United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-99-045a
September 1999
Air
SEPA
Final Report - Volume I of II
Lime Manufacturing
Emissions Test Report
Chemical Lime Company
(Formerly APG Lime Company)
Ripplemead, Virginia
:««^'
-------
LIME MANUFACTURING
EMISSION TEST REPORT
CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY
(FORMERLY APG LIME COMPANY)
RIPPLEMEAD, VIRGINIA
VOLUME I OF II
REPORT TEXT
APPENDICES A & B
EPA Contract No. 68D70069
Work Assignment No. 2-12
Prepared for:
Michael L. Toney (MD-14)
Work Assignment Manager
SMTG, EMC, EMAD, OAQPS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
September 1999
p:\i532\fmrpt\APG\fmalapg.rep (WP.61)
Submitted by:
PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
5001 S. Miami Blvd., Suite 300
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077
(919)941-0333 FAX (919) 941-0234
-------
DISCLAIMER
This document was prepared by Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) under EPA
Contract No. 68D70069, Work Assignment No. 2-12. The field sampling, analyses, and draft
report were completed under EPA Contract No. 68D20162, Work Assignment No. 4-01. This
document has passed PES' internal quality assurance review and has been approved for
distribution. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of
the U.S. EPA. Mention of trade names does not constitute endorsement by the EPA or PES.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOLUME I Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2-1
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS 4-1
4.1 NO. 1 KILN 4-1
4.2 NO. 2 KILN COOLER STACK 4-1
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 5-1
%
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND SAMPLE/
VELOCITY TRAVERSE POINTS 5-1
5.2 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE ... 5-1
5.3 DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND
EMISSION CORRECTION FACTORS 5-1
5.4 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS MOISTURE CONTENT 5-2
5.5 DETERMINATION OF POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS
AND POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURANS 5-2
5.6 DETERMINATION OF TOTAL HYDROCARBONS 5-2
5.7 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER AND METALS .... 5-6
5.8 PULVERIZED COAL FEED SAMPLING 5-6
5.9 PULVERIZED COAL FEED RATE 5-6
5.10 VISIBLE EMISSIONS 5-12
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
AND RESULTS 6-1
6.1 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS 6-1
6.2 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS 6-4
APPENDICES A & B
VOLUME II APPENDICES C-F
in
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
VOLUME I Page
Figure 1.1 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing at APG Lime Company,
EPA Contract No. 68D20162, Work Assignment No. 4-01 1-2
Figure 1.2 Sampling/Monitoring Location, at APG Lime,
Ripplemead, VA 1-3
Figure 4.1 APG Lime Kiln Baghouse Inlet Sampling Location 4-2
Figure 4.2 APG Lime Kiln Baghouse Outlet Sampling Location 4-3
Figure 4.3 APG Lime Cooler Stack Sampling Location 4-4
Figure 5.1 Method 23 CDD/CDF Outlet Sampling Train 5-3
Figure 5.1 A Method 23 CDD/CDF Inlet Sampling Train 5-4
Figure 5.2 . Method 25A Measurement System for THC 5-5
Figure 5.3 Method 29 Particulate Matter/Metals Baghouse Outlet and Cooler
Sampling Train 5-7
Figure 5.3A Method 29 Particulate Matter/Metals Inlet Sampling Train 5-8
Figure 5.4 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fractions 1-4) 5-9
Figure 5.5 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fraction 5) 5-10
Figure 5.6 Method 29 Sample Preparation and Analysis Scheme 5-11
IV
-------
LIST OF TABLES
VOLUME I
Page
Table 2.1 Emissions Test Log APG Lime Company - Ripplemead,
VA 2-2
Table 2.2 CDD/CDF Emissions Sampling and Exhaust Gas Parameters
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet, APG Lime Company -
Ripplemead, VA 2-4
Table 2.3 CDD/CDF Exhaust Gas Concentrations and Emission Rates
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet, APG Lime Company -
Ripplemead, VA 2-5
Table 2.4 CDD/CDF Exhaust Gas Concentrations and 2378 Toxic Equivalent Stack
Gas Concentrations Adjusted to 7 Percent Oxygen, Kiln No. 1 Baghouse
Inlet, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-6
Table 2.5 CDD/CDF Emissions Sampling and Stack Gas Parameters
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Outlet, APG Lime Company -
Ripplemead, VA 2-7
Table 2.6 CDD/CDF Stack Gas Concentrations and Emission Rates
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Outlet, APG Lime Company -
Ripplemead, VA 2-8
Table 2.7 CDD/CDF Stack Gas Concentrations and 2378 Toxic Equivalent Stack
Gas Concentrations Adjusted to 7 Percent Oxygen, Kiln No. 1 Baghouse
Outlet, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-9
Table 2.8 Particulate/Metals Emissions Sampling and Exhaust Gas Parameters
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA .... 2-11
Table 2.9 Particulate Matter Concentrations and Emission Rates, Kiln No. 1
Baghouse Inlet, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-12
Table 2.10 Exhaust Gas Metals Concentrations and Emission Rates, Kiln
No. 1 Baghouse Inlet, APG Lime Company Ripplemead, VA 2-13
Table 2.11 Particulate/Metals Emissions Sampling and Stack Gas Parameters
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Outlet, APG Lime Company Ripplemead, VA .2-15
Table 2.12 Particulate Matter Concentrations and Emission Rates, Kiln No. 1
Baghouse Outlet, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-16
Table 2.13 Stack Gas Concentrations and Emission Rates, Kiln No. 1 Baghouse
Outlet, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-17
Table 2.14 Summary of Total Hydrocarbon Emissions - Kiln No. 1
APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-18
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Concluded)
Page
Table 2.15 Particulate/Metals Emissions Sampling and Stack Gas Parameters
Kiln No. 2 Cooler Exhaust Stack, APG Lime Company -
Ripplemead, VA 2-19
Table 2.16 Particulate Matter Concentrations and Emission Rates, Kiln No. 2
Cooler Exhaust Stack, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-21
Table 2.17 Stack Gas Concentrations and Emission Rates, Kiln No. 2
Cooler Exhaust Stack, APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, VA 2-22
Table 5.1 Sources, Test Parameters, and Test Methods Summary
APG Lime Company - Ripplemead, Virginia . . 5-2
Table 6.1 Summary of Temperature Sensor Calibration Data ... 6-2
Table 6.2 Summary of Pitot Tube Dimensional Data 6-3
Table 6.3 Summary of Dry Gas Meter and Orifice Calibration Data 6-5
Table 6.4 Summary of Orsat Analyzer Calibration Results 6-7
Table 6.5 Summary of Method 23/Proposed Method 29 Field Sampling
QA/QC Data 6-8
Table 6.6 Summary of Calibration Gas Cylinders 6-9
Table 6.7 Summary of Method 23 Standards Recovery Efficiencies 6-10
Table 6.8 Summary of Method 29 Analysis QC Data 6-11
VI
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The U.S. EPA's Emissions Standards Division, Minerals and Inorganic Chemicals
Group (ESD/MICG) is investigating lime manufacturing processes to (1) identify hazardous
air pollutants (HAPs) emitted by coal-fired rotary kilns, (2) identify the sources of the HAPs
emitted, and (3) confirm the existence of major sources. Because lime manufacturing is
similar to portland cement manufacturing, it is believed by EPA that lime plants may also be
major sources of HAPs. There are limited data on HAP emissions from lime manufacturing
processes; therefore additional data are needed to identify which of the 189 HAPs listed in
Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990, are emitted from these
sources.
As part of its investigation, the ESD/MICG has requested that the EPA's Emissions,
Monitoring and Analysis Division (EMAD) test two lime manufacturing facilities. EMAD
issued a work assignment to Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) to plan and conduct
the air emissions testing program to gather emissions data from lime manufacturing processes
as specified in the ESD/MICG test request. The testing program was conducted through EPA
Contract No. 68D20162, Work Assignment No. 4-01.
The APG Lime Company in Ripplemead, Virginia was selected for testing because:
(1) the Kiln No. 1 baghouse stack had a testing platform, and (2) the fabric filter system on
Kiln No. 1 was recently installed. Testing at APG Lime also afforded EPA the opportunity to
compare the performance of a new fabric filter system to that of an existing scrubber system
on a similarly operated kiln at a second lime manufacturing facility that the EPA planned to
test. APG Lime Company is located hi close proximity to the second lime manufacturing
facility. If both were tested during one field trip, then the total cost of the testing program
could be reduced.
The primary objective of the testing program was to obtain data on the emissions from
Kiln No. 1. Measurements were made of total hydrocarbons (THC), dioxin/furan
(CDD/CDF), particulate matter, and metals at the baghouse inlet and outlet. Visible emissions
were read on the baghouse outlet stack. A secondary objective of the testing program were to
obtain data on the emissions of particulate matter and metals from the Kiln No. 2 cooler
exhaust stack.
Figure 1.1 presents the test program organization and major lines of communication.
Figure 1.2 shows the proposed sampling/monitoring locations at APG Lime Company.
1-1
-------
APG Lime Corporation
Raymond G. Roeder, P.E.
(540) 626-8759
PES
OA/QC Officer
Wayne Westbrook
(703)471-8383
Pretest Site
Survey
PES
Site-Specific
Test Plan
PES
EPA/EMC
Work Assignment Manager
Dennis P. Holzschuh
(919)541-5239
PES
Program Manager
John Chehaske
(703)471-8383
PES
Project Manager
Frank Meadows
(919)941-0333
Field
Testing
PES
Subcontractors
DEECO
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
Analyses
PES
Subcontractors
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.
Galbraith Laboratories, Inc.
EPA/ESP
Joseph Wood
(919)541-5446
BSD Contractor
RTI
Cybele Brockman
(919) 990-8603
Report
Preparation
PES
Figure 1.1 Key Personnel and Responsibility for Testing at APG Lime Corporation,
EPA Contract No. 68D20162, WA No. 4-01.
-------
From
Kiln
Stack San
PM/Meta
CDD/CD
THC
CCh,02
i
npling
Is
F
Baghouse
vvvv
1
Atmo
/
-o
sphere
i
Stack
To
Atmosphere
Roof
Stack Sampling
PM/Metals
Cooler Stack
Figure 1.2 Sampling/Monitoring Location, at APG Lime, Ripplemead, VA.
-------
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
This section provides summaries of the test results obtained from the testing program at
the APG Lime Company. Included are the results of the tests conducted for THC, CDD/CDF,
and particulate matter/metals on the Kiln No. 1 baghouse inlet and outlet and particulate
matter/metals on the Kiln No. 2 cooler exhaust stack.
2.1 EMISSIONS TEST LOG
Sampling on Kiln No. 1 was conducted on three consecutive days from October 22, 1996
through October 24, 1996. Sampling on the Kiln No. 2 cooler exhaust stack was conducted on
October 21, 1996. Table 2.1 summarizes the emissions test log. Presented are the run
numbers, test dates, pollutants, run times and downtime for filter changes, port changes, and
CEM calibrations.
2.2 KILN NO. 1
2.2.1 CDD/CDF
The Method 23 sample extracts were first analyzed using a DB-5 capillary column to
determine the concentration of each isomer of CDD's and CDF's (tetra- through octa-). Tetra-
chlorinated dibenzofurans were detected in this analysis; therefore, another aliquot of the
sample was analyzed using a DB-225 capillary column to measure the 2,3,7,8 tetra-chloro
dibenzofuran isomers.
The CDD/CDF test results are presented in actual concentrations and mass emission
rates, concentrations adjusted to 7% oxygen (O2), and concentrations adjusted to 7% O2 in
2378 toxic equivalents. The concentrations, adjusted to 7% O2, were adjusted by each
congeners respective Toxic Equivalency Factor (TEF). The TEFs used are the international
TEF values.
During Run No. M23-8-I it was discovered half-way through the run that the sample
nozzle had been pointing downstream in the duct. As a result it was necessary to restart this
run. In order that the inlet and outlet sampling could be conducted somewhat simultaneously
completion of the corresponding outlet run (M23-8-O) was delayed until the inlet run was
restarted.
2-1
-------
TABLE 2.1
EMISSIONS TEST LOG
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VIRGINIA
Run No.
Kiln No. 1 BH Inlet
M25A-4-I
M23-6-I
M29-13-I
M25A-5-I
M23-7-I
M29-14-I
M25A-6-I
M23-8-I
M29-15-I
Kiln No. 1 BH Outlet
M25A-4-O
M23-6-O
M29-13-O
M25A-5-O
M23-7-O
M29-14-0
M25A-6-O
M23-8-O
M29-15-O
Kiln No. 2 Cooler
M29-10
M29-11
M29-12
Date
10/22/96
10/22/96
10/22/96
10/23/96
10/23/96
10/23/96
10/24/96
10/24/96
10/24/96
10/22/96
10/22/96
10/22/96
10/23/96
10/23/96
10/23/96
10/24/96
10/24/96
10/2496
10/21/96
10/21/96
10/21/96
Pollutant
CDD/CDF
PM/Metals
THC
CDD/CDF
PM/Metals
THC
CDD/CDF
PM/Metals
THC
CDD/CDF
PM/Metals
THC
CDD/CDF
PM/Metals
THC
CDD/CDF
PM/Metals
THC
PM/Metals
PM/Metals
PM/Metals
Run Time
1135-1755
1130-1743
1130-1735
1047-1600
1040-1540
1040-1540
1054-1945
1515-1945
1054-1715
1130-1800
1130-1753
1130-1749
1040-1600
1040-1544
1041-1542
1056-1945
1122-1731
1121-1731
1125-1331
1404-1607
1625-1828
Downtime,
Minutes
45
155
163
53
60
60
53
30
41
30
143
139
37
64
71
42
129
130
6
3
3
2-2
-------
Baghouse Inlet
Table 2.2 summarizes the CDD/CDF emissions sampling and stack gas parameters at the
baghouse inlet. The total sampling time for each run was 240 minutes. The average sample
volume was 96.693 dry standard cubic feet (dscf) or 2.724 dry standard cubic meters (dscm).
The average stack gas temperature was 497 °F and contained 10.3 percent (%) carbon dioxide
(CO2), 13.7% oxygen (O2), and 3.8% moisture. The average stack gas volumetric flow rate
was 108,440 actual cubic feet per minute (acfm) or 53,938 dry standard cubic feet per minute
(dscfm) or 1,527 dry standard cubic meters per minute (dscmm).
Table 2.3 presents the CDD/CDF stack gas concentrations and emission rates. The
average concentration of total CDD was 75 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter
(ng/dscm). The average concentration of total CDD/CDF was 77 ng/dscm. These values
corresponded to average emission rates of 6,968 micrograms per hour (ug/hr) and 7,108 ug/hr,
respectively.
Table 2.4 presents CDD/CDF concentrations adjusted to 7% O2. The measured average
stack gas O2 concentration was 3.8%. Therefore, the adjusted CDD/CDF concentrations were
nearly double the actual concentrations. The average adjusted concentration of total CDD was
149 ng/dscm @ 7% O2. The average adjusted concentration of total CDD/CDF was 152
ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
Table 2.4 also presents the adjusted concentrations in 2378 toxic equivalents. The
average TEF concentration for total CDD/CDF was 0.30 ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
Baghouse Outlet
Table 2.5 summarizes the CDD/CDF emissions sampling and stack gas parameters at the
baghouse outlet. The total sampling time for each run was 240 minutes. The average sample
volume was 158.341 dscf or 4.460 dscm. The average stack gas temperature was 404 °F and
contained 9.0% CO2, 14.6% O2, and 3.6% moisture. The average stack gas volumetric flow
rate was 95,671 acfm or 53,228 dscfm or 1,507 dscmm.
Table 2.6 presents the CDD/CDF stack gas concentrations and emission rates. The
average concentration of total CDD was 1.4 ng/dscm. The average concentration of total
CDD/CDF was also 1.4 ng/dscm. These values corresponded to average emission rates of
122 ug/hr and 123 |ag/hr, respectively.
Table 2.7 presents the CDD/CDF concentrations adjusted to 7% O2. The measured stack
gas O2 concentration was 3.6%. Therefore, the adjusted CDD/CDF concentrations were more
than double the actual concentrations. The average adjusted concentration of total CDD was
2.9 ng/dscm @ 7% O2. The average adjusted concentration of total CDD/CDF was also 2.9
ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
2-3
-------
TABLE 2.2
CDD/CDF EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE INLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Total Sampling Time, min.
Average Sampling Rate, dscfm3
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Average Stack Gas Temp.,.°F
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Stack Gas Volumeric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfma
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
M23-6-I
10/22/96
240
0.391
93.834
2.643
497
13.2
10.7
3.9
103,295
51,576
1,451
102.0
M23-7-I
10/23/96
240
0.415
99.690
2.808
498
13.9
10.3
3.6
109,590
54,368
1540
102.8
M23-8-I
10/24/96
240
0.402
96.556
2.720
497
14.0
10.1
4.0
112,436
55,870
1,582
103.1
Average
0.403
96.693
2.724
497
13.7
10.4
3.8
108,440
53,938
1,527
102.6
a Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm
" Dry standard cubic meters at 20"C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
e Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-4
-------
TABLE 2.3
CDD/CDF STACK GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE INLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
CONGENER
Eiaxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total CDD
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total CDF
Total CDD + CDF
CONCENTRATION8
ng/dscm, as measured
M23-6-I
(0.0076)
13
0.049
6.4
0.053
0.038
0.034
1.3
0.053
0.098
0.30
21
0.015
0.61
{0.011}
{0.011}
0.068
{0.0076}
0.0038
{0.011}
{0.0076}
0.053
0.0076
(0.0076)
0.019
0.023
0.77
22
M23-7-I
{0.0071}
80
0.25
62
0.30
0;53
0.43
20
0.85
1.8
0.15
164
0.039
2.2
{0.039}
{0.043}
0.43
0.039
0.014
{0.018}
{0.0071}
0.14
{0.014}
(0.011)
{0.014}
(0.018)
2.7
167
M23-8-I
0.0074
23
0.085
13
0.11
0.13
0.12
4.3 '
0.19
0.40
0.059
41
0.018'
0.77
{0.015}
{0.018}
0.17
0.022
0.0074
0.011
(0.0074)
0.088
{0.011}
(0.0074)
{0.011}
(0.018)
1.0
42
Average
0.0074
39
0'.13
27
0.15
0.23
0.19
8.4
0.37
0.76
0.17
75
0.024
1.2
0.00
0.00 .<-.
0.22
0.031
0.0085
0.011
0.00
0.092
0.0076
0.00
0.019
0.023
1.5
77
EMISSION RATEb
Mg/hr
M23-6-I
(0.66)
1,144
4.3
557
4.6
3.3
3.0
113
4.6
8.6
27
1,849
1.3
53
{1.0}
{1-0}
6.0
.{0.66}
0.33
{1.0}
{0.66}
4.6
0.66
(0.66)
1.7
2.0
67
1,916
M23-7-I
{0.66}
7,434
23
5,724
28
49
39
1,809
79
164
14
15,146
3.6
201
{3.6}
{3.9}
39
3.6
1.3
{1.6}
{0.66}
12
{1-3} .
{1.0}
{1.3}
(1.6)
253
15,398
M23-8-I
0.70
2,195
8.0
1,263
10
12
11
408
18
38
5.6
3,9.11
1.7
7.3
{1.4}
{1.7}
16
2.1
0.70
1.0
(0.70)
8.4
{1.0}
{0.70}
{1.0}
(1.7)
98
4,009
Average
0.70
3,591
12
2,515
14
22
18
777
34
71'
15
6,968
2.2
109
0.00
0.00
21
2.9
0.78
1.0
0.00
8.5
0.66
0.00
1.7
2.0
139
7,108
" Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 arm.
b Micrograms per hour.
() Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are not counted in totals or
averages.
{} Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are not counted in totals or averages.
2-5
-------
TABLE 2.4
CDD/CDF STACK GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT STACK
GAS CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE INLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
CONGENER
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total CDD
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total CDF
Total CDD + CDF
CONCENTRATION"
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7 percent O2
M23-6-I
(0.014)
24
0.089
11
0.096
0.068
0.061
2.3
0,096
0.18
0.55
38
0.027
1.1
{0.020}
{0.020}
0.12
{0.014}
0.0068
{0.020}
{0.014}
0.096
0.014
(0.014)
0.034
0.041
1.4
39
M23-7-I
{0.014}
160
0.49
123
0.60
1.1
0.85
39
1.7
3.5
0.30
326
0.078
4.3
{0.078}
{0.085}
0.85
. 0.078
0.028
{0.035}
{0.014}
0.27
{0.028}
(0.021)
{0.028}
. (0.035)
5.4
331
M23-8-I
0.015 .
47
0.17
27
0.21
0.25
0.24
8.7
0.39
0.81
0.12 ,
83
0.037
1.6
{0,030}
{0.037}
0.35
0.044
0.015
0.022
(0.015)
0.18
{0.022}
(0.015)
{0.022}
(0.037)
2.1
85
Average
0.015
77
.0.25
54
0.30
0.46
0.38
17
0.73
1.5
0.32
^149
0.047
2.3
0.00
0.00
0.44
0.061
0.017
0.022
0.00
0.18
0.014
0.00
0.034
0.041
3.0
152
2378-
TCDD''
Toxic
Equiv.
Factor
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.001
o'.too
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.001
2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENCIES
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7 percent O2
M23-6-I
(0.014)
0.044
-
0.0096
0.0068
0.0061
0.00096
0.00055
0.068
0.0027
{0.0010}
{0.010}
{0.0014}
0.00068
{0.0020}
{0.0014}
0.00014
(0.00014)
0.000041
0.0029
0.071
M23-7-I
'{0.014}
0.24
0.060
0.11
0.085
0.017
0.00030
0.51
0.0078
{0.0039}
{0.042}
0.0078
0.0028
{0.0035}
{0.0014}
{0.00028}
(0.00021)
(0.000035)
0.018
0.53
M23-8-I
0.015
0.085
0.021
0.025
0.024
0.0039
0.00012
0.17
0.0037
{0.0015}
{0.019}
0.0044
0.0015
0,0022
(0.0015)
{0.0022}
(0.00015)
(0.000037)
0.012
0.29
Average
0.015
0,12
0.030
0.046
0.038
0.0073
0.00032
0.25
0.0047
0.00
0.00
0.0061
0.0017
0.0022
0.00
0.00014
0.00
0.000041
0.011
0.30
()
o
Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter adjusted to 7 percent oxygen at 20°C and 1 atm.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society. Pilot study on International Information
Exchange on Dioxins and Related Compounds: International Toxicity Equivalency Factor (I-TEF) Methods of Risk Assessment
for Complex Mixtures of Dioxins and Related Compounds. Report No. 176, August 1988.
Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are'not counted in totals or averages.
Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are not counted in totals or averages.
2-6
-------
TABLE 2.5
CDD/CDF EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Total Sampling Time, min.
Average Sampling Rate, dscfma
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Average Stack Gas Temp.,°F
O2 Concentration, % by Volume
CO2 Concentration, % by Volume
Moisture, % by Volume
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscftn3
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio %
M23-6-O
10/22/96
240
0.616
147.758
4.162
400
14.9
8.5
3.5
92,465
51,888
1,469
99.1
M23-7-0
10/23/96
240
0.658
158.021
4.451
401
14.2
9.6
3.3
93,134
51,890
1,469
102.7
M23-8-O
10/24/96
240
0.705
169.242
4.767
410
14.7
8.8
3.8
101,413
55,904
1,583
102.1
Average
0.660
158.341
4.460
404
14.6
9.0
3.6
95,671
53,228
1,507
101.3
a Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68 °F and 1 atm
n Dry standard cubic meters at 20 °C and 1 atm
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions
' Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20 °C and 1 atm
2-7
-------
TABLE 2.6
CDD/CDF STACK GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
CONGENER
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total CDD
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total CDF
Total CDD + CDF
CONCENTRATION1
ng/dscm, as measured
M23-6-O
(0.0048)
0.060
(0.010)
0.077
(0.0072)
(0.0070)
(0.0072)
0.060
0.0072
0.014
0.050
0.26
0.0012
0.0048
(0.0048)
(0.0048)
(0.0048)
(0.0048)
(0.0048)
0.0024
(0.0048)
0.0022
{0.0024}
(0.0048)
{0.0024}
{0.0072}
0.0072
0.27
M23-7-O
(0.0045)
1.5
(0.0090)
1.2
0.0067
0.0090
0.0090
0.76
0.052
0.079
0.049
3.6
(0.0022)
{0.00045}
(0.0045)
(0.0045)
(0.0045)
(0.0045)
(0.0045)
{0.0022}
(0.0045)
{0.0022}
0.0022
(0.0045)
0.0022
(0.0090)
0.0022
3.6
M23-8-O
(0.0021)
0.0094
(0.0063)
0.086
(0.0042)
0.0020
{0.0021}
0.044
(0.0063)
(0.013)
0.0084
0.23
(0.0042)
0.010
(0.0021)
(0.0021)
(0.0021)
(0.0021)
(0.0021)
0.0021
(0.00021)
{0.0042}
{0.0021}
(0.0042)
{0.0021}
0.0042
0.019
0.25
Average
0.00
0.56
0.00
0.46
0.0070
0.0060
0.0090
0.29
0.029
0.047
0.036
1.4
0.0012
0.0076
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0023
0.00
.0.0032
0.0022
0.00
0.0022
0.0042
0.0094
1.4
EMISSION RATE6
^g/hr
M23-6-O
(0.42)
5.3
(0.85)
6.8
(0.64)
(0.64)
(0.64)
5.3
0.64
1.3
4.5
23
0.11
0.42
(0.42)
(0.42)
(0.42)
(0.42)
(0.42)
0.21
(0.42)
0.21
{0.21}
(0.42)
{0.21}
{0.64}
0.64
24
M23-7-O
(0.40)
134
(0.79)
107
0.59
0.79
0.79
67
4.6
6.9
4.4
320
(0.20)
{0.040}
(0.40)
(0.40)
(0.40)
(0.40)
(0.40)
{0.20}
(0.40)
{0.20}
0.20
(0.40)
0.20
(0.79)
0.20
320
M23-8-0
(0.20)
9.0
(0.60)
8.2
(0.40)
0.20
{0.20}
4.2
(0.60)
1.2
0.80
22
(0.40)
1.0
(0.20)
(0.20)
(0.20)
(0.20)
(0.20)
0.20
(0.20)
0.40
{0.20}
(0.40)
{0.20}
0.40
1.8
24
Average
0.00
50
0.00
41
0.59
0.50
0.79
26
2.6
4.1
3.2
122
0.11
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.31
0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.88
123
Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm.
