Lime Manufacturing Emissions Test Report (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) Final Report: Chemical Lime Company (Formerly APG Lime Company), Ripplemead, Virginia


       United States
       Environmental Protection
       Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-454/R-99-046
September 1999
       Air
       LIME MANUFACTURING EMISSIONS TEST
E PA  REPORT (FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED
       SPECTROSCOPY)

       FINAL REPORT

       Chemical Lime Company
       (Formerly APG Lime Company)
       Ripplemead, Virginia

-------
  LIME MANUFACTURING EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
(FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY)
                                          FINAL REPORT
                                         Chemical Lime Company
                                     (Formerly APG Lime Company)
                                            Ripplemead, Virginia
                                                  Prepared for
                                      Emission Measurement Center
                          United States Environmental Protection Agency
                           Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
                                          Attn: Michael L. Toney
                                     EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-027
                                           Work Assignment 2-11
                                   MRI Project No. 104951-1-015-05
                                             September 30, 1999

-------
11

-------
Preface
This report was prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) for the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under EPA Contract No. 68-D-98-027, Work
Assignment No. 2-11. Mr. Micheal Toney is the EPA Work Assignment Manager (WAM).
Dr. Thomas Geyer is the MRI Work Assignment Leader (WAL). The field test was performed,
and draft and revised test reports were submitted under EPA Contract No. 68-D2-0165, Work
Assignment No. 4-01. Mr. Dennis Holzschuh and Michael Toney were the EPA WAMs for the
Emission Measurement Center (EMC) under Work Assignemnt 4-01.

This report presents the procedures, schedule, and test results for an emissions test
performed at APG Lime Company in Ripplemead Virginia. The field test was conducted in
October, 1996. The draft and revised test reports were submitted in January and September
1997, respectively. MRI performed FTIR emissions measurements at the inlet and outlet of a
baghouse control device and at the cooling stack using EPA Method 320. Method 320 has since
been promulgated in the Federal Register on May 19, 1999. The report has been updated, but no
changes have been made to the results since the draft reports.

This report consists of one volume (250 pages) with six sections and five appendices.

Midwest Research Institute
Andrew Trenholm
Deputy Program Manager
Approved:
Jeff Shular
Director, Environmental Engineering Division

September 30, 1999
111

-------
IV

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES 	vi
LIST OF TABLES	  vii

1.0 INTRODUCTION	1-1
      1.1 BACKGROUND  	1-1
      1.2 PROJECT SCOPE 	1-1
      1.3 PROJECT PERSONNEL	1-2

2.0 TEST LOCATIONS	2-1
      2.1 NO. 2 COOLER STACK	2-1
      2.2 NO. 1 KILN BAGHOUSE INLET	2-1
      2.3 NO. 1 KILN BAGHOUSE OUTLET	2-1

3.0 RESULTS   	3-1
      3.1 TEST SCHEDULE	3-1
      3.2 COOLING STACK	3-1
      3.3 BAGHOUSE INLET  	3-1
      3.4 BAGHOUSE OUTLET 	3-2
      3.5 ANALYTE SPIKING AND VALIDATION OF HC1 	3-2

4.0 FTIR TEST PROCEDURES 	  4-1
      4.1 SAMPLING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION	4-1
           4.1.1 Sampling System Components  	4-1
           4.1.2 Sample Conditioning	4-3
      4.2 SAMPLING PROCEDURE	4-3
           4.2.1 Testing Two Locations Simultaneously	  4-3
           4.2.2 Testing a Single Location 	   4-4
      4.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURES  	4-4
           4.3.1 Batch Sampling	4-4
           4.3.2 Flow Through Measurements 	4-4
           4.3.3 Dilution Samples	    	4-6
           4.3.4 Condenser Samples  	4-6
      4.4 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES  	4-6
      4.5 FTIR SYSTEM	4-7
      4.6 ANALYTE SPIKING	4-7
      4.7 ANALYSIS OF SPIKED RESULTS	4-8
      4.8 SCREENING FOR HAPs	4-8

5.0 SUMMARY OF FTIR QA/QC PROCEDURES	5-1
      5.1 SAMPLING AND TEST CONDITIONS	5-1
      5.2 FTIR SPECTRA	5-3
      5.3 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS	5-3

-------
6.0  REFERENCES	6-1

APPENDIX A.    ADDITIONAL DATA AND CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX B.    FIELD DATA RECORDS
APPENDIX C.    FTIR ANALYTICAL RESULTS
APPENDK D.    PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND DATA
APPENDIX E.    EPA (FTIR) Method 320
                 EPA FTIR PROTOCOL

                                LIST OF FIGURES
                                                                             Page

Figure 2-1.   Test locations at the APG cooling stack	2-2
Figure 2-2.   Test location at the APG baghouse inlet	2-3
Figure 2-3.   Test location at the APG baghouse outlet	2-4
Figure 3-1.   Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 1, 10/22/96 	3-32
Figure 3-2.   Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 1, 10/22/96	3-33
Figure 3-3.   Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 2, 10/23/96	3-34
Figure 3-4.   HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse inlet.  Run 2, 10/23/96  	3-35
"igure 3-5.   Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 3, 10/24/96	3-36
Figure 3-6.   HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse inlet.  Run 3, 10/24/96  	3-37
Figure 3-7.   Concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 1,  10/22/96	3-38
Figure 3-8.   HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 1, 10/22/96  	3-39
Figure 3-9.   Concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 2,  10/23/96	3-40
Figure 3-10.  HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 2, 10/23/96  	3-41
Figure 3-11.  Concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 3,  10/24/96	3-42
Figure 3-12.  HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 3, 10/24/96	3-43
Figure 4-1.   FTIR sampling system configuration	4-2
Figure 4-2.   FTIR instrument configuration	  4-5
                                        VI

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1-1.  PROJECT CONTACTS	 1-2
TABLE 3-1.  SCHEDULE OF FTIR TESTING AT APG	3-4
TABLE 3-2.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG COOLING STACK,
           10/21/96  	3-7
TABLE 3-3.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE INLET,
           RUN 1, 10/22/96  	3-8
TABLE 3-4.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE INLET,
           RUN 2, 10/23/96  	3-10
TABLE 3-5.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE INLET,
           RUN 3, 10/24/96  	3-11
TABLE 3-6.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
           RUN 1, 10/22/96  	3-13
TABLE 3-7.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
           RUN 2, 10/23/96  	'	3-15
TABLE 3-8.  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
           RUN 3, 10/24/96  	3-17
TABLE 3-9.  RESULTS OF HCL SPIKING AT APG BAGHOUSE INLET,
           RUN 1, 10/22/96  	3-20
TABLE 3-10. RESULTS OF HCL SPIKING AT BAGHOUSE OUTLET,
           RUN 2, 10/23/96  	3-21
TABLE 3-11. RESULTS OF HCL SPIKING AT APG BAGHOUSE
           OUTLET, RUN 3, 10/24/96	3-22
TABLE 3-12. APG BAGHOUSE INLET. ESTIMATED UNCERTANTffiS
           FOR NON-DETECTS 	3-23
TABLE 3-13. APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET. ESTIMATED UNCERTANTffiS
           FOR NON-DETECTS 	3-26
TABLE 3-14. APG COOLING STACK. ESTIMATED UNCERTANTffiS
           FOR NON-DETECTS 	3-29
                                  vn

-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND
The Emission Measurement Center (EMC) of the U. S. EPA received a request from the
Minerals and Inorganic Chemicals Group (MICG) of the U.S. EPA to perform emissions testing
at coal-fired lime kilns. In partial fulfillment of the test request EMC issued Work
Assignments 2-11 and 4-01 under EPA Contract Nos. 68-D-98-027 and 68-D2-0165,
respectively, to Midwest Research Institute (MRI). The purpose of this project was to measure
organic and inorganic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) using a test method based on Fourier
transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. This report describes the test procedures and presents
results of the testing at the Chemical Lime Company's (formerly APG Lime Company) plant in
Ripplemead, Virginia.
1.2 PROJECT SCOPE
Three locations were tested at APG: the inlet and outlet of a baghouse controlling
particulate emissions off of the kiln, and the stack from the cooler where the product is cooled.
The procedures followed in this test are described in EPA FTIR Method 320 and the
EPA FTIR Protocol (Appendix D and references 1 and 2). The objectives of the field test were
to: (1) screen for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) regulated in Title in of the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments, (2) measure, if detected, compounds that have been previously measured at cement
kilns (e.g., formaldehyde, naphthalene, p-xylene), and (3) measure other pollutants such as SO2
and NOX.
The test request specifically identified HC1 as a target analyte. This facility used coal as
the fuel to fire the kiln, and HC1 has been measured with FTIR methods at other coal-burning
1-1

-------
facilities. Method 3201 uses an analyte spiking procedure for quality assurance or Method 301
validation to verify that the sampling system is suitable for measuring target analyte(s) at the
expected concentration. In this test, analyte spiking was performed using an HC1 cylinder
standard from Scott Specialty Gases.
In the FTTR screening procedure, spectra of gas samples contained in a leak tight infrared
gas cell are recorded at regular intervals over a sampling run. Typically, 8 to 10 sample spectra
are recorded per hour. These spectra are then analyzed using reference spectra in the EPA FTIR
spectral library to detect and measure any HAPs in the sample. Unidentified spectral features are
analyzed to check for the presence of other compounds for which there may currently be no
reference spectra.
1.3 PROJECT PERSONNEL
This project was administered by the Emission Measurement Center (EMC) of the U.S.
EPA. The Test Request was initiated by the Minerals and Inorganic Chemicals Group (MICG)
of the Office of Air Quality and Standards (OAQPS). Key project personnel are listed in
Table 1-1. Environmental Testing Services, Inc. (ETS) and Envirostaff, Inc., assisted assist MRI
in the field test. Dr. Grant Plummer of Rho Squared assisted in analyzing the data.
TABLE 1-1. PROJECT CONTACTS
APG Lime Co.
EMC Work Assignment
Managers
MRIWAL
Ronald E. Bonnema
Michael Toney
Thomas Geyer
(540)626-7163
(919) 541-5247
(919)851-8181
Ex.3120
1-2

-------
2.0 TEST LOCATIONS

The information in this Section is summarized from material provided by Pacific
Environmental Services, Inc. (PES). Figures 2-1 through 2-3 were also prepared by PES.
APG Lime Company has three coal-fired rotary kilns. The emissions from each kiln are
controlled by a fabric filter baghouse. Each kiln has a cooler exhaust stack that is uncontrolled.
Testing was performed at the No. 2 cooler stack and at the No. 1 kiln baghouse inlet and outlet.
2.1 NO. 2 COOLER STACK
The sampling ports were in a (71.25-in. ID) round, vertical stack, 192 in. upstream and
372 in. downstream of the nearest flow disturbances. The sampling location was indoors just
above floor level. The test location was within 100-ft of the where the FTIR trailer was parked.
The FTIR sampling ports were about 2-ft below the manual test ports shown in Figure 2-1.
2.2 No. 1 KILN BAGHOUSE INLET
The inlet sampling ports were in a round horizontal duct (72 in ID) 47 ft downstream of
the nearest flow disturbance and about 9 ft upstream of the nearest flow disturbance. The FTIR
sampling ports were about 5 ft downstream of the manual test ports shown in Figure 2-2. Access
was provided by scaffolding that was erected prior to the test.
The baghouse inlet location was within 100 ft of the FTIR trailer location.
2.3 No. 1 KILN BAGHOUSE OUTLET
The outlet sampling ports were in a 72.25 in. ID round vertical stack, 390 in. downstream
of the nearest flow disturbance and 390 in. before the stack exit. The FTIR sampling port was
one of the four (A, B, C, and D) shown in Figure 2-3 (in the same plane and 90° apart).
The sampling location was within 100 ft of the FTIR trailer location.
2-1

-------



Floor


o
JN
c«

~j
— 1
1 '
/iS&E3E8SBi8HBfiS8SW

































\





S~
(
\ s
X
^t
CfO«S

^^ 	
/\
A
•SZ. 	 \4"
Section

7L25" ID










ID Nipples 3 25" Deep

SAMPLE TRAVERSE
Point
Number
*
f-










'
1
2
•3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Fraction of
Stack ID

.02!
.067
.118
.177
.250
J56
.644
.750
.823
.8*2
.933
579
Dixttac*
Inches

1^0
4.75
8.44
1Z63
17J1
25J8
45.88
53.44
58.63
62JI
66JO
69.75


POINT LOCATIONS
Port Depth Port Location
Inches

3.25
3.25
3^5
305
305
3O5
305
305
3O5
3O5
305
3.2S
Inches

4.75
8.00
11.69
15.88
21.06
28.63
49.13
56.69
61.88
66.06
69.75
73.00

Figure 2-1.  No. 2 kiln cooling stack location.
                    2-2

-------
From
Kiln
Flow
                                                                                    Baghouse
                 SAMPLR TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Friction of
Slack ID
.026
.082
.146
.226
.342
.658
.774
.854
.911
.974
Distance
IBCBCJ
1.9
5.9
10.5
16.3
24.6
47.4
55.7
61.5
66.1
70.1
                                                                      ?2"
                                                              CroM-Seciion
                          Figure 2-2.  Kiln No. 1 baghouse inlet location.
                                              2-3

