining sulfur
     removal efficiencies of fuel pretreatment
     and sulfur dioxide control devices and
     the overall reduction of potential sulfur.
     dioxide emissions from  electric utility
     steam generators. This method  is also
     applicable for the determination of
     participate, sulfur dioxide, and  nitrogen
     oxides emission  rates.
    
     2. Determination of Sulfur Dioxide
     Removal Efficiency of Fuel
     Pretreatment Systems
      2.1  Solid Fossil Fuel.
      2.1.1  Sample Increment Collection.
     Use ASTM D 2234 '. Type I, conditions
      A. B, or C, and systematic spacing.
      Determine the number and weight of
      increments required per gross sample
      representing each coal lot according to
      Table 2 or Paragraph 7.1.5.2 of ASTM D
      2234 '. Collect one gross sample for-*ach
      raw coal lot and one gross sample for
      each product coal lot.
       2.1.2  ASTM Lot Size. For the pujpose
      of Section 2.1.1, the product coal lot size
      is defined  as the weight of product coal
      produced from one type of raw coal. The
      raw coal lot size is the weight of raw
      coal used to produce one product coal
      lot. Typically, the  lot size is the weight
      of coal processsed in a 1-day (24 hours)
      period. If more than one type of coal is
      treated and produced in 1 day, then
      gross samples must be collected and
      analyzed for each type of coal. A coal
      lot size equaling the 90-day quarterly
      fuel quantity for a specific  power plant
      may be used if representative sampling
      can be conducted for the raw coal and
      product coal.
       Note.—Alternate definition* of fuel lot
      sizes may be specified subject to prior
      approval of lie Administrator.
       2.1.3   Gross Sample Analysis.
      Determine the percent sulfur content
      (%S)  and gross calorific value (GCV) of
      the solid fuel on a dry basis for each
      gross sample. Use ASTM 2013 ' for
      sample preparation, ASTM D 3177 ' for
      sulfur analysis, and ASTM D 3173 ' for
      moisture analysis. Use ASTM D 3176 '
      for gross calorific value determination.
       2.2  Liquid Fossil FueL
       2.2.1  Sample Collection. Use .ASTM
      D 270 * following the practices outlined
      for continuous  sampling for each gross
      sample representing each fuel lot
       2-2.2  Lot Size. For the purposes of
      Section 2.2.1, the weight of product fuel
      from  one pretreatment facility and
      intended as one shipment (ship load,
      barge load, etc.) is defined  as one
      product fuel lot. The weight of each
    :  crude liquid fuel type used  to produce
      one product fuel lot is defined as one
      inlet fuel lot
       Note.— Alternate definitions of fuel lot
      sizes may be specified subject to prior
      approval of the Administrator.
       Note.— For the purposes of  this method,
      raw or inlet fuel (coal or oil) is defined as the
     fuel delivered to the desulfuriialion
     pretreatment facility or to the steam
     generating plant. For pretreated oil the input
     oil to the oil desulfurization process (e.g.
     hydrotrealraent emitted) i« sampled.
       2.2.3  Sample Analysis. Determine
     the  percent sulfur content (%S) and
     gross calorific value (GCV]. Use ASTMD
     240 ' for the sample analysis. This value
     can be assumed to be on a  dry basis.
      'U»e tie mo»l recent revision or designation of
    the ASTM procedure ip«d£ed           •
       1 U«e the mail recent revision or designs tioo of
     the ASTM procedure ipecified.
                                           11-64
    

    -------
      1.3  Calculation of Sulfur Dioxide Remov-
    al Efficiency Due to Fuel Pretreatment. Cal-
    culate the percent  sulfur  dioxide reduction
    due to fuel pretreatment  using  the  follow-
    ing equation:
             •c   100
    -VGCVo
    SS./GCV,
    Where:
         Sulfur dioxide removal efficiency due
       pretreatment: percent.
    %S0 = Sulfur content of the product fuel lot
       on a dry ba-sis; weight percent.
    %S, = Sulfur content of the inlet fuel lot on
       a dry basis; weight percent.
    GCV. = Gross calorific value for the outlet
       fuel lot on a dry basis: kJ/kg (Btu/lb). '
    GCV, = Gross  calorific  value  for the inlet
       fuel lot on a dry  basis; kJ/kg (Btu/lb),
      Norr.— If more than one fuel  type is used
    to produce the product fuel, use the follow-
    ing equation to calculate the sulfur contents
    per unit of heat content of the total fuel lot,
    %S/GCV:
    Where:
    %R. =Sulfur dioxide removal efficiency of
        the sulfur dioxide control system using
        inlet  and outlet monitoring data; per-
        cent.
    E»o , = Sulfur dioxide emission rate  from the
        outlet  of  the  sulfur  dioxide control
        system; ng/J (Ib/million Btu).
    E«, , = Sulfur d.oxide  emission  rate  to  the
        outlet  of  the  sulfur  dioxide control
        system; ng/J Ob/million Btu).
    
    
      3.3  As-fired Fuel Analysis (Optional Pro-
    cedure). If the owner or operator of an elec-
    tric utility steam generator chooses to deter-
    mine  the sulfur dioxide imput rate at  the
    inlet  to  the sulfur  dioxide  control device
    through  an as-fired fuel analysis in lieu of
    data  from  a sulfur dioxide  control  system
    inlet  gas monitor, fuel samples must be col-
    lected in arrorriance  with applicable para-
    graph  In Section 2. The  sampling can b«
    conducted upstream of any fuel processing.
    ;.g.,  plant coal pulverization. For  the  pur-
    poses of this section, a fuel  lot size Is de-
    fined as tries-weight of fuel  consumed  In 1
    day (2< hour*) and is directly related to the
    exhaust gas monitoring data at the  outlet of
    thf sulfur dioxide control system. .
               V
    
      3.3.1  Fuel Analysis. Fuel samples must bo
    uialyzed for sulfur content  and gross  calo-
    rific value. The ASTM procedures for deter-
    mining sulfur content are defined In the ap-
    plicable paragraphs of Section 2.
    
    
      3.3.2  Calculation ofSdlfur Dioxide Input
    Rite. The sulfur dioxide imput  rate deter-
    mined from fuel analysis is calculated bv:
                                       2.0(Kf)
    
                                       ~~GCV
                                      2.0(SS(
    
                                         GCV
                                      10    for S.  I. units.
                                    x  10    for Englisti uni ts.
                                                   Where:
        '.S/GCV
                      k = l
     Where:
     Yk = The fraction of total mass Input derived
        from each type, k, of fuel.
     %S>-Sulfur content  of each fuel type, k. on
        a dry basis; weight percent.
     GCV, = Gross calorific  value for  each fuel
        type. k. on a dry basis; kJ/kg (Btu/lb).
     n = The number of different types of fuels.
                            I    *  Sulfur dioxide input  rate  from as-fired  fuel  analysis,
    
                                   ng/J  (1 fa/million Btu).
    
                            ?S,  •  Sulfur content of as-fired  fuel, on  a dry  basis; weight
    
                                   percent.
    
                            GCV  «  Gross  calorific  value  for as-fired fuel, on a  dry basis;
    
                                 •kJ/kg  {Btu/lb).
    3. Determination of Sulfur Remove! Efficien-
       cy of the Sulfur Dioxide Control Device
    
      3 1   Sampling.  Determine  SO,  emission
    rates at the inlet and outlet of the sulfur
    dioxide control system according to meth-
    ods  specified in the applicable  subpart  of
    the regulations and the procedures specified
    in Section 5. The inlet sulfur dioxide emis-
    sion  rate may be determined through fuel
    analysis (Optional, see Section 3.3.)
    ''32  Calculation.  Calculate  the  percent
    removal efficiency using the following equa-
    tion:
      3.3.3  Calculation of Sulfur Dioxide Emit-
    jion Reduction Using As-fired Fuel Analysis.
    The sulfur dioxide emission reduction effi-
    ciency  is  calculated using  the sulfur imput
    rate from paragraph  3.3.2 and  the  sulfur
                    Where:
                                                             dioxide emission rate, £*„. determined  In
                                                             the applicable paragraph of Section 5.3. The
                                                             equation for sulfur dioxide emission reduc-
                                                             tion efficiency is:
                          IS ,f,  »  Sulfur  dioxide  removal  efficiency  of the  sulfur
    
                                    dioxide control  system  using  as-fired fuel  analysis
    
                                    data; percent.
                                                        j
    
                            ESO   *  Su1fuC-  di°xide  emission rate  from  .sulfur  dioxide  control
                               2
                                    system; ng/J  (Ib/million Btu).
                                                         I
                                    Sulfur  dioxide  input  rate  from as-f1red  fuel  analysis;
    
                                    ng/J (1b/million  Btu).
                                                                   11-65
    

    -------
    4. Calculation of Overall Reduction in
    Potential Sulfur Dioxide Emission
      4.1   The overall percent sulfur
    dioxide reduction calculation uses the
    sulfur dioxide concentration at the inlet
    to the sulfur dioxide control device as
                            the base value. Any sulfur reduction
                            realized through fuel cleaning is
                            introduced into the equation as an
                            average percent reduction, %R<.
                              4.2  Calculate the overall percent
                            sulfur reduction as:
                      JR
                                                  5R
         W
           o  *
    100C1.0. 0.0-T-g)  0.0 -
    Where:
                                  or CO. - based calculation  or calculated
          1H   » Overall  sulfur dioxide reduction;  percent.
    
          SR-  • Sulfur dioxide removal efficiency  of  fuel  pretreatanent
    
                 froia Section  2;  percent.  Refer  to applicable subpart
    
                 for definition of applicable averaging  period.
    
          IR   • Sulfur dioxide removal efficiency of  sulfur  dioxide control
    
      ->          device either
    
                 froo fuel analysis  and emission data, from Section 3;
    
                 percent.  Refer  to  applicable subpart for definition of
    
                 applicable averaging period.
    
     5. Calculation of Particulate, Sulfur
     Dioxide,jind Nitrogen  Oxides Emission
     Rates
       5.1  Sampling. Use the outlet SO» or     For  SI Units:
     Ot or COi concentrations data obtained
     In Section 3.1. Determine the participate,
     NO,, and O> or CO» concentrations
     according to methods specified in an
     applicable subpart of the regulations.
       5.2  Determination of an F Factor.
     Select an average F factor (Section 5.2.1)
     or calculate an applicable F factor
     (Section 5^2.). If combined fuels are
     fired the selected or calculated^ factors
     are prorated using the procedures in
     Section 5-2.3. F factors are ratios of the
     gas volume released during combustion
     of a fuel divided by the heat  content of
     the fuel. A dry F factor  (FJ is the ratio of
     the volume of dry flue gases generated
     to the calorific value of the fuel
     combusted a wet F factor (F,) is the
    ratio of the volume of wet Due gases
    generated to the calorific value of the
    fuel combusted and the carbon F factor
    (FJ is the ratio of the volume of carbon    	
    dioxide generated to tfie calorific value    **The
    of the fuel combusted When pollutant     hydrogen
      and oxygen concentrations have been
      determined in Section 5.1, wet or dry F
      factors are used. (Fw) factors and
      associated emission calculation
      procedures  are not applicable and may
      not be used after wet scrubbers; (Fe) or
      (FJ factors  and associated emission
      calculation  procedures are used after
      wet scrubbers.) When pollutant and
      carbon dioxide concentrations have
      been determined in Section 5.1. F,
      factors are used
       5.2.1  A verage F Factors. Table 1
      shows average Fd, F,, and Fe factors
      (scrn/J, scf/milJion Bru) determined for
      commonly used fuels. For fuels not
      listed in Table 1. the F factors are
      calculated according to the procedures
      outlined in Section 5.2.2 of this section.
       5.2.2  Calculating an F Factor. If the
      fuel burned  is not listed in Table 1 or if
      the owner or operator chooses to
      determine an F factor rather than use
      the tabulated data, F factors are
      calculated using the equations below.
     The sampling and analysis procedures
     followed in obtaining data for these
     calculations are subject to the approval
     of the Administrator and the
     Administrator should be consulted prior
    , to data collection.
                                                       227.0(M) * 9S.7(tQ  + 35.4(«)  + 8.6(SN) - 28.5(tO)
                                                                               SCV
    
                                                       347.4{W)+95.7(SC)+35.4(I5)+8.6(l«)-23.5{iOH3.0(IH20)»
                                                                              Tgj=y-       :
                                            For  English Units:
                                                       106[5.57(tH)  i- l.S3(IC)  * 0.57(tS) * 0.14(«Q - 0.46(10)]
                                                                               GCV
    
                                                       106[5.57(W)+l.S3(IC)+0.57(lS)+0.14(IN)-0.46(tO)+0.21(lH,0)**]
                                                                              SCV
                                                       106C0.3Z1(IC)]
                                                           GCV
                                      tern nay be oaltted
                                    »nd oxygen In the
                                                                        1f IH and 10 Include the unavailable
                                                                      fora of H-0.
                                                                11-66-
    

    -------
     Where:
     F«, F,, and Fe have the units of scm/J, or scf/
         million Btu; %H. %C, %S, *N. %O, and
         *H,O are the concentrations by weight
         (expressed in percent) of hydrogen,
         carbon, sulfuj, nitrogen, oxygen, and
         water from an ultimate analysis of the
         fuel; and  GCV is the gross calorific value
         of the fuel in kj/kg or Btu/lb and
         consistent with the ultimate analysis.
         Follow ASTM D 2015* for solid fuels, D
         240' forliquid fuels, and D 1826* for
         gaseou»3ruelg as applicable In
         determining GCV.
    
       5.2.3   Combined Fuel Firing F Factor.
    for affected facilities firing
     combinations of fossil fuels or fossil
     fuels and wood residue, the Fd, F,, or F.
     factors determined by Sections 5.2.1  or
     5-2.2 of this section shall be prorated in
     accordance with applicable formula  as
     follows:
     n
    *f,x>
     n
     I  x.
                      dk
                            or
                           or
              n
              I   x
             k-1
    kFck
    "Where:
     x« = Tbe fraction of total heat input derived
         from each type of fuel K.
     n=The number of fuels being burned in
         combination.
    
       5.3   Calculation of Emission Rate.
     Select from the following paragraphs the
     applicable calculation procedure and
     calculate the particulate, SOj, and  NOX
     emission rate. The values in the
     equations are defined as:
     E = Pollutant emission rate, ng/J pb/million
        Btu).
     C«= Pollutant concentration, ng/scm (lb/scf).
       Note, — It is necessary in some cases  to
     convert measured concentration units to *
     other units for these calculations.
       Use the following table for such
     conversions:
    
         Conv«r*kxi Factor* tor Concentration
          from—           To—      Mtrtply trf—
                                         10"
                                         10*
                                    i.eozxio"
                                    2.860x10'
                                    1.»12x10«
                                    1^60x10-'
                                    1.194X10-'
       5.3.1  Oxygen-Based F Factor
    Procedure.
       5.3.1.1  Dry Basis. When both percent
    oxygen (%O,I) and the pollutant
    concentration (CJ are measured in the
    flue gas on B dry basis, the following
    equation is applicable:
                                        Cd'Fd
                       20.9
                    20.9 -  10
                                                        2d
                                 5.3.1.2 " Wet Basis. When both the
                               percent oxygen (%0,.) and the pollutant
                               concentration (C.) are measured in the
                               flue gas on a wet basis, the following
                               equations are  applicable: (Note: Fw
                               ^factors are not applicable after wet
                               scrubbers.)
    
                               /.>     r  -  r  r   r	20-9	1
                               \mt    '    *•« rw   L2u.4(l  - a  )-lo. J
    
                               Where: -
                               B., = Proportion by volume of water vapor in
                                   the ambient air.
    
                                 In lieu of actual measurement, B,,
                               may be estimated as follows:
                                 Note.—The following estimating factors are
                               selected to assure that any negative error
                               introduced in the term:
    
                               /        20.9         ,
                                              V20.9(l -~
                                                                  '2ws
     will not be larger than —1.5 percent.
     However, positive errors, or over-
    'estimation of emissions, of as much as 5
     percent may be introduced depending
     upon the geographic location of the
     facility and the associated range of
     ambient mositure.
       (i) B»,=0.027. This factor may be used
     as a constant value at any location.
       (ii) E»,=Highest monthly average of
     Bw, which occurred within a calendar
     year at the nearest Weather Service
     Station.
       (iii] 8,,,:= Highest daily average of B^
     which occurred within a calendar month
     at the nearest Weather Service Station,
     calculated from the data for the past 3
     years. This factor shall be calculated for
     each month and may be used as an
     estimating factor for the respective
     calendar month.
                               (b)
                                                         20.9
                                                 20.9
                                                                M,
                               Where:
                               B^ = Proportion by volume of water vapor in
                                  the stack gas.
    
                                 5.3.1.3  Dry/Wet Basis. When the
                               pollutant concentration (C,) is measured
                               on a wet basis and the oxygen
                               concentration (%O>J or measured on a
                               dry basis, the following equation is
                               applicable: x.
                                                      CwFd
                                                       20,9
                                                                  L20.9 - SO
                                                              2d
                                 When the pollutant concentration (CJ
                               Is measured on a dry basis and the
                               oxygen concentration (%O^J is
                               measured on a wet basis, the following
                               equation is applicable:
    
                                                   11-67-
                                                    cdFd
                                                                                             20.9
                                                                                       20.9 -
                                                5.3.2  Carbon Dioxide-Based F Factor
                                              Procedure.
                                                5.3.2.1   Dry Basis. When both the
                                              percent carbon dioxide (%COa
                                                     d  c   -co2d
    
                                                5.3.2.2   Wet Basis. When both the
                                              percent carbon dioxide (SCO*,) and the
                                              pollutant concentration (C,) are
                                              measured on a wet basis, the following
                                              equation is applicable:
                                                                          5.3.2.3  Dry/Wet Basis. When the
                                                                        pollutant concentration (C») is measured
                                                                        on a wet basis and the percent carbon
                                                                        dioxide (%COi(J is measured on a dry
                                                                        basis, the following equation is
                                                                        applicable:
                                                                                ^Fc
                                                                               '     wv
                                                                                                   100
                                                                                                     D2d
                                                                          When the pollutant concentration (CJ
                                                                        is measured on a dry basis and the
                                                                        precent carbon dioxide (%CO»w) is
                                                                        measured on a wet basis, the foDowing
                                                                        .equation is applicable:
                                                                                               ,100
                                                                              'd'1
                                                                               5.4  Calculation of Emission Rate
                                                                             from Combined Cycle-Gas Turbine
                                                                             Systems. For gas turbine-steam
                                                                             generator combined cycle systems, the
                                                                             emissions from supplemental fuel fired
                                                                             to the steam generator or the percentage
                                                                             reduction in potential (SOi) emissions
                                                                             cannot be determined directly. Using
                                                                             measurements from the gas turbine
                                                                             exhaust (performance test, subpart GG)
                                                                             and  the combined exhaust gases from
                                                                             the steam generator, calculate the
                                                                             emission rates for these two points „
                                                                             following the appropriate paragraphs In
                                                                             Section 5.3.
                                                                               Note.—F. factors shall not be used to
                                                                            j determine emission rates from gas turbines
                                                                             because of the Injection of steam nor to
                                                                             calculate emission rates after wet scrubbers;
                                                                             Ft or Fe factor and associated calculation
                                                                             procedures are used to combine effluent
                                                                             emissions according to the procedure in
                                                                             Paragraph 5i3.
                                                                               The emission rate from the steam generator
                                                                             it calculated as:
    

    -------
                '
    
    Where:
    EM = Pollutant emission rate from steam
        generator effluent, ng/J (Ib/million Bru).
    E,=Pollutant emission rate in combined
        cycle effluent; ng/J (Ib/million Btu).
    Ew = PoIlutant emission rate from gas turbine
        effluent^ns/J (Ib/million Btu).
    X,. = Fraction of total heat input from
        supplemental fuel fired to the steam
        generator.
    X^=Fractio& of total heat input from gas
        turbine exhaust gases.
      Note. — The total heat input to the steam
    generator is the sum of the heat input from
    tupplemental fuel fired to the steam
    generator and  the heat input to the steam
    generator from the exhaust gases from the
    gat turbine.
       5.5   Effect of Wet Scrubber Exhaust.
     Direct-Fired Reheat Fuel Burning. Some
     wet scrubber systems require that the
     temperature of the exhaust gas be raised
     above the moisture dew-point prior to
     the gas entering the stack. One method
     used to accomplish this is directfiring of
     an auxiliary burner into the exhaust gas.
    The heat required for such burners is
     from 1 to 2 percent of total heat input of
     the steam  generating plant. The effect of •
     this  fuel burning on the exhaust gas
    components will be less than ±1.0
    percent and will have a  similar effect  on
    emission rate-calculations. Because of
    this small  effect a determination of
    effluent gas constituents from direct-
    fired reheat burners for correction  of
    stack gas concentrations is not
    necessary.
     Where:
     sc=Standard deviation of the average outlet
         hourly average emission rales for the
         reporting period; ng/J (Ib/million Bru).
     », = Standard deviation of the average inlet
         hourly average emission rates for the
         reporting period; ng/J (Ib/million Btu).
       6.3  Confidence Limits. Calculate the
     lower confidencelimit for the mean
     outlet emission rates for SOt and NO,
     and, if applicable'the upper confidence
     limit for the mean inlet emission rate for
     SO, using the following equations:
                            T»b)« 19-1.—FFactors for Various fuels'
                                   F.
                                                                          F.
    ft**.
    CD*
    ffcttmm* •
    Lv*1*
    n|b
    G*c
    l^fenl
    
    Aiten«
    M/i^in-'
    2 ifly 10"'
    
    
    10'Blu
    (10100)
    (9780)
    (9660)
    (9190)
    (8710)
    (8710)
    (8710)
    (9240)
    (9600)
    
    •son
    J ,
    2J3X10-'
    2.86X10-'
    S^1X10-'
    2.77X10-'
    174x10-'
    2.79X10-'
    
    
    md
    10'Btu
    (10S40)
    (10640)
    (11950)
    (10320)
    (10610)
    <10200)
    (10390)
    
    
    •cm
    J
    0^30x10-'
    0.484X10-'
    0.513x10-'
    OJ«3x10-'
    0^87X10-'
    0.321X10-'
    OJ37X10-'
    0.492X10-'
    0.4S7X10-'
    •d
    10'Blu
    (1970)
    (1800)
    (1910)
    (1420)
    (1040)
    (1190)
    (12SO)
    (1830)
    (1850)
     £,* = £, -(- V-8,
     Where:
     E.*=The lower confidence limit for the mean
         outlet emission rates: ng/J (Ib/million
         Bru).
     Ei* = The upper confidence limit for the mean
         inlet emission rate; ng/J (Ib/million Btu).
     V«.=Values shown below for the indicated
         number of available data points (n):
    
                                   (r.
                                  6.31
                                  2.42
                                  2.35
                                  2.13
                                  2.02
       • Aj dusfed (Cccnfng to ASTM D 388-66.
       k OjOe, residual, or dsUlat*.
       • Dotvmned tt EttttJarf condftcns. 2
        available for reporting period.
                                                    PCC
    The values of this table are corrected for
    n-1 degrees of. freedom. Use n equal to
    the number of hourly average data
    points.
    
    7. Calculation to Demonstrate
    Compliance When Available
    Monitoring Data Are Less Than the
    Required Minimum
       7.1  Determine Potential Combustion
    Concentration (PCC) for SO,.
       7.1.1   When the removal efficiency
    due to fuel pretreatnaent (% R,) is
    included in the overall reduction in
    potential sulfur dioxfde emissions (% RO)
    and the "as-fired" fuel analysis is not
    used, the potential  combustion
    concentration (PCCJ is determined as
    follows:
     10'; ng/J
                                                                                    01  10*; Ib/m-mion  Btu.
                                                                    Potential  emissions removed by the  pretreatnent
                                                                    process,  using  the fuel parameters  defined  In
                                                                    section  2.3; ng/J  (Ib/mllllon Btu).
                                                                   11-68    '
                          4- 2
    

    -------
      7.1.2  When the "as-fired" fuel
    analysis is used and the removal
    efficiency due to fuel pretreatment (% RJ
    is not included in the overall reduction
    in potential ru!fur droxide emissions (%
    RO), the potential combustion
    concentration (PCCJ is determined aa
    follows:
    PCC = I.
         Where:
         I, = The sulfur dioxide input rate as defined
            in aection 3.3
           7.1.3  When the "as-fired" fuel
         analysis is used and the removal
         efficiency due to fuel pretreatment (% RJ
         is included in the overall reduction (%
         RJ, the potential combustion
         concentration (PCC) is determined as
        -follows:
    PCC
    PCC
      7.1.4  When inlet monitoring data are
    used and the removal efficiency due to
    fuel pretreatment (% RJ is not included
    in the overall reduction in potential
    aulfur dioxide emissions (% RJ, the
    potential combustion concentration
    (PCC) is determined as follows:
    Where:
    EI* = The upper confidence limit of the mean
        inlet emission rate, as determined in
        iection 6.3.
    
      7.2  Determine Allowable Emission
    Rates [Eat].
      72.1  NO*. Use the allowable   v
    emission rates for NO, as directly
    defined by the applicable standard in  '
    terms of ng/J (Ib/million Btu).
      7.22  SO,. Use the potential
    combustion concentration (PCC) for SOi
    as determined in section 7.1, to
    determine the applicable emission
    standard. If the applicable standard is
    an allowable emission rate in ng/J (lb/
    million Btu), the allowable emission rate
    10'; ng/J
         1b/mmion 8tu.
    
    
        is" used as E^. If the applicable standard
        is an allowable percent emission,
        calculate the allowable emission rate
        (Eua) using the following equation:
    
        E«, = % PCC/100
        Where:
        S PCC = Allowable percent emissipn as
            defined by the applicable standard;
            percent                    —
    
          7.3  Calculate EC"/Eon. To determine
        compliance for the reporting period
        calculate the ratio:
    
        E.*/E«,
        Where:
        E.*-=The lower confidence limit for the
            mean outlet emission rates, as defined in
            section 6.3; ng/J (Ib/million Btu).
        E^ = Allowable emission rate as defined in
            section 7.2; ng/J (Ib/million Bru).
          If Eo'/E,,,, is equal to or less than 1.0, the
        facility is in  compliance; if E.'/E^,, is greater
        than 1.0, the facility is not in compliance for
        the reporting period.
        [FR Doc. 79-17W77 RW »-8-7B: 8:48 tm]
        WLUNO COO€ (MO-OV-M
                                                                 11-69-
    

    -------
     Method 20—Determination of Nitrogen
     Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, and Oxygen
     Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines
     1. Applicability and Principle
       1.1  Applicability. This method is
     applicable for the determination of nitrogen
     oxides (NO,), sulfur dioxide (SO2). and
     oxygen (O:) emissions from stationary gas
     turbines. For the NO, and O, determinations.
     this method includes: (1) measurement
     system design criteria. (2) analyzer
     performance specifications and performance
     test procedures: and (3)  procedures for
     emission testing.
       1.2  Principle. A gas sample is
     continuously extracted from the exhaust
     stream of a stationary gas turbine; a portion
     of the sample stream is conveyed  to
     instrumental analyzers for determination of
     NO, and O, content. During each NO, and
     OOi determination, a separate measurement
     of SO, emissions ts made, using Method 6, or
     it equivalent. The O, determination is used to
     adjust the NO, and SO*  concentrations to a
     reference condition.
    
     2. Definitions
       2.1  Measurement System. The  total
     equipment required for the determination of a
     gas concentration or a gas emission rate. The
     system consists of tie following major
     «u bsys terns:
       2.1.1   Sample Inlerface. That portion of a
     system that is used for one or more of the
     following: sample acquisition, sample
     transportation,  sample conditioning, or
     prelection of the analyzers from the effects of
     the stack effluent.
      2.1.2  NO, Analyzer. That portion of the
     system that senses NO, and generates an
     output proportional to the gas concentration.
      2.1.3  Oi Analyzer. That portion of the
     system that tenses O, and generates an
     output proportional to the gas concentration,
      2.2 Spen Value. The upper limit of a gas
     concentration measurement  range that is
    specified for affected source categories in the
    applicable part of the regulations.
        2-3  Calibration Gas. A known
      concentration of a gas in an appropriate
      diluent gas.
        2.4  Calibration Error. The difference
      between the gas concentration indicated by
      the measurement system and the known
      concentration of the calibration gas.
        2.5  Zero Drift. The difference in Ihe
      measurement system output readings before
      and after a stated period of operation during
    . .M'hich no unscheduled maintenance, repair,
      or adjustment took place and the input
      concentration at the time of the
      measurements was zero.
        2.6  Calibration Drift. The difference in the
      measurement system output readings before
      and after a stated period of operation during
      which no unscheduled maintenance, repair,
      or adjustment took place and the input at the
      time of the measurements was a high-level
      value.
        2.7  Residence Time. The elapsed time
      from the moment the gas sample enters the
      probe tip to the moment the same gas sample
      reaches the analyzer inlet.
        Z8  Response Time. The amount of time
      required for the continuous monitoring
      system to display on the data output 95
      percent of a step change in pollutant
      concentration.
        2.9  Interference Response. The output
      response of the measurement system to a
      component in the sample gas, other than the
      gas component being measured.
    
      3. Measurement System Performance
      Specifications
        3.1  NO, to NO Converter. Greater than 90
      percent conversion efficiency of NO, to NO.
        3.2  Interference Response. Less than ± 2
      percent of the span value.
        3.3  Residence Time. No greater than 30
      seconds.
        3.4  Response Time. No greater than 3
      minutes.
        3.5  Zero Drift. Less than ± 2 percent of
      the span value.
        3.6  Calibration Drift. Less than ± 2
      percent of the spsn value.
    
      4. Apparatus and Reagents
       4.1   Measurement System. Use any
      measurement system for NO, and O3 that is
      expected to meet the specifications in this
     method. A schematic of en acceptable
     measurement system is shown in Figure 20-1.
     The essential components of the
     measurement system are described below:
                 Figure 20 1.  Measurement system design lor settorwy 9*5 turbines.
                                                                              EXCESS
                                                                          SAMPLE TO VENT
       4.1.1  Sample Probe. Heated stainless
     steel, or equivalent, open-ended, straight rube
     of sufficient length to traverse the sample
     points.
       4.1.2 Sample Line. Heated (>95'C)
     stainless steel or Teflon* bing to  transport
     the sample gas to the sample conditioners
     and analyzers.
       4.1.3 Calibration Valve Assembly. A
     three-way valve assembly to direct the ie~Q
     and calibration gases to the  sample
     conditioners and to the analyzers. The
     calibration valve assembly shall be capable
     of blocking the sample gas flow ;ind of
     introducing calibration gasts to the
     measurement system when in the  calibration
     mode.
       4.1.4 NO, to NO Converter. That portion
     of the system that converts the nitrogen
     dioxide (NO,) in Ihe sample  gas to nitrogen
     oxide (NO). Some analyzers are designed to
     measure NO, as NOi on a wet basis and can
     be used without an NO, to NO converter or a
     moisture removal trap provided the sample
     line to the analyzer is heated (>95°C) to the
     inlet of the analyzer. In addjlion, an NO, to
     NO converter is not necessary if the NO,
     portion of the exhaust gas is less than 5
     percent of the total NO, concentration. As a
     guideline, an NO, to NO converter is not
     necessary if  the gas turbine i£ operated at 90
     percent or more of peak load capacity. A
     converter is necessary under lower load
     conditions.
       4.1.5 Moislure Removal Trap. A
     refrigerator-type condenser designed to
     continuously remove condt;rs;jte from the
     sample gas. The moisture n-mcval trap is not
     necessary for analyzers thbt can measure
     NO, concentrations on a wet basis: for these
     analyzers, (a) heat the sample line up to the
     inlet of the analyzers, (b) determine the
     moisture content using methods subject to th<
     approval of the Administrator, and (c) correcl
     the NO, and Oi concentrations to a dry basis
       4.1.8 Particulale Filter. An in-slack or an
     out-of-steck glass fiber filter, of the type
     specified in EPA Refrrencf MMhnd 5;
     however,  an  out-of-stack liller is
     recommended when the stark gas
     temperature  exceeds 250 to 300'C.
       4.1.7 Sample Pump. A nonreactive leak-
     free sample pump to pull the sample gas
     through the system at a flow rate sufficient tc
     minimize transport delay. The pump shall be
     made from stainless steel or coated with
     Teflon or equivalent.
      4.1.8  Sample Gas Manifold. A sample gas
    manifold to divert portions of the sample gas
    stream to the  analyzers. The manifold may be
    constructed of glass, Teflon, type 316
    stainless steel, or equivalent
      4.1.9  Oxygen and Analyzer. An analyzer
    to determine the percent O, concentration of
    the sample gas stream.
      4.1.10 Nitrogen Oxides Analyzer. An
    analyzer to determine the ppm NO,    i
    concentration in the sample gas stream.'
      4.1.11 Data Output. A strip-chart recorder,
    analog computer, or digital recorder for 1
    recording measurement data.
      4.2   Sulfur  Dioxide Analysis. EPA
    Reference Method 6 apparatus and reagents,
      4.3   NO, Caliberation Gases. The
    calibration gases for the NO, analyzer may
    be NO in N,. NO, in air or N,, or  NO and NO,
                                                                     11-70
    

    -------
    in N;. For NO, measurement analyzers lhat
    require oxidation of NO to NO3. the
    calibration gases must be in the form of NO
    in N,. Use four calibration gas mixtures as
    specified below:
     . 4.3.1  High-level Gas. A gas concentration
    that is equivalent to 80 to 90 percent of the
    span value.
     t 4.X2  Mid-level Gas. A gas  concentration
    tnat is equivalent to 45 to 55 percent of the
    span value.
      4.3.3  Low-level Gas. A gas concentration
    that i, equivalent to 20 to 30 percent of the
    spnn value.
      4.3.4  Zero Gas. A gas concentration of
    less than 0.25 percent of the span value.
    Ambient air may be used  for the NO, zero
    g;.3.
      4.4  Oj Calibration Gases. Use ambient air
    at 20.9 percent as the high-level Oi gas. Use a
    g.is concentration that is  equivalent to 11-14
    percent Oi for the mid-level gas. Use purified
    nitrpuen for the zero gas.
      4.5  NO,/NO  Gas Mixture.  For
    determining the conversion efficiency of the
    NO, to NO c.mverter. use a calibration gas
    m:\Ujr- of NO. nnd NO in N,.  The mixture
    i\. .1 \;z kr.imn concenirnnons  of 40 to bo ppru
    NO, and  Average must be 45 to 55% of span value.
    
    c Average must be 80 to 90% of span value.
    d Must be < ± 10% of applicable average or 10 ppm,
    
      whichever is greater.
    
                  Figure 20-2. Analysis of calibration gases.
                                                                 11-71
    

    -------
       S.3  Calibration Check. Conduct the
     calibration checks for both the NO, and the
     O, analyzers as follows:
       5.3.1  After the measurement system has
     been prepared for use (Section 5-2), introduce
     zero gases end ihe mid-level calibration
     gases; set the analyzer output responses to
     the appropriate levels. Then introduce each
     of the remainder of the calibration gases
     described in Sections 4.3 or 4.4, one at a time,
     (o the measurement system. Record the
     responses on a form similar to Figure 20-3.
       5.3J:  If the linear curve determined from
     the zero and mid-level calibration gas
     Tesponses does not predict the actual
     response of the low-level (not applicable for
     the Oj analyzer] and high-level gases within
     ±2 percent of the span value, the calibration
     shall be considered invalid. Take corrective
     measures on the measurement system before
     proceeding with the test.
       5.4   Interference Response. Introduce Ihc
     gaseous components listed in Table 20-1 into
     the measurement system separately, or as gas
     mixtures. Determine the total interference
     output response of the lystem to these
     components in concentration units; record the
     values on a form similar to Figure 20-4. If the
     sum of the interference responses of the lest
            gases for either the NO, or O, analyzers is
            greater than 2 percent of the applicable span
            value, take corrective measure on the
            measurement system.
            T«W« 20-1.— Interference Test Gas Concentration
    CO-
    SO,.
    CCs-
    Cs-
                                          500 -M ppm.
                                          ?00-SOppm.
                                          10± I percent.
                                ........ ___ ......... K 9 ± 1
                                            percent
                                  Ari.H,/--i i«ui|*«l
      Turbine type:,
    
      Date:	
      Identification number.
    
      Test number	
      Analyzer type:.
      Identification number.
                         Cylinder  Initial analyzer Final analyzer  Difference:
                          value,      response,       responses,     initial-final,
                         ppm or %    ppm or %      ppm or %       ppm or %
    Zero gas
    Low - level gas
    Mid - level gas
    High • level gas
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                    Percent drift =
    
                       Figure 20-3.
                                       Absolute difference
                           X 100.
       Span value
    
    Zero and calibration data.
      Conduct an interference response test of
    each analyzer prior to its initial use in the
    field. Thereafter, recheck the measurement
    system if changes are made in the
    instrumentation that could alter the
    Interference response, e.g., changes in the
    type of gas detector.
      In lieu of conducting the interference
    response  test, instrument vendor data, which
    demonstrate that for the tesl gases of Table
    20-1 the interference performance
           specification is nol exceeded, are acceptable.
             5.5  Residence and Response Time.
             5,5.1  Calculate the residence time of the
           sample interface portion of the measurement
           system using volume and pump flow rate
           information. Alternatively, if the response
           time determined as defined in Section 5.5.2 is
           less than 30 seconds, the calculations are not
           necessary.
             5-5.2  To determine response time, first
           introduce zero gas into the system at the
                                                                          11-72
    

    -------
    calibration valve until all readings are stable;
    then, switch to monitor the stack effluent
    until a stable reading can be obtained.
    Record the upscale response time. Next.
    introduce high-level calibration gas into the
    system. Once (he system has stabilized at the
    high-level concentration, switch to monitor
    the stack effluent and wait until a stable
    value is reached. Record the duwnscale
    response time. Repeat the procedure three
    times. A stable value is equivalent to a
                                             change of less than 1 percent of span value
                                             for 30 seconds or less than 5 percent of the
                                             measured average concentration for 2
                                             minutes. Record the response time data on a
                                             form similar to Figure 20-5, the readings of
                                             the upscale or downscale reponse time, and
                                             report the greater time as the "response time"
                                             for the analyzer. Conduct a response time
                                             test prior to the initial field use of the
                                             measurement system, and repeat if changes
                                             are made in the measurement system.
       Date of test.
       Analyzer type.
                                                         S/N
       Span gas concentration.
    
       Analyzer span setting_
       Upscale
                             1.
    
                             2
    
                             3.
    . ppm
    
    .seconds
    
    .seconds
    
    .seconds
              Average upscale response.
    
                                 1	
    
       Downscale             2.	
    
                                3	
                                                             .seconds
                                                    .seconds
    
                                                    .seconds
    
                                                    .seconds
             Average downscale response.
                                               	seconds
    
    System response time = slower average time =	seconds.
                            Figure 20-5.   Response time
      5.6  NO, NO Conversion Efficiency. '
    Introduce to fhe system, at the calibration
    valve assembly, the NO=/NO gas mixture
    [Section 4 5). Record the response of the NO,
    an.,|\ ™- If thf instrument response indices
    less li.jn «) l'-TC«nt N0= to NO cnm-pion.
    make correctums to the Masuremenl system
    and repeat the check. Alternatively, the NO,
    to NO converter rheck described in Title 40
    Part 80- Certification and TVs/ Procedure* for
    Heavy-Duty Engines for 19& and Later
    Model Years may be used. Other alternate
    procedures may be used with approval of the
    Administrator.
                                             6. Emission Measurement Test Procedure
    
                                               6.1  Preliminaries.
                                               6.1.1  Selection of a Sampling Site. Select a
    
                                             sampling site as close as practical to the
                                             exhaust of the turbine. Turbine geometry,
                                             stack  configuration, internal baffling, and
                                             point  of introduction of dilution-air will vary
                                             for different turbine designs. Thus, each of
                                             these  factors must be given special
                                             consideration in order to obtain a
                                             representative sample. Whenever possible,
                                             the sampling site shall be located upstream of
    the point of introduction of dilution air into
    the duct. Sample ports may be located before
    or after the upturn elbow, in order to
    accommodate the configuration of the turning
    varies and baffles and to permit a complete,
    unobstructed traverse of the stack. The
    sample ports shall not be located within 5
    feet or 2 diameters (whichever is less) of the
    gas discharge to atmosphere. For
    supplementary-fired, combined-cycle plants,
    the sampling site shall be located berween
    the gas turbine and the boiler. The diameter
    of the sample ports shall be sufficient to
    allow entry of the sample probe1.
      6.1.2  A preliminary Oi  traverse is made
    for the purpose of selecting low O3 values.
    Conduct this test at the turbine condition that
    is the lowest percentage of peak load
    operation included in the program. Follow the
    procedure below or alternative procedures
    subject to the approval of the Administrator
    may be used:
      6.1.2.1  Minimum Number of Points. Select
    a minimum number of points as follows: (1)
    eight, for stacks having cross-sectional areas
    less than 1.5 m: (16.1 ft1): (2) one sample point
    for each 0.2 m-(2.2 ft*of areas, for stacks of
    l.S m' to 10.0 m1 [16.1-107.6 ft*) in cross-
    sectional area; ar.d (3) one sample point for
    each 0.4 m" (4.4 ft-") of area, for stacks greater
    than 10.0 m * (107.6 ft ^ in cross-sectional
    area. Note that for circular ducts, the number
    of sample points must be a multiple of 4. and
    for rectangular ducts, the number of points
    must be one of those listed in Table 20-2;
    therefore, round off the number of points
    (upward), when appropriate.
      6.1.2.2   Cross-sectional  Layout and
    Location of Traverse Points. After the number
    of traverse points for the preliminary OJ
    sampling has been determined, use Method 1
    to located the traverse points.
      8.1.2.3   Preliminary OJ Measurement.
    While the gas turbine is operating at the
    lowest percent of peak load, conduct a
    preliminary O1 measurement as follows:
    Position the probe at the Erst traverse point
    and begin sampling. The minimum sampling
    time at each point shall be 1 minute plus the
    average system response time. Determine the
    average steady-state concentration of O2 at
    each point and record the data on Figure 20-
    6.
      6.1.2.4  Selection of Emission Test
    Sampling Points. Select the eight sampling
    points at which the lowest O' concentration
    were obtained. Use these same points for all
    the test runs at the different turbine load
    conditions. More than eight points may be
    used, if desired.
    
         Tabl« 2Q-2.—Crcss-s&:tx>f>al Lerovt tor
                            tecxs
    No
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Ot traverse pctfrti;
    <>
    1j
    IS
    M
    25. 	
    30 	 _
    36
    42
    O
    MM-
    tarn.
    3
    4
    
    *
    S
    K
    K
    7
    7
                                                                        II--73
    

    -------
                                                              Date.
             Pljnt	
    
             City, State	
    
       Turbine identification:
    
             Manufacturer	
             Model, serial number.
    
                Sample point
    Oxygen concentration, ppm
                   Figure 20-6.  Preliminary oxygen traverse.
      6.2  NO, and O» Xfeasurement. This lest is
    to be conducted at each of the specified load
    conditions. Three tfistruas at each load
    condition constitute a complete test.
      6.2.1  At  the beginning of each NO, test
    run and, as applicable, during the run, record
    turbine data as indicated in Figure 20-7. Also,
    record the location and number of the
    traverse poinU on a diagram.
    SLLLINC CODE « 560-01-W
       6.2.2  Position the probe at the tirst point
     determined in the preceding section and
     begin sampling. The minimum sampling time
     at each point shall be at least 1 minute plus
     the average system response time. Determine
     the average steady-state concenlralion of O,
     end ,N'O, at each point and record the data on
     Figure 20-8.
                                                                        IIr-74
    

    -------
      Test operator	
             I
      Turbine identification:
          Tyfie	
          Serial No	
      Location:
          Plant	
          City	
     TURBINE OPERATION RECORD
    
    	  Date-	
                        Ultimate fuel
                         Analysis  C
                                  H
                                  N
      Ambient temperature.
    
      Ambient humidity	
    
      Test time start	
                                  Ash
                                  H2O
                        Trace Metals
                                                  IMa
      Test time finish.
    
      Fuel flcxv ratea_
                                                  Va
                                                  etcu
      Water or steam.
          Flow rate3
      Ambient Pressure.
                        Operating load.
      aDescribe measurement method, i.e., continuous flow meter,
       Start finish volumes, etc.
    
      bi.e.. additional elements added for smoke suppression.
                 Figure 20-7.  Stationary gas turbine data.
    
    Turbine identification:
    
      Manufacturer .	_	
                                     Test operator name.
      Model, serial No.
    
    Location:
    
      Plant	
    
      City, State
    
    Ambient temperature
    
    Ambient pressure
    
    
    Date _	
    
    Test time • start
    
    Test time finish
                                     O2 instrument type _
                                          Serial No	
                                     NOX instrument type.
                                          Serial No	
    Sample
    point
    •
    ^tMf-p
    "
    
    
    Time,
    min.
    
    
    j
    
    
    of-
    %
    
    
    
    
    
    NO;.
    ppm
    
    
    
    
    
                                      3Average steady-state value from recorder
                                       instrument readout
    or
     BILLING CODE 6550-01-C
                          Figure 20-8.   Stationary gas turbine sample point record.
                                                            11-75
    

    -------
      6.2.3  After sampling the last point,
     conclude the test run by recording the final
     turban; operating parameters and by
     detenr.ining the zero and calibration drift, as
     follows:
      Immediately following the test ran at each
     load condition, or if adjustments are
     necessary for the measurement system during
     the tests, (^introduce the zero and mid-level
     cahbrd::on ^ases as described in Sections 4.3,
     and 4.4. orts at a time, to the measurement
     system alThe calibration valve assembly.
     (Ma*e .notdjustments to the measurement
     system ur.til after the drift checks are made].
     Record the analyzers' responses on a form
     similar to Figure 20-3. If the drift values
     exceed the specified limits, the test run
     preceding the check is considered invalid and
     will be repeated following conections to the
     measurement system. Alternatively, the test
     results may be accepted provided the
     measurement system is recalibrated and the
     calibration data that result in the highest
     corrected emission rate are used.
      6.3  SO, Measurement. This test is
     conducted only at the 100 percent peak load
     condition. Determine SO, using Method 6, or
     equivalent, during the lest Select a minimum
     of six total points from those required for the
     NO, measurement*; use two points for each
     sample run. The sample time at each point
     shall be at least 10 minutes. Average the O,
     readings taken during the NO, test runs at
     sample points corresponding to the SOj
     traverse points (see Section (L2.2) and use
     this average O, concentration to correct the
     integrated SO> concentration obtained by
     Method 6 to 15 percent O, (see Equation 20-
    !)•
      If the applicable regulation allows fuel
    sampling and analysis for fuel  sulfur content
     to demonstrate compliance with sulfur
    emission unit emission sampling with
    Reference Mt Jjod 6 is nol required, provided
      the fuel sulfur content meets the limits of the
      regulation.
    
      7. Emission Calculations
       7.1  Correction to 15 Percent Oxygen.
      Using Equation 20-1, calculate the NO, and
      SO, concentrations (adjusted to 15 percent
    ,  O;). The correction to 15 percent Oz is
      sensitive to the accuracy of the O,
      measurement. At the level of analyzer drift
      specified in the method (±2 percent of full
      scale], the change in the O: concentration
      correction can exceed 10 percent when the O,
      content of the exhaust is above 16 percent O,.
     Therefore Oj analyzer stability and careful
     calibration are necessary.
                       5_J.'	(Equation 20-1)
     Where:
       C^u~Pollutant concentration adjusted to
        15 percent O, (ppm)
       C^-u = Pollutant concentration measured,
        dry basis (ppm)
       5.9=20.9 percent O,-15 percent O,, the
        defined O, correction basis
       Percent O, = Percent O, measured, dry
        basis (%)
       7.2  Calculate the average adjusted NO,
     concentration by summing the point values
     and dividing by the number of sample points.
    
     8. Citations
       8.1  Curtis, F. A Method for Analyzing NO,
     Cylinder Gases-Specific Ion Electrode
     Procedure, Monograph available from
     Emission Measurement Laboratory, ESED,
     Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711, October
     1978.
     [FR Doc. 79-27933 Filed 9-7-79. 8:
    -------
                            NCi Srtcrrrc»noNS
    
      Performance Specification 1—Performa»ce
    specifications and specification test  proce-
    dures  for tranimisaometer systems for con-
    tinuous measurement of the opacity of
    •tick emissions .
      1. Principle and Applicability.
      1 1  Principle   The  op«clry of paniculate
    matter In  stack  emissions Is measured by a
    continuously operating  emission  measure-
    ment  system. These systems are based upon
    the  principle of  transmlssometry which Is a
    direct measurement  of the attenuation  cf
    visible radiation  (opacity)  by paniculate
    matter In a  stack effluent. Light having spe-
    cflc  spectral  characteristics If projected from
    a lamp across the stack of a pollutant source
    to a light sensor. The  light Is attenuated due
    to absorption and scatter by the paniculate
    matter In the   effluent  The  percentage  of
    visible light attenuated  Is defined  as  the
    opacity of the emission.  Transparent stack
    emissions  that  do not attenuate  light will
    have a transmlttance  of 100 or  an  opacity of
    0. Opaque stack  emissions that attenuate  all
    Of the visible light will have a transmlttance
    of 0 or sn opftclty of  100 percent. The trs,ns-
    mlssometer  Is evaluated  by use of neutral
    density niters to determine the precisian of
    the  continuous  monitoring system. Tests of
    the  system are performed to determine zero
    drift,  calibration  drift,  and response time
    characteristics of the system.
      1.2  Applicability. This  performance  spe-
    cification  Is  applicable  to the continuous
    monitoring systems specified In the subparts
    Jor measuring op&clty cf  emissions. Specifi-
    cations tor continuous measurement of vis-
    ible emissions are elven In  terms  of  design.
    performance, and  Installation parameters.
    These specification* contain test procedures.
    Installation  requirements, and  data compu-
    tation procedures .for evaluating the  accept-
    ability of th* continuous monitoring systems
    subject to approval by the  Administrator.
      2. Apparatus.
      2.1  Calibrated Filters. Optical filters with
    neutral spectral   characteristics and  known
    optical densities to risible  U^ht  or  screens
    toovn to produce specified optical densities.
    Calibrated filters with accuracies certified by
    the  manufacturer  to  within   ±3  percent
    opacity chsjl be used. Filters  required  are
    low, mid, and hlRh-range  filters with nom-
    inal optical  densities as  follows  when  the
    transmlssometer is spanned at  opacity levels
    specified by  applicable  subparts:
                     Calibrated filler oDUcal densiricj
                       will/ «julr»ltni opiciry In
        8p«n Ttluf             parenthesis
    
    60 	
    60 	
    TO
    M 	
    W
    100
    
    Low- M1
    .1 (20)
    	 ) (20)
    	 1 (20)
    
    2 (ST)
    » (SO)
    > (SO)
    4 (60)
    « 
    Hlch-
    nncr
    as (so
    .1 (SO)
    .4 w:
    .6 (Ti)
    .1 <&'
    .« <£7H>
      It Is recommended that filter calibrations
    b«. checked with a well-colllmited pbotoplc
    transmlssometer of tnown linearity prior to
    use. The filters shall  be of sufficient size
    to attenuate  the entire  light  beam of  the
    transmlssometer.
      3.2 Data  Recorder. Analog chart recorder
    or other suitable device  with  Input voltage
    range comestible with the  analyzer system
    output.  The  resolution  of the  recorder's
    data output shall be sufficient to allow com-
    pletion  of the  test procedures wltiln this
    »pedfl cation.
      2.3 Opacity measurement System. An  In-
    st»ck  trsnsmlssometer  (folded  or  single
    p«th) with the optical design specifications
    designated  balow,  associated control units
    and apparatus to keep optical surfaces clean.
      S. Definitions.
      3.1 Continuous  Monitoring System.  The
    total equipment required for  the determina-
    tion of pollutant opacity In a source effluent
    Continuous monitoring systems  consist of
    major subsystems as follc-ws:
      1.1.1 Sampling Interface. The portion  of a
    continuous monitoring  system for  opacity
    that protects  the analyser from the effluent.
      2.12 Analyzer. That portion of the con-
    tinuous monitoring system which senses the
    pollutant and generates a signal output thai.
    Is a function  of the pollutant opacity.
      3.1 J Date Recorder. That  portion of the
    continuous monitoring system that processes
    the  analyzer output  and provides a perma-
    nent record of the  output signal In terms of
    pollutant opacity.
      3.2 Transmtssometer. The portions of  s,
    continuous monitoring  system 'or  opacity
    that Include the campling Interface end the
    analyzer.
      33 Span. The value of opacity at •which
    the  continuous monitoring system  is set to
    produce the maximum data display  output.
    Toe span  shall be set at an opacity  specified
    In each applicable subpart.
      3.4 Calibration Error. Tbe difference be-
    tween the opacity  reading Indicated by the
    continuous  monitoring   system   and  the
    known values of a •series  of  test  standards
    Por  this  method  the test standards are a
    •ertes of calibrated optical  filters  or  screens.
      3.5 Zero Drift. The change in continuous
    monitoring system  output over a  stated pe-
    riod of time of normal continuous operation
    wheai  tbe pollutant concentration  at  the
    dm* of ttoe measurement* U Kro
      *.« Calibration Drtrt.  Tbe obange in  the
    continuous monitoring system output over
    a stated period of time of normal continuous
    operation when the pollutant concentration
    at the time of the measurements Is the same
    known upscale value.
      3.7 System  Response. The time  Interval
    from a step change io opacity In the stack
    at the input  to the continuous monitoring
    system to the time at  which 95 percent of
    the corresponding flnal value Is reached as
    displayed  on tbe continuous monitoring sys-
    tem data  recorder.
      3.8 Operational  Test Period. A  minimum
    pertod of time  over which  a continuous
    monitoring system  it expected to  operate
    within  certain  performance  specifications
    without  unscheduled maintenance,  repair.
    or adjustment.
      SJ3 Transmlttance. The fraction of incident
    light that it transmitted through  an optical
    medium of Interest.
      8.10 Opacity. The fraction of Incident light
    that Is attenuated  by an optical medium of
    Interest. Opacity  (O)  and transmlttance  (T)
    »r» related a/ follows:
     • 3.11  Optical Density  A logarithmic meas-
    ure of  the amount of light thst It attenuated
    by  an  optical  medium  of  Interest. Optical
    density (D)  is related to the transmlttance
    and opacity as follows:
      D=-log,0T
      D= -log,, (1-0)
      S.1J  Peak  OptlcaJ  Response. The wave-
    length of maximum aensltlvljy. of the Instru-
    ment.
      3.13  Mean Spectral  Response. The wave-
    length which bisects  the  total area under
    The  curve  obtained  pursuant  to  paragraph
    • J.I.
      J.14  Angle of View. The maximum (total)
    angle  of radiation detection  by the photo-
    detector assembly of the analyzer.
      8. IS  Angle of  Projection. The  maximum
    ftotal) angle that contains  85 percent of
    tbe radiation projected from the lamp assem-
    bly of the analyeer.
                                                                        11-77
      «.!« F»thJ«nfth.  The d«pth  of effluent In
    OM Ught to**™ between the receiver and the
    transmitter of the  single-pass  transmlssom-
    •ter,  or  the depth  of effluent between the
    transceiver  and  reflector  of  a double-pass
    traosmla&ometer. Two pathlengths are refer-
    «nced by this specification'
      8.18.1 Monitor  Pithlength.  The  depth of
    •fluent at the Installed location of the con-
    tinuous monitoring system.
      3.165 Emission  Outlet  Pathlenjgth  The
    depth of effluent it  the location emissions are
    released to the atmosphere
      4. Installation Speclflcstlon,
      4.1  Location. The  tranamlssometer must
    be  located across » section of  duct or stack
    that  will  provide a paniculate matter flow
    through  the  optical volume  of  the trans-
    mlosometer that Is  representative of the par-
    Uculate  matter  flow through  the duct  or
    •tack. It Is recommended  that the monitor
    p*thlength or depth of effluent  for the trans-
    miseometer Include the  entire diameter of
    the duct  or  stack.  In Installations  using  a
    shorter pathlength, extra  caution  must  be
    u»ed  In determining  the measurement loca-
    tion representative  of the paniculate  matter
    flow through  the duct or  stack.
      4.1.1 The transmlasometer  location shall
    be  downstream from all paniculate  control
    equipment.
      4.1.2 The transmlssometer shall be  located
    as far from bends and obstructions as prac-
    tical.
      4.1.3  A  transmlssometer that Is  located
    In the duct or stack following a bend shall
    be  Installed  In  the  place denned  by  the
    bend  where posclble.
      4.1.4  .The tranamluometer should be In-
    stalled In an accessible location.
      4.1.5 When  required by the Administrator.
    the  owner  or operator  of a  source must
    demonstrate that the tranamlssometer Is lo-
    cated  In  a  section  of duct or stack where
    a representative paniculate matter distribu-
    tion  exists. The  determination shall be ac-
    complished by examining the opacity profile
    of the effluent at a series of positions across
    the duct or stack while the plant Is In oper-
    ation at maximum or reduced operating rates
    or by other tests, acceptable to the Adminis-
    trator.  .
      4.2 Slotted Tube. Installations that  require
    the UK of a slotted tube shall use a slotted
    tube  of  sufficient size and blackness so as
    not to Interfere with the free flow of  effluent
    through  the  entire  optical volume  of  the
    transmlssometer  or  reflect  light  Into  the
     transmlssometer photodetector.  Light  re-
    flections may be prevented by using black-
    ened  baffles within the slotted tube  to pre-
    vent the lamp radiation from Impinging upon
    the tube  walls, by  restricting the angle of
    projection of the light and the angle  of view
    of the photodetector assembly to less  than
    the cro&s-sectlonal  area of  the slotted tube.
    or by other methods The  owner  or operator
    must  show that the manufacturer  of  the
    monitoring  system  has   used appropriate
    methods  to  minimize light reflections for
    systems using slotted tubes.
      4.3  Data Recorder Output. The continuous
    monitoring system output shall  permit ex-
    panded display of  the  span  opacity on  a
    »t*ndard  0 to 100  percent scale.  Sine*  all
    opacity standards are based on the  opacity
    of the effluent exhausted to the atmosphere
    the system output  shall be based upon the
    emission outlet pathlength  and permanently
    recorded. Por  affected facilities whose moni-
    tor pathlength Is different  from the facility's
    emission outlet pathlength, a graph shall be
    provided with the  Instillation.to show the
    relationships between the  continuous moni-
    toring system recorded opacity based upon
    th* emission outlet pathlength  and the opac-
    ity of th» effluent  at the  analyzer  location
    .(monitor  pathlength). Teats  for  measure-
    ment of opacity  that are required  by this
    performance specification are based upon the
    

    -------
     iBonitor pathlength. The  graph an 'miry to
     eon nit  the data  r*oord«r  output  to  the
     •oojvor p»tnleneth -basis stall b* «*t»Aliah»d
     M follows :
    
       Joe (1-0,) -(U/U) k« (1-*)
     vhvre:
       0, = the opacity of the effluent based upon
             *r
      ^0, = the opacity of the effluent baaed upon
             lr
       l, = the etnluton outlet pathlength.
       l,= the monitor pathlength.
    