Micrograms per hour.
Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are not counted in totals or averages.
Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are not counted in totals or averages.
2-8
-------
TABLE 2.7
CDD/CDF STACK GAS CONCENTRATIONS AND 2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENT STACK
GAS CONCENTRATIONS ADJUSTED TO 7 PERCENT OXYGEN
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
APG COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
CONGENER
Dioxins
2378 TCDD
Total TCDD
12378 PeCDD
Total PeCDD
123478 HxCDD
123678 HxCDD
123789 HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
Total HpCDD
Octa CDD
Total CDD
Furans
2378 TCDF
Total TCDF
12378 PeCDF
23478 PeCDF
Total PeCDF
123478 HxCDF
123678 HxCDF
234678 HxCDF
123789 HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1234678 HpCDF
1234789 HpCDF
Total HpCDF
Octa CDF
Total CDF
Total CDD + CDF
CONCENTRATION"
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7 percent O2
M23-6-O
(0.011)
0.14
(0.022)
0.18
(0.017)
(0.017)
(0.017)
0.14
0.017
0.033
0.12
0.61
0.0028
0.011
(0.011)
(0.011)
(0.011)
(0.011)
(0.011)
0.0056
(0.011)
0.0056
{0.0056}
(0.011)
{0.0056}
{0.017}
0.017
0.62
M23-7-O
(0.0093)
3.2
(0.019)
2.5
0.014
0.019
0.019
1.6
0.11
0.16
0.10
7.5
(0.0047)
{0.00093}
(0.0093)
(0.0093)
(0.0093)
(0.0093)
(0.0093)
{0.0047}
(0.0093)
{0.0047}
0.0047
(0.0093)
0.0047
(0.019)
0.0047
7.5
M23-8-O
(0.0047)
0..21
(0.014)
0.19
(0.0094)
(0.0047)
{0.0047}
0.10
(0.014)
(0.028)
0.019
0.52
(0.0094)
0.024
(0.0047)
(0.0047)
(0.0047)
(0.0047)
(0.0047)
0.0047
(0.0047)
(0.0094
{0.0047}
(0.0094)
{0.0047}
{0.0094}
0.042
0.56
Average
0.00
1.2
0.00
1.0
0.014
0.012
0.012
0.61
0.037
0.056
0.079
2.9
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0065
0.0051
0.00
0.0050
0.013
0.021
2.9
2378-
TCDDb
Toxic
Equiv.
Factor
1.000
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.001
0.100
0.050
0.500
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.010
0.010
0.001
2378 TOXIC EQUIVALENCIES
ng/dscm, adjusted to 7 percent O2
M23-6-O
(0.011)
(0.011)
(0.0017)
(0.0017)
(0.0017)
0.00017
0.00012
0.00029
0.00028
(0.00056)
(0.0056)
(0.0011)
(0.0011)
0.00056
(0.0011)
{0.000056}
(0.00011)
{0.000017}
0.00084
M23-7-O
(0.0093)
(0.0093)
0.0014
0.0019
0.0019
0.0011
0.00010
0.0064
(0.00047)
(0.00047)
(0.0047)
(0.00093)
(0.00093)
0.00047
(0.00093)
0.000047
(0.000093)
(0.000019)
0.00052
M23-8-O
(0.047)
(0.0071)
(0.00094)
0.00047
{0.00047}
(0.00014)
0.000019
0.000489
(0.00094)
(0.00024)
(0.0024)
(0.00047)
(0.00047)
0.00047
(0.00047)
{0.000047}
(0.000094)
0.0000094
0.000479
Average
0.00
0.00
0.0014
0.0012
0.0012
0.00047
0.000061
0.00239
0.00028-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000051
0.00
0.000013
0.00061
a Nanogram per dry standard cubic meter adjusted to 7 percent oxygen at 20 °C and 1 atm.
b North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society. Pilot study on International Information
Exchange on Dioxins and Related Compounds: International Toxicity Equivalency Factor (I-TEF) Methods of Risk Assessment
for Complex Mixtures of Dioxins and Related Compounds. Report No. 176, August 1988.
()Non Detectable - Results are below target analyte detection limits. ND values are not counted in totals or averages.
{ }Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration. EMPC values are not counted in totals or averages.
2-9
-------
Table 2.7 also presents the adjusted concentrations in 2378 toxic equivalents. The
average TEF concentration for total CDD/CDF was 0.00061 ng/dscm @ 7% O2.
2.2.2 Particulate Matter/metals
During Run No. M29-13-I the filter media in the sample train ruptured. The sample
train was turned off immediately. Upon examination of the filter it was discovered that some
particulate matter had broken through the filter into the first empty impinger. Rather than void
this run, it was decided by the PES Project Manager and EPA WAM to keep the first impinger
catch separate from the other samples and then filter this solution through a tared quartz fiber
filter in order to recover the lost particulate matter. Due to the large mass of particulate matter
in the total sample, we do not believe that the particulate matter or metals results for this run
were compromised.
Also, when the filter ruptured, some acidic potassium permanganate solution backed
up into the empty impinger that separates the acidic hydrogen perioxide and acidic potassium
permanganate absorbing solutions. PES recovered this sample fraction separately and had
intended to analyze this fraction separately for mercury. However, PES did not instruct the
analytical laboratory to analyze this sample fraction separately. As a result, the sample
fraction was combined with the sample fractions for the metals other than mercury. This
resulted in high manganese results for this run. Therefore, the manganese results for this run
are not valid. All other metals results are valid.
At the conclusion of Run No. M29-13-O on the baghouse outlet the glass sample
nozzle dropped off the end of the probe and could not be recovered. Due to the low particulate
concentration at this location it is believed by PES that the loss of this small portion of the
sample did not compromise the particulate matter or metals results for this run.
Baghouse Inlet
Table 2.8 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling and stack gas
parameters at the baghouse inlet. The total sampling time for each test run was 240 minutes.
The average sample volume was 89.266 dscf or 2.528 dscm. The average stack gas
temperature was 503 °F and contained 10.3% CO2, 13.7% O2, and 4.2% moisture. The average
stack gas volumetric flow rate was 104,363 acfm or 51,395 dscfm or 1,455 dscm.
Table 2.9 summarizes the stack gas particulate matter concentrations and emission
rates at the baghouse inlet. The average concentration was 5.443 grains per dry standard cubic
foot (gr/dscf) or 12.45 grams per dry standard cubic meter (g/dscm). The concentrations are
also shown adjusted to 7% O2. The average mass emission rate was 2,394 pounds per hour
(Ib/hr) or 1,086 kilograms per hour (kg/hr).
Table 2.10 summarizes the stack gas metals concentrations and emission rates. All of
the target metals were found to be present in all three samples. Average concentrations ranged
2-10
-------
TABLE 2.8
PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE INLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Total Sampling Time, min.
Average Sampling Rate, dscfhV
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Average Stack Gas Temp., °F
O2 Concentration, % by Volume
CO2 Concentration, % by Volume
Moisture, % by Volume
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfma
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
M29-13-I
10/22/96
240
0.381
91.332
2.586
500
13.2
10.7
4.0
100,324
49,866
1,412
99.8
M29-14-I
10/23/96
240
0.356
85.519
2.422
503
13.9
10.3
4.2
102,889
50,439
1,428
101.5
M29-15-I
10/24/96
240
0.379
90.946
2.575
504
14.0
9.9
4.4
109,878
53,880
1,526
101.0
Average
0.372
89.266
2.528
503
13.7
10.3
4.2
104,363
51,395
1,455
100.8
a Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
e Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-11
-------
TABLE 2.9
PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE INLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr clock
Concentration:
gr/dscP
gr/dscf @7% O2b
g/dscmc
g/dscm@ 7% O2d
Emission Rate:
lb/hre
kg/hrf
M29-13-I
10/22/96
1130-1743
5.472
9.879
12.52
22.61
2,339
1,061
M29-14-I
10/23/96
1040-1540
5.802
11.52
13.28
26.37
2,508
1,138
M29-15-I
10/24/96
1054-1715
5.053
10.18
11.56
23.30
2,334
1,059
Average
5.443
10.53
12.45
24.09
2,394
1,086
' Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68 °F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
c Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
e Pounds per hour.
'Kilograms per hour.
2-12
-------
TABLE 2.10
STACK GAS METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE INLET
APG LIME COMPANY RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr Clock
Antimony (Sb)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Arsenic (As)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@ 7% O2b
g/hr*
Beryllium (Be)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hr'
Cadmium (Cd)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hr'-
Total Chromium (Cr)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@ 7% O2b
g/hr1
Cobalt (Co)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hi*
Lead (Pb)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hr*
Manganese (Mn)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hr*
Mercury (Hg)
/^g/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hr'
Nickel (Ni)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
gfbi*
Selenium (Se)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm @ 7% O2b
g/hr°
' M29-13-I
10/22/96
1130-1743
5.84
10.5
0.495
26.9
48.6
2.28
24.2
43.8
2.05
0.746
1.35
0.0632
68.1
123
5.77
32.2
58.2
2.73
38.0
68.7
3.22
-
-
0.456
0.824
0.0387
53.4
96.3
4.52
40.2
72.6
3.41
M29-14-I
10/23/96
1040-1540
4.79
9.51
0.410
52.9
105
4.53
14.4
28.5
1.23
2.62
5.21
0.225
82.2
163
7.04
46.7
92.7
4.00
84.2
167
7.22
240
477
20.6
0.681
1.35
0.0584
73.5
146
6.30
28.3
56.3
2.43
M29-15-I
10/24/96
1054-1715
4.81
9.70
0.441
70.3
142
6.43
18.9
38.0
1.73
2.40
4.83
0.220
89.7
181
8.21
48.9
98.6
4.48
83.1
167
7.61
190
383
17.4
1.05
2.12
0.0963
72.2
145
6.61
39.6
79.8
3.63
Average
5.15
9.92
0.449
50.0
98.4
4.41
19.2
36.8
1.67
1.92
3.80
0.169
80.0
156
7.01
42.6
83.1
3.74
68.5
134
60.2
215
430
19.0
0.730
1.43
0.0645
66.4
129
5.81
36.0
69.5
3.15
Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20 C and 1 atm.
b Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter @ 20°C and 1 atm, adjusted to 7% O2.
c Grams per hour.
2-13
-------
from 0.730 micrograms per dry standard cubic meter (ng/dscm) for mercury to 215 |ig/dscm
for manganese.
Baghouse Outlet
Table 2.11 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling and stack gas
parameters. The total sampling time for each test run was 240 minutes. The average sample
volume was 162.167 dscf or 4.592 dscm. The average stack gas temperature was 410°F and
contained 9.0% CO2, 14.6% O2, and 3.6% moisture. The average stack gas volumetric flow
rate was 97,499 acfrn or 53,822 dscfm or 1,524 dscmm.
Table 2.12 summarizes the stack gas particulate matter concentrations and emission rates.
The average concentration was 1.42 E-02 gr/dscf or 3.26 E-02 g/dscm. The concentrations are
also shown adjusted to 7% O2. The average emission rate was 6.54 Ib/hr or 2.96 kg/hr.
Table 2.13 summarizes the stack gas metals concentrations and emission rates. All of the
target metals were found to be present in all three samples. Average concentrations ranged
from 0.206 ug/dscm for cadmium to 37.5 ug/dscm for manganese.
2.2.3 Total Hydrocarbons
Total hydrocarbons (THC) were measured using a flame ionization analyzer (FIA)
calibrated with propane-in-air gases. Two FIAs were used, one for the Kiln No. 1 baghouse
inlet and one for the baghouse outlet. The FIAs were operated on a 0-100 parts per million by
volume (ppmv) range. The instrument sensitivity was ±2% of span or 2 ppmv. The sample
lines, pump, and detector were heated; therefore the THC concentrations were measured on a
wet basis. The measured moisture contents in each stack were used to correct the measured
concentrations on a wet basis to concentrations on a dry basis. The average moistures
obtained for each run from the Method 23 and Method 29 moisture determinations were used.
Kiln No. 1
Table 2.14 summarizes the THC emissions from Kiln No. 1. In all cases the THC
concentrations were very low, near the instrument detection of 2 ppmv. At the baghouse inlet
the average THC concentration was 2.5 ppmv, dry basis, or 4.9 ppmv adjusted to 7% O2. The
average emission rate was 0.91 Ib/hr. At the baghouse outlet the average THC concentration
was 2.2 ppmv or 4.8 ppmv adjusted to 7% 02. The average emission rate was 0.80 Ib/hr.
2.3 KILN NO. 2 COOLER EXHAUST
Table 2.15 summarizes the particulate matter/metals emissions sampling and stack gas
parameters. The total sampling time for each test run was 120 minutes. The average sample
volume was 76.750 dscf or 2.173 dscm. The average stack gas temperature was 211 °F and
contained 1.1% moisture. The stack gas was assumed to be comprised of 20.9% O2 and no
2-14
-------
TABLE 2.11
PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
APG LIME COMPANY RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Total Sampling Time, min.
Average Sampling Rate, dscfrn3
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Average Stack Gas Temp., °F
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Volumetric Flow Rate:
acfmd
dscfm3
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
M29-13-0
10/22/96
240
0.651
156.196
4.423
411
14.9
8.5
3.6
96,040
53,162
1,505
98.3
M29-14-O
10/23/96
240
0.667
160.166
4.535
406
14.2
9.6
3.5
95,852
53,039
1,502
105.1
M29-15-0
10/24/96
240
0.709
170.140
4.818
413
14.7
8.8
3.8
100,603
55,265
1,565
107.2
Average
0.676
162.167
4.592
410
14.6
9.0
3.6
97,499
53,822
1,524
103.5
" Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
r Dry standard cubic meters at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
' Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-15
-------
TABLE 2.12
PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO. 1 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr clock
Concentration:
gr/dscf
gr/dscf@7% O2b
g/dscmc
g/dscm@7% O2d
Emission Rate:
lb/hre
kg/hrf
M29-13-O
10/22/96
1130-1749
0.0142
0.0330
0.0326
0.0754
6.48
2.94
M29-14-O
10/23/96
1041-1542
0.0184
0.0381
0.0420
0.0871
8.34
3.79
M29-15-O
10/24/96
1121-1731
0.0101
0.0226
0.0231
0.0518
4.78
2.17
Average
0.0142
0.0312
0.0326
0.0715
6.54
2.96
" Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68 °F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68° F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
* Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
' Pounds per hour.
f Kilograms per hour.
2-16
-------
TABLE 2.13
STACK GAS METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO.l BAGHOUSE OUTLET
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr Clock
Antimony (Sb)
Mg/dscm"
Mg/dscm@ 7% O2b
g/hr=
Arsenic (As)
Mg/dscma
Mg/dscm@ 7% 02b
g/hi6
Beryllium (Be)
Mg/dscm"
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hi*
Cadmium (Cd)
Mg/dscma
^g/dscm @ 7 % O2b
g/hi"
Total Chromium (Cr)
,ug/dscma
Mg/dscm@ 7% O2b
g/hr"
Cobalt (Co)
//g/dscm"
Mg/dscm @ 7 % O2b
g/lu-
Lead (Pb)
//g/dscma
Mg/dscm@ 7% O2b
g/hr=
Manganese (Mn)
//g/dscma
Mg/dscm @ 7 % O2b
g/hr*
Mercury (Hg)
/^g/dscma
Aig/dscm@ 7% 02b
g/hr<
Nickel (Ni)
^g/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/nr*
Selenium (Se)
//g/dscma
Mg/dscm@7% O2b
g/hr1
M29-13-O
10/22/96
1130-1749
1.42
3.29
0.128
0.439
1.02
0.0396
0.301
0.697
0.0272
0.289
0.670
0.0261
4.39
10.2
0.396
1.26
2.92
0.114
3.12
7.23
0.282
62.4
145
5.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
6.49
0.253
3.48
8.07
0.314
M29-14-O
10/23/96
1041-1542
1.31
2.72
0.118
0.547
1.13
0.0493
0.265
0.549
0.0238
0.195
0.405
0.0176
4.45
9.24
0.401
1.28
2.65
0.115
2.36
4.89
0.213
6.81
14.1
0.614
0.260
0.540
0.0234
2.76
5.72
0.248
3.20
6.63
0.288
M29-15-O
10/24/96
1121-1731
1.14
2.55
0.107
0.565
1.27
0.0530
0.190
0.426
0.0179
0.133
0.298
0.0125
3.69
8.28
0.347
0.890
2.00
0.0836
1.98
4.43
0.186
43.2
96.8
4.05
0.820
1.84
0.0770
2.86
6.42
0.269
4.73
10.6
0.444
Average
1.29
2.86
0.118
0.517
1.14
0.0473
0.252
0.557
0.230
0.206
0.458
0.0187
4.18
9.23
0.381
1.14
2.52
0.104
2.49
5.52
0.227
37.5
85.2
3.43
0.360
0.793
0.0335
2.81
6.21
0.257
36.80
8.44
0.349
• Micrograms per dry standard
b Micrograms per dry standard
0 Grams per hour.
cubic meter @ 20 C and 1 arm.
cubic meter @ 20°C and 1 atm, adjusted to
7% O2.
2-17
-------
TABLE 2.14
SUMMARY OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS KILN NO. 1
APG LIME COMPANY RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Baghouse Inlet
Flow Rate, dscfin a-b
Oxygen, %
THC Concentration
ppmvdc
ppmvd@7% O2d
THC Emission Rate
lb/hrc
Baghouse Outlet
Flow Rate, dscfin a'b
Oxygen, %
THC Concentration
ppmvdc
ppmvd@ 7% O2d
THC Emission Rate
lb/hre
M25A-4
10-22-96
50,721
13.2
2.3
4.2
0.82
52,525
14.9
1.8
4.2
0.65
M25A-5
10-23-96
52,404
13.9
3.2
6.3
1.14
52,465
14.2
2.9
5.9
1.03
M25A-6
10-24-96
54,875
14.0
2.1
4.1
0.78
55,585
14.7
1.9
4.3
0.73
Average
52,667
13.7
2.5
4.9
0.91
53,525
14.6
2.2
4.8
0.80
a Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68°F and 1 arm.
b Average of Method 23 and Method 29 results.
0 Parts per million by volume, as propane, dry basis.
d Parts per million by volume, as propane, dry basis, adjusted to 7% oxygen.
e Pounds per hour.
2-18
-------
TABLE 2.15
PARTICULATE/METALS EMISSIONS SAMPLING AND STACK GAS PARAMETERS
KILN NO. 2 COOLER EXHAUST STACK
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Total Sampling Time, min.
Average Sampling Rate, dscftn"
Sample Volume:
dscf
dscmc
Average Stack Gas Temp., °F
O2 Concentration, % by volume
CO2 Concentration, % by volume
Moisture, % by volume
Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate:
acftnd
dscftn3
dscmme
Isokinetic Sampling Ratio, %
M29-10
10/21/96
120
0.653
78.328
2.218
201
20.9
0
1.0
7,862
5,887
167
100.6
M29-11
10/21/96
120
0.625
74.946
2.122
226
20.9
0
1.4
7,767
5,571
158
101.7
M29-12
10/21/96
120
0.641
76.976
2.180
207
20.9
0
0.9
7,653
5,677
161
102.5
Average
0.640
76.750
2.173
211
20.9
0
1.1
7,760
5,711
162
101.6
" Dry standard cubic feet per minute at 68 °F and 1 atm.
b Dry standard cubic feet at 68°F and 1 atm.
c Dry standard cubic meters at 20 °C and 1 atm.
d Actual cubic feet per minute at stack conditions.
" Dry standard cubic meters per minute at 20°C and 1 atm.
2-19
-------
CO2. The average stack gas volumetric flow rate was 7,760 acfin or 5,711 dscfrn or 162
dscmm
Table 2.16 summarizes the stack gas particulate matter concentrations and emission
rates. The average concentration was 1.27 E-01 gr/dscf or 2.92 E-02 g/dscm. The
concentrations are also shown adjusted to 7% O2. The average emission rate was 6.26 Ib/hr or
2.84 kg/hr.
Table 2.17 summarizes the stack gas metals concentrations and emission rates. All of
the target metals except beryllium and mercury were found to be present in all three samples.
Average concentrations of those metals detected ranged from 0.763 (ig/dscm for cadmium to
135 ug/dscm for manganese.
2-20
-------
TABLE 2.16
PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO. 2 COOLER EXHAUST STACK
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr Clock
Concentration:
gr/dscf
g/dscm
Emission Rate:
lb/hre
kg/hrf
M29-10
10/21/96
1125-1334
0.145
0.332
7.33
3.33
M29-11
10/21/96
1404-1607
0.0978
0.224
4.67
2.12
M29-12
10/21/96
1625-1828
0.139
0.319
6.78
3.07
Average
0.127
0.292
6.26
2.84
a Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68 °F and 1 atm.
b Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68 °F and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
c Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20°C and 1 atm.
d Grams per dry standard cubic meter at 20 °C and 1 atm adjusted to 7 percent O2.
e Pounds per hour.
f Kilograms per hour.
2-21
-------
TABLE 2.17
STACK GAS METALS CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES
KILN NO.2 COOLER EXHAUST STACK
APG LIME COMPANY - RIPPLEMEAD, VA
Run No.
Date
Clock Time, 24-hr Clock
Antimony (Sb)
//g/dscrna
g/hi*
Arsenic (As)
Mg/dscma
g/hrc
Beryllium (Be)
,ug/dscma
g/hrc
Cadmium (Cd)
/^g/dscma
g/hrc
Total Chromium (Cr)
Aig/dscma
g/hrc
Cobalt (Co)
//g/dscma
g/hi*
Lead (Pb)
^g/dscma
g/hrc
Manganese (Mn)
/ug/dscma
g/hr0
Mercury (Hg)
/ug/dscma
g/hrc
Nickel (Ni)
yug/dscma
g/hr<
Selenium (Se)
Aig/dscma
g/hi*
M29-10
10/21/96
1125-1334
4.13
0.0413
0.947
0.00947
0.00
0.00
0.414
0.00414
9.96
0.0997
5.18
0.0519
120
1.20
19.3
0.193
0.00
0.00
6.00
0.0600
2.86
0.0286
M29-11
10/21/96
1404-1607
4.01
0.0379
0.565
0.00535
0.00
0.00
1.33
0.0126
10.0
0.0950
5.51
0.0522
84.3
0.798
28.4
0.269
0.00
0.00
6.03
0.0571
3.38
0.0320
M29-12
10/21/96
1625-1828
4.59
0.0442
0.798
0.00770
0.00
0.00
0.541
0.00522
8.90
0.0858
6.10
0.0588
200
1.93
63.3
0.611
0.00
0.00
4.77
0.0460
2.57
0.0248
Average
4.24
0.0412
0.770
0.00751
0.00
0.00
0.763
0.00733
9.63
0.0935
5.60
0.0543
135
1.31
37.0
0.357
0.00
0.00
5.60
0.0544
2.94
0.0285
Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter
b Micrograms per dry standard cubic meter
c Grams per hour.
@ 20° C and 1 atm.
@ 20° C and 1 atm, adju$ted to 7%
O,.
2-22
-------
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The APG Lime Company is located in Ripplemead, Virginia. The facility has three
coal-fired rotary kilns. The emissions from each kiln are controlled by a fabric filter
baghouse. In addition, each kiln has a cooler exhaust stack that is presently uncontrolled.
During this testing program, Research Triangle Institute (RTI), under contract to
ESD/MICG, was responsible for monitoring and documenting all process and emission control
system operational parameters. RTI was also responsible for development of a detailed
narrative for this section of the final report. At the present time this information is being
handled as confidential business information (CBI) and is not included in this draft report.
3-1
-------
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
4.1 NO. 1 KILN
4.1.1 Baghouse Inlet
The inlet measurement site was located in a 71.25-inch inside diameter (ID) round,
horizontal duct 564 inches (7.9 equivalent duct diameters) downstream of the nearest flow
disturbance (T-duct) and 108 inches (1.5 equivalent duct diameters) upstream of the nearest
flow disturbance (90° elbow). According to EPA Method 1 criteria this site required a
minimum of 20 sample traverse points, 10 along each of two perpendicular diameters. PES
elected to use 24 sample traverse points, 12 along each diameter. Figure 4.1 shows a
simplified schematic of the baghouse inlet measurement site and sample traverse point
locations. Access to the site will be via scaffold provided by an outside contractor.
4.1.2 Baghouse Outlet
The baghouse outlet sampling location was located in a 72.25-inch ID round vertical
stack 390 inches (5.4 equivalent stack diameters) downstream of the flow disturbance (Y-
intersection) and 390 inches (5.4 equilvent stack diameters) upstream of the stack exit.
According to EPA Method 1, this location required 20 sample traverse points, 10 along each
of two perpendicular diameters. Sampling was be conducted through four existing sample
ports located at 90"°. Figure 4.2 shows a simplified schematic of the outlet measurement site
and sample traverse point locations. The site had a 360° permanent testing platform and was
. accessible via a caged ladder.
4.2 NO. 2 KILN COOLER STACK
The measurement site for the kiln No. 2 cooler stack was located in a 71.25-inch ID
round vertical stack 372 inches (5.2 equivalent stack diameters) downstream of the nearest
flow disturbance (45° elbow) and 192 inches (2.7 equivalent stack diameters) upstream of the
stack exit. According to EPA Method 1 criteria, this measurement site required 20 sample
traverse points, 10 along each of two perpendicular diameters. PES elected to use 24 traverse
points, 12 along each diameter. The measurement site was accessible from ground level via a
walkway alongside the coal conveyor. Sampling was conducted indoors just above floor level.
Figure 4.3 shows a simplified schematic of the cooler measurement site and sample traverse
point locations.
4-1
-------
From
Kiln '
Flow
-47.
Baghouse
SAMPLE TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fraction of
Stack ID
.026
.082
.146
.226
.342
.658
.774
.854
.918
.974
Distance
Inches
1.9
5.9
10.5
16.3
24.6
47.4
55.7
61.5
66.1
70.1
72" ID
Cross-Section
Figure 4.1 APG Lime Kiln Baghouse Inlet Sampling Location.
