TERRESTRIAL MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM ------- TERRESTRIAL MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM BRIEFING BOOK MARCH 1986 Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Corvallis, Oregon 97333 ------- Table of Contents Page Microbial Ecology at CERL 1 Laboratory Physical Components 2 Recent Accomplishments of the Program 3 Research Activities - Inhouse 4 Extramural 10 Personnel - EPA 20 - Visiting 36 Appendix 40 1. Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on Predatory Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidal). 2. Draft - Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on the Common Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) 3. Draft-Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on Predatory Hemipterans (Hemiptera: Lygacidae). 4. Progress Report - Methods for Assessing Fate of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms in Soil (8/1/85 - 1/31/86). Investigators: J. M. Tiedje and B. H. Chelm, Michigan State University. 5. Progress Report - Transformation Studies: Fate and Effects of Genetically-Engineered Microbes in Terrestrial Environments. Investigator: G. Stozky, New York University, NYC 6. Draft - Interim Protocol for Oral Exposure of Avian Species to Microbial Pest Control Agents 7. Draft-Interim Protocol for Intraveneous Exposure of Avian Species to Microbial Pest Control Agents. ------- Table of Contents Page Microbial Ecology at CERL Laboratory Physical Components Recent Accomplishments of the Program Research Activities - Inhouse - Extramural Personnel - EPA - Visiting Appendix 1. Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on Predatory Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidal). 2. Draft - Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on the Common Green Lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) 3. Draft-Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on Predatory Hemipterans (Hemiptera: Lygacidae). 4. Progress Report - Methods for Assessing Fate of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms in Soil (8/1/85 - 1/31/86). Investigators: J. M. Tiedje and B. H. Chelm, Michigan State University. 5. Progress Report - Transformation Studies: Fate and Effects of Genetically-Engineered Microbes in Terrestrial Environments. Investigator: G. Stozky, New York University, NYC 6. Draft - Interim Protocol for Oral Exposure of Avian Species to Microbial Pest Control Agents 7. Draft-Interim Protocol for Intraveneous Exposure of Avian Species to Microbial Pest Control Agents. ------- 8. Report - Assessment of Methods for the Detection, Identification, and Enumeration of Genetically-Engineered Bacteria in Soil (2/86). 9. Draft Report - Conjugal DNA Transfer Among Bacteria: Techniques, Issues, and Funding Relevant to the Release of Genetically Engineered Bacteria. ------- MICROBIAL ECOLOGY AT CERL Overall Mission The Microbial Ecology/Biotechnology Team is responsible for developing test methods based on research and databases concerning the potential risks of microbial pest control agents and genetically-engineered microorganisms on terrestrial ecosystems and effects of hazardous pollutants on microbial processes, activities, and interactions with other living components. The activities include: A. The development of methodologies to assess environmental risks from genetically-engineered microorganisms (OTS,OPP). B. The development of scientific protocols for testing the effect of biological control agents to non-target organisms (OPP). C. The development of environmental risk models to estimate and predict the impact of xenobiotic chemicals to microbial populations involved in nutrient transformations important to plants (OTS, OPP). ------- MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY Laboratory Physical Components 1. Main Laboratory a. Three P2 biotechnology laboratories b. Soils microbiology/microbial ecology laboratory. c. Enzymology/analytical biochemistry laboratory d. Virus laboratory for biological control agent research. e. Insectory 2. Microcosm Containment facility 3. Avian Test facility 4. Greenhouse/plant toxicology laboratory 5. Soils preparation laboratory 6. Tissue culture containment facility ------- Recent Accomplishments of the Program I. Biotechnology Aided in the preparation of the report: 1. Aided in the preparation of the report: Research Needs in Biotech- nology the and Environment, 1985, Office of Public Sector Programs, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC 2. Gave presentations on EPA's coordinated biotechnology plan for Congress, OPTS and ORD. 3. Evaluated four methods of measuring DNA transfer between candidate GEMs for use in the terrestrial environment. 4. Demonstrated applicability of "simple" and "complex" microcosms for simulating environmental conditions for detecting and measuring DNA transfer events. 5. Invited to Fourth International Conference on Safety Evaluation and Regulation; Safety Evaluation in Biotechnology. 6. Establishment of FY 85 extramural program to support the first projects dealing directly with established agency risk assessment needs in terrestrial biotechnology (Michigan State; New York University). 7. Sponsored summer workshop to develop program plans for FY 86 extramural biotechnology research program in both terrestrial and aquatic areas. II. Biological Control Agents 1. Developed interim protocols for biological control agents a. Predatory mites—reviews completed b. Predatory Chrysopidae (lacewing) — in review c. Predatory Lygaeidae—in review d. Predatory Hymenopterans—in preparation e. Predatory Coleoptera—in preparation 2. Developed quantitative MPCA inoculation/artifical diets to culture nontarget beneficial arthropods. 