560/6-78-006
  ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF
 POLYCHLORINATED  BIPHENYLS (PCBs)
NEAR NEW BEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS
         MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
               May 1978
      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
        OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

-------
                   DISCLAIMER

This report has been reviewed by the Office of
Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, and approved for publication.  Mention of
trade names or commercial products does not con-
stitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)

                    NEAR NEW BEDFORD, MA

                     MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
                     Final Task Report
                   Research Request No. 4
                  Contract No. 68-01-3248
                             by
  Charles L. Stratton, Karen L. Tuttle, and J. Mark Allan

        ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC.
            P. 0. Box 13454, University Station
                Gainesville, Florida  32604
                      Project Officer
                        Thomas Kopp
                 OFFICE OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES
              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                  Washington, D.C.  20460
                         May, 1978

-------
                                    CONTENTS
Figures
Tables
Acknowledgement

     1.  INTRODUCTION                                                      1

     2.  DESCRIPTION OF THE  SITE                                           3

     3.  FIELD SURVEY AND  SAMPLING                                         6

              Ground Waters                                                6
              Soils                                                       10
              Drinking Water                                              10
              Surface Water  and Sediments                                 10
              Vegetation                                                  14
              Aquatic Biota                                               14
              Terrestrial  Biota                                           14
              Air                                                         16

     4.  ANALYTICAL RESULTS  AND DISCUSSION                                17

              Ground Waters                                               17
              Soil Borings                                                18
              Stream Sediments                                            24
              Surface Water                                               24
              Biota                                                       24
              Ambient Air                                                 27

     5.  CONCLUSIONS                                                      36,

-------
                               LIST  OF  FIGURES

                                                                         Page

Figure 1     New Bedford Municipal Landfill  and  Surroundings               4

Figure 2     Possible Avenues  for PCS to  Re-enter  the  Environment
             from Landfill Disposal  Site                                    7

Figure 3     Groundwater Sampling Points                                    8

Figure 4     Stream  Sampling Stations                                      11

Figure 5     Marsh Sampling Stations                                       12

Figure 6     Terrestrial Trap  Locations                                    15

Figure 7     Chromatogram of Shallow Groundwater Sample  from
             Test Well No. 9                                               19

Figure 8     Chromatogram of (a) Aroclor  1016 Standard and
             (b) Aroclor 1242  Standard                                     20

Figure 9     Chromatogram of Aroclor 1254 Standard                         21

Figure 10    Chromatogram of Soil Core  (0-15 cm) Taken at Test
             Well No. 9                                                    22

Figure 11    Chromatogram of Extract From Sediment  Sample Taken
             From Behind Lums                                              25

Figure 12    Chromatogram of Fish Sample  Extract from  Sample
             Station No. 8                                                 28

Figure 13    Chromatogram of Extract from Herring Gull Eggs                29

Figure 14    Chromatogram of One-Hour Ambient Air  Sample Taken
             at the  Landfill Site                                          30

Figure 15    Chromatogram of an Aroclor 1242 Standard                      31

Figure 16    Chromatogram of Air Sample Taken Upwind of  Aerovox
             Corporation                                                   34

Figure 17    Chromatogram of Air Sample Taken Downwind of Aerovox
             Corporation                                                   35
                                    ii

-------
                                 LIST  OF  TABLES









Table 1     Well Test Data




Table 2     Stream  Sampling  Stations




Table 3     Marsh Sampling Stations




Table 4     Air Samples  Taken  June 28 through 30,  1977*




Table 5     Ground  Water




Table 6     Soil Sample  Analytical Results




Table 7     Bottom  Sediment  Analytical Results




Table 8     Analytical Results for Biota




Table 9     Analytical Results for Ambient  Air
Page




   9




  13




  13




  16




  17




  23




  23




  26




  32
                                     ill

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
     This environmental  assessment was  conducted  in cooperation with personnel
of the Environmental Protection Agency,  Region  I,  in particular, Mr. David K.
Moon, Dr. Thomas  Spiller,  Dr.  Edward L.  Taylor,  and Mr.  Allan Oi.  The sam-
pling program was planned  with the assistance of  Dr. Ian C.T. Nisbet of
Clement Associates.  Dr. Olin  C.  Braids  of  Geraghty & Miller, Inc., assisted
with the groundwater sampling.
                                    iv

-------
                                   SECTION  1
                                 INTRODUCTION
     Environmental  Science and Engineering,  Inc. (ESE) was requested to
conduct an evaluation of the  transport of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCS) from
a municipal  landfill located  in New Bedford, Massachusetts.  This task was
performed under  Contract 68-01-3248 with the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Office of Toxic  Substances.

