-------
Biology of Zooplankton Communities
PROTOZOA
Difflugia
Amoebae
Codonella
Stentor
Epistylis
Ciliates
-------
Biology of Zooplankton Communities
Synchaeta
Cladocera
ROTIFERA
Polygarthra
ARTHROPODA
Crustacea
Nauplius larva of copepod
Brachionus
Copepoda
Insecta - Chaoborus
-------
Biology of Zooplankton Communitie s
PLANKTON1C BIVALVE LARVAE
380(0,
spined (fin attached)
simple (gill attached)
Glochidia (Unionidae) Fish Parasites
(1-3)
veliger
pediveliger
Veliger Larvae (Corbiculidae) Free Living Planktonic
(4-5)
Pediveliger attaches byssus lines)
-------
MACRO INVERTEBRATES
I INTRODUCTION
Groups included are in general those which
may be seen and recognized without the use
of a microscope. For a more restricted
definition in reference to bottom sampling,
they are defined as those invertebrates re-
tained on a No. 30 sieve (approx. 0. 5 mm
aperture).
H PHYLUM PORIFERA - Sponges
A Often encountered in the "pipe-moss"
complex. Being true animals, they will
grow in the dark and hence require only
a water possessing adequate food materials.
B Freshwater sponges usually appear as
brownish or greenish masses, (where
containing zoochlorellae), irregular in
shape, growing on twigs or solid surfaces.
Erect or branching shapes sometimes
found. Surface non-shiny, texture delicate.
May form overgrowths on irrigation
canal walls.
Microscopic structure characterized by
silica "spicules" and reproductive
structures known as "gemmules".
1 Spicules are in general long slender
crystals. In some, the ends are simple
or pointed, in others expanded into
various shapes.
2 Spicules of various types are interwoven
like the twigs of a bird nest to form the
skeleton of the sponge. The nature of
the soft living tissue cells indicate a
probable evolutionary origin of the
sponge from flagellated and amoeboid
protozoa.
3 Gemmules are little bundles of tissue
cells, protected by spicules, which can
resist unfavorable conditions. They are
often found scattered throughout the
mass of a sponge. These are analagous
to turions in some aquatic plants and
statoblasts in bryozoans. ,
in PHYLUM COELENTERATA - The Jellyfishes,
Corals, and Hydras
A This group is of relatively little importance
in fresh water, although quite prominent
in the ocean.
B The freshwater hydra is a typical and
simple coelenterate. Its structure is
essentially a long slender sac, two'layers
thick, with tentacles extending out from
around the open end or mouth.
1 Fully extended individuals may measure
a half inch or more.
2 Generally an indicator of clean water.
Rarely a nuisance.
C Craspedacusta, a freshwater jellyfish
occasionally appears in great numbers
in lakes and reservoirs in late summer.
No particular nuisance conditions are
known to result, although tastes and odors
might be expected if sufficient numbers
were taken into a water treatment plant.
No reasons are known for their sporadic
appearances, no public health significance
is known, and no control measures can be
recommended.
D. Cordylophora, a colonial hydroid is
a typical attached organism in large
rivers, lakes, and reservoirs.
IV PHYLUM PLATYHELMINTHES -
Tapeworms, Flukes, and Planarias
A Tapeworms and flukes are serious human
parasites in many parts of the world, but
generally under good control in North
America. Most of them have relatively
complicated life histories involving one
or more "intermediate" hosts and a "final"
host.
BI;AQ. 16d.5.71
9-1
-------
Macro Invertebrates
B The human tapeworm Diphyllobothrium
latum is a form of modest significance,
endemic to our northern states.
1 It is the largest of the human tapeworms.
2 It is obtained by eating underdone fish
of the pike family.
C Human fluke parasites have certain species
of snails as intermediate hosts. Larval
forms, cercariae released from
snails penetrate human skin directly
while the person is wading or bathing in
infested waters.
1 Although one or two species of snail in
southern United States are thought to be
capable of transmitting the human blood
fluke, none are known to do so at the
present time.
2 Flukes also parasitize other animals
than man. Occasionally the cercaria
larvae of non-human parasites will be
attracted to humans bathing in infested
waters. They are able to enter the skin
but cannot complete penetration, and so
are trapped. The result is a rash, often
quite painful, known as "swimmer's
itch". This now occurs widely across
the northern states and in many coastal
waters. Control measures are directed
at the elimination of species of snails.
D The Planarians (Class Turbellaria) are
large enough to spot with the naked eye.
They are useful field indicators of pollution,
but shrivel up on preservation, and are
seldom recognized in the laboratory.
V PHYLUM BRYOZOA - Moss Animals
A These are small, colonial, sessile animals,
common in both marine and fresh waters.
Their main significance is as contributors
to the pipe-moss complex, and as indicators
of the degree of pollution.
B Freshwater forms are usually either
creeping brown moss-like forms that
grow over the undersides of rocks or
in pipes, or larger gelatinous masses
growing on sticks and rocks in lakes and
reservoirs.
1 The closely adhering threads on rocks
or pipes may range up to I/16th of an
inch in width. Microscopic examination
reveals numerous raised openings from
which when undisturbed, tiny fans of
tentacles (the lophophore) are extended.
Closely packed colonies may reach an
inch in depth, and if adjacent colonies
have come into contact, an indefinite
area may be covered.
2 Another type produces clear jelly-like
masses of transparent or faintly tinted
material, with minute, often colored,
individuals (zooids) scattered over the
surface. The animals are extremely
timid and only with great care and
patience can they be observed with the
tentacles expanded. Colonies of some
species are reported to approach six
feet in length, but smaller forms are
more common. Certain types of
colonies can slowly change their position.
3 Reproduction is by means of unique
structure known as a "statoblast".
This is a discoid or eleptical structure,
often with anchor-shaped hooks, which
can resist winter conditions and even
drying. Statoblasts usually germinate
in spring, colonies reach full develop-
ment by late summer.
VI PHYLUM MOLLUSCA - Snails, Clams,
also Oysters, Squids, Octopi
A Freshwater molluscs, are in general
animals with a soft body, encased in a
calcareous shell which may be single
(snails) or double (clams and mussels).
Marine forms such as the squid, nautilus,
octopus, slugs, and others, would require
additional qualification.
B In the snail group (Class Gastropoda) the
shell may be coiled in various ways, or a
simple tent-shaped secretion on the
animal's back. These animals possess a
distinct head, with a pair of contractile
tentacles, at the base of which are placed
the eyes. .
1 The mouth is provided with a unique
flexible rasp-like structure, the radula.
Chitinous jaws too are usually present.
9-2
-------
Macro -Invertebrates
2 The two main groups in freshwater
are the air breathers (Order Pulmonata)
and the water breathers (Order
Streptoneura). Since all Streptoneura
have a peculiar chitinous or calcareous
"trap door" called an operculum (used
for closing the shell) they are also called
the "operculate" snails (vs the
"nonoperculate" Pulmonata).
3 Many snails are classed as "nuisance
organisms".
a Snails are quick to take advantage of
organic enrichment. As pollution
eliminates predators, pulmonate
snails (such as Physa, Lymnea) thrive.
Trickling filters, polluted streams,
and similar locations are often nearly
choked with these organisms.
b Certain snails are also the inter-
mediate host for certain fluke
parasites as mentioned elsewhere,
and hence may constitute an important
link in the control of these parasites.
The Bivalved Molluscs (Class Bivalvia)
have the body protected by two symmetrical,
opposing valves or shells, which are united
above by a flexible elastic tissue called
the "ligament, " which is also secreted by
the mantle.
1 They have no head. The foot is an
axe-shaped mass of muscular tissue
which may be extended and used to
drag the animal ahead. The shell is
secreted by two sheets of tissue called
the mantle.
2 They feed by straining particles out of
the water by means of two sets of lace-
like gills (ctenidia). They are thus
animated filters and when present in
significant numbers may contribute to
the reduction of turbidity with resulting
solids accumulation.
3 Certain thick shelled forms such as the
Unionidae formerly commercially
harvested for use in making pearl
buttons, are exported to Japan for
production of nuclei for the cultured
pearl industry.
4 Certain small types (family Sphaeriidae)
such as Sphaerium the fingernail clam,
have been shown to tolerate considerable
organic pollution.
5 The Asian Clam, Corbicula. An exotic,
intermediate insize between the above
two families, is a serious pipe clogging
organism. Unlike the endemic families
it has planktonic larvae; hence,- it's
nuisance potential.
VII PHYLUM ANNELIDA - The segmented
Worm: Earthworms, Sludgeworms, and
Leeches (Sometimes regarded as separate
phyla)
A Class Oligochaeta, the earthworm-
sludgeworm group. Body clearly divided
into segments. Bristle like "setae" or
hairs present on most segments, are used
in locomotion; in some species may be
withdrawn beneath body surface.
1 Accurate identification requires simple
clearing procedures with the specimen.
Although these worms are herma-
phroditic (having both sexes in the same
individual), many of the smaller forms
commonly reproduce by a type of a
sexual budding which produces chains
of two or more individuals.
2 Aquatic earthworms and sludgeworms,
like their terrestrial counterparts, feed
on the soil or mud in which they live,
and contribute very significantly to its
stabilization. Having hemoglobin in
their blood, some of them can tolerate
very low oxygen tensions. Like the
snails mentioned above, they thus thrive
in polluted conditions in the absence of
predators (ex: Tub if ex. Limnodrilus.)
Smaller types (ex: Aelosoma,
Chaetogaster) may abound in activated
sludge.
B Class Hirudinea - leeches
1 These organisms are essentially
ectoparasites of vertebrates, though
they may also feed on smaller annelids,
snails, insect larvae, and organic ooze.
They are characterized by the possession
of an anterior and posterior sucker
9-3
-------
Macro Invertebrates
disc, and the absence of setae. Eyes
if present, are located on the (smaller)
anterior or oral sucker, although
sensory cells are widely scattered over
the general body surface.
They are not known to be the vectors of
any human disease, although when
present in numbers, their blood sucking
habits give them a considerable
nuisance value.
Their tolerance for sewage pollution is
considerable and they are hence often
present in great numbers in polluted
streams.
VIII PHYLUM ARTHROPODA - The Jointed
Animals
A Characterized in general by paired jointed
legs on a body nearly always segmented,
and a chitinous exoskeleton. Three of the
major groups have freshwater represent-
atives: The Crustacea, Arachnida, and
Insecta. The Insecta will be treated in a
separate section.
B Class Crustacea
1 Characterized by two pair of antennae,
respiration by means of blood gills
(or general body surface). The vast
majority of Crustacea are aquatic.
Crabs and lobsters are well known
marine examples, water fleas and
copepods well known freshwater
examples. No freshwater species
approach the giant marine species for
size where the king crab, for example,
may have a leg spread of several feet.
2 A few specialized terms used frequently
in connection with the Crustacea are
defined below.
Head:
The anterior part of the
body containing the mouth.
Usually consists of two
or more fused segments,
each represented by a
pair of specialized mouth-
parts .
Thorax: The major section of the
body behind the head.
Contains most of the body
organs and usually the
walking (or swimming)
legs.
Abdomen: The most posterior section
of the body. Contains the
anus and often gills. Is
seldom involved in loco-
motion except in swimming
forms.
Caphalothorax: The fused head and thorax.
Carapace: A fold of the body wall
or shell which usually
extends down over each
side of the thorax. May
cover the whole side or
only the bases of the legs.
Antenna: Sensory appendages or
"feelers". Typically two
in number in the
Crustacea.
Biramous: Two branched.
3 Subclass Branchipoda - phyllopods
These organisms have many pairs of
flattened appendages serving for both
locomotion and respiration.
The first three orders as listed below
tend to inhabit temporary pools, and so
are often good indicators of such water.
Life histories may often be completed
in 2-3 weeks. Occurrence is quite
sporadic. Many of them are tolerant
of highly saline or alkaline waters.
The Cladocera, the last order, is more
of an inhabitant of permanent bodies of
water. All are in general, plankton and
detritus feeders, often tolerant of high
organic content as long as aerobic
conditions are maintained.
a Order Anostraca - fairy shrimps.
Eleven to 17 pairs of thoracic
appendages, elongate, cylindrical
body without a carapace, eyes stalked.
9-4.
-------
Macro Invertebrates
Ex: Artemia (the brine shrimp).
General size range 15-30 mm.
extreme: 5-100 mm. Swim grace-
fully on their backs.
b Order Nbtostraca - tadpole shrimps.
Forty - 60 pairs of thoracic
appendages, body depressed and
partly covered by a dorsal shield
like carapace. Eyes sessile. Size
up to 100 mm.
c Order Conchostraca - clam shrimps.
Ten - 28 thoracic appendages. Body
laterally compressed and completely
enclosed in a bivalved carapace which
is often relatively thin and marked by
successive lines of growth. Generally
favored by warmer water. Size: 4-
16 mm.
d Order Cladocera - water fleas. Four -
6 pairs of thoracic appendages. Body
laterally compressed, all except the
the distinct head usually enclosed in
a bivalved carapace. Second antenna
is branched, and used for locomotion.
Single compound eye. Size: 0.2-3.0 mm
or more. Common genera include
Daphnia and Bosmina.
1) This is a large and widely dispersed
group, a common component of our
plankton in nearly all types of water.
2) Generally parthenogenetic, until
unfavorable conditions stimulate
the production of males. Sexual
eggs result which can withstand
freezing and drying. '
3) Species in general are very widely
distributed.
Subclass Ostracoda - seed shrimps.
Two or three pairs of thoracic appendages.
Body laterally compressed, and entirely
enclosed in a bivalve carapace. Fresh-
water and marine. Size: 0.35-21 mm.
No growth lines on valves (cf.
Conchostraca). Over 1700 species
known, about 1/3 freshwater.
"Microscopic clams with legs".
a Widely distributed, clean to polluted
water. Generally free living except
for a few rare commensals.
b Pollution significance is not known.
5 Subclass Copepoda - copepods.
Five - 6 pairs of thoracic appendages,
the 1st 4 biramous. Body cylindrical,
divided into two sections (Cephalothorax
or metasome, and abdomen or urosome).
Some parasitic forms are greatly
modified. Locomotion by means of
2nd antenna, which is unbranched
(cf: Cladocera). Many virtually
transparent. Up to 3 mm.
a Distribution world wide, freshwater
and marine. One of most abundant
of animal plankton.
b Development includes a complex
series of growth stages. Eggs
carried over from year to year
in mud. Resist drying and freezing.
6 Subclass Branchiura - fish lice.
With suction cups on head appendages,
body strongly depressed, ectoparasitic
on fish. Sometimes considered to be an
order of the copepoda. Of primary
importance as fish parasites.
7 Subclass Malacostraca - (no collective
common name). Body usually consisting
of 20 segments (approximately 5 in head,
8 in thorax, 7 in abdomen) and 19 pairs
of appendages exclusive of eyes.
Approximately 30, 000 species known
nearly 800 in N. America. Of the
12 orders recognized, only 4 have
freshwater representatives.
a Order Mysidacea - oppossum shrimps.
Essentially a marine group, but
three species inhabit our fresh
waters. Superficially resemble
marine shrimps of commerce.
Carapace thin and does not com-
pletely cover thorax. Stalked
compound eyes extremely large.
Nektonic in nature, with thoracic
appendages adapted for swimming.
9-5
-------
Macro Invertebrates
1) Mysis relicta inhabits deep cold
oligotropic lakes in northern
states east of Great Plains. Up
to 30 mm. Circumboreal.
2) Acanthomysis awatchensis occurs
in lakes, rivers, and brackish
estuaries of Pacific N.W.
3) Taphromysis louisianae
Gulf coast region, also brackish
water. Up to 8 mm.
b .Order Isopoda - aquatic sow bugs or
pill bugs. Some fifty freshwater
species represent approximately 5%
of all known species, many of which
are terrestrial as well as marine.
Size: 5-20 mm.
1) Ovoid, flattened dorsoventrally.
Most of the thoracic and abdominal
segments are unfused, giving the
animals a many-jointed appearance.
Lateral extensions of each segment
and the absence of any large pro-
truding structures combine to give
an overall impression of an army
tank in life.
2) Generally inhabit springs, brooks
and subterranean waters. In the
north central states they are often
abundant in small polluted streams
that go dry in summer, of which
they are frequently almost the only
inhabitants.
c Order Amphipoda - scuds or
sideswimmers. Chiefly a marine
group with about 50 American fresh-
water species. Size: 5-20 mm.
1) Body is laterally compressed, few
fused segments as in isopods.
Eyes generally well developed
except in subterranean species.
2) Occur in a wide variety of
relatively unpolluted waters where
ample oxygen is present. Generally
nocturnal. Soft waters generally
favored, but Gammarus limnaeus
is common in hard waters and
Hyalella azteca is sometimes
found in alkaline and brackish
waters.
3) Subterranean species are common
in cavernous areas, and hence
frequently appear in well waters.
4) Scuds serve as intermediate hosts
for a variety of parasites of
waterfowl, amphibians, and fishes,
but not so far as known for man.
d Order Decapoda - freshwater
shrimps, crayfish; also marine
lobsters, and crabs.
Only about 160 species of this huge,
essentially marine group, are found
in the fresh waters of N. America,
of which about 130 are crayfishes.
True freshwater crabs occur in
Mexico and in the West Indies and
one species has been reported in
Florida. Other marine crabs
occasionally invade fresh waters
for extended periods and some have
become essentially terrestrial.
Decapods are in general from the
Rocky Mountain region.
1) Decapod shrimps (prawns) can be
distinguished by the laterally
compressed rostrum. Commercial
freshwater prawn culture techniques
have been developed. Size 3-23 cm.
2) The crayfishes (crawdads, crabs)
are the predominant group of
freshwater decapods. Their
shell is heavier and the pincers
usually strongly developed.
There are many burrowing forms
and many species have rather
specialized habitat preferences.
Unfortunately, however, their
pollution significance has not
been worked out. In general it
can be said that they can tolerate
a considerable amount of pollution.
Size, (exclusive of antennae):
15-130 mm.
9-6
-------
Macro Invertebrates
Class Arachnida - spiders, scorpions,
ticks, and mites. The water mites
(Parasitegona) have become extensively
adapted to fresh waters, and these are
almost exclusively restricted to fresh-
water, there being very few marine and
no terrestrial forms. They are readily
recognized by their bright colors,
globular to ovoid shape, and clambering
and swimming habits. Other types of
Acari or mites found in marine and fresh-
water are in the Halacaridae and Oribatei.
These crawling types are sometimes
found in large numbers in activated sludge.
Size 0.4 - 3.0 mm.
1 Superficially resemble minute spiders,
but have no division into cephalothorax
and abdomen. All evident segmentation
has been lost. Four pairs of legs are
present in the adult stage.
2 Mites are carnivorous or parasitic,
feeding on aquatic invertebrates. Some
are commensal on mussels, and host
specific.
REFERENCES
1 Eddy, S. and Hodson, A. C. Taxonomic
Keys to the Common Animals of the
North Central States. Burgess
Publishing Company, Minneapolis.
162pp. 3rd Edition. 1961.
2 Palmer, E. Lawrence. Fieldbook of
Natural History. Whittlesey House.
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
New York. 1949.
3 Pennak, R.W. Freshwater Invertebrates
of the United States. The Ronald Press
Company. New York. 1953.
4 Pratt, H.W. A Manual of the Common
Invertebrate Animals Exclusive of
Insects. The Blakiston Company.
Philadelphia. 1951.
5 Pimentel, Richard A. Invertebrate
Identification Manual. Reinhold.
151 pp. 1967.
6 Stewart, R. Keith, Ingram, W.M. and
Mackenthun, K.M. Water Pollution
Control. Waste Treatment and Water '
Treatment: Selected Biological
References on Fresh and Marine Waters.
FWPCA. WP-23. pp. 126. 1966.
7 Ward, H.B. and Whipple, G. C.
W. T. Edmondson, ed. Freshwater
Biology. John Wiley & Sons. New York.
1959.
This outline was prepared by H. W. Jackson,
Chief Biologist, National Training Center,
WPO, EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268 and
revised by R.M. Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist,
National Training Center.
9-7
-------
Macro Invertebrates
3A
Platworms
Phylum PLflTYHELMlNTHES
Planar!a. a free living
flatworm, class
Turbellarla
Man eats under-
ocoked flsn
Adult in
human liver
Piece of fish
enoysted
oeroarla
— egg oontain-
ing ffliraoldiuffl
young redia
in sporooyst'
Life history of human liver fluke,
Clonorohls sinensis. Class Treme boda
young oeroarlae in redla
Aspects in the life oyole of the human tapeworm
Dlphvllobothrium latum. olass Cestoda. A, adult as in human intes-
tine; B.prooerooid larva in oopepod; C, plerooerooid larva in
flesh of pickerel (X-ray view).
H.W.Jaokson
9-9
-------
Macro Invertebrates
MINOR PHYLA
Phylum Coelenterata
Hydra, with bud;
extended, and contracted
Medusa of
Craapedacuflta
C ordylophora caspia colony
Phylum Bryozoa
Massive colony on
stick
Creeping colony
on rock
Single zooid, young statoblasts in tube
9-10
-------
Macro Invertebrates
FRESH WATER ANNELID WORMS
Phylum Annelida
anus
• mouth
Clase Oligochaeta, earthworms
Ex; Tut) if ex , the eludgeworm
(After Liebman)
mouth
posterior sucker disc
Class Hirudinea, leeches
(After Hegner)
anterior end
, H.W.Jackson
Class Polychaeta , polychaet worms
Ex: Manayunkia, a minute, rare, tube
• • .- building worm-.
PLATE XII c ' ', , (Af ter .Leidy)
9-11
-------
Macro Invertebrates
SOME MOLLUSCAN TYPES
Claac: Cephalopoda*
Squids, octopus,
cuttlaflth.
marine.
The giant squid «hown
was captured in the
Atlantic in the oarI/
ninteenth century.
(After Hegner)
Lima*.
a slug
Lyanaea
Campeloma
an air breathing mail a water breathing
•nail.
ClaiBs QaBtffopodai •nails and alugB. (After Buchsbana)
Class: Pelecypodaj clams, mussels, oysters.
Locomotion of a freshwater clam, showing how foot is extended, the tip
expanded, and the animal pulled along to it« own anchor. (After Bucho-
baum) PLATE XII d H.W.Jack8on
9-12
-------
Macro Invertebrates
3/4
Class CRUSTACEA
Crayfish, or orawdad;
Cambarua. Order Oeoapoda
10-20 em
Water Plea;
Daphnia
Fairy Shrimp;
Eubranohipus. Order
Phyllopoda
20-25 mm
Bond; Hvalella
Order Jbnphipoda
10-15 mm
Sow Bugj AaelluB.
Order^sopoda
10-20 mm
Order
Cladooera
Fish Louse, Argulus;
a parasitic Copepod
H.W.Jaokson
Copepod; Cyclops. ttrder Copepoda
2-5 mm
PLATE X
9-13
-------
FISHES
I INTRODUCTION: What is a fish?
A A fish is a gill-breathing aquatic vertebrate
with fins (exceptions noted).
B Other Aquatic Vertebrates
1 Amphibia - frogs, toads, salamanders
a Modern amphibia do not have scales.
b Tadpole stages easily recognized.
c Pollutional significance not studied
to date. Frogs often observed in
polluted waters but not aquatic
salamanders.
2 Reptilia - snakes and turtles
a Relatively independent of water
quality as long as it is not irritating.
b Carnivorous types would be starved
out of polluted areas for lack of food.
3 Mammalia - muskrats, beavers
a Generally inhabit wilderness areas
where heavy pollution is not a
problem.
II STRUCTURE AND PHYSIOLOGY
o
A Fins
1 A typical fish has two sets of paired
fins, the pectoral and pelvic, compar-
able (homologous) to our arms and legs
respectively. Certain ancient fish
could walk on their lobe-like fins, and
some specialized modern forms like-
wise.
Unpaired dorsal, anal, and caudal or
tail fins, complete the fin structures.
Any or all of these may be missing,
and fleshy extra fins such as the
"adipose" fins of trout and salmon,
catfishes, etc., may appear. Extra
paired fins too are known. The dorsal
fin is often divided into two or more
sections known as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.,
dorsal fins.
Fins may be supported by soft-rays or
stiff spines or both.
B The body of a typical fish is covered with
scales.
1 Four types of scales are recognized.
a The most primitive are bony plates
bearing tooth-like projections as
found in sharks and rays.
b Smooth bony plates such as those
of the gar and dogfish are some -
what higher in specialization.
c Thin smooth roundish "cycloid"
scales are characteristic of the
more primitive of the modern
"bony" fishes like herring or trout.
d Roundish scales with tiny spines
or cteni are characteristic of the
highest fishes like the black basses.
These are called ctenoid scales.
Cycloid and ctenoid scales are non-
living material like hair or fingernails,
covered with a thin layer of living
tissue cells. This tissue is easily
injured as by handling a fish with dry
hands.
BI.AQ.18c. 10.68
10-1
-------
Fishes
C Respiration of a typical fish is by means
of blood gills (Cf: tracheal gills of insects).
1 Gills, like lungs, are a device for
bringing the blood into close proximity
to the environment.
2 Certain ancient fishes and their modern
descendents, the lungfishes, breathed
air. Some of the modern bonyfishes
like certain catfishes also have a
limited air breathing capacity.
D The maintenance of a constant internal
osmotic pressure of their body fluids in
competition with their environment is a
problem which fishes have that terrestrial
animals with their waterproof skins do not
have.
1 The slime covering body and gills is
an important part of the regulatory
mechanism.
2 Marine fishes live in an environment
that tends to dehydrate the body. Con-
sequently water appears to be swallowed
from time to time in order to replace
that lost through the gills and general
body surface. This may make marine
fishes more susceptible to some toxic
substances which would then be taken
internally instead of simply contacting
the skin externally.
3 Freshwater fishes live in an environ-
ment with an osmotic pressure far
lower than that of body fluids. Toxic
substances would then be less likely
to be taken internally except with food.
Ill REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Although almost infinite variety exists,
most fishes lay their eggs externally in
the water, at which time the male showers
them with milt. Such species are said to
be oviparous. In some species such as
the familiar guppy however, fertilization
is .internal and the eggs develop and hatch
in the mother's body. No nourishment
is known to be transmitted from mother
to developing young. Such species are
said to be ovoviviparious. The young
are thus "born alive. "
1 Most fish eggs hatch before all the
food material stored in the egg as
yolk is used up. Embryonic develop-
ment is still going on and they are
truly in a larval or pre-adult condition.
During their first hours or days of
free life, they are thus still indepen-
dent of their environment for food.
This early stage is known as yolk sac
fry or simply sac fry.
2 The young continue to be called fry,
or advanced fry until they approach an
inch in length, when they are referred
to as fingerlings.
3 Fry which differ greatly from the form
of the adult may be referred to as larvae.
Some fish lay their eggs in the same
general location in which they live as
adults. Others travel to some distant
place, such as from lakes or rivers up
into small streams, from deep water to
shoal, from the ocean to fresh water,
from fresh water to the ocean, etc. These
are called breeding migrations.
1 Fish that normally live in freshwater
and travel to the ocean to reproduce
are called catadromous. The fresh-
water eel is the best known example.
2 Those that live in the sea and lay their
eggs in freshwater are called anadro-
mous. Striped bass, shad and certain
other herrings, and the salmons are
well known examples. Occasionally,
a group of anadromous fish will get
lost in the inland waters and not be
able to find its way back to the sea.
These are called landlocked varieties
and are usually somewhat smaller than
their non-Ian-locked relatives.
3 Pollution or other factors which either
block a breeding migration or destroy
a spawning bed may completely destroy
10-2
-------
Fishes
a species, even though the adults in
their natural habitat are untouched.
IV CLASSIFICATION OF FISHES
Fishes may be classified or grouped in many
different ways.
Food, Feeding Habits and Ecological
Interrelationships
Fish, like many other animal groups, in-
clude carnivores, herbivores, and
detritus feeders or scavengers.
1 Scavengers may specialize on bottom
feeding like certain suckers, carps,
and catfishes. Others may take any
organic matter they can find, where-
ever they can find it. Scavengers are
often provided with barbels or feeders
which help in locating food, especially
in turbid water.
2 Herbivores may feed on the larger,
vascular plants as some carps or
they may specialize on the microscopic
phytoplankton, in which case they are
called plankton feeders. Plankton
feeders usually have weak mouths and
fine gill rakers for straining the plank-
ton out of the water.
3 The carnivorous or predatory species
feed essentially on living animals.
They may specialize on invertebrates
or other fish, in which case they may
be called piscivorous.
a Piscivorous fish usually depend
essentially on eyesight for locating
their food, and hence turbid water
is a handicap.
b The carnivorous fish in general
include most of the game fish.
c Small species of fish which are not
used directly by man but are used
extensively as food by piscivorous
species are often referred to as
forage fish.
B Classification with reference to their
desirability or to mode of use by man
has been widely used. An example of
such a system is as follows:
1 Commercial - those that occur in
sufficient quantities to support a
fishery.
Food fishes:
cod
white-fish, salmon,
Product fishes:
herrings
sharks, blue back
Game or sport - those captured
essentially for sport. Many species
fall into both this and the commercial
categories such as the trouts, black-
basses, striped bass, etc.
a Gamefish are sometimes considered
to be those which are of interest to
man only for the catching, as the
tarpon.
b Fish which are taken, even though
in sport, but which are also eaten
are then called panfish. Sometimes
panfish refers only to the smaller
of the edible gamefish.
Rough fishes are those such as the
gars, and the bowfins, which are of
little or no use to man. Some, such
as the carp, are classed in different
groups in different regions according
to local custom.
A classification developed with reference
to standard methods of reporting fish
population data for reservoirs is as
follows: (Surber '59):
Group 1. Predatory Game Fish - bass,
crappies, trout, etc.
Group 2. Non-predatory Game Fish -
sunfish, rock bass, perch, etc.
10-3
-------
Fishes
Group 3. Non-predatory Food Fish - carp,
drum, buffalo, suckers, bullheads,
etc.
Group 4. Predatory Food Fish - catfish,
gar, bowfin, etc.
Group 5. Forage Fish (Non-predatory) -
gizzard shad, threadfin shad,
Gambusia, minnows, etc.
D The scientific classification system for
fishes lists many thousands of species.
Three great groups of living fishes occur
in this country: the Agnatha or jawless
fishes, the Chbndrichthyes or cartilaginous
fishes and the Osteichthyes or (modern)
boney fishes. Some additional groups
occur in other parts of the world.
1 The jawless fishes are represented in
fresh water by the lampreys, which
have in recent years invaded the Great
Lakes from the sea and wrecked havoc
on the native species.
2 The cartilaginous fishes are the sharks,
skates, and rays, primarily a marine
group.
3 The vast majority of fishes with which
most of us are familiar belong to the
Osteichthyes or bony fishes, a few
typical families are listed below:
a The family Acipenseridae or
sturgeons are a primitive group,
famed for their roe which is sold
as caviar. More or less covered
with large, bony plates. Formerly
extremely abundant and large in size.
b Family Lepisosteidae - the gars.
These Voracious fish are covered
with hard, enamel-like, rhomboid
scales. Some species may grow
to great size. Widely regarded as
"trash" fish.
c The family Salmonidae includes the
trouts, salmons, whitings, and
graylings. Scales are cycloid and
always small, an extra or adipose
fin on the back, eggs are very large,
favored by cold water. In the Pacific
Salmon, but one set of reproductive
cells is formed in the life of the
individual, which therefore dies
after spawning once.
d The family Catostomidae is the
suckers. The head is naked of
scales, jaws toothless, mouth
usually protractile, lips generally
thick and fleshy. Feed on plants
and small animals.
e The family Cyprinidae is the carp-
dace-minnow group. Here too the
head is naked, and the body usually
scaled. Ventral fins usually well
back. Teeth are lacking in the jaws.
Certain bones in the back of the
throat known as the pharyngeals are
strongly developed however, and
bear from 1 to 3 series of teeth
which are often of importance in
identification. Upwards of 1800
species, abundant where present
at all, both in numbers and variety.
Generally small in size although
Leucosomus corporalis the chub,
roach, or fallfish may reach a
length of 18 inches in the east, and
related species 5 to 6 feet on the
west coast. Because of the many
similar species, this is one of the
most difficult groups in zoology
to identify to species.
Two genera, Cyprinus which includes
the common carp, and Carassius
including the goldfish have been
introduced and become widely
established. Both are native to
China. Other introduced Cyprinids
have so far not become widely
established.
f Family Ictaluridae, the freshwater
catfishes. Body more or less
elongate, naked. Eight barbels or
feelers in head region. Dorsal fin
short, an adipose fin behind. First
ray of dorsal and pectorals developed
as stout spines. Many excellent food
fish. Very tenacious of life.
10-4
-------
Fishes
Family Centrarchidae - sunfishes
and freshwater basses. Scales •
ctenoid. Dorsal fin continuous
but may be in two sections, the
anterior spined, the posterior rayed.