       B. Optical Design Specifications.
       The optical de«lgn specifications set forth
     In Section  8.1 shall be met In order for *
     measurement system  to  comply  with  the
     requirements of this method.
       6. Determination of Conformanee with De-
             cifications
     oenterllne of projection. Repeat the test in
     the vertical direction
       T. Continuous  Monitoring  BrTtem  Per-
     formance Specification!
       The  continuous  monitoring system  shall
     meet the performance specifications In Table
     1-1 to be considered acceptable under  this
     method
             1-1. — PerfnTmnnrr
      gn Speci
       o.l Tie
        .l Tie continuous monitoring system for
     measurement  of  opacity  ahall  be demon-
     Rrated to conform to the design speciflca-
     Uons Kt forth as follows:
       6.1.1   Peak Spectral  Response.  Tbe peak
     •pectrsl response  of the continuous  moni-
     toring systems shall occur between 500 run
     and 900 nm. Response at any wavelength be-
     low MO nm or above 700 nm shall  be le*s
     than 10 percent of the peak response  of the
     continuous monitoring system.
       6.1.2   Mean Spectral  Response. The mean
     spectral response of the continuous monitor-
     ing  system  shall occur between 600 nm and
     «PO  nm.
       «.l J Angle of View. The total angle of Tlew
     •hall be no greater than 6  degrees
       1.1.4  Angle of Projection  Tbe total angle
     •f pro>ection shall  be no greater Uxac 4 de-
     gress.
       6.2  Conformant* with  tbe  requirements
     of ae'ctlon  6.1 may be  demonstrated  by the
     owner  or operator of the  affected facility by
     testing each analyzer or by obtaining a cer-
     tificate of conformance from the Instrument
     manufacturer. The certificate must certify
     that at least one analyzer from each month's
     production was tested and satisfactorily met
     ill  applicable requirements. The certificate
     must state that the first  analyzer randomly
     sampled met all requirements of paragraph
     6 of this specification  If »ny of the require-
     ments  were  not  met,  the  certificate must
     show that  the entire month's auaJyzer pro-
     duction was resAmpled according to the mili-
     tary  standard  105D  sampling  procedure
     (VCL-STD-IOSD)  Inspection level H; was re-
     teeted  for  each  of the applicable require-
     ment*  under paragraph 6 of  this specifica-
     tion; and  was determined to be  acceptable
     under MTb-STD-lOSD procedures. The certifi-
     cate of conformsnce must anew the  results
     of each test  performed  for  the analyzers
     sampled during the month the analyxer be-
     ing installed wsj  produced.
       6J The general  test procedures to be fqj-
     lowed to demonstrate oonfonnance with Sec-
     tion  8  requirements are  given  as  follows
     (These  procedures  will not be applicable to
     all design*  and will require modification In
     some cases. Where analyzer  and optical de-
     sign Is certified by the manufacturer to con-
     form with  the  angle of view or angle of pro-
     jection specifications,  the respective  pro-
     c»dures may be omitted.)
       6.3.1  Spectral Response.  Obtain  spectral
     data for detector, lamp, and filter components
     t»«ed In the measurement system from their
     respective manuf scturers. .
       6.3.2 Angle  of View.  Bet the received  up
     as specified by the  manufacturer. Draw  an
     arc with radius of 3 meters. Measure the re-
     oelver response to a  small  (less  than  3
     centimeters) nac-dlre:tlona] lUht source »t
    •4-centimeter Intervals on the arc for 36 centi-
     meters on either side of the detector center-
     line. Repeat the test In the  vertical direction.
       6.3 3 Angle of Projection. Set the projector
     up at specified by  the manufacturer. Draw
     an arc with radius of 3 meters Using a small
     photoelectric  light  detector  (less  than  3
     centimeters), measure the  light Intensity at
     l-centlmeter  Intervals   on  the  arc  Tor  M
     centimeters on either side of the Ught source
     a. .Calibration «rror	  <3 pet opacity.1
     b Zwoartli (24 h)	  <5 Pet opaeliv '
     e.Callbrstlon drift (24 h)	  <2 pet oparltv i
     d. Respon* Urne	  10 s (maiimum)
     a. Operations! tot period	  1*3 h.
    
      ' Expressed as mm of absolute mean  value and the
     M pet confidence Interval of > series of tests.
    
       8.  Performance  Specification Test  Proce-
     dures. The following test procedures shall be
     osed to  determine conformance with the re-
     quirements of paragraph 7:
       t.l Calibration Error  and  Response Time
     T«st. These tests are to be performed prior to
     Installation of the  system on the stack and
     m«y  be  performed at  the  affected facility or
     at other locations provided that proper notlfl-
     oation  Is  given.  Set  up  and  calibrate  the
     measurement  system as specified  by  the
     manufacturer's written  Instructions for the
     monitor pathlength to  be used  In  the In-
     stallation.  Span the analyzer as specified In
     applicable  rubparts.
       8.1.1 Calibration Error Test. Insert a series
     of calibration  filters In  the  transmlasometer
     path at  the midpoint. A minimum of three
     calibration  filters  (low,  mid,  and   high-
     range) selected In accordance with the table
     under paragraph 2.1  and calibrated -within
     3 percent must be used  Make a total of five
     nonconsecutlve  readings   for e»ch   filter.
     Record   the  meas-urement   system  output
     readings in percent opacKv. (See Figure 1-1.)
      8.1.2 "System  Response  T?st.  Insert  the
     high-range  filter  In  the transmissometer
     path five tiroes and record the time required
     for the system  to respond to 85  percent of
     final zero and  hign-ringe filter values. (See
     Figure 1-2.)
      8.2  Field- Test  for Zero Drift and CeJlbra-
     tion Drift. Install the  continuous  monitoring
     syrtem on the affected  facility and perform
     the following alignments:
      8.2.1 Preliminary Alignments.  As soon as
     possible  after  Installation and once  a year
     thereafter  wbtn  the facility Is  not In opera-
     tion, perform the following  optical and lejc
     alignments:
      8.2.1.1  Optical Alignment.  Align the light
     beam from the trausml&someter upon the op-
     tical surface-s located across the effluent (I-*,
     the retroflector or pbotodflector  a> applica-
     ble)  in accordance with the  manufacturer's
     instructions.
      8-2.1.2  £ero Alignment. After  the trancmls-
     someter  has been optically aligned and tbe
     trsusmlisorneter mounting  Is  mechanically
     stable (I.e.. no  movement of the mounting
     due  to  thermal  contraction  of  the  stack.
     duct, etc.)  and a clean  stack condition has
     been  determined  by  a  steady tero opacity
     condition,  perform the zero  alignment. This
     alignment is performed by balancing the con-
     tinuous monitor  system  response so that any
     simulated  tero check  coincides with an ac-
     tual zero check performed across the moni-
     tor pathlength of th» clean  stack.
      8-2.1.3  Spr-a. Span the continuous monitor-
     Ing sy-tcm  at  the opacity specified In sub-
     paru and ofT&el  tbe tero setting  at least 10
     percent ol  span so that negative drift can  be
     quantified.
      8.2.2. Final Alignment*. Alter the prelimi-
    nary alignments buve been  completed and the
     affected  facility  liaj  been started up and
     reaches  normal  operating temperature, r«-
     checi;  the optical  alignment In  accordance
     with 8.2.1.1  of this specification" If the align-
     ment has shifted, realign  the optics, record
     »ny detectable ahlf t In the opacity measured
     by the system that can be attributed to the
     optical  realignment,  and notify the Admin-
     istrator. This  condition  may not  be objec-
     tionable If tbe a3ecte
    -------
                 Values for t.975
    
    2
    a
    •4
    5
    (1
    7
    
    »
    
    n «.S7S
    	 12 70K
    	 	 4 J03
    	 a is-
    	 2 776
    ... J 571
    	 7 *47
    	 2.J65
    	 2,100
    
    n
    10
    11
    1°
    13
    14
    15
    16
    
    
    '.975
    Z 242
    2. 228
    2 201
    2. 17fl
    2- 1W
    2 145
    2, J31
    
    
      B.2 DiU Analysis and Reporting
      8.2.1   Spectral   Response  Combine   the'
    tpwctra]  dtu  obtained ID accordance  with
    paragraph 6.3.1 to develop the effective spec-
    tral response curve of tbe transmlssometer.
    Report  the  wavelength at which the  pe»k
    response occurs, the wavelength at which the
    me in responif oceun, and  the maximum
    response at an;  wavelength  below  too nm
    aud above 700 am expressed  a* a percentage
                                                of the peak response a* required under para-
                                                praph 6.2.
                                                  9.13 Angle of View Using the data obtained
                                                In accordance with paragraph 6.3.2. calculate
                                                the response of the receiver as a function of
                                                viewing angle ID  tbe  horizontal  and vertical
                                                directions  (26 centimeters  of  arc  with  a
                                                radlvu of 3 meters equal  5  degrees).  Repcrt
                                                relative angle of view curves as required un-
                                                der paragraph 6-2.
                                                  8.2.3 Angle of Projection  TJilng the data
                                                obtained In accordance with paragraph 6.3.3,
                                                calculate the  res-sons*  of the photoelectric
                                                detector as a function of projection angle  Ln
                                                tbe horizontal and vertical directions. Report
                                                relative angle of projection curves as required
                                                under paragraph 6.2.
                                                  9.2.4 Calibration Error. Using the  data from
                                                paragraph  8.1  (ficure  1-1). subtract ihe
                                                kno«-n filter opacity  value  from  the  value
                                                shown by the  measurement  system for each
                                                of the 15 readings. Calculate the mean ind
                                                85 percent confidence  interval of tbe five dif-
                                                ferent values at each t«st filter value accord-
         Low
         Range 	I
         Span Value
                      opacity
                      	I opacity
    Mid
    Range  	I opacity
    High
    Range 	X opacity
    I
    Date of Test
                                             Location  of Test
               Calibrated  Filter
                                           Analyzer Reading
                                               I Opacity
                                    Differences
                                     '.  Opacity
     8_
    
     9_
    
    12.
    n
    
    
     15
    Vean  difference
    
    Confidence Interval
    
    
    Calibration error «
                            Low
                                                                      Hid
                                                                               High
                                Difference   + C.I.
     Low, nld or  high range
    ^Calibration  filter opacity - analyzer reiding
     Absolute
                       Figure  1-1.  C*litrat1or. Error Test
                                                           ing to equations 1-1 and 1-2. Report the si:tn
                                                           of tbe absolute meac dlJfrence  and the 95
                                                           percent confidence Interval for each of tbe
                                                          'three t«t filters
            Zero  Drift  Dstng  the  tero  opacity
     values measured  every 2< hours during  the
     field test (paragraph Si), calculate the dif-
     ferences between  the zero point after clein-
     Ing. aligning, and adjustment,  and the zero
     value 24  hours later Just prior  to detnjng.
     allfnlnp.   and  idjustmeot  CaJculate  the
     mean value of these  points  s  J the confi-
     dence Interval using equations 1-3 and 1-2
     Report the sum of the absoluu  mean value
     and the 95 percent confidence Interval.
       9.2.6 Calibration Drift.  Using  the spin
     value measured every  24 hours during  the
     field test.  calcul&t« the  differences between
     the span  ralue after cleaning, aligning, and
     adjustment of zero aad  span, and tbe spir.
     value  24 hours   later  Just after  clearjr.p
     aligning, and adjustment of zero and be.'cre
     adjustment of spen.  Calculate  the  mecr.
     value  of  these points and the  wmf.dt:-.cc
     Interval using equations  1-1 and 1-2. Report
     the sum of  the »bsolute mean value and the
     confidence Interval.
       921 Response Time. Using the data from
     paragraph  8.1, calculate the time Interval
     from filter Insertion to 95 percent of the final
     stable value for   all upscale  and dos-nsca'ie
     traverses. Report the mean  of the 10 upscale
     and dowrmcale test times.
       92A Operational Tsst  Period.  During the
     168-hour  operational test period,  the con-
     tinuous monitoring system  shall not require
     any corrective maintenance, repair, replace-
     ment, or adjustment other than  that clearer
     specified as required In the manufacturer's
     operation and maintenance manuals as rou-
     tine anci expected  during a  one-week period.
     If the continuous  monitoring system Is oper-
     ated  within the   specified performance pa-
     rameters  and  does not  require corrective
     maintenance. rtpaU. replacement, or adjust-
     ment  other than  as specified above during
     the  168-hour  test  period,,  the  operational
     test period shall have been successfully con-
     cluded Failure of the  continuous  monitor-
     ing system to meet tbes< requirements shall
     call  for a  repetition of  the 16S-houj  test
     period  Portions of the t«sts which  were sat-
     isfactorily completed need  not  be  repeated.
     Failure to meet any performance  specifics-
     tlon(s) shall call for  a repetition  of the
     one-weelc  operational  test  period  and that
     specific portion of the  tests  required  by
     parigrspb 8 related to demonstrating  com-
     pliance with  the failed  specification. All
     maintenince and adjustments required shall
     b«  recorded  Output readings sial!  be re-
     corded before and alter all adjustments.
     10  Re f err n CM
      10.1  "ExtxrimenUJ StittrUcs," Department
     of Commerce. National  Bureau of Standards
     Handbook   PI, 1963. pp.  S-31,  paragraphs
    
      l6i  '"Performance Specifications for Sta-
     tionary-Source Monitoring Systerci  for Gases
     and Visible  Emissions." Environmental Pro-
    tection  Agency.   Rewarcb  TTlaxiRle
     NX!, £PA-6iO/2-7«-01J, January 1974.
                                                                     11-79
    

    -------
                                                          Tot
       Spm
       04tt     Ze
       and    flef
       Tl«c   ivi
    1m Drift  ' (AfVr clein<»9 «"< wo
     •(tZtre)       but <*forc «[>4n in of a pollutant gas concentration  In  a
                     aource effluent.  Continuous monitoring sys-
                     tems consist of major subsystems as follows:
                       3.1.1 Sampling Interface—That portion of
                     an extractive continuous monitoring  system
                     that performs one or more  of the following
                     operations: acquisition, transportation, and
                     conditioning of a  sample of the source efflu-
                     ent  or that portion of an Ln-sltu continuous
                     monitoring system that protects the analyzer
                     from the effluent.
                       3.1.2 Analyzer—That portion of  the  con-
                     tinuous  monitoring system which senses the
                     pollutant gas and generates a signal  output
                     that Is  a function of the pollutant concen-
                     tration.
                       3.1.3 Data  Recorder—That portion  of the
                     continuous monitoring system that prorldes
                     a permanent record of the output  sign*! In
                     terms of concentration  units.
                       3.2 Span. The value  of pollutant concen-
                     tration at which  the  continuous  monitor-
                     Ing  system Is set to produce the maximum
                     data display output. The span shall  be set
                     at the concentration specified in each appli-
                     cable subpajt.
                       3.3 Accuracy  (Relative).  The degr«*  of
                     correctness  with   which   the  contlnuou*
                     monitoring system yields  the value  of fa*
                     concentration  of  a sample  relative  to tb«
                     value given  by  a define*! reference method.
                     TJils accuracy U expressed  in terms of error.
                     which k  the dlffareoce between  the  paired
                     concentration measurement* expressed a* a
                     fwoentage of the  m»an reUreno* value.
        1.4 Oallbr»tl6n  «rror. Tbe difference  b«-
      t»»en  the  pollutant  concentration  Indl-
      e»ted by  the continuous monitoring system
      •cd the  known concentration  of  the test
      (M mixture.
        1.6 Zero Drift. The change In the  conttnu-
      ous monitoring system output over a stated
      period of time of normal continuous opera-
      tion  when  the pollutant concentration  at
      tt» time  for the measurements is zero.
        3.8 Calibration  Drift. The  change  in  the
      continuous monitoring system output over
      a rteted  time period of normal continuous
      operations  when  the  pollutant concentra-
      tion at the time of the measurements  Is the
      •tone XDOWTJ upscale value ~
        i.7 Response Time.  Tbe  time  Interval
      from a step change in  pollutant concentra-
      tion at the Input  to the continuous moni-
      toring system to the time at which 85 per-
      cent of  the corresponding  final   value  is
      reached   as displayed  on  the  continuous
      monitoring system d»ta recorder.
        1.8 Operational  Period. A minimum period
      of  time over which a  measurement system
      I* expected  to  operate within  certain  per-
      formance  specifications  without  unsched-
      uled maintenance, repair, or adjustment
        3.9 Stratification. A  condition identified
      toy  a difference In  excess of 10  percent be-
      tween the average concentration in  the duct
      or itack and the concentration at any  point
      more than 1.0 meter from the duct or stack
      wall.
       4. Installation  Specifications   Pollutant
      continuous   monitoring systems (SO,  and
      NO,) shall  be Installed at a sampling loca-
      tion where measurements ?-«" be made which
     are directly representative  (4.1), or  which
     can be corrected so as  to  be  representative
      (4.2) of the total emissions from  the affected
     facility  Conformance with this requirement
     ahall be  accomplished  as follows:
       4.1 Effluent gases may  be assiamed to be
     •onstratlned If a sampling location  eight or
     more stack diameters (equivalent diameters)
     downstream of any  air  in-leakage Is se-
     lected. This  assumption and data correction
     procedures under  paragraph 4.2.1 may not
     be applied  to sampling locations upstream
     of an air  preheater in  a «te&m  generating
     facility under Subpart  D of this part. For
     •ampllng  locations  where affluent gases are
     either  demonstrated  (4.3)  or may  be as-
     mmed to be nonstratlfied  (eight diameters).
     a point (extractive systems)  or path  (In-sltu
     •ystems)   of average concentration  may  be
     monitored.
       4.3 For  sampling locations where  effluent
     Cases cannot  be assumed  to  be nonstratl-
     flsd (less than eight diameters) or have been
     ahown under paragraph 4J  to be stratified,
     results obtained must be consistently repre-
     sentative  (e.g. a point of average concentra-
     tion  may  shift with load  changes) or the
     data generated by  sampling at a point (ex-
     tractive  systems) or across  a  path  (In-sltu
     lystems) must be corrected  (4.2.1 and 4.2.2)
     •o as to be representative of the  total emls-
     aloni from  the  affected facility. Conform-
     ance with  this requirement may be «ccom-
     pllahed in either of the following ways:
       4.2.1 Installation of a diluent  continuous
     monitoring system  (O. or CO. as  applicable)
     IB  accordance  with  the  procedures under
     paragraph  4.2 of  Performance  Specification
     I  of this  appendix. If the  pollntant and
     diluent monitoring  systems are  not of the
     •ame type  (both extractive or both In-situ),
     ttn extractive system must use .  multipoint
    probe.
      4.3.2 Installation - of   extractive pollutant
     monitoring systems using multipoint sam-
    pling probes  or lo-situ pollutant monitoring
    •Totems that sample or view emissions which
    ar» eonrtite-otly  representative of the total
    emisaaoru  for the entire cross «ectlon.  The
    Administrator  may require data to be  tub-
                                                                      11-80
    

    -------
      mlttad to  demonstrate  that  the
      aaxnpltd  or vl»w»d  art  con*l»t*ntly  r«pr*-
      MOUClTe for aeveral typical facility  procw*
      operating conditions.
       4-3 The owner or opermtor may perform a
      traverse to  characterize any atratlncatlon or
      effluent gases that might exut la a stack or
      duct. If no  stratification  Is present, sampling
      procedures  under paragraph 4.1 may be ap-
      plied even though th* eight dLameter criteria
      b not met.
       4.4 When tingle point sampling probes for
     •xtractlT* lyatama ire Installed  within tbe
      •tack or duct under paragraph! 4.1 and 4 J.I.
      tb« aampl* may not be extracted it any point
      lesa  than 1.0 meter from the  itack or duct
      vail.  Multipoint aainpllng  probes Installed
      under paragraph 4.2.2 may be located  it aJiy
      points necessary to.obtain consistently rep-
      resentative samples.
      5. Continuous  Monitoring System Perform-
      ance Specifications.
        The continuous  monitoring  system shall
      me«t tbe performance specifications In Table
      3-1 to be considered acceptable under'tots
      method.
                                    2-1.—Performance fpeciflcatiom
                                                                   Specification
     I. Accoracv l	,...	.	  <3) pet of th» mean value of tbe reference method teet
                                                     data.
     ?. Calibrates error >	_	  S 5 pel of tacb (M pel, 90 pel) calibration gas minors
                                                     value.
     S. Zero drl/i (2 b) '	__	  i pet of span
     4. Zero drm (34 h)'	     Do.
     i. Calibration drift (2 h) i	     Do.
     «. Calibrmtloa drift (24 b)'	_	  Z-5 pet. of jpan
     7. Response dme	.	  IS mln maximum.
     8. Operational p«rlod					  158 h minimum.
      i Expressed u sum of abaoluu mean nlat plus 94 pet
       6.  Performance Specification Test  Proce-
     dures. The following Kst procedures shall be
     used  to determine  conformance  with  the
     requirements  of paragraph  5. For  NO,  an-
     requiremenu  of paragraph  S. For  NOi  an-
     alyzer*  that oxidize  nitric  oxide  (NO) to
     nitrogen dioxide  (NO.),  the response time
     test under paragraph 6~.3 of this method shall
     be performed  using  nitric oxide  (NO) span
     gas. Other tests for NO, continuous monitor-
     ing systems under paragraphs 6.1 and 6.2 and
     all tests for sulfur dioxide  systems shall be
     performed using  the pollutant span gas spe-
     cified by each s~ubpart.
       61 Calibration Error Test  Procedure.  Set
     up and  calibrate the  complete  continuous
     monitoring  system according to tbe manu-
     facturer's wrlten Instructions. This may be
     accomplished  either In the laboratory or In
     the field.
       6.1.1  Calibration  Gas  Analyses. Triplicate
     analyses of the gas mixtures shall be per-
     formed  within two weeks prior to use  using
     Reference Methods 6 for SO.  and 7  for NOi.
     Analyze each callbr-tlon  gis  nurture  (50%,
     501,} and record the results on the example
     sheet shown In Figure 3-1. Each sample test
     result must be within 20 percent  of the aver-
     aged  result or the tests shall be repeated.
     This  step may b* omitted for non-extractive
     monitors There dynamic calibration gas mix-
     tures are not used (6.1.2).
      6.1.2   Calibration  Error  Test  Procedure.
     Make a  total of  15 nonconsecutlve measure-
     ment* by alternately using zero gas and each
     :ollt>eratlon gts  mixture concentration (e.g..
     3<-t,  50%, OT., B0%.  50%,  90%.  50%, 0%,
     •tc.). For nonextractlve continuous monitor-.
    lag systems, this test procedure may be per-
    formed by using two or more calibration gas
    cells  whose  concentrations  are certified  by
    the manufacturer to be functionally equiva-
    lent to these gas concentrations. Convert the
    continuous monitoring system  output read-
    Ings to ppm  and record the results on  the
    example sheet shown In Figure 2-2.
      62 Field Teat  for Accuracy  (Relative),
    Zero Drift, and Calibration Drift. Install and
    operate the continuous monitoring tystem In
    accordance with the manufacturer's written
    Instruction* and drawings u follows:
      8.2.1 Conditioning Period. Offset the zero
    •etting at least 10  percent of the span  ao
    that negative  zero  drift can be  quantified.
    Operate  tne sjttem lor an  Initial 168-hour
    conditioning  period  In   normal  operating
    manner.
      833 Operational T«wt Period. Crptrat* th»
    continuous monitoring irrrtem  for an  addl-
    CDOfldenct (altml of» series of.tests.
      tlonal  168-hour  period  retaining  the cero
      offset. The system shall  monitor the source
      effluent  at  all  times  except when  being
      zeroed, calibrated, or bacxpurged.
        6.2.2.1  Field Test for Accuracy  (Relative).
      For continuous monitoring systems employ-
      Ing extractive sampling, the probe tip for the
      continuous monitoring system ind tbe probe
      tip for the Reference Method sampling train
      should be placed at adjacent locations In the
      duct.  For NO, continuous  monitoring sys-
      tems.  msJse  27  NOT  concentration measure-
      ments, divided  Into nine sets, using the ap-
      plicable reference method. No more  than one
      set of  tests,  consisting of three Individual
      measurements,  shall be  performed in any
      one nour. All  Individual measurements  of
      each set shall  be performed concurrently.
      or  within a three-minute Interval  and  the
      results averaged  For SO, continuous moni-
      toring systems, make nine SO. concentration
      measurements using the applicable reference
      method.  No  more than  one  measurement
      shall be performed In any one hour. Record
      the reference method test data and  the con-
      tinuous monitoring  system  concentrations
      on  the example data sheet siown ID Figure
      2-3.
       6.2.2.2 Field Test for Zero Drift and  Cali-
      bration Drift. For extractive systems, deter-
      mine the values given by zero and span gas
      pollutant concentrations  at two-hour Inter-
      vals until 15  sets of  data are  obtained. For
      nonextractlve measurement systems, tbe zero
      value may be determined by mechanically
      producing a  zero  condition that  provides a
      system checic of the analyzer Internal mirrors
      and all  electronic circuitry  including the
      radUtlon  source and detector  assembly or
      by  inserting  three or more  calibration gas
      cells nnd computing tbe zero point from the
     upscale measurements.  If this  latter tech-
     nique U used, a graph(s) must be  retained
     by  the owner or operator for each measure-
     ment system  that shows the relr.tlonship be-
     tween  the upscale measurements and  the
     tero point. The »pan  of the »73tem  ahall be
     checked by using  a calibration ga» cell cer-
     tified by the manufacturer to be function-
     ally equivalent to 50 percent of span  concen-
     tration. Record th» zero and span me&sure-
     menta  (or the computed  zero drift)  on the
     example  data sheet  shown  In  Figure 3-4.
     The two-hour periods over which measure-
     ments are conducted need  not be consecutive
     but may not overlap. All  measurements re-
     quired  under  tixli paragraph may  b*  con-
     ducted concumnt vltb  test* undtr  p*ra-
     jraph 8.2.2.1.
        8.3.2.3 Adjustment*.  Zero aod  calibration
      corrections and adjustment* an allowed only
      at 34-hour Intervals or at rucb  ahorter In-
      tervals as  the manufacturer'a  written In-
      struction*  specify.  Automatic   corrections
      made  by the-  measurement system  without
      operator Intervention or initiation are allow-
      able at any time. During the entire 163-hour
      operational te»t period,  record  on  the ex-
      ample sheet abown In Figure 3-6 tbe values
      given  by zero and  ipan  gaj  pollutant  con-
      centrations before and after adjustment, at
      24-hour Intervals.
        B2 Field Test for Re*pon*e Time.
        6.3.1  Scope  of Test. Dae the entire continu-
      ous monitoring system as Installed, Including
      aample transport  lines  If used.  Flow  rates.
      line diameters, pumping rates, pressures (do
      not allow tbe  pressurized  calibration gas to
      change the  normal operating pressure In the
      sample line), etc.. shall be  at tbe nominal
      values for normal  operation  as  specified l»
      tbe manufacturer's written Instructions. V
      the analyzer Is used to sample more than one
      pollutant source (stack), repeat Uib test for
      each sampling point.
       6.3.2 Response  Time  Te*t  Procedure.  In-
      troduce zero gas  into tbe  continuous moni-
     toring  system sampling Interface  or as close
     to the sampling Interface  as  possible. When
      the system output reading  has stabilized.
     switch quickly to  a known concentration of
     pollutant gas. Record the time from concen-
      tration switching to 95 percent of final stable
      response.  For  non-extractive monitors,  the
      highest available calibration  gas  concentra-
     tion shall be  switched  Into and  out of the
     sample  path  and   response  times recorded.
     Perform  this test sequence three (3) umas.
    • Record  the  results  of each  test  on  the
     example sheet shown In Figure  2-0.
       7. Calculations. Data  Analysis and  Rcr>ort-
     ing.        •
       7.1 Procedure for determination  of mean
     values and confidence- intervals.
       7.1.1 The  mean  value  of  a  data set is
     calculated according  to equation 2-1.
    
    
                    Z-^Sx
                        n '-I   '  Equation  '!.- 1
     where:
       X|=r absolute value of tbe measurements,
       ! = sum of the Individual values,
       5"= mean value, and
       n = number of data points,
    
       7.1.2 The  85 percent  confidence Interval
     (two-sided)  U calculated according to equa-
     tion 2-2:
                                  Equation 2-2
    •where:
        Zx,—sum of all data points,
        t.rrj = t, — a/2, and
       C.I.«j = 9S  percent  confidence  interval
              estimate  of  the  average  mean
              value.
                  Values for V975
               n
               5:
                                '. 874
               11	
               14	:..j..~
               14	
               It		
                                4.903
                                lie
                                S.774
                                1471
                                ivn
                                1364
    12S2
    129
    1201
    2. 179
    Z 160
                                3.131
      Tat  value*  in  this table are already eor-
    r*ct*d  for n-1  d««r»»» of trwriom.  Use n
                                                                      11-81
    

    -------
     •qua!  to  tt» number  of •ample*  e*  ****
     point*.
       12  Data AnalyaU UJd Reporting.
       7J.I  Accuracy (Relative). For each of the
     nice .-tr^rcic-c mthotf test points, determine
     the average pollutant concentration reported
     by tie conUnuoui monitoring system. These
     average concentration*  Khali b« determined
     from the continuous monitoring system data
     recorded under 7.2JJ by Integrating or aver-
     aging the pollutant concentrations over each
     3f the time intervals concurrent with  each
     reference method testing period. Before pro-
     ceeding to the next step, determine the basis
     (wet or dry) of the continuous monitoring
     system data »"* reference  method test  data
     concentration*. If the  baits  trt  not  con-
     sistent, apply a moisture correction to either
     reference m«thod concentrations or the  con-
     tinuous monitoring system  concentrations
     as appropriate.  Determine the  correction
     factor by moisture test*  concurrent with the
     reference method testing periods. Report the
     moisture test method and the correction pro-
     cedure employed. For each of the nine test
     runs determine the difference for  each test
     run by subtracting the  respective reference
     method tat concentrations (ua< average of
     each  set of three me -urements  for NOi)
     from the continuous monitoring system inte-
     grated  or  averaged  c.  >centratlons.  Using
     these data,  compute the  mean difference and
     the 95 percent confidence Interval of the dif-
     ferences (equations 2-1  and 3-2).  Accuracy
     Is reported  a^ the rum of the absolute value
     of the  mean difference  and the 95 percent
     confidence  Interval  of  the differences  ex-
     pressed u a percentage  of the mem refer-
     ence  method value. UK the  example sheet
     shown  In Figure 3-3
       "122   Calibration Error.  Using  the  data
     from paragraph 6.1. subtract the measured
     pollutant concentration determined   under
     paragraph 6.1.1 (Figure 3-1) from the value
     shown by the continuous monitoring  system
     for each of  the five  readings  at each con-
     centration measured under 8.1 J (Figure 2-2).
     Calculate the mean of these difference values
     and the 85  percent confidence Intervals ac-
     cording to equations 2-1  and 2-2. Report the
     calibration  error  (the sum of  the  absolute
     value of the mean difference and the 95 per-
     cent confidence Interval) as a percentage of
     each  respective  calibration  gas concentra-
     tion. Use example sheet shown In Figure 2-2.
      7.2.3  Zero Drift (2-hour). Using the zero
     concentration values  measured each  two
     hours during the field test, calculate the dif-
     ference* between oon*6cuuv» two-hour read-
    lap «ipres»*d In ppm. Calculate the  mem
    difference and tin confidence Interval
      equation* 1-1 and 3-3. He port the r»ro drift
      u  the sum of the absolute  mean  value and
      U>« confidence  Interval at  a  percentage  of
      •pan.  Us* example sheet shown  In  Figure
      3-4.
       7.3.4   Zero Drift (24-hour). Using the rero
      concentration  values  measured  ever?   34
      hours during the field test, calculate the dif-
      ferences between  the tero point  after  rero
      adjustment and the iero value 24 hours later
      just prior to sero adjustment. -Calculate the
      mean value of these  points and the confi-
      dence Interval  using equations 2-1 and 2-2.
      Report the cero drift  (the rum of  the abso-
      lute mean and confidence interval) as a per-
      centage of span. Use example sheet abown  In
      Figure 3-5.
       7.2.5  Calibration Drift  (2-hour).  Using
      the calibration values obtained at  two-hour
      Intervale during the field test, calculate the
      differences  between  consecutive  two-hour
      readings  expressed  as ppm.  These   values
      should  b* corrected  for  the corresponding
      rero drift during that two-hour period. Cal-
      culate  the mean  and confidence Interval  of
      these corrected difference values using equa-
      tions 2-1 and 2—2.  Do not use the differences
      between  non-consecutive  readings.  Report
      the calibration  drift a; the sum of  the abso-
     lute mean and  confidence Interval  as a per-
     centage of span. Use the example sheet ahown
     In Figure 2-4.
       7.2.6  C-llbratlon  Drift  {24-hour).  .Using
     the   calibration  values measured  every  24
     hours durinz the field test, calculate the dif-
     ferences between  the calibration concentra-
     tion reading  after zero and  calibration ad-
     justment, and the calibration concentration
     reading 24 hours later  after zero adjustment
     but  before calibration adjustment.  Calculate
     the  mean value of these differences and the
     confidence Interval  using equations 2-1 and
     2-2. Report the  calibration  drift (the sum of
     the  absolute mean and confidence  Interval)
     as a percentage of span. Use  the example
     aheet shown in Figure 2-5.
       7.2.7  Response  Time.  Using the  charts
     from paragraph 6.3, calculate the  time  inter-
     val from  concentration switching to 95 per-
     cent  to the nriai stable value for all upscale
     and  downscale tests. Report the mean of the
     three upscale test tunes and the mean of the
     three downscale test  times.  The two  aver-
     age times should not differ by more than 15
     percent of the slower time. Report the slower
     time as the system response time. Use the ex-
     ample sheet shown in Figure 2-8.
       7.2.8 Operational Test Period. During the
     Ifr8-bour  performance  and  operational test
     period,  the continuous monitoring system
     ahall not require any corrective maintenance.
    repair, replacement, or adjustment other **•"
     that clearly specified  a* required In the op-
     eration and maintenance manuals as routine
     end  erpect*d during  a one-week period. If
     the continuous monitoring system operates
     within the  specified performance parameters
     and does not require corrective maintenance,
     repair, replacement or adjustment other than
     as specified above during the 168-hour test.
     period, th» operational period will be success-
     fully  concluded.  Failure of the  continuous
     monitoring system to  meet this  requirement
     shall call for a repetition of the 168^hour test
     period. Portion* of the test which were satis-
     factorily  completed need  not  be  repeated.
     Failure  to  meet any  performance  specifica-
     tions  shall  call  for  a  repetition  of the one-
     weelc performance test period and that por-
     tion  of the  testing which is related  to the
     failed specification All maintenance and ad-
     justments required ahall  be recorded.  Out-
     put readings shall  be recorded  before  ana
     after all adjustments.
       8. References.
       8.1 "Monitoring  InstrumenUtlon for  the
     Measurement of Sulfur Dioxide In Stationary
     Source Emissions," Environmental Protection
     Agency,  Research Triangle Park, N.C.,  Feb-
     ruary 1873.
       82 "Instrumentation  for  the  Determina-
     tion of Kitrogen Oxides Content  of Station-
     ary  Source  Emissions,"  Environmental  Pro-
     tection Aginc7, Research Triangle Park. N.C.,
     Volume  1,  APTD-OS47.  October  1871;  Vol-
    ume  2, AJTD-0942,  January 1973.
      3.3 "Experimentil Statistics," Departm-nt
    of Commerce, Handbook 91,  1863. pp. 3-31.
     paragraphs  3—3.1.4.
      8.4 "Performance  Specifications  for  Sta-
    tionary-Source Monitoring Systems for Gases
    and  Visible  Emissions," Environmental  Pro-
    tection Agency. Research Triangle Park.  N.C..
    EPA-650/3-74-013, January 1974..
                                                                                                       1-1.  fcvlflH •< t*l**r*t*M IM Mnvr
    

    -------
                Calibration  Gas  Mixture DaU (Frm Figure 2-1)
                Mid  (505)  	ppn        High (901) 	ppra
              Cal ibration f.as
    Run 1    Concentration,ppm
               Measurement  System
                 Reading, ppn
    Differences,
    4
    5_
    6
    7_
    8
    9_
    10
    n
    _[2_
    13
    15
    Mean difference
     onfidence  interval
    Calibration error
                                                                      Hid    High
     	Near Difference   * C.I.	   ,..
    Average Cal ibrat:or> Gas Concentration        	I 	  f
     Calibration gas  concentration -  measurement system reading
    'Absolute value
                         Figure 2-2.   Calibration Error Determination
                            Ifitrmct
          hu
          •M
                  i  !
                                                      "^	"z   «,
                                                                              (wi
                    **ICf WtA»d
                     (».)	
                                          (",) • 1.
                                                               HMn of
                                                               IM llfftrmcti
                                                     • I ISC •	I (Mj) » 	f
     ti?l«1* Mtf report a*tJ
                              2-].  
    -------
    nil
    Mt
             *•*!•   EM!    lit
                                           •rift     Son
                                                            tf."
                                                            erf ft
    Zrr ^m •  [heii Jerxi yrift"
    CjHbritien Drift • [*te* S^*n trifi-
    «*6iolutt Viluf.
                                                          S?«nj « 1C'5 •
                                                           I [SP«n) i 16
                       f'.Jurc 2-4.  2fro *f«: Cilierdticn Crif;  (2
      Date                       Zero                  Span            Calibration
      and            Zero        Drift               Reading              Drift
      Time        Reading     (iZero)      (After zero  adjustment)     (aSpan)
     Zero  Drift « [Mean 7ero Drift*	+ C.I.  (Zero)
    
                       i  [Instnmer.t Span] x ICO • 	
    
            ation Drift «  [Kean Span Drift*	
                                                        + C.I.  (Spsn)
                      «  [Instrument  Span] x TOO «
     * Absolute value
                     Figure 2-5.  Zero  »nd Calibration Drift  (24-hour)
                                              11-84
    

    -------
    D*t« of Ttit
    Spin (Us Concentration
    Aiwlyter Sp*n Sitting
    Upsole
    
    Avenge
    
    ttownscale
    -
    Avenge
    
    
    
    1 	
    2 	
    3 	
    OOB.
    ppn
    _»»eonds
    _ieeonds
    _*econds
    upscs.lt response seconds
    1 	
    2 	
    3 	
    downscile
    System average response -tlite (slower
    Mevlatlon from slower m \
    system iverige response
    _»econds
    _*econds
    _»econds
    response 	 seconds
    t^"*) " seconds .
    »vera«e upscale minus tveraqe downscale 1 _ ,nn, .
    
    
                              Figure 2-6.   Response
                                 — Performance
     spclcauonsadspeclficton  test proce-
     dures (or monitors of CO, and O, from sta-
     tionary sources.
       1. Principle and I Applicability.
       1.1  Principle.  Effluent gases »re  continu-
     ously sampled and  are  analyzed for carbon
     cloxlde or oxygen by » continuous monitor-
     ing system. Tests of the system are performed .
     during a minimum operating period  to deter-
     mine  zero  drift, calibration drift,  and  re-
     sponse time characteristics.
       1.2  Applicability. This performance speci-
     fication Is  applicable to evaluation of con-
     tinuous monitoring systems for measurement
     of carbon dioxide or oxygen. These specifica-
     tions contain test procedures. Installation re-
     quirements, and data  computation proce-
     dures for evaluating the acceptability of the
     continuous monitoring  systems subject to
     approval  by  the Administrator. Sampling
     may Include either extractive or  non-extrac-
     tive (In-sttu) procedures.
       2. Apparatus.
       2.1  Continuous  Monitoring  System  for
     Carbon Dioxide or Oxygen.
       22  Calibration Oas Mixtures.  Mixture of
     known concentrations of carbon dioxide or
     oxygen In  nitrogen or air. Mldrange and 90
     percent of  span carbon dioxide or oxygen
     concentrations are required. The 90 percent
     of span gas mixture Is to be used to set and
     check the  analyzer span and  Is  referred to
     ao  span g«J.  For oxygen analyzers, IT the
     span  Is higher than 21 percent O,. ambient
     air may b« used la place of the 90 percent of
     span   calibration gai   mixture. Triplicate
     analyses of  the gas mixture (except ambient
     Kir)  thai]  be performed within  two  weeki
     prior to us*  using Reference  Method  3 of
     this part.
      2-3 Zero Oas. A gas containing less »-h»n 100
     ppm of cartoon dioxide or oxygen.
      2.4  Data Recorder. Analog chart recorder
     or other suitable device with Input roltage
    range compatible with analyzer system  out-
     puc. The  resolution of  the  recorder's  data
     output shall be sufficient to allow  completion
     of the test procedures within this specifica-
     tion.
      3. Dgflnlttons.
      (.1  Continuous Monitoring  Sjrtem.  Th*
     Local equipment required for  the  determina-
     tion of carton dioxide or ozrjeQ In a flr»n
     source effluent. The system consists of three
     major subsystems:
       3.1.1 Sampling Interface. That portion of
     the continuous monitoring system that per-
     forms one or more of  the following  opera-
     tions: delineation,  acquisition, transporta-
    tion, and  conditioning of a sample  ot  the
     source effluent or protection  of the analyzer
     from the  hostile aspect*  of the sample or
     aource environment.
       3.1.2 Analyzer. That  portion of the  con-
     tinuous  monitoring system which senses the
     pollutant gas and generates a signal output
     that Is a function  of the pcllutant concen-
     tration.
       3.1.3 Data Recorder.  That portion  of  the
     continuous monitoring  system that provides
     a  permanent record of  the output signal In
     terms of concentration units.
       3.2 Span. The value of oxygen or carbon di-
     oxide coi.eentra.tl3n at which the continuous
     monitoring system  Is set  that produces  the
     maximum  data display  output. For the pur-
     poses of  this method, the  span shall  be aet
     no less than 1.S to 2.S times the normal car-.
    • bon dioxide or normal oxygen concentration
     in the stack gas of the affected facility.
       3.3 Mldrsnge. The value ot oxygen or car-
     bon dioxide concentration that Is representa-
     tive of the normal  conditions  In  the stack
     gas of. the  affected facility at typlcil operat-
     ing rates.
       3.4 Zero  Drift.  The change In the contin-
    uous monitoring system output over a  stated
    period of time of normal  continuous  opera-
     tion when  the carbon dioxide or oxygen con-
     centration  at the time for the measurements
    Is  zaro.
      3J Calibration  Drtft. The  change In  the
     continuous monitoring system output  over a
    stated time period of normal  continuous  op-
    eration when the carbon  dioxide or oxygen
    continuous monitoring  system Is  measuring
    the concentration of span gas.
      8.8 Operational Test  Period.  A minimum
    period of time over which the continuous
    monitoring  system   Is expected to" operate
    within  certain  performance  specifications
    without unscheduled maintenance,, repair, or
    adjustment.         .      •
      8.7 Response time. The ttmt Interval from
    a (Up change In  concentration  at thj Input
    to Ule continuous monitoring system  to  Uu
         at wild 95  pcrant of th* corrwpond-
     tot fln*' v*10* * dUplaywd ce tte oocttnuoos
     SBOoJtorinc system data recorder.
       4. Installation Specification.
       Oxygen or carbon dioxide continuous mon-
     itoring systems1 shall b« Installed at a loca-
     tion where measurements are directly repre-
     a*ntattve of  the total effluent  trom  the
     sdlect«d facility or representative of the same
     •fluent sampled by a SO, or NO, continuous
     monitoring  STstem.  This requirement shall
     b*  compiled, with 07  use of applicable  re-
     quirements Ln Performance Specification 3 of
     t>M» appendix aa follows:
       4.1 Installation  of  Oxygen or Carbon  D1-
     "onde  Continuous Monitoring  Synems Not
     TJsed to Convert Pollutant D»ta. A sampling
     location shall b* selected In accordance with
    . toe  procedures  under • paragraphs 4.2.1  or
    . 4.2.2. or Performance, Specification 2 of this
     appendix,        -
       4.2 Installation of  Oxygen or Carbon  Di-
     oxide Continuous  Monitoring Systems Used
     to Convert Pollutant Continuous Monitoring
     System- Data to Units of Applicable Stand-
     ards. The diluent continuous monitoring sys-
     tem (oxygen or carbon dioxide) shall be  In-
     stalled at a sampling location where measure-
     ments that <**" b« made are representative of
     the  effluent  gases sampled  by the pollutant
     continuous monitoring system(s). Conform-
     ajace with this requirement may be accom-
     plished In any of the following ways:
       4.2.1 The sampling location for the diluent
     system shalrbe zwar the sampling location for
     the pollutant continuous monitoring system
     such that  the same approximate point (s)
     (extractive systems)  or path  (In-sltu  sys-
     tems)  In the cross section Is sampled  or
     viewed.
       4.2.2 The diluent and pollutant continuous
     monitoring systems may be  Installed at dif-
     ferent locations If the effluent gases at both
     sampling locations are noastratlfled as deter-
     mined under paragraphs 4.1  or  4.3, Perform-
     ance  Specification 2  of *>MT appendix  and
     there Is no la-leakage occurring between the
     two  sampling locations. If the effluent gases
     are stratified at either location, the proce-
     dures  under paragraph 4.2.2,  Performance
     Specification 2 of this appendix  shall be used
     for Installing continuous monitoring systems
     at that location.
       6,  Continuous Monitoring System Perform-
     ance Specifications.
       The  continuous  monitoring  system  «>i«J'
     meet the performance specifications In Tails
     3-1  to be considered  acceptable under t&Li
     method.
       6.  Performance  Specification  Teat Proce-
     dures.
       The following test procedures  snail be used
     to determine conformance with the require-
     ments of paragraph 4. Due to the wide varia-
     tion  existing In analyzer designs and princi-
     ples  of  operation, these- procedures are not
     applicable to all analyzers. Where this occurs.
     alternative  procedures, subject to the ap-
     proval  of the Administrator, may be em-
     ployed. Any such alternative procedures must
     fulfill the same purpos« (verify response,
     drift, snd accuracy)  as the following proce-
     dures,  and must  clearly demonstrate  oon-
     fonnance with  specifications In Table 8-1.
    
       6.1 Calibration Check. Establish a cali-
    bration curve  for the continuous moal-
    •torlng system Using zero,  mldrange, and
    span concentration gas mixtures. Verify
     that the resultant curve of analyzer read-
    Ing  compared with the calibration  gaf
    value Is consistent with the expected re-
    tponse curve ts described by the analyzer
    manufacturer. If the expected response
    curve  la not  produced, additional cali-
    bration r*<  measurements shall be m*d«,
    or additional  itepa undertaken to vertt?
                                                                    11-85
    

    -------
    the accuracy ol the response curve of the
    analyzer.
      6.2 Field Test for Zero Drift and Ca.11-
    bratic:1.  Drift,  lasuil and operate  the
    continuous monitoring system in accord-
    ance with the manufacturer's written in-
    structions and drawings as follows:
      TABU: 3-1.—Performance  ipecificalinns
           Pimettr
                               Sped/lotion
    J. Zero drift f? h)'	  <0.« pet Oi or COi.
    2. Zen drill 	  <0.i pet Otor CO,.
    i. CiUbridoo drift (I M'..  <0.4 pet 0: or COv
    i. C«llbr»non rtnfi (24 b) i.  <0-S pel O: or COi.
    A. Operauonal rxnod	  1* b minimum.
    5. Rejpontt u:ne	_...  JOmm. •
    
      > £rprrss*e mem and  confidence Intern! of
    these corrected difference values usln? equa-
    tions 3-1  and 3-2. Do not use the differences
    between  non-consecutive  readings.  Record
    the  sum  ol  the absolute  mean  and  cot,.':-
    dence  interval  upon  the data sheet  shot™
    In Firure  3-1.
      7-2.4 Calibration DrlU (24-hour). Using the
    calibration values measured every  24 Sours
    during  the  Qeld test, calculate the  d'.fer-
    ences between  the calibration  concentration
    reading after zero and  calibration adjust-
    ment snd the calibration concentration read-
    Ing 24  hours  later after zero adjustment but
    before calibration adjustment.  Calculate the
    mean value of these differences and the con-
    fidence Interval using equations 3-1 and  3-2.
    Record  the eum of  the  absolute mean  tnd
    confidence interval on the data sheet abown
    In Figure 3-2.
      7.2.5 Operational Test Period. Dujlng the
    168-hour  performance and operations:  test
    period,  the  continuous  monitoring  sys:;m
    anall not  receive any corrective maintenance.
    repair,  replacement,  or  adjustment other
    than that clearly specified as required In the
    manufacturer's  written operation and main-
    tenance  manual? us  rojtlne  and eipected
    during a  one-week period. If the continuous
    monitoring system operates  wlUiin the speci-
    fied performance parameters and does net re-
    quire corrective maintenance, repair, replice-
    men; or adjustment  o:ner  than as speclS-d
    above  during the 168-hour test period, the
    operational period will be  successfully con-
    cluded. Failure of the continuous monitoring
    system  to meet  this requirement shall  cz'.l
    for a repetition of the 168  hour test period.
    Portions of the test which were satisfactory
    completed need not be repeated.  Failure to
    meet any performance  specifications  shall
    call for a repetition of the one-week perform-
    ance test period and that portion of the test-
    ing which Is related to the failed  specifica-
    tion. All  maintenance and adjustments re-
    quired  shall be recorded.  Output readings
    shall be  recorded before and after  all ad-
    justments.
      7.2.6 Response Time. Using tbe data devel-
    oped under paragraph 6.3, calculate the  time
    Interval from concentration switching to 95
    percent to the final stable  value for all up-
    scale and downscale tests. Report the mean of
    the three upscale test times and the mean of
    the three downicale test times. Tbe  two at-
    eragt time*  should  sot  differ  by  more  than
    15  percent  of  the tlower  time. Report the
    slower time as the system response time. Re-
    cord the results on Figw» 3—8-
      8. References.
      8.1 "Performance  Specifications for  Sta-
    tionary Source'Monitoring  Systems for Gases
    and Visible  Emissions," Environmental  Pro-
    tection Agency, Research Triangle Pars, N.C.,
    EPA-650/2-74-013, January 1S74.
      8.2 "Experimental  Statistics," Department
    of  Commerce, National Bureau of  Standards
    Handbook 91,  1963,  pp.   3-31. paragraphs
    8-3.1.4.
    
