U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                          National Technical Information Service
                          PB-263 560
Analytical  Methods  for
Trace  Metals

National Training and Operational Tech Center,  Cincinnati, Ohio
Jan 76

-------
TRAINING MANUAL
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                         ' v   j*

OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAM OPERATIONS ,

-------
BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA 1- Rf JT/^Q/ ! _76.002 *
4. Title and Subtitle
Analytical Methods for Trace Metals
7" 3acWfaff
9. Performing Organization Name and Address
EPA, OWPO, MOTD
National Training and Operational Technology Center
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
Same as #9 above
3. Recipient's Accession No.
5* Report Date
6.
8. Performing Organization Kept.
No.
10. Project /Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contract /Grant No.
13. Type of Report & Period
Covered
14.
15. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstracts

  This course is designed for chemists or technicians of industrial or municipal
  treatment plants who are  required to perform analysis for trace metals.  Participants
  will learn theoretical concepts and will perform a variety of laboratory determina-
  tions.   Topics will include metal analysis by atomic absorption, flame photometry
  and volumetric and colorimetric procedures..
J7. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17o. Descriptors

  Atomic Absorption - Trace metals  - Analysis - Chemical analysis -
  Data Handling- Municipal Wastes - Wastewater - Water analysis  - Samples -
  Sampling - Quality Control - Instrumentation - Laboratory Tests - Monntoring
  Reports.
17b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
17c. COSATI Field/Group   07B,  14B
18. Availability Statement

  Release to public
 ">F1M NTIS-35 (REV. 3-72)
19. Security Class (This
   Report)
	UNCLASSIFIED
                                                       20. Security Class (This
                                                          Page
                                                            UNCLASSIFIED

-------
                                                EPA-430/1-76-002
                                                January 1976
ANALYTICAL  METHODS FOR  TRACE METALS
   This course is designed for chemists or technicians
   who will perform trace metal analyses in industrial
   or municipal wastewaters and treatment plant
   effluents.   The analyses presented conform to the
   guidelines required pursuant to Section 304(g) of
   the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amend-
   ments of 1972.
   U. S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
         Office of Water Program Operations
            TRAINING  PROGRAM

-------
                                      CONTENTS



Title or Description                                                      Outline Number

   Chemical Analyses                                                            !-•

   Methodology for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater                     2

   Sample Handling - Field Through Laboratory                                    3

   Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry                                          4

   Energy Sources for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy                             5

   Principles of Absorption Spectroscopy                                          6

   Flame Photometry                                                            7

   Determination of Calcium  and Magnesium Hardness                             8

   Flameless Mercury for Analytical  Methods for Trace Metals -                   9
   Determination of Mercury

   Determination of Lead                                                        10

   Burners and Fuel Mixtures                                                   11

   Flame Photometry Laboratory (Sodium)                                        12

   Flame Photometry Laboratory (Strontium)                                     13

   Laboratory Procedure for Total  Hardness                                     14

-------
                                   CHEMICAL ANALYSES
I  FEDERAL REGISTER GUIDELINES

A  Authority

   Section 304(g) Public Law 92-500 required
   the EPA Administrator to promulgate guide-
   lines establishing test procedures for the
   analysis  of pollutants that would include
   the factors that must be provided in any
   certification (section 401) or permit
   application (section 402).  These test
   procedures are to be used by applicants
   to  demonstrate that effluent discharges
   meet applicable pollutant discharge
   limitations, and by  the States and other
   enforcement activities in routine or
   random monitoring  of effluents to verify
   effectiveness of pollution control
   measures.

B  Establishment

   Following a proposed listing there was a
   period for reply by  interested parties.
   The final rulemaking was published in
   the Federal Register on October 16,  1973.

C  Format

   The Guidelines are  given in a Table which
   lists 71 different parameters, the method-
   ology to be used to determine them and
   the page numbers in standard references
   where the analytical procedure can be
   found.

   1   Divisions

      The 71 parameters are divided as
      follows: there are 15 general
      analytical parameters,  28 trace
      metals,  17 nutrients, anions or
      organic^ 6 physical or biological and
      5 radiological.

    2  SourceS'Of procedures

      The standard references cited as
      sources of the analytical procedures
      for these listings are Standard
      Methods, l ASTM, Part 232 and the
      EPA Chemical Methods Manual. 3
      Additional  sources of procedures are
      given as footnotes to the Table.
II  EPA CHEMICAL METHODS MANUAL

 The EPA Chemical Methods Manual was    ,
 developed for their water quality laboratories
 using Standard Methods and ASTM as basic
 references.

 A Analytical Procedures

   The manual cites page numbers in these
   two references where the analytical
   procedures can be found.  In some cases,
   EPA modified methods from these
   sources or else developed methods suit-
   able for their own laboratories.

 B Other Features

   For most of the measurements presented
   in the EPA Chemical Methods Manual,
   precision 'and accuracy data from inter-
   laboratory quality control  studies are
   given for  the method cited»  The manual
   also contains a section on  sampling and
   preservation.  This is in tabular form
   and contains information on volumes
   required for analysis,  the type of container
   that can be used, preservation measures
   and holding times.
CH. 13.9.75
                                      1-1

-------
     Chemical Analyses
   III   STATUS OF 1974 EPA MANUAL

     A  Regarding 1973 Guidelines

        Some of the methods included in the
        1974 EPA Manual are not automatically
        acceptable for certification or permit
        requirements.  These methods were
        published in anticipation of proposed
        additions to the Federal Register Guide-
O       lines.  When using this 1974  edition,
        one must first consult the October 16,
        1973 Federal Register in the table
        column which classifies the method(s)
        approved for a given parameter.  Then
        if the procedure for that specified
        method is given  in the 1974 EPA Chem-
        ical Methods Manual,  that procedure
        is acceptable for certification or permit
        requirements.

     B  Example of Use

        For example, Federal Register
        parameter no. 52, fluoride,  is to be
        measured using  "Distillation-SPADNS. "
        The 1974 EPA Manual has a procedure
        for fluoride using the cited SPADNS
        Method with Bellack Distillation,  so
        this procedure is automatically accept-
        able for certification and permit
        requirements.  On the other  hand, the
        1974 EPA Manual also has an electrode
        method for measuring fluoride.  Since
        the Federal Register does not currently
        list an  electrode as an approved method
        for measuring fluoride, one may not
        use this method without formal appli-
        cation to  do so.
    IV  METHODS NOT IN 1973 GUIDELINES

     A  Application to Use

        The system for application to use methods
        not listed in the October 16,  1973
        Federal Register is given in that publica-
        tion.  One supplies reasons for using an
        alternative method to the EPA Regional
   Administrator through the state agency
   which issues certifications and/or permits.
   If the state does not have such an agency,
   the application is submitted directly to the
   EPA Regional Administrator.

 B Order of Processing

   Before approving such applications, the
   Regional Administrator sends a copy to
   the Director of the EPA Methods
   Development and Quality Assurance  •
   Research Laboratory (MDQARL),  If the
   Regional Administrator rejects any
   application,  a copy is also sent to
   MDQARL.  Within 90 days the applicant
   is to be notified (along with the appropri-
   ate state agency) of approval or rejection.
   MDQARL also receives a copy of approval
   or rejection notifications for purposes of
   national coordination.
V  REQUIRED ANALYSES

 Which measurements are to be done and
 reported depend on the specifications of the
 individual certifications or permits.

 A Mandatory for  Secondary Plants

   By July 1, 1977 all municipal secondary
   wastewater treatment plants will be
   required to measure and report pH,
   BOD,, (biochemical oxygen demand),
   suspended solids, fecal coliform bacteria
   and flow.  Many plants are required  to
   report these now.

 B Additional for  Secondary Plants

   Other measurements which may be
   required of secondary treatment plants
   are residual chlorine,  settleable solids,
   COD  (chemical oxygen  demand),  total
   phosphorus, and the nitrogen series
   (total N.NH,-N,  NO0-N, NO0-N).
               O       O       "

 C Municipalities  and Industries

   Beyond these listings,  required analyses
   will depend on  the specific situation of
   municipality^ and of each industry.
       1-2

-------
                                                                    Chemical Analyses
     1  Non-specific

       Non-specific measurements to assess
       overall water quality might be required
       like acidity,  alkalinity, color, tur-
       bidity,  specific conductance.

     2  Organics

       Various organic analyses might be
       relevant such as total organic carbon,
       organic nitrogen, phenols, oil and
       grease,  surfactants.

     3  Metals

       Specified metals may be of interest.
       Currently, the Federal Register lists
       28 trace metals in the test  procedure
       guidelines.

     4  Others

       Cyanide, bromide,  chloride, fluoride
       and hardness are other measurements
       that might be required of individual
       industries.
      specified by the permit cannot be over-
      stressed.             ''

   B  Record Keeping

     Keeping complete and permanent records
     about the sample is also essential. Such
     records include conditions when the sample
     was collected, chain of custody signatures
     and details and results of analyses.

   C  Quality Control

      Whether the analyses are done in-house
      or by a service laboratory, an Analytical
      Quality Control Program should be estab-
      lished.  Fifteen to twenty percent of
      analytical time (cost) should be given to
      checking standard curves for colorimetry,
      analyzing duplicate samples to check pre-
      cision and analyzing spiked samples to
      check accuracy.  Recording precision and
      accuracy data on quality control charts is
      an effective method of using such data as
      a daily check on analytical performance.
      This can also be  done with numbers
      reported on "blind" samples sent to service
      labs.
VI  METHODOLOGY AND SKILLS

 A Methodology

    The analytical methods specified in the Fed-
    eral Register for these measurements range
    from "wet" procedures using equipment com-
    monly found in most laboratories to proce-
    dures requiring sophisticated instruments
    such as an organic carbon analyzer or an
    atomic  absorption unit.

  B Skills

    The degree of analytical skills required
    to perform the analyses likewise varies,
    as does the cost of having such analyses
    performed by service laboratories.
VII OTHER ANALYTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

 A Sample

    The importance of securing a representative
    sample of the type (grab or composite)
VIII   SUMMARY

   The October 16, 1973 Federal Register
   promulgates  guidelines establishing test
   procedures for the analysis of pollutants
   which might be required for certification
   (PL 92-500, section 401) or for permits
   (PL 92-500, section 402).  The issue lists
   page numbers in standard references where
   procedures can be found to measure the 71
   parameters listed.  It also sets forth the
   regulations for application to use methods
   not cited in the guidelines.  The measure-
   ments which must be made should be speci-
   fied by the agency requiring the data.
   Apparatus and professional skills to do the
   measurements will vary.  Representative
   samples, complete records and analytical
   quality control measures are all necessary
   elements for producing reliable data.
                                                                                        1-3

-------
Chemical Analyses
REFERENCES                                   3  Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water
                                                      and Wastes, 1971,  EPA,  MDQARL,
1  Standard Methods for the Examination of              Cincinnati, Ohio.
      Water and Wastewater, 13th ed.,  1971.
      APHA. New York, New York.
2  Annual Book of Standards, Part 23,  Water,     This outline was prepared by Audrey E.
      Atmospheric Analysis, 1972,  ASTM,        Donahue,  Chemist, National Training Center,
      Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania.                 MPOD, OWPO, USEPA,  Cincinnati, Ohio
                                                45268.

                                                Descriptors: Chemical analysis, chemical
                                                guidelines, self-monitoring requirements,
                                                non-approved analytical methods
  1-4

-------
           METHODOLOGY FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTEWATER
  I  INTRODUCTION

  This outline deals with chemical methods which
  are commonly performed in water quality
  laboratories.  Although a large number of
  constituents or properties may be of Interest
  to the analyst, many of the methods employed
  to measure them are based on the same
  analytical principles.  The purpose of this
  outline is to acquaint you with the principles
  involved in commonly-used chemical  methods
  to determine water quality.
 II  PRE-TREATMENTS

 For some parameters,  a preliminary treatment
 is required before the analysis begins.  These
 treatments serve various purposes.

 A Distillation - To isolate the constituent by
    heating a portion of the sample mixture to
    separate the more volatile part(s), and then
    cooling and condensing the resulting vapor(s)
    to recover the volatilized portion.

 B Extraction - To isolate/concentrate the
    constituent by shaking a portion of the •
    sample mixture with an  immiscible solvent
    in which the constituent  is much more
    soluble.

 C Filtration - To separate  undissolved matter
    from a sample mixture by passing a portion
    of it through a filter  of specified size.
    Particles  that are  dissolved in the original
    mixture are so small that they stay in the
    sample solution and pass through the filter,

 D Digestion  - To change constituents to a form
    amenable  to the specified test by heating a
    portion of the sample mixture with chemicals.
Ill  METERS

 For some parameters, meters have been
 designed to measure that specific constituent
 or property.
A  pH Meters

   pH (hydrogen ion concentration) is meas-
   ured as a difference in potential across a
   glass membrane which is in contact with
   the sample and with a reference solution.
   The sensor apparatus might be  combined
   into one probe or else it is divided into an
   indicating electrode (for the sample) and a
   reference electrode (for the reference
   solution). Before using,  the meter must
   be calibrated with a solution of known pM
   (a buffer) and then  checked for proper
   operation with a buffer of a different pH
   value.

B  Dissolved Oxygen Meters

   Dissolved oxygen meters measure the
   production of a current which is proportional
   to the amount of oxygen gas reduced at a
   cathode in the apparatus.  The oxygen gas
   enters the electrode through a membrane,
   and an electrolyte solution or gel  acts as a
   transfer and reaction media.  Prior to use
   the meter must be  calibrated against a known
   oxygen gas concentration.

C  Conductivity Meters

   Specific conductance is measured with a
   meter containing a Wheatstone bridge which
   measures the resistance of the sample
   solution to the transmission of an electric
   current.  The meter and cell are  calibrated
   accprding to the conductance of a  standard
   solution'of potassium chloride at 25 °C,
   measured by a "standard" cell with electrodes
   one cm square spaced one cm apart, This
   is why results are  called "specific" con-
   ductance,

D  Turbldimeters

   A turbidimeter compares the intensity of
   light  scattered by particles in the sample
   under defined conditions with the intensity
   of light scattered by a standard  reference
   suspension.
  CH. 14. 10.75
                                                                                     2-1

-------
 Methodology for Chemical Aanlysis of Water and Wastewater
IV  GENERAL ANALYTICAL METHODS

 A  Volumetric Analysis

    Titrations involve using a buret to measure
    the volume of a standard solution of a sub-
    stance required to completely react with
    the constituent of interest in a measured
    volume of sample.  One can then calculate
    the original concentration of the constituent
    of interest.

    There are various ways to detect the end
    point when the reaction is complete.

    1  Color change indicators

      The method may utilize an indicator which
      changes color when the reaction is
      complete.  For example,  in the Chemical
      Oxygen Demand Test  the indicator,
      ferrom,  gives a blue-green color to the
      mixture until the oxidation-reduction
      reaction is complete.   Then the mixture
      is reddish-brown.

      Several of these color-change titrations
      make use of the lodometric process
      whereby the constituent of interest quan-
      titatively releases free iodine.   Starch
      is added to give a blue color until enough
      reducing agent (sodium thiosulfate or
      phenylarsine oxide) is added to react
      with all the iodine.  At this end point,
      the mixture becomes colorless.

    2  Electrical property indicators

      Another  way to detect end points is a
      change in an electrical property of the
      solution when the reaction is complete.
      In the chlorine titration a cell containing
      potassium chloride will produce a small
      direct current as long as free chlorine
      is present.  As a reducing agent (phen-
      ylarsme oxide) is added to neutralize
      the chlorine, the microammeter which
      measures the existing direct current
      registers a lower reading on a scale.
      By observing the scale,  the end point of
      total neutralization of chlorine can be
      determined because the direct current
      ceases.
   3  Specified end points

      For acidity and alkalinity titrations, the
      end points are specified pH values for
      the final mixture.  The pH values are
      those existing when common acidity or
      alkalinity components have been  neutral-
      ized.  Thus acidity is determined by
      titrating the sample with a standard
      alkali to pH 8. 2 when carbonic acid
      would be neutralized to (CO3)~ .  Alka-
      linity (except for highly acidic samples)
      is  determined by titrating the sample
      with a standard acid to pH 4. 5 when the
      carbonate present has been converted
      to  carbonic acid.  pH meters are used to
      detect the specified end points.

B Gravimetric Procedures

   Gravimetric methods involve direct
   weighing of the constituent in a container.
   An empty container is weighed, the
   constituent is separated from the sample
   mixture and isolated in the container,  then
   the container with the constituent is weighed.
   The difference in the weights of the  container
   before and after containing the constituent
   represents the weight of the constituent.

   The type of container depends on the method
   used to separate the constituent from the
   sample mixture.  In the solids determinations,
   the container is  an  evaporating dish (total or
   dissolved) or a glass fiber filter disc in a
   crucible (suspended).  For oil and grease,
   the container is  a flask containing a residue
   after  evaporation of a solvent.

C Combustion

   Combustion means to add oxygen. In the
   Total Organic Carbon Analysis, combustion
   is used within an instrument to  convert
   carbonaceous material to carbon dioxide.
   An infrared analyzer measures the carbon
   dioxide.
V  PHOTOMETRIC METHODS

These methods involve the measurement of light
that is absorbed or transmitted quantitatively
  2-2

-------
                                   Methodology for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater.
either by the constituent of Interest or else by
a substance containing the constituent of Interest
which has resulted from some treatment of
the sample.  The quantitative aspect of these
photometric methods Is based on applying the
Lambert-Beer Law which established that the
amount of light absorbed Is quantitatively
related to the concentration of the absorbing
medium at a given wavelength and a given
thickness  of the medium through which the
light passes.

Each method requires preparing a set of
standard solutions containing known amounts
of the constituent of interest.  Photometric
values are obtained for the standards.  These
are used to draw a calibration (standard) curve
by plotting photometric values against the
concentrations.  Then, by locating the photo-
metric value for the sample on this standard
curve, the unknown concentration in the
sample can be determined.

A  Atomic Absorption

   Atomic Absorption (AA) Instruments utilize
   absorption of light of a characteristic wave-
   length.  This form of analysis Involves
   aspirating solutions of metal ions  (cations)
   or molecules containing metals  into a
   flame where they are reduced to individual
   atoms In a ground electrical state. In this
   condition, the atoms can absorb radiation
   of a wavelength characteristic for each
   element.  A lamp containing the element of
   interest as the cathode is used as  a source
   to emit the characteristic line spectrum for
   the element to be determined.

   The amount of energy  absorbed  is directly
   related to the concentration of the element
   of interest. Thus the  Lambert-Beer Law
   applies.  Standards can be prepared and
   tested and the resulting absorbance values
   can be used to construct a calibration
   (standard) curve. Then the absorbance
   value for the sample is located on this curve
   to determine the corresponding concentration.

   Once  the instrument is adjusted to give
   optimum readings for the element of interest,
   the testing of each solution can be done  in
   a matter of seconds.  Many laboratories
   wire recorders into their instruments to
   rapidly transcribe the data, thus conserving
   time spent on this aspect of the analysis.
   Atomic absorption techniques are generally
   used for metals and seml^metals in solution
   or else solubllized through some form of
   sample processing. For mercury, the  '
   principle Is utilized but the absorption of
   light occurs in a flameless situation with
   the .mercury in the vapor state and  contained
   In a closed glass cell.