     The objectives of  this task were to:

     1.  Establish  if there is migration of  PCB from the landfill, and if
         migration  exists;

     2.  Determine  the  extent and degree of  environmental contamination with
         PCB originating at the landfill;

     3.  Determine  the  mode, rate, and direction of PCB migration from the
         landfill; and

     4.  Establish a long-term groundwater monitoring program for PCB.

     It was decided to  approach this task in two phases.  The objective of the
first phase was  to establish if there is migration of PCB from the landfill.
This involved a  one-time field survey wherein samples were collected from all
media in the vicinity of the landfill that may serve as PCB transport media.
An excess number  of samples were taken.  PCB analysis was conducted on
selected samples  suspected to be the most likely to be contaminated by PCB

-------
originating at the landfill.  The results of this survey are described in this
report.  A second phase field survey was confined to the assessment of
airborne PCB levels in the vicinity of the landfill and near three other
potential sources of PCB in the area.  The results of the second survey are
also described.

-------
                                  SECTION  2
                           DESCRIPTION OF THE  SITE
     The New Bedford municipal  landfill has been  the  site  for  the  disposal  of
reject capacitors and other wastes  from two nearby  capacitor manufacturing
plants, Aerovox Industries, Inc., and Cornell-Dubilier Electronic  Corporation.
Over one-half million pounds of PCS have been disposed in  this  landfill  over
the years.  PCS wastes have not been disposed of  for  the past  two  years.  In
the past, Aroclorฎ 1242 was reported to be the  predominant PCB material  used
at these facilities.  Since 1970, Aroclor 1016  has  been used.

     The landfill is located one-half mile from the Paskamanset River near  the
southern end of a large glacial lake deposit that extends  from  the Apponagan-
sett Swamp to the northern limit of the Acushnet  Cedar Swamp.   Figure 1  shows
the location of the landfill near the New Bedford Airport  and  Interstate  195.

     This landfill has been in  use  for 56 years.  It  covers  an  area  of
40 acres, 24 of which are filled with refuse covered  with  fill  material.  The
geology of the area consists of a layer of freshwater peat varying from  7 to
10 feet thick, underlain by a thin  layer of silty fine sand, and then layers
of stratified silts and clayey  silts with thin  layers of silty  clay.  The sand
and silt layers vary from 8 to  36 feet deep.

     Groundwater, leachate, and soil samples were taken adjacent to  the  New
Bedford municipal landfill as part  of a regional  PCB  waste survey  conducted by
EPA Region I ("New England PCB  Waste Management Study," EPA  Region I,
November, 1976).  The results of the sampling effort  indicated  a trace
(1 ug/1) of PCB in one of four  shallow groundwater  samples taken at  the  edge

-------
                              NEW BEDFORD MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
                                      AND SURROUNDINGS
                                                                                 ^>  :*
                          • A+ 1^3 k ne (  Ceaac S u*a m p
'     V- \ i   -
;   ...J -\- I,  " '•
  ;•"  W \ '•"•I" V"ซ.
 • ,'-• V "   *•'  ,  />Ti - >'•'••••• -'    r  ^V' 7H,ซft.Srtt  • >.-
 - >-^-   ,?     .%   •••      $...  ^-*".:-
                     -
              LANDFILL
                                  Mil*
                                                                                        FIGURE 1

-------
of the landfill.  A sample of surface leachate contained 10 ug/1 of Aroclor
1016, and a surface soil sample contained 5.8 ppm Aroclor 1016 and 1.7 ppm
Aroclor 1254.  Other soil samples did not contain detectable levels of PCB.
These results indicated that transport of PCB from the landfill may be
occurring.

-------
                                   SECTION  3
                          FIELD  SURVEY AND  SAMPLING
     The first field survey was conducted on June  28  through  30,  1977-   The
objective of this  field survey was  to  collect  samples  representative  of  all
possible modes of  PCB transport from the landfill,  as  illustrated in
Figure 2.  Principal emphasis was placed on the  potential  for contamination
of groundwater and drinking water supplies.

     Samples were  taken of ground water, landfill  leachate, surface water,
sediments, soil, air, vegetation, and  aquatic  and  terrestrial biota in the
vicinity of the landfill, Apponagansett Swamp,  and  the Paskamanset River.
Samples taken and  locations are described below.

Ground Waters

     Fourteen well points were hand-driven to  various  depths  around the  edge
of the landfill at the locations shown in Figure 3, which  is  an  aerial
photograph of the  landfill.  Conductivity readings  were  taken at  each of these
sites.  Well depth and conductivity are listed in  Table  1.  The  conductivity
studies show that  at locations where two or more points  were  driven to
different depths,  the wells with the shallowest  depth  have  the highest
conductivities.  This indicates that the leachate  plume  is  shallow.   Wells 3,
4, and 5 were grouped together and  show this trend.   Wells  7, 8,  and  9 also
show this same trend.

