TERRESTRIAL
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY
           PROGRAM

-------
                TERRESTRIAL

  MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

               BRIEFING BOOK
                 MARCH 1986
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
          Toxics/Pesticides Branch
          Corvallis, Oregon 97333

-------
                          Table of Contents


                                                                   Page

Microbial Ecology at CERL                                             1

Laboratory Physical Components                                        2

Recent Accomplishments of the Program                                 3

Research Activities

  -  Inhouse                                                          4
     Extramural                                                      10

Personnel

  -  EPA                                                             20
  -  Visiting                                                        36

Appendix                                                             40

1.  Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens
    on Predatory Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidal).

2.  Draft - Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial
    Pathogens on the Common Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea
    (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

3.  Draft-Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial
    Pathogens on Predatory Hemipterans (Hemiptera: Lygacidae).

4.  Progress Report - Methods for Assessing Fate of Genetically
    Engineered Microorganisms in Soil (8/1/85 - 1/31/86).
    Investigators:  J. M. Tiedje and B. H. Chelm, Michigan State
    University.

5.  Progress Report - Transformation Studies:  Fate and Effects of
    Genetically-Engineered Microbes in Terrestrial Environments.
    Investigator:  G. Stozky, New York University, NYC

6.  Draft - Interim Protocol for Oral Exposure of Avian Species to
    Microbial Pest Control Agents

7.  Draft-Interim Protocol for Intraveneous Exposure of Avian
    Species to Microbial Pest Control Agents.

-------
                          Table of Contents


                                                                   Page

Microbial Ecology at CERL

Laboratory Physical Components

Recent Accomplishments of the Program

Research Activities

  -  Inhouse
  -  Extramural

Personnel

  -  EPA
  -  Visiting

Appendix

1.  Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens
    on Predatory Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidal).

2.  Draft - Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial
    Pathogens on the Common Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea
    (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

3.  Draft-Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial
    Pathogens on Predatory Hemipterans (Hemiptera: Lygacidae).

4.  Progress Report - Methods for Assessing Fate of Genetically
    Engineered Microorganisms in Soil (8/1/85 - 1/31/86).
    Investigators:  J. M. Tiedje and B. H. Chelm, Michigan State
    University.

5.  Progress Report - Transformation Studies:  Fate and Effects of
    Genetically-Engineered Microbes in Terrestrial Environments.
    Investigator:  G. Stozky, New York University, NYC

6.  Draft - Interim Protocol for Oral Exposure of Avian Species to
    Microbial Pest Control Agents

7.  Draft-Interim Protocol for Intraveneous Exposure of Avian
    Species to Microbial Pest Control Agents.

-------
8.  Report - Assessment of Methods for the Detection, Identification,
    and Enumeration of Genetically-Engineered Bacteria in Soil (2/86).

9.  Draft Report - Conjugal DNA Transfer Among Bacteria: Techniques,
    Issues, and Funding Relevant to the Release of Genetically Engineered
    Bacteria.

-------
                       MICROBIAL ECOLOGY AT CERL

Overall Mission

The Microbial Ecology/Biotechnology Team is responsible for developing
test methods based on research and databases concerning the potential
risks of microbial pest control agents and genetically-engineered
microorganisms on terrestrial ecosystems and effects of hazardous
pollutants on microbial processes, activities, and interactions with
other living components.

The activities include:

A.  The development of methodologies to assess environmental risks from
    genetically-engineered microorganisms (OTS,OPP).

B.  The development of scientific protocols for testing the effect of
    biological control agents to non-target organisms (OPP).

C.  The development of environmental risk models to estimate and predict
    the impact of xenobiotic chemicals to microbial populations involved
    in nutrient transformations important to plants (OTS, OPP).

-------
                    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY






Laboratory Physical Components




1.  Main Laboratory




    a.  Three P2 biotechnology laboratories




    b.  Soils microbiology/microbial ecology laboratory.




    c.  Enzymology/analytical biochemistry laboratory




    d.  Virus laboratory for biological control agent research.




    e.  Insectory




2.  Microcosm Containment facility




3.  Avian Test facility




4.  Greenhouse/plant toxicology laboratory




5.  Soils preparation laboratory




6.  Tissue culture containment facility

-------
                      Recent Accomplishments of the Program
 I.  Biotechnology

     Aided in the preparation of the report:

     1.   Aided in the preparation of the report: Research Needs in Biotech-
         nology the and Environment, 1985, Office of Public Sector Programs,
         American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC

     2.   Gave presentations on EPA's coordinated biotechnology plan for
         Congress, OPTS and ORD.

     3.   Evaluated four methods of measuring DNA transfer between candidate
         GEMs for use in the terrestrial environment.

     4.   Demonstrated applicability of "simple" and "complex" microcosms
         for simulating environmental conditions for detecting and
         measuring DNA transfer events.

     5.   Invited to Fourth International Conference on Safety Evaluation
         and Regulation; Safety Evaluation in Biotechnology.

     6.   Establishment of FY 85 extramural program to support the first
         projects dealing directly with established agency risk assessment
         needs in terrestrial biotechnology (Michigan State; New York
         University).

     7.   Sponsored summer workshop to develop program plans for FY 86
         extramural biotechnology research program in both terrestrial
         and aquatic areas.

II.  Biological Control Agents

     1.   Developed interim protocols for biological control agents

         a.  Predatory mites—reviews completed
         b.  Predatory Chrysopidae (lacewing) — in review
         c.  Predatory Lygaeidae—in review
         d.  Predatory Hymenopterans—in preparation
         e.  Predatory Coleoptera—in preparation

     2.   Developed quantitative MPCA inoculation/artifical diets to
         culture nontarget beneficial arthropods.

     3.   Completed construction of working instrumentation for Electronic
         Bioassay System to evaluate effects of MPCA's on insects.

     4.   Completed initial steps for a computer searchable data base
         on effect of biological agents on arthropods.

-------
      5.  Published manuscript entitled "Effects of MPCAs on Non-Target
          Beneficial Arthropods" by Flexner, Lighthart and Croft; in press:
          Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment

      6.  Completed interim protocols on oral and intraveneous exposure
          of avian species to MPCAs.  Protocol on inhalation is under
          development.

      7.  Established tissue culture facility for propagating baculoviruses.
III.  Microbial Ecology

      1.  Developed new research laboratory for studying the effect of chemicals
          on microbial initiated processes and biodegradation.

      2.  Recruiting technical help for establishing research in studying
          microbial mediated transformations in soil.
                                        4'

-------
         INHOUSE RESEARCH




IN MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY

-------
PROJECT TITLE:
Fate and genetic stability of genetically-engineered
microorganisms in the terrestrial environment.
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:  Ramon Seidler, Mike Walter and Arlene Porteous

INSTITUTION:  Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory

OBJECTIVES:   To develop test methods for studying the genetic stability of
              GEMs, particularly those impacting terrestrial environments.
              In the development of these test methods, a combination of
              laboratory as well as simple and complex microcosms approaches
              are envisioned.

              Further objectives include determining applicability of
              laboratory techniques in quantitatively detecting trans-
              conjugants which may form in microcosms, and ascertaining
              whether indigenous recombinants which received engineered DNA
              can in turn become donors of this engineered DNA to
              indigenous species.  Further subobjectives include determining
              whether a generalized technique can be developed to detect
              transfer of DNA from GEM species into certain components of
              the natural flora.  The stability of engineered DNA within a
              GEM is influenced by a complex array of factors, both
              biological as well as physical/chemical.  A longer term
              objective is to address the effects of GEM DNA stability on
              control of substrate utilization specificity and gene
              expression within transconjugants.
OUTPUTS:  Special Report:  Conjugal DNA transfer among bacteria:
          issues, and findings relevant to the release of GEMs.
                                                  techniques,
          Special Report:  A data base for detecting, identifying, and
          enumerating GEMs released into terrestrial environments.

          Journal Article:  An evaluation of four techniques for the
          detection and enumeration of transconjugants in laboratory
          media.

-------
PROJECT TITLE:
Survival and fate of genetically-engineered microorganisms
in the insect-plant ecosystem.
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:  John Armstrong, Guy Knudsen

INSTITUTION:  Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory

OBJECTIVES:  The primary objective of this research is to study the survival,
             fate, and genetic stability of engineered microbes (GEMs) in
             insects feeding on plants that have been sprayed with GEMs.
             The objective includes the development of test methods to
             evaluate factors important in the survival and fate of
             specific groups of GEM species appropriate to those that
             industry is developing for release into the plant/terrestrial
             ecosystem.  Understanding the role of the insect gut and how
             that ecosystem affects the survival, genetic stability and
             fate of GEMs are significant subobjectives.  The role of the
             plant system and the physical/chemical environs (daylight
             hrs, humidity, temperature) are fundamental parameters which
             can impact GEM survival and thus genetic stability.

OUTPUTS:  Journal Article:  Fate and survival of recombinant bacteria and
          recombinant DNA in insects.

          Journal Article:  Regrowth of recombinant bacteria and
          persistence of DNA in insect frass.

          Test methods for studying the fate and genetic stability of
          GEMs in the insect/plant ecosystem.

-------
PROJECT TITLE:  Microbial Ecology/Risk Assessment

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Charles Hendricks

OBJECTIVE:  .Prepare necessary planning documentation to develop a
            terrestrial microbial ecology program on risk assessment.
            This is to include appropriate material on the in situ
            treatment of hazardous wastes.

INSTITUTION:  Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:  Toward the goal of establishing a new laboratory
                  in terrestrial microbial ecology, the following has
                  been accomplished.

                  1.  Completed nine month sabbatical leave at the
                      Department of Plant & Soil Biology, University
                      of California, Berkeley

                  2.  Completed transfer to CERL

                  3.  Draft manuscript - Growth

                  Measurements of Terrestrial Microbial

                  Species by a Continuous-Flow Technique

-------
PROJECT TITLE:  Effects of Microbial Pesticides on Non-Target, Beneficial
                Arthropods

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:  Bruce Lighthart and Brian Croft

INSTITUTION:  CERL, OSU

OBJECTIVES:  To develop tests to evaluate the effects of microbial pest
             control agents (MPCA) on beneficial arthropods taken from
             five insect and mite orders.

             To use the above information in conjunction with a literature
             data base and expert information in a decision support system
             to help decide the risk(s) inherent in the use of potential
             MPCAs.

OUTPUTS:

1.  Optimized protocols for each of five tested insects.

2.  Journal Articles:  Effects of stress conditions on the infectious
processes of entomopathogenic viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa.

3.  Software:  A user friendly microcomputer program to assist personnel
in evaluating the risk(s) involved with the use of a potential MPCA.

-------
PROJECT TITLE:  Development and Validation of Protocols for Safety
                of Microbial Pest Control Agents to Avian Species

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:  M. D. Knittel and A. Fairbrother

INSTITUTION:  Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory

OBJECTIVES:  The project has two objectives:  (1) Development and
             validation of interim protocols for the intravenous, oral
             and respiratory inoculation of test avian species with
             MPCA; and (2) the development of In Vitro test protocols
             to determine safety of MPCA to avian species.

OUTPUTS:  1.  Interim protocol for the oral evaluation of safety of
              MPCAs to avian species.

          2.  Iterim protocol for the intravenous evaluation of safety
              of MPCAs to avian species.

          3.  Interim protocol for the respiratory evaluation of safety
              of MPCAs to avian species.  Draft ready for review.

          4.  Journal article on In Vitro testing of MPCAs.

-------
EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH

-------
TITLE:  Fate and effects of genetically-engineered microbes in terrestrial
        environments

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:  Guenther Stotzky
INSTITUTION:  New York University
STATE DATE:

OBJECTIVES:
June 1985
RESOURCES:  $228,000
The objectives are to develop test methods and protocols for
evaluating the fate, survival, and genetic stability of GEMs
released to terrestrial ecosystems.  The overall objectives
are being achieved through analyses of growth and survival
of many species of GEMs released into many soil types
collected from around the world.  Broth sterile and natural
soils are used.  Genetic stability involving the transfer
of naked DNA molecules released from GEMs as well as the
role of bacterial viruses in the genetic transfer processes
will also be evaluated.
OUTPUTS:

Journal article on the survival and genetic transfer by GEMs in natural
terrestrial environments.

Journal article on the fate in soil of a recombinant plasmid carrying a
Drosophila gene.

Journal article on the transformation and transduction processes in soils
which influence the genetic stability of GEMs.
                                    11

-------
TITLE:  Methods for assessing fate of genetically engineered microorganisms
        in soil

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:  James Tiedje and Barry Chelm

INSTITUTION:  Michigan State University
AWARD DATE:  July 85
                        RESOURCES:  $135,000
OBJECTIVE:
The primary objective is to establish and verify test methods
which would describe the fate and survival of GEMs in soil
ecosystems.  The subobjectives involve the development of a
method for the quantitative recovery of GEMs from soil
followed by an enmasse extraction of DNA and probing
specific sequences; develop a soil microcosm that minmics
the natural environment in order to soil parameters which
influence survival of GEMs.
OUTPUTS:

Journal article on a method for the recovery of GEMs from soil for DNA
probe analyses of genetically-engineered DNA sequences.

Journal article on the use of a soil column technique for evaluating
chemical factors influencing the fate and survival of genetically-
engineered microbes in soil.
                                    12

-------
TITLE:   Evaluation of terrestrial microcosms for assessing the fate and
         effects of genetically engineered microorganisms on ecological
         processes

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Peter Van Voris

INSTITUTION:  Battelle Memorial Institute Northwest

AWARD DATE:  New Estimated June 1986      RESOURCES:  $196,000

OBJECTIVE:  To evaluate and modify the existing EPA/OTS terrestrial
            microcosm test system and test protocol such that they can
            be used to determine the environmental fate and ecological
            hazards of genetically engineered organisms.  The intact
            soil-core microcosm design closely represents natural
            terrestrial ecosystems and when coupled with appropriate
            test protocols can be used to define and limit risks
            associated with the deliberate release of GEM's.

OUTPUTS:

Validated protocol of a soil core to test the fate and effects of GEMs
on ecological processes.

Journal article on the use of soil cores for studying GEM effects on
plants.

Journal article on test methods for studying the effects of GEMs on
soil/plant nutrient cycles.
                                    13

-------
TITLE:  Effect of Foreign Genes on Virulence of Pathogenic Fungi

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  0. C. Yoder

INSTITUTION:  Cornell University

AWARD DATE:  New  Estimate June 1986      RESOURCES:  $226,931

OBJECTIVES:

Determine the effect of foreign pathogenicity genes on the virulence,
host-specificity, and/or survival of saprophytic and pathogenic
filamentous fungi.

Develop a test method to determine exchange of recominant DNA among
fungi.

Determine the effect of heterologous "neutral" genes on the virulence
of a pathogen carrying this DNA in its genome.

OUTPUTS:

Journal article on the influence of foreign pathogenic genes on the
virulence, host-specificity, and survival of saprophytic fungal species.

Journal article on the effects of foreign "neutral" genes on the
virulence and physiology of pathogenic fungal species.
                                    14

-------
TITLE:  Effects of released recombinant streptomyces on the microbiolgy
        and ecological processes of a soil ecosystem

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Donald Crawford

INSTITUTION:  University of Idaho

AWARD DATE:  New Estimated June 1986      RESOURCES:  $174,130

OBJECTIVE:

To develop protocols for assessing the effects of gram positive bacteria
on ecological processes in the soil.

Determine the effects of genetically altered Streptomyces on native gram
positive organisms in the soil.

Determine whether the Strepytomyces recombinants effect major ecological
processes with an emphasis on elucidating their long-term effects on the
cycling of organic carbon.

OUTPUTS:

Journal article on the persistence and fate of recombinant lignin bio-
degrading Streptomyces released to terrestrial ecosystems.

Test method for evaluating effects of recombinant lignin biodegraders
on the cycling of carbon in terrestrial environments.
                                     15

-------
TITLE:  Effects «f genetically-engineered microbes on ecological
        processes in soil.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Guenther Stotzky

INSTITUTION:  New York University
AWARD DATE:

OBJECTIVES:
New Estimated June 1986
RESOURCES:  $270,775
Develop test methods based upon enzymatic, nutritional,
physiological, functional, and taxonomic criteria for
evaluating the potential effects of GEMs on ecological
processes.  Determine which, if any, enzymatic assays
are sensitive, economical, and convenient for detecting
effects from GEMs; develop a series of physiological
and nutritional tests for indexing microbial species
diversity effects of GEMs; evaluate various broad,
functional kinetic activities such as nitrification,
respiration, dinitrogen fixation, etc., which may be
influenced following the release of GEMs into an
ecosystem.
OUTPUTS:
Journal article on the influence of GEMs released into terrestrial
ecosystems on enzymatic processes in soil.

Journal article on the microbial species diversity index to detect
potential influences of GEMs on terrestrial microflora.

Journal article on series of test to measure the effects of GEMs on
key functional processes occurring in soil.

Special report on an index of appropriate measurements for evaluating
the effects of GEMs on biochemical and taxonomic features of the
terrestrial ecosystem.
                                     16

-------
TITLE:  Impact of energy controlled survival on the stability of plasmid
        DNA in genetically-engineered microorganisms.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Richard Morita

INSTITUTION:  Oregon State University

AWARD DATE:  New  Estimated June 1986
OBJECTIVES:
                              RESOURCES:  $199,917
Determine if energy-controlled survival has an impact on the
maintenance of foreign (engineered) DNA, especially plasmid
DNA, in prokaryotic cells.  Determine whether the loss of
plasmid DNA is a generalized phenomenon common to many
candidate GEM species and whether this loss of plasmid DNA
is related to plasmid in group, size, and metabolic functions
encoded; determine how long a GEM must be starved before loss
of plasmid; determine the relative relationship between the
net available nutritional energy in a given terrestrial
enviroment and the loss of the plasmidS; what relative energy
level is necessary for the maintenance of plasmid DNA
molelcules; is there any relationship between cell deatth
and plasmid loss; ascertain whether there are correlations
between nutrition and physiological conditions and loss of
plasmid DNA.
OUTPUTS:
Journal article on the relationship between the available energy in the
terrestrial environment and the persistence of GEMs.

Journal article on the maintenance of recorabinant DNA in GEMs as a
function of plasmid size, function, and available energy in the
ecosystem.

Journal article on the morphological changes during long-term starvation
survival and the loss of plasmid DNA.
                                    17

-------
TITLE:  Evaluation of novel methods for detection of recombinant DNA
        in the soil environment

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Betty Olson

INSTITUTION:   University of California, Irvine

AWARD DATE:  New Estimate June 1986      RESOURCES:  $198,775

OJECTIVE:  Develop a generalized test method for optimal detection
           enumeration of GEMs in terrestrial ecosystems.  The objective
           will be acieved through an investigation of the efficacy or
           riboprobes, nonradioactive probe analysis, direct detection
           of R-DNA in soil, and a validation of these methods in a
           terrestrial microcosm.

OUTPUTS:

Journal article comparing conventional DNA probes with riboprobes in the
detection of GEMs in terrestrial environments.

Journal article on a novel technique for the direct detection of R-DNA
in soil samples.

Journal article on validation of new methods for detecting GEMs in a
terrestrial ecosystem.
                                     18

-------
TITLE:  Ice nucleation and bioluminescence as sensitive tools for
        detection

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Trevor Suslow

INSTITUTION:  Advanced Genetic Sciences

AWARD DATE:  New Estimate June 1986       RESOURCES:  $165,393

OBJECTIVE:  To determine the feasibility of using the bioluminescent
            (lux) gene and ice nucleation active gene (INA) as markers
            to detect genetically engineered microorganisms in
            terrestrial environments.  The system, if successful, will
            allow us to rapidly, conveniently and sensitively assess
            the fate of GEMs in the environment.

OUTPUTS:

Method to incorporate the Lux and INA genes into GEMs for the purpose
of detection within a controlled environment.

Journal article on the use of lux genes in the detection of GEMs
released to plant roots.

Journal article on the fate of Pseudomonas in a terrestrial microcosm
as measured by lux genes and INA gene expression.
                                    19

-------
TITLE:  Determination of the fate and effects of released recombinantly
        generated microorganisms and their parental strains compared
        with measurements made in contained environments

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:  Steven Lindow

INSTITUTION:  University of California, Berkeley

AWARD DATE:  New Estimated June 1986     RESOURCES:  $196,235

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the fate of introduced microorganisms on treated plants,
soil and other habitats following application of such organisms at
concentrations used in microcosm studies and used in typical release
scenarios in the field.

To determine the effects of variable inoculum concentrations of introduced
microorganisms on population size and changes in associate micro and
macroflora on plants and in the soil.

To measure spacial flux of microorganisms from sites of introduction and
determine if such measurements predict resultant spacial distributions
of organisms on adjacent plants or in habitats.

Compare field behavior of wild-type and in vitro constructed strains
under variable biological and physical environments in the field.

OUTPUTS:

Test method for estimating fate of GEMs released to plant surfaces.

Journal article on observations on the fate and spatial distributions
of GEMs released to plants and soil environments.

Journal article on a comparison of survival, population densities and
fate of GEMs released into microcosms and into the field.
                                    20

-------
EPA SCIENTISTS

-------
                             Ramon J. Seidler
                         Research Mlcrobiologist
                Team Leader Microbial Ecology/Terrestrial
                          Biotechnology Program
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Ph.D. — University of California, Davis
B.S.  — California State University, Northridge
        1968
        1964
Research Microbiologist
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Toxics/Pesticides Branch
1984-Present
                                                                1970-1984
Full, Associate, Assistant Professor
Department of Microbiology
Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon
     Microbial ecology and genetics of pathogens, indicator
     organisms.

Sabbatical Leave                                  1978-1979
University of Maryland
     with R. R. Colwell
     Molecular systematics, ecology marine bacteria
              Postdoctoral Fellow
              National Institute of Health
              Univeristy of Texas
              M. 0. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute
              Houston, Texas
                   New methods for molelcular systematics
American Society for Microbiology
American Academy for Microbiology
Society of Sigma Xi
Phi Kappa Phi
Gamma Sigma Delta
                                                  1968-1970
                                    21

-------
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
               Anne Fair-brother
              Research Biologist

Ph.D. — University of Wisconsin, Veterinary Science   1985

M.S.  — University of Wisconsin, Veterinary Sciences  1982

D.V.M.— University of California, Davis               1980

                                                       1976
              B.S.  — University of California, Davis
                       Wildlife Biology
                                               1986-Present
Research Biologist
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Toxics/Pesticides Branch
     Define endpoints resulting from exposures of nontarget
     avian species to microbial pest control agents;
     develop assays to detect immunological responses of
     wildlife to toxic chemicals.

Graduate Research Assistant                       1980-1985
University of Wisconsin
     Interactions of pathogens, toxicants, and temperature
     and their effects on growth, reproduction, metabolism
     and immune responses to deer mice.

Reserach Assistant                                1976-1980
University of California, Davis
     Ectoparasite reinfestations and annual cycles on
     deer mice.

Laboratory Technician                             1972-1976
University of California, Davis
School of Veterinary Medicine
     Bovine transplacental transmission of IBR & BVD
     viruses; antibiotic transmission in milk; genetics
     of hoof overgrowth in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle.
American Society of Mammalogy
American Veterinary Medical Association
Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
Wildlife Disease Association
                                   22

-------
                           Charles W. Hendricks
                         Research Mlcrobiologist
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
              Ph.D. — Colorado State University, Microbiology
              M.S.  — Colorado State University, Microbiology
              B.S.  — Colorado State University, Bacteriology
1966
1964
1962
              Research Microbiologist                        1985-Present
              Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
                   Effect of xenobiotic chemicals on soil microorganisms.

              Visiting Scientist                                     1985
              Department of Plant and Soil Biology
              University of California, Berkeley
                   Research on mlcrobial growth in soil

              Environmental Scientist                           1980-1985
              Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research
              Washington, D.C.
                   Research planning for toxics and pesticides.

              Microbiologist                                    1974-1980
              Office of Drinking Water/EPA
              Washington, D.C.
                   Sanitary microbiology regulations development.

              Assistant Professor                               1967-1974
              Department of Microbiology
              University of Georgia, Athens
                   Microbial ecology of sanitary microorganisms.

              Microbiologist                                    1966-1967
              NAS-NRC Postdoctoral Fellow
              Ft. Detrick, Maryland
                   Regulatory mechanisms of toxin synthesis by
                   Staphylococcus

PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS  American Society for Microbiology
              American Academy for Microbiology
              Sigma Xi
                                    23

-------
                             Bruce Lighthart
                          Research Microbiology
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Ph.D. — University of Washington, Seattle
M.S.  — San Diego State University
B.S.  — San Diego State University
        1967
        1961
        1959

1978-Present
Research Microbiologist
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Toxics/Pesticides Branch
     Research concerned with pollutant effects on soil
     microbiota; effects of microbiological pesticides on
     non-target, beneficial insects; airborne genetically
     engineered microorganisms.

Director and Assistant Professor                  1969-1973
Institute for Freshwater Studies
Department of Biology
Western Washington State University, Bellingham
     Research on the limnology of Lake Whatcom,
     and survival of airborne bacteria in urban air
     pollutants; and teaching oceanography, microbial
     biology, limnology and biochemistry.
              Assistant Professor of Applied Microbiology
              University of Washington, Seattle
                   Research and teaching of microbiology.
                                                  1967-1969
American Association for the Advancement of Science
 (member-at-large, Pacific Station)
Sigma Xi
American Society for Microbilogy
Society for General Microbiology
American Society for Limnology and Oceanography
Plankton Society of Japan
Water Pollution Control Association
Air Pollution Control Association
Society for Invertebrate Pathology
                                   24

-------
                            John L. Armstrong
                           Molecular Ecologist
EDUCATION     Ph.D. — University of Washington, Microbiology        1968
              B.A.  — University of California, Microbiology        1964

EXPERIENCE    Molecular Ecologist                            1985-Present
              Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
                   Research scientist in Biotechnology Group

              Research Associate                                1983-1985
              Oregon State University
                   With Dr. G. S. Beaudreau; studied molecular biology
                   of bacterial toxins.
              Instructor in Microbiology
              Oregon State University
                   Team-taught one term of introductory microbiology
      1983
              Research Associate                               1980-1983
              Oregon State University
                   With Dr. R. J. Seidler; studied antibiotic resistant
                   bacteria in water.

              Development Disabilities Services Coordinator    1978-1979
              Medford, Oregon
                   Coordinated services for mentally disabled people

              Instructor and Director                          1971-1978
              Clifton, Arizona
                   School and workshop for mentally disabled people.
              Assistant Professor of Biology
              Grinnell College, Iowa

              Lecturer in Biology
              Reed College, Oregon
1969-1971
1968-1969
                                    25

-------
                            Paul T. Rygiewicz
                            Reearch EcologistS
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Ph.D. — University of Washington
         Tree/Plant Physiology

M.S.  — University of California, Berkeley
         Forestry/Forest Products

B.S.  — University of Illinois
         Forestry

Research Ecologist
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Toxics/Pesticides Branch
     Plant and soil microbial ecophysiology
     of xenobiotic chemicals

Assist. Research Soil Microbiologis
Dept. of Plant and Soil Biology
University of California, Berkeley
     Soil microbial ecophysiology in forest
     and oak/grassland and ecosystems

Research Associate
Centre National de Recherches Forestieres
Nancy, France
     Biochemistry of nitrogen assimilation
     in mycorrhizal fungi

Research Associate
College of Forest Resources
University of Washington
     Mineral nutrient uptake of coniferous
     species

Research Assistant
Dept. of Forestry
University of California, Berkeley
     Ecophysiology of xylem formation
        1983
                                                                     1976
                                                                     1974
1985-Present
                                                                1984-1985
                                                                1983-1984
                                                                1979-1983
                                                                1978-1979
                                                                1974-1976
Research Wood Technologist
ITT Rayonier, Inc.
     Wood quality related to pulp and paper quality

American Society of Plant Physiology
Ecological Society of America
Phytochemical Society of America
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Sigma Xi, Xi Sigma Pi, Gamma Sigma Delta
                                    26

-------
                            Martin D. Knittel
                              Microbiologist

EDUCATION     Ph.D. — Oregon State University, Microbiology

               M.S. — Oregon State University
                       Microbiology

               B.S. — Willamette University

EXPERIENCE     Microbiologist
               Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
               Toxics/Pesticides Branch
        1965

        1962


        1955

1980-Present



   1974-1980
               Microbiologist
               Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
               Western Fish Toxicology
                    Research on stress induced disease in salmonid fishes
               Research Microbiologist
               Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
               Waste Treatment Branch
                    Research on coliforms in pulp mill effluents
   1971-1974
               Senior Engineer                                  1969-1971
               Jet Propulsion Laboratory
               Pasadena, California
                    Research on survival of microorganisms in space

               Microbiologist                                   1966-1969
               Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
               Eutrophication Branch
                    Research on development of an algal assay test for
                    eutrophic lakes.

               Senior Bacteriologist                            1965-1966
               Norwich Pharmacal Co.
               Norwich, New York
                    Research on mode of action of nitrofurian compounds
                    on bacteria.
               Research Assistant                               1963-1965
               Department of Microbiology
               Oregon State University
                    Research on generic validness among members of
                    genus streptococcus
               Aquatic Biologist
               Oregon Fish Commission
               Clackamas, Oregon
                    Research on diseases of fish
   1962-1963
                                   27

-------
              Aquatic Biologist                                 1962-1963
              Oregon Fish Commission
              Clackamas, Oregon
                   Research on diseases of fish

              Teaching Assistant                                1959-1961
              Department of Microbiology
              Oregon State University
                   Teaching of laboratory sections of General Microbiology

              Medical Laboratory Technician                     1958-1959
              Doctor's Clinic
              Salem, Oregon
                   Routine midical lab procedures

              Medical Reserach Lab Technician                   1956-1957
              U.S. Army Medical Research Lab
                   Technician support to G.I. physiology research lab

              Bacteriologist                                    1955-1956
              Oregon Department of Agriculture
              Division of FOod and Dairy
              Salem, Oregon
                   Bacterial counts on foods for compliance with state
                   regulations.

PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS  Sigma Xi
              Phi Sigma
              New York Academy of Science
              American Association for Science
              American Society for Microbiology
                                    28

-------
                            L. Arlene Porteous
                     Biological Laboratory Technician
EDUCATION
B.S.  — Seattle Pacific University, Microbiology
1967
EXPERIENCE
PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS
Biological Laboratory Technician                1985-Present
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Toxics/Pesticides Branch
     Research technician testing and evaluating the stability
     of DNA transfer in environmental related samples and
     providing analytical support for biotechnology projects
     in evaluating genetically engineered microorganisms and
     their effect on the environment.