B  Flame Emission

   Flame emission photometry Involves
   measuring the amount of light given off by
   atoms drawn into a flame. At certain
   temperatures, the flame raises the electrons
   in atoms to a higher' energy level.  When
   the electrons fall back to a lower energy
   level, the atoms lose (emit) radiant energy
   which can be detected and measured.

   Again standards must be prepared and
   tested to prepare a calibration (standard)
   curve.  Then'the transmission value of the
   sample can be located on the curve to
   determine its concentration.

   Many atomic absorption  instruments can be
   used for flame emission photometry.
   Sodium and potassium are very effectively
   determined by the emission technique.
   However, for many elements,  absorption
   analysis is more sensitive because there are
   a great number of unexcited atoms  in the
   flame which are available to  absorb the
   radiant energy.

C  Colorimetry

   Colorimetric analyses involve treating
   standards which contain  known concentrations
   of the constituent of interest and also the
   sample with reagents to  produce a colored
   solution,  The greater the concentration of
   the constituent,  the more intense will be
   the resulting color.

   The Lambert-Beer Law  which relates the
   absorption of light to the thickness  and
   concentration of the absorbing medium
   applies.  Accordingly, a spectrophotometer
   is.used to measure the amount of light of
   appropriate wavelength which is absorbed
   by the same thickness of each solution.
                                                                                     2-3

-------
 Methodology for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater
    The results from the standards are used to
    construct a calibration (standard) curve.
    Then the absorbance value for the sample
    is located on this curve to determine the
    corresponding concentration.

    Many of the metals and several other
    parameters (phosphorus,  ammonia, nitrate,
    nitrite,  etc. ) are determined  in this
    manner.
VI  GAS-LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY

 Chromatography techniques involve a separa-
 tion of the components in a mixture by using
 a difference in the physical properties of the
 components.   Gas-Liquid Chromatography
 (GLC) involves separation based on a differ-
 ence in the properties of volatility and  solu-
 bility.  The method is used to determine
 algicides, chlorinated organic compounds
 and pesticides.

 The sample is introduced into an injector
 block which is at a high temperature (e. g.
 210°C), causing the liquid sample to volatilize.
 An inert carrier gas transports the sample
 components through a liquid held in place as
 a thin film on an inert solid support material
 in a column.

 Sample components pass through the column
 at a speed partly governed by the relative
 solubility  of each in the stationary liquid.
 Thus the least soluble components  are the
 first to reach the detector. The type of
 detector used depends on the class of compounds
 involved.  All detectors  function to sense and
 measure the quantity of each sample component
 as it comes off the column.  The detector
 signals a recorder system which registers
 a response.

 As with other  instrumental methods, standards
 with known concentrations of the substance of
 interest are measured on the instrument.  A
 calibration (standard) curve can be developed
 and the concentration in  a sample can be
 determined from this graph.

 Gas-liquid Chromatography methods are very
 sensitive (nanogram, picogram quantities) so
 only small amounts of  samples are required.
 On the other hand, this extreme sensitivity
 oiten necessitates extensive clean-up of
 samples prior to GLC  analysis.
  2-4
 VII  AUTOMATED METHODS

  The increasing number of samples and
  measurements to be made in water quality
  laboratories has stimulated efforts to automate
  these analyses. Using smaller amounts of
  sample (semi-micro techniques),  combining
  reagents for fewer measurements per analysis,
  and using automatic dispensers are all means
  of saving analytical time.

  However, the term "automated laboratory
  procedures" usually means automatic intro-
  duction of the sample into the instrument,
  automatic treatment of the sample to test for
  a component of interest,  automatic recording
  of data and,  increasingly, automatic  calculating
  and print-out of data.   Maximum automation
  systems involve continuous sampling direct
  from the source (e.g.  an in-place probe) with
  telemetering of results to a central computer.

  Automated methods, especially those based on
  colonmetric methodology,  are recognized for
  several water quality parameters including
  alkalinity,  ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, phosphorus,
  and hardness.
VIII  SOURCES OF PROCEDURES

  Details of the procedure for an individual
  measurement can be found in reference books.
  There are three particularly-recognized books
  of procedures for water quality measurements
  A Standard Methods(1)
     The American Public Health Association,
     the American Water Works Association
     and the Water Pollution Contro] Federation
     prepare and publish "Standard Methods for
     the Examination of Water and Wastewater. "

     As indicated by the list of publishers, this
     book contains methods developed for use by
     those interested in water or wastewater
     treatment.

   B ASTM Standards(2)  '

     The American Society for Testing and
     Materials publishes an "Annual Book of
     ASTM Standards" containing specifications
     and methods for testing materials.  The
     "book" currently consists of 47 parts.

-------
                                   Methodology for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater
    The part applicable to water was formerly
    Part 23.  It is now Part 31.

    The methods are chosen by approval of the
    membership of ASTM and are Intended to
    aid industry,  government agencies and the
    general public. Methods are applicable to
    industrial waste waters as well as to other
    types of water samples.

 C  EPA Methods Manual(3)

    The United States Environmental Protection
    Agency publishes  a manual of "Methods for
    Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. "

    EPA developed this manual to provide
    methodology for monitoring the quality of
    our Nation's waters and to determine the
    impact of waste discharges.   The test pro-
    cedures were carefully selected to meet
    these needs, using Standard Methods and
    ASTM as basic references.  In  many cases,
    the EPA manual contains completely
    described procedures because they modified
    methods from the basic references.  Other-
    wise, the manual  cites page numbers in
    the two references where the analytical
    procedures can be found.  '
IX ACCURACY AND PRECISION

 A Of the Method

   One of the criteria for choosing methods
   to be used for water quality analysis is that
   the  method should .measure the desired
   property or constituent with precision,
   accuracy,  and specificity sufficient to meet
   data needs. Standard references, then,
   include a  statement of the precision and
   accuracy  for the method which is obtained
   when (usually) several analysts in different
   laboratories used the particular method.

 B Of the Analyst

   Each analyst should check his own precision
   and accuracy as a test of his skill in per-
   forming a test.  According to the U.  S. EPA
   Handbook  for Analytical Quality Control^4),
   he can do  this in the following manner.
   To check precision, the analyst should
   analyze samples with four different
   concentrations of the  constituent of interest,
   seven times each. The study should cover
   at least two hours of normal laboratory
   operations to allow changes in conditions
   to affect the results.  Then he should
   calculate the standard deviation of each of
   the sets' of seven results and compare his
   values for the lowest  and highest concen-
   trations tested with the standard deviation
   value published/for that method in the reference
   book.  An individual should have better values
   than  those averaged from the work of several
   analysts.

   To check accuracy, he can use two of the
   samples used to check precision by adding
   a known amount  (spike) of the particular
   constituent in quantities to double the lowest
   concentration used, and to bring an inter-
   mediate concentration to approximately 75%
   of the upper limit of application of the
   method.  He then analyzes each of the spiked
   samples seven times, then calculates the
   average of each  set of seven results.  To
   calculate accuracy in terms of % recovery,
   he will also need to calculate the average of
   the results he got when he analyzed the
   unspiked samples.  Then:
% Recovery =
                  Avg. of Spiked
Avg. of
Amt.  of
                Unspiked   ' Spike
X  100
   Again, the individual's % "recovery should be
   better than the published figure derived from
   the results of several analysts.

C  Of Daily Performance

   Even after an analyst has demonstrated his
   personal skill in performing the analysis,
   a daily check on precision and accuracy
   should be  done.  About one in every ten
   samples should be a duplicate to check
   precision  and about one in every ten samples
   should be  spiked to check accuracy.

   It is also beneficial to participate in inter-
   laboratory quality control programs.  The
   U. S.  EPA provides reference samples at
   no change  to laboratories.  These samples
                                                                                       2-5

-------
 Methodology for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater
   serve as independent checks on reagents,
   instruments or techniques; for training
   analysts or for comparative  analyses within
   the laboratory.  There is no certification
   or other formal evaluative function resulting
   from their use.
X SELECTION OF ANALYTICAL
   PROCEDURES

Standard sources**' ^' ^' will, for most
parameters, contain  more than one analytical
procedure.  Selection of the procedure to be
used in a specific instance involves consider-
ation of the use to be made  of the data.  In
some cases, one must use specified procedures.
In others, one may be able  to choose among
several methods.

A NPDES Permits and State Certifications

   A specified analytical procedure must be
   used when  a waste constituent is measured:

   1  For an application for a National Pollutant
      Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
      permit under Section  402 of the Federal
      Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA),
      as amended.

   2  For reports required to be submitted by
      dischargers under NPDES.

   3  For certifications issued by States
      pursuant to Section 401 of the FWPCA,
      as amended.

   Analytical procedures to be used in these
   situations must conform to those specified
   in Title 40,  Chapter 1, Part 136, of the
   Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).   The
   listings in the CFR usually cite two different
   procedures for a particular measurement.
   The CFR also provides a system of applying
   to the EPA Regional Administrator for
   permission to use  methods not cited in the
   CFR.

B  Ambient Water Quality Monitoring

   For Ambient Water Quality Monitoring,
   analytical procedures have not been
   specified by regulations.  However,  the
    selection of procedures to be used should
    receive attention.  Use of those listed in
    the CFR is strongly recommended.  If
    any of the data obtained is going to be used
    in connection with NPDES permits,  or may
    be used as evidence  in a legal proceeding,
    use of procedures listed in the CFR is
    again strongly recommended.
XI  FIELD KITS

 Field kits have been devised to perform
 analyses outside of the laboratory.  The kit
 may contain equipment and reagents for only
 one test or for a variety of measurements.
 It may be purchased or put together by an
 agency to serve its particular needs.

 Since such kits are devised  for performing
 tests with minimum time and maximum
 simplicity, the types of labware and reagents
 employed usually differ significantly from the
 equipment and supplies used to perform the
 same measurement in  a laboratory.

 A Shortcomings

    Field conditions do  not accommodate the
    equipment and services required for pre-
    treatments like distillation and digestion.
    Nor is it practical to  carry and use calibrated
    glassware like burets,and volumetric pipets.
    Other problems are preparation, transport
    and storage of high  quality reagents, of
    extra supplies required to test for  and remove
    sample interferences before making the
    measurement, and  of instruments which
    are very sensitive in  detecting particular
    constituents. One just cannot carry and
    set up laboratory facilities in  the field which
    are equivalent to stationary analytical
    facilities.

 B NPDES Permits and State Certification

    Kit methods that thus deviate from standard  '
    laboratory procedures are not approved for
    obtaining data required for NPDES permits
    or Sta,te construction  certifications.  If one
    judges that such a method is justifiable for
    these purposes,  he  must apply to the EPA
    Regional Administrator for permission to
    use it.
 2-6

-------
                                  Methodology for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastewater
 C Uses

   Even though the results of field tests are
   usually not as accurate and precise as those
   performed in the laboratory,  such tests do
   have a place in water quality programs.

   In situations where only an estimate of the
   concentrations of various constituents is
   required,  field tests serve well.  They are
   invaluable sources of information for
   planning a full-scale sampling/testing
   program when decisions must be made
   regarding location of sampling sites,
   schedule of sample collection,  dilution of
   samples required for analysis, and treat-
   ment of samples required to remove inter-
   ferences to analyses.
   Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water
      and Wastes.  J974.  U. S. EPA. EMSL.
      Cincinnati,  OH 45268.

   Analytical Quality Control in Water and
   Wastewater Laboratories.  1972.  U. S. EPA,
   EMSL, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
REFERENCES

1  Standard Methods for the Examination of
      Water and Wastewater,  13th  Edition.
      1971.  APHA-AWWA-WPCF, 1790
      Broadway,  New York, NY 10019.

2  1974 Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
      Part 31, Water.  ASTM, 1916 Race
      Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
This outline was prepared by A. E.  Donahue,
Chemist,  National Training Center, MPOD,.
OWPO, USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio  45268.
Descriptors.  Analysis,  Chemical Analysis,
Methodology,  Wastewater, Water Analysis
                                                                                       2-7

-------
                   SAMPLE HANDLING - FIELD THROUGH LABORATORY
 I  PLANNING A SAMPLING PROGRAM

 A Factors to Consider:

   1  Locating sampling sites

   2  Sampling equipment

   3  Type of sample require'd

      a  grab
      b  composite

   4  Amount of  sample required

   5  Frequency of collection

   6  Preservation measures,  if any

 B Decisive Criteria

   1  Nature of the sample source

   2  Stability of constituent(s) to be measured

   3  Ultimate use of data


II  REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES

   If a sample is to provide meaningful and
   valid data about the parent population,  it
   must be representative of the conditions
   existing in that parent source at the
   sampling location.

 A The  container should be rinsed two or
   three times with the water to oe collected.

 B Compositjng Samples

   1  For  some sources,  a composite of
      samples is made which will represent
      the average situation for  stable
      constituents.

   2  The nature of the constituent to be
      determined may require a series  of
      separate samples.
 C  The equipment used to collect the sample '.
    is an important factor to consider.
    ASTM*1' has a detailed section on various
    sampling devices and techniques.

 D  Great care must be exercised when
    collecting samples in sludge or mud areas
    and near benthic deposits.  No definite
    procedure can be given, but careful
    effort should be made to obtain a rep-
    resentative sample.
Ill  SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION '

 A  Each sample must be unmistakably
    identified, preferably with a tag, or label.
    The required information should be planned
    in advance.

 B  An information form preprinted on the
    tags or labels provides uniformity of
    sample records, assists the' sampler, and
    helps ensure that vital information will
    not be omitted.

 C  Useful Identification Information includes:

    1 sample identity code
    2 signature of sampler
    3 signature of witness
    4 description of sampling location de-
      tailed enough to accommodate repro-
      ducible sampling.  (It may be more
      convenient to record the details in the
      field record book).
    5 sampling equipment used
    6 date of collection
    7 time  of collection
    8 type of sample  (grab or composite)
    9 water temperature
   10 sampling conditions such as weather,
      water level, flow rate of source,  etc.
   11 any preservative additions  or techniques
   12 record of any determinations done in
      the field
   13 type of analyses to be dene in laboratory
 WP.SUll.sg.6.3.74
                                     3-1

-------
 Sample Handling - Field Through Laboratory
IV  SAMPLE CONTAINERS

 A  Available Materials

    1  glass
    2  plastic
    3  hard rubber

 B  Considerations

    1  Nature of the sample  - Organics
       attack polyethylene.

    2  Nature of constituent s) to be determined
       - Cations can adsorb readily on some
       plastics and on certain glassware.
       Metal or aluminum foil cap  liners can
       interfere with metal analyses.

    3  Preservatives to be used - Mineral
       acids attack some  plastics,

    4  Mailing Requirements - Containers
       should be large enough to allow extra
       volume for effects of temperature
       changes during transit.  All caps
       should be securely in place. Glass
       containers  must be protected against
       breakage.  Styrofoam linings are
       useful for protecting glassware.

 C  Preliminary Check

    Any question of possible interferences
    related to the  sample container should
    be resolved before the study begins.  A
    preliminary check should be made using
    corresponding sample materials,  con-
    tainers, preservatives and analysis.

 D  Cleaning

    If new  containers are to be used, prelim-
    inary, cleaning is usually not necessary.

    If the sample containers have been used
    previously, they should be carefully
    cleaned before use.

    There  are several cleaning methods
    available.  Choosing the best method in-
    volves  careful consideration of the nature
    of the sample  and of the constituent(s) to
    be  determined.
   1 Phosphate detergents should not be
     used to clean containers for phosphorus
     samples.

   2 Traces of dichromate cleaning solution
     will interfere with metal analyses.

E  Storage

   Sample containers should be stored and
   transported in a manner to assure their
   readiness for use.
V  SAMPLE PRESERVATION

   Every effort should be made to achieve
   the shortest possible interval between
   sample collection and analyses.  If there
   must be a delay and it is long enough to
   produce significant changes in the  sample,
   preservation measures are required.

   At best, however,  preservation efforts
   can only retard changes that inevitably
   continue after the sample is removed
   from the parent population.

A  Functions

   Methods of preservation are relatively
   limited.  The primary functions of those
   employed are:

   1 to retard biological action
   2 to retard precipitation or the hydrolysis
     of chemical compounds and complexes
   3 to reduce volatility of constituents

B  General Methods

   1 pH control - This'affects precipitation
     of metals, salt  formation and can
     inhibit bacterial action.
   2  Chemical Addition - The choice of
      chemical depends on the change to be
      controlled.

      Mercuric chloride is commonly used
      as a bacterial inhibitor.  Disposal of
      the mercury-containing samples is a
      problem and efforts to find a substitute
      for this toxicant are underway.
    3-2

-------
                                                              niruuKti
      To dispose of solutions of Inorganic
      mercury salts, a recommended
      procedure Is to capture and retain the
      mercury salts as the Sulfide at a high
      pH.  Several firms have tentatively
      agreed to accept the mercury sulflde for
      re-processing after preliminary con-
      ditions are
       Refrigeration and Freezing - This Is
       the best preservation technique avail-
       able, but it is not applicable to all
       types of samples.  It Is not always a
       practical technique for field operations.
 C  Specific Methods
                           ,(2)
    The EPA Methods Manual    Includes a
    table summarizing the holding times and
    preservation techniques for several
    analytical procedures.  This Information
    also can be found in the standard refer-
    ences U|2, 3) as part Of the presentation
    of the individual procedures.
VI  METHODS OF ANALYSIS

    Standard reference books of analytical
    procedures to determine the physical
    and chemical characteristics of various
    types of water samples are available.

 A  EPA Methods Manual

    The Methods Development and Quality
    Assurance Research Laboratory of the
    Environmental Protection Agency, has
    published a manual of analytical procedures
    to provide methodology for monitoring the
    quality of our Nation's Waters and to deter-
    mine the impact of waste discharges,  The
    title of this manual is "Methods for Chem-
    cal Analysis of Water and Wastes. "<2)

    For some procedures, the analyst is
    referred to Standard Methods and/or to
    ASTM Standards.

 B  Standard Methods

    The American Public Health Association,
    the American Water Works Association
    and the Water Pollution Control Federation
     prepare and publish a volume describing
     methods of water analysis.  These include
     physical and chemical procedures.  The
     title of this.book is "Standard Methods
     for the Examination of Water and Waste -
     water. "<3>

 C   ASTM Standards  .

     The American Society for Testing and
     Materials publishes an annual "book"
     of specifications and methods for testing
     materials. The "book" currently con-
     sists of 33 parts. The part applicable
     to water is a book titled,  "Annual Book of
     ASTM Standards, Part 23f Water;
     Atmospheric Analysis".(I'

 D   Other References

     Current literature and other books of
     analytical procedures with related in-
     formation are available to the analyst.

 E  NPDES, Methodology

    When gathering data for National Pollutant
    Discharge Elimination System report
    purposes,  the analyst must consult the
    Federal Register for a listing of approved
    analytical methodology.  There he will be
    directed to pages in the above cited
    reference books where acceptable pro-
    cedures can be found.  The Federal
    Register also provides information con-
    cerning the protocol for obtaining approval
    to use analytical procedures other than
    those listed,
VII  ORDER OF ANALYSES

     The ideal situation is to perform all
     analyses shortly after sample collection.
     In the practical order, this is rarely
     possible.  The allowable holding time
     for preserved samples is the basis
     for scheduling analyses.
                                                                                    3-3

-------
  Sample Handling - Field Through Laboratory
 A   The allowable holding time for samples
     depends on the nature of the  sample, the
     stability of the constituent(s) to be de-
     termined and the conditions of storage.