-------
             POSSIBLE AVENUES FOR PCB TO RE-ENTER THE
             ENVIRONMENT FROM LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
           ATMOSPHERE   REMOVAL BY BIRDS
LEACHATE
 EROSION
                     LANDFILL
REMOVAL BY VEGETATION
REMOVAL BY TERRESTRIAL
AND AQUATIC ORGANISMS
                   GROUNDWATER
                    RECHARGE
                                                            FIGURE 2

-------
GROUNDWATER  SAMPLING  POINTS
                             mfs.
                             ^
                              >"'$&
                   ?  SURFACE WATER SAMPLING POINTS

                      GROUNDWATER SAMPLING JOINTS
                                                       FIGURES

-------
                                                TABLE 1.   WELL TEST DATA
vo
Well No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Conductivity
( umho s/ cm)
517
221
159
258
498
234
246
923
1,058
394
357
1,525
301
923
Depth
(m)
3.7
3.0
4.7
3.4
2.1
1.8
6.4
3.5
2.1
3.4
3.2
1.8
1.8
4.9
Depth
(ft)
12.0
10.0
15.5
11.0
6.5
6.0
21.0
11.5
6.5
11.0
10.5
6.0
6.0
16.0
Total Organic
Sulfate Chloride Iron Carbon
(rog/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1)
31 84 3.56 1.0

<5 13 5.26 14

3.37

<5 24 3.14 16

9.2 149 7.80 48


35 296 4.88 2.7



-------
Soils
     Difficulty was encountered in taking the soil core samples, since the
terrain around the well points was too wet to sample deeper than 18 inches.
Two core fractions were taken in the vicinity of Wells 7 and 9.  Surface soil
samples were taken at Wells  1, 3, 4, and 12.

Drinking Water

     Eighteen liters of water were collected at both Well A and Well B
of the Dartmouth Municipal Water Works.  In addition, a sample was taken from
a private drinking water supply in the vicinity of Station 8 (see Figure 4).
This residence (23 Tolland Path) has a deep artesian well (approximately
200 feet deep), and water was taken from an outside spigot for subsequent PCS
analysis.  These large volumes of water permitted PCB detection in the ppt
(parts per trillion or nanograms per liter) level.

Surface Water and Sediments

     The Paskamanset River was sampled at ten different locations (see
Figure 4).  Conductivity and pH were determined in situ, and the samples
listed in Table 2 were collected.

     Two additional bottom sediment samples were taken from the stream, one
approximately 4 miles downstream from the landfill in the vicinity of the
Dartmouth Municipal Water Supply (not shown on map) and one near 1-195 next to
the Holiday Inn (see Figure 4)-

     The Apponagansett Swamp was sampled at seven different locations, as
illustrated in Figure 5.  Conductivity and pH were determined in situ, and
samples were taken of water, emergent vegetation, and benthic organisms as
described in Table 3.  It appears from the conductivity data that if landfill
leachate is entering the marsh, it is entering from the north and west
sections of the landfill.
                                     10

-------
               STREAM  SAMPLING STATIONS
 ''r-
                                                    v  ~~-~j  :'•''. J:'---i

   -r La*  •  J   \
   5WtI Hip I  -^    \
D A R Ti  "o\U, T
                                                    NEW  BEDFOR'D

                                                            -i ..-••-  •
                                            ^N--" -' "Y- '  *'\^

                                           .            ^



          \™jffi$&i$ ,   ^^^'-'^ii^^'^^
          * *-}i  ,\v  . - -    ^ .. •  -^5--V.'5.'--v -  \  •  '•* ';  V..,,.,.". /--"-;i
                                               -

'36        57'3C" '37




 • STREAM SAMPLING STATIONS





 ^C FISH SAMPLING  POINTS




 + BOTTOM SEDIMENT
                                                                      FIGURE4
                               11

-------
MARSH  SAMPLING STATIONS
          MARSH SAMPLING STATIONS
          AIR SAMPLING LOCATION
               12

-------
                     TABLE 2.  STREAM SAMPLING STATIONS
Station              Conductivity                 Bottom
  No.         pH      (umhos/cm)      Benthos    Sediment    Water    Fish
   1          7.4        170             XXX*
   2          5.9         72             XXX
   3          6.9        104             XXX
              5.5         68             X
              5.9         80                        X
X
              5.3         38                        XX
              6.1         90                        XX
   8          6.3         89
X*
                                         X
  10
*18-liter sample collected.
                      TABLE 3.  MARSH SAMPLING STATIONS
Station                Conductivity
  No.          pH       (umhos/cm)       Benthos     Vegetation     Water
  11           7.2          524             XXX
  12           7.1          552             XXX
  13           6.9        2,852             XXX
  14           7.2        1,748             XXX
  15           7.1        2,070                          X            X
  16           6.6        2,208                          X            X
  17           7.1        1,380
                                      13
       X

-------
Vegetation

     Vegetation was collected  at  each  of  the  seven  marsh  stations  as  indicated
in Table 3.  The dominant  type of vegetation  was  collected  at  each location.