Generally carnivorous. Typical of
eastern North America but have
been widely introduced in other
areas. Nest builders.
Additional well known families of bony
fishes are listed below:
Polyodontidae
Amiidae
Gasterosteidae
Cyprinodontidae
Serranidae
Ictaluridae
Percidae
Cottidae
Atherinidae
Clupeidae
Osmeridae
Salmonidae
Anguiledae
Poeciliidae
Gadidae
Esocidae
Sciaenidae
- paddlefishes
- bowfins
- stickelbacks
- killifishes
- sea basses
- freshwater
catfishes
- perches and darters
- sculpins
- silversides
- herrings
- smelts
- whitefishes, trouts,
etc.
- eel
- guppies, mosquito -
fishes
- cods, hakes,burbots
- pikes and pickerels
- drums
3 Eddy, Samuel. How to Know the Fresh-
water Fishes. Wm. C. Brown Co.
Dubuque, Iowa. 1957.
4 Hubbs, C.L., and Lagler, K.F. Fishes
of the Great Lakes Region, Bull.
Cranbrook Inst. Sci. Bloomfield Hills,
Michigan. 1949.
5 Lagler, K.F. Freshwater Fishery
Biology. Wm. C. Brown Co. Dubuque,
Iowa. 1952.
6 Surber, E.S. Suggested Standard Methods
of Reporting Fish Population Data for
Reservoirs. Proc. 13th Ann. Conf.
S. E. Assoc. Game & Fish Comm.
pp. 313-325. Baltimore, Md.
October 25-27, 1959.
7 Trautman, M. B. The Fishes of Ohio.
Ohio State Univ. Press. (An out-
standing example of a state study.)
Columbus, Ohio. 1957.
REFERENCES
1 American Fisheries Society. A List of
Common and Scientific Names of Fishes
. From the United States and Canada.
Special Publication No. 2. Am. Fish
Soc. Dr. E.A. Seaman, Sec.-Treas.
Box 483, McLean, Va. (Price $1.00
paper, $2.00 cloth.) 1960.
2 Bailey, Reeve M. A Revised List of the
Fishes of Iowa with Keys for Identifica-
tion. IN: Iowa Fish and Fishing. State
of Iowa. Super, of Printing. (Excel-
lent color pictures.) 1956.
This outline was prepared by H.W. Jackson,
Chief Biologist, National Training Center,
Water Programs Operations. EPA, Cincinnati,
OH 45268.
10-5
-------
Fishes
SOME PRIMITIVE FISHES
Class Agnatha, jawless fishes (lampreys and hagfishes) - Family
PETROMYZONTIDAE, the lampreys. Lampetra aepyptera, the
Brook Lamprey A: adult, B: larva (enlarged)
Class Chondrichthyes - cartilagenous fishes (sharks, skates, rays)
Family DASYATIDAE - stingrays. Dasyatis centroura, the Roughtail Stingray
HBa/-Tv>~> •
s^^^^^y^
"*~"'*~:j^f">
1^
Class Osteichthyes - bony fishes - Family ACIPENSER1DAE, sturgeon.
Acipenser fulvescens, the Lake Sturgeon
Class Osteichthyes - bony fishes - Family POLYODONTIDAE, the
paddlefishes. Polyodon spathula, the Paddlefish. A:side view B:top view
Class Osteichthyes - bony fishes - Family LEPISOSTEIDAE - gars
Lepisosteus osseus, the Longnose Gar
Class Osteichthyes - bony fishes - Family AMIIDAE, bowfins
Aniia calva, the Bowfin
Reproduced with permission; Trautman, 1957.
BI.AQ.pl. 91. 6. 60
-------
Family SALMONIDAE
CO
: Salmo trutta - brown trout
Salmo gairdneri - rainbow (or steelhead) trout
Salvelinus namaychush - the lake trout
Coregonus clupeaformis - lake whitefish
Salvelinus fontinalis - brook trout Oncorhynchus tshawytscha - the chinook salmon
Reproduced with permission; Trautman, 1947 (except Chinook salmon
after Jordan '05).
BI.AQ. pi. 9f. 6.60
-------
Fishes
Family CATOSTOMIDAE - the suckers
Ictiobus cyprinellus - bigmouth buffalofish
Cat os torn us catostomus - eastern longnose sucker
Hypentelium nigricans - hog sucker
Moxostoma aureolum - northern short he ad redhorse
Reproduced with permission; Trautman, 1957.
BI.AQ.pl.9g.6.60
-------
jKishes
Family CYPRINIDAE - the minnows, carps, and goldfishes
Pimephales promelas - fathead minnow
Notemigonus crysoleucas - golden shiner
Chrosomus erythrogaster - southern redbelly dace
Semotilus atromaculatus - creek chub
Reproduced with permission; Hart, Doudoroff, and Greenbank, 1945.
BI.AQ. pi. 9h. 6.60
-------
Fishes
Family ICTALURIDAE - the freshwater catfishes
Ictalurus nebulosus - brown bullhead
Noturus insignis - margined madtom
Reproduced with permission; Hart, Doudoroff, and Greenbank, 1945.
BI.AQ.pl.9i. 6.60
-------
Fishes
Family CENTRARCHIDAE - the sunfishes
Lepomis macrochirus - bluegill
Micropterus salmoides - largemouth bass
Pomoxis nigromaculatus - black crappie
Reproduced with permission; Hart, Doudoroff, and.Greenbank. 1945.
BI.AQ.pl. 9k. 6.60
-------
Fishes
TYPES OF BONY FISHES I
JLLLLA
Family GASTEROSTEIDAE, the
Sticklebacks. Eucalia inconstans,
the brook stickleback
Family CYPRINODONTIDAE, the
Killifishes. Fundulus notatus, the
blackstripe topminnow
Family SERRANIDAE, the sea basses.
Roccus americanus, the white perch
Family CATOSTOMIDAE, the
suckers. Catostomus commersonii,
the white sucker
Family PERCIDAE - the perches.
Perca havescens, the yellow perch
Family PERCIDAE, the perches.
Etheostoma nigrum, the johnny
darter
Family COTTIDAE, the sculpins.
Cottus bairdii, the mottled sculpin
Family ATHERINIDAE, the silversides.
Labidesthes sicculus, the brook silverside.
Reproduced with permission; Hart, Doudoroff and Greenbank, 1945.
BI.AQ.pl. 9m. 6. 60
-------
TYPES OF BONY FISHES
en
0>
10
male
vm%?.
y^silpiiyifp
^^g
X. ^~3jt-
w
&===s=L
Family CLUPEIDAE - herrings
Dorosoma cepedianum - the eastern gizzard shad
female
Family POECILIIDAE - livebea^ers
Gambusia affinis - the mosquitofish
Family ANGUILLEDAE - freshwater eels
Anguilla rostrata - the American eel
Family GADDIDAE - codfishes, hakes, haddock, burbot
Lota lota - the eastern burbot
Family ESOCIDAE -. pikes
Esox lucius - the northern pike
Reproduced with permission; Trautman, 1957.
BI.AQ.pl. 9m. 6.60
.35. '•/,-^V:!-^Jr:-':^>::i'':^.:"-;'-inf\<^
Family SCIAENIDAE - drums
Aplodinotus grunniens - the freshwater drum
-------
Fishes
ADIPOSE FINS - in catfishes
/_ Barbels
The Adipose Fin does not extend to the Caudal Fin
(Ictalurus nebulosus)
The .Adipose Fin extends to the Caudal Fin
(Noturus insignis)
Reproduced with permission; Hart, Doudoroff and Greenbank, 1945.
BI.AQ.pl.9e.6.60
-------
STANDARD LEhlGTH
«—LENGTH or HEAD
SKlOUT
DORSAL FIN
ORIGIN OFDOR5AL
LATERALL1NE
PECTORAL FIM
n AXILLARY
ILLARY
LOWER JAW
OPERCLE
SUBOPEffCLE.
INTEROPERCLE
PREOPERCLE
ANAL F!M
CAUDAL
A SOFT-RAYED nsH. $erlQT/LUS ATXQrlACULATUS
Hart, Doudoroff, and
Greenbank, 1945
BI.AQ.pl.9a.6.60
-------
GlLL MEMBRANES
GIL.L. ric
tsrHrtus.
SEPARATE.
PHARYNGEALTEETH
LOWER PHARYNGEAL BONE.
OF" PHARYNGtAL T££.7~H tM THE
ISTHMUS -
SILL
MEMBRANES
PHARYNCCALTEETH
LowfR
GlLL
Hart, Doudoroff, and
Greenbank, 1945
This outline was prepared by H.W.Jackson.
5ERARATE AND
ISTHMUS-
TO
COMB-LIKE: TZ-ETHI^THC.
CATOSTOMIOAE. si.AQ.pi.9c. 6. GO
-------
FIN AND SCALE STRUCTURES
SCALE.
ANTERIOR
PART
POSTERIOR-
PAI?T
ANTERIOR
PART
POSTERIOR'
PAf?T
SPlHOUS DORSAL
tn
(T)
co
f?AYED DORSAL
Sorr PAY
CYCLOID SCALE:
A OOR5AL FIH COMPOSED OF SPINOU5 AHO SOFT&AYS
Reproduced with permission; Hart, Doudoroff, and Greenbank, 1945.
BI.AQ. pi. 9d.6.60
-------
FUNGI AND THE "SEWAGE FUNGUS" COMMUNITY
I INTRODUCTION
A Description
Fungi are heterotrophic achylorophyllous
plant-like organisms which possess true
nuclei with nuclear membranes and nu-
cleoli. Dependent upon the species and
in some instances the environmental
conditions, the body of the fungus, the
thallus, varies from a microscopic
single cell to an extensive plasmodium
or mycelium. Numerous forms produce
macroscopic fruiting bodies.
B Life Cycle
The life cycles of fungi vary from simple
to complex and may include sexual and
asexual stages with varying spore types
as the reproductive units.
C Classification
Traditionally, true fungi are classified
within the Division Eumycotina of the
Phylum Mycota of the plant kingdom.
Some authorities consider the fungi an
essentially monophyletic group distinct
from the classical plant and animal
kingdoms.
Ill ECOLOGY
A Distribution
Fungi are ubiquitous in nature and mem-
bers of all classes may occur in large
numbers in aquatic habitats. Sparrow
(1968) has briefly reviewed the ecology
of fungi in freshwaters with particular
emphasis on the zoosporic phycomycetes.
The occurrence and ecology of fungi in
marine and estuarine waters has been
examined recently by a number of in-
vestigators (Johnson and Sparrow,- 1961;
Johnson, 1968; Myers, 1968; van Uden
and Fell, 1968).
B Relation to Pollution
Wm. Bridge Cooke, in a series of in-
vestigations (Cooke, 1965), has estab-
lished that fungi other than phycomycetes
occur in high numbers in sewage and
polluted waters. His reports on organic
pollution of streams (Cooke, 1961; 1967)
show that the variety of the Deuteromy-
cete flora is decreased at the immediate
sites of pollution, but dramatically in-
creased downstream from these regions.
II ACTIVITY
In general, fungi possess broad enzymatic
capacities. Various species are able to
actively degrade such compounds as
complex polysaccharides (e.g., cellulose,
chitin, and glycogen), proteins (casein,
albumin, keratin), hydrocarbons (kerosene)
and pesticides. . Most species possess an
oxidative or microaerophilic metabolism,
but anaerobic catabolism is not uncommon.
A few species show anaerobic metabolism
and growth.
Yeasts, in particular, have been found
in large numbers in organically enriched
waters (Cooke. et al., 1960; Cooke and
Matsuura, 1963; Cooke. 1965b; Ahearn.
et al.. 1968). Certain yeasts are of
special interest due to their potential
use as "indicator" organisms and their
ability to degrade or utilize proteins,
various hydrocarbons, straight and
branch chained alkyl-benzene sulfonates,
fats, metaphosphates,. and wood sugars.
BI.FU.6a.5.71
11-1
-------
Fungi
C "Sewage Fungus" Community (Plate I)
A few microorganisms have long been
termed "sewage fungi. " The most
common microorganisms included in
this group are the iron bacterium
Sphaerotilus natans and the phycomy-
cete Leptomitus lacteus.
1 Sphaerotilus natans is not a fungus;
rather it is a sheath bacterium of
the order chlamydobacteriales.
This polymorphic bacterium occurs
commonly in organically enriched
streams where it may produce
extensive slimes.
a Morphology
Characteristically, S. natans
forms chains of rod shaped
cells (1. 1 - 2. On x 2.5- l?n)
within a clear sheath or tri-
chome composed ofaprotein-
polysaccharidae-lipid complex.
The rod cells are frequently
motile upon release from the
. sheath; the flagella are lopho-
trichous. Occasionally two
rows of cells may be present
in a single sheath. Single tri-
chomes may be several mm
in length and bent at various
angles. Empty sheaths, ap-
pearing like thin cellophane
- straws, may be present.
b Attached growths
The trichomes are cemented
at 'one end to solid substrata
such as stone or metal, and
their cross attachment and
bending gives a superficial
similarity to true fungal hyphae.
The ability to attach firmly to
solid substrates gives S. natans
a selective advantage in the
population of flowing streams.
For more thorough reviews of
S.natans see Prigsheim( 1949)
and Stokes (1954).
Leptomitus lacteus also produces
extensive slimes and fouling floes
in fresh waters. This species forms
thalli typified by regular constrictions.
a Morphology
Cellulin plugs may be present
near the constrictions and there
may be numerous granules in
the cytoplasm. The basal cell
of the thallus may possess
rhizoids.
b Reproduction
The segments delimited by the
partial constrictions are con-
verted basipetally to sporangia.
The zoospores are diplanetic
(i. e., dimorphic) and each
possesses one whiplash and one
tinsel flagellum. No sexual
stage has been demonstrated
for this species.
c Distribution
For further information on the
distribution and systematics
of_E. lacteus see Sparrow (1960),
Yerkes (1966) and Emerson and
Weston (1967). Both S. natans
and Ij. lacteus appear to thrive
in organically enriched cold
waters (5°-22°C) andbothseem
incapable of extensive growth at
temperatures of about 30°C.
d Gross morphology
Their metabolism is oxidative
and growth of both species may
appear as reddish brown floes
or stringy slimes of 30 cm or
more in length. •
e Nutritive requirements
Sphaerotilus natans is able to
utilize a wide variety of organic
compounds, whereas L. lacteus
does not assimilate simple
11-2
-------
Fungi
PLATE I
"SEWAGE FUNGUS" COMMUNITY OR "SLIME GROWTHS"
(Attached "filamentous" and slime growths)
Zoogloea
Sphaerotilus natans
Beggiatoa alba
BACTERIA
Fusarium aqueductum
Leptomitus lacteus
Geotrichum .candidum
FUNGI
Epistylis 8
/£>&
10
Opercularia
PROTOZOA
11-3
-------
Fungi
PLATE II
REPRESENTATIVE FUNGI
Figure •*•
Fusarium aquaeductuum ..
(Radlmacher and
Rabenhorst) Saccardo
Microconidia (A) produced
from phialides as in Cephalo-
sporium, remaining in slime
balls. Macroconidia (B), with
one to several cross walls,
produced bom collared phial-
ides. Drawn from culture.
Figure 3
Geotrichum candidum
Link ex Persoon
Mycelium with short cells
and arthrospores. Young hy-
pha (A) ; and mature arthro-
spores (B). Drawn from cul-
ture.
Figure
Achlya americana Humphrey
Ooogonium with three oo-
spores (A); young zoospor-
angium with delimited zoo-
spores (B); and zoosporangia
(C) with released zoospores
that remain encysted in clus-
ters at the mouth of the dis-
charge tube. Drawn from cul-
ture.
Figure 2.
Leptomitiu lactcus (Roth)
Agardh
Cells of the hyphae show-
ing constrictions with cellulin
plugs. In one cell large zoo-
spores have been delimited.
Redrawn from Coker, 1923.
Figure ' *T~
Zoophagus insidians
Sommerstorff
Mycelium with hyphal pegs
(A) on which rotifers will
become impaled; gemmae (B)
produced as conidia on short
hyphal branches; and rotifer
impaled on hyphal peg (C)
from which hyphae have
grown into the rotifer whose
shell will be discarded after
the contents are consumed.
Drawn from culture.
Vlnnnnnt
l>*
FIGURE / Ilaplosporidivm costale. A—mature spore;
B—early plnsmodiuih..
Figures 1 through 5 from Cooke; Figures 6 and 7 from Galtsoff.
11-4
-------
Fungi
sugars and grows most luxuriantly in
the presence of organic nitrogenous
wastes.
3 Ecological roles
Although the "sewage fungi" on
occasion attain visually noticeable
concentrations, the less obvious
populations of deuteromycetes may
be more important in the ecology of
the aquatic habitat. Investigations of
the past decade indicate that numerous
fungi are of primary importance in the
mineralization of organic wastes; the
overall significance and exact roles of
fungi in this process are yet to be
established.
D Predacious Fungi
1 Zoophagus insidians
(Plate II, Figure 4) has been observed
to impair functioning of laboratory
activated sludge units (see Cooke and
Ludzack).
2 Arthrobotrys is usually found along
with Zoophagus in laboratory activated
sludge units. This fungus is predacious
upon nematodes. Loops rather than
"pegs" are used in snaring nematodes.
IV CLASSIFICATION
In recent classification schemes, classes
of fungi are distinguished primarily on the
basis of the morphology of the sexual and
zoosporic stages. In practical schematics,
however, numerous fungi do not demonstrate
these stages. Classification must therefore
be based on the sum total of the morphological
and/or physiological characteristics. The
extensive review by Cooke (1963) on methods
of isolation and classification of fungi from
sewage and polluted waters precludes the
need herein of extensive' keys and species
illustrations. A brief synopsis key of the
fungi adapted in part from Alexopholous
(1962) is presented on the following pages.
This outline was prepared by Dr. Donald G.
Ahearn, Professor of Biology, Georgia State
College, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
PLATE II (Figure 4)
11-5
-------
Fungi
KEY TO THE MAJOR TAXA OF FUNGI
1 Definite cell walls lacking, somatic phase a free living Plasmodium
Sub-phylum Myxomycotina . . (true slime molds). .Class Myxomycetes
1' Cell walls usually well defined, somatic phase not a free-living Plasmodium
(true fungi) Sub-phylum Eumycotina 2
2 Hyphal filaments usually coenoctytic, rarely septate, sex cells when present forming
oospores or zygospores, aquatic species propagating asexually by zoospores, terrestrial
species by zoospores, sporangiospores conidia or conidia-like sporangia .'.'Phycomycetes". .. 3
The phycomycetes are generally considered to include the most primitive of the true
fungi. As a whole, they encompass a wide diversity of forms with some showing rela.tion-
ships to the flagellates, while others closely resemble colorless algae, and still others
• are true molds. The vegetative body (thallus) may be non-specialized and entirely con-
verted into a reproductive organ (holocarpic), or it may bear tapering rhizoids, or be
mycelial and very extensive. The outstanding characteristics of the thallus is a tendency
to be nonseptate and, in most groups, multinucliate; cross walls are laid down in vigorously
growing material only to delimit the reporductive organs. The spore unit of nonsexual re-
production is borne in a sporangium, and, in aquatic and semiaquatic orders, is provided
with a single posterior or anterior flagellum or two laterally attached ones. Sexual activity
in the phycomycetes characteristically results in the formation of resting spores.
2' (I1) Hyphal filaments when present septate, without zoospores, with or without sporangia,
usually with conida; sexual reproduction absent or culminating in the formation of asci
or basidia -. 8
3 (2) Flagellated cells characteristically produced '. 4
3' Flagellated cells lacking or rarely produced 7
4 (3) Motile cells uniflagellate ' '. 5
4' Motile cells biflagellate 6
5 (4) Zoospores posteriorly uniflagellate, formed inside the sporangium. . . class. . .Chytridiomycetes
The Chytridiomycetes produce asexual zoospores with a single posterior whiplash
flagellum. The thallus is highly variable; the most primitive forms are unicellular and
holocarpic and in their early stages of development are plasmodial (lack cell walls), more
advanced forms develop rhizoids and with further evolutionary progress develop mycelium.
The principle chemical component of the cell wall is chitin, but cellulose is also present.
Chytrids are typically aquatic organisms but may be found in other habitats. Some species
are chitinolytic and/or keratinolytic. Chytrids may be isolated from nature by baiting (e.g.
hemp seeds or pine pollen) Chytrids occur both in marine and fresh water habitats and are
of some ec'onomic importance due to their parasitism of algae and animals. The genus
Dermocystidium may be provisionally grouped with the chytrids. Species of this genus
cause serious epidemics of oysters and marine and fresh water fish.
5' Zoospores anteriorly uniflagellate, formed inside or outside the sporangium class
Hyphochytridiomycetes
These fungi are aquatic (fresh water or marine) chytrid-like fungi whose motile cells
possess a single anterior flagellum of the tinsel type (feather-like). They are parasitic on
• algae and fungi or may be saprobic. Cell walls contain chitin with some species also demon-
strating cellulose content. Little information is available on the biology of this class and
at present it is limited to less than 20 species.
6 (41) Flagella nearly equal, one whiplash the other tinsel class Oomycetes
A number of representatives of the Oomycetes have been shown to have cellulosic cell
walls. The mycelium is coenocytic, branched and well developed in most cases. The sexual
process results in the formation of a resting spore of the oogamous type, i. e. , a type of
fertilization in which two heterogametangia come in contact and fuse their contents through
a pore or tube. The thalli in this class range from unicellular to profusely branched
filamentous types. Most forms are eucarpic; zoospores are produced throughout the class
except in the more highly advanced species. Certain species are of economic importance due
to their destruction of food crops (potatoes and grapes) while others cause serious diseases of
fish (e. g. Saprolegina parasitical. Members of the family Saprolegniaceae are the common
11-6
-------
Fungi
"water molds1' and are among the most ubiquitous fungi in nature. The order Lagenidiales
includes only a few species which are parasitic on algae, small animals, and other aquatic
life. The somatic structures of this taxon are holocarpic and endobiotic. The sewage fungi
are classified in the order Leptomitales. Fungi of this/order are characterized by the
formation of refractile constrictions; ''cellulin plugs" occur throughout the thalli or, at least,
at the bases of hyphae or to cut off reproductive structures. Leptomitus lacteus may
produce rather extensive fouling floes or slimes in organically enriched waters.
6' Flagella of unequal size, both whiplash class. . . Plasmodiophorornycetes
Members of this class are obligate endoparasites of vascular plants, algae, and fungi.
The thallus qonsists of a plasmodium which develops within the'host cells. Nuclear division
at some stages of the life cycle is of a type found in no other fungi but known to occur in
protozoa. Zoosporangia which arise directly from the plasmodium bear zobspores with two
unequal anterior falgella. The cell walls of these fungi apparently lack cellulose.
7(3') Mainly -saprobic, sex cell when present a zy go spore. • class.... Zveomycetes
This class has well developed mycelium with septa developed in portions of the
older hyphae; actively growing hyphae are normally non-septate. The asexual spores are
non-motile sporangiospores (aplanospores). Such spores lack flagella and are usually
aerialy disseminated. Sexual reproduction is initiated by the fusion of two gametangia
with resultant formation of a thick-walled, resting spore, .the zygospore. In the more
advanced species, the sporangia or the sporangiospores are conidia-like. Many of the
Zygomycetes are of economic importance due to their ability to synthesize commercially
valuable organic acids and alcohols, to transform steroids such as cortisone, and .to
parasitize and destroy food crops. A few species are capable of causing disease in man
and animals (zygomycosis).
7' Obligate commensals of arthropods, zygospores usually lacking class. . . . Trichomycetes
The Trichomycetes are an ill-studied group of fungi which appear to be obligate
commensals of arthropods. The trichomycetes are associated with a wide variety of insecta.
diplopods, and Crustacea of terrestrial and aquatic {fresh and marine) habitats. None of
the members of this class have been cultured in vitro for continued periods of times with any
success. Asexual reproduction is by means of sporangiospores. Zygospores have been
observed in species of several orders.
8 (2l) Sexual spores borne in asci class Ascomycetes
In the Ascomycetes the products of meiosis, the ascospores, are borne in sac
like structures termed asci. The ascus usually contains eight ascospores, but the number
produced may vary with the species or strain. Most species produce extensive septate
mycelium. This large class is divided into two subclasses on the presence or absence
of an ascocarp. The Hemiascomycetidae lack an ascocarp and do not produce ascogenous
hyphae; this subclass includes the true yeasts. The Euascomycetidae usually are divided
into three series (Plectomycetes, Pyrenomycetes, and Discomycetes) on the basis of
ascacarp structure.
8' Sexual spores borne on basidia class Basidiomycetes
The Basidiomycetes generally are considered the most highly evolved of the fungi.
Karyogamy and meiosis occur in the basidium which bears sexual exogenous spores,
basidiospores. The mushrooms, toadstools, rusts, and smuts are included in this class.
8" Sexual stage lacking : .Form class.(Fungi Imperfecti)..Deuteromycetes
The Deuteromycetes is a form class for those fungi (with morphological affinities
to the Ascomycetes or Basidiomycetes) which have not demonstrated a sexual stage.
The generally employed classification scheme for these fungi is based on the morphology
and color of the asexual reproductive stages. This scheme is briefly outlined below.
Newer concepts of the classification based on conidium development after the classical
work of S. J. Hughes (1953) may eventually replace the gross morphology system (see
Barron 1968).
11-7
-------
Fungi
KEY TO THE FORM-ORDERS OF THE FUNGI IMPERFECT! .
1 Reproduction by means of conidia, oidia, or by budding 2
I1 No reproductive structures present Mycelia Sterilia
2 (1) Reproduction by means of conidia borne in pycnidia , Sphaeropsidales
2' Conidia, when formed, not in cycnidia 3
3 (2') Conidia borne in acervuli Melanconiales
3' Conidia borne otherwise, or reproduction by oidia or by budding Moniliales
KEY TO THE FORM-FAMILIES OF THE MONILIALES
1 Reproduction mainly by unicellular budding, yeast-like; mycelial phase, if present,
secondary, arthrospores occasionally produced, manifest melanin pigmentation lacking 2
I1 Thallus mainly filamentous; dark melanin pigments sometimes produced 3
2 (1) Ballistospores produced Sporobolomycetaceae
2' No ballistospores Cryptococcaceae
3 Conidiophores, if present, not united into sporodochia or synnemata 4
3' Sporodochia present • Tuberculariaceae •
3" Synnemata present .. - . Stilbellaceae
4 (3) Conidia and conidiophores or oidia hyaline or brightly colored Moniliaceae .
4' Conidia and/or conidiophores, containing dark melanin pigment Dematiaceae
11-8
-------
Fungi
SELECTED REFERENCES
Ahearn, D. G., Roth, F.J. Jr., Meyers, S. P.
Ecology and Charact erization of Yeasts
from Aquatic Regions of South Florida. .
Marine Biology 1:291-308. 1968
Alexopoulos, J. C. Introductory Mycology.
2nd ed. John Wileyand Sons, New York,
613 pp. 1962
Barron, G. L. The Genera of Hyphomycetes
from Soil. Williams and Wilkins Co.,
Baltimore. 364 pp. 1968
Cooke, W.B. Population Effects on the
Fungus Population of a Stream.
Ecology 42:1-18. 1961
. A Laboratory Guide to Fungi in
Polluted Waters, Sewage, and Sewage
Treatment Systems. U. S. Dept. of
Health, Education and Welfare. Cincinnati.
132 pp. 1963
. Fungi in Sludge Digesters.
Purdue Univ. Proc. 20th Industrial
Waste Conference, pp 6-17. 1965a
The Enumeration of Yeast
Populations in a Sewage Treatment Plant.
Mycologia 57:696-703. 1965b
. Fungal Populations in Relation
to Pollution of the Bear River, Idaho-Utah.
UtahAcad. Proc. 44(1):298-315. 1967
and Matsuura, George S. A Study
of Yeast Populations in a Waste Stabilization
Pond System. Protoplasma 57:163-187.
1963
, Phaff. H.J., Miller. M.W.,
Shifrine, M.. and Khapp, E. Yeasts
in Polluted Water and Sewage.
Mycologia 52:210-230. 1960
Emerson, Ralph and Weston, W.H.
Aqualinderella fermentans Gen. et Sp.
Nov., A Phycomycete Adapted to
Stagnant waters. I. Morphology and
Occurrence in Nature. Amer. J.
Botany 54:702-719. 1967
Hughes, S.J. Conidiophores, Conidia and
Classification. Can. J. Bot. 31:577-
659. 1953
Johnson, T.W., Jr. Saprobic Marine Fungi.
pp. 95-104. InAinsworth, G. C. and
Sussman, A.S. The Fungi, III.
Academic Press, New York. 1968
and Sparrow, F.K., Jr. Fungi
in Oceans and Estuaries. Weinheim,
Germany. 668 pp. 1961
Meyers, S.P. Observations on the Physio-
logical Ecology of Marine Fungi. Bull.
Misaki Mr. Biol. Inst. 12:207-225. 1968
Prigsheim, E.G. Iron Bacteria. Biol. Revs.
Cambridge Phil. Soc. 24:200-245. 1949
.Sparrow, F. K., Jr. Aquatic Phycomycetes.
2nd ed. Univ. Mich. Press, AnnArbor.
1187 pp. 1960.
. Ecology of Freshwater Fungi.
pp. 41-93. InAinsworth, G. C. and
Sussman, A.S. The Fungi, III. Acad.
Press, New York. 1968
Stokes, J. L. Studies on the Filamentous
Sheathed Iron Bacterium Sphaerotilus
natans. J. Bacteriol. 67:278-291. 1954
van Uden, N. and Fell, J.W. Marine Yeasts.
pp. 167-201. In Droop. M.R. and Wood.
E. J.F. Advances in Microbiology of
the Sea, I. Academic Press. New York.
1968
Yerkes, W. D. Observations on an Occurrence
of Leptomitus lacteus in Wisconsin.
Mycologia 58:976-978. 1966
Cooke. William B. and Ludzack, F.J.
Predacious Fungus Behavior in
Activated Sludge Systems. Jour. Water
Poll. Cont. Fed. 30(12):1490-1495. 1958.
11-9
-------
FRESHWATER POLLUTION ECOLOGY
Q. WHAT IS ECOLOGY?
A. The science of the interrelation between living
organisms and their environment.
Q. WHAT IS NOT ECOLOGY?
A. Not much!
T. T. Macan
-------
BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF NATURAL SELF PURIFICATION
I INTRODUCTION
A The results of natural self purification
processes are readily observed. Did they
not exist, sewage (and other organic
wastes) would forever remain, and the
world as we know it would long ago have
become uninhabitable. Physical, chemical,
and biological factors are involved. The
microscopic and macroscopic animals
and plants in a body of water receiving
organic wastes are not only exposed to all
of the various (ecological) conditions in
that water, but they themselves create and
profoundly modify certain of those conditions.
B Since toxic chemicals kill some of or all
of the aquatic organisms, their presence
disrupts the natural self purification
processes, and hence, will not be considered
here. The following discussion is based
solely on the effects of organic pollution'
such as sewage or other readily oxidizable
organic wastes.
C This description is based on the concept of
a "stream" since under the circumstances
of stream or river flow, the events and
conditions occur in a linear succession.
The same fundamental processes occur in
lakes, estuaries, and oceans, except that
the sequence of events may become
telescoped or confused due to the reduction
or variability of water movements.
D The particular biota (plants and animals,
or flora and fauna) employed as illustrations
below are typical of central United States.
Similar or equivalent forms occur in
similar circumstances in other parts of
the world.
E This presentation is based on an unpublished
chart produced by Dr. C.M. Tarzwell and
his co-workers in 1951. Examples from
this chart are employed in the presentation.
II THE STARTING POINT
A A normal unpolluted stream is assumed
as a starting point. (Figure 1)
B The cycle of life is in reasonably stable
balance.
C A great variety of life is present, but no
one species or type predominates.
D The organisms present are adjusted to the
normal ranges of physical and chemical
factors characteristic of the region, such
as the following:
1 The latitude, turbidity, typical cloud
cover, etc. affect the amount of light
penetration and hence photosynthesis.
2 The slope, cross sectional area, and
nature of the bottom affect the rate of
flow, and hence the type of organisms
present deposition of sludge, etc.
3 The temperature affects both certain
physical characteristics of the water,
and the rate of biological activity
(metabolism).
4 Dissolved substances naturally present
in the water greatly affect living
organisms (hard water vs. soft water
fauna and flora).
E Clean water zones can usually be
characterized as follows:
1 General features:
a Dissolved oxygen high
b BOD low
c Turbidity low
d Organic content low
BI. ECO.nap.5c. 12.70
12-1
-------
Biological Aspects of Natural Self Purification
H
THE BIOTA
2 1
24 12
3 4
DAYS
12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108
MILES
Figure 1: Relations between variety and abundance (production) of aquatic life,
as organic pollution (discharged at mile 0) is carried down a stream. Time
and distance scales are only relative and will be found to differ in nearly every
case. After Bartsch and Ingram.