     1  For some constituents and physical
        values,  immediate determination is
        required, e.g. dissolved  oxygen, pH.

     2  Using preservation techniques, the
        holding times -for other determinations
        range from 6 hours (BOD) to 7 days
        (COD).  Metals may be held up to 6
         months. ^)
                                 /0\
     3  The EPA Methods Manual   includes
        a table summarizing holding times and
        preservation techniques for several
        analytical procedures.  This information
        can also be found in the standard
                   (123)
        references  ' '   as part of the
        presentation of the individual
        procedures.

     4  If dissolved concentrations  are
        sought,  filtration should be done in
        the field if at all possible.  Other-
        wise, the sample is  filtered as soon
        as it is  received in the laboratory.
        A 0.45 micron membrane filter is
        recommended for reproducible
        filtration.

 B   The time interval between collection
     and analysis is important and should be
     recorded in the laboratory record book.
VIII  RECORD KEEPING

     The importance of maintaining a bound,
     legible record of pertinent information
     on samples cannot be over-emphasized.

 A   Field Operations

     A bound  notebook  should be used. Informa-
     tion that should be recorded includes:
    1  Sample identification records (See
       Part HI)

    2  Any information requested by the
       analyst as significant

    3  Details of sample preservation

    4  A complete record of data on any
       determinations done in the field.
       (See B, next)

    5  Shipping details and records

B   Laboratory Operations

    Samples  should be logged in as soon as
    received and the analyses performed
    as soon as possible.

    A bound notebook should be used.
    Preprinted data forms provide uniformity
    of records and help ensure that required
    information will be recorded. Such sheets
    should be permanently bound.

    Items in the laboratory notebook would
    include:

    1  sample identifying code
    2  date  and  time  of collection
    3  date and time of analysis
    4  the analytical method used
    5  any deviations from the analytical
       method used and why this was done
    6  data obtained during analysis
    7  results of quality control checks on the
       analysis
    8  any information useful to those who
       interpret and use the data
    9  signature  of the analyst
   3-4

-------
                                               Sample Handling - Field Through Laboratory
IX  SUMMARY

 Valid data can be obtained only from a repre-
 sentative sample,  unmistakably identified,
 carefully collected and stored.  A skilled
 analyst, using approved methods of analyses
 and performing the determinations within
 the prescribed time limits, can produce data
 for the sample. This data will be of value
 only if  a written record exists to verify sample
 history from the field through the laboratory.

     REFERENCES

 1   ASTM Standards, Part 23, Water;
       Atmospheric Analysis.

 2   Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water
       and Wastes, EPA-MDQARL,
       Cincinnati,  OH  45268, 1974.

 3   Standard Methods for the Examination of
       Water and Wastewater, 13th edition,
       APHA-AWWA-WPCF,  1971.
   Dean, R., Williams, R. and Wise, R.,
     Disposal of Mercury Wastes from
     Wafer Laboratories, Environmental
     Science and Technology, October,  1971.
This outline was prepared by A.  Donahue,
Chemist, National Training Center, MPOD,
OWPO, EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio  45268.
Descriptors; On-Site Data Collections,
On-Site Investigations, Planning, Handling,
Sample, Sampling, Water Sampling,
Surface Waters, Preservation, Wastewater
                                                                                      3-5

-------
                      ATOMIC ABSORPTION  SPECTROPHOTOMETRY
 I   INTRODUCTION

    Atomic absorption speetroscopy has been
    well known to physicists and astronomers
    for more than  100 years.  In 1850,  Kirchoff
    look light from the sun and collimated it
    with a lens through the flame of an ordinal y
    laboratory burner, and then passed the
    light through a prism which disperse'.! it
    into the  characteristic visible spectrum
    with which we  are .ill familiar.  He then
    took .1 platinum spoon containing a sodium
    salt ana introduced Jt into the flame.  He.
    observed that the yellow light that was
    present  in the  spectrum disappeared .ind
    in its place appeared the characteristic
    resonance lines of sodium.  Since then
    astronomers have used the technique  to
    detect and measure the concentration of
    metals in the vapors of stars   In 19f>r!,
    Walsh'  recognized us potential  advantage
    over emission sppctroscopy for trace
    metal  analysis.  He designed and built an
    analytically useful atomic absorption
    instrument. Shortly thereafter the ad-
    vantages of atomic absorption instrumen-
    tation  were iec,ugmzed in the United States.

II   THEORY

    The basis  of the method is the measurement
    of the  light absorbed at the wavelength of a
    resonance line by the  unexcited atoms of
    the element.  Elements not themselves
    excited to  emission by a flame may be
    determined in a flame by absorption pro-
    vided that  the atomic state is capable of
    existence.
    At the temperature of a normal air-
    acetylene flame (2100 C) only about one
    per cent of all atoms is excited to emission
    in A flame; therefore absorption due to a
    transition  from the ground electronic
    state to a higher energy level is virtually
    an absolute measure of the number of atoms
    in tht flame, and  the concentration of the
    element  in the  sample.  Electrons will
    absorb energy  at the same characteristic
    wavelength at which they emit energy.
    This is the principle upon which the tech-
    nique of  atomic absorption spectroacopy
    is based.
     Tiie advantages of ...totrv.i- absorption
     speetroscopy as compared tu r-n ission
     speetroscopy are  (1)  tiut attw ic
     absorption is independent of tht1 excitation
     potential of the transition involved <>nd
     (2)  that it is less subject to temperature
     variation and interference froir, extraneous
     radiation and interference from extraneous
     radiation or energy exchange between
     atoms.
     Atomic absorption analytical apparatus
     (Fujure  1) consists of a suitable source
     of light emitting the line specti um of  ui
     element, a device for vaponzrig the
     shmpJe, a means of line isolation
     (rnonochomator or lilter) and pnoto-
     tlectric detecting .ind measur.ng 
-------
                           VAPORIZING   '40NOCHROM/HOR
                   ROTATING  SYSTEM
                   CHOPPER
                                      SLI;
                                                             PHOTO-
                                                           OETECTOR
                  AMPLt  *M  FUEL«N
  ELECTRONICS
      AND
    READOUT
!    I'
                 ',!'.<•  .' \i. i. tl d
                  >) i •, i'j- d
                  . b "U (  sen1" I
                 'itcUmiM; OHf; l)f
                 I'K .IP})' f-pr inti1
                  th" U .-- •
                         nito
i, ti nei s f..ui IH c A )t> iified a-

l  I Ot_£)i-c,O,l&\rniptlOv

   Those >hicb ratrc  cc t'l-- &jtip.
  f.pray ditocliy  ml J ini1 >M i •
  (Figurf 2)
,,,(>d o! • ' hue'.
"1C ni I e
i ' i f >< n
i u> 1 i on "••
v 1. ll'
r ;1 . pii1 -
' f --1. .1*
/




1



r
j
L
-— *_
. 1 1- '..1 '.' •',.
f tl } .' U3£
. jciJ fi'^'^tjonf
1

i
t
r
i —





                                                        IT!
                                                                pun.
                                                          ^ 	oxvG
                                             SAMPLE
                                                     KI -I'RE 2

-------
                                                  Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
  b  Premix
     Those which introduce the spray into
     a condensing chamber for removing
     large droplets.  (Figure 3)

   Flame shape is important.  The flame
   should have a long path length (but a
   narrow width, such as a fishtail flame)
   so that  the source traverses an increased
   number of atoms capable of contributing
   to the absorption signal.

   The effective length of the flame may
   be increased by multiple passages
   through the  flame with a reflecting
   mirror system, or by alignment of
   several burners in series.
   The flame temperature need only be
   high enough to dissociate molecular
   compounds into the free metal atoms.
Typical flame temperatures are shown
in Table I.

              Table I
     Fuel-Oxidant
Approximate
Temp., °C
  Nitrous Oxide - acetylene       3000

  Hydrogen - an                2100

  Hydrogen - oxygen       2700 - 2800

  Acetylene - oxygen             3100

  Acetylene - air          2000 - 2200

  Propane - oxygen        2700 - 2800

  Illuminating gas - oxygen         2800

  Cyanogen - oxygen             4900
                                                                 FLAME
      AUXILIARY
          AIR
•L
1 ORIFICE
,


CAPILLAR
        ASPIRATING
             AIR
                                                           *
                                              SPOILERS
                     \
               MIXING CHAMBER
                                                                                         •-•>-
                    DRAIN
                                      Figure 3

-------
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
C  Line Isolation

   1  The use of a line spectrum of the ele-
      ment being determined, rather than a
      continuous spectrum, makes possible
      the use of monochromators of low
      resolving power or even filters.  When
      a spectral lamp is used as a  light source,
      it is only necessary to isolate the
      resonance line  from neighboring lines
      of the light source or vaporized sample.
      The resolution  of the method is implicit
      in the width of the emission and absorp-
      tion lines.

   2  To realize the full potentialities of the
      method,  the strongest absorption line
      must be used.  For elements with
      simple spectra, the resonance line
      arising from  the lowest excited state is
      usually the line exhibiting strongest
      absorption.

   3  Calibration curves  depart from linearity
      at much lower concentrations in absorp-
      tion work as compared with emission
      work.  Curvature results partly from
      mci eased pressure broadening  s the
      concentration of salt rises,  but also
      depends on source characteristics,
      particularly self-absorption, and on
      the nature and homogeneity of the flame.

D  Detection

   1  Photo-electric  detectors used in atomic
      absorption analysis need be no more
      sensitive than those used in emission
      analysis, since in the atomic absorption
      method,  concentration of an element is
      determined by measuring the reduction
      in intensity of the resonance  line emitted
      from a source of high intensity.

   2  Single or double-beam circuits may be
      adopted for work with a single beam
      instrument, results are directly depend-
      ent upon source and detector stability.
      Both must be  powered by separate
      power supplies. In a double-beam
      system small variations in the source
      signal are compensated automatically.
IV   EVALUATION

 A  Sensitivity

     1  For an air-acetylene flame of length
       2 or 3 cm the lower limits of detection
       of elements having low resonance-line
       excitation potential (eg Na-K) are
       approximately equal in a single-beam
       atomic absorption and emission methods.

     2  For elements having highly reversed
       resonance lines or resonance lines of
       high excitation potential, the atomic-
       absorption method has  decided
       advantages over emission methods.
       Examples of elements in these categories
       are Zn,  Mg, Fe and Mn.

     3  A  disadvantage of the atomic-absorption
       method,  when  compared with flame
       emission,  is the lack of a quick and
       simple method of varying sensitivity
       to deal with solutions of widely varying
       element  concentrations.  The sensitivity
       of an atomic-absorption instrument is
       determined almost entirely by flame
       characteristics,  notably length of light
       path through the flame.

     4  A  comparison  of sensitivity  obtained by
       emission and adsorption techniques is
       given in  Table II.

 B  Precision

     1  Precision of a single-beam atomic
       absorption instrument is primarily a
       function  of the stability of light output
       from the spectral lamp.  This in turn
       is dependent on the stability of the main
       supply and inherent stability of the lamp.
       The largest fluctuations are only + 2
       percent  for the hollow cathode tube and
       sodium spectral vapor  lamp.  A  double-
       beam instrument significantly reduces
       this error.

     2  In common with flame-emission methods,
       atomic absorption is subject to "noise"
       from the flame and the detector.   Changes
       in absorption caused by fluctuations in

-------
                                                    Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
      Element
                       Sensitivity mg/1
                    Flume        A, A
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Bismuth
Cadmium
Calcium
Cesium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Gallium
Gold
Imdlum
Iron
Lead
Lithium
Magnesium
Manganuse
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Palladium
Platinum
Potassium
Rhodium
Rubidium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Strontium
Tellurium
Titanium
Thallium
Tin
Vanadium
Zinc
2


0.3
25

2
0.003

0. 1

0.01



0.2
2
0.002
0. 1
0.01
10




0,001



O.OS
0.002
0.01





200
0.5
0.2
1.0
1.0
0.05
0.2
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.15
0.005
1.0
0. 1
0.5
0.05
0.15
0.005
0.003
0.01
0.5
0.2
0,05
1.0
0.5
0.005
0.3
0.02
1.0
0.02
0.005
0.02
0.5
1,0
0.2
2.0
0.5
0.005
                  Table II
     flame temperature are much less than
     those in emission because the strength
     of the absorption line is principally
     dependent on Doppler width whereas
     the intensity of emission from the flame
     is much more sensitive to temperature.

C  Accuracy

   This ia shown by the  typos of interference
   found in flame emission and atomic ab-
   sorption speetroseopy,  There are three
   types:
   1  Physical

     Collision of atoms and electrons or
     atoms and molecules will transfer
     energy thus causing an enhancement or
     depression of analysis-line emission.
   This has a large effect on flame
   emission analysis but has only a
   negligible effect on atomic absorption.
            *it
2  Radiative

   Light from elements other than the one
   being measured pass the  line isolating
   device (monochromator or filter).  This
   occurs in flame emission work, for
   example, the interference of calcium
   and magnesium in sodium determinations.
   This interference is also encountered
   in atomic absorption using a D. C.
   system but is very small because of the
   large signal from the hollow-cathode
   tube.  Radiative interference is elimina-
   ted in anA.C. system.

3  Chemical

   Emission from an element in the flame
   is depressed by the formation of com-
   pounds,  which are not dissociated at
   flame temperatures.  This also affects
   absorption because the formation of
   temperature - stable compounds  in the
   flame causes proportionate  reduction
   in the population of ground-state and
   excited atoms.

   Investigations to date suggest chemical
   interference is confined,  almost
   entirely, to the alkaline-earth elements
   and that  calcium absorption is more sub-
   ject to this interference than is magne-
   sium absorption.
   Typical  calibration curves are ohown
   in'Figure 5.
                                                       50    100   150    200   250    300   3SO   400
                                                                   METAL, ppb

                                                                 Figure 5               ....

-------
  Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
  V  REMOVAL OF INTERFERENCES AND
     CONCENTRATION OF SAMPLE

  A  Removal of Interferences

     1  The methods for overcoming these inter-
       ferences in atomic absorption are similar
       to those used in flame emission, namely,
       either separation of interfering ions or
       suppression of the interference by ad-
       dition in excess of a substance that will
       prevent formation of compounds between
       interfering ions and the element being
       determined.

  B  Concentration of Sample

     1  Organic separations can be used to
       concentrate a sample.  Interferences
       are removed, as seen above, and also
       the organic solvent enhances the absorp-
       tion.

     2  Ion exchange has also been used success-
       fully for concentrating samples for atomic
       absorption.
 VI CONCLUSIONS

  Atomic absorption methods are as good
  as or better than emission methods, for
  elements to which they can both be applied,
  in sensitivity,  precision and accuracy.
  They can be applied to a far wider range
  of elements than can emission analysis.
  The additional cost of hollow cathode dis-
  charge tubes is compensated by the greater
  range  of analyses and greater  reliability
  of results.
VII INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE

 A Perkin Elmer

    1  Model 303 - double beam, AC -$5, 920. 00

    1  Model 290 - single beam, AC -$2,900.00

 B Beckman attachments for existing
    spectrophotometers

    1  Use with model D. U. andD.U.-2-
       smgle beam, DC - $2, 135.00

 4-6
   2  Use with model D. B. - single beam,
      AC - $2,495.00

C  Jarrell-Ash

   1  Dual atomic absorption flame spectrometer-
      single beam, AC  - $5, 800. 00

D  E.E. L.

   1  Atomic absorption spectrophotometer -
      single beam, AC  - $2,850.00
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Certain portions of this outline contain
training meterial from a prior outline by
Nathan C. Malof.
REFERENCES

1  Walsh, A.  Spectrochim.  Acta.  7,  108.
      1955.

2  Kahn, Herbert and Slavin, Walter.  Atomic
      Absorption Analysis.  International
      Science  and Technology.  November 1962.

3  David, D. J. The Application of Atomic
      Absorption to Chemical Analysis.  The
      Analyses. 85:779-791.  1960.

4  Platte, J. A., and Marcy, V. M.  A New
      Tool for Water Chemicals.  Industrial
      Engineering.   May 1965.

5  Biechler, D. G.   Determination of Trace
      Copper,  Lead, Zinc, Cadmium,  Nickel,
      and Iron in Industrial Waste Water by
      Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
      After  Ion Exchange on Dorvex A-l.
      Analytical Chemistry,  37-1054-1055.  1965.

6  Elwell, W.  T., and Gidley,  J.A.F.  Atomic-
      absorption Spectrophotometry. The Mac-
      Millan Company.  New York.  1962.

7  Willard,  H.H., Merritt, L. L., and Dean,
      J. A.  Instrumental Methods of Analysis.
      D. Van No strand Co.. Inc. N.Y.  1965.

This outline was prepared by P. F. Hallbach,
Chemist,  National Training Center, MOTD,
OWPQ. USEPA. Cincinnati. Ohio  45268.
Descriptors:  Analytical Techniques,  Atomic
Absorption,  Instrumental Analysis, Metals
Analysis

-------
              ENERGY SOURCES FOR ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY
I  INTRODUCTION

The basic principle behind atomic absorption
spectroscopy can be said to be opposite that
of emission methods.  In emission spectro-
scopy the sample is raised to a meta stable
excited energy level by an input of energy.
Then the sample is allowed to return to its
stable ground state.  When the sample returns
to its ground state energy is given off and a
high proportion of this energy is at a wave-
length characteristic of the  metal in the sample
that is being analyzed.

In atomic absorption the element under inves-
tigation is not excited but is merely dissociated
from its chemical bonds, and in an unexcited
ground state.  It is then capable of absorbing
radiation at a characteristic wavelength,  i. e.,
the same wavelength as would be emitted  if
the element were excited.

This difference affects both the sensitivity
and stability of results obtained in analyzing
for elements via atomic  absorption.  Due to
the fact that, even at optimum conditions  in
emission spectroscopy,  for every atom avail-
able in an excited state there are many more
available in the unexcited state.  For example,
for every calcium atom in the excited state
there are about a thousand dissociated and
accessible to atomic absorption.  For zinc the
ratio is even greater, tor every one atom that
is excited there are 10   available for atomic
absorption.
These numbers do not indicate a direct pro-
portional increase in sensitivity.  Some increase
is noticed but not as large as the numbers
indicate.  In addition to the  sensitivity increase,
an increase in the  stability is also obtained.
If during analysis of zinc by emission spec-
troscopy a change  in flame would make available
another atom, a change of 100% in the emission
value has occurred but the change in atomic
absorption would not be significant.

In order to provide energy that the unexcited
atoms are capable of absorbing, a hollow
cathode lamp is used in atomic absorption.
Hollow cathode lamps are manufactured by
several firms and the shape of the lamp has
little to do with its function.  Basically,  a
hollow cathode lamp is composed of an-anode,
cathode, shielding, envelope, end window and
a filler gas.

To provide energy at the specific wavelength
needed for the element under analysis the hollow
cathode lamp has its cathode constructed from
or lined with the element of interest usually in
the shape of a cylinder closed at one end.  As
each lamp emits the line spectra of the element
present in its cathode, a different lamp is
usually used for each element analyzed.