-------
Platform
B
7225" ID
F "*-n-^ 4 4-inch ID Ports 6" deep
Cross Section
SAMPLE TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS
Point Fraction of Distance Port Depth Port Location
Number Stack ID Inches Inches Inches
1
2
3
4
5
.026
.082
.146
.226
.342
1.88
5.94
10.56
16.31
24.69
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
7.88
11.94
16.56
22.31
30.69
From
Fan
Ground
M
Figure 4.2 APG Lime Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Outlet Sampling Location.
4-3
-------
Floor
/
o
k^
1
1
~l
— 1
V
/~
(
\y
Y
n
Cross
^x —
oT
y\
*£- \4'
Section
7125" ID
ID Nipples
3.25" Deep
SAMPLE TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS
Point
Number
PJ
l^
(*•
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Fraction of
Stack ID
.021
.067
.118
.177
.250
.356
.644
.750
.823
.882
.933
.979
Distance
Inches
1.50
4.75
8.44
12.63
17.81
25.38
45.88
53.44
58.63
62.81
66.50
69.75
Port Depth Port Location
Inches
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
Inches
4.75
8.00
11.69
15.88
21.06
28.63
49.13
56.69
61.88
66.06
69.75
73.00
Damper
Figure 4.3 APG Lime Kiln No. 2 Cooler Stack Sampling Location.
4-4
-------
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Table 5.1 summarizes the sources, test parameters, test methods, number of tests, and
planned duration of each event. Sampling of the baghouse inlet and outlet was conducted
simultaneously for CDD/CDF, THC, and PM/Metals. Brief descriptions of each method
follow:
5.1 LOCATION OF MEASUREMENT SITES AND SAMPLE/VELOCITY
TRAVERSE POINTS
EPA Method 1, "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources," will be used
to select the measurement sites and to establish velocity and sample traverse point locations.
The measurement sites are discussed in Section 4.0.
5.2 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
EPA Method 2, "Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate
(Type S Pitot Tube)," was used to determine stack gas volumetric flow rate at the baghouse
inlet and outlet and cooler stack. A Type S pitot tube, constructed according to Method 2
criteria and having an assigned coefficient of 0.84 and connected to an inclined-vertical
manometer was used to measure velocity pressure. On the cooler stack the velocity pressure
was found to be too low to measure with a conventional manometer. Therefore, PES used a
digital reading micro manometer with a range of 0 to 0.1 inch of water and 0.001 inch
resolution. A calibrated Type K thermocouple attached directly to the pitot tube was used to
measure stack gas temperature. The average stack gas velocity was calculated from the
average square roots of the velocity pressure, average stack gas temperature, stack gas
molecular weight, and absolute stack pressure. The volumetric flow rate is the product of
velocity and the stack cross-sectional area.
5.3 DETERMINATION OF DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND EMISSION
CORRECTION FACTORS
EPA Method 3B, "Gas Analysis for the Determination of Emission Rate Correction
Factor or Excess Air," was used to measure carbon dioxide and oxygen content of the stack
gases. Gas samples were extracted from each stack using the integrated, single-point bag
sampling technique. The bag contents were analyzed onsite within 6 hours after sample
5-1
-------
collection using an Orsat® analyzer to determine percent concentrations of carbon dioxide and
oxygen. The Orsat analyzer had 0.1 percent subdivisions.
5.4 DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS MOISTURE CONTENT
EPA Method 4, "Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases," was to determine
stack gas moisture content. The quantity of condensed water was determined gravimetrically
and then compared to the total volume of gas sampled to determine the volume percent
moisture content. The Method 4 procedure was conducted simultaneously with the Method 23
and Method 29 pollutant measurement runs.
5.5 DETERMINATION OF POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS AND
POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURANS
EPA Method 23, "Determination of Poly chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans From Stationary Sources" was used to determine
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (CDD's) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (CDF's) at the
baghouse inlet and outlet. A schematic of the Method 23 sampling apparatus used at the
baghouse outlet is shown in Figure 5.1. A schematic of the Method 23 sampling apparatus
used at the baghouse inlet is shown in Figure 5.1 A. At the inlet an unheated Teflon®
connector was used between the filter and condenser. The connector was cleaned in the same
manner as the condenser during sample recovery. Samples were withdrawn from the gas
streams isokinetically and collected in the sample probe, on a glass fiber filter, and on a
packed column of XAD-2 adsorbent material. Each measurement run was 240 minutes in
duration. The CDD's and CDF's were extracted from the samples, separated by high
resolution gas chromatography, and measured by high resolution mass spectrometry. PES
selected Triangle Laboratories, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina to prepare the
filters and adsorbent traps, and perform the required analyses.
5.6 DETERMINATION OF TOTAL HYDROCARBONS
EPA Method 25 A, "Determination of Total Gaseous Organic Concentrations Using a
Flame lonization Analyzer" was used to measure total hydrocarbon (THC) concentrations at
the baghouse inlet and outlet. Two flame ionization analyzers (FIAs) were used, one for the
inlet and one for the outlet. Heated sample lines and FIAs were used. THC concentrations
were expected to be less than 25 parts per million by volume (ppmv) as propane. Therefore,
PES operated both FIAs on a 0-50 ppmv range. Span gases consisting of propane-in-air,
prepared according to EPA Protocol, were used.
Figure 5.2 is a schematic of the FIA sampling system. The two FIAs were equipped
with a strip chart recorder and a data logger. Prior to beginning the testing program, the two
FIA systems were assembled and a bias check and a response time test were conducted.
5-2
-------
UJ
Temperature
Sensor
Button Hook
Nozzle
Stack
Wall
Filter Holder
Condenser XAD
Trap
Temperature
Sensor
Heated Glass
Liner
Gas
Flow
' Jl
TypeS vl
Pilot Tube N
Heated Area
Inclined
Manometer
Gas
Exit
Orifice
L
Inclined
Manometer
Temperature
Sensor
Recirculation
Pump
Temperature
_ Sensors ^
Vacuum
Line
Dry Gas
I M-t—m
1 1
\
1
»
Empty 100 ml HPLC Water Empty Silica Gel
Vacuum
Gauge
J
Vacuum
Pump
Figure 5.1 Method 23 CDD/CDF Outlet Sampling Train.
-------
Temperature
Sensor
Stack
Wall
Filter Holder
Button Hook
Nozzle A Heated Glass
A 4 Liner
U I
I V. -,1,.,-fefa
Gas
Flow
TypeS
Pilot Tube
Inclined
Manometer
Gas
Exit
:lmed
Incln
Manometer
Unheated
Teflon
Connector
Condenser "XAD
Trap
Temperature
Sensor
Temperature
Sensor
Recirculation
Pump
Temperature
_ Sensors^
Orifice f
lit I
H
I i
SM..
I
i i
1 f Dry Gas \
t \i-f~, i
HI
\#
Empty 100 ml HPLC Water Empty Silica Gel
Vacuum
Gauge
J
Vacuum
Pump
Figure 5.1 A Method 23 CDD/CDF Inlet Sampling Train.
-------
SS Probe
Sample/Callbntioa
Valve
Stock
Teflotf Simple Une
Figure 5.2 Method 25A Measurement System for THC.
lOOcc/rnfn
Rile Meier
— 1
T
Heated FIA
With Integral
Pump
Ll
Date
Logger
Chart
I
Recorder
-------
Acceptability criteria for the bias check is a difference of not more than five percent between
the value measured by direct injection of calibration gas at the analyzer and the value obtained
by injection of the calibration gas at the calibration gas valve. (Details of the bias check are
presented in EPA Method 6C). Prior to testing, PES performed the bias checks, response time
tests, and calibration error tests. Calibration drift checks were performed periodically and at
the conclusion of each measurement run.
5.7 DETERMINATION OF PARTICIPATE MATTER AND METALS
EPA Method 29, "Determination of Metals Emissions From Stationary Sources," was
used to determine filterable particulate matter and metals at the baghouse inlet and outlet, and
at the cooler stack. The target metals included: Antimony (Sb), Arsenic (As), Beryllium (Be),
Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Mercury (Hg),
Nickel (Ni), and Selenium (Se). Samples were withdrawn from the gas streams isokinetically
and collected in the sample probe, on a tared quartz-fiber filter and in a series of impingers
containing acidic hydrogen peroxide solution followed by acidified potassium permanganate.
The probe and filter fractions were analyzed gravimetrically in the PES laboratory to
determine filterable particulate matter. Upon completion of the particulate matter analyses, the
particulate fractions and aqueous fractions were submitted to the laboratory for metals
analyses. PES has also selected Triangle Laboratories, Inc. to perform the metals analyses.
A schematic of baghouse outlet and cooler Method 29 sampling train is shown in
Figure 5.3. A schematic of the baghouse inlet Method 29 sampling train is shown in Figure
5.3A. At the inlet location it was necessary to use an unheated Teflon® connector between the
filter and first impinger. The sample recovery scheme for metals is shown in Figure 5.4. The
sample recovery scheme for the additional Hg fraction is shown in Figure 5.5. The sample
preparation and analysis scheme is shown in Figure 5.6. Metals other than Hg were analyzed
by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS) or inductively coupled argon
plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy. Hg was analyzed by cold vapor atomic absorption
spectroscopy (CVAAS).
5.8 PULVERIZED COAL FEED
Pulverized coal feed samples were collected by APG plant personnel during each air
pollutant measurement run on the kiln No. 1 baghouse. Grab samples were collected at the
beginning, middle and end of each measurement run. The grab samples were composited into
a single sample for each run. The samples were submitted to Galbraith Laboratories, Inc. for
proximate and ultimate analysis, including a gross calorific value.
5-6
-------
Glass Probe
Tip
Temperature
Sensor
J-
Glass Probe
Temperature
Sensor
Vacuum
Line
Figure 5.3 Method 29 Particulate Matter/Metals Baghouse Outlet and Cooler Sampling Train.
-------
oo
Glass Probe
Tip
Temperature
Sensor
Manometer
Temperature
Sensor
Unheated
Teflon
Connector
Empty 5%HNq/
(Optional) lo%H,Sq
Vacuum
Line
IO%HJSO4
Orifice
•1 . I . C
Figure 5.3A Method 29 Particulate Matter/Metals Inlet Sampling Train.
-------
MX Liner
and Nozzle
Rtewfth
acetone
Front Hal of
fitter Housing
norretafctnch
frushbcr
wthnorreUBc
brush & rise
will acetone
Chal finer to see
fparticuBte
ropuwd, if not.
repeat step above
Bnse three
UneswU
awno]
|
F
acetone
Rkeet
tree
tines wth
OUtKn
1 AD
(5* ra
Ffter
QrefuDy
rewe filer
fronibUKJoH
wthTefta-
coatedtveeztrs
andpbceh
petridsn
fctbpUjer
andBactHtf
ofFtertxang
toe tine
ttewitli
O.MM03
hpinpjers
begrang
of let)
I
Unit
Brush loose
pBrtlcaate
onto (to
SealpetrtdBh
wthtapa
contents
Erptfthe
contents into
Item
*»w
contents
dnsetfra
ttewlh
O.MH03
Empty the
contents Into
container
As three
ttewtt
1WHO3
(t)
BH
W
* Nuiter inparentheses Wales artarer ruiter
Figure 5.4 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fractions 1-4).
5-9
-------
4th Impinger
(Empty) & 5th
and 6th tanpingers
(Acidified KMn04)
Measure
impinger
contents
1
Empty the Empty the
ktpingerNo.4 itplngers
contents into Nos.5&6
container contents Into
Rinse
contz
with Rinse t
liner
.hree
100 ml times with
0.1NHN03 permanganate
reagent, then
with
Ftemov
water
eany
residue with
ZSmlBN
HCIs
0.1NHN03 KMn04
(5A) (SB)
o hit ion
I
8NHCI
(5C)
Last rnpinger
Weigh for
moist ire
Discard
Figure 5.5 Method 29 Sample Recovery Scheme (Sample Fraction 5).
5-10
-------
IdsM a
Figure 5.6 Method 29 Sample Preparation and Analysis Scheme.
-------
5.9 PULVERIZED COAL FEED RATE
The pulverized coal feed rate was determined using an oxygen-based F-factor
approach. This approach is based on a stoichiometric relationship between the heat input rate,
stack gas flow rate, F-factor, and oxygen content of the stack gas. The coal usage rate was
calculated by dividing the heat input rate by the "as-fired" gross calorific value of the coal.
The following equation was used:
_ g^ (20.9-0,) 60
FR FJ 20.9 GCV
d
where: CFR = Pulverized coal feedrate, Ib/hr, as-fired
QSTD = Stack gas flow rate, dscfm
Fd = Calculated F-factor, dscfm/mmBtu
O2 = Oxygen content of the stack gas, %
60 = Conversion, minutes to hour
GCV = Gross calorific value (Bru/lb) of the fuel combusted on an
as-fired basis
The limestone feed has no Btu value; therefore its contribution to the total heat input was
ignored.
5.10 VISIBLE EMISSIONS
EPA Method 9, "Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary
Sources" was used to read visible emissions from the Kiln No. 2 baghouse outlet stack.
PES provided a certified visible emissions evaluator (Certificate No. 255264, issued
September 26, 1996).
5-12
-------
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
This section describes the specific QA/QC procedures employed by PES in
performing this series of tests. The procedures contained in the "Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume HI, Stationary Source Specific
Methods," EPA-600/77-027B, and in the reference test methods served as the basis for
performance for all testing and related work activities in this project.
6.1 CALIBRATION OF APPARATUS
The preparation and calibration of source sampling equipment is essential in
maintaining data quality. Brief descriptions of the calibration procedures used by PES
follow.
6.1.1 Barometers
PES used aneroid barometers which are calibrated against a station pressure value
reported by a nearby National Weather Service Station corrected for elevation.
6.1.2 Temperature Sensors
Bimetallic dial thermometers and Type K thermocouples were calibrated using the
procedure described in Section 3.4.2 of the Quality Assurance Handbook. Each
temperature sensor was calibrated over the expected range of use against an ASTM 3C or
3F thermometer. Table 6.1 summarizes the type of calibrations performed, the acceptable
levels of variance, and the results. Digital thermometers were calibrated using a
thermocouple simulator having a range of 0-2400°F.
6.1.3 Pilot Tubes
PES used Type S pilot tubes which are constructed to EPA Method 2 specifications.
Pitot tubes meeting these specifications are assigned to a baseline coefficient to 0.84 and
need not be calibrated. The dimensional criteria and results for each pitot tube used are
summarized in Table 6.2.
6-1
-------
TABLE 6.1
SUMMARY OF TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION DATA
Temp.
Sensor
I.D.
1C
IE
RT3
4C
5C
SH-1
SH-2
SH-3
Usage
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Stack Gas
Impinger
Outlet
Impinger
Outlet
Impinger
Outlet
Temperature
Reference
34
88
215
325
34
84
209
321
31
204
380
71
33
209
383
36
82
199
284
64
34
63
33
64
34
, °F
Sensor
37
89
214
322
37
87
208
331
33
204
380
70
34
208
386
38
83
198
280
64
34
63
33
66
34
Temp.
- Difference
%
-0.6
-0.2
-0.1
-0.4
-0.6
-0.6
-0.2
-1.3
-0.2
0
0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.4
-0.4
-0.2
0.2
0.5
0.0*
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
EPA
Criteria
%
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<+1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<+1.5
<±1.5
<+1.5
<±1.5
<+1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<+1.5
<±1.5
<±1.5
<+1.5
6-2
-------
TABLE 6.2
SUMMARY OF PITOT TUBE DIMENSIONAL DATA
Measurement
«1
«2
PI
P2
Y
0
A
Z
W
D,
A/2Dt
Criteria
<10°
<10°
<5°
<5°
-
-
-
s 0.125 in.
^ 0.03125 in.
0.1875" s Dt
s 0.375"
1.05Dt^ A^
1.50Dt
Acceptable
Assigned Coefficient
RESULTS
Pilot Tube Identification
RIP 19
5
5
0
0
1
1
0.939
0.016
0.016
0.376
1.25
Yes
0.84
5C
1
1
0
0
1
0
1.004
0.018
0.0
0.375
1.34
• Yes
0.84
7C
0
0
3
3
2
1
0.974
0.034
0.017
0.371
1.31
Yes
0.84
7E
0
0
0
0
2
0
0.997
0.035
0.0
0.376
1.33
Yes
0.84
4C
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.973
0.0
0.017
0.375
1.30
Yes
0.84
RT3
0.5
0.5
1
0
0
0
0.929
0.0
0.0
0.375
1.24
Yes
0.84
6-3
-------
6.1.4 Differential Pressure Gauges
PES uses Dwyer inclined/vertical manometers to measure differential pressures.
These include velocity pressure, static pressure, and meter orifice pressure. Manometers
are selected with sufficient sensitivity to accurately measure pressures over the entire range
of expected values. Manometers are primary standards and require no calibration.
6.1.5 Method 5 Dry Gas Meter and Orifice
The Method 23 and 29 dry gas meters and orifices were calibrated hi accordance with
Section 3.3.2 of the Quality Assurance Handbook. This procedure involves direct
comparison of the dry gas meter to a reference dry test meter. The reference dry test meter
is routinely calibrated using a wet test meter or a liquid displacement technique. Before its
initial use in the field, the metering system was calibrated over the entire range of operation.
After field use, the metering system was calibrated at a single intermediate setting based on
the previous field test. Acceptable tolerances for the initial and final dry gas meter factors
and orifice calibration factors are + 0.05 and ±0.20 from average, respectively. The
results for the gas meter and orifice used hi this test program are summarized in Table 6.3.
6.2 ON-SITE MEASUREMENTS
The on-site QA/QC activities include:
6.2.1 Measurement Sites
Prior to sampling, the stack was checked dimensionally to determine measurement site
locations, location of velocity and sample test ports, inside stack dimensions, and sample
traverse point locations. Inside stack dimensions were checked through both test ports to
ensure uniformity of the stack inside diameter: The inside stack dimensions, wall thickness,
and sample port depths were measured to the nearest 0.1 inch.
6.2.2 Velocity Measurements
All velocity measurement apparatus were assembled, leveled, zeroed, and leak-checked
prior to use and at the end of each determination. The static pressure was determined at a
single point near the center of the stack cross-section.
6.2.3 Flue Gas Sampling
Integrated flue gas samples were collected in Tedlar* gas bags from the kiln exhaust
and scrubber outlets. Prior to use the bags were leak checked and purged with nitrogen to
ensure cleanliness. Prior to and after completion of each sampling run the entire sampling
system was leak checked from the tip of the probe.
6-4
-------
TABLE 6.3
SUMMARY OF DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE CALIBRATION DATA
Meter
No.
MB-13
MB-14
M5-6
M5-7
M5-9
Gamma
Pre-test
0.985
1.003
0.990
0.978
1.009
Post-test
0.976
1.008
0.999
0.982
1.023
% Diff.
0.91
-0.50
-0.90
-0.41
-1.39
EPA Criteria
±5%
± 5%
± 5%
±5%
+ 5%
Orifice Coefficient
Average
1.66
1.77
1.84
1.74
1.88
Range
1.56-1.74
1.68-1.84
1.72-1.94
1.73-1.76
1.82-2.02
EPA
1.66
1.77
1.84
1.74
1.88
Criteria
±0.20
±0.20
± 0.20
± 0.20
± 0.20
6-5
-------
The bag samples were analyzed on-site using an Orsat® analyzer. Prior to use the Orsat
analyzer was assembled and replenished with fresh reagents and leak checked as per the
manufacturer's procedures. Known concentrations of EPA Protocol carbon dioxide and
oxygen in nitrogen were then analyzed to confirm proper operation of the Orsat analyzer.
These results are shown in Table 6.4.
6.2.4 Moisture
During sampling, the exit gas of the last impinger was maintained below 68 °F to ensure
complete condensation of stack gas water vapor. The total moisture was determined
gravimetrically using a digital reading top-loading electronic balance. At the scrubber outlets
there was potential for the presence of water droplets in the gas streams. Therefore, a second
moisture determination was made simultaneously with the reference method by measuring the
stack gas temperature at each sample traverse point and assuming that the gas streams were
saturated at that average temperature. The moisture content was then calculated using vapor
pressure tables. The lower moisture value obtained using the reference method and saturation
method was subsequently used in all Method 23 and Method 29 calculations.
6.2.5 Method 23/Method 29
The field sampling QA/QC for Method 23 and method 29 were similar. Table 6.5
summarizes the critical measurements made and the EPA's acceptability criteria. All pre- and
post-test sample train leaks met the acceptance criteria. The isokinetic sampling rates deviated
by no more than 5.2% thereby meeting each method criteria of 90-110%.
Method 23 and Method 29 field blanks were collected near the sampling locations to
check for any sample contamination at the sites. Sample trains were assembled and pre- and
post-test leak checks were conducted. The sample trains were recovered in the same manner
as the actual sample runs.
An acetone blank and quartz fiber filter were taken as control samples for the particulate
analysis and subsequent analysis for the target metals. Blanks were taken of the metals
absorbing and recovery reagents.
6.2.6 Method 25A
The field QA/QC activities for Method 25 A included the use of EPA Protocol calibration
gases; pretest calibration error tests, system bias checks, and response time tests; and post-test
zero and calibration drift determinations. Table 6.6 lists the calibration gas cylinder numbers,
concentrations, and expiration dates. Calibration error tests, system bias checks, calibration
drift checks, and response time checks are shown in Appendix B.I.4.
6-6
-------
TABLE 6.4
SUMMARY OF ORSAT ANALYZER CALIBRATION RESULTS
Run No.
10/22/96
10/23/96
10/24/96
(~^tT\i**Af*-~ XTrt
v^yiinder JNo.
and Contents
ALMO57024
9.85%CO2inN2
13.1%O2inN2
ALMO57024
9.85%CO2inN2
13.1%O2inN2
ALMO57024
9.85%CO2inN2
13.1%O2inN2
Expiration
Date
05/20/99
05/20/99
05/20/99
Analysis
1
9.8
13.0
9.8
13.0
9.9
13.0
2
9.8
13.0
9.7
13.1
9.9
13.0
3
9.8
13.0
9.9
13.0
9.9
13.0
Avg.
9.8
13.0
9.8
13.0
9.9
13.0
Diff., %
0.5
0.8
0.5
0.8
-0.5
0.8
6-7
-------
ON
oo
TABLE 6.5
SUMMARY OF METHOD 23/PROPOSED METHOD 29 FIELD SAMPLING QA/QC DATA
Date Site Run No.
Kiln No. 1
10/22/96 Baghouse Inlet M23-6-I
M29-13-I
Baghouse Outlet M23-6-O
M29-13-O
10/23/96 Baghouse Inlet M23-7-I
M29-14-I
Baghouse Outlet M23-7-O
M29-14-O
10/24/96 Baghouse Inlet M23-8-I
M29-15-I
Baghouse Outlet M23-8-O
M29-15-O
Kiln No. 2
10/21/96 Cooler M29-10
M29-11
M29-12
Pre-Test
Leak Rate
acfrn
0.004 (
0.008
0.003
0.012
0.003
0.014
0.006
0.008
0.002
0.010
0.005
0.003
0.014
0.001
0.003
W 18.5" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 16" Hg
@ 19" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 15" Hg
@ 18" Hg
@ 10" Hg
@ 15" Hg
Post-Test
Leak Rate
acfm
0.008 d
0.005 (<
0.006 d
0.004 <
0.005 a
0.005 (
0.004 a
0.004 <
0.002 a
0.007 @
0.001 d
0.001 (Z
0.001 <£
0.001 (5
0.003 (£
3 18" Hg
2 18" Hg
z>ll"Hg
@ 9" Hg
a 10" Hg
@ 9" Hg
2 10" Hg
® 7" Hg
I> 15" Hg
13.5" Hg
Hl"Hg
3 10" Hg
& 10" Hg
> 9.5" Hg
& 10" Hg
EPA
Criteria
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Percent
Isokinetic
102.0
99.8
99.1
98.3
102.8
101.5
102.7
105.1
103.1
99.7
102.1
107.2
100.6
101.7
102.5
EPA
Criteria
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
90-110%
-------
TABLE 6.6
SUMMARY OF CALIBRATION GAS CYLINDERS
Cylinder Number Contents Expiration Date
AAL2583 Hydrocarbon Free Air
ALM012950 30.04 ppm C3H8 in air 03-17-98
ALM-029561 49.72 ppm C3H8inair 04-18-98
ALM060903 87.86 ppm C3H8 in air 05-15-99
6-9
-------
TABLE 6.7
SUMMARY OF METHOD 23 STANDARDS RECOVERY EFFICIENCIES
FULL SCREEN ANALYSIS
Internal Standards
2,3,7,8-TCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDD
1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2, 3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDF
1, 2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7, 8, 9-OCDD
Surroeate Standards
2,3,7,8-TCDD
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2, 3,4,7, 8,9-HpCDF
Alternate Standards
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
CONFIRMATION
ANALYSIS
Internal Standards
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Percent Recovery
TLI
XAD-2
Blank
72.8
69.4
76.1
71.4
81.2
89.6
85.9
89.7
75.5
105
99.1
103
101
92.3
94.5
99.8
M23-9
Field
Blank
72.8
65.4
59.3
57.2
86.7
92.9
83.8
88.2
64.4
108
105
100
106
87.7
92.5
97.0
M23-6-I
90.8
82.0
82.7
79.2
79.7
85.8
86.3
87.4
74.6
110
112
113
113
101
96.9
102
85.8
M23-6-O
89.9
82.5
87.9
85.0
86.9
96.5
96.9
99.9
88.1
106
102
107
78.1
92.5
91.9
95.6
96.8
M23-7-I
68.0
65.0
70.7
60.4
73.6
79.5
78.0
79.6
63.4
106
98.1
113
109
99.4
85.6
85.9
79.4
M23-7-O
84.0
75.6
80.7
77.5
78.3
97.3
83.6
88.9
73.5
105
100
109
69.9
94.5
91.1
88.5
*
M23-8-I
92.6
83.0
88.9
82.0
94.9
100
95.9
97.4
71.9
105
104
111
109
98.8
108
114
88.6
M23-8-O
81.1
74.5
73.4
67.0
81.6
90.6
86.4
89.1
71.4
106
99.1
106
103
93.6
90.2
92.9
12.0
QC Limits
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
25-130%
25-130%
25-130%
70-140%
70-140%
70-140%
70-140%
70-140%
40-130%
40-130%
40-130%
* Confirmation analysis was not necessary on this sample because no TCDF were detected in the full screen analysis.
