CONSTRUCTION GRANTS PROGRAM              VOLUMEll
INFORMATION
EPA-430/9-76-017b


appendixes 1-7
FEDERAL GUIDELINES


        STATE AND LOCAL
   PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
              JANUARY 1977
      U.S.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAM OPERATIONS
        MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
           WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                   MCD-43

-------
CONSTRUCTION GRANTS PROGRAM              VOLUME II
INFORMATION
EPA-430/9-76-017B

appendixes 1-7


FEDERAL GUIDELINES


        STATE AND LOCAL

   PRETREATMENT PROGRAMS
              JANUARY 1977
      U.S.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAM OPERATIONS
         MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                    MCD-43

-------
                 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                               FOREWORD
     In response to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
of 1972 (P.L. 92-500), this country has undertaken an unprecedented
program of cleaning up our Nation's waters.  There will be a substantial
investment by Federal, State, and. local governments as well as by private
industry in treatment works to achieve the goals of the Act.  It is
important that this investment in publicly owned treatment works (POTW's)
be protected from- damage and from interference with proper operation,
and that receiving waters be protected from pollutants which may pass
through the POTW.

     These guidelines were developed by the Environmental  Protection
Agency in accordance with Section 304(f) of the Act for the purpose of
assisting States and municipalities in carrying out programs under
Section 402 including NPDES permit requirements.  It is important to
note the clear requirements in the Act that there be both  national
pretreatment standards, Federally enforceable, and pretreatment guide-
lines to assist States and municipalities in developing local pretreat-
ment requirements.  The Environmental Protection Agency encourages the
establishment of local pretreatment requirements, tailored to local
conditions.

     The guidelines are a revision of the previous guidelines, "Pre-
treatment of Pollutants Introduced Into Publicly Owned Treatment Works."
Contained in this revision is additional technical information on
pollutants which may interfere with or pass through publicly owned
treatment works.  Also, guidance is presented to assist State and local
governments in developing their own pretreatment programs  to comply with
NPDES permit conditions.  The guidelines are the result of extensive
reviews and numerous field trips and discussions with EPA  Regional
Offices, industry, city, regional, State and interstate agencies.  .We
are extremely grateful for the cooperation of those who assisted in the
preparation of the guidelines.
                                             The Administrator

-------
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS
                          VOLUME II
Title
                                                       Page
APPENDIX I - PRETREATMENT STANDARDS

APPENDIX 2 - SECONDARD TREATMENT INFORMATION

   Secondary Treatment Information                     2-1

APPENDIX 3 - TEST PROCEDURES FOR ANALYSIS OF
             POLLUTANTS

   Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for         3-1
     Analysis of Pollutants

APPENDIX 4 - EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS

   Pretreatment Standards for Oil and Grease           4-1

APPENDIX 5 - POLLUTANT INTERFERENCE DATA

   Pollutant Interference Data                         5-1

APPENDIX 6 - POLLUTANT REMOVAL AND PASS THROUGH DATA

   Computer Report No. 1 - Summary of POTW Removal     6-1
     Data by EPA Region
   Computer Report No. 2 - POTW Categorization         6-2
   Computer Report No. 3 - POTW Removal Data,          6-4
     Reference Information
   Computer Report No. 4 - POTW Removal Data Analysis, 6-10
     24 hr. Composite - 6 Hr. Simultaneous Composite,
     Comparison of Results
   Computer Report No. 5 - POTW Removal Data Analysis, 6-16
     by Plant Category
   Computer Report No. 6 - Summary of POTW Removal     6-22
     Data
   Computer Report No. 7 - POTW Effluent Data Analysis 6-30
   Computer Report No. 8 - Summary of POTW Effluent    6-37
     Data
   Table 6-1 - Cumulative Frequency Distribution of    6-45
     Removal Data

-------
                      TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
                          VOLUME II

   Table 6-2 - Cumulative Frequency Distribution of    6-47
     Effluent Data
   Evaluation of Limited Data                          6-49

APPENDIX 7 - ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

   Section A - Introduction                            7-1
   Section B - Management of a Control Program         7-11
   Section C - Legal Aspects of a Control Program      7-19
   Section D - Monitoring                              7-28
   Section E - Pollutants which Interfere with         7-59
               Publicly Owned Treatment Works
   Section F - Removal of Pollutants in Publicly       7-94
               Owned Treatment Works

-------
        APPENDIX 1
  PRETREATMENT STANDARDS
Pretreatment Standards

-------
                          RESERVED

     The general pretreatment standards were published in
the Federal Register, November 8, 1973 (Vol. 38, p. 30982),
They are currently under review for possible revision, and
when changed will be proposed in the Federal Register.
                            1-1

-------
          APPENDIX 2
SECONDARY TREATMENT INFORMATION

-------
No. 159—Ft. II	1
                 FRIDAY, AUGUST 17, 1973
                 WASHINGTON, D.C.

                 Volume 38 • Number 159


                 PART II
                 ENVIRONMENTAL
                    PROTECTION
                      AGENCY
                   WATER PROGRAMS

                    Secondary Treatment
                       Information
                2-1

-------
  22298
RULES AND  REGULATIONS
    Title 40—Protection of Environment
      CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL
          PROTECTION AGENCY
     SUBCHAPTER  D—WATER  PROGRAMS
   PART  133—SECONDARY  TREATMENT
             INFORMATION
   On April 30,1973, notice  was published
 in the  FEDERAL  REGISTER  that the En-
 vironmental Protection Agency was pro-
 posing information on secondary treat-
 ment pursuant to section 304(d)(l)  of
 the  Federal .Water  Pollution Control
 Act  Amendments of 1972  (the  Act).
 Reference should be made to the pre-
 amble of the proposed rulemaking for a
 description of the purposes and intended
 use of the regulation.
   Written comments on  the proposed
 rulemaking  were invited  and  received
 from  interested  parties. The Environ-
 mental  Protection  Agency  has  care-
 fully considered  all comments received.
 All written comments are on file with the
 Agency.
   The regulation has been reorganized
 and   rewritten   to   improve  clarity.
 Major changes that -were made as a re-
 sult  of  comments  received  are  sum-
 marized below:
   (a)  The  terms "1-week"   and  "1-
 month"  as used  in  § 133.102 (a) and
 (b)  of  the  proposed rulemaking  have
 been changed to  7 consecutive days and
 30 consecutive  days  respectively  (See
 }  133.102 (a), (b),and (c)).
   (b)  Some comments indicated that the
 proposed rulemaking appeared  to re-
 quire 85 percent removal of biochemical
 oxygen  demand  and suspended  solids
 only  in  cases when  a treatment works
 would treat a substantial portion of ex-
 tremely  high strength industrial  waste
 (See  § 133.102(g)  of the proposed rule-
 making) . The Intent was that  in no case
 should  the percentage removal of bio-
 chemical oxygen demand and suspended
 solids in a 30 day period be less than 85
 percent.  This has been clarified in the
 regulation. In addition, it  has  been ex-
 pressed as percent remaining rather than
 percent  removal   calculated  using the
 arithmetic means of  the values for in-
 fluent and effluent samples collected in
 a  30  day period  (See §  133.102(a) and
 (b)).
   (c) Comments  were made as to the
 difficulty of achieving 85 percent removal
 of biochemical oxygen demand and sus-
 pended solids during wet  weather for
 treatment  works   receiving flows  from
 combined sewer  systems.  Recognizing
 this,  a  paragraph was added  which
 will allow waiver  or adjustment of that
 requirement  on  a case-by-case  basis
 (See §133.103(a)).
   (d) The definition of a 24-hour com-
 posite  sample (See § 133.102(c) of the
proposed rulemaking)  was  deleted from
 the regulation. The sampling require-
 ments  for publicly  owned  treatment
works will be established in guidelines
 issued pursuant to sections 304(g) and
402 of the Act.
  (e)  In ? 133.103 of the proposed rule-
making, It was recognized that secondary
 treatment processes are subject to upsets
 over which little  or no  control may be
 exercised. This provision has been de-
 leted. It is no longer considered necessary
 in this regulation since procedures for
 notice and review of upset incidents will
 be included in discharge permits Issued
 pursuant to section 402 of the Act.
   (f) Paragraph  (f) of  § 133.102 of the
 proposed rulemaking, which relates to
 treatment works which receive substan-
 tial portions of high strength industrial
 wastes, has been rewritten for clarity. In
 addition, a  provision has  been added
 which limits the use of the upwards ad-
 justment provision to only those cases in
 which the flow or loading from an indus-
 try  category exceeds  10 percent of the
 design flow or loading of the treatment
 works. This intended to reduce or elimi-
 nate the administrative  burden which
 would be involved In  making Insignlfl-
, cant adjustments In the  biochemical
 oxygen  demand  and  suspended solids
 criteria (See §133.103(b)).
   The  major  comments   for  which
 changes were  not made are discussed
 below:
   (a) Comments  were received which
 recommended  that the  regulation  be
 written to allow effluent limitations to be
 based on the treatment necessary to meet
 water quality  standards. No change has
 been made in the regulations because the
 Act  and  its legislative  history  clearly
 show that the  regulation is to be based
 on the  capabilities of secondary treat-
 ment technology and not ambient water
 quality effects.
   (b) A number of comments were re-
 ceived which pointed out that waste sta-
 bilization ponds alone  are not generally
 capable of achieving the proposed efflu-
 ent quality in terms of suspended solids
 and fecal coliform bacteria. A few com-
 menters expressed the opposite view. The
 Agency is of the opinion that with proper
 design (including solids separation proc-
esses and disinfection in some cases) and
operation,  the  level of effluent quality
 specified  can  be  achieved  with waste
stabilization ponds. A  technical bulletin
will be published in the  near future which
will provide guidance on  the design and
operation of waste stabilization ponds.
   (c) Disinfection must be employed in
order to achieve the fecal coliform bac-
teria levels specified. A few commenters
argued that disinfectant is not a second-
ary treatment process and therefore the
fecal  coliform  bacteria  requirements
should be deleted. No changes were made
because disinfection is considered by the
Agency to be  an important element of
secondary treatment which is necessary
for protection of  public  health  (See
 §133.102(0).
  Effective date. These regulations shall
become effective on August 17,1973.
                    JOHN Qtr ARIES,
                Acting Administrator

  AUGUST 14,1973.
                                    Chapter I of  title 40 of the Code of
                                 Federal Regulations Is amended by add-
                                 ing a new Part 133 as follows:
                                 Sec.
                                 133.100  Purpose.
                                 133.101  Authority.
                                 133.102  Secondary treatment.
                                 133.103  Special considerations.
                                 133.104  Sampling and test procedures.
                                    AOTHORITY: Bees.  304()(1), 301(b) (1) (B),
                                 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amend-
                                 ments, 1072, Pi. 02-600.
                                  § 133.100  Purpose.
                                    This part provides information on the
                                 level  of  effluent  quality   attainable
                                 through  the  application of  secondary
                                 treatment.
                                  § 133.101  Authority.
                                    The  information contained  in this
                                 Part  Is  provided  pursuant to sections
                                 304(d) (1) and 301(b) (1) (B) of the Fed-
                                 eral  Water   Pollution  Control   Act
                                 Amendments  of 1972, PL 92-500 (the
                                 Act).
                                 § 133.102  Secondary  treatment.
                                    The following paragraphs describe the
                                 minimum level of effluent quality attain-
                                 able by secondary  treatment in terms of
                                 the parameters  biochemical oxygen  de-
                                 mand, suspended  solids, fecal coliform
                                 bacteria and  pH.  All  requirements  for
                                 each parameter shall be achieved except
                                 as provided for in § 133.103.
                                    (a) Biochemical oxygen demand  (five-
                                 day). (1)  The arithmetic mean of  the
                                 values for effluent samples collected in a
                                 period of 30 consecutive days shall not
                                 exceed 30 milligrams per liter.
                                    (2) The arithmetic  mean of the val-
                                 ues for effluent samples collected in a
                                 period of seven consecutive  days  shall
                                 •not exceed 45 milligrams per liter.
                                    (3) The arithmetic  mean of'the val-
                                 ues for effluent  samples collected in a
                                 period of 30 consecutive days shall not
                                 exceed 15 percent of the arithmetic mean
                                 of the values for  influent samples col-
                                 lected at  approximately the same times
                                 during the same period (85 percent re-
                                 moval).
                                    (b)  Suspended solids. (1)  The arith-
                                 metic mean  of  the values for effluent
                                 samples collected in a  period of 30 con-
                                 secutive days shall  not exceed 30 milli-
                                 grams per liter.
                                    (2)  The arithmetic mean of the val-
                                 ues for effluent  samples collected  in a
                                 period  of seven consecutive days  shall
                                 not exceed 45  milligrams per liter.
                                    (3)  The arithmetic mean of the val-
                                 ues for  effluent samples collected  in  a
                                 period of  30 consecutive days shall not
                                 exceed 15 percent of the arithmetic mean
                                 of the values for influent  samples col-
                                 lected at approximately the same times
                                 during the same period (85 percent re-
                                 moval).
                                   (c) Fecal coliform bacteria.  (1)  The
                                 geometric mean of the value for effluent
                                 samples collected In a period of 30 con-
                                 secutive days shall  not  exceed  200  per
                                 100 mllllllters.
                               FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36,  NO.  159-FHIDAY, AUGUST 17,

-------
  (2) The geometric mean of the values
for effluent samples collected In a period
of seven consecutive days shall not ex-
ceed 400 per 100 milliliters.
  (d) pH. The effluent values for pH shall
remain within the limits of 6.0 to 9.0.
§ 133.103  Special considerations.
  (ft)  Combined   sewers.   Secondary
treatment may not be capable of meet-
ing the percentage removal requirements
of paragraphs  (a) (3)   and  (b)(3)  of
§ 133.102 during wet weather in treat-
ment works  which receive  flows  from
combined sewers (sewers which are de-
signed to transport  both storm water
and-sanitary sewage).  For such treat-
ment works, the decision must be made
on a case-by-case basis as  to whether
any  attainable percentage removal  level
can be defined, and if so, what that level
should be.
     RULES AND REGULATIONS

  (b) Industrial wastes. For certain in-
dustrial categories, the discharge to nav-
igable waters of biochemical oxygen de-
mand  and suspended solids permitted
under sections 301(b) (1) (A) (i) or 306 of
the Act may be less stringent than the
values  given in paragraphs (a)(l). and
(b) (1)  of § 133.102. In cases when wastes
would be introduced from such an indus-
trial category into  a publicly  owned
treatment works, the values for biochemi-
cal oxygen demand and suspended solids
in  paragraphs (a)(l)  and  (b)(l)  of
§ 133.102 may  be adjusted upwards pro-
vided that: (1) the permitted discharge
of such  pollutants, attributable to the
industrial category, would not be greater
than that  which  would  be  permitted
under  sections 301(b) (1) (a) (i)  or 306
of the Act if such industrial category
were to discharge directly into the navi-
gable waters, and  (2) the flow or loading
                                22299

of such pollutants introduced by the in-
dustrial category exceeds  10  percent of
the design flow or loading of the publicly
owned treatment works. When such an
adjustment is made, the values for bio-
chemical oxygen demand  or  suspended
solids in paragraphs (a) (2) and (b) (2)
of § 133.102 should  be adjusted propor-
tionally.
§ 133.104 Sampling and test procedures.
  (a) Sampling  and test procedures for
pollutants listed in  § 133.102 shall be in
accordance with guidelines promulgated
by the Administrator pursuant  to sec-
tions 304(g)  and 402 of the Act.
  (b) Chemical oxygen demand  (COD)
or total organic  carbon (TOO may be
substituted for biochemical oxygen -de-
mand (BOD)  when a long-term BOD:
COD or BOD:TOC con-elation has been
demonstrated.
  [FF Doc.73-17194 Piled 8-16-73:8:45 am]
                              KDERAl  REGISTER, VOl. 38,  NO.  159—FRIDAY, AUGUST  17, 1973

                                                       2-3

-------
                APPENDIX 3
TEST PROCEDURES FOR ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS

  Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures
  for Analysis of Pollutants (December 1, 1976)

-------
 WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 1976
PART II:
ENVIRONMENTAL
   PROTECTION
     AGENCY
  WATER PROGRAMS

Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures
   for the Analysis of Pollutants

       Amendments

-------
52780
      RULES  AND  REGULATIONS
   Title 4O—Protection of Environment
     CHAPTER I—ENVIRONMENTAL
         PROTECTION AGENCY
    SUBCHAPTER D—WATER PROGRAMS
              [FRL 630-4]

PART 136—GUIDELINES ESTABLISHING
  TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS
  OF POLLUTANTS
       Amendment of Regulations
  On June 9,1975, proposed amendments
to the Guidelines Establishing Test Pro-
cedures for the  Analysis  of Pollutants
(40 CFR 136) were published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER  (40 FB 24535) as required
by section 304 (g) of the Federal Water
Pollution Control  Act Amendments of
1972 (86  Stat. 816, et seq., Pub. L. 92-500,
1972) hereinafter referred to as the Act.
  Section 304 (g)  of the Act requires that
the  Administrator  shall   promulgate
guidelines establishing  test procedures
for  the analysis of pollutants that shall
include factors which must be provided
in:  (1) any certification pursuant to sec-
tion 401 of the Act, or (2) any permit ap-
plication pursuant to section 402 of the
Act. Such test procedures are to be used
by permit applicants to demonstrate that
effluent discharges meet applicable pol-
lutant  discharge limitations and by the
States  and other enforcement activities
in routine or random  monitoring of ef-
fluents to verify compliance with pollu-
tion control measures.
  Interested persons were  requested to
submit written comments, suggestions, or
objections to the proposed  amendments
by September  7,  1975. One  hundred and
thirty-five letters were received from
commenters. The following categories of
organizations  were represented by the
commenters: Federal agencies accounted
for twenty-four  responses; State agen-
cies accounted for twenty-six responses;
local agencies accounted for seventeen
responses;  regulated major dischargers
accounted  for forty-seven  responses;
trade and professional organizations ac-
counted  for eight  responses; analytical
instrument  manufacturers  and vendors
accounted for seven responses; and an-
alytical  service  laboratories  accounted
for six responses.
  All comments were carefully evaluated
by a technical review committee. Based
upon the review of comments, the follow-
ing principal  changes  to  the proposed
amendments were made:
  (A)  Definitions. Section 136.2 has been
amended to update references: Twenty
commenters,  representing  the entire
spectrum of responding groups pointed
out that the references  cited in §§ 136.2
(f), 136.2(g), and 136.200  were out-of-
date; §§  136.2(f), 136.2(g),and 136.2(h),
respectively, have been amended to show
the following  editions  of  the standard
references:  "14th  Edition  of Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water
and Waste Water;" "1974  EPA Manual
of Methods for the Analysis of Water and
Waste;"  and "Part 31,1975 Annual Book
of ASTM Standards."
  (B)  Identification of Test Procedures.
Both the content and format of f 136.3,
"Table I, List of Approved Test Proce-
dures" have been revised in response to
twenty-one  comments  received  from
State and local governments, major regu-
lated dischargers, professional and trade
associations, and analytical laboratories.
  Table I has been revised by:
  (1) The addition of a fourth column
of references which includes procedures
of the United States  Geological Survey
which  are equivalent to previously ap-
proved methods.
  (2) The addition of a fifth column of
miscellaneous  references to procedures
which  are equivalent to previously ap-
proved methods.
  (3) Listing generically related param-
eters alphabetically within four subcate-
gories: bacteria, metals, radiological and
residue, and by listing these subcategory
hea'dings in  alphabetic  sequence  rel-
ative to the remaining parameters.
  (4) Deleting the parameter "Algicides"
and by entering the single relevant algi-
cide, "Pentachlorophenol" by its chemi-
cal name.
  (C)  Clarification of Test Parameters.
The conditions  for analysis  of several
parameters have been more specifically
defined as a result of comments received
by the Agency:
  (1) In response to five commenters
representing State or local governments,
major dischargers, or analytical instru-
ment manufacturers,  the end-point for
the alkalinity  determination is specifi-
cally designated as pH 4.5.
  (2) Manual digestion and distillation
are still  required as necessary prelimi-
nary steps for the Kjeldahl nitrogen pro-
cedure. Analysis after such distillation
may be  by Nessler  color comparison,
titration, electrode, or automated pheno-
late  procedures.
  (3) In response to eight commenters
representative of Federal and State gov-
ernments, major dischargers,  and ana-
lytical instrument manufacturers, man-
ual distillation at pH 9.5 is now specified
for ammonia measurement.
  (D)  New Parameters and Analytical
Procedures. Forty-four new parameters
have been added to Table I. In addition
to the designation of analytical proce-
dures for these new parameters, the fol-
lowing modifications have been made in
analytical procedures designated in re-
sponse to comments.
  (1) The ortho-tolidine procedure was
not  approved  for the measurement of
residual chlorine because of its poor ac-
curacy and precision. Its approval had
been requested by seven commenters rep-
resenting major dischargers,  State, or
local governments, and analytical instru-
ment manufacturers. Instead, the N,N-
diethyl-p-phenylenediamine      (DPD)
method is approved as  an interim pro-
cedure pending more intensive laboratory
testing. It has  many of the advantages
of the ortho-tolidine procedure such as
low cost, ease of operation, and also Is of
acceptable precision and accuracy.
  (2) The   Environmental  Protection
Agency concurred with the American Rpe
Manufacturers'  request to approve «s
procedure for measurement of color, and
copies of the procedure are now'availaWe
at the Environmental Monitoring  ana
Support Laboratory, Cincinnati (EMSL-
CI),
  (3) In response to three requests from
Federal, State governments,  and  dis-
chargers,  "hardness," may be measured
as the sum of calcium and magnesium
analyzed by atomic absorption and ex-
pressed as their carbonates.
  (4) The proposal to limit measure-
ment of fecal coliform bacteria in the
presence of chlorine to only the "Most
Probable Number" (MPN) procedure has
been withdrawn in response to requests
from forty-five  commenters  including
State pollution control agencies, permit
holders, analysts, treatment plant op-
erators, and a manufacturer of analyt-
ical supplies. The membrane filter (MF)
procedure will continue to be  an ap-
proved technique for the routine meas-
urement of fecal  coliflorm in the  pre-
sence of  chlorine. However, the  MPN
procedure must be used to resolve con-
troversial  situations.   The   technique
selected by the analyst must be reported
with the data.
  (5) A total  of fifteen objections, re-
presenting the entire spectrum of com-
menters, addressed the drying tempera-
tures used for measurement of residues.
The use of different temperatures in dry-
ing of total residue, dissolved residue and
suspended residue was cited as not allow-
ing  direct  Intel-comparability  between
these measurements. Because the intent
of designating the three separate residue
parameters is to measure separate waste
characteristics (low drying temperatures
to measure volatile substances, high dry-
ing temperatures to measure anhydrous
inorganic substances), the difference in
drying  temperatures for these  residue
parameters must be preserved.
   (E) Deletion of Measurement Tech-
niques. Some  measurement techniques
that had been proposed have been de-
leted In  response  to  objections  raised
during the public comment period.
   (1)  The  proposed  infrared  spec-
trophotometric  analysis   for  oil  and
grease has been withdrawn. Eleven com-
menters representing  Federal or State
agencies and major dischargers claimed
that this parameter  is defined by the
measurement procedure. Any alteration
in the procedure would change the def-
inition  of the  parameter. The Environ-
mental Protection Agency agreed.
   (2) The proposed separate parameter
for  sulfide at concentrations  below  1
mg/1, has been  withdrawn. Methylene
blue spectrophotometry is  now included
in Table I as an approved procedure for
sulfide  analysis. The titrimetric  iodine
procedure for sulflde analysis  may only
be used for analysis of sulfide at concen-
trations in excess of one milligram per
liter.
   (F) Sample Preservation and Holding
Times. Criteria for sample preservation
and sample holding times were requested
by several commenters. The reference for
sample  preservation and  holding time
criteria applicable to the Table I param-
eters is given In footnote (1) of Table I.
  (G) Alternate Test Procedures. Com-
ments pertaining to § 136.4, Application
for Alternate Test Procedures, included
objections: to  various obstacles  within
                            FEDERAL  REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. »3J_WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER I, 1976
                                                  3-2

-------
                                            RULES AND RfGULATIONS
                                                                       52781
these  procedures for  expeditious ap-
proval of alternate test procedures. Four
analytical   instrument  manufacturers
commented that by limiting of applica-
tion for review and/or approval of alter-
nate test procedures  to NPDES  permit
holders, 1136.4 became an impediment to
the  commercial development of new  or
improved measurement devices based on
new measurement principles.  Applica-
tions for such review and/or approval
will  now be accepted  from any person.
The intent of the alternate  test pro-
cedure Is to allow the ^ise of measure-
ment systems which  are  known to  be
equivalent to  the approved test  proce-
dures In waste water discharges.
   Applications for approval of alternate
test  procedures applicable to specific dis-
charges will continue to be  made only by
NPDES permit holders, and approval of
such applications will be  made on a
case-by-case basis by  the Regional Ad-
ministrator in whose Region  the dis-
charge is made.
   Applications for approval of alternate
test  procedures  which are intended for
nationwide use can now be submitted by
any  person directly to the Director of the
Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory in Cincinnati. Such applica-
tions should include a complete methods
write-up, any literature references, com-
parability data between the proposed al-
ternate test procedure and  those already
approved by the Administrator. The ap-
plication should include precision and
accuracy data of the proposed alternate
test  procedure and data confirming the
general applicability of  the test proce-
dure to the industrial categories of waste
water for which it is intended. The Di-
rector of the Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory, after review of
submitted  Information, will recommend
approval or rejection of the application
to the Administrator,  or he will return
the application to the applicant for more
information. Approval or rejection of ap-
plications  for test procedures intended
for nationwide use will be made  by the
Administrator, after considering the rec-
ommendation  made  by the Director  of
the Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory,  Cincinnati. Since the
Agency considers these procedures for
approval of alternate test procedures for
nationwide use to be interim procedures,
we will welcome suggestions for criteria
for approval of alternate test procedures
for nationwide  use.  Interested persons
should submit their written comments In
triplicate on or  before June 1, 1977 to:
Dr. Robert B. Medz, Environmental Pro-
tection Technologist, Monitoring Quality
Assurance   Standardization, Office  of
Monitoring and Technical Support (RD-
680), Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C. 20460:
   (H) freedom  of Information. A copy
of all public comments, an analysis by
parameter of those comments, and docu-
ments providing further information on
the rationale for the changes made in
the  final regulation  are available for
inspection and copying at the Environ-
mental Protection Agency Public  Infor-
mation  Reference Unit,  Room  2922,
Waterside  Mall,  401  M Street,  SW.,
Washington, D.C. 20460, during normal
business hours.  The  EPA Information
regulation 40 CFR 2 provides that a rea-
sonable fee may be charged for copying
such documents.
  Effective date: These amendments be-
come effective  on April 1,1977.
  Dated: November 19,1976.
                  JOHN. QUAHLES,
              Acting Administrator,
    Environmental Protection Agency-
  Chapter  I, Subchapter D, of  Title  40,
Code of. Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
  1. In § 136.2, paragraphs (f),  (g), and
(h) are amended to read as follows:

§ 136.2  Definitions.
   (f) "Standard Methods" means Stand-
ard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Waste Water, 14th Edition,
1976. This publication is available from
the American Public Health Association,
1015 18th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20036.
   (g)  "ASTM" means Annual Book of
Standards, Part  31, Water,  1975. This
publication is available from the Ameri-
can Society for Testing and Materials,
1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pennsyl-
vania 19103.
   (h)  "EPA  Methods"  means Methods
for  Chemical Analysis of Water  and
Waste, 1974.  Methods Development and
Quality Assurance Research Laboratory,
                                      National Environmental Research Cen-
                                      ter, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268; U.S. Envi-
                                      ronmental Protection Agency, Office of
                                      Technology  Transfer, Industrial Envi-
                                      ronmental Research Laboratory, Cincin-
                                      nati, Ohio  45268. This  publication is
                                      available from the Office of Technology
                                      Transfer.
                                        2. In  § 136.3, the second sentence of
                                      paragraph (b) is amended, and a new
                                      paragraph (c) is added to read as fol-
                                      lows:

                                      § 136.3   Identification of test procedures.
                                          *****
                                        (b)  *  * * Under such circumstances,
                                      additional test procedures for  analysis
                                      of  pollutants may be specified  by  the
                                      Regional Administrator  or the Director
                                      upon the recommendation of the Direc-
                                      tor of the Environmental Monitoring and
                                      •Support Laboratory, Cincinnati.
                                        (c) Under certain circumstances, the
                                      Administrator may approve,  upon rec-
                                      ommendation by the Director, Environ-
                                      mental Monitoring and Support Labora-
                                      tory, Cincinnati, additional alternate test
                                      procedures for nationwide use.
                                        3. Table I of § 136.3 is revised by listing
                                      the parameters alphabetically; by adding
                                      44 new parameters; by adding a fourth
                                      column under references listing equiva-
                                      lent  United  States  Geological  Survey
                                      methods; by adding a fifth column under
                                      references listing miscellaneous equiva-
                                      lent methods; by deleting footnotes 1
                                      through 7 and adding 24 new footnotes,
                                      to read as follows:
                  TABLE I.—IA*t of approved test procedures1
     Parameter and unite
                                                          References
                                            1974   14th ed.    (pagenos.)    Other
                              Method         EPA  standard  •           approved
                                          methods methods Ft. 81  US OS  methods
                                                         1970 methods*
                                                       ASTM
                    mffli-
1. Acidity,  as C»CO»,
   grams per Uter.
2. Alkalinity, as CaCO», mffli-
   grams per liter.
                        Electrometric  end  point
                             of 8.2) or phenol-
                                end point.
                                ic    tititttlon
                          (only to pH 4.0) manual
                          or automated, or equiva-
                          lent automated methods.

 3. Ammonia (as N), milligrams Manual distillation < (at pH
     per liter.                9.5) followed by nessleri-
                          Htaon,  tttraHon,  elec-
                          trode,  Automated  phe-
                          nolate.
       BACTERIA
                                               1  273(4d)    116


                                               3    278    111
•40


 41
'(607)


•W7)

159
108 ...
410 ..
412

237

no

•(614)
                                                    616
4. Coliform (fecal)', number per MPN; • membrane filter 	
100ml.
i. Conform (fecal) • m presence 	 do.". 	
of chlorine, number per 100 	 9:
ml.
6. Coliform (total), 'number per 	 do.' 	 	
100ml. 	 	
7. CoUform (total) • In presence MPN;' membrane filter 	
of chlorine, number per 100 with enrichment. 	
ml.
8. Fecal streptococci,1' number MPN;' membrane filter; 	
per 100 ml. plate count. 	
9. Benzidine, milligrams per liter. Oxidation— colorimetlio ' 	 '.""'.
10. Biochemical oxygen demand, Winkler (Aside modifica-
5-d (BODj), milligrams per tion) or electrode method. .
liter.
11. Bromide, milligrams per liter.. Titrimetric, iodine-lodate ; 14
12. Chemical oxygen demand Diohromate reflux 	 	 20

-------
52782
RULES AND  REGULATIONS
1974 1
Parameter and unite Method EPA ri
methods n

pounds (except pesticides),
milligrams per liter.
15. Chlorine — total residual milli- lodometric titration, amper-
grams per liter. ometric or starch-iodine
end-point; DPD colori-
metric "or Titrimetrie _.
methods (these last 2 are
interim methods pending
laboratory testing).
16. Color, platinum cobalt units Colorimetric; spectrophoto-
or dominant wave length, metric; or ADMI pro-
hue, luminance, purity. cedure."
17. Cyanide, total,11 milligrams Distillation followed by
per liter. silver nitrate titration or
pyridine pyrazolone (or
barbituric acid) colori-
metric.
18. Cyanide amenable to chloriu- .do.. . . ....
ation, milligrams per liter.
19. Dissolved oxygen, milligrams Winkler (Azide modiGca-
per liter. tion) or electrode method.
20. Fluoride, milligrams per liter Distillation * followed bv
ion electrode; SPADNS;
or automated complexone,
21. Hardness— Total, as CaCOj, EDTA titration; auto-
milligrams per liter. mated colorimetric; or
atomic absorption (sum .
of Ca and Mg as their
respective carbonates).
22. Hydrogen ion (pH), pH units. Electrometric measurement.
23. Kjeldahl nitrogen (is N), Digestion and distillation
milligrams per liter. followed by nesslerizatiou,
titration, or electrode;
automated digestion auto-
mated phenolate.
METAU
24. Aluminum— Total, milligrams Digestion » followed by
per liter. atomic absorption '• or by ..
colorimetric (Eriochrome
Cyanine R).
25. Aluminum — Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration l7 fol- _
grams per liter. lowed by referenced meth-
ods for total aluminum.
26. Antimony — Total, milligrams Digestion" followed by
per liter. atomic absorption."
27. Antimony— Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration " fol- ..
grams per liter. lowed by referenced
method for total antimony.
28. Arsenic — Total, milligrams Digestion followed by silver
per liter. diethyldithiocarbamate:
or atomic absorption." "
29. Arsenic— Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration » fol- .
grams per liter. lowed by referenced
method for total arsenic.
10. Barium— Total, milligrams Digestion » followed by
per liter. atomic absorption."
31. Barium— Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration » fol-
grams per liter. lowed by referenced
method for total barium.
32. Beryllium— Total, milligrams Digestion " followed by
per liter. atomic absorption « or by
coloriraetric (Aluminon).
33. Beryllium— Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration » fol- _.
grams per liter. lowed by referenced
method for total beryllium.
34. Boron— Total, milligrams per Colorimetric (Curcumin) —
liter.
35. Boron — Dissolved, milligrams 0.45 micron filtration " fol- .
per liter. lowed by referenced meth-
od for total boron.
36. Cadmium— Total, milligrams Digestion « followed by
per liter. atomic absorption '« or by ..
colorimetric (Dithizone).
37. Cadmium — Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration " fol-
grams per liter. lowed by referenced meth-
od for total cadmium.
38. Calcium— Total, milligrams Digestion » followed by
per liter. atomic absorption; or _
EDTA titration.
39. Calcium— Dissolved, milli- 0.45 micron filtration " fol- _
grams per liter. lowed by referenced meth-
od for total calcium.
40. Chromium VI, milligrams per Extraction and atomic all-
liter, sorption; colorimetric (Di-
phenylcarbazide) .
41. Chromium VI — Dissolved 0.45 micron filtration 17 fol-
miUigrams per liter. lowed by referenced meth-
od for chromium VI.
42. Chromium— Total, milligrams Digestion » followed by
colorimetric (Diphenyl-
carbazide) .
grams per liter. ' lowed by referenced meth-
od for total chromium.


35
36
39
40
49
51
56
65
59
61
68
70 — .

239
175
165
182 __.
M

^


95
97
99

13
101

101

89 105


105


References
4th «d. (page noa.)
Other
lethods Ft. 31 ITS OS "methods
1975 methods*
A8TM

318
322 278
332
329 	
64 	
66

361 503
376 505
443 368
450
389
391 307
393 305
614 -
202 161

460 178
437


152 	 _
171 .. .. .



J8S

IK
152 	

152 	
177 .

287 	

148 345
182 	

148 145
189


192

148 345
192 28*






82

85
126

93

94

129
122

11 (19)




" (SI)
"(3T)
52
53



62

66

76
75

78
77









.0(22)
'(609)




»(617)

'(600)
K612)








i







* (619) » (IT)







•(«•)


                    See footnotes at end of table.
                           FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO. 732—WEDNESDAY, DECEfWE* 1...W*
                                                 3-4

-------
                                RULES  AND  REGULATIONS
                                                                                                    52783
      Parameter and units
                                         Method
                                                           References
                                        1974   14th ed.     (pagenos.)      Other
                                        EPA   standard—'———	 approved
                                      methods methods  Pt. 31   USO8  methods
                                                         1976  methods'
                                                        ASTM
44. Cobalt—Total, milligrams per
     liter.'
46. Cobalt-Dissolved,    milli-
     grams per liter.
48. Copper—Total,
     per liter.
milligrams
47. Copper—Dissolved, milli-
     grams per liter.

48. Gold—Total,  milligrams per
     liter.
49. Iridlum—Total, milligrams
     per liter.
60. Iron—Total, milligrams per
     liter.
81. Iron—Dissolved,
     per liter.
milligrams
62. Lead—Total,  milligrams per
     liter.

63. Lead—Dissolved,  milligrams
     per liter.

54. Magnesium—Total,    milli-
     grams per liter.

55. Magnesium—Dissolved milli-
     grams per liter.
56. Manganese—Total milligrams
     per liter.
57. Manganese—Dissolved milli-
     grams per liter.
58.  Mercury—Total,   milligrams
     per liter.
69.  Mercury—Dissolved,   milli-
     grams per liter.

60.  Molybdenum—Total,  milli-
     grams per liter.
61.  Molybdenum—Dissolved,
     milligrams per liter.
82. Nickel—Total,   .
     per liter.

63. Nickel-Dissolved,
     grams per liter.

64. Osmium—Total,
     per liter.
65. Palladium—Total,
     per liter.
66. Platinum—Total,
     per liter.
67. Potassium—Total,
     per liter.
milligrams


     milli-


milligrams

milligrams

milligrams

milligrams
68. Potassium—Dissolved, milli-
     grams per liter.

69. Rhodium—Total, milligrams
     per liter.
70. Ruthenium—Total,    milli-
     grams per liter.
71. Selenium—Total, milligrams
     per liter.
72. Selenium—Dissolved,  milli-
   grams per liter.

78. Silica—Dissolved, milligrams
     per liter.
74. Silver—Total,"
     per liter.
75. Silver-Dissolved,"
     grains per liter.
milligrams


     mllli-
76. Sodium—Total,
     per liter.
77. Sodium—Dissolved,
     grams per liter.
milligrams


     milU-
                                  by
                                                               107
                                                                        148
                                                               108
                                                   148
                                                   196
                                          110
                                                   148

                                                   208
                                                               112
                                                   148

                                                   215
                                          114
                                                   148
                                                   221
                                                               116
                                                                        148
                                                               118
Digestion"  followed
  atomic absorption."
0.45 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total cobalt.
Digestion " followed by
  atomic absorption " or by
  colorimetric  (Neocu-
  prolne).
0.45 micron filtration » fol-
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total copper.
Digestion <> followed by
  atomic absorption."
Digestion » followed by
  atomic absorption."
Digestion" followed by
  atomic absorption " or by
  colorimetric (Phenanthro-
  line).
0.45 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total iron.
Digestion " followed by
  atomic absorption " or by
  colorimetric (Dithizone).
0.45 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total lead.
Digestion « followed by
  atomic absorption;  or
  gravimetric.
0.45 micron filtration " dol-
  lowed    by   referenced
  method for total magne-
  sium.
Digestion"   followed  by
  atomic absorption'»or by 	  225,227
  colorimetric (Persulfate or
  perlodate).
0.45 micron filtration" fol-	_		
  lowed    by   referenced
  method for total  manga-
  nese.
Flameless  atomic absorp-
  tion.
0.46 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed   by   referenced
  method for total mercury.
Digestion"  followed   by
  atomic absorption."
0.46 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed   by   referenced
  method for total molybde-
  num.
Digestion"  followed  by
  atomic absorption » or by
  colorimetric (Heptoxime).
0.45 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed  .by   referenced
  method for total nickel.
Digestion»  followed   by
  atomic absorption."
Digestion"  followed
  atomic absorption."
Digestion»  followed
  atomic absorption."
Digestion»  followed  by
  atomic absorption,  colori-	
  metric (Cobaltinitrite), or	
  by flame photometric.
0.45 micron filtration" tol-	
  lowed by referenced meth-
  of for total potassium.
Digestion"  followed  by	
  atomic absorption."
Digestion"  followed  by	
  atomic absorption."
Digestion»  followed  by
  atomic absorption." "   .
0.45 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total selenium.
0.45 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed   by,  colorimetric
  (Mplybdosillcato)..
Digestion"   followed  by
  atomic absorption » or by
  colorimetric (Dlthlnme).
0.46 micron filtration " fol-
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total sliver.
Digestion u  followed  by
  atomic absorption  or by	
  flame photometric.
0.46 micron  filtration" tol-	
  lowed by referenced meth-
  od for total sodium,
                                                                               345
                                                                                                 » (87)
                        345
                        293
                                                                                         83 > (61«) » (37)
                                                          345
                                                                   102
                                                                            • (619)
                                                                              345
                                                                                       106
                                                                            > (619)
                                                          345
                                                                   109
                                                                            >(619)
                                                                               345
                                                                            I (619)
                                                                        166     338
                                                                  " (51).
                                                          350.
                                                               141
                                                                       148    345
                                                                                       113
by

by
         148 .
                                                   335
                                                   214
                                                                   184
                                                                               408  .
                                           145
                                                   169
                                          274
                                                               146
                                                   487    898
                                                                   189
                 148 .
                 248 .
142 >(«!») K(S7)
                                                               147
                                                                        2W    40> ,
                                 141
  See footnotes at end of table.
           KMftM; REOISTH,  VOt.  41, NO.  »3J—WEONISDAY, MCIMMK I,  If7«



                                      3-5

-------
52784
RULES AND  REGULATIONS
Parameter and unit*
78. Thallium— Total, milligrams
per liter.
79. Thallium— Dissolved, milli-
grams per liter.
80. Tin— Total, milligrams per
liter.
81. Tin — Dissolved, milligrams
per liter.
82. Titanium— Total, milligrams
per liter.
83. Titanium— Dissolved, milli-
grams per liter.
84. Vanadium— Total, milligrams
per liter.
85. Vanadium — Dissolved, milli-
grams per liter.
86. Zinc— Total, milligrams per
liter.
87. Zinc— Dissolved, milligrams
per liter.
88. Nitrate (as N), milligrams per
liter.
89. Nitrate (as N\ milligrams uor
liter.
90. Oil and grease, milligrams por
liter.
91. Organic carbon; total (TOC),
milligrams per liter.
92. Organic nitrogen (as N), milli-
grams per liter.
93. Orthophosphate (as P), milli-
grams per liter.
94. Pentachlorophenol, milli-
grams per liter.
95. Pesticides, milligrams per
liter.
96. Phenols, milligrams per liter..
97. Phosphorus (elemental), milli-
grams per liter.
98. Phosphorus; total (as P),
milligrams per liter.
RADIOLOOICJIL
99. Alpha— Total, pCi per liter...
100. Alpha— Counting error, pCi
per liter.
101. Beta— Total, pCi per liter 	
102. Beta— Counting error, pCi per
liter.
103. (a) Radium— Total, pCi per
liter.
(b) »« Ha, pCi per liter
RESIDUE
104. Total, milligrams per liter
105. Total dissolved (filterable),
milligrams per liter.
106. Total— suspended (nonfllter-
able), milligrams per liter.
107. Settleable, milliliters per liter
or milligrams per liter.
108. Total volatile, milligrams per
liter.
109. Specific conductance, micro-
mhos per centimeter at 25"
110. Sulfate (as 8O<), milligrams
per liter.
111. Sulfide (as S), milligrams per
liter.
112. Sulfite (as SO3), milligrams
per liter.
113. Surfactants, milligrams per
liter.
115. Turbidity, NTU 	
1974 14th ed.
Method EPA standard
methods methods
Digestion » followed by
atomic absorption."
lowed by referenced meth-
od for total thalh'um.
Digestion '» followed by
atomic absorption.11
lowed by referenced meth-
od for total tin.
Digestion » followed by
atomic absorption.1'
lowed by referenced meth-
od for total titanium.
Digestion « followed by
colorimetric (Gallic acid).
lowed by referenced meth-
od for total vanadium.
Digestion 15 followed by
colorimetric (Dithizone).
0.45 micron filtration 17 fol-
lowed by referenced meth-
od for total zinc.
Cadmium reduction; bru-
cine sulfate; automated
cadmium or hydrazine re-
duction.21
Manual or automated colori-
metric (Diazotization).
Liquid-liquid extraction
with trichloro-trifluoro-
ethane-gravimetric.
Combustion — Infrared
method."
KJeldahl nitrogen minus
ammonia nitrogen.
Manual or automated ascor-
bic acid reduction.
do 11
Colorimetric, (4AAP)
Gas chromatography M 	
Persulfate digestion fol-
lowed by manual or auto-
mated ascorbic acid reduc-
tion.
Proportional or scintillation .
counter.
do
Proportional counter—
	 do 	
do
Scintillation counter _ . _
Gravimetric, 103 to 105° C- -
Glass fiber filtration, 180° C-
Glass fiber filtration, 109 to
105° C.
Volumetric or gravimetric 	
Gravimetric, 550° C
Wheatstonc bridge conduc-
timetry.
Gravimetric; turbidimetric; -
or automated colorimetric
(barium cbloranilate).
Titrimetric— Iodine lor lev-
liter; Methylene blue pho-
tometric.
Titrimetric, iodine-iodate...
Colorimetric (Methylene
blue).
Calibrated glass or electro-
metric thermometer.
Nephelometric 	
149

150

151

153

155

201
197
207
215
229
236
175, 159
249
256

241
249
256





270
266
268
272
275
277
279
284
285
157
288
295






152
260
148
265
423
427
620
434
515
532
437
481
624
555
582
476, 481
624
648
048
648
«48
601
667
91
92
94
95
95
71
493
498
505
503
508
too
125
132
References
(page nos.) other
Ft. 31 US OS methods
1975 methods'
A8TM


11 (65) 	




441 'I (67)

345 159 >(619)»(37)


358 119 H614) »(28)
121

467 » (4)
122 > (612, 614)
384 131 > (621)

529 » (24)
545

384 133 > <621)
3911»»l'75+78)
594 '1 (79)
60111 "(75+78)
696 11 (79)
661
11 (81)





120 148 > (606)
424 	 	 H«at)
425 1(623)

154 	

435 	
494 »(11) 	

223 156 	
                        i Recommendations for sampling and preservation of samples aeeording to parameter measured may be.foundI In
                      "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, 1974" U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, taoie t, pp.
                      viii-xii.
                                FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41. NO.  232—WEDNESDAY,  DECEMBER  I,
                                                                3-6

-------
                                                   RULES AND  REGULATIONS
                                                                                  52785
  »All page references for USGS methods, unless otherwise noted, are to Brown, E., Skougstad, M. W., and Fish-
man.MlJ., "Methods for Collection and Analysis of Water Samples for Dissolved Minerals and Gases," U.S. Geologi-
cal Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Inv., book 5, oh. Al, (1970).   ,,...        ...  .    ...   .
  > EPA comparable method may be found on indicated page of "Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of
Official Analytical Chemists" methods manual, 12th ed. (1975).
  i Manual distillation is not required if comparability data on representative effluent samples are on company file
to show that this preliminary distillation step is not necessary; however, manual distillation will be required to resolve
any controversies.
  ' The method used must be specified.
  «The 5 tube MPN is used.
  ' Slack, K. V. and others, "Methods for Collection and Analysis of Aquatic Biological and Miicobiological Samples:
U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Inv. book 5, oh. A4 (1978)."
  i Since the membrane filter technique usually yields low and variable recovery from chlorinated wastewaters, the
MPN method will be required to resolve any controversies.
  ' Adequately tested methods for benzidine are not available. Until approved methods are available, the following
interim method can be used for the estimation of benzidine: (1) "Method for Benzidine and Its Salts in Wastewaters,"
available from Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cin-
cinnati, Ohio 45268.
  u American National Standard on Photographic Processing Effluents, Apr. 2, 1975. Available from ANSI, 1430
Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10018.
  " Fishman, M. J. and Brown, Eugene, "Selected Methods of the U.S. Geological Survey for Analysis of Waste-
waters," (1976) open-file report 76-177.
  u Procedures for pentachlorophenol, chlorinated organic compounds ,and pesticides can be obtained from the En-
vironmental Monitoring and Support Lbaoratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
  '»Color method (ADMI procedure) available from Environmental Monitoring and Support  Lbaoratory, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
  u For samples suspected of having thiocyanaie interference, magnesium chloride is used as the digestion catalyst.
In the approved test procedure for cyanides, the recommended catalysts are replaced with 20 ml of a solution of 510 g/1
magnesium chloride (MgClf6HiO). This substitution will eliminate thiocyanate interference for both total cyanide
and cyanide amendable to cblorination measurements.                                            ~~
  16 For the determination of total metals the sample is not filtered before processing. Because vigorous  digestion
procedures may result in a loss of certain metals through preciptation, a less vigorous treatment is recommended as
given on p. 83 (4.1.4) of "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes" (1974). In those instances where a
more vigorous digestion is desired the procedure'on p. 82 (4.1.3) should be followed. For the measurement of the noble
metal series (gold, indium, osmium, palladium, platimum,  rhodium and ruthenium), an aqua regia digestion is to be
substituted as follows: Transfer a representitive aliquot of  the well-mixed sample to a Griffin beaker and add 3 ml
of concentrated redistilled HNOi. Place the beaker on a steam bath and evaporate to dryness. Cool the beaker and
cautiously add a 5 ml portion of aqua regia. (Aqua regia is prepared immediately before use by carefully adding 3
volumes of concentrated HC1 to one volume of concentrated HNOS.) Cover the beaker with a watch glass and return
to the steam bath. Continue heating the covered beaker for 50 *"'"  Remove cover and evaporate to dryness. Cool
and take up the residue in a small quantity of 1:1 EC1. Wash down the beaker walls and watch glass with distilled*
water and filter the sample to remove silicates and other insoluble material that could clog the atomizer. Adjust the
volm e to some predetermined value based on the expected metal concentration. The sample is now ready for analysis.
  " As the various furnace devices (nameless AA) are essentially atomic absorption techniques, they are considered
to be approved test methods. Methods of standard addition are to be followed as noted in p. 78 of "Methods for Chem-
ical Analysis of Water and Wastes," 1974.
  17 Dissolved metals are defined as those constitutents which will pass though a 0.45 jan membrane filter. A pre-
flltration is permissible to free the sample from larger suspended solids. Filter the sample as  soon as  practical
after collection using the first 50 to 100 ml to rinse the filter flask. (Glass or plastic filtering apparatus are recommended
to avoid possible contamination.) Discard the portion used to rinse the flask and collect the required volume of
filtrate. Acidify the filtrate with 1:1 redistilled HNO, to a pH of 2. Normally, 3 ml of (1:1) acid per liter should be
sufficient to preserve the samples.
  "See "Atomic Absorption Newsletter," vol.  13,75 (1974). Available from Perkin-Elmer Corp., Main Ave. Norwalk,
Conn. 06852.
  u Method available from Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268.
  " Recommended methods for the analysis of silver in industrial wastewaters at  concentrations of 1 mg/1 and
above are inadequate where silver exists as an inorganic halide. Silver halides such as the bromide and chloride
are relatively insoluble in reagents such as nitric acid but  are readily soluble in an aqueous buffer of sodium thio-
sulfate and sodium hydroxide to a pH of 12. Therefore, for levels of silver above 1 mg/1 20 ml of sample should be
diluted to 100 ml by adding 40 ml each of 2M NaiSiOj and 2M NaOH.  Standards should be prepared in the same
manner. For levels of silver below 1 mg/1 the recommended method is satisfactory.
  11 An automated hydrazine reduction method is available from the Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
  a A number of such systems manufactured by various companies are considered to be comparable in their per-
formance. In addition, another technique, based on combustion-methane detection is also acceptable.
  » Goerlitz, D., Brown, E., "Methods for Analysis of Organic Substances in Water": U.S. Geological Survey Tech-
niques of Water-Resources Inv. book 5, ch. A3 (1972):
  » H. F. Addison and R. G. Ackman, "Direct Determination of Elemental Phosphorus by Gas-Liquid Chroma-
tography," "Journal of Chromatography," vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 421-426,1970.
  « The method found on p. 75 measures only the dissolved portion while the method on p. 78 measures  only sus-
pended. Therefore, the 2 results must be added together to obtain "total."
  » Stevens, H. H., Ficke, J. F., and Smoot, G. F., "Water Temperature—Influential Factors, Field Measurement
and Data Presentation: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Inv., book 1 (1975)."
   4. In § 136.4, the  second sentence of
paragraph  (c)  is amended by deleting
the word "subchapter"  immediately fol-
lowing the phrase "procedure under this"
and  immediately  preceding  the  word
"shall"  and  replaced  with the phrase
"paragraph  c;" and § 136.4 is amended
by adding a new paragraph (d) to read
as follows:

§  136.4  Application  for  alternate test
     procedures.
     *****
   (c)  * * * Any application for an alter-
nate test procedure under this paragraph
(c)  shall:  •  *  *
   (d)  An application for approval  of an
alternate test procedure for nationwide
use may be  made by letter  in triplicate
to the Director, Environmental Monitor-
ing and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,
Ohio 45268. Any application for an alter-
nate test procedure under this paragraph
(d) shall:
   (1)  Provide the name and address of
the  responsible  person or firm making
the application.
   (2)  Identify the  pollutant (s)  or pa-
rameter (s)  for  which nationwide ap-
proval of an alternate testing procedure
is being requested.
   (3)  Provide a detailed description of
the  proposed  alternate procedure,  to-
gether with references to published  or
other  studies confirming the general ap-
plicability of the alternate test procedure
to the pollutant (s)  or parameter (s)  in
waste water discharges from representa-
tive and  specified  industrial  or  other
categories.
   (4)  Provide comparability data for the
performance  of  the proposed  alternate
test procedure compared to the perform-
ance of the approved test procedures.
§ 136.5   [Amended]
  5. In § 136.5, paragraph (a) is amended,
by inserting the phrase "proposed by the
responsible person or firm making the
discharge" immediately after the words
"test procedure"  and before  the period
that ends the paragraph.
  6. In § 136.5, paragraph (b) is amended
by  inserting  in the first  sentence the
phrase "proposed by the responsible per-
son or firm making the discharge" im-
mediately after the words "such applica-
tion" and immediately before the comma.
The second sentence  of paragraph (b)
is  amended  by   deleting  the   phrase
"Methods Development and Quality As-
surance Research Laboratory" immedi-
ately  after  the  phrase "State  Permit
Program and to the Director of  the"  at
the end of the sentence, and inserting in
its  place  the  phrase  "Environmental
Monitoring  and  Support  Laboratory,
Cincinnati."
  7. In § 136.5, paragraph (c) is amended
by inserting the phrase "proposed by the
responsible person or  firm making the
discharge" immediately after t'he phrase
"application for an alternate test  pro-
cedure"  and  immediately  before the
comma;  and by  deleting the  phrase
"Methods Development and Quality As-
surance Laboratory"  immediately after
the phrase "application to  the Director
of  the"  and immediately  before the
phrase  "for  review  and recommenda-
tion" and inserting in its place the phrase
"Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory, Cincinnati."
  8. In § 136.5, the first sentence of para-
graph  (d)  is amended  by inserting the
phrase,   "proposed  by  the responsible
person or  firm making the discharge,"
immediately after  the phrase, "applica-
tion  for an  alternate  test  procedure,"
and immediately before the comma.
  The second sentence of paragraph (d)
is  amended  by   deleting  the   phrase,
"Methods Development and Quality .As-
surance Research Laboratory," immedi-
ately after the phrase, "to  the Regional
Administrator by the Director  of the,"
and  immediately preceding  the period
ending the sentence and inserting in  its
place the phrase, "Environmental Moni-
toring and  Support  Laboratory,  Cin-
cinnati."
  The third  sentence of paragraph (d)
is  amended  by  deleting  the   phrase
"Methods  Development and Quality As-
surance Research Laboratory," immedi-
ately after the phrase, "forwarded to the
Director," and immediately  before the
second  comma and by inserting  in  its
place the phrase, "Environmental Moni-
toring and  Support  Laboratory,  Cin-
cinnati."
  9.  Section 136.5 is  amended  by the
addition of a new paragraph (e)  to read
as follows:
                                 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 41, NO.  232—WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER  1, 1976
                                                            3-7

-------
52786                                       RULES  AND REGULATIONS
                                       § 136.5   Approval of alternate test  pro-
                                           cedures.
                                           *****
                                         >e)  Within ninety days of the receipt
                                       by the Director of the  Environmental
                                       Monitoring  and  Support Laboratory,
                                       Cincinnati  of  an  application for  an
                                       alternate test procedure  for nationwide
                                       use, the Director  of the  Environmental
                                       Monitoring  and  Support Laboratory,
                                       Cincinnati shall notify the applicant of
                                       his  recommendation  to  the  Adminis-
                                       trator to approve or reject the applica-
                                       tion, or shall specify additional informa-
                                       tion  which  is  required  to  determine
                                       whether  to approve the proposed  test
                                       procedure. After  such notification,  an
                                       alternate method determined by the Ad-
                                       ministrator to satisfy the applicable re-
                                       quirements of this part shall be approved
                                       for nationwide use to satisfy the require-
                                       ments of this subchapter; alternate test
                                       procedures determined by the Adminis-
                                       trator not to meet the applicable require-
                                       ments of this  part shall  be rejected.
                                       Notice of these  determinations shall be
                                       submitted for publication in the FEDERAL
                                       REGISTER not later  than 15 days after
                                       such .notification  and determination is
                                       made.
                                        [PR Doc.76-35032 Piled ll-30-76;8:45 am]
                           FEDERAL  REGISTER, VOL 41. NO. 232-WEDNESDAY. DECEMBEt 1,



                                                    3-8

-------
             APPENDIX 4
EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS


Pretreatment Standards for Oil and
Grease; Request for Public Comments

-------
17762
          PROPOSED  RULES
final location maps of all  survey  sta-
tions; and
  (2) All common depth point and high
resolution seismic data developed under
an exploration permit including the proc-
essed  information  derived  therefrom
with extraneous signals and interference
removed, in a format and quality suit-
able for interpretative evaluation,  re-
flecting state-of-the-art processing tech-
niques; and other data including, but not
limited to,  shallow  and deep subbottom
profiles,  bathymetry,  side-scan  sonar,
magnetometer,  and bottom  profiles;
gravity and  magnetic;  and  data from
special studies such as from refraction
surveys, velocity surveys and domal con-
figuration studies.