12-2
-------
Biological Aspects of Natural Self Purification
e Bacterial count low
f Numbers of species high
g Numbers of organisms of each species
moderate or low
h Bottom free of sludge deposits
2 Characteristic biota includes a wide
variety of forms such as:
a A variety of algae and native higher
(vascular, or rooted) plants
b Caddis fly larvae (Trichoptera)
c Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera)
d Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera)
e Damselfly larvae (Zygoptera)
f Beetles (Coleoptera)
g Clams (Pelecypoda)
h Fish such as:
- Minnows (Notropid types)
- Darters (Etheostomatidae)
- Millers thumb (Cottidae)
- Sunfishes and basses (Centrarchidae)
- Sauger, yellow perch, etc. (Percidae)
- Others
3 Organisms characteristic of clean lakes,
estuaries, or oceanic shores might be
substituted for the above, and likewise
in the following sections. However, it
should be recognized that no single
habitat is as thoroughly understood in
this regard as the freshwater stream.
Ill POLLUTION
A With the introduction of organic pollution
(Figure 1, day 0), a succession of fairly
well organized events are initiated.
Important items to observe in interpreting
the pollutional significance of stream
organisms are the following:
B Numbers of species present, they tend to
decrease with pollution.
C Numbers of individuals of each species
tends to increase with pollution.
D Ratios between types of organisms are
disturbed by pollution.
1 Clean water species intolerant of
organic pollution tend to become scarce
•and unhealthy.
2 Animals with air breathing devices or
habits tend to increase in numbers.
3 Scavengers become dominant
4 Predators disappear
5 Higher plants, green algae, arid most
diatoms tend to disappear.
6. Blue green algae often become
conspicious
E The importance of observations on any
single species is very slight.
IV THE ZONE OF RECENT POLLUTION
A The zone of recent pollution begins with
the act of pollution, the introduction of
excessive organic matter: food for
microorganisms (Figure 1, day 0)
B There follows a period of physical mixing.
C Many animals and plants are smothered
or shaded out by the suspended material.
D With, this enormous new supply of food
material, bacteria and other saprophytic
microorganisms begin to increase
rapidly.
12-3
-------
Biological Aspects of Natural Self Purification
E The elimination of intolerant predatory
animals allows the larger scavengers to
take full advantage of the situation.
F This explosive growth of organisms,
particularly fungi and bacteria, draws
heavily on the free dissolved oxygen for
respiration, and may eventually eliminate it.
G The number of types of organisms diminishes
but numbers of individuals of tolerant types
may increase.
H Zone of degeneration, or recent pollution,
can usually be characterized as follows:
1 General features:
a DO variable, 2 ppm to saturation
b BOD high
c Turbidity high
d Organic content high
e Bacterial count variable to high
f Number of species declines from
clean water zone
g Number of organisms per species
tends to increase
h Other: Slime may appear on bottom
2 Characteristic biota:
a Fewer higher plants, but rank heavy
growth of those which persist
b Increase in tolerant green, and blue
green algae
c Midge larvae (Chironomidae) may
become extremely abundant
d Back swimmers (Corixidae) and water
boatmen (Notonectidae) often present
e Sludge worms (Tubificidae) common
to abundant.
f Dragonflies (Anisoptera) often present
have unique tail breathing strainer
g Fish types, eg:
- Fathead minnows (Pimephales
promelas)
- White sucker (Catostomus
commersonni )
- Bowfin (Amia calva)
- Carp (Cyprinus carpio)
V THE SEPTIC ZONE
A The exact location of the beginning of the
septic zone, if one occurs, varies with
season and other circumstances.
(Figure 1, day 1)
B Lack of free DO kills many microorganisms
and nearly all larger plants and animals,
again replenishing the mass of dead
organic material.
C Varieties of both macro and micro-
organisms and adjustable types (facultative)
that can live in the absence of free oxygen
(anaerobic)take over.
D These organisms continue to feed on their
bonanza of food (pollution) until it is
depleted.
E The numbers of types of organisms is now
at a minimum, numbers of individuals
may or may not be at a maximum.
F The septic zone, or zone of putrefaction
can usually be characterized as follows:
1 General features:
a Little or no DO during warm weather.
b BOD high but decreasing
c Turbidity high, dark; odoriferous
d Organic content high but decreasing
12-4
-------
Biological Aspects of Natural Self Purification
e Bacterial count high
f Number of species very low
g Number of organisms may be extremely
high
h Other: Slime blanket and sludge
deposits usually present, oily
appearance on surface, rising gas
bubbles
2 Characteristic biota:
a Blue green algae
b Mosquito larvae
c Rat-tailed maggots
d Sludge worms (Tubificidae and similar
forms). Small, red, segmented
(annelid) worms seem to be character-
istic of this zone in both fresh and
salt waters, the world around.
e Air breathing snails (Physa for
example)
f Fish types: None
3 Note: Fortunately, all polluted waters
do not always degenerate to "septic"
conditions.
VI THE RECOVERY ZONE
A The septic zone gradually merges into the
recovery zone. (Figure 1, day 4)
B As the excessive food reserves diminish
so do the numbers of anaerobic organisms
and other pollution tolerant forms.
C As the excessive demand for oxygen
diminishes, free DO begins to appear and
likewise oxygen requiring (aerobic)
organisms.
D As the suspended material is reduced and
available mineral materials increase due
to microbial action, algae begin to increase
often in great abundance.
E Photosynthesis by the algae releases more
oxygen, thus hastening recovery.
F Since algae require oxygen at all times
for respiration (like animals), heavy
concentrations of algae will deplete free
DO during the night when it is not being
replenished by photosynthesis.
G Consequently this zone is characterized
by extreme diurnal fluctuations in DO.
H With oxygen for respiration and algae, etc.
for food, general animal growth is resumed.
I The stream may now enter a period of
excessive productivity which-lasts until
the accumulated energy (food) reserves
have been dissipated.
J Zone of recovery may usually be
characterized as follows:
1 General features:
a DO 2 ppm to saturation
b BOD dropping
c Turbidity dropping, less color and
odor
d Organic content dropping
e Bacterial count dropping
f Numbers of species increasing
g Numbers of organisms per species
decreasing, (with the increase in
competition)
h Other: Less slime and sludge
2 Characteristic biota
a Blue green algae
b Tolerant green flagellates and other
algae
c Rooted higher plants in lower reaches
d Midge larve (Chironomids)
12-5
-------
Biological Aspects of Natural Self Purification
e Black fly larvae (Simulium)
f Giant water bugs (Belostoma spp.)
g Clams (Megalonais)
h Fish types:
- Green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus)
- Common sucker (Catostomus
commersonni)
- Flathea'd catfish (Pylodictis olivaris)
- Stoneroller minnow (Campostoma
anomalum)
- Buffalo (Ictlobus cyprinellus)
Excessive production and extreme
variability often characterize middle and
lower recovery zones.
4 Unfortunately, many waters once polluted
never completely "recover". Re-
pollution is the rule in many areas so
that after the initial pollution, clear
out delineation of zones is not possible.
Characterization of these waters may
involve such parameters as productivity,
BOD, some "index" figure, or other
value not included here.
VII CLEAN WATER ZONE
A Clean water conditions again obtain when
productivity has returned to a normal,
relatively poor level, and a well balanced
varied flora and fauna are present.
(Figure 1, day "10") Conditions may
usually be characterized as follows:
B General features: similar to upstream
clean water except that it is now a larger
stream.
C Characteristic biota: similar to upstream
clean water fauna and flora except that
species include those indigenous to a
larger stream.
REFERENCES
1 Bartsch, A.F. and Ingram, W.M.
Stream Life and the Pollution Environ-
ment. Public Works Publications,
July 1959, Vol. 90, No. 7, pp. 104-110.*
2 Gaufin, A.R. and Tarzwell, C.M.
Aquatic invertebrates as indicators of
stream pollution. Reprint No. 3141
fromPHR. 67 (l):57-64. 1952.
3 Gaufin, A.R. and Tarzwell, C.M.
Environmental changes in a polluted
stream during winter. Am. Midland
Naturalist. 54:68-88; 1955.
4 Gaufin, A.R. and Tarzwell, C.M.
Aquatic macro-invertebrate communities
as indicators of organic pollution in
Lytle Creek. Sewage and Ind. Wastes.
28:906-24. 1956.
5 Hynes, H.B.N. The Biology of Polluted
Waters. Liverpool Univ. Press.
pp. 202. 1963.
6 Katz, M. and Gaufin, A.R. The effects
of sewage pollution on the fish population
of a midwestern stream. Trans. Am.
Fisheries Soc. 82:156-65. 1952. *
7 Reish, D. J. The Relationship of the
Polychaetous Annelid Capitella capitata
(Fabricius) to Waste Discharges of
Biological Origin. In: Biol. Prob.
Water Pol. - Trans. 1959 Seminar.
Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering
Center, USPHS, Cincinnati, OH.
pp. 195-200.
8 Biology of Water Pollution FWQA Pub.
CWA-3 (references with an asterisk
are reprinted in this publication. 1967.
This outline was prepared by H. W. Jackson,
Chief Biologist, National Training Center,
DTTB, MDS, WPQ EPA, Cincinnati,",
OH 45268.
12-6
-------
ECOLOGY OF WASTE STABILIZATION PROCESSES
I INTRODUCTION
Living organisms will live where they can live.
This holds for treatment plant environments
just as it does for streams, impoundments,
oceans, dry or wet lands.
A Each species has certain limits or toler-
ances, growth, feeding habits and other
characteristics that determine its favored
habitat.
B The presence of certain organisms with
well defined characteristics in a viable
condition and in significant numbers also
provides some inference with respect to
the habitat.
C The indicator organism concept has certain
pitfalls. It is not sufficient to base an
opinion upon one or more critters which
may have been there as a result of gas
liquid or solid transport. It is necessary
to observe growth patterns, associated
organisms, environmental conditions, and
nutritional characteristics to provide
information on environmental acceptability.
D Organisms characteristic of wastewater
treatment commonly are those found in
nature under low DO conditions. Perform-
ance characteristics are related to
certain organism progressions and assoc-
iations that are influenced by food to
organism ratios and pertinent conditions.
One single species is unlikely to perfprm
all of the functions expected during waste
treatment. Many associated organisms
compete in an ecological system for a
favored position. The combination includes
synergistic, antagonistic, competitive,
predative, and other relationships that may
favor predominance of one group for a time
and other groups under other conditions.
E It is the responsibility of the treatment
plant control team to manage conditions
of treatment to favor the best attainable
performance during each hour of the day
each day of the year. This outline con-'
siders certain biological characteristics
and their implications with respect to
treatment performance.
H TREATMENT PLANT ORGANISMS
Wastewater is characterized by overfertili-
zation from the standpoint of nutritional
elements, by varying amounts of items that
may not enter the metabolic pattern but have
some effect upon it, such as silt, and by
materials that will interfere with metabolic
patterns. Components vary in availability
from those that are readily acceptable to
those that persist for long periods of time.
Each item has some effect upon the organism
response to the mixture.
A Slime forming organisms including certain
bacteria, fungi, yeasts; protista monera
and alga tend to grow rapidly on dissolved
nutrients under favorable conditions. These
grow rapidly enough to dominate the overall
population during early stages of growth.
There may be tremendous numbers of
relatively few species until available
nutrients have been converted to cell mass
or other limiting factors check the pop-
ulation explosion.
B Abundant slime growth favors production
of predator organisms such as amoeba or
flagellates. These feed upon preformed
cell mass. Amoebas tend to flow around
particulate materials; flagellates also are
relatively inefficient food gatherers. They
tend to become numerous when the nutrient
level is high. They are likely to be assoc-
iated with floculated masses where food
is more abundant.
C Ciliated organisms are more efficient
food gatherers because they have the
ability to move more readily and may
set up currents in the water to bring food
.to them for ingestion. Stalked ciliates
are implicated with well stabilized effluents
because they are capable of sweeping the
fine particulates from the water between
floe masses while their residues tend to
become associated with the floe.
D Larger organisms tend to become establish-
ed later and serve as scavengers. These
include Oligochaetes (worms), Chironomids
(bloodworms and insect larvae), Isopods
(sow bugs and crustacea), Rotifera'and
others.
PC. 19.10.69
12-7
-------
Ecology of Waste Stabilization Processes
in TREATMENT OPERATIONAL CONTROL
An established treatment plant is likely to
contain representative organisms from all
groups of tolerant species. Trickling filters,
activated sludge, or ponds tend to retain
previously developed organisms in large
numbers relative to the incoming feed. The
number and variety available determine the
nature, degree and time required for partial
oxidation and conversion of pollutants from
liquid to solid concentrates.
A Proliferation of slime forming organisms
characterize the new unit because they grow
rapidly on soluble nutrients. Predators
and scavengers may start growing as soon
as cell mass particulates appear but growth
rate is slower and numbers and mass lag
as compared with slime organisms. As
slime growth slows due to conversion of
soluble nutrients to cell mass, the slime
formers tend to associate as agglomerates
or clumps promoting floculation and liquid
' solid separation.
B Overfeeding an established unit encourages
rapid growth of slime'organisms as individ-
ual cells rather than as flocculated masses.
This results in certain characteristics
resembling those of a young, rapidly
growing system.
C Toxic feeds or unfavorable conditions
materially reduce the population of exposed
sensitive organisms. The net effect is a
population selection requiring rapid regrowth
to reestablish desired operating character-
istics. The system assumes new growth
characteristics to a degree depending upon
the fraction remaining after the toxic effect
has been relieved by dilution, degradation,
sorption, or other means.
D Treatment units are characterized by
changes in response to feed sequence.
load ratio, and physical or chemical
conditions. Response to accute toxicity
may be immediately apparent. Chronic
overloading or mild toxicity may not be
apparent for several days. It may be
expected that it will require 1 to 3 weeks
to restore effective performance after any
major upset. Performance criteria may
not indicate a smooth progression toward
improved operation.
E Observations of the growth characteristics
and populations do not provide quantitative
information, but they do indicate trends
and stages of development that are useful
to identify problems. It is not possible to
identify most slime organisms by direct
observation. It is possible to recognize
growth and flocculation characteristics.
Certain larger organisms are recognizable
and are useful as indicator organisms to
suggest past or subsequent developments.
IV ILLUSTRATIONS OF ECOLOGICAL
SIGNIFICANCE
A The first group represents initial devel-
opment of non-flocculent growth. Single
celled and filamentous growth are shown.
Rapid growth shows little evidence of
flocculation that is necessary to produce
a stable, clear effluent.
B The next group of slides indicate develop-
ment of floe forming tendencies from
filamentous or non-filamentous growth.
Clarification and compaction characteris-
tics are relatable to the nature and density
of floe masses.
C Organisms likely to be associated with
more stabilized sludges are shown in the
third group. Scavengers essentially con-
sist of a large alimentary canal with
accessories.
D The last two slides illustrate changes in
appearance after a toxic load. Scavengers,
ciliates, etc. have been inactivated. New
growth at the edge of the floe masses are
not apparent. Physical structure indicates
dispersed residue rather than agglomera-
tion tendencies. The floe probably contains
living organisms protected by the surround-
ing organic material, but only time and
regrowth will reestablish a working floe
with good stabilization and clarification
tendencies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This outline contains significant materials from
previous outlines by H. W. Jackson and R. M.
Sinclair. Slide illustrations were provided by
Dr. Jackson.
This outline was prepared by F. J. Ludzack,
Chemist, National Training Center, WPO,
EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
12-8
-------
THE INTERPRETATION OF BIOLOGICAL DATA
WITH REFERENCE TO WATER QUALITY
I INTRODUCTION
Sanitary engineers like to have data
presented to them in a readily assimilable
form and some of them seem a little
impatient with biologists who appear unable
to provide definite quantitative criteria
applicable to all kinds of water conditions.
I think the feeling tends to be that this is
the fault of biologists, and if they would
only pull themselves out of the scientific
stone-age all would be well. I will try to
explain here why I believe that biological
data can never be absolute nor interpret-
able without a certain amount of expertise.
In this respect biologists resemble medical
men who make their diagnoses against a
complex background of detailed knowledge.
Anyone can diagnose an open wound but it
takes a doctor to identify an obscure
disease; and although he can explain how
he does it he cannot pass on his knowledge
in that one explanation. Similarly, one
does not need an expert to recognize gross
organic pollution, but only a biologist can
interpret more subtle biological conditions
in a water body; and here again he can
explain how he does it, but that does not
make his hearer a biologist. Beck (1957)
said something similar at a previous
symposium in Cincinnati in 1956.
II THE COMPLEXITY OF BIOLOGICAL
REACTIONS TO WATER CONDITIONS
A Complexity of the Aquatic Habitat
The aquatic habitat is complex and
consists not only of water but of the
substrata beneath it, which may be
only indirectly influenced by the quality
of the water. Moreover, in biological
terms, water quality includes such
features as rate of flow and tempera-
ture regime, which are not considered
of direct importance by the chemist.
To many animals and plants, maximum
summer temperature or maximum
rate of flow is just as important as
minimum oxygen tension. The result
is that inland waters provide an
enormous array of different com-
binations of conditions, each of which
has its own community of plants and
animals; and the variety of species
involved is very great. Thus, for
example, Germany has about 6000
species of aquatic animals (lilies 196la)
and probably at least as many species
of plants. Yet Europe has a rather
restricted fauna because of the
Pleistocene ice age; in most other
parts of the world the flora and fauna
are even richer.
Distribution of Species and Environ-
mental Factors
We know something about the way in
which species are distributed in the
various habitats, especially in the
relatively much studied continent of
Europe, but we have, as yet, little
idea as to what factors or combination
of factors actually control the individual
species.
1 Important ecological factors
Thus, it is possible to list the
groups of organisms that occur in
swift stony upland rivers
(rhithron in the sense of lilies,
1961b) and to contrast them with
those of the lower sluggish reaches
(potamon). Similarly we know,
more or less, the different floras
and faunas we can expect in
infertile (oligotrophic) and fertile
(eutrcphic) lakes. We are, however,
much less informed as to just what
ecological factors cause these
differences. We know they include
temperature and its yearly
BI.EN. Id. 3.71
13-1
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
amplitude; oxygen, particularly at
minimal levels; plant nutrients,
such as nitrate, phosphate, silica,
and bicarbonate; other ions in
solution, including calcium, chloride,
and possibly hydrogen; dissolved
organic matter, which is necessary
for some bacteria and fungi and
probably for some algae; the nature
of the substratum; and current.
Complexity of interacting factors
We also know these factors can
interact in a complex manner and
that their action on any particular
organism can be indirect through
other members of the biota.
a Induced periphyton growths
Heavy growths of encrusting
algae induced by large amounts
of plant nutrients, or of
bacteria induced by ample
supplies of organic matter,
can eliminate or decimate
populations of lithophile insects
by simple mechanical inter-
ference. But the change does
not stop there: the growths
themselves provide habitats
for the animals, such as
Chironomidae and Naidid worms,
which could not otherwise live
on the stones.
b Oxygen levels and depositing
substrates
If oxygen conditions over a
muddy bottom reach levels
just low enough to be intolerable
to leeches, tubificid worms,
which the leeches normally
hold in check, are able to build
up to enormous numbers
especially as some of their
competitors (e.g. Chironomus)
are also eliminated.
c Oxygen levels and non muddy
substrates
One then finds the typical
outburst of sludge worms, so
often cited as indicators of
pollution. This does not
happen if the same oxygen
tension occurs over sand or
rock, however, as these are
not suitable substrata for the
worms. Many such examples
could be given, but they would
only be ones we understand;
there must be a far greater
number about which we know
nothing.
d One must conclude, therefore,
that quite simple chemical
changes can produce far-
reaching biological effects;
that we only understand a
small proportion of them; and
that they are not always the
same.
3 Classic examples
This seems like a note of despair,
however, if water quality deviates
too far from normal, the effects
are immediately apparent. Thus,
poisonous substances eliminate
many species and may leave no
animals (Hynes 1960); excessive
quantities of salt remove all
leeches, amphipods, and most
insects and leave a fauna con-
sisting largely of Chironomidae,
caddis worms, and oligochaetes
(Albrecht 1954) and excessive
amounts of dissolved organic
matter give rise to carpets of
sewage fungus, which never occur
naturally. Here no great biologi-
cal expertise is needed, and there
. is little difficulty in the
communication of results. It is
when effects are slighter and more
subtle that biological findings
13-2
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
III
become difficult to transmit
intelligibly to other disciplines.
THE PROBLEMS IN PRESENTATION
OF BIOLOGICAL RESULTS
Because of these difficulties various
attempts have-been made to simplify the
presentation of biological findings, but to
my mind none of them is very successful
because of the complexity of the subject.
Early attempts at systematization developed
almost independently on the two sides of
the Atlantic, although they had some
similarities.
A Early Studies in the United States
(Richardson and the Illinois River)
In America, there was a simple division
into zones of pollution, e.g. degradation,
septic, and recovery, which were
characterized in broad general terms.
This simple, textbook approach is
summarized by Whipple et al. (1947),
and serves fairly well for categorizing
gross organic pollution such as has been
mentioned above. It was, however,
soon found by Richardson (1929) during
his classical studies on the Illinois
River that typical "indicators" of foul
conditions, such as Tubificidae and
Chironomus, were not always present
where they would be expected to occur.
This was an early indication that it is
not the water quality itself that provides
suitable conditions for "pollution faunas, "
but other, usually associated, conditions -
in this instance deposits of rich organic
mud. Such conditions may, in fact, be
present in places where water quality
in no way resembles pollution, e. g.,
upstream of weirs in trout streams
where autumn leaves accumulate and
decay and cause the development of
biota typical of organically polluted
water. Samples must therefore be
judged against a background of biological
knowledge. Richardson was fully aware
of this and was in no doubt about the
condition of the Illinois River even in
places where his samples showed few
or no pollution indicators.
B The European Saprobic System
In Europe, the initial stress was
primarily on microorganisms and
results were first codified in the
early years of the century by
Kolkwitz and Mars son. In this
"Saprobiensystem, " zones of organic
pollution similar to those described
by the American workers were defined
and organisms were listed as charac-
teristic of one or more zones;
TABLE 1
SAPROBIENSYSTEM - A European system
of classifying organisms according to their
response to the organic pollution in slow
moving streams. (22)
Alpha-Mesosaprobic Zone - Area of
active decomposition, partly aerobic,
partly anaerobic, in a stream heavily
polluted with organic wastes.
Beta-Mesosaprobic Zone - That reach
of stream that is moderately polluted
with organic wastes.
Oligosaprobic Zone - That reach of a
stream that is slightly polluted with
organic wastes and contains the
mineralized products of self-
purification from organic pollution,
but with none of the organic pollutants
remaining.
Polvsaprobic Zone - That area of a
grossly polluted stream which contains
the complex organic wastes that are
decomposing primarily by anaerobic
processes.
A recent exposition of this list is
given by Kolkwitz (1950). It was then
claimed that with a list of the species
occurring at a particular point it was
possible to allocate it to a saprobic
zone. This system early met with
criticism for several reasons. First,
13-3
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to .Water Quality
TABLE 2
SAPROBICITY LEVELS ACCORDING TO THE TROPHIC
STRUCTURE OF THE COMMUNITIES OF ORGANISMS
Saprobicity Level
Structure of the Communities of Organisms
I /3-oligosaprobic
Balanced relationship between producers, consumers
and destroyers; the communities of organisms are
poor in individuals but there is a moderate variety of
species, small biomass and low bioactivity.
II a-oligosaprobic
Balanced relationship between producers, consumers
and destroyers; communities of organisms are rich in
individuals and species with a large biomass and high
bioactivity.
Ill /3-mesosaprobic
Substantially balanced relationship between producers,
consumers and destroyers; a relative increase in the
abundance of destroyers and, accordingly, of the con-
sumers living off them; communities of organisms are
rich in individuals and species with a large biomass and
high bioactivity.
IV a-mesosaprobic
V j3-polysaprobic
Producers decline as compared with an increase in
consumers and destroyers; mixotrophic and amphitrophic
forms predominate among the producers; communities of
organisms rich in individuals but poor in species with a
large biomass and extremely high bioactivity; still only
few species of macro-organisms; mass development of
bacteria and bacteria-eating ciliates.
Producers drastically decline; communities of organisms
are extremely rich in individuals but poor in species with
a large biomass and high bioactivity; macrofauna represented
only by a few species of tubificids and chironomids; as in
IV these are in great abundance; mass development of
bacteria and bacteria-eating ciliates.
VI a -polysaprobic
Producers are absent; the total biomass is formed
practically solely by anaerobic bacteria and fungi;
macro-organisms are absent; flagellates outnumber
ciliates amongst the protozoa.
Saprobicity - "Within the bioactivity of a body of water, Saprobicity is the sum
total of all those metabolic processes which are the antithesis of
primary production. It is therefore the sum total of all those
processes which are accompanied by a loss of potential energy. "
Part I, Prague Convention.
13-4
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
all the organisms listed occurred in
natural habitats --they were not evolved
in polluted water--and there was much
doubt as to the placing of many of the
species in the lists. The system, how-
ever, did serve to codify ecological
knowledge about a long list of species
along an extended trophic scale. Its
weaknesses appeared to be merely due
to lack of knowledge; such a rigid
system took far too little account of the
complexity of the reaction of organisms
to their habitats. For instance, many
organisms can be found, albeit rarely,
in a wide range of conditions and others
may occur in restricted zones for
reasons that have nothing to do with
water quality. We often do not know if
organisms confined to clean headwaters
are kept there by high oxygen content,
low summer temperatures, or inability
to compete with other species under
other conditions. In the swift waters of
Switzerland the system broke down in
that some organisms appeared in more
polluted zones than their position in the
lists would indicate. Presumably here
the controlling factor was oxygen, which
was relatively plentiful in turbulent cold
water. In a recent series of experiments,
Zimmerman (1962) has proven that
current alone has a great influence on
the biota, and identically polluted water
flowing at different speeds produces
biotic communities characteristic of
different saprobic levels. He finds this
surprising, but to me it seems an
expected result, for the reasons given
above.
C Recent Advances in the Saprobic System
1 Perhaps Zimmerman's surprise
reflects the deeply rooted entrench-
ment of the Saprobiensystem in
Central Europe. Despite its obvious
shortcomings it has been revised
and extended. Liebmann (1951)
introduced the concept of consider-
ing number as well as occurrence
and very rightly pointed out that the
community of organisms is what
matters rather than mere species
lists. But he did not stress the
importance of extrinsic factors,
such as current, nor that the
system can only apply to organic
pollution and that different types
of organic pollution differ in their
effects; e.g., carbohydrate solu-
tions from paper works produce
different results from those of
sewage, as they contain little
nitrogen a'nd very different sus-
pended solids. Other workers
(Sladecek 1961 and references
therein) have subdivided the more
polluted zones, which now, instead
of being merely descriptive, are
considered to represent definite
ranges of oxygen content, BOD,
sulfide, and even E. coli populations.
Every water chemist knows that
BOD and oxygen content are not
directly related and to assume that
either should be more than vaguely
related to the complexities of
biological reactions seems to me
to indicate a fundamental lack of
ecological understanding. I also
think it is damaging to the hope of
mutual understanding between the
various disciplines concerned with
water quality to give the impression
that one can expect to find a close
and rigid relationship between
water quality measurements as
assessed by different sets of
parameters. Inevitably these
relationships vary with local con-
ditions; what applies in a sluggish
river in summer will certainly not
apply to a mountain stream or even
to the same river in the winter.
Correlation of data, even within
one discipline, needs understanding,
knowledge, and judgment.
Caspers and Schulz (1960) showed
that the failure of the system to
distinguish between waters that are
naturally productive and those
artifically enriched can lead to
absurd results. They studied a
canal in Hamburg, which because
of its urban situation can only be
regarded as grossly polluted.
Yet it develops a rich plankton.
13-5
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
the composition of which, -according
to the system, shows it to be
virtually clean.
D Numerical Application of the Saprobic
System
Once the Saprobiensystem was accepted
it was logical to attempt to reduce its
findings to simple figures or graphs for
presentation of results. Several such
methods were developed, which are
described by Tumpling (1960), who also
gives the original references. In all
these methods, the abundance of each
species is recorded on some sort of
logarithmic scale (e.g. "1 for present,
3 for frequent, 5 for common, etc.).
The sums of these abundances in each
saprobic level are plotted on graphs,
the two most polluted zones showing as
negative and others as positive. Or, the
various saprobic levels are given
numerical values [1 for oligosaprobic
(clean), 2 for/3-mesosaprobic, etc.]
and the rating for each species is
multiplied by its abundance number.
The sum of all these products divided
by the sum of all the frequencies gives
a "saprobic index" for the locality.
Clearly the higher this number, the
worse the water quality in terms of
organic pollution. In a similar way the
so-called "relative Belastung" (relative .
load) is calculated by expressing the
sums of all the abundances of organisms-
characteristic of the two most-polluted
zones as a percentage of the sum of all
abundances. Then 100 percent is
completely polluted water, and clean •
localities will give a low number.
E Weaknesses of the Saprobic System
There are various elaborations of these
methods, such as sharing of species
between zones and taking account of
changes in base-line as one passes
downstream. None of them, however,
eliminates the basic weaknesses of the
system nor the fact that, as Caspers
and Schulz (1960) point out, there is
little agreement between the various
authors in the assignment of species to
the different levels. Therefore, one
gains a number or a figure that looks
precise and is easily understood, but
it is based on very dubious foundations.
F Comparative North American Systems
Similar systems are indigenous to
North America, but were independently
evolved.
1 Wurtz (1955) and Wurtz and Dolan
(1960) describe a system whereby
animals are divided into sensitive-
to-pollution and non-sensitive
(others are ignored), and also into
burrowing, sessile, and foraging
species (six classes).
BSFP BSFP BSFP BSFP BSFP BSFP BSFP BSFP BSFP
e/28/48
RECWRT DEGRAD.
IOO
Figure 1. Histograms, based on selected organisms, illustrating stream
reaches of clean, degradation, septic, and recovery conditions [after
Wurfi] (22)
Numbers of these species rep-
resented are plotted for each station
as six histograms on the basis of
percentage of total number of
species. If the constitution of the
fauna from control stations or from
similar localities is known, it is
possible to express numerically
"biological depression" (i.e.,
percentage reduction in total
13-6
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
number of species), "biological
distortion (changes in pro-
portions of tolerant and non-tolerant
species), and "biological skewness"
(changes in the ratios of the three
habitat classes). Such results must,
of course, be evaluated, and the
definition of tolerance is quite
subjective; but the method.has the
advantages of simplicity and depend-
ence on control data. Like the
Saprobiensystem, however, it can
have no universal validity. It also
suffers from the fact that it takes
no account of numbers; a single
specimen, which may be there by
accident, carries as much weight
as a dense population.
Patrick (1949) developed a similar
system in which several clean
stations on the water body being
investigated are chosen, and the
average number of species is deter-
mined occurring in each of seven
groups of taxa chosen because of
their supposed reaction to pollution.
These are then plotted as seven
columns of equal height, and data
from other stations are plotted on
the same scale; it is assumed that
stations differing markedly from the
controls will show biological
imbalance in that the columns will be
of very unequal heights. Number is
indicated by double width in any
column containing species with an
unusual number of individuals.
I have already questioned the use-
fulness of this method of presentation
(Hynes 1960), and doubt whether it
gives anymore readily assimilable
data than simple tabulation; it does
however, introduce the concept of
ecological imbalance.
200:
130
AA
ZOO
190
23
II
.Ill
44i
SEMI-HEALTHY
II
i.
3
VERY POLLUTED
Figure 2. Histograms, based on selected organisms, illustrating healthy,
semi-healthy, polluted, and very polluted stations in Conestoga
Basin, Pa. [ after Patrick ] (22)
TABLE 3 —Classification of Groups
of Organisms Shown in Figure2
I Blue-green algae; green algae of the genera Stigeoc/onium, Spi-
rogyra, and Tribonema; the bdelloid rotifers plus Cephafodeffa
megafocephafo and Proo/es decipiens
II Oligochaetes, leeches, and pulmonate snails
III Protozoa
IV Diatoms, red algae, and "most of the green algae"
V ' All rotifers not included in Group I, clams, gill-breathing snails,
and tricladid flatworms
VI All insects and Crustacea
VII All fish
Beak (1964), another author,
recognized the need for a concise
expression of pollution based on
biological information. Toward
this end, he developed a method of
biological scoring which is based on
the frequency of occurrence of
certain macroscopic invertebrates
obtained from 6 years of study on
one river. It will be noted that the
Biological Score is a modification
and expansion of Beck's Biotic
Index.
