United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-99-032a
August 1999
Air
&EPA
Primary Lead Smelter
Doe Run
Herculaneum, Missouri
Volume I of
-------
FINAL REPORT
PRIMARY LEAD SMELTER
DOE RUN
HERCULANEUM, MISSOURI
VOLUME I OF III
TEXT AND APPENDIX A
EPA Contract No. 68D70069
Work Assignment No. 2-09
Prepared for:
Thomas J. Logan (MD-14)
Work Assignment Manager
SCGB, EMC, EMAD, OAQPS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
August 1999
P:\I529\FINRPT\DOERUNYTEXT.WPD
Submitted by:
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
5001 S. Miami Blvd., Suite 300
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077
(919)941-0333 FAX (919) 941-0234
-------
DISCLAIMER
This document was prepared by Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) under EPA
Contract No. 68D70069, Work Assignment No. 2-09. This document has passed PES' '
internal quality assurance review and has been approved for distribution. The contents of this
document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. EPA. Mention of trade
names does not constitute endorsement by the EPA or PES.
n
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
VOLUME I
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2-1
2.1 EMISSIONS TEST LOG 2-1
2.2 NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET 2-1
2.3 BLAST FURNACE OUTLETS 2-19
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 4-1
4.1 BLAST FURNACE OUTLETS 4-1
4.2 NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET . 4-4
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 5-1
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND SAMPLE/
VELOCITY TRAVERSE POINTS 5-1
5.2 DETERMINATION OF FLUE GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE 5-1
5.3 DETERMINATION OF FLUE GAS DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT 5-4
5.4 DETERMINATION OF FLUE GAS MOISTURE CONTENT 5-4
5.5 DETERMINATION OF CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATION ... 5-4
5.6 DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS (VOHAPS) 5-5
5.7 DETERMINATION OF SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC HAZARDOUS
AIR POLLUTANTS (SVOHAPS) 5-5
5.8 DETERMINATION OF ALDEHYDES AND KETONES 5-8
5.9 DETERMINATION OF GASEOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY
DIRECT INTERFACE GC/MS 5-8
in
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
6.0
7.0
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Page
. 6-1
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) 7-1
7.1 CALIBRATION AND PREPARATION OF APPARATUS 7-1
7.2 REAGENTS AND GLASSWARE PREPARATION 7-4
7.3 ON-SITE SAMPLING 7-6
7.4 SAMPLE RECOVERY 7-9
7.5 ON-SITE ANALYSES 7-9
7.6 LABORATORY ANALYSIS 7-10
•APPENDIX A:
APPENDIX A.I:
APPENDIX A. 1.1:
APPENDIX A. 1.2:
APPENDIX A. 1.3:
APPENDIX A. 1.4:
APPENDIX A.2:
RAW FIELD DATA
RAW FIELD DATA, NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
RAW FIELD DATA, NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
VOLATILE ORGANIC HAPS
RAW FIELD DATA, NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC HAPS
RAW FIELD DATA, NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
ALDEHYDES AND KETONES
RAW FIELD DATA, NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
CO & FLUE GAS COMPOSITION
RAW FIELD DATA, NOS. 1, 2 AND 3 BLAST FURNACE
OUTLETS
A-l
VOLUME II
APPENDIX B:
APPENDIX B.I:
ANALYTICAL DATA
ANALYTICAL DATA, VOLATILE ORGANICS
B-l
VOLUME III
APPENDIX B.2:
APPENDIX B.3:
APPENDIX C:
APPENDIX C.I:
APPENDIX C.2:
APPENDIX C.3:
APPENDIX C.4:
ANALYTICAL DATA, SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYTICAL DATA, ALDEHYDES AND KETONES
CALCULATIONS
CALCULATIONS, VOLATILE ORGANICS
CALCULATIONS, SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
CALCULATIONS, ALDEHYDES AND KETONES
CALCULATIONS, VOLUMETRIC AIR FLOW RATES AND
MOISTURE
C-l
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Concluded)
APPENDIX D: QA/QC DATA D-l
APPENDIX E: GASEOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY DIRECT
INTERFACE GC/MS E-l
APPENDIX F: PROCESS DATA F-l
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Emissions Test Log, The Doe Run Company in Herculaneum, Missouri ... 2-2
Table 2.2 Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants Concentrations and
Emission Rates, No. 5 Baghouse Outlet, The Doe Run Company -
Herculaneum, MO 2-4
Table 2.3 Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants Concentrations and
Emission Rates, No. 5 Baghouse Outlet, The Doe Run Company -
Herculaneum, MO 2-10
Table 2.4 Aldehydes and Ketones Concentrations and Emission Rates, No. 5 Baghouse
Outlet, The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO 2-17
Table 2.5 Gaseous Organic Concentrations and Emission Rates by Direct Interface
GC/MS, No. 5 Baghouse Outlet, The Doe Run Company in
Herculaneum, MO 2-20
Table 2.6 Summary of Stack Gas Conditions and CO Concentrations, No. 5 Baghouse
Outlet, The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO 2-21
Table 2.7 Summary of Stack Gas Conditions, No. 1 Blast Furnace Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO 2-22
Table 2.8 Summary of Stack Gas Conditions, No. 3 Blast Furnace Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO 2-23
Table 3.1 Summary of Furnace Charge Data, Blast Furnace Nos. 1 and 3
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO 3-5
Table 5.1 Summary of Sampling and Analytical Methods, The Doe Run Company in
Herculaneum, Missouri 5-2
Table 5.2 Summary of Sampling Locations, Test Parameters, Test Methods,
and Number and Duration of Tests, The Doe Run Company in
Herculaneum, Missouri 5-3
Table 6.1 Statistical Analysis of Selected Organic Emission Rates, No. 5 Baghouse
Outlet, The Doe Run Company, Herculaneum, MO 6-2
Table 7.1 Direct Interface GC/MS Quality Assurance Results 7-2
Table 7.2 MM5 Field and Laboratory Blanks Results 7-3
Table 7.3 MM5 Surrogate Recovery Results 7-5
Table 7.4 VOST Field and Laboratory Blanks Results 7-8
Table 7.5 VOST Surrogate Recovery Results 7-11
Table 7.6 Method 0011 Field and Laboratory Blanks Results 7-12
Table 7.7 Method 0011 Field Spike Recovery Results 7-14
Table 7.8 VOST Surrogate Recovery Results 7-15
Table 7.9 Method 0011 Field and Laboratory Blank Results 7-17
Table 7.10 Method 0011 Field Spike Recovery Results 7-18
VI
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1.1 Process Air Flow Schematic and Sampling Locations for
The Doe Run Company Primary Lead Smelter Process in
Herculaneum, MO 1-2
Figure 1.2 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing at The Doe Run Company
in Herculaneum, MO, EPA Contract No. 68D20162, WA No. 4-07 1-3
Figure 3.1 Simplified Process Flow Dirgram for Primary Lead Smelting 3-2
Figure 3.3 Typcial Primary Lead Blast Furnace 3-3
Figure 3.3 Process Air Schematic for The Doe Run Company Primary Lead Smelter
Process in Herculaneum, MO 3-6
Figure 4.1 Blast Furnace Outlet Sampling Location, The Doe Run Company in
Herculaneum, MO 4-2
Figure 4.2 Blast Furnace Outlet Traverse Point Locations, The Doe Run Company
in Herculaneum, MO 4-3
Figure 4.3 No. 5 Baghouse Outlet Sampling Location, The Doe Run Company
in Herculaneum, MO 4-5
Figure 4.4 No. 5 Baghouse Outlet Traverse Point Locations, The Doe Run Company
in Herculaneum, MO 4-6
Figure 5.1 Sampling Train Schematic for Method 0030 "Volatile Organic
Sampling Train" (VOST) 5-6
Figure 5.2 Sampling Train Schematic for Method 0010 "Modified Method 5
Sampling Train" (MM5) 5-7
Figure 5.3 Sampling Train Schematic for Method 0011 "Sampling for Aldehyde
and Ketone Emissions from Stationary Sources" 5-9
Vlll
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Emission Standards Division
(ESD) is investigating the primary lead smelting source category to identify and quantify
organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted from blast furnaces. ESD asked EPA's
Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division (EMAD), and the Emission Measurement Center
(EMC) to conduct the required testing. EMC issued a work assignment to Pacific
Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) to plan and conduct the air emissions test program to
gather emissions data as specified in the ESD test request. The testing program was conducted
through EPA Contract No. 68D20162, Work Assignment No. 4-07.
The primary objective was to obtain data on the emissions of volatile and semi-volatile
organic HAPs, aldehydes, and ketones from primary lead smelter blast furnaces. A secondary
objective was to obtain data on the emissions of carbon monoxide. The data will be used by
ESD to determine whether organic HAPs are emitted at levels that would justify regulation
under the MACT program.
The Doe Run Company, which operates a primary lead smelter in Herculaneum,
Missouri was selected by the ESD as the host facility for this project. The Doe Run facility
operates three primary lead blast furnaces which smelt concentrated lead ore to produce
elemental lead. During normal operation two furnaces operate simultaneously with the third
furnace down for maintenance. All three furnaces are similar in design and operation. They are
semi-batch fed and are tapped continuously.
Air emissions from all three furnaces along with fugitive dust from a series of hygiene
ventilation systems are exhausted to a common baghouse and stack. In the stack several
independent process air exhausts are combined with the baghouse exhaust. In order to quantify
the furnace emissions, testing was performed in the baghouse exhaust instead of the stack. A
process air flow schematic is presented in Figure 1.1.
For this test program, PES employed five subcontractors: Emission Monitoring, Inc.
(EMI); Deeco, Inc. (DEECO); Triangle Laboratories, Inc. (TLI); Atlantic Technical Services,
Inc. (ATS) and Resolution Analytics, Inc. (RAI). EMI provided on-site sampling and analytical
support for determination of selected organic HAPs using a portable GC/MS, DEECO
provided on-site sampling support for the determination of aldehydes and ketones, TLI
analyzed test samples for volatile and semi-volatile organic HAPs by GC/MS, ATS provided
on-site sampling support for semi-volatile organic HAPs and report preparation support, and
RAI analyzed test samples for aldehydes and ketones by high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC).
The organization and major lines of communication for the test program are presented
in Figure 1.2.
1-1
-------
From Sulfuric
Acid Plant
\ •
04
Source Sampling for
Emission Rates of:
Volatile HAPs
Semi-volatile HAPs
Aldehydes
From No. 3 Baghouse
Source Sampling for:
Flue Gas Flow Rate
No. 5 Baghouse
A
L
From
Hygiene Ventilation
Hoods 1-4
A
/
No. 1
Blast
Furnace
t
i
No. 2
Blast
Furnace
^\
A
*--<-.
L
No. 3
Blast
Furnace
A
k
From
Hygiene Ventilation
Hoods 5-9
Figure 1.1 Process Air Flow Schematic and Sampling Location for
The Doe Run Company Primary Lead Smelter Process in Herculaneum, MO
-------
Doe Run Company
Jim Lanzafame
(314)479-5311
PES
OA/OC Officer
Wayne Westbrook
(703)471-8383
Pretest Site
Survey
PES
Site-Specific
Test Plan
PES
EPA/EMC
Work Assignment Manager
Thomas J. Logan
(919)541-2580
PES
Program Manager
John Chehaske
(703)471-8383
PES
Project Manager
Frank Phoenix
(919)941-0333
Field
Testing
PES
Subcontractors
Atlantic Technical Services, 1
Emission Monitoring Inc.-
DEECO
EPA/ESP
Kevin A. Cavender
(919)541-2364
Analyses
PES
Report
Preparation
PES
Subcontractors
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
Resolution Analytics, Inc.
Figure 1.2 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing at The Doe Run Company in Herculaneum, MO
-------
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
This section provides a discussion and summaries of the test results from the testing
program at the Doe Run Company facility hi Herculaneum, Missouri. Included are results of
the tests conducted for volatile organic HAPs, semivolatile organic HAPs, carbon monoxide,
aldehydes, and ketones. Field data, analytical data, calculations, and QA/QC data are provided
in Appendices A through D, respectively. The report covering determination of gaseous
organic compounds by direct interface Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) is
presented in its entirety hi Appendix E.
2.1 EMISSIONS TEST LOG
PES and its subcontractors conducted emissions sampling over a two day period
beginning June 25,1997. Two test sets per day were performed by the test team at the No. 5
baghouse outlet that controls emissions from the blast furnaces. The team also conducted
concurrent flow rate determinations at the Nos. 1 and 3 blast furnace outlets. The No. 2 blast
furnace was shut down for maintenance during the test program. Flow rate determinations
conducted at the No. 2 blast furnace outlet prior to testing and at the completion of testing
confirmed the absence of flow from the furnace. Table 2.1 presents an emissions test log
which summarizes, by location, the test program's run numbers, test dates, test objectives, and
run tunes.
2.2 NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
»
2.2.1 Volatile Organic Haps
The volatile organic hazardous air pollutants (VOHAPS) were determined by EPA
Method 0030 using a Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) which speciates and
quantitates low concentrations of volatile organics with boiling points below about 100°C.
The results of the test program for quantifying volatile organics emissions are shown hi
Table 2.2. Since each VOST run consisted of four 12-minute samples, the emission rates and
concentrations from the four samples were averaged to calculate an average value for each of
the four runs.
2-1
-------
TABLE 2.1
EMISSIONS TEST LOG
THE DOE RUN COMPANY IN HERCULANEUM, MISSOURI
Test Location
No. 5 Baghouse
Outlet
Test Objective
Semi-Volatile
HAPS
Volatile HAPS
Specific Volatile
HAPs
Aldehydes and
Ketones
Oxygen and
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon Monoxide
Test Date
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
Run Number
MM5-1
MM5-2
MM5-3
MM5-4
V-l-1
V-l-2
V-l-3
V-l-4
V-2-1
V-2-2
V-2-3
V-2-4
V-3-1
V-3-2
V-3-3
V-3-4
V-4-1
V-4-2
V-4-3
V-4-4
GC-1
GC-2
GC-3
M0011-1
MOO 11 -2
MOO 11 -3
MOO 11 -4
M3-1
M3-2
M3-3
M3-4
M10-1
M10-2
M10-3
Ml 0-4
Run Times
0955-1233
1455-1713
0915-1148
1410-1626
1000-1012
1014-1026
1034-1046
1057-1109
1457-1509
1513-1525
1531-1543
1548-1600
0916-0928
0931-0943
0946-0958
1001-1013
1410-1422
1424-1436
1445-1457
1459-1511
10:20-12:57
15:07-16:54
9:24-11:14
0954-1237
1455-1715
0914-1134
1411-1625
1035-1150
1530-1600
0915-1030
1445-1530
1035-1150
1530-1600
0915-1030
1445-1530
2-2
-------
TABLE 2.1 (Concluded)
EMISSIONS TEST LOG
THE DOE RUN COMPANY IN HERCULANEUM, MISSOURI
No. 1 Blast Furnace
Outlet
No 2 Blast Furnace
Outlet
No. 3 Blast Furnace
Outlet
Volumetric Air
Flow Rates
Oxygen and
Carbon Dioxide
Moisture
Volumetric Air
Flow Rates
Volumetric Air
Flow Rates
Oxygen and
Carbon Dioxide
Moisture Content
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/23/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
6/25/97
6/26/97
1-M2-1
l-M2-2-Pre
l-M2-2-Post
1-M2-3
l-M2-4-Pre
l-M2-4-Post
1-M3-1
1-M3-2
1-M3-3
l:M3-4
1-M4-1
1-M4-2
1-M4-3
1-M4-4
2-M2-1
2-M2-4
3-M2-1
3-M2-2-Pre
3-M2-2-Post
3-M2-3
3-M2-4-Pre
3-M2-4-Post
3-M3-1
3-M3-2
3-M3-3
3-M3-4
3-M4-1
3-M4-2
3-M4-3
3-M4-4
1007
1448
1816
0825
1348
1646
0955-1055
1659-1750
0942-1042
1413-1513
0955-1055
1659-1750
0942-1042
1413-1513
1808
1641
1040
1430
1740
0907
1419
1631
0955-1055
1543-1643
0936-1036
1430-1530
0955-1055
1543-1643
0936-1036
1430-1530
2-3
-------
Table 2.2
Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
V-l
V-2
V-3
V-4
Average
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
8.18E-KK)
2.81E-02
(2.87E-01)
{8.98E-04}
(6.63E-02)
{2.99E-04}
5.46E+01
2.52E-01
{3.10E-02}
{2.99E-04}
(2.01E-02)
{2.99E-04}
1.03E+00
5.78E-03
1.13E+01
3.89E-02
8.33E-OI
3.54E-03
2.15E+01
9.68E-02
9.18E-02
8.34E-04
1.87E-01
I.24E-03
1.32E-01
5.01E-04
B
B
J
J
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
6.73E+00
2.35E-02
5.64E-01
1.80E-03
{8.24E-02}
{3.79E-04}
7.90E+01
3.71E-01
{3.12E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{2.02E-02}
{3.07E-04}
9.63E-01
5.50E-03
1.09E+01
3.80E-02
7.30E-OI
3.16E-03
3.41E-HH
1.S6E-01
{3.32E-02}
{3.07E-04}
1.93E-01
1.30E-03
3.26E-01
1.27E-03
B
B
E
E
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
E
E
J
J
J
J
J
J
7.22E+00
2.42E-02
2.13E-H)2
6.54E-01
{5.22E-02}
{2.31E-04}
5.45E+01
2.46E-01
{2.44E-02}
(2.31E-04)
{1.58E-02}
{2.31E-04}
8.76E-01
4.81E-03
3.31E-K)!
1.11E-01
9.I6E-OI
3.82E-03
4.95E+01
2.18E-01
8.76E-02
7.79E-04
3.57E-01
2.32E-03
2.39E+00
8.90E-03
BJ
BJ
E
E
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
J
J
3.26E+00
1.12E-02
1.02E+02
3.20E-01
{5.39E-02}
{2.43E-04}
6.15E401
2.83E-01
{2.52E-02}
{2.43E-04}
(1.63E-02)
{2.43E-04}
9.44E-01
5.28E-03
2.18E+01
7.45E-02
I.19E-KX)
5.06E-03
2.72E-KH
1.22E-01
(2.68E-02)
{2.43E-04}
2.67E-01
1.77E-03
7.02E+00
2.67E-02
BJ
BJ
JE
JE
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
E
E
J
J
J
J
J
J
6.35E-KH)
2.17E-02
7.91E-K)!
2.44E-01
{6.37E-02}
{2.88E-04}
6.24E+01
2.88E-01
{2.79E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{1.81E-02}
(2.70E-04)
9.54E-01
5.34E-03
V.93E+01
6.56E-02
9.I8E-01
3.90E-03
3.31E+01
1.48E-01
4.49E-02
4.03E-04
2.51E-01
1.66E-03
2.47E-KK)
9.33E-03
Acetone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Acrylonitrile
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Allyl chloride
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Bromodichloromethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Bromoform
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Bromomethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
13-Butadiene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2-Butanone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Carbon disulfide
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Carbon tetrachloride
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Chlorobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Chloroethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit.