§ 251.15  Public availability  of  records.
  Geological and geophysical data, In-
cluding processed information relating
to submerged lands on the Outer Con-
tinental  Shelf collected pursuant to a
permit issued  after the publication  of
these regulations and required to be sub-
mitted to the Supervisor under this part,
shall be made available for public  in-
spection by  the Supervisor as follows:
   (a)  Geophysical data including proc-
essed information—ten years after issu-
ance of a permit to conduct exploration.
   (b)  Geological  data  and  processed
information:
   (1)  Immediate release through public
notice of the discovery during  drilling
operations of  oil  shows and environ-
mental hazards on unleased lands -when
these shows or hazards are judged to be
significant by the Director.
   (2)  Ten years after' issuance of  the
permit to conduct exploration except for.
deep stratigraphic drilling.
   (3)  Five years after the date of com-
pletion of a test well or 60 calendar days
after  the issuance of the first  Federal
lease within 50 geographic miles of the
drill site, whichever is earliest, for deep
stratigraphic drilling.
  CANCELLATION, PENALTIES AND APPEALS

§ 251.20   Revocation and cancellation.

  The Supervisor  is authorized to sus-
pend or revoke a permit under which the
operation is  being conducted, or is  pro-
posed to be conducted, which in his judg-
ment  threatens immediate,  serious,  or
irreparable harm or damage to life, in-
cluding aquatic life, to-property, to cul-
tural resources, to valuable mineral de-
posits, or to the environment, or for non-
compliance with applicable laws, regula-
tions,  the  terms and conditions  of  the
permit, OCS Orders, or any other writ-
ten order or rule,  including orders for
submitting reports, well records  or logs,
and analyses in a  timely manner.

§ 251.21  Penalties.
  Any person  who  conducts geological
and  geophysical  exploration   of   the
Outer Continental Shelf without a  per-
mit Issued  under this part or who, hav-
ing obtained a  permit, falls to  comply
with the terms of the permit will be sub-
ject  to  any civil or criminal remedies
which the Secretary chooses to  pursue.
§ 251.22  Appeals.

  Orders or decisions Issued under the
regulations in this part may be appealed
as provided in Part 290 of this chapter.
  [FR Doc.75-10409 Filed 4-21-75:8:46 am]

         DEPARTMENT  OF
         TRANSPORTATION

             Coast Guard
          [33 CFR Part 175)
             [CGD 74-159]
NONAPPROVED  LIFESAVING DEVICES ON
 WHITE WATER  CANOES AND KAYAKS

    Proposed Revocation of Exception;
       Comment Period Extension
  Iri the February 4, 1975 issue of the
FEDERAL REGISTER (40 FR 5167), the Coast
Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking proposing to revoke the ex-
ception in 33 CFR 175.17 from Personal
Flotation  Device  (PFD)   requirements
presently allowed for operators of white
water canoes and kayaks. The notice pro-
vided that all written comments received
before April 17, 3975 would be  consid-
ered before action would be taken on the
proposal.
  The  purpose of this  notice is to ex-
tend the  comment  period  to May 31,
1975 in order to give the public additional
time to submit written  data, views, and
arguments concerning the notice.
  All communications  received before
May 31, 1975 will be considered before
action is taken on the proposed revoca-
tion.
(Sec. 5 of the Federal Boat Safety Act  of
1971 (46 U.S.C. 1464); 49 CFR 1.46(0) (1))

  Dated: April 16,1975.

                    A. F. FUGARO,
         Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,
 Acting Chief, Office of Boating Safety.
  [FR Doc.75-10470 Filed 4-21-75:8:45 am]


  ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION
              AGENCY

          [40 CFR Part 450]
             IFRL- 361-7]

     EFFLUENT GUIDELINES AND
             STANDARDS
Pretreatment Standards for Oil and Grease;
      Request for Public  Comments
  During the past several months EPA
has proposed pretreatment standards for
existing  sources which discharge into
publicly owned treatment works and pro-
mulgated  pretreatment standards for
new sources which  discharge into pub-
licly owned treatment works, pursuant to
section  307  (b)  and (c) of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C.
section 1317.
  Internal review of these regulations by
EPA has led to the conclusion that addi-
tional consideration  should  be  given to
the question of the proper pretreatment
standard for the  discharge of oil  and
grease for all industrial categories.  The
Agency has  compiled additional  data
concerning this question. This data Is
summarized and analyzed in a document
entitled "Trcatability of Oil and  Grease."
  These data appear to indicate that no
pretreatment limitation should be placed
on the discharge of oil and grease of an
animal  or vegetable origin  where  such
wastes are essentially  free from petro-
leum or mineral based oil and greases. On
the other hand, where the oil and grease
is known to be derived from petroleum
or mineral sources or where the source
is unknown a pretreatment standard lim-
itation of 100 mg/1 on oil and grease ap-
pears to be most appropriate. The Agency
is presently considering inclusion of these
limitations in pretreatment standards for
all industrial  categories. However before
doing so, the  Agency desires to hear the
views of publicly owned treatment plant
operators, industrial  users and all other
interested parties.
  Information   concerning  the  data
which  supports the above  conclusions
and pertinent definitions and methodol-
ogy  are contained in  the  above men-
tioned document.  Copies of this docu-
ment are  available through the Office
of Public  Affairs,  Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Washington D.C. 20460,
Attention: Ms.  Ruth Brown, A-107.
  Interested persons may submit written
comments  in  triplicate  to Ms.  Ruth
Brown,  Office of Public Affairs, at  the
above address. Comments on all aspects
of this request  for public participation
are solicited. In the event comments are
in the nature of criticisms as to the ade-
quacy of  data which is  available,  or
which may be relied upon by the Agency,
comments should identify and, if possi-
ble, provide any additional  data which
may be available  and should  indicate
why such data is essential to the devel-
opment of the regulations.
  In the event comments address the ap-
proach taken by the Agency in establish-
ing pretreatment standards  for  existing
sources, EPA solicits suggestions as to
what alternative  approach should  be
taken and why  and how this alternative
better satisfies the  detailed requirements
of section 307 (b) of the Act.
  A copy of all public comments will be
available for  inspection and copying at
the EPA Freedom  t)f Information Cen-
ter, Room 204, West Tower, Waterside
Mall, 401  M Street SW., Washington,
D.C. 20460. The EPA information regula-
tion, 40 CFR 2, provides  that a reason-
able fee may  be charged  for copying.
  All comments received on or before
May 22, 1974, will  be considered.

  Date: April 15,1975.

                  RUSSELL E. TKAIN,
                      Administrator.
  [FR Doe.76-10478 Filed 4-31-75;9:45 amj
                                                       4-1
                                FEDERAL BEGISTER, VOL. 40, NO. 78—TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 1975

-------
                 APPENDIX 5
         POLLUTANT INTERFERENCE DATA

Effect on Biological Treatment Processes

Table & Figure No.              Pollutant

      5-1                       Ammonia
      5-2                       Arsenic
      5-3                       Borate  (Boron)
      5-4                       Cadmium
      5-5                       Chromium
      5-6                       Copper
      5-7                       Cyanide
      5-8                       Iron
      5-9                       Lead
      5-10                      Manganese
      5-11                      Mercury
      5-12                      Nickel
      5-13                      Silver
      5-14                      Sulfate
      5-15                      Sulfide
      5-16                      Zinc

-------
                                 TABLE  5-1

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF AMMONIA

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
10
100
5-200
480
200-1000
1500-3000
3000

Activated
Sludge
Processes
N
N

I



Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes


B

N
I
U
Nitrifi-
cation
Processes








Comments








References
E-29
E-29
E-29
E-29
E-29
E-17, E-20
E-ll
NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                     5-1

-------
                                            FIGURE  5-1

                                         EFFECT OF  AMMONIA

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
        Activated Sludge
            Processes
Ul
i
10
     Anaerobic Digestion
            Processes
        Nitrification
          Processes
                Inhibitory
                                                                    iiiiiiiinimjiiii*
                                                                 No Effect
                                                                                                 Upset
                                                                                   LiM


                                                                                   No Effect

                                                                  llltlHIIItlllllllllllllllM


                                                                     Beneficial   _
                   Inhibitory

               iiiinin
                                                           1.0
10
100
1000     10000
                                                             Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE  5-2

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF ARSENIC

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.1
0.1
1.0
1.6


Activated
Sludge
Processes
N
I
I


Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes



I

Nitrifi-
cation
Processes






Comments
Meta-Arsenate
AsCl,

4 mg/1 Sodium
Arsenate

References
E-29
E-21
E-21
E-5

NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to  the unit  processes
                                    5-3

-------
                                       FIGURE 5-2

                                    EFFECT OF ARSENIC

                            ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
  Activated Sludge
      Processes
Anaerobic Digestion
      Processes
  Nitrification
    Processes
             Inhibitory
                                           No Effect
                                                                Inhibitory
                          •f\r
                               0.001
0.01
0.1
1.0
                                                                        10
                                          100
                                       10
                               far
                                                    Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-3
                                DATA SUMMARY

                           EFFECT OF BORATE  (BORON)

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.005 -
0.05
0.05
0.4
2
7.4

10
50
74

100
740


Activated
Sludge
Processes
N

I
N

N

I
I
I

I
U

Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes




I









Nitrifi-
cation
Processes















Comments





50 mg/1 Sodium
Tetra-Borate


500 mg/1 Sodium
Tetra-Borate

5000 mg/1 Sodium
Tetra-Borate

References
E-29

E-5, E-29
E-8, E-9
E-128
E-8

E-9, E-29, E-4
E-29
E-8

E-44
E-8

NOTES;
B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                     5-5

-------
       Activated  Sludge
           Processes
Ul
     Anaerobic  Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                           FIGURE 5-3

                                         EFFECT OF BORON

                                ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
                                                                                      Utfset
                                                               	MiU
                    Inhibitory
                                           No Effect
             h—
                                                                  Inhibitory
                                  0.001    0.01
0.1
                                                                1.0
10
                             100
                                                                                            1000
                                                       Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-4

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF CADMIUM

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.02
1
10 - 50
60
100

Activated
Sludge
Proces-ses

T
I
U
T
Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes
T




Nitrifi-
cation
Processes






Comments






References
E-104
E-21
E-29
E-29
E-29
NOTES;
B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                      5-7

-------
                                              FIGURE  5-4

                                           EFFECT OF  CADMIUM

                                 ON  BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
Ul

00
     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                                                                       Upset
                                                                   L1Tril|————•"••""•••"I

                                                                        Inhibitory
                                                    Inhibitory
                                   0.001     0.01
0.1
1.0
10
                                                                                       100
                                        1000
                                                          Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-5

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF CHROMIUM

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.005^
0.05
0.25
1
1
1
1.5
2.5
5
5
7
8.8
5-10
10
10
15
4
0-50

Activated
Sludge
Processes
B

N
I
T




I
I
I
T
I



Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes





T


T








Nitrifi-
cation
Processes

I




U
U






I
I


Comments



K2Cr207





25% Loss in BOD
Removal
25 mg/1 I^C^Oy


29% Loss in BOD
Removal
Cr III

Cr III, No Effect
on Trickling
Filter Operation

References
E-5
E-119
E-5
E-5
A-l
A-l
E-13, E-29, E-ll
A-l
A-l
A-l
E-8
E-29, E-78
E-29, E-78
E-28
E-29
E-17
E-29
NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations represent influent  to  the unit  processes.
                                      5-9

-------
                                  TABLE 5-5 (continuted)

                                 DATA SUMMARY

                           EFFECT OF CHROMIUM

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration


mg/1
50

50
50
50
100


100

300
300
500
500
430 + 1440
Effect On
Activated
Sludge
Processes
I

I





I






Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes



N
U






U
U
U

Nitrifi-
cation
Processes





I




I



U



Comments
3% Loss in BOD
Removal



Reduced Nitrifi-
cation by
66-78%
3% Loss in BOD
Removal








References
E-118

E-88
E-3
E-118, E-78
E-5


E-118

E-118
E-118
E-118
E-29
E-29
NOTES;
B = Beneficial
N = No Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                    5-10

-------
                                            FIGURE 5-5

                                        EFFECT OF CHROMIUM

                                ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
      Activated Sludge
          Processes
m
i
    Anaerobic Digestion
          Processes
      Nitrification
        Processes
                                                                   ItiHIIilMIIIIII
                                                                        Inhibitory
                                                         No Effect
                                        I-
                                        Beneficial
                            Upset
                                                                  Inhibitory
                                                                      Upset
                                                            Inhibitory
                                   0.001     0.01
0.1
1.0
                                                                            10
100
                                        10
tor
                                                         Concentration mg/1

-------
                                  TABLE 5-6

                                 DATA SUMMARY

                           EFFECT OF COPPER

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.005-
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.5

0.5
0.5-0.56

0.7
1.0

1.0
1,0
1.2

2.4
2.5

Effect On
Activated
Sludge
Processes
B


T
T
N
N





T
T

N

I


I

Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes
















T


U


Nitrifi-
cation
Processes


I






I













Comments





With 5 mg/1 Zn
With CN
Toxic to all
Micro Organisms

Inhibition of
Micro Organisms



With CN

2% Loss in BOD
Removal
With 20 mg/1 Zn
4% Loss in BOD
Removal

References
E-29

E-100
E-2
E-33
E-5, E-29
E-118
E-5

E-2
E-29

E-l
A-l,E-2,E-5,E-24,
E-29.E-78.E-109
E-29
E-5, E-15
E-118

E-5, E-29
E-118

NOTES;

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset

Concentrations  represent  influent to  the unit  processes
                                      5-12

-------
                                 TABLE 5-6  (continuted)

                                DATA SUMMARY

                           EFFECT OF COPPER

                       ON  BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
3.6
4
5
5
5
10
10
10
1-10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15

Activated
Sludge
Processes
U
I
I

I
I
I
N
T


I
I
I
I
I

Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes



N





N
T





I
Nitrifi-
cation
Processes


















Comments
With 8.6 mg/1 CN



6% Loss in BOD
Removal
3.6% Loss in BOD
Removal
With CN 7% Loss
in BOD Removal



With CN
With 100 mg/1 CN
With 10 mg/1 Ni
With 100 mg/1
Cr04=
With 100 mg/1 Fe
5.3% Loss in BOD
Removal


References
E-16
E-29
E-29
E-118
E-118
E-118
E-118
E-29
E-29
E-118
E-118
E-29
E-29
E-29
E-29
E-118
E-118
NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations represent influent  to  the unit processes.
                                     5-13

-------
                                 TABLE 5-6 (continued)

                                DATA SUMMARY

                           EFFECT OF COPPER

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT  PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
15
25
25

30
45
50
50
64
75
100
210
410
1000

1000


Activated
Sludge
Processes
I

I

I
I
I

I
I
I
U
U




Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes

I





I





I

I

Nitrifi-
cation
Processes


















Comments


With CN 2.5% Loss
in BOD Removal









Cuprous 14.9% Loss
in Gas Production
Cuprous 49.4% Loss
in Gas Production

References
E-129
E-118
E-118

E-29
E-43
E-29
E-29
E-118
E-29
E-2, E-118
E-118
E-118
E-29

E-29

NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                     5-14

-------
U1
i
M
01
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
Anaerobic Digestion
      Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                              FIGURE 5-6

                                           EFFECT OF COPPER

                                 ON  BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
                                                                            Upset
                                                          Mliilll
                                                               Inhibitory
                                                No Effect
                                          ••••nvBKi^Hin

                                          Beneficial
                                                                          Upset
                                                                         Inhibitory
                                                                           !••••

                                                                        No Effect
                                                       Inhibitory
                                    0.001    0.01
                                                    0.1
1.0
                                                                              10
                                                                                  100
                                                                                                 10
                                for
                                                          Concentration rog/1

-------
                                  TABLE 5-7

                                 DATA SUMMARY

                           EFFECT OF CYANIDE

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.01-
0.05
0.1
0.3-
0.5
0.34
1
1
1.6
2
2
2
2
2-3
3
4
5
21
30
30
Effect On
Activated
Sludge
Processes
N

I
T

T
I


I
I
I
I



Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes

T

T
T


T








Nitrifi-
cation
Processes



I




I




U
I


Comments

In Raw Sewage

0.65 mg/1 NaCN
Reduced Nitrifi-
cation by 75%


As HCN



5% Reduction in
BOD Removal


40 mg/1 NaCN

Interfered with

References
E-118
A-l, E-5,
E-21
E-5
A-l
A-l
A-l •
E-5
E-5
A-l, E-5
A-l, E-5
A-l, E-5
A-l, E-5
A-l, E-5
E-15
E-5
E-5
E-7
NOTES-                                          Trickling
•^^•'                                          Filter Operation
B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory  Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent  to  the  unit processes

                                       5rl6

-------
                                 TABLE 5-7 (continued)

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF CYANIDE

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
40
100
100
100
480

Activated
Sludge
Processes
I

I
I
U
Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes

U



Nitrifi-
cation
Processes






Comments


With 10 mg/1 cu
With 10 mg/1 Ni
480 mg/1 KCN

References
E-29
E-5
E-29
E-29
E-29
NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations represent influent to  the unit  processes.

                                     5-17

-------
                                              FIGURE 5-7

                                          EFFECT OF CYANIDE

                                  ON  BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
Ul
M
cx>
     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                                                                               pset
                                                                       Inhibitory
                                                No Effect
                                    0.001    0.01
      Inhibitory
                                                                                         Upset
                                                                                    Upset
                                                                IMlillitlUMiliiHMMil

                                                                    Inhibitory
0.1
1.0
                                                                              10
100
                                                                                                 1000
                                                          Concentration nig/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-8

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF IRON

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0

0

5
5
5-20
100
1000
Effect On
Activated
Sludge
Processes


I

T


N
U
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes
I




T
I


Nitrifi-
cation
Processes

Comments
Lack of Iron








Inhibits Digestion
Lack of Iron
Reduces Metabolism


Due to Acidity



References
E-39, E-112

E-39, E-112

E-5
A-l
E-5, E-118
E-21
E-29
NOTES:
B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to the  unit processes.
                                      5-19

-------
                                             FIGURE  5-8

                                           EFFECT OF IRON

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
Ul
i
10
o
Anaerobic Digestion
      Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                                                                                   pset
                       ^pn*t*


                      Inhibitory
    I"
                                                                           Inhibitory
                            ^IIIHll



                            Inhibitory
                                                                     Inhibitory
                                    0.001    0.01
                                                   0.1
1.0
                                                                              10
100
                                                                                           1000
                                                          Concentration mg/1

-------
                                TABLE  5-9

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF LEAD

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
D.005-0.05
0.05
0.5
0.1-1.0
50
10-100

Acti vated
Sludge
Processes
N


I
N
I
Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes






Nitrifi-
cation
Processes

N
I




Comments







References
E-5
E-100
E-5
E-5
E-21
E-29
NOTES;

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to the unit  processes.
                                     5-21

-------
                                             FIGURE  5-9

                                           EFFECT OF LEAD

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
Ul
I
10
     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                                                     MllilllliMIIII
                      Inhibitory
                                          No  Effect
                                                        Inhibitory
                                    0.001
0.01
0.1
                                                                   1.0
                                 10
                               100
                                                                                                1000
                                                          Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-10

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF MANGANESE

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
7
10
50
12.5-50
50-100

Activated
Sludge
Processes
N
I
U

I
Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes





Nitrifi-
cation
Processes



B


Comments






References
E-29
E-29
E-21
E-29
E-29
NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
 Concentrations represent  influent  to the unit processes.
                                     5-23

-------
                                             FIGURE 5-10

                                        EFFECT OF MANGANESE

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
V    Anaerobic Digestion
^          Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                   0.001    0.01
                                                                                     Upset
                                                                                Inhibitory
                                                                No Effect
                                                                             Beneficial
0.1
1.0
                                                                             10
100
                                       100TT
                                                         Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-11

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF MERCURY

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.1 - 1.0
1.0
1.0
2.5
2.5
2.5-5
5
5
5
10
43
50
200
1365

Activated
Sludge
Processes
I
I
I
T
I
T
I
I
I
I

I
U

Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes










N


I
Nitrifi-
cation
Processes















Comments







14% Loss in COD
Removal
40% Loss in COD
Removal
59% Loss in COD
Removal





References
E-28
E-28
E-29
E-21
E-29, E-122
E-29
E-70
E-122
E-29
E-29
E-18
E-29
E-29
E-18
NOTES:
B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                     5-25

-------
                                             FIGURE  5-11

                                         EFFECT OF MERCURY

                                 ON  BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
10
     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                  I
                                  TJ
                                                                                           pset
                                                                    Inhibitory
                                   0.001    0.01
0.1
                                                                  1.0
10
100
                                                                                               10
                                         for
                                                         Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-12

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF NICKEL

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
1
2
1-2.5
2.5
0.5-3
5
5
10
10
10
25
25
40
50
500

Activated
Sludge
Processes
N

T
I

I
I
I


I
U

U

Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes

T







N


N

I
Nitrifi-
cation
Processes




I



I







Comments



2.5% Loss in
BOD Removal

5% Loss in BOD
Removal

5% Loss in BOD






9.4% Reduction in
Gas Production

References
E-118
A-l
A-l
E-118
E-25, E-118
E-118
E-29
E-118
E-118
E-118
E-118
E-19
E-29
E-3
E-5
NOTES:

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations represent influent to  the unit  processes
                                     5-27

-------
                                             FIGURE 5-12

                                          EFFECT OF NICKEL

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
m
i
to
00
Anaerobic Digestion
      Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                   0.001     0.01
                                                                                 t"
                                                                    Inhibitory
                                                            No Effect
                                                                    No Effect
                                                                      Inhibitory
                                                                Inhibitory
                                                   0.1
                                                                  1.0
10
                                                                                      Upset
100
                                                                                           1000
                                                         Concentration m.g/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-13
                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF SILVER

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
5

25
2-250


Activated
Sludge
Processes
I

U
N

Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes





Nitrifi-
cation
Processes






Comments
84% Loss in BOD
Removal

As Thiosulfate


References
E-8, E-9

E-21
E-8, E-9, E-120,
A-l
NOTES;

B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to  the unit  processes.
                                      5-29

-------
                                        FIGURE  5-13

                                     EFFECT OF  SILVER

                            ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
  Activated Sludge
      Processes
U1

o
Anaerobic Digestion
      Processes
  Nitrification
    Processes
                                                                              mil minium iiini
                                                                                 Upset
                                                                      Inhibitory
                               0.001    0.01
                                                        0.1
1.0
                                                                         10
100
1000
                                                     Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE 5-14

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF SULFATE

                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
500
2400

>2400

Activated
Sludge
Processes




Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes
I
I

U
Nitrifi-
cation
Processes





Comments

12* Reduction in
Gas Production


References
E-ll, E-17
E-19

E-19
NOTES:
B =
N =
T •
I =
U =
Beneficial
No Effect
Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
Inhibitory
Upset
Concentrations  represent influent to the  unit processes
                                    5-31

-------
                                             FIGURE 5-14

                                         EFFECT OF SULFATE

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
en
i
     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                                        K
                                                       Upset
                                                                                           Inhibitory
                                   0.001
0.01
0.1
1.0
                                                                             10
                                          100
                                        iooa

-------
                                TABLE 5-15

                               DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF SULFIDE
                      ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration


mg/1
25-50
50
50-100
100

100

165
200
200
200

400
400

Effect On
Activated
Sludge
Processes
I














Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes

I
N
I

I

U
U
N
I

N
I

Nitrifi-
cation
Processes


















Comments



50% Reduction in
Gas Production
33% Loss in Gas
Production


With Acclimation
80% Reduction in
Gas Production
FeS
95% Reduction in
Gas Production



References
E-35
E-20
E-120
E-19

E-20

E-19
E-19
E-35, E-120
E-20

E-35
E-20

NOTES;
B = Beneficial
N = No  Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent  influent to the  unit processes.
                                   5-33

-------
                                             FIGURE 5-15

                                          EFFECT OF SULFIDE

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
in
I
U)
     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                          [Inhibitory
                                                                                             Upset
                                                                                    Inhibitory



                                                                                  No Effect
                                   0.001    0.01
0.1
1.0
                                                                             10
100
                                        1000
                                                         Concentration mg/1

-------
                                 TABLE  5-16

                                DATA SUMMARY

                          EFFECT OF ZINC

                       ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
Concentration
mg/1
0.005-
0.08
0.3
0.08-0.5
0.08-0»5
1
2.5
5
5
2.5-10
10
5-10
10
,10
10
10-20
20
20
20

Activated
Sludge
Processes
N
T
I

I
N

T
T
N
T

I
N


I
I
Effect On
Anaerobic
Digestion
Processes






T




N


T
U


Nitrifi-
cation
Processes



I















Comments




With 10 mg/1 Cd




With CN


2% Loss in BOD
Removal



2% Loss in BOD
Removal


References
E-29
E-33
E-29
E-100
E-29
E-118
A-l, E-7
E-29, E-35
E-29
E-118*
E-29
E-3
E-118
E-22
E-6, E-78
E-118
E-118
E-67
 1000
NOTES:
I
E-5
B = Beneficial
N = No Effect
T = Threshold for Inhibitory  Effects
I = Inhibitory
U = Upset
Concentrations  represent  influent to  the unit  processes.

-------
                                             FIGURE 5-16

                                           EFFECT OF ZINC

                                 ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESSES
       Activated Sludge
           Processes
01

     Anaerobic Digestion
           Processes
       Nitrification
         Processes
                                                                  Inhibitory
                                            mi mi i mi mi nun
                                                     No Effect
                                                                       inmiiiii
                                   0.001     0.01
                                                                                    Upset
                                                                No Effect
                                                                            Inhibitory
                                                                            H
                                                        Inhibitory
0.1
1.0
                                                                             10
                              100
                              1000
                                                         Concentration mg/1

-------
                APPENDIX 6
POLLUTANT REMOVAL AND PASS THROUGH DATA
Computer Report No. 1 - Summary of POTW Removal Data
by EPA Region.

Computer Report No. 2 - POTW Categorization.

Computer Report No. 3 - POTW Removal Data, Reference
Information.

Computer Report No. 4 - POTW Removal Data Analysis,
24 Hr. Composite - 6 Hr. Simultaneous Composite,
Comparison of Results.

Computer Report No. 5 - POTW Removal Data Analysis, by
Plant category.

Computer Report No. 6 - Summary of POTW Removal Data.

Computer Report No. 7 - POTW Effluent Data Analysis.

Computer Report No. 8 - Summary of POTW Effluent Data.

Table 6-1 - Cumulative Frequency Distribution of
Removal Data.

Table 6-2 - Cumulative Frequency Distribution of
Effluent Data.

Evaluation of Limited Data

Table 6-3 - Removal and Effluent Data Summary for Oil
and Grease, Cyanide and Hexavalent Chromium

Table 6-4 - Removal in Biological Plants with Chemical
Addition, and Tertiary Plants

Table 6-5 - Removal in Biological and Secondary Treat-
ment Plants

Correlation Analyses

-------
                 APPENDIX 6
 POLLUTANT REMOVAL AND PASS THROUGH DATA (continued)
Regression Analyses
Table 6-6 - Correlation Coefficient

Table 6-7 - Correlation Coefficient (Log)

Table 6-8 - Regression Analyses - Influent Cone. (X)
vs. Effluent Cone. (Y)

-------
                             OF PW(M*eM6V«_ DATA BY EPA REGION                    DATE   5/15/75

                                     PLANT TYPE
               ft-1     0fHŁ-Ff a      B-J      OTHER B      Cl      OTHER C  0>J,(MISC)    TOTAL
REGION


 I             |S          06          0        12          0         0        33
 U            33          3          9          9         5         10         0        69
 ff*           -6-          5          3          9         1          5         1        24
 IV             5259345        33
 V             14          0         14         11        23         19         6        87
 VI             00110002
 Jig*            406162019
 Vftif           t          0          0          0         0          0         0         0
 f»             ««e-eoo«o
 X              10001002


               72         10         44         40        51         40        12       269

-------
                        RFPORT  NO.  t                POTW  CATEGORIZATION                       5/15/75 DATE
CATEGORY                     OE SCRIPT io<


A         PRIMARY  SEDIMENTATION  TREATMENT  PROCESS
AOl         CONVENTIONAL
A02         FLASH  AERATION  uhEAiJ OF  CL AW IF 1CAT IUN
A03         CHEMICAL  FLCCCIILATION, CLARIFICATION
A04         LlMt,  FERRIC  CHLORIDE AUUU10N,  PRIMARY  SEDIMENTATION, CLARIFICATION
AOS         PREAFRATION,  POLYMER ADDITION, PRIMARY SEDIMATION
B         TRICKLING FILTER
BOI         401, TRICKLING  FILTER, CLARIFIED
B02         AOl, TF-HIGH  KATE, CLARIFIED
B03         A04, TRICKLING  FILTKH, CLAP1FJEH
BO*         AOl, TF-?  IN  SERIES,  CLARIFIER
80S         AOl, TF-2  HIGH  HATE  IN SEKTFS. CLAR1FIER
C         ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Col         AOl, ACTIVATFO  SLUDGE, CLARIFIEH
C02         EXTENDED AERATION, CLAK1FIEW-NO  PRIMARY  SETT-IlMb
Cfl3         A04, ACflVATPO  SLUOOf , CLAKiFIEK
Co*         AOl, AS-POLYMER ADDITION, CLARIFIER
COS         AOl, AS-STEP  AF.KATION, CLARIFIEH
C06         AOl, AS-HIGH  RATE, CLARIFIER
Co?         coi, POLISHING  LAGOON
COS         EXTENDED AERATIUlM, ?  POLISHING LAGOONS IN SERIFS-NO PRIMARY SETTLING
C09         All, AS-KRALS PROCESS
ClO         AOl, AS-KRAUS PROCESS, 
-------
                            «t*»ORT NO, 2
                                             POTW CATEGORIZATION
5/15/75 DATE
    CATEGORY
                                 DESCRIPTION
                                                     NO. OF PLANTS
                                                                                          PERCENT OP TOTAL
.01
v
-------
REPORT NO. 3

REF.NO.
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.0}
5.02
6.00
7.01
7.02
8.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.no
15.00
15.01
J5.02
15.03
15.04
15.05
15.06
15.07
m 15.08
1 16.00
*" 18.00
19.00
20.00
21*00
22.00
23»00
24.00
25.01
25.02
25.03
26.00
?8»fl
-------
KFPORT NO.
REF.NO.
                      SAMPLING
         CATEGOHY
     PnTW REMOVAL DATA
   REFERENCE INFORMATION

SAMPLING DATE
                        DATE  5/15/75
                                                                                                              PAGE   2
46.00
47.00
48.00
49.00
50.00
51,00
52.f>0
^3.00
54.no
55.00
56.00
57. PO
58.00
5S.01
59.00
59,01
60.00
61.01
61.02
61.03
61.04
65.01
65.02
68.00
69.00
71.no
72.00
73.00
74.00
75.00
76.no
77.no
78.00
78.01
81.01
81 .02
81.01
Bl .04
fll.ns
fll.nft
92. ni
92. n?
92. ni
Q /* • 0 Ł4
Q ? • 0 ^
92. of.
92.08
Q2.09
9?. 1 0
92. 1 1
804-06H
C01-05A
C01-05H
C04-07A
C06-06A
C19-01H
C19-03H
C19-04G
C20-04A
C2U-06a
D01-04H
D02-04A
C01-01H
J01-01H
H03-05U
:03-04U
C14-09A
B02-08G
C01-05G
C01-07G
C01-U9u
A01-100
C01-08G
C01-08G
801-06G
B01-06G
H02-06G
C01-05G
B02-06G
A01-07G
A02-06G
tt02-05d
tin 1 -U9b
B05-1 Oi>
A01-09G
AOl-OflF
A01-080
HO 1-070
CO 1-06"
A01-06G
AQ1-07«
A01-07A
H01-07A
an 1 -06A
60 1 -0^-fl
A01-06'
/VQ1-07A
A 0 1 - 0 6 A
A01-06A
i-Ol -C^A
FC024S
G
C 0?4$
b
C 024S
C 024S
C 024S
FC024S
C 024S
C 024S
C 024S
C 024S
C 0?4S
C 0?4S
FC02tS
FC024S
FC024S
FC024R
FC024H
FC024K
FC024R
KC S
FC S
G
FC024S
FCOP4S
FC034S
f C024S
FC024S
FC024S
FC024S
^ CO?4S
Ij H
G ^
i-C S
Ft S
FC S
KC S
KC S
FC S
C 006S
C 006S
C OOfab
L Of)6S
C OOhS
C 006S
C 006S
C 006S
C OObS
L 0 0 h S
741023
7411717
740fOH
741022
740807
740723
740716
740522
740813
741106
740730
740710
740501
740501
740716
740716
740709
6310
6312
6307
6309
730622
730622
7301
741030
741106
741009
741106
741022
741126
741022
741121
730 /
730?
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506

















THRU



THRU
THRU
THRU








THRU
THRU
THRU
THRU
THRU
THRU
THRU
THRU



























6311



730802
730802
7312








/406
7406
7207
7207
7207
7207
7207
7207










REMARKS
                                                               EVERY 3 MR




                                                               EVERY 4 HR

                                                               FVERY HR

                                                               EVERY 3 HR
                                                               EVERY 2 HR
                                                               EVERY 2 HR
                                                               EVERY 2 MM
                                                               EVERY 2 HR

                                                               HOURLYfUOAY AVG
                                                               HOURLY. SOAY AVG
                                                               HOURLY* 14DAY «VG
                                                               HOURLY, 140AY AVG
                                                               DAILY, W* CUMP AVG
                                                               DAILY, WK COMP AVG
                                                               COMP WEEKLY »YR AVG
                                                               EVERY 30 MIN
                                                               FVERY 30
                                                               (-.VERY 30
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY 30 MIN

                                                               EVERY 30 MIN
                                                               tvERY 30 MIN
                                                               COMP MONTHLY, AVG
                                                               COMP MONTHLY»AVG
                                                               DAILY, 2WK COMP AVG
                                                               DAILY, 2toK COMP AVG
                                                               DAILY, 2WK COMP AVG
                                                               DAILY, 2WK COMP AVG
                                                               DAILY, 2WK COMP AVG
                                                               DAILY, 2WK COMP AVG
                                                               EVERY 15 MIN
                                                               EVERY is MIN
                                                               tVERY 15 MIN
                                                               tVERY 15 MIN
                                                               fVERY 15 MIN
                                                               EVERY is MIN
                                                               EVERY 15 MIN
                                                               EVERY 15 MIN
                                                               EVERY 15 MIN
                                                               KVERY 15 MIN
 MAJOR
INDUSTRY
                  NONE
                  PLATING
                  NONE
                  PLASTIC,MACM

                  NONE
                  NONE
                  PLASTIC
                  NONE

                  NONE
                  NONE
                                      POTW
                                    CONTROL

-------
REPORT NO. 3

REF.NO.
«*»«
92.13
92.14
92.17
92.18
92.19
92*?0
92.21
92.22
92.23
97.01
97.02
97.03
97.05
97.06
97.07
97.06
97,09
97.10
97.11
97.12
97.14
97.17
97.18
97. ?1
97.23
97.26
97.27
97.28
97.29
97,30
97.31
97,32
97»33
97.35
150.00
153.00
154.00
155.00
156.00
158.00
160.00
163.00
164.00
165.00
1*6.90
1*7. OJ

202.00

CATEGORY
BO 1 -OTA
B01-06A
B01-07A
A01-07A
C01-05A
C01-07A
C01-06A
C01-06A
A01-06B
A01-08B
C01-078
BO 1-068
C01-07B
A01-06E
A01-07B
801-07U
801-088
C05-078
C01-06A
C01-088
C05-086
B02-07C
C01-11C
C01-10B
A01-07A
C01-08C
601-07C
A01-07A
C01-06A
A01-06A
C05-Q6F
B04-06A
B04-07C
A01-06A
AO 1*068
CO 1-06 A
BOt- 4*A
C07-06G
C01-02H
B01-07G
C08-02G
C01.07A
COU06G
B01.06A
flOi-»06A
801.050
804.060
Aftt^ftl^jfc
A01-06F
SAMPLING
PBOCEOURE
C 006S
C 0065
C 0065
C 006S
C 0065
C 0065
C Ł065
C 0065
C 0065
C 006S
C 0245
C 024S
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 024-S
C 0245
C 024S
C 0245
C 024S
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 024S
C 024S
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 024S
C 024S
C 0245
C 0245
C 024S
C 0245
C 024S
C 0?4-S
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 0245
C 0Ł4S
C 024
C D24S
-C OftftK
C 0065
                                             POTW REMOVAL DATA
                                           REFERENCE  INFORMATION

                                        SAMPLING DATE
                         DATE  5/15/75
                       PAGE   3
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
6506
7201
7201
72&1
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
7201
740705
740626
740622
740621
740621
740618
740618
740827
741028
741028
741028
741028
7446*4
740516










THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
FHRu 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
THRU 7205
740706 740707

740623
740622 740623
740622 740623
740619 740620

THRU 740901
THRU 741030
THRU 741030
INf 741029 EFF
THRU 741031
7^0304
740201
 REMARKS
   MAJOR
  INDUSTRY
  POTW
CONTROL
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
                                                               EVERY
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
  15 MIN
                                                               EVERY HR» AVG

                                                               AVG
                                                               AVG
                                                               AVG
                                                               AVG
                                                               AVG 5 DAILY COMP
                                                               AVG 2 DAILY COMP
                                                               AVG 2 DAILY COMP
                                                               AVG
                                                               AVG
                                                               AVG
3 QAILY COMP
                   NONE
DYE
METAL PLAT
PLAT,DAIRY
PLAT,MEAT PKG

-------
KG.
                                                    UATA
                                     H'tFFRtNCfc INt-OHMATlON
                                                                                       DATt  5/lS/7b
                                                                                                        PAGE   4
RFP.NO.
203.00
204. on
2o5.no
206.00
207.00
208.00
209.no
210.00
21 l.no
212.no
213.00
214-.00
2l5.no
216. no
2l7.no
218.00
219.00
220.00
221.no
2?3.nn
2?4.no
225.no
226.00
227.no
229.00
231.00
232. no
233.00
234.00
235.00
236.00
237.00
238.00
239.00
240.00
241. PO
242.00
243.00
245.00
246.00
248.00
250.00
251.00
252.00
253.00
254.00
255.00
256.00
257.00
258.00
CATt'GO^Y
H02-07H
«01-07A
A03-06A
A01-05A
B01-06H
A01-06A
A01-05A
ri01-07A
A01-06*
A01-09A
A04-060
B01-06H
A01-06H
A01-06H
A0.1-OPC
A01-09L!
801-06H
C01-09A
B01-06A
A01-08A
A01-06A
A01-08A
A01-05A
A01-06A
A01-07A
ri02-06b
A01-09A
b)02-06A
A01-08A
A01-08A
&01-06A
riO?-06A
A01-06A
C05-04A
A01-05A
A01-05A
A01-01A
A01-03A
A01-01A
H02-06A
B01-05A
A01-03A
B01-06A
A01-05A
C01-07A
b02-05«
S02-05A
C01-06B
C01-OAA
R02-06A
<;.-t«PL ING
PKOCtUUKE
C
C
I.
C
c
c
c
c
c.
c
c
c
c
c
c
L
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
nn6s
OObS
npbs
OObS
006S
0065
006S
d(U>s
(lObb
00 OS
006S
006S
OOfeS
(1065
HObS
UObS
0065
0065
0065
nnbS
OObS
OObS
006S
0065
OObS
OObS
nobS
OObS
006S
0065
006S
onhs
OObS
OObS
0065
0065
006S
ones
OObS
006S
024
024
0?4
0?4
n?<»
02t
024
024
024
0?4
SAMPLING DAlt
740626
740618
740*16
740108
740506
740429
74iil]fl
740J?7
740429
740dl2
740531
740207
740701
74050B
740131
730927
740621
740702
740626
740401
740619
740621
740114
740604
740221
740228
740513
740809
740618
740506
74012S
740424
740627
740125
740122
740201
740617
740424
740618
740301
740205
740328
740124
740220
740129
740129
740326
740220
740827
741017



730828
740318
740208
730731
7«»0115
740307

740221
730907

740308
730925




740114





731220
740226


740315
731119
7402^7


730906
730223

740129

731220
740919

0709 0808
0820 1010
0418 0611
0620 0711
0815 1010
0606 0827
1022 1126











































0919
1?12
0702
0801
1210
1022


                                                              KEMAKIVS
                                                              ...A	
                                                                                    MAJOR
                                                                                   INOUSTWY
                                            POTW
                                          CONTROL
                                                                                 NONE
                                                         AVG
                                                         flVG
                                                         AVG
                       NONF
                       NONE
                                                                                 NONE
                                                         AVG
                                                         AVG
                                                         AVG
                                                         AVG
                                                         AVG
                                                         AVG
                                                         AVG
AVG
1974 AVG

AND 741008 1212AVG
1974 AVG
0813 0904 1001
0813 0910 1001
1974 AVG
1126 1974 AVG
1974 AVG
                                                                        AVG
                                                                        AVG

-------
      REPORT NO. 3
               CATEGORY
                            SAMPLING
         POTW REMOVAL DATA
       REFERENCE INFORMATION

    SAMPLING DATE
                                                                        REMARKS
                                                                                               DATE  5/15/75
                                                                                                                PAGE  5
                                                                                            MAJOR
                                                                                            INDUSTRY
                                                                                                 POTW
                                                                                               CONTROL
CO
260.00
263.00
264.00
266.00
267.00
269.00
270.00
271.0O
272.00
274.00
276.PO
277.00
280*00,
281.00
282.00
284.00
285.00
286.00
287,00
288.00
   291.00
   292.00
   Ł95*00
   296*00
   297.00
299.00
300.00
301.00
302.00
303,01
304.00
305.00
306.00
307*00
308.00
Jt/ f • "if i&. 7306?2
730618 THRU 730620
                           AVG
                           AVG

                           AVG
                           AVG
                           AVG

                           AVG
                           AVG
                           AVG
                           AVG
                                                                   EVERY  is
                                                                   EVERY  6   MIN
                                                                   EVERY  15  MIN
                                                                   EVERY  15  MIN
                                                                   EVERY  id  MIN

                                                                   EVERY  15  MIN
                                                                   EVERY  6   MIN
                                                                   EVERY  15  MIN
                                                                   15 MIN,2  DAY  AVG

                                                                   EVERY  15  MIN
                                                                   EVERY  HH

                                                                   EVERY  MR
                                                                     EVERY fe)R
                                                                     EVERY 3HR
                                                                      EVERY  HR.INF GRAB
                                                                      EVERY  HR
                                                                      INF  BY  POTW  EON
                                                                      EVERY 2HR
                                                                      EVERY HR
                                                                      EVERY 1 MR
   314.02
               C01-06G
                                          730621 THRU  730623
                                                  DAIRY

                                                  MEAT PACKING
                                                                                            BREWERY
                                                                                            NONE
                                                                                          POTATO  CHIP
                                                                                          PAINT.  OIL
                                                                                          METAL.PLASTIC
                                                                                          METAL

                                                                                          SLAUGHTER
                                                                                          DAIRY PROD
                                                                                          NONE
                                                                                          METAL
                                                                                          METAL
                                                                                          NONE
                                                                                          NONE
                                                                                          METAL

                                                                                          NONE
                                                                                          PAPER  MILL
                                                                                          FOOD  PROCESS
                                                                                          MFG,DAIRY
                                                                                          TEXTILE DYE
                                                                                          DAIRY-PLASTIC
                                                                                          NONE
                                                                                          ROOFING MFG.
                                                                                          PAPER-PAINT

-------
      RFPORT  NO.  3
  REF.NO.
CATEGORY
315.
-------
 REPORT NO.4
NOTEl (NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETED)
             POTm REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS
24 HR COMPOSITE - 6 HR SIMULTANEOUS COMPOSITE,  COMPARISON OF  RESULTS
           PAGE  1
                          5/23/75
Al
                              Bl
Cl
00550 OIL-GREASE
TOT-SXLT MG/L



00556 OIL-GRtAbE
SEP-FUNNEL MG/L



00560 OIL-GREASE
INFRARED MG/L



00500 RESIDUE
TOTAL, TS MG/l



f 00530 RESIDUE
M TOT NFLT» SS MG/L
o


00310 BOD
50AY MG/L



00340 COD
HI LF.Vti. MG/L



00335 COO
LOW LEVEL MG/L



0034? SEA COO
SALINE MG/L



NO.
MAX
MJN
MEAN
<:Tn.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STQ.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
sro.oev
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
5.00
64.81
12.50
39.63
23.68
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.00
40. 9t>
1.37
11.60
11:78
15.00
67. 7H
21.45
41.37
15.41
11.00
39.26
0.0
17.60
13.92
10.00
81.77
4.68
27.15
22.12
1.00
19.39
19.39
19.39
0.00
2.00
19.39
0.0
9.70
13.71
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0

      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0

      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0

     10.00
     44.82
      5.15
     27.65
     13.11

     27.00
     91.89
     16.79
     57.20
     17.75

     37.00
     88.70
      0.0
     34.87
     22.60

      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0

      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0

      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
      0.0
                         24
2.00
62.00
22.00
42.00
28.28
1.00
95.50
95.50
95.50
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.00
31.40
0.62
18.42
7.96
23.00
96.55
2b.86
70.39
19.43
IB. 00
95.20
41.43
76.74
15-07
15.00
93.32
34.38
68.64
17.03
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.00
78.48
61.65
71.15
8.62
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.00
63.33
14.03
37.70
19.19
6.00
96. 5»
19.72
68.94
37.34
9.00
90.88
4.76
69.10
31.38
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
Q.O
                                                       24
4.00
Sfl.49
1.29
66.57
38.26
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.00
63.91
7.44
3?. 85
16.12
29,00
9B.54
33.33
78.21
20.19
25.00
97.58
51.22
84.27
13.18
19.00
92.86
23.70
71.95
17.41
1.00
91.72
91.72
91.72
0.00
5.00
93.35
5?. 34
75.03
1.6.. 10
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.00
51.64
12.30
34.14
20.03
9.00
97.37
40.32
73.54
21.23
13.00
96.84
64. 58
86.49
9. BO
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

-------
 REPORT NO.4
NOTE: (NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETED)

PARAMETERS
             POTW REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS
24 HR COMPOSITE - 6 HH SIMULTANEOUS COMPUSIft, COMPARISON OF RESULTS
                                                                       PAGE  2
                          5/23/75
                                      Al
                              Bl
Cl
                                 24
32730
PHENOL ICS
4AAP DISTIL UG/L



00945




00665



SULFATE
MG/L



TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS MG/L



00610
AMMONIA



<* 00625
H- KjELDAHL,
H


0100? TOT
AS



01027 TOT
cn



01034 TOT
CR



01051 TOT
PB






NITROGEN,
MG/L



NITROGEN,
TOTAL. MG/L



ARSEMC
UG/L



CADMIUM
UG/L



CHROMIUM
UG/L



LEAD
UG/L



NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MTN
MEAN
STO.UEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.QEV
NO.
MAA
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.UEV
NO.
MAX
MTN
MEAiN
STD.UEV
NO.
MAX
Ml IN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OtV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
1.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
0.00
4.00
57.89
0.0
16.06
27. 9S
5.00
16. 2b
O.'J
9.65
6.42
10.00
61.05
0.0
19.08
21.08
6.00
59.72
U.O
21.32
21.88
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
13.00
25.00
0.0
5.77
10.96
14.00
80.00
0.0
31.49
32.10
15.00
88.24
0.0
16.66
29.12
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.00
27.78
0.0
7.12
10.93
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
28.00
64.29
0.0
20.91
14.97
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
9.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
*«»««»»
11.00
66.67
0.0
18.11
P2.99
8.00
50.00
0.0
18.75
20.77
6.00
79.41
0.0
50.57
30.26
4.00
79.74
2.80
34.2V
32.44
11.00
52.54
9.14
26.12
14.25
15.00
99.49
2.78
47.81
29.37
10.00
85.31
7.00
40.36
26.48
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
13.0,0
75.00
0.0
24.24
28.80
17.00
98.94
0.0
47. 8J
32.42
15.00
92.97
0.0
36.22
29.96
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.00
43.75
17.14
28.66
12-40
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.00
37.50
5.26
17. 0«
13.71
1.00
93.68
93.68
93.68
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
*******
6.00
50.00
0.0
20.00
24.49
3.00
90.00
0.0
30.00
51.96
a. oo
98.26
n.o
52.90
37.05
5.00
25.42
5.71
18.40
7.51
20.00
92.31
9.72
49.96
26.34
21.00
98.00
3.79
45.49
33.68
10.00
91 .67
10.71
37.00
25.89
1.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
0.00
15.00
80.00
0.0
18.36
29.97
21.00
98.33
0.0
61.41
33.02
24.00
95.00
0.0
46.80
3?. 43
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.00
38.57
0.0
19.29
27.27
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.00
84.21
6.69
36.23
23.75
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0.
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00

-------
 RFPORT NO. it
NOTE: (NEGATIVE

PARAMETERS
                 REMOVALS DELETED)
             POTW REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS
24 HH COMPOSITE - 6 HR SIMULTANEOUS  COMPOSITE,  COMPARISON  OF  RESULTS
                                                                                                             PAGE   3
                                                                                                                            5/23/75
                                       Al
'M9oo  TOT  MERCURY
HG               UG/L
0104?  TOT  COPPER
Cti              UG/L
01097 TOT ANTIMONY
                 UG/l.
01067 TOT NICKEL
NI              UG/L
01147 TOT SELENIUM
                UG/L
01077 TOT SILVER
AG              UG/L
01092 TOT ZINC
ZN              UG/L
01102 TOT TIN
                UG/L
00680 TOT ORG CARBON
fOTAL.TOC       MG/L
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NU.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.BE v
a. oo
75.00
0.0
31.70
34.10
15.00
77.27
0.0
32.54
27.12
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.00
92.19
0.0
9. 64
25.43
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.00
66.67
0.0
37.33
21.99
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.00
50.94
6.82
24.06
16.20
7.00
75.00
0.0
26.43
30.51
IB. 00
46. Ha
0.0
13.17
15. 84
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
»««««*«
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.00
68.75
0.0
19.70
19.27
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0*0
22.00
56.43
0.0
24.69
is.ae
                                                                     Bl
6.00
61.54
0.0
30.93
26.19
19.00
95.23
16.67
54.4>J
23.79
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.00
86.39
0.0
19. 9b
25.61
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.00
87.88
0.0
47.74
24.34
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.00
76.76
60.59
70.51
8.69
2.00
66.67
50.00
58.33
11.79
7.00
85.00
0.0
49.57
33.46
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
«*««»««
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.00
70.42
20.00
42.05
18.54
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.00
84.13
56.32
72.35
11.44
                                                                                                  Cl
                                                                                              ?4
17.. 00
99.58
n.o
SO. 74
30.20
25.00
9?. 31
14.29
63.10
?2.54
n.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.00
80.00
0.0
21.67
24.39
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
27.00
99.29
0.0
62.87
27.13
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
4.00
87.78
70.90
78.07
7.04
1.00
81.25
81.25
HI. 25
0.00
5.00
64.29
25.00
46.52
16.93
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.00
66.67
52.94
59.80
9.71
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.00
74.07
41.94
64.12
15.10

-------
 REPORT NO.4
NOTE: (NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETED)
             POTW REMOVAL UAfA ANALYSIS
24 HR COMPOSITE - (S HP, SIMULTANEOUS COMPOSITE, COMPARISON OF RESULTS
                                                                       PAGE  4
                                                                                                                             5/23/75
                                       Al
                                  24
                                                                     HI
                                                                                                   Cl
0110* TOT ALUMINUM
AL UG/L



01045 TOT IPON
FF UG/L



OlOSc TOT "A.vGANESt
MN >JG/I.



