United States
                          Environmental Protection
                          Agency
                   Air and Radiation
                   6202J
EPA 430-N-94-014
December 1994
&EPA
Green   Lights
Update
                                                                     i tKA
                                                                    /(Green
                                                                     Lights
 Inside...
Computers Conference 	
Energy Star Showcase
Buildings Update..
Lighting-Related
Articles 	
Financing Options
for Your Upgrades
Compact
Fluorescents 	
Green Lights Welcomes
New Particioants ...
2
3
3
4
6
8
                          The 100 Percent Club (companies with entire product lines Energy Star compliant}. Represented (l-r):
                          CTX (2), Hewlett-Packard, Mary D. Nichols, EPA, USA Teknik (2), Samsung (2), and Optiquest. Not pic-
                          tured: MAG Innovision.
 Calendar of
BHIH^^^HHI^H . S | ^J
University of
Michigan Hospitals ....
Upgrade Projects
Reported in August 	
Implementation
Report Form 	
Software
Corner 	
Implementation
Snanshot

11
	 11
	 13
15
15

Jeff Webb, Program Manager of
Computer/Monitor Equipment at | 	 |
EPA. speaks to conference attendees Lef; Mark Sll//im,, rSA rebuilt ill. Josh Chenuki. ICE.
on highlights of the Energy Star and Doh Bytngfon, rSA Teknikin took otvr the touvsl
Computers program. f, Recycled/Recyclable
                                  TA .C) Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on paper that
                                      contains at least 50% recycled fiber

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
continued from page 1
    "Most  major computer
equipment manufacturers world-
wide now offer Energy Star
models," stated Linda Latham,
Director of the Energy Star
Programs  at EPA. "This demon-
strates that the industry has
risen to the challenge  to design
energy-efficient equipment.
These  companies truly deserve
credit for  making Energy Star a
standard feature in their product
designs and in helping to pre-
vent pollution."
    The first annual Energy Star
Computers Awards were present-
ed by Mary D. Nichols, EPA
Assistant Administrator for Air
and  Radiation, to "notable stars'
whose accomplishments merited
special recognition (see box).
The  new Fax  Machine program
takes effect July 1, 1995.
    Among the issues  highlight-
ed at the confer-
ence were  some
Energy Star
Computer
achievements.
•  Forty percent
of PCs and 85
percent of print-
ers sold in  the
U.S. between July
1993 and June
1994 were Energy
Star compliant.
•  Eleven compa-
nies are shipping
Energy Star
Pentiums (Caliber Computer, Dell,
Digital, Everex, Fountain
Technologies, Gateway, IBM,
Mass Research, Packard Bell,
Unisys, and Zenith Data Systems).
•  Companies committed to
buying Energy Star Computers:
Bell Communications Research;
Carrier Corporation;
         1994  Energy Star Computers Awards
   Category
   Most Creative Ad Campaign
   Greatest Logo Visibility
   Most User-Friendly Power Management
   PCs: Lowest Power Energy Star
   Technological Innovation
   PCs: 100 Percent Energy Star Sales
   Printers: 100 Percent of Product Line
   Monitors: 100  Percent of Product Line
     and Highest Percentage of Sales
   Monitors: 100  Percent of Product Line

   Printers: Highest Percentage of Sales
              . . -
   PCs: Highest Percentage of Sale
   PCs: Highest Pen
   Honorable Merrt
     OutstSromg Program Contribu
               Winner
             NANAO
            LEXMARK
             COMPAQ
           USA TEKNIK
             CANON
           USA TEKNIK
      HEWLETT-PACKARD
       MAG INNOVISION
               CTX
           OPTIQUEST
            SAMSUNG
            LEXMARK
              OMPAQ
             ETT-PACKARD
Chdilcr Members of the Energ\' Star Fax Machine program (l-r) Linda
Latham. EPA. Crane Dandridge. Program Manager fur Imaging Equipment,
EPA: Vicki Stmuss, Toshiba: Dennis McGaris and Hal Phillips. Hewlett-
Packard: Joe Rooney, Minolta: and David Fan: Canon-USA.
                Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN;
                New York Power Authority;
                Shaw Industries; Southern
                California Edison; Suffolk
                County,  NY; State of California;
                SUNY/Buffalo; U.S.  Government;
                Warner-Lambert.
                    John Hoffman, Director of
                EPA's Global Change Division,
                sees Energy Star Computers as a
                cooperative way to  decrease
                energy demand at a time when
                buildings systems and office
                equipment  require increasing
                amounts of energy.  "The Energy
                Star program is already a sym-
                bol of success....This is a non-
                bureaucratic, voluntary program
                that's creating  energy-efficient
                technology at no  cost—or low
                cost—and improving products,"
                said Hoffman.
                    For more information  about
                joining the Energy Star Computers
                program or purchasing Energy
                Star equipment, please call the
                Green Lights Energy Star Hotline
                at 202 775-6650. H