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-4
-------
Table 2.2
Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
V-l
y-2
y-3
V-4
Average
]
J
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.42E-01
l.OOE-03
1.43E+01
4.25E-02
2.43E-01
1.73E-03
{2.44E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{S.12E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{5.13E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{5.23E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{5.23E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{5.23E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{4.49E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{4.S7E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{4.57E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{2.11E-01}
{8.98E-04}
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{4.28E-02}
{3.07E-04}
1.39E-KH
4.22E-02
2.44E-01
1.77E-03
{2.46E-02}
(3.07E-04)
{5.17E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{5.17E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{5.27E^)2}
{3.07E-04}
{5.27E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{5.27E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{4.53E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{4.61E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{4.61E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{2.29E-01 }
{9.94E-04}
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{3.35E-02}
{2.31E-04}
1.72E-HH
5.03E-02
1.43E-01
9.91E-04
{1.92E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{4.04E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{4.04E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{4.12E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{4.12E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{4.12E-02}
{2.31E-04}
(3.54E-02)
{2.31E-04}
{3.60E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{3.60E-02}
(2.31E-04)
{1.66E-01J
{6.93E-04}
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{3.45E-02}
{2.43E-04}
1.91E+01
5.69E-02
1.59E-01
1.12E-03
{1.98E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{4.16E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{4.17E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{4.2SE-02}
{2.43E-04}
(4.25E-02)
{2.43E-04}
{4.25E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{3.6SE-02}
(2.43E-04)
{3.71E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{3.71E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{1.71E-01}
{7.28E-04}
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.55E-02
2.51E-04
1.61E+01
4.80E-02
1.97E-01
1.40E-03
{2.20E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{4.62E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{4.62E-02J
{2.70E-04}
{4.72E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{4.72E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{4.72E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{4.05E-02}
{2.70E-04}
{4.12E^)2}
{2.70E-04}
{4.12E-02}
{2.70E^4}
{I.94E-01}
{8.28E-04}
Chloroform
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Cbloromethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Curoene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Dibromochlororaethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,1-Dicbloroethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,2-DIcbloroethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,1-Dichloroethene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
cis-l^-DIchloroethene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1^-Dichloropropane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
cis-13-Dichloropropene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
trans-l^-Dlchloropropene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1^-Epoxybutane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-5
-------
Table 2.2
Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet'
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
V-l
V-2
V-3
V-4
Average
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
E
E
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.02E-01
1.19E-03
2.46E+00
1.54E-02
{2.70E-02}
{2.99E-04}
2.88E+01
1.46E-01
{5.06E-02}
{2.99E-04}
(3.57E-02)
{2.99E-04}
9.28E-01
6.26E-03
8.14E-KX)
4.14E-02
{5.06E-02}
{2.99E-04}
8.30E+01
4.16E-01
1.15E+01
7.08E-02
{5.75E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{3.02E-02}
{2.99E-04}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
BE
BE
ND
ND
J
J
{5.11E-02}
{3.07E-04}
3.43E-HX)
2.19E-02
{2.72E-02}
{3.07E-04}
1.87E401
9.70E-02
{5.11E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{3.60E-02}
{3.07E-04}
3.97E-01
2.73E-03
6.30E+00
3.26E-02
{5.11E-02}
{3.07E-04}
3.00E401
1.53E-01
1.35E+01
8.47E-02
{5.80E-02}
{3.07E-04}
1.23E-01
1.2SE-03
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
E
E
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
BE
BE
E
E
ND
ND
ND
ND
{3.99E-02}
{2.31E-04}
2.98E+00
1.83E-02
{2.13E-02}
{2.31E-04}
3.45E-HH
1.72E-01
{3.99E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{2.82E-02}
{2.31E-04}
8.26E-01
5.45E-03
1.55E+00
7.73E-03
{3.99E-02}
(2.31E-04)
7.J1E+01
3.49E-01
2.50E+01
1.51E-01
{4.53E-02}
{2.31E-04}
{2.38E-02}
{2.31E-04}
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
{4.12E-02}
{2.43E-04}
2.36E-KX)
1.47E-02
{2.19E-02}
{2.43E-04}
1.33E-KH
6.76E-02
{4.12E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{2.90E-02}
{2.43E-04}
2.39E-01
1.60E-03
4.43E-KX)
2.24E-02
(4.12E-02)
{2.43E-04}
2.01E+OI
l.OOE-01
8.00E400
4.90E-02
{4.68E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{2.46E-02}
{2.43E-04}
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
E
E
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
BE
BE
E
E
ND
ND
J
J
5.05E-02
2.99E-04
2.81E+00
I.76E-02
{2.44E-02}
{2.70E-04}
2.38E+01
1.21E-01
{4.57E-02}
{2.70E-04}
(3.22E-02)
(2.70E-04)
5.97E-01
4.01E-03
5.11E-KK)
2.60E-02
{4.57E-02}
{2.70E-04}
5.10E+01
2.55E-01
1.45E+01
8.88E-02
{5.I9E-02}
{2.70E-04}
3.09E-02
3.12E-04
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Ethylbenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Ethylene dibromide
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
n-Hexane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2-Hexanone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
loidomethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
booctane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Methyl methacrylate
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Methylene chloride
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Styrene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Tert-butyl methyl ether
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-6
-------
Table 2.2
Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
V-l
V-2
y-3
V-4
Average
Tetrachloroethene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Toluene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,1,2-Trichloroetbane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Trlchloroethene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr .
Trichlorofluoromethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Vinyl acetate
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Vinyl bromide
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Vinyl chloride
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
m-/p-Xylene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
o-Xylene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Total VOHAPS
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND
ND
B
B
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
EJ
EJ
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
{3.06E-02}
{2.99E-04}
1.60E+01
8.72E-02
1.18E-01
9.28E-04
{3.80E-02}
{2.99E-04}
(3.86E-02)
{2.99E-04}
2.45E401
1.98E-01
{5.89E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{4.74E-02}
{2.99E-04}
{8.11E-02}
{2.99E-04}
4.98E-HOO
3.12E-02
1.85E+00
1.16E-02
J
J
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
5.16E-02
5.15E-04
2.33E-H)!
1.29E-01
{3.83E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{3.83E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{3.89E-02}
{3.07E-04}
2.05E-HK)
1.69E-02
{5.94E-02}
{3.07E-04}
{4.78E-02}
{3.07E-04}
(8.18E-02)
{3.07E-04}
6.85E+00
4.37E-02
3.06E+00
1.9SE-02
ND
ND
BE
BE
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
{2.41E-02}
{2.31E-04}
2.28E401
1.21E-01
3.66E-02
2.82E-04
(3.00E-02)
{2.31E-04}
{3.04E-02}
{2.31E-04}
1.68E-KK)
1.34E-02
(4.64E-02)
{2.31E-04}
{3.74E-02}
(2.31E-04)
(6.39E-02)
{2.31E-04}
6.31E-HK)
3.87E-02
2.18E-KX)
1.33E-02
ND
ND
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{2.49E-02}
{2.43E-04}
2.11E+01
1.15E-01
{3.09E-02}
{2.43E-04}
(3.09E-02)
{2.43E-04}
8.54E-03
6.60E-05
9.47E-01
7.66E-03
{4.79E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{3.85E-02}
{2.43E-04}
{6.60E-02}
{2.43E-04}
6.23E+00
3.90E-02
2.60E-HK)
1.63E-02
J
J
BE
BE
J
J
ND
ND
J
J
EJ
EJ
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
J
J
J
1.29E-02
1.29E-04
2.08E+01
1.13E-01
3.86E-02
3.03E-04
{3.43E-02}
{2.70E-04}
2.13E-03
1.65E-05
7.29E+00
5.91E-02
{5.32E-02}
{2.70E-04}
(4.28E-02)
{2.70E-04}
{7.32E-02}
{2.70E-04}
6.10E+00
3.82E-02
2.42E+00
1.52E-02
1.50
1.25
2.21
1.34
1.58
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-7
-------
About one half of the target compounds were not detected. The detection limits ranged
from 0.001 to 0.004 jag per sample, depending on the compound, which relates to
approximately 0.05 to 0.2 parts per billion. In cases where the target compounds were not
detected, emission rates and concentrations were calculated using the analytical detection
limits, flagged with a "ND" prefix and all calculated values were enclosed by brackets ({}). If
a compound was not detected in a sample, it was averaged as a zero in the four-sample run
average. If a compound was not detected in all four samples within a run, the emission rates
and concentrations calculated from the detection limits were averaged, prefixed with a "ND",
and the values presented in brackets. If a compound was not detected in all four runs, the
emission rates and concentrations, calculated from the detection limits, were averaged,
prefixed with a "ND", presented in brackets, and the compound's emission rate excluded from
the total volatile HAP emission rate calculation.
The sampling and analytical procedures for this test program were designed such that
the VOST samples would be collected at a range where compound analyses for the compounds
identified in the preliminary tests would fall in between the upper and lower quantitation limits
for SW-846 Method 8240. The upper and lower quantitation limits for SW-846 Method 8240
are 1.0 ug/sample and 0.05 |j.g/sample, respectively. For the most part compound analyses fell
within these limits. But for a few compounds, values were reported that were below the
quantitation limit but above the detection limit. These values were reported as estimates and
flagged with a "J" to indicate that the compound was detected but was below the quantitation
limit. The "J" prefix was added to the four-sample average if pertinent to any of the four
samples.
For some compounds, the quantitation limit was exceeded and catch weights greater
than 1 ug/sample were reported. For these compounds the catch weights were flagged with an
"E" and the values reported as estimates. The "E" prefix was added to the four-sample
average if pertinent to any of the four samples.
A third flag, "B", was used to indicate compounds detected in the sample that were
also detected in the laboratory blanks (sample ID VOSTBLK 070897 and 070997). Acetone,
benzene, toluene, and methylene chloride were detected in both laboratory blanks, but at
amounts below the quantitation limit. TLI's case narrative, that precedes their analytical .
results, advises that target analytes in the laboratory blanks should not be considered as truly
present in the native samples unless found at five times the amount found in the blank. In the
case of acetone, all of the samples had detected amounts that were less than five times the
VOST blank and therefore acetone should not be considered truly present in the native sample.
TLI's case narrative also advises that "in the event that the amount of a target analyte found in
the samples is twenty times the amount found in the associated blank, the contribution from
the blank can be considered negligible." The amounts of benzene, toluene, and methylene
chloride detected in the samples were all greater than 20 times the VOST blank except for
VOST run 3, set 2, where the detected benzene amount was 17 times the blank amount. The
"B" prefix was added to the four-sample average if pertinent to any of the four samples.
2-8
-------
2.2.1.1 Tentatively Identified Compounds. In addition to the target compounds, up to
ten of the largest non-target peaks observed in the chromatograms were approximated by
comparison with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (MIST) mass spectral
library and reported as tentatively identified compounds (TICs). The TIC list follows the
target list in the analytical report and includes the best fit TIC name, retention time and area,
and the internal standard retention time and area. Since each of the sixteen VOST samples
had its own TIC list, an emission rate was not calculated for each of the tentatively identified
compounds. Instead the reported masses of the 10 compounds were summed and a total TIC
mass emission rate was calculated for each VOST sample.(The average total volatile TIC mass
emission rate for the test program of 1.38 pounds per hour (Ib/hr) or approximately 6.04 tons
per year (TPY). Calculation of the volatile TICs emissions follows the target semivolatiles in
Appendix C.I.)
2.2.2 Semi-volatile Organic HAPs
The semivolatile organic hazardous air pollutants (SVOHAPS) were collected using a
SW-846 Method 0010 Modified Method 5 (MM5) sampling train. The MM5 sampling train
collects organic-laden particulate materials and semi-volatile organics species. This method
speciates and quantitates low concentrations of these semi-volatile organics with boiling
points above about 100 °C. The results of the semivolatile organic emissions are shown in
Table 2.3.
Analysis was performed for 70 target compounds. Of these, 50 target compounds were
not detected. Like the volatile organics results, if a compound was not detected, the emission
rate and concentration was calculated using the analytical detection limit, flagged with a "ND"
prefix and all values and calculated results were enclosed by brackets ({}). If a compound was
not detected in one of the four runs, a zero was used in the four-run average for that
compound. If a compound was not detected in all four runs, the four-run average was based
on the average of the four values calculated from the analytical detection limit, prefixed with a
"ND", presented in brackets, and was excluded from the total semivolatile HAP emission rate
calculations.
Analysis for the SVOHAPS was performed using SW-846 Method 8270. The lower
quantitation limit for SW-846 Method 8270 for all but three compounds was 10 ug/sample.
The three compounds, 2,4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol, and 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol, had
quantitation limits of 25 ug/sample. For 11 of the target compounds the reported values were
below the quantitation limit but above the detection limit. Like the volatile compounds, these
values were reported as estimates and flagged with a "J" to indicate that the compound was
detected but was below the quantitation limit. The "J" prefix was added to the four-run
average if pertinent to any of the four samples. SW-846 Method 8270 does not have an upper
quantitation limit.
2-9
-------
Acenaphthene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Acenaphthylene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Acetophenone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
4-Aminobiphenyl
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Aniline
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
o-Anisidine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Anthracene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzidine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzo(a)anthracene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzo(k)fluorantbene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzo(a)pyrene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Table 23
Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
MM5-1
J l.OOE-01
J 9.12E-04
J 1.63E-01
J 1.48E-03
B 2.19E+00
B 1.55E-02
MM5-2
J 8.40E-02
J 7.79E-04
MM5-3
J 8.75E-02
J 7.80E-04
J 1.04E-01
J 9.43E-04
J
J
B
B
1.71E-01
1.58E-03
2.06E+00
1.49E-02
J
J
B
B
4.52E-01
4.03E-03
2.28E+00
1.59E-02
J
J
B
B
2.66E-01
2.42E-03
2.26E+00
1.60E-02
Average*
J 9.39E-02
J 8.53E-04
J 2.63E-01
J 2.38E-03
B
B
2.20E-KM)
1.56E-02
ND {1.57E-02} ND {1.42E-02} ND {1.64E-02} ND {1.55E-02} ND {1.55E-02}
ND {1.57E-04} ND {1.45E-04} ND {1.60E-04} ND {1.54E-04} ND {1.54E-04}
ND {3.57E-02} ND {3.40E-02} ND {3.89E-02} ND {3.64E-02} ND {3.62E-02}
ND {1.96E-04} ND {1.90E-04} ND {2.09E-04} ND {1.99E-04} ND {1.99E-04}
ND {4.44E-02} ND {4.04E-02} ND {4.88E-02} ND {4.50E-02} ND {4.46E-02}
ND {3.23E-04} ND {2.99E-04} ND {3.47E-04} ND {3.26E-04} ND {3.24E-04}
J 4.60E-02
J 4.84E-04
1.86E-02
1.99E-04
2.68E-02
2.76E-04
4.02E-02
4.22E-04
J 3.29E-02
J 3.45E-04
ND {3.13E-02} ND {2.45E-02} ND {3.26E-02} ND {2.97E-02} ND {2.95E-02}
ND {3.40E-04} ND {2.72E-04} ND {3.47E-04} ND {3.22E-04} ND {3.20E-04}
J 2.59E-02
J 3.49E-04
ND {1.25E-02}
ND {1.72E-04}
ND {1.65E-02}
ND {2.18E-04}
ND {1.48E-02}
ND {1.99E-04}
J 6.47E-03
J 8.72E*-05
ND {2.05E-02} ND {2.33E-02} ND {2.02E-02} ND {2.01E-02} ND {2.10E-02}
ND {3.05E-04} ND {3.53E-04} ND {2.94E-04} ND {2.99E-04} ND (3.13E-04)
ND {2.14E-02} ND {2.42E-02} ND {2.11E-02} ND {2.11E-02}
ND {3.18E-04} ND {3.67E-04} ND {3.07E-04} ND {3.13E-04}
ND {2.62E-02} ND {2.94E-02} ND {2.57E-02} ND {2.59E-02}
ND {4.28E-04} ND {4.89E-04} ND {4.10E-04} ND {4.22E-04}
ND {2.19E-02}
ND {3.26E-04}
ND {2.68E-02}
ND {4.37E-04}
ND {2.40E-02} ND {2.72E-02} ND {2.35E-02} ND {2.38E-02} ND {2.46E-02}
ND {3.58E-04} ND {4.12E-04} ND {3.43E-04} ND {3.54E-04} ND {3.67E-04}
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit.
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-10
-------
Table 23
Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
MMS-2
MM5-3
MM5-4
Average*
Benzo(e)pyrene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzyl Chloride
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Biphenyl
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2-Chloroacetophenone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
bis-(2-ChloroethyI)ether
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2-ChIoronaphthalene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Chrysene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Cumene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Dibenzofuran
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND {2.55E-02}
ND {3.80E-04}
ND {2.10E-02}
ND {1.57E-04}
2.16E+00
1.96E-02
ND {1.82E-02}
ND {1.66E-04}
ND {4.80E-02}
ND {4.06E-04}
ND {1.82E-02}
ND {1.74E-04}
ND {1.65E-02}
ND {2.22E-04}
J 7.75E-02
J 5.50E-04
ND {3.00E-02}
ND (4.93E-04)
5.72E-01
5.68E-03
ND {2.86E-02}
ND {4.35E-04}
ND {1.96E-02}
ND {1.49E-04}
1.68E+00
1.56E-02
ND {1.61E-02}
ND {1.49E-04}
ND {4.47E-02}
ND {3.85E-04}
ND {1.62E-02}
ND {1.58E-04}
ND {1.29E-02}
ND {1.77E-04}
J 6.89E-02
J 4.98E-04
ND {3.38E-02}
ND {5.66E-04}
5.10E-01
5.I6E-03
ND {2.48E-02}
ND {3.61E-04}
ND {2.31E-02}
ND {1.69E-04}
1.95E+00
1.74E-02
ND {1.94E-02}
ND {1.74E-04}
ND {5.23E-02}
ND {4.32E-04}
ND {1.94E-02}
ND {1.83E-04}
ND {1.72E-02}
ND {2.27E-04}
J 1.01E-01
J 6.99E-04
ND {2.94E-02}
ND {4.72E-04}
5.47E-01
5.32E-03
ND {2.50E-02}
ND {3.72E-04}
ND {2.13E-02}
ND {1.59E-04}
2.75E+00
2.49E-02
ND {1.84E-02}
ND {1.68E-04}
ND {4.85E-02}
ND {4.08E-04}
ND {1.85E-02}
ND {1.77E-04}
ND {1.55E-02}
ND {2.08E-04}
J 3.72E-02
J 2.63E-04
ND {2.96E-02}
ND {4.85E-04}
4.83E-01
4.78E-03
ND {2.60E-02}
ND {3.87E-04}
ND {2.13E-02}
ND {1.59E-04}
2.13E+00
1.94E-02
ND {1.80E-02}
ND {1.64E-04}
ND {4.84E-02}
ND {4.08E-04}
ND {1.81E-02}
ND {1.73E-Q4}
ND {1.55E-02}
ND {2.09E-04}
J 7.11E-02
J 5.02E-04
ND {3.07E-02}
ND {5.04E-04}
S.28E-01
5.24E-03
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Di-n-butylphthalate
. Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND {3.97E-02}
ND {5.54E-04}
B 5.19E-01
B 8.54E-03
J 5.98E-02
J 5.19E-04
ND {3.70E-02}
ND {5.25E-04}
JB 1.62E-01
JB 2.72E-03
J 5.22E-02
J 4.62E-04
ND {4.34E-02}
ND {5.92E-04}
JB 2.13E-01
JB 3.42E-03
J 3.83E-02
J 3.25E-04
ND {4.01E-02}
ND {5.57E-04}
JB 2.67E-01
JB 4.38E-03
J 3.20E-02
J 2.76E-04
ND {4.00E-02}
ND {5.57E-04}
JB 2.90E-01
JB 4.76E-03
J 4.56E-02
J 3.96E-04
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-11
-------
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
N,N-Diethylaniline
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Dimethylaminoazobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
N,N-Dimetbylaniline
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Dimethylphthaiate
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Fluoranthene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Fluorene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Table 2 J
Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
MM5-1
ND {5.43E-02}
ND {8.11E-04}
ND {1.88E-02}
ND {1.66E-04}
ND {5.75E-02}
ND {8.29E-04}
ND {4.30E-02}
ND {5.71E-04}
ND {2.32E-02}
ND {1.66E-04}
ND {3.65E-02}
ND {4.58E-04}
ND {1.52E-02}
ND {1.74E-04}
ND {7.91E-02}
ND {9.25E-04}
ND {1.42E-01}
ND {1.55E-03}
ND {4.66E-02}
ND {5.02E-04}
JB
JB
1.55E-01
3.58E-03
J 2.82E-01
J 3.36E-03
J 2.81E-01
J 2.76E-03
MM5-2
MMS-3
MM5-4
Average*
ND {4.25E-02} ND (5.60E-02) ND {5.08E-02} ND {5.09E-02}
ND {6.48E-04} ND {8.20E-04} ND {7.57E-04} ND {7.59E-04}
ND {1.72E-02} ND {2.01E-02} ND {1.86E-02} ND {1.87E-02}
ND {1.54E-04} ND {1.74E-04} ND {1.63E-04} ND {1.64E-04}
ND {4.53E-02} ND {5.96E-02} ND {5.42E-02} ND {5.42E-02}
ND {6.66E-04} ND {8.42E-04} ND {7.80E-04} ND {7.79E-04}
ND {3.38E-02} ND {4.41E-02} ND {4.03E-02} ND {4.03E-02}
ND {4.57E-04} ND {5.75E-04} ND {5.35E-04} ND {5.35E-04}
ND {2.11E-02} ND {2.54E-02} ND {2.35E-02} ND {2.33E-02}
ND {1.54E-04} ND {1.78E-04} ND {1.68E-04} ND {1.66E-04}
ND {2.87E-02} ND {3.78E-02} ND {3.41E-02} ND {3.43E-02}
ND {3.67E-04} ND {4.63E-04} ND {4.26E-04} ND {4.29E-04}
ND {1.36E-02} ND {1.63E-02} J 3.61E-02 J 9.02E-03
ND {1.58E-04} ND {1.83E-04} J 4.12E-04 J 1.03E-04
ND {7.07E-02} ND {8.48E-02} ND {7.97E-02} ND {7.86E-02}
ND {8.42E-04} ND {9.71E-04} ND {9.29E-04} ND {9.17E-04}
ND {1.28E-01} ND {1.53E-01} ND {1.43E-01} ND {1.42E-01}
ND {1.41E-03} ND {1.63E-03} ND {1.55E-03} ND {1.54E-03}
ND {4.18E-02} ND (4.99E-02) ND {4.69E-02} ND {4.63E-02}
ND {4.57E-04} ND {5.26E-04} ND {5.03E-04} ND {4.97E-04}
JB
JB
6.77E-02
1.59E-03
J 6.96E-02
J 8.47E-04
J 1.93E-01
J 1.93E-03
JB 9.06E-02
JB 2.04E-03
J 7.59E-02
J 8.86E-04
J 3.71E-01
J 3.56E-03
JB 9.80E-02
JB 2.25E-03
J 1.32E-01
J 1.57E-03
4.97E-01
4.86E-03
JB
JB
1.03E-01
2.37E-03
J 1.40E-01
J 1.67E-03
J 3.36E-01
J 3.28E-03
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit.