0072" CYANlRtt
TOTAL MG/L



3H260 I"PAS
MG/I



0103' MFXAVfLEi\T
CHRO'TU"* UP/I. AS Ctv



On60=; MTROGEN,
ORGANIC MG/L


00666 HISSOLVEO
PHOSPHOPU? MG/L.



01040 CGHPtU,
DissoLvro MC-/L AS Cu



NO.
MAX
MTU
MEAN
STD.UEV
NO,
MAX
MIN
N>FA|\!
STD.UtV
NlO.
MAX
MJiM
Mt'fiN
s ro.uEv
NU.
MAX
^ I N
l*FAi\
STII.UtV
NT,.
I»-AX
MJC.
M r-" A IM
STD.OtV
NO.
iv'AX
,V1JI\I
N'fAlw
STU.Dt V
^U.
MAX
MF.AiV
STD.UtV
NO.
MAX
M.TN
MFAN
STD.UEV
NO.
MAX
Mil1*
MEAK
STD.UEV
1.00
10. HI
10. 8/
10.87
0.00
10.00
88.8-3
13.7-^
37. 3J
24. 9/
6.00
33. 3J
2.9U
12. 1-J
10.87
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
u.Ou
2.00
90.H6
1 n.6 1
50. 7b
56.71
3.00
0.0
0.0
0 . 0
»»»*«»*
3.0U
63.6"*
30.49
31.41
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             o.u
                                             0.0
                                             o.o

                                            H.OO
                                            75.00
                                             0.0

                                            19.45

                                             7.00
                                            81.25
                                             0.0

                                            29.89

                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             0.0

                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             O.U
                                             O.u
                                             0.0

                                             O.U
                                             O.U
                                             O.U
                                             0.0
                                             O.U

                                             7.00
                                            69.23
                                             9.09
                                            43.66
                                            21.00

                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             0.0
                                             O.U

                                            23.00
                                            65.00
                                             0.0
                                            18.7^
                                            17.07
2.00
41.67
0.0
20.83
29. 4b
9.00
f9.86
U.O
42.45
22.10
5.0')
bt.54
16.5?
4b.36
1H.OV
2.01
0.0
0.0
0.0
iHXHHHHt
5.00
76.24
Jb.4?
60.40
22. OS
b.OU
6U.O'J
o.n
29. 4^
30.02
4.0d
66.67
U.O
35.41)
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.n
o.o
3.0U
a/, so
4h.6 '
6.3.39
21.40
3.01'
u.n
U.O
0.0
««*«»«»
o.n
u.n
o.n
U.O
o.o
u.o
U.O
o.o
o.o
o.o
u.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
U.O
2.00
75.no
66.67
70. H3
                         1.00
                        14.81
                        14.81
                        14.6)
                         O.OU

                         0.0
                         0.0
                         0.0
                         0.0
                         0.0
 0.0
 U.O
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0

 6.00
62.50
 0.0
37.24
23.09
                                                                                              24
?.oo
31.03
0.0
15.52
21 .94
15.00
97.67
7.70
59.73
?9.85
4.00
42.86
3.33
IP. 83
17.63
4.00
98.21
0.0
54.86
44.78
6.00
93.52
33.76
63.70
24.52
4.00
54.29
0.0
13.57
?7.14
9.00
94.60
14.49
61.30
27.71
2.00
49.15
43.42
46.29
4.05
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.00
97.50
42.66
77.79
30.34
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.00
85.71
76.92
81.81
4.09
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.00
87.50
12. SO
56.09
28.97

-------
 REPORT NO.4
NOTE: (NEGATIVE REMOVALS DfcLETEO)
             POTW RtMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS
24 HH COMPOSITE - 6 HR SIMULTANEOUS COMPOSITE,  COMPARISON OF  RESULTS
PAGE  5
                                                                                                                            5/23/75
                                 24
                                      Al




















ffl
1
t--
t*

















01030
DISSOLVED



0104<5
DISSOLVED



01065
DISSOLVED



01025
DISSOLVED



01056
DISSOLVED



71890
DISSOLVED



7Q507
PHOSPHATE



00690




CHRQMIUM.
MG/L AS CR



LEAD,
MG/L AS PB



NICKEL,
MG/L AS Nl



CADMIUM,
MG/L AS CD



MANGANESE,
MG/I. AS MN



MERCURY,
MC/L AS HG



TOT ORTHO-
MG/L



TOT CARBOI*
MG/L AS c



NO.
MAX
WIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NU.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.
MAX
MTN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STB.BEV
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1*00
6.10
6.10
6.10
o.oc
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0*0
28.00
80.65
0.0
15.59
22.92
31.00
66.67
0.0
10.22
21.81
29.00
50.00
0.0
4.09
12.58
31.00
25.00
0.0
0.81
4.49
18.00
21.43
0.0
5.65
7.14
20.00
84.21
0.0
21.28
26.16
21.00
82.93
0.0
28.12
20.66
26.00
57.01
0.0
22.29
16*05
                                                                    81
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.00
5o.no
u.o
8*33
20.41
6.0U
90.00
0.0
33.06
40.69
6.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
»»•«»»«
6.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
•*»**»*
5.00
35.71
0.0
12.14
17.05
2.00
50.00
22.22
36.11
19.64
4.00
25.42
9.09
16.15
6.82
5.00
83.80
52.09
68.35
12.71
                                                                                             ?4
                                                            C]
0.0
0.0
0.0
n.o
o.o
O.P
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
P.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.00
65.67
0.0
22.61
28.92
9.00
0.0
0.0
, 0.0
«»»**•»
9.00
55.56
0.0
12.23
24.28
9.00
57.14
0.0
11.90
23.69
5.00
92.86
0.0
34.57
37.57
7.00
14.29
0.0
2.04
5.40
8.00
63.64
2.33
38.43
22.45
4.00
61. 3J
34.02
52.29
12.76

-------
   REPORT NO.4

  NOTE! (NEGATIVE: REMOVALS DELETED)


  PARAMETFRS
             POTW REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS                                PAGE  6

24 HR COMPOSITE - 6 HR SIMULTANEOUS COMPOSITE, COMPARISON OF RESULTS                  5/23/75
                                        Al
                                   24
00650
PHOSPHATE



00671
TOTAL
MG/L



DISSOLVED
ORTHOPHOSPH4 TE MG/L



01037




01007







COBALT, TOT
U(VL as CO



BARIUM, TOT
UG/L AS BA



NO.
"AX
M'IN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO,
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NU.
MftX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
3.00
46.55
1.56
18.67
24. 3S
2.00
20.00
J.&-4
13.95
8.56
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
9.00
34.88
7.69
22.47
9.42
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
                                                                 24
2.0'V
11.75
1.35
6.55
7.35
3.00
50.59
2.17
24.13
24.52
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.n
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.00
53.57
41. 1H
45.56
6.95
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
                                                                                                     ci
                                                                                                24
4.00
24.10
16.98
20. B3
3.49
2.00
96.80
84.21
90.51
8.90
0.0
0.0
0.0
n.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.00
63.16
39.39
48.16
13.05
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ffl
I

-------
 REPORT NO.^
NOTE! NEGATIVE REMOVALS  DELETED

(PARAMETERS          CATFbOKY
V                    	>
00550     OIL-GREASE   NO.POTW
TOT-SXLT        MG/L     MAX
            POTW RtMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS BY PLANT
                                                          PAbt  1
             5.00
            04.81
            12.50


00556 OIL-GREASE
SEP-FUNMtL MG/L



00560 OIL-dREASF
INFRARED MG/L



00500 HFSIODE
TOTAL, TS MG/L



00530 HFSIUUE
a. TOT NFLT, S3 MG/L
I
i_i
a\

00310 BOD
5DAY MG/L


MF.AN
STH.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIlj
MEAN
STO.DFt/
NO. POTW
MAX
M I N
MK AN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
^EAll
STO.DEi/
NO.POTw
MAX
MIN
,VEAN
STO.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
v IN
MKAN
'39.63
2J.9"
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.U
0.0
0.0
0.0
[i.O
v i . o o
44. &
-------
 REPORT NO.5
NOTE: NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETED
IPARAMETERS         CATEGORY
v                   	*>
32730     PHENOLICS   NO.POTW
4AAP DISTIL     UG/L    MAX
                        MIN
                       MEAN
                                                           POTW  REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS BY PLANT
                                                                                                         PAGE  2
00945
SULFATE
      MG/L
                      STD.OEV

                      NO.POTW
                        MAX
00665      TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS      MG/L
             MEAN
            STD.OEV

            NO.POTW
              MAX
              MIN
             Mf AN
            STO.OEV

            NO.POTW
              MAX
              MIN
             MEAN
            STD.OEV
00625     NITROGEN,    NO,POTW
KJELOAHL, TOTAL MG/L     MAX
                         MIN
                        MEAN
                       STD.UtV
00610
AMMONIA
          NITROGEN,
                MG/L
0100? TOT ARSENIC
AS              UG/L
01027 TOT CADMIUM
CO
      UG/L
01034 TOT CHROMIUM
CR              UG/L
                      NO.POTW
                        MAX
                        MIN
                       MEAN
                      STD.OEV

                      NO.POTW
                        MAX
                        MIN
                       MEAN
                      STD.DtV

                      NO.POTW
                        MAX
                        MIN
                       MEAN
                      STD.OEV
01051 TOT LEAD
PB
            NO.POTW
      UG/L    MAX
              MIN
             MEAN
            STD.DEV
Al

 1.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
 0.00

13.00
57.89
 0.0
 9.88
17.14

 5.00
16.25
 0.0
 9.65
 6.42

38.00
64.29
 0.0
20.43
16.50

 6.00
59.72
 0.0
21.3?
21.88

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

28.00
45.45
 0.0
 6.37
12.17

31.00
80.00
 0.0
25.43
26.36

28.00
88.24
 0.0
20.10
25.04
OTHER A

    1.00
   25.00
   25.00
   25.00
    0.00

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    3.00
   52.38
   20.00
   32.23
   17.59

    7.00
   26.87
    1.15
   15.37
    8.65

    1.00
   24.39
   ?4.39
   24.39
    0.00

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    3.00
   76.47
    0.0
   25.49
   44.15

    6.00
   69.15
    7.89
   33.47
   26.12

    8.00
   77.88
    0.0
   32.08
   29.53
81

 7.00
79.41
 0.0
52.14
27.94

 8.00
79.74
 2.80
31.48
22.93

14.00
53.57
 9.14
27.90
14.53

23.00
99.49
 2.78
38.86
27.52

12.00
93.68
 7.00
46.33
28.70

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

18.00
75.00
 0.0
24.65
27.08

27.00
98.94
 0.0
41.92
31.68

21.00
93.42
 0.0
40.26
33.29
OTHER 8

     5.00
    85.00
     7.74
    48.18
    31.35

     3.00
    18.18
     6.38
    12.69
     5.94

    12.00
    99.42
     0.0
    30.03
    32.64

    26.00
    98.98
     0.0
    45.26
    33.49

     9.00
    88.72
    16.86
    59.02
    26.89

     3.00
    33.33
     0.0
    22.22
    19.24

    18.00
    66.67
     0.0
    13.96
    21.86

    22.00
    85.71
     0.0
    33.83
    28.44

    21.00
    84.62
     0.0
    31.98
    29.68
Cl

 6.00
98.26
 0.0
52.90
37.05

 8.00
38.57
 0.0
17.28
12.40

22.00
92.31
 9.72
50.44
25.20

32.00
98.00
 3.79
42.58
30.24

10.00
91.67
10.71
37.00
25.89

 1.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
 0.00

19.00
80.00
 0.0
15.08
27.32

27.00
98.33
 0.0
60.15
32.23

29.00
95.00
 0.0
42.96
32.83
                                                                                                        OTHER C
 10.00
 96.05
 69.23
 84.68
 9.57

 7.00
 64.58
 0.0
 11.52
 23.63

 19.00
 90.60
 0.0
 40.79
 27.87

 22.00
 99.70
 9.76
 60.50
 31.57

 8.00
 93.60
 4.55
53.62
33.40

 6.00
60.00
 0.0
 19.72
30.56

29.00
87.69
 0.0
 15.56
25.88

33.00
 92.31
 0.0
 37.43
 32.13

 28.00
 90.65
 0.0
 36.31
 31.99
                                                                                                                  5/23/75
MISC(D.J)

    4.00
   89.47
    0.0
   64.69
   43. 22

    1.00
   60.69
   60.69
   60.69
    0.00

    5.00
   69.74
   20.91
   42.34
   20.16

    7.00
   97.00
    0.0
   70.19
   37.25

    0.0
    0*0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    5.00
   50.00
    0.6
   16.00
   23.02

    6.00
   77.01
    0.0
   37.72
   36.95

    8.00
   93.33
    6.25
   43.35
   32.46

-------
 REPORT NO.5
NOTE: NEGflTIVF REMOVALS DELETED
POTW REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS BY PLANT
(PARAMETERS CATEGORY
71900 TOT MERCURY
HG UG/L



0104? TOT COPPER
Cu UG/L



01097 TOT ANTIMONY
UG/L



01067 TOT NICKEL
NI UG/L



01147 TOT SELENIUM
m UG/L
h->
00

01077 TOT SILVER
AG UG/L



0109? TOT ZINC
ZN UG/L



0110? TOT TIN
UG/L



00660 TOT ORG CARBON
T0?*l,.TOC M6/L



NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STU.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OtV
NO.HUTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DtV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POT*
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.UEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MM
MfK
MEAN
STD.BEV
Al
19.00
75.00
0.0
29.79
28.65
39.00
77.27
0.0
23.8
-------
 REPORT NO.5
NOTE: NEGATIVE REMOVALS  DELETED
POTW REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS BY PLANT
                                                                                                         PAGE.
(PARAMETERS CATEGORY
01105 TOT
AL



01045 TOT
FE



01055 TOT
MN



00720
TOTAL



38260




01032
CHROMIUM,



00605
ORGANIC



00666
PHOSPHORUS



01040
DISSOLVED



ALUMINUM
UG/L



IRON
UG/L



MANGANESE
UG/L



CYANIDE,
MG/L



MBAS
MG/L



HEXAVALENT
UG/L AS CR



NITROGEN,
MG/L



DISSOLVED
MG/L



COPPER,
MG/L AS CU



NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.PQTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTU
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
Al
1.00
10.87
10.87
10.87
0.00
21.00
88.89
0.0
40.43
21.89
13.00
81.25
0.0
13.67
22.32
1.00
5«o
0.0
0.0
0.00
2.00;
90.8^
10.67
50.76
56.71
3.00
0.0
6.0
0.0
««»««««
10.00
69.23
1.17
39.71
23.53
l.UO
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
23.00
65.00
0.0
18.74
17.07
                                               OTHER A

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   7.00
                                                  73.64
                                                   0.0
                                                  35.82
                                                  22.42

                                                   3.00
                                                  29.73
                                                   7.38
                                                  18.82
                                                  11.19

                                                   1.00
                                                  66*67
                                                  66.67
                                                  66'. 6 7
                                                   0.00

                                                   2.00
                                                  19.15
                                                  16.67
                                                  17.91
                                                   1.76

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   1.00
                                                  30.30
                                                  30.30
                                                  30.30
                                                   0.00
      Bl

       3.00
      91.09
       0.0
      44.25
      45.60

      14.00
      87.50
       0.0
      48.60
      24.39

       9.00
      64.54
       0.0
      30.57
      26.70

       3.00
      80.00
       0.0
      26.67
      46.19

       5.00
      78.24
      35.43
      60.40
      22.05

       5.00
      60.00
       0.0
      29.45
      30.02

       6.00
      75.00
       0.0
      47.21
      28.19

       1.00
      14.81
      14.81
      14.81
       0.00

       6.00
      62.50
       O.Q
      37.24
      23.09
UTHER B

     2.00
    89.58
    75.00
    82.29
    10.31

    16.00
    89.83
     0.0
    50.44
    27.70

    13.00
    71.95
     6.63
    30.74
    20.87

     1.00
     6.54
     6.54
     6.54
     0.00

     2.00
    39.27
    71.65
    80.46
    12.46

     1.00
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.00

     3.00
    65.93
    11.76
    36.67
    27.34

     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0

     4.00
    25.00
     0.0.
    13.04
    11.49
Cl

 3.00
31.03
 0.0
15.90
15.53

20.00
97.67
 7.70
63.92
28.48

 6.00
42.86
 3.33
25.45
17.18

 j.OO
98.2]
 0.0
59.94
40.41

 6.00
93.52
33.76
63.70
24.52

 4.00
54.29
 0.0
13.57
27.14

13.00
94.60
14.49
67.61
24.76

 2.00
49.15
43.42
46.29
 4.05

 7.00
87.50
12.50
56.09
28.97
                                                                                                        OTHER C
 7.00
94.22
 0.0
46.57
32.71

19.00
97.73
10.00
65.82
24.86

14.00
93.46
 0.0
44.88
34.30

 6.00
86.57
 0.0
18.59
34.77

 3.00
83.33
38.24
58.12
23.02

10.00
75.00
 0.0
14.42
30.44

 2.00
72.16
23.91
48.04
34.12

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

 1.00
66.67
66.67
66.67
 0.00
                                                                   5/23/75
MISC(D,J)

    3.00
   97.87
    0.0
   55.54
   50.26

    8.00
   97.67
   17.91
   81.41
   27.37

    6.00
   90.91
   22.47
   54.12
   26.13

    4.00
   93.90
    0.0
   28.74
   44.56

    1.00
   88.85
   88.85
   88.85
    0.00

    3.00
    0*0
    0.6
    0.0
 •*»••*•

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

-------
 REPORT NO.*
NOTE: NEGATIVE REMOVALS  DELETED
HOTW KEMOVAL OATA ANALYSIS BY PLANT
                                              PAbE  5
(PARAMETERS CATfGOHY
01030
DISSOLVED



0104P
DISSOLVED



0106«5
DISSOLVED



01025
DISSOLVED



01056
& DISSOLVED
NJ
O

71890
DISSOLVED



70507
PHOSPHATE



0069#




CHKOMIUM,
MG/L AS CR



LEAD.
MG/L AS PB



NICKEL,
MG/L AS ML



CADMIUM,
MG/L AS CD



MANGANESE,
MG/L AS MN



MERCURY,
MG/L: AS HG



TOT ORTHO-
MG/L



TOT CARBON
MG/L AS C



NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
5TO.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTU
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
Al
28.00
80.65
0.0
15.59
32.9?
31.00
66.67
0.0
10.^2
21.81
29.00
50,00
0.0
4.0^
12.56
31.00
25.00
0.0
(1.81
4.<»9
18.00
21.43
0.0
5.65
7.U
20.00
84.21
0.0
21.28
26.16
22.00
82.93
0.0
27.12
20.71
26.00
57.01
0.0
22.29
18.05
                                               OTHER  A

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   1.00
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.00

                                                   1.00
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.00

                                                   1.00
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.00

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0
                                                   0.0

                                                   1.00
                                                   5.97
                                                   5.97
                                                   5.97
                                                   0.00
      Bl

       6.00
      50.00
       0.0
       8.33
      20.41

       6.00
      90.00
       0.0
      33.06
      40.69

       6.00
       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
       6.00
       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
       5.00
      35.71
       0.0
      12.14
      17.05

       2.00
      50.00
      22.22
      36.11
      19.64

       4.00
      25.42
       9.09
      16.15
       6.82

       5.00
      83.80
      52.09
      68.35
      12.71
OTHER B

     4.0U
    88.69
     0.0
    34.72
    43.12

     4.00
    50.00
     0.0
    12.50
    25.00

     4.00
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     4.00
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     4.00
    26.67
     0.0
    12.51
    11.13

     2.00
    50.00
     0.0
    25.00
    35.36

     5.00
    70.83
    12.14
    32.61
    23.77

     4.00
    64.44
    42.22
    50.60
     9". 87
Cl

 9.00
65.67
 0.0
22.61
28.92

 9.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
                                                                                                        OTHtH  C
 9.00
55.56
 0.0
12.23
24.28

 9.00
57.14
 0.0
11.90
23.69

 5.00
92.86
 0.0
34.57
37.57

 7.00
14.29
 0.0
 2.04
 5.40

 8.00
63.64
 2.33
38.43
22.45

 4.00
61.33
34.02
52.29
12.76
 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

 1.00
71.43
71.43
71.43
 0.00

 1.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.00

 1.00
99.05
99.05
99.05
 0.00

 1.00
90.16
90.16
90.16
 0.00
                                                 5/23/75
MISC(D.J)

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    o.o
    0.0
    o.o

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

-------
   PEPORT NO."5
  NOTE: NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETED
POTW REMOVAL DATA ANALYSIS BY PLANT
                                              PAGE  6
(PARAMETERS CATEGORY
00650
PHOSPHATE



00671
TOTAL
MG/L



DISSOLVED
ORTHOPHOSPHATE MG/L



01037




010P7







COBALT»TOT
UG/L AS CO



BARIUM.TOT
UG/L AS BA



NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.UEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.UEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STU.UEV
Al
12.00
46.55
1.56
21.52
13.24
2.00
20.00
7.99
13.95
8.56
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
                                                 OTHER A

                                                     i.oo
                                                    26.87
                                                    26.87
                                                    ?6.87
                                                     0.00

                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0

                                                     2.00
                                                    60.00
                                                     0.0
                                                    30.00
                                                    42.43

                                                     u.u
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     o.o
                                                     0.0
      61

       5.00
      53.57
       1.35
      29.96
      22.23

       3.00
      50i59
       2.17
      24.13
      24.5?

       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
       0.0

       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
       0.0
OTHER rt

     6.00
    69.33
     0.0
    25.47
    25.01

     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0

     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0
     0.0

     1.00
    54.55
    54.55
    54.55
     0.00
Cl

 7.00
63.16
16.98
32.54
16.62

 2.00
96.80
84.21
90.51
 8.90

 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 O.C

 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
                                             OTHER C
 1.00
89.52
89.52
89.52
 0.00

 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0

 2.00
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 1.00
14.71
14.71
14.71
 0.00
                                                 5/23/75
MISC(0,J)

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
01
to

-------
 REPORT NO.6

/PARAMETERS
V
CATEGORY
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW REMOVAL  DATA
                                                   TRICKLING
                                                    FILTER
                                                      (B)
ACTIVATED
  SLUDGE
   (C)
3IOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (8*C)
      PAGE  1

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          6/ 6/75

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 
-------
   REPORT  NO.6

  /PARAMETER'S
  V
CATEGORY
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW REMOVAL  DATA
                              TRICKLING
                               FILTER
                                  IB)
               ACTIVATED
                 SLUD6E
               BIOLOGICAL
                 PLANTS
                   (8»C)
                      PAGE   2

                SECONDARY

                  PLANTS
                          6/ 6/75

                TOTAL  ALL  PLANTS

                  AND SS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 30MG/L
     AND GREATER  THAN OB EQUAL TO 85%  REMOVAL  FOR BOTH PAKAMETERS

-------
    REPORT  No.f

  /PARAMETERS
  V
CATEGORY
              PRIMARY

                (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW REMOVAL  DATA
                TRICKLING
                 FILTER
                   (B)
                ACTIVATED
                 SLUDGE
                   (C)
               BIOLOGICAL
                 PLANTS
                   (B + C)
                SECONDARY
                  PLANTS
                         6/ 6/75

               TOTAL ALL PLANTS

                
-------
 REPORT NO.6

/PARAMETERS
V
CATEGORY
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW REMOVAL   DATA
TRICKLING
 FILTER
   (8)
                                               ACTIVATED
                                                SLUDGE
                                                  (C)
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (B+C)
      PAGE

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          6/ 6/75

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 
-------
 REPORT NO.

/PARAMETERS
V
                     CATEGORY
PRIMARY

  (A)
SUMMARY OF C

  TRICKLING
   FILTER
     (B)
REMOVAL  DATA

  ACTIVATED
    SLUDGE
     (0
                                                                                   BIOLOGICAL
                                                                                     PLANTS
                                                                                      (B*C)
      PAOE  5

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          6/ 6/75

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 
0110^
AL



01045
FF



01055
MN



00720
TOTAL


o>
& 3826n




TOT ALUMINUM
UG/L



TOT IRON
UG/L



TOT MANGANESE
UG/L



CYANIDE,
MG/L



MflAS
MG/L



NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
1.0000
10.8696
10.6696
10.6696
0.0000
27.0000
88.8889
0.0
39.6611
22.0123
16.0000
81.2500
0.0
14.6363
20.4798
1.0000
U.O
0.0
0.0
0.0000
4.0000
90.8602
10.6667
34.3356
37.8509
                                                     5.000U
                                                    91.0853
                                                     0.0
                                                    59.4670
                                                    38.7336

                                                    30.0000
                                                    89.8327
                                                     0.0
                                                    49.6736
                                                    25.7745

                                                    21.0000
                                                    71.9512
                                                     0.0
                                                    31.1776
                                                    23.2465

                                                     4.0000
                                                    80.0000
                                                     0.0
                                                    21.6355
                                                    39.0317

                                                     7.0000
                                                    89.2733
                                                    35.4305
                                                    66.1342
                                                    21.1108
                                                                     9.0000
                                                                    80.7692
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    31.0498
                                                                    25.7011

                                                                    35.0000
                                                                    97.6744
                                                                     7.6965
                                                                    63.0609
                                                                    27.0891

                                                                    19.0000
                                                                    93.4641
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    38.0421
                                                                    31.5947

                                                                    10.0000
                                                                    98.2143
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    32.4716
                                                                    40.2475

                                                                     8.0000
                                                                    93.5233
                                                                    33.7553
                                                                    59.1519
                                                                    22.7038
                                                 14.0000
                                                 91.0853
                                                  0.0
                                                 41.1988
                                                 32.6770

                                                 65.0000
                                                 97.6744
                                                  0.0
                                                 56.8822
                                                 27.1318

                                                 40.0000
                                                 93.4641
                                                  0.0
                                                 34.4382
                                                 27.3842

                                                 14.0000
                                                 98.2143
                                                  0.0
                                                 29.3755
                                                 38.7146

                                                 15.0000
                                                 93.5233
                                                 33.7553
                                                 62.4103
                                                 21.4882
  5.0000
 80.7692
  0.0
 36.3607
 30.7257

 15.0000
 97.6744
 37.5000
 79.3918
 17.1486

 10.0000
 93.4641
 13.8462
 47.1870
 30.3930

  5.0000
 98.2143
  0.0
 48.8868
 41.0122

  2.0000
 91.5385
 50.0000
 70.7692
 29.3719
 20.0000
 97.8723
  0.0
 42.4248
 36.2361

107.0000
 97.7340
  0.0
 54.4198
 27.9096

 66.0000
 93.4641
  0.0
 31.2223
 27.?164

 22.0000
 98.2143
  0.0
 30.8839
 38.9021

 21.0000
 93.5233
 10.6667
 59.3179
 27.2496
NOTE* i
1) NEGATIVE KEMOVALS DELETED
2) PRIMARY (A)  INCLUDES A01.A02
3) TRICKLING FILTER (B) INCLUDES B01 ,802,804,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE 
-------
   REPORT  NO.6

  /PARAMETERS
  V
                     CATEGORY
            PRIMARY

               (A)
                                                 SUMMARY OF POTW REMOVAL  DATA
                                                   TRICKLING
                                                    FILTER
                                                      (B)
               ACTIVATED
                 SLUD6E
                   (C)
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   
   01032      HEXAVALENT
   CHROMIUM,  UG/L  AS CR
   00605      NITROGEN,
   ORGANIC          MG/L
   00666      DISSOLVED
   PHOSPHORUS      MG/L
   01040      COPPER,
   DISSOLVED  MG/L  AS  Cu
-J 01090      ZINC,
  DISSOLVED  MG/L  AS  ZN
  01030     CHROMIUM,
  DISSOLVED MG/L AS CR
  01049     LEAD,
  DISSOLVED MG/L *S PB
NO.POTW
  MAX
  MIN
 MEAN
ST0.0EV

NO.POTW
  MAX
  MIN
 MEAN
STO.OEV

NO.POTW
  MAX
  MIN
 MEAN
STQ,flEV

NO.POTW
  MAX
  MIN
 MEAN
STD.BEV

NO.POTW
  MAX
  MIN
 MEAN
STD.BEV

NO.POTW
  MAX
  •MU*
 MEAN
STO.BEV

NO.POTW
  MAX
                      STD.PEV
    3.0000
    0.0
    0.0
    0*0
*«***««*«*

   10.0000
   69.2308
    1*1696
   39.7083
   23.5323

    1.0000
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0000

   23.0000
   65.0000
    0.0
   18.7356
   17.0688

   21.0000
   71*4286
    0.0
   25.3454
   18.1713

   28.0000
   80.6452
    0.0
   15,5886
   22.9236

   31.0000
   66*6667
    0.0
   10.2150
   21*8061
 6.0000
60.0000
 0.0
24.5454
29.4242

 8.0000
75.0000
 0.0
47.6869
25.4775

 1.0000
14.8148
14.8148
14.8148
 0.0000

10.0000
62.5000
 0.0
27.5574
22.2836

 7.0000
60.0000
 0.0
39.9350
20.9625

10.0000
88.8889
 0.0
18.8889
32.2030

10.0000
90.0000
 0.0
24.8333
35.2281
                                                                    13.0000
                                                                    75.0000
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    15.2705
                                                                    29.3448

                                                                    15.0000
                                                                    94.6000
                                                                    14.4928
                                                                    65.0046
                                                                    25.6135

                                                                     3.0000
                                                                    49.1525
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    30.8578
                                                                    26.8769

                                                                     8.0000
                                                                    87.5060
                                                                    12.5000
                                                                    57.4091
                                                                    27.0812

                                                                     7.0000
                                                                    87.5000
                                                                    14.2857
                                                                    S3.64S2
                                                                    31.8898

                                                                    10.0000
                                                                    65.6716
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    20.3526
                                                                    28.1859

                                                                    10.0000
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     0.0
                                                                 «»••«»*••»
 19.0000
 75.0000
  0.0
 18.1994
 28.8824

 23.0000
 94.6000
  0.0
 58.9810
 26.3655

  4.0000
 49.1525
  0.0
 26.8471
 23.3650

 18.0000
 87.5000
  0.0
 40.8248
 28.2462

 14.0000
 87.5000
  0.0  .
 46.7916
 26.8851

 20.0000
 88.8889
  0.0
 19.6207
 29.4636

 20.0000
 90.0000
  0.0
 12.4167
 27.3886
    5.0000
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
«»«**»««*«

    5.0000
   94.6000
   58.9743
   80.9077
   15.0376

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    6.0000
   87.5000
   25.0000
   65.3521
   22.0187

    4.0000
   87.5000
   45.4545
   69.9053
   20.7082

    6.0000
   88.8889
    0.0
   33.4046
   38.7118

    6.0000
   50.0000
    0.0
   13.8889
   22.1527
 27.0000
 75.0000
  0.0
 12.8070
 25.4801

 34.0000
 94.6000
  0.0
 51.9238
 27.2627

  5.0000
 49.1525
  0.0
 21.4777
 23.5286

 42.0000
 87.5000
  0.0
 28.4778
 24.6455

 36.0000
 87.5000
  0.0
 33.1986
 24.2174

 48.0000
 86.8889
  0.0
 17.2687
 25.6291

 52.0000
 90.0000
  0.0
 10.8654
 23.7211
NOTE1?:
1) NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETtD
2) PRIMARY (A) INCLUDES A01.A02
3) TRICKLING FILTER  (8) INCLUDES B01,802.804,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE  (C) INCLUDES C01,C02,C05.C06,C09,C19,C20
5) SFCONDARY PLANTS ARE THOSE BIOLOGICAL PLANTS WITH  EFFLUENT  SOD-s  AND  SS  LESS  THAN  OR  EQUAL  TO  30MG/L
   A.ND GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 85% REMOVAL FOR BOTH  PAKAMETERS

-------
 REPORT  NO.6

/PARAMETERS
V
CATEGORY
..*...**»
PRIMARY
                             SUMMARY  Of  POTW REMOVAL   DATA
TRICKLING
 FILTER
   (B)
ACTIVATED
  SLUDGE
   (C)
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (B*C)
      PAGE  7

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          6/ 6/75

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 (A»B*C*OTHER)
01065 NICKELt
DISSOLVED MG/L AS NI



01025 CADMIUM,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS CD



01056 MANGANESE,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS MM



7i89o MERCURY,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS HG


®
r
oo 70507 TOT ORTHO-
PHOSPHATE MG/L



00690 TOT CARBON
MG/L AS C



NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
-WIN
Mi AN
STD.BEV
29.0000
50.0000
0.0
4.0887
12.5805
31.0000
25.0000
0.0
0.8065
4.4901
18.0000
21.4286
0.0
5.6515
7.1377
20.0000
84,2105
0.0
21.2799
26.1570
22.0000
82.9268
0.0
27.1162
20.7055
26.0000
57.0111
0.0
23*2897
18.0518
10.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
**********
10.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
*•*«****»*
9.0000
35.7143
0.0
12.3064
13.8533
4.0000
50.0000
0.0
30.5555
24.2161
9.0000
70.8333
9.0909
25.2945
19.3681
9.0000
83,7956
42.2222
60.4625
14.3129
                                                                    10.0000
                                                                    55.5555
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    11.0191
                                                                    23.2125,

                                                                    10.0000
                                                                    57.1429
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    10.7143
                                                                    22.6503

                                                                     6.0000
                                                                    92.8571
                                                                     0.0
                                                                    40.7143
                                                                    36.8200

                                                                     8.0000
                                                                    14.2857
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     1.7857
                                                                     5.0508

                                                                     9.0000
                                                                    99.0476
                                                                     2.3256
                                                                    45.1609
                                                                    29.1433

                                                                     5.0000
                                                                    90.1639
                                                                    34.0296
                                                                    59.8665
                                                                    20.2218
                                                                20.0000
                                                                55.5555
                                                                 0.0
                                                                 5.5050
                                                                16.9450

                                                                20..0000
                                                                57.1429
                                                                 0.0
                                                                 5.3571
                                                                16.5296

                                                                15.0000
                                                                92.8571
                                                                 0.0
                                                                23.6695
                                                                28.3084

                                                                12.0000
                                                                50.0000
                                                                 0.0
                                                                11.3757
                                                                19.4119

                                                                18.0000
                                                                99.0476
                                                                 2.3256
                                                                35.2277
                                                                26.0900

                                                                14.0000
                                                                90.1639
                                                                34.0206
                                                                60.2496
                                                                15.8738
                                                                  6.0000
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  0.0
                                                              *«*«*»*«*»

                                                                  6.0000
                                                                 50.0000
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  8.3333
                                                                 20.4124

                                                                  4.0000
                                                                 92.8571
                                                                 20.0000
                                                                 47.3810
                                                                 32.9329

                                                                  3.0000
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  0.0
                                                              •*««»**»«*

                                                                  4.0000
                                                                 58.3333
                                                                 40.0000
                                                                 47.2083
                                                                  8.1347

                                                                  4.0000
                                                                 64.5833
                                                                 60.7843
                                                                 62.7863
                                                                  2.0065
                                                                 50.0000
                                                                 55.5555
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  4.5734
                                                                 14.2371

                                                                 52.0000
                                                                 57.1429
                                                                  0.0
                                                                  2.5412
                                                                 10.8957

                                                                 33.0000
                                                                 92.8571
                                                                  0.0
                                                                 13.8415
                                                                 21.4632

                                                                 32.0000
                                                                 84.2105
                                                                  0.0
                                                                 17.5658
                                                                 24.0163

                                                                 40.0000
                                                                 99.0476
                                                                  0.0
                                                                 30.7663
                                                                 23.3294

                                                                 41.0000
                                                                 90.1639
                                                                  0.0
                                                                 34.8535
                                                                 25.1943
NOTE*; l
1) NEGATIVE HEMOVALS DELETtO
2) PRIMARY <«> INCLUDES A01.A02
3) TRICKLING FILTER (B) INCLUDES B01,802,804,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE 
-------
    REPORT NQ.fi

  /PARAMETERS
  V
CATEGORY
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY  OF  POTW  REMOVAL   DATA
                              TRICKLING
                               FILTER
                                  (B)
ACTIVATED
  SLU06E
   (C)
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (B*C)
      PAGE  8

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          6/ 6/75

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 (A*B+C»OTHER)
i
to
00650
PHOSPHATE



00671
TOTAL
MG/L



DISSOLVED
ORTHOPHOSPHATE MG/L



01037




01007







COBALT, TOT
UG/L AS CO



BARIUM, TOT
UG/L AS BA



NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.porw
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
13.0000
46.5517
1.5625
21.9399
12.7638
2.0000
20.0000
7.8947
13.9474
8.5597
2.0000
60.0000
0.0
30.0000
42.4264
1.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0000
                                                       11.0000
                                                       69.3333
                                                       0.0
                                                       27.5111
                                                       22.7160

                                                       3.0000
                                                       50.588?
                                                       2.1739
                                                       24.1350
                                                       24.5178

                                                       0.0
                                                       0.0
                                                       0.0
                                                       0.0
                                                       0.0

                                                       1.0000
                                                       54.5455
                                                       54.5455
                                                       54.5455
                                                       0.0000
                                                8.0000
                                               89.5238
                                               16.9811
                                               39.6647
                                               25.3521

                                                2.0000
                                               96.8000
                                               84.2105
                                               90.5053
                                                8.9022

                                                2.0000
                                                0.0
                                                0.0
                                                0.0
                                            »«*««****»

                                                1.0000
                                               14.7059
                                               14.7059
                                               14.7059
                                                0.0000
                                                  19.0000
                                                  89.5238
                                                  0.0
                                                  32.6284
                                                  23.9716

                                                  5.0000
                                                  96.8000
                                                  2.1739
                                                  50.6831
                                                  40.5201

                                                  2.0000
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  2.0000
                                                 54.5455
                                                 14.7059
                                                 34.6257
                                                 28.1708
                                  o.o
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0

                                  ?.oooo
                                 96.8000
                                 84.2105
                                 90.5053
                                  8.9027

                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0

                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                 32.0000
                                 89.5238
                                  0.0
                                 28.2821
                                 20.6210

                                  7.0000
                                 96.8000
                                  2.1739
                                 40.1871
                                 37.7903

                                  4.0000
                                 60.0000
                                  0.0
                                 15.0000
                                 30.0000

                                  3.0000
                                 54.5455
                                  0.0
                                 23.0838
                                 28.2213
   1)  NEGATIVE HEMOVALS DELETtO
   2)  PRIMARY (A)  INCLUDES A01.A02
   3)  TRICKLING FILTER  INCLUDES flOl,802,804,805
   4)  ACTIVATED SLUDGE (C) INCLUDES C01,C02,C05,C06,C09,C19,C20
   5)  SECONDARY PLANTS ARE THOSE BIOLOGICAL PLANTS WITH EFFLUENT tJOD-S AND SS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 30MG/L
      AND GREATER  THAN OR EQUAL TO 85* REMOVAL FOR BOTH PAKAMETERS

-------
REPORT NO. 7
(PARAMETERS
y
00550
TOT-SXLT



00556

CATEGORY

OIL-GREASE




M6/L



OIL-GREASE
SEP-FUNNEL



00560
INFRARED



00500



MG/L



OIL-GREASE




MG/L



RESIDUE
TOTAL. TS



00530
TOT NFLT.
at
i
CJ
o
00310
5DAY



00340
MI LEVEL



00335
LOW- LEVEL






MG/L



RESIDUE
SS



BOD




COD




COD




MG/L




MG/L




MG/L




MG/L



093*? SCfc COO








MO/L




NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.PEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.UEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
•STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
«5N
MEAN
STD.OEV
Al

5.0000
44.0000
19.0000
29.1000
9.8387
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
u.n
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.n
25.0000
1842.0000
346.0000
676.4800
372.0469
49.0000
314.0000
15.0000
90.9428
64.5526
54.0000
650.0000
20.0000
166.3759
111.5490
11.0000
768.0000
58.0000
351.7271
248.0525
1.0000
345.0000
345.0000
345.0000
0.0000
2.0000
514.0000
3Jt5>QOQO
"4^9.5000
119.5031
POTW EFFLUENT DATA ANALYSIS
OTHER A Bl OTHER B

1.0000
21.5000
21.5000
21.5000
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0000
1269.0000
400.0000
684.000U
334.3118
8.0000
161.0000
85.5000
110.5625
25.2321
6.0000
300.0000
51.0000
198.6667
94.6963
6.0000
555.0000
147.0000
292.1665
152.9436
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

5.0000
72.0000
4.0000
25.8000
27.0106
3.0000
9.0000
1.0000
4,1667
4.2525
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.0000
2034.0000
300.0000
697.3809
472.4102
32.0000
228.0000
5.0000
47.2813
44.1930
32.0000
245.0000
8.0000
51.1875
55.8103
15.0000
210.0000
26.0000
109.5667
56.9887
1.0000
66.0000
66.0000
66.0000
0.0000
3.0000
315.0000
102.0000
177.6667
119.1401

6.0000
37.8000
5.0000
17.2000
13.5422
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25.0000
3030.0000
40.0000
666.9678
572.1072
37.0000
196.0000
6.0000
41.4297
38.2320
33.0000
180.0000
2.2000
47.6848
43.2595
15.0000
370.0000
32.0000
176.3333
106.6633
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0000
158.0000
18.0000
95.3333
61.9439
Cl

7.0000
130.0000
6.0000
36.9143
43.5760
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
22.0000
3440.0000
294.0000
741.3635
701.6296
42.0000
175.0000
2.0000
32.4286
31.8795
41.0000
200.0000
3.0000
27.7707
37.4381
20.0000
275.0000
31.7000
109.1250
70.1036
1.0000
24.0000
24.0000
24.0000
0.0000
6.0000
173.0000
16.0000
84.6667
71.4554
PAGE 1
OTHER C

5.0000
58.5000
1.0000
19.5200
24.7896
4.0000
8.0000
1.0000
4.7500
2.8723
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
15.0000
1980.0000
371.0000
716.0000
388.2290
30.0000
185.0000
4.0000
37.9767
45.9761
31.0000
230.0000
2.0000
25.2516
41.5822
13.0000
148.0000
14.3000
55.0231
32.5391
4.0000
51.0000
14.0000
28.7500
15.7982
4.0000
119.0000
29.0000
81.0000
38.6781
5/23/75
MISC(D,J)

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0000
770.0000
630.0000
689.3333
72.3948
9.0000
94.0000
3.0000
20.5555
33.1176
9.0000
131.0000
2.0000
23.20 0
41.8200
5.0000
329.0000
53.0000
139.8000
111.2617
1.0000
28.0000
28.0000
28.0000
0.0000
2.0000
32.0000
28.0000
30.0000
2.8283

-------
REPORT NO. 7
(PARAMETERS CATEGORY
32730
PHENOL I CS
4AAP DISTIL UG/L



00945




00940
CL



0066S



SULFATE
MG/L
'


CHLORIDE
MG/L



TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS MG/L



00630
N02-N03
en
i
w
t->
00610
AMMONIA



00635
KJELDAHL*



0100? TOT
AS



intrzr TOT
CD






NITROGEN.
MG/L



NITROGEN.
MG/L



NITROGEN.
TOTAL MG/L



ARSENIC
UG/L



CftDMIOM
UG/i



NO. POT W
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO»PGTW
MAX
*d*t.
•tfEttr
STD.DEV
Al
4.0000
53.0000
0.1000
13.4750
26.3504
17.0000
150.0000
26.0000
64.1765
32.5311
38.0000
2169.0000
43.0000
313.2419
433.^438
a. oooo
77.0000
1.3400
15.1775
25.1363
2.0000
10.0000
0.0300
5.0150
7.0498
59.0000
256.5999
2.1000
20.7145
35.9821
7.0000
47.0000
a. 5000
23.4286
12.2421
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
2.0000
0.0000
30.0000
40.0000
3.0000
•tavooot)
8.2795
POTW tFFLUENT DATA ANALYSIS
OTHER A
4.0000
45.0000
0.1500
22.2875
19.1841
2.0000
150.0000
72.0000
111.0000
55.1543
6.0000
290.0000
60.0000
123.5000
84.8356
3.0000
10.0000
4.0000
6.0167
3.4498
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.0000
24.5000
4.3000
14.8500
7.1762
1.0000
31.0000
31.0000
31.0000
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.QUUO
480.0000
4.0000
85.2857
174.3509
si
8.0000
3000.0000
0.0300
385.6873
1056.4651
11.0000
243.0000
38.0000
73.7273-
57.5257
18.0000
330,0000
32.0000
112.1667
71.1063
17.0000
18.3000
3.2700
8.7706
3.8594
11.0000
16.0000
0.0260
5.1419
4.9174
33.0000
115.0000
0.0300
18.2281
19.9891
13.0000
39.0000
1.2000
17.3615
11.8365
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
2.0000
0.0000
22.0000
66*0000
1.0000
12.6954
13.7692
OTHER B
7.0000
24.0000
0.0300
6.7671
9.449?
7.0000
454.0000
22.0000
177.4286
189.1868
16.0000
990.0000
36.0000
172.9062
251.3995
13.0000
20.0000
1.6000
9.0685
5.5395
10.0000
23.8000
0.1500
7.7250
7.1650
35.0000
76.0000
0.1300
14.7714
14.0357
10.0000
46.7500
2.2000
14.6340
12.6386
4.0000
20.0000
0.5000
8.3250
8.3679
22.0000
20.0000
l.QOOO
9.7273
5.1193
Cl
9.0000
2000.0000
0.0200
226.4699
665.1030
14.0000
223.0000
33.0000
88.7857
68.8778
22.0000
1561.0000
43.0000
256.4497
342.6404
23.0000
10.4000
1.0000
4.1930
2.3527
11.0000
7.8000
0.0200
1.7973
2.6517
41.0000
26.0000
0.2000
11.4107
7.2425
11.0000
34.0000
1.5000
18.7809
10.0763
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
2.0000
0.0000
23.0000
20.0000
1.0000
11.2609
6.4893
PAGt 2
OTHER C
11.0000
353.0000
0.0400
35.6400
105.2899
15.0000
470.0000
17.0000
134.6000
102.7121
17.0000
610.0000
43.8000
210,1647
175.1463
23.0000
10.3000
0.4600
5.4317
3.1812
17.0000
19.9000
0.0300
5.2485
6.2322
31.0000
27.5000
0.0700
9.5529
8.0652
8.0000
26.2500
1.6000
10.2437
9.3281
7.0000
5.0000
2.0000
3.7143
1.6036
33.0000
1970.0000
2.0000
69.4151
341.2322
5/23/75
MISCJDjj)
5.0000
30000.0000
2.0000
6003.1992
13414.5742
3.0000
400.0000
136.0000
254.6667
134.0049
4.0000
410.0000
148.0000
274.5000
109.8527
6.0000
8.7800
2.7000
5.9600
2.4041
3.0000
13.0000
0.6300
8.1100
6.5791
8.0000
17.8000
0.1200
5.3950
6.4845
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0000
35.0000
1.0000
10.6667
12.2583

-------
 RFPORT NO.7

IPAH4METERS
V
01034 TOT CHROMIUM
CR              UG/L
01051 TOT LEAD
PR
                UG/L
71900 TOT MERCURY
HG              UG/L
      TOT COPPER
Cu
                UG/L
01097 TOT ANTIMONY
                UG/L
01067 TOT NICKEL
NI              UG/L
01147 TOT SFLENTUM
                UG/L
01077 TOT SILVER
AG              UG/L
0109? TOT ZINC
ZN              UG/L

CATEGORY
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.UEV
NO.POTw
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV

Al
36.0000
2600.0000
6.0000
190.3055
442.4038
30.0000
1700.0000
10.0000
157.7667
297.8857
21.0000
1.6000
0.1000
0.6000
0.3834
42.0000
1700.0000
10.0000
199.3333
?96.(>693
U.O
0.0
0.0
U.O
0.0
27.0000
300.0000
6.0000
69.7407
58.6708
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
1.0000
13.0000
13.0000
13.0000
0.0000
42.0000
3600,0000
30.0000
582.4045
703.7622
f
OTHER A
9.0000
350.0000
14.0000
168.6667
99.2658
9.0000
386.0000
29.0000
132.2222
112.0921
3.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
0.0062
7.0000
360.0000
40.0000
168.5714
110.3505
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.0000
170Q.OOOO
18.0000
594.0000
749.7041
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
,0.0
b-.o
0.0
8.0000
680.0000
132.0000
355.2500
152.9484
3OTW EFFLUENT [
Bl
29.0000
3200.0000
9.0000
327.6206
733.R914
23.0000
550.0000
5.0000
94.2174
144.7010
11.0000
1.8750
0.1000
0.5341
0.4897
32.0000
1800.0000
2.6000
155.4562
334.9673
o.n
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.fi
22.UOOO
1130,0000
11.0000
178.1227
292.4619
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0000
445.7000
445.7000
445.7000
0.0000
33.0000
2800. .0000
40.0000
347.9695
552.8789
)ATA ANALYSIS
OTHER B
28.0000
1200.0000
3.0000
132.5357
?62.0610
25.0000
1800.0000
9.0000
133.4400
355.7373
14.0000
10.0000
0.2000
1 .2439
2.5438
25.0000
1000.0000
19.0000
99.0400
193.3092
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
21.0000
1533.0000
7.0000
197.5238
365.1274
1.0000
5,0000
5.0000
5.0000
0,0000
2.0000
10.0000
2.0000
6.0000
5.6568
30.0000
1321.00-00
20.0000
254.5667
319.8511

Cl
32.0000
2520.0000
5.0000
323.7717
687.3762
30.0000
350.0000
3.0000
74.2900
76.1513
22.0000
200.0000
0.1000
9.8091
42.4839
40.0000
1600.0000
10.0000
105.7500
254.8947
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
32.0000
1800.0000
3.0000
110.9562
309.5474
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
2.0000
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0000
1400. OOOC
10.0000
258.8823
301.3843
PAGE 3
OTHER C
36.0000
400.0000
5.0000
57.1583
90.6973
30.0000
200.0000
4.0000
51.7767
49.1337
20.0000
5.0000
0.2000
0.6115
1.0692
37.0000
180.0000
6.0000
62.6027
51.1277
1.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
0.0000
32.0000
40000.0000
7.0000
1332.0625
7056.5898
3.0000
5.0000
2.0000
4.0000
1.7321
1.0000
10.0000
10.0000
10.0000
0.0000
37.0000
800.0000
30.0000
188.1702
166.0566
5/23/75
MISC(D.J)
7.0000
600.0000
10.0000
110.1429
216.5660
8.0000
50.0000
12.0000
31.0000
10.9021
5.0000
1.7000
0.2000
0.5400
0.6542
7.0000
152.0000
6.0000
32.1429
53.0831
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0000
240.0000
5.0000
67.3333
86.6525
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0000
338.0000
9.0000
123.3333
151.6491

-------
REPORT NO. 7
POtW EFFLukyr DATA ANALYSIS
(PARAMETERS CATEGORY
01102 TOT TIN
U6/L



00680 TOT ORG CARBON
TOTALtTOC MG/L



00410 ALKALINITY
PH 4.5 MG/L



00400 PH
SU



00095 SPECIFIC
CONDUCTANCE MICROMHQ



01105 TOT ALUMINUM
Al UG/L



OTW5 TOT IRON
FE UG/L



tTJ 055 TOT 1WN6ANESE
MN UG/L



^OlWp CHtORlNE.
TOT RESIDUAL MG/L



NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
ME*N
STO.DEV
Al
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.0000
539.0000
52.0000
141.1211
86.5486
6.0000
300.0000
83.0000
186.5000
79.1495
54.0000
8.2000
5.0000
7.0539
0.4973
3.0000
970.0000
615.0000
828.3333
188.0360
1.0000
410.0000
410.0000
410.0000
0.0000
23.0000
3500.0000
400.0000
1344.3042
847.8044
16.0000
362.0000
30.0000
147.9375
102.7452
26.0000
10,0000
0.2000
1.9558
1.9374
OTHER A
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.0000
228.0000
128.0000
177.0000
40.8733
4.0000
258.0000
18.5000
134.8750
99.7165
8.0000
7.9000
5.6000
6.9125
0.7434
3.0000
600.0000
500.0000
550.0000
49.9959
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.0000
5000.0000
620.0000
2083.7500
1287.4473
6.0000
390.0000
66.0000
250.3333
107.4531
2.0000
3.0000
0.1000
1.5500
2.0506
HI
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.0000
96.0000
33.0000
54.2500
22.9705
10.0000
319.0000
133.0000
203.3500
63.8173
36.0000
7.9000
6.6000
7.2822
0.3627
10.0000
1475.0000
634.0000
942.5000
314. 5) 03
4.0000
1450.0000
100.0000
735.0000
553.0823
18.0000
10000.0000
100.0000
1331.7222
2225.0439
12.0000
329.0000
40.0000
120.5833
89.0601
8.0000
3.0000
0.1000
1.8775
1.1025
OTHER 8
1.0000
400.0000
400.0000
400.0000
0.0000
"16.0000
129'. 0000
iX.oooo
51\8687
29.^061
13.0&QO
344.06IJO
41.0000
162.230%
104.3436
33.0000
8.00\0
4.000\
7.0836
0.7608
7.0000
4400.0000
669.0000
1455.5713
1328.3367
2.0000
100.0000
20.0000
60.0000
56.5685
17.0000
65550.0000
110.0000
4572.0586
15725.2813
17.0000
580.0000
20.0000
148.8235
150.6980
12.0000
3.0000
0..1000
2.0558
0.8526
Cl
1.0000
12600.0000
12600.0000
12600.0000
0.0000
9.0000
95.0000
11.0000
41.8555
25.2905
10JOOOO
400,0000
117.0000
244.6000
107.7918
36.0000
8.0000
6.2000
7.1997
0.4258
8.0000
1900.0000
791.0000
1208.0000
382.5190
3.0000
2^0.0000
100.0000
166.6667
57.7348
20.0000
6800.0000
10.0.0000
94\ . 0498
1527.0234
7,0000
443.0000
20.0000
141.2857
143.2210
10.0000
3.0000
0.6000
1.5090
0.7272
PAGE 4
OTHER C
4.0000
400.0000
400.0000
400.0000
0.0
8.0000
35.0000
10.0000
22.5000
7.2702
15.0000
384.0000
78.0000
238.2000
80.6967
24.0000
8.3000
6.3000
7.2937
0.4908
18.0000
3170.0000
760.0000
1446.9443
672.5767
9.0000
570.0000
100.0000
211.1111
148.5298
21.0000
1550.0000
100.0000
482.2856
424.9780
18.0000
940.0000
10.0000
147.4444
212.7679
13.0000
3.0000
0.0700
1.1385
0.8896
5>
MISCI
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0000
102.0000
34.0000
68.0000
48.0831
4.0000
317.0000
135.0000
264.0000
86.4283
9.0000
7.9000
7.0000
7.4778
0.3031
3*0000
2500.0000
1820.0000
2106.6665
352.3655
3.0000
200.0000
100*0000
133.3333
57.7349
8.0000
1100.0000
35.0000
267.3750
349.1960
6.0000
138.0000
12.0000
51.5000
46.2504
3.0000
1.1000
0.2500
0.6500
0.4272
5/23/75

-------
REPORT NO. 7
(PARAMETERS
00720 CYANIDE,
TOTAL MG/L



38260 MBAS
MG/L



00620 NITROGEN,
NITRATE MG/L



01032 HEXAVALENT
CHROMIUM, UG/L AS CR



00615 NITROGEN,
NITRITE MG/L



00605 NITROGEN,
ORGANIC MG/L



00666 DISSOLVED
PHOSPHORUS MG/L



flfWT COPPER.
0JSSOLVED MG/L AS CU




CATEGORY
NO.PQTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.P0TW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO, POTW
MAX
HI*
MEAN
STD.DEV