Research Assistant                                 1984-1985
Oregon State University
Animal Science Department
     Research microbiologist testing and evaluating the
     microbial quality and stability of liquefied fish
     protein, a high protein supplement used in animal feed.

Microbiolgist                                      1974-1980
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Los Angeles District Office
     Analytical microbiologist testing and evaluating the
     microbial quality of food, drugs and cosmetics.
     Sampling and testing interstate and import samples for
     the presence of microbiological pathogens and bacterial
     toxins.

Microbiologist                                     1968-1974
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
National Center for Antibiotic Analysis
     Analytical microbiologist testing and determining
     antibiotic potency levels in certifiable human and
     veterinarian drug products.  Evaluating and testing
     methods for determining antibiotic residues in animal
     feeds, tissues, serum and food for human consumption.
American Society for Microbiology
                                   29

-------
                           David W. Schmedding
                            Analytical Chemist
EDUCATION     B.A. — California State University, Chemistry         1969

EXPERIENCE    Analytical Chemist                             1983-Present
              Northrop Services, Inc.
                   Presently involved in analytical methods development
                   and feed preparation and treatment level verification
                   for toxicants used in LC5Q> 1.059, induced tolerance,
                   and reproductive tests both at CERL and WFTS.

              Research Chemist                                  1970-1983
              Department of Agricultural Chemistry
              Oregon State University
                   With a variety of pesticide and industrial chemical
                   research projects.  Areas of research include nuclear
                   magnetic resonance studies on the binding of toxicants
                   to biomembranes, physical property determinations for
                   chemicals of environmental concern, determination of
                   adsorption isotherms for various PCBs and pesticides
                   on sand, soil, and clay surfaces, and correlations of
                   physical properties with bioaccumulation.  Developed
                   a method to measure the evaporative loss rate of
                   aerial agriculture sprays as modified by various
                   adjuvants.  Work with toxicants led to an involvement
                   in a U.S.-USSR joint research project on substituted
                   aniline compounds and their mammalian toxicity as
                   related to physical constants.  A cooperative research
                   project with the University of Miami School of
                   Medicine led to the solution of the delayed neuro-
                   toxicological symptomology and resultant deaths of
                   victims of accidentalD ingestions of high partition
                   coefficient organophosphate insecticides.  The
                   interest in organophosphates led to the development
                   of a Knudsen effusion apparatus for determining vapor
                   pressures of "non-volatile" compounds of interest for
                   use in environmental models on bioaccumulation.

              Research Chemist                                  1969-1970
              Friden Research
                   Where work involved computerized formulation and
                   preselection of fluorescent inks, intrinsic viscosity,
                   UV quenching, and volatility determinations with
                   subsequent plant production and screening.
                                   30

-------
                             Jerome J. Wagner
                       Associate Scientist/Chemist
EDUCATION     B.A. — Linfield College, McMinnville, Oregon          1967

EXPERIENCE    Associate Scientist/Chemist                    1977-Present
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
              (IAG) Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Ames Laboratory (DOE)
              Iowa State University
              Ames, Iowa
                   Responsible for the chemical analyses of major, trace
                   and ultra-trace levels of metals in environmental
                   samples, using Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic
                   Emission Spectroscopy at CERL.

              Research Assistant                                1968-1977
              Oregon State University
              School of Oceanography
              Radioecology Department
                   Responsible for radiochemical analyses using gamma-ray
                   spectroscopy and trace metal analyses using Atomic
                   Absorption Spectrophotometry of ecological samples.
                   Other responsibilities included operation and
                   maintenance of computers and supervising a small
                   chemical analytical laboratory.

              Sanitarian II                                     1967-1968
              Yamhill County Health Department
              McMinnville, Oregon
                   Public health official with duties such as inspecting
                   various public facilities to assure compliance with
                   State of Oregon public health related statues.

PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS  Society for Applied Spectroscopy
                                   31

-------
                                Suean Ott
                            Research Associate
EDUCATION     Corvallis High School                                  1972
              LBCC - Certified Assistant Laboratory Animal Tech.     1973
              LBCC - Certified Laboratory Animal Tech.               1977
EXPERIENCE    Associate Scientist with NSI              June 1982-Present
              (IAG) Corvallis Environmental Research Lab
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
              Ames Laboratory (DOE)
              Iowa State University
              Ames, Iowa
                   Responsible for chemical analyses of major, trace and
                   ultra-trace metals in the environment using Induc-
                   tively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy.

              Assistant Laboratory Tech at OSU       June 1972-March 1982
                                    32

-------
                           Katharine A. Harbour
                              Biological Aid
EDUCATION     B.S.  — Oregon State University, Microbiology     1981-1986

                    — Blue Mountain Community College, Medical  1978-1980

EXPERIENCE    Biological Aid                                  1985-Present
              Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
                   Media preparation, quality assurance tests, bacterial
                   plasmid extractions, bacterial mating experiments and
                   growth curves.
              Columbia Medical Laboratories                      1984-1985
                   Drawing venous blood samples, Hematology and Urinalysis
                   testing, glassware cleaning, receptionist work and
                   miscellaneous paperwork.
              El Centre Community Hospital
                   Phlebotomist/Lab Assistant
              Calexico Hospital
                   Phlebotomist/Lab Assistant

              OSU Microbiology Department
                   Microbiology Lab Assistant

              Hermiston Veterinary Clinic
                   Veterinary Assistant
 1982-1983
 1981
1978-1979
                                    33

-------
                            Valerie J. Prince
                           Laboratory Assistant
EDUCATION     Oregon State University               BS expected June 1986
              Senior in Microbiology

EXPERIENCE    Laboratory Assistant                   January 1986-Present
              Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
                   Prepares and provides media, buffers, and other
                   microbiological materials necessary for experiments
                   performed by the Biotechnolgy Team

PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATES    American Society of Medical Technologists
                                   34

-------
                            Karen J. Armstrong
                            Biological Lab Aid
EDUCATION     B.S. — Oregon State University, Microbiology    March 1986
EXPERIENCE    Biological Lab Aid                         May 1985-Present
              Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
                   (1) Responsible for the preparation of media, buffers,
                   and solutions necessary for environment research;
                   (2) Assist in the evaluation of four common methods
                   to evaluate conjugal DNA transfer utilizing plamids
                   from several incompatability groups with laboratory
                   strains and environmental isolates as recipients.
                                   35

-------
VISITING SCIENTISTS

-------
                            Michael V. Walter
                     Post Doctoral Research Associate
EDUCATION     Ph.D. — University of North Dakota

              M.A.  — St. Cloud State University

              B.A.  — Northland College

EXPERIENCE    Post Doctoral Research Associate
              Corvallis Environental Research Lab
              Toxics/Pesticides Branch
                   Biotechnology Team

              Teaching Assistant
              University of North Dakota

              Teaching Assistant
              St. Cloud State Univ.

              Associate Director of Admissions
              Northland College

PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS  North Dakota Academy of Science
              American Society of Microbiology
        1985

        1982

        1978

1985-Present
   1982-1985


   1980-1982


   1978-1980
                                   37

-------
                              Alan R. Barker
                            Research Associate
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
Ph.D. — University of Utah, Biochemistry
B.S.  — University of Utah, Biology
B.S.  — University of Utah, Chemistry
Research Associate
Oregon State University and
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
     Research scientist investigating the enzymology,
     regulation and genetic stability of 2,4-D
     degradation.
        1982
        1976
        1976

1985-Present
              Research Associate                                1983-1985
              Oregon State University
              Department of Nitrogen Fixation
                   Research scientist involved in characterization of
                   hydgogenase in R. japonicum and E.coli.

              Research Associate                                1982-1983
              Washington State University
              Department of Agronomy and Soils
                   Research scientist responsible for purification and
                   characterization of NADPH-nitrate reductase in barley.

              Graduate Research Assistant                       1977-1982
              University of Utah
              Department of Biology
                   Graduate research in the enzymology and physical
                   properties of nitrogenase in A. vinelandii.
                                    38

-------
                              Guy R. Knudsen
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
Ph.D. — Cornell University, Plant Pathology
M.S.  — Cornell University, Plant Pathology
B.S.  — University of New Hampshire, Forestry
        1984
        1981
        1978

1985-Present
Associate Reserach Scientist (Post-Doc)
New York University and
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Toxics/Pesticides Branch
     Biotechnology Group:  Fate and Genetic Stability of
     Recombinant Bacteria

Research Associate                                1983-1985
USDA-ARS Tobacco Research Lab
Oxford, NC
     Biocontrol and computer simulation modeling of foliar
     diseases of peanuts and tobacco.
              Research Associate
              Department of Plant Pathology
              North Carolina State University

PROFESSIONAL
AFFILIATIONS  American Phytopathological Society
                                                  1983-1985
                                   39

-------
APPENDIX

-------
                                                                   28 January 1986
        Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial  Pathogens
                  on Predatory Mites (Acarina:  Phytoseiidae)*

                                  INTRODUCTION
     Registration of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MPCAs)  under Section  Three
of the Fungicide Insecticide Rodenticide Act requires that  the susceptibility
of nontarget species be tested.  Among nontarget species important  in  diverse
agricultural crop systems are predatory mites in the family Phytoseiidae.
These mites are important predators of spider mites (Acarina:  Tetranychidae).
While the family Phytoseiidae is estimated to include ca. 1000 species, there
are 3 species that are most common and representative of biological  control
agents used in agricultural cropping systems in the U.S.:   Amblyseius  fallacis
(Garman), Metaseiulus occidental is (Nesbitt), and Phytoseiulus persimilis
Athias-Henriot.
     This document will outline proposed methods of evaluating the  effects  of
MPCA's on predators.  These methods will have to be adapted to specific
microbial agents, depending on the mode of action of the MPCA.  In  addition,
caution should be exercised in interpreting the results of  such tests  in
predicting the effects of the MPCAs under field conditions. Precise correla-
tion in dosage relationships between laboratory and field effects are  rare.
Laboratory data are usually obtained under optimal conditions  so that  complete
* Disclaimer:  This interim protocol was developed on the basis of current
knowledge of testing the toxicity of chemical  pesticides to the Phytoseiidae.
Modifications may be required as experience in testing microbial pest control
agents is acquired.
                                       1

-------
coverage is attained, prey are provided as needed, and other environmental
impacts such as UV irradiation and rain are excluded.   Thus, laboratory data
may overestimate or underestimate pathogenicity.  Impacts under field condi-
tions are easiest to predict in the extremes, i.e., if the MPCA is highly
pathogenic or nearly nonpathogenic in the laboratory at the proposed field
rates.
     MPCAs are likely to be directed against both insect and spider mite pests.
MPCAs could, therefore, have both direct and indirect  effects on predatory
mites.  Direct effects occur by contact, ingestion, or through systemic effects
from feeding on infected prey (spider mites).  Indirect mortality can occur in
the MPCA is more pathogenic to the spider mite prey than to the predators since
these three speices are obligatory predators.  Lack of prey results in preda-
tory death or dispersal from the site.  Thus, classical serial dilutions of the
pathogen to produce LCso determinations with the predatory mite(s) may not  be
particularly useful if the pathogenic effects is due to indirect mortality.
     Mites in the family Phytoseiidae are primarily predaceous in habit,
although some species will feed and reproduce on pollen.  Sometimes predators
probe leaf tissue for moisture but none is known to reproduce or develop on
plant tissue.  Ingestion of prey involves preoral digestion and sucking the
liquid foods into the predator's digestive tract.  Phytoseiids lack eyes, and,
as chelicerate arthropods, have chelicerae and palps for mouthparts.  Their
fundamental body organization includes the gnathosoma (the mouth-bearing
portion of the body) and the idiosoma.  Phytoseiids have 4 pair of legs as
nymphs and adults, but only 3 pair as larvae.  The life cycle is:  egg, larva,
protonymph, deutonymph, and adult.  At 25°C it takes about one week to complete
the life cycle.  Phytoseiids are dimorphic, with males about 2/3 the size of
females.  The sex ratio is commonly about 2.5 females to 1 male, but may vary.
                                       2

-------
Mating is required before egg deposition occurs.  Pregnant (gravid)  adult
females are commonly used for testing; when well fed,  females deposit  approxi-
mately 2 eggs per day.  Eggs are oval and hatch within 3-4 days at 25°C.
Larvae (with 3 pair of legs) molt to protonymphs within about 24 hours.
     The three recommended phytoseiid species feed on a variety of spider  mite
species, but all do well on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae
Koch.  All stages (eggs, larvae, nymphs and adults) of T. urticae are consumed
by the active stages of these phytoseiids.  Good color photographs of M_.
occidental is females and eggs, as well as of spider mites, are presented  in:
"Grape Pest Management," Publ. 4105, Division of Agricultural Sciences,
University of California, Berkeley, California 94720,  312 pp., 1981.
     All three phytoseiid species have strains which have acquired resistance
to various insecticides and fungicides.  No acquired resistance to MPCAs  is
known in the family, although a rickettsial-like disease and two viruses have
been found in M_. occidental is.  The fungal pathogen Hirsutella thompsom'i  is
pathogenic to spider mites, and to the citrus rust mite (a mite of the family
Enophyidae).  It is reported to be pathogenic to predatory mites in  the field,
although no laboratory assays have been conducted to confirm this.  So,  it is
possible that certain MPCAs will be directly pathogenic to M_. occidental is and
to other phytoseiids.                                 v

                                TEST PROCEDURES
A.   Summary of Tests:
     The tests are designed to determine if direct or indirect mortality
results from exposure to MPCAs.  Test 1 assays direct pathogenic effects on
adult female predators and impact on their fecundity.  Test 2 assays survival
of immature predatory mites, another test of direct mortality.  Test 3 assays
                                       3

-------
the effects on spider mite prey, and this test is most important  if  the MPCA
appears nonpathogenic to the predators it assays for indirect  pathogenicity in
Test 1 and 2.  The test species recommended is either Metaseiulus occidental is
or Amblyseius fallacis.  These two species are preferred  because  they  are key
predators in diverse agricultural corps, and because they are  commercially
available.  £. persimilis is commercially available but very difficult to
contain in test arenas (unless caged) because of its high rate of activity.  If
one species is to be tested, M_. occidental is is recommended because  it is
readily available, has a wide crop range, and is easy to rear  and test.  There
is no reason at this time to believe that different species of phytoseiids
differ in their suscpetibility to MPCAs, but comparative tests have  not  been
done.  [M_. occidental is (and their prey, T. urticae) can  be obtained from
commercial sources such as Integrated Orchard Management, 3524 West  Fairview
Avenue, Visalia, California 93277 (209)625-5199; and Biotactics,  Inc., 7765
Lakeside Drive, Riverside, California 92509 (714)685-7681.]
     Test 1:  Gravid females of M_. occidentalis are placed on  untreated  bean
leaf discs provided with the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) as
prey.  The MPCA is applied and mortality of the predator is assessed after 48
hrs.  If no mortality occurs, monitoring should continue up to 7  days  post
treatment.  The number of eggs produced by M_. occidentalis is  counted  after 48
and 120 hrs.  Eggs should be smashed or removed during counts.  Initial  doses
used should utilize the formulated MPCA at the proposed field  rate,  10X  and
1/10X the proposed field rate, as well as a water control.  If mortality to
adult females occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the  MPCA is  made and
a full dose response can be established (see Methods for details).
     Test 2;  The second test involves placing gravid M_.  occidentalis  females
on bean leaf discs provided with all stages of the two-spotted spider  mite as
                                       4

-------
prey, removing the predator females after 24 hr, treating the leaf discs (and
predator eggs) with the MPCA and observing whether the predator eggs deposited
hatch and develop successfully to the adult stage.  (Eggs hatch at 25°C within
48-72 hrs after deposition.  Adults should be present within 7 days.)
     Test 3;  Indirect toxicity is assessed by recording the effect of the MPCA
at the field rate, 1/10X, and 10X the field rate on all stages of the two-
spotted spider mite prey.  Since phytoseiids require prey to survive and
reproduce, high toxicity to the prey can result in starvation of the predator
or lead to dispersal out of the area in search of food.

B.   Test Species:
     Either M_. occidental is or £. fallacis are suitable for testing.  Both have
been used for testing toxicity of chemicals and therefore an extensive knowl-
edge of laboratory rearing is available.
     MPCAs obtained from the manufacturer should be tested in the formulation
expected to be used under commercial conditions.  Doses should be made up fresh
the day of the tests using distilled water.
     Ideally, an inhouse colony of M_. occidental is or A. fallacis will be
established for use in MPCA testing.  To maintain predator colonies, prey must
also be maintained, preferably the two-spotted spider mite, J. urticae.  Stock
colonies of T. urticae should be maintained on bean plants grown in vermiculite
or a mixture of soil and vermiculite to which a complete fertilizer is added.
J. urticae should be reared in a different area from where the predators are
reared to avoid contamination, and personnel should not re-enter the area where
T. urticae are reared after handling predators.
     M_. occidental is colonies can be cultured on paraffin-coated black paper
discs placed on water-soaked cotton.  Small tufts of cotton provide a site for
                                       5

-------
egg deposition by females.  J. urticae can be added as needed  by  brushing
spider mites from the foliage of the bean plants,  using either a  mite brushing
machine (available from Leedom Engineering, Route 1, Box 325,  Twain  Harte,
California 95383) or by brushing individual leaves with a soft camel's hair
paint brush 1-3 inches wide.
     M_. occidental is females used for a test should be the same age,  randomly
selected and placed on the test bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaf discs.
Numbers tested for each test dose should consist of a minimum  of  40,  but 100 is
necessary if there is substantial variability.   Usually, 5 or  10  females are
placed on a single bean leaf disc.

C.   Test Conditions:
     Bean leaf discs should be cut from healthy, green foliage using a cork
borer, sized 12 to 15.  The leaf disc should be placed, bottom side  up, on a
petri dish or plastic sandwich box filled with absorbent cotton soaked with
distilled water.  Leaf discs should be held at 25°C at 50-75%  R.H. under a long
daylength (16-18 hrs light).  JT. urticae should be provided for predators  in .
tests 1 and 2 by using leaves already infested to make leaf discs.   Test 3
involves treating bean leaf discs infested with all stages of  T.  urticae;  no
predators are added.

D.   Number of Predators in Treatment Groups:
     The number of test predators per treatment rate should be no less than 40
and preferably 100, with the same number in each control group.  Usually,  5 or
10 females are placed on each leaf disc for tests 1 and 2.  After females  have
been removed from discs in test 2, the number of predator eggs present should
be counted and the location of each egg marked by placing a dot of India ink
                                       6

-------
near it to identify the location so that eggs  that  fail  to  hatch can be  iden-
tified.  A total of 40-100 eggs per test dose  should  be  evaluated.

E.   Preparation and Quantification of Test Materials:
     The MPCA should be prepared using the manufacturer's directions.  Ini-
tially, rates tested should include the field  rate, 1/10 the  field  rate, and 10
times the field rate.  If mortality is observed at  these rates  in test 1 or 2
then a dose response should be conducted using at least  4 treatment rates and a
water control.  If no mortality is observed in tests  1,  2,  or 3 at  the initial
rates, the value of a dose response is dubious and  need  not be  performed.

F.   Application Methods;
     Phytoseiid mites and spider mites have been tested  using a variety  of
application methods including slide dip, leaf  spray,  and leaf dip.   In some
tests predatory mites are placed on the dried  residues;  in  other cases they are
sprayed using a Potter spray tower (available  from  Burkhard Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd., Woodcock Hill, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire,  WD3 1P5, England) or  other
spray device.  In general, application of the  spray to the  predators after
being placed on bean leaf discs with their prey provides the  most useful
information as 1t approximates the field condition.   If  a Potter spray tower is
not available to apply the MPCA, an inexpensive alternative Involves the use of
a propellent spray apparatus such as Crown* Spray-tool power  pak (Crown  Indus-
trial Products Co., Hebron, Illinois 60034), which  contains a chlorofluoro-
carbon under pressure (62 Ibs at 70°F).  Separate plastic tubes and bottles
should be kept for each MPCA used to reduce the likelihood  of contamination of
the holding container with previously-used MPCA.  The leaf  discs should  be
sprayed to drip.  Place the discs in a vertical position, hold  the  spray power

-------
pak about 12 inches away from the leaf discs and spray for approximately  5
seconds to obtain a complete coverage.  When performing any of  the  microbial
procedures used in this protocol, it is redommended that the Class  II  contain-
ment procedures be followed as specified in "Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories" (Eds. J. H. Birchardson and W. Emmett  Berkley, 1984,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control,
Atlanta, Georgia).

G.   Post Treatment Observations:
     Test 1;  Adult predator females should be evaluated after  48 hrs  for
mortality; numbers of eggs deposited by the females should be determined  by
counts under a dissecting microscope after 48 and 120 hrs.  Eggs should be
removed so the next count records new eggs deposited.  The number of females
that are absent or have run off the disc should be recorded, but these data
typically are included as "dead" when determining dose response data.  Death is
assumed if the female is unable to move when gently touched with a  fine brush.
     In some cases, mortality can't be determined within 48 hrs and observa-
tions should be continued every 24 hrs up to 7 days subsequent  to the  test.
After 7 days, the quality of the bean leaf discs is poor, and reliable data are
not obtained.
     Test 2:  Tests involving predator eggs (deposited by gravid females  within
a 24-hr period) should be monitored 72 hrs after treatment to determine the
number of eggs that have hatched and the number of larvae that  are  dead,  alive,
absent, or off the disc.  Such counts should be repeated until  it is clear from
the control discs that no more eggs will hatch.  Then, the discs should be held
until the larvae have reached adulthood on the control discs.  Determine  the
number of adult males and females present on each disc.  If the MPCA has
                                       8

-------
affected devlopmental rate, this may be measured by comparing the number  of
adults on control discs with the number present on treated  discs.   Predators
should become adults within 7 days at 25°C.
     General:  Leaf discs containing both adult and immature predators  should
be checked daily to be sure sufficient ]_. urticae prey are  available.   Preda-
tors will die or run off the discs if prey becomes scarce.   Additional  prey can
be added to the discs as needed by brushing on small quantities.
     Test 3:  Check the discs with ]_. urticae every 48 hrs  for one week;
determine whether all stages are alive and whether new eggs have  been depos-
ited.  Continue observations for 7 days; the quality of the leaf  tissue will
deteriorate after that so that spider mites may disperse or die due to  poor
leaf quality.

H.   Reporting:
     Test data should be recorded as described above.  Also included should be
notes on behavioral changes observed, such as a tendency for treated predators
to be excessively active.  Data submitted should include the following:
1.   Name of the test, sponsor, test laboratory, study director,  principal
     investigator and dates of testing.
2.   A detailed description of the test MPCA, including the formulation and
     concentration.  Include the type of dilutions carried  out.
3.   Detailed information about species of predators used in the  test,  their
     scientific name, source (supplier or inhouse colony),  and history  of any
     indigenous disease, if known.  Age of test subjects, test conditions
     (temperature, lighting level and duration, and relative humidity)  should
     be included.

-------
4.   Describe the test substrates, dimensions,  number of test predators  per
     leaf disc, and number of replicates per dilution of MPCA.
5.   The percentage of test subjects dead at each dose after each observation
     period should be reported.
6.   If a dose response test is conducted, the  statistical  test used  should  be
     reported (logit or probit).   Minimal data  reported would include 1059 and
     LCgo with their confidence intervals, the  slope (and confidence  interval)
     and intercept.
7.   Any deviation from this test protocol should be reported,  as well as
     anything unusual about the test such as temperature fluctuations, disease
     problems in the control predators, etc.
                                       10

-------
                               USEFUL REFERENCES
Phytoseiid Biology and Ecology
Hoy, M. A., Ed.  1982.  Recent Advances in Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae, Div.
     Agric. Sciences, University of California,  Berkeley,  Publ.  3287, 92 pp.
McMurtry, J. A., C. B. Huffaker, and M. van de Vrie.  1970.  Ecology of
     tetranychid mites and their natural  enemies:   A review.   I.  Tetryanychid
     enemies:  their biological characters and the impact  of spray  practices.
     Hilgardia 40(11):331-390.
Krantz, G. W.  1978.  A Manual of Acarology, second edition,  Oregon State
     University Book Stores, Corvallis.

Microorganisms Associated with the Phytoseiidae
Hess, R. T., and M. A. Hoy.  1982.  Microorganisms associated with  the spider
     mite predator Metaseiulus (=Typhlodromus) occidental is;   Electron micro-
     scope observations.  J. Invert. Pathol. 40:98-106.
Sutakova, G., and F. Ruttgen.  1978.  Rickettsiella phytoseiuli  and virus like
     particles in Phytoseiulus persimilis (Gamasoidea:  Phytoseiidae) mites.
     Acta Virol. 22:333-336.

Microorganisms Associated with Mites in General
Surges, H. D., and N. W. Hussey, Eds.  1971.  Microbial Control  of  Insects and
     Mites, Academic Press, London.
                                       11

-------
Krieg, A.  1968.  Effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis  exotoxin  on
     Tetranychus telarious (Acarina:  Tetranychidae).   J.  Invert.  Pathol.
     12:478-480.
Reed, D. K.  1981.  Control of mites  by non-occluded  viruses,   pp.  472-431.
     In:  Surges, H. D.  Microbial Control  of Pest  and Plant Diseases  1970-
     1980, Academic Press, NY.
Steinhaus, E. A.  1949.  Principles of Insect Pathology.   McGraw  Hill,  New
     York, 757 pp.
                                       12

-------
                                                               7 February 1986
        Interim Protocol  for Testing the Effects  of Microbial  Pathogens
          on the Common Green Lacewing,  Chrysoperla carnea  (Stephens)
                           (Neuroptera:  Chrysopidae)1

                                  Introduction
     Registration of Microbial Pest Control  Agents (MPCAs)  under Subsection M
of the Fungicide, Insecticide, and Rodenticide Act as  amended  (PL 92-516,
94-140, 95-396; Sept. 30, 1978) requires that the susceptibility of  nontarget
species be tested.  Among nontarget insect species beneficial  in field and
orchard crop systems are predatory Neuroptera.  Because of  its worldwide
distribution, high densities in orchards and field crops, wide prey  range, and
availability from commercial sources, the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla
carnea (Stephens) is an important species for laboratory study.
     This document outlines proposed methods of testing the susceptibility of
this predator to MPCAs.  Because the lacewing 1s a nontarget organism, it is
not likely to be killed by the MPCA, and so a classic  serial dilution  of the
pathogen is not likely to produce a classic LDso, LDgn,, and straight slope of
mortality.  Instead, the researcher simply may have to show that a range of
concentrations approximating field rates does not significantly alter  the -
survival, reproduction, and predatory capabilities of  the lacewing.
1 Disclaimer:  This interim protocol was developed on the basis of current
knowledge of testing the toxicity of chemical pesticides to the Phytoseiidae.
Modifications may be required as experience in testing microblal  pest  control
agents is acquired.

-------
     These methods will have to be adapted to specific  mlcrobial agents,
depending upon the MPCA mode of action.   Interpretations  of  such test results
in predicting the effects of the MPCAs under field conditions  require caution.
Precise correlations in dosage relationships between  laboratory and field
pathogenicity are rare.  Laboratory data are usually  obtained  under optimal
conditions:  complete coverage is attained, prey are  provided  as needed, and
other environmental impacts such as UV irradiation and  rain  are excluded.
Thus, laboratory data usually overestimate pathogenicity.  Impacts under field
conditions are easiest to predict in the extremes, i.e.,  if  the MPCA is highly
pathogenic or mildly pathogenic in the laboratory at  the  proposed field rates.
     MPCAs are not likely to be directed against the  common  green lacewing
since its prey are found in completely different taxonomic groups.  The lace-
wing is in the order Neuroptera, while its prey includes  mites (Acarina),
aphids, whitefly, and psyllids (Homoptera), and eggs  and  small caterpillar
larvae (Lepidoptera).
     Since lacewing eggs and pupae are not readily penetrated  by chemicals,
they are rarely affected by chemical pesticides (reviewed by Bigler, 1984;
Grafton-Cardwell and Hoy, 1985).  Thus, eggs and pupae  are not likely to be
significant targets of MPCAs.  The adult £. carnea are  nectar  feeders, non-
predacious, and disperse widely.  Since they do not stay  in  one place, contact
infection is probably minimal; the greatest infective potential would occur
with MPCA ingestion during feeding on plant nectar.  The  primary stage affected
both by contact and oral infection would be the predacious £.  carnea larvae,
which would be resting on and searching treated plant tissue and feeding on
infected prey.  Ingestion of prey involves piercing the integument of the prey
and sucking liquid foods.  Larvae may also occasionally feed on nectar and
water.  Additional pathogenic effects for the larval  stage are those which are
                                       2

-------
sublethal or more long-term and result in decreased predation  rates  as  larvae,
slower development, Incomplete pupation,  unsuccessful  emergence  as adults, and
lowered fecundity and fertility.
     Various life stages of £. carnea have been tested with several  MPCAs to
detect the adverse effects of immediate contact exposure as well  as  those of
long-term exposure.  Suter (1978) and Franz et^ al_.  (1980) treated a  glass plate
with a suspension of Bacillus thuringiensis and examined feeding rates  of the
larvae and fertility of adults resulting from larvae reared on this  plate.  IJ.
thuringiensis had little or no effect on either of  these parameters. Wilkinson
iet^ al_. (1975) treated filter paper with a suspension of JJ. thuringiensis or NPV
of Heliothis and placed larvae and adults in petri  dish cages  with the  treated
paper.  No significant mortality resulted from this contact exposure.   Since
the target host may have to feed to become infected with viral and bacterial
MPCAs, it is likely that the predator must also ingest the MPCA  to become
infected.  Therefore, simple treatment of the substrate and measurements of
contact mortality such as those done with chemicals (e.g., chlorinated  hydro-
carbons, organophosphorus, and carbamate pesticides) may not be  the  most
realistic tests for these groups of MPCAs.
     Other researchers have attempted to design tests which include  consumption
of the MPCA by the predator larvae.  Hassan and Groner (1977)  produced  a three-
level test in which lacewing larvae were (1) directly sprayed with a suspension
of NPV of Mamestra brassicae, (2) placed on dried residues of the NPV,  and  (3)
fed for 3 days on artificial diet containing the NPV.  The larvae were  then
placed in untreated containers with untreated host and the fecundity of the
adults resulting from the treated larvae, food consumption rate  of the  larvae,
and % egg hatch of the resulting adults were measured.  The NPV  of M.  brassicae
had no significant effect on these parameters.  Salama et _al_. (1982) had a
                                       3

-------
two level test in which lacewing larvae were (1)  fed for 7  days  on  Aphis
durante sprayed with a suspension of 13. thuringiensis.  and  (2) fed  for  7 days
on Spodoptera littoral is (Lepidoptera) fed for 24 hours an  artificial diet
containing B_. thuringiensis.  After 7 days, the larvae  were fed  untreated host;
it was found that their larval duration was significantly longer and consump-
tion rate significantly lower.  Umarov et jil_. (1975) found  no mortality when
larvae were exposed to plants or prey sprayed with jj. thuringiensis.  Wilton
and Klowden (1985) fed solubilized crystals of ti. thuringiensis  to  newly adult
£. carnea and observed no mortality.
     From these experiments using varied methods for detecting  immediate and
long-term toxic effects of MPCAs, five tests were selected  for this protocol.