    (Sea. Ill and  114 of the  Cletn Air Act, as
    amended by sec.  4(a) of Pub. L. 91-604, 84
    Stat 1478 (43 U.8.C. 1M7C-6, by »«e. 1*(C) (2)
    of  Pub. L. 91-eXH. «4 SUt. 1713  (43 O.S.C.
    !U7g)>.
                                                                      11-86
    

    -------
               T1«
                                 lire
     I«ro
     OrUt     1pm       Drift
    (jjcr.)    tod In,
                                                                         OM«
       itrs Orl ft • lf44A i^ro Of lit
       ClH6r4t1w OHf. • [IHu\ S**n
      "•Aeulutt Vain.
                                   Fljurt J-l.  Ztr» tnd UllSritlon Drift (2 Hour).
    Jate                        Zero                 Span            Calibration
    and            Zero        Drift               Reading              Drift
    Time         Reading      UZero)      {After zero adjustment)     (iSpan)
    Zero Drift « [Kean Zero Drift*
           C.I.  (Zero)
    Calibration Drift •  [Mean Span Drift*
                     C.I. (Span)
      Absolute value
                            3-2.  Zero  »n<3  Calibration  Drift (24-hour)
                                              11-87
    

    -------
    Datt of Test
    Span Gas Concentration
    A/valyzer Spin Setting
    1.
    Upscale ^ 2.
    3.
    Average
    1.
    Downseale 2.
    3.
    Average
    _ PPW
    ppm
    seconds *
    seconds
    seconds *
    upscale response seconds
    seconds
    seconds
    seconds
    downscale response seconds
    system aversae response time (slower time) - seconds
    average response                   slower tiire
                                                                    ., .,
                                                                       "*
                         Figure  3-3.   Respcnss
               (B«c. 114 of tin ae>A Air Act  u
               (43 U.8.C. !Si7e-8).).
                                     11-88
    

    -------
    NSPS OPERATIONAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - PROMULGATED
                              11-89
    

    -------
    Subpart N—Standards of Performance for
              Iron and Stewl Plants *
     g 60.140  Applicability and  d«aicnation
         of affected facility, 6 4
    
       (a)  The affected facility to which the
     provisions of this subpart apply la each
     basic  oxygen process furnace.
       (b)  Any facility under paragraph  (a)
     of this section that commences construc-
     tion or modification after June 11, 1973,
     is subject to the requirements of tills
     subpart.
    
    
     i 60.141   Definitiona.
       As used In this subpart,  &Q terms not
     defined herein shall  have  the meaning
     given  them In the Act and In subpart A.
     (f this part.
       (a.)  "Basic oxygen process /umace"
     a. ">FF)  means  any furnace producing
          by charging scrap steel, hot metal,
     a..a flux materials into a vessel and In-
     troducing a high volume of an oxygen-
     rich sas.
       (K-  "Steel production cycle" means
     the '-"rations required to produce each
     bat..h 01 steel and Includes the following
     major- {unctions: Scrap charging, pre-
     heating  (when  used),  hot metal charg-
     ing, primary oxygen blowing, additional
     oxygen blowing (when used), and tap-
     Ping.
       (c)  "Startup means  the setting Into
     operation for the first steel production
     cycle of a relined BOPF or a BOPF
     which has been out of production for a
     minimum continuous time period of
     eight hours.
     § 60.142   Standard  for particnlate mat-
         ter.
       .(a)  On  and after the date on which
     the performance test required to be con-
     ducted by  ] W.8 Is completed, no owner
     or operator subject  to the provisions of
     tii .s subpart  shall  discharge or  cause
     iv: discharge into the atmosphere from
     any affected  facility any  gases which.:
       (1)  Contain participate  matter In ex-
     cess of 50 mg/dscm (0.022 gr/dscf ).
       (2)  Exit from a control device ana
     exhibit 10 percent  opacity or greater,
     except that an opacity of greater than
     10 percent but less than  20 percent
     may  occur once  per steel production
     cycle.
     f 60.143  Monitoring of operations.
      (a) The owner or  operator of an af-
     fected facility shall maintain a single
     time-measuring   Instrument   which
     shall be used in recording daily the
     time and duration  of each steel pro-
     duction cycle, and the time and dura-
     tion of any diversion of exhaust gases
     from  the  main  stack  servicing the
     BOPF.
      (b) The owner or operator of any af-
    fected facility that uses venturl scrub-
    ber emission control  equipment shall
    install,  calibrate, maintain, and con-
    tinuously operate monitoring devices
    as follows:
      (DA monitoring device for the con-
    tinuous measurement of the pressure
    loss through the venturt constriction
    of the control equipment. The moni-
    toring device is to be certified by the
    manufacturer to be  accurate within
    ±250 Pa (±1 inch water).
      (2) A monitoring device for the con-
    tinous  measurement  of  the  water
    supply pressure to the control equip-
    ment. The monitoring device is  to be
    certified by the manufacturer to be ac-
    curate within ±5 percent of the design
    water supply pressure. The monitoring
    device's  pressure sensor  or  pressure
    tap must be located close to the  water
    discharge point. The  Administrator
    may be consulted for approval of alter-
    native  locations  for  the  pressure
    sensor or tap.
      (3)  All monitoring  devices shall be
    synchronized each day with the time-
    measuring   instrument  used  under
    paragraph  (a) of this  section.  The
    chart recorder error directly after syn-
    chronization shall not exceed 0.08 cm
    (%t inch).
      (4)  All monitoring devices shall use
    chart recorders which are operated at
    a minimum chart speed  of 3.8 cm/hr
    (1.5 In/hr).
      (5) All monitoring devices are  to be
    recalibreated annually, and  at  other
    times as the Administrator may re-
    quire, in accordance  with the proce-
    duces under § 60.13(b)(3).
      (c)  Any owner or operator subject to
    requirements under paragraph  (b) of
    this section  shall report  for each cal-
    endar quarter all measurements over
    any  three-hour  period  that average
    more than 10 percent below the aver-
    age levels maintained during the most
    recent  performance  test  conducted
    under § 60.8 in which the affected fa-
    cility demonstrated  compliance with
    the standard under § 60.142(aXl). The
    accuracy of the respective  measure-
    ments, not to exceed the values speci-
    fied in paragraphs 
    -------
    Subpart T—Standards of Performance for
      the Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: W«t-
      Process Phosphoric Acid Plants
    § 60.200  Applicability  an
         of «ffee»ed facility.
    
       (») Tbe affected facility to which the
     provisions of this subpart apply to each'
     wet-process phosphoric acid plant For
     the purpose of this subpart the affected
     facility-' Includes  any combination of:
     reactors, filter*,  evaporators,  and hot-
     wells. '"•
       (to) Any facility under paragraph (a)
     of  this  section  that  commences con-
     struction or modification after October
     22,  1974, is subject to the  requirements
     of this cubpart
    160.201  DeBnition*.
      As used in this subpart, all terms  not
    defined herein shall have the meaning
    given them In the Act and in Subpart A
    of this part.
       (a)   "Wet-process  phosphoric  acid
    plant" means any facility manufactur-
    ing  phosphoric  acid  by  reacting phos-
    phate rock and acid.
       (b) "Total fluorides" means elemental
    fluorine  and  all fluoride compounds as
    measured by  reference methods specified
    In 5 60.204, or equivalent or alternative
    methods.
       (c) "Equivalent PXDi feed" means  th»
    quantity of  phosphorus, expressed as
    phosphorous  pentoxide, fed  to the proc-
    8 60.203  Monitoring of operation*.
      (c) The owner or operator of any wet-
    process phosphoric acid  subject to the
    provisions of this part shall Install, cali-
    brate, maintain, and operate a monitor-
    Ing device which  continuously measures
    and permanently records the total pres-
    sure drop across the process  scrubbing
    system. The monitoring device shall have
    an accuracy of ±5 percent over its op-
    erating range.
    (S*e. 1M of Uu O«AO Ait Act M
    
    -------
    Subpart U—Standard* of Pwrformanca for
      the Phosphate Fcrtllizar Industry: Supar-
      phosphoric Acid Plant*
    160.210  AppliuKllitj  a»d  deti^nmtion
         •f affected
       (a) Tne affected facility to which the
     provision* of this subpart apply it each"
     tuperphSsphoric  acid  plant  For  the
     purpose, of this  subpart,  the affected
     facility Includes  any combination of:
     •vaporators, hotwells, acid romps,  and
     poking tankrt
       (b) Any facility under paragraph (a)
     of this aection that commences con-
     struction or modification after October
     22, 1974,  U subject to the  requirements
     of this subpart
    
    
     | 60.211   Definition*.
       As used in this  subpart, all terms not
     denned herein shall  have the meaning
     given them in the Act and In  Subpart A
     of this part.
       (a)  "Superphosphoric   acid   plant"
     means  any facility which  concentrates
     wet-process phosphoric acid  to 66 per-
     cent or greater P.O. content by weight
     for eventual consumption as a fertilizer.
       (b)  "Total fluorides" means  elemen-
     tal fluorine and all fluoride compounds
     as measured by reference  methods spe-
     cified in S 60.214, or equivalent or alter-
     native methods.
       (c) "Equivalent P.O. feed"  means the
     quantity  of phosphorus,  expressed  as
     phosphorous  pentoxide.  fe4  to   the
     process.
    | 60.213  Monitoring of operation*.
      (c) The owner or  operator  of any
    superpnosphorlc acid plant subject to the
    provisions of thu part shall Install, cali-
    brate, maintain, and operate a monitor-
    ing device  which continuously measures
    and permanently records the total pres •
    sure drop  across the process scrubbing
    system. The monitoring device shall have
    an  accuracy of  i  5 percent over  its
    operating range.
    
    (8*e. 114 of Uu CJ««J> Ait Act at tmn
    -------
     •ubpart V—Standard* of P*rfonn«nc* for
       th« Phosphate Fertilizer Industry. Diam-
       monium Phosphate Plants
     §60.220   Applicability aa«
         of affected facility.
       (A) The affected facility to which the
     provision* of this cubp&rt apply la each,
     granulat dJammonium phosphate plant.
     For the purpose of this subpart, the af-
     fected facility Includes any combination
     of: reactors, granulatore, dryers, coolers,
     screens, aod mills.
       (b) Ally facility under paragraph (a)
     of this section that commences construc-
     tion  or modification  after  October 22.
     1974, la subject to the requirements  of
     this subpext.
     | 60.221   Definitions.
       As used in this subpart, all terms not
     denned  herein shall have the meaning
     given them in the Act and in Subpart A
     ol this part.
       (a) "Granular   rilammonium   phos-
     phate plant" means any plant  manu-
     facturing  granular diammonlum phos-
     phate by reacting  phosphoric acid with
     ammonia.
       (b) "Total fluorides" means elemental
     fluorine and all fluoride compounds as
     measured by reference methods speci-
     fied  in ! 60.224,  or equivalent or alter-
     native methods.
       
    -------
    Subpart W—Standards of Performance for
      the Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Trip**
      Superphosphate Plants
      60.230  Applicability
         of affected facility.
    •ad  «V«i The Affected facility to which the
     provisions of this cubp&rt apply is each-
     triple superphosphate plant. For the pur-
     pose of this subpart,  the affected facility
     Includes any  combination of:  mixers.
     curing "belts (dens), reactors, granula-
     tors. dryers, cookers, screens, mills, and
     facilities which store run-of-pUe triple
     superphosphate.
       (b) Any facility under paragraph (a)
     of this section that commences construc-
     tion or modification after October  22,
     1974, is subject to the requlremente of
     this subpart
    | 60.231  Definition*.
      As used in this subpart. all terms not
    defined herein gh?J1  have the meaning
    given them in the Act and in Subpart A
    of this part.
       (a) "Triple  superphosphate  plant"
    means any facility manufacturing triple
    superphosphate by reacting  phosphate
    rode with phosphoric acid. A run-of-plle
    triple superphosphate  plant  include*
    curing and storing.
       
    -------
    tubpart X—Standards of «»rform*nc» tor
      th« Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: Gran-
      ular Triple  Superphosphate Storage  Fa-
      cilities
    160.240  Applicability and  dc«i«n«lu»a
         •f affected tacility-
      <») Ike Affected f aeflKy to which the-
    prorteiotM of tills cubpart apply to each
    granular triple superphosphate storage
    facility .-.For ttie purpose of thia subpart,
    the affected facility Includes any combi-
    nation ef: storage or curing  piles, con-
    veyors, elevators, screens, and m1U«.
      (b) Any facility under paragraph (a)
    of this section that commences construc-
    tion or modification  after October  22,
    1874. IB subject to the requirements of
    thi* subpart.
    160.241  Definition*.
      As used in this subpart, all terms not
    denned herein shall have the meaning
    given them  In the Act and in Subpart A
    of this part.
      (a) "Granular triple  superphosphate
    Storage facility" means any facility cur-
    ing or storing granular triple superphos-
    phate.
      (b) "Total fluorides" means elemental
    fluorine and all  fluoride compounds as
    measured by reference methods specified
    In {60.244,  or equivalent or alternative
    methods.
      (c) "Equivalent  PiOt  stored"  means
    the quantity of phosphorus, expressed as
    phosphorus  pentoxide, being cured  ox
    stored in the affected facility.
      (d) "Fresh granular triple superphos-
    phate" means granular triple superphos-
    phate produced no  more than 10  days
    prior to the date of the performance test
    £ 60.243  Monitoring of operation*.
       (c) The owner or  operator of  any
    granular  triple  superphosphate storage
    facility subject to the provisions of  this
    part  shall install, calibrate,  maintain,
    and operate  a monitoring device which
    continuously measures and permanently
    records the total pressure drop across the
    process scrubbing sytem. The monitoring
    device shall have an accuracy of ±5 per-
    cent over its operating range.
     (Sue. IK at u>« a«*n AH Act M
     (43 CAC.1U7C-9).).
                                                                                     References:
    
                                                                                       60.2
                                                                                       60.7
                                                                                       60.8
                                                                                       60.11
                                                                                       60.13
                                                               11-95
    

    -------
      Subpart Y—Standards of Performance lor
              Coal Preparation Plants
    160.250  Applicability a«a
         •I affected facility.
    
       (a> The provision* of thte aubpart an
     applicable to any of  the following af-
     fected  facilities  in  coal  preparation
     plants wnlr.li process more than 200 ton*
     per day: .thermal dryers, pneumatic coal-
     cleaning: equipment  (air tables), coal
     processing and conveying equipment (In-
     cluding -breakers  and crushers), coal
     atorage systems, and  coal transfer and
     V-mrllnp «y«l_«1llc
       (to) Any facility under paragraph (a)
     of this section that commences construc-
     tion or modification  after  October  3 *,
     1974, is subject  to the requirements of
      160.251   Definition*.
       As used in this subpart. all terms not
      defined herein have the meaning given
      them In the Act and in Subpart A of this
      part.
        (a)  "Coal preparation plant" means
      any  facility   (excluding  underground
      mining operations) which prepares coal
      by  one or more of the  following proc-
      esses: breaking, crushing, screening, wet
      or dry cleaning,  ttn^ thermal drying.
       (fa) "Bituminous coal" means solid fos-
      sil fuel classified as bituminous coal by
      A-S.TJU. Designation D-38S-66.
    ,  ' (c) "Coal" means all solid fossil fuels
      classified as anthracite, bituminous, nib-
      bltumlnouB, or lignite by A^.TJuL Des-
      ignation D-388-66.
       (d) "Cyclonic flow" means a splraling
      movement of exhaust gases within a duct
      or stack.
       (e) Thermal  dryer" means any  fa-
     cility In which the moisture content of
     bituminous coal  It reduced by contact
      with a heated gas stream which Is ex-
      hausted to the atmosphere.
       (f)  "Pneumatic coal-cleaning equip-
      ment" means any facility which classifies
      bituminous coal by size or separates bi-
      tuminous coal from refuse by application
      of air stream (s).
       (g)  "Coal  processing  and  conveying
      equipment" means any machinery  used
      to reduce  the size of coal or to separate
      coal from refuse,  and the equipment used
      to convey  coal  to or  remove'coal and
     refuse from  the machinery.  This  In-
     cludes, but Is not limited to,  breakers,
     crushers, screens, and conveyor belts.
       (h) "Coal storage system" means any
     facility used to store coal except for open
     atorage piles.
       (1)  "Transfer  and  loading system"
     means any facility used to transfer and
     load coal for shipment.
    | 60.253  Monitoring- of operation*.
       (a) The owner or operator of any ther-
    mal dryer shall install, calibrate, mam-
    tain, and continuously operate monitor -
    Ing devices as follows:
       (DA monitoring device for the meas-
    urement of the temperature of the gas
    stream at the exit of the thermal dryer
    on a continuous basis. The monitoring
    device  is to be certified  by the manu-
    facturer to be accurate within ±3* Fahr-
    enheit.
       (2) For affected facilities that use ven-
    turi  scrubber  emission  control  equip-
    ment:
       (1) A monitoring device for the con-
    tinuous measurement of the pressure loss
    through the venturl constriction of the
    control equipment. The monitoring de-
    vice is  to be certified by  the manufac-
    turer to be accurate within  ±1  Inch
    water gage.
       (11)  A monitoring device for the con-
    tinuous measurement of the water sup-
    ply pressure to the control equipment.
    The monitoring device is  to be certified
    by the manufacturer to be  accurate with-
    in  ±5  percent  of  design water supply
    pressure. The pressure sensor or tap must
    be located  close to the water discharge
    point. The  Administrator may be  con-
    sulted for approval of alternative loca-
    tions.
       (b) All monitoring devices under para-
    graph (a) of this section are to be recali-
    brated annually in accordance with pro-
    cedures under { 60.13(b) (3).
    (S«c. 114  at UM  CJ«*n Air Act u
    (U O.S.C. l«57o-0).).
                                            References:
                                                                                       60.
                                                                                       60.
                                                                                       60.
                                                                                       60.
                                                  2
                                                  7
                                                  8
                                                  n
                                                                                       60.13
                                                             11-596'
    

    -------
     Subpart GG—Standards of
     Performance for Stationary Gas
     Turbines
    
     § 6O330  Applicability and'd«*ignatJon of
     affected facility.
       The provisions of this subpart are
     applicable to the following affected
     facilities: ail stationary gas turbines
     with a heat input at peak load equal to
     or greater than 10.7 gigajoules per hour.
     based on the lower heating value of the
     fuel fired.
    
     §60.331  Definitions.
       As used in this subpart all terms not
     defined herein shall have the meaning
     given them in the Act and in subpart A
     of this part.
       (a) "Stationary gas turbine"  means
     any simple cycle gas turbine,
     regenerative cycle gas turbine  or any
     gas turbine portion of a combined cycle
     steam/electric generating system that is
     not self propelled. It may, however, be
     mounted on a vehicle for portability.
       (b) "Simple cycle gas turbine" means
     any stationary gas turbine which does
     not recover heat from the gas turbine
     exhaust gases to preheat  the inlet
     combustion air to the gas turbine, or
     which does not recover heat from the
     gas turbine exhaust gases to heat water
     or generate steam.
      (c) "Regenerative cycle gas turbine""
    means any stationary gas turbine which
    recovers heat from the gas turbine
                                                 11-97
    

    -------
     exhaust gases to preheat the inlet
     combustion air to the gas turbine.
       (d) "Combined cycle gas turbine"
     means any stationary gas turbine which
     recovers heat from the gas turbine
     exhaust gases to heat water or generate
     steam.
       (e) "Emergency gas turbine" means
     any stationary gas turbine which
     operates as a mechanical or electrical
     power source only when the primary
     power source for a facility has been
     rendered roopeTwhle by an emergency
     situation.;
       (f) "Ice fog" means an atmospheric
     suspension of highly reflective ice
     crystals.
       (g) "ISO standard day conditions"
     means 263 degrees Kelvin, 60 percent
     relative humidity and 101.3 kilopascals
     pressure.
       (h) "Efficiency" means the gas turbine
     manufacturer's rated heat rate at peak
     load in terms Of heat input per unit of
     power output based on the lower
     heating value of the fueL
       (i) "Peak load" means 100 percent of
     the manufacturer's design capacity of
     the gas turbine at ISO standard day
     conditions.
       fj) "Base load" means the load level at
     which a gas turbine is normally
     operated.
       (k) "Fire-fighting turbine" means any
     stationary gas turbine that is used solely
     to pump water for extinguishing fires.
       (1) "Turbines employed in oil/gas
     production or oi]/gas transportation" .
     means any stationary gas turbine used
     to provide power to extract crude oil/
     natural gas from the earth or to move
     crude oil/natural gas, or products
     refined  from these substances through
     pipelines.
       (m] A "Metropolitan Statistical Area"
     or "MSA" as defined by the Department
     of Commerce.
       (n) "Offshore platform gas turbines"
     means any stationary gas turbine
     located on a platform in an ocean.
       (o) "Garrison facility" means any
     permanent military installation.
       fj>) "Gas turbine model" means a
     group of gas turbines having the same
     nominal air flow, combuster inlet
     pressure, combuster inlet temperature.
     firing temperature, turbine inlet
     temperature and turbine inlet pressure.
    
     § 60432  Standard for nitrogen oxides.
       (a) On and after the date on which the
     performance test required by § 60.8 is
     completed, every owner or operator
     subject to the provisions of this subpart,
     as specified in paragraphs (b), (c), and
     (d) of this section, shall comply with one
     of the following, except as provided in
    paragraphs (e), {f), (gj, (h), and (i) of this
    section.
       (1) No owner or operator subject to
    the provisions of this subpart shall
    cause to be discharged into the
    atmosphere from any stationary gas
    turbine, any gases which contain
    nitrogen oxides in excess of:
    
    
                      (14 4)
    STD =  0.0075      Y    +  F
    
                              32
     where:
     SI L)=allowable NO, emissions (percent by
        volume at 15 percent oxygen and on a
        dry basis).
     Y=manufacturer's rated heat rate at
        manufacturer's rated load (kilojoules per
        welt hour) or, actual measured heat rate
        based on lower heating value of fuel as
        measured at actual peak load for the
        facility. The value of Y shall not exceed
        14.4 kilojoules per watt hour.
     F=NO, emission allowance for fuel-bound
        nitrogen as defined in part (3) of this
        paragraph.
       (2) No owner or operator subject to the
     provisions of this subpart shall cause to be
     discharged into the atmosphere from any
     stationary gas turbine, any gases which
     con'ain nitrogen oxides in excess of:
    STD  = O.OT50  (-^~)  +  F
     where:
     STD=«llowable NO, emissions (percent by
        volume at IS percent oxygen and on a
        dry basis).
     Y=manufacturer's rated heat rate at
        manufacturer's rated peak load
        (kilojoules per watt hour), or actual
        measured heat rate based on lower
        beating value of fuel as measured at
        actual peak load for the facility. The
        value of Y shall not exceed 14.4
        kilojoules per watt hour.
     F=NO, emission allowance for fuel-bound
        nitrogen as defined in part (3) of this
        paragraph.
    
       (3) F shall be defined according to the
     nitrogen content of the fuel as follows:
     Fu*l-8oum) KHrogen           f
     (percent by ««ignt)   (NO  percent by volume)
          N < 0.015
    
     0.015 < N <_ 0.1
    
     0.1 - N < 0.25
    
        » > O.X
           0.04(N)
    
    0.004 * 0.0067
    -------
     exemptions will be allowed only while
     the mandatory water restrictions are in
     effect.
    
     § 60.333  Standard for sulfur dioxide.
       On and after the date on which the
     performance test required to be
     conducted by § 60.8 is completed, every
     owner or operator subject to the
     provision of this subpart shall comply
     with one or the other of the following
     conditions:            v
       (a) No owner or operator subject to
     the provisions of this subpart shall
     cause-k> be discharged into the
     atmosphere from any stationary gas
     turbine any gases which contain sulfur
     dioxide in excess of 0.015 percent by
     volume at 15 percent oxygen and on a
     dry basis.
       (b) No owner or operator subject to
     the provisions of this subpart shall burn
     in any stationary gas turbine any fuel
     which contains sulfur in excess of 0.8
     percent by weight.
    
     $60.334  Moriilofiiig of operations.
       (a) The owner or operator of any
     stationary gas turbine subject  to the
     provisions of this subpart and using
     water injection to control NO, emissions
     shall install and operate a continuous
     monitoring system to monitor and record
     the fuel consumption and the ratio of
     water to fuel being fired in the turbine.
     This system shall be accurate to within
     ±5.0 percent and shall be approved by
     the Administrator.
       (b) The owner or operator of any
     stationary gas turbine subject to the
    • provisions of this subpart shall monitor
     sulfur content and nitrogen content of
     the fuel being fired in the turbine. The
     frequency of determination of these
     values shall be as follows:
       (1) If the turbine is supplied its fuel
     from a bulk storage tank, the values
     shall be determined on each occasion
     that fuel is transferred to the storage
     tank from any other source.
       (2J If the turbine is supplied its fuel
     without intermediate bulk storage the
     values shall be determined and recorded
     daily. Owners, operators or fuel vendors
     may develop custom schedules for
     determination of the values based on the
     design and operation of the affected
     facility and the characteristics of the
     fuel supply. These custom schedules
     shall be substantiated with data and
     must be approved by the Administrator
     before, they can be used to comply with
     paragraph (b) of this section.
       (c) For the purpose of reports required
     under § 60.7(c), periods of excess
     emissions that shall be reported are
     defined as follows:
       (1) Nitrogen oxides. Any one-hour
    period during which the average water-
      to-fuel ratio, as measured by the
      continuous monitoring system, falls
      below the water-tQ-fuel ratio determined
      to demonstrate compliance with § 60.332
      by the performance test required in
      § 60.8 or any period during which the
      fuel-bound nitrogen of the fuel is greater
      than the maximum nitrogen content
      allowed by  the fuel-bound nitrogen
      allowance used during the performance
      test required in § 60.8. Each report shall
      Include the average water-to-fuel ratio,
      average fuel consumption, ambient
      conditions, gas turbine load, and
      nitrogen content of the fuel during the
      period of excess emissions, and the
      graphs or figures developed under
      § 60.335(a).
        (2) Sulfur dioxide. Any daily period
      during which the sulfur content of the
      fuel being fired in the gas turbine
      exceeds 0.8 percent.
        (3) Ice fog. Each period during which
      an exemption provided in §  60.332(g) is
      in effect shall be reported in writing to
      the Administrator quarterly. For each
      period the ambient conditions existing
      during the period, the date and time the
                           P
                      air pollution control system was
                      deactivated, and the date and time the
                      air pollution control system was
                      reactivated shall be reported. All
                      quarterly reports shall be postmarked by
                      the 30th day following the end of each
                      calendar quarter.
                      (Sec. 114 of the Clean Air Act as amended [42
                      U.S.C. 1B57C-9]).
    
                      $ 60.335 Test methods and procedures.
                        (a) The reference methods in
                      Appendix A to this part, except as
                      provided in § 60.8(bJ. shall be used to
                      determine compliance with  the
                    ' standards prescribed in 5 60.332 as
                      follows:
                        (1) Reference Method 20 for the
                      concentration of nitrogen oxides and
                      oxygen. For affected facilities under this
                      subpart the span value shall be 300
                      parts- per million of nitrogen oxides.
                        (i) The nitrogen oxides emission level
                      measured by Reference Method 20 shall
                      be adjusted to ISO standard day
                      conditions by the following ambient
                      condition correction factor
           = (N0y
                 y
                  obs
     refxO.5
    j    I
     obs
    e19CH
                                             obs
    - 0.00633)   (
                                                                   'AMB
     where:
     NO. = emi3sions of NO, at 15 percent oxygen
         and ISO standard ambient conditions.
     NOKO«, = measured NO, emissions at 15
         percent oxygen, ppmv.
     Pt«<= reference combusler inlet absolute
         pressure at 101.3 kilopascals ambient
         pressure.
     P«fc. = measured combustor inlet absolute
         pressure at test ambient pressure.
     Hol-= specific humidity of ambient air at test
     e= transcendental constant (2.718).
     Tore = temperature of ambient air at test
       The adjusted NO, emission level shall
     be used to determine compliance with
     § 60.332.
       (ii) Manufacturers may develop
    * custom ambient condition correction
     factors for each gas turbine model they
     manufacture in terms of combustor inlet
     pressure, ambient air pressure, ambient
     air humidity and ambient air
     temperature to adjust the nitrogen
     oxides emission level measured by the
     performance test as provided for in
     § 60.8 to ISO standard day conditions.
     These ambient condition correction
     factors shall be substantiated with data
     and must be approved for  use by the
     Administrator before the initial"
     performance test required  by § 60.8.
     Notices of approval of custom ambient
     condition  correction factors will be
     published in the Federal Register.
       (iii) The water-to-fuel ratio necessary
     to comply with § 60.332 will  be
     determined during  the initial
     performance test by measuring NO,
     emission using Reference Method 20 and
                      the water-to-fuel ratio necessary to
                      comply with § 60.332 at 30, 50, 75, and
                      100 percent of peak load or at four
                      points in the normal operating range of
                      the gas turbine, including the minimum
                      point in the range and peak load. All
                      loads shall be corrected to ISO
                      conditions using the appropriate
                      equations supplied by the manufacturer.
                        (2) The analytical  methods and
                      procedures employed to determine the
                      nitrogen content of the fuel being fired
                      shall be approved by the Administrator
                      and shall be accurate to within ±5
                      percent.
                        (b) The method for determining
                      compliance with § 60.333, except as
                      provided in § 60.8(b), shall be as   _  .
                     -follows:
                        (1) Reference Method 20 for the
                      concentration of sulfur dioxide and
                      oxvgen or
                        (2) ASTM D2830-71 for the sulfur
                      content of  liquid fuels and  ASTM
                      D1072-70 for the sulfur content of
                      gaseous fuels. These methods shall also
                      be used to comply with § 60.334(b).
                        {c) Analysis for the purpose of
                      determining the sulfur content and the
                      nitrogen content of the fuel as required
                      by § 60.334(b), this subpart may be
                      performed by the owner/operator, a
                      service contractor retained by the
                      owner/operator, the fuel vendor, or any
                      other qualified agency provided that the
                      analytical methods employed by these
                      agencies comply with the applicable
                      paragraphs of this section.
                                                         11-99
    

    -------
    NSPS REGULATIONS - PROPOSED
              11-100
    

    -------
       ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
       AGENCY
    
       40 CFR Part 60
       IFRL 12/6-4)
    
       Standards of Performance for New
       Stationary Sources; Continuous
       Monitoring Performance
       Specifications
    
      AGENCY: Environmental Protection
      Agency (EPA).
      ACTION: Proposed Revisions.
    
      SUMMARY: On October 6.1975 (40 FR
      46250). the EPA promulgated revisions to
      40 CFR Part 60. Standards of
      Performance for New Stationary
      Sources, to establish specific
      requirements pertaining lo continuous
      emission monitoring. An appendix to the
      regulation contained Performance
      Specifications 1 through 3, which
      detailed the continuous monitoring
      instrument performance and equipment
      specifications, installation requirements,
      and test and data computation
      procedures for evaluating the
      acceptability of continuous monitoring
      cystems. Since the promulgation of these
      performance specifications, the need for
      a number of changes which would
      clarify the specification test procedures,
      equipment specifications, and
      monitoring system installation
      requirements has become apparent. The
      purpose of the revisions is to
      incorporate these changes into
      Performance Specifications 1 through 3.
       The proposed revisions would apply
      to all monitoring systems currently
      subject to performance specifications 1.
     2. or 3, including sources subject to
     Appendix P to 40 CFR Part 51.
     DATES: Comments must be received on
     or before December 10.1979.
     ADDRESSES: Comments. Comments
     should be submitted (in  duplicate if
     possible) to the Central Docket Section
     (A-130). Attn: Docket No. OAQPS-79-^,
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     401 M Street. S.W.. Washington. D.C.
     204GO.
       Docket. Docket No. OAQPS-79-4,
     containing material relevant to this
     rulemaking. is located in the U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency,
     Central Docket Section. Room 2903B. 401
     M Street. S.W.. Washington. D.C. The
     docket may be inspected between 8
     A.M. and 4 P.M. on weekdays, and a
     reasonable fee may be charged for
    copying.
    FOB FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Don R.  Goodwin. Director. Emission
    Standards and Engineering Division
      (MD-13). Environmental Protection
      Agency, Research Triangle Park. North
      Carolina 27711. telephone number (919)
      541-5271.
      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Changes
      common to all three of the performance
      specifications are the clarification of the
      procedures and equipment
      specifications, especially the
      requirement for intalling the continuous
      monitoring sample interface and of the
      calculation procedure for relative
      accuracy. Specific changes to the
      specifications are as follows:
      Performance Specification
        1. The optical design specification for
      mean and peak spectral responses and
      for the angle of view and projection
      have been  changed from "500 to 600 nm"
      range to "515  to 585 nm" range and from
      "5"' to "3"'. respectively.
        2, The following equipment
      specifications have been added:
        a. Optical alignment  sight indicator
      for readily  checking alignment.
        b. For instruments having automatic
      compensation for dirt accumulation on
      exposed optical surfaces, a
      compensation indicator at the control
      panel so that the permissible maximum
      4 percent compensation can be
      determined.
       c. Easy access to exposed optical
      surfaces for cleaning and maintenance.
       d. A system for checking zero and
      upscale calibration (previously required
     in paragraph 60.13).
       e. For systems with slotted tubes, a
     slotted portion greater than  90 percent of
     effluent pathlength (shorter  slots are
     permitted if shown to be equivalent).
       f. An equipment specification for the
     monitoring system data  recorder
     resolution of <5 percent of full scale.
       3. A procedure for determining the
     acceptability of the optical alignment
     sight has been  specified: the optical
     alignment sight must be capable of
     indicating that the instrument is
     misaligned when an error of ±2 percent
     opacity is caused by misalignment of the
     instrument at a pathlength of 8 meters.
      4. Procedures for calibrating the
     attenuators  used during  instrument
     calibrations have been added: these
     procedures require the use of a
     laboratory spectrophotometer operating
     in the 400-700 nm range  with a detector
     angle view of, <10 degrees and an
     accuracy of  1 percent.
      5. The following changes have been
     made to the  procedures for the
     operational test period:
      a. The requirement for an analog strip
    chart recorder during the performance
    tests has been deleted: all data are
    collected on  the monitoring system data
    recorder.
        b. Adjustment of the zero and sp.in H(
      24-hour intervals during the drift tests is
      optional: adjustments are required only
      when the accumulated drift exceeds the
      24-hour drift specification.
        c. The amount of automatic zero
      compensation for dirt accumulation
      must be determined during the 24-hour
      zero check so that  the actual zero drift
      can be quantified. The automatic zero
      compensation system must be operated
      during the performance test.
        d. The requirement for offsetting the
      data recorder zero  during the
      operational lest period has been deleted.
        e. Off the stack "zero alignment" of
      the instrument prior to installation is
      permitted.
    
      Performance Specification 2
    
        1. "Continuous monitoring system"
      has been redefined to include the
      diluent monitor, if applicable. The
      change requires that the relative
      accuracy of the system be determined in
      terms of the emission standard, e.g.,
      mass per unit calorific value for fossil-
      fuel fired steam generators.
       2. The applicability of the test
      procedures excludes single-pass, in-situ
      continuous monitoring systems. The
     procedures for determining the
     acceptability of these  systems are
     evaluated on a  case-by-case basis.
       3. For extractive systems with diluent
     monitors, the pollutant and diluent
     monitors are required  to use the same
     sample interface.
       4. The procedure for determining the
     acceptability of the  calibration gases
     has been revised, and  the 20 percent
     (with 95 percent confidence interval)
     criterion has been changed to 5 percent
     of mean value with no single value being
     over 10 percent from the mean.
       5. For low concentrations, a 10 percent
     of the applicable standard limitation for
     the relative accuracy has been added.
      6. A_n equipment specification for the
     system data recorder requiring that the
     chart scale be readable lo within <0.50
     percent of full-scale  has been added.
      7. Instead of spanning the instrument
     at 90 percent of full-scale, a mid-level
     span is required.
      8. The response time test procedure
     has been revised and the difference
     limitation between the up-scale and
     down-scale time has been deleted.
      9. The relative accuracy test
     procedure has been revised to allow
     different tests (e.g.. pollutant, diluent,
     moisture) during a 1-hour period to be
    correlated.
      10. A  low-level drift may be
    substituted for the zero drift test
                                                      11-101
    

    -------
       Performance Specification 3
        1. The applicability of the test
       procedures has been limited to those
       monitors that introduce calibration
       gases directly into the analyzer and are
       used as diluent monitors. Alternative
       procedures for other types of monitors
       are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
        2, Other changes were made to be
       consistent with the revisions under
       Performance Specification 2.
        The^proposed revised performance
       specifications would apply to all sources
       subject to Performance Specifications 1.
       2. or 3. These include sources subject to
       standards of performance that have
       already been promulgated and sources
       subject to Appendix-P to 40 CFR Part 51.
       Since the purpose of these revisions is to
       clarify the performance specifications
       which were promulgated on October 6.
       1975. not to establish more  stringent
      requirements, it is reasonable to
      conclude that most continuous
      monitoring instruments which met and
      can continue to meet the October 6,
      1975. specifications can also meet the
      revised specifications.
        Under Executive Order 12044. the
      Environmental Protection Agency is
      required to judge  whether a regulation is
      "significant" and  therefore subject to the
      procedural requirements of the Order or
      whether it may follow other specialized
      development procedures. EPA labels
      these other regulations "specialized". I
      have reviewed this regulation and
      determined thai it is a specialized
      regulation not subject to the procedural
      requirements of Executive Order 12044.
       Dated: October 1.1979.
      Douglas M. Costle,
     Administrator.
       It is proposed to revise Appendix B.
     Part 60 of Chapter 1, Title 40 of the Code
     of Federal Regulations as follows:
     Appendix B—Performance
     Specifications
    
     Performance Specification 1—
     Specifications and Test Procedures For
     Opacity Continuous Monitoring Systems
     in Stationary Sources
    
     1. Applicability and'Principle
       1.1   Applicability. This Specification
     contains instrument design,
     performance,  and installation
     requirements, and teat  and data
     computation procedures for evaluating
     the acceptability of continuous
     monitoring systems for opacity. Certain
     design requirements and  lest procedures
     established in the Specification may not
    be applicable  to ell instrument designs:
    equivalent systems and test procedures
    may be used with prior approval by the
    Administrator.
         1.2  Principle. The opacity of
       particulale matter in stack emissions Is
       continuously monitored by a
       measurement system based upon the
       principle of transmissometry. Light
       having specific spectral characteristics
       is projected from a lamp through the
       effluent in the stack  or duct and the
       intensity of the projected light is
       measured by a sensor. The projected
       light is attenuated due to absorption and
       scatter by the particulale matter in the
       effluent; the percentage of visible light
       attenuated is defined as the opacity of
       the emission. Transparent stack
       emissions that do not attenuate light will
       have a transmittance of 100 percent or
       an opacity of zero percent. Opaque
       stack emissions that  attenuate all of the
      visible light will have a transmittance of
      zero percent or an opacity of 100
      percent.
        This  specification establishes specific
      design  criteria for the transmissometer
      system. Any opacity continuous
     .monitoring system that is expected to
      meet this specification is first checked to
      verify that the design specifications are
      met. Then, the opacity continuous
      monitoring system is calibrated,
      installed, an operated fora specified
      length of time. During this specified time
      period,  the system is evaluated to
      determine conformance with the
      established performance specifications.
      2. Definitions
        2.1 Continuous Monitoring System.
     The total equipment required for the
     determination of opacity. The system
     consists of the following major
     subsystems:
       ,2.1.1  Sample Interface. That portion
     of the system that protects the analyzer
     from the effects of the stack effluent and
     aids in keeping the optical surfaces
     clean.
       2.1.2  Analyzer. That portion  of the
     system that senses the pollutant and
     generates a signal otttput that is a
     function of the opacity.
       2.1.3   Data Recorder. That portion of
     the system that processes the analyzer
     output and provides a  permanent record
     of the output signal in terms of opacity.
     The data recorder may include
     automatic data reduction capabilities.
       2.2  Transmissometer. That portion of
     the system that includes the sample
     interface and the analyzer.
       2.3  Transmittance. The fraction of
     incident  light that is transmitted  through
     an optical medium.
      2.4 Opacity. The fraction of incident
     light that is attenuated by an optical
    medium.  Opacity (Op) and
     transmittance (Tr) are related by:
    Op=l-Tr.
         2.5  Optical Density. A logarithmic
       measure of the amount of incident light
       attenuated. Optical density (D) is
       related to the transmittance and opacity
       as follows:
       D= -log,. Tr= -log,. (1 -Op).
         2.6  Peak Spectral Response. The
       wavelength of maximum sensitivity of
       (he transmissometer.
         2.7  Mean Spectral Response. The
       wavelength which bisects the total area
       under the effective spectral response
       curve of the transmissometer.
        2.8  Angle of View. The angle that
      contains all of the radiation detected by
      the photodetector assembly of the
      analyzer at a level greater than 2.5
      percent of the peak detector response.
        2.9  Angle of Projection. The angle
      that contains all of the  radiation
      projected from the lamp assembly of Ihe
      analyzer at a level of greater than 2.5
      percent of the peak illuminate.
        2.10  Span Value. The opacity value
      at which the continuous monitoring
      system is set to produce the maximum
      data display output as specified in the
      applicable subpart.
        2.11  Upscale Calibration Value. The
      opacity value at which a calibration
      check of the  monitoring system is
      performed by simulating an upscale
      opacity condition  as viewed by the
      receiver.
       2.12  Calibration Error. The
      difference between the opacity values
      indicated by  the continuous monitoring
      system and the known values of a series
     of calibration attenuators (fillers or
     screens).
       2.13  Zero Drift. The difference in
     continuous monitoring system output
     readings before and after a stated period
     of normal continuous operation during
     which no unscheduled maintenance,
     repair, or adjustment took place and
     when the opacity (simulated) at the time
     of the measurements was zero.
       2.14  CaJibralion Drift. The difference
     in the continuous monitoring system
     output readings* before and after a staled
     period of normal continuous operation
     during which  no unscheduled
     maintenance, repair, or adjustment look
     place and when the opacity (simulated)
     at Ihe time of the measurements was th*
     same known upscale calibration value.
       2.15  Response Time. The amount of
     time it takes the continuous monitoring
     system to display on the  data recorder
     95 percent of a step change in opacity.
       2.16  Conditioning Period. A period of
     time (168 hours minimum) during which
     the continuous monitoring ayslem i)
     operated without unscheduled
     maintenance, repair, or adjustment pno'
     lo initiation of the operational lest
    period.
                                                      11-102
    

    -------
          2.17  Operational Test Period. A
        period of time (168 hours) during which
        the continuous monitoring system is
        expected to operate within the
        established performance specifications
        without any unscheduled maintenance.
        repair, or adjustment.
          2.18  Pathlength. The depth of
        effluent in the light beam between the
        receiver and the transmitter of a single-
        pass trar.smissometer. or the depth of
        effluent between the transceiver and
        reflector of a double-pass
        transmissometer. Two pathlengths are
        referenced by this Specification as
        follows:
         2.18,1   Monitor Pathlength. The
       palhlength at the installed location of
       the continuous monitoring system.
         2.18.2   Emission Outlet Pathlength.
       The pathlength at the location where
       emissions are released to the
       atmosphere.
         4. Installation Specifications
       3. Apparatus
         3.1  Continuous Monitoring System.
       Use any continuous monitoring system
       for opacity which is expected to meet
       the design specifications in Section 5
       and the performance specifications in
       Section 7. The data recorder may be an
       analog strip chart recorder type or other
       suitable device with an input signal
      range compatible with the analyzer
      output
        3.2 Calibration Attenuators. Use
      optical filters with neutral spectral
      characteristics or screens known to
      produce specified optical densities to
      visible light. The attenuators must be of
      sufficient size  to attenuate the entire
      light beam of the transmissomeler.
      Select and calibrate a minimum of three
      attenuators according to the procedures
      in Sections 8.1.2. and 8.1.3.
       3.3  Upscale Calibration Value
      Attenuator. Use an optical filter with
      neutral spectral characteristics,  a
     screen, or other device that produces an
     opacity value (corrected for pathlength,
     if necessary) that is greater than the sum
     of the applicable opacity standard and
     one-fourth of the difference between the
     opacity standard and the instrument
     span value, but less than the sum of the
     opacity standard and one-half of the
     difference between the opacity standard
     and the instrument span value.
       3.4   Calibration Spectrophotometer.
    To calibrate the calibration attenuators
    use a laboratory spectrophotometer
    meeting the following minimum design
    specification:
                        . 400-TOO («
                        . S l(T
                        . S OS pet »»nt/Twunc*
           Install the continuous monitoring
         system where the opacity measurements
         are representative of the total emissions
         from the affected facility. Use a
         measurement path that represents the
         average opacity over the cross section.
        Those requirements can be met as
        follows:
          4.1   Measurement Location. Select a
        measurement location that is (a)
        downstream from all particulate control
        equipment; (bj where condensed water
        vapor is not present: (c) accessible in
        order to permit routine maintenance;
        and (d) free of interference from
        ambient light (applicable only if
        transmissometer is responsive to
        ambient light).
         4.2 Measurement Path. Select a
        measurement path that passes through
        the cenlroid of the cross section.
       Additional requirements or
       modifications must be met for certain
       locations as follows:
         4.2.1  If the location is in a straight
       vertical section of stack or duct and is
       less than 4 equivalent diameters
       downstream or 1 equivalent diameter
       upstream from a bend, use a path that is
       in the plane defined by the bend.
         4.2.2   If the location is in a vertical
       section of stack or duct and is less than
       4 diameters downstream and 1 diameter
       upstream from a bend, use  a path in the
      plane defined by the bend upstream of
      the transmissometer.
        4.2.3  If the location is in a horizontal
      section of duct and is at least 4
      diameters downstream from a vertical
      bend, use  a path in the horizontal plane
      that is one-third the distance up the
      vertical axis from the bottom of the duct.
        4.2.4 If the location is in a horizontal
      section of duct and is less than 4
      diameters  downstream from a vertical
      bend, use a path in the horizontal plane
      that is two-thirds the distance up the
      vertical axis from the bottom of the duct
      for upward flow in the vertical section,
      and one-third the  distance up the
     vertical axis from the bottom of the duct
     for downward flow.
       4.3   Alternate Locations and
     Measurement Paths. Other locations and
     measurement paths may be selected by
     demonstrating to the Administrator that
     the average opacity measured at the
     alternate location or path is equivalent
     (± 10 percent) to the opacity as
     measured at a location meeting the
     criteria of Sections 4.1 and 4.2. To
     conduct this demonstration, measure the
     opacities at the two locations or paths
     for a minimum period of two hours The
     opacities of the two locations or paths
    may be measured at different times but
         must be measured at the same process
         operating conditions.
         5. Design Specifications
          Continuous monitoring systems for
         opacity must comply with the following
        design specifications:
          5.1   Optics.
          5.1.1  Spectral Response. The peak
        and mean spectral responses will occur
        between 515 nm and 585 nm. The
        response at any wavelength below 400
        nm or above 700 nm will be less than 10
        percent of the peak spectral response.
          5.1.2  Angle of View. The total angle
        of view will be no greater than 4
        degrees.
         5.1.3   Angle of Projection. The total
        angle of projection will be no greater
        than 4 degrees.
         5.2   Optical Alignment sight. Each
       analyzer will provide some method for
       visually determining that the instrument
       is optically aligned. The system
       provided will be  capable of indicating
       that the unit is misaligned when an error
       of ± 2 percent opacity occurs due to
       misalignment at a monitor pathlength of
       eight (8) meters.
         5.3   Simulated Zero and Upscale
       Calibration System. Each analyzer will
       include a system  for simulating a zero
       opacity and an upscale opacity value for
       the purpose of performing periodic
      checks of the transmissometer
      calibration while  on an operating stack
      or duct. This calibration system will
      provide, as a minimum, a system check
      of the analyzer internal optics and all
      electronic circuitry including the lamp
      and photodetector assembly.
        5.4  Access  to External Optics. Each
      analyzer will provide a means of access
      to the optical surfaces exposed to the
      effluent stream in order to permit the
      surfaces to be cleaned without requiring
      removal of the unit from the source
      mounting or without requiring optical
      realignment of the  unit.
        5.5 Automatic Zero Compensation
     Indicator. If the monitoring system has a
     feature which provides automatic zero
     compensation for dirt accumulation on
     exposed optical surfaces, the system
     will also provide some means of
     indicating that a compensation of
     4 + 0.5 percent opacity has been
     exceeded; this indicator shall be at a
     location accessible to the  operator (e.g..
     the data output termini!). During the
     operational test period, the system musl
     provide some  means for determining the
     actual amount of zero compensation at
     the .specified 24-hour intervals so that
     the actual 24-hour zero drift can be
     determined (see Section 8.4.1).
      5.6 Slotted Tube. For
     transmissometers that use slotted tubes,
    the length of the  slotted portion(s) must
                                                      II-103
    

    -------
       b« equal to or greater than 90 percent of
       the monitor pathlength. and  the slotted
       tube must be of sufficient size and
       orientation so as not to interfere with
       the free flow of effluent through the
       entire optical volume of the
       Iransmissometer pholodetector. The
       manufacturer must also show that the
       Iransmissometer uses appropriate
       methods to minimize light reflections: as
       a minimum, (his demonstration shall
       consist of laboratory operation of the
       transmissometerboth with and without
       the slotted  tube in position. Should the
       operator desire to use a slotted tube
       design with a slotted portion equal to
       less than 90 percent of the monitor
       pathlength. the operator must
       demonstrate to the Administrator thai
       acceptable  results can be obtained. As a
       minimum demonstration, the  effluent
       opacity shall be measured using both
       the slotted tube instrument and another
       instrument meeting the requirement of
       this specification but not of the slotted
       tube design. The measurements must be
       made at the same location and at the
      same process operating conditions for a-
      minimum period of two hours with each
      instrument. The shorter slotted tube may
      be used if the average opacity measured
      is equivalent (± 10 percent) to the
      opacity measured by the non-slotted
      lube design.
    
      6. Optical Design Specifications
      Verifciation  Procedure.
       These procedures will not be
      applicable to all designs and will require
      modification in some cases; all
      modifications are subject to the
      approval of the Administrator.
       Test each analyzer for conformance
      with the design specifications  of
     Sections 5.1 and 5.2 or obtain a
     certificate of conformance from the
     analyzer manufacturer as follows:
       6.1  Spectral Response. Obtain
     detector response, lamp emissivity and
     filter Iransmiltance data for the
     components used in the measurement
     system from their respective
     manufacturers.
       6.2  Angle  of View. Set up the
     receiver as specified by the
     manufacturer's written instructions.
     Draw an arc with  radius of 3 meters in
     the horizontal direction. Using a small
     (less than 3 centimeters) non-directiona.1
     light source, measure the receiver
     response at 4-centimeter intervals on the
     arc for 24 centimeters on either side of
     the detector centerline. Repeat  the test
    in the vertical direction.
      6.3  Angle of Projection. Set up the
    projector as specified by the
    manufacturer's written instructions.
    Draw an arc with radius of 3 meters in
    the horizontal direction. Using a small
       (less than 3 centimeters) photoelectric
       light detector, measure the light
       intensity at 4-centimeter intervals on the
       arc for 24 centimeters on either side of
       the light source centerline of projection.
       Repeat the test in the vertical direction.
         8.4  Optical Alignment Sight. In the
       laboratory set up the instrument as
       specified by the manufacturers written
       instructions for a monitor pathlength of
       8 meters. Assure that the instrument has
       been properly aligned and that a proper
       zero and span have been obtained.
       Insert an attenuator of 10 percent
       (nominal) opacity into the instrument
       pathlength. Slowly misalign the
       projector unit until a positive or negative
       shift of two percent opacity is obtained
      by the data  recorder. Then, following
      the manufacturer's written instructions,
      check the alignment and assure that the
      alignment procedure does in  fact
      indicate that the instrument is
      misaligned. Realign the instrument and
      follow the same procedure for checking
      misalignment of the receiver or
      retroreflector unit
        T»Mc 1-1.—
        6.5  Manufacturer's Certificate of
     Conformance (Alternative to above).
     Obtain from the manufacturer a
     certificate of conformance which
     certifies that the first analyzer randomly
     sampled from each month's production
     was tested according to Sections 6.1
     through 6.3 and satisfactorily met all
     requirements of Section 5 of this
     Specification. If any of the requirements
     were not met. the certificate must state
     that  the entire month's analyzer-
     production was resampled according to
     the military standard  105D sampling
     procedure (MIL-STTM05D) inspection
     level II; was retested for each of the
     applicable requirements under Section 5
     of this Specification: and was
     determined to be acceptable under MIL-
     STD-105D procedures, acceptable
     quality level 1.0. The certificate of
     conformance must include the results of
     each test performed for the analyzer(s)
     sampled during the month the analyzer
     being installed was produced.
    
     7. Performance Specifications
    
      The opacity continuous monitoring
    system performance specifications  are
    listed in Table 1-1.
    