Al
2.0000
0,1700
0.0200
0.0950
0.1061
4.0000
17.8000
0.4250
7.3087
7.3937
38.0000
6.5000
0.0100
1.0715
1.1678
3.0000
25.0000
5.0000
lb.6667
10.4084
37,0000
0.6900
0.0240
0.1649
0.1255
12,0000
22*0000
4.0000
10.8833
6.5013
2.0000
5,4000
4.3000
4.8500
0.7778
32.0000
11.7000
0.0600
0.5005
2.0460
            POTW EFFLUENT DATA ANALYSIS
OTHER A
    3.0000
    0.0600
    0,0100
    0.0400
    0.0265

    2.0000
    3.8000
    1.0000
    2.4000
    1.9799

    4.0000
    2.1000
    0.4000
    1.0000
    0.7517

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    5.0000
    0.2300
    0.0130
    0.1406
    0.0837

    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    0.0
    0>0
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0

    1.0000
    0*6900
    0.6900
    0.6900
    0.0000
 Bl

 5.0000
 0.0160
 0.0030
 0.0082
 0.0051

 5.0000
 3.2800
 0.5700
 1.8020
 1.0141

15.0000
 8.6000
 0.1200
 2.0527
 2.4417

 5.0000
20.0000
 2.0000
10.6000
 7.4699

14.0000
 0.2940
 0.0040
 0.1601
 0.0984

 6.0000
11.8000
 3.0000
 6.9833
 3.7107

 2.0000
 3.2000
 2.3000
 2.7500
 0.6364

 6.0000
 0.1300
 0.0300
 0.0733
 0.0476.
OTHER B

   3.0000
 100.0000
   0.0030
  33.3373
  57.7316

   4.0000
   2.6800
   0.6200
   1.6075
   0.9892

  18.0000
  11.3800
   0.1400
   2.2439
   2.7327

   2.0000
 100.0000
  10.0000
  55.0000
  63.6396

  19.0000
   2.0000
   0.0100
   0.3411
   0.5201

   3.0000
  15.0000
   4.4000
   8.0000
   6.0630

   2.0000
   8.4000
   4.0000
   6.2000
   3.1113

   4.0000
   0.1300
   0.0400
   0.0725
   0.0395
   Cl

10.0000
 0.1060
 0.0020
 0.0275
 0.0364

 6.0000
 3.2900
 0.2000
 1.2283
 1.2468

22.0000
 8.0000
 0.0500
 1.9377
 2.2021

 4.0000
16.0000
10.0000
11.5000
 3.0000

16.0000
 0.6000
 0.0170
 0.1404
 0.1371

13.0000
24.5000
 0.4000
 5.0308
 6.3547

 5.0000
 8.0000
 3.0000
 4.6600
 1.9308

 9.0000
 1.4000
 0.0100
 0.2522
 0.4678
 PAGE  5

OTH^R C

  12.X1000
   2.2600
   0.0050
   0.2101
   0.6466

   3.0000
   1.7000
   0.2100
   0.7700
   0.8110

   a.oooo
   7.9900
   0.0200
   1.6450
   2.6992

  11.0000
  60.0000
  10.0000
  18.6364
  16.7467

   8,0000
   8.2450
   0.0100
   1.2786
   2.8546

   3.0000
  15.1000
   2.7000
   7.1000
   6.9397

   3.0000
   4.8000
   1.8000
   3.2000
   1.5100

   1.0000
   0.0300
   0,0300
   0.0300
   0.0000
     5/23/75

  MISC(D.J)

 5.0000
 0.0300
 0.0050
 0.0138
 0.0122

 1.0000
 0.2900
 0.2900
 0.2900
 0.0000

 1.0000
 2.2000
 2.2000
 2.2000
 0.0000

 3.0000
10.0000
 2,0000
 7.3333
 4.6188

 1.0000
 0,1300
 0,1300
 0.1300
 0.0000

 0.0
 0.0
 0,0
 0.0
 0.0

 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0

 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0

-------
REPORT NO.7
                                                          POTW tFFLUENT DATA ANALYSIS
(PARAMETERS CATEGORY
v 	 	 _„.
01090
DISSOLVED



01030
DISSOLVED



01049
DISSOLVED



01065
DISSOLVED



01025
DISSOLVED
o>
Ul
01
01056
DISSOLVED



71890
DISSOLVED



70507
PHOSPHATE



00690




ZINC,
MG/L AS ZN



CHROMIUM,
MG/L AS CR



LEAD,
MG/L AS PB



NICKEL,
MG/L AS NI



CADMIUM,
MG/L AS CO



MANGANESE,
MG/L AS MN



MERCURY,
MG/L AS HG



TOT ORTHO-
MG/L



TOT CARBON
MG/L AS C



NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
CEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.UEV
NO. POT to
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
Al
26
3
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
3J
7
0
3
1
28
580
88
180
95

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
«
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
ft
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

oooo
2500
0400
3941
6701
0000
5600
0100
0723
1197
0000
2000
1000
1097
0301
0000
3200
1000
1313
1330
0000
0300
0100
0124
0062
0000
3600
0005
1578
0796
0000
0017
0001
0005
0004
0000
7000
7000
2524
6278
0000
0000
0000
6964
0198
OTHER
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
8
3
5
3
2
252
225
238
19
A
.0000
.5900
.5900
.5900
.0000
.0000
.0700
.0700
.0700
.0000
.0000
.3000
.3000
.3000
.0000
.0000
.1000
.1000
.1000
.0000
.0000
.0200
.0200
.0200
.0000
.0000
.2400
.2400
.2400
.0000
.0000
.0023
.0023
.0023
.0000
.0000
.0000
.7000
.8500
.0405
.0000
.0000
.0000
.5000
.0903
HI
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
0.
0.
0.
b.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.
3.
0.
2.
0.
5.
111.
50.
76.
OTHER B
0000
0700
0600
0650
0058
0000
0100
0100
0100
0000
0000
1000
0200
OB67
0327
0000
1000
1000
1000
0001
0000
0100
0100
0100
0000
0000
1100
0300
0667
0301
0000
0009
0001
0006
0003
0000
6000
7000
5143
9907
0000
0000
0000
8000
28.5778
3
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
13
13
1
6
3
5
160
52
86
43
.0000
.1000
.0500
.0700
.0265
.0000
.0100
.0100
.0100
.0
.0000
.1000
.1000
.1000
.0001
.0000
.1000
.1000
.1.000
.0001
.0000
.0100
.0100
.0100
.0
.0000
.1100
• 0600
.0850
.0238
.0000
.0018
.0003
.0008
.0007
.0000
.0000
.7500
.7808
.9475
.0000
.0000
.0000
.2000
.8315
                                                                                              Cl

                                                                                            8.0000
                                                                                            1.1600
                                                                                            0.0100
                                                                                            0.2912
                                                                                            0.4621

                                                                                            9.0000
                                                                                            0.7000
                                                                                            0.0100
                                                                                            0.1233
                                                                                            0.2284

                                                                                            9.0000
                                                                                            0.1000
                                                                                            0.1000
                                                                                            0.1000
                                                                                            0.0

                                                                                            9.0000
                                                                                            o.aooo
                                                                                            0.1000
                                                                                            0.1944
                                                                                            0.2324

                                                                                            9.0000
                                                                                            0.1200
                                                                                            0.0100
                                                                                            0.0222
                                                                                            0.0367

                                                                                            9.0000
                                                                                            0.2600
                                                                                            0.0200
                                                                                            0.1244
                                                                                            0.0838

                                                                                            8.0000
                                                                                            0.0008
                                                                                            0.0001
                                                                                            0.0005
                                                                                            0.0002

                                                                                            9.0000
                                                                                           28.0000
                                                                                            1.0000
                                                                                            4.6778
                                                                                            8.7695

                                                                                            5.0000
                                                                                           90.0000
                                                                                           40.0000
                                                                                           62.8000
                                                                                           17.9218
 PAGt  6

OTHER C

   1.0000
   0.0800
   0.0800
   0.0800
   0.0000

   1.0000
   0.0100
   0.0100
   0.0100
   0.0000

   1.0000
   0.1000
   0.1000
   0.1000
   0.0000

   1.0000
   0.1000
   0.1000
   0.1000
   0.0000

   1.0000
   0.0100
   0.0100
   0.0100
   0.0000

   1.0000
   0.0200
   0.0200
   0.0200
   0.0000

   1.0000
   0.0010
   0.0010
   0.0010
   0.0000

   <».oooo
  18.0000
   0.1000
   7.6750
   8.0653

   1.0000
  24.0000
  24.0000
  24.0000
   0.0000
    5/23/75

 MISC(D.J)

0.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
OtO
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
o.o

0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

-------
KC.HON 1 NO. 7
POTW EFFLUENT DATA ANALYSIS
•PARAMETERS CATEGORY
00900 HARDNESS'
TOTAL MG/L



00425 ALKALINITY
-BICARBONATE MG/L



00650 TOTAL
PHOSPHATE MG/L



00070 TURBIDITY
JTU



00671 DISSOLVED
ORTHOPHOSPHATE MG/L
o>
CJ
rt\
VI

01037 C03ALT»TOT
UG/L AS CO



01007 BARIUMtTOT
UG/L AS B-A



0007* TURBIDITY
FTIJ



NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.POT4
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO.PUTW
MAX
MIN
NEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POT*
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.UEV
NO.POTto
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.PUTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
Al
13.0000
330.0000
30.0000
100.0000
77.8759
11.0000
300.0000
74.0000
155.0000
7<».b978
15.0000
68.0000
15.5000
31.4533
13. 1506
4.0000
68.0000
25.0000
48.7500
17.7645
3.0000
4U.UOOO
1.4000
14.9667
?1.7049
0.0
0.0
0.0
U.O
0.0
1.0000
160.0000
160.0000
160.0000
0.0000
1.0000
57.0000
57.0000
57.0000
0.0000
OTHER A
1.0000
154.0000
154.0000
154.0000
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0000
24.5000
24.5000
24.5000
0.0000
4.0000
76.5000
26.0000
49.8750
21.3477
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0000
30.0000
20.0000
25.0000
7.0711
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bl
5.0000
110.0000
32.0000
88.0000
32.1558
4.0000
160.0000
102,0000
1
-------
REPORT No.fl
                                                SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
                                                  TRICKLING
                                                   FILTER
                                                     (B)
                                                    11.0000
                                                    72.0000
                                                     4.0000
                                                    21.1091
                                                    20.0922

                                                     3.0000
                                                     9.0000
                                                     1*0000
                                                     4.1667
                                                     4.2525

                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0

                                                    45.0000
                                                  2034.0000
                                                    40.0000
                                                   628.6487
                                                   389.8845

                                                    66.0000
                                                   228.0000
                                                     5.0000
                                                    42.6500
                                                    37.0209

                                                    62.0000
                                                   245.0000
                                                     4.0000
                                                    48.5710
                                                    47.2754

                                                    28.0000
                                                   361.0000
                                                    26.0000
                                                   138.8036
                                                    80.2413

                                                     1.0000
                                                    66.0000
                                                    66.0000
                                                    66*0000
                                                     0.0000

1) NEGATIVE HEMOVALS DELETtO
2) PRIMARY  (A) INCLUDES A01,A02
3) TRICKLING FILTER  (H) INCLUDES 801,802,804,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE  (C) INCLUDES C01,C02,C05,C06,C09,C19,C20
5) SFCONDARY PLANTS ARE THOSE BIOLOGICAL  PLANTS WITH EFFLUENT
   AND GREATER THAN OH EQUAL TO 85*  REMOVAL FOR BOTH PARAMETERS
/PARAMETERS
y/

00550
TOT-SXLT



00556
SEP-FUNNEL



00560
iNFRaRED



00500
TOTAL, TS



00530
TOT NFLT»



00310
5DAY



00340
HI LEVEL



00335
LOW LEVEL


NflTF<:«

CATEGORY

OIL-GREASE




MG/L



OIL-GREASE




MG/L



OIL-GREASE




MG/L



RESIDUE




MG/L



RESIDUE
ss



BOD




COD




COD




MG/L




MG/L




MG/L




MG/L




NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.BEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.BEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.BEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO*BEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
PRIMARY
(A)
6.0000
44,0000
19.0000
27.8333
9.3310
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.0000
1642.0000
346.0000
688.8665
362.0049
54.0000
314.0000
15.0000
93.2722
62.4438
58.0000
650.0000
20.0000
166.7810
110.4911
16.0000
768.0000
58.0000
334.8125
222.3276
1.0000
345.0000
345.0000
345.0000
0.0000
ACTIVATED
  SLUDSF
                                                                    8.0000
                                                                  130.0060
                                                                    5.0000
                                                                   32.9250
                                                                   41.8917

                                                                    3.0000
                                                                    8.0000
                                                                    5.0000
                                                                    6.0QOO
                                                                    1.73Z1

                                                                    0.0
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    0.0
                                                                    0.0

                                                                   33.0000
                                                                 3440.0000
                                                                  294.0000
                                                                  712.2119
                                                                  578.5815

                                                                   64.0000
                                                                  185.0000
                                                                    2.0000
                                                                   37.1250
                                                                   39.7279

                                                                   65.0000
                                                                  230.0000
                                                                    2.0000
                                                                   28.2861
                                                                   40.7063

                                                                   27.0090
                                                                  275.0000
                                                                   31.7000
                                                                   98.3516
                                                                   65.3504

                                                                    5.0000
                                                                   51.0000
                                                                   14.0000
                                                                   27.8000
                                                                   13.8456
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (8 + C)
                 19.0000
                130.0000
                  4.0000
                 26.0842
                 30.7029

                  6.0000
                  9.0000
                  1*0000
                  5.0833
                  3.0727

                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0

                 78.0000
               3440.0000
                 40.0000
                664.0024
                477.1821

                130.0000
                228.0000
                  2.0000
                 39.9300
                 38.3284

                127.0000
                245.0000
                  2.0000
                 38.1889
                 45.0249

                 55.0000
                361.0000
                 26.0000
                118.9454
                 75.4455

                  6.0000
                 66.0000
                 14.0000
                 34.1667
                 19.9139
      PAGE

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
                  1.0000
                  9.4000
                  9.4000
                  9.4000
                  0.0000

                  2.0000
                  5.0000
                  1.0000
                  3.0000
                  2.8284

                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0

                  9.0000
                727.0000
                312.0000
                548.7776
                158.4633

                 31.0000
                 30.0000
                  2.0000
                 11.1935
                  7.1759

                 31.0000
                 28.0000
                  2.0000
                 10.5355
                  7.4303

                 15.0000
                231.0000
                 26.0000
                 65.7333
                 52.3604

                  4.0000
                 27.0000
                 14.0000
                 22.0000
                  5.5976
                                                                                                               1             5/23/75

                                                                                                                   TOTAL ALL PLANTS

                                                                                                                    'A*B*C*OTHER>
                 29.0000
                130.0000
                  1.0000
                 26.0414
                 26.4917

                  8.0000
                  9.0000
                  1.0000
                  4.5625
                  2.9693

                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0
                  0.0

                119.0000
               3440.0000
                 40.0000
                692.3796
                495.3723

                210.0000
                314.0000
                  2.0000
                 53.4518
                 52.1177

                209.0000
                650.0000
                  2.0000
                 74.6075
                 92,2027

                 86.0000
                768.0000
                 14.3000
                158.6546
                147.1832

                  9.0000
                345.0000
                 14.0000
                 74.2222
                104.4721
                                                                 -6.  AND SS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 30MG/L

-------
REPORT NO.?
SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
/PARAMETERS CATEGORY


00342 SEA COD
SALINE



3273n
MG/L



PHENOLlCS
4AAP DISTIL UG/L



0094=;




00940
CL


o»
CJ
CD
00665
PHOSPHORUS



00630
N02-N03



00610
AMMONIA



00625
KJEUOAHL.






SULFATE
MG/L



CHLORIDE
MG/L




TOTAL
MG/L



NITROGEN.
MG/L



NITROGEN,
MG/L



NITROGEN,
TOTAL MG/I




NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
•MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV

NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
PRIMARY
(A)
2.0000
514.0000
345.0000
429.5000
119.5015
7.0000
53.0000
0.1000
16.2928
23.0982
19.0000
150.0000
26.0000
69.1053
36.4370
41.0000
2169.0000
43.0000
296.8584
421.0542

10.0000
77.0000
1.3400
12.9470
22.6614
2.0000
10.0000
0.0300
5.0150
7.0499
64.0000
256,5999
2.1000
20.2024
34.6453
8.0000
47.0000
8.5000
24.3750
11.6458
 TRICKLING
  FILTER
    (B)
   9.0000
 315.0000
  18.0000
 122.7778
  87.4153

  15.0000
3000.0000
   0.0300
 208.8579
 772.2639

  17.0000
 454.0000
  22.0000
  94.8823
 106.4648

  33.0000
 488.0000
  32.0000
 115.0151
 100.3362

  27.0000
  18.3000
   3.2700
   9.0196
   3.8269

  20.0000
  16.0000
   0.0260
   5.5005
   4.7009

  66.0000
 115,0000
   0.0300
  16.6120
  I7.a7aa

  22.0000
  46.7500
   1.2000
  16.8109
  11.8657
                  ACTIVATED
                    SLUDGE
                     (C)
                   10.0000
                  173.0000
                   16.0000
                   83.2000
                   57.7828

                   18.0000
                 2000.0000
                    0.0200
                  134.6238
                  472.7300

                   25.0000
                  223.0000
                   33.0000
                   99.6400
                   57.9913

                   34.0000
                 1561.0000
                   43.0000
                  245.9382
                  288.7170

                   40.0000
                   10,4090
                    1.0000
                    5.2462
                    2.7136

                   21.0000
                   19.9000
                    0.0200
                    4.3681
                    5.9565

                   64.0000
                   27.5000
                    0.0700
                   11.0571
                    7.5512

                   12.0000
                   34.0000
                    1.5000
                   18.9658
                    9.6287
                                                                                  BIOLOGICAL
                                                                                    PLANTS
                                                                                     (B*C)
  19.0000
 315.0000
  16.0000
 101.9474
  74.0122

  33.0000
3000.0000
   0.0200
 168.3663
 617.2905

  42.0000
 454.0000
  22.0000
  97.7143
  79.9841

  67.0000
1561.0000
  32.0000
 181.4536
 225.6298

  67.0000
  18.3000
   1.0000
   6.7668
   3.6876

  41.0000
  19.9000
   0.0200
   4.9205
   5.3446

 130.0000
 115.0000
   0.0300
  13.8773
  13.6351

  34.0000
  46.7500
   1.2000
  17.5714
  11.0270
                       PAGE

                 SECONDARY

                   r-LANTS
                                                                                                    3.0000
                                                                                                   51.0000
                                                                                                   25.0000
                                                                                                   42.3333
                                                                                                   15.0112

                                                                                                    7.0000
                                                                                                   10.0000
                                                                                                    2.0000
                                                                                                    4.5971
                                                                                                    3.4961

                                                                                                    7.0000
                                                                                                  176.0000
                                                                                                   44.0000
                                                                                                  110.5714
                                                                                                   51.6584

                                                                                                   14.0000
                                                                                                  420.0000
                                                                                                   43.0000
                                                                                                  148.7143
                                                                                                   95.2359

                                                                                                   19.0000
                                                                                                   10,3000
                                                                                                    1.0000
                                                                                                    5.0300
                                                                                                    2.9706

                                                                                                   11.0000
                                                                                                   19.9000
                                                                                                    0.0800
                                                                                                    9.3600
                                                                                                    6.0649

                                                                                                   29.0000
                                                                                                   76.0000
                                                                                                    0.0300
                                                                                                    9.0310
                                                                                                   14.4904

                                                                                                    3.0000
                                                                                                   14.0000
                                                                                                    1.5000
                                                                                                    6.7333
                                                                                                    6.4933
            5/23/75

  TOTAL ALL PLANTS

   (A»B+C*OTHER)
   24.0000
  514.0000
   16.0000
  123.7083
  119.1603

   49.0000
30000.0000
    0.0200
  729.1465
 4298.9219

   70.0000
  470.0000
   17.0000
  106.6286
   98.8269

  123.0000
 2169.0000
   32.0000
  227.6714
  309.8406

   95.0000
   77.0000
    0.4600
    7.0187
    8.2370

   56.0000
   23.8000
    0.0100
    4.9501
    5.7187

  218.0000
  256.5999
    0.0300
   15.0710
   21.8995

   51.0000
   47.0000
    1.2000
   16.8844
   11.5900
 1)  NEGATIVE HEMOVALS DELETtO
 2)  PRIMARY (A) INCLUDES A01.A02
 3)  TRICKLING FIJLTEH (B) INCLUDES R01,802.804,605
 4)  aCTlVATEO SLUDGE (C) INCLUDES C01.C02.C05,C06,C09,C19,C20
 51  SFCONDlkRY PL4NTS ARE THOSE BIOLOGICAL PLANTS WITH EFFLUENT SOD-*.  AND  SS LESS  THAN  OR  EQUAL  TO 3OMGXL
    A.ND GREATER THAN OH EQUAL TO 85*  REMOVAL FOR BOTH PARAMETERS

-------
 REPORT NO.P
                         SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
/PARAMETERS


0100?
AS



01027
CD



01034
CP



01051
PB


l
LJ
^° 71900
HG



0104?
CU



01097




01067
NI


Kin T ETC •


TOT ARSENIC
UG/L



TOT CADMIUM
UG/L



TOT CHROMIUM
UG/L



TOT LFAO
UG/L




TOT MF.KCURY
UG/L



TOT COPPER
UG/L



TOT ANTIMONY
UG/i



TOT NICKEL
UG/L



CATEGORY


NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO.porw
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV

NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
PRIMARY

(A)
1.0000
2.0000
2.0000
2.0000
0.0000
36.0000
40.0000
3.0000
14.0833
8.9805
43.0000
2600.0000
6.0000
188.3488
405.9954
37.0000
1700.0000
10.0000
156.0270
?72.0637

23.0000
5.0000
0.1000
0.9826
1.3193
48.0000
1700.0000
10.0000
191.0833
278.2056
O.U
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.UOOO
1700.0000
6.0000
164*5757
3f 7.1609
                                      TRICKLING
                                       FILTER
                                         (B)
                                        4.0000
                                       20.0000
                                        0.5000
                                        6.8250
                                        8.9623

                                       43.0000
                                       66.0000
                                        1.0000
                                       11.2395
                                       10.4963

                                       56.0000
                                     3200.0000
                                        3.0000
                                      235.3929
                                      563*0,393

                                       47.0000
                                     1800. 0000
                                        5.0000
                                      116.0213
                                      276.3105

                                       24.0000
                                       10.0000
                                        0.1000
                                        0.9620
                                        1.9679

                                       56.0000
                                     1800.0000
                                        2.6000
                                      132.6892
                                      263.0766

                                        0.0
                                        0.0
                                        0.0
                                        0.0
                                        0.0

                                       40.0000
                                     1533.0000
                                        7.0000
                                      198.0425
                                      335.9666
                                               ACTIVATED
                                                 SLUDGE
                                                  
-------
 REPORT NO.P
                                                 SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
/PARAMETERS CATEGORY

01147 TOT SELENIUM
UG/L



01077 TOT STLVER
AG UG/L



0109? TOT ZTNC
ZN UG/L



0110? TOT TIN
UG/L


Ol
I
° 00680 TOT ORG CARBON
TOTAL, TOC MG/L



00410 ALKALINITY
PH 4.S MG/L



00400 PH
su



00095 SPECIFIC
CONDUCTANCE MICROMHO




NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
PRIMARY
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
i.oooo
13.0000
13.0000
13.0000
0.0000
49.0000
3600.0000
30.0000
550.0610
657.9351
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35.0000
539.0000
52.0000
141.7999
84.2303
9.0000
300.0000
18.5000
167.0555
91.8010
59.0000
8.2000
5.0000
7.0764
0.4998
5.0000
970.0000
550.0000
737.0000
192.9903
NOTE*!
i  NEGATIVE REMOVALS DELETED
   PRIMARY (A) INCLUDES A01.A02
   TRICKLING FILTER   INCLUDES «01.802,804,805
                                                   TRICKLING
                                                    FILTER
                                                      (8)
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0

                                                     a.oooo
                                                   445.7000
                                                     2.0000
                                                   223.8500
                                                   313.7434

                                                    60.0000
                                                  2600.0000
                                                    40.0000
                                                   316.1665
                                                   463.5981

                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0

                                                    23.000W
                                                   129.0000
                                                    23.0000
                                                    54.3000
                                                    26.2976

                                                    22.0000
                                                   344.0000
                                                    41.0000
                                                   180.1136
                                                    91.7973

                                                    67.0000
                                                     8.0000
                                                     4.0000
                                                     7.1659
                                                     0.5876

                                                    15.0000
                                                  1480.0000
                                                   634.0000
                                                   952.2666
                                                   312.1035
                                                                   ACTIVATED
                                                                     SLUDGE
                                                                     2.0000
                                                                     2.0000
                                                                     2.0000
                                                                     2.0000
                                                                     0.0

                                                                     0.0
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     0.0
                                                                     0.0

                                                                    69.0000
                                                                  1400.0000
                                                                    10.0000
                                                                   237.6420
                                                                   257.2742

                                                                     3.0000
                                                                 12600.0000
                                                                   400.0000
                                                                  4466.6641
                                                                  7043.6797

                                                                    14.0000
                                                                    95.0000
                                                                    10.0000
                                                                    35.3357
                                                                    22.4007

                                                                    22.0000
                                                                   400.0000
                                                                    78.0000
                                                                   248.0909
                                                                    93.7499

                                                                    54.0000
                                                                     8.3000
                                                                     6.2000
                                                                     7.2146
                                                                     0.4604

                                                                    20.0000
                                                                  2780.0000
                                                                   760.0000
                                                                  1369.3999
                                                                   518.5095
  BIOLOGICAL
    PLANTS
     
-------
 REPORT NO.8
                                                 SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
Ol
/PARAMETERS CATEGORY

01105 TOT
AL



01045 TOT
FE



0105<; TOT
MN



50060

ALUMINUM
UG/L



IRON
UG/L



MANGANESE
UG/L



CHLORINE,
TOT RESIDUAL MG/L



00720
TOTAL



38260




00620
NITRATE






CYANIDE,
MG/L



MBAS
MG/L



NITROGEN*
MG/L




NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
•MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO.POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.BEV
NO.POTW
MAX
Alt*
MEAN
STD.OEV
PRIMARY
(A)
1.0000
410.0000
410.0000
410.0000
0.0000
30.0000
5000.0000
400.0000
1517.6333
1023.4553
22.0000
390.0000
30.0000
175.8636
111.6616
26.0000
10.0000
0.2000
1.9558
1.9374
4.0000
0.1700
0.0200
0.0750
0.0656
6.0000
17.8000
0.4250
5.6725
6.3253
40.0000
6.5000
0.0100
1.0554
1.1591
                                                   TRICKLING
                                                    FILTER
                                                      (B)
                                                     6.0000
                                                  1450.0000
                                                    20*0000
                                                   510.0000
                                                   569.8840

                                                    35.0000
                                                 65550.0000
                                                   100.0000
                                                  2905.5999
                                                 11024.6836

                                                    28.0000
                                                   580.0000
                                                    20.0000
                                                   136.3214
                                                   129.9118

                                                    20.0000
                                                     3.0000
                                                     0.1000
                                                     1.9845
                                                     0.9363

                                                     8.0000
                                                   100.0000
                                                     0.0030
                                                    12.5066
                                                    35.3526

                                                     9.0000
                                                     3.2800
                                                     0.5700
                                                     1.7156
                                                     0.9443

                                                    33.0000
                                                    11.3800
                                                     0.1200
                                                     2*1570
                                                     2.5661
 ACTIVATED
   SLUDGE
    (C)
  11.0000
 570.0000
 100.0000
 193.6364
 135.0016

  37.0000
6800.0000
 100.0000
 746.7837
1171.4160

  23.0000
 940.0000
  10.0000
 144.2174
 200.4855

  22.0000
   3.0000
   0.2000
   1.3555
   0.8003

  20.0000
   2.2600
   0.0020
   0.1380
   0.5009

   8.0000
   3.2900
   0.2000
   1.1600
   1.1336

  30.0000
   8.0000
   0.02QO
   1.8597
   2.2995
  BIOLOGICAL
    PLANTS
     (B*C)
   17.0000
 1450.0000
   20.0000
  305.2939
  362.2170

   72.0000
65550.0000
  100.0000
 1796.2083
 7751.0938

   51.0000
  940.0000
   10.0000
  139.8823
  163.7516

   42.0000
    3.0000
    0.1000
    1.6550
    0.9140

   28.0000
  100.0000
    0.0020
    3.6719
   18.8833

   17.0000
    3.2900
    0.2000
    1.4541
    1.0439

   63.0000
   11.3800
    0.0200
    2.0154
    2.4278
       PAGE

 SECONDARY

   PLANTS
   5.0000
 200.0000
 100.0000
 160.0000
  54.7717

  17.0000
1000.0000
 100.0000
 298.8235
 223.4851

  11.0000
 190.0000
  10.0000
  82.3636
  56.4114

  14.0000
   3.0000
   0.7200
   1.8693
   0.8210

  10.0000
   0.1400
   0.0020
   0.0319
   0.0447

   2.0000
   0.2200
   0.2000
   0.2100
   0.0141

  10.0000
   6.7400
   0.0500
   2.0110
   2.2987
            5/23/75

  TOTAL ALL PLANTS

    (A*8+C+OTHER)
   23.0000
 1450.0000
   20.0000
  281.3042
  316.5637

  117.0000
65550.0000
   35.0000
 1600.8801
 6121.0117

   84.0000
  940.0000
   10.0000
  146.5357
  145.4156

   74.0000
   10.0000
    0.0700
    1.6957
    1.3871

   41.0000
  100.0000
    0.0920
    2.5179
   15.6087

   25.0000
   17.8000
    0.2000
    2.3778
    3.5671

  106.0000
   11.3800
    0.0100
    1.6404
    2.0528
NOTE**
1) NEGATIVE HEMOVALS DELETtO
2) PRIMARY  (A) INCLUDES A01.A02
3) TRICKLING FILTER  (B) INCLUDES B01.802,604,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE  (C) INCLUDES C01»C02.C05,C06,C09,C19,C20
5) SFCONDnRY PLANTS ARE THOSE BIOLOGICAL  PLANTS WITH  EFFLUENT  BOO-S  AND SS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 30MG/L
   A.ND GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 85* REMOVAL FOR BOTH  PAKAMETERS

-------
  REPORT  NO.fl

/PARAMETERS
V
CATEGORY
——•»--*>
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
TRICKLING
 FILTER
   (B)
ACTIVATED
  SLU06E
   (C)
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (8*0
      PAGE  f>

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          5/23/T5

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 
-------
  REPORT NO.P

/PARAMETERS
V
CATEGORY
—-—*>
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
TRICKLING
 FILTER
   (B)
ACTIVATED
  SLUDGE
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (B+C)
      PAGE  7

SECONDARY

  PLANTS
          5/23/75

TOTAL ALL PLANTS

 U*B*C*OTHER)
01065 NICKEL,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS NT



01025 CADMIUM,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS en



oiosft MANGANESE,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS MN



7i89o MERCURY,
DISSOLVED MG/L AS HG



70507 TOT OPTHO-
PHOSPHATF MG/L



oo69o TOT CARBON
MG/L AS c



00900 HARDNESS,
TOTAI MG/L



00425 ALKALINITY
-RTCARBONATF MG/L


KlrtTCe- t
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO.porw
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTw
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
31.0000
0.8200
0.1000
0.1313
0.1330
31.0000
0.0300
0.0100
0.0124
0.0062
31.0000
0.3600
0.0005
0.1578
0.0796
25.0000
0.0017
0.0001
0.0005
0.0004
33.0000
7.7000
0.7000
3.2524
1.6278
28.0000
580.0000
88.0000
180.6964
95.0200
14.0000
330.0000
30.0000
103.8571
76.2000
11.0000
300.0000
74.0000
155.0000
74.6980
                                                    10.0000
                                                     0.1000
                                                     0.1000
                                                     0.1000
                                                     0.0

                                                    10.0000
                                                     0.0100
                                                     0.0100
                                                     0.0100
                                                     0.0000

                                                    10.0000
                                                     0.1100
                                                     0.0300
                                                     0.0740
                                                     0.02SO

                                                     8.0000
                                                     0.0018
                                                     0.0001
                                                     0.0007
                                                     0.0005

                                                    20.0000
                                                    13.0000
                                                     0.7000
                                                     5.2875
                                                     3.8093

                                                    10.0000
                                                   160.0000
                                                    50.0000
                                                    81.5000
                                                    35.2334

                                                     6.0000
                                                   110.0000
                                                    32.0000
                                                    80.6667
                                                    33.9097

                                                     4.0000
                                                   160.0000
                                                   102.0000
                                                   122.0000
                                                    25.8716
                                                10.0000
                                                 0.8000
                                                 o.ioeo
                                                 0.1850
                                                 0.2212

                                                10.0000
                                                 0,1200
                                                 0.0100
                                                 0.0210
                                                 0.0348

                                                10.0080
                                                 0.2600
                                                 0.0200
                                                 0.1140
                                                 0.0857

                                                 9.0000
                                                 0.0010
                                                 0.0001
                                                 0.0006
                                                 0.0003

                                                13.0000
                                                28.0000
                                                 0.1000
                                                 5.6000
                                                 8.3430

                                                 6.0000
                                                90.0000
                                                24.0000
                                                56.3333
                                                22.5359

                                                 6.0000
                                              632.0000
                                                60.0000
                                              191.3333
                                              221.4921

                                                 4.0000
                                              104.0000
                                                22.0000
                                                62.0000
                                                42.9884
                                                 20.0000
                                                  0.8000
                                                  0.1000
                                                  0.1425
                                                  0.1583

                                                 20.0000
                                                  0.1200
                                                  0.0100
                                                  0.0155
                                                  0.0246

                                                 20.0000
                                                  0.2600
                                                  0.0200
                                                  0.0940
                                                  0.0653

                                                 17.0000
                                                  0.0018
                                                  0.0001
                                                  0.0006
                                                  0.0004

                                                 33.0000
                                                 28.0000
                                                  0.1000
                                                  5.4106
                                                  5.8942

                                                 16.0000
                                                160.0000
                                                 24.0000
                                                 72.0625
                                                 32.7481

                                                 12.0000
                                                632.0000
                                                 32.0000
                                                136.0000
                                                161.7472

                                                  8.0000
                                                160.0000
                                                 22.0000
                                                 92.0000
                                                 45.9065
                                                  6.0000
                                                  0.1000
                                                  0.1000
                                                  0.1000
                                                  0.0001

                                                  6.0000
                                                  0.0100
                                                  0.0100
                                                  0.0100
                                                  0.0000

                                                  6.0000
                                                  0.1100
                                                  0.0200
                                                  0.0750
                                                  0.0339

                                                  4.0000
                                                  0.0007
                                                  0.0001
                                                  0.0005
                                                  0.0003

                                                  6.0000
                                                  6.6000
                                                  1.0000
                                                  2.7167
                                                  2.0331

                                                  4.0000
                                                160.0000
                                                 40.0000
                                                 81.5000
                                                 53.6002

                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0

                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
                                                 52.0000
                                                  0.8200
                                                  0.1000
                                                  0.1350
                                                  0.1407

                                                 52.0000
                                                  0.1200
                                                  0.0100
                                                  0.0137
                                                  0.0158

                                                 52.0000
                                                  0.3600
                                                  0*0005
                                                  0.1348
                                                  0.0807

                                                 43.0000
                                                  0.0023
                                                  0.0001
                                                  0.0006
                                                  0.0005

                                                 68.0000
                                                 28.0000
                                                  0.1000
                                                  4.3762
                                                  4.3830

                                                 46.0000
                                                580.0000
                                                 24.0000
                                                145.4239
                                                 94.1036

                                                 26.0000
                                                632.0000
                                                 30.0000
                                                118.6923
                                                121.6461

                                                 19.0000
                                                300.0000
                                                 22.0000
                                                128.4737
                                                 70.2899
1) NEGATIVE HEMOVALS DELETtD
2) PRIMARY  (A) INCLUDES 401.A02
3) TRICKLING FILTER  (H) INCLUDES R01,802,804,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE  (C) INCLUDES C01,C02,C05,C06,C09,C19,C20
5) SECONDARY PLANTS ARE THOSE BIOLOGICAL  PLANTS WITH  EFFLUENT  ttOD-S  AND  SS  LESS  THAN OR EQUAL TO 30MG/L
   AND GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 85*  REMOVAL  FOR BOTH  PAKAMETERS

-------
 REPORT NO.P

/PARAMETERS
y
CATEGORY
PRIMARY

  (A)
                            SUMMARY OF POTW EFFLUENT DATA
                              TRICKLING
                               FILTER
                                  (B)
ACTIVATED
  SLUDGE
   (C)
BIOLOGICAL
  PLANTS
   (B*C)
                                                                                                           PAGE

                                                                                                     SECONDARY

                                                                                                       PLANTS
          5/23/75

TOTAL ALL PI ANTS

 (A»B+C+OTHER)
CTl
I
00050
P 'OSPHATE



00070




00671
TOTAL
MG/L



TURBIDITY
JTL



DISSOLVED
ORTHOPHOSPHATE MG/L



01037




01007




0007*







COBALT. TOT
UG/L AS CO



BARIUM. TOT
UG/L AS BA



TURRIOITY
FTU



NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.OEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STD.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
NO. POTW
MAX
MIN
MEAN
STO.DEV
16.0000
68.0000
15.5000
31.0187
12.8231
7.0000
76.5000
25.0000
48.5000
19.4915
3.000U
40.0000
1.4000
14.9667
21.7049
2.0000
30.0000
20.0000
25.0000
7.0711
1.0000
160.0000
160.0000
160.0000
0.0000
1.0000
57.0000
57.0000
57.0000
0.0000
                                                    21.0000
                                                    36.5000
                                                     1.5600
                                                    17.3709
                                                    10.3413

                                                    12.UUOO
                                                    99.0000
                                                    15.0000
                                                    34.5250
                                                    21.8395

                                                     3.0UOO
                                                     6.7500
                                                     4.2000
                                                     5.1500
                                                     1.3937

                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0
                                                     0.0

                                                     1.0000
                                                   100.0000
                                                   100.0000
                                                   100.0000
                                                     0.0000

                                                     2.0000
                                                    25.0000
                                                    10.0000
                                                    17.5000
                                                    10.6066
                                               11.0000
                                               90.0000
                                                1.1000
                                               24.6991
                                               23.4743

                                                8.0000
                                               54.0000
                                                3.0000
                                               23.7625
                                               14.3987

                                                3.0000
                                                3.0000
                                                0.1600
                                                1.4533
                                                1.4368

                                                2.0000
                                               20*0000
                                               20.0000
                                               20.0000
                                                0.0271

                                                i.oueo
                                             5800.0000
                                             5800.0000
                                             5800.0000
                                                n.OOOO

                                                1.0000
                                                6.0000
                                                6.0000
                                                6.0000
                                                0.0060
                                                 32.0000
                                                 90.0000
                                                  1.1000
                                                 19.8243
                                                 16.1120

                                                 20.0000
                                                 99.0000
                                                  3.0000
                                                 30.2200
                                                 19.5392

                                                  6.0000
                                                  6.7500
                                                  0.1600
                                                  3.3017
                                                  2.3880

                                                  2.0000
                                                 20.0000
                                                 20.0000
                                                 20.0000
                                                  0.0271

                                                  2.0000
                                               5800.0000
                                                100.0000
                                               2950.0000
                                               4030.5212

                                                  3.0000
                                                 25.0000
                                                  6.0000
                                                 13.6667
                                                 10.0167
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0

                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  o.o

                                  2.0000
                                  1.2000
                                  0.1600
                                  0.6800
                                  0.7354

                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0

                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0
                                  0.0

                                  1.0000
                                  6.0000
                                  6.0000
                                  6.0000
                                  0.0000
                                 49.0000
                                 90.0000
                                  1.1000
                                 23.6516
                                 15.7270

                                 30.0000
                                 99.0000
                                  3.0000
                                 34.4400
                                 20.8352

                                 10.0000
                                 40.0000
                                  0.1600
                                  7.9710
                                 12.0081

                                  5.0000
                                 30.0000
                                 20.0000
                                 22.0000
                                  4.4721

                                  3.0000
                               5800.0000
                                100.0000
                               2020.0000
                               3273.6921

                                  4.0000
                                 57.0000
                                  6.0000
                                 24.5000
                                 23.1588
NOTE*: I
1) NEGATIVE KEMOVALS OELETtO
2) PRIMARY (A) INCLUDES A01.A02
3) TRICKLING FIJLTER (B) INCLUDES R01.802,804,805
4) ACTIVATED SLUDGE 
-------
                                            TABLE  6-1

                                 CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
                                         OF REMOVAL DATA
                                        (PERCENT OF PLANTS)
PERCENT
REMOVAL
CADMIUM



CHROMIUM



LEAD



MERCURY



COPPER



NICKEL



ZINC



IRON



MANGANESE



PHOSPHORUS
TOTAL



PP
TFP
ASP
BP
- PP
TFP
- ASP
BP
PP
- TFP
- ASP
- BP
PP
TFP
ASP
BP
PP
TFP
ASP
BP
PP
TFP
ASP
BP
PP
TFP
ASP
BP
PP
TFP
- ASP
BP
PP
TFP
ASP
BP

- PP
TFP
ASP
BP
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100

26
43
34
38
61
71
74
73
56
71
67
69
62
70
71
70
70
98
97
97
18
56
59
58
82
92
95
94
93
93
97
95
37
76
73
75

INSUFFICIENT
100
100
100
75
88
83
19
43
30
35
44
67
74
71
50
59
59
59
52
60
65
63
47
92
94
93
7
50
43
46
61
87
91
89
81
90
91
91
18
66
68
68

DATA
50
77
67
6
37
27
32
36
60
67
64
41
54
57
56
33
55
62
59
34
76
78
77
7
34
30
32
39
79
84
82
67
77
85
82
12
47
47
47


33
69
55
6
26
20
23
25
48
56
52
24
51
53
52
33
50
44
46
27
71
75
73
4
16
16
16
32
62
81
72
41
60
74
68
6
33
42
38


20
50
38
3
9
16
13
19
31
43
37
15
34
43
39
29
10
29
26
18
51
63
58
4
13
8
10
26
40
64
53
26
40
71
57
6
28
31
30


12
33
25
3
9
11
10
19
21
41
31
9
27
31
29
19
10
18
22
11
3?
51
46
4
6
4
5
13
29
52
41
15
30
63
48
6
9
21
15


4
25
17
3
3
7
5
6
17
39
28
9
15
20
18
14
0
12
11
9
31
37
34
4
6
4
5
3
15
40
28
11
23
49
37
6
4
21
13


4
13
10
0
0
2
1
0
8
20
15
3
10
8
9
0

6
7
0
22
19
21
4
3
0
1
3
6
22
15
4
20
31
26
6
0
15
8


4
8
7


0
0

4
10
6
0
5
2
3


0
4

8
3
5
4
0

0
0
0
9
5
0
0
23
12
0

15
8


4
2
3





0
0
0

0
0
0



0

0
0
0
0


0


0
0



0


0
0


0
0
0
31
35
44
79
36
48
54
102
34
41
49
90
21
20
34
54
44
49
63
112
28
32
49
81
38
52
58
110
27
30
35
65
16
21
19
40


24
36
60
TOTAL
"KJELDALH"
NITROGEN



AMMONIA



PHENOLICS




PP
TFP
ASP
BP
PP
TFP
- ASP
BP
- PP
TFP
- ASP
- BP


INSUFFICIENT
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
90
90
90
71
79
93
86
INSUFFICIENT
100
100
100
83
94
89

DATA
80
63
74
38
77
78
78
DATA
83
88
86


70
45
61
23
56
63
60

67
81
75


60
27
48
9
41
55
48

67
81
75


50
18
39
7
31
44
32

58
75
68


40
18
32
4
27
34
30

50
69
61


35
18
29
0
20
29
25

25
63
46


15
9
13

16
25
21

8
50
32


5
9
6

8
17
13

0
31
18


0
0
0

0
0
0


0
0


20
11
31
42
48
47
95

12
16
28
TOTAL
ORGANIC
CARBON
              PP
              TFP
              ASP
              BP
100
100
70
96
50
96
33
96
 27
 91
100
 94
17
87
92
89
 0
70
92
78
                                                        39
                                                        77
                                                        53
                                                        17
                                                        23
                                                        19
30
23
13
36
CHEMICAL
OXYGEN
DEMAND



SUSPENDED
SOLIDS





- PP
- TFP
- ASP
- BP

- PP
- TFP
- ASP
- BP


100


100



100
100


83


100

100
100
98
99


44

100
100

96
98
98
98


33
100
98
99

85
95
95
95


11
94
98
96

74
92
94
93


11
86
95
91

53
86
87
87


11
81
83
82

34
85
76
80


11
56
73
64

11
73
66
70


6
31
48
39

4
45
56
51


0
11
15
13

2
24
34
29



0
0
0

0
0
0
0


18
36
40
76

47
66
62
128
                                                        6-45

-------
                                          TABLE  6-1  (Continued)

                                    CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
                                            OF REMOVAL DATA
                                          (PERCENT OF PLANTS)
PERCENT
REMOVAL                  0	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100	N_

BIOCHEMICAL
OXYGEN
DEMAND        PP        100     83      65      42      29      17      12       6       2       0               52
              TFP       100     98      98      97      97      92      88      77      63      20        0      60
              ASP              100      98      98      98      97      92      83      72      46        0      65
              BP        100     99      98      98      98      94      90      80      68      34        0     125


            NOTES:   1)   pp - Primary Plants (AO1, AO2)
                     2)   TFP - Trickling Filter Plants (B01, BO2, BO4, BOS)
                     3)   ASP - Activated Sludge Plants (CO1, CO2, COS, CO6, CO9, C19, C20)
                     4)   BP   Biological Plants (TFP + ASP)
                     5)   N - Number of Plants
                                                       6-46

-------
                                                            TABLE  6-2

                                                CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
                                                         OP EFFLUENT DATA
                                                        (PERCENT OF PLANTS)
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1)^
CADMIUM - PP
        - TFP
        - ASP
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION
CHROMIUM- PP
        - TFP
        - ASP
          BP
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1)^
LEAD    - PP
        - TFP
        - ASP
        - BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1) ^
MERCURY - PP
        - TFP
          ASP
        - BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1) X
COPPER  - PP
          TFP
          ASP
          BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1) ^
NICKEL  - PP
          TFP
        - ASP
          BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1) Ł_
ZINC      PP
          TFP
        - ASP
          BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1) Z
IRON      PP
          TFP
          ASP
          BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (ug/1) 2L
MANGANESE - PP
            TFP
          - ASP
          - BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (mg/1) Z.
PHOSPHORUS- PP
TOTAL     - TFP
            ASP
            BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (mg/1) >
TOTAL       PP
KJELDAHL    TFP
NITROGEN    ASP
            BP

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION   (mg/1 ) 2.
AMMONIA     PP
            TFP
          - ASP
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
0
4
89
83
92
88
50
73
48
42
45
50
81
58
57
57
0.4
70
77
62
68
50
88
52
51
52
50
64
66
57
61
100
92
79
65
72
600
90
65
30
46
6.0
82
68
78
73
2
90
100
93
96
5
8
80
68
75
72
100
45
35
25
29
100
54
24
14
19
0.8
30
27
32
31
100
54
30
31
30
100
39
47
23
33
200
71
39
39
39
1200
53
24
16
20
120
64
39
26
33
4
80
89
58
70
10
12
40
22
31
27
150
28
25
17
21
150
30
13
10
11
1.2
17
14
16
15
150
33
13
13
13
150
12
29
11
18
300
51
26
18
22
1800
30
12
8
10
180
41
21
17
20
6
60
70
38
51
15
16
37
17
27
22
200
25
23
15
19
200
24
9
8
8
1.6
9
14
14
14
200
25
13
9
11
200
9
26
11
17
400
31
19
14
16
2400
20
9
3
6
240
36
14
13
14
8
50
63
20
37
20
20
34
15
19
17
250
18
21
12
16
250
5
9
2
5
2.0
9
5
11
8
250
19
9
4
7
250
9
16
7
11
500
31
16
12
14
3000
10
6
3
4
300
18
14
13
14
10
10
41
5
19
25
24
11
5
4
4
300
15
21
12
16
300
5
9
0
4
2.4
9
5
5
5
300
19
9
4
7
300
9
16
5
10
600
27
11
9
10
3600
3
6
3
4
360
9
11
9
10
12
10
26
0
10
30
28
9
5
4
4
350
13
17
12
14
350
5
9

4
2.8
9
5
5
5
350
13
9
3
6
350
6
16
5
10
700
24
9
8
8
4200
3
6
3
4
420
0
4
9
6
14
10
7

3
35
32
0
2
2
2
400
10
17
12
14
400
3
9

4
3.2
9
5
5
5
400
13
9
1
5
400
6
16
4
9
800
22
9
8
8
4800
3
6
3
4
480

4
4
4
16
10
7

3
40
36

2
2
2
450
10
12
8
10
450
3
7

3
3.6
9
5
5
5
450
10
9
1
5
450
6
13
4
7
900
20
9
3
6
5400
0
6
3
4
540

4
4
4
18
10
4

1
45
40

2
2
2
500
8
12
8
10
500
3
7

3
4.0
9
5
5
5
500
8
6
1
3
500
6
11
4
6
1000
16
7
3
5
6000

6
3
4
600

0
4
2
20
10
0

0
50
N
35
41
48
89

40
52
60
112

37
45
51
96

23
22
37
59

48
54
68
122

33
38
56
94

49
57
66
123

30
34
37
71

22
28
23
51

10
27
40
67

INSUFFICIENT DATA
100
100
100
0
100
100
100
100
86
83
85
4
97
86
79
83
67
83
73
8
84
69
59
64
48
67
55
12
57
57
43
50
29
58
39
16
40
36
25
31
10
25
15
20
24
26
13
20
10
8
9
24
17
14
5
9
10
0
6
28
11
11
0
5
5

3
32
5
8

4
5

3
36
3
6

3
0

0
40
3
5

2
21
12
33

63
65
63
128
                                                              6-47

-------
                                               TABLE 6-2  (Continued)
                                       CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
                                                 OF  EFFLUENT DATA
                                                (PERCENT OF  PLANTS)
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION  (ug/1) 2.   °
PHENOLICS  - PP
             TFP        100
             ASP        100
             BP         100
38
75
59
  234
INSUFFICIENT DATA
 38      38      38
 75      50      38
 59      45      38
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) Z.    0      30     60     90      120
TOTAL        PP         100     100     97     77      54
ORGANIC      TFP        100      96     30     13        4
CARBON       ASP        100      50     14       7        0
             BP         100      78     24     11        3
38
31
34
                             150
                              31
                               0
38
31
34
                               180
                                17
38
31
34
               210
                 9
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION (mg/1)^    0      40     80    120      160      200      240     280
CHEMICAL     PP         100     100     89     89       79       68       63      63
OXYGEN       TFP        100      94     72     47       22       14        8       8
DEMAND       ASP        100      78     43     20       15        8        3       0
             BP         100      86     57     33       18       11        5       4
38
31
34
                240
                  9
                                                       320
                                                        58
                                                         3
38
13
24
               270
                 3
                                                       360
                                                        42
                                                         3
10

31
 6
17
              300
                3
                                       400
                                         37
                                         0
13
16
29
                                                                          35
                                                                          23
                                                                          14
                                                                          37
                                          19
                                          36
                                          40
                                          76
EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) Z.   0       20     40     60       80      100      120     140      160    180     200
SUSPENDED    PP         100      98     93     78       48       24       20      13       11      9       9       54
SOLIDS       TFP        100      73     42     17       9        6        5       3        222       66
             ASP        100      58     31     20       11        8        6       6        3      2       0       64
             BP         100      65     37     18       10        7        5       5        22       1      130

EFFLUENT
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) .2.   0       20     40     60       80      100      120     140      160    180     200
BIOCHEMICAL- PP         100     100     97     93       86       74       59      52       45     36      28       58
OXYGEN       TFP        100      82     41     20       15       13        8       7        55       3       61
DEMAND       ASP        100      40     20      8       5        5        5       5        3      3       2       65
             BP         100      60     30     13       10        9        6       6        442      126
                1)  PP - Primary Plants  (AO1, A02)
                2)  TFP   Trickling Filter Plants  (BO1,
                3)  ASP   Activated Sludge Plants  (CO1,
                4)  BP - Biological Plants  (TFP + ASP)
                5)  N - Number of Plants
                       B02, B04,
                       CO2, COS,
                           805)
                           C06,  C09, C19, C20)
                                                               6-48

-------
     Evaluation of Limited Data
     Table 6-3 is a summary of removal and effluent data for
oil and grease, cyanide (total),  and hexavalent chromium in
primary and biological treatment plants.  The data presented
for oil and grease is a combination of the original oil and
grease data obtained by three distinct analytical methods
as distinguished by STORET numbers 00550, 00556, and 00560.

     Of these parameters,  oil and grease removal was most
significant with approximately 50 percent removal achieved
in primary plants and an average removal of 74 percent in
biological plants.  It was noted that the oil and grease
removal for biological plants ranged from 19 to nearly 98%.
The variability of oil and grease removal is probably due
to a variety of factors specific to the municipal plant
(i.e., detention time, biomass acclimation, influent concen-
tration, skimmers, type and chain length of oil and grease,
presence of other pollutants, etc.).  For plants reporting
oil and grease data, pass through was 25-27.8 mg/1 in primary
plants, and averaged 9.5 mg/1 in biological plants.
     Removal of cyanide and hexavalent chromium was reported
only by biological treatment facilities.  Removal varied
from 3 to 29 percent and 0 to 18 percent respectively, thus
indicating only incidental removal of these pollutants in
biological treatment plants.  Corresponding effluent values
were 0.01 to 3.7 mg/1 for cyanide and 10 to 15-tyg/l for
hexavalent chromium.  As a result of the limited number of
plants reporting oil and grease,  cyanide and hexavalent
chromium data, this information should not be considered
conclusive, but rather indicative of the performance of
similar treatment facilities.