3. Completed construction of working instrumentation for Electronic Bioassay System to evaluate effects of MPCA's on insects. 4. Completed initial steps for a computer searchable data base on effect of biological agents on arthropods. ------- 5. Published manuscript entitled "Effects of MPCAs on Non-Target Beneficial Arthropods" by Flexner, Lighthart and Croft; in press: Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 6. Completed interim protocols on oral and intraveneous exposure of avian species to MPCAs. Protocol on inhalation is under development. 7. Established tissue culture facility for propagating baculoviruses. III. Microbial Ecology 1. Developed new research laboratory for studying the effect of chemicals on microbial initiated processes and biodegradation. 2. Recruiting technical help for establishing research in studying microbial mediated transformations in soil. 4' ------- INHOUSE RESEARCH IN MICROBIAL ECOLOGY/BIOTECHNOLOGY ------- PROJECT TITLE: Fate and genetic stability of genetically-engineered microorganisms in the terrestrial environment. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Ramon Seidler, Mike Walter and Arlene Porteous INSTITUTION: Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory OBJECTIVES: To develop test methods for studying the genetic stability of GEMs, particularly those impacting terrestrial environments. In the development of these test methods, a combination of laboratory as well as simple and complex microcosms approaches are envisioned. Further objectives include determining applicability of laboratory techniques in quantitatively detecting trans- conjugants which may form in microcosms, and ascertaining whether indigenous recombinants which received engineered DNA can in turn become donors of this engineered DNA to indigenous species. Further subobjectives include determining whether a generalized technique can be developed to detect transfer of DNA from GEM species into certain components of the natural flora. The stability of engineered DNA within a GEM is influenced by a complex array of factors, both biological as well as physical/chemical. A longer term objective is to address the effects of GEM DNA stability on control of substrate utilization specificity and gene expression within transconjugants. OUTPUTS: Special Report: Conjugal DNA transfer among bacteria: issues, and findings relevant to the release of GEMs. techniques, Special Report: A data base for detecting, identifying, and enumerating GEMs released into terrestrial environments. Journal Article: An evaluation of four techniques for the detection and enumeration of transconjugants in laboratory media. ------- PROJECT TITLE: Survival and fate of genetically-engineered microorganisms in the insect-plant ecosystem. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: John Armstrong, Guy Knudsen INSTITUTION: Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this research is to study the survival, fate, and genetic stability of engineered microbes (GEMs) in insects feeding on plants that have been sprayed with GEMs. The objective includes the development of test methods to evaluate factors important in the survival and fate of specific groups of GEM species appropriate to those that industry is developing for release into the plant/terrestrial ecosystem. Understanding the role of the insect gut and how that ecosystem affects the survival, genetic stability and fate of GEMs are significant subobjectives. The role of the plant system and the physical/chemical environs (daylight hrs, humidity, temperature) are fundamental parameters which can impact GEM survival and thus genetic stability. OUTPUTS: Journal Article: Fate and survival of recombinant bacteria and recombinant DNA in insects. Journal Article: Regrowth of recombinant bacteria and persistence of DNA in insect frass. Test methods for studying the fate and genetic stability of GEMs in the insect/plant ecosystem. ------- PROJECT TITLE: Microbial Ecology/Risk Assessment PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Charles Hendricks OBJECTIVE: .Prepare necessary planning documentation to develop a terrestrial microbial ecology program on risk assessment. This is to include appropriate material on the in situ treatment of hazardous wastes. INSTITUTION: Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Toward the goal of establishing a new laboratory in terrestrial microbial ecology, the following has been accomplished. 1. Completed nine month sabbatical leave at the Department of Plant & Soil Biology, University of California, Berkeley 2. Completed transfer to CERL 3. Draft manuscript - Growth Measurements of Terrestrial Microbial Species by a Continuous-Flow Technique ------- PROJECT TITLE: Effects of Microbial Pesticides on Non-Target, Beneficial Arthropods PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Bruce Lighthart and Brian Croft INSTITUTION: CERL, OSU OBJECTIVES: To develop tests to evaluate the effects of microbial pest control agents (MPCA) on beneficial arthropods taken from five insect and mite orders. To use the above information in conjunction with a literature data base and expert information in a decision support system to help decide the risk(s) inherent in the use of potential MPCAs. OUTPUTS: 1. Optimized protocols for each of five tested insects. 