         TaW« \-\.—
       7. Data *vcarc*«*
    . S J pet mo*
    . S 0 50 pa ol M KJ,
       •pan *•!•*.
                             maag n« eofditorwg and operational toil ptrvdi. ^
              trvr^omj syHem X\ai no< »
               . r«ea«. rapJ«c**ri«n|.
       tful ctearty cp*ol>*d js rcgtjn* and raquvad in
       8. Performance Specification
       Verification Procedure
         Test each continuous monitoring
       system that conforms to the design
       specifications (Section  5) using the
       following procedures to determine
       conformance with the performance
       specifications of Section 7,
        8.1  Preliminary Adjustments and
      Tests. Prior to installation of the syslero
      on the stack, perform these steps ortesli
      at the affected facility or in the
      manufacturer's laboratory.
        8.1.1  Equipment Preparation. Set up
      and calibrate the monitoring system for
      the monitor pathlength to be used in the
      installation as specified by the
      manufacturer's written instructions. If
      the monitoring system has automatic
      pathlength  adjustment, follow the
      manufacturer's instructions to adjust (he
      signal output from the analyzer to
      equivalent values based on the emission
      outlet pathlength. Set the span a! the
      value specified in the applicable
      subpart. At this time perform the zero
      alignment by balancing the responseol
      the continuous monitoring system so
      that the simulated zero check coincide!
      with the actual zero check performed
      across the simulated monitor pathlenglk.
     Then,  assure that the upscale calibration
     value is within the required opacity
     range (Section 3.3).
       8.1.2 Calibrated Attenuator
     Selection. Based on the span value
     specified in  the applicable subpart,
     select a minimum of three calibrated
     attenuators  (low, mid. and high range)
     using Table  1-2. If the'system is
     operating with automatic palhlenglh
     compensation, calculates the attenuator
     values required to obtain a  system
     response equivalent to the applicable
     values shown in Table 1-2: use equation
     1-1 for the conversion. A  series of fill"1
     with nominal optical density (opacity)
     values  of 0.1(20). 0.2(37). 0.3(50). 0.4(60),
    0.5{6a). 0-6(75). 0.7(80). O^B^J. 0.9(88).
    and 1.0(90) are commercially available.
    Within this limitation of filter
    availability, select the calibrated
                                                        11-104
    

    -------
      attenuators having the values given in
      Table 1-2 or having values closest to
      those calculated by Equation 1-1.
      Tibl« 1-2.—Requred C*l!braled AltenvalotValues
                     (Nomnal)
    
    
                          C*U»t«d  (87*)
    
        D, = D, (L./U)       Equation 1-1
      Where:
        Di = Nominal optical density value of
         required mid. low. or high range
         calibration attenuators.
        0.= Desired attenuator optical density
         output value from Table 1-2 at the span
         required by the applicable subparL
        Li = Monitor palhlength.
        L, = Emission outlet palhlength.
        8.1.3  Attenuator Calibration.
      Calibrate the required filters or screens
      using a laboratory spectrophotomeler
      meeting the specifications of Section 3.4
      to measure the transmittance in the 400
      to 700 nm wavelength  range; make
      measurements at wavelength intervals
      of 20 nm or less. As  an alternate
      procedure use an instrument meeting the
      specifications of Section 3.4 to measure
      the C.I.E. Daylightc Luminous
      Transmittance of the attenuators. During
      the calibration procedure assure that a
      minimum of 75 percent of the total area
      of the attenuator is checked. The
     attenuator manufacturer must specify
     the period of lime over which the
     attenuator values can be considered
     stable, as well as any special handling
     and storing procedures required to
     enhance attenuator stability. To assure
     stability, attenuator values must be
     rechecked at intervals less than or equal
     to the period of stability guaranteed by
     the manufacturer. However, values must
     be  rechecked at least every 3 months. If
     desired, t^^-stability  checks may be
     performed on an instrument other  than
     that initially used for the attenuator
     calibration (Section 3.4). However, if a
     different instrument is used, the
     instrument shall be a high quality
     laboratory transmissometer or
     spectrophotomeler and  the same
     instrument shall always be used for the
     stability checks. If a secondary
     instrument is to be used for stability
     checks, the value of the  calibrated
    attenuator shall be measured on this
    secondary instrument immediately
    following calibration  and prior to being
    used. If over a period  time an attenuator
       value changes by more than ±2 percent
       opacity, it shall be recalibrated or
       replaced by a new attenuator.
        If this procedure is conducted by the
       filter or screen manufacturer or
       independent laboratory, obtain a
       statement certifying the values and that
       the specified procedure, or equivalent,
       was used.
        8.1.4  -Calibration Error Test Insert
       the calibrated attenuators (low, mid, and
       high range) in the transmissometer path
       al or as near to the midpoint as feasible.
      The attenuator must be placed in the
      measurement path at a point where the
      effluent will be-measured: i.e.. do not
      place the calibrated attenuator in the
      instrument housing. While inserting the
      attenuator, assure that the entire
      projected beam will pass  through the
      attenuator and that the attenuator is
      inserted in a manner which minimizes
      interference from reflected light. Make a
      total of five nonconsecutive readings for
      each filter. Record the monitoring
      system output readings in  percent
      opacity (see example Figure 1-1).
        8.1.5   System Response Test. Insert
      the high-range calibrated attenuator in
      the transmissometer path  five times and
      record the time required for the system
      to respond to 95 percent of final zero
      and  high-range filter values (see
      example Figure 1-2).
       8.2  Preliminary Field Adjustments.
      Install the continuous monitoring system
     on the affected facility according to the
     manufacturer's written instructions and
     perform the following preliminary
     adjustments:
       8.2.1   Optical and Zero  Alignment.
     When the facility is not in  operation,
     conduct the optical alignment by
     aligning the light beam'from the
     transmissometer upon the  optical
     surface located across the  duct or stack
     (i.e..  the retroflector or photodetector, as
     applicable) in accordance with the
     manufacturer's instructions. Under dear
     stack conditions, verify the zero
     alignment (performed in Section 8.1.1)
     by assuring that the monitoring system
     response for the simulated  zero check
     coincides with  the actual zero measured
     by the transraissometer across the dear
     stack. Adjust the zero alignment, if
     necessary. Then, after the affected
     facility has been started up and the
     effluent stream reaches normal
     operating temperature, recheck the
     optical alignment. If the optical
     alignment has shifted realign the optics.
       8.2.2  Optical and Zero Alignment
     (Alternative Procedure). If the facility is
     already on line  and a zero stack
     condition cannot practicably be
     obtained, use th,e zero alignment
    obtained during the preliminary
    adjustments (Section 8.1.1)  prior to
      installation of the Iransmissometer on
      the slack. After completing all the
      preliminary adjustments and tests
      'required in Section 8.1. install the
      system at the source and align the
      optics, i.e., align the light beam from the
      transmissometer  upon the optical
      surface located across the duct or stack
      in accordance with the manufacturer's
      instruction. The zero alignment
      conducted in this manner shall be
      verified and adjusted if necessary, the
      first time the facility is not in operation
      after the operational test period has
      been completed.
        8.3   Conditioning Period. After
      completing the preliminary field
      adjustments (Section 8.2), operate the
      system according to the manufacturer's
      instructions for an initial conditioning
      period of not less  than 1&8 hours while
      the source is operating. Except during
      times of instrument zero and upscale
      calibration checks, the continuous
      monitoring system will  analyze the
      effluent gas for opacity and produce a
      permanent record of the continuous
      monitoring system output. During this
      conditioning period there shall be no
      unscheduled maintenance, repair, or
      adjustment. Conduct daily zero
      calibration and upscale calibration
      checks, and. when accumulated drift
      exceeds the daily operating limits, make
      adjustments and/or clean the exposed
      optical surfaces. The data recorder shall
      reflect these checks and adjustments. At
      the end  of the operational test period.
     verify that the instrument optical
     alignment is correct. If the conditioning
     period is interrupted because of source
     breakdown (record the dates and times
     of process shutdown), continue the 168-
     hour period following resumption of
     source operation. If the conditioning
     period is interrupted because of monitor
     failure, restart the 168-hour conditioning
     period when the monitor becomes
     operational.
      8.4  Operational Test Period. After
     completing the conditioning period
     operate the system for an additional
     168-hour period. It is not necessary that
     the 168-hour operational test period
     immediately follow the 168-hour
     conditioning period. Except during times
     of instrument zero and upscale
     calibration checks. th« continuous
     monitoring system will analyze the
     effluent gas for opacfry and will produce
     a permanent record of the continuous
     monitoring system output. During this
     period, there will be no unscheduled
     maintenance, repair, or adjustment. Zero
     and  calibration adjustments, optical
     surface cleaning, and optical
    realignment may be performed
    (optional) only at 24-hour intervals or at
                                                     11-105
    

    -------
      such shorter intervals as (he
      manufacturer's written instructions
      specify. Automatic zero and calibration
      adjustments made by the monitoring
      system without operator intervention or
      initiation are followable at any time. If
      the operational lest period is interrupted
      because of source breakdown, continue
      Ihe left-hour period following
      resumption of source operation. If the
      tesl jwriod is interrupted because of
      monitor failure, restart the 168-hour
      period when the monitor becomes
      operational. During the operational test
      period, perform the following test
      procedures:-
        8.4.1  Zero Drift Test. At the outset of
      the 168-hour operational test period,
      record the initial simulated zero and
      upscale opacity readings (see example
      Figure 1-3). After each 24-hour interval
      check and record the  final zero reading
      before any optional or required cleaning
      and adjustment. Zero and upscale
      calibration adjustments, optical surface
      cleaning, and optical realignment may
      be performed only at 24-hour intervals
      (or at such shorter intervals as the
      manufacturer's written instructions
      specify) but are optional. However,
      adjustments and/or cleaning must be
      performed when the accumulated zero
      calibration or upscale calibration drift
      exceeds the 24-hour drift specifications
      (±2 percent opacity).  If no adjustments
     are made after the zero check the final
     zero reading is recorded as the initial
     reading for the next 24-hour period. If
     adjustments are made, the zero value
     after adjustment is recorded as  the
     initial zero value for the next 24-hour
     period. If the instrument has an
     automatic zero compensation feature for
     dirt accumulation on exposed lens, and
     the zero value cannot be measured
     before compensation is entered  then
     record the  amount of automatic zero
     compensation for the final zero reading
     of each 24-hour period. (List the
     indicated zero values of the monitoring
     system in parenthesis.)
      8.4.2  Upscale Drift Test/At each 24-
     hour interval, after the zero calibration
     value has been checked and any
     optional or required adjustments have
     been made, check and  record the
     simulated upscale calibration value. If
     no further adjustments are made to the
     calibration system at this time, the final
     upscale calibration value is recorded as
     the initial upscale  value for the next 24-
    hour period. If an instrument span
    adjustment is made, the upscale  value
    after adjustment is recorded as the
    Initial upscale for the next 24-hour
    period.
        During the operational test period
      record all adjustments, realignments and
      lens cleanings.
      9. Calculation, Data Analysis, and
      Reporting
        9.1   Arithmetic Mean. Calculate the
      mean of a set of data as follows:
    i ;
    n i-i
                            2-1
      Where:
       ~x = mean value.
       n = number of data points.
       Ix, = algebraic turn of the individual
         measurement!, x,
       9.2  Confidence Interval. Calculate
      the 95 percent confidence interval (two-
      sided) as follows:
             l.97S
                              EqiMtlon ?-?
    
     Where:
       Cl.n = 95 percent confidence interval
         estimate of the average mean value.
       '.975 = '(lr-a/2).
    
                Table 1-3— '375 Values
             '.97S
                                       '.975
    3
    3
    4
    s
    6
    12706
    4303
    3182
    2.778
    2.S71
    7
    a
    9
    to
    It
    2«7
    2385
    2306
    2262
    2.228
    12
    13
    14
    IS
    16
    2.201
    2.179
    2 160
    2145
    2131
       The values in this table are already
     corrected for n-1 degrees of Freedom.
     Use n equal to the number of data
     points.
       9.3  Conversion of Opacity Values
     from Monitor Pathlength to Emission
     Outlet Pathlength. When the monitor
     pathlength is different than the emisson
     outlet pathlength. use either of the
     following equations to convert from one
     basis to the other (this conversion may
     be automatically calculated by the
     monitoring system):
     log(1-Op,) = (L,/L.) Log (l-Op.)  Equation 1-4
      D, = (WL.)          Equation 1-S
     Where:
      Op, = opacity of the effluent based upon L,
      Op, = opacity of the effluent based upon L,
      Li = monitor palhlenglh
      L, = emission outlet palhlenglh
      Di = optical density of the effluent based
        upon U
      D, = optical densily-of the effleunt based
        upon U
      9.4   Spectral Response. Using the
    spectral  data obtained in Section 6.1,
    develop  Ihe effective  spectral response
    curve of the transmissomeler. Then
    determine and report the peak spectral
    response wavelength, the mean spectral
      response wavelength, and the maximum
      response at any wavelength below 400
      nm and above 700 nm expressed as a
      percentage of the peak response.
        9.5   Angle of View. For the horizontal
      and vertical directions, using the dala.
      obtained in Section 6.2, calculate the
      response of the receiver as a function of
      viewing angle (21 centimeters of arc
      with a radius of 3 meters equal 4
      degrees), report relative angle of view
      curves, and determine and report the
      angle of view.
        9.6  Angle of Projection. For the
      horizontal and vertical directions, using
      the data obtained in Section 6.3,
      calculate the response of the
      photoelectric detector as  a function of
      projection angle, report relative angle of
      projection curves, and determine and
     report the  angle of projection.
       9.7  Calibration Error.  See Figure 1-1,
      If the pathlength is not adjusted by the
     measurement system, subtract the
     actual calibrated attenuator value from
     the value indicated by the measurement
     system recorder for each of the 15
     readings obtained pursuant to Section
     8.1.4. If the pathlength is adjusted by Ihe
     measurement system subtract the "path
     adjusted" calibrated attenuator values
     from the values indecated by the
     measurement system recorder the "path
     adjusted" calibrated attenuator values
     are calculated using equation 1-4 orl-
     5). Calculate the arithmetic mean
     difference and the 95 percent confidence
     interval of  the five tests at each
     attenuator  value using Equations 1-2
     and 1-3. Calculate the sum of the
     absolute value of the mean difference
     and the 95 percent confidence interval
     for each of the three test attenuators;
     report these three values as the
     calibration error.
      9.8  Zero and Upscale Calibration
     Drifts. Using the data obtained in
     Sections 8.4.1 and 8.4.2 calculate the
     zero and upscale calibration drifts. Then
     calculate the arithmetic means and the
     95 percent confidence intervals using
     Equations 1-2 and 1-3. Calculate the
     sum of the absolute value of the mean
     and the 95 percent confidence interval
     and report these values as the 24-hour
     zero drift and the 24-hour calibration
     drift.
      9.9  "Response Time. Using the data
     collected in Section 8.1.5, calculate the
     mean time of the 10 upscale and
     downscale  tests and report this values)
     the system response time.
      9.10  Reporting. Report  the following
    [summarize in tabular form where
    appropriate).
      9.10.1  General Information.
      a. Instrument Manufacturer.
      b. Instrument Model Number.
      c, Instrument Serial Number.
                                                      11-106
    

    -------
        d. Person(s) responsible for
      operational and conditioning test
      periods and affiliation.
        e. Facility being monitored.
        f. Schematic of monitoring system
      measurement path location.
        g. Monitor pathleogth. meters.
        h. Emission outlet palhlength, meters.
        i. System span value, percent opacity.
        j. Upscale calibration value, percent
      opacity.
        k. Calibrated Attenuator values (low.
      mid. and high range), percent opacity.
        9.10.2  Design Specification Test
      Results
        a. Peak spectral response, nrn.
        b. Mean spectral response, nm.
        c. Response above 700 nm. percent of
      peak.
        d. Response below 400 nm, percent of
      peak.
        e. Total angle of view, degrees.
        f. Total angle of projection, degrees.
        9.10.3 Operational Test Period
      Results.
        a. Calibration error, high-range.
      percent opacity.
        b. Calibration error, mid-range.
      percent opacity.
        c. Calibration error, low-range.
      percent opacity.
        d. Response time, seconds.
        e. 24-hour zero drift, percent opacity.
        f. 24-hour calibration drift, percent
     opacity.
       g.  Lens cleaning, clock time.
       h.  Optical alignment adjustment, clock
     time.
       9.10.4  Statements. Provide a
     statement that the conditioning and
     operational test periods were completed
     according to the requirements of
     Sections 8.3 and 8.4. In this statement.
     include the time periods during which
     the conditioning and operaUonaJ test
     periods were conducted.
       9.10-5  Appendix. Provide the data
     tabulations and calculations for the
     above tabulated results.
       9.11  Retest. If the continuous
     monitoring system operates within the
     specified performance parameters of
     Table 1-1. the operational lest period
     will be successfully concluded. If the
     continuous monitoring system fails to
     meet any of the specified performance
    parameters, repeal the operational test
    period with a system that meets the
    design specifications and is expected to
    meet the performance  specifications.
      10.  Bibliograpny.
      10.1  "Experimental Statistics."
    Department of Commerce. National
    Bureau of Standards Handbook 91. 1963,
    pp. 3-31. paragraphs 3-3.1.4.
      10.2  "Performance Specifications For
    Stationary-Source Monitoring Systems
    for Cases and Visible Emissions,"
    Environmental Protection Agency,
    Research Triangle Park. N. C.. EPA-650/
    2-74-013. January 1974.
                                                   11-107
    

    -------
    —- 	
    Person Cor
    Affiliation
    Date 	 —
    Monitor PC
    Monitoring
    Calibrated
    Actual <
    Lov
    Mic
    Hig
    Run
    Number
    1 — Low
    2- Mid
    3 - High
    4 - Low
    5 - Mid
    6 - High
    7 — Low
    8 -Mid
    9 - High
    10- Low
    11-Mid
    12-High
    13-Low
    14-Mid
    15-High
    iducting TPIT Analyzer Manufarturpr
    Model/Serial Nn
    Location 	 	
    thlength Li Fmi««nn Outlet Pathlervjthj 1. 3 	 • 	
    System Output Pathlength Corrected? Yes 	 No 	
    Neutral Density Filter Values
    Dptical Density (Opacity): Path Adjusted Optical Density (opacity)
    A/ Rann*> ( 1 1 nuu Range " { I
    1 RgprjP ( ) Mid P?"n<» {
    h Rantjp ( ) W!0h Rang'o f
    
    Calibration Filter
    Value
    (Pgth Adjusted Percent Opacity)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Equation 1 — 2): A
    Confidence Interval (Equation 1 — 3): B
    Calibration Error JAJ + lei
    Instrument Reading
    (Percent Opacity)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    	 )
    	 )
    
    Arithmetic Difference
    (% Opacity)
    Low
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    X
    
    
    
    Mid
    —
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    
    —
    —
    —
    /*\
    1-
    
    
    High
    -
    -
    
    -
    -
    
    -
    -
    
    -
    -
    
    	 -
    
    X
    
    
    
    
    Figure 1 — 1. Calibration error determination
                11-108
    

    -------
    Person Conducting Test	Analyzer Manufacturer
    Affiliation	.	   Model/Serial No.	
    Date	   Location	
    High Range Calibration Filter Value:         Actual Optical Density (Opacity).
                                             Path Adjusted Optical Density  (Opacity).
    
    
    Upscale Response Value ( 0.95 x filter value)	percent opacity
    Downscale Response Value (0.05 x filter value)	percent opacity
               Upscale                       1 	seconds
                                            2 	seconds
                                            3 	 seconds
                                            4 	-seconds
                                            5 	
               Downscale                    1  	
                                            4
                                            5 	seconds
                            Average response   	 seconds
                                 Figure 1-2. Response Time Determination
                                             11-109
    

    -------
    
    Perso
    Affili
    n Conducting Te
    ct , Ar
    Mt
    1 n
    lalyzer Mar
    xdel/ Serial
    cation —
    lufacturer
    No
    
    
    
    Date 	 :_ — __— — ^ — —
    Monitor Pathlength, L
    Monitoring System Ou
    Upscale Cal oration V«
    Date
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Time
    Begin
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    F
    1 	 	 	
    tput Pathlength Correctec
    lue : Actual Optical Den
    Path Adjusted Opt"
    mission Oi
    :? Ye
    sity (Opac
    cal Density
    /tlet Pathle
    s 	 1
    itv)
    i (Opacity)
    nfjth L2 - . 	
    VJO 	
    { )
    { )
    
    
    Percent Opacity
    Zero Reading*
    Initial
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 1—2)
    Final
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 1-3)
    Zero Drift
    
    Zero
    Drift
    C = B-A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    adjusted?
    e
    a>
    N
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Upscale Calibration
    Reading
    Initial
    0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Final
    E
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Upscale
    Drift
    F = E-D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Calibration Drift
    Cali-
    bration
    Drift
    G = F-C"
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    adjusted?
    c
    (0
    a
    f>
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    | lens cleaned?
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Align-
    ment
    checked?
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    adjusted?
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    -^
    'without automatic zero compensation ~
    **if zero was adjusted (manually or automatically)
    prior to upscale check, then use c = 0 .
    Figure 1-3. Zero Calibration Drift Determination
                   11-110
    

    -------
     Performance Specification 2—
     Specifications and Test Procedures for
     SO, and NO, Continuous Monitoring
     Systems in Stationary Sources
     1. Applicability and Principle
       1.1  Applicability. This Specification
     contains [a] installation requirements,
     (b)  instrument performance and
     equipment specifications, and (c) test
     procedures and data reduction
     procedures for evaluating.the
     acceptability of SOj and NO, continuous
     monitoring systems, which may include.
     for  certain stationary  sources, diluent
     monitors. The,test procedures in item
     (c),  above, are not applicable to single-
     pass, in-situ continuous  monitoring
     systems; these systems will be
     evaluated on a case-by-case basis upon
     written request to the Administrator and
     alternative test procedures will be
     issued separately.
       1.2  Principle. Any  S05 or NO,
     continuous monitoring system that is
     expected  to meet this  Specification is
     installed,  calibrated, and operated for a
     specified length of time.  During this
     specified time period,  the continuous
     monitoring system is evaluated to
     determine conformance with the
     Specification.
    
     2. Definitions
       2.1   Continuous Monitoring System.
     The total equipment required for the
     determination of a gas concentration or
     a gas emission rate. The  system consists
     of the following major sub-systems:
       2.1.1  Sample Interface, That portion
     of a system that is used for one or more
     of the following: sample acquisition,
     sample transportation, sample
     conditioning, or protection of the
     monitor from the  effects of the stack
     effluent.
      2.1.2.  Pollutant Analyzer. That
     portion of  the system that senses the
     pollutant gas and generates an output
     that  is proportional to the gas
     concentration.
      2.1.3.  Diluent Analyzer {if
     applicable). That portion  of the system
     that  senses the diluent  gas (e.g.. COt or
     Oi) and generates  an output that is
     proportional to the gas  concentration.
      2.1.4   Data Recorder. That portion of
     the monitoring system that provides a
     permanent record  of the analyzer
     output. The data recorder may include
     automatic data reduction capabilities.
      2.2  Types of Monitors. Continuous
     monitors are categorized  as "extractive"
     or "in-situ." which are further
    categorized as "point," "multipoint,"
     "limited-path." and "path" type
    monitors or as "single-pass" or "double-
    pass" type monitors.
        2.2.1   Extractive Monitor. One that
      withdraws a gas sample from the slack
      and transports the sample to the
      analyzer.
        2.2.2   In-situ Monitor. One that
      senses the gas concentration in the
      stack environment and does not extract
      a sample for analysis.
        2-2.3   Point Monitor. One that
      measures the gas concentration either at
      a single point or along a path which is
      less than 10 percent of the length of a
      specified measurement line.
        2.2.4   Multipoint Monitor. One that
      measures the gas  concentration at 2 or
      more points.
       2.2.5   Limited-Path Monitor. One  that
      measures the gas  concentration along a
      path, which  is 10 to 90 percent of the
      length of a specified measurement line.
       2-2.6   Path Monitor. One that
      measures the gas  concentration along a
      path, which  is greater-than 90 percent of
      the length of a specified measurement
      line.
       23.7  Single-Pass Monitor. One that
      has the transmitter and the detector on
     opposite  sides of the stack or duct.
       2.2.8   Double-Pass Monitor. One that
     has the transmitter and the detector on
     the same side of the stack or duct.
       2.3  Span  Value. The upper limit of a
     gas concentration  measurement range
     which is specified for affected source
     categories in the applicable subpart of
     the regulations.
       2.4  Calibration Cases. A known
     concentration of a gas in an appropriate
     diluent gas.
       2.5  Calibration Gas Cells or Filters.
     A device  which, when inserted between
     the transmitter and detector of the
     analyzer, produces the desired output
     level on the data recorder.
       2.6  Relative Accuracy. The degree of
     correctness including analytical
     variations of the gas concentration or
     emission rate determined by the
     continuous monitoring system, relative
     to the value determined by the reference
     method(s).
      2.7 Calibration Error. The difference
     between the gas concentration indicated
     by the continuous monitoring system
     and the known concentration of the
     calibration gas, gas cell, or filter.
      2.8 Zero Drift. The difference in the
     continuous monitoring system output
     readings before and after a stated period
     of operation during which no
     unscheduled maintenance, repair, or
     adjustment took place and when the
     pollutant concentration at the time of
     the measurements was zero (i.e., zero
    gas, or zero gas cell or filter).
      2.9 Calibration  Drift. The difference
     in the continuous monitoring system.
    output readings before and after a stated
    period of operation during which no
     unscheduled maintenance, repair or
     adjustment took place and when the
     pollutant concentration at the time of
     the measurements was a high-level
     value (i.e., calibration gas, gas cell or
     filter).
       2.10  Respons'e Time. The amount  of
     time it takes the continuous monitoring
     system to display on the data recorder
     95 percent of a step change in pollutant
     concentration,
       2.11   Conditioning Period. A
     minimum period of time over which the
     continuous monitoring system is
     expected to operate with no
     •unscheduled maintenance, repair, or
     adjustments prior to initiation of the
     operational test period.
       2.12  Operational Test Period. A
     minimum period of time over which the
     continuous monitoring system is
     expected to operate within the
     established performance specifications
     with no unscheduled maintenance,
     repair or adjustment
     3. Installation Specifications
       Install the continuous monitoring
     system at a location where the pollutant
     concentration measurements are
     representative of the total emissions
     from the affected facility and are
     representative of the concentration over
     the cross section. Both requirements can
     be met as follows:
       3.1  Measurement Location. Select  an
     accessible measurement location in the
     stack or ductwork that is at least 2
     equivalent diameters downstream  from
     the nearest control  device or other point
     at which a change in the pollutant
     concentration may occur and at least 0-5
     equivalent diameters upstream from the
     effluent exhaust. Individual subparts of
     the regulations may contain additional
     requirements. For example, for steam
     generating facilities, the location must
     be downstream of the air preheater.
       3.2  Measurement Points or Paths.
     There are two alternatives. The tester
     may choose either (a) to conduct the
     stratification check procedure given in
     Section 3.3 to select the point, points, or
     path of average gas concentration,  or (b)
     to use the options listed below without a
     stratification check.
      Note.—For the purpose of thij lection, the
     "centroidal area" is defined as a concentric
     area thai is geometrically similar to the stack
     cross section and is no greater than 1 percent
    of the alack crosi-»ec1iootl area.
      3.2.1  SO, and NO. Path Monitoring
    Systems. The tester may choose to
    centrally locate the  sample interface
    (path) of the monitoring system on a
    measurement line thai passes through
    the "centroidal area" of the cross
    section.
                                                     11-111
    

    -------
      3.2.2  SOi and NO, Multipoint
    Monitoring Systems. The tester may
    choose to space 3 measurement points
    along a measurement line that passes
    through the "centroidal area" of the
    stack cross sectinn, at distances of 16.7.
    50.0, and  83.3 percent of the way across
    it (see Figure 2-1).
                                                 11-112
    

    -------
           "CENTROIDAL
            AREA"
                                               POINT
                                                NO.
                                                 1
                                                 2
                                                 3
    DISTANCE
     (%OF L)
       16.7
       50.0
       833
         "CENTROIDAL
          AREA"
    2-1.  Location of an example measurement line (L) and measurement points.
                             11-113
    

    -------
         The following sampling strategies, or
       equivalent, for measuring the
       concentrations at the 3 points are
       acceptable: (a) The use of a 3-probe or a
       3-hole single probe arrangment.
       provided that the sampling rate in each
       of the 3 probes or holes is maintained
       within 10 percent of their average rate
       (This option requires a procedure.
       subject to the approval of the
       Administrator, to demonstrate that the
       proper sampling rate is maintained): or
       (b) the use of a traversing probe
       arrangement, provided that a
       measurement  at each point is made at
       least once every 15 minutes and all 3
       points are traversed and sampled for
       equal lengths of time within 15 minutes.
         3.2.3  SO, Single-Point and Limited-
       Path Monitoring Systems. Provided that
       (a) no "dissimilar" gas streams (i.e,
       having greater than 10 percent
       difference in pollutant concentration
       from the average) are combined
       upstream of the measurement location.
      and (b) for steam generating facilities, a
      CO, or O, cotinuous monitor is installed
      in  addition to the SOj monitor.
      according  to the guidelines given in
      Section 3.1 or 3.2 of Performance
      Specification 3, the tester may choose  to
      monitor SO, at  a single point or over a
      limited path. Locate the point in or
      centrally locate the limited path over the
      "centroidal area." Any  other location
      within the inner 50 percent of the stack
      cross-sectional  area that has been
      demonstrated (see Section 3.4) to have a
      concentration within 5 percent of the
      concentration at a point within the
      "centroidal area" may be used.
       3.2.4  NO. Single-Point and Limited-
     Path Monitoring Systems. For NO,
     monitors, the tester may choose the
     single-point or limited-path option
     described in Section 3.2.3 only in coal-
     buming steam generators (does not
     include oil and gas-fired units) and nitric
     acid plants, which have  no dissimilar
     gas  streams combining upstream of the
     measurement location.
       3.3  Stratification Check Procedure.
     Unless specifically approved in Section
     3.2..  conduct a stratification check and
     select the measurement point points, or
     path as follows:
       3.3.1  Locate 9 sample points, as
     shown in Figure 2-2, a or b. The tester
     may  choose  to use more than 9 points,
    provided that the sample points are
    located in a similar fashion as in Feure
    2-2.
       3.3.2  Measure at least twice the
     pollutant and. if applicable (as in the
     case of steam generators). CO, or O,
     concentrations at each of the sample
     points. Moisture need not be determined
     for this s.tep. The following methods are
     acceptable for the measurements: (a)
     Reference Methods 3 (grab-sample), 6 or
     7 of this part; (b) appropriate
     instrumental methods which give
     relative responses to the pollutant (i.e..
     the methods need not be absolutely
     correct), subject to  the approval of the
     Administrator or (c) alternative
     methods subject to the approval of the
     Administrator. Express all
     measurements, if applicable, in the units
     of the applicable standard.
      3.3.3  Calculate the mean value and
     select a point points, limited-path, or
     path which gives an equivalent value to
     the mean. The point or points must be
     within,  and the limited-path or path
     must pass through, the inner 50 percent
     of the stack cross-sectional area. All
     other locations must be approved by the
    Administrator.
                                                    11-114
    

    -------
    POINT
     NO.
    DISTANCE
     I* OF D)
     1.9
     2.8
     C
     3.7
     4.6
       10.0
       30.0
       50.0
       70.0
       90.0
                                                 Ul
                                                    •
                                                    2
                                                                   •
                                                                   9
                                                    (b)
                    Figure 2-2.  Location of 9 sampling points for stratification check.
                                               11-115
    

    -------
        3.4  Acceptability of Single Poinl or
      Limited Path Alternative Location. Any
      of the applicable measurement methods
      mentioned in Section 3.3.2. above, may
      be used. Measure -the pollutant and, if
      applicable. Cd or d concentrations at
      both the centroidal area and the
      alternative locations. Moisture need not
      be measured for this test. Collect a 21-
      minute integrated sample or 3 grab-
      samples, either at evenly spaced (7 ± 2
      min.) intervals over 21 minutes or all
      within 3 minutes, at  each location. Run
      the comparative.tests either
      concurrently or within 10 minutes of
      each other. Average the results of the  3
      grab-samples.
        Repeat the measurements until a
      minimum of 3 paired measurements
      spanning a minimum of 1.hour  of
      process operation are obtained.
      Determine the average pollutant
      concentrations at the centroidal area
      and  the alternative locations. If
      applicable, convert the data in  terms of
      the standard for each paired set before
      taking the average. The alternative
      sampling location is acceptable if each
      alternative location value is within ± 10
     percent of the corresponding centroidal
     area value and  if the average at the
     alternative location is within 5 percent
     of the average of the centroidal area.
    
     4. Performance  and Equipment
     Specifications
       The continuous monitoring system
     performance and equipment
     specifications are listed in Table 2-1. To
     be considered acceptable, the
     continuous monitoring system must
     demonstrate compliance with these
     specifications using the test procedures
     of Section 6.
    
     5. Apparatus
    
      5.1  Continuous Monitoring System.
     Use any continuous monitoring system
     of SOt or NO, which is expected to meet
     the specifications in Table 2-1. For
     sources which are required to convert
     the pollutant concentrations to other
     emission units using diluent gas
     measurements, the diluent gas
     continuous monitor, as described in
     Performance Specification 3 of this
     Appendix, is considered part of the
     continuous monitoring system. The data
    recorder may be an analog strip chart
    recorder type or other suitable device
    with an input signal range compatible
    with the analyzer output.
        5.2  Calibration Cases. For
      continuous monitoring systems that
      allow the introduction of calibration
      gases to the analyzer, the calibration
      gases may be SO» in air or N,. NO in N».
      and NOt in air or N,. Two or more
      calibration gases may be combined in
      the same gas cylinder, except do not
      combine the NO and air. For NO,
      monitoring systems that oxidize NO to
      NOj, the calibration gases must be in the
      form of NO. Use three calibration gas
      mixtures as specified below:
       5.2.1  High-Level Gas. A gas
      concentration that is equivalent to 80 to
      90 percent of the span value.
    
         T»ble 2-1.—Continuous Monitoring System
         Performance and Equipment Specifications
         Parameter
                             Specrftcauon
      I. CuriditJurWIQ
      penod*.
      2. Operaeonel l«sl
      period'.
      3. Cattratjon error •.
    
      4. Response lime	
    
      1 Zero dnfl la-
      bour)".
      6. Zero OWl (24-
      hour) •-•.
      7. CilCrjboo drifl
      (2-hour)'.
      9
      (24-hour) >.
      9.  Belalrve
      accuracy*.
     10  Calibration 911
      censor Wterv
     11.  Data reorder
      cfta/i resolution.
     12.  Extractive
    
      rrwnrtors.
    < S pet ol each mid-1*.«l and f~jn-
      tovel caMvamn value.
    < 15 mirmjtn (5 mwmtes tor 3-point
      lrav«rvng probe arrangement).
    < 2 pet ol span vaJue.
    
    < 2 pet of span value.
    
    < 2 pet ol span value.
    
    «• 2.5 pet ol span value,
    
    e; 20 pet ol ttie mean value ol
      reference metnod(s) lest dau in
      terns Of errvsSJOn standard or 10
      percent ol rhe applicable
      standard. wtKhever o greater.
    Must provide a cftech ol a* analyzer
      nlemal nwrors and lenses and afl
      electroric orcutry ncluckng Ine
      radiation source and detector
      assemtory wrwcf) are normally use
      in sampling and analysis.
    CTiart scales must be readable to
      •xrrm « 0 50 pet ol lull-scale.
    Must use jfie seme sample nterlaee
      to sample botn rne pollutant and
      dJuent gases. Place in series
      frMuent alter poHutant analyzer) or
      use a T.-* Oumg me
      o>ndi»on«v >nd operational test
      penods. the continuous mrXMlormg
      system sftal not requ*s any
                      repiecemenc or adjustment olrter
                      loan Wit clearly specified a*
                      routine and regured in Vie
                      operabon and maMilenanc*
                      manuals. ' Evessed as Ine sum
                      ol trie absolute mean value plus
                      the 95 percent conhdence interval
                      ol a senes ol tests dmded by a
                      relerenca value. • A low-level IS-
                      IS percent ol span value) *iti lest
                      may be substituted lor the zero
                      Onfl leiti.
      5.2.2   Mid-Level Gas. A gas
    concentration that is equivalent to 45 to
    55 percent of the span value.
        5.2.3   Zero Gas. A gas concentration
      of less than 0.25 percent of the span
      value. Ambient air may be used forth
      zero gas.
        5.3  Calibration Gas Cells or Filters,
      For continuous monitoring systems
      which use calibration gas cells or filler
      use three certified calibration gas cell]
      or filters as specified below:
        5.3.1   High-Level Gas Cell or Filter,
      One that produces an output equivalent
      to 80 to 90 percent of the span value
        5.3.2   Mid-Level Gas Cell or Filter.
      One that produces an output equivalent
      to 45 to 55 percent of the span value.
    "   5.3.3  Zero Gas Cell or Filter. One
      that produces an output equivalent lo
      zero. Alternatively, an analyzer may
      produce a zero value check by
      mechanical means, such as a movable
      mirror.
        5.4  Calibration Gas—Gas Cell or
     Filter Combination. Combinations of llii|
     above may be used.
       6.  Performance Specification Test
     Procedures.
       6.1  Pretest Preparation.
       6.1.1   Calibration Gas Certification,
     The  tester may select one of the
     following alternatives: (a) The tester
     may use calibration gases prepared
     according to the protocol defined in
     Citation 10.5. i.e. These gases may be
     used as received without reference
     method analysis (obtain a statement
     from the gas cylinder supplier certifying
     that  the calibration gases have been
     prepared according to the protocol); or
     (b) the tester may use calibration gase!
     not prepared according to the protocol
     In case (b). he must perform triplicate
     analyses of each calibration gas (mid-
     level and high-level, only) within 2
     weeks prior to the operational test
    period using the appropriate reference
     methods. Acceptable  procedures are
     described in Citations 10.6 and 10.7.
    Record the results on  a data sheet
     (example is shown  in Figure 2-3). Hack
    of the individual analytical results mail
    be  within 10 percent (or 15 ppm,
    whichever is greater)  of the average;
    otherwise, discard the entire set and
    repeat the triplicate analyses. If the
    average of the triplicate reference
    method test results is, within 5 percenl«|
    the calibration gas manufacturer's taj
    value, use the tag vafiie: otherwise,
    conduct at least 3 additional reference
    method lest analysesnintil the resullso!
    6 individual runs (the  3 original plusS
    additional) agree within 10 percent of"
    ppm.  whichever is greater, of the
    average. Then use this average for In*
    cylinder value.
                                                         11-116
    

    -------
                 Figure 2-3.   Analysis  of Calibration  Gases
    
     Date	(Must be within 2 weeks prior  to the
                        operational  test period)
    
     Reference  Method Used
    Sample Run
    1
    2
    3
    Average
    Maximum % Deviation
    Mid-levelb
    pom
    
    
    
    
    
    High-level0
    PP">
    
    
    
    
    
       Not  necessary  if the protocol  in  Citation  10.5  is used
       to prepare the gas  cylinders.
    
       Average must be 45  to 55  percent  of span value.
    
    c  Average must be 80  to 90  percent  of span value.
    
       Must be £  + 10  percent of applicable average  or  15 ppm,
       whichever  Ts greater.
      6.1.2  Calibration Gas Cell or Filter
    Certification. Obtain (a) a statement
    from the manufacturer certifying that the
    calibration gas cells or filters (zero, mid-
    level, and high-level) will produce the
    stated instrument responses for  the
    continuous monitoring system, and (b) a
    description of the lest procedure and
    equipment used to calibrate the cells or
    filters. At a minimum, the manufacturer
    must have calibrated the gas cells or
    filters against a simulated source of
    known concentration.
      6.2  Conditioning Period. Prepare the
    monitoring system for operation
    according to the manufacturer's written
    instructions. At the outset of the
    conditioning period, zero and span the
    system. Use  the mid-level calibration
    gas (or gas cell or filter) to set the span
    at 50 percent of recorder full-scale. If
    necessary to determine negative zero
    drift, offset the scale by 10 percent.  (Do
    not forget to  account for this when using
    the calibration curve.) If a zero offset is
    not possible  or is impractical, a low-
    level drift may be substituted for the
     zero drift, by using a low-level (5 to 15
     percent of span value) calibration gas
     (or gas cell or filter). This low-level
     calibration gas (or gas cell or filter) need
     not  be certified. Operate the continuous
     monitoring system for an initial 166-hour
     period in the manner specified by the
     manufacturer. Except  during times of
     instrument zero, calibration checks, and
     system backpurges, the continuous
     monitoring system shall collect and
     condition the effluent gas sample (if
     applicable), analyze the sample for the
     appropriate gas constituents, and
     produce a permanent record of the
     system output Conduct daily zero and
     mid-level calibration checks and, when
     drift exceeds the daily operating limits,
     make adjustments. The data recorder
     shall reflect these checks and
     adjustments. Keep a record of any
     instrument failure during this time. If the
     conditioning period is  interrupted
     because of source breakdown  (record
     the dates and times of process
     shutdown), continue the 168-hour period
     following resumption of source
     operation. If the conditioning period is
     interrupted because of monitor failure,
     restart the 168-hour conditioning  period
     when the monitor becomes functional.
      6.3  Operational Test Period. Operate
     the continuous monitoring system for an
     additional 168-hour period. The
     continuous monitoring system shall
     monitor the effluent, except during
     periods when the system calibration and
     response time are checked or during
     system backpurges; however, the system
    shall produce a permanent record of all
     operations. Record any system failure
     during this time on the data recorder
     output sheet.
      It is not necessary that the 168-hour
    operational test period immediately
    follow the 168-hour conditioning period.
    During the operational  test period,
    perform the following test procedures:
      6.3.1   Calibration Error
    Determination. Make a total of 15
    nonconsecutive zero, mid-level, and
    high-level measurements (e.g.. zero, mid-
    level, zero, high-level, mid-range,  etc.).
                                                    11-117
    

    -------
    This will result in a set of 5 each of zero.
    mid-level, and high-level measurements.
    Convert the data output to concentration
    units, if necessary, and record the
    results on a data sheet (example is
    shown in Figure"2-4). Calculate  the
    differences between the reference
    calibration gas concentrations and the
    measureTnent system reading. Then
    calculate the mean, confidence interval,
    and calibration errors separately for the
    mid-level and high-level concentrations
    using Equations 2-1. 2-2. and 2-3. In
    Equation 2-3. use each respective
    calibration gas concentration for R.V.
                                                 11-118
    

    -------
               Figure 2-4.  Calibration Error Determination
    Run
    no.
    
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    Calibration gas
    concentration3
    ppm
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Measurement system
    reading
    ppm
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 2-1) =
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 2-2) =
    Calibration Error (Eq. 2-3)D =
    Arithmetic
    differences
    ppm
    A-B
    Hid 1 High
    
    
    
    
    j
    " 1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    .T ;_
    
    
     a Calibration Data from Section 6.1.1  or 6.1.2
            Mid-level:  C *	ppm
            High-level: D = 	
     b Use C or 0 as R.V. in Eq.  2-3
                    ppm
    Date
     Figure 2-5.  Response Time
    	    High-level
                                                             _ppm
          Test Run
              3
           Average
               Upscale
                 m1n.
    Downscale
       m1n.
    System Response Time {slower of A and B)
                                         min.
                                      11-119
    

    -------
        6.3.2  Response Time Test Procedure.
      At a minimum, each response lime test
      shall provide a check of the entire
      sample transport line (if applicable), any
      sample conditioning equipment (if
      applicable), the pollutant analyzer, and
      the data recorder. For in-situ systems,
      perform the response time check by
      introducing the calibration gases at the
      sample interface (if applicable), or by
      introducing the calibration gas cells or
      filters at an appropriate location in the
      pollutant analyzer. For extractive
      monitors, introduce the calibration gas
      at the sample probe inlet in the stack or
      at the point of connection between the
      rigid sample probe and the sample
      transport line. If an extractive analyzer
      is used to monitor the effluent from more
      than one source, perform the response
      time test for each sample interface.
        To begin the response time test
      introduce zero gas (or zero cell or filter)
      into the continuous monitor. When the
      system output has stabilized, switch to
      monitor the stack effluent and wait until
      a  "stable value" has been reached.
      Record the upscale response time. Then,
      introduce the high-level calibration gas
      (or gas cell or filter). Once the system
      has stabilized at the high-level
      concentration, switch to monitor the
      stack effluent and wait until a "stable
      value" is reached. Record the downscale
      response time. A "stable value" is
      equivalent  to a change of less than 1
      percent of span value for 30 seconds or S
      percent of measured average
      concentration for 2 minutes. Repeat the
      entire procedure three times. Record the
      results of each test on a data sheet
      (example is shown in Figure 2-5).
      Determine the means of the upscale and
      downscale response times using
     Equation 2-1. Report the slower time as
     the system response time.
      6.3.3  Field Test for Zero Drift and
     Calibration Drift Perform the zero and
     calibration drift lesls for each pollutanl
     analyzer and data  recorder in the
     continuous monitoring system.
      6.3.3.1  Two-hour Drift. Introduce
     consecutively zero gas (or zero cell or
     filter) and high-level calibration gas (or
     gas cell or filter) at 2-hour intervals until
     15 sets (before and after) of data are
     obtained. Do not make any zero or
     calibration adjustments during  this time
     unless otherwise prescribed by the
     manufacturer. Determine and record the
     amount that the output had drifted from
     the  recorder zero and high-level value
     on a data sheet (example is  shown in
    Figure 2-6). The 2-hour periods over
    which the measurements are conducted
    need not be consecutive, but must not
    overlap. Calculate the zero and
    calibration drifts for each set Then
     calculate the mean, confidence interval,
     and zero and calibration drifts (2-hour)
     using Equations 2-1, 2-2. and 2-3. In
     Equation 2-3. use the span value for R.V.
       6.3.3.2  Twenty-Four Hour Drift. In
     addition to the 2-hour drift tests, perform
     a series of seven 24-hour drift tests as
     follows: At the beginning of each 24-
     hour period., calibrate the monitor, using
     mid-level value. Then introduce the
     high-level calibration gas (or gas cell or
     filter) to obtain the initial reference
     value. At the end of the 24-hour period,
     introduce consecutively zero gas (or gas
     cell or filter) and high-level calibration
     gas (or gas cell or filter); do not make
     any adjustments at this time. Determine
     and record the amount of drift from the
     recorder zero and high-level value on a
     data sheet (example is shown in Figure
     2-7). Calculate the zero and calibration
     drifts for each set. Then calculate the
     mean, confidence interval, and zero and
     calibration drifts (24-hour) using
    Equations 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3. In Equation
    2-3, use the span value for R.V.
                                                    11-120
    

    -------
    Date
    set
    no.
    1
    2 .
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    Date
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Time
    Begin
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Zero Rdg
    InU. F1n.
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 2-1)
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 2-2)
    Zero Drift3
    Zero
    drift
    C-B-A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hi-level
    Rdg
    n1t. Fin.
    D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Ca
    
    E
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Span
    drift
    F-E-D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hbratlon,
    dr1fta
    Callb.
    drift
    G-F-C
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Date
    set
    no.
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    Date
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    T1m
    Begin
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Zerc
    InU.
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Rdg
    f\n.
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 2-1)
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 2-2)
    Zero drift
    Zero
    drift
    C'B-A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hi-level
    Rdg
    In1t. Fin.
    D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    E
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Span
    drift
    F-E-D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Calibration .
    Hr>H>a
    Callb.
    drift
    G»F-C
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
                                                                          Use Equation  2-3. with  the span value for R. V.
                                                                                Figure 2-7.   Zero and  Calibration Drift  (24-hour)
    Use Equation 2-3, with span value for R. V.
             Figure 2-6.  Zero and Calibration Drift (2 hour)
    

    -------
        Note.—Automatic zero and calibration
      adjustment* made by the monitoring aystem
      without operator intervention or initiation are
      allowable at any time. Manual adjustments,
      however, are allowable only at 24-hour
      intervals, unless a shorter time it specified by
      the manufacturer.
        6.4  System Relative Accuracy.
      Unless otherwise specified  in an
      applicable subpart of the regulations.
      the reference methods for SO>, NOM.
      diluent (d or CO,), and moisture are
      Reference Methods 6, 7, 3, and 4.
      respectively.  Moisture may  be
      determined along with SOa using
      Method 6. See Citation 10.8. Reference
      Method 4 is necessary only  if moisture
      content is needed to enable comparison
      between the Reference Method and
      monitor values. Perform the accuracy
      test using the  following guidelines:
        6.4.1  Location of Pollutant Reference
      Method Sample Points. The  following
      specifies the location of the  Reference
      Method sample  points which are on the
      same cross-sectional plane as the
      monitor's. However, any cross-sectional
      plane within 2 equivalent diameter of
      straight runs may be used, by using the
      projected  image of the monitor on the
      selected plane in the following criteria.
       6.4.1.1   For point monitors, locate the
      Reference Method sample point no
      further than 30 cm (or 5 percent of the
      equivalent diameter of the cross section,
      whichever is less] from the pollutant
      monitor sample point.
       6.4.1.2   For  multipoint  monitors,
      locale each Reference Method sample
      traverse point  no further than 30 cm (or
     5 percent of the equivalent diameter of
     the cross section, whichever is less)
     from each  corresponding pollutant
     monitor sample point
      6.4.1.3  For  limited-path and path
     monitors, locate  3 sample points on a
     line parallel to the monitor path and no
     further than 30 cm (or 5 percent of the
     equivalent diameter of the cross section,
     whichever is less) from  the centerline of
     the monitor path. The three points of the
     Reference Method shall correspond to
     points in the monitor path at  16.7, 50.0,
     and 83.3 percent of the effective length
     of the monitor  path.
      6.4.2  Location of Diluent and
     Moisture Reference Method Sample
     Points.
      6.4.2.1  For sources which  require
     diluent monitors in addition to pollutant
     monitors, locate each of the sample
     points for the diluent Reference Method
     measurements  within 3 cm of the
     corresponding pollutant  Reference
    Method sample point as defined in
    Sections 6.4.1.1, 6.4.1.2. or 6.4.1.3. In
    addition, locate each pair of diluent and
    pollutant Reference Method sample
    points no further than 30 cm (or 5
      percent of the equivalent diameter of the
      cross section, whichever is less) from
      both the diluent and pollutant
      continuous monitor sample points or
      paths.
        6.4.2.2  If it is necessary to convert
      pollutant and/or diluent monitor
      concentrations to a dry basis for
      comparison with the Reference data.
      locate each moisture Reference Method
      sample point within 3 oh of the
      corresponding pollutant or diluent
      Reference Method sample point as
      defined  in Sections 6.4.1.1, 6.4.1.2, 6.4.1.3.
      or 6.4.2.1.
        6.4.3  Number of Reference Method
      Tests.
        6.4.3.1  For NO, monitors, make a
      minimum of 27 NO, Reference,Method
      measurements, divided into 9 sets.
        6.'4.3.2  For SO, monitors, make a
      minimum of 9 SOt Reference Method
      tests.
        6.4.3.3  For diluent monitors, perform
      one diluent Reference Method test for
      each SO. and/or NO, Reference Method
      test(s).
        6.4.3.4   For moisture determinations,
      perform one moisture Reference Method
      test for each or each set of pollutants)
      and diluent (if applicable) Reference
      Method tests.
       Note.—The tester may choose to perform
      more than 9 sets of NO, measurements or
     more than 9 SO, reference tr.ethod diluent, or
     moisture tests. If this option is chosen, the
     tester may, at his discretion, reject up to 3 of
     the set or test results, so long as the total
     number of set or test results used to
     determine the relative accuracy is greater
     than or equal to 9. Report all data including
     rejected data.
       6.4.4  Sampling Strategy for
     Reference Method Tests. Schedule the
     Reference Method tests so that they will
     not be in  progress when zero drift,
     calibration drift, and response time data
     are being taken. Within  any 1-hour
     period, conduct the following tests: (a)
     one set, consisting of 3 individual
     measurements, of NO, and/or one  SOj;
     (b) one diluent if applicable: and (c) one
     moisture (if needed). Whenever two or
     more reference tests (pollutant, diluent,
     and moisture) are cooducted, the tester
     may choose to run all these reference
     tests within a 1-hour period. However, it
     is recommended that the tests be run
     concurrently or'consecutively within a
     4-minute interval if two reference tests
     employ grab sampling techniques. Also
     whenever an integrated reference test is
     run together with grab sample reference
     tests, it is  recommended that the
     integrated sample be started  one-sixth
     the test period before the first grab
    sample  is  collected.
      In order to properly correlate the
    continuous monitoring system and
      Reference Method data, mark the
      beginning and end of each Reference
      Method test period (including theexacl
      time of day) on the pollutant and dilueni
      (if applicable) chart recordings. Use one
      of the following strategies for the
      Reference Method tests:
        6.4.4.1  Single Point Monitors. For
      single point sampling, the tester may: (jj
      take a 21-minute integrated sample (e.g,
      Method 6. Method 4, or the integrated
      bag sample  technique of Method 3)f|b)
      take 3 grab samples (e.g. Method 7 or
      the grab sample technique of Method 3],
      equally spaced at 7-minute (±2 min)
    ' intervals (or one-third the test period);
     or (c) take 3 grab samples over a 3-
      minute test period.
      -  6.4.4.2   Multipoint or Path Monitors.
     For multipoint sampling, the tester may
     either (a)  make a 21-minute integrated
     sample traverse, sampling for 7 minute!
     [±2 min) (or one-third the test period)al
     each point: or (b) take grab samples al
     each traverse point scheduling the grab
     samples to that they are an equal
     interval (7+2 minutes) of time apart (or
     one-third the test period).
       Note.—If  the number of sample points ii
     greater than 3, make appropriate adjuilmeolij
     to the individual sampling time interval]. Al
     times NSPS  performance test data may be
     used as part of the data base of the
     continuous monitoring relative accuracy
     tests. In these  cases, other test periods at
     specified in  the applicable subparts of the
     regulations may be used.
       6.4.5  Correlation of Reference
     Method and Continuous  Monitoring
     System  Data. Correlate the continuous
     monitoring system data with the
     Reference Method test data, as to the
     lime and duration of the  Reference
     Method tests. To accomplish this, first
     determine from the continuous
     monitoring system chart  recordings, the
     integrated average pollutant and diluenl
     (if applicable) concentration(s) for each
     Reference Method test period. Be sureti
    consider system response time. Then,
    compare each integrated average
    concentration against the corresponding
    average concentration obtained by the
    Reference Method: use the following
    guidelines to  make these comparisons:
      0.4.5.1  If the Reference Method is an
    integrated sampling technique (e.g,
    Method 6).  make a direct comparison ol
    the Reference Method results and the
    continuous  monitoring system integrate'
    average  concentration.
      6.4.5.2  If the Reference Method Is I
    grab-sampling technique  (e.g.. Method
    7). first average the results from allgw
    samples  taken during the test period,
    and then compare this average value
    against the  integrated value obtained
    from the continuous monitoring sysleffl
    chart recording.
                                                       11-122
    

    -------
       8.5  Data Summary for Relative
     Accuracy Tests. Summarize the results
     on a data sheet: example is shown in
     figure 2-8. Calculate the arithmetic
     differences between the reference
     method and the continuous monitoring
     output sets. Then calculate the mean,
     confidence interval, and system relative
     accuracy, using Equation 2-1. 2-2, and
     2-3. In Equation 2-3, use the average of
     the reference method test results for
     R.V.
    
     7. Equations
       7.1   Arithmetic Mean. Calculate the
     mean of a data set as follows:
                       Eqvutton 1-2
     Where:
       x = arithmetic mean.
       n = number of data points.
       XX| = algebraic turn of the individual
        values, x*.
       When the mean of the differences of
     pairs of data is calculated, be sure to
     correct the data for moisture.
       7.2  Confidence Interval. Calculate
     the 95 percent  confidence interval (two-
     sided] as follows:
    C.I.,,, • -^^ Jnt*   - U*.)    Equation 1-3
    Where:
      C.I.,. = 95 percent confidence interval
        estimate of mean value.
      t..n = t«i-./.)       (see Table 2-2)
    BILLING COO£ IMO-01-M
    
              Table 2-2.—I- Vtkxa
    If
    2
    3
    4
    S
    *
    •Th* «
    gr««» of
    '.975
    12 70S
    43O3
    3.182
    2.776
    2.571
    ,k*~, n V.,
    freedom. U
    n-
    7
    S
    *
    10
    11
    IUU*.
    li« ff «O
    '.975
    2447
    2.365
    2306
    2.262
    2.229
    . tk.Mjy
    jal to M
    n-
    12
    13
    14
    15
    1<
    corrected IQI
    numtMr of r
    '.975
    2.201
    2.179
    2.16O
    2.145
    2.131
    n-1 4+
    xfco)ua<
                                                    11-123
    

    -------
    Run
    no.
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    Date and
    time
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Average
    	 rSV.
    . RK
    M .IrHff
    a ~ "
    ppm
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Confidence Interval
    Accuracy0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    N0xb
    RM
    M .Imff
    a
    ppm
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C02 or 02a
    RM, [ M.
    *d *d-
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    so2a
    RM 1
    M fam
    mass/G
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    :v
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    NO,"
    RM
    M
    niff
    mass/GCV
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Make sure that RM and M data are on a consistent  basis,  either wet or dry
             ""'"'''  '*             Figure  2-8.   Relative accuracy determination
    

    -------
      7.3  Relative Accuracy. Calculate the relative accuracy of a set of data as
      follows:
                             fi.A. •
                                                x  100  Equation 2-3
        Where:   R. A.
                R.V.
    « relative accuracy
    
    • absolute value of the arithmetic  mean
    
      (from Equation 2-1).
    
    • absolute value of the 95 percent  confi-
    
      dence Interval (from Equation 2-2).
    
    * reference value,  as defined 1n Sections
    
      6.3.1, 6.3.3.1, 6.3.3.2, and 6.5.
     8. Reporting
        At a minimum [check with regional
     offices for additional requirements, if
     any) summarize the following results in
     tabular form: calibration error for mid-
     level and high-level concentrations, the
     slower of the upscale and downscale
     response times, the 2-hour and 24-hour
     zero and calibration drifts, and the
     system relative accuracy. In addition,
     provide, for the conditioning and
     operational test periods, a statement to
     the effect that the continuous monitoring
     system operated continuously for a
     minimum of 168 hours each, except
     during times of instrument zero,
     calibration checks, system backpurges.
     and source breakdown, and that no
     corrective maintenance, repair,
     replacement, or adjustment other than
     that clearly specified as routine and
     required in the operation and
     maintenance manuals were made. Also
     include the manufacturer's certification
     statement (if applicable) for the
     calibration gas, gas cells, or filters.
     Include all data sheets and calculations
     and charts (data outputs), which  are
     necessary to substantiate that  the
     system met the performance
     specifications.
    