                                Test Procedures
A.   Summary of Tests:
Test 1 — Adults
     Since £. carnea adults actively move from plant to plant,  they contact
treated surfaces for short periods.  Thus, their dermal exposure is less than
that of larvae.  In addition, adults preen themselves and feed  on plant nectar,
making oral inoculation the most likely route and the most  conservative test
for this stage of C. carnea.  The suggested method for  testing  adults  is
described by Wilton and Klowden (1985).  Newly emerged  £. carnea adults are
held by the wings with forceps and offered 1 microliter of solubilized  MPCA or
heat-inactivated MPCA.  Adults drink readily upon emergence. After the drop is
ingested, the test insects are placed either individually or as  treatment
groups in cages with food and a water source and checked for mortality  after 48
and 72 hours.  If no mortality occurs after 72 hours, observations  should  be
made daily for up to 7 days.  Equal numbers of males and females should be

-------
tested.  Initial doses used should utilize the formulated MPCA at the proposed
field rate, lOx, and l/10x the proposed field rate,  as  well  as a heat-inacti-
vated control.  If mortality to adults occurs at  these  doses, a serial dilution
of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can  be  established.

Test 2 — Adults
     Fungal pathogens may penetrate the adult lacewing  integument and so a
contact toxicity test was designed for this group.
     A 1-ounce cup (or other suitable disposable  container)  is sprayed or
dusted with the MPCA or inactivated MPCA.   Adults are provided food and water
and mortality is assessed after 48 and 72  h.  If  no  mortality occurs after  72
hours, observations should be made daily for 7 days. Equal  numbers of males
and females should be tested.  Initial doses used should utilize the formulated
MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx, and  l/10x the  proposed field  rate, as
well as an inactivated control.  If mortality to  adults occurs at these doses,
a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and  a full  dose response can  be estab-
lished.

Test 1 -- Larvae
     The first test consists of dipping or spraying? the test cage  with a
suspension of the MPCA or heat-inactivated MPCA and  placing  first Instar £.
carnea larvae on the dried residues with untreated prey.  It is  important to
treat every surface that the larvae will contact, since larvae will avoid
resting on repellent chemicals.  After 7 days, the larvae  are moved to
untreated dishes and fed untreated prey until pupation.  Percentage larval
2 Precautions should be taken to avoid breathing the aerosol, I.e., carry  out
  spraying in a Class II containment hood.

-------
mortality, mean larval duration, percentage successful  emergence  of  adults, and
number and percentage hatch of eggs deposited by 20 mated  females for  a 2-week
period (which were exposed to the MPCA as larvae) are measured.   Initial doses
should use the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx, and  l/10x the
proposed field rate, as well as a heat-inactivated control.   If mortality to
larvae occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the  MPCA is made  and a full
dose response can be established.        x

Test 2 — Larvae
     This method is described by Salama et^ al_. (1982).   Two-day-old  C_. carnea
larvae are fed for 7 days on eggs, larvae, or pupae of  the target host which
have been sprayed2 with a suspension of an MPCA or heat-inactivated  MPCA.   If
the target host is not available, the next best hose choice is one in  the same
insect order which is also susceptible to the MPCA (commonly used prey are
neonate larvae of Lepidoptera, lepidopterous eggs, or aphids).  After  7 days,
the larvae are fed untreated prey until pupation.  Percentage larval mortality,
mean larval duration, percentage successful emergence of adults,  and number and
percentage hatch of eggs deposited by 20 mated females  for a 2-week  period
(which were exposed to the MPCA as larvae) are measured.  Initial doses should
use the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx and l/10x the  proposed
field rate, as well as a heat-inactivated control.  If  mortality  to  larvae
occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and  a full dose
response can be established.

Test 3 — Larvae
     The most rigorous test is to assay the effect of £. carnea  larvae feeding
on target hosts which have ingested the MPCA organism.   However,  target hosts
                                       6

-------
may be difficult to obtain, inoculate, rear,  and feed to the lacewing  larvae.
Caution should be used if artificial  diets are used  instead  of  live prey,
because the diets are difficult to produce and will  reduce the  vitality  and
survival of lacewing larvae (Tulisalo in Canard et al.,  1984).   This confuses
insect mortality because of the inadequate larval  nutrition.
     The method chosen for this protocol is described by Salama et^ ^U  (1982).
The £. carnea larvae are fed for 7 days on the target host,  which  has  been fed
for 24 h on an artificial diet containing the MPCA at a  specific concentration.
The control £. carnea receive prey which have been fed artificial  diet contain-
ing the heat-inactivated MPCA.  After 7 days, the lacewing larvae  are  fed until
pupation on untreated diet.  Percentage larval mortality, mean  larval  duration,
percentage successful emergence of adults, and number and percentage hatch of
eggs deposited by 20 mated females for a 2-week period (which were exposed to
the MPCA as larvae) are measured.  This test  requires that an artificial diet
be available for the target host.  Artificial diets  are  not  available  for some
insect groups such as aphids; in this case, the lacewing larvae could  be fed
the MPCA directly in lacewing artificial diet without involvement  of the target
host.  Initial doses should utilize the formulated MPCA at the  proposed  field
rate, lOx and l/10x the proposed field rate, as well as  a heat-inactivated
control.  If mortality to larvae occurs at these doses,  a serial dilution of
the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established.

B.   Test Species:
     The common lacewing, Chyroperla carnea (previously  known as Chrysopa
carnea) is available as eggs from many commercial  biological control suppliers
(e.g., 1. Bioinsect Control, 1710 S. Broadway, Plainview, Texas 79072;
2. Peaceful Valley Farms, 11173 Peaceful Valley Road, Nevada City, California
                                       7

-------
95959; 3. Biogenesis, Inc., Lake Road,  P.O.  Box  36,  Mathis, Texas 78368).3
Ideally, an inhouse colony of lacewings should be maintained so that the diet
and rearing conditions can be kept uniform.   However, £.  carnea have voracious
appetites, are cannibalistic, and so must  be fed every  48 hours.  Thus, great
time and expense may be required to maintain a colony of  lacewings and suffi-
cient live prey to feed them.  If eggs  are obtained  from  commercial sources,
the larvae must be fed as soon as they  hatch and should be used for testing ca.
2 days after hatching.  It is important to test  lacewing  larvae as first
instars because the longer they are reared as a  group,  the higher cannibalism
rate.  Even if cannibalistic attacks are not fatal,  the vigor  of the test
animals is reduced.  Also, when treated as first instar larvae, subsequent
larval, pupal, and adult stages can be  observed  for  sublethal  effects.
     An excellent summary of the techniques  for  rearing lacewings is found in
the Biology of Chrysopidae (Canard et al.  1984).  Eggs  and larvae of the potato
tuberworm, Phthorimaea operculella, and grain moth  eggs such  as Anagasta
kuhnielja (Zeller) or Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) are  commonly used as food
for £. carnea larvae.  The adults rear  extremely well on  a diet of water and a
food source consisting of 1 gram yeast  hydrolysate  (Yeast Products,  Inc.,
Clifton, New Jersey) + 6 grams Formula  57 (Qualcepts Company,  Edina, Minnesota)
+ 10 grams honey + enough water to make a paste.

C.   Test Conditions:
     During testing, both larvae and adults  should  be kept in a growth chamber
(16-hour photoperiod, 50-80% RH, 22-26°C).  Temperature and humidity should be
adjusted within these ranges for optimal effectiveness  of the MPCA.  Adults
3 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.
                                       8

-------
should be provided food (1 g yeast hydrolysate +  6  g  Formula 57 + 10 g honey +
water) and water-soaked cotton.   Adults  can  be grouped in a petri dish half or
other cage setup such as 8 to 16 ounce plastic cartons.  The adult cage should
have a mesh opening for airflow.
     Larvae must be provided prey (grain moth  eggs, aphids, and/or neonate
Lepidoptera larvae) every 48 to 72 hours. A water  source is not needed.
Larvae must be placed individually in cages  such  as 1-ounce plastic cups with
tight-fitting lids (e.g., 1-oz.  Serco Cups,  manufactured by S. E. Rykoff and
Co., California) to prevent escape and cannibalism.  Larvae should be 2 to 4
days old at the start of the test.
     Regular disinfection of cages must  be done;  equipment, instruments, and
supplies must be sterilized and aseptic  techniques  used when indicated.
     Stock colonies must be separated physically  (separate laboratory or build-
ing) from test area, where contact with  MPCAs  could occur.
     As a general rule, if larval or adult control  mortality is greater than
20% or successful pupation is less than  75%, then the colony is diseased or
inappropriately fed, invalidating test results.

D.   Number of Individuals in Treatment  Groups:
     There should be at least 40 adult £. carnea  per  treatment rate, with the
same number in the control group.  Usually 5 individuals are placed in each
test cage and 2 to 3 groups of 15 to 20 adults are  tested on different dates.
For the larval testing, a minimum of 100 larvae should be tested per treatment
rate since larvae are more plentiful than adults  and  since the tests measure
long-term effects.  Usually, 20 to 25 larvae are  tested per treatment and the
tests are replicated 4 times.

-------
E.   Preparation and Quantification of Test  Materials:
     The MPCA should be prepared using the manufacturer's directions.   Ini-
tially, rates tested should include the proposed field  rate,  1/10 the fjeld
rate, and 10 times the field rate.   If significant  mortality  is observed at
these rates, than a dose response should be  conducted using  at  least 4  treat-
ment rates and a water control.  If no mortality is observed  at the initial
dosages, the value of a dose response is dubious and a  dose  response test need
not be performed.
     When performing any of the microbial  procedures used in  this protocol, it
is recommended that the Class II containment procedures be followed as  speci-
fied in Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories  (Birchardson
and Barkley, 1984).

F.   Application Methods:
Test 1 — Adults
     The formulated MPCA is drawn up into a  microliter  pipet  and  the newly-
emerged adult lacewing is held gently by the wings  and  allowed  to feed  on a
1-microliter droplet.

Test 2 — Adults
     The adult cage, which may be a petri  dish or disposable plastic cup with
lid, should be sprayed, dipped, or dusted with the MPCA so that the entire
inside surface is treated.  The cage is air-dried for 1 hour.  One to 5 adult
lacewings and food and water are then placed inside the cage.
                                       10

-------
Test 1 — Larvae
     The larval cage, which may consist  of  a  1-ounce  plastic cup with lid,
should be dipped in or sprayed^ to runoff with  a  suspension of the MPCA so that
all of the inside surface of the cup and lid  is treated.  The cage is drained
and then air-dried for 1 hour.   One lacewing  larva  and untreated prey are then
placed inside the cage.

Test 2 -- Larvae
     The target host or other suitable prey for C_.  carnea are sprayed using a
Potter spray tower (Burkard Manufacturing Company,  Ltd., Woodcock Hill,
Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire WD3, 1P5, England) or  other spray device.  If a
Potter spray tower is not available, an  inexpensive alternative involves the
use of a propellent spray apparatus such as Crown SprayTool Power Pak (Crown
Industrial Products Company, Hebron, Illinois 60034)  which contains a chloro-
fluorocarbon under pressure (62 pounds at 70°F).  Separate plastic tubes and
bottles should be kept for each MPCA concentration  to prevent contamination due
to residues.  The target host should be  sprayed for 1 second from a distance of
8 inches.  All sprays should be conducted in  a  laminar flow hood and the test
personnel should wear gloves, laboratory coats, and masks.  Air exhausted from
the spray areas must not be recirculated.   Appropriate hoods with HEPA filters
must be used.  A minimum class II hood is needed.  Waste MPCAs should be
disposed of properly.  The treated target host  is then fed to 2-day-old lace-
wing larvae.
                                       11

-------
Test 3 -- Larvae
     Specific doses of the formulated MPCA are  incorporated  into target host
artificial diet or lacewing artificial  diet.  The target host or lacewing diet
is then fed to 2- to 4-day-old lacewing larvae.

G.   Post Treatment Observations
Tests 1 and 2 — Adults
     Adult lacewing females and males should  be evaluated  after 48 and 72
hours.  Death is assumed if an individual  is  unable to move  when gently touched
with a brush.  If there is no mortality after 72 hours, observations should be
continued  for 7 days.

Tests 1, 2, and 3 — Larvae
     Lacewing larvae should be evaluated for  mortality after 48 and 72 hours.
Death is assumed if the larva is unable to walk when  gently  touched with a
brush.  Records should be kept of percentage  larval mortality, mean time in
days until pupation, % successful emergence as  adults, and number and percent-
age hatch of eggs deposited by 20 pairs of mated 10-day-old  females.  £. carnea
must mate to produce fertile offspring and do not  reach peak oviposition until
approximately 1 week after emergence.  Therefore,  sexed pairs should be caged
upon emergence and records of number and % hatch of eggs should be initiated 10
days after emergence.  Number and percentage  egg hatch should be measured for 2
week s.

H.   Reporting:
     Test data should be recorded as described  and include:
                                       12

-------
1.   Name of the test, sponsor,  test  laboratory,  study director, principal
     investigator, and dates  of  testing.
2.   A detailed description of the test MPCA,  including the formulation concen-
     tration, and lot number  or  batch number.   Include the type of dilutions
     carried out.
3.   Detailed information about  the source  of  lacewings used, and history of
     indigenous disease, if known.  Age of  test subjects, test conditions
     (temperature, lighting level  and duration, and  relative humidity) should
     be included, as well  as  the exact method  of  dosing.
4.   Describe the test substrates, dimensions, number of test predators per
     cage, and number of replicates per dilution  of  MPCA.
5.   The percentage of test subjects  dead at each dose after each observation
     period should be reported.
6.   For long-term tests of larvae, the mean duration in days of the larval
     period, the percentage successful emergence  of  adults, and the number of
     eggs and the % egg hatch of 20 pairs of adults  should be reported.
7.   If a dose response is conducted, the statistical test used should be
     reported (logit or probit).  Minimal data reported would include the LCso
     and confidence interval, the  slope,  and intercept.
8.   Any deviation from this test  protocol  should be reported, as well as
     anything unusual about the  test  such as temperature fluctuations, disease
     problems in the predators,  etc.
                                       13

-------
                                   REFERENCES
Bigler, F.  1984.  Biological  control  by chrysopids:   integration with pesti-
     cides,  pp. 233-246.  Jj^ Biology  of Chrysopidae,  M.  Canard, Y.  Semeria,
     and T. R. New (eds.), Dr. W. Junk Publishers.   The Hague, The Netherlands.
Birchardson, J. H., and W. Emmett Barkely (eds.).   1984.   Biosafety  in Micro-
     biological and Biomedical Laboratories.   U.S.  Department of Health and
     Human Services, Center for Disease Control,  Atlanta,  Georgia.
Canard, M., Y. Semeria, and T. R. New  (eds.).  1984.   Biology of Chrysopidae.
     Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.   Chapter 8.  Biological
     and integrated control by chrysopids.  8.1 Mass  rearing techniques,  by U.
     Tulisalo, pp. 213-220.
Franz, J. M., H. Bogenschutz, S. A. Hassan, P. Huang,  E.  Nation, H.  Suter, and
     6. Viggiani.  1980.  Results of a joint  pesticide test programme by the
     working group:  pesticides and beneficial arthropods. Entomophaga
     25:231-236.
Grafton-Cardwell, E. E., and M. A. Hoy.  1985.  Intraspecific variability in
     response to pesticides in the common green lacewing,  Chrysoperla carnea
     (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).  Hilgardia 53:1-32.
Hassan, S. A., and A. Groner.  1977.  Die Wirkung von Kernpolydern  (Baculovirus
     Spec.) aus Mamestra brassicae auf Trichogramma cacoeciaeps  (Hymenoptera:
     Trichogrammitadae) und Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera:  Chrysopidae).
     Entomophaga 22:281-288.
                                       14

-------
Salama, H. S., F. N. Zaki, and A.  F.  Sharaby.   1982.   Effect of Bacillus
     thuringiensis Berl. on parasites and  predators of the cotton leafworm
     Spodoptera UttoraTIs (Boisd.).   Z. Angew.  Entomol. 94:498-503.
Suter, H.  1978.  Prufung der Einwirkung von  Pflanzenschutzmltteln auf die
     Nutzarthropoden, Chrysopa carnea Steph.  (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) --
     Methodic und Ergebnisse.  Schweizerische  Landwirtschaftliche Forschung
     17:37-44.
Umarov, S. A., Nilova, G. N., and  I.  D. Davlyatov.  1975.  The effect of
     entobakterin and dendrobacillin  on beneficial arthropods (in Russian).
     Zashch. Rast. 3:25-36.  (English abstract translation in Rev. Appl. Ent.
     A64:6920, 1976).
Wilkinson, J. D., K. D. Biever, and C. M.  Ignoffo.  1975.  Contact toxicity of
     some chemical and biological  pesticides to several insect parasitoids and
     predators.  Entomophaga 20:113-120.
Wilton, B. E., and M. J. Klowden.   1985.   Solubilized  crystal of Bacillus
     thuringiensis subsp. israelensis: effect on  adult house flies, stable
     flies (Diptera: Muscidae), and green  lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).
     J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1:97-98.
                                       15

-------
     Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial  Pathogens
             on Predatory Henri pterans (Henri ptera: Lygaeidae)

                               INTRODUCTION

     Registrations   of   Microbial   Pest   Control   Agents   (MPCAs)   under
subsection  M of  the Fungicide  Insecticide  Rodenticide Act  requires  that
the  susceptibility  of  nontarget  species  be  tested.   Among  nontarget
species  important in  various agroecosystems  are  predatory  true  bugs  in
the  Geocorinae  subfamily  of  the  family  Lygaeidae.  These true bugs  are
Important predators  of  mites  and numerous insect  pest  species,  especially
pests  in   their   egg   or  early  larval  stages.   As  such  geocorines,
especially   members  of  the   genus  Geocoris   are important   agents   of
biological  control  of  pest  insects.   In the  southern and southwestern
agroecosystems of the  U.S., £.  punctipes  1s one  of the most economically
Important members of this genus.
     This   document  will   outline   proposed  methods   of   testing  these
geocorine predators  with  MPCAs.   These methods will have to  be adapted to
specific  microbial  agents,   depending  upon  the  mode   of  action  of  the
MPCA.  Caution  should  be  exercised  in  Interpreting the  results  of  such
tests  In predicting  the  effects of  the  MPCA's  under field  conditions.
Precise  correlation  in  dosage relationships  between laboratory  and  field
tox1c1t1es  are  rare.  Effects of enviornmental factors  in  the  field  are
difficult to duplicate  under  laboratory conditions.   Laboratory data  may
overestimate or underestimate toxicity.
     MPCAs  may  have direct  and  indirect effects  on   predatory  Insects.
They  may be directly  toxic   to predators,  and/or may adversely  affect
predators by reducing  the numbers  of  their  food supply.   They may  even

-------
have  a temporarily beneficial  effect upon the  predators by weakening  or
killing  prey,  making  these  prey  more  susceptible to  predator attack  or
scavenging.   In any  of  these  cases,  classical  serial  dilutions  of  the
pathogen  to  produce  1650  determinations with  the  predator may  not  be
useful if the effect is due to indirect mortality.
     The  geocorines  are  primarily   predaceous  lygaeids  with  some  plant
feeding  as  a  means   of getting  water.    Damage  to  plant  tissue  is
negligible:   the  value  of   geocorines  as   predators  of  crop  pests  is
great.   As  heteropterans, Geocoris punctipes  and  other ja.  spp.  probe
foods  with  their  piercing/sucking mouthparts.   Mobile prey  are  paralyzed
by  injection of a venom, and  body  fluids  and liquified body parts  are
ingested through the beak of these insects.
     As  heteropterans  Gi. punctipes is  a  hemimetabolous insect  with  3
stages  in  its  life cycle:   egg,  nymphal and  adult  stages.    The  nymphs
undergo  5  molts   in  becoming  adults.    The life  cycle  at  27°C  for  £.
punctipes  fed  budworm  or boll worm   eggs is  about  22 days  from  egg  to
adult,  7 days  of  egg  development and  in  excess  of  120 days as  adults.
Females  that have  been adults  for 2 - 4 days  can  lay 1  - 5 eggs/day  for
more  than  100 days.   Healthy adult  males weigh from  3  to  5 mg;  females
weigh  from  4 to 7  mg.   Both  adults  and  nymphs are strongly  predaceous  on
numerous  species   of   insect  and  mite  prey.    There   is   no  existing
literature  on  the effects  of  MPCA's  on J3.  punctipes  or  any  geocorine
lygaeid for that matter.

-------
                             TEST PROCEDURES
Summary of tests.
     Rickettsias,  protozons,  viruses,   and   bacteria   most  often   enter
insects orally  (via  os); therefore  the  tests recommended for  these  MPCAs
is  through food  contamination.   Fungi  often infect  insects  through  the
cuticle,  so  topical  application  is recommended for  these  MPCAs.   Specific
techniques  from Poinar  and  Thomas,  1978  are recommended for  inoculation
and diagnosis of each agent.
     The  tests  are  designed  to  test  direct  mortality,   the  indirect
mortality tests being  those  applied to various geocorine  prey  of numerous
taxa.   The species  of  predator described  here,  Geocoris  punctipes,  is
among  the most widely distributed,  abundant,  polyphagous  and economically
important  geocorines  (predaceous lygaeids).   While  they are not available
from  commercial  suppliers,   they  are  easily obtained from  agricultural
fields  and  readily cultured  by  methods  described by Champ!ain  and  Sholdt
(1967) on natural diet or by Cohen (1985) on artificial  diet.
     Test 1 assays  the toxicity  of ingested MPCAs  to  adult  females.   Test
2 assays  the  toxicity of topically  or externally applied MPCAs.  Tests  3
and  4  pertain  to ingested  and externally  applied MPCA's  in nymphal  Gu
punctipes.

TEST  1;  Adults  of  both sexes  are  placed  in containers with artificial
prey  that  have  been  inoculated  with   the  MPCA.   Containers  are  also
equipped  with cotton  wadding as  oviposition sites and  free  water  in  a
sponge-filled  Petri  dish (Cohen,  1985).  After  72 hours,  cotton  wadding
is  removed  for  inspection  and  counting of  eggs.   Every   3  days,  diet

-------
capsules  should be replaced; and  eggs should be counted.   This  procedure
should  be repeated 3 times  for a  total of  9 test days.   Eggs  should  be
removed  and discarded with  each count.  Initial  doses used should  be  at
the  proposed field rate  for that MPCA,  10X  and 1/1 OX the  proposed  field
rate  as  well as a  control  with no MPCA.  A  statistical  test  (ANOVA) must
be  used to  compare numbers of  eggs  from treated vs  control  individuals.
Should  any  adverse response be  noted at any  level  of MPCA concentration,
a  serial  dilution of  MPCA is  made  and  a full  dose  response  can  be
established.
TEST  2;   The floor of a  1  gallon ice-cream carton used  as  a  rearing cage
should  be sprayed  with  MPCA at  field concentration,  10X and  1/1 OX  field
concentration  and  an unsprayed control  should  be  concurrently  tested.
Diet  and water  should be provided,  and 6  adult  05.  punctipes, 3  of each
sex,  should be placed  in  each  of  the  containers.   Mortality should  be
measured  at  the end of a 48 hour  exposure  period.   Surviving £.  punctipes
should  be  re-located in  unsprayed  containers  (free  of MPCA)  that  are
marked to indicated MPCA exposure history (field, 10X, 1/10X and  control)
and  allowed  to oviposition  for  5  days (120 h).   Cotton wadding in 3X3  cm
sheets should  be placed  in cages as  an  oviposition  substrate.  At  the end
of  the  oviposition period  eggs on sheets and in  cages  should be  counted
and  incubated   for  10 days  at  27°C  and 70-80%  RH.   At  the  end of this
incubation  period  eggs   should  be  inspected so  that hatch  (fertility)
counts can  be  made.  Statistical  tests  (ANOVA)  should be used to  compare
means of % survival, fecundity,  and fertility.

-------
TEST 3:  Nymphal Development with MPCA in Diet
     Newly  hatched  1st instar  nymphs  of £.  punctipes  are provided  water
and  units  of artificial  diet for 15 days.   Diet units should, be  changed
every  third day.  By  the end of  this  period all surviving nymphs  should
have  reached the  3rd  instar nymphal  period.    Ten  of these  3rd  instar
nymphs  should  be placed  in a 1  gallon  rearing  contained  with diet  units
contained IX, 10X,  1/10X field  concentrations of the MPCA.  Water  should
be provided as  well  as 3 2X10 cm  strips of  tissue paper to provide  hiding
places  in   order to  reduce  cannibalism.   Diet  units  should  be  changed
every  other day.  At the end of 3 weeks, counts of  surviving  individuals
should be made and % adult eclosion determined.

TEST 4:  Nymphal Development with MPCA on Container Surface
     Test cage  is dipped or sprayed* with  MPCA or  heat-inactivated  MPCA
solution.    Surfaces   of   cages  should  be  IX,  10X,  or  1/1 OX   field
concentrations   or   control   (heat-inactivated  MPCA)   treatment.    The
conditions  should  otherwise  duplicate  those  of Test  3  with  3rd  Instar
nymphs  used  to  start the  test  and  3 weeks   of  exposure.   Counts  of
surviving individuals and % adult eclosion  should be made  for  statistical
comparison   (by  ANOVA).    Where  positive   tests are   Indicated,   serial
dilutions of MPCA and full dose response should  be established.
*Precautions should  be  taken to avoid  breathing  the aerosol, i.e.,  carry
out spraying in laminar flow hood.

-------
Test Species
     The  predator,  Geocorls punctlpes  can  be kept  In the laboratory  via
an  inhouse  colony maintained  on  artificial  diet  made  of  beef  liver,
hamburger  and  sucrose solution packaged  in stretched paraff 1m diet  units
as  described by Cohen,  1985.   Cultures of £.  punctlpes or other  species
of  Geocoris  can be  started from field-collected  samples.   The use  of  an
artificial diet  obviates rearing of  prey  as  food sources both of  nymphal
and adult  stages, greatly simplifying tests of MPCAs.
     MPCAs   obtained   from   the   manufacturer  should  be  tested   in  the
formulation expected to be used under commercial conditions.

Test Conditions
     During  testing,  as   in  rearing,  both  adults  and   nymphs   of   §.
punctlpes  (or  other  geocorines)  should  be  kept  1n  a  growth chamber  at
27°C^  1°C, 40  - 50% RH  with a  16 hour photophase.  Because of a  constant
potential  of  cannibalism  In  J5.  punctlpes.   crowding  should  be  avoided
(I.e., no  more than 5 individuals/500  ml  of rearing  space).  Also strips
of  tissue paper wadded  and placed  on  the  cage  bottom are  helpful   in
averting  cannibalism.    For purposes  of  standardization,  strips  of  the
same  dimensions and  the  same  number  should  be  provided  in  all  tests.
Containers such  as  1  pint Ice cream cartons  with  tops replaced by  organdy
screen are suitable  for  groups  of 5 or 6 £.  punctlpes.  Petrl  dishes (7-9
mm  diameter)   fitted  with  a  sponge  are  adequate  watering   devices.
Stretched  parafilm  feeding  units  (Cohen,  1985) are  essential  for  allowing
feeding.

-------
Number of Predators In Treatment Groups
     The number  of test predators per treatment  should  be  no less  than 40
and  preferably   100,   with  the  same  number   In   each   control   group.
Locations  of eggs  should  be marked  with  India ink  to  simplify  counting.
This is  especially important with  eggs  deposited into  cotton  wadding.   A
total of 40-100 eggs per test dose should be evaluated.

Preparation and Quantification of Test Materials
     The  MPCA  should  be   prepared  using  the manufacturer's  directions.
Initially, rates  tested should include  the proposed field rate, 1/10  the
field  rate,  and   10X  the  field   rate.    If  significant  mortality   or
reduction  in fecundity or fertility  is observed at these rates,   then  a
dose response  should  be conducted  using at least 4  treatment  rates and  a
water control.

Application Methods
     MPCAs  can  be added  to the  diet  during diet  preparation  when  the
sucrose/H20   solution  is   added   to  the   homogenized   meat  mixture.
Calculations of  the appropriate  dilution  are based  on  the fact that  the
sucrose  solution  constitutes  6%  of  the  final  diet on  a  volume/weight
basis.
     Application of MPCAs   for tests  involving dried residues  is achieved
by spraying  appropriate doses  on  the  cage surface  using  a Potter  spray
tower (available  from Burkard Mfg.  Co.  Ltd.,  Woodcock Hill,  Rickmanworth,
Hertfordshire, WD3 IPS, England)  or  a substitute  such as  a propellent
spray apparatus  such  as  CrownR  Spray-Tool  Power  Pak  (Crown Industrial

-------
                                                                         8
Products  Co.,  Hebron,  111.  60034),  which  contains a  chlorofluorocarbon
under  pressure (62  Ibs.   at  70°F).   Separate  plastic  tubes and  bottles
should  be   kept   for  each  MPCA   used  to  reduce  the   likelihood   of
contamination  of   the  holding  container with  previously-used MPCA.   All
sprays  should be  conducted in  a  laminar flow hood  and  the  test  personnel
should  wear  gloves,  laboratory  coats, and masks.  Care  should be  taken to
avoid contamination  of personnel  and the environment.   Waste MPCAs should
be properly disposed of.