2. Journal Articles: Effects of stress conditions on the infectious processes of entomopathogenic viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa. 3. Software: A user friendly microcomputer program to assist personnel in evaluating the risk(s) involved with the use of a potential MPCA. ------- PROJECT TITLE: Development and Validation of Protocols for Safety of Microbial Pest Control Agents to Avian Species PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: M. D. Knittel and A. Fairbrother INSTITUTION: Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory OBJECTIVES: The project has two objectives: (1) Development and validation of interim protocols for the intravenous, oral and respiratory inoculation of test avian species with MPCA; and (2) the development of In Vitro test protocols to determine safety of MPCA to avian species. OUTPUTS: 1. Interim protocol for the oral evaluation of safety of MPCAs to avian species. 2. Iterim protocol for the intravenous evaluation of safety of MPCAs to avian species. 3. Interim protocol for the respiratory evaluation of safety of MPCAs to avian species. Draft ready for review. 4. Journal article on In Vitro testing of MPCAs. ------- EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH ------- TITLE: Fate and effects of genetically-engineered microbes in terrestrial environments PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: Guenther Stotzky INSTITUTION: New York University STATE DATE: OBJECTIVES: June 1985 RESOURCES: $228,000 The objectives are to develop test methods and protocols for evaluating the fate, survival, and genetic stability of GEMs released to terrestrial ecosystems. The overall objectives are being achieved through analyses of growth and survival of many species of GEMs released into many soil types collected from around the world. Broth sterile and natural soils are used. Genetic stability involving the transfer of naked DNA molecules released from GEMs as well as the role of bacterial viruses in the genetic transfer processes will also be evaluated. OUTPUTS: Journal article on the survival and genetic transfer by GEMs in natural terrestrial environments. Journal article on the fate in soil of a recombinant plasmid carrying a Drosophila gene. Journal article on the transformation and transduction processes in soils which influence the genetic stability of GEMs. 11 ------- TITLE: Methods for assessing fate of genetically engineered microorganisms in soil PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS: James Tiedje and Barry Chelm INSTITUTION: Michigan State University AWARD DATE: July 85 RESOURCES: $135,000 OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to establish and verify test methods which would describe the fate and survival of GEMs in soil ecosystems. The subobjectives involve the development of a method for the quantitative recovery of GEMs from soil followed by an enmasse extraction of DNA and probing specific sequences; develop a soil microcosm that minmics the natural environment in order to soil parameters which influence survival of GEMs. OUTPUTS: Journal article on a method for the recovery of GEMs from soil for DNA probe analyses of genetically-engineered DNA sequences. Journal article on the use of a soil column technique for evaluating chemical factors influencing the fate and survival of genetically- engineered microbes in soil. 12 ------- TITLE: Evaluation of terrestrial microcosms for assessing the fate and effects of genetically engineered microorganisms on ecological processes PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Peter Van Voris INSTITUTION: Battelle Memorial Institute Northwest AWARD DATE: New Estimated June 1986 RESOURCES: $196,000 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and modify the existing EPA/OTS terrestrial microcosm test system and test protocol such that they can be used to determine the environmental fate and ecological hazards of genetically engineered organisms. The intact soil-core microcosm design closely represents natural terrestrial ecosystems and when coupled with appropriate test protocols can be used to define and limit risks associated with the deliberate release of GEM's. OUTPUTS: Validated protocol of a soil core to test the fate and effects of GEMs on ecological processes. Journal article on the use of soil cores for studying GEM effects on plants. Journal article on test methods for studying the effects of GEMs on soil/plant nutrient cycles. 13 ------- TITLE: Effect of Foreign Genes on Virulence of Pathogenic Fungi PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: 0. C. Yoder INSTITUTION: Cornell University AWARD DATE: New Estimate June 1986 RESOURCES: $226,931 OBJECTIVES: Determine the effect of foreign pathogenicity genes on the virulence, host-specificity, and/or survival of saprophytic and pathogenic filamentous fungi. Develop a test method to determine exchange of recominant DNA among fungi. Determine the effect of heterologous "neutral" genes on the virulence of a pathogen carrying this DNA in its genome. OUTPUTS: Journal article on the influence of foreign pathogenic genes on the virulence, host-specificity, and survival of saprophytic fungal species. Journal article on the effects of foreign "neutral" genes on the virulence and physiology of pathogenic fungal species. 14 ------- TITLE: Effects of released recombinant streptomyces on the microbiolgy and ecological processes of a soil ecosystem PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Donald Crawford INSTITUTION: University of Idaho AWARD DATE: New Estimated June 1986 RESOURCES: $174,130 OBJECTIVE: To develop protocols for assessing the effects of gram positive bacteria on ecological processes in the soil. Determine the effects of genetically altered Streptomyces on native gram positive organisms in the soil. Determine whether the Strepytomyces recombinants effect major ecological processes with an emphasis on elucidating their long-term effects on the cycling of organic carbon. OUTPUTS: Journal article on the persistence and fate of recombinant lignin bio- degrading Streptomyces released to terrestrial ecosystems. Test method for evaluating effects of recombinant lignin biodegraders on the cycling of carbon in terrestrial environments. 