13-7
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
The indicator organisms are
divided into three categories:
Group I contains the pollution -
tolerant species; Group II comprises
those species which are facultative
with respect to pollution; and
Group III contains the pollution-
intolerant forms. Each group is
assigned a weighted score that can
be allotted to field samples on the
following basis:
a Normal complement of Group III
scores 3 points.
b Normal complement of Group II
scores 2 points.
c Normal complement of Group I
scores 1 point.
The scores are additive; thus an .
unpolluted stream will have a
Biological Score of 6. If only
pollution-tolerant forms are found,
the score will be 1. If no organisms
are found, the score will be zero.
Furthermore, a score of, 1 or 2
points could be allotted to Group in
when less than the normal com-
plement is present. Group II could
be treated in a similar manner.
This scoring device correlated well
with the biological oxygen demand,
dissolved oxygen; and solids content
of the receiving water. Beak also
related his scoring device to the
fisheries potential. This relation- :
ship is shown in Table 4]
TABLE 4
TBNTATIVE RELATIONSHIP OF THE BIOLOGICAL SCORE TO THE FISHUIES
It has long been known that
: ecologically severe habitats con-
tain fewer species than normal
habitats and that 'the few species
that can survive the severe con-
ditions are often very abundant as
they lack competitors. Examples
of this are the countless millions
of Artemia and Ephydra in saline
lakes and the Tubifex tubifex in
foul mud. This idea has often been
expressed in terms of diversity,
which is some measure of numbers
of species divided by number of
specimens collected. Clearly,
such a parameter is larger the
greater the diversity, and hence
the normality of the habitat.
Unfortunately, though as the
number of species in any habitat
is fixed, it also decreases as
sample size increases so no index
of diversity has any absolute value
(Hairston 1959). If a definite
sample size is fixed, however, in
respect to numbers of organisms
identified, it is possible to arrive
at a constant index.
POTENTIAL (after Beak,
1964) (30)
Pollution status Biotie index Fisheries potential
Unpolluted 6
Slight to moderate pollution 5 or 4
Moderate pollution 3
Moderate to heavy pollution 2
Heavy pollution 1
Severe pollution, usually toxic 0
All normal fisheries for type of
water well developed
Most sensitive fish species re-
duced in numbers or missing
Only coarse fisheries maintained
11 fish present, only those with
high toleration of pollution
Very little, if any, fishery
No fish
1 . 10 20
Miles from source
Figure 3. Zooplankton species diversity
per thousand individuals encountered in
marine systems affected by waste waters
from petrochemical industrial wastes.
The vertical lines indicate seasonal
variations. (30)
13-8
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
Patrick et al. (1954). in effect used
this concept in a study of diatom
species growing on slides suspended
in water for fixed periods. They
identified 8000 specimens per
sample and plotted the results as
number of species per interval
against number of specimens per
species on a logarithmic scale.
This method of plotting gives a
truncated normal curve for a wide
variety of biotic communities.
In an ordinarily diverse habitat the
mode is high and the curve short;
i.e., many species occur in small
numbers and none is very abundant.
In a severe habitat the mode is low
and the curve long; i. e.,there are
few rare species and a few with
large numbers. This, again, seems
to me to be an elaborate way of
presenting data and to involve a lot
of unnecessary arithmetic.
l-Z 2-4 4-8 8-16 16-32 32-64 64-128 128- 256- 512- 1C24- 2C4S- 4036-
256 512 1024 2048 40% 8192
Number of individuals per species
Figure 4. A graphic comparison of diatom
communities from two different environ-
ments. (After Patrick et al., 1954) (30)
6 Diversity indices vs tabulated data
Allanson (1961) has applied this
method to the invertebrate faunas
of streams in South Africa and has
shown, as has Patrick for diatoms,
that the log normal curve is flatter
and longer for polluted stations;
the difference, however, is not so
apparent that it does not need
exposition. Here, again, I would
suggest that tabulated data are just
as informative. Indeed I would go
further and say that tabulated data
are essential in the present state
of our knowledge. We are learning
as we go along and if the details of
the basic findings are concealed by
some sort of arithmetical manip-
ulation they cannot be re-interpreted
in the light of later knowledge, nor
are they preserved in the store of
human knowledge. This point
becomes particularly clear when
one examines some of the early
studies that include tables.
Butcher (1946) requotes a con-
siderable amount of data he
collected from studies of various
English rivers during the thirties;
they are not only clear and easy to
follow, but they are also informative
about the generalities of pollution
in a way that data quoted only
within the confines of some
particular system are not.
7 Examples of tabulated data( Table 5)
Simple tabulation of biological data
in relation to water quality, either
in terms of number of organisms,
percentage composition of the biota,
some arbitrary abundance scale,
or as histograms, has been
effectively practiced in many parts
of the world: in America (Gaufin
and Tarzwell 1952, Gaufin 1958),
Africa (Harrison 1958 and 1960,
Hynes and Williams 1962). Europe
(Albrecht 1954, Kaiser 1951,
Hynes 1961, Hynes and Roberts ••
1962), and New Zealand (Hirsch ,
1958) to cite a few. These tabu-
lated data are easy to follow, are j
informative to the expert reader, i
and conceal no facts. Although the
non -biologist may find them tedious,
he need only read the explanatory
paragraphs. It is a delusion to
think that it is possible to reduce ',
biological data to simple numerical
levels. At best, these can only be
produced for limited situations and
13-9
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
TABLE 5
QBOAHiae
Eoothannium
Dendroaoma
Gpongllla fragilia
Trochoapongilla leidjrl
Unidentified Sponge
Cordylophon lacuatrto
Dugeala tigrloa
Urnatalla gracilis
Paludicella articulate,
Frederlcella, tultana
Prlatina
Rale commmla
Paranoia
Unidentified Leech
Unidentified Beetle
Coaoborua punctlpenala
BydrOboenua ep. A
Crlcotopua blcinctua
Unidentified Tendipedini
HarniBchie, ap. A
Tendlpea nervoaua
Tendipea modes tua
Poljpedilum ap. B
CeaopeectA exlgua
Tryccrythodea
Stenoaene,
Atbrlpaodee
Potamrta flam
Cheumatopayche
PejcbcHrtldBe Ge'mia A •
Perrlaaia ahlnekii
Quadruia ap.
Quadrula tiiberculata '
Corblcula flimVTB
TOTAL
?06.
left
P
C
C
5
C
C
C
31
1
59
1
51
k
152
1 nowe
mid
7
C
»>7
5
14
* •>•
1
22
1
9O
298
r Unr
right
2
C
1
5
2
16
2
2
a.
5
56
left
C
P
k
C
r
i
9
7
5
1
1
2
-U
141
It
30
b
11
261
2OT •*
•Id
F
A
k
P
»
1
117
23
U
12
3
5
5k
229
B71
rlstt i
A
6
F
1
68
l
2
15
7
w'
U>
17 .-
l>3
92
33
1
•2
!•
381
left
Vt
F
F
1
1
1
. 1
3
1
1
19
2
11
7
1
• 77
llil
1
P01.1
nil
A
A
7
26
1
8
2
Ito
131
3
30
l'l
5
'7'
153
right
F
19
F
F
1
Ii
10
S3*
11
«
21 '
1
19
7 '
1.3.7
•y
-,»,
abundant
Pickwick Tailwater
(35) .
r - rev C - ccnvm A -
Benthos from
even then they need verbal exposition;
at worst, they give a spurious im-
pression of having absolute validity.
•-•-. •:-•'*: • -" •*
8 Comparison of stations
My final point in this section con-
cerns comparisons. It is claimed
that the German system, in effect,
measures an absolute state, a
definite level of water quality. We
have seen that this is not a tenable
claim. In the other systems, by
and large, the need to establish
local control stations at which to
measure the normal or "natural"
biotic conditions is accepted, and
, then other areas are compared with
this supposed norm. This is, of
course not always possible as there
may remain no unaffected area, or
no unaffected area that is, with
respect to such factors as current,
nature of substratum, etc.,
sufficiently similar to act as a
base-line for data. Nevertheless,
basically., these systems can be
used.to compare stations and thus
to assess changes in water quality. '
In doing this, they can all be used
mbre or less successfully, but I
maintain that a table is just as use-
ful as an elaborate analysis, and
I believe that the table.should be
included with whatever is done.
For a particular situation, however,
i it is often possible to distill the data
.- into a single figure as a measure of
similarity between stations.
[•Q Coefficients of similarity
Burlington (1962) and Dean and Bur-
lington (1963) have recently proposed
an entirely objective means of doing
this, which involves simple arith-
metical manipulation. In his system,
; a "prominence value" is calculated
for each species at each station.
This is a product of its density and
some function of its frequency in
samples, but the details of this
calculation can be altered to suit
any particular situation. Then a
coefficient of similarity between
each pair of stations can be calcu-
lated by dividing twice the sum of
the lower prominence values of taxa
that the two stations have in common
by the sum of all the prominence
values of both stations. Identical
stations will then have a coefficient
of similarity of 1:00; this coefficient
will be lower the more the stations
differ from one another. This is an
easy way to compare stations in an
entirely unbiased way and as such
may satisfy the need for numerical
exposition; however, it tells one
nothing about why the localities are
different and like all the other more
or less numerical methods of pre-
senting data has no absolute value.
Moreover, it still leaves unanswered
the fundamental question of how
different is "different? "
13-10
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
TABLE 6
•^ Clean
4 '•
g> WATER QUALITY (high multiple use indicated^
*"* A. Jv
c /| Organisms in Order of Tendency to Disappear as PS
g_ V . • Degree of Pollution Increases *
Types of
Organisms
Present
Plecoptera
nymph
present
Ephemeroptera
nymph
present
Trichoptera
larvae
present
Gammaridae
present
Asellus and/or
Ltrceus
present
Tubificid worms,
Tendipes . and
Cricotopus
blcinctus
(one or more of
these groups)
All above types
absent
BIOTIC INDEX
. Variety Present
More than one species
One species only
More than one species
jf
One species only
More than one species
One species only *
All above species absent
All above species absent
All above species absent
Some organisms such as
Eristalis tenax not requiring
dissolved oxygen may be present
V Total Number of Groups
Present •
0-1.
—
— '
~
—
—
4
3
2
1
0
2-5
Bio
7
6
6
5
5
4
4
3
2
1
6-10
Inde
8
7
7
6
6
5 __,
5
4
3
2
11-15
9
8
8
7
7
6
6
5
4
~
16+
10
9
9-*
8
8
7
7
6
—
*Stenonema nepotellum excluded 10* main stream reservoirs and west Tennessee streams
* Stenonema nepotellum (Ephem.) is counted in this section, for the purpose of classification.
V ONE FOR EACH KNOWN SPECIES 'IN THESE GROUPS:
Platyhelminthes
Hirudinea
Mollusca
Crustacea
Plecoptera
Dlptera (excluding specific ones listed below)
Coleoptera
Neuroptera (
ONE FOR EACH GROUP. REGARDLESS OF NUMBER OF SPECIES, ETC.:
Annelida excluding Naididae
Naididae
Each Mayfly genera (excluding Stenonema nepotellum)
Stenonema nepotellum
Each Trichoptera family
Chironomidae (excluding specific ones listed below)
Chironomus riparlus and plumpsus and Crtcotopus bicinctus.
Family Simuliidae
adapted from Trent River Board - Tennessee Stream Pollution Control Board 8/66 RMS
13-11
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data With Reference to Water Quality
IV THE PROBLEMS OF SAMPLING
The systems outlined above are all based on
the assumption that it is possible to sample
an aquatic, habitat with some degree of
accuracy; this is a dubious assumption,
however, when applied to biological data.
From what has been said about the com-
plexity of biological reactions to. the various
factors in the environment, and from the
obvious fact that rivers especially are a
mosaic of • microhabitats, it is clear that to
achieve numerical accuracy or even some
limits of confidence considerable numbers
of samples need to be taken. Indeed, even
in so apparently unvaried a habitat as a
single riffle, Needham and Usinger (1956).
showed that a very large number of samples
would be necessary to give significant
numerical data.
A Representative Sampling
There is a limit to the number of sam-
ples that can reasonably be taken and,
anyway, it is desirable to sample many
different types of habitat so as to get
as broad as possible an estimate of the
biota. -
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
V CONCLUSIONS
It may appear from the previous sections
that my attitude to this problem is entirely
obstructionist. This is far from being so.
Water quality is as much biological phenom-
enon as it is a chemical or physical one;
often what we want to know about water is
almost exclusively biological -- will it smell
nasty, is it fit to drink, can one bathe in it,
etc? I suggest, therefore, that it is desirable
to organize water monitoring programs that
will tell one what one wants to know. There
is no point in measuring everything biolog-
ical, just as there is no point in performing
every possible chemical analysis; what is
measured should be related to local conditions.
It would be a waste of time to measure
oxygen content in a clean mountain stream;
we know it to be high, and it becomes worth
measuring only if we suspect that it may
have been lowered by pollution. Similarly,
there is little point in studying the plankton
in such a stream; we know it only reflects
the benthic flora. In a lake or in a slow
river, on the other hand, if our interest in
the water lies in its potability, records of
the plankton are of considerable importance
as changes in plankton are, in fact, changes
in the usability of the water.
A Periphyton arid Benthos Studies
For long-term studies, especially for
the recording of trends or changes
induced by pollution, altered drainage,
agricultural poisons, and other havoc
wrought by man, one can expect in-
formative results from two principal
techniques: First, we can study
microscopic plant and animal growth
with glass slides placed in the water for
fixed periods; second, we can obtain
random samples of the benthic fauna.
The algae and associated microfauna
tell one a good deal about the nutrient
condition of the water and the changes
that occur in it, and the larger b'enthic
fauna reveal changes in the trophic
status, siltation due to soil erosion,
effects of insecticides and other poisons,
etc.
B Varying Levels of Complexity
The study of growths on glass slides is
reasonably skilled work, but can easily
be taught to technicians; like chemical
monitoring, such study needs to be
done fairly often. Sampling the benthos
is more difficult and, as explained
above, needs expert handling; unlike
most other monitoring programs,
however, it need be done only in-
frequently, say, once or twice a year.
Inevitably sampling methods will vary
with type of habitat; in each case, the
question will arise as to whether it is
worth looking at the fish also. It is
here that the biologist must exercise
judgment in devising and carrying out
the sampling program.
' C Data Interpretation
Judgment is also needed in the inter-
pretation of the data. It is for this
reason I maintain that it should all be
tabulated so that it remains available
for reassessment or comparison with
later surveys. If need be, some sort
of numerical format can be prepared
from the data for ad hoc uses, but it
should never become a substitute for
tabulations. Only in this way can we
go on building up our knowledge.
Perhaps some day we shall be able to
pass all this information into a com-
puter, which will then be able to
exercise better judgment than the
biologist. I hope this will happen, as
computers are better able to remember
and to cope with complexity than men.
It will not, however, pension off the
biologist. He will .still be needed to
collect and identify the samples.
I cannot imagine any computer wading
about on rocky riffles nor persuading
outboard motors and mechanical grabs
to operate from the unstable confines"
of small boats. We shall still need
flesh and blood biologists long after the
advent of the hardware water chemist,
even though, with reference to my
earlier analogy, a Tokyo University
13-13
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
computer recently outpointed 10 veteran
medicals in diagnosing brain tumors and
heart disease. It should be pointed out,
however, that the computer still had to be
fed with information, so we are still
a long way from the hardware general
practitioner. I believe though that he is
likely to evolve before the hardware
biologist; after all, he studies only one
animal.
REFERENCES
1 Albrecht, M. L. Die Wirkung der
Kaliabwasser auf die Fauna der
Werra and Wipper. Z. Fisch. N.
3:401-26. 1954.
F.
2 Allanson, B. R. Investigations into the
ecology of polluted inland waters in
the Transvaal. Part I. Hydrobiologia
18:1-94. 1961.
3 Bartsch, A. F. and Ingram, W. M.
Biological Analysis of Water Pollution
in North America. Verb. Internat.
Verein. Limnol. 16:788-800. 1968.
4 Beak, T. W., de Courval, C. and
Cooke, N. E. Pollution monitoring
and prevention by use of bivariate
control charts. Sew. Industr.
Wastes 31:1383-94. 1959.
5 Beck, W. M., Jr. The Use and Abuse of
Indicator Organisms. Transactions
of a Seminar on Biological Problems
in Water Pollution. Cincinnati. 1957.
6 Burlington, R. F. Quantitative Biological
Assessment of Pollution. J. Wat.
Poll. Contr. Fed. 34:179-83. 1962.
7 Butcher, R. W. The Biological Detection
of Pollution. J. Inst. Sew. Purif.
2:92-7. 1946.
8 Cairns, John, Jr. et al. A Preliminary
Report on Rapid Biological Information
Systems for Water Pollution Control.
JWPCF. 42(5):685-703. 1970.
9 Caspers, H. and Schulz, H. Studien
zur Wertung der Saprobiensysteme.
Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 45:535-65.
1960.
10 Dean, J. M. and Burlington, R. F.
A Quantitative Evaluation of Pollution
Effects on Stream Communities.
Hydrobiologia 21:193-9. 1963.
11 Ferdjingstad, E. Taxonomy and
Saprobic Valency of Benthic Phyto-
microorganisms. • Inter. Revue der
Ges. Hydrobiol. 50(4):475-604. 1965.
12 Ferdjingstad, E. Pollution of Streams
Estimated by Benthal Phytomicro-
organisms. I. A System Based on
Communities of Organisms and
Ecological Factors. Int. Revue ges.
Hydrobiol. 49:63-131.
13 Gaufin, A. R. The Effects of Pollution
on a Midwestern Stream. Ohio J.
Sci. 58:197-208. 1958.
14 Gaufin, A. R. and Tarzwell, C. M.
Aquatic Invertebrates as Indicators
of Stream Pollution. Pub. Hlth.
Rep. 67:57-64. 1952.
15 Hairston, N. G. Species Abundance and
Community Organization. Ecology
40:404-15. 1959.
16 Harrison, A. D. The Effects of Sulphuric
Acid Pollution on the Biology of
Streams in the Transvaal, South
Africa. Verb. Int. Ver. Limnol.
13:603-10. 1958.
17 Harrison, A. D. The role of River Fauna
in the Assessment of Pollution.
Cons. Sci. Afr. Sud Sahara Pub.
64:199-212. 1960.
18 Hirsch, A. Biological Evaluation of
Organic Pollution of New Zealand
Streams. N.Z. J. Sci. 1:500-53.
1958.
19 Hynes, H. B. N. The Biology of
Polluted Waters. Liverpool. 1960.
20 Hynes, H. B. N. The Effect of Sheep-
dip Containing the Insecticide BHC
on the Fauna of a Small Stream.
Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit.
55:192-6. 1961.
21 Hynes, H. B. N. and Roberts, F.W.
The Biological Effects of Detergents
in the River Lee, Hertfordshire.
Ann. Appl. Biol. 50:779-90. 1962.
22 Hynes, H. B. N. and Williams, T. R.
The Effect of DDT on the Fauna of
a Central African Stream. Ann. Trop.
• Med. Parasit. 56:78-91. 1962.
23 lilies, J. Die Lebensgemeinschaft des
Bergbaches. Wittenberg-Luther stadt.
1961a.
13-14
-------
The Interpretation of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
24 lilies, J. Versuch einer allgemeiner
biozonotischen Gliederung der
Fliessgewasser. Int. Rev. ges
Hydrobiol. 46:205-13. 1961b.
25 Ingram, W. M., Mackenthun, K. M., and
Bartsch, A. F. Biological Field
Investigative Data for Water Pollution
Surveys. USDI, FWPCA Pub. WP-13,
139 pages. 1966.
26 Kaiser, E. W. Biolgiske, biokemiske,
bacteriologiske samt hydrometriske
undersogelser af Poleaen 1946 og
1947. Dansk. Ingenforen. Skr.
3:15-33. 1951.
27 Keup, Lowell E., Ingram, W. M., and
Mackenthun, K. M. Biology of Water
Pollution. USDI. FWPCA CWA-3,
290 pages. 1967.
28 Kolkwitz, R. Oekologie der Saprobien.
Uber die Beziehungen der Wasser-
organismen zur Ummelt. Schr.
Reihe ver Wasserhyg. 4:64 pp. 1950.
29 Liebmann, H. Handbuch der Frischwasser
und Abwasserbiologie. Munich. 1951.
30 Maciel, Norma C. Levantamento
hipotetico de um rio com rtde
Surber. Inst. de Engenharia Sanitaria,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Pub. No. 58,
96 pages. 1969. (Zones of pollution
in a Brazilian river.)
31 Mackenthun, K. M. The Practice of
Water Pollution Biology. USDI.
FWPCA. 281 pp. 1969.
32 Needham, P. R. and Usinger, R. L.
Variability in the Macrofauna of a
Single Riffle in Prosser Creek,
California, as indicated by the Surber
Sampler. Hilgardia 24:383-409. 1956.
33 Olson, Theodore A., and Burgess, F. J.
Pollution and Marine Ecology. Inter-
science Publishers. 364 pages. 1967.
34 Patrick, R. A Proposed Biological
Measure of Stream Conditions, based
on a Survey of the Conestoga Basin,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.
101:277-341. 1949.
35 Patrick, R. A Study of the Numbers and
Kinds of Species found in Rivers in
Eastern United States. Proc. Acad.
Nat. Sci. Phila. 113:215-58. 1961.
36 Patrick, R., Hohn, M. H. and Wallace,
J. H. A New Method for Determining
the Pattern of the Diatom Flora.
Not. Nat. Phila. Acad. Sci. 259.
12 pp. 1954.
37 Patrick, Ruth. Benthic Stream Com-
munities. Amer. Sci. 58:546-549.
1970.
38 Richardson, R. E. The Bottom Fauna of
the Middle Illinois River, 1913-1925;
Its Distribution, Abundance, Valuation
and Index Value in the Study of Stream
Pollution. BuU. 111. Nat. Hist. Surv.
17:387-475. 1929.
39 Sinclair, Ralph M., and Ingram,
William M. A New Record for the
Asiatic Clam in the United States-'-
The Tennessee River. Nautilus
74(3):114-118. 1961. (A typical
benthos faunal list for a large inland
unpolluted river, with an eroding
substrate.)
40 Sladecek, Vladimir. Water Quality
System. Verh. Internat. Verein.
Limnol. 16:809-816. 1966.
41 Sladecek, V. Zur biologischen
Gliederung der hoheren Saprobi-
tatsstufen. Arch. Hydrobiol.
58:103-21. 1961.
42 Sladecek, Vladimir. The Ecological and
Physiological Trends in the Sapro-
biology. Hydrobiol. 30:513-526.
1967.
43 Tumpling, W. V. Probleme, Methoden
und Ergenbnisse biologischer
Guteuntersuchungen an Vorflutern,
dargestellt am Beispiel der Werra.
45:513-34. 1960.
44 Whipple, G. C., Fair. G. M. and
Whipple, M. C. The Microscopy of
Drinking Water. New York. 1947.
45 Woodiwiss, F. S. The Biological System
of Stream Classification used by the
Trent River Board. Chem. and Ind.,
pp. 443-447. March 1964.
46 Wurtz, C. B. and Dolan, T. A Biological
Method Used in the Evaluation of Effects
of Thermal Discharge in the Schuylkill
River. Proc. Ind. Waste Conf. Purdue.
461-72. 1960.
13-15
-------
The Interpretation'of Biological Data with Reference to Water Quality
47 Zimmerman, P. Der Einfluss auf die
Zusammensetzung der Lebensgemein-
schaften in Experiment. Schweiz. Z.
Hydrol. 24:408-11. 1962.
48 Hynes, H. B. N. The Ecology of Flowing
Waters in Relation to Management.
JWPCF. 42(3):418-424. 1970.
49 Hynes, H. B. N. The Ecology of Running
Waters. Univ. of Toronto Press. 555 pp.
1970.
50 Scott, Ralph D. The Macro-invertebrate
Biotic Index - A Water Quality Measure-
ment and Natural Continuous Stream
Monitor for the Miami River Basin.
17 pp. The Miami Conservancy District,
Dayton, OH 45402. 1969.
51 Cooke, Norman E. Stream Surveys
Pinpoint Pollution. Industrial Water
Engineering, p. 31-33. Sept. 1970.
This outline was prepared by Dr. H. B. N.
Hynes, Chairman, Department of Biology,
University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Reprinted from: Symposium Environmental
Measurements Valid Data and Logical .
Interpretation, July. 1964, PHS Publication
No. 999-AP-15, ppi, 289-298.
Figures, tables, additional references, and
headings are editorial changes by Ralph
Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist, National Training
Center, Water Programs Operations, EPA,
Cincinnati, OH 45268.
13-16
-------
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION ON AQUATIC LIFE '
I INTRODUCTION
A The effluent from any given industrial
plant may be combined with municipal
sewage, and/or wastes from other
industries. This may occur in the
sewerage system or in a natural body
of water.
1 Toxic wastes may inhibit biota of
treatment plant as well as life in
receiving stream.
2 Organic wastes may simply increase
sewage-type load on plant and stream.
3 The above effects may be reinforced
or neutralized by a complex of
industrial wastes.
B The general overall character of a body
of water may be subtly changed over a
period of time.
The principle of limiting factors (see
Figure 1) deals with the response of
organisms to various factors in the
environment.
Liebig's Law of the Minimum (Figure 1)
states that the distribution of a species
may be limited by one or more essential
environmental factors which occur in
minimal quantities.
Shelford on the other hand pointed out in
his Law of Tolerance (Figure 1) that there
are also maximum values of most
environmental factors which can be
tolerated. In between these two extremes
there are ranges which may be called
"optimum" for factors useful to the
organism. Purely deleterious factors
on the other hand have a maximum tol-
erable value, but no optimum. The
range between the maximum concentration
(greater than zero) which kills no orga-
nism and the minimum concentration
which kills all organisms is known as
the "critical range."
These principles apply to all aquatic life
whether in a stream, lake, estuary, or
treatment plant. They are the basis for
the control or regulation of biological
conditions.
IE INDIRECT TOXICITY: MODIFICATIONS
OF THE ENVIRONMENT WHICH AFFECT
AQUATIC LIFE
A Deposition of inert precipitates and silt
tends to smother bottom organisms.
Contributing materials include silt or
sand from erosion due to poor agricul-
tural practices, rock flour or tailings
from mining or quarry operations, mica,
coal washings, sawdust and debris from
lumbering, insoluble precipitates or
complexes from chemical industries.
1 Vulnerable organisms include
important fish foods such as insect
larvae and snails; also fish eggs,
bottom-living algae such as diatoms,
and many others.
2 Physical injury to delicate membranes
of eyes, and gills may also result.
3 Inert suspended materials and dyes
reduce light penetration, suppress
photosynthesis and hence biological
productivity. They also prevent game
fish and other predators from seeing
their prey, thereby reducing the
efficiency of food utilization.
The word stream should be interpreted in
most cases to mean "river, " "lake, "
"estuary, " etc., as applicable.
BI. BIO. Ilk. 5. 71
14-1
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
CD
.X
o
•8 8,
« "
y c
§ §
u
tt
Liebig's Law
Shelfords Law
Extinction
Extinction
Low
Magnitude of Factor
•High
Figure 1. EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Wastes of significant heat content may
change the "climate" of a body of water.
Temperature may be higher or lower
than normal.
1 Abnormally low summer temperatures
may prevent the reproduction of some
of the typical inhabitants, on the other
hand colder water forms such as trout
may be enabled to survive.
2 Abnormally high winter temperatures
may encourage a rapid development
of some species, thus for example,
causing an early emergence of some
insect followed by its death from normal
winter temperatures. Southern forms
may also invade more northerly waters,
sometimes leading to a year-round
nuisance from flying swarms of adults
such as caddis flies.
3 Artificially produced high temperatures,
often lack dependability. It is dis-
couraging for organisms to spend six
days in summer temperatures in
January, only to freeze to death over
the weekend because no one warned
them that the plant would shut down!
4 Excessively high summer temperatures,
even for a few hours once a year,
probably represent the greatest tem-
perature danger. Some species of fish
can adjust to temperatures approaching
1000 F, if the change takes place slowly.
Each species however, has some
maximum temperature above which
it cannot survive (Figure 1).
a Quick temperature changes are
fatal at much lower values.
b Lack of oxygen due to low solubility
at high temperatures or from an
increase in the rate of the BOD,
also contributes greatly to high
temperature mortalities.
C Oxygen-consuming wastes kill by depleting
the free dissolved oxygen resources.
1 Amount present, rather than percentage
of saturation, is usually more significant.
2 Minimum amounts rather than averages
are most critical.
a Any species can survive something
less than the optimum concentration
of DO for a limited period of time.
There is, however, some concen-
tration for any given temperature,
which will eventually result in the
death of that species. Let us call
this the "critical" DO.
b As the DO faUs below the critical
concentration, survival time
eventually drops to zero.
14-2
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
c The absolute values of these thresh-
olds vary with the species and other
factors. Five mg O_ per liter is
often listed as a minimum permissible
value to maintain a well-rounded •
healthy population of fishes on a year-
round basis.
Low oxygen tensions may also increase
the toxicity of certain chemicals.
D pH
IV
"pH" is a logarithmic expression of the
hydrogen ion concentration in a solution.
Hydrogen ions (H+) in certain concen-
trations are toxic to aquatic life
(as are also hydroxyl ions: OH").
Aquatic life in relative abundance and
variety can be found in waters ranging
from approximately pH 5 to 9; Thriving
communities including algae, insects,
and fish have been studied in waters
with a pH of at least 11.
Many species of aquatic organisms can
adjust to pH values over a wide range.
Sudden change of any kind however can
be fatal.
Most metals and other toxic substances
in dilute solution tend to become less
toxic at high pH values. A notable
exception is ammonia.
POLLUTION WHICH RENDERS FISH OR
SHELLFISH UNUSABLE OR INTERFERES
WITH THEIR CAPTURE
Radioactivity at levels currently found in
our waters has not been observed to
adversely affect aquatic life itself. It may
however, be taken up with food materials
and render fish or fishery products unusable.
1 Radioactive nuclides (forms of chemicals)
are taken up by the plants (predominantly
algae) in the processes of photosynthesis
and other types of protoplasmic syn-
thesis. There is no selection between
nuclides on the basis of radioactivity.
2 As the chemicals originally assimi-
lated by the algae are "eaten up the
food chain" (from algae to inverte-
brates to small fish to.large fish to
man and other predators) their
radioactivity moves along with them.
3 Thus radioactivity is acquired by
fishes essentially through food, and
scarcely at all by direct assimilation
or absorption.
4 Plankton-feeding organisms such as
herrings, oysters, and clams acquire
radioactivity directly from the algae
on which they feed. Since they con-
centrate this food from large volumes
of water, they may be much "hotter"
than the surrounding water itself.
B Fish may be repelled or driven out of an
area by obnoxious chemicals. This may
simply result in their scarcity or absence
from a given locale, or it may prevent
their swimming up a river to spawn. In
this case the species would soon disappear
and be lost to the community.
C Color, odor, oil, floating scum, bacterial
slimes, and other such materials tend to
discourage sport fishing and interfere
with gear used by commercial fisheries.
D Sublethal concentrations of chemicals
such as phenol, benzene,oil, 2-4-D, etc.,
may impart an unpleasant taste to fish
flesh, even when present in very dilute
concentrations. This is nearly as
detrimental to the fisheries as a complete
kill, and of course applies to shellfish
as well as fin fish.
E Minamata disease was first described
from Minamata, Japan, as a disorder
resulting from eating various seafoods
taken from Minamata Bay, Kyushu,
Japan. The disease results from
industrial toxicity, in this case an organic
mercury compound, transmitted to a wide
variety of local marine seafood species.
These organisms are not known to be
affected, but acting as "transvectors, "
14-3
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
pass the toxin along to predators or human
consumers. Over 30% mortality occurred
in Minamata among people eating local
seafood.
1 It may be important to note that a fish
kill was recently reported from a TVA
lake in this country resulting from
mercury leaching from corroded 50
gallon drums used as floats by
marinas.
2 Bird and fish kills have recently
occurred in Swedish lakes resulting
from mercury compounds from pulp.
mills. Levels in pike exceed the WHO
standards for human consumption and
the local population has been advised
not to eat pike more than once a week!
Cases of high mercury levels are increasing.
Acute toxicity can be evaluated by
means of the toxicity bioassay
technique and various modifications
(Figure 2).
DIRECT TOXICITY:
ORGANISM ITSELF
AFFECTS THE
Fish kills are often the result of direct
toxicity. If this is sufficiently potent to kill
at once, or within a few days, it is called
acute, and is often observed as a "fish kill. "
Action that may require weeks or months to
be effective may be referred to as low "level,
cumulative, or chronic toxicity, and is more
often observed as simply a reduction of
productivity: "Fishin1 ain't what it used to
be. " Examples of chemicals often believed
to be involved include: acids, alkalines,
ammonia, chlorine, cyanides, metals,
phenols, solvents, sulfides, synthetic organic
chemicals, oil field brines, pesticides,
herbicides, detergents and others.