Each hollow cathode lamp operates under the
same general principle.  The lamp envelope is
filled with an inert gas, usually argon or neon,
at a low pressure (1 to 10 mm Hg).  Once
sufficient voltage is applied across the electrodes
within the lamp, the inert gas ionizes and
current begins to flow.  When this happens
positive gas ions bombard the cathode and
heating occurs.  As the inner surface of the
cathode heats, it sputters and metal vapor
fills the cathode volume.  Charged gas particles
collide with the metal atom,  raising its valence
electrons to higher energy states.  When these
excited electrons return to their ground  state,
they emit light.  The spectrum thus emitted
contains the same wavelengths of light required
for absorption by that metal atom under  analysis.
As many cathodes are alloyed to obtain mech-
anical strength and as the gas fill is also
excited, the emission of a hollow cathode lamp
contains the spectra of more than one element.

Another step to increase the usefullness  of a
hollow cathode lamp was to incorporate more
than one element into the cathode so the  lamp
could be used for more than one element.  This
has been done and there are available lamps
that contain as many as six elements.  Not .all
elements can be usefully combined in multi-
element lamps.

Some combinations are difficult or impossible
from a metallurgical viewpoint.  More important
to the user, some combinations, though  feasible
to manufacture,  yield spectral interferences.
Here the emission lines from one element lie
CH.MET.aa.4. 1.76
                                     5-1

-------
 Energy Sources for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
 too close to those of another element,  so that
 spurious absorption signals can results, if
 the second  element is also present in the sample.

 When three or more elements are combined in
 a lamp, it is also frequently true that the
 emission from the individual  elements is not
 as bright as that from single-element lamps.
 However, one chief advantage lies in the cost.
 A multi-element lamp is not proportionately
 as expensive as a single-element lamp.  Also,
 the curves  of absorbance versus concentration
 obtained with multi-element lamps may be less
 linear than  those from single element sources,
 particularly at high absorptions.

 The operating current of a hollow  cathode lamp
 can be  a critical parameter in optimizing an
 atomic absorption measurement.  Lamp
 intensities and resulting absorbance in the
 flame  do not change linearly with operating
 current. Typically high absorbance and good
 signal-to-noise ratios are obtained at current
 near one-third the maximum  lamp currents.
 Increasing the hollow cathode lamp current
 will increase its output intensity.  But sensi-
 tivity is reduced through line broadening and/or
 self reversal for some elements.  As a result,
 we can expect better sensitivity at lower lamp
 currents.

 Most manufacturers will provide a rated max-
 imum current beyond which the lamp should
 not be operated.  Any operation above this
 current produces the danger of destruction of
 the cathode. It is best to follow the manufacturer'
 suggested operational current when using its
 lamp.   If warm-up of the lamp is necessary,  as
 in a single beam spectrophotometer this can be
 done at currents below the operating current,
 bringing the lamp to proper current just before
 use.  Lamp current will affect lamp life.
 Experimental data have  shown that lamp life
 is reduced by the square of the current increase.
 Thus, lower lamp current can only improve
the performance and life of a  hollow  cathode
lamp.

Each hollow cathode lamp will have a different
warm-up time which can vary from 5 to 20
minutes.  Use of a lamp in a single beam
instrument will require a warm-up time but
a double beam instrument does not require
 this waiting period.  The use in some instru-
 ments of multiple-lamp turret assembly
 facilitates the operation of many lamps at
 different operating currents to speed the time
 of analysis by eliminating warm-up time when
 lamps are changed.  In single beam instruments
 a multi-element lamp is attractive because
 all its elements are ready when one element is
 ready.

 Lamp life is hard to estimate; however,  most
 manufacturers guarantee their lamps for a
 use period of five ampere hours.  When this
 figure is divided by typical operating currents,
 the average guarantee extends to between 300
 and 500  hours of use. In practice, most lamps
 last a great deal longer.  If lamps are not
 used regularly, it is wise to operate them for
 at least  one hour per month on normal current
 in order to reduce the possibility of fluctuation
 when the lamp is finally put into-use.
 H  SUMMARY

  In atomic absorption Spectroscopy,  the hollow
  cathode lamp is perhaps the most important
  component.  The usefulness of a given analysis
  depends directly on the brightness,  spectral
  purity and stability of the lamp.  Also, the
  economic feasibility of owning atomic absorption
  equipment is often closely tied to hollow cathode
  lamp life.
s REFERENCES

  1  Kahn, Herbert L.  Principles and Practice
       of Atomic Absorption.  Advances in
       Chemistry Series.  Number 73.  1968.

  2  Steensrud, S. A.  Choosing an A. A.
       Spectrophotometer.   Research/ Development.
       August 1975.

  3  Technical Bulletin.  Varian Techtron.  1970.

  4  Technical Bulletin.  Perkm-Elmer.  1969.

  5  Instrument Manual. Instrumentation
       Laboratory,  Inc.
 5-2

-------
                                    Energy Sources for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
                                  vANODE
                                    NEON
                                       OR
                                   AROON
FILLER  OAS
                                  CATHODE
      \
               .END  WINDOW
                   (quorti)
                                                     ENVELOPE  (fllan)
                 HOLLOW CATHODE LAMP
                       FIGURE 1
This outline was prepared by J. D, Pfaff,
National Training Center, MOTD, OWPO,
USEPA,  Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
Descriptors: Spectroscopy, Spectrophotometers
                                                                              5-3

-------
                  PRINCIPLES OF ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY
  I   INTRODUCTION

 In any system  employing principles of
 absorption spectroscopy,  there are three
 basic components.

 A   SOURCE of Radiant Energy

 B   MEDIUM (Sample) which absorbs
     Radiant Energy

 C   DETECTOR to measure the Radiant
     Energy transmitted by the Sample
  RADIANT CTIBOY
Figure 1.   Basic Components of Absorptioi
                 Spectroscopy System
 II   RADIANT ENERGY

 A   Wave Nature

      1    The various forms of radiant
          energy have been  arranged in a
          single schematic diagram referred
          to as the electromagnetic spectrum
          (see Figure 2).  Allof the energies
          which  make up this spectrum may
          be  represented graphically as
          waves. All waves move through
          space  (and for most purposes air)
          at a constant velocity, 3 X 1010
          cm/sec.

      2    Three variable characteristics of
          individual waves serve to differ-
          entiate each from all  other waves
          in the  spectrum.
        a    The Wave Length

             X - The linear distance be-
                 tween the crests of two
                 adjacent waves.  (Units:
                 distance/wave.)

        b    The Frequency
             v -  The number  of .waves
                 which pass a given point
                 in a unit of time.  (Units:
                 waves/time unit.)

        c    The Wave Number
            'v -  The number of waves
                 which occur in a given
                 linear distance.  (Units:
                 waves/distance unit.)

    2   It is evident  that more waves of
        short wavelength will "fit"  into a
        given linear distance than would
        waves of a greater wavelength.
        Thus, waves having short wave-
        lengths  will have higher wave
        numbers.  Mathematically, wave
        length is the reciprocal of wave
        number, if the same units of linear
        measurement are used in each
        expression.  Since the velocity of
        all waves is equal and constant, it
        is also apparent that a greater
        number of waves of short wave-
        length can pass a given point in a
        unit of time than waves having a
        longer wavelength.

B   Particle Nature

    Planck conducted certain experiments
    which indicated that light has a particle
    as well as a wave nature.  Energy rays
    can be said to consist of particles with
    a definite amount of energy.  These
    particles or packets are referred to
    as photons or quanta.  The energy (E)
    of each minute packet is given  by
    Planck's equation.
CH.MET.al.5c. 1.76  .
                                  6-1

-------
Principles of Absorption Spectroscopy
   E  - hv                  (5)

   Where  E = Radiant Energy in ergs

          h = Planck's proportionality
              constant (6.6  X  10'27
              erg sec.)
              Frequency in waves per
              second
   Thus, it can be seen that the energy of
   a given photon is directly proportional
   to the frequency of the given Radiant
   Energy.
Ill ABSORPTION OF ENERGY BY ATOMS
   AND MOLECULES

A  Absorption of energies of given fre-
   quencies by atoms and molecules can
   be used as a basis for their qualitative
   identification. Absorption spectro-
   scopy is based on the principle that
   certain displacements of electrons or
   atoms within a molecule are per-
   missible according to the quantum
   theory. When radiant energy of the
   same energy  required to bring about
   this permissible change is supplied to
   the molecule, the change occurs and
   energy is absorbed.
FREQUENCY
WAVELENGTH

WAVE NUMBER









1020 ,016 10'2 !08
ft10 ffi* 1^2 102
TO2 102 10* 1010
1010 106 102 f52



.


^ 	 ^H

	 SB
104
10*
1014
re*








^^-L.
                                FIGURE 2
  (1)

  (2)

  (3)

  (4)
                ~.\_ I      I Crest
            AA/wwv
1 1 .
0
WAVE LENGTH
X
distance
wave
X (cm/ wave)
i i

X
X
X
X
t Trough
1 i i i i
5
FREQUENCY
V
waves
time
v (waves/ sec)

=
=
=
=
1 , . 1
10 13
CONSTANT
c
distance
time
C = (3X IQiO
                   VELOCITY

                    cm/sec)
            Figure 3.  Relationship of Wave Length and Frequency

-------
                                            Principles of Absorption Spectroscopy
WAVELENGTH A° 2,
X-Rays

Calories per mole
needed for change
Cf:o
Inner
Electron Shift
000 4,
Ultraviolet

142, 000
e
O'o
lonization
000 8,
Visible

71,000
O'o
Outer
Electron Shift
000 200,
Near IR

35,000
-*^-
O'- o
Vibration
000 (20M)
Far IR

1,400
O • o
Rotation
1
Figure 4. Electromagnetic Spectrum Showing Energy Ranges and
Corresponding Electronic, Vibrational and Rotational Motions
Displacement of electrons is a per-
missible change which can  occur
when  energy of ultraviolet  and
visible frequencies strikes certain
atoms and molecules.

a   Inner electron shift

    Electrons located in the inner
    orbit of an atom may, when the
    proper frequency  of radiant
    energy is available, shift to an
    orbit farther removed from
    the nucleus.  This shift repre-
    sents a change from a lower
    energy to a higher one.  If this
    new position is unstable, the
    electron may revert to  some
    position nearer the nucleus;
    the energy  which was gained
    may then be emitted from the
    atom as part of its emission
    spectrum.    The number of
    energy changes possible  within
    an atom is  a function of the
    number of  electrons and the
    number of  changes  each may
    enter.  Each possible change
    gives rise  to a new  spectral
    frequency.  Since the frequency
    of radiation needed to accom-
    plish such  changes is of a high
    order of  magnitude,  the energy
    used is considerable in quantity.

    Molecular  aggregations  often
    disintegrate in such  circum-
stances; thus,  these  higher
frequencies are used  mainly
for work with  elements or
very stable compounds.

lonization
Under a specific frequency of
radiation, an electron may be
physically separated from its
parent atom.   This process
has been termed ionization. A
change of energy level of this
magnitude  requires "less
energy than the inner electron
shift.  Such changes are char-
acteristic of those of  the rare
earths,  inorganic ions, tran-
sition elements and  many
organic compounds under
frequencies within the ultra-
violet range.

Outer electron  shift

The various orbital electrons
in an atom may vary  in the
amount of energy required to
shift them outwardly  from the
nucleus. For example, it re-
quires less energy to shift an
electron from a position more
distant than it does to shift an
electron outwardly from the
inner orbit.  Outer electron
shifts occur readily in colored
organic molecules for which
                                                                             6-3

-------
 Principles ot Absorption Spectroscopy
             electronic  transitions are
             made easier by the presence
             of chromophore groups which
             participate in  resonance.
             Thus, the excitation  of the
             delocalized outer  electrons
             (pi electrons) i s relatively
             easy and requires energy in
             the visible range.

         Vibration of atoms within molecules
         is a permissible change which can
         occur when energy of near infrared
         frequency strikes certain organic
         molecules.

         The atoms within a molecule are
         held together by attractive bonding
         forces. Atoms within  a molecule
         are constantly moving  toward and
         away from other atoms,  but for
         purposes of theory  can be said  to
         have a certain "average" position.

         The change in position of an atom
         in relation to another atom is called
         vibration. The mechanics of vibra-
         tion require energy; the manner
         and rate  of vibration of the atoms
         depend upon frequencies of electro-
         magnetic radiation  which strikes
         them.  Therefore,  a specific part
         of a molecule may absorb significant
         quantities of certain spectral fre-
         quencies. Such absorption will be
         reflected in the absorption spectrum
         of the compound.  The energy re-
         quirements for this type of energy
         change are of a  lower order of
         magnitude than  those above;
         therefore, we would expect that the
         frequency required wouldbe lower
         and the wave length longer.  Such
         changes occur  in organic com-
         pounds under infrared  radiation.

         Rotation of molecules is a permis-
         sible change which  can occur when
         energy of far infrared  frequency
         strikes certain organic molecules.

         A molecule rotates around its sym-
         metrical center.  The manner and
         rate of rotation again depends upon
         the energy supplied to  it.
        Specific spectral frequencies of
        electromagnetic radiation can be
        employed to increase the rate of
        rotation.  The used radiation is,
        in effect,  absorbed and reflected
        in the absorption spectrum.
        Organic molecules utilize infra-
        red radiation while varying their
        rate and manner of rotation.

B   The Lambert-Beer Law provides the
    basis for  quantitative analysis by
    absorption spectroscopy.  It is a com-
    bination of the Bouguer (or Bouguer-
    Lambert) and Beer Laws.

    1   Bouguer (or Bouguer-Lambert) Law
        When a beam  of monochromatic
        radiation passes through an ab-
        sorbing medium, eachmfinitesi-
        mally  small layer of the medium
        decreases the  intensity of the
        beam by a constant fraction.
        Mathematically
db
                                      (6)
         On integration and converting base
         e to base 10 logarithms.
             log
                  Ic
                  I
                        = A =  Kb
                (7)
             -dl  =  increment by which in-
                   cident monochromatic
                   radiation is decreased
                   (or absorbed) by the
                   medium.
               I  =  intensity of the radia-
                   tion emerging from the
                   absorbing medium.

               k  =  proportionality constant
                   whose value depends on
                   the wave length and the
                   nature of the medium,
                    i.e.,  the solvent used
                   if the absorbing medi-
                   um is a solution .  and
                   the temperature.
              db = increment  thickness of
                   the absorbing medium.
6-4

-------
                                                 Principles of Absorption Spectroscopy
     I  = radiation entering the medium.
     log  r0—   » A = absorbance
                     (optical density)
     K •   2.303 k

     b =  length of radiation passing
          t h rough the medium (i.e.,
          the width of the cell, gener-
          ally express in cm. )

     Beer's Law
     Each molecule of an absorbing
     medium absorbs the same fraction
     of radiation incident upon it regard-
     less of concentration.
     Mathematically:

                dc
If!1
 I
-=—  = k1
(8)
     On integration and converting base
     e to base 10 logarithms,
    log    -
            K1 c
                              (9)
    k1   =  a proportionality constant
           whose value is governed by
           the same factors which  de-
           termine the value of k.
    dc   «  increment concentration of
           the absorbing medium.

    K'   »  2.303 k1
    c    «  concentration of the absorb-
           ing medium (in the case of a
           solution c is generally ex-
           pressed in moles/liter.)
    Lambert-Beer Law
A • log
        TJ~
          e b c
                             (10)
           a constant obtained by com-
           bining K plus K'.   When b is
           expressed in cm and c in
           moles/liter,  e Is called the
           molar absorptivity.
Transmittance,(T)  =  -=—       (11)
                       lo

%Transmittance <%T)  = ^—100  (12)
                       *o

The relationship between absorbance
and transmittance is given by the ex-
pression:

          A - log -L

5   The application of the Lambe'rt-
    Beer Law to a problem involving
    quantitative analysis  is made by
    the use of a calibration curve
    (or graph).  See Figure 5.

    Several standard solutions
    containing known concentrations
    of the material under analysis
    are "read" in the spectrophoto-
    meter.  Figure 5 is prepared by
    graphing concentrations v,s. cor-
    responding absorbance readings.
    If a straight line is obtained, the
    material is said to follow Beer's
    Law in the concentration range
    involved.  The absorbance  of tne
    sample is then "read"  and the
    corresponding concentration ob-
    tained from the calibration curve.
Increasing
Absorbance
                            Increasing
                            Concentration
                                       >'  '.
                                                    Figure 5.
                                        ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
    The term transmittance is some-
    times used to express how much
    radiation has been absorbed by a
    medium.
                                        This outline contains certain portions from
                                        a previous outline by Betty Ann Purighorst,
                                        former Chemist, National Training Center,
                                                                                 6-5

-------
Principles of Absorption Spectroscopy
SOURCE OF
RADIANT
RANGE ENERGY
ABSORPTION BY SAMPLE . DETECTION OF
CHEMICAL NATURE
OF SAMPLE
TYPE OF SAMPLE RADIANT ENERGY
CELL USED TRANSMITTED
           I
Ultraviolet! Hydrogen Arc
                              Inorganic ions and
                               Organic Molecules
Quartz Fluor it e
Photoelectric Cells'

(Photographic
1  Plates          !

1 Visible


Incandescent
Tungsten Bulb

Colored Inorganic and
Organic Molecules


Glass

1
— i
Eye Photographic j
Plates
Photoelectric Cells <
1
i j
Infrared   jNernst Glower     Organic Molecules
           1  Globar Lamp
                                                    Sodium Chloride or  Thermocouple,
                                                     Potassium Bromid^              J
REFERENCES

1   Delahay, Paul.  Instrumental Analysis.
        The MacMillan Co.,  New York.
        1957.

2   Mellon, M. G.  Analytical Absorption
        Spectroscopy.   John Wiley & Sons,
        Inc., 1950.

3   Willard, Merritt & Dean.   Instrumental
        Methods of Analysis.   D. van No-
        strand Co., Inc., 1958.
                                                     Dyer.   Applications of Absorption
                                                         Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds
                                                         Prentice-Hall, Inc.  1965.
                                                 This outline was prepared by C. R. Feldmann,
                                                 National Training Center, MOTD,  OWPO,
                                                 USEPA,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268.

                                                 Descriptors: Chemical Analysis,  Water Tests,
                                                 Spectroecopy, Spectrophotometry
   6-6

-------
                                 FLAME PHOTOMETRY
 I    PRELIMINARY

 Flame photometry is the art and science of
 applying thermal energy (heat) to  elements
 in order to effect orbital shifts which produce
 measurable characteristic radiations.  The
 color of the  emission and the intensity of
 brightness of emission permit both qualita-
 tive and  quantitative identification.

 The application of a very hot flame (2000°C
 or more) produces excitation  of the element,
 caused by the raising of  an electron to a
 higher energy level and i s followed by t h e
 loss of a small amount of energy in the form
 of radiant energy  as the electron falls back
 into its original position or to a lower energy
 level.
II   INSTRUMENTATION

The six essential parts of a flame photo-
meter are:  pressure regulators ,an d flow
meters for the fuel gases, atomizer, burner,
optical system, photosensitive detector and
an instrument for indicating or recording
output of the detector.  These components
are schematically shown in Figure 1.