     A limited amount of data was also reported on biological
treatment plants with chemical addition, and tertiary plants.
Tertiary plants include facilities designated as C07, COS,
CIO, D01, D02, D06, and D07, as defined in Appendix 6, Report
No. 2.  Table 6-4 summarizes this data with mean and median
values for removal reported, along with the number of plants
reporting data.  Again, no attempt was made to characterize
the performance of these plants due to the limited extent of
the data base.  Nevertheless, the table confirms the expected
general improved removal of metals experienced in plants
utilizing chemical addition.
                             6-49

-------
     Table 6-5 is presented to facilitate a comparison of
pollutant removals in biological and secondary treatment
plants.  Biological plants include all trickling filter and
activated sludge facilities as defined in the table.  In
this analysis, secondary plants were defined as those
biological plants with effluent BOD and SS equal to or
less than 30 mg/1, and achieving 85% or greater removal
for both parameters, for the data reported.
     It should be noted that this definition is more restric-
tive than the prescribed method for determining secondary
treatment, as specified in the Federal Register (Appendix 2).
This results from the fact that the regulatory definition
of secondary treatment provides for compliance with the
limitations outlined above over a 30 day period, utilizing
an arithmetic mean of observed values.  On the other hand,
the data utilized in the computer analysis to a large
degree represents influent and effluent values obtained over
a one day period only.  As a result, many treatment plants
satisfying the official definition of secondary treatment
did not qualify as such in this analysis, thus accounting
for the relatively small number of secondary plants shown
in the table.

     Nevertheless, the limited data generated in this analysis
generally confirms the expected result of greater removals
being achieved in plants meeting the definition of secondary
treatment.  Of the eleven parameters reported in the table,
higher removals were attained on secondary plants for eight
pollutants, including chromium, lead, mercury, copper, zinc,
ammonia, total organic carbon and chemical oxygen demand.
The parameters for which increased removals were not exper-
ienced in secondary plants included only cadmium,  nickel
and phenol.
                               6-50

-------
                                      TABLE 6-3
                          REMOVAL AND EFFLUENT DATA SUMMARY
                           FOR OIL AND GREASE, CYANIDE AND
                                 HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
                     Primary Plants (PP)
Biological Treatment Plants  (BP)
Percent Removal
Mean N
O&G
CYN
HEX.
I
en
(mg/1) 48
(mg/1) 0
CR. (jig/1) 0

6
1
3

Effluent
Concentration
Mean
27.8
0.075
17.0

Percent Removal
N Mean N
6 74.0 13
4 29.0 14
3 18.0 19

Effluent
Concentration
Mean N
9.5
3.672
15.0

25
28
20

Notes :
1.
2.
PP = A01, A02
BP = TFP + ASP
(Ref. Appendix
6, Report No.
= B01, B02, B04, BOS, C01,
2)
C02,




         COS, C06, C09, C19, C20.

3.  N  = Number of plants reported.

-------
                            TABLE 6-4
           REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL PLANTS WITH CHEMICAL
                  ADDITION, AND TERTIARY PLANTS
Biological w/Chem
Addition


CD
CR
PB
HG
CU
NI
ZN
FE
MN
P-TOTAL
TKN
NH.
PHENOL
TOC
COD
SS
BOD
Note:
1. Bio]
Median/Mean
% Removal
0/0
67/70
38/39
33/34
80/75
75/62
79/72
84/84
39/39
80/78
51/57
45/56
82/82
79/79
87/78
83/78
93/86

Logical plant
Tertiary
No. of Plants Median/Mean

4
6
6
5
5
7
8
3
2
6
6
5
2
3
5
8
6

:s with chemical
% Removal
0/6
14/32
31/44
17/22
79/73
13/18
77/63
94/82
47/53
41/43
88/88
89/80
85/65
75/74
88/84
93/90
95/90

addition are
No. of Plants

5
7
10
4
9
5
7
8
5
6
2
9
4
3
10
11
11


2.
as follows:  B03, COS, C04, C14.
(Reference Appendix 6, Report No. 2).

Tertiary Plants are as follows:  C07, COS, CIO, D01, D02,
D06, D07.  (Reference Appendix 6, Report No. 2).
                                6-52

-------
                                TABLE 6-5
            REMOVAL IN BIOLOGICAL AND SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANTS
                 Biological Plants  (BP)
parameter

   CD
   CR
   PB
   HG
   CU
   NI
   ZN
   PHEN
   TOC
   COD
Percent
Removal
(mean)
15
43
37
35
58
19
55
46
71
69
72
Number
of Plants ( '

57
71
66
43
75
60
73
74
16
35
43
                                          Secondary Plants
Percent
Removal
(mean)
10
52
46
49
69
9
71
65
65
79
82
Number
of Plants

11
20
19
14
22
16
19
26
7
8
20
Notes;
   1.
BP = TFP + ASP =  B01, B02, B04, B05, C01, C02, COS, C06,
     C09, C19, C20 plants.
Secondary plants are those biological plants with effluent
BOD and SS equal to or less than 30 mg/1, and achieving 85%
or greater removal of both parameters for the data reported.
Number of biological plants which also reported BOD and SS
data.
                                   6-53

-------
     Correlation Analyses

     Correlation analyses were performed to determine the
degree of linear relationship for influent concentration ver-
sus percent removal, suspended solids removal versus percent
removal, influent pH versus percent removal, and influent
concentration versus effluent concentration for nine metal
parameters. Table 6-6 is a summary of the correlation coeffi-
cients obtained.  Of the four relationships investigated, only
influent concentration versus effluent concentration exhibited
a consistently high degree of correlation.  This relationship
was therefore pursued further in the regression analyses
which follow.

     The possibility of a linear relationship with log com-
binations for influent concentration versus percent removal,
suspended solids removal versus percent removal, and influent
pH versus percent removal for cadmium, chromium, and lead
was investigated in Table 6-7.   NO consistent high degree of
correlation was exhibited in this analysis.

     Regression Analyses

     Polynomial regression analyses were performed to deter-
mine the line of best fit for the reported data in the
relationship of influent concentration to effluent concen-
tration.  The regression equation along with the standard
error of estimate (Se), the standard deviation for effluent
concentrations reported (Ys), and the maximum and minimum
reported influent concentrations (X max, X min)  is presented
in Table  6-8 for nine total metals' parameters.   Three to
six degrees of polynomial regression were examined for each
parameter, with the selection of regression equations based
on the minimum reasonable Se/Ys  ratio.


     Taking into account the standard error of estimate, and
within the limits of influent concentrations X max, and X min,
the regression equations in Table 6-8- may be utilized to
estimate an effluent concentration from a given influent con-
centration, or conversely to estimate an influent concen-
tration from a given effluent limitation.
                             6-54

-------
                                                                  TABLE 6-6
                                                             CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
 Parameter



    CD

    CR

    FB

    HG

    CU

    NI

    ZN
ui   FE
ui
    MN
                   Influent Cone.
                   vs. % Removal
                                        SS % Removal
                                       vs, % Removal
                                       PH - Influent
                                       vs. % Removal
                             Influent Cone.
                             vs. Effluent Cone.
 PP     TFP    ASP      N
                    (PP/TFP/ASP)
-0.02   0.33   0.22   31/25/44

 0.19   0.38   0.22   26/48/54

 0.63   0.40   0.41   34/41/49

 0.03   0.22   0.26   21/20/34

-0.03   0.21  -0.01   44/49/63

 0.23   0.52  -0.14   28/32/49

 0.02   0.15   0.40   38/52/58

 0.45  -0.15   0.13   27/30/35

 0.06   0.31   0.12   16/21/19
                                  PP
        TFP    ASP      N         PP
                    (PP/TFP/ASP)
-0.25   0.06   0.27   17/28/30   0.19

-0.02   0.18   0.43   19/37/40   0.12

 0.03   0.07   0.17   21/32/41   0.17

 0.54   0.32   0.41   11/16/28  -0.69

-0.17   0.36   0.30   20/36/43  -0.27

-0.26  -0.04   0.06   19/26/36   0.01

 0.06   0.50   0.56   18/40/44   0.03

 0.56   0.56   0.56   12/25/32   0.07

-0.08   0.18   0.11   14/21/18  -0.32
TFP     ASP      N
             (PP/TFP/ASP)
-0.29   0.37   13/25/21

-0.07  -0.13   18/34/27

-0.41   0.07   17/30/32

 0.01   0.10    9/11/20

-0.13  -0.25   27/36/37

 0.05  -0.01   15/20/25

 0.11  -0.07   21/38/34

-0.02   0.33   22/29/33

 0.18  -0.29   12/20/16
PP     TFP    ASP      N
                   (PP/TFP/ASP)
0.97   0.83   1.00   31/35/44

0.98   0.81   0.84   36/48/54

0.58   0.67   0.77   34/41/49

0.89   1.00   0.76   21/20/34

0.97   0.87   0.67   44/49/63

0.94   0.65   1.00   28/32/49

0.96   0.93   0.61   38/52/58

0.67   0.99   0.57   27/30/35

0.92   0.85   0.95   16/21/19
    Notes:

    1.  PP  =

    2.  TFP =

    3.  ASP =

    4.  N
  A01, A02 plants (Ref. Appendix 6, Report No. 2)

  B01, B02, B04, BOS (Ref. Appendix 6, Report No. 2)

  C01, C02, COS, C06, C09, C19, C20 (Ref. Appendix 6, Report No.  2)

  Number of plants reported.

-------
                              TABLE 6-7
                      CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (LOG)

Parameter  Log Inf.  Cone.       Log Inf. Cone.     Influent Cone.
           vs. Log % Rem.       vs. % Removal      vs. Log % Rem.
           PP    TFP   ASP      PP   TFP   ASP    PP    TFP   ASP
     CD  -0.13 -0.001 0.33    -0.05  0.05  0.38  -0.04  0.24  0.23
     CR   0.62  0.50  0.62     0.45  0.61  0.67   0.28  0.22  0.20
     PB   0.51  0.38  0.32     0.59  0.58  0.43   0.43  0.21  0.30

           Log SS %  Rem.        Log SS % Rem.         SS % Rem.
           vs. Log % Rem.       vs. % Rem.          vs. Log % Rem.
           PP    TFP   ASP      PP   TFP   ASP    PP    TFP   ASP
    CD    -0.38  0.11  0.30    -0.23 0.08  0.26  -0.37  0.08  0.33
    CR     0.57  0.20  0.44     0.63 0.18  0.42   0.54  0.18  0.41
    PB     0.02 -0.10  0.09     0.09 0.06  0.17  -0.03 -0.10  0.05
           pH - Influent
           vs.  Log % Rem.
           PP   TFP   ASP
    CD    0.32  -0.36  0.27
    CF    0.35  -0.09 -0.11
    PB    0.34  -0.32 -0.02

    Notes:
    1.  PP  = A01,  A02 plants  (Ref. Appendix  6,  Report No.  2)
    2.  TFP = B01,  B02,  B04, BOS  (Ref.  Appendix  6,  Report No.  2)
    3.  ASP = C01,  C02,  COS, C06, C09,  C19, C20  (Ref.  Appendix 6,
             Report No. 2)
                                   6-56

-------
                                                                      TBHLE 6-8
                                                    REGRESSION ANALYSES - INFLUENT CONC.  (X)  vs.  EFFLUENT COHC. (If)
                        PRIMARY PIANTS (PP)
Parameter Regression Equation
S.
y
(JX3/1)
,CD
CR
PB
HG
CU
NI
ZN
en FE
01
MN
Y
Y
Y
y
y
Y
Y
Y
y
=0.39 + 0.99 x
= 14.6 + 0.69 x
2
= 16.3 + 0.73 x -0.001X
= -0.13 + 0.81 x
= -10.2 + 0.79 x
= -8.00 + 0.90 x
= -56.9 + 0.76 x
= 650-0. OIx+0.0002x2
-2(10"8)x3
= 3.97 + 0.82 x
1.7
90
54
0.7
73
108
194
713
37
7.3
442
79
1.4
289
312
685
1055
91
X,,
Max
30
3600
1040
5
1900
1700
4300
9000
370
-Vu
3
6
10
0.3
30
9
40
620
46
Notes:

1.  Ys = Standard deviation  (of effluent concentration reported)
2.  Se = Standard error of estimate
3.  X~j^  = Maximum reported  influent concentration
4.  xJjT  = Minimum reported  influent concentration
5.  PP1^ A01, A02 plants  (Ref.  Appendix 6,  Report No. 2)
6.  TFP = B01, B02, B04, BOS (Ref.  Appendix 6,  Report No. 2)
7.  ASP = C01, C02, COS, C06, C09,  C19,  C20 (Ref. Appendix 6, Report No. 2)

n
3
6
10
0.1
30
9
40
20
46
TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS (TFP)
Regression
Equation
Sp
Ys
X
X .
(pg/1) "ax ""•
Y
y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
= 5.08
= -26.2
= -5.33
= 0.09
= 64.9
= 14.9
= -10.7
= -829
= 5.85
+ 0.34 x
+ 0.53 x-2(10~5)x3
2
+ 0.53 X-O.OOOlx
+ 0.52 x
+ 0.15 x
+ 0.88x-0.0001x2
+ 0.51 x
+ 0.76 x
+ 0.60 x
-
215
147
0.1
148
63
165
1376
43
6
546
287
2.1
301
365
440
11894
81
(90
14000
7750
19
12000
8300
4800
85700
426
2
4
5
0.2
20
12
94
160
30
                                                                                                                                    ACTIVATES) SLBIBSE PIANTS (ASP)
                                                                                                                           Regression Equation
                                                                                                                                                           S_

Y
Y
Y
Y
y
Y
Y
y
Y

= 3.16 + 0.48 X
=-1.30 + 0.36 x
= 25.6 + 0.26 x
- 2.72-1.02X+O.01X
- 7.48 + 0.38 X
= -29.5 + x.
= 73.1 + 0.19 x
=-927-tr-2.15 x -0. 001 x2
+ 8 (10"8) X3
= 24.7 + 0.47 x

9
211
34
15
53
61
136
641
69
C^g/1)
295
389
52
34
71
5706
169
1200
215
	 wax —
4130
5600
930
300
620
40000
2200
7367
2020
	 Hin
3
5
5
0.2
30
9
60
250
35

-------
            APPENDIX 7
     ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
SECTION A - Introduction

SECTION B - Management of a Control Program

SECTION C - Legal Aspects of a Control Program

SECTION D - Monitoring

SECTION E - Pollutants which Interfere with
            Publicly Owned Treatment Works

SECTION F - Removal of Pollutants in Publicly
            Owned Treatment Works

-------
                    SECTION A - INTRODUCTION

               Reference:  Volume I - Section A
                           Volume II  - Appendices  1  &  2
A-l   Theories and Practices of Industrial Waste Treatment,
      Nemerow, Nelson Leonard,  Addison-Wesley Publishing
      Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, (1963).

      This book is divided into four sections:

      1.  The effects of industrial wastes on a receiving
          stream and how to treat wastes to protect the
          stream.

      2.  Theories of waste treatment including solids
          removal, neutralization, equalization and pro-
          portioning, and removal of dissolved organics and
          inorganics.
      3.  Engineering practice and actual case studies which
          consider economics, public opinion, personality
          differences, local laws or customs, and previous
          community experience to help the reader put theories
          into practice.
      4.  A condensed evaluation of the nature of major indus-
          trial wastes - their origin, characteristics and
          treatments.

A-2   Projects in the Industrial Pollution Control Division -
      December, 1974, Environmental Protection Technology
      Series, EPA 600/2-75-001 (March, 1975) .
      This book is a compilation of information sheets from
      all projects initiated since fiscal year  1967 (through
      fiscal year 1974).  Each sheet contains the objectives,
      statistical information,  and a brief description of one
      project.
A-3   "Combined Tannery and Municipal Waste Treatment -
      Gloversville - Johnstown, New York," Nemerow, N. and
      R. Armstrong, Proceedings of the 21st Industrial Waste
      Conference,  Purdue University, (1966),  p. 447.
      This article describes the stream survey used on the
      Cayadutta Creek to determine the waste treatment re-
      quired for a combined tannery-municipal waste discharge
      flow.  The sampling procedure used is indicated and the
      results are discussed.  Laboratory scale treatment tests
      were conducted on the waste stream, and the results and
      conclusions are presented.
                                7-1

-------
A-4   "Synthetic Organic Pesticides - An Evaluation of Their
      Persistence in Natural Water," Okey, Robert W. and
      Richard H. Bogan/  Proceedings of the llth Pacific
      Northwest Industrial Waste Conference, Corvallis, Oregon,
      Cir. No. 29, p. 222 (1963).
      Metabolism studies were carried out with the Warburg
      microrespirometer, and the conventional 5-day 20°C
      biochemical oxygen demand test to determine the persis-
      tence  (biodegradeability) of insecticides.  The work
      was carried out in two principal phases.  The first
      employed unacclimated activated sludge, and the second
      used acclimated activated sludge.  A discussion of the
      results is included.


A-5   "Toxicity of Chemicals in Paper Factory Effluents,"
      Norup, Bjarne, Water Research, Vol. 6, p. 1585 (1972)

      This article presents the results of a study to demon-
      strate that PCP is as toxic to fish as the dangerous,
      previously used slimecides containing mercury.  A dis-
      cussion of the experimental results is given.


A-6   "Treatment Studies of Combined Textile and Domestic
      Wastes," Lauria, Donald T. and Charles A. Willis,
      Proceedings of the 19th Industrial Waste Conference,
      Purdue University, (1964), p. 45.

      Pilot plant studies were conducted to evaluate a com-
      pletely mixed biological process to treat combined
      domestic and industrial wastes, produced in the town
      of Valdese, North Carolina.  The results of the pilot
      plant tests and conclusions are presented in this
      paper.


A-7   "Biomonitoring of Industrial Effluents," Jackson,
      Herbert W., and William A. Brungs, Jr., Proceedings
      of the 21st Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,
      (1966), p. 117.
      This paper describes a method to determine the toxicity
      of wastewater by using tanks containing aquatic life.
      The death of fish signal a deleterious change of the
      wastewater.  A schematic flow scheme of the system and
      operating procedures are given.
                               7-2

-------
A-8   "Isolation and Identification of Anaerobic and Faculta-
      tive Bacteria Present in the Digestion Process,"
      Burbank, N. C., Jr., et.al.. Proceedings of the 19th
      Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, (1964),
      p. 552.

      The purpose of this study was fivefold:
      1.  To improve the equipment devised to cultivate
          anaerobic bacteria.
      2.  To improve the techniques for identifying anaerobic
          bacteria.
      3.  To isolate and identify the anaerobic bacteria and
          facultative bacteria present in sewage sludge.
      4.  To correlate the population of the bacteria to the
          operation of digesters.
      5.  To isolate and identify anaerobic and facultative
          bacteria present in the digestion process of meat
          packing wastes.
      Results and conclusions are presented in this study.


A-9   "Industrial Wastewater Reclamation," Rambow, Carl A.,
      Proceedings of the 23rd Industrial Waste Conference,
      Purdue University, (1968), p. 1.
      The environmental and economic advantages of wastewater
      reclamation are presented in this paper.  Specific case
      histories are presented where wastewater reclamation has
      demonstrated distinct advantages over other methods of
      treatment.


A-10  "Decision Factors - Separate Industry or Joint Municipal
      Waste Treatment," Sanders, Francis A., Proceedings of
      the 23rd Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,
      (1968), p. 1021.
      This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages
      to both industry and communities of joint treatment.
      The factors which affect the decision of joint treatment,
      and the advantages of using a consulting engineer are also
      presented.
                               7-3

-------
A-ll  "Combined Waste Treatment at Grand Island, Nebraska,"
      Gibbs, W.R., and Henry Benjes, Jr., Proceedings of the
      22nd Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,
      (1967), p. 800.

      This paper discusses the development of the conceptual
      design of the new sewage collection and treatment system
      at Grand Island, Nebraska.  The detailed design and the
      operation of the treatment system are also presented.


A-12  Comparative Effects of Chemical Pretreatment on Carbon
      Adsorption, Westrick, James J., et al., presented at
      the Water Pollution Control Federation 47th Annual Con-
      ference, October 8-13, 1972.

      Three physical-chemical pilot plants were operated,
      utilizing three different chemical clarification schemes
      preceding filtration and carbon adsorption.  The purpose
      of the study was to compare effluent qualities from each
      plant.  A method of data analysis was developed to permit
      simplistic comparison of carbon dosages and costs.


A-13  "Phys/Chem or Biological:  Which Will You Choose?",
      Barth. E^E.,and Jesse M. Cohen, Water & Wastes Engineering,
      (Nov., 1974).


      The relative advantages and disadvantages of physical-
      chemical and biological wastewater treatment methods are
      discussed.  Examples are given where combinations of both
      methods can satisfy a particular wastewater requirement.


A-14  "The Treatment of Industrial Wastewater for Reuse -
      Chrysler Indianapolis Foundry," Balden, A.R., and
      Paul R. Erickson, Proceedings of the 25th Industrial
      Waste Conference, Purdue University, (1970), p. 62.

      This paper discusses the waste treatment plant designed
      for the Chrysler Indianapolis Foundry.   The waste treat-
      ment plant handles the waste stream produced by the gas
      scrubbers, which contain iron particles, evaporated oils
      and phenols.


A-15  "Wastewater Load Evaluated at a Multi-Product Organic
      Chemical Plant," Morrissey, A. J. and S. A. LaRocca,
      Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 117, No. 5, p. 173,(May, 1970)

      The wastewaters generated from a chemical plant are
      characterized and their effects on receiving waters are
      assessed.  The sampling and analysis program is also
      discussed.

                                7-4

-------
A-16  "Experience in the Treatment and Re-use of Industrial
      Waste Waters," Rennf Charles E., Proceedings of the 24th
      Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, (1969),
      p. 962.

      The re-use of industrial waste waters at the Black and
      Decker Manufacturing Company's Hampstead, Maryland plant
      were discussed.  A detailed description of the collection
      pond is given, and a discussion of the operating problems
      faced is also contained.
A-17  "Water Conservation and Reuse by Industry," Irvine,
      Robert L., Jr. and William B. Davis, Proceedings of the
      24th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University (1969),
      p. 450.

      The reasons why industry has not implemented in-plant
      water management programs for water conservation and
      reuse are discussed in this paper.  The first part of
      the paper disputes these reasons; the second part dis-
      cusses how the concepts of conservation and reuse aid
      in overall plant performance. The third part indicates
      how the efficiency of biological waste treatment facili-
      ties can be increased.
A-18  "Rough Days Ahead for Industry, but New Methods Gain,"
      Heckroth, Charles W., Water and Wastes Engineering,
      (January, 1972), p. A2.

      This article briefly discusses:
      1.  The W.P.C.F. meeting held in San Francisco in 1971,
          including EPA viewpoints regarding latest treatment
          technology.
      2.  Studies presented at the WPCF meeting on how five
          towns are handling both municipal and industrial
          wastewaters.

      3.  Advances in pulp and paper, food, plating, plastic,
          and mining waste treatment systems.


A-19  "Detection of Industrial Wastes in Municipal Systems,"
      Delaney,  Ladin, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation,  Vol. 42, No. 4, p. 645,  (April, 1970).

      This article briefly discusses some basic procedures for
      detecting illegal discharges to sewerage systems.   Speci-
      fic case histories are presented to illustrate each of
      the author's suggestions.
                              7-5

-------
A-20  "Acceptable Methods for the Utilization or Disposal of
      Sludges/"  U.S. E.P.A., 430/9-75, a preliminary draft
      of a technical bulletin, Supplement to Federal Guidelines;
      Design, Operation and Maintenance of Wastewater Treatment
      Facilities, 26 pp.
      This bulletin discusses the factors important to the
      environmental acceptability of a particular sludge manage-
      ment system.  The environmental assessment procedure to
      determine the acceptability of sludge disposal at a specific
      site is also discussed.  Information on the constraints of
      various sludge disposal methods is presented.


A-21  "Wastewater Treatment for Small Communities," Part I,
      Tchobanoglous, George, Public Works, Vol. 105, No. 7.
      p. 58, (July, 1974).

      This article defines  some of the general problems associ-
      ated with small waste treatment plants.  Alternate treat-
      ment processes and design considerations for small plants
      are discussed.  Economic comparisons between treatment
      processes are also given.


A-22  "Wastewater Treatment for Small Communities," Part 2f
      Tchobanoglous, George, Public Works, Vol. 105, No. 8,
      p. 58, (August, 1974).

      Design considerations for small activated sludge systems
      are discussed.  An economic evaluation of alternative
      processes is considered and illustrated.  Capital and
      operating costs for various systems are shown.


A-23  Industrial Wastes, Rudolfs, W., Reinhold Publishing
      Corporation, New York, N. Y. (1953), 497 pp.

      Brief descriptions of industrial waste-producing processes,
      sources of wastes, recovery and remedial measures, quan-
      tities and characteristics of the wastes, methods of treat-
      ment and the effects  of the wastes on domestic sewage
      treatment processes are presented.  Various contributors
      presented waste treatment fundamentals from the physical,
      chemical,  biochemical and engineering viewpoints.
                               7-6

-------
A-24  "Measuring Open Channel Wastewater Flows," Blois, R.S.,
      Pollution Engr., Vol.  19, No. 6, P-  20,  (Nov.-Dec.,  1973).

      The use of weirs to measure  flow rates is discussed.
      Some basic designs are given, and simple flow recording
      methods are presented.


A-25  "Analytical Parameters of Petrochemical and Refinery
      Wastewaters," Ford, D.L., et. al., Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 43, No. 8, p. 1712,
      (August, 1971) .

      This paper discusses the tests  for BOD, COD, TOD, and
      TOC, and shows how these tests  can be used to determine
      wastewater characterization  and wastewater treatability.


A-26  "Unique System Solves  Plastic Problem," Water and Wastes
      Engineering, Vol. 10,  No. 5, p. C-20,  (May, 1973).

      This article briefly discusses  the method used by the
      Marbon Chemical Division of  Borg-Warner Corporation  to
      determine whether a waste stream was biodegradeable.
      The analysis also produced the  design parameters for
      the full scale plant.


A-27  "A Method for the Measurement of the Radioactive Content
      of Wastewater," Haughey, Francis J.  and Raymond M. Manganelli,
      Journal of the Water Pollution  Control Federation, Vol. 36,
      No. 1, p. 88,  (January, 1964).

      A method to measure the radioactive  content of wastewater
      is presented in this article.   The method accounts for
      the relationship between radioactivity and the various
      sewage solids fractions.


A-28  "Municipal Wastewater  Treatment Plant Instrumentation,"
      Babcock, Russel H., Water and Wastes Engineering, Vol. 5,
      No. 8, p. 47,  (August, 1968).

      This article briefly discusses  instruments and controls
      that can be used in a  sewage plant.
                                7-7

-------
A-29  "Surveillance in Water Quality Management," Ward, Robert C.,
      et al.  Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 45, No. 10, p. 2081, (October, 1973).

      This paper reviews the strategy developments in water
      quality surveillance that have occurred in this country.
      The paper also discusses the importance of data to
      successful implementation of these strategies and notes
      failures in the utilization of the data.  Remedies for
      these situations are also proposed.


A-30  Manual on Disposal of Refinery Wastes, Volume on Liquid
      Wastes, American Petroleum Institute,  1801 K Street, N.W.,
      Washington, B.C. (1969).

      This document is a comprehensive manual on the disposal
      and treatment of petroleum refinery wastes.  Included is
      information on the removal and reduction of pollutants,
      collection and treatment of wastewaters, monitoring, and
      solubility and toxicity data.


A-31  Principles of Industrial Waste Treatment,  Gurnham, C. Fred,
      John Wiley & Sons,  Inc., New York, New York, (1955), 399 pp.

      This book examines the problem of industrial wastes from
      the unit operations viewpoint.  Operations and processes
      used to treat wastes before discharge include physical,
      chemical and biological pretreatment.   Sources of wastes,
      their pollutional effects and a review of major industry
      problems are covered.


A-32  Industrial Waste Treatment Practice, Eldridge,  E. P.,
      McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York,  New York, (1942),
      401 pp.

      Information and data pertaining to the design and operation
      of treatment works for industrial wastewaters are given.
      Wastewaters from important industries are characterized.

A-33  Choosing the Optimum Financial Strategy, Upgrading Meat
      Packing Facilities  to Reduce Pollution, U.S. EPA Technology
      Transfer Seminar Publication, October, 1973, 38 pp.

      This booklet presents various strategies for financing
      pollution control equipment.  The areas covered include
      depreciation,  State and other financing, tax incentives,
      and comparisons between on-site and municipal treatment.
      Three hypothetical  meat packing facilities are considered
      as examples, and their method of optimizing costs are detailed.
                              7-8

-------
A-34  In Process Modifications and Pretreatment, Upgrading Meat
      Packing Facilities to Reduce Pollution, U.S. EPA, October,
      1973, 90 pp.

      Methods of reducing pollution from meat packing plants are
      described in this report.  Both in-plant modifications and
      pretreatment of wastes are discussed.  Two case histories
      are presented, with operating results.  A discussion of
      odor problems and control is also included.

A-35  Waste Treatment, Upgrading Meat Packing Facilities to
      Reduce Pollution, U.S. EPA, October, 1973, 64 pp.

      This booklet describes the use of biological wastewater
      treatment methods to treat waste from meat packing plants.
      The various biological systems are indicated, and procedures
      for planning, designing and constructing such facilities
      are recommended.  Proper operation and maintenance pro-
      cedures are presented, and case histories of several plants
      utilizing biological treatment are detailed.

A-36  In-Plant Control of Pollution, Upgrading Textile Operations
      to Reduce Pollution, U.S. EPA Technology Transfer Seminar
      Publication, October, 1974, 118 pp.

      This study surveys the wastes produced by textile operations
      and indicates various treatment methods to reduce and eliminate
      pollution.  Examples of flow reduction, water reuse and waste
      segregation are presented.  Different pretreatment techniques
      are also discussed.

A-37  Wastewater Treatment Systems, Upgrading Textile Operations
      to Reduce Pollution, U.S. EPA, October, 1974, 45 pp.

      Experience with using biological treatment systems and
      activated carbon to treat textile wastes is described in
      this bulletin.  The sources and strengths of wastewaters
      from various textile manufacturing processes are described,
      and case histories from several plants are indicated.

A-38  In-Process Pollution Abatement, Upgrading Metal Finishing
      Facilities to Reduce Pollution, U.S. EPA, July, 1973, 69 pp.

      This booklet describes generally the metal finishing industry
      and techniques that can be used to control pollution.  One
      chapter deals specifically with water pollution, and discusses
      both conservation and treatment.
                              7-9

-------
A-39  Waste Treatment, Upgrading Metal Finishing Facilities to
      Reduce Pollution. U.S. EPA, July, 1973, 47 pp.

      Methods of treating metal-finishing wastes are discussed
      in this document.  Methods of process solution regeneration
      and recovery are indicated and commonly used waste treatment
      systems are also described.  A chapter on solid-liquid
      separation, solids concentration and sludge disposal is
      included.  The economic considerations of waste treatment
      are outlined.

A-40  Upgrading Poultry Processing Facilities to Reduce Pollution,
      Volume 1 - In-Process Pollution Abatement, Volume 2 - Pre-
      treatment of Poultry Processing Wastes, Volume 3 - Waste
      Treatment, U.S. EPA Technology Transfer Seminar Publication,
      June, 1973.

      This three volume set of booklets describes methods of
      reducing and treating the wastes from poultry processing
      operations.  The first volume describes the industry and
      its wastes,and presents a case study of process and equip-
      ment modifications whichwere successful in reducing waste-
      water.  The second booklet discusses unit operations which
      may be used as pretreatment of poultry wastes.  The relation-
      ship of municipal ordinances and these wastes is also indi-
      cated.  The third volume discusses  complete waste treatment,
      including planning, selection and operating suggestions.  A
      case history of a waste treatment plant for poultry wastes
      is included.

A-41  Technical Aspects of Joint Waste Treatment^ Municipal/Industrial.
      Litsky, W., et.al.  editor. Proceedings of an Institute Held
      at Framingham, Massachusetts,  March 5, 1969,  Technical Guidance
      Center for Industrial Water Pollution Control (University of
      Massachusetts) and Associated Industries of Massachusetts.

      This document is a collection of papers dealing with the
      organizational, managerial and technical aspects of joint
      industry/municipal sewage treatment.  Some of the subjects
      included are economic studies of joint treatment and case
      histories of combined treatment.  15 technical papers are
      included.


      For additional information pertaining to this section,
      please refer to the following articles:

                              E-31
                              E-66
                              E-73

                              D-112


                              7-10

-------
                  SECTION B - MANAGEMENT OF A
                              CONTROL PROGRAM

                  Reference:  Volume  I - Section B
B-l   "Delaware System Moves Ahead,"  Webber, Paul J. and
      Robert C. Kausch, Water and Wastes Engineering, p. 44,
      January, 1972.

      This article describes how the Delaware River Basin
      Commission set up a regional waste treatment system
      in cooperation with the local municipalities and in-
      dustries.  The article describes the history, starting
      from the original agreement, through the pilot plant
      to the beginning of the final plans.


B-2   "Classifying Industrial Wastewater Emissions,"
      Williams, Rodney T., Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 121,
      No. 7, p. 86, (July, 1974).

      This article describes the classification methodology
      of the East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland,
      California to categorize the industrial users of their
      system.  The article describes the classification pro-
      gram, the rate  structure, the regulations and permits
      used.
B-3   "Pollution Abatement Thru Government-Corporate
      Cooperation,"  Reed, Paul E., Water and Sewage Works,
      Vol. 121, No. 9, p. 104, (September, 1974).

      This article describes the managerial,  fiscal, and
      political aspects of the Joint Treatment Facility be-
      tween the Borough of Naugatuck, Connecticut  and Uni-
      royal,  Inc.  The Naugatuck Treatment Company,  which is
      owned by Uniroyal, Inc. will run the plant.   The
      financial considerations of this arrangement are
      described.
B-4   "Chicago Industrial Waste Surcharge Ordinance,"
      Anderson,  Norval E. and Ben Sosewitz,  Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 43,  No. 8,
      p.  1591, (August,  1971).

      This article first describes in detail the surcharge
      program, and then includes a copy of the ordinance
      used by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater
      Chicago.
                                7-11

-------
B-5   "The Joint Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment
      Approach - A Case History," Hickman, Paul T., Presented
      at the Water Pollution Control Federation Meeting, Denver,
      Colorado, October 9, 1974.

      This paper presents a case history of the Joint Municipal
      and Industrial approach to water pollution control, prac-
      ticed in the City of Springfield, Missouri.  The article
      describes the collection system, treatment plants, and
      the history of the surcharge system.


B-6   "All Parties Can Benefit from Joint Municipal-Industry
      Treatment," Byrd, J. Floyd, Water and Sewage Works,
      Volume 116, No. 11, p. IW 14, November, 1969.

      This article lists the advantages of joint treatment as
      opposed to separate industrial treatment.  A number of
      specific cases are presented to support these claims.
      Factors affecting the development of a good ordinance
      are also listed.


B-7   "Methods of Charging for the Reception, Treatment and
      Disposal of Toxic Wastes," Harkness, N.,  Water Pollution
      Control, Vol. 69,(1970).

      This article presents methods of calculating the costs
      of (and the charges for) treating toxic wastes mixed
      with sewage.  Different methods are presented for differ-
      ent types of wastes to be treated.


B-8   "Technical Bases for Assessing the Strength, Charges for
      Treatment and Treatability of Trade Wastes," Simpson, James R.,
      Water Pollution Control, Vol. 66, No. 2,  p. 165,(1967).

      This article presents a detailed methodology, with formulas,
      for determining the strength, and charges for treatment of
      industrial wastes in publicly owned treatment works.


B-9   "Rx for Industry:  Regionalism," Traguair,  William C.,
      Water and Wastes Engineering, May,  1973.

      This article states the reasons for choosing joint treat-
      ment in Concord,  N.H.,  and describes the treatment system
      used.
                                 7-12

-------
B-10  "Cooperation Helps Erie," Waytenick, Robert J.f Water
      and Wastes Engineering/ September, 1973, p. 76.

      This.article describes the agreement between Erie,
      Pennsylvania and the Hammermill Paper Company for a
      joint waste treatment system.  A description of the
      treatment plant is also presented.


B-ll  "Estimating Industrial Water Pollution in Small Regions,"
      Greenberg, Michael R. and Rae Zimmerman, Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 45, No. 3, p. 462,
     (March, 1973).

      This article describes the methodology used to develop
      a model for estimating the volume and quality of indus-
      trial effluents.  The model was developed for the New York
      Metropolitan region, consisting of 21 counties.


B-12  Enforcement Management System Users Guide, U.S. E.P.A.,
      NTIS No. PB 210 716, 210 pp., September, 1972.

      The Enforcement Management System  (EMS) was developed
      to aid our pollution control agencies handle data arising
      from most agency enforcement activities.  The system
      emphasizes management control of enforcement functions
      and establishes standardized methods of handling data.


B-13  "Industrial Waste Charges," Seagraves, James A., Journal
      of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE Vol. 99,
      No. EE 6, p. 873,(December, 1973).

      The controversial issues involved in establishing equitable
      industrial charges for wastewater discharges are discussed.
      Included are several examples of existing surcharge methods.


B-14  "Combined Treatment," Byrd, J. P., Proceedings of the 16th
      Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, (1961), p. 92,

      The advantages and limitations of combined municipal-indus-
      trial sewage treatment are discussed.  Several methods of
      recovering costs are also reviewed.
                             7-13

-------
B-15  "Potential of Large Metropolitan Sewers for Disposal of
      Industrial Wastes," Gibbs, Charles V. and Ray H. Bothel,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol 37,
      No. 10, p. 1417,(October, 1965).

      The advantages to industry of locating in a large metro-
      politan area to benefit from joint treatment of industrial
      wastes are discussed.  The discussion includes the relative
      financial, personnel,technical and treatability aspects of
      sewage treatment.


B-16  "Development of an Industrial Waste Study for a Munici-
      pality," Meers, J. E., et al, Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 36, No. 12, p. 1501,
      (December, 1964).

      A survey was conducted to develop a comprehensive sewerage
      plan for the Bloom Township Sanitary District, Chicago
      Heights, Illinois.  The objectives of the study were to
      identify wastewater constituents that interfere with treat-
      ment works, to determine the extent that the present facili-
      ties could be utilized, and to evaluate the present sewer
      use ordinance.


B-17  "An Industry Approach to Pollution Abatement," Rocheleau, R.F.,
      and E. F. Taylor,  Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 36, No. 10, p. 1185,(October, 1964).

      The factors necessary to implement an effective industrial
      waste management program are discussed.  Control methods
      and techniques are also described and economic considerations
      are stressed.


B-18  "New Concepts in Industrial Sewage Collection," Munson,
      Edward D., Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 36, No. 9, p. 1146,(September, 1964).

      This article discusses the segregation of industrial wastes
      and their conveyance through open channels as a means  of
      wastewater collection and treatment.   The Bayport,  Texas
      industrial sewerage plan is also described.
                               7-14

-------
B-19  "Combined Treatment - A Coast to Coast Coverage,"
      Byrd, j. Floyd, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation. Vol. 39, No. 4, p. 601,(April, 1967).

      This article discusses factors that can contribute to
      the failure or success of combined industrial and muni-
      cipal wastewater treatment systems.  The advantages of
      performance and cost of joint treatment are examined.
      Precautions necessary to assure success are also outlined.


B-20  "Combined Treatment at Kalamazoo - Cooperation in Action,"
      Swets, Donald H., et al, Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 39,  No. 2, p. 204,(February, 1967).

      This article describes the steps which led to the esta-
      blishment of a government and industry joint wastewater
      treatment system.  Some of the philosophies that shaped
      the venture, and how the program evolved and was imple-
      mented are discussed.  Points of view are presented by
      representatives of each of the affected institutions:
      public works director, industry, city and state.


B-21  "Evaluation Factors for Joint Waste Treatment," Reiter, W.M.,
      Pollution Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 12, p. 38,(December, 1974)

      This article contains a general discussion on the factor's
      that need to be considered in a joint municipal-industrial
      waste treatment program.  Factors include waste treatability;
      federal, state and municipal regulations; pretreatment re-
      quirements; and cost and extent of monitoring and surveil-
      lance.
B-22  "Planning and Execution of Industrial Waste Treatability
      Studies," Westfield,  James D.,  et al, Proceedings of the
      26th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,(1971),
      p.  832.

      This paper presents an approach to planning a treatability
      study.   The approach defines a  framework which can be used
      to  plan  and conduct any industrial waste treatability eval-
      uation.   Treatment processes can then be selected to satisfy
      required removals.
                              7-15

-------
B-23  "The Foundation of Successful Industrial Waste Disposal
      to Municipal Sewage Works," Wisely, W.H., Proceedings of
      the 5th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University,
      (1949), p. 360.

      Factors leading to successful joint (municipal and indus-
      trial) sewage treatment relationships are discussed.
      Some of the common causes for breakdown in these arrange-
      ments are outlined.


B-24  "Management of Industrial Effluent Disposal in Britain,"
      Jackson, C. J., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 41, No. 12, p. 2020,(December, 1969).

      This article discusses the wastewater treatment and
      disposal factors to be considered in making industrial
      planning decisions.  Factors discussed include treatment
      and disposal methods, pretreatment requirements,  and
      costs.
B-25  "Planning Industrial Waste Treatment,"  Black,  H.  H.,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control  Federation,  Vol. 41,
      No. 7, p. 1277,(July,1969).

      This article presents those  concepts that may serve as.
      guidelines for those engaged in the planning of industrial
      waste treatment.   Factors that must be  considered for ef-
      fective planning  are discussed, including evaluation of
      waste load, and receiving waters,  treatment requirements,
      development of design criteria, and monitoring.


B-26  "Treatment of Mixed Industrial Wastes at Bayport's  Indus-
      trial Complex", Meriwether,  George B.,  Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation,  Vol. 41,  No.  3, p.  440,
     (March, 1969).

      The central wastewater collection and treatment system for
      the Bayport industrial complex is described.   Pretreatment
      requirements, management of  the program and the system of
      user charges are  also discussed.
                               7-16

-------
B-27  "How to Manage Industrial Inflow," Williams, R. T. and
      R.  J. Dolan, Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 121, No. 12,
      p.  46,(December, 1974).

      The development of a wastewater management plan for the
      East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, California
      is  reported.  The discussion includes ordinance develop-
      ment, sampling program, service charges,  and permit programs,


B-28  "The Advantages of Industrial-Municipal Wastewater Treat-
      ment," Watson, K. S., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 42, No. 2, p. 209,(February, 1970).

      This article discusses the advantages of joint treatment,
      and indicates the different approaches that a sanitary
      district can take.  Case histories are discussed,  such as
      the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Allegheny
      County, and the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater
      Chicago.  An equitable finance formula is also discussed.


B-29  "Industrial Effluents:  Problems of Recovering Costs,"
      Lewin, V. H., Discharge of Industrial Effluents to Municipal
      Sewerage Systems, p. 77, Proceedings of Symposium of the
      Institute of Water Pollution Control, London.
      November 29-30, 1971.

      This paper discusses several systems now in use in England
      and Wales to recover the costs of industrial sewage treat-
      ment.  Some of the problems involved are also discussed.
      The experiences of the City of Oxford, which has been using
      a Mogden-type formula for cost recovery,  are reported.


B-30  "Methods of Charging for the Treatment and Disposal of
      Industrial Effluents in Municipal Sewerage Systems,"
      Simpson, J. R. and G. A. Truesdale, Discharge of Indus-
      trial Effluents to Municipal Sewerage Systems, p.  65,
      Proceedings of Symposium of the Institute of Water Pollu-
      tion Control, London.  November 29-30, 1971.

      A method to calculate user charges for industrial effluents
      is  presented.  A charge for both the capital and operating
      costs is recommended.  Calculations for capital costs are
      based upon sewerage system design; operating costs are
      based upon quantity and character of flow.  Formulae to
      make these calculations,and several examples of their
      implementation are also included.
                                7-17

-------
B-31  "Present Industrial Effluent Legislation and Its Short-
      Comings," Fisher, N. S., Discharge of Industrial Effluents
      to Municipal Sewerage Systems,  p. 14, Proceedings of
      Symposium of the Institute of Water Pollution Control,
      London, November 29-30, 1971.

      This paper reviews British law pertaining to the dis-
      charge of trade effluents and comments on some of the
      shortcomings of its provisions.  Several views are pre-
      sented on where the responsibility for water quality
      control should be.
B-32  "Effects of the 1972 Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
      on Industrial Waste Monitoring in Anondaga County,"
      Ott, Randy, et al,  presented at the New York Water  Pollution
      Control Association, January,  1974.

      An extensive analysis program was conducted to estimate
      industry's proportionate cost of wastewater treatment.   A
      discussion of cost  of such a program,  data collection,
      and results of the  program are presented in this paper.


      For additional information pertaining to this section,
      please refer to the following articles:


                   D-3              E-15
                   D-12             E-16
                   D-29             E-28
                   D-34
                   D-42
                   D-76
                   D-114
                            7-18

-------
                   SECTION C - LEGAL ASPECTS
                               OF A CONTROL PROGRAM

                   Reference:  Volume  I - Section C
C-l   "Wastes May Not Be a Treat for Pretreatment," Chemical
      Week, October 9, 1974.

      This article discusses the disadvantages of pretreatment
      for organic chemical manufacturing plants.  The disad-
      vantages discussed include economic, technical and
      political considerations.
C-2   "The Sewer Ordinance Basics," Calver, Robert and
      Trevor Saxon, Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 121, No. 8,
      p. 54, (August, 1974 ).

      The fundamentals of wastewater control are discussed,
      including the need for an industrial sewer ordinance.
      Recommendation for planning and designing the ordinance
      are also included and user charge formulas are presented,
C-3   "Regulations and Service Charges for the Treatment of
      Industrial Wastewater in Federally Assisted Public
      Facilities," Gutierrez, A. F., Paper presented to the
      Southeast Section Convention of the American Waterworks
      Association. San Antonio, Texas, October 11, 1971.

      The importance of adopting a community ordinance to control
      and regulate the use of public wastewater facilities,  to
      protect these facilities and to provide an equitable
      system of cost recovery is discussed.  Included is a cost
      recovery formula and several examples which illustrate its
      use.
C-4   "Energetic Enforcement of Industrial Waste Ordinances,"
      Lavin,  Allen,  Proceedings of the 23rd Industrial Waste
      Conference,  Purdue University,  p. 550,  1968.

      This paper discusses why industrial waste ordinances have
      been failing,  and how the Metropolitan Sanitary District
      of Greater Chicago is enforcing theirs.  The author also
      presents arguments for strict enforcement of industrial
      waste ordinances.
                                 7-19

-------
C-5   "Municipal Waste Ordinances - The Views of Industry,"
      Byrd, J. F., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 37. No. 12, p. 1635, (December, 1965 ).

      The views of industry are presented on what constitutes
      a good municipal waste ordinance.  The discussion centers
      on those aspects of the model ordinance, presented in
      Water Pollution Control Federation's Manual of Practice #3,
      "Regulation of Sewer Use,", which are of interest to
      industry.


C-6   Development of a State Effluent Charge System,   U.S.
      E.P.A., NTIS No. PB 210 711, 215 pp., February, 1972.

      The Vermont permit and fee system that has been developed
      and implemented is described in this book.  Various methods
      of fee calculations are discussed and the reasons for se-
      lection of one are set forth.  The following issues are
      discussed:  incentive effect on dischargers,  the relation
      of dischargers to instream economic damages,  equity,  con-
      stitutionality, economic efficiency, technical and adminis-
      trative feasibility and income potential.


C-7   "Effluent Guidlines - Industry's Point of View," Elkin,
      Harold F, et al, Pollution Engineering,  Vol.  20, No.  6,
      p. 18, (November-December,  1974 ).

      This article examines industry's view toward'the develop-
      ment and use of effluent guidelines for  industrial dis-
      charges to navigable waters.  It presents a case history
      of the development of petroleum refining discharge guide-
      lines .
C-8   "Chicago vs. Industry Polluters," Lue-Hing,  Cecil,  and
      Earl W. Knight, Water and Wastes Engineering,  p. 71,
      September,  1973.

      This article briefly discusses the water pollution problem
      caused by industries discharging to the Metropolitan Sani-
      tary District (MSD)  of Greater Chicago and the actions
      taken by the MSD to correct these problems.
                            7-20

-------
C-9   "Some Experiences in the Pretreatment of Industrial
      Waste Going to the Municipal Sewer System of Philadelphia,"
      Reich, j. s.. Proceedings of the 10th Industrial Waste
      Conference, Purdue University, (1955),  p.  244.

      The pretreatment and disposal practices of several types
      of industries discharging to the Philadelphia treatment
      system are discussed.  The city has established a set of
      criteria upon which pretreatment requirements are based.


C-10  "Control of Industrial Wastes Entering Municipal Sewers,"
      Carpenter, Carl B., Proceedings of the llth Industrial
      Waste Conference, Purdue University,  (1956),  p. 1.

      This article presents the experiences of the Hammond
      Sanitary District's monitoring and ordinance program.
      The article describes its monitoring system to catch
      illegal dischargers.  Case histories dealing with problem
      wastes from industry are also presented.  These case
      histories deal with such items as waste streams con-
      taining spent pickle liquors,oil spills, and sulfuric
      acid plant wastes.


C-ll  "Establishing Industrial Waste Ordinances," Taylor,  Dean M.,
      Proceedings of the 10th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue
      University, (1955), p.  255.

      This paper discusses the basic requirements which should
      be recognized in preparation of an industrial wastewater
      ordinance.  Factors to be considered include a clear
      definition of terms, conditions for usage of the public
      sewers,  prohibitions of specific substances,  monitoring
      requirements, penalties and charges.


C-12  "Experience with Waste Ordinance and Surcharges at
      Greensboro, North Carolina," Shaw,  Ray E.,  Jr., Journal
      of the Water Pollution Control Federation,  Vol. 42,  No. 1,
      p. 44,(January,1970.)

      This article is  a case history of how an ordinance  system
      was developed in the City of Greensboro, North Carolina.
      The article includes discussions on the ordinance struc-
      ture,  the method of establishing the surcharge, the
      sampling procedures, and presents several  case histories.
                              7-21

-------
C-13  "Factors in the Development of an Industrial Waste
      Ordinance," Hamlin, W.G., Proceedings of the 9th Indus-
      trial Waste Conference,  Purdue University, (1954), p. 14.

      This article discusses some of the many factors which
      must be considered before drafting an adequate industrial
      waste ordinance.  Factors to be considered include:
      statement of purpose and policy, definition of terms,
      definition of public sewer usage, prohibition of specific
      substances, conditions of industrial waste discharge,
      industrial waste charges, refunds, penalties and validation.


C-14  "Pretreatment Requirements for Industrial Waste Discharged
      to Municipal Treatment Systems," Escher,  Dennis E. and
      Andrew J. Kicinski, presented at the ASCE-EED Specialty
      Conference on Environmental Engineering p^g^arr"hf n^v^lnp-
      ment and Design, Pennsylvania State University. July, 1974.

      This paper considers the subject of developing criteria
      for the pretreatment of industrial wastes prior to their
      discharge into municipal sewage treatment systems. The
      article presents a detailed discussion of the 1972 amend-
      ments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, including
      requirements and interpretations.  The paper also dis-
      cusses some recommended effluent limitations for pretreat-
      ment.
C-15  "Consents and Agreements,"  Finch,  John,  Discharge of
      Industrial Effluents  to Municipal  Sewerage Systems,
      Proceedings of Symposium of The Institute of Water
      Pollution Control,  London,  p.  23,  November 29-30, 1971.

      Legal aspects of implementing  the  Acts of Parliament
      pertaining to wastewater treatment are discussed. In-
      cluded are several  model agreements,  which contain regu-
      lations establishing  effluent  limitations,  financial
      arrangements and management control programs.
                              7-22

-------
C-16  "MOP No. 3  Regulation of Sewer Use", Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation.

      Part I - Vol. 45, No. 9, p. 1985 (September, 1973)
      Part II- Vol. 45,No. 10, p. 2216 (October, 1973)


      This manual of practice has been prepared to assist
      municipalities regulate, and control wastewater: facili*-
      ties.  The importance of controlling usage is empha-
      sized.  The fundamental requirements of the regulations
      that are essential to proper control are indicated.
      The effects of inadequate control, and considerations
      in developing a code and ordinance, are also discussed.
      The second part of this manual presents and discusses
      a model ordinance for wastewater control.  Charges for
      wastewater service are indicated and recommendations
      to implement the ordinance are made.


C-17  "Heavy Metals in Digesters:  Failure and Cure,"  Regan,
      Terry M. and Mercer Peters, Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 42, No. 10, p. 1832 (October, 1970),
      also reported in Proceedings of the 25th Industrial Waste
      Conference, Purdue University, (1970), p. 645.

      This article reports the action taken after primary
      digester failure at the Lexington, Kentucky treatment
      plant.  The failure was caused by excessive metal con-
      centrations.  The costs incurred from this failure are
      also presented.  The waste sampling system that  was sub-
      sequently instituted is described.


C-18  Metropolitan Sewerage System, Seattle, Washington.
      Resolution No. 2158.  Regarding the Control and  Disposal
      of Industrial Waste into the Metropolitan Sewerage
      System, July, 1974.
                                7,-23

-------
C-19  City of Atlanta, Georgia

      a.  Sewer Service Charges and Industrial Waste Sur-
          charges, 1971.

      b.  Standards of Acceptability of Industrial or Trade
          Wastes for Admission into Sewers of the City of
          Atlanta, Georgia, 1971.


C-20  Metropolitan Sewer Board, St. Paul, Minnesota, Sewage
      and Waste Control Rules and Regulations for the Metro-
      politan Disposal System, December 1, 1971.


C-21  The Sanitary District of Rockford, Illinois, Ordinance
      No. 309, Pollutant Discharge Control Ordinance of the
      Sanitary District of Rockford, 1974.


C-22  City of New York, New York

      a.  Rules and Regulations Relating to the Use of the
          Public Sewer System for the Discharge of Sewage,
          Industrial Waste and Other Wastes,  Including Sur-
          charges and Penalties.

      b.  Amendment to the Administrative Code,  Section
          687-1.0 Industrial Waste; Sewer Surcharges.


C-23  City of Houston, Texas,  Disposal of Industrial Waste
      Through City Sewer System,  1974.


C-24  Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater  Cincinnati,
      Cincinnati,  Ohio, Rules  and Regulations,  December 4, 1968,
                             7-24

-------
C-25  Commission of Jefferson County, Jefferson County, Alabama

      a.  Rules and Regulations for Discharge of Waste Into
          Sanitary Sewerage System, April, 1970.
      b.  Resolution for Industrial Waste Surcharge, September, 1972.


C-26  The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, St. Louis, Missouri

      a.  Ordinance No. 2289, May, 1972
      b.  Ordinance No. 2412, March, 1973

      c.  Ordinance No. 2444, June, 1973


C-27  City of Akron, Ohio, Ordinance No. 499, Industrial Wastes;
      Regulations for Non-acceptable, 1963.


C-2€  City of Dallas, Texas, Industrial Waste Ordinance, 1969.


C-29  City of Topeka, Kansas, Ordinance No. 13664, 1975.


C-30  City of Fitchburg, Massachusetts, The Discharge of Waters
      and Wastes Into the Public Sewer System.


C-31  Westchester County Environmental Facilities, Westchester
      County, New York, Sewer Ordinance No. 1, Rules, Regulations
      and Ordinances Governing the Discharge of Sewage, Industrial1
      Wastes or Other Wastes.


C-32  City of Olean, New York, Sewer Use Ordinance, September, 1968.