-------
                                                                 GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
Energy  Star Showcase  Buildings  Update
    Building on Green Lights'
success, the Energy Star
Buildings program focuses on
energy-efficient investments for
U.S. commercial buildings. Using
proven technologies, its five-
stage implementation process
takes advantage of system inter-
actions, enabling building own-
ers to achieve additional energy
savings while lowering capital
expenditures. With the accelerat-
ed 1-year Showcase Buildings
program due for completion in
July 1995, the Update will report
regularly on the progress  of
sample projects. This month fea-
tures Douglas County Judiciary
Center in Roseberg, OR.
    "We're utilizing lighting color
and wall color to create a  'warm
atmosphere, because the same
temperature can feel warm or
cool based  on room color," says
John Walker, Green Lights
Implementation Director, who
expects to be done before April
1995. Walker and the staff, who
manage the 250,000 square foot
Energy Star Showcase Building,
have installed 3500 Kelvin light-
ing and repainted some walls in
order to make the building "feel
warm" without raising the  tem-
perature. Walker believes in
using the latest technology and
techniques to maintain lighting
and atmospheric quality.
    With the technical support of
Green Lights Manufacturer Ally
and fellow Showcase Partner
Honeywell,  Inc., Douglas County
installed an energy management
system (EMS) to monitor temper-
atures and up-to-the minute
equipment operation to enhance
energy efficiency. Tied into EMS
are upgraded fan and air han-
dling systems, allowing EMS to
optimize the efficiency of these
systems, which consume more
than  10 percent of total energy in
the facility. The EMS  also has
direct digital control to monitor
and fine-tune heating and cooling
throughout the building. The out-
side air ventilation system, also
controlled by EMS, releases fresh
air according to ASHRAE stan-
dards 68-89 of 20 CFM per per-
son based on occupancy.
   A new roof has eliminated
leaks and improved efficiency. By
laying down 3-inch thick adhe-
sive foam membranes, applying
spray foam, rolling out inner tube
material, and then painting a
thick white reflective  sealant coat-
ing on top, the roofs insulating
properties were doubled.
   Occupancy sensors tied into
EMS's timing system will match
lighting and HVAC levels to occu-
pancy schedules. Already operat-
ing in several sections of the
Judiciary Center, an electronic
card system must be used by
employees to activate lighting and
HVAC systems in a given room
"after hours"—a supervisor
receives a bill for the unscheduled
space/time used. Unscheduled
occupancy has declined where
the cards are in use.
    The variable speed drive and
off-line uninterrupted power sup-
ply (UPS) system projects are
already underway. The UPS,
which restores lost power instan-
taneously, will  save  $3,000 annu-
ally because, like Energy Star
Computers, it powers down until
needed, reducing electricity
usage and  heat generation. The
Center has reduced energy con-
sumption by over 50 percent in
the past 4 years, and the monthly
energy bill has gone from
$24,000 to  $11,000 since it
became a pioneer Energy Star
Showcase Building.  H
               Lighting-Related
               Articles
               "Green Lights: The Year of Implementation,"
                 Building Operating Management, September
                 1994, pp. 72-104.
               "Quest for Sales," Lighting Design & Application,
                 September 1994, pp. 22-26.
               "Lighting the Path to an Energy-Efficient Future,"
                 Buildings, September 1994, pp. 54-56.

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
Financing Options
for  Your  Upgrades
    In the pursuit of higher
quality, more energy-efficient
lighting systems, Green Lights
Partners and Allies have been
pushing through proposals for
comprehensive upgrades. What
senior management wants to
know is:  How are we going to
pay for this work?
    Numerous financing options
are available to fund energy-effi-
cient upgrades. The financing
method you select should take
into consideration a variety of
organization-specific factors, such
as company size, existing debt
capacity,  in-house expertise
level, and risk tolerance. The
major financing options are
described below, including bene-
fits and drawbacks, to help you
select the method most appropri-
ate to your organization's needs.
    To illustrate the issues in-
volved with some of these financ-
ing options, we'll use an example:
XYZ Corp. plans to install a  $1
million energy-efficient lighting
system that will yield $340,000 in
annual energy cost savings.
    Turn-Key Purchase

   This is a simple cash pur-
chase. XYZ Corp. would realize
a payback period of 2.9 years
(initial investment of $1 mil-
lion/annual energy cost savings
of $340,000) and an internal rate
of return of 34 percent over a
20-year horizon. This  method is
good for cash-rich organizations
eager to avoid debt. You enjoy
100 percent of the energy sav-
ings stream from the start, plus
the depreciation tax shelter on
equipment; however,  you
assume the energy savings risk,
and funding for lighting
upgrades is not available for
other projects.

   Cash Purchase with
     Utility Incentives:
 Establish Revolving Fund
   Often it is possible to sup-
plement your cash investment
with  funding provided by your
local utility. Many utilities offer
cash  rebates and demand-side
management (DSM) contracts
that can lower project costs up
to 40 percent. Rebates are
straight cash back on  equipment
purchased, and DSM contracts
offer cash back for measured
electric load reductions.  DSM
contracts may require you to
work with an energy service
company (ESCO)—lighting pro-
fessionals who can accurately
monitor and measure  energy sav-
ings.  The Green Lights Financing
Directory,  a computerized listing
of all known major utility rebate
programs in the U.S.,  is  available
through the Green Lights/Energy
Ten-Year Revolving Reinvestment Fund Strategy (in dollars)
Bj|P**ip
Rebate (25% of investment) 37,500
,,,„,, . a. 	
Annual Savings (2 1 % of investment) 3 1 ,500
Cumulative Investment
(cash + rebates) 1 87,500
Cumulative Annual Savings
Available for Reinvestment 3 1 ,500-
|
7,875
6,615

226,875

38,115
H
9,529
8,004

274,5 1 9

46,1 19
H
1 1,530
9,685

332,168

55,804-
imi
13,951
11,719

401,923

67,523
16,881
14,180

486,327

81,703
H
20,426
17,158

588,455

98,860
mm
24,715
20,761

712,031

119,621-
29,905
25,120

861,557

144,742-
> 144,742
36,185
30,396

1,042,484

175,137

-------
                                                                  GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
Star  Hotline at 202 775-6650. It
also  provides names of third-
party financing companies for
lighting upgrades.
   If you want to minimize
cash outlays, you  can establish
a revolving reinvestment fund,
whereby energy savings from
the first round of upgrades
fund later upgrades. To see
how this works, let's examine
the same upgrade project that
requires $1 million to complete
and  yields $340,000 in annual
electric bill savings. Using a
combination of rebates (XYZ
can  recover approximately 25
percent of cash invested each
year) and careful reinvestment
of savings  (XYZ estimates  21
cents in energy cost savings per
dollar invested), XYZ can
finance the project with very
little cash.  If XYZ  Corp.  invests
15 percent up  front ($150,000),
it could complete  the project in
10 years with that small initial
investment (see chart on page
4). As energy savings increase,
more upgrade  funding becomes
available.  This financing
method requires a detailed
measurement and  verification
plan to monitor energy savings
and  separate those savings from
normal electric bill fluctuations
(see  table at  right).
   This method is good for
organizations with limited cash.
You  enjoy 100 percent of the
energy savings  stream from the
start, plus the depreciation  tax
shelter; however, you assume
the energy  savings risk, and
Upgrade Financing Sources (by %)
Internal Funds
Conventional Loans
Utility Funds
Lease/Lease-Purchases
Shared Savings
Other
N/A
Mfg. = Manufacturer Ally; LMC
Corp.
71
1
5
1
1
4
17
~ Lighting Mana
State
29
0
21
17
5
26
\
Participant Type
City Mfg. LMC
31
0
45
18
2
3
2
76
1
2
2
0
2
18
Cement Company Ally: (Jtil.
84
0
2
0
0
2
12
Util.
92
0
1
0
0
0
7
= Utility Ally; Dist.
Dist.
71
5
0
0
0
5
18
All
70
1
6
2
1
5
15
= Distributor Ally
funding for lighting upgrades is
not available for other projects.