Post Treatment Observations
     Test 1 — Adults
     Survival  of   adults   should  be  monitored  48  hours  after  onset  of
exposure  to  diets  or substrates  treated  with  MPCAs.   Egg  production
(fecundity)  should  be monitored  1  week  after  exposure  and  egg  hatch
(fertility)  should be  monitored  until  10  days after the  last eggs were
laid.
     Survival  and  adult  eclosion  of  nymphal   (i.   punctipes  should   be
monitored for each treatment both  in nymphs  given  MPCA treated  diet  and
in  surface-exposed  individuals.   Mean  %  survival  and   mean   %  adul.t
eclosion  should be  monitored  after 3  weeks of  exposure  to dietary  or
surface-contacted MPCA's.

-------
     Reporting:
     Test  data  should  be  recorded  as  described  above.   Data  submitted
should include the following:
1.  Name  of  the  test, sponsor, test  laboratory,  study  director,  principal
investigator, and dates of testing.
2.  A  detailed description of the test MPCA,  including  the  formulation  of
concentration.  Include the type of dilutions carried out.
3.   Detailed  information  about  the  source  of G.  punctipes  used,  and
history  of  indigenous  disease,  if  known.   Age  of test  subjects,  test
conditions   (temperature,   lighting  level  and  duration,   and   relative
humidity) should be included.
4.   Describe  the  test substrates,  dimensions,  number  of test  predators
per cage, and number of replicates per dilution of MPCA.
5.   The  percentage  of   test  subject   dead   at  each   dose  after  each
observation period should be reported.
6.   For  long-term  tests  of  nymphs,  the  mean  duration  in  days  of  the
nymphal period,  the  percentage successful  emergence  of  adults, and  %  egg
hatch of 20 pairs of adults should be reported.
7.  If  a  dose response is conducted, the statistical test used  should  be
reported  (logit  or probit).   Minimal  data reported would include the 1650
and confidence interval, the slope, and intercept.
8.  Any  deviation  from this  test  protocol should be reported, as well  as
anything  unusual  about the  test  such as  temperature fluctuation, disease
problems in the predators, etc.

-------
                                                                        10

                                References

Champlain, R. A., and L. L. Sholdt.  1967.  Life history of Geocoris
          punctipes (Henriptera: Lygaeidae) in the laboratory"Ann.
          tntomol. Soc. Am. 60:881-3.

Cohen, Allen C.  1985.  Simple Method for Rearing the Insect Predator
          Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) on a Meat Diet.
          d. Econ. Entomol. 78: 1173-75.

Cooper, D. J.  1981.  The Role of Predatory Henri ptera in Disseminating a
          Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus of Heliothis Punctiger.
          J. Aust. ent. Soc. 20: 145-50.
Dunbar, D. M., and 0. G. Bacon.  1972a.  Influence of temperature on
          development and reproduction of Geocoris atricolor, G.  pal
          and JG. punctipes from California"!  Environ. Entomol.~"1:596

Dunbar, D. M., and 0. G. Bacon.  1972b.  Feeding, development and
          reproduction of Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae
          eight diets.  Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.  65:892-5.
Poinar, G. 0., Jr. and G. M. Thomas.  1978.  Diagnostic Manual  for the
          Identification of Insect Pathogens.  Plenum Press, New York
          218 pp.

Steinhaus, E. A.  1949.  Principles of Insect Pathology.  McGraw Hill,
          New York, 757 pp.

Wilkinson,J. D., K. D. Biever, and C. M. Ignoffo.  1975.  Contact
          Toxicity of Some Chemical and Biological  Pesticides to Several
          Insect Parasitoids and Predators.  Entomophaga 20(1):113-120.

Wilkinson, J. D; K. D. Biever, and C. M. Ignoffo.  1979.  Synthetic
          Pyrethroid and Organophosphate Insecticides Against the
          Parasitoid Apanteles marginiventris and the Predators Geocoris
          ^_^	:onvergen!
          J. Econ. Entomol. 72(4):473-75.
punctipes. Hippodamfa convergens, and Podisus maculiventris.

-------
                           Progress Report 'to EPA
                     8/1/85  to 1/31/86 (first 6 months)

Methods for Assessing Fate of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms  in Soil
                           Grant No.  CR812476-01
           J.M.  Tiedje  and B.K. Chelm, Co-Principal  Investigators
                         Michigan State  University

Extraction, purification and probing soil DNA
     We have developed a protocol for the extraction of total bacterial DNA
from soil.  Previously used protocols for the extraction of bacterial DNA
from soil involve the use of trichloroacetic acid treatment, followed by
ethanol/ether extraction of soil bacterial fractions filtered through acid-
washed diatomaceous earth (1), or purification of DNA from detergent, and
high-salt by hydroxyapatite column chromatography (2).  However,  because we
anticipate the necessity of isolating bacterial DNA of sufficient purity
for use in hybridization studies from large numbers of soil samples,  it was
desirable to develop a procedure that would allow the simultaneous
processing of multiple soil samples and yield high molecular weight  DNA, in
a concentrated and purified form, in a short period of time.
     The DNA isolation protocol which we have developed involves  an  initial
separation of soil bacteria from fungal biomass and soil debris.   This
separation involves multiple rounds of homogenization of the soil into a
buffered salt solution followed by fractionated centrifugation.   This
fractionated centrifugation technique was developed by Goksoyr and co-
workers (3) and involves first a low-speed centrifugation step.   This low
speed centrifugation pellets the fungal biomass and the soil debris  in the
homogenate while leaving the soil bacteria in the supernatant. A second
high-speed centrifugation step pellets the soil bacteria contained in the
supernatant from the low-speed centrifugation.  The pellet from the  low-
speed centrifugation is extracted a second and third time to enhance the
yield of soil bacteria.  Using this protocol, more than 50% of the bacteria
contained in the soil sample are isolated after three rounds of
homogenization/centrifugation.  Additional rounds of
homogenization/centrifugation serve to isolate additional soil bacteria but
in increasingly lower proportions (3,4).  It appears that-the distribution
of the different bacterial types remains constant through eight rounds of
homogenization/centrifugation such that the bacterial fraction,  after the
first round of purification, is presumed to be as representative  of  the
entire bacterial population present in the soil as the combined bacterial
fraction after eight rounds of purification (4).   Since three rounds of
purification yields about 50% of the bacterial population and is
representative of the entire bacterial population, and further rounds of
purification yield diminishing amounts of bacteria, we used three rounds of
purification by fractionated centrifugation in our protocol.
     The purified bacterial fraction is  then lysed using a protocol  which
is derived from, and includes the salient features of, several individual
lysis protocols designed for use with various type of bacteria.   We  have
combined the important features of several lysis protocols in an  effort to
insure the maximal disruption of the various types of bacteria present in
the natural soil population.  The purified bacterial fraction is  first
washed in 2% sodium hexametaphosphate pH 8.5 and then washed twice in
Crorabach's buffer (Tris-HCl 33 mM, EDTA 1 mM, pH 8..5) as described by V.L.
Torsvik (2).  The cells are then incubated for 10 min in Crombach's  buffer
brought to 1 M with NaCl.  This incubation in high concentrations of NaCl
is necessary for the efficient lysis of slow-growing species of RhLzobia.

-------
 (5).  The cells are then collected by centirifugation and resuspended in TS
 (Tris-HCl 50 mM, NaCl 50 mH, pH 8.5) to which Sarkosyl is added to a final
 concentration of 0.1%.  Prewashing in 0.1% Sarkosyl allows for more
 efficient lysis of lysozyme refractory strains of bacteria, presumably by
 making the cell wall more susceptible to attack by lysozyme by some, as
 yet, unknown mechanism (6).  The cells are again collected by
 centrifugation and resuspended in a sucrose solution (sucrose, 0.75 K;
 Tris-HCl, 50 mM, pH 8.5; EDTA, 10 mM) and incubated on ice for 20 min.
 Lysozyme is then added to a final concentration of 5 mg/ml, followed by
 incubation at 37°C for 1 h.  Pronase is then added to a concentration of
 0.625 mg/ml followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h.  Following the 37°C
 incubation, the mixture is heated to 60°C at which time Sarkosyl is added
 to a final concentration of 1% followed by incubation for 10 min at 60°C.
 The lysate mixture can now be kept on ice overnight.
     The lysate mixture is then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4°C for 30
 min.  The supernatant from this centrifugation is used to prepare cesium
 chloride-ethidium bromide gradients for equilibrium centrifugation.
 Following equilibrium centrifugation the total bacterial DNA can be
 visualized as a discrete band in the gradient using long-wave ultraviolet
 light.  The DNA band is fractionated from the gradient and extracted in
 isopropanol, precipitated, by ethanol and extracted with phenol according
 to standard techniques.  DNA purified as just described is at least 47
 kilobases long and is not subject to degradation under standard conditions
 for nuclease digestion.  The addition of exogenous restriction
 endonucleases under the same conditions shows that the DNA can readily be
 digested to completion.
     We are currently performing hybridization experiments on DNA isolated
 from soil in order to determine the lowest level at which a particular DNA
 sequence can be present and still be detectable.  These experiments involve
 combining genomic DNA isolated from a Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain which
 contains the gene for kanamycin resistance in its chromosome with the DNA
 proportions such that there is essentially an end-point dilution of the B.
 japonicum DNA into the soil DNA.  The DNAs are digested with the
 restriction endonuclease Hind III then subjected to agarose gel
 electrophoresis followed by Southern transfer to nitrocellulose filters.
 The filters are then probed using pkC7 DNA which has been alpha labeled
 with   p by nick-translation.  pKC7 contains the gene for kanamycin
 resistance.  In this way, we will be able to determine the lowest limit at
 which the DNA sequence must be present in order to be detected by
 hybridization.

 DNA hybridization as a method for quantitation of a dechlorinating isolate
 in mixed communities.
     The dechlorinating bacterium,  DCB-1, is able to remove halogen atoms
 from the aromatic ring of some toxic compounds.   Because of this
 dechlorination property, it is the type of organism that will be
 "engineered" for proposed release to treat hazardous wastes.  DCB-1 is a
 member of an anaerobic consortium able to completely degrade
 chlorobenzoate.   The other members of the consortium include a benzoate
 degrading organism and methanogens.   Quantitation of various members of the
 consortium is complicated by the dependence of the benzoate degrader on the
 methanogen, and the strict anaerobic requirements of all the members.
 Therefore,  the purpose of these experiments is to adapt.existing DNA-
hybridization techniques to quantitation of DCB-1 in these unique cultures.
 Since DCB-1 is a very unusual bacterium with no known relatives, its DNA
may be somewhat more unique than for many natural isolates.  Since the

-------
consortium is a simple, defined interacting microbial community,  it can
serve as a model for development of these techniques for more complex
systems.  In addition, we are interested in looking for the presence of
DCB-1, or a similar organism, in other anaerobic samples enriched for
degradation of halogenated toxic compounds.
     DNA was first isolated from anaerobic enrichments and pure cultures.
The isolated DNA was purified and spotted onto a nitrocellulose filter.
Genomic DNA from DCB-1 was nick-translated to serve as a radioactive probe
for similar DNA on the filter.  The DNA was hybridized to the filter and
the amount of hybridization was quantified by autoradiography.  Intensity
of the autoradiographic signal corresponds with the degree of hybridization
and indicates the amount of like DNA in the samples.
     A variety of cultures were probed with the dechlorinator DNA.  These
included the consortium of which DCB-1 is known to be a member, a
chlorophenol degrading enrichment, a phenol enrichment, and lambda DNA.
The phenol enrichment and lambda DNA each served as negative controls.  The
phenol enrichment is not enriched for degradation of halogenated aromatic
compounds, and does not express dechlorination activity.
     We are .in the process of probing DNA isolated from a sediment enriched
for the bromobenzoate degradation.  In addition, we will receive cultures
which express dehalogenase-like activity from other sources (e.g. Germany
and Battelle Laboratories, Columbus, OH).
     Table 1 shows the results of our first two experiments.

Table 1.  Percent hybridization of DCB-1 DNA to various cultures.
Source of DNA	]	% hybridization to DCB-1 DNA

DCB-1*                                        100, 100
Consortium*                                    50, 50
Chlorophenol Enrichment
Phenol Enrichment                                 3
Lambda*                                         0, 0
                                                    **
Bromobenzoate Enrichment                        N.D.
Methanogen and Benzoate Degrader                N.D.
      (from consortium)
Methanogen only                                 N.D.
	(from consortium)	__

   Results from two independent experiments.
^
   Not enough DNA was extracted from this culture to obtain a reliable
estimate.
•Jf-Jf
   N.D. Not determined.  We are in the process of analyzing these cultures.

     The chlorobenzoate-degrading consortium which includes DCB-1 as a
member has 50% DNA hybridization to the dechlorinator  (Table 1).  It will
be interesting to see the results of hybridization to  the DNA of the
benzoate-degrading organism, and the methanogen.  This should tell us the
amount of hybridization to other members of the consortium due to similar
DNA sequences in these organisms.  It should then be possible to more
accurately quantitate DCB-1 in the consortium.
     DNA hybridization is a useful method for quantitatiorr of the- presence
and concentration of DCB-1 in various anaerobic cultures.  This method
should also prove to be a useful technique for quantitation of other
organisms in other complex environments, such as soil.

-------
Development of a soil core microcosm
     We have been testing, modifying and retesting soil core designs that
allow the detection of survival, transport and plasmid survival.and
transfer of introduced soil bacteria.  In our proposal we had fL argued that
conventional selective markers were the only established reliable and
sensitive method for monitoring organism fate.   Therefore, one aspect of
our research program was to further develop the use of this methodology as
well as to use it for comparison with the gene  probe methodology.  Our
approach uses the following principles:
     1.  The test method stresses reliability which in its broadest sense
means good recoverability of viable GEMs or of  the novel gene(s) and good
reproducibility of environmental conditions.   It also stresses cost-
effectiveness so that many different GEMs or simulated conditions can be
evaluated at one time.
     2.  Optimum conditions for survival and genetic transfer between
microorganisms are maintained to ensure a worst case scenario.  Also,
natural soil bacteria have been used as test organisms as these have the
best chance for survival.
     3.  Genetic donor and recipient bacteria are added to the soil.  Both
have chromosomal antibiotic resistance markers  for easy selection and
enumeration.  Use of two organisms in one column allows obtaining  .
information on fate and survival of two organisms rather than one as well
as provides an optimum recipient to increase the chance of obtaining
genetic exchange.  The donors contain high-frequency of transfer
conjugative plasmids which offer the best route for genetic transfer
between bacteria.
     The outline of the experiment is given in Fig. 1 where C0101 is the
genetic donor of plasmid pDGlOl and CB101 is the potential recipient.
After addition to soil the bacteria are enumerated by selective plating
using resistance markers contained by each and the combined resistance
markers of the transconjugant progeny.
     Our microcosm involves use of a packed soil column (Fig. 2) to which
the donor and recipient bacteria are added.  The core has two injection
ports for the bacteria.  The donor is injected in the top, the recipient in
the bottom.  Thus, the donor must be physically moved through the core by
water percolation to reach the recipient for DNA transfer to take place.
This method overcomes the problem of mixing large numbers of donors and
recipients together and thereby enhancing conjugation by artificially
creating a close physical presence.  Bacteria were collected from the core
either by percolating water through and collecting the effluent and by
sacrificing the cores and extracting the bacteria by blending soil samples
in a diluent which dislodges the bacteria from soil particles.  This method
also allows us to discern the effect of percolation on bacterial movement
from the point of inoculation.  Some of these cores were planted to wheat
and others to corn to determine the effect plant roots had on transport,
survival and genetic exchange.
     We have approached the question of the fate of the GEM by using a
tiered system of analysis.  The sequence outlined below offers a cost-
effective approach.  The initial screening for GEM survival is inexpensive
and may preclude more difficult and expensive procedures used for genome
detection and identification of GEM physical location.

-------
                                      Non-viable
  I.  Establish viability of GEM  	£>  Rapid death


    Viable ,
                                          Non-detectable
 II.  Establish fate of genome of interest 	-^.  Genome loss
1                                                         precludes  need to
            Genome detected                              assess physical
                                                         location of  GEM
III.  Establish physical location of GEM.

     We have gone through this approach using a natural soil bacterium,
CorynebacCerium flaccumfaciens, to assess  its usefulness:
     I.  Viability of GEM-Extraction of bacteria by blending soil samples
and enumeration by selectively plating demonstrated an ideal population
number for the bacterium of approximately 10 -10 /g soil (Fig. 3).  This
number remained constant for a period of over 3 months.  We successfully
extracted 10-100% of added bacteria.  The method of recovery by percolation
yielded approximately 1% of the introduced number but has allowed us  to
follow bacterial translocation through soil.  We have demonstrated  that
plant roots  enhance movement by 2X the number of bacteria obtained  in the
effluent without plant roots (Fig. 4).
     II.  The genes of focus confer resistance to heavy metals and  are
located on a high frequency of transfer plasmid in the donor bacterium.
The genome remained stable within the donor population even without
selective pressure.  The genome also was transferred to recipient bacteria
at low frequencies.
     Our immediate goal for the future is  to establish the detection  limits
for bacteria and for genomes in soil.  To  presume loss of a gene or of the
GEM, it must be non-detectable under sufficiently sensitive conditions.  By
our extraction method we hope to reach the point of detecting 1 bacterium/g
soil out of  a natural population of 10 /g soil.  We also plan to include
soil derived Pseudomonas and Rhizobium strains in our soil core system in
the near future.
                                REFERENCES

 1.   Lid Torsvik, V. and Goksoyr,  J.   1977.   Soil Biol.  Biochem.  10:7-12.

 2.   Lid Torsvik, V. personal communication.

 3.   Faegri,  A., Lid Torsvik, V.  and Goksoyr,  J.   1976.   Soil Biol.
      Biochem.  9:105-112.

 4.   Bakken,  L.R.  1985.  Appl. Environ.  Microbiol. 49:1482-1487.

 5.   Denarie, J., Boistard, P., Casse-Delbart, F. Atherly,  A.G.,  Berry,
      J.O.  and Russel, P.  1981.   pp. 225-246.  In K.L.  Giels and A.G.
      Atherly (eds.) International Review of Cytology.  Supplement 13,
      Biology of the Rhizobiaceae.  Academic Press.

 6.   Schwinghamer, E.A.  1980.  FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 7:157-162.

-------
Figure 1 .
    OUTLINE OF EXPERIMENT
     C0101
    Smr Tcr
   pDG10l(ArsarArsir)
CB101
Rfr Nar
            SOIL COLUMN
                        „
       BACTERIA  EXTRACTED
       SELECTIVE  PLATING
                 CB101
  TRANSCONJUGANT
                   1. PLASMID ISOLATION ;-:
                   2. COLONY HYBRIDIZATION

-------
Figure 2
                       INJECTION  PORT
                           (DONOR)
                       INJECTION PORT
                          (RECIPIENT)
                       WIRE MESH

-------
                                    Bacterial Survival in Soil Cores
                1E+09 -•
                1E+08 •-
* cells/g  soil 1E+07--
                1E+06--
                1E+05-.
                1E+04
                              0x5
1         1.5         2
    Time  (weeks)
2.5

-------
Figure 4
  BACTERIAL RECOVERY FROM SOIL CORES

  108
                    x	CO (wheat)
                    o—-CO (no wheat)
                    o	CB (no wheat)
                    x	CB (wheat)
                  DAYS

-------
                                      ASA  --  CSSA  --  S-SSA            Title-Summary No.   S3-31

   Iplete  two  (2)  copies.
   he  interpretive  summary you  prepare is  designed for  people who are not familiar with your
   ork, yet are  interested in what you are doing.   Please  make sure that your summary  is
   Ilearly written and easy to understand by nonscientific  people.  Be sure to indicate the
   roper  address  to use in requesting  a news  release  about your research.  Keep the interpretiv
   ummary simple!   This is not  an abstract.
Title:  A Soil Column Method for Assessing the Effect of Plant Roots on Movement and Plasmid
       Transter or Conjugative Bacteria
^hors:  P.F. DWYER*,  J.R.  KNUTSON, C.W. RICE,  and J.M. TIEDJE	

itjHmary:
 •           With the  advent of molecular engineering the production of bacteria with novel
        genotypes has  become more than academic.   Soil is the environment most conducive to
        viability for  many  types of bacteria.  We have, therefore, attempted to devise a test
        method to concurrently assess both the fate of a bacterium added to soil and the
        frequency of transfer of the novel genotype contained by that bacterium.  As our test
        organisms we have used bacteria harboring plasmids with genetoypes that are not
        commonly found among soil bacteria.   We used bacteria with plasmid-coded traits
        because plasmids theoretically represent the greatest possibility for gene transfer.
             The test  method assesses population changes,  ie. whether the bacterium will die-
        off or become  established in soil.  It is important to have a high sensitivity of
        detection for  viable cells.  Thus, we used antibiotic resistant bacteria for the
        purpose of selective plating of viable cells on appropriate media.  To assess gene
        transfer we have designed our method such that both a plasmid-donor and plasmid-
        recipient strain are present in the soil.  But to ensure that the method of addition
        does not prejudice  gene transfer the two strains are physically separated and the
        plasmid-donor  must  be transported by water-saturated flow through the soil to effect
        transconjugation (i.e.  plasmid transfer).  Our experiments have demonstrated three
        things (1)  our bacterial strains rapidly die off after addition to soil (2)
        transconjugation occurs at low detectable frequencies before the die-off, (3)
        bacterial movement  through soil is facilitated by the presence of plant roots.
  ilinq address for your employer's office           Mailing address for corresponding author:
   oublic relations:
  rce Charles Downs, Frf-it-n-r TTT P,.Mir p»Tat-tnnc      Name  Mr. Daryl F. Dwyer _
  dress ns T.-mrnn Hall _         Address Dept. of Microbiology and Public
        Michigan Sl-afe TTm'vPTgi fy    _ -               -      Hpalt-T-i^ M-ioV<  
-------
                               ABSTRACT FORM —AGRONOMY ABSTRACTS

              American Society of Agronomy — Crop Science Society of America — Soil Science Society of America
  Type one perfect copy following closely the directions below.
       Division and Title-Summary No.   53—31
                  A  Soil Column Method for  Assessing the Effect of Plant Roots
                         on Movement  and Plasmid Transfer of Conjugative
                         Bacteria. D.F. DWYER*. J.R.  KNUTSON,  C.W.  RICE, and
                         J.M.  TIEDJE,  Michigan State  Univ.
                  A  test method was  devised for assessing  the fate of plasmid-
                  containing  bacteria added to soil  as to  (a) survival, (b)
                  movement with water percolation, and (c)  frequency of
                  plasmid transfer.   The plasmid-donor was  CorynebacCerium
                  flaccumfaciens subsp. oortiL (C0101) which harbors plasmid
                  (pDGlOl) that encodes resistance to arsenite and arsenate.
                  The plasmid-recipient was,  C. flaccumfacLens subsp. oorti
                  (CB101).  Both had chromosomal markers for antibiotic
                  resistances allowing for  selective plating of donor (Tet,
                  Str,  arsenite, arsenate),  recipient (Nal, Rif,  Amp) or
                  transconjugants (Nal, Rif,  Amp x arsenite,  arsenate).  The
                  donor was added to the top layer of a packed-soil column,
                  the recipient to the bottom; some  columns contained wheat.
                  The bacteria were  leached through  the column.   The added
                  bacterial strains  were detected  in the effluent for at least
                  3  weeks.  The minimum number detectable  represented 200
                  CFU/gra soil.   Root channeling increased  the number of        j
                  bacteria in the effluent.   Transconjugants occurred at low  j
                  frequencies in columns with or without wheat.                 |
                  Mailing Address of Corresponding Author:
                                       Title and name
                                         Department
                          University or other organization
                             Street or P.O. Box if needed
                                City, State, ZIP CODE
Mr.  Daryl F.  Dwyer
Dept.  of Microbiology and Public Health
Michigan State University
East Lansing,  Michigan  48824
DIRECTIONS:
1) List ihe Division and Title-Summary number, e.g., A5-27, C3-77, S4-65, A3-I1P, as shown on the Title-Summary acknowledgment
   card.
2) This copy will be the photocopy for offset printing. No editorTal corrections will be made. Any part of the abstract not WITHIN the
   above boxed area is lost in reproduction. See reverse side for sample abstract. We suggest that you try a practice abstract before making
   the final copy.
3) Title and Authors— Start the title flush left and below top line. Indent each succeeding line in the title-author listing to the fifth space.
   Capiialize only the first letter of each major word in the title. Underline the title. List the authors with the initials first. CAPITALIZE
   ALL LAST NAMES OF AUTHORS.  If more than one author, add an asterisk * to name of person presenting paper. Institution(s)
   follow authors' names; use abbreviations as suggested on reverse side.  Include location by city and state only when federal agency or
   commercial firm is the sole one involved.
4) Do not leave a blank space between title-author listing and text. Type text as one paragraph, starting first line flush left.
                                               (over)

-------
 PROGRESS REPORT                                                G. Stotzky
                                                                 CR812484
                               Transformation Studies


      Preliminary transformation studies are being conducted with Bacillus subtilis strain
IS-75 as the recipient (obtained from Dr. Issar Smith, Public Health Research Institute of
the City of New York; PHRI) and B. subtilis strain BD307 (obtained from Dr. David
Dubnau, PHRI) as the donor of the transforming DNA. Strain IS-75 is auxotrpphic for
histidine (hisAl), leucine (leuAS), and methionine (metBS), and strain BD307 is
auxotrophic for pyrimidine (pyr26) and leucine (Ieu2).

      DNA from BD307 was purified, using standard techniques (e.g., Dubnau et al.,
1971), and its efficiency of transformation was measured by addine various amounts, in a
volume of 8 ;ul, to a constant quantity (100 jil containing ca. 7 x 10° cells) of competent
IS-75 cells (the time of competency was determined earlier in growth studies),  and the
transform ants were enumerated, after incubation for 30 min at 33 C with shaking, on
Spizizen agar augmented with histidine and leucine (i.e., transformation of the gene
coding for methionine was measured). Although the transformation of other
combinations of the three auxotrophic markers of IS-75 could have been studied, the
efficiency of transformation of these genes on DNA from BD307 would probably be
equal, and therefore, for these preliminary studies, only the transformation of  the gene
coding for methionine was measured. The transformation frequency (TF; number of
transformed cells X 100/number of total cells) showed a direct linear relationship to the
concentration of DNA added (Fig. 1). In subsequent experiments, lO^ig DNA (in 8;ul)
was used.  However, as this concentration of DNA was diluted in subsequent experiments
(e.g., by the addition of clay suspensions, DNase solutions), the effect of dilution on the
TF was determined.  Even a ten-fold dilution yielded respectable and easily measurable
TF values (Fig. 2).                                    N

      To determine the effect of the clay mineral, montmorillonite (M), on the TF,
various amounts of the clay (Bentonite, Fisher Scientific Co., which contains only M and
a small amount of mica) were reacted with 10,ug DNA for 4 h on a rotating wheel at
33 C, and  the M-DNA mixture was then incubated with 100 ^il of competent cells for 30
min at 33  C with shaking. There was a linear decrease in TF as the concentration of the
clay was increased (Fig. 3). It has not been established whether this decrease was the
result of the adsorption and binding  of the DNA on M, of a competition between M and
DNA  for DNA-binding sites on the recipient cells, or of other factors. However, when M,
DNA, and cells were incubated directly for 30 min, the TF was similar to that obtained
after reaction of M and DNA for 4 h before incubation with the cells, suggesting that
surface interactions between M and  DNA  were less important in reducing the TF than
were  possible steric effects of the clay  at the cell surface. The reasons for the decrease
in TF caused by M will be determined in future studies.

      DNA and M (at a ratio  of lO^ug DNA/mg M) were reacted for 4 h, as above, and a
100 ;ul aliquot containing 10;og DNA and 1 mg M was incubated  with 100 .ul of cells for 30
min at 33  C with shaking, and the number of transformants was enumerated. The
remaining M-DNA mixture was then centrifuged (40,000 g for 10 min, refrigerated), a
100 ,ul aliquot of the supernatant was incubated, as above, with  100 ;il of cells,  and the
TF was  determined. On the basis of the TF, the amount of DNA actually present was
estimated from a standard curve (Fig. 1) of the TF in the absence of clay (S  in Fig. 4).

-------
The clay pellet was then resuspended in deonized water to yield 1 mg M/100^1, and 100
}A of the suspension was incubated, as above, with 100 ^ul of cells, and the TF was
determined.  The amount of DNA associated with M was deduced by subtracting the
amount of DNA apparently present in supernatant 1 (S.) from the amount originally
added (i.e., 10 ,ug), and this value was plotted against the TF obtained (P^ in Fig. 4). The
pellet was then centrifuged, the TFs of the supernatant ($2) and the subsequently
resuspended pellet (?2) were determined, as above, and the procedure was repeated once
more (83, P3).  These results showed again that the presence of M reduces the TF, that
this reduction is linear and independent of the concentration of DNA, and that the DNA
associated with M neither loses its transforming ability nor is tightly bound. The latter
was further shown by the high amount of DNA that was recovered from M by the three
sequential washings of the clay-DNA mixture (Fig.  5).

     To determine whether the presence of M affects the degradation  of DNA by DNase,
10,ug DNA and 1 mg M (in 80,ul) were reacted for 4 h, as above, various concentrations
of DNase (bovine pancreas DNase 1; Sigma) (in 20^11) were then reacted with the M-DNA
mixture for 30  min at 37 C without shaking, and the 100 ;ul mixture  was then incubated
with 100>il of cells for 30 min at 33 C with shaking. The addition of DNase, even at
DNase:DNA ratios of 1:1, 10:1,  and 100:1, had no significant effect  on the TF in the
absence of M.  Only at a ratio of 1000:1 was there a decrease in the TF to undeteetable
levels. Similar results were obtained in the presence of M, except that the  TF values
were several logs lower, reflecting the previously observed reduction in TF  in the
presence of M,  and the data were more variable.  These preliminary studies suggested
that M does not affect the degradation of DNA by DNase. However, the conditions used
in these studies were not conducive to the enzymatic activity of DNase (e.g., no buffer
and no Mg were added), which probably explains the low activity of  DNase at DNase:DNA
ratios below 1000:1.