6-10
-------
TABLE 6.8
SUMMARY OF METHOD 29 ANALYSIS QC DATA
Lab Control Soikes
Analyte
As
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Mn
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
Spike Amt //g
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Matrix Spikes CPost-Dieestion"). Run
Analyte
As
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Mn
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
* LS-Low
amount
Spike Amt f^g
50
2.5
2.5
25
50
50
50
50
50
50
LCS Recovery
89%
108%
98%
84%
96%
97%
94%
94%
98%
88%
No. M29-1-B
Recovery *
62%
94%
100%
78%
63%
LS
LS
LS
58%
LS
spike; % Recovery is not considered valid
LCS 2 Recovery
92%
101%
93%
94%
96%
95%
91%
96%
98%
90%
Recovery Limit
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
when spike amount is
Recovery Limits
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
less than 20% of recovered
6-11
-------
TABLE 6.8 (Continued)
Duplicate. Run No. M29-13-I
Analyte Sample/^g Duplicate/ug RPD RPD
Limits
As 69.6 69.9 0.4% ±20%
Cd 1.93 1.88 2.6% ±20%
Co 83.4 85.2 2.1% ±20%
Cr 176 179 1.7% ±20%
Ni 138 141 2.2% ±20%
Pb 98.4 101 2.6% ±20%
Sb 15.1 13.8 9.0% ±20%
Se 104 106 1.9% ±20%
Note: Duplicate analysis not reported for elements analyzed by GFAA. Be was analyzed by GFAA
Serial Dilution. Run M29-1-A
Analyte Sample ^g Serial Dilution /^g RPD * RPD
Limits
As 9.17 11.7 <10RDL ±10%
Be 38.1 45.8 <5RDL ±10%
Cd 3.79 4.17 <5RDL ±10%
Co 38.4 44.9 15.6% ± 10%
Cr 56.2 76.9 31.0% ±10%
Mn 78.4 85.1 8.20% ± 10%
Ni 95.9 112 15.5% ±10%
Pb 74.2 91.1 20.4% ± 10%
Sb 23.5 26.9 < 10 RDL ±10%
Se 194 232 17.8% ± 10%
* < 10 RDL / 5 RDL - Serial dilution analyte results are not considered valid when the concentration in the
analyte is less than 10 times the Reported Detection Limit (RDL) for ICP analysis and 5 times the RDL for
GFAA analysis. RPD = Relative percent deviation.
6-12
-------
TABLE 6.8 (Continued)
Method Blank*
Analyte
As
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Mn
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
* Method
Detection Limit
Mg/L
5
1
1
1.5
2
2
3
2
4
3
Blank considered "Pass
MB Recovered
Amount //g/L
-2.37
0.01
0.00
0.00
-0.02
0.49
-1.26
-0.40
2.02
-3.06
" when recovered amount
MB 1 Recovered
Amount f^gfL
-2.62
0.04
-0.67
-0.83
-0.06
0.94
-2.70
0.76
0.40
-0.26
is less than the detection limit
Field Blank and Reagent Blank
Analyte
As
Be
Cd
Co
Cr
Mn
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
Field Blank
Mg
< 0.500
< 0.100
0.450
1.43
8.03
60.0
4.08
2.14
3.36
3.34
1 A Reagent Blank /^g
O.500
< 0.100
0.230
0.260
11.3
4.74
5.67
1.39
5.56
4.51
2A Reagent Blank
Mg
O.500
0.100
O.100
O.150
0.397
0.390
O.300
0.739
0.432
O.300
6-13
-------
TABLE 6.8 (Continued)
Lab Control Spikes - Mercurv Summary Reoort
Sample ID
LCS2
LCS 2 Dup
LCS3
LCS 3 Dup
LCS 4
LCS 4 Dup
LCS
LCS Dup
Matrix Spikes
Sample ID
M29-11
M29-11 Dup
M29-12
M29-12Dup
M29-14-I
M29- 14-1 Dup
M29-15-I
M29- 15-1 Dup
Spike Amt fj.g
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
(Pre-DigestiorO - Mercurv
Spike Amt IJL%
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Recovery
94%
98%
87%
90%
95%
95%
98%
103%
Summarv Report
Recovery *
98%
95%
101%
99%
102%
102%
99%
98%
Recovery Limits
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
80-120%
Recovery Limits
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
75-125%
6-14
-------
TABLE 6.8 (Concluded)
Method Blank -
Sample ID
MB-2
MB-2 Dup
MB-3
MB-3 Dup
MB-4
MB-4 Dup
MB
MB Dup
Field Blank and
Sample ID
FH
FH Dup
BH
BH- Dup
HNO3
HNO3 - Dup
KMnO4
KmnO4 - Dup
HCL
HCL - Dup
Mercurv Summary
Detection Limit
Mg/L
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Report
Recovered Amount
//g/L
0.003
0.003
-0.006
-0.008
0.025
0.020
-0.026
-0.026
Reagent Blank - Mercurv Summary Report
Field Blank /ug
<0.40
<0.40
<0.60
<0.60
<0.20
<0.20
<1.60
<1.60
<0.90
<0.90
Reagent Blank /ug
<0.40
<0.40
<1.20
<1.20
<0.40
<0.40
<1.60
<1.60
<0.90
<0.90
6-15
-------
APPENDIX A
PROCESS DATA
-------
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE
RTI
Center for Environmental Analysis
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Joseph Wood, ESD/MICG (MD-13)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
CJ&
Cybele Brockmann, RTI
July 31, 1997
Process Description for APG Lime
Information Gathering and Analysis for the Lime
Manufacturing Industry NESHAP
EPA Contract 68-D1-0118
ESD Project 95/06
RTI Project 6750-017
Attached is the description of processes at APG Lime; processes
were monitored during testing at the plant October 21-24, 1997.
3040 ''; ;rnwains Roaa • Pos; Office Box 12194 . Researcn Tnangie ParK. liortn Carolina 27709-2194 USA
Teleonone 919 990-8603 • Fax 919 990-8600
-------
I. Process Description of the APG Plant
Lime (calcium oxide, CaO) is typically produced in the U.S.
by crushing and then heating limestone (CaC03) in an inclined,
rotating kiln. The limestone is heated to temperatures of around
2000 degrees Fahrenheit (deg F) which cause it to breakdown
chemically into lime and C02. Some of the lime produced in the
U.S. is hydrated (Ca(OH)2). At APG, lime is sold as CaO and
Ca(OH)2.1
Limestone at the APG plant is extracted from an underground
mine located at the plant. The limestone is milled and screened
to yield three sizes of stone: less than 3/8 inch, 3/8 inch to
11/8 inches, and 11/8 inches to 2 inches.2
During testing, emissions were measured at the inlet and
outlet of the fabric filter (FF) that cleans the exhaust from the
number one kiln and at the stack associated with the cooler of
the number two kiln. Process data from the number one kiln were
collected during testing of its FF. Process data from the number
two kiln were collected during testing of its cooler stack.
The number one and two kilns are inclined rotating kilns
with design capacities of 300 tons of lime per day and 265 tons
of lime per day, respectively.3 Both kilns are approximately 300
feet long with tapered diameters (10 feet in diameter at the
front end of each kiln and 8 feet in diameter the remaining
length of the kilns) .4 The incline of the kilns is % inch per
foot.5 Limestone enters at the back end of each kiln (the high-
est point of incline) and tumbles through the kiln via gravity
and the rotating motion of the kilns (typical rotating rates for
both kilns are 0.25 to 1.2 revolution per minute).6 The resi-
dence time of the feed material in the kiln is 2.5 hours.7
Approximately two tons of limestone are consumed to produce one
ton of lime.8
The combustion of fuel, which consists of pulverized coal
suspended in air, occurs at the front end of each kiln (coal
samples were obtained during testing). Coal for both kilns is
pulverized to the consistency of powder in a single ball mill.
Heated air from the cooling process (described below) is pulled
into the ball mill to preheat and dry the coal. A fan on the
mill blows the air and dry pulverized coal from the mill into
each kiln. Typically a third of a ton of coal is consumed per
ton of lime.9
Lime exiting each kiln is deposited onto the kiln's moving
grate cooler. Ambient air is blown upward through the grates to
cool the lime. Most of the air that cools the lime is routed to
the kilns or to the ball mill to preheat and dry the coal. A
-------
small portion of the air exiting each cooler is released to the
atmosphere through its own stack via natural draft. This was the
gas stream from the number two cooler that was tested. Lime from
each cooler is conveyed to a screener, separated by particle
size, and stored in silos.
II. Kiln Emissions Control
Exhaust gases exiting the number one kiln pass through a FF.
The FF, manufactured by Amerex, was installed in 1994.10 The FF
has six compartments. The bags within the compartments are made
of 22 ounce fiberglass with a teflon finish.11 The air-to-cloth
ratio is 3.4 actual cubic feet per minute per square foot of
fabric.12 The inlet gas temperature for the FF is 495 degrees F,
and the pressure drop across the FF is 6 to 8 inches of water."
The FF runs continuously; during cleaning, one of the six
compartments is taken off-line and cleaned by pulse-jet, while
the other five compartments continue to treat kiln exhaust.14
Refer to Figure 1 for a diagram of the number two kiln and
cooler (the cooler stack is uncontrolled). Refer to Figure 2 for
a diagram of the number one kiln, and the FF that cleans the
exhaust from the number one kiln. The diagrams indicate the
relative locations for each unit operation, direction of flow for
material and gas, input and output of materials and gas, and
approximate locations where process parameters and gas samples
were measured.
Ill. Process Operation
Data indicating the operation of the number one and two
kilns and the FF on the number one kiln are presented in this
section. Data for the number two kiln were collected to provide
an indication of the operation of the number two cooler since no
other cooler operating parameters were monitored by the plant.
Process data for the kilns and the FF were manually recorded
every 15 minutes during the testing from instrument panel screens
in the kiln control room; the recorded data were measured with
instruments already in place and used by the plant for process
control of the kiln.
Table 1 is a statistical summary of the process data
collected during testing. Tables 2a, 2b, and 2c display all of
process data collected during testing.
-------
Notes Pertaining to Test Runs
Limestone feed rate
A constant size of calcitic limestone (3/8 inch to 11/8 inch)
was burned in the number one and number two kilns during testing.
The limestone feed rate into the kilns is not directly measured
by the plant. During testing, the plant provided an approximate
feed rate of limestone into each kiln by weighing a 6 foot
section of limestone on the feed belt to each kiln (see "b" on
Figures 1 and 2 for location of feed belts). According to the
plant, the speed of both feed belts is held constant at 199 feet
per minute; however, the quantity of feed on the belts varies
with the amount of limestone brought up by the bucket elevators
(see Figures 1 and 2 for location of bucket elevators). The
amount of limestone in the elevators is a function of the speed
of the belt beneath the crushed limestone bin; the speed of this
belt is indirectly measured by the %Feed-O-Weight (FOW).1S The
higher the %FOW, the faster the speed of the belt beneath the
bin, which in turn leads to more limestone deposited into the
bucket elevators, and, more feed deposited onto the feed belt
which conveys limestone to the kiln.
The limestone bin conveyor belt speed is varied with the
rotating speed of the kiln (indicated by the motor speed 1, 2, 3,
or 4). When the rotation of the kiln is decreased, the limestone
bin conveyor belt speed is reduced to reduce the amount of feed
going into the kiln. When the rotation of the kiln is increased,
the limestone bin conveyor belt speed is increased to increase
the amount of feed going into the kiln.
Plant personnel weighed a six foot section of limestone on
the feed belt for the number two kiln during testing on 10/21/96.
The six foot section was weighed while the limestone bin conveyor
belt speed was running at 64% (FOW) (the most frequent belt speed
for that day - see Table 2a). At 64% FOW, the weight of the
limestone on a 6 foot section of the feed belt was 22 Ib. This
corresponds to a limestone feed rate of 525 tons per day(TPD) and
a lime production rate of 262 TPD. This compares with the
typical production rate of the number two kiln reported by the
plant to be 265 TPD.16
Plant personnel weighed two different times a six foot
section of limestone from the feed belt of the number one kiln
during testing on 10/22/96. One six foot section was weighed
while the limestone bin conveyor belt speed was running at 50%
FOW (the most frequent speed for that day - see Table 2b); the
other section was weighed while the limestone bin conveyor belt
-------
speed was running at 26% FOW. At 50% FOW, the weight of the
limestone on a 6 foot section of the feed belt was 20 Ib lime-
stone (corresponds to a production rate of 238 TPD of lime). At
26% FOW, the weight of the limestone on a 6 foot section of the
feed belt was 14 Ib limestone (167 TPD of lime). This compares
with the typical production rate of the number one kiln reported
by the plant to be 240 TPD of lime.17
Plant personnel did not weigh a six foot section of
limestone from the feed belt during testing of the number one
kiln on 10/23 and 10/24; on these days, the average limestone bin
conveyor belt speed was 45% FOW and 44% FOW, respectively. To
approximate the limestone feed rates at these settings, the three
known limestone bin conveyor belt speeds and their corresponding
weights from above (i.e., 64% and 22 Ib; 50% and 20 Ib; 26% and
14 Ib) were fitted to a curve (see Figure 3). The equation for
the curve (shown in Figure 3) was used to predict the weight of a
six foot section of limestone on the feed belt at the two
limestone bin conveyor belt speeds. At 44% FOW, the predicted
weight was 18.7 Ib (approximately 224 tons of lime per day). At
45%, the predicted weight was 18.9 Ib (approximately 226 tons of
lime per day).
In summary, the average indirectly measured lime production
rates during testing were typical of the production rates
reported in the questionnaire.18
Coal Feed Rate
During each test run, three samples of pulverized coal were
collected upstream of the kiln. The samples were collected at
the beginning, middle, and end of each test run. The three
samples from each test run were mixed together and a sample of
the mixture sent off for an F-factor analysis. The F-factor
analysis uses the thermal value of coal, along with air flow
measurements, to calculate coal feed rate.
Percent Damper Opening
As indicated in Figures 1 and 2, a single ball mill
pulverizes coal for the number one and number two kilns. Heated
air from each kiln's lime cooler is pulled into the ball mill to
preheat and dry the coal. A fan on the mill blows the air and
dry pulverized coal from the mill to each kiln. Dampers control
the distribution of air and coal to each kiln. Plant personnel
adjust the dampers based on a visual inspection of the FF dust
from each kiln. The color of the FF dust serves as a surrogate
measure of combustion efficiency. FF dust that is too dark
-------
indicates that coal is passing through the kiln unburned;
consequently, the damper setting is increased to increase the
flow of air to the kiln to improve combustion efficiency. The
plant also has oxygen analyzers at the exhaust end of each kiln
to indicate combustion efficiency. Oxygen readings for the
number one kiln were not recorded during testing because the kiln
operators indicated that the analyzer was not working. It was
later learned (several months after testing) that the analyzer
was working during testing.
During testing, the percent damper opening to the number one
kiln was recorded as a possible indicator of coal feed rate
consistency. The damper to the number one kiln is fully open at
74.6%; as shown in Table 1, average settings during kiln 1
testing were 59.6%, 50.9%, and 66.6%.19
Kiln Speed
The speed, i.e., the revolutions per minute (rpm) of the
number one and number two kilns is controlled by four motor
settings. The fourth motor setting is the fastest kiln speed
(1.90 rpm), followed by the third motor setting (1.38 rpm),
second motor setting (0.95 rpm), and first motor setting (0.69
rpm) . The number one and two kilns typically operate in the
fourth motor setting, however, if the front end temperature of
either kiln drops, the speed of that kiln is slowed down (usually
to second or third motor setting) to raise the front end
temperature back up. According to the kiln operator, slowing the
kiln speed raises the temperature of the feed traveling through
the kiln, which in turn transports more heat to the front end of
the kiln.20
Secondary air and back end temperatures
According to one of the kiln operators, target back end and
secondary air temperatures for the number one kiln are 750 deg F
and 300 deg F, respectively, when burning medium stone (the size
of stone burned during testing).21 Target back end and secondary
air temperatures for the number two kiln are 680 deg F and
550 deg F, respectively, when burning medium stone.22 Table 1
shows the average values of back end and secondary air
temperatures for the number one and two kilns during testing;
these temperatures were close to the target temperatures
specified by the kiln operator.
-------
FF temperature and pressure drop
The 1995 questionnaire reports that the inlet temperature
and pressure drop of the FF that treats the number one kiln are
495 deg F and 6 to 8 inches of water, respectively.23 As shown
in Table 1, the average inlet temperature and pressure drop of
the FF were within these reported ranges during testing.
-------
Table 1. Statistical Summary of Process Data Collected at APG
Runs 1,2 & 3, of #2 Cooler Tests
10/21/96; data recorded from 11:32 am to 6:28 pm
Parameters for Kiln #2
Kiln back end temperature (deg F)
% FOW (% of motor capacity of feed belt to bucket elevators )
Temperature of secondary air to kiln (deg F)
Gear Setting on kiln speed (1 through 4; 4 is the highest speed)
mean
672
59
536
4
std. dev.
24
11
45
1
mm.
632
32
395
2
max.
750
65
596
4
n1
29
27
29
29
Run 1 of Kiln 1 Baghouse Test
10/22/96: data recorded from 11:35 am to 5:47 pm
Parameters for Kiln #1
Pressure drop across baghouse (in. of H2O)
Temperature of gas at inlet to baghouse (deg F)
Kiln back end temperature (deg F)
Temperature of secondary air to kiln (deg F)
Gear Setting on kiln speed (1 through 4; 4 is the highest speed)
% FOW (% of motor capacity of feed belt to bucket elevators )
Damper opening for air/coal feeding kiln (%)
mean
8.3
492
751
290
4
45
59.6
std. dev.
0.2
1
20
60
1
12
1.9
mm.
7.9
490
720
30
2
20
58.3
max.
8.6
494
791
342
4
50
62.7
n
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
Run 2 of Kiln 1 Baghouse Test
10/23/96; data recorded from 10:41 am to 3:39 pm
Parameters for Kiln #1
Pressure drop across baghouse (in. of H2O)
Temperature of gas at inlet to baghouse (deg F)
Kiln back end temperature (deg F)
Temperature of secondary air to kiln (deg F)
Gear Setting on kiln speed (1 through 4; 4 is the highest speed)
% FOW (% of motor capacity of feed belt to bucket elevators )
Damper opening for air/coal feeding kiln (%)
mean
8.0
492
751
293
4
45
50.9
std. dev.
0.2
1
10
16
0
6
1.0
mm.
7.8
491
737
262
3
22
50.3
max
8.3
494
768
321
4
48
54.8
n
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
Run 3 of Kiln 1 Baghouse Test
10/24/96; data recorded from 11:05 am to 7:52 pm
Parameters for Kiln #1
Pressure drop across baghouse (in. of H2O)
Temperature of gas at inlet to baghouse (deg F)
Kiln back end temperature (deg F)
Temperature of secondary air to kiln (deg F)
Gear Setting on kiln speed (1 through 4; 4 is the highest speed)
% FOW (% of motor capacity of feed belt to bucket elevators )
Damper opening for air/coal feeding kiln (%)
mean
7.9
491
768
289
4
44
66.6
std. dev.
0.3
1
13
22
0
9
46
mm.
7.5
489
737
255
2
21
60.2
max.
8.3
494
791
327
4
49
74.4
n
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
'n = number of recordings
-------
Table 2a. Process Data
10/21/96; Runs 1, 2, & 3 of Kiln 2 Cooler Tests
Day Kiln Operator = Randy
Time BET (deg F) FOW (%) Sec T (deg F) Gear Setting
started testing approximately 11:25 am
11:32 AM 681 65 596 4
11:47 AM 670 65 577 4
12:02PM 665 65 550 4
after 12:02 PM recording, operator changed FOW to 41% and gear setting to 3
12:17PM 678 41 488 3
12:32 PM 683 62 515 4
12:47PM 654 62 526 4
12:48 PM stopped feed b/c of a hole in the belt (FOW set to 0%); coal was still burning
12:51 PM FOW turned back on to 62%.
12:58PM 731 32 505 2
Feed shut off (FOW set to 0%) to weigh feed samples; process still running
1:03 PM 750 395 3
1:18 PM 644 474 4
1:32 run 1 completed
1:40 PM 632 64 570 4
2:09 PM 649 64 573 4
2:25 PM 660 41 553 3
2:40 PM 658 64 500 4
3:00 PM 652 64 570 4
3:15 PM 646 64 565 4
3:30 PM 654 64 586 4
3:45 PM 649 64 585 4
4:00 PM 679 64 582 4
4:25 PM 689 64 554 4
4:36 PM 682 41 541 3
4:51 PM 677 41 491 3
4:52 PM 677 64 489 4
5:07 PM 672 64 543 4
5:22 PM 681 64 553 4
5:37 PM 680 64 540 4
5:48 PM 683 41 581 3
6:03 PM 689 64 476 4
6:18PM 669 64 529 4
6:28 PM 662 64 541 4
BET (deg F) = back end temperature of kiln
FOW (%) = % of motor capacity of feed belt
Sec T (deg F) = temperature of secondary air to kiln
-------
Table 2b. Process Data
10/22/96; Run 1 of Baghouse Tests
Day Kiln Operator = Tommy
Stone size = 3/8" by 1 and 1/8"
Time BH delta P BHT(degF) BET (deg F) SecT(degF) Gear Setting FOW (%) Damper (%)
11:30 AM 8.4 494 734 294 62.6
FOW stopped around 11:30 AM to weigh feed sample
11:35 AM
11:50 AM
12:05PM
12:25 PM
12:40PM
12:56PM
shortly after
1:20 PM
1:36 PM
1:50 PM
2:05 PM
2:20 PM
port change
2:55 PM
3:37 PM
3:59 PM
4:05 PM
4:20 PM
4:35 PM
4:36 PM
4:51 PM
5:06 PM
5:21 PM
5:35 PM
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.5
8.6
1:00 PM, testing
8.5
8.6
8.4
8.4
8.2
around 2:45 PM
8.2
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8
8
493
493
493
492
494
494
halted
493
493
493
490
493
494
493
493
491
491
490
491
493
491
491
738
738
733
733
726
740
for filter change
724
720
744
746
747
770
774
746
752
791
788
•
761
762
784
764
296
288
296
306
307
311
325
342
338
327
312
30
275
298
256
296
304
283
293
296
302
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
2
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
20
50
20
50
50
50
20
50
50
50
50
62.7
62.7
62.7
62.6
62.7
58.6
58.5
58.6
58.5
58.5
58.6
58.5
58.5
58.4
58.5
58.4
58.4
58.4
58.3
58.4
58.4
5:47 PM 7.9 491 750 301 2 20 58.4
BH delta P = Pressure drop across baghouse (in. of H2O)
BH T (deg F) = Temperature of gas at inlet to baghouse (deg F)
BET (deg F) = Back end temperature of kiln
Sec T (deg F) = temperature of secondary air to kiln
FOW (%) = % of motor capacity of feed belt
-------
Table 2c. Process Data
10/23/96; Run 2 of Baghouse Tests
Day Kiln Operator = Randy
Stone size = 3/8" by 1 and 1/8"
"ime
10:41 AM
10:56 AM
11:15AM
11:30 AM
11:51 AM
12:06 PM
12:22PM
12:37PM
12:52PM
1:15 PM
1:40 PM
1:55 PM
2:25 PM
2:35 PM
2:45 PM
3:07 PM
3:22 PM
3:39 PM
BH delta P
8.1
8.1
8.3
8.1
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.9
8.2
8.3
8.2
7.9
8
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.8
BH T (deg F)
494
493
493
493
491
491
491
491
494
493
493
492
491
492
491
493
491
491
BET (deg F)
744
737
741
745
753
749
742
745
747
743
744
746
768
760
761
763
762
767
Sec T (deg F)
262
266
275
287
286
285
288
290
295
295
291
295
302
316
320
321
303
296
Gear Setting
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
FOW (%)
22
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
48
48
48
48
Damper (%)
50.3
50.3
54.8
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.7
50.6
BH delta P = Pressure drop across baghouse (in. of H2O)
BH T (deg F) = Temperature of gas at inlet to baghouse (deg F)
BET (deg F) = Back end temperature of kiln
Sec T (deg F) = temperature of secondary air to kiln
FOW (%) = % of motor capacity of feed belt
10
-------
Table 2d. Process Data
10/24/96; Run 3 of Baghouse Tests
Day Kiln Operator = Tommy
Time BH delta P BHT(degF) BET (deg F) SecT(degF) Gear Setting FOW(%) Damper (%)
Stone size = 3/8" by 1 and 1/8"
11:05 AM
11:20 AM
11:35 AM
11:50 AM
12:07PM
12:35 PM
12:50 PM
1:05 PM
1:06 PM
1:21 PM
1:36 PM
3:34 PM
3:49 PM
4:05 PM
4:36 PM
4:54 PM
5:1 4PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
6:17 PM
6:31 PM
6:47 PM
7:07 PM
7:22 PM
7:37 PM
7:52 PM
8.3
8.2
8
8
7.9
8.2
8.1
8.1
8.2
8.1
8.2
8.1
8.2
8
8.1
8.1
7.9
8
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.6
490
489
490
491
491
493
491
490
490
493
490
490
491
493
491
491
491
491
493
491
493
493
492
491
494
493
490
764
775
764
764
759
769
777
791
791
787
782
764
765
772
774
758
754
737
763
760
778
785
776
768
767
766
737
302
309
316
315
309
293
269
256
255
259
264
262
266
270
281
299
304
318
323
327
299
268
283
289
281
288
299
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
3
4
4
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
24
48
47
47
47
47
22
46
47
47
47
47
47
22
48
48
48
21
42
47
60.2
60.3
60.2
60.2
60.2
60.2
62.6
64.3
64.3
64.2
64.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
68.3
74.4
74.4
74.4
74.4
BH delta P = Pressure drop across baghouse (in. of
BH T (deg F) = Temperature of gas at inlet to baghouse (deg F)
BET (deg F) = Back end temperature of kiln
Sec T (deg F) = temperature of secondary air to kiln
FOW (%) = % of motor capacity of feed belt
11
-------
To Kiln #1
From Kiln #1
Cooling Process
I
V I
35
Crushed
Limestone Bin
Bucket Elevator
Gas Flow -
Material Flow
Coal.