     9.  Retest
       If the continuous monitoring  system
     operates within the specified
     performance parameters of Table 2-1,
     the operational test period will be
     successfully concluded. If the
     continuous monitoring system fails to
     meet any of the specifications,  repeat
     that portion cf the testing which is
     related to the failed specification.
     10. Bibliography
      10.1  "Monitoring Instrumentation for
    the Measurement of Sulfur Dioxide in
                       Stationary Source Emissions,"
                       Environmental Protection Agency,
                       Research Triangle Park, N.C.. February
                       1973.
                         10.2   "Instrumentation for the
                       Determination of Nitrogen Oxides
                       Content of Stationary Source
                       Emissions," Environmental Protection
                       Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C..
                       Volume 1, APTD-0847, October 1971;
                       Volume 2, APTD-0942. January 1972.
                         10.3   "Experimental Statistics,"
                       Department of Commerce, Handbook 91,
                       1963, pp. 3-31. paragraphs 3-3.1.4.
                         10.4   "Performance Specifications for
                       Stationary-Source Monitoring Systems
                       for Cases and Visible Emissions,"
                       Environmental Protection Agency,
                       Research Triangle Park. N.C., EPA-650/
                       2-74-013, January 1974.
                         10.5  Traceability Protocol for
                       Establishing True Concentrations of
                       Cases Used for Calibration and Audits
                       of Continuous Source Emission Monitors
                       (Protocol No. 1). June 15,1978.
                       Environmental Monitoring and Support
                       Laboratory. Office of Research and
                       Development. U.S. EPA, Research
                       Triangle Park. N.C. 27711.
                         10.6  Westlin. P. R. and J. W. Brown.
                       Methods for Collecting and Analyzing
                       Gas Cylinder Samples. Emission
                       Measurement Branch, Emission
                       Standards and Engineering Division,
                       Office of Air Quality Planning and
                       Standards. U.S. EPA. Research Triangle
                       Park. N.C., July 1978.
                         10.7  Curtis, Foston. A Method for
                       Analyzing NOX Cylinder Cases—
                       Specific Ion Electrode Procedure.
                       Emission Measurement Branch,
                       Emission Standards and Engineering
                       Division. Office of Air Quality and
                       Standards. U.S. EPA. Research Triangle
                      Park, N.C, October 1978.
                        10.8  Stanley, Jon and P. R. Westlin.
     An Alternative Method for Stack Gas
     Moisture Determination. Emission
     Measurement Branch. Emission
     Standards and Engineering Division,
     Office of Air Quality Planning and
     Standards. U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
     Park. N.C.. August 1978.
    
     Performance Specification 3—
     Specifications and Test Procedures for
     CO, and Oi Continuous Monitors in
     Stationary Sources
    
     1. Applicability and Principle
       1.1  Applicability. This Specification
    • contains (a) installation requirements,
     (b) instrument performance and
     equipment specifications, and (c) test
     procedures and data reduction
     procedures for evaluating the
     acceptability  of continuous COi and O»
     monitors that are used as diluent
     monitors. The test procedures are
     primarily designed for systems that
     introduce calibration gases directly into
     the analyzer  other types of monitors
     (e.g.. single-pass monitors, as described
     in Section  2.2.7 of Performance
     Specification  2 of this Appendix) will be
     evaluated  on  a case-by-case basis upon
     written request to the Administrator,
     and alternative procedures will be
     issued separately.
      1.2  Principle. Any CO, or O,
     continuous monitor, which is expected
     to meet this Specification, is operated
     for a  specified length of time. During this
     specified time period, the continuous
     monitor is  evaluated to determine
    conformance with the Specification.
    
    2. Definitions
      The definitions are the same as those
    listed in Section 2 of Performance
    Specification 2.
    3. Installation  Specifications
      3.1   Measurement Location and
    Measurement  Points or Paths. Select and
    install the continuous monitor at the
    same sampling location used for the
    pollutant monitor(s). Locate the
    measurement  points or paths as shown
    in Figure 3-1 or 3-2.
      3.2   Alternative Measurement
    Location and Measurement Points or
    Paths. The  diluent monitor may be
                                                     11-125
    

    -------
     installed at a different location from that
     of the pollutant monitor, provided that
     the diluent gas concentrations at both
     locations differ by no more than 5
     percent from that of the pollutant
     monitor location for CO, or the quantity,
     20.9-percent Oj. for O,. See Section 3.4
     of Performance Specification 2 for the
     demonstration procedure.
    
     4. Continuous Monitor Performance and
     Equipment Specifications
       The continuous monitor performance
     and equipment specifications are listed
     in Table 3-1. To be considered
     acceptable, the continuous monitor must
     demonstrate compliance with these
     specifications, using the test procedures
     in Section 8.
    
     5. Apparatus
       5.1  COj or Oi Continuous Monitor.
     Use any continuous monitor, which is
     expected to meet this Specification. The
     data recorder may either be an analog
     strip-chart recorder or other suitable
     device having an input voltage range
     compatible with the analyzer output.
      5.2  Calibration Gases. Diluent gases
     shall be air or N5 for COj mixtures, and
     shall be Ni for O3 mixtures. Use three
    calibration gases as specified below:
                                                   11-126
    

    -------
        GEOMETRICALLY
            SIMILAR
             AREA
         (   1%OF STACK
        CROSS-SECTION)
                                             (a)
    GEOMETRICALLY
        SIMILAR
         AREA
     I <1%OF STACK
    CROSS-SECTION)
                                               (b)
          3-1.  Relative locations of pollutant (P) and diluent (D) measurement points in (a) circular
               and (b) rectangular ducts. P is located at the centroid of the geometrically similar
               area. Note:  The geometrically similar area need not be concentric.
                                     11-127
    

    -------
     GEOMETRICALLY
         SIMILAR
          AREAS
      ( <1% OF STACK
     CROSS-SECTION)
        GEOMETRICALLY
            SIMILAR
            AREAS
        {  <1%OF STACK
        CROSS-SECTION)
                                                PARALLEL
                                             MEASUREMENT
                                                  LINES
                                               (a)
                                                    PARALLEL
                                                  MEASUREMENT
                                                       LINES
                                                  (b)
    Figure 3-2.  Relative locations of pollutant (P) and diluent (D) measurement paths for (a) circular
               and (b) rectangular ducts.  P is located at the centroid of both the geometrically simi-
               lar areas and the pollutant monitor path cross-sectional areas.  D is located at the cen-
               troid of the diluent monitor path cross-sectional area.
                                             11-128
    

    -------
           Table *-\.—Performance tndEquipment
                     Speohctlions
          Pwamalar              SeaoAcatton
    
       1. Condrboning     > 168 hours.
    
       2. Oparabona) MI   » 160 hour*.
       I. Cafcorabon •rrcx"'- c 5 pet ol aach (md-ranoa and
                        rawing*. o"M cakbribon gat
                        •slue,
       4. Rapoma ton* _ « 15 mn/fcn.
       6. Zoo arm (2-     « 0.4 pel CO. or CV
       ho.*)*-'.
       • Zoo drrfl P4-    < 103 pet CO. or (X.
       hour)"-'.
       T. CafcDrsbon drtl p-  < 0 4 pet CO, or O»
       ha*)*.
       a. Ciwnoon (Ml    « 0 J pcL CO. or O»
       (24-hour) ».
       •. Data racoroar chart Ou>1 ioaJ*l mat b* madatil* to
       r»»o*jOon.          » momor ihdl not require any corrvcbv* ma*il»-
     nanc*. rapair. rap4acam«nc or  adjustment othar  ff\an 9ul
     ctaatly apaciftad •« reutna and ra^uvad in **• oparafaon and
     rn*n4ananca manuatm.
       > Eiprauad a> Via turn ol »ia ib«ok«a maan valua pkja
     Vw 95 pa«ca«< conAoanca tnlarval of a *anai of lasts.
       • A kMMaval (i-li parcant of span *•*—) onfl t«U may oa
     aubsMMad tor t»a zaro dnfl lasts.
       5.2.1  High-Uvel Gas. A CO, or O,
     concentration of 20.0 to 22.5 percent. For
     O> analyzers, ambient air (20.9 percent
     Oi) may be used as the 'high-range
     calibration gas; lower  high-level O>
     concentration may be  used,  subject to
     the approval of the Administrator.
       5.2.2 Mid-Level Gas. A CO, or O,
     concentration of 11.0 to 14.0 percent;  for
     O, analyzers, concentrations in  the
     operational range may be used.
       5.2.3 Zero Gas. A CO, or O,
     concentration of less than 0.05 percent
     For CO, monitors, ambient air (0.03
     percent CO,) may be used as the zero
     gas.
       8. Performance Specification Test
     Procedures.
       6.1  Calibration Gas Certification.
     Follow the procedure as outlined in
     Section 8.1.2 of Performance
     Specification 2. except  use 0.5 percent
     CO» or O, instead of the 15 ppm. Figure
     3-3 is provided as an example daVa
     sheet.
       6.2   Conditioning Period. Follow  the
     same procedure outlined in Section  6.2
     of Performance Specification 2.
      6.3 .  Operational Test Period. Follow
     the same procedures outlined in  Section
    6.3 of Performance Specification  2. to
    evaluate the calibration error, response
    time, and the 2-hour and 24-hour zero
    end calibration drifts. See example data
    sheets (Figures 3-4 through 3-7).
                                                          11-129
    

    -------
     Date
               Figure 3-3.  Analysis of Calibration'Gases'
    __(Must be within 2 weeks prior to the opera-
       tional  test period)
     Reference Method Used
          Sample run
            Average
          Maximum %
    
          deviation
           Mid-rangec
              ppm
    High-range
        ppm
      Not necessary if  the  protocol  in  Citation  10.5 of Perfor-
      mance Specification 2  is used  to  prepare the  gas  cylinders.
    
    
    c Average must be 11.0  to 14.0 percent;  for  07,  see Section
      5.2.2.                                      £
    
    
      Average must be 20.0  to 22.5 percent;  for  00,  see Section
      5.2.1.                                      2
    
    
    e Must be £ +  10 percent of applicable average or 0.5  percent,
      whichever Ts greater.
                           11-130
    

    -------
                  Figure 3-4.   Calibration  Error  Determination
    Run
    No.
    
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    \5
    Calibration Gas
    Concentration3
    ppm
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Measurement System
    Reading
    ppm
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 2-1 )b =
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 2-2) =
    Calibration Error (Eq. 2-3)b>C =
    Arithmetic
    Differences
    ppm
    A-B
    Mid
    -
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hiqh
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    -^
    'Calibration  Data  from Section  6.1
       Mid-level:   C =	ppm
       High-level:  D = 	ppm
    5  See  Performance  Specification. 2
    '  Use  C or D  as R. V.
                                     11-131
    

    -------
                           Figure 3-5.   Response Time
    Date
    High-Range =
    ppm
    Test Run
    1
    2
    3
    Average
    Upscale
    min
    
    
    
    A =
    Ddwnscale
    min
    
    
    
    B =
    System Response Time  (slower of A and B) =
                 mm.
                                  11-132
    

    -------
    Dat
    set
    no
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    —
    
    
    
    • -" —
    
    Date
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Time
    Begi
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Zero Rd.
    Init.
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fin.
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 2-l)a
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 2-2)a
    Zero drift5
    Zero
    drift
    
    C=B-A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hi-Range
    Rdg.
    Init.
    D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fin.
    £
    
    -
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Span
    rlrif t
    
    F=E-D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Calibration drift
    Calib.
    drift
    G=F-C
    
    
    
    
    
    
    .
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    From Performance  Specification 2.
    Use Equation  2-3  of  Performance Specification  2 and 1.0 for R. V
    
                   Figure 3-6.  Zero and Calibration  Drift  (2  hour)
                              11-133
    

    -------
    Data
    set
    no.
    i
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Date
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Time
    Begin
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Zero Rdg
    Init.
    A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Arithmetic Mean (Eq. 2-l)a
    Fin.
    B
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Confidence Interval (Eq. 2-2)a
    Zero drift
    Zero
    drift
    
    C=B-A
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hi -Range
    Rdg
    Init.
    0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fin.
    E
    
    
    -
    
    
    
    
    Calibration
    Span
    drift
    F=E-D
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    drift b
    Calib.
    drift
    G=F-C
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    From Performance Specification 2.
    Use Equation  2-3  of Performance  Specification 2,  with 1.0 for R. V.
               Figure 3-7.  Zero  and  Calibration  Drift  (24-hour)
                             11-134
    

    -------
       8.4   System Relative Accuracy. (Note:
     The relative accuracy is not determined
     separately for the diluent monitor, bat is
     determined for the pollutant-diluent
     system.) Unless otherwise specified in
     an applicable subpart of the regulations.
     the Reference Methods for the diluent
     concentration determination shall be
     Reference Method 3 for CO, or O,. For
     this test, Fyrite analyses may be used
     for COi and O* determinations. Perform
     the measurements using the guidelines
     below {an example data sheet is shown
     in Figure 2-8 of Performance
     Specification 2):
       6.4.1   Location of Reference Method 3
     Sampling Points. Locate the diluent
     Reference Method sampling points
     according  to the guidelines given in
     Section 6.4.2.1 of Performance
     Specification 2.
      6.4.2  Number of Reference Method
     Tests. Perform one Reference Method 3
     test according to the guideline in
     Performance Specification 2.
      8.4.3  Sampling Strategy for
     Reference  Method Tests. Use the basic
     Reference  Method sampling strategy
     outlined in Section 6.4.4 (and related
     sub-sections) of Performance
     Specification 2.
      6.4.4  Correlation of Reference
     Method and Continuous Monitor Data.
     Use the guidelines given in Section 6.4.5
     of Performance Specification 2.
      7. Equations, Reporting. Retest, and
    Bibliography. The procedure and
    citations are the same as in Sections 7
    through 10  of Performance Specification
    2.
    |FR Doc. 79-01033 Fitaj ]0-»-7» £45 an)
                                                     11-135
    

    -------
       ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
       AGENCY
       40 CFR Part 60
    
       IAD-FRL 162&-7]
    
       Standards of Performance for New
       Stationary Sources; Proposed
       Revisions to General Provisions and
       Additions to Appendix A, and
       Reproposal of Revisions to Appendix
       B
       AGENCY: Environmental Protection
       Agency (EPA).
       ACTION: Proposed Rule and  Notice of
       Public Hearing.	_^____
       SUMMARY: This proposed rule (1) revises
       the monitoring requirements (§ 60.13) of
       the General Provisions, [2] adds
       Methods 6A and 6B to Appendix A, and
       (3) reproposes revisions to Performance
       Specifications 2 and 3 to Appendix B of
       40 CFR Part 60. The proposed revisions
       to § 60.13 are being made to make this
       section consistent with  the proposed
       revisions to Appendix B. Methods 6A
       and 6B are being proposed because they
      simplify the determination of the SO»
      emission rates in terms of ng/J.
      Performance Specifications 2 and 3
      revisions are being reproposed because
      the changes  that have been made to the
      performance specifications as a result of
      comments received on the original
      proposal of October  10.1979  (44 FR
      58602) are substantial and involve an
      entirely new concept
      DATES: Comments. Comments must be
      received  on or before March  27.1981.
       Public Hearing. A public hearing will
      be held on February 19,1981  beginning
      at 9 a.m.
       Request to Speak at Hearings.
      Persons wishing to present oral
      testimony must contact EPA by
     February  12,1981 (1 week before
     hearing).
     ADDRESSES: Comments. Comments
     should be submitted (in duplicate  if
     possible) to: Central Docket Section (A-
     130). Attention: Docket Number
     OAQPS-79-1, U.S.  Environmental
     Proleclion Agency, 401 M Street. SW.,
     Washington. D.C. 20460.
       Public Hearing. The public hearing
     will be held at Emission Measurement
     Labatory.  R.T.P. North Carolina. Persons
     wishing to present oral testimony should
     notify Ms. Vivian Phares. Emission
     Measurement Branch (MD-13). U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency,
     Research Triangle Park. North Carolina
    27711. telephone number (919) 541-5423.
      Docket. Docket Number OAQPS-79-4
    (Performance Specifications 2  and  3)
    and Docket Number A-80-30 (Methods
    6A and 6B), containing supporting
       information used in developing the
       proposed rulemaking are located in the
       U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency,
       Centra] Docket Section. West Tower
       Lobby, Gallery 1. Waterside Mall, 401 M
       Street. S.W.. Washington, D.C. 20460.
       The docket may be inspected between 8
       a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, and a
       reasonable fee may be charged for
       copying.
       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
       Mr. Roger T. Shigehara (MD-19). U.S.
       Environmental Protection Agency,
       Research Triangle Park. North Carolina
       27711.  telephone number  (919) 541-2237.
       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
       discussion in this section has been
       divided into three separate parts. Part A
       discusses proposed changes to the
       General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 60,
       Part B discusses the addition of
      proposed Methods 6A and 6B to
      Appendix A. and Part C discusses
      reproposal of revisions to Performance
      Specifications 2 and 3 to Appendix B.
    
      Part A
    
        The proposed revisions to §  60.13 of
      the General Provisions are being made
      to make this section consistent with the
      proposed revisions to Appendix B. Since
      the reproposal to Appendix B uses the
      concept of evaluating the continuous
      emission monitors as a system, based on
      relative accuracy test results, the use of
      certified cylinder gases, optical filters, or
      gas cells is not necessary.  The
      requirement for quantification of the
      zero and span drifts is not a change, but
      a clarification of what is required under
      the existing performance specifications.
    
     PartB
    
       Two reference methods (Methods 6A
     and 68)  are proposed. Method 6A.
     "Determination of Sulfur Dioxide,
     Moisture, and Carbon Dioxide
     Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion
     Sources." combines the sampling and
     analysis of SOi and CO,. The SO, is
     collected in a hydrogen peroxide
     solution  and analyzed by the barium-
     thorin tilration procedure described in
     Method 6. The CO, is collected by a
     solid absorbent and analyzed
     gravimetrically. The sample gas volume
     is measured to allow determination of
     SO, concentration. CO, concentration.
     moisture, and emission rate from
     combustion sources in ng/J. If the only
     measurement needed is in terms of
     emission rale or if the CO, and moisture
     concentrations are not needed, e.g.. to
     convert NOM concentration to ng/J, the
    volume meter is not required. It is
    intended  that Method 6A be.used as an
    alternative to Methods 8 and 3 for the
       purpose of determining SO, emission
       rates in ng/J.
         Method 6B. "Determination of Sulfur
       Dioxide and Carbon Dioxide Daily
       Average Emissions from Fossil Fuel
       Combustion Sources," employs the same
       sampling train and analysis procedure]
       as Method 6A. but the operation of the
       train is controlled on an intermittent
       basis by a timer or on a continuous
       basis by using a low, constant flow-rale
       pump. This allows an extended
       sampling time period and the
       determination of an average value for  .
       that time period of SO, concentration,
       CO, concentration, and emission rate
       from combustion sources in ng/J.
       Method 6B is proposed as an acceptable
       procedure for compliance with § 60.47a
       (0 of 40 CFR Part 60.  Subpart Da. Thij
       paragraph (f) requires that in the event
       of CEMS breakdown, emission data will
       be obtained by using other monitoring
       systems or reference  methods approved
      by the Administrator.
      PartC
        Revisions to Performance
      Specifications 2 and 3 for the initial
      evaluation of continuous emission
      monitoring systems (CEMS) for SO,,
      NO,, and diluent gases were proposed
      on October 10. 1979 (44 FR 58602).
      Comments received as a result of this
      proposal led to revaluation of the
      provisions and a change in the overall
      approach to the performance
      specifications. The reproposed
      performance specifications deemphasize
      instrument equipment specifications and
      add emphasis to the evaluation of the
      CEMS and its  location as a system. The
     specification requirements are limited to
     calibration drift tests and relative
     accuracy tests. The acceptability limits
     for relative.accuracy remain the same as
     in the previously proposed revisions to
     the performance specifications.
       CEMS guidelines will also be
     published in a  separate document at the
     time of proposal to provide vendors,
     purchasers, and operators of CEMS with
     supplementary equipment and
     performance specifications. The  •
     guidelines will contain additional
     procedures and specifications that may
     provide further evaluatiojn of the CEMS
     beyond that required by-Performance
     Specifications 2 and 3, e-g., response
     time. 2-hour zero and calibration drifts,
     sampling locations, and calibration
     value analyses.
    Applicability
      The proposed revisions would apply
    to all CEMS currently subject to
    Performance Specifications 2 and 3.
    These include sources subject to
    standards of performance that have
                                                        11-136
    

    -------
       already been promulgated and sources
       subject to Appendix P to 40 CFR Part 51.
       Since the requirements of the
       reproposed performance specification
       revisions are limited to daily calibration
       drift tests and relative accuracy tests,
       existing CEMS that met  the
       specifications of the current
       Performance Specifications 2 and 3 also
       meet the requirements of these revised
       specifications and, therefore, do not
       require retesting.
         This reproposal has retained the
       definition of a "continuous emission
       monitoring system" and  includes the
       diluent monitor, if applicable. This
       definition requires the relative accuracy
       of the CEMS to be determined in terms
       of the emission standard, e.g, mass per
       unit calorific value for fossil fuel-fired
       steam generators. Several commenters
       felt that the limits of relative accuracy
       should be relaxed from the present 20
       percent because of the addition of the
       diluent analyzer output Others added
       that errors with the manual reference
       methods could increase the possibility
       of poor relative accuracy  determinations
       now that an additional measurement is
       required. The Administrator has
       reviewed a number of relative accuracy
       tests and has concluded that the
      variations in the manual reference
      method determinations are not the
      major cause of failure, but that the
      difference between the mean of the
      reference method and the  CEMS values
      is the most probable cause. This
      situation is correctable.
      Comments on Proposal
       Numerous commenters noted that the
      proposed revisions go far beyond
      clarification and considered  them as
      significant changes. A large part of this
      concern was because they felt that
      many existing CEMS were not Installed
      according to the proposed  installation
      specifications. In addition, many
      commenters felt th« need for greater
      flexibility in selecting alternative CEMS
      measurement locations. Several
      commen'crs desired ths inclusion of test
     procedures to evaluate single-pass, in
     situ CEMS. Otherg objected to the length
     and cost of testing. Opposing views
     were presented on the need for
     stratification checks. Many commenters
     dealt with specific parts of the proposal
     and a few raised issues beyond the
     scope of the revisions. Because the
     Administrator has changed the overall
     approach to performance specifications
     as mentioned in the beginning of Part C,
     many of these comments no longer
     apply and many of the objections have
    been resolved.
      The quality assurance requirement*
    for CEMS and associated Issues were
       raised by many corrunenters. Most
       commenters stated that there was a
       need for EPA to issue guidelines or
       requirements for quality assurance. EPA
       is developing such procedures, and they
       will be published later this year or early
       next year as Appendix E to 40 CFR Part
       60. Some commenters erroneously
       assumed that the quality assurance
       procedures were an integral part of the
       specifications. Although related, this
       specification should be evaluated on the
       basis of its adequacy in evaluating a
       CEMS after their initial installation.
        The reproposed performance
       specifications include a  provision that
       the relative accuracy of a CEMS must be
       within ±20 percent of the mean
       reference value or ±10 percent of the
       applicable standard, whichever is
       greater. Several commenters endorsed
       this change, while one felt the change to
       allow an accuracy of ±10 percent of the
       applicable standard is too lenient at low
      emission rates. The Administrator feels
      that it is restrictive to require a high
      degree of relative accuracy when the
      actual emission levels are equivalent  to
      50 percent or less of the applicable
      emission standard.
      Request for Comments on Other Views
        A number of suggestions were
      received which were not incorporated in
      these revisions. Because they represent
      differing views, EPA requests comments
      on them to determine what course of
      action should be taken in the final rule
      making. The suggestions are as follows:
       1. Section 60.13(b) was  revised to
      exclude the mandatory 7-day
      conditioning period used to verify the
      CEMS operational status. Once
      commenter feels that the mandatory
      conditioning period should not only be
     retained, but should be made longer
     depending on how the CEMS is usad
     (i.e., for operation and maintenance
     requirements or for compliance/
     enforcement purposes) as follows:
       a. The presently required 7-day
     conditioning period should be retained
     for CEMS used for operation and
     maintenance requirements.
       b. If the CEMS is used for compliance/
     enforcement purposes, a 30-day
     conditioning period should be required
     and that the relative accuracy tei'.s
     should be spread over 3 days  instead of
     one.
       c. Ail CEMS, whether for operation
     and mainlenace requirements or for
     compliance/enforcement purposes,
     should be Installed and operational for
     60 or 90 days prior to the initial NSPS
     test
      If the above are done, the commenter
    feels that (1) the owner/operator/agency
    would be aware of the progress made by
       the control system in complying with the
       emission standards, (2) there would be a
       greater chance of the CEMS passing the
       performance specification test and of
       the facility complying with the
       regulations within the time requirements
       of § 60.8. and (3) the operator/vendor/
       tester/agency would minimize loss of
       valuable resources and time.
         2. Once commenter feels that
       5  60.12f.c) should require all CEMS
       Performance Specification Tests to be
       done concurrent with NSPS tests under
       5  60.8. This would streamline the
       process and save resources for owners
       and agencies alike.
         3. Section 60.13(d) was revised to
       delete the requirements  listed under
       (d)(l) and (d)(2) because EPA felt that
       the relative accuracy test would validate
       the GEMS system which includes the
       calibration gases or devices. One
       comrnenter, however, feels that the
      requirement to introduce zero and span
      gas mixtures into the measurement
      system  at the probe at the stack wall
      should be retained and conducted in
      such a way that the entire system
      including the sample interface is
      checked. This requirement would
      provide a means to check the CEMS on
      a daily basis. In addition, the commenter
      feels that the requirement for checking
      the calibration gases at 6-month
      intervals may be deleted provided that
      the values used for replacement gas
      cylinders, calibration gas cells or optical
      filters are approved by the control
      agency.
       4. One coramenter feels that the
      following specifications should be
      added in Section 4 of Performance
      Specification 2:
       a. The CEMS relative accuracy should
     be relaxed by using a sliding function of
      the allowable emission standard and/or
     the reference method tests for very low
     emission limits, e.g., 0.10 pounds per 10*
     Btu emission limit under PSD permits,
       b. Each new compliance/enforcement
     CEMS installed after 1983 must have an
     external means of checking the
     calibration of the instrument using
     separate  calibration/audit materials.
       c. A oinimum data recovery
     specification of at least 18 hours in at
     least 22 out of 30 days (or similar)
     should be included. This would mean
     that a performance specilication test
     would not be officially completed until
     after the 30 days.
       5. One commenler feels that EPA
     should consider using Section 7.1 of
     Performance Specification 2 to specify
     that during the GEMS performance
     specification test all data be recorded
     both in separate units of measurements
    (ppm end percent CO, or O3) as well a*
    combined units of the standard.
                                                          11-137
    

    -------
         6. In Performance Specification 2, the
       definition of "Relative Accuracy" is
       incorrect Instead of a degree of
       correctness, it is actually a measure of
       "relative error." One commenter feels
       thai "relative accuracy" should be
       changed to "relative error."
         7. In Section 7.3 of Performance
       Specification 2, the tester Is allowed to
       reject up to three samples provided that
       the  total number of test results used to
       determine the relative accuracy is
       greater than or equal to nine. EPA had
       considered using statistical techniques
       to reject outliers, but found that these
       techniques were too restrictive. One
       commenter feels that statistical
       techniques should be used. At a
       minimum, the commenter feels that the
       control agencies should be consulted
       before any data is rejected.
    
       Miscellaneous
       .. Authority: This proposed rule making is)
       blued under the authority of lections 111.
       114. and 301(a] of the Clean Air Act as
       • mended (42 U.S.C 7411. 7414. and 7601(a)).
        Dated: January 13.1981.
       Douglas M. Cos tie,
      Administrator,
        It is proposed  that §5 60.13, 60.46. and
      60.47a. Appendix A, and Appendix B of
      40 CFR Part 60 be amended as follows:
        1. By revising f 60.13(b). 60.13(c)(2](ii).
      and 60.13(d). by removing
      subparagraphs (1), (2). and (3) of
      § 60.13(b). and by removing
      subparagraphs (1), (2), and (3) of
      § 60.13(d) as follows:
    
      § 60.13  Monitoring requirements.
      •    *     •    •    •
       (b) All continuous monitoring systems
     and monitoring devices shall be
     installed and operational prior to
     conducting performance tests under
     § 6O.8. Verification of operational status
     shall, as a minimum, include completion
     of the manufacturer's written
     requirements or recommendations for
     installation, operation, and calibration
     of the device.
       (e) * * '
       (2) • • •
       (ii) Continuous monitoring systems for
     measurement of nitrogen oxides or
     sulfur dioxide shall be capable of
     measuring emission levels within rt20
     percent with a confidence level of 95
     percent  The performance tests and
     calculation procedures set forth in
     Performance Specification 2 of
     Appendix B shall be used for
     demonstrating compliance with this
     specification.
     •    •    •    •    •
       (d) Owners and operators of all
    continuous emission monitoring systems
    installed in accordance with the
       provisions of this part shall check the
       zero and span drift at least once daily in
       accordance with the method prescribed
       by the manufacturer of such systems
       unless the manufacturer recommends
       adjustments at shorter intervals In
       which case such recommendations shall
       be followed. The zero and span shall, as
       a minimum, be adjusted whenever the
       24-hour zero drift of 24-hour span  drift
       limits of the applicable performance
       specifications in Appendix B are
       exceeded. The amount of excess zero
       and span drift measured at the 24-hour
       interval checks shall be quantified and
       recorded. For continuous monitoring
       systems measuring opacity of emissions.
       the optical surfaces exposed to the
       effluent gases shall be cleaned prior to
       performing the zero and span drift
       adjustments except  that for systems
       using automatic zero adjustments,  the
       optical surfaces shall be cleaned when
       the cumulative automatic zero
       compensation exceeds 4 percent
       opacity. Unless otherwise approved by
       the Administrator, the following
      procedures shall be followed for
      continuous monitoring systems
      measuring opacity of emissions.
      Minimum procedures shall include  a
      method for producing a simulated zero
      opacity condition and an upscale(span)
      opacity condition using a certified
     • neutral density filter or other related
      technique to produce a known
      obscuration of the light beam. Such
      procedures shall provide a system check
      of the analyzer internal optical surfaces
      and all electronic circuitry including the
     lamp and photodetector assembly.
      •    •    •    •    •
       2. By revising § 60.46(a)(4) as follows:
     § 60.46  Test method* and procedures.
       W-
       (4) Method 6 for concentration of SO>.
     Method 6A may be used whenever
     Methods 8 and 3 data are used to
     determine the SO, emission rate In ng/J,
     and
     «    •     •     «     •
       3. By revising § 60.47a(h}(l] as follows:
     § 60.47m  Emission monitoring.
     •     •     •     •     «
       no • • •
       (1) Reference Methods 3. 6. and 7 as
     applicable, are used. Method 6B may be
     used whenever Methods 6 and 3 data
     are used to determine  the SO, emission
     rate in ng/J. The sampling location(s)
     are the same as  those used for the
     continuous monitoring system.
     •    •    •    «    •
      4. By adding to Appendix A of 40 CFR
    Part  60 two new methods. Methods 6A
    and Method 68, to read as follows:
       Appendix A—Reference Teit Melhodi
       •    •    •    •    •
    
       Method 6/4.—Determination of Sulfur
       Dioxide. Moisture, and Carbon Dioxide
       Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion
       Sourcft
       1. Applicability and Principle
        1.1  Applicability. Thji method applies to
       the determination of sulfur dioxide (SO,)
       emissions from fossil fuel combustion >ourcei
       in terms of concentration (mg/m1) and in
       terms of emission rate {ng/J) and  to the
       determination of carbon dioxvde (CJ,)
       concentration (percent). Moisture, if desired.
       may also be determined by this method.
        The minimum detectable limit, the upper
       limit,- and the interference* of the  method for
       the measurement of SO, are the same at for
      Method 0. For a 20-liter sample, the method
      has  a precision of 0.5 percent CO,  for
      concentrations between 2.5 and 25 percent
      COi and 1.0 percent moisture for moisture
      concentrations greater than 5 percent
        1.2  Principle. The principle of sample
      collection is the same  as for Method 6  except
      that  moisture and CO, are collected In
      addition to SO, in the  tame sampling train.
      Moisture and CO, fractions axe determined
      gravimetrically.
      2. Apparatus
       2.1  Sampling. The sampling train is
      shown in Figure 6A-1: the equipment
     required is the same as for Method 6. except
      as specified belovv:
       2.1.1  Midget Impingers. Two 30-ml midget
     impingers with a 1-rrun restricted tip.
       2.1.2  Midget Bubbler. One 30-ml midget
     bubbler with an unrestricted tip.
       2.1.3  CO, Absorber. One 2SO-ml
     Erlenmeyer bubbler with an unrestricted tip,
     or equivalent.
       2.2  Sample Recovey and Analysis. The
     equipment needed for sample recovery  and
     analysis i» the same as required for Method
     6. In addition, a balance to measure within
     0.05 g is needed for analysis.
     3. Reagents
       Unless otherwise indicated, all reagents
     must conform to the specifications
     established by the Committee on Analytical
     Reagents of the American Chemical Society.
     Where such specifications are not available,
     use the best available grade.
       3.1  Sampling. The reagents required  for
     sampling are the same ai specified in Method
    6, except that 80 percent isopropano! and 10
    percent potassium iodide solutions are not
    required. In addition, the following reagenti
    are required:
                                                           11-138
    

    -------
                                                                                 THERMOMETER
    PROBE (END PACKED''
     WITH QUARTZ OR
       PYREX WOOL)
    STACK WALL                         MIDGET BUBBLERS
    
                     MIDGET IMPINGERS
                                                                  RATE METER     fJEEDLE VALVE
                                        ICE EATH
                                    THERMOMETER
                                                                                          PUMP
                                    Figure 6A-1. Sampling train.        SURGE TANK
                                             11-139
    

    -------
         3.1.1  Orients'.' Anhydrous calcium sulfate
       (CaSOi) desiccant, 3 mesh.
         3.1.2.  Ascarite. Sodium hydroxide.coaled
       asbestos for absorption of CO,. 8 to 20 mesh.
         3.2 Sample Recovery and Analysis. The
       reagents needed for sample recovery and
       analysis are the same as for Method 8,
       Sections 3.2 and 3.3. respectively.
       4. Procedure
         4.1  Sampling
         4.1.1 Preparation ofCollection'Train.
      Measure IS ml of 3 percent hydrogen
      peroxide into each of the first two midget
      impingers. Into the midget bubbler,  place
      about 25 g of drierite. Clean the outsidea of
      the impingeri and  the drierite bubbler and
      weigh (at room temperature, — 20" C) to the
      nearest 0.1 g. Weigh the three vessels
      simultaneously and record this initial mass.
        Place a small amount of glass wool In the
      Erlenmeyer bubbler. The glass wool should
      cover the entire bottom of the  flask  and be
      aboul 1-cm thJdc. Place about 100 g of
      ascarite on top of the glass wool and
      carefully insert the bubbler top. Plug the
      bubbler exhaust leg and invert the bubbler to
      remove any ascarite Com the bubbler tube. A
      wire may be useful in assuring that no
      ascarite remains in the rube. With the plug
      removed and the outside of the bubbler
      cleaned, weigh (at room temperature (at room
      temperature, — 20" C), to the nearest 0.1 g.
      Record this initial mass.
        Assemble the train as shown in Figure 6A-
      1. Adjust the probe heater to a  temperature
      sufficient to prevent water condensation.
      Place crushed ice and water around  the
      impingers and bubblers.
        Note.—For stack  gas streams with high
      participate loadings, an  in-stack or heated
     oul-of-stack glass fiber mat filler may be used
     in place of the glass wool plug in the probe.
       4.1.2 Leak-Check Procedure and Sample
     Collection. The leak-check procedure and
     sample collection procedure are the same as
     specified in Method 6. Sections 4.1.2 and
     4.1.3, respectively.
       4.2  Sample Recovery.
       4.2.1  Moisture Measurement. Disconnect
     the peroxide unpingers and the  drierile
     bubbler from the sample train. Allow time
     (about 10 minutes) for them to reach room
     temperature,  clean the outsides and then
     weigh them simultaneously in the same
     manner as in Section 4.1.1. Record this final
     mass.
       4.2.2  Peroxide Solution. Pour the contents
     of the midget impingers into a leak-free
     polyethylene bottle for shipping. Rinse the
     two midget impingers and connecting tubes
     with deionized distilled water, and add the
    washings to the came storage container.
    
      "Mention of trade ntmei or ipecific producu
    doei not constitute endorsement by the U.S.
    Environmental Protection Ageacy.
         4.2.3  CO, Absorber. Allow the Erlenmeyer
       bubbler to warm to room temperature (aboul
       10 minutes), clean the outside, and weigh to
       the nearest 0.1 g In the same manner as in
       Section 4.1.1. Record this final mass and
       discard the used ascarite.
         4.3  Sample Analysis. The sample analysis
       procedure for SO, is the same as specified in
       Method 6, Section 4 J.
       5. Calibration
         The calibrations and checks are the same
       as required in Method 6, Section S.
       8. Calculations
         Carry out calculations, retaining at least 1
       extra decimal figure beyond that of the
       acquired data. Round off figures after final
       calculation. The calculation nomenclature
       and procedure are the same as specified in
       Method 8 with the addition of the following:
                                  8.1   Nomenclature.
                                CH>*o = Concenlration of moisture, percent
                                co^i:: Concentration of CO,, dry basis.
                                    percent.
                                171,,= Initial mass of peroxide impingers and
                                    drierile bubbler, g.
                                m%1 = Final mass of peroxide impingers and
                                    drierile bubbler, g.
                                01.4 = Initial mass of ascarite bubbler, g.
                                m^ = Final mass of ascarite bubbler, g.
                                VcoM'"<» = Standard equivalent volume of
                                    CO, collected, dry basis, m1.
    
                                 6.2  CO, volume collected, corrected to
                                standard conditions.
                                                   m.,-mj (Eq. 6A-1I
    
                                 6.3  Moisture volume collected, corrected
                                to standard conditions.
                Xstd
    ) •  1.336 x  10~3  (m
                                          -3
    - m  .)
        wi'
    (Eq.  6A-2)
      6.4   SO-  concentration.
                                                   * VC02(std)
                                                                              (Eq.  6A-3)
     6.5   CO-  concentration.
                                       C02(std)
                       C02    Vn,(std)  +
                                                           x  TOO
                                                         (Eq. 6A-4)
     6.6  Moisture concentration.
                                           H0(std)
                                                     _
    
                           7m(std) + VH20(std) + VC0(std)
                                                       (Eq.  6A-5)
    7. Emission Rate Procedure
    
      If the only emission measurement desired
    is in terms of emission rate of SO, (ng/J), an
    abbreviated procedure may be used. The
    differences between Method 6A and the
    abbreviated procedure are described below.
      7.1  Sample Train. The sample train is the
    same us shown iu Figure 6A-1 and as
                             described in Section 4. except that the dry
                             gas meter is not needed.
                               7.2  Preparation of the collat'-ion train.
                             Follow the same procedure as in Section
                             4.1.1. except that the peroxide i.-npingers and
                             drierite bubbler need not be weighed before
                             or after the  test run.       '"-
                               7.3  Sampling, Operate ihe train as
                             described in Section 4.1.3. ercepl that dry 8as
                                                             11-140
    

    -------
      meter readings, barom-tric pressure, and dry
      g*s meter temperatures need not be recorded.
        7.4  Sample Recovery. Follow the
      procedure in Section 4.2. except that the
      peroxide impinge™ and drie.-ile bubbler need
      not be weighed.
                            7.5  Sample Analysis. Analysis of the
                          peroxide solution Is the same as described In
                          Section 4.3.
                            7.6  Calculations.
                            7.6.1  SO, mass collected.
       Where:
    32.03  (Vt  - Vtb)
                     Mass  of  SO-  collected,  mg.
             7.6.2  Sulfur dioxide  emission  rate.
                                                                             (Eq.  6A-7)
                    SO
                           F   (1'829 x  10
     V/liere:
       £30^1 = Emission rate of SO». ng/J.
       F,=Carbon F factor for the fuel burned.
     m'/J. from Method 19.
     8. Bibliography
       8.1  Same as for Method 6, citations 1
     through 8, with the addition of the following:
       8.2  Stanley, Jon and P.R. Westlin. An
     Alternate MeLhod for Slack Gas Moisture
     Determination. Source Evaluation Society
     Newsletter. Volume 3. Number 4. November
     1978.
      8.3 Whittle. Richard N. and P.R. Westlin.
     Air PollutioD Test Report; Development and
     Evaluation of an Intermittent Integrated
     SO./CO. Emission Sampling Procedure.
     Environmental Protection Agency,
    Emission Standard and Engineering
    Division, Emission  Measurement
    Branch. Research Triangle Park. North
    Carolina. December 1979.14 oaeea.
                                                       "SO,
                                                    (Eq. 6A-8)
                        Method 6B—Determination of Sulfur Dioxide
                        and Carbon DioxJde Daily A verage
                        Emissions From Fossil Fuel Combustion
                        Sources
                        1. Applicability and Principle
                          1.1  Applicability. This method applies to
                        the determination of sulfur dioxide (SO,)
                        emissions form combustion sources in terms
                        of concentration (mg/M1) and emission rale
                        (n8/D- ar|d for the determination of carbon
                        dioxide (COi) concentration (percent) on a
                        daily (24 hours) basis.
                         The minimum detectable limit, upper limit,
                        and the interferences for SOi measurements
                        •re the tame as for Method 0. For a 20-liter
                        sample, the method has a precision of 0.5
                        percent CO. for concentrations between 2,5
                        and 25 percent CO..
                         1.2 Principle. A gas sample it extracted
                        from the sampling point in the stack
                        Intermittently over a 24-hour or other
                        specified time period. Sampling may also be
                        conducted continuously if the apparatus and
       procedure are modified (see the note in
       Section 4.1.1). The SO, and CO, are separated
       • nd collected in the sampling train. The SO.
       fraction It measured by the barium-thorin
       titration method and CO. is determined
       yavimetrically.
       2. Apparatus
         The equipment required for this method is
       the same as specified for Method 8A, Section
       2, with the addition of an industrial timer-
       •wilch designed to operate In the "on"
       position from 3 to 5 continuous minutes and
       "off" the remaining period over a repeating,
       2-hour cycle.
      3. Reagents
        All reagents for sampling end analysis are
      the same as described in Method 6A, Section
      3.
      4. Procedure.
        4.1  Sampling
        4.1.1  Preparation of Collection Train.
     Preparation of the sample train Is the «ame »»
     described in Method 6A. Section 4.1.4 with
     the addition of the following-.
       Assemble the train as shown in Figure 6B-
     1. The probe must be heated to a  temperature
     sufficient to prevent  water condensation and
     must include a filter  (either in-slack,  out-of-
     •lack, or both) to prevent particulate
     entrainment in the perioxide impinger*. The
     electric supply for the probe heat should be
     continuous and separate from the timed
     operation of the sample pump.
       Adjust the timer-switch to operate  in the
     "on" position form 2  to  4 minutes on a 2-hour
     repeating cycle. Other timer sequences may
     be used provided there  are at least 12 equal,
     evenly spaced periods of operation over 24
     hours and the total sample volume is
     belwren 20 and 40 liters for the amounts of
     sampling reagents prescribed in this method.
       Add cold water to the tank until the
     Impingers and bubblers are covered at least
     two-thirds of their length. The Lmpingcrs and
    bubbler tank must be covered and protected
    from intense heat and direct  sunlight.  If
    freezing conditions exist the impinger
    solution and the water bath must be
    protected.
                                                            II-1-41
    

    -------
    I
    I—'
    
    l-o
    PRODE (END PACKED'
     WITH QUARTZ OR
       PYREX WOOL)
             fcc
                   X
                            STACK WALL
                                                                                                  THERMOMETER
    
                                                                                  MIDGET nUDDLERS
    
    
                                                                MIDGET IMPINGERS         /\      ff
                                        ICE DATH
                                    THERMOMETER
                                                                 RATE METER    NEEDLE VALVE
                                               DRY
    
                                            GAS f/.ETEft
                                    Figure 6B-1. Sampling train.
                                                                                       SURGE TANK
        .; ..I.i
    

    -------
         Not*.—Sampling may be conducted
       continuously If a low flow-rale sample pump
       (>24ml/min) li used. Then the timer-twitch
       it not necessary. In addition, if the sample
       pump i« designed for constant  rate sampling.
       the rate meter may be deleted. The total gai
       volume collected should be between 20 and
       40 liters for the amounts of sampling reagents
       prescribed in this method.
         4.1.2  Leak-Check Procedure. The leak-
       check procedure is the same as describedf in
       Method 6. Section 4.1.2,
         4.1.3  Sample Collection. Record the initial
       dry gas meter reading. To begin sampling,
       position the tip of the probe at  the sampling
       point, connect the probe to the  first impinger
       (or /ilter). and start the timer and the sample
       pump. Adjust the cample flow to a constant
       rale of approximately 1.0 liter/min ai
       indicated by the rotameler. Assure thai the
       timer is opeiating as Intended, i.e.. in the  "on"
       position 3 to 5 minutes at 2-hour intervals, or
       olher lime interval specified.
         During the 24-hour sampling period, record
       the dry gas meter temperature between 9.OO
       a.m. and 11:00 aja, and the barometric
       pressure.
         At the conclusion of the  run, turn off the
       timer and the sample pump, remove the probe
       from the stack, and record the final gas  meter
       volume reading. Conduct a leak  check as
       described in  Section 4.1.2, If a leak is found.
       void the test  run or use procedures
       acceptable to the Administrator to adjust  the
       s.implc volume for leakage. Repeat the steps
       in  this Section (4.1.3) for successive runs.
        4.2 Sample Recovery. The procedures  for
       sample recovery (moisture  measurement,
      peroxide solution, and ascarite bubbler) are
       the same as in Method 6A,  Section 4.2.
        4.3  Sample Analysis. Analysis  of the
      peroxide impinger solutions is the same  as in
      Method 6. Section 4.3.
      S. Calibration
       5.1 Metering System,
       5.1.1  Initial Calibration. The initial
      calibration for the volume metering system is
      the tame as for Method 6, Section 5.1.1.
       5.1.2  Periodic Calibration Check. After 30
      days of operation of the test train conduct  a
      calibration check as in Section 5.1.1 above.
      except for the following variations: (1) The
      Irak check is not be conducted, (2) three or
      more revolutions of the dry gas meter may  be
      used, and (3) only two independent runs need
      be made. If the calibration factor  does not
      deviate by more than 5 percent from the
      initial calibration factor determined in
     Section 5.1.1, then the dry gas meter volumes
     obtained during the test tenet are acceptable
     and use of the  train can continue. If the
     calibration factor deviates by more  than 5
     percent, recalibrate the metering ivslem as  in
     Section 5.1.1: and for the calculations for the
     preceding 30 doys of data, use the calibration
     factor (initial or recalibralion) that yields the
     lower gas volume for each lest run. Use the
     Ulesl calibration factor  for succeeding tests.
       5.2  Tnemotncterr. Calibrate against
     mercury-in-glais thermometers initially and
     • ! 30-day interval*.
      SJ  Rotamtttr. The rotameler oeed not be
    calibrated, but should be cleaned And
    m«ioLamed according to the manufacturer's
    Inilruction.
          5.4  Barometer. Calibrate against a
        mercury barometer Initially and at 30-day
        intervals.
          5.S  Barium PerchJoraie Solution.
        Standardize the barium perchJorale solution
        against 25 ml of standard sulfuric acid to
        which 100 ml of 100 percent isopropanal has
        been added.
        6. Calculations
         The nomenclature and calculation
       procedures are the seme as in Method 6A
       with the following exceptions:
         Pku = lnitial barometric pressure for the lest
       period, mm Hg.
         T.. = Absolute meter temperature for the
       test period "K.
       7. Emission Kate Procedure
         The emission rate procedure is the same as
       described in Method 6A, Section 7, except
       that the timer is needed and is operated as
       described in this method.
       8. Bibliography
         The bibliography is the same as described
       in Method 6A. Section A.
       •     ••«.•
    
         5. By revising Performance 2 and
       Performance 3 of Appendix B of 40 CFR
       Part 60 to read as follows:
    
       Appendix B—Performance Specifications
      Performance Specification 2—Specifications
      and Test Procedures for SO, and A'O,
      Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
      Stationary Sources
      1. Applicability and Principle
        1.1  Applicability. This specification is to
      be used for evaluating the acceptability of
      SO, and NO, continuous emission monitoring
      systems (CEMS) after the initial installation
      and whenever specified in an applicable
      subpart of the regulations. The CEMS may
      include, for certain stationary sources.
      diluent (O, or CO,) monitors.
       1-2  Principle. Installation and
      measurement location specifications.
      performance  and equipment specifications,
      lest procedures, and data reduction
      procedures axe included in this specification.
      Reference method  (RM) tests and calibration
      drift tests are conducted to determine
     conformance  of the CEMS with the
     specification.
     2. Definition*
       2.1   Continuous  Emission Monitoring
     System (CEMS). The tola) equipment
     required for the determination of a gas
     concentration or emission rale. The system
     consists of the following major subsystems:
       2.1.1  Sample Interface. That portion of the
     CEMS that is used for one or more of the
     following: Simple acquisition, sample
     transportation, and sample conditioning, or
     protection  of the monitor from the elfects of
     the stack effluent
      2.1.2  Pollutant Analyzer. That portion of
    the CEMS that senses the pollutant gat and
     generates an output that is proportjfinal lo the
     gas concentration.
      2.1 J  Diluent Anojyztr (if applicable).
     That portion of the CEMS that sense* the
     diluent gas [e.g, CO, or O,) and generates an
       output that is proportional to the ga*
       concentration.
         2.1.4   Data Recorder. That portion of the
       CEMS that provides a permanent record of
       the analyzer output The data recorder may
       include automatic data reduction  capabilities.
         UL  Point CEMS. A CEMS that measure*
       (he gai concentration either at a single point
       or along  a path that It equal to or  lest than 10
       percent of the equivalent diameter of the
       slack or duct cross section.
         2J  Path CEMS. A CEMS that mesures the
       gas concentration along a path thai is greater
       than 10 percent of the equivalent diuneler of
       the  stack or duct cross section.
         2.4 Span Value. The upper limit of • gal
       concentration measurement range that it
       specified for ajfected source categories in the
       applicable subpart of the reflation*.
         2J  Relative Accuracy. (HA). The absolute
       mean difference between the ga*
       concentration or emission rale determined by
       the CEMS and the value determined by the
       reference method(s) plus the 2-5 percent error
       confidence coefficient of a series of tests
       divided by the mean of the reference method
       (RM) test* or the applicable emission limit
        2.B  Calibration Drift (CD). The  difference
       in the CEMS output readings from the
       established  reference value sfter a staled
      period of operation during which no
      unscheduled maintenance, repair, or
      adjustment took pi a re.
        17  Centroidci Area. A concentric area
      that  is g-ecme^-ica!])- similar to  the stack or
      duct  cross section and is no greater than 1
      percent of the  stack or d-.icl cross-sectional
      area.
        2.8 Representative Results.  As defined l>y
      the RM test procedure outlined in this
      ipecifi cation.
      3.  Installation and Measurement Location
      Specifications
       3.1   CEMS Installation and Mecsurcmcnt
     Location. Install the CEMS at an accessible
     location where the pollutant concentration or
     emission rate measurements ere directly
     representative  or can be corrected so as to be
     representative of the total emissions from the
     affected facility. Then select representative
     measurement poin'J or paths for monitoring
     such that the CEMS will pass the relative
     accuracy (RA) test (see Section 7). If the
     cause of failure to meet the RA test Is
     determined to be  the measurement location,
     the CEMS may be required lo be relocated.
       Suggested measurement locations  and
     points or paths  are listed below; other
     locations and points or paths may be less
     likely  lo provide data that will meet  the RA
     requirement*.           '"-
       3.1.1  CEMS Location. It Is suggested thai
     the measurement location b« al least two
     equivalent diameters downstream from the
     nearest control device or otScr point  at which
     a  change In the pollutant concentration or
     emission rate  may occur and at least a half
     equivalent diameter upstream from the
     efJCuenl exhaust
       3.1.2 Point CEMS. 1\ I* suggested  thai th«
    measurement point,be (1) no lets than 1.0
    meter from the slack or duel wnll. ot (2)
    within or centrally located over loe
    centroidal are« of the slack or doci cro**
    section.
                                                                II-143
    

    -------
         3.1J  Path CEMS. It !i suggested that the
       effective measurement path (1) be totally
       within the Inner ares bounded by a line 1.0
       meter from the stack or duct wall, or [2] have
       • t least 70 percent of the path within tha
       Inner 50 percent of the slack or duct cross-
       lectionaJ aj-ea,  or (3) be centrally located
       over any part of the centroidal area.
        J_2  RM Measurement Location.and
       Traverse Points. Select an RM measurement
       point that ii accessible and at least (wo
       equivalent diameters downstream from the
       nearest control device or other point at which
       • change in the pollutant concentration or
       emission rate may occur and at least a half
       equivalent  diameter upstream  from  the
       effluent exhaust. The CEMS and RM
       locations need not be the tame.
        Then select traverse point* that assure
       acquisition of representative samples over
       the stack or duct cross section. The minimum
       requirements  are as foUowi: Establish a
       "measurement line" that passes through the
      centroidal area. If this line Interferes with the
      CEMS measurements, displace the line up to
      30 cm [or 5 percent of the equivalent diameter
      of the cross section, whichever is less) from
      the centroidal area. Locate three traverse
      point! at 16.7. 50.0, and S3.3 percent of the
      measurement  line. If the measurement  line is
      longer than  2.4 meters, the three traverse
      points may be located on the line at 0.4. 1-2,
      and 2.0 meters from the stack or duct wall.
      The tester may select other traverse points,
      provided that  they can be shown to the
      satisfaction of the Administrator to provide a
      representative sample over the  stack or duct
      cross section. Conduct all necessary RM testa
      within 3 cm  (but no less than 3 cm from the
      (tack or duct wall) of the traverse points.
     4. Performance and Equipment
     Specifications
       4.1  Instrument Zero and Span. The CEMS
     recorder span must be set at 90  to 100 percent
     of recorder full-scale using a span level of 90
     to 100 percent of the span value (the
     Administrator  may approve other span
     levels). The CEMS design must also allow the
     determination of calibration drift at the zero
     and span level  points on the calibration
     curve. If this i» not possible or ia Unpractical,
     the design mud allow these determinations
     to be conducted at a low-level (0 to SO
     percent of span value) point and at a high-
     level [80 to 100 percent of ipan value) point
     In special cases, if not already approved, the
     Administrator may approve a single-point
     calibration-drift determination,
       4_2  Calibration Drjft The CEMS
     calibration must not drift or deviate from the
     reference value of the gas cylinder, gas cell,
     or optical filter  by more than 2.5  percent of
     the ipan value.  U  the CEMS Include*
     pollutant and diluent nonitors, the
     calibration drift must be determined
     separately  for each in terms of concentration*
     (see Performance Specification 3 for tha
     diluent ipecifications).
       4J   C£MS Relative Accuracy. The  RA of
     the CEMS must  be no greater than 20 percent
     of the mean value of the RM test  data In
     tenni of the unjta of the emission standard or
    10 percent of the applicable standard,
    whichever Is greiter.
      5.  Performance Specification Test
      Procedure
        5.1  Pretest Preparation. Install the CEMS
      and prepare the RM test aite according to the
      specificalions In Section 3, and prepare the
      CEMS for operation according to the
      manufacturer's written instruction*.
        5.2   Calibration Drift Test Period. While
      the affected facility is operating at more than
      SO percent capacity, or aa specified in an
      applicable subpart, determine the magnitude
      of the calibration drift (CD) once each day (at
      24-hour intervals) for 7 consecutive days
      according to the procedure given in Section 6.
      To meet the requirement of Section 4.2. none
      of the CD's must exceed (he specification.
        5.3  RA Test Period. Only, after the CEMS -
      passes the CD test, conduct the RA teat
      according to the procedure given in Section 7
      while Ihe affected facility U operating at
      more than 50 percent capacity, or aa specified
      in an applicable subpart. To meet the
      specifications, the RA must be equal to or
      less than 20 percent or 10 percent of the
      applicable standard, whichever ia greater.
      For Instruments  that use common
      components to measure more than one
      effluent gas constituent, all channels must
      simultaneously pass the RA requirement,
      unless it can be demonstrated that any
      adjustments made to one channel did not
     affect the others.
     8.  CEMS Calibration Drift Test Procedure
       The CD measurement la to verify  the ability
     of the CEMS to conform to the established
     CEMS calibration used for determining the
     emission concentration or emission  rate.
     Therefore, if periodic automatic or manual
     adjustments are made  to the CEMS :cro  and/
     or calibration settings, conduct the CD test
     Immediately before these adjustments.
       Conduct the  CD test at the two points
     specified In Section 4.1. Introduce to the
     CEMS the reference  gases, gas cells, or
     optical filters (these  need not be certified).
     Record the CEMS response and subtract  this
     value from the  reference value (see example
     data  sheet In Figure 2-1).
      If an  Increment addition procedure is used
     to calibrate the CEMS, a single-point CD  test
     may be used as follows: Uie an increment
     cell or calibration gaa ith a value that will
    provide a total  CEMS response (Le.. stack
    plus cell concentrations) between 60 and  95
    percent of the span value. Compare the
    difference between the measured CEMS
    response and the  expected CEMS response
    with the increment value to establish the CD.
                                                           11-144
    

    -------
    
    O)
    >
    
    
    -------
       Relative Accuracy Test Procedure
        7.1  Sampling Strategy for RM Tests.
       Conduct the RM tests such that they will
       yield results representative of the emissions
       from the source and can be correlated to the
       CEMS data. Although It Is preferable to -
       conduct the diluent (if applicable), moisture
       (if needed), and pollutant measurement*
       simultaneously, the diluent and moisture
       meesuremenls thai are taken within a 30- to
       eo-mlnule period, which Includes the
      pollutant measurements, may be used to
      calculate dry pollutant concentration and
      emission rate.
        In order to correlate the CEMS and RM
      data properly, mark the  beginning  and end of
      each RM test period of each run (including
      the  exact time ofMhe day) on the CEMS chart
      recordings or other permanent record of
      output. Use  the following strategies for the
      RM tests:
        7.1.1   For integrated samples, e.g.. Method
      0 and Method 4, maVe a  sample traverse of at
      least 21 minutes, sampling for 7 minutes at
      each traverse point
        7.1.2  For grab  samples, e.g. Method 7,
      take one cample at each  traverse point.
      scheduling the grab samples so that they are
      taken simultaneously (within a 3-minute
      period} or are an equal interval of time apart
      over a 21-minule (or less) period.
       Note.—At times, CEMS RA tests  are
      conducted during NSPS performance tests. In
      these cases, RM results obtained during
      CEMS RA tests may be used to determine
      compliance as long as the source and test
      conditions are consistent with the applicable
     regulations,
       7.2 Correlation ojRM and CEMS Data.
     Correlate the CEMS and the RM test data as
     to the time and duration by Erst determining
     from the CEMS final output (the one used for
     reporting) the integrated average  pollutant
     concentration or emission rate for each
     pollutant RM test period.  Consider system
     response time, if important, and confirm thai
     the pair of results are on a consistent
     moisture, temperature, and diluent
     concentration basis. Then, compare  each
                                integrated CEMS value against the
                                corresponding average RM value. Use the
                                following guidelines to make these
                                comparisons.
                                  7-2.1  If the RM has an Integrated sampling
                                technique, make a direct comparison of the
                                RM results and CEMS integrated average
                                value.
                                  7.2-2  If the RM has • grab sampling
                                technique, first average the results from all
                                grab camples taken during the test run and
                                then compare this average value against the
                                integrated value obtained from the CEMS
                                chart recording during the. run.
                                  7 J  Number of RM Tests. Conduct a
                                minimum of nine sets of all necessary RM
                                tests. For grab samples, e.g. Method 7, • set
                                Is made up of at least three separate
                                measurements. Conduct each set within*
                                period of 30 to 60 minutes.
                                  Note.—The tester may choose to perform
                                more than nine sets of RM testa. If this option
                                is chosen, the tester may, at his descrelion.
                               reject a maximum of three sets of the test
                               result! so long as the total number of test
                               results used to determine the relative
                               accuracy is greater than or equal to nine, but
                               he must report all data including the rejected
                               data.
                                 7.4  Reference Methods. Unless otherwise
                               specified in an applicable subpart of the
                               regulations. Methods 6, 7, 3. and 4. or their
                               approved alternatives, are the reference
                               methods for SO,, NO,, diluent (O, or CO,).
                               and moisture, respectively.
                                 7.5  Calculations. Summarize the results
                               on a data sheet; an example is shown in
                               Figure 2-2. Calculate the meaji of the RM
                               values. Calculate the arithmetic differences
                               between the RM and the CEMS output sets.
                               Then calculate the mean of the difference.
                               standard deviation, confidence coefficient,
                               and CEMS RA, using Equations 2-1. 2-2. 2-3.
                               and 2-4.
                              8. Equations
                                C.1  Arithmetic Mean. Calculate the
                              arithmetic mean of the  difference, d. of a data
                              set as follows:
     Where:
           n
           £
         1-1
                                                                                (Eq.  2-D
                      Number of  data points.
    Algebraic  sun  of   the individual  differences, d.
      When the mean of the differences of pair*
    of data is calculated, be sure to correct the
    data for moisture, if applicable.
                                                        11-146
    

    -------
    Run
    No.
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    
    
    Date and
    time
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Average
    so2
    RM
    M
    Diff
    ppmc
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Confidence Interval
    Accuracy0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    <
    RM
    M
    Diff
    ppmc
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    C02 or 02a
    RM
    M
    %d xd
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ^
    RM
    M | Diff
    mass/GCV
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    NO;
    RM| M
    Diff
    mass/GCV
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    H
            'For steam generators;   Average of three samples; c Make sure that RM and M data are on a consistent basis,
                         „....;.,  ,                                 either wot or dry.
    