     All of the above studies, with additional permutations, are being repeated.
Furthermore, other clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite, attapulgite), with  different cations on
the exchange complex, will be evaluated in these and other transformation systems.

-------
Of
Si
     I


-3
-2
              PA/A
-I
                      (J
                                 o
                        . I

-------
    l.c
I
I
      u
                                                        1

-------
J
\J
        o
6.01      6.1
l.d
                               . 3

-------
             /   \-
                  r
—.>-*
a
 v>
                  i
                  i
1 1 i
-3 -4 -/
i
0
1
i
I
i
i
1

-------
VJ
 vu
  VJ
 V-0
        '  \
       o
                              I

-------
    /F
 a  i] i
 ns / r
\^

    5
VU
£

S  ^
V-
      L//-
     o
                           \
                            \
               +-CAAY
  \
   \   •
     \
     \
\     \
 \
                                \
                                     \
           \

-------
                                                         G. Stotzky
                                                         CR812484
                                 Transduction Studies

      The initial transduction studies are being conducted with a temperature-sensitive
strain of the generalized transducing bacteriophage, Pl::Cm cts.  This strain is
essentially temperate at 37 C and lytic at 42 C, carries a gene conferring resistance to
chloramphenicol (Cm), has a broad host range, and in the prophage stage, remains
autonomous in the cytoplasm, thereby  mimicking plasmids and bridging to our  earlier
studies with true plasmids.

      Lysates of phage PI have been prepared by two methods: 1) heat induction of a
lysogenic strain of Escherichia coli DU1040(P1) and 2) infection of E. coli W3110 with
phage PI in liquid culture followed by heat induction of lysis.  Both methods produced
lysates containing liters as high as 10  PFU/ml.

      Lactose-positive strains of E. coli have been verified for the absence of  phage  PI
and, if Ivsogenic for phage PI, have been cured. For example, E_. coli K802 was cured by
growth at 30 C until log phase followed by culture at 42 C. The lysate was then plated
on MacConkey Agar (MAC), incubated  at 37 C, and resultant colonies were replica plated
to MAC containing 30 ug/ml Cm. Colonies that appeared to be cured (i. e., growth on
MAC but not on MAC + Cm) were subcultured on MAC and verified as E. coli by the
Enterotube II system (Roche Diagnostics Inc.). These cultures will be verified as being
cured of PI by their resistance to lysis at 42 C.  Numerous strains of E_. coli that are
nonlysogenic for phage PI are now available.

      The multiplicity of infection (MOD for the transduction of resistance to  Cm by
phage PI to E_. cob'  W3110 m vitro was then determined, to provide guidelines  for the
ratios of the~phage  and the~bacterium to be used in soil studies.  The transduction
frequencies for different MOIs were:

                    MQI                       Transduction frequency (%)

                    9.5                             6.6 x  10"1
                    6.6                             5.1 x  10";
                    2.7                             4.8 x  10~;
                    0.27                          <: 1.0 x  lO'1*

      On the bases of these data, studies on transduction in soil have been initiated, using
E_. coli W3110 and Pseudomonas fluorescens PAO1 and phage  PI at an MOI of 3, in both
sterile and nonsterile soil.  These studies have been designed  to determine the 1) survival
of the recipient bacterial species, 2) survival of  the phage, 3) transduction of introduced
bacterial species, and 4) transduction of indigenous bacteria.  As these studies have been
initiated concurrent with the preparation of this biannual progress report, watch the
annual report for the results of these and subsequent studies.

-------
        Publications supported, in part, by Cooperative Agreement No. CR812484
Stotzky, G. and Babich, H. 1986, Survival of, and genetic transfer by, genetically
        engineered bacteria in natural environments. In Advances in Applied
        Microbiology, A. I. Laskin, ed. Academic Press, N.Y.  pp. 93-138 (in press).

Stotzky, G. 1986.  Influence of soil mineral colloids on metabolic processes, growth,
        adhesion, and ecology of microbes and viruses.  In Interaction of Soil Minerals
        with Natural Organics and Microbes, P.  M. Huang et al., eds. Soil Science Society
        of America, Madison, WI.  pp. 305-428 (in press).

Devanas, M. A., Rafaeli-Eshkol, D., and Stotzky, G.  1986.  Survival of plasmid-containing
        strains of Escherichia coli in soil:  effect of  plasmid size and nutrients on
        survival of hosts and maintenance of plasmids.  Applied and  Environmental
        Microbiology (in press).

Devanas, M. A. and Stotzky,  G.  1986. Fate in soil of a recombinant plasmid carrying a
        Drosophila gene.  Current Microbiology  (in press).

Devanas, M. A., Harsell, C., Wu, C., and Stotzky, G. 1986.  Plasmid transfer in
        Escherichia coli in sterile  and nonsterile soil.. Abstract, Annual Meeting of the
        American Society for Microbiology (in press).

Stotzky, G. and Devanas, M.  A.  1986. Fate and  potential ecologic effects of genetically
        engineered microbes in soil.  Abstract, International Congress of Soil Science
        (submitted).

-------
                                1986 ASM ANNUAL MEETING
                             Washington, D.C.   23-28 March 1986

                                    Official Abstract Form

                                (Read all instructions before typing)
             !   .(      ;  Plasmid  Transfer  in Escherichia coli in  Sterile    '
             ''.  •>"ll's "  ;  and Nonsterile Soil.   MONICA A. DEVANASl*.        j
             'CYNTHIA HARSELL1,  CYNTHIA  WU1, and G.  STOTZKY2,   Rutgers    !
              Univ., New Brunsvick, NJ1,  and NYU, NY, NY2                  |

             i      Strains of E.  coli [DUIOUO(pRR226), DU10^0(pDU202),
             • and PRCU8?, a lac+ C600] were introduced separately into
              sterile and nonsterile soil, with and  without nutrients  (5%
              Luria Broth).  The numbers of colony forming units of in-
             troduced  strains,  transconjugants, and indigenous soil mi-
             . crobes were determined on  nonselective and selective me-
              dia.  The survival of the  donor and recipient strains in
             . sterile soil was  reduced under low moisture content (1.6%;
             .the -33 kPa potential was  25%} and low nutrient levels,  (in-
             ' oculated  in saline), which apparently  limited the poten-
              tial for  conjugation as none was observed.  Plasmid trans-
              fer at a  frequency of 10    transconjugants/recipient cell
              was observed in sterile soils at 25% moisture when nutri-
              ents were added.   In nonsterile soil at 25% moisture and
              without nutrients,  competition with indigenous soil mi-
              crobes reduced the survival of the donors and recipients,
             . and no plasmid transfer was observed.   When nutrients were
             : added with the inoculum, there was a rapid growth of the
              introduced strains, during  the first 2k h, but no  plasmid
              transfer  was observed, and the numbers of both donors and
              recipients subsequently declined rapidly.
Instructions

   Indicate below the subject category number from the list on p. iv, check your poster or slide session preference, complete the
check list on the reverse side of this sheet, and sign your name in the space provided.
   Indicate category number from page iv

                                Category number

Poster/Slide Session Preference                             ,        ,

   Because of the flexibility in programming afforded by poster sessions, the Program Committee will attempt to schedule all
abstracts which (i) are considered by elected divisional officers to be of acceptable quality and (ii) conform to rules established by
the Program Committee. The decision of whether an abstract is scheduled in a slide or a poster session will be made by the elect-
ed Program Committee, which will be guided (but not bound) by the preference of the authors. Approximately 75% of the
abstracts will be scheduled in poster sessions. By submitting an abstract, the author agrees that the paper will be presented as
scheduled.                             ~           .                                     .

Please check one:    S Poster session preferred    D Slide session preferred   Q No preference

Please provide telephone number of signing author (201      )  932-8906	'
                                           Area code    "               •

                                              vii                       '

-------
INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR ORAL EXPOSURE OF AVIAN
  SPECIES TO MICROBIAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS
               M. D. Knittel
        Toxics and Pesticides Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
             Corvallis, Oregon

-------
                  INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR ORAL  EXPOSURE  OF  AVIAN
                    SPECIES TO MICROBIAL  PEST  CONTROL AGENTS

                                  INTRODUCTION
     Registration of Microbial Pest Control  Agents  (MPCAs)  under Subsection M
of the Fungicide Insectide Rodenticide Act  requires that the susceptibility of
nontarget species be tested.  Among the nontarget hosts  chosen for testing are
the avian species.  The suggested test birds are either  the Bobwhite quail or
the Mallard duck.  These avian species have  been chosen  largely because of the
history of use in chemical toxicity testing  and are adapted to laboratory
rearing.
     This document will outline proposed  test  methods for oral exposure of
birds to an MPCA and includes a summary of the observations of symptoms which
must be made during the test.
     Wild bird populations will be orally exposed to  MPCAs  by consuming
infested pests.  The classic serial dilution of the pathogen to produce an LD5Q
determination most likely will not be realized because the  MPCA is being tested
in a nontarget host.  For this reason the proposal  is to expose the test brids
to a single high dose, based on the field application rate  of the MPCA.  The
route chosen is oral inoculation.  In this manner the MPCA  is introduced
directly into the alimentary canal.  A large dose should provide every oppor-
tunity for the MPCA pathogen to establish an infection,  if  it is capable.

-------
Definitions of Terms Used in This Interim Protocol
Dorsal:  Located near or on back of an animal  or  one  of  its parts.
Histopathology:  A branch of pathology that  deals with tissue  changes associ-
     ated with disease.
Indigeneous disease:  Disease carried by the host and specific for the host.
     May be subclinical or in a carrier state.
LDso:  The dose of pathogen which is fatal to 50% of  the test  animals.
Maximum hazardous dose:  Doses of the MPCA should be  multiples of maximum
     amount of active ingredient expected to be available to nontarget species
     in the environment.  This amount can be based  on the per  acre application
     rate or amount of MPCA contained in the target host at the time of death.
Necropsy:  Autopsy, or examination of internal organs of the body to determine
     cause of death.
Nephelometry:  Measurement of numbers of particles  by amount of light scatter-
     ing.
Primary defense barriers:  Outer dermal or mucous membranes of animal that  act
     as a mechanical barrier to infection.
Secondary defense barriers:  Internal body mechanism  against infection such as
     phagocytic cells and nonspecific immune responses.
Target host:  The host from which the MPCA was isolated  and the one intended
     for control.
Trituration:  Grinding or crush as in a mortor with a pestle or in a tissue
     homogenerator.
Ventral:  On or belonging to lower or anterior surface of an animal, side
     opposite the back.
Virulence:  Disease-producing power of a microorganism.

-------
Test Procedures
A.   Summary of Test:  The test is designed  to  determine  if the MPCA is infec-
     tive and/or pathogenic to avian species.   Because the MPCA is pathogenic
     for hosts phylogenetically far removed  from the test species, exposure is
     by a large dose administered by the direct oral route.  The test species
     is either Bobwhite quail  or the Mallard duck.  These two species were
     chosen because colonies have been established  for chemical
     toxicity research and are adapted to laboratory rearing.
          A single large dose is administered by oral gavage into the crop or
     preventriculus and the birds observed for  death or illness due to infec-
     tion.  If death or illness is observed, then a serial dilution of the MPCA
     is made and several groups of birds are orally inoculated to establish an
     LD5o.  If death or illness is not observed, birds are sacrificed at the
     end of observation period and a necropsy performed and tissues taken for
     histopathology and isolation of the test MPCA.

B.   Test Species:  Either Bobwhite quail or Mallard duck are suitable for the
     test.  Both have been used for testing  toxicity of chemicals and, there-
     fore, an extensive knowledge of laboratory rearing is available.
          An inhouse colony of known pedigeree  and  indigeneous disease history
     will be established.  If test birds are purchased from a supplier, a
     disease free certification will be required.  Birds  for a single test will
     be of the same age, randomly selected,  and placed in cages.  Numbers of
     birds for each test should consist of a minimum of 10 for each dilution of
     the MPCA plus a control group.
     1.   Identification:  Each bird will be identified with a leg band number.

-------
     2.   Husbandry:   Current acceptable  practices  of good husbandry will be
          followed at all  times (Case  and Robel,  1974).
     3.   Temperature:  Room temperature  should be  maintained at 25°C +_ 2°C.
     4.   Relative Humidity:   Relative humidity of  30 to 80 percent will be
          maintained  during study.   Adequate ventilation will be by use of
          exhaust fans.
     5.   Feed:   All  birds will be  provided  a ration suitable for rearing or
          maintaining study species.  The feed will be free of any antibiotic
          medication  prior to and during  study.   Ration should be provided ad
          libitum.  Feed consumption during  the study will be recorded.
     6.   Water:  Water will  be available ad libitum during rearing and study.
          Water will  be  changed as  often  as  required to provide potable water.
          During study of MPCA infection  the amount of water used will be
          recorded.
     7.   Photoperiod:  Light and dark period should be maintained at 12 h
          light 12 h  dark.
     8.   Age:  Birds for test will  be at least 16  weeks old at the start of
          the experiment.

C.   Cages:  Wire cages  30 x 24 x 10"  are used to house the experimental quail.
     The cages should have wire floors to allow droppings to pass through to a
     catch pan beneath.   Cages for  Mallard ducks  should be 27.5 x 39.25 x 9.5
     inches for ducklings 14 days old  and older.  Adult duck require 5.4 square
     feet per bird which would be a cage  about 7  times the size used for the
     young ducklings  (192 x 276 x 66 inches).

-------
D.   Number of Birds In Treatment  Groups:   The  number  of  test  birds per treat-
     ment group should be no less  than 10  with  the  same number in each control
     group.  However, if the number of birds  is increased the  results become
     more statistically significant.  The  proposed  acute  exposure, maximum
     hazardous dose, require that  a group  of  10 birds  inoculated orally with a
     number of the MPCA pathogen equivalent to  some multiple of the per acre
     application rate or amount contained  in  target host  at death.  A control
     group would receive an equivalent inoculum which  has been inactivated with
     heat (autoclaving, 15 Ibs/in2 248°F for  15 minutes).

E.   Preparation and quantification of inoculum
     Bacteria:  Bacterial MPCAs are grown  in  a  liquid  medium that best supports
     growth, i.e., the medium for  growth of Bacillus thuringiensis  (Faust and
     Traverse, 1981).  Temperature and aeration during incubation should  be
     optimum for the bacterium under study to provide  sufficient cell numbers
     at the end of the incubation  time. The  incubation time should also  be
     optimum for the particular species of bacterium being studied.
          The bacterial cells should be removed from the  culture medium by
     centrifugation at 10,000 RPM, 10 minutes at 4°C,  and washed by resuspen-
     sion and sedimentation with phosphate buffered saline at  least twice.   The
     inculum size should be large  and correspond to a  multiple of the per acre
     application rate or that found in the target host at the  time  of death.
     Bacterial cell numbers should be adjusted  to the  above  level either  by
     standard bacterial plate count or by  nephelometry.

     Fungi:  Culture Growth and Quantisation:  Growth  of  fungi culture for
     inoculation can follow that outline above  for bacteria  using appropriate
                                       5

-------
medium, temperature, and aeration to obtain sufficient  growth  (Lewis e*
al., 1958).  If the spore is the infective stage,  standardization will be
by microscopic enumeration in a hemocytometer or by  plate  count of
inoculum on appropriate medium.  If the mycelium is  the infective stage,
then the inoculum should be quantitated by the dry weight  of the harvested
and washed mycelium.

Virus:  The inoculum for virus infectivity studies should  be grown  in cell
culture if such a system is available.  If not, the  inoculum is prepared
from host tissue by trituration and purified from cell  debris  by centrifu-
gation.  Bacterial  contamination from the host may present problems upon
inoculation into the test birds and should be suppressed by the use of
antibiotics such as streptomycin and penicillin.
     If the virus is occluded, separate inoccula of  occluded and non-
occlued virus should be made and used in separate infectivity  studies.
     Quantification of the virus inoculum can be based  either  on tissue
culture infective doses (TCIDso), plaque assay, or lethal  dose in the
target host (Groner et^ a_L, 1984).

Protozoan:  The inoculum should be prepared from pure culture  if possible.
In this way, extraneous contaminating microorganisms can be eliminated or
minimized.  If it must be prepared from infected host,  it  should be
prepared in such a manner as to eliminate contaminating microorganisms.
This may be accomplished by repeated centrifugation  followed by resuspen-
sion and incubation of the inoculum with antibiotics to suppress or
eliminate contaminating microorganisms.

-------
          Quantification of inoculum can be by  direct microscopic count in a
     hemocytometer, or by 1059 determination in a  susceptible host  (Kudo,
     1966).

F.   Oral Inoculation:  The dose of MPCA will  be administered by oral  gavage
     with a syringe fitted with a stainless steel  canula.   Dose will be placed
     into crop or preventriculus.

G.   Post Inoculation Observation:
     1.   Time:  The inoculated birds should be observed daily for  signs  of
          illness and any mortalities recorded. The  length of observation
          period should be no less than 30 days.
     2.   Food and Water:  Food and water should be provided ad lib.   A daily
          measurement of the amount of food and water consumed during  the
          observation period should be made.  Signs of  illness can  be  reflected
          in loss of appetite and increase in water consumption.  Recovery from
          the illness will be seen in a recovery of appetite and drop  in  water
          consumption.
     3.   Signs:  The inoculated birds should be observed daily for signs of
          illness.  Among general symptoms of disease are the following:
          labored breathing, ruffled feathers,  drooping wings, listlessness,
          head lowered, eyes closed, increased water  consumption, mucous
          discharge from mouth, diarrhea, loss  of  weight, coughing, gasping,
          respiratory difficulty, and weakness. The  control group  should also
          be observed for similar signs and the two groups compared.

-------
H.   Necropsy:   At the end of the observation  period,  all  remaining birds
     should be sacrificed and a  necropsy  performed.  The internal organs should
     be examined for any overt lesions.   Samples  of  tissue should be removed
     for attempt to isolate the  MPCA and  for histopathological preparation and
     examination.

I.   Bioassay of Inoculum:  It is recommended  that the experimental inoculum be
     assayed in the target host  at the same time  as  it is  inoculated into the
     birds.  This will assure that the inoculum has  not lost  any virulence due
     to preparation.

J.   Reporting:  The sponsor should submit  to  the USEPA all data developed by
     the test that are suggestive or predictive of the infectivity of the MPCA
     for avian species.  Included are any behavioral changes  during the
     observation period, gross lesion of  any internal  organs,  results of
     attempts to reisolate the MPCA from  sampled  organs, and  results of the
     histopathologic examination of tissues.  The reporting should follow the
     requirements set out in Part 792 of  the "Good Laboratory  Practice
     Standards" and should also  include the following:
     1.   The name of the test,  sponsor,  testing  laboratory,  study director,
          principle investigator and dates  of  testing.
     2.   A detailed description of the test MPCA, such as type  (virus,
          bacteria, etc.), source of inoculum  (i.e., pure  culture, infected
          host, etc.), preparation of inoculum, and  standardization of the
          dose.  Description should also  include  the type  of  resuspension fluid
          and its composition.
                                       8

-------
3.   Detailed information about species  of  birds  used  in the test, their
     scientific name, source of test  birds  (supplier or in-house colony),
     and history of any indigenous disease.   The  sponsor should also
     include age of test subjects, ambient  conditions, i.e., temperature,
     room lighting level, and photoperiod.
4.   Description of the test cages, dimensions, number of test birds per
     cage, number of replicates per dilution of MPCA.
5.   Number of MPCAs dosed into each  bird and method of verification,
     microscopic count, plate count,  or  tissue culture infective doses.
6.   The percentage of test birds affected  by treatment at  each observa-
     tion period must be recorded.
7.   Results of bioassay of inoculum in  the target host, time  of first
     mortalities, time of last mortalities,  and LD50 determination with
     statistical treatment must be required.
8.   Any deviation from this test guidelines and  anything unusual about
     the test, e.g., temperature fluctuations, disease problems in flock,
     etc. must be reported.

-------
                                   References
Surges, H. D., G. Croizer,  and J.  Huber.   1980.  A  review of safety tests on
     baculovi ruses.  Entomophaga £5_,  329-340.
Case, R. M., and R. J. Robel.   1974.   Bioenergetics of the bobwhite.  J. Wild.
     Manage. 38, 638-652.
Faust, R. M., and R. S. Travers.   1981.   Occurrence of resistance to neomycin
     and kanamycin in Bacillus popilliae  and certain senotypes of Bacillus
     thuringiensis:  Mutation  potential in sensitive strains.  J. Invert. Path.
     34, 113-116.
Groner, A., R. R. Granados, and J. P. Burand.   1984.   Interaction of Autographa
     californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus with two nonpermissive cell lines.
     Invervirol. 2U 203-209.
Kudo, R. R.  1966.  Protozoology.   Chapter 43.  pp. 1057-1088.  Charles C.
     Thomas Publisher.  Springfield,  Illinois.  5th ed.
Lewis, G. M., M. E. Hopper, J. W.  Wilson, and 0. A. Plunkett.  1958.  Introduc-
     tion to medical mycology. Year  Book Publishers,  Inc.  Chicago, Illinois.
     pp. 382-418.  4th ed.
                                      10

-------
INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR INTRAVENEOUS EXPOSURE OF AVIAN
      SPECIES TO MICROBIAL PEST CONTROL  AGENTS
                   M. D. Knittel
            Toxics and Pesticides Branch
    Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory
                 Corvallis,  Oregon

-------
              INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR INTRAVENEOUS  EXPOSURE OF AVIAN
                    SPECIES TO MICROBIAL  PEST  CONTROL AGENTS

                                  INTRODUCTION
     Registration of Microbial Pest Control  Agents  (MPCAs) under Subsection M
of the Fungicide Insectide Rodenticide Act  requires  that the susceptibility of
nontarget species be tested.  The avian species  are  among the nontarget hosts
chosen for testing.  The suggested test species  is  either the Bobwhite quail or
the Mallard duck.  These avian species have  been chosen largely because of
their history of use in chemical  toxicity testing and their adaptability to
laboratory rearing.
     This document will outline proposed  methods of  exposing the test birds to
the MPCA, route of inoculation, and observation  of  symptoms during the test.
     Because the MPCAs are microbial pathogens,  but  being tested in nontarget
species, effects may be limited to symptoms  other than overt mortality.  The
classic serial dilution of the pathogen to  produce  an LD50 determination will
probably not be possible.  For this reason,  the  experiments will expose the
test birds to a high dosage of the MPCA by  the most  direct route:  intravenous
inoculation.  This introduces the MPCA directly  into the blood stream, bypass-
ing the primary barriers of body defenses and  allows it access to the internal
organs.  A large dose would overwhelm the secondary  body defense mechanisms,
providing an opportunity to establish an  infection,  if it is pathogenic to the
avian species.

-------
Definitions of Terms Used in This Interim Protocol
Dorsal:  Located near or on back of an animal  or  one  of  its  parts.
Histopathology:  A branch of pathology that deals with tissue  changes associ-
     ated with disease.
Indigeneous disease:  Disease carried by the host and specific for the host.
     May be subclinical or in a carrier state.
Intravenous:  Located within or going into the veins.
LD50:  The dose of pathogen which is fatal to 50% of  the test  animals.
Maximum hazardous dose:  Doses of the MPCA should be  multiples of maximum
     amount of the per acre field active ingredient expected to be available to
     the nontarget species in the environment. This  amount  can be based on the
     per acre application rate or amount of MPCA  contained in  a target host at
     time of death.
Necropsy:  Autopsy, or examination of internal organs of the body to determine
     cause of death.
Nephelometry:  Measurement of numbers of particles  by amount of light scatter-
     ing.
Primary defense barriers:  Outer dermal or mucous membranes  of animal that act
     as a mechanical barrier to infection.
Secondary defense barriers:  Internal body mechanism  active  against infection
     such as phagocytic cells and nonspecific immune  responses.
Target host:  The host from which the MPCA was isolated  and  the one intended
     for control.
Trituration:  Grinding or crushing as in a mortor with a pestle or in a tissue
     homogenator.
Ventral:  On or belonging to lower or anterior surface of  an animal, side
     opposite the back.

-------
Virulence:  Disease-producing power of  a  microorganism.

Test Procedures
A.   Summary of Test:   The test is  designed  to  determine if the MPCA is infec-
     tive and/or pathogenic to avian species.   Because the MPCA is pathogenic
     for hosts phylogenetically far removed  from the test species, exposure
     will be by a large (maximum)  dose  administered by a direct route such as
     intravenous (I.V.).  The test  species is either Bobwhite quail or the
     Mallard duck.  These two species were chosen  because colonies have been
     established for chemical  toxicity  research and they are adapted to labora-
     tory rearing.
          A single large dose is injected I.V.  into the wing vein and the birds
     observed for death or illness  due  to infection.   If death or illness is
     observed, then a serial dilution of  the MPCA  is made and several groups of
     birds are injected I.V. to establish an LD5Q.  If death or illness is not
     observed, birds are sacrificed at  the end  of  the observation period, a
     necropsy performed, and tissues taken for  histopathology and isolation of
     the test MPCA.

B.   Test Species:  Either Bobwhite quail or Mallard duck are suitable for the
     test.  Since both have been used for testing  toxicity of chemicals, an
     extensive knowledge of laboratory  rearing  exists.
          An inhouse colony of known pedigree and  indigenous disease history
     will be established.  If test  birds  are purchased from a supplier, a
     disease free certification will be required.  Birds for a single test will
     be of the same age, randomly selected,  and placed in cages.  Numbers of

-------
     birds for each test should consist of a minimum  of  10  for each dilution of
     the MPCA plus a control  group.
     1.   Identification;  Each bird will  be identified  with  leg  band number.
     2.   Husbandry:  Current acceptable practices  of good  husbandry will be
          followed at all times (Case and Robel,  1974).
     3.   Temperature:  Room temperature should  be  maintained at  25°C, +_ 2°C.
     4.   Relative Humidity;   Relative humidity  of  30 to 80 percent will be
          maintained during study.   Adequate ventilation will be  assured by use
          of exhaust fans.
     5.   Feed:  All birds will be  provided a ration  suitable for rearing or
          maintaining study species.  The feed will be free of any antibiotic
          medication prior to and during the study.  Rations  should be provided
          ad libitum.  Feed consumption during the  study will be  recorded.
     6.   Water:  Water will  be available ad libitum  during rearing and  study.
          Water will be changed as  often as required  to  provide potable  water.
          During study of MPCA infection the amount of water  used will be
          recorded.
     7.   Photoperiod:  Light and dark period will  be maintained  at 12 h light
          12 h dark.
     8.   Age:  Birds for test will  be at least  16  weeks old  at the start of
          the experiment.

C.   Cages:   Wire cages 30 x 24 x 10" are used to house  the experimental quail.
     The cages should have wire floors to allow  droppings to  pass through to a
     catch pan beneath.  Cages for  Mallard ducks should  be  27.5 x 39.25  x 9.5
     inches  for ducklings 14 days old.  Adult ducks require 5.4 square feet per

-------
     bird which would be a cage about  7  times the size used for the young
     ducklings (192 x 276 x 66 inches).

D.   Number of Birds in Treatment  Groups:   The  number of test  birds per treat-
     ment group should be no less  than 10,  with the  same number in each control
     group.  However, a larger number  of birds  will  increase the statistical
     significance of the results.   The proposed acute exposure, maximum
     hazardous dose, requires that a group  of 10 birds be  injected intraven-
     ously with a number of the MPCA pathogen equivalent to 10 to 100 times the
     per acre rate applied to a 70 kg  man.   A control group would receive an
     equivalent inoculum which has been  inactivated  with heat  (autoclaving, 15
     Ibs/in2 248°F for 15 minutes).

E.   Preparation and Quantification of Inoculum
     Bacteria:  Bacterial MPCAs are grown in a  liquid medium that best supports
     growth, i.e., the medium for  growth of Bacillus thuringiensis (Faust and
     Traverse, 1981).  Temperature and aeration during incubation should be
     optimum for the bacterium under study  to provide sufficient cell numbers
     at the end of the incubation  time.   The incubation time should also be
     optimum for the particular species  of  bacterium being studied.
          The bacterial cells should be  removed from the culture medium by
     centrifugation at 10,000 RPM, 10  minutes at 4°C, and  washed by resuspen-
     sion and sedimentation with phosphate  buffered  saline at  least twice.  The
     inoculum size should be large and correspond to a multiple of the per acre
     application dose or amount contained in host at death.  Bacterial cell
     numbers should be adjusted to the above level either  by standard bacterial
     plate count or by nephelometry.

-------
Fungi:  Culture Growth and Quantification:   Growth  of  fungi  for  inocula-
tion can follow that outlined above for bacteria  using appropriate medium,
temperature, and aeration to obtain sufficient  growth  (Lewis et  al.,
1958).  If the spore is the infective stage, standardization will be by
microscopic enumeration in a hemocytometer  or by  plate count of  inoculum
on appropriate medium.  If the mycelium is  the  infective  stage,  then the
inoculum should be quantitated by the dry weight  of the harvested and
washed mycelium.

Virus:  The inoculum for virus infectivity  studies  should be grown  in  cell
culture if such a system is available.  If  not, the inoculum is  prepared
from host tissue by trituration and purified from cell debris by centrifu-
gation.  Bacterial contamination from the host  may  present problems upon
inoculation into the test birds and should  be suppressed  by the  use of
antibiotics such as streptomycin and penicillin.
     If the virus is occluded, separate inoccula  of occluded and non-
occlued virus should be made, and used in separate  infectivity studies.
     Quantification of the virus inoculum can be  based either on tissue
culture infective doses (TCID5o), plaque assay, or  lethal  dose in the
target host (Groner e£ _al_., 1984).

Protozoan:  If the protozoan can be cultured, the inoculum should be
prepared in such a manner.  If, however, it must  be prepared from infected
host, it should be prepared in such a manner as to  eliminate contaminating
microorganisms.  This may be accomplished by repeated  centrifugation
followed by resuspension and incubation of  the inoculum with antibiotics
to suppress or eliminate contaminating microorganisms.
                                  6

-------
          Quantification of inoculum can be  by  direct microscopic count in a
     hemocytometer, or by LD50 determination  in a  susceptible host (Kudo,
     1966).