    Conventional Loan
    If bank financing is avail-
able, loan payments can be
structured to be slightly lower
than projected energy savings.
Banks usually require a down
payment. This financing method
is good for organizations with
borrowing ability. It minimizes
your cash outlay at the start,
and the loan is repaid through
your energy savings. After the
loan is repaid, you reap 100
percent of the energy savings
stream and benefit from the
depreciation tax shelter as well
as the loan's interest expense
tax shelter; however, you
assume  energy  savings risk, and
funding for lighting upgrades is
not available for other projects.

       Capital Lease

    Most lighting contractors and
ESCOs offer installment financ-
ing that is essentially a capital
lease. Like a conventional  loan,
payments can be slightly lower
than projected energy savings. A
capital lease requires a buyout
(purchase option) at lease's
term. This arrangement is attrac-
tive because it requires no
money down and, after the buy-
out, you  enjoy the entire savings
stream. You benefit from the
depreciation and interest
expense tax shelters; however,
you assume the energy savings
risk, and the lease is treated like
debt on your balance sheet. As
a landlord, you cannot pass
through to tenants upgrade costs
financed  with a capital lease,
because they are typically  con-
sidered capital improvements.

     Operating Lease

   Some financial institutions
and ESCOs offer operating leas-
es (usually for energy-efficient
building systems instead of just
lighting). The ESCO maintains
ownership of the installed
equipment, and your organiza-
tion makes monthly lease  pay-
ments out of energy savings
realized.  At the lease's term,
you renew the lease, purchase
the equipment, or return it to
the ESCO.
   This option is attractive
because it requires no money
              continued on page 7

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
Compact  Fluorescents:
In  Demand  for All the  Right Reasons
    Compact fluorescent lamps
should be on every Green Lights
participant's most wanted list.
The practical and aesthetic fea-
tures of today's high-quality,
energy-efficient compact fluores-
cents have created strong
demand. When labor, energy,
and materials are factored, com-
pact fluorescents can save 65 to
75 percent in lighting costs (see
Figure  1). Compared with incan-
descent lamps, they generate
three to four times more lumens
per watt and have a rated lamp
life 10  times longer—one of the
more lucrative Green Lights
investments.
    Compact fluorescent lamps
come in a variety of shapes,
       sizes, and wattages, making
       incandescent retrofits easier than
       ever before. Their excellent
       color rendering index of 80 or
       higher nearly duplicates that of
       incandescent lamps.

          Compact Fluorescent
               Applications
           Retrofit compact fluorescent
       lamps are offered as modular
       units (replaceable lamps with a
       screwbase adaptor and ballast),
       or integral units ^fluorescent
       lamps with a screwbase adaptor,
       ballast, and lamp all in one
       unit). With modular units, you
       can replace lamps three to four
       times without changing ballasts.
    Twin-Tube
              Downlights
    Triple-Twin-
    Tube and
    Quad-Tube
     Integral
   Ballast Lamp
    Circline &
     Square
    Reflector
      Unit
©
Surface
 Lights
Pendant
Fixtures
Track
Lights
                                                       Sconces
            Excellent
                          Suitable
               Not
               recommended
                   If a reflector is not Integrated in
                   fixture, reflector unit would be
                   a better lamp application.
Both are available with magnetic
or electronic ballasts. The fol-
lowing applications offer a vari-
ety of features.
    Twin-tube compact fluores-
cents—the most common appli-
cation, twin tubes can retrofit
exit signs, ceiling fixtures, and
sconces  because of their tall,
slender  form. But their length
creates some  limitations. For
example, when retrofitted base-
up in a  recessed downlight, they
can appear unsightly and create
glare.
    Quad-tube and triple-twin-
tube compact fluorescents—
designed to reduce lamp length
while maintaining lumen output,
the triple-twin-tube and triple-U-
_______________    tube are the most
             compact fluores-
             cent lamps—
             quadruple- twin-
             tubes are expect-
             ed soon. These
             lamps suit down-
             lights and track
             lights with reflec-
             tors, as well as
             pendant fixtures
             and table lamps.
                Circline and
             square compact
             fluorescents—
             designed for table
             lamp applications,
             circline and
             square-shaped
             compact fluores-

-------
                                                                     GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
 continued from page 5
 clown, the lease is not recorded
 as debt on your balance sheet,
 and payments are tax deductible
 as operating expenses;  however,
 you assume the energy savings
 risk. Operating leases can be
 tricky to structure, so you need
 to work with  an experienced
 financial partner. As a landlord,
 you can pass  through to tenants
 upgrade costs financed  with an
 operating lease, because they are
 classified as operating expenses.
   Performance Contract

    Under this unique arrange-
 ment, an ESCO installs a lighting
 upgrade and XYZ Corp. agrees  to
 pay a percentage of the measured
 energy cost savings each month
 until the project cost is recovered.
 It no savings occur, XYZ Corp.'s
 monthly payment is suspended.
    This option  is ideal for most
 organizations provided they have
 the flexibility to work with third-
 party installers. Performance con-
Overview of Four Most Common Financing Options
Initial Payment
Periodic
Payments
Payment Source
Performance Risk
Contract
Termination
Optionsf
Ownership
Tax Deductions§
'" Owner's risk may be
f At end of term.
§ Sub/ect to change in
Cash
Purchase
1 00% of
project cost
none
capital
owner: 100%*
N/A
building owner
depreciation
reduced with guaranteed
tax laws. Consult with la
Conventional
Financing
0-30% of
project cost
fixed
capital
owner: 100%*
principal payoff
building owner
depreciation and
interest
savings insurance
. advisor regarding
Capital
Lease
$0 or deposit
fixed
capital
owner: 100%*
principal payoff
building owner
depreciation
and interest
eligibility.
Shared
Savings
$0
percentage of
energy cost savings
operations
investor: 100%
fair market value
buyout, renew, or
return
investor
shared savings
payments