                                            Figure 2-2.  Relative accuracy determination.
    

    -------
        8.2  Standard Deviation. Calculate the
      standard deviation S, as followi:
                                Wbere:
                                  •0.975 = I-value* face Table 2-1)
    
                                          Table 2-1.1-VALUES
           ft  «,
                     1-1
                        ',)
                                                              U«7S
                                                                          <0.t7J
                                      (to. i-z
        8.3  Confidence Coefficient. Calculate tie    *-
      2.5 percent error confidence coefficient (one-
      tailed) CC is follows:                       ~
                                             12.708     7   2.*47   12   2.J01
                                              4J03     •   ZJ6S   II   2.17*
                                              J.1&2     •   2JO8   14   1160
                                              2.77V    10   12*3   IS   2.14S
                                              1.571    11   1229   1*   2.131
                                                *) vai
                                                      VB]M«* bi lM§ table ar» «V-1
                                                      of Irrrdoox U»e • r<]u*l le the euoibcr of
                                                  a. 4  Relative Accuracy. Calculate the RA
                                                of • tel of data as follows:
                                              led
                                                       X  TOO
                                                           (Eq.  2-4)
     V/here:
             ffl
             ICC
            RM
    = Absolute  value  of  the mean  of differences
    
       (from Equation  2-1).
    
    = Absolute (value  of  the confidence  coefficient
    
       (from Equation  2-3).
    
    =  Average  RM  value  or  applicable  standard.
                                               calculations, and charts (record of data
                                               outputs) that are necessary to substantiate
                                               that the performance CEM$ met the
                                               performance specification.
    9. Reporting
      At a minimum (check with the appropriate
    regional office, or Slate or local agency for
    additional requirement*, if any) summarize in
    tabular form the calibration  drift tests and
    the RA tests. Include all data iheed.
                             10. Bibliography
    
                               10.1  "Experimental Statistics."
                             Department of Commerce. Handbook 91.
                             1963, pp. 3-31. paragraphs 3-3.1.4.
    
                             Performance Specification 3—Specifications
                             and Test Procedures for O, and CO,
                             Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
                             Stationary Sources
       1. Applicability and Principle
         1.1  Applicability. This specification is to
       be u»ed for evaluating the acceptability of 0,
       and CO, continuous emission monitoring
       systems (CEMS) after initial installation and
       whenever specified in an applicable subpart
       of the regulations. Tbe specification applies
       lo O, and CO, monitors that are not included
       under Performance Specification 2.
        The definitions, installation measurement
       location specifications, test procedures, dad
       reduction procedures, reporting requirement!,
       and bibliography are the same as in
       Performance Specification 2, Sections 2, 3, 5,
       6. 8. 9. and 10. and also apply lo O, and C0t
       CEMS under this specification. The
      performance and equipment specifications
      and the  relative accuracy (RA) lest
      procedures  for O, and CO, CEMS differ from
      SO, and NO, CEMS, unless otherwise noted,
      and are therefore included here.
        1.2  Principle. Reference method (RM)
      tests and calibration drift tests are conducted
      to determine conformance of the CEMS with
      the specification.
      2. Performance and Equipment
      Specifications
        2.1   Instrument Zero and Span. ThU
      specification is the same as Section 4.1 of
      Performance Specification 2.
       2.2   Calibration Drift. The CEMS
      calibration must not drift by more than 0.5
     percent O, or CO, from the reference  value of
     the gas, gas cell, or optical filter.
       2-3   CEMS Relative Accuracy. The RA of
     the CEMS roust be no greater than 20  percent
     of the mean value of the RM lest data or 1.0
     percent O, or CO,, whichever is greater.
     3. Relative Accuracy Test Procedure
       3.1  Sampling Strategy for RM Tests,
     correlation of RM and CEMS data, Number
     of RM Tests,  and Calculations. This is the
     same as Performance Specification 2,
     Sections 7.1. 7.2. 7J. and 7.5. respectively.
       3.2  Reference Meihod. Unless otherwise
     specified in an applicable subpart of the
     regulations. Method 3 of Appendix A or any
     approved alternative is the reference method
    for O, or CO*.
    (Sec. 114. Clean Air Act. as amended [42
    U.S.C 7414)}
     [TR Doc. I1-2&37 FJlnJ 1-rV-ei: US >n]
                                                           11-148
    

    -------
    SIP MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - PROMULGATED
                     11-149
    

    -------
                                                  RULES AND  KEGUIATIONS
        Tttlt 40—Protection of Environment
          CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL
              PROTECTION AGENCY
          SUBCMAPTtR C—AIR PROGRAMS
                  |PRL 423-61
    
     PART  51—REQUIREMENTS   FOR  THE
       PREPARATION.  ADOPTION  AND  SUB-
       MITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
     Emission  Monitoring of Stationary Sources
    
       On September 11, 1974. the Environ-
     mentafTProtertion Agency (EPA)  pro-
     posed revisions  to 40  CFR Part 51. Re-
     quirements for  the  Preparation, Adop-
     tion, and Submittal of Implementation
     Plans. EPA proposed to expand 5 51.19 to
     require States to revise their State Im-
     plementation Plans (SIP's)   to include
     legally  enforceable procedures requiring
     certain specified  categories  of existing
     stationary sources to  monitor emissions
     on a continuous basis.  Revised SIP's sub-
     mitted  by States in response to the pro-
     cosed revisions  to 40  CFR 51.19 would
    • have (1)  required owners or  operators
     of  specified  categories  of   stationary
     sources to install emission  monitoring
     equipment within one year of plan ap-
     proval. (2)  specified  the  categories  of
     sources subject to the  requirements, (3)
     identified  for each category  of sources
     the pollutant(s)  which must  be moni-
     tored, (4)  set forth performance specifi-
     cations for continuous  emission monitor-
     ing instruments.  required that such
     Instruments meet performance specifi-
     cations through  on-site testing by the
     owner or  operator, and (6) required that
     data derived from such  monitoring  be
     summarized and made available to the
     State on a quarterly basis.
       As a minimum, EPA  proposed  that
     States must adopt and implement legally
     enforceable procedures to require moni-
     toring of emissions for existing sources
     In the  following source categories  (but
     only for sources required  to limit  emis-
     sions to comply with an adopted regula-
     tion of the State Implementation Plan):
       (a) Coal-fired  steam   generators  of
     more than 250 million BTU per hour heat
     input (opacity, sulfur  dioxide,  oxides  ol
     nitrogen and oxygen);
       (b> Oil-fired steam generators of more
     than 250 million BTU  per hour heat In-
     put  fsulfur dioxide,  oxides  of nitrogen
     and oxygen). An opacity monitor was re-
     quired only if an emission control device
     is needed  to meet particulate emission
     regulations, or if violations  of visible
     emission regulations are noted;
       (c) Nitric  acid  plants  (oxides of
    nitrogen);
       (d) Sulfuric  acid  plants  fsulfur di-
    oxide);  and
      (e> Petroleum refineries' fluid catalytic
    cracking  unit  catalyst   regenerators
     (opacity).
      Simultaneously,  the  Agency  proposed
    similar continuous emission monitoring
    requirements for new sources for each of
    the previously identified source categor-
    ies, subject  to the provisions of federal
    New Source Performance  Standards set
    forth in 40 CFR Part 60. Since many of
    the technical aspects of the two proposals
    were similar, if not the same, the  pro-
     posed regulations for Part 51 (i.e..,those
     relating to SIP's and existing  sources)
     included by reicrcnrr many specific tech-
     nical details set forth in 40 CFR Part 60,
     (39 FR 32852).
       At the time of the proposal of the con-
     tinuous emission monitoring regulations
     in  the FEDERAL REGISTER, the Agency in-
     vited comments on the proposed  rule-
     makinK action  Many interested parties
     submitted comments. Of the 76 comments
     received,  35 were  from electric  utility
     companies, 26 were from oil refineries or
     other industrial companies, 12 were from
     governmental agencies, and 3 were from
     manufacturers and'or suppliers of emis-
     sion  monitors.  No  comments  were re-
     ceived from environmental groups. Fur-
     ther, prior to the proposal  of the regula-
     tions in the FEDERAL REGISTER, the Agency
     sought comments from various State and
     local air pollution control agencies and
     instrument manufacturers.  Copies  of
     each of these comments  are  available
     for public inspection at the EPA Freedom
     of  Information  Center, 401  M  Street.
     S.W..  Washington.  D.C.  20460.  These
     commenls  have  been  considered, addi-
     tional information collected and assessed,
     and where  determined by  the Adminis-
     trator to  be appropriate,  revisions and
     amendments have  been  made  in for-
     mulating these regulations promulgated
     herein.
      General  Discussion of Comments.  In
     general, the comments received  by the
     Agency tended to raise various objections
     with specific portions of  the regulations.
     Some misinterpreted the proposed reg-
     ulations,  not   realizing  that  emission
     monitoring under the proposal was not
     required unless a source  was  required to
     comply with an adopted emission limita-
     tion or sulfur in fuel limitation that was
     part of an approved or promulgated State
     Implementation Plan.  Many  questioned
     the Agency's authority and the  need  to
     require sources to use continuous  emis-
     sion monitors. Others stated that the
     proposed regulations were inflationary,
     and by themselves could not reduce emis-
     sions to the atmosphere nor  could they
     improve air quality. A relatively common
     comment was that the benefits to be de-
     rived from the proposed  emission moni-
     toring program  were not commensurate
     with the costs associated with  the pur-
     chase, installation, and operation of such
     monitors. Many'stated that the proposed
     regulations  were not cost-effectively ap-
     plied  and  they  objected to  all  sources
     within an identified  source category be-
    ing required to monitor emissions, with-
    out regard  for other considerations. For
    instance, some suggested  that it was un-
    necessary   to  monitor  emissions  from
    steam generating plants  that may  soon
    be retired from operation, or  steam gen-
    erating boilers that are infrequently used
     (such as for peaking and cycling opera-
    tions)  or  for  those sources  located in
    areas of the nation which presently have
     ambient concentrations better than na-
    tional ambient air quality standards. This
     latter comment was  especially prevalent
    In relation  to the need  for  continuous
    emission monitors designed to  measure
    emissions of oxides of nitrogen. Further,
    commentors  generally  suggested  that
     state and local control  agencies,  rather
     than  EPA  should  be  responsible  for
     determining which sources should moni-
     tor  emissions.  In this regard, the corn-
     mentors suggested that  a determination
     of the sources  which should install con-
     tinuous  monitors should be made on a
     case-by-case oasJs. Almost all objected to
     the  data reporting requirements stating
     that the proposed requirement of sub-
     mission of all collected data was excessive
     and burdensome. Comments from state
     and local air pollution control agencies in
     general  were similar to those from the
     utility and industrial groups, but in addi-
     tion, some indicated that the manpower
     needed to implement  the programs re-
     quired by the  proposed  regulations was
     not  available.
       Rationale  for  Emission   Monitoring
     Regulation. Presently, the Agency's reg-
     ulations setting  forth the requirements
     for  approvable SIP's  require States to
     have legal authority to require owners
     or operators of stationary sources  to in-
     stall, maintain, and use emission  moni-
     toring  devices  and  to  make  periodic
     reports of emission data to the  State
     (40 CFR 51.11 (a) (6)). This  requirement
     was  designed to partially implement the
     requirements of Sections 110(a)(2>(F)
     'ii) and (iii) of the Clean Air Act,  which
     state that implementation  plans must
     provide  "requirements for  installation
     of equipment by owners or  operators of
     stationary sources to monitor emissions
     from such sources",  and "for periodic
     reports on the  nature and  amounts of
     such  emissions". However,  the  original
     Implementation plan  requirements  did
     not require SIP's to contain legally en-
     forceable procedures mandating contin-
     uous emission monitoring and recording.
     At the  time the original requirements
     were published, the Agency had accumu-
     lated little data on the availability and
     reliability of continuous  monitoring de-
     vices.  The  Agency  believed  that  the
     state-of-the-art  was  such that it was
     not prudent  to require existing sources
     to Install such devices.
       Since that time, much work has been
     done by  the Agency and others to field
     test  and compare various   continuous
     emission monitors. As a result of this
     work, the Agency now believes that for
     certain  sources, performance specifica-
     tions for accuracy, reliability and  dura-
     bility can be established for continuous
     emission  monitors  of  oxygen,  carbon
     dioxide,  sulfur  dioxide,  and  oxides of
     nitrogen and for the continuous meas-
     urement of opacity. Accordingly, it is
     the Administrator's judgment that Sec-
     tions 110(a)(2)(F)  (ID and  (111) should
     now be more fully imolemented.
      The  Administrator  believes  that a
     sound program of continuous emission
     monitoring and reporting will play an
     important  role   in the effort  to attain
     and maintain national standards. At the
     present time, control agencies rely upon
     infrequent manual  source   tests  and
     periodic  field  inspections  to  provide
     much of  the enforcement information
    necessary  to ascertain  compliance of
    sources with  adopted regulations. Man-
    ual source tests are generally performed
    on a relatively  infrequent basis, such as
                                  RMIAL UCISTEI, VOL 40, NO. 1»4	MONDAY, OCTOtU  4, 1?7i
                                                           11-150
    

    -------
                                                  RULES AND REGULATIONS
     once per year, and in some cases, affected
     sources probably have never been tested.
     Manual stack tests  are generally  per-
     formed under optimum  operating  con-
     ditions, and as such, do not reflect the
     full-time  emission   conditions from  a
     source. Emissions continually  vary  with
     fuel firing  rates, process material  feed
     rates and various other operating condi-
     tions.  Since manual  stack tests are  only
     conduced for a relatively short  period
     of time (e.g.. one to three hours',  they
     cannofbe representative  of all operating
     conditions.   Further,  frequent manual
     stack  tests  (such as  conducted on a
     quarterly or more frequent  basis'   are
     costly and may be more  expensive than
     continuous  monitors  that provide much
     more  Information.   State  Agency   en-
     forcement  by field  Inspection  is  also
     sporadic, with only occasional inspection
     of certain  sources,  mainly for  visible
     emission enforcement.
       Continuous emission monitoring  and
     recording systems, on the other hand,
     can provide a continuous  record of emis-
     sions under all operating  conditions. The
     continuous  emission  monitor is a good
     Indicator of whether a source is using
     good operating and  maintenance prac-
     tices to minimize emissions to the  at-
     mosphere and can also provide a valu-
     able record to Indicate the performance
     of a source  in complying  with applicable
     emission control  regulations. Addition-
     ally, under certain  Instances, the data,
     from continuous monitors  may be  suf-
     ficient  evidence to issue ft notice of  vio-
     lation.  The  continuous emission record
     can also be utilized to  signal a plant
     upset or equipment malfunction so  that
     the  plant operator can take corrective
     action to reduce  emissions. Use of emis-
     sion monitors can therefore provide  val-
     uable information to-minimize emissions
     to the  atmosphere and  to assure that
     full-time control  effprts. such  as good
     maintenance  and operating conditions,
     are being utilized by source operators.
       The,Agency believes that it is necessary
     to establish national  minimum  require-
     ments for emission monitors for specified
     sources rather than allow States to de-
     termine on a case-by-case basis the spe-
     cific sources  which need to continuously
     monitor emissions. The categories speci-
     fied in the regulations represent very  sig-
    nificant sources of emissions to the at-
    mosphere.  States in  developing  SIP's
    have generally adopted control regula-
    tions to  minimize emissions from these
    sources. Where such regulations exist, the
    Agency believes that continuous emission
    monitors are necessary to provide infor-
    mation  that may be used to provide  an
    Indication of source compliance. Further.
    it  is believed that if the  selection  of
    sources  on a case-by-case  basis were  left
     to the  States, that some States would
     probably  not undertake  an  adequate
     (mission  monitoring  program.   Some
     8UU Agencies who commented on  the
     propowd  regulations  questioned   the
     •Ut«-of-the-art of emission monitoring
     ww iut*d their  opinion  that  the pro-
     P»«l   requirements  were  premature.
     Th»r»foT8.  It  U the  Administrator's
     )w*m«t that. In order to assure  an
     adequate  nationwide  emission  monl-
     torine pi'oenim. minimum emission mon-
     itorinp requirement* must be established.
       The source categories  affected  by the
     regulation1!  were selected because  they
     are significant sources of emissions and
     because the  Agency's work at the time of
     the proposal of these retaliations In the
     field of  continuous emission  monitoring
     evaluation focused almost exclusively on
     these source categories.  The  Agency is
     continuing to develop data on monitoring
     devices  for additional source categories.
     It is EPA's intent to expand the minimum
     continuous emission monitoring require-
     ments from  time to time when the eco-
     nomic and  technological feasibility  of
     continuous  monitoring  equipment  is
     demonstrated and where such monitor-
     ing is deemed appropriate for other sig-
     nificant source  categories.
       Discussion ol Major Comments. Many
     rommentors discussed  the various cost
     aspects of the proposed regulations, spe-
     cifically stating  that  the costs of con-
     tinuous  monitors  were excessive and In-
     flationary. A total of 47 commentors ex-
     pressed  concern for the cost and/or cost
     effectiveness  of  continuous  monitors.
     Further, the Agency's cost estimates for
     purchasing  and  installing  monitoring
     systems  and the costs for data reduction
     and reporting were questioned. In many
     cases, sources provided cost estimates for
     installation and operation of  continuous
     monitors considerably in excess of the
     cost estimates provided by the Agency.
       In response to these comments, a fur-
     ther review was undertaken by the Agen-
     cy  to assess the cost impact of the regu-
     lations. Three conclusions resulted from
     this review. First, it was determined that
     the cost ranges of the various emission
     monitoring  systems   provided  by  the
     Agency  are  generally  accurate for  new
     sources.   Discussions  with   equipment
     manufacturers "and suppliers confirmed
     this cost information. Approximate in-
     vestment costs, which include the  cost
     of the emission monitor. Installation cost
     at a new facility,  recorder, performance
     testing, data  reporting systems and asso-
     ciated engineering costs are as follows:
     for opacity,  520,000;  for  sulfur dioxide
     and oxygen  or  oxides of nitrogen  and
     oxygen,  S30.000:  and for a source that
     monitors opacity, oxides of nitrogen, sul-
     fur dioxide and oxygen, $55,000. Annual
     operating costs, which include data 're-
     duction  and  report preparation,  system
     operation,  maintenance, utilities,  taxes,
     insurance and  annualized capital  costs
     at 109; for 8 years are: $8.500; $16.000;
     and $30.000  respectively  for the cases
     described above.) 1)
      Secondly,  the  cost  review indicated
     that the cost of installation of emission
     monitors  for existing  sources could  be
     considerably  higher than for new sources
     because  of the difficulties in providing
     access to a sampling location that  can
     provide a representative sample of emis-
    sions. The cost estimates provided by the
    Agency in the proposal were specifically
     developed  for  new sources  whose  in-
    stallation costs are relatively stable since
     provisions for monitorinc  equipment cnn
    be incorporated at the time of plant de-
    sign. This feature is not available for ex-
     isting sources, hence higher costs  gei
     erally result.  Actual  costs of installatir
     at existing sources may vary from  01
     to five times the cost of normal instalb
     tion  at  new sources, and in  some cas<
     even higher costs can result  For exam
     pie. discussions with Instrument suppl:
     ers indicate that a typical cost of instal
     latlon of an opacity monitor on an exisi
     ing source may be two to three times tlv
     purchase price of  the monitor. Difficul
     ties also exist for Installation of  gaseou
     monitors at existing sources.
       It should be noted that these installs
     tion costs Include material costs for seal
     folding,  ladders,  sampling  ports  an-
     other items necessary to  provide acce?
     to a location  where source emissions cai
     be measured. It  is the Agency's  opinio:
     that  such  costs cannot  be solely attrib
     uted  to these continuous emission moni
     toring regulations.  Access to samplini
     locations is generally necessary to dc
     termine  compliance with applicable stati
     or local  emission limitations  by  routint
     manual  stack testing methods.  There-
     fore,  costs of providing  access to a rep-
     resentative sampling location are more
     directly  attributed to the cost of com-
     pliance  with, adopted  emission  limita-
     tions,  than with  these continuous emis-
     sion monitoring  regulations.
       Lastly, the  review  of cost information
     indicated that a  numb;r of commentor-
     misinterpreted the  extent of the pro-
     posed regulations, thereby  providing cost
     estimates for continuous monitors which
     were  not required  Specifically, all com-
     mentors  did not recognize that the pro-
     posed regulations required emission mon-
     itoring for a source only if an applicable
     State or local emission limitation of an
     approved SIP affected such a source. For
     example, if the  approved SIP did not
     contain an adopted control regulation to
     limit oxides  of  nitrogen  from  steam-
     generating, fossil fuel-fired boilers of a
     capacity in excess of 250  million BTU per
     hour  heat  input, then such source need
     not monitor  oxides  of  nitrogen  emis-
     sions. Further, some utility industry com-
     mentorn  Included the costs of continuous
     emission monitors for sulfur dioxide. The
     propossd regulations, however, generally
     allowed the use of fuel analysis by speci-
     fied ASTM  procedures as an alternative
     which, in most cases, is less expensive
     than continuous monitoring. Finally, the
     proposed regulations required the con-
     tinuous  monitoring  of  oxygen  in  the
     exhaust  gas  only  if  the source must
     otherwise continuously monitor oxides of
     nitrogen  or sulfur  dioxide. Oxygen in-
     formation is used solely to  provide a cor-
     rection for  excess  air when converting
     the measurements of gaseous pollutants
     concentrations in the exhaust gas stream
     to units  of an applicable emission limi-
     tation. Some eommentors did  not recog-
     nize this  point (which was not specifical-
     ly stated In the. proposed regulations)
     and provided  cost estimates for  oxygen
     monitors when thev were not required by
     the proposed regulations.
      While  not all commentors' cost esti-
     mates  were correct, for  various reasons
    noted above, it is  clear that the costs
     associated   with   implementing   these
    emission  monitoring regulations are sig-
                                          UCIJTit, VOL  40, NO. I»4—MONOAV, OCTOIEI *, 1*75
                                                             11-151
    

    -------
                                                  RULES  AND  REGULATIONS
     niftcant. The  Administrator,  however.
     believes that the benefits to be derived
     from emission monitoring are such that
     the costs are not unreasonable. The Ad-
     ministrator  does,  however,  agree with
     many commentors that the proposed reg-
     ulations, in some cases, were not applied
     cost-effectively  and, as such, the regula-
     tions promulgated  herein  have  been
     modified to  provide exemptions to cer-
     tain sources from these  minimum  re-
     quirements.
      One ^comment from another  Federal
     Agency" concerned the time  period that
     emissions  are to be averaged when  re-
     porting excess emissions Specifically, the
     commentor  assumed  that the  emission
     control  regulations   that  have  been
     adopted by State and local agencies were
     generally designed to  attain  annual am-
     bient air quality standards. As such, the
     commentor  pointed out that  short-term
     emission levels  in excess of the adopted
     emission standard should be acceptable
     for reasonable periods of time.
      The Administrator does not agree with
     this rationale for the following reasons.
     First, it is not universally true  that an-
     nual ambient standards were the design
     basis of emission control regulations.  In
     many cases,  reductions  to attain short-
     term standards  require  more  control
     than do annual standards. Even if  the
     regulations  were  based  upon  annual
     standards, allowing excess emissions of
     the adopted  emission  control regulation
     on  a short-term basis could cause non-
     compliance with annual standards. More
     importantly, however, a policy of legally
     allowing excesses of adopted control reg-
     ulations would in effect make the current
     emission limitation unenforceable If the
     suggestion were implemented, a question
     would arise  as  to what is the maximum
     emission level that would not be consid-
     ered an excess to the adopted regulation.
     The purpose of the adopted emission lim-
     itation  was  to  establish the acceptable
     emission level. Allowing emissions in ex-
     cess of  that adopted  level would  cause
     confusion, ambiguity,  and in many cases
     could result in an unenforceable situa-
     tion. Hence  the Administrator  does not
     concur with  the commentor's suggestion.
      Modifications  to the Proposed  Regu-
     lations.  The modification to the  regu-
     lations  which has the most  significant
     impact involves  the monitoring require-
     ments  for oxides of  nitrogen  at  fossil
     fuel-fired steam generating  boilers and
     at nitric acid plants  Many commentors
     correctly noted that the Agency  in the
     past (June 8, 1973. 38 FR 15174-1 had in-
     dicated  that the need for many emis-
     sion  control  regulations for oxides  of
     nitrogen were  based  upon  erroneous
     data. Such a statement  was  made after
    m detailed laboratory analysis of the ref-
     erence  ambient  measurement  method
     for nitrogen  dioxide revealed  the method
    to  give  false  measurements.  The
    sampling technique generally  Indicated
    concentrations   of    nitrogen   dioxide
    higher  than actually  existed  in the
    •tmosphere.  Since many  control agen-
    cies  prior to that  announcement  had
    •dopted emission regulations that were
     determined  to  be needed based  upon
     these erroneous data, and since new data,
     collected  by other  measurement tech-
     niques, indicated th.it in most areas of
     the nation such control regulations were
     not necessary to satisfy the requirements
     of the  SIP.  the Agency suggested that
     States  consider  the  withdrawal  of
     adopted control regulations for the con-
     trol of oxides of nitrogen from their SIP's
     (May  8. 1914.  39  FR  16344). In many
     States, control agencies have not taken
     action to remove these regulations from
     the SIP. Hence, the commentors pointed
     out that the proposed  regulations to re-
     quire continuous emission  monitors on
     sources affected by  such regulations is
     generally unnecessary.
      Because  of the unique  situation in-
     volving oxides  of nitrogen  control regu-
     lations, the  Administrator  has  deter-
     mined that the proposed  regulations to
     continuously monitor oxides of nitrogen
     emissions may  place an undue burden on
     source operators, at least from a stand-
     point of EPA specifying minimum moni-
     toring  requirements.  The  continuous
     emission  monitoring  requirements  for
     such sources therefore have been  modi-
     fied. The final regulations require  the
     continuous   emission   monitoring   of
     oxides of nitrogen  only for  those sources
     in Air Quality Control Regions (AQCR's >
     where  the Administrator has specifically
     determined  that a control  strategy for
     nitrogen dioxide  is necessary.  At  the
     present time such  control strategies are
     required only for  the  Metropolitan  Los
     Angeles Intrastate and  the Metropoli-
     tan Chicago Interstate  AQCR's.
      It should be  noted that a recent com-
     pilation  of  valid  nitrogen dioxide air
     quality data suggests that approximately
     14 of the other  245 AQCR's in the nation
     may need to develop a control strategy
     for nitrogen  dioxide. These AQCR's are
     presently being evaluated by the Agency.
     If any additional AQCR's are identified
     as needing a control strategy for nitro-
     gen  dioxide at  that time,   or any time
     subsequent to  this promulgation, then
     States  in  which those AQCR's are lo-
     cated  must also revise  their SIP's  to
     require continuous  emission monitoring
     for  oxides  of  nitrogen  for  specified
     sources. Further, it should be noted that
     the regulations promulgated  today  are
     minimum  requirements, so  that  States,
     if  they believe  the control  of oxides of
     nitrogen from sources  is necessary may,
     as they deem  appropriate, expand  the
     continuous emission monitoring require-
     ments  to apply  to additional sources not
    affected by these minimum requirements.
      Other modifications  to the proposed
     regulation  resulted from  various com-
    ments. A number of commentors  noted
     that the proposed regulations included
    some sources whose emission impact on
     air quality was  relatively minor. Specifi-
    cally, they noted  that fossil fuel-fired
    steam  generating units that  were  used
    solely for peaking  and cycling purposes
     should be exempt from  the proposed reg-
     ulations. Similarly, some succcsted that
     smaller sized units, particularly steam-
     generating  units less than  2.500 million
    BTU per hour heat input, should also
     be exempted. Others  pointed out  that
    units soon to be  retired  from operation
    should not  be required  to  install  con-
    tinuous  monitoring  devices  and  that
    sources located  in  areas of  the nation
    that already  have air quality better  than
    the national standards should be relieved
    of the required monitoring and reporting
    requirements. The Agency has considered
    these comments  and has made  the fol-
    lowing judgments.
      In  relation to  fossil fuel-fired steam
    generating units, the Agency has deter-
    mined that such  units that have an an-
    nual boiler capacity factor of 30% or less
    as currently defined by the Federal Power
    Commission  shall be exempt from the
    minimum requirements  for monitoring
    and  reporting. Industrial boilers used at
    less  than 307r of their annual capacity,
    upon demonstration  to  the State,  may
    also  be granted an exemption from these
    monitoring requirements. The rationale
    for this exemption is based upon  the fact
    that all generating units do not  produce
    power at their full capacity at all times.
    There are three major classifications of
    power plants based  on  the degree  to
    which their rated capacity is utilized on
    an annual basis.  Baseload units are de-
    signed to run at near full  capacity almost
    continuously. Peaking units are operated
    to supply electricity during periods  of
    maximum system demand. Units which
    are  operated for intermediate  service
    between  the  extremes of baseload and
    peaking are termed cycling units.
      Generally  accepted definitions   term
    units generating  60  percent or more  of
    their annual  capacity as  baseload, those
    generating less than 20 percent as peak-
    ing and those between 20 and 60 percent
    as cycling. In general, peaking units are
    older, smaller, of lower  efficiency, and
    moro costly to operate than base load  or
    cycling units. Cycling units are also  gen-
    erally  older, smaller and  less  efficient
    than base load units. Since the expected
    life of peaking units is  relatively  short
    and  total emissions from such units are
    small,  the benefits  gained  by installing
    monitoring  instruments   are  small  in
    comparison  to the cost  of such equip-
    ment. For cycling units,  the question  of
    cost-effectiveness is more difficult to as-
    certain. The units  at the upper end  of
    the capacity factor range (i.e.. near 60^
    boiler capacity factor) are candidates for
    continuous  emission monitoring while
    units at the lower end of the range (i.e..
    near 207  boiler capacity factor* do not
    represent good  choices  for  continuous
    monitors. Based  upon available emission
    information,  it has been  calculated  that
    fossil fuel-fired steam generating plants
    with a 307r or less annual boiler capacity
    factor contribute  approximately  less
    than 5O  of the total sulfur dioxide from
    all such  power  plants.  (2)  Hence, the
    final regulations do not afTert any boiler
    that has an annual boiler capacity factor
    of less than  SOCr  Monitoring require-
    ments will thus be more cost effectively
    applied  to the newer, larger, and more
    efficient  units that  burn a  relatively
    Iftrrer portion of the total fuel supply.
      Some commentors noted that  the age
    of the facility should be considered  in
    relation to whether  a source need com-
                                  KDHAl IJGIJTU,  VOL 40, NO. It4—MONDAY,  OCTOtH *, 1«7S
                                                            11-152
    

    -------
                                                  RULES AND REGULATIONS
     ply  with the proposed regulations. For
     fossil fuel-fired steam generating units.
     the  exemption  relating to  the  annual
     boiler capacity  factor  previously  dis-
     cussed should generally provide relief for
     older units. It is appropriate, however,
     that the age of the facility  be  consid-
     ered for other categories of sources  af-
     fected by  the proposed regulations. As
     such, the final regulation!: allow thnt any
     source "5hat  Is  scheduled  to  be  retired
     within five years of the inclusion of mon-
     HorlngTrequirements for the source in
     Appendix P  need not comply with the
     minimum emission  monitoring require-
     ments promulgated herein. In the  Ad-
     ministrator's  judgment,  the selection of
     five  years as the  allowable  period  for
     this exemption  provides reasonable  re-
     lief  for  those units that will  shortly be
     retired.  However, It maintains  full  re-
     quirements on many older units with a
     number  of years of service remaining.
     In general, older units  operate less  effi-
     ciently and are  less well controlled  than
     newer units so that emission monitoring
     is generally useful.  The exemption pro-
     vided In the  final regulations effectively
     allows such retirees slightly more than a
     two-year period of relief, since the sched-
     ule of implementation of the regulations
     would generally require the installation
     of emission   monitors   by early  1978.
     States must  submit, for EPA approval.
     the  procedures  they will implement to
     use  this provision. States are  advised
     that such exemptions should only be pro-
     vided where  a bona fide intent to cease
     operations has been clearly established.
     In cases where  such sources postpone
     retirement. States shall have established
     procedures to require  such sources to
     monitor  and  report emissions. In this re-
     gard, it  should  be noted  that Section
     113(c> (2) of  the Act provides that any
     person who falsifies or misrepresents a
     record, report or other document  filed or
     required  under the Act shall,  upon  con-
     viction,  be subject to fine or Imprison-
     ment, or both.
       A  further modification to the proposed
     regulations affects  the minimum size of
     the units within each of the source cate-
     gories to  which emission monitoring and
     reporting shall be required. As suggested
     by many  commentors. the Agency has in-
     vestigated  the cost effectiveness of re-
     quiring   all units  within  the identified
    source categories to install emission mon-
     itors. Each pollutant for each  source
     category  identified  in the proposed reg-
     ulations  was  evaluated. For fossil fuel-
     fired  steam generating units."the  pro-
     posal required compliance for all boilers
    with 250  million BTU per hour heat in-
    put, or greater. For opacity, the proposed
    regulations required  emission monitoring
    for all coal-fired  units, while only those
    oil-fired  units that had been observed as
    violators  of visible  emission regulations
    or must use an emission control device to
    meet particulate matter regulations  were
    required  to install  such  devices. Gas-
    fired units were  exempted by the  pro-
    posed regulations.
      After   investigating  the particulate
    emission  potential of these sources. It has
     been determined that no modification In
     the size limitation for boilers in relation
     to opacity is warranted. The rationale
     for this  Judgment is  that  the smaller-
     sized units affected by the proposed reg-
     ulation tend to be less efficiently  oper-
     ated or controlled for particulate matter
     than are the larger-sized units. In fact.
     smaller units generally tend to emit more
     particulate  emissions  on an equivalent
     fuel basis than  larger-sized units.  '21
     Because  of the potential of opacity regu-
     lation violations, no modifications have
     been made  to  the regulations as to  the
     size of  steam generating  boilers  that
     must measure  opacity.
      Emissions  of oxides of nitrogen  from
     boilers are a function of the temperature
     in the combustion chamber and the cool-
     ing of the combustion products.  Emis-
     sions vary considerably with the size and
     the type  of  unit.  In general, the larner
     units produce  more oxides  of  nitrogen
     emissions. The Agency  therefore  finds
     that the minimum size of a  unit affected
     by the final regulations can be increased
     from 250 to  1.000 million BTU per hour
     heat input,  without significantly reduc-
     ing the total emissions of oxides of nitro-
     gen that would be affected by monitoring
     and reporting requirements. Such a mod-
     ification would  hnve the effect of exempt-
     ing  approximately 56%  of  the boilers
     over 250 million BTU per hour heat input
     capacity, on a national basis, while main-
     taining emission monitoring and report-
     ing requirements for approximately 78%
     of the potential oxides of nitrogen emis-
     sions from such sources.^'  Further, in
     the 2 AQCR's  where the Administrator
     has  specifically  called  for  a control
     strategy for nitrogen dioxide, the boilers
     affected by the  regulation constitute 50%
     of the steam  generators greater than 250
     million  BTU per  hour heat input, yet
     they emit 807, of the nitrogen oxides
     from such  steam  generators in these
     2 AQCR's.(2)
      Also, certain types of boilers or burn-
     ers, due  to  their design characteristics.
     may on a regular basis attain emission
     levels of  oxides of nitrogen well  below
     the emission limitations of  the  applica-
     ble  plan.  The regulations have been re-
     vised to  allow  exemption  from  the
     requirements   for  installing  emission
     monitoring and recording equipment for
     oxides  of nitrogen  when  a  facility is
     shown during performance  tests to op-
     erate with oxides of nitrogen emission
     levels 30% or  more  below the emission
    limitation  of  the  applicable  plan.  It
    should be noted that, this provision ap-
     plies solely to  oxides of nitrogen emis-
     sions rather  than  other pollutant emis-
    sions, since oxides of nitrogen emissions
    are  more  directly related to boiler de-
     sign   characteristics   than   are  other
     pollutants.
      Similar evaluations  were  made for
    nitric acid plants, sulfuric   acid plants
    and catalytic cracking unit catalyst re-
     generators at petroleum refineries.  For
    each of these Industries it was found that
    modifications to the proposed regulations
    could be  made  to increase the minimum
    size of the units affected by the proposed
    regulations   without   significantly   de-
    creasing  the  total emissions of various
     pollutants  that  would  be affected by
     these monitoring and reporting require-
     ments. Specifically, for nitric acid plants
     it was found that by modifying the pro-
     posed  regulations  to affect only  those
     plants that have a total daily production
     capacity of 300 tons or more of nitric acid
     (rather  than affecting  all facilities as
     proposed)  that  approximately 79% of
     the nitric acid production on a national
     basis would be affected by the provisions
     of  these  monitoring and reporting re-
     quirements. On the other hand, such a
     modification  reduces  the number of
     monitors  required  for compliance with
     these regulations by approximately 46%.
     (2)  At the present time, only nitric acid
     plants in  AQCR's where the Administra-
     tor  has specifically  called for  a control
     strategy for nitrogen dioxide will be can-
     didates for continuous emission monitor-
     ing  requirements  for  the  reasons  men-
     tioned previously. In the 2 AQCR's where
     such a control strategy has be«n called
     for.  there is only one known nitric acid
     plant and that is reported to be less than
     300  tons  per day production capacity—
     hence no  nitric arid plants at the present
     time will  be affected by these monitoring
     requirements.
      Similarly, evaluations of sulfuric acid
     plnnts and catalytic cracking catalyst re-
     generators  at  petroleum  refineries re-
     sulted  in  the  conclusion  that minimum
     size limitations of 300 tons per day pro-
     duction rate at sulfuric acid plants, and
     20.000  barrels per day of fresh feed to
     any catalytic cracking unit at petroleum
     refineries  could  be  reasonably estab-
     lished. Such modifications exempt ap-
     proximately 37%  and 39" respectively
     of such plants on a national basis  from
     these emission monitoring  and reporting
     reouirements.  while allowing about 9%
     of the sulfur dioxide emissions from sul-
     furic acid plants and 12% of the par-
     ticulate matter emissions from catalytic
     cracking  units to  be emitted to the at-
     mosphere  without being  measured and
     reported.  (2)  The  Agency believe that
     such modifications  provide a reasonable
     balance  between  the  costs associated
     with emission  monitoring and reporting,
     and  the need to obtain such information.
      A  number of commentors  suggested
     that sources be exempt from  the pro-
     posed emission monitoring regulations If
     .«uch sources are located within  areas of
     the  nation that  are  already attaining
     national   standards.  The  Administrator
     does not believe that such an approach
     would be  consistent  with  Section 110 of
     the  Clean Air Act, which  requires con-
     tinued maintenance of ambient stand-
     ards after attainment. In many  areas.
     the  standards  are  being attained  only
     through   effective   implementation  of
     emission limitations. Under the Clean Air
     Act. continued compliance with  emis-
    sion limitations In these areas is just as
     important as compliance in areas which
    have not  attained the standards.
      Another major comment concerned
     the  proposed  data   reporting  require-
    ments. Thirty-four (34) commentors ex-
     pressed concern at the amount of  data
    which the proposed regulations required
     to be recorded, summarized, and submit-
                                  ROflAl UCISTH, VOL 40, NO. 1f4	MONDAY, OCTOIEI t. 1975
                                                               11-153
    

    -------
                                                   RULES AND  REGULATIONS
      ted  to the State.  It was  generally indi-
      cated by the rommentors that the data
      reporting requirements  were excessive.
      Commentors questioned  the purpose of
      reporting all measured dats while sonic
      State agencies  indicated they have lim-
      ited  resources  to handle  such  informa-
      tion. EPA believes  that, in some cases.
      the  commentors misconstrued  the data
      reporting  reouirements   for  existing
      sourresTIn light of each  of these com-
      ments, the final regulations, with respect
      to the Snta reporting  requirements for
      (aseous  pollutants and   opacity,  have
      been modified.
       For  gaseous  emissions, the proposed
      regulations required the reporting of all
      one-hour averages  obtained by the emis-
      sion  monitor. Because  of  the comments
      on this provision, the Agency has reex-
      amined the  proposed data reporting re-
      quirements.  As  a result, the Agency has
      determined  that only information con-
      cerning emissions in excess of  emission
      limitations of the applicable plan is nec-
      essary  to satisfy the intent of these reg-
      ulations. Therefore, the data  reporting
      requirements  for   gaseous  pollutants
      have been modified. The final regulations
      require that States adopt procedures that
      would  require sources  to  report to the
      State on emission levels in excess  of the
      applicable emission limitations  'i.e., ex-
      cess  emissions!  for the time period spec-
      ified  in the regulation with  which com-
      pliance is determined  In other words, If
      an applicable  emission  limitation re-
      quired no more than 1.0 pounds per .hour
     SO, to be emitted for any two-hour aver-
     aging period, the data to be reported by
     the source should identify  the emission
     level  (i.e., emissions stated in pounds per
     hour) averaged over  a two-hour time
     period,  for periods only when this  emis-
     sion level was in excess, of the 1.0 pounds
     per hour emission limitation. Further,
     sources shall  be required  to maintain a
     record of all continuous monitoring ob-
     servations for gaseous  pollutants  'and
     opacity measurements) for  a period of
     two years and to make such data  avail-
     able to  the State upon request. The final
     regulations have also been amended to
     add a provision  to require sources  to re-
     port to the State on the apparent reason
     tor all noted violations of applicable reg-
     ulations.
      The proposed  data  reporting require-
     ments for opacity have also been modi-
     led. Upon reconsideration  of the extent
     of the data needed  to satisfy the intent
     of these  regulations, it  is the Adminis-
     trator's judgment that for opacity States
     must  obtain  excess  emission measure-
     ments during each hour  of operation.
     However,  before   determining  excess
     emissions, the number of  minutes  gen-
     erally  exempted  by  State  opacity  regu-
     lations should  be  considered.  For ex-
     ample, where a regulation allows two
     minutes  of  opacity measurements  in
    excess  of  the  standard,   the   State
     need  only  require  the  source  to  re-
     port all  opacity measurements in excess
     of the standard during any one  hour,
     minus the  two-minute  exemption. The
    excess measurements  shall  be  reported
    In actual per cent opacity  averaged for
      one clock minute or such other time pe-
      riod deemed appropriate by the  State.
      Averages  may  be calculated  either  by
      arithmetically averaging a minimum of
      4 equally spaced data points per minute
      or by integration of the monitor output
       Some  commentors  raised  questions
     concerning the provisions in the proposed
      regulations which allow  the use of fuel
     analysis for computing emissions of sul-
     fur dioxide  in lieu of Installing a con-
     tinuous monitoring device  for  this pol-
     lutant. Of primary concern with the fuel
     analysis  approach  among  the  com-
     mentors -was the frequency of the analy-
     sis to determine the sulfur content  of the
     fuel. However,  upon  Inspection of  the
     comments by  the Agency,  a more sig-
     nificant issue has been uncovered. The
     issue involves the determination of what
     constitutes excess emissions when a fuel
     analysis is used as the method to measure
     source emissions. For example, the sulfur
     content varies significantly within a load
     of coal,  i.e.,  while the  average  sulfur
     content of  a  total load of  coal may be
     within  acceptable limits in  relation to a
     control  regulation  which restricts the
     sulfur content of coal, it is probable that
     portions of the coal  may have  a sulfur
     content above the allowable level. Simi-
     larly, when fuel oils of different specific
     gravities  are stored  within a  common
     tank, such fuel oils tend  to stratify and
     may  not  be  a  homogeneous   mixture.
     Thus, at times, fuel oil in excess of allow-
     able limits may be combusted. The  ques-
     tion which arises is whether the combus-
     tion of this higher sulfur coal or oil is a
     violation of an applicable sulfur content
     regulation.  Initial investigations of this
     issue have  indicated a relative lack of
     specificity on the subject.
       The Agency is confronted with this
     problem not only in relation to specifying
     procedures for the emission reporting re-
     quirements for existing sources  but also
     in relation to enforcement considerations
     for new sources affected by New Source
     Performance Standards. At this time, a
     more thorough investigation of the situ-
     ation in necessary prior to promulgation
     of procedures dealing  with fuel  analysis
     for both oil and coal.  At the conclusion
     of this investigation, the Agency will set
     forth its findings and provide  guidance
     to State and local control  agencies  on
     this issue. In the meantime, the portion
     of the proposed regulations dealing with
     fuel analysis is being withheld from pro-
     mulgation at this time. As such, States
     shall not be required to adopt provisions
     dealing with emission monitoring or re-
     porting of sulfur  dioxide emissions  from
     those sources  where  the  SUtes  may
     choose to  allow the option of fuel anal-
     ysis as an alternative 'to sulfur dioxide
     monitoring.  However,  since  the  fuel
     analysis alternative may not be utilized
     by a source  that has installed sulfur di-
     oxide  control  equipment  (scrubbers),
     States shall set forth legally enforceable
     procedures which require emission moni-
    tors on such sources, where these emis-
    sion monitoring  regulations  otherwise
     require their installation.
      Other Modifications  to Proposed  Reg-
    ulations. In  addition  to reducing the
    number of monitors required under the
     proposed regulations, a number of modi-
     fications to  various  procedures  In  the
     proposed  regulations  have  been con-
     sidered and  are included in the final
     regulations. One modification which  has
     been made is the deletion of the require-
     ment to install  continuous monitors at
     "the most  representative"  location. The
     final regulations require the placement
     of an'emission monitor at "a representa-
     tive" location in the exhaust  gas system.
     In many cases "the most representative"
     location may be difficult  to  locate and
     may be inaccessible without new plat-
     forms, ladders, etc., being installed. Fur-
     ther, other representative  locations can
     provide adequate information on pollut-
     ant emissions if minimum criteria  for
     selection of monitoring locations are  ob-
     served. Guidance in determining a repre-
     sentative sampling' location is contained
     within  the  Performance   Specification
     for each pollutant monitor in the emis-
     sion monitoring regulations  for New
     Source Performance Standards  (Appen-
     dix B,  Part 60 of this Chapter). While
     these   criteria  are  designed for new
     sources, they are also useful in  deter-
     mining  representative  locations for ex-
     isting sources.
       A further modification to the proposed
     regulation is the deletion of the require-
     ment for new performance tests when
     continuous  emission monitoring equip-
     ment is modified or repaired. As pro-
     posed,  the  regulation  would have  re-
     quired a new performance test whenever
     any part  of the  continuous emission
     monitoring  system  was replaced.  This
     requirement was originally  incorporated
     in  the  regulations  to assure  the use of
     a  well-calibrated, finely tuned monitor.
     Commentors  pointed  out  that  the  re-
     quirement of conducting new perform-
     ance tests whenever any part of an in-
     strument is changed or replaced is costly
     and in  many cases not required. Upon
     evaluation of this comment, the Admin-
     istrator  concurs  that performance tests
     are not required  after each  repair or re-
     placement to the  system.  Appropriate
     changes have been made to the regula-
     tions to delete the requirements for new
     performance  tests.  However, the final
     regulations  require the reporting of the
     various  repairs   made  to  the emission
     monitoring  system  durlne  each quarter
     to  the  State. Further, the State must
     have nrocedures to require sources to re-
     port to  the State  on  a quarterly basis in-
     formation on the  amount of time and the
     reason why the continuous  monitor was
     not in  operation. Also the State must
     have legnlly  enforceable  procedures  to
     reouire  a source  to conduct a new per-
     formance test whenever, on the basis of
     available information, the  State deems
    su<-h tost is necessary.
      Thr time  period proposed for  the in-
    sUIlntion of  the reouired monitorine
    system,  i.e.. one vcar after plan apnroval.
    wns thoucht bv 21 commentors to be too
    brief, nrimarilv berause of lack of avail-
    able instruments,  the lack of trained ner-
    sormpl and the time  available for instal-
    lation of the reouired monitor*. Eouip-
    mcnt supoliers were contacted  by the
    Aeencv  and  thev confirmed the avail-
    ability  of emission  monitors. However.
                                  HOUAl  KOISTH, VOl.  40, NO. 1»«—MONDAY, OCTOift 4,  1»TS
                                                             11-154
    

