EPA  560/4-84-002
                                  May  1984
TOXICS '95: OUTLOOK OF FACTORS AND TRENDS FOR

               TOXIC CHEMICALS
                      by
                Vary T. Coates
                  Lisa Heinz
                Joseph Coates
                 Tracie Monk
           Contract No. 68-01-6287
               Project Officers
            Ellen Selonick Berick
                 George Wirth
      Economics and Technology Division
          Office of Toxic Substances
            Washington, DC  20460
 OFFICE OF PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          WASHINGTON, DC  20460

-------
                        DISCLAIMER
     This report was prepared under contract to an agency of
the United States Government.  Neither the United States
Government nor any of its employees, contractors, subcontractors,
nor their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third
party's use or the results of such use of any information,
apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or
represents that its use by'such third party would not infringe
on privately owned rights.

     Publication of the data in this document does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect 'the joint or separate views
and policies of each sponsoring agency.  Mention of trade names
or commercial products .does not constitute endorsement or recom-
mendation for use.

-------
                            PREFACE

     The Toxic Substances Control Act 1s broad legislation
covering Immense and complex environmental and economic Issues.
Congress charged the Office of Toxic Substances (OTS) with not
unduly Impeding technological Innovation while fulfilling the
primary purpose of the Act, assuring that innovation and commerce
in chemicals do not present an unreasonable risk  of injury to
health or the environment.   To do this difficult task well,
OTS needs to know more about the likely direction of techno-
logical innovation 1n the chemical industry, and of. the environ-
mental and policy issues that it will face in the next
decade.

     This work was undertaken to  assist OTS'in  identifying the
factors and trends that  may shape the  next  decade of toxic
substances control.  By  attempting to  anticipate what the next
ten years may bring,  OTS increases  its opportunity to deal
effectively with the problems and to  use  its  resources efficiently.
      Chapters 1  and 2 of this report may be read as an Executive
 Summary.   Chapters 3-5 are expanded information.
      The results of  the  study may be  used by OTS  staff to change
 priorities, or the way 1n which OTS coordinates  with other agencies,
 or  to suggest further research on particular topics.   However, the
 primary point is to  assist  in the long-term policy  and  budget
 planning for the office.
      The work reported herein is principally the  responsibility of
 Vary  T. Coates, Ph.D., Lisa Heinz, Joseph F. Coates, and Trade
 Monk.  Additional support was provided by Henry H.  Hitchcock.  The

-------
 physical preparation of the document was under the supervision of
 Beverly Goldberg with the assistance of Bernice Mann, Ann Webber,
 Diana Clark, Flora Riemer, Maureen Jones, and Elijah Merritt.
      At the Office of Toxic Substances, our Project Managers were,
 first,  Ellen Selonick, and  later  George Wirth.  We have all  enjoyed
 their guidance, assistance, and support.
     J.  F.  Coates, Inc., a futures research and policy analysis
 firm, carried out this project as subcontractor to ICF, Inc.,
 Washington, D.C.   We thank Joe Kirk of ICF for his cooperation
 and support during the project.
     This report was produced under Subcontract EPA 22-12,
 ICF Contract No.  68-01-6287.  The opinions, conclusions, findings,
 and recommendations are those of the authors and do not neces-
 sarily reflect  the opinions  of ICF,  Inc.,  or of the Office of
Toxic Substances.
                              ii

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                             Page
PREFACE	   i
TABLE OF CONTENTS..	 iii
CHAPTER 1- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
   INTRODUCTION, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS	   1
      Findings and Conclusions	   4
      Imp!ications far OTS/EPA	  11
CHAPTER 2
   SCENARIOS OF THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, 1995	  17
      Scenario 1 - RAPID EVOLUTION	  20
      Scenario 2 - MULTIDIMENSIONAL CHANGE	  26
      Scenario 3 - STABILITY	  32
CHAPTER 3                      .    -                         '
   THE CHANGING PATTERNS OF THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY	  37
      A1.   INDUSTRY OVERVIEW	  37
          1.   The Importance of the Chemical  Industry
              to the U.S.  Economy	  37
          2.   The Chemical  Industry and World Trade	  42
                 Developed  Nations	  45
      B.   THE DOMESTIC CHEMICAL INDUSTRY	  46
          1.   Industry Strategies	  46
                 Production	  47
                 Finance	  48
                 Employment	  48
                 R&D	  49
                 Pilot Plants and Scale-Up	  50
          2.   Si?e and Location	  51
          3.   Product Trends	  53
                 Petrochemi ca 1 s	  53
                 Other Organic  Chemicals	  53
                 Agricultural  Chemicals	  54
                 Drugs	  54
                 Telematics	  55
                               iii

-------
      C.  CHANGES IN CHEMICAL FEEDSTOCKS, ENERGY
          USE, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT	  57
          1.  Feedstocks and Energy	  57
          2.  Waste Management Problems and Opportunities...  64
                 The Scope of the Problem	  64
                 Technological Options		  69
                 Management Patterns	  72
                 Invisible Wastes	  73
      D.  RISK MANAGEMENT	'	  73
          1.  Industry and Risk Reduction	  73
          2.  Genetic Screening	  79
          3.  Security Issues:  Sabotage and Terrorism	  80
          4.  Insurance	.	  81
CHAPTER 4
   SOCIAL AND POLITICAL TRENDS AFFECTING
   PRODUCTION AND REGULATION OF CHEMICALS	  85
      A.  LONG-RANGE SOCIETAL TRENDS	  85
          1.   Demographic Trends	  86
          2.   International  Trends	  90
          3.   Economic Conditions	  91
      B.  POLITICAL  TRENDS 1984-1995	  93
          1.   The Continuing Growth of an
              Environmental  Coalition	  93
                 Environmental  Activism and
                 Emerging Political  Alliances.	,	  96
          2.   Risk Management	  99
          3.   Federal  Legislation	 101
          4.   Federal'Regulations	 106
          5.   The States  and Toxic  Chemicals	 110
          6.   Organized  Crime	 116
          7.   Litigation	 117
          8.   The Developing Issues  of Liability
              and Victim  Compensation	 118
          9.   Environmental  Mediation	 121

-------
                                                             Page
         10,  International Pressures	•	 123
         11.  U.S. Export Policy and Toxic Chemicals	 125
         12.  Right to Know	 126
         13.  Computers and Telecommunications	 129
         14.  The Media as Catalyst	 130
      C.  SOURCES OF INCREASED ALARM OVER
          TOXIC SUBSTANCES, 1984-1995	 130
          1.  Groundwater Contamination:
              An Inevitable Political Issue	 131
          2.  Transport of Toxic Chemicals	 136
          3.  Widespread Contamination from Disruption
              of Old Repositories of Toxics	 140
          4.  Acid Precipitation	 142
      0.  A SUMMARY OF EMERGING, NEAR-TERM POLITICAL
          ISSUES AFFECTING THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES	 145
CHAPTER 5
   FRONTIERS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY./.	 147
      A.  CHEMICALS, MAN, AND ENVIRONMENT:
          TESTING AND MONITORING TECHNOLOGIES	 148
          1.  Chemical  Analysis, Toxicology
              and Risk Assessment	 148
          2.  Analytical  Chemistry:   Pushing
              the Limits  of Sensitivity	 152
          3.  Toxicity Testing	 154
          4.  Telematics-Based Technologies	 157
              Structure Activity Relationships	 157
              Biosensors	 159
          5.  Chemical  Mixtures:
              Synergy and Antagonism	 159
          6.  Institutions	 160
          7.  Epidemiology	 161
                 Epidemiological  Techniques	 163
          8.  Environmental  Technology	 164

-------
                                                              Page
       B.   PRIORITY  SETTING	  168
           1.   Defining  Hazard	  168
           2.   The Need  to  Set  Priorities	......  169
           3.   New Health Concerns	  172
                 Aging.. •.	  172
                ' Birth  Defects	  174
           4.   Exposure,  Environment, and  Risk:
               New Sources  of Concern	  176
                 Natural Versus Man-Made  Hazards	  176
                 Pervasive Environmental  Contaminants	  176
                 Indoor Air Pollution	  177
       C.   TRENDS IN MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS	  177
           1.   Metals and Alloys	  178
           2.   Surface Science and Catalysis	  178
           3.   Polymers, Plastics, and Synthetic Rubbers	  179
           4.   Ceramics and  Other Inorganic Materials	  179
           5.   Composites	  179
           6.   Telematics-Related Materials	  180
           7.   Energy-Related Materials	  181
                 Enhanced  Oil Recovery	  182
                 Batteri es	  182
                 Photovoltaics	  182
           8.   Agricultural  Chemicals	  184
       D.   TELEMATICS (TELECOMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS,
           INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES)	  185
       E.   BIOTECHNOLOGY AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES	  188
REFERENCES	  193
APPENDIX:  LIST OF WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVIEWEES... A-l
EXHIBITS:
       1.   Scenarios and Scenario  Variables	   18
      2.   Materials and Product Flow of Chemical  Industry..   38
      3.   United States Trade  Balance  in Chemicals	   39
      4.   Feedstock Security  Position  of Some  Leading
            Chemical  Firms	   50

-------
 5.    Biotechnology Activities of Leading U.S. Chemical
        Producers	  62
 6.    Quoted Prices for Major Hazardous Waste Firms in 1981..  67
 7.    Waste Management: Soundness and Methods	  70
 8.    Changes in Industry Waste Disposal- Procedures	  72
 9.    Industry Chemical Hazard Assessment Programs	  74
10.    Industry Reported Changes in Testing Programs: A CMA
        Survey	  76
11.    Chemical Industry Survey 1981 Toxicity Testing Programs
        Mean and Total Responses	  77
12.    Selected Occupational Cancers	  78
13.    Where the Securi ty Money Goes	  80
14.    Public Perception of Environmental Laws and Regulations,
        1973 -1981	  95
15.    Legislative Authorities Affecting the Life Cycle of a
        Chemi cal	 107
16.    Total Toxic's Related Bills Passed 1960-83	 113
17.    Totals: Introductions vs. Bills Enacted 1978-83	 113
18.    Use of Groundwater	 132
19.    Reported Incidents of Groundwater Contamination	 134
20.    Incidents By Mode and Reporting Year	 137
21.    Accidents Involving Toxic Chemicals: Representative
        Incidents	 138
22.    Analysis of Toxic Substances	 151
23.    Toxicity Test Effort	155
24.    Quality Ratings of Toxicity Tests Done on 100 Substances:
        a National  Research Council Study....	156
25.    Process for Setting Testing Priorities	170
26.    Proposed Scoring Factors for EPA Evaluation of Priority
        Chemicals Under TSCA	171
27.    A Possible Ranking of Specific Chemically-Induced Health
        Effects in  Humans	173
28.    Trends in U.S.  Consumption  of Plastics and Key Metals,
        1960-1985	179
29.    Burgeoning Uses of Chemicals and Plastics in
        Electronics.,.	181
30.    Biomedical Telematics Instruments	186
                               vii

-------
                             CHAPTER 1
               INTRODUCTION,  FINDINGS,  AND  CONCLUSIONS

          Chapters  1  and  2  of this report constitute  an
          EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of the  report.
          Chapter  1 summarizes this  study of  the  outlook
          for regulation  of chemicals  in the  environment
          and highlights  findings and  conclusions,  and
          the implications  for OTS.
          Chapter  2 presents  alternative scenarios  for
          the future  of the U.S. chemical  industry and
          regulatory  process.

     The  Toxic Substances  Control Act  of 1976 empowered the
 Federal government to  regulate and  control the production
 and  use of  chemicals that  will or may  present an unreasonable
 risk of injury to  health or  to the  environment.  Congress also
 directed  that the  Environmental Protection Agency which  administers
 this broad mandate through its Office  of Toxic Substances (OTS),
 shall not "unduly  impede technological innovation" in the chemical
 industry, which is recognized as important .to the economic life of
 the  nation.
     There is no simple or complex formula for determining what
 constitutes unreasonable risk.  Nor is there a ready consensus as
 to what regulatory strategies' might or might not unduly  impede
 technological innovation.  These determinations must be made on a
 case-by-case basis and in a context of uncertainty about the future
 evolution and behavior of the chemical industry.   The industry is,
 and will  continue to  be,  responding and adapting  to complex changes
 in its economic environment,  to increasing  competition  in world
markets,  and to continuing  advances in science and technology.   The
 industry  also responds to pressures that arise from public concerns
 and public values, and to a broad  range of other  national policies
 ana objectives.

-------
                                  -2-
     OTS, to better guide the development and implementation of its
program objectives and to develop more cost-effective means of
achieving industry compliance with Federal policies, tries to
anticipate and understand the forces acting on the chemical
industry and their implications for effective control of the risks
associated with production and use of chemicals in our society.
     As an early step in improving its foresight capability, OTS
commissioned this broadly exploratory study to provide a futures
perspective on the problems of toxic substances control over the
next dozen years — 1983-1995.  This report is to be used by OTS
staff in reassessing and evaluating OTS priorities and opportunities
for action, the way OTS coordinates with other EPA programs, state
governments, agencies in other nations, and other Federal agenices,
and EPA needs for further research and analysis of unfolding develop-
ments.  The twelve-year horizon, while arbitrary, does represent a
 reasonable futures perspective for addressing toxic  chemical  concerns
 because it takes about that long for a new generation of  chemicals to be
 broadly distributed and have significant economic impact.
     This study was designed to identify and consider the inter-
actions of trends .affecting the nation in general  and thus both
the chemical  industry and public expectations about its role and
activities.  In particular the study was to consider:
     •  business and economic trends, including shifts in
        business strategy and likely changes in international
        trade patterns;
     t  scientific and technological  trends, including areas
        where advances in knowledge  can  be expected that will
        influence or create public health concerns, and areas
        ripe  for innovation such as  alternative chemical  feed-
        stocks or waste  disposal  technologies;
     t  political  trends, covering the general  evolution of
        public attitudes, political  responses,  and  the evolution
        of institutions,  laws,  and regulations;  and
     •  broad social,  demographic, and lifestyle trends.

-------
                         -3-
     Having surveyed this broad range of evolutionary and
revolutionary trends and potentialities, the study was to
suggest two or three scenarios that would provide alternative
futures for the U.S. chemical industry.  These scenarios
presented in Chapter 2, it should be stressed, are not predictions
or forecasts.  The scenarios are heuristic.  They should
stimulate OTS analysts to think constructively and creatively
about the forces changing the nature of their responsibilities
and about the resulting new problems and opportunities.  The
reader is invited to construct alternative scenarios from
variables presented in this report.

     The scope of long-range trends and possible events and
developments covered permits only qualitative analysis.  The
analysis depended on interpretation of information from open
literature, especially trade journals and scientific and
professional periodicals, and on interviews and discussions
with experts and informed observers in industry, unions,
government, academies, and public interest groups.

     A workshop held one-third of the way through the five-
month project was especially valuable.  Sixteen people representing
major interests affected by toxic chemical regulation -- from
major chemical corporations to public interest advocates --
reviewed working papers prepared by the research team.  They
spent a full day with us in evaluating the first-phase work and
advising on how to proceed.  Workshop participants are listed
in the Appendix.  The draft final report was reviewed in a
second workshop in December 1983.  Those reviewers are also
listed in the Appendix.  Approximately 36 experts were interviewed,
in person or by telephone, during the course of the study.
These people are also listed in the Appendix.
     The scenarios of alternative futures for the chemical  industry in
1995 are presented in Chapter 2.  The introduction to the chapter

-------
                                  -4-
explains how the scenarios were generated.  These scenarios depend

on  the materials presented in Chapters 3,4, and 5, which identify

and discuss long-range trends and their interactions, and the
implications for the problem of controlling the risks of toxic

chemicals in modern society.  Chapter 3 looks at trends in the
industry itself, in the business environment and in international
trade patterns.  Chapter 4 considers social and political trends

and identifies some emerging policy issues which, within the next

decade, have the potential for involving the industry in contro-
versy and conflict.  Chapter 5 reviews impending developments and
areas of advancement in basic and applied science, and in indus-

trial innovation, that will affect industry problems and opportuni-
ties.  For convenience, the findings and conclusions arising from

this work are given below.


                     FINDINGS  AND CONCLUSIONS

The Chemical  Industry:   Strong,  Mature

     •  The  chemical  industry  plays  a  central  role  in  our economy.
        It  is  the fourth  largest manufacturing  industry  in the
        United  States  and  a big  contributor to  our  balance of pay-
        ments,  with  a  better than two-to-one ratio  of  exports  to
        imports.

     •  The  chemical  industry  after  four  decades  of growth is  a
        maturing  industry,  facing rising  costs  of production  and
        increasing competition in international  trade.   Its
        largest customers  — the .automobile, housing,  and  steel
        industries -- are  not  likely to enjoy again  the  growth
        rates of  recent decades.

     t   Some parts of the  chemical  industry, especially  commodity
        chemicals,  are likely  to have  continuing over-capacity  for
        several years.   The work force is  likely to remain stable
        or  to  shrink,

     •   Industry  strategy  for  the next decade will  emphasize  cost-
        reduction,  risk-aversion, risk-spreading (through insurance
        and  through  diversification, for  example),  and the shedding
        of  low  profitability products  and  units.

-------
Product Mix;  Movement to Specialties

     •  There will be a marked movement toward high or value added
        specialty chemicals and relatively little growth 1n bulk
        chemicals production in the United States.

     •  The United States will continue to be a leader in develop-
        ment of new speciality chemicals and new applications of
        old chemicals because of its strength in science and tech-
        nology.  Materials sciences, electronic chemicals, and bio-
        chemicals will be growth areas.

     t  Investment in R&O will grow slowly, with a tendency to
        shift basic research to universities.  Large companies, how-
        ever, are making investments in bioengineering with large-
        scale commercial applications expected to begin by 1990
        or 1995.

Industry Demography;., Relatively Stable

     •  No significant shifts in facilities location are expected
        although new specialty chemical plants will  be built.

     •  The average plant size is likely to decline.  Few or no
        new world-class facilities are expected to be built in
        the U.S. except possibly in Alaska.

Feedstock:  Impending Change

     •  Toward  the  end of the next  decade  there  is  likely to be a
        noticeable  movement  to new  feedstocks  for  organic chemicals
        ~ primarily  coal, with biomass as  another  strong contender
        along with  biotechnology  products.
     t  One uncertainty for  the chemical  industry  from 1983-1995
        is the  cost of petroleum and natural  gas,  as feedstock
        and energy  source.
Issues  Confronting the  Industry

     •   One  great  uncertainty  and possibly the largest problem facing
        the  Industry  1s  the  question  of  the  now  unplannable  costs
        of liability  and victim  compensation.

     t   At some  time  in  the  near future,  there will almost cer-
        tainly be  renewed  demand for  and  impetus  toward  increased
        testing  and regulation of "existing  chemicals" -- those  In
        commerce prior to  TSCA.  This will impose great  new  uncer-
        tainty and Increased costs on the industry.

     •   Related  and Important  problems are:

        — the rising costs of insurance, and

-------
                                  -6-
        — the decisions about improved waste management and dis-
           posal, and the emerging technologies of high tempera-
           ture incineration, recycling, and microbial engineering
           for waste reduction.

     •  Genetic screening of workers, labeling, and right-to-know
        laws will be major workplace issues.

     •  Multidimensional risk management will be the greatest
        management challenge from 1983 to 1995; this includes:
        — new testing, monitoring, and analytical  techniques;
        — new security measures  to protect facilities and  per-
           sonnel  from terrorists and sabotage.

     •  There is a strong movement toward the mandatory release  of
        previously closely-held information, illustrated by
        Section 8e of TSCA,  State right-to-know legislation, and
        the new OSHA hazards communication rule.

The Social Context

     •  Six long-range demographic trends will  be  important to the
        industry:

        — the political  and social  dominance of the 35-45  year  old
           age group,  characterized by a high level  of health and
           environmental  concerns and political  activism;
        — increasing  longevity,  accompanied by increased concern
           about the relationships between environmental  factors,
           morbidity,  and life  expectancy;
        — prevalence  of smalj, dual-income households,  impl-ying
           both increasing per  capita consumption  of consumer
           products  and greater independence, mobility,  and
           assertiveness of  employees;
        — decentralization  of  other industry toward  the Sunbelt
           and toward  small  cities and suburban areas, with result-
           ing changes in the patterns  of industrial  users  of chemi-
           cals,  transportation of hazardous products  and wastes,
           and availability  of  facility and waste disposal  sites;
        — a  continuing migration of people toward  the Sunbelt and
           toward smaller communities so that chemical facilities
           and waste disposal sites will be less readily acceptable
           in some areas than now;
        -- both the  work force  and the  general  population are
           increasingly well  educated;  and increasingly  mobile --
           demands  for a  safe environment will  become  more  general
           in all  regions.
        -- Women will  make up nearly  half of the work  force by
           1995;  there will  be  increasing concern about  genetic
           and reproductive  effect of chemicals  in  the work place.

-------
                                 -7-
Public Attitude:   Support for Risk Reduction

     •  Environmental  and scientific policy Issues are increasingly
        international  in  scope.   Health effects of chemicals in world
        trade are likely  to  bring  about recurring international
        controversies  and diplomatic tensions.
     •  Public support for environmental  safety will remain strong
        and well  organized.   There 1s an emerging coalition between
        environmental  interest groups and trade unions that may
        become a powerful factor.

     •  Opinion surveys indicate that  the public is  increasingly
        Intolerant of Involuntary risks.

Decisionmaking;  Scientific  and Public Pressures

     •  Public decisionmaking will be  subject to two strong pres-
        sures; the influence of scientific information and advanced
        analytical  techniques, and demand for openness and oppor-
        tunity for public review.

     •  The need for greater consistency 1n regulation will be an
        Increasingly visible issue.  Concerns include harmonization
        of local, state, national, and international regulation;
        consistency of regulation throughout the lifecycle of sub-
        stances, across different applications and different indus-
        tries; and the lack of understanding and data on the rela-
        tionship between regulation and innovation.

     •  Congressional  reaction to court restrictions on the use of
        the legislative veto and a more general swing toward greater
        Congressional  assertiveness may lead to a reduction in the
        discretion and flexibility allowed to regulatory agencies.

     •  Congress is seeking improved capability for foresight and
        planning, both for itself and  for the Executive Branch.

      f  Deregulation efforts will  be highly  scrutinized and increases
        in regulation  may be called for by public  interest groups.  Not
        withstanding deregulatory  efforts, increased  regulation is likely.

     •  There is  growing consensus among  scientists  and regulators
        that a more holistic, cross-media, and flexible regulatory
        strategy  1s necessary for future  progress in environmental
        quality.   This may run counter to Congressional pressures
        for reduced agency discretion*

     •  State toxic control  programs and  laws are increasing, with
        considerable diversity in approaches likely  to develop.
        State legislatures are handicapped by lack of scientific
        information and staff support. Waste disposal  sites and
        work place right-to-know laws  are the urgent Issues  in most
        states.

-------
                                  -8-
     •  State initiatives are likely to be driven by specific local
        disasters or alarms and by siting and transport controver-
        sies.  This may bring about extreme remedies in some cases.
        Differences in state laws will  cause problems for industry.
     •  There are signs that organized crime is an important factor
        in illegal hazardous waste disposal.  Such dumping will be
        difficult to halt without industry cooperation.

Increased  Litigation
     •  Increasing  reliance on  court  litigation  to  force  attention
        to public concerns  is likely.

     •  The volume  of  legal  cases of  victim compensation  will  con-
        tinue to  grow.   Awards  are likely to be  unpredictable,  but
        generally increasing in the absence of a legislatively
        imposed cap, or an  alternative  form of compensation.

     •  There are likely to be  changes  in tort law at the state level
        to facilitate the acceptance of epidemiological and statis-
        tical evidence of cause and effect.
     •  Environmental  mediation and negotiation  in  lieu of adver-
        sarial proceedings  will  increase  but will not significantly
        reduce the volume of legal proceedings.

Sources of Policy Issues
     •  Diplomatic pressure on  the U.S. to adopt stronger export
        controls  over toxic chemicals and other  hazardous products
        will increase.

     t   Computers and  telecommunications  will support  public  interest
        groups and public health  advocates  in working  for  strengthened
        regulation of  environmental hazards  by providing aggregated
        data  bases, networking,  and modeling  capability.

     •   The media will continue  to be a potent catalyst in public
        health concerns, and will  go to advocacy groups for informa-
        tion  if industry refuses  to provide  it.  Proprietary  informa-
        tion  versus public right  to know will be a growing issue.

     •   Specific  incidents of injury or risk  to  public health will be
        a  recurring stimulus to demand for new control measures.
        Likely sources of future  concern  are:
        -- discovery of the contamination of groundwater especi-
          ally where this threatens drinking water supplies;
        — rail or highway accidents involving toxic chemicals and
          resulting in death,  injuries, or large-scale evacuations;
        -- a  natural disaster, such as a flood or dam collapse, that
          is found to have spread concentrated toxic waste  deposits
          over a  large area.

-------
                                  -9-
     •  Genetic screening of workers,  as  an industrial  health pro-
        tection strategy, is likely to become a  major civil  rights
        and equal  opportunities issue.

     •  The politics of toxic chemicals control  will  be shaped by
        the stronger convergence of public health and worker
        safety issues.    :
 I
New Knowledge of Health  Effects
     •  Health concerns  will increasingly focus  on birth defects,
        reproductive and sexual disorders, aging processes,  neuro-
        logical  and neurochemical  disorders,  and immunology.
     t  Converging advances  in understanding  the metabolic  trans-
        formation  of chemicals, in genetics,  and in biomedical
        technologies are paving the way for individual  monitoring
        and neutralization of toxic substances within the body.

     •  It is becoming increasingly apparent  that there is  a  close
        link between genetics and  environment in causing disease.
     •  The distinction in  environmental  and  health  impacts
        between "natural" background  toxic  substances  and  man-
        made toxic substances  has  not yet been  addressed by
        science.   However,  there is a significant  difference  in
        the way the two are perceived by  society,  and  consequently
        a difference in regulatory priorities.

Improved Analytical Techniques
     •  Technologies for multidimensional analysis of  complex
        mixtures  of chemicals  are  being developed  rapidly.
        Attention to the synergy and  antagonism of chemicals
        interacting with other chemicals  will drive  toward life-
        cycle regulation.
     t  Linkages  of genetics to individual  variations  in suscept-
        ibility to disease  and environment  pollutants  is an early
        warning system which can help avert and reduce risk.  Some
        see this  development optimistically;  others  see it as en-
        couraging discrimination against  populations at unusual
        risk.  This Illustrates the many  policy compromises that
        will  have to be found  1n the  application of  fast-paced
        human genetic research to  environmental  problems.

     t  Modeling  of the transport  and transformation of  chemicals
        1n the environment  (and in man) demands  an integrated and
        large-scale approach.   This critical  area  of research could
        yield invaluable information  with coordination of  existing
        computer  technologies,  databases, and human expertise.

-------
                                 -10-
     •  Biology and biochemistry-based technologies present new
        opportunities for monitoring and detoxification in indus-
        try processes, waste sites, water supplies, and the
        natural and built environment.

Better Data and Interpretation
     •  The sensitivity of chemical detection  is  outstripping
        our ability to understand and respond  to  possible but
        uncertain  effects of chemicals at extremely low concen-
        trations.   This gap is likely to worsen  the policy
        conflict over acceptable  limits for known or suspected
        toxic substances.

     •  The need to mesh scientific knowledge  and uncertainty
        with social  priorities means  that a balance will
        have to be  drawn between  standardized  methodologies  and
        informed judgment in applying risk  analysis to
        regulation.

     •  Advances in epidemiology, computerized data collection
        and management, and improved medical analysis of cause
        and effect relationships  may lead toward  separation  of
        the population into groups of high, low,  and average
        risk to different environmental  factors  (including
        toxic substances).  Regulation will  have  to deal  with
        the different interests of these micropopulations,

     •  Systematic epidemiology,  integrating multiple sources of
        information,  may  gradually  become operational and  practi-
        cal.   Information  generated  independently  in  epidemiology,
        occupational  health  statistics,  medical records, environ-
        mental  monitoring,  and  demographic  analysis  could  even-
        tually  be compiled  into a  national  database  creating  a
        comprehensive and dynamic picture of exposure to  environmen-
        tal,  chemical,  occupational stresses in terms of social
        and  genetic factors.   Such data  is  now extremely difficult
        to  reconcile  and  interpret.   Serious issues  of privacy  and
        information access will have  to  be  resolved  before potential
        benefits can  be  fully  realized.  The networking of the  na-
        tion  through  telematics is already making  these issues
        more  urgent,

     •   As  toxicity testing methods diversify and  expand,  the need
        to assure reliability  and comparability of  test results
        grows.  This  concern applies  across different tests on
        a single substance;  to  tests  across industry, government,
        and academic  labs; and  to  testing across  laboratories
        from  different  nations.

-------
                                   -11-
      t  International  attention  to  analysis  and  regulation  of  toxic
         substances  is  increasing  along  with  pressure  for  inter-
         national  exchange  of  data and coordination  of testing
         and  standards.
      •  Computer-based  analysis  and toxicity testing  methodologies,
         primarily structure-activity relationships, are becoming
         more sophisticated and widespread  due to their Tow  cost
         and  high  speed.  We will  continue  to rely on  a battery of
         cellular  and animal methodologies, however, to provide
         the  database for computer analysis and  investigate  chronic
         and  acute whole-organism  responses to chemicals.

 New  Sources  of  Toxics

      •   The  rapid expansion of biotechnology will create  and
         release large amounts of  proteinaceous biological materials
         and  other intermediates and  products.  Little  is  known
         about the long-term health  and  environmental  effects of
         these materials.

      •   High-technology materials and products such as composites,
         plastics, electronic chemicals, photovoltaics, and ceramics,
         are  being developed faster  than their health and  environ-
         mental  effects can  be assessed.  These materials  add new
         opportunity for chronic or  accidental exposure to toxic
         substances during  their manufacture,  use  and environmental
         dispersal, and final disposal.
      t   Non-point sources of toxic  substances remain a problem
         for  regulation as well as a challenge for monitoring and
         control.  Dispersed chemicals contribute  a substantial
         proportion of the  total toxic load on the environment and
         will be of increasing concern as point sources are better
         controlled.

             IMPLICATIONS  FOR  EPA's  OFFICE  OF TOXIC  SUBSTANCES
      The mission of OTS as stated in the Toxic Substances Control Act

(TSCA),  is to insure that  chemicals  do  not impose unreasonable risk of

injury to the public,  or damage to our  common environment.  OTS is also

instructed that the  regulatory process  should not unduly impede innovation,

The perception of risks associated with  chemicals is increasing,  and the

public is less and less willing to consider them reasonable.  The chemi-

cal industry will  be under increasing pressure for better  risk  manage-

ment.  It is unclear what  effect  these  pressures  will  have on  industry

innovation, but it is  certain  that the  next decade will provide broad

opportunities for the  development of new,  highly  specialized chemicals

-------
                                     -12-
and biochemical products.  OTS will have to be prepared to stay abreast
of rapid changes 1n the development, manufacture, and use of chemicals.
      OTS will have the even more difficult task of staying abreast
of rapid developments in science, technology, and human health
assessment; most importantly in the physiology of aging and sexual
competence, neurological and neurochemical science, and Immunology.
These developments will stimulate new concern about toxic risks, but
will also provide new control capabilities.
Guidel 1nes for Imp!ementation
      TSCA created Federal  authority to control  chemicals, but its
equally important thrust is to create mechanisms for informing the
public about the risks associated with chemicals.  TSCA implies that
OTS should:
      •  support the Administration and Congress in developing
         public policy related to chemicals,
      •  as far as practical, act to stabilize expectations and re-
         quirements imposed on the chemicals industry, so that it
         can internalize these requirements and remain strong and pro-
         ductive, and
      t  foster frankness and openness in relationships between
         government, the public, and the chemical industry.
Principles for a Safe Toxics Management System
      TSCA may well be amended and strengthened in the future.  Both
the authority and the workload of OTS may increase.  Planning should
be underway now to prepare for enlargement of OTS's mission,  OTS's re-
sponsibilities are to support decisionmakers in developing toxic risk
policy and to deal  openly with the industry  and  the concerned  public.  These
considerations also should guide the eventual development of an integrated

-------
                                     .-13-
 and consistent national toxics management system or process that
 should have the following characteristics without regard to the juris-
 dictional boundaries imposed by incremental legislation (TSCA, OSHA,
 RCRA, CPSA, CERCLA):
      •  information generated cooperatively by industry and
         the government, about all chemicals on the market;
      »  adequate information about chemicals throughout their life-
         time of marketing, use, and disposal;
      t  assurance of safe handling at all times;
      •  assurance of safe, documented, and monitored waste disposal;
      9  monitoring of public health and of the environment to detect
         unanticipated effects and interactions of chemicals;
      •  the clean up of past mistakes;
      •  the internalization of the associated costs*
      Regulation of chemicals must impose costs on the chemical indus-
 try and ultimately on the users of chemicals. • In the past, however,
American industry has repeatedly shown itself to be sufficiently resil-
 ient and resourceful to absorb the costs of rising societal expecta-
tions of better health and a cleaner environment, and still remain
strong and vigorously competitive in world trade.
Possible Reorganization
      Over the next decade, as OTS's workload increases and becomes
more complex,  the need for close coordination with other agencies will
increase,,  Rationalization of chemicals regulation may require reor-
ganization of agencies that have closely related or overlapping respon-
sibilities.   For example,  elements of EPA, OSHA, CPSC, FDA, and NIOSH
might be combined.   In the meantime, more effective sharing of data
should help  all  of these agencies  in their assigned tasks,
New Policy Strategies
      High conflict political  issues,  driven by strong economic pres-
sures, complicate regulatory procedures and test the willingness of
industry to  comply,   OTS should be working to help invent  regulatory

-------
                                -14-
 strategles  that accomplish national policy objectives without
 reducing  Incentives  for  Industry cooperation.   If policymakers
 can draw  on OTS expertise, future regulatory strategies may be
 far less  difficult to implement and enforce.
     The  most important  challenge on the horizon for OTS Is the
 great  likelihood of  a sudden and powerful demand for increased
 attention to chemicals long on the market and in wide use.
The Changing Chemical Industry
     The chemical Industry itself will change in significant
ways over the next decade.  Regulatory strategies must reflect
and adapt to these changes.  Toward the end of the decade there
may be changes in feedstocks or commercialization of biological
processing and biochemical products, which will pose new environ-
mental and health questions.  EPA (and OTS) are now beginning
to prepare for these developments.  If they fail to meet this
challenge, they will again be forced to react and correct rather
than instruct and guide their safe Implementation.
     OTS is the obvious and most appropriate site for the aggre-
gation and analysis of data about chemicals.  To the extent that
such data 1s not collected and collated now 1n a systematic and
accessible way for use by other agencies and by industry, the
task will be much more difficult 1n the future.
Foresight
     OTS, charged with a difficult mission in a rapidly changing
society, should systematically strive to improve its ability to
anticipate change.  It needs to be able to anticipate new chemi-
cal products and changes in the mix of products, and to relate
these to changing market patterns.  OTS also needs to understand
long-range trends affecting the social context of risks to public

-------
                              -15-
health, Including changes in the age structure, location, and
activities of the population and their social values and politi-
cal priorities.
     Some strategies for better anticipation or foresight could
include:
     •  building a continuing planning and foresight process;
     •  carrying out studies of the innovation process in the
        chemicals industry, and of the factors influencing indus-
        try decisionmaking;
     •  using systematic procedures to monitor and interpret
        advances in the basic and applied sciences and advances
        in medical science and diagnostic techniques„
     OTS clearly must stay abreast of the latest developments in
analytical methods, assessment techniques, and instrumentation^
This should include developing the capability to use new tools
                             •*
and techniques of judgment theory and decision analysis.  Some
suggestions, for strengthening this capability include:
     t  development of a in-house Fellows program, bringing in
        people from universities, research laboratories, hospi-
        tals, industry, and environmental interest groups,
     •  providing sabbaticals and re-training for OTS  profes-
        sionals,
     •  bringing in recent retirees from industry,
     •  holding professional seminars and conferences.
Priorities
     OTS must have systematic and sensitive techniques for
priority setting, so that it can plan and schedule the alloca-
tion of its limited resources.   Some successful  techniques that
deserve to be used even more extensively are:
     •  decision analysis tools,
     0  advisory panels for priority setting and ranking,
     •  explicit criteria for selecting critical  issues,
     •  systematic ranking of the inventory of existing chemicals
        by volume of production, estimated exposure, and sus-
        pected risk characteristics,,

-------
                                -16-
 Regulatory  Innovation
      OTS  should continually pursue the design of innovative
 regulatory  strategies by:
      t  modeling the effects of past regulation and hypothetical
        regulation in terms of economic impacts, industry adapta-
        tions, and public response,
      •  attempts to develop improved techniques for economic and
        social impact assessment,
      •  exploring the feasibility of regulation focused on objec-
        tives rather than on standards or restrictions,,
 Communication withu Stakeholders
      It is  essential that OTS earn the respect and trust of
 the concerned public, of the chemical industry, and of the
 larger scientific community.  Some ways of doing this are:
     •  emphasizing public explanation and discussion of its
        proposed actions,
     •  holding seminars on regulatory issues for scientists,
        industry risk managers and decisionmakers, and public
        interest representatives,
     •  encouraging OTS professionals to publish and to play
        active roles in professional  and academic organizations
        and activities.
Other Leadership Opportunities
     OTS should take a. leading role in building institutions
and creating processes  that support and buttress its mission,
OTS might, for example,  propose and work for:
     •  a  systematic groundwater survey by EPA or another govern-
        ment agency such as the Corps of Engineers,
     •  more emphasis on environmental  epidemiology, in EPA, the
        Centers for Disease Control, and elsewhere,
     •  national  chemicals testing supported by government and
        industry,
     t  a  data bank dealing with existing  chemicals.

-------
                               -17-
                            CHAPTER 2
             SCENARIOS OF THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, 1995
     Dealing with complexity is a central problem in coming to
grips with the future and designing public policy programs.  Too
often, legislative, administrative, regulatory, or procedural
public policy is framed around only a few important factors or
a small set of issues which have matured into widespread conten-
tion.  This report approaches the future of toxic chemicals with
the explicit purpose of engaging the future, the next 12 years,
in the full complexity of the rapidly evolving situation.
     Scenarios are the tool for presenting integrated images„
The three snapshots presented are plausible alternative ways in
which the chemical industry and other factors influencing the '
toxics situation could evolve.  Each scenario is based on a
more formal analysis of trends and factors presented in later  .
chapters.  The scenarios are constructed by permuting the criti-
cal variables which will shape tire future of the industry.  Per-
muting each of the variables, even over reasonable ranges, would
create great numbers of marginally different pictures.  Conse-
quently, judgment enters into the presentation of the scenarios —
judgment as to the important variables, judgment as to how they
might interact, judgment as to the range of variations.  The
test of the scenarios is whether the user finds them useful  in
stimulating and shaping his thinking about public policy.  They
are to serve as foils for further discussion.
     Each of these scenarios is  based upon a selection and permu-
tation of the variables shown in Exhibit 1.
     §  The first scenario, Rapid Evolution, finds that many of
        the potentials for change of the structure, function,
        organization, and products of the industry move briskly
        to fruition, drastically altering structural  relation-
        ships within the industry, in the feedstocks  and pro-
        ducts, and in the functional  aspects of regulation,,

-------
                                                                         EXHIBIT 1
                  Scenario Variables


I.  Social  and Political Priorities
    a. Support for environmental protection

    b. Attitude  toward responsibility of
       industry,  governments
    c. Political  activism; consensus
II. Regulation and Political Decision/Hiking
    a. Local/State/Federal/international roles

    b. Litigation, mediation
    c. Liability and compensation: action, awards
    d. Regulatory strategies
    e. Risk assessment, CBA
    f. Regulatory organisation

    9. TSCA	
      I.  Rapid Evolution

Strong support from public and
political leaders
Places responsibility on Federal
government and industry
High degree of consensus	
   Scenarios
II.  MuItI-Dimensional Change

Weakening, but varies by region

Leaves responslbllty to State
and local governments
High degree of conflict	
     III.  Stability

Public support  growing,  leader-
ship resistant
Mixed responsibility:  Federal
and State
Significant degree of  cooperation
Strong Federal role, internal
regulation
High level of mediation
Controlled, consistent awards
Regulation-by-Objective

Restructured, agency reorganized

New Act, much pretesting
Federal deregulation

High level of litigation
High, but inconsistent awards
Varies widely by State
Emphasis on cost containment
Federal regulatory structure
dismantled
Limited to assistance to states
Mixed, all  have  roles
Much litigation, much mediation
RA and CBA widely used
OSHA/EPA regulatory coop.
III. Health, Environmental Concerns
    a. Environmental technologies

    b. Health oonitoring and analysis
    c. Toxicology
    d. Costs, scale, institutionalization of
       analytical techniques
    e. Changing health priorities
Increased environmental
monitoring
Increased testing and monitoring  Advances  in epidemiology
                                  Toxicology advances
Industry investment high. Nation- Right-to-know expanded
a) Center for testing
Neurological effects              Iranunological effects
                                     Advances in detoxification


                                     Aging, birth defects
IV. Feedstocks. Materials. Products
    a._ New materials: production, use

    b. Biologicals, biotechnology
    c. Feedstocks
Emphasis on composites

Some biological products in bulk,
competition high, much uncertainty

Progress on alternative feed-
stocks but little change
Innovation declining
Coal gaining as feedstock
Emphasis on photovoltaic!.
Innovation slips
Slower than expected progress
in biologicals, biologicals
under TSCA
Reliance on petroleum
 V. Industry Structure
    a. Shift from bulk to specialty chemicals
    b. Mergers, acquisitions, diversifications.

    c. Location, scale

    d. Labor-management relationships
    e. Industry policy, self-policing, etc.
    f. Industry and health care
Offshore production of bulk
grows. Shift to specialties
pronounced
Shake out, new growth

New small specialty plants,
new sites
Labor-Indus try cooperation   •
Positive industry attitudes
Government-industry cooperation
Joint U.S.-foreign ventures in bulks


Consolidation, diversification

Few new plants

Labor-Indus try conflict
Industry hard-lining
Right-to-know issue
Divestitures, increased foreign
ownership
Pla..c downsizing
Some self-policing
VI. International Context
    a. U.S. world trade position
    b. Competition

    c. International environmental pressures
    d. War. exogenous events
Strong
Middle-East, Brazilian competi-
tors
High cooperation between nations
Declining


Continual international disputes
Turmoil, terrorism hion
Chemical exports slip
3rd World competition

International regulations
and cooperation
                                                                                                                           00

-------
                                 -19-
      •   The  second  scenario, Multi-Dimensional  Change, chiefly
         emphasizes  continuity  but  highlights developments where
         substantial  changes could  occur, creating  important  new
         regulatory  implications.
      •   The  third scenario, Stability, emphasizes  continuity with
         minimum  change  in  terms of the effects  of  forces now
         acting on the industry and the toxics situation.
      The reader, of course, is invited*to generate other scenarios
 using the variables  in  Exhibit 1 or by introducing others.
      The scenarios  themselves are  in the form of a Table of
 Contents and^the lead article in a topical issue of a national
 trade or professional publication  in November,1995.  The scenarios
 avoid the mention of real  chemicals when there  is  a negative con-
 notation.  In those  cases, names of non-existent materials are
 used.  On the other  hand,  the names of real chemicals and chemi-
 cal companies are used  when the implications in the scenario are
 neutral  or positive.
      The background  to  these variables, i.e., the  analysis of the
 factors  entering into the  determination, of their relative impor-
 tance, are discussed in later chapters, as are many of the impor-
 tant  social  trends which will act  across-all the scenarios.  For
 example, within  the  relatively short interval of 12 years
 excellent forecasts  can be made about overall demographic patterns.
 Consequently, they  are  not raised  specifically  in  the scenarios
.but are  taken as background.  On the other hand, within the frame-
 work  of  the  scenarios,  market penetration of composite materials,
 a specific trend is  important.  Some readers may choose to go to
 the background material   before reading the scenarios.

-------
       -20-
  SCEMARIO 1





RAPID EVOLUTION

-------
                                      -21-
                                CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING

                             VIEWS
        Volume 83, Number 2
                           January 15,  1995
News of the Week


• New continuous multi-
enzyme process of Diamond
Shamrock and Morton Thiokol
is less  expensive, more
energy-saving than current
processes.            Page 6

• International represen-
tatives  meeting in Sweden
have drafted new guidelines
for shipping of hazardous
materials.          •  Page 6

• A computer program
developed at Caltech can
analyze  the toxicity of
a chemical structure
along over 1000 health
and environment variables.
                     Page 7

• One of three remaining
laboratory animal  supply
companies closed its doors.
                     Page 8

 •Ireland opens world-
class plant producing
chemicals from peat.
          Letters   4
      Editor's Page   5

     Concentrates
         Business   9
      Government  24
Science/Technology  30

  The Departments
          Books  41
     New Products  48
    ACS Comment  52
         Awards  55
      Newscripts  70
  Business

  The  focus on specialty chemicals has fueled
  Wall Street attention to acquisitions in the
  chemical industry.                      page  15
  International

  Middle  East  petrochemical  producers posted  a market
  gain for the eighth straight year; Hong  Kong,
  Singapore, and Indonesia have cornered the  Asian
  plastics markets.                       Page  18
 Government

  Broadened government insurance and health care
  provisions have offset  tightened liability
  standards and awards.                    Page 25
 Science

 Advances in  the genetics of thought and  behavior
 control  offer a means to inhibit anti-social
 behavior and a crucial  test to the laws  and
 ethics  governing R&D.                    Page  40

 Technology

The new  biocompatible polymers and the prosthetic
nervous  system

 Education
 Bioprocess engineering graduates outnumbered
 traditional chemical engineering majors  for
 the first time.                          Page 59
                     Cover Story
                     The  rapid evolution  of the
                     chemical industry over the
                     past decade has successfully
                     balanced restructuring around
                     specialties with health arid
                     environmental concerns, with
                     some help from the government,
                                        Page 30.

-------
                                      -22-
THE FIVE-YEAR REPORT OF THE JOINT
INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT COUNCIL ON
CHEMICAL  INNOVATION
A Successful Decade of Evolution
Through Government-Industry-Pub!ic
Cooperation

   ATLANTA, Nov. 3 — The shakeout
and regrowth of the chemical in-
dustry over the past ten years has
been much more dramatic than the
pundits predicted in the 1980's.
Driven by a resurgent, highly-pro-
fessional environmental movement
and increased pressure on Federal
resources to manage the complex
problems of international economic
competition and environmental con-
cern and cleanup, the Joint Indus-
try-Government Council on Chemical
Innovation was officially empow-
ered in 1989.  This month JIGCCI
(pronounced"jig-see) released its
five-year report, an integrated
analysis of the health of the U.S.
chemical industry.  C&EV has
talked with industry and govern-
ment observers, who have generally
lauded the JIGCCI1s work.  High-
lights of JIGCCI's report and some
of the comments of key observers
follow.
   Realization of the complexity
of environmental problems as well
as demands for government effi-
ciency and reorganization prompted
the restructuring of .government
regulatory oversight of chemicals
in 1990.  The Toxic Materials Reg-
ulatory Reform Act, which had
fought its way through Congress in
various forms for years,  combined
oversight, research,  and  regula-
tory functions of the old Office
of Toxic Substances,  the  Food and
Drug Administration,  and  the Occu-
pational Safety and Health Admin-
istration, with the EPA Director-
ate of Public, Occupational  and
 Environmental  Health.   At the same
 time,  the Reform Act enhanced the
 testing requirements for new prod-
 ucts,  streamlining the testing
 process to centralize  testing for
 potentially toxic substances
 throughout industry and government.
 EPA guidelines were brought into
 harmony with OECD guidelines as
 part of the 1990 renegotiation of
 GATT.   The 'boomerang  effect,'
 where  toxic substances produced
 only for export returned in the
 form of downstream products, was
 an  issue of growing concern that
 demanded international  coordina-
 tion.   In the  United Nations the
 developing nations pushed for the
 elimination of chemical  dumping
 and for increased  testing by the
 developed nations.   The  spark that
 finally led to the formation of
 the United Nations Organization
 for the Regulation of  Chemical  In-
 dustries  (UNORCI)  was  the 1989  cy-
 ano peptine poisoning  of the
 drinking  water of  Sao  Paulo,  Bra-
 zil, for  11  days,  leading to 367
 deaths  and 16,000  casualties.
    The  chemical  industry today,
 against this background,  has  sub-
 stantially increased its  invest-
ment in testing  of chemicals  both
 during  development and throughout
 the  product  lifetime,  though  most-
 ly  through support of  external
 work.   Over  the  past six  years  of
 its  operation,  the National  Cen-
 ter  for Toxicology and Analytical
 Chemistry,  housed  under  the  joint
 direction  of the National  Bureau
of  Standards and the National En-
vironmental  Health  Sciences  Pro-
 gram, has  -- in  real terms  -- in-
 creased its  budget  by 300%  and
more than  tripled  the number  of
 chemical  substances  it screens
each year.