-------
                     O
Platform
 Ground
                                                                B
                                                                         72^5" ID
                                                                         4 4-iach ID Ports 6" deep
                                                            Cross Section
                                                        SAMPLE TRAVE?*P POINT LOCATIONS
                                                   Point  Fraction of  Duaoce  Port D«pdi Port Location
                                                 Number  Sack ID   inches    Inches     Inches
1
2
3
4
5
.026
.082
.146
.226
J42
\JU
554
10.56
16J1
24.69
6.00
6JOO
6JOO
6.00
6.00
7.IS
1154
16J6
22J1
30.69
                                                From
                                                Fan
                       Figure 2-3.  Kiln No. 1 baghouse outlet location.
                                             2-4

-------
3.0 RESULTS

3.1 TEST SCHEDULE
A summary of the test schedule is given in Table 3-1 at the back of this section. The
FTIR test runs were coordinated with manual and Method 25A testing conducted by Pacific
Environmental Services (PES). Process conditions were monitored by Research Triangle
Institute (RTI). The schedule also shows the test runs where analyte spiking was performed. A
complete record of the FTIR sampling is in Appendix B.
3.2 COOLING STACK
Table 3-2 shows the analytical results for HC1, SF6, and CO and the deviation from
100 percent recovery of the HC1 spike.
3.3 BAGHOUSE INLET
The primary emissions from the baghouse inlet were water vapor, CO2, HC1, SO2, and
CO. The spectra were also analyzed for NO and NO2. The NOX compounds were difficult to
measure because of moisture interference, except in the samples treated with the condenser.
Tables 3-3 to 3-5 present the ppm results for the analysis of HC1, SO2, SF6 and CO. Figures 3-1
to 3-6 present the same results graphically.
The sample flow rate during Run 1 was very consistent. But during Run 2 the flow
steadily decreased as the run progressed until the sampling rate was only about 1 to 2 LPM for
the latter part of the run. This is the reason for the lower HC1 concentrations measured at the
inlet during Run 2. (It is important to maintain sample flow rate of at least 5 1pm or HC1 can be
reduced in a moist sampling system.) Additionally, with such a low flow rate, it is difficult to fill
the FTIR cell and maintain a positive flow out the manifold vent to prevent air from diluting the
sample back through the vent. The particulate filter was replaced during Run 1, but there was not
enough particulate collected to cause the severe flow restriction. During Run 3 the flow also

3-1

-------
decreased and a block was removed from near the back of the probe just upstream of the
particulate filter. After this block was removed the flow was again very consistent for the
remainder of Run 3.
3.4 BAGHOUSE OUTLET
Tables 3-6 to 3-8 present the measured concentrations for HC1, SO2, SF6, and CO at the
baghouse outlet. The results are presented graphically in Figures 3-7 to 3-12. The gas stream
composition was very similar to the inlet.
Except for Run 2 there is good agreement between the measured HCl concentrations at
the inlet and outlet. The flow restriction at the inlet during Run 2 may have introduced a low
bias in the Run 2 HCl concentrations. Sample flow at the outlet was very stable during all three
runs.
Additionally, the magnitude and period of the variation in flue gas HCl concentrations
was very similar in the spiked and unspiked portions of the test runs.

3.5 ANALYTE SPIKING AND VALIDATION OF HCl
The inlet sample was spiked with the HCl gas standard for part of Run 1. Table 3-9
presents an EPA Method 301 (reference 5) analysis of the spiked and unspiked results. The
statistical analysis gave a t-statistic that meets Method 301 criteria for using the method without
correction (the calculated correction factor was nearly 1). The spiked and unspiked
measurements were not synchronized, but the stack gas HCl concentration was consistent enough
to allow the comparison.
Sample from the outlet was spiked with HCl standard during parts of Runs 2 and 3. A
Method 301 analysis of the spiked and unspiked HCl measurements is presented in Tables 3-10
and 3-11 for Runs 2 and 3, respectively. The statistical analysis of the Run 2 results gave a
t-statistic outside of Method 301 criteria. The calculated correction factor for Run 2 was
nearly 1.5, which also exceeds the Method 301 requirement. However, the analysis of the Run 3
spike results gave a t-statistic within Method 301 criteria (the calculated correction factor was
nearly 1).
Statistically, the reason for the "failure" of the Run 2 spiked results is that the unspiked
concentrations varied over a greater range than the spiked results. This can happen when the

3-2

-------
spiked and unspiked measurements are made sequentially and the flue gas analyte concentration
varies with time. For most of the testing, however, the HC1 concentrations were relatively
consistent and the Run 1 inlet and Run 3 outlet results passed the Method 301 criteria.
                                           3-3

-------
TABLE 3-[.SCHEDULE OF FTIR TESTING AT APG
Dale
10/21/96
10/22/96
Time(Bkg&
Cals)
951-1159

1209

1303
1315



1452-1502
1507-1512
1515-1853
840-900

1048

1051-1056








1844-1847


1907-1937
Time (sampling)

1202-1204

1212-1257


1324-1333
1343
1353-1444




1030

1050

1057-1434
1438
1439-1500
1504
1504-1739
1740
1741-1806
1813-1839

1855-1857
1900-1901

Cooling stack
Background, Calibrations, and leak check
Cooling stack APG
Background
Cooling stack
Background
started SF6 spike
SF6 @ 0.481pm (Cooling slack)
started HC1 spike
Spiked w/HCI (Cooling stack)
HCI 103 ppm flowing through cell
SF64.01 ppm in cell
Background and Calibrations
Background and Calibrations

Kiln No 1. baghouse inlet



Probe in inlet
Calibrations
Baghouse inlet
SF6 spike on
SF6 spike
started HCI spike
HCI spike
HCI spike off
SF6 spike
ambient sample


ambient air through probe
Background and calibrations
Kiln No 1 baghouse outlet

Probe in outlet
Dry N2


Baghouse outlet

Unspiked

Unspiked


ambient sample
SF6 spike
ambient air through probe

-------
                                               TABLE 3-1. (continued)
Date
10/23/96
10/23/96
Time (Bkg &
Cals)

854-1020




1052-1057














1625-1633


Time (sampling)
850

1028-1036
1037-1039
1040
1045

1059-1301
1307
1310-1316
1317-1327
1330-1336
1331
1337
1339-1534
1538
1539-1602
1603
1605-1610
1612-1613
1617

1637-1715
1720
Cooling slack

Kiln No 1 baghouse inlet



ambient air

Inlet probe in stack
Calibrations


Inlet flowing sample
SF6 spike
Inlet flowing


Spiked

Inlet flowing

ambient air through inlet probe



ambient air samples

Kiln No 1. baghouse outlet
ambient air sample
Background, calibration, and leak
check
ambient through probe

Outlet probe in stack


Outlet HAV
SF6 spike to outlet



HC1 spike on to outlet
Evacuated cell and jumper line
Spiked
HCI spike off, SF6 spike on
Spiked
SF6 spike off

H/W outlet
Outlet probe out of stack
Background and calibrations
ambient air samples
started N2 purge through both sample
lines
Ui

-------
TABLE 3-1. (continued)
Date
10/24/96
Time (Bkg &
Cals)
838-1106










1959

2023-2031

2049-2212
Time (sampling)

1108-1415
1416-1437
1441
1448-1619
1621
1623-1624
1628-1629
1632-1645
1647
1650-1957

2003-2018

2034-2041

Cooling slack






Kiln No 1. baghouse inlet

Unspiked
Unspiked

Unspiked

Unspiked

Unspiked

Unspiked

ambient air sample

ambient air sample

Kiln No 1. baghouse outlet
Background, calibrations, and leak
check
Unspiked
spiked w/SF6
started HCI spike
Spiked w/HCI
HCI spike off

SF6 spike
Spiked
SF6 spike off
Unspiked
Background
ambient air sample
Background and calibrations
ambient air sample
Background and calibrations

-------
TABLE 3-2  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG COOLING STACK, 10/21/96.
File name l
COOLHOOl
COOLH002
COOLC003
COOLC004
COOLH005
COOLH006
COOLH007
COOLH008
COOLH009
COOLH010
COOLH011
COOLH012
COOLS013
COOLS014
COOLS015
COOLS016
COOLS017
COOLS019
COOLS020
COOLS021
HC1 expected =
HO spike averaj
percent deviatior
Time
12:03
12:11
12:16
12:21
12:25
12:30
12:34
12:40
12:43
12:48
12:51
12:54
13:24
13:27
13:31
13:53
14:21
14:28
14:34
14:40
3.94
3.12
-20.71%
HCI ppm
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.447
2.643
3.148
3.572



4* a
0.493
0.480
0.501
0.525
0.517
0.540
0.515
0.533
0.532
0.545
0.508
0.533
0.578
0.663
0.825
0.503
0.529
0.570
0.553
0.561



SF6 ppm
0.000
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.151
0.156
0.153
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.153
4.01
26.17
4*a
0.006
0006
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.011
0.009
0.011
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.007
0.007
CO ppm
9.6
10.5
16.4
16.4
11.2
11.4
15.9
18.9
9.3
9.4
9.9
9.4
21.7
14.8
15.9
13.9
15.8
12.6
12.7
12.9
= SF6 average concentration
4* a
4.24
4.1 '1
6.02
6.51
5.67
5.63
6.34
6.01
5.53
5.82
5.87
5.88
6.02
6.06
6.19
5.31
6.60
7.28
7.24
7.43

= SF6 standard concentration
= dilution


CO Ibs/hr
2.42E-01
2.64E-01
4.13E-01
4.12E-01
2.83E-01
2.87E-01
4.00E-01
4.75E-01
2.35E-01
2.36E-01
2.49E-01
2.36E-01
5.70E-01
3.87E-01
4.16E-01
3.64E-01
4.13E-01
3.31 E-01
3.32E-01
3.39E-01
3.44E-01


1 - File name: "COOL" cooling stack; "H" untreated; "S" spiked (bold indicates with HCI or with SF 6);
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-3   FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE INLET, RUN 1, 10/22/96.
File name1
BAGIH001
BAGIH002
BAGIH003
BAGIH004
BAGIH005
BAGIH006
BAGIH007
BAGIH008
BAGIC009
BAGIC010
BAGIF01 1
BAGIF012
BAGIF013
BAGIH014
BAGIF015
BAGIH016
BAGIS017
BAGIS018
BAGIS019
BAGIS020
BAGIS021
BAGIS022
BAGISF23
BAGISF24
BAGISF25
Time
11:08
11:13
11:28
11:31
11:46
11:49
12:14
12:19
12:35
12:39
13:10
13:17
14:05
14:10
14:27
14:33
14:51
14:54
14:59
15:17
15:20
15:25
15:32
15:39
15:45
SO2 ppm
192.2__
203.2
214.6
214.2
218.7
221.7
221.9
221.3
160.6
158.1
232.6
238.0
243.3
240.8
213.5
163.6
81.0
86.9
190.0
175.6
174.7
175.8
177.5
163.1
167.5
4*CT
5.2
_._L3 	 	
5.6
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
6.0
4.0
4.0
6.2
6.3
6.5
6.3
6.2
5.8
4.8
5.0
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.5
5.6
5.5
5.5
SO2 Ibs/hr
102.9
108.8
114.9
114.7
'
117.1
	 " " ' " 	
118.7
118.8
118.5
86.0
84.6
124.5
- 	 •-
127.4
130.3
128.9
114.3
87.6
54.4
58.4
127.7
118.1
117.4
118.2
119.3
109.6
112.6
SF6 ppm
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.814
0.831
0.818
0.029
0.000
0.000
o.ooo
0.000
0.000
4*a
0.028
0.028
0.030
0.029
0.030
0.030
0.031
0.032
0.021
0.021
0.033
0.034
0.034
0.033
0.033
0.031
0.026
0.026
0.029
0.029
0.028
0.029
0.030
0.029
0.029
CO ppm
1198.8
1266.2
1263.0
1241.1
1194.5
1279.9
1260.3
1363.9
1421.7
1294.3
1324.9
1302.5
1323.8
1452.4
798.0
282.7
39.1
22.5
1149.7
1221.5
1240.4
1027.6
1048.4
762.1
966.5
4*CT
284.9
274.5
287.2
283.9
312.0
278.8
286.1
305.7
330.3
255.9
276.7
265.7
263.8
371.2
135.8
51.0
16.9
17.6
274.2
256.1
263.6
232.0
237.3
139.3
225.9
CO Ibs/hr
280.8
296.5
295.8
290.6
279.7
299.7
295.2
319.4
333.0
303.1
310.3
305.0
310.0
340.1
186.9
66.2
11.5
6.6
338.2
3593
364.8
302.3
308.4
224.2
284.3
HC1 ppm
6.4
7.3
26.0
26.8
25.0
28.8
24.7
30.3
2.7
1.6
38.1
38.8
42.8
36.8
41.1
40.5
27.5
27.8
30.2
49.8
49.8
53.9
58.1
57.5
58.6
4*a
0.9
0.9
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.4 j
1
0.5
0.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.7
1.7
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.0
HC1 Ibs/hr
2.0
2.3
8.0
8.2
7.7
8.9
7.6
9.3