15 ------- TITLE: Effects «f genetically-engineered microbes on ecological processes in soil. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Guenther Stotzky INSTITUTION: New York University AWARD DATE: OBJECTIVES: New Estimated June 1986 RESOURCES: $270,775 Develop test methods based upon enzymatic, nutritional, physiological, functional, and taxonomic criteria for evaluating the potential effects of GEMs on ecological processes. Determine which, if any, enzymatic assays are sensitive, economical, and convenient for detecting effects from GEMs; develop a series of physiological and nutritional tests for indexing microbial species diversity effects of GEMs; evaluate various broad, functional kinetic activities such as nitrification, respiration, dinitrogen fixation, etc., which may be influenced following the release of GEMs into an ecosystem. OUTPUTS: Journal article on the influence of GEMs released into terrestrial ecosystems on enzymatic processes in soil. Journal article on the microbial species diversity index to detect potential influences of GEMs on terrestrial microflora. Journal article on series of test to measure the effects of GEMs on key functional processes occurring in soil. Special report on an index of appropriate measurements for evaluating the effects of GEMs on biochemical and taxonomic features of the terrestrial ecosystem. 16 ------- TITLE: Impact of energy controlled survival on the stability of plasmid DNA in genetically-engineered microorganisms. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Richard Morita INSTITUTION: Oregon State University AWARD DATE: New Estimated June 1986 OBJECTIVES: RESOURCES: $199,917 Determine if energy-controlled survival has an impact on the maintenance of foreign (engineered) DNA, especially plasmid DNA, in prokaryotic cells. Determine whether the loss of plasmid DNA is a generalized phenomenon common to many candidate GEM species and whether this loss of plasmid DNA is related to plasmid in group, size, and metabolic functions encoded; determine how long a GEM must be starved before loss of plasmid; determine the relative relationship between the net available nutritional energy in a given terrestrial enviroment and the loss of the plasmidS; what relative energy level is necessary for the maintenance of plasmid DNA molelcules; is there any relationship between cell deatth and plasmid loss; ascertain whether there are correlations between nutrition and physiological conditions and loss of plasmid DNA. OUTPUTS: Journal article on the relationship between the available energy in the terrestrial environment and the persistence of GEMs. Journal article on the maintenance of recorabinant DNA in GEMs as a function of plasmid size, function, and available energy in the ecosystem. Journal article on the morphological changes during long-term starvation survival and the loss of plasmid DNA. 17 ------- TITLE: Evaluation of novel methods for detection of recombinant DNA in the soil environment PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Betty Olson INSTITUTION: University of California, Irvine AWARD DATE: New Estimate June 1986 RESOURCES: $198,775 OJECTIVE: Develop a generalized test method for optimal detection enumeration of GEMs in terrestrial ecosystems. The objective will be acieved through an investigation of the efficacy or riboprobes, nonradioactive probe analysis, direct detection of R-DNA in soil, and a validation of these methods in a terrestrial microcosm. OUTPUTS: Journal article comparing conventional DNA probes with riboprobes in the detection of GEMs in terrestrial environments. Journal article on a novel technique for the direct detection of R-DNA in soil samples. Journal article on validation of new methods for detecting GEMs in a terrestrial ecosystem. 18 ------- TITLE: Ice nucleation and bioluminescence as sensitive tools for detection PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Trevor Suslow INSTITUTION: Advanced Genetic Sciences AWARD DATE: New Estimate June 1986 RESOURCES: $165,393 OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of using the bioluminescent (lux) gene and ice nucleation active gene (INA) as markers to detect genetically engineered microorganisms in terrestrial environments. The system, if successful, will allow us to rapidly, conveniently and sensitively assess the fate of GEMs in the environment. OUTPUTS: Method to incorporate the Lux and INA genes into GEMs for the purpose of detection within a controlled environment. Journal article on the use of lux genes in the detection of GEMs released to plant roots. Journal article on the fate of Pseudomonas in a terrestrial microcosm as measured by lux genes and INA gene expression. 19 ------- TITLE: Determination of the fate and effects of released recombinantly generated microorganisms and their parental strains compared with measurements made in contained environments PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Steven Lindow INSTITUTION: University of California, Berkeley AWARD DATE: New Estimated June 1986 RESOURCES: $196,235 OBJECTIVE: To determine the fate of introduced microorganisms on treated plants, soil and