F.   Intravenous Injection:  The ventral  wing vein of the  bird is the most
     convenient for injection.  The vein is  exposed by  plucking the feathers
     from the underside of the wing.  The vein  lies in  a depression between the
     biceps brachial and tricepts humerials  muscles.  The  vein becomes more
     visable if the skin surface is wetted with 70% alcohol.  Both wings are
     extended dorsally and gripped together  firmly with one hand in the area of
     the wing web.  Surface of the skin  over the vein is sterilized with
     tincture of iodine (20 grams iodine and 24 grams potassium iodide per 1000
     mis of distilled water).  A needle  (3/4" 20 ga) is inserted into the vein
     in opposite direction of the blood  flow.  The plunger of the syringe is
     slowly depressed to expel 1 the inoculum and the needle withdrawn.  A
     cotton ball or gauze square soaked  with  tincture of iodine is held on the
     puncture side until bleeding stops  (Zandler,  1983).

G.   Post Inoculation Observation:
     1.   Time:  The inoculated birds should be observed daily for signs of
          illness and any mortalities recorded. The length of observation
          period should be no less than  30 days.
     2.   Food and Water:  Food and water should be provided ad lib.  A daily
          measurement of the amount of food  and water consumed during the
          observation period should be made.  Sign of illness are reflected in
          loss of appetite and thirst.  Recovery from the  illness will be seen
          in a recovery of appetite and  drop in water consumption.
                                      7

-------
     3.   Signs:  The inoculated birds  should be  observed  daily for signs of
          illness.  Among general  symptoms  of disease  are  the following:
          labored breathing, ruffled feathers,  drooping wings, listlessness,
          head lowered, eyes closed, increased water consumption, mucous
          discharge from mouth,  diarrhea,  loss  of weight,  coughing, gasping,
          respiratory difficulty,  and weakness.  The control group should also
          be observed and the two  groups compared.

H.   Necropsy:  At the end of the  observation period all of the birds should be
     sacrificed and a necropsy performed.   The internal organs should be
     examined for any overt lesions.  Samples of  tissue should be removed for
     attempts to isolate the MPCA and for  histopathological preparation and
     examination.

I.   Bioassay of Inoculum:  It is  recommended that the experimental inoculum be
     assayed in the target host  at the  same time  as it is  inoculated into the
     birds.  This will assure that the  inoculum has not lost any virulence due
     to preparation.

J.   Reporting:  The sponsor should submit  to the USEPA all data developed by
     the test that are suggestive  or predictive of the infectivity of the MPCA
     for avian species.  Included  are to any behavioral changes during the
     observation period, gross lesions  on  any internal organs, results of
     attempts to reisolate the MPCA from sampled  organs, and results of the
     histopathologic examination of tissues.  The reporting should follow the
     requirements set out in Part  792 of the "Good Laboratory Practice
     Standards" and should also include the following:
                                       8

-------
1.   The name of the test,  sponsor,  testing  laboratory, study director,
     principle investigator and dates  of  testing.
2.   A detailed description of the test MPCA,  such  as type  (virus,
     bacteria, etc.), source of inoculum  (i.e.,  pure culture, infected
     host, etc.), preparation of inoculum, and standardization of the
     dose.  Description should also  include  the  type of resuspension fluid
     and its composition.
3.   Detailed information about species of birds used in the test, their
     scientific name, source of test birds  (supplier or in-house colony),
     and history of any indigenous disease.  The sponsor should also
     include age of test subjects, ambient conditions, i.e., temperature,
     room lighting level, and photoperiod.
4.   Description of the test cages,  dimensions,  number of test birds per
     cage, number of replicates per  dilution of  MPCA.
5.   Number of MPCAs injected into each bird and method of  verification,
     microscopic count, plate count, or tissue culture infective doses
     must be indicated.
6.   The percentage of test birds affected by  treatment at  each observa-
     tion period must be recorded.
7.   Results of bioassay of inoculum in the  target  host, time of first
     mortalities, time of last mortalities,  and  1050 determination with
     statistical treatment  must be provided.
8.   Any deviation from this test guidelines and anything unusual about
     the test, e.g., temperature fluctuations, disease problems in flock,
     etc. must be reported.

-------
                                   References
Surges, H. D., G. Croizer,  and J.  Huber.   1980.  A  review of safety tests on
     baculoviruses.  Entomophaga £5,  329-340.
Case, R. M., and R. J.  Robel.   1974.   Bioenergetics of the bobwhite.  J. Wild.
     Manage. 38, 368-652.
Faust, R. M.,  and R. S. Travers.   1981.   Occurrence of resistance to neomycin
     and kanamycin in Bacillus popilliae  and certain senotypes of Bacillus
     thuringiensis:  Mutation  potential in sensitive strains.  J. Invert. Path.
     34, 113-116.
Groner, A., R. R. Granados, and J. P. Burand.  1984.  Interaction of Autographa
     californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus with two nonpermissive cell lines.
     Invervirol. _21_t 203-209.
Kudo, R. R.  1966.  Protozoology.   Chapter 43.  pp. 1057-1088.  Charles C.
     Thomas, Publisher.  Springfield, Illinois.  5th ed.
Lewis, G. M.,  M. E. Hopper, J. W.  Wilson, and 0. A. Plunkett.  1958.   Introduc-
     tion to medical mycology. Year  Book Publishers, Inc.  Chicago, Illinois.
     pp. 382-418.  4th  ed.
Zandler, D. V.  1983.  Diseases of Poultry. Ed by  M. S. Hofstad, B. W. Calnek,
     C. F. Humbolt, W.  M. Reid, and H. W. Yoder, Jr.  8th ed.  Iowa State
     University Press,  Ames, IA.   p.  30.
                                       10

-------
ASSESSMENT OF METHODS FOR THE
DETECTION, IDENTIFICATION, AND
ENUMERATION OF GENETICALLY-ENGINEERED
      BACTERIA IN SOIL
         ITEM 6940A
        FEBRUARY,  1986

-------
        Assessment of Methods for the Detection, Identification,  and



           Enumeration of Genetically-Engineered Bacteria in Soil




                               PETER G. HARTEL




    Department of Agronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602*










INTRODUCTION	  2




     The nature of soil and rhizosphere	  3




     Preliminary considerations to soil and rhizosphere methods	  3




METHODS OF ENUMERATION	  5




     Fluorescent antibody	  5




     Plate counts with selective agents	  8




     Most-probable-number	10




     DNA probes	11




COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ENUMERATION	14




METHODS OF DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION	17




     Phage typing	17




     Intrinsic antibiotic resistance	17




     Other serological methods	18



CONCLUSION	18




LITERATURE CITED	20
* This report represents the opinion of the author.  It carries no official



endorsement by the University of Georgia.

-------
                                INTRODUCTION




     Recent interest in the deliberate or inadvertent release of genetically-




engineered microorganisms to the environment (2) raises questions about the




ability to detect, identify, and enumerate these microorganisms in order to




ascertain their growth, survival, and potential ecological effects.  This



report is an assessment of the methods for the detection, identification, and




enumeration of genetically-engineered bacteria in soil.  Because only a few




papers involve genetically-engineered bacteria in soil, general methods for




the study of soil bacteria are included here as well.  Methods of enumeration




are considered first because these methods are the most developed and likely




to prove the most useful.  Methods of detection and identification are




considered in a later section.  Detection is distinguished here from




identification because in some of the discussed methods, bacteria can be




detected without identification.  Methods involving total microbial community




studies, such as biomass and activity measurements, which do not differentiate




one bacterium from another are not considered.  This is a realization that the




primary need in the release of genetically-engineered bacteria into soil is




to study a particular bacterial strain and not the microbial community at



large.




     Methods of enumeration in soil generally fall into two categories:



direct and indirect.  Direct methods identify bacteria by some form of




microscopy (visible light, scanning electron, transmission electron,




epifluorescence, fluorescent antibody), whereas indirect methods employ some




form of viable counting procedure (dilution plate counts with or without




selective agents, most-probable-number analysis).  DNA probe methods are not




yet sufficiently evolved and currently both direct and indirect methods are in




use.  Of the direct methods, only the fluorescent antibody and DNA probes can

-------
differentiate one bacterium from another, so these are the only direct methods


considered.  This paper will seek to identify advantages and disadvantages of
                                                                   •

each method before finally comparing all the methods.



                     The nature of soil and rhizosphere          r~



     Soil is probably the most complex environment in which bacteria can


exist.  This is because soil is dominated by a solid phase of different-sized


particles surrounded by liquid and gas phases which fluctuate greatly in time


and space (85).  Consequently the diversity, activity, and numbers of bacteria


in soil also fluctuate greatly in time and space.  Thus, it must be understood


that any method of detection, identification, and enumeration of bacteria in


soil has the capacity to represent but a small fraction of the soil's


heterogeneity.


     The rhizosphere, the zone of microbial stimulation under the influence of


plant roots, is a natural subset of the soil habitat.  It is important because


1) numbers of bacteria are higher here than in the surrounding soil (34) as a


consequence of chemically heterogeneous organic materials released in root


exudates (28), and 2) the rhizosphere presents some distinct problems for the


detection, identification, and enumeration of bacteria.  For example, bacteria


may be present under a mucilaginous sheath on the root surface (48, 75) or


invade and colonize root cortical tissue (24).  It is still unknown whether


rhizosphere populations of bacteria are best quantified in terms of surface


area or on a root weight basis.  These and other problems have led some authors


to state that a precise determination of bacteria in the rhizosphere is not


yet possible (35).



         Preliminary considerations to soil and rhizosphere methods


     Regardless of the method use to detect, identify, or enumerate soil


bacteria, many important preliminary steps in the proper handling of the soil

-------
must be considered.  First, in the case of sieved soil, a 2-mm sieve should be

used because it conforms with the arbitrary upper size limit used in soil
                                                                   •
analyses (13).  It is important to mix this soil thoroughly.  James and

Sutherland (47) found significant differences between aliquot samples from a


supposedly well-mixed sieved soil.  If a soil is not sieved, the soil samples

should be as homogenous as possible with as much replication as possible to

reduce sampling error (90).  Second, it is impossible to store soil samples


longer than a few hours without quantitative and qualitative changes occurring

within the microflora (50), so soil samples should be processed as quickly as

possible.  This is particularly important in avoiding changes of soil water

potential.  Third, when soil is suspended in a diluent, it is important to

standardize this procedure, because different cell aggregates are not dispersed


or destroyed with equal ease (49).  Finally, in the case of inoculated non-

sterile soils, inoculation densities for determining bacterial growth or

survival should be reasonable.  The author strongly supports the concept of a

soil threshold for bacterial numbers (20).  For example, protozoan predation
                                                           o
may be significant at bacterial inoculation densities of 10  cells per g of


soil, but not at densities of 10  cells per g of soil (40).  Thus, an environ-

mental effect is observed at high bacterial inoculation densities that would

not normally occur if the densities were more reasonable.

     In the case of rhizosphere, what is or is not rhizosphere soil must be


carefully defined because definitions of what constitutes rhizosphere soil

vary.  Generally rhizosphere soil is defined as soil still adhering to the


roots after removal of the plant from the soil (60).  Although it is still

difficult to determine the amount of this rhizosphere soil, the dry weight of


the soil can be estimated  (41).

-------
                           METHODS OF ENUMERATION

                            Fluorescent Antibody
                                                                   *
     The fluorescent antibody (FA) technique is a method in which fluorescent

markers are attached to the antibody proteins for visualizing a antigen-antibody

reaction.  Excellent extensive reviews of the theory and principles of this

technique already exist (37, 54).  In the direct FA technique, the specific

antibody against the bacterium of interest is labelled, whereas in the indirect

method, the specific antibody against the bacterium of interest is unlabelled

and a second labelled antibody against the first antibody is then required to

visualize the antigen-antibody reaction.  The direct technique has an advantage

of simplicity because only one antibody reagent is involved, whereas the

indirect technique has an advantage of a brighter fluorescent label (54).

     The FA technique has three primary advantages:

1) The technique can identify a bacterium that is otherwise difficult to work

with or to isolate.  An example is the extensive work in soil (32) and in

rhizosphere (73) with the chemoautotrophic nitrifier Nitrobacter which until

the advent of immunofluorescent methods was usually enumerated by a most-

probable-number method (3).

2) The technique is useful for showing spatial relationships, particularly in

rhizosphere where little is known about the soil's micro- and macrostructure

(51).

3) Assuming antisera are available, the technique is fast.

     The disadvantages of the FA technique are extensively reviewed elsewhere

(12, 80) and are summarized below:

1) The specificity of the FA reaction must be studied for each bacterium of

interest.  The number of strains or species necessary to satisfy this requirement

varies with each experiment, depending on the experimental objectives, the

-------
specificity pattern that emerges, and the information already known about the


serology of the organism.  Monoclonal antibodies will be useful in offering


greater specifity for the FA technique in the future, but as yet ttiey have


not been extensively employed for soil.


2) Although the use of rhodamine gelatin as a primary stain (10) lias effectively


eliminated non-specific staining of soil particles and organic matter, and the


use of a combination irgalan black (45) or india ink and rhodamine gelatin


prestaining has effectively eliminated problems with membrane filter auto-,


fluorescence, plant autofluorescence continues to be a problem for some


rhizosphere studies.  For example, Diem et al. (22) were unable to eliminate


the autofluorescence of rice roots, whereas Schank et al. (79) were more


fortunate in that autofluorescence was prominent in the stelar portion of a


grass root, but not in the mucigel area where most of the bacteria were located.


3) The FA technique cannot differentiate between living and dead cells as both


fluoresce brightly and specifically.  One alternative is to simultaneously


measure metabolically active bacteria by autoradiography (32) or to use a


tetrazolium dye which reduces to optically-dense, dark red spots in actively


respiring bacteria (93).  The length of time that a nonviable cell fluoresces


varies with the cell and the environment.  Nonviable cells generally fragment


and clear within a 1-2 week period (11), but this would not be the case in


soils with low water potential.


4) The practical lower limit of detectability of the FA technique is only

              O   /
fair, about 10 -10  cells per g of soil (Table 1).  In an effort to improve


the original Breed slide method  (10 |JL of a 1:10 soil dilution spread on 1.0

  2                                                           6
cm  slide surface) which requires a bacterial population of 10  cells per g of


soil to see one antigen cell per microscope field and where only a limited


amount of soil or soil dilution could be observed before the antigen of interest

-------
Table 1.  Lowest bacterial density observed in some selected papers using the FA

          technique.


Organism                     Soil (S) or     Lowest density reported,    Reference
                           Rhizosphere (R)   log no. cells/g of soil
Rhizobium japonicum
Rhizobium japonicum
Rhizobium japonicum
Rhizobium japonicum
Rhizobium japonicum
Beijerinckia sp.
chickpea Rhizobium
Nitrobacter spp.
Nitrobacter winogradskyi
Nitrobacter sp.
Escherichia coli
S
S
S
R
R
S
S
S
S
R
S
-3.54
4.71
-3.54
3.61
3.15
5.08
-3.00
3.52
4.38
3.95
4.57
20
29
88
80
74
21
55
33
72
73
81

-------
was obscured, Schmidt (81) developed a method to desorb the bacteria from the

soil particles with a surfactant, separate the bacteria from soil colloid, and
                                                                   *
collect the bacteria on membrane filters.  Although subsequent development of

simple soil blending-centrifugation procedures (5, 6, 30, 91) and use of

different diluents (6, 55, 70) have improved bacterial recovery from soil, the

results still vary greatly with soil texture and bacterial strains.




                     Plate counts with selective agents


     Before considering dilution plate counts with selective agents, it is

important to consider the plate count method in general because the latter

provides the foundation on which the former exists.  The method in general has

the advantages of being inexpensive and easy to perform.  But despite appear-

ances, the method is subject to large experimental errors and it is not easy

to evaluate the results unless the technique is given the greatest care (50).

For example, certain correctable errors need to be taken into consideration.

These errors are 1) accounting for the autoclave loss of the amount of diluent,

and 2) avoiding long settling times between dilutions that can significantly

decrease counts (46).

     The disadvantages of this method are extensively reviewed elsewhere (46,

49) and are summarized below:

1) Plate counts do not mimic the natural environment or show spatial relation-

ships of the soil and bacteria in vivo.  Although plate counts were initially

criticized because most soil bacteria are short coccoid rods, a morphology

that was not necessarily shared by the bacteria observed on soil dilution

plates (18), it now seems reasonable that this is a response to starvation

(56).  For example, Rhizobium japonicum are known to lose their bacillus-like

shape and acquire a coccoid-like form in soil (20).

-------
2) The method needs greater replication to achieve the same precision as the




fluorescent antibody technique.




3) A proportional decrease in the number of colonies on a plate is never




obtained in a soil dilution series (63).  In a soil diluted 1:10,  the number




of colonies on a plate usually decreases only in a ratio of 1:5. rThis is



primarily because of adsorption of bacteria to the inner walls of  the pipettes.




Furthermore, this proportional decrease is not linear because of increasing




dispersion of the suspension with increasing dilution (49).




4) For spread plates, bacteria can adhere to the spreader when spreading the




inoculum over the agar surface; for pour plates, colonies may coalesce if too




close together making counting difficult, or the heat from the molten agar




during pouring could cause lower counts.




5) Plate counts are difficult to standardize.  Unless plate counts are performed




on the same soil at the same time under the same strict standardized conditions,




the results will show significant differences among different laboratories




(27).




6) As mentioned in the Introduction, the presence of mucigel layers in the




rhizosphere or bacterial invasion of the endorhizosphere may cause under-




estimation of bacterial counts in these type of studies.  For example, vigorous




washing of Paspalum notatum removed little nitrogenase activity associated




with Azotobacter paspali of the roots (23).




     The degree of selectivity of the plate counts is seldom sufficient to allow




enumeration of any bacterium of interest in the presence of closely related




types (71).  To overcome this, inhibitors such as antibiotics, dyes, or other




selective compounds are added to the plate count medium and natural mutants of




the wild-type bacterium are selected that are resistant to that selective




compound.  Thus, the method allows greater selectivity with a concomitant

-------
                                                                            10
increase in the ability to detect lower numbers of the bacterium of interest.




Another minor advantage is that nothing needs to be sterilized (17).  This




method has widespread use and more recently has been proposed as a "technique



for isolating bacteria of potential use in genetic engineering (59, 62).   Two




preconditions are assumed for this method:  1) development of a dependence to



the selective compound is avoided by keeping the stock cultures of resistant




mutants on the appropriate medium without the compound, and 2) the resistance




of the bacterium to two compounds is preferable to one, not only to avoid




naturally occurring resistant bacteria in the soil, but also to lower the




potential for genetic exchange of the resistance markers to other bacteria in




the soil.  Otherwise, the technique has the following specific disadvantages:




1) The mutant and wild type organism may not behave similarly.  For example,




high level antibiotic resistance may confer symbiotic changes in Rhizobium




(15), result in the loss of pathogenicity for some plant pathogens (9, 77), or




cause plasmid loss (42).




2) In the case of antibiotics as a selective agent, not all antibiotics are




suitable as markers, thus limiting the number of strains that can be labelled




with different markers (82).




3) For some slow-growing bacteria that exist in low densities in the soil,




fungal contamination is difficult to suppress.  The more recent use of a




variety of different fungicides (17, 39) may help to eliminate this.






                            Most-Probable-Number




     The most-probable-number (MPN) technique is basically an extinction




dilution method (1) that estimates the density of organisms based on the




highest probability of the observed results (19).  Enrichment is accomplished




by withholding or adding a specific nutrient or growth factor, adding a toxic




material, or altering some other chemical or physical factor to the advantage

-------
                                                                            11
of the desired microorganism.  Thus, the desired bacterium grows at a faster

rate than the unwanted bacteria (18).  In some cases, a bacterial species can
                                                                   •
be enumerated by a plant infection MPN (89).  The MPN technique makes three

assumptions:  1) the bacteria are randomly distributed in the diluent, 2) the

presence of one or more bacteria in a tube always gives a positive response,

and 3) the organism possesses a unique and detectable metabolic reaction in

order to be selected.  The MPN method shares the same advantages and

disadvantages of the selective plate count as well as several unique advantages

and disadvantages.  Compared to a plate count method, an MPN method has advantages

of allowing enumeration of bacteria for which a suitable solid medium does not

exist and allowing enumeration of bacteria that exist at too low a density for

counting on a plate.  The disadvantages of the MPN technique are:

1) If the specificity is not great enough, false positives are a problem.

2) The MPN technique is always less precise than a colony count (86).  Also,

the standard deviations and confidence limits are too large for accurate

determinations of small but potentially important population fluctuations

(72).  To improve the precision of the technique, smaller dilution ratios or

more tubes per dilution can be done, but the number of manipulations and time

involved to do this limit its value.



                                 DNA Probes

     A DNA probe is useful for screening a large number of bacterial colonies

for a specified DNA sequence or genes (38) and can be used for any bacterial

species in which a DNA sequence unique to the organism of interest can be

isolated (31).  This method has recently been used for enumeration of bacteria

in food (43, 44), feces (47), and pond sediment (78).  Briefly, the method

involves 1) isolating the bacteria, 2) lysing the bacteria to obtain their

DNA, 3) denaturing the DNA, 4) fixing the DNA to a nitrocellulose filter, 5)

-------
                                                                            12
hybridizing a radioisotope-labelled homologous section of DNA containing the



sequence of genes of interest to the denatured DNA, and 6) assaying the amount

                                                                   •

of hybridization by autoradiography.  The steps are given here because depending



on the method, some of the steps are interchangeable.  If the original bacteria



are required, colonies must be grown and copies made by replica plating.



     The methodology of DNA probes for enumeration is still in its infancy, so



it is difficult to ascertain the advantages and disadvantages because both



direct and indirect methods of enumeration are currently in use.  The indirect



method shares many of the advantages and disadvantages of selective plate



counts, whereas the direct method shares many of the advantages and disadvantages



of fluorescent antibody.  Before these methods are considered, all DNA probe



methods share several common preconditions and disadvantages.  These are:



1) The probes require removal of any nonspecific DNA sequences from the gene



of interest to minimize background hybridization (7).



2) The range of probe specificity on the general microbial population must be



assessed.  It is possible that a number of species might possess DNA homologous



with the DNA probe (26, 31).  Partial homology has been observed between the



probe for heat-labile, toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae



(53, 68).



     The disadvantages in common are:


                                            32
1) All the current papers on DNA probes use   P as the radioisotope of choice.


                                      32
Unfortunately, the short half-life of   P necessitates frequent probe relabelling



and close monitoring of specific activity (57).  Stable, nonisotopic DNA



probes are expected to solve this problem in the future (31), but they have



yet to be tested.



2) Although the likelihood is small, hybridization with other sequences in the



bacterial genome cannot be ruled out (7).

-------
                                                                            13
     An indirect method of using DNA probes was adopted by Sayler et al.  (78)



and Echevarria et al. (26).  In the first paper, the general bacterial population
                                                                   •


in a pond sediment was targeted for the presence of toluene- and naphthalene-



degrading genes.  The^method was indirect because bacterial colonies were



isolated from sediment samples that were diluted and plated on a minimal



medium amended with toluene and naphthalene.  In the second paper, E. coli in



water was targeted for the presence of three enterotoxin genes.  Water samples



were filtered and the filters placed on MacConkey medium from which bacterial



isolates were obtained.  The method worked in both papers, but the papers



clearly demonstrated the technique was still in its developmental stages.



These and other related papers include many recommendations for increasing the



sensitivity of the method:  the use of high copy number plasmids and greater



gene specificity (78), higher specific activity of the probe (31), the use of



a simple steaming step to increase DNA binding to the nitrocellulose filters



(61), and the use of a more highly selective medium (44).  The last recommenda-



tion is difficult to ascertain because the limit of sensitivity of the method



is determined in part by the number of cells that can be placed on a filter to



allow sufficient growth so that positive cells may be detected (43).  Thus,



Sayler et al. (78) were able to achieve a high probe sensitivity of 1 colony



per 10  nonhomologous background colonies, whereas Hill et al. (44) were able



to recover only 13% of Yersinia enterocolitica from a ratio of 1,820 nonvirulent



cells to 1 virulent cell.  Furthermore, all these experiments have used bacteria



with relatively fast growth rates.  These limits of detectability may not be



as good for bacteria with slower growth rates because of overgrowth.  Thus,



the use of selective media may or may not be warranted depending on the



experimental conditions.



     In a direct method of using DNA probes, Kuritza and Salyers (57) enumerated



Bacteroides vulgatus in feces using a chromosomal fragment of that bacterium

-------
                                                                            14
as a gene probe.  No bacterial colonies were isolated.   This method clearly

identifies the major advantage of the direct method:  the difficult methodological
                                                                   *
problems of isolating and enumerating obligate anaerobes were avoided.   In

addition, another advantage was that the samples could be frozen and assayed

when convenient.  The disadvantages were:  1) the method could not distinguish

between viable and nonviable cells, although this is not such a problem with

feces, 2) the interference of fecal material necessitates additional

centrifugation steps and the need for an internal standard to correct for the

remaining interference, and 3) the method requires that the bacteria be well-

represented in the DNA mixture (>2%). It was suggested this could be improved

by solution hybridization but this was not tested.

     This direct technique has yet to be tested on soil.  Amplification of the

sensitivity to obtain a lower limit of detectibility will be a major problem

because B. vulgatus numbers exceed 10   cells per g dry weight of feces whereas

such numbers of a single bacterial species in soil do not exist.  The direct

method will certainly share the same problem of immunofluorescence in trying

to separate bacteria or even the DNA (87) from soil.


                    COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ENUMERATION

     Before considering the advantages and disadvantages of the methods of

enumeration, it is important to realize the fundamental differences between

direct and indirect methods.  Under normal circumstances, direct microscopic

bacterial counts are 10- to 100-fold higher than plate counts (30, 75).  These

differences have not been specifically elucidated, but are probably because 1)

microscopy includes dead as well as live bacterial cells, 2) some bacterial

cells in soil are either alive but sufficiently debilitated and unable to

multiply and form colonies on the plating medium  (50) or alive but do not grow

on artificial media because of unknown nutritional and physiological needs,

-------
                                                                            15
and 3) problems of obtaining complete dispersal of the bacteria in the soil

suspension for counting.  The latter is important because bacteria are not
                                                                   •
randomly dispersed in soil (18) and in rhizosphere (69) but are aggregated in

clumps and patches interpersed with areas where bacteria are sparse or absent.

Direct counting techniques can use harsher and more effective desbrption and

disruption techniques than indirect counting methods because bacterial cell

integrity and not viability is important (72).  Differences can become even

larger if the bacterial population is sufficiently debilitated.  Xu et al.

(92) noted a dramatic 6-log difference in cell density between fluorescent

antibody and culturable counts for Vibrio cholerae in a marine habitat.  It is

also interesting to note that in cases of good agreement between a direct and

indirect method, this often occurs in sterile soil or in the beginning stages

of an experiment before the bacteria can adapt to the physical, chemical, and

biological characteristics of soil.  For example, a close agreement between

fluorescent antibody counts and viable plate counts occurred for Rhizobium

japonicum (81) and a chickpea Rhizobium strain (55) in sterile soil.  Differ-

ences may even appear between indirect methods if the degree of stress is

different.  Bushby (17) observed no difference between a plant infection MPN

and antibiotic resistance plate counts in the beginning of an experiment but

considerable difference after 24 days.  It is clear that not enough is known

about bacterial stresses in soil, particularly starvation, to explain why

differences between direct and indirect methods should persist.

     Indirect procedures (plate counts, MPN) offer advantages of low cost,

both in terms of startup and routine laboratory testing, and the ability to

distinguish between live and dead cells.  The indirect method of DNA probes

offers the latter but not the former.  Direct procedures (FA, direct DNA

probes) offer advantages of mimicking the natural environment, and the ability

-------
                                                                            16
to work with organisms which are difficult to isolate.   In terms of statistics,



plate counts are statistically superior to the MPN procedure (86).   Direct



microscopy is statistically superior to plate counts because the latter method



has a three-fold larger coefficient of variation for the same replication



(75).  Yet the standard error of plate counts can be reduced by one-third to



equal the error of direct microscopy but this entails a nine-fold increase in



plate count replication and a concomitant increase in time.



     One of the most important differences between direct and indirect methods



is the ability to detect low bacterial cell densities.   For the FA technique,


                                           3      4
the lowest practical detectable limit is 10  to 10  cells per g of soil,



whereas MPN and plate counts with selective agents can detect as low as 10



cells per g of soil.  The limit for the indirect method of DNA probes would be



the same as selective plate counts whereas the direct method has not been



tried on soil.  Thus, the method of choice here would be any indirect method.



     All of the methods of enumeration share one more major disadvantage in



common:  all the methods are time-consuming and tedious.  Fortunately, all the



methods can be made less time-consuming and tedious.  In the case of the FA



technique, a fully automated device already exists for clinical specimens



(66).  For the MPN method, the use of microtiter plates (76) offers greater



statistical precision by using more tubes per dilution and a smaller dilution



rate, while saving time and media.  For plate counts, the use of spiral bacterial



plating and laser colony counting (14) is possible.  DNA probes are obviously



still under intensive development.  Finally, other future advances will enhance



methodological sensitivity.  For example, further developments in digital



microfluorimetric imaging, such as the availability of fast arithmetic video



processors and mass storage devices (4), and improvements in low light level



microscopy, such as the development of phycofluor probes (36), will enhance



the FA technique.

-------
                                                                            17
                   METHODS OF DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION


     Besides the methods of enumeration, a wide variety of immunological and
                                                                   •

biochemical tests exist for the detection and identification of specific


bacteria (67).  However, far fewer of these tests have actually been used for


bacteria in soil and even fewer are practical because of expensive instrumenta-


tion.  Among the most common of the remaining tests are phage typing, intrinsic


antibiotic resistance, and various other serological methods.



                                Phage typing


     Phage typing, the susceptibility of a specific bacterium to lysis by a


bacteriophage, has wide application in the identification of bacteria (64),


although soil bacteria have not been so extensively studied (83).  The major


advantage of phage typing is the ability to distinguish between bacterial


strains which cannot be distinguished in other ways.  This advantage is offset


to some degree by variability in host range specificity:  some phages are very


specific and attack only one or a few host species whereas other phages can


attack several species (84).  Thus, it is important to check phage specificity


before using phage typing.  The major disadvantage of phage typing is that


many factors influence the phage-bacterium interaction and the resistance of a


bacterium may occur for even trivial reasons.  For example, if a bacterium is


grown at too high a temperature for flagella to form, then a phage that


recognizes a flagellar antigen as a receptor site cannot attack (65).