-------
                                     -23-
   Closely tied to this has been
the substantial increase in gov-
ernment-sponsored environmental
monitoring.  The late 1980's were
a time of significant innovation;
the combination of fifth-genera-
tion computer capacity and expert
systems, a comprehensive albeit
fledgling national public health
database, and scientific advances
together provided the foundation
for the National Health Monitoring
Program.
   The scientific spur was a se-
ries of rapid advances in neuro-
environmental research, which
brought Dr. James Brennan and his
Johns Hopkins University team the
1994 Nobel Prize in physiology and
medicine.  Brennan and others
linked three lines of research in-
to a revolutionary but quickly-ac-
cepted picture.  The three keys
were first, the neuromechanism for
memory consolidation; second, a
neurochemical interrupter mecha-
nism associated with several sub-
sidiary paths leading to decaying
memory, toxic amnesia, hypnotic
forgetting, and neurological-based
amnesia; thirdly, the team's most
recent discovery that 14 chemicals
commonly used in the plastics in-
dustry are metabolically trans-
formed into neurointerruptors in
approximately 11% of the popula-
tion.
   The industry, while over-
whelmed by adverse public reac-
tion to these discoveries, has
with a few notable exceptions nei-
ther renounced liability nor
denied the potential impact on the
industry.
   The pervasiveness of the health
problem pushed support for cen-
tralized Federal action,  The
health monitoring and analysis
technologies team of the EPA/OSHA
 joint regulatory task force has
 placed chemical biosensors in
 10,000 households and is running
 an epidemiological survey in con-
 junction with the Communicable
 Disease Center in Atlanta, on
 100,000 American families.  The
 full  program for the analysis is
 presented in the National Academy
 of Science's report, The Role of
 Science in Facing Neurological
 Risks and is, of course, the sub-
 ject  of a comprehensive weekly re-
 port  by the Associated Press.
 Much  of the success of the Nation-
 al  Health Monitoring Program and
 its speed of response are a  result
 of  the extensive and well-received
 action of the Software Products
 Division of EPA,  which went  into
 high  gear in 1986.
    By 1986,  18 million American"
 households had microprocessors;
 many  environmental  groups as well
 as  all  major corporations were
 extensively telemated.   EPA  re-
 sponded  to the increasing pressure
 for sound  environmental  data by
 turning  out  environmental  data ma-
 nipulation,  monitoring,  and model-
 ing software packages.   They have
 since  become global  standards.
 The software packages  are now pro-
 duced  in 89  languages  and distrib-
 uted  through UNESCO.   Working with
 EPA's  Environmental  Sensors Divi-
 sion, widespread  low-cost  sensors
 are used by  industry, government,
 and environmental groups  and have
 been available  since 1988 at a
 subsidized rate to  individual cit-
 izens.  They  have been a  smashing
 success in environmental monitor-
 ing.
   The most  directly significant
development over the past decade
has been the accompaniment of the
growing support for environmental
cleanup by a nationwide wave of

-------
                                  •  -24-
 experiments  in  regulation,  clean-
 up,  compensation,  and enforcement.
 The  mixed  success  — but more  sig-
 nificantly the  failures —  at
 State  level  following a move to
 deregulation in the mid-19801s led
 to a recentralization of Federal
 authority  in the Comprehensive En-
 vironmental  Control Act of  1989,
 that centralized regulation of the
 environment  in  the EPA and  paved
 the  way for  the increase in influ-
 ence of the  industry advisory
 councils.
   The extensive support for envi-
 ronmental  cleanup and legislative
 innovations,  of course, grew out
 of the Reunion  Party's successes
 beginning  in  1988 with the elec-
 tions in Colorado, Montana, and
 South Dakota.   Much of the chemi-
 cal  industry's  general  health can
 be attributed,  in retrospect, to
 the  rise of  the  Reunion Party,  a
 once not-to-be-believed coalition
 of labor,  public interest groups,
 concerned  scientists, and local
 businessmen.   Industry's response
 was  to form  its own coalition with
 the  25 or more unions represented
 in chemical manufacturing plants
 and  in a few months of  concerted
 effort — and, some inside  ob-
 servers claim, some power plays
 against the few reactionary hold-
 outs within industry councils —
 to come up with an effective self-
 policing scheme that .in  some ways
went beyond what political  deci-
sionmakers were ready to put for-
ward.
   The  Public Health  Councils that
 were set up -- with representation
from industry, unions,  Federal  and
State government, and the public
-- have had the smarts,  the dol-
lars, and the political  muscle  in
Statehouses as well  as on Capitol
Hill  to formulate toxics control
 programs  that  gave  industry  room
 to maneuver  in cost-effective  ways
 and  still maintain  a  degree  of
 public confidence that  dampened
 the  political  fires.  The  Federal
 strategy  of  multimedia  "regulation
 by objective"  (building  on the
 model of  the old bubble  strategy)
 has  provided incentive  and room
 for  innovation in preventive and
 cleanup efforts.
   The industry fell  in  line with
 the  formalized liability and com-
 pensation program,  the  heart of
 which was a  health  insurance pro-
 gram, to which  government  and  in-
 dustry both  contribute and which
 is retroactive  to all workers  em-
 ployed in the  industry after 1950
 for a period greater  than  16
 months.  The big breakthrough  was
 the  ability  to enjoy  health  pro-
 gram benefits  without the  need to
 tie  health effects  directly  to a
 particular site or  incident.   The
 health mediation panels, with  full
 responsibility to assign liability
 and  benefits on an  epidemiological
 statistical  basis,  have cleared
 the  slate of 14,500 cases  of liti-
 gation.
   With the  industry  enjoying  the
 consistency  and clarity of nation-
 wide and industry-wide rules,  and
 freed of some  of the  financial
 risks by national environmental
 health insurance (the Efgar/Neker-
 by Law of 1989) and the accompany-
 ing cap on compensation awards, it
 has moved into an era of unprece-
 dented innovation and prosperity.
 American specialty chemicals domi-
 nate a large proportion of the
world trade  and compete strongly
 in dozens of other niches  in the
 global chemicals market.
   The JIGCCI  profile of the U.S.
 chemical  industry focuses  on this
vast increase  in specialty's share
of chemical   shipments; from 1985-

-------
                                     -25-
 1995  they  report  that specialties
 grew.350%  as a share of value of
 shipments.  The National Specialty
 Chemical Association today effec-
 tively  is  the U.S. chemical indus-
 try.  Bulk or commodity chemicals
 manufacture has moved outside the
 nation's boundaries, but U.S.-
 owned multinationals claim a
 healthy share of  its ownership
 either directly or in productive
 partnership with  a dozen other na-
 tions, many of them Third World
 nations.   In the  meantime, the
 U.S.  has strengthened its position
 in world trade.   The JIGCCI report
 is optimistic about the continued
 dominance  of the  U.S. in special-
 ties, especially  with the rapid
 growth in  use of  composite materi-
 als for construction, transporta-
 tion, and  packaging.  However, in-
 troduction of these new composites
 has created a number of new con-
 cerns, particularly in terms of
 waste disposal, combustion by-
 products in office and residential
 fires, and resistance to recycling
 and remanufacture.  The Toxic
 Chemicals  Data Center reported
 1,871 environmental incidents in-
 volving composites in 1994.
   The biggest uncertainty facing
 the U.S. chemicals industry to-
day is the ultimate impact of bio-
 logicals.   Already making strong
encroachments into the traditional
commodities chemicals- markets, bi-
ologicals are sending specialty
chemicals manufacturers scrambling
 to stake out claims.
   Between 1933 and 1987,  800 new
chemical products  were introduced
 into the market based on microor-
ganism or enzyme  processes which
 in turn were founded upon  genetic
manipulation.   While these were a
profitable, extensive,  part of the
pharmaceutical  and specialty chem-
 ical  industries,  the  real  break-
 through  came  with the opening  by
 ICI-DuPont  of the ethanol-butanol
 facilities  in Nashville,  Tennes-
 see,  and Lagos,  Nigeria,  under
 their cross-licensing arrangements
 signed in 1992.   The  three-cascade
 process, using artificial  genes  in
 two of three  stages,  converts  soft
 woods to alcohol  at an 86% chemi-
 cal efficiency with the capture of
 important by-products.  The most
 significant other step to  commodity
 chemicals from wood has been the
 development of delignon,  an enzyme
 preparation to split  lignin into
 useful chemicals.  On that basis,
 we may anticipate a new family of
 vanillin-based chemicals  entering
 the market  in 1996-97.
 ~ The story  of  the carbochemical
 industry, however, has not been
 all successes.   The global  market
 for biotechnology facilities has
.largely  been  captured by  the Jap-
 anese and the Soviet  Union,  with
 the U.S.  manufacturers  running a
 poor  third.   Industry critics  say
 that  the JIGCCI  report downplays
 the growing Brazilian threats  in
 biology-based commodities.   Janet
 C. Albertson,  Director of  R&D  for
 Crotus,  says,  "Expectations  of
 government  and economists  were way
 out.of line.   While our share  of
 carbocommodities  is growing, the
 Japanese have simply  had  a  lot
 more  time and a  lot more  govern-
 ment  support  than  we  have.   A
 Federal  policy of  pushing  biopro-
 cess  R&D simply doesn't mean that
 the industry  can  shift  overnight."

-------
            -26-
       SCENARIO 2





MULTIDIMENSIONAL CHANGE

-------
                Court decisions
            challenge industry

               Inconsistent  and
           often  contradictory
             state policies on
          victim  compensation,
      environmental standards,
       and occupational health
         have  put the chemical
      industry  into a state of
      near-paranoia.  Although
       many chemical-exporting
       Third World nations  are
      troubled  by economic  and
            political turmoil,
             the  U.S. share of
         world  trade continues
                    to decline.
                      viewpoint 3
         .Biochemical  warfare
                        tetters 5
               weekly price index 13
     Chemical Month. ISSN 2001-1THX/93
•JtS (Including Chemical Specialties and
~~f~*  Chemical Industries), !• published
-\*f I monthly, except for one Issue in
December, by J. F. Costes, Inc. Subscription
races: U.S. and possessions, $99 per year;
alngle copies, S10, Japan, Y2300 per year;
elsewhere on request.  Executive, Editorial,
Circulation, and Advertising Offices: 3718
UiuwKa St., N.U., Washington, D.C.  20015.
Second-class postsge psld at Washington, D.C.
Tltl* not registered at U.S. Patent Office.
                                                  -27-
                                    November 30,1995-Vol.  155, No.  6
                                   10 '•
                                   11
                                   12
13
14
14
15
16
Outlook for state  cooperation  mixed.
National Ass'n of  State Toxic  Controls Agencies meets.

Consolidation in petrochemicals.
Foreign competition  spurs vertical integration.

Right-to-know battles continue.
National chemical  disclosure legislation  fails.

National environmental concern softens.
Critics point to ecology protests in Tennessee,  however.

Sudan leads toxics protest at  U.N.
Claim international  groups have  ignored toxic exports.

Ctippling liability  claims unchecked
Insurance.giants raise rates again.
Industry calls for FederaJ. support of coal research.
Coal -based commodities still  a  promise.
20 markets
   Photovoltaics  a  shining star.
   PV  ion glasses continuing  explosive  growth.
22 specialties
   New corn-based specialties  growing.
   USDA research  on waste utilization pays off.
36 international
   Political turmoil in South  America.
   Industrial terrorism sabotages Brazil's industry.
37 people

-------
                                    -28-
 COURT DECISIONS  RAISE  NEW  QUESTIONS
 ABOUT THE  FUTURE OF  THE  U.S.  CHEMI-
 CALS INDUSTRY
   WASHINGTON, D.C., Ncv. 7 — Two
court decisions dealing with victims
of toxic chemicals grabbed headlines
across the nation last week and
threatened the coalition between
Blacks, Hispanics, and blue collar
workers.
   In New Jersey a court awarded $10
million to families or guardians of
23 people born severely handicapped
in the tiny community of Jake Flats,
between 1981 and 1989.  Jake Flats
lies near the huge chemical facility
built by Opal Chemical Company in
1968 and purchased last year jointly
by IFG and Coolant Chemical.
   "No value," said Judge R. Rath,
"is high enough to compensate these
people or their parents for the loss
of life quality visited on them by
callous corporations  whose only in-
terest was in making  a profit."
Company spokesmen refused comment
pending an appeal.
   Two days later a court in Texas
refused compensation  to workers who
attributed high rates of leukemia,
birth defects, and  heart and nerve
disorders to having worked in the
Gulfstate facility  of Pacific Petro-
chemicals, the world's largest pro-
ducer of galapin.   The state court
ruled that the evidence presented,
which was largely  statistical,  was
persuasive but was  not conclusive
in establishing the necessary cause
and effect relationship between ex-
posure to chemicals and subsequent
health effects in any specific  case.
    Political commentators  suggested
that the disparity  in  awards may
open rifts  between  Hispanics,
Blacks, and union groups who in the
last election were  forged  into a
potent political force  in  a dozen
states, despite their  fierce compe-
tition for  the declining number of
blue collar jobs in those  same
states.  Hispanic community leaders
were indignant at the  reaction of
union reps  in the Northeast, who
blamed the court decision  on the
lack of support by  Hispanic workers
for proposed "right-to-know" and
"safe workplace" laws.  Such laws
were defeated in the Texas legis-
lature three years  ago  despite ex-
haustive effort by  national unions.
The Texas law, had  it been enacted,
would, lawyers say, have meant that
epidemiological evidence presented
in the Albarez case would  have been
accepted in court.
   The New Jersey case  attracted
special attention because  of its
contrast with the Texas case, but
it was by no means  exceptional in
the size of the award.. In the past
two years, at least seven  awards in
excess of $20 mi'llion have been lev-
ied against chemical companies in
the U.S.
   The two decisions this  week high-
lighted the extreme differences in
awards made in different regions,
which 1n turn reflect extreme dif-
ferences in attitudes and  policies
that have developed in different
regions and states since the step-
wise Federal deregulation of the
mid-1980's.  Some states — trying
to lure new high tech industries
and affluent professional  work for-
ces to replace the old, heavy in-
dustries they lost in the  1980's --
have mounted strong cleanup efforts
and accepted rising standards of
environmental  safety.   Other states
have continued to take a hard-nosed

-------
                                     -29-
 no-concessions stand against public
 demands.  This is particularly true
 of states, such as Texas and Louisi-
 ana, where bulk chemical producers
 have been concentrated for decades
 and where the supply of non-union-
 ized labor is reliably replenished
 by immigration.

 Battle Lines Are Drawn
    "Life is full of risks,"  O.B.
 Duracy, Chairman of the Board of
 Global  Petrochemicals, commented
 last week.   "If they (workers)  want
 jobs they have to be ready to get
 their hands dirty.   Otherwise we
 will be forced to robotize those
 jobs that we haven't already auto-
 mated."
    Such statements, industry cri-
 tics say, are responsible for in-
 creasing radicalism within some
 public interest groups.  Public
 health advocates called Duracy's
 comment "a naked threat of repri-
 sal."  The National Society  for
 Safety  through  Environmental  Enforce-
 ment, NSSTEE,  (pronounced  "nasty")
 an  "environmental guerilla"  band of
 activists,  has  claimed or  been
 charged  by  the  FBI  with  frequent
 acts of  violence against chemical
 plants and  corporation  executives,
 ranging  from bomb threats  to  the
 kidnapping  and  non-fatal poisoning
 last year of Ian Hiez,  President of
 Quik, a  pesticide manufacturing com-
 pany.   Industry  spokesmen  say the
 FBI  figures for  sabotage directed
 at chemical companies  are  too low
 by at least a factor of  two; they
 blame some apparent "unintentional
 releases" of pollutants and trans-
 port accidents involving chemicals
on undetected terrorist acts or in-
 ternal sabotage by malcontent wor-
kers.
   This conflict and the fear of
additional liabilities or compensa-
tion suits are said by some chemi-
cal  executives to reinforce the
 strong  trend  toward  locating  new
 facilities  "off-shore,"  i.e.  in
 other countries,  including  Latin
 America.  This  threat remains po-
 tent, especially  within  the commo-
 dity chemicals  industry, despite
 the perpetual political  turmoil
 that has  so far frustrated  plans
 by Saudi  Arabia and  other Third
 World countries to develop  major
 chemical  industries."  In the U.S.
 world-class facilities have been
 built only  in Alaska,  Texas,  and
 Louisiana in  the  last two decades.
 Overall, most of  the growth in the
 industry  has  been in specialty
 chemicals,  in which  this country
 with its  strong scientific  base has
 a commanding  lead.
   Investment specialist John  Beard
of Johnson Sears,  Inc., warns  that
the U.So share  in  world chemicals
trade is still declining.  The U.S.
is also said to be falling behind in
R&D directed at alternative feed-
stocks,  despite its  advantage  in
plentiful  supplies of coal and wood,
the two most likely  prospects.  Chem-
ical  producers have  been lulled by
the collapse of OPEC and by the gene-
ral  dismantling of Federal environ-
mental  regulatory  agencies.   Environ-
mental and public health  advocates
 recognize that  coal-based chemicals
will bring with them a host of new
and poorly understood risks to pub-
 lic health.  Neither are  anxious to
speed up the long-range  conversion
to alternative  or supplementary
feedstocks, although most agree
that it will have to come in  the
next quarter-century.
   European nations   —and  ironical-
ly, Japan which has  neither coal nor
wood — have consistently higher R
-------
                                      -30-
ducing R&D budgets and concentrating
on high profitability lines.  For-
eign companies are moving into U.S.
markets to fill inviting niches,
while U.S. companies are busily di-
versifying into non-chemical pro-
ducts.
   The backlog of victim compensa-
tion cases continues to grow des-
pite the fact that most chemical
companies, especially those with
new and modern facilities, now re-
use or destroy on site most of
their undesirable byproducts.  The
volume of cases grows because of
unfolding understanding of subtle
and long-delayed physiological and
neurological effects of the first
four decades of the chemical revo-
lution.  Advances in testing, toxi-
cology, and epidemiology suggest
that these effects will  continue to
be discovered.

New Trouble

   In July the latest epidemiologi-
cal survey of 200,000 American
households was completed, and the
news is not likely to be good.  Ex-
pectations are that the final report,
when issued, will  suggest a strong
tie between Virus A2, thought to be
responsible for Alzneimer's Disease,
and a facilitation of demyelination
of the nerves' protective sheath
giving access to the virus.   The
most common organic chemical asso-
ciated with O'Neal's opening is Bi-
lazine, the common foaming agent in
polyhackalones.   The first itera-
tion of the biennial epidemiologi-
cal survey, in 1986, tied 13 toxic
organic materials to widespread
overload of immunological systems.
That news almost derailed the Fede-
ral deregulation proposals then
pending in Congress; but they were
rammed through while medical ex-
perts and toxicologists  were still
wrangling over subtle points in
 the conclusions.  The latest sur-
 vey results are almost surely going
 to have an even stronger political
 impact.
    The Federal Interagency Chemi-
 cals Safety Committee, the chief
 remaining relic of Federal legis-
 lation in this field, has no imple-
 mentation or enforcement authority
 but has nevertheless taken a strong
 role in advising, warning, and hel-
 ping state and regional  agencies.
 FICSC, familiarly called "Fix", is
 universally given credit for the
 fact that 32 states have now adop-
 ted the Toxics Control  Uniform
 Code and joined in interstate agree-
 ments on a variety of subjects from
 waste handling to transport of ha-
 zardous materials to facility sit-
 ing.   "Take that with a  grain of
 salt," warns Charlie Jones, Western
 Co-chairman of the Association of
 State Toxic Controls Enforcement
 Agencies.   He  points out  that some
 of the major chemicals producing
 states have not accepted  the  code.
 However,  one big  holdout,  Louisi-
 ana,  is reported  to  be about  to
 join,  with the urging of  the  Big
 Six  producers, who according  to
 Jones  are  coming  to  see  it  in their
 own  interests  to  lower the  level  of
 conflict.
   While  the chemical  industry  re-
 mains  officially  against  nearly  all
 proposed  laws  and  regulations,
 claiming that  the  industry  itself
 will do a more  innovative and cost-
 effective job  of protecting the  pub-
 lic if  it  is left  to develop  "good
 business" procedures  (the popular
 buzz word for  self-policing), many
 progressive leaders within the in-
dustry are already said to be sup-
porting the "Fix" and the states in
pushing interstate regulations.
 "It would be a great advantage to
us," one high corporate official

-------
                                     -31-
 says, "to have more consistent stan-
 dards,  that applied everywhere and
 that our competitors also  had  to
 abide by."
 Spectre of Federal  Regulation
    The  real reason  that the  chemi,-
 cal industry is beginning  to be
 significantly more  amenable  to po-
 licy makers and regulators at  the
 State level, other  observers say,
 is the  fear of another strong  popu-
 lar movement to re-institute Feder-
 al controls.  That  possibility be-
 comes stronger with each new reve-
 lation, or allegation, of  a  commu-
 nity epidemic traced to chemical
 contamination, although it will
 be costly to rebuild a regulatory
 structure from the  ground  up.
    Specialty process chemistry sup-
 pliers, with new, efficient, and
 generally small  scale plants that
 incorporate processes to use
 or destroy up to 98% of their  dan-
 gerous  byproducts,  might be  relieved
 by Federal  re-regulation that  as-
 sured them of consistent treatment
 and protected them  against excessive
 liability.   In  the  meantime  they
 work  hard  at  separating  themselves
 in the  public mind  and  in  legal re-
 lationships  from the  bulk manufac-
 turers  and  the makers of pesticides
 that are widely spread over  the en-
 vironment.
    The  trigger for  re-establishment
 of  Federal controls-, however, may
 ultimately come not from public
 pressure or industry despair  but
 from the international scene.  "We
 can simply not continue," said  Sen-
 ator Hawk  last week in Foreign  Af-
 fairs Committee hearings, "to give
 fuel to our enemies  and alienate
 our potential friends by spreading
our poison around the globe."  Twen-
 ty-five South American and  African
countries will meet  this week to
consider a trade embargo against
U.S. owned multinationals and affil-
iates in retaliation for the catas-
trophe in Niger last week, when 325
people died as a result of infiltra-
tion of 2,4-dinitropuzzilidine, a
soil-treating agent produced by a
U.S. company, into village wells.
   If the Congress seriously con-
siders a new TSCA (block grants to
the states in 1987 replaced the Toxic
Substances Control Act) it may well
take as its model the new Comprehen-
sive Risk Reduction Legislation of
Alaska.  This set of related laws
was passed in connection with the
building of world-class chemical
production facilities in the late
1980's.  Government, industry, pub-
Tic interest groups, and unions,
and even representatives of other
nations and migratory peoples around
the northern global  perimeter, took
part in their development.
The-two year process of negotiation
and mediation reminded observers of
a SALT conference or the old Law of
the Sea negotiations, but it has re-
sulted in a period of political con-
sensus and industry innovation that
the nation as a whole can only hope
to achieve.

-------
    -32-
SCENARIO 3





STABILITY

-------
CHECKLIST
            -33-

 CHEmiUREC
 NOVEMBER  1995
     Environmental  concern:
          stronger  than  ever

             The toxic gene?
      And  in  this  corner...
          Toxicology in  vivo
  650
  D

  652
  D
  658
  D

  663
  a
The professional  operations  of  the  new
environmental consortia  are  explored by  Chen,

The successes and  failures of TSCA  and
biotechnology;  Krantz makes  a judgement.

Industry-public interest battles continue
over risk  in regulation; Shelby calls it.

Biomedical  analytical devices promise
human  detoxification.   Joffer talks tech.
                                    668
    Economics  and  chemistry


  Optimism among  the  stats    pi
  D

  670
Why the move away  from  petroleum has been
slow;  Albertson provides answers.

Third  World commodities growth  provides
gap for U.S. regrowth.   Rieger  shows why.
     Screen  tests  for  genes
                                    676
   International  regulation    682


   Chemistry  in the economy:   693
      growth  steady but slow   D
                                    698
                                    D
         Now  that genetic screening  is  institution-
         alized,  Smith looks  ahead to  gene therapy.
         U.S.  example paves  the way  for  international
         right-to-know.   O'Drain  says  it's good.

         After stabilizing  in the late  1980's, U.S*
         chemical  exports slip again.    Brown  investigates,
 641  The Industrial ChymJsl
 D
  645  Heart Cut
  D
                             690   The Science of the Possible
                             D
 642  Write On
 D
  648  View from the Top
                                    D
                            OBC  The Last Word
                             D
Volume 35, No. II, pages 64|-70b ISSN
1138-1984 JFCCHH
CHEWJREC (ISSN 1138-1984) is published
monthly by J. f.  Coates, Inc.,  at 3738
Kanawha St., N.W., Washington,  O.C.
20015. Second-class postage paid at
Washington, O.C.  POSTMASTER: Send
address changes to Subscription Services
3738 Kanawha St,  N.W., Washington. 0 C
20015
Subscriptions «  1-year prices: Client,
142; Nonclients (individual personal
use) 162; Companies, instituions, 1 ibrarles
1172, Students, $12; Foreign postage $J2
idditiona.l/year.  Space freight add $100.
Send payment to J. F. Coates,  Inc.. 3738
Kanawha St., N.W., Washington. O.C. 20015
Single copies, $22.  Phone orders can be
placed for printed, microfiche, and mag-
tape editions by  calling the sales office
. continental U.S.  Visa or Mastertaro
 accepted. Rates above do not apply to
 nonmember subscribers in Japan, who enter
 subscriptions with Godzilla Co, Ltd.,
 1-30 Nllon mashi 4-chrome, Cho-kyo,
 Tokyo 666, Japan; (09)727-1125.

 Editorial matters: Refer alt editorial
 matters to V. T, Coates. Editor, CHEMWREC,
 3738 Kanawha St., N.W., Washington, O.C.
 20015; (202) 966-9307.
 Advertising: Frontier, Ltd., M. Killon,
 Pres.. 25 Glade Way, Reston, VA 22222;
 (703) 123-4567.
 Service:  For change of address, send old
 label with new address to J. F. Coates, Inc.
 Client Services, 3738 Kanawha St.,  N.W.,
 Washington, O.C.  20015. Allow 8 weeks  to
 effect change.  Refer claims for missing
 Issues, information on status of accounts.
                           notice of address change was not received
                           in specific  time; (b)North American cUif
                           was made 30  days beyond issue date; (c)
                           your check is overdue.
                           Disclaimer:  J. F. Coates,  Inc., assumes
                           no responsibility for opinions advanced
                           by contributors to Its publications.
                           Views expressed in the Editorials arc
                           those of the author and do not necessari),
                           represent the official positions of J. F.
                           Coates, Inc.

                           Reproductions: To obtain reprint permission,
                           contact V, T. Coates, J. F. Coates, Inc.,
                           3738 Kanawha St., N.W., Washington, O.C.
                           20015; (202) 966-9307.  For works copyrighted
                          ,by J. f. Coates, Inc., free permission will
                           be granted to make copies  for personal or
                           internal use.  This permission does not apply
                           to copying for promotional purposes or resale.

-------
                                      -34-
 CEQ'S SILVER ANNIVERSARY BASH IN
 DENVER:
 A Quarter Century of Continuity
 With Change

    DENVER, Nov.9 — The 25th  Anni-
 versary of The Council  on Environ-
 mental  Quality was celebrated today.
 Environmental  Quality,  1995,  was de-
 livered with some fanfare yesterday
 at Denver headquarters  to a crowd of
 1200.  The seven-man commission (ex-
 panded from the original three in
 1990) held a two-hour press  confer-
 ence, followed by a 7-hour symposium
 and celebration.  'Chairman John
 McLeod in his retrospective  hailed
 as the major organizational  develop-
 ment in environmental  management the
 movement from FederaJ  dominance to  a
 tripartite arrangement  in which  Fed-
 eral, State,  and international or-
 ganizations collectively and  inter-
 actively  manage  local,  national,
 and global  environment.   Organiza-
 tional  change  began  in  the early
 '80's,  with somewhat, questionable
 and mixed  ideological support.  The
 push  for more  State  regulation and for
 public  participation and  local con-
 trol  steadily  shifted actions from
 the Federal  government  to State and
 local levels.  Today, in  contrast
 to  a  quarter century ago, almost all
 waste control, waste hazard manage-
 ment, and  landsiting problems are
 the responsibilities of  State or lo-
 cal  level  authority,,  Federal  govern-
 ment  is to  a great extent in a medi-
 ation and conciliation role,  a knowl-
 edge  generator through research and
 development, and liaison and coordi-
 nator on international affairs.
    International regulatory bodies
 building basically on the American
experience have increasingly  assumed
 regulatory control over the deep
oceans and the atmosphere, the Arc-
tic, Antarctic and most of the un-
supervised lands of the developing
 nations.   The UNEP (United Nations
 Environmental Program)  of the early
 '80's  has  flowered into several  de-
 rivative organizations, the UNEM
 (United Nations  Environmental  Moni-
 torship),  the UNEIP  (United Nations
 Environmental Inspection Program)
 and  the UNMO  (the  United Nations
 Mediation  Office).
   Chairman McLeod pointed out the
 enormous progress  in  development of
 what in the  (60's'and '70's would
 have been  called cost-benefit  analy-
 sis  into a complex program of  socio-
 economic evaluation  in  which routine-
 ly our multidimensional  analyses are
 presented  to  Federal, State, or  Lo-
 cal  Advisory  Bodies.  The advisory
 comments are  becoming increasingly
 relied upon by Federal  agencies,
 governors, county  officials, and
 mayors.  The  growth of  the Cable
 Net  has tremendously  facilitated
 public discussions.   Commissioner
 McLeod reported  that  on  a typical
 evening, 600  discussions  of. environ-
 mental problems  are going  on around
 the  country.  Over the  last three
 years, 7,000  specific environmental
 issues have been discussed.  The Li-
 brary of'Congress  in  a  recent  poll
 found 33^% of LAB's issues  have  been
 satisfactorily resolved  by  Federal
 or State agencies without  further
 challenge or  litigation.
   McLeod  threw  bouquets  right and
 left, especially to the  state  ad-
 visory and  consulting functions  and
 the mediation teams routinely  sup-
 plied by EPA  to State agencies.  As
McLeod put it, cooperation  is  the
order of the  day.  "We can  celebrate
 the passage of our environmental era
of travail,"   he said.
   Two commissioners, Mary  Smith,
representing  the affiliation of  in-
dustrial  workers, and George Jones,
of the Environmental  Cooperative,

-------
                                      -35-
the nation's largest consortium of
environmental organizations, in their
own presentations, demurred gracious-
ly but unequivocally from McLeod's
position.  They pointed out that
there are still major State and Fed-
eral problems having to do with
cleanup of waste, the management of
the slowly but inevitably growing
biotechnology business, the questi-ons
,of compensations and the key issue of
right to full disclosure.  Jones no-
ted that the major organizational de-
velopment over the last 10 years in
his view was a formation of the OSHA/
EPA Joint Regulatory Teams.  They now
routinely have assumed many of the
regulatory functions without any need
for new legislation.
   The second greatest development
in the last decade, according to
McLeod, was the rise of the regional
advisory teams, representing indus-
try, government, public interest
groups, and local municipalities.
What has been particularly interest-
ing is in those states contiguous to
Mexico and Canada, foreign organiza-
tions are increasingly represented
on these Councils.
   Problems still reported to be
intractable in Environmental Quali-
ty. 1995,.are getting things sorted
out with military cleanup, and our
nuclear waste disposal, a spotty,
irksome question.  The reclamation
of aquifers and our waste incinera-
tion at sea are nettlesome issues.
   Environmental Quality, 1995, re-
cites the principal structural chan-
ges in the chemical industry since
1985.  McLeod talked about the gen-
eral effects of integrating industry
from the environmental point of view
and of the propagation of American
environmental standards around the
world.  He did note, however, the
relative decline in U.S. trade posi-
tion, the developing of chemical
 commodity industries  in  the Third
 World and the  increase in  the  ten-
 dency of the European economic com-
 munity to export high value added
 chemical products to  the United
 States.  The McLeod briefing called
 for Congressional oversight hearings
 on this question.  Several distin-
 guished participants at  the sympo-
 sium expressed suspicions  that ra-
 ther than tarnish the 25th Anniver-
 sary, McLeod glossed over our ser-
 ious trade issues.   He neglected to
 mention, although there  is a whole
 chapter in the report dedicated to
 the question ,  international owner-
 ship of the U.S.  chemical industry
 which has been slowly increasing.
    McLeod cited as  one of the great
 causes for celebration,  going along
 with the internationalization of
 American environmental and health
 standards,  multilingual  soft-
 ware packages propagated  around the
 world.   EPA  now routinely brings
 1,000  interns from  around the world
 to  training  programs  at American
 universities  and  in  the Federal  agen-
 cy  itself.
    Turning closer to  the  present,
 McLeod  highlighted  some possible  de-
 velopments and  some  significant a-
 chievements.  He celebrated the mel-
 ting away of  corporate obduracy,  to
 self-policing.  He celebrated the
 establishment of the  Clark-Johnson
 Bill providing  retroactive  health
 care benefits for workers  in chemi-
 cally related industries  who develop
 any one of 37 disorders epidemiolo-
 gically attributable  to chemical
 products.  He cited the great success
 in the introduction of photovoltaics
 in spite of the three year  halt in
 the propagation of photovoltaics un-
 til the environmental  safety of amor-
 phous materials was fully satisfied.
 Acknowledging that it did give an
 edge to Japanese manufacturers, he
 nevertheless felt that the environ-
mental preservation is well worth
 the cost.

-------
                 -36-
   Citing  some future problems,  he
 raised concerns coming out of the
 national epidemiclogical monitoring
 systems, particularly with regard to
 health implications of chemicals on
 birth defects, aging and neurologi-
 cal behavior.  He cited the substan-
 tial steps yet to be made in substi-
 tuting mediation and arbitration for
 litigation and he cited the yet  to
 be passed and implemented National
 Land Bill Act which will require
 land siting statements with regard
 to all new industrial and chemical
 productions facilities.
   McLeod was particularly pleased
with the folding into EPA/OSHA of
 regulations that controlled biotech-
 nology.  He cited as a possible prob-
 lem the 49% decline in new materials
 introduced into the American econo-
my over the past 15 years.
   The full CQ Report is available :
from the Government Printing Office
for $37.50.  It is  available on In-
ternat Cable call up for 3 cents per
hour, and it is available on micro-
fiche and video-disc at the standard
rates of $1.00 per  hour.   Write to
the National  Environmental  Informa-
tion Center,  Denver, for details.

-------
                                -37-
                            GHAPTER 3

         THE CHANGING PATTERNS OF THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY


          The U.S. chemical industry is maturing.  While
          strong and profitable, it faces growing compe-
          tition for world markets and rising costs of
          feedstock, production, and risk management.
          There is a strong'trend toward divesting less
          profitable product lines, especially basic
          commodity chemicals, toward diversification,
          and toward specialty chemicals for future
          growth.  Maintaining U.S. position in world
          trade will be a major priority. Increasing
          investment overseas, with continuing over-
          capacity in the U.S., is likely.
             General industry strategy is to reduce
          costs and seek profitability with reduced
          risk taking. R4D investment is rising slowly;
          emphasis is on product improvement and select-
          ed new technologies, mostly bioengineering.
          Average plant size may decrease; location
          patterns will be relatively stable with
          some tendency to move closer to the wellhead.
          By the end of the decade there may be sig-
          nificant movement toward coal  and biomass
          as feedstocks, introducing new environmental
          regulatory concerns.  The overwhelmingly
          important management problems  of the next
          decade will be waste reduction and disposal
          and management of risk and liability. Both
          will be major cost factors in  decisions.


A.  INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

1.  The Importance of the Chemical Industry to the U.S. hcononvy

     The U.S. chemical industry represents a significant and

positive force in the economy; it is the fourth largest U.S.

manufacturing industry.  Many other industries, such as steel and

housing construction industries, are highly dependent on chemicals

(see Exhibit 2).  Chemical products are  an important factor in our

international trade (Exhibit 3).

-------
                                   -SB-
                                 EXHIBIT  2
          MATERIALS  AND  PRODUCT  FLOW OF  CHEMICAL  INDUSTRY
                          CHEMICAL RAW MATERIALS
      Agricultural
      coflinodit ies
Coal Tar
product s
Pet ro leum
& Natural
Metallic
  ores
Non-met.11 Iic
   ores
                 Organics
        Industrial
         gases
                                           Inorganics
                     BASIC AND INTERMEDIATE CHEMICALS
    Functional Chemical Products
     Polymers
     Agricultural chemicals
     Medlcinals
     Industrial and institutional
       cleaners
     Explosives
     Adheslves
     Automotive chemicals
     Oil-field chemicals
     Catalysts
     Other
                         Chemical  Additives .mil
                           Processing Aids	
                         Colors
                         Surfactants
                         Flavors and fr.l^r
                         Carbon hi.irk
                         B i oc i dp .s
                         Thickening  .ifieni *
                         Fl .ime r*'t .irdani s
                         UV stabilizers
                         Fond  additives
                         Paper chemicals
                         Other
1
f
Process ing
Metals
I't't role-urn

ri'f i n in>j.
Pu 1 p ,ind paper
T«-xr i IPS
hi>"d prm i-

SS|»K
Class* scone * ;md
c lay product s








i


F


Wood prnduf f s
l\-x. ilr p
M.tch i nt-ry
«duff .s
.intl
cqu ipmt-nf
P.iprr jirtK


IK r s










y
N
UK
Mini iif>
Aj»r i i n) f or.) J
Korcs try
F i shcr t t*s
Canst rut1 ( i on
Pot rolcum n-cnvrrv

N.i ( i utiii 1 Kt'nui'fliy No i'd •%
Knod

C 1 u( li i n^

Moti.s itiK

Hi-Uu -»l i -ire

M,.u>,-lu.|,!
Opt' f.l 1 1 i^ll^
K»-. i'.- t - i - •

.

Source:   George W.  Ingle,  ed., TSCA's  Impact  on  Society
and Chemical  Industry,  ACS Symposium  Series  213,
Washington,  D.C.:  American Chemical Society,  1983,  p. 24.

-------
                               -39-
                            EXHIBIT 3
            UNITED STATES TRADE BALANCE IN CHEMICALS
                  U.S. Chemical Trade Balance
                         ($ billions)

exports
imports
balance
E/I*
1982
19.89
9.49
10.39
2. .09
1981
21.20
9.60
11.60
2.21
1980
20.74
8.58
12.16
2.42
1979
17.31
7.49
9.82
2.31
1978
12.62
6.43
6.19
1.96
1972
11 .71
6.27
5.44
1.77
     Source:  Chemical & Engineering News, June 13, 1983, p.54
     *E/I = Export/Import Ratio

     The chemical:industry is  maturing.    The strong growth pat-
terns of the past, perturbed by the economic recession, are now
confronting increasingly complex changes in markets, products,
and technologies.  Many modifications and improvements have been
made to bring plants  into compliance with increasing government
regulations and with  variables of feedstock availability and con-
sumer product demand.  Future changes may be more challenging
and costly for the industry.  With the maturity of the industry,
corporate management  may also become more risk averse and more
oriented toward immediate profits rather than long-term growth.
     The cost of doing business will increase.  Forces driving
these costs include:
     — increasing costs of  manpower, new facilities,  transpor-
        tation, financing, machinery, and analytical instruments-,
     -- increasing costs and possibly decreasing quality and
        quantity of certain  energy and feedstock sources, namely,
        natural  gas,  petroleum, and certain ores;
     -- increasing societal  pressure and environmental regula-
        tion for additional  pollution monitoring and removal
        equipment, modifications and development of equipment

-------
                               -40-
        processes to lower hazardous chemical production, and
        abandonment of older processes and plants that cannot
        be readily modernized.
     Foreign competition will increase.  The U.S. global market
share of the chemical trade is decreasing.  Lower energy and raw
material costs, cheaper labor rates, less regulation, and growing
markets in Third World countries will encourage a shift in produc-
tion to oil- and gas-rich developing nations.  This trer.d may be
particularly important for basic, large-volume chemicals,
although the large domestic market argues that the U.S. will con-
tinue to produce bulk chemicals.  The U.S. will maintain its lead
in production of specialty chemicals due to its scientific and
technological strength.
     New profit-optimizing strategies are emerging because of the
trends noted above.   Low profit enterprises are being shed,
management is being reorganized, diversification into non-chemical
areas is increasing, movement to more profitable foreign locations
is increasingly attractive, the workforce is being reduced, and
the emphasis on high-profit products -- specialty chemicals -- is
growing.
     The economic recession of 1980-82 is the immediate and
visible cause of some of these changes, but most would, or should,
have come about in any case as the chemical industries reach
maturity after four decades of rapid growth, and as they respond
to growing foreign competition.
     The chemical  industries have always been at the forefront of
process automation.   New uses of computers and telecommunications
for control, monitoring, information processing, R&D, modeling,
and plant design are rapidly being adopted.  Further applications
of computers and robotics, will  present new challenges and oppor-
tunities for the industry.
     There  is no standard  definition  of "commodity  chemicals."
They are here considered to be  chemicals  (a)  that  are  bought  and
sold, with  many suppliers  so that (b)  there is  price  competition,

-------
                               -41-
and (c) they are used at basic or intermediate stages of manufac-
turing.  The following chracteristics generally apply at present to
the U.S. commodity chemical industry.
     •  capital, energy, feedstock, and R&D/technology intensive;
     •  established distributing and servicing networks;
     •  global  operations;
     •  high plant and equipment investment in contrast to low
        labor content in cost of manufacture;
     •  highly  skilled workforce;
     •  high growth rate in past dependent on commodity chemicals
        (future growth potential may depend on specialty chemi-
        cals);
     •  integrated plant complexes;
     •  world scale capacity plants for commodity chemical produc-
        tion (current capacity, however, exceeds global demands);
     •  chemical plant sites near sources of raw material  (raw
        materials represent over 50% of manufacturing costs, and
        industry outputs are highly dependent on their supply,
        availability, and price);
     t  world's largest producer of organic commodity chemicals;
     •  competitive posit/ion based on low price, ready availabil-
        ity, and high purity of commodity chemicals;
     •  signs of industry maturation and structural change on
        horizon.
     This report focuses almost entirely on organic chemicals, be-
cause concern about toxic substances, and OTS regulatory activities,
are now focused on organics.  In the future, it should be  noted,
inorganic chemicals are likely to get more attention; already there
is growing concern about heavy metals, and the increasing  use of
catalysts.
     The growth rate of commodity organic chemicals has been declin-
ing for the past three decades: 1950's ~ 17%; 1960's — 13%; and
1970's — 4.6%.  The growth projection for the 1980's is 4%, only
slightly above  the projected growth of the GNP (2.8%).  Growth in
petrochemical sales is projected to be higher than growth  in many
basic industries, but lower than in the past. (1)*  But probably
      References are grouped by chapter at the end of the  report.

-------
                               -42-
more revealing is the declining ability of the  industry  over the
same time periods to rapidly penetrate  end markets  or  create new
end markets.  (2)  This indicates a  maturing industry.
     Part of the problem for the U.S.  commodity chemicals industry
lies with the prospects for economic vitality of its major customers
-- energy producers, automobiles, housing, textiles, steel and
appliances.   High interest rates, availability of capital, domestic
and foreign 'economic downturns, increased production capacity,
value of the U.S. dollar, active foreign government involvement in
commodity chemicals, etc. will  affect the rehabilitation of the
chemical industry customers and, in turn, future growth  prospects
for the industry.
    In 1984, with recovery from the recession well  underway, opti-
mism was rising.  Data Resources, Inc., forecast a  growth of "real"
(1972 dollars) GNP of 5.4%, with growth in industrial  production
of nearly 10%.  On this basis,  chemical shipments were forecast to
increase 9.4% over 1983, with the industry operating at  81.3% of
capacity, an  increase of 8.4% over  1983's average operating rate.  (3)
2.  The Chemical Industry and World Trade
     Global  trends that are expected to affect  future  U.S. business
operations in general include:   (4)
     — Increasing integration  of the global  economy,  including the
        integration of China and Russia in international  trade and the
        increasing industrialization of developing  and newly industrialized
        countries (NICs), thereby opening new markets  and creating cheap
        labor and raw material  competition for  many products;
     -- Internationalization of science, with nearly every country in
        the world now having a  top  layer of Western-trained scientists
        and technologists;
     -- Increasing  political  instability as the gap between the have and
        have-not countries  widens;
     — Erosion  of  American dominance of international business (in 1963,
        two-thirds  of the 100 largest multinationals were American; now
        fewer  than  half  are  U.S.  owned);

-------
                              -43-
     --  International pollution, problems of environmental maintenance,
         the trans-border flow of pollutants, and pollution of common
         resources, which are becoming increasingly urgent issues within
         and among nations;

     --  Attempts to restrict transnational data flow, raising questions
         of national security, economic stability, political stability,
         protection of private property, civil rights, etc.;
     —  A new wave of automation via computer-assisted design, computer-
         assisted manufacturing, and industrial robotics, which raise the
         threat of structural unemployment but also promise to bring the
         benefits of automation to batch and custom manufacturing;

     —  Barter and countertrade, rapidly becoming practices as a result
         of the worldwide recession;
     —  Widespread use of computers, telecommunications, and remote sensing;

     —  Continuing political instability and recurring inter-
         national  crises, especially in the next decade;

     —  Increasing terrorism, long associated with nationalism,
         irredentism,  and revolutionary activities, and now
         possible protests against environmental pollution.  It
         is very possible that the threat of contamination may be
         used as a mechanism of terrorism.

     These trends specifically affect chemical companies.  Chemi-

cals, particularly primary and intermediate organic chemicals, are

important contributors to the U.S.  export performance

and chemical  industry profits, and an increasing proportion of

domestic chemical production has  been exported. (5)

However, a number of  factors will  tend to moderate the rate of
growth  of exports of  U.S. commodity chemicals:

     •   continued near-term reliance on petroleum and natural  gas;

     •   lower demand  for organic  chemical-dependent products  by
        chemical  industry customers, such  as automobile manufac-
        turer, building  construction,  fibers, plastics industries;

     •   domestic  and  foreign economic pressures and currency  valu-
        ations;

     •   protectionist barriers;

     •   emergence of   Saudi  Arabia  and Mexico  as major  com-
        modity chemical  manufacturers;

     •    chemical  industry industrialization plans and  expansion
         strategies of NICs  such as  Brazil,  Korea,  Mexico  and  Taiwan;
         and

-------
                               -44-
     •  industry nationalization and State/Government ownership
        and direction of industry and industry economic incentives
        in some countries.  (6)
     As a  result of  these and other factors, suci. as the strong value
of the U.S. dollar,  U.S. position in world trade is eroding.  The
chemicals  trade surplus fell  from $14 billion in 1981 to just over
$8-bill ion in 1983.  (7)
     World trade rose throughout the 1970's, but dropped 11% from
1981 to 1982 due to  the world recession. (8)  International trade
will increase slowly as the global economy improves.
     Mergers, acquisitions, and nationalizations are expected to
alter the composition of the  top 30 international chemical  compa-
nies during the next 5-10 years.  One estimate is that half of
these firms will be  located outside the U.S. and the EEC. (9)
     The countries hit hardest by the recent recession are  West
Germany, Japan, and Great Britain.  According to the National Eco-
nomic Development Office (London), there is a shift of commodity
chemicals away from the advanced countries. (10)  Inorganics, fer-
tilizers, and petrochemicals  will be affected most.  The chemical
industry in many industrialized nations will decline or change as
a result.
     Availability and price of feedstocks and energy will influ-
ence location decisions, especially for energy intensive basic
commodities.   In addition,  there will be a tendency to concentrate
production close to new demand centers — areas of increasing
population and industrial  and agricultural growth.  This will mean
increasing shifts in markets  and production toward the developing
and newly industrialized countries (NIC),  some  of which  are  already
planning on building world class  facilities.
     While some LDC's and NIC's have delayed development of world
class chemical  facilities due to the recession, worldwide capacity
in basic commodity chemicals  is expected to increase through the
late 1980's. (11)

-------
                               -45-
     Government ownership, direct subsidies, and low-cost financ-
ing will increasingly enable foreign competitors to sell chemical
products below U.S. prices. (12)  The motivation driving many for-
eign firms is changing from profits to concerns of employment, na-
tional development, and foreign currency exchange management.
     New survival strategies are emerging for traditional chemical
producers.  British Petroleum's recent activities are exemplary of
a larger industry trend toward streamlining their activities, re-
ducing low-profitability enterprises.  British Petroleum is focus-
ing on three business areas: polyethylene, acetyls, and alcohols.
It is cutting manpower by 40%; closing 16 less profitable plants;
and getting out of polyvinyl chloride production. (13)
     Following are some examples of the pressures from industri-
alized and developing countries that will influence the U.S. com-
modity chemical  industry competitiveness over the next several
years.
Developed Nations
     European chemical companies complain about competition from
the U.S.  They have, however, also suffered in recent years from
inflation and recession.  Emphasis in 1983 was on reducing excess
capacity — exports and earnings dropped in Great Britain, France,
and West Germany. (14)  Most European companies expected to invest
less in 1983 than in previous years. (15)
     The response of the European chemical  industry to these pres-
sures will  probably be considerably fewer producers in the com-
modity chemical  marketplace and an industrial  movement to higher
value added chemical products,,
     Japanese companies also had very low growth in 1983 and ex-
pect little or none in 19848 (16)
     World scale production facilities being built in Canada will
eventually provide substantial competition  for U.S. commodity chem-
ical  industry in the future.  In time, Canada  may even double its
share of world production, particularly of commodity chemicals such

-------
                                -46-
as ethylene, benzene, polyethylene, styrene, etc.  (17)   There is
talk of building a new petrochemical  industry in the Maritime
Provinces when world markets improve  to take advantage  of oil
fields off the shores of Nova Scotia "and Newfoundland.  (18)
      Saudi  Arabia may become a significant competitive factor in
the global production and trade of commodity chemicals, according
to experts,  but much depends on the future economic and political
stability of the area. (19)   The large oil  companies are likely
to be reluctant to build in  this potentially troubled spot.
      Mexico's chemical  industry is dependent on imports of  critical
 materials and equipment, which cannot be bought with nearly worth-
 less pesos.  Brazil's chemical  industry also has  suffered from in-
 flation and the debt crisis.  In spite of this, as more developing
 nations industrialize the Latin American petrochemicals markets
 will grow.  (20)
      From 1970 to 1980, the developing nations  of the  world in-
 creased their share of  world chemical  exports by  39%,  from  4,6% to
 6.4%, according to a 1982 U.N,  study.   The leading area in  this
 growth was  Asia, with one half of its  exports accounted for by.
 four nations  — Korea,  Taiwan,  Singapore,  and Hong Kong0  (21)
 Other developing nations have been the fastest  growing markets
 for the increased exports of developing nations.