A Acute toxicity may be so broadly effective
that many forms of life are affected at one
time, or it may be highly selective. It
may result from a low concentration of a
highly toxic material or a high concentration
of a relatively less toxic material.
1 It is frequently encountered as a "slug"
resulting from a dump or spill, followed
by normal, relatively non-toxic con-
ditions as the mass of water containing
the poison flows oh .downstream, or is
deflected by tidal movements.
Increasing Concentration
Figure 2 - Critical Range
C: maximum concentration at which
no fish die, C1: minimum concen-
tration at which all die. TLgo*.
50% tolerance limit (concentration
tolerable to 50% of the population)
for time t.
B Chronic or low-level toxicity may change
the entire population balance.
1 Susceptible species of either fish or
fish food organisms may die off,
thereby permitting tolerant species
to flourish for lack of competition.
2 If algae and/or invertebrate food
organisms are killed off fish may die
or move out of the area.
3 Weakened individuals are more
susceptible to attack by parasites and
'disease, such as the aquatic fungus
Saproleenia.
4 Reproductive potential may be altered.
Eggs or fry may or may not be more
susceptible to toxic substances than
adults.
5 Host fish for mussel (unionidae) life
cycle may not survive.
14-4
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
6 The result may be a.slow and subtle
alteration of the characteristics of a
stream over an extended period.of time.
C The specific physiological mechanisms
involved are infinite in variety and but
little known. Included are such processes
as enzyme inhibition as in the case with
some of the pesticides, and over .stimu"
lation of mucous membranes of the gills,
leading to death by suffocation.
D There are a number of excellent diagnostic
techniques for the examination of dying
fish, these include pathogenic bacteria,
parasites, some metals, and certain
pesticides. None are routine but require
specific handling and preservation tech-
niques •
E A recently developed procedure for
protecting aquatic life from deleterious
substances is biomonitoring. This is
the continuous monitoring or surveillance
of an effluent for toxicity by means of a
system for exposing living organisms
(such as fish or invertebrates) to a con-
tinuously flowing stream in a dilution just
below the known danger point. Should the
toxicity of the substance increase the test
organisms respond in some recognizable
manner, thus giving warning that correc-
tive measures need to be initiated.
VI MECHANISMS OF POLLUTION
TOLERANCE AND SENSITIVITY
The fact that some organisms are more
resistant to pollution than others needs no
emphasis. The matter of "why?" and "how?"
on the other hand, is quite another question.
In some cases the answer is obvious, in
others not. In general we can say that the
adaptations of certain species enable them
to resist certain types of natural conditions
such as organic deposits or sand bars. When
man artificially creates conditions such as
sludge banks, or sand bars, organisms which
can tolerate such conditions move in, survive,
and often thrive. Other forms are
eliminated.
A Organic pollution is essentially non-toxic.
Its typical result as noted above is
oxygen depletion, physical turbidity, and
smothering blankets of sediment or sludge.
B Devices and mechanisms for living in
oxygen-poor or oxygen-free water include
the following:
1 Obtaining oxygen from the air by means
of periodic trips or access to the
surface.
a The snorkel tube of the rat-tailed
maggot.
b Periodic trips of the mosquito
larvae and Corixidae or water
boatmen. The mosquito takes air
directly into its respiratory system,
the water boatman into a trap or
space beneath the wing covers, as
well as into a layer of air held by
fine hairs or "pile" all over its body.
c Behavior of the air breathing snails
such as Physa which have an internal
lung cavity.
d Insects which tap into air tubes in
aquatic plants.
e Fishes which gulp air at surface or
breathe surface water.
2 Special devices and behavior for
respiration of water
a Hind intestine respiratory
structures of dragonfly larvae
permits respiration in silt-laden
water.
b Movement of gill covers and
similar structures in isopods and
certain insect groups maintains a
current of water over respiratory
organs.
c Body movements of chironomld
larvae create water current in
tibe. Sludge worms
14-5
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
and other annelids also create water
movement by means of sinuous body
movements.
3 Physiological and behavioral adaptations
to endure low oxygen tensions.
a Forms possessing accessory
respiratory pigments such as
hemoglobin might be expected to
be able to be able to extract the
last vestige of dissolved oxygen from
the water. Two groups famous for
resisting low DO do have hemoglobin:
the.-larvae of certain Chironomid
midge flies, and small annelid worms
such as sludge worms, (it should be
noted however, that the hemoglobin
in each case is simply dissolved in
the blood plasma, rather than being
concentrated in special corpuscles
as is the case in the more efficient
vertebrate system.)
b The mere possession of hemoglobin
however, does not seem to assure
tolerance of low DO (Walshe '47).
Larvae of the midge Tanvtarsus SDP.
have hemoglobin, but will not
tolerate oxygen "poor waters.
Hemoglobin-bearing Chironomus
bathopilus is moderately tolerant,
and Chironomus plumosus is highly
tolerant, however.
c During periods of low DO, ChironomuB
plumosus apparently respires carbo"
hydrates as usual, but excretes
excess lactic acid instead of accu-
mulating it.
d Various species of Daphnia (micro-
Crustacea) have been shown to
accumulate hemoglobin in oxygen-
poor waters but not in oxygen-rich
waters (Fox '47). No clear adaptive
significance has yet been proven
however.
C Advantageous Feeding Habits
All highly organic pollution tolerant orga-
nisms are scavengers, and hence find an
abundance of food. Most are relatively
defenseless and hence have normally high
reproductive rate. The result in a
polluted situation is thus usually an
extreme abundance.
D The reverse problem is why are intolerant
species intolerant?
1 A physiological requirement for higher
oxygen levels is probably most basic.
2 Turbidity would hamper any organisms
employing sight in any way.
3 Absence of light would suppress the
growth of green algae, and hence also
restrict the growth of algae feeders.
E Inert silts by themselves have many
damaging effects such as abrasive or
smothering action.
Biological mechanisms for enduring inert
silt or sand pollution are not numerous,
and consequently such locations are
usually known as biological deserts.
Since some life exists even in deserts
however, a few forms may occasionally
be found. In general they are typical sand
or mud dwellers. Since the available
food in such a substrate is at best of a
very low order, inhabitants of these
situations must either seek buried or
trapped food particles or capture food
from the passing waters.
1 If there is no BOD involved, and water
and oxygen circulate down into the
deposit, burrowing forms such as
certain mayflies, annelid worms,
ammocetes lamprey larvae, micro-
crustaceans, and others may burrow
down to depths of two feet or more.
Fish eggs normally deposited in gravel
and newly hatched larvae are also
dependent on circulating water. Such
a population can be killed overnight by
a layer of fine sediment or sludge which
seals the surface to water circulation.
2 Water or plankton feeders include
clams and mussels which can move
about freely in a soft, shifting bottom,
thus keeping on top of silt or sand as
14-6
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
it accumulates. If deposition is
actively taking place, however, there
will probably be so much turbidity in
the water that plankton (food) organisms
are unable to live. Under such cir~
cumstances certain clams and snails
have the ability to close the shell so
tightly by means of valves or an
operculum that all contact is lost with
the environment for extended periods,
during which CO_ tends to lower the
rate of body metabolism. Organisms
of this type have been reported to be
dug up with sand and gravel and
incorporated into concrete products
while still alive. Emergence of a
population of asiatic clams (Corbicula)
for example, just as a big block of
concrete is setting is said to be rough
on contractors!
3 An interesting situation occasionally
develops in estuaries where mud of
moderate organic content is slowly
deposited over oyster beds. The
oysters are unable to move, but as
they grow, their shells tend to bend
upward above the accumulating silt,
and may grow to several inches in
length while growing very little in
width. Crowding brings about a similar
reaction in the effort to avoid being
buried.
Few generalizations can be offered
relative to toxic pollution except that
toxicity is relative, and all forms do not
respond equally to a given toxicant.
1 Few mechanisms of toleration can be
listed, beyond the natural resistance
that certain forms may have for a given
condition. For example, some marine
species may survive a salt concentration
that is toxic to freshwater species.
Over a period of several generations,
some species may develop a genetic
resistance to some toxicant such as
insecticides in the same way that DDT-
resistant strains of houseflies have
developed. Copper sulfate, and chlorine•
resistant strains of algae such as
Cosmarium for example, may develop
in treated water supply reservoirs.
Some bottom in-fauna organisms such
as annelid worms may retreat down
into burrows until a slug of undesirable
water passes.
Molluscs may close shells tightly for
the same purpose. The metabolic
rate is known to diminish with the
increase of CO, inside the closed
shell, thereby enabling them to
remain tightly sealed for extended
periods of time.
VII EFFECTS OF LIFE HISTORY STAGES
A In order to survive in a polluted area,
each life history stage of an indigenous
organism must be able to survive in turn.
B If some given life history stage cannot
tolerate conditions, and the species is
present:
1 Fortuitous changes may occur at the
proper time(s) to permit survival of
the more susceptible stages(s) or:
2 Recruitment from less polluted areas
may occur.
C Some examples of reproductive stages or
procedures which might affect pollution
sensitivity:
1 Egg or egg-like stages are often
enclosed in protective membranes,
jelly masses, or cases. May remain
dormant until favorable conditions
develop.
2 Eggs may be deposited in locations
where they are less exposed to polluted
water as:
buried in the gravel,
on the surface film,
on rocks over the water moistened
by spray,
on mud surface near water,
or in locations where maximum
water circulation is encountered
as at lip of waterfall.
14-7
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
Eggs may require minimal DO due to
low metabolic rate.
Eggs deposited on or in bottom may be
susceptible to smothering.
Newly hatched larvae often continue to
live on stored yolk material for a time.
On beginning to take natural food, they
may be killed by toxic content thereof,
such as organochlorines.
Some forms such as certain sludge
worms commonly reproduce by
(vegetative) fragmentation, hence
avoiding egg and larva stages.
V1H NATURA L SE LECTION A ND
ACCLIMATIZATION TO POLLUTION
A Known biological mechanisms for selective
breeding of pollution resistant strains
operate in nature among fishes as among
other organisms.
1 Studies of population genetics indicate
that after some finite number of gen-
erations of population stress (e.g.,
exposure to a given pollutant),
permanent heritable resistance may be
expected to develop.
2 If the environmental stress (or
pollutant) is removed prior to the time
that permanent resistance is developed
in the population, reversion to the
non-resistant condition may occur within
a relatively few generations.
3 Habitats harboring populations under
stress in this manner are often marked
with the dead bodies of the unsuccessful
individuals.
B Individual organisms on the other hand can
over a period of time (less than one life
cycle) develop a limited ability to tolerate
different conditions, e.g., pollutants:
1 With reference to all categories of
pollutants both relatively facultative
and obligate species are encountered
(e.g., euryhaline vs stenohaline,
eurythermal vs stenothermal).
2 This temporary somatic acclimatization
is not heritable.
C A given single-species collection or
sample of living fishes may therefore
represent one or more types of pollution
resistance:
1 A sample of an original population
which has been acclimated to a given
stress in toto.
2 A sample of the surviving portion of
an originalpopulation, which has been
"selected" by the ability to endure the
stress. The dead fish in a partial fish
kill are that portion of the original
population unable to endure the stress.
3 A sample of a sub-population of the
original species in question which has
in toto over a period of several
generations developed a heritable
stress resistance.
D Any given multi-species field collection
will normally contain species illustrative
of one or more of the conditions outlined
above.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
Certain portions of this outline contain
material from a prior outline by Croswell
Henderson and revisions by R. M. Sinclair.
REFERENCES
1 Cordone, A.J. and Kelley, D.W. The
Influence of Inorganic Sediment on the
Aquatic Life in Streams. Calif. Fish
and Game. 47:189-228. No.2. 1961.
2 Ellis, M.M. Detection and Measurement
of Stream Pollution. Bull. 22, U. S.
Bur. Fish: also. Bull. Burg. Fish 48:
356-437. 1937.
3 Foster, R.F. and Davis, J. J. The
Accumulation of Radioactive Sub-
stances in Aquatic Forms, No. A/Conf.
8/P/280. U.S.A. International Conf.
on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy.
pp. 1-7. 1955.
14-8
-------
Effects of Pollution on Aquatic Life
4 Ingram, W.M. and Towne, W.W.
Stream Life Below Industrial Outfalls.
Public Health Reports. 74:1059-1070.
1959.
5 Kurland, Leonard. The Outbreak of a
Neurologic Disorder in Minimata,
Japan, and its Relationship to the
Ingestion of Seafood Contaminated by
Mercuric Compounds. Proc. Nat.
Shell. Sanlt. Workshop, pp. 226-228.
1961.
6 Mackenthun, K. M. and Keup, L. E.
Assessing Temperature Effects with
Biology. Proc. Am. Power Conf.
Vol. 31. pp. 335-343. 1969.
7 Tarzwell, C. M. and Gaufin, R.R. Some
Important Biological Effects of Pollution
Often Disregarded in Stream Surveys.
Purdue Univ. Engr. Bull. Proceedings
8th Ind. Waste Conf. May 4, 5, and 6,
1953.
8 Tarzwell, C. M. Hazards of Pesticides
to Fishes and the Aquatic Environment.
The Use and Effects of Pesticides.
Proc. of Symposium, Albany, N.Y.
Sept. 23, 1963. N.Y. State Joint
Legis. Comm. on Nat. Resources,
Albany, N.Y. pp. 30-40.
9 Vinson, S. B., Boyd, C.E. and Ferguson,
D. E. Resistance to DDT in the
Mosquito Fish Gambusia affinis Science.
139:217-218. January 18, 1963.
10 Walshe, Barbara M. On the Function of
Hemoglobin in Chironomus after Oxygen
Lack. Jour. Exp. Biol. Cambridge.
124:329-342. 1947.
2 Foster, R.F. and Davis, J.J. Aquatic
Life Water Quality Criteria. Second
Progress Report, Aquatic Life
Advisory Committee, Sewage and
Ind. Wastes, 28:678-690. 1956.
3 Fox, H. Munro. Daphnia Hemoglobin.
Nature. London, p. 431.
September 27, 1947.
4 Ingram, W.M. and Wastler, HI, T.A.
Estuarine and Marine Pollution.
Selected Studies, U. S. DHEW, PHS,
Robt. A. Taft Sanitary Engineering
Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. Technical
Publication No. W6 1-04.
5 Jackson, H.W. and Brungs, Wm. A.
Biomonitoring of Industrial Effluents.
Purdue Industrial Waste Conference,
Layfayette, Indiana. May 3-5, 1966.
6 Rodhe, W. Limnology, Social Welfare,
and Lake Kinneret. Int. Jour.
Limnology, Vol. 17. November 1969.
7 Tennessee Valley Authority, Fish Kill
in Boone Reservoir. TVA Water
Qual. Branch. Chattanooga, Tenn.
1968.
8 Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering
Center. Pesticides in Soil and Water.
An annotated Bibliography. PHS
Publication No. 999-WP-17.
September 1964.
9 Stewart, R. Keith, Ingram, William M.
and Mackenthun, Kenneth. Selected
Biological References on Fresh and
Marine Waters. FWPCA Publication
No. WP-23, pp. 126. 1966.
SUPPLEMENTARY READING
1 Bullock, Glen L. A Schematic Outline for
the Presumptive Identification of
Bacterial Diseases of Fish. Prog. Fish
Cult. 23(4):147-151. 1961.
10 Warren, Charles E.
Pollution Control.
434pp. 1971.
Biology and Water
W.B. Saunders Co.
This outline was prepared by H.W. Jackson,
Chief Biologist, National Training Center,
WPO, EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
14-9
-------
THE EFFECTS OF ORGANISMS ON POLLUTION AND THE ENVIRONMENT
I INTRODUCTION
A Pollution is often studied as a factor
affecting the biota, but it is equally
important to recognize the environmental
changes produced by the biota.
B According to Westlake, under many
conditions "..'.. the environment is almost
as much a product of the community as the
community is of the environment. "
II SOM E ENVIRONM ENTA L EX AMP LE S
A Diatom Blooms
"...Asterionella (an oil storage alga)
produces an autotoxin (autoantibiosis)
which will inhibit itself, may stimulate or
inhibit other species that store oil, but
always stimulate algae that store starch.
For example, Asterionella may produce
a bloom and inhibit itself, but stimulate
a population of Synedra. These oil
storage algae produce a substance that
stimulates a starch-storing alga,
Coelastrum. which may stimulate another
star en-storing organism, Cosmarium, and
they, in turn, stimulate an oil storing
species of Dinobryon. " Patrick.
B The altered structure of the plankton
community due to the introduction of the
alewife
C Fecal deposit feeders in the estuarine
environment
D Particle feeders are successful in the
pipe clogging community and are
generally (Sebestyen):
1 Sessile
2 Suspension feeders
3 Have motile larvae
4 Resistant stages
E Biogeochemical Cycles
In terms of biomass and energy flow, the
mussel Modiolus (Figure 1) is a relatively
minor component of the marsh community.
However, they have been demonstrated to
have a major effect on the recycling and
retention of valuable phosphorus; thereby
maintaining fertility and production of
autotrophs (Odum).
F Sudd (dense aggregations of floating weeds)
Flowering aquatic plants are a serious
problem in shallow, stagnant, or slow-flowing
water in many tropical countries. They are
expensive liabilities in newly impounded
reservoirs in developing nations.
G Biological Pollution
Contamination of living native, biotas by
introduction of exotic life forms has been
called biological pollution by Lachner et al.
Some of these introductions are compared
to contamination as severe as a dangerous
chemical release. They also threaten to
replace known wildlife resources with
species of little or unknown value.
1 Tropical areas have especially been
vulnerable. Florida is referred to as
"a biological cesspool of introduced
life".
2 Invertebrates
a Asian Clams have a pelagic veliger
larvae, thus, a variety of hydro
installations are vulnerable to sub-
sequent pipe clogging by the adult
clams.
b Melanian snails are intermediate
hosts for various trematodes
parasitic on man.
3 Vertebrates
a At least 25 exotic species of fish
have been established in North
America.
b Birds, including starlings and cattle
egrets.
WP.NAP.22d.9.72
14-11
-------
The Effects of Organisms on Pollution and the Environment
c Mammals, including nutria.
4 Aquatic plants
Over twenty common exotic species are
growing wild in the United States. The
problem of waterway clogging has been
especially severe in parts of the
Southeast.
in In polluted environments, there is a more
noticeable change in balance, time response,
and effects.
A Organic Pollution
The conditions here are classic and well
described. There is a succession of
biological communities (Figure 2) each
of which modify the environment and water
properties, thus, the effects are pre-
dominately biological.
1 Tubificidae (aquatic earthworms) in the
first zone may reach as many as
1, 7000, 000/m and move up to 50 tons
of mud per acre per day.
2 In the second zone chironomids (midge
larvae) are found in thousands per
square meter and may reduce the DO
level by one and one-half ppm per
stream mile.
3 The Isopod (sowbug) zone (the genus
Asellus or Lirceus depending on locality)
third in succession also may reach a
density of thousands per square meter,
a further oxygen demand due to
respiration. (Figure 2)
4 The filamentous green alga Cladophora
in both streams and lakes responds to
organic enrichment by producing dense
growths. (Figure 3)
5 Higher aquatic plants such as
Potamogeton pectinatus may also be
involved in these ecological changes
in streams, particularly respiration
vs. photosynthesis. There is correlation
between weed bed growths, velocity and
silt deposition. In some streams these
massive growths on sloughing off foul
water intakes and reduce DO levels as
they decompose.
6 Sphaerotilus and/or slime growths
below organic wastes, by metabolic
demands while living and decomposition
after death, impose a high BOD load
on the stream and can severely deplete
the dissolved oxygen. (Figure 3)
7 Blackflies (Diptera, family Simuliidae)
often reach large populations below
organic waste sources, filter feed on
this material and in so doing, further
degrade stream conditions with their
fecal deposits.
B Inorganic and Toxic Pollution
When progressive changes occur they
are rarely produced by the biological
community.
C Biological Magnification
Biological magnification is an additional
chronic effect of toxic and other pollutants
(such as heavy metals, pesticides,
carcinogens, teratogens, radionuelides,
bacteria, and viruses) which must be
recognized and examined before clearance
can be given for the disposal of a waste
product into natural waters. To para-
phrase Odum we could give nature an
apparently innocuous amount of pollutant
and have her give it back to us in a lethal
or detrimental package.
1 Many animals, and especially bivalves,
have the ability to remove from the
environment and store in their tissues
substances present at nontoxic levels
in the surrounding water.
a This process may continue in the
clam or fish, for example, until
the body burden of the toxicant
reaches such levels that the animal's
death would result if the pollutant
were released into the bloodstream
by physiological activity.
14-12
-------
The Effects of Organisms on Pollution and the Environment
PHOSPHORUS IN WATER
particular* 14 mgm/m'
phosphate 19 "
dissolved organic 6 "
(total '39 mgm/m1
5.5 mgm/m'/day
~" intake
0.3 mgm/m'/doy
recycle
—•- ENERGY FLOW •
flux by Modiolus
amount in environment
MODIOIUS
_ _ _ POPULATION
phosphorus 37 mgm/m1
BIOMASS ' 1 .Sg/m'
. respiration 0.1 kcol/m'doy
~~"^- production 0.05 " " "
energy : : 0.008
(Reproduced from Figure 4-4, from Ecology by Eugene P. Odum,
copyright (c) 1963 by Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. used by
permission of Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Incs)
Figure 1. The role of a shellfish (mussel) population
in the cycling and retention of phosphorus
in an estuarine ecosystem.
Figure 2. linear alterations in populations of Tubificids (A)
Chironomids (B), and Isopods (C) (from Bartsch).
Zone C is often referred to as the Cladophora-
Asellus Zone. '
14-13
-------
The Effects of Organisms on Pollution and the Environment
20 30
Miles
60
Figure 3. Linear alterations in populations of slime growths and Cladophora
(modified from Bartsch)
b This may occur, as in the case of
chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides
(such as DDT and endrin) stored in
fat depots, when the animals food
supply is restricted and the body
fat is mobilized.
c The appearance of the toxicant in
the bloodstream causes the death
of the animal.
The biological magnification and
storage of toxic residues of polluting
substances and microorganisms may
have another serious after effect.
a Herbivorous and carnivorous fish at
lower trophic stages may gradually
build up DDT residues of 15 to 20
mg/1 without apparent ill effect.
b Carnivorous fish, mammals, and
birds preying on these contaminated
fish may be killed immediately or
suffer irreparable damage because
of the pesticide residue or infectious
agent.
c Commercial shellfisheries are
damaged by toxins produced by some
dino-flagellate blooms in nearshore
waters.
IV In summary, the biological causes of DO
changes, associated changes in pH and CO?,
ammonia, nitrates, and sulphides, require
study if the effects of organic pollution are
to be calculated and predicted. Further
biological effects on pollution include the
relation to fouling organisms; stabilization
of sediments in estuaries; recycling of
nutrients; and problems of biological
magnification.
REFERENCES
1 Curtis, E.J. Review Paper. Sewage
Fungus: Its Nature and Effects.
Water Res. 3:289-311. 1969.
2 Herbst, Richard P. Ecological Factors
and the Distribution of Cladophora
glomerata in the Great Lakes. Amer.
Mid. Nat. 82(l):90-98. 1969.
3 Holm, L. G., Weldon, L.W. and Blackburn,
R.D. Aquatic Weeds. Science.
66:699-709. 1969.
4 Odum, E.P. Ecology. Holt, Rinehart,
and Winston. 192pp. 1961.
14-14
-------
The Effects of Organisms on Pollution and the Environment
5 Lachner, Ernest A., Robins, C. Richard,
and Courtenay, Walter R. Jr.
Exotic Fishes and Other Aquatic
Organisms Introduced into North
America Smithsonian Contrib. to
Zool. 59:1-29. 1970.
6 Patrick, Ruth. Water Research Programs
Aquatic Communities. Office Water
Resources, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Washington, D. C. 22 pp. 1968.
7 Sculthorpe, C. D. The Biology of Aquatic
Vascular Plants. St. Martin's Press,
New York. 610pp. 1967.
8 Sebestyen, Olga. On Urnatella gracilis
Leidy (Kamptozoa Cori) and its
occurrence in an industrial waterworks
fed by Danube water in Hungary. Acta
Zool. Acad. Sci. Hungaricae.
8:435-448.
9 Westlake, D.F. The Effects of Orga-
nisms on Pollution. Proc. Linnean
Soc. London. 170 session pt. 2.
p. 171-172. 1959.
10 Westlake, D.F. The Effects of
Biological Communities on Conditions
in Polluted Streams. Symp. No. 8
Inst. of Biol. London (41 Queen's
Gate, London, S.W.T.)p. 25-31. 1959.
11 Whitton, B.A. Review Paper. Biology
of Cladophora in Freshwaters, Water
Research 4:457-476. 1970.
This outline was prepared by Ralph M.
Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist, National
Training Center, Water Programs Operations,
EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45288.
14-15
-------
GLOBAL-DETERIORATION AND OUR ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS
I FROM LOCAL TO REGIONAL TO GLOBAL
PROBLEMS
A Environmental problems do not stop at
national frontiers, or ideological barriers.
Pollution in the atmosphere and oceans
taints all nations, even those benignly
favored by geography, climate, or natural
resources.
1; The smokestacks of one country can
pollute the air and water of another.
2 Toxic effluents poured into an inter-
national river can kill fish in a
neighboring nation and ultimately
pollute international seas.
B In Antarctica, thousands of miles from
pollution sources, penguins and fish
contain DDT in their fat. Recent layers
of snow and ice on the white continent
contain measurable amounts of lead.
The increase can be correlated with the
earliest days of lead smelting' and com-
bustion of leaded gasolines.
C International cooperation, therefore, is
nece.ssary on many environmental fronts.
1 Sudden accidents that chaotically
damage the environment - such as oil
spills from a tanker at sea - require
international cooperation both for
prevention and for cleanup.
2 Environmental effects cannot be
effectively treated by unilateral action.
3 The ocean can no longer be considered
a dump.
D "One of the penalties of an ecological
education is that one lives alone in a
world of wounds. Much of the damage
inflicted on land is quite invisible to
laymen. An ecologist must either harden
his shell and make believe that the conse-
quences of science are none of his business,
or he must be the doctor who sees the marks
BI. ECO. hum. 2e. 10. 73
of death in a community that believes
itself well and does not want to be told
otherwise. " Aldo Leopold
H CHANGES IN ECOSYSTEMS ARE
OCCURRING CONTINUOUSLY
A Myriad interactions take place at every
moment of the day as plants and animals
respond to variations in their surroundings
and to each other. Evolution has produced
for, each species, including .man, a genetic
composition that limits how far that
species can go in adjusting to sudden
changes in its surroundings. But within
these limits the several thousand species
in an ecosystem, or for that matter, the
millions in the biosphere, continuously
adjust to outside stimuli. Since inter-
actions are so numerous, they form long
chains of reactions.
B Small changes in one part of an ecosystem
are likely to be felt and compensated for
eventually throughout the system.
Dramatic examples of change can be seen
where man has altered the course of
nature. It is vividly evident in his well-
intentioned but poorly thought out tampering
with river, lake, and other ecosystems.
1 The Aswan High Dam
2 The St. Lawrence Seaway
3 Lake Kariba
4 The Great Lakes
5 Valley of Mexico
6 California earthquake (Scientific
American 3981, p. 333)
7 Everglades and the Miami, Florida
Jetport
8 Copperhill, Tennessee (Copper Basin)
9 (You may add others)
15-1
-------
jjrlobal Deterioration and Our Environmental Crisis
C Ecosystem Stability
1 The stability of a particular ecosystem
depends on its diversity. The more
interdependencies in an ecosystem, the
greater the chances that it will be able
to compensate for changes imposed
upon it.
2 A cornfield or lawn has little natural
stability. If they are not constantly
and carefully cultivated, they will not
remain cornfields or lawns but will
soon be overgrown with a wide variety
of hardier plants constituting a more
stable ecosystem.
3 The chemical elements that make up
living systems also depend on complex,
diverse sources to prevent cyclic
shortages or oversupply.
4 Similar diversity is essential for the
continued functioning of the cycle by
which atmospheric nitrogen is made
available to allow life to exist. This
cycle depends on a wide variety of
organisms, including soil bacteria and
fungi, which are often destroyed by
pesticides in the soil.
D Biological Pollution
Contamination of living native biotas by
introduction of exotic life forms has been
called biological pollution by Lachner et al.
Some of these introductions are compared
to contamination as severe as a dangerous
chemical release. They also threaten to
replace known wildlife resources with
species of little or unknown value.
1 Tropical areas have especially been
vulnerable. Florida is referred to as
"a biological cesspool of introduced
life".
2 Invertebrates
a Asian Clanis have a pelagic veliger
larvae, thus, a variety of hydro
installations are vulnerable to sub-
sequent pipe clogging by the adult
clams.
b Me Ionian snails are intermediate
hosts for various trematodes
parasitic on man.
3 Vertebrates
a At least 25 exotic species of fish
have been established in North
America.
b Birds, including starlings and
cattle egrets.
c Mammals, including nutria.
4 Aquatic plants
Over twenty common exotic species
are growing wild in the United States.
The problem of waterway clogging has
been especially severe in parts of the
Southeast.
5 Pathogens and Pests
Introduction of insect pests and tree
pathogens have had severe economic
effects.
Ill LAWS OF ECOLOGY
A Four principles have been enunciated by
Dr. Barry Commoner.
1 Everything is connected to everything
else.
2 Everything must go somewhere.
3 Nature knows best.
4 There is no such thing as a free lunch.
B These may be summarized by the principle,
"you can't do just one thing. "
15-2
-------
Global Deterioration and Our Environmental Crisis
IV THE THREE PRINCIPLES OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL (Wolman)
A You can't escape.
B You have to organize.
C You have to pay.
V POLLUTION COMES IN MANY PACKAGES
A The sources of air, water, and land
pollution are interrelated and often
interchangeable.
1 A single source may pollute the air
with smoke and chemicals, the land
with solid wastes, and a river or lake
with chemical and other wastes.
2 Control of air pollution may produce
more solid wastes, which then pollute
the land or water.
3 Control of wastewater effluent may
convert it into solid wastes, which
must be disposed of on land, or by
combustion to the air.
4 Some pollutants - chemicals, radiation,
pesticides - appear in all media.
B "Disposal" is as important and as costly
as purification.
VI PERSISTENT CHEMICALS IN THE
ENVIRONMENT
Increasingly complex manufacturing
processes, coupled with rising industrialization,
create greater amounts of exotic wastes
potentially toxic to humans and aquatic life.
They may also be teratogenic (toxicants
responsible for changes in the embryo with
resulting birth defects, ex., thalidomide),
mutagenic (insults which produce mutations,
ex., radiation), or carcinogenic (insults
which induce cancer, ex., benzbpyrenes)
in effect.
A Metals - current levels of cadmium, lead,
and other substances whose effects on
humans and fish and wildlife are not fully
understood constitute a mounting concern.
Mercury pollution, for example, has
become a serious national problem, yet
mercury has been present on earth since
time immemorial. More research is
needed, yet we dare not relax our
standards until definitive answers have
been provided.
B Pesticides
1 A pesticide and its metabolites may
move through an ecosystem in many
ways. Hard (pesticides which are
persistent, having a long half-life in
the environment includes the organo-
chlorines, ex., DDT) pesticides
ingested or otherwise borne by the
target species will stay in the
environment, possibly to be recycled
or concentrated further through the
natural action of food chains if the
species is eaten. Most of the volume
of pesticides do not reach their target
at all.
2 Biological magnification
Initially, low levels of persistent
pesticides in air, soil, and water
may be concentrated at every step
up the food chain. Minute aquatic
organisms and scavengers, which
screen water and bottom mud having
pesticide levels of a few parts per
billion, can accumulate levels
measured in parts per million -
a thousandfold increase. The sediments
including fecal deposits are continuously
recycled by the bottom animals.
a Oysters, for instance, will con-
centrate DDT 70, 000 times higher
in their tissues than it's concentration
in surrounding water. They can
also partially cleanse themselves
in water free of DDT.
15-3
-------
Global Deterioration and Our Environmental Crisis
Fish feeding on lower organisms
build up concentrations in their
visceral fat which may reach several
thousand parts per million and levels
in their edible flesh of hundreds of
parts per million.
Larger animals, such as fish-eating
gulls and other birds, can further
concentrate the chemicals. A survey E
on organochlorine residues in aquatic
birds in the Canadian prairie provinces
showed that California and ring-billed
gulls were among the most con- 2
taminated. Since gulls breed in
colonies, breeding population changes VIE SUMMARY
can be detected and related to levels
of chemical contamination. Ecological
research on colonial birds to monitor
the effects of chemical pollution on
the environment is useful.
great influence on previously unpolluted
waters and their life.
C Minimata, Japan and mercury pollution.
D Organochlorine levels in commercial and
sport fishing stocks, ex., the lower
Mississippi River fish kills.