Pulverizing
Mill
V) Feed Belt
1
Fabric
Filter
i
1
1
1
t
Exhaust Stac
_0 ^
a: loc
b: loc
c: loc
d: loc
e: loc
k f: loc
*• Inr
Limestone Feed
Kiln n
3!
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
Atmosphere
I
Heated
Air
i
I
Cooling Grates
location of % Feed-o-Weight measurement
location where 6 ft sample of feed was weighed
location of back end temperature measurement
location of secondary air measurement
location of % damper opening measurement
location of coal samples
location of gas sampling
Ambient Air
Cooled
Lime
Atmosphere
Figure 1. Kiln #2, #2 Lime Cooler, and Associated Emission Control at APG Lime
-------
Gas Flow -
Material Flow
Exhaust Stack
to the
Atmosphere
From Kiln #2
To Kiln #2 Cooling Process
\ Crushed /
\Limestone Bin /
\ I A
•) (0\
v
Bucket Elev
^^
(o) Feed Belt
°) \
1-
ator j
T
Fabric
Filter
Limestone Feed
Hot Lime
Coal Pulverizing
Mill
/
g /
-i 1
1
L
Hea
A
\
•
ted
r
Atmo!
1
1
&
?r
iu
I?
H
ll
^•s
» -•
4
C 4
^
Cooling Grates
a: location of % Feed-o-Weight measurement
b: location where 6 ft sample of feed was weighed
c: location of back end temperature measurement
d: location of baghouse temperature measurement
e: location of % damper opening measurement
f: location of secondary air measurement
g: location of coal samples
*: location of gas sampling
Cooled
Lime
Ambient Air
Figure 2. Kiln #1, #1 Lime Cooler, and Associated Emission Control at APG Lime
-------
u
U-,
c
o
•3
u
u
*>
§
+*
I
.c
DO
25
20
15
= 8.9414Ln(x)- 15.099
Actual Measurements
Trendline
5
0
0
10
20
30 40
%FOW
50
60
70
Figure 3. Weight of Limestone on 6 ft Section of Feed Belt vs. % FOW (Feed-O- Weight)
-------
REFERENCES
1. APG response to questionnaire sent out in 1995 by the
National Lime Association as part of a voluntary effort with
the Environmental Protection Agency to obtain
data/information for the MACT program.
2. Heath, Elizabeth, Research Triangle Institute. Site Survey
of APG Lime, Inc., Ripplemead, Virginia. February, 1996.
3. Ref 1.
4. Ref 2.
5. Ref 2.
6. Ref 2.
7. Brockmann, Cybele, Research Triangle Institute.
Conversation with plant personnel during testing (10/21/96
through 10/24/96) .
8. Ref 1.
9. Ref 2.
10. Ref 1.
11. 1.
12. 1.
13. 1.
14. Telecommunication between Cybele Brockmann of Research
Triangle Institute and plant personnel on November 25, 1996.
15. Ref 14.
15. 1.
16. 1.
18. Reference 1
15
-------
APPENDIX B
RAW FIELD DATA
-------
Appendix B.I
Raw Field Data
Kiln No. 1
-------
Appendix B. 1.1
Raw Field Data
Kiln No. 1 Baghouse Inlet
-------
EPA METHOD 1
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
M
r
PLANT
CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
rt
CA
STATE
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO OUTSIDE
OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE A)
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO OUTSIDE
OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE B)
.?
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
DISTURBANCE > 0. T
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE
DISTURBANCE
SAMPLER
>
DATE
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
STACK
.D.
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8-INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE DISTANCE
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
1
//
o.ni
r
7
s-t %"•
0.
I
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT
DATE
COMMENTS:
_TE$T N0_
//30 —
SAMPLING TIME (24*r CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION KlUfJ tJO. I BH- 3:*Jl-£T
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS) &J -nr
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
^^^^ RUN
GAS ^\^
C02
O£(NET is ACTUAL o2
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N £ (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
to, %
Ji.o
NET
V*
/3.Z.
a
7t,.o
2
ACTUAL
READING
10,1
HX
NET
ton
I3.Z-
o
-7C.I
3
ACTUAL
READING
- ion
z$x
NET
I(J,1
l*>.1~
d
7t./
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
(O'l
/3.z-
o
16.1
MULTIPLIER
H'lOO
32/100
M/100
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
,Md.
y.Tc/r
•4,m
0
•z-l.^og
TOTAL z0i^
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
4 PLANT AND CITY
DATE
s LOCATION
*5«-oA <>•. \ f 1 1
SAMPLE TYPE
STATIC
AMBI6MT
y&fo *
(d$g< F)
CO
FJUTgR
9TAOK
(In.)..
PITOT
0
11*
THERM
wo, -
.STACK v
WOT
NO,
O&SAT
NO.
USAK
(INITIAl)
OHiOK
O.co\& ij
OK- :-, -
CONTENT
*"''
CONTENT
K.FACTOR
f t.t/ f J f
f / '
.f\
(M!N)
-- -
CLOCK,;
vetoctiy
ORIFICE
OV^N
TEMP
TEMP/
IN/OUT
SAMPLE
r-r
0
&-
lo
0/V 7
£7
^L
0,17
"70
Ho
7/
o.to
7
(,0
-567.11
//
70
O-GO
vr
S-e?
/
V?
~7C
(0
J2&.
0*6,7
~^2.
ti
100
no
a
an
120
^v, or?
TIME
VOUJME
tEMP.
AVE.
"TEMP.
f V <*- r />
. ^/£ /t*k CiifcL *-
t £i°°(> .. fe- ^ " V7
j^a . rt 9-1 'V^
-------
EMISSION TESTINC ID DA TA
Page
of
PLANT ANQ CITY ;
SAMPLE TYPS
-I ^RUNNJLIMBER
LT
/Vj/ftyjL.
-WAV:
POINT
NO.^
' CLOCK-
FILTER >
-OVEN/
TEMP^
( F):
;SILGEU
DGM
; IN/OUT
TEMP
-TEMP.
( n
AMPLE
ACUUi
(In. Hg)
CWSr
5
?o
r
\LQ
Qc?
6
no
JZ
IW
ar?
flV7
r?
ho
JQ.O
0.10
io*
ro
r/
220
O.io
a
/?-•
OTAH
Totals
VG.JSQPT
OGM^F
-77
Shoot Checkoff By:
Dale
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Run No.:
Sample Date:
Filter No.(s):
A
Job No.:
Sample Location:
fjp. I
Recovery Date:
XAD-2 Trap No.(s):
Sample Recovery Person:
1)1
Moisture Data
Impingers
XAD-2
Trap
1
(knockout)
(100mlH2O)
(100mlH2O)
(tipped)
(knockout)
(untipped)
Ttjp
2
Silica gel
(untipped)
Final wt.
770
Initial wt.
Netwt.
g
Description
Train System:
-2.3
Impinger Contents:
Silica Gel: @Grams Used -
% Spent- (oO
Condensate Observed In Front Half:
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
marked/sealed: LS
XAD Module Container No.:
T
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.£3
marked/sealed: Is
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.: i 3 -£
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Impinger ContemssQontainer No.:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
)inger Rinse (AcetoneVM
Impinger Rinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.:
Liquid level
marked/se
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
COMMENTS:
/'0 -
SAMPLING TIME (Wa CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATIOM
TEST NO
V0 —
, I
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS)
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
^^^^^ RUN
GAS ^\
C02
O£(NET is ACTUAL oz
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(HET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
/6-3
<2V'^
NET
10,%
M
• —
7S^
2
ACTUAL
READING
/O-l-
w.^
NET
10.2.
1^,0
—
1$,1r
l
ACTUAL
READING
1^1-
NET
/CI3
11. *1
—
isfr
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
/0.2>
/3 ^
—
1Z.<6
MULTIPLIER
"'100
".'100
M/100
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md-
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
' PLANT AND CITY
\ , DAT! '
10/33 fat
SAMPLING LOCATION
/*)
OPERATOR ^ ^'
AMBIENT
, F)
Mfcifeiuhl
.. FACTOR (Y)
wo.
STACK
PffOT
NO,
^(MJNr
CLQCK
' TIME s^
vetoctw
OFIIFIOE
(In, H2Q)
STADK
{deg, F)
OVEN
IMWNQEft
TEMP -',
<|n, Hg)
6 /
Id -HO
10
30
-70
_££.
r/
-71
7
C,0
H70.rO
nni
XI
10
~7o^
M.
. 7Y
0,62
JZL
_2_L
10
to
37
II
too
/J.
I/O
S"o/
?o
/V^
Ida
TQTAl
TIME
VOLUME
AVESQRT
tielteP '
delta H
' AVg, ,
TEMP.
AVE-,
o
/s- ",
-------
EMISSION TESTINC 'LD DA TA
Page
of
PLANT AND CITY %
, LOCATION-
^SAMPLE TYPE,
<- RUN NUMBER
f
i/A
J. «
POINT
NO.
ELAPS
;TIME
xMfo
CLOCK '
FILTER
;OVEN,
,TEMP -
DGM
IN/OUT
TEMP
AUX.
TEMP.
( F)
SAMPLE
TRAIN:
ACUU
(In. Hg)
A
230
2-
_&VL
67
3?
HO
rp6
L\
iro
70
160
7o
I2«L
0.11
ho
tf.frfr
71
0.77
7?
/i
O.ft
73
77
0.79
7?
>TOTAU
Page -
rotate"
S/700/ Cliockod By.
,-AVG •
DGM F
10
Dale
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: %- (? & L ^^
Sample Date: ' /WZ3/? £
Filter No.(s): // A-
Run No.:/ 3- 7— T
Job No.: 5^0/. 002>
Sample Location: \ULtJ k$0 , / £ /hffrzrvjiS E -W ueT~~
Recovery Date: /# /2 3 / ^ &
Sample Recovery Person: £
1
Impingers XAD - 2 (knockout)
Trap
Final wt. ~2l)33> ^2^.^
Initial wt. i. 9 ~7< 7 ty 7 V, 4^
Net wt. _5~, 6 2; # . 1
XAD-2 Trap No.(s): 2L 3 - 7- ~H
-^ ili.Uj
Moisture Data
2 3
(100mlH2O) (100mlH2O)
/(tiiillppyc^ti ^-(ttpped^v
fe' 7 ^ ^ ^ ' £~~79; &}
^T^T^Ty ^tfti L^
- A p -' ; . t-
Description
4
(knockout) Silica gel
iuntipped) _(_untipped_)_
^/*7^S~ ^^.D g
v 7"Z ^ ^/^ .Z> g
2., "i ^ _/>, 2> j
-74/3
Train System: /7 — 2-J3
Probe: ^ /r '*y£
Condensate Observed In Front Half: /v-i ^
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) &. Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impinber Contents^Container RQ
\ \_
ImpinqenRinse (Aceto*e/MeCI2)
•
Cohtainer No.: ^
marked/sealed: ^>^
marked/sealed: ^
Liquid level ^/
marked/sealed:
Liquid level y'
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed^ *
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
COMMENTS:
.TEST N0
SAMPLING TIME (Ztfc CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
AJ0. /
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD _
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
\^^ RUN
GAS ^\^
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
to. a
Mo
NET
IO.O
/V.fl
—
%.6
2
ACTUAL
READING
^.*7
^0
NET
*tf
Ul
—
Id.o
3
ACTUAL
READING
W
^.°l
NET
9.9
/«/,o
—
9C./
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
9,?
/4.Q
—
nl.l
MULTIPLIER
M/100
32.'100
M/ioo
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md-
y.*r>
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT
DATE
COMMENTS:
TECT HO.
-£4 - r
SAMPLING TIME (Mu CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
JO. I
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
^^^^^ RUN
GAS ^\
C02
02
3
ACTUAL
READING
'/0,£
^V./
NET
10 tt-
tZl
—
7^^
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
(0.1,
73.^
—
7^-1
MULTIPLIER
4
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
PLANT AND CITY
T.
7J"
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPl£TYPE
RUN
OPERATOR
AMBIENT
STATIC
ffflSSS
........ feHg)
2.fr
AMPBNT
F)
FIU3R
ID
(In.)
PITOT
PROBE LENGTH
AND UNE8 TYPE
MQ19TUR8
DOM
;CAL
.FACTQR(Y)
THERM
NO.
STACK
' NO,
ORSAT
NO,
\MIN)
CLOCK
H6AO,
ORIFICE
OVKN
TKMP
.(dag, PJ
O.HI
/O
-I?.
J10_
_Zi.
$-11
7;
7
O^-
10
. 1 L
S333
pr/
.&.
JJL
71 vi
/av
I/O
TTvT
L^_
rv
"TIME
DQM r
VOLUME '
AVESQRT
delta P'
TEMP.
AVE.
TEMP,
^<,u
6) ,005
-------
IDATE
NUMBER
,
/? I T
\ JfatA. t\. t ff> f *X- ^
JPOINTC
"NO*
PSEO'k^
? (-( F)
SAMPL
ACUU
(In. Hg
Ui^L
A 01
vr
fe6l.oq
aw
0-yr
J^Z.
* C?
ar
?0
672.
r
"7
2oo
r> r?
d
'0
^LJi.
0/7?
6s-
6?
TOTAfc
Totals
VG.SQRT
S/;oof Chocked Dy:
cAVG <
Date
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA JBHL«
Plant: h-
-QCr <
f
Sample Date: /Z> ^L^ZL,
«?
Sample Location: >
Filter No.(s):
^$L> */*j *&£.
Recovery Date: ]P — 2.s~.&-3 — j_
7S> 0 / /
z/^^ i/
JT/y> <9
T '
Mh-
^
XAD-2 Trap No.(s): ZO -
^^
Moisture
(100mlH2O)
(untipped)
<~" -0 ft --2,
<-> ItVt-?
3 , 7
Data
(100mlH2O)
(tipped)
<±&=Z?J
s^y 9, 2-
; . /
Run No
.:2L3-ify
•)-:
Job No.: S V£> /
^ST^-
-@ ' i '
" P — /
4
(knockout)
(untipped)
^fy^LSI*--\
Impinger Contents: /L/^L-v
Silica Gel:
@Grams
Used -^"/
? £> Color -
Condensate Observed In Front Half: />L^
/
A^W %
(?
LcJitL^
jSJlk
7- jr~~~
^
^
,
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH)
Probe (FH)
& Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
& Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
V V \ X
Impinger Contents Container No.:\ \
ImpingerVR
inse (Acetone/MeCI2)
Container No.,
.— ^-rf= —
marked/sealed: ^
marked/sealed: '—^'
Liquid level /
marked/sealed:
Liquid level .
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
manXe.d/sealed: • A n
T:
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
...QAii";r
PAGE 1 of
PUNT AND CITY
UH^RiPPi^Mitt
fiBAOINOL .
IS - O.
-------
EMISSION TESTINC ~LD DA TA
Page Z- of
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
.^SAMPLING. LOCATION^ SAMPLE TYPE
I RUN NUMBER
POINT
NO.
EUPSE
TEST'
- TIME',
CLOCK
TIME
(24-hr)
-; ^GASMensfti
f *-- READING" f
.< ,
V6LOCI1Y
,OFtlFICE
r - .
rfiTA
1 .TEMP-
FILTER
OVEN
TEMP^
SILGEL
MflNGGF
5 "TEMP I
DGM
IN/OUT
TEMP
, ( F)
AUX.
TEMP.
SAMPLE
TRAIN
ACUU
(In. Hg)
0.
A-
/So
0,55
Z25
228
4-
fo
738
4^
/S56
3,67.
aez-
22a
233
6
0.73
22^
2L3D
E4-
7
2-
22
23 /
oJLeO
•e^2_23/
73
A.
6-65
n/3
6o2-22g>
220
W
344-.
/•age
JOTAU
T1M£
VGSQRT
'
- AVG;
DdM1 F
Sheet Checked By:
Date
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA 1 "? Bgg
\ ^\ DrMVWe*M
29- 11
\ ^\
Plant
: /fe
Run No.:
Date:
Sample Box No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location
: l\0 t
uAG iJvuSg /
Sample Type:
Sample Recovery Person:
C^A-
Container Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Front Half
1
Filter No.(s)
Acetone Rinse
Nitric Rinse
Back Half
Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Moisture Data
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Initial
Final
\AAT
7
(O/
—3^7
a.
r
JJIL
-67.3
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
CITY
APC, LlHB.- ftPPL£HteADs
AMBIENT
PRESS
(iruHg)
STATIC
pness
(ir»> HO}
o.n»HfflL..
^
AMJ3I6NT
TEMP
. F)
FJU'^R
9TACK
(la)
PITOT
Op'
7.8. n
ASSUMED
MQI3TUBS
....<*)
DOM
BOX No,
CAL
FACTOR (Y)
STACK
TM8RM
WO.
STACK
PfTOT
NO,
OBSAT
NQ.
LSAK ^
ONKCK
t^AK
OONTENT
OONTENT
KFACTOft
4-
M5-7
0.0/4 0-
-------
* 9 *
SAMPLE
FILTER
!•>«- -P ' '
OVEN
IN/OUT
nw
£.77
1350
l4tt>
. 73
D.53
0-73
5/r
-77
77
606
434-.
5o7
0.6D
4-3D
23D
AVGiSQHT
WO
Chocked By:
Date
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
BIB
BMOHC BM
Plant:
Run No.:
- /4--J
Date: fe
Sample JBox No.: 2^-yV- T I Job No.:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
Sample Recovery Person:
Container
Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Front Half
1
Filter No.(s)
/o3 7
Acetone Rinse
Nitric Rinse
Back Half
Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
SB
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
t >" C
Moisture Data:
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Initial
Weight, grams
Final
Net
\
4/3, ,5"
, 7
y
4
IM
r
Total
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
PLANT AND CITY
.DATE
" SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
flUN
AMBIENT
\ STATIC ,
TgMP
. F)
gTACK
10
(In,)
PITOT-
Op' '
NUMBER
7
BOXW
^ QAt
()
STAOK
THISFllvt
% MO.
FflTOT
NO,
NQ.
LSAK'
OHKOK
oa ,
CONTENT
coa v
CONTENT
K'FACTOft
O.DI&
/
7
(MiK)
CLOCK
BEAOINO
vetoctw
H6AO^
tin, H2Q)
H
OFFICE
da HBO)
STACK
- T8MP -'%
{deg, F}
OV6N
TKMP
TEMP'
(deg, F)
IN/OUT;:
TEMF;'^
SAMPLE
JflAlN-
c;
h
/o
VOLUME
AVKSQRT
delta F>;
TEMP.
TEMP,
-------
EMISSION TESTING 'LD DATA
Page -C. of
-. PLANT AND GlTf^ ^^><\$,£
t rt
POINT
NO.
I/
~7
T
Totals
ELAPSE
*Ttt=sr
'.TIME;
iro
no.
Ho
&T-OTAU
(S2S
(535
IDATE
. 63
617.
- zo
n L,
545.ZS
/OOr.OOO
£>.€£>
p.e?
o.?/
49S
sie>
5/3
511
5/6
-^'AVG, s
^SAMPLE TYRE
-246
' TEMP
s -t F>
NUMBER
4?
^2
DGM
MN/OUT
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
MantAfe L
Date:
Samle Box No.:
-VT-X
Job No.: ^-4^1
Sample Location:
(
/MCrT-
Sample Type:
Sample Recovery Person:
Container Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Front Half
1
Filter No.(s) 1?0
P
Acetone Rinse
Nitric Rinse
Back Half
Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Moisture Data
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Weight, grams
Initial
Final
Net
V
ifVvT
O
10)
VQo
D
-
Total
Comments:
-------
Appendix B.I.2
Raw Field Data
Kiln No. 1 - Baghouse Outlet
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
Plant: AP&
Date: I O -
Sampling Location:.
~^
Inside of Far Wall to Outside of Nipple:.
Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Nipple (Nipple Length): C
Stack I.D.: "1 7. -
Distance Downstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance B):
^lO^ inches / Stack I.D. = 5.G dd
Distance Upstream from Flow Disturbance (Distance A):
^2O inches / Stack I.D. = 5.g dd
Calculated Bv: T-A / 3 F
Schematic of
Sampling Location
Traverse
Point
Number
\
z
3>
L]
S
Fraction
of
Length
O.OZ.G
^•Ofrl
O . l^tr
O 2ZG
£;'- m z
Length
(inches)
-72.ZS
\L
Product of
Columns 2&.3
(To nearest 1/8")
/ f
S 9
/C. 5
/6. 3
2V, "7
Nipple
Length
(inches)
^
L
^
Traverse Point
Location
(Sum of Col. 4 & 5)
"7.1
yi
-------
D
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE
Date:
V
Sampling Lo
Run #: 7
Barometric P
Moisture, %:
Stack Dimen
Wet Bulb, °F
Traverse
Point
Number
1
~Z.
3
H
$
I
•Z,
3
Y
5
i
2,
1
V
5
/
2
3
h
5
cation: 7bwli^ ^-~tlH Clock Time:
W) ,Vn . ODeratnrs1 TV**/ fif=
ressure, in. h
M.U
^- -)£•»» Static Pressure, in. I-UO: -,08
Molecular wt.. Drv: 2t^ PitOt Tube, Cp: • **/
sion, in. Diameter or Side
DrvE
Velocity
Head
in. H2O
/I I
.10
,01
, u2_
>/O
./".S
t (j? 5
'(^3
.3"^
.33
> CaO?
^^
.Y^Z
t SCo
3<]
,O6
-TO
f^
, si
,w
fif -C^.TCni
Stack
Temp.
°F
>V^>1
y/o
HJQ
V/0
^O^
*i/0
1*1-
167
IJC&
2tf5
^ IO
v/o
H/6
1/0
1c^
i/o
^6$
n /o
tJO^
M#
Ts = ^0^
s1: 12- ^5" Side 2:
*ijlh,°p
Md « (0.44x%CO2) + (0.32 x%O2) + (0.26x%N2)
6 >3
Md = (0.44 x £*> ) + (0.32 x ^ ) -t- (0.28 x )
Md - Z&l. 3^s
% H2O % H2O
100 100
Ms = ( )x(1._3_,+ie(^—)
~ uV> ^
9 P ~, Lt 3
p0 T. pb + *»•"• - ( ) + ..
13.6 ' ' 13.6
Ps •=")£• -if In. Hg
*-§ • t-S
^Jp" = 0 .7t^^-
— | Ts <°R)
Vs-bb.4WxOpx^Px ^ pgxM8
V3~8549x( )x( )^A/ i i . i
Aa= 18 Ml «2
Qs = Vs x As x 60 s/m
Qs- x x60
Qs = (^^ 3>C i acfm
' P. %H,0
Qs . ,= Qsx 17.647 x x(1- - )
»™ fs 100
Q.rtd- XI7.047X --X(1. 10Q )
2Jp-<5.5€>S Qs«td= .C2 icvydscfm
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant: f\Y(^ Ll r»e /^- Samp
Sampling Location Jt^/W^ £)^lLeJ' ^c"/« < Pbar:
Run Number:
eTyp
/M-'V- ( Date: /^-2/-£l cfm@ /^ in. Hg. Probe LengtfVType: Pilot if:
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: Orsat:
TraverM
Point
Numbe
.
U-
Sampling
Time
(mln)
&
so
J ^l
"~J^^\
dock Time
dock)
-
Stack Diameter: -7? . 2-5" As:
Gas Meter
Reading
(Vm)n3
•~^ftyj / C/^7
jr/Ji •"» w
toO'V n
^/"7 . tx"7 V
i>Lc^ft -
tAn.sp -
^M/ - /, 3^>-
%«A -5-
//i>
Velocity
Head (Ap)
inH2O
Otifice Pressure DrflBrenlial
(AH) in H2O
Desired
Actual
Stack
Temp
(Ts)
Nozzje l[
Assumed
Meter Bo
Post-Tes
PoslTesI
Temperature
°F
Probe
Fdtor
): Therira
1 Bws: Filter *
x#:vJ5_Y:^ll
t Leak Rate: ,0^-2.
Leak Check: Pilot:
Impinger
Temp.
°F
jcouple 3-6.
cfm @ '° in. Hg.
Orsat:
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Met
(Tm in°F)
Outlet
(Tm out°F)
Pump
Vacuum
(«.Hg)
^y/' •' . ' /'////////////////// .•' . //-^/////////y//////y//////////.
(n.(.O(_2-ei*
~^
27
-TL.
7 "7
7$
-\
-------
Plant!
r^
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Run No.:
_ Job No.:
Sample E®x No.:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:.
Rlter No.:
Sample Recovery Person:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Acetone
Container No.:
Rlter
Container No.:
Liquid
Level Marked:.
Sealed:
Sealed:
Description of Rlter:
Samples Stored and Locked:
BACK HALF/MOISTURE
Container No.:
Liquid Level Marked:.
Sealed:
IMP. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
CONTENTS
WIT <& -fe£^
^ s«\ IH^^.
TOTAL
INITIAL
VOL (ml)
WEIGHT farams}
INITIAL
/
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT
DATE
COMMENTS:
10 -l-Z-
TE$T N0
5
SAMPLING TIME (2«ir CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
fJo . I
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED. CONTINUOUS)
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
^^^ RUN
GAS ^^\
C02
02^
NET
*.£
flJ-1
—
76. (.
3
ACTUAL
READING
-£?£
te^
NET
^(f,
t^^r
—
lc>.(.
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
Sr-C
M.
MULTIPLIER
"'100
32/100
W/100
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md-
3.7V0
H^76^
O
&(. ^^tir
•z^MSJ*
-------
Plant: frffr Lima.
Sampling Location
/ni^^rORun Number. p£3-l3- O Date:
Pretest Leak Rate: C>.Oo3 cfm @ I*T in. Hg
Pretest Leak Check: Pitot: /Orsat:
FIELD DATA SHEET
Sample Type: M-2.3 Operator:
Pbar: 23. 3& Ps:
C02:
Nozzle ID: ,25C> Thermocouple *'.