11.7
11.9
13.2
11.3
12.6
12.4
10.6
10.7
i
i 11.7





oo
I - File name: "BAGI" haghouse inlet; "H" untreated; "F" (lowing; "S" spiked (bold indicates SFb or HC1); "A" ambient air through the sampling system; "C" condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
TABLE 3-3   CONTINUED
File name1
BAGIS026
BAGIS027
BAGIS028
BAGIS029
BAGIS030
BAGIS031
BAGIS032
BAGIS033
BAGIS034
BAGLS035
BAGIS036
BAGIS037
BAGIS038
BAGIS039
BAGIS040
BAGIA041
BAGIA042
BAGIA043
BAGIA044
BAGIA045
Average Ibs

	
Time
15:54
16:04
16:14
16:24
16:33
16:42
16:51
17:01
17:10
17:18
17:27
17:38
17:55
18:00
18:04
18:14
18:18
18:28
18:37
19:00
per hour =

	
SO2 ppm
166.3
164.2
141.4
199.1
79.6
109.0
191.5
185.5
138.7
138.0
211.2
126.8
182.7
183.2
171.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

4 * CT j SO2 Ibs/hr
5.5
111.8
5.6 j 110.4
5.4 95.1
l 	
5.5 133.9
5.1 |_ 53.5
5.1 1 73.3
5.5
5.5
5.3
5.5
5.7
5.4
128.8
124.7
93.2
92.8
142.0
85.3
5.2 ! 122.9
5.5 [ 123.2
5.6 114.9
1.8
1.8


1.9 !
1
2.2
2.7
108.5
Average SF6 =
Standard SF
dilution =
6 -


SF6 ppm
0.000
4*a
0.029
0.000 0.030
0.000 0.029
0.000
0.029
0.000 0.027
0.000 j 0.027
0.000 0.029
0.000 ! 0.029
i
0.000 0.028
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.814
0.807
0.820
0.029
0.030
0.028
0.028
0.029
0.030
0.015 ().(X)9
0.014
0.017
0.017
0.022

0.817
4.01
	 4.906
0.009
"'
0.010
0.012
0.014

0.028
	
CO ppm 4 * a
1363.7
1634.6
432.1
1078.6
53.4
28.6
1199.7
1288.7
295.8
437.3
76.7
249.6
20.1
19.2
	 284.1
284.0
245.1 48.4
1
423.7 | 77.0
1216.6
140.2
1028.5
1235.5
1616.4
62.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

3.43%

276.8
36.5
221.0
274.1
446 .4
13.9
8.2
8.7
9.1
8.9



CO Ibs/hr
401.1
4808
1271
317.3
15.7
8.4
352.9
379.1
72.1
124.6
3579
41.2
302 5
3634
475.4





263.3

DSCFM =
% moisture =
HCI ppm
46.7
49.0
53.4
56.1
54.9
58.4
57.8
54.4
57.9
55.5
58.0
55.1
28.7
31.7
29.3
5.8
3.7
2.5
1.6
0.7


51576
3.9
4*a
1.5
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.8
HCI Ibs/hr












1.0 11.1
1.1
12.2
1.1 ! 11.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


	




9.7

- 	
1 - File name: "BAGI" baghouse inlet; "H" untreated; "P" (lowing;  "S" spiked (hold indicates SPb or HCI); "A" ambient air through the sampling system; "C" condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-4  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE INLET, RUN 2, 10/23/96.
File name '
BAGIA201
BAGIH202
BAGIH203
BAGIH204
BAGIH205
BAGIH206
BAGIH207
BAGIF208
BAGIF209
BAGIF210
BAGIF211
BAGIF212
BAGIF213
BAGIF214
BAGIF215
BAGIF216
BAGIF217
BAGIA218
BAGIA219
BAGIA220
Time
10:38
11:06
11:16
11:29
11:41
12:10
12:25
13:02
13:13
13:33
13.42
13:57
14:17
14:31
14:46
15:05
15:47
16:08
16:44
17:10
average Ibs/hour =




SO2 ppm
0.0
262.8
265.9
271.8
266.9
255.9
261.8
276.6
268.9
240.7
265.7
259.3
246.6
209.8
208.9
209.9
270.9
0.0
0.0
0.0

DSCFM =
% moisture =
4*a
14.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
5.8
5.7
6.0
6.3
6.2
5.8
6.1
5.8
5.8
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.8
1.5
0.9
0.8

54368
3.6
SO2 Ibs/hr

148
150
153
150
144
147
156
151
135
149
146
139
118
118
118
152



142.1


CO ppm
11.2
1227.7
1181.9
1187.9
1084.5
938.8
1093.0
1128.5
1244.5
1047.3
1091.4
948.1
579.4
315.7
324.2
236.6
802.2
38.5
23.0
20.0



4*0
8.7
231.1
241.0
233.1
210.3
150.3
224.0
251.6
333.8
204.2
238.6
158.9
84.3
48.7
48.6
40.8
125.3
7.4
4.6
4.4



CO Ibs/hr

302.1
290.9
292.3
266.9
231.0
269.0
277.7
306.3
257.7
268.6
233.3
142.6
111
79.8
58.2
197.4



222.0


HC1 ppm
1.95
8.84
11.09
13.46
18.58
11.49
18.25
12.10
6.57
10.56
6.35
9.47
16.46
17.14
20.59
26.00
30.31
7.28
2.95
1.54



4 * a
0.44
0.93
1.02
1.04
1.13
0.89
1.07
0.95
0.81
0.90
0.87
0.84
0.94
0.93
1.07
1.19
1.30
0.46
0.34
0.38



HCI Ibs/hr

2.86
3.58
4.35
6.00
3.71
5.90
3.91
2.12
3.41
2.05"
3.06
5.32
5.54
6.65
8.40
9.79



4.79


1 - File name: "BAGI" baghouse inlet sample; "H" untreated; "F" flowing; "A" ambient air through the sampling system.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
TABLE 3-5  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE INLET, RUN 3, 10/24/96.
File name
BAG1A301
BAGIH302
BAOIH303
BAGIH304
BAGIH305
BAGIH306
BAGIH307
BAGIH308
BAGIH309
BAGIH310
BAGIH311
BAGIH312
BAGIH313
BAGIH314
BAGIC315
BAGIC316
BAGIH317
BAGIH318
BAGIH319
BAC,ffl320
BAGIH321
BAGIH322
BAGIH323
BAGIH324
BAGIH325
BAGIH326
BAGIH327
BAGIH328
Time
10:40
11:14
11:21
11:29
11:37
1 1 :46
12:03
_.12:J4_.
12:26
12:39
r 12:51
13:06
13:15
13:41
13:52
13:57
14:18
14:31
14:48
15:00
15:14
15:23
15:33
15:41
15:50
16:06
16:23
16:32
SO2 ppm
0.0
159.1
1269
127.1
149.7
132.9
150.3
162.0
155.3
135.1
141.2
169.1
157.5
158.8
108.7
113.1
149.7
225.8
235.3
233.4
239.7
227.5
245.4
2337
240.2
192.1
223.1
235.7
4*a
4.1
7.7
8° -H
8.2 '
8.5
8.8
7.0
7.1
7.1
7.0
7.2
69
7.2
6.6
4.9
4.8
6.7
7.1
7.2
7.6
7.6
7.5
8.1
77
7.7
7.2
7.5
7.6
SO, Ibs/hr

924
73.7
73.8
86.9
77.1
87.3
94.0
90.2
78.4
82.0
98.2
91.4
92.2
63.1
657
86.9
131 1
136.6
135.5
139.1
132.0
1425
135.7
139.4
111 5
129.5
1368
CO ppm
0.0
62.2
26.8
117.2
145.0
124.1
97.5
73.5
97.6
91.1
52.5
300.2
181.6
374.7
200.7
445.9
0.0
781.3
1067.0
1033.0
992.9
812.9
1739.3
1349.1
1271.4
431.4
960.0
1311.8
4*0
! 7.1
182
172
21.6
24.2
22.9
21.4
19.6
22.0
21.1
20.0
45.9
37.9
53.5
33.2
56.2
18.7
101.4
143.2
142.2
138.5
112.6
325.7
203.8
189.3
67.0
130.1
201.8
CO Ibs/hr

23.5
18.7
18.7
22.1
196
222
23.9
22.9
199
208
24.9
23.2
23.4
16.0
16.7
22.1
33.3
34.7
34.4
35.3
33.5
36.2
34.5
35.4
28.3
329
34.7
HCI ppm
1. 53
57.07
66.44
63.51
64.50
63.61
60.67
55.71
62.64
60.58
59.23
67.14
65.87
55.31
1.73
0.00
43.88
65.07
57.54
60.63
70.25
68.24
62.13
64.67
62.19
67.74
68.75
66.69
4*CT
1.45
4.11
4.74
4.50
4.45
4.35
3.99
___3_.72_
3.84
3.76
3.60
3.80
3.75
3.12
1.68
1.80
2.56
3.35
3.05
3.17
3.41
3.27
3.11
3.25
3.07
3.32 ^
3.37
3.22
HCI Ibs/hr

19.0
22.1
21.2
21.5
21.2
20.2
18.6
	 	 -
20.9
20.2
19.7
22.4
22.0
18.4


14.6
21.7
192
20.2
23.4
22.7
20.7
21.6
20.7
22.6
22.9
22.2
1  - File name: "BAGI" baghouse inlet; "H" untreated; "F" flowing; "A" ambient air through the sampling system; "C" condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-5   CONTINUED
File name Time SO2 ppm 4 * a SO, Ibs/hr CO ppm 4 * a CO Ibs/hr HCI ppm 4 * a HCI Ibs/hr
BAGIH329
BAGIH330
HAGIH331
BAGIH332
BAGIH333
BAGIC334
BAGIC335
BAGIH336
BAGIH337
BAGIH338
BAGIH339
BAGIH340
BAGIH341
BAGIH342
BAGIH343
BAGIH344
BAGIH345
BAGIH346
BAGIA347
BAGIA348
BAGIA349
16:39
16:50
17:15
17:22
17:30
17:40
17:48
18:01
18:17
18:30
18:46
18:54
19:03
19:J2
19:20
19:28
19:35
19:42
20:03
20:12
20:42
average Ibs/hour =




248.8
246.3
251.6
243.8
249.2
126.3
120.7
226.5
208.1
206.2
202.1
199.5
207.0
225.0
226.4
237.6
228.2
239.4
0.0
0.0
0.0

DSCFM =
% moisture =
76 — .
76
7.9
	 Z:§ 	
8.1
4.4
4.4
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.1
7.7
8.2
2.3
2.4
2.7

55870
4
144.4
143.0
146.1
141.5
144.7
73.3
70.1
131.5
120.8
119.7
117.3
115.8
120.1
130.6
131.4
137.9
132.5
139.0

86.0


1448.3
1412.5
1609.5
1178.1
1718.7
384.4
234.7
720.6
663.9
515.0
706.0
379.4
603.7
918.5
913.2
1269.1
968.9
1577.4
12.5
0.0
0.0



272.4
253.6
298 1
168.7
310.9
51.9
38.1
95.3
91.1
76.4
96.8
60.8
84.1
124.8
122.1
188.4
132.4
288.8
6.6
6.6
6.8



36.7
363
37.1
35.9
367
18.6
17.8
33.4
30.7
30.4
29.8
29.4
30.5
33.2
33.4
35.0
33.6
35.3
-
21.8


65.96
66.05
62.75
66.17
67.01
2.92
3.85
64.39
65.85
70.94
60.85
62.28
60.52
56.99
58.75
60.29
57.60
56.37
3.29
2.84
2.21



3.21
3.35
3.20
3.25
3.36
1.79
1.74
3.35
3.35
3.55
3.26
3.36
3.29
3.14
3.24
3.22
3.13
3.16
1.56
1.57
1.62



22.0
22.0
20.9
22.1
22.3

21.5
21.9
23.6
20.3
20.8
20.2
19.0
19.6
20.1
19.2
18.8
!
20.6


U)