 B.   THE DOMESTIC CHEMICAL INDUSTRY
 1.   Industry  Strategies
      During the recession,  U.S.  chemical  companies shut down many
 of  their unprofitable,  marginally profitable, or  low-growth lines.
 Basic commodities plants were the target for most divestitures;
 many were shut down or  sold to  companies with diverse  product
 lines,  (22)

-------
                               -47-
     Chemical companies have restricted new business efforts to
areas where technological advances permitted cost reduction or en-
couraged development of new products.  New growth areas included
engineering plastics, catalysts, electronic chemicals, and other
specialty chemicals.  There were distinct signs of a movement away
from hydrocarbons, heavy organics, chloral kali plant products,
and thermoplastics, (23)  Many chemical companies realigned corporate
management to achieve tighter control of their operations.
     The end of the recession in late 1983 brought more optimistic
expectations for 1984 as housing and automobile sales began to rise.
However, trade magazines also expected chemical companies to monitor
inventories strictly and to keep a tight rein on plant and equipment
expenditures. (24)  The large Federal budget and the threat of a new
rise  in interest rates were factors in this caution, but the largest
factor may have been the continuing slide in the chemical trade bal-
ance.  Other restraining forces were uncertainty over U.S. trade
policy, the effects of decontrol of natural  gas prices, and the pos-
sibility of new environmental legislation, especially the amendments
likely to be proposed to TSCA (such as mandatory premarket toxi-
cological testing of chemicals). (25)
     Production.  A combination of overcapacity, lower demand, and
lower productivity have recently marked the  commodity chemical in-
dustry during the general  economic recession from 1980 through
1983, and was reflected in declining production.  The 1982 output
of chemicals and synthetic fibers was 14% lower than the 1981  out-
put and 16% under the peak year of 1979.   The largest decline was
in basic organic chemicals, down 19% in 1982, and synthetic fibers,
down 25%.  The smallest decline was in plastics. (26)
     Use of chemical  plant capacity declined from 85% in 1972, to
78% in 1980, to 66% in 1982, and 63% in the  first quarter of 1983.
Some overcapacity in  basic chemicals plants  is expected to con-
tinue.  (27)

-------
                                -48-
     There  is a slow recovery in three major market areas for
 chemicals — agriculture, transportation, and construction — in
 1984, but the long-term trend may well keep chemical shipments
 under their late 1970's1 peaks for several years.  It is possible
 that production of basic chemicals may not achieve those growth
 rates again; foreign competitors have comparative advantages in
 terms of energy and materials costs, labor costs, and social/en-
 vironmental costs.  Production of specialty chemicals, however,
 will continue to grow strongly.  These are relatively high profit
 products, where the U.S. has the advantage in advanced chemical
 technologies and processes.
    . Finance.  As a result of the recession, chemical industry
 profits in 1982 fell to the lowest levels since 1973, although
 recovery appears to have begun.
     Capital expenditures for new plants and equipment by the top
 14 firms are projected to remain relatively low through the 1980's
 although there was an upturn in early 1984. (28)  With some idle
 capacity expected to continue into the late 1980's, relatively few
 new plants are anticipated.  High interest rates over the next few
years would further discourage industry expansion.
     Overseas investment by U.S. chemical firms has remained rela-
 tively constant since 1980.  It is expected to increase because of
 the relatively high cost of doing business in the U.S. compared to
 the developing world and increased foreign competition.
     Employment.  Chemical  companies cut their workforce in 1982
 by 6% because of the recession.   Almost three-quarters of the jobs
 lost were for production and non-supervisory workers. (29)  There
was a further decline of about 2% in 1983. (30)  While there will
 be some job growth in 1984, many of these jobs may not be refilled
 because they can be eliminated by further automation.  This will be
especially attractive for jobs where worker safety and health is a
problem.
      The most  severe  cuts  in  employment  in  1982 were  in  plastics
and fibers (down 6% from 1981  levels and  20% from 1972 levels)  and

-------
                                -49-
 in agricultural chemicals (down 506% from 1981, but still up 20%
 from 1972).  In these chemicals employment will continue to de-
 cline, because of increased overseas production and automation
 of existing and future pi ants„
     Employment of scientists and engineers within the chemical
 industry has steadily risen over the last ten years to a high in
 1982 of over 60,000.  A continued rise is expected. (31)
     R&D.  R&D spending is increasing for the chemical industry.
 It was $5,325 million in 1982 and is projected to increase to
 $8,655 million by 1986. (32)  But R&D as a percentage of absolute
 GNP'has declined,  especially in basic commodity R&D.  Both the
 maturity of the industry and the rising costs and risks of intro-
 ducing new products and processes may be leading industry to
 focus R&D on more short-term, incremental projects. (33)  Many
 chemical companies are emphasizing valued added drug research and
 moving away from R&D in traditional, volume commodity chemicals.
     Most R&D funds in 1982 and 1983 went to improving existing
 products, (52%). In 1983, only 28% of the funds were spent for
 new products and 21% for new chemical processes. (34)  In 1984,
 there is a projected increase of 10% in industry R&D, with most of
 it going to new products and to bioengineering. (35)
     Industry/academic R&D cooperation is likely to increase sig-
nificantly.  Many people in the chemical  industry want to shift
basic research  and the earlier stages of development to universi-
ties. (36)  But several  concerns may complicate this relationship:
     — conflicts of interest between scientists and product
        developers,
     — the likelihood of legal  battles over patent rights, and
     — potential  problems arising from product liability liti-
        gation.
     The chemical  industry is one of the  four most R&D intensive
industries, and about 93% of its R&D is supported directly by pri-
vate  sector chemical  firms.  (37)  Total  spending for R&D in indus-
trial  chemicals increased 47% from 1971-1981. (38)

-------
                               -50-
     According to an NBS observer, a number of factors will  en-
courage R&D spending: (39)
     -- the Economic Recovery Act of 1981;
     -- the need for innovations in process technology to
        increase efficiency of existing and of new operations;
     -- the hope of using alternative feedstocks;
     -- the need to optimize plant operations and management
        and gain flexibility in new plant design to meet market
        demands;
     — the desire to train scientists and engineers in industry-
        related fields;
     -- the possibilities of new processes and products via bio-
        technology;
     — the promise of discovering or of acquiring higher value
        added specialty products such as Pharmaceuticals; and
     -- the need to offset rising energy and raw material costs.
     Pilot Plants and Scale Up.  Small-unit testing is important
for large chemical plants, to prove the validity of basic
reactions; discover and address secondary reactions and potential
environmental and health hazards; boost yields to economic levels;
solve incremental problems; and test construction materials and
processes for larger units.          ;
     The growing complexity of process technology and higher
financial stakes are leading the industry to be increasingly con-
servative in scaling from smaller to larger units.  Fewer risks
are undertaken.  At the same time, computer modeling and optimiza-
tion paradigms can cheaply and quickly predict scale-up problems
and needs, obviating the need for pilot testing.
     There is a trend toward tieing together process steps at
early stages of plant scale-up,,  This is driving up the cost of
scale-ups, but it also allows early detection and correction of
the buildup of unwanted by-products.
     For basic commodities, e.g., petrochemicals, plant scale-up
will  be increasingly challenged given the likelihood of changing
feedstocks.   Heavier distillates and  residual  oils, higher tern-

-------
                                -51-
 peratures and pressures, and more active catalysts are compli-
 cating  the scale-up of chemical processes.  Pressures for scale-
 up  — competition and cost — are reducing the typical 2-3 year
 pilot phase  to a few months. (40)
 2.   Size and Location
        "World class" producers (defined as the  largest volume pro-
 ducers  of bulk chemicals) are increasing in scale; for example,
 Cosdan's styrene plant in the 1950's produced 20 million pounds
 per year as  top producer; in 1980, American Hoechst completed a
 900 million  pound per year plant in Texas.  In the future, however,
 such increases in scale will more often be located in foreign
 countries than in the U.S.  The only world class plants built in
 the U.S. during the next decade will likely be -located in Alaska
 at sites near available feedstocks and barge, ship, or pipeline
 transportation.
        "Energy supplies may have some indirect effects on the
     location of petrochemical  production....  A number of oil-
     producing countries have begun construction of massive petro-
     chemical facilities, attempting to move from simple producers
     of crude oil to exporters  of a wide variety of processed
     hydrocarbons.  Many of these investments are being made more
     on the basis of national prestige and development (and in an
     atmosphere of abundant capital) than on strict economic con-
     siderations.  Their existence may make it unprofitable for
     U.S. companies to build similar facilities at home." (41)
     The top ten chemical producing states, in 1980, in descending
order were:   Texas, New Jersey, Illinois, Ohio, California, Louisi-
ana, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Indiana. (42)  With
the move toward specialty chemicals in the U.S., the average plant
size will  decrease.  Sites with favorable transportation, water,
and fuel availability will  also be harder to find.  This may induce
some gradual  changes in the pattern of plant location, but they
will not be dramatic shifts.
     The long-term trend toward migration of the chemical  industry
to the Gulf States may be weakening. (43)  While the chemical  in-

-------
                                -52-
 dustry  as  a whole  grew 29% during 1970-1980, in Louisiana the
 industry only  increased 22.6%, and in Texas, the leading chemical
 producing  state, it only grew 10.7%,  The fastest growth is occur-
 ring  in California, 47.8% between 1977-1980, in spite of the fact
 that  California environmental regulations are considered the
 strictest  in the nation. (Here growth is measured on the basis of
 value of shipments minus the costs of materials and energy„  Dur-
 ing the same period, production went up by 6%.  Since 1980, world-
 wide economic  problems have pushed all measures of growth into a
 slump; cyclical recovery is beginning in 1983-84.  However, migra-
 tion trends remain the same.)  There are indications of renewed
 interest in sites in the Great Lakes States.
     Geographic proximity of industry plants to raw materials will
 continue to be important in the strategic planning in this industry.
     The hazards involved in chemical manufacturing and waste dis-
 posal are  leading to increasing public debate about acceptable sites,
 but these  have so far not been major factors in decisions about chem-
 ical facility siting.  A recent Conservation Foundation Study showed
 that environmental  constraints rarely block siting choices.   (44)
 Siting could, however, be significantly more controversial  in the
 future.  This would tend to lock in the present location pattern.
     The chemical  industry is constantly modernizing, upgrading,
 and maintaining its plants.   Much of this renewal  is on-site, but
 the industry will  continue to phase out some low profit, ineffi-
 cient plants.  During the run-down period, firms will likely defer
maintenance of the  plants,  leading to pollution increases;  and
after the plant is  permanently closed, the machinery exposed to
 toxic and hazardous substances and the waste disposal facilities
may remain  highly  dangerous  to public and environmental  health,
     Issues that must soon  be confronted by industry and govern-
ment are how the dismantling and disposal  of obsolete plants and
clean-up of the grounds  should be regulated.

-------
                               -53-
3.  Product Trends

     Petrochemicals.  The U.S. will maintain leadership in new or

special grades of petrochemicals because of its technological lead

in chemicals and chemical processes. (45)   But production of bulk
chemicals will tend to stabilize and possibly even decline in the
U.S.  A growing proportion of bulk chemicals will be produced in

off-shore locations and Third World countries.

     Other Organic Chemicals.  The long-term prospects for organic

chemicals will be influenced by:
     — the demands of end-product markets, namely, Pharmaceu-
        ticals, gasoline octane improvers, pesticides, synthetic
        detergents, oil field chemicals, and protective coatings
        requiring new and improved intermediate organic chemicals;

     — increasinq cost and decreasing availability of fossil fuels
        for use as energy and as feedstock;

     -- reduction ot excess productive capacity in industrial
        nations, with closing of low-profit, inefficient plants;

     -- increasing international competition and export promotion
        programs of foreign nations;

     -- the siting of large plants in gas- and oil-rich countries;
        the entrance of Saudi Arabia and Canada into the field by
        1986 and Indonesia, Mexico, Singapore, and other Middle
        East nations by 1990, significantly changing the inter-
        national structure of the organic chemicals industry;
     -- decline of the U.S. share of the large-volume, commodity
        organic chemical  market, with the U.S. remaining a major
        supplier of small-volume, specialty organic chemicals.
     Urea formaldehyde may drop in production due to potential

government regulation and public concern over health risks.   Long-

term prospects for using  methanol as a primary automotive engine

fuel  and as a feedstock for hydrocarbon production are leading to

increased R&D to improve  energy efficiency of methanol manufac-

turing processes.   Multifunction monomers  are making it possible

to formulate protective coatings, inks, and adhesive cheaply using

radiation rather than heat.   Biotechnology will  provide new

sources of organic chemicals based on use  of waste material - but

production is not expected in any volume until the late 1980's.

-------
                                -54-
     Agricultural Cheitricals.  Reduced domestic demand coupled with
 increasing foreign penetration of the U.S. market is forcing U.S.
 manufacturers to lower prices of nitrogenous fertilizers.  But
 rising natural gas costs will increase the prices of ammonia.
     Increases in the world demand for grain may result in slight
 increases in domestic consumption of phosphate fertilizers, but
 most demands will be met by existing stocks.  While the proximity
 of U.S. manufacturers to phosphate rock resources and to seaports
 will act to maintain current production levels, the low cost of
 foreign products will eventually erode the U.S. share of the world
 market.
     The rising costs of agricultural chemicals and new concern over
 groundwater contamination and non-point source water pollution may
 lead to a continued reduction in their production.  The only
 growth expected over the next five years is for herbicides associ-
 ated with no-till agricultures.   Competition will force smaller
 companies out of the market and lead to increased emphasis on selec-
 tive herbicides, growth regulators, and synthetic pyrethroids.
     Drugs.   The U.S. pharmaceutical industry is losing ground to
 foreign competition, according to a National Academy of Engi-
 neering (NAE) study released in July  1983.  (46)  U.S. share of world
 pharmaceutical R&D expenditures has fallen from more than 60% in
 the 1950's to less than 30% in 1982.  The number of U.S. owned new
drugs entering U.S.  clinical  trials has steadily dropped, from 60
 per year through the 1960's to 25 per year in 1982.  Foreign
 levels  have  remained constant at 20 per year.  (47)
     — Small U.S.  pharmaceutical firms originate fewer drugs than
        before 1960 and depend more on foreign firms for licensing
        new  products.
     — The  percentage of world pharmaceutical  production
        occurring in the U.S.  has fallen from 50% in 1962, to 38%
        in 1968,  to 27% in 1978.   U.S.  share of world pharmaceu-
        tical exports has fallen from more than 30% before 1960
        to less  than 15% in 1983.

-------
                               -55-
     Telematics.  Telematics — the technologies and systems of
computers, telecommunications, and information -- is affecting all
facets of society and industry, a worldwide revolution comparable
to the Industrial Revolution.  Significant direct impacts will
probably first come from monitoring, in computer-aided design and
manufacturing, computer modeling, and the broad area of informa-
tion management and availability.  Indirect impacts on chemicals
and the chemical industry will emerge as telematics alters social
systems such as work patterns,  industry organization and manage-
ment, transportation, and economic and political operations. (48)
     Three-dimensional visualization and design optimization capa-
bilities of computers are already being used in computer-aided
design and manufacturing.  Expanding CAD/CAM applications include:
     — 'rapid scale-up from bench to several million pounds per
        day operations;
     — flexible, individualized, rapid plant .design, saving labor
        costs and reducing waste.  While destandardization may
        make it difficult to generalize about or predict a poten-
        tial occupational hazard, computers can help pinpoint the
        source of a hazard and analyze possible design solutions;
     -- highly integrated plant design that ensures that sub- •
        systems will mesh and that retrofits will perform as
        desired.
     Computers and other modern instruments are assisting in auto-
mating the chemical plant testing and manufacturing process.   (49)
Computer controlled bench-scale testing units and six technicians
can now perform the testing and recording that 25-30 technicians
would do.   New mass spectrometers trace catalyst poisons that once
went undiscovered.   Carbon analyzers, refractometers, and chroma-
tographs provide instant and simultaneous data on product streams.
On-line electronic instruments are providing information in
minutes that, under the batch-mode, would take hours.  Advanced
mathematical models and computer simulations are providing new in-
sights into chemical processes, encouraging the development of
increasingly sophisticated chemical data banks within firms and
permitting testing of chemicals on increasingly smaller scales.

-------
                                -56-
      Development-of'microprocessors enables the placement  of  ad-
 vanced digital control  technologies at key unit operations
 throughout  chemical plants.  For example, in petrochemical  com-
 plexes,  computers control furnaces, fractionating towers,  cracked
 gas  compressors, and other downstream units.  Use of computers for
 process  control is greatly assisting efforts to improve energy
 efficiency and lower waste by-products.  Computer-aided design of
 plants is facilitating maximization of energy and feedstock use,
 assisting development of fully integrated manufacturing and waste
 disposal systems, and lowering overall pollution levels.
     The move toward more comprehensive instrumentation has driven
 up the cost of pilot plants, but the use of computer simulations
 has decreased the amount of time required for, and risks involved
 in, scale-ups of plants.
     Computers and robots will  replace human mental  activity in
ways similar to machinery's displacement of human physical
 functions.  This may lead to:
     — reductions in middle management,  with top management
        accessing information directly, thereby lowering overhead
        costs to industry;
     -- reductions in blue-collar jobs — one estimate foresees a
        labor decline in manufacturing from the current 22% of
        the labor force to a 3-5% by 2000; although  most chemical-
        industries,  being already highly automated,  will be less
        drastically  affected;  and
     — increased pressures upon government and industry to re-
        train displaced workers. (50)
     Centralized data testing and analysis and information  pro-
cessing is increasing.   The Chemical  Abstracts Service is accessed
via computers and telephones by chemical  companies and interested
parties worldwide.   The American Institute of Chemical  Engineers
and the Chemical  Industry Institute of Toxicology are joining
forces to address new technologies, while lowering individual  R&D
and testing costs.
     Expenditures for information services will  increase.  The top
four chemical companies are spending an average of 54 mil lion per

-------
                                -57-
 year for library materials,  on-line  bibliographic  and  numeric  reference
 services,  on-line  technical  processing,  computer system  support,
 telephone  and  telecommunications, and  records management.   (51)
 Additional  information  costs,  including  external and internal  re-
 search  reports,  marketing  information  services, competitor  analy-
 ses,  and publications are  often proprietary and not included in
 information budgeting.
      Large decentralized networks are  forming among institutions,
 regions, and individuals.  Through telematics, a regional office
 can  integrate  fully  into the day-to-day  operations of  a  company,
 increasing overall efficiency while decreasing autonomy.
      A  trend towards continuous and pervasive compilation of in-
 formation  is emerging from increasing  reliance on  telematics to
 sort, process, store, and  transmit data.  For instance,  every  time a
 person  or company  contacts an  institution he" generates information
 which can be incorporated  into a data  base.  A hospital  stay,  a job
 interview, a phone call to the doctor  or plumber or lover,  a plane
 trip, a  drugstore  purchase — all could  contribute information on
 the  individual and, combined with other  inputs, on the population.
 The capability for collecting microdata may affect marketing strate-
 gies, health records, risk exposures,  and many other interactions
 between  people and the man-made environment.  Company  data  can be
 compiled and analyzed in new ways.   But this capability will also
 give rise to important and complex issues involving rights  to pri-
 vacy, ownershi-p of information and misuse of data.
 C.  CHANGES IN CHEMICAL FEEDSTOCKS,  ENERGY USE,  AND WASTE MANAGE-
    MENT
 1.  Feedstocks  and Energy
     The feedstock mix of the chemical  industry  is  slowly shifting,
driven mainly  by  factors external  to  the industry  itself:
     --  the technology of feedstock  utilization,
     --  the costs and availability  of petroleum  and natural  gas,

-------
                                -58-
     -- the balance between chemical feedstock, fuel, and energy
        generation uses of petroleum and natural gas,
     — regulations affecting processes and waste management,
     -- economic costs associated with retrofit, construction, and
        operations.
     Energy costs are replacing capital costs as the main driver
of decisions on processes, pathways, and feedstocks, especially
for commodity chemicals.  (52)
     The raw material hydrocarbon feedstock bases for organic
chemicals will be undergoing changes over the next few decades.
     Feedstock use will change slowly, as there is substantial
investment in the process infrastructure of current feedstocks,
especially petrochemical intermediates with high vertical and hori-
zontal integration.
     The quality of basic petrochemicals as feedstocks will decrease
and become more mixed.  As costs rise, the first stage will be to
make more efficient use of petrochemical feedstocks rather than
shift feedstock.  While the use of petrochemical feedstocks will
decline slowly, coal  and lower grade crudes will replace petroleum
and gas and new hydrocarbon sources will be used to generate the
same petrochemical  feedstocks through coal  gasification to natural
gas substitute or liquefaction to a petroleum substitute or direct
from coal.  What shift does occur may be first to coal and coal
gasification and liquefaction products (with high capital costs)
and then increasingly to biomass.
     The chemical  industry uses:
     — 10% of the  18 thousand cubic feet of natural  gas produced
        each year,
     — 6% of the 15  million barrels of liquid hydrocarbons pro-
        duced each  day, and
     — 20% of all  industrial  power. (53)
     Economic incentives,  availability of raw materials, and energy
costs  are stimulating switches to new production processes.  For

-------
                                -59-
 example, pyrolysis routes to benzene are replacing traditional
 processes.  New processes can give different mixes of by-products,
 impurities, wastes; the pyrolysis route to benzene often contami-
 nates it with polynuclear aromatics.  Increasing demand for fuel
 oil may cause a search to alternative sources of petrochemicals
 and derived products, such as plastic from coal or plant crops.
 Some strategies being used are shown in Exhibit 4.
     As the use of lower grade ores and recycling increases, the
 demand for improved separation technology will increase. -Separa-
 tion aids such as flotation chemicals will be increasingly used,
 creating new discharges. (54)
     There is increasing modification in the industry to allow for
 a diversity of feedstock, both between petroleum and coal and
 among petroleum grades.
     Coal is likely to be a significant feedstock by the early
 1990's.  Eastman Kodak in 1983 built a 500 million pound/year acetic
 anhydride plant based on new process technology to utilize syngas
 from coal — the first commercial U.S. use of synfuels technology.  (55)
 Currently, while variable production costs are cheaper from coal,
 the high capital outlay has prevented many companies from invest-
 ing in new coal-based processes.
     Another possible feedstock is biomass.  Although production of
 ethanol from corn is becoming increasingly competitive at commodity
 levels, commercial  production of commodity organic chemicals from
 biomass via biotechnological  processes is not expected until the
mid- to late-1990's. (56)  In the long term, fermentation and other
biotechnology tools (e.g., enzymes, plant and animal cell cultures)
will be used in the production of organic chemicals. (57)  Problems
 in the scale-up of biochemical  engineering process include heat
 removal, mixing, sterilization, instrumentation and controls, cataly-
sis, and water supply, but experts expect that bioprocesses will
eventually be used for production of higher value added chemicals
and some commodity chemicals. (58)

-------
                               -60-
                           tXHIBIT 4
FEEDSTOCK SECURITY POSITIONS  OF SOME LEADING CHEMICAL FIRMS
    Chemical  Company

    Oupont



    Dow
    Union  Carbide

    Monsanto



    W.  R.  Grace
    Ameri-can  Cyanamid

    Celanese

    PPG  Industries
          Hydrocarbon Base

Merger with Conoco, expanded oil/gas
exploration effort through recent
acquisition (Terrapet)

Owns oil/gas properties; recently
sold domestic oil and gas reserves to
Apache; still owns Freeport,  Texas
crude oil processing refinery

Purchases feedstock supplies

Oil/gas exploration revenues indirectly
support feedstock needs; has coal
resources

Oil/gas exploration revenues indirectly
support some feedstock needs; plans
expanded energy exploration effort
through subsidiary (Union Texas
Petroleum)

Purchases feedstock supplies

Purchases feedstoc'k supplies

Purchases most feedstock supplies
                                      Source:  T. C. O'Brien, NBS
                                       and Industrial Biotechnology,
                                       Washington, D.C.: National
                                       Bureau of Standards, July 1982,
                                       p. 22.

-------
                                -61-
     Biotechnology, via chemoautotrophic microorganisms, can also
provide a range of organic compounds from hydrogen and carbon
dioxide, which are available from coal following reaction with
steam.  (59)
     The commodity organic chemical industry views its current
investments in biotechnology as a means to keep its options open.
(See Exhibit  5). The industry hopes that this technology will, be-
fore the end of the decade, produce higher value added organic
chemicals.  Application of biotechnology on an industrial scale
for the production of "traditional" commodity organic chemicals  is
not expected much before the end of the century.  Because of the
difficulties that will be encountered in displacing commodity
organic chemicals from petroleum feedstocks, the value added com-
ponent from biotechnology may be a comparatively small $1 billion.
However, biotechnology may have a significantly greater market
impact in the production of "non-traditional" commodity organic
chemicals such as biopolymers.   (60)   '  '.
     Depending upon the economics and politics of producing
organic chemicals via biotechnology, biomass could become an impor-
tant feedstock for the production of organic chemicals.  However,
considerable research effort must take place to improve the
productivity and economics of the biotechnological  processes for
biomass conversion that are under consideration.  Critical  to such
an improvement for bioprocesses will be advances, and innovations
in biotechnology "tools,"  such  as biocatalyst, recombinant DMA,
cell  culture, and fermentation  technologies.   Further, if biotech-
nology is to be applied on the  industrial scale envisioned by or-
ganic chemical producers,  innovation must also occur in bioprocess
engineering technology areas, such as process monitoring and con-
trol, product separation and recovery, aseptic operation, and
process intensification.  (61)

-------
                                  -62-
                               EXHIBIT S

                 BIOTECHNOLOGY ACTIVITIES OF LEADING
                       U.S.  CHEMICAL PRODUCERS
    1982
Ranfc. Sales   Company

      1      Dupont
               Classification

           Basic chemicals
      5

      6

      7

      8



      9


     10

     11


     12


     13

     14

     15
     16

     17

     18


     19
     zn
             Dow        Basic chemicals
             Chemical
             EXXON      Petroleum

             Monsanto   Basic chemicals
Union
Carbide
Shell
011
Celanese
Standard
011 of
Indtana

W. R.
Grace
Allied
Corporation

Phillips   Petroleum
Petroleum
Basic chemicals

Petroleu m

Basic chemicals
Petroleum
Specialty chemicals

 Basic chemicals
Atlantic
Richfield
Eastman
Kodak
Mobil 011
Hercules
Gulf 011
Rohn &
Haas
American
Cyanamld
Stauffer

American
Hoechst
Petroleum

Photo equipment

Petroleur.1
Basic chemicals
Petroleum
Basic chemicals

Basic chemicals

Basic chemicals

Basic chemicals
                        Biotechnology investments
                      In-houseEquity Ownership,
                        RiO
                                           Caltcch, Harvard, Univ.
                                           of Maryland, Hew England
                                           nuclear Corporation

                                           Collaborative Genetics,
                                           Collaborative Research .
                                            Ingene
                                            Cold Spring Harbor, MIT .

                                            Oiogcri, Genentech,
                                            Genex, Collagen, Harvard
                                            Rockefeller, Washington
                                           University
Cetus, Cell tech

Yale
Cetus
Agripartners
                                Biologicals, Calgene
                                Collagen,  Genetics  Institute
                                Salk Institute Bio-
                                technology  Industrial
                                Associates  (SIBIA)
Adria Laboratories
Advanced Genetic
Sciences
Molecular Genetics
Cytogcn
                                                        Massachusetts-General
 SOURCES: T.C. O'Brien, NBS and Industrial Biotechnology. Washington,
 B.C.: National Bureau of Standards, July 1982.
 Office of Technology Assessment,  Commercial Biotechnology. An Inter-
 national Analysis. Washington, O.c.: u.5. GPO, January lyei, pp. s>/-
 70. 100-101, 416-418.
 And other sources.

-------
                                -63-
      The  technology already exists for cost-effective biologi-
 cal  production of some commodity chemicals.  Commodity chemicals
 most likely  to be made from biomass in the future are ethanol,
 acetone,  isopropanol, acetic acid, citric acid, propanoic acid,
 fumaric acid, butanol, 2t3-butanediol, methyl  ethyl  ketone,  gly-
 cerin, tetrahydrofuran, and adipic acid, according to a recent
 report by the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment
 (OTA).  But  OTA also concluded that because the chemical composi-
 tion  of biomass is different from that of petroleum and because
 microorganisms have a wide range of activities, it is likely  that
 "the  most important commodity chemicals produced from biomass will
 be,  not chemicals that directly substitute for petrochemicals, but
 other chemicals that together define a new structure for the chemi-
 cal  industry." (62)  Genetic manipulation may produce microorganisms
 with  characteristics such as tolerance to increased levels of products
 during bioprocess reactions, tolerance to higher temperatures, and
 faster rates of production,,  Environmental applications of biotech-
 nology will  also be important, for example in toxic waste degrada-
 tion.  Regulation will be a major factor in the development and tim-
 ing of these applications since they will call for release of organ-
 isms  directly into the environment.
      In spite of current perceptions of an "oil glut", total oil
 production will  probably peak around the year 2000, and develop-
 ment  of new  natural  gas reserves, usually associated with oil dis-
 coveries, have been less than production for over a decade,,
      Continued.dependence on petroleum as the major feedstock will
 depend on the oil  production of Saudi  Arabia and its economic and
 political stability, and on other factors such as U.S. and cilobal
 economic growth; energy conservation;  oil production and stability
 of other OPEC nations; and energy contributions from nuclear, coal,
 solar, and other sources. (63)
     A chemical  industry transition will  take place in the future,
with  a shift from oil  and natural gas  to coal  and to biomass feed-

-------
                                -64-
 stocks.   Economics will  dictate  the  timing of  this  transition.
 Technological  innovation will  be an  essential  component  in  the
 shift.   The  transition  to alternative  feedstocks will  stimulate
 evolution and  structural  change  in the  chemical industry.
      Emphasis  on energy efficiency and increasing  use  of process
 heat will spur the  use  of by-products  and wastes for energy
 generation.
 2.   Waste Management Problems  and Opportunities
      The Scope of the Problem.   Although OTS does  not  directly
 address  the  regulation  or tracking of  hazardous wastes,  TSCA
 does  cover waste disposal  and  OTS deals with related problems
 of  incineration  and  recycling  of hazardous chemicals.  The  mis-
 sion  of  OTS  within EPA  will  be shaped  by the. regulatory  policy
 environment.   Management of  hazardous waste, expecially  toxic
 waste, is crystallizing  public concern  and policy  response  in
 many  areas peripheral to  waste issues.  In the 1980's, it is
 the  issue around  which  lines are drawn  between environmental-
 ists  and  industry, and which patterns  state and Federal  regula-
 tory  strategies.  It  is  also a key issue in industry planning
 and financing.   As discussed in  Chapter 4, media attention  and
 the dramatic personal nature of  environmental and health prob-
 lems  raised  by toxic wastes have  made them the focal point  of a
 broader range of  concerns about  chemicals, health,  the environ-
 ment, and balancing responsibility for maintaining  the safety
 and quality of health and the environment.
      The  technology and economics of industrial waste manaqeme-it
will  also help  determine the processes and products  that indus-
 tries manufacture and, consequently,  the demand for  action  under
 TSCA.   Thus OTS needs to keep up with advances in  industrial
waste management technology and practice as well  as  public  and
 political responses to the continuing problem of hazardous  waste
management.

-------
                               -65-
     Litigation and regulation regarding hazardous wastes will  be
a focus of political  — and industrial  — action at least through
the 1980's.  Technological, economic, and management strategies to
minimize risks are necessarily long-term.
     In late 1983, EPA revised its 1980 estimate of total hazardous
wastes in the U.S. upwards by 375%, to 150 million tons.  (64)  The
chemical industry generates a little over 70% of this.   An Associa-
of State and Territorial  Solid Waste Management Officials survey
estimated that about 255-275 million tons of known .and  tracked
hazardous wastes are added to the environment each year,  in addi-
tion to "millions of tons" of unregulated and exempted  hazardous
waste, (65)  This survey was done for the Congressional  Office  of
Technology.Assessment, which estimated that about 10% of all
hazardous wastes are produced by unregulated small producers. (66)
     Nine firms account for over 50% of all commercial  waste dis-
posal and treatment.  They have increased their permitted  landfill
capacity and increased their chemical treatment capacity,  but
since these increases were mostly in or near existing sites, there
is still a serious shortage of accessible sites in certain areas
of the country. (67)
     While the total volume of wastes is growing,  the volume of
waste treated by these nine firms declined from 3.7 million wet
metric tons in 1980-81 to 3.6 million wet metric tons this year. (68)
The effort to separate hazardous from non-hazardous waste  should
slow the growth in the volume of wastes treated off-site.  Some
large-volume waste streams have been removed from the EPA's hazard-
ous waste list, e.g., certain paint sludges and pickled liquor
sludges.
     Reflecting differences in political priorities, many states
have more stringent definitions of "hazardous" than does  the
Federal  government.  Under California law, for example,  15 million
tons of hazardous waste were produced in California in  1980,  while

-------
                                -66-
 EPA estimated waste generation at 2.6 million tons. (69)   Other
 states have similar definitions but use different measures,  thus
 arriving at a different number for total  volume of hazardous waste.
 Often State and EPA estimates  differ by an order of magnitude.
 There is no internationally accepted definition of hazardous
 waste.  (70)
      Many problems  of hazardous waste management result not  from
 the lack of sophisticated control technology but rather from hap-
 hazard awareness,  use, enforcement, and incentive for the avail-
 able technologies.   There are  severe gaps  in worker education,
 public understanding, and the  effectiveness of the economic  and
 regulatory framework under which industry  and waste uuinaymnent
 companies operate.   RCRA mandates coordinated tracking  of wastes
 from "cradle-to-grave,"  but it is far from certain that the
 manifest system really works.   'Ihe recent  book Hazardous  Waste  In
 America  notes that  the publicity given to  waste incidents and the
 demand for tightly  controlled,  minimum-hazard waste management  has
 led to a blind and  universal public distrust of all waste opera-
 tions- -- including  the well-managed,  latest-technology  ones.  (71)
 A  1980 survey showed a majority of people  would accept  new facili-
 ties  only if the sites were at  least 100 miles away from  their
 homes. ('72).
      Industry, especially  larger,  financially well-off companies,
has i:ioved towards treating and disposing of much of its waste
on-site.  Dow  and DuPont each dispose of about 95% of their waste
on-site.  Across all  industry, about 80% of hazardous  wastes  are
managed on-site-. (73)  The disappearance of available  waste dis-
posal sites has created a disproportionate burden on smaller  com-
panies without the land and waste volume to provide for on-site
waste disposal.
     The costs of off-site chemical waste treatment are up 20%
from 1981-1982 and are expected to continue rising. (74')  The
reasons include:
     -- closure of some operations, e.g., landfills, due to
        public opposition or regulatory compliance problems;

-------
                              -67-
     — capital expenditures required to comply with state
        and Federal regulations;

     — new EPA requirements for owners of sites to have
        extensive liability insurance.

     While the Superfund law allocated $1.6 billion for cleanup of

uncontrolled hazardous waste sites and for compensation, OTA esti-
mated that cleanup of the 15,000 uncontrolled sites of previous
disposals so far identified would cost $10 to $40 billion.  (75)
See Exhibit 6.


                          EXHIBIT 6
     Quoted Prices for Major Hazardous Waste Firms in 1981
Type of
waf tc management
Landfill









Land treatment
Incineration clean



Chemical treatnv.it


Resource recovery
Deep well injection
Transportation
Type or form
of wat let
Drummed

Bulk
Type:
Acids/ alkalis
Odorous waste
Low risk hazardous waste
(e.g., oil and gas drilling muds)
Hazardous
Extremely hazardous
All
Relatively clean liquids, high-
Btu value
Liquids
Solids, highly toxic liquids
Acids/ alkalines
Cyanides, heavy metals, highly
toxic waste
All
Oily wauewater
Toxic rinse water

Price 1981
SO.o-4.SO.9l /gal
(SJS-S50/S5 gal drum)
SO.19-SO.28/gal







S0.02-$0.09/gal
$(0.05)*-S0.20/gal

50.20-SO.90/gj)
SI.50-SJ.00/gal
S0.08-SO.J5 /gal
S0.25-SJ.OO/gal

S0.25-$1.00/gal
S0.06-SO.I5/gal
SO.JO-SI.OO/gal
S0.15/tonmile
S/ tonne
1981
$168-5240

S5J-S8J '

$13-5210
SJO
S1J-S29

S30-S80
S50-SMO
$5-24
$(IJ)'-$5J

$5J-$2J7
SJ95-S791
$21 .$92
$66-$791

$66-$264
$16-$40
$[J2-$264

      *  Some  cement  kilns  and  light  aggregate  manufacturers
        are now  paying  for waste.
      Source:  Samuel  Epstein,  Lester Brown,  and  Carl  Pope,
      Hazardous  Waste in America.  San  Francisco:  Sierra  Club
      Books,  1982, p. 549.

     OTA also estimates that the $5 billion spent on satisfying

U.S. regulation on hazardous waste disposal  in 1983 will grow to

$12 billion by 1990.  (76)

-------
                              -68-
     At least 20 industrial waste exchanges, i.e., information
clearinghouses that provide information on specific wastes to
companies interested in using the wastes as raw materials, are
now in operation.  (77)
     The variation in  state regulation of waste disposal causes
extensive legal and illegal interstate traffic in hazardous wastes
(see Chapter 4).  Regional differences encourage companies to seek
the cheapest solution or to avoid regulation altogether by midnight
dumping.  Companies in Pennsylvania have to ship wastes out of
state at high cost because of the scarcity of local landfills.  (78)
     Midnight dumping is a serious problem.  EPA estimated in 1979
(before most of the RCRA regulations) that 90% of hazardous wastes
were mismanaged either through ignorance or deliberate avoidance
of regulation. (79)   The primary cause of unsound disposal was
identified as insecure surface impoundment.  Other independent
estimates have supported this. (80)   Transport of hazardous wastes
will be a growing concern, as discussed in Chapter 4.
     As the use of non-petroleum feedstocks increases, the amount
of waste generated will rise sharply.  Secondary feedstocks such
as heavier petroleum grades, coal, and syngas all generate more
waste during their creation as well as creating more wastes during
their utilization by the chemicals industry.  The chemical process
industry has been geared to maximize use of petroleum.
     The shift to biological-based feedstock would require aqueous
reaction conditions,  generating large amounts of liquid wastes.'
But these wastes are  generally much less toxic than those of
petroleum-based chemical  manufacture.  Coal, however,  often con-
tains significant amounts of heavy metals and radioactive com-
pounds.
     Decisions will  have to be made in the present with the cer-
tain knowledge that future science and technology will reveal new
concerns about the toxicity of wastes and the ineffectiveness of
various  management options.   For example, in the 1950's dioxin was

-------
                               -69-
 known  to  be  a  toxic  compound but was also believed to degrade
 rapidly in the soil;  25 years  later, bitter experience revealed
 the  shortcomings  of  older  technology.  The last word on dioxin's
 effect on humans  is  not yet in. (81)
     Technological Options.'  There  is no single best technology  to
 deal with all  toxic wastes.  Incineration and other high-tempera-
 ture processes and. recovery and recycling are the main "permanent"
 means  of  managing wastes (see  Exhibit 7).  Incineration and other
 high-temperature  processes such as  molten salt, plasma arc, super
 critical  water (374+°C, 218+atm), and pyrolysis, despite their
 high costs,  are becoming more  popular.  While these technologies
 break  down most organics,  even polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's),
 they need effective  scrubbers  and they create ash and scrubber resi-
 due which, in  turn,  requires disposal.  A manufacturer may be relieved
 of responsibility for a hazardous chemical by changing it into a dif-
 ferent .chemical substance  by incineration.
     The  EPA Office of Research and Development, Oil  and Hazardous
Materials  Spills Branch, has developed a mobile incinerator which,
operating  at 1200°C, will  destroy PCB's.  Highly halogenated organics
 such as PCB's  are the most resistant of toxic substances to degra-
 dation. (82)
     Other more advanced thermal  technologies  still  in the develop-
ment stage include plasma  destruction, where gases are heated to
several thousand degrees in an  electric field.
     In October 1983, EPA  estimated that 325 incinerators  were
operating  at  between 240 and  275  facilities.   About  half of these
were operated by the chemical  industry.  (83)
     Although process improvement,  recycling,  separation of wastes,
recovery,  etc.  can significantly  reduce the volume and toxicity of
wastes, there are irreducible limits to this.   Before 1981, only
about 2% of waste products  were recycled or reclaimed (84)  but this
is now increasing.  Recovery  of usable materials from wastes is ex-
pensive and the materials  are often contaminated,  in  the end run re-

-------
                               -70-
                           EXHIBIT 7

                       WASTE MANAGEMENT:

                    SOUNDNESS3 and METHODS5
   Sound Management
   (10% of wastes)

 incineration     (6%)

 Secure landfill  (23!)

 Recovered        (2%}
          Unsound Management
            (90% of wastes)

Unlined surface impoundments  (48%)

Land disposal                 (30%)

Uncontrolled incineration.     (10%)

Other                          (2%)
MANAGEMENT
METHOD
LANDFILL
Drum
Bulk
LAND TREATMENT
INCINERATION
Clean, high-
BTU liquids
Other organic
liquids
Solids, highly
toxic liquids
CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Acids, alkalis
Cyanides, heavy
COST
($/MT)

$110-240
$ 33- 83
$ 5- 24

$(-13)-53

$ 53-237

$395-791


$ 13- 92
$ 66-791
RECEIVED
(1000 MT)
1990


331
94






661


% CHANGE
1981-1983
+1%


+ 17%
+18%






-10%


% CAPACITY
UTILIZED
5%


22%
79%






44%


   metals, highly
   toxic wastes

RESOURCE RECOVERY   $ 66-264

DEEP-WELL INJECTION
  Oily wastewater   $ 13- 32
  Toxic rinses      $132-264
   60

  385
+603

-19%
32%
39%
aSource: B. Feder, "The E.P.A. gets Tough on Waste," New York Times,
 Dec. 22, 1980.
 Sources: Samuel Epstein, Lester Brown, and Carl Pope, Hazardous Waste
 in America. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1982, pp. 9, 549; Office
 of Technology Assessment, Technologies and Management Strategies for
 Hazardous Waste Control, Washington, O.C.: U.S. GPO. March 1983,
 ppV T5V 129"," 130.

-------
                               -71-
 sulting  in  problems  both  in  reuse  and  eventual disposal.   Increased
 recycling of products  containing chemicals -- such as  rubber,  ceram-
 ics,  oils and greases,  metals,  solvents, and waste acids  -- will
 probably cause  impurities  to  build up, concentrating any  toxic con-
 taminants if the  recycling process is  not carefully monitored.   Ad-
 ditionally,  new cross-contamination problems could arise  from  mix-
 ing during  recycling.  (85)
      Recycling  of materials  --  whether using potential wastes  for
 feedstock or energy  or  recycling products within a single plant --
 is  inherently attractive  and  is expanding, but is limited by the
 capital  investment in  fixed  process technology of most industries
 and by the  large  volume of waste.  Monsanto, instead of landfill ing
 hazardous dibasic acid, a  by-product of pesticide manufacture,  has
 made  the dibasic  acid  available to utilities for use in sulfur
 scrubbers.  (8'6)   Estimates of maximum  contribution of  recovery and
 recycling together range  around 20%.(87)
      Microbial  engineering is perhaps  the most promising  tech-
 nology for  the  long-term  future, expanding the use of  sewage
 treatment strategies to include purposefully engineered mixtures
 of micro-organisms to  break  down toxic substances in wastes.   Other
 biochemical   techniques are also expected to increase.   Some experts
 estimate that the application of enzyme technology in  waste treat-
 ment may reach $200 million by  1987,  a ten-fold increase over the
 1982 market.  (88)
     New biological  wastewater  treatment systems  conform  to EPA's
 definition of best practical  technology currentl-y available
 (BPT).  They provide  effective control  for most toxic pollutants,
 removing 95% of volatile toxic organic pollutants, 87% of base/
 neutral  pollutants,  and 77% of acids.   This  method of  waste treat-
ment will increase in use  in  coming years.  (89)
      while  recovery  and recycling will increase their  portion  of
 hazardous waste management,  significant economic and technical
 barriers remain to both biological and physical technologies.

-------
                               -72-
 While containment  and  monitoring  technologies  are  available  for
 relatively  safe  landfill/treatment  facilities,  the problems  for
 the coming  years are in  ensuring  the  use  of  the BPT, allocation
 of  the costs  of  safe waste disposal and bringing the many
 existing  disposal  sites  up to acceptable  safety levels.
      Management Patterns.  In a 1982  survey  of  the chemical  indus-
 try,  the  Chemical  Manufacturers Association  (CMA)  asked the  com-
 panies  how  their waste disposal methods had  changed  over recent
years.  (90)    The results, shown in  Exhibit 8, represent about 112
chemical  companies with a little over half of total  chemical indus-
try sales and employment.  While the  survey did not  investigate the
volume of wastes treated by various methods, it did  reveal  the
sharply increased attention to recycling.   Also noteworthy were the
decrease  in storage and increase in incineration, especially on-
site  incineration.
                             EXHIBIT 8
            CHANGES IN-INDUSTRY WASTE  DISPOSAL PROCEDURES
Waste Disposal Procedures
      Frequency of Response
                                 Recent Use of
                               Disposal Methods

                              More   Same   Less
Recycled
Stored on-site
Stored off-site
Incinerated on-site
Incinerated off-site
Landfilled on-site
Landfilled off-site
74%
16%
' 4%
36%
43%
 3%
39%
21%
24%
 8%
11%
15%
13%
24%
42%
30%
 5%
12%
30%
30%
  Method Not
Used Recently
      5%
     18%
     58%
     48%
     30%
     54%
      7%
Source: Peat. Warwick, Mitchell  & Co.. An IndVstry"Survey of Chemical
Company Activities to Reduce Unreasonable Risk, Final  Report,
February 11,  1983, p. 58.
     Twenty-one companies  cited examples of other recent methods
of waste disposal.  The most common cited example was  deepwell
injection.   Eight companies reported using deepwell  injection:
three more,  three the same, and two less.  Five companies reported
they are using more process changes to reduce wastes.

-------
                               -73-
      Other disposal  methods  which were  cited  as  being  used  more
 are:
                                   chemical  fixation;
                                   sell  for  recovery or  use;
                                   detoxification;  and
                                   pyrolysis.
          chemical  destruction;
          biological  treatment;
          biodegradation;
          neutralization;
      Invisible Wastes.  The management of toxic and hazardous
wastes  is already  recognized as a key issue in chemicals produc-
tion.   Of less prominence but equal significance are compounds
which are dispersed  unnoticed throughout the environment rather
than  confined to specific sites.  They are released through normal
wear  and tear of use, corrosion, accidents, and uncontrolled small-
scale disposal (by industry and consumer), as well as waste site
leakage.  There is no accurate way of tracking these environmental
pollutants.   The net toxicity of the chemical load they place on
the environment is unknown.
     Much of the problem is  invisible, with unregulated production
of toxic and hazardous wastes by individuals, homes, municipali-
ties, as well as illegal use of wastes as supplemental  fuels.
Another unknown is small-scale waste generators (producing less
than one ton a month of anything),  and they are currently exemp-
ted from regulation.  Incineration  can sometimes be classified as
small waste generators by adding a  heat exchanger.  Additionally,
wastes burned for fuel are often exempted, and may add to the un-
controlled dispersal of toxic substances,
D0  RISK MANAGEMENT
1.   Industry and Risk Reduction.   The 1982  CMA survey  of the  chem-
ical industry, already cited, found that 88% of the companies
responding had established chemical  hazard assessment programs*
These programs responded primarily  to  new products and  processes
(85% and 76%, respectively,  of new  products  and processes were
assessed).  However, a majority (57%)  of new formulations of
* This section should be read in the context of Chapter 4,
  Section B, dealing with political, legal, and social issues
  such as liability and compensation.

-------
                              -74-
existing products were also examined for hazard. (91)  Routine
hazard assessment of existing products occurred at a lower level,
mostly in response to external demands or triggers.  Exhibit 9,
below, shows the response rate of chemical  hazard assessment pro-
grams to these triggers.
                           EXHIBIT 9
            INDUSTRY CHEMICAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT PROGRAMS

Hazard  Assessment  Trigger                R§_sj)onse_fj:eciuency*
      Routine                                     41%
      Process  Change                              73%
      New Data                                    94%
      New Product Use                             63%
      Employee  Concern                            81%
      Consumer  Concern                            78%
      New Regulatory
        Requi rements                              92%
*NOTE:   The responses  to this  survey  necessarily are a  self-
         evaluation by  the  responding  chemical  companies.
Source:  Peat,  Marwick,  Mitchell  &  Co.,  An  Industry Survey  of  Chemical
Company  Activities to  Reduce  Unreasonable  Risk,  Final Report,
February 11,  1983, p.  18.	•  •  •	
      Other events  identified  as triggering chemical hazard   -  -
assessments on existing products were:
   — labeling and bulletin changes
   -- product  literature revisions
   -- environmental incidents and  concerns
   -- Material Safety Data Sheets  (MSDS) cyclical  review
   — sales volume changes
   -- raw material changes
   -- employee protection
   -- insurance company requests
   -- consultant recommendations
   -- unspecified audits.

-------
                                -75-
       Finally,  the survey of 112  companies  (92)  (representing   about
half the chemical  industry in terms  of sales  and  employees),  asked
the companies to assess  the status and changes  in their  toxicity testing
programs.   The survey defined toxicity testing  to include  animal,  en-
vironmental,  epidemiological, clinical,  and  toxicological  testing.   A
synopsis of the  results  is shown  in  Exhibit  10.
       The  same  CMA survey found that  78% of  responding  chemical
  companies had  toxicity  tests performed to evaluate the health  or
  environmental  effects of chemicals.  The companies' assessment of
  their toxicity testing  programs  is shown in Exhibit 11.
       A recent  publication of the Centers for  Disease Control
  summarized  what  is  known about cancer attributed to occupational
  exposure  to toxic substances, as shown in Exhibit 12.
       A 1977 study by the National  Institute for Occupational
  Safety and  Health (NIOSH) had placed the chemical industry
  twelfth on  the list of  industries  by hazards/exposure  of workers
  to  carcinogens.  (93)  It differed  from still  earlier studies that
  had ranked  the chemical  industry at  the top of  the list by  fac-
  toring in the  amount of worker exposure as well as the volume  of
  carcinogens.   The most  hazardous industries were:
       Industrial  and scientific  instruments
         (solder,  asbestos,  thallium)
       Fabricated  metal products
         (nickel,  lead, solvents,  chromic acids,  asbestos)
       Electrical  equipment and supplies
         (lead,.mercury,  solvents,  chlorohydrocarbons, solders)
       Machinery,  except  electrical
         (cutting  oils, quench oils, lube oils)
       Transportation equipment
         (polymers  and plastics constituents  such as formaldehyde,
         phenol,  isocyanates,  amines)
       Petroleum and petroleum products
         (benzene,  naphthalene, polycyclic aromatics)
       Leather products
         (chrome salts, other organics  used  in  tanning)
       Pipeline  transportation
         (petroleum derivatives, metals  used  in welding)

-------
                                                   -76-
                                                 EXHIBIT   10

                     INDUSTRY  REPORTED  CHANGES  IN  TESTING  PROGRAMS:
                                               A CMA SURVEY
      Most of the companies  reporting  organiza-
 tional changes  designated groups  or  individuals
 with environmental,  health, and  safety  responsi-
 bilities.  One  company reported  that  it had set
 up its environmental,  health,  and safety group
 as an operating expense center with  an  annual
 budget.  Another company established  a  toxi-
 cology department and  another  reported  that
 it had moved toxicological  responsibilities to
 to a more senior organization.    The  organiza-
 tional changes  reflect the  increasing responsi-
 bilities and importance of  environmental, health
 and safety functions.

      New toxicity testing facilities  or equip-
 i"ent were reported by  seven companies.  One of
 the companies  indicated that it had constructed
 a  multi-million dollar toxicity  testing labora-
 tory.   Another  company spent nearly one and a
 half million dollars on an  addition to  its lab
 for inhalation  toxicological testing.

      Increased  staffing for toxicological tes-
 ting was reported by 11  respondents.  One com-
 pany  reported that it  expanded its health staff
 from 5 to 60 professionals.  Another  company re-
 ported that  its full-time staff devoted to
 assessing toxicological  hazards increased from
 4  to  25.   A  third company staffed a new lab with
 39 umployees.
      New testing  policies were instituted by  11
 companies.   The new policies covered  new, exis-
 ting  and acquisition product testing; raw mater-
 ial  testing; labeling;  and  government regulatory
 compliance.

      Four companies reported that they  test all
 new products.   One of  these  companies reported
 that  toxicity testing  is  "now part of new product
 development  and is carried  out at an early  stage.1
 Another  company indicated that commercialization
 development  costs  include testing costs.
     Three companies reportedvthat they  have  pro-
 cedures  in place  for testing existing products:
 two reported that  they prioritize mature chemi-
 cals  for  testing  and one reported that  it con-
 ducts  annual reviews to  Identify chemicals  for
 testing  and proposes  annual  chemical  testing  pro-
 grams  to  each division.

     Another company reported that it establishes
 the toxicity of all raw materials and examines
 products  from acquisitions.   Another company
 added  intermediate and bulk  chemical  testing  capa-
 bilities  to test  for safe environmental  handling
 of these  chemicals.

     Man/ companies cited examples
 '.estino uractices.

     « Good laboratory  practices  (tiLfs). Com-
       oanies reported  that  they  now adhere  to
       CilPs.   Those previously  following GLPs
       •,aiu that  tneir GlPs  are now "formalized,"
       "better  defined," or  "strengthened."

     t Protocols.  Protocols are  now "updated,"
      . "more complex,"  "formalized,"  more comp-
       rehensive," and  "better  defined." Sev-
       eral companies designed  internal  testing
       protocols jnd  on« company  "qalnod facility
       in protocol selection."

     t Qua 1ity  control  in testing.  Examples  of
       greater quality  controlTn testing  include
       auditing  of testing,  validation procedures
       for studies, review procedures  for reports,
       quality assurance programs, and careful  re-
       view of subcontracted work.

     Many respondents  also cited  examples in  In-
creased numbers  of tests as  a major change  in
 testing programs,  examples  of  tests  which are
conducted more often  ,irpr
t behavioral  toxicology;

• chemical  fate:
i chronic;
• chronic Inhalation;
« corrosion;
« metabolic;
* metals analysis;
» molecular toxicology;

* oncogenlc;
« pharmacoklnetic;
• environmental  toxicity:     • reproductive;
* fertility;                  « sub-chronic;

• flash point;                • teratology;  and

t genetic:                   • wildlife.
* in vitro .nutagenici ty;

     One respondent indicated that it tests  more
species, more animals  per  species, and more  samples
of internal organs. Another respondent said  that
its testing has  "greatly  expanded from previous
years" to the point where  it now is spending  over
J1.5 million on  contracted and cooperative  toxicity
testing.  Another company  identified Increasing  re-
gulatory requirements  and  concern for product lia-
bility as major  reasons for conducting considerably
more tests.

     Closely related to the increase in numbers  of
tests is the conduct of more sophisticated  tests.
Testing state of the art  has advanced markedly;
many current tests such as the Ames and cell  trans-
formation tests  were not  known in 1969.  Companies
reported that their current testing programs:
     * emphasize bio-medical aspects of testing;

     t use a tier-test approach to assess the tox-
       icological hazards  of chemicals;
     • emphasize chronic,  sub-chronic, and  repro-
       ductive testing as  opposed to the earlier.
       emphasis  on simple  acute testing;
     • use greater scientific depth;
     • emphasize long-term testing;

     * apply a greater breadth of tests;

     « use more  extensive  histopathology;
     * use more  analytical chemisvy; and
     • apply more sophisticated analytical
       characterization.