You may complete the following:
1
C "Polychlorinated biphenyls" (PCB's).
PCB's are used in plasticizers, asphalt,
ink, paper, and a host of other products.
Action has been taken to curtail their
release to the environment, since their
effects are similar to hard pesticides.
D Other compounds which are toxic and
accumulate in the ecosystem:
1 Phalate esters - may interfere with
pesticide analyses
2 Benzophyrenes
3
VII EXAMPLES OF SOME EARLY WARNING
SIGNALS THAT HAVE BEEN DETECTED
BUT FORGOTTEN, OR IGNORED.
A Magnetic micro-spherules in lake
sediments now used to detect changes
in industrialization indicate our slowness
to recognize indicators of environmental
change.
B Salmonid fish kills in poorly buffered
clean lakes in Sweden. Over the past
years there had been a successive
increase of SO, in the air and precipitation.
Thus, air-borne contamination from
industrialized European countries had a
Ecosystems of the world are linked
together through biogeochemical cycles
which are determined by patterns of
transfer and concentrations of substances
in the biosphere and surface rocks.
B Organisms determine or strongly
influence chemical and physical charac-
teristics of the atmosphere, soil, and
waters.
C The Inability of man to adequately predict
or control his effects on the environment
is indicated by his lack of knowledge
concerning the net effect of atmospheric
pollution on the earth's climate.
D Serious potential hazards for man which
are all globally dispersed, are radionuclides,
organic chemicals, pesticides, and
combustion products.
E Environmental destruction is in lock-step
with our population growth.
A CKNOWLEDGEMENT:
This outline has been extracted in part from
the first annual report of the Council on
Environmental Quality: Environmental
Quality. USGPO, Washington, DC.
326 pp. $1.75. 1970.
REFERENCES
1 Goldman, Charles R. Is the Canary Dying?
The time has come for man, miner of
the worlds resources, to surface. Calif.
Medicine 113:21-26. 1970.
15-4
-------
Global Deterioration and Our Environmental Crisis
2 Lachner, Ernest A., Robins, C. Richard,
and Courtenay, Walter R., Jr.
Exotic Fishes and Other Aquatic
Organisms Introduced into North
America. Smithsonian Contrib. to
Zool. 59:1-29. 1970.
3 Nriagu, Jerome O. and Bowser, Carl J.
The Magnetic Spherules in Sediments
of Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Water
Res. 3:833-842. 1969.
Hood, Donald W.
on the Oceans.
738 p. 1971.
ed. Impingement of Man
Wiley-Inter science.
5 Commoner, Barry. The Closing Circle,
Nature, Man, and Technology. Alfred
A. Knopf. 326 p. 1971.
6 Dansereau, Pierre ed. Challenge for
Survival. Land, Air, and Water for
Man in Megalopolis, Columbia Univ.
Press. 235 p. 1970.
7 Wiens, John A. ed. Ecosystem Structure
and Function. Oregon State Univ.
Press. 176 p. 1972.
8 Matthews, W. H., Smith, F. E., and
Goldberg, E. D. Man's Impact on
Terrestrial and Oceanic Ecosystems.
MIT Press. 1971.
9 Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac
with Essays on Conservation from
Round River. Sierra Club/Ballantine
Books. 295 p. 1970.
10 Sondheimer, Ernest B. and Simeone,
John B. Chemical Ecology. Academic
Press. 336 p. 1970.
11 Environmental Quality. Second Annual
Report of the Council on Environmental
Quality. August 1971. Fourth Annual
Report 1973.
12 Toxic Substances. Council on
Environmental Quality. 25 p.
April 1971.
13 Zinc in Water. A Bibliography USDI.
Office Water Resources WRSIC Series
208. 1971. Also in this series WRSIC
201-207, Mercury, Magnesium,
Manganese, Copper, Trace Elements,
and Strontium.
14 The Changing Chemistry of the Oceans;
Proc. 20th Nobel Symposium.
Wiley. 1972.
15 Bradley, Michael D. Human, Ecology
and Coastal-Zone Pollution. Water,
Air, and Soil Pollution. 1(4): 405-414.
1972.
16 Thomas, William A., Indicators of
Environmental Quality. Plenum Press.
275 p. 1972.
17 Cowell, E. B. "Oil Pollution in perspec-
tive", in The Ecological Effects of Oil
Pollution on Littoral Communities.
Inst. of Petroleum. Appl. Sci. Pub.
1972. (Includes a pollution rating
scale).
18 Oglesby, RayT., Carlson, Clarence A.,
and McCann, James A. River Ecology
and Man. Academic Press. 465 p. 1972.
This outline was prepared by Ralph M.
Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist, National
Training Center, Water Program Operations,
EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
15-5
-------
FUNDAMENTALS OF THE TOXICITY BIOASSAY
I INTRODUCTION
A The toxicity bioassay procedure herein
discussed is intended for use by indus-
trial and other laboratories.
B Its objective is to evaluate the toxicity
of wastes and other water pollutants to
fish or other aquatic organisms.
C This basic procedure evaluates relatively
acute toxicity only (chronic or cumulative
toxicity requires more extensive study).
D Potential applications are numerous.
1 Dilution and/or treatment necessary
to avoid acute toxic effects can be
estimated.
2 The efficacy of a treatment can be
tested.
3 The potential usefulness of a proposed
treatment can be estimated.
E The toxicity bioassay technique does not
involve a chemical knowledge of the
toxicant.
1 Synergism, antagonism, and other
interactions of chemical components
cannot always be anticipated, but are
automatically included in the overall
evaluation.
2 All chemical and physical information
available is essential to the adequate
interpretation and application of test
results.
F The test is designed for local application.
Generalizations should be made with
great caution.
G Field observations should be made of
results of application over a significant
period of time.
H Careful distinction should be made
between fish mortality due to a phys-
iological toxicant, and that due to lack
of DO.
I A uniform testing procedure is essential
to effective action in water pollution
control.
ROUTINE PROCEDURE
A Test animals should be fish or other
organisms of local significance.
1 Extremely resistant or extremely
sensitive species should not be
selected.
2 They should be' species which are
amenable to captivity.
3 They should be accurately identified.
4 They should be relatively uniform in
size. Individuals less than 3 inches
in length are usually most convenient.
5 They should be healthy and thoroughly
acclimated to the laboratory.
B Test water should preferably be taken
from the receiving stream just above
the discharge being evaluated.
1 If this is unsuitable, cleaner waters
from an upstream station may be
substituted.
2 Artificial "standard" waters are not
recommended for general use.
C Other Experimental Conditions
BI. BIO. met. 7c. 10.69
16-1
-------
Fundamentals of the Toxicity Bioassay
1 Temperature
The tests should be performed at a
uniform temperature in the upper part
of the expected summer range, e.g.,
200 - 250C for warm water fish, and
120 - iso c for cold water species.
It has been found however, that for
most routine operations', ambient
laboratory temperatures are satisfactory.
Standard modern air conditioning,
particularly if it is maintained 24 hours
a day, is quite adequate.
2 Test containers should be of glass.
Wide mouthed "pickle jugs" or battery
jars are satisfactory. Five and one
gallon sizes are both useful, but the
larger size is required for conclusive
results.
3 Artificial Aeration should not be used
to maintain the dissolved oxygen
concentration. If this falls below
approximately 4 or 5 ppm at any time
during the test, fewer fish should be
used per container or an auxiliary
oxygenation procedure invoked that is
designed to void undue loss of volatile
toxicants.
4 The number of test animals should not
be less than 10 per concentration for
reliable conclusions; these may be
distributed between two or more
containers.
5 Ratio of fish to solution
There should be less than 2 grams of
fish per liter of test solution,
preferably not more than one.
D Experimental Procedure
1 All dilutions for a given run should be
prepared from the same sample.
2 Control tests are essential.
4 Dead fish should be removed as soon
as observed. Survivors should be
counted and recorded each 24 hours.
5 Feeding during the test should be
avoided.
6 Experimental concentrations
Any appropriate concentrations may
be used. A logarithmic series such
as is suggested in Table I is very
convenient.. Concentrations can be
expressed in percent by volume,
parts per million by weight, or other
appropriate units.
7 Expression of results
The measure of relative toxicity is
the median tolerance limit (symbol:
TL , this is the analogue of the
LD™ of the ioxicologist).
5U
. a This is the concentration which
just 50% of the test animals can
survive for a stipulated period of
time (sometimes written TL*
where t « 24, 48, 96 hours, ePc.)
b The TL may conveniently be
estimatea graphically, by plotting
the experimental data on semi-
logarithmic graph paper, with the
test concentration laid off on the
log, scale, and the percent
survival on the arithmetic scale.
Connect with a straight line the
two successive data points
representing survival values of
greater than and less than 50%.
Note the concentration which
corresponds to 50% survival on
this graph. This is the "TL* ".
Other methods are acceptable?
Ill REPORTING, INTERPRETATION AND
APPLICATION
3 Duration
Tests should be run for at least 48 hours,
preferably 96.
A Reports should include an orderly
tabulation of all pertinent data such as:
1 Identity of experimental animals
16-2
-------
Fundamentals of the Toxicity Bioassay
2 Their source, average size and
condition, and number used per
concentration
3 Source and chemical and physical
analysis of experimental water
4 Experimental temperature
5 Volumes of experimental liquid in
each container
6 Records of running analyses such as
DO and pH
7 TL and data from which it was
determined
B Interpretation and application will be
discussed more thoroughly later.
Briefly:
2 The problem is to extrapolate from
this well established mid concentration
to a safe concentration well below the
"critical concentration range".
3 Initiation of regulatory procedures
based on the TL should be followed
by periodic fieldobservations. If
aquatic life flourishes, there is no
problem indicated. If not, the
material must be still further diluted.
IV SPECIAL PROBLEMS
A Unaerated aquaria with finite quantities
of toxicant are not always satisfactory
(Static Tests).
1 The toxicant may be volatile.
2 Toxic materials may be masked by
a high BOD.
3 The toxicant may be progressively
adsorbed or otherwise changed.
1 The TL is an estimate of the midpoint
of the critical concentration range
(the interval between the highest
concentration at which all test animals
survive, and the lowest at which they
all die).
TABLE I
A Guide to the Selection of Experimental Concentrations,
Based on Progressive Bisection of Intervals on a
Logarithmic Scale.
Col. 1 Col. 2
10.0
3.2
Col. 3
5.6
1.8
Col. 4
7.5
4.2
2.4
1.35
Col. 5
8.7
6.5
4.9
3.7
2; 8
2.1
1.55
1.15
1.0
16-3
-------
Fundamentals of the Toxicity Bioasaay
B Standards or requirements other than
those involving toxicity per se may be
involved.
C Preliminary and Concurrent Investigations
1 Obtain all available information about
unknown to be tested.
2 Does the material lend itself to this
type of test?
3 Run feasible on the spot analyses
including DO.
4 Significant quantities of solutions
removed from test containers for
analysis should be replaced with
similar volume of same dilution.
D Wastes with a high BOD or COD
1 Suggested preliminary tests
a Set up two identical exploratory
tests.
b Aerate one but not the other.
c If great difference develops
between them, special procedures
are indicated.
2 Oxygenation or aeration of dilution
water before making dilutions may
help.
3 Oxygenation of experimental containers
during run. Pure oxygen is suggested
instead of air in order to avoid the
bubbling any more gas through the
containers than is necessary as some
of the toxic fraction may be volatile
materials which would be stripped out.
a Lead oxygen into tank through glass
tube instead of breaker stone in
order to keep bubbles large.
b Control rate of bubbling. Keep it
at the minimum number of
bubbles per minute which will
maintain 4 to 5 milligrams' of
oxygen per liter. Do not attempt
saturation.
c Other systems of Oxygenation are
available.
4 Renewal of solutions at stated inter-
vals (12, 24, or 48 hours) is approved.
Fish are not harmed by being
carefully transferred from one
container to another. It is useful
where:
a Initial DO is adequate but slowly
exhausted.
b Toxicant is volatile, progressively
adsorbed, precipitated, or other-
wise changed.
E Continuous flow apparatus is highly
desirable but expensive.
1 Equipment more involved and subject
to failure during a run.
2 May be adapted to monitoring by use
of proportioning equipment. Makes
longer runs possible.
F Other Considerations
1 Radioactive wastes must be evaluated
in regard to their chemical toxicity
as well as their radioactivity.
2 Sub acute levels of many toxicants
such as lead, arsenic, chromium,
etc., may exert a low level chronic
toxicity over a long period of time.
3 "Safe levels" of a waste in regard to
toxicity may still exceed standards
of other types such as color, organic
content, suspended solids, etc.
16-4
-------
Fundamentals of the Toxicity Bioassay
REFERENCES
1 American Public Health Association,
Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater, 12th edition.
New York. 1965.
2 Doudoroff, P., et al. Bio-As say
Methods for the Evaluation of Acute
Toxicity of Industrial Wastes to Fish,
Sew. andlnd. Wastes, Vol. 23, No. 11.
November 1951.
3 Doudoroff, P. and Katz, M. Critical
Review of Literature on the Toxicity
of Industrial Wastes and Their
Components to Fish. I. Alkalies,
Acids and Inorganic Gases, Sew. and
Ind. Wastes, Vol. 22, No. 11, 1432.
November 1950.
4 Ellis, M.M., Westfall, B.A. and
Ellis, M.D. Determination of
Water Quality, Research Report 9,
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
122 pp. 1946.
5 Hart, W.B., Doudoroff, P. and
Greenbank, J. The Evaluation of the
Toxicity of Industrial Wastes,
Chemicals and Other Substances to
Fresh-Water Fishes. The Atlantic
Refining Company, Philadelphia, Pa.
317 pp.
6 Hart, W.B., Weston, R.F. and
DeMann, J. F. An Apparatus for
Oxygenating Test Solutions in Which
Fish are Used as Test Animals for
Evaluating Toxicity. Trans. Am.
Fisheries Soc. 1945, 75, 228 pub.
1948.
This outline was prepared by H. W. Jackson,
Chief Biologist, National Training Center,
Water Programs Operations, EPAi'
Cincinnati, OH 45288.
16-5
-------
BIOLOGICAL FIELD METHODS
I INTRODUCTION
A Due to the nature of ecological inter-
relationships, methods for the collection
of different types of aquatic organisms
differ. In general we can recognize
those that swim or float and those that
crawl, those that are big and those that
are little. Each comprises & part of
"the life" at any given survey station
and consequently a "complete" collection
would include all types.
B Field methods in the following outline
are grouped under four general
categories, the collection of:
1 Benthos (or bottom dwelling
organisms). These may be
attached, crawling, or burrowing
forms.
2 Plankton (plancton). These are all
of the microscopic plants and
animals normally swimming or
suspended in the open water.
3 Periphyton or "aufwuchs". This is
the community of organisms
associated with the surfaces of
objects. Some are attached, some
crawl. The group is intermediate
between the benthos and the plankton.
4 Nekton. Nekton are the larger,
free swimming active animals such
as shrimp or fishes.
C Aquatic mammals and birds. In most
cases, require still other approaches
and are not included.
D There is little basic difference between
biological methods for oceanic,
estuarine, or freshwater situations
except those dictated by the physical
nature of the environments and the
relative sizes of the organisms.
Fish, benthos, and plankton collection
is essentially the same whether con-
ducted in Lake Michigan, Jones'
Beach, or the Sargasso Sea.
1 Marine organisms range to larger
sizes, and the corrosive nature of
seawater dictates special care in
the design and maintenance of
marine equipment. Site selection
and collection schedules are
influenced by such factors as tidal
currents and periodicity, and
salinity distribution, rather than
(river) currents, riffles, and pools.
2 Freshwater organisms are in
general smaller, and the water is
seldom chemically corrosive on
equipment. Site selection in
streams involves riffles, falls,
pools, etc., and a unidirectional
flow pattern. Lake collection may
involve less predictable strati-
fication or flow patterns.
Definite objectives should be established
in advance as to the size range of
organisms to be collected and counted.
i.e.: microscopic only, microscopic
and macroscopic, those retained by
"30 mesh" screens, invertebrates and/
or vertebrates, etc.
STANDARD PROCEDURES
Certain standard supplementary
procedures are a part of all field
techniques. In order to be interpreted
and used, every collection must be
associated with a record of environ-
mental conditions at the time of
collection.
1 Data recorded should include the
following as far as practicable.
Location (name of river, lake, etc.)
BI. MET. fm.le. 1.74
17-1
-------
Biological Field Methods
Station number (particular location
of which a full description should
be on record)
Date and hour
Air temperature
Water temperature (at various
depths, if applicable)
Salinity (at various depths, if
applicable)
Tidal flow (ebb or flood)
Turbidity (or light penetration, etc. j
Weather
Wind direction and velocity
Sky or cloud cover
Water color
Depth
Type of bottom
Type of collecting device and
accessories
Method of collecting
Type of sample (quantitative or
qualitative)
Number of samples at each station
Chemical and physical data, e.g.,
dissolved oxygen, nutrients, pH,
etc.
Collector's name
Miscellaneous observations (often
very important)
2 All collecting containers should be'
identified at least with location,
station number, sample number, '
and.date. Spares are very handy.
IV
3 ' Much transcription of data can be
eliminated by using sheets or cards
with a uniform arrangement for
including the above data. The
same field data sheet may include
field or laboratory analysis.
Compact kits of field collecting equip-
ment and materials greatly increase
collecting efficiency, especially if
collection site is remote from
transportation.
PERSONA L OBSERVA TION A ND
PHOTOGRAPHY
Direct or indirect observation of under-
water conditions has become relatively
efficient.
1 Diving spheres, pioneered by
William Beebe, Cousteau, Honot,
Willm, and Manad are proving
very important for deep water
observations.
2 Use of the aqualung permits direct
personal study down to over
200 feet.
3 Underwater television (introduced
by the.British Admiralty for
military purposes) is now generally
available for biological and other
observations.
4 Underwater photography is
improving in quality and facility.
5 Underwater swimming or use of i
SCUBA is quite valuable for direct
observation and collecting. :
COLLECTION OF BOTTOM OR
BENTHIC ORGANISMS '
i
Shoreline or Wading Depth Collecting
Plates I, II
1 Hand picking of small forms
attached to or crawling on rocks,
sticks, etc. when lifted out of the
17-2
-------
Biological Field Methods
BOTTOM GRABS
open closed
Ekman
Shipek
Petersen
PLATE I
17-3
-------
Biological Field Methods
LIMNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT
Hand Screen
Surber Sampler
Apron net
Sorting pan
Specimen or
reagent bottles
Pail
PLATE II
17-4
-------
Biological Field Methods
water is a fundamental and much
used method for quickly assaying
what is present and what may be
expected on further search.
Patches of seaweed and eelgrass
and shallow weedy margins any-
where are usually studied on a
qualitative basis only.
a The apron net is one of the best
tools for animals in weed beds
or other heavy vegetation. It
is essentially a pointed wire
sieve on a long handle with
coarse screening over the top
to keep out leaves and sticks.
b Grapple hooks or a rake may
be used to pull masses of
vegetation out on the bank
where the fauna may be
examined and collected as they
crawl out.
c Quantitative estimates of both,
plants and animals can be made
with a "stove pipe" sampler ;
which is forced down through •
a weed mass in shallow water
and embedded in the bottom. '
Entire contents can then be
bailed out into a sieve and
sorted.
d A frame of known dimensions
may be placed over an area to;
be sampled and the material .
within cropped out. This is
especially good for larger
plants and large bivalves.
This .method yields quantitative
data.
Sand and mud flats in estuaries and
shallow lakes may be sampled
quantitatively by marking off a
desired area and either digging
away surrounding material or
excavating the desired material
to a measured depth. Handle-
operated samplers recently
developed by Jackson and
B.
Larrimore, make for more
effective sampling of a variety
of bottoms down to the depth of
the handles. Such samples are
then washed through graded
screens to retrieve the organisms.
4 Ekman grabs are most useful on
soft bottoms. This is a completely
closing clamshell type grab with
spring operated jaws. Size of grab
is usually 6" X6" or 9" X9". the
12" X12" size is impractical due
to its heavy weight when filled with
. bottom material.
For use in shallow water, it is
convenient to rig an Ekman with .
a handle and a hand operated jaw-
release mechanism.
5 The Petersen type grab (described
below) without weights will take :
satisfactory samples in firm muds,
but tends to bury itself'in very
soft bottoms. It is seldom used iri
shallow water except as noted
below.
Collecting in Freshwater Riffles or ;
Rapids '
1 The riffle is one of the most
satisfactory habitats for comparing
stream conditions at different
points. !
2 The hand screen is the simplest
and easiest device to use in this
situation. Resulting collections '
are qualitative only.
a In use the screen is firmly ',
planted in the stream bed. i
Upstream bottom is thoroughly
disturbed with the feet, or ;
worked over by hand by j
another person. Organisms i
dislodged are carried down
into the screen. J
b Screen is then lifted and
dumped into sorting tray or
collecting jar.
17-5
-------
Biological Field Methods
The well-known square foot Surber
sampler is one of the best quan-
titative collecting devices for
riffles.
a It consists of a frame one foot
square with a conical net
attached. It is usable only in
moving water.
b In use it is firmly planted on
the bottom. The bottom stones
and gravel within the square
frame are then carefully gone
over by hand to ensure that all
organisms have been dislodged
and carried by the current into
the net. A stiff vegetable
brush is often useful in this
regard.
c From three to five square-foot
samples should be taken at each
station to insure that a reason-
able percentage of the species
present will be represented.
The Petersen type grab may be used
in deep swift riffles or where the
Surber is unsuitable.
a It is planted by hand on the
bottom, and worked down into'
the bottom with the feet.
b It is then closed and lifted by
pulling on the rope in the usual
manner.
A strong medium weight dipnet is ,
the closest approach to a universal
collecting tool I
a Sweeping Weed beds and Stream
Margins
This is used with a sweeping motion,
through weeds, over the bottoms or
in.open water. A triangular shape
is preferred by some.
b Stop net or Kicking Technique
This may be used as a roughly quan-
titative device in riffles by holding the
end flat against the bottom and
backing slowly up-stream
disturbing the substrate with
•one's feet. A standard period
of time is used.
c The handle should be from 4
to 6 feet long, and about'the
weight of a garden rake
handle.
d The ring should be made of
steel or spring brass, and
securely fastened to the
handle. It'should be strong
but not cumbersome; size of
ring stock will depend on :
diameter of ring.
e The bag or net should be the
strongest available, not over :
1/8 inch mesh, preferably '
about 1/16 inch. Avoid 30 ori
more meshes to the inch; this;
is so fine that the net plugs too
easily and is slow and heavy ;
to handle. |
f There should be a wide canvai
apron sewed around the rim !
and protecting the bag. The !
rim may be protected with '
leather if desired. |
i
D Deep Water Benthic Collecting Plate III
|
1 When sampling from vessels, a
crane and winch, either hand or i
» power operated, is used. The :
general ideas described for shallojw
waters apply also to deeper waters,
when practicable. i
i
2 The Petersen type grab, seems toj
be the best all around sampler fort
the greatest variety of bottoms at j
all depths, from shoreline down to
over 10, 000 meters. (Plate I) i
It consists of two heavily
constructed half cylinders
closed together by a strong
lever action.
17-6
-------
Biological Field Methods
DEEP WATER EQUIPMENT
Bathythermograph
Biological dredge
PLATE III
17-7
-------
Biological Field Methods
b To enable them to bite into
hard bottoms, or to be used in
strong currents, weights may
be attached to bring the total
weight up to between 50 and
iOO Ibs.
c Areas sampled range from
— I/5th to I/20th square naeters
(1/10 square meter equals
approximately 1.1 square ft.)
d A Petersen grab to be hauled
by hand should be fitted with
5/8 or 3/4 inch diameter twisted
rope in order to provide
adequate hand grip. It is best
handled by means of wire ropes
and a winch.
Other bottom samplers include the
VanVeen, Lee, Holme, Smith-
Mclntyre, Knudsen, Ponar, and •
others.
A spring loaded sampler has
recently been developed by Shipek
for use on all types of bottoms. !
It takes a half-cylinder sample,
I/25th square meters in area and. '
approximately 4 inches deep at the
center. The device is automatically
triggered on contact with the •
bottom, and the sample is com- :
pletely protected enroute to the [
surface. (Plate I) '
I
Drag dredges or scrapes are often!
used in marine waters and deeper i
lakes and streams, and comprise j
the basic equipment of several types
of commercial fisheries. Some i
types have been developed for ',
shallow streams. In general !
however, they have been little used
in fresh water. '
The above is only a partial listing j
of the many sampling devices i
available. Others that are often I
encountered are the orange-peel I
bucket, plow dredge, scallop type j
dredge, hydraulic dredges, and j
various coring devices. Each has !
its own advantages and dis-
advantages and it is up to the
worker and his operation to decide
what is best for his particular needs.
The Petersen type and Ekman grabs
are perhaps the most commonly
used.
7 Traps of many types are used for
various benthic organisms,
especially crabs and lobsters.
Artificial substrates (below) are in
essence a type of trap.
8 Since most biological communities
are not evenly distributed, it is
advisable to routinely take at least
two and preferably more samples
from any one station.
Artificial substrates rely on the
ecological predilection of organisms
to grow wherever they find a suitable j
habitat. When a small portion of i
artificial habitat is provided, it tends ;
to become populated by all available j
species partial to that type of situation*
The collector can then at will remove \
the habitat or trap to his laboratory anii
study the population at leisure. !
This versatile research technique is '.
much used for both routine monitoring;
and exploratory studies of pollution. ;
It is also exploited commercially, j
especially for shellfish production. '
Types of materials used include: i
1 Cement plates and panels. j
2 Wood (especially for burrowing j
forms). • :
!
3 Glass slides (ex: Catherwood i
diatometer). . ' j
4 Multiple plate trap (masonite).
' •'• • j
5 Baskets (or other containers) holding
natural bottom material and either!
imbedded in the bottom, or sus- :
pended in the overlying water. !
17-8
-------
Biological Field Methods
6 Unadorned ropes suspended in the
water, or sticks thrust into the
bottom.
F Sorting and Preservation of Collections
1 Benthic collections usually consist
of a great mass of mud and other
debris among which the organisms :
are hidden. Various procedures
may be followed to separate the '
organisms.
a The organisms may be picked :
out on the spot by hand or the
entire mess taken into the •
laboratory where it can be i
examined more efficiently
(especially 'in rough weather). !
Roughly equivalent time will
probably be required in either
case.
b Specimens may be limply ;
observed and recorded or they !
may be preserved as a
permanent record. i
c Organisms may be simply ' j
counted, weighed, or measured j
volumetrically; or they may be
separated and recorded in : <
groups or species. ! '
If separation is in the field, this
usually done by hand picking,
screening, or some type of flotati
process.
i
I
Hand picking is best done on a
white enameled tray using
light tough limnological forceps.
Screening is one of the most
practical methods to separate
organisms from debris in the
field. Some prefer to use a
single fine screen, others
prefer a series of 2 or 3
screens of graded sizes. The
collection may be dumped
directly on the screen and the j
.mud and debris washed through.
or it may be dumped into a
bucket or small tub. Water
is then added, the mixture is
well stirred, and the super-
natant poured through the
screen. The residue is then
examined for heavy forms that
will not float up.
c A variation of this method in
situations where there is no
mud is to pour a strong sugar
or salt solution over the
collection in the bucket, stir ;
it well, and again pour the
supernatant through the screen.
This time, however, saving
the flotation solution for
re-use. The heavier-than-
water solution accentuates the
separation of organisms from
the debris (except for the
heavy shelled molluscs, etc. )j.
A solution of 2-1/2 Ibs. of
sugar per gallon of water is |
considered to be optimum.
Preservation or stabilization is j
usually necessary in the field. i
a 95% ethanol (ethyl alcohol) is
highly satisfactory. A final i
strength of 70% is necessary i
for prolonged storage. If the.
collection is drained of water j
and flooded with 95% ethanol j
in the field, a laboratory i
flotation separation can usually
be made later, thus saving
much time. Considerable
quantities of ethanol are j
required for this procedure, j
I
b Formaldehyde is more widely)
available and is effective in j
concentrations of 3 - 10% of j
the commercial formulation, j
However, it shrinks and i
hardens specimens, collector],
and laboratory analyst without
•favor! In order to minimize !
bad effects from formalin, <
neutralized formalin is i
17-9
-------
Biological Field Methods
recommended. Mollusc shells
will eventually disintegrate in
acid formalin
Properly preserved benthos
samples may be retained
indefinitely, thereby enhancing
their utility.
Refrigeration or icing is very
helpful.
V MICROFAUNA AND PERIPHYTON
(OR AUFWUCHS) SAMPLING
A This is a relatively new area which j
promises to be of great importance. i
The microfauna of mud and sand
bottoms may be studied to some extent
from collections made with the various
devices mentioned above. In most
cases however, there is considerable
loss of the smaller forms.
B Most special microfauna samplers for
soft bottoms are essentially modified
core samplers in which an effort is
made to bring up an undisturbed portion
of the bottom along with the immediately
overlying water. The best type currently
seems to be the Enequist sampler which
weighs some 35 kg. and takes a 100 sq,
cm sample 50 cm. deep.
C Microfauna from the surface of hard ;
sand or gravel bottoms may be sampled
by the Hunt vacuum sampler. This had
a bell-shaped "sampling" tube sealed !
by glass diaphragm. On contact with i
the bottom, the glass is automatically i
broken and the nearly bottom material j
is swept up into a trap. j
D Periphyton attached to or associated '
with hard surfaces such as rock or
wood may be sampled by scraping or
otherwise removing all surface ;
material from a measured area. The j
periphyton, however, is more effectively
quantitatively sampled by artificial j
substrate techniques described above.
VI - THE.COLLECTION. OR SAMPLING
OF PLANKTON PLATE IV
, A Phytoplankton: A Planned,Program is
Desirable
1 A planned program of plankton
analysis should involve periodic
sampling at weekly or even more
frequent intervals.
2 A well-planned study or analysis
of the growth pattern of plankton
in one year will provide a basis
for predicting conditions the
following year since seasonal ;
; growth patterns tend to repeat
themselves from year to year.
: a Since the seasons and the years
; • differ, records accumulated
: over the years become more
I useful.
b As the time for an anticipated
bloom of some troublesome
i species approaches, the
i frequency of analyses may be
; increased.
3 Detection of a bloom in its early
: stages will facilitate more
i economical control.
i B Field Aspects of the. Analysis Program
Two general aspects of plankton i
analysis are commonly recognized:
quantitative and qualitative.
a Qualitative examination tells
what is present.
b Quantitative tells how much.
c Either approach is useful, a
combination is best.
Equipment for collecting samples
in the field is varied.
a A half-liter bottle will serve j
for surface samples of j
phytoplankton, if carefully j
17-10
-------
Biological Field Methods
PLANKTON SAMPLERS
Wisconsin net
Kemmerer
High speed plankton sampler
PLATE IV
17-11
-------
Biological Field Methods
b A Kemrrierer, Nansen, or
other special sampler (small"
battery operated pumps are
time saving) is suggested for
depth samples.
c Plankton nets concentrate the
sample in the act of collecting
and also capture certain larger
forms which escape from the
bottles. Only the more .]
elaborate types are quantitative
however. For phytoplankton,
#20 or #25 size nets are
commonly used. Usually a net
diameter of 5 - 10 inches is
sufficient. The smaller forms !
However, are lost through any
net.
C Zooplankton Collecting
!
1 Since zooplanktpn have the ability
to swim away from water bottles, . j
etc. nets towed at moderately fast '<
speed are used for their capture. '
Number 12 nets (aperature ! j
size 0.119 mm, 125 meshes 1 inch)
or smaller numbered net sizes-are <
commonly used. A net diameter . \
greater than 5" is preferred.
!
Frequently half meter nets or
larger are employed. These may
be equipped with flow measuring ; i
devices for measuring the amount!
of water entering the net. ,
2 Other instruments such as the >
Clark-Bumpus, Gulf-Stream, ; j
Hardy continuous plankton recorder, !
and high-speed instruments are , ,
used for collecting zooplankton, also, i
3 The devices used for collecting j
plankton capture both the plant and '
animal types. The mesh size ;
(net no.) is a method for selecting! j
which category of plankton is to be!
collected. ,
! i
D The Location of Sampling Points '
i t
1 Both shallow and deep samples ard ''•
suggested. J
4.
5.
6.
Shallow" samples should be
taken at a depth of 6 inches to
one foot. The surface film is
often significant.
b "Deep" samples should be
taken at such intervals
between surface and bottom
as circumstances dictate.
In general, the entire water
column should be sampled as
completely as practicable,
and the plankton from each
level recorded separately.