                       Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance


     Intrinsic antibiotic resistance of some soil bacteria to low levels of


antibiotics can be used for bacterial identification.  The method requires


control strains to standardize the test and careful attention to inoculum size


and time of incubation to give optimal reproducibility (52).  The method has

-------
                                                                            18
advantages similar to that of selective plate counts with the added advantage


that changes are not conferred on the organism.   The method has a disadvantage
                                                                   •

of not working on all bacterial species, particularly slow-growing bacteria.


In addition, the method only permits distinction among a limited number of


strains (16).



                          Other Serological Methods



     A variety of other serological methods can be used for the generic identi-


fication of bacteria.  These methods include gel immunodiffusion, enzyme


linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and radioimmune assays.  These methods


have advantages and disadvantages similar to that of fluorescent antibody,


however they have additional disadvantages in that the number of bacteria that


can be tested is limited before the tests become unwieldy.  In addition, the


production of so many strain-specific antibodies is a time-consuming process.


The tests are routinely used to differentiate typical soil bacteria like


Rhizobium (25), Azospirillum (58), and Pseudomonas (8).



                                 CONCLUSION


     In the case of identification, DNA probes offer the greatest sensitivity


and are the method of choice, particularly for genetically-engineered bacteria


where the genetic basis of differentiation is known, but the method still


needs to be developed and refined for soil.  In the case of detection and


enumeration, a critical assessment of the superiority of one method over


another is much more difficult.  The ideal method would allow detection and


enumeration of a specific bacterial population and would estimate -the propor-


tion which is viable and metabolically active.  Rarely is this achieved and


some compromise must be accepted.  The current trend in soil microbiology is


for direct methods with greater speed, so in this regard FA and DNA probes

-------
will be the future methods of choice.  The direct methods of DNA probes and FA



both lack the ability to detect low bacterial numbers.   This is important



because bacterial numbers of a single species in soil are usually lt>w.   For


                                3      5
example, Rhizobium numbers of 10  to 10  cells per g of soil are considered



"abundant" (89).  Yet the alternative of plate counts with selective agents



ignores the failure of this method to provide conditions under which every



viable organism in the population can grow (51).  The indirect method of DNA



probes remains promising but is still in its developmental stage.  In short,



no method of detection or enumeration is perfect.  It seems reasonable to



continue to recommend a variety of methods depending on the experimental



conditions and then to assess only relative differences between bacterial



strains rather than comparing a direct and indirect method.  Thus, for condi-



tions involving bacterial numbers of >  10  cells per g of soil in the
rhizosphere, fluorescent antibody might be more appropriate, whereas under


                  4

conditions of < 10  bacterial cells per g of soil, plate counts with select



agents followed by DNA probes for identification are appropriate measures.

-------
                                                                           20
                             LITERATURE CITED




1.  Alexander, M.  1965.  Most-probable-number method for microbial populations.




    p. 1467-1472.  In C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis,  part




    2.  American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.




2.  Alexander, M.  1985.  Genetic engineering:  ecological consequences.



    Reducing the uncertainties.  Issues Sci. Technol. 1(3):  57-68.




3.  Alexander, M.,  and Clark, F.E.  1965.   Nitrifying bacteria,   p. 1477-1483.




    In C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 2.   American




    Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.




4.  Arndt-Jovin, D.J., M. Robert-Nicoud, S.J. Kaufman, and T.M.  Jovin.   1985.




    Fluorescence digital imaging microscopy in cell biology.  Science




    230: 247-256.




5.  Bakken, L.R.  1985.  Separation and purification of bacteria from soil.




    Appl. Environ.  Microbiol. 49: 1482-1487.




6.  Balkwill, D.L., T.E. Rucinsky, and I.E. Casida, Jr.  1977.  Release of




    microorganisms from soil with respect to transmission electron microscopy




    viewing and plate counts.  Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 43: 73-87.




7.  Barkay, T., D.L. Fouts, and B.H. Olson.  1985.   Preparation of a DNA gene




    probe for detection of mercury resistance genes in Gram-negative bacterial




    communities.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 686-692.




8.  Barraquio, W.L., J.K. Ladha, and I. Watanabe.  1983.  Isolation and




    identification of Nvj-fixing Pseudomonas associated with wetland rice.




    Can. J. Microbiol. 29: 867-873.




9.  Bennett, R.A.,  and E. Billing.  1975.   Development and properties of




    streptomycin resistant cultures of Erwinia amylovora derived from English




    isolates.  J. Appl. Bacteriol. 39: 307-315.

-------
                                                                            21
10.  Bohlool, B.B., and E.L.  Schmidt.   1968.   Nonspecific staining:   its

     control in immunofluorescence examination of soil.   Science
                                                                  *
     162: 1012-1014.

11.  Bohlool, B.B., and E.L.  Schmidt.   1973.   A fluorescent antibody technique

     for determination of growth rates of bacteria in soil.  Bull". Ecol.  Res.

     Comm. (Stockholm) 17: 336-338.

12.  Bohlool, B.B., and E.L.  Schmidt.   1980.   The immunofluorescence approach

     in microbial ecology,  p. 203-241.  In M. Alexander (ed.)  Advances in

     microbial ecology, Vol.  4.  Plenum Press, NY.

13.  Brady, N.C.  1974.  The nature and properties of soils. Macmillan

     Publishing Co., NY.

14.  Briner, W.W., J.A. Wunder, D.W. Blair, J.J. Parran, T.L. Blaney, and W.E.

     Jordan.  1978.  Use of spiral bacterial plating and laser  colony counting

     techniques in studies of the microbial ecology of man.  p. 154-169.   In

     A.N. Sharpe and D.S. Clark (ed.)  Mechanizing microbiology.  Charles  C.

     Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, IL.

15.  Bromfield, E.S.P., and D.G. Jones.  1979.  The competitive ability and

     symbiotic effectiveness of doubly labelled antibiotic resistant mutants

     of Rhizobium trifolii.  Ann. Appl. Biol. 92: 211-219.

16.  Bromfield, E.S.P., M. Stein, and R.P. White.  1982.  Identification of

     Rhizobium strains on antibiotic concentration gradients.  Ann.  Appl.

     Biol. 101: 269-277.

17.  Bushby, H.V.A.  1981.  Quantitative estimation of rhizobia in non-sterile

     soil using antibiotics and fungicides.  Soil Biol.  Biochem. 13: 237-239.

18.  Casida, L.E., Jr.  1968.  Methods for the isolation and estimation of

     activity of soil bacteria,  p. 97-122.  In T.R.G. Gray and D. Parkinson

     (ed.) The ecology of soil bacteria.  University of Toronto Press.

-------
                                                                            22
19.  Cochran, W.G.  1950.  Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the

     "most-probable-number."  Biometrics 6: 105-116.
                                                                   •
20.  Crozat, Y., J.C. Cleyet-Marel, J.J. Giraud, and M.  Obaton.  1982.   Survival

     rates of Rhizobium japonicum populations introduced into different soils.

     Soil Biol. Biochem. 14: 401-405.

21.  Diem, H.G., G. Godbillon, and E.L. Schmidt.  1977.   Application of the

     fluorescent antibody technique to the study of an isolate of  Beijerinckia

     in soil.  Can. J. Microbiol. 23: 161-165.

22.  Diem, H.G., E.L. Schmidt, and Y.R. Dommergues.  1978.   The use of fluorescent-

     antibody technique to study the behavior of a Beijerinckia isolate in the

     rhizosphere and spermosphere of rice.  Bull. Ecol.  Res. Comin.  (Stockholm)

     26: 312-318.

23.  Dobereiner, J., and A.B. Campelo.  1971.  Non-symbiotic nitrogen fixing

     bacteria in tropical soils,  p. 457-470.  In T.A. Lie and E.G. Mulder

     (ed.) Biological nitrogen fixation in natural and agricultural habitats.

     Plant Soil, Special Volume.

24.  Dommergues, Y.R.  1978.  The plant-microorganism system,  p. 2-37.  In

     Y.R. Dommergues and S.V. Krupa (ed.) Interaction between non-pathogenic

     microorganisms and plants.  Elsevier Publishing Co., NY.

25.  Dudman, W.F.  1971.  Antigenic analysis of Rhizobium japonicum by

     immunodiffusion.  Appl. Microbiol. 21: 973-985.

26.  Echeverria, P., J. Seriwatana, 0. Chityothin, W. Chaicumpa, and C. Tirapat.

     1982.  Detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in water by filter

     hybridization with three enterotoxin gene probes.  J.  Clin. Microbiol.

     16: 1086-1090.

-------
                                                                            23
27.  Egdell, J.W., W.A. Cuthbert, C.A. Scarlett, S.B.  Thomas,  and M.H.  Westmacott.




     1960.  Some studies of the colony count technique for soil bacteria.   J.




     Appl. Bacteriol. 23: 69-86.



28.  Elliott, L.F., C.M. Gilmour, J.M. Lynch, and D.  Tittemore.  1984.   Bacterial




     colonization of plant roots,  p. 1-16.  In R.L.  Todd and  J.ET Giddens



     (ed.) Microbial-plant interactions.  Spec. Pub.  47.   American Society  of




     Agronomy, Madison, WI.




29.  Ellis, W.R., G.E. Ham, and E.L. Schmidt.  1984.   Persistence and recovery




     of Rhizobium japonicum inoculum in a field soil.   Agron.  J. 76:  573-576.




30.  Faegri, A., V.L. Torsvik, and J. Goksoyr.  1977.   Bacterial and  fungal




     activities in soil:  separation of bacteria and fungi by  a rapid




     fractionated centrifugation technique.  Soil Siol. Biochem. 9: 105-112.




31.  Fitts, R., M. Diamond, C. Hamilton, and M. Feri.   1983.  DNA-DNA




     hybridization assay for detection of Salmonella spp. in foods.  Appl.




     Environ. Microbiol. 46: 1146-1151.



32.  Fliermans, C.B., and E.L. Schmidt.  1975.  Autoradiography and immuno-




     fluorescence combined for autecological study of single cell activity




     with Nitrobacter as a model system.  Appl. Microbiol. 30: 676-684.




33.  Fliermans, C.B., and E.L. Schmidt.  1977.  Nitrobacter in Mammoth Cave.




     Int. J. Speleol. 9: 1-19.




34.  Foster, R.C.  1985.  The biology of the rhizosphere.  p.  75-79.   In C.A.




     Parker et al. (ed.) Ecology and management of soilborne plant pathogens.




     The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.




35.  Giddens, J., and R.L. Todd.  1984.  Rhizosphere microorganisms - overview.




     p. 51-68.  In R.L. Todd and J.E. Giddens (ed.) Microbial-plant interactions.




     Spec. Pub. 47.  American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.




36.  Glazer, A.N., and L. Stryer.  1984.  Phycofluor probes.  Trends  Biochem.




     Sci. 9: 423-427.

-------
                                                                            24
37.  Goldman, M.  1968.  Fluorescent antibody methods.   Academic Press,  NY.

38.  Grunstein, M., and D.S. Hogness.  1975.  Colony hybridization:  a method
                                                                   •
     for the isolation of cloned DNAs that contain a specific gene.   Proc.

     Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72: 3961-3965.

39.  Habte, M.  1985.  Selective medium for recovering specific p&pulations  of

     rhizobia introduced into tropical soils.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50:

     1553-1555.

40.  Habte, M., and M. Alexander.  1975.   Protozoa as agents responsible for

     the decline of Xanthomonas campestris in soil.  Appl.  Microbiol. 29:

     159-164.

41.  Herr, L.J., C.R. Weaver, and R.K. Horst.  1961.  A soil dilution procedure

     applicable to rhizosphere microorganism assays.  Can.  J. Microbiol. 7:

     277-280.

42.  Hill, W.E., and C.L. Carlisle.  1981.  Loss of plasmids during enrichment

     for Escherichia coli.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41: 1046-1048.

43.  Hill, W.E., J.M. Madden, B.A. McCardell. D.B. Shah, J.A. Jagow, W.L.

     Payne, and B.K. Boutin.  1983.  Foodborne enterotoxigenic Escherichia

     coli:  detection and enumeration by DNA colony hybridization.   Appl.

     Environ. Microbiol. 45: 1324-1330.

44.  Hill, W.E., W.L. Payne, and C.C.G. Aulisio.  1983.  Detection and enumera-

     tion of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica in food by DNA colony hybridization.

     Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:636-641.

45.  Hobbie, J.E., R.J. Daley, and S. Jasper.  1977.  Use of Nuclepore filters

     for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy.   Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

     33: 1225-1228.

46.  Hornby, D.  1969.  Gravimetrical and mycological investigations of soil

     suspensions in the soil dilution plate technique.   J.  Appl. Bacteriol.

     32: 244-258.

-------
                                                                            25
47.  James, N., and M. Sutherland.  1939.  The accuracy of the plating method

     for estimating the numbers of bacteria and fungi from one dilution and
                                                                   •
     one aliquot of a laboratory sample of soil.   Can. J.  Res. 17 (C): 97-108.

48.  Jenny, H., and K. Grossenbacher.  1963.  Root-soil boundary zones as seen

     in the electron microscope.  Soil Sci. Soc.  Am. Proc. 27: 273-277.

49.  Jensen, V.  1962.  Studies on the microflora of Danish beech forest

     soils.  I.  The dilution plate count technique for the enumeration of

     bacteria and fungi in soil.  Zentralbl. Bakteriol., Parasitenkd.,

     Infektionskrankh. Hyg., Abt. 2, Naturwiss.:   Allg. Landwirtsch.  Tech.

     Mikrobiol. 116: 13-32.

50.  Jensen, V.  1968.  The plate count technique,  p. 158-170.  In T.R.G.

     Gray and D. Parkinson (ed.) The ecology of soil bacteria.  University of

     Toronto Press, Canada.

51.  Jones, J.G.  1979.  A guide to methods for estimating microbial numbers

     and biomass in fresh water.  Sci. Publ. No.  39.  Freshwater

     Biological Association, England.

52.  Josey, D.P., J.L. Beynon, A.W.B. Johnston, and J.E. Beringer.  1979.

     Strain identification in Rhizobium using intrinsic antibiotic resistance.

     J. Appl. Bacteriol. 46: 343-350.

53.  Kaper, J.B., S.L. Moseley, and S. Falkow.  1981.  Molecular characteriza-

     tion of environmental and nontoxigenic strains of Vibrio cholerae.  Infect.

     Immun. 32: 661-667.

54.  Kawamura, A., Jr.  1977.  Fluorescent antibody techniques and their

     applications.  University Park Press, Baltimore.

55.  Kingsley, M.T., and B.B. Bohlool.  1981.  Release of Rhizobium spp. from

     tropical soils and recovery for immunofluorescence enumeration.   Appl.

     Environ. Microbiol. 42: 241-248.

-------
                                                                            26
56.  Kjelleberg, S., and M. Hennansson.  1984.  Starvation-induced effects  on




     bacterial surface characteristics.  Appl. Environ.  Microbiol. 48:  497-503.




57.  Kuritza, A.P., and A.A. Salyers.  1985.  Use of a species-specific DNA



     hybridization probe for enumerating Bacteroides vulgatus in human  feces.




     Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50: 958-964.



58.  Ladha, J.K., W.L. Barraquio, and I. Watanabe.  1982.   Immunological




     techniques to identify Azospirillum associated with wetland rice.   Can.




     J. Microbiol. 28: 478-485.




59.  Liang, L.N., J.L. Sinclair, L.M. Mallory, and M. Alexander.  1982.  Fate




     of model ecosystems of microbial species of potential use in genetic %




     engineering.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44: 708-714.




60.  Louw, H.A., and D.M. Webley.  1959.  The bacteriology of the root  region




     of the oat plant grown under controlled pot culture conditions.  J. Appl.




     Bacteriol. 22: 216-226.




61.  Maas, R.  1983.  An improved colony hybridization method with significantly




     increased sensitivity for detection of single genes.   Plasmid 10:  296-298.




62.  Mallory, L.M., J.L. Sinclair, L.N. Liang, and M. Alexander.  1982.  A




     simple and sensitive method for assessing survival in environmental




     samples of species used in recombinant DNA research.   Recomb. DNA




     Tech. Bull. 5: 5-6.




63.  Meiklejohn, J.  1957.  Numbers of bacteria and actinomycetes in a  Kenya




     soil.  Soil Sci. 8: 240-247.




64.  Meynell, E.  1964.  The significance of bacteriophage in bacterial




     classification.  A review.  J. Gen. Microbiol. 36:  461-469.




65.  Meynell, E.W.  1961.  A phage,^>Y, which attacks motile bacteria.   J.




     Gen. Microbiol. 25: 253-290.

-------
                                                                            27
66.  Mishuck, E., and M. Roberts.  1975.   Automation of fluorescent antibody




     techniques.  Part 1.  p. 449-490.  In C-G Heden and T.  Illeni (ed.)




     Automation in microbiology and immunology.  John Wiley  & Sons, NY.




67.  Mitruka, B.M.  1976.  Methods of detection and identification of bacteria.




     CRC Press, Cleveland, OH.                                   *"



68.  Moseley, S.L., and S. Falkow.  1980.  Nucleotide sequence homology between




     the heat-labile enterotoxin gene of Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae




     deoxyribonucleic acid.  J. Bacteriol. 144: 444-446.




69.  Newman, E.I., and H.J. Bowen.  1974.  Patterns of distribution of bacteria




     on root surfaces.  Soil Biol. Biochem. 6: 205-209.



70.  Niepold, F., R. Conrad, and H.G. Schlegel.  1979.  Evaluation of the




     efficiency of extraction for the quantitative estimation of hydrogen




     bacteria in soil.  Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 45: 485-497.




71.  Park, R.W.A.  1978.  The isolation and use of streptomycin-resistant




     mutants for following development of bacteria in mixed  cultures, p.




     107-112.  In D.W. Lovelock and R. Davies (ed.) Techniques for the study




     of mixed populations.  Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Tech. Ser. No. 11.  Academic




     Press, NY.




72.  Rennie, R.J.  1978.  Accuracy of immunofluorescence enumeration of




     Nitrobacter in soil.  Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol 15: 279-288.




73.  Rennie, R.J., V.G. Reyes, and E.L. Schmidt.  1977.  Immunofluorescence




     detection of the effects of wheat and soybean roots on  Nitrobacter  in




     soil.  Soil Sci. 124: 10-15.




74.  Reyes, V.G., and E.L. Schmidt.  1979.  Population densities of Rhizobium




     japonicum strain 123 estimated directly in soil and rhizospheres. Appl.




     Environ. Microbiol. 37: 854-858.

-------
                                                                            28
75.  Rovira, A.D., E.I. Newman, H.J. Bowen, and R.  Campbell.   1974.   Quantitative




     assessment of the rhizoplane microflora by direct microscopy.   Soil Biol.




     Biochem. 6: 211-216.



76.  Rowe, R., R. Todd, and J. Waide.  1977.  Microtechnique  for most-probable-




     number analysis.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33: 675-680.




77.  Russell, P.E.  1975.  Variation in the virulence of some streptomycin




     resistant mutants of Pseudomonas phaseolicola.  J. Appl. Bacteriol. 39:




     175-180.




78.  Sayler, G.S., M.S. Shields, E.T. Tedford, A. Breen, S.W. Hooper, K.M.




     Sirotkin, and J.W. Davis.  1985.  Application of DNA-DNA colony hybridi-




     zation to the detection of catabolic genotypes in environmental samples.




     Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 1295-1303.




79.  Schank, S.C., R.L. Smith, G.C. Weiser, D.A. Zuberer, J.H. Bouton, K.H.




     Quesenberry, M.E. Tyler, J.R. Milam, and R.C.  Littell.   1979.   Fluorescent




     antibody technique to identify Azospirillum brasilense associated with




     roots of grasses.  Soil Biol. Biochem. 11: 287-295.




80.  Schmidt, E.L.  1973.  Fluorescent antibody techniques for the  study of




     microbial ecology.  Bull. Ecol. Res. Comm. (Stockholm)  17: 67-76.




81.  Schmidt, E.L.  1974.  Quantitative autecological study of microorganisms




     in soils by immunofluorescence.  Soil Sci. 118: 141-149.



82.  Schwinghammer, E.A.  1967.  Effectiveness of Rhizobium as modified by




     mutation for resistance to antibiotics.  Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 33:




     121-136.




83.  Staniewski, R.  1970.  Typing of Rhizobium by phages. Can. J.  Microbiol.




     16: 1003-1009.




84.  Stocker, B.A.D.  1955.  Bacteriophage and bacterial classification.  J.




     Gen. Microbiol. 12: 375-381.

-------
                                                                            29
85.  Stotzky, G.  1985.  Mechanisms of adhesion to clays, with reference to

     soil systems,  p. 195-253.  In D.C. Savage and M.  Fletcher (ed.)  Bacterial
                                                                   *
     Adhesion.  Plenum Press, NY.

86.  Taylor, J.  1962.  The estimations of numbers of bacteria by tenfold

     dilutions.  J. Appl. Microbiol. 25: 54-61.

87.  Torsvik, V.L., and J. Goksjrfyr.  1978.  Determination of bacterial DNA in

     soil.  Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 7-12.

88.  Vidor, C., and R.H. Miller.  1980.  Relative saprophytic competence of

     Rhizobium japonicum strains in soils as determined by the quantitative

     fluorescent antibody technique (FA).  Soil Biol. Biochem. 12: 483-487.

89.  Vincent, J.M.  1970.  A manual for the practical study of root-nodule

     bacteria.  Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

90.  Williams, S.T., and T.R.G. Gray.  1973.  General principles and problems

     of soil sampling,  p. 111-121.  In R.G. Board and D.W. Lovelock (ed.)

     Sampling - Microbiological monitoring of environments.  Academic Press, NY.

91.  Wollum, A.G., II, and R.H. Miller.  1980.  Density centrifugation method

     for recovering Rhizobium spp. from soil for fluorescent-antibody studies.

     Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39: 466-469.

92.  Xu, H.-S., N. Roberts, F.L. Singleton, R.W. Attwell, D.J. Grimes, and

     R.R. Colwell.  1982.  Survival and viability of nonculturable Escherichia

     coli and Vibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment.  Microb.

     Ecol. 8: 313-323.

93.  Zimmerman, R., R. Iturriaga, and J. Becker-Birck.   1978.  Simultaneous

     determination of the total number of aquatic bacteria and the number

     thereof involved in respiration.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36: 926-935.

-------
      CONJUGAL DNA TRANSFER AMONG BACTERIA:

TECHNIQUES, ISSUES, AND FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THE

   RELEASE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIA



                    ITEM #6941A



                    PREPARED BY:


                  RAMON J. SEIDLER

                    TEAM LEADER
         TERRESTRIAL  BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
        U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
              CORVALLIS, OREGON  97333

-------
                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                  PAGE
Purpose  of this report	3

General Introduction	4

Characteristics of plasmids in bacteria	6

Enhanced frequency of mating	11

Plasmid transfer in habitat simulating
     environments	13

Author's conclusions of issues presented
     and concerns raised	27

Literature cited	30

-------
                     PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT







     The  purpose  of this special report is to  familiarize  the



reader  with  some  techniques,   issues,  and  findings  in  the



scientific  literature  regarding the formation and detection  of



genetic  recombinants  produced  from the  conjugal  transfer  of



plasmid   DNA  from one bacterium into another.  Discussions  are



oriented  towards risk assessment issues regarding the release of



genetically-engineered   microorganisms  (GEMs).    Examples  are



presented   regarding possible  consequences resulting  from  the



"escape" of engineered DNA from a GEM which enters the indigenous



microbial  population  in  a  natural  environment.    Data  from



representative  publications dealing with quantitative aspects of



plasmid   DNA   transfer  and   molecular/ecological   parameters



influencing   such transfers will also be discussed.   No attempt



has  been  made to provide a broad based literature review  since



this  has recently been done (19).   The literature reviewed  and



the  data  discussed  were  chosen to  illustrate  the  kinds  of



information available on DNA transfers conducted under laboratory



and  habitat  simulating conditions.   Conjugal  transmission  of



plasmid DNA is the most relevant to discuss since a data base  of



information  exists  on plasmid transfers and  the  biotechnology



industry  depends heavily on the use of plasmids both as  cloning



vehicles   and  as  vectors  to  shuttle  DNA  between   species.
                             Page 3

-------
                      GENERAL INTRODUCTION







       Many uses of genetically engineered microorganisms involve



 their deliberate release to the environment to perform functions



which include but are not limited to:   pollution abatement,  pest



control,   crop  protection  from  frost,  modification  of  soil



fertility,  extraction/concentration  of  metals  from  ore,   and



enhanced recovery of oil (11,22).    There have been   a  variety



of  concerns raised over the possible biohazards and effects from



the released GEMs.



       Research  needed  for  assessing  possible   environmental



effects    of   GEMs   has   been   summarized (13).     Genome



characterization   and   genetic  stability   were  seen  as high



priorities  for short term research needs over the  next  several



years  (13).    Genetic  stability  refers to  the  potential  of



genetic material,  especially the engineered DNA,  to move from a



GEM  into  indigenous  microbes,  or  the movement  of  DNA  from



indigenous microbes into the GEM.



     The  potential  hazards  of   intergeneric movement  of  DNA



would  be  heightened if engineered DNA in a GEM  is  transferred



into  organisms which are already established  in  nature.   This



could result in the unintentional exposures of indigenous species



as  well  as  ecosystem processes to novel  products  of  genetic



engineering.   Following  the  transfer  of  DNA  into indigenous



species,  potential  risks could also arise from changes in  gene



expression or changes in specificity of action of  gene products.



                             Page 4

-------
An  additional  concern with regards to genetic stablity  is  the



known  ability  of  at least certain  plasmids  to  increase  the



"fertility"   of  recipient  strains for  accepting  plasmid  DNA



in  subsequent  matings.   The  ability of  certain  bacteria  to



participate in a mating has been shown to increase up to 1 million



times  through  prior acquisition of a specific  plasmid    (21).



These  and  other  issues make it important to be  familiar  with



research findings on genetic stability issues.
                             Page 5

-------
             CHARACTERISTICS OF PLASMIDS IN BACTERIA







     Genetic exchange and recombination events in prokaryotes can



occur  through  three  mechanisms.    These  are  transformation,



transduction,  and  conjugation.  It is a consensus that transfer



of DNA from cell to cell by intimate contact (conjugation) is the



most  common mechanism of DNA transfer between bacterial species.



(6).   The  most  common  mechanism  for  conjugal  DNA  transfer



involves the participation of conjugative plasmid DNA.



     A  plasmid is a closed circular DNA molecule which is stably



inherited  without  being  genetically linked  to  the  bacterial



chromosome.    Plasmid  molecules  are  of  the  order  of  1-200



Megadaltons in molecular weight,  encode for several to over  200



genes,  and  amount  to some 0.04% to 10% or more  of  a  typical



bacterial  chromosome (6).    Genes carried on plasmids can  code



for  a  variety   of  functions ranging from  the  expression  of



resistance to antibiotics and heavy  metals, virulence factors in



pathogens,and metabolic activities including dinitrogen  fixation



and  aromatic  compound biodegradation (6).    Because  of  these



novel genetic features and their rather modest size, plasmids are



very useful molecules in the  commercial  exploitation of genetic



engineering.



     A single  bacterium   may  contain several different plasmids



which  co-exist and are compatible. Incompatible plasmids  cannot



coexist in the same cell.  The molecular basis of incompatilility



is  not known.   However,  plasmids which bind to the  same  cell





                             Page 6

-------
membrane  site  might be incompatible because the site is  either



essential  for the  start of replication or because attachment  to



the  site may be essential to accomplish segregation of  plasmids



at  the  time of cell division (6).  Plasmids are  designated  as



belonging  to  one  of  some 30  incompatible  groups  which  are



designated by a capital letter (eg. Inc C plasmids).



     Plasmids  are  conjugative or  nonconjugative.   Conjugative



plasmids   are  self-transmissable  to  other   bacteria.  Many



conjugative plasmids can also transfer pieces of chromosomal  DNA



although  this  typically occurs at a much lower  frequency  than



plasmid transfer (6).



     Conjugative  plasmids  have a cluster of genes  which  allow



them to self-transfer by conjugation.  The vast majority of known



conjugative  plasmids  are found in gram-negative  bacteria.   To



date,  there  are  no known instances of  conjugal  DNA  transfer



between   gram-positive   and  gram-negative   bacteria.    Where



information  is available,  the ability of a plasmid to  transfer



itself  is  known  to be encoded by a large set of  at   least  20



genes.   This region is known as the transfer or Tra locus of the



plasmid molecule (6).



     Insertion  sequences  and transposons are  genetic  elements



occurring  on plasmids and chromosomal DNA.  Insertion   sequences



and  transposons are able to make  copies of themselves and insert



into plasmid DNA or chromosomal DNA.   Insertion sequences    are



small transposable elements of the order of 1,000 nucleotide  base



pairs (6).   Transposons are larger  elements  and  code for many





                             Page  7

-------
of the traits specified by plasmids such as antibiotic resistance.



Transposons  contain  an insertion  sequence at each end  of  the



molecule and a series of genes between.   Because of the insertion



sequence  at  each  end,  transposons  can move  readily  between



chromosomes and plasmids carrying their genes with them.



     The insertion sequence  has an identical nucleotide sequence



that is repeated at each end of the DNA  molecule.   Transposons,



like   insertion   sequences,     also    have   identical   base



sequences  that  are repeated at each end of  the  DNA  molecule.



These  terminal  nucleotide  sequences establish  the  bases  for



enzymatic insertion into other DNA molecules.



     There  appears  to be substantial transfer of genes  between



the same and different bacterial genera and species in  naturally



occurring populations (18).   Thus the issue of genetic stability



of  GEMs is NOT one as to whether gene transfer occurs in nature;



virtually  all  experts  would agree that  transfer  does  indeed



occur.   In one situation for example,  the plasmid RP1 has  been



identified  unchanged  in 17  different  bacterial  genera  (18).



It  is the opinion of Slater (18) that the natural  evolution  of



interacting    bacterial    communities   may   be   much    more



significant (interacting  through genetic transfer of DNA) in the



evolution  of  new metabolic capabilities  of  bacteria,  than   a



series  of (mutational) events occurring in one  organism.  Thus,



the  transmission  of  DNA among microbial  populations  via  DNA



plasmids is a  major  contributing factor in bacterial evolution.