     Improved recordkeepinq and information collec-
tion was cited by a number of respondents as an  ex-
ample of testing program improvements.  Most of  the
companies dted  use of computers as  their improve-
ment in reeordkeeping.  Respondents use computers
for data collection, storage and search.

     The kinds of data computerized are:

     • test documentation;
     • medical health  and environmental data;

     • toxidty  reports;

     t industrial hygiene data: and
     • material  safety data.
     Companies also dtnd examples of
 improvements which did not  involve (.unii.'uU-r1..
 These companies:
     • established archives  for all data;

     * expanded MSDS coverage;

     * use MSDS for all products; and
     • established recordkeepinq and reporting sys-
       tems.


     Source:  Peat.  Marwick,  Mitchell, * Co.,
     An  industry  Survey of  Chemical Company
     Activities to Reduce Unreasonable Risk,
     Final  Report, February 11.  1983, pp.  23-26.

-------
                          -77-
                      EXHIBIT 11

               CHEMICAL INDUSTRY SURVEY
            1981 TOXICITY TESTING PROGRAMS
               MEAN AND TOTAL RESPONSES a—-
                                Mean Response    Total Response

 Equivalent full-time staff             14          1,178

 Number of new substances/
   products tested                      22          1,856

 Number of existing substances/
   products tested                      29.          2,418

      Total number tested b              53          4,421

 Annual in-house expense        $1,184,000    $97,103,000

 Annual contracted expense         380,000     31,170,000

 Annual cooperative expense        123,000     10,309.000

        Total  expenseb          $1,724,000   $137,953,000

 Replacement value of
   toxicity testing
   facilities  in 1981           $3,148,000   $255,028,000
 aThe 122 companies represented in this survey are a cross-
  section of the U.S.  chemical  industry.   Together they
  represent over one-half the chemical  industry by measures
  of sales and employment.   The average 1981  sales of these
  companies was $773 million.   Responses  were adjusted to
  the percent attributable to U.S.  chemical  business.

^ Totals do not sum exactly due to a  limited  number of
  partially completed  questionnaires.

Source: Peat, Warwick, Mitchell, & Co., An Industry Survey of
Chemical Company Activities to Reduce Unreasonable Risk, Final
Report, February 11, 1983, p. 22.

-------
                                                 -78-
                                           EXHIBIT  12

                             SELECTED  OCCUPATIONAL CANCERS
    Alihougn general agreement exists concerning the overall incidence of cancer, considera-
 ble controversy  surrounds the proportion  of  cancer cases  attributable  to occupational
 exposures. Several characteristics of cancer contribute to the difficulty  in  making  such
 estimates:
    1.  Latency in  the development of cancer. Occupational cancer  usually becomes evident
       long  after initial exposure to the carcinogen; this interval may vary  from 5 years to
       more than  40 years ,    making it difficult to characterize important exposures long
       past.
    2.  Influence of exposures to multiple carcinogens. Cancer victims may have been occupa-
       tionally exposed to many carcinogens; interaction of these agents or interactions be-
       tween them and other factors may greatly increase the risk of cancer*
ICD-9f   Condition
                            Industry/occupation
                                      Agent
155     Hemangiosarcoma
          of the liver
160.0    Malignant neoplasm
          of nasal cavities
161      Malignant neoplasm
          of larynx
158.     Mesothelioma
163       (peritoneum)
          (pleura)
1 70      Malignant neoplasm
          of bone
187.7    Malignant neoplasm
          of scrotum
188      Malignant neoplasm
         of bladder
Vinyl chloride polymerization
Industry > intners
Woodworkers, cabinet/furniture makers
Boot and shoe producers
Radium chemists, processors, dial
 painters
Nickel smelting and refining
Asbestos industries and utilizers

Asbestos industries and utilizers
Radium chemists, processors, dial
 painters
Automatic lathe operators, metalworkers

Coke oven workers, petroleum refiners,
 tar distillers
Rubber and dye workers
Vinyl chloride monomer
Arsenical pesticides
Hardwood dusts
Unknown
Radium

Nktel
Ast sstos

Asbestos
Radium

Mineral/cutting
 oils
Soots and tars, tar
 distillates
Benzidine. alpha and
beta naphthylamine.
auramine, magenta,
4-aminobiphenyl.
4-nitrophenyl
1 89 Malignant neoplasm Coke oven workers Coke oven emissions
of kidney: other,
and unspecified
urinary organs
204 Lymphoid leukemia. Rubber industry Unknown
acute Radiologists Ionizing radiation
205 Myeloid leukemia, Occupations with exposure to benzene Benzene
acute Radiologists lonizirg radiation
207.0 Erythroleukemia Occupations with exposure to benzene Benzene
'w.ud.litiJ liiiuiiijtiuiial Classification of Diseases (ICO) rubiic.
Source: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly "eport 33 (9), "Leading
Diseases and Injuries - United States,'1 March 9, 1984, n. I2fi.
Work-Related

-------
                                -79-
     While the study had many limitations — no new data was
collected, only proven carcinogens were considered -- the data
used were the best available and indicated that the sum occupa-
tional hazard of the chemical industry is comparable to many others.
 2.   Genetic Screening.  The chemical industry views itself as being
caught between demands to protect workers and not  to discrimi-
nate.  (94)   The discovery of better and more accurate markers for
genetically-linked susceptibilities foreshadows the speedy expansion
of  industrial screening of present and potential employees to reduce
their  risk and company liability.  (See Chapter 4, Section D, for a
complementary discussion of  this issue.)
     At least a dozen major corporations, including Dow Chemical,
General Motors, Monsanto, and Firestone Tire and Rubber, have ex-
cluded fertile women of childbearing age from certain jobs in order
to protect the potential  fetuses from harm.   Known "in industry par-
lance as protective exclusion, this policy has drawn criticism and
lawsuits on the basis of unfair/unlawful  discrimination. (95)
     In October 1978, four women who had undergone voluntary steri-
lization in order to keep their jobs at an American Cyanamid's lead
pigment plant sued the company.   The women charged that their civil
rights had been violated; American; Cyanamid claimed that it would
be liable for damages if the women in question gave birth to de-
fective children, and that its interest was  to protect the poten-
tial fetuses.  Although American Cyanamid was in this instance
found liable, the technology of genetic screening is advancing so
rapidly that legal  and policy disputes will  balloon through the
1980's.  (96)
     Genetic screening is advocated as a  way of protecting both  the
industry and the  worker against  undue risk.   However,  the informa-
tion it makes available will  increase the dilemma  of determining
adequate levels of  protection for populations at different risk,
protecting the  rights of  workers, and assigning responsibility for
avoiding and mitigating environmental  and occupational  risks.

-------
                                                                                  ~l
                                -80-
 3.   Security Issues: Sabotage and Terrorism.  A worldwide
increase in terrorism, sabotage, and related criminal activity is
already drawing response from the chemical industry (see Exhibit
 13 below).  (97)   Chemi.cal- manufacturing plants, as with energy  . '
generation plants or key transportation links, are attractive
targets for terrorism or ransom demands; they may represent for-
eign control and intervention, or a hallmark of centralized in-
dustrial power, or the source of unfair labor practices or envi-
ronmental contamination.  Because of the potential  for theft of
toxic materials or of explosions releasing toxic materials, the
reliability and coordination of industrial and governmental manage-
ment of  security will become relatively more important in  the
 coming years.
                            EXHIBIT 13
Where the security

(million dollars)
Protective services
Guard & investigative
Central station
Armored car
Tntnl

Deterrent equipment
Fixed security
Locking
' Electronic access control
Lighting
Total

Monitoring & detection equipment
Electronic alarm
Monitoring & surveillance
CCTV
Total

Fire control equipment
Automatic sprinkler
Chemical fire extinguisher
Tntnl



•By the private uctor. Source: Predicastv
money goes
i Purchased security* i
1967 1980 1995

S535
115
103
• 753

92
191
1
JS
371
J/ t

57
74
_lfl
149
* 1 *T^

19
95


1,387

S2.945
700
390
4,035

415
750
225
300
1,690


505
680
140
1 325
1 f»J4bW

75
325
400
**w
$7,450

$12,200
2.800
J.260
16,260

1.680
2.385
1.245
14ZI
6,785


2,370
3,690
775
6 835
WrU wv

335
1.245
1 Ron
I ,wOV
$31 ,460

                                      Source:  Chemical week, February
                                               16, 1983, p. 38.

-------
                               -81-
 4.   Insurance.   Accompanying  rising  liability costs  is a  long-term
 trend towards  higher  insurance  coverage and higher rates.  Chemical
 companies  in  1981 paid  liability  insurance premiums of about 0.2%
 of total revenues.  This  could  increase by 200% in a  very  short
 time.  (98)   Liability  arising  from pollution is covered under two
 kinds  of insurance policies:   comprehensive general liability (CGL)
 and environmental  impairment liability (EIL).  Most CGL policies
 written in or  since the 1970's  include coverage of "sudden and
 accidental" pollution,  such as  spills, but do not cover "non-
 sudden and gradual" pollution,  such as continuing dispersal, or
 cleaning up waste dumps„  These are the main purpose  of the newer
 EIL policies.  CGL policies have  been tested and their interpreta-
 tion clarified by years of litigation and revision, but EIL
 policies are still "in an embryonic stage." (99)
     EIL policies are generally written on a claims-made contract
 basis, meaning that they cover only claims filed while the contract
 is  in effect, and not claims made later but related to pollution
 occurring  during or before the policy period.  They generally cover
 only gradual pollution, not sudden and accidental  pollution.  But
 some insurers and corporation risk managers are now arguing that
 both kinds of liabilities should  be included to prevent insurers
 from arguing over which is responsible for a given claim.   A few
 insurers,  therefore, cover both sudden and non-sudden risks on EIL
 policies,  and nearly all allow for a buy-back of such coverage from
 other insurers.  'Jell-known EIL insurers set primary  limits rang-
 ing  from $5 million to $30 million for one occurrence, and from
 $6 million to $60 million for aggregate claims.
     Nearly all EIL insurers cover claims for both bodily  injury
 and property damage resulting from environmental  impairment or
 pollution  hazard, and some also cover liability for "impairment
 or diminution of any environmental right or amenity covered by
 law."  However experts say they are uncertain how this will be
 interpreted or defined in practice.   Most insurers formally define
 environmental  impairment as "emission, discharge,  dispersal, dis-
 posal, seepage, release, or escape of any liquid,  solid,  gaseous,
or thermal  irritant,  contaminant,  or pollutant into or upon land,

-------
                                 -82-
 the atmosphere,  or  any  watercourse  or  body of water."   Some  extend
 this to  include  the "generation  of  odor,  noises,  vibrations,  light,
 electricity,  radiation,  changes  in  temperature, or any other  sen-
 sory phenomena."  Some  common, but  not universal  exclusions  from
 EIL coverage  are  genetic  damage, workman's compensation or work-re-
 lated risks,  nuclear risks,-and  results of willful acts.
      There are great differences between  EIL policies, also,  on
 the coverage  of sites.  Of eleven primary insurers compared  by
 Douglas  McLeod in a  recent issue of Business Insurance  (100), nine
 do  not cover  the costs of cleaning up  the policyholders' own  sites;
 one will do so only  if the clean-up is ordered by the government.
 All  eleven cover the  policyholder's liability for cleaning up the
 property of a third  party, but the insurer must usually give  prior
 consent  to the cleanup.  Some insurers will, and some will not,
 cover third-party liability associated with "pre-existing conditions"
 at  dispersed  dump sites targeted by Superfund, and the conditions
 for such coverage differ from insurer  to insurer.   Some policies
 give  blanket  coverage for all sites, but some will cover only sites
 specified in  the policy.
    •  Some insurers will  not cover the cost of defending a policyhol-
 der against pollution lawsuits, or will issue another separate poli-
 cy  to cover these costs.  All insurers require "risk assessment,""
 but  the nature of these assessments, and whether the costs are borne
 by  the applicant or by the insurer differs from case to case.  Near-
 ly all of these points will  be argued, tested,  and probably standard-
 ized over the next few years.
     The first effort by chemical waste generators to recover the
money paid by them for a waste site cleanup under  Superfund is a
suit filed by Union  Carbide  against International  Insurance Company
on November 8, 1983, (IP-83-1419-C,S.D.,  Ind.),  with a cross-claim
against the owners and operators  of the site.   The complaint against
the insurance company alleges that  coverage was  demanded and denied
under an applicable  policy and asks for reimbursement and  declara-
tory relief as to  future costs.  (101)

-------
                                -83-
     The overall growth of insurance for "non-sudden" pollution is
 reported to have been below the industry's expectations, probably
 because of the recession.  Underwriters are still uncertain of
 the risks they are assuming, and are" conservative about the aggre-
 gate limits of the policies.  Corporate risk managers may be reluc-
 tant to buy coverage that is expensive yet would not cover a catas-
 trophic loss.  Another reason for slow growth is that while the
 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requires waste handlers to
 be insured or to qualify as self-insurers, there has been little
 enforcement of this provision until  recently.  (The responsibility
 for enforcement belongs to the states  after they have an EPA-ap-
 proved plan for regulation of hazardous waste disposal.)
     However, some insurers now report that business has picked up
 considerably within the last six months, and will probably continue
 to grow.   The general  trend is expected to be toward higher premi-
 ums and higher deductibles, as experience on which to base rates is
 accumulated.   The rising costs will  have a disproportionate impact
 on small  companies.  (102)
     The impact of product liability awards and accompanying
 insurance costs on chemical industry planning and finances is
 substantial.   Normal  product liability premium costs run about
 0.5% to 1.0% of sales (with the lower rates for large policies).
 If, for example, Dow carried its liability insurance with a
 commercial  company, this would mean  premium costs of about
 $100 million  on sales (1982) of a little over $10 billion.  The
 number becomes significant when compared to Dow's 1982 operating
profits of $356 million.  To take an extreme case, the claims
 filed --  though not yet awarded -- against Johns Manville for
asbestos-related illness are estimated by Manville to total about
 $4.9 billion, about five times the company's worth.   Claims
 stemming  from Love Canal and related disposal sites  have been
estimated at  $10 billion.   (103)
     Chemical companies are beginning  to feel the same pressures

-------
                                -84-
 to which  pharmaceutical companies have long been subject.  The
 case  of Merrell Dow  illustrates  the problems of a company
 producing direct  consumer-use  products as  consumers  become
 more  aware of  their  extensive  exposure to  chemicals  in day-to-day
 life.
      Merrell Dow  Pharmaceuticals unexpectedly ceased
      production of the anti-morning sickness drug Bendectin
      in 1983,  saying that the  company expected to lose
      money on  it  due to insurance premium  costs.  The U.S.
      sales revenues  from Bendectin were about $13 million;
      insurance premium totalled more than  $10 million for
      this FDA-approved drug.   When scientific studies on
      the  health effects of Bendectin -- especially terato-
      genicity  —  were inconclusive, the company was  facing
      several hundred lawsuits.  (104)
      While such multibillion dollar liability claims are the
 exception rather  than the rule, the unpredictability of such
 latent claims  and the contribution of such chance factors as
 scientific discovery, accidents, and media and public activism,
 which might come  from five to  forty years  in the future, make the
 concern a real one for chemical companies.
     There is reported to be some decrease in oversight by third
party insurers. (105)   It is a standard practice of  insurance com-
panies to inspect the operations of large clients and to offer
substantial discounts for safe practices.   While most companies --
for their own benefit -- use a good deal  of external  quality con-
trol, self-insurance places the burden of quality control  on the
company itself.
     Regulations requiring the carrying of insurance, as are in
effect now under Subtitle C of RCRA, encourage safe waste manage-
ment to fulfill the requirements of insurance companies. (106)
The threat of higher premiums or loss  of coverage for violation of
standards  set forth in  insurance policies  may, in the long run, be
a more effective check   on waste operations than possible EPA
enforcement action.

-------
                                -85-


                        CHAPTER 4

           SOCIAL AND POLITICAL TRENDS AFFECTING

           PRODUCTION AND REGULATION OF CHEMICALS
          Political behavior will be shaped by an age group
          characterized by political activism and environ-
          mental and heal th'- commitments, and by greater
          influence of women, minorities, and the elderly.
          Environmental interest groups are forming alliances
          with other interests, such as labor.  General en-
          vironmental concerns will become sharply focused
          on direct health impacts.  International environ-
          mental and health issues may be significant in
          both diplomatic and trade affairs.  State and
          local toxic risk legislation will increase greatly
          but the public will also demand greater Federal
          intervention.  Two factors must be reconciled in
          further legislation and regulation:.the growing
          consensus favoring more flexible cross-media
          control  strategies, and possible reduction in
          agency discretion as Congress reacts to loss of
          the legislative veto.  Major policy issues will
          include liability and victim compensation, public
          and labor right-to-know provisions,  and genetic
          screening.   Further public alarms appear highly
          likely,  especially from groundwater contamination
          and hazardous transport accidents, and will  further
          stimulate demand for greater control of all  toxic
          materials.
A.  LONG-RANGE SOCIETAL TRENDS
     The social  and political  trends which will  have a direct impact
on chemical  industries in the  next decade must be seen in the context
of longer range  trends affecting society as a whole.  An appreciation
of this context  provides the filter to use in identifying and assess-
ing the likelihood and the significance of changes in political  atti-
tudes and in governmental response that will  in  turn influence industry
decisions.   These long-range trends include changes in:
     -- the  age  and the ethnic characteristics of the population,

     -- the  makeup of the labor force,

     -- the  location of people and of Industry,

-------
                               -86-
      —  levels  of education
      —  economic  conditions,  and
      —  international  factors  in America's  political  environment.
      Changes  in demographic patterns  —  the age  structure  of  the
 population, where people  live, where  and how they work  or  play,
 their income  and  lifestyle — will  be a  factor in the long run
 directly affecting the chemical industry.   Such  trends  affect the
 kinds of chemicals that are produced  and how they are used, how
 many  people are exposed to what kind  of  risks, and  the  likelihood
 that  they will  accept  a given  level of risk.  The acceptance  of
 risk, and the propensity  to demand  governmental  action  to  reduce
 risks, is generally  considered to be  related to  age,  education,
 affluence, ethnicity,  and culture-,  in ways  that  are significant,
 although still  little  understood.
 1.  Demographic Trends
      The population  of this country will  continue to  grow  for at
 least another fifty  years.  But it  is  growing slowly.  There  are
 no  indications  that  the present low birth rate will rise signifi-
 cantly in the next few years.  Even by 2030, if  present trends
 continue, the population will be only  20% larger than today,  and
 stable.   Life expectancy  is rising; it has  increased  about 3.5
 years in  the  last  decade  (1), but further dramatic increases  will
 depend on progress in conquering the  diseases related to age  and
 reducing  environmental-related diseases.
      The  proportion  of all Americans who are over 65  has risen
 from  4%  in 1960 to 11.4% in 1980,  and will continue to rise — to
 12% in 2000 and at least 22% in 2025.  (2)  A large majority of
 these will be women.  This means  that greater attention will  be
 focused on environmental causes of disease and on environmental
 factors that contribute to the disabilities associated with aging.
     The  largest and fastest growing age group for the next decade
will be those from 33 to 45  years  old.  This will have greater im-
pact on social behavior and  political-economic institutions than
the increase  in  numbers of the elderly.

-------
                              -87-
     The 33-45 year olds are the baby boom generation.  The atti-
 tudinal characteristics of this age cohort have included emphasis
 on physical fitness, demand for environmental protection, suspicion
 of large institutions, and political activism.  Social psychologists
 believe that there is a strong tendency for sociopolitical attitudes
 formed in youth to persist in later life.
     Legal  and illegal immigration will be a major factor in popu-
 lation growth.  Because recent immigrants, Hispanics, and American
Blacks have higher birth rates than the rest of the population,
racial  and  ethnic minorities will  make up a larger percentage of
the population in 1995; one in four Americans will be Black or
 Hispanic (3) compared to 18% in 19800
     The Southwest will be increasingly bicultural and bilingual.
Already New Mexico is 37% and Texas 21% Hispanic.  (4)
     The ethnic minorities have generally not been environmental
activists,  but have had other political priorities.  This may tend
 to moderate environmental activism in the Southwest where there are
many chemical  industry facilities.
     Of people in the labor force who are between 25 and 30 now,
 86% have finished high school and about 23% have finished college.(5)
The educational level of the work force and the general population
will continue to rise over the next decade.  The number of produc-
tion jobs has  been declining for several decades and will decline
further with the move toward programmable automation.  There is a
strong and  growing movement toward greater job mobility, not only
mid-career  retraining and second or third careers  during the work-
ing lifetime,  but less deliberate and less welcome employment
instability in which a person may be forced to move between jobs and
from white-collar to blue-collar jobs or from production to service
jobs.
     By all criteria, the U.S.  is  post-industrial.  Daniel  Bell
defined a post-industrial  society as one in which:
     -- services rather than goods-production is the dominant
        economic activity,

-------
      —  the professional  and  technical  class  constitute  the  pre-
         eminent occupational  category,
      --  theoretical  knowledge is  the  central  source  of  innovation
         and of policy  formulation,
      —  policy is  oriented  toward assessment  and  control  of  technol-
         ogy as a determinant  of future  directions, and
      —  a  new intellectual  technology supports decision-making. (6)
      The percentage  of U.S. jobs  directly related to collecting,
 storing, manipulating, disseminating, and using information  is
 estimated  to have  been 8% in  1900,  18%  in 1950, and  52%  in 1980. (7)
      While the proportion of  the  work force likely to be  exposed
 to  toxic chemicals in  the workplace is  declining, both work  force
 mobility and increased access  to, and familiarity with,  technical
 and theoretical  information will  tend to widely disseminate  concerns
 about hazardous conditions  in  the work  force, and in the  community
 at  large.   Organized interests, such as labor unions and  environ-
 mental groups,  are acquiring  technical  expertise and pooling
 resources  to  encourage research in support of their political
 efforts.
      About  70% of women in their  early  20's are now in the work
 force, and  over half of women with children under six years old
 are working.  (8)  The  labor force participation for men of all ages
 is about 77%.   In 1995, it is projected that women will  make up nearly
 half  of  the work force.   The number of women in professional  and mana-
 gerial jobs will be considerably higher than at present, as  indi-
 cated by the  increased number of women completing professional,
managerial, and scientific training and accumulating the necessary
experience for middle and upper management.
     These factors  tend to strengthen concerns about toxic chemi-
cals in the workplace and their reproductive and  genetic effects;
they also tend to increase the influence of women and their politi-
cal  priorities.  The  large number  of dual  income  families indicates
a continuing trend  toward general  affluence and high expectations,
and will  also contribute to  increased independence among workers --
that is,  less inclination to accept unsatisfactory working con-
ditions.

-------
                              -89-
      In  1982, there were approximately 717,000 scientists and engi-
 neers  in R&D in a U.S. labor force of approximately 112 million,
 or 64  per  10,000 workers.  (9)  This ratio, which is higher than
 any other  country except the Soviet Union, decreased slowly from
 1971-1979, but has resumed its long-term rise with the development
 of new science-based industries.  In 1981, the last data available,
 Japan  had  a ratio of 55.6, compared to 62.4 for the U.S. and
 between 8908 and 10204 (differing estimates) for the U.S.S.R.
 This is yet another indication of increasing sophistication about
 scientific and technical issues in the work force and in the popu-
 lation at  large.  Industrial and government management of toxic
 substances will need to be appropriately defensible, interactive,
 and explicit,,
     Household formation has increased much faster than population
 in recent decades. (10)  While this trend faltered during the
 recent recession, it is unlikely to be reversed.  The number of
 households no longer closely reflects the number of traditional
 families,,  There are many single person households.  Americans are
marrying later, and less permanently; there is a trend toward
 delayed childbirth, and about 25% of women now in their twenties,
 based on their own expectations, probably will remain childless.
Voluntary households of unrelated adults and cohabitating non-
married couples are increasing in the fastest growing age groups,,
 It is projected that non-standard households, those not made
up of traditional  nuclear families, will  continue to increase
from under 15% in 1960 to about 30% to 35% in 19950 (11)  A rapid
rate of household formation obviously expands the market for
housing, household furnishings, etc.
     Some regions  of the United States, especially in the Rocky
Mountain, southern,  and western regions,  will  continue to grow
faster than the country as  a whole, although the Sunbelt migration
is slowing,,  The pace  of migration over the next decade will  depend
on the occurrence  and  impact of water shortages and rising costs

-------
                               -go-
 of water,  the further expansion  of domestic  energy  and  minerals
 development (which  is likely  within the  decade),  and  the  extent
 to which conditions  in the  growing Sunbelt areas  come to  approxi-
 mate those from which the migrants fled  — rising land  and  housing
 costs,  excess labor,  rising taxes, congestion and pollution,  etc.(12)
 Industrial  migration  has paralleled population migration, less
 because of the relocation of  facilities  than because of the differ-
 ent rates  of start-up,  closing,  or expansion of businesses  in grow-
 ing vs.  shrinking market areas.
      A  stronger demographic trend  is the decentralization of  people
 and industry — growth  in rural  areas, non-metropolitan counties,
 and smaller cities, while larger cities and metropolitan areas are
 stable  or  shrinking.   By 1995 the  cumulative effects of this  trend
 over two decades will  be striking;  a general deconcentration  and a
 blurring of the distinctions  between urban, suburban, and rural.  (13)
 The long-range economic effects  will be much less disparity in
 income  between regions of the country and between urban and rural
 areas.
      All these trends point toward  a diffusion, sharing, and homog-
 enization of political attitudes and behavior across the nation.
 2.   International Trends
      While  the  general trend in  the U.S.  and in most advanced nations
 is  toward slow  growth and eventual  decline in population,  world popu-
 lation  is growing rapidly,  with most of the growth concentrated in
 the  least developed nations.  By the year 2000,  world population
will  have increased from the present five billion to at least six
billion. (14)  Growing urbanization and industrialization  in develop-
ing  nations  is  increasing the strain on both renewable and non-renew-
able  resources.
     National economies are  increasingly  intermeshed and both  resource
supplies and markets are becoming more highly competitive.  Develop-
ing nations are struggling  to  develop indigenous  industries, rang-
ing from steel, chemicals, and heavy manufacturing to electronics
and consumer goods.

-------
                              -91-
     The threat of depletion of much of the world's "renewable re-
sources" is more likely and more immediate than depletion of non-
renewable resources.  Forests, grasslands, cultivated cropland,
fisheries, wildlife, and fresh water supplies are being strained
by population growth, urbanization, and industrialization.  (15)
Significant growth in world demand for U.S. agricultural commodi-
ties and timber is expected within the next two decades.
     The environmental political movement, far from disappearing,
is rapidly being internationalized.  International labor coalitions
and foreign labor organizations are exerting increased political
influence to further their increasing emphasis on health and safety.
Further, international tensions and international political  pres.-
sures will be increasingly important factors in the domestic po-
litical environment.  American-owned,multinational corporations,
including chemical companies, will  find rising concern about the
effects of toxic chemicals in other countries, as well as in the
United States.
     In summary, long-range demographic and social trends indicate
that the importance of environmental  and public health concerns in
the larger social  and political agenda is likely to grow rather
than to diminish.
3.  Economic Conditions
     Specific economic projections  for the next decade would be fool-
hardy,  but some global and national trends can serve as general
assumptions to underlie the political  discussion.  They are:
     •   Increasing interdependence  of world markets and national
        economies  and currencies,  and intense competition for
        both raw materials and markets,
     •   higher prices for the necessary factors of production,
     9   strong incentives for increased utilization of domestic
        resources  of energy and materials,
     •   expansion  of agriculture with  emphasis on export of  food,
     •   new and  rapidly expanding  industries  with a high scien-
        tific  component,  such as biotechnology,
     •   as  a  consequence,  continuing  competition for capital  and
        generally  high interest rates,

-------
                               -92-
      •   as  a  further consequence of new high-tech industries and
         automation  in older  industries, a large and relatively
         intractable problem  of unemployment,
      •   continuing growth in social welfare costs, because of the
         large number of elderly and unemployed,
      •   in  spite of these problems, a gradual return to the long-
         range trend of increasing affluence and decreasing dis-
         parities in income across the population.
      From 1945 to 1980 Americans became steadily more prosperous.
Disposable  personal income and median family income increased.   The
percentage  of people below the poverty line slowly declined.  (16)
The disparity of incomes between Whites and Blacks was very slightly
reduced.  Disparities in income between geographical  regions  were
sharply  reduced.   Disparities in income betv/een urban-and rural  areas
were  also reduced,  especially in the 1970's.  (17)  Home ownership,
possession of durable goods,  and other measures of economic well-
being increased steadily.   The "net worth" of the nation quadrupled.
      As  a result of inflation, the rising costs of energy, and  the
recession of the early 1980's, there has been some slippage in  the
last  three years.  There was  a 5.5% decrease in real  income in
1980  and more thereafter.   The number of people below the poverty
line  increased, and Black family incomes slipped relative to  that
of White families.
      Economic forecasts are at present highly uncertain and politi-
cized.   But the most prevalent expectations are that real  income
will  eventually resume a rising trend, although at a  slower rate
of growth as real economic growth slows.
     America is a solidly middle class country.   Compared  to
other nations there is  relatively little disparity in standards
of living, education,  social  behavior and social  attitudes across
regions, across urban/rural  communities,  across ethnic groups,  and
even across  socio-economic classes.   The differences  may appear
large and in some cases troublesome because our political  philoso-
phy of pluralistic  democracy  seeks  to give representation, balance,
and visibility to competing demands and interests.   In spite  of

-------
                              -93-
this, our geographic and social  mobility, highly integrated na-

tional  economy, public education systems, and national  communica-

tion systems tend to reduce differences and homogenize culture,

and to  make the population as a  whole middle class in social  and

political  expectations and 'behavior.


B.   POLITICAL TRENDS 1984-1995

1.   The Continuing Growth  of an  Environmental  Coalition

     Health, longevity, and physical  fitness are a national avoca-

tion, almost an obsession.  The general public is well aware of a

link between health and the physical  environment.  This increases
public support for environmental protection.  This focus of national

attention will grow because:
     — we have the affluence and standard of living that provides
        a margin for discretionary allocation of time and money
        to health and physical fitness;

     — the largest and most rapidly  growing layer of the popu-
        lation will be in their 30's  and 40's, with relatively high
        earning power, small families, and many dual-income house-
        holds;

     -- this age group was socialized (matured to a stage of politi-
        cal awareness) during the 1970's, a period of political ac-
        tivism, strong environmental  concern, and high distrust of
        government and business  institutions;

     -- rapid advances in medical/biological sciences are constantly
        producing new information about the systematic health effects of
        environmental  factors, expecially in areas of reproductive
        functioning, birth defects, neuromuscular and brain func-
        tion, and the sources of cancer and heart disease;

     -- awareness  of slow  development diseases  such as  asbestosis
        and some cancers related to environmental/occupational  fac-
        tors  will  increase as the number of old people  in-
        creases,  especially those  whose work lives  began  in  the
        1940's  --  the  time of the  chemical  industrial  revolution;
        and

     --  we  have a  relatively well  educated  population,  increasingly
        oriented  toward  information and  increasingly  exposed  to
        knowledge  about  science,  technology,  and  related  policy
        issues.

-------
                              -94-
     Public support for environmental protection, public health,
ana ecological concerns will remain strong, according to the evi-
dence from opinion polls.  A New York Times public opinion poll in
September 1982 showed that 52% of those questioned believed that
protecting the environment was so important that requirements and
standards could not be too high, and improvements should continue
regardless of their costs.  This level of support is significant,
especially considering that the economy was in the midst of reces-
sion and high unemployment, with administrative policies that em-
phasized deductions in the scope and extent of Federal  regulation. (18)
     The Issues Management Letter reported in April 1984 that
"For months national data have been showing strong public concern
over chemical contamination issues...  (A)s much as 25% of local
coverage (in newspapers) is regularly devoted to health and,en-
vironmental problems, no region can avoid the national  trend."  (19)
     Few environmental questions reflect class alignments,,  In-
stead, Americans have come to regard a clean environment as a
"basic material value," according to researcher Everett Carl! Ladd,
in Public Opinion in March 1982*  An increasing number of people
believe that environmental protection laws/regulations  have not
gone far enough according to the Roper Organization Polls, 1973-
1981.  (20)  See Exhibit 14.
     A survey by J. F. Coates, Inc.  (21)  shows that the following
areas  are of major and growing concern to constituency  groups
ranging from business people and scientists to public interest
groups:
     — groundwater contamination,
     — toxic substances and hazardous wastes, and
     — chemical  fertilizers and pesticides.

-------
                             -95-
    Percent
    SO
    30
    10
               EXHIBIT 14
PUBLIC  PERCEPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS
      AND REGULATIONS,  1973-1981


    Environmental protection laws'regulations have
                Struct* about rjgnt balance
                    Not gone far enough

                                   Gone loo far
         Oct.   Oct.   Oct..   Oct.   Sep.
       1973    1974   1975   1976   1977   1978
                                   Sep. Sep./Oct. Sep.
                                 1979   J980   1981
      '"« Quest-on as«ed was Tr>e»e aie   din«itng oom «•« •»« go^e ^
      iai o*otect "Oi '»' enou^n. o< "av« »nue« < o
       Oon i «now/no answer ' 'vsoonses c>oi o}-i98i
    From:  The Conservation  Foundation;  State of  the
           Environment 1982,  p. 425.
      There has  been a  slight decrease in  the number of Americans
that  consider  themselves  conservative, according  to the April  1982
National Opinion Research Center  poll.  Of the registered  voters
in  1980, 46% of those  under 30 and 22% of those over 50 identified
themselves as Independent.   This  poll projects that in 1990,  60%
of  those under  30 and  45% of those over 50 will identify themselves
as  independents.  Democrats and  independents tend to be more  in favor
of  environmental protection via  regulation than are conservatives.  (22)
      Women have become  increasingly active in political  affairs and
are thought to  be especially favorable toward environmental and
public  health legislation.

-------
                               -96-
      While  voting  in  local  and  national  elections  has  been  declin-
 ing,  other  kinds of political activism  have  probably been growing.
 This  may  reflect a general  re-orientation of political activity  to-
 ward  issues  rather than  toward  candidates -- a depersonalization
 of politics,  a  determination on the part of  individual citizens  to
 influence decisions more  specifically and directly instead  of  leav-
 ing them  to  elected representatives.  One example of this trend  is
 in the  growth of ad hoc organizations formed  to represent particu-
 lar political viewpoints  or organizational interests,  the political
 action  committee or PAC.
      There were over  3300 PACs  in the U.S. in 1983, a  16% increase
 over  the  previous year.   Most of these  PACs  represent  an industry
 or a  special  economic  interest, although the number of PACs that
 are not connected to  industry has grown, over the last  five years.
 Campaign  and  Congressional  experts report that these groups will
 continue  to be a dominant force in U.S. politics.  Many of  them  are
 specifically  intended  to  be a counterbalance  to environmental  and
 other public  interest  groups.  (23)
Environmental Activism and Emerging  Political Alliances
     Conservation groups made their  first big political impact
in the 1982 election,  led by the Sierra Club and Friends  of the
Earth.  They actively  and effectively  campaigned for and  against
specific candidates.  (24)   The  League of Conservation Voters,
the oldest environmental  political action committee,  was  formed
in 1970.  In the 1982  elections  it spent over $1  million  and mo-
bilized  hundreds of volunteers  in 77 political campaigns.
     There are 1,860 organizations  actively involved with environ-
mental concerns  in  the U.S.  and  Canada, including citizen groups,
State and Federal  agencies,  and  national and international  commis-
sions, according to the National Wildlife Federation's  1984 Conser-
vation Directory.  A decade earlier,  the 1974 Directory identified
only 700-800 environmental groups.  (25)

-------
                               -97-
      The strength of these organizations lies in grass roots organi-
 zation.  They may be  even more powerful over the next decade than
 they are now.  Issues like toxic substances and hazardous wastes
 are so personal, so frightening to the average citizen, explained
 one environmentalist, that "the issues drive themselves. (26)
      As these networks, national and international,  grow in number
 and strength, their influence and ability to mobilize public opin-
 ion and action will  increase.
      Environmental  concerns are institutionalized in Federal and
 State bureaucracies, Congressional  committees, and private sector
 institutions, e.g:  organized interest groups, publications, spe-
 cialized law firms,  consulting firms, etc.   These institutions,
 like all  institutions,  strive to perpetuate themselves by strength-
 ening public support for envirbnmental  concerns.   These interests
 are also buttressed  by  a complex legal  framework, put in place  in
 the 1970's  and 1980's,  that would be difficult to dismantle without
 great public support and Congressional  action,, (27)
      Increasing cooperation and coordination  among environmental
 organizations are giving them  a new  amount  and range of influence.
 The ten leading environmental groups* had a combined 1983 budget of
 $94.9 million. (28)   The leaders of these ten groups meet regularly
 to coordinate political and research strategies.  The strengths and
 resources of each group can contribute to a combined front0
*Environmental  Defense Fund, Environmental  Policy Institute, Izaak
Walton League,  National  Audubon Society, Friends of the Earth,
National Parks  and Conservation Association, National  Wildlife
Federation, Natural  Resources Defense Council, Sierra  Club, Wilder-
ness Society.

-------
                               -98-
      The  Global  Tomorrow  Coalition was formed in 1979, sparked by
 the Global  2000  report.   Based on a futures outlook and focusing
 on  the  interwoven  issues  of  population, resource consumption,
 and environment, it  incorporates influential U.S. business, reli-
 gious,  environmental, governmental, and scientific interests with
 many ties to equally influential leaders in other countries.
      The  Environmental Liaison Centre based in Kenya links 200
 member  organizations from 69 countries to environmental issues
 from a  Third World perspective.  It has ties to over 3,000 non-
 governmental organizations worldwide.   (29)
      The most politically potent alliance for the next decade
 may  be  that between labor and environmental  interests.   Recogni-
 tion  of shared goals and the power of cooperation brought together
 labor and environmental  organizations  in 1981  to form a loosely
 knit  network.   A June 1982 summit conference drew 115 representatives
 from  both camps.  (30)    The network pools  lobbying  efforts at both
 State and Federal levels where their interests  coincide.   Much of
 its recent work has been on right-to-know  legislation.
     Many scientists have been active  in the movement for environ-
mental protection.   But  many scientists, and perhaps, especially
chemists,  are  closely tied professionally  to large  corporations,
and their professional  interests  are targeted on the  development
 of  useful chemicals rather than on identification of their undesir-
 able  side effects or on their regulation and control.  In 1965 the
 American Chemical Society (ACS) formed a Committee on Chemistry and
 Public Affairs, which adopted environmental  improvement as an area
 particularly appropriate for its public service mandate.   The ACS
 already had a  strong interest in environmental  problems centering
 in  its Division of Water, Air, and Waste Chemistry.   These two
 divisions of the society recruited a task  force of member experts
which produced, in 1969, a report entitled Cleaning Our Environment:
 The Chemical Basis for Acticm.  The report highlighted several prob-
 lem areas:

-------
                                -99-
     t  the primitive condition of fundamental  knowledge about how
        living things are affected by long-term, low-level  exposure
        to pollutants,
     9  the even more primitive state of knowledge about the effects
        of pollutants on the ecology, and
     •  the need for better analytical chemical  methods to  monitor,
        control, and study the environment. (31)
The report included no less than 73 detailed recommendations about
actions to improve "the air environment, the water environment, solid
waste management, and pesticides in the environment." Recognizing
that 73 recommendations was an unmanageable number, unlikely to get
effective attention, the task force then went on to abstract from
these 26 priority recommendations that appeared  in A Supplement to
the original  report, published in 1971.  Both the first and second
sets of recommendations focused on the conventional categories of
air pollution (especially motor vehicle exhausts and fossil fuel  com-
bustion),  water pollution (especially eutrophication and waste water
treatment sludge), and municipal  refuse (especially junked  automo-
biles).  There was a great deal of attention to  pesticides  in the
environment,  which accounted for eight of the 26 priority .recom-
mendations.   However, the American Chemical Society, in spite of
the high concentration of industrial  chemists in its membership,
did not call  attention to the problems associated with the  manu-
facture, use, or disposal of other toxic chemicals and their pre-
sence in the  environment.

2.  Risk Management
     Decisionmaking on toxic substances increasingly will be founded
on institutionalized risk assessment.  The evolving process of risk
management—initial  identification of potential  hazard, the quanti-
fication of hazard and exposure analysis, assessment of the potential
societal risk,  and the application of this knowledge to policy--

-------
                               -100-'


is likely to be a key to foreseeing the effect of future public

policy issues on chemical industries.

     Risk assessment is especially important to regulatory agencies
such as EPA, which must make policy decisions based on partial,
tentative, and sometimes conflicting information, and across a

wide range of qualitatively and quantitatively different hazards.
As society becomes more aware of the risks posed by products, life-

styles, industries, and environment, they will  increasingly demand
more responsive government decisionmaking.

Interacting factors promoting the use  of risk assessment include:

     • The demand for answerability and openness of government
       policymaking; risk assessment creates a  record of the
       data, methods, and priorities used in decisionmaking.
     • The increasing sensitivity of Americans  to lower levels
       of risk and more subtle forms of risk.

     • Continuing demand for an improved lifestyle,  to which
       health and security—freedom from imposed risk—are key
       contributors.

     • Rise of autonomy and freedom of choice as political  and
       social  goals.   These must be founded  on  explicit knowledge
       of the different options,  including the  risks  of each.

     • Improved technical  capability to measure hazards;  for
       example to detect and measure chemicals  in air,  water,
       soil,  etc.;  or to conduct  extensive epidemiological
       studies  in  response to  an  observed or suspected hazard.
     • Institutional  experience in conducting and using risk
       assessment,  which provides  some indication of  how  to  im-
       prove methodology and where risk assessment can most
       usefully  be  applied and  updated.

     • More  complex and  extensive  computer technology,  useful  both
       directly  in  data  handling  in risk  assessment and indirectly
       in  gathering information and improving communication  and
       expert  and public participation  in  assessments.       ..,

     • The  increasing  complexity of technological  systems, which
       tends  to  make  risks  potentially  more  catastrophic  while
       at  the  same  time  making  them less  obvious  to the casual
       observer  or  the  isolated expert.   This increases the  need  .
       for a more formalized, multidisci piinary  approach  to  identi-
       fying and assessing  risks.

     • A  lengthened horizon;  individuals  and  industry  are increas-
       ingly aware  of the  life  cycle implications  of  a  technology
       or  process.   They are concerned  about  risks  to  future  gener-
       ations,  and  risks from  future use  of  disposal  or shutdown
       of  a  current technology  or  process.

-------
                             -101-
3.  Federal Legislation
     During the 1970's, public concern about the environment gave
rise to a range of Federal and State legislation.  But the pendulum
of Congressional support for the environment swung repeatedly during
this period.  The environmental activism of Congress in the early
1970's gave way in the late 1970's to concerns about the effects
of over-regulation.
     A new generation of legislative initiatives has emerged in the
last decade involving:
     -- development of adequate Information on the toxic effects
        of chemicals on human health and the environment;
     -- development of information on the manner and degree to
        which humans and the environment may be exposed to hazards
        as a consequence of commerce in these chemicals;
     -- notification by manufacturers to public officials of infor-
        mation on effects and exposure;
     — assessment of risks to human health and the environment;
     — control  by suitable means of those risks perceived as unac-
        ceptable, including packaging and labeling to inform of
        hazard,  as well  as restrictions and bans, as appropriate.
     The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (P.L. 94-469) em-
powered the Federal government to control or stop the production
and use of chemical substances that may present an unreasonable
risk of injury to health  or to  the environment  (Sec. 5).
Manufacturers  of all  new  chemicals and  chemicals put to significant
new uses must  give EPA 90 days  notice before manufacturing
begins.  Any chemical  not on  the  inventory  of existing chemicals
is considered  new.  EPA can require testing of chemicals,
whether new or already in production, only  if the chemical
meets all  of the following  criteria:
     •  there are grounds to conclude that it may present an un-
        reasonable risk,  or there may be substantial  exposure,
     •  data for predicting health and environmental  effects are
        inadequate, and

-------
                                -102-
      t   testing  is  necessary  to  develop  the  data,  which may  re-
         late to  carcinogenic, mutagenic,  teratogenic,  behavioral,
         and  synergistic  effects  and  to persistance.  (Sec.4)
 EPA can  regulate any  aspect of the chemicals' use  and  can  take
 immediate action if there  is  an  imminent  hazard. The agency  can
 issue rules  for  specific chemicals requiring manufacturers and pro-
 cessors  to report information about  the chemical,  production levels,
 projected exposure  rates,  etc.
      TSCA established an Interagency Testing Committee (ITC)  to pre-
 pare a list  of chemicals recommended for  priority  consideration for
 testing.   The list  is to contain no more  than 50 chemicals at any
 time; EPA must respond within 12 months either by  proposing  testing
 or  declaring a rationale for not requiring testing. (Sec.4)  During
 the  first three years of implementation EPA did not respond  to ITC's
 recommendations.  In 1979  the Natural Resources Defense Council chal-
 lenged EPA's lack of action in court, (NRDC vs.  Costle, 14ERC 1858
 (S.D.N.Y., 1980)) and the  court ordered EPA to establish a schedule
 for  clearing the  backlog,  EPA subsequently took action on a num-
 ber  of chemicals.   In some cases, it negotiated agreements with man-
 ufacturers for.voluntary testing.
      TSCA also gave EPA  authority to prohibit or limit the manu-
 facture,  processing,  distribution, use, and  disposal of old  chemi-
 cals --  that is,  those that were introduced  before TSCA was  passed
 —  if they are found  to  pose  "an unreasonable risk."  The controls
 that are  possible range  from  total prohibition to  labeling of con-
 tents.   Regulatory  limitations have  been  put on specific uses (or
 disposal) of a few  chemicals  including chlorofluorocarbons,  asbes-
 tos, and  dioxin.  The difficulty is  that  there are  about  55,000
 chemicals in use, and for many of them, there are no  aggregated
 data on manufacturers, volume, production, and sales  and  little
 information  about uses,  exposure, or potential effects.

     Section 8 of TSCA is of particular interest because  it concerns
the  information  that manufacturers must collect  or  supply and this
is related to the right to know  issue (see Ch.4,  Sec.  B.).   Sec.  8c
and related EPA  regulations require  that  records  of adverse health

-------
                               -103-
and environmental  reactions to.chemicals be retained.   Under Sec.

8d, EPA requires manufacturers, processors and distributors to sub-

nit lists of unpublished health and safety studies of which they

are aware, relating to chemicals.   Sec.  8e requires that EPA be in-
formed immediately of any information or evidence that a chemical

presents a substantial risk of injury to health or the environment.

These sections of course supplement Sec. 4 which allows EPA to re-
quire testing.

     A TSCA Improvement Amendments  Bill  was proposed by Congressmen
Florio and Eckhart on November 3,  1983 (H.R.  4304).  It would sig-

nificantly strengthen TSCA in the  following ways:

     •  The EPA Administrator would be required to promulgate a new
        rule mandating testing for  all  new chemicals requiring a
        Pre-Manufacturing Notice.  (Sec.5)
     •  EPA must place a chemical  on an :iinterim list," triggering
        the required filing of a PMN by all subsequent manufacturers
        and by the original  manufacturer,  if there is  a change in
        use, exposure, or production.  Substances would remain on the
        list until regulated or until  data is submitted providing  a
        reasonable basis to conclude regulation is not needed.  (Sec.6)

     •  The procedure for designating a  "significant new use"
        would be simplified:   consideration of a change in  only one
        factor (production volume,  exposure)  would be  sufficient.
        (Sec.7)

     •  EPA could  prohibit or restrict new chemicals solely on the
        basis of a determination that there is insufficient infor-
        mation to  evaluate its effects,  without a  need to determine
        that there is unreasonable  risk, or that it will  be pro-
        duced in substantial  quantities. (TSCA presently requires
        the last two  findings).  (Sec.8)

     •  EPA need not  first consider using  the authority of  other
        environmental  statutes before invoking TSCA.   TSCA  would
        have primary  jurisdiction  in appropriate cases and  would
        therefore  be  equal  in importance to other  environmental
        statutes.  (Sec.9)

     •  The grounds  for  withholding information as confidential
        would be significantly narrowed.   (Sec.10)

-------
                                 -104-
     •  Penalties would be made more severe and opportunities for
        continual challenges after agency enforcement actions would
        be closed off.  (Sec.11)

     •  EPA would be authorized to negotiate and then enforce volun-
        tary testing agreements without losing the power to subse-
        quently issue supplementary orders.  (Sec.3)

     f  Substances created by genetic engineering would specifical-
        ly fall under TSCA.   (Sec.2)


     Many critics think that TSCA -- or its implementation — has

been inadequate.  Among the most controversial issues are:

     t  whether the reliance on negotiated test agreements meet the
        law's requirement that EPA respond to the Interagency Test-
        ing Committee recommendations within one year;

     •  whether PMN reviews are adequate, and whether manufacturers
        submit enough data for a judgment (the chemical  industry
        generally favors a broad exemption for some classes of
        chemicals; others argue for establishment of broad cate-
        gories of chemicals for which extensive data would be re-
        quired);

     •  whether additional steps should be taken to bring the U.S.
        chemical review process into line with the requirements  of
        'its major trading partners, particularly OECD base require-
        ments ;

     •  whether public disclosure provisions are adequate; since
        most of the data submitted is declared confidential, cri-tics
        say there is no opportunity for public oversight as TSCA was
        intended to provide;

     •  whether EPA has been too conservative in using Section 6
        authority to control unreasonable risks; that is, has under-
        estimated the risks of some chemicals;

     •  whether EPA fras been overly reluctant to use its authority
        under Section 4(f) to assign regulatory priorities; for
        example, to designate formaldehyde as a priority chemical.

     Proposals have been introduced into Congress to amend TSCA  to
address these issues.