A   Atomizer and Burner

    Numerous  variations in atomizer and
    burner designs have been used.  Figure
    2 depicts the integral aspirator- burner
    used in Beckman instruments.    The
    sample i s introduced through  the
    innermost  concentric tube, a vertical
                                 YELLOW
   COLLIMATING
   MIRROR
\J
TECTOR


AMPLIFIER



c

A

                                                                            METER
             SAMPLE

        ATOMIZER  BURNER
                FIGURE 1. SIMPLIFIED DIAGRAM OF A FLAME PHOTOMETER
CH.MET, Ibc. 12.71
                                                                                      7-1

-------
Flame Photometry
    palladium capillary.  A  concentric
    channel provides oxygen, and its tip is
    constricted to form aft orifice.  Oxygen
    is passed from this orifice  causing the
    sample solution to be drawn up to the
    tip of the inner capillary.  There, the
    liquid is sheared off and  dispersed into
    droplets. All droplets  are  introduced
    directly into flame,  with a sample con-
    sumption of 1 - 2 ml per minute.

    The main requirement of the burner is
    production of a steady flame when sup-
    plied with fuel and oxygen  or air at
    constant pressures.  In the Beckman
    aspirator-burner, a concentric channel
    provides oxygen to operate the atomizer
    and the flame.   The additional concen-
    tric channel provides fuel for the flame.

B   Optical System,  Photosensitive Detector
    and Amplifier

    The optical system must collect the
    light from the steadie st part of the flame,
    render it monochromatic with a prism,
    grating or filters, and then focus it on-
    to the photosensitive surface of the de-
    tector. Use of filter photometers is least
    desirable due to their limited resolution.
    Flame  spectrophotometers improve
    application as they will separate emis-
    sions in a mixture of metals, such as
    manganese lines at 403. 3 nm and the
    potassium lines at 404.6 nm  Place-
    ment of a concave mirror  behind the
    flame  so that the flame is at the center
    of the  curvature increases intensity of
    flame  emission  by a factor  of 2.

    Any photosensitive device may be used
    in a flame photometer.   The detector
    must have a response in the portion of
    the spectrum to be used and have good
    sensitivity.   The photomultiplier tube
    is the  preferred detector for flame
    spectrophotometers.

    The amplifier increases the  signal from
    the phototube and improves  resolution
    between close spectral lines.   It also
    permits identification of  e 1 e ments
    present in samples when the concen-
    tration is very small.
                t
                   ^^25333
                             •Fuel
' Oxygen
               Sample

  Figure 2.  DETAILED DIAGRAM OF
            BURNER-ATOMIZER   ,.'"
Ill  APPLICATIONS OF FLAME
    PHOTOMETRY TO WATER ANALYSES

Measurement of sodium and potassium in the
past has been confined to complex, tedious
and time-consuming gravimetric procedures.
The flame technique enables the analyst to
perform these determinations in a matter
of seconds.   If these metals alone  were the
only'elements capable of measurement by
flame photometry the use of the instrument
could still be justified in a great many
laboratories.

Other cations which may be detected and
measured in waters and waste materials
are calcium, magnesium, lithium, copper,
and others.  Table 1 includes those elements
which may be measured with commercially
available equipment, including ultra-violet
and photomultiplier accessories.

Table 1 does not  include wavebands which
occur in the infrared spectrum.   Sodium,
for example, has an emission band at 819 nm
which is not  detectable with the common
instruments.

Many other  metals, including the rare earths,
can be  measured using the flame technique
but they are not included in the table because
 7-2

-------
                                         Flame Photometry
                Table 1

Aluminum


Barium


Beryllium

Boron


Cadmium


Calcium



Chromium



Copper


Iron



Wavelength
484.2
467.2
396.2
553.6
493

471
510
548
521
495
326. 1?
228.8*

422. 7
622
554

425.4
3609
520

324
327'

372
386
373

Approximate
Sensitivity
mg/1
2
3
4
0.3
0.4

25
100
1
2
3
2
40

0.003
0.004
0.01

0. 1
0. 1
0. 1

0.01
0.01

0.2
0.2
0.3


Lead


Lithium

Magnesium


Manganese


Mercury

Potassium



Silver


Sodium


Strontium



Zinc

Wavelength
405,
368,
364'
670.8

371
383
285. 2
403
279*
561
235. 7*

766.5
404. 6,
344. 7

338. 3^
328. 1

589.3,
330.3"

460. 7
681
407.8

213.9*
500
Approximate
Sensitivity
mg/1
2
2
3
0.002

0. 1
0.1
0.2
0.01
1
2
10

0.001
0.2
3

0.05
0. 1

0.002
1

0.02
0.01
0.5

500
200
#
•>
Ultraviolet spectrum
Doubtful detection in visible spectrum
                                                             7-3

-------
Flame Photometry
the necessity for their measurement in water
is a rare occurrence.
IV   INTERFERENCES

A   Spectroscopic Interferences

     Energy at other wave lengths or from
     other elements  than those intended to
     be measured may reach the detector.
     This problem is related to the resolution
     of the instrument and slit widths used.

     Many of the instrumental difficulties are
     related to reproducibility of the flame.
     The quality and composition of the fuel
     affect the constancy and temperature of
     the flame which in turn influences the
     energy of emission.   Likewise,  slight
     variations in fuel pressures and ratios
     affect the reproducibility of the flame
     with reference to shape,  temperature,
     background, rate of sample consumption,
     etc.  In some cases, the temperature
     ot the flame is the limiting factor in de-
     termining the presence of a metal. (The
     alkaline earth metals emit  radiations
     at "low"  temperatures,  whereas other
     metals require  very "hot" flames.)

     Table 2 indicates temperatures obtain-
     able with different fuel-oxidant mixtures.
                 Table 2.
         Approximate Temperatures of
           Fuel-Oxidant Mixtures for
             Flame Photometer Use
Fuel-Oxidant
Hydrogen - air
Hydrogen - oxygen
Acetylene - oxygen
Acetylene - air *
Propano - oxygen
Illuminating gas - oxygen
Cyanogen - oxygen **
Approximate
Temp. °C

2700 -

2000 -
2700 -


2100
2800
3100
2200
2800
2800
4900
*  Undesirable because of carbon deposits.
** Used in research problems.
    Emission reading of spectral lines
    always includes any contribution from
    the flame background emission on which
    the line  is  superimposed.   When the
    photometer includes a mono chroma tor,
    it  is possible to read the background
    radiation in the presence of the  test
    element.  First, the line + background
    intensity is measured in the normal
    manner at the peak or crest of the band
    system.  Next,  the wave length dial is
    rotated slowly until emission readings
    decrease to a minimum at a wave length
    located off to one side or the other of
    the emission line or band. It is usually
    preferable to read the background at a
    lower wave length than the peak. Back-
    ground reading is subtracted from the
    line + background reading.

    Products of combustion may  affect the
    characteristics of  the flame or may
    affect the optical system by fogging or
    coating of lenses and mirrors.

B   Factors  Related to the Composition
    of the Sample

    An element  may be self-absorb ing --
    a phenomenon in which the energy of
    ex citation is not proportional to the con-
    centration of the element.  As previously
    discussed, exictation is  followed by
    loss of energy in the form of radiation
    as the electron falls back to its original
    position  or to a lower energy level.
    During passage of radiant energy through
    the outer" fringes of the  flame/ this
    energy is subject to absorption through
    collision with atoms of its own  kind
    present  in the ground energy level.
    Absorption of radiant energy  weakens
    the strength of the spectrum line. Using
    the emission line at 589 nm for sodium.
    Figure 3  indicates that the line ceases
    to be linear at  13 mg/1.   As the sodium
    concentration increases, the self-
    absorption ef f e c t s become  more
    pronounced.  Sample dilution to permit
    reading on linear portion of the curve
    is often practiced.

    Two or  more elements present in the
    sample may produce radiant energy at
 7-4

-------
                                                              Flame Photometry
the same, or near the same wavelength.
For instance,  calcium at 423 nm and
chromium at 425 nm could interfere
with each other by additive effect.  The
correction may be to dilute out the un-
wanted metal or measure one of the
emissions at a different wavelength.

The emission energy of one element may
be enhanced or depressed by energies
from other elements.  This phenomenon
(radiation interference) occurs when one
element causes another to modify its ac-
tual emission intensity in either a neg-
ative or positive manner. Correction
is obtained by dilution or by controlled
interference addition.

Other types of difficulties encountered
are too numerous to list here.   In gen-
eral, they may be overcome by improved
instruments (high resolution, narrower
slit openings, optics, flame adjustment)
or possibly by special techniques.

Some inexpensive instruments, designed
for limited use, may employ illuminating
gas with air or propane with air as  a
matter of economy or convenience.
STANDARD CURVE FOR SODIUM
            10
        mg Sodium/1
           Figure 3
V   TECHNIQUES

The following techniques  are intended to
serve as examples of current procedures
in use for routine samples and for special
samples where corrective procedures are
indicated.

A   Emission Intensity vs. Concentration

    This is the classical procedure in flame
    photometry.   Solutions  (standards)
    containing known concentrations of test
    elements are compared with an unknown
    sample.   This technique is applicable
    only when no interference is present.

B   Radiation Buffers

    For measurements of alkaline earth
    metals (sodium,  potassium, calcium,
    magnesium) radiation buffers  are pre-
    pared as solutions saturated with
    regard to each metal, respectively.  A
    potassium buffer, for example, is pre-
    pared by saturating distilled water with
    sodium,  calcium, and magnesium
    chloride. A calcium buffer in turn is
    saturated with sodium, potassium and
    magnesium chloride.

C   Preparation of Radiation Buffers

    For a sodium measurement, the buffer
    solution  is added equally to samples
    and standards so that the interferences
    are alike for all readings, thereby
    cancelling each other (see Table 3).

D   Instrument Improvement

    Potassium emits  energy bands at 766,
    405, and 345 nm.  The bands  are at
    opposite  ends of the spectrum and the
    405 and 345 bands are not usable in the
    visible spectrum. The 766 line also
    loses sensitivity  because of its prox-
    imity to the infrared region.   Use of a
    red sensitive  phototube or photomulti-
    plier, however,  permits measurement
    with an ordinary  instrument at concen-
    trations as low as 0.1 mg/1, or less.
  '  This approach i s applicable to other
    elements also.
                                                                                 7-5

-------
 Flame Photometry
 K   Standard Addition

     Equal volumes oi the sample are added
     10 a series of standard solutions con-
     taining  different known quantities of
     test element,  all diluted to the same
     volume (see Table 4).  Emission in-
     tensities of the resulting solutions are
     then determined at the wavelength of
     maximum emission and at a suitable
     point on the flame background.  After
     subtracting the background emission,
     the resulting net emissions are plotted
     linearly against the concentration of
     the increments of the standard solutions
     that were mixed with the unknown  The
     percent transmission of the mixture
     containing unknown  sample and zero
     standai d (distilled water) is doubled
     and the concentration  corresponding
     to this  point  on the graph will be the
     concentiation of the undiluted unknown
     sample   This can be explained alge-
     braicallj in conjunction with Figure 4.
         F   Internal-Standard Method

             The method consists of adding to each
             sample and standard a fixed quantity of
             internal standard element.  The element
             must be one not  already present in the
             sample.  Lithium is usually the  inter-
             nal standard used. This method is most
             convenient  when using instruments
             having dual detectors. The emission
             intensities  of standards and samples
             are read simultaneously  or succes-
             ively depending upon  instrumentation.

         G   Separation  of Interferences

             In cases where certain elements inter-
             fere,  they may be physically removed,
             or the interference may be  "blocked
             out" by reading the emission at different
             wavelengths.  To measure lithium, for
             example,  calcium, barium,  and
             strontium are precipitated as carbon-
             ates of the  metals.  The  lithium is
             retained in the filtrate and measured
             at a wavelength  of 671 nm.
r
     Sodium Bufier

     Potassium Buffer

     Calcium Bufier

     Magnesium Buffer
                                  NaCl
       KC1
Table 3
CaCl2
MgCi2
i Cone, of standards
! Volume oi standard
j added to sample
| Volume of sample used
i Concentration ot element
in each portion of mixture

0.0 mg/1
10.0 ml
10.0 ml
^i-O mg/1
£
Table 4
5.0 mg/1
10.0 ml
10.0 ml
1+2.5 mg/1

10.0 mg/1
10.0 ml
10.0 ml
\ + 5 mg/1

 7-6

-------
                                                             Flame Photometry
                  50
                   (f+0)

-------
Flame Photometry
BIBLIOGRAPHY

1   Kingsley, George R.  and Schaffert,
        Roscoe R.    Direct Microdeter-
        rmnation of Sodium, Potassium
        and  Calcium in a Single Biological
        Specimen with the Model Du Flame
        Spectrophotometer and Photo-
        multiplier Attachment.
        Anal. Chem. 2^:1937-41.   1953.

2   Gilbert,  PaulT. Jr.    Flame Photo-
        metry - New Precision in Elemental
        Analysis.  Industrial Laboratories
        Beckman Reprint R-56.  Aug. 1952.

3   Detection Limits for the Beckman Model
        Du Flame Spectrophotometer. Data
        Sheet 1.  Beckman Publication,
        April 1952.

4   Baker, G. L. and Johnson,  L. H.
        Interference of Anions on Calcium
        Emission in Flame Photometry.
        Anal. Chem. 26^.465-568.  1954.

5   West, P. W.,  Folse, P.  and
        Montgomery, D.    The Application
        of Flame Spectrophotometry to
        Water Analysis.  Anal. Chem. 22 667.
        Beckman Reprint R-40.  Model
        10300.  1950.
    Scott, R.K.,  Marcy, V.M. am1
        Hromas, J. J.   The Flame
        Photometer in the Analysis of
        Water and Water-formed Deposits
        ASTM Bulletin. Model 10300.
        (Abs.)May,  1951.  page 12.

    Burriel, F.,  Marte and Ramirez, J.
        Flame Photometry.  Munoz
        Elsevier Pub.Co., N.Y.  1957.

    Chow, T. J. and Thompson, T.G.
        Standard Addition  Method.
        Anal. Chem. 27:18-21.  1955.
TEXTS.

1   Willard, H.H., Merntt, L. L.  and
        Dean, J. A.    Instrumental
        Methods of Analysis.  D.  van
        Nostrand Co.,  Inc., N.Y.  1958.

2   Dean, J. A.    Flame Photometry
        McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y. 1960.

3   Clark, G. L.    The Encyclopedia of
        Spectroscopy.  Reinhold  Pub-
        lishing Corp.,  N.Y.  1960.
                                                 This outline was prepared by R. C. Kroner,
                                                 Chief,  Physical and Chemical Methods,
                                                 Analytical Quality Control Laboratory,
                                                 NERQ  EPA, Cincinnati,  OH  45268.

                                                 Descriptors- Chemical Analysis, Water Tests,
                                                 Flame  Photometry, Spectrophotometry,
                                                 Spectroscopy
7-8

-------
               DETERMINATION OF CALCIUM AND MAGNESIUM HARDNESS
I   INTRODUCTION

A  Definition of Hardness

    USPHS - "In natural waters, hardness
    is a characteristic of water which re-
    presents the total concentration of just
    the calcium and magnesium ions ex-
    pressed as calcium carbonate.  If
    present in significant amounts,  other
    hardness-producing metallic ions should
    be included. "

B  Other Definitions in Use

    1 Some confusion exists in understanding
      the concept of hardness  as a result of
      several definitions presently used.

    2 Soap hardness definition includes hy-
      drogen ion because it has the capacity
      to precipitate soap. Present definition
      excludes hydrogen ion because it is not
      considered metallic.

    3 Other agencies define  hardness as
      "the property attributable to presence
      of alkaline-earths".

    4 USPHS definition is best in relation
      to objections of hardness in water.
II   CAUSES OF HARDNESS IN WATERS OF
    VARIOUS REGIONS OF THE U. S.

A   Hardness will vary throughout the country
    depending on:

    1   Leaching action of water traversing
       over and through various types of
       geological formations.

    2   Discharge of industrial and domestic
       wastes to water courses.

    3   Uses of water which result  in change
       in hardness,  such as irrigation and
       water softening process.
 B  Objections to Hardness

    1  Soap-destroying properties

    2  Scale  formation

 C  Removal and Control

    Hardness may be removed and controlled
    through the use of various  softening oper-
    ations such as zeolite, lime-soda,  and
    hot phosphate processes.   It can also be
    removed by simple distillation or com-
    plex formation with surface active agents
    (detergents).

Ill  DETERMINATION OF HARDNESS
                       /c\
 A  Two Methods in Use* '

    1   Compleximetric method (EDTA)

    2   Calculation - by the use of appro-
       priate factors, the hardness due
       to ions other than calcium and
       magnesium may be converted to
       an equivalent calcium carbonate
       hardness.

 B  Compleximetric Method

    1  Principle of determination

       Ethylenediammetetra acetic acid
       (EDTA) is a sparingly soluble amino
       polycarboxylic acid which forms
       slightly ionized and very stable color-
       less complexes with the alkaline-
       earth  metals.

   *'&  Interferences:  iron, manganese,
       nickel,  and zinc.

    3  Procedure:  Time and pH considera-
       tions.

    4  Calculations of total hardness
       assuming a known volume of titrant
       of EDTA.

    5  Precision and accuracy.
 CH.HAR.3c. 1.76
                                                                                    8-1

-------
 Determination of Calcium and Magnesium Hardness
C   Determination of Calcium Hardness

    1  Principle of determinations

      Murexide indicator forms a  salmon-
      colored complex with calcium whose
      lonization constant is of a higher
      value than that of the Ca EDTA complex.

    2  Interferences  Heavy metals and Sr

    'i  Procedure  Time of tritation and
      proper lighting conditions are critical
      factors

    4  Calculation of Ca hardness.

    5  Precision and accuracy.


D   Determination of Magnesium Hardness

    1  Calculation by difference method
      most commonly used.

    2  Equivalent of Ca hardness is sub-
      tracted from total hardness  equiva-
      lents, the difference attributable to
      magnesium equivalents.

    3  Other methods such as pyrophosphate
      method,  where calculation by differ-
      ence method cannot be used
 IV ANALYTICAL QUALITY CONTROL
   METHODS

 A The Environmental Protection Agency,
   Analytical Quality Control Laboratory
   has published a manual titled Methods
   for Chemical Analysis of Water and
   Wastes, 1974. -
B  The procedure for the determination
   of hardness, as discussed in this  ,
   manual, was excerpted from the
   13th ed. of Standard Methods*4)
   and part 23 of ASTM. <5)
REFERENCES

1  Barnard, A. J.  Jr.,  Broad, W.C. and
      Flaschka, H.  The EDTA Titration.
      J. T. Baker Company.  1957.

2  U. S. Public Health Service. Drinking
      Water Standards.  USPHS Report,
      Volume 61,  No.  11,  1946.

 3 Rainwater, R. H.-and Thatcher, L. L.
      Methods for the Collection  and Anal-
      ysis of Water Samples. U.S. Geo-
      logical Survey Water Supply, Paper
      1454.  1960.
   Standard Methods for the Examination
      of Water and Wastewater,  13th ed.
      APHA,  AWWA,  WPCF, Method
      122B,  1971.

   ASTM Standards, Part 23,  Method
      D1126-67,  1973.