K)
1 - File name: "BAGI" baghouse inlet; "H" untreated; "F" flowing; "A" ambient air through the sampling system; "C" condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
TABLE 3-6. FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET, RUN 1, 10/22/96.
File name1
BAGOHOOl
BAGOH002
BAGOH003
BAGOH004
BAGOC005
BAGOC006
BAGOH007
BAGOH008
BAGOH009
BAGOH010
BAGOP01 1
BAGOF012
BAGOF013
BAGOH014
BAGOF015
BAGOH016
BAGOHOn
BAGOF018
BAGOH020
BAGOF020
BAGOH021
BAGpHg22
BAGOH023
BAGOH024
BAGOH025
Time
lljOO 	
11:05 	
11:18
11:22
11:38
11:41
11:54
12:00
12:25
12:30
12:49
12:58
13:30
13:57
14:16
14:21
14:40
14:46
15:05
15:12
15:51
16:00
16:09
16:20
16:28
SO2 ppm
48.86
47.05
47.82
47.39
29.03
33.70
47.85
47.60
48.54
46.95
49.11
50.88
53.18
52.23
49.78
49.87
47.45
26.10
46.44
46.36
45.08
41.29
45.25
20.02
47.76
4*a
0.28
0.32
0.33
0.34
0.21
0.23
0.33
0.34
0.33
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.36
0.34
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.32;
0.34
0.36
0.35
0.34
0.35
0.31
0.36
SO2 Ibs/hr
26.2
25.2
256
25.4
15.6
18.1
25.7
25.5
26.0
25.2
26.3
27.3
28.5
28.0
26.7
26.7
25.4
14.0
24.9
24.9
24.2
22.1
24.3
10.7
25.6
CO ppm
1309.5
1351.1
1450.9
1545.6
1632.8
1816.5
1364.7
1301.4
1187.4
1177.5
1250.4
1232.3
1431.5
1831.9
1480.6
1319.2
1909.9
194.9
1095.4
1159.5
1259.1
1270.6
1357.5
28.55
1306.1
4*a
65.9
64.4
69.1
72.8
133.0
227.3
67.4
68.4
64.8
66.7
66.7
62.6
86.0
222.4
75.3
74.9
222.3 __
10.3
65.2
67.9
77.2
82.7
77.3
4.9
78.9
CO Ibs/hr
307.3
317.0
340.4
362.7
383.1
426.2
320.2
305.3
278.6
276.3
293.4
289.1
335.9
429.8
347.4
309.5
448.1
45.7
257.0
272.0
295.4
298.1
318.5
6.7
306.5
HC1 ppm
21.2
26.4
22.9
26.1
2.3
1.2
28.0
28.8
28.4
29.6
32.5
35.1
38.6
30.6
38.5
34.6
34.4
35.8
37.0
39.9
36.9
37.5
34.4
35.3
38.9
4*a
1.20
1.41
1.26
1.39
0.45
0.46
1.39
1.43
1.36
1.39
1.48
1.55
1.59
1.36
1.52
1.36
1.32
134
1.33
1.45
1.28
1.31
1.20
1.24
1.31
HCI Ibs/hr
6.5
8.1
7.0
8.1
0.7
0.4
8.6
8.9
8.8
9.1
10.0
10.8
11.9
9.4
11.9
10.7
10.6
11.0
11.4
12.3
11.4
11.6
10.6
10.9
12.0
1 - File name: "BAGO" baghouse outlet; "H" untreated; "F" flowing; "A" ambient air through the sampling system;  "C" condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-6. CONTINUED
File name1
BAGOH026
BAGOH027
BAGOH028
BAGOH029
BAGOH030
BAGOH031
BAGOH032
BAGOA033
BAGOA034
BAGOA035
Time
16:38
16:46
16:55
17:06
17:14
17:23
17:32
18:24
18:33
18:56
average Ibs/hour =




SO2 ppm
20.81
50.58
49.29
49.23
47.48
21.99
48.41
0.00
0.00
0.00

DSCFM =
% moisture =
4*0
0.32
SO, Ibs/hr
11.2
0.35 i 27.1
0.35
0.37
0.36
0.32
26.4
26.4
25.5
11.8
0.36 f 26.0
0.12
0.12
0.11

51888
3.5



23.5


CO ppm
24.5
1009.5
1228.9
2228.0
1315.0
65.7
1236.8
28.45
13.98
18.16



4*a
5.05
58.5
72.8
305.4
72.8
5.43
67.6
2.73
2.33
2.22



CO Ibs/hr
5.7
236.8
2883
522.8
308.5
15.4
290.2



288.7


HCI ppm
37.1
44.7
40.7
40.9
41.3
37.5
40.5
3.7
2.3
1.0



4*0
1.30
1.49
1.39
1.38
1.40
1.33
1.39
0.46
I 0.47
0.47



HCI Ibs/hr
11.4
138
125
12.6
12.7
11.5
12.5



10.0


1 - File name: "BAGO" baghouse outlet; "H" untreated; "F" flowing; "A" ambient air through the sampling system;  "C" condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-7  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET, RUN 2, 10/23/96.
File name
BAGOA201
BAGOA202
BAGOH203_
BAGOH204
BAGOH205
BAGOH206
BAGOH207
BAGOH208
BAGOH209
BAGOH210
BAGOH211
BAGOH212
BAGOH213
BAGOH214
BAGOS215
BAGOS216
BAGOS217
BAGOS218
BAGOS219
BAGOS220
BAGOS221
BAGOS222
BAGOS223
BAGOS224
BAGOS225
BAGOS226
BAGOS227
Time
10:29
10:34
10:59
11:10
11:21
11:33
11:47
12:18
12:30
12:37
12:42
12:46
12:51
12:55
13:17
13:22
13:25
13:48
14:00
14:05
14:10
14:21
14:36
14:57
15:10
15:14
15:18
SO2 ppm
0.00
0.00
58.46
57.63
57.93
54.57
56.62
56.90
57.28
56.81
56.71
55.72
57.76
57.95
52.34
53.14
53.48
50.75
52.36
50.85
49.52
43.75
39.3 1
25.98
46.68
47.89
41.02
4*CT
0.15
0.19
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.34
0.34
0.35
0.34
0.34
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.33
0.32
0.34
0.67
0.35
0.42
0.43
0.31
0.30
0.28
0.31
0.32
0.31
SOZ Ibs/hr

31 3
30.8
31.0
29.2
303
305
30.7
30.4
30.4
29.8
30.9
31.0
30.5
31.0
31.2
29.6
30.5
296
28.9
255
229
15.1
27.2
279
23.9
SF6 ppm
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.327
0.321
0.326
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4*a
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
	
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.008
0.008
0.008
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CO ppm
50.1
91.6
1376.1
1320.8
1280.1
913.3
1010.6
962.0
917.7
922.1
908.6
835.9
1035.8
989.0
949.7
1015.5
1339.5
892.0
885.0
805.9
744.4
245.7
106.5
27.6
383.3
476.1
212.4
4*(T
2.5
3.3
66.6
66.4
65.7
35.6
41.6
40.0
37.2
38.8
38.1
33.7
53.2
44.4
38.9
49.3
81.4
34.1
35.6
31.0
27.7
10.4
4.9
~~
3.7
13.5
16.5
9.3
CO Ibs/hr

322.2
309.3
299.7
213.8
236.6
225.3
214.9
215.9
212.8
195.7
242.5
231.6
242.2
259.0
341.6
227.5
225.7
205.5
189.9
62.7
27.2
7.0
97.8
121.4
54.2
IK 1 ppm
4.89
5.84
42.18
45.29
45.01
46.22
47.40
48.19
48.61
50.93
53.24
52.61
52.32
53.34
43.23
46.91
48.76
43.75
50.25
53.05
54.16 	
52.69
53.51
52.49
54.90
56.92
56.61
4*a
0.46
0.50
2.12
2.26
2.19
2.16
2.17
2.08
2.07
2.13
2.24
2.22
2.18
2.19
1.73
1.90
1.93
1.78
1.99
2.16
2.20
2.05
2.16
2.11
2.22
2.34
2.37
IK 1 Ibs/hr

13.0
13.9
13.8
14.2
14.6
148
14.9
- - 	
15.7
16.4
16.2
16.1
16.4
14.5
15.7
16.3



	 -----





1  - File name' "BAGO" baghouseoutlet, "H" untreated, "F" flowing; "S" spiked (bold in box Indicates SF 6 or HCI), "A" ambient air through the sampling system, "C"
condenser sample.
"4*slgma" - estimated uncertainty

-------
 TABLE 3-7  CONTINUED
File name
BAGOS228
BAGOS229
BAGOS230
BAOOS231
BAGOS232
BAGOS233
BAGOS234
BAGOH235 	
BAGOA236
BAGOA237
BAGOA238
Time
15:22
15:25
15:29
15:34
15:52
15:56
16:00
16:11
16:37
17:00
17:14
average Ihs/hour =






SO2 ppm 4 * CT
38.92 0.30
35.61
23.29
26.37
50.21
47.51
41.31
50.46
0.00
p. oq
0.00

0.30
0.2S
0.29
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.32
0.10
0.16
0.10

S()2 Ibs/hr
22.7
20.8
13.6
15.4
29.3
27.7
24.1
27.0


26.5
SF6 ppm : 4 * a
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.329
0.332
0.333
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Average SF6 concentration = [0.328
SF6 standard =
dilution =
14.01
112.21
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0



CO ppm I 4 * a CO Ibs/hr
217.5
47.2
28.8
32.8
	
704.6
585.6
310.5
9.3 ' 55.5
3.9
3.5
3.6
	
23.9
20.1
11.3
563.4 | 19.0
42.0 • 1.6
10.5
24.6


0.9
1.3


12.0
7.3
8.4
179.7
149.4
79.2
131.9
	

164.9

!
i

HCI ppm| 4* a JHC1 Ibs/hr
55.49 j 2.29
56.24
53.86
54.71
48.13
49.29
48.24
50.65
5.95
2.35
2.21
2.26
2.02
2.02
2.01
2.14
0.35
3.39 j 0.76
3.45 0.37
!

DSCFM =

51890
% moisture d 3.3


14.8
15.1
14.8
15.6
	
14.3



U)

Os
 1 - File name: "BAGO" baghouseoutlet; "H" untreated; "f" flowing, "S" spiked (bold in box indicates SF 6 or HCI); "A" ambient air through the sampling system, "C"
condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-8  FTIR RESULTS FROM THE APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET, RUN 3, 10/24/96
File name '
BAGOA301
BAGOH302
BAGOH303
BAGOH304
BAGOI1305
BAGOH306
BAGOH307
BAGOH308
BAGOH309
BAGOH310
BAGOH3n
BAGOH312
BAGOH313
BAGOH314
BAGOC315
BAGOC316
BAGOH317
BAGOS318
BAGOS319
BAGOS320
BAGOS321 	
BAGOS322
BAGOS323
BAGOS324
BAGOS325
BAGOS326
BAGOS327
Time
10:34
11:09
11:1_7
11:25
11:33
11:41
11:58
12:08
12:21
12:32
12:44
13:00
13:09
13:25
13:29
13:33
14:08
14:21
14:27
14:35
_ 14:54
15:05
15:09
15:18
15:29
15:37
15:45
SO2 ppm
0.00
31.44
30.00
28.96
29.75
34.79
29.17
28.74
29.44
24.94
23.05
28.48
32.99
34.59
27.88
24.34
49.64
44.93
37.68
45.77
44.54
41.86
46.08
47.46
47.82
46.32
47.99
4*CT
0.15
0.42
0.44
0.46
0.48
0.50
0.37
0.40
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.40
0.39
0.29
0.29
0.40
0.39
0.38
0.38
0.39
0.40
0.38
0.39
0.40
0.41
0.41
S()2 Ibs/hr
18.2
17.4
16.8
17.2
20.2
16.9
16.7
J71 	
14.5
13.4
16.5
19.1
20.0
16.2
14.1
288
27.4
23.0
279
27.1
25.5
28.1
28.9
29.1
28.2
293
SF6 ppm
0.033
0.071
0.066
0.072
0.077
0.083
0.035
0.039
0.036
	
0.040
0.037
0.036
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.039
0.197
0.192
0.201
0.000
0.000
0.036
0.038
0.037
0.000
0.000
4*a
0.004
0.010
0.010
0.011
0.011
0.012
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
(X) ppm
0.00
149.94
34.69
91.77
125.71
149.66
22.36
21.32
27.60
20.12
19.09
85.00
176.24
343.48
283.56
61.88
785.68
797.92
437.71
661.86
683.66
418.19
742.92
1069.51
1101.91
1252.09
1067.77
4*a
1.55
5.54
4.07
4.92
5.52
6.08
4.02
4.29
4.15
4.34
A37..
5.29
8.82
12.61
9.69
3.49
24.44
24.86
15.54
21.06
22.20
15.61
23.77
36.56
38.66
46.07
37.42
(X) Ibs/hr
380
8.8
23.3
31.9
38.0
5.7
5.4
7.0
5.1
4.8
21.6
44.7
87.1
71.9
15.7
199.2
212.8
116.7
176.5
182.3
111.5
198.1
285.2
293.8
3339
284.7
IK 1 ppm
0.00
45.00
56.99
59.39
60.11
60.36
53.66
60.12
54.75
56.18
54.10
54.81
58.61
57.03
3.16
0.00
52.78
60.85
56.90
60.98
58.50
64.23
65.29
62.23
61.02
60.49
61.41
4*a
1.48
3.42
4.11
4.23
4.16
4.14
3.73
3.96
3.59
3.60
3.38
	 	
3.38
3.50
3.29
1.76
1.75
2.88
3.17
2.97
3.13
3.02
3.21
3.18
3.08
3.00
2.99
3.02
HCI Ibs/hr
15.0
19.0
19.8
20.0
20.1
17.9
20.0
18.2
	 — - '
18.7
	 18.0
18.2
19.5
19.0