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-12
-------
Table 2.3
Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
Hexachlorobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Hexachlorobutadiene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Hexacbloroethane
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Hydroquinone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Isophorone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Methylene bis-chloroaniline
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
4,4'-Methylenedianiline
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2-Methylnaphthalene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2-Methylphenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
3/4-Methylphenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Naphthalene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
MM5-1
ND (2.62E-02)
ND {4.41E-04}
ND {3.14E-02}
ND {4.84E-04}
ND {2.71E-02}
ND {4.36E-04}
ND {3.56E-02}
ND {4.97E-04}
ND {5.70E-02}
ND {3.71E-04}
ND {2.16E-02}
ND {3.71E-04}
ND {2.08E-02}
ND {1.70E-04}
ND {9.I5E-02}
ND {1.44E-03}
ND {5.59E-02}
ND {6.54E-04}
1.21E+00
1.01E-02
7.75E-01
4.95E-03
1.60E+00
1.02E-02
B
B
4.23E-HX)
3.20E-02
MMS-2
ND {2.35E-02}
ND {4.03E-04}
ND {2.86E-02}
ND {4.48E-04}
ND {2.43E-02}
ND {3.98E-04}
ND {3.31E-02}
ND {4.71E-04}
ND {5.20E-02}
ND {3.44E-04}
ND {2.44E-02}
ND {4.26E-04}
ND {1.91E-02}
ND {1.58E-04}
ND {7.19E-02}
ND {1.15E-03}
ND {4.37E-02}
ND {5.21E-04}
1.12E+00
9.59E-03
J 2.25E-01
J 1.46E-03
7.03E-01
4.57E-03
B 4.43E+00
B 3.41E-02
MMS-3
MMS-4
Average*
ND {2.76E-02} ND {2.60E-02} ND {2.58E-02}
ND {4.54E-04} ND {4.35E-04} ND {4.33E-04}
ND {3.46E-02} ND {3.22E-02} ND {3.17E-02}
ND {5.21E-04} ND {4.94E-04} ND {4.87E-04}
ND {2.91E-02} ND {2.74E-02} ND {2.70E-02}
ND {4.59E-04} ND {4.40E-04} ND {4.33E-04}
ND {3.88E-02} ND {3.58E-02} ND {3.58E-02}
ND {5.30E-04} ' ND {4.99E-04} ND {4.99E-04}
ND {6.30E-02} ND {5.80E-02} ND {5.75E-02}
ND {4.01E-04} ND {3.76E-04} ND {3.73E-04}
ND {2.12E-02} ND {2.15E-02} ND {2.22E-02}
ND {3.56E-04} ND {3.67E-04} ND {3.80E-04}
ND {2.29E-02} ND {2.17E-02} ND {2.11E-02}
ND {1.83E-04} ND {1.77E-04} ND {1.72E-04}
ND {9.47E-02} ND {8.59E-02} ND {8.60E-02}
ND {1.46E-03} ND {1.35E-03} ND {1.35E-03}
ND (5.76E-02) ND {5.24E-02} ND {5.24E-02}
ND {6.59E-04} ND {6.12E-04} ND {6.12E-04}
1.75E+00
1.44E-02
8.00E-01
5.00E-03
1.43E+00
8.96E-03
B 5.89E+00
B 4.36E-02
1.28E+00
1.07E-02
J 6.73E-01
J 4.28E-03
1.58E+00
1.01E-02
B
B
3.45E-KH)
2.60E-02
1.34E+00
1.12E-02
J 6.18E-01
J 3.92E-03
1.33E+00
8.45E-03
B 4.50E+00
B 3.40E-02
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit.
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-13
-------
Table 23
Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
MMS-1
MMS-2
MM5-3
MMS-4
Average*
Nitrobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
4-Nitrobiphenyl
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
4-Nitrophenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
n-Nitrosomorphotine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Pentachlorophenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Perylene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Phenanthrene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Phenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
1,4-Phenylenediamine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Pyrene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
o-Toluidine
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
ND {2.76E-02} ND {2.51E-02} ND {3.07E-02} ND {2.81E-02} ND {2.79E-02}
ND {2.01E-04} ND {1.86E-04} ND {2.18E-04} ND {2.04E-04} ND {2.02E-04}
ND {3.75E-02} ND {4.35E-02} ND {5.10E-02} ND {4.79E-02} ND {4.50E-02}
ND {4.41E-04} ND {4.03E-04} ND {4.54E-04} ND {4.35E-04} ND {4.33E-04}
ND {9.13E-02}
ND {7.50E-04}
1.66E-01
1.39E-03
ND {9.81E-02}
ND {7.88E-04}
ND {9.19E-02}
ND {7.52E-04}
J 4.14E-02
J 3.46E-04
ND {1.09E-OI} ND {1.01E-01} ND {1.19E-01} ND {1.09E-01} ND {1.09E-01}
ND.{4.76E-04} ND {4.48E-04} ND {5.08E-04} ND {4.76E-04} ND {4.77E-04}
ND {7.38E-02} ND (6.87E-02) ND {8.03E-02} ND {7.36E-02} ND {7.41E-02}
ND {5.06E-04} ND {4.80E-04} ND {5.39E-04} ND {5.03E-04} ND {5.07E-04}
ND {7.83E-02} ND {7.04E-02} ND {8.22E-02} ND {7.72E-02} ND {7.70E-02}
ND {1.37E-03} ND {1.25E-03} ND {1.40E-03} ND {1.34E-03} ND {1.34E-03}
ND {4.41E-02} ND {3.96E-02} ND {4.60E-02} ND {4.34E-02} ND {4.33E-02}
ND {6.94E-04} ND {6.34E-04} ND {7.08E-04} ND {6.80E-04} ND {6.79E-04}
ND {2.84E-02}
ND {4.23E-04}
1.88E+00
1.98E-02
ND {3.22E-02}
ND {4.89E-04}
9.06E-01
9.71E-03
ND {2.78E-02}
ND {4.05E-04}
1.19E400
1.22E-02
ND {2.81E-02}
ND {4.17E-04}
1.49E+00
1.56E-02
B
B
8.84E+00
4.91E-02
B
B
8.24E+00
4.66E-02
B
B
6.63E+00
3.61E-02
B
B
6.05E+00
3.35E-02
ND {2.91E-02}
ND {4.34E-04}
1.37E+00
1.43E-02
B 7.44E+00
B 4.13E-02
ND {4.03E-02} ND {3.62E-02} ND {4.42E-02} ND (4.13E-02) ND {4.05E-02}
ND {2.57E-04} ND {2.35E-04} ND {2.76E-04} ND {2.63E-04} ND {2.58E-04}
J 1.25E-01
J 1.49E-03
3.76E-02
4.57E-04
3.13E-02
3.65E-04
5.79E-02
6.89E-04
J 6.29E-02
J 7.51E-04
ND {2.83E-02} ND {2.67E-02} ND {3.09E-02} ND {2.87E-02} ND {2.87E-02}
ND {1.79E-04} ND {1.72E-04} ND {1.92E-04} ND {1.81E-04} ND {1.81E-04}
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-14
-------
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2,4,5-TrichIorophenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
2,4,6-TrichIorophenol
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
a,a,a-TrichIoroto!uene
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Trifluralin
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Table 23
Semivolatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants
Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
MM5-1 MM5-2 MMS-3
MMS-4
Average*
ND {2.73E-02} ND {2.49E-02} ND {2.97E-02} ND {2.80E-02} ND {2.75E-02}
ND {2.92E-04} ND {2.72E-04} ND {3.12E-04} ND {2.99E4M} ND {2.94E-04}
ND {3.89E-02} ND {3.51E-02} ND {4.18E-02} ND {3.94E-02} ND {3.88E-02}
ND {4.54E-04} ND {4.17E-04} ND {4.77E-04} ND {4.58E-04} ' ND {4.51E-04}
ND {3.93E-02} ND {3.55E-02} ND {4.22E-02} ND {3.98E-02} ND {3.92E-02}
ND {4.58E-04} ND {4.21E-04} ND {4.81E-04} ND {4.62E-04} ND {4.56E-04}
ND {2.04E-02} ND {1.85E-02} ND {2.21E-02} ND {2.09E-02} ND {2.05E-02}
ND {2.36E-04} ND {2.17E-04} ND {2.49E-04} ND {2.40E-04} ND {2.36E-04}
ND {3.53E-02} ND {3.17E-02} ND {3.79E-02} ND {3.56E-02} ND {3.51E-02}
ND {6.98E-04} ND {6.38E-04} ND {7.35E-04} ND {7.03E-04} ND {6.93E-04}
Total SVOHAPs
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
0.191
0.154
0.175
0.164
0.171
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit.
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-15
-------
Like the volatile organics results, a "B" flag was used to indicate compounds detected
in the sample that were also detected in the laboratory blank (sample ID SBLK 070897). The
"B" prefix was added to the four-sample average if pertinent to any of the four samples.
Naphthalene, phenol, acetophenone, di-n-butylphthalate, and bis(2-Ethylhexl)phthalate were
detected in the laboratory blank, but at amounts below the quantitation limit. TLI's case
narrative advises that target analytes in the laboratory blanks should not be considered as truly
present in the native samples unless found at five times the amount found in the blank. In the
case of di-n-butylphthalate and bis(2-Ethylhexl)phthalate, the second through fourth run
samples-had estimated amounts that were less than five times the blank and therefore should
not be considered truly present in the native samples. The first run's sample (MM5-1) had a
detected amount of di-n-butylphthalate that was 8.3 times the estimated blank value and an
estimated amount of bis(2-Ethylhexl)phthalate that was 6.1 times the estimated blank value. In
the case of acetophenone all the detected samples were greater than five times the estimated
blank value. The TLI's case narrative also advises that "in the event that the amount of a target
analyte found in the samples is twenty times the amount found in the associated blank, the
contribution from the blank can be considered negligible." The amounts of naphthalene and
phenol detected in the samples were all greater than 20 times the estimated blank value.
2.2.2.1 Tentatively Identified Compounds. In addition to the target compounds, ten
TICs were reported with each of the MM5 samples. Since some of the TICs showed up in two
or more of the samples, emission rates were calculated for all 20 of the semivolatile TICs
reported. The total TICs emission rate for the semivolatile organics, based on the four-run
averages was 0.430 Ib/hr or approximately 1.88 TPY. Calculation of the semivolatile TICs
emissions follows the target semivolatiles in Appendix C.2.
2.2.3 Aldehydes and Ketones
The aldehydes and ketones were determined using BEF Method 0011. The method
states that compound detection limits as low as 1.8 parts per billion, by volume (ppbv), are
possible. The results of the aldehydes and ketones emissions are shown in Table 2.4.
Like the other organics results, if a compound was not detected, the emission rate and
concentration were calculated using the analytical detection limit. Resolution Analytics, Inc.
prefixed their detection limit values with a less than sign (<). In order to provide some
uniformity in the test program results, PES has flagged these analytical detection limits with a
"ND" prefix. Like the other organics results, all values based on detection limits were prefixed
with a "ND" and enclosed by brackets ({}). If a compound was not detected in one of the four
runs, a zero was used in the four-run average for that compound. If a compound was not
detected in all four runs, the four-run average was based on the average of the four values
calculated from the analytical detection limit, prefixed with a "ND", and presented in brackets.
The analytical result for crotonaldehyde for run MOO 11-3 was below-the analytical
quantitation limit but above the detection limit. These estimated values are flagged with a "J"
to indicate that compound was below the analytical quantitation limit. The "J" prefix was
2-16
-------
Acetaldebyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Acetone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Acrolein
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Benzaldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Butyraldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Crotonaldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Dimethylbenzaldehye
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Formaldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Hexaldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Propionaldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
o-, m-, p-Tolualdehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Table 2.4
Aldehydes and Ketones Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
M0011-1
M0011-2
M0011-3
M0011-4
Average*
B
B
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
63.6
0.162
35.4
0.118
{1.89}
{0.00611}
5.34
0.0327
3.68
0.0153
2.49
0.0101
{0.790}
{0.00612}
102
0.177
{1.04}
{0.00599}
4.75
0.0198
8.54
0.0286
{3.39}
{0.0235}
B
B
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
46.8
0.122
113
0.389
{1.79}
{0.00596}
5.56
0.0350
2.61
0.0111
{1.68}
{0.00699}
{0.749}
{0.00597}
88.0
0.157
{0.983}
{0.00584}
4.10
0.0175
6.34
0.0218
{3.21}
{0.0229}
B
B
B
B
ND
ND
J
J
ND
ND
B
B
ND
ND
ND
ND
73.6
0.187
108
0.363
{1.97}
{0.00638}
4.97
0.0304
5.34
0.0222
2.48
0.0100
{0.825}
{0.00638}
86.9
0.150
{1.08}
{0.00625}
5.54
0.0230
9.40
0.0315
{3.55}
{0.0246}
B 54.9
B 0.142
B 30.1
B 0.103
ND {1.78}
ND {0.00588}
4.09
0.0255
4.29
0.0182
2.25
0.00927
ND {0.746}
ND {0.00589}
B 72.2
B 0.128
2.28
0.0135
3.54
0.0150
6.88
0.0235
ND {3.20}
ND {0.0226}
59.7
0.153
71.7
0.243
ND {1.86}
ND {0.00608}
4.99
0.0309
3.98
0.0167
J 1.80
J 0.00734
ND {0.778}
ND {0.00609}
87.3
0.153
0.571
0.00336
4.48
0.0188
7.79
0.0264
ND {3.34}
ND {0.0234}
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-17
-------
iso -Valeraldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Valeraldehyde
Concentration, ppbvd
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Table 2.4
Aldehydes and Ketones Concentrations and Emission Rates
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
M0011-1
ND {1.14}
ND {0.00568}
ND {0.986}
ND {0.00490}
M0011-2
ND {1.08}
ND {0.00554}
ND {0.936}
ND {0.00478}
ND
ND
M0011-3
{1.19}
{0.00593}
5.62
0.0279
M0011-4
ND {1.08}
ND {0.00547}
2.64
0.0134
Average*
ND {1.12}
ND {0.00565}
2.06
0.0103
Total Aldehydes and Ketones
Emission Rate, Ib/hr
0.563
0.754
0.845
0.491
0.663
ND = Not Detected; values shown in brackets {} are based on the reported detection limit.
* Four-run average used non-detected values as zeroes.
2-18
-------
added to the four-sample average to indicate that the average was based on the estimated
value.
Like the other organics results, a "B" flag was used to indicate compounds detected in
the sample that were also detected in the laboratory blank (In-House DNPH Blank). The "B"
prefix was added to the four-run average if pertinent to any of the four sample runs.
Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were detected in the laboratory blank at levels of
4.75, 2.32 and 39.9 ug per blank respectively. The average sample catch weights for
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acetone were 196, 196 and 310 ug per sample respectively.
2.2.4 Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface GC/MS
Specific volatile organic hazardous air pollutants were determined using a direct
interface gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS). The results of this testing are
shown in Table 2.5.
Three test runs were performed concurrently with the first three MM5, VOST, and
aldehyde runs. The fourth run was aborted due to problems with the mobile laboratory.
Complete results are presented in the report "Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds
Emissions from the Doe Run Company - Primary Lead Smelter" reprinted in its entirety in
Appendix E.
2.2.5 No. 5 Baghouse Outlet Gas Conditions and CO Emissions
Table 2.6 summarizes the No. 5 baghouse outlet gas conditions from the MM5
sampling train and the CO concentrations from EPA Method 10 analysis of integrated bag
samples taken during the test program. The average stack gas velocity was 54.7 feet per
second (fps) at 178°F. The average volumetric flow rate was 469,534 actual cubic feet per
minute (acfm) or 378,592 dry standard cubic feet per minute (dscfm). The outlet gas was
comprised of 3.4 percent (%) moisture, 1.2% carbon dioxide (CO2), and 19.1% oxygen (O2).
The average CO concentration was 5,705 parts per million by volume on a dry basis (ppmvd).
This value, with the volumetric air flow rates from the concurrent MM5 testing, yielded an
average CO mass emission rate of 9,418 pounds per hour (Ib/hr).
2.3 BLAST FURNACE OUTLETS GAS CONDITIONS
Tables 2.7 and 2.8 summarize the Nos. 1 and 3 blast furnace outlets gas conditions and
volumetric flow rates. The results are based on EPA Methods 2, 3, and 4 tests performed at
the same time as the testing performed at the No. 5 baghouse outlet. Detailed test results
appear in Appendix C.
2-19
-------
TABLE 2.5
GASEOUS ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
BY DIRECT INTERFACE GC/MS
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
THE DOE RUN COMPANY IN HERCULANEUM, MO
Run No.
Date
Benzene
Concentration, ppbvd "
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
Carbon Disulfide
Concentration, ppbvd "
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Concentration, ppbvd "
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
Styrene
Concentration, ppbvd a
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
Toluene
Concentration, ppbvd •
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
m-/p-Xy\ene
Concentration, ppbvd a
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
o-Xylene
Concentration, ppbvd a
Emission Rate, Ib/hr b
Flow Rate used to calculate Ib/hr,
dscfm d
1
6/25/97
78
0.360
22
0.0989
NA<
NA<
NAC
NA°
22
0.120
12
0.0752
9
0.0564
379,180
2
6/25/97
89
0.418
31
0.142
NA<
NA<
2
0.0125
24
0.133
4
0.0255
NA°
NA<
386,175
3
6/26/97
107
0.483
41
0.180
6
0.0250
NA<
NA<
30
0.160
9
0.0552
NA°
NA°
371,032
Average
91.3
0.420
31.3
0.140
6
0.0250
2
0.0125
25.3
0.137
8.33
0.0520
9
0.0564
378,796
" ppbvd = parts per billion by volume, dry basis
b Ib/hr = pounds per hour
c NA = compound data was Not Available.
d Volumetric air flow rate from concurrent MM5 test run, in dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F and 1 atm
2-20
-------
TABLE 2.6
SUMMARY OF STACK GAS CONDITIONS AND CO CONCENTRATIONS
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
THE DOE RUN COMPANY - HERCULANEUM, MO
Run No.
Date
Total Sampling Time, min.
Average Sampling Rate, dscfin"
Sample Volume:
dscf"
dscmc
Average Stack Gas Temp.,°F
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
CO Concentration, ppmvd
CO Emission Rate, Ib/hr
Moisture, % by volume
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfind
dscfin'
dscmm'
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
MM5-1
6/25/97
120
0.958
114.973
3.256
175
19.4
1.2
5,370
8,878
3.4
467,725
379,180
10,737
99.6
MM5-2
6/25/97
120
0.940
112.814
3.195
184
18.4
1.3
5,887
9,913
4.7
489,390
386,175
10,935
96.8
MM5-3
6/26/97
120
0.918
110.181
3.120
177
19.4
1.3
5,658
9,153
2.9
457,317
371,032
10,506
97.6
MM5-4
6/26/97
120
0.919
110.314
3.124
175
19.1
1.1
5,903
9,729
2.8
463,704
377,982
10,703
96.7
Average
0.934
1 12.070
3.173
178
19.1
1.2
5,705
9,418
3.4
469,534
378,592
10,721
97.7
" Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68 °F and 1 atm
0 Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
e Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-21
-------
Table 2.7
Summary of Stack Gas Conditions
No. 1 Blast Furnace Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
Run Number 1-M2/4-1 1-M2/4-2 1-M2/4-3 1-M2/4-4 Average
Run Date 6/25/97 6/25/97 6/26/97 6/26/97
Method 4 Run Times 0955-1055 1659-1750 0942-1042 1413-1513
Average Stack Temperature, °F 187 354 363 228 283
Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 3.8 5.1 4.7 4.8 4.6
Oxygen content, % by volume 17.5 15.8 16.5 15.6 16.4
Nitrogen content, % by volume 78.7 79.1 78.8 79.6 79.1
Moisture, % by volume 4.7 6.0 3.7 3.1 4.4
Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 19.1 21.9 22.3 19.9 20.8
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfm 68,819 78,756 80,401 71,464 74,860
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 53,608 48,046 49,779 53,220 51,163
2-22
-------
Table 2.8
Summary of Stack Gas Conditions
No. 3 Blast Furnace Outlet
The Doe Run Company - Herculaneum, MO
Run Number 3-M2/4-1 3-M2/4-2 3-M2/4-3 3-M2/4-4 Average
Run Date 6/25/97 6/25/97 6/26/97 6/26/97
Method 4 Run Times 0955-1055 1543-1643 0936-1036 1413-1513
Average Stack Temperature, °F 219 345 385 323 318
Carbon Dioxide content, % by volume 1.8 2.4 3.2 1.1 2.1
Oxygen content, % by volume 19.1 18.2 18.1 19.8 18.8
Nitrogen content, % by volume 79.1 79.4 78.7 79.1 79.1
Moisture, % by volume 4.5 3.9 3.7 4.0 4.0
Stack Gas Velocity, ft/s 28.2 29.9 31.9 30.9 30.2
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, acfin 101,699 107,574 114,936 111,332 108,885
Stack Gas Volumetric flow, dscfm 75,379 67,755 69,234 72,044 71,103
2-23
-------
The No. 2 blast furnace was shutdown for maintenance during the test program. The
absence of any flow from the No. 2 blast furnace was verified by velocity traverses at the
outlet duct conducted prior to the first test set and just after completion of the fourth test set.