   Methods for Chemical Analysis of
      Water and Wastes, EPA-MDQARL,
      Cincinnati,  OH,  1974.-, >;/"
 This outline was prepared by B. V.  Salotto,
 Research Chemist,  Waste Identification and
 Analysis Section, MERL, EPA, and revised
 by C. R. Feldmann, Chemist,'National
 Training Center, MPOD, QWPO, -tJSEPA,
 Cincinnati, OH 45268.

 Descriptors- Calcium,  Chemical Analysis,
 Hardness,  Magnesium,  Water Analysis,
 Calcium Carbonate, Calcium Compounds,
 Magnesium Carbonate
 8-2

-------
        FLAMELESS MERCURY FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR TRACE METALS

                             DETERMINATION OF MERCURY
I  INTRODUCTION

There are many forms of mercury,  some
more toxic to humans  than others.  Although
metallic mercury and its inorganic, alkoxyalkyl,
and aryl compounds can have detrimental
effects on  man and other animals, it has
become clear that methylmercury poses a
particularly serious problem.  It appears
that mercury  enters the food chain as methyl
mercury after conversion by microorganisms
in the  silt  of waterways.

Sources of mercury in industrial and agricul-
tural  countries fall into'the following categories:
1) chlor-alkali plants, 2) industrial processes
involving the use of mercurial catalysts,
3) slimicides,  used primarily in the paper-
pulp industry,  4) seed treatment, 5) burning
of fossil fuels, 6) natural occurence from
geological formations,  and 7) miscellaneous
sources.

Early in 1970  fish in Lake St. Clair  above
Detroit were shown to contain hazardous levels
of methyl mercury.  However,  even before this
other countries such as Japan were having
serious problems with mercury poisoning.
"Minamata Disease" or methyl mercury
poisoning due  to ingestion of contaminated
fish occurred  in a village near the Minamata
Bay, Japan, from 1953 through the 1960's,  and
affected at least 121 children and adults.
Consequently, the finding of high levels of
methylmercury in Lake St.  Clair caused the
United States and Canada to ban  fishing in
the lake.

A study was carried out by the Office of Water
Supply during  1971 analyzing 698 samples of
raw and finished waters  collected from 273
communities.   Of these 273 communities,
261 showed no detectable quantities or
concentration  of less than O.'OOl ppm.  In
eleven of the communities the mercury
concentration  ranged from 0. 0010 to
0.0048 ppm.
 After the discovery of mercury contamination
 in fish, the importance of the mercury content
 of waters can be seen by the decreasing.-allowable
 limits.  The 1962 edition of the Public Health
 Service Drinking Water Standards did not list
 a limit for mercury.  However,  in 1970 a
 tentative standard of 0. 005 mg/1 limit was
 proposed.   Recently, March 1975, the Interim
 Primary Drinking Water Standards proposed
 a limit of 0.002 mg/1.
II   METHODS

 A  Dithizone

    Until about  1964 the method of choice for
    analysis of  mercury was the dithizone
    method.  This method utilized a colorimetric
    determination of the dithizone complex with
    mercury.  The method has been characterized
    as relatively insensitive and requiring
    excessive amounts of sample when levels of
    mercury are low.   The analyst  must have
    experience  in order to obtain meaningful
    results due to the  possibility of loss of
    volatile forms of mercury during a hot acid
    digestion procedure.   The method covered
    the range of 0.005 mg/1 to . 035 mg/1.

 B  Emission Spectroscopy

    The emission spectrophotometric determination
    of mercury was also carried out.  However,
    the cost of the instrument  made this method
    considerably more expensive than the
    dithizone method.   The detection limit fell
    in the range of about 5 mg/1 so  no increase
    in sensitivity  could be obtained.

 C  Atomic Absorption

    The detection limit by direct aspiration of
    a sample into the instrument was claimed to
    be 0. 5 mg/1.  However, in actual practice
    the limit was  closer to 5. 0 mg/1.  A
    concentration step before aspiration by
CH. ME.hg. 1. 1.76
                                       9-1

-------
Determination of Mercury
   chelation with ammonium pyrrolidine
   dithiocarbamate and extraction with
   methyl isobutyl ketone, reduced the
   detection limit to about 0. 2 mg/1.   Addi-
   tional sensitivity was claimed by using
   the sample boat which evaporated one
   milliliter of sample in a  boat like device
   followed by ignition of boat in the flame.
   This helped reduce the detection limit to
   around 0. 02 mg/1 but here again in actual
   practice the sensitivity was probably less.

D  Gas Chromatography

   A Swedish method  utilized an electron
   capture detector to detect materials at a
   sensitivity  approaching 0. 001 mg/1 in
   favorable cases.  This procedure was good
   for the organic forms of  mercury contami-
   nation such as methyl mercury,  ethyl
   mercury and methoxy ethyl mercury, and
   phenyl mercury.  Dimethyl mercury and
   the inorganic forms of mercury gave no
   response in this procedure.

E  Flameless  Atomic Absorption

   It had long  been known that the metallic  „
   mercury vapor absorbed energy at  2537 A.
   However, it was not until 1968 that a
   method was practical.  This method converts
   all forms of mercury present in the sample
   to the metallic form.   Therefore, the
   results in this method  are only for  total
   mercury since there is no differentiation.
   The detection limit for mercury was
   lowered to  a point that made adoption
   of low standards analytically practicable.
   The detection limit for mercury by the
   flameless method was  reduced to
   0.0002 mg/1.

   This procedure has become the standard
   analytical procedure  for the analysis of
   mercury.   Both the National Pollution
   Discharge Elimination System's analytical
   methods and the methods recommended
   to meet the Primary  Drinking Water
   Standards recommend the flameless atomic
   absorption technique.
Ill  FLAMELESS MEf HOD

 A Chemistry

    The procedure covered here is the procedure
    recommended in the Environmental Protection
    Agency's manual of "Methods for Chemical
    Analysis of Water and Wastes. "  The method
    is applicable to drinking,  surface,  and
    saline waters,  domestic and industrial
    wastes.

    In addition to inorganic forms of mercury,
    organic mercurials may also be present in
    a sample.  These  organo-mercury compounds
    will not respond to the falmeless atomic
    absorption technique unless they are1 first
    broken down and converted to mercuric ions.
    Potassium permanganate  oxidizes many of
    these compounds,  but recent studies have
    shown that a number of organic mercury
    compounds, including phenyl mercuric
    acetate and methyl mercuric chloride, are
    only partially oxidized by this reagent.
    Potassium persulfate has been found to give
    approximately 100% recovery when used as
    the oxidant with these compounds.  Therefore,
    a persulfate oxidation step following the
    addition of the potassium permanganate has
    been included to insure that organo-mercury
    compounds, if present, will be oxidized to
    the mercuric ion before measurement. A
    heat 'step is required for methyl mercuric
    chloride when present in or spiked to a
    natural system.  The range of the method
    may be varied through instrument and/or
    recorder expansion.   Using a 100  ml sample,
    a detection limit of 0. 2 n g Hg/1 can be
    achieved; concentrations below this level
    should be reported as < 0. 2.

    Possible interference from sulfide is
    eliminated  by the addition of potassium
    permanganate. Concentrations as high as
    20 mg/1 of  sulfide as sodium sulfide do not
    interfere with the  recovery of added inorganic
    mercury from distilled water.  Copper has
    also been reported to interfere;  however,
    copper concentrations  as high as 10 mg/1
    had no effect on recovery of mercury from
9-2

-------
                                                              Determination of Mercury
 spiked samples.  Sea waters, brines and
 industrial effluents high in chlorides require
 additional permanganate (as much as
 25 ml).  During the oxidation step chlorides
 are converted to free chlorine which will
 also absorb energy at 253 nm.  Care must
 be taken to assure that the free chlorine
 is absent before the mercury is reduced
 and swept into the cell.  This may be
 accomplished by using an excess of the
 hydroxylamine sulfate reagent (25 ml).
 In addition,  the dead air space in the
 aeration bottle must be purged before the
 addition of stannous sulfate.  Both inorganic
 and organic mercury spikes have been
 quantitatively recovered from sea water
 using this technique.

 Interference from certain volatile organic
 materials which will absorb at this wave-
 length (253 nm) is also possible.  A
 preliminary run without reagents should
 determine if this type of interference is
 present. If an  interference is found to be
 present, the sample should be analyzed
 both by using the regular procedure and
 again under oxidizing conditions only,
 that is without the reducing reagents.
 The true mercury value can then be
 obtained by subtracting the two values.

 The chemical procedure involves obtaining
 a sample of at least 100 ml.  Until more
 conclusive data are obtained, preservation
 of samples can be  accomplished by
 acidification with nitric acid to a pH of 2
 or lower immediately at the time of
 collection.   The 100 ml sample is placed
 in a 300 ml BOD bottle.  Add 5 ml of
 concentrated sulfuric acid and 2. 5 ml of
 concentrated nitric acid, mixing after each
 addition. Add 15 ml of potassium
 permanganate solution (5% solution) to
 each bottle.   For sewage samples additional
 potassium permanganate may be required.
 Shake and add additional amounts of potassium
 permanganate,  if necessary,  until the
 purple color exists for at least 15  minutes.
Add 8 ml of potassium persulfate (5%
 solution) to each bottle and heat for two
hours in a water bath at 95°C.  Cool and
 add 6 ml of sodium chloride-hydroxylamine
 sulfate (12 grams of each diluted to 100 ml)
to reduce the excess potassium permanganate.
Allow to stand at least 30 seconds.
   Up to this point all samples and standards
   being run can be treated in a group.  However,
   the final step should be done Just before the
   BOD bottle  containing the -solution is attached
   to the instrument.  This is to reduce the
   possibility of loss of any mercury vapor.
   The final step in the procedure Is to add
   5 ml of stannous sulfate (25 g diluted to 250 ml
   with 0.5 N sulfuric acid).  After the BOD
   bottle has been attached the sample is
   allowed to stand quietly without manual
   agitation.  The circulating pump is allowed
   to run continuously.  The absorbance will
   increase and reach maximum within one
   minute.  As soon as the indicating  device
   (meter or recorder) levels off the'reading
   is taken and the mercury vapor trapped.

B  Aeration Gas Flow Path

   Once the mercury Is reduced to metallic
   mercury by the stannous sulfate, the metallic
   vapor begins to escape from the solution.
   In order to  quantitatively drive off  all the
   vapor a pump is  used to push air Into the
   solution through ah aeration device such as
   a glass frit of coarse porosity.  The air
   acts as a carrier gas for the vapor.  An
   aeration device may be constructed as
   shown in Figure  1,

   Any peristaltic pump capable of delivering
   one liter of air per minute may be used.
   The pump should be checked occasionally
   via a rotometer to assure  that sufficient
   flow i,s being provided.

   The flow path of  the procedure can be set
   up in two ways,  in an open mode and a closed
   mode.  The closed mode recirculates the
   mercury vapor through the entire flow path,
   including the absorption cell, until a manual
   valve shunts the  vapors to a trap.  The open
   mode allows the  vapors to pass  only one
   time through the absorption tube and from
   there it goes to a trap.

   There are several pieces of equipment
   involved in the flow path-that are common
   to both modes.  The aeration bottle has been
   mentioned before, next in line should pome
   a de sic cant (of magnesium perchlorate) to
   adsorb water vapors  in order to prevent
   these from condensing in the absorption
   tube. If a conventional atomic absorption
                                                                                  9-3

-------
Determination of Mercurv
                              AIR IN—H
                  GLASS FRIT
          COURSE POROSITY
                                               GLASS TUBING
                                                    AIR AND MERCURY VAPOR OUT
                                                     RUBBER STOPPER
                                                         300 ml.
                                                        "BOD BOTTLE
                                Figure 1.  Aeration Bottle
   spectrophotometer is being used, the
   desiccant can be replaced with a small
   60 watt lamp.  This is positioned to shine
   on the tube itself to raise the temperature
   inside the tube thus preventing condensation.
   Next in the flow path after the desiccant
   would come the absorption cell,  or
   instrument.

   In the open mode a trap for the mercury
   vapors would follow the absorption tube.
   In the closed mode a valve would follow.
   The position of each of these pieces can
   be seen in Figure 2.

   The absorption tube or cell can be a
   standard spectrophotometer cell that is
   10 cm long and having quartz end windows.
   Suitable cells may be constructed from
   plexiglass tubing 1 inch outside diameter
   and 4| inches long.  The ends are ground
   perpendicular to the longitudinal axis and
   quartz windows 1 inch in diameter and
   one sixteenth of an inch thick are cemented
   in place.  Gas inlet and outlet ports (also
   of plexiglass but 5-  inch outside diameter)
   are attached approximately f- inch from
   each end.
C  Instrumentation

   Any atomic absorption spectrophotometer
   having an open sample presentation area
   in which the absorption tube can be mounted
   is suitable.  The absorption tube is strapped
   to a burner for support and aligned in the
   beam by use of two 2x2 cards.  One inch
   diameter holes are cut in the center of each
   card; the cards are placed over each end
   of the cell.  The cell is then positioned
   and adjusted vertically and horizontally to
   give the maximum transmittance.

   There are available on the market instruments
   designed specifically for the determination
   of mercury by the flameless atomic absorption
   method.  Usually they are complete and
   contain the absorption tube and pump inside
   the instrument.  The main advantage'5" of
   these instruments is that they are  considerably
   cheaper than an atomic absorption instrument.
   However,  their chief disadvantage lies in
   the fact that they can be used only  for
   mercury while an atomic absorption
   instrument with some additional equipment
   (lamps) can be used for about 40 metals.
9-4

-------
                                             Determination of Mercury
              VALUI
           AMAIOI
             IVITIM ONI. UOUIO TRAP CLOUD ITITIM
                     VALUI
 AIRATOR
                SYSTEM TWO • SOLID TRAP CLOSID SYSTEM

                    TRAP
AIRATOR
  SYSTEM THREE • SOLID TBAP-pPEN SYSTEM

Figure 3.  Flow Systems
                                                                       9-5

-------
 Determination of Mercury
    There is also available an automated method
    which utilized the Technicon Auto Analyzer.
    This method is described in detail in the
    EPA Methods Manual.  The method is
    applicable to surface waters and may be
    applicable to saline water, wastewater
    effluents and domestic sewage providing
    potential interferences are not present.

    Regardless of what instrument is used,
    its calibration should be checked originally
    upon receipt and standards run each time
    samples are to be run in order to verify the
    calibration.  The standards are treated
    in the same method except that if no
    organic mercury is used as the standard,
    the heating step can be omitted.
REFERENCES

1  Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water
      and Wastes.  USEPA, Office of
      Technology Transfer, Washington, DC
      20460.   1974.

2  Hatch, W.  R.  and Ott,  W.  L.  Analytical
      Chemistry, 40, 2085.  December 1968.

3  Westoo. G.  Acta Chem. Scand.  22,
      2277-2280.   1968.
IV  SUMMARY

 The determination of the mercury content
 of waters has become a necessary analysis
 for the health of the consuming public.  The
 method of choice has become the flameless
 atomic absorption procedure.  Besides being
 simple to perform it is  sensitive enough to
 determine the limit set  for the permissible
 content of mercury in water.

 The method can be carried out on any atomic
 absorption instrument that has enough physical
 space in its burner compartment in which to
 install the absorption cell.  However, there
 are available on the market, instruments
 designed specifically to determine mercury
 via the flameless method.  These instruments
 are generally considerably less  expensive
 than a conventional atomic absorption
 spectrophotometer but have the drawback
 of being able to be  used for only that
 determination.
This outline was prepared by J. D. Pfaff,
National Training Center, MOTD, OWPO,
USEPA,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268.
Descriptors: Heavy Metals,' Mercury,  Water
Pollution, Chemical Analysis,  Metals,
Spectroscopy, Spectrophotometers
9-6

-------
                                DETERMINATION OF LEAD
 I   INTRODUCTION

 Lead (Pb) is a serious cumulative body poison;
 it is well known for its toxicity in both acute
 and chronic exposures.  In technologically
 developed countries the widespread use of lead
 multiplies the risk of exposure of the  population
 to excessive levels.  For this  reason, constant
 ourveillance of the lead exposure of the general
 population via food, air and water is necessary.

 The presence of lead in water  may arise from
 industrial,  mine and smelter discharges, or
 from the dissolution of old lead plumbing.
 Tap waters which are soft,  acid, and not
 suitably treated may contain lead resulting
 from an attack on the lead service pipes.
 Lake and river waters of the United States
 usually contain less than 0. 05  mg/1  of lead,
 although concentrations in excess of this
 have been reported.  Young children present
 a special case in lead intoxication both in
 terms of tolerated intake and the severity of
 the symptoms.  The most prevalent source
 of lead poisoning of children up to three years
 of age has been lead-containing paint still
 found in some older homes.

 Because of the toxicity of lead  to humans and
 because there is little information on the
 effectiveness of treatment processes in
 decreasing lead concentrations, it has been
 recommended that 0. 05 mg/1 of lead not be
 exceeded in public water supply sources.
 This number then would tend to set the limit
 for any analytical method which might be
 under consideration for use in  analyzing for
 lead.
II   METHODS

 The methods used to analyze for lead are,
 in general,  the same as those of any other
 heavy metal.  However,  there is no method
 for lead similar to the flameless method for
 mercury.  The method recommended by the
 USEPA Methods manual is an atomic  absorption
 method utilizing a concentration-of the lead
 content by a chelating-extraction procedure.
Other methods are available for those who
are not bound to use the USEPA method,

A Dithizone

   This method has been used for many years
   for the determination of many of the  heavy
   metals including lead.  Dithizone dissolved
   in carbon tetrachlorlde will extract lead
   from a slightly basi'c  (8.  5-9.0)  solution.
   The lead and dithizone form a metal  complex,
   lead dithizonate, which is soluable in carbon
   tetrachloride,  with the formation of a red
   color.  Measurement of the amount of red
   color formed yields an estimation of the
   lead present.

   The method has sufficient sensitivity to
   meet the standard limit of 0. 05 mg/1.
   Standard Methods gives the approximate
   minimum detection limit  in water as 2 y g
   of Pb.  The main drnwback of the method
   is in the  many operations the analyst must
   perform.  The precision  and accuracy of
   the method can suffer greatly due to the
   analyst's handling of the various  operations.
   Analysts with long experience with the
   method have been able to produce acceptable
   results.

   The procedure for the dithizone method for
   normal drinking waters,  low in organic
   matter and tin, is brief and adequate.
   However, for industrial wastes and waters
   containing high organic concentrations  a
   pretreatment step must be added.  This
   additional step is  a digestion procedure,
   either with a mixture of nitric and sulfuric
   acids or, when the organic matter is difficult
   to oxidize,  with nitric and perchloric acids.
   This procedure can introduce even more
   error in loss of the metals during heating  to
   dryness and is even hazardous if not  followed
   closely.

B  Other Instrumental Methods

   There are other instrumental methods
   available even  when atomic absorption is
   excluded.  These methods would  include
 CH.ME.pb. 5. 1.76
                                    10-1

-------
Determination of Lead
   polarography, emission spectroscopy,
   neutron activation and x-ray fluorescence.
   '  ic i 'ns its own strong and weak points.
   ..lust o.   expensive Lo the point of exclusion
   in most laboratories but can be used to
   determine the concentration of lead in a
   sample.