Aquatic Biota

     Benthic organism  samples  were  collected  at  the stream  and marsh  stations
where noted in Tables  2  and  3. Approximately 15  fish were  collected  at  Sta-
tion 8 (Figure 4), most  of which  were  4  inches or less in length and  of  mixed
varieties.  Pumpkinseed  (Lepomis  gibbosus)  was the  predominant variety.   Only
one fish was collected at  Station 1.

Terrestrial Biota

     A total of 150 snap traps was  set along  5 transect lines, as  shown  in
Figure 6.  Ten trap stations 10 meters apart  were situated  along each transect
with 3 snap traps  at each  station.  A  total of 29 organisms consisting of
2 different species of mice  were  collected.  Six were collected from  the
transects  along the pipeline,  and the  remaining  23  were collected  from the
transects  along the golf course road.   The  field mice captured were of the
Peromyscus sp.  This species is omnivorous, eating  grains,  fruits, insects,
and other  small organisms.  Life  expectancy is less than  one year.

     Twenty eggs of the  herring gull  (Larus argentatus) were collected at Ram
Island, Mattapoisett,  Massachusetts, on  June  20,  1977, by Dr.  I.C.T.  Nisbet.
One egg was collected  from each of  20  nests.   Because of  the late  date of col-
lection, most of the eggs  had  been  incubated  2 to 3 weeks.   Ram Island is the
nearest gull colony to the New Bedford landfill  (about 7  kilometers), and
most, although probably  not  all,  herring gulls from this  colony feed  at  the
landfill.  They also feed  on fish wastes from the port and  on natural foods
along the  shore.
                                   14

-------
                   TERRESTRIAL TRAP LOCATIONS
                                                              *%&
TERRESTRIAL TRAP LINES
                                                               FIGURES
                                 15

-------
Air
     All air samples were  taken  by the  method of high-volume sampling at the
landfill site during the period  June  28 through 30,  1977.   Duplicate 30-,  60-,
180-, and 360-minute samples  were  taken.   One 15-minute sample was taken.   The
location of the  air sampler  is shown  in Figure 5.   Wind velocity during sam-
pling is reported  in Table 4.
            TABLE 4.  AIR SAMPLES  TAKEN JUNE 28 THROUGH 30,  1977*

15-minute
30-minute
60-minute
180-minute
360-minute

sample
sample
sample
sample
sample
Wind
Direction
WSW
WSW
WSW
WSW
NW
Velocity
10 to 15 mph
10 mph
10 mph
10 to 15 mph
12 to 15 mph
*Ambient  temperature  26ฐC.
     Additional  air  samples  were taken in conjunction with EPA Region I
personnel  during January,  1978.   Samples were taken upwind, on site,  and
downwind of  the  landfill  and upwind and downwind of three other potential
sources of airborne  PCB in the area,  including the municipal sewage sludge
incinerator;  Aerovox Corporation, and Cornel1-Dubilier Electronics Corporation
facilities.   All of  these  samples were of 3 hours duration, comprising
approximately 175 cubic meters of air.  During this sampling period,  the
ground was frozen and a light snow cover was present.  Ambient temperature was
0ฐC.
                                  16

-------
                                   SECTION 4
                      ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Ground Waters

     All shallow  groundwater  samples  taken along the periphery of the landfill
were analyzed  for PCB.   In  addition,  samples  collected from Well A and Well B
of the Dartmouth  Municipal  Water  Works  and the sample taken from a private
artesian well  (23 Tolland Path) were  analyzed for PCB.  These analytical
results are reported  in  Table 5.   Figure  3 shows the location of the shallow
groundwater samples.

                            TABLE 5.  GROUND  WATER
Test Well No.
1
3
5
7
9
12
Dartmouth Well A
Dartmouth Well B
Private Artesian Well
Well Depth
(m)
3.7
4.7
2.1
6.4
2.1
1.8

	
61
Aroclor 1016/1242
(ng/D*
<85
<85
<85
90
230
<85
<3
<3
<3
Aroclor 1254
(ng/D*
<110
<110
<110
150
530
<110
<1
<1
<1
*Parts per trillion  (ppt).
                                       17

-------
     Aroclor 1016/1242 and Aroclor  1254 were detected  in  the  two  shallow
groundwater samples taken on  the north edge of  the  landfill between  the land-
fill and the Paskamanset River.  All other results,  including those  for the
artesian aquifer (drinking water),  were below the respective  analytical
detection limits.