-------
                               -105-
     A new factor in future environmental  legislation will  be Con-
gressional reaction to loss of the option  of a legislative  veto, as
a result of the Supreme Court's Chadha Decision (1983).   Legisla-
tive vetos have not been widely used in environmental laws, but ex-
perts expect a general tightening up of all  regulatory legislation
and a reduction in the extensive amount of discretion that  Congress
has allowed regulatory agencies.  (32)
     In writing a legislative veto into a  law, Congress  delegates
authority to the Executive Branch but reserves the right to disap-
prove and thus nullify specific actions or decisions based  on the
delegated authority.
     A legislative veto seemed appropriate in regulatory legislation
where scientific knowledge is necessary in devising feasible means
of accomplishing Congressional objectives.  Nearly two-thirds of the
House voted in 1976 to apply the legislative veto to all regulatory
legislation, but the measure did not win support in the  Senate.
Opponents, including many environmentalists, objected because the
practice encourages regulatory agencies to negotiate regulatory
provisions with Congressional committee staff, without the  procedural
safeguards and opportunities for public participation which apply
to agency regulatory decisions.                         -
                                                        t>
     The Supreme Court decision,  which has no direct effect on TSCA,
invalidated 207 specific veto provisions in  126 laws.
     Congress is now trying to find some alternative procedure;
a Constitutional amendment to salvage the  legislative veto  power
is under consideration.  In the meantime,  several  proposed
amendments to TSCA are being rewritten as  a  result of the Supreme
Court decision to either strengthen the law  or to allow  some
exemptions.  Experts at the Congressional  Research Service  and
elsewhere say it is as yet impossible to evaluate either the
probability of their passage or their potential  impact.
     The most notable recent action by Congress  is the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1960
(the Superfund).  This has established a $1.6 billion fund  financed

-------
                                 -106-
 by U.S. chemical producers, to clean up hazardous substance spills
 and  inactive hazardous waste disposal sites.  Congress  is  likely  to
 deal  in the near future with further questions of liability and
 compensation.  This is undoubtedly the most important policy  issue
 for  chemical industries in the near future.  It will be discussed
 in Section 8 below.
      There is growing Congressional interest in governmental  fore-
 sight with respect to the environment and public health.  Two bills
 and  a resolution were introduced in the 98th Congress involving
 establishment of a Critical Trends Analysis Office and an Interagency
 Council of Global Resources, Environment and Populations, and
 expressing a "sense of the Congress" in favor of action along the
 lines proposed in Global 2000.   Another proposal may soon be  intro-
 duced that recommends establishment of an office within the Census
 Bureau to coordinate Federal data collection and analysis related
 to global trends.  (33)
     Many of the attempts to reduce Federal regulation of industry
 are meeting strong opposition.   Political  interest groups, lacking
 an ear in the White House, are  turning more to Congress for support.
 The courts a.re becoming more important in setting the regulatory
 agendas of Federal agencies.  The extent and form of judicial  review
 intended by Congress is increasingly being addressed in Congressional
 legislation, as discussed in Section 7.
 4.  Federal Regulations
     The responsibility for setting and enforcing regulatory  guide-
 guidelines is a responsibility  of the Executive Branch.  Federal
 agencies interpret Congressional  intent as expressed fh laws
 setting the mandate of the agency.   But they also reflect in  their
regulatory decisions the policies of the Administration.  The
legislative authorities affecting the life cycle of a chemical are
identified in  Exhibit  15.
      The Resource Conservation  and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA)
 governs the disposal of hazardous wastes from generation to dis-
 posal, providing for the tracking of wastes through a manifest sys-

-------
                                              -107-
                                            EXHIBIT 15
  LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITIES  AFFECTING THE LIFE CYCLE  OF A CHEMICAL
                                                                             INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
                                                                                  (OSHA. FIFRA)
  FEEDSTOCKS     MANUFACTURER S -
                                                        PROCESSOR
                        ._::: TSCA cr^.:_^^=^-" :-...-....^: TSCA
                                                                               UMtH KHC

                                                                               SA  \
                                                                               >CA    ^
                                                                                           i n c » A i
                                                                   CONSUMER PRODUCTS
                                                                     (CPSA.
                                                                     rFDCA
                                                                     r-FA.
                                                                     FHSA
                                                                     FIFHA
                                                                     PP'PAI
Ir
CAA
CPSA
FFDCA
FFA
FHSA
FIFRA
FWPCA.
                                    • KEY •
CLEAN AIP ACT                             HMTA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY ACT               OSHA
FED. FOOD. DRUG, & COSMETIC ACT             PPPA
FLAMMABLE FABRICS ACT                     RCRA
FED. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ACT             SDWA
FED. INSECTICIDE. FUNGICIDE. 6 RODENTICIDE ACT   TSCA
FED. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
                                                        = HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION ACT
                                                        = OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ACT
                                                        - POISON PREVENTION PACKAGING ACT
                                                        • RESOURCE CONSERVATION b RECOVERY ACT
                                                        = SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
                                                        = TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT
     Source:  EPA Journal,  July/August  1979.

-------
                                 -108-
 tem and  for  approval and monitoring of disposal sites.  Regula-
 tions  under  the Act went into effect in November 1980.  The Com-
 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
 (CERCLA, more commonly called Superfund) was passed in 1979 and
 governs  the  cleanup of old disposal sites.  Pesticides are regu-
 lated  under  the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
 Act (FIFRA)  first passed in 1948 and revised in 1972 and 1978.  There
 are proposals under consideration to amend CERCLA (especially to  "
 change the tax structure under which the cleanup is funded) and to
 amend FIFRA  (to strengthen the Act and to give EPA more authority
 to  deal with pesticide emergencies, such as the discovery of EDB
 in  many  foods).  In addition, chemicals in the environment are also
 regulated in various ways under provisions of the Consumer Products
 Safety Act, Food and Drug laws, and the Occupational Safety and
 Health Act, and others listed in Exhibit 15.
     Within EPA, organizational structure reflects the fragmenta-
 tion of the legal  authority, with different offices responsible for
 carrying out TSCA, RCRA, CERCLA, and the older laws listed in
 Exhibit  15, while OSHA and CPSA, for example, are administered by
entirely different agencies.  The problems of coordination are con-
 stant and difficult, and in fact some observers say that there is
 very little coordination.   The general  public,  on the other hand,
 tends not to recognize such distinctions and legal  niceties so that
any alarm over toxic or hazardous substances tends to add to the
criticism of EPA because it is seen as  the public watchdog.
     The current Administration has called for more attention to
balancing the costs  and benefits of regulation, allowing the mar-
ketplace to function by lowering Federal  intervention,  and decen-
tralizing government responsibilities  through New Federalism,  (34)
     Between 1980 and 1983, there were declines in the number of
pollution violation  cases  referred to government lawyers by EPA,
 in the number of Federal  inspections of hazardous waste dumps, and
 in the number of hazardous waste dumps  targeted for Superfund clean-
up, but these are  expected to rise in 1984 due to policies advocated
 bv  EPA's new administrator. (35)

-------
                                 -109-
     New forms of indirect regulation are emerging.  RCRA requires
owners and operators of waste disposal sites to carry liability in-
surance.  Insurance companies are raising their rates and develop-
ing new risk analysis techniques and inspection programs. (36)
(See Chap.3, Sec.D)  Self-regulatory initiatives such as the "bub-
ble strategy" could become acceptable Federal  regulatory measures
with respect to chemical regulation.
     The present Administration favors the return of responsibili-
ties and regulatory control  to the states, where feasible.   However,
the National Governors'  Association says that  most states are being
forced to cut their budgets  for environmental  programs in proportion
to the cuts in Federal  assistance. (37)
     While general environmental programs may  be suffering reduc-
tions, there is a tremendous growth in the state regulation of
pesticides and toxic substances.
     Congressional intent to boost states' control over chemicals is
illustrated by provisions in RCRA for State control of waste site
selection, and by the proposed Harkin Amendment to the FIFRA, speci-
fically allowing states to set stricter chemical regulations and re-
quirements than those set by the Federal government. (38)  Many
states are passing legislation permitting cleanup of unsafe dump
sites and recovery of costs  from industry.  As of May 1983, 31
states had laws involving cleanup and cost recovery. (39)
     Recognition is growing within regulatory agencies, Congress,
and attentive public interest groups that media-specific regulation,
the primary thrust of regulatory strategy until now, cannot be fully
successful.  Further improvement of environmental quality, if pur-
sued along the lines of concentration on clean air, clean water,
waste management, etc., under separate pieces  of legislation and
varying strategies of achievement, will require extremely detailed
and cumbersome standards and criteria and costly and elaborate
systems of enforcement.  In addition, this strategy has repeatedly

-------
                                  -110-
 resulted In transferring pollutants from one medium to another less
 regulated medium.  Recent discussions among the several interested
 publics have appeared to point toward the development of more flex-
 ible, multi-media, holistic strategies which could allow both indus-
 try and the regulatory agencies more flexibility and discretion in
 achieving performance goals.
      However, reaction to the loss of the legislative veto, already
 discussed, may push the Congress in a contrary direction toward
 reducing the discretion allowed to regulatory agencies.  The ways
 in which this issue is resolved will affect the nature and rigidity
 of future controls over toxic materials.
 5.  The States and Toxic Chemicals
      In April 1983, the President's Private Sector Survey on Cost
 Control (PPSSCC) reported that the Federal government, "could trim
 an estimated $465 million from EPA's budget over the next three
 years by handing over to the states a larger role in environmental
 regulation and reducing Federal  support of state environmental  pro-
 grams."  One of the specific  recommendations was that the Resource
'Conservation and Recovery Act be amended  to simplify EPA's job  of
 issuing permits for treatment of hazardous wastes.  (40J
      State governments have mixed responses to  such proposals at
 a  time  when  state budgets are strained to the limits.   Industry
 also tends to have mixed reactions.   States, competing with each
 other to  attract or hold industry and the employment and taxes
 that it generates, might be less  rigorous than  the  Federal  government
 pollution control.  But for nation-wide companies,  the diversity
 and uncertainty of dealing  with  50 sources of varying  environmental
 regulations  and standards may outweigh any benefits they might
 gain.   Environmentalists  tend to  point to the "administrative jun-
 gle"  and  "public  health disaster"  that they claim has  resulted
 from state responsibility for control  of  the use of pesticides  as
 a  model of what could  be  expected  if the  states  have  primary  res-
 ponsibility  for control  of  toxic  substances.  (41)

-------
                                 -111-
      The  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 left  to
 the  states  the  responsibility for hazardous waste dump siting
 policies,with a  1985 deadline for developing comprehensive  siting
 policies.   In seven years, only 28 states adopted siting  regula-
 tions.  (42) These vary considerably.  Most of the states have
 either  vested final authority for siting decisions in an  existing
 state agency or  established a state-wide siting board with  final
 authority for approving sites proposed by developers.  But  seven
 states  will themselves identify acceptable sites and six  states
 have delegated final decision-making authority to the local com-
 munity  or county in which the site is to be located.  Some  states
 are  offering revenue sharing and other economic incentives  to com-
 munities  that will accept sites.  Other states require developers
 to establish trust funds to cover any future clean-up costs.
 Twenty-two  states have so far been unable to formulate regulations
 or policies to govern future hazardous waste disposal sites.  (43)
      Other  aspects of toxic substances control  are equally  new and
 controversial  areas for state governments, and some states  have
 little  expertise in these areas.   In the last five to eight years
 there has been a decided increase in the involvement of state
 governments, especially state legislators, in various attempts
 to regulate toxic materials within their state.
      State  environmental  legislation, as distinguished from laws
 pertaining  to conservation, state lands, and natural  resources,
 began in  1967, according to a recent study by the National Confer-
 ence  of State Legislators.  (44)'   Between 1967  and 1975,  16 states
 added consolidated pollution control  programs to their Health De-
 partments, and 27 states  created  special  environmental  protection
 agencies or "superagencies" that  combined pollution  control  pro-
 grams and conservation and development programs.   After 1975 when
Oklahoma Was the first state to adopt a comprehensive solid and
 hazardous waste management act, many  states  began to pass  laws re-
 lated to control  of toxic  or hazardous  materials.   The controls
were chiefly of hazardous  wastes  dumping and disposal.

-------
                                 -112-
     Between 1978 and 1983 the number of state laws relating to
various aspects of control of toxic substances increased enor-
mously.  By the spring of 1983, about 500 such provisions were
introduced. There are now at least 100 such pieces of legislation
in 47 states and this number is projected to increase to 155 and
possibly to 190. (See Exhibits 16 and 17.)  According to the Confer-
ence of State Legislatures, the issues of most importance to state
governments at the present are:
     --hazardous waste siting            --toxics in the workplace
     --hazardous waste transport         --groundwater contamination
     --hazardous waste management        --surface water contamination
     —hazardous materials transport     —chemical accidents and
                                           emergencies
     The conference report noted however, that the level  of aware-
ness and understanding of toxic substance issues  is still  low among
state legislators; they are dependent for information on the state
executive branch and generally are unaware of requirements  that
states must implement some Federal laws in this area.   "Legisla-
tures find it difficult to get information  of a technical nature  in
a format they can work with in making policy," the report noted,
and "in many cases, information that would expedite legislative
policymaking is simply not available from any source." (45)
      In the 50 states, approximately 350 legislative committees
possess review authority over various aspects of  Federal  laws per-
taining to toxics.  These responsibilities vary according to state
constitutional and legislative structures and do  not necessarily
match or fit well with Federal provisions and authorities.   There
are 20 joint review or evaluation committees, 90  fiscal  offices,
and a plethora of other legislative committees, commissions, and
support institutions that have some kind of review over state

-------
                                     -113-
                                  EXHIEIT 16*
                       TOTAL TOXIC'S RELATED BILLS PASSED

                                    1960-83
                                    YEAR  Note:  Dips In the line on alternative years
                                               reflect the fact that some State
                                               legislatures are not In session or
                                               have short dedicated sessions during
                                               those years.
                               EXHIBIT 17*
                      TOTALS:  INTRODUCTIONS vs. BILLS
                                 ENACTED  1978-83
                tn
                O
                o
                a

              i-
                                                  ilSS-190
                                  YEAR

                               •*	 INTRO'S

                               -»	ENACT*S
* Source:  R. D.  Speer,  State  Toxic Substances  Legisi ation:  Activities
  and Trends, prepared  for The  National  ConfcVehce  of State Legislatures,
  Denver,  Colorado, and the U.S.  EPA,  Office  of Toxics Integration,
  August  31, 1983, pp.  8, 19.

-------
                              -114-
executive and legislative programs pertaining to toxic
substance control.  Most of these had no responsibility or
authority related to toxic substances until the last few years.
Executive branch  interest in and awareness of the issues began
earlier but there was no  legislative or budgetary mandate for
active programs.  State legislatures, as indicated by the recent
proliferation of bills passed or introduced in recent sessions,
will be more active in toxics control in the future.  But manage-
ment and oversight at the state level is also becoming more
diverse and fragmented, and given the tensions between executive
and legislative actors in many state governments, this is likely
to pose problems in itself for toxic control actions at the state
level.
     The most vigorous legislative action  at the state level is
now  in tort-related law, that is, laws relating to injury or damage
for which a civil action could be brought.  This category includes
labeling, right-to-know, confidential information provisions, and
victim compensation and liability provisions.  Labeling and worker
right-to-know laws have been enacted in a number of states and
the number is expected to increase.   Many require the posting of
a list of substances present at a worksite rather than specific
labeling.  They usually also contain provisions protecting confi-
dential business information.  The overall effect and effective-
ness of such laws is unclear.  The report of the National Confer-
ence of State Legislatures comments  that, "States seem to be con-
ducting a balancing act between protecting the worker and [protect-
ing] business."  (46)
     About half of state liability provisions that have been re-
cently introduced prescribe  penalties  for illegal  waste disposal.
The remainder  are provisions merely recognizing liability for
damage caused by hazardous  materials or wastes.   The Conference
report notes  that, "for the record...they state the obvious:
if you  cause  harmf  you  are  liable."   Victim compensation  and  sta-
tutes of  limitations  relating to  claims  for compensation are,  with

-------
                               -115-
 regard  to toxic substances or wastes, new areas of action for
 states  and  too new for their effects to have been felt.  In the
 future,  they may have significant impacts on interpretation of
 state tort  law because, as noted by the Conference Report--
     "... evidence of exposure requires testimony from scien-
     tific  and technical experts whose methods of determining
     exposure do not necessarily square with the requirements
     of  evidence.  Scientists and technicians...most often
     work within the limits of statistical interpretation
     when providing testimony in a claims case which is often
     viewed by the courts as inadequate for proof."  (47)
     A number of bills require reporting by an employer to appro-
 priate  state agencies.  The Conference report provides no informa-
 tion about what data is to be reported, but notes that a few bills
 provide  for specific information banks such as cancer registries
which are presumably directed at providing information about the
 relationship of the working history of individuals with the inci-
 dence of cancer.
     A few of the toxic-related bills introduced from 1980 to 1983
are appropriations for toxic clean up or for contingency planning
or for special  studies of problems related to toxic substances and
hazardous wastes.
     Recent legislative sessions have also seen the introduction of
bills banning specific chemicals or classes of chemicals from land-
fills or even from hazardous waste disposal  facilities.   These
bills generally respond to a particular incident or public  alarm
and are vigorously resisted by industry lobbyists, but are  expected
to increase.
     Increased  regulatory actions by states  are generating  new
governmental and  industrial  concerns about hindrances to inter-
state commerce  by  prohibiting the movement of hazardous  materials,
especially wastes,  across state or city borders,  and  the lack  of
standardization in regulations  among states.   Other concerns in-
volve the problems  faced by states  in  enforcing regulations  and
in their ability  to finance monitoring  and data  collection  programs,
licensing requirements,  and agency  review  processes.

-------
                                -116-
 6.   Organized   Crime
      There  is  a widespread  belief, and some  evidence,  that organ-
 ized crime  is  deeply  involved  in  the  handling of hazardous and  toxic
 wastes.   Dr. Samuel Epstein, Lester 0. Brown, and Carl Pope,  in
 Hazardous Waste in America, published by  the Sierra Club  in 1982,
 describe  and document the extent  of illegal  dumping of hazardous
 wastes, and comment:
      "Is  organized crime behind the illegal  dumping industry?
      No one knows for sure.  Organized crime has been  closely
      tied to the garbage-hauling  industry, especially  in  the
      Northeast.  It has been further suggested that some
      hazardous  wastes  operations  are syndicate fronts." (48)
      In spite of this  circumspection, Epstein et  al   then quote
 several well-known law enforcement officials who are willing  to say
 flatly that underworld figures have "gained  control over  substantial
 parts of  the hazardous waste disposal industry through the estab-
 lishment  of 'front1 organizations and the almost instantaneous
 replacement of  companies caught illegally dumping with other
 phony operations." (49)  They recount numerous incidents of inves-
 tigations, indictments, and convictions, especially in New Jersey
 and  Pennsylvania.   The authors conclude that many reputable com-
 panies deal with illegal waste handlers by looking the other way.
 They suggest that the reasons are:
     — the lack of adequate disposal  facilities;
     —the lack of adequate state regulation, and the failure of
       states to implement and aggressively enforce such regulations
       as do exist;
     --the jurisdi.ctional  problems between states,  and the lack of
       monitoring  and reporting of industrial wastes leaving
       one state to be illegally dumped in another;
     --the lack of aggressive Federal  enforcement.
     As to the last point,  the Department of Justice brought  over
60 actions against illegal  dumpers between 1979 and late 1980. (50)
The Sierra Club authors predict that,  "the situation will  further
deteriorate over the  next  five years  as  the chemical  industry at-
tempts to dispose  of  not only the  wastes  they now generate but also
the millions of tons  being  stored  until  new disposal  facilities  are
available."  (51)

-------
                                -117-
7.   Litigation
     "There is a trend toward greater rel'iance on the courts to reg-
ulate the chemical  industry, to"act as watchdog on Federal  agencies'
regulatory practices, and to adjudicate disputes.  (52)   Congress has
used language in laws permitting judicial  review of administrative
rulingSo  For example, TSCA provides that within 60 days after pro-
mulgation of a rule, any person may file a petition for judicial
review.
     Increasing litigation lengthens the time before public and pri-
vate decisions can be made final.  There is also a trend toward
increasing involvement of the courts in routine agency  activities,
demonstrated by the following recent examples.  The courts  first
overturned and then sustained a January 1983 OSHA decision  not to
issue an emergency standard reducing workers' exposure  limit to
ethylene oxide, but ordered OSHA to expedite reconsideration of
present standards. (53)  The Supreme Court overturned the OSHA rule
requiring extensive engineering changes in plants manufacturing
benzene. (New rules were proposed in December 1983.) (54)  The U.S.
Court of Appeals overturned the Consumer Product Safety Commission's
ban on the use of urea formaldehyde insulation,, (55)  In 1979, the
court supported the joint CMA and National Resources Defense Council
case forcing EPA to establish a schedule for addressing the Inter-
agency Testing Committee's (ITC)  recommendations for testing. (56)
     There are three types of toxic torts:  workers' compensation,
product liability, and environmental harm (third party  injury
from hazardous substances and hazardous wastes in disposal  sites).
These issues are, however, hard to separate.  Major recent  liabili-
ty suits include:
     —The Johns Manville Corporation, which filed bankruptcy
       rather than face up to $2  billion in private liability
       suits involving asbestos exposure;
     --The Superfund decision to  spend $33 million to buy out
       Times Beach after the city was exposed to dioxin;  (57)
     "Allied Ch§micals'  expenditure of almost $20 million  to
       settle kepone exposure cases out of court and to dis-
       mantle and dispose of the  Hopewell, Virginia, chemical
       plant; (58)

-------
                                -118-
      --Evacuation  of 263  families  from Niagara  Falls'  Love Canal
        after 82 chemical  compounds  were identified  in  the  water.
        Almost $27  million was  appropriated  by municipal, State
        and Federal  agencies  for temporary housing and  cleanup.
        Over 900 notices of claims were filed  against  the local
        government,  the Board of Education,  and  Hooker  Chemical
        Company.  (59)
 8.   The Developing Issues of Liability and  Victim Compensation
      Two recent legal  studies  examining questions of victim com-
 pensation are the  301e (Superfund)  Study Group  and  the Environ-
 mental  Law Institute report.  (60)   Both found inadequacies  in
 present tort law remedies  available to  victims  of hazardous waste
 insults.   They structure  the coming Congressional debate on lia-
 bility  and victim  compensation  according to two future avenues of
 relief:   a no-fault  administrative  fund  and access  to  the State
 courts.
      Several  torts are pending  that may  significantly  alter the
 liabilities  of government  and industry.  One tort involves Hooker
 Chemicals  and  Plastics' accidental  mixture of the fire  retardant
 polybrominated  biphenyl (PBB) with  cattle feed in Michigan  in 1973,
 forcing  the  slaughter of thousands of cattle.   Hooker has tenta-
 tively  settled with  the state of Michigan, agreeing to excavate con-
 taminated  soil,  purify the groundwater, and  guarantee a $2 million
 cleanup  fund.  (61)
     Another victim  compensation suit on behalf of 16,102 Vietnam
 veterans exposed to  dioxin (a contaminant of the defoliant Agent
 Orange)  has  been filed against  several  chemical companies.  Twenty-five
 community wells  in Long Island are now closed due to contamination
 by trichloroethylene, a potential carcinogen,  and more are expected
 to be closed in  the  near future.  A suit is  pending.  Hundreds
 of women suffered toxic shock and some died  following the use of
 tampons made with modified fibers.   Dozens of product liability
 suits are pending.  (62)   Hundreds of thousands  of people in World
War II were exposed to the mineral  asbestos  while  working in ship-
yards.  Many workers have  turned to the courts  and product  liability
 laws  for relief.

-------
                               -119-
     Victim compensation rests upon proof of causation.   However,
definitively linking cause and effect is complicated by  the com-
plex etiology of most chronic diseases, including latency,  mutiple
targets/diseases, interaction of environmental  factors,  estimates
of dose levels, misdiagnosis, individual variability,  and disagree-
ment among experts.   (63)
     TSCA addresses pre-manufacturing review of new chemicals and
regulation of existing chemicals; RCRA  addresses questipns of victim
compensation and final disposal of hazardous substances.  Legis-
lation recently introduced in Congress goes beyond these to address
the health and environmental effects of chemicals and chemical-
containing products during their normal use and market lifetime.
Proposed as an amendment to TSCA, the legislation would  increase the
burden of liability of the manufacturer for adverse health
effects arising anytime during the normal product life
cycle.  It would create direct access to Federal courts for com-
plainants—a Federal cause of action.  This legislation highlights
two interacting trends:  increasing sophistication about exposure
not only from point-source waste deposits but also from nonpoint
release and interaction of chemicals in the built environment,  and
an emphasis on a combination of regulation and increasing access to
litigation to ensure the safety and health of the American public.
     Because of the difficulty of definitively linking cause and
effect, there is a trend in compensation mechanisms to combine
limited compensation with a low threshold of proof.  Whether, how.
and when to compensate people for health damages caused  by exposure
to toxic substances, have raised broad legal and social questions.
These diseases often have multiple causes and long latencies.
It is often impossible to identify a single agent or manufacturer
responsible for exposure leading to the disease.
     Many environmentally related illnesses are clinically indis-
tinguishable from disease of non-environmental  origin or from the
aging process.   The best-studied example, asbestos-induced lung
cancer, has a latency of 15-40 years and is so far indistinguish-

-------
                                -120-
 able from other lung  cancers.   Additionally,  studies  indicate  that
 smoking and asbestos  exposure  combined  have a multiplicative effect
 on the risk of lung cancer death.   In the  same fashion,  certain
 organic phosphate pesticides and  chlorinated  hydrocarbons
 interact synergistically within the  body,  together generating
 ten times the health  risk  they would separately.  The chlorinated
 hydrocarbons interfere with the action  of  cholinesterase in the
 liver, leaving nerve  tissue especially susceptible to damage  from
 the phosphates.   (64)
      There is continuing concern  for and emphasis on the 'popula-
 tion at highest risk.'  This population is the one most  often
 represented in compensation and litigation and is the one  that
 will  drive the future of legislation and regulation.  In
 the future,  liability may  be based on the risk  contributed
 by an industry or product  rather  than on an individual's
 demonstrated symptomatic response to the product.  Under this
 model  of liability for potential  rather than  realized harm, a man-
 ufacturer would,  for example,  be  liable for the claims of all  wo-
 men that had used a product later shown to be a teratogen, not just
 to  the women who  gave birth to  congenitally defective children.
 The reasoning  behind this approach is that many health problems
 such  as  leukemia  or emphysema may not develop until  long after
 the culprit  exposure.   Additionally, two or more factors of risk--
 say occupational  exposure and particular water supply components--
 may together cause illness that would not be caused  by one of the
 factors  in  isolation.   This argument is  being  used by a group of
 citizens  from Woburn,  Massachusetts, who were  exposed to high
 levels of  trichloroethylene (TCE)  and related  known  carcinogens
 in  drinking water.  Most of the 16 children who had  contracted  leu-
 kemia  in Woburn since  1969 lived within  a  ten-block  radius of two
wells.  The citizens of Woburn  have filed  suit, not  only on behalf
of  the afflicted children,  but  for their own  increased risk of
 later  illness precipitated by  this earlier  statistically-measured
exposure to TCE.  (65)

-------
                                -121-
      If  this  risk  recovery approach were to become established,  it
would have  to  be predicated on a universal scale linking overall
risk  associated with a level of exposure to a particular agent.
The technical  and  political near-impossibility of developing  any
sort  of  comprehensive, universal scale, acceptable to all people
and all  interest groups, makes full realization of quantified risk
recovery unlikely.  However, thv> evolution of common law is
likely to reflect  the increasing concern of the public, not only
for physically demonstrated illness, but for mental stress, imposed
risk,  and latent harm.
      The pressure  to place the burden of proof on scientific  analy-
sis of cause  and effect is reflected in a victim compensation  bill
currently before Congress (H.R. 2582).  This bill calls for EPA to
establish a comprehensive "health effects documents" to definitively
link  exposure  and  etiology.
9.  Environmental  Mediation
      Both regulatory decision-making procedures and court litigation
cause  affected parties and institutions to take strongly adversarial
positions and make it difficult to achieve outcomes that are  rela-
tively acceptable, if not satisfactory, to all or most of the  parties
with conflicting interests and values.   These procedures are also
slow and  costly.   The concept of environmental conflict resolution
or environmental  mediation has developed within the last decade as
an alternative to adversarial  procedures and litigation.
     The objective of environmental  mediation is to create an oppor-
tunity for parties in conflict to cooperatively develop through
direct negotiation new alternatives  that can be accepted by  all
parties as meeting their most essential  objectives.   In regulatory
decision-making situations,  the ideal  outcome is to have this ne-
gotiated, mutually agreed upon outcome embodied in  official  rules
or regulations without the necessity for adversarial  proceedings.
When a neutral third  party is  called in  to  assist and  facilitate

-------
                                -122-
 the negotiations,  the te'rm "mediation"  is  used to  describe the
 dispute resolution process.   The term "regulatory  negotiation" is
 used when  a regulatory agency designates an  official  of the agency
 to join in the negotiations  with the  intent  of publishing  the out-
 come as a  proposed rule,  which will then move  through normal  rule-
 making  procedures.  (66)
      Environmental  mediation has been used successfully in many
 disputes,  on a voluntary,  case-by-case  basis.   The Conservation
 Foundation,  for example,  recently  listed more  than 40 cases  in
 which environmental  negotiation or mediation resulted in imple-
 mentable agreements.  (67)  For example, officials  of  Montgomery
 County  (Maryland)  and local  property  owners negotiated, with  the
 assistance of the  Institute  for Environmental  Mediation, an agree-
 ment on siting of  a  solid waste landfill that  was  ratified  by  the
 county  council  in  February 1983.   Massachusetts, Virginia, Wiscon-
 sin,  Montana,  and Alaska have  laws providing for negotiation and
 mediation  in  certain  kinds of  environmental disputes  (68),  and at
 least two  states have  adopted  laws requiring mediation  in the  sit-
 ing  of  hazardous waste dumps.  (69)  There are  organizations offering
 environmental  dispute  resolution assistance in many other states.
 Bills have been introduced in  Congress to establish a national
 regulatory negotiation  council. (70)
      This approach is  likely to become more popular, but it has in-
 herent  limitations.  Parties to an environmental dispute, or parties
 directly affected by  rule-making, may have such large monetary  stakes
 in the outcome or such an inflexible ideological position that  they
 are unwilling  to compromise,  or they may fear that future positions
 in traditional forums will be weakened by an  agreement to negotiate.
There may be too many parties, with divergent or fragmented inter-
ests, to involve in a manageable negotiation.   Some positions may
be inherently non-negotiable.  For example, while negotiation is
faster,  cheaper, and often fairer than the  court system, both the
chemical industry and interest groups  are frequently unwilling to
compromise  on their positions.   As a  result,  the courts will remain
the favored alternative.

-------
                               -123-
10.  International  Pressures
     Proliferation  of hazardous and toxic chemicals  is a global
problem.  The appearance of DDT in Antarctica is an  example of the
necessity for cooperative, multinational  action.  Internal  politi-
cal factors often prevent countries from acting together on these
problems.  But there is growing pressure from environmental inter-
est groups within nations and from international environmental or-
ganizations for cooperative action.  The effectiveness of these
groups in focusing  worldwide public and political  attention on
chemicals in the environment will  increase.
     In 1979, the European Economic Community (EEC)  adopted a directive
(79/83/EEC) to upgrade procedures  for testing, notification, and label-
ing of dangerous substances. (71)   It specifies the  type of data that
must accompany a pre-market notification. (72) Although the directive
itself has no power to delay or deny marketing of a  chemical, EEC mem-
ber nations are required by treaty to pass compatible legislation
(within two years)  to translate international agreement into enforce-
able domestic law.
     Environmental  groups are appearing in many developing and newly
developed nations.   There are also worldwide coalitions of non-
governmental organizations and programs concerned with hazardous
chemical proliferation.  Such international  groups include:
     •  Consumer Interpol of the International Organization of
        Consumer Unions (IOCU):
     t  UNEP's Global Environmental Monitoring System (GEMS);
     •  The newly formed Pesticide Actions Network (PAN) Inter-
        national ;
     •  The International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals
        (IRPTC) is  operated by the United Nations Environment
        Programme (UNEP).  IRPTC had national correspondents in
        68 countries as of January 1980.
     t  An International Occupational Safety and Health Hazard Alert
        System is operated jointly by UNEP and the International
        Labor Organization (ILO).
     t  The ILO also tracks chemical hazards to workers on a regular
        basis.

-------
                               -124-
      •  The  International Agency for Research on  Cancer  (IARC),  an
        independent body under  the World Health Organization,  re-  ,
        views  international data on the risk of cancer from  chemi-
        cals to which humans may be exposed. (73,  74)
      These organizations are concerned with:               :
      -- improving the knowledge base on what constitutes a toxic
        or hazardous chemical,  including systematizing testing and
        regulatory procedures among nations;
      -- improving the monitoring of domestic use  and international
        trade  in these chemicals and international practices and
        trade  in chemical wastes; and
      -- improving the notification among nations when a chemical
        has been banned in one country or tests find that it poses
        adverse effects upon the environmental  or  public health.
     Within Europe an Environmental  Chemicals Documentation and
Information Network (ECDIN) has been set up to  provide reliable
information on environmentally significant chemical products.  It
covers scientific data,  production and trade, health, and regulatory
information.  (75)
     The General  Agreement on  Tariffs  and  Trade  (GATT),  broadly
geared to encourage free and equitable trade among nations,  di-
rectly and significantly affects international  trade and  policy
on toxic substances.   GATT and its  component agreements  (particu-
larly the 1979 Agreement on Technical  Barriers  to  Trade,  also
known as the Standards  Code) deals  with national  non-tariff bar-
riers raised by differing product safety and health standards,
exchange of information  on standards,  international dispute
settlement, international  alignment of national  standards.
It also encourages special  assistance  to developing nations  to
develop national  standards  and practices in  lines  with
GATT. (76)
     On a broader scale UNCTAD (the United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development) has focused on providing developing countries
with easier access to the markets of the developed countries through
reductions in tariffs and nontariff trade  barriers.  The  tradi-
tional UNCTAD view has been that developing  country suppliers are
disproportionately affected because  of their more  limited ability to
comply with health and safety  standards and other nontariff barriers.

-------
                               -125-
     Informal harmonization already marks much of regulation on
environmental and specifically chemical issues.  TSCA and the EEC
Directive share major common features on inventory, notification,
hazard assessment, and information.  More formalized international
harmonization has been discussed for many years, driven by a desire
for:
     •  consistent world-wide protection of health and the
        environment,
     •  elimination of potential  nontariff barriers to trade,
     •  stabilization of the regulatory environment for the
        chemical industry,
     •  reduction in spending on laboratories, testing, and
        regulatory experts now needed to satisfy the many
        different regulatory standards. (77)
Practical limitations on harmonization are set by the self-interests
of nations in protecting their domestic industry through the use of
tariff and nontariff barriers,  by different priorities among na-
tions with extremely different living standards and economic needs
and consequently different levels of acceptable risk, attitudes
towards cost-bearing for this reduction of environmental and health
hazards, access to information by foreign governments, industry,
and public interest groups vs.  protection of proprietary rights.
The conflict betv/eer. supporters of the private right to con-
fidentiality vs. the public right to full  disclosure has been a
continuing one within the U.S.; the same issue on a larger scale
will be no less difficult to settle on an international  level among
nations.

11. U. S. Export Policy and Toxic Chemicals
     Export from t.he United States of hazardous materials that are
banned or restricted in this country is vigorously protested by
international environmental and public health groups and by leading
American environmentalists.  Their ethical position is that the U.S.
as the producing nation has a responsibility to the people of other

-------
                                -126-
nations, particularly those that may lack the expertise, the re-
sources, or the responsive political system to protect the public
health of their own population.  But this is reinforced by percep-
tion of the risk of national embarrassment and increased interna-
tional tension if there is a highly visible public health disaster
that could be exploited by hostile nations or political factions.
Moreover, exported toxic chemicals sometimes come home again in
imported food and consumer goods.
     The United States provides notification about hazardous ex-
ports to the governments of the importing nations under several
Federal statutes, including TSCA,  A much stronger set of controls,
including a procedure that could be used in extreme cases by the
Federal government to prevent the export of hazardous materials,
was instituted by Executive Order 12264, January 15,  1981,  but re-
voked a month later,  when the new Administration began a review of
the issue.   That review has not yet been completed.  (78)
     The OECD is expected to approve an export notification policy
(approved by OECD's Chemicals Group on Oct.  21,  1983) that  calls
for member nations to provide a one-time advisory notice to import-
ing nations about hazardous substances that  are  regulated within
the exporting nation.   The United States is  supporting this OECD
action.  (79)
     Shifts  in location of hazardous chemical production and waste
disposal facilities to developing countries are also contributing
to  increasing international concerns over occupational health dam-
age and general exposure to hazardous chemicals within these
countries.
12.  Right to Know
     The conflict between a company's economic interest in keeping
its product formulas proprietary and the desire of the worker and
public to know the contents and formula of a product they are ex-
posed to has flared into political and legal battles at the com-
munity, State, and Federal levels.  Industry argues the need for

-------
                             .  -127-
trade secrets to maintain a competitive edge;  the public argues
its right to informed choice about lifestyle.
     The 1978 amendments to FIFRA directed EPA to make safety and
health test data available to the public; Monsanto has claimed that
the disclosure demanded by EPA would make nearly $24 million worth
of trade secrets available to competitors, and sued EPA accordingly
in 1979.  In April 1983, the court ruled in Monsanto's favor, and
subsequently EPA instituted a revised registration process for
pesticides.  EPA has appealed the case to the  Supreme Court, which
should rule on it sometime in 1984. (80)
     Trade secrets continue to be vital to industry innovation and
success, due to the fast pace of competition and the weakness of
patent protection once a formula is made public.  However, the last-
ing trend is towards greater public and worker awareness and in-
volvement.
     Recent legislation has favored greater public disclosures,
as in the 1978 amendment to FIFRA, but there has been little im-
plementation of this.  New right-to-know laws  are likely, to sup-
port the  interests of the worker and the community.
     Fourteen states and two cities have passed stringent right-to-
know or labeling laws.  Another 12 states are  considering similar
labeling laws.  (81)
     The  typical severity of state law and differences from  state
to state prompted the chemical industry to support the implementa-
tion of consistent OSHA-developed national standards on labeling.
     On November 25, 1982, the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration promulgated its Hazard Communication Final Rule
(Fed.Reg.48, no.228, 53280-53348).  It provides for the labeling
and provision of a Materials Safety Data Sheet for every hazardous
material used in the workplace, to show the identity and possible
health effects of every hazardous component that comprises at least
1% of the material.   Known carcinogens must be labeled if they com-
prise 0.1%, and any ingredient comprising less than 1% must be

-------
                               -128-
 labeled  if  it could be hazardous at that concentration, or  if  there
 is  evidence  that permissible exposure limits might be exceeded  in
 the workplace.  The rule applies only to manufacturing, not to  all
 workers  who  might be exposed to chemicals.
     The manufacturer or importer may, to protect his economic
 well-being,  use his own discretion in withholding the identity
 (although not the effects) of a chemical; there is provision for
 challenging  this action..  The rule provides an advisory (not manda-
 tory)  list of sources of data.  But the manufacturer or importer
 may stipulate that no information is available about health effects.
     The rule is less stringent than that proposed by the previous
 Administration in 1981. (82)  The OSHA rule specifically preempts
 state  laws,  including those which are more stringent than the
 Federal  rule.  It is almost certain that the rule will be chal-
 lenged in court on the grounds that the OSHA Act of 1970 was not
 intended to  mean that state laws more stringent than Federal stan-
 dards  could  be construed as in conflict with the Federal standard. (83)
     The new OSHA rule and a series of other rpcent OSHA and EPA
 rules  "ultimately should lessen employee and public exposure to
 dangerous chemicals," according to Timothy Atkeson of Steptoe &
 Johnson, Washington attorneys.  "In the short run, though, they
 will substantially increase the product liability exposure of
 manufacturers and importers by providing potential plaintiffs
 with data on exposure, causation,  injury, and possible negligence
 of  management." (84)  The EPA rules are those promulgated under TSCA,
 Sec. 8.
     A coalition of environmental  groups led by the Natural  Resources
 Defense  Council  (NRDC) successfully negotiated the release of in-
 dustry health and safety test data on 11 pesticides submitted under
 FIFRA requirements.   But the release of the sensitive industry
 data, intended by NRDC for review  by independent scientists, hinged
 on  NRDC's guarantee to severely limit distribution of the data. (85)
     The European Economic Community (EEC)  in 1983 also  adopted new
 labeling standards,  increasing the disclosure required in European
markets.  (86)

-------
                               -129-.
     The potential  impact of accidental  or intentional  release
of a chemical formula is especially great from foreign  countries.
In May 1982 the formula for Monsanto's herbicide Roundup, the best-
selling herbicide around the globe, was  accidentally released;
Roundup provided $450 million and 40% of profits on sales, mostly
from foreign countries. (87)  Although Monsanto's successful  suit
required EPA to monitor U.S. patents for products based on the
accidentally released Roundup information, the, possible loss  of
revenue to foreign  producers cannot be documented.
13.  Computers and  Telecommunications
     A new source of communications and  information available to
the public appeared with the introduction and mass  distribution of
the microcomputer and with improvements  in telecommunications.
     Telematics technologies will have a significant influence on
the right-to-know debate, weighting it in favor of enhanced public
access and activism.  While telematics does not necessarily open
up access to proprietary industry information, it will  provide
generic changes in  the management and availability  of data.  Sophis-
ticated data base management, national networking,  computerized
recordkeepinq and data processing, and the pervasiveness of computer
skills and access will permit wide-ranging data to be compiled and
correlated in new ways.  Data that has previously been available
yet isolated will be tapped for new knowledge about linkages  with
occupational and public health, environmental transport and impacts,
and systems models.
     In addition, the mass availability of cheap electronic systems
is personalizing environmental, regulatory, and economic analysis
and modeling.  Vast amounts of data can  be manipulated  by indi-
viduals, organizations, and governments.  As a result,  governmental
decisionmaking  is  increasingly complex, assessing  the  short- and
long-term implications of their decisions on numerous factors.  The
public's ability to followed participate in this  process can be
expected to increase in the future.

-------
                                -130-
      Computerized  data  base management  has  enabled  the  Audubon  So-
 ciety to  organize  an  extensive,  responsive  national  network  of
 citizen activists.  Over  50,000  of  the  500,000 members  of  the
 Audubon Society  are listed in a  data  base according  to  congres-
 sional districts.  When relevant legislation conies  up,  activists
 in  affected or key districts are automatically and  quickly
 mobilized. (88)
 14.   The  Media as  Catalyst
      The  post-industrial  society is characterized by an explosion
 of  environmental and  health-related information available to the
 public, through  print,  radio, and television.  The media has been
 the major factor in public awareness  and perceptions of chemicals
 in  the environment, and in identifying emerging policy  issues and
 "mustering the political  and bureaucratic forces necessary to ob-
 tain 'legislation,  appropriations, regulations, and new or expanded
 programs  to address these problems."  (89) Many Federal, State, and
 local initiatives  are directly attributed to media coverage of en-
 vironmental concerns and  events.
      But  media coverage of chemical-related news is often unbal-
 anced, capitalizing on  the sensational aspects of health and en-
 vironmental problems.   Since Love Canal in 1978, the press has
 regularly provided the  public with vivid, but often distorted,
 accounts  of hazardous waste mismanagement.
      According to  the 1979 Directory  of Environmental Periodicals,
 Vance Bibliographies, there then were 413 periodicals covering
 aspects of environmental pollution and control.   This included 46
 abstracting and  indexing services, 195 journals,  and 172 newsletters
 and bulletins. (90)

 C.  SOURCES OF INCREASED ALARM OVER TOXIC SUBSTANCES, 1984-1995
     Sometime in  the  future,  probably within the  next five years,
 there are  likely  to be strong  public and political  demands for in-
creased attention to  existing  chemicals  --  those  that have been

-------
                                -131-
 produced and used in great volume for many years.   Available infor-
 mation about these chemicals, their past and present producers,
 where they were-produced, their health and environmental  effects,
 and their present location, is sparse and dispersed.  Some of the
 ways irt which these demands may suddenly arise are suggested in
 this section.  We have already identified long-range societal
 trends and shorter term political factors that point to sustained
 and increasing public support for environmental  protection, and
 much sharper focus on direct health effects of toxic substances,
 and an internationalization of demands for their control.
      Active  demand for further governmental  action  to  control  toxic
 substances  is likely  to be  episodic,  and  is  most likely to arise as
 a  result  of  specific  highly publicized incidents.   For example,
 three likely sources  of such  acute  alarms  are  (a) the  discovery  of
 groundwater  contamination with toxic  chemicals threatening drinking
 water supplies,  (b) one or  more disasters  related to transport of
 chemicals, and  (c)  discovery  of widespread contamination from old,
 forgotten  toxic wastes.  The  latter may sooner or later come  about
 through the  sudden release of  toxic materials as a result of some
 natural disaster, or  a  technological  failure such as the breaking
 of a  dam  containing polluted  sediments.   In  each of  these
 categories,  the source  of pollutants might well  not be the chemical
 industries and might  be many decades old, but the political effects
 would nevertheless severely impact  the chemical  industries because
 the public tends not  to make such fine distinctions in demanding
 action.
 1.  Groundwater Contamination: An Inevitable Political  Issue
     Groundwater contamination is already becoming a matter of ac-
 tive public concern.
     Well educated, science-oriented professionals  -- scientists,
 engineers, teachers, editors, etc., are already highly  conscious
 of the problem of groundwater contamination, as indicated  by recent
studies done  for EPA.  (91)     In a series  of  workshops  and  surveys

-------
                                -132-
of participants in national  meetings of several  major professional
societies, groundwater contamination was consistently picked as one
of the half-dozen most important environmental  problems of the next
one to two decades.  This concern will  tend to  become more wide-
spread as it is reflected in the "popular science" and environmen-
tal literature.
     Inevitably, further discoveries of contaminated groundwater
resulting in the closing of  wells and affecting the drinking water
of large numbers of people,  will occur and will  result in a sudden
focusing of attention, alarm, and demands for political action.
The 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Toxic Sub.-
stances Control Act thus could be merely the beginning of a series
of attempts to protect groundwater.
     About 95% of fresh water in the United States is stored in
aquifers, with rivers, lakes, and other surface waters accounting
for only about 4%.  Between  40% and  50% of the  population and 747.
of U.S. cities depend on groundwater as a primary source of drink-
ing water. (92)  Western irrigation  and livestock watering, which
also require high quality water, also depend largely on groundwater.
(See Exhibit 18.)
                           EXHIBIT 18

                        USE  OF  GROUNDWATER
                                      1950
 1980
          Total use of groundwater   34 bgd*
          Public supplies            12%
          Proportion of irrigation   62%
          Proportion of industry use 18%
          Proportion of rural
            drinking water            8%
88.5 b.gd
13%
68%
14%

 5%
          Source: U.S. EPA, Proposed Ground Water Protection
          Strategy, Office of Drinking Water, 1980; unpub-
          lished data from U.S.G.S. Water Information Service
          reported in Veronica I. Pye,  Groundwater Contamin-
          ation in the United States," see footnote 95.
          *bi"l1ion gallons per day.

-------
                                -133-
     Contamination of groundwater does not necessarily or even
 primarily result from industrial waste.  Municipal landfills,
 sewage,  leaching from mining activities, agricultural runoff and
 irrigation water, animal wastes from feed lots, and highway runoff
 are major sources.  Natural contamination -- leaching of radio-
 active materials and naturally occurring chemicals from the soil,
 and intrusion of seawater as a result of aquifer depletion -- is
 also important.
     In  1980, EPA estimated that between 0.1% and 1.4% of aquifers
 were contaminated by industrial impoundments or landfills.  (93)
 Lehr estimates as a worst case that such pollution affects between
 0.2% and 2.0% of major groundwater deposits.  (94)    But these
 estimates are unrealistic.   They are rvow recognized as far too low.
 They were based in part on regional  assessments commissioned by
 EPA in the 1970's.   Three of the eight assessments commissioned
were never completed.   At the time the regional assessments were
done,  sampling for organic chemicals was rarely undertaken, and
 pollution from natural  causes and from agricultural  practices was
considered to be the major concern.  (95)    Aquifer contamination
 is difficult to detect and trace because of the long lag time
between occurrence and detection, which usually comes only as
pollutants show up in  tests of wells,  and because the dynamics of
underground flow of water and transport of pollutants is very
poorly understood.   The assessments, therefore, almost certainly
grossly understated the problems.
     There has still  been no comprehensive national  survey of ground-
water.   EPA under the  Safe Drinking Water Act requires all states to
do an  aquifer and injection well  identification program, and some
states have inventoried known cases  of groundwater contamination.
These  inventory programs were not complete as of 1983; what data
 is available is being  collected by the Environmental  Assessment
Council  of The Academy of Natural  Sciences and is reported in a
paper  prepared for The National Science Foundation in August 1983,
by Veronica  Pye.  (96)   See  Exhibit 19.

-------
                                             EXHIBIT  19

                         REPORTED  INCIDENTS OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
% of
total water
use from
State cjroundwater
Arizona
Connecticut
Florida
Idaho

Illinois
Nebraska
Mew Jersey
Mew Mexico
South Carolina
61%
8.2%
18%
31%

801
10
68%
60%
92%
23%
No. of
reported
incidents
23
64
92
29

58
35
379
105
89
% of incidents Mo. and percent
threatening incidents
drinking water traced to Major source of
supplies industry waste pollutants
100%
59%
63%
97%

76%
34%
50%
83%
74%
7
28
32
7

12
0
152
0
28
30%
44%
35%
24%

21%
0%
40%
0%
31%
Human/animal wastes, landfills
Industrial wastes, petroleum
products
Saltwater intrusion, agricul-
ture return, industrial waste
Human/aninal wastes, industrial
wastes
Human/animal wastes, landfills
Irrigation, agriculture
Industrial wastes, petroleum
products
Oil field brines (41%), human/
animal wastes
Petroleum products, industrial
wastes
As reviewed by  Environmental  Assessment Council,  reported  in Veronica I. Pye, "Groundwater Contamination
in the United States,"  Workshop  on  Groundwater Resources and Contamination in the United States,
Summary and Papers,  national  Science Foundation PRA Report 83-12, August 1983, Washington, D.C.,
March 14-15, 1983, pp.  36-41.
                                                                                                              GO
                                                                                                              -P.
                                                                                                              I

-------
                                 -135-
      Human health can be affected by consumption of contaminated
 water or by consumption of fresh food irrigated by or processed
 with it.  If the concentration of pollutants is high, skin and re-
 spiratory problems can result from showering or bathing.   Accord-
 ing to the Centers for Disease Control,  reporting of disease due
 to water pollutants is poor and probably reflects only a  fraction
 of cases.  (97)
      The EPA laboratory in Cincinnati has information on  reported
 outbreaks of disease attributable to groundwater. (98)  Between
 1959 and 1980, 303 cases of illness were attributed to contami-
 nation with copper, selenium, fluoride,  nitrate, arsenic, and
 sodium hydroxide, and 52 cases of illness (in six "outbreaks")
 due to toxic organic chemicals.  These reported incidents do not
 include illnesses attributed to pathogens (bacteria, viruses,
 protozoa, worms, fungi) in groundwater,  of which there were 31,425
 cases, in 158 distinct outbreaks, from 1945 to 1980.  Incidents
 suggestive of chronic public health effects due to contaminated
 groundwater have been cited for cancer,  malformations, miscarriage,
 central  nervous system disorders, and cardiovascular disease, but
 there are few controlled epidemiological  investigations to confirm
 these reports.  (99)
      Recent authoritative assessments generally conclude  that seri-
 ously degraded groundwater probably constitutes only a minor frac-
 tion of the total  national  groundwater supply.  (100)  But  "of the
 33 toxic organic chemicals  most frequently found in  groundwater,
 31  have  been reviewed for carcinogenicity.   Two were found to be
 human carcinogens,  10 are confirmed animal  carcinogens, but 15 have
yet to be tested."  (101)  Carcinogenic and mutagenic effects are  usually
 delayed  and would  probably  not  be traced  to  a  specific environmental
 effect.   But public  concern about the relationship between environ-
 mental  chemicals and such health  effects  is  increasing, so that
 identification  of  toxic  chemicals  in  water supplies  will  attract
 immediate attention  and  alarm.