C  Atomic Absorption

   Most metals,  including lead, may be readily
   determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy.
   The method is usually simple,  rapid and
   applicable to a large number of metals in
   drinking,  surface and saline waters, and
   domestic and industrial wastes.  While
   drinking waters  may be analyzed directly,
   domestic and industrial wastes require
   processing to solubilize suspended material.
   Sludges and sediments and other  solid type
   samples may also be analyzed  after proper
   pretreatment.

   Detection  limits, sensitivity and  optimum
   ranges of  the metals will vary  with the
   various makes and models of satisfactory
   atomic absorption spectrophotometers.
   The data shown in Table 1, however,
   provide some indication of the  actual
   concentration ranges measurable with
   conventional  atomization.  In the majority
   of instances the  concentration range shown
   in the table may be  extended much lower
   with scale expansion and conversely extended
   upwards by using a less sensitive wavelength
   or by rotating the burner 90 degrees.
   Detection  limits may also be extended
   through concentration of the sample, through
   solvent extraction techniques and/or the
   use of the so called furnace techniques.
   The latter includes the heated graphite
   atomizer, the carbon rod and the tantalum
   strip accessories.  When using furnace
   techniques, however, the analyst should be
   cautioned  as to possible chemical reactions
   occurring at elevated temperatures which
   may result in either suppression or enhance-
   ment of the analysis element.  Methods of
   standard addition are mandatory  with these
   furnace techniques to insure valid data.

   For levels of lead below  100 jug/1,  an
   extraction procedure is recommended.
   This extraction procedure is carried out
   at a pH of 2. 8 which is the optimum pH
   for the extraction of lead.  However, if
   many of the metals are to be analyzed in
   the same sample, either larger sample
   volumes must be extracted or individual
   extractions made for each metal being
   determined.
Ill EXTRACTION PROCEDURE

 Extraction procedure with pyrrolidme
 dithiocarbamic acid (PDCA) in chloroform.

 A Transfer 200  ml of sample into a 250 ml
   separatory funnel, add 2 drops bromphenol
   blue indicator solution and mix.

 B Prepare a blank and sufficient standards in
   the same manner and  adjust the volume of
   each to approximately 200 ml with deionized
   distilled water.  All of the metals to be
   determined may be combined into single
   solutions at the appropriate concentration
   levels.

 C  Adjust the pH by addition of 2N NH4OH
    solution until a blue color persists.  Add
    HC1 dropwise until the blue color just
    disappears; then add  2. 0 ml HC1 in excess.
    The pH at this point should be 2. 3. (The
    pH adjustment may be made with a pH
    meter instead of using indicator.)
 D  Add 5 ml of PDCA-chloroform reagent
    and shake vigorously for 2 minutes.
    Allow the phases to separate and drain the
    chloroform layer into a 100  ml beaker.

 E  Add a second portion of 5 ml PDCA-chloroform
    reagent and  shake vigorously for
    2 minutes.  Allow the phases to  separate and
    combine the chloroform phase with that
    obtained in step (D).

 F  Determine the pH of the aqueous phase and
    adjust to 4. 5.

 G  Repeat step (D) again combining the solvent
    extracts.

 H  Readjust the pH to 5. 5,  extract, readjust to
    6. 5 and extract a fifth time.  Combine all
    extracts and evaporate to dryness  on a steam
    bath.
   10-2

-------
                                                                             Determination  of Lead,
TAIJt (• I
Atomic Al'soipt ion O'Hccnluiion
Convention:.! Atnu'j/.alion
Ranges With
. * i

Opliinuin


Metal
Aluminum
Antimony
Afteillf1'
Baiium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Giluum
Oiroiiinim
Co baH
Coppci
lion
Lead
Magnesium
ManpaiirA;
Mcruiiv '
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium'
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Titanium
V.in.nlmm
/'.n<.
Detection
Limit
mg/I
0.1
02
0.002
003
0.005
0.002
0.003
00?
003
001
002
005
0.0005
001
00002
0 1
oo;.
0 005
0.002
001
0.002
0.1
0.8
0.3
0.2
0005
Com,entrdlio;i
Sensitivity
nip/I
1
OS
-
04
0025
0025
0.08
0.1
02
0 1
012
0<
0007
005
-
03
OIS
004
-
006
0.015
0.5
4
2
08
00?
Range
mg/1
5
1
0 002
1
00?
005
0.2
0.2
05
02
03
1
002
01
0 0002 -
05
03
01
0002
0.1
0.03
1
10
5 , -
1
005


100
40
002
20
2
2
20
10
10
10
10
'"O
2
10
001
20
10
2
0.02
4
1
20
200
100
100
2
   Hr.iseoii'- livuiiilc method.
 * TolJ v.ijvi leclinique
**' flu- coin niir.ilions ihown abovi; jie nol contrived v.ilu
(Aiinuilioiial j'.psi it ion on any sjii-.r.iUory .''oniit iibsorpl
tit, and \houli) be obtainable with
•in speclrophotomctcr
                                                                                                    10-3

-------
  Determination oi Load
 I  Hold the beaker at a 45 degree angle, and
    slowly add 2 ml of cone,  distilled nitric
    acid,  rotating the beaker to effect thorough
    contact of the acid with the residue.

 J  Place the beaker on a low temperature
    hotplate and evaporate just to dryness.

 K  Add 2 ml of nitric acid (1-1) to the beaker
    and heat for 1 minute.  Cool,  quantitatively
    transfer the solution to a 10 ml volumetric
    flask and bring to volume with distilled
    water.  The sample is now ready for
    analysis.
in solids or having a concentration of lead
below 100 jug/1 the extraction procedure
should be used to enhance the detection
capabilities.
REFERENCES

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
   and Wastewater,  13th Ed.  1971.

Methods for Chemical Analysis  of Water and
   Wastes.   1974.
IV  SUMMARY

 The method of choice for the determination of
 lead is the atomic absorption spectroscopy
 method.  In waters that are relatively clean,
 such as drinking water, the lead can be
 determined by direct aspiration of the sample
 into the instrument.  However, for water high
This outline was prepared by J.  D.  Pfaff,
National Training Center,  MOTD, OWPO,
USEPA,  Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.

Descriptors:  Lead, Metals,- Water  Pollution,
Heavy Metals, Spectroscopy,  Spectrophotometer
Chemical Analysis
 10-4

-------
                             BURNERS AND FUEL MIXTURES
 I   INTRODUCTION

 The object of the burner and its fuel and
 oxidant gases on an atomic absorption
 spectrophotometer is to produce in the flame
 a  supply of dissociated atoms in their ground
 or unexcited state.  These atoms will then
 be available to absorb the energy provided by
 the hollow cathode lamp.
II   BURNERS

 There are generally two classifications of
 burners for atomic absorption.  These are
 the total consumption burner and the pre-mix
 or laminar flow burner.  These burners have
 been covered in the outline on the Fundamentals
 of Atomic Absorption.  This outline includes
 diagrammatic drawings of the two types.

 The total consumption burner is primarily
 used in flame photometry and when atomic
 absorption came into existence the first
 attempt was to use this type burner.  However,
 it has some severe limitations when applied
 to atomic absorption.  Consequently, experi-
 mentation with various forms of burners led
 to what is now the pre-mix or laminar burner.

 Most manufacturers today use the pre-mix
 type burner with some different modifications
 as the standard burner on their atomic
 absorption instruments. These burners are
 a three part system.  They contain an
 independent nebulizer for sample introduction,
 a pre-mix chamber and a burner head.

 Any burner design whether  different by principle
 or manufacturer's design should have certain
 criteria.  The burner should be stable, its
 absorption for a given concentration should
 remain constant for as long as is possible.
 A burner  should also be quiet,  both audibly
 and instrumentally and not cause fluttering or
 wavering  in the output.  Burners should have
 as little carry over from one sample to the
 next.  They should also be easy to clean and
 not easily corroded.
Usually the pre-mix type of burner will have
the better results when the above criteria is
compared between it and the total consumption
burner.  All these parameters can  also vary
from manufacturer to manufacturer and thought
should be given when a new  instrument is
contemplated or accessory equipment for
existing instrumentation purchased.

A  Nebulizer

   The nebulizer is simply a device used to
   asperate the sample into the burner and
   from there into the flame.   This device
   works on a venturi effect with the oxidant
   being moved across the tip of a stainless
   steel capillary tube. This  causes a pressure
   drop along the capillary's length.  When
   the other end of the tube  is immersed in
   a liquid, that liquid will be drawn through
   the tube and discharged in the oxidant
   stream where it is blown into a fine aerosol.

   The rate of asperation is controlled by
   adjusting the position of the end of the
   capillary with respect to the oxidant flow.
   A typical optimum flow rate is approximately
   5 milliliters per minute.   Most manufacturers
   provide some kind of adjustment device
   usually located on the front of the burner
   which is used to adjust the  flow rate.

B  Pre-Mix Chamber

   When the sample leaves; *he nebulizer' section,
   it is. mixed with more oxidant and fuel and
   mixed again in the body of the burner,itself.
   All droplets of sample too heavy to progress
   into the burner head are  collected by the
   baffling and sides of the burner and flow down
   the drain into the waste colleq^on vessel.
   This wasted portion':of!jtBJi'^«y>le can
   typically amount to.Ifinety'percent of that
   asperated into the%urner.  The pre-mix
   section should be made of some material
   which will resist corrosion.
                            f,-

   The drain outlet of the burner should be
   connected to some type of-drain receptacle
CH.MET.aa. 5. 1.76
                                    11-1

-------
Burners and Fuel Mixtures
   lower than the instrument itself.  The
   manufacturer's directions for connecting
   this drain should be followed closely-
   most instruments provide a positive water
   seal  somewhere in the system.  This is
   done to prevent flashbacks in the burner.
   Care should also be taken to follow the
   ••Manufacturer' s directions for cleaning
   both  the nebulizer, mixing chamber, and
   burner head.

C  burner Head

   Che third part of the burner is the burner
   head.  Most instruments are so designed
   to allow a quick change of the head,  of
   course caution  should be taken that the
   head being removed has had sufficient time
   to cool.  In most cases the burner head and
   burner body have some locking device which
   will not allow certain type heads to be used
   with  various  gas mixes. For example,  the
   Boling head  should not be used with  nitrous
   oxide-acetylene gases and the collar or
   locking device helps  to prevent this  from
   accidentally being done.

   There are basically three types of burner
   heads with many variations of these three
   for specific  needs.  This is partially due to
   the manufacturers finding new ways to
   improve  the design of the heads.  The three
   types of heads are the Boling head,  the
   nitrous oxide head and a type of burner head
   designed to allow the analysis of samples
   with  high solids content.

   1   Boling burner head (Figure 1)

      The Boling burner is distinctive  in
     appearance, having three separate
     longitudinal orifices or slits at the top
     of a compressed chamber with a triangular
     cross  section.  This design provides a
     long,  flat flame which is actually composed
     of three flames which are separately
     supported and distinct at the base.  This
     burner can be used  with  air-acetylene,
     air-hydrogen, air-propane or argon-
     hydrogen flames.  It can burn concentrated
     solutions  without clogging and provides
     better sensitivities for many metals.
     Many  manufacturers provide this burner
     head as the standard head for their
     instruments.

 11-2
             Figure 1
        Boling Burner Head

2  Nitrous oxide head

   The nitrous  oxide burner head is, as its
   name implies,- used for elements which
   need the hotter flame to atomize and for
   the metals which readily form oxides in
   the flame and for the rare earth elements.
   The elements included in the USEPA
   manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis
   of Water and Wastes that are to be
   determined by atomic absorption are
   listed in Table I.  There are six elements
   that must be determined by the use of
   the nitrous  oxide-acetylene flame in order
   to attain sufficient sensitivities to meet
   the NPDES  standards.

   Figures 2 and 3 show two types of nitrous
   oxide heads. They are both characterized
   by a thick head and a short slot (5 cm).
   Instrumentation Laboratory adds fins
   on both sides of the head to aid in cooling
   and two trenches along the slot to increase
   ambient air  flow and reduce carbon
   buildup.
             Figure 2
   Instrumentation Laboratory
    Nitrous Oxide Burner Head

-------
                                                               Burners and Fuel Mixtures
                Figure 3
             Perkin-Elmer
       Nitrous Oxide Burner Head

    3  High solids head

       This head looks similar to the nitrous
       oxide head with the main difference being
       the slot.  The slot on the high solids
       burner is both longer and wider.  The
       prime purpose of this burner head is to
       allow analysis of one element in the
       presence of overwhelming amounts of
       another element. The head should be
       used with the air-acetylene flame and
       not with the nitrous oxide as danger of
       flash-back would exist. Other heads are
       made for more specific purposes by
       each manufacturer and reference should
       be made to the particular literature of
       the manufacturer of the burner head.
ill  GASES (FUEL AND OXIDANT)

 Table I shows that for the metals listed in the
 Federal Register as being capable of analysis
 by atomic absorption, only two fuel oxidant
 mixtures are listed.  Nitrous oxide and
 acetylene-air can be used to analyze most of
 the metals.  The air- acetylene combination
 is not hot enough to dissociate most of the
 compounds of a number of elements such as
 aluminum, boron and silicon, and it incompletely
 dissociates those of other metals like chromium,
 molybdenum and  barium.  An additional problem
 is that the refractory elements are quick to
 form stable oxides.
 Some exceptions are noted to the fuel mixtures
 noted above,  These metals are easily
 dissociated and other means can be used.  For
 example, the analysis of mercury is accomplished
 without a flame and arsenic and solenium are
 done using an argon-hydron flame in the gaseous
 hydride procedure.

 When using the nitrous oxide-acetylene  flame
 a note on the safety of operation should be added.
 Although not difficult to use, with modern
 atomic absorption instruments this gas combi-
 nation is somewhat  more likely to flash-back
 than air-acetylene when not used in accordance
 with instructions.       5

 Table I in the outline on the Fundamentals of
 Atomic Absorption gives the burning temperatures
 of most fuel oxidant mixtures.  Some of the
 combinations are not used in atomic absorption
 but  are included as  a means of comparison.
IV  SUMMARY

 Each manufacturer of atomic absorption
 instrumentation equips its instruments with a
 standard burner head.  Should the user desire,
 he can purchase additional burner heads.  These
 are equipped with a common connector to the
 burner body and no great problem exists to
 change from one head to another. There are
 basically two burners, the total consumption
 and the laminar flow or pre-mix type.

 The pre-mix type can utilize a number of heads
 such as the Boling,  nitrous oxide or high solids
 each of which have specific uses.

 Table I shows the metal elements of which the
 NPDES program permits analysis by atomic
 absorption and the fuel oxidant mixture
 recommended for its analysis.  Two  mixtures
 are of primary importance,  that is the air-
 acetylene and nitrous oxide-acetylene mixtures.
                                                                                     11-3

-------
I'.urners and Fuel Mixtures
                                        TABLE I
                           Methods in USEPA Methods Manual
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1,-i
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Titanium
Vanadium
Zinc
Nitrous Oxide
Air
Gaseous Hydride Method
Nitrous Oxide
Nitrous Oxide
Air
Air
Nitrous Oxide
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Air
Cold Vapor Technique
Nitrous Oxide
Air
Air
Gaseous Hydride Method
Air
Air
Air
Air
Nitrous Oxide
Nitrous Oxide
Air
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
/Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
Acetylene
11-4

-------
                                                         Burners and Fuel Mixture a
REFERENCES                                 This outline was prepared by J, D, Pfaff,
                                              National Training Center, MOTD, OWPO,
1  Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis      USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268,
     of Water and Wastes,  USEPA,  Cincinnati,
     Ohio,  1974.

2  Instruction Handbook, Instrumentation
     Laboratory, Inc.

3  Operation Instruction,  Perkin-Elmer Co.

4  Kahn, Herbert L,  Principles and  Practice     Descriptors:  Spectroscopy, Spectrophotometere
     of Atomic Absorption, Advances in
     Chemistry Series, Number 73.   1968.

5  Steensrud. James A,  Choosing an A. A.
     Spectrophotometer.  Research/Develop-
     ment.  August 1975.
                                                                                 11-5

-------
                     FLAME PHOTOMETRY LABORATORY (SODIUM)
  I   REAGENTS

  A  Deionized Distilled Water

     To be used for the preparation of all reagents,
     calibration standards, and as dilution water.

  B  Stock Sodium Solution

     Dissolve  2. 542 g of NaCl, previously
     dried at 140°C. in deionized distilled
     water and dilute to 1000 ml.

     1.00 ml = 1.00 mgNa+

  C  Intermediate Sodium Solution

     Dilute 10. 00 ml of the stock sodium solution
     to 100.0 ml with deionized distilled water.
     Use this solution for  preparing the
     calibration curve in the sodium range of
     1-10 mg/1.

     1.00 ml = 100/ug Na+

  D  Standard  Sodium Solution

     Dilute 10. 00 ml of the intermediate
     sodium solution to 100 ml with deionized
     distilled water.  Use this solution for
     preparing the calibration curve  in the
     sodium range of 0. 1-1. 0 mg/1.

     1.00 ml = 10.0ngNa+
 II  INTERFERENCE CONTROL

  Refer to the cited reference


III  STANDARDS

  Standards may be prepared in any of these
  applicable ranges: 0-1.0,  0-10, or
  0- 100 mg/1.
IV  INSTRUMENT OPERATING CONDITIONS

 Theoretical wavelength 589 nm

 Fuel pressure 7.5 lbs/in2

 Oxygen pressure 10 lbs/in^

 For all other conditions needed, consult the
 manufacturer's instrument manual.


 V  PROCEDURE

  1 Number the six plastic cups provided 0,
    2,  4,  6,  8, and 10.

  2 Fill them 3/4 full with the appropriate
    sodium standards; e.g., 0 mg/1 standard
    into cup 0,  etc.

  3 Fill a 7th plastic cup 3/4 full with the
    unknown.

  4 Fill an 8th plastic  cup with distilled water.

  5 The power toggle switch (on left side of
    instrument) is already turned on.

  6 Set the sensitivity  knob to the standby
    position.

  7 Set the wavelength knob to the theoretical
    valve  of 589 nm (the scale is at the top of
    the instrument).

  8 The fltr - shtr - open knob is in the shtr
    (closed) position.

  9 Open the main valve on the oxygen cylinder;
    all other oxygen  gauges are already set.

 10 Open the main valve on the hydrogen
    cylinder; all other hydrogen gauges are
    already set.
 CH. MET. lab. 2b. 1.76
                                     12-1

-------
 Flame Photometry Laboratory (Sodium)
 11 Raise the door on the right side of the
   burner  housing (behind instrument).

 12 Cautiously bring a lighted match to the
   tip of the burner in the housing.

 13 Close the door on the burner housing.

 14 Caution  Do not  place any part of your body
   over the coils on the top of the burner
   housing.  Hot gases are escaping.

 15 Raise the silver  lever between the instru-
   ment and the burner housing to the vertical
   position.

 16 Place the plastic cup containing distilled
   water in the cup  holder which is now
   exposed at the right side of the burner
   housing.

 17 Push the silver lever clockwise so that
   the cup holder swings into the burner
   housing and the water is aspirated.  A
   distinct difference in sound will be noticed
   when water or a  sample is being aspirated.
   If at any time during the determination
   this sound again  changes,  it will indicate
   that all of the liquid has been aspirated
   from the cup.  Simply move the silver
   lever and refill the cup with the appropriate
   liquid.