    -------
                                                 HULES AND REGULATIONS
     the Administrator has  determined that
     the time necessary for  purchase, instal-
     lation and performance testinc of such
     monitors  n;a\  require  more  than  one
     year for certain installations, especially
     where gaseous monitors arc required. In
     order to provide sources with ample time.
     the Agency has modified the final regula-
     tions to allow States to  adopt procedures
     that will provide sources 18 months after
     the approval or promulgation  of the re-
     vised SIP to  satisfy the installation and
     performance testing  procedures required
     by these continuous monitorinc regula-
     tions. A-provision is  also included  to al-
     low, on a case-by-case  basis,  additional
     extensions for source? where pood faith
     efforts have been undertaken to purchase
     and  install  equipment,  but where such
     installation  cannot  be   accomplished
     within  the time period  prescribed  by
     the regulations.
      A  number  of State and local acencies
     also commented on the  lack of time pro-
     vided sources to install  the monitors re-
     quired  by  the  proposed  regulations.
     These acencies also  indicated that they
     must Acquire sufficient skilled manpower
     to implement the regulations, such  as
     personnel to provide guidance to sources.
     to  monitor  performance  tests  and  to
     analyze the emission data that are to be
     submitted by the sources. Further, some
     State agencies indicated that more than
     six months was needed to develop  the
     necessary  plan revisions. Most  State
     agencies who commented stated that one
     year should be provided to allow States
     to revise their SIP'S  The Administrator
     is aware of the various priorities which
     confront State and local agencies at this
     time 'e.g . compliance schedules, enforce-
     ment actions, litigation proceedings, re-
     evaluation of adequacy of  SIP's to attain
     and  maintain national  standards, etc.'
     and, as such, believes that a six-month
     postponement in  the submittal  of plan
     revisions to require emission monitoring
     and  reporting is  justified  and prudent.
     Hence, States must submit plan revisions
     to satisfy the requirement? of  this sec-
     tion  within one year of promuleation of
     these regulations in  the FEDERAL REGIS-
     TER.  However.  States are advised  that
     such  plan  revisions  may be  submitted
     any time prior to the final date, and are
     encouraged to do so where possible.
      The proposed regulations provided the
     States with the option of allowing sources
     to continue to  use emission monitoring
     equipment that does not meet perform-
     ance specifications set forth in the  regu-
     lations for up to five years from the date
     of approval of  the State  regulations or
     EPA  promulgation.  Some commenters
     asked  that  this provision be  extended
     indefinitely. In some cases they indicated
     they had recently  purchased  and had
     already  installed  monitoring systems
     which  were only marginally away from
    meeting the applicable performance spec-
     ifications.  The  Agency believes,  how-
     ever, that such a modification to the pro-
     posed regulations should not be allowed.
     It is believed  that such a provision  would
     result  in inadequate  monitoring systems
     being maintained after their useful life
     has ended. Though some monitoring sys-
    tems will probably last longer than five
    years, it is believed that this time period
    will provide adequate  time to  amortize
    the cost  of such equipment.  In  ca^es
    where  existing  emission monitors  arc
    known  not  to  provide  reasonable esti-
    mates  of emissions.  States should con-
    sider more stringent procedures to pro-
    vide a more speedy  retirement  of such
    emission monitoring  systems.
      Some commentors raised the question
    of  whether existing  oxygen monitors
    which  are installed in most  fossil fuel-
    fired steam generating boilers to monitor
    excess  oxygen  for the  purposes of com-
    bustion control could be used to satisfy
    the requirement  for  monitoring oxygen
    under  the proposal. Upon investigation,
    it  has been determined that,  in  some
    cases, such oxygen monitors may be used
    provided that  they are located  so that
    there  is no influx of dilution air between
    the oxygen monitor and the  continuous
    pollutant monitor. In some cases, it may
    be  possible  to  install  the continuous
    monitoring device at the same location
    as  the  existing  oxygen monitor.  Care
    should be taken, however, to assure that
    a representative sample is obtained  Be-
    cause of  the  various  possibilities that
    may arise concerning  the usefulness  of
    existing  oxygen  monitors,  the State
    should determine, after a case-by-case
    review, the acceptability of existing oxy-
    gen monitors.
      Another technical  issue  which  was
    raised  suggested  that  continuous emis-
    sion  monitors  which   provide  direct
    measurements of pollutants in units com-
    parable to the emission limitations and
    other devices not i-pecifically identified
    in the  proposed  regulations are avail-
    able for purchase and installation. The
    Agency is aware that  various monitor-
    ing systems  exist but has not as yet  de-
    termined specific performance specifica-
    tions for these  monitoring systems that
    are directly  applicable  to  the  source
    categories covered by these regulations.
    However,  it  is not EPA's intent  to deny
    the use of any  equipment that can  be
    demonstrated to be reliable and accurate.
    If monitors can be demonstrated to pro-
    vide the same relative degree of accuracy
    and durability  as provided  by  the per-
    formance specifications  in Appendix B
    of Part 60.  they shall generally be  ac-
    ceptable to  satisfy the requirements of
    these  regulations under Section 3.9  of
    Appendix P. Further, where  alternative
    procedures  (e.g..  alternate  procedures
    for conversion of data to units  of appli-
    cable  regulations) can be shown by  the
    State  to be equivalent  to the procedures
    set forth in  Appendix P of these regula-
    tions,  then  such alternate  procedures
    may be submitted by the State for  ap-
    proval by EPA. Section 3.9 of Appendix P
    identifies  certain examples where alter-
    native emission  monitoring  systems  or
    alternative procedures will generally be
    considered by  the Agency for approval.
      It should  be  noted that some sources
    may be unable  to comply with the regu-
    lations  because  of technical difficulties,
    (e.g..  the presence  of condensed water
    vapor in the flue gas), physical limita-
    tions of accessibility at the plant facility,
    or.  in  other  cases, because of extreme
    economic  hardship.  States should use
    their  judgment  in implementing  these
    requirements in such cases. Section 6  of
    Appendix P of this Part provides various
    examples where  the installation of con-
    tinuous emission monitors would not  be
    feasible or  reasonable.  In such  cases
    alternate emission monitoring  (and re-
    porting1 by more routine methods, such
    as  manual stack  testing,  must be re-
    quired. States in preparing their revised
    SIP must set forth and  describe the cri-
    teria they will use to identify such un-
    usual cases, and  must  further describe
    the alternative procedures they will im-
    plement to otherwise satisfy the intent  of
    these regulations. States are advised that
    this provision is intended for unusual
    cases, and. as such, should not be widely
    applied.
      It was  pointed out  by  some  com-
    mentors  that  carbon dioxide  monitors
    could probably be used in lieu of oxygen
    monitors to provide information to con-
    vert emission  data to the units of the
    applicable  State  regulation   Detailed
    discussion of  the  technical merits and
    limitations of  this approach is discussed
    in the  Preamble to the  Part 60 Regula-
    tions. As pointed out. in that Preamble.
    such monitors may be  used in certain
    situations. Modifications have therefore
    been made to  the Part 51 regulations  to
    allow the use of such monitors which in-
    clude references  to technical specifica-
    tions contained in Part 60 for carbon di-
    oxide monitors. Also, the cycling time for
    oxygen monitors has been changed from
    one hour to  15 minutes  to correspond  to
    the specification in Part 60. The differ-
    ence between  cycling times in  the two
    proposals was an oversight. The cycling
    time  for carbon dioxide monitors will
    also be 15 minutes as in Part 60.
      A number of other miscellaneous tech-
    nical comments were also received.  Corn-
    mentors indicated that the proposed ex-
    emption for  opacity monitoring require-
    ments  that may be granted to oil-fired
    and gas-fired steam  generators should
    also apply to units burning a combina-
    tion of these  fuels. The Administrator
    concurs with this r.uggestion and an ex-
    emption for such sources burning oil and
    pas has ben provided in the final  regu-
    lations subject, to  the same restrictions
    as  are  imposed  on   oil-fired  steam
    generators.
      As  previously indicated,  the regula-
    tions  for emission monitoring for  exist-
    ing sources  refer in many cases to the
    specific performance specifications  set
    forth in the  emission monitoring regula-
    tions for new sources affected by Part 60.
    Many  of the comments received on the
    proposed recxilations in effect pointed to
    issues affecting both proposals. In  many
    cases, more  specific technical issues are
    discussed in the Preamble to the Part  60
    Regulations  and as  such  the  reader is
    referred  to  that  Preamble. Specifically,
    the Part 60  Preamble addresses the fol-
    lowing topics: data handling and report-
    ing techniques; requirements for report-
    ing repairs and replacement parts used;
    location  of   monitoring  instruments:
    changes to span requirements, operating
                                  KDftAl UGISTH, VOL. 40, NO.  1»«	MONDAY, OCTO»» *.
                                                                  11-155
    

    -------
                                                   RULES  AND  REGULATIONS
     frequency requirements, sulfuric ncid and
     nitric  arid  plant  conversion  factors;
     and, for opacity monitoring equipment.
     changes in the cycling time and in alipn-
     mcnt  procedures.  The  reader  is  cau-
     tioned, however, that specific reference
     to regulations  in  the  Part 60 Preamble
     Is strictly to federal New Source Perform-
     ance Regulations rather than State and
     local control  agency  regulations  which
     affect existing sources and which are part
     of an applicable plan.
       In addition  to  the many technical
     comments  received, a numher of  legal
     issues tt'ere raised  Several commentors
     questioned EPA's statutory authority to
     promulgate these regulations and pointed
     out other alleged legal defects in the pro-
     posal. The Administrator has considered
     these comments, and has found them un-
     persuasive.
       One  commentor  argued that  new 40
     CFR 51.19(e)  will require "revisions" to
     existing state plans; that-'revisions" may
     be called for under Section 110
     of the Clean Air Act only where EPA has
     found  that there are "improved or more
     expeditious methods" for achieving am-
     bient standards or that  a state plan is
     "substantially inadequate" to achieve the
     standards: that the  new  regulation Is
     based upon neither of these findings; and
     that therefore  there is no statutory au-
     thority  for  the regulation. This  argu-
     ment fails to take cognir.ance of Section
     110(a) (2) (F) (ii) of the Act. which man-
     dates that all state implementation plans
     contain  self-monitoring  requirements.
     The fact that  EPA originally accepted
     plans  without  these  requirements  be-
     cause of substantial uncertainty as to the
     reliability of self-monitoring equipment
     does  not  negate  the  mandate  of  the
     statute.
       In essence, new 5 51.19(e) does not call
     for "revisions" as  contemplated by the
     Act. but for supplements to the original
     plans to make them complete.  At  any
     rate, it  is the  Administrator's Judgment
     that the new  self-monitoring  require-
     ments will result in a "more expeditious"
     achievement of the ambient standards.
     Since these requirements  are  valuable
     enforcement tools and Indicators of mal-
     functions, they should  lead to a net de-
     crease in emissions.
      Other commentors argued that even if
     EPA has statutory  authority to require
     self-monitoring. It  has no authority to
     impose  specific minimum  requirements
     for state plans, to require  "continuous"
     monitoring, or  to require monitoring of
     oxygen, which is not a pollutant. These
     comments fail  to consider that  a basic
     precept  of administrative law is that an
     agency may fill in the broad directives of
     legislation  with precise  regulatory re-
     quirements.  More  specifically,  the  Ad-
     ministrator has authority under Section
     30Ha)  of the Clean Air  Act to promul-
     gate "such  regulations as are necessary
     to carry out his functions under the Act".
     Courts have long upheld the authority of
     agencies to promulgate more specific re-
    quirements than are set forth  in  en-
    abling legislation, so long as the require-
     ments are reasonably related to the pur-
     poses of the legislation. Since the Act
     requires self-monitoring without further
     guidance. EPA surely has the authority
     to set specific  requirements in  order  to
     carry out its function of assuring that the
     Act is properly implemented.
      In EPA's judqnicnt. the  requirements
     set forth in  5 51.19'e)  are  necessary  to
     assure that each state's self-monitoring
     program Is sufficient to comply with the
     Act's mandate. The fact that oxygen and
     carbon  dioxide are  not  air  pollutants
     controlled  under the Act is  legally  ir-
     relevant, since in EPA's judgment, they
     must  be monitored  in order  to convert
     measured emission data to units of emis-
     sion standards
      Other commentors have  argued that
     the self-monitoring requirements violate
     the protection against self-incrimination
     provided in the Fifth Amendment to the
     U.S. Constitution, and that  the informa-
     tion obtained from the monitoring is so
     unreliable as to be Invalid  evidence for
     use in court.
      There are  two reasons why the self-
     incrimination argument is invalid First.
     the self-incrimination privilege does not
     apply to corporations, and it is probable
     that a great majority of the sources cov-
     ered by these requirements will be owned
     by corporations.  Secondly,  courts  have
     continually  recognized  an  exception to
     the privilege  for "records  required  by
     law",  such as  the  self-monitoring and
     reporting procedures which  are required
     by the Clean Air Act. As  to the validity
     of evidence  issue, in  EPA's  opinion, the
     required performance specifications will
     assure  that  self-monitoring  equipment
     will be sufficiently reliable to withstand
     attacks in court.
      Finally,  some  comments   reflected  a
     misunderstanding  of  EPA's  suggestion
     that states explore with counsel ways to
     draft their regulations so as  to automati-
     cally  incorporate  by reference  future
    additions to  Appendix P  and avoid the
     time-consuming plan revision  process.
     (EPA  pointed out that public participa-
    tion would still be assured,  since EPA's
     proposed revisions to Appendix P  would
     always be subject to public  comment on
     a nation-wide basis.)
      EPA's  purpose was merely  to suggest
    an approach that a  state may  wish to
    follow  if  the approach would be  legal
    under  that  state's  law.  EPA offers no
    opinion  as  to  whether  any  state law
     would allow this. Such a determination
     is up to the individual states.
      Summary of Revisions  and Clarifica-
     tions   to  the   Proposed   Regulations.
    Briefly,  the revisions and clarifications to
    the proposed regulations  include:
      (1) A  clarification to indicate that con-
     tinuous  emission monitors  are  not re-
    quired  for sources  unless such  sources
    are subject to an  applicable emission
     limitation of an approved SIP.
      (2)   A  revision  to require emission
     monitors for oxides  of nitrogen in only
     those  AQCR's where the  Administrator
    has  specifically  called  for  a  control
    strategy for nitrogen dioxide.
      (3) A revision to include a  general pro-
     vision to exempt any source that clearly
     demonstrates that it will cease operation
     within fivp years of the inclusion of moni-
     toring  requirements for the source  in
     Appendix P.
       MI Revisions to exrmpt smaller-sized
     sources  and infrequently  used  sources
     within the specified source categories
       15i  A revision  to the data  reporting
     requirements to-require the submittal by
     the source of the State, emission data in
     excess of the applicable emission limita-
     tion for both opacity  and  gaseous pol-
     lutants, rather than all measured data, as
     proposed A provision has been added to
     require information on the cause of all
    noted violations of applicable regulations.
       <6> A clarification to indicate  that the
    continuous monitoring of oxygen is not
    required unless the continuous  monitor-
    ing of  sulfur dioxide and/or  nitrogen
    oxides emissions is required by the appli-
    cable SIP.
       (7) A  revision to allow the placement
    of continuous emission monitors at "a
    representative location"  on  the  exhaust
    gas system rather  than  at "the most
    representative location"  as  required by
    the proposed regulations.
       <8>  A  revision  to delete the  require-
    ments of  new performance tests each
    time  the continuous monitoring equip-
    ment is repaired or modified. However, a
    new provision is included to require that
    a report of all repairs and  maintenance
    performed during the quarter shall be re-
    ported by the source to the State.
       (9>  A modification to provide sources
    18 months rather than  one year after
    approval or promulgation of the revised
    SIP to comply with the continuous moni-
    toring regulations adopted by the States.
      (10) A modification to provide States
    one year, rather  than the  six  months
    after  the promulgation of these regula-
    tions  in the FEDERAL REGISTER to submit
    plan revisions to satisfy the requirements
    promulgated herein.
      Requirements of States. States shall be
    required  to  revise  their SIP's by Octo-
    ber 6, 1976  to include legally enforceable
    procedures  to require emission monitor-
    ing, recording and reporting, as  a mini-
    mum  for those sources specified in the
    regulations  promulgated herein. While
    minimum requirements have been estab-
    lished, States may,  as they  deem appro-
    priate, expand these requirements.
      The regulations  promulgated  herein
    have been revised in light of the various
    comments to generally  provide  a more
    limited introduction into  this new meth-
    odology.  Cooperation  among   affected
    parties, i.e., State and local control agen-
    cies, sources, instrument manufacturers
    and suppliers, and this Agency  is neces-
    sary  to  move successfully  forward in
    these  areas  of emission monitoring and
    reporting prescribed in  the Clean Air
    Act. Assistance can be obtained  from the
    EPA Regional Offices in  relation to the
    technical and procedural aspects of these
    regulations.
      Copies of documents referenced'in this
    Preamble are available for public inspec-
    tion at the  EPA Freedom of Information
    Center, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington,
    D.C.  20460. The  Agency  has not  pre-
    pared an environmental impact state-
    ment  for these  regulations since they
                                  KDUAl KGISTEt, VOL 40, MO.  1*4	MONDAY, OCTOtEI t, 1*75
                                                            11-156
    

    -------
                                                    RULES AND REGULATIONS
    were proposed (September 11, 1974 > prior
    to the effective date for requirmc volun-
    tary  environmental Impact statements
    on  ETA'<; regulatory actions (see 39 FR
    16186, May 7,  1974).
      The  regulations  set  forth below  are
    promulgated under the  authority of sec-
    tions 110 (2> (FMin-Ull)  and 301<2HF>.  1857g
    <») 1 and are effective November 5, 1975.
      Dated: September 23. 1975.
                         JOHN QUAFITS.
                     Acting  Xdminisirotor.
      ;. Jenkins. R E .  Strategies and Air Stand-
    ards  Division.  OAQPS. EPA. Memo  to R  L.
    AJax. Emission Standards  and Engineering
    Division. OAQPS. EPA. Emission Monitoring
    Costs February 3T, 1975
      2. Young. D. E.. Control Programs Develop-
    ment Division, OAQPS. EPA  Memo to E. J.
    Ullls, Control  Programs Development  Dl-
    Ylslon. OAQPS, EPA, Emission  Source  Data
    for In-Slack Monitoring Regulations. June 4,
    1975.
       1.  Section 51.1  is amended by adding
    paragraphs (z>, (aa) , (bb) , (cc),  (dd).
    and  (ee) as follows:
    
    § 51.1   Dcfmilion!i.
       (z) "Emission standard" means a reg-
    ulation (or portion thereof) setting forth
    an allowable rate of emissions,  level of
    opacity, or prescribing equipment or fuel
    specifications  that  result  in  control of
    air pollution emissions.
         "Capacity  factor"  means   the
    ratio of the average load on a machine or
    equipment for the period of time consid-
    ered  to the  capacity rating of  the  ma-
    chine or equipment.
       (bb)  "Excess emissions" means emis-
    sions of an air pollutant in excess of an
    emission standard.
       (cc) "Nitric acid plant" means any fa-
    cility producing nitric  acid 30 to 70  per-
    cent in strength by either the pressure or
    atmospheric pressure process.
       (dd)  "Sulfuric acid plant" means any
    facility  producing sulfurlc acid by  the
    contact process by burning elemental sul-
    fur, alkylation acid, hydrogen sulfide, or
    acid sludge,  but does not include facili-
    ties where conversion  to sulfuric acid is
    utilized  primarily as a means of prevent-
    ing emissions to the atmosphere of sul-
    fur dioxide or other sulfur compounds.
       (ee)  "Fossil  fuel-fired  steam gener-
    ator" means a furnace or boiler  used in
    the process of burning fossil fuel for the
    primary purpose of producing steam by
    heat transfer.
      2. Section  51.19 is amended by adding
    paragraph (e)  as follows:
    
    I 51.19   Source •urvrillanrr.
       (e) Legally enforceable procedures to
     require  stationary  sources  subject  to
     tenlislon standards  as  part  of an appli-
     cable plan to install, calibrate, maintain,
     and operate equipment for continuously
     toonltoring and recording emissions; and
     to provide other information as specified
     to Appendix P of this part.
       (1) Such procedures shall identify the
    types of sources, by source category and
    capacity, that must install  such instru-
    ments, and shall identify for each source
    category  the pollutants which must  be
    monitored.
       (2) Such procedures  shall, as a  mini-
    mum,  require the  types  of sources set
    forth in Appendix P of this part (as such
    appendix may be amended from time to
    time)  to  meet  the applicable require-
    ments set forth therein.
       (3) Such procedures shall contain pro-
    visions  which require the owner or op-
    erator of each source subject to continu-
    ous  emission monitoring  and  recording
    requirements to maintain  a file of all
    pertinent information. Such information
    shall include  emission  measurements.
    continuous monitoring  system perform-
    ance testing measurements,  performance
    evaluations, calibration checks, and ad-
    justments and maintenance performed
    on such monitoring systems and other re-
    ports and records required  by Appendix
    P of this Part for at least two years fol-
    lowing the date of such measurements or
    maintenance.
       (4) Such procedures  shall require the
    source owner or operator to submit  in-
    formation  relating  to  emissions  and
    operation of the emission monitors to the
    State to the extent described in Appendix
    P as frequently or more frequently  as
    described therein.
       (5> Such procedures shall provide that
    sources subject to  the  requirements  of
    5 51.19(e) (2>  of this  section shall have
    installed  all  necessary  equipment and
    shall have begun monitoring and record-
    ing within 18 months of  <1>  the approval
    of a State plan requiring monitoring  for
    that source or  (2) promulgation by the
    Agency of monitoring requirements  for
    that source.  However, sources  that have
    ma'le good faith efforts to purchase,  in-
    stall, and  begin the monitoring  and  re-
    cording of emission  data  but who have
    been unable to complete  such  Installa-
    tion within the time period provided may
    be given reasonable extensions of time as
    deemed appropriate by  the  State.
       (6 > States shall submit revisions to the
    applicable plan which  implement the
    provisions of this section  by October 6,
    1976.
       3. In Part 51, Appendix P is added  as
    follows:
    APPENDIX P—MINIMUM EMISSION MONITORING
                  RtQtnUEMENTS
    
      1.0 Purpose. This Appendix  P  sets forth
    the minimum  requirements for continuous
    emission monitoring and recording that each
    State Implementation  Plan must  Include In
    order to be .\pproved under the  provisions of
    40 CFR 51 10(e) These requirements Include
    the source categories to be affected; emission
    monitoring,  recording, and  reporting  re-
    quirements lor these  sources;  performance
    specifications for  accuracy, reliability, and
    durability of acceptable monitoring systems;
    and techniques to convert emission data to
    units of the applicable Stntc emission stand-
    ard Such data must be reported to the State
    as an  Indication of whether proper mainte-
    nance and operating  procedures  arc  betYig
    utilized by  nourci-  operators  to maintain
    emission  levels at or below emission  stand-
    ards. Such data may be used directly or In-
    directly for compliance determination or any
    other purpose deemed appropriate  by the
    Stale Though the monitoring requirements
    are specified In detail. States are given some
    flexibility  to resolve  difficulties  that may
    arise  during the Implementation of  these
    regulations.
      1.1  Applicability.
      The State plan ihull require the owner or
    operator of MI emf*slon source In a category
    listed In this Appendix to:  (1) Install, cali-
    brate, operate, and maintain all monitoring
    equipment necessary for continuously moni-
    toring the pollutants specified In this Ap-
    pendix  for the  applicable source category;
    and (2) complete the Installation and per-
    formance  tests of such equipment and  begin
    monitoring and  recording within  18  months
    of plan approval  or promulgation. The source
    categories  and the respective monitoring re-
    quirements are listed below.
      1.1.1 Fossil fuel-fired steam generators, as
    specified In  paragraph 2.1 of this  appendix.
    shall  be  monitored  for  opacity, nitrogen
    oxides emissions, sulfur  dioxide  emissions.
    and oxygen or carbon dioxide.
      1.1.2 Fluid bed catalytic  cracking  unit
    catalyst regenerators,  as  specified In  para-
    graph 2.4  of this appendix, ahall  be moni-
    tored for opacity.
      1.1.3 Sulfuric  acid  plants, as specified In
    paragraph   2.3 of  this appendix, shall  be
    monitored for sulfur dioxide emissions.
      1.1.4 Nitric  acid  plants,  as  specified  in
    paragraph  2.2 of  this appendix, shall  be
    monitored for nitrogen oxides emissions.
      1.2  Exemptions
      The States may Include provisions within
    their regulations to grant exemptions from
    the monitoring  requirements of  paragraph
    1.1 of this  appendix for any source which Is:
      1.2.1 subject to a new source performance
    standard promulgated In 40  CFR. Part  60
    pursuant  to Section 111  of the  Clean Air
    Act: or
      1.2 2 not subject to an applicable emission
    standard of an approved plan; or
      1.23  scheduled for retirement within  5
    years after Inclusion  of monitoring require-
    ments Tor  the source In Appendix P. provided
    that adequate evidence and guarantees are
    provided that  clearly show  that  the source
    will cease  operations prior to such date.
      1.3  Extensions.
      States may allow reasonable extensions of
    the time provided for Installation of monitors
    for  facilities unable to meet the  prescribed
    tlmeframe   (I.e..  18  months  from plan ap-
    proval or promulgation)  provided the owner
    or operator of such facility demonstrates that
    good faith efforts have been made to obtain
    and  Install  such devices within  such pre-
    acrlberi tlmeframe.
      1.4  Monitoring System Malfunction.
      The Stale plan may provide a  temporary
    exemption from  th* monitoring and report-
    Ing requirements of this appendix during any
    period of  monitoring system malfunction.
    provided that the source  owner or operator
    shows, to  the satisfaction of the St»te. that
    the  malfunction was  unavoidable  and It
    being repaired as  e.ipedltlously as practicable.
      20  .Minimum  Monitoring Requirement.
      States must. MS  a  minimum, require the
    sources listed In paragraph 1.1 of this appen-
    dix  to meet the following basic requirements
      2.1  Fositl furl-fired iteam generators.
      Each fossil fuel-fired »tei\m generator, ex-
    cepl as  provided In the following lubpara-
    graphs, with mi unrrunj average capacity fac-
    tor  of greater than 30 percent, as reported to
    the Federal  Power Commission for calendar
    year 1D74.  or iva  otherwise demonstrated to
    the SIMe by the owner or operator, shall con-
    form with  the  following monitoring require-
    ments when such facility is  subject  to an
    emission standard of an applicable plan lor
    the pollutant in question.
                                    KMIAl UOISTEt,  VOL  40, NO.  194	MONDAY, OCTOtH  «, 1»7i
                                                                11-157
    

    -------
                                                        RULES AND  REGULATIONS
       3.1.1  A continuous monitoring system for
     the measurement of op»clty which meets the
     performance  specifications   of  paragraph
     3 I 1 of this appendix shall be Installed, cali-
     brated, maintained,  and operated In  accord-
     ance with the procedures of this appendix bj
     the owner  or operator  of any tuch itenin
     generator of greater  than 2So' million BTU
     per hour heat input  except where:
       2.1.1.1 (aaeous fuel I* the only fuel burned.
     or
       3.1.If oil  or a mixture of gas  and oil are
     the only fuels burned and the source Is able
     to comply  with the  applicable  participate
     matter and opacity regulations without utili-
     zation  .of   paniculate  matter   collection
     •qulpme'nt. and  where the source ha* never
     been found, through  any administrative or
     Judicial proceedings, to be In violation of any
     Ttslble emission  standard of'the  applicable
     plan.
       2.1.2  A continuous monitoring system for
     the measurement  of sulfur  dioxide which
     meets the performance specifications of para-
     graph 3.1 3 of this appendix shall be Installed,
     calibrated, maintained, and operated  on  any
     fossil  fuel-fired  steam generator of  greater
     th&n 250 million BTU per hour  heat Input
     which has Installed sulfur dioxide pollutant
     control equipment.
       2.1.3_ A continuous monitoring system for
     the measurement of  nitrogen oxides which
     meets the performance specification of para-
     graph 3.1.2 of this appendix shall be Installed.
     calibrated, maintained, and operated on fos-
     •II fuel-fired  steam   generators  of   greater
     than 1000 million BTU per hour  heat Input
     when such facility Is  located In an Air Qual-
     ity Control  Region where the  Administrator
     has specifically  determined  that  a  control
     strategy for  nitrogen  dioxide  Is necessary to
     attain  the  national   standards, unless  the
     •ource  owner or  operator demonstrates dur-
     ing  source compliance tests as required  by
     the State that such a source  emits nitrogen
     oxides at levels 30 percent or more below the
     emission  standard  within  the  applicable
     plan.
       2.1 4  A continuous  monitoring system  for
     the measurement of  the percent oxygen  or
     carbon  dioxide  which  meets  the  perform-
     ance  specifications of paragraphs  3.1.4  or
     3.1 5 il this appendix shall be installed, cali-
     brated, operated, and maintained on fossil
     fuel-fired  steam  generators where  measure-
     ments of oxygen or carbon dioxide In the flue
     gis are required to convert either sulfur di-
     oxide or nitrogen oxides continuous emis-
     sion monitoring  data, or both, to units of
     the emission  standard within the applica-
     ble plan.
      2.2  Nitric afiti plants.
      Each  nitric acid plant of greater than  300
     tons per day  production capacity, the pro-
     duction capacity  being expressed as 100 per-
     cent acid, located In an Air Quality Control
     Region  where the Administrator ha.s  specif-
     ically determined that a control strategy for
     nitrogen dioxide  Is necessary  to attain the
     national standard  shall Install," calibrate.
     maintain,  and  operate a  continuous  moni-
     toring system for the  measurement of nitro-
    gen oxides  which  meets  the  performance
    *peciflc»tlons  of  paragraph  3.1.2  for each
    nitric acid producing facility within such
    plant.
    3.3 Siil/vrif and plants
      Each Sulfurtc acid  plant of greater than
    SOO tons per day production  capacity,  the
    production being expressed as 100 percent
    •cid, shall  Install,  calibrate, maintain  and
    operate  a continuous  monitoring system for
    the measurement of  sulfur  dioxide   which
    meets the performance specifications of 3 1.3
    for  each  sulfurlc  acid producing facility
    within such plant.
      24 Fluid bed catalytic cracking i/nf( cata-
    lyst regenerators  at petroleum refineries.
       Each catalyst  regenerator for  fluid bed
     catalytic cracking units of greater than 20.-
     000 barrels per day fresh fe«d capacity shall
     Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate  a
     continuous monli/orlng system  for the meas-
     urement of  opacity  which  meets the  per-
     formance specifications of 3 1.1.
       30  Minimum specifications.
       All  State plane shall require owners or op-
     erators of  monitoring equipment installed
     to comply with this Appendix, except as pro-
     vided In paragraph 3.2. to demonstrate com-
     pliance with  the following performance spec-
     ifications
       3  I Prr/ormancr specifications.
       The performance  specifications  set  forth
     In Appendix  B of Part  60 are  Incorporated
     herein by reference,  and shall  be used by
     States to determine acceptability of monitor-
     Ing  equipment  Installed pursuant  to  this
     Appendix except  that  (1) where  reference Is
     made  to the  "Administrator" in Appendix B.
     Part 60, the term "State" should be inserted
     for  the purpose  of  this Appendix  (eg, In
     Performance  Specification 1.  1.2.  "  .  . moni-
     toring systems subject  to approval  by the
     Administrator," should  be  Interpreted  as,
     ". . . monitoring systems subject  to approval
     by the State"), and  (2)  where reference  Is
     made  to the "Reference Method" In Appendix
     B. Part 60. the State-  may allow the use of
     either  the State approved reference method
     or the Federally approved reference method
     as published  In Part 60 of this  Chapter  The
     Performance  Specifications to be used with
     each  type of  monitoring system are listed
     below.
       3.1.1 Continuous monitoring  systems for
     measuring opacity shall  comply  with Per-
     formance Specification 1.
       31.2 Continuous monitoring  systems for
     measuring nitrogen oxides shall comply with
     Performance Specification 2.
       3.1.3 Continuous monitoring  systems for
     measuring sulfur dioxide shall  comply with
     Performance Specification 2.
       3.1 4 Continuous monitoring  systems for
     measuring oxygen shall comply with  Per-
     fonnnnce Specification 3
       3.1.5 Continuous  monitoring  systems for
     measuring carbon dioxide shall comply with
     Performance Specification 3.
       3.2 Exemptions
       Any source  which has  purchased an emis-
     sion monitoring system(s)  prior  to Septem-
     ber  11, 1974.  mivy be exempt from meeting
     such test procedures prescribed In Appendix
     B  of Part 60  for a period not to exceed five
     years  from  plan  approval or promulgation.
       3.3 Calibration  Gases.
      for nitrogen oxides monitoring  systems in-
     stalled  on  fossil fuel-fired steam generators
     the pollutant  gas  used  to prepare calibration
     gas mixtures  (Section  2.1, Performance Spec-
     ification 2,  Appendix  B, Part  60)  shall be
     nitric  oxide (NO). For nitrogen oxides mon-
     itoring systems. Installed on nitric acid plants
     the pollutant  gas  used  to prepare calibration
     gas mixtures (Section  2 1, Performance Spec-
     ification 2, Appendix B. Part 60 of this Chap-
     ter)  shall be  nitrogen  dloxld- (NO.). These
     gases shall also be  used  for daily checks under
     paragraph 3.7  of this appendix as applicable.
     For  sulfur dioxide monitoring systems in-
     stalled  on fossil fuel-fired st«axn generators
     or sulfurlc acid plants the pollutant pas used
     to prepare calibration gas mixtures (Section
     2.1. Performance Specification 2. Appendix B.
     Part 60 of  this Chapter) shall be sulfur di-
    oxide (SO.)  Span and zero  gases should be
    trtceible  to  NAtlnn.il  Bureau o(  Standards
    reference gases  whenever these reference
     gases are available. Every six months  from
    date  of  manufacture,  span  and  z«ro gases
     shall b« reanalyzed by conducting triplicate
     analyses using the reference methods In Ap-
     pendix  A. Part 80  of this chapter as follows:
     for sulfur dioxide, use Reference Method 6;
     for nitrogen oxides, uss Reference Method 7;
     and for carbon  dioxide or oxygen. u»e Ref-
     erence Method 3  The gases may b; analyzed
     at less frequent  Intervals if longer shelf lives
     are guaranteed  by the manufacturer
       3 4  Cycling times
       Cycling  times  Include  the  total  time  a
     monitoring   »ysl*m  requires   to  sample.
     analyze and record an emisMon measurement
       3.4.1 Continuous monitoring  systems for
     measuring  opacity shall  complete a  mini-
     mum  of  one cycle of operation (sampling.
     analyzing, and data recording)  for each suc-
     cessive 10-second period
       3.4 2 Continuous monitoring  systems for
     measuring oxides  of nitrogen,  carbon diox-
     ide, oxygen, or sulfur dioxide shall  complete
     a minimum of one cycle of operation  (sam-
     pling,  analyzing,  and  data  recording)  for
     each successive 15-mlnute period.
       3.5  Monitor location.
       State  plans shall  require  all continuous
     monitoring systems or  monitoring  devices to
     be Installed such  that representative meas-
     urements of emissions or process parameters
     (I e., oxygen, or carbon  dioxide) Irom the af-
     fected facility are obtained. Additional guid-
     ance for location of continuous monitoring
     systems to obtain representative samples are
     contained  In  the  applicable  Performance
     Specifications of Appendix B of Part 6O of
     this Chapter.
       3.6 Combined effluents
       When the effluents from two or  more af-
     fected  facilities of similar design and operat-
     ing characteristics are combined before being
     released to  the atmosphere, the State  plan
     may allow monitoring systems to be installed
     on the combined effluent. When  the affected
     facilities are not of  similar design and operat-
     ing characteristics, or when the effluent from
     one affected facility Is released to the atmos-
     phere  through more than one point, the State
     should establish  alternate  procedures  to Im-
     plement the Intent of these requirements.
       3 7  Zero and drift.
       State plans  shall require  owners  or  opera-
     tors of all  continuous monitoring systems
     Installed  In  accordance with  the  require-
     ments  of this Appendix to record the 7*ro and
     span drift  In  accordance  with  the method
     prescribed by  the manufacturer of such  In-
     struments: to  subject the Instruments to the
     manufacturer's recommended  zero  and span
     check  at least once dally unless the manu-
     facturer has  recommended adjustments at
     shorter Intervals. In which case  such recom-
     mendations shall be followed:  to adjust the
     zero and  span whenever  the  24-hour  zero
     drift or 24-hour calibration drift  limits of
     the applicable performance specifications in
    Appendix B of Part 60  are exceeded, and to
     adjust continuous monitoring svstems refer-
    enced  by paragraph 3.2  of this  Appendix
     whenever  the  24-hour zero drift or 24-hour
    calibration drift  exceed 10 percent of the
    emission standard.
      3.8 Spin.
      Instrument  span  should  be approximately
     200 per cent of the  expected Instrument data
    dlsplnv output corresponding to the  emission
    standard for the  source
      39 Alternative   procedures  and   require-
    ments.
      In cases where States wish to utilize differ-
     ent, but equivalent, procedures  and require-
     ments  for  continuous  monitoring  systems.
     the State plan must provide a description of
    such alternative  proreduers for approval by
     the Administrator  Some examples of "Situa-
     tions  that  may require  alternatives follow:
      3.9 1  Alternative  monitoring requirements
     to accommodate continuous monitoring sys-
     tems that require corrections for stack mois-
     ture conditions leg., an Instrument measur-
    ing si earn generator SO emissions on a wet
     basis could be used with an Instrument mea-
    suring oxvgen concentration on  a  dry basis
     if  acceptable  methods of  measuring  stick
    moisture conditions  are used to allow  »c-
                                              M«IJT«, VOl.  40,  NO  194	MONDAY,  OCTO4EI *,
                                                                    11-158
    

    -------
                                                      RULES AND  REGULATIONS
    curate adjustment of the measured SO. con-
    centration to dry basis )
      39.2  Alternative  locations lor Instilling
    con'.ir-T'JS  monl'or-.p.g  systems or monitor-
    Jng devices  »hen the owner or operator can
    demonstrate that Installation at alternative
    location' will enable accurate and represent-
    ative  measurements.
      39.3 Alternative  procedures for perform-
    ing calibration checks te.g . »ome instruments
    may demonstrate superior drift characteris-
    tics that  require checking at less frequent
    intervals")
      3.94 Alternative monitoring requirement.';
    when the effluent from one affected facility or
    the combined  effluent   from two or  more
    Idcntic-aT affected facilities is released  to the
    atmosphere   through  more than  one point
    (e.g.  an extractive, gaseous monitoring  sys-
    tem used  at  several points may be approved
    If  the procedure? recommended are  suitable
    for generating  accurate  emission averages)
      39.S Alternative  continuous  monitoring
    systems that do not meet the spectral re-
    sponse  requirements  In  Performance  Speci-
    fication 1. Appendix B  of  Part 60. but ade-
    quately demonstrate a definite and consistent
    relationship  between  their  measurements
    »nd the opacity  measurements of a system
    complvlng  with  the requirements  In Per-
    formance  Specification 1  The State may re-
    quire  trial such  demonstration be performed
    for each aflected facility
      4.0  Minirmnn data requirements
      The folio-wing paragraphs  set  forth  the
    minimum data reporting requirements neces-
    «ary to  comply with J 51 19(e) (3) and  (4).
      4 1  The State  plan  shall  require  owners
    or operators of  facilities required to  Install
    continuous  monitoring  systems to submit a
    written report  of excess emissions for each
    calendar quarter and the nature and cause of
    the excess emissions. If known. The averaging
    period  used for data  reporting  should be
    established by the State  to correspond  to the
    averaging period specified  In  the emission
    test method used to determine  compliance
    with  an emission standard  for the pollutant1
    source category In question. The required re-
    port shall Include,  as a  minimum, the data
    ttlpulaled In this Appendix.
      4.2  For opacity measurements, the sum-
    mary shall consist of the magnitude In  actual
    percent opacity  of  all one-minute (or such
    other time period deemed appropriate  by the
    State) averages  of opacity greater than the
    opacity  standard in the applicable plan for
    each  hour of operation of the facility. Aver-
    age values may be obtained  by  Integration
    over  the averaging period or by  arithmeti-
    cally  averaging a minimum  of four equally
    "paced  Instantaneous opacity measurements
    per minute  Any  time period exempted shall
    be considered before determining the  excess
    averages of  opacity  (e.g.. whenever  a regu-
    lation allows two minutes of opacity  meas-
    urements In excess of the standard, the State
    •hall  require the source to report all opacity
    averages, in  any  one  hour. In  excess  of the
    •Undard.  minus  the  two-mlnut«  exemp-
    tion)  If  more  than one  opacity  standard
    applies,  excess emissions data must  be »ub-
    mltted In relation to all such standards
      4.3  Tor  gaseous measurements the sum-
    mary  shall consist  of emission averages, In
    the units of  the applicable standard,  for each
    averaging  period during which  the  appli-
    cable  standard was exceeded.
      4.4  The' date  and  time Identifying each
    period during which the continuous  moni-
    toring system  was,  inoperative,  except for
    zero  and  span  checks,  and  the  nature of
    system  repairs or adjustments ahall  be re-
    ported.  The  State may require proof of con-
    tinuous  monitoring  system  performance
    whenever tyiUm repairs  or adjustment* have
    been made.
      4 5  When  no excess emissions  have oc-
    curred and  the continuous monitoring  sys-
    temis)  have not been Inoperative, repaired.'
    or  adjusted, such Information  shall be In-
    cluded In the report.
      4 6 The State plan shall  require owners or
    operators of affected facilities  to  maintain
    a Me of all Information reported In the quar-
    terly summaries, and all other data collected
    either by the continuous monitoring system
    or as  necessary to convert monitoring datn
    to the units of the  applicable standard for
    a minimum of  two  years  from the date of
    collection of  tuch  data  or submission of
    •uch summaries
      5.0 Data Reduction
      The  State plnn shall require owners or
    operators of affected  facilities to  use  the
    following procedures for   converting  moni-
    toring  data  to units of the standard  where
    necessary-
      5.1 For fossil fuel-fired  steam generators
    the following  procedures  shall be  used to
    convert ga.seous emission monitoring datn In
    parts per million to g'mllllon cal llb'mllllon
    BTU) where necessary:
      5.1.1   When  the owner  or operator  of  a
    fossil fuel-fired steam generator elects under
    subparagraph 2 1 4 of this Appendix to meas-
    ure oxygen  In  the  flue gases,  the  measure-
    ments  of the  pollutant concentration  and
    oxygen concentration shall  erven be on a dry
    basis and the following conversion procedure
    used:
      5.1.2 When  the owner  or operator elects
    under  subparagraph  2.1 4  of  this  Appendix
    to measure carbon  dioxide In  the flue cases.
    the measurement of  the  pollutant concen-
    tration and the carbon dioxide concentration
    shall each be  on a consistent basis (wet or
    dry) and the following conversion procedure
    used:
      5.1.3 The values used In the equations un-
    der paragraph 5 1 are derived as follows
    
             E=r pollutant  emission,   g/mllllon
                cal (lb/milllon BTU).
             C = pollutant   concentration.   g'
                dscm (Ibi'dscf), determined by
                multiplying the average concen-
                tration (ppm) for each hourly
                period  by 4 16V10-"  M  g'dscm
                per  ppm  (264^ 10-"  M  Ib/dscf
                per  ppm)  where  M = pollutant
                molecular weight, g, g-mole  (lb/
                Ib-mole)  M = 64  for sulfur di-
                oxide and 46 for oxides of nitro-
                gen
    '/rO.. r*CO. = Oxygen or  carbon dioxide  vol-
                ume (expressed as percent) de-
                termined with equipment spec-
                ified  under paragraph 4 1.4 of
                this appendix.
          F, F. = a  factor representing  a ratio of
                the  volume of dry  flue gases
                generated to the calorific value
                of the fuel combusted (F). and
                a  factor representing  a ratio of
                the  volume of carbon  dioxide
                generated to the calorific value
                of the fuel combusted (F.) re-
                spectively.  Values of  F  and F.
                are  given In  i6045(f) of  Part
                00. as applicable.
    
      5.2  For  sulfurlc acid plants the owner or
    operator shall:
      52 1 establish  a conversion factor three
    times dally  according to the  procedures to
    • 60 84(b) of this chapter:
      5.2.2 multiply the conversion factor by the
    average lulfur  dioxide concentration In the
    flue  gases  to  obtain  average  sulfur dioxide
    emissions in Kg/metric ton  (Ib/short ton):
    and
      5.2.3 report  the average  sulfur  dioxide
    emission for each averaging period In excess
    of the applicable emission  standard In the
    quarterly nummary.
      53 For  nitric acid plants the owner or
    operator shall:
      531 establish  a conversion factor accord-
    Ing  to the  procedures  of  I60.73(b)  of  this
    chapter.
      5 3.2 multiply the conversion factor by the
    average nitrogen oxides concentration  In the
    flue  gases to obtain the  nitrogen oxides emis-
    sions in the units of the applicable standard,
      53.3 report  the  average nitrogen  oxides
    emission for each averaging period In  excess
    of the applicable emission standard. In the
    quarterly summary.
      5.4 Any  State  may allow data reporting
    or reduction procedures varying from those
    set forth In this Appendix If the owner or
    operator  of a source shows to the satisfaction
    of the State that his  procedures are at least
    as accurate as those  In this Appendix  Such
    procedures may Include but are not limited
    to. the following
      5.4.1 Alternative procedures for computing
    emission averages that  do not require Inte-
    gration of data (e.g.. some facilities may dem-
    onstrate  that the variability  of their emis-
    sions Is sufficiently small to allow accurate re-
    duction of data based upon computing aver-
    ages  from equally spaced data points over the
    averaging period).
      5 4.2 Alternative methods of converting pol-'-
    lutant concentration measurements to the
    units of the emission standards.
      6 0 Special Consideration
      The State plan  may provide for approval, on
    a case-by-case basis,  of alternative monitor-
    Ing  requirements different from the  provi-
    sions of Parts 1 through 5 of this Appendix If
    the provisions of this Appendix (I.e. the In-
    stallation of a contlmious emission monitor-
    Ing  system) cannot  b« Implemented  by  a
    source due  to physical plant limitations or
    extreme  economic reasons  To  make  use of
    this  provision. States must Include  In their
    plan  specific  criteria for determining those
    physical  limitations  or  extreme economic.
    situations to  be  considered by the State. Jn
    such, cases,  when the  State exempts  any
    source subject to this Appendix by use of this
    provision from Installing  continuous emis-
    sion monitoring  systems, the State  shall set
    forth  alternative emission monitoring  and
    reporting requirements  (e.g.. periodic manual
    stack  tests)  to  satisfy the  Intent  of  these
    regulations. Examples of such  special cases
    Include, but are not limited to, Uie following:
      6.1  Alternative monitoring requirements
    may be prescribed when Installation of a con-
    tinuous monitoring system or monitoring de-
    vice  specified by this Appendix would not pro-
    vide  accurate determinations  of emissions
    (e.g.,  condensed, uncomblned  water vapor
    may  prevent  an accurate determination of
    opacity  using commercially  available con-
    tinuous monitoring systems).
      6.2 Alternative  monitoring  requirements
    may be prescribed when the affected facility
    Is Infrequently operated  (e.g.. some affected
    facilities may  operate less than one  month
    per year).
      6.3 Alternative monitoring  requirements
    may be prescribed when the State determines
    that the requirements of this Appendix would
    Impose an extreme economic burden  on the
    aource owner or  operator.
      6.4 Alternative monitoring   requirements
    mnv be prescribed when the State determines
    that  monitoring systems prescribed  by this
    Appendix cannot be Installed  due to physical
    limitations  at the facility.
    
      |FR Doc.75-26566 Filed 10-3-75:8:45 ami
                                      KDUAl ItCISTE*.  VOL. 40, NO  1*4—MONDAY.  OCTOtH t.  1*75
                                                                    11-159
    

    -------
    SUMMARY OF TABLES OF MONITORING REGULATIONS
                   11-160
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #1
    
                          NSPS SOURCE CATEGORIES WHICH ARE
    
                          REQUIRED TO MONITOR CONTINUOUSLY
    Subpart
    
       D
       Da
    Source Category
    
    STEAM GENERATORS
    
       Solid Fossil Fuel
    
    
    
       Liquid Fossil Fuel
    
    
    
       Gaseous Fossil Fuel
    
    ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM
       GENERATING UNITS
    
       Solid Fossil Fuel
                     Liquid Fossil Fuel
    Pollutant
                                                 Opacity
                                                 S02
                                                 NOX
    
                                                 Opacity
                                                 S02
                                                 NO
    Process
                       02 or C02
                       02 or  C02
                                                                    02 or C02
    Opacity            02 or  C02
    S02 (at inlet and
    outlet of control
    device)
    NOX
    
    Opacity            02 or  C02
    S02 (at inlet and
    outlet of control
    device)
       G
    
       H
    
       J
       Gaseous Fossil Fuel
    
    NITRIC ACID PLANTS
    
    SULFURIC ACID PLANTS
    
    PETROLEUM REFINERIES
    
       FCCU
                     Combustion of Fuel
                       Gases
    NOX                02 or C02
    
    
    
    S02
    Opacity
    CO
    
    S02 or
    H2S
                                       11-161
    

    -------
    Table #1, continued
    Subpart
    
       J
    (cont'd)
       R
    TUVWX
      AA
    Source Category                Pollutant
    
    PETROLEUM REFINERIES (cont'd)
    
       Sulfur Recovery Plant       S02a,  H2Sb,  TRSb
    
    IRON AND STEEL PLANTS
                                                                     Process
                  PRIMARY COPPER  SMELTERS
                  PRIMARY ZINC SMELTERS
    PRIMARY LEAD SMELTERS
    PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANTS
                  COAL PREPARATION  PLANTS
                  FERROALLOY PRODUCTION
                     FACILITIES
    STEEL PLANTS:
       ELECTRIC ANC FURNACES
    Opacity
    S02
    
    Opacity
    SO 2
    
    Opacity
    S02
                                   Opacity
    Opacity
                                                                     Pressure loss
                                                                     through venturi
                                                                     scrubber water
                                                                     supply pressure
    Total pressure
    drop across pro-
    cess scrubbing
    systems
    
    Exit gas temp.
    pressure loss
    through venturi
    water supply
    pressure to con-
    trol equipment
    
    Flowrate through
    hood
    Furnace power
    input
    
    Volumetric flow
    rate through each
    separately ducted
    hood.  Pressure
    in the free space
    inside the elect-
    ric arc furnace.
    a  For oxidation control  systems.
    
    b  For reduction control  systems  not  followed by incineration.
                                       11-162
    

    -------
    Table #1,  continued
    Subpart
    
       BB
       HH
    Source Category                Pollutant
    
    KRAFT PULP MILLS
    
       Recovery Furnace
    Process
                                                  Opacity
                                                  TRS  (dry  basis)
                     Lime kiln, digester
                  system, brown stock washer
                  system, multiple  effect  evapo-
                  rator system, black liquor  oxi-
                  dation system, or  condensate
                  stripper system
    
                     Point of  incineration of
                  effluent gases, brown stock
                  washer system, multiple  effect
                  evaporator system, black liquor
                  oxidation system,  or condensate
                  stripper system
                     Lime kiln or  smelt  dissolving
                  tank using a scrubber
                                   TRS  (dry  basis)
    LIME MANUFACTURING PLANTS
    
       Rotary Lime Kilns
                                                 Opacity'
       (dry basis)
    
       (dry basis)
                                                      Temperature
                                                      Pressure loss of
                                                      the gas stream
                                                      through the con-
                                                      trol equipment
    
                                                      Scrubbing liquid
                                                      supply pressure
    Pressure loss
    of steam through
    the scrubber
    
    Scrubber liquid
    supply pressure
    a  Does not apply when there  is  a wet  scrubbing  emission  control  device.
                                       11-163
    

    -------
    Table #1, continued
    
    
    Subpart       Source Category                 Pollutant           process
    
       HH         LIME MANUFACTURING PLANTS
                     (cont'd)
    
                     Lime Hydrator                                   Scrubbing liquid
                                                                     flow rate
    
                                                                     Measurement  of
                                                                     the  electric
                                                                     current  (amperes)
                                                                     used by  the
                                                                     scrubber
                                     11-164
    

    -------
              Subpart
                                     TABLE #2
    
                   OPERATIONAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (NSPS)
    
                                 (Non-Continuous)
    
                   	Requirement
    rE.  Incinerators
    
    "p.  Portland Cement
            Plants
    
     G.  Nitric Acid Plants
    
     H.  Sulfuric Acid Plants
         Petroleum Refineries
     K.
    Storage Vessels  for
       Petroleum Liquids
     0.
     P.
     S.
    Sewage Treatment
       Plants
    Primary Copper
       Smelter
    Primary Aluminum
       Reduction Plants
    Daily charging  rates  and  hours  of  operation.
    
    Daily procuction  rates  and  kiln  feed  rates.
    
    
    Daily production  rate and hours  of  operation.
    
    The conversion  factor shall  be  determined,  as  a
    minimum,  three  times  daily  by measuring  the  con-
    centration of sulfur  dixoide entering  the  con-
    verter.
    
    Record  daily the  average  coke burn-off rate  and
    hours of  operation for  any  fluid catalytic
    cracking  unit catalyst  regenerator  subject  to  the
    particulate or  carbon monoxide  standard.
    
    Maintain  a file of each type of  petroleum  liquid
    stored  and the  dates  of storage.  Show when
    storage vessel  is empty.  Determine and  record
    the average monthly storage  temperature  and  true
    vapor pressure  of the petroleum  liquid stored  if:
    (1) the petroleum liquid, as stored, has a  vapor
    pressure  greater  than 26 mm Hg  but  less  than
    78 mm and is stored in  a  storage vessol  other
    than one  equipped with  a  floating roof,  a  vapor
    recovery  system or their  equivalents; or (2) the
    petroleum liquid  has  a  true  vapor pressure,  as
    stored, greater than 470 mm Hg  and  is  stored in a
    storage vessel  other  than one equipped with  a
    vapor recovery  system or  its equivalent.
    
    Install,  calibrate, maintain, and operate  a  flow
    measuring device  which  can  be used  to  determine
    either  the mass or volume of sludge charged  to
    the incinerator.
    
    Keep a  monthly  record of  the total  smelter  charge
    and the weight  percent  (dry  basis)  of  arsenic,
    antimony, lead, and zinc  contained  in  this
    charge.
    