At the No. 1 blast furnace outlet, the average stack gas velocity was 20.6 fps at 283 °F.
The average volumetric flow rate was 74,339 acfm or 50,805 dscfm. The outlet gas was
comprised of 4.4% moisture, 4.6% CO2, and 16.4% oxygen (O2).
At the No. 3 blast furnace outlet, the average stack gas velocity was 30.0 feet per
second (fps) at 318°F. The average volumetric flow rate was 107,981 acfm or 70,519 dscfm.
The outlet gas was comprised of 4.0 % moisture, 2.1% CO2, and 18.8% O2.
Results for the fourth EPA Method 4 determination at the No. 3 blast furnace outlet
(run 3-M4-4) showed a moisture catch that was over twice the previous three runs.
Examination of the data showed an initial tare weight for the first impinger that was
approximately 100 milligrams less than similar impingers' tare weights. Since there was no
way to reconfirm the initial tare weight, the moisture content for the fourth run was estimated
based on the average of the previous three EPA Method 4 determinations.
2-24
-------
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF PROCESS OPERATION
This section describes the Doe Run primary lead smelter in Herculaneum, Missouri
and provides a summary of the operating conditions of the blast furnace during the time of the
emissions testing.
3.1 FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The Doe Run facility in Herculaneum, Missouri is one of only three primary lead
smelters in the country. Doe Run's primary lead smelter processes lead sulfide ore concentrate
received from local mines. Doe Run processes approximately 335,000 tons per year (TPY) of
ore to produce approximately 250,000 TPY of refined lead, making Doe Run the largest
primary lead smelter in the country. Normal daily blast furnace feed can go as igh as 2,000 to
2,600 tons of sinter. Figure 3.1 is a simplified flow diagram of the primary lead smelting
process. The main process areas include material storage and handling, sinter plant, smelting
process, dressing, lead refinery, and acid plant. Since the emission testing was limited to the
blast furnace, the remainder of this description will focus on the blast furnace operations.
Figure 3.2 is an illustaraion of a typical primary lead blast furnace. The Doe Run
facility operates three blast furnaces. Usually two of the furnaces will be in operation while
the third blast furnace is being refurbished. Charge materials are pre-weighed to ensure the
proper mixture and then introduced into the top of the furnace by a shuttle conveyor. Charge
material is added periodically, roughly once every 10 minutes, to keep the level of the charge
at a consistent working height. Sinter is produced by oxidizing the ore concentrate (primarily
lead sulfide, PbS) in the on-site sintering machine to create a lead oxide/lead sulfate
agglomerate.
Two sets of 20 tuyeres through which combustion air is admitted under pressure are
located near the bottom and evenly spaced on either side of the furnace. Oxygen enriched
combustion air (3 percent) is supplied to the furnace at a rate of approximately 45,000 cfrn @
3.9psi.
The chemical reactions taking place inside of the furnace reduce the lead compunds to
elemental lead. As the reaction takes place, molten lead and molten slag pool at the bottom of
the furnace. Each furnace operates with a continuous tapper, the outlet of which flows into a
gas fired settling chamber. Molten slag overflows the settling chamber into a granulating
system. Furnace bullion leaves the settler, via a lead well, into a 10 ton refractory-lined
transfer ladle on a wheeled motorized carriage.
The furnaces, are ventilated through a water cooled thimble which discharges centrally
to a circular steel gooseneck, 72' in diameter, which in turn connects to the main flue system.
3-1
-------
Is)
Material Storage
and Sinter Charge
Preparation
Coke, Iron,
and Other
Fluxes
Sinter Storage
Return Sinter (Fines)
Sinter Machine
Sinter Crushing
and Sizing
Sinter
Blast Furnace
Furnace Lead
Dressing Kettles
Lead
Refining Kettles
Dross
Dross Furnace
Lead
Casting
Figure 3.1 Simplified Process Flow Diagram for Primary Lead Smelting
-------
All three blast furnaces tie into a common plenum which runs the length of the building.
Several process fugitive hoods also tie into the plenum. However, these process fugitive
sources do not contribute organic emissions.
The combined exhausts are controlled by a shaker type baghouse. The combined
volume is about 550,000 acfm at 250 °F. The baghouse unit consists of 17 compartments with
a total of 384 bags; 14 cells operate while 2 cells are in the cleaning process and one in
maintenance. The net cloth area of the baghouse is roughly 250,000 square feet with an air to
cloth ratio of 2.22. The cloth material is polyester felt.
Following the baghouse, the blast furnace exhausts are combined with the exhaust
from several other process sources and exhausted through the main stack. A simplified
process air flow schematic for the blast furnaces, hygiene ventilation system, and No. 5
baghouse is shown in Figure 3.3.
3.2 FURNACE CHARGE RATE
Two furnaces, No. 1 and No. 3, were in operation during the emissions tests. Facility
personnel recorded the time and weight of each sinter and coke charge. A summary of the
charge data is provided in Table 3.1. The data sheets provided by the facility are attached as
Appendix F-l. Furnace No. 1 was charged on average approximately 30 tons of sinter per
hour, while furnace No. 3 was charged on average approximately 34 tons of sinter per hour.
The total sinter charge rate for the two furnaces of 64 tons per hour corresponds to a lead
production rate of roughly 1,100 tons per day or 410,000 TPY. The coke charge rate for
furnace No. 1 averaged 5,200 pounds per hour. The average coke charge rate furnace No. 3
during the emission test period was 6,800 pounds per hour.
3-4
-------
TABLE 3.1
SUMMARY OF FURNACE CHARGE DATA
BLAST FURNACE NOS. 1 AND 3
THE DOE RUN COMPANY - HERCULANEUM, MO
Furnace No. 1
6/25/1997
6/26/1997
Average
Furnace No. 3
6/25/1997
6/26/1997
Average
Total
Sinter Charge Rate
(tons/hr)
32
29
30
34
34
34
64
Coke Charge Rate
(pounds/hr)
5,300
5,100
5,200
6,000
7,600
6,800
13,000
3-5
-------
From Sulfur Plant
From No. 3 Baghouse
No. 5 Baghouse
u>
ON
©
o
Hygiene Ventilation
Hoods
No. 1
Blast
Furnace
No. 2
Blast
Furnace
No. 3
Blast
Furnace
© © © ©
Hygiene Ventilation
Hoods
Figure 3.3 Process Air Schematic for the Doe Run Company Primary Lead Smelter Process in Herculaneum, MO.
-------
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Source sampling was conducted at three locations on the Doe Run Company's primary
lead smelter process in Herculaneum, Missouri. The three locations, as shown previously in
Figure 1.2, were the outlets from the Nos. 1 and 3 blast furnaces, and the outlet duct of the
No. 5 baghouse. The absence of flow was verified at the beginning and end of the test
program in the exhaust duct from the No. 2 blast furnace, which was shutdown for
maintenance. Brief descriptions of the sampling locations are presented below, as well as
schematic diagrams.
4.1 BLAST FURNACE OUTLETS
There are three identical blast furnace outlets. The sampling ports in each outlet are
located in the vertical exhaust duct leading from the furnace to a plenum that connects to the
No. 5 baghouse. Figure 4.1 shows the duct geometry for each of the three identical blast
furnace outlets. The sample ports are located in a rectangular section 5 feet wide by 12 feet
deep. There are eight 4-inch ID sample ports installed, four each on opposing sides.
From the sample ports, the nearest downstream flow disturbance is a set of fixed
dampers that are located approximately 39 inches (0.46 equivalent diameters) below the
sample ports. The nearest upstream disturbance consists of a round-to-square transition,
which is located approximately 15 feet (2.125 equivalent diameters) upstream of the sample
ports. As per EPA Method 1, for flow rate measurements, PES used a 16-ppint traverse matrix
consisting of four traverse points on each of four parallel traverse lines. The results of the
EPA Method 1 calculations and the locations of the traverse points are presented in Figure 4.2.
Due to potential non-parallel flow, PES checked for and recorded yaw angle misalignment at
each sampling point as specified in Section 2.4 of Method 1. The average yaw angle was
determined to be 2.7 degrees for the No. 1 blast furnace outlet and 2.0 degrees for the No. 1
blast furnace outlet.
4-1
-------
Plenum to
No. 5 Baghouse
Figure 4.1 Blast Furnace Outlet Sampling Location,
The Doe Run Company in Herculaneum, MO
4-2
-------
E F G H
n n n n
*
c
T
^
s(
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
LJ U
A' B
S
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
U U
C D
5ft 1
ection A
Traverse Point
Number
1
2
Distance From
Inside Wall
18.0 inches
54.0 inches
Figure 4.2 Blast Furnace Outlet Traverse Point Locations,
The Doe Run Company in Herculaneum, MO
4-3
-------
4.2 NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
The No. 5 baghouse outlet is a horizontal round duct that leads from the No. 5
baghouse to the main stack. The sampling platform and sample ports are located
approximately 30 feet above grade. The inside diameter of the duct is 162 inches. There are
three 4-inch ID sample ports and one 2-inch ID sample port at this location. The 4-inch ports
are located on both sides and the top of the duct, the 2-inch ID sample port is located on the
top of the duct. The duct geometry, the position of the sample ports and the sampling platform
are shown in Figure 4.3. From the platform sample ports, the nearest upstream disturbance is
a 15° bend, which is located approximately 200 feet (14.8 duct diameters) upstream of the
ports. The nearest downstream disturbance consists of another 15° bend, which is located
approximately 150 feet (11.1 duct diameters) downstream of the ports. As per EPA Method 1,
for isokinetic sampling, PES used a 12-point traverse matrix consisting of six traverse points
on each of two perpendicular traverse lines. The results of the EPA Method 1 calculations and
the locations of the traverse points are shown in Figure 4.4. Due to potential non-parallel
flow, PES checked for and recorded yaw angle misalignment at each sampling point in Port A.
The average yaw angle was determined to be 3.0 degrees.
Prior to sampling the bottom of the duct was be checked for stagnant particulate. No
significant amounts of particulate were found.
4-4
-------
4-in Sample
Ports
!-in Sample
Port
approx. 200'
approx. 175'
Airflow from
"No. 5 baghouse
Figure 4.3 No. 5 Baghouse Outlet Sampling Location,
The Doe Run Company in Herculaneum, MO
4-5
-------
Section B
Traverse Point
Number
Distance From
Inside Wall
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.13 inches
23.7 inches
48.0 inches
114 inches
138 inches
155 inches
Figure 4.4 No. 5 Baghouse Outlet Traverse Point Locations,
The Doe Run Company in Herculaneum, MO
4-6
-------
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Source sampling was performed at the outlets of the two operating blast furnaces to
determine flue gas flow rates and at the No. 5 baghouse outlet to determine the concentrations
and emission rates of volatile HAPs, semi-volatile HAPs, carbon monoxide, aldehydes, and
ketones. The sampling and analytical methods used are summarized in Table 5.1. For each
sampling location, the parameters measured, the test method, the number of tests performed,
and the duration of each test are summarized in Table 5.2. Brief descriptions of the sampling
and analysis procedures used are presented in the paragraphs which follow.
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND SAMPLE/VELOCITY TRAVERSE
POINTS
EPA Method 1, "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources," was used to
establish velocity and sample traverse point locations at each test location. The process
ductwork, and the locations of measurement sites and traverse points were discussed in
Section 4.0 of this document.
5.2 DETERMINATION OF FLUE GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
EPA Method 2, "Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate
(Type S Pitot Tube)," was used to determine stack gas velocity. The flue gas volumetric flow
rate was calculated from the results of the velocity traverses, along with the flue gas
composition and moisture content data.
A Type S pitot tube, constructed according to Method 2 criteria and having an assigned
coefficient of 0.84, was connected to an inclined-vertical manometer. The pitot tube was
inserted into the stack and the velocity pressure (Ap), was recorded at each traverse point. The
effluent gas temperature was also recorded at each traverse point using a Type-K
thermocouple. The average stack gas velocity was calculated from the average square roots of
the velocity pressure, average stack gas temperature, stack gas molecular weight, and absolute
stack pressure. The volumetric flow rate was the product of velocity and the stack cross-
sectional area of the duct at the sampling location.
5-1
-------
TABLE 5.1
SUMMARY OF SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
THE DOE RUN COMPANY IN HERCULANEUM, MISSOURI
Test Method
Parameter or Target
Measurement Principle
EPA Method 1
EPA Method 2
EPA Method 3
EPA Method 4
EPA Method 10
Traverse Point Locations
Velocity and Flow
Molecular Weight
Moisture Content
Carbon Monoxide
Linear Measurement
Differential Pressure,
Thermocouple
Orsat
Gravimetric
NDIR/GFC
EPA Method SW-846 0030 Volatile Organic Hazardous GC/MS (SW-846 Method
Air Pollutants 8240A Rev. 1 (7/92))
EPA Method SW-846 0010 Semi-Volatile Organic
Hazardous Air Pollutants
BIF Method 0011
Direct Interface GC/MS
Aldehydes and Ketones
Volatile Organic Hazardous
Air Pollutants
GC/MS (SW-846 Method
8270A Rev. 1 (7/92))
HPLC (BIF Method 0011 A)
On-Site GC/MS
(On-site Direct Interface
GC/MS)
5-2
-------
TABLE 5.2
SUMMARY OF SAMPLING LOCATIONS, TEST PARAMETERS, TEST METHODS,
AND NUMBER AND DURATION OF TESTS
THE DOE RUN COMPANY IN HERCULANEUM, MISSOURI
Sampling
Location
No. 5 Baghouse
Outlet
No. 1 Blast
Furnace Outlet
No. 3 Blast
Furnace Outlet
Parameter
Flue Gas Flow Rate
Percent CO2, O2
Moisture Content
Carbon Monoxide
VOHAPs Concentration
SVOHAPs Concentration
Aldehydes and Ketone
Concentration
Specific VOHAP
Concentrations
Flow Rate
Percent CO2 , 02
Moisture
Flow Rate
Percent CO2 , 02
Moisture
EPA Test
Methods
EPA Method 2
EPA Method 3
EPA Method 4
EPA Method 10
SW-846 0030
SW-846 0010
BIF0011
Direct GC/MS*
EPA Method 2
EPA Method 3
EPA Method 4
EPA Method 2
EPA Method 3
EPA Method 4
Number
of Tests
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
6
4
4
6
4
4
Test
Duration,
(minutes)
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
15
60
60
15
60
60
* This is not an EPA test method.
5-3
-------
5.3 DETERMINATION OF FLUE GAS DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT
At the Nos. 1 and 3 blast furnace outlets, EPA Method 3, "Gas Analysis for the
Determination of Dry Molecular Weight," was used to determine carbon dioxide and oxygen
content of the flue gases. Gas samples were extracted from the same point and simultaneous
with the EPA Method 4 sampling train using the single-point, integrated bag sampling
technique.
At the No. 5 baghouse outlet, EPA Method 3, "Gas Analysis for the Determination of
Dry Molecular Weight," was used to determine carbon dioxide and oxygen content of the flue
gases. Gas samples were extracted from the same point and simultaneous with the VOST
sampling train using the single point, integrated sampling technique.
5.4 DETERMINATION OF FLUE GAS MOISTURE CONTENT
At the blast furnace outlets, the approximation method of EPA Method 4,
"Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases," was used to determine the flue gas
moisture content. The sampling procedures were identical to those of EPA Method 4 except
the sample was extracted from a single point in the exhaust ducts.
At the No. 5 baghouse outlet, EPA Method 4, "Determination of Moisture Content in
Stack Gases," was used to determine the flue gas moisture content. EPA Method 4 was
performed in conjunction with both the SW-846 0010 method for semi-volatile HAPs and the
BIF 0011 method for aldehydes and ketones. Integrated, multi-point, isokinetic sampling was
performed. Condensed moisture was determined by recording pre-test and post-test weights of
the impingers, reagents, and silica gel. The XAD sorbent trap from the SW-846 0010 sample
trains was also weighed.
5.5 DETERMINATION OF CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATION
At the No. 5 baghouse outlet, EPA Method 10, "Determination of Carbon Monoxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources," was used to determine carbon monoxide (CO)
concentrations. The integrated gas sample bags collected for Orsat analysis were analyzed on-
site using a Thermo Environmental Instruments, Inc. Model 48C CO analyzer. This
instrument utilizes a gas filter correlation system and non-dispersive infrared detector that
responds specifically to CO. The analyzer was operated on the 10,000 ppmv range.
Calibration gases consisted of prepurified grade nitrogen (N2) for zero, and CO inN2 span
gases corresponding to 30 and 60 percent (%) span. Calibration gases were certified by the
manufacturer to be within ±2% of the specified concentration.
5-4
-------
5.6 DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
(VOHAPS)
EPA Method SW-846 0030 "Volatile Organic Sampling Train" (VOST) was used to
collect volatile organic hazardous air pollutants (VOHAPs) at the No. 5 baghouse outlet. A
single point, integrated sample was collected at a constant rate of approximately 0.5 liters per
minute from a point four feet in from the duct wall. The VOST sample was extracted through
a heated glass-lined probe, a water-cooled condenser, a sorbent trap containing Tenax® sorbent
resin, a condensate knock-out trap, a second water-cooled condenser and a second sorbent trap
containing a combination of Tenax® and charcoal. A schematic of the VOST sampling train is
shown in Figure 5.1. Each VOST test run consisted of four 12-minute samples collected over
a 120 minute period.
The VOST samples were analyzed for the presence of volatile analytes in accordance
with the guidelines of Method 8240A Rev. 1 (7/92) by High-Resolution Gas Chromatography
/Low-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. All four of the 12-minute samples were analyzed for
each run. For each set that was analyzed, the front Tenax tube and back Tenax/charcoal tube
were thermally desorbed and analyzed together as one sample.
5.7 DETERMINATION OF SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS (SVOHAPS)
Method SW-846 0010 "Modified Method 5 Sampling Train (MM5)," was used to
collect semi volatile organic hazardous air pollutants (S VOHAPs) at the No. 5 baghouse outlet.
A multi-point, integrated sample was extracted isokinetically from the twelve traverse points
shown in Figure 4.4. At each traverse point, sampling was performed for 10 minutes for a
total run time of 120 minutes per test. Readings were taken every 5 minutes. The MM5
samples were extracted through a glass nozzle and in^stack filter, a heated Teflon® lined probe,
an unheated Teflon® sample line, a water cooled condenser coil and a sorbent trap containing
approximately 40 g of XAD-2 sorbent resin. A schematic of the MM5 sampling train is
shown in Figure 5.2.
The in-stack filter, Teflon® probe liner and flexible Teflon® sample line are
modifications of the MM5 sampling train. These modifications take the place of the
traditional glass lined probe, heated out-of-stack filter, and short glass tube that normally
connects the front half of the train to the water cooled condenser coil. These modifications
were necessary to accommodate the vertical sampling at the top of the baghouse outlet duct.
The interior surfaces of the stainless steel in-stack filter holder were coated with Teflon®. The
filters used were 47 mm in diameter, composed of quartz fiber, and contained no organic
binder. During sampling the flexible Teflon® sample line was positioned to ensure that any
condensate drained into the condenser instead of back into the probe.
5-5
-------
Glass
Wool
Filter
Three Way
Glass/Teflon
Valve
Stack
Heated Glass
Lined Probe
Condenser
1 Ice Water
Bath
Exhaust
Figure 5.1 Sampling Train Schematic for Method 0030
"Volatile Organic Sampling Train" (VOST)
5-6
-------
Button Hook
Glass Nozzle
Stack
Wall
Heated Teflon*
Liner
Gas
Flow
RecirculationlTT
Pump |LJ
Temperature
—.Sensors^..
Vacuum
Line
Empty
100 ml
HPLC Water
Empty Silica Gel
Gas
Exit
Orifice
1 1
J^S.
CT /
Dry Gas \
U-.*«. 1
-1
\#
/
Inclined
Manometer
V
Vacuum
Pump
Figure 5.2 Sampling Train Schematic for Method 0010
"Modified Method 5 Sampling Train" (MM5)
5-7
-------
The MM5 samples were extracted following the procedure of Method 3542, dated
January 1995. The MM5 samples were analyzed in accordance with the guidelines of Method
8270 by High Resolution Gas Chromatography/Low Resolution Mass Spectrometry. The
three sample fractions for each test run, i.e., front half extract, the back half extract (XAD-2
and back half rinse), and the condensate extract were combined for one analysis per test run.
5.8 DETERMINATION OF ALDEHYDES AND KETONES
BIF Method 0011 "Sampling for Aldehyde and Ketone Emissions from Stationary
Sources," as found in 40 CFR 266 Appendix IX, was used to collect aldehydes and ketones. A
multi-point, integrated sample was extracted isokinetically from the twelve traverse points
shown in Figure 4.4. At each traverse point, sampling was performed for 10 minutes for a
total run time of 120 minutes per test. Readings were recorded every 5 minutes. The samples
were extracted through a glass nozzle, a heated Teflon® lined probe, an unheated Teflon®
sample line, and two impingers containing 100 milliliters each of a solution of aqueous acidic
2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNPH). A schematic of the aldehyde sampling train is shown in
Figure 5.3.