 18 Do not allow air  to be aspirated for more
   than about 15 seconds. If there is any
   delay, aspirate distilled water until the
   problem causing the  delay has been
   corrected.

 19 Turn the sensitivity knob to position 1.

 20 Turn the dark current knob until the needle
   reads 0 on the percent transmittance scale.

'21 Turn the sensitivity knob to position 4.

 22 Repeat  step 20.

 2!) Swing the cup of  distilled water out of the
   burner  housing and replace it with cup 10.
   Swing this cup back into the burner housing.

 24 Turn the fltr - shtr - open knob to the open
   position (this opens the shutter).
25 Turn the wavelength knob slowly to the left;
   the needle will move to the left.

26 At some point the needle will suddenly
   swing toward the right.  It will probably be
   necessary to make adjustments with the  slit
   knob in  order to keep the needle on-scale
   while finding the point at which the needle
   swings back to the right.  Record  this wave-
   length.  It is the peak wavelength.   Do not
   change this setting until indicated  in the
   instructions.

27 If the point at which the needle swings back
   to the right is overshot turn the wavelength
   knob about 1/4 turn to the right and repeat
   steps 25 and 26.

28 Make the needle read 100% transmittance
   by turning the slit knob.  Record the slit
   mm reading. Do not change this setting, *
   100 is the peak transmittance reading
   for this solution.

29 Turn the fltr - shtr - open knob to the shtr
   position (this closes the  shutter).

30 Replace cup 10  with cup  8.

31 Open the shutter.

32 Record  the percent transmittance  reading
   and close the shutter.

33 Repeat  steps 30,  31,  and 32 using cups
   6, 4,  2, 0, and the unknown, in turn.

34 Aspirate distilled water  and using the dark
   current knob make  the needle read 0 percent
   transmittance.

35 Aspirate cup 10.

36 Open the shutter.

37 Slowly turn the wavelength knob to the left.
   The needle will move to  the right  and at
   about 1/4-1 percent transmittance will
   move no further to  the right.  Record the
   wavelength reading.  This is the background
   wavelength.  Do not change this setting.
   The percent transmittance is the background
   reading for this solution.
 12-2

-------
                                                  Flame photometry Laboratory (Sodium)
38 If the point at which the needle moves no
   further to the right ia overshot,  turn the
   wavelength about 1/4 turn to the right and
   repeat step 37.

39 Close the shutter.

40 Replace cup 10 with cup 8.

41 Open the shutter.

42 Record the background transmittance
   reading  for this solution.

43 Close the shutter.

44 Repeat steps 40,  41, 42, and 43 using
   cups 6,  4, 2,  0,  and the unknown,  in turn.

45 Aspirate distilled water for about 15 sec.

46 Turn the sensitivity knob to the standby
   position.

47 Close the main valve on the hydrogen
   cylinder.
50 Leave the power toggle switch (on left
   side of instrument) on.

51 For each of the 6 solutions subtract the
   background percent transmittance reading
   from the peak percent transmittance
   reading.

52 Using the graph paper provided in the
   manual, plot the 6 differences vs. the
   appropriate concentrations.  Draw the
   line to best fit connecting the 6 points,
   This is the calibration graph.

53 Find the difference percent transmittance
   for the unknown on the percent trans-
   mittance axis.

54 Draw a straight line to the right until it
   intersects the calibration line.

 55 From the point of intersection draw a  line
   straight down to the  concentration axis.

 56 This is the concentration of the unknown,
48 Close the main valve on the oxygen cylinder.     REFERENCE
49 Empty the eight plastic cups and discard
   them.
 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
   and Wastewater, 13th Edition,  page 317,
   Method 15 3A.  1971.
                                                                                    12-3

-------
Flame Photometry Laboratory (Sodium)
                                               Percent Transmission Readings









                                       Background      Peak         Difference







            O.Omg/1                    	    	    	









            2.0 mg/1                    	    	    	









            4. 0 mg/1









            6.0mg/l                    	    	    	









            8.0 mg/1                    	









            10.0 mg/1                   	    	









            Sample
12-4

-------
                                               Flame Photometry Laboratory (Sodium)
  'H
   a
.._Q
  -**
   K
   B
   3
 ~t=r-
 '  t-*
   D
1  U I  II
'Mil'
'   Ml.
  H-i!l
                                                                     -  .
                                                                       ;
                                                                                 0
                                                                                v>
                                                                       	   CM
                                                                                  12-5

-------
Florne Photometry Laboratory (Sodium)
 This outline was prepared by C.  R. Feldmann,     Descriptors:  Chemical Analysis,  Laboratory
 National Training Center, MOTD,  OWPO,         Tests, Water Analysis, Sodium, Alkali Metals,
 USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.                  Metals
12-6

-------
                     FLAME PHOTOMETRY LABORATORY (STRONTIUM)
  I   GENERAL

  This procedure is listed as being "tentative"
  in the cited reference.  Also, strontium is
  not listed in Table I of the Federal Register,
  Volume 38, Number 199, Tuesday, October  16,
  1973; i.e., as of October 16,  1973,  strontium
  is not included in the National Pollutant
  Discharge Elimination System.
 II   REAGENTS

  A  Fifty percent by volume hydrochloric acid

  B  NH4OH, 3N

  C  Stock Strontium Solution

     Weigh 1. 685 g of anhydrous SrCO3 and
     place it in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask.
     Place a small funnel in the neck of the
     flask and add 50% HC1 slowly until all of
     the SrCO3 has dissolved.  Add 200 ml of
     distilled water and boil for a few minutes
     to expel CO2«  Cool and add a few drops
     of methyl red indicator.  Adjust to the
     intermediate orange color by adding 50%
     by volume HC1 or 3N NH4OH.  Transfer
     quantitatively to a 1 liter volumetric
     flask and dilute to the mark with distilled
     water.

     1.00  ml =  1.00 mg Sr+ 2

  D  Standard Strontium Solution

     Dilute 25.00 nil of stock strontium solution
     to 1000 ml with distilled water.  Use this
     solution for preparing Sr standards in the
     1-25 mg/1 range.

     1.00 ml =  25.0 yg Sr* 2
III  INTERFERENCE CONTROL

  The radiation effect of possible interfering
  substances is equalized throughout the
  standards by use of the standard addition
  technique.
IV  INSTRUMENT OPERATING CONDITIONS

 Theoretical wavelength 460. 7 nm

 Fuel pressure 7. 5 lbs/in2

 Oxygen pressure 10 lbs/in2

 For all other conditions needed, consult the
 manufacturer's instrument manual.
 V  PROCEDURE

  1 Number the five volumetric flasks provided
    0,  5,  10,  15, and 20.

  2 into each of the five, pipette 10. 0 ml of the
    unknown.

  3 Using a clean pipette, add  10. 0 ml of the
    0 mg/1 standard into flask  0.

  4 Again using a clean pipette, add 10.0 ml
    of the 5 mg/1 standard into flask 5.

  5 Proceed in a similar manner using the 10,
    15,  and 20 mg/1 standards  and flasks 10,
    15,  and 20.

  6 Stopper and shake all five flasks.

  7 Mark five plastic cups 0, 5,  10,  15, and 20.

  8 Fill the plastic cups about  3/4 full with the
    appropriate solutions from the volumetric
    flasks.

  9 Fill a 6th plastic cup with distilled water.

 10 The power toggle switch (on left side of
    instrument) is already turned on.

 11 Set the sensitivity knob to the standby
    position.

 12 Set the phototube voltage knob (on right side
    of instrument) to position E.

 13 Set the wavelength knob to  the theoretical
    value of 461 nm (the scale is at the  top of
    the instrument).
 CH. MET. lab. 3c. 1.76
                                      13-1

-------
Flame Photometry Laboratory (Strontium)
14 Set the fltr - shtr - open knob in the shtr
   position (closed position).

15 Open the main valve on the oxygen cylinder;
   all other oxygen gauges are already set.

16 Open the main valve on the hydrogen
   cylinder; all other hydrogen gauges are
   already set.

17 Raise the door on the right side of the
   burner housing (behind instrument).

18 Cautiously bring a lighted match to the tip
   of the burner in the housing.

19 Close the door on the right side of the
   burner housing.

20 Caution  Do not place any part of your
   body over the coils on the top of the burner
   housing.  Hot gases are escaping.

21 Raise the silver lever between the
   instrument and the burner housing to
   the vertical position.

22 Place the plastic cup containing distilled
   water in the cup holder which is now
   exposed at the right side of the burner
   housing.

23 Push the silver lever clockwise so that
   the cup holder swings into the burner
   housing and the water is aspirated. A
   distinct difference in sound will be noticed
   when water or a sample is being aspirated.
   If at any time during the determination
   this sound again changes,  it will indicate
   that all of the liquid has been aspirated
   from the cup.  Simply move the silver
   lever and refill the cup with the appropriate
   liquid.

24 Do not allow air to be aspirated for more
   than about 15  sec.  If there is any delay,
   aspirate distilled water until the problem
   causing the delay has been  corrected.

25 Turn the sensitivity knob to position  1.

26 Turn the dark current knob until the
   needle reads 0 on the percent transmittance
   scale.
27 Turn the sensitivity knob to position 4.

28 Repeat step 26.

29 Swing the cup of distilled water out of the
   burner housing and replace it with cup 20.
   Swing this cup back into the burner housing.

30 Turn the fltr - shtr - open knob to the  open
   position (this opens the shutter).

31 Turn the wavelength knob slowly to the
   left; the needle will move to the left.  ,

32 At some point the needle will  suddenly
   swing toward the right.  It will probably
   be necessary to make adjustments with
   the slit knob in order to keep  the needle
   on-scale while finding the point at which
   the needle swings back to the  right.   Record
   this wavelength.  It is the peak wavelength.
   Do not change this  setting until indicated
   in the instructions.

33 if the point at which the needle swings back
   to the right is overshot, turn  the wave-
   length knob about £ turn to the right and
   repeat steps 31 and 32.

34 Make the  needle read 100%  transmittance
   by turning the slit knob. Record the  slit
   mm reading.  Do not change tins setting.
   100 is the peak percent transmittance
   reading for this solution.

35 Turn the fltr - shtr - open knob to the  shtr.
   position (this closes the shutter).

36 Replace the cup 20 with 15.

37 Open the shutter.

38 Record the percent transmittance reading.

39 Close the shutter.

40 Repeat steps  36, 37,  38, and  39,  using
   cups 10, 5,  and 0 in turn.

41 Aspirate distilled water and using the dark
   current knob make the needle read 0  percent
   transmittance.

42 Aspirate cup 20.
13-2

-------
                                                  Flame Photometry Laboratory (Strontium)
43 Open the shutter.

44 Slowly turn the wavelength knob to the left.
   The needle will move to the right and at
   about 10 - 30 percent transmittance will
   move no farther to the right.  Record the
   wavelength reading.   This is the back-
   ground wavelength.  Do not change this
   setting.  The percent transmittance  is
   the background reading for this  solution.

45 If the point at which the needle moves no
   farther to the right is overshot,  turn the
   wavelength about \ turn to the right and
   repeat step 44.

46 Close the  shutter.

47 Replace cup 20 with cup 15.

48 Open the shutter.

49 Record the background transmittance
   reading for the solution.

50 Close the  shutter.

51 Repeat steps 47,  48, 49, and 50 using
   cup 10,  5, and 0 in turn.

52 Aspirate distilled water for about 15 sec.

53 Turn the sensitivity knob to the standby
   position.

54 Close the main valve on the hydrogen
   cylinder.
                                  i
55 Close the main valve on the oxygen cylinder.

56 Empty all  six plastic cups and discard them.

57 Leave the  power toggle switch (on left side
   of instrument) on.
58 For each of the 5 solutions, subtract the
   background percent transmittance reading
   from the peak percent transmittance
   reading.

59 Using the graph paper provided in the
   manual, plot the 5 differences vs. the
   appropriate concentrations. Draw a
   straight line connecting the five points.
   This is the calibration graph.

60 Double the difference value obtained for the
   solution in cup 0.

61 Find the value on the percent transmission
   axis.

62 Draw a straight line to the right until it
   intersects the calibration line.

63 From the point of intersection, draw a  line
   straight down to the horizontal axis.

64 This is the concentration of the unknown.
REFERENCE

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
   and Wastewater,  13th Edition,  page 328,
   Method 155A.   1971.
                                                                                      13-3

-------
Flame Photometry Laboratory (Strontium)
                                             Percent Transmission Readings
           10. 0 ml unknown




           10.0 ml 0.0 mg/1 std.







           10.0 ml unknown




           10. 0 ml 5.0 mg/1 std.







           10. 0 ml unknown




           10.0 ml 10.0 mg/1 std.







           10.0 ml unknown




           10.0 ml 15.0 mg/1 std.







           10.0 ml unknown




           10.0 ml 20.0 mg/1 std.
                                      Background
Peak
Difference
13-4

-------
<
                                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                                             CM
                                                                                                                           " n
    10X10

-------
Flame Photometry Laboratory (Strontium)
This outline was prepared by C.  R.  Feldmann,     Descriptors   Chemical Analysis, Laboratory
National Training Center, MOTD, OWPO,         Tests, Water Analysis,  Strontium,  Alkaline
USEPA,  Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.                  Earth Metals,  Metals

-------
                     LABORATORY PROCEDURE FOR TOTAL HARDNESS
I  REAGENTS

A  Buffer Solution:

   1  Dissolve 16. 9 g of NH  Cl in 143 ml of
      cone.  NH OH.       4

   2  Dissolve 1. 179 g of analytical reagent
      grade disodium ethylenediamine tetra-
      acetie acid  dihydrate(Na9EDTA-2H,O)
      and 0. 644 g of MgCl
      distilled water.
  9
6If
                           6IfO in 50 ml of
   3  Add the solution from (2) to the solution
      from (1) with mixing, and dilute to 250
      ml with distilled water.  Addition of
      small amounts of Na9EDTA'2H9O or
      Mgd9- 6H9O may be necessary to attain
      exact equivalence.

   4  The buffer should be stored in a plastic
      or resistant glass container tightly
      stoppered to prevent CO9 absorption
      and NH  loss.  Discard the buffer when
      1 or 2 ml  added to the  sample fails to
      produce a pH of 10. 0 + 0. 1 at the end
      point of the titration.

B Inhibitor:

   1  Most water samples do not require the
      use oe an inhibitor. In the presence of
      certain  interferring ions, however, an
      inhibitor may be needed to sharpen the
      endpoint color change.  Several types
      of inhibitors may be prepared or  pur-
      chased. Sodium cyanide, NaCN,  is one
      of the simpler inhibitors to use.

   2  Add 0. 25 g of powdered NaCN to  the
      sample  and adjust the pH to 9. 9-10. 1.
      Caution_: NaC_N is poisonous.  Use
      Targe amounts 67 waler wfien flushing
      solutions containing NaCN down the
      drain.   Do not acidify solutions contain-
      ing XaC'X; volatile, poisonous hydrogen
      cyanide, HCX, would be liberated.

C Indicator:

   1  Eriochro-ne Black-T dye (EBT) is use-
      ful for the determination.   Other  commer
      eial grades or laboratory formulations
      of the dye  are also satisfactory.
   2  Prepare the indicator in dry powder
     form by grinding together 0.5 g of the
     dye and  100 g of NaCl.

D  Standard Calcium Carbonate, CaCO...:
                                    o
   Weigh 1. 000 g of anhydrous,  primary
   standard grade CaCO, and transfer it to
   a  500 ml Erlenmeyer^lask.   Add 1:1 HC1
   (equal volumes of cone. HC1  and water)
   dropwise and with  swirling of the flask
   until the CaCO has dissolved  Bring
   the volume of  liquid to about  200 ml with
   water, boil a few seconds to  dispel CO,,
   cool,  and add  a few drops of  methyl rea
   indicator.  Adjust  the color of the  solution
   to an intermediate orange by the dropwise
   addition of  1-1 HC1 or 1:4 NH OH (1 volume
   o< cone. NH OH +  4 volumes of water).
   Transfer the solution quantitatively to a
   one liter volumetric flask and dilute to the
   mark with water.  (1.0 ml =  1.0 mgCaCO )
                                          o
E  Na2EDTA-2H2O (0.01 M):

   Dissolve 3. 723 g of the dry reagent gi ade
   Na EDTA-2H9O in distilled water and
   dilute to 1 liter.   1, 0 ml of the 0. 01  M
   solution =1.0 mg of CaOX.  Chsck the
   concentration  of this solution by titration
   against  the standard calcium carbonate
   solution as described in II below.
                      II   STANDARDIZATION OF THE Na0EDTA-
                          2H20:                          2

                       A  Dilute 25, 0 ml of CaCO,,  standard to about
                          50 ml with distilled water in a 125 ml
                          Erlenmeyer flask against a white background.

                       B  Add 1-2 ml of the buffer solution and check
                          the pH to ensure that it is 9. 9 to 10. 1.

                       C  Add approximately 0. 2 g  of the indicator.

                       D  Add the  Na EDTA-2H-O slowly and with
                          stirring until the color changes from a
                          rose to a blue color.  If the color change
                          is not sharp, repeat the determination
                          using the inhibitor.   If the endpoint is still
                          not sharp, prepare  a fresh supply of
                          indicator.

                       E  The titration should take  less than 5 minutes,
                          measured from the  time of bufier addition
CH.HAR.lab. 3c. 1.76
                                                                                        14-1

-------
 Laboratory Pi ocedure j[pr^TotalJHaydne&s	
 I1'  In an analysis of this- type it is advant-
    ageous to tarry out a preliminary, rapid
    titration in order to  determine approxi-
    mately how much titrant will be required.
    This is  accomplished by adding the
    Na2EDTA-2H2O at a fast dropwise rate
    until the color change is observed.
Ill  PROCEDURE

 Repeat steps II A through II F using sample
 in place of CaCO3 standard.   The amount of
 sample taken  should require less than 15 ml
 of Na  EDTA-2H O titrant.
IV  CALCULATION

 A Standardization of the Na2EDTA-2H2O-
                                               REFERENCES

                                               1  Standard Methods for t;.e Examination
                                                     of Water and Wastewater 13th Edition,
                                                     A P1IA, -AWWA-WPCF (1971)
                                                     p. 179, Method 122B.

                                               2  ASTM Standards, Part 23,  Water;
                                                    Atmospheric Analysis 1972
                                                    p. 170,  Method D1126-67.
                                                  Methods for Chemical Analysis of
                                                    Water and Wastes,  1974,
                                                    Environmental Protection Agency,
                                                    MDQARL, Cincinnati, OH.
ml of CaCO.^ equal to 1. 0 ml of the Na2EDTA-2H2O

             ml of CaCO

                                 required foFHEatlon
    /symbol B) -
    Total Hai dnrsh

    IT  i            /-  rv,  /i - Ax B x 1000
    Hardness as nig CaCOj/1 - mi of Sam7^g
                                               This outline was prepared by C.  R. Keldmann,
                                               Chemist, National Training Center, MOTD,
                                               OWPO, USEPA,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268.

                                               Descriptors.  Calcium, Calcium Carbonate,
A = ml of Na2EDTA 2H2O tor titration of sample Chemical Analysis,  nardness, Laboratoiy
                                               Tests,  Magnesium,  Water Analysis, Calcium
                                               Compounds
   14-2

-------