17.6
21.3
19.9
21.3
	 	





1  - File name: "BAGO" baghouse outlet, "H" untreated, "F" flowing, "S" spiked (bold, in box, Indicates SF 6 or HCI) "A" ambient air through the sampling system, "C"
condenser sample.
"4*sigma" - estimated uncertainty

-------
 TABLE 3-8 .  CONTINUED
File name '
BAGOS328
BAGOS329
BAGOS330
BAGOS331
BAGOS332
BAGOS333
BAGOS334
BAGOS335
BAGOS336
BAGOH337
BAGOH338
BAGOH339
BAGOH340
BAGOH341
BAGOH342
BAGOC343
BAGOC344
BAGOH345
BAGOH346
BAGOH347
BAGOH348
BAGOH349
BAGOH350
BAGOH351
BAGOH352
BAGOH353
BAGOH354
Time
15:53
15:58
16:02
16:09
16:13
16:18
16:28
16:36
16:43
17:07
17:18
17:27
17:34
17:44
17:52
18:12
18:20
18:26
18:34
18:42
18:50
18:59
19:07
19:16
19:23
19:32
19:39
S()2 ppm
47.17
45.97_
43.94
43.48
40.31
37.25
45.43
46.82
43.73
53.33
48.71
50.62
50.68
47.43
45.43
28.25
29.26
44.58
44.92
43.15
45.70
45.97
45.52
48.46
47.28
48.27
48.10
4*a
0.40
0.40
0.39
0.37
0.37
0.38
0.38
0.39
0.37
0.40
0.40
0.42
0.42
0.39
0.40
0.25
0.27
0.39
0.40
0.39
0.40
0.42
0.41
0.42
0.41
0.41
0.41
S()2 Ibs/hr
28.8
28.0
26.8
26.5
24.6
22.7
27.7
28.5
26.7
30.9
28.2
29.3
29.4
27.5
26.3
16.4
17.0
25.8
26.0
25.0
26.5
26.6
26.4
28.1
27.4
28.0
27.9
SF6 ppm
0.038
0.000
0.000
0.036
0.036
0.000
0.192
0.200
0.198
0.037
0.039
0.040
0.042
0.040
0.041
0.000
0.000
0.040
0.040
0.039
0.041
0.044
0.043
0.045
0.043
0.041
0.042
4*CT
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.010
0.010
CO ppm
981.93
1141.39
780.38
726.81
573.27
356.38
949.85
1089.77
784.15
1454.58
846.33
1664.03
886.12
727.87
626.95
374.72
432.92
639.27
659.12
550.73
782.79
667.00
742.26
1028.54
996.61
902.44
1023.76
4*a
33.15
40.30
26.11
25.06
19.54
14.73
33.02
38.78
26.46
61.65
28.14
73.69
29.86
24.13
20.88
12.83
14.44
21.02
22.29
18.53
25.41
22.32
24.11
33.61
31.25
28.20
33.03
CO Ibs/hr
261.8
304.4
208.1
193.8
152.9
95.0
253.3
290.6
209.1
368.9
214.6
422.0
224.7
184.6
159.0
95.0
109.8
162.1
167.1
139.7
198.5
169.1
188.2
260.8
252.7
228.8
259.6
IICI ppm
60.21
58.34
60.61
64.47
62.73
64.70
58.27
57.39
55.74
55.52
59.73
58.73
59.66
58.40
60.38
0.00
3.00
59.74
62.87
57.99
59.78
63.29
60.63
61.15
61.49
59.48
60.42
4*a
3.06
2.96
3.03
3.04
3.08
3.13
2.84
2.92
2.84
2.90
3.08
2.98
3.08
3.00
3.14
1.82
1.88
3.05
3.28
3.08
3.13
3.28
3.17
3.21
3.30
3.23
3.25
IICI Ibs/hr





20.4
20.1
19.5
18.5
19.9
19.5
19.9
19.4
20.1


19.9
20.9
19.3
19.9
21.1
20.2
20.4
20.5
19.8
20.1
u>
 I


oo
1 - File name: "BAGO" baghouse outlet; "H" untreated; "F" flowing, "S" spiked (bold, in box. Indicates SF 6 or HCI) "A" ambient air through the sampling system; "C"


condenser sample.

"4*slgma" - estimated uncertainty.

-------
 TABLE 3-8  CONTINUED
File name ' Tjme SO2 ppm 4 * a SO2 Ibs/hr SF6 ppm 4 * a CO ppm 4 * a co lbs/hr MCI ppm 4 * a nci Ibs/hr
BAGOH355
BAGOH356 _
BAGOA357
BAGOA358
BAGOA359
BAGOA360
19:47
19:5 1
20:07
20:17
20:35
20:39
Average Ibs/hour =
	 __ 	


	 	 	

50.20
51.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

	 - 	 - 	

0.43
0.44
0.14
0.16
0.15
0.17


29.1
297


24.2

SF6 spike =
SF6 standard =
dilution = 1
0.042
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000


0.197
4.01
2038
0.010
0.010
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.004


0.009
4.50%
1453.50
1400.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00


64.58
61.59
1.72
1.69
1.56
1.66


368.6
355.2


169.1


60.53
58.46
8.14
7.72
3.90
5.17


DSCFM =
% moisture =

3.30
3.22
1.67
1.67
1.62
1.68


55904
3.8

20.1
19.5
	 	 	 -----

19.5

-— - 	 —

1 - File name: "BAGO" baghouse outlet, "H" untreated, "F" flowing, "S" spiked (bold, in box, indicates SF 6 or HCI) "A" ambient air through the sampling system, "C"
condenser sample.
"4*slgma" - estimated uncertainty

-------
TABLE 3-9. RESULTS OF HC1 SPIKING AT APG BAGHOUSE INLET;  RUN 1, 10/22/96.

Time
11:28
11:31
11:46
1 1 :49
12:14
12:19
13:10
13:17
14:05
14:10
14:27
14:33








Unpiked (ppm)
26.02
26.83
24.97
28.79
24.66
30.26
38.06
38.82
42.82
36.77
41.10
40.45
33.30
26.51
SD =
F =
RSD=
Bias =
t =
HC1 spiking
d i (d i)2

0.81 0.650

3.83 14.648

5.61 31.434

0.76 0.581

-6.05 36.599

-0.65 0.422
4.30 84.334

2.651
0.516
8.0
-0.439
0.47
Time
15:17
15:20
15:25
15:32
15:39
15:45
15:54
16:04
16:14
16:24
16:33
16:42








Spiked
49.79
49.83
53.91
58.06
57.49
58.60
46.67
49.04
53.40
56.08
54.93
58.44
53.85

SD =
SDpooIed =

Exp Cone =
CF =

di

0.04

4.14

1.11

2.37

2.68

3.51
13.85

1.904
2.308

20.99
1.02

(dD2

0.001

17.171

1.238

5.594

7.185

12.317
43.506






SF6 spike =
SF6 standard :
dilution =
HC1 standard
Exp con =
0.817 0.007
4.01 measured
4.906 =..8173/4.01
103 ppm
20.994 = 103ppm/dilution
0.91%

                                                                        Results from Table 3-3
Statistical quantities are defined in EPA Method 301, Section 6.3.

-------
TABLE 3-10. RESULTS OF HC1 SPIKING AT BAGHOUSE OUTLET; RUN 2, 10/23/96

Time
10:59
11:10
11:21
11:33
1 1 :47
12:18
12:30
12:37
12:42
12:46
12:51
12:55








Unspiked (ppm)
42.2
45.3
45.0
46.2
47.4
48.2
48.6
50.9
53.2
52.6
52.3
53.3
48.8
44.8
SD =
F =
RSD=
Bias =
t =

d.

3.11

1.21

0.79

2.32

-0.63

1.02
7.81

1.244
0.491
2.6
-2.66
6.07
HC1 spiking
(di)2

9.67

1.47

0.62

5.37

0.40

1.04
18.57




1.33
3.04
Time
14:05
14:10
14:21
14:36
14.57
15:10
15:14
15:18
15:22
15:25
15:29
15:34








Spiked
53.0
54.2
52.7
53.5
52.5
54.9
56.9
56.6
55.5
56.2
53.9
54.7
54.6

SD =
SDp,,,,,,.,, =

Exp Cone =
CF =

d, (d^2

1.11 1.24

0.81 0.66

2.42 5.83

-0.31 0.10

0.75 0.56

0.86 0.73
5.63 9.12

0.872
1.074

8.44
1.46 | 0.86 |
SF6 spike =
SF6 standard :
dilution =
HC1 standard
Exp con =
0.328 0.007 2.26%
4.01 measured
12.21 =.3285/4.01
103
8.44
ppm
= 103 ppm/dilution
                                                                         Results from Table 3-7
Statistical quantities are defined in EPA Method 301, Section 6.3.

-------
 TABLE 3-11. RESULTS OF HC1 SPIKING AT APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET; RUN 3, 10/24/96.
                                                            HC1 spiking
NJ
Time
11:17
11:25
11:33
11:41
11:58
12:08
12:21
12:32
12:44
13:00
13:09
13:25







Unspiked (ppm)
56.99
59.39
60. 1 1
60.36
53.66
60.12
54.75
56.18
54.10
54.81
58.61
57.03
57.18
54.37
SD =
F =
RSD=
Bius =
t =
d; (d;)'

2.41 5.804

0.25 0.062

6.46 41.672

1.43 2.032

071 0.507

-1.58 2.483
9.68 52.561

2093
0.491
3.7
-0.088
0.12
Time
15:05
15:09
15:18
15:29
15:37
15:45
15:53
15:58
16:02
16:09
16:13
16:18







Spiked (ppm)
64.23
65.29
62.23
61.02
60.49
6141
60.21
5834
60.61
64.47
62.73
64.70
62.14

SD =
SDpooled =

Exp Cone =
CF =
dj

1.06

-1.21

093

-1.87

3.87

1.97
4.74

1466
1.807

5.05
1.02
(ds)'

1.121

1.469

0.861

3.504

14.957

3.871
25.784






SF6 spike =
SF,i standard
dilution =
HC1 standard
Exp con =
0.197 0.009
401 measured
20.377 =.1968/4.01
103 ppm
5.055 = 103 ppm/dilution
                                                                       Results from Table 3-8
Statistical quantities are defined in EPA Method 301, Section 6.3.

-------
TABLE 3-12. APG BAGHOUSE INLET HAP ESTIMATED UNCERTAINTIES (ppm)
Compound
Acetomtrile
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Allyl Chloride
Benzene
Bromoform
1.3-Butadiene
Carbonyl Sulfide
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Chloride
Ethylene Dibronude
n-Hexane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
2-Nitropropane
Propylene Dichloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1 , 1 .2-Tnchloroethane
Trichloroethylene
2.2.4-Trimethylpentane
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Bromide
Vinyl Chloride
Vmylidene Chloride
O-xylene
P-.\ylene
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Cumene
1.2-Epo.\y Butane
Ethylene Oxide
Methanol
VIethyl Chloroform
Baghouse L
Analytical Region (cm1)
3038.97 3042.42
2636.11 2875.59
968.58 974.19
899.55 965.72
3036.88 3063.07
1135.9 1154.2
895.91 919.75
2026.14 2085.23
1069.86 1103.34
2850.71 2959.43
2916.56 3041.03
1167.96 1208.92
2835.27 3005.43
2948.11 2972.53
1017.96 1020.72
1140.7 1222.63
2872.05 2994.95
11375 1232.04
1252.28 1283.79
831.47 868.5
996.86 1038
886.69 920.72
899.2 925.2
2862 2924
916.98 956.37
826.25 860.91
2861.57 3009.23
1201.77 1242.73
899.81 904.54
894.43 899.25
834.13 898.73
2859.84 3095.04
2854.43 3083.14
2171.64 2198.03
793.89 800.58
758.21 781.25
2951.21 2998.48
902.37 919.7
866.9 875
2807.91 3029.4
1057.95 1105.3
ulet (Runs 1 and 2
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
2.37E-03 26.6
2.27E-03 3.2
6.81E-03 3.5
8.61E-03 5.9
1.45E-02 7.3
8.17E-03 1.6
2.96E-03 1.0
1.77E-01 6.2
7.19E-03 3.8
3.93E-03 5.2
1.24E-02 10.0
7.52E-03 5.8
5.77E-03 0.9
6.91E-03 &.5
2.01E-03 7.1
8.33E-03 6.6
6.24E-03 2.8
l.OOE-02 1.2
2.88E-02 11.5
4.55E-03 5.4
5.51E-03 7.0
2.86E-03 2.2
3.55E-03 0.3
2.70E-03 4.6
l.OOE-02 7.6
4.71E-03 0.8
6.21E-03 0.8
1.26E-02 0.5
1.26E-03 0.6
1.18E-03 2.2
3.76E-03 2.6
1.23E-02 8.4
1.22E-02 7.2
1.95E-02 20.5
2.31E-02 0.5
4.91E-02 2.7
8.98E-03 2.5
3.14E-03 2.5
1.68E-03 0.4
8.20E-03 7.1
9.79E-03 1.8
Baghouse L
Analytical Region (cm1)
3038.97 3042.42
2636.11 2875.59
968.58 974.19
899.55 965.72
3036.88 3063.07
1135.9 1154.2
895.91 919.75
2026.14 2085.23
1069.86 1103.34
2959.43 2997.25
2916.56 3041.03
1167.96 1208.92
2835.27 3005.43
2948.11 2972.53
1017.96 1020.72
1140.7 1222.63
2872.05 2994.95
1137.5 1232.04
1252.28 1283.79
831.47 868.5
996.86 1038
886.69 920.72
899.2 925.2
2862 2924
916.98 956.37
826.25 860.91
2861.57 3009.23
1201.77 1242.73
899.81 904.54
894.43 899.25
1059.44 1113.01
2859.84 3095.04
2854.43 3083.14
2171.64 2198.03
793.89 800.58
758.21 781.25
2951.21 2998.48
902.37 919.7
866.9 875
2807.91 3029.4
1057.95 1105.3
ilet (Run 3
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
1.48E-03 29.4
2.14E-03 5.3
4.77E-03 4.3
6.31E-03 7.6
9.77E-03 8.7
6.02E-03 2.1
2.15E-03 1.2
4.18E-02 2.6
5.21E-03 4.8
4.81E-03 4.7
8.34E-03 11.8
7.15E-03 9.7
3.73E-03 1.0
4.21E-03 9.2
1.23E-03 7.7
7.95E-03 11.2
3.89E-03 3.1
8.99E-03 1.9
3.33E-02 23.6
3.43E-03 7.2
4.50E-03 10.1
2.23E-03 3.1
2.22E-03 0.4
2.43E-03 7.3
7.12E-03 9.6
3.47E-03 1.0
3.90E-03 0.9
1.13E-02 0.8
1.65E-03 1.3
l.OOE-03 3.3
6.53E-03 3.3
8.42E-03 10.2
8.48E-03 8.8
3.26E-03 6.1
2.11E-02 0.8
5.10E-02 4.9
4.91E-03 2.4
2.22E-03 3. 1
2.11E-03 1.0
5.43E-03 8.3
6.88E-03 2.3
See Section 4.8. Screening For HAPs.
                                               3-23