-------
                                -136-
 2.   Transport of Toxi c Chemicals
      Transport  accidents  that  release toxic materials  into  the
 environment  pose both acute dangers to public safety and health
 and  long-term detrimental effects on surface and groundwater and
 ecological systems.  (102) They also can force the evacuation of large
 numbers  of people and impose heavy costs on local government.
 They have been  of growing concern since the late 1960's.
      The chemical manufacturers cooperatively established,  in 1971,
 an organization called CHEMTREC, to respond to emergencies  by pro-
 viding information on chemicals released accidentally and by con-
 tacting  the  shipper, who is responsible for advising local  author-
 ities on how to handle the problem.  CIOTRCC  now has information
 on the chemical nature and characteristics of 60,000 commercial
 chemicals. (103)
     The  U.S. Department of Transportation has been collecting data
 on transport accidents involving hazardous materials since  1971.
 Hazardous materials include toxic, flammable, reactive, and cor-
 rosive materials, and the data provided in Exhibit 20 does  not dis-
 tinguish between these categories.   A partial  list of accidents
 involving toxic chemicals, which is merely illustrative and in no
vjay comprehensive,  is provided in Exhibit 21.  Both exhibits indi-
 cate deaths, injuries, and in some cases evacuations resulting from
 the accidents.   But toxic spills  from accidents  may also have long-
 range effects on human health through oral,  dermal, and inhalation
exposure and by contaminating surface water,  groundwater, soil,
crops, livestock, and wildlife.  It is,  however,  likely to be
incidents with  multiple  acute effects that provoke strong public
and political reactions.
     On the same day, February 26,  1978,  vaporizing chlorine gas
from a train derailment  in Florida  killed  eight  people and hos-
pitalized 67; and an  explosion of liquid propane  gas being unloaded
from a derailed  railroad  tank  car in  Tennessee  killed 9 and injured
51.   Even accidents  that  cause no acute  injuries  can be significant.

-------
            EXHIBIT 20




INCIDENTS BY MODE AND REPORTING YEAR
MVK 1971
AIR 4
titt(H) 1.562
HVlf(P) 224
RAILNVY 343
WtfER 11
FRT FWCR 0
OTHER 121
TOTAL 2.265
1972
33
3.558
342
333
9
0
53
4.328
1973
49
5.048 7
419
409
12
0
66
6,003 8
1974
157
.251
361
616
26
2
15
.428
1975
152
8,988
903
676
32
6
12
10.769
1976 1977
90 130
10.223 13.000
549 1.250
982 1,500
13 50
11 20
21 0
11,889 15.950
1978
231
1979
284
15,983 15,355
565
1.191 1
47
5
0
18.022 17
623
.215
34
2
11
.524
1980
233
14,042
442
1,327
42
1
28
16,115
1981
160
7,441
263
1,131
7
3
58
9.063
1982
97
5,274
321
830
9
6
3
6,540
TOTAL
1.6)0
107.725
6,262
10,553
292
56
388
126,896
DEATHS W MXE AM) REKKTIM3 YEAR
MI£ 1971
AIR 0
KAY(H) 18
ttW(P) 5
RAILWAY 0
WATER 0
FRT FWCR 0
CHHER 0
TOTAL 23
1972
0
6
6
0
0
0
0
12
1973
0
11
7
3
0
0
0
21
1974
4
14
4
10
0
0
0
32
1975
0
7
20
0
0
0
0
27
1976 1977
0 0
12 14
4 17
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
18 32
1978
0
14
6
26
0
0
0
46
1979
0
12
6
0
0
0
0
18
1980
0
13
4
2
0
0
0
19
1981
0
24
3
0
0
0
0
27
1982
0
11
1
0
0
0
0
12
IKJLRIE3 BY MTE AM) REfCRTINQ YEAR

KTB 1971

AIR 0
Htt(H) 122
Hff(P) 60
RAILWAY 21
VATQI ^g
FRT FWCR 0
OtHKA 2
TOTAL 253 "

£EE 1971
IR °
IVY(H) 3.118.508 3.
Sv*(P) 1,661,475 2.
kAJLWAX 1.491.745 1.
IW.TER 201.052 i.
TCT FWCR 0
TIMER 136,005
•IDEAL 6,608,785 9.

1972

0
192
49
53
0
0
0
294

1971
2,853
587.379 2
701,368 1
549,355 3
252,096
0
223^925
316,976 7
Note: HWY(H) =



1873

6
297
38
152
3
0
13
509

1973
5,104 4,511
.604.163 3,849
.713.518 924
,021,685 11,965
8.009 20
0
14,439 13
.366.913 21,284
Highway (For
source: '

1974

5
243
38
596
17
4
0
903

l?74
.708
,176 3,
.980 2,
.143 1,
.117-
0
.035
.159 7,
Hire)

1975

4
395
92
96
2
15
51
655
DAMAGES
1975
9,159
028,405 3
574,211 2
481.995 2
6.331
3.345
182
103,628 7

1976 1977

4 9
568 447
49 60
198 233
1 0
0 0
0 0
820 749
BY MIX AM) REKKTIK)
1976 1977
20.512 28,686
,617,548 4.272,106
,057,017 4,356,545
.294,633 7.815,243
5,270 18,258
405 351
3,788 9,700
.999,173 16,500,889

1978

43
536
58
482
10
1
0
1.130
YEAR (IN DOLLARS)

1979

13
608
89
228
1
0
2
941

1978 1979
6.834 30
7,440,533 5,372
3,819.373 3.552
6.848,364 5.781
17,912 30
160
0 5
18,133,176 14,772
, HWY(P) ° Highway (Private), FRT FRWDR
nformation Systems, Materials
Transportation
,312
,736 4,
.533 2,
.500 2.
.364
0
,100
,545 10,

1980

8
425
53
129
1
1
2
619

1980
12,486 .
343,739 9,
979,889 3,
834,030 2,
507,427
100
29,365
707,036 15,

1981

7
368
29
221
0
0
18
643

198L
6,660
656,923
016,558
652,827
53,045
6,500
69,108
461,621

1982

0
76
17
36
1
0
0
130

1982
28,001 4,
8,640,420 59,
2,719,137 32,
4,068,195 51,
30,000 2,
35
200
15,485,988 150,
TOTAL
4
156 1
83 1
44
0
0
0
287
CO
i
TOTAL

99
4,277
632
2,445
84
21
88
7.646

TOTAL
662,315
531,636
076.604
804,715
149.881
10,896
504,847
740,894
= Freight Forwarder
Bureau,






-------
                                                                       EXHIBIT  21
                                                  ACCIDENTS INVOLVING TOXIC  CHEMICALS:  REPRESENTATIVE INCIDENTS
February 4. 1973.  Train derailment near Woodland Park, Mich.
Leakage from tank car  carrying  ethylene oxide.  Other tanks
carrying a variety of  intermediate chemicals were undamaged.
19 evacuated.                 ChemWeek. Feb. 15. 1978.

February 26, 1978.  Train derailment near Youngstown, Fla.,
because of broken rail.   Chlorine gas vaporized, 1:30 a.m.
8 killed. 67 hospitalized, 2,500 evacuated for two days.
                              New York Times, Feb. 27, 1978. p. 78.

February 26, 1978.  Derailed tank cars of liquid propane gas,
being unloaded  near Uaverly, Tenn.. exploded.  A second 20,000-gal.
car was unloaded successfully.
9 dead, 51 injured, 14 buildings destroyed, 1,500 evacuated.
                              New York Times, Feb. 27, 1933.

December 15, 1978.  Tanker semitrailer struck by locomotive at
grade crossing  near Boute, La.   Tanker contained 7,500 gal. of
liquified anhydrous ammonia.  Estimated more than 13 tons
vaporized.
3 killed by inhalation.       C4EN. June 23, 1980. pp. 46-49.

Hay 8, 1979.  Train derailment near Crestvlew, Fla.  Propulsive
venting and fire involving anhydrous ammonia, acetone, methanol,
chlorine, phenol, carbon tetrachloride, sulfur, urea.
1 injured.                    C4EN. June 23. 1979, pp. 46-49.

October 29, 1979.  Bottom fell  from truck on  Interstate 80 near
Sacramento, Cal.  Cargo of unnamed hazardous chemical spillec.
42.000 evacuated.             Washington Star, Oct. 29, 1979.

November 8, 1979.  Train derailment near Inwood,  Ind.  Eight
breached tank cars, containing acetic anhydride, butyl methacrylate,
ethyl chloride, ethylene oxide, isobutyl alcohol, methacrylic acid,
propylene.  naphtha, propylene oxide, sodium hydroxide, vinyl
chloride.   "Many" complaints of respiratory effects and nausea,
subsurface  ground contamination.
                              C&EN. June 23,  1980, pp. 46-49.

November  11,  1979.   106-car train derailment near Mississauga,
Ontario.   11  tank cars carrying liquid propane exploded, chlorine
gas  leaked; other  tank cars carrying caustic  soda, styrene,  toluene
were not damaged.
218.000 evacuated.            Newsweek, Nov.  26,  1979, p. 70,
                                and Nov. 24,  1980, pp. 20-23.

November  12,  1979.   Train tank car derailment  near Holland,  Mich.
No  leak of  contents,  hydrogen fluoride.
 1.000 evacuated as  precaution.
                     *        C4EH. Nov. 19,  1979, p. d.
April 5. 1980.   Tank car  containing  13,500 gal. phosphorus
trichloride struck by locomotive  in  switching yard, Somerville,
Mass.  Fumes.
11 hospitalized, 422 treated  and  released. 7,000 evacuated,
8 square blocks of buildings  closed.
                             New  York  Times. Apr. 5, 1930.

November 6, 1981.   Tanker truck leaked at truck stop on Interstate 5
near Castaic, Cal.  2,000 gal. of propylene dichloride spilled.
8 hospitalized.              New  York  Times. Nov. 6. 1331.

February 3, 1982.   Truck  hit  median  strip near Strouds&urg, Penn.
12 tons hydrogen chloride vaporized.
1,200 evacuated in 2 sq.  mi.  radius.
                             New  York  Times. Feb. 4. 1332.

August 5. 1932.  Tank truck split, reason unknown, on Pennsylvania
Turnpike near Norristown. Penn.   5.000 gal. of two chemicals used in
plastics manufacture spilled, resulting in release of hydrochloric
acid.
1,500 evacuated.             New  York  Times. Aug. 5, 1982.

August 19, 1982.  Truck damaged by pre-existing corrosion, spilled
5,000 gal. of hydrochloric acid on Jersey Turnpike near Elizabeth.
32 overcome by fumes, 20  treated, 5  hospitalized.
                             New  York  Times, Aug. 19, 1932.

September 30, 1932.  Derailment of 43  chemical tank cars near
Livingston, La.  Hydrogen chloride,  sodium, vinyl chloride.  Fire
and explosion.
3,300 evacuated, ground and water contamination over vni. radius.
                             New  York  Times. Sept. 30, 1982.

January 12, 1983.   Tank truck collided with disabled tractor-trailer
on 1-81 near Watertown, N.J.. spilling 3,700 gal. of toluene
di-isocynate.
3 treated, 200 evacuated  from homes, 300 from hotels, closure for
one day of two shopping plazas, school, rehabilitation center.
                             New  York  Times. Jan. 12. 1933. p. 33.

April 3, 1983.   Ruptured  railroad tankers near downtown Denver.
Spill of 18,000 gal. nitric acid.
5,000 evacuated for 8 hours.
                             Washington Post, Apr. 4, 1933.
OJ
CO
 l

-------
                               -139-
 In January 1983 a truck collision in Watertown, New Jersey,
 spilled 3700 gallons of toluene diisocyanate; only three people
 were treated for minor reactions, but 200 were evacuated from nearby
 homes, 300 were evacuated from two hotels, and two shopping plazas,
 a school, and a rehabilitation center were closed for two days.
     In 1979 there were eight times as many toxic chemical trans-
 port accidents as in 1971, eight years earlier.  During this eight
 years, CHEMTREC responded to 16,000 emergency calls,  of which
 13,500 involved transport accidents,  85% of which were rail or
 truck accidents. (104)  The eight-fold increase is attributed to
 better reporting, to an QQ% increase in shipments by volume, and
 possibly to further deterioration in railroad equipment and road-
 beds.  In 1979 there were 17,524 "unintended releases of materials,"
 about 10% of which were extremely hazardous. (105) Two years ear-
 lier, in 1977, the Department of Transportation had estimated that
 one of every 23 railroad shipments contained hazardous material,
 and one of every ten truck shipments.  Some reports now say that up
 to 15% of trucks on highways carry hazardous materials. (106)  The
 majority" of these shipments, however, involve petroleum rather than
 other toxic chemicals.
     The number of hazardous transport accidents has declined
 yearly from 1980 to 1982, presumably because the economic reces-
 sion reduced the volume of shipments.
     In addition to CHEMTREC, which is run by the Chemical Manufac-
 turers Association  (and which will not give advice to local emer-
 gency teams on site, but will put them in touch with industry
 experts),  there are at least six chemical industry mutual assis-
 tance organizations like CHLOREP (Chlorine Emergency Plan)*  These
 are organized around specific products or classes of products,,
 When there is a transportation (or other) emergency involving these
products, the nearest company belonging to the mutual  assistance
organization responds by sending a disaster management team to  the
spot. (107)  Another group,  the National  Response Center,  is funded
by EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard and sends experts to the accident
scene if needed. (108)

-------
                                -140-
 3.   Widespread  Contamination from Disruption of Old Repositories
     of  Toxics
      The  recent incidents at Love Canal and Times Beach are undoubt-
 edly going  to be followed by similar incidents that gain nation-
 wide publicity.  Both of these incidents were fairly localized and
 the  risks were  contained.  However, there are thousands of toxic
 waste depositories that could be disrupted by the effects of human
 engineering or  natural disasters, and their contents widely dis-
 persed  by flood waters or other natural forces.  The same is, of
 course, true of many small facilities actively processing or using
 toxic chemicals.  Such occurrences have probably happened in the
 past without the toxic contaminants being discovered, identified,
 or publicized, but they may not escape notice in the future.
     Toxic substances stored in the environment and sub.iect to
 inadvertent release need not be the products of 20th Century
 chemical industries.   The second half of the 19th Century was the
 period  in which America became industrialized,  and 19th Century
 manufacturing made plentiful  use of arsenic, mercury, lead, cyanide,
 arrj other toxic materials that are enduring and do not necessarily
 lose their toxicity over time.   Waste products  from this widely
 dispersed, small" to medium-scale manufacturing  were routinely
 heaped on site, poured into nearby water bodies (flowing water
was assumed to cleanse itself quickly), or dumped into ravines or
 on unused land,   (109) From time to time these old wastes come to
 light. A recent example occurred in North  Woburn,  Massachusetts,
where over 100 years  ago Merrimack Chemical  Company began making
 chemicals for the textile industry.    flerrimack  expanded to
become one of the largest producers of arsenic-based pesticides.
        In the summer of 1979,  officials learned  that there
     was an open pit, a  dry  lagoon,  covering about an  acre  of
     land in which  arsenic  was  piled in caked white powder
     several feet thick.   So  concentrated  were  the arsenic,
     lead, and other  chemicals  that a  mere 45 oounds  of the
     soil  would (contain)  enough  to administer  a  lethal
     dosage to  100  adults	   To  compound the  problem the

-------
                                -141-
     arsenic has been scattered widely by winds and rain
     and has contaminated a river watershed known as the
     Aberjona, which courses through Winchester on its way
     to the Atlantic Ocean.  Nearby Mystic Lake may also be
     endangered. (110)
     On February 21, 1981, the Boston Globe reported that the Na-
tional Centers for Disease Control were examining infants in Hudson,
New Hampshire, who had been exposed to high levels of arsenic
found in at least 63 wells in the community.   Nine other New
Hampshire communities, and a few in Massachusetts, were also
found to have high concentrations of arsenic  (in concentrations of
over 0.05 will igro.u.s per  litor).  According to the [i_U)bc, tiic EPA
had launched an investigation to "determine whether the arsenic
is a natural component of the water or represents man-made pollu-
tion."  Although the newspaper did not mention it, and EPA may not
yet have realized it, it is quite possible that the arsenic in
the New England wells is a residue from 19th  Century industries.
     Old and more recent accumulations of persistent toxic chemi-
cals could thus be easily dispersed by the action of earthquakes,
subsidence,  storm surges, and floods,  and thereby contaminate
crop lands,  potable water supplies, groundwater,  and residential
communities.  Of particular concern is the accumulation of per-
sistent toxic materials  in sedimentary deposits in water bodies
and behind dams.   A literature search  reveals  that there is
almost no systematic information or research  on the chemical  nature
of sediments, which are  almost certainly the  current repository of
two centuries of industrial  by-products predating modern watc*r
pollution controls.  (Ill)

-------
                               -142-
Regular dredginc and deposit of spoils on land is subject to some
environmental controls, although it is not certain that the chemical
contents of the deposits are generally anticipated or investigated.
But the failure of hazardous dams or their emergency repair can re-
lease these wastes of twenty decades to be spread by flood waters
over residential areas and farm lands and into ground and surface
waters.
    The Army Corps of Engineers, beginning in 1978, inspected 8,778
dams under Presidential order, following several  disastrous dam
failures the preceding year.  Of these, 2,918 were judged unsafe
and 132 required emergency repairs. (112)  Over 1,582 of the dams
inspected were built before 1900; these could hold polluted sedi-
ments from both 19th Century manufacturing and 20th Century chemi-
cal processing.   Of these, 20% were unsafe.    Many are owned
by private companies, individuals,  or small  communities that cannot
afford the high costs of repair or dismantling.   The states are
responsible for decisions about what must be done, but little
action has been taken.  (113)
4.  Acid Precipitation
     A pervasive and important environmental  issue relevant to
toxic substances is acid  precipitation -- acid rain,  fog,  and   *
snow.   Acid rain has a  direct effect on the  release and  transport
of toxic substances, primarily heavy metals,  altering  the  natural
process of mineral  leaching in soil.   Experts are  divided  as  to the
relative contributions  of acid rain,  changing land use patterns,
anthropogenic  release,  vegetative  progression, and variations in
soil  composition to the leaching  of metals from the soil.  (114)
Some recent statements  by EPA scientists  indicate  that "proven
damages" now amount to  "only tens  of millions" of  dollars  whereas
control strategies  could  cost tens  of billions.  (115)   Other ex-
perts think the damage  is much higher.   An August  1983 article  in
Science argued that local geological conditions may often  dominate
leaching, especially where the soil is naturally  quite acidic,  as
in humus-rich soils. (116)

-------
                               -143-
     There is consensus, however, that for a complex combination of
reasons, including the generation of sulfur dioxide by fossil fuel
combustion, that the acidity of rain and surface water is increasing.
     In addition to its broad effects on forests, buildings, and
aquatic life, acid rain has specific effects on the leaching of
toxic metals.  This leaching of heavy metals, including aluminum,
lead,  mercury, nickel, zinc, cadmium, and manganese, has been linked
to the death of plants, fish, and both aquatic and soil-based micro-
organisms. (117)  These heavy metals are normally present in the soil
primarily in nontoxic form, bound to insoluble organic complexes. (118)
With the increase in soil acidity due to acid rain, however, and de-
pending on the local composition of the soil, heavy metals are freed
from these complexes into soluble, and toxic, form.
     The most common toxic metal, and the most-studied one, is
aluminum.  Released and washed into the watershed by acid conditions,
aluminum is deposited on the gills of fish as aluminum hydroxide,
interfering with the uptake of oxygen and killing the fish.  The
dominant cause of death of fish in acid rain affected lakes is as-
phyxiation.
     Aluminum is also toxic to plant life, damaging the roots and
interfering with the uptake of liquids by the plant.  This paves
the way for invasion by bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other pathogens.
The plant is finally killed by a combination  of starvation, disease,
and poisoning.
     Aluminum and the heavy metals also damage soil microorganisms
which decompose vegetation and recycle plant nutrients.  As a result
of acid rain, these microorganisms start to generate their own acids,
adding to the acid burden on the soil.  (119)
     As yet scientifically unsubstantiated is the potential of acid
rain to directly affect human health, primarily by contaminating
drinking water through the leaching of metals into water supplies
and in piping.  Another unquantified threat is the concentration of
heavy metals, especially mercury, through the food chain.  (120)

-------
                               -144-
      Acid  rain will exacerbate  the chronic problem of pollution from
 stormwater runoff,  the major non-point source of water pollution  in
 urban areas.  Stormwater  runoff pollution comes from several sources,
 primarily,      :
      t  runoff from roadways and property in the city,
         discharged  directly into local waterways,
      •  overburdening of  the sewer systems, causing
         a  sewer overflow  into local streams.
 The primary pollutants picked up and carried by urban stormwater
 are suspended solids and  organic materials.  The usually rapid
 increase in sedimentation and biochemical oxygen demand can harm
 aquatic  life.
      Runoff from urban paving also contains lead, cadmium, and other
 toxic  substances, and constitutes a major polluter of soils, streams,
 and groundwater.  The 30,000 miles of highways are deteriorating
 rapidly, accelerating leaching and creating a growing disposal
 problem.  Much of paving was surfaced with asbestos mine tailings,
 and along with demolition of old buildings is likely to release
 asbestos fibers to the environment.  In addition, buildings that
 were used for manufacturing, processing, and storage, especially
 before modern health and safety regulations, may contain residues of
 toxic  substances.  The corrosive effects of acid precipitation
 add to the  potential for  environmental dispersal of these toxic
 residues.
     Future understanding of the contribution of acid rain to the
 dispersal of toxic substances  in the  environment,  through corrosion
 of buildings, contamination of water,  bioaccumulation,  or leaching
 into the soil, will  depend on  the results of further scientific
 investigation as  well  as on the  future of environmental  control of
sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxides  release.   However,  acid rain  is
a politically significant environmental  issue,  of both  international
and interregional  concern.  Public  acknowledgement of a  close tie
between acid rain  and  toxic metal  contamination  could exacerbate the
 issue  even  further.

-------
                                -145-
 D.   A  SUMMARY  OF  EMERGING,  NEAR-TERM  POLITICAL  ISSUES AFFECTING
     THE  CHEMICAL  INDUSTRIES
     The social,  political, and environmental trends and  events
 mentioned above will exacerbate some  issues already on  the  public
 agenda and create new public policy challenges.  Besides  the
 general  environmental issues already  discussed, that is,  demand
 for  more rigorous control of toxic chemicals and the deve"!opment
 of a flexible  but effective all-media strategy  for reducing pollu-
 tion, some specific issues  that will  come to a  head in  the  next
 two  to five years should be reemphasized because they may have
 major impacts  on the chemical industries.
     One major issue will be the chemical industry's concern that
 trade secrets and confidential  information be protected vs.  the
 demand of public interest groups that the government make avail-
 able information on:
     --  the quality of health and safety testing information for
        chemicals;
     -- chemical  formulas of pesticides and other chemicals;
     -- manufacturing process data, including intermediate
        chemicals present in the workplace;
     -- analytical techniques used to obtain toxicology data;  and
     -- administrative proceedings involving chemical  companies.
Official  Federal  policy is yet to be developed on interagency shar-
 ing of confidential  chemical industry data.
     A second major issue will  be genetic screening.   Some industry
work environments contain carcinogens, embryo- and fetotoxins, skin
and lung irritants,  and other health hazards.   Fear of worker
compensation suits is leading some companies to  screen workers
for susceptibility to these conditions.   Tin's  has  already become
a civil rights issue and a women's rights issue.  The  legality and
social  acceptability of screening workers according to fertility,
genetic,  or lifestyle criteria  will  become importaiit political
 issues in the next decade.  Hhether screening  discriminates  ac'a
certain workers and  whether it  alleviates the  industry's obliga-

-------
                              -146-
tion to ensure a safe workplace will  be of primary concern.   The
Congressional  Office of Technology Assessment (121) identifies

three issues that Congress faces on genetic screening.   They are:

     — What actions could Congress take with respect to genetic
        testing in the workplace?
     -- How could Congress regulate genetic testing in  the work-
        place?
     -- How could Congress foster the development and use of this
        technology?
     Other policy issues  to  be  resolved in  the near future are:
     -- How should the U.S.  government react  to  hazardous  and
        toxic  substance problems that transcend  national  borders?
        What accountability should the U.S. have to other nations
        for chemical testing, monitoring exports, notifying  other
        nations of chemical  toxicity, or compensating victims of
        hazardous chemical exposure?
     — What responsibility  does society  have for  compensating
        unwitting  victims  of hazardous  chemicals?   Which of
        several  approaches are  appropriate  for victim compensa-
        tion when  no  liable  party  can be  found:   Federal grants
        to states,  Federal loan  compensations programs, a  pollu-
        tion charge on  manufacturers,  or  a  fund maintained by
        potential  polluters?  Satisfactory  solutions are still
        being  sought.   This  issue will  be of great  importance to
        Congress,  the  public, industry, and government.
     --  Who  should  have to prove the  safety or hazard of a chemi-
        cal?   Will  the  trend  toward placing this burden on the
        chemical companies place an undue economic  burden  upon
        them and also make them  more  susceptible to lawsuits?

     --  How  should  the jurisdiction of  agencies and courts be
        separated and clarified?

-------
                     -147-
                  CHAPTER 5

     FRONTIERS IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Scientific and technological advances are re-
solving old uncertainties about toxic substances
and creating new policy questions.  The ability
to detect smaller amounts of chemicals is forcing
us to deal with ever-lower levels of materials
and their effects.  As science links environ-
mental conditions, chemicals, human genetics,
and behavior, decisions about any single factor
become questionable.  Risk assessment will be
a key to the interpretation of scientific data
and social priorities regarding toxic substances.
A particular issue will be setting acceptable
levels of exposure in different environments
for populations with different risks and dif-
ferent priorities.  Understanding the synergism
and antagonism of chemicals will  become more
important.  Technological advances are occurring
in analytical chemistry, toxicology, environ-
mental transformation of chemicals, epidemiology,
exposure analysis, and metabolic transformation.

Scientific and technological innovations in the
generation and disposal of toxic substances are
also altering regulatory needs.  New products
and wastes of particular concern include plas-
tics, composites, telematics-based materials,
ceramics, batteries, photovoltaics, and metals.
Two generic technologies affecting toxic sub-
stances are biotechnology and telematics.  The
application of biotechnologies to chemical
manufacture, to waste management, to environ-
mental technologies, and to health therapy,
has a potential for radical  change.  Telematics
are directly changing both society and industry,
through communication and information manage-
ment, computer control  of industry processes,
chemical  monitors, expert systems, structural
modeling, and medical applications.

-------
                                -148-
 A.    CHEMICALS, MAN,  AND ENVIRONMENT:   TESTING AND MONITORING
      TECHNOLOGIES
    .  Three complementary factors have  enhanced our ability to
detect the effects of environmental  factors  and influences  on
people:
      • major advances in chemical and  physical  analytical
        technology,  including toxicology;
      t a greatly improved ability to diagnose clinical  abnor-
        mality at an early stage  and  assess  individual  suscep-
        tibilities;  and
      •  the development  of powerful  methods  of information  collec-
        tion,  storage, and retrieval.   (1)
 1
    Chemical Analysis, Toxicology and Risk Assessment
     Central to the perception and regulation of toxic substances
is the ability to identify, detect, and quantify chemicals in the
environment and in man, and to assess both their toxicity and the
factor of risk they pose to man and environment.  Toxicity is an
inherent characteristic of a chemical substance defining the ad-
verse effect on an organism exposed at a given dose level (environ-
mental toxicity broadly measures the effect of a substance on an
ecosystem).  The actual hazard posed by a chemical  depends on the
likelihood that a chemical  will be present at a harmful exposure
level.  A chemical can have relatively high inherent toxicity but
can be considered nonhazardous if actual exposure does not result
in a dosage high enough to produce the toxic effect.
     Toxicity is but one factor in determining the threat a sub-
stance presents to individuals, to society, and to the environment,.
Exposure can be estimated from production, use, and disposal  informa-
tion coupled with understanding of the chemistry of the substance,
its environmental  mobility, degradation and transformation products,
metabolic uptake and breakdown.  The risk to society from a substance
factors in both its  health  hazard (including toxicity) and the level
of exposure that can be expected both in numbers of people and
volume of substance.  Complicating these general susceptibilities

-------
                               -149-
 are differing reactions to the same exposures and even dosages.  Added
 on top of this, and perhaps most important of all, is the changing
 perception of risk — reasonable and acceptable levels of individual
 and societal risk and relative acceptability of different sources
 and types of risk.
     As measurement technology has advanced it has unveiled the
 pervasive low-level presence of possibly to.vic substances throughout
 the environment and the human population.  Unfortunately, under-
 standing of the relationship between levels of exposure and levels
 of risk, especially in the critical region at our limits of detec-
 tion, is not keeping pace with the technological  capability to mea-
 sure low levels of substances.  This may be driving a reorientation
 of risk reduction away from the now unattainable  goal of zero expo-
 sure, zero risk towards minimum exposure, acceptable risk.  The dif-
 ficulties of balancing the concerns of different  sectors of society,
 different at-risk groups, and scientifically versus socially signifi-
 cant levels of risk is discussed  in Chapter 4.B.2 on social trends
 in perception of hazard and risk.
     Underlying the policy process are fundamental scientific and
 technological tools to investigate and describe a chemical substance
and its life cycle interaction with the environment, chemical, physi-
cal,  biological, and human,  A comprehensive chemical analysis encom-
passes a host of skills and techniques: analytical chemistry, to
 identify and characterize a chemical;  toxicity testing,  to assess
the inherent toxicity of a chemical; exposure analysis,  to provide
 information about the expected use of and exposure to a  substance;
statistics and data processing skills, to translate laboratory and
field data into information useful  to  policymaking; epidemiology,
to acquire data on human populations to complement laboratory studies;
and medicine and pharmacology, to understand the  mechanism of action
of a  chemical.
     One science to which these tools  will  be applied in the science
of risk analysis and regulation is  toxicology.

-------
                                -150-
      Toxlcology may be applied to a single species, usually man,
 or the total environment.
      Due to recent regulation, Including TSCA, and heightened pub-
 lic and corporate awareness of the Importance of toxlcological
 analysis, demand 1s growing rapidly for better, faster, cheaper,
 more precise, and more accurate testing and monitoring.  A paral-
 lel need 1s for sensible and efficient priority-setting for both
 research and regulation.  New substances enter the market at rates
 estimated at from 200 to 1000 annually. (2)  Estimates of the num-
 ber of chemicals in commerce range from 55,000 to over 75,000, and
 many of these have not been tested, or only minimally so; tens of
 thousands have unknown production levels. (3)  The Chemical Abstracts
 Service records over 5 million distinct known chemicals. (4)  A Na-
 tional Academy of Science committee report on toxicity testing needs
 and priorities found in Its study subsample that about 78% of chemi-
 cals in commerce (versus pesticides, cosmetics, drugs, and food addi-
 tives) did not have even minimal  toxicity information available. (5)
      Current  proposals to focus OTS' effort propose.streamlining
 reporting requirements for classes of chemicals of consistently
 lowest priority,  such as polymers, inorganics, and biologicals,
 or those no longer  in production.  This would be a further step
 in priority-setting to allocate testing, analysis, and
 decisionmaking  resources. (6)

     Priority setting issues and trends are discussed in Section B
of this chapter; emerging trends in toxicology — protocol standardi-
zation, new methodologies, computer modeling, and study of mixtures
rather than isolated chemicals — are discussed below.
     Toxlcological analysis, coupled with exposure analysis, epi-
demiology, and analytical  chemistry, provides a comprehensive pic-
ture of the hazard of a  chemical might pose as it moves through
its life cycle.   These analyses provide the foundation for risk
analysis and regulation,  shown schematically in Exhibit 22.

-------
                               -151-
                             EXHIBIT  22
                  ANALYSIS  OF TOXIC  SUBSTANCES
                   EXPOSURE
                   ANALYSIS
                                   Source:  J.F.  Coates,  Inc.,  1983
     Comprehensive testing of a  chemical  for  the  purpose  of

analysis includes three main  phases:

     1..  Analytical  chemistry of a  substance  to determine its
         physical  properties, stability,  solubility,  and
         chemical  structure.   This  information  is  vital to
         exposure analysis, as it determines  the most likely
         routes  of exposure from the  chemical standpoint.
     2.   Analysis  of environmental  transport, accumulation, and
         degradation, in air, water,  soil,  and  biota.  Again,
         this  is key both to  charting likely  routes of exposure
         and  to  identifying natural detoxification pathways or
         unanticipated  creation  of  secondary  toxic products.

-------
                                -152-
     3.  Toxicity testing to determine the inherent toxicity or
         the chemical, linked to a dose or exposure level.. In
         this phase classic short-term and chronic toxicity
         tests are used.  These tests also investigate such
         effects as carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, behavioral
         toxicity, neurotoxicity, teratogenicity, and ecotox-
         icity — the adverse effect on biological systems in the
         the environment.  The specific tests carried out under
         this rubric vary with the chemical, route of exposure,
         health priorities, and with advancing technology in
         testing regimes.

2•   Ana 1 y tica 1 Cher.iis try ^Push ing__the_ Linn ts of Sens 1_tiyi ty
     The first stage of evaluating a chemical's threat to society
is analytical chemistry.  Analytical chemistry techniques provide
the tools for many other specialists ~ in detection and monitoring
of chemicals, in characterization, and in measuring the concentra-
tion and species of chemicals.(7)
     The key trend in analytical chemistry is the increasing
sensitivity and specificity of detection.  We are approaching
single-molecule detection.   The other avenue of significant
progress is computational and instrumental advances that make
possible multidimensional chemical analysis, or "chemical
fingerprints." (8)
     Within ten years, sophisticated multi-species analyzers.
should enable chemists to identify the components of complex mix-
tures.  The Food and Drug Administration uses .an ICP (inductively
coupled plasma) process which can scan for nearly all  elements of
the periodic table in a single sample, (9)  This level  of complexity
is arriving more slowly with organic chemicals; since there are at
least  five  million  chemical  entities  identified,  and minute  differ-
ences  between them in one sample may later be vital to assessing
toxicity, the problem is vastly more difficult than with elements
such as metals.  However, the technology is now being developed to
look for several  organic compounds simultaneously. (10)

-------
                               -153-
     Pesticide chemists, who in their research must look at an
entire  family of compounds being applied to the land or water,
have often led the way in developing techniques for looking at
mixtures of organic compounds.
     Telematics have revolutionized analytical chemistry; a com-
puter can record and process and link data that would have taken
20  chemists to do ten years ago.  However, the computer processing
is  still limited by detector technology, which is lagging. (11)
     The accuracy of analytical chemistry  in  support of  regulation
 is  limited by  the inaccuracies  inherent  in  interlaboratory analytical
variables and  the limitations of reliability  near highly  sensitive
detection levels,  (12)
     An evaluation by the Association of Official Analytical  Chemists
 (AOAC)  of the  reproducibility of results from standardized and
analytical procedures, revealed  substantial  disparity  between labs.
     The interlaboratory coefficient of  variation obtained in
collaborative  studies increased with decreasing concentration  of
chemical as follows:
              At 1000 ppm, o% variation;
              at 1 ppm, 16% variation; and
              at 0.001 ppm (1 ppb), 60%  variation.  (13)
     The Centers for Disease Control have set the acceptable safe
level of human exposure to dioxin at 1 ppb.  (14) The coefficient
of  variation within a single analytical  chemist.rv laboratory was
from 1/4 to 2/3 of that between laboratories. (15)
      Some  problems of analytical  testing beyond  measurement
inaccuracy  are  "inadequate  baseline  data, mounting administrative
costs,  a projected shortage of analytical chemists,  gaps  in
research,  slowness of technology  transfer,  and adversarial  relation-
ships  among organizations."   (16)
     A  1973 American Chemical Society report  identified the over-
riding  problem in toxicology to be an increasing gap belwcen  the
exploding work load and the availability of qualified scientists

-------
                                -154-
and technicians.  (17) Of special concern is striking the approp-
riate balance between satisfying  the demand for increased testing
and maintaining the quality and reliability of chemical analysis.
     Two organizations that have been especially active in collabora-
tive testing and verification are the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) and the Association of Official Analytical
Chemists (AOAC).  The National Bureau of Standards has provided
a vital  function by developing and distributing Standard Reference
Materials.  (18)  Communication, collaboration, oversight, and
standardization will all  be increasingly critical  in the future to
assure the continued quality of analytical  chemistry and toxi-
cology,  and to ensure the use of the best possible technical
foundation in regulatory decision making,
3.  Toxicity Testing
     The need for faster and cheaper toxicological regimes is
pushing the state-of-the-art and could significantly enhance the
availability and use of toxicological screening for the home and
the Fortune 500 companies.
     Standard bioassay techniques, using up to 800 animals for a
single test, are often costly and time-consuming.   One industry
source estimated that comprehensive toxicity testing for a single
potential  product could cost $4 to $5 million. (16)  A chart of
effort for standard toxicity tests performed at Dow Chemical's
Toxicology Research Laboratory is shown in  Exhibit 23.
     According  to a 1983 Office of Technology Assessment study, only
about half of pre-manufacturing notices  (PMNs) report any toxicity
data, although  the percentage rises slightly (to about 60%) if
polymers, generally accepted as non-toxic,  are excluded. (20)  The
study found the most frequently reported information was acute
oral toxicity (in 50% of PMNs for manufactured chemicals and in 43%
of all PMNs).   It also noted "mutagenicity tests,  the only tests
that bear on chronic toxicity, were reported on less than one-fifth
(17%) of all PMNs."  (21)

-------
                                -155-




                           EXHIBIT  23

                     TOXICITY  TEST EFFORT
                         Source: Dot* Chemical, who Protects
                          Our Health and Environment? 1980. p. 10
     A National Research Council  (NRC)  study  went  a  step further to

investigate the quality of toxicity  testing as  measured against
currently accepted reference protocols.   Examining the design and
results of 664 toxicity tests on  a subsample  of 100  substances
representing pesticides, cosmetics,  drugs, food additives,  and
chemicals in commerce, the NRC committee  found
     "...only 8% of the tests in  the subsample  met the stan-
     dards of the reference protocol guidelines and  another
     19% of the tests performed were judged to  be  adequate
     by the committee's standards„...The  quality of  design,
     execution, and reporting of  toxicity studies  was  not
     uniform among the various types of experiments....In gen-
     eral, chronic studies, inhalation studies, and  more com-
     plex studies with specific end points (e.ga,  hemotoxicity,
     genetic toxicity, and effects on the  conceptus)  are most
     frequently needed." (22)

     Exhibit 24 presents the NRC  rating of test quality.

-------
                                          EXHIBIT  24


                   QUALITY RATINGS  OF  TOXICITY TESTS DONE ON 100 SUBSTANCES:

                               A NATIONAL  RESEARCH COUNCIL STUDY
                                    Subsample Cateaory and Proportion
                                    of Tests with Indicated Rating (%) *
                                                   Drugs and
                         Pesticides                Excipients
                         and Inert     Cosmetic      in Drug       Food      Chemicals
       	      	Ingredi ents  Ingredients  Formulations  Additives  in Commerce

Meets current
  guidelines                 10            6             849
Adequate, but does
  not meet guidelines

Not adequate, but
  retesting not
  needed

Inadequate and re-
  testing needed

Adequacy cannot
  be judged

  TOTAL
                             22
                             32
                             17
                             18
20
38
31
19
27
16
              30
10
31
31
24
            20
            21
                         34
                         17
                                               PROPORTION
                                                OF TESTS
                                                IN WHOLE
                                               SUBSAMPLE
                                      19
                                      29
                         26
                         19
                                                                                                           en
                                                                                                           i
                            100 (164     100 (98      100 (106
                                tests)       tests)        tests)
                          100  (126    100  (170      100  (664
                              tests)       tests)        tests)
   Percentages may not sum to 100 due to rounding.

 SOURCE:  National Research Council, Toxicity Testi mj:  Strateqi es to Determjne Needs and Priorities.
         D.C. National Academy Press, 1984, p. 94.

-------
                                -157-
     New methodologies which employ cultured cells rather than
batteries of lab animals are enabling toxicologists to examine the
specific effect of a chemical.at the cellular or molecular level.
     Such cellular regimes are attractive for several reasons:
cultured human cells, or DNA, can be used where human subjects
could not, giving data on human toxicity and avoiding question-
able extrapolation from animal to human; maintenance and screening
is much cheaper and faster for cell cultures than for lab animals;
and the technique provides insight into the actual molecular
mechanisms of toxicity (which might provide means of mitigating
toxicity within the body after exposure).
     ~ At the cooperative Chemical Industry Institute of Toxi-
        cology one line of research systematically compares the
        mutagenic effects of chemicals directly on human DNA
        sequences.  Results suggest that chemicals carry distinc-
        tive mutagenic fingerprints; whether generalizable to
        all mechanisms of toxicity or not, this raises the pos-
        sibility of directly tracing a culprit chemical to a
        region or producer from observed toxic effects.  (23)
     -- A National Research Council committee recommended in a
        report to EPA that cell tests be used for most mutagen
        screening, with animal bioassays being used only if
        cell results are ambiguous. (24)
In addition, an array of promising regimes are being developed --
in insects, amphibians, simple animals such as the hydra.  Such
techniques compromise between the desirability of in vitro testing
in a complex organism (preferably as much like man in its response
as possible) and the economic necessity of reducing testing costs
and time.  (25)    ;
4.  Telematics-Based Technologies
Structure Activity Relationships
     Extensive  research is  going  into modeling structure activity
relationships (SAR),  which  link biological  activity to chemical
structure.   Using  SAR rules,  a new chemical  might be compared  to

-------
                               -158-
 structural  analogs,  assigned  a  priority  for  testing  based  on  the
 observed  toxicity  of its  analogs  and  assessed  for  toxicity poten-
 tial.   As existing testing  resources  --  time,  money, and lab
 space  --  are  woefully inadequate  to deal with  even the  chemicals
 currently in  commerce,  reliable SAR algorithms could be invaluable.
     Structure-activity relationships  (SAR)  are already being used
 informally  in priority  setting  for testing and regulation  for
 chemicals.
     — Benzene was  under suspicion for excess risk of  leukemia,
        long  before  the analytic verification of this,  because of
        its capabilities of depressing the bone marrow  and causing
        chromosomal  abnormalities in a manner similar to known
        leukemogenic  agents.  The rapid acceptance of the  carcin-
        ogenicity  of  the drug Chlornaphzine  and its consequent
        withdrawal  from use based on only a  few case reports of
        bladder cancer was due  largely to the recognition  that the
        drug was a structural derivative of  betanapthylamine, a
        potent bladder carcinogen among occupationally  exposed
        workers. (26)
     Further  in the future, SAR may significantly displace analyti-
 cal chemistry and  toxicity testing, both to  assess the  inherent
 toxicity  of chemicals and rank them for regulation or further
 testing.  Fast-paced advances in computer expert systems,  graphics
 capability, pattern recognition, and comprehensive database manage-
 ment will  accelerate the implementation of SAR as a low-cost, fast
 method of analyzing the potential  health effects  and  environmental
 fate of new chemicals.  -
     The effective and reliable use of SAR relies critically upon
 the very costly  accumulation of a  comprehensive database of known
 correlations between chemical  structures and  biological  effects,
especially toxicity.  Once this supporting database is  established,
generalized rules  can be inferred  --  such as  the  predictable unit
of toxicity associated with  a phenol  group or polyhalogenation --
on the genetic,  behavioral,  mutagenic,  carcinogenic,  reproductive,
neurotoxic, and  other toxic  effects.

-------
                                -159-
tnosensors
     In vivo biosensors are being developed to monitor -- and in
many cases control -- the serum levels of glucose, antibodies against
specific disease, albumin, urea, viruses, reproductive hormones,
cancer-linked proteins, and pH and carbon dioxide. (27)  Based on
a blend of new techniques - immunological, electronic, biomaterials,
membrane, enzyme - these biosensors can be as small as a few milli-
meters square.  Such sophisticated technology could in the near
future be adapted to monitor the biological presence of toxic
substances or their degradation products, providing personal,
portable toxicological screens.  Miniature computerized biosensors
could monitor metabolic processes and help control vital body
functions such as heartbeat, ovulation, or fetal development.
Further down the road biosensors might be equipped to automatically
dispense neutralizing or therapeutic agents.
5.  Chemical Mixtures:  Synergy and Antagonism
     Toxicology of chemicals acting in combination rather than in,
isolation present a major avenue of research for the  future.   As
primary toxins are gradually controlled, the more subtle effects
of mixtures will  be revealed.   (28)
     Chemicals are transformed as they move through the environ-
ment or through an organism's  biochemistry; the same  chemical
released under different conditions or in association with different
mixtures of chemicals presents correspondingly different toxico-
logical problems.   Most current techniques  examine only a single
chemical  at a time and consequently cannot  pick up any synergistic
or antagonistic interaction  of chemicals.
     Interacting  synergistically within the body, certain organic
phosphate pesticides  and chlorinated hydrocarbons together generate
ten times the health  risk they would separately.   (The chlorinated
hydrocarbons interfere with  the action of cholinesterase in the
liver,  leaving nerve  tissue  especially susceptible to  damage  from
the phosphates.)   (29)

-------
                                 -160-
     Often  the enideiniological and analytical  tools are  not  fine-
 grained enough to distinguish between additive and multiplicative
 models of chemical interaction.  However, the distinction may become
 vital in future controversies over compensation and liability for
 risk.
     Carcinogens are generally classed as initiators or  as promoters
 which seem  to precipitate potential tumors once they have been
 initiated.  Carcinogenesis is considered to be the result of a
 complex interaction between initiator and promoter, and  between
 genetic, chemical, and environmental factors.  (30)  Both testing
 and regulation will have to cope with this increasing awareness of
 chemical mixtures, rather than individual chemicals, as  toxic
 substances.
 6.  Institutions
     Private contract labs are likely to remain the dominant
 providers of toxicity testing as the demand for testing  rises.
     Although significant reliability problems ranging from poor
 quality control to outright fraud have been revealed by  recent
 investigations (the most noteworthy being the  1983 exposure  of
 Industrial  Bio-Test Laboratories), oversight mechanisms  are
 responding.  Examples include the Toxicology Laboratory Accreditation
 Board or T-Labs sponsored by the Society of Toxicology,  FDA's
 Good Laboratory Practices program, and the Chemical  Industry
 Institute of Toxicology efforts  in "testing  the tests."  (31)
 In-house industry testing is not likely to extend  much beyond
 the needs created by  regulation,  primarily for economic reasons.
Toxicity testing  in other developed countries is generally on a
par with the U.S.;  OECD standards set the pace for many proto-
 cols.  (32)  Increasing international standardization should
 discourage duplication of efforts and allow use of foreign data
 to fulfill  U.S. regulatory requirements.

-------
                                  -161-
  7.  Epidemiology
       Epidemiology, the study of the distribution and determinants
  of disease frequency in human populations, provides another
  building block of the scientific assessment for risk of disease
  due to exposure to health hazards.  Identification of the observed
  distribution of a disease in a population is referred to as des-
  criptive epidemiology.  (A classic example of descriptive epidem-
  iology observations leading to hypothesis about the cause of disease
  is the 1854 study by John Snow.  Snow observed that the death rates
  from cholera in London were five times higher in districts which were
  supplied drinking water by the Southwark and Vauxhall water company
  than  in districts supplied by the Lambeth water company.  This ob-
  servation eventually led to the identification of sewage-contaminated
  drinking water as the major cause of cholera.) (33)  While descrip-
  tive epidemiology is useful in generating hypotheses and establish-
  ing correlations, it is rarely useful  in verifying a cause-and-
  effect relationship between a particular exposure and a specific
  disease.   Descriptive epidemiology must be supported by analytical
  epidemiology, designed to identify the determinants of disease and
  oriented towards specific groups of interest, often a population at
  high risk.
       Epidemiology is a coarse science.  Because of the number of
variables involved -- genetic and biochemical  differences, length,
timing, and route of exposure, latency period,  subgroups at high
risk, interacting factors -- it is essentially  a reactive science.
The now well-established link between estrogens and  human cancers
was not shown until  1971, when a specific group of young girls  who
had been exposed to diethylstilbesterol  (DES)  in utero developed
vaginal  adenocarcinoma with latencies of 14 to  22 years.   (34)
       The  strengths of epidemiology are three-fold.   (35)  First,
it allows direct measurement of risk of disease in a  human population
rather than laboratory animals.   Secondly, it  can provide insight
into the mechanisms  of a disease.

-------
                                 -162-
      For  instance, epiderniological studies of kidney transfer
 patients  who had received  immunosuppressive drugs helped destroy
 the concept of  immunologic surveillance as a cancer control mech-
 anism.  Epidemiology also  revealed that leukemia is associated with
 an inherited disease involving high chromosome fragility, leading
 to subsequently-verified inferences that a primary step in leukemia
 is chromosome breakage.   (36)
      The  third  strength is the ability to extrapolate epidemio-
 logic information to predict human health hazards at low levels of
 exposure  that cannot be studied directly.
      There are  also major weaknesses to epidemiology.  Most import-
 ant is the latent period between exposure to a cause of a disease and
 the actual manifestation, of the disease itself.   For most chronic
 diseases  these  latent periods are quite long, from 5 years to over
 50 years.  Secondly, epidemiology does poorly at tracking down
 the causes of very low levels of risk.  The lowest excess cancer
 risk  that is directly observable in a group of exposed individuals
 and is generally accepted as being specifically  due to that factor is
 the 30% excess  risk of childhood leukemia among  children who were
 exposed to radiation in utero in the last trimester of pregnancy.  (37)
                         "                                     »«
 It becomes next to impossible to say with any certainty that a
 very  low level  of risk is caused by a similarly  low level  of
exposure to a single substance.   This is partly  due to another
weakness of epidemiology, its inherent inability to isolate a
single toxic substance, or control  the unknown risk factors for
the disease in  question.   One general health effect, such as a rise
 in lung cancer., may mask several  different exposures or causes.
 Detailed, long-term information  about individual  exposures to speci-
 fied substances and environments could significantly improve and
 focus epidemiological  studies of actual  exposure, this  would likely
entail significantly stepped-up  information gathering.

-------
                                 -163-
       Dozens of Federal  and state databases  with  extensive  informa-
  tion on health, occupation, lifestyle,  industry, chemicals,  etc.
  already exist.  The volume of data  creates  no  big-technical  bar-
  riers, but accessibility and comparability  of  data  could.   Data
  is often compiled according to political  boundaries,  but would  in
  many cases be more appropriate for  toxics investigation  by environ-
  mental boundaries, such as airsheds,  watersheds, or aquifiers.  Or,
  the information needed  may not be available for  large groups of
  people or over a long period of time, factors  critical to  epidemio-
  logical work on low levels of risk.
       Privacy issues are a potentially major concern,  although on-
going epidemiological monitoring has  not  run  into  any big  diffi-
culties or public protests; for example,  the  Centers  for Disease
Control Birth Defects Monitoring Program receives  regular  reports
from 1200 hospitals and health care centers across the  nation,
encompassing one-third of U.S. births.   (38)   However,  industries,
health care institutions, and other groups  may raise  restrictive
barriers for fear of liability or privacy suits.   Technical  and
public attention to these issues is mandatory if epidemiologic in-
formation is to realize an important  role in  the identification and
quantification of health  hazards in the future.
  Epidemiological Techniques
       Some of the important new techniques of epidemiology  are
  study of sentinel diseases, low-cost  retrospective  studies,  metabo-
  lic or biochemical epidemiology, evaluation of special risk  groups,
  and identification of specific exposure monitors.  (39)
       Sentinel  diseases  can act as very  sensitive indicators  of
  general, low-level environmental  hazard.  Of particular  concern
  are reproductive problems, including  congenital  defects, spontan-
  eous abortion, and infertility,  which in  the population  at highest
  risk may act as sentinel  diseases and warn  of  health  hazards for
  the general  population.