     Figure 7 is a chromatogram of  the water sample  taken from Test  Well 9.
Figure 8 shows chromatograms  of Aroclor 1016/1242,  and Figure 9 a chromatogram
of Aroclor 1254.  It can be seen that the well  water sample (Figure  7) con-
tains all the major peaks of  Aroclor 1254, except the  two latest  elating, and
many earlier peaks matching Aroclors 1016 and 1242.  It is not possible when
Aroclor 1254 is present to definitively identify the earlier  pattern as either
Aroclor 1016 or 1242, since the elution patterns for these two Aroclors differ
only with respect to the last few eluting peaks which  coincide with
Aroclor 1254 peaks.

     The groundwater analytical results indicate no  artesian  aquifer (drinking
water) contamination with PCB.  There is PCB contamination of the shallow
ground water to the immediate north of the landfill.  This contamination con-
sists of Aroclor 1016/1242 and Aroclor 1254, and seems to be  highest toward
the surface with decreasing concentrations with depth.  The maximum  PCB con-
centration measured was 0.76  ug/1.  There is no apparent  correlation of PCB
concentration to conductivity or any of the other parameters  (Fe, TOC, 804,
Cl~) measured in the shallow  ground waters.  PCB does  not appear  in  shallow
ground waters to the west, northwest, and east  of the  landfill.

Soil Borings

     Soil core samples taken  at Test Well 9 were analyzed in  two  sections.
The results are shown in Table 6 along with a surface  soil sample taken near
Test Well 3.  Figure 10 is the chromatogram of  the  0-  to  15-cm core  at Test
Well 9 showing that both Aroclor 1016/1242 and  Aroclor 1254 are present.

     The decreasing PCB concentration with core depth  agrees  with the  same
observation for the water taken from Test Wells 7 and  9.   In  these soil
                                     18

-------
i-
                                  'M
                                                                             •^•Peaks matching Aroclor 1016/1242



                                                                             A Peaks matching Aroclor 1254
                                     •X-     'Vl  *
                                    jjfZ'     '-''I  '.ฃi



                                   ฃ*$#  '"
                                    , f-j T-ro
                                    • '   I'vll'
                                    irCJ   ' "
                                                                                                               I-U

                                                                                                               o
c
30
m
                CHROMATOGRAM OF SHALLOW GROUNDWATER

                        SAMPLE FROM TEST WELL NO. 9

-------
Ni
O
                                         IX
                                         O
                                         f-
                                         I.M
                    I.
                                                           b)
      T]
      o
      c
      3)
      m
      oo
CHROMATOGRAM OF a) AROCLOR 1016 STANDARD
      AND b) AROCLOR 1242 STANDARD

-------
K)
     2;
     o
     c
     30
     rn
     to
CHROMATOGRAM OF AROCLOR 1254 STANDARD

-------
                                                                          •J^Peaks matching Aroclor 1016/1242



                                                                          ^fc Peaks matching Aroclor 1254
ro
r-o
T]


c

m

o
                                                                                                             u.

                                                                                                             I "j



                                                                                                             IM
                                              CHROMATOGRAM OF SOIL CORE (0-15 cm)

                                                    TAKEN AT TEST WELL NO. 9

-------
                  TABLE 6.  SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                   Aroclor 1016/1242         Aroclor 1254
                                         (ppb)                   (ppb)
Core at Test Well 9 (0 to 15 cm)           32                     183

Core at Test Well 9 (15 to 30 cm)          <7                      27

Surface Sample near Test Well 3            97                     343
                TABLE 7.  BOTTOM SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Station 1
Station 3
Station 5
Station 8
Behind Lums
Aroclor 1016/1242
(ppb)
30
<5
<5
<5
8
Aroclor 1254
(ppb)
230
34
170
<10
280
                                     23

-------
samples, Aroclor 1254 comprises approximately 82 percent  of  the  total  PCS
present, while for the shallow ground water  it  comprised  approximately
66 percent of the total PCB.

Stream Sediments

     Bottom sediment samples were taken  along the Paskamanset River  at the
locations shown in Figure 4.  A sample of  sediment was  also  taken  from the
stream passing through the property  in the vicinity  of  Interstate  195  and the
Holiday Inn (behind Lums), which is  reported (Mr. Daniel  K.  Moon,  personal
communication, EPA Region I) to have been  a  previous PCB  disposal  site.  The
sediment samples listed in Table 7 were  selected for analysis.

     Figure 11 is the chromatogram of the  extract from  the bottom  sediment
sample taken from the stream behind  Lums.  This chromatogram shows a total of
288 ppb PCB, 98 percent of which is  Aroclor  1254.