C-33  Township of Towamencin, Pennsylvania, Rates, Rules and
      Regulations, April, 1967.


C-34  City of Muncie, Indiana, Muncie Code of Ordinances? Laws
      Pertaining to This Division, 1954-1967.
                             7-25

-------
C-35  Sewer Utility of the City of Boulder, Boulder, Colorado,
      Ordinance No. 3836.


C-36  Environmental Improvement Agency of New Mexico, Santa Fe,
      New Mexico, Industrial Waste Ordinance, a model ordinance,


C-37  County of Onondaga, Syracuse, New York, Rules and Regu-
      lations Relating to the Use of the Public Sewer System,
      1972.
C-38  The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago,
      Chicago, Illinois
      a.  Sewage and Waste Control Ordinance as Amended, 1972.

      b.  Sewer Permit Ordinance, 1969, Amended, 1972.

      c.  Industrial Waste Division Procedural Manual.

C-39  Texas Water Quality Board, Austin, Texas, A Suggested
      Industrial Waste Ordinance.


C-40  City of Wichita, Kansas

      a.  Title 16, Sewers, Sewage Disposal and Drains, 1964

      b.  An Ordinance Amending Sections of the Code


C-41  State of Vermont, Suggested Model Sewer Use Ordinance,
      January, 1975.


C-42  California Water Pollution Control Association, Berkeley,
      California

      a.  Model Wastewater Discharge Permit Application Question-
          naire,  October, 1974.

      b.  Model Wastewater Discharge Ordinance, April, 1974.


C-43  State of Massachusetts, Suggested Rules and Regulations
      Regarding the Use of Common Sewers, 1974.


C-44  city of Wilmington, Delaware,  Exclusion of Materials
      Detrimental to the Sewerage System
                              7-26

-------
C-45  Buffalo Sewer Authority, Buffalo, New York, Sewer
      Regulations of the Buffalo Sewer Authority.


C-46  East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland, California

      a.  Ordinance No. 27, Waste Water Control Ordinance, 1972

      b.  Wastewater Discharge Permit Parts A-G


C-47  Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles,
      California

      a.  An Ordinance Regulating Sewer Construction, Sewer
          Use and Industrial Wastewater Discharges, April, 1972.

      b.  Instructions for Obtaining a Permit for Industrial
          Wastewater Discharge

      c.  Instructions for Filing an Industrial Wastewater
          Treatment Surcharge Statement

      d.  Industrial Wastewater Charge Rates, 1971

      e.  Technical Report - Waste Discharge to the Ocean

C-48  "Pretreatment Requirements for Industrial Wastes Discharged
      to Municipal Treatment Systems,"  Escher, E.D., and
      Kicinski, A.J., ASCE-EED Specialty Conference on Environ-
      mental Engineering Research, Development and Design, Penn
      State University.

      Results of a study of the ordinances of 100 geographically
      distributed municipalities are presented.  Ordinance status
      is covered along with ranges of  limitations on certain
      pollutants as established by the ordinances in force.

      For additional information pertaining  to this  section,
      please refer to the  following articles:


                B-4             D-112         F-16
                B-10                          F-41
                B-20
                B-21
                B-23
                B-27
                B-31
                               7-27

-------
                  SECTION D - MONITORING

                Reference:   Volume I-Section D
                            Volume II  - Appendix  3


D-l   "The Need for, and Methods of,  Monitoring and Control
      of Industrial Discharges to Sewers," Wrigley, K. J.
      and F. Ashworth, Discharge of Industrial Effluents
      to Municipal Sewerage Systems,  p. 91, Proceedings of
      the Symposium of the Institute  of Water Pollution
      Control, London, (Nov.  29-30, 1971).

           Several aspects of monitoring trade wastes are
      discussed including regulatory  control, instrumental
      methods of analysis,  and qualifications of personnel.
      The monitoring system used in Manchester for the past
      ten years is discussed.


D-2   "Self-Contained  Sampling and Measurement System Features
      Respirometer," Robert Shaw Controls, Water and Sewage
      Works, Vol. 121, No.  2,  p. 53 (February, 1974).

           This article discusses a self-contained sampling
      and measurement system which measures oxygen utilized
      to determine BOD.  The sampler  aerates the effluent
      sample and measures the DO before and after.  Response
      time is 2 minutes.
D-3   "Make Water Pollution Control a Meaningful Local
      Responsibility," Craddock, John M., The American City,
      May, 1974, p. 63.

           This article discusses the procedure used by the
      Division of Water Quality of the Muncie, Indiana Sanitary
      District to monitor industrial and commercial wastewaters
      within their jurisdiction.  Automatic samplers are placed
      on discharges to the sanitary sewer system, which permit
      monitoring for metals, BOD , COD and suspended solids.


D-4   "Instrumentation for Measurement of Wastewater Flow,"
      Nedved, Thomas K. et al, Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 44, No. 5, p. 820
      (May, 1972).

           A new instrument has been developed, which measures
      both stream flow and its characteristics.  The device is
      portable, self-contained, and independent of outside power
      sources.  The system takes a stream sample after a
      preset flow volume has passed.  The instrument is identified
      and described in this article.
                             7-28

-------
D-5   "Polarographic Method for Nitrate and Dissolved
      Oxygen Analysis," Hwang, C. P- and C. R. Forsberg,
      Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 120, No. 4, p. 71,
      (April, 1973).

           This article discusses the disadvantages of
      the common methods for measuring nitrates and
      dissolved oxygen.  The article then describes a
      test utilizing a polarographic apparatus with a
      rapid dropping electrode.  The test results are
      presented.
D-6   "A Rapid  Biochemical Oxygen Demand Test Suitable for
      Operational Control," Mullis, Michael K. and Edward
      D. Schroeder, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 43, No. 2, p. 209 (February, 1971).

           A method to determine the total biological oxygen
      demand of soluble wastes using the chemical oxygen
      demand test and a mass culture of cells is presented
      in this article.  Experimental and operational data
      are both presented.  A method to shorten the time
      required to determine BOD is discussed.
D-7   "The Use of Collaborative Studies to Evaluate Water
      Analysis Instruments," McFarren, Earl F. and Raymond
      J. Lishka, Journal of the Water Pollution Federation,
      Vol. 43, p. 67 (January, 1971).

           A collaborative study has been indicated as a
      method to obtain objective evaluation of measurement
      instruments in laboratories.  Studies of fluorides,
      pesticides, metals and nutrients in water were
      conducted by the Analytical Reference Service.  These
      collaborative studies are analyzed, and the reliability
      of various instruments is presented.
D-8   "Total Phosphorus Analysis:  Persulfate on Ashing?"
      Gupta, Kailash B. and Alphonse E. Zanoni, Water and
      Sewage Works, Vol. 121, No. 7, p. 74 (July, 1974).

           This article describes two methods for total
      phosphorus analysis, the persulfate oxidation and the
      dry ashing method.  The article presents analytical
      procedures for both methods, and examples of tests on
      natural water samples are included.  Comparisons of
      the two tests are presented and discussed.
                                7-29

-------
D-9   "Metals in Sewage Measured Simply but Accurately,"
      The American City, August, 1972, p. 40

           This article describes how the laboratory at the
      Irwin Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant in Charlotte,
      North Carolina uses an atomic absorption spectrophoto-
      meter to monitor metal elements.


D-10  "Laboratory Tests for Plant Operation Control and Stream
      Quality Measurement," Banerji, Shankha K., Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 43, No. 3,
      p. 399 (March 1971).

           A number of water quality tests, including those
      for BOD, COD, TOC, total oxygen demand, suspended solids,
      sludge volume index and oxidation - reduction potential
      are discussed in this article.  The advantages and
      disadvantages of each test are also discussed.


D-ll  "Gauging and Sampling Industrial Wastewater  (Open Channel),
      Klein, Larry A. and Albert Montague, Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 42, No. 8,
      p. 1468  (August, 1970).

           The gauging and sampling system developed by New
      York City to measure industrial discharge to the sewer
      system is presented in this article.  The methods
      utilized are applicable to open channels.
      The methods described include:  an inflatable gas bag
      and portable ejector system for in-plant gauging; and a
      combination V-notch weir or flume with a head measuring
      device and a propeller meter for out-of-plant measurements.


D-12  "Routine Surveillance Alternatives for Water Quality
      Management," Ward, Robert C., Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 12, p. 2645
      (December, 1974).

           Grab sampling, automatic monitoring, and remote
      sensing are reviewed in this paper.  Their individual
      and collective roles in the overall design of a routine
      water quality surveillance program are discussed.
                              7-30

-------
D-13  "Portable Device to Measure Industrial Wastewater Flow,"
      Forester, R. and D. Overland, Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 4, p. 777
      (April, 1974).

           This paper describes a method of monitoring the
      wastewater pumps in a sewage treatment plant to record
      the pump's operating time.  The paper indicates how
      this defines both the total flow and the flow during
      any period of time.  This data can compliment auto-
      matic samplers in obtaining accurate wastewater measure-
      ments .


D-14  "Carbon Measurements in Water Quality Monitoring," Maier,
      Walter J. and Hugh L. McConnell, Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 4, p. 623
      (April, 1974).

           This article discusses the use of a carbon analyzer
      to test natural waters in Minnesota.  The results of an
      extensive test program are presented.  The program
      tested the organic and inorganic carbon content of the
      waterways, various equipment, and the correlations
      between BOD/TOC and COD/TOG ratios.


D-15  "Comparison of Wastewater Sampling Techniques,"
      Tarazi, D. S. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 708,  (May, 1970).

           The results of a study comparing two sampling
      techniques is presented.  One technique uses grab samples
      and the other composite samples.  The tests were run
      on two separate outfalls and results of the tests are
      indicated.
D-16   "Evaluation of an Automatic Chemical Analysis Monitor
       for Water Quality Parameters," O'Brien, James E. and
       Rolf A. Olsen, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
       Federation, Vol. 42, No. 3, p. 380,  (March, 1970).

           This article evaluates an automatic water monitor-
       ing unit with 12 channels to measure:  Nitrate, Nitrite,
       Alkalinity-pH 8.3, Alkalinity-pH  4.6, Phenol, Free
       Ammonia, Sulfate, Phosphate, Iron (Fe), COD, Methylene
       Blue Active Substance, and Fluoride.  The test site was
       on the Hudson River, 3 miles south of Albany, New York.
       Operational problems of the unit  are discussed.  Modifi-
       cations to the unit in attempts to overcome some problems
       are discussed,and factors which must be taken into con-
       sideration in the design of an automatic system are
       reported.

                                7-31

-------
D-17  "The Detection of Organic Pollution by Automated
      COD," Molof, A. H. and N. S. Zaleiko, Proceeding of
      the 19th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University
      (1964) , p.540.

           This paper presents the results of experimental
      work to convert the manual COD test as outlined in
      Standard Methods to an automated chemical test.  The
      test consists of using a colorimeter to measure the
      Hexavalent Chromium present after the oxidation steps.
      Laboratory and field test results are both given.


D-18  "An automated BOD Respirometer," Arthur, Robert M.,
      Proceedings of the 19th Industrial Waste Conference/
      Purdue University,(1964), p. 628.

           This paper describes an automatic instrument which
      measures BOD utilizing the partial pressure of oxygen
      over a sample with the use of a manometer.


D-19  "A Colorimetric Method for Determining Chemical Oxygen
      Demand," Gaudy, A. F. and M. Ramanathan, Proceedings of
      the 19th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University
      (1964) , p. 915

           The purpose of the experiments reported in this
      article was to determine whether COD values obtained
      by the standard titrimetric procedure were equivalent
      to those obtained colorimetrically when identical samples
      were subjected to identical reflux conditions.  Tests
      were conducted on municipal, industrial, and joint wastes.
      Laboratory tests on a standard compound were also included,


D-20  "The Determination of Total Organic Carbon in Water,"
      Larson, T. E. et. al., Proceedings of the 19th Industrial
      Waste Conference, Purdue University  (1964), p. 762.

           This paper discusses one method for measuring the
      carbon dioxide process by the TOC test, which uses
      Van Slyke reagent.  Laboratory test results are presented
      and discussed.
                              7-32

-------
D-21  "Characterization of Industrial Wastes by Instrumental
      Analysis," Clark, H. A. Proceedings of the 23rd
      Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University (1967)
      p. 26.

           This paper presents a general discussion of a large
      laboratory in Toronto, and discusses the work func-
      tions and equipment available in the laboratory.  The
      use of the instruments (including polarography, atomic
      adsorption spectrophotometry, and chromatographic methods),
      and the application of these techniques to industrial
      wastes is also indicated.


D-22  "A Fluorometric Method for the Determination of Lignin
      Sulfonates in Natural Waters," Thruston, Alfred D., Jr.,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 42,
      No. 8, p. 1551 (August, 1970).

           The use of a simple fluorometer for the detection
      of low concentrations of lignin sulfonate solutions is
      described in this article.  An optical bridge fluorometer
      was used in experiments which are also described.  The
      limits of fluorescent assay are presented and details
      of a continuous monitoring system are also indicated.


D-23  "Remote Sensing of Water Pollution," Horn, Leonard W.,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 40, No. 10, p. 1728  (October, 1968).

           The concept and theory of remote sensing are discussed
      in this article.  A discussion of the various factors
      which govern the remote sensing of water pollution is
      also included.  Different types of remote sensing are
      discussed and the advantages and limitations of many are
      presented.


D-24  "Application of the Total Carbon Analyzer for Industrial
      Wastewater Evaluation," Ford, Davis L., Proceedings of
      the 23rd Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University
      (1968), p. 989.

           This article presents information on the correlation
      of BOD and COD to TOC for various chemicals and for
      various industrial waste streams  (e.g. chemical and
      petrochemical).  Literature was used as the source for
      the raw data.
                                 7-33

-------
D-25  "Identification of Petroleum Products in Water," Lively, L.,
      et al,  Proceedings of the 20th Industrial Waste Conference.
      Purdue University (1965),  p. 657.

           This paper presents an analytical method to deter-
      mine petroleum products in water.  Specific industrial
      problems are then used to illustrate the application of
      these analytical methods.


D-26  "Value of Instrumentation in Wastewater Treatment/1
      Salvatorelli, Joseph, Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 101 (January, 1968).

           Instrumentation and its application to waste treat-
      ment plants is discussed in this article.  The types of
      instrumentation available, the value of instrumentation,
      the applications of instruments and examples of their
      use are all discussed.
D-27  "Monitoring and Treatment of Cyanide - Bearing Plating
      Wastes," Vought, John H., Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 39, No. 12, p. 1971  (Dec., 1967)

           Treatment plant controls, and monitoring equipment
      at a Motorola plant are described.  Their automatic
      monitoring includes pH and cyanide measurement.
D-28  "Determination of Organics in Water," Andelman, Julian B.
      et. al., Proceedings of the 20th Industrial Waste Conference,
      Purdue University (1965) p. 220.

           This paper assesses the extent of recoverability of
      organics when activated carbon is used to remove organics
      from wastewater.  The organics are then extracted from
      the carbon and measured.  Municipal tap water was used
      as the sample for the experiments.


D-29  "Water Quality Monitoring must be Action-Oriented,"
      Stack, Vernon T., Jr., Water and Waste Engineering,
      Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 310 (March, 1971).

           This article discusses monitoring systems in
      detail.  Problems in their administration  (with potential
      solutions)are indicated, particularly in regard to obtain-
      ing representative samples.  A review of automatic samplers
      on the market is also included.
                              7-34

-------
D-30  "Waste Monitoring by Gas Chromatography," Cochran,
      L. G. and F. D. Bess, Journal of the Water Pollation
      Control Federation, Vol. 38, No. 12, p. 2002  (Dec., 1966).

           The development of gas chromatography and its
      use at the Institute, West Virginia Plant of Union
      Carbide Corporation is presented in this article.
      Gas chromatographs help control organic loadings on the
      treatment plant, trace abnormal losses of chemicals
      common to several departments, and evaluate the effective-
      ness of treatment.


D-31  "A Rapid Wastewater Sensitivity Test," Brown, James A.,
      Jr., Industrial Waste, May/June, 1972, p. 28.

           The application of a modified paper disc technique
      for rapid screening of wastewater is described. Materials
      that exert a deleterious effect on the physiological
      function of the microorganisms in activated sludge
      may be detected by this technique.  The test  is
      qualitative, and the details of the technique are
      presented.


D-32  "Cold Vapor" Method for Determining Mercury," Kopp,
      John F. et. al., Journal of the American Water Works
      Association, Vol.  64, p. 20  (Jan., 1972).

           This article presents an analytical method for
      measuring mercury  in water.  The method was developed
      in the author's laboratory.  An atomic absorption
      spectrophotometer with auxiliary equipment is required.


D-33  "Mercury Analysis and Toxicity:  A Review," Baker, Robert
      A. and Ming-Dean Luh, Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 118,
      No.  5, p. IW-21,  (May, 1971).(Also included  in Industrial
      Wastes, May/June,  1971)

           This article reviews various methods used to measure
      mercury, both  qualitatively and quantitatively.  The
      advantages and disadvantages of each procedure are
      discussed.  The toxicological effects of mercury are also
      indicated in this article.
                                7-35

-------
D-34  "Monitoring Wastewater?  Try these Methods," Churchill,
      R. J. and T. A. Helbig, Industrial Wastes, September/
      October 1974, p. 26.

           A basic approach to a self-monitoring system is
      presented in this article.  The needs for and methods
      to obtain representative samples are indicated, and the
      Federal Guidelines and various analytical methods are
      reported.


D-35  "A New Technique for Industrial Waste Sampling,"
      Beach, Martha I. and John S. Beach, Jr., Industrial
      Wastes, January/February, 1973, p. 28.

           This article describes a sampling technique called
      the sequential composite, and compares it to grab samples,
      simple composites and flow proportioned composites.


D-36  "Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry Simplifies Heavy-
      Metals Analysis," Willey, Benjamin F., et. al., Journal
      of the American Water Works Association, Vol. 64, p. 303 ,
      (May, 1<>72)

           This article presents the basic operating principles
      and procedures for adjusting the instrument settings of
      an atomic absorption spectrophotometer and precautions
      concerning its operation.   Its application for the analysis
      of heavy metals is discussed in detail.   The article also
      compares atomic absorption with wet chemical analysis.


D-37  "Rapid Phosphate Determination by Fluorimetry,"
      Guyon, John C. and Wolbur D. Shults, Journal of the
      American Water Works Association, Vol. 63, p. 403
      (August, 1969).

           Two similar procedures for determining phosphate
      concentrations are discussed.   One method is suitable
      for lower concentrations and the second for higher levels.
      The elimination of interferences of cations and anions
      is also discussed.  The apparatus, reagents and procedures
      to be used and the effects of certain variables are
      presented.
                             7-36

-------
D-38  "Detection and Monitoring of Phenolic Wastewater,"
      McRae, A. D. et. al., Proceedings of the 14th
      Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, (1959).

           This paper describes the modifications made to
      an instrument which used a nitrous acid-mercuric nitrate
      reagent  (millions Reagent) to monitor phenols.  Modifica-
      tions included a water softener, buffering agent and
      indolac reagent.  The modifications were made on an
      instrument which monitored the effluent from the
      Imperial Oil Limited Oil Refinery in Sarnia, Ontario,
      Canada.


D-39  "Polarographic Scanning of Industrial Waste Samples,"
      Porter, J. D. and W. W. Sanderson, Proceedings of the
      9th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University
      (1954).

           A method of screening water samples to determine
      which metals are present is reported.  The advantage
      of this  screening is to eliminate analyzing for
      metals which are not present.  A detailed description
      of the equipment and the procedure of the tests is
      given.


D-40  "New, Simplified Methods for Metal Analysis," McFarren,*
      Earl F., Journal of the American Water Works Association,
      Vol. 64, p. 28  (January, 1972).

           This article summarizes the theory and operation of
      atomic absorption spectrophotometry-  Different procedures
      applicable to determine various metals is discussed.  The
      metals include zinc, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese,
      silver, cobalt, nickel, cadmium, chromium, aluminum,
      beryllium, barium, vanadium, arsenic and mercury.


D-41  "Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury:  A Plenary Account for
      Water Pollution, Part I - Occurrence, Toxicity and Detection,"
      Cheremisinoff, Paul, N. and Yousuf H. Habib, Water and
      Sewage Works, Vol. 119, No. 7, p. 73  (July, 1972).

           A description of the nature, sources and uses of the
      metals listed in the title are presented.  The toxicity
      (level of concentration at which it becomes toxic)  and toxic
      effects of each metal are also given.  Analytic methods
      for detection of these elements are indicated.
                              7-37

-------
D-42  "Monitoring New York's Water Automatically," Maylath,
      Ronald E., Journal of the American Water Works Association/
      Vol. 63, p. 517 (August, 1971).~~

           This article describes the automatic monitoring
      system used throughout New York State.  The surveillance
      network provides information to consulting engineers,
      industrial firms, and local, state and federal agencies.
      The system consists of different "Building Blocks,"
      including major monitoring stations,  remote terminals,
      and computer stations.


D-43  "TLC Finds Hexane Solubles," Atanus, Herbert, Water and
      Wastes Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 10, p. 26 (October, 1974).

           A thin-layer chromatography (TLC) technique is used
      to help separate and identify hexane solubles at the
      Metropolitan Sanitary District of Chicago. A description
      of the technique and its advantages are given.


D-44  "Modern Monitoring of a Treated Industrial Effluent,"
      Ostendorf, R. G. and J. F. Byrd, Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol.  41, No. 1 p. 89
      (January, 1969).

           This article describes the monitoring system used
      by the Charmin Paper Products Company to monitor their
      waste treatment plant on the Susquehanna River.  Para-
      meters monitored automatically are total carbon, suspended
      solids, and pH.  A detailed description of the system
      and its interlocks to the treatment plant are given.


D-45  "Rapid Instrumental Measurement of the Organic Load
      in Wastewaters," Lysyj, I. et. al., Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol.  41, No. 5, p. 831,
      (May, 1969).

           A pyrographic approach to determine the total organic
      carbon is presented in this article.  The results of
      experiments are then compared and correlated to BOD
      values.  These tests were run in Los Angeles.
                               7-38

-------
D-46  "Comparison Studies of Winkler vs. Oxygen Sensor,"
      Reynolds,  Jeremiah F., Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 41, No. 12, p. 2002 (December,
      1969).

           This article discusses two techniques to accelerate
      and simplify dissolved oxygen determinations compared to
      the Winkler test method.  Both methods use oxygen sensors.


D-47  "Evaluation of Instrumentation and Control," Babcock,
      Russell H., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 44, No. 7, p. 1416  (July, 1972).

           Methods to evaluate what automatic controls are
      practical in sewage treatment plants are discussed.
      The parameters discussed include control variables,
      the need for records, the caliber of personnel
      available, and the need for detection of alarm conditions.
      The advantages and disadvantages of electrical and
      pneumatic instrumentation are presented and compared.


D-48  "Analytical Determination of Metals Affecting Sewage
      Treatment," Riehl, M. L. and E. G. Will, Proceedings of
      the 4th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University
      (1948).

           This paper describes the early work conducted to
      develop analytic methods for the determination of metals,
      such as copper, zinc, iron, chromium, nickel, cadmium,
      and cyanide.  The methods include colorimetric, volumetric
      and gravimetric techniques.


D-49  "Monitoring Industrial Pollutants by Pyrolysis - Methane
      Detection Method," Lysyj, I. et. al., Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 40, No. 5, Part 2,
      p. R181,  (May, 1968).

           This article discusses the monitoring of methyl-
      containing organic compounds, which occur in industrial
      wastes, but not in natural pollutants.  Natural organic
      pollutants contain hydroxyl and amino groups.  Therefore,
      the procedure discussed in this paper  (the use of pyrolysis-
      methane detection methods) can determine whether an
      industry has discharged to a particular stream or treat-
      ment plant.  The instruments include a gas chromatograph,
      a hydrogen flame ionization detector, a microcombustion
      furnace, and a recorder.
                              7-39

-------
D-50  "Instrumentation for Water Pollution Control," Jones,
      Robert H., Pollution Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 6, p. 22
      (November/December, 197l).

           A brief summary of where controls and instrumenta-
      tion can be used in a sewage treatment plant is indicated
      in this article.  Their specific use in a plating waste
      treatment plant is also reported.


D-51  "A Rapid Method for the Estimation of Trace Amounts of
      Kerosene in Effluents,"Lee, E. G. H. and C. C. Walden,
      Water Research, Vol. 4, No. 9, p. 641 (1970).

           This article discusses a method to determine the
      concentration of hydrocarbons in water, in the range of
      10-100 mg/1.  The method  involves separating and con-
      centrating the hydrocarbons by adsorption on activated
      carbon, followed by removing the hydrocarbons with
      acetone and measuring the turbidity of the acetone.


D-52  "Analysis of Water for Molecular Hydrogen Cyanide",
      Nelson, K. H. and I. Lysyj, Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 43, No. 5, p. 799 (May, 1971).

           The toxicity of cyanide and its relationship to the
      presence of HCN and total cyanide is reported in this
      article.  The method presented for the measurement
      of hydrogen cyanide combines vapor phase equilibration
      (Gas chromatographic methods) with amperometric techniques.
      The technique consists of sparging a small portion of
      the undissociated HCN from the sample, trapping the HCN
      in dilute base, and then measuring the sparged HCN with
      a rotating gold anode.


D-53  "The Role of Automatic Sampling in Industrial Waste
      Control," Beach, Martha I, and C. Fred Gurnham, Mid Atlantic
      Industrial Waste Conference, No. 5 p. 225  (1971).

           This paper reviews the advantages of industrial
      self-monitoring and presents a handbook type approach
      to the selection of the right type of sampling equipment.


D-54  "Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer Facilitates Water
      Analysis," Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 121, No. 1, p. 27
      (January, 1974).

           This article describes how spectrophotomic techniques
      are used at the Ben Nesin Laboratory in New York State.
                               7-40

-------
D-55  "Determination of Heavy Metals in Municipal Sewage
      Plant Sludges by Neutron.Activation Analysis,"
      Water, Air and Soil Pollution, Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 327
      (September, 1974).

           A discussion of the use of Neutron Activation
      Analysis  (NAA) to scan sewage sludges for trace metal
      -content is presented.  The meanings of the varia-
      tions in metal concentrations are discussed
      and the precision and potential of NAA is reported.


D-56  "The Determination of Heavy Metals in Domestic Sewage
      Treatment Plant Wastes," Van Loon, J. C. et. al.,
      Water, Air and Soil Pollution, Vol. 2, No. 4, p. 473
      (December, 1973).

           Atomic absorption spectroscopy procedures are out-
      lined for the determination of some heavy metals in
      solids and liquids.  Problems associated with sample
      preparation and sample solution interferences are
      described.  Sewage treatment plant products  (both liquid
      and solid) are analyzed and the results are given for
      samples representative of a wide range of sewage input
      patterns.


D-57  "Rapid Determination of Total Organic Carbon  (TOC)
      in Sewage," Blackmore, R. H. and Doris Voshel, Water
      and Sewage Works, Vol. 114, No.10, p. 398  (October, 1967)

           This article presents TOC data gathered at the
      Grand Rapids, Michigan sewage treatment plant by the
      use of the Leco Carbon analyzer connected to a Leco
      Combustion Furnace.  This data is compared to data for
      BOD and COD on the same wastes.
D-58  "Statistical Evaluation of BOD verses GDI," Reynolds,
      Jeremiah F. and Karl A. Goellner, Water and Sewage Works,
      Vol. 121, No. 1, p. 31  (January, 1974).

           This article describes the test procedure  for the
      determination of the oxygen demand  index  (ODI).
                              7-41

-------
D-59  "Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Techniques for Petrochemical
      Wastewater Analysis," Sugar, William J. and Richard A.
      Conway, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 40, No. 9, p. 1622 (September, 1968).

           Laboratory techniques for efficiently selecting
      gas-liquid Chromatographic  (GLC) operating parameters
      based on different problems are described.
      Measurements can be made down to one mg/1.  Emphasis
      was placed on the selection of column liquid phases
      for separation of a wide span of organic types, definition
      of the utility of temperature programming, and improve-
      ment of precision by use of an internal standard.


D-60  "Analysis of Municipal and Chemical Wastewaters by an
      Instrumental Method for COD Determination," Stenger, V. A.
      and C. E. Van Hall, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 40, No. 10 , p. 1755 (October, 1968).

           This article reports the experience gained from a
      new method of COD determination.  This method uses a
      vapor phase oxidation-reduction system and takes two
      minutes to complete.  Tests were run on the wastewater
      at the sewage treatment plant at Midland, Michigan, and
      at the Dow Chemical Co. in the same city.  The test
      results are reported.


D-61  "Differentiation of LAS and ABS in Water," Maeller,
      Claude Z. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 39, No. 10, Part 2, p. R92
      (October, 1967).

           A method of differentiating between ABS based
      detergents  (Low Biodegradeability) and LAS based deter-
      gents  (High Biodegradeability) can be achieved.  This
      method combines and modifies those developed by Fairing
      and Short; and Frazee and Crisler.  The method is
      described in this article.
D-62  "An Automated Method for the Determination of Formaldehyde
      in Sewage and Sewage Effluents," Musselwhite, C. C. and
      K. W. Petts, Water Pollution Control, Vol. 73, No. 4,
      p. 443 (1974)"::

           This article presents a method to automatically
      measure the concentration of formaldehyde.  The method
      utilizes a chemical reaction to produce a color which
      can be measured colorimetrically.  An automatic analyzer
      is used as a necessary piece of equipment.
                             7-42

-------
D-63  "A Safe Solvent for Oil and Grease Analyses/1 Chanin,
      G. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 39, No. 11, p. 1892  (November, 1967).

           Procedures for determining oil and grease are
      presented, consisting of using either Trichlorotrifluoro-
      ethane or using the soxhlet extraction method for sludge,
      instead of hexane which is called for in  "standard methods,"
      but which can be dangerous .in the laboratory.


D-64  "Comparative Studies of Dissolved Oxygen  Analysis Methods,"
      McKeown, J. J. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 39, No. 8, p. 1323  (August, 1967).

           This paper compares the Winkler Method to the
      membrane electrode method of measuring dissolved oxygen.
      The interferences present in the sample are also discussed.


D-65  "Detection of Trace Metals in Water," Kerber, Jack, D.,
      Industrial Water Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5,  (September/
      October, 1973).

           A basic discussion on atomic absorption is presented.
      It's operation and application to the measurement of
      metals in water are discussed.  Costs for equipment are
      also given.


D-66  "The Determination of  Stable Organic  Compounds in Waste
      Effluents at Microgram per Liter Levels by Automatic
      High-Resolution Ion Exchange Chromatography," Katz, Sidney
      et. al., Water Research, Vol.  6, No.  9, p. 1029  (September,
      1972).

           This article presents the results of a  study using
      high-resolution ion exchange chfomatography  to measure
      pollutants in sewage.  A description  of the  equipment,
      the field experiments, the results and conclusions are
      presented.
                               7-43

-------
D-67  "Automated Fluorometric Method for Determination of
      Boron in Waters, Detergents and Sewage Effluents,"
      Afghan, Badar K.,  et. al., Water Research, Vol. 6,
      No. 12, p. 1475 (1972).

        This method of automatically measuring boron is based
      on the reaction of 4 chloro-2-hydroxy-4methoxybenzophenone
      (CHMB) with boron to produce fluorescent species in a 90%
      sulfuric acid medium.  Measurements are in the 5-100
      microgram per liter range.  The equipment, procedures,
      and results of experiments are presented.


D-68  "Industry's Idea Clinic," various authors, Journal of
      the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 37, No. 4,
      p. 508  (April, 1965).

           A discussion was held on industrial waste automatic
      sampling among individuals at the Federation's 37th
      Annual Conference.  Members of industry presented their
      experiences with different monitoring schemes including
      operational problems and solutions.


D-69  "An Industrial Waste Sampling Program," Woodruff, Paul H.,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 37, No. 9, p. 1223  (September, 1965).

           This article discusses the waste sampling program
      used by the Midland Division of the Dow Chemical Company.
      The mechanics of setting up a sampling program, and the
      sampling systems installed are both reported.


D-70  A Study of Methods used in Measurement and Analysis of
      Sediment Loads in Streams-Report T,Progress Report,
      Laboratory Investigation of Pumping-Sampler Intakes/
      Federal Inter-Agency Sedimentation Project, Minneapolis,
      Minnesota  (April,  1966).

           This document describes the development of a pump-
      ing sampler intake structure that is dependable and draws
      an accurate sample.
                            7-44

-------
D-71  A Study of Methods used in Measurement and Analysis of
      Sediment Loads in Streams, Report" UyAn Investigation of
      a Device for Measuring the Bulk Density of Water-Sediment
      Mixtures, Beverage, J. P. and J. V. Skinner, Federal
      Inter-Agency Sedimentation Project, Minneapolis, Minnesota
      (August, 1974).

           This booklet describes a device which was developed
      to test whether sediment concentration can be determined
      by measuring the bulk density of the liquid.  The device
      is a special neutrally buoyant container.  The displace-
      ment of an indicator rod is measured after equilibrium
      is reached.  Results of the experiment are given and
      discussed.
D-72  A Study of Methods used in Measurement and Analysis of
      Sediment Loads in Streams, Catalog of Instruments and
      Reports for Fluvial Sediment Investigations, Federal
      Inter-Agency Sedimentation Project, Minneapolis,
      Minnesota,  (June, 1974).

           Suspended sediment samplers, bed material samplers,
      pumping type bottling samplers, a hand size analyzer, and
      a laboratory splitter, all developed by the Federal Inter-
      Agency Sedimentation Project, are described, with pictures
      and drawings.


D-73  "Orthophosphate Determinations Using Premeasured Reagents,"
      Baskett, Russell C., Water and Sewage Works, January, 1973,
      p. 47.

           A simple,fast orthophosphate measurement can be made
      by mixing 5 ml of sample with a premeasured polyethylene
      powder pillow,and measuring the color 1 minute later on
      a spectrophotometer  (710 nyu) .  The chemical is PhosVer III
      (Hach Co.).


D-74  "Total Mercury Analysis:  Review and Critique," Reimers,
      Robert S. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation. Vol. 45, No. 5, p. 815  (May, 1973).

           This article presents a detailed discussion on the
      analysis for total mercury.  Headings include techniques
      for wet oxidation and complete combustion of mercury samples;
      preconcentration of mercury, and analytical techniques includ-
      ing gravametric methods, volumetric methods, polarography,
      amperometric analysis, catalytic analysis, colorimetric
      analysis, and atomic absorption.
                                7-45

-------
D-75  "Industrial Waste Treatment Plant Instrumentation,"Babcock,R.H.,
      Water and Waste Engineering,Vol.5, No.9, p. 3  (Sept. 1968).

           This paper briefly discusses how controls and
      instrumentation can be used for pumping, cyanide destruc-
      tion, chrome reduction, neutralization, and batch treatment.


D-76  Permit Program Guidance for Self-Monitoring and Reporting
      Requirements, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
      Office of Water Enforcement (October 1, 1973).

           This document provides guidance to those interested
      in setting up a self-monitoring program.  It is directed
      towards both industrial and municipal interests.  The
      report includes guidance on data management, report
      schedules and many other areas.


D-77  "Automatic Samplers for Sewage and Effluents," Levin, V. H.
      and A. Latten, Process Biochemistry, June, 1973, p. 15.

           This paper reviews various samplers, by manufacturer,
      and describes each one.  The advantages and disadvantages
      of each machine are presented.


D-78  "Automatic Samplers," Wood, L. B., and H. H. Stanbridge,
      Water Pollution Control, Vol.  67, p. 495 (19681) .

           This article presents the results of a survey of
      automatic samplers available in England.  The survey
      was conducted to help decide which samplers to use in
      the Department of Public Health Engineering of the
      Greater London Council.  The article discusses general
      features to examine in samplers, and describes various
      samplers by manufacturer.


D-79  "Instrumentation in Water Pollution Control Analysis,"
      Williamson, T. and A. S. Millar, Water Pollution
      Control, Vol. 70,  (1971).

           The use of instrumentation to replace classical
      "wet" methods to determine chemical analysis can be used
      to reduce analysis time and increase reliability and
      precision.  This article discusses the auto analyzer ,
      atomic-absorption spectrophotometer, and gas-liquid
      chromatography in reference to the above factors.
                              7-46

-------
D-80  "In-Process Monitoring," Zabban, Walter, presented at
      the EPA Technology Transfer Seminar on Monitoring
      Industrial Wastewater, Arlington, Va., January 9, 1975.

           This article presents the advantages of in process
      monitoring of wastes by industry.  The article also
      discusses how process monitoring can be used to prevent
      treatment plant upsets, features to look for in monitor-
      ing equipment,and the use of monitoring to measure
      various parameters.


D-81   Literature Survey of Instrumental Measurements of
      Biochemical Oxygen Demand for Control Application>196Q-1973P
      Environmental Monitoring Series, National Environmental
      Research Center, Office of Research and Development,
      U. S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio  45268, EPA-670/4-74-001
      (February, 1974).

           This report determines the state-of-the-art of
      instrumental biochemical oxygen demand methods.  A survey
      of related literature published between 1960 and 1973
      is used.  An alternative solution is suggested for
      monitoring secondary treatment plants, using differential
      test values of a sample (e.g. Ł TOC,  Ł TOD, or  ^ COD).


D-82   Performance of the Union Carbide Dissolved Oxygen
      Analyzer,Environmental Monitoring Series, Office of
      tie sear en and Development,  U. S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio
      45268, EPA  670/4-73-018 (July, 1973).

           Union Carbide dissolved oxygen analyzer, model 1101,
      was evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the
      thallium electrode in the measurement of dissolved oxygen
      (DO).   Tests included stability, transient response,
      linearity, and temperature compensation.


D-83  "The Work of the Dalmarnock Laboratory, Glasgow,"
      Cunningham, M. F. et. al.,  Water Pollution Control,
      Vol. 72, No. 4, p. 392 (1973~T

           The monitoring and analysis activities of a sewage
      works laboratory are described.  Activities include the
      use of gas liquid chromatography to identify oils,
      lithium salt injection to determine flow measurements,
      infra-red spectrophotometry to determine organic carbon
      content, atomic absorption spectrophotometry to determine
      mercury, and gas and thin layer chromatography to determine
      chlorinated organics.
                              7-47

-------
D-84   "The Determination of Phenolic Materials in Industrial
       Wastes," Ettinger, M. B. and R. C. Kroner, Proceedings of
       the 5th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University
       p. 345  (1949).

            This article reviews some methods and procedures that
       can be used to determine phenolic materials in industrial
       wastes.  A detailed description is given of procedures
       to screen out interfering materials.  The use of bromine
       demand and Gibbs techniques to determine phenol is also
       presented.


D-85   "Solvents in Sewage and Industrial Waste Waters:  Identifi-
       cation and Determination," Ellison, W. K. and T. E. Wallbank,
       Water Pollution Control, Vol. 73, No. 6 p. 656,(1974).

            The use of infra-red and ultra-violet spectroscopy
       in conjunction with gas chromatography is assessed as a
       detection and identification technique.  Its application
       to identifying traces of immiscible solvent residues in
       samples of industrial waste waters, sewages and sludges
       is presented.


D-86   " Cobalt Interference in the Non-Steady State Clean Water
       Test," Kalinske, A. A. et. al., Water and Sewage Works,
       Vol. 120, No. 7, p. 54, (July, 1973).

            Laboratory tests evaluated the oxygenation capacity
       of aeration equipment using the "non-steady state clean
       water techniques."  Deoxygenation of the aerator test
       basin was accomplished by adding sodium sulfite and a
       cobalt salt catalyst.  Cobalt interference in the determin-
       ation of dissolved oxygen by the Winkler Method was also
       investigated.


D-87   "1975 Annual Review of the New Developments in Water
       Quality Instrumentation," Cheremisinoff, Paul N. and
       Richard Young, Pollution Engineering,March, 1975, p. 28.

            This review reports the significant developments
       made by instrument manufacturers during 1975, and mentions
       some new products that may be useful to pollution engineers.
       Included is a list of instrument manufacturers.
                                7-48

-------
D-88   "Thin Layer Chromatography as a Sorting Test for
       Metals in Trade Effluent," Bailey, A. R.,Water Pollution
       Control, Vol. 68, No. 4, p. 449,  (1969).

            Detailed information is presented on procedures to
       identify and determine metal components in trade effluents.
       Thin layer chromatography is the recommended method.
       Results from the Purdy and Trut^r equation for determining
       metal concentrations are compared to those obtained from
       atomic absorption.


D-89   "Thin Layer and Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Parathion
       and Methyl Parathion in the Presence of Chlorinated Hydro-
       carbons," Kawahara, F. K. et. al., Journal of the Water
       Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 446,
       (March, 1967).

            Methods to identify and measure chlorinated hydro-
       carbons and thiophosphate pesticides in water are described.
       The procedure used was employed to follow the course of
       accidental contamination in a river by pesticides.  A
       discussion of sampling, extraction, analysis by thin layer
       and gas chromatography, and infra-red spectrophotometry
       are also included.


D-90   "Chloride Interference in Nitrate Nitrogen Determination,"
       Malhotra, S. K., and A. E. Zanoni, Journal o-f the American
       Water Works Association, Vol. 62, NCK9, p. 568,
       (September, 1970) .

            This paper presents graphs to quantitatively determine
       the interference of chlorides in the Standard Methods
       test for Nitrate Nitrogen.


D-91   "Automatic Sampling and Measurement of Small Liquid
       Flows," Evans, M. R. and R. Edgar, Water Pollution Control,
       Vol. 70, (1971).

            This article describes a sampling machine which was
       developed without using a peristaltic pump or a timing
       clock.  The article also describes the construction of a
       low-cost flow recorder, which uses an overflow weir and
       a float-operated pen.
                                  7-49

-------
D-92   "Determination of Proteins in Waste Water," Woods,
       Calvin, Process Industrial Waste Control, Vol. 49,
       No. 4, p. 501 (July, 1965).

            Different techniques for measuring proteins in
       wastewater are presented.  The advantages
       and disadvantages of each technique are indicated.  Some
       of the methods described include kjeldahl organic nitrogen,
       colorimetric determinations, the Eolin reaction, and the
       Biuret reaction.


D-93   "Toxic Inorganic Materials and their Emergency Detection
       by the Polarographic Method," Offner, Harry G. and Edward
       F. Witucki, Journal of the American Water Works Association,
       Vol. 60, No. 8, p. 947,  (August, 1968).

            The use of polarography utilizing the dropping
       mercury electrode for rapid and easy antimony, arsenic,
       cadmium, lead, mercury,selenium, tellurium and thallium
       analysis is discussed.  Discussions on these chemicals'
       physiological and toxic properties are also given.


D-94   "Monitoring with Carbon Analyzers," Arin, M. Louis,
       Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 10,
       p. 898  (October, 1974).

            A comparison of different instruments available for
       TOG  determinations is presented.  A brief discussion of
       the correlation between TOG, BOD and COD is also
       contained.


D-95   A Quick Biochemical Oxygen Demand Test,  U. S. EPA,
       Water Pollution Control Research Series, EPA No. 16050 EMF
       (06171), 48 pp.

            A study was conducted to develop a satisfactory,
       short term biological oxygen demand test suitable for
       operational control of waste treatment processes.  The
       test is a modification of the total biological oxygen
       demand  (T^OD) test.  Laboratory experiments were conducted
       to examine the test, and experimental results are presented.


D-96   "Mercury in Public Sewer Systems," Evans, Ralph L.f et al,
       Water and Sewage Works, February, 1973, p. 74.

            This article presents the results of a study of five
       municipalities in central Illinois, which were found to
       contain from 0.1 to 7.9 ppb of mercury in their sewage.
       Analytical procedures and results are also presented.

                               7-50

-------
D-97   "Ion-Selective Electrodes for Quality Measurement and
       Control," Babcock, R. H. Journal of the American Water
       Works Association, January, 1975, p. 26.

            The theory and practice of ion-selective electrodes
       and their application to water quality measurement is
       discussed.  The limitations of their use in the field
       is also considered.


D-98   "Detecting Pollutants with Chemical-Sensing Electrodes,"
       Frant, Martin. S., Environmental Science and Technology,
       Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 224,  (March, 1974).

            The advantages and disadvantages of chemical-sensing
       electrodes for identifying toxic materials in wastewaters
       are considered.  Several applicable analytical methods,
       detection limits, interferences and limitations are
       discussed.  A list of commercially available electrodes
       and their area of application is provided.


D-99   "Variables to be Measured in Wastewater Treatment Plant
       Monitoring and Control," Roesler, Joseph F. and Robert
       H. Wise, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
       Vol. 46, No. 7, p. 1769,  (July, 1974).

            This article reviews methods of measuring those
       variables which would optimize wastewater treatment
       plant operation and control and minimize costs.  The
       discussion centers on four different groups:  Substrate
       variables, physical and chemical variables, suspended
       solids variables, and biological activity variables.


D-100  "When you go into a Manhole or a Sewer, you should Under-
       stand Sewer Gases," Nichols, Preston, R., Deeds, & Data,
       p. 2  (January, 1975).

            The sources and characteristics of typical sewer
       gases are discussed.  Eight different instances are
       considered where gas generation may occur in sewerage
       systems.  Safety precautions for each instance is recommended.


D-101  "Monitoring and Treatment of Cyanide-Bearing Plating Wastes,"
       Vought, John H., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
       Federation, Vol. 39, No. 12, p. 1971  (December, 1967).

            The treatment and control of cyanide-bearing plating
       wastes are aided by an instrument performing continuous
       analysis and monitoring.  The sampling and operation of
       this analyzer is described in detail and operating experiences
       are presented.

                                  7-51

-------
D-102  "Instrument for Monitoring Trace Organic Compounds
       In Water," H. C. Bramer et. al., Water & Sewage•
       Works,  Vol. 113, No. 8, p. 275  (August, 1966).

            An ultra-violet spectrophotometer was developed
       to measure trace organic compounds in water.  It has
       been demonstrated in qualitative and quantitative work
       on water bodies and waste effluents.  These demonstrations
       are described in this article.


D-103  "How to Measure Industrial Wastewater Flow," Thorsen,
       Thor and Rolf Oen, Chemical Engineering, Vol. 82, No. 4,
       p. 95  (February 17, 1975).

            Techniques for qualitative and quantitative waste-
       water analysis are discussed.  Included is a table of
       methods for effluent analysis, their costs and reliabilities.
       Flow calculations and operating principals of weirs and
       flumes are also discussed.


D-104  "Determination of Cyanide in Industrial Effluents," Hewitt,
       P. J. and H. B. Austin, Water Pollution Control, Vol. 71,
       No. 4, p. 381  (1972).

            This article reports on the development of a method
       to separate "free cyanide" from various complex cyanides.
       The effect of interfering substances on the rate of recovery
       of free cyanide is also assessed.


D-105  "Automated Analysis:  The Determination of Ammoniacal,
       Nitrous and Nitric Nitrogen in River Waters, Sewage
       Effluents and Trade Effluents," Chapman, B. et. al.,
       Water Pollution Control, Vol. 66, No. 2, p. 185  (1967).

            The Technicon auto analyzer is evaluated for ammoniacial,
       nitrous and nitric nitrogen determinations in river and
       waste waters.  The results are compared with standard
       analytical methods and presented in tabular form.


D-106  "Sampling and Monitoring Feature," Water and Waste Treatment,
       Vol. 16, No. 10, p. 11  (October, 1973).

            This report includes a review of current water and
       wastewater sampling and monitoring equipment. The applications,
       limitations, manufacturer and description of each
       instrument is presented.
                                7-52

-------
D-107  "Comparison of Air and Water Pollution Instrumentation,"
       Rittmiller, Lawrence A. et. al., Pollution Engineering,
       Vol. 3, No. 6, p. 26  (November-December, 1971).

            Sampling and analysis equipment for measuring air
       and water pollutants are discussed.  Tables are included
       which provide information on instrument characteristics.


D-108  Simultaneous and Automated Determination of Total Phosphorus
       and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Gales, Morris E., Jr., and
       Robert Booth, U.S. EPA, NTIS No. PB 232 710,p.19,(May,1974).

            This study evaluates automated methods for the deter-
       mination of total phosphorus and total kjeldahl nitrogen.
       Laboratory studies were conducted to evaluate  the detection
       limits, precision and accuracy of three detection methods
       (Single Reagent Method for total phosphorus, Selenium Method
       for nitrogen, and Vanadium Method for nitrogen and
       phosphorus) in surface waters and wastewaters.


D-109  Instrumentation for Water Quality Determination, Mentink,
       ASCE, Water Resources Engineering Conference,  March 8-12,
       1965, 43 pp.

            This pamphlet reviews the operation and theory of
       instrumentation that  is used to measure basic  water quality
       parameters.  Several  integrated water quality  instrumenta-
       tion systems are discussed.  Included are illustrations
       of  instrumentation and their circuits.
 D-110   Automated Water Monitoring  Instrument  for Phosphorus
       Contents,  Prager, Manfred,  U.  S. EPA,  NTIS No. PB 222  772,
       June,  1973,  26  pp.

            The development of  a prototype  automated water monitor
       for  trace quantities of  phosphorus compounds is reported.
       The  method uses hydrogen flame  emission spectroscopy.
       Operating parameters described  include  fuel and air flow
       rates, burner configuration,  operating  temperature and
       methods of sample aerosolization.
                               7-53

-------
D-lll  NPDES Permits and Water Analysis, Pojasek, Robert B.
       Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 9, No. 4, p. 320,
       (April  1975)

            This paper reviews the National Pollutant Discharge
       Elimination System (NPDES)  procedure that is required for
       all individuals who discharge pollutants into a waterway
       from a point source.   To receive a permit, the applicant
       must summarize his wastewater characteristics according to
       federally approved methods of sampling and analysis.
       Included is a table that compares analytical methods
       for determining water pollutants under the permit program.


D-112  "Complying with Discharge Regulations," Schafer, Carl J.
       and N. Lailas, Environmental Science and '"technology,
       Vol. 8, No. 10, p. 903, (October, 1974).

            Spokesmen of the federal Environmental Protection
       Agency report how industries and municipalities must
       monitor their wastewaters, and what help is available
       to meet the task of achieving compliance.


D-113  Wastewater Sampling Methodologies and Flow Measurement
       Techniques, Harris, Daniel J. and W. J. Keffer
       U. S. EPA No. 907/9-74-005,June, 1974, 117 pp.

            This report consolidates and summarizes the activities,
       experience, sampling methods, and field measurement
       techniques of the Field Investigations Section of the EPA.
       Sources of error and data variability are also included.


D-114  Quantitative Methods for Preliminary Design of Water
       Quality Surveillance Systems, U. S. EPA, NTIS No. PB 219/010,
        November, 1972 , 226 pp.

            Quantitative methods for the preliminary design of
       water quality surveillance systems are developed and
       demonstrated in this report.  The quantitative methods
       are organized into a User Handbook.  The methods were
       illustrated on the Wabash River Basin and the results
       were satisfactory.
                                 7-54

-------
D"115  Estimation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Presence
       ot DDT-Type Compounds, U. S. EPA, NTIS No. PB 233 599,
             1974, 90 pp.
       Research to develop a simple, rapid method for determining
       PCB, and DDT in water is reported.  The emphasis in the
       experiments is on the sensitivity and specificity of
       luminescence.  Studies include the determination of recoveries
       and detection sensitivities  for compounds of interest.
       An analysis of several environmental waters is also reported.


D-116  Analysis for Mercury in Water, A Preliminary Study of
       Methods, U. S. EPA No. R4-72-003, September, 1972, 58 pp.

            A study to develop analytical methods to determine
       mercury  (organic and inorganic) in water is reported.
       A comparison of various methods in both -distilled and
       surface waters was made.
 D-117  Test Procedure  and  Standards  - ABS and LAS Biodegradability,
       The Soap  and  Detergent Association Scientific and Technical
                                               Ą
                                               id
Report No. 3, January, 1966, 16 pp.
            A procedure  to  determine  the biodegradability of
       ABS  and  LAS  surfactants  is  described.   Results of two
       biodegradability  test  methods,  the  shake  flask and the
       semicontinuous  activated sludge, are presented.


 D-118  Field Tests  of  LAS Biodegradability, The  Soap and Detergent
       Association,Scientific and  Technical Report No.  2,
       September, 1965,  36  pp.

            Field studies were  undertaken  to  evaluate the
       biodegradability  of  LAS  in  extended aeration activated
       sludge plants under  normal  operating conditions.  The
       results  of four different field tests  are presented.


 D-119  "A New Automatic  Sampler for Industrial Outfall, Streams
       and  Sewers," Brailsford, H. D.,  Water  and Sewage Works,
       September, 1968.

            The operation of  a  timer-controlled  intermittent
       pump type sampler is described in this article.  A  schematic
       diagram  of its  circuit is also presented.


                               7-55

-------
D-120  Fluorescent Probes in the Detection of Insecticides
       in Water,  U. S.  EPA,  NTIS No.  PB 221 336, April,  1973,
       41 pp.

            Laboratory  research has been conducted to synthesize
       one or more fluorescent probe molecules which would be
       useful in the analytical methodology for insectide deter-
       minations in water.  Development of experimental parameters
       for design and synthesis of optimum probe molecules is
       reported in this booklet.


D-121  Environmental Applications of Advanced Instrumental
       Analyses;   Assistance Projects,  FY 69-71, U.  S.  EPA,
       May, 1973, 82 pp.

            A multitude of analyses involving the identification
       and measurements of organic pollutants in water are dis-
       cussed under eleven project categories involving a pollu-
       tion incident.  In most cases these analyses  have helped
       to solve,  or at  least understand more clearly the related
       pollution incident.  In some cases the analyses provided
       evidence for enforcement of regulatory legislation.


D-122  Current Practice in GC-MS Analysis of Organics in Water,
       U. S. EPA, NTIS  No. PB 224 947,  August, 1973, 91 pp.

            Experiences during five years of evaluating the
       application of gas chromatography mass spectrometry to
       wastewater analysis is reported.  Procedures  are described
       to analyze for organic water pollutants, including sample
       collection, handling, preparation, analysis,  interpretation
       of the results,  and confirmatory techniques.   Case histories
       illustrating the techniques are  also included.


D-123  "Instrumentation in Pollution Control," Snowden,  F.C.,
       Industrial Water Engineering,  Vol. 7,No. 6, p.22,(June,1970),

            Sensors and analyzers for various water  quality
       determinations are discussed,  including pH, conductivity,
       dissolved  oxygen,  and temperature meters.  Techniques
       for measuring process wastes are also discussed.   Con-
       sidered are:  plating wastes,  acid-base neutralization,
       activated  sludge and  flocculation control.  Instrumentation
       for measuring air pollutants is  also considered.
                               7-56

-------
D-124  Sampling of Wastewater, Shelly, Philip E., U. S. EPA,
       Technology Transfer, Washington, D. C. 20460,
       June, 1974, 115 pp.

            This handbook summarizes wastewater sampling
       techniques and equipment.  It includes a list of
       sampler manufacturers, and detailed descriptions of
       some commercially available equipment.