Assumed Bws: ,oS Filler #: A//4" ' '•' ••?$%%
— • * 1; fj t \
_i_ I "J . '' i
Meter Box #: /y Y: Aoo3_AH@: _A
• I ' :
Post-Test Leak Rate: ,ooL> cfm @ , / in. Hg
Post Test Leak Check: Prtot: Orsat:
Probe Length/Type: H*
^.'•M
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA JHL-*—..*
t
Plant: &-& G* /-^^M
Sample Date: /£>— ^^"^L
Sample Location: A^J^ PYG
Recovery Date: /^> "^^"il
Sample Recovery Person: £~
1
Impingers XAD - 2 (knockout)
Trap
Final wt. 3}<%.7 .^G-3.,0
Initial wt. 1>£$_b> LJ-%ZL, *X
Net wt. Lj . 2_ ^ A i-
c
Ot **J S yV
Run No.: Z- > "OrcX,
Filter No.(s): // j^~ Job No.: <, 4/ ^> « ^7 f |^ 3 tj/ x ^"» L^ '•/) v^ ^ ^--j g
5~}fe7""? S*'7fa ^taEl^L tf&>L,^3 g
~ 2 , 1 b , <-{ / > f 3A ^ 9
Description J/y,L/
Train System: ^£"7 — <2c ^
Probe: Ij Jf ^iJL.^t
Filter: Color- U^^j &YU>^
Impinger Contents: rjtA^\
Loading- /yxj£-zfc' J^L^n
1
Silica Gel: ©Grams Used - & 0 D Color- ^/^T % Spent- ~7£>
Condensate Observed In Front Half: />u< ^
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No. 21 3 ^ <£ — ^) marked/sealed: ^ — "
XAD Module Container No.:
^ "3 — ^> -^ ^ marked/sealed:
Liquid level -—
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:^-3 -^- D marked/sealed:
Liquid level ^^--
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.: 1^-6 ~v marked/sealed:
Impinger Contents ubotainer No
\ "x. Liquid level
.: \ \ marked/sealed:
\ \ V \ Liquid level
Impinger RinSe (Acetone/MeCI2) Containec No.: , * • marked/sealed:,,
Ftf j^cKtcn - FtyR
D
M
tt fi^fjlc**/ %<&«s>^ /w^i+~y. frfiijyfr-,
••^T^ft
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLAHT.
OATE_
COMMENTS:
A7--23.--9JE,
SAMPLING TIME (24-hi CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION K-tL>lJ
.TEST NO
/Jff. I
S/t"
SAMPLE TYPE (BAB, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS)
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
^^-^^^ RUN
GAS ^\
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
°l-<*
-£*>.%
NET
9.fr
^.-^
—
76.^
2
ACTUAL
READING
9.r
^3,p
NET
?.^T
^3
—
7^.2_
3
ACTUAL
READING
-^6
^5^
NET
16
Af,2~
—
7^-2-
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
?,£
t*2-
, —
-7(.Z-
MULTIPLIER
«.'1M
32/100
^/lOO
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
%
-------
V - l-
Plant: ft?G L:
FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location
-0 Run Number:
Date:
fout
Sample Type:
K.lJPbar: ^0. /
CO2: ((
Ps:
O2:
• , i1 •• •
Operator: fam/R? Nozzle ID: . 2.5y Thermocouple #:
Filter*:
Pretest Leak Rate: a.oo£ cfm @ j$I '" H9
Pretest Leak Check: Pitot: ^ Orsal: -^
Probe Lengthflype: t/ '
Slack Diameter: 46"
pftot
As.
Assumed Bws: ^ _
Meter Box #: /
-------
7T77
^M^J fr
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA JBB— «-
;
;
Plant: ft- PG /^lw
Sample Date: /'/? - 23 - -^ Filter No.(s): // /L-
Sample Location: ^LA-o 7// . ) 2$ ^LeJL^t^'^
Recovery Date: JD ^ 2~2-?i XAD-2 Trap No.(s): -^-.3-
sj$Jl
-7-£>
Sample Recovery Person: O ^ U^-^i
Moisture Data
1 2 3
Impingers XAD-2 (knockout) (100mlH2O) (100mlH2O)
Trap ^^tmtipped^ (tipped)
Final wt. 3#X^ S~S'f?_, Sf ^"7^,^-f) ^~?b, /
Initial wt. .W^fi £)%Zt\ ^T&ZTfy S"7tff i
Netwt. ^» } 7 1 D Color - ^vV/ % Spent - ^ ^^
Condensate Observed In Front Half: /-vu-? ^
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impiraer Contents Container NV:
ImpingeVRinse (Acetone/MeCI2) Container No.' .
£// A*^£^,— Pti^fi/J tscJ&r^ , &L
(hM/h^^L^ - XAJ) fa*tf\
\ / ' -~^ U ' //
marked/sealed: c~^
marked/sealed: ^^
Liquid level
marked/sealed: """^
Liquid level
marked/sealed: -^
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed: ,
-~-~+*f
^-»
-------
GAS ANALYSIS DATA FORM
PLANT.
DATE_
COMMENTS:
/'0~~2y-
.TEST NO.
SAMPLING TIME (24*r CLOCK!
SAMPLING LOCATION
- /73/
*Jo.< &I+-
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS)
ANALYTICAL METHOD
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR
\^ RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
02 (NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
*-7
?3^
NET
F.7
N.1
—
1(f.(f
2
ACTUAL
READING
^-.f-
l£<(0
NET
s-x
1+3
—
76- ^
3
ACTUAL
READING
-f,r
Z3,5"
NET
e.^-
H7
—
?^r
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
r.f
t^.1
—
1(c^
MULTIPLIER
44 '100
32/100
M/100
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
«d.
3.£9^
V.7^/V
^3
'ZIM'zd
TOTAL ^Vzljg
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant: .,
Sampling Location /w.
Run Number:
Sample Type:
Operator:
: (ofa
CO2:
Ps:
O2:
12-
\C_ v t .
Nozzle ID: (.
Assumed Bws:
Meter Box #:|/y
Thermocouple #:
Filter #:
Y:
Pretest Leak Rate: <3, <%)$"" cfm @ /S~'n. Hg. Probe Length/Type: _|
Pretest Leak Check: Pilot: J Orsat. i/ Slack Diameter.
Pilot #:
As:
Post-Test Leak Rale: £).<%) I cfm @ _(f_ in. Hg.
Post Test Leak Check: Pitot: Orsat:
iTravarse
Point
Numb*
2,
4
Desired
Actual
Samplin
Tim.
(mln)
04
100
OodcTifTw
(24-hour
dock)
1113
1641
Gas Mater
Reading
. 'T
U^L
J&8L1
[o^o
jilt'Cs
Velocity
Hwid (Ap)
inH2O
OriSc* Pleuure Oitterential
(AH) in H2O
Stack
Temp
(Ts)
Temperature
°F
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Dry Gas Meier Temp.
Inlet
Outiet
Pump
Vacuum
o.
0,611-
0.66
I.A6
2.1'
7.0
4i r
393
74?-
•2,^-7
252-
53
46
60
(*<>'
9
5T
'
3C
(91
1 -T
-------
METHOD 23 CDD/CDF SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA fflHL^-^^
>
•>
/
Plant: A (? £ £ ^^j
Sample Date: //^-2- V -^£ Filter No.(s): N /)—
Sample Location: yt^-^L Mb-/ ^>^-^A^c<^^ L
Run No.: ^~ ^ —^P- ^)
Job No
.: <> ^,. /
O^W^
Recovery Date: jp^lf-/" $/ XAD-2 Trap No.(s): 2.^3 ^ #— Z)
Sample Recovery Person: Cl- ^ ^C
Moisture Data
1 2 3
Impingers XAD-2 (knockout) (100mlH2O) (100mlH2O)
Trap /fCfntippBd)x (tipped)
Final wt. "?>S 9, L 5~~?~?.\ 3^~7h*&} ^TT7^^^
Initial wt. 3)^>7 t-f'^Q.'i SS W. ^7 ^T^L^ 1
Netwt. /^*^/ IhJ^it — -"^ ,6^ D> /^3.- 6»
Probe: £/ ^J &~jL&^<<~
Filter: Color- Jt2j>$J ^L~
/7
Condensate Observed In Front Half: x2W
Recovered Sample Fractions
Filter Container No.
XAD Module Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Acetone) Container No.:
Probe (FH) & Back Half Rinse (Toluene) Container No.:
Impinger Contents ISontainerNo.: \
ImpingeiLRinse (Aceto\e/MeCI2) Container No.: ±-f\
^ff^^VH^T'
marked/sealed: ^^
marked/sealed: <~^
Liquid level
marked/sealed: ^x^
Liquid level s
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed:
Liquid level
marked/sealed: -*
-Tr^r^.-
-------
FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant:
Sampling Location
Run Number: .A re.
Sample Type: j^_
Pbar: 26
C02:
_ Operator: T
.Ps:
02:
Pretest Leak Rate: , QI2. cfrn @ }{_? in. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pitol: ,/- Orsat: ,\/^
Probe Length/Type: _f' Qjafs Pilot #.
Slack Diameter: TJ. 2^ As:
Noz2le ID: ,2.55 Thermocouple
Assumed Bws: .05- Filter #:
Meter Box #: /.
Y: .
Post Test Leak Rate. t
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA \A SSJj
%p |C-(- b^,mm^mm.m^m.»
Plant: j\iG> Liwe CowPfa*v
Date: (C>P7M^
Sample Box No.: Z^
-j^-b
Sample Location: /™-f l^-Oi (jv('JL(?r~ -
Run No.: ??-l^ 'O
JobNo.:S'40f
Sample Type: Iflntft/uO ¥1
Sample Recovery Person: |/r\ VfYli U- r-
Container Description
Front Half
1 Filter No.(s) 30 &Q
2 Acetone Rinse
3 Nitric Rinse
Back Half
4 Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Moisture Data
Impinger
No.
I
1
3
4
^•^
6^^
w^ JT AJUH^k fiLAT\'j
^ n
/iM *
J
-------
C.
Plant:
Sampling Location
Run Number: j^-zl - m-O Date
Pretest Leak Rate: ,oc>
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Run No.:
Date: (u/2?^fc
Sample-Box No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location:
/
OUTLET'
Sample Type:
Z °i
Sample Recovery Person:
t^\
Container Description
Volume, ml Sealed/Level Marked
Front Half
1
Filter No. (s)
MS
Acetone Rinse
Nitric Rinse
Back Half
Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1 ,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A
Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B
KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C
HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
Moisture Data
Impinger
No.
Contents
Initial
Volume, ml
Initial
Weight, grams
Final
Net
IAAT
u
C.
/
r
6SZT-.
Atf.l
0,2.
Total
Comments:
-------
Plant: fftt* Lt
?"V
Sampling Location
Run Number: tv\-?i -15-o Date: ,0-2-'*»"'%'
Pretest Leak Rate: ,00$ cfm @ /6 in. Hg.
Pretest Leak Check: Pitot: if- Orsat:
FIELD DATA SHEET
Sample Type: /V\-Z? Operator
02: "*"
Nozzle ID: ,
12-
C02: (/
Prob--; Length/Type:
Stack Diameter: ~r2. 2.5 As:
Thermocouple #:
Filter #: 3o ] fe
Y: ,
Pilot #:
Assumed Bws: ,
Meter Box #: /
Post-Test Leak Rate: Q.Cb | cfm @ (O_ in. Hg.
Post Test Leak Check: Pilot: __ Orsat:
Traverea
Point
Numbe
O
/
Sampling
Tim
Mn)
/I
•72
/O*
dock)
111!
Gu Meter
Reading
(Vm)fl3
'///, i "2S
A
lf
,i
•7^0,
Vetocrty
Head (Ap)
inH2O
Orific*
in H2O
Desired
Actual
Stack
lemp
Temperature
°F
^J7^
.,_*! L
-Gi
[ Probe ( Fdter
Impinger
Temp.
°F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(Tm in°F)
/. 7
/..-r
AV
±^
'vfe
'-f
/.I
±JL
HIS
Hn
^TL
J-fsO
^55
Outlet
(Tni oul0F)
Pump
Vacuum
(in.Hg)
2S6
-50
52-
£/
•sz
62-
72,
77
6?
75
~n
18
±L
Q3L
I.Z.
Ho]
253
15
Tm =
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
-------
Appendix B.I.3
Raw Field Data
Kiln No. 1 - Total Hydrocarbons
-------
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
,M£
Plant:
Location:
Date: 10- 2^- q b
FT
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2, NOx*.(tHC) CO
Operator: _^ _
Project #: S4OI. OQ3 _
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) _ (CD-0.500)
m
)
Run
#
Time**
(24-Hr)
HMD - 11:00
-12'. 10
-li: 40
~ I?,1- OC>
-IV. 2.0
-|^>:4D
14'. oo- i4'.i
1,2
1.2
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,0
Comments
KiurJ Ki«. 1
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + N02 , or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked Bv:
/
Date:.
Date:
-------
CEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date:
C
Parameter
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) (00-0.32^)
= —
m
Run
#
Time**
(24-Hr)
r-4o - \z-oc>
— 2. '2.0
- 11 •. 4o
- 1 S '. DO
— 3'ZO
- 13-. 4O
I4;DO- l4'T-O
- l4'4o
- IS- oo
~ ie>: ~LO
- m 4o
lU'-io - if. 40
- n •. oo
- IT. -2.0
- n.-4o
Average
Chart
Division
2 ~7
1 . &
2 &
2,^
3.0
3.0
3.O
2.1
2,3
2.t»
2.3>
2.8.
2. a
2.8
2.5
Concentration
PP^ ^
2 ,3
2.. 4
zM
Z,5
2.b
Z.b
z.t
2.3
2..0
2,2,
2.0
2.4
2.4
z.4
2.1
Comments
kuxi lAo, 1
1
For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:.
Date:
-------
f= GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
pl*nt: /VPfe. L.ME.
Location: o^^-r
Date: \o- 2.4- -
OF
Parameter: SQ2, C02, O2, NQx*.QiCjCO
Operator: P. <>\^tLv- _
Project #: S4-O1 .
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b)
m
(CD-1.583)
; Run
; *
i
Time" Average
T™ Chart
v ; , Division
I7;m- IT: v>
4.7
-IT. c,/^ ? ^
1
Concentration i
3.Z i
9 4 !
Comments
U.UKl Kit,. I
i
-iB'.zo 33 1,7
-ya.-so
x. ^_^,
^— -Tl ' [ JLj
- i
-------
CEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
MP.
Parameter: SOp. CO2,
Location: ftn-n-gT
Date: _ i o - 3.4 -
HOUSE Operator
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) (CD -1.562.)
= -^ - - - -
m
Run
#
Time**
(24-Hr)
v-oo - \y.ic>
- u'-4o
-\1\pO
- IT'.T-O
- |"L'. 4O
li'oo - \^•. 1.0
- 13-40
- 1 4 '• OD
-|4'.-2_o
-I4-.40
ISMD -IS1. 7,0
-IS' SO
-l^-. 0
-Ib'-30
-lU-.^O
Average
Chart
Division
^ ^
2.*>
£ -2,
2,2.
2 ,
M
2,2
Z,3
2,4-
— *tj — i
2.7
^
4.Z
3.9>
1.2.
3.7
Concentration
^^r tj,4-
/.D
V'l
0,1
O.L>
0.6
0.5
A,b
0.7
to A
1.2
/^
2.1
2.3
/x7
2.Z
Comments
i<,Jfcj Mo. I
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked Bv:
/
Date:
Date:
-------
-13 S.
: GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Parameter: SO2, CO2, 02. NOx*
-------
D0C3
CEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
.MP,
Plant: KP<^ [_
Location: |ML£-r -TO
Date: ID- 2-4 -<\k
Parameter
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) _ (CD-o.x-76)
m
(0.^545 )
Run
Time**
(24-Hr)
— u-. 4D
— VL-. DO
-\2'2-0
- IT.--40
ir.flB-IS'.l-D
- 13--4-0
- 14-- 00
-l4'.7.0
-l4'4o
Average
Chart
Division
2.0
.1
,-7
1.4
.3
.3
,t>
L_ -(o
I, -7
.9
Concentration
a
.5
.5
2.
^
1.4
.5
,1
Comments
K,,., sL
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
**
Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:
Checked Bv:
Date:.
Date:
-------
a £3 cza
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
Location:
Date: i
Parameter: SO2, CO2, O2. NOx*.(fHC^CO
Operator: /? j
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% = (Chart Division - b) _ (CD-I.
m (6/t
Run
#
Time**
(24-Hr)
/o:-46 - /i:o£
-//•• 25
//•'4O -/Z'oo
- / 2 •' 2. 0
'12-40
- 1 3 ' OO
-I2>:2.<9
l4'oo - i4'.2.o
- \4'40
~ 15: oo
- 15' 2.O
- 15'-4O
- llo'. OC
Average
Chart
Division
J.ft
4.6
-M
4M
4,5
4.5
4.5
3,7
2,4
2. 1
2 .3
2.D
5,5
Concentration
PP^ ,.^
2,fe
J.5
5,4
.^.4
3,5
3.5
.^..S
2.7
1,4
1 . /
1 .3
I .0
2.5
Comments
k,,.u MA.I
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2 , or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated Bv:
Checked Bv:
Date:
Date:
-------
30Q
a
GEM DATA REDUCTION - BAG ANALYSIS OR STEADY READINGS
Plant:
L.ME. /W
Location:
Date:
Parameter:
Operator:
Project #:
Pollutant, ppm/% =
(Chart Division - b) = _ (CD -fl
-- '
m
(0.^574 )
Run
#
Time**
(24-Hr)
/fi'4A -//'A<
1 U • l f-> 'I •V*? —
-//:zS
- 2.! 7.O
- 7.'. 4O
- 13'. 00
- I3>'. -2- O
l4:oo- 4'.2.<0
- 4:40
~ 5'. oa
- 15 '. 1O
-15 '.40
- \U'.oo
Average
Chart
Division
.3 6
3.7
3 ,9>
3. b
3, "7
3.3
3.-?
3,5
2,<9
.7
.6
•4
1
i.o
Concentration
PP^ ^^t
2. ^
3.5
3.U
V4
3.5
3,"b
3.5
J.3
.1
,4
,5
. 1
2.1
Comments
^lUJ NA. L
* For NOX Indicate whether NO, NO + NO2, or NO2 for specific interval.
** Indicate whether time interval is from beginning of first time to beginning
of second time or to end of second time (circle one, or describe alternate).
Calculated By:.
Checked By:_
Date:.
Date:
-------
0J
t=t=±-4-
3iB
-~L-li
; L
1 o
i
i j
rrr
I r
+4-Hf
-i-
..., -. _ j_
-\'%-
i i
33
tin
ii
<
~n
W
JEi
-------
-------
i
:f !
iP
-f-T-f f-^-f-T-f
'i-
44 ; i
_L_( . ^.... . ...|
-Jl 1 '
V i
>
J f.50
>i i . , . .
! 1 ! ^
1 J 1 ,
•
j
•
^flt
i
.!..!.! 1 i
i ; ! i
.... _...! ....L. _j - _
! :
i i
I 1 U- i - --
! jj
r * oi :
• t\
^\
-------
9
f
6fai
1
' JtJJ
if
p i
\5'-SO •
I'M
4ft AA
-------
0-S ______ 1 __________ 2 _________ 3 __ T __ 4 _________ 5 --------- 8 -------- fl'
t
-9-
I ! : L _
J I L-.
r~ i 1 . i
-------
1
J-
:
: :
\V-2-0
1 '
— 1 <
[
> : !
j
r
n
c
c
1
—
f
1 [
1
L --
8 — -3
; i
j i
1 I
i |
...J_--i-J—-1 —[Li
i
i i i
._; i. i. j i j
I I
1.
\i -.1.0
-------
i i
: . -i, \ .
._T
-I—L
\VAO --!-
-
j L__L
j i
M-M---1-:-!-
\Y.V> t...._;.___
T--f
) i
\\'.QO I
^
I
I
F
-------
-------
-------
t-
-------
>
$
i
i I
t
i
!
:
QUTU.'
1
r
u
i « n i
: !
i ;
i i
I i
i !
1 •
1
i
U
i
i
• \ :>
t i f^-
LW L .._^._-i
: 1
, !
1. 1
— I-AA fsr« i. — ' - -
^ni.
-------
It
-f. -(*- -'«
[1-5
! I I.
\'f'
—tt—r
-
-------
j— -
._ ^
^ ?- j
:. ..j .. '. 1
^ 3 lt>'^f :!
-------
Sl,j&fa
rOl'.'l.S jUl&£t
' i i
OUTLET e>
! 1
n h b
d B g
1 1 ;
: i
i — i^ —
Pi fck^tJ
L !
— t — ' — i
i
y :
OflXiTtOKj' . , , i . 1 ; ,
^oos£ ! i ; __;
? ! \ ' i ' 8' i 2 1
P & ; f 3o,o4
-e-
87186"
!\
I
—h_
^
-H-
-J
4-
— IS: 60
j •
— - !•• — • ----
^H—f—I-
I
TT
I i
—1—
_. 1—f—
-------
1
_j ! _._!
•rA e-r i i
A/4ET
T
I--:—-i--v i-J-i
J._l_.
LLJ
-f-
I
1—T
J
i
i
\ '' \ ' 1 "i fi 7 fl 9 : 10
I ' i ' ! 1 • i ! !
! : 1 i ! i : i
-------
-------
I ;
4...
\ M t
f-
r
I T' ' " t" ; 1 " " * I '
t-
UL
j4i2Qc«
TUT
-------
-3 4 *-
4 &-
* 14-
IV.10
Hi i40cn
T"
-------
i4n60ca
SlTier
L\liLDat
i
r_.
4 1
1J
-------
l4i80cn
L
:t=L-..F i...-fr
1
___ I_
£H>
r6*ff+*4. P
*4. PL. 1 tVW
^z
if^
I'.30
—h-^-j-
~T-h-
—4.
_J L.
»—H
-^
-------
Appendix B.I.4
Raw Field Data
Kiln No. 1 Visible Emissions
-------
*y
:•, .•*! *
m
VISIBLE EMISSIONS
EVALUATOR
This f toriify that
met the specifications of Federal -Reference Method 9 and qualified as a visible
emissions evaluator. Maximum, d^iatiojrt,fan!white and black smoke did not exceed
7.5% opacity and no sing^:'.0'i^^^^ei^^^^^^pa^ity-,,was incurred during the
certification test conducted'byj;Eastern^ of Raleigh, North
'omdate of issue.
Carolina. This certificate^^'
7X
/^""^W^v^
Pteddcn
j"1.
•«••)'
/^Hrte*]
C«r«|laite Number
LocaUon
4Jt»±ly\o*
September 26,1996
Program Manager
Date of Issue
f^'JSg-t
LfTHO.IN U.S.A.
-------
Congratulations.
Here is the wallet card signifying your successful Visible Emissions Evaluator certification on the date printed below. This certil
cation is valid for six (6) months. To maintain continuous certification, you must recertify before or on the expiration date. Pleas
mark your calendar accordingly. We appreciate your business and look forward to serving your certification needs in the futur
ETA can support your program with a wide range of em
ronmental services from measurement to litigation suppo
Please give us a call if we can be of service.
EASTERN TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES
CERTIFIES THAT j
PAUL GRABLE
ol the specifications of Federal Reference Method 9 end quelrfie* •• • wtwble •millions eveki*tor.
aiimum deviation on white and bUck «rtoV» did not «c»*d 7.9% opacity and no wngl* •rrar
tceeding 15% optcly was incurred during lh» certification tee) conducted by Eedem Technical
Sep 26, 1996
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING
255264
DATE OF SCHOOL
DIRECTOR OF TRAINING
PROGRAM MANAGER/
CERTIFICATE NUMBER
Mar 28, 1997
BEARER
EXPIRATION DATE
EASTERN TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES
P.O. BOX 58495
RALEIGH, NC 27658
(919) 878-3188
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Form Number
Company Name
FodUtyName
K'A LL7Z> V
Street Address
f> "3s
State
Pieces
IContrdEaJpment
Descdbe Emission Point
Urtt*
Operating Mode
Operattrg Mode
Height of Emte.Pt.
Start
End
Distance to Ernfss. Pt.
Start End
Height of Erriss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Stat End
Direction to Ernlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Vertical Angte to Ots. n. D
Start End St
rectlon to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
art End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Errtsston Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emfeskxi Cotof v>
Start End A
Describe Plume Background
Start >8 <•***" -f«X tel-frl -f SI
Ambient Temp. , V
Start 6flT End fs> «
Source Loyo
X
(^Observatloi
..Observer-si
" >7v5f sun Location Une
Longrtude Latitude
tater Droplet Phjne i
ttoched [Zl Detached CD None 0
g *>«r> 1**** a****
cyCondtlons
art End
/Ind Direction
art AJ End jJ
M BJb Temp. RH Percent
utSketch DrawNorthArrow
DTN QMN
n Point
\
fit -**-** n
9S<=> FEET
'osttlon s
0
O
0
4
0
o
o
0
&
o
o
0
o
0
o
V
n
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
15
o
0
&
<3
c?
0
0
o
^>
0
£,
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
D
o
Time Zone
30
O
o
0
0
o
&
o
o
o
0
o
£>
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
45
0
o
0
#
&
o
0
0
o
o
6
o
6
0
o
3
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
Start Time End Time
//•'-&^/y /st.:fO P^\
Convrwits
3t>Wer /+*&7?^S/77
,e&:S'*
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
MeJbeeHtedXOrcle One)
\__Method?|7 203A 2038 Other
Form Number
4
p
^
n
i
Pooe ~ S? ^
o2 o^-
Continued on VEO Form Number
Observafl
on Date
ImeZone
artTlme
End Time
CcmpcnyName
^)^
FodltyName
/C/W3*t-i--rvu S^&T
Street Address
STATS' /Qourrg' ^,3^
atv
/e/^°^>->-e7^D
Process
Control EojJpment
State Zip
US) <24 <-?&
Unit* Operarna Mode
Operating Mode
Descrtbe Embston Point
Height of Errtss. Pt.