-------
TABLE 3-12. CONTINUED
Compound
Methyl Iodide
Methyl t-Butyl Ether
Propylene Oxide
vl-xylene
Acetone
Acetaldehyde
Acetophenone
Acrylic Acid
Aniline
Benzotrichloride
Benzyl Chloride
Bisi chloromethyllether
Chloroacetic acid
2-Chloroacteophenone
Chloromethyl methyl ether
CLloroprene
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1 .4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichloroethyl ether
1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Dichlorvos
N,N-Diethyl aniline
Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
Dimethyl formamide
1.1-Dimethyl hydrazme
Dimethyl phthalate
1,4-Dio.xane
zpichlorohydrin
Ethyl Aery late
Ethylene Dichloride
ithylidene dichloride
rormaldehyde
lexachlorobutadiene
ie.xachlorocylcopentadiene
lexachloroethane
iexamethyiphosphor amide
sophorone
.laleic Anhydride
Methyl hydrazine
Baghouse I]
Analytical Region (cm1)
1250.18 1253.53
1195 1210
2875.59 3097.75
2910.25 2952.78
1182 1255.03
2685.41 2744.4
1140.4 1286.06
1104.89 1164.68
1102.9 1123.63
866.5 877.9
3027.52 3109.06
1068.78 1154.25
1094.97 1124.12
1274.39 1285.42
1111.02 1146.08
875.9 878.8
1092.8 1114.07
1139.68 1172.77
1159.1 1185.5
1134.26 1175.42
995.96 1031.06
1109.35 1155.04
768 791
835.77 876.95
2655.32 3156.07
889.55 917.52
2824.8 2873.6
2740.77 2914.08
1157.86 1254.16
2861.1 2864.8
943.52 981.73
1181.93 1210
1227.88 1241.5
1041.11 1080.5
2788.33 2842.2
847.5 864.5
1227.02 1240.42
779.26 797.38
949.42 1019.53
2681.2 3130.6
' 885.27 905.56
2683 3061.78
ilet (Runs 1 and 2
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
2.13E-03 2.1
5.29E-03 0.9
1.32E-02 9.0
4.67E-03 3.1
1.13E-02 5.3
1.69E-03 3.0
1.60E-02 2.2
7.28E-03 1.0
3.73E-03 1.3
2.46E-03 0.5
1.93E-02 16.2
8.92E-03 1.0
4.08E-03 0.9
1.17E-02 2.3
8.52E-03 1.3
3.01E-03 0.6
3.56E-03 1.6
4.72E-03 0.9
5.22E-03 0.6
7.75E-03 9.3
3.41E-03 1.6
7.87E-03 0.9
2.77E-02 5.9
4.47E-03 0.5
1.16E-02 7.1
2.87E-03 0.8
2.48E-03 1.7
2.49E-03 1.2
1.03E-02 5.8
1.78E-03 0.3
1.01E-02 8.7
8. 14E-03 0.4
4.28E-03 2.5
1.32E-02 6.0
2.56E-03 2.7
5.58E-03 0.5
4.42E-03 0.4
2.43E-01 5.5
6.80E-03 1.0
1.18E-02 7.9
1.86E-03 0.2
8.49E-03 9.8
Baghouse Ii
Analytical Region (cm )
1250.18 1253.53
1195 1210
2875.59 3097.75
2910.25 2952.78
1182 1255.03
2685.41 2744.4
1140.4 1286.06
1104.89 - 1164.68
1102.9 1123.63
866.5 877.9
3027.52 3109.06
1068.78 1154.25
1094.97 1124.12
1274.39 1285.42
1111.02 1146.08
875.9 878.8
1092.8 1114.07
1139.68 1172.77
1159.1 1185.5
1134.26 1175.42
995.96 1031.06
1109.35 1155.04
768 791
835.77 876.95
2655.32 3156.07
889.55 917.52
2824.8 2873.6
2740.77 2914.08
1157.86 1254.16
2919.4 2921.3
943.52 981.73
1181.93 1210
1227.88 1241.5
1041.11 1080.5
2788.33 2842.2
847.5 864.5
1227.02 1240.42
779.26 797.38
949.42 1019.53
2681.2 3130.6
838.45 841,3
2683 3061.78
ilet (Run 3.
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
1.35E-03 2.3
4.21E-03 1.3
8.96E-03 10.8
3.59E-03 4.2
1.01E-02 8.4
1.62E-03 5.1
1.75E-02 4.3
5.24E-03 1.3
2.97E-03 1.8
2.27E-03 0.8
1.31E-02 19.5
6.54E-03 1.3
3.01E-03 .1.2
1.22E-02 4.3
5.96E-03 1.6
1.58E-03 0.5
2.50E-03 2.0
3.44E-03 1.2
5.67E-03 1.2
6.54E-03 13.9
2.41E-03 2.0
5.67E-03 1.2
1.95E-02 7.4
3.38E-03 0.7
7.91E-03 8.6
2.09E-03 1.0
2.29E-03 2.7
2.49E-03 2.2
9.30E-03 9.2
2.43E-04 0.1
7.77E-03 11.9
7.03E-03 0.7
3.11E-03 3.3
9.82E-03 7.8
2.45E-03 4.6
3.77E-03 0.6
3.27E-03 0.5
9.09E-02 3.6
5.26E-03 1.3
7.99E-03 9.5
1.92E-03 0.4
5.96E-03 12.2
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                                   3-24

-------
TABLE 3-12. CONTINUED
Compound
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodimethylene
N-Nitrosomorpholine
Phenol
beta-Propiolactone
Propionaldehyde
1 .2-Propylenimine
Quinoline
Styrene Oxide
1 . 1 .2.2-Tetrachloroethane
2,4-Toluene dusocyanale
o_Toluidme
1 .2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
2.4.5-TncbJorophenol
2,4.6-Tnchlorophenol
Tnethylamine
Ammonia
Baghouse L
Analytical Region (on1)
779.31 783.55
841.7 861.39
928 1085.28
892.23 1024.64
1162.67 1195.76
860.13 957.64
2546.18 3114.35
817.57 821.31
800.19 803.73
861.39 903.93
794.92 824.07
2254.7 2301.18
2858.5 2951.85
1086.21 1114.37
1178.04 1204.16
856.27 863.36
2756.62 2839.34
893.1 - 926
ilet (Runs 1 and 2
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
3.82E-03 0.4
5.14E-03 2.1
1.01E-02 3.3
7.65E-03 3.2
8.00E-03 1.3
7.19E-03 1.6
9.40E-03 10.6
3.25E-03 1.5
1.21E-02 1.9
2.45E-03 1.8
1.30E-02 3.1
2.74E-02 0.4
3.60E-03 3.1
4.22E-03 1.1
8.38E-03 2.7
2.67E-03 0.7
2.38E-03 1.1
3.36E-03 2.2
Baghouse li
Analytical Region (cm1)
779.31 783.55
841.7 861.39
928 1085.28
892.23 1024.64
998.4 999.9
860.13 957.64
2546.18 3114.35
817.57 821.31
800.19 803.73
861.39 903.93
794.92 824.07
881.58 911.51
2858.5 2951.85
1086.21 1114.37
1178.04 1204.16
856.27 863.36
2756.62 2839.34
893.1 - 926
nlet (Run 3
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
5.44E-03 1.0
3.53E-03 2.6
7.72E-03 4.5
5.82E-03 4.4
1.85E-04 1.7
5.32E-03 2.1
6.38E-03 12.8
2.13E-03 1.7
7.43E-03 2. 1
2.60E-03 3.4
1.14E-02 4.8
2.44E-03 3.4
2.96E-03 4.6
3.04E-03 1.4
7.20E-03 4.1
2.42E-03 1.1
2.45E-03 1.9
2.08E-03 2.4
See Section 4.8. Screening For HAPs.
                                                 3-25

-------
TABLE 3-13. APG BAGHOUSE OUTLET. HAP ESTIMATED UNCERTAINTIES
Compound
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Allyl Chloride
Benzene
Bromoform
1,3-Butadiene
Carbonyl Sulfide
Chloro benzene
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Chloride
Ethylene Dibromide
n-Hexane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
2-NItropropane
Propylene Dichloride
Styrene
Tetrachloioethylene
Toluene
1 . 1 .2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
2.2.4-Trimethylpentane
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Bromide
Vinyl Chloride
Vinylidene Chloride
O-xylene
P-xylene
Carbon Disulfide
Baghouse O
Analytical Region (cm1)
3038.97
2636.11
968.58
899.55
3036.88
1135.9
895.91
2026.14
1069.86
2850.71
2916.56
1167.96
2835.27
2948.11
1017.96
1140.7
2872.05
1137.5
743.96
831.47
996.86
886.69
899.2
2862
916.98
826.25
2861.57
1201.77
899.81
894.43
1059.44
2859.84
2854.43
2171.64
- 3042.42
2875.59
974.19
- 965.72
3063.07
1154.2
919.75
2085.23
1103.34
2959.43
- 3041.03
- 1208.92
3005.43
2972.53
1020.72
1222.63
2994.95
1232.04
769.17
868.5
1038
920.72
925.2
2924
956.37
- 860.91
3009.23
1242.73
904.54
- 899.25
1113.01
3095.04
- 3083.14
2198.03
utlet, Runs
RMSD
1.2E-03
2.0E-03
6.7E-03
8.4E-03
1.9E-02
6.4E-03
2.7E-03
6.4E-02
6.8E-03
4.2E-03
1.5E-02
9.3E-03
7.5E-03
8.0E-03
2.2E-03
9.8E-03
8.1E-03
1.2E-02
1.2E-01
5.0E-03
6.0E-03
2.5E-03
3.0E-03
2.5E-03
9.9E-03
5.3E-03
8.2E-03
1.6E-02
l.OE-03
9.5E-04
8.8E-03
1.5E-02
1.5E-02
6.9E-03
land 2
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
13.4
2.9
3.4
5.7
9.8
1.3
0.9
2.2
3.6
5.5
12.2
7.1
1.2
9.8
7.6
7.8
3.7
1.4
12.1
5.9
7.6
2.0
0.3
4.3
7.5
0.9
1.1
0.6
0.5
1.7
2.5
10.5
9.1
7.3
RMSD
1.7E-03
1.9E-03
4.1E-03
6.2E-03
8.9E-03
5.3E-03
2.4E-03
3.9E-02
4.7E-03
4.3E-03
7.7E-03
5.7E-03
3.3E-03
3.8E-03
8.4E-04
6.6E-03
3.4E-03
7.3E-03
2.9E-02
3.0E-03
3.8E-03
2.3E-03
2.4E-03
2.3E-03
7.0E-03
2.9E-03
3.5E-03
9.1E-03
1.6E-03
1.2E-03
5.8E-03
7.8E-03
7.8E-03
7.4E-03
Run 3
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
32.9
4.7
3.7
7.5
7.9
1.9
1.4
2.4
4.4
4.2
10.9
7.7
0.9
8.2
5.2
9.3
2.8
1.5
20.7
6.3
8.4
3.2
0.4
6.8
9.4
0.9
0.8
0.6
1.2
3.8
3.0
9.4
8.2
13.7
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                         3-26