 tracts require no money down,
 energy savings are guaranteed by
 the contractor, and contract pay-
 ments are deductible as operat-
 ing expenses. You have modest
 positive cash flow from day one
 through leftover energy savings,
 after which you enjoy the entire
 savings stream. Working with  an
 ESCO also provides a  high level
 of technical expertise and experi-
 ence with energy-efficient equip-
 ment. An ESCO could help you
 identify savings opportunities
       you did not know exist.
           Performance contracts
       can be tricky to structure,
       so you should obtain good
       information on how to
       arrange these contracts.
       EPA's Green Lights techni-
       cal staff has assembled  a
       booklet on Requests for
       Proposals and Requests for
       Quotes that provides valu-
       able information on this
       type of financing. Call the
       Green Lights/Energy Star
       Hotline at 202 775-6650 to
       request a copy. PR
continued from page 6
cents also suit  low-profile
sconces  and shallow ceiling fix-
tures; square compact fluores-
cents provide better color
rendering.
    Reflector units—these pro-
vide a wide flood beam for uni-
form illumination, but compact
fluorescents are still  a linear light
source, making optic control a
challenge. These lamps work
best in recessed downlights in
ceilings less than 15' high and in
track lights when tight beam
control is not needed.

 Retrofit Considerations

    Although compact fluores-
cent retrofits are great success-
es,  they do raise application
issues. For example, not all
incandescent fixtures can han-
dle other lamps. The following
issues should be considered
before upgrading:
    Size. Shape and size vary, so
certain compact  fluorescents
work better in certain applica-
tions. Check manufacturer data
for  lamp/adaptor dimensions to
ensure proper fitting.
    Dimmability. Current screw-
base (retrofit) compact fluores-
cents cannot be  dimmed—
dimmers must be replaced with
switches to  upgrade properly.
             continued on page 10

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
Green  Lights Welcomes

New  Participants
    Green Lights welcomes 24 new participants
who joined in September to take advantage of the
benefits of energy-efficient lighting upgrades.
    Siemens Rolm Communications, a telecommu-
nications manufacturer, has committed its manufac-
turing plants, R&D labs, and sales offices to Quick
Start, which involves a kickoff meeting and demon-
stration project within 180 days of signing the
Memorandum of Understanding. Rolm's demonstra-
tion project, a new 10,000 square foot R&D lab at
its Santa Clara, CA, headquarters, will use T-8
lamps and electronic ballasts preferred by employ-
ees. "We're all thrilled with this project—it benefits
the environment and saves money,  too," says Tracy
Egeness, Green  Lights Implementation Director
(GLID) and Environmental Associate Engineer.
    BIC Corporation, based in Milford, CT, has
joined Green Lights "to take advantage of the
expertise and make sure we're doing it right," says
Kenneth Brannin, GLID and Director of Plant
Services. Known for its pens, shavers, and lighters,
BIC is surveying and will upgrade 1.3 million
square  feet of facilities in three states. BIC had
used high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamps since
1982 to improve color rendering—extremely
important in manufacturing plastic components.
Metal halide lamps, which provide even better
color rendering, have been installed in newer
plants and will be used to upgrade HPS lamps.
   With a $10 million electric utility budget and
over 500 facilities, Fulton County has joined Green
Lights because it "needs to control energy
growth," says Jim Winslett, GLID and Energy
Management Engineer, Dept. of Public Buildings.
Winslett developed a design standard involving
energy-efficient lighting for new construction and
renovations, and he plans to install daylight
switching, T-8s, and electronic ballasts in upgrade
projects. Fulton County seeks the Green Lights
tools and reporting system to help implement
upgrades and document progress: "They're time
savers." Employees will  receive Green Lights litera-
ture and tour demonstration upgrades.
   Green Lights looks forward to working with its
new participants. For more information about Green
Lights, please contact the Hotline at 202 775-6650. PI
                                        Partners (14)
  Allen Memorial Hospital  • BIC Corporation • Eastalco Aluminum Company • Epson Portland Inc.
  I Fulton County (GA) • Loews Annapolis Hotel •  Mercy Fitzgerald Medical Center •  Mercy Memorial
   Hospital •  National Naval Medical Center •  Rochester Community School Corporation  • Rolm, A
          Siemens Company • UAV •  US Naval Academy • Wasatch County School District

                                          Allies (4)
           Electro-Tech's • Energy Group Management, Inc. • Energy Planning Associates
                              •  Litemore  Distributors of Boston Ltd.

                                       Endorsers (6)
          The American  Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.
        • Business for Social Responsibility  • Concern, Inc. • Minnesota Hospital Association
                   • New Mexico Hospital  Association • The Wagner Group, Inc.

-------
                                                           GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
Calendar of
Lighting-Related Events
World Energy
Engineering Congress
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contort: Ted Kurklis, 404 925-9648
Date: December 7-9, 1994
Illuminating Engineering Society of
North America's (IESNA) 1995
LIGHTFAIR
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact: AMC Tradeshows,
  404220-2215
Date: May 23-25, 1995
Lighting Efficiency Congress
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact: Debbie Fernandez,
 Association of Energy Engineers,
 404 279-4386
Date: April 19-20, 1995
Illuminating Engineering Society
of North America (IESNA) Annual
Conference
Location: New York, NY
Contact: Valerie Landers,
  212248-5000, ext. 117
Date: July 29-August 3, 1995
| International Association of
j Lighting Management
 Companies' (NALMCO)
 42nd Annual Convention
I Location: Nashville, TN
1 Contact: Jennifer Busch, 609 799-5501
I Date: April 30-May 2, 1995
 Green Lights
  Workshops
 are listed on
   the back
 page of this
   Update.
 EPA Introduces Consolidated
 Green Lights/Energy Star Hotline

    Effective November 1, 1994, the U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency will operate a single comprehensive
 hotline to answer any questions you have about the
 Green Lights/Energy Star programs. The Green
 Lights/Energy Star Hotline's customer service staff is
 trained to answer questions, provide technical assis-
 tance and software support, process material requests,
 and accept registrations for Lighting Upgrade
 Workshops.
    The Hotline is available Monday through Friday
 with newly extended hours—8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
 (ET). For Partners  in Green Lights, this hotline is
      *
 intended  to supplement support services.
 Green Lights/Energy Star Hotline
 Phone Number	
 .202 77S-66SO
 Green Lights/Energy Star Hotline
 FAX Number	
 .202 775-6680
                Extended Hotline Hours:
     Monday-Friday 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Eastern Time)
             Wishing
                you and
                 your
                 family
                 a  happy
           holiday
              r
                                   EPA'fi Green Lights
                                   Program Staff