     PCB, consisting of predominately Aroclor 1254 with lesser amounts of
Aroclor 1016/1242, is present in stream  sediments along the  Paskamanset River
north of Interstate 195.  South of Interstate 195, PCB was not detected in
bottom sediments.

Surface Water

     The surface water sample from Sample  Station 8  (Figure  4) was analyzed
for PCB.  The remaining surface water samples are being held pending a
decision on further analyses.  The surface water at  Sample Station 8 did not
contain detectable levels of PCB.  Aroclor 1016/1242 was  less than 0.08 ug/1
(ppb), and Aroclor 1254 was less than 0.10 ug/1.
Biota
     Analysis was  conducted  of  a  composite  sample  of  benthic  organisms  taken
from Apponagansett  Swamp  (Figure  5)  along  the  periphery  of  the  landfill and a
second composite sample of benthic  organisms  taken from  the Paskamanset River
                                   24

-------
                                                                                 Peaks matching Aroclor 1016/1242


                                                                                 Peaks matching Aroclor 1254
C
3)
CHROMATOGRAM OF EXTRACT FROM SEDIMENT SAMPLE
             TAKEN FROM BEHIND LUMS

-------
north of Interstate 195 (Figure 4) at a distance of 1.6 to 2.0 km from the
landfill.  Fish samples taken at Sample Stations 1 and 8 (Figure 4) were also
analyzed.  The fish sample at Station 1 represents a single fish captured at
that location, while the sample at Station 8 is a composite of 15 fish of.
mixed variety, principally Pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus), all approximately
10 cm in length.

     Twenty eggs of the herring gull (Larus argentatus) were collected at Ram
Island, Mattapoisett, Massachusetts, on June 20, 1977, by Dr. I.C.T. Nisbet.
Ten of those eggs were composited for analysis of PCB.  Field mice (Peromyscus
sp.) were analyzed on a whole-body basis after removal of fur and skin.

     The analytical results for all the biota are summarized in Table 8.
Benthic organisms in the marsh adjacent to the landfill contained a total PCB
concentration of 2.53 ppm, of which 82 percent is Aroclor 1254.  In the stream
passing through the marsh at a distance of approximately 1.6 km from the
landfill, benthic organisms had a total PCB concentration of 1.35 ppm, of
which 84 percent is Aroclor 1254.

	TABLE 8.  ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR BIOTA	
                                        Aroclor 1016/1242     Aroclor 1254
                                             (ppb)*              (ppb)*

Benthos
     Marsh Sample Composite                   460                 2,070
     Stream Sample Composite                  220                 1,130
Fish
     Sample Station 1                         <10                   360
     Sample Station 8                         <10                   330
Herring Gull Eggs
     Ram Island Colony                         76                 4,600
Terrestrial Organisms
     Field Mice (Peromyscus sp.)
          Trap Line #1<10                    11
          Trap Line #2                        <10                    18

*Wet weight basis.

                                     26

-------
     The fish samples contained only traces of Aroclor  1016/1242, but larger
quantities of Aroclor 1254 (average 345 ppb).  Figure- 12 shows  the chroma-
togram of the fish sample taken at Sample Station 8.   It should be recalled
that PCS was not detected in either the water or bottom sediment at  this
location.

     The herring gull eggs contained substantial quantities (4.6 ppm) of Aro-
clor 1254, and lesser quantities (0.076 ppm) of Aroclor 1016/1242.   Figure 13
is a chromatogram of the egg extract.  The field mice  contained an average of
16 ppb of Aroclor 1254, while Aroclor 1016/1242 was not detected in  these
organisms.

Ambient Air

     Ambient air samples taken June 28 and June 30, 1977, over  the landfill
were analyzed for PCB.  These samples were located on  the landfill,  as illus-
trated in Figure 5.  The samplers were located about 2  meters above  ground
level.  Additional air samples were taken in the area  in January, 1978.  All
air analyses are reported in Table 9.

     On June 28, 1977, airborne PCB concentration over  the landfill  averaged
1.19 ug/nP.  These samples were taken from 11:00 a.m.  to noon while  wind
velocity was west-southwest at approximately 10 mph.  A sample  taken on
June 30, 1977, yielded a concentration of 0.41 ug/nP when winds were from
the northwest at 12 to 15 mph.  As may be seen by comparison of the  chromato-
gram of one of these air sample extracts (Figure 14) with the chromatogram of
Aroclor 1242 standard (Figure 15), the pattern match is very good.   Aroclor
1242 is clearly present in these air samples.  The presence of PCB in these
samples was confirmed by perchlorination.  Further analysis indicated that the
non-chlorinated species, biphenyl, was not present.