-------
TABLE 3-13. CONTINUED
Compound
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Cumene
1.2-Epoxy Butane
Ethylene Oxide
Methanol
Methyl Chloroform
Methyl Iodide
Methyl t-Butyl Ether
Propylene Oxide
M-xylene
Acetone
Acetaldehyde
Acetophenone
Acrylic Acid
Aniline
Benzotrichloride
Benzyl Chloride
BisCchloromethyl)ether
Chloroacetic acid
2-Chloroacteophenone
Chloromethyl methyl ether
Chloroprene
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1.4- Dichloro benzene
Dichloroethyl ether
1 .3-E*ichloropropene
Dichlorvos
N.N-Diethyl aniline
E>imethyl carbamoyl chloride
E>imethyl formamide
1 1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine
Baghouse O
Analytical Region (cm'1)
793.89 800.58
758.21 781.25
2951.21 2998.48
902.37 919.7
866.9 875
2807.91 3029.4
1057.95 1105.3
1250.18 1253.53
1195 1210
2875.59 3097.75
2910.25 2952.78
1182 - 1255.03
2685.41 2744.4
1140.4 1286.06
1104.89 1164.68
1102.9 1123.63
866.5 877.9
3027.52 3109.06
1068.78 1154.25
1094.97 1124.12
1274.39 1285.42
1111.02 1146.08
875.9 878.8
1092.8 1114.07
1139.68 1172.77
1159.1 1185.5
1134.26 1175.42
995.96 1031.06
1109.35 1155.04
768 791
835.77 876.95
2655.32 3156.07
889.55 917.52
2824.8 2873.6
2740.77 2914.08
utlet, Runs 1 and 2
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
2.6E-02 0.5
4.9E-02 2.7
1.2E-02 3.3
2.8E-03 2.2
1.3E-03 0.3
9.7E-03 8.4
9.2E-03 1.7
6.7E-04 0.7
6.2E-03 1.1
1.6E-02 11.2
5.1E-03 3.3
1.4E-02 6.5
1.3E-03 2.3
1.9E-02 2.6
6.2E-03 0.8
4.8E-03 1.6
1.6E-03 0.3
2.5E-02 20.8
8.2E-03 0.9
4.4E-03 1.0
1.4E-02 2.8
7.1E-03 1.1
2.6E-03 0.5
3.6E-03 1.6
3.6E-03 0.7
6.0E-03 0.7
7.6E-03 9.1
3.3E-03 1.5
6.7E-03 0.8
2.7E-02 5.9
4.7E-03 0.6
1.5E-02 9.1
2.4E-03 0.6
2.2E-03 1.5
2.4E-03 1.2
Run 3
Estimated
RMSD Uncertainty (ppm)
1.6E-02 0.6
4.7E-02 4.5
4.4E-03 2.1
2.5E-03 3.5
1.9E-03 0.9
5.0E-03 7.6
6.1E-03 2.1
1.3E-03 2.2
3.2E-03 1.0
8.2E-03 9.9
3.2E-03 3.7
8.2E-03 6.8
1.7E-03 5.2
1.5E-02 3.7
4.4E-03 1.0
2.3E-03 1.4
1.8E-03 0.6
1.2E-02 17.7
5.7E-03 1.2
2.7E-03 1.1
1.1E-02 3.9
4.9E-03 1.3
1.2E-03 0.4
2.2E-03 1.8
3.3E-03 1.1
4.7E-03 1.0
5.5E-03 11.8
2.2E-03 1.8
4.8E-03 1.0
1.7E-02 6.5
3.0E-03 0.7
7.2E-03 7.8
2.3E-03 1.1
1.9E-03 2.2
2.2E-03 1.9
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                              3-27

-------
TABLE 3-13. CONTINUED
Compound
Dimethyl phthakte
1,4-Dioxane
Epichlorohydrin
Ethyl Aery late
Ethylene Bichloride
Ethylidene dichloride
Formaldehyde
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocylcopentadiene
Hexachloroe thane
Hexamethylphosphoramide
Maleic Anhydride
Methyl hydrazine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N- Nitro so dime thy lene
N- Nitro somorpho line
Phenol
beta-Propiolactone
Propionaldehyde
1,2-Propylenimine
Quinoline
Styrene Oxide
1 . 1 ,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
2.4-Toluene diisocyanate
o_Tohiidine
1.2.4-Trichloro benzene
2.4.5-Trichlorophenol
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol
Triethylamine
Ammonia
Baghouse O
Analytical Region (cm" )
1157.86
2919.4
943.52
1181.93
1227.88
1041.11
2788.33
847.5
1227.02
779.26
949.42
885.27
2683
779.31
841.7
928
892.23
1162.67
860.13
2546.18
817.57
800.19
861.39
794.92
881.58
2858.5
1086.21
1178.04
856.27
2756.62
893.1
1254.16
2921.3
981.73
1210
1241.5
1080.5
2842.2
864.5
1240.42
797.38
1019.53
905.56
3061.78
783.55
861.39
- 1085.28
1024.64
1195.76
957.64
3114.35
821.31
803.73
903.93
824.07
911.51
2951.85
1114.37
1204.16
863.36
2839.34
926
utlet, Runs
RMSD
1.3E-02
4.7E-04
9.8E-03
9.8E-03
5.2E-03
1.3E-02
2.5E-03
6.4E-03
5.4E-03
1.6E-01
6.6E-03
1.8E-03
1.1E-02
5.7E-03
5.9E-03
l.OE-02
7.5E-03
9.6E-03
6.9E-03
1.2E-02
2.8E-03
1.5E-02
2.0E-03
1.4E-02
2.3E-03
3.8E-03
4.2E-03
l.OE-02
1.9E-03
2.3E-03
2.8E-03
land 2
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
7.0
0.1
8.5
0.5
3.1
5.8
2.6
0.6
0.4
3.7
0.9
0.2
12.2
0.6
2.5
3.3
3.2
1.6
1.5
13.3
1.3
2.3
1.4
3.4
1.9
3.3
1.1
3.3
0.5
1.0
1.8
RMSD
7.5E-03
2.5E-04
7.5E-03
5.4E-03
2.5E-03
8.2E-03
2.2E-03
3.1E-03
2.6E-03
7.4E-02
5.2E-03
3.0E-03
7.3E-03
2.2E-03
5.5E-03
4.2E-03
2.8E-03
6.7E-03
5.4E-03
6.1E-03
5.2E-03
5.9E-03
1.5E-03
4.3E-03
2.4E-03
8.7E-03
2.6E-03
2.7E-03
2.7E-03
5.5E-03
2.2E-03
Run 3
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
7.5
0.1
11.5
0.5
2.6
6.6
4.1
0.5
0.4
2.9
1.3
0.4
11.2
0.8
2.1
3.9
4.1
1.7
2.0
11.8
1.2
1.2
3.2
3.7
3.6
4.1
1.2
3.2
1.0
1.7
2.6
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                            3-28

-------
TABLE 3-14. APG COOLING STACK.
Compound
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Allyl Chloride
Benzene
Bromoform
1.3-Butadiene
Carbonyl Sulfide
Chloro benzene
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Chloride
Ethylene Dibromide
n-Hexane
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methylene Chloride
2-Nitropropane
Propylene E>ichloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1. 1,2-Trichloro ethane
Trichloroethylene
2. 2,4-Trimethy Ipentane
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Bromide
Vinyl Chloride
Vinylidene Chloride
O-xylene
P-xylene
Carbon Disulfide
Analytical
1041.4
913.7
968.58
899.55
3036.88
1135.9
895.91
2026.14
1069.86
2959.43
943.43
1167.96
2835.27
2948.11
1017.96
1140.7
2872.05
1137.5
743.96
831.47
996.86
974.29
899.2
3018.19
916.98
919.7
2861.57
1132.83
939.59
894.43
1059.44
2859.84
770.61
2171.64
Cooling Sta
Region (cm1)
1042.88
1000.35
974.19
965.72
3063.07
1154.2
919.75
- 2085.23
1103.34
2997.25
1000.16
1208.92
3005.43
2972.53
1020.72
1222.63
2994.95
1232.04
769.17
868.5
1038
1006.59
925.2
3054.7
956.37
- 959.88
3009.23
1161.19
944.72
899.25
- 1113.01
3095.04
- 819.06
- 2198.03
ck
RMSD
3.3E-04
8.3E-04
3.0E-04
9.7E-04
3.0E-03
1.1E-03
9.9E-04
3.7E-03
6.9E-04
2.0E-03
5.7E-04
1.9E-03
1.9E-03
2.2E-03
2.7E-04
2.0E-03
2.1E-03
2.4E-03
2.8E-03
1.4E-03
8.7E-04
4.6E-04
9.9E-04
3.7E-03
9.2E-04
8.6E-04
2.0E-03
l.OE-03
2.8E-04
2.1E-04
8.4E-04
3.1E-03
2.3E-03
1.1E-03
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
1.84
0.57
0.16
0.66
1.51
0.22
0.32
0.13
0.36
1.13
0.86
1.48
0.29
2.72
0.95
1.57
0.93
0.29
0.29
1.71
1.10
0.62
0.10
1.87
0.70
0.18
0.25
0.09
0.10
0.39
0.24
2.12
1.39
1.11
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                              3-29

-------
TABLE 3-14.  CONTINUED
Compound
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Cumene
1.2-Epoxy Butane
Ethylene Oxide
Methanol
Methyl Chloroform
Methyl Iodide
Methyl t-Butyl Ether
Propylene Oxide
M-xylene
Acetone
Acetaldehyde
Acetophenone
Acrylic Acid
Aniline
Benzotrichloride
Benzyl Chloride
Bis(chloromethyl)ether
Chloroacedc acid
2- Chloroacteophenone
Chloromethyl methyl ether
Chloroprene
o-Cresol
m-Cresol
p-Cresol
1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1.4- Dichloro benzene
Dichloroethyl ether
1 . 3 -Dichloro propene
Dichlorvos
N.N-Diethyl aniline
Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
Dimethyl formamide
1, 1-Dimethyl hydrazine
Cooling Sta
Analytical Region (cm ')
793.89
758.21
2951.21
902.37
866.9
2807.91
1057.95
1250.18
1070.6
2875.59
2910.25
1182
1092.5
1140.4
1104.89
1102.9
866.5
3027.52
1068.78
1094.97
1274.39
1111.02
875.9
1092.8
1139.68
1159.1
1134.26
995.96
1109.35
768
967.79
2655.32
1068.78
1057.8
885.12
800.58
- 781.25
2998.48
919.7
875
3029.4
1105.3
1253.53
1109
3097.75
2952.78
1255.03
1141
- 1286.06
1164.68
1123.63
877.9
3109.06
1154.25
1124.12
1285.42
1146.08
878.8
1114.07
1172.77
1185.5
1175.42
1031.06
1155.04
791
- 1000.25
3156.07
1114.47
1103.9
936.33
ck
RMSD
3.3E-03
1.5E-03
2.2E-03
9.9E-04
4.5E-04
2.4E-03
7.5E-04
5.4E-04
7.7E-04
3.3E-03
2.1E-03
3.2E-03
1.1E-03
4.2E-03
l.OE-03
l.OE-03
4.9E-04
4.3E-03
9.3E-04
l.OE-03
4.0E-03
1.1E-03
9.1E-05
7.7E-04
9.6E-04
1.5E-03
1.7E-03
7.2E-04
1.1E-03
1.4E-03
4.4E-04
3.5E-03
7.5E-04
7.5E-04
1.2E-03
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
0.07
0.08
0.60
0.78
0.12
2.07
0.14
0.53
0.14
2.26
1.39
1.52
1.65
0.59
0.14
0.36
0.10
3.64
0.11
0.23
0.79
0.17
0.02
0.35
0.18
0.17
2.01
0.33
0.13
0.31
0.07
2.12
0.11
0.18
0.56
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                            3-30