Significant  questions   regarding   risk   assessment  arise





                             Page 8

-------
therefore  over the frequencies by which plasmids can transfer in

natural   microbial  communites   and  whether   engineered   DNA

fragments will be moved into unintended species.    This issue has

been  poorly  investigated (18).  It is impossible at present  to

predict on the basis of known properties of a given  plasmid-host

combination  and  on  the basis of known properties  of  a  given

ecosystem,  whether  a plasmid will persist,   or spread to  other

species in that habitat (4).


     Aggregation  of  bacteria  on a surface  stimulates  plasmid

transfer  (4).    Bacterial aggregates in nature occur widely  on

the  surfaces of inanimate objects such as  stones,  twigs,  soil

particles,  as well as on biological substrates such as roots and

leaves (12).    Bacteria in nature occur in highest densities  on

such surfaces.   Microscopy of plant root surfaces,  for example,
                     11
reveals   over 1 X 10    bacteria residing in a  cubic centimeter

within   the  rhizoplane  of  0-1  micrometer  from  plant   root

surfaces (12).   The microbial populations within this rhizoplane

include   some   of  the  most  common  candidates  for   genetic

engineering such as  Rhizobium,  Pseudomonas, Achromobacter,  and

Xanthomonas.   It  is well known by many  geneticists that use of

membrane  filters  (which promote cell aggregates)  promotes  more

efficient   conjugal  transfer  of plasmid DNA when  compared  to

broth  cell suspensions (12).   Indeed,  the relative amounts  of

cells which participate in conjugal DNA transfer  can,  depending

on the incompatability group, be rather strongly dependent upon a

solid substrate  (Table 1).

                             Page 9

-------
Table 1.   Dependency of certain conjugal matings on contact with
              a physical substrate (adapted from 12).
Plasmid             Broth/Solid         Ratio Relative Amount of
Incompatability   Surface Mating        DNA Transfer
Group                                   (solid:broth)
                                            *
I,K,FII,H,J,V       No preference       .3-5

C,D,T,X             Surface preferred    50-100

M,N,P,U,W           Surface highly      over 2,000
                    preferred

* Ratio transfer frequency on solid surface/frequency in broth
     Thus  it can be seen that the more commonly studied plasmids

of  Inc  Groups  W and P are  more  frequently  transferred  into

suitable recipient cells by an order of 2,000-fold,  when matings

are  carried out on physical substrates such as membrane  filters

or agar,  compared to broth matings.   It is important therefore,

when    investigating    the    genetic    stability    (conjugal

transmissability) of plasmid DNA, to investigate the experimental

transfer capablities under a variety of mating conditions.
                             Page 10

-------
                  ENHANCED FREQUENCY OF MATING







     It  is   known   that  plasmids may  undergo  a  variety  of



physical  changes  within  recipient  cells.     Indeed,    certain



plasmids are rather unstable in certain species and are lost upon



cultivation  in  the absence of selective  pressure  to  maintain



traits carried by plasmids.



     Pseudomonas species,  especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is



known  to be a poor recipient for many plasmids transferred  from



Enterobacteriaceae (21).      A novel case was reported following



the transfer of an Inc N plasmid into P. aeruginosa from E. coli.



The  transconjugant strain,  designated as GT24 was found to have



an  enhanced recipient ability for plasmids in subsequent  mating



trials (21).   Strain GT24 was isolated following the transfer of



Inc  N  plasmid  R45 into  strain  GT1  of  P.  aeruginosa.  GT24



was  found to allow  increased entry of plasmids.  This increased



"fertility"  as a recipient even extended  to  plasmids of  other



Inc Groups as well.   Many of the plasmid transfers into GT24 had



never previously been demonstrated in   P.  aeruginosa.   Table  2



summarizes some of these observations.
                            Page 11

-------
Table 2.   Transfer frequencies of various plasmids from E.  coli
              to a P.  aeruginosa recipient (adapted from 21).


Plasmid        Plasmid    Frequencies of transfer to P.  aeruginosa
in E. coli    Inc Group       GT1                  GT24
donor
R40a

R100-1

pIP69

R45

RP1
-7
C 9 X 10
-8
FII <10
-8
M 1 X 10
-7
N 1 X 10
-1
P 9 X 10
6 X

2 X

4 X

3 X

2 X
-1
10
-4
10
-8
10
-2
10
-1
10
* Transconjugants produced per recipient cell.
     Plasmids of Inc  Groups C and N were transferred into strain
               5      6
GT24  about  10  to 10 times more frequently then into   parental

strain  GT1.   Further  studies  revealed  that strain GT24 is  a

special transconjugant in which at least a portion of the plasmid

R45  has  become  integrated  into  the  chromosome  (21).    The

antibiotic  resistance markers associated with R45 are stable and

do not transfer during  conjugation.   Also,   no plasmid DNA can

be  isolated  from  strain  GT24.   Concerns over  this  type  of

enhanced  fertility  in  accepting plasmids and  how  or  whether

enhanced  fertility might occur in environmental situations,  may

become   important  issues in future risk assessment  discussions

on genetic stability.
                             Page 12

-------
      PLASMID TRANSFER IN HABITAT-SIMULATING ENVIRONMENTS







     There  are  a  limited number of studies which  address  the



transfer   of   plasmids   among   bacteria    contained    under



environmentally "simulated" conditions.   Simulated environmental



conditions  refer  to  those  studies which  make  an  effort  to



maintain   and  monitor   laboratory  grown bacteria in  chambers



placed  into water or sewage,  or to release tagged strains  into



soil or onto plants.



     Mach  and  Grimes  (1982) studied the conjugal  transfer  of



plasmid  DNA  encoding resistance to antibiotics  between enteric



bacteria confined to diffusion chambers.   The chambers contained



sterile  domestic  wastewater  along with a  suitable  donor  and



recipient.   The chambers were incubated in primary or  secondary



settling   tanks  at  a  wastewater  treatment  plant.    Soluble



nutrients  from the wastewater  were able to diffuse  across  the



membrane  surrounding  the  immersed  chambers.    Rates  of  DNA



conjugal  transfer from donor to recipient were then compared  to



those  observed  in laboratory cultures grown in either  nutrient



broth  or  in sterile unchlorinated primary  wastewater  influent



contained  in test tubes.   Species of bacteria studied  included



Proteus  mirabilis,  E. coli,  and a  human  pathogen,  Shigella



sonnei.   None  of these  bacteria are candidates for release  to



the environment by the biotechnology industry.   However, methods



of  study  and general observations may be applicable to  plasmid



transfers   occurring  in  eutrophic  fresh  water   environments



polluted with domestic wastewaters.  Table 3 summarizes a portion



                             Page 13

-------
of the results presented in that study.

     Results   revealed  overall  plasmid  transfer  rates  under
                                     -3
laboratory conditions of about 2 X 10   transconjugants per donor

for  both  nutrient  broth  and  sterile  unchlorinated   primary

wastewater.   Rates  in  the chambers immersed into  primary  and
                                                              -5
secondary   wastewater   averaged  2-logs  less,    2-7   X  10

transconjugants  per  donor.   Transfer was evaluated at  20C  in

laboratory   incubation  while  in  situ  temperatures   at   the

wastewater plant are below the known optimum for plasmid transfer

in species of enteric bacteria.   The lower temperatures probably

account  for the 100-fold reduction in transfer rates compared to

the  laboratory  observations.

     In  these  studies  there were no  viable  indigenous  cells

within the chambers to compete for nutrients or to serve as other

fortuitous participants in the mating process.   Furthermore, the

species  diversity in the wastewater is  significantly  different

from  the  pure  culture  studies  used  in  the  chamber  mating

experiments.   Plasmid  transfers  are much more  likely  between

species  of E. coli than in intergeneric transfers involving the

diversity of species present in natural  wastewater.    Therefore

one  must view the absolute numerical results of this study  with

caution   when   attempting   to  extrapolate  to   the   natural

environment.  The transconjugation rates reported are most likely

higher then those occurring in wastewater.
                             Page 14

-------
Table 3.   Frequencies of antibiotic resistance transfer  between
            donor  and  recipient  enteric bacteria (adapted
            from  10).

                                                      _4 *
Donor X Recipient             R-plasmid transfer (X 10  )
                         nutrient  sterile  sterile 1  sterile 2
                           broth   sewage  wastewater wastewater
E.
E.
P.
P.
P.

coli HI X S.sonnei S
coli 2 X S. sonnei S
mirabilis H X E.
mirabilis S X E.
mirabilis H X S.

coli
coli
H3
H3
sonnei S


10
60
23
20
7
19
45
27
0.0
0.0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5
7
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
.2
.5
.4
.0
.0
* Transconjugants per donor



     An  interesting  feature  involving the  dynamic  nature  of

bacterial numbers  and  the  volume of wastewater  treated  daily,

deserves  mention  in attempting an overview  of  these  transfer

frequencies.   Mach  and  Grimes  reported  an  average  rate  of
        -5
5  X  10   transconjugants per donor formed during a 3-hr  mating
                                                        5
period.  If one conservatively assumes  there are 5 X 10  E. coli

donor  cells in a wastewater containing a total population of 1 X
  8
10 cells/ml (0.5% are E. coli donor cells),  then there should be

1 transconjugant produced during a 3-hr period.   The  wastewater
                                       6
plant  in this study processes 6.4 X 10  liters of sewage per day

and is a relatively small operation.   The total daily number  of

transconjugants produced at this treatment plant would be:
                                                    9
       1 transconjugant/ml/3-hrs X 24 hrs X 6.4 X 10 ml of raw
                                                9
       sewage processed per day or about 50 X 10  transconjugants

       produced per day.

                             Page 15

-------
     Naturally  the  waste treatment plant reduces  significantly

the  number  of  bacteria  which leave the  plant  in  the  final

effluent.  Even if the final effluent is chlorinated, it will not

be  sterile.   If one assumes there is a 7-log (10-million  fold)

reduction   in  total  bacterial  numbers  following   wastewater

treatment,  there  may  still be some 5,000 recombinant  bacteria

which leave this wastewater plant daily as a result of the single

hypothetical   example of conjugation that has been monitored  in

the study.  Such bacteria  would be multiply antibiotic resistant

since  the  transmission  of plasmids  specifying  resistance  to

several antibiotics are being transferred.  These transconjugants

may  in turn  function  as  new  donor  strains  in the receiving

stream  environment.   There will be untold additional  types  of

mating  pair combinations among other bacterial species depending

upon  the  incidence  of conjugative plasmids  in  the  bacterial

wastewater population.

     A  very  similar  study  on  conjugation  using    diffusion

chambers  immersed in wastewater was carried out by  Altherr  and
                                                               -5
Kasweck (1982).  Rates of plasmid transfer in wastewater were 10
     -6
to 10   transconjugants per donor compared with rates which  were

10  to  100-fold  higher under laboratory incubation  conditions.

The  similar  10  to 100-fold difference in  transfer  rates  for

laboratory  vs  wastewater conditions is similar to the range  of

differences recorded in the Mach and Grimes study.


                             Page 16

-------
     Another,  quite  recent study revealed that so-called "safe"

or   nonconjugative  plasmids  can be mobilized  and  transferred

into  bacteria  indigenous  to the wastewater  environment  by  a

mechanism   called  cointegrate  formation  (5).    This  process

requires  an  initial transfer of a  conjugative plasmid such  as

the  RlOO-1  into a second cell which contains  a  nonconjugative

plasmid, such as pBR325.  A conintegrate may form between the two

plasmids  making  pBR325 take on the ability to transfer  into  a

third  cell.   In the report of Gealt et al (1985) plasmid RlOO-1

was transferred from E. coli strain  1784 into E. coli  strain

KA1661  which contains pBR325.   Thus coincubation of KA1661  and

1784 in L broth resulted in high molecular weight DNA acquisition

in KA1661.  The high molecular weight plasmid was the cointegrate

formed  between  plasmid RlOO-1 and pBR325.   Transfer of  pBR325

during  a  triparental  mating  was  subsequently  confirmed   by

isolation of transconjugants from a mating between KA1661 X  1784

X E. coli  1997.   The following  list of strains are examples of

the  participants in a triparental mating involving the formation

of a cointegrate DNA plasmid molecule.

          A.  E. coli  1784(R100-1)          mobilizer strain

          B.I  E. coli KAl66l(pBR325)        pBR nonconjugative

          B.2  E. coli  2656(pBR322)         pBR nonconjugative

          C.  E. coli  1997(recipient cell)  contains no plasmids

     Biparental  matings require organism types A and B or A  and

C.   Triparental matings require types A,  B,  and C.  Biparental
                                               4       8
matings  conducted  in  L  broth  generated  10  to  10


                             Page 17

-------
transconjugants/ml  after 25 hrs of incubation (5).    The L broth

matings are obviously not habitat simulating experiments but were

conducted   for   purposes   of  comparison   with   triparental

recombinants  found  in other experiments.    Results  of  certain

triparental  matings  from  incubations in rich  L  broth  medium

produced results as summarized in Table 4.
Table  4.   Transconjugants  produced  from  triparental  matings
             involving  laboratory  strains of E. coli incubated
             in  L  broth (adapted from 5).


E. coli strains          Initial cell        No. transconjugants
used in triparental      density of each          per ml
matings                  E. coli strain

                               9                   5
 1784(R100-1)            2 X 10              3 X 10
                               8         from the triparental
 2656(pBR322)            2 X 10              mating
                               9
 1997                    2 X 10
                               8                   8
 1784(R100-1)            1 X 10              4 X 10
                               7        from the triparental
KA166l(pBR325)           8 X 10             mating
                               7
 1997                    5 X 10
     Several  replications  of these crosses were  conducted with
                                                         7      9
variations in cell densities  of the participants from 10  to 10

cells/ml.   There was no strong correlation between the number of

transconjugants   produced  and  the  cell  densities   of   the

triparental    participants   over   the   concentration    range

investigated.   Nevertheless, in those crosses involving E. coli,

                             Page 18

-------
pBR  nonconjugative plasmids were mobilized in triparental matings

at  rates  which did not significantly differ from  the  transfer

rates  recorded for the conjugative plasmid RlOO-1 in  biparental

matings.


     Through the use of triparental matings,  it was also possible

to  follow the mobilization of pBR325 into two species of enteric

bacteria recently  isolated from wastewater (Table 5).  The rates

of  transconjugants  produced  were  less  than  those  involving

laboratory  recipient strains such as  1997 by a factor  of  some

100 to one-hundred thousand-fold (5).

     Matings  of  cells  were also conducted  in  wastewater  for

detecting  possible  triparental  matings.   These  matings  were

conducted  in  300  to  600  microliter  volumes  of   autoclaved

wastewater  placed on top of a Millipore filter/saturated  filter

pad and incubated at 37C. Transconjugants were formed on the pads
                                                     2      5
as a result of triparental matings at the rates of 10  to 10  per

ml.  One should be cautioned however, that   the filter surface,

the  temperature,  the potential carryover of nutrients from  the

rich  broth medium,  and the autoclaved wastewater all combine to

make  this  a  highly  artifical  replication  of  the  "natural"

environment.
                             Page 19

-------
Table  5.   Transconjugants  produced  from  triparental  matings
             involving  wastewater isolates incubated in L broth
             (adapted from 5).


E. coli strains       Initial cell      No. transconjugants/ml
in triparental        density of each
mating                E. coli strain

1784(R100-1)

KAl66l(pBR325)

E. cloacae 191*

1784(R100-1)

KAl66l(pBR325)

E. coli 343
7
10
7
10
7
10
8
10
7 8
10 -10
7 8
10 -10
1 3
5 X 10 to 1 X 10
from the triparental
mating


2 3
10 to 10
from the triparental
mating


* Strains which were isolated from wastewater



     The  general  mechanism for the transfer  of  nonconjugative

plasmids  such as pBR325 and pBR322 involves their  cointegration

into a helper plasmid,  such as the R100-1 used in the studies of

Gealt,  et al.   Thus the size (molecular weight) of the original

plasmids are likely to change in the transconjugants produced  in

a  triparental  mating.   In  some cases only a  portion  of  the

original   pBR325   plasmid   became  integrated   into   R100-1.

Apparently,  the  sizes of the nonconjugative plasmid  will  vary

considerably.

     No one knows whether triparental matings occur in nature  at

rates  that  are  detectable or at rates which may raise  a  risk

assessment  "issue".   However,  Levine et al (9) have shown that

triparental matings involving  recombinant strains of E. coli  in

                             Page 20

-------
the  human  intestine  are extremely  rare.    In  those  studies,

recombinants  produced  from  triparental matings  involving  the

mobilization  of pBR325 were only detected when  the  "ecosystem"

was  disturbed  following the oral administration of  antibiotics

that  selectively  favored transconjugants.    Those  results  are

distinctly  different  from  the  report  of  Gealt  et  al  (5).

However,  the  latter  studies  were carried  out  under  aerobic

incubation and in the absence of competing natural flora.  On the

other  hand,  it has been indicated that some 50% of the  natural

coliform population contains conjugative ("helper") plasmids (6).

Therefore there may appear to be  ample opportunities in  certain

natural environments  for cointegrate plasmid formation to occur.

     As mentioned earlier in this report,  some  plant-associated

bacterial  species occur in high cell densities  and such species

are of interest to the biotechnology industry.  Published studies

have   shown  that  recombinants  may  form  from  the   conjugal

transmission  of plasmid DNA among bacteria associated with plant

crops  and  other plant matter (7,8, 20).

     In  one study,  rates of transconjugants produced from broth

matings  in  the laboratory were compared with rates  which  were

produced  during  growth  of Klebsiella strains on the  roots  of

radish plants and in moistened sawdust (20).   Radish seeds  were
                             3      4
soaked in broth containing 10  to 10  bacteria/ml,   resulting in

some  10  to 100 recipient cells adsorbed to the surface of  each

seed.    Seeds   were  planted  in  nonsterile  sandy-loam   soil

containing  indigenous bacteria.  Prospective donor bacteria were

                             Page 21

-------
                                           2      3
pipetted over the seeds to provide about 10  to 10  viable donors

in the vicinity of each seed.  Radish plants were removed  weekly

and the rhizosphere analyzed for transconjugants of the Klebsiella

recipient originally applied to the seeds.   Table  6  summarizes

the results of that study.


Table 6.   Transfer of antibiotic resistance in broth and on  the
            radish   rhizosphere  present  in  natural  soil
            (adapted   from 20).

                                                           -5
Donor X Recipient                  R-plasmid transfer (X 10  )
                                      Penassay   radish
                                      broth     rhizosphere*


Klebsiella SL5 X Klebsiella UG13        1.3        0.02

            "  X Klebsiella MH29        5.2        0.2

            11  X Klebsiella U010994   500          0.02

            11  X Klebsiella PC2         0.3        0.02

          UG28 X Klebsiella DS1       530          0.02

*  Calculated as transconjugants/donor/gram radish.
     The number of transconjugants produced per donor illustrates

that  10% to much less than 0.1% recombinants were formed in  the

soil on the radish rhizosphere as compared to those formed in the

rich  broth medium.   Both donor and recipient bacteria used  had

been recently isolated from their natural habitats.   Nothing was

known about their genetic compatability or lack thereof.   Unlike

previous  studies,  the production of these transconjugants  took

place  under  field  simulated  conditions  in  the  presence  of

indigenous  microflora  and may have come close to mimicking  the

                             Page 22

-------
interactions of GEMs with indigenous microbial flora.

     The actual number of recombinant bacteria formed per gram  of

radish  plant is not an impressive number.    One would anticipate

there  to  be less than 100 such bacteria per  plant  rhizosphere.

However, in a single row of plants 100 feet in length there would
                    5                         8
be  approximately 10   recombinants or some 10   per acre.

     The  studies  conducted by Lacy's research group  have  been

concerned  with  the possible transmission of plasmid  DNA  among

bacteria which cause plant diseases (7,8).    The transmission of

antibiotic  resistance among bacteria which cause plant  diseases

which  are  controlled by antibiotic therapy has  great  economic

implications.  In  the 1975 study,  Lacy and  Leary  demonstrated

that plasmid RP1 was transferred in lima bean pods injected  with

O.lml suspensions of donor and recipient cells.   Transmission of

the  plasmid,  both  in  the  pods and in  leaves  inoculated  by

congestion  with  water   containing  bacteria, occurred  between

Pseudomonas glycinea and Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Table 7).
                             Page 23

-------
Table  7.   Transmission  of plasmid RPl in  vitro(in  laboratory
             media) and in planta (adapted from 7).
                                                      -2
     Donor X Recipient        R-plasmid transfer (X 10  )*
                              in vitro       in planta
P. glycinea X P. phaseolicola  5.8,1.1,      55 (pods)
                            2.7,.49,2.2      8.2 (leaves)

* counts expressed as transconjugants/recipient
     It was conservatively concluded that plasmid transmission as

studied,  occurred  at  least as well in planta  as  with  broth-

cultured laboratory procedures.  The authors  concluded that this

transfer,  along with an ability of E. coli to also transfer the

plasmid into Pseudomonas species in the bean pods,  suggests that

plasmid transfer in planta is not just limited to related species

of plant pathogenic bacteria.

     In  a  more  recent study ( 8 ) Lacy  et  al,  followed  the

transfer  of plasmid RPl among species of Erwinia and Pseudomonas

syringae  pathovar  syringae in planta  in  pear  blossoms.   The

investigators   mentioned  that  streptomycin  chemotherapy   had

previously  been   effective  in  the  treatment  of fire  blight

in  pears caused by  Erwinia amylovora.     However,  there is an

increasing  emergence  of streptomycin resistant  strains  of  E.

amylovora.   Oxytetracycline has been suggested as an alternative

treatment.   Thus,  the  purpose  of  the current  study  was  to

ascertain  whether  plasmid-borne resistance  to  oxytetracycline


                             Page 24

-------
may also occur due to plasmid transmission in planta.



     In  interpreting  the  outcome of  the  research,   it  seems



relevant  to  detail how the in planta  matings  were  conducted.



Cultures  were  pregrown on agar,  washed in  sterile  distilled



water,  and  resuspended.   Approximately  0.03 ml recipient  was



added  onto  the  surface of the receptacle of  a  detached  pear



blossom.   Then  0.005 ml of the donor was added to  the  droplet



containing  the  recipient  cells.   The detached  blossoms  were



maintained (with pedicels immersed in water) in moist chambers at



25C  for  4 to 7 hrs.   Bacteria were washed from  the  blossoms,



concentrated by centrifugation, and plated onto appropriate media



selective   for   donor   or  recipient   alone,   or   for   the



transconjugants.  Putative transconjugants were verified first on



media  selective for phenotypic expression of the  recipient  and



then  by plasmid extraction and purification.  Table 8 summarizes



these mating experiments.
                             Page 25

-------
Table 8.   Frequencies of antibiotic resistance transfer  between
            Erwinia herbicola or P. syringae donors and
            E. amylovora recipients, both in vitro and in planta
            (adapted from 8).


     Donor X Recipient           R-plasmid transfer frequency*

                                in vitro       in planta
                                  -3     -7      -2     -6
P. syringae X E. amylovora      10  to 10      10  to 10

                                  -5     -6      -1     -8
E. herbicola X E. amylovora     10  to 10      10  to 10

* Transconjugants per donor
     It  is  apparent that the in planta transfer of pRPl  to  E.

amylovora  was  often greater than  the in vitro  transfer  rate.

The  authors indicated however,  that there was a great range  in

the  transfer rates.    No explanation was offered for the higher

transfer rate in the in planta studies.   The great range in  the

rates  was   attributed to differences in the ratio of  donor  to

recipient.   These data serve to underscore the earlier  articles

reviewed   where     plasmid  transfer  in   habitat   simulating

environments was shown to occur, often at rates which approach or

occasionally exceed those found in laboratory media.
                             Page 26

-------
  AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS OF ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONCERNS RAISED
     1.   Discussions  over the risk assessment issues  regarding
genetic  stability of GEMs should not be directed at WHETHER  DNA
exchange occurs among bacteria in the  environment.

     2.  The  major issue  regarding the intergeneric movement of
DNA deals with the transfer of genetically-engineered DNA from  a
GEM into organisms already established in nature.  Concerns arise
from  unintentional exposures of indigenous species and ecosystem
processes to novel products of genetic engineering.    Changes  in
expression  of  engineered genes in new genetic  backgrounds  may
result  in  an  increase  or  shut  off  of  transcriptional  and
expression activities.

     3.   Escape of the engineered DNA from the original GEM into
the indigenous population may  prolong the persistence of the  new
genetic  element and make many conventional detection/enumeration
techniques ineffective (selective media, fluorescent antibodies).

     4.   Transmission of DNA among microbial populations via DNA
plasmids is thought to be a major factor in bacterial  evolution.
It follows therefore,  that the escape of engineered DNA into the
natural  population,  may  influence the evolution of  indigenous
bacteria.

     5.  Transfer of DNA involving cell contact (conjugation) may
be  strongly influenced,  depending on the plasmid Inc group,  by
contact  with  a  substrate.   Substrate  contact  is  common  in
symbiotic  associations in terrestrial ecosystems  (plant  roots,
intestinal tract insects, animals, etc).

     6.   Published studies reveal  that  DNA transfer  has  been
demonstrated  in  a  variety  of artificial habitats  intended to
mimic the "natural" environment.   Transfer  rates  are dependent
upon plasmid Inc  groups,  temperature,  cell  densities  of  the
interacting  species, and  other  physical/chemical conditions of
the mating environs.   Estimates of trillions  of transconjugants
form daily within wastewater, plant root and leaf surfaces.

     7.   Standard  assay  systems  are  needed  to  methodically
evaluate,  on  a  case-by-case basis,  the genetic  stability  of
various  plasmid  groups  in an array of  bacterial  species  and
habitats   which   mimic  actual  or  anticipated   GEM   release
situations.
                             Page 27

-------
                        LITERATURE CITED
1.   Altherr,  M.  R., and K. L. Kasweck.  1982.  In situ studies
with   membrane  diffusion  chambers  of  antibiotic   resistance
transfer in Escherichia coli.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  44:838-
843.

2.   Chatterjee, A. K., and M. P. Starr.  1972.  Genetic transfer
of   episomic   elements   among  Erwinia   species   and   other
enterobacteria:  F'lac+.  J. Bacteriol.  111:169-176.

3.   Coplin, D.L.  1978.  Properties of F and P group plasmids in
Erwinia stewartii.  Phytopathol.  68:1637-1643.

4.    Freter,  R.   1984.   Factors  affecting  conjugal  plasmid
transfer   in   natural  bacterial   communities,    In   Current
Perspectives in Microbial Ecology,  M.  J.  Klug and C.  A. Reddy
(ed.),  American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.,  pp
105-114.

5.   Gealt,  M.  A.,  M.  D. Chai, K. B. Alpert, and J. C. Boyer.
1985.   Transfer of plasmids pBR322 and pBR325 in wastewater from
laboratory  strains of Escherichia coli to bacteria indigenous to
the waste disposal system.   Appl.  Environ.  Microbiol.  49:836-
841.

6.   Hardy,  K.  1981.  Bacterial plasmids.  American Society for
Microbiology, Washington, D.C.  104pp.

7.   Lacy, G. H., and J. V. Leary.  1975.  Transfer of antibiotic
resistance plasmid RP1 into Pseudomonas glycinea and  Pseudomonas
phaseolicola in vitro  and in planta.  J. Gen. Microbiol.  88:49-
57.

8.   Lacy,  G.  H.,  V.  K.  Stromberg,  and N. P. Cannon.  1984.
Erwinia  amylovora mutants and in planta-derived  transconjugants
resistant to oxytetracycline.  Can J. Plant Pathology  6:33-39.

9.    Levine,  M. M., J. B. Kaper, H. Lockman, R. E. Black, M. L.
Clements,  and S. Falkow.  1983.  Recombinant DNA risk assessment
studies  in  man:   efficacy  of poorly mobilizable  plasmids  in
biologic containment.  Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull.  6:89-97.

10.  Mach, P. A., and D. J. Grimes.  1982.  R-plasmid transfer in
a  wastewater  treatment  plant.    Appl.   Environ.   Microbiol.
44:1395-1403.

11.   Milewski,  E.  A.   1985.   Field testing of microorganisms
modified by recombinant techniques:   applications,  issues,  and
development of  "points to consider" document.   Recomb. DNA Tech.

                             Page 28

-------
Bull.  8:102-108.

12.   Genetic interactions among microbial communities.   pp.379-
421.  In:  Microbes in their natural environments.  J. H. Slater,
R.  Whittenbury,  and J. W. T. Wimpenny, eds.  Society for Genral
Microbiology Symposium.

13.    Rissler,   J.   F.    1984.   Research  needs  for  biotic
environmental  effects of genetically-engineered  microorganisms.
Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull.  7:20-30.

14.   Shaw,  D. R., and V. J. Cabelli.  1980.  R-plasmid transfer
frequencies  from environmental isolates of Escherichia  coli  to
laboratory and fecal strains.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  40:756-
764.

15.  Singleton, P., and A. E. coli below 22C.  Appl. Environ.
Microbiol.  42:789-791.

16.   Singleton,  P.   1983.   Colloidal  clay inhibits  conjugal
transfer  of  R-plasmid  Rldrd-19  in  Escherichia  coli.   Appl.
Environ. Microbiol.  46:756-757.

17.   Singleton,  P.,  and A.  E.  Anson.  1983.  Effect of pH on
conjugal transfer at low temperatures.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
46:291-292.

18.   Slater,  J.  H.   1984.  Genetic interactions in  microbial
communities,   In,  Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, M.
J. Klug and C. A. Reddy (ed).  American Society for Microbiology,
Washington, D. C., pp 87-93.

19.   Stotzky,  G.  and H.  Babich.   1984.  Fate of genetically-
engineered microbes in natural environments.   Recomb.  DNA Tech.
Bull.  7:163-188.

20.   Talbot,  H.  W.,  D.  Y.  Yamamoto,  M.  W. Smith and R. J.
Seidler.   1980.   Antibiotic  resistance and its transfer  among
clinical   and   nonclinical  Klebsiella  strains  in   botanical
environments.  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  39:97-104.

21.   Tardif,  G.  and  R.  B.  Grant.   1982.   Transfer of  IncN
Plasmids  to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.   Antimicrob.  Agents  Chem.
22:142-144

22.     Vidaver,   A.K.    1985.   Plant-associated  agricultural
applications    of    genetically   engineered    microorganisms:
projections and constraints.  Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull.  8:97-102
                             Page  29

-------