For estuarine plankton, it is ;
necessary to sample different
periods in the stage of the tide, !
otherwise samples would be biased
to a given time, or type of water i
carried by the tidal currents. |
i
Plankton is subjected to the force ,
of the winds and currents. Asa ;
result, the plankton is often in \
patches or "wind rows," (Langmuir
cells). For this reason when using
a net, it is often desirable to tow :
the net at right angles to the wind br
current.
f
Nearly all plankton are horizontally
discontinuous. Planktonic organisms
tertd to be numerous near the bottom
in daylight, but distributed more
evenly through the water column at
night. Therefore, a series of tows
or samples at different depths is
necessary to obtain a complete
sampling. One technique often em-
ployed is to take an oblique tow
from the bottom to the top of the
water column.
"w
Pilot studies to indicate sampling
locations and intervals are often
mandatory. Some studies require
random sampling points.
The number of sampling stations
that should be estabilshed is limited
by the capability of the laboratory to
analyze the samples, but should
approach the needs of the objectives
as closely as possible.
17-12
-------
Biological Field Methods
vn
Field conditions greatly affect the
plankton, and a record thereof
should be carefully identified with
the collection as in II above.
Provisions should be made for the
field stabilization of the sample
until the laboratory examination
can be made if more than an hour
or so is to elapse.
!
a Refrigeration or icing is very
helpful, but ice should never ;
be placed in_the sample. •
b Preservation by 5% formalin is
widely used but badly shrinks . :
animals and makes all forms
brittle. J
c Lugo Is solution is a good
preservative.
d Ultra-violet sterilization is
sometimes used in the laboratory'
to retard the decomposition bf;
plankton. ;
e A highly satisfactory merthiolate i
preservative has been described j
by Weber (1968).
COLLECTING FISH AND OTHER . j
NEKTON PLATES V, VI .
Fish and other nekton must be sought in i
the obscure and unlikely areas as well i
as the obvious locations in order for the j
collection to be complete. Several ; '
techniques should be employed where- ; . • |
ever possible (this is appropriate for , •
all biota). It is advisable to check with •
local authorities to inform them of the i j
reasons for sampling, because many of !
the techniques are not legal for the |
layman. In this area, perhaps more . S
than any other, professionally trained :
workers are important. Also, there i • .
must be at least one helper, as a single \
individual always has difficulty in pulling
both ends of a 20 foot seine simultaneously!!
The more common techniques are
listed below.
B Seines
1 Straight seines range from 4-6 feet
and upwards in length. "Common
sense" minnow seines with approxi-
mately 1/4 inch mesh are widely
used along shore for collecting the
smaller fishes.
2 Bag seines have an extra trap or
bag tied in the middle which helps
trap and hold fish when seining in
difficult situations.
C Gill nets are of use in offshore and/or
deep waters. They range in length
from approximately 30 yards upward.
A mesh size is designed to catch a
specified size of fish. The trammel
net is a variation of the gill net. .
D Traps range from small wire boxes or
: cylinders with inverted cone entrances!
to semi-permanent weirs a half mile oir
.more in length. All tend to induce fish
to swim into an inner chamber pro- j
tected by an inverted cone or V - shaped
notch to prevent escape. Current '
operated rotating fish traps are also
very effective (and equally illegal) in i
suitable situations. j
i
E Trawls are submarine nets, usually or
considerable size, towed by vessels at
speeds sufficient to overtake and scoop
in fish, etc. The mouth of the net muit
be held open by some device such as a!
long beam (beam trawl) or two or more
vanes or "otter boards" (otter trawl), j
Plate III !
Beam and otter trawls are usually
fished on the bottom, but otter
trawls when suitably rigged are
now being used to fish mid-depthsl
2 The midwater trawl resembles a :
huge plankton net many feet in
diameter. It is proving very effec-
tive for collecting at mid-depths.
17-13
-------
Biological Field Methods
FISH NETS
Gill
Hoop
PLATE V
17-14
-------
TJ
H
M
Cod end
Electrically
controlled doors
MIDWATER TRAWL
PLATE VI
M
o'
i—'
o
I
t—1
CJl
O
Q.
03
-------
Biological Field Methods.
Numerous special designs have been
developed. Plate VI
F Electric seines and screens are widely
employed by fishery workers in small
and difficult streams. They may also
be used in shallow water like areas with
certain reservations.
G Poisoning is much used in fishery studies
and management. Most widely used and
generally satisfactory is rotenone in
varying formulations, although many
others have been employed from time to
time, and some appear to be very good.
Under suitable circumstances, fish may
even be killed selectively according to
species. '
H Personal observation by competent
personnel, and also informal inquiries
and discussions .with local residents
will often yield information 6f real use.
Many laymen are keen observers,
although they do' not always understand I
what they are seeing. The organized
creel census technique yields data on
what and how many fish are being
caught.
I Angling remains in its own right a very
good technique in the hands of the skilled
practitioner, for determining what fish
are present. Spear-fishing also is now
being used in some studies.
J Fish and other nekton are often tagged
to trace their movements during ;
migration and at other times. Minia-
ture radio transmitters can now be j
attached or fed to fish (and other
organisms) which enable them to be
tracked over considerable distances.
Physiological information is often ;
obtained in this way. This is known as
telemetry,
VIII SPECIA L REQUIREMENTS ON BOATS
!
Handling biological collections (as con- i
trasted to chemical and physical sampling!)
on board boats differs with the size of the:
!_ craft and the magnitude of operations. \
Senle-plfesi&le tteme ape listed below.
Hoisting and many other types of gear are
used in common with other types of
collection, and will not be listed.
A Special Laboratory Room(s)
B Constant flow of Clean water for
culturing organisms. (Selection of
materials and design of a system to
insure non-toxic water may be very
troublesome but very important. )
C Live Box built into ship at water level
D Refrigeration System(s) .
1 For controlling temperature of
experimental organisms in
laboratory.
2 For deep -free zing and storage of ,
specimens to be examined later. .
j
E Storage Space (Unrefrigerated) j
••* i
', F Facilities for the safe storage and use;
: of microscopes and other laboratory j
• equipment. ,
i
i
G Facilities for the safe storage and use
of deck equipment.
. ^ ' \
H Administrative access to the Captain |
and Technical Leader in order to
coordinate requirements for biological
'. collection (such as a slow plankton towj)
with those for other collections. j
; • j
\ I Safety of personnel working in and j
I around boats, as well as in other field;
activities should be seriously con- j
i sidered and promoted at all times. j
x , OTHER TYPES OF BIOLOGICAL
FIELD STUDIES INCLUDE '
'
A Productivity Studies of Many Types
I B Life Cycle and Management
; C Distribution of Sport or (potentially) j
Commercial Species I
17-16
-------
Biological Field Methods
D Scattering Layers and Other Submarine
Sound Studies
E Artificial Culture of Marine Food Crops
F Radioactive Uptake
G Growth of Surface-Fouling Organisms
H Marine Borers
I Dangerous Marine Organisms
J Red Tides
K Others
X SOURCES OF COLLECTING
EQUIPMENT
Many specialized items of biological
collecting equipment are not available
from the usual laboratory supply houses.
Consequently, the American Society of
Limnology and Oceanography has compiled
a list of companies handling such items
and released it as "Special Publication
No. 1, Sources of Limnoligical and
Oceanographic Apparatus and Supplies. "
Available from the Secretary of the Society.
XI SAFETY
The hazards associated with work on or near
water require special consideration. Personnel
should not be assigned to duty alone in boats,
and should be competent in the use of boating
equipment (courses are offered by the U. S.
Coast Guard). Field training should also include
instructions on the proper rigging and handling
of biological sampling gear.
Life preservers( jacket type work vests) should
be wron at all times when on or near deep water.
Boats should have air-tight or foam-filled com-
partments for flotation and be equipped with
fire extinguishers, running lights, oars, and
anchor. The use of inflatable plastic or rubber
boats is discouraged.
All boat trailers should have two rear running
and stop lights and turn signals and a license
plate illuminator. Trailers 80 inches (wheel
to wheel) or more wide should be equipped with
amber marker lights on the front and rear of
the frame on both sides.
Laboratories should be provided with fire
extinguishers, fume hoods, and eye fountains.
Safety glasses should be worn when mixing
dangerous chemicals and preservatives.
A copy of the EPA Safety Manual is available
from the Office of Administration, Washington,
.D. C. (Reference: 10)
References
1 Arnold, E.L., Jr. and Gehringer, J.W.
High Speed Plankton Samplers,
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Spec. Sci.
Rept. Fish No. 88:1-6.
2 Barnes, H. (ed.). Symposium on New
Advances in Underwater Observations.
Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Liverpool.
pp. 49-64. 1953.
3 Hedgepeth, Joel W. Obtaining
Ecological Data in the Sea Chapter 4
in "Treatise on Marine Ecology and
Paleoecology" Memois 67. Geol.
Soc. Am. 1963.
4 Isaacs, John D. and Columbus, O. D.
Oceanographic Instrumentation NCR
Div. Phys. Sci. Publ. 309, 233 pp.
1954.
5 Jackson, H.W. A Controlled Depth
Volumetric Bottom Sampler. Prog.
Fish Cult., April, 1970.
6 Lagler, Karl F. Freshwater Fishery.
Biology, Wm. C. Brown Company.
Dubuque. 1956.
7 Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater. APHA,
AWWA, WPFC. Publ. by Am. Pub.
Health Assoc. New York.
17-17
-------
Biological Field Methods
8 Sverdrup, H. U. et al. Observations
and collections at sea. Chapter X
in: The Oceans, Their Physics,
Chemistry, and Biology. Prentice-
Hall, Inc., New York. 1087pp. 1942.
9 Usinger, R. L. Aquatic Insects of
California (Section on Field Methods).
University of California Press.
Berkeley. 1956.
10 Weber, C.I. Biological Field and Lab
Methods for Measuring the Quality of
Surface Waters and Effluents. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Nat-
ional Environmental Research Ctr.,
Cincinnati, OH Environmental Monitoring
Series 670/4-73-001. July, 1973.
11 Welch, Paul S. Limnological Methods.
The Blakiston Company, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. 1948.
12 FWPCA, Investigating Fish Mortalities.
USDI, No. CWT-5, 1970. U.S. Gov't.
Print. Off. 1970 0-380-257
This outline was prepared by H. W. Jackson,
Former Chief Biologist, National Training
Center, Office of Water Programs, EPA,
Cincinnati, OH 45268, and revised by
Ralph M. Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist,
National Training Center.
Descriptors:
Aquatic Environment, Analytical Techniques,
Sampling, On-Site Investigations, Preser-
vation, Samplers, Water Sampling,
Handling, Sample, Surface Waters, Aquatic
Life
17-18
-------
STREAM INVERTEBRATE DRIFT
I Invertebrates which are part of the benthos,
but under certain conditions become carried
downstream in appreciable numbers, are
. known as drift.
A Groups which have members forming a
conspicuous part of the drift include the
insect orders Ephemeroptera,
Trichoptera, Plecoptera and the crus-
tacean order Amphipoda.
B Other invertebrate groups exhibit drift
patterns.
II THREE BASIC TYPES OF DRIFT
ARE RECOGNIZED
A Catastrophic Drift
Floods wash numerous benthic organisms
downstream. Application of pesticides
may also cause such drift.
B Constant Drift (Incidental or Adventitious)
Organisms are constantly being dislodged
from the substrate during normal
activities and carried downstream.
C Periodic (Diel) or Behavioral Drift
In contrast to the other categories, this
is a specific behavior pattern and related
to circadian activity rhythms.
1 Seasonal drift occurs, for example,
in some maturing stoneflies which
drift downstream for emergence.
This is another reason for a serious
consideration of drift in bottom fauna
sampling since such presence of
stoneflies could easily be misinterpreted.
2 Periodic or diel drift occurs in peaks
for successive 24-hour periods.
a Night-active. Light intensity is the
phase-setting mechanism.
b Day-active. Water temperature
appears to be the phase-setter.
in DIEL DRIFT
A Diel activity rhythms generally include
two peaks during the 24-hour period;
one major and the other minor.
1 The bigeminus type in which the
major peak occurs first (after sunset).
§
O
FIGURE 1
2 The alternans pattern with the major
peak occurring last.
1200 1800 2400 0600
Time
Sunset Sunrise
FIGURE 2
B Drift Rate and Density (Waters. 1969)
1 Drift rate defined is ".. .the quantity
of organisms passing a width transect
or portion thereof, per unit time;
BI.ECO. 22a. 9.72
18-1
-------
Stream Invertebrate Drift
it is a measure of displacement or
the movement of organisms from one
place to another. "
Drift density "... is the quantity of
organisms per unit volume of water,
in much the same way as plankton
density can be defined. "
IV IMPLICATIONS FOR BIOLOGICAL
SAMPLING
A The drift from productive upstream
reaches may support a fish population
existing in relatively barren stream
sections.
B Drift will colonize artificial substrates,
such as suspended rock baskets, when
placed in such habitats.
C A bottom sampler such as the Surber, .
could also be sampling drift when only
resident benthic organisms are intended
to be collected. This would depend on
the hour of collection and length of time
the Surber sampler is in the water.
D Application of drift studies have been
widely used in pesticide related studies.
In conjunction with such studies, Dimond
concluded that:
1 The status of drift is a much better
indicator of the steady state and of
total productivity than is the status
of the bottom fauna.
2 Bottom sampling, however, is
superior when analyzing survival
and recovery of the quality of population.
3 A combination of both in such a
sampling program would be most
likely to yield the most useful data.
E Drift sampling techniques have been
useful for recovery of large numbers of
sand-dwelling mayflies, which were
once rarely collected.
V MAJOR TAXA INVOLVED IN DRIFT
A The crustacean order Amphipoda
1 Gammarus species
2 Hyalella azteca
B The Insect Orders
1 Ephemeroptera
Baetis species (apparently universal)
2 Plecoptera
3 Trichoptera
4 Dipt era
Simuliidae
5 Elmidae
C The main groups exhibiting very high
drift rates include: Baetis. some
Gammarus species, and some Simuliidae.
REFERENCES
1 Anderson, N. H. Biology and Down-
stream Drift of some Oregon
Trichoptera. Can. Entom. 99:507-
521. 1967.
2 Dimond, John B. Pesticides and
Stream Insects. Bull. 23, Maine
Forest Service, 21 pp. 1967.
3 Dimond, John B. Evidence that drift of
Stream Benthos is Density Related.
Ecology 48:855-857. 1967.
4 Pearson, William D., and Kramer,
Robert H. A Drift Sampler driven
by a Waterwheel. Limnology and
Oceanography 14(3):462-465.
5 Reed, Roger J. Some Effects of DDT on
the Ecology of Salmon Streams in
Southeastern Alaska. Spec. Sci.
Report-Fisheries 542:1-15. U.S.
Bureau Comm. Fisheries. 1966.
18-2
-------
Stream Invertebrate Drift
Waters, Thomas F. Interpretation of 8 Waters, Thomas F. Invertebrate
Invertebrate Drift in Streams. Drift-Ecology and Significance to
Ecology 46 (3):327-334. 1965. Stream Fishes. (T. G. Northco .e,
Ed.) Symposium Salmon and Trout
Waters, Thomas F. Diurnal Periodicity in Streams. University of British
in the Drift of a Day-active Stream Columbia, Vancouver, pp. 121-134.
Invertebrate. Ecology 49:152. 1968. 1969.
This outline was prepared by R. M.
Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist, National
Training Center, Water Programs Operations,
EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
18-3
-------
ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATES
I INTRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF
ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATES
A Artificial substrates are anything
deliberately placed in the water for the
purpose of providing a place for benthic
or attached (sessile, sedentary, etc.)
organisms to grow on or in. This is in
contrast to "bait" which is used as an
attractant.
B Their origins for commercial use, or human
food production are rooted in antiquity.
Some examples are:
1 Ropes, poles, brush, concrete
structures, and other objects thrust
into the bottom, or suspended in
estuarine waters to catch and grow
oysters and mussels (cultural techniques),
known virtually around the world.
2 Straw .or reed tepees planted in shallow
alkaline lakes (in Mexico for example)
to catch the eggs of Corixids (Insecta:
Order Hemiptera, back-swimmers).
Eggs are harvested by drying and
brushing them off onto white sheets.
Used for human food.
C The fouling of ships bottoms, piling, etc.
by barnacles and other marine life is an
"artificial substrate in reverse".
D The use of aggregate to support a zoogloeal
mass of micro-biota in a trickling filter,
thus simulating a riffle area in a surface
stream, is a modern concept to harness
and make use of "consumer" and "reducer"
elements of a community in order to
dissipate the energy (oxidize, exhaust the
food value) contained in sewage.
II ECOLOGICAL BASIS
A Artificial substrates are based on the
"laws of organismal distribution. "
1 Any given kind of organisms tends to be
present (inhabit) in all available suitable
habitats.
2 Any given habitat tends to be inhabited
by all suitably adapted kinds of
organisms.
B A "substrate" being an object (or group
of objects) constitutes a habitat suitable
for sessile or attached organisms, and
also those that naturally burrow in, crawl
over, or otherwise live associated with
objects. Natural objects here could mean
the bottom, stones, sticks (floating or
sunk), etc.
C Organisms that would not be attracted to
substrates would be plankton and nekton
(fish and larger swimming invertebrates).
D Ecological Succession
Colonization is rapid in a biologically
productive water, and normally reaches
a stable climax* community in about a
month. A typical outline of successive
forms to appear in a freshwater situation,
for example, might be as follows.
1 Periphyton (slime forming) stage
(see also below)
a Bacteria - within an hour
b Diatoms - within the first day
c Other micro-algae - within the first day
d Protozoa - within the first day
2 Macroinvertebrate dominated stage
(see also below)
a Primary attached or sedentary
colonizers - second to third day
1) Net caddisflies
2) Bryozoa
3) Cordylophora caspia
4) Hydra
*A community which has achieved a point of no further change, under a given set of
environmental conditions. Time scale may vary with circumstances.
NOTE: Mention of commercial products and manufacturers does not imply endorsement
by the Environmental Protection Agency.
BI.MET.fm.7d.9.72
19-1
-------
Artificial Substrates
in
b Primary foragers
1) Mayflies
2) Stoneflies
3) Midges
c Secondary attached or sedentary
colonizers:
1) Sponges
2) Filamentous algae
d Adventitious forms
1) Crustaceans
2) Flatworms
3) Leeches
4) Snails
5) Other
Artificial substrates in a marine
environment proceed through similar
stages, except that the macroinvertebrate
stage may be more subject to variation
in the attachment of broods of barnacle,
oyster, and other larvae resulting from
greater numbers of types present, tidal
current variation,, meteorological
conditions, etc.
ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATES AS SCIENTIFIC
COLLECTING DEVICES
A review of the history of artificial
substrates for collecting microorganisms
(aufwuchs) (Cooke, 1956) indicates that
glass microscope slides were first used
for this purpose about 1915. Wood or
metal panels appear, however, to have been
deliberately exposed for the scientific
collection of larger organisms at least
since approximately the turn of the century,
and probably long before that (Visscher, 1928).
B Biological Applications
The principles of the artificial substrate
remain the same, regardless of the
community sampled. Two general types
of communities and associated samplers
have been employed:
1 Periphyton (or aufwuchs) samplers
Periphyton is the community of slime
forming microorganisms which is the
first to attach to objects newly exposed
under water. This community is
generally considered to provide an
anchor layer to which other higher
forms of life can more readily attach.
It tends to persist until overgrown or
displaced by larger organisms, and
then in turn can be found spreading over
the surfaces of these same larger
plants and animals.
2 Periphyton has been widely studied as
it appears on 1 X3 glass microscope
slides which are equally convenient to
expose in the field and to study in the
laboratory.
3 Particular studies have included:
a The original bacterial and fungal
slime
b Diatom identification and counts
c Identification and counts of other
microscopic algae
d Protozoans
e Primary productivity
4 The macroinvertebrate community is
sampled by a great variety of devices
such as those cited below. The
organisms are usually removed from
the substrate for study. Applications
have included the following:
a General study of the macroinverte-
brate community
19-2
-------
Artificial Substrates
b Estimates of productivity
c Studies of the life cycle of particular
species
d Studies of the influence of the sub-
strate on the attachment of sessile
forms
1) The influence of toxic paints for
the prevention of fouling organisms
2) Wood panels to study the pene-
tration of boring molluscs and
crustaceans
C Effect of type of device on what is collected
1 Wood boring organisms like teredo
worms (Mollusca, Pelecypoda) or
gribbles (Arthropoda, Isopoda) would
obviously be attracted primarily to
wood (although 'some are known to bore
in other materials). •
2 Delicate forms and crawling forms
would be most likely to be collected on
devices having a shape to protect
against strong currents.
3 Those with strong attachments could
endure swift currents; often, surpris-
ingly, even during periods of original
attachment (ex. byssus attached clams
which are also benthic forms).
4 Bottom burrowers would be most likely
collected in artificially contained
portions of bottom material.
D Effect of Location
1 The depth at which a sampler is sus-
pended may influence the organisms
attracted.
2 Location in or out of a current, direct
sunlight, etc., will influence the take.
E Some Types of Devices
1 Cement plates, panels, and blocks
2 Ceramic tiles
3 Wood blocks
4 Metal plates
5 Glass slides -1X3 inch micro slides
are used by many workers. Numerous
devices are employed to hold them.
They are generally either floated
(Weber and Raschke 1966) or sus-
pended in racks, anchored to
submerged bricks or other objects.
6 Plastic petri dishes
Burba,nck and Spoon utilized an
ordinary 50 X 12 mm plastic petri
dish for collecting sessile protozoa.
Sickle modified this by using a
styrofoam cup (6 pz. size) with the
bottom third being cut off. The
lower unit of the plastic dish is
easily wedged into place in the cup
and the device is simply held by a
nylon line on a rope held in place by
an appropriate anchor and float.
The cup which tends to float is so
held that the petri dish bottom is in
a horizontal position and bottom side
up.
7 Multiple plate (Hester and Dendy, 1962)
a Common current procedure •
utilizes 3-inch squares of 1/4
inch thick Masonite separated
by 1-inch square spacers.
These may be:
b Threaded on an eye bolt or long
rod.
c Suspended by a loop of nylon cord.
8 Baskets or trays of bottom-type
material
a Trays of bottom material sunk in
the surface layer of the bottom.
b Baskets of stones suspended in
the water (Anderson and Mason,
1966).
9 Boxes, cages, bundles, etc., of
brush, reeds, or artificial material.
19-3
-------
Artificial Substrates
10 Polyethylene tapes
11 Plastic webbing
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company conservation web no. 200.
12 Styrofoam
13 Glass cover slips
Small slips are floated on the surface
of the water. Highly useful for protozoa
and rotifers. Remove and place on a
micro slide. Examine as a wet mount.
F Retrieval is an acute problem with all of
these samplers.
1 Physical factors
a Relocation
b Floods and drift
c High water
2 Well marked samplers or floats are
naturally vulnerable to the public,
resulting in disturbed, damaged, or
destroyed sample gear.
a This has been overcome by an
ingenious submerged float and
recovery line device. The weak
link in a submerged recovery line
is a modified flash bulb. An
electronic device actuated by an
underwater gun breaks the bulb
allowing the float and attached
line to surface. (Ziebell,
McConnell, and Baldwin)
b This unit has been further modified
by Fox (University of Georgia
Cooperative Fishery Unit) who
used an inexpensive detonator,
"Seal Salute". The latter is an
inexpensive fused charge designed
for underwater explosion.
IV ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATES OR SAMPLERS,
AND WATER QUALITY
A Artificial substrates provide a habitat
("place to live"). It follows from the
laws of distribution (II A I and 2 above),
that the community which inhabits a
device will be governed by the physical
nature or structure interacting with the
characteristics of the surrounding water •
(velocity, temperature, chemical
characteristics, etc.). Since the nature
of the sampler is controlled, it is evident
that the characteristics of the water
constitute the variable factor.
B Water Quality Surveillance
1 Similar substrates suspended side by
side in the same water tend to accumulate
(essentially) the same communities and
quantities of organisms.
2 Similar substrates suspended in different
waters accumulate different communities
and quantities.
3 Ergo: different communities and
quantities collected from similar
substrates at different places and times,
probably indicate different water qualities.
a These may be natural (seasonal,
diurnal, etc.)
b Or they may be a result of human
influences (pollution)
c A series of samplers the length of a
stream, lake, or estuary can suggest
"steady state" differences in water
quality.
d A series of samplers exposed over a
period of time at a given site can
suggest changes of water quality in
time.
4 The artificial substrate thus essentially
constitutes an in-situ bioassay of the
water.
19-4
-------
Artificial Substrates
Interpretation and Significance of
Collections
1 The unit of comparison is most
appropriately taken as "the sampler".
The artificial substrate by definition is
not the natural local bottom material,
and unless it consists of a portion of
that bottom which has been actually
removed and replaced in an artificial
container (IH-D-7)the composition and
magnitude of the community it contains
may or may not bear a definitive
relationship to the actual natural
problem. The take of the artificial
substrate thus may have relatively
little relationship to the take of a
Petersen or an Ekman grab (dredge).
2 Comparisons between different types
of samplers are likewise hazardous.
Each is what it is, and if they are
different they are not identical; thus
the biota each collects cannot be
expected to be identical (CF: H A).
3 Artificial substrates should generally
be compared on a "sampler vs sampler"
basis, or for periphyton, "unit area
vs unit area".
REFERENCES
1 Anderson, J. B. and Mason, William T. Jr.
A Comparison of Benthic Macro-
invertebrates collected by Dredge and
Basket Sampler. Jour. Water Poll.
Cont. Fed. 40(2):252-259.
2 Arthur, John W. and Horning, W.B., II.
The Use of Artificial Substrates in
Pollution Surveys. Amer. Midi. Nat.
82(l):83-89.
3 Besch, W., Hoffman, W., and Ellenberger,
W. Das Macrobenthos auf
Polyatchylensubstraten in Fliessgs-
wasseren. Annals de Limnologic.
3(2):331-367. 1967.
4 Burbanck, W.D. and Spoon, D.M. The
Use of Sessile Ciliates Collected in
Plastic Petri Dishes for Rapid
Assessment of Water Pollution.
J. Protozool. 14(4):739-744. 1967.
5 Cobke, William B. Colonization of
Artificial Bare Areas by Microorganisms.
Bot. Rev. 22(9):613-638. Nov. 1956.
6 Fox, Alfred C. Personal Communication.
1969.
7 Hester, F.E. and Dendy, J.S.
A Multiple-Plate Sampler for Aquatic
Macroinvertebrates. Trans.Am.
Fish. Soc. 91(4):420-421. April 1962.
8 Hilsenhoff, William L. An Artificial
Substrate Device for Sampling Benthic
Stream Invertebrates. Limnology and
Oceanography. 14(3):465-471. 1969.
9 Mason, W.T., Jr., Anderson, J. B., and
Morrison, G.E. A Limestone-Filled,
Artificial Substrate Sampler Float Unit
for Collecting Macroinvertebrates in
Large Streams. Prog. Fish-Cult.
29:74. 1967.
10 Ray, D. L. Marine Boring and Fouling
Organisms. University of Washington
Press, Seattle, pp 1-536. 1959.
11 Sickel, James B. A Survey of the
Mussel Populations (Unionidae) and
Protozoa of the Altamaha River with
Reference to their Use in Monitoring
Environmental Changes. MS Thesis.
Emory University. 133pp. 1969.
12 Sladeckova, A. Limnological Investigation
Methods for the Periphyton ("Aufwuchs")
Community. Bot. Rev. 28(2):286-350.
1962.
I
13 Spoon, D.M. and Burbanck, W.D. A
New Method for Collecting Sessile
Ciliates in Plastic Petri Dishes with
Tight Fitting Lids. J. Protozool.
14(4):735-739. 1967.
19-5
-------
Artificial Substrates
14 Visscher, J. Paul. Nature and Extent
of Fouling of Ships Bottom. Dept. 7=^ rp ——„ „,—r~
Comm. Bur. Com. Fish. Doc. ™1S °"tl™ WfS ^T™* *? *' .W" fljackfon'
No. 1031 pp 193-252 1928 Chief Biologist and R. M. Sinclair, Aquatic
INO. iuoi. pp i»o m. la^o. Biologist, National Training Center, Water
15 Weber, C.E. and Rauschke, R. L. Programs Operations. EPA, Cincinnati,
Use of a Floating Periphyton Sampler OH 45268.
for Water Pollution Surveillance.
Water Poll. Sur. Sept. Applications
and Develop. Report No. 20.
FWPCA-USDI, Cincinnati, Ohio.
September 1966.
JL6 Wene, George and Wickliff, E. L.
Modification of a Stream Bottom and
its Effect on the Insect Fauna.
Canadian Entomologist. Bull. 149,
5 pp. 1940.
17 ZiebeU, Charles D., McConnell, W. J.,
and Baldwin, Howard A. A Sonic
Recovery Device for Submerged
Equipment. Limnol. and Ocean.
13(1):198-200. 1968.
19-6
-------
ATTACHED GROWTHS
(Periphyton or Aufwuchs)
I The community of attached microscopic
plants and animals is frequently investigated
during water quality studies. The attached
growth community (periphyton) and suspended
growth community (plankton) are the principal
primary producers in waterways--they con-
vert nutrients to organic living materials and
store light originating energy through the
processes of photosynthesis. In extensive
deep waters, plankton is probably the pre-
dominant primary producer. In shallow lakes,
ponds, and rivers, periphyton is the predominant
primary producer. During the past two
decades, investigators of microscopic
organisms have increasingly placed emphasis
on periphytic growths because of inherent
advantages over the plankton when interpreting
data from surveys on flowing waters:
A Blum (1956) ";'.. .workers are generally
agreed that no distinctive association of
phytoplankton is found in streams, although
there is some evidence of this for individual
zooplankters (animals) and for a few
individual algae and bacteria. Plankton
organisms are often introduced into the
current from impoundments, backwater
areas or stagnant arms of the stream....
Rivers whose plankton is not dominated by
species from upstream lakes or ponds are
likely to exhibit a majority of forms which
have been derived from the stream bottom
directly and which are thus merely
facultative or opportunistic plankters. "
B "The transitory nature of stream plankton
makes it nearly impossible to ascertain at
which point upstream agents producing
changes in the algal population were
introduced, and whether the changes
occurred at the sampling site or at some
unknown point upstream. In contrast,
bottom algae (periphyton) are true com-
ponents of the stream biota. Their
sessile-attached mode of life subjects
them to the quality of water continuously
flowing over them. By observing the
longitudinal distribution of bottom algae
within a stream, the sources of the agents
producing the change can be traced
(back-tracked)" (Keup, 1966).
II TERMINOLOGY
A Two terms are equally valid and commonly
in use to describe the attached community
of organisms. Periphyton literally means
"around plants" such as the growths over-
growing pond-weeds; through usage this
term means the attached film of growths
that rely on substrates as a "place-to-
grow" within a waterway. The components
of this growth assemblage consists of
plants, animals, bacteria, etc. Aufwuchs
is an equally acceptable term [probably
originally proposed by Seligo (1905)].
Aufwuchs is a German noun without
equivalent english translation; it is
essentially a collective term equivalent
to the above American (Latin root) term -
Periphyton. (For convenience, only,
PERIPHYTON, with its liberal modern
meaning will be used in this outline.)
B Other terms, some rarely encountered in
the literature, that are essentially
synonymous with periphyton or describe
important and dominant components of the
periphytic community are: Nereiden,
Bewuchs, Laison, Belag, Besatz, attached,
sessile, sessile-attached, sedentary,
seeded-on, attached materials, slimes,
slime-growths, and coatings.
The academic community occasionally
employs terminology based on the nature
of the substrates the periphyton grows on
(Table 1).
TABLE 1
Periphyton Terminology Based
on Substrate Occupied
Substrate Adjective
various epiholitic, nereiditic, sessile
plants epiphytic
animals epizooic
wood epidendritic, epixylonic
rock epilithic
[After Srameck-Husek( 1946) and via Sladeckova
(1962)] Most kbove listed latin-root adjectives
are derivatives of nouns such as epihola,
epiphyton, spizoa, etc.
BI.MIC.enu. 19b.5.71
20-1
-------
Attached Growths (Periphyton or Aufwuchs)
III Periphyton, as with all other components
of the environment, can be sampled quali-
tatively (what is present) and quantitatively
(how much or many are present).
A Qualitative sampling can be performed by
many methods and may extend from direct
examination of the growths attached to a
substrate to unique "cuttings" or scraping*
It may also be a portion of quantitative
sampling.
B Quantitative sampling is difficult because
it is nearly impossible to remove the
entire community from a standardized or
unit area of substrate.
1 Areas scraped cannot be determined
precisely enough when the areas are
amorphous plants, rocks or logs that
serve as the principal periphyton
substrates.
2 Collection of the entire community within
a standard area usually destroys individual
specimens thereby making identification
difficult (careful scraping can provide
sufficient intact individuals of the species
present to make qualitative determinations);
or the process of collection adds sufficient
foreign materials (i. e. detritus, sub-
strate, etc.) so that some commonly
employed quantitative procedures are
not applicable.