-------
                                -164-
       Retrospective case control epidemiology  uses data and samples
  stored  from  past  studies  to examine new questions.  (40)
       Biochemical  or metabolic epidemiology focuses  on specific
  tissue  dosages:and effects which result from  more general environ-
  mental  exposureSo  These  may reveal biochemical changes long before
  the  development of external symptoms, providing an  early warning
  system.
       The study of special risk  groups also can help focus  on  the
actual levels  of risk  by revealing  a much  more  sensitive  response
to a substance.  For example,  a  study of saccharin  and bladder
cancer used a  population of nonsmoking  women, a group with  a  much
lower risk of  bladder  cancer than the general population.   Iden-
tifying special risk groups may also provide unique opportunities
to evaluate disease promoters  and cofactors  that require  a  sub-
population that has already been  exposed  to  a disease risk
factor.
       Studies of exposure  indicators can reveal chemical  means of
  monitoring past exposure.  Analytical chemistry techniques allow
  assessment of the  probability and  magnitude of past exposure to
  certain  substances by  evaluating the  persistence  of these sub-
  stances  or their degradation products in body tissues.  Recent
  studies  have indicated the value of assessing  chromosomal abnor-
  malities  in  circulating lymphocytes as an  index of  previous
  exposure  to  ionizing radiation, and have held  out the possibility
  that such assays may be an accurate indicator  of past exposure to
 mutagens  in general.  (41)
  3.  Environmental  Technology
       Environmental technologies -- sampling, monitoring, pollution
  control,  and  cleanup -- are rapidly becoming more sophisticated
  with  next-generation analytical  tools and the  advent of new tele-
  matics and biology-based  technologies.  These  new technologies
  are increasing awareness  of the presence and  fate of chemicals  in
  the environment, but understanding and policy  are lagging behind.

-------
                                 -165-
We can achieve a new scale of integration with satellite and com-
puter technologies; investigate new places with temperature- and
corrosion-resistant equipment; reach new detail with highly sensi-
tive detectors; and track new compounds with qualitatively different,
biochemistry-based detectors.
     The .outstanding trend is increasing sensitivity to chemical
agents in all environmental media.  Dioxin can be detected at the
level of a few parts per quadrillion; the effects of organic contamina-
tion at that level is unknown, however. (42)   This sensitivity is
revealing the pervasiveness of chemical contamination in the environ-
ment, heightening the need for understanding of dose-response
relationships and for consistent policy on limiting chemical release
and managing contamination.
     Many more chemicals can vbe detected than can be identified;
only 9-145{ (by weight) of compounds detected in a 19UO EPA
National  Organics Reconnaissance Survey were actually characterized. (43)
Even more troublesome is the widening gap between the ability
to detect chemicals at extremely low levels and the ability to
understand the health and environmental implications of chemicals
at such concentrations.   This gap is likely to exacerbate the con-
flict over limits of acceptability for release and control  of
chemicals in the environment.
     The technologies sufficient for portable, comprehensive,
personal  monitors are now being developed.  (44)   As waste contain-
ment procedures are upgraded, and as point-source pollution control
is fully deployed, the contribution of minor contaminants and
small-scale, overlooked  wastes to the total environmental load
will grow.  As government assurances of safety are shown to be
misleading in the light  of better data, individuals may turn to
personal  or community-sponsored monitoring  systems.   This in turn
is likely to increase the awareness, concern, and activism  of
citizens  on the quality  of their personal  environment and contamina-
tion of water,  air, and  built environment.

-------
                                -166-
    Remote sensing and computer modeling technologies are becoming
more and more vital to identifying and tracking environmental con-
taminants, especially as awareness of transnational transport of
chemicals grows.  International data is becoming important to the
complete modeling of the environment and of chemical transport.
Satellite observation in some cases can provide unique tracking of the
conditions in an airshed or watershed following a chemical spill or
from a chronic source. (45)  Fingerprints of air masses measure air-
borne concentrations of chemicals, matching them with known chemical
profiles characteristic of a specific geographic area.  Once finger-
printed, the air masses can be traced as they move across the country,
through the atmosphere.
    Fiberoptic sensing and robotics are providing means to analyze
chemical processes-inside such previously inaccessible places as
radioactive or highly toxic waste disposal  sites or in extremely
hot or corrosive process  streams.  (46)
    Biotechnology holds great promise for detecting and neutraliz-
ing potentially toxic chemicals,  especially in waste treatment and
drinking water quality control.   The potential of biotechnology
is such that, in theory,  any organic contaminant can be altered or
degraded by a naturally occurring or an engineered enzyme system.
     -- Some microorganisms produce enzymes which polymerize and
        effectively neutralize some organic compounds, precursors
        to carcinogens, which now cannot be removed from drinking
        water.  (47)
     Development of genetically engineered microorganisms for toxic
waste treatment could be hastened by natural mutation among micro-
organisms extensively exposed to  toxic substances.  While the
detoxification capability of the  microorganisms might be enhanced,
the possibility that undesirable  but hardy microorganisms resistant
to all  sorts of toxic compounds might arise cannot be overlooked.
     As biological  systems evolved in an aqueous environment,
biotechnology-based monitoring and cleanup is especially suited

-------
                               -167-
to dealing with groundwater contamination and industrial waste-
water treatment.  However, as with all pollution control systems,
biology-based technologies will themselves present a new waste
disposal problem.
     In the future it is likely that more emphasis will be placed
on gathering extensive information about the transport and trans-
formation of chemicals in the environment. (48) Much of this data
can be predicted from laboratory analysis, and computer modeling
and expert systems are likely to play an increased role.  How-
ever, priorities for research must be set, as it is far beyond our
capability or knowledge to continually and thoroughly inventory
the environment for all chemicals present.

-------
                                -168-
B.  PRIORITY SETTING: THE IMPLICATIONS OF INCREASED INFORMATION
    AND LIMITED RESOURCES
1.  Defining Hazard
     Quantifying the inherent toxicity of a substance is often less
important than estimating the actual hazard it poses to individuals
and society.  Overall, hazard to society increases with:
     t  the number of people exposed,
     0  the individual exposure levels in that population and
        exposure among particularly susceptible groups,
     •  the route, frequency, and duration of exposure,
     •  the likelihood of a toxic response at that exposure
        level,
     •  the severity of that potential toxic response,
     •  the costs to society of compensating for and treating
        health effects. (49)
     This coarse definition of hazard has several  shortcomings.  It
averages the hazard over the entire population at risk, downplaying
the variation in response between outlying individuals at highest
and lowest risk.  An averaged level  of individual  exposure in, say,
a certain occupational  environment,  does not reflect the poten-
tially wide differences in actual individual  exposures; a few
meters might make all the difference between a lethal  and a harm-
less level  of exposure.  Similarly,  "safe" levels  of exposure might
vary as much as an order of magnitude among  individuals, due to
individual  genetic variability.  (50)
     Future regulation will  need to  reflect  changing perceptions  of
risk, broadening the question from health hazards  to include the
societal costs  and opportunities in  terms of economics and life-
style.  Under TSCA the Congress  charges EPA  with avoiding "unreason-
able risk"  to society from toxic substances  — leaving the determina-
tion of unreasonable to EPA.  EPA incorporates four factors into  its
definition  of unreasonable risk  under TSCA:

-------
                              -169-
     1.  The toxicity of the chemical;
     2.  Anticipated exposure from use  of the chemical;
     3.  The availability of substitute materials; and
     4.  The costs of regulatory control measures.
(See Chapter 4.B.2 for a related overview of trends 1n perception
of hazard and risk.)
2.  The Need to Set Priorities
     Priorities will have to be set.  With limited time, money,
manpower, facilities, and equipment, and the need to not unduly
delay the commercialization of products, a ranking system must be
established for consideration of chemicals to be tested, for actual
testing, and for regulation.  Even at the current level of testing,
costs are high:
      -- The annual  cost of analytical  testing  in  the  U.S. was
         estimated to be about $50  billion in 1982.  (51)
      — The average  chemical  company spends about $1.7 million
         per year  specifically on toxicity testing according  to
         a  1981  survey conducted for the CMA (112 companies  varying
         in  size responding to the survey together represented just
         over half of the chemical industry in terms of sales
         volume  and employment.).  (52)
      Exhibit 25 shows a preliminary scheme for setting testing
 priorities  which  incorporates known correlations  of structure  and
 toxic effect,  exposure  estimates,  relative concern  over different
 classes of  toxic  effects,  the costs of possible mistakes or mis-
 classifications,  as  well as  the  goal of cost-effectiveness.
      Most priority-setting mechanisms  divide ranking  criteria
 into  two classes  of  environmental  and  human effects:   biological
 activity, Including  toxicity, and  exposure potential,  Including
 production  volume and occupational  exposure.   Ross  and Lu (53)
 proposed an exemplary two-phase  scoring system to  screen chemicals
 for TSCA evaluation.  Exhibit 26 shows  a  list  of  their scoring
 factors (25 1n  all,  in  10  categories)  to  rank  chemicals  for
 priority testing.  A 1979  Interagency  Testing  Committee  workshop
 to  review their priority-setting system similarly divided scoring
 into  potential  exposure  and  biological  effects, but did  not
 generate a  detailed  new  scheme.  (54)

-------
                                  -170-


                              EXKIBIT 25
            PROCESS  FOR SETTING TESTING  PRIORITIES
                               Select
                             aaivcrie of
                          70,000  aubitancei
                                 si/   ~
                               State 1
                              Cautoaated
                               •crcco)
                               ( <$20/iubitance)
Doreant
 li.t
(-10.000
•ubitancei)
 Recyle list
C^AO.OOO
•ubatancea)
                                            _V
                                 Medium-high
                                   priority
                              (thouiaadi)
Medium-concern
    lift
(thousand*)
Long-
li.t
• « lect ion
procei*




Stage 2
>
, S
Doraant
lilt
(thouiandi)

f
I
^*(««^$80/iubitance)

V
RTF teat
ooainationi
(-%200/yr)

f
Recycle
liitd)
(thouiandi)
— r
Agency
aominationi
(^300/yr)
                                   _3t_
                                Stage  3
                                   \r
                               (v tl,JOO/iubit«nce)
       Dormant
        lilt
     (hundred*)
                     Tettiog
                   rccommenditioni
                  (•core* or hundred*)
            Short-lilt
            •election
            procei a
Remit!
added to
d*Cf biiei
>

Stage A
(toxieity
tcitinf)
^
s
Further
teit
recosznrnd*cion*
                                    (^ tlO,000-t500,000/«ubit*nce)
                                    Source:   National  Research Council,
                                     Strategies  to Determine  Needs  and
                                     Priorities  for Toxicity  Testing,
                                     Volume  2;
                                     D.C:  National
                                     p.. 22.
                                       Development,  WasTnngton,
                                          Academy Press, 1982,

-------
                                               -171-
                                              EXHIBIT 26


                             PROPOSED SCORING  FACTORS FOR  EPA  EVALUATION  OF
                                    PRIORITY CHEMICALS UNDER TSCA
                                          (Ross  and  Lu, 1981)

                                    PHASE  I:   BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS


                   1.   Oncogenicity

                   2.   Mutagenicity
                   3.   Embryotoxicity and  fetotoxicity

                   4.   Reproductive  effects for  terrestrial animals

                   5.   Chronic  toxicity
                        —  in terrestrial  animals
                        —  in aquatic animals
                        —  in plants, fungi, and bacteria

                   6.   Acute  toxicity
                        —  in terrestrial  animals
                        —  in aquatic animals
                        —  in plants, fungi, and bacteria


                                     PHASE II:   EXPOSURE POTENTIAL


                   7.   Production volume

                   8.   Environmental  exposure
                        --  environmental transport and transformation
                        —  bi concentration
                        —  environmental release
                        —  quantity  processed
                        —  quantity  in products
                   9,   Occupational  exposure
                        —  number of workers potentially exposed
                        --  quantity  of chemical  manufactured and processed
                        —  number of total worker hours
                        —  quantity  of chemical  used  in industrial products
                        —  level of  potential occupational  exposure

                  10.   Consumer exposure
                        --  number of consumers potentially exposed
                        —  frequency of consumer exposure
                        —  intensity of consumer exposure
                                                  Source:  Robert H0 Ross and Paul Lu,
                                                  Chemical Scoring System Development,
                                                  work sponsored by the Assessment Divi-
                                                  sion, Office of Pesticides and Toxic
                                                  Substances, EPA, Draft, June 1981, p.5,
I	

-------
                             -172-
      Ross and Lu also acknowledged  the  important  role  of subjec-
 tive professional  judgment in  interpreting  uneven and  limited  data
 and reconciling tests and  information of species  and sources,  from
 various  protocols.   Despite the  need for explicit,  socially  and
 scientifically accountable rules  for priority  setting, expert
 judgment will  remain a key in  establishing  priorities  for testing
 as  well  as  in  application  of test results to risk analysis and
.regulation.
 3.   New  Health Concerns
      The changing  population profile will be one  driver  of new
 priorities; the most outstanding  of these will likely  be the
 effects  of  chemicals on aging  and on reproduction.  Diagnoses  of
 subtle behavioral  and mental problems will  also fuel increasing
 concern.  Public concern over  chronic and genetic  risks  is in-
 creasing the need  for test regimes  which reveal the implications
 of  long-term chemical  exposure.   Carcinogenicity  and mutagenicity
 tend  to  factor more  heavily  into  perceived  risk than do  systemic
 or  potentially reversible  effects such as pulmonary disease.,   (55)
 Under TSCA, priority  attention is to be paid to substances known
 or  thought  to  cause  or contribute to cancer, birth defects, or
 gene  mutations.  As  more is  learned about behavioral toxicity,
 neurotoxicity,  and immunotoxicity,  their significance in  deter-
 mining overall  toxicity of a chemical  is likely to increase.
      Exhibit 27 shows one  possible means of ranking different
 health effects  according to  the relative public concern  they
 evoke0   It ranks irreversible effects  worse than reversible ones,
 and dread and  life-threatening effects worse than  structural
 or  functional   ones.  The purpose of such a ranking system would
 be  to give decisionmakers  some sense of priorities when  allocat-
 ing resources,  time, and money to chemical testing and analysis.
 Aging
     The maturing baby boom  generation will  eventually be older
 workers and older decisionmakers who have a vested interest in the

-------
                             -173-
                           EXHIBIT 27
        A POSSIBLE RANKING OF SPECIFIC CHEMICALLY-INDUCED
                    HEALTH EFFECTS IN HUMANS
Effect
Score
Carcinogenesis, somatic and germ cell  mutagenesis, liver
necrosis, uremia, bone marrow depression, embryotoxicity,
fetotoxicity, mucous membrane corrosion

Pulmonary fibrosis, pneumoconiosis, teratogenesis,
aplastic anemia, immune suppression

Osteoporosis, convulsions, asphyxiation

Narcosis, permanent skin damage

Skin and eye corrosion, peripheral  neuropathy,
corneal opacity, retinal damage

Pulmonary and skin sensitization, cholestasis,
mixed-function oxidase induction, methemoglobinemia,
behavioral changes, infertility, lithiasis

Skin, eye, pulmonary, and mucous membrane irritation;
depression of the central nervous system, fume
fever, cholinesterase inhibition
  6

  5

  4
The ranking is based on a scoring system that ranks irreversible
effects worse than reversible ones,  and life-threatening effects
worse than structural  or functional  ones.  This reflects a
difference in public perception of severity of effects.   This
ranking is a "crude approximation."
                           Source:   National  Research  Council,
                            Strategies  to  Determine  Needs  and
                            Priorities  for Toxicity  Testing,
                            Volume  2;   Development,  Washington,
                            D.C:  National  Academy  Press,  1982,
                            p.  37.

-------
                             -174-
 particular toxic  susceptibilities of the aged.  Exposure profiles
 will  change as more  people work and are active  in their later
 years.
      Differing susceptibility to toxic effects  is a firmly estab-
 lished  characteristic of age.  (56)  Aging is associated, for
 instance,  with generally decreased ability to resist mutagens via
 natural  DNA repair mechanisms.  Current research into the biology
 of  aging may reveal  substances which hasten or  delay the aging
 process, perhaps  creating a new descriptor of toxicity:  geronto-
 genesis.
 Birth Defects
     A  combination of social, medical, and economic factors are
 increasing the concern over the causes and occurrence of birth
 defects.  As more women enter the workforce, as mothers delay
 childbearing, and as more is learned about effects of chemicals on
 pre- and post-natal  development, reproduction teratology will gain
 in  significance.
     •   Over 15 million Americans suffer from one or more types
         of birth defects, 80% of which are thought to be caused
         by heritable genetic factors.
     •   Fifty percent of all miscarriages and at least 40% of all
         infant deaths are attributed to genetic factors.
     •   Nearly 3,000 genetic diseases have already been identi-
         fied and catalogued.
     •   The  life-years lost to these diseases are estimated to be
         six and a half times as many as those lost to heart
         disease.   (57)
     These  are essentially all  due to genetic factors present in
 the population.   However, environmental factors and mutagens, in
 particular, may exacerbate birth defects  or cause non-heritable
 ones of  their own.
     We  have limited knowledge  of the natural  base rate of muta-
 tions in humans  and the cumulative effects  of various mutagens in
 the environment.   Mutation is  essential to  the survival  of a
 species, allowing for flexibility and adaptation while being
overwhelmingly harmful  or deadly  to  most  individuals.

-------
                               -175-
      In most cases, the relative contributors of "natural" back-
 ground mutation and mutation caused by anthropogenic factors cannot
 be distinguished.
      "The bottom line in all of this discussion is that
      we have a substantial amount of evidence to believe
      that cancer is like almost every other human disease
      we know of — that is, it is due to the exposure of
      a susceptible individual to a specific environmental
      agent.  Therefore, it is probably reasonable to
      contend that close to 100 percent of human cancers
      are environmentally induced and at the same time
      that close to 100 percent of human cancers are
      influenced by host factors." (58)
      Scientific studies on changing rates of birth defects are
 conflicting; most point toward a significant increase in reported
 birth defects.  However, they disagree as to whether this repre-
 sents an increased susceptibility to birth defects or merely the
 heightened medical and public awareness.  Rising public sensi-
 tivity to physical and behavioral abnormalities may be a signifi-
 cant  factor, so that mild afflictions that might previously have
 gone  unnoticed are now linked to genetic abnormalities.  Data from
 a National Health Interview Survey show a 15% increase in the
 number of American school  children enrolled in some form of special
 education since 1975.  (59)  It is not clear whether this number
 represents a real  increase in need,  increased resources for special
 education, or a lowered threshold of concern.
      Improved medical  care, especially oeonatal  intensive care,
 health care and nutrition during pregnancy, and fetal monitoring
 and screening, is improving the general  health of both mother and
 child and perhaps reducing susceptibility to genetic or environ-
mental sources of birth defects.   However,  the significantly
 increased survival  rate of premature and underweight babies, more
 likely to have birth defects, partly counteracts this.   Environ-
mental factors, both natural  and anthropogenic,  have been linked
 to birth defects.   Increasing amounts of toxic substances in the
workplace, cigarette smoking, and viruses and bacteria  all  have

-------
                              -176-
been  linked to birth defects.  The importance of these factors  in
causing birth defects is unknown.
      A study of  10,000 babies  conducted by Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity  indicated  that these factors cancelled each other out.- (60)
      All agree that public sensitivity to birth defects is on  the
rise.  This concern will translate into increased political pres-
sure  to identify and eliminate the causes of birth defects, with
an emphasis on man-made causes -- such as toxic substances.
4.  Exposure, Environment, and Risk:  New Sources of Concern
      Better data collection and processing for state-of-the-
environment assessment are needed on:
      •  the natural or existing background levels of chemicals,
        especially in geographical areas subject to future
        development;
      •  the types and concentrations of chemicals normally
        present in the human body; and
      •  the effects of environmental chemicals and associated
        stimuli (such as vibration, noise, heat) on the human
        body.
Natural  Versus Man-Made Hazards
      Differing perceptions of natural vs.  man-made toxic agents
will  shape the thrust of research and regulation on toxic sub-
stances.   Advances in biochemistry and environmental  science are
likely to uncover more and more "natural"  toxins which will have to
be incorporated into toxicology testing regimes  and risk assessment.
Naturally occurring toxins include estrogen, which apparently is a
significant contributor to breast cancer,  and the alkaloid solanine,
a neurotoxin found in sub-toxic concentrations in potatoes.   (61)
Pervasive Environmental  Contaminants
     As  waste management handling improves and point-source con-
tamination from waste sites decreases, toxic contamination from
accidents and non-point sources will  rise  in relative importance.
     On  a broader level, this anticipated  shift  in emphasis from
point to  non-point sources  of environmental  contamination may be
expected  to broaden the  scope of regulation  of industrial  chemi-

-------
                               -177-
cals to include lower-level, more dispersed exposure from by-
products, consumer use, inert ingredients, contaminants of
products, etc.  (62)
     Non-industrial sources of toxic substances, such as the
generation of polycyclic organic matter from residential wood
burning, will be a growing contributor, relatively, to the total
toxic load on the environment.  These more dispersed sources will
be more difficult and costly to monitor, control, and regulate.
Indoor Air Pollution
     The movement to energy conservation is likely to result in
better insulation and lower rates of turnover of air inside struc-
tures.  One consequence of that is an increase in indoor pollu-
tants, including carbon monoxide, from domestic toxic materials.
Especially troublesome sources are:   gas stoves and other appli-
ances, kerosene heaters, wood stoves and fireplaces, cigarette
smoke, and formaldehyde insulation.   Radon from rock, sand, and
concrete used in construction is a recognized problem.  Recent re-
search indicates health problems resulting from inhaling sodium
dodecyl sulfate, an anionic detergent used in carpet shampoos. (63)

C.  TRENDS IN MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS
     The end use of most chemicals is products and materials.  New
materials result from improvement or replacement of existing mate-
rials (as plastics replace wood in construction) or from new
markets which require new sorts of products and materials (such as
the semiconductor industry).
     Overarching trends in materials science, reflecting a new
emphasis on optimizing use, are towards:
     •  substitution, especially of  non-metals for metals;
     •  increased durability;
     t  improved cost-effectiveness  and energy efficiency;
     •  minimal  environmental and health hazards; and
     •  maximum recycling potential.

-------
                               -178-
      Interest in conservation has also spurred research in surface
science and in synthetic materials which combine abundant elements
(such as silicon and carbon) to replace limited or non-renewable
materials such as metals.
     Materials are increasing in complexity.  This will alter the
product mix of the chemical industry and could increase the  like-
lihood of toxic hazard from use, exposure to, combustion, or dis-
posal of such complex materials.
     Specific materials science innovations are highlighted below
under the headings metals and alloys, polymers (plastics and
rubbers), ceramics, composites, telematics-related materials, and
energy-related materials.  Trends in biomedical materials and bio-
technology-engendered materials are discussed in other sections of
this paper.
1.  Metals and Alloys
     Process improvements in manufacturing are enabling metallur-
gists to alter the microscopic structures  of metals and alloys.
Rapid solidification produces amorphous glassy metals with high
heat and corrosion resistance and good paramagnetic qualities.
These materials are the foundation of many performance advances in
the aerospace industry and will probably find application in pol-
lution control technology.   (64)
2.  Surface Science and Catalysis
     Corrosion is the source of unwanted deterioration and failure
of materials.   Surface science priorities  include reducing corro-
sion in all materials and minimizing waste of resources and energy.
     -- New coatings are combining lubrication with corrosion
        resistance.
     -- Lasers are being increasingly turned to surface modifi-
        cation through precise,  metal-thrifty cladding, alloying,
        hardening, and melting.
     -- Ion beams can lay down coatings 1000 times  thinner than
        traditional  platings.   Ion implantation creates thin
        layers of corrosion-resistant surface alloys.    (65)

-------
  -179-
 TRENDS IN U.S. CONSUMPTION OF PLASTICS AND KEY METALS. 1960-1985
Source:  The Center for Integratlve Studies, Facts and Trends,
1979. p. 18.
 3.   Polymers,  Plastics,  and Synthetic Rubbers
      Plastics  are  rapidly replacing metals in many applications;
 the  biggest  markets  are  packaging, housing, construction, and
 transportation.   (66)                   EXHIBIT  28
 The  first  high-volume
 plastic-bodied car,  the
 1984 Pontiac Fiero,  con-
 tains 300  pounds of  plas-
 tics, twice  the typical
 amount.   (67)   Process
 improvements are increas-
 ing  the energy-efficiency
 of plastics  and hastening
 their use.   Plastics  and
 synthetic  rubbers  are
 direct petrochemical  products;  research into coal-based polymers
 is just beginning.   As overseas competition in basic plastics
 like polystyrene grows,  the U.S. is switching to  specialty
 products.   (68)
 4.   Ceramics and Other Inorganic Materials
     High-technology  ceramics,  especially silicon ceramics, are
 stable at  extremely  high temperatures;  applications under inves-
 tigation include turbines,  heat exchangers, and energy-conver-
 sion  (such as  synfuels production).  (69)   The field is the focus
of unrestrained enthusiasm  of materials scientists.
 5.   Composites
     As their  name indicates, composites combine materials from
almost all other classes.   The  general  structure is a reinforcing
 fiber -- graphite, glass, ceramic,  i.e., -- distributed in a
matrix -- often a  polymer,  or perhaps  a metal.  A presently com-
mon  composite  material is fiberglass,  in which thin threads of
glass act as a strengthening material  in a matrix of epoxy.  In
the  future scores  of  materials  may  be  used as the base or matrix

-------
                               -180-
and scores of materials as the reinforcing fibers.  These will
have different properties and characteristics, new uses, and un-
known health and environmental effects.
     The materials in new high strength composite materials may
include not only fibers or carbon, but beryllium, quartz, and new
forms of fiberglass.  The environmental problem is that as they
are used, recycled, or destroyed by combustion, fibers may be re-
leased to the environment.  The very small particles may create
diseases analogous to black lung, asbestosis, and other problems
known to occur from the inhalation of fibrous material.   (70)
Improperly disposed products degrade very slowly, potentially
creating leaching problems, of especial concern with such products
as boron fibers and metal whiskers.  An EPA-sponsored mini-assess-
ment of composites reported no significant health hazards in use
or recycling but did call for further research on the effects of
combustion of these materials.   (71)
   --A recent example stems from the use of a new high strength
     material based on carbon fibers imbedded in epoxy matrix in
     high performance aircraft.   A fire released a large number
     of these carbon fibers in the smoky plume from the burning
     aircraft.   The fibers are electrically conductive; the
     smoky plume settling on electric motors and other elec-
     trical  equipment unexpectedly caused a large number of
     electrical shorts.   This highlights the importance of subtle
     side effects with regard to new technologies.  (72)
6.  Telematics-Related Materials
     The high-growth computer and telecommunications  industries
rely on extremely high value-added products.   The field is still
in its infancy; expansion and evolution of new products are likely
to maintain  a growth rate near the 13-15% a year of electronic
chemicals.   (73)   The lifecycle -- especially disposal — of
telematics  devices  may present future environmental  health
hazards.
     --  The  shift to electronic  storage, processing,  and
        transmission of information is  fueling a 35%  a year

-------
                                     -181-
        expansion  in  the market for magnetic storage media  (such
        as  floppy  disks.   (74)

        The performance  reliability advantages of fiberoptics  over
        electric lines  is encouraging development of optical
        glasses  and  fibers
        which  are  already
        finding  applica-
        tions  in other
        markets  such as
        medicine.   (75)
        The special  en-
        vironmental  needs
        of telematics
        equipment  demand
        sensors  with new
        piezoelectric and
        thermoelectric
        materials.   Qual-
            EXHIBIT 29
    Burgeoning uses of chemicals
      and plastics in electronics
 Market
                  1982    1987
                  (Million dollar?)
 Semiconductors     $750 $1.500
 Passive components   250   400
 Printed wiring boards  650   900
 Photovoltaici     	§0   320

                $1,710 $3,120
  Annual
growth (avg.)

   15%
   10
    7
   40

   13%
   Source: Chemicalweek. "Electronic Chemicals:
L-  Everyone Is scrambling for a piece of the action,"
   April 20. 1983. p. 32.
        ity control  technology and management will be a vital,
        generic  prerequisite to production and use of all  these
        materials.

     — A  1983 California survey showed that 36 of 40 underground
        storage  tanks  in the Silicon Valley area were leaking poten-
        tially toxic materials.  These storage tanks were  the
        depositories/repositories for the many chip manufacturing
        and electronics firms in the area.  At the Fairchild plant
        in San Jose, workers discovered that a faulty storage tank
        had discharged some 58,000 gallons of mildly carcinogenic
        solvent  trichloroethane into the underground water supply„ (76)
     — A  1980 survey  by the California Department of Industrial
        Relations  found that the semiconductor industry had 1.3
        illnesses  per  100 workers, compared with 0.4 per 100 wor-
        kers  for general manufacturing industries,,  Compensation
        data  from  1980 to 1982 show that almost half (46.9%) of
        all occupational illnesses among semiconductor workers  in
        California  resulted from exposure to toxic materials, more
        than  twice  the incidence of illnesses from toxic exposures
        among workers  in other manufacturing industries.   (77)

7.  Energy-Related  Materials

     The continuing search for diverse energy technologies and
sources is creating needs for new materials.  Use of lower grade

crude oils is spurring the development of new catalysts such as

zeolites.   (78)  The  search for high-temperature superconductors

has spawned a new class of materials known as molecular conduc-

tors, including  polymers such as polyacetylene and crystalline

salts of metals  such as platinum.    (79)

-------
                               -182-
 Enhanced Oil Recpv_ejry_
     Chemical agents, including surfactants, polymers, carbon
 dioxide, modified starches, and salts are being injected under-
 ground on a massive scale to increase oil recovery.   Injection
 rates may reach 100 billion pounds per year by 1985,  The environ-
 mental fate and long-term effects of such large-scale chemical
 infusions are unknown.  (80)
 Batteries
     Deployment of batteries as energy storage devices would in-
 crease the occurrence of lead, cadmium, sulfur, nickel, or other
 materials not now generally deployed in the environment in large
 quantities.  If the electric car becomes a substantial fraction of
 the auto fleet, this growth in battery manufacture, use, and dis-
 posal could be substantial.  The materials used in batteries are
 almost universally toxic to humans and biota.  Further problems
 could arise from the large-scale use of batteries  in  hearing aids,
 calculators, computers, radios, and other portable devices.   (81)
 Photovoltaics
     Fast-paced technical advances in the design and manufacture
 of photovoltaic energy systems have made specialized applications
 economical and are making massive deployment of photovoltaics
 inevitable.  (82)  The combination of extensive, dispersed appli-
 cation of new materials in photovoltaics could create a new, per-
 vasive toxicity problem.
     Although forecasts differ in their pacing of photovoltaic
 penetration of the electricity market,  all  agree that the 1990's
will find economic photovoltaics  filling 20-30% of the electricity
 demand.   This scale of use implies the annual manufacture of
 literally millions of individual  photovoltaic cells.   (83)
     Exposure to toxic substances could occur during mining and
manufacture, from occupational  exposure to toxic gases or dusts,
 from malfunction or accidental  exposure (say through a residential
fire),  during system use, from wastes  from mining and manufacture,
or from disposal  of photovoltaic  systems at the end of the product
 lifecycle.   Fire toxicity is a  special, unquantified concern for
photovoltaics.

-------
                               - IBS-
      General ly, many of the materials and to a lesser extent the
 processes used in photovoltaic manufacturing are similar to those
 of  the semiconductor electronics industry.  While the semiconduc-
 tor industry has in its short lifetime recorded no significant
 occupational or environmental incidents, the long-term potential
 both  for occupationally-related risks and for waste disposal
 problems has not been systematically explored.
      The materials used in photovoltaics fall into three basic
 categories:  photovoltaic semiconductor materials such as doped
 silicon, ceramic and polymer support materials, and the glasses
 used  to enclose the photovoltaic cells.  Mining, purification,
 manufacture, widespread use, and final disposal and dispersal of
 these materials all might present new hazards.
      —Gallium arsenide can give rise to volatilized arsenic
        and the highly toxic arsenic trioxide during a fire.
      --Silicon dopants such as 'boron trichloride and phosphine
        are known as toxic agents.  They are used in very small
        concentrations in the silicon-based photovoltaic cell,
        about one part per million. .
      --Other potential photovoltaic materials include germanium,
        cadmium (as cadmium sulfide),  indium, antimony,
       'and copper sulfate — almost universally bad actors.
      --Many specialized ceramics, glasses, and non-conductive
        polymers are being developed specifically for photovoltaic
        applications.   It is likely that different materials will
        be manufactured for different  applications, say residential
        versus centralized utility.  More well-known polymers
        such as polymethyl methacrylate and polyvinyl  chloride
        are also being used and modified for photovoltaics.  (84)
     The broad range of potential  applications of photovoltaics
will disperse these materials throughout society.  Photovoltaics
are already economical  for many stand-alone or remote operations,
such as boat and train batteries,  portable  clocks, calculators,
remote village electricity generation, and field communications.
In the near future extensive residential  application is likely,
and further down the road grid-connected, central utility use can
be expected.  Regional  energy needs and economics will  determine

-------
                              - 184-
th e speed and extent of photovoltaic adoption and consequently
the patterns of potential toxic exposure.

8.  Agricultural Chemicals
     Agricultural chemicals as such do not fall  under the regula-
tory purview of OTS, although the office does have responsibility

for chemicals used as intermediates in pesticide manufacture.   The
future of agricultural  chemicals is closely tied to that of com-
mercial chemicals under TSCA, for several reasons:

     — Agricultural chemicals -- pesticides and fertilizers --
        are a continuing, highly visible, political  and regu-
        latory issue.  Their production, use and misuse, inter-
        national trade, disposal, and environmental  dispersal  all
        involve politically potent issues; the resolution of these
        will unavoidably affect policy on other  classes of chemi-
        cals and health hazards.
     — Pesticides and  fertilizers are a significant source of the
        chemical load on the environment; they create degradation
        products which  can interact with other chemicals in the
        soil, water, and biota.   Neither industrial  toxic chemi-
        cals or agricultural chemicals should be regulated in  iso-
        lation.  Organochlorine residues from such  pesticides  as
        Chlordane, Aldrin, DDT, and heptachlor have been found in
        over 90% of people tested, representative of the general
        population.   (85)
     -- The technology  of agricultural chemicals analysis is quite
        advanced and can, in some cases, provide lessons
        for other classes of chemicals.    Some areas of concern
        particularly relevant to OTS missions and toxic substances
        are the array of new biology-based technologies and the
        misuse of agricultural chemicals.
     -- Both accidental and deliberate misuse of pesticides and,
        to a lesser extent, fertilizers, is extensive.  (86) A
        USDA survey in  Nebraska found that one-third of pesticide
        applicators  used faulty equipment or techniques.  (87)
        State oversight of npsticide use, disposal,  and health
        impacts varies  widely, and may leave gaps in monitoring or
        enforcement of  government regulation.  Public,  industry,
        and regulatory  response to incidents or  trends  in toxic
        exposures  will  affect the political  and  regulatory climate
        for all toxic substances.

     -- The many biology- and biochemistry-based pesticides which
        are replacing traditional  chemical  pesticides hold the
        promise of substantially reducing the amount of chemicals

-------
                               -185-
        needed in agriculture.  These include allelopathic chemi-
        cals, natural herbicides produced by plants or microbes;
        social insecticides, which interfere with the normal
        social patterns of pests; microbial insecticides,
        naturally produced by bacteria, viruses, and fungi; and
        biological pesticides, which target pests with natural
        predators or parasites.  (88)  The imminent widespread use
        of these new technologies could substantially alter the
        profile of chemicals released to the environment.  They
        could raise new concerns about the toxic effects of
        artificially-produced molecules and organisms dispersed
        on a very broad scale throughout the environment.  (A
        recent suit brought in 1983 to block the use of a
        genetically-engineered bacterium to prevent frost forma-
        tion on potatoes marked both the first  proposed  field
         use  of genetically engineered organisms and the  first
         corresponding  leqal protest.)


D.  TELEMATICS (TELECOMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION TECH-
    NOLOGIES)

     The convergence of computers and communication technologies
is of fundamental and revolutionary importance to all  areas of
science and technology and to all areas of public health and en-
vironmental management (see Exhibit 30 below).   (These technologies
are also treated in Chapter 3, Section B.3, Product Trends in the
Domestic Chemicals Industry.)

     The ability  to assimilate and manipulate complex  systems
interrelationships is  making  computers invaluable in  modeling
such systems as:
     — the environment surrounding a  proposed waste site;
     -- movement  and transformation of chemicals in the environ-
        ment;

     -- pharmacokinetic transformation of compounds within the
        human body;

     -- the links between chemical  structure and biological
        activity;

     -- complex,  multiphase reaction pathways  in chemical manu-
        facture.

     Possible applications of  data  management particularly rele-

vant to chemicals are:

-------
                                -186-
                           EXKIBIT  30
                 BIOMEDICAL  TELEMATICS INSTRUMENTS

Loca t i On
Subcutaneous






Su percutaneous





Percutaneous





Transcutaneous








Research
Microelectronics
for totally
implantable
telemetry of
flow, pressure.
and dimension.
for example
Mlcrotransducers
for animal back-
pack telemetry
of flow and
pressure, for
example
Implantable
biopotential
and temperature
mlcrotransducers
with exter-
nalized leads
Gamma ray micro-
transducer
arrays for
radlolsotope
Imaging; blood
pressure sensor
array with
plezoreslstive

Diagnostic
Totally
implantable
telemetry for
coronary by-
pass graft
monitoring

Ingestible
pH telemetry
capsule



Catheter-tip
blood gas
sensor



Computerized
X-ray
tomography
detector
arrays



Function
Monitoring
Cerebral pres-
sure telemetry
mlcrotransducers
and electronics



Ambulatory care
ECG telemetry
with active
microelectronics


Transvenous
pacing lead for
monitoring and
stimulation;
catheter-tip
pressure sensor
Piezoelectric
transducer
arrays for
ultrasonic
imaging; blood
gas monitor
raicrosensors


Therapeutic
Hicroelectrodes
*or neural
stimulator for
pain rel ief



Hicroelectrodes
and electronics
for bladder
stimulator


Electrical
stimulation of
bone for en-
hanced healing


Microtemperdturc
sensors for
hyperthermia;
microsensors for
defibril l,i tors




Prosthetic
Cardiac pace-
maker micro-
electronics:
auditory
prosthesis
microelectronics

Hearing aid





Microsensors
for left
ventricle
assist drive


Microoutica)
sensors and
tactile
stimulators for
optical -to-
tactile readina
jid for the
hi i"d
   Extracutaneous Electron
             mlcrmcnpp
Mass spectro- Miniature
meter, cell   silicon qas
sorter      chroma t«i|raph
          for breath
          analysis
Microsensors for
kidney dialvsi'.
Voice-actuated
wheelchair
:'nn f ro I lor
        Compilation of a comprehensive  national epidenn'oloyical
        database,  beginning as a matter of course at birth;  and
        accumulating information on health, occupation, lifestyle,
        and  family up until cause of  death.  The newly developed
        National  Death Index takes one  step towards this.  (89)

        Coordination of the existing  toxicology databases such as
        RTECS  (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical  Substances),
        TOXLINE, CANCERLINE, The Toxicology Data Bank, EMIC  (Environ-
        mental Mutagen Information Center), AGRICOLA,  and EPB
        (Environmental  Periodicals Bibliography).   (90)
     Comprehensive data on chemicals  throughout the lifecycle  is

becoming  increasingly accessible to all  levels of users  through

increased networking and lowered cost.   The Chemical Substances
Information Network (CSIN), a project of the Interagency Toxic
Substances Data  Committee, has achieved  a  high level of  integra-^

tion and completeness by linking over 200  autonomous specialized

-------
                              -187-
data bases into a single universal library.  (91)   The data bases
linked through CSIN cumulatively provide information on chemical
nomenclature, composition, structure, properties, toxicity, pro-
duction, uses, health and environmental effects, and regulation.
The central access hub of CSIN allows users to access a wide range
of information relevant to a single chemical or issue in a single
procedure, overcoming such problems as the listing of chemicals
under different names in different data bases.
     -- The smart card, a wallet-sized storehouse of personal
        information such as medical records, resumes, and finan-
        cial transactions, could provide a useful tool for epi-
        demiology or occupational exposure records.
     -- Real-time tracking of chemical transport (with the help of
        satellite observation) can help avoid or mitigate acci-
        dents during natural hazards and provide information on
        traffic, accidents, and safety along shipping routes.
        (See Chapter 3.C.2.)
     The microprocessor, so-called brain on a chip,  will become a «.
tool for wide-scale, low-cost, highly complex, monitoring and
evaluation of the natural environment, the workplace, and the home.
The ability of low-cost microprocessors to afford independent,
free-standing monitoring of large numbers of parameters in the
environment will become the basement knowledge for improved environ-
mental management.  (92)  The smart card, and increased monitoring
in general, will clearly raise issues of privacy and civil rights.
This will include, although it will certainly not be limited to,
monitoring of the environment.
     Telematics is restructuring soci-al systems such as work (with
flextime and remote terminals), transportation (teleconferencing
replaces some travel), education, health care (with  remote diag-
nosis  via telematics), population distribution (decentralization),
recreation (video games), and computer crime.    These changes
will,  in turn, broadly affect the social environment of produc-
tion,  use, and exposure to chemicals.   The home could become a
concern for occupational safety and health if significant numbers
of workers shift towards part-time or full-time work at home.   (93)

-------
                               -188-
 E.   BIOTECHNOLOGY AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
      Recent  advances in molecular biology have created an entirely
 new  set of tools for man, tools whose potential has barely begun
 to be realized.  Applications are emerging not only in the produc-
 tion of chemicals, but in the manufacture of almost all goods and
 in the control of the environment.
      The term biotechnology encompasses a group of related tech-
 nologies based on converging advances in immunology, molecular
 biology, and microbiology.  The key technique is recombinant DNA
 manipulation -- the ability to identify, isolate, and transfer a
 gene coding  for a particular protein, and then recombine it with
 the  genes of a foreign cell.  Given suitable growth conditions,
 this  cell will then express its newly acquired gene by producing
 the  protein  for which the new gene codes.  Biotechnology Jias
 enabled the production of human insulin by transferring the human
 gene  for insulin to a yeast cell, which in culture will produce
 large  amounts of human insulin indistinguishable from that pro-
 duced  in the human body.
      Since DNA, the basic constituent of genes, is universal to
 all  living organisms, in theory any gene could be transferred to
 any  other organism.   In practice, however, significant barriers
 remain because of the complex differences in cellular mechanisms
 for  control of gene expression.
     The other new tool  of biotechnology is the production of
 monoclonal  antibodies (MAbs) through cell fusion.   Antibodies are
 produced by human cells  in response to foreign molecules -- such
 as flu virus proteins —  that enter the body.   They are unique
 in their high specificity and high affinity for particular sub-
 stances.   Extremely homogeneous preparations of MAbs can be made
which are similarly specific and will  bind tightly and exclusively
 to a single substance.   Potential  applications include:
     -- preparation of extremely pure vaccines;

-------
                               -189-
     -- purification (for example, by passing .a dilute solution of
        a desired product over a column of MAbs specific for that
        product);
     -- diagnosis (highly sensitive MAbs are already being used to
        track down proteins associated with cancer in the body);
     -- detection and analysis;
     — therapy.
     Paralleling the development of these laboratory techniques
have been engineering techniques for handling biological and bio-
chemical products -- cells, proteins, DNA, membranes, enzymes,
hormones, and other proteins, etc. -- in a variety of settings.
The generic new capabilities provided by these biotechnologies are
changing the pharmaceutical and chemical industries, revolutionizing
traditional agriculture, affecting medical technologies and envi-
ronmental detection and monitoring technologies.   (94)
     The application of biotechnology creates new processes for
production of existing products as well  as for producing entirely
new ones.  The growth of a new industry based on  biotechnology
entails the development of new feedstocks, process engineering,
control systems, testing, and waste disposal  techniques.  Some
active areas of research in bioprocess engineering include:
     -- development and improvement of engineering for continuous
        bioprocessing systems, such as the fluidized-bed biological
        reactor;
     -- immobilized enzymes and cells (biocatalysts), using tech-
        niques including microencapsulation,  entrapment in a
        polymer matrix, and adsorption to a physical substrate.  (95)
Industry trends in this area are discussed in Chapter  3.C.
     Biotechnology is now being used primarily for low-volume
specialized products.  So far, scale-up  of bioprocesses has proven
to be expensive and technically difficult.  Current and near-term
applications include:
     — Pharmaceuticals, where the high  value-added, low-volume
        preparation of biologicals such  as insulin provides a
        natural area of application for  biotechnology;

-------
                               -190-
     -- specialty chemicals, such as ami no acids, enzymes,
        vitamins, and steroids;
     -- pollution cleanup and waste management, where mixtures
        of micro-organisms can be used:to neutralize or digest
        undesirable waste products;
     -- microbial mining, using bacteria which naturally
        concentrate heavy metals;
     — single-cell protein production, primarily for animal
        feed; and
     — microbial enhanced oil recovery.
     The principles and techniques of biotechnology can be applied
to industrial processes in different ways according to the product
or process desired.
     -- Isolated enzymes or enzyme  complexes can catalyze a
        single specific reaction, such as the conversion of
        glucose to fructose in the production of high-fructose
        corn syrup.
     « Micro-organisms (bacteria, fungi, and yeasts, primarily)
        can be cultured for high-volume production of basic cell
        matter, as in the production of single cell  protein or
        baker's yeast.
     — Mixtures of micro-organisms, genetically engineered or
        not, can be used for complex processes such as waste
        conversion or the production of ethanol.  Standard sewage
        treatment uses  micro-organisms in this manner.
     — Micro-organisms that have been genetically engineered
        can be used to  produce and collect a  desired gene product
        such as interferon, hormones, and growth regulators.
     Biotechnology and  bioprocess engineering offer distinct advan-
tages and disadvantages in comparison with traditional manufacturing
processes. (96)
     -- In some cases,  biotechnology can provide a product that
        otherwise could not be obtained, as with human insulin.
     -- Biotechnology takes advantage of the  complex biological
        systems produced by nature to provide pre-packaged
        conversion systems.
     -- Reaction conditions for biological  processes are usually
        mild (atmospheric pressures, low temperatures less than
        160°F) compared to standard manufacturing processes.  The
        occupational  hazards of the new biotechnology industries
        will  likely be  quite different from those of the current
        organic chemical  industry.

-------
                               -191-
     -- The inherent instability of biological organisms and
        processes makes quality control vital to bioprocess
        engineering.  Even with modern monitoring and control
        systems, a genetically engineered organism may sponta-
        neously revert or mutate, in rare cases rendering it
        ineffective or possibly toxic,
     -- Biological processes create new waste problems, requiring
        disposal and treatment of large volumes of wastewater
        and biocatalysts.
     --.In some cases, biotechnology may solve problems much
        more cheaply than other methods.  Bacteria have been
        engineered to prevent the crystallization of frost that
        bacteria normally initiate on potatoes. (97)   Standard
       . approaches to prevent subsequent crop damage, such as
        smudge pots and heaters, are more expensive.
     -- Recombinant DMA technology is more selective and specific
        than traditional chemical mutation techniques used in the
        fermentation industry.
     Biotechnology is making new feedstocks technically and econom-
ically feasible for organic chemical production.  As  the use of
biotechnology grows, this difference in feedstocks will alter the
entire industrial flow cycle, from mining and harvest to transport,
process engineering, and waste disposal.  New product mixes will
emerge.  Old feedstocks, especially petroleum products, will slowly
be displaced.   This shift to new processes and products will change

occupational and consumer exposure to toxic substances, and alter
the release of potentially toxic substances to the environment
from industrial processes.
     -- Biotechnology is now primarily using feedstocks such as
        corn starch and beet molasses that have an established
        production infrastructure for reliable supply, cost, and
        quality control.  In theory, any organic chemical  can be
        produced by either chemical  or organic synthesis from
        any carbon source.

     -- Lignocellulose from wood and woody plants is  a potentially
        plentiful source of carbon,  but there is now a lack of
        cheap efficient mechanisms for conversion to  glucose and
        a strong competing demand from energy and forest products
        markets.
     -- Petroleum and coal are also  potential biotechnology feed-
        stocks.  Pfizer operates a citric acid plant  that can use
        either molasses or refined hydrocarbons. (98)  The existing

-------
                               -192-
        capital and plant investment in the traditional petro-
        chemical industry will likely prevent any significant
        utilization of  biomass as a  feedstock in the near  term.
     -- Agricultural products and by-products are currently used
        for the majority of industrial biotechnology production.
     -- Industrial, agricultural, and municipal  wastes  so far
        have found little use as a feedstock for biotechnology.
     There has been as yit no comprehensive study of the applica-
bility of present toxicity testing to biocatalysts, or  to products
and wastes of industrial biotechnology.  While many processes are
using natural biological materials that apparently are  non-toxic,
there may be an increasing need for new toxicologies!  regimes for
biotechnological processes.

-------
                               -193-
                            REFERENCES

                             Chapter 3
 1.   U.S. Department of Commerce, 1983 U.S.  Industrial  Outlook.
      Jananuary 1983, p. 9-11.

 2.   Thomas O'Brien, NBS and Industrial  Biotechnology:  Technical
      Developments and~Future Measurement Needs,  NBS Planning
      Report 12, NBSIR 82-2549, July 1982, p.  10.

 3.   Chemicalweek,  "Forecast 1984," January  4,  1984,  p.  30„

 4.   J. F. Coates, Inc., International Lonq-Ranqe Trends  Affect-
      ing the Business Environment, Washington,  D.C., January 3,  1983.

 5. .  Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN), "Facts  and Figures for
      the Chemical Industry," June 13, 1983, p.  54.

 6.   Thomas O'Brien, NBS and Industrial  Biotechnology,  p.  12.

 7.   C&EN, "World Chemical  Outlook," December 19, 1983, p.  29.

 8.   C&EN, "Facts and Figures for the Chemical  Industry,"  June 13,
      1983, p. 54.

 9.   C&EN, "Big Changes in  Chemical  Firms by  2000," October 11,
      1982, p. 6.

10.   Ibid.

11.   U.So Department of Commerce, 1983 U.S. Industrial  Outlook,
      January 1983, p. 9-8.

12.   _Ibi_d.

13.   Chemical week, "The Comeback Plan of BP Chemicals," July 20,
      1983, pp.  48-49.

14.   Chemical week, "International  Forecast 1983:  Facing up  to
      Another Tough Year," January 19, 1983, pp.  26-28.

15.   C&EN, "World Chemical  Outlook," December 19, 1983, p*  29.

16.   Ibid.

17.   O'Brien, op, cit., pp. 32 ff.

-------
                                -194-
 18o    C&EN,  "Eastern  Canada  Eyed  for  Petrochemicals," January  3,
       T98I,  p.  24.

 19.    Chemicalweek. "Facing  up  to another tough year," January 19,
       1983,  pp.  39-40.

 20.    Ibid. , pp.  37-39.

 21.    Earl Anderson,  "Developing Nations Boost Chemical Exports,"
       C&EN,  August 23, 1982, pp. 26-27.

 22,    David  Webber, "New Chemical Business Recovery May be Very
       Different," C&EN, January 10, 1983, pp. 14-17.

 23.    William J. Storck, "Chemical Producers Face Yet Slower Growth,"
       C&EN.  April 11, 1983, pp. 11-14.

 24.    Chemicalweek. "Forecast 1984," January 4, 1984, pp. 30-41.

 25.    Ibid., pp 32-33.

 26.    C&EN,  "Facts and Figures," June 13, 1983, p. 30,

 27.    Ibid., p. 50.

 28.    Chemicalweek. "Forecast 1984,  January 4,  1984, pp 30-41.

 29.    C&EN,  "Facts and Figures," June 13, 1983, pp.  26-27.

 300    Chemicalweek, "Forecast 1984," January 4, 1984, p.  35.

 31.    Ibid.

 32.    C&EN, "Facts and Figures," June 13, 1983, p. 43.

 33,    B. J. Luberoff,  Technology-Driven Change  in  the Next Decade,
       speech manuscript,  1982,  for example.   Also  NSF, Trends  to
       1982 in Industrial  Support of Basic Research.  NSF 83-302.

 34.   Chemicalweek,  "Between  the plans for R&D  and reality,"
      June 1, 1983,  p. 22.

 35.   Chemicalweek.  "Forecast 1984,"  January 4,  1984,  p.  34.

 36.   Michael Heylin,  "Cooperation in  Chemistry Makes  Progress,"
      C&EN. October 17,  1983,  p.  33.

37.   National  Science Board,  Science  Indicators 1982. Washington, D.C.:
       U.S. GPO, 1983,  Table 4-8, p.  284,

-------
                               -195-
'38.    Ibid., p. 284.