Start End
Distance to Errfcs. Pt.
Start End
Vertlcd Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Emiss. Pt. Pel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emiss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start
Emission Color
Start End
Describe Plane Background
Start
Background Color
Start End
VWnd Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
Source
X Obse
.,Obse(
^^•'^ ^-140"^
End
Water Droplet PKme
Attached 1 1 Detached C~l Nonf> 1 |
End
Sky Conditions
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet BJb Temp. RH Percent
Layout Sketch CtovNorth Arrow
DTN QMN
O
rvatl on Point
HA fsr
II n
F!¥I I
ve^s Position saeView
-^ Stock _,
^^->^ With Q~_
-—^_^^ Pkme
^^~-^ Sun -&•
Sen Location Una
Wind i>.
Lonoltude Latitude
Declination,
«7
Adcitiond InfofmatiorT
Observation Date
&,r*i* ft
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
n
o
0
o
o
a
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
0
O
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
&
0
o
o
0
lime Zone
f%2£7'
30
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
-f
o
t>
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
-£>
o
o
45
n
o
o
o
fj
0
0
Q
0
o
D
0
0
D
b
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
£>
t>
0
artUme Endllme
/-?.\2^ >c3;50
Comments
St7W)Utyt£& ^T^^J
^"% -£>ZT$e/yg.
I
GTtfPfb To /VffKiT/fftJ
'G/3tSe4.iX'£.'_f fixfilt&j
Observer's Name (Print)
organization
Date
tlfledBy
oate
VEOF1.1
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Form Number
jarcteOoe)
2D3A
2038
Other
CompenyNerne
FodUlyName
State
ap
Process
Unit*
Operating Mods
Control EqJpment
Ope ratlno Mode
Describe Emission Point
^jffsejz ^/.ztte^ /3/&&£>»£E' ^r^Af
Height of Errtss.Pt.
Start *- /'£)£? /^ End //^> /^T
DHoncetoEmlss.PI. x
Start ^<5£> " End V^?
Height of Embs. Pt. Rel.to Observer
Start «2o £J~ End (2-0 ^T
Direction to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start l^jfJT End D&ST
Vertical Anaje to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emtetan Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached CD Detached HI! NoneO
Describe PUne Background
start Moi**sr*)/*J ^mt ?*£& t-*A*4t •
Backaratnd Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start A*«^/SJ(/End Udt/A&^t
Ambient Temp. .
Start ^tf/^ End ,{/&*£
Sky Condrrtons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start ^6<*rn End <5
•0
0
o
0
o
0
S
o
0
o
o
0
D
0
o
o
-f
~s
&
S
o
D
0
45
0
0
O
f
o
0
£
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
£
o
o
r>
o
o
0
*s
-£-
5
0
0
0
o
Startflme End Time
/^.'-S^PAi /^:^9
Gornrtwnti
/f£S*>3/s>"V£7> 7Z>
/iscr*f c*€s*^» i / (? f/
te&Tx*^^
££3$ TJ/JV) $-
<££SS 7?S/t4j 4?
J.&S3 -7&/4AS ^5
sLe&Z. Tf**J-S
JJS&trtZSy ZJ£!ZS ^
Observer's Signature
Organization'
Certified By
ra?
T5ate~
VEOF1.1
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
IM
I
(OrcteOne)
" 203A
20QB
Other
Company Nome
FacUtyName
/f ' n*-*0/)4L'7£>L=> FUA&T
Street Address
S7s97Z~ x€to
C"* ^7
Process
Control Equipment
^Tt. <£3^
1//Q £y)~5L?
Unit* Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Errtss. Pt.
Start End
Distance to Emlss. Pt.
Start End
Vertical Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Errtss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
{Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
IStart End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start
Emission Color
Start End
Describe Plane Background
Start
Background Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
Source
XObse
.^Obsei
End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached CD Detached CD None CD
End
Sky Conations
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp. RH Percent
Layout Sketch Draw North Arrow
QTN n^N
O
rvatlon Point
fU «fi
III n
fEFT
rver's PosHlon SjoeVKw
•^ Stack _
^^^. wnh Q ~_
^^^^ Pkine —
Sun Location One
Wind v,.
Longitude Latitude
Declination
VEOF1.1
Form Number
-
Continued on VEOFoimNLiWber
O
03-
4±
Observation Dote
£7£T <
Sec
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
O
o
o
o
o
o
0
5"
5-
O
O
o
15
0
o
o
O
O
O
S
J"
0
O
o
o
s
s
6
S
0
o
0
o o
meZooe
30
o
O
0
o
0
s
O
o
5
s
s
O
0
S
0
n.
o
0
s
5
O
0
0
.S"
o
0
0
0
EndTlme
Comment!
Less.
Jrganbarlor
Date
bate
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
rde One)
Metnod> 2D3A
2036 Other
Company Nome
FodWyNome
Street Address
Oty
State
UA
Pieces
Unit*
Control EqUpment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
HeightofErrte.pt.
Start End
Distance to Embs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Errtss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Embs. R. (Degrees)
Start End
Vertical Angte to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Distmce end Direction to Observation Point 1
Start
Direction to Obs. R. (Degrees)
Start End
Fom Emission Point
End
Describe Emissions
Start
Emission Cotor
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Rune
Attached [H Detached D
None CD
Describe Pkxne Background
Start End
Background Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
Sky Condtlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start
Wet BJb Temp.
End
RH Percent
Aaaitlonal Information
VEOF1.1
Form Number
3
Continued on VtO Form Number
Observation Date
Sec
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
5
0
V
D
0
0
0
0
D
-D
O
0
o
.D
15
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
D
O
0
D
0
rime Zone
Start Time
30
o
o
0
o
0
0
5
o
o
0
0
o
5
0
o
0
o
0
O
O
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
©-
D
0
0
c
0
V
o
End Time
Observer's Name (Print)1
Obsei
Z?.
Convraots
Organlzattdf
TSate-
Certified By
Date
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
MelttosLUsacUQfde
("Method?)
One)
203A
2038
Other.
ComporvNome
FocUtyNome
Street Address
atT
State
Process
urit*
Control Equipment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Errtss. PI.
Start End
Dtetcnce to Emfcs. PI.
Start End
Height of Emlss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
VertlcalAnaJetoObs.Pt. prectton to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point tram Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droptet Pkrne
Attached C3 Detarhed ( 1
Nonel |
Describe Pkroe Background
Start End
Background Col or
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
SkyCondtlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp.
RH Percent
Addtional Wormatlon
Form Number
A
p
^
o
-j
Paoevf
Continued on VEO Form Number
^X-?2>
Ll
bserver's Nar*e (Print)
Observers Slgr
OroantzattorT
Observation Dote
&CT 2ZL %
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
A
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•>
0
0
o
o
o
0
D
15
h
n
0
0
n
o
rime Zone
&T2ST
30
0
0
[7
O
ft
O
45
0
0
n
0
0
D
artTlme Ehd,1//', // S
Mtijc) J *•'?•*
.. Commenta
^trpyftTfp A/^n
^•/CZD c?s^^ewrr/i?x^
ijJltrLer /&&££s
$fr/r*r&D^
**./!&
VEOF1.1
uate
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Form Number
Continued on VEO Foim Number
Page
Of
MethojiUteatPrcle
(Method^
One)
2D3A
2038
Other:
StreetAddress __
/?£>
State
Zip
Operatlno Mode
Control EQJpment
Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Errtss.Pt.
'
Distance to Emlss.Pt.
Start End
End
Height of Erriss. Pt. Pel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
VerttcdAn09toObs.pt.
Start End
prectlontoOb8.pt. (Degrees)
Istort End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Sort End
Describe ErrtsSore
Start
Emission Color
Start
End
Droplet Plane
Attached CD Detached O None CD
Describe Pk-me Bockgroind
Start
Mind Speed
Start
End
Ambient TemPi,
Start
End
End
Wind Direction
Start *J
End
Wet 6Jb Temp.
RH Percent
airionai Information
VEOFl.l
ObmtvcrUon Date
10
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
X
26
27
28
29
30
(9
o
sS"
O
IS
o
o
o
o
o
o
rime Zone
Start Time
30
O
D
0
O
5
c?
D
O
V
o
£7
O
o
o
End Time
Comments
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Form Number
-r
v
^
A
Continued on VEO Form Number
3
pog5 -j~ ^~;
3 &f~ ^
r"^
:?
MethosLUsoliarcle One)
^"MethodJ/ 2D3A 203B Other
tfwnpu iy Nome ^
"Ocuty Nome
Street Address
& / rt <^i /^f <-f Le
Ctty
Process
£3^
aate^/i *P3Jit£&
Unit* Operating Mode
Control Equipment Operattng Mode
Descrtbe Emteton Point
Height ot Srriss. Pt.
Start End
Distance to Embs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Erriss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emte. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Vertical Angle to Obs. Pt. I Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End Istart End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Errtoi ore
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plane
Attached CH Detached d None CD
Describe Plume Background
Start End
Background Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
SkyCondtlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp. RH Percent
Observation Dote
/0/fL.K /$ L
S^
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
n
n
C7
A
r>
r>
n
o
n
V
r>
n
o
O
0
o
o
o
&
0
0
0
O
Q
is
S)
O
o
n
o
c>
D
T>
o
O
*s
0
o
o
rt
o
o
o
o
o
0
p
D
o
o
0
o
o
o
D
ImeZone
j£Z>£"J~
30
/)
O
0
n
0
n
a
0
o
0
*<$
o
o
o -
D
o
0
D
O
O
&
n
o
t>
o
o
0
&
0
o
45
o
0
o
D
f)
p
n
0
0
0
0
o
O
0
o
o
D
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
a
&
o
o
artTlme - (End Time
s*.'J9
Comrwnte
*<*%
')
\
1
/
.dcitiond Information
VEOF1.1
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Fonn Number
MelhgOUsaiyCircte One)
QJethodT) 203A
2038
Other
Company Nome
FodltyName
StraetAddcess
dty
State
Zip
Process
Unit*
Operating Mode
Control EqJpment
Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
HelghtotEmlss.pt.
Start End
Height of Erriss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
DlstoncetoEmlss.pt.
Start End
Direction to Emtes. PI. (Degrees)
Start End
Vertlcd Ange to Ota. Pt.
9ot End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Istort End
DMcnce and Direction to Observation point from Emtakxi Point
3at fcd
Descilbe Emission!
Star)
Emission Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Pkme
Attached CH Detached CH None [H
Descilbe Pkjme Background
Start End
Backoroind Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
SkyCondrHons
Start End
Wind Drectlon
Start
Wet BJb Temp.
End
RH Percent
tormatlon
VEOF1.1
Continued on VEOFoimNunber
£? 3
Organization
>^
0
&
0
o
<3
o
o
0
o
£
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
45
0
o
0
O
o
0
o
£?
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
<7
0
Q
o
O
O
D
0
%
O
Start Time End Time
/£."#
Commnls
r-s
'<52
DatT
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Method Used (arete One)
CMetiiodT? 203A 203B Other
Company Name -.
/f/^g- t->t*-t£ C&fcpCuQ-ATl'O*-'
FacUtyName
Street Address
Oty
xf / JZJpjjEfijerjftp
Process
**L>/^ ^V <-£"£?
Unit* Operating Mode
Control Equipment Operating Mode
Describe Errtsston Point
Height otErriss.Pt.
Start End
DlsJcncetoEmlss.pl.
Start End
Height of Erriss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Vertical Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
I Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
IStart End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from EmUon Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached CH Detached C
Noneljd
Describe Flume Background
Start End
Background Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
Sky Conditions
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp.
RH Percent
^ <*w.
Sunlo<5dt!onUne
Aodflond Information
Rxm Number
4 P
6 & 3
***> v « jr-
Continued on VEOFoim Number
,0/y/C' 03 5 xj ±
Observation Dote
/C/SLZ-/' ?£
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
&
0
o
D
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
p
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
f)
0
o
15
/o
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
f?
0
o
0
*5
o
o
0
o
0
^
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
D
lime Zone
iSDST
30
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
Q
f?
D
0
O
0
'5
tf
O
/9
<9
O
O
£>
0
0
<9
<9
O
0
O
O
45
O
o
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
Q
0
0
D
0
0
o
0
(9
O
0
0
O
^%
ooeervers Name (Pnnt)
Observers Stgr
Z?.
Orgcrizafon
VEOF1.1
Date
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Foim Number
^TvT
Of
Continued on VEO Form Number
rote One)
Method 9> 203A
203B Other.
Company Nome
FcdhyNane'
STnet Address
State
Process
Control Equipment
(So
Ope rating Mode
Operating Mode
DeKilbe Errtsion Polnf
HelghtdEnnte.Pt.
Slat End
DbtaxetoEmlss.pt.
Start End
*rtlcd Antfe to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Erriss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emte. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Dtstcrce end Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Descrtbe Emissions
Start End
Emission Cotor
Start End
Water Droplet Plcme
Attached CD Detached CD None CD
Describe Plume Background
Start End
Background Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
Sky Conditions
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet BUb Temp.
RH Percent
ASdHoodWormcrHon
VEOF1.1
bservation Date
Sec
10
12
13
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
o
0
o
15
0
0
5S
time Zone
30
0
0
0
0
art Time
End Time
Comfranti
fjPrVjja^
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
I Method Used (Qrde One)
(jtethodg^) 203A
2038
Other.
Company Name
FadUtyName
Street Address
CHy
Process
Control EqUpment
LHt*
OperatlrQ Mode
OperaHrg Mode
Descilbe Errtsston Point
/=??:
HelohtotErriss.Pt.
Start /"^ End
Height of Eniss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start <*& End
Distance to Emiss. Pt.
Start /5"/9 End
Verttcd Antfe to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Descitbe Emissions
Start
Emission Color
End
Water Droplet Plane
Attached D Detached CD NonefM
Describe Plune Background
0/°
Background Color
Start yu> End
SkyCondttons
Wind Speed
Start /0~- ££ End /£>
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
Wind Direction
Start
End
Wet BUb Temp.
RH Percent
ddtlonoj Inlormatton
VEOF1.1
Form Number
J
P
*»
„
y
Page x
Continued on VEO Form Number —fc~
X-
5
bservation Dote
[me Zone
10
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
\
o
o
o
o
o
O
O
15
fl
o
o
0
O
0
S
n
o
30
O
&_
0
0 -
V
O
O
0
o
45
O
0
o
O
art Time "
&."/£ fa
Observer's Name (Print)
Observer's S
Organlzatlor
Certified ty
Commenb
155?
Date
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
ComponyNome
FodHyNome
Street Address
2038 Other.
Oty
Stole
Pieces
p
Operating Mode
Control Equipment
Operating Mode
Describe Emteton Point
Height o( Emlss.Pt.
Stat End
KSancetoEmte.pt.
Start End
Height ot Emtss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Milled Angle to Obs.Pt. (Direction to Obt Pt. (Degrees)
Stat End Istart End
Ostonce and Dlrectksn to Observation Point from Emteton Point
Start End
Describe Entedons
Stat End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plune
Attached | 1 DatachBH | 1 Nona ^~|
Descitbe FVme Bockgroind
Start End
Background Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambent Temp.
Start
End
End
End
Sky Conditions
Start End
\MndDlrectlon
Start
Wet EvJb Temp.
End
RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
Draw North Arrow
DIN
X Observation Point
Observer's Position
-FEI
_n
Sin location Une
Longitude
Latitude
Stack
With
Rume
an
Wind
Declination
Aacitlonal Information
VEOF1.1
Foim Number
# r
Continued on VEO Foim Nimber
s amo n)
Oroontzotlorr
S&ts
Certified by
Observation Date
^/®3/f^
\S*c
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
IS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
f?
£>
0
&
&
&
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
o
0
0
o
0
&
o
£>
o
&
s
o
D
&
&
ft
n
&
o
0
6
o
time Zone
GST
30
o
tf
o
O
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
1}
0
f)
o
6
O
o
£>
O
•o
ft
t>
6
6
O
0
O
45
f>
0
O
0
0
£>
O
0
0
0
'10
p
0
0
o
0
tf
0
O
£>
fy
rt
$
6
O
O
O
0
O
O
Start Time , .,,,. End Time
///X//v
Comnwrrti
Date
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM ]
Method Lt«d (Oide One)
203A
2038
Other
Company Name
FodWty Name
>£:/•«-* 73 jrl.LL.TOAJ T^AAJ/
Street Address
sJ^STf 'Coi.cTE. X»5
aty
/^r Tf 'LSTf-^lETn^
Process
State ^^ *2V<^e?
Unit* Operating Mode
Control Equipment Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Emiss. Pt.
Start End
Distance to Emiss. PI.
Start End
Height of Emiss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emiss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
vertical Angle to Obs. Pt. (Direction to Obs. PI. (Degrees)
Start End Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plume
Aftnrhorl 1 | Datrv~h«H 1 | None 1
Describe Plume Background
Start End
Background Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
SkyCondtlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp. RH Percent
Addtfonol Intormatlon
Form Number
A
P
Cr
0
V
Page ^ ~&~(
Continued on VEO Form Number ji Jf
jey/04' A H *r 03 *>
7
bsorvotion Dot 6
/0/*J3/9(,
\S8C
MtTx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
T)
P
O
n
P
(}
n
(0
n
n
S
ft
n
o
o
t>
o
0
(9
/ ^
o
0
ft
o
0
o
M
-o
o
0
o
15
O
h
O
T)
0
n
n
0
n
0
0
6
O
o
o
0
b
o
D
o
0
o
O
6
o
•O
o
o
o
o
HmeZone
JSZ&T
30
o
r>
n
n
0
o
0
to
0
o
6
D
O
o
o
o
o
0
0
D
0
O
O
0
O
0
O
o
o
o
45
0
r>
P
n
n
0
O
0
o
O
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
h
0
0
n
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
c?
art Time,,, (End Time
y/.'Vk
Commente
Observers Name (Print)
Observer's Stgnah
Organtzaftof
Certified By
Eafi
VEOF1.1
T53e-
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
203A
2038
Other
CanponyNome
FodltyNome
Street Address
Oty
Zip
Dasctoe Emission Point
Process
Control Equipment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
H /? I
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
o
0
0
0
0
O
&
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
-o
o
&
0
a
o
0
*r
0
0
o
p
0
IS
0
0
0
D
O
0
O
O
O
0
o
0
&
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
s
o
0
0
0
[me Zone
e7?£-r
30
IP
o
0
o
&
o
o
&
O
O
O
o
ft
O
O
0
0
0
O
o
&
O
0
5-
0
£
o
0
o
/)
45
0
^
0
0
&
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
a
o
0
&
o
£
p
^
0
o
o
0
SortTlme /^/Vl I End Time
J3L'lL*J*AB*
..___!• j rwu
Convnsnti
'
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
MettocUkadXQrde One)
{Method9J> 2O3A 203B Other
Company Nome
Ctty
Process
Control Equipment
if^LE' CGrQ.
T»^ 7>l-»
TS 4^^
/ \ jT\
?s
€
n
jG-ffG*}
S&^
"i^/^
Unit* Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Errtsston Point
Height of Erriss. Pt.
Start End
DtetancetoEmlss.pt.
Start End
vertical Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Errtss. Pt.
Start
Rel. to Observer
End
Direction to Emiss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
IDIrectton to Obs. Pt. (Degrees}
Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start
Emission Color
Start End
Describe Plume Background
Start
Background Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
Source
XObse
jkS**®
^ ^^140"-^
End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached CD Detached CD None CD
End
Sky Condtlons
Start
Wind Direction
Start
End
End
Wet Bulb Temp.
Layout Sketch
rvatlon Point
Tver's Position
^
RH Percent
Draw North Arrow
QTN OIN
o
II
~-^
[
Sun Location Une
Lonoitude Latitude
cm
n
SideVnw
Stack _ •
With QZ
Hume
an -0-
Wind ^
Declination
Form Number
/
9
P
(r-
t
-> ^
»age^ & ^
O O
tonthued on vfo (Wi Number
DbservottonDcrte
\Sec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
^
n
n
0
0
0
O
(•)
n
n
o
o
o
0
15
r>
r>
o
0
n
0
o
n
o
o
0
o
0
V
ImeZone
30
n
0
o
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
o
0
O
O
n
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
attTlme EndTtne
/a. • y& /ffl /ia' •' '
Comments
tSTV/TtztJT- /JSS?
*Jj ^JSis^j&si. JI\/£-
Observer's Nome (Print) ^~
Observer's Signature ^~
S^Zt+J
Organization
Certified By
^&!&2#,
&/JLU
WZ2-*
f S) M /4 Date , ,a/>s
&^ZL4M <5£r<3-3 , /?9<£
'->&*&U. 4&r. ^ttefTi^ $£
VEOF1.1
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Form Number
/.
o
*
&
£
"""• / "^
Continued on VEOFonn Number
/V'/f-ot. 3 ~t£
2038
Other.
Canpany Name
FadUlyNarra
Street Address
=tocess
Control Equipment
Describe ErrtsstonPoInt
Zip
Unit*
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
H«4ohto(Emiss. Pt.
Start Xg>g X End
DMoncetoEmlss.pt.
Start <5^ End
Height of Emiss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Verttcd Antfe to Obs. Pt.
Sort End
Dtsttnce and Direction to Observation Point
Start
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
rom Emission Potnt
End
Descitbe Emissions
Sort
Emission Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Pkjne
Attached d Detached CD
NoneC]
Describe Plane Background
Bacground CdOf
Start J/*"t*-ai*> End
Sky Condtlons
Start 731.1* &
Wnd Speed
Start 5 -
Wind Direction
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
Wet BJb Temp.
RH Percent
Addtlond Information
VEOFl 1
Organization
^2?<-s,
Certified BY
Observation Date ....
0t.T. J.3 ,17'*'
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
A
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
0,
0
0
<9
£>
6)
O
O
O
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
/o
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
15
<^
<^
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
<9
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
O
0
£>
0
£
O
0
O
0
o
o
o
0
"g&r
30
Q
0
O
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
ft
o
o .
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
45
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
£>
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
Start Time End Time
/3f*y
ConYnonte
'7&sr&t>*'j4#5^f+'f* -
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
3 One)
Q_MethodJ7 203A
2038
Other.
Company Name
^^ T^^" ^f^i£ &>f^b&rfrTs<5lP
FacUtyName
/^»»«-f73«i-cr^>
o
o
o
n
0
0
o
o
O
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
a
15
n
^
r>
n
0
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
£)
o
o
o
6
rime Zone
30
^
n
n
n
^
O
n
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
&
45
ft
n
0
r>
0
o
o
0
n
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
•y!SW &K'mie
Comments
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Form Number
Method used (Circle One)
(^ethod 9^7 2°^ <&& Other
Company Ncme
— X^X6^- £/iA->S~ OeveP<3/e.»47>*J>A^
FodUtyName
A'/iV73^arr^o Fj.rt+?r
Sheet Address
3T^7T" ^o^-o? k^S-
dty
sejFpjjr-nffyte
Process
Stare Zip
I/A <2V '5o
Unit* Operating Mode
Control Equipment Operatlno Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Erriss. Pt.
Start End
DUoncetoEmte.Pt.
Start End
Height of Errtss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Verted Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Distance end Direction to Observation Point trom Embston Point
Slat End
Describe Emissions
Start
Emission Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached d Detached CD None CD
Describe Plume Background
Start End
Background Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
Sky Condtlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet BUb Temp.
RH Percent
-
Continued on VEO Form Number
Observation Date
/<> /£&;<*£,
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
t>
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
U
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
D
0
0
0
0
o
0
(9
(9
0
0
O
O
0
<9
0
0
<9
O
0
O
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
15
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
d
0
o
(9
6
o
0
0
<9
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
line Zone
^£>£T
30
0
o
o
o
0
0
c>
o
0
<9
o
0
0
o
s
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
"0
0
o
o
45
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
o
(9
O
Q
o
f)
0
0
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
Start TVne End Time
/y.- ff
Convnonts
Organization
X^
Certified By
[Bate-
Date
VEOFl.l
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Methodjiaixarcte One)
CMethod£> 203A 203B Other
Company Name .
S^f&- 4—lt>-i& £-£>s4.Ty0*QA'rst>}s
FacUtyName
Street Addreo
aty
'^f^^^i-^'t^fyfT^
Process
State 2p ^f
Unit* Operating Mode
Control EqJpment Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Errtss. Pt.
Start End
DlstancetoEmlss.pt.
Start End
Height of Emlss. Pt. Ret. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Vertical Antfe to Obs. Pt. IDIreclton to Obs. Pt. CDegrees)
Start End Istart End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached CD Detached [~1 None 1 1
Describe Plcme Background
Start End
BockgroLnd Color
Start End
Wnd Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
Sky Condrflons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet BUb Temp. RH Percent
Addllooal Intormatton
FormNLmber
j
4
o
o
n
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
o
Q
o
0
o
ft
D
O
o
0
0
0
o
o
15
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
n
o
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
*5
O
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
) k
**»t, " s-
f-
ilme Zone
30
0
0
o
0
o
ft
o
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
O
O
*S
O
0
o
o
o
0
o
Q
O
45
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
D
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
-o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
ortTfrne ., [End Time
/5V//
Comments
\
*<^
Observer's Name (Print)
1555-
CerttftedBy
VEOF1.1
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
JClrcle One)
^Method?) 203A
20BB
Other
Company Nome
FodltyName
Street Address
State
tocos
Descdbe tnisskxi Point
HelQhtofErrtss.Pt.
Start
Unit*
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
End
OfetcrcetoErrte.pt.
Sat End
Height o» Errtss.Pt. Rel. to Observer
StCTt End
Dlrectkxi to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
\teittcd Anflje to OtsTPt.
Sart End
IDIfectlon to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Istart End
Daance and Direcaon to Observation Point f
Sort _
Emission Point
Describe Emtaloru
Color
Start
End
iir Droplet Pkme
tttv-hftd I Patoehed I I Norm
Describe Rune Background
Start End
Badigrocnd Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
AmHentTemp.
Start
End
End
End
Sky Condtlons
Start End
Wnd Direction
Start End
Wet BUb Temp.
RH Percent
*3dilond Wormaflon
VEOF1.1
FormNLfnber
D
Continued on VEO FOOD
Observation Date
0/&S1L
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
0
O
15
O
O
0
Time Zone
Zi>f7
30
6
O
45
0
0
Start Time EndUme-
/^->y /*.-*£
CofTvrwnb
/£"•'?£ 72^7 cfW/te^fje*
s*vz> &* c&T ,,
^A
Observer's Name (Prin
Observer's Signal!