IV Artificial substrates are a technique
designed to overcome the problems of direct .
sampling. They serve their purpose, but
cannot be used without discretion. They are
objects standardized as to surface area,
texture, position, etc. that are placed in the
waterway for pre-selected time periods during
which periphytic growths accumulate. They
are usually made of inert materials, glass
being most common with plastics second in
frequency. Over fifty various devices and
methods of support or suspension of the
substrates have been devised (Sladeckova,
1962) (Weber, 1966) (Thomas, 1968).
V ARTIFICIAL SUBSTRATE PLACEMENT
A Position or Orientation
1 Horizontal - Includes effects of settled
materials.
2 Vertical - Eliminates many effects of
settled materials.
B Depth (light) - A substrate placed in lighted
waters may not reflect conditions in a
waterway if much of the natural substrate
(bottom) does not receive light or receives
light at reduced intensity. (Both excessive
light and a shortage of light can inhibit
growths and influence the kinds of organisms
present.)
C Current is Important
1 It can prevent the settling of smothering
materials.
2 It flushes metabolic wastes away and
introduces nutrients to the colony.
VI THE LENGTH OF TIME THE SUBSTRATE
IS EXPOSED IS IMPORTANT.
A The growths need time to colonize and
develop on the recently introduced
substrate.
B Established growths may intermittently
break-away from the substrate because
of current or weight induced stresses, or
"over-growth" may "choke" the attachment
layers (nutrient, light, etc. restrictions)
which then weaken or die allowing release
of the mass.
C A minimum of about ten days is required
to produce sufficient growths on an
artificial substrate; exposures exceeding
a longer time than 4-6 weeks may produce
"erratic results" because of sloughing or
the accumulation of senile growths in
situations where the substrate is
artificially protected from predation and
other environmental stresses.
20-2
-------
Attached Growths (Periphyton or Aufwuchs)
VII Determining the variety of growths present
is presently only practical with microscopic
examination. (A few micro-chemical pro-
cedures for differentiation show promise--
but, are only in the early stages of development.)
Vin "DETERMINING THE QUANTITY OF
GROWTH(S)
A Direct enumeration of the growths while
attached to the substrate can be used, but
is restricted to the larger organisms
because (1) the problem of maintaining
material in an acceptable condition under
the short working distances of the objective
lenses on compound microscopes, and
(2) transmitted light is not adequate
„ because of either opaque substrates and/or
the density of the colonial growths.
B Most frequently, periphyton is scraped
from the substrate and then processed
according to several available procedures,
the selection being based on the need, and
use of the data.
1 Aliquots of the sample may be counted
using methods frequently employed in
plankton analysis.
a Number of organisms
b Standardized units
c Volumetric units
d Others
2 Gravimetric
a Total dry weight of scrapings
b Ash-free dry weight (eliminates
inorganic sediment)
c A comparison of total and ash-free
dry weights
3 Volumetric, involving centrifugation of
the scrapings to determine a packed
biomass volume.
4 Nutrient analyses serve as indices of
the biomass by measuring the quantity
of nutrient incorporated.
a Carbon
1) Total organic carbon
2) Carbon equivalents (COD)
b Organic nitrogen
c Phosphorus - Has limitations
because cells can store excess
above immediate needs.
d Other
5 Chlorophyll and other bio-pigment
extractions.
6 Carbon-14 uptake
7 Oxygen production, or respiratory
oxygen demand
K EXPRESSION OF RESULTS
A Qualitative
1 Forms found
2 Ratios of number per group found
3 Frequency distribution of varieties
found
4 Autotrophic index (Weber)
5 Pigment diversity index (Odum)
B Quantitative
1 Areal basis--quantity per square
inch, foot, centimeter, or meter.
For example:
a 16 mgs/sq. inch
b 16. 000 ceUs/sq. inch
2 Rate basis. For example:
a 2 mgs/day, of biomass accumulation
b 1 mg O./mg of growth/hour
20-3
-------
Attached Growths (Periphyton or Aufwuchs)
REFERENCES
1 Blum, J. L. The Ecology of River Algae.
Botanical Review. 22:5:291. 1956.
2 Dumont, H. J. A Quantitative Method for
the Study of Periphyton. Ldmnol.
Oceanogr. 14(2):584-595.
3 Keup, L.E. Stream Biology for Assessing
Sewage Treatment Plant Efficiency.
Water and Sewage Works. 113:11-411.
1966.
4 Seligo, A. Tiber den Ursprung der
Fischnahrung. Mitt. d. Westpr.
Fisch. -V. 17:4:52. 1905.
5 Sladeckova, A. Ldmnological Investigation
Methods for the Periphyton Community.
Botanical Review. 28:2:286. 1962.
6 Srameck-Husek. (On the Uniform
Classification of Animal and Plant
Communities in our Waters).
Sbornik MAP 20:3:213. Orig. in
Czech. 1946.
7 Thomas, N.A. Method for Slide
Attachment in Periphyton Studies.
Manuscript. 1968. "
8 Weber, C.I. Methods of Collection and
Analysis of Plankton and Periphyton
Samples in the Water Pollution
Surveillance System. Water Pollution
Surveillance System Applications "and
Development Report No. 19, FWPCA,
Cincinnati. 19+pp. (multilith). 1966.
9 Weber, C.I. "Annual Bibliography
Midwest Benthological Society.
Periphyton. 1014 Broadway,
Cincinnati, OH 45202.
10 Hynes, H.B.N. The Ecology of Running
Waters. Univ. Toronto Press.
555 pp. 1970.
This outline was prepared by Lowell E. Keup,
Chief, Technical Studies Branch, Division of
Technical Support, EPA, Washington, DC 20242.
20-4
-------
APPLICATION OF BIOLOGICAL DATA
I ECOLOGICAL DATA HAS TRADITIONALLY
BEEN DIVIDED INTO TWO GENERAL
CLASSES:
A Qualitative - dealing with the taxonomic
composition of communities
B Quantitative - dealing with the population
density or rates of processes occurring
in the communities
Each kind of data has been useful in its own
way.
H QUALITATIVE DATA
A Certain species have been identified as:
1 Clean water (sensitive) or oligotrophic
2 Facultative, or tolerant
3 Preferring polluted regions
(see: Fjerdinstad 1964, 1965; Gaufin
& Tarzwell 1956; Palmer 1963, 1969;
Rawson 1956; Telling 1955)
B Using our knowledge about ecological
requirements the biologist may compare
the species present
1 At different stations in the same river
(Gaufin 1958) or lake (Holland 1968)
2 In different rivers or lakes (Robertson
and Powers 1967)
or changes in the species in a river or/lake
over a period of several years. (Carr
& Hiltunen 1965; Edmondson & Anderson
1956; Fruh, Stewart, Lee & Rohlich 1966;
Hasler 1947).
C Until comparatively recent times taxonomic
data' were not subject to statistical treat-
ment.
Ill QUANTITATIVE DATA: Typical
Parameters of this type include:
2
A Counts - algae/ml; benthos/m ;
fish/net/day
3
B Volume - mm algae /liter
C Weight - dry wgt; ash-free wgt.
D Chemical content - chlorophyll;
carbohydrate; ATP; DNA; etc.
E Calories (or caloric equivalents)
F Processes - productivity; respiration
IV Historically, the chief use of statistics
in treating biological data has been in the
collection and analysis of samples for these
parameters. Recently, many methods have
been devised to convert taxonomic data into
numerical form to permit:
A Better communication between the
biologists and other scientific disciplines
B Statistical treatment of taxonomic data
C In the field of pollution biology these
methods include:
1 Numerical ratings of organisms on the
basis of their pollution tolerance
(saprobic valency: Zelinka & Sladecek
1964)
(pollution index: Palmer 1969)
2 Use of quotients or ratios of species in
different taxonomic groups (Nygaard
1949)
BI.EN.3a.12.70
21-1
-------
Application of Biological Data
3 Simple indices of community diversity:
a Organisms are placed in taxonomic
groups which behave similarly under
the same ecological conditions. The
number of species in these groups
found at "healthy" stations is com-
pared to that found at "experimental"
stations. (Patrick 1950)
b A truncated log normal curve is
plotted on the basis of the number
of individuals per diatom species.
(Patrick, Hohn, & Wallace 1954)
c Sequential comparison index.
(Cairns, Albough, Busey & Chanay
1968). In this technique, similar
organisms encountered sequentially
are grouped into "runs".
SCI =
runs
total organisms examined
d Ratio of carotenoids to chlorophyll
in phytoplankton populations:
OD4SO/QD866(MaP«tllrf 1968)
OD435/OD67Q(Tanaka, et al 1961)
e The number of diatom species present
at a station is considered indicative
of water quality or pollution level.
(Williams 1964)
, number of species (S)
number of individuals (N)
number of species (S)
square root of number of individuals («/ N)
j Information theory:
The basic equation used for
information theory applications was
developed by Margalef (1957).
N!
2 N !
N, !. ..N !
b s
where I - information/individual;
N , N, .. . N are the number of
individuals in species a, b, ...
s, and N is their sum.
This equation has also been used
with:
1) The fatty acid content of algae
(Mclntire, Tinsley, and Lowry •
1969)
2) Algal productivity (Dickman 1968)
3) Benthic biomass (Wilhm 1968)
S - 1
(Menhinick 1964)
En. (ii - 1) (Simpson 1949)
N (N - 1)
where n. = number of individuals
. belonging to the i-th species,
and
N = total number of individuals
REFERENCES
1 Cairns, J., Jr., Albough, D.W.,
Busey, F, and Chaney, M.D.
The sequential comparison index -
a simplified method for non-biologists
to estimate relative differences in
biological diversity in stream pollution
studies. J. Water Poll. Contr. Fed. .
40(9):1607-1613. 1968.
2 Carr, J. F. and Hiltunen, J.K. Changes
in the bottom fauna of Western Lake
Erie from 1930 to 1961. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 10(4):551-569. 1965.
3 Dickman, M. Some indices of diversity.
Ecology 49(6): 1191-1193. 1968.
21-2
-------
Application of Biological Data
4 Edmondson, W.T. and Anderson, G.C.
Artificial Eutrophication of Lake
Washington. Limnol. Oceanogr.
l(l):47-53. 1956.
5 Fjerdingstad, E. Pollution of Streams
estimated by benthal phytomicro-
organisms. I. A saprobic system
based on communities of organisms
and ecological factors. Internat'l
Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 49(1):63-131.1964.
6 Fjerdingstad, E. Taxonomy and saprobic
valency of benthic phytomicro-
organisms. Hydrobiol. 50 (4):475-604.
1965.
7 Fruh, E.G., Stewart, K.M., Lee, G.F.
and Rohlich, G.A. Measurements of
eutrophication and trends. J. Water
Poll. Contr. Fed. 38(8):1237-1258.
1966.
8 Gaufin, A.R. Effects of Pollution on a
midwestern stream. Ohio J. Sci..
58(4):197-208. 1958.
9 Gaufin, A.R. and Tarzwell, C.M. Aquatic
macroinvertebrate communities as
indicators of organic pollution in Lytle '
Creek. Sew. Ind. Wastes. 28(7):906-
924. 1956.
10 Hasler, A. D. Eutrophication of lakes by
domestic drainage. Ecology 28(4):383-
395. 1947.
11 Holland, R.E. Correlation of Melosira
species with trophic conditions in Lake
Michigan. Limnol. Oceanogr.
13(3):555-557. 1968.
12 Margalef, R. Information theory in
ecology. Gen. Syst. 3:36-71. 1957.
13 Margalef, R. Perspectives in ecological
theory. Univ. Chicago Press. 1968.
14 Mclntire, C.D., Tinsley, I.J. and
Lowry, R. R. Fatty acids in lotic
periphyton: another measure of
community structure. J. Phycol.
5:26-32. 1969.
15 Menhinick, E.F. A comparison of some
species - individuals diversity indices
applied to samples of field insects.
Ecology 45:859. 1964.
16 Nygaard, G. Hydrobiological studies in
some ponds and lakes, n. The
quotient hypothesis and some new or
little-known phytoplankton organisms.
Klg. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Biol.
Skrifter 7:1-293. 1949.
17 Patten, B.C. Species diversity in net
plankton of Raritan Bay. J. Mar.
Res. 20:57-75. 1962.
18 Palmer, C.M. The effect of pollution on
river algae. Ann. New York Acad.
Sci. 108:389-395. 1963.
19 Palmer, C. M. A composite rating of
algae tolerating organic pollution.
J., Phycol. 5(D:78-82. 1969.
20 Patrick, R., Hohn, M.H. and Wallace,
J.H. A new method for determining
the pattern of the diatom flora. Not.
Natl. Acad. Sci., No. 259.
Philadelphia. 1954.
21 Rawson, D. S. Algal indicators of trophic
lake types. Limnol. Oceanogr.
1:18-25. 1956.
22 Robertson, S. and Powers, C.F.
Comparison of the distribution of
organic matter in the five Great Lakes.
in: J. C. Ayers and D. C. Chandler,
eds. Studies on the environment and
eutrophication of Lake Michigan.
Spec. Rpt. No. 30, Great Lakes Res.
Div.,Inst. Sci. &Techn., Univ.
Michigan, Ann Arbor. 1967.
23 Simpson, E.H. Measurement of diversity.
Nature (London) 163:688. 1949.
24 Tanaka, O. H., Irie, S. Izuka, and Koga, F
The fundamental investigation on the
biological productivity in the Northwest
of Kyushu. I. The investigation of
plankton. Rec. Oceanogr. W. Japan,
Spec. Rpt. No. 5, 1-57. 1961.
21-3
-------
Application of Biological Data
25 Telling, E. Some mesotrophic phyto-
plankton indicators. Proc. Intern.
Assoc. Limnol. 12:212-215. 1955.
26 Wilhm, J. L. Comparison of some
diversity indices applied to populations
of benthic macroinvertebrates in a
stream receiving organic wastes. J.
Water Poll. Contr. Fed. 39(10):1673-1683.
1967.
28 Williams, L. G. Possible relationships
between diatom numbers and water
quality. Ecology 45(4):810-823. 1964.
29 Zelinka, M. and Sladecek, V. Hydro-
biology for water management.
State Publ. House for Technical
Literature, Prague. 122 p. 1964.
27 Wilhm, J. L. Use of biomass units in
Shannon's formula. Ecology 49:153-156.
1968.
This outline was prepared by C.I. Weber,
Chief, Biological Methods Section, Analytical
Quality Control Laboratory. NJERC. EPA,
Cincinnati, OH 45268.
21-4
-------
USING BENTHIC BIOTA IN WATER QUALITY EVALUATIONS
I BENTHOS ARE ORGANISMS GROWING
ON OR ASSOCIATED PRINCIPALLY
WITH THE BOTTOM OF WATERWAYS
Benthos is the noun.
Benthonic, benthal and benthic are
adjectives.
II THE BENTHIC COMMUNITY
A Composed of a wide variety of life
forms that are related because they
occupy "common ground"--the water-
ways bottom'substrates. Usually
they are attached or have relatively
weak powers of locomotion. These
life forms are:
1 Bacteria
A wide variety of decomposers work
on organic materials, breaking them
down to elemental or simple com-
pounds (heterotrophic). Other forms
grow on basic nutrient compounds or
form more complex chemical com-
pounds (autotrophic).
2 Algae
Photo synthetic plants having no true
roots, stems, and leaves. The basic
producers of food that nurtures the
animal components of the community.
3 Flowering Aquatic Plants (Pondweeds)
The largest flora, composed of
complex and differentiated tissues.
Many are rooted.
4 Microfauna
Animals that pass through a U. S.
Standard Series No. 30 sieve, but
are retained on a No. 100 sieve.
Examples are rotifers and micro-
crustaceans. Some forms have
organs for attachment to substrates,
while others burrow into soft
materials or occupy the interstices
between rocks, floral or faunal
materials.
5 Meiofauna
Animals, mostly metazoans, that
can pass a 1. 0 mm to 0. 5 mm
screen. Examples are naiad
worms and flatworms.
6 Macrofauna
Animals that are retained on a
No. 30 sieve. This group includes
the insects, worms, molluscs, and
occasionally fish. Fish are not
normally considered as benthos,
though there are bottom dwellers
such as sculp ins and darters.
B It is a self-contained community, though
there is interchange with other commun-
ities. For example: Plankton settles
to it, fish prey on it and lay their eggs
there, terrestrial detritus leaves are
added to it, and many aquatic insects
migrate from it to the terrestrial en-
vironment for their mating cycles.
C It is a stationary water quality monitor.
The low motility of the biotic compon-
ents requires that they "live with" the
quality changes of the over-passing
waters. Changes imposed in the long-
lived components remain visible for
extended periods, even after the cause
has been eliminated. Only time will
allow a cure for the community by drift
and reproduction.
HI HISTORY OF BENTHIC OBSERVATIONS
A Ancient literature records the vermin
associated with fouled waters.
B 500-year-old fishing literature refers
to animal forms that are fish food and
used as bait.
BI. MET. fm.Se. 1.74
22-1
-------
Using Benthic Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
C The scientific literature associating
biota to water pollution problems is
over 100 years old (Mackenthun and
Ingram, 1964).
D Early this century, applied biological
investigations were initiated.
1 The entrance of State boards of Health
into water pollution control activities.
2 Creation of state conservation agencies.
3 Industrialization and urbanization.
4 Growth of Hmnological programs
at universities.
E A decided increase in benthic studies
occurred in the 1950 decade, and much
of today's activities are strongly influenced
by developmental work conducted during
this period. Some of the reasons for this
are:
1 Movement of the universities from
"academic biology" to applied
pollution programs.
2 Entrance of the federal government
into enforcement aspects of water
pollution control.
3 A rising economy and the development
of federal grant systems.
4 Environmental Protection Programs
are a current stimulus.
IV WHY THE BENTHOS?
A It is a natural monitor
B The community contains all of the
components of an ecosystem.
1 Reducers
2 Producers
3 Consumers
a Detritivores and bacterial feeders
b Herbivores
c Predators
C Economy of Survey
1 Manpower
2 Time
3 Equipment
D Extensive Supporting Literature
E Advantages of the Macrobenthos
1 Relatively sessile
2 Life history length
3 Fish food organisms
4 Reliability of Sampling
5 Dollars/information
6 Predictability
7 Universality
V REACTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY TO
POLLUTANTS
A Destruction of Organism Types
1 Beginning with the most sensitive forms,
pollutants kill in order of sensitivity
until the most tolerant form is the last
survivor. This results in a reduction
of variety or diversity of organisms.
2 The usual order of macroinvertebrate
disappearance on a sensitivity scale
below pollution sources is shown in
Figure 2.
Water
Quality
Deteriorati
>
Stoneflies ,
Mayflies
ng Caddisflies
Amphipods
Isopods
Midges
Oligochaetes
> Water
Quality
Improving
22-2
-------
Using Benthic Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
As water quality improves, these
reappear in the same order.
B The Number of Survivors Increase
1 Competition and predation are reduced
between forms.
2 When the pollutant is a food (plants,
fertilizers, animals, organic materials)
C The Number of Survivors Decrease
1 The material added is toxic or has no
food value.
2 The material added produces toxic
conditions as a byproduct of decom-
position (e.g., large organic loadings
produce an anaerobic environment
resulting in the production of toxic
sulfides, methanes, etc.)
D The Effects May be Manifest in Com-
binations
1 Of pollutants and their effects.
2 Vary with longitudinal distribution
in a stream. (Figure 1)
E Tolerance to Enrichment Grouping
(Figure 2)
Flexibility must be maintained in the
establishment of tolerance lists based
on the response of organisms to the
environment because of complex relation-
ships among varying environmental
conditions. Some general tolerance
patterns can be established. Stonefly
nymphs, mayfly naiads, hellgrammites,
and caddisfly larvae represent a grouping
(sensitive or intolerant) that is general-
ized quite sensitive to environmental
changes. Blackfly larvae, scuds, sow-
bugs, snails, fingernail clams, dragon-
fly nymphs, damselfly nymphs, and most
kinds of midge larve are intermediate
(facultative or intermediate) in tolerance.
Sludge-worms, some kinds of midge
larvae (bloodworms), and some leeches
DIRECTION OF FLOW
111
ID
w
o:
A.
8;
fc,'
i;
I I
B.
M , \
I ' \
c.
OT
111
D.
to
in
w
I
i
TIME OR DISTANCE
..NUMBER OF KINDS
..NUMBER OF ORGANISMS
'I, SLUDGE DEPOSITS
Four basic responses oi bottom animals to pollution.
A. Organic wastes eliminate the sensitive bottom animals
and provide food in the form of sludges for the surviving toler-
ant forms. B. Large quantities of decomposing organic wastes
eliminate sensitive bottom animals and the excessive quanti-
ties of byproducts of organic decomposition inhibit the tolerant
forms; in time, with natural stream purification, water quality
improves so that the tolerant forms can flourish, utilizing the
sludges as food. C. Toxic materials eliminate the sensitive
bottom animals; sludge is absent and food is restricted to thai
naturally occurring in the stream, which limits the number oi
tolerant surviving forms. Very toxic materials may eliminate
all organisms below a waste source. D. Organic sludges with
toxic materials reduce the number of kinds by eliminating
sensitive forms. Tolerant survivors do not utilize the organic
sludges because the toxicity restricts their growth. •
Figure 1
are tolerant to comparatively heavy loads
of organic pollutants. Sewage mosquitoes
and rat-tailed maggots are tolerant of
anaerobic environments.
22-3
-------
Using Benthic Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
F Structural Limitations
I The morphological structure of a
species limits the type of environment
it may occupy.
a Species with complex appendages
and exposed complicated respiratory
structures, such as stonefly
nymphs, mayfly nymphs, and
caddisfly larvae, that are subjected
to a constant deluge of setteable
particulate matter soon abandon
the polluted area because of the
constant preening required to main-
tain mobility or respirotory func-
tions; otherwise, they are soon
smothered.
b Benthic animals in depositing zones
may also be burdened by "sewage
fungus" growths including stalked
protozoans. Many of these stalked
protozoans are host specific.
2 Species without complicated external
structures, such as bloodworms and
sludgeworms, are not so limited in
adaptability.
a A sludgeworm, for example, can
burrow in a deludge of particulate
organic matter and flourish on the
abundance of "marina."
b Morphology also determines the
species that are found in riffles, on
vegetation, on the bottom of pools,
or in bottom deposits.
VI SAMPLING PROCEDURES
A Fauna
1 Qualitative sampling determines the
variety of species occupying an area.
Samples may be taken by any method
that will capture representatives of the
species present. Collections from such
samplings indicate changes in the
environment, but generally do not
accurately reflect the degree of
change. Mayflies, for example, may
be reduced from .100 to 1 per square
foot. Qualitative data would indicate
the presence of both species, but might
not necessarily delineate the change in
predominance from mayflies to sludge-
worms. The stop net or kick sampling
technique is often used.
2 Quantitative sampling is performed to
observe changes in predominance. The
most common quantitative sampling
tools are the Petersen and Elkman
REPRESENTATIVE BOTTOM-DWELLING MACROANIMALS
Drawings from Geckler, j.f K. M. Mackenthun and W.M. Ingram, 1963.
Glossary of Commonly Used Biological and Related Terms in Water and
Waste Water Control, .DHEW. PHS, Cincinnati. Ohio, Pub. No. 999-WP-2.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
(Plecoptera)
(Ephemeroptera)
Stonefly nymph
Mayfly nymph
Hellgrammite or
Dobsonfly larvae (Megaloptera)
Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera)
Black fly larvae (Simuliidae)
Scud (Amphipoda)
Aquatic sowbug (Isopoda)
Snail (Gastropoda)
Fingernail clam (Sphaeriidae)
Dams elf ly nymph (Zygoptera)
Dragonfly nymph (Anisoptera)
Bloodworm or midge
(Chironomjdae)
(Hirudinea)
(Tubificidae)
(Psyehodidae)
(Tubifera-Eristalis)
I
J
K
L
fly larvae
M Leech
N Sludgeworm
O Sewage fly larvae
P Rat-tailed maggot
KEY TO FIGURE 2
22-4
-------
Using Benthic -Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
F G
INTERMEDIATE
M
TOLERANT
22-5
-------
Using Benthic Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
grabs and the Surber stream bottom
or square-foot sampler. Of these,
the Petersen grab samples the widest
variety of substrates. The Ekman
grab is limited to fine-textured and
soft substrates, such as silt and sludge.
The Surber sampler is designed for
sampling riffle areas; it requires
'moving water to transport dislodged
organisms into its net and is limited
to depths of two feet or less.
The collected sample is screened with
a standard sieve to concentrate the
organisms; these are sorted from
the retained material, and the number
of each kind determined. Data are then
adjusted to number per unit area,
usually to number of bottom per
square meter.
Independently, neither qualitative not
quantitative data suffice for thorough
analyses of environmental conditions.
A cursory examination to detect damage
may be made with either method, but
a combination of the two gives a more
precise determination. If a choice must
be made, quantitative sampling would
be best, because it incorporates a
partial qualitative sample.
B Flora
Direct quantitative sampling of natu-
rally growing bottom algae is difficult.
It is basically one of collecting algae
from a standardor uniform area of the
bottom substrates without disturbing
the delicate growths and thereby dis-
tort the sample. Indirect quantitative
sampling is the best available method.
Artificial substrates, such as wood
blocks, glass or plexiglass slides,
bricks, etc., are placed in a stream.
Bottom-attached algae will grow on
these artificial substrates. After two
or more weeks, the artificial sub-
strates are removed for analysis.
Algal growths are scraped from the.
substrates and the qunatity measured.
.Since the exposed substrate area and
exposure periods are equal at all of
the sampling sites, differences in the
quantity of algae can be related to
changes in the quality of water flowing
over the substrates.
The quantity of algae on artificial sub-
strates can be measured in several
ways. Microscopic counts of algal
cells and dry weight of algal material
are long established methods.
Microscopic counts involve thorough
scraping, mixing, and suspension of
the algal cells. From this mixture
an aliquot of cells is withdrawn for
enumeration under a microscope. Dry
weight is determined by drying and
weighing the algal sample, then ig-
niting the sample to burn off the algal
materials, leaving inert inorganic
materials that are again weighed.
The difference between initial weight
and weight after ignition is attributed
to algae.
Any organic sediments, however, that
settle on the artificial substrate along
with the algae are processed also.
Thus, if organic wastes are present
appreciable errors may enter into
this method.
During the past decade, chlorophyll
analysis has become a popular method
for estimating algal growth. Chloro-
phyll is extracted from the algae, and
is used as an index of the quantity of
algae present. The advantages of
chlorophyll analysis are rapidity,
simplicity, and vivid pictorial results.
The algae are. scrubbed from the
artificial substrate samples, ground,
then each sample is steeped in equal
volumes, 90% aqueous acetone, which
extracts the chlorophyll from the algal
cells. The chlorophyll extracts may
be compared visually.
22-6
-------
Using Benthic Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
Because the chlorophyll extracts fade
with time, colorimentry should be used
for permanent records. For routine
records, simple colorimeters will
suffice. At very high chlorophyll
densities, interference with colori-
metry occurs, which must be corrected
through serial dilution of the sample
or with a nomograph.
4 Autotrophic Index
The chlorophyll content of the periphyton
is used to estimate the algal biomass and
as an indicator of the nutrient content
(or trophic status) or toxicity of the
water and the taxonomic composition
of the community. Periphyton growing
in surface water relatively free of
organic pollution consists largely of
algae, which contain approximately
1 to 2 percent chlorophyll a by dry
weight. If dissolved or particulate
organic matter is present in high con-
centrations, large populations of
filamentous bacteria, stalked protozoa,
and other nonchlorophyll bearing micro-
organisms develop and the percentage
of chlorophyll a is then reduced. If the
biomass-chlorophyll a relationship is
expressed as a ratio (the autotrophic
index), values greater than 100 may
result from organic pollution (Weber
and McFarland, 1969; Weber, 1973).
Autotrophic Index
Ash-free Wgt (mg/m )
Chlorophyll a (mg/m2)
VII FACTORS INVOLVED IN DATA INTER-
PRETATION
Two very important factors in data evalua-
tion are a thorough knowledge of conditions
under which the data were collected and a
critical assessment of the reliability of the
data's representation of the situation.
A Maximum-Minimum Values
The evaluation of physical and chemical
data to determine their effects on aquatic
organisms is primarily dependent on
maximum and minimum observed values.
The mean is useful only when the data are
relatively uniform. The minimum or
maximum values usually create acute
conditions in the environment.
B Identification
Precise identification of organisms to
species requires a specialist in limited
taxonomic groups. Many immature
aquatic forms have not been associated
with the adult species. Therefore, one
who is certain of the genus but not the
species should utilize the generic name,
not a potentially incorrect species name.
The method of interpreting biological
data on the basis of numbers of kinds
and numbers of organisms will typically
suffice.
C Lake and Stream Influence
Physical characteristics of a body of
water also affect animal populations.
Lakes or impounded bodies of water
support different faunal associations
from rivers. The number of kinds
present in a lake may be less than that
found in a stream because of a more
unifrom habitat. A lake is all pool,
but a river is composed of both pools
and riffles. The nonflowing water of
lake exhibits a more complete set-
tling of particulate organic matter that
naturally supports a higher population
of detritus consumers. For these
reasons, the bottom fauna of a lake
or impoundment cannot be directly
compared with that of a flowing stream.
D Extrapolation
How can bottom-dwelling macrofauna
data be extrapolated to other environ-
mental components? It must be borne
in mind that a component of the total
environment is being sampled. If the
sampled component exhibits changes,
then so must the other interdependent
components of the environment. For
example, a clean stream with a wide
variety of desirable bottom organisms
22-7
-------
Using Benthic Biota in-Water Quality Evaluations
would be expected to have a wide vari-
ety of desirable bottom fishes; when
pollution reduces the number of bottom
organisms, a comparable reduction
would be expected in the number of
fishes. Moreover, it would be logical
to conclude that any factor that elim-
inates all bottom organisms would
eliminate most other aquatic forms
of life.
VII IMPORTANT ASSOCIATED ANALYSES
A The Chemical Environment
1 Dissolved oxygen
2 Nutrients
3 Toxic materials
4 Acidity and alkalinity
5 Etc.
B The Physical Environment
1 Suspended solids
2 Temperature
3 Light penetration
4 Sediment composition
5 Etc.
K AREAS IN WHICH BENTHIC STUDIES
CAN BEST BE APPLIED
A Damage Assessment
If a stream is suffering from pollutants,
the biota will so indicate. A biol&gist
can determine damages by looking at the
"critter" assemblage in a matter of hours.
Usually, if damages are not found, it will
not be necessary to alert the remainder
of the agency's staff, pack all the equip-
ment, pay travel and per diem, and then
wait five days before enough data can be
assembled to begin evaluation.
B By determining what damages have been
done, the potential cause "list" can be
reduced to a few items for emphasis and
the entire "wonderful worlds" of science
and engineering need not be practiced with
the result that much data are discarded
later because they were not applicable to
the problem being investigated.
C Good benthic data associated with chemical,
physical, and engineering can be data
used to predict the direction of future
changes and to estimate the amount of
pollutants that need to be removed from
the waterways.
REFERENCES
1 Hynes, H. B. N. The Ecology of Running
Waters. Univ. Toronto Press. 1970.
2 Keup, L. E., Ingram, W.M. and
Mackenthun, K. M. The Role of
Bottom Dwelling Macrofauna in Water
PoUution Investigations. USPHS
Environmental Health Series Publ.
No. 999-WP-38, 23 pp. 1966.
3 Keup, L. E., Ingram, W.M. and
Mackenthun, K. M. Biology of Water
Population: A Collection of Selected
Papers on Stream Pollution, Waste
Water, and Water Treatment.
Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration Pub. No. CWA-3,
290pp. 1967.
4 Mackenthun, K.M. The Practice of
Water PoUution Biology. FWQA.
281 pp. 1969.
5 Stewart, R.K., Ingram, W.M. and
Mackenthun, K.M. Water Pollution
Control, Waste Treatment and Water
Treatment: Selected Biological Ref-
erences on Fresh and Marine Waters.
FWPCA Pub. No..WP-23, 126pp. 1966.
22-8
-------
Using Benthic Biota in Water Quality Evaluations
Weber, Cornelins I., Biological Field
and Laboratory Methods for Measuring This outline was prepared by Lowell E.
the Quality of Surface Waters and Keup, Chief, Technical Studies Branch,
Effluents. U. S. Environmental Pro- Div. of Technical Support, EPA, Wash-
tection Agency, NERC, Cincinnati, ington, D. C. 20242, and revised by
OH . Environmental Monitoring Series Ralph M. Sinclair, Aquatic Biologist,
670/4.73.001 July 1973 National Training Center, EPA, WPO,
Cincinnati, OH 45268.
Descriptors:
Aquatic Life, Benthos, Water Quality,
Degradation, Environmental Effects,
Trophic Level, Biological Communities,
Ecological Distributions
22-9
-------