The Teflon® probe liner and unheated Teflon® sample line were modifications of the
BIF Method 0011 sampling train. These modifications took the place of the traditional glass
lined probe and short glass tube that normally connects the front half of the train to the
impingers. These modifications were necessary to accommodate the vertical sampling for the
top of the baghouse outlet duct.
The Method 0011 samples were analyzed in accordance with BIF Method 0011A by
High Performance Liquid Chromatography.
5.9 DETERMINATION OF GASEOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY DIRECT
INTERFACE GC/MS
The procedure described in the document "Determination of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Direct Interface GC/MS" was used for the on-site measurement of gaseous
organic compounds. A copy of the document is included with the full report "Determination
of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from the Doe Run Company - Primary Lead
Smelter" which can be found in Appendix E. Included in the document is a schematic figure
of the sampling system.
5-8
-------
Twnp«i«lim
SMMOT
TlMrmonwW
Figure 5.3 Sampling Train Schematic for Method 0011 "Sampling for
Aldehyde and Ketone Emissions from Stationary Sources
5-9
-------
6.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
The purpose of the test program was to determine whether organic HAPs are
emitted from the primary lead source category at levels that would justify regulation
under the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) program. The action
levels for pursuing regulation under the MACT program are emissions of 10 tons per year
(TPY) for an individual organic HAP, or 25 TPY for cumulative organic HAPs. The
objective of the test program was to measure organic HAP emissions for comparison with
the action levels. The program data quality objectives set the acceptable level of
uncertainty of the measurements relative to the action levels at plus or minus 20%.
The highest individual volatile HAP emission rate measured was for benzene at
0.288 pounds per hour (PPH). The highest individual semi-volatile HAP emission rate
measured was for phenol at 0.0413 PPH. The highest individual aldehyde or ketone
emission rate was for acetone, at 0.243 PPH. This data is presented in Table 6.1 along
with the results of a statistical analysis performed on the data. The sixteen VOST
samples taken for benzene and the four MM5 samples taken for phenol are presented in
columns one through four. In the fifth column the mean or simple average of the
individual measurements is presented. In the sixth column the sample standard deviation
is presented. The coefficient of variation (CV), presented in the seventh column, is the
ratio of the standard deviation to the mean, expressed as a percentage. When this number
is small (say less than 10%), the sample measurements are found in a tight cluster. When
the CV is large (say greater than 200%), the samples are widely distributed without a
strong central trend. As can be seen, the CV for the data set presented ranges from 9.3%
for total semi-volatile HAPs to 63.2% for acetone.
Also presented are the 80% lower and upper confidence levels. These values are
PPH and TPY emission rates on both sides of the mean and represent the 80% confidence
levels within which the "true" value will fall. In other words there is only a 20% chance
or level of uncertainty that the "true" value will fall outside these values. As can be seen
the 80% upper confidence level values presented in the last column are well below the
action levels defined by the data quality objectives. Benzene, the highest individual HAP
emitted, has an 80% upper confidence level of 1.47 TPY. The 80% upper confidence
level for total HAPs, aldehydes, and ketones is 12.55 TPY. These TPY values were
calculated using 8,760 hours per year. Actual total HAPs and operating hours may be less
due to an annual maintenace shutdown of the furnaces.
6-1
-------
Table 6.1
Statistical Analysis of Selected Organic Emission Rates
NO. 5 Baghouse Outlet
The Doe Run Company, Herculaneum, MO
Volatile HAPs
Benzene, Test 1 - Samples 1, 2, 3, & 4
Benzene, Test 2 - Samples 1, 2, 3, & 4
Benzene, Test 3 - Samples 1, 2, 3, & 4
Benzene, Test 4 - Samples 1, 2, 3, & 4
Benzene - Average of Tests 1, 2, 3 & 4
Total Volatile HAPs
Semi-Volatile HAPs
Phenol
Total Semi- Volatile HAPs
Total HAPs
Aldehydes and Ketones
Acetone
Total Aldehydes & Ketones HAPs
Total HAPs, Aldehydes, and Ketones
Pounds Per Hour
Setl Set 2 Set 3 Set 4
0.242 0.237 0.232 0.297
0.500 0.319 0.306 0.359
0.174 0.134 0.235 0.441
0.235 0.311 0.324 0.262
0.252 0.371 0.246 0.283
1.50 1.25 2.21 1.34
0.0491 0.0466 0.0361 0.0335
0.191 0.154 0.175 0.164
1.691 1.404 2.385 1.504
0.118 0.389 0.363 0.103
0.563 0.754 0.845 0.491
2.254 2.158 3.230 1.995
Mean
0.252
0.371
0.246
0.283
0.288
1.575
0.0413
0.171
1.746
0.243
0.663
2.409
80% Lower 80% Upper
Standard Coefficient Confidence Confidence
Deviation of Variation Level (PPH) Level (PPH)
0.030 12.0% 0.227 0.277
0.089 24.0% 0.298 0.444
0.136 55.5% 0.134 0.358
0.042 14.7% 0.249 0.317
0.058 20.0% 0.241 0.335
0.436 27.7% 1.218 1.932
0.008 18.6% 0.035 0.048
0.016 9.3% 0.158 0.184
0.442 25.3% 1.384 2.108
0.154 63.2% 0.117 0.369
0.164 24.8% 0.529 0.798
0.558 23.1% 1.953 2.866
80% Upper
Confidence
Level (TPY)
1.21
1.94
1.57
1.39
1.47
8.46
0.21
0.81
9.23
1.62
3.49
12.55
p:\s407.002\pretest\stat.2xls
-------
7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)
This section describes the specific QA/QC procedures that were employed by PES
in performing this series of tests. The procedures in the EPA Reference Test Methods
served as the basis for all the testing and the related QA/QC activities in this project.
7.1 CALIBRATION AND PREPARATION OF APPARATUS
The preparation and calibration of source sampling equipment is essential in
maintaining data quality. Brief descriptions of the calibration procedures used by PES
follow.
7.1.1 Temperature Sensors
Electronic temperature readouts used on the MM5 and M0011 sampling trains
were calibrated on-site using a thermocouple simulator having a range of 0-2400°F.
Calibration were performed at 0,200 and 500 °F as shown in Table 7.1.
7.1.2 Pitot Tubes
PES uses Type S pitot tubes that met the geometric specifications of EPA
Method 2. As allowed in Method 2, PES used a baseline coefficient of 0.84. The
dimensional criteria and results of the pitot tubes used on the MM5 and M0011 sampling
trains are summarized in Table 7.2.
7.1.3 Differential Pressure Gauges
PES used Dwyer inclined and inclined/vertical manometers to measure
differential pressures. The differential pressure measurements included velocity pressure,
static pressure, and meter orifice pressure. Manometers were selected with sufficient
sensitivity to accurately measure pressures over the entire range of expected values.
Manometers are primary standards and require no calibration.
7.1.4 MM5 and Method 0011 Drv Gas Meters and Orifices
The MM5 and BIF Method 0011 dry gas meters and orifices were calibrated in
accordance with Section 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 of EPA Method 5. This procedure involves
direct comparison of the dry gas meters to a reference dry test meter. The reference dry
test meter is routinely calibrated using a wet test meter or liquid displacement technique.
Before its initial use in the field, each metering system was calibrated over the entire
range of operation as specified in EPA Method 5. After field use, each metering system
7-1
-------
TABLE 7.1
SUMMARY ELECTRONIC TEMPERATURE READOUT DATA
Meterbox
Identification
MM5
MMOO11
Millivolt
Reading
-0.0692
3.819
10.56
-0.0692
3.819
10.56
Reference
Temp
Reading, F
0
200
500
0
200
500
Meterbox
Reading, F
3.0
203.8
501.2
1.0
201.8
497.2
Reference
Temp
Reading, R
460
660
960
460
660
960
Meterbox
Reading, R
463.0
663.8
961.2
461.0
661.8
957.2
Percent
Difference
0.65
0.58
0.13
0.22
0.27
-0.29
7-2
-------
TABLE 7.2
SUMMARY OF PITOT TUBE DIMENSIONAL DATA
Measurement
«1
«2
PI
P2
Y
0
A
Z
w
D,
A/2D,
Criteria
<10°
<10°
<5°
<5°
-
-
-
^0.1 25 in.
s 0.03 125 in.
0.1875" sAs;
1.50D,
Acceptable
Assigned Coefficient
RESULTS
Pitot Tube Identification
MM5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.954
0.017
0.0
0.375
1.27
Yes
0.84
MOO 11
3.5
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.895
0.016
0.008
0.375
1.19
Yes
0.84
7-3
-------
was calibrated at a single intermediate setting based on the operation of the meter box
during the field test. The results of these calibrations are summarized in Table 7.3.
7.1.5 VOST Drv Gas Meter
The VOST dry gas meter was calibrated over the expected range of operation by
direct comparisons to a low-flow electronic calibrator. This method measures the elapsed
time for a liquid film bubble traversing between two points in a precision bore tube. The
calibrator comes certified from the manufacturer against a NIST traceable curve.
Calibration of the VOST dry gas meter was accomplished by operating the VOST meter
over a five-minute period and calculating the meter flow rate for that period corrected to
standard conditions of 29.92 inches of mercury and 68 °F. During that period, 10 dry gas
meter flow rate determinations were made using the electronic calibrator. The ratio of the
electronic calibrator flow rate to the VOST dry gas meter flow rate is the meter
coefficient. This procedure was conducted in triplicate. The VOST meter was operated
at a nominal flow rate of 0.5 liters/mm (1/min). The VOST dry gas meter was calibrated
at 3 flow rate settings of 0.25 1/min, 0.5 1/min and 0.75 1/min. This calibration data is
summarized in Table 7.3
7.2 REAGENTS AND GLASSWARE PREPARATION
7.2.1 Modified Method 5
All sample train glassware and sample recovery apparatus were preconditioned
following the procedures of Method 0010. All sampling train compounds and sample
recovery apparatus were soaked in hot soapy water (Alconox®), followed by three rinses
each with tap water, distilled/deionized water, pesticide grade methanol, and methylene
chloride. All glassware was then be capped with aluminum foil. Quartz-fiber filters,
without organic binders, were used.
The XAD-2 sorbent resin traps were prepared by Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
Once cleaned, the traps were pre-spiked with surrogates, and capped with glass balls and
sockets until use in the field. Impinger water was organic-free, reagent grade. Distilled-
in-glass grade methylene chloride and methyl alcohol were used as recovery solvents.
7.2.2 BIF Method 0011
All sample train glassware and sample recovery apparatus were soaked in hot,
soapy water (Alconox®) followed by successive rinses using organic-free, reagent grade
water, distilled-in-glass methylene chloride, and a final rinse with organic-free, reagent
grade water. Sample containers were commercially available, pre-cleaned, and quality
assured bottles. The DNPH solution was prepared using reagent grade chemicals.
7-4
-------
TABLE 7.3
SUMMARY OF DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE CALIBRATION DATA
Meter
No.
MM5
MOO11
VOST
Gamma
Pre-test
0.977
1.010
*
Post-test
0.976
1.020
*
% Diff.
0.10
0.98
*
EPA Criteria
±5%
±5%
*
Orifice Coefficient
Average
*
1.585
NA
Range
*
1.60-
1.575
NA
EPA
*
1.585
NA
Criteria
±0.20
±0.20
NA
* Data not available at this time. This data will be included in the final report.
NA - Not Applicable.
7-5
-------
7.2.3 VOST
All sampling train glassware and metal parts were cleaned with a non-ionic
detergent, rinsed with organic-free water, and dried as specified in VOST Method 0030.
The Tenax® and Tenax® charcoal resins were Soxhlet extracted with methanol and dried.
The Tenax® and Tenax® charcoal sorbent tubes were assembled and conditioned by
heating to 190° C while organic-free nitrogen was passed through them. Each pair of
tubes was blank checked by thermal desorption and gas chromatographic techniques prior
to sampling to ensure cleanliness.
7.3 ON-SITE SAMPLING
7.3.1 General
Barometric pressure was recorded at the beginning and end of each sampling
period. The average of the two recordings was used in the calculations. No adjustments
were made for elevation since the location was less than 50 feet above ground level.
Prior to sampling, the MM5, Method 0011, and VOST meter systems were leak-
checked both before and after the vacuum pump. The meter orifice check of section 4.4.1
of Method 5 was performed on the MM5 and Method 0011 metering systems.
The MM5 and Method 0011 sampling trains were assembled in the plant
laboratory away from the sampling site. The sampling train was sealed with Teflon® tape
for transport to and from the sampling site. Sample recovery after each test run was
performed in the plant laboratory which is discussed in Section 7.4 of this document.
7.3.2 Measurement Sites
Prior to sampling, all duct dimensions were checked against preliminary
information to verify measurement site locations, location of test ports, and duct inside
dimensions. Inside dimensions were checked to determine uniformity of the duct cross-
sectional area and the sample test ports were checked to verify that they did not extend
beyond the inside wall. The duct inside dimensions, wall thickness, and sample port
depths were measured to the nearest 1/16 inch. Since the outlet duct from the No. 5
baghouse is horizontal, the duct was inspected for the presence of sediment. No sediment
was found.
7.3.3 Velocity Measurements
All velocity measurement apparatus were assembled, leveled, zeroed, and leak-
checked prior to use and at the end of each test run. The static pressure was determined at
a single point near the center of the stack cross-section. At each of the test locations a
cyclonic flow check was performed to evaluate the suitability of the sampling location for
7-6
-------
velocity traverse as discussed in Section 4.1. At all locations the average yaw angle was
found to be well below 20° as discussed in Section 4.0.
7.3.4 Flue Gas Composition
Integrated single-point flue gas samples were collected in Tedlar® gas bags and
analyzed for carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) content. Prior to sampling, the gas
bags were leak-checked. At the sampling site, the sampling apparatus was assembled and
leak-checked. Prior to sampling, the gas bag was completely evacuated. The sampling
train was started and once the entire sample train was purged, the sample flow rate was
set and the gas bag was attached. At the completion of the sampling period the gas bag
was removed and the inlet sealed.
7.3.5 Moisture
At the blast furnace outlets the stack gas moisture content was determined
gravimetrically following the procedures of Method 4. At the No. 5 baghouse outlet the
MM5 and Method 0011 trains were used to determine stack gas moisture. During
sampling, the exit gas of the last impinger was maintained below 68 °F to ensure
complete condensation of the stack gas water vapor. The total moisture was determined
on-site gravimetrically using an electronic platform balance with 0.1 gram sensitivity.
7.3.6 Modified Method 5 and Method 0011
The MM5 and M0011 sampling trains were set up without the probe and leak
checked in the sample recovery area before transport to the sampling site. At the
sampling site the probes was attached and the trains were leaked before the test runs and
at the completion of the test runs. The results of these leak checks are summarized in
Table 7.4. Also shown in Table 7.4 are the percent isokinetic sampling rates for each test
run.
One Modified Method 5 and one Method 0011 field blank was obtained and
checked for field contamination. Complete sample trains were assembled in the sample
recovery area and transported to and from the sampling location in the same manner as
the sample trains used for the test runs. Each field blank train as subjected to a minimum
of one leak check in the laboratory and three at the sampling site. Results of the field
blanks are discussed in Section 7.6.
7.3.7 VOST
The VOST sampling train was assembled at the sampling site. One days worth of
VOST sorbent tubes were stored at the sampling site in a sample cooler at a temperature
below 10° C. The sorbent tubes were removed from the cooler just prior to sampling and
placed back in the cooler at the end of the sampling period. The sampling train was leak
checked before each run and the results recorded. Two VOST field blanks were collected
7-7
-------
TABLE 7.4
SUMMARY OF MM5 AND M0011 FIELD SAMPLING QA/QC DATA
Run No.
MM5-1
MM5-2
MM5-3
MM5-4
M0011-1
MOO 11 -2
MOO 11 -3
MOO 11 -4
Pre-Test
Leak Rate
acfm
0.009 @ 14" Hg
0.005 @1 6" Hg
0.003 @ 22" Hg
Not available
0.001 @ 14.5 Hg
0.002 @ 9.5 Hg
0.003 @ 10.5 Hg
0.001 @ 10.5 Hg
Post-Test
Leak Rate
acfm
0.006 @ 16" Hg
0.005 @1 6" Hg
0.006 @1 8" Hg
0.002 @ 20" Hg
0.000 @ 4.5 Hg
0.001 @ 6.5 Hg
0.000 @ 5.0 Hg
0.001 @ 10.0 Hg
EPA
Criteria
acfm
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Percent
Isokinetic
99.4
96.1
97.5
96.5
101.9
101.8
96.4
100.9
EPA
Criteria
%
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
90-110
7-8
-------
as a check for field contamination. For each field blank, the end caps on one Tenax®
sorbent tube and one Tenax® charcoal sorbent tube were removed exposing the tubes to
the ambient conditions at the sampling site. After five minutes the tubes were sealed and
placed back in the cooler. Results of the field blanks are discussed in Section 7.6.
7.4 SAMPLE RECOVERY
Sample recovery was performed in the plant's laboratory under the supervision of
the PES On-Site Laboratory Supervisor. The plant laboratory was off-site from the
smelter and was clean of background contaminants.
7.4.1 Modified Method 5
Recovery of the Modified Method 5 sample train was performed following the
procedures of Method 0010. In addition to the field blank discussed in Section 7.3.6,
blanks were taken of reagent grade water, methanol, methylene chloride, unused filters,
and XAD-2 resin cartridge. The sample recovery apparatus was made of glass[]and
precleaned as described in Section 7.2.1. The sample train cleanup was accomplished by
rinsing each sample train component three times with a 50/50 mixture of methanol and
methylene chloride.
7.4.2 Method 0011
Recovery of the aldehydes and ketones sample train was performed following the
procedures of Method 0011. In addition to the field blank discussed in Section 7.3.6, a
sample blank of the DNPH and methylene chloride was taken. The sample recovery
apparatus was made of glass and precleaned as described in Section 7.2.2. The sample
train cleanup was accomplished by first rinsing the entire sample train with methylene
chloride followed by a reagent grade water rinse of the impingers.
7.4.3 VOST
The VOST sample recovery was accomplished at the sampling site. The
recovered samples were transported to the plant laboratory where the VOST cartridges
were stored for transport to the analytical laboratory.
7.5 ON-SITE ANALYSES
7.5.1 Flue Gas Composition
Integrated flue gas samples, collected in Tedlar bags, were analyzed within four
hours after sample collection as per Method 3. C02 and 02 content was determined using
an Orsat analyzer with 0.1% graduations. Prior to analysis, the Orsat analyzer was
7-9
-------
replenished with fresh reagents and leak-checked in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions. The orsat was found to be free of leaks.
7.5.2 Carbon Monoxide
The field QA/QC activities for Method 10 included the use of certified calibration
gases, pretest calibration error tests and post-test zero and calibration drift determinations.
The span gas closest to the measured concentration was used for the calibration drift
check. Results of the calibration error and drift checks are presented with the carbon
monoxide data in Appendix A. 1.4.
7.5.3 Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface GC/MS
The procedure described in the document "Determination of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Direct Interface GC/MS" was used for the on-site measurement of
specific gaseous organic compounds. Refer to Appendix E for complete details for all
QA/QC procedures and results.
7.6 LABORATORY ANALYSIS
7.6.1 Modified Method 5 (MMS)
The MM5 samples were analyzed following the procedures of SW-846 Method
8270A Rev. 1 (7/92). Field blanks and laboratory blanks were used to check for
contamination. The blanks were processed in the same way the field samples were
processed. The results of the field and laboratory blanks are presented in Table 7.5. Also
shown are the average catch weights for the compounds presented. As can be seen, two
compounds, Di-n-butylphthalate and bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate, were found in the
blanks in significant quantities relative to the catch weights. The significance of the
blank values is discussed in section 2.2.2.
A five point initial calibration was performed using internal standards and
instrument response factors developed for the target analytes. Method 8720A procedures
require the percent standard deviations of the initial calibrations to be within 50% for
most analytes and 30% for some analytes. All internal standards were within the Method
8270A quality control criteria.
All XAD-2 resins were spiked with surrogate standards prior to the field
sampling. The percent recoveries for the surrogate standards are presented in Table 7.6.
7-10
-------
TABLE 7.5
MM5 FIELD AND LABORATORY BLANKS RESULTS
Compound
Acetophenone
Di-n-butylphthalate
Dibenzofuran
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Fluoranthene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Amount, in micrograms*
Average Catch
Weight**
34.86
10.73
11.73
0.89
5.32
3.76
25.09
76.04
32.18
93.63
1.69
Field
Blank
{8.76}
{9.73}
{0.08}
{0.22}
11.81
{0.31}
{0.12}
{2.40}
{1.29}
{0.83}
{0.33}
Laboratory
Blank
{5.81}
{2.35}
ND
ND
{1.35}
ND
ND
{1.97}
ND
{0.54}
ND
* Values in brackets { } are estimated values that were above the detection limit, but
below the quantitation limit.