-------
TABLE 3-14. CONTINUED
Compound
Dimethyl phthalate
1,4-Dioxane
Epichlorohy drin
Ethyl Acrykte
Ethylene Dichloride
Ethylidene dichloride
Formaldehyde
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocylcopentadiene
Hexachloroe thane
Hexamethylphosphoramide
Hydrochloric Acid
Isophorone
Maleic Anhydride
Methyl hydrazine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodimethylene
N- Nitro somorpho Hne
Phenol
beta-Propiolactone
Propionaldehy de
1 .2-Propylenimine
Quinoline
Styrene Oxide
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroe thane
2.4-Toluene diisocyanate
o_Toluidine
1 , 2,4-Trichloro benzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenel
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol
Triethylamine
Ammonia
Analytical
1157.86
2861.1
943.52
1181.93
1227.88
1041.11
2788.33
976.9
1136.92
779.26
949.42
2817.35
2681.2
838.45
2683
779.31
841.7
928
892.23
1162.67
1034.68
2546.18
817.57
800.19
861.39
794.92
1066.71
2858.5
1086.21
1178.04
856.27
2756.62
893.1
Cooling Sta
Region (cm1)
1254.16
2864.8
981.73
1210
1241.5
1080.5
- 2842.2
997.7
1148.34
797.38
1019.53
2823.26
3130.6
841.3
3061.78
783.55
861.39
1085.28
1024.64
1195.76
1152.25
3114.35
821.31
803.73
903.93
824.07
1086.8
2951.85
1114.37
1204.16
863.36
2839.34
926
ck
RMSD
3.1E-03
6.9E-04
5.7E-04
1.9E-03
2.0E-03
9.9E-04
l.OE-03
4.5E-04
6.9E-04
1.9E-03
5.4E-04
4.5E-04
3.3E-03
4.3E-04
2.7E-03
6.9E-04
1.7E-03
1.4E-03
l.OE-03
2.1E-03
1.2E-03
3.7E-03
5.0E-04
l.OE-03
7.1E-04
2.2E-03
5.4E-04
1.7E-03
8.0E-04
1.9E-03
5.8E-04
1.1E-03
l.OE-03
Estimated
Uncertainty (ppm)
1.75
0.11
0.49
0.10
1.16
0.44
1.06
0.07
0.13
0.04
0.08
0.47
2.23
0.04
3.09
0.07
0.72
0.45
0.43
0.35
0.23
4.22
0.23
0.16
0.53
0.52
0.45
1.52
0.21
0.60
0.15
0.50
0.66
See Section 4.8, Screening For HAPs.
                                             3-31

-------
                  275
                                           SO2 (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet

                                                   Run 1 (10/22/96)
                            i-  CM
                                                          Time of day
U)
K)
                                            CO (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                                   Run 1 (10/22/96)
            CQ



            .SP -M*
              •§  1000!'
                  -500
                                 c\   c
                                         CO
                                                         Time of day
             Figure 3-1.  Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 1, 10/22/96

-------
                                           HC1 (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                                   Run 1 (10/22/96)
UJ
OJ
           c
           1
           
                                                         Time of day
                Figure 3-2.  Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 1, 10/22/96

-------
      300
"c «  100
 * 3
 g §   50
 a
 a
                                SO2 (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                        Run 2 (10/23/96)
      1600
CB     1400 -
I £,  1200 -
'S  .5  1000
rr  m
•a  •£   800
«  |   600
I, 3   40°
««     200
         0 -f
                                               Time of day
                                   CO (ppm)at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                          Run 2 (10/23/96)
                                               Time of day
              Figure 3-3. Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 2, 10/23/96

-------
                                        11(1 (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                                Run 2 (10/23/96)
           1
OJ
                                                     Time of day
                        Figure 3-4.  HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 2, 10/23/96

-------
Os
                 300
                                           SO2 (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                                  Run 3 (10/24/96)
                                                         Time of day
                                           CO (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet
                                                  Run 3 (10/24/96)
                                                         Time of day
                            Figure 3-5.  Concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 3, 1O/24/96

-------
-10
                              HCI (ppm) at APG Baghouse Inlet

                                      Run 3 (10/24/96)


1
o
1
ft
C
1
a

OL/
70 -
60
50
40

30 -

20

10 -

- 1
•






,

   in   T-  CM
                                                                       r--  r-  •*!•  CM  oo  CM  CM
                                                                       T-  co  m  i-  CM  •<*  T-
   OO   T-
                        cr  co
                                        LO  in  in  CD  CD  to
                                                                       en  oo  oo  o>
                                                                                     o>
                                                                                           o
                                                                                           CM
                                            Time of day
               Figure 3-6.  HCI concentrations at APG baghouse inlet. Run 3, 10/24/96

-------
             CO


             oe £»

            '3 c
            "S "*-
             C 'W
             a
             a,
60



50 -



40



30 -



20



10



 0 +
-10


  10:
                                  SO2 Concentrations at APG Baghouse Outlet. Runl, 10/22/96
                       30     11:30     12:30     13:30     14:30     15:30



                                                           Time of Day
                                                        16:30
17:30
18:30
19:30
u>
oo
                   2980
                    -20


                       10:30
                                  CO Concentrations at APG Baghouse Outlet. Runl, 10/22/96
            11:30     12:30     13:30    14:30     15:30     16:30     17:30    18:30



                                       Time of Day
                 19:30
                           Figure 3-7. Concentrations at APG baghouse outlet.  Run 1, 10/22/96

-------
             HCI (ppm) at APG Baghouse Outlet
                     Run 1 (10/22/96)
                           Time of day
Figure 3-8. HCI concentrations at APG baghouse outlet.  Run 1, 10/22/96

-------
u>
o
           en
           * £
           I 8
           a 3
 70
 60
 50
 40
 30
 20
 10
  0 +
-10
  10:
                     00
                     -20
                                 SO2 Concentrations at APG Baghouse Outlet. Run2, 10/23/96
11:00       12:00      13:00       14:00       15:00
                           Time of Day
16:00
17:00
                                 CO Concentrations at APG Baghouse Outlet. Run2, 10/23/96
                       10:00      11:00       12:00      13:00      14:00
                                                           Time of Day
                                            15:00
 16:00
17:00
                              Figure 3-9.  Concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 2, 1O/23/96

-------
               HC1 (ppm) at APG Baghouse Outlet
                       Run 2 (10/23/96)
                                   HC1 Spiked Samples, 14:00 to 15:34
                            Time of day
Figure 3-10.  HC1 concentrations at APG baghouse outlet. Run 2,  10/23/96

-------
OJ
-k
to
                                    SO2 Concentrations at APG Baghouse Outlet.  Run 3, 10/24/96
                    70
                    60  -
                    50
03
WO £>
•S  C  40
I  a
              a
              a
      30  -
      20 -
      10
       0 +
      -10
        10
                                                                                          4-
                       :00
11:00    12:00   13:00    14:00   15:00    16:00   17:00    18:00   19:00   20:00   21:00
                                Time of Day


       CO Concentrations at APG Baghouse Outlet. Run 3, 10/24/96
                   1900  -
             CS
                   -100
                      10:00    11:00   12:00   13:00    14:00   15:00    16:00   17:00   18:00   19.00   20:00    21:00
                                                             Time of Day
                            Figure 3-11. Concentrations at APG baghouse outlet.  Run 3, 10/24/96

-------
80
70
       Condenser Sample
-10
       r^  co  oo  i-
       -i-  co  m  c\j
                                 HCI (ppm) at APG Baghouse Outlet

                                          Run 3 (10/24/96)
                                HCI Spiked Samples,  14:22 to 16:44
++4
I  I I  I I  I  I I
             T-  CvJ C\J  CO  CO
                                Tj-TtinininincDcocoi^r^-i-~-ooooooooo5
                                                                                          CD o  o
                                                                                          •«- cvj  eg
                                              Time of day
              Figure 3-12. HCI concentrations at APG baghouse outlet.  Run 3, 10/24/96

-------
4.0 FTIR TEST PROCEDURES

A heated sample delivery system (Figure 4-1) was used to extract flue gas through a
stainless steel probe and transport the flowing sample gas through a heated teflon sampling line
to a heated gas distribution manifold. Valves in the manifold were used to direct the sample flow
(or a calibration standard) to the FTIR gas cell.
4.1 SAMPLING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
This description refers to Figure 4-1.
4.1.1 Sampling System Components
The sample was extracted through a single port using a 4-ft long, 0.5-in diameter stainless
steel probe. Sample was transported through heated 3/8-in Teflon line using a KNF Neuberger
heated head sample pump (Model NO35 ST.l II). A Balston paniculate filter (holder Model
Number 30-25, filter element Model Number 100-25-BH, 99 percent removal efficiency at
0.1 /xm) was connected in-line at the outlet of the sample probe. The sample line was heat
wrapped and insulated. Temperature controllers were used to monitor and regulate the sample
line temperature at about 350°F.
The sample pump outlet was connected to the sample manifold. The sample stream
passed through a secondary Balston paniculate filter immediately after entering the manifold
box. The manifold is constructed of stainless steel 3/8-in tubing and contains 4-way valves and
heated rotameters (0 to 20 LPM) to allow the operator to control sample flow to the FTIR cell. A
heated 1/4-in diameter 20-ft long Teflon jumper line connected the manifold to the inlet of the
FTIR gas cell. The manifold was maintained at 300° to 310°F.
4-1

-------
                                         Heated
                                     Sample ManltoM
                  V«*M    -4
                  VM* 91    -4
                        Heated
                      Probe Box
Baghous* Intel
  Prob*«2
                     SpNn Urn
                                        Baltton
                                         Filter
Flow meter
 Unheated Line

- Heated Line
                                                              Heated bundle*
                                          Svnpl.Un.t1
                                                   '
                                                             100'
                                                  Um fl
                                                                                            20'
                                                                                              20'
                                                                                                                        O» Um
                                                                                                                     On MvUfoM
                                  To CaUbratfon O»
                                     CyUmtara
                               Figure 4-1. FTIR sampling system configuration for test at APG Lime Plant.

-------
4.1.2 Sample Conditioning
Some samples were passed through a chilled condenser system to remove moisture before
going to the FTIR cell. The condenser inlet was connected to a second outlet of the gas
distribution manifold through a another heated 1/4-in Teflon. A 4-way valve on the manifold
controlled sample flow to the condenser. The condenser outlet was connected by a Teflon line to
the inlet of the FTIR gas cell.
Since the condenser is not effective for measuring HC1 or other water-soluble
compounds, it was not used extensively. The primary benefit of the condenser is in lowering
moisture to better reveal spectral features of gas phase compounds, such NOX and SO2.
4.2 SAMPLING PROCEDURE
This test required two sampling configurations.
4.2.1 Testing Two Locations Simultaneously
The inlet and outlet to the baghouse were sampled with the configuration shown in
Figure 4-1. Two separate sample lines, probes, and pumps were used, one for each location.
Both sampling lines were connected to the common sampling manifold. Each line had a pressure
gauge at the manifold inlet and a rotameter at the manifold outlet. A vent turn-valve was used to
independently control and monitor the total sample flow through either sample line. The 4-way
valves, at the manifold outlet leading to the FTIR cell and leading to the condenser, could be
turned to select gas from sample line 1, gas from sample line 2, calibration standard gas, or could
be closed.
The baghouse outlet sample probe was connected to a heated box that contained the
initial Balston paniculate filter. The initial particulate filter at the baghouse inlet probe was
wrapped in heat tape and insulated. The gas temperature at the inlet was about 500°F so it was
necessary to let the gas cool in the unheated probe to about 350°F before reaching the Teflon
line. Each location was within 100-ft of the FTIR trailer position.
A 100-ft spike line went to each location and connected to the sample line at a "tee" just
upstream of the particulate filter. Spike flow to either location was controlled by the mass flow
meter at the outlet to the calibration manifold. Spike flow to the baghouse inlet could be turned
on or off with a 2-way valve in the FTIR trailer. Spike flow to the baghouse outlet sample line
was turned on or off with a 3-way valve in the heated probe box. For each location the spike and

4-3

-------
sample lines were contained in the same heated bundle and the temperature was regulated by the
same heat controller. Either sample line could be spiked with the pre-heated HC1 standard at a
controlled dilution ratio.
4.2.2 Testing a Single Location
The cooling stack was sampled alone. This configuration was the same as that shown in
Figure 4-1 for the baghouse outlet location. The same spike line and valve configuration were
also used.
4.3 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Figure 4-2 is a schematic showing the FTIR instrument configuration and connections
with the sample manifold and condenser.
Because HC1 was prominent in the emissions, most of the measurements were performed
using a batch sampling procedure to collect a spectrum of a static sample. Some measurements
were performed with the sample flowing through the cell. Some samples were diluted in the cell
with dry nitrogen and some were passed through a condenser.
4.3.1 Batch Sampling
The batch sampling procedure was used to collect samples in the FTIR cell (Section 8.7.1
in EPA Method 320 in Appendix D and reference 1). Sample gas continuously flowed from the
probe through the sample line, through the manifold and out a manifold vent (Figure 4-1). The
4-way valve on the manifold was turned to fill the FTIR cell to ambient pressure, which was
about 720 mm Hg. The total flow meter before the vent was monitored to ensure that a positive
flow was always directed out the vent during sampling. The cell inlet valve was then closed to
isolate the sample and the sample spectrum was recorded. Then the cell was evacuated for the
next sample.
4.3.2 Flow Through Measurements
The cell was filled as in the batch sampling procedure. The sample inlet valve was kept
open and the cell outlet valve was also opened to allow gas to pass through the cell. The sample
was maintained at ambient pressure by having the outlet valve partially open to the vacuum
pump. The inlet sample flow valve was adjusted until the pressure gauge was stable at ambient
pressure. The spectrum of the sample was recorded, and then the cell was evacuated for the next
sample.