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
continued from page 7
Failure to do so is a fire hazard.
Dimmable compact fluorescent
systems exist, but they usually
require a  new luminaire, includ-
ing a dimmable ballast, four-pin
compact fluorescent lamp, and
dedicated dimming control.
    Optical efficiency and projection
distance. Fluorescents do not pro-
vide the same optic control as
incandescent or high intensity
discharge lamps. Compact fluo-
rescents with integral reflectors
do not achieve the same projec-
tion distance as most incandes-
cent lamps. Use compact
halogen reflector lamps for
applications requiring greater
projection.
    Orientation and temperature
effects. When positioned base-up
or horizontal and ambient tem-
perature is approximately 25° C
(77° F), compact fluorescents
provide optimal lumen output.
Enclosing compact fluorescent
lamps in indoor fixtures may
lower lumen output because of
higher ambient temperatures
inside the fixtures. When ambi-
ent temperature drops in cold
regions, outdoor compact fluo-
rescents have lower lumen out-
put and might fail to start.
Consult the manufacturer for
minimum starting temperature
and performance data.
    Harmonic distortion. In a typi-
cal 4-wire, 3-phase power distri-
bution system, harmonic
distortion adds current  to the
neutral wire. Although  electronic
ballasts have a higher effect on
harmonic distribution, "low-har-
monic" ballasts are available.
When compact fluorescents  are
a small part of the electrical
load,  the harmonic current is
diluted. But when compact fluo-
Figure 1. Lighting costs of compact fluorescents compared with incandescents.
a  wo
<  $^o —
                                            ^Costs mc/ude material, tabor and energy costs.
                                            $ I 00 Relompmg Labor (group re/omp)
                                            $ 50 75VV Incandescent A-Lomp (1000 br life)
                                            $15.00 20W Compact fluorescent (10.000 nr life)
                                            $ 07/kVW) Energy Charge
rescents are a large part, specify
low-harmonic electronic ballasts
with less than 30 percent total
harmonic distortion.
    Theft resistance. Some lamps
are now designed with a lock-
ing base option. Unless a spe-
cial tool is used, the lock
prevents the lamp from being
removed from its socket. This
not only prevents theft, it is
ideal for preventing "snap-
back," the  tendency for occu-
pants to replace expired
compact fluorescents with
incandescents.
    Before pursuing any retrofit,
complete a trial installation.
Compact fluorescents will not
always fit incandescent applica-
tions. For example,  screwbase
compact fluorescents have large
adaptors that may not fit in fix-
tures designed for narrow-neck
incandescent lamps. For high
ceilings, a  trial installation will
determine  if a compact fluores-
cent will provide adequate illu-
mination.
    For further information, con-
sult the Lighting Upgrade
Manual and the National
Lighting Product Information
Program Specifier Report on
Screwbase Compact Fluorescent
Lamp Products and its  recent
supplement. To obtain these
publications or other lighting
upgrade information, call the
Green Lights/Energy Star Hotline
at 202 775-6650. If
                        4,000        6,000        8.000
                       Accumulated Hours of Lamp Operation
10

-------
                                                              GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
              University  of  Michigan Hospitals
              Educates  Employees
                  "We found that the link between
              energy conservation and pollution pre-
              vention wasn't always clear. So, our pam-
                  phlet is a tool to explain to
                  employees why University of
                   Michigan Hospitals [UMH] is
                   involved in the Green Lights pro-
                     jects," says Tom Ouvry, UMH
                    Green Lights Implementation
                     Director and Energy Engineer. The
                      Ann Arbor, MI, teaching hospital
                      produced  a 6-page pamphlet to
                       hand out to its 7,500 employees
                       during a Staff Energy Awareness
                        Program, as well as prior to
                        lighting surveys, when height-
                         ening employee awareness
                          increases  support for Green
                          Lights upgrades.  "When
                          employees think of turning
                           off a light as pollution pre-
                      vention rather than saving a few cents for
                      the hospital, they are even more eager to
                      get involved."
                         Inspired by a similar, simpler booklet
                      created by the University of Michigan
                      Housing Department, another Green
                      Lights participant, Ouvry wrote the pam-
                      phlet to explain:
                       • what the Green Lights program is,
                       • why UMH joined Green Lights and is
                         working with EPA to upgrade lighting,
                       • what upgrades save in terms of ener-
                         gy, cost, and pollution, and
                       • what UMH is doing as a Green Lights
                         participant.
                         "The feedback has been tremendous,"
                      says Ouvry of the response to the pamplet.
                      "Heightening awareness even a little bit
                      would have satisfied me, but UMH staff
                      response has been so positive that I expect
                      implementation to be  highly successful." Pi

Upgrade  Projects
Reported  in  September
The following program participants submitted implementation reports on lighting upgrades during September.
Completed Upgrades
AES Corporation, David Burley
Active Electric Supply, Rick Helsel
Advanced Control Technologies, Inc.,
  Jack V. Taylor
Alabama Power Company, Joe Meadow
Amoco, Walter R. Quanstrom
Bechtel, Geoffrey Smith
Boeing, Fay Weaver
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.,
  Dan Frame
Chabot Community College,
  Nick Pereira
Chase Manhattan Corporation,
  EdwardJ. O'Shea
City University of New York,
  Jerold Manner
City of Houston, Texas,
  Dewayne Huckabay
Connetquot Central School District,
  James Marran
Cooper Lighting, Frank Muir
Cox Newspapers, Harold J. Brown
Dura Pharmaceuticals, Dona Stewart
ELBA International, Inc.,
  Alan W. Medak
Eclipse Technologies, Charles Osher
EMS Lighting Management Systems, Inc.,
  WiUiam W. Kelly
Firstar Bank Madison, NA,
  John M. Howe
Gray's Harbor County PUD #1,
  Joanne E. Hansen
Guyco  Corporation,  Roger B. Turner
Hewlett-Packard Co., Robert Lanning

            continued on page 12
                                                                                          11