ND = Compound was not detected,
** Average Catch Weight = Average sample amount from runs MM5-1, MM5-2,
MM5-3, and MM5-4.
7-11
-------
TABLE 7.6
MM5 SURROGATE RECOVERY RESULTS
Surrogate
Anthracene-d10
Pyrene-d10
Terphenyl-d]4
Phenol-d5
Nitrobenzene-ds
1 ,3 ,5-Trichlorobenzene-d3
1 ,4-Dibromobenzene-d4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Percent Recovery
MM5-1
83
107
119
71
64
54
72
75
94
MM5-2
62
79
94
61
59
52
63
60
72
MM5-3
85
116
136
79
67
55
79
71
104
MM5-4
76
104
120
66
53
44
60
67
95
Field
Blank
87
99
115
72
65
65
67
77
94
SBLK
070897
82
84
99
62
51
44
58
57
83
Method
QC
Limits
20-120
20-120
20-120
20-1.20
20-120
20-120
20-120
20-120
20-120
7-12
-------
7.6.2 VOST
The VOST samples were analyzed following the procedures of SW-846 Method
8240A Rev. 1 (7/92). Field and laboratory blanks were used to check for contamination.
They were processed in the same way the field samples were processed. Table 7.7
summarizes the results for the VOST field and laboratory blanks. Also shown are the
average catch weights for the compounds presented. As can be seen, two compounds,
n-hexane and methylene chloride, were found in field blank 2 at levels higher than the
average catch weights. The significance of the blank values are discussed in
Section 2.2.1.
A five point initial calibration was performed using internal standards and instrument
response factors developed for the target analytes. Method 8240A procedures required
the percent standard deviation of the initial calibrations (%RSD) to be within 50% for
most analytes and 30% for some analytes. All internal standards were within the 8240A
quality control limits.
The Tenax® and Tenax® charcoal resins were spiked with surrogate standards after
the field sampling and prior to sample analysis. The percent recoveries for the VOST
surrogates are summarized in Table 7.8.
7-13
-------
TABLE 7.7
VOST FIELD AND LABORATORY BLANKS RESULTS
Compound
Acetone
Benzene
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Cumene
Ethylbenzene
n-Hexane
Isooctane
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Toluene
Trichlorofluoromethane
m/^-Xylene
o-Xylene
Amount, in micrograms*
Average
Catch
Weight b
0.080
1.078
0.020
0.0035
0.0030
0.185
0.005
0.066
0.467
0.0154
0.966
0.338
0.428
0.199
0.145
0.057
Field Blanks
VOST
FB2
{0.045}
{0.042}
{0.004}
{0.003}
{0.001}
{0.005}
{0.001}
{0.002}
0.950
{0.042}
[1.547]
{0.003}
0.051
{0.014}
{0.004}
{0.002}
VOST
FB3
{0.037}
0.050
ND
ND
ND
{0.002}
ND
ND
{0.013}
ND
{0.044}
ND
{0.011}
ND
ND
ND
Laboratory Blanks
VOSTBLK
070897
{0.028}
{0.026}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.007}
ND
{0.008}
ND
ND
ND
VOSTBLK
070997
{0.022}
{0.037}
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
{0.014}
ND
{0.009}
ND
ND
ND
a Values in brackets { } are estimates that are below quantitation limit.
Values in braces [ ] are estimates that are above the calibration range.
ND = Compound was not detected.
All other VOST compounds were not detected and are not listed here.
b Average Catch Weight = Average of 16 VOST samples.
7-14
-------
TABLE 7.8
VOST SURROGATE RECOVERY RESULTS
Sample ID
VOST-1 SET 1
VOST- 1 SET 2
VOST-1 SET 3
VOST-1 SET 4
VOST-2 SET 1
VOST-2 SET 2
VOST-2 SET 3
VOST-2 SET 4
VOST-3 SET 1
VOST-3 SET 2
VOST-3 SET 3
VOST-3 SET 4
VOST-4 SET 1
VOST-4 SET 2
VOST-4 SET 3
VOST-4 SET 4
VOST FB 2
VOST FB 3
VOSTBLK 070897
VOSTBLK 070997
Percent Recovery
1,2-Dichloro
ethane-d4
111
104
107
115
113
92
93
94
98
96
92
87
87
95
107
99
116
116
121
108
Benzene-dg
114
112
116
124
123
100
106
104
111
107
104
102
100
110
108
108
114
115
116
107
Toluene-dg
112
114
116
118
118
112
117
116
118
111
112
112
115
113
112
116
115
114
114
110
Method QC
Limits
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
7-15
-------
7.6.3 Method 0011
The analytical procedures of Method 0011 were used for the determination of
aldehydes and ketones. Sample preparation involved the extraction of the liquid sample
with methylene chloride followed by solvent exchange to methanol. The analysis of the
sample extract was conducted by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using
a CIS column, a methanol/water mobile phase, and an ultraviolet detector. The field
blank sample and the reagent blank samples, mentioned in Section 7.3.6, were processed
in the same manner as the field samples were processed. Refer to Table 7.9 for the results
for the Method 0011 field and laboratory blanks. The significance of these blank value
are discussed in Section 2.2.3.
As a check on sample recovery and analysis, a field spike containing 1.60
milligrams of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde was added to fresh DNPH reagent. The
spiked sample was recovered and analyzed following the same procedures as the field
samples. These results are summarized in Table 7.10.
7-16
-------
TABLE 7.9
METHOD 0011 FIELD AND LABORATORY BLANKS RESULTS
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acrolein
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Butylaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
Isovaleraldehyde
Valeraldehyde
Tolualdehyde
Hexanal
2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde
Amount, in micrograms
Average
Catch
Weight
196
196
310
<7.77
33.6
-9.33
24.0
21.3
39.6
<7.23
12.9
<29.9
4.33
<7.78
In-House
DNPH
Reagent Blank
4.75
2.32
39.9
< 0.992
< 0.848
<1.16
< 0.896
< 0.739
<1.02
< 0.922
< 0.797
<3.82
< 0.973
< 0.993
DNPH
Reagent used
in the field
24.9
<2.76
50.2
<2.08
< 1.78
<2.44
<1.88
<1.55
<2.13
<1.93
<1.67
<7.99
<2.04
<2.08
Field Blank
(DNPH &
Rinses)
48.9
29.4
246
<7.28
<6.22
<8.53
<6.57
<5.42
<7.45
<6.76
<5.84
<28.0
<7.14
<7.29
7-17
-------
TABLE 7.10
METHOD 0011 FIELD SPIKE RECOVERY RESULTS
Spiked Compound
Acetaldehyde
Formaldehyde
Calculated Catch, mg
1.32
1.40
Percent Recovery
82.2
87.3
Method QC
Limits
80-120
80-120
7-18
-------
APPENDIX A
RAW FIELD DATA
-------
APPENDIX A. 1
RAW FIELD DATA
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
-------
APPENDIX A. 1.1
RAW FIELD DATA
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
VOLATILE ORGANIC HAPS
-------
5oa
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
r.nMPANY- Poos
so/ 6
/^/2--
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
27^60
^7^-(x-z.
2-)?2.->l
27^3,^3
1^,5. 5,^3»^
Rotometer
Setting
0.3
<^-S
^,3
.0.3
y
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
/<^
/ d?5"
•A> 5
/o <•
/
bC - /^ 5T -/
5-^5"X
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
4
y
v
V
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:
Vrtd= Vm(liters) xYx^7.647x
4.157
-------
-JOC3 CZS
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
DATE:
TIME:
CITY:
>vto
METER.*:.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg:.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:__l2_
RUN#:—V-^
Y-FACTOR:-
OPERATOR:.
, 006
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
Time, (min.)
I
Sample
Time
(min)
0
5
10
17-
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
&'H.
10 rf
ioz.^1
toZC,
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
•271? $ 11
2-?£z,&-L
21 F?.6/ '
^13%, 4&
MK*V.7/
Rotometer
Setting
Q. 3
^, "^
/j,^
o.-b
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
/ ~?
'./^'^
^~l
sT» /^
^ -y-^
Vacuum,
(in.Hg)
3
^
^
4^
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:
Pb (in.Hg)
Vrtd= Vm (liters) x Y x 17.647 x
Tm(°R)
vrtd=
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
Dog. f?u/>
DATE:—
TIME:
METER*
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg:.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:
CITY'
LOCATION1 a*«
RUN #: V - ; ~ '3
Y-FACTOR:
PURGE TIME:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
Pre-test:
Post-test:
7
Time, (min.)
2.0
Sample
Time
(min)
-/T
5
10
it
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
/c 5^
jii. f of. "Vxi>
# /^ 3?
16 W
f*y<<
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
^i^.i.r
27
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY:^
DATE: (
TIME:
METER #:
LOCATION:.
RUN #:-3^_
Y-FACTOR:.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg: '3Q- !/ _ OPERATOR:^
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, °F:
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
_• /.5
Time, (min.)
2.0
Sample
Time
(min)
0.
5
/O
12^
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
'O^7
ttfo^
//o-i
uol
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
2^?3. 7%
•z~i^^oo
Z79f, z^
2-7^.^3
, , ^ r\c
Vf^ «• ••? VS
~ S-65
Rotometer
Setting
0.3
0. 3
. 3
dZ>.'^»
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
^ yof
Af
/^> f
y 0 ?
y"» / 6 •?
Sc~1 °/\
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
y
-y
^
V
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:.
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Y x 1 7.647 x Pb(i
m
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY-
HATP-
TIME:
CITY'
METER'*:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:.
RUN #: V-2
Y-FACTOR:
OPERATOR:-
PURGE TIME:.
> o&C?
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
IS
to
Time, (min.)
Sample
Time
(min)
o
5
10
12-
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
I4$-I
i4oz.
l£0 1
/5o^
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
2.S&O«°°
-2G-L-
VS 6*1 1 4S
240& 3^
w^ 5:^3^
Rotometer
Setting
d?.3>.
Q. 3
6. 3
O '-3.
/
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
10 £
^-S
io£
'05
5T-= S^<: >/
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
^
^
-T
^
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:.
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Y x 17.647 x -M
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
nnMPAMv- ptf.a.,,. r,^r.
DATE: 6- 2.5-*n
TIME:^ /^3- /52S
/ u Ifj.
CITY:_
LOCATION: fig/*
RUN #: /" ?.-'
METER #:-
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg:.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F: :
Y-FACTOR: L
OPERATOR:^
PURGE TIME:.
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg) Time, (min.)
to
Sample
Time
(min)
0
5
to
12.
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
•iSl3
iSti
/523
yszjr
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
2Lft?S.56>
T&n^t
ztot*^
2.f)0,/
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY:.
DATE: L
CITY:.
/ftf)
RUN*:—y=-
METER #:_^
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:.
Y-FACTOR:
OPERATOR:^
PURGE TIME:-
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
Time, (min.)
JO
10
Sample
Time
(min)
D
5
10
/z~
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
,*3l
tSiff
&4l
wz
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
2tf70. (*o
^>fi. 1^5
ZfW. ^
2*/3. $1
^^ y. 7v
Rotometer
Setting
0.3
o. 3
o » S
-------
Sal
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY:-!^
DATE:_J;
TIME:
Mo
LOCATION:
RUN #: V
*V?
METER #:_k^__^
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg:. 3° • >l
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:_
Y-FACTOR: _
OPERATOR"
PURGE TIME:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
Pre-test:
Post-test:
Time, (min.)
2
Sample
Time
(min)
O
5
JO
'•Z.
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
/$**
/533
;&$
/t,oo
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
-2f /5, ?V
^^n.^o
2-tZQ. 15
•3-tt). /$
I/*'- $-^
Rotometer
Setting
0.3
^-3
0.3
^>* 3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
[o
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY:
DATE: (L
TIME:—
P.ITY- &,
METER *• *B - *
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg: 3Q./6
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, °F:_
RUN#: V- *
Y-FACTOR: LL.
OPERATOR: 7-
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
•5 is
Time, (min.)
/. 3*
10
Sample
Time
(min)
O
5
ib
1 1~
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
D
&^7-\
£>*12C,
&0|^<{
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
2022. V&
2%2.5u ^0
z.'&zs: ,?.&
zgzq. Z.H
Rotometer
Setting
o. ^
o . 3
4 .3
a . 3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
f/
?Z
?3
^y
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
5
.5"
£
^
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Yx 17.647X -Pb(it
m
6. IS I
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
LOCATI O N •
RUN #: -
DATE:—
TIME:—
METER.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg: 30". A? OPERATOR:.^
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, °F:__2^_ PURGE TIME:_
Y-FACTOR:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
(5 /^
Time, (min.)
z.
I
Sample
Time
(min)
O
S
/<3
>1-
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
6?3/
^?f3C=
62-^5
ZttS. 3<3
2*3t. 23
Rotometer
Setting
o.3
•o.Z
*.?>
°- 3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
fV
^
fjf
V-7
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
S
S
J5-
jr •
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:.
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Yx 17.647x
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY-
//no
TIME:
METER *-
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg:
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, °F:_^
LOCATION:-^
RUN #: V'
OPERATOR:
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg) Time, (min.)
Sample
Time
(min)
&
5
fO
/2-
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
rtHC,
61 Sf
olx.
^5
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
•2.f J6y 5_5"
^8b$, ^3
ZW. 05
ztqz.qz
Rotometer
Setting
*.$
o-3
c?.3
£, 3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
9%
W
fOG>
fo*
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
>S
5
vS
^
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding contciiner:.
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Yx 17.647X -^
'ml M)
Vstd=
-------
it.
t~i era
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY-
nip/-
/OOi
TIME-
METER
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, °F:.
RUN #: _ t/^^-
Y-FACTOR: _ /3
6.3
o.3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
'61
/^2>
/4?>
/#??
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
5
5
f
J~
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:.
V(rtd= Vm(liters) x Y x 17.647 x PbTq";"g)
' M
v=
,td
JUl
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
nPMPANV- 1U
DATE: I.-1**.
TIME:
METER #:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F: %£.
LOCATION:
RUN #: \f
Y-FACTOR:
/>
PURGE TIME:.
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg)
Time, (min.)
Z
I
Sample
Time
(min)
d
£
/o
JL-
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
IH/0
Hi '5
/^zc?
^^"
K^^
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
^m 6 3
275V, O
•1*5?, IS
2S&. 2?
Rotometer
Setting
^-3
.'^.J
o.>
0,3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
/o3
A?2-
/02-
/ot-
V
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
^5T
3
^
s5*
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Y x 1 7.647 x PbT('"0p.g)
•mk HJ
v =
std
-------
a DC
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
r.DMPAMV
DATF- L
TIME:
r*.|TY'
C/~*«^,
METER #:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE, °F:
RUN #:—V-
Y-FACTOR: I'
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg) Time, (min.)
/s
Sample
Time
(min)
O
$
/o
11
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
WZ4
Htf
>*&
yi36
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
2*_f'?.2 -} i
Rotometer
Setting
ff.3
0.3
0,5
0. 3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
/03>
/d3
/o ,3
/<3 3
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
6
6
6
6
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:.
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Yx 17.647 x Pb(i"0"g)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
COMPANY:.
DATE: k.
TIME:
METER #:_
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:.
CITY'
I nr ATI n M •
RUN #: K
Y-FACTOR:
-7.
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg) Time, (min.)
Sample
Time
(min)
6
5
IO
\T~
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
HHf
Wl
tfv
)^1
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
^^^ ^^
•2*4121
ittn.so
£$ M. 10
Rotometer
Setting
o.$
0..3'
0.3
J,3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
/^3
/Z?"b
/<5Z_
/^3
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
5
S
5
_?•
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:
V^* Vm(liters) x Yx 17.647x -M
V*-
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST) SAMPLING DATA
CITY:
/no
DATF'
TIME:
— "2-
METER #:—
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg:.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE,°F:
RUN #:—v-V-
Y-FACTOR: L
OPERATOR:—!:
PURGE TIME:
Pre-test:
Post-test:
LEAK CHECK DATA
Vacuum
Initial, (in. Hg) Final, (in. Hg) Time, (min.)
Sample
Time
(min)
o
5
10
\^
Clock
Time,
(24-hr)
H31
~yj^ftfo<{
]tj&q
JS\\
Meter
Volume,
(liter)
?*&. /7
2^7 2, 2^
2^7^/75*
Zf 76.05L
Rotometer
Setting
^-i
<^-3
^3
o, 3
Dry Gas
Meter Temp.,
(°F)
;63
/d3
/^2_
/*'*-
Vacuum,
(in. Hg)
5
5
^
^S
Nitrogen purge/activated carbon packing in sample holding container:.
Vrtd= Vm(liters) x Yx 17.647x -^!£»SL
'ml n)
-------
APPENDIX A. 1.2
RAW FIELD DATA
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC HAPS
-------
Plant
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
:: _D/*KQ_ A>
Date: £-
Sampling Location:
'£XJT..
Inside of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple: /£>:<"
Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Nipple (Nipple Length):
Stack I.D.: y/ *" "
Distance Downstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance B):
* inches / Stack I.D. m _ dd
Distance Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A):
- inches / Stack I.D. -
dd
Calculated Bv: 7"« /K
Schematic of
Sampling Location
Traverse
Point
Number
/
<2-
•}
'f-
5"
£
Fraction
of
Length
n*n
IH<(e
<44>ff
*l-o,y
fr.y
f5-^
Length
(inches)
/£JLf/
i
>
Product of
Columns 2 & 3
(To nearest 1/8")
7& "
J3 % "
Hf "
//// "
/3^ "
/v
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Plant:
Sampling Location: * r
Run#:_
Date:
Clock Time: ( **; 3o
4
Operators:
Static Pressure, in. HUP: ^ '-
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg:
Moisture, %: - z- */C Molecular wt, Dry: _ PitotTube, Cp:
Stack Dimension, in. Diameter or Side 1 : fs.y' Side 2: f^.s
Wet Bulb, °R.
Dry Bulb, °R.
Travcre*
Point
Number
\
T_
3
4
•C
4>
Vttedty
H«ad
ln.H20
o.b
6.8^
0-lt
l.-z-o
o.yt
o.8i"
^-OWT-
Stack
Temp.
r* ° v ^
(^ 3
i«r e>
(81 S
I8f ^~
|8f CP
(8| H-
A*? -
•3.0
f*. (04,6
Md » (0.44X%CO2)
Md-(0.44x
Md-
(0.32x
TS-
{0.28x
100
Too" ~~iob~
°F- °R(0F + 480)
,-Pb+.S£--( ) +
In. Hg
i3.e
V«-85.48 xCpX
Va-85.48 X(
Va- */
Aa- ft;
QaoVaxAaxeOa/m
^r J T»(°R)
PaxMa
)x
08-
Qs-
xeo
Q»8td-
aefm
Pa
^^^^^
Ta
X 17.647 X-
dscfm
100
-------
fciUJLSSJCSU
37 PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
FIELD DATA
- 2 5-
Plant
Date
Sampling Location BA»rtouSg.
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Barometric Pressure (8 ) 3Q-H
Static Pressure (P. ) "*" \ • H
Filler Numbcr(s)
Pretest Leak Rale = -OCH cfin @
Pretest Pilot Leak Check GOOD
Pretest Orsal Leak Check
.in.llg
«»
c:o
('iinilciiscis
V,: Silicu gel
Tolall^O
Piobc l-cnglh and Type _
Pilot Tube I.D. No
Nuzzle I.D. .P^S
Assumed Moisture, %
Meter Dos Number _
Meter A 11®
Meter Gamma
Referenced p
.05-
Read and Record all Data Every
Pa ge f of /
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point La
Temp. Sensor ID No.
OU|
Post Test Leak Rale = -QQl
Post Test Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsal Leak Check
in.llg
TIIVCIM
I'oinl
Number
Sampling / dock Time
Time. / (24-hour
(mb.) / clock)
liu Meier
Reiding
Vctodlf
iieid4 r.
b. IhO
OiiTice Pie*. Dilfeicnlial
(fill) b. II2O
Slick
Temp. »P
Aftuil
node
Temp. / filter
Temp-'F^SP
Temp.
•F
DryCi
Inicl
CM Meier Temp.
Lhillcl
l~lhn.l F
liinip
Vacuum
lo llg
o
/ (OOP
.05"
±1£_
•2.. "7
&
I
/ IOCS'
as
2.5-
lo)
CrO
IS'
2>.0
IS"!
IPS'
foO
10
lO
Z 5"
lor
3.SI
•23 L, /
10
H
[030
3.5TI
is-?
101
/ 1035-
icse.se>
Gt (
2.37 /
\0l
S"
/ IO4S"
/
z.f
s't
10
.be
ion
Lo
3-5
B d,
m
n\
in
$8
vn
IO0
.11
ISO
184-
10=1
3
V
J2=-
O
2.
/ 1 0 /
2T
6"?
M-
K
tlv/
-------
Plant:
IU^
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Sample Location:
Sample
le Box No.:.
Run No.:
Job No.:
Filter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Filter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container NQ-
Liquid Level Marked:.