39«    O'Brien, op. cit.

40.    Drawn largely from Chemical week, "Scale-Up: New Challenges....
       More Powerful Techniques," July 13, 1983, pp. 34-370

41. ,   Robert G. Healy, America's Industrial  Future: An Environ-
       mental Perspective, An Issue Report from Conservation Founda-
       tion, Washington, D.C., 1982, p. 17.

42.    C&EN, "Texas1 Preeminence in Chemicals is Slipping," March 14,
      T983, p. 18.

43.    Robert Healy, OP. cit.. pp. 16-18;  and A. D. Little, Inca,
      The Chemical Industry; Business Strateenies for the 1980*s.
      T980I

44.    H. Jeffrey Leonard, Are Environmental  Regulations Driving U.S.
       Industry Overseas?  Washington, D.C.:  Conservation Foundation,
       1984.

45.   A comprehensive source of information  onfall aspects of the
      petrochemical industry is The International  Petrochemical
      Report,  published by McGraw-Hill.

46.   National  Science Foundation, "U.S.  Pharmaceutical Industry
      Losing Ground to Foreign  Competition,  NAE Study Shows,"
      Press Release, NSF PR83-53, August  1,  19830

47 „   See Clement Bezold (ed.)  Pharmaceuticals  in  the Year 2000]
      Alexandria, Virginia:  Institute for Alternative Futures,  1983.

48.   J« F«  Coates, Inc.,  Trends Affecting the  Future of the  Fish
      and Wi1dlife Service,  Washington, D.C., January 12,  1983,
      pp. 168-172.

49t   Chemical week, "How Chemical  Designers  will  Work in Three
      Dimensions," March 30, 1983,  ppa 32-36; and  Stephen  Stinson,
      "Institute  Gathers  Chemical  Engineering Data,"  C&EN,
      January  3,  1983,  p.  36.

50.   An excellent and  extensive reference on the  industrial  appli-
      cation of robotics  is: Robert U. Ayers and  Steven M,  Miller,
      Robotics: Applications and Social Implications,  Cambridge:
      Ballinger,  1983.

51    C&EN,  "Chemical  Firms  Rank High  on  Information  Services,"
      April  18,  1983,  p.  18.

-------
                                -196-
 52.  John W. Watson, Alan S.  Goldfard,  and Vivian R.  Aubuchon,
      Waste Generation in the  Organic Chemicals  Industry:  A Future
      Perspective, MITRE Corporation, October 1980,  pp. 7-18.

53.   Chemicalweek, "Restructuring:  How  the Chemical  Industry is
      Building its Future,"  October  26,  1983, pp.  26-62.

54.   Edward W.  Lawless  and  Howard M.  Gadberry,  Forecasting Emerging
      Environmental Problems:  Development  of a Program Plan,  Kansas
      City, Missouri, Midwest  Research Institute,  MRI  Report  5-1710-L,
      May 1978.

55.   Chemicalweek, "Gambling  on  Chemicals  from  Coal Gasification,"
      June 1, 1983, p.  19.

56.   Office of  Technology Assessment, Cpmmercia1_  Biotechnology.
      Washington,  D.C.:  U.S. GPO, 1984.

57.   Joseph F.  Coates,  Implications  of  Biotechnology  for  the National
      Bureau of  Standards. NBS Planning  Report 9,  November 6,  1981.

58.   O'Brien, op.  cit.

59.   Ibid.

60.   Alan Bull, et al.,   Biotechnology: International  Trends  and
      Perspectives, Paris: OECD,  1982, pp.  34-38.

61.   OTA, Commercial  Biotechnology,  p.  244.

62.   Ibid.

62.   O'Brien, op.  cit.

64.   New York Times,  "Hazardous  Waste Tally  Keeps on  Growing,"
      September  4, 1983.

65.   Office  of  Technology Assessment, Technologies and Management
      Strategies for Hazardous Waste Control.  Washington, O.C.:
      U.S.  GPO,  March 1983, pp. 111-133.

66.   Ibid.

67.   Drawn largely from C&EN. "Waste Treatment Firms Handling Less
      Volume," May  31, 1982, p. 320

68,  Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies and Management
     Strategies  for Hazardous  Waste  Control. Washington, D.C.:
     U.S. GPO, March 1983, p.  121.

-------
                               -197-
 69.   Ibid.

 70.   United Nations Environmental Programme, "Industry and
      Environment," Industrial Hazardous Waste Management 4,
      Special  Issue,'1983.

 71.   Samuel Epstein, Lester Brown, and Carl Pope, Hazardous Waste
      in America* San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1982.

 72.   Ronald Alsop, "Widespread Fear of Hazardous Waste Sites
      Thwarts  State and Industry Disposal Plans," Wall Street
      Journal. March 10, 1983.

 73.   Sam Gusman, Konrad von Moltke, Frances Irwin, and Cynthia
      Whitehead, Public Policy for Chemicals: National and Inter-
      national issues, the Conservation Foundation, 1980, pp. 100-102,

 74.   C&EN. "Waste Treatment Firms Handling Less Volume," May 31,
      1"982, p. 32.

 75.   Office of Technology Assessment, Technologies and Management
      Strategies for Hazardous Waste Control. March 1983, p. 6.

 76.   Ibid., p. 5.

 77.   Epstein, et al.,  op. cit., p. 320.
                   •
 78.   Alsop, op cit.

 79.   Environmental  Protection Agency, Office of Public Awareness,
      Environmental  Information, March 1979, p.  1,

 80.   For example, Barnaby J. Feder, "The E.P.A0 Gets Tough on
      Waste," New York Times. December 22, 1980, or Chemicalweek.
      "Learning to cope with RCRA," November 12, 1980, pp« 64-71,

 81.   See Office of Technology Assessment, Habitability of the Love
      Canal  Area: An Analysis of the Technical  Basis for the
      Decision on the Habitability of the Emerging Declaration
     ATea -- ft Technical  Memorandum, Washington, D.C. June 1983;
      and Pete Earley, "Dioxin is Still  a Mystery," Washington Post,
      February 27, 1983.

82.   Samuel Freedman, "Finding New Ways to Destroy Toxic Waste,"
      New York Times.  January 10, 1983,  p. 81.

83.  Chemical week,  "Burning Hazardous Waste: It's Costly, but it
     May be the Best Solution," October 5, 1983, p. 92.

-------
                              -198-
 84.   Epstein, et al., op. cit.

 85.   Edward W. Lawless and Howard M0 Gadberry, op. cit.

 86.   Thomas J. Lueck, "Toxic Waste Disposal," New York Times,
      December 30, 1982, p. 02.

 87.   Office of Technology Assessment, Te c h n o 1 o g i e s and Man a geme n t
      Studies for Hazardous Waste Control. March 1983, p. 6.

 88.   Edward Lawless, of Midwest Research Institute, personal
      communication, August 9, 1983.

 89.   C&EN. "Wastewater Systems Cleaning up Toxics," May 3, 1982,
      p. 6.

 90.   Peat, Marwick, Mitchell  & Co., An Industry Survey of Chemical
      Company Activities to Reduce Unreasonable Risk,  Washington, D0C(
      Chemical  Manufacturers Association, February^Yl, 1983.

 91.   Ibid.

 92.   Ibid.
 93.   Thomas H. Maugh II, "Carcinogens in the Workplace:  Where to
      Start Cleaning up," Science 197, September 23,  1977,  p.  268.

 94.   Chemicalweek, "A Test for Women's Job Rights,"  March  12,
      1980, p.  59.

 95.   Zsolt Harsanyi, Genetic Prophecy:  Bevond the Double  Helix.
      New York: Rawson, Wade, 1981,  p. 1180

 96.   Office of Technology Assessment, The Role of Genetic  Testing
      in the Prevention of Occupational Disease,  April  1983.

 97.   Chemicalweek, "Plant security:  extortion threats  lead to
      rising costs," February 16, 1983, p.  38.

 98.   Chemicalweek, "Liability insurance:  It will  cost  more and
      cover iless," February 2, 1983,  p0 42.

99.   Material  in  this section including the quote is based on
      Douglas McLeod, "EIL Policies  Can Differ Significantly,"
      Busi ness  Insurance, Grain Communications, Inc., November 28,
      1983, and on other articles in  the same issue,  including
      "Grappling with Pollution Insurance," by the same author.

-------
                                -199-
100.    Ibid.

101.    For further details see Norman Berstein, "The Enviro-Chem
       Settlement," Environmental Law Reporter 10402, December 1983C

102.    Chenvi calweek, "Liability Insurance:  It will cost more and
       cover  less," February 2, 1983, p. 430

103.   Ibid.  pp0 42, 44.

104.   Morton Mintz, "Bendectin Manufacturer Ends Production,"
       Washington Post, June 10, 1983, p. Al.

105.   Leslie Cheek, personal communication, November 3, 1983,

106.   Eric Nagle, "RCRA Liability Insurance Rules: Evolution and
       Unresolved Issues," The Environmental Forum 1 (7),
       November 1982, p. 20.
                                                                            J

-------
                                  -200-



                              REFERENCES

                               Chapter 4
  1.      "The Shape of U.S. Population Trends," INTERCOM. The Inter-
         national News Magazine, Population Reference Bureau, May-June,
         1982.  Hereafter cited as INTERCOM.

  2.      Ibid, and Metropolitan Life Statistical Bulletin. January-March 1984.

  3.      "Future Racial Composition of the U.S.," INTERCOM. September-
         October 1982.

  4.      Statistical Abstract of the United States.(hereafter Stat. Abst.)
         1981, Table  36.

  5-      Stat. Abst.   1981, Table  226.

  60      Daniel  Bell, The Comi_ng_ of the Post-1ndustrial  Society. New
         York: Basic Books, Inc.,  1973, p. 14.

  7..      E. B. Parker and Marc Porat, "Analysis of  U.S.  Bureau of Labor
         Statistics Data: Social  Implications of Computer/Telecommun-
         ication Systems," Report  No. 16,  Center for Interdisciplinary
         Research, Stanford University, February 1975.

  8.      Stat. Abst., Tables 636,  640.

  9.     National  Science Board, Science Indicators 1982, Washing-
         ton, D.C. U.S. GPO, 1983, p. 193.  Appendices Table 1-3.

!0.      Stat. Abst., Tables 59, 60.

11.     U.S.  Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,  Current
        Population Reports,  "Marital  Status and Living  Arrangements,"
        Series  P-20,  No. 365, March  1980, Table F.

12.     Philip  L.  Rones, "Moving  to  the Sun:   Regional  Job  Growth,
        1968-1978,"  Monthly  Labor Review, March 1980, p. 14,  U.S.
        Department of Labor  publication.

13.     Population Reference  Bureau,  Population Bulletin 36,  No0  2,
        1982.

14.     "A World  that Grows  More  Crowded,"  U.S. News and World  Report
        August  2,  1982,  p. 48.  Basic  data  from U.N. sources.

15.     U.S.  Council  on  Environmental  Quality and  U.S.  Department  of
        State,  Global  2000 Report to  the  President (hereafter  cited
        as Global  2000), Vol.  1.

-------
                                 -201-
16o    Statistical Abstract, Tables 722-777p; also Bureau of Census,
       Current Population Reports, Consumer Income^ Series P-20.

170    Howard Friedenberg, "Regional Differences in Personal Income
       Growth, 1929-1977," Survey of Current Business, U.S. Dept. of
       Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, BEA 80-74, State
       Projections of Personal Income to the Year 2000, December 9,
       1980; and State Nonfarm Income, Recent Growth Patterns,
       April 1975.

18.    Conservation Foundation, State of the Environment 1982,
       Washington, D.C., 1982, p. 138.

19.    Issues Management, April 11, 1984, p. 4.

200    Conservation Foundation, State of the Environment 1982. p. 425.

21     Findings from a current study on The Future Environmental
       Agenda, for EPA, by J. F. Coates, Inc.,  1982-83, report
       forthcomingo

22.    United Way of America, What Lies Ahead:  A New Look, Environ-
       mental Scanning/Strategic Planning "Development Committee,
       Alexandria, Va., 1983, p. 39.

23.    Chemical  & Engineering News, "Some 3000  PAC's Now Active in
       Elections," January 24, 1983, p. 320

24.    Dale Russakoff, "Getting Out the Green Vote for Friends of
       Nature,"  Washington Post, October 5, 1982; and U.S. News
       and World Report,"""'Issues that Stirred the Public,11 November 15,
       1982, Po  31.

25.    Interviews with officials at the National  Wildlife Federation
       August, 1983, and Directories cited.

26.    Interviews with officials at Friends of  the Earth, Washington,
       D.C., August 1983.

27o    Ibid,

28.    Chemical week, "The Environmental  Activists:  They've Grown
       in Competence,  and They're Working Together," October 19,
       1983, p.  48.

29.    Delmar Blasco,  Governmental  Liaison  Centre,  speech before
       Global Tomorrow Coalition, January 14, 1983.

30.    Chemical week, "The Environmental  Activists:They've Grown
       in Competence,  and They're Working Together,"  October  19,
       1983, p.  52.

-------
                                 -202-


 31.    American Chemical Society, Subcommittee on Environmental
       Improvement, Committee on Chemistry and Public Affairs, Cleaning
       Our Environment: The Chemical Basis For Action, Washington, D.C.:
       American Chemical Society, 1969, pp. 5-6.

 32.    Information about the effects of the legislative veto decision
       is based on discussions with James Aidala and Michael Simpson
       of the Environmental Policy Division of the Congressional Re-
       search Service and James I. Sundquist, Senior Fellow in the
       Governmental Studies Program of the Brookings Institution, and
       on an article by Mr. Sundquist, "The Legislative Veto: A
       Bounced Check," The Brookings Review. Fall 1983, pp. 13 ff.

 33.    A summary of foresight legislation provided by the Congressional
       Clearinghouse for the Future, U.S. Congress, 1983.

 34.    U.S. Council on Environmental Quality, State of the Environment
       1.981. 12th Annual Report.

 35.    Ibid., also Conservation Foundation, State of the Environment
       1982. Chapter 9; and New Scientist, "The U.S. Hits back at
       Government Environmental Policy," November 4, 1982, p. 280.

 36.    Chemical  & Engineering News,  "EPA to Require Waste Dump In-
       surance,11 April 19, 1982, p.6.
                                •-,.
 37.    Chemical  & Engineering News,  "California Setting New Hazardous
       Waste Rules,"  November 29, 1982, pp. 16-17.

 38.    Business  Week.  "When States Talk Tougher than the EPA,"  May 30
       1983, p.  33; and Chemicalweek,  "Panel:  Let the States Do It,"
       April 13, 1983, p.'  15.

 39.    Chemicalweek.  "A Snail's Pace for Waste Site Plans," April 20,
       1983, pp. 27ff.

 40.    Chemicalweek.  "Panel:  Let the States Do It,"  April  13, 1983,
       p.  15.

 41.    See for example,  Gladwin Hill,  "Wide Disparity Found in  Con-
       trol  of Pesticides  Around the Nation,"  New York Times,
       May 6,  1979.

42.    Chemicalweek,  "A Snail's Pace for Waste Site Plans, "April 20,
       1983, pp. 27 ff.

43.    Ibid.

44.    Material  in this  section, unless otherwise cited,  is drawn
       from R.D.  Speer,  State Toxic  Substances Legislation:
       Activities  and  Trends,  prepared for the National  Conference
       of State  Legislatures,  Denver,  Colorado,  and the U.S.  Envi-
       ronmental Protection Agency,  Office of Toxics Integration,
       August 31,  1983,  EPA Grant No.  X810542-01-0.

-------
                                -203-
 45.     Ibid., p. 12.

 46.     Ibid., p. 2fi.

 47.     Ibid., p. 27.

 48.     Samuel S0 Epstein, M0D., Lester 0. Brown, and Carl Pope,
        Hazardous Waste in America.  San Francisco: Sierra Club
        Books, 1982, p. 166.

 49.     Ibid., p. 168.

 50.     Ibid., p. 178.

 51.     Ibid., p. 177.

 52.     David L. Bazelon, U.S. Court of Appeals.  See "Technology,
        Litigation, and Justice," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
        39, November 1983, pp. 10-11.

 53.    Chemica^ & Engineering News, "OSHA Ordered to Issue Ethylene
       Oxide Standard," January 17, 1983, p. 9. Sustained by D.C.
       Circuit Court in Public Citizen Health Research Group v.
       Auchter. 702 F.2d 1150 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

 54.    Washington Post. "Sinister Side of Benzene Key to Case,"
       July 3, 1980.  Philip Shabecoff, "EPA Proposes Rules on Benzene,,...",
       New York Times. December 17, 1983.

 550   "Insulation-Foam Ban Nul 1 ified," New York Times, April 9, 1983, p, 8.

 560    U.S. Council on Environmental Quality, Environmental Qua!ity
       1981, 12th Annual  Report, Washington, D.C. 1982, p. 123*

 57.    Pete Earley, "Dioxin is Still a Mystery," Washington Post,
       February 27, 1983»

 580    Washington Post. "Allied's Kepone Battle, A 'Long, Painful
       Haul,1  " January 13, 1980, A-50

 59.    U.S. Council on Environmental Quality, Environmental Quality
       1979, 10th Annual  Report, Washington, D.C.,  pp.  176-179,

60.    Ember,  Lois, "Legal  Remedies for Toxics Victims  Begin Taking
       Shape," Chemical & Engineering News.  March 28,  1983, p. 16.

61 o    IbicL  p. 15.'.  See also, Edwin Chen,  PBB: An American Tragedy,
        Englewood Cliffs:  Prentice-Hall, 1979.

-------
                                 -204-
 62.     Ibid.

 630'    M.  F.  Silcox  and  J.  Highland,  "History  of  Victim  Compensation
        Science,"  presented  at  a  Scientific  Forum  on an Assessment
        of  the Scientific Knowledge  Base  Related to Victim  Compensa-
        tion,  National  Science  Foundation, Washington, D.C., Janu-
        ary 27-29,  1982.

 64.     Michael  Brown,  Laying Waste: The  Poisoning of America by
        Toxic  Waste Chemicals.  New YorlT:  Pantheon  Books,  1980. p. 327.

 650     Chemical & Engineering  News. "Toxic Tort Case May be at Fron-
        tier of  Legal Doctrine,"  March 28, 1983, p. 13.

 66.     Gail Bingham, "Using Negotiation  Effectively in Resolving
        Environmental Disputes,"  Excerpts from  a training course de-
        veloped  and copyrighted by The Conservation Foundation,
        Washington, D.C.,  1982.

 67.     Conservation Foundation,  Environmenta1  Pispute Resolution,
        Selected Case Studies, Washington, D.C. n.d.

 680     Bingham, op. cit.

 69.     David J. Hudson,  "Mediation Finds Growing  Use in Settling
        Environmental Disputes," Chemical & Engineering News.
        February 14, 1983, pp, 26-27.

 700     Gail Bingham, "Does Negotiation Hold a  Promise for  Regulatory
        Reform?" Resolve,  Quarterly Newsletter  on  Environmental Dispute
        Resolution, Conservation  Foundation, Washington, D.C., Fall 1981.

 71.     Sam Gusman, et al, Public Policy for Chemicals:  National  and
        Inte rna ti onal Is sues, Washington, D.C.: The Conservation
        Foundation, 1980, xii, pp. 6-7.

 72o     David Hanson, "U.S. Gets its Way on Approval  of New Chemicals,"
        Chemical and Enqi neerinq News,  January 24,  1983.

 73.     Nature, "Hazard Export:  A Case  for International  Concern,"
       June 8, 1978, p. 415.

 74.    Sam Gusman, et a!. Public Policy for Chemicals;  National  and
        International  Issues. Washington, D0C.: The Conservation
       Foundation, 1980,  p.  90

75.    Gusman, op. cit..  pp.  116-117.

76.    Gusman, op. cit..  p.  100.

-------
                                 -205-
 770    Gusman, op.  ci t.,  p.  128.

 78,    Material  in  this  section  not  otherwise  cited  is  based  on  recent
        discussion "with Mr.  Robert  Reinstein  of the U.S.  Special  Trade
        Representatives Office, and with  Mr.  S.  Jacob Scherr,  an  attorney
        active in the International Program of  the Natural  Resources
        Defense Council,  and  on an  article  by Mr. Scherr, "Export
        of HAZARDOUS Substances,  a  U.S. Right?",  Interaction,  News-
        letter of the Global  Tomorrow Coalition,  Washington, D.C.,
        Vol.  1, No.  1,  November-December  1981.

 79.    Toxic. Materials Transport  (Business Publishers,  Inc.
        Washington,  D.C.),  Vol. 4,  No. 23,  November 22,  1983.

 80.    Chemical week, "FIFRA  Data Disclosure: Is  It Unconstitutional?",
        March 7,  1984,  pp.  14-16.

 81.    Cass  Peterson,  "Chemical  Industry is  Now  Supporting Adminis-
        tration Proposal  for  Labeling," Washington Post,   Septem-
        ber 19, 1983.  Also,  Martha Hamilton, "New Jersey Label Law for
        Chemicals Stirs Debate,"  Washington Post, August  31, 1983.
        Also..Chenricalweek,  "Communities  Insist on Their  Right to
        Know," September  28,  1983.

 82.    Federal Register  48,  No.  228,  November  25, 1983,  pp. 53280-
        53348.

83.    Chemicalweek. "Worker right to know: The Struggle moves into
       the courts,"  April 18, 1984, pp.  38-44.

84.    Timothy Atkeson, "Toxics Regulation  and  Product Liability:
       Decreasing Exposure in the Workplace,  Increasing Exposure  in
       the Courts,"   13 Environmental  Law Reporter 10418,  December
       1983
85.    Chemical week, "For New Toxicity Data,  Scrutiny with Secrecy,"
       December 8, 1982,  p.  24.

86.    Martha Hamilton, "New Jersey Label Law for Chemicals Stirs
       Debate," Washington Post,  August  31, 1983.

87.    Pete Early, "EPA lets  Trade  Secret Loose in Slip-Up, to
       Firm's Dismay,"  Washington Post,  September 18, 1982.

88.   Chemicalweek,  "The  Environmental Activists: They've Grown
      in Competence, and  They're  Working  Together," October 19,
      1983, pp. 51-52.

89.   Chemical &  Engineering  News,  "Hazardous Wastes  for  the Layman,"
      January 10, 1983, pp.  27-28

-------
                                  -206-
  90.


  91.


  92.
 93.



 94.


 95.
 96.

 97.
 98.

 99.
100.


101.

102.
  Vance Bibliographies,  Pi rectory  of  Envi ronmental  Publ i cati ons ,
  P-345,  October 1979.

  See reference  No.  19.   Ongoing work by  J.  F.  Coates,  Inc.,  for
  EPA.

  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, The  Report  to Congress;
  Waste Disposal  Practices and their  Effects on Groundwater.
  Office  of  Water Supply  and Office of Solid Waste  Management
  Programs,  1977.  Also U.S. Water Resources Council, The
  Nation's Water Resources. 1975-2000, Vol.  1,  Summary,  1978.

  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, Planning Workshops to
  Develop Recommendations  for a Ground Water Protection  Strategy,
  Appendices.  EPA Office  of Drinking  Water, June 1980.

  J.  H. Lehr, "How Much Ground Water  Have We Really Polluted?"
  Ground  Water Monitoring  Review,  Winter, 1982.

  Veronica I. Pye, "Groundwater Contamination in the United States,"
  Workshop on Groundwater  Resources and Contamination in the United
  States, Summary and Papers, National Science Foundation, PRA
  Report  83-12, August 1983, p. 34.

  Ibid,  p. 37.

  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, Computer Printout of
  Disease Outbreaks  Attributed to  Ground  Water  Between  1948  and
  1980.   Compiled and reported in  Pye, op. cit, p.  47.   See  also:
  J.S.  Hubert and L.W. Canter, Health  Effects from  Ground Water
  Usage.  National  Center  for Ground Water Research, Norman,
  Oklahoma,  Report No. NCGWR 80-17, 1980.
Pye, pj
               p. 49.
 R. H. Harris, "Health Effects Associated with Organic Chemical
 Contaminants in Ground Water," presented at the AAAS Annual
 Meeting, Washington, D.C., January 1982.  Harris is with
 Clement Associates, Washington, D.C.

 David E. Burmaster, Contamination of Ground Water by Toxic
 Chemicals.  U.S. Council  on Environmental Quality, January 1981.

Pye, op. cit.. p. 49, after Burmaster, op. cit.

J.  Tevere MacFadyen, "Routine Shipments of Essential Goods
are Freighted with Special Risks," Smithsonian Magazine,
April  1984, pp.  44-53.

-------
103.    Ibid., p. 50.  See also Chemical  & Engineering  News,  November  24,
        1980; also based on discussions with  CHEMTREC operations  manager
        and staff.

104.    Chemical  & Engineering News.  March 24,  1980, p.  70

105.    Chemical  & Engineering News.  November 24,  1980,  p.  20.

106.    Ibid.  See also MacFadyen,  op. cit.,  p.  46.

107.    Ibid.

108.    MacFadyen, op.cit., p. 46.

109.    V.  T. Coates, T.  Fabian,  M. McDonald, Nineteenth  Century  Tech-
        nology, Twentieth Century Problems.   Prepared for EPA Office
        of  Special  Assessments and  Strategic  Studies, by  Dames &  Moore,
        Washington, D.C., May  1981.

        Michael H.  Brown, Laying  Waste.   Boston: Pantheon Books,  1981,
        p.  115.

        Coates, Fabian,  McDonald, op. cit.

        Compiled  from printouts established by Army Corps of  Engineers,
        during study cited in  Ref.  No. 109, ff.

       New  York Times.  "Dams Labeled  as Unsafe Remain Unrepaired  "
       November 15, 1981.

        Frederic  Golden, "Storm over  a  Deadly Downpour," Time,
        December 6, 1982, p. 84;  and  R.  Jeffrey Smith,  "Administration
        Views on  Acid Rain Assailed," Science 221, August 5,  1983,
        P.  38.

115.    J.  Donald Cook, E.P.A., "Facing  the Challenge of Acid Rain,"
        Chemical  & Engineering News,  April 2, 1984,  p.  36;  Cf Letter
        to  the Editor of New York Times  by Russell W. Peterson,  President
        of Audubon Society, March 13, 1984.

116.    Edward C. Krug and Charles  R. Frink,  "Acid Rain  on  Acid  Soil:
        A New Perspective," Science 221,  August  5, 1983,  p. 522.

117.    National  Research Council,  Committee  on  the Atmosphere and
        the Biosphere,  "Atmosphere-Biosphere  Interactions:  Towards
        a Better  Understanding of the Ecological Consequences of
        Fossil Fuel Combustion,"  Washington,  D.C.: National Academy
        Press, 1981.

118.    Fred Pearce, "The Menace  of Acid  Rain,"  New Scientist.
        August 12,  1982,  p. 419.
110.


111.

112.


113.


114.

-------
                                 -208-
119.    Pearce,  op.  cit.,  p.  423.

1200    Comptroller  General of  the  United States, General Accounting
        Office,  The  Debate Over Acid Precipitation,  Washington,  D,C.:
        GPO,  September 11, 1981, pp.'l,  11-13.

121.    Office of Technology  Assessment, The.Role of Genetic  Testing
        in the Prevention  of  Occupational Disease,   April 1983,
        Washington,  D.C.

-------
                                -209-
                              REFERENCES

                               Chapter 5
  1.   Science Council of Canada, Policies and Poisons: The
      Containment of Long-term Hazards to Human Health in the
      Environment and in the Workplace, Report No. 28, Ottawa,
      Ontario: Science Council of Canada: October 1977, p. 14.

 20   American Chemical  Society, Committee on Environmental  Improve-
      ment, Cleaning Our Environment:  A Chemical  Perspective, second
      edition, Washington,  D.C., American Chemical Society,  1978,
      p. 96.

 3.   National Research  Council, Strategies to Determine  Needs and
      Priorities for Toxicity Testing, Volume 1:  Design.  Washington,
      D.C., National Academy Press,  1981, pp.  18-19.

 4.   National Research  Council, Toxicity Te st inq: Strateg i e s to
      Determine Needs and Prion'ties,  Washington, D.C., National
      Academy Press, 1984,  p.3.

 5.   National Research  Council, Toxicity Testing: Strategies to
      Determine Needs and Priori ties,  Washington, D.C., National
      Academy Press, 1984,  pp.117-119.

 6.   Mark Nuttner,  OTS, personal  communication,  May  8, 19840

 7.   American Chemical  Society, Committee on Environmental  Improve-
      ment, Cleaning Our Environment:  A Chemical  Perspective, second
      edition, Washington,  D.C., American Chemical Society,  1978,
      Po 43.

 8.   L. A. Currie,  "The Analytical  Measurement Process:  Assumptions
      and Realistic  Measures of Uncertainty," presented at a sympo-
      sium on  Improving  the Analytical Chemistry/Regulatory  Inter-
      face, October  19-21,  1983, National  Bureau  of Standards,
      Gaithersburg,  Maryland, cited  below as NBS  10/82 symposium.,

 9.   Velmer A.  Fassel,  "Quantitative  Elemental Analyses  by  Plasma
      Emission Spectroscopy," Science  202, October 13, 1978,
      pp. 183-191.

10.   Gangadhar Choudhary,  ed«,  Chemical  Hazards  in the Workplace:
      Measurement and Control, American  Chemical  Society  Symposium
      Series 149, Washington, D.C.,  American Chemical  Society, 1981.

11.   Ibid.

-------
                                 -210-
12.   Etcyl H. Blair, "Analytical  Chemistry and the Regulatory
      Interface — the Industry View," presented at NBS 10/82
      symposium.

130   David B0 Maclean, "Role of AOAC in the Regulatory Process,"
      presented at NBS 10/82 symposium.

14.  Chemical  & Engineering News (C&EN), "Dioxin-Tainted Town;
     EPA will  Buy Homes,  May Raze  Site," February 28,  1983,  p.6.

15.  David B.  Maclean, op.  cit.

16.   Curt W.  Reimann, "The Concept of an Analytical  Chemical
      Measurement System,"  presented at NBS 10/82 symposium.

17.   American Chemical Society, Committee on Environmental
      Improvement, op. cit., p. 980

18.   Ibid.

19-   Chemi calweek, "Tighter Controls on Toxics Testing,"  August  14,
      1983, p. 35.

20.  Office of Technology Assessment, The Information  Content of
     Preinanufacture Notices, Washington, D.C.:  U.S.  GPO,
     April 1983, pp.  50-54.

21.   Ibid., p. 51.

22.   National Research Council, Toxicity Testing,  Strategies  to
      Determine Needs or  Priorities,  Washington,  D.C.:  GPO, 1984,
      pp.  8-10.
23.   James E. Gibson, personal communication, August 24,  1983.

24.   ChqiqicaJIweek.  "Faster, Cheaper Testing for Mutaqens,"
      February 23, 1983.

25.   Robert Simon, personal communication, September 20,  1983.

26.   Robert N. Hoover, "Identification and Quantification of Health
      Hazards in Populations:  The Epidemiologic Assessment of Risk,"
      presented at Scientists'  Forum on An Assessment of the  Scientific
      Knowledge Base Related to Victim Compensation, January 27-29,
      1982, National  Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., cited  below
      as NSF 1/82 Forum,  p. 26.

27.   H. Garrett DeYoung, "Biosensors:  The Mating of Biology and
      Electronics," High  Technology, November 1983, pp. 41-47.

28.   Robert N. Hoover, op. cit.

-------
                                -211-
29.   Michael  Brown,  Laying Waste:   The  Poisoning of America  by
      Toxic  Chemicals,  New York:   Pantheon  Books, 1980,  p.  327.

30.   U.S.  Department of Health,  Education,  and  Welfare,  Human
      Health and the  Environment—Some Research  Needs.   Report of
      the Second Task Force for Research Planning in Environmental
      Health Science, Washington,  D.C.:   U.S.  GPO,  1977,  pp.  278-284.

31.   Eliot Marshall, "Toxicology Labs  to Bar Financial  Conflicts,"
      Science 22, August 19,  1983, pp.  727-28; or Sharon Begley,
      "Scandal in the Testing Lab," Newsweek. May 30,  1983, p.  83.

32.   National Research Council,  Strategies to Determine Needs  and
      Priorities for  Toxicity Testing,  Volume 1: Design, Washington,
      D.C.,  National  Academy  Press, 1981, pp. 74, 100-101.

33.   Robert N.  Hoover, op. cit.,  pp.  3-4.

34.   Robert N.  Hoover, op. cit,.. pp.'T8.

35.   The following   outline of the applications and techniques
      of epidemiology is taken from Robert N. Hoover, op.cit., pp.  9-14.

36.   Robert N.  Hoover, op. cit.,  p. 23.

37.   Ibid.

38.   Larry D. Edmonds, Peter M.  Lyde, Levy M. James, J. William Flynt,
      J. David Erickson, and Godfrey P. Oakley, Jr., "Congenital  Mal-
      formations Surveillance: Two American Systems," International
      Journal of Epidemiology 10 (3): 247-252, 1981.

39.   Robert N.  Hoover, op. cit.
40.   Science "A New Kind of Epidemiology,"  May 4, 1984, p. 481.

41.   Gary Hertz, NBS Center for  Analytical Chemistry, personal  com-
      munication, October 12, 1983,,

42.   Jeremy Mai'n, "DOW vs.  the Dioxin Monster," Fortune, May 30,
      1983, p. 83.

43.   Environmental Protection Agency, "Report of the Toxics Inte-
      gration Project," September 1981,

44.   Gangadhar Choudhary, ed.,  op. cit.

45.   National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "New Satellite
      Technology Tested for Use as Toxic Waste Monitor," Release
      No. 82-38, October 13,  1982, for example, and Robert  L. Swann
       and Alan  Eschenroeder,  Eds,,  Fate  of Chemicals  in  the  Environ-
       ment. American Chemical Society Symposium Series  225,  Washington,
       D.C.: American Chemical Society,  1983.

-------
                                -212-
46.  For example, Gordon Graff, "Fiber Optics Analyze Chemical
     Processes," High Technology. February 1983, pp. 24-25.

47.   Office of Technology Assessment, Impacts of Applied Genetics.
      Washington, D.C.: U.S. GPO, April 1981, p. 125

48.   Virgil Freed, "Tracing the Movement of Pollutants through the
      Environment," presented at Scientists'  Forum on An Assessment of
      the Scientific Knowledge Base Related to Victim Compensation,
      January 27-29, 1982, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C,

49.   National Research Council, Strategies to Determine Needs and
      Priorities for Toxicity Testing. Volume 2: DevelopmentT
      Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1982, p. 27.

50.   Bertram W. Carnow and Shirley A. Conibear, "Clinical  Environ-
      mental and Occupational Medicine," presented at  Scientists'
      Forum on An Assessment of the Scientific Knowledge Base Related
      to Victim Compensation, January 27-29,  1982, National Science
      Foundation, Washington, D.C.

51.   Curt W. Reimann, op. cit.

52.   Peat, Marwick, Mitchell  & Company,  An Industry  Survey  of Chemical
      Company Activities To Reduce Unreasonable  Risk,"Washington, D.C.;
      Oiemical Manufacturers Association,  FebruaTyTl,  1983, p.22.
53.    Robert  H.  Ross and Paul Lu, Chemical Scoring System Develop-
       ment, work sponsored by the Assessment Division, Office of
       Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Draft, June 1981.

54.   National Research Council, Toxicity Testing: Strategies to
      Determine Needs and Priorities. Washington, D.C.: National
      Academy Press, 1984.

55.   For example,  Paul  Slovic,  Baruch Fischhoff, and Sarah
      Lichtenstein, "Rating  the  Risks,"  Environment 21(3), April
      1979, pp. 14-39.

56.   Robert H. Hoover,  op.  cit.,  p.  36.

57.   Zsolt Harsanyi and Richard Hutton,  Genetic Prophecy:   Beyond
      the.Double Helix,  New  York:   Rawson,  Wade  Publishers,  1981,
      p. 40.

58.   James E. Gorman, Hazards to  Your Health. New York Academy of
      Sciences, 1979,  p. 8.

59.   Richard  D. Lyons,  "Physical  and Mental  Disabilities  in
      Newborns Doubled  in 25  Years,"  New  York Times,  July  18,
      1983, p. A15.

-------
                               -213-
60.  Victor Cohn, "No Increase Seen in Rate of Birth Defects,"
     Washington Post, September 16, 1983,  p. A3.

61.  Bruce N. Ames, "Dietary Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens,"
     Science 221, September 23, 1983,  pp.  1256-1264; or National
     Research Council, Diet, Nutrition and Cancer,  Washington,
     D.C. : National Academy Press,  1982.
62.  National  Science Foundation,  Groundwater  Resources  and
     Contamination in the United States,  Papers  for  and  Summary
     of a Workshop, March 14-15, 1983,  PRA Report  83-12, Washington,
     D.C.:  National  Science Foundation,  August  1983.

63.  V.T. Coates, J.F. Coates,  and H.H. Hitchcock, Clues to  the
     Domestic  Environmental  Agenda for  the Next  Three  Decades,
     February  8, 1983, p. 23.

64.  For example, Nicholas J.  Grant,  "The New  Metallurgy of  Rapid
     Solidification," in The Decades  Ahead:  An  MIT  Perspective,
     Proceedings of a Symposium for Senior Executives, June  24-26,
     1980, Cambridge, Massachusetts:  MIT, 1980, pp. 379-92;  or
     Mary Helen Johnston, "Superalloys  Take  Flight," High Technology,
     July/August 1983, pp. 29-30.

65.  Carl Rain, "Surface Magic:  Making Metals Tougher," High
     Technology, March 1983, pp. 59-64; or Thomas  Moore, "New
     Victories in War on Corrosion,"  High Technology,  July/August
     1983, pp. 25-26.

66.  Chemical week, "Housing:  The  Rebuilding of  Chemicals'
     Bellwether Market," May 25, 1983,  pp. 42-46.

67.  Chemicalweek, "Rising Auto Sales Boost  the  Hopes  of Plastics
     Makers,"  September 21,  1983,  pp. 12-13.

68.  National  Science Foundation,  The Five-Year  Outlook:   Problems,
     Opportunities and Constraints  in Science and  Technology',
     Volume II, NSF 80-30, Washington, D.C.:  Government Printing
     Office, 198'0, pp. 177-79.   Also  Selwyn  Enzer, Plastics  --
     Competing Material  by 1985:  A Delphi  Forecasting Study,
     Menlo Park, California:  Institute for  the  Future,  1971.

69,  John Kerr, "British Bid to Catch Up  in  Ceramics," New Scientist,
     July 26,  1983, p. 269;  and H.  Kent Bowen, "Ceramics  in High
     Technology Systems:  Process  Innovations,"  in The Decades
     Ahead: An MIT Perspective, Proceedings of  a  Symposium  for
     Senior Executives,  June 24-26, 1980,  Cambridge, Massachusetts:
     MIT, 1980, pp. 367-78.

-------
                               -214-
70.  V.T. Coates,  et al.,  op.  cit.

71.  Ted Lynch,  Larry Davies,  and  Justine  Alchowiak,  Assessment  of
     Future Environmental  Trends and  Problems  of  Increased  Use,
     Recycling and Combustion  of Fiber-Reinforced,  Plastic  and
     Metal  Composite Materials, Project  Summary,  Washington,  D.C.:
     U.S. GPO, October 1982, p.2.

72.  V.T. Coates,  et al^,  op.  cit.

 73.   Chemicalweek,  "Electronic Chemicals:   Everyone  is  Scrambling
      for a Piece  of the Action," April  20,  1983, p.  32.

 74.   Chemicalweek,  "Magnetic  Storage Media:   A Materials Market
      in a  Ferment," February  9, 1983, p.  38.

 75.   National Science Board,  Science Indicators  1980, Washington,
      D.C.:  U.S.  GPO, 1981, p. 202.

76.  Time,  "Sounding the Tocsin for Toxins," July 25, 1983, p. 61.

77.  LaDou, Joseph,  "The Not-So-Clean Business of Making Chips,"
     Jj^chm}loj$_R_ey_i_e_w, May/June 1984, pp. 23-24.

78.  Nicholas Basta, "Zeolites: Old Minerals Get  a  New Look,"
     High Technology, July 1983, p. 59;  and  Chemical week,  "Early
     Health Warnings over  Exposure  to Zeolites,"  August  3,  1983.

79.  Paul Breeze,  "Molecular Path  to a New Electronics," New
     Scientist,  June 16, 1983, p.  782.

80.  Edward W. Lawless and Howard M. Gadberry, Forecasting  Emerging
     Environmental  Problems:   Development  of a Program Plan,  Final
     Report, MRI  Project No. 5-1710-L, Kansas  City, Missouri:
     Midwest Research Institute, May 15, 1978.

81.  V.T. Coates,  e_t aK_,  op.  cit.

82.  Paul  D. Maycock and Edward N. Stirewalt,  Photovoltaics:
     Sunlight to Energy in One Step, Andover,  Massachusetts:
     Brick  House Publishing, 1981.

83.  Paul  D. Maycock,  Katsunori Shimada, Edward N.  Stirewalt, and
     V.  Daniel Hunt, America Challenged:   Photovoltaics  in  Japan,
     Alexandria, Virginia:  Photovoltaic Energy Systems, Inc., 1982,

84.  V.T. Coates,  e_t aj^,  op.  cit.

85.  Science News, "Pesticides: The human  body burden,"
     September 24, 1983, p. 199.

-------
                               -215-
86. David Bull, A Growing Problem:  Pesticides and the Third World
    Poor. Oxford:  Oxfam, 1982.

87. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service,
    Inputs;  Outlook and Situation. IOS-1, June 1983, p. 9.

88. Among many examples, Alan R. Putnam, "Allelopathic Chemicals:
    Nature's Herbicides in Action," C&EN, April 4, 1983, pp. 34-39;
    New York Times, "Duped Pests Find Death in Mating,'  August 20,
    1982, p. A10; Washington Post. "Social  Insecticide," March 25,
    1983, p. A21.

89. Robert N. Hoover, op. ci't., p. 29.

90.  National Research Council, Strategies to Determine Needs and
     Priorities for Toxicity Testing, Volume 2:  Development,
     Washington, D.C.:  National Academy Press, 1982, pp. 134-36.

91.  National Research Council, Strategies to Determine Needs and
     Priorities for Toxicity Testing, Volume 1: Design, Washington,
     D.C.:  National Academy Press, 1981.

92.  Andrea B. Coolidge, Joseph F. Coates, Henry H. Hitchcock, and
     Teresa Gorman, Environmental Consequences of Telematics:
     Telecommunication, Computation, and Information Technologies —
     A  Mini-Assessment. April 1982, Washington, D.C. and Chemical-
     week. "Taking Toxics Testing out to the Toxics," May 30, 198~4,
     pp. 35-39.

93.  Andrea B. Coolidge, et al, op. cit.


94.  Joseph  F.  Coates,  Implications of Biotechnology  for  NBS,
     A  Seminar  Presentation.  Planning  Report 4,  National  Bureau
     of Standards,  Planning Office, November 16, 1981, Washington,  D.C,

95.  Office  of  Technology Assessment,  Impacts  of Applied  Genetics,
     Washington,  D.C.:   U.S.  GPO,  April  1981,  pp.  85-106.

96. See Steven 0.  Hochhauser, "Bringing Biotechnology to Market,"
    High Technology. February 1983, pp. 55-60; and Thomas C. O'Brien,
    NBS and  Industrial Biotechnology;  Technical  Developments and
    Future Measurement Needs. NBSIR 82-2549, NBS  Planning Report 12,
    Washington, D.C.:  National Bureau of Standards, July 1982.

97, Harold M. Schmeck, Jr., "Gene-Splicers Plan Release of Bacteria
    to  Aid Crops," New York Times, August 30, 1983, p. Cl.

98..Steven J. Hochhauser, "Bringing Biotechnology to Market,"
    High Technology, February 1983, pp.  55-60.

-------
                   APPENDIX   .
LIST OF WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVIEWEES

-------
3738 KANAWHA STREET. N.W.    WASHINGTON. 0 C. 70015
                                      TOXICS '95

                                   REVIEW WORKSHOP

                                  September 14, 1983
          8:30    Welcome, Coffee

          9:00    Introductions

                  About this Project:  Vary Coates,  Project Manager

                                      Ellen Selonick,  EPA Program Manager

          9:00    Plenary Round Robin:  Your most important overall comments
                                       on the discussion papers.

         10:15    Paper Review Sessions:  Working Groups

                              •  Comments, Criticisms,,  Suggestions

                              •  Questions for the  Participants

                              t  Nominal  Group Exercise:               v

                                 Trends and Factors—Priorities  for Analysis

         12:15    Lunch Break

          1:00 .   Working Group Reports and Further Discussion of Papers
                                                U
          2:00    The Future of Chemicals Production,  Use,  and Control:
                     The Implications  of  the Trends.

                              •  General  Discussion

                              •  Working  Groups:  Brainwriting Exercise

                              •  Report Back,  Further  Discussion,  and
                                 Summation

          4:00    Adjourn
         Project  Team:
              Vary  T.  Coates,  Ph.D.,  Project Manager
              Joseph  F.  Coates
              Lisa  Heinz
              Tracie  Monk
              Beverly Goldberg,  Workshop  Coordinator

-------
3i
J8 KANAWHA STREET. N.W.    WASHINGTON. D.C. 20015
                                             A-2
                                        Participants

                                         TOXICS '95
                                       Review Workshop
                                     September 14, 1983
             Jim Aidala
             Environmental Policy Division
             Congressional Research Service
             423 Madison Building
             Library of Congress
             Washington, D.C.  20540
               287-7254

             Scott Baker
             Senior Staff Officer
             Toxicology Programs
             Suite 651
             National Academy of Sciences
             2122 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
             Washington, D.C.  20037
               334-2536

             Ed Bergen
             OSHA
             Department of Labor
             200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
             Washington, D.C.  20210
               523-8021

             Paul Bickert
             Office of Toxic Substances
             EPA 207 East Tower
             401 M Street, S.W.
             Washington, D.C.  20460
               382-3683

             Dr. Shirley Briggs
             Director
             Rachel Carson Council
             8940 Jones Mill  Road
             Chevy Chase, Md.  20815
               652-1977

             Eloise Brooks, Director
             Division of Industrial  Operations
             Office of Industry Policy
             Department of Transportation
             400 Seventh Street, N.W.
             Washington, D.C.  20590
               426-4214
Dr. Ken Burgess
Dow Chemical Company
Midland, Mich.
   (517) 536-3177

Christopher Cathcart
Chemical Manufacturers Assoc.
2501 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20037
  887-1265

Dr. Charles Eby
Monsanto Corporation
1101 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20036
  452-8880

Fran Irwin
The Conservation Foundation
1717 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20036
  797-4300

David Kiefer
Managing Editor
Chemical & Engineering News
1155 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20036
  872-4489

Dr. Winston Nottingham
Room 340
National Science Foundation
1800 G Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20006
  357-7503

Dr. Jane Robens
Agricultural Research Service
Safety and Health Division
Beltsville, Md.  20705
  (301) 344-3381

-------
                                A-3
Kenneth Rosenbaum
Environmental Law Institute
Suite 600
1346 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20036
  452-9600

Ellen Selonick
Program Manager
Office of Toxic Substances
EPA 230 East Tower
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C.  20460
  382-3701

Dr. Robert Simon
Chemical Sciences and Technology
National Academy of Sciences
NAS 273
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20006
  334-2156

Joe Uehlein
Industrial Union Department
AFL-CIO
815 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20005
  842-7815

J.F. Coates, Inc.

Dr. Vary T. Coates, Project Manager
Joseph F.  Coates

Lisa Heinz

Trade Monk

Beverly Goldberg, Workshop Coordinator

-------
                                             A-4

3 KANAWHA STREET. N.W.    WASHINGTON. O.C. 2001S
                                        Participants
                                         TOXICS '95
                                       Review Workshop
                                      December 14, 1983
                                Jim Aidala
                                Environmental Policy Division
                                Congressional Research Service
                                423 Madison Building
                                Library of Congress
                                Washington, D.C.  20540
                                  287-7254

                                Ed Bergen
                                OSHA
                                Department of Labor
                                200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
                                Washington, D.C.  20210
                                  523-8021

                                Justin Powell
                                Office of Toxic Substances
                                EPA
                                401 M Street, S.W.
                                Washington, D.C.  20460
                                  382-3689

                                Dr. Stephen Quigley
                                4849 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
                                Washington, D.C.  20008
                                  695-5400

                                Kenneth Rosenbaum
                                Environmental Law Institute
                                Suite 600
                                1346 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
                                Washington, D.C.  20036
                                  452-9600

                                Ellen Selonick
                                Program Manager
                                Office of Toxic Substances
                                EPA 230 East Tower
                                401 M Street, S.W.
                                Washington, D.C.  20460
                                  382-3701

-------
                               A-5
     Some of the people who contributed substantially to this
report through discussion and interviews are listed below:
Gail Bingham, Associate, The Conservation Foundation
Dr. Charles Brown, Biometry Branch, National Cancer Institute
Leslie Cheek, Vice President, Federal Affairs, Crum & Forster
     Insurance Companies
Donald N. Collins, Vice President, Communications, The Fertilizer
     Institute
Ed Davidson, Director, Member Services, Chemical  Specialties
     Manufacturers Association
Chester Dickerson, Director of Agricultural  Affairs, Monsanto
     Corporation
Dr. Thomas Dietz, Graduate Projects in Science, Technology  and
     Public Policy, The George Washington University
Dr. James E. Gibson, Chemical Industry Institute  of Toxicology
Dr. Linda Greer, Staff Scientist, Toxic Chemicals Program,
     Environmental Defense Fund
Erik Jansson, Research Associate, Friends of the  Earth
Dr. Irene Ann Jillson, Policy Research, Inc.
George Kaiser, At-Sea Incineration
Dr. Ed Lawless, Midwest Research Institute
Dr. Ben Luberoff, Editor, Chemtech
Dr. Myron Numan, Environmental Studies Board, National Academy of
     Sciences
Dr. Edna Palson, Director, Toxicology Information Center, National
     Academy of Sciences
Sheldon W. Samuels, Director, Health and Safety,  Industrial  Union
     Department, AFL-CIO
Joe Techet, Corn Product Corporation
Vincent Tocci, Director, Public Relations, American Chemical
     Society
Gerard J. Waldron, Congressional Aide, Representative Ed Markey,
     7th District, Massachusetts
Michael Walsh, Institute for Water Resources, Army Corps of
     Engineers

-------
                               A-6
Liz Davenport, Environmental Action
Dr. Geraldine Cox,  Vice President, Technical  Director, Chemical
     Manufacturers Association
Dr. Gary Hertz, Acting Director, Center for Analytical  Chemistry,
     National Bureau of Standards
Dr. Sam Shapiro, Professor, Health Policy, Johns Hopkins University
Bob Reineke, Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
Dr. Clement Bezold, Institute for Alternative  Futures
Dr. Earl Pollack, Chief, Biometry Branch, National  Cancer Institute
Dr. Larry Edmonds, Birth Defects Branch, Centers for Disease Control
Lawrence Norton, Director, Operations, National  Agricultural
     Chemicals Association
Russ Bunker, Office of Safety, Federal Railroad  Administration
Godfrey P.  Oakley, Director, Birth Defects Branch,  Centers  for
     Disease Control
Dr. Robert Dickson, National Institute of Environmental  Health
     Sciences
Dr. Will Carpenter, Director, Environmental  Operations,  Monsanto
     Corporation
Dr. Ron Condray, Monsanto Corporation
Sam Gusman, Director, Toxics Research, Conservation Foundation

-------