D-125  Industrial Wastewater Discharges, Compiled and edited by
       Bureau of Water and Wastewater Utilities Management,
       Division of Pure Waters, June, 1969, Albany, N. Y.
       available from the Health Education Service, P. O. Box
       7283, Albany, N. Y. 12224, 56 pp.

            This guide is a compilation of policy, procedural
       and technical suggestions for measuring and reporting
       industrial wastewater characteristics.  Part 1 describes
       the design of a testing and measurement program and
       Part 2 describes administrative aspects.


D-126  Organic Pollutant Identification Utilizing Mass
       Spectrometry, U. S. EPA, NTIS No. PB 224 544, July, 1973.

            A system for the rapid identification of volatile
       organic water pollutants has been developed.  It involves
       gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with computerized
       matching of mass spectra.  Examples are presented to
       illustrate the use of GC/MS for specific identifications.


D-127  Pyrographic Gross Characterization of Water Contaminants,
       U. S. EPA, No. EPA R2-73-227, May, 1973, 94 pp.

            A method has been developed for direct analysis
       of organic materials in aqueous solutions.  The method
       is based on thermal fragmentation followed by gas chroma-
       tographic separation and detection of the resulting deriva-
       tive composition.  The results of a field study are
       reported, and include:  a definition of area of potential
       application of this technique, development of reliable
       analytical procedures, and development of an efficient
       data handling system.
                           7-57

-------
D-128  Detection and Characterization of Animal/Vegetable
       and Petroleum Oil in Municipal Wastewater by Thin
       Layer Chromotography; C.  D.  Cramer,  Nader Chemical
       Co.; Oak Brook,  Illinois.

            An evaluation is made of the thin layer chroma-
       tographic procedure for the separation and quanti-
       fication of animal/vegetable and petroleum oil in
       municipal wastewaters.

D-129  Thin Layer Chromatographic Method for the Determina-
       tion of Petroleum on Mineral Hydrocarbons and Other
       Natural or Synthetic Oils and Greases; Lee Henry,
       Mogul Corporation; Chagrin Falls,  Ohio.

            The report  is an appraisal of an analytical
       method for the determination of saturated hydrocarbons,
       triglycerides, and fatty  acids in municipal waste-
       waters.
       For additional  information pertaining to this  section,
       please refer to the  following articles:

                  A-7             E-38
                  A-15
                  A-19
                  A-24
                  A-25
                  A-27
                  A-28
                            7-58

-------
        SECTION E - POLLUTANTS WHICH INTERFERE WITH
             PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS

             Reference:  Volume I, Section E
                         Volume II, Appendix 5
E-l   "Copper and Anaerobic Sludge Digestion", McDermott,  G.N.,
      et.al., Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol.  35, No. 5, p. 655 (May, 1963).

           The digestion of sludges obtained from sewage to
      which copper in known concentrations was fed continuously
      was observed in pilot plant studies.  Digester perform-
      ance was measured by gas production.  Studies of the effect
      of slug doses were also made.
E-2   "Effects of Copper and Lead Bearing Wastes on the Puri-
      fication of Sewage", Water and Sewage Works,  Vol. 93,
      No. 1, p. 30 (January, 1946) .

           A procedure to examine the effects of small concen-
      trations of metal ions on the  metabolism of sewage is
      reported.  The metal ion effects on nitrification are also
      discussed.
E-3   "Toxicity, Synergism, and Antagonism in Anaerobic Waste
      Treatment Processes", Kugelman, I.J. and K. K. Chin,
      Advanced Chemistry, Series 105, Vol. 55, p. 55 (1971)

           This report reviews the literature on toxicity,
      synergism and antagonism in anaerobic digesters.   Ex-
      perimental inadequacies on much published data are
      pointed out, and methods of minimizing toxic effects of
      metals and certain organics are indicated.  The paper
      also attempts to categorize quantitatively toxicity and
      stimulation, on an absolute basis.
E-4   "Summary Report on the Effects of Heavy Metals on the
      Biological Treatment Processes", Barth, E. F., et.al.,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 37,
      No.  1, p. 86 (January, 1965) .              ~~~~

           The effects of copper, chromium, nickel and zinc,
      individually and in combination on biological treatment
      processes were studied in pilot plant tests.  No-effect
      doses were determined for the  aeration and anaerobic diges-
      tion phases.  Distribution of  metals through the activated
      sludge process and the concentration in the final effluent
      were also indicated.
                                7-59

-------
E-5   "Review of Literature on Toxic Materials Affecting Sewage
      Treatment Processes, Streams, and BOD Determinations",
      Rudolfs W., et. al.,  Sewage and Industrial Wastes,
      Vol. 22, No. 9, p. 1157 (September, 1950).

           The review of the literature is divided into three
      parts*  The first part comprises the effect of toxic
      materials (both organic and inorganic)  on sewage treat-
      ment processes (both aerobic and anaerobic).  It includes
      a review of the effects of various industrial wastes.
      The second part reviews the literature that pertains to
      the physical, chemical, and biological effects of pollutants
      on streams.  The third part reviews the literature on the
      use of the BOD test as a tool for the detection of in-
      hibitory substances on the oxidation of sewage.  Also
      included is a table listing concentrations of wastes and
      compounds which inhibit or retard various treatment pro-
      cesses , and flora and fauna.
E-6   "Zinc in Relation to Activated Sludge and Anaerobic Di-
      gestion Processes", McDermott, Gerald N., et.al., Proceed-
      ings of the 17th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue
      University, p. 461 (1962).

           The efficiency of treatment of sewage containing
      zinc was studied by operation of pilot activated sludge
      plants.  The objectives of the research were to determine
      the level of zinc that can be tolerated without reducing
      treatment plant efficiency, and to determine the efficiency
      of the process in removing zinc.
E-7   "The Effects of Industrial Wastes on Sewage Treatment",
      Masselli, Joseph W., et.al., Report prepared by New England
      Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission, June, 1965.

           The effect of industrial wastes on sewage treatment
      has been reviewed, and methods which may alleviate their
      effect have been described.  Analytical data on metallic
      content of Connecticut sewages have been recorded and re-
      habilitation of metal-sick digesters by use of sulfide
      and sulfate is described.
E-8   Environmental Effect of Photoprocessing Chemicals, Vol. 1,
      Report by the National Association" of Photographic Manu-
      facturers , Inc., 600 Mamaroneck Ave., Harrison, N.Y. 10528
      (1974)

           The effects of photographic chemicals on conventional
      treatment systems and on aquatic organisms are examined.
      Included are results and discussion of wastewater analysis
      and the development of a model to predict downstream response
      to photoprocessing effluent.

                              7- 60

-------
E-9    Environmental Effect of Photoprocessing Chemicals,  Vol.  II,
      Report by the National Association of Photographic  Manu-
      facturers, Inc,,  600 Mamaroneck Avenue, Harrison, N.Y.
      10528, 1974,   324 pp.

           This volume  contains a detailed compilation of all
      the experimental  procedures, results, and data analysis,
      and provides  data to support the statements  and conclusions
      of Vol. I (See Reference E-8).
E-10  Fate of  Benzidine in the Aquatic Environment;  A Scoping
      Study,   U.  S.  EPA Contract | 68-01-2226,  January,  1974.

           To determine the fate of benzidine in the  aquatic
      environment, the stability of the aqueous phase of
      benzidine in biologically active systems  was  studied in
      the laboratory.   Long term BOD and respirometer studies
      were used to measure the removal or continued presence
      of aqueous  benzidine.
E-ll  "Anaerobic Processes - Literature Review",  Ghosh,  S.,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol.  44, No.  6, p.  948 (June 1972).

           Review of the  1971 literature revealed that a greater
      emphasis was  placed by researchers on evaluating the effects
      of various inhibitory chemicals on the performance of
      anaerobic digesters.  Also,  considerable effort was directed
      toward evaluating the fate of precipitated, insoluble
      phosphates added to digesters, along with primary and/or
      secondary sludge.
E-12  "Effects of Chromium On the Activated Sludge Process",
      Moore,  W.  Allan,  et. al.,  Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation,  Vol. 33, No.  1, p. 54 (January 1961).
      Also published in the Proceedings of the 15th Industrial
      Waste Conference  (1960) , Purdue University,  p. 158.

           Pilot plant  studies were conducted to determine the
      extent  to which sewage processes  can tolerate chromium
      wastes.  Removal  efficiencies (BOD and chromium)  and the
      distribution and  concentrations of chromium in various
      treatment units were examined.  Digester effects and sludge
      settleability were also studied.
                                7-61

-------
E-13  "Pilot Plant Experiments on the Effects of Some Constitu-
      ents of Industrial Waste Waters on Sewage Treatment",
      Wheatland, A.B.,  et.al., Water Pollution Control/ Vol. 70,
      p. 626 (1971).

           Pilot studies to assess the effects of copper, nickel,
      zinc and chromium on activated sludge performance are out-
      lined with a view towards developing a realistic assess-
      ment of user costs based on treatability.
E-14  "Nickel in Relation to Activated Sludge and Anaerobic
      Digestion Processes",  McDermott, G.N.,  et.al.,  Journal
      of the Water Pollution Control Federation,  Vol. 37, No. 2,
      p. 163 (February 1965).

           Pilot plant studies were conducted to  determine the
      level of nickel in waste waters that can be tolerated by
      aerobic and anaerobic  biological treatment  processes.
      The studies included the determination  of the  efficiency
      of the processes in removing nickel.
E-15  "Limits for Toxic Wastes in Sewage Treatment",  Coburn,
      Stuart, Sewage Works Journal,  Vol. 21,  No.  3,  p.  522 (1949)

           This paper reviews some of the deleterious effects of
      industrial wastes on municipal treatment systems.   The
      question of pretreatment standards is also  discussed.
E-16  Controlling  the Effects of Industrial Wastes on Sewage
      Treatment.   Masselli,  et.al.,  Technical Report prepared
      for the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control
      Commission  by Wesleyan University,  June 1970, 62 pp.

           Factors involved  in the joint  treatment of industrial
      and domestic wastewaters are discussed.  A discussion on
      the composition of domestic and industrial wastes, the
      functions of a treatment plant, the effects and control
      of industrial wastes,  and a monitoring and analysis
      program are included.   Major industrial processes are
      reviewed and their wastewaters described.  Recommendations
      are made for a control program which maximizes treatment
      and minimizes deleterious effects on treatment systems.
                              7- 62

-------
E-17  "Anaerobic Processes", Pohland, F.G. and S. J. Kang,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 43,
      No. 6, p. 1129  (June 1971).

           This article reviews the 1970 literature on the
      microbiology and mechanisms involved in anaerobic pro-
      cesses, and on the factors inhibiting these processes.
E-18  "Mercury in Anaerobic Sludge Digestion", Lingle, James W.
      and Edward R. Hermann, Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 47, No. 3, p. 466  (March 1975).

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine whether
      mercuric chloride in various concentrations are converted
      into methyl mercury in the anaerobic sludge digestion
      process.  The distribution of mercury within the digester
      was also determined.
E-19  "White Water Treatment", Rudolfs, William and H. R. Amberg,
      Sewage and Industrial Wastes, Vol. 24, No. 10, p. 1278
      (October 1952).

           Laboratory studies determined the effect of various
      concentrations of soluble sulfide upon the anaerobic
      digestion process.  White water and sodium acetate were
      used as substrate in these studies.
E-20  "Digestion Fundamentals Applied to Digester Recovery -
      Two Case Studies", Dague, Richard R., et. al., Journal of
      the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol.  42, No. 9,
      p. 1666  (September 1970).

           The authors attempted to interpret the theory of
      anaerobic digestion as applied to digester operation.
      They report the experiences encountered in solving the
      problems of two anaerobic digester upsets.
E-21   "The Effects of Heavy Metals and Toxic Organics on Activated
       Sludge", Goss, Thomas A., Masters Thesis. University of
       Pittsburgh  (1969).

           Manometric techniques were used to determine the rela-
       tive respiration  rates of nonacclimated activated sludge
       to various  heavy  metals and organics.  Threshold  limits of
       sludge  to these components were determined.
                               7- 63

-------
E-22  "Effect of High Sodium Chloride Concentration on Trickling
      Filter Slimes", Lawton, Gerald W, and Clarence Eggert,
      Sewage and Industrial Wastes, Vol. 29, No. 11, p. 1228
      (November 1957) .

           Pilot plant studies were conducted to determine whether
      trickling filter slimes can satisfactorily stabilize organic
      matter in saline wastes.  The effect of these wastes on
      growths already developed was investigated.  Both acclimated
      and non-acclimated slimes were examined.
E-23  Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants,
      Beychok, M.R, , John Wiley & Sons, N. Y.,  1967.

           Pollutants found in petroleum and petrochemical waste-
      waters and their environmental effects are discussed.
      Effluent quality standards from several governmental
      authorities are included.
E-24  "Effects of Copper on Aerobic Biological Sewage Treatment",
      McDermott, Gerald N., et.al., Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 35, No. 2, p. 227 (February 1963).

           Pilot plant studies were conducted to determine the
      effects of copper on biological treatment systems.  BOD
      removal efficiencies were determined under steady feed and
      slug doses of copper feed.  No-effect concentrations are
      given.
E-25  "Field Survey of Four Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants
      Receiving Metallic Wastes", Earth, E.F., et.al., Journal
      of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 37, No. 8,
      p~I1101 (August 1965) .                  ~~

           Four municipal wastewater treatment plants that
      receive metallic wastes were sampled for treatment effici-
      ency. Metal distribution among the individual treatment units
      was  determined.  Concentration levels that cause no reduc-
      tion in treatment plant efficiency are also given.
                            7-64

-------
E"26  Treatability of Oil and Grease Discharged to Publicly
      Ownea Treatment Works, U. S. Environmental Protection
      Agency, EPA No. 440/575/066, Pretreatment Requirements
      for Oil and Grease, April, 1975.

           This document discusses the available methods for
      the removal of oil and grease from waste streams.  Other
      items discussed include the method of analysis and
      currently acceptable concentrations for oil and grease.
E-27  Toxic  Materials Analysis of Street Surface Contaminants/
      Office of Research and Development, U. S. EPA Report
      #R2-73-233,  August 1973.

           Metal loading from road surface runoff is tabulated
      and compared to normal sanitary sewage flow.  The relation-
      ship between metals in runoff and metals in sewage treat-
      ment plant effluent is made, to evaluate the effect on
      receiving waters.  The effect that collecting runoff in
      a combined system will have on biological systems is
      explored.  A table summarizes metal concentrations neces-
      sary to cause reduction in biological treatment systems.
E-28  "Annual Report - Control of Toxic and Hazardous Material
      Spills in Municipalities", Brinsko, G.A.,  Allegheny County
      Sanitary Authority., November 4, 1974.

           This demonstration project, partially funded by the
      EPA, involves developing a comprehensive program for the
      management and control of hazardous materials in the
      Allegheny County Sanitary Authority municipal wastewater
      treatment and collection system.  The program will include
      the development of an early warning system with appropriate
      monitoring and surveillance equipment to permit the plant
      to respond operationally to shock loadings of contaminants.
      The demonstration grant is composed of seven specific tasks
      which include:

           1.  Literature and Source Review
           2.  Inventory
           3.  Pilot Plant Evaluation
           4.  Monitoring and Surveillance Systems
           5.  Contingency Plan
           6.  Operational Modifications to the ALCOSAN Plant
           7.  Surcharge, Financing and Legislation

      This summary deals with work accomplished during the first
      year of this two-year project.
                           7-65

-------
E-29  A Handbook on the Effects of Toxic and Hazardous Materials
      On Secondary Biological Treatment Processes, A Literature
      Review, Environmental Quality Systems, Inc., Rockville,
      Maryland, prepared for the Allegheny County Sanitary
      Authority and the EPA, Sept. 1973, unpublished.


           A major goal of this work, was to provide background
      information relating to the effects of toxic and hazardous
      materials on the performance of biological treatment pro-
      cesses.  In addition, background information was collected
      on the effects of biological processes on toxic materials.
      The information is presented in four sections:  an intro-
      duction, the matrix of toxic and hazardous material infor-
      mation, the list of references used to generate the tabular
      matrix, and a supplementary list of chemicals.
E-30  "Effects of Alum Addition on Activated Sludge Biota",
      Anderson, Douglas T. and Mark J. Hammer, Water and Sewage
      Works, Vol. 120, No. 1, p. 63 (Jan. 1973)

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      effect of aluminum sulfate (alum) addition to the activated
      sludge process.  The influence of alum on higher life forms
      and on BOD removals were examined.  A comparison was made
      between effects on domestic and synthetic (glucose-glutamic
      acid substrate) wastewater.


E-31  "Literature Review", Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 46,  No. 6, p. 1034(June, 1974).

           A review of the preceding year's literature is
      presented, including:

           1.   Treatment  technology  for major  industrial effluents
               including  paper,  dairy, chemicals,  petroleum,
               plating, meat,  fish,  poultry, and fermentation(phar-
               maceuticals, corn, sugar)  industries.

           2.   Sampling and analysis techniques for  continuous
               monitoring,  organic and inorganic chemicals.

           3.   Physical-chemical waste treatment methods.

           4.   Microbiology and  mechanisms  of  anerobic processes.

           5.   Sources, fate,  effects  of metals and  other trace
               elements.

           6.   The identification, interactions, inhibitions of
               waste  treatment microbiota.


                            7- 66

-------
E-32   "Activated  Sludge  Studies with  Phenol  Bacteria",  Radhakrishnan,
       I., and A.  K.  Sinha  Ray, Journal of  the Water  Pollution
       Control Federation.  Vol. 46, No. 10, p. 2393  (Oct.  1974).

           A series  of laboratory  studies  were  conducted  to
       determine the  concentrations of phenol that can be  metabolized
       by Bacillus cereus bacteria.  Also studied were nitrogen-
       deficient conditions,  temperature variations,  and the
       results of  contaminating the culture with wastewater.
 E-33   "Biological Treatability of Trinitrotoluene Manufacturing
       Wastewater", Nay, Marshall W. Jr., et.al., Journal of
       the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 3,
       p. 485  (March,  1971)

           Laboratory studies were conducted to define the amen-
       ability of neutralized wastewater from the counter-current,
       continuous flow trinitrotoluene  (TNT) manufacturing process
       to biodegradation.  The feasibility of using biological
       processes for treatment of the wastewater was also evaluated.
E-34   "Toxicity of  Copper to Activated Sludge," Ayers,  K.  C.
       et.  al.,  Proceedings of the 20th Industrial Waste
       Conference (1965)Purdue University.

            This article  summarizes studies  carried  out  at
       Ohio State University in which attempts  were  made to
       investigate the  actual mechanism causing partial  failure
       of the  activated sludge process due to shock  loadings of
       copper. A description of the pilot plant and  the  results
       of the  experiments are presented. The work of previous
       investigations  is  also discussed.
 E-35  "The Effects  of Sulfides  on Anaerobic Treatment",  Lawrence,
       Alonzo W.,  et.al.,  Proceedings of 19th Industrial  Waste
       Conference, Purdue  University (1964), p.  343.

            The effects of soluble and insoluble sulfides on anaero-
       bic  treatment were  investigated by the operation of a series
       of laboratory digesters receiving daily sulfide additions.
       Experimental  results were discussed with respect to toxic
       concentrations of soluble sulfides.  Possible  methods for
       controlling and eliminating sulfide toxicity were  also
       indicated.
                                7- 67

-------
E-36  "Slug of Chromic Acid passes Through a Municipal Treatment
      Plant", English, J. N., et.al.,  Proceedings of 19th Indus-
      trial Waste Conference (1964) ,  Purdue University, p. 493.

           A field study was undertaken to determine the effects
      of passage of a chromic acid slug on the efficiency of a
      municipal sewage treatment plant.  In addition to the levels
      of chromium in the plant processes attributable to the
      chromic acid slug, background data on the concentrations of
      chromium, copper, zinc and nickel are also presented.
E-37  "Cation Toxicity and Stimulation in Anaerobic Waste Treat-
      ment II.  Daily Feed Studies", Kugelman, Irwin J. and p. L.
      McCarty, Proceedings of 19th Industrial Waste Conference
      (1964),Purdue University, p.667. Also presented in the
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,  Vol. 37,
      p. 97 (1965).

           Laboratory studies to investigate cation effects under
      daily feed conditions on anaerobic waste treatment systems
      are reported.  These studies provide the sanitary engineer
      with data which can be used to design waste treatment sys-
      tems.  Cation concentrations are examined singly and in com-
      bination to determine synergistic and antagonistic effects.
E-38  "Determination of Biodegradability Using Warburg Itespirometric
      Techniques", Hunter, J. V. and H. Heukelekian, Proceedings
      gf the 19th Industrial Waste Conference (1964) , Purdue
      University, p. 616.

          .Laboratory studies are reported which examine the
      Warburg Respirometer as a biodegradability technique.  Its
      applications, procedures for use, interpretations, and the
      advantages and disadvantages inherent in its use are also
      presented.
E-39  "The Role of Iron in Anaerobic Digestion", Pfeffer, John T,
      and James E, White, Proceedings of the 19th Industrial Waste
      Conference, (1964)  Purdue University, p. 887.

           Laboratory studies are reported examining the relation-
      ship between iron loading and digester efficiency.  The role
      of iron in reducing soluble phosphate concentrations by
      precipitation is studied, and the relationship between soluble
      phosphate concentration and digester efficiency is examined.
                              7-68

-------
E-40  "Substrate Interaction during Shock Loadings to Biological
      Treatment Processes", Komolrit, K. and A. F. Gaudy, Jr.,
      Proceedings of the 19th Industrial Waste Conference,  (1964)
      Purdue University, p. 796.  Also presented in the Journal
      of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 38, No. 8,
      p. 1259  (August,
           Laboratory  studies were conducted under severe shock
      loading conditions to examine substrate dependence of sequen-
      tial substrate removal phenomena.  A metabolic flow chart
      for various carbohydrates and related sugar alcohols shows
      the metabolic pathways.
E-41   "Effect of High Concentrations of Individual Volatile Acids
       on Anaerobic Treatment, McCarty, Perry L. and Marc Brosseau,
       Proceedings of the  18th Industrial Waste Conference  (1963),
       Purdue University,  p.  283.

           Laboratory studies were  conducted to investigate the
       effects of high concentrations of volatile acids individually
       and in combination  on  the digestion of sewage sludge.  The
       purpose was to determine whether volatile acid buildup is
       the cause or effect of digester upset.
E-42   "A Procedure  for  Continuous Nitrification  Corrections
       During Warburg  Respirometer Studies", Symons, James, and
       Roger LaBonte,  Proceedings of  the  18th  Industrial Waste
       Conference  (1963), Purdue University, p.498.

           Background and  a  discussion of oxygen uptake due to
       nitrification during Warburg Respirometer biodegradation
       studies  is  reported  in this article.  The paper  includes a
       discussion  on possible solutions,  theoretical considerations
       and  correction  possibilities in order to deal with the nitri-
       fication problem.
 E-43  "The Physical  and  Biological  Effects  of  Copper  on Aerobic
      Biological Waste  Treatment Processes",  Moulton, Edward Q. ,
      and Kenesaw S.  Shumate,  Proceedings  of  the  18th Industrial
      Waste Conference  (1963) , Purdue  University,  p.
            Laboratory  studies were  conducted  to  explain  the  effects
       of  copper  toxicity  on  aerobic biological treatment systems.
       The effects  of copper  dosage  on  BOD  and COD  are  examined.
       An  explanation of the  path  and fate  of  copper  ions is
       proposed.
                              7-69

-------
E-44   "Effect of Boron on Aerobic Biological Waste Treatment",
       Banerji, Shankha K, , et.al., Proceedings of the 23rd
       Industrial Waste Conference (1968), Purdue University, p. 956

            Laboratory studies are reported on the effects of
       boron on an activated sludge system.  The effects of dif-
       ferent concentrations of boric acid on the growth and on
       the substrate removal rate of acclimated activated sludge
       is indicated.  Settling characteristics of the sludge are
       examined and a literature review of the effects of boron
       on treatment processes and on aquatic life is included.
E-45   "Development of Biological Treatment Data for Chemical
       Wastes", Ford, Davis L., et.al., Proceedings of the 22nd
       Industrial Waste Conference (1967), Purdue University,
       p. 292.

            Laboratory experiments were conducted to develop
       design criteria for chemical wastes.  The feasibility of
       treating industrial wastewaters on a laboratory scale
       is examined.
E-46   "Carbon as a Parameter in Bacterial Systems Growth Limi-
       tation and Substrate Utilization Studies", Rickard, M.D.
       and W. H. Riley, Proceedings of the 20th Industrial Waste
       Conference (1965) , Purdue University, p. 98.

            The utility of carbon analysis to trace the metabolism
       of organic compounds is surveyed.  The relationships obtained
       among cellular carbon, exogenous soluble carbon and viable
       count during bacterial growth are examined with the rates
       of synthesis of cellular material.
E-47   "Effect of Acrylonitrile on Anaerobic Digestion of Domestic
       Sludge", Lank, John C. Jr., and Alfred T. Wallace, Pro-
       ceedings of the 25th Industrial Waste Conference  (1970) ,
       Purdue University, p, 518.                  ~~

            Laboratory studies were conducted to examine the effects
       of acrylonitrile on anaerobic digestion.  Included is a
       literature survey on the effects of acrylonitrile on aquatic
       life and aerobic biological treatment.
                               7-70

-------
E-48   "Trace Metals and Filamentous Microorganism Growth",
       Pfeffer, John T., et.al., groceedings of the 20th Indus~
       trial Waste Conference (1965) , Purdue University, p. 608,

            Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine
       the trace metal requirements that are necessary for bac-
       terial and fungal growth.
E-49   "Some Effects of High Salt Concentrations on Activated
       Sludge", Kincannon, D.F. and A. F. Gaudy, Jr., Proceed-
       ings of the 20th Industrial Waste Conference  (1965),
       Purdue University, p. 316.Also presented in the Journal
       of th*> Water Pollution Control Ffid«ration, Vol. 38,
       No. 7, p. 1148  (July 1966).

            Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine
       the effects of shock loadings of high salt concentrations
       on sludges developed in waters with low salt content.  Con-
       versely, the effects of fresh water on sludges developed
       in a salt water medium were also examined.  Settling
       characteristics, removal efficiencies and cellular compon-
       ents were indicated.
E-50   "The Effect of Surface Active Agents on Substrate Utiliza-
       tion in an Experimental Activated Sludge System", McClelland,
       Nina I. and K. H. Mancy, Proceedings of the 24th Industrial
       Waste Conference  (1969) p. 1361.

            Laboratory studies to determine the effect of ABS
       (alkylbenzene sulfonate) and LAS  (linear alkylate sulfon-
       ate) on the performance of an activated sludge system are
       reported.  The mechanism of interference with activated
       sludge systems of compounds with surface active character-
       istics is also presented.
E-51   "Combined Treatment of Chemical Wastes and Domestic Sewage
       in Germany", Bischofsberger, Wolfgang, Proceedings of the
       24th Industrial Waste Conference  (1969), Purdue University,
       p. 920.

            Pilot plant studies were conducted to determine whether
       chemical wastes needed to be treated separately or could
       be combined with domestic sewage.  Basic criteria for plant
       design were developed for a combined activated sludge
       system.
                               7-71

-------
E-52  "Factors Responsible for Non-Biodegradability of Indus-
      trial Wastes," Irvine, Robert L. Jr. and A. Busch,
      Proceedings of the 24th Industrial Waste Conference
      (1969), Purdue University, p. 903.

           This paper discusses some basic concepts in bio-
      chemistry that can be used to understand the true mean-
      ing of biodegradability-  The article indicates how these
      concepts may be used to develop new treatment practices.
      It points out that some materials that are termed "non-
      biodegradable" may be degradable under a different set
      of conditions.

E-53  "Composition Studies of Activated Sludges," Burkhead,
      Carl E. and Samuel Waddell,  Proceedings of the 24th
      Industrial Waste Conference  (1969), Purdue University,
      p. 576.

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      change in chemical composition of activated sludges
      grown in batch fed units with various pure organic sub-
      strates.  Energy-synthesis data were also collected to
      more completely define the chemical changes taking place
      throughout all phases of the growth cycle.


E-54  "Sludge Activity Parameters and Their Application to
      Toxicity Measurements and Activated Sludge," Patterson,
      James W. et al., Proceedings of the 24th Industrial
      Waste Conference  (1969), Purdue University, p.127.

           This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages
      of standard treatment unit monitoring methods.  Other
      specific biochemical parameters and their applicability
      to activated sludge systems under toxic stress are dis-
      cussed.  A procedure for ATP(adenosine triphosphate)
      analysis for use as a quantitative measurement of
      microbial biomass and activity is also included.


E-55  "Chlorinated Hydrocarbons:  Emerging Implications in
      Regional Planning," Shea, Timothy and Williams Gates,
      Proceedings of the 24th Industrial Waste Conference
      {1969), Purdue University, P. 1448.

           A study was conducted to develop estimates of
      chlorinated hydrocarbon emissions in municipal and
      industrial wastewaters and in water and sediments in
      the San Francisco Bay-Delta region.  A mass balance of
      pesticide transport into and from the Bay System was
      also discussed.
                              7- 72

-------
E-56  "Dissolved - Copper Effect on Iron Pipe," Cruse/ Henry,
      Journal of the American Water Works Association, Feb.,
      1971, p. 79.

           Several case studies are presented to show the
      corrosion effects of galvanized iron pipe as a result of
      copper concentrations as low as .01 mg/1.  Copper sources
      include water supply, copper addition for algae control
      and copper pipe upstream of the iron pipe.


E-57  "Identification and Testing of Compatible Industrial
      Wastes," Hastings, P. C. and M. W. Davis, Jr., Proceedings
      of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference  (1972), Purdue
      University, p. 515

           Laboratory studies are reported which examine two
      wastes  (Kraft mill bleachery waste of the caustic stage
      and aluminum containing waste) which mixed together cause
      a physiochemical reaction resulting in precipitation of
      organic and inorganic materials.  Location of plants with
      a view towards joint treatment of compatible wastes is
      suggested.


E-58  "Effect of Chrome Plating Wastes on the Warsaw, Indiana
      Treatment Plant," Erganian, George K., Proceedings of
      the 14th Industrial Waste Conference (1959) Purdue
      University, p.127.

           An evaluation of the effect of chrome plating wastes
      on the operation of an activated sludge plant is reported.
      Relationships between chrome concentration and treatment
      efficiency, sludge index, and return sludge concentration
      are presented.  Consideration is given to the need for
      ferrous sulfate as a pretreatment device for chrome
      bearing wastes.  Chrome removals as a result of treatment
      are also examined.


E-59  "Significance of a Highly Alkaline Industrial Waste In a
      Municipal Waste Water Treatment Plant," Leary, R. D.,
      et. al., Proceedings of the 26th Industrial Waste Conference,
      (1971), Purdue University, p. 566.

           The effect of a high alkaline - high chromium content
      glue and gelatin plant waste on a primary treatment plant
      is reported.  Laboratory study results are also presented
      on the effects of these wastes on anaerobic digestion.
      Data is provided on treatment plant performance before
      and after discharge of the trade waste.
                                7- 73

-------
E-60  "Some Effects of Copper on the Activated Sludge Process,"
      Directo, Leon S. and Edward Moulton, Proceedings of the
      17th Industrial Waste Conference (1962) , Purdue
      University, P. 95

           The results of pilot plant studies to evaluate the
      response of activated sludge to various situations are
      presented in this article.  Responses to shock loadings
      of copper under varying organic loadings and to various
      suspended solids concentrations are both reported.


E-61  "The Effect of ABS Shock Loadings on the Activated
      Sludge Process," Bennett, E. R. and D. W. Ryckman, Proceed-
      ings of the 16th Industrial Waste Conference (1961) ,
      Purdue University, p.52.

           Laboratory studies were conducted to investigate
      the effect of shock loadings of ABS on the activated
      sludge system and to gain an insight into the mechanism
      involved in the interaction of ABS and the activated
      sludge microorganisms.  The results of these tests are
      presented in this paper.


E-62  "The Effect of Whey Upon the Operation of an Activated
      Sludge Plant," Backmeyer, D. P., Proceedings of the 3rd
      Industrial Waste Conference (1947), Purdue University,
      p. 310.

           This paper discusses the experiences encountered by
      an activated sludge treatment plant as a result of batch
      and continuous doses of whey.


E-63  "Effects of Synthetic Detergents on Activated Sludge,"
      Manganelli, R. M., Proceedings of the 4th Industrial
      Waste Conference,  (1948), Purdue University, p. 611.

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      effects of anionic, cationic and nonionic detergents
      at various pH levels on activated sludge organisms.  The
      results of these studies are reported in this paper.


E-64  "Some Revised Concepts Concerning Biological Treatment,"
      Sawyer, Clair N. et al., Proceedings of the 9th Industrial
      Waste Conference (1954), Purdue University, p. 217.

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      effect on biological treatment of:  fluctuating temperature,
      fluctuating pH levels and starvation periods.  The study
      results are presented in this paper.


                                7-74

-------
E-65  "University of Toronto Studies Reveal Toxic Metals in
      Sludges Used for Soils," Water and Sewage Works,
      Vol. 120, No. 7, p. 50  (July, 1973).

           Metal concentrations were measured by atomic
      absorption from three different dried sludge sources:
      heavily populated and industrialized, residential and
      a large town with industries-one of which uses chrome.
      Concentrations for cadmium, chromium, lead, nickel,
      zinc, iron, manganese and copper from each of the sludges
      is reported.  In recognition of this toxic metals threat,
      Ontario established guidelines for sludge disposal.


E-66  "Inhibition of Aeration Process :  A Quantitative Assess-
      ment of Some Toxic Materials," Burrows, M. G., Water
      Pollution Control, Vol. 68, No. 4, p. 457. (1969)

           A method is described by which, it is contended, the
      cost of treating trade effluents containing inhibitory
      substances can be developed by the use of laboratory-
      scale activated sludge units.


E-67  "Some Effects of Zinc on the Performance of Laboratory
      Scale Activated Sludge Units," Brown, P. and P. R. Andrew,
      Water Pollution Control, Vol. 71, No. 5, pp. 549-554
      (1972) .

           A laboratory investigation was carried out to deter-
      mine the effects of zinc on batch type activated sludge
      units.  The test results are presented in this article.


E-68  "Lead-Cadmium and Endotoxin Interactions," Luzio, Nicholas
      R., Paper presented to the Senate Commerce Committee,
      Subcommittee on Environment. February 26, 1973.

           Laboratory studies were used to determine the effect
      of lead and cadmium intake in animals on their ability
      to fight off bacteria.  Different animals were used,  and
      lead or cadmium was administrated to the animals along with
      endotoxins, and the results were reported.
                               7- 75

-------
E-69  "Temperature Acclimation in Aerobic Bio-oxidation
      Systems," Benedict, Arthur H. and D. A. Carlson, Journal
      of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 45,
      No. 1, P. 10 (Jan. 1973).

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      effects of high and low temperatures on micro-organisms
      and on performance efficiency of biological treatment
      systems.  Acclimation of mixed cultures at low and at
      high temperatures were examined.


E-70  "Toxic Effects of Mercury on the Activated Sludge Process,"
      Ghosh, Mriganka, and Paul Zugger, Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 45, No. 3, P. 424
      (March, 1973).

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      concentrations of mercury that exhibit toxic effects on
      the activated sludge process.  The results of the study
      are reported in this article.


E-71  "Response of Completely Mixed Systems to Hydraulic Shock
      Loads," George, Thazhethil, K. and Anthony F. Gaudy, Jr.,
      Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, Proceed-
      ings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 99,
      Number EE5, p. 593  (October 1973).

           Laboratory tests were used to determine the effects
      of hydraulic shock loads on activated sludge processes.
      Two types of shock loads were studied.  The first was a
      constant feed concentration.  The second involved a com-
      pensating change in feed substrate concentration, so that
      the daily organic loading remained constant, called
      "constant daily organic loading."  Results of the experi-
      ments are given.


E-72  "Response of Activated Sludge to Organic Transient Loadings,"
      Adams, Carl E. and W. Eckenfelder, Jr., Journal of the
      Sanitary Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American
ings
.  3:
      Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 96, p. 333  (April 1970).

           Laboratory studies were undertaken to evaluate the
      effects of organic loadings under steady state and tran-
      sient conditions upon the activated sludge system.  Sub-
      strate removal and oxygen uptake kinetic models were
      examined to determine if these equations could be utilized
      to predict system responses under transient  loadings.
                              7-76

-------
E-73  Biological Waste Treatment, Genetelli, E. J. , Department
      ot Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture
      and Environmental Science, Rutgers University, New Bruns-
      wick, New Jersey, 35 pp.

           The available methods of biological waste treatment,
      with their different process modifications are presented.
      In addition, a discussion on shock loadings (both quantita-
      tive and toxic) and their affect on biological systems
      is included.


E-74  "Toxicity Measurements in Activated Sludge," Hartmann,
      Ludwig and Gerhard Laubenberger , Journal of the Sanitary
      Engineering Division, Proceedings of the American Society
      of Civil Engineers, Vol. 94, No. 2, p. 247  (April, 1968) .

           This paper discusses different methods of handling
      toxicity data, and the problems and difficulties that
      can arise in toxicity measurements.  The Michaels
      and Menten, Warburg, and Lineweaver and Burk Methods are
      discussed, with laboratory experiments used to demonstrate
      their application.


E-75  "Toxicity Measurements in Activated Sludge," Closure,
      Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, Proceedings
      of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 96, No .
      S.A. 2  (April, 1970)

           This closure discusses several points from article E-74
         concerning the Michaels and Menten equations.


E-76  "Settling Characteristics of Sludge Sedimented from
      an Industrial Effluent Containing Lead Compounds,"
      Christian, J. R. and D  Dollimore, Water Research, Vol. 5,
      No. 5, p. 177  (1971).

           The effect of the presence of oil on the settleability
      of sludge containing some ledd is examined.  Laboratory
      studies examine settling rate, and solids concentration
      before and after oil removal.


E-77  "Measurement of Toxicity of Industrial Wastes," Banerji,
      S. K. et. al., Proceedings of the 3rd Mid-Atlantic
      Waste Conference, p.
           This paper discusses a method for quantitatively
      assessing the toxicity of wastewater ingredients which
      affect biological wastewater treatment.  The authors
      use boron as an example to compare the theoretical cal-
      culations to the actual laboratory data.
                            7-77

-------
E-78  "Effects of Metallic Ions on Biological Waste Treat-
      ment Processes/1 Reid,  George W. et al., Water and
      Sewage Works, Vol.  115, No.  7, p. 320,  (July 1968).

           Laboratory studies were conducted to observe the
      effects of metallic ions on slime and on digester
      efficiency.  The study included various concentrations
      of chromium, cadmium and copper.  Pilot plant studies
      were carried out to determine the effect of metallic
      ions on trickling filter BOD removal efficiencies, and
      on metallic uptake by attached slimes.


E-79  "Effects of Pesticides on Raw Wastewater," Canter, L. W.
      et. al., Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 116, No. 6,
      p. 230,  (June, 1969).

           Laboratory studies are reported which examine the
      toxic effects of dieldrin, endrin and the organic solvents
      utilized in commercial pesticide products.  Their effects
      on domestic sewage and on Escherichia coli are also
      examined.
E-80  "Effects of Heavy Metals on Microorganisms.  Application
      to Process Design," Heck II, Robert P. et. al.,
      Proceedings of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference,
      (1972), Purdue University.

           This paper discusses the use of laboratory monitor-
      ing techniques to determine the effects of heavy metals
      on microorganisms used in biological waste treatment.
      A discussion of how this data can be applied to process
      design is also included.  Laboratory tests were conducted
      with copper as the "toxic" material to demonstrate the
      methods discussed, and the results of the tests are pre-
      sented.
E-81  "Sulfide Saturation for Better Digester Performance,"
      Masselli, Joseph W. et. al., Journal of the Water
      Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 39,  No. 8, p. 1369
      (August, 1967).

           Laboratory experiments were conducted to examine
      the effects of sulfide saturation of digester sludge
      on gasification.  The precipitation of metals to their
      insoluble sulfides can eliminate metallic shock to anaerobic
      digestion.
                            7-78

-------
E-82  "Elemental Analysis of Wastewater Sludges from 33
      Wastewater Treatment Plants in the United States,"
      Salotto, B. Vincent et. al., from the draft report
      Proceedings of the Research Symposium on Pretreatment
      and Ultimate Disposal of Wastewater Solids, Rutgers
      University, New Brunswick, N. J.  (May 21-22, 1974).

           Analyses of raw and digested sludges for their
      metal content are reported in this paper.  Statistical
      distribution, general tendencies, and deviations of the
      data for 21 metals are included.  Comparison of the
      data with sources outside the United States is made.
      An analysis of sludge samples for nitrogen, phosphorus,
      sulfur, and heat of combustion was also made.


E-83  "Effect of Industrial V?astes on Oxidation Pond Performance,"
      Moshe, Meir et. al., Water Research, Vol. 6, No. 10,
      p. 1165  (Oct. 1972).

           Laboratory experiments were  conducted to establish
      the toxicity criteria of different metal ions on oxida-
      tion pond operation.  Metal ion concentration and pH
      levels are examined in relation to algal numbers and
      dissolved oxygen content.


E-84  "Toxic Effects of Cupric, Chromate and Chromic Ions on
      Biological Oxidation," Lamb A., and E. L. Tollefson,
      Water Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, p. 599  (April, '1973).

           The toxic effects of cupric, chromate and chromic
      ions under conditions of shock loading on a laboratory
      activated sludge system are presented.  The relationship
      between toxic effect and suspended solids concentration
      is also examined.


E-85  "Effect of Temperature on the Removal of NTA  (Nitrilotriacetic
      Acid) during Sewage Treatment," Eden, G. E., et. al.,
      Water Research, Vol. 6, No. 8, p. 877  (August, 1972).

           Experiments to determine NTA biodegradation by
      activated sludge processes  are reported.  The effects
      of temperature are also examined  to predict the impact
      of winter conditions on NTA removals.
                              7- 79

-------
E-86  "The Role of Sulfide in Preventing Heavy Metal Toxicity
      in Anaerobic Treatment," Lawrence, Alonzo Win., and
      Perry L. McCarty, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 392  (March 1965)

           Laboratory studies were performed to determine the
      effects of copper, zinc, nickel and iron concentrations
      individually and in combination on anaerobic digestion.
      The role of sulfide in preventing heavy metal toxicity
      was also evaluated.  The investigation examined sulfide
      addition as a control procedure to relieve metal toxicity.


E-87  "Resistance of Carcinogenic Organic Compounds to Oxidation
      by Activated Sludge," Malaney, G. W. et. al., Journal
      of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 39, No. 12,
      p. 2020,  (Dec. 1967)

           Laboratory studies were conducted to investigate
      the ability of activated sludge treatment plants to remove
      carcinogenic compounds from wastewater.  The ability of
      three activated sludges to oxidize selected compounds
      was tested and the results are presented in this article.


E-88  "The Influence of Trivalent Chromium on the Biological
      Treatment of Domestic Sewage," Bailey, D. A. et. al.,
      Water Pollution Control, Vol. 69, No. 2, p. 100  (1970)

           Pilot plant studies were undertaken to determine
      concentration levels of trivalent chromium that are accept-
      able to biological treatment processes.  The effects of
      chromium on digestion, trickling filtration and activated
      sludge performance were studied and are reported in this
      article.


E-89  "Biochemical Response of Continuous Flow Activated Sludge
      Processes to Qualitative Shock Loadings," Komolrit, K.
      and A. F. Gaudy, Jr., J_ourn_al__pf the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 38,No.~T, p. 85  (January, 1966)

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      mechanism of substrate interaction  in a continuous flow
      activated sludge system.  Variables considered included
      the combinations and ratios of different substrates, con-
      centration levels and modes of introducing substrates.
      The shock load responses at various ratios of BOD and Nitrogen
      were also investigated.
                                7-80

-------
E-90  "The Effect of Kraft Pulp Mill Effluents on the Growth
      of Zalerion Maritimum," Churchland, L. M. and M. McClaren,
      Canadian Journal of Botany, Vol. 50, p. 1269 (1972).

           Laboratory studies are reported which measured the
      growth of marine fungus in Kraft pulp mill effluents.
      A determination of Z.maritimum as an effective decomposer
      of caustic effluent is also conducted.


E-91  "Tolerance of High Salinities by Conventional Wastewater
      Treatment Processes," Ludzack, F. J. and D. K. Noran,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 37, No. 10, p. 1404  (October, 1965)

           This article reports the results of laboratory tests
      to determine the effects of varying concentrations of
      chlorides upon activated sludge and anaerobic digestion
      units during sustained operation.  The performance of
      treatment units were evaluated under slug doses,starva-
      tion periods and varied feed rates.


E-92  "The Effects of Surface Active Agents on Aeration,"
      Mancy, K. H. and D. A. Okun, Journal of the Water Pollution
      Control Federation, Vol. 37, No. 2, p. 212  (February, 1965)

           This study analyzed theoretically and experimentally
      the effect of surface active agents on oxygen transfer
      kinetics.  The article explained how surface active agents
      interfere with aeration efficiency in waste treatment
      processes.


E-93  "Effects of EDTA on Wastewater Treatment," Potos, Chris,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 37,
      No. 9, p. 1247  (Sept. 1965)

           This paper reports on the research program initiated
      to determine the effect of EDTA on several components of
      sewage treatment.  Included are the effects of EDTA on
      secondary sedimentation, coliform numbers, oxygen utiliza-
      tion, wastewater oxidation and chemical coagulation.
                             7-81

-------
E-94  "The Response of Activated Sludge to Nitrogen Deficient
      Conditions," RamaRao, C. V. et. al., Journal of the
      Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 37, No. 10,
      p. 1422 (October 1965).

           Pilot plant studies were conducted to evaluate
      modifications of the activated sludge process that would
      effectively treat nitrogen deficient wastewaters.  The
      purpose of the study was to investigate nitrogen economy
      in the treatment of certain trade wastes, and the study
      results are presented in this paper.


E-95  Identification and Control of Petrochemical Pollutants
      Inhibitory to Anaerobic Processes, J. C. Hovious et.al.,
      EPA Bulletin No. PB-222-287, 111 pp. April, 1973.

           Laboratory studies were conducted to identify
      materials that are potentially inhibitory to anaerobic
      processes using an unacclimated biomass.  A number of
      petrochemical pollutants and their inhibitory concentrations
      are given.


E-96  "The Effect of Temperature on the Removal of Non-Ionic
      Surfactants during Small Scale Activated Sludge Sewage
      Treatment - I," Stiff, M. J. et. al., Water Research,
      Vol. 7, p. 1003  (1973).

           Laboratory studies indicated the differences in
      biodegradation of three non-ionic surface active materials
      at 15 C, 11 C and 8 C.  Comparisons are made with
      operating results from a small sewage treatment plant.
E-97  "The Effect of Temperature on the Removal of Non-Ionic
      Surfactants during Small-Scale Activated Sludge Sewage
      Treatment - II Comparison of a Linear Alkyl Phenol
      Ethoxylate with Branched-Chain Alkyl Phenol Ethoxylates,"
      Stiff, M. J. and R. C. Rootham, Water Research, Vol. 7,
      p. 1407  (1973).

           Laboratory studies were conducted to investigate the
      differences between the biodegradation of a linear alkyl
      phenol ethoxylate surfactant and two branched-chain
      alkyl phenol ethoxylates during sewage treatment.  Linear
      alkyl benzene sulphonate  (LAS) was also tested to study
      its removal under varying conditions of temperature.
                             7- 82

-------
E-98  "A Mathematical Model for the Continuous Culture of
      Microorganisms Utilizing Inhibitory Substrates/1
      Andrews, John F., Biotechnology and Bioengineering,
      Vol. 10, p. 707 (1968).

           A mathematical model is presented for both batch
      and continuous cultures of microorganisms utilizing
      inhibitory substrates.  The model uses an inhibition
      function to relate substrate concentration and specific
      growth rate.
E-99  "Effects of Pesticides on Nitrite Oxidation by Nitrobacteria
      agilis," Winely, C. L. and C. L. Clemente, Applied
      Microbiology, Vol. 19, No. 2, p. 214  (Feb. 1970).
           The influence of pesticides on the growth of N.
      agilis in aerated cultures and on the respiration oT
      N. agilis cell suspensions and cell-free extracts are
      presented in this article.  The effects of eight pesti-
      cides on growth and on nitrite oxidation are also reported.


E-100 "The Influence of Metal Ion Concentrations and pH value
      on the Growth of a Nitrosomonas Strain Isolated from
      Activated Sludge," Loveless, J. E. and H. A. Painter,
      Journal of General Microbiology, Vol. 52,  (1968).

           Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
      effects of metal concentrations on the growth of pure
      cultures, and the consequences of deficiencies of these
      metals.  The effects of pH and temperature are considered.
      The article includes a literature survey on factors affect-
      ing the growth of Nitrosomonas.


E-101 "Effect of Chemical Structure on the Biodegradability
      of Aliphatic Acids and Alcohols," Dias, F. F. and M.
      Alexander, Applied Microbiology, Vol. 22, No. 6, p. 1114
                 W
(December, 1971).

     Laboratory studies were undertaken to determine the
rate of decomposition of substituted acids by sewage
microorganisms.  The type, number, and position of the
substituents were factors that were considered to deter-
mine the susceptibility of a compound to attack.
                              7-83

-------
E-102  "The Effect of Phenols and Heterocyclic Bases on
       Nitrification in Activated Sludges," Stafford, D. A.,
       Journal of Applied Bacteriology, Vol. 37, p. 75  (1974).

            Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the
       rates of ammonia and nitrite oxidation when various con-
       centrations of phenols or cresols were added to activated
       sludge.  Concentrations at which nitrification is affected
       are reported in this article.


E-103  "Accumulation of Methanogenic Substrates in CC1,
       Inhibited Anaerobic Sewage Sludge Digester Cultures,"
       Sykes, Robert and E. J. Kirsch, Water Research, Vol. 6,
       p. 41, (1972).

            Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine
       the effect of carbon tetrachloride (CC1.) on methane
       production in sludge digesters.  Mechanisms for hydrogen
       production as a result of methane disruption are also
       reported.

E-104  "The Toxicity of Cadmium to Anaerobic Digestion:
       Its Modification by Inorganic Anions," Mosey, F. E.
       Water Pollution Control, Vol.  70, p. 584 (1971).

            A laboratory study was undertaken to investigate
       the role of the sulphide and carbonate ions in prevent-
       ing cadmium toxicity in anaerobic digestion.  The study
       investigated steady additions, shock doses, and pH
       variations to determine their effect on cadmium toxicity.
       The study results are reported in this article.

E-105  "Factors Affecting the Availability of Heavy Metals to
       Inhibit Anaerobic Digestion," Mosey, J. D., et. al.,
       Water Pollution Control, Vol.  70, p. 668 (1971).

            Laboratory experiments were undertaken to examine
       the effect of metals on anaerobic digestion.  The purpose
       of the experiments was to explain reported variations in
       toxic concentrations and the study results are reported.
       This paper includes a discussion on techniques for measur-
       ing metal ions in solution.  Procedures are suggested
       for the prevention and correction of inhibition by metals.
                              7-84

-------
E-106  "Effect of Copper and Hexavalent Chromium On the Specific
       Growth Rate of Ciliata Isolated from Activated Sludge,"
       Sudo, Ryuichi and Shuichi Aiba, Water Research/ Vol. 7,
       p. 1301  (1973).

            The metal concentrations necessary to reduce the
       growth rate of three species of Ciliata were investigated.
       Growth rates were determined for both acclimated and non-
       acclimated cultures.
E-107  "Inhibition of Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge
       by Chlorinated Hydrocarbons," Swanwick, J. D. and Margaret
       Foulkes, Water Pollution Control, Vol.  70, p. 58,  (1971).

            The toxicity of  chlorinated hydrocarbons to anaerobic
       digestion  is  investigated.   Solids content, proportion
       of undigested solids,  level  of bacterial activity and
       presence of other toxicants  have been identified as
       important  variables influencing inhibitory effects.
 E-108   The  Impact of Oily Materials on Activated Sludge
        Systems,   Environmental Protection Agency, NTIS
        #PB  212-422,  EPA # 12050 DSH (March,  1971)

             Small scale continuous activated sludge systems
        were exposed  to a variety of oily compounds at various
        loading rates to observe the removal  performance  of
        the  systems.   Batch studies were used to determine
        oil  biodegradability,  and the effects of emulsification
        and  temperature on biodegradability were also observed.
E-109  "Effect of Toxic Wastes on Treatment Processes and
       Watercourses," Jackson, S. and V. M. Brown, Water
       Pollution Control, Vol.  69, p. 292  (1970).

            This paper reviews the effects of toxic wastes
       on aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and on fish.
       It identifies the level at which the toxic effects of
       some substances are likely to be most important.
       Concentrations are given for materials that are toxic
       to aerobic, anaerobic and nitrification processes as
       well as to fish.
                              7-85

-------
E-110 "The Effect of Chloroform in Sewage on the Production
      of Gas from Laboratory Digesters/1 Stickley, D. P,
      Water Pollution Control, Vol. 69* P- 585 (1970).

           The toxicity of chloroform contaminated sludge
      was investigated in laboratory experiments.  Continuous
      and slug doses of chloroform were administered to deter-
      mine the effect of various concentrations on gas pro-
      duction.  The results of the experiments are reported
      in this article.
E-lll "An Investigation into the Effects of Chlorinated Solvents
      on Sludge Digestion," Barrett, K. A., Water Pollution
      Control, Vol. 71, p. 389  (1972).

           Gas yields from laboratory digesters that were fed
      with chlorinated solvents were determined.  The effects
      of steady and shock doses and varying conditions of
      aeration, temperature, gas recirculation were also
      examined.
E-112 "Effects of Iron on Activated Sludge Treatment," Carter,
      John L. and Ross McKinney, Journal of the Environmental
      Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. EE2, p. 135
      (April, 1973).

           Laboratory experiments were conducted to- relate the
      iron ion concentration with the rate of biological
      metabolism.  Iron's effect on sludge bulking conditions
      in waste treatment plants was also examined.


E-113 "Temperature-Toxicity Model for Oil Refinery Waste,"
      Reynolds, James H. et. al., Journal of the Environmental
      Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. EE3, p. 557
      (June, 1974).

           Equations have been developed utilizing continuous
      flow stirred tank reactor kinetics and enzyme inhibition
      kinetics to describe the effects of temperature on toxicity
      to microorganisms.  These equations were tested by semi-
      continuous and continuous flow experiments with phenol
      and the alga Selenastrum Capricornutum.
                             7- 86

-------
E-114 "Metal Toxicity to Sewage Organisms," Poon, Calvin
      P- C. and Kiran Bhayani, Journal of the Sanitary
      Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SA 2, p. 161
      (April, 1971).

           Laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate
      the role of metal toxicity in the overgrowth of fungus
      in the activated sludge process.  Pure cultures of
      Geotrichum candidum and sewage bacteria culture were
      used to obtain an understanding of the toxic behavior
      through the use of an enzyme inhibition model.