     Ambient air samples were taken in January, 1978, upwind, on site, and
downwind of the landfill, and upwind and downwind of three other possible
sources in the area.  The analytical results for these  samples  are also shown
in Table 9.  At the time of sampling, the ground was frozen and a light snow
                                      27

-------
NJ
oo
                                                                                      Peaks matching Aroclor 1016/1242



                                                                                      Peaks matching Aroclor 1254
    O
    c
    33
    m
    _*
    ro
CHROMATOGRAM OF FISH SAMPLE EXTRACT

       FROM SAMPLE STATION NO. 8

-------
ho
        f
      3)
      m
                                           - *ซi

                                           il •


                                           'L*
* i
                                                                                           Peaks matching Aroclor 1016/1242
                                                                                           Peaks matching Aroclor 1254
   CHROMATOGRAM OF EXTRACT

    FROM HERRING GULL EGGS


-------
                                           _ I	I	,	I—>
                                           "I   I    I   •
CHROMATOGRAM OF ONE-HOUR AMBIENT AIR SAMPLE
         TAKEN AT THE LANDFILL SITE
                                                    FIGURE 14
                  30

-------
                                  J_~	[	I	I	~
                                   ___ i    1   ;
CHROMATOGRAM OF AN AROCLOR 1242 STANDARD
                                                  FIGURE 15
                  31

-------
                TABLE 9.  ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR AMBIENT AIR
Sample
 Date
  Site
Location
     PCB
Concentration
   (ug/m^)
 Aroclor
6/28/77


6/30/77

1/17/78



1/24/78


1/27/78


1/19/78
landfill
landfill

landfill

landfill
sludge
 incinerator

Aerovox Corp.
Cornel1-
 Dubilier
on site
on site

on site

upwind
on site
downwind

upwind
downwind

upwind
downwind

upwind
downwind
     0.89
     1.5

     0.41

     0.0085
     0.021
     0.013

     0.0043
     0.013

     0.0056
     0.49

     0.019
     0.0051
1242/1016
1242/1016

1242/1016

1242/1016
1242/1016
1242/1016

1242/1016
1242/1016

1242/1016
1016 only

1242/1016
1242/1016
                                   32

-------
cover was present.  A light  snowfall  was  also occurring.   The data show an
increased airborne PCS concentration  downwind of the New Bedford municipal
sewage sludge  incinerator,  the  landfill,  and Aerovox Corporation facilities.
Ambient  levels  over the landfill  were substantially lower than during the sum-
mertime  sampling.  All samples  but  one indicated the presence of Aroclor 1016
and traces of Aroclor 1242.   Downwind of  the Aerovox Corporation, only Aroclor
1016 was detected.  Figures  16  and  17 show the chromatograms of the upwind and
downwind sample extracts,  respectively,  taken in the vicinity of the Aerovox
Corporation.  Note in these  figures that  the downwind sample is shown at a
recorder attenuation  twenty  times greater than the upwind sample.
                                       33

-------
                               1 ul Injection

                               Attenuation 64 x 10~10
     CHROMATOGRAM OF AIR SAMPLE
TAKEN UPWIND OF AEROVOX CORPORATION
FIGURE 16
                 34

-------
                                  0.2 ul Injection
                                  Attenuation 256 x 10
                                                   -10
       CHROMATOGRAM OF AIR SAMPLE
TAKEN DOWNWIND OF AEROVOX CORPORATION
FIGURE 17
                     35

-------
                                   SECTION  5
                                  CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions may be drawn  from the  analyses  conducted:

     1.  There is some movement of PCB  from the  landfill  into  the  water  table
         aquifer to the immediate north  of  the  landfill within Apponagansett
         Swamp.  PCB contamination appears  to decrease with  depth  in  the  water
         table aquifer from 0.76 ug/1 at a  depth of  2.1 meters to  0.24 ug/1  at
         6.4 meters.  Both Aroclor 1254  and Aroclor  1016/1242  are  present in
         contaminated waters, with Aroclor  1254  predominant.   The  areal  extent
         of the contamination of the shallow aquifer is probably very limited,
         since PCB contamination was not detected in other directions from the
         landfill.

     2.  The drinking water supply of Dartmouth, Massachusetts,  and of  a
         private artesian well south-southwest  of the landfill contained  no
         detectable traces of PCB at the few part per trillion level. Hence,
         PCB in the landfill does not seem  to be contaminating the deeper
         aquifers from which drinking waters are withdrawn.