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
CONTENTS
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
WEIGHT farams)
INITIAL
FINAL
NET
7.9
0
((DO INS l-{f(.C
\Co
I CO
(I..)
6
TOTAL
Description of Impinger Catch:
-------
IM PACIHC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
FIELD DATA
Dale (Q
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
MAD
DaromctricPressure (g ) •So.q
Static Pressure (P, ) 4- V.M
Filler Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate = -°°s' cfin @
Pretest Pilot Leak Check C1^
Pretest Orsal Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
Page 1 of f
.Inllg
co,
0, _
CO
—
—
('iinilciiscis
/, : Silica gel
Total 11,0
Piobc length aiiJType
Pilot Tube I.D. No. —
Nozzle 1.D
>?' 6J&SS
G_
Assumed Moisture,'
Meier Ikii Number
Meler&ll®
Meter Gamma
Referenced p
MBIS"
FIT?
Post Test Irak Rale = .&o.S
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point La
Temp. Sensor ID No.
oul
Post Test Pilot Leak Check Cfc.
Post Test Orsal Leak Check
cfmffi
in. I IB
Tuvcne
Point
Number
Sampling
Time,
("•b)
I
dock Tfaae
JJ4-hour
clock)
Uu Melei
Reiding
Velocity
U»d4 t,
b. lljO
Oiibe Pic*. Dincieotiil
Detbed
Artuil
Slick
Temp. *F
1
Piohe
Temp. / fitte?
lnipio|er
Temp.
•F
CM Meter Temp.
Inlcl
Uullel
liimp
Vacuum
1° llg
0
5" / / S66
N4
ICH
»PM
i o
JA
2X3
5"?
isL
to tr
c
IS
23-7 /
-------
L/0£
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant-
Date:
Sample Location-
Sample Type- \MmAmo?
Sample Box No.:
Kk>- C
Run No.:
Job No.: ^40*?-
Filter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
il/WM
FRONT HALF
-Acetone
Container No.:
Filter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
Liquid Level Marked:.
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
CONTENTS
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
WEIGHT farams)
INITIAL
FINAL
NET
0
tvi
lOo
. (
600
6
TOTAL
Description of Impinger Catch:
-------
JU PACIRC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
FIELD DATA
Dale P^"
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (P. )
Filler Number(s) _
Pretest
) 3g>,/o
J- I.H
. cfin @
/
'
Pretest Pilot Leak Check _
Pretest Orsal Leak Check /^A
CO
CniKlciiscis
V,: Silic:igcl
Total I £ (>
I'lubc Ixngih and Type
Pilot Tube I.D. No.
Nozzle I.D.__Z2«!
Assumed Moisture, % *2*
Meier Dot Number _f*& **"
MelerA lltfa /,?O(~ cfm @
Post Test Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsal Leak Check
in llg
I*unip
Vacuum
'° "»
Tnvene
Total
Number
•pibTT
me, /
fa) /
Sanplbg
Time,
(mi
dock Time
(24-hour
clock)
Gu Meier
Readb|
(^>« 3
Vek)cll|
leid4 t.
b. MjO
OiuVePie«.Uilleieallil
•SiET
Temp. »F
Tcmp./FiHtr
Daked
Achiil
Impio(cr
Temp.
•F
Dra I
"Tiilel
Gat Meier Temp.
Uuilcl
VT/
3L.
/
2.2. ."
A
urn-
3*1 i (*.,
g>7- / 5?
rs
ID
ai.-l
£•• US
Tz
45"
n5
7~TT
6
%:
61
m
13
100
51 i
731 I 57
/£>/
/V
/or
ff
•Z37/
7"?
rr
/-OB
ge
/*?•
toy
• Vs
z
rw
JC
z .a
/V
it
ft
i
737 / 57
-*-
?T
3.
c,/
no
III
/JO
IA"»,
-------
Plant
Date;
•• Kte
SAM LE RECOVERY DATA
Run No.:
_ Job No.:
SampteBoxNo.:_^
Sample Location:
Sample Typft.
- C
<""
Rlter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HAU
Acetone
Container No.
Liquid
Sealed:
Filter
Container 1
Description
Samples S
BACK HAL
Container 1
Liquid Lev<
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Un • r Sealed-
i of Filter:
tored and Locked:
F/MOISTURE
Mo-
al Marked: Sealed:
CONTENTS
((WTw tos-3
K-«. M.
Itflbc. lU
{•^PL^ iti 6
«wr
^Gtl
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
-
O
Veb
VOD
0
—
\A
INITIAL
?H.>
A-^-4
6^^ *^
~?tff\^r
&ff\A
4U.L
fEIGHT (arams^
FINAL
•s\5.r
6DO-4
6M.^-
^63-^
6R3
Q3^ l
NET
\-8
43.0
O^
(6-^)
a A
ll'^o
-^llnr —
Description of Impinger Catch-
-------
f •'Q.tf" KOAJ
Dale L
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
FIEI,I)DA"A
Barometric Pressure ..($/) ,50.
Static Pressure (P, ) -*- i. *f
Filler Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rale
Pretest Pilot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check V/y
Read and Record all Data Every
Page | n of 1
.in.llg
CO
C'liiulciiscis
V,: Silica Sel
Tola! II ()
Piubc Ixnglh and Type
Pilot Tube I.D. No
Nozzle I.D
Assumed Moisture, % £-
Meter Rm Number
Meterall®.
Meter Gamma d?'9??-
Reference p S° I*r
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point La
Temp. Sensor ID No.
oul
Posl Test Ixak Rate = J
Post Test Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsal Leak Check
cfm@
A
in.Iig
Tfivcne
mini
Numbcf
'Safflpllng
Time
(min.)
llng /
. /
) /
dock Time
(labour
clock)
Uu Melci
Rcidini
(\b)n
Velodljr
Ileid4 Ti
b. 11)0
Orifice Pica. UiUcieoliil
Slick
ate
Aetuil
Temp. *F
(T.)
I'lOhe
Temp. / Fillet
Temp.»F
Inpinfcr
Temp.
•F
Dry I
"Tnlel
G*t Meier Temp.
Inlet
Uullel
I*uinp
Vacuum
lo.llR
olo /
10
(o
JL
T
r\\
MA.
53,
10
ID 2^
_n_
5\
•Utx
IOI
.15-
nc,
s~?
is:
I_L
L.
IJ3J>
nn
10
/.a:
3
V
It -
m.
J-L
iJL
7/C
J.o
/C
/OS,
,07-
ns
fr.r
(01
,3.0
--tcft
-J
3.0
59
fOTl
-'to
(i
2S I
S
3.7
7Z5
a*
^5:
{(*> I
JT
La
LL
£
-------
PlantL_
Date:_J^
fi SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
ik fLi CcwMtNM Run No.: IfVlWS" -4
Sample Box No.:.
Job No.:
Sample tncatinn- {\vu
Sample Type; \Mrifl.
€
niter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Filter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
Description of Filter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
Liquid Level Marked:.
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
CONTENTS
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
WEIGHT (grams)
INITIAL
FINAL
NET
-4-.
\.6
6SQ.6
Mu I a
6
TOTAL
Description of Impinger Catch:
-------
j /35S.
i i?*1.- 'f i ••<'''*' 1 1*5*1 "•• I
O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Pk.nl DOS- KuO
Date (x-^"^"")
Sampling L
Sample Typ
Run Numbi
Upcralnr
ncalinn (7e^
c MM 5
er F /S
/"louit d-j^v-^-
>
Daromclric Pressure IE ) 2?O . 1
Static Press
Filler Num
Pretest Lea
Pretest Pile
Pretest Ore.
urc (P. ) -f- I . H
ber(s)
k Rate = ^e£
_ draft
1 Leak Check C.L ff 1
n- »•»!
i"1 VH\
1 1 1 411
> n i e>5"
FIELD DATA I,"1
i-n
N
1'iobc length a
Pilol Tube I.D.
Nozzle I.D.
ud Type
."i-St.
Ci
V, : Sil
T«
ica gel
inll^fl
TtjfJ*- ItLlc.**
'
Assumed Moisture, % , O «/•
Mrlrr RI>I Numhrr MT?> /^~
Meter £>ll(i}
Meier Gamma
Referenced p
\ -T^
• V^n
Post Tesl If A Rale = 5t3Z-
Scliemalic of
Traverse Point La
Temp. Sensor ID No.
Velocity
b.
IjO
S^S^S^
(_^-«vt^
l_gc-U_
(_(SQ.lt-
Otulce Pie*. Dilhieolbl
Detbed
^§^^j
1^ , 0 1 ^
tU.. 0
c!^- ' o
Actual
!§^s^s^
^ (o "
30 «2. IS
:>^*2- 1"
cfmO "Selo^ in. lie
Post Tesl Pilot Leak Check C. Ic ^v <*
you! Post Tesl Orsal Leak Check ,
Slack
Temp. • F
IT.)
$$OW^v
•Jy
"-V
f
'/(f^v
c/
Piohe
Temp. / Fillet
Temp.* F
^^^^^
^//i / HA
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Inpiofer
Temp.
•F
^s^^s
f^/&
Dry CM Meter Temp.
Inlet ^
$$$&$$&
HQ
Uullcl
m.n.,,fF
SSw^v^^
M4
I'ump
Vacuum
la. tig
N^SSS^^
A//4
-------
Plant:
Date:
,v. Q SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
\AJ6- KJLU (r\MltovN
ion- FU C~
Sample Box No.:.
Run NO.:
Job No.:
Sample Location:
Sample Type- tyi/itf
Filter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments: •
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Liquid
I evel Marked-
Sealed:
Filter
Container 1
Descriptor
Samples S
BACK HAL
Container 1
Liquid Levi
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mo.: r SealeH-
i of Filter:
tored and Locked:
F/MOiSTURE
Mo:
nl Marked: Sealed:
CONTENTS
wlwf i«*-V
^ect <^.T i*^f
f-lftc ^,o
Wic vUo
iflAf
^vl
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
— •
6
(oo
Vco
c
-
WEIGHT taram
INITIAL
314.8
461-1
a%^
6£>4
6ou8
9m ^
FINAL
^1^.3
49?^'
0 ' -
^.o
s)
NET
Description of Impinger Catch-
-------
APPENDIX A. 1.3
RAW FIELD DATA
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
ALDEHYDES AND KETONES
-------
13 PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Plant P£VfePA ;
Dale
Sampling Location,
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
FIELD DATA
( oo //^
Barometric Pressure (g )
Static Pressure (P, ) ±.
Filler Number(s)
- 1
Pretest Leak Rale ** O-ooi dm i
Pretest Pilot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
.in. llg
CO
(Ninilciiscis
V,: Silica gel
Total 10
Pi otic I -cnglh and Type
I'ilol Tube I.D. No.
Ninzle I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Meier Doi Number
Meter&llfii) /•£
Meter Gamma
Referenced p
?-. *>'
Read and Record all Data Every
Page / of ^
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Temp. Sensor ID No.
Post Test Uak Rate = O.C&O elm @ V- *" in. llg
Post Test Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
rump
Vacuum
Jo. llg
TIIVCIK
Point
Number
SamplingI
Time. /
ft"°i /
o
Oock Tine
(24-hout
clock)
GuMelcT
Reidinf
Vcbcili
icid4 r
b. 1120
OiiTiccPici.DUIcicollal
Attutl
Slick
Temp. »F
1
PiSRe
Temp. / FUlei
Teap.*F
Iropm(e(
Temp.
•F
DtrC
"TnlcT
Gu Melei Temp.
Uullel
O.7O
CrH
/CO
"775.VQ
/^'3
f.J
&G_
0*1
££_
17
/T?
luo
0.1 1
Of
O-6.7
•**
A /
//I'-"
0-71
121
_2L
O.7C
lot
91
0-in
&•**
O-&
l-ol
Lot
7-7
J.4k-S~
0*7
ILL
loo
9*V1
ML
J0j_
A./
Q^L
100
fert.to
JM.
&L
0/7X
0>7V
S3.-7.ei*
/
300
M.
/crt
it
-------
Plant:
Date:.
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Run No.:
I Job No.:
Sample Location:.
Sample Type:_]M£C>li
Sample Box No.:
Ho
RlterNo.:
M/t
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Container No.:
Filter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
M/Jl
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
Liquid Level Marked:
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
CONTENTS
CNP14 fkv-
r\A»oii }/ I
l/i>T H VLcc^je**-'
JW*t"
~?t Gc |,
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
lOo
(00
0
~
WEIGHT (arams^
INITIAL
^^
6?tf
-------
I.'
e 17?
«")
ig^yr^yCfre-.
O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Plant
Dale ...f. . . .
Sampling Location $S~ /WA.»^./ 0 <^Lf .
Sample Type /4^/JuJ,yAv~, (Of) J/)
Run Number
Operator
DaromctricPressure (i ) 7c?./
Static Pressure (IJ ) 4 /.V
Filler Numbers)
Pretest Leak Rale
Pretest Pilot Leak Check _
Pretest Orsal Leak Check .—
FIELD DATA
.in.llg
<(),__
CO
NT
(Nniilcii.se is
V,: Silica gel
Total ILO
Probe Ixngili and Type
Pilot Tube I.D. No. —
Nozzle I.D £1
Assumed Moisture,'
Meter Dos Number
MclcrAll®
Meter Gamma
Refcrcncai p
?.f
Read and Record all Data Every
Page / of /
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point La
Temp. Sensor ID No.
you!
Post Test Ixak Rale = _£;
Post Test Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsal Leak Check
cfmffi)
in.llg
Tuvcrae
Point
Number
Sampling
Time.
lElli
To
LI
dock Time
(labour
clock)
Gu Meier
Reading
vetodly
lleid^ t,
b. 1120
Oiific* net. DineicolUI
Slick
Temp.
riohc
Dalied
Actutl
Temp. / Fillet
Temp.* F
Impingcr
Temp.
•F
Ptyl
"Tnfci
Gil Meter Temp.
Uullel
111 nip
Vacuum
In.llg
O
4_L
o><*
loi
_io±_
l.\f
0.71
S&X I
l.Tf
Of)3
L1L
n
1.1
etr
ml
3-0
//v
/Of
o,t\
0X0
/o
.of
a?*
O.to
£0
0*1
#0
in
/0-7
Cl
//v
9.oo 10 6.S'
330 1
fol
iS*?
/7V
$
/rr
.*?
Q,
O.7?
O.77
-7?* /
D'l
ten
G™.
1&2-
T7x"
1 /Se-
fo-7
tf
^£
Ji.
to*
0
ri
J^JL
.fcl
j£ti.
2.
0<
//r
•rW
\ft
<
e -70
111
M.
3.-0
//.rfoi
£•*,?
JJ±
-------
Plant:
Date:
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Run No.:
- ^
Sample Box No.:.
.inhNn- 5461" 603
Sample Location:.
Sample Type- IjulmKNfl QOit
Filter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Filter
Container No.:
Liquid
I ex/el Marked-
Sealer!'
Sealed:
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No :
Liquid Lev<
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
al Marked: Sealed!
CONTENTS
CNA* W
W^J
i/*r
^ Gl
".t
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
!U)
(ou
0
—
WEIGHT (arams)
INITIAL
T^.6-
6m?
S3fr4
864.1
FINAL
q^^
64o>
-------
@ PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
2.00
>• 0 fe^
FIELD DATA
;7sr
3ftO
t*i
'.m
,1.
o •?'
I'lanl
Dale
Sampling Location ffi'
Sample Type A'DtA.t,
Run Number
Operator
T
•*• \M
Barometric Pressure (i ) .
Static Pressure (IJ )
Filler Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rale = Q.0o\
Pretest Pilot Leak Check _
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
Page / of I
30./0
. cftn @
•7-t
CO
N
G im Ic users
V( :
Total I J ()
Piohc length and Type
Pilot Tuhc I.D. No
Nozzle I.D rf
n
Assumed Moisture, %
Meter B<« Number
Meier A 11®
Meter Gamma
Referenced p
r
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point La
Temp. Sensor ID No.
rout
Post Test Leak Rale = O.OOO
Post Tesl Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsal Leak Check
cfm@
Irapioger
Temp.
•F
in.llg
|*ump
Vacuum
ID. llg
Tfivcne
Point
Numbci
Simpllng
Time,
(min.)
Z
dock Tine
(labour
clock)
CuMelei
Reading
Vclociir
Il»d4 r.)l (£*,
Q*"
0*0
61
/COL
SO
inn-It
0.71
Ian
S7
f-lO 1
o.w
sr*
o-v
0-71
/07
/. fr-
J/^
O.77
no
10-7
ST /
0.61
tx
/. 7
6,0
A 7
/ 7
7o
0.C7
0.67
/8~7
/ 7
Zl
/.*
/07
97
0.7*1
lO 1
_?L
too /
0.57
too
/
in
p.7? fl .7T
0.7^f
LSI.
nt.
$-0
-U^L
loo
ttL
0.71
-------
Plant:
K A SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
ite HAt^
Date; Cofefo
Sample Location:.
Sample Type:__
le Box No.:
Run No.:
Job No.:
S46 -
Rlter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Filter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
Liquid Level Marked:
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
CONTENTS
OwPri-
OK PA
I IA T"" - *
1 Jv\ I
[/* L (
^^l
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
ICo
100
0
-
WEIGHT faramsl
INITIAL
Wr*
($Q& ^>
^^>(s -(f
O^S^l
FINAL
^%fT
644:^"
^(c<\
ff^O-O
NET
|«U
6.^
a.3
iM
"^•f
Description of Impinger Catch:
-------
It
n
300
i. lot
HI PACIRC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
FIELD DA'I'A
L /3.C, /fin
Plant .
Dale .
Sampling Location
Sample T>pc
Run Number
Operator
+1.1
Barometric Pressure (i ) _
Static Pressure (B )
Filler Number(s) _,
Prelcsl Leak Rate =O-OOj
Pretest Pilot Leak Check _
Pretest Orsal Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
Pa ge I o f /
to.
.c6n@ IO'^ In. I
0,
CO
—
Ciiiiilcnscis
V,: Silica gel
Totally O
I'robc length and Type
Pilot Tube I.D.j
Nozzle I.D..
n TFE
Assumed Moisture,'
Meier Do* Number
McicrMKa)
Meter Gamma
Referencoa p ,
/vr /o
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Temp. Sensor 10 No.
Post Test l-eak Rale = Q.OOl cfm @
Post Test Pilot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in.
I'll nip
Vjcuum
Iti 111
Trivcne
I'olDl
Number
Stapling
Time,
Jmb.1
pitoTT
'• /
1_I_
dock Tine
(14-hour
clod)
Cu Meier v
Reidiag
Velodii
b. 1120
OiiT«Pia Diirc.cD.U
Slid
Temp. "F
Detbed
Actuil
ProFe
Temp. / Filler
Teiap.* F
Temp.
•F
Dry!
"Tnlei
Gn Meier Temp.
Inlet
Uullcl
A I
/
£L
OM_
MA.
100
/oo
_i£-
_LOJ_
loo
JO.
•7
too
0.1 fa
c?.
(0)
OS" /
&.1JL
176
M&.
I0\
O.C&00 *<
JJ2-
>-7*>
O -ITS'
G/
3.9?
/W
/Of
0.7*
OJsl
O.Y1
G 1
o:
0.10
/Vft
It,
/or
/
rf 1
0.
IIC
/e>y
Co 1
&•<
0,71
/8-O
r.
tin
70 /
>-7^
f/Q
in in.
Gl
li?
tor
3* L
a?/ ;
JJ£-
&j_
o.
_22_
10J>_
. X
L_LQ_
U±.
loo
in_
M
0'
ILL
i&_
//v
107
Q'-K
*
foe
C?-7V
m.
lal.
-------
Plant
Date:
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
.- lite Uk VM*\ U
Sample Location:
Sample Type:.
Sample Box No.:.
Run No.:
Job No.:
- 4-
|/UODi-.L
Rlter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments :
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Rlter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
CONTENTS
MA
OrtW-
\MT
C Q\.
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
I*
(Cto
G
—
WEIGHT farams^
INITIAL
^08 -3
6*1.4
S3?,8
04^- r
FINAL
^-24-fl
6 3^-:^-
^g4,Q
S?l^
NET
\6-6
7^
\, \
CK
-------
Page / of
Plant Name:
Run Number:
f;.
C/*7
Test Date: _.
Operator: _
Traverse
Point
Number
a. a
'
IfcCI
C)cC
Sampling / Clock Time
Time, / (24-hour
(rain.) / clock)
/ / 0«/>
/
/
/
43L /
/
/
>kt 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Gas Meier
Reading
(V.)ft1
-frtrlt-
lot. -701
lOl.TO*-
?0/.7YO
101JHO
^ On *
O cio
/~) (OO
Ls'
Slack
Temp. ° F
«)
f (& •:
3 (V^
V tf>
Probe
Temp./ Filler
Temp.0 F
" 1
1
1 .
1
£ ~*
U 1
1
£" '
i
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
Impinger
Temp.
•F
•
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
r*N)*p
Uullel
fE0.,,)'F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Ilg
-------
Plant: I f
6
—
WEIGHT (arams^
INITIAL
-$&$
65&?