-------
GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
continued from page 11
Indianapolis Power & Light,
   Ivan K. Charley
International Energy Conservation
   Systems, Richard Jackson
Jantzen, Inc., Scott Perry
Johnson & Johnson, Harry Kauffman
Lithonia Lighting, Mark Ricketson
Liz Claiborne, Inc., Mitchell Bernstein
Lumatech Corp., James O'Carroll
Marion County School District of TN,
   Paul Turney
Midwest Conservation Systems,
   Edward Irvine
Montgomery County, Maryland,
   Homeira Razavi
NYNEX Corporation,
   Roy W, Deitchman
National Semiconductor Corporation,
   Joseph Seward
Northern Arizona University,
   Mark Flynn
Northern Illinois Medical Center,
   John Hadley
Ocean County College, Ken Olsen
Oryx Energy Company, Inc.,
   Robert L. Sullivan
Planned Parenthood of SC Michigan,
   Ron Knutson
Prince William County, Virginia,
   Sharon J. Wise
Shealy Electrical Wholesalers, Inc.,
   Travis Sutton
Southern California Edison  Company,
   Gary Suzuki
St. Luke's Hospital (FL), Bob Taylor
The Catholic University of America,
   Robert Burhenn
The City of Austin,  Fred Yebra
The Home Depot, Jim Laird
The Humane Society of the United
   States, Peter T. Zier
The State of Maryland, Gerald Thorpe
The Washington Times, Joseph Butler
Thomas Industries,  Inc., Joe Kolarik
UNISYS Corporation, Oscar D. Smith
US West, Inc., Walter Williams
USX/US Steel Group, RoyJ. Weiskircher
Union Camp Corporation, Ray Scholten
Unity College, Michael Carstens
Western Area Power Administration,
   George O. Thomas
Westin Hotels & Resorts, Gus Newbury
Whirlpool, Michael Bacon
Wisconsin Electric Power,
   Patty Galante
Woman's World Shops, Inc.,
   Norman Lieberman
 Upgraded Progress Reports
 AES Corporation, David Burley
 ANR Pipeline Company, Stephen Hudik
 Advanced Control Technologies, Inc.,
   Jack V. Taylor
 Alabama Power Company, Joe Meadow
 American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.,
   Andrew Pucher
 American Maize-Products Company,
   David Gajewski
 Amoco, Walter R. Quanstrom
 Armada/Hoffler Real Estate Company,
   Dave Ashley
 Armada/Hoffler Real Estate Company,
   Bruce G. Ford
 BP Exploration - Alaska,
   James Fairbanks
 Bank of Hawaii, John Hashizume
 Belco Electric, Inc., Trannon Thomas
 Boeing, Fay Weaver
 Bright Electrical Supply, Russell Miron
 Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.,
   Dan Frame
 Carr Real Estate Services,  Robert Fowler
 Caterair International, Rich Schinner
 Charming Shoppes, Inc.,
   Richard Carinci
 Chase Manhattan Corporation,
   Edward J. O'Shea
 City University of New York,
   Jerold Marmer
 Community Hospital
   Anderson/Madison Co.,
   John A. Wesley
 Community Medical Center,
   Charles Faella
 Cook County, Illinois, Robert/.  Werner
 Data General Corporation,
   Blair M. Wentworth
 Deeter Lighting, Mark Deeter
 Energy  User News (Chilton Co.),
   George W. Butter
 Geisinger Medical Center,
   William F. McCormick
 Graybar Electric Company,
   William Trussel
 Guardian Corporation,
   Richard H. Wyton
 Guyco Corporation, Roger B. Turner
 Honeywell, Inc., William P. Sikute
 Illuminating Technologies, Robert Hunt
 Indianapolis Power & Light,
   Ivan K. Charley
 Integrated Power & Lites,
   Bryan McLain
 International Institute for  Energy
   Conservation, Russell Sturm
JE Seagram Corporation, Bert Poirier
Jantzen, Inc., Scott Perry
Johnson & Johnson, Harry Kauffman
Leon County, Florida, Jeff Greene
Lithonia Lighting, Mark Ricketson
Medical College of Ohio,
   Harvey Vershum
Moldcast,  Division of USI Lighting,
   Jeff Hunt
NYNEX Corporation,
   Roy W. Deitchman
National Center for Manufacturing
   Sciences, Jackie Willis
Nike, Inc., Jim Petsche
Ocean  County College, Ken Olsen
Omaha Public Power District,
   Marc Nichols
Oryx Energy Company, Inc.,
   Robert  L. Sullivan
Prescolite  - Division of USI Lighting,
   John Taylor
Prince William County, Virginia,
   Sharon J. Wise
Ravenswood Hospital Medical Center,
   Joseph S. Malacina
SPI Lighting, Inc., Dennis Johnson
Spectrum Lighting Technologies,
   Kentjewett
Stambaugh-Thompson, Keith Berlin
The City of Austin, Fred Yebra
The Commonwealth of Virginia,
   O. Gene Dishner
The Home Depot, Jim Laird
The State  of Maryland, Gerald Thorpe
The Washington Times, Joseph Butler
UAV, Richard Job annas
US West, Inc.,  Walter Williams
USA/US Steel Group, RoyJ. Weiskircher
Union Camp Corporation, Ray Scholten
Unity College, Michael Carstens
University of Missouri  at Columbia,
   MarkK. Gulp
University of Rochester,
   Patricia Beaumont
University of Virginia, M.S. Anand
Vista Lighting, Gerald A. Overheu
Wellington Sears Company,
   T. Halliburton Wood
West Chester University, Shari L. Harris
Westin  Hotels & Resorts, Gus Newbury
Westinghouse Electric Company,
   James P. Brennan
Whirlpool, Michael Bacon
Woman's World Shops, Inc.,
   Norman Lieberman
World Vision, John Spurgin
World Wildlife Fund,
   Amelia S. Salzman
12

-------
GREEN   LIGHTS   IMPLEMENTATION   REPORT
                                                                                                         OMB # 2060-0255 Exp. 3/3 1/96


SURVEY REPORT
(fill in sections 1,2,4,6, and 12 below)