    Determine daily,  the weight  of  aluminum  and  anode
    produced.  Maintain a record of  daily  production
    rates of  aluminum and anodes, raw material  feed
    rates,  and cell or potline  voltages.
                                        11-165
    

    -------
              Subpart
                              TABLE #2 (cont'd)
    
                   OPERATIONAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS  (NSPS)
    
                                (Non-Continuous)
    
                  	Requirement
    -T.  Phosphate Fertilizer
            Industry:  Wet-
            Process Phosphoric
            Acid Plants
    
     U.  Phosphate Fertilizer
            Industry:  Super-
            phosphoric Acid
            Plants
    
     V.  Phosphate Fertilizer
            Industry:  Diammon-
            ium Phosphate Plants
    
     W.  Phosphate Fertilizer
            Industry:  Triple
            Superphosphate
            Plants
    
     X.  Phosphate Fertilizer
            Industry:  Granular
            Triple Superphos-
            phate Storage
            Facilities
     Z.
    Ferroalloy Production
       Facilities
     AA.
     Steel Plants:
       Electric" Arc
       Furnaces
                             Determine the mass flow of phosphorus-bearing
                             feed material to the process.  Maintain a  daily
                             record of equivalent P205 feed.
                             Determine the mass flow of phosphorus-bearing
                             feed material to the process.  Record  daily  the
                             equivalent P2C>5 feed.
                             Determine the mass flow of phosphorus-bearing
                             feed material to the process.  Maintain a  daily
                             record of equivalent P2^5 feed.
                             Determine the mass flow of phosphorus-bearing
                             feed material to the process.  Maintain a  daily
                             record of equivalent ^2^5 feed..
                             Maintain an accurate account of  triple  super-
                             phosphate in storage.  Maintain  a daily record
                             of total equivalent ?2®5 stored.
    Maintain daily records of  (1) the  product;
    (2) description of constitutents of  furnace
    charge, including the quantity, by weight;
    (3) the time and duration  of each  tapping  period
    and the identification of  material tapped  (slag
    or product); (4) all furnace power input data;
    and (5) all flow rate data or all  fan  motor  power
    consumption and pressure drop data.
    
    Maintain daily records of  (1) the  time and
    duration of each charge; (2) the time  and
    duration of each tap; (3)  all flow rate data;
    and (4) all pressure data.
                                        11-166
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #3
    
                             EMISSION LIMITATIONS (NSPS)
    SUBPART
        D Fossil Fuel-Fired
          Steam Generators
    
             Liquid fossil fuel
             Solid fossile fuel
             Gaseous fossil fuel
             Mixture of fossil
             fuel
    POLLUTANT
    Particulate
    
    
    Opacity
    
    S02
    
    
    NOX
    
    
    Particulate
    
    
    Opacity
    
    S02
    
    
    NOX
    
    
    Particulate
    
    
    Opacity
    
    NOX
    
    
    Particulate
    
    
    Opacity
    
    
    S02
    EMISSION LEVELS
    43 ng/joule
    (0.10 lb/106 Btu)
    
    20% except 27% for 6 min/hr
    
    340 ng/joule
    (0.80 lb/106 Btu)
    
    130 ng/joule
    (0.30 lb/106 Btu)
    
    43 ng/joule
    (0.10 lb/106 Btu)
    
    20% except 27% for 6 min/hr
    
    520 ng/joule
    (1.2 lb/106 Btu)
    
    300 ng/joule
    (0.70 lb/106 Btu)
    
    43 ng/joule
    (0.10 lb/106 Btu)
    
    20% except 27% for 6 min/hr
    
    86 ng/joule
    (0.20 lb/106 Btu)
    
    43 ng/joule
    (0.10 lb/106 Btu)
    
    20% except 27% for 6 min/hr
    
    y(340) + z(520)  *
                            y + z
    
                       x(86) + y(130)
                                                                        z(300)
                                                                  y + z
    *  x = percentage of total heat input from gaseous fossil fuel
       y = percentage of total heat input from liquid fossil fuel
       z = percentage of total heat input from solid fossil fuel
                                       11-167
    

    -------
                                  TABLE #3 (cont'd)
    
                             EMISSION LIMITATIONS (NSPS)
    SUBPART
       G  Nitric Acid Plants
       H  Sulfuric Acid Plants
       J  Petroleum Refineries
    
          Fluid catalytic
          cracking unit
          Glaus sulfur recovery
            plant
       N  Iron and Steel Plants
    
             (BOPF)
    POLLUTANT
    
    NO 2
    
    
    
    Opacity
    
    SO 2
    
    
    
    H2S04 mist
    
    
    
    
    Particulate
    
    
    Opacity
    
    CO
    
    SO 2
    TRS
    H2S
    
    Particulate
    
    Opacity
       P  Primary Copper Smelters
    
             Dryer .                  Particulate
    EMISSION LEVELS
    
    1.5 kg/metric tons of acid
    produced (4.0 Ib/ton of
    acid produced)
    
    10%
    
    2 kg/metric tons of acid
    produced (4.0 Ib/ton of
    acid produced)
    
    0.075 kg/metric tons of
    acid produced (0.15 Ib/ton)
    1.0 kg/1000 of coke burn-
    off
    
    30%
    
    0.050%
    
    0.025%
    0.030%
    0.0010%
    
    50 mg/dscm
    
    10%
    >10% but <20% may occur
    once per steel production
    cycle
                       50 mg/dscm  (0.022 gr/dscf)
                                       11-168
    

    -------
                                TABLE  #3 (cont'd)
    
                          EMISSION  LIMITATIONS  (NSPS)
    SUBPART
    
    
    
             Roaster,  smelting
             furnace,  copper
             converter
    
       Q  Primary Zinc Smelters
    
             Sintering machine
    
    
    
             Roaster
    
    
    
       R  Primary Lead Smelters
                                  POLLUTANT
    
                                  Opacity
    
                                  SO 2
                                 Particulate
    
                                 Opacity
    
                                 SO 2
    
                                 Opacity
          Blast  or  reverberatory Particulate
          furnace,  sintering
          machine discharge end
          Sintering machine,
          electric smelting
          furnace, converter
    T  Phosphate Fertilizer
       Industry:  Wet Process
       Phospheric Acid Plants
    
    U  Phosphate Fertilizer
       Industry:  Super-Phos-
       phoric Acid Plants
    
    V  Phosphate Fertilizer
       Industry:  Diammonium
       Phosphate
    
    W  Phosphate Fertilizer
       Industry:  Triple Super-
       Phosphate
    Opacity
    
    S02
    
    
    Opacity
    
    Total Fluorides
    
    
    
    Total Fluorides
    
    
    
    Total Fluorides
    
    
    
    Total Fluorides
                       EMISSION LEVELS
    
                       20%
    
                       0.065%
    50.mg/dscm (0.022 gr/dscf)
    
    20%
    
    0.065%
    
    20%
    
    
    
    50 mg/dscm (0.022 gr/dscf)
    
    
    
    20%
    
    0.065%
                                                       20%
    
                                                       10 g/metric  ton of
                                                       (0.020 Ib/ton)
                                                       5 g/metric  ton of
                                                       (0.020 Ib/ton)
                                                       30 g/metric  ton of
                                                       (0.060 Ib/ton)
                            feed
                           feed
                            feed
    100 g/metric ton of equival-
    ent ?205 feed (0.20 Ib/ton)
                                    11-169
    

    -------
                                  TABLE #3 (cont'd)
    
                             EMISSION LIMITATIONS (NSPS)
    SUBPART
       X  Phosphate Fertilizer
          Industry:  Granular
          Triple Superphosphate
    POLLUTANT
    Total Fluorides
    EMISSION LEVELS
    
    0.25 g/hr/metric ton of
    equivalent ^2^5 stored
    (5.0 x 10~4 Ib/hr/ton)
       Y  Coal Preparation Plants
    
          Thermal Dryer
          Pneumatic coal
          cleaning equipment
          Processing and
          conveying equipment,
          storage systems,  trans-
          fer and loading systems
    
       Z  Ferroalloy Production
          Facilities
    
          Electric submerged
    Particulate
    
    Opacity
    
    Particulate
    
    Opacity
    
    Opacity
    Particulate
          Dust handling
          equipment
    Opacity
    
    CO
    
    Opacity
    0.070 g/dscm (0.031 gr/dscf)
    
    20%
    
    0.040 g/dscm (0.031 gr/dscf)
    
    10%
    
    20%
    0.45 kg/MW-hr (0.99 Ib/MW-hr)
    (high silicon alloys)
    0.23 kg/MW-hr (0.51 Ib/MW-hr)
    (chrome and manganese alloys)
    
    15%
    
    20%
    
    10%
                                        11-170
    

    -------
                                  TABLE #3 (cont'd)
    
                             EMISSION LIMITATIONS (NSPS)
    SUBPART
    POLLUTANT
       AA  Steel Plants
    
             Electric Arc furnaces  Particulate
    
             Control device         Opacity
    
             Shop roof              Opacity
             Dust handling
             equipment
    
       BB  Kraft Pulp Mills
    
             Recovery Furnace
             Straight recovery
             furnace
    
             Cross recovery
             furnace
    
             Smelt dissolving
             tank
             Lime kiln
    
             gaseous fuel
             liquid fuel
    Opacity
    
    
    
    
    Particulate
    
    Opacity
    
    TRS
    
    
    TRS
    
    
    Particulate
    
    
    TRS
    
    
    TRS
    
    Particulate
    Particulate
             Digester system,  brown
             stock washer system,
             multiple-effect vaporation
             system,  black liquor
             oxidation system or
             condensate stripper    TRS
    EMISSION LEVELS
    
    
    
    12 mg/dscm (0.0052 gr/dscf)
    
    3%
    
    0%, except:
    20% - charging
    40% - tapping
    
    10%
    0.10 g/dscm
    
    35%
    
    5 ppm
    
    
    25 ppm
    0.Ig/kg black liquor
    (dry out)
    
    0.0084 g/kg black liquor
    (dry out)
    
    8 ppm
    
    0.15g/dscm
    0.30g/dscm
                       5 ppm
                                        11-171
    

    -------
                                  TABLE #3 (cont'd)
    
    
                             EMISSION LIMITATIONS (NSPS)
    
    
    
    SUBPART                         POLLUTANT          EMISSION LEVELS
       HH  Lime Manufacturing
           Plants
    
             Rotary Lime Kiln       Particulate        0.15  kg/megagram of lime-
                                                       stone feed
    
                                    Opacity            10%
    
             Lime Hydrator          Particulate        0.075 kg/megagram of  lime
                                                       feed
                                        11-172
    

    -------
                                       TABLE #4
    
    
    
    
     PROPOSAL  AND  PROMULGATION DATES  OF EMISSION LIMITATIONS FOR NSPS SOURCE CATEGORIES
    Subpart
    D
    Da
    E
    F
    G
    H
    I
    J
    K
    L
    M
    N
    0
    P
    Q
    R
    S
    TUVWX
    Y
    Z
    AA
    BB
    DD
    HH
    Source
    Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generators
    Electric Utility Steam Generators
    Incinerators
    Portland Cement Plants
    Nitric Acid Plants
    Sulfuric Acid Plants
    Asphalt Concrete Plants
    Petroleum Refineries
    Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids
    Secondary Lead Smelters
    Brass and Bronze Production
    Iron and Steel Plants
    Sewage Treatment Plants
    Primary Copper Smelter
    Primary Zinc Smelter
    Primary Lead Smelter
    Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants
    Phosphate Fertilizer Industry
    Coal Preparation Plants
    Ferroalloy Production Plants
    Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces
    Kraft Pulp Mills
    Grain Elevators
    Lime Manufacturing
    Promulgation
    Date
    12/23/71
    6/11/79
    12/23/71
    12/23/71
    12/23/71
    12/23/71
    3/08/74
    3/08/74
    3/08/74
    3/08/74
    3/08/74
    3/08/74
    3/08/74
    1/15/76
    1/15/76
    1/15/76
    1/26/76
    8/06/75
    1/15/76
    5/04/76
    9/23/75
    2/23/78
    8/03/78
    3/07/78
    Proposed
    Date
    8/17/71
    9/18/78
    8/17/71
    8/17/71
    8/17/71
    8/17/71
    6/11/73
    6/11/73
    6/11/73
    6/11/73
    6/11/73
    6/11/73
    6/11/73
    10/16/74
    10/16/74
    10/16/74
    10/23/74
    10/22/74
    10/24/74
    10/21/74
    10/21/74
    9/24/76
    1/03/77*
    8/03/78
    3/03/77
    a  Suspended on 6/24/77.
                                         11-173
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #5
    
                        NSPS CONTINUOUS MONITORING  REQUIREMENTS
    
    
      I.  Installed and operational prior  to  conducting  performance tests.1
    
     II.  Conduct monitoring system performance  evaluations  during performance
          tests or 30 days thereafter.
    
    III.  Check zero and span drift at least  daily  (see  Table  #8).
    
     IV.  Time for cycle of operations (sampling, analyzing, and  data recording).
          A.  Opacity - 10 seconds
          B.  Gas Monitors - 15 minutes
    
      V.  Installed to provide representative sampling
    
     VI.  Reduction of data.
          A.  Opacity - 6-minute average
          B.  Gaseous Pollutants - hourly  average
    
    VII.  Source must notify agency, more  than  30 days prior,  of  date upon which
          demonstration of continuous monitoring system  performance is to com-
          mence.
       Performance tests shall be conducted  within  60  days  after achieving the
    maximum production rate at which  the  affected  facility  will be operated,  but
    not later than 180 days after initial startup  of  such facility.
                                         11-174
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #  6
    
                      QUARTERLY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS1  (NSPS)
    
      I.  Excess Emissions
          A.  Description of Excess Emission
              1.  Magnitude
              2.  Conversion factors used
              3.  Date and time of commencement and completion
          B.  Explanation of Excess Emission
              1.  Occurrances during start-ups, shutdowns, and malfunctions
              2.  Nature and cause of malfunction
              3.  Corrective and preventative  action taken
          C.  To be submitted in Units Same as Standard
    
     II.  Continuous Monitoring Systems
          A.  Date and Time when System was Inoperative  (except for zero and span
              checks)
          B.  Nature of System Repairs or Adjustments
    
    III.  Lack of Occurrances During A Quarter
          A.  Absence of Excess Emissions during Quarter
          B.  Absence of Adjustments, Repairs, or Inoperativeness of Continuous
              Monitoring System
    1  "Each owner or operator  required  to  install  a  continuous  monitoring  system
    shall submit a written report  .  .  .  for  every calendar  quarter"
    
       "All quarterly reports shall  be postmarked by  the  30th  day  following the
    end of each calendar quarter  ..."
                                         11-175
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #7
    
                        DEFINITION OF EXCESS EMISSIONS  (NSPS)
    
    SUBPART   POLLUTANT     EXCESS EMISSION
    
       D      opacity       any six-minute period  during which  the  average opa-
                            city of emissions exceed 20% opacity,  except  that  one
                            six-minute average per hour of  up  to  27%  opacity need
                            not be reported.
    
              S02           any three-hour period  during which  the  average
                            emissions of S02 (arithmetric average  of  three con-
                            tiguous one-hour periods) exceed  the  standard.
    
              NOX           any three-hour period  during which  the  average
                            emissions of NOX (arithmetric average  of  three con-
                            tiguous one-hour periods) exceed  the  standard.
    
       G      NOX           any three-hour period  during which  the  average nitro-
                            gen oxides emissions (arithmetric average of  three
                            contiguous one-hour periods) exceed the standard.
    
       H      S02           all three-hour periods (or  the  arithmetric average  of
                            three consecutive one-hour periods) during which the
                            integrated average sulfur dioxide emissions exceed  the
                            applicable standards.
    
       J      Opacity       all one-hour periods which  contain  two  or more six-
                            minute periods during which the average opacity
                            exceeds 30 percent.
    
              CO            all hourly periods during which the average CO con-
                            centration exceeds the standard.
    
              S02           any three-hour period  during which  the  average con-
                            centration of S02 emissions from  any  fuel gas  com-
                            bustion device exceeds the  standard.
    
              S02           any twelve-hour period during which the average con-
                            centration of S02 emissions from  any  Glaus sulfur
                            recovery plant exceed  the standard.
    
       P      Opacity       any six-minute period  during which  the  average opacity
                            exceeds the standard.
    
              S02           any six-hour period during which  the  average  emissions
                            of S02 (arithmetric mean of six contiguous one-hour
                            periods) exceed the standard.
    
       Q      Opacity       any six-minute period  during which  the  average opacity
                            exceeds the standard.
    
              S02           any two-hour period during  which  the  average  emissions
                            of S02 (arithmetric mean of two contiguous one-hour
                            periods) exceed the standard.
    
                                        11-176
    

    -------
    SUBPART
    
       R
                            TABLE  #7
    
              DEFINITION OF EXCESS EMISSIONS  (NSPS)
    
    POLLUTANT     EXCESS EMISSION
      AA
    Opacity
    
    
    S02
    
    
    
    Opacity
    
    
    Opacity
      BB
    Recovery  TRS
    Furnace
              Opacity
    Lime Kiln TRS
    Digester  TRS
    system,
    brown stock
    washer system,
    multiple-effect
    evaporator system,
    black liquor oxidation
    system, or condensate
    stripper.
      HH
    Opacity
    any six-minute period  during which  the  average  opacity
    exceeds the standard.
    
    any two-hour period  during which  the  average  emissions
    of S02 (arithmetric  mean  of two contiguous  one-hour
    periods) exceed  the  standard.
    
    all six-minute periods  in which the average opacity  is
    15 percent or greater.
    
    all six-minute periods  during which the  average  opa-
    city is 3 percent or greater.
                  any  twelve-hour  period during which the TRS  emissions
                  exceed  the  standard.
    
                  any  six-minute period  during  which the  average  opacity
                  exceeds  the  standard.
    
                  any  twelve-hour  period during which the TRS  emissions
                  exceed  the  standard.
    
                  any  twelve-hour  period during which the TRS  emissions
                  exceed  the  standard.
    all six-iainute periods  during which  the  average  opa-
    city is greater  than  the  standard.
                                         11-177
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #8
    
                              SPANNING AND ZEROING  (NSPS)
    
      I.   Explanation of Zero and Span Checks
          A.  Extractive gas monitors
              1.  Span gas composition
                  a.  S02 ~ sulfur dioxide/nitrogen or  air-gas  mixture
                  b.  NO - nitric oxide/oxygen-free nitrogen  mixture
                  c.  N02 - nitrogen dioxide/air mixture
              2.  Zero gases
                  a.  Ambient air
              or  b.  A gas certified by the manufacturer  to  contain less  than
                      1 ppm of the pollutant gas
              3.  Analysis of span and zero gases
                  a.  Span and zero gases certified by  their  manufacturer  to be
                      traceable to National Bureau  of Standards reference  gases
                      shall be used whenever these  gases are  available.
                  b.  Span and zero gases should be reanalyzed  every six months
                      after date of manufacture with Reference  Method 6  for
                      S02 and 7 for NOX
                  c.  Span and zero gases shall be  analyzed two weeks prior to
                      performance specification tests
          B.  Non-extractive gas monitors
              1.  Span check - certified gas cell or test  cell
              2.  Zero check - mechanically produced or calculated from  upscale
                  measurements
          C.  Transmissometers
              1.  Span check is a neutral density filter that is certified within
                  +^3 percent opacity
              2.  Zero check is a simulated zero.
          D.  Span values are specified in each subpart
              1.  Span check is 90 percent of span.
    
     II.   Adjustment of Span and Zero
          A.  Adjust the zero and span whenever the zero or calibration  drift
              exceeds the limits of applicable performance specification in
              Appendix B
              1.  For opacity, clean optional surfaces  before adjusting  zero or
                  span drift
              2.  For opacity systems using automatic zero adjustments,  the opti-
                  cal surfaces shall be cleaned when the cumulative automatic zero
                  compensation exceeds four percent opacity
    
    III.   How to Span and Zero
          A.  Extractive gas monitors
              1.  Introduce the zero and span gas into  the monitoring system as
                  near the probe as practical
          B.  Non-extractive gas monitors
              1.  Use a certified gas cell or test  cell  to check span
              2.  The zero check is performed by computing the  zero value  from
                  upscale measurements or by mechanically  producing a zero
          C.  Transmissometers
              1.  Span check with a neutral density filter
              2.  Zero check by simulating a zero opacity
    
                                        11-178
    

    -------
     SUBPART
    
     D  Fossil Fuel Fired Steam
       Generators
    
       liquid fossil fuel
       solid fossil fuel
    
    
    
       gaseous fuel
    
       mixutures of fossil fuels
    Da Electric Utility Steam
       Generators
       gaseous fuel
    
       liquid fossil fuel
    
       solid fossil fuel
    
      *FGD Inlet
    
    
      *FGD Outlet
    
    
    G  Nirtic Acid Plants
    
    H  Sulfuric Acid Plants
    
    J  Petroleum Refineries
    
       Catalytic Cracker
    
    
       Claus Recovery Plant
    
    
    
       Fuel Gas Combustion
            TABLE #9
    
    SPAN SPECIFICATIONS (NSPS)
    
             POLLUTANT
             SPAN
             opacity
             S02
             NOX
    
             opacity
             S02
               X
             NO
               x
             opacity
             S02
             Opacity
    
             NOX
    
             NOX
    
             NOX
    
             SO 2
    
    
             SO 2
    
    
             NO 2
    
             SO 2
             opacity
             CO
    
             SO 2
             H2S
             TRS
    
             SO 2
             H2S
    80, 90, or 100% opacity
    1000 ppm
    500 ppm
    
    80, 90, or 100% opacity
    1500 ppm
    1000 ppm
    
    500 ppm
    
    80, 90, or 100% opacity
    lOOOy + ISOOz1
    500 (x + Y) + lOOOz
    60%-80%
    
    500 ppm
    
    500 ppm
    
    1000 ppm
    
    125% of max.  estimated
    potential emissions
    
    50% of max.  estimated
    hourly potential emissions
    
    500 ppm
    
    1000 ppm
    60, 70, or 80% opacity
    1000 ppm
    
    500 ppm
    20 ppm
    600 ppm
    
    100 ppm
    300 ppm
    *Span values for S02 are specified for FGD inlet and outlet and apply to
     liquid and solid fossil fuels.
    

    -------
    SUBPART
    P  Primary Copper Smelters
         TABLE #9
    
    SPAN SPECIFICATIONS
    
          POLLUTANT
    
          opacity
          S02
             SPAN
    
    80 to 100% opacity
    0.20% by volume
    Q  Primary Zinc Smelters
          opacity
          S02
    80 to 100% opacity
    0.20% by volume
    R  Primary Lead Smelters
          opacity
          S02
    80 to 100% opacity
    0.20% by volume
    Z  Ferroalloy Production
       Facilities
          opacity
    not specified
    AA Steel Plants
    
    BB Kraft Pulp Mills
    
       Recovery Furnace
       Kime Kiln, recovery furnace
       digester system, brown stock
       washer system, multiple effect  TRS
       evaporator system, black liquor
       oxidation system, or condensate
       stripper system
          opacity
    
    
    
          opacity
    
          02
    HH Lime Manufacturing Plant
          opacity
    not specified
    
    
    
    70% opacity
    
    20%
    
    30 ppm
    (except that for any
    cross recovery furnace
    the span shall be 500 ppm)
    
    40% opacity
       x = fraction of total heat input  from  gas
       y = fraction of total heat input  from  liquid  fossil  fuel
       z = fraction of total heat input  from  solid fossil fuel
       Span value shall be rounded off  to  the  nearest  500 ppm.
                                         11-180
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #10
    
                             NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS1
    
    Requirements
    
      I.  Date of Commencement of Construction
    
    
     II.  Anticipated Date of Initial Start-Up
    
    
    III.  Actual Date of Initial Start-Up
    
     IV.  Any physical or operational change  to  a
          facility which may increase the emission
          rate of any air pollutant  to which  a
          standard applies
    
          A.  The precise nature of  the  change
          B.  Present and proposed emission control
              systems
          C.  Productive capacity before and  after
              the change
          D.  Expected completion date of change
    
      V.  Date upon which demonstration  of continuous
          monitoring system performance  commences
    Time Deadline
    
    Less than 30 days after
    such date
    
    Less than 60 or more than
    30 days prior to date
    
    Within 15 days after date
    
    Postmarked 60 days or as
    soon as practical before
    the change is commenced
    More than 30 days prior
    1  "Any owner or operator  subject  to  the  provisions  of  this  part  will  furnish
    the Adminstrator written notification..."
                                         11-181
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #11
    
                           SUBPART Da EMISSION LIMITATIONS
    
                           AND REQUIRED PERCENT REDUCTIONS
    Fuel
    
    Coal
          Pollutant
          S02
                       NO
                         x
    Liquid Fossil
    Fuel
    Particulate Matter
    
          SO 2
    Gas
          NOX
    
    Particulate Matter
    
          S02
                       NOX
    
                Particulate Matter
    
    Coal-derived       NOX
    gaseous fuel
    Emission Limitation
    
    520ng/J (1.201b/106Btu)
    
    
    
    
    210ng/J (0.501b/106Btu)
    
    13ng/J (0.03lb/106Btu)
    
    340ng/J (0.801b/106Btu)
    130ng/J (0.301b/106Btu)
    
    13ng/J (0.03lb/106Btu)
    
    340ng/J (0.801b/106Btu)
                          86ng/J (0.201b/106Btu)
    
                          13ng/J (0.03lb/106Btu)
    
                          210ng/J (0.501b/106Btu)
         Required
    Percent Reduction
    
           90%
    (70% if emissions
    are less than
    260ng/J)
    
           65%*
    
           99%*
    
           90%
    (if emissions are
    below 86ng/J, there
    is no reduction
    requirement)
    
           30%*
    
           70%*
    
           90%
    (if emissions are
    below 86ng/J, there
    is no reduction
    requirement)
    
           25%*
                                   25%*
    *  Compliance with the emission limitation constitutes  compliance  with  the
    percent reduction requirements.
                                        11-182
    

    -------
     Table #11, continued
     Fuel
     Lignite mined in
    Pollutant
    NO,
     N.  Dakota,  S.  Dakota,
     or  Montana  and is com-
    - busted in a slag type
     furnace
     Other Lignite
    NO,
     Subbituminous Coal NO,
     Bituminous Coal    NO
    
     Anthracite Coal    NO,
      x
    Emission Limitation
    
    340ng/J (0.81b/106Btu)
         Required
    Percent Reduction
    
           65%*
    260ng/J (0.61b/106Btu)
    
    210ng/J (0.51b/106Btu)
    
    260ng/J (0.61b/106Btu)
    
    260ng/J (0.61b/106Btu)
           65%*
    
           65%*
    
           65%*
    
           65%*
     *  Compliance  with the emission limitation constitutes compliance with the
     percent  reduction requirements.
                                         11-183
    

    -------
                             TABLE #12
    
                    PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS
                         TRANSMISSOMETERS
    Calibration Error
    
    Zero Drift (24-hour)
    
    Calibration Drift (24-hour)
    
    Response Time
    
    Operational Test Period
    
    
                            NOV and S02
    
    Accuracy
    
    
    
    Calibration Error
    
    
    
    Zero Drift (2-hour)
    
    Zero Drift (24-hour)
    
    Calibration Drift (2-hour)
    
    Calibration Drift (24-hour)
    
    Response Time
    
    Operational Period
    
    
                            0? and CO?
    
    Zero Drift (2-hour)
    
    Zero Drift (24-hour)
    
    Calibration Drift (2-hour)
    
    Calibration Drift (24-hour)
    
    Operational Period
    
    Response Time
    £3 percent opacity
    
    £2 percent opacity
    
    £2 percent opacity
    
    10 seconds maximum
    
    168 hours
    £20 percent of the mean value
    of the reference method test
    data
    
    £5 percent of (50 percent, 90
    percent) calibration gas mix-
    ture value
    
    2 percent of span
    
    2 percent of span
    
    2 percent of span
    
    2.5 percent of span
    
    15 minutes maximum
    
    168 hours minimum
    £0.4 percent Q£ or C02
    
    £0.5 percent 02 or C02
    
    £0.4 percent 02 or C02
    
    £0.5 percent 02 or C02
    
     168 hours  minimum
    
     10 minutes
                               11-184
    

    -------
                             TABLE #13
    
             UHEN TO RUN THE MONTIOR PERFORMANCE TEST
    Initial
    Facility
    Start-up
                         180
                         Days
                         Max.
    Max.
    Production
    Rate Reached
    Performance
    Test and Submit
    Report for
    Compliance
     60
    Days
                       Monitor
                      Performance
                        Test
                                     t
                                     30
                                    Days
                                     I
                                       60
                                      Days
                                             Monitor Performance
                                             Test Report
                               11-185
    

    -------
                                      TABLE #14
    
                           REQUIREMENTS FOR SIP REVISIONS
    
      I.   Submit SIP revisions by October 6, 1976
    
     II.   Contain monitoring requirements for  the following  sources  (as  a minimum)
    
          A.   Fossil Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
          B.   Sulfuric Acid Plants
          C.   Nitric Acid Plants
          D.   Petroleum Refineries
          (see Table #15)
    
    III.   Require that sources evaluate the performance of their  monitoring  system
    
     IV.   Require the sources to maintain a file of all pertinent continuous moni-
          toring data
    
          A.   Emission measurements
          B.   Monitoring system evaluation data
          C.   Adjustments and maintenance performed on the monitoring  system
    
      V.   Require the source to submit periodic (such period  not  to  exceed 3
          months) reports containing the following information
    
          A.   Number and magnitude of excess emissions
          B.   Nature and cause of excess emissions
          C.   Statement concerning absence of  excess emissions  and/or  monitor in-
              operativeness
    
     VI.   Require that monitoring begin within 18 months of  EPA approval of  the
          SIP revision (or within 18 months of EPA promulgation)
                                        11-186
    

    -------
                                       TABLE #15
             EXISTING  SOURCES  REQUIRED  TO CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR EMISSIONS
    Source
    Fossil-Fuel Fired
    Steam Generators
    Pollutant
    SO 2
                                 NO,
                                  Opacity
    Nitric Acid Plants
    
    
    
    Sulfuric Acid Plants
    
    Petroleum Refineries
    NOX
    
    
    
    SO 2
    
    Opacity
                Comments
    
    1.  >250 x 106 Btu/hr
    2.  Source that has control equip-
        ment for S02
    
    1.  >1000 x 106 Btu/hr
    2.  Located in a designated non-
        attainment area for N0£
    3.  Exempt if source is 30% or
        more below the emission
        standard
    
    1.  >250 x 106 Btu/hr
    2.  Exempt if burning gas
    3.  Exempt if burning oil, or a
        mixture of oil and gas are the
        only fuels used and the source
        is able to comply with the
        applicable particulate matter
        and opacity standards without
        installation of control equip-
        ment
    
    1.  >300 ton/day
    2.  Located in a designated non-
        attainment area for N02
    
    1.  >300 tons/day
    
    1.  >20,000 barrels/day
                                         11-187
    

    -------
                    SECTION III
    
    
    
    
    VENDORS OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING EQUIPMENT
                      III-l
    

    -------
     Acurex Autodata
     485 Clyde Avenue
     Mountain View,  CA 94042
                Allis Chalmers Corporation
                Box 512
                Milwaukee, WI 53201
    Analytical  Instrument
    Development,  Inc.
    Rt. 41 and  Newark  Road
    Avondale, PA  19311
    
    Asarco,  Inc.
    3422  South  700 West
    Salt  Lake City.  UT 84119
    B  G  I,  Inc.
    58 Guinan  Street
    Waltham, MA   02154
    Bachrach  Instrument  Co.
    2300 Leghorn  Street
    Mountain  View,  CA  94043
    Bambeck  Co.
    1000 Quail St.,  Suite  290
    Newport  Beach,  CA  92660
    Bausch  & Lomb Anal.
    Division
    820 Linden Avenue
    Rochester, NY  14625
    Sys.
    Bendix Corp. EPID  Div.
    Box 831
    Lewisburg, WV  24901
    
    Bio Marine Industries,  Inc.
    45 Great Valley  Center
    Malvern, PA  19355
    
    CEA Instruments, Inc.
    15 Charles Street
    Westwood, NJ 07675
    
    Chemetrics, Inc.
    Mill Run Drive
    Warrenton, NJ  22186
    Chemtrix, Inc.
    163 SW Freeman Avenue
    Hillsboro, OR 97123
                Andersen Samplers, Inc.
                4215-C Wendell Dr. SW
                Atlanta, GA 30336
    Astro Ecology/Astro
    Resource
    801 Link Road
    League City, TX 77058
    
    Babcock & Wilcox Co.
    Bailey Meter Co.
    29801 Euclid Avenue
    Wickliffe, OH  44092
    
    Bahnson Div. Envirotech
    Corporation
    Box 10458 Salem Station
    Winston-Salem,  NC 27108
    
    Baseline Industries, Inc.
    Box 649
    Lyons, CO 80540
    
    Beckman Inst. PID
    2500 Harbor Blvd.
    Fullerton, CA 92634
                Berkeley Controls
                2700 Dupont Dr.
                Irvine,  CA 92715
    
                Brinkman Instruments,  Inc.
                Cantiague Road
                Westbury, NY 11590
    
                Calibrated Instruments,  Inc.
                731 Saw Mill River Road
                Ardsley, NY 10502
    
                Chemical Sensor  Develop.
                Co.
                5606 Calle de Arboles
                Torrance, CA 90505
    
                Clean Air Engineering,  Inc.
                835 Sterling Avenue
                Palatine, IL 60067
                               III-2
    

    -------
    Cleveland Controls, Inc.
    5755 Granger Rd., Suite 850
    Cleveland, OH 44109
    
    Columbia Scientific Inds.
    Box 9908
    Austin, TX 78766
    
    Control Instruments Corp.
    18 Passaic Avenue
    Fairfield, NJ 07006
    
    Datatest, Inc.
    1117 Cedar Avenue
    Croydon, PA 19020
    
    Delta Scientific Div.
    250 Marcus Blvd.
    Hauppauge, NY 11787
    
    Dynamatrion, Inc.
    168 Enterprise Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI 48103
    
    Dynatech R/D Co.
    99 Erie St.
    Cambridge, MA 02139
    
    Ecologic Instrument
    132 Wilbur Place
    Bohemia, NY  11716
    
    Energetics Science, Inc.
    85 Executive Blvd.
    Elmsford, NY 10523
    
    Environmental Data Corp.
    608 Fig Avenue
    Monrovia, CA  91016
    
    Esterline Angus Div. Esterline
    Box 24000
    Indianapolis, IN 46224
    
    Foxboro/ICT Inc.
    414 Pendleton Way
    Oakland, CA 94621
    
    Gil Enterprises, Inc.
    Box 3356
    Cherry Hill, NJ 08034
    
    Gow Mac Instrument Co.
    Box 32
    Bound Brook, NJ  08805
    Climet Instruments Div. WEHR
    1320 W. Colton Ave., Box  151
    Redlands, CA 92373
    
    Contraves-Goerz Corp.
    610 Epsilon Dr.
    Pittsburgh, PA 15238
    
    Dasibi Environmental Corp.
    616 E. Colorado St.
    Glendale, CA  91205
    
    Delta F Corporation
    One Walnut Hill Park
    Wo burn, MA  01801
    
    Dupont Instrument Products
    Concord Plaza
    Wilmington, DE 19898
    
    Dynasciences Env. Prods. Div.
    Township Line Road
    Blue Bell, PA  19422
    
    Dynatron Inc.
    Box 745
    Wallingford, CT 06492
    
    Electronics Corp. of Amer.
    1 Memorial Drive
    Cambridge, MA  02142
    
    Enmet Corp.
    2308 S. Industrial
    Ann Arbor, MI 48104
    
    Environmental Techtronics Corp.
    101 James Way
    Southampton, PA  18966
    
    Fischer & Porter Co.
    125E County Line Road
    Warminster, PA  18974
    
    G C A Precision Scientific
    3737 W. Cortland St.
    Chicago, IL  60647
    
    General Monitors, Inc.
    3019 Enterprise St.
    Costa Mesa, CA  92626
                               III-3
    

    -------
     Gubelin Inds., Inc.
     45 Kensico Dr., Box 307
     Mt. Kisco, NY  10549
    
     High Voltage Eng.  Corp. Ind.
       Corp.
     South Bedford Street
     Burlington,  MA  01803
    
     Horiba Instruments,  Inc.
     1021  Duryea  Avenue
     Irvine, CA 92714
    
     Hydrolab Corp.
     Box 9406
     Austin, TX  78766
    
     ITT Barton
     Box 1882
     City  of Industry,  CA 91749
    
     Instruments  SA,  Inc.
     173 Essex  Avenue
     Metuchen,  NJ  08840
    
     InterScan  Corp.
     9614  Cozycroft Avenue
     Chatsworth,  CA 91311
    
     K V B Equipment  Corp.
     17332 Irvine Blvd.
     Tustin, CA  92680
    
     Lamotte Chemical Prods.  Co.
     Box 329
     Chestertown,  MD  21620
    
     Leco  Corp.
     3000  Lakeview Avenue
     St. Joseph,  MI   49085
    
     Lockwood & Mclorie,  Inc.
     Box 113
     Horsham, PA   19044
    
     M D A Scientific,  Inc.
     Bob Busse  Highway
     Park  Ridge,  IL   60068
    
    Mast  Development Co.
     2212  East  12th St.
     Davenport, IA  52803
     H  N U Systems,  Inc.
     30 Ossipee  Road
     Newton Upper  Falls,  MA   02164
    
     Honeywell,  Inc.
     1100 Virginia Drive
     Ft.  Washington, PA  19034
    Houston Atlas,  Inc.
    9441 Baythorne  Street
    Houston, TX 77041
    
    I R T  Corp.
    7650 Convoy Court
    San Diego, CA 92111
    
    Infrared Industries, Inc.
    Box 989
    Santa  Barbara, CA 93102
    
    International Sensor Tech.
    3201 South Halladay St.
    Santa  Ana, CA  91311
    
    Jacoby Tarbox Corp.
    808 Nepperhan Avenue
    Yonkers, NY  10703
    
    Kernco Instruments Co., Inc.
    420 Kenazo Avenue
    El Paso, TX  79927
    
    Lear Siegler,  Inc.
    74 Inverness Drive East
    Englewood,  CO   80110
    
    Leeds  & Northrup
    Sumneytown Pike
    North Wales, PA  19454
    
    Lumicor Safety Products Corp.
    5364 NW 167th St.
    Miami,  FL  33014
    
    Martek Instruments, Inc.
    17302 Daimler, Box 16487
    Irvine, CA  92713
    
    Meloy Labs, Inc.
    6715 Electronic Drive
    Springfield, VA  22151
                               III-4
    

    -------
    Meteorology Research, Inc.
    Box 637
    Altadena, CA  91001
    
    Mine Safety Applicances Co.
    600 Penn Center Blvd.
    Pittsburgh, PA 15235
    
    Monitor Labs, Inc.
    10180 Scripps Ranch Blvd.
    San Diego, CA 92131
    
    Napp, Inc.
    8825 N. Lamar
    Austin, TX 78753
    
    Oceanography Intl. Corp.
    Box 2980
    College Station,  TX  77840
    
    Overhoff & Associates
    P. 0. Box 8091
    Cincinnati, OH  45208
    
    Particle Measuring Systems,
     Inc.
    1855 S. 57th Court
    Boulder, CO  80301
    
    Phoenix Precision Instru.
    Route 208
    Gardner, NY 12525
    
    Photomation, Inc.
    270 Polaris Avenue
    Mt. View, CA 94043
    Princeton Aqua Science
    789 Jersey Avenue
    New Brunswick, NJ  08902
    
    Pullman Kellogg Div. of Pullman
    1300 Three Greenway Plaza E
    Houston, TX  77046
    
    Rexnord, Inc. Instrument PDTS
    30 Great Valley Parkway
    Malvern, PA  19355
    
    Science Spectrum
    Box 3003
    Santa Barbara, CA  93105
    Milton Roy Co. Hays Republic
    4333 S. Ohio St.
    Michigan City, IN 46360
    
    Modern Controls, Inc.
    340 Snelling Avenue S.
    Minneapolis, MN 55406
    
    Montedoro Whitney Corp.
    Box 1401
    San Luis Obispo, CA 93406
    
    National Draeger, Inc.
    401 Parkway View Drive
    Pittsburgh, PA 15203
    
    Orion Research, Inc.
    380 Putnam Avenue
    Cambridge, MA   02139
    
    PCI Ozone Corp.
    One Fairfield Crescent
    West Caldwell, NJ  07006
    
    Perkin Elmer Corp.
    411 Clyde Avenue
    Mountain View, CA 94043
    Photobell Co., Inc.
    162 5th Avenue
    New York, NY  10010
    Preferred Instru. Div.
    Preferred Utilities Mfg. Corp.
    11 South St.
    Danbury, CT  06810
    
    Process Analyzers, Inc.
    1101 State Road
    Princeton, NJ  08540
    
    Research Appliance Co.
    Moose Lodge Rd., P.O. Box 2
    Cambridge, MD  21613
    
    Schneider Instrument  Co.
    8115 Camargo Rd. - Madeira
    Cincinnati, OH  45243
    
    Scientific Resources, Inc.
    3300 Commercial Avenue
    Northbrook, IL  60062
                               III-5
    

    -------
    Sensors,  Inc.
    3908  Varsity Drive
    Ann Arbor, MI   48104
    
    Sierra Instruments
    Box 909 Village Square
    Carmel Valley,  CA   93924
    
    Source Gas Analyzers, Inc.
    7251  Garden Grove Blvd.
    Garden Grove, CA 92641
    
    T S I
    Box 43394
    St. Paul, MN  55164
    
    Teledyne  Analytical Insts.
    Box 70
    San Gabriel, CA 91776
    
    Thermo Electron Corp. Env.
    108 South St.
    Hopkinton, MA   01748
    
    Theta Sensors
    17635 A Rowland St.
    City  of Industry, CA  91748
    
    United McGill Corp.
    Box 820
    Columbus, OH  43216
    
    Wallace & Tiernan Div. Pennwalt
    25 Main St.
    Belleville, NJ   07109
    
    Wellsbach Ozone Sys. Corp.
    3340  Stokley St.
    Philadelphia, PA 19129
    Western Research  & Dev.,  Ltd.
    1313 44th Avenue  NE
    Calgary, Alta. Canada   T2E6L5
    
    Xonics, Inc.
    6862 Hayvenhurst  Avenue
    Van Nuys, CA  91406
    Siemens Corp. P. E. Div.
    186 Wood Avenue S.
    Iselin, NJ  08830
    
    Sierra Misco, Inc.
    1825 E. Shore Highway
    Berkeley,  CA  94710
    
    Systems Science & Software
    Box 1620
    La Jolla,  CA  92038
    
    Taylor Instrument Div.  Sybron
    95 Ames St.
    Rochester, NY  14601
    
    Thermco Instrument Corp.
    Box 309
    La Porte,  IN  46350
    
    Thermox Instruments, Inc.
    6592 Hamilton Avenue
    Pittsburgh,  PA  15206
    
    Tracor, Inc.
    6500 Tracor Lane
    Austin, TX  78721
    
    Virtis Co.
    Route 208
    Gardner, NY  12525
    
    Wallace Fisher Instrument  Co.
    Box 51 Ocean Grove Station
    Swansea, MA  02777
    
    Western Precipitation Division
    Joy Manufacturing Company
    Post Office Box 2744 Termina Annex
    Los Angeles, CA 90051
    
    Whittaker Corp.
    10880 Wilshire Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA  90024
                               III-6
    

    -------
                SECTION IV
    
    
    
    
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF GEM RELATED ARTICLES
                    IV-1
    

    -------
                           BIBLIOGRAPHY OF GEM RELATED ARTICLES
    
    
      lt  Application of Light Transmissometry and Indication Sodium Ion Measurement
               To Continuous Participate Monitoring In The Pulping Industry.   NCASI
               Technical Bulletin No.  79.May 1975.
    
    :- 2.  Avetta,  Edward D.  In-Stack Transmissometer  Evaluation  and Application  to
    r          Particulate Opacity Measurement.   EPA  Contract No.  68-02-0660.
               Owens,  Illinois.   NTIS   PB 242402.   January 1975.
    
      3.  Baladi,  Emile.  Manual Source Testing and Continuous Monitoring
               Calibrations at the Lawrence Energy Center of  Kansas Power and  Light
               Company.   Midwest Research Institute.   EPA Contract No.  68-02-0228.
               EPA Report No.  73-SPP-3.  May 7,  1976.
    
      4.  Beeson,  H.  G.  Continuous Monitoring Excess  Emission Report;   Evaluation
               and Summary.   Entropy Environmentalists,  Inc.   EPA  Contract No.
               68-01-4148, Task 59.  June 1979.
    
      5.  Beeson,  H.  G.  Evaluation of  Continuous Monitoring Excess Emission Reports
               and Validation of Report Data.  Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.   EPA
               Contract  No.  68-01-4148, Task 45.  March 1979.
    
      6.  Cheney,  J.  L.  and J. B. Homolya.  "The Development  of  a  Sulfur Dioxide
               Continuous Monitor Incorporating a Peizo-Electric Sorption Detector,"
               The Science of the Total Environment,  vol. 5,  p.  69-77,  1976.
    
      7.  Cline,  J.  R.,  et.  al.   Compilation and Analysis of  State Regulations for
               S02,  NOy, Opacity, Continuous Monitoring and Applicable  Test Methods:
               Executive Summary and Volumes I,  II, and III.   Engineering Sciences
               Inc.   EPA Contract No.  68-01-4146,  Task 40. EPA  Report  No. 340/
               1-78-009  a, b,  c, d. July 1978.
    
      8.  Connor,  William D.  "A Comparison Between In-Stack  and Plume  Opacity
               Measurements at Oil-Fired Power Plants," presented  at the Fourth
               National  Conference on  Energy and the  Environment in Cincinnati,  Ohio,
               October 4-7,  1976.
    
      9.  Connor,  William D.  Measurement of the Opacity and  Mass  Concentration  of
               Particulate  Emissions  by Transmissometry.  Chemistry and Physics
               Laboratory.  EPA-650/2-74-128.  November 1974.
    
      10. Connor,  W."D.  and J. R. Hodkinson.  Optical Properties and Visual Effects  of
               Smoke-Stack Plumes.  EPA Publication AP-30, second  printing. May 1972.
    
      11. Curtis,  Foston.   "A Method for Analyzing NOX Cylinder  Gases,  Specific  Ion
               Electrode Procedure," Source Evaluation Society Newsletter, February
               1979.   (Study done for  Emission Measurement Branch, US EPA, October
               1978.)
    
      12. Decker,  C.  E., R.  W. Murdoch, and F. K.  Arey.  Final Report on Analysis  of
               Commercial Cylinder Gases of Nitric Oxide and  Sulfur Dioxide at Source
               Concentrations.  EPA Contract No. 68-02-2725.   February 1979.
    
                                           IV-2
    

    -------
     13.   "Environmental Monitoring."  Transcript of Science Technical Hearings, 95
              Congress  1 Serial 44,  September 13-15, 1977.
    
     14.   Fennelly,  Paul F.   Development of an Implementation Plan for a Continuous
              Monitoring Program.   GCA Corporation.   March 1977.
    
     15.   Gregory, M. W.,  et.  al.   "Determination of the Magnitude of S02, NO,
              CC>2 Stratification in the Ducting of Fossil Fuel Fired Power Plants,"
              Paper  76-35.6  presented at the 1976 APCA Meeting, Portland, Oregon.
    
    '16.   Herget, W.  F., et.  al.   "Infrared Gas-Filter Correlation Instrument for
              In-Site Measurement  of Gaseous Pollutant Concentrations," Applied
              Optics, vol.  15:1222-1228, May 1976.
    
     17.   Homolya, J. B.  "Current Technology for Continuous Monitoring of Gaseous
              Emissions," Journal  of the Air Pollution Control Association, vol. 24,
              no. 8,  p.  809-814, August 1975.
    
     18.   Jahnke, James  A.  and G.  J. Aldina.  Continuous Air Pollution Source
              Monitoring Systems;   Handbook.  Northrup Services, Inc.  EPA
              625/6-79-005.June  1979.
    
     19.   Jaye,  Frederic C.   Monitoring Instrumentation for the Measurement of Sulfur
              Dioxide in Stationary Source Emissions.  TRW Systems Group.  EPA
              Project 17205,  NTIS  PB 220202.
    
     20.   Karels, Gale  G.,  et. al.  Use of Real-Time Continuous Monitors in Source
              Testing.   Paper 75-19.5 presented at APCA Annual Meeting, June 15-20,
              1975.   NTIS PB 230934/AS GPO.
    
     21.   Lillis, E.  J.  and  J. J.  Schueneman.  "Continuous Emission Monitoring:
              Objectives and Requirements," Journal of the Air Pollution Control
              Association, vol.  25,  no. 8, August 1975.
    
     22.   Lord III,  Harry C.   "In-Stack Monitoring of Gaseous Pollutants,"
              Engineering Science  and Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, p.  264-69, March
              1978.
    
     23.   McRanie, Richard D., John M. Craig, and George 0. Layman.  Evaluation of
              Sample Conditioners  and Continuous Stack Monitors for Measurement of
              SO?, NOY,  and  Opacity in Flue Gas.  Southern Services,  Inc.  February
              1975.
    
     24.   McNulty, K. J.,  et.  al.   Investigation of Extractive Sampling Interface
              Parameters.  Walden  Research Division of Abcor, Inc.  EPA Contract No.
              68-02-0742.  EPA 650/2-74-089.  October 1974.
    
     25.   Nader,  John S.,  Frederic Jaye, and William Connor.  Performance
              Specifications for Stationary Source Monitoring Systems for Gases and
              Visible Emissions.   NERC Chemistry and Physics Laboratory.  NTIS PB
              209190.   January 1974.
    
     26.  Osborne, Michael C.  and M.  R. Midgett.  Survey of Continuous Source Emission
              Monitors;   Survey No.  1 - Nov and SO?.  EPA 600/4-77-022.  April 1977.
                                       IV-3
    

    -------
     27.  Osborne,  Michael C.  and M. Rodney Midgett.  Survey of Transmissometers Used
              in Conducting Visible Emissions Training' Courses.   EPA - 600/4-78-023.
              May 1978.
    
     28.  Peeler, James W.  Continuous Opacity and Particulate Emissions Monitoring in
              the Federal Republic of Germany;  Selected Papers  From Current
    :          Literature.  Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.   EPA Contract No.
    
     29.  Reisraan,  E.,  W.  D. Gerber, and N. d. Potter.  In-Stack Transmissometer
              Measurement of Particulate Opacity and Mass Concentration.  Philco-Ford
              Corporation.  EPA Contract No. 68-02-1229.  NTIS PB 239864/AS.
              November 1974.
    
     30.  Repp, Mark.   Evaluation of Continuous Monitors for CO in Stationary Sources.
              EPA 600/2-77-063.  March 1977.
    
     31.  Rhodes, Raymond C. and H. Seymour.  "Challenges of Implementing Quality
              Assurance in Air Pollution Monitoring Systems," presented at APCA
              Quality Assurance in Air Pollutiong Measurement Conference, March
              11-14,  1979, New Orleans, Louisiana.
    
     32.  Roberson, R.  L., et. al.  "Continuous Emission In the Electric Utility
              Industry," Paper 80-42.1 presented at APCA Annual Meeting, June 22-27,
              1980, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
    
     33.  Shigehara, R. T.  "Sampling Location for Gaseous Pollutant Monitoring in
              Coal-Fired Power Plants," Source Evaluation Society Newsletter.  July
              1978.
    
     34.  Stanley,  Jon and Peter R. Westlin.  "An Alternative Method for Stack Gas
              Moisture Determination," Source Evaluation Society Newsletter.
              November 1978.
    
     35.  Tomaides, M.   Instrumentation for Monitoring the Opacity of Particulate
              Emissions Containing Condensed Water.  EPA 600/2-77-005.  June 1979.
    
     36.  Tretter,  V.  J.  and Matthew Gould.   "A New Concept In Compliance Monitoring,"
              presented at TAPPI Environmental Conference, April 25-27, 1979,
              Houston, Texas.
    
     37.  United States Environmental Protection Agency.  "Standards of Performance
              for New Stationary Sources," Federal Register 40:46250-70.  October 6,
              1975. "
    
     38.  Van Acker, P-  "Continuous and Semi-Continuous Measurements of Dust
              Emissions In a Power Plant Burning Fuel Oil," Environmental
              International,  vol. 2, no. 2,  p. 107.  1979.
    
     39.  West, P-  W. ,  D.  L. McDermott, and K. D. Reiszner.  "Development of Long-
              Term Sulfur Dioxide Monitor Using Permeation Sampling," Engineering
              Science and Technology, vol.  13, no. 9, September 1979.
                                        IV-4
    

    -------
     40.  Westlin,  Peter R.  and John W.  Brown.   "Methods for Collecting and Analyzing
              Gas  Cylinder  Samples,"  Source Evaluation Society Newsletter, September
              1978.
    
     41.  Woffinden and Ensor.   Optical Method for Measuring the Mass Concentration of
              Particulate Emissions.  Meteorology Research, Inc.  EPA Contract No.
    :          68-02-1749.   EPA 600/2-76-062.   March 1976.
                                       IV-5
    

    -------
                          Availability  of EPA  Publications
    
    
        Copies of United States EPA  publications  are available  free  of  charge, as
    
    long as supplies last, from the  EPA Library  in Research Triangle Park, North
    
    Carolina.  When supplies are  exhausted,  one  may purchase publications from the
    
    United States Government Printing Office or  the National Technical  Information
    
    Service.
                        U.  S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                        Library  (MD-35)
                        Research Triangle  Park,  N.  C. 27711
                        commercial  phone 919-541-2777
                        FTS phone  629-  2779
                         National  Technical Information  Service
                         U.  S.  Department  of Commerce
                         5285  Port Royal Road
                         Springfield,  Virginia   22151
                         phone 703-487-4600
                         Superintendent  of  Documents
                         Government  Printing Office
                         Washington,  D.  C.  20402
                                          IV-6
    

    -------
                                        TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                                 (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
    1. REPORT NO.
       EPA 34n/]-ai-nn«
                  3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
    4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
       Regulations and Resource  File of Continuous
       Monitoring Information
                                                                 6. REPORT DATE, „„ ,
                                                                    October, 1981
                  6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
    7. AUTHOR(S)
    
       WilS.am J.  Pate
                  8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
    9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
          * **.     .
    
       Kilkelly Environmental  Associates, Inc.
       Post Office Box 31265
       Raleigh,  North Carolina 27622
                  1O. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                  11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
    
                    68-01-6317
    12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
       U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
       Office  of  Enforcement
       Office  of  General Enforcement
       Washington.  D. C. 20460
                  13.
                                   D PERIOD COVERED
                  14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
    15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
    16. ABSTRACT
           The  Environmental  Protection Agency  has  promulgated continuous emission
       monitoring requirements  for several NSPS source categories.   The EPA has also
       required states to revise their SIPs  to  include continuous  emission monitoring
       regulations.
    
           This report is a compilation of the  following continuous  emission moni-
       toring information:  EPA regional continuous monitoring contacts;  continuous
       emission monitoring regulations; vendors of  continuous monitoring equipment;
       and a bibliography of  continuous monitoring  literature.
    17.
                                     KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                      DESCRIPTORS
                                                   b.lOENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                c. COS AT I Field/Group
       Continuous Emission Monitoring
       Regu-lations
       New Source Performance Standards
      Continuous  Emission
      Monitoring
    13B
    
    14D
    18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
    
    
      Release Unlimited
      .,SECURITY.CJ,ASS (This Report)
      Unclassified
                                                                                21. NO. OF
                                                                                          ;ES
    20. SECURITY CLASS {Thispage}
      Unclassified
                                22. PRICE
    EPA Porn 2220-1 (R»«. 4-77)    Previous EDITION n OBSOLETE
    

    -------