E-115 "Environmental Effects of Photoprocessing Chemicals,"
      Proceedings of the National Association of Photographic
      Manufacturers Seminars on Photoprocessing and the
      Environment,(June, 1974).

           A series of papers are contained in these proceed-
      ings which cover a broad range of topics pertaining to
      Photoprocessing discharges including:  recycling and
      reuse of chemicals, treatability, properties of photo-
      processing wastes, and biological and chemical treatment
      of photoprocessing effluents.


E-116'Nitrogen Transformation in Activated Sludge Treatment,"
      Ganczarczyk, Jerzy, Journal of the Sanitary Engineering
      Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SA 3  (June, 1971).

           This article presents the experimental results of
      full-scale activated sludge treatment of an unbleached
      kraft pulp mill nutrient-deficient effluent.  The experi-
      ment was performed to determine the effect of nitrogen
      deficiency and nitrogen excess on treatment parameters.


E-117 "Industrial Wastes-Chemical Structures Resistant to
      Aerobic Biochemical Stabilization," Ludzack, F. J. and
      M. B. Ettinger, Journal of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Vol. 32, No. 11, p. 1173  (November, 1960).

           This review presents treatability data of various
      compounds to facilitate comparisons and clarify relations
      between chemical structure and microbiological assimilation,
      Biodegradability of hydrocarbons, alcohols, phenols,
      aldehydes, acids, salts, esters, ethers, ketones, sur-
      factants, amino acids, nitrogen compounds, vinyl and
      oxy compounds are tabulated and discussed.
                              7- 87

-------
E-118   Interaction of Heavy Metals and Biological Sewage
        Treatment Processes,U. S. Department of Health
        Education and Welfare, Environmental Health Series,
        Water Supply and Pollution Control, Pub. No. 999-WP-
        22, 201 pp.  (May, 1965).

             This publication is a collection of 10 research
        papers originating at the Robert A. Taft Sanitary
        Engineering Center.  The articles describe the effects
        of chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc on sewage treat-
        ment processes.  Results of pilot plant studies and
        full scale municipal plants are given.


E-119    Correlation of Advanced Wastewater Treatment and
        Groundwater Recharge,  Beckman, Wallace J. and Raymond
        J. Avendt, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
        Project R-801478, Program Element 1BB043, Roap/Task
        21 ASB-30.

             With regard to a proposed 5 MGD demonstration
        facility on Long Island, New York, Advanced Wastewater
        Treatment  (AWT) schemes required for reclamation and
        ground water recharge were evaluated.  A review of the
        theory and practice of AWT and ground water recharge
        methods is included.
E-120   "Anaerobic Waste Treatment Fundamentals;  Part III,
        Toxic Materials and Their Control," McCarty,  P.  L.,
        Journal of Public Works, November,  1964.

             Four methods of controlling materials toxic to
        anaerobic waste treatment are proposed.   Concentrations
        of materials that are inhibitory to anaerobic digestion
        are also presented.


E-121   Water Quality Criteria, Second Edition,  McKee, Jack
        Edwards and Harold W.Wolf/The Resources Agency of
        California, State Water Resources Control Board,
        Publication No. 3-A, 548 pp.  (1963).

             This book is the result  of an investigation of
        technical and scientific literature pertaining to the
        criteria of water quality for various beneficial uses
        of water.  Included is a condensation and critical
        evaluation of the literature, and an extensive list
        of references.  A summary of  the legal literature is
        also included.

             Discussions on specific  pollutants,  including
        radioactivity, pesticides and surface active agents
        are presented.

                               7- 88

-------
E-122   "The Effect of Mercury on the Activated Sludge Process,"
        Zugger, Paul D. and Mringanka M. Ghosh, Proceedings of
        the 27th Industrial Waste Conference  (1972), Purdue
        University, p. 792.

             Laboratory scale aerobic batch cultures of micro-
        organisms, similar to those found in the activated
        sludge treatment process, were used to determine the
        effects of slug doses of mercury on activated sludge
        systems.  A table which includes the 96 hour median
        tolerance limit in fish for certain metals is also
        indicated.  A description of the laboratory equipment,
        procedures, and results is presented.


E-123   "A Discussion on Inhibition of Anaerobic Digestion of
        Sewage Sludge by Chlorinated Hydrocarbons," Swanwick,
        J. D. and Margaret Foulkea,Water Pollution Control,
        Vol. 70, p. 573,  (1971).

             This paper is a discussion of article E-107.
E-124   "Organic Load and the Toxicity of Copper to the
        Activated Sludge Process," Salotto, B. V. et. al.,
        Proceedings of the 19th Industrial Waste Conference
        TI964), Purdue University, p. 1034

             Activated sludge pilot plant studies investigated
        the effect of organic loading on the toxicity and
        distribution of copper in the various treatment processes,
        The effects of two copper concentrations (one and five
        mg/1) were studied at each organic loading condition.
        Determinations of COD, suspended solids, BOD, turbidity
        and copper at various outlets were used to measure these
        effects.  The ultimate fate of copper is examined.
E-125   "Anaerobic Processes," Ghosh, S. and F. G. Pohland,
        Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
        Vol. 42, No. 6, p. 920  (June 1970).

             This article reviews the 1969 literature on
        anaerobic processes as they pertain to wastewater
        treatment.  Induced are reviews of microbiology
        and mechanisms of the process, process developments
        and kinetics, analytical methods and control, amd process
        applications.
                               7-89

-------
E-130   Hexane Extractable Materials and Problems at
        Municipal Treatment Plants, Metropolitan Sanitary
        District of Greater Chicago, Department of Research
        and Development, Report No. 75-9, May, 1975.

             Data on the treatability and fate of Hexane
        Extractable Materials (oil and grease) as observed
        at MSD treatment facilities are presented.  Accounts
        of operational problems and secondary effects on
        sludge disposal are also reported.


E-131   Treatability of Oil and Grease Discharged to Publicly
        Owned Treatment Works, USEPA, #440/1-75/066, April, 1975.

             The general nature of oil and grease in wastewater
        is presented in this document.  The effects of oil and
        grease on the removal capabilities of various wastewater
        treatment processes is also described.


E-132   "U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Policy on
        Municipal Sludges," Whittington, W. A., and B. L. Seabrook,
        prepared for U.S./U.S.S.R. Seminar, Handling, Treatment
        and Disposal of Sludges, Moscow, U.S.S.R.

             This summarizes EPA's Technical Bulletin, Acceptable
        Methods for the Utilization of Disposal of Sludges.
        This paper also describes the important factors to
        consider for planning sludge management programs.
E-133   Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Recycling
        Municipal Slu
        July 9-13, 19
E-134
Municipal Sludges and Effluents on Land, Champaign, 111.,
             7T.
             This document contains reprints of more than two
        dozen papers concerned with recycling of sludge and
        effluents by land application.  A broad range of
        topics pertinent to this subject are discussed in
        detail.
Proceedings of the National Conference on Municipal
Sludge Management, Pittsburcft, Pa..  June 11-13. 1974.

     More than two dozen papers are presented on all
aspects of municipal sludge management, including
specific information on substances  present in trace
amounts in sewage sludges.
                              7-90

-------
E-126   "Toxic Effects of Ammonia Nitrogen in High-Rate
        Digestion," Melbinger, N. R. and J. Donnellon,
        Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
        Vol. 43, No. 8, p. 1S58  (August, 1971).

             Case studies are reported on two digesters that
        were upset from the rate of nitrogen ammonia formation.
        Methods of digester recovery and nitrogen ammonia control
        are discussed.  A discussion by H. Zablatzky follows
        this article and includes a review of nitrogen ammonia
        effects on biological treatment.


E-127   "Anaerobic Processes," Ghosh, S., Journal of the Water
        Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 45, No. 6, p. 1063
        (June, 1973).

             This article reviews the 1972 literature on anaerobic
        processes as they pertain to wastewater treatment. Included
        are reviews of microbiology and mechanisms of the process,
        toxicity and inhibition, process developments and control,
        and process applications.


E-128   "Effect of Boron on Anaerobic Digestion," Banerji, S. K.
        and P. R. Parikh, Proceedings of the 4th Mid-Atlantic
        Industrial Waste Conference  (1970).

             Laboratory scale tests were used to determine the
        effect of boron on anaerobic digestion.  Doses from
        1-3 mg/1 boron fed as boric acid was tested on a glucose
        and acetate fed batch digester.  The analytical techniques
        and the results of the experiments are discussed.


E-129   Correlation of Advanced Wastevrater Treatment and
        Ground Water Recharge, Beckman, W. J., and R. J. Avendt,
        prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
        Office of Water Program Operations.

             This document reviews advanced wastewater treatment
        processes and their applicability to renovation of
        wastewater for ground water recharge.  Included is a
        detailed discussion of the nitrification processes,
        and the effects of certain inhibitory substances.
                              7- 91

-------
E-135   Wastewater Treatment and Reuse by Land Application,
        Volume I - Summary, Volume IT, Report, U. S. EPA,
        #660/2-73-006, August, 1973.

             These booklets present the results of a nationwide
        study on current practices of land application of muni-
        cipal treatment plant effluents and industrial wastes.
        Land application techniques, such as irrigation, over-
        land flow and infiltration-percolation are described,
        and the results from operational systems are indicated.
        Climate, health, and economic considerations are also
        addressed by the study-


E-136   Review of Landspreading of Liquid Municipal Sewage Sludge
        U.S. EPA, #670/2-75-049 GPO Stock No."055-001-01024,
        96 pp.

             This study reviews the state-of-the-art of land-
        spreading of liquid municipal sewage sludge.  The
        information was obtained from a questionnaire sent to
        1900 sewage treatment plants and from available literature.
        The subjects discussed in the booklet include sludge
        characteristics, sludge handling, economics of land-
        spreading, sludge-soil-plant interactions, public health
        considerations and land acquisition.


E-137   Renovation of Secondary Effluent for Reuse as a Water
        Resource, U. S. EPA, #660/2-74-016, February, 1974,
        495 pp.

             Land application of secondary treated, chlorinated
        wastewater is described in this study.   500,000 gpd of
        water was applied to cropland and forestland by means
        of sprinkler irrigation.  The effect of the water on
        crop yields and crop composition was studied and is
        reported.  Other factors that were considered included
        the quantity and quality of recharge to the ground water
        and the costs of spray irrigation systems.

E-138   Evaluation of Land Application Systems, U.S. EPA,
        # 430/9-75-001, March, 1975, 181 pp.
             This document offers guidance on how land appli-
        cation of sewage treatment effluent should be incor-
        porated into regional planning studies.  A checklist
        of factors to consider is presented with background
                              7- 92

-------
E-138  (continued)
        information to aid in their evaluation.  The document
        is divided into sections on wastewater management plans,
        design plans and specifications, and operation and
        maintenance manuals.


        For additional information pertaining to this section,
        please refer to the following articles.

             A-l                F-5
             A-2                F-7
             A-23               F-14
             A-31               F-17
             A-32               F-29
             C-17               F-32
             D-33               F-66
             D-41               F-85
                                F-90
                             7-93

-------
       SECTION F  -  REMOVAL OF  POLLUTANTS  IN PUBLICLY OWNED
                     TREATMENT WORKS

             Reference:   Volume I,  Section F
                         Volume II  - Appendix 6
F-l  "Acclimation of Microorganisms for the Oxidation of Pure
     Organic Chemicals", Mills, E.J., Jr.  and Vernon T. Stack,
     Jr., Proceedings of the 9th Industrial Waste Conference,
     (1954)  Purdue University, p. 449.

          This paper presents the results  of tests to determine
     the acclimation of microorganisms to  selected organic
     compounds.   The microorganisms were taken from the Kanawha
     River in West'Virginia, and the organic compounds considered
     consisted of amines, butyl carbitol acetate, acetanilide,
     acrylonitrile and glycols.
F-2  "Activated Sludge Treatment of Cyanide, Cyanate and
     Thiocyanate",  Ludzack, F.J. and R.  B.  Schaffer,
     Proceedings of the 15th Industrial  Waste Conference,
     (1960)  Purdue  University, p.  439.

          Laboratory tests were performed on test feeds com-
     posed of cyanides, cyanates and thiocyanates to determine
     the biological treatability of each.  The nature of degrada-
     tion mechanism was examined,  and the responses to several
     variables were studied. Acclimation of the activated
     sludge, loading rates and efficiencies were also indicated
     for each compound.
F-3  "Metabolism of Organic Sulfonates by Activated Sludge",
     Symons, James M.  and L. A.  Del Valle-Rivera, Proceedings
     of the 16th Industrial Waste Conference, (1961)  Purdue
     University, p. 555.

          This article presents  the results of laboratory
     tests to determine the mechanism of biological degrada-
     tion of aromatic  sulfonates (synthetic detergents)  by
     activated sludge.  The relationship between the structure
     of a compound and its biodegradability for various sul-
     fonates is studied.
                            7- 94

-------
F-4  "Biological Oxidation of Phenols in a Trickling Filter",
     Graves, B. S. , Proceedings of the 14th. Industrial Waste
     Conference, (1959), Purdue University, p.l.

          This paper indicates the results of adding phenols
     to a domestic waste stream, and how the phenols are
     removed by a conventional secondary (trickling filter)
     treatment plant.
F-5  "Experimental Treatment of Organic Cyanides by Conventional
     Sewage Disposal Processes", Ludzack, F.J., et.al
     Proceedings of the 14th Industrial Waste Conference, (1959)
     Purdue University, p. 547.

          A bench scale activated sludge unit was used to test
     the treatability of nitriles and their effect on the acti-
     vated sludge.  The effect of nitriles on anaerobic diges-
     tion was also presented.  Results of acclimation tests with
     various nitriles and alternate methods of removing nitriles
     were also discussed.
F-6  "Evaluating Treatability of Selected Industrial Wastes",
     Jorden, William L. et. al, Proceedings of the 26th Indus-
     trial Waste Conference,  (1971), Purdue University, p. 514.

          This paper presents a procedure for evaluating treat-
     ability of industrial wastes using a continuous flow,
     bench scale completely mixed, slurry reactor.  The theory
     of mixed systems and the equipment and procedure recom-
     mended is outlined, as are the results of treatability
     tests.  The purpose of these tests is to utilize the
     results as a design basis for treatment plants.
F-7  "Treatability of Wastewater from Soluble Coffee Manufacturing",
     Hammer, Mark J., et. al, Proceedings of the 26th Industrial
     Waste Conference,  (1971) , Purdue University, p. 348.

          This article examines the treatability of soluble
     coffee manufacturing wastes, separately and jointly with
     domestic waste.  The waste characteristics are presented
     for the coffee wastes, and the bulking effect on activated
     sludge that the coffee causes is examined.
                                7-95

-------
F-8  "Performance of Regionally Related Wastewater Treatment
     Plants", Adams, B.J. and R, S. Gemmel, Journal of the
     Water Pollution Control Federation, Volume 45 No. 10,
     p. 2088 (October, 1973)

          The variation of plant performance data for activated
     sludge plants in the Chicago area is contained in this
     article.  A statistical analysis of the BOD, SS, and  DO  in  the
     discharge of the plants is also presented.
F-9  "Treatment of Combined Aircraft Overhaul and Domestic
     Wastes", Rhodes, G. H., et. al., Journal of the Water
     Pollution Control Federation, Volume 45, No. 12, p. 2549
     (December, 1973)

          The Jacksonville Naval Air Station had been treating
     industrial wastes and domestic wastes separately, and
     neither discharge had met local standards.  A study was
     undertaken to consider joint treatment of these wastes.
     The procedure used in the study is presented in this
     article.  The characteristics of both waste streams and
     operating results from the combined treatment plant are
     contained.
F-10 "Stability and Removal of Commercial Dyes from Process
     Wastewater", Porter, John J., Pollution Engineering,
     Vol. 5, No. 10, p. 27,  (October, 1973).

          This article presents a description of commercial
     dye characteristics and their rate of degradation in
     water.  The effect of various waste treatment systems
     (biological, reverse osmosis, carbon adsorption, coagula-
     tion, radiation-oxidation and lime precipitation) on
     dyes is explored.
F-ll "Industrial Wastes Treated by Activated Sludge", Clinton,
     M.O,, Proceedings of the llth Industrial Waste Conference,
     (1956), Purdue University, p. 88.

          A general discussion of how two Wisconsin municipal
     sewage treatment plants upgraded themselves through acti-
     vated sludge to meet the increased discharges from local
     food processing plants is presented.
                            7-  96

-------
F-12  "Removal of Low-Level Radioisotopes from Wastewater by
      Aerobic Treatment", Lawrence, C. H. and F. W.  Gilcress,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 37, No. 9, p. 1289 (September, 1965)

           Pilot plant removal studies of low-level radionuclides
      from wastewater are presented.  The removal of various
      radioactive chemicals by primary sedimentation, trickling
      filtration, secondary sedimentation and lagooning was
      measured.  The mechanism of removal was explored and
      the effect of radioactive materials on treatment plant
      efficiency was examined.
F-13  "How to Treat Polystyrene Wastewater", Mason, Wallace
      and Gerald S. Allen, Industrial Wastes, September/October
      1974  p. 31.

           A process description of two pretreatment plants
      treating polystyrene wastewater is presented.  Influent
      and effluent data, sludge disposal data and general
      cost information is included.
F-14  "Biodegradation of Oleates", Williams, J. and E. 0.
      Bennett, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federa-
      tion, Vol. 45, No. 8, p. 1671 (August, 1973).

           A laboratory study investigating the biodegradability
      of commercially available oleates and hydroxyoleates is
      presented.  Degradation was determined by the growth of
      P. aeruginosa.   Factors influencing biodegradation,
      such as oleate concentration, metal interference and
      purity of the substrate are investigated for a variety
      of oleates.
F-15  Evaluation of Processes Available for Removal of Phosphorus
      from Wastewater, Cecil, Lawrence K.,  U. S. EPA Contract
      114-12-581, EPA No. 17010 DRF, July,  1972.

           The most important phosphate removal processes (bio-
      logical, lime, aluminum and iron) are evaluated for a
      variety of criteria.  The points of application of phos-
      phate removal processes in existing and new facilities
      are discussed with the alternative sludge disposal methods.
      A partial list of treatment plants where phosphorus re-
      moval capability exists, or is planned, is presented,
      including capacity, type of removal and P level in the
      effluents.  A short capital and operating cost section
      is included.

                                7-97

-------
F-16  "The Factor of Treatability as Applied to Industrial
      Effluents", Finch, John, Water Pollution Control,
      Volume 66, Number 2, p.  141 (1967).

           This article reviews some of the literature on the
      interrelationships between industrial discharges and
      municipal plants.  Some  guidelines for dealing with admin-
      istrative problems are also included.
F-17  "Biological Degradation of Wastes Containing Certain
      Toxic Chemical Compounds", Howe, Robert H.L., Proceedings
      of the 16th Industrial Waste Conference, (1961)  Purdue
      University, p. 262.

           The biological  degradation of several pharmaceutical
      wastes is discussed  in this paper.  The results  of some
      laboratory scale and some actual plant removals  of anti-
      biotics , phenol-mercury compounds, hormones and  organics
      containing formaldehyde and methyl alcohol are presented.
      The toxicity and inhibitory effects of some of these
      compounds are also indicated.
F-18  "Pretreatment of Toxic Wastes",  Chalmers,  R.  K.,  Water
      Pollution Control, Volume 69,  p. 281 (1970)


           This general article discusses the problems  of toxic
      wastes and what pretreatment alternatives  are available
      to reduce or eliminate toxic discharges.
F-19  "Constraints to Spreading Sewage Sludge on Cropland",
      U.  S.  EPA,  News of Environmental Research in Cincinnati,
      May 31,  19 iT.                                           '

           This article discusses the parameters that limit
      the use  of  sewage sludge on cropland.   Factors which
      are considered include nitrogen, metals, pathogens,
      odors, etc.  The areas where research  and guidance are
      needed are  outlined.
                             7- 98

-------
F-20  "The Biochemical Oxidation of Synthetic Detergents",
      Bogan, R.H. and C. N. Sawyer, Proceedings of the 10th
      Industrial Waste Conferencey(1955), Purdue University,
      p. 231

           A laboratory study utilizing the Warburg apparatus and
      the standard 5-day BOD test was conducted to determine
      the biochemical oxidation of a selected group of anionic
      and nonionic detergents.  Acclimation of various activated
      sludge seeds was also discussed.
F-21  "The Aerobic Metabolism of Potassium Cyanide", Nesbitt,
      John B, et.al., Proceedings of the 14th Industrial Waste
      Conference,  (1959) , Purdue University, p. 518.

           A laboratory  scale experiment was conducted to
      determine the feasibility of biological treatment of
      cyanide wastes.  The cyanide waste stream was treated
      by activated sludge in the absence of sewage, and re-
      moval data was presented.
F-22  "Fate and Effects of Trace Elements in Sewage Sludge
      When Applied to Agricultural Lands", U.S. EPA Bulletin,
      EPA 670/2-74-005  (January, 1974).

           The first part of this bulletin compiles and reports
      the results of published material dealing with the sub-
      ject title.  The second part explores the potential im-
      pact of sludge applications to land, including a review
      of the effect of various trace metals on crops and soils.
F-23  "The Treatment of Effluents from a Chrome Side Leather
      Tannery on a Conventional Biological Filter", Bailey,
      D. A., et.al., Water Pollution Control, Vol. 71, No.
      2, p. 202  (1972).

           Bench scale and pilot plant experiments indicated
      that biological  treatment can reduce the BOD of mixed
      effluents from a chrome side leather tannery to values
      acceptable to authorities in England.  Various pretreat-
      ment techniques were presented, and parameters discussed
      included chromium, sulfide and sludge produced.  The data
      generated can be used to compare pretreatment with  the
      cost of discharging to a municipal plant.
                             7-99

-------
F-24  "New England Examples of Joint Treatment of Municipal
      and Industrial Wastewaters", Parker, William H., III,
      Presented at the 47th Annual Conference of the WPCF,
      Denver, Colorado, (October, 1974)

           This paper lists the advantages and disadvantages
      of joint treatment and discusses sewer ordinances.  Case
      histories of engineering studies for Fitchburg, Mass.,
      Springfield, Mass., Concord, N. H., Lewiston-Auburn,
      Maine, and Adams, Mass, are presented and conclusions
      of joint studies are also presented.
F-25  "A Guide to the Selection of Cost-Effective Wastewater
      Treatment Systems", Van Note, R. H., et.al., U.S. EPA
      Contract No. 68-01-0973, (May, 1973).

           Flow sheets describing various unit processes asso-
      ciated with wastewater treatment and sludge handling are
      presented.  Curves depicting total cost in cents per
      thousand gallons of influent wastewater are shown for
      plant capacities ranging from 1-100 MGD.
F-26  "Removal of Metals by Physical and Chemical Treatment
      Processes", Maruyama, T., et. al., presented at the
      45th Annual Conference of the Water Pollution Control
      Federation, Atlanta, Georgia, October,1972.

           Pilot scale tests of coagulation, sedimentation,
      filtration and carbon adsorption are evaluated to deter-
      mine their removal capability on metals and toxic sub-
      stances.  A discussion of metals removal in conventional
      treatment processes is also contained.
F-27  "Sources of Metals in New York City Wastewater", Klein, L.A.
      et.al., Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 46, p. 2653  (December, 1974).

           Removal information from 12 New York City POTW's
      is presented.  Copper, chromium, nickel, zinc and cadmium
      removal data were based on daily flow proportioned samples
      combined into monthly composites.  The results from 21
      monthly averages are presented.
                            7-100

-------
F-28  "Regulating Latex Paint Wastes", Williams, Rodney, T.,
      Part 1 - Industrial Wastes,  July/August 1974, p.  34.
      Part 2 - Industrial Wastes,  Sept./Oct., 1974, p.  36.

           The treatability of latex paint wastes in East Bay
      Municipal Sewer District, Oakland, California, was determined
      by jar test methods, with the general conclusion  that this
      waste is treatable by activated sludge and chemical coagula-
      tion, either at the source or at the POTW.  A user
      charge system example is detailed.
F-29  "Heavy Metals Removal at Conventional Secondary Treatment
      Plants",  Altschuler, M.  and G.  Otakie, EPA,  internal
      correspondence,  December 20, 1974.

           Operating data from POTW's in  Byron,  Ohio;  Grand
      Rapids, Michigan;  Richmond, Indiana,  and Rockford,
      Illinois  are presented.   These  data were extracted
      from an HEW Report entitled, "Interaction of Heavy Metals
      and Biological Sewage Treatment Processes",  (1965).  Data
      from Alcosan and Muncie, Indiana POTW's are  presented
      and were  extracted from "Introduction of Heavy  Metals
      to Wastewater in Three Urban Areas",  by J. A. Davis,
      et.al (1974).  The information  is correlated and a dis-
      cussion of inhibitory effects is presented.
F-30  "Removal of Heavy Metals by Wastewater Treatment Plants",
      Esmond, S.E. , and A. C. Petrasek, Jr., Paper presented at
      Water and Wastewater Equipment Manufacturers Association,
      Industrial Water and Pollution Conference and Exposition,
      Chicago, Illinois, March 14-16, 1973.

           Dallas Demonstration Plant (1 MGD) removal data for
      12 metals is presented for two treatment processes:   an
      activated sludge process fed by primary effluent, followed
      by multimedia filtration, and the same activated sludge
      process, followed by high-lime treatment, multimedia
      filtration and granular activated carbon adsorption.
      Four month average data is presented.
                          7- 101

-------
F-35  Development of a Chemical Denitrification Process/
      Gunderloy, Frank C. et. al., EPA, NTIS No. PB 203 597
      72 PP-/ October, 1970.

           Laboratory studies of the denitrification process
      based on the copper catalyzed ferrous ion reduction
      of nitrate ion in basic media were conducted.  The
      purpose was to determine the effects of process variables
      on the extent of reduction, and on product distribution.
      Study results are presented in this article.


F-36  Biological Treatment of Chlorophenolic Wastes.  The
      Demonstration of a Facility for the Biological Treatment
      of a Complex Chlorophenolic Waste.Jacksonville, Ark.
      NTIS No. PB 206 813, 187 pp., June, 1971.

           Pilot plant studies were conducted to determine the
      biodegradability of Chlorophenolic wastes under actual
      field conditions.  Herbicide wastes were treated jointly
      with municipal wastes in an aerated lagoon located
      between a conventional sewage treatment plant and a
      stabilization lagoon.  The purpose of this project was
      to finalize the design, construction and operation for
      joint treatment of an industrial waste and a municipal
      waste.  The study included biological, chemical, hydraulic
      and overall considerations.
F-37  "Treatment of a Combined Wastewater by the Low-Lime
      Process," Tofflemire, T. J. and Leo J. Hetling,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 45, No. 2, p. 210,  (February, 1973).

           This article presents the results of a study to
      investigate the treatability of a 50:50 mixture of
      domestic waste and paper mill waste.  The studies were
      conducted on an actual waste flow in Waterford, N. Y.
      Conclusions and recommendations are both presented.


F-38  "Characteristics of Municipal Effluents,"Pound, Charles,
      and Ronald W. Crites, Conference on  Recycling
      Municipal Sludges and Effluent, Champaign, 111.,
      July 9-13, 1973.

           Physical, chemical, and biological characteristics
      of municipal wastewaters are presented and discussed.
      Constituents of raw wastewater and plant effluent are
      presented for four types of waste treatment plants.
      The wastes are compared to acceptable irrigation waters.
                            7- 102

-------
F-31  "Treatment Plant Designed for Anticipated Standards,"
      Schwinn, Donald E., Public Works, Vol. 104, No. 1, p. 54
      (January, 1973).

           This article reports on the design and construction
      of a wastewater treatment plant for the District of
      Columbia.  In addition to primary and secondary treat-
      ment facilities, plans include provisions for nitrogen
      and phosphorus removal.


F-32  "Degradation of a Cationic Surfactant in Activated
      Sludge Pilot Plants," Fenger, Bert H. et. al., Water
      Research, Vol. 7, p. 1195 (1973).

           Pilot plant activated sludge studies were used to
      describe and demonstrate the degradation of cationic
      surfactants.  Tetradecylaimethyl- benzlammonium chloride
      (TDBA) was chosen as a representative surfactant.  The
      removal of TDBA was studied, and the conditions which
      affect removal, such as protein presence, volumetric
      loading and temperature were noted.  The inhibition of
      non-acclimated activated sludge and the effect of shock
      loadings of TDBA were also investigated.


F-33  "Trace Elements in Sewage Sludges," Berrow M. L. and
      J. Webber, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
      Vol. 23, p. 93,  (June, 1972).

           The article presents an analysis of dried sewage
      sludges from 42 rural and industrial towns in England
      and Wales.  The levels of various metals in the sludges
      and in the soil are compared, and related to toxicity of
      vegetation.


F-34  "Biological Treatment of Cyanides, With and without
      Sewage," Pettet, A. E. J. and E. V. Mills, Journal
      of Applied Chemistry , August 4, 1954.

           This article discusses the results of a laboratory
      test used to determine the effect of cyanides on treat-
      ment of sewage with percolating filters.
                           7-103

-------
F-39  A Characterization of Heavy Metals in Sewage and
      in the Background Environment";ciougn, Kerrigan, G.,
      U. S. EPA, NERC - Cincinnati, June 15, 1972.

           This report is a summary of the current knowledge
      regarding environmental contamination by metals.  Major
      emphasis is given to metal concentrations in sewage
      effluents.


F-40  "Physical-Chemical Wastewater Treatment at Niagara Falls,
      N. Y. and Fitchburg, Mass.," Woodward, Richard L.,
      AlChE Symposium Series, Vol. II, Municipal Waste Treatment
      (1974).

           This paper discusses the reasons for selection of
      physical-chemical treatment and the design criteria used
      at the two sites.  The Niagara Falls plant is 48 mgd,
      and the Fitchburg plant is 15 mgd.


F-41  "Status Report on Niagara Falls AWT Facilities," Siriani,
      Josef, and Robert C. Marini, presented at the New York
      Water Pollution Control Association, Winter Meeting,
      January 22, 1974.

           This paper presents the background history of
      the Niagara Falls Project.  A description of the
      original pilot plant, design and construction of the
      full scale plant and industry's involvement and respon-
      sibility to the plant are all discussed.


F-42  Wastewater Treatment Technology, Patterson, J. W.
      et.al., State of Illinois Institute for Environmental
      Quality, 300 pp.,August, 1971.

           This report covers twenty-two chemical substances,
      and discusses their sources and treatment techniques.
      A general summary for each chemical, with references
      is also included.
F-43  "Rate of Phosphorus Uptake by Activated Sludge,"
      Wells, W. N., Water and Sewage Works  (January, 1975).

           This article describes an experiment to measure
      the phosphorus uptake by the activated sludge process
      Experimental results are presented.
                            7-104

-------
F-44   "Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Treatment Plant Effluents,"
       Dube, Douglas J. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution
       Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 5, p. 966 (May, 1974).

            A survey of polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB) in
       southeastern Wisconsin municipal wastewater treatment
       plants was conducted.  Gas chromatogram patterns were
       matched to those for Aroclor 1254.  Concentrations were
       given for influent and effluent from several treatment
       plants.

F-45   "Treatment of Oily and Metal Containing Wastewater,"
       Lin Y. H. and J. R. Lawson, Pollution Engineering,
       Vol. 5, No. 11, p. 45  (November, 1973).

            This article presents a series of tables which
       detail the sources, characteristics and treatment
       alternatives for oily wastes, often containing toxic
       metals.  Removal efficiencies and effluent concentrations
       of BOD, oil and suspended solids for characteristic
       waste streams are indicated for several treatment
       processes.

F-46   "Joint Treatment vs. Pretreatment of Food Processing
       Wastes," Watson K. S. et. al., Journal of the Water
       Pollution Control Federation,  Vol. 46, No. 8, p. 1927
       (August, 1974).

            The compatibility of dairy and food processing
       wastes with municipal sewage is discussed in this
       article.  The operational and economical advantages of
       joint treatment over separate treatment are indicated.
       A  successful example of joint treatment at a cheese
       manufacturing plant in Lowville, N. Y. is also presented.

F-47   "New Lake at South Lake Tahoe, California," Wakeman,
       R., Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 115, No. 8, p. 348
       (August, 1968).

            Removal efficiencies for BOD, COD, suspended
       solids, turbidity, phosphates, ABS and coliform are
       presented for the secondary and advanced portions of
       the South Lake Tahoe sewage treatment plant.
                             7-105

-------
F-48   "Wastewater Treatment Lures Industry," Larson R. L.,
       The American City, November, 1971, p. 74.

            A wastewater treatment facility has been built
       in Plant City, Florida to handle domestic sewage and
       waste from food processors and other industries.
       The key to the treatment program is an industrial waste
       ordinance, requiring industries to provide facilities
       for sampling, measuring flow, determining pH and
       temperature, and providing pre-treatment in the form
       of bar screens and pH adjustment.


F-49   "City - Industry Teamwork Solves Critical Wastewater
       Problems,"  Forestell, William IK. , The American City,
       July , 1973, p. 57.

            The South Charleston Waste Treatment Works receives
       petrochemical wastes from a large chemical plant and
       domestic sewage from South Charleston,  Separate
       primary treatment is provided for each waste, and the
       wastes are combined for secondary treatment.  The
       details of the plant operation and the BOD removals
       are reported in this article.


F-50   "Regional Plant Solves Small-Town Wastewater Problem,"
       Cuttica H. C. and R. A. Armstrong, The American City,
       July , 1974, p. 31.

            Two New York cities joined forces to form the
       Gloversville - Johnstown Sewer Board and build a treat-
       ment plant to handle domestic sewage and wastes from
       more than two dozen industries, including 20 tanneries,
       3 textile dyeing plants, and a large glue factory.
       The 13 mgd plant uses two-stage biological treatment.
       The first stage is a high-rate trickling filter and
       the second stage is activated sludge.  Removal of BOD
       and suspended solids has exceeded 90 percent.


F-51   "Trace Metals in Wastewater Effluents," Chen K. Y. et. al.,
       Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 46,
       No. 12, p. 2663 (December, 1974).

            An intensive study was conducted at the Hyperion
       Treatment Plant in Los Angeles to characterize trace
       metals in the effluents of various treatment processes.
       The partition of the metals into dissolved and particulate
       phases, and the size distribution of the particulate
       borne fractions in wastewater effluents and digested
       sludge were studied.


                             7-106

-------
F-52   "Carbon Treatment of a Municipal Wastewater,"
       Burns, D. E. and G. L. Shell, Journal of the Water
       Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 1, p. 148
       (January,1974).

            A pilot plant study was conducted in Salt Lake
       City to evaluate the use of activated carbon to remove
       soluble organic matter from municipal wastewaters.
       Carbon treatment in conjunction with chemical treatment
       was also studied.
F-53   "Effects of Equalizing Wastewater Flows," La Grega M. D.
       and John D. Keenan, Journal of the Water Pollution
       Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 1, p. 123  (January, 1974).

            A study was conducted in Newark, N. Y. to deter-
       mine the effects of maintaining a constant  flow of waste-
       water on treatment plant operation.  An equalization
       tank was used, and the effluent characteristics from
       constant flow and variable flow conditions  were compared.


F-54   Stability and Control of Anaerobic Digestion," Graef
       S. P. and Andreurs J. F., Journal of the Water Pollu-
       tion Control Federation, Vol.46, No.4, p.666
        (April, 1974).

            A computer was used to simulate the response of
       an anaerobic digester to organic, toxic and hydraulic
       overloading.  The factors that influence process stability
       and the indicators of impending digester failure were
       also studied.
F-55    "Adsorption of MBAS  from Wastewaters  and Secondary
        Effluents," Rickert,  D. A.  and  J. V.  Hunter, Journal of
        the Water Pollution  Control Federation, Vol. 46, No. 5,
        p. 911  (May,  1974).

            Methylene blue  active  substances (MBAS) can be
        divided  into  three groups on the basis of  adsorption
        characteristics.  The behavior  of each group and their
        interaction with  organics present in  wastewater are
        presented in  this article.
                              7- 107

-------
F-56   "Biodegradability and Treatability of Combined Nylon
       and Municipal Waste," Poon C. P. C., Journal of the
       Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 42, No. 1,
       p. 100 (January, 1970).

            A laboratory study was conducted to determine the
       feasibility of treating combined nylon and municipal
       wastewaters.   Nylon wastes contain high organic levels,
       solvents and low pH.  The most efficient operating
       parameters and the potential of solvent recovery are
       reported.


F-57  "Anionic Detergents in Wastewater Received by Municipal
      Treatment Plants," Earth E. F. and M. B. Ettinger,
      Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation,
      Vol. 39, No. 5, p. 815  (May, 1967).

            An 18 month study of 5 treatment plants to deter-
       mine the removal of methylene blue active substances
       (MBAS) is presented in this article.  The correlation
       of MBAS removals and COD removals is also indicated.
F-58   "Heavy Metal Uptake by Activated Sludge," Cheng, M. H.
       et. al.,  Journal of the Water Pollution Control
       Federation, Vol. 47, No. 2, p. 362(February, 1975).

            This article discusses the mechanism by which
       activated sludges remove metals from wastewaters.
       The factors which influence removal and the variation
       among different metals are also presented.


F-59   "Heavy Metal Removal by Acclimated Activated Sludge,"
       Neufeld Ronald D. and Edward R. Hermann, Journal of the
       Water Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 47, No. 2, P. 310
       (February, 1975).

            This article discusses the removal efficiencies
       of activated sludges that have been acclimated to levels
       of mercury, cadmium and zinc up to levels of 1000 rag/1.
       Biomass production,  respiration parameters and kinetic
       parameters are also indicated as a function of metal-
       sludge ratio.
                             7- 108

-------
F-eo   "Efficiency of Heavy Metals Removal in Municipal
       Sewage Plants," Brown H. G. et. al., Environmental
       Letters, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 103  (1973).

            During the first half of 1972 six municipal sewage
       treatment plants were routinely monitored to determine
       the efficiency of metals removal.  The plants chosen
       encompassed primary, trickling filter and activated
       sludge treatment in various size municipalities.  The
       metals that were measured in the influent and effluent
       were cadmium, chromium, copper, zinc and lead.  The
       removal efficiency for each metal and the relationship
       between metals removal and suspended solids removal
       are discussed in this article.


F-61   "The Fate of Chromium during the Treatment of Sewage,"
       Stones, T., Journal of the Institute of Sewage
       Purification, 1955, p. 345

            This article discusses the concentration changes
       that chromium undergoes during various unit operations
       of sewage treatment.  Operations discussed include
       sedimentation, chemical precipitation, biological
       filtration and activated sludge treatment.


F-62   "The Fate of Copper During the Treatment of Sewage,"
       Stones, T., Journal of the Institute of Sewage Purifi-
       cation, 1958, p. 82.

            The effects of sedimentation, chemical precipitation,
       biological filtration and activated sludge treatment
       on copper concentration changes are described in this
       article.
F-63   "The Fate of Nickel during the Treatment of Sewage,"
       Stones, T., Journal of the Institute of Sewage
       Purification,  1959, p. 252.

            This article indicates how nickel concentration
       is affected by sedimentation, chemical precipitation,
       biological filtration and activated sludge treatment.
                              7-109

-------
F-64   "The Fate of Zinc during the Treatment of Sewage",
       Stones, T. Journal of the Institute of Sewage Purifica-
       tion, 1959, p. 254.

            Zinc concentration changes have been studied during
       sedimentation, biological filtration, chemical precipita-
       tion and activated sludge treatment.  The study results are
       reported in this article.


F-65   "The Fate of Lead during the Treatment of Sewage,"
       Stones, T., Journal of the Institute of Sewage
       Purification, 1960, p. 221.

            This article discusses the concentration changes
       that lead undergoes during treatment by sedimentation,
       biological filtration, chemical precipitation and
       activated sludge.


F-66   ''Fate of Heavy Metals in Physical-Chemical Treatment
       Processes," Argaman, Y. and C. C. Weddle, AIChE
       Symposium Series - Water, 1973.

            Results are presented from a series of pilot plant
       studies on the removal of heavy metals using physical-
       chemical wastewater treatment processes.  The processes
       investigated were lime precipitation, ferric chloride
       precipitation, dual media filtration, and activated
       carbon adsorption.  The effect of nitrilotriacetic acid
       (NTA) on heavy metal removal efficiencies was also
       investigated.


F-67   Feasibility of Joint Municipal and Industrial Wastewater
       Treatment in the Onondaga Lake Watershed, Onondaga County,
       New York, Roy F. Weston, Inc., Final Report FWPCA Grant
       No. WPRD 66-01-68, September, 1970.

            Bench scale activated sludge studies were conducted
       at the Metropolitan Sewage Plant to determine heavy metals
       removal.  The results of these studies are presented in
       this report.
                               7- 110

-------
F-68   "Treatment of Coke Plant Phenolic Wastes in a Municipal
       Activated Sludge Plant," Mathews W. W.,  Proceedings of
       the 13th Industrial Waste Conference  (1968), Purdue
       University.~~

            The Gary, Indiana Sanitary District conducted
       an experiment to determine the effectiveness of phenol
       reduction by the activated sludge process.  The results
       of this experiment are presented in this paper, includ-
       ing all of the monthly operating data from the plant.


F-69   "Nutrient Removals by Conventional Treatment Processes,"
       Johnson W. K., Proceedings of the 13th Industrial Waste
       Conference  (1958), Purdue University.

            This paper presents a literature survey and
       operating data on the nitrogen content of raw sewage,
       and nutrient removals in primary, chemical and biological
       treatment plants.


F-70   "Design and Early Operating Experience of Activated
       Sludge Plant for Combined Treatment of Pulp, Paper
       and Domestic Waste," Coughlan F. P. Jr.  and A. E.
       Sparr, Proceedings of the 16th Industrial Waste
       Conference,(1961)Purdue University, p.  375.

            A secondary sewage treatment plant at Westernport,
       Maryland treats both kraft pulping wastes and domestic
       sewage.  Some of the early operating  experiences of
       this plant, including some removal characteristics,
       are presented in this article.


F-71   "Designing a Combined Treatment Works for Municipal
       Sewage and Packinghouse Wastes at Austin, Minnesota,"
       Hill, Kenneth V., Proceedings of the  13th Industrial
       Waste Conference  (1958), Purdue University, p.260

            This article describes the design of a sewage
       treatment plant for municipal and packinghouse wastes.
       Operating data and its comparison to  design data
       for a similar plant is also presented.
                             7-111

-------
F-72   "Treatability of Industrial Wastes in Combination
       with Domestic Sewage," Sawyer C. N. and P. A. Kahn,
       Proceedings of the 13th Industrial Waste Conference
       (1958),  Purdue University, p. 341.~~

            This article is a general discussion of factors
       which affect treatability of combined wastes.  Factors
       discussed include inert solids, fibrous materials, oils
       and greases, floating materials, flow variations,
       thermal variations, density variations, pH, toxic
       materials, BOD load variations, nutritional requirements,
       ferrous compounds, and odor-producing ingredients.


F-73   "BOD of Synthetic Organic Chemicals," Lamb C. B. et. al.
       Proceedings of the llth Industrial Waste Conference
       (1956),  Purdue University, p. 326.

            This article presents the BOD values of a wide
       range of synthetic organic chemicals.  The variations
       between the BOD value of wastewater effluents and the
       BOD values in streams is also discussed.
F-74   "Cyanide Destruction on Trickling Filters," Gurnham
       C. F., Proceedings of the 10th Industrial Waste Con-
       ference  (1955)Purdue University, p.186.

            Laboratory scale trickling filter experiments were
       conducted to determine the treatability of cyanide-
       bearing sewage.  The results of these experiments are
       discussed in this article.  A general discussion on
       simple and complex cyanide forms is also presented.


F-75   "A Biodegradability Test for Organic Compounds,"
       Bunch R. L. and C. W. Chambers, Journal of the Water
       Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 39, No. 2, p. 181
       (February, 1967).

            A specific laboratory procedure to determine
       biodegradability is described in this article.  The
       application of the test and the time required for its
       adaptation is also indicated.
                              7- 112

-------
F-76   "A Procedure and Standards for the Determination of
       the Biodegradability of Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate and
       Linear Alkylate Sulfonate,"  The Subcommittee on
       Biodegradation Test Methods of the Soap and Detergent
       Association, Journal of the American Oil Chemists
       Society, Vol. 42, No. 11, p. 986  (November, 1965).

            This article presents a procedure to measure the
       biodegradability of the compounds mentioned in the title.
       A semi-continuous activated sludge process to simulate
       sewage treatment and act as a confirming test is also
       described.


F-77   Treatment of Mixed Domestic Sewage and Industrial Waste
       in Germany, Organization for Economic Co-operation and
       Development, December, 1966.

            This extensive document covers all aspects of sewage
       treatment in Germany, including the pollution effects
       of sewage, pretreatment, design criteria and the
       industry charge systems in use.


F-78   "Solids Retention in Anaerobic Waste Treatment Systems,"
       Daque R. et. al., Journal of the Water Pollution
       Control Federation, Vol. 42, No.  2, Part 2, p. R29
       (February, 1970).

            This article presents the results of a laboratory
       study to determine biological solids retention times
       in anaerobic waste treatment systems.  Factors which
       affect retention times and methods for their control are
       also discussed.


F-79   "Techniques for Removing Metals from Process Wastewaters,
       Cadman, T. W. and R. W. Dillinger, Chemical Engineering,
       April 15, 1974, p. 79.

            This general article presents the state-of-the-art
       of most major methods of metals removal.   Strontium and
       manganese are discussed individually, and  a summary of
       the effects of many ion exchange  resins on metals  is
       also presented.
                               7= 113

-------
F-80   "Compact Activated Sludge Treatment of Combined
       Pretrochemical-Municipal Waste," Kumke G. W. et. al.
       Water and Wastes Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 5, p. Cl,
       (May, 1969).

            A four year evaluation of the activated sludge
       process performance of the South Charleston, West
       Virginia Waste Treatment Works was conducted.  Perfor-
       mance data on BOD, COD and suspended solids is presented
       in this article.


F-81   "Nitrogen Removal by Modified Activated Sludge Process,"
       Balakrishnan B.  and W.Eckenfelder, Journal of the
       Sanitary Engineering Division, Proceedings of the
       American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 96, No. SA2
       p. 7236  (April,  1970).

            Nitrification research studies with respect to the
       activated sludge and trickling filtration processes
       are reported in this article.  The effects of organic
       loading and hydraulic loading on nitrogen removal are
       also discussed.
F-82   "Removal of Sugars by Activated Sludge," Painter, H. A.
       et. al., Water Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, p. 427,  (1968).

            This article presents the results of laboratory
       experiments on the removal of sugars by activated sludge,
       The efficiency of sugar removal, the relationship
       between gluecose loading and sludge activity and the
       relationship between BOD loading and sugar removal are
       all discussed.
F-83   "Grease Management in Wastewater Treatment," Cibulka
       J. J. et. al.,  Proceedings of the 3rd Mid-Atlantic
       Waste Conference (1969).

            The grease removal efficiencies at a treatment
       plant with a grease removal chamber in Blacksburg,
       Virginia are reported in this article.  The results of
       a laboratory study are also presented.  Factors which
       affect grease removal are indicated and include pre-
       chlorination, primary sedimentation, pH, and retention
       time.
                             7-114

-------
F-84   "Treatability Studies of Industrial Wastes Effected
       through Process Simulation," Baker R. W. and F.
       Guillaume, Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 116, No. 9
       p. IW32 (September, 1969}	

            This article indicates how laboratory treatability
       studies can simulate treatment plant operations.  The
       laboratory studies can identify problems in advance
       of design and aid in their correction.


F-85   "Starch Removal with Non-Acclimated Activated Sludges,"
       Banerji S. K. et. al., Water and Sewage Works, Vol. 114,
       No. 4, p. 134  (April, 1967).

            A laboratory study was conducted to determine the
       mechanism and efficiency of starch removal by activated
       sludge.  The factors which  affect starch removal and
       the effect of shock loadings were also considered.
       The study results are presented in this article.


F-86   "Variability of Waste Treatment Plant Performance,"
       Thomann R. V., "Journal of  the Sanitary Engineering
       Division, Proceedings of the American Society of
       Civil Engineers, Vol. 96, No. SA3, p. 816  (June, 1970).

            Statistical techniques were  applied to the time
       variations of waste treatment processes of municipal
       plants.  Data were obtained from  eight plants,  and
       BOD was the major parameter considered.


F-87   "Removal of Metals by Chemical Treatment of Municipal
       Waste Water," Nilsson, Rolf, Water Research, Vol.  5,
       No. 2, p. 51  (1971).

            The reduction of the metal content of wastewaters
       by chemical precipitation with aluminum sulfate and
       calcium sulfate  is reported in this article.   The
       reductions of chromium,  lead, copper, mercury,  cadmium,
       arsenic, nickel and copper  are related  to  pH  and
       precipitant levels.
                              7-115

-------
F-88   "Heavy Metals in Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents,"
       Mytelka A. I., Journal of the Water Pollution Control
       Federation, Vol. 45, No. 9, p. 1859, (September, 1973).

            The Interstate Sanitation Commission routinely
       analyzes the metals removal capability of municipal
       wastewater treatment plants within its jurisdiction.
       This article presents the results from some of these
       analyses.

F-89   "Treatment of Mixed Sewage and Textile Finishing Wastes
       on Trickling Filters and Activated Sludge," Gibson F.
       M. and J. H. Wiedman, Proceedings of the 17th Industrial
       Waste Conference (1962), Purdue University.

            Pilot studies were conducted at the Greater Green-
       ville Sewer District, South Carolina, to determine the
       treatability of combined textile wastes and domestic
       sewage.  The economy of treatment and the relationships
       between removals and pH and alkalinity were also studied.


F-90   "Treatability of Oily Wastewater from Food Processing
       and Soap Manufacture," McCarty P. L. et. al., Proceedings
       of the 27th Industrial Waste Conference (1972),Purdue
       University, p.867.

            Laboratory investigations were conducted to deter-
       mine the treatability of pure fatty substances and selected
       industrial wastes from a Proctor and Gamble complex in
       Cincinnati, Ohio.  The removal efficiency of the treat-
       ment plant and the effect of the wastes on the activated
       sludge and anaerobic digestion processes are reported
       in this article.
F-91   "Amenability of a Mixture of Sewage, Cereal and Board
       Mill Wastes to Biological Treatment," Quirk, Thomas P.,
       Proceedings of the 13th Industrial Waste Conference
       (1958), Purdue University, p. 523.

            This article presents the results of a laboratory
       scale study to investigate the feasibility of treating
       a mixture of industrial wastes and domestic sewage
       by activated sludge.  The oxygen transfer rates observed,
       the process loading removal characteristics, the oxygen
       demand rates, the required detention times and the sludge
       handling characteristics are also discussed.
                             7-116

-------
P-92   "Combined Treatment of Tannery and Municipal Wastes,"
       Nemerow N. L. and R. Armstrong, Water and Wastes
       Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 7, p. D-6 (July, 1969).

            The results of laboratory experiments are pre-
       sented, which indicate that activated sludge, or a
       modification of the process, can be utilized to treat
       combined tannery and domestic wastes.


F~93   Removal of Heavy Metals by Conventional Treatment,
       Logsdon G. S. and J. M. Symons, reprinted from
       U. S. EPA Region II Report #902/9-74-001 (Traces of
       Heavy Metals in Water, Removal and Monitoring).

            This paper summarizes the research that has been
       conducted at the NERC laboratory in Cincinnati on removal
       of trace inorganic substances by water treatment processes,
       Among the chemicals discussed are methyl mercury,
       inorganic mercury, barium, selenates, selenites, arsenites
       and arsenates.

F-94   Performance  of Northern California and Pacific
       Northwest Municipal Treatment  Plants  in  Oil  and
       Grease Removal; CH2M Hill  Consulting  Engineers,
       Sacramento,  California.

            Removal and  sampling  data is presented  on  oil
       and grease and BOD  for  11  municipal plants.   Oil  and
       grease removals range  from 47.9  to 96.4% with an
       average removal for all 11 plants of  86.9%.

F-95   Performance  of New York and  Connecticut  Municipal
       Treatment Plants  in Oil and  Grease Removal;  Hydro-
       science,  inc.; Westwood, New jersey.

            Influent and effluent sampling  data on  oil and
       grease and BOD is presented  for 38 municipal plants.
       Oil and grease removal  varied from a low of  19.2%
       to a high of 99.7% with an average removal  of 78.6%.

F-96   performance  of Two  Municipal Treatment  Plants in
       Texas  in Oil and  Grease Removal;  Hydroscience,  Inc.;
       Westwood, New Jersey.
                             7-117

-------
            Data for June 1973 (Austin plant) show an aver-
       age oil and grease removal of 72.5% and a range of
       32 to 95% removal; for July 1973 (Austin plant) the
       data shows an average oil and grease removal of 96.8%
       with a range of 88 to 100% removal.  Influent and
       effluent sampling data of BOD and ether solubles is
       provided for the Fort worth plant from 1973 to 1975.
       The average oil and grease removal was 46.6%.

F-97   Performance of Two Midwest Municipal wastewater
       Treatment Plants in Oil and Grease Removal; Dr. L.
       W. Polkowski; Madison, Wisconsin.

            Influent and effluent sampling data of BOD, SS,
       and hexane extractables is provided for the Jones
       Island Plant in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and another
       unnamed plant.  Oil and grease removal at Jones
       Island ranged from 76.1 to 99.5% with an average
       removal of 85.9%.  Oil and grease removal for the
       unnamed plant varied from 86 to 92% with an average
       removal of 89%.  A comparison of measurements by the
       alumina column and thin layer chromotography methods
       is also provided.

F-98   Comments on Hexane Extractable Materials and Problems
       at Municipal Treatment Plants; W. Wesley Eckenfelder,
       Jr.; Vanderbilt University; Nashville, Tennessee.

            The report discusses the biodegradability of
       organic compounds and in particular, hexane extractable
       materials in wastewaters containing vegetable and
       animal fats and oils.

F-99   Oxidation of Biodegradable Oil and Grease as Measured
       in BOD tests; James C. Young; Iowa State University;
       Ames, Iowa.

            A study to investigate the ef:-'^ct of oil and
       grease on BOD test measurements and the impact of
       such measurements on setting standards for oil and
       grease discharged by industry to municipal sewerage
       systems and by treatment plants to streams is pre-
       sented.
                            7-118

-------
F-100   (See E-130)
            Hexane extractable removal information for six
       plants  of  the Metropolitan Sanitary District of
       Greater Chicago are presented.  The removal data
       varies  from 26 to 64% with an average oil and grease
       removal of 48.8%.  Also included is a series of pilot
       studies on various industrial wastes to determine
       oil  and grease removals.


       For  additional information pertaining to this section,
       please  refer to the following articles:

       A-l                     E-4              E-58
       A-2                     E-6              E-69
       A-3                     E-ll             E-73
       A-4                     E-12             E-82
       A-6                     E-14             E-85
       A-12                    E-17             E-97
       A-23                    E-24             E-121
       A-31                    E-25             E-125
       A-32                    E-31             E-127
       B-14                    E-49
       B-22                    E-51
       « U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1977—778-502/120 REGION NO. 8
                             7-119

-------