COMPLETED PROJECT REPORT
(fill in sections 1-12 below)
Date:
Page of
                                                                                                                (attach additional pages as needed)
1.  FACILITY INFORMATION
Company Name:
Facility Name:
Facility address:
City/St./ZipCode
Facility type*
                          New Construction?
                                          Yes   No
2. LIGHTING FIXTURES BEFORE UPGRADE    r*«M codes on back)
Fixture
Type*
Fixture
Quantity
Lamp
Type*
Lamp
Wattage
Lamps1'
Fixture
                                    Ballast
Lamps
Ballast
Wattage
per Fixture
Lighting
hours year
4. LIGHTING CONTROLS BEFORE UPGRADE
    Type 1*
             Quantity
                            Type 2*
                                     Quantity
                                                 Type 3*
                                                           Quantity
6. MAINTENANCE METHODS BEFORE UPGRADE
    Group relamping?
                  Yes  No    Fixture cleaning?
                                         Yes   No
                                               Facility Manager:
                                               Telephone No./FAX No.
                                               Total Floorspace for this Facility:
                                               Floorspace included in this report:
                                               Is this the FIRST report sent to EPA for this floorspace?
                                                                                                                                 sq.ft.
                                                                                                                                 sq.ft.
                                                                                                    Yes   No
                                                              3. LIGHTING FIXTURES AFTER UPGRADE
                                                                                                          (*use codes on back)
Upgrade
Type*
                                                                              Fixture
Fixture
Quantity
Lamp
Type*
Lamp
Wattage
Lamps
Fixture
                                                                                                                Ballast
Lamps
Ballast
Wattage
per Fixture
Lighting
hours Vear
                                                              5. LIGHTING CONTROLS AFTER UPGRADE
                                                                        Type '*
                                                                                 Quantity
                                                                                               Type 2*
                                                                                                        Quantity
                                                                                                                      Type 3*
                                                                                                                               Quantity
                                                              7. MAINTENANCE METHODS AFTER UPGRADE
                                                  Group relamping?
                                                                 Yes    No   Fixture cleaning?
                                                                                   Yes
                                                                                    No
8. COMMENTS
9. PROJECT COSTS
Survey
Administrative
Materials
Installation Labor
Disposal/Recycling Costs:
Other Costs
Total Project Cost
Rebates/Grants
6200 (93094)
                                          10. LIGHTING SAVINGS
                                         Lighting Load Reduced
                                         Electricity Reduction
                                         % Lighting Savings
                                         Energy Cost Savings
                                         Internal Rate of Return
                                                                             Syr
                                                                                      11. IMPLEMENTATION METHODS:
                                                                            Survey/Analysis*
                                                                            Equipment Provider
                                                                            Installation Method*
                                                                            Financing Method*
                                                                                     use codes on the back for these entries
                                         12. SIGNATURE
                                                                 Are you?    GL Implementation Director
                                                                                                 Facility Manager
                                                                                                            Other
                                         Send to: Jackie Krieger, Green Lights, US-EPA 6202J, 401 M St. SW, Washington DC 20460 , or
                                         FAX to (202) 233-9569.  For questions, call the Green Lights technical hotline: 202-862-1145

-------
 GREEN  LIGHTS  IMPLEMENTATION REPORT CODES
       Facility Type
  1000 Office
  1001 Warehouse
  1002 Industrial Manufacturing
  1003 Retail sales
  1004 Healthcare
  1005 Lodging (hotels, dormitories etc.)
  1006 Assembly (churches, auditoriums, etc.)
  1007 Education (classrooms)
  1008 Food sales and service
  1009 Parking Garage
  1010 Laboratory
  1011 Outdoor

       Fixture Type
    13 Fluorescent-commercial-no lens
    14 Fluorescent- commercial-clear lens
    15 Fluorescent- commercial-translucent lens
    16 Fluorescent - deep cell louver
    17 Fluorescent - small cell louver
    18 Fluorescent- industrial-open fixture
    19 Fluorescent- industrial-enclosed fixture
    20 Incandescent- downlight ("can")
    21 Incandescent-spotlight'floodlight
    22 Incandescent-decorative 'sconce
    23 Incandescent-pendant fixture
    24 Incandescent-general illumination
    25 Incandescent-exterior landscape
    26 Incandescent - track lighting
    27 HID-outdoor-cobra head
    28 HID-outdoor-shoe box
    29 HID-outdoor-wallpak-flood
    30 HID-outdoor-landscape
    31 HID-outdoor-sports lighting
    32 HID-indoor-high bay
    33 HID-indoor-low bay
    34 HID-indoor-recessed commercial
    35 HID-indoor-sports lighting
    36 Exit sign-incandescent
    37 Exit sign-fluorescent
    38 Exitsign-LED
    39 Exit sign-electroluminescent
    40 Exit sign- tritium
    41  Exit sign- luminescent
    42 Indirect

       Installation  by
 2030  in-house staff
 2031  contractor
 2032  utilitv
   Lamp Type
54 T-8
55 T-10
56 T-12 Energy Saving
57 T-12 Cathode cut-out
58 T-12 High Lumen
59 T-12 Standard
60 T-12 High Output (SOOma)
61 T-12 VHO(lSOOma)
62 T-17VHO(1500ma)
63 T-5 single ended
64 Compact twin-tube
65 Compact quad-tube
66 Compact-integrated ballast
67 Compact-circular
68 Incandescent-general service (A. PS.T)
69 Incandescent-Reflector (R, PAR, ER)
70 Incandescent-decorative
71 Halogen-general service
72 Halogen-reflector (R,PAR, MR)
73 Halogen-tubular
74 HID-mercury vapor
75 HID-metal halide
76 HID-high pressure sodium
77 HID-\vhite-HPS
78 Low pressure sodium
79 T-12 Slimline

   Ballast Type
80 Fluorescent-old standard magnetic
81 Fluorescent-efficient magnetic
82 Fluorescent-hybrid cathode cutout
83 Fluorescent-standard electronic
84 Fluorescent-integrated electronic
85 Fluorescent-extended output electronic
86 Fluorescent-partial output  electronic
87 Fluorescent-dimming electronic
88 Fluorescent-step dimming  electronic
89 Fluorescent-HO standard magnetic
90 Fluorescent-HO (SOOma) electronic
91 Fluorescent-VHO standard magnetic
92 Fluorescent-compact magnetic
93 Fluorescent-compact electronic
94 HID-magnetic
95 HID-electronic
96 Fluorescent-HO efficient magnetic
97 Fluorescent-VHO efficient magnetic
     Upgrade Type
 110 Relamp only
 111 Delamp only
 112 Relamp and reballast
 113 Specular reflector delamp
 114 Reflector Reballast
 115 New Lens Reflector-Reballast
 116 New lens louver
 117 New fixture
 118 Convert Incand. to Fluorescent or HID
 119 Task Lighting