     3.  Soils within Apponagansett Swamp to the immediate north  and  northwest
         of the landfill are contaminated with  PCB.   The  level of  contamina-
         tion seems to decrease rapidly  with depth.   The  predominant  material
         present appears to be Aroclor  1254, although Aroclor  1016/1242  is
         also present.  A total of 0.44  ppm PCB  at the soil  surface was  the
         maximum level measured.  The source of  this contamination is probably
         either erosion or leachate from the landfill.
                                   36

-------
4.  Benthic organisms in Apponagansett  Swamp  along  the  periphery  of  the
    landfill and within the Paskamanset River  are contaminated  with  PCS.
    The level of contamination  is higher in the  benthic organisms  taken
    near the landfill (2.5 ppm) than  those taken from the  stream
    (1.4 ppm).  These organisms probably accumulate  the PCB by  ingestion
    of contaminated soils and detrital  particles.

5.  Field mice captured in the  swamp  contain residual PCB  levels  of
    0.016 ppm.  This has probably accumulated  as a  result  of  the  consump-
    tion of contaminated animal and vegetable  matter.   Levels are  not
    high enough to indicate extensive bioaccumulation in these  short-
    lived animals.

6.  Bottom sediments along the  Paskamanset River exhibit some PCB  con-
    tamination, but only to the north of Interstate  195.  The transport
    of PCB downstream is limited in distance to  a reach of approximately
    2.5 km.

7.  Fish captured in the stream contained an average of 0.34 ppm  PCB.
    Fish probably accumulate PCB by eating contaminated organisms.   The
    fish captured were not of edible  size; however;  levels of contamina-
    tion were considerably below the  Food and  Drug Administration  action
    limit of 5 ppm for edible fish.

8.  Herring gull eggs taken from the  Ram Island  colony  contained  sub-
    stantial quantities of PCB  (4.6 ppm), predominantly in the  form  of
    Aroclor 1254.  Many of these gulls  feed at the  landfill; however,
    they also feed on fish and  other  organisms in the area which  may
    contain PCB.  Previous analysis of  fish taken from  New Bedford Harbor
    indicated substantial levels of PCB contamination (up  to  290  ppm in
    an American eel).  Hence, it is not possible to  unequivocally iden-
    tify the herring gull as  a  major  mode of PCB transport from the
    landfill.
                              37

-------
     9.  During  the  summer,  airborne  PCB levels at the landfill were in excess
         of 1.0  ug/rn3.  These  levels  must be considered relatively high
         since they  exceed  the  maximum permissible 8-hour exposure level for
         industrial  workers  (OSHA,  1977).  Samples taken at the same location
         during  the  winter  when the ground was  frozen indicate that ambient
         air levels  of PCB  over the landfill are substantially lower than dur-
         ing the summer (0.02 ug/m3).   There is some evidence of low-level
         airborne emissions  of  PCB  from the landfill even during the winter
         however.

    10.  Results of  the air  samples taken in January, 1978, indicate that the
         municipal sewage sludge incinerator is a low-level PCB emitter, while
         Aerovox Corporation appears  to substantially increase downwind ambi-
         ent levels  of PCB.  Cornell-Dubilier Electronics Corporation had no
         detectable  emissions  at the  time of sampling.

     The results of  this survey indicate there  is migration of PCB from the
New Bedford landfill.  Although PCB has migrated to shallow ground waters
immediately adjacent to the  landfill,  the extent of groundwater contamination
appears to be restricted to  a  very  limited area.  Transport of PCB in the
ground water is  probably limited by the high absorption capacity of the peaty
soils in the area plus the  likelihood the landfill is located on a groundwater
discharge area rather than  a recharge area.

     PCBs have migrated from the landfill into  the surface water and biologi-
cal systems of Apponagansett Swamp.   Soils, sediments,  and benthic organisms
in the swamp are contaminated  with  PCB.  This contamination appears to be
limited to the area  north of 1-195.   Again, highly-absorptive, peaty soils
probably limit physical transport of  PCB.  Bioaccumulation of PCB is demon-
strated by the relatively high  levels detected  in benthic organisms within the
swamp.  Transport of this contamination up the  food chain to the more mobile
biological organisms (i.e.,  fish) is  occurring.  Herring gulls may be accumu-
lating substantial levels of PCB contamination  in their eggs as a result of
their feeding at the landfill.
                                   38

-------
     Ambient  air  analysis  indicates  volatilization is a likely and possibly
principal mode  of transport  of  PCB from the landfill.  There is insufficient
data to determine the  rate of  this transport;  however, it is substantially
greater during  the  summer  than  during the winter, as may be expected since
ambient temperatures  are higher.
                                       39

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                           (Pleas* re*d Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 REPORT NO.
    560/6-78-006
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE ANO SUBTITLE
Environmental Assessment of  Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs)Near  New Bedford, MA Municipal Landfill
            t. REPORT DATE
             May 26. 1978
            A. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 '. AUTHOR
-------