IDafe~
Organization
*
Certified By
Date
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
2038
Other
Company Name
FadttyName
Street Address
City
State
Proces
Control Equipment
Operating Mode
CperatlnoMode
Describe EmMon Point
HeightofErrtss.Pt.
Stort /.£>£ End
Distance to Emiss, PI.
Start X^S? End
Height otEmtas.Pt.Rel. to Observer
Start t££> ' End.2-Z>
Direction to Embs. PI. (Degrees)
Start End
Vert1cdAnOe1oOb5.Pt.
Start fO * End
Distance and Dtrectlon to Observation Point from Errtsston PoW
Start 'S0 End S
Describe ErrbSoos
Sfart
Emission Color
Start
precHon to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Istart 3S2&>" End
End
End
Water Droplet Plume /
Attoehsd 1 1 Detached 1 1 l*xv> (71
Describe Plume Background
Start
*<*
Background Color
Wnd Speed
Start «3 -3/VWEnd
Ambient Temp.
CondMons ^^ f S*>y
Wind Direction
Start *
End
Wet Bulb Temp.
RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
Draw North
Observation Point
Observer's Position
_n
Longitude
Lattrude
Stock
With
Pkrne
Sun
Wind
DecNnation
AocSHond Intormatlon
VEOF1.1
Form Number
<#-€?
Continued on VEO Form Number
Observation Date
*£f~f2? /£%
\Sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
IS
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
o
o
o
rt
ft
O
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
O
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
15
<7
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
ImeZane
jfZ?57~
30
0
D
0
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
45
^7
0
0
ft
0
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
o
at Time " EndTlme
/0;S?AM
Comments
5??**r
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
One)
91 203A
2038
Other
Compaq Name
FodltyNome
Street Addren
ST&TS
Procea
Untt#
Control Equipment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Emtaion PoW
HoJQht of Ernes. Pt.
Slat
Distance to Emte.Pt.
Start
End
End
\tertlca An0e to Otn.Pt.
Start End
DWonce and Direction to Observation Point
Start
Height of Emte. Pt. Rel. to Obteivet
Start End
Direction to Emte. Pt. (Degree*)
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
ix* ii Eiiu^on Puh tl
End
Descdbe Errtetors
Start End
EmUonCokx
Start End
Water Droplet Pkme
Attached CD Detached CD
None CD
Describe Ptme Backgrrxfxj
Start End
CadcoroLDd Color
Start
Who Speed
Start
/vnuent Temp.
Start
End
End
End
SkyCondmons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet BUb Temp.
RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
Draw/North Arrow
X Observation PoW
Observer-j Position
-FIB
n
SO.VW
Une
Longitude
Latitude
Stack
With
fVme
Wind
Declnallon
AMtlcfid Wormatico
VEOF1.1
wo-
a
Continued on tO Focn Nimber
Observation Date
'*/n-y
\sec
Mn\
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
a
o
0
0
o
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
15
o
o
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
rime Zone
STXT
30
O
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
0
0
D
0
O
O
Q
O
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
45
O
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
at Hm« ATT-v EndTlme
//.•cfrer/42£'
COfTfTWltS
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
2038
Other
FodttyNome
Sheet Addrae.
Oty
Stole
Piece
Deacdbe Emtakxi PcW
OpeicdtnQ Mooe
Opeiotlng Mode
Height otEmte.Pt.
Start
End
Dbtcrce to Emte. Pt.
Start End
Heigh* ot Errtss. Pt. Rel. to Ctxwvef
Stort frid
Dtroctton to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Stort End
Vertical Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point t
Start
Direction to ObL Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
rom Emtakxi Port
End
Describe EmWorn
Stort
Emtalon Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Pkjne
Attached CD Detached CD
None CD
Describe Pkjne Background
Start End
Backgroaxl Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
SkyCondrUons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp.
RH Percent
Addliood Intormatlon
VEOF1.1
Observer's Name (Print)
Observer^
Observation Dote
\*«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
O
n
o
n
o
o
n
n
0
O
r>
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
0
15
o
0
f)
o
cr
n
n
0
o
o
n
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
kneZone
ffbfT
30
O
n
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
T)
o
o
0
0
o
Q
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
45
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
art Time EndTkne
Commenti
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Foim Number
203B
Other
Company Name
FocMyName
StnetAddraa
63 *
Oly
State
ProceB
Unrt*
Control Equipment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Errtsdon Point
Height of Enfcs.Pt.
Start
Distance to Emte. Ft.
Start
End
End
Height of Errtss. PI
Start
Direction to Emte.
Start
Rel. to Observer
End
Pt. (Degree!)
End
Verltcd Angle to Ota. Pt.
Start End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point (
Start
Direction to Ota. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
rom Emission Point
End
Desalbe Embdons
Start
Emission Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Plume
Attached d Detached d None CD
Describe Pune Background
Start End
Background Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambent Temp.
Start
End
End
End
Sky ConcWoru
Start End
Wnd Direction
Start
Wet BUb Temp.
End
RH Percent
Aaatlonal Intormatton
E
7
Continued on VEO Foim NLrnber
Observers Name (Prnt)
Observer's
Observation Dote
\Sec
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
6
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
IS
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
^
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
IkneZbne
&&S7~
30
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Method
One)
203A
2038
Othen
Cccnpony Nemo
FodWyNome
Street Address
Oly
State
Pieces)
Unit*
Control EoJpment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Descrtbe Errtsion PoW
Height of Erriss. Pt.
Start End
Distance to EmlB. Pt.
Start End
Height of Errto. Pt. Rel. to Otnerver
Start End
Direction to Emte. Ft. (Degress)
Start End
VerrtcdAndetoObs.Pt. IDUectton to Ot». Pt. (Degrees)
Start End Istart End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from ErrfcJon Point
Start End
Describe Enisions
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Water Droplet PXjne
Attached d Detached O None CD
Describe Rune Background
Start End
Bockgrand Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
SxyCondtlora
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet &Jb Temp. RH Percent
Additional Information
VEOF1.1
Fotm Number
^
•?
*~£ "t
Ojnfcxied on VEOFoirn Number y.
JStf-'T? £rf0
Observation Dole
cJCTA*. t99&
S^
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
O
O
O
O
Q
O
O
o
o
o-
(9
0
0
0
O
0
o
15
O
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
0
o
o
0
kneZone
^"£*5"7"
30
O
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
O
O
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
o
45
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
?£?&/*< "^
Commenta
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Continued on VEO Form tirrtoer
<,
2038
Other.
Company Name
FodUr/Name
StmtAddraa
5F
575*72-
Proce»
Control Equipment
Dec (be Emission Point
Unit*
Opeiattng Mode
Ope rattng Mode
H«gMo Point
Start End
Dejctoe Errtstorn
Start End
ErnWon Color
Start End
Water Droplet PUme
Attached 1 | Dotnched [~ 1 Nona £"]
Desaibe Plume Background
Start End
Badtotouxl Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
ScyCondHloni
Start End
Wind Direction
Start
Wet BJb Temp.
End
RH Percent
Addllond formation
VEOF1.1
vatlon Date
ACT JtH ,
Sec
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
O
0
IS
O
30
45
o
End Time
Commsntt
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
203B
Other
Company Nome
rOCwty rlCITld
Stioot Address
Oly
Procea
Control Equipment
linn*
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Descibe Errtsston Point
rwQht of antes. PF.
Start /AS>
End
Height of Erria. Pt. Rel.to Observer
Start t>L& End
Distance to Emta. Pt.
Start /^V? End
Vertical Angje to Ota. Pt.
Start X^>" End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emtaton Point
Sort S^£>' End
Direction to Embs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start /f* End
Direction to Obs. PI. (Degrees) 6
Start
Oeacdbe Emissions
Start
Errtelon Color
Start
End
Water Droptet Plirne ,
Attached CH Detached CH None (H
Descnbe Plume Background
•art yvgox a*>
Start/
Backgi
Start
round Color
SkyCondtlora
Start
Wnd Speed
Start
Ambien
Start
End
End
Wind Directton
Start -^ •Jr
End
Wet Bulb Temp.
RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
_^___2?Observatton Point
Draw North Arrow
Adcftlonal Information
VEOF1
Form Number
J
P
G*
„
Continued on VEO Form Number
?
P55 — ~ cT~
r s-<*f-^
j
Observation Dote
£&&&&•?%?£
^
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
U
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
O
n
f)
p
0
o
^>
0
p
0
o
o
o
o
£
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
V
*£T
o
5-
o
o
o
15
o
o
rt
rt
rt
£
o
0
O
0
n
o
0
o
0
^
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
*S"
o
o
o
o
o
o
tlmeZone
30
o
o
0
p
0
r>
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
D
ft
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
V
o
o
*
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
(OrdeOne)
"Rtothodf? 2D3A
2038
Other
Fadlt/Name
Oly
Process
Unit*
Control EqUpment
Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Entekm Point
H«ighto(Eniss.Pt.
Start End
DbtcncetoEmlss.pt.
Start End
Height o( Erriss, Pt. M. to Obtervef
Start End
Direction to Emlss. PI. (Degrees)
Start End
Vented Angte to Obs. Pt.
Star) End
Dtetance and Orectkxi to Observation Point 1
Start
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees}
Start End
rom Emission Point
End
Oescdbe Enisstoni
Start
Emission Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet PLme
Attached [~~] Detretorl |~J
NoneD
Dascdbe PKme Backgrouxl
Start End
Backgroind Color
Start
Wnd Speed
Start
Ambient Temp.
Start
End
End
End
SkyCondtlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start
Wet BJb Temp.
End
RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
Draw North Arrow
QMN
X Observation Point
Observer's Position
-F€ET
n
Sun Location Une
umgituae
Latitude
Stack
With
Rune
Sun
Wind
Declination
Acbtlond Information
VEOF1.1
Continued on VEO Foim Nunber
Observer1! Name (Print)
Observation Dote
\toc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
0
O
O
s
0
0
O
O
0
0
O
O
D
0
0
s
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
6
IS
0
0
o
V
o
o
0
0
0
5
0
*£
0
0
0
*.<>
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
£>
o
o
o
o
Q
o
rime Zone
30
0
O
O
0
0
O
0
0
0
*s
s
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
o
0
&
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
45
0
o
0
Q
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
o
0
D
o
o
o
o
Start Time End Time
/ ^*lJ^f
Comments
*<5"J
+
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Mettx^UkaUOfde One)
Gtot»x>d& 203A 2038 Other
Company Name _ _ T
s*?^£- £/r*& /e#7/e*s
FodHy Nonw
A^^r^>^> f=>J./9**T
Street Address
g^97Z: ^e£>i>c7'£' 6>3^
CJty
ses/ysPtses^f***
Proceo
aate /** 'iyA^
Unit* Operattno Mode
Control EqJpment Operating Mode
Describe EfrisSon Polrt
HelghtofEfTte.Pt.
Start End
Otstonce to Erris. PI.
Start End
Vertical Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Emto. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emtas. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
CHstcnce and Direction to Observation Point from Errtsion Point
Start End
Describe Emtalons
Start Efx)
Emtedon Color
Start End
Water Droplet Plane
Attached CD Detached CD None CD
Describe FVme Backgiomd
Start End
BackO'Ocnd Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
ScyCondtlons
Start End
\Mnd Direction
Start End
Wet BUb Temp. RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
X Observation Point
Draw North Arrow
DTN
Observer'] Position
fli
_n
Sm location Une
Lonarlude
Latitude
Stack
With
Pkme
Sun
Wind
Declination
Additional Information
FormMmber
tf
P
fr
r>
V
Pcqe ? ~&~^.
C^tiTuedmVEORxmNiJTiber ^
Observers Name (Prtnt)
Observers Signature
OrgamzaHon
CermedBy
Observation Dote
Mn\
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
O
o
r>
o
0
o
t
o
n
0
o
D
O
D
^
*5
0
0
O
O
0
S
O
O
O
O
O
O
*S
15
O
P
0
r>
o
0
o
0
^
(O
o
*s
0
o
o
o
6"
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
TmeZone __
30
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
-n
o
C)
0
o
o
0
0
o
s
o
o
D
O
o
0
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
45
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
V
o
o
o
*5
o
o
o
o
o
tr
0
o
o
o
£-
o
art Time I End Time
Comments
* < S"^ cJLw7*£^-
*<- S"%
*<5"^
*<5"2
*
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
Focm Number
2038
Olhec
FodBtyNarw
Itieot Address
PicceB
Urtt*
OpoiutriQ Mooo
Control EqJpment
OperaHngMode
Deicilbe EmbSon PoW
HetohtotEmte.Pt.
Slat End
Height ot Errns. Pt. Rel.to Obtwvef
Start End
CWcrce to Emiss. PI.
Start • End
Direction to Emhs. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
Vbrtlcd Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Dfctcnce end CXrectkxi to Observation Point i
Start
Direction to Ota. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
torn Errtsion Point
End
Deachbe Emb*jns
Start
Emlslon Color
Start
End
End
Water Droplet Rune
Attached d Detached CH
NoneCD
Describe Pune Background
Start End
Bockgrotnd Color
Start
Wind Speed
Start
AmHent Temp.
Start
End
End
End
SkyCondtlons
Start End
VAvJ Direction
Start End
Wet BJb Temp.
RH Percent
Source Layout Sketch
Draw North Arrow
DTN
X Obeervatton Point
Observer'] Position
_D
-FEEI
Sun Location Une
Latrrode
Stack
With
Rime
Wind
Declination
VEOF1.1
Observation Dote
/0/£L*t/t&
\Sec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14 '
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
0
O
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
&
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
*s
0
o
Jf
o
15
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
c
o
*5"
v5
,$-
o
o
o
o
o
ImeZone
£&f7~
30
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
*s
0
-------
EPA
VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 1
<^Methodj£? 203A 203B Other
Compcny Norno
^J/^ £.S t^-ZsJ? ££>s£ '/^S&sTTt&'tf
FodHyName ^
j£- / **~tf3 /*) aJfip/J /^/.A^JS
Street Address
City
Process
Control Equipment
^>^T£T £3^
aate U?A **&'-{<-££>
Unit* Operating Mode
Operating Mode
Describe Emission Point
Height of Emlss. Pt.
Start End
DbtancetoEmtes.pt.
Start End
vertical Angle to Obs. Pt.
Start End
Height of Emlss. Pt. Rel. to Observer
Start End
Direction to Emlss. Pt. (Degrees)
Start End
{Direction to Obs. Pt. (Degrees)
Istart End
Distance and Direction to Observation Point from Emission Point
Start End
Describe Emissions
Start End
Emission Color
Start End
Describe Plume Background
Start
Background Color
Start End
Wind Speed
Start End
Ambient Temp.
Start End
Source
X Obse
Ik0*38*
^^^ ^-~\40*^
Water Droplet Plume
Attached D Detached D NoneD
End
Sky CorKftlons
Start End
Wind Direction
Start End
Wet Bulb Temp. RH Percent
LayoutStetch Draw North Arrow
ON DMN
O
rvatl on Point
IT* FEEt
lit n
fJTT
rver-sPosHlon s*v».
-^ Stack _
^^-^^ With Q
— ~^^ Hume
^~^-~^ Sun A
Sun Location Une
Wind ^
Longitude Latitude
Declination
Aoditlond Information
VEOF1.1
Form Number
Ccnthued on VEO Font) Number
PoSe"
Of
bservation Dote
. V /*)
ImeZooe
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
n
n
r>
n
n
n
o
<
s
o
0
o
0
15
n
r?
O
o
0
o
o
o
o
30
(*)
O
n
<0
n
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
45
O
O
o
o
o
o
D
O
O
O
O
0
<>
artmte
EndH
Commenh
-------
Appendix B.2
Raw Field Data
Kiln No. 2-Cooler
-------
EPA METHOD 1
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
Ate- u.
PLANT
CITY
SAMPLING LOCATION
STATE
iLilA
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO OUTSIDE
OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE A) "7^
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO OUTSIDE
OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE B)
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE
DISTURBANCE
SAMPLER
DATE
~T tv
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
i'
^
^
r
£
7
^
9
/tf
//
a
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
O&Li
O.O&1
0,11%
0.171
0.^0
0.1M
o.tw
o ^?
£? / a 0 •*«.
^^n
a ^
STACK
I.D.
)
^
!/
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8-INCH)
/.r-v-i
V ^
j- 4
/^^
/7 ^''
J /v
^ s- ^ '
n ' V
^ ^ •
6,1%*
j *
C. (. ^
DISTANCE B
H
j
'
.
1
\
r
TRAVERSE DISTANCE
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
3 *
* * *
)J ^ I
/r ^ " "
^i 4>x
zx%*
V^ ^y"
5^.^" .....
Cl%*
/ X > "
££ 'S' .
6^ 4" I
7? *
"
•
eoa"-'
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
KANT AND CITY
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
$AMPL£TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT
PRESS
STATIC
n.o
Y
FJU'ER '
STACK
JO
('"-)
PITOT-
AN&UNEHTYPE.
NUMBER DIAMETER
MOI8TURG
t*)
NO.'
4- 1
JJL
fSOXNo,
AC
03M
CAl,
FACTOR(Y)
THERM
NO.
STACK
PtTOT
NQ,
ORSAT
NO.
LEAK
CHECK'
&
CHECK
.(FINAll.
oa
CONTKNT
ooa
OONTENT
TIME
(MJN)
o
r
ML.
jSL
_ifl_
(.0
TOJAl;
TIME !
CLOCK
VOLUME
VEtOCRY
>)6At)--
fln, H20)
O.GO'?
O.OOb
ORIFICE
(In,
1 STACK
^rg&*»
(deg, F)
'•***** t*>
^7\~iYc
-ArtxtzM
/'71
1.1*
delld H
AVfc
TEMP.
OV6N
TEMP
f F)
MPINQER
TEMP^ ^
(deg, F)'.
.TO
r?
r?
OOM
IN/CUT, "
TEMP^ '
/ox
AVE.
'TEMP,
-------
E/l*7.SV£
Page
T* ^
/as" iccr
'-'SAMPLETYPE'-
-'>, /"-RUN NUMBER
J^L
tRAvf?
ELAPSED
\/m-
^XUI
FILTER'^
OV6N, Ij
TEMP'/r
IMPJNG6R
"tX3M'
- IN/OUT
JrTEMP,
A 'TEMP
">''( f)
SAMPLE
TRAIN
ACUU
(In.Hg)
0,607
\/vA-
r?
7
ST
r
af
T
fi/iUTT
1
^7_
O.O6H
/or
IV
O.OOJ
^.
Z/^.
0.001
/8V
A.
ftr
to*
-TOTAIS
•/>
fto
AVSRT
(9.073
A j
F
Checked By:
Date
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
fflBB
Plant: AP£-
Date: iO-*-/-9C>
Sample Box No.: / *?^-/D
Run No.:^ 7 — /^
Job No.: S.Wl,Vt&
Sample Location: A^«Aj tJ0* 2_ £e>vtei —
Sample Type: /^1 -Z-*l l^Jt^r - fw-«-T»-/.5
Sample Recovery Person: £ • £• (L^(Ji^
Container Description Volume, ml
Sealed/Level Marked
Front Half
1 Filter No.(s) 3 & } tj fi £
- / - ^ 0 y
2 Acetone Rinse
3 Nitric Rinse
£/ ^
/5^JL^
ZM^
Back Half
4 Nitric Rinse - Imp. 1,2,3, + Back 1/2 Filter
5A Nitric Rinse - Impinger No. 4
5B KMNO4/H2O Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
5C HCI Rinse - Impingers 5 & 6
lyJV
5^,^
5"^ ^
SC.S
Moisture Data
Impinger
No.
yj
I_
3
£j
^
L>
"7
Total
Contents
£Un*3t
r^/Wv'//^
'ft 7 n
S-XTt^A,
K n* ^L,
n
$<&<*, <\Jt
(7
Initial -73^ ^ Weight, grams
Volume, ml \\ C, Initial
7> I 77T IT 7
y/?^ ^7^D
Z) V^'«^
/** ^fv.y
;/>^ /j^.3
— ?2o,6
^fmal^
l|_
«^/i / i
?rrr
^P?^, (
<£f^Z
6^f
f_3V,7
Net
— a
» /
-^, ^
$.3
l.Z
l*f
0, /
'
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
DATE/ ,
LOCATION
-r
AMBIENT.*
o o
F)
STACK
, IP '
to)
PITOT;
• /" NOZZL6'
M:. *-.
^DOM *
:" - CAl vo
FACTQK(Y)
STACK
.; WO,
STACK
ptTOT
NO,
NO...
CHECK
(INITlAy
OHEOK
OONTENT
OONTENT
ft* Ssf
- %*•".'
K'PACTOft
J2_
lo
AL
ELAPSED
S"
10
/r
?r
rr
> ^%-, ,
^. ?^s "«. ^ •.>
clcKI;
7&OO
77^.7?
.
VdLlJME /'"f?
vetoctw
H6AD^
(In, H20)
fi.hhC.
0.00*6
ORIFICE
. AVB -
delta H
.STACK '
(deg, F)
78-3
(deg. F)
, F)
1'EMP''
(deg, F)
^X.
iN/otjrr :
TEMP-
too
U&-
SAMPLE
'
Zo
r.r
-£^2.
/*«
-------
EMISSION TESTINC
DDATA
Page
of ^>
-TLANT AND CITY
' SAMPLE TYPE
^ RUN NUMBER
-jftLnJ..^
POINT
NO.
EL4PSE
TEST
~ TIME'
CLOCK
- TIME
,
yaocrtv
^HEADV
FILTER
OVEN /
TEMP
C H),
SILGEL
IMPING6K
-TEMP
DGM
IN/OUT
TEMP
C JV
AUX
TEMP.
( F)
SAMPLE
TRAIN
ACUU
(In. Hg)
r
O.W
/or
0.00*
ixr
le
A?
7?
to-?
O.ocft
?ara'"
TOTAU
-TIME
AVGSQRT
-IAVG"
o.nolr
Checked By:
' AVG ,
DGM^F
/0G
Data
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Run No.:
- //
Date: /O- 2/~96
Sample Box No.:
Job No.:
Sample Location:
Sample Type: rt\-"2J\ *VlL
-2.2_
(3.2-
II
o
I3a.fi
Total
Comments:
-------
METHOD 5 TESTING FIELD DATA SHEET
PAGE 1 of
PLANT AND CITY
CATS.
SAMPLING LOCATION
OPKfWOFi .;
AMBIENT
PRESS
(iruHg)
STATIC
PRESS
&.O
AMCTBNT
TSMP;
..(deg,FL..
STACK
*«? .
(In-)
PITOT
UJNGTH
AND UNER TYPE
BOX No.
' OAU ^
FACTOR .(Y)
/.OflJf
wd
NO,
AJA- O
t£AK
OWEOK
..(PMAt).
s-
ELAPSED
-&-
TIME
CLdCK'-
/7Q5
nit)
L
VOLUME
VELOCITY,
H6AD$K
(In, HJW)
t.42-
TEMP.
WLTfift
.OVEN
TEMP'
(deg(F)
-------
EMISSION
-£.0 DATA
Page
of
;k% -^PLANTAND
^^ SAMPLING LOCATION
^gAMPLBTYPE\j
•-":; RUN NUMBER
£&Ki
; POINT
; NO*
ELAPSED
VR0C1W
\ORIFICE
V FILTER
'SILGEL
' DGM
IN/OUT,
;TEMP/
TEMP
'
SAMPLE
-/TRAIN
lACUU
(Inl Hg)
to
1-72*
ni
//o
~20
L7D
Z./8
Z3-7
r
KO
174&
254.
//z.-
z/o
4/
D.DDf-
264^
42-
100
•24-20
238
(o
jo?
7-
11
Ho
30,
/a.
JoA?/S2g
0*070?
Shoot Chested By.
Dale
-------
MULTI-METALS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA JHL---
Plant: A?C- Li***.
Date: 16 - ll-M
Sample Box No.: ^
Sample Location: U. tt-tj »JJ*H.
)i i/
J^^J^
frtf >\ DL,
^
^Jk*. AA)
V
Initial
Volume, ml
/>
- 1^0
)W
£>
JP f
JOT?
—
?-/l-
Run No.: 2- f — ^ 2-
Job No.: S ¥0/- ^3
-te
__ ^_ .^ —
W\»-ref
Volume, ml
Sealed/Level Marked
.,',,'.!'•- '
;£/ X
Ml.-^
f M3 S
'". ••';''^' •• ^'.^;''.''!'.^'^. ' /:':;.-;. ': ••';'. "'" '•
KHif '
£~A ^
?£> ~
5C ^
Weight, grams
Initial
*73/,3-
£~9D ^ -
^5~*7 ' ( & W
\ (^-
9. D
?f f 17-
^Fm^U^
(7/^ji
V. '
yi,c5
£y?'
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
Please read instructions on the reverse before completing
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-454/R-99-045a
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Lime Manufacturing
Emissions Test Report
Chemical Lime Company
(Formerly APG Lime Company)
Ripplemead, Virginia
Volume 1 of II
2.
7. AUTHOR(S)
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 12077
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emission, Monitoring and Analysis Division
Research Triangle Park, NC 2771 1
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
September 1999
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68D70069
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/200/04
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This report presents the results of a testing program conducted at the Chemical Lime Company (formerly APG Lime Company), Ripplemead, Virginia t
obtain air emissions data to support the EPA's development of the lime manufacturing NESHAP. Testing was conducted on a coal-fired rotary kiln to
determine total hydrocarbons, particulate matter, metals, and dioxin/furan at the inlet and outlet of the baghouse. In addition, testing was conducted on
cooler exhaust stack to determine uncontrolled emissions of particulate matter and metals.
Volume I of II - Report Text and Appendices A & B ( 220 Pages)
17.
a. DESCRIPTIONS
Baghouse
Dioxin/Furan
Lime Manufacturing
Metals
Particulate Matter
Total Hydrocarbons
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Unlimited
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
bJDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. COASTI Field/Group
21. NO. OF PAGES
1035
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE
p:\s401.005\s40105-2.trd (wpfi.l)
------- |