^?3
64$. )
^ IflWAL
T^V
- I -»«•-(<
^'?OT
•
^t5 i
^-n ^-
w-2^
NET
^^ rt
2 q
O. cr-
^r^
/ 4/ ~7
{^^f, ' 1 » T*
Description of Impinger Catch-
-------
APPENDIX A. 1.4
RAW FIELD DATA
NO. 5 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
CARBON MONOXIDE AND FLUE GAS COMPOSITION
-------
CO Data Day 1
Initial Calibrations
Pre-purified Nitrogen
CO Calibration Data
Date
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
Time CO (ppm)
18:35:30
18:35:40
18:35:50
18:36:00
18:36:10
18:36:20
18:36:30
18:36:40
18:36:50
18:37:00
18:37:10
18:37:20
18:37:30
18:37:40
18:37:50
18:38:00
18:38:10
18:38:20
18:38:30
18:38:40
18:38:50
18:39:00
Average
Initial Calibrations
9102 ppm CO
Date
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
Time CO
18:41:10
18:41:20
18:41:30
18:41:40
18:41:50
18:42:00
18:42:10
18:42:20
18:42:30
18:42:40
-2
-2
-3
-1
-3
-2
-3
-3
-1
-3
-3
-3
-3
-2
-2
-2
-3
-1
-2
-3
-2
-2
-2.3
(PPm)
8990
9038
9048
9039
9001
8980
8971
8980
8989
9001
Cylinder Pre-test Analyzer Post-test Analyzer Analyzer
Gas Analyzer Calibration Analyzer Calibration Drift
Value Response Error Response Error (% of scale)
(ppm) . (ppm) (% of scale) (ppm) (% of scale)
0
3001
5989
9012
-2
3089
6055
9004
-0.02% -2.9 -0.03% 0.01%
0.88%
0.66%
-0.08% 8968 -0.44% 0.36%
Initial Calibrations
5989 ppm CO
Date
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
Time CO
18:43:30
18:43:40
18:43:50
18:44:00
18:44:10
18:44:20
(ppm)
6031
6051
6062
6062
6061
6061
Average 6054.66667
Initial Calibrations
3001 ppm CO
Date
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
Average
Time CO
18:45:10
18:45:20
18:45:30
18:45:40
18:45:50
18:46:00
18:46:10
18:46:20
(ppm)
3089
3089
3089
3089
3089
3089
3089
3089
3089
Average
9003.7
-------
CO Data Day 1
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
Run No. 2
Date
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
Time
19:01:10
19:01:20
19:01:30
19:01:40
19:01:50
19:02:00
19:02:10
19:02:20
19:02:30
19:02:40
19:02:50
19:03:00
19:03:10
19:03:20
CO (ppm)
5871
5892
5902
5891
5883
5883
5882
5892
5891
5892
5882
5883
5871
5902
Average 5887
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
Run No. 1
Date Time CO (ppm)"
06/25/97 19:04:30 5376
06/25/97 19:04:40 5376
06/25/97 19:04:50 5376
06/25/97 19:05:00 5366
06/25/97 19:05:10 5366
06/25/97 19:05:20 5355
06/25/97 19:05:30 5376
Average 5370
-------
CO Data Day 1
Final Calibration
9012 ppm CO
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
19:18:20
19:18:30
19:18:40
19:18:50
19:19:00
19:19:10
19:19:20
19:19:30
19:19:40
8697
9057
9067
9030
8980
8971
8961
8970
8980
Average 8968
Final Calibrations
Pre-purified Nitrogen
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
06/25/97
19:21:20
19:21:30
19:21:40
19:21:50
19:22:00
19:22:10
19:22:20
-4
-3
-3
-3
-2
-3
-2
Average -2.9
-------
CO Data Day 2
Initial Calibrations
Pre-purified Nitrogen
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Average
Initial
Time CO (ppm)
17:
17:
17:
17:
17:
18:00
18:10
18:20
18:30
18:40
Calibrations
-3
-4
-2
-3
-1
-2.6
Cylinder
Gas
Value
(ppm)
0
3001
5989
9012
Pre-test
Analyzer
Response
(ppm)
-3
3099
6121
8960
CO Calibration Data
Analyzer
Calibration
Error
(% of scale)
-0.03%
0.98%
1.32%
-0.52%
Post-test
Analyzer
Response
(ppm)
-2.3
8872
Analyzer
Calibration
Error
(% of scale)
-0.02%
-1.40%
Analyzer
Drift
(% of scale)
0.00%
0.87%
9102 ppm CO
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Time
17:19:40
17:19:50
17:20:00
17:20:10
17:20:20
17:20:30
17:20:40
17:20:50
CO (ppm)
8925
8953
8972
8975
8964
8964
8952
8973
Average
8959.75
Initial Calibrations
5989 ppm CO
Initial Calibrations
3001 ppm CO
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Average
Time
17:21:20
17:21:30
17:21:40
17:21:50
17:22:00
17:22:10
17:22:20
17:22:30
17:22:40
CO (ppm)
6695
6084
6045
6054
6045
6053
6045
6045
6024
6121.1
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Time
17:23:10
17:23:20
17:23:30
17:23:40
17:23:50
17:24:00
17:24:10
17:24:20
17:24:30
17:24:40
17:24:50
CO (ppm)
3279
3090
3090
3091
3090
3079
3091
3091
3091
3091
3009
Average
3099.3
-------
CO Data Day 2
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
Run No. 3
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Time
17:53:10
17:53:20
17:53:30
17:53:40
17:53:50
17:54:00
17:54:10
17:54:20
17:54:30
17:54:40
17:54:50
17:55:00
17:55:10
17:55:20
17:55:30
CO (ppm)
5626
5656
5666
5666
5656
5666
5665
5666
5666
5656
5666
5656
5666
5656
5636
Average 5657.9
-------
CO Data Day 2
No. 5 Baghouse Outlet
Run No. 4
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Time
17:26:20
17:26:30
17:26:40
17:26:50
17:27:00
17:27:10
17:27:20
17:27:30
17:27:40
17:27:50
17:28:00
17:28:10
17:28:20
17:28:30
17:28:40
17:28:50
17:29:00
17:29:10
17:29:20
17:29:30
17:29:40
17:29:50
CO (ppm)
5904
5904
5904
5904
5904
5894
5894
5904
5904
5904
5904
5912
5913
5904
5904
5913
5904
5904
5895
5904
5904
5894
Average 5903.4
-------
CO Data Day 2
Final Calibrations
Pre-purified Nitrogen
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Time
18:05:30
18:05:40
18:05:50
18:06:00
18:06:10
18:06:20
18:06:30
18:06:40
18:06:50
18:07:00
CO (ppm)
-3
-2
-2
-2
-3
-3
-1
-2
-2
-3
Average -2.3
Final Calibrations
9012 ppm CO
Date
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
06/26/97
Time
18:07:40
18:07:50
18:08:00
18:08:10
18:08:20
18:08:30
18:08:40
18:08:50
18:09:00
18:09:10
18:09:20
18:09:30
18:09:40
18:09:50
18:10:00
18:10:10
18:10:20
18:10:23
CO (ppm)
8933
8844
8710
8610
8562
8602
8742
8894
8983
8983
8982
8982
8992
8983
8973
8964
8982
8983
Average 8872.4
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
COMMENTS:
SAMPLING TIME (244r CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION__&>*.
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG
i~
fiattHif.mi
COHTlMUOUSt
ANALYTICAL METHOD _
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
P^v. RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
102 (NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
[ACTUAL co READING)
i
ACTUAL
READING
/, Z
££..(*
NET
/- 2_
M
2
ACTUAL
READING
/- 2.
to,*0
NET
/. L
M
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
1.7-
Wc-t
MULTIPLIER
H'lOO
32.'100
^/WO
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
."<•
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLAMT
DATE 6 -2.3-1 "I
TESTIfQ
COMMENTS:
SAMPLING TIME (244.1 CLOCK).
SAMPLING LOCATION.
a/W. V
SAMPLING LOCATION^ &^fa*. «\5a/W
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG.^TEGRATED^CONTINUOUS)
ANALYTICAL METHOP O^A-
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
\^^^ RUN
GAS ^^
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
1
ACTUAL
READING
1,2
**.
NET
rz
;M
2
ACTUAL
READING
(.M
rt.1
NET
,,«.!
*3
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
,i3
.?,«
MULTIPLIER
".'100
32/ioo
a/ioo
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
TOTAL
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
ill
PLANT.
DATE_
fe?
COMMENTS:
HO.
SAMPLING TIKE (244u CLOCK!
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BA^jNTEGRATED>CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD _ ~ ^
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR -21
1O°F
^^\^ RUN
GAS '^v^
C02
02
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT_2Li
DATE
SAMPLING TIME (2Utr CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
COMMENTS:
°IO*F
^^^^ RUN
GAS ^\^
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO|HET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
uo
2.0^
NET
1>°
l^
^>
2
ACTUAL
READING
Vv
»*
NET
\t
^A
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
l^
\«\^
MULTIPLIER
H'100
^.100
(
a/ioo
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
%
-------
APPENDIX A.2
RAW FIELD DATA
NOS. 1, 2, AND 3 BLAST FURNACE OUTLETS
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR RECTANGULAR DUCTS
Jv/v
Plant:.
Date:.
Sampling Location; ft A
i, inches:.
o r AA.C.
of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple:.
Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Nipple (Nipple Length):.
i \j t/ "
Duct Length, inches :___LJLZ
Equivalent Diameter = 2xl_xW/(L + W)=.
Distance Downstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance B):
^ ^T inches / Equivalent Diameter =M& dd
Distance Upstream from Flow Diisturbance (Distance A):
*^(&L> Inches / Equivalent Diameter
Calculated By:_Bd££
dd
LUUL
to
Sampling Location
Traverse
Point
Number
1
7
Fraction
of
Length
fy
3/(t
f
Length
(inches)
It/ 1/"
ft/l/"
Product of
Columns 2 &. 3*
(To nearest 1/81)
'#"
r^"
Nipple
Length
(inches)
£//
Traverse Point
Location
(Sum of Col. 4 & 5)
^&M
^V/L"
If No Ports, Calculate Distances From Stack Walls For Port Locations
Number
of
Ports
Fraction
of
Width
Width
(inches)
Port Location
Product of Col. 2 & 3*
(To Nearest 1/8")
* All points or ports should be an equal distance from each other (D) and 1/2 of
that distance from the stack walls (D/2), where D = Width / # of points or ports
-------
Plant: use--
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Date: n
Barometric F
Moisture, %:
Stack Dimer
Wet Bulb, °F
"lA*v\£ nc
TravsrM
Point
Number
A i
\,
f£ ,
X
r/u=.c-^- Clock Time: If? 36
_ -Wl- jf^^i^. Onerators: A4>6 /ft?
'ressure, in. 1
HP: ftD . 2 O Static Pressure, in. HoO: - / * *T
Mo
sion, in. Diameter
m
leculai
or Sid
Drv
?€>
Vtlodty
Hud
* 1 \
* 13
. 13
- n
- O^r
- 0^
.0 7
.05
/ 12
*l£>
9 t^^r
*]5
r \\
-to S
<^?^% -
-£>.M
••-;•.- 7
^F-0^^
Stack
Temp.
5361 1
553
A^n
Mz
2£>f
Z5fe
i3l
2^^
<3^4
3^7
H
,2
2
~~l
0
^
3 1 <^!>
I
2\B
2^5^-
a^2
2(3
'/•t
'M
•?
^
5
c?
O
0
\)6=)
^o
1§
T«- S^-
• wt.t Dry; Pitot Tube. Cp: ft. ft V
B1: ££* Side 2: iMV" ^"
Bulb, op
Md a (0.44 x %CO^) + (0.32 X %0^) + (0.28 x %l^)
Md»(0.44x ) + (0.32x ) + (0.28x )
fcr«^
Md-
%H.O *H,0
UN • Mrl v M - 1 + IB ( ' \
TS- °F» °R(°F + 4eo)
Pl » Pb i ^'^ rr I ' > +
18.8 l ' 13.8
PC- In. Hfl
^K?-
=: ./ Ts^
Vt- 85.40 xCpx^Px y p,^
V»-«.4BX( )*( )xAI _ ' _
Vs- ft/8
A.- ft2
Qs- VsxAaxeos/m
Qs- x x60
Qt - acfm
O*-&m X 17.847 x x(1 )
«W 100
QBCfm
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT -rA*- *.
DATE u-2-S-t-i
COMMENTS:
JEST no
SAMPLING TIME (24*i CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION &/«s-h
SAMPLE TYPE (BJUUfiTEGRATJfo CONTINUOUS)
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR 21
90"
^^v^^ RUN
GAS ^"^v^
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
3.8
z»-^
NET
3/S
r^l
2
ACTUAL
READING
3^
i.\A
NET
%,?
n.^
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
3-8"
11,5-
MULTIPLIER
M.TOO
/ 32/IOO
^/lOO
a'ioo
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
.Md.
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT TKa. Fbg.
DATE_
- 7.s-
#. 3
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
5, 1 is
/5V7^5%
MULTIPLIER
w/100
/ 32/IOO
a/wo
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
.Md.
''4 .
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT_±h£.
PATE 6-2
COMMENTS:
_TEJT NO.
SAMPLING TIME (Zfbi CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION^
SAMPLE TYPE (BA
NET
^.«
/6^'
2
ACTUAL
READING
^),6
^1-^
NET
^,6
/^•^
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
4,*1'
^.^ '
MULTIPLIER
M/100
/ K.'IOO
a/ioo
a 'loo
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
.%
-------
BE]
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
COMMENTS:
u-u,->h
.TEST NO.
SAMPLING TIME (2«*i CLOCK)
SMPLIN6 LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, TEG
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR 7 .
^ CONTINUOUS) .
\. RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
4,3
v»*
NET
W
|5>
2
ACTUAL
READING
H.S
^
NET
4$
\5,<<
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
4.* '
tf.t>'
MULTIPLIER
44 '100
' 32/IOO
a/ioo
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
>
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR RECTANGULAR DUCTS
Plant:.
Date:.
Sampling Location:.
Duct Width, inches:.
of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple:.
Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Nipple (Nipple Length)- £ W
Duct Length, Inches-. H/V
Equivalent Diameter = 2 x L x W / (L + W) = ff^« ? f
Distance Downstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance B):
«*
. 7« <*
. inches / Equivalent Diameter = O.yfc dd
Distance Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A):
If1
. inches / Equivalent Diameter •
. dd 2.
fP <5- H
\\ 11 U
't e&". . '
- >
\\ ^\ ^ u
A & •'
- ••
* All points or ports should be an equal distance from each other (D) and 1/2 of
that distance from the stack walls (D/2), where D = Width / # of points or ports
-------
/Plant:
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Date:
•$"*!•• ': ,'' '
i^isfi^W^1^}
ffifi£&JKip&i$y&£'*r
(
Sampling Lo
Run#: _£
Barometric F
Moisture, %:
StaclcDfmen
Wet Bulb, °F
Travarea
Point
Numbar
A 1
0
R 1
, 1
61
2
$)(?:}
2
F \
2
F I
2
r-r i
TTv
7
cation: $'3<$)>&rt- ¥o<*&of Clock Time:' (~IJ-\^
tz&urtMSAfa Ttifai&fcg~ f- VAW Ooerators: '^^W /ArO
'ressure, irtl 1
Hg: -3:0. a " Static Pressure. in/HoO: - 2. 2,
Molecular wt.. Drv: Pitot Tube. CD: ^<§H
sion, in. Diameter
•
or Side 1: Side^>
Drv Bulb. °RS
Vatodty
Haad
. 3^%
*3^
. a5
- 2C»
1^
- 21
, 14
, 1-M
* «H<9
-Mfc
.'* 2^
-- 3 (
^ J2.5
* 5^ —
* 13
^ - 6&>3
Stack
Tamp.
°F. t,
V/,
3£1
111
2lJ
^21
25 1
2^
^)£* ^C
^Ci 1 \J
2ff
*O / i
^^•^J^r'
11
SP^
33£.
sAi
o
D
1
^
^
^5
O
\O
£>
c\
&
c>
O
&
c^
A^d
Te- ?6?.^
Md » (0.44x%CO2) -t- (0.32 X%0^) + (0.28 X%^)
. Md-(0.44x ) + (0.32x ) + (0.28x )
(f
Md-
% H.O % H,0
UH v MH Y M . 1 -f 1 B f 1
x£^ f "•* "'*
J^Ea - In. Hg
= J Ta(*R)
Va.85.4«xCpx^Px^ p.^
VB- 65,40 x( )x( )*5f
Va- ft/8
A,- It2
!Q8"VaxAax60a/m
Qs- x X60
Q..U8 acfm
Pa %H^O
Qa..- X 17.647 x x(1 )
etd 100
080^"* -v' dacfm
-------
PLANT.
DATE 6 |K
/a£ KMM
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
COMMENTS:
.TEST
SAMPLING TIME (2«w CLOCK).
SAMPLING LOCATIOM_JL:L
SAMPLE TYPE/fB5fc INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD __
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
^^v,^^ RUN
GAS ^\,
C02
02
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
PCX- Ruax. L
TEKT
COMMENTS:
NO.
SAMPLING TIME (24*r CLOCK).
SAMPLING LOCATION^_±J
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG(ffiTEGRAJ
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR _i
CONTINUOUS).
^^\^ RUN
GAS ^"\
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
I
ACTUAL
READING
2.H
-2&.<~>
NET
2.M
/& 3
2
ACTUAL
READING
•^
20-^
NET
Z^
,^2-
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
2^ -
;?,.z--
MULTIPLIER
' ^'100
32.'IOO
28/100
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
.Md.
TOTAL
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT "TV*
COMMENTS:
TEST NO.
SAMPLING TIME (U*a CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATIOM
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG(lHTEGRA
ANALYTICAL METHOD
INUOUS) .
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE_2£/f_
OPERATOR
SN\X^ RUN
GAS ^^\
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
VZ-
ol^
NET
J*
/ftO
2
ACTUAL
READING
7. i-
^^'
NET
^>^
}*(> 1
\
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
3.^ »
ft'1 v
MULTIPLIER
/
H'loo
/
32.'1M
a/wo
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
\
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PUHT
DATE
Q&Z- R\X\
COMMENTS:
SAMPLING TIME (24* CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG,
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR "T.
3
CONTINUOUS).
>N\s^ RUN
GAS ^x^
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
l.o
ID' %
NET
;,o
)°\^
2
ACTUAL
READING
•1i-Z~
^.0.
NET
K"i-
H$
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
M /
fi'1 '
MULTIPLIER
«/ioo
32/100
n/m
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
•STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
. Md.
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
Please read instructions on the reverse before completing
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-454/R-99-032a
2.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Primary Lead Smelter, Doe Run, Herculaneum, Missouri: Volume I of HI
7. AUTHOR(S)
Frank J. Phoenix
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2077
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Stand:
Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Divi
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2
ADDRESS
sion
7711
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
August 1999
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-D-70069
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Emission Standards Division (ESD) is investigating the primary lead smelting source
category to identify and quantify organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted from blast furnaces. ESD asked EPA's Emissions, Monitoring and
Analysis Division (EMAD), and the Emission Measurement Center (EMC) to conduct the required testing. EMC issued a work assignment to Pacific
Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) to plan and conduct the air emissions test program to gather emissions data as specified in the ESD test request.
The testing program was conducted through EPA Contract No. 68D20162, Work Assignment No. 4-07. The primary objective was to obtain data on the
emissions of volatile and semi-volatile organic HAPs, aldehydes, and ketones from primary lead smelter blast furnaces. A secondary objective was to
obtain data on the emissions of carbon monoxide. The data will be used by ESD to determine whether organic HAPs are emitted at levels that would
justify regulation under the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) program.
The Doe Run Company, which operates a primary lead smelter in Herculaneum, Missouri was selected by the ESD as the host facility for this
project. The Doe Run facility operates three primary lead blast furnaces which smelt concentrated lead ore to produce elemental lead. During normal
operation two furnaces operate simultaneously with the third furnace down for maintenance. All three furnaces are similar in design and operation.
They are semi-batch fed and are tapped continuously. Air emissions from all three furnaces along with fugitive dust from a series of hygiene ventilation
systems are exhausted to a common baghouse and stack. In the stack several independent process air exhausts are combined with the baghouse exhaust.
In order to quantify the furnace emissions, testing was performed in the baghouse exhaust instead of the stack.
In the performance of this test program, PES used EPA Methods 1-4 and 10, SW-846 Methods 0030 and 0010, boiler and Industrial Furnace (B1F)
Method 001 1, and a direct interface, portable gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer.
This volume (Volume I) is comprised of 142 pages and consists of the report text and Appendix A.
1 7. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
a. DESCRIPTIONS
Baghouse
Blast furnace
Emission Measurements
Hazardous Air Pollutants
Primary Lead
Semi- Volatile Organic Hazardous
Air Pollutants
Volatile Organic Hazardous Air
Pollutants
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unlimited
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. COASTI Field/Group
21. NO. OF PAGES
1,322
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
F:\U\FMeadows\TRD.Frm\WP 6.
------- |