     Control  Type
 100 Manual switching
 101 Manual dimming
 102 Occupancy sensor
 103 Timed switching
 104 Timed dimming
 105 Daylight switching
 106 Daylight dimming
 107 Panel level dimming
 108 Panel level EMS
 109 Power reducer

     Survey/Analysis by
2010 in-house personnel
2011 independent consultant
2012 electrical contractor
2013 utility representative
2014 equipment supplier
2015 lighting management company
2016 energy services company
2017 Green Lights Surveyor Ally
2018 Architect
2019 Lighting Designer
2024 Electrical Distributor

     Equipment Provided by
2020 lighting equipment supplier
2021 lighting management company
2022 utility
2023 contractor
2040
2041
2042
Financing by
internal funds
conventional loan
utihtv
                                         2043  lease lease-purchase
                                         2044  shared savings
                                         2045  other
                                       POLLUTION PREVENTION
                                           You may want to estimate the
                                           pollution prevention of this
                                           project for your own use.  Use the
                                           follow ing formulas and factors:
                                     :02:   kWh yr
                                           saved
                                    SO2:   kWhyr
                                           saved
                                    NOx:   kWh-yr
                                           saved
                     emission
                     factor
                     emission
                     factor
                     emission
                     factor
lbs-yr

g>T

g/yr
                                      EPA Regional Emission Factors (see note below)
                                    REGION 1: CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT
                                    Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:         1.1       4.0     1.4
                                    REGION 2: NJ, NY, PR, VI
                                    Emission per       CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:         1.1       3.4     1.3
                                    REGION 3: DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV
                                    Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:         1.6       8.2     2.6
                                    REGION 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN
                                    Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:        1.5       6.9     2.5
                                    REGION 3: IL, IN, Mi; MN, OH, WI
                                    Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:        1.8      10.4     3.5
                                    REGION 6: AR, LA, NM, OK, TX
                                    Emission per       CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:        1.7       2.2     2.5
                                    REGION 7: IA, KS, MO, NE
                                    Emission per       CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:        2.0       8.5     3.9
                                    REGION 8: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY
                                    Emission per       CO2      SO2   NOx
                                    kWh saved:        2.2       3.3     3.2
                                     REGION 9: AZ, CA, HI, NV, Guam, Am Samoa
                                     Emission per      CO2      SO2  NOx
                                     kWh saved:        1.0       1.1    1.5
REGION 10: AK, ID, OR, WA
Emission per      CO2      SO2   NOx
kWh saved:         0.1       0.5    0.3
                                               Note: State pollution emission factors are
                                              aggregated by EPA region. Factors for U.S.
                                            territories are national average emission factors.
                                            See the Green Lights Lighting Upgrade Manual.
page 2 of 620019-30 94]

-------
                                                                GREEN LIGHTS UPDATE, DECEMBER 1994
               Software
               Corner
                  ProjectKalc version 1.10 is available.
               This enhanced version of ProjectKalc
               allows users to analyze upgrade options
               on a fixture-specific basis, aggregate fix-
               ture upgrades into projects, and, optional-
               ly, perform room-specific light level
               analyses. Version 1.10 enhancements
               allow users to define their own fixtures
               and export project information to
               ReportKalc, the progress reporting soft-
               ware. ProjectKalc version 1.10 can be
               ordered through the Green Lights/Energy
               Star Hotline at 202 775-6650.
                  Development continues on an option-
               al module for ProjectKalc that will recom-
               mend upgrades based on existing fixtures
               and desired relative light output.
               ProjectKalc Expert is expected to recom-
mend several alternative fixture, lamp,
ballast, and control configurations for
each existing fixture, provide the associat-
ed lighting savings and costs, and allow
users to select the desired option or spec-
ify their own solution. A release date and
ordering information will appear in
Software Corner.
   The Green Lights Financing Directory,
the rebate and financing information soft-
ware,  is being updated. The Financing
Directory contains information on utility
incentives and third-party financing
options for energy-efficient lighting
upgrades. Preliminary data collection is
under way. Call the Green Lights/Energy
Star Hotline at 202 775-6650 to order the
Financing Directory. Fl
Implementation  Snapshot
Compact Fluorescent Lamps Installed in Completed Upgrades
        200,000
        150,000
        100,000
         50,000
            0  Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oa Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct No* Dec Jan Feb March April May June July Aug
               '92  '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '93 '93  '93 '93 '93 '93 '93 '93 '93 '93 '93 '93 '94 '94  '94 '94  '9-f '94 '94 '94

                                                 Month/Year
                                                                                             15

-------
   t / Ep*
  .   Green
  S Lights
U.S.  EPA  Green  Lights c
          i inuTiMr; i IPT,R AHP wnRk'<;i-inp<;            \X
UPGRADE
2'/2 -Day Workshops Featuring:
• Lighting Upgrade Technologies
• Lighting Analysis Software
• Project Planning and Management
• Financing Options and Analysis
• Green Lights Reporting
• Lighting Maintenance and Disposal
• Surveyor Ally Exam (on third day)

Name
               Preregistration Form: Green Lights workshops are free and open to the public. Space is limited,
               however, and priority will be given to Green Lights Partners. Complete details and instructions
               will be faxed to preregistrants within 4 weeks of the workshop date. Return this form to Green
               Lights Lighting Services Group, fax: 703 934-3530. Or mail to EPA Green Lights (6202J),40I
               M Street, SW.Washington, DC 20460.                                   t
                        Title
Company/Organization
Address
City
Phone ( )


State ZIP Code
Attendee fax number is very important
p,y to expedite the processing of this form.
      area code
      dl Cfl IAJUC
Status (Please check one)   G Partner      Q Ally      G Surveyor Ally Candidate     U Other


Please Indicate Preferred Workshop*:

Q Nashville,TN December 14-16                    Q Little Rock,AR March 1-3

Q Atlanta, GA January 9-11                         Q Chicago, IL  May 2-4

*Please call 202 862-1 145 for current workshop information. The Surveyor Ally exam will be given on the morning of Day 3 and will conclude by I 1:00 a.m.
   &EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
   Air and Radiation (6202J)
   Washington,  DC 20460

   Official  Business
   Penalty for Private Use
   $300
                            a Dickinson
                        [PA
                        726 Minnesota Avenue
                        W.i-lR Management Division
                            - city, KS 66101
                                              BULK RATE
                                              Postage and Fees Paid
                                              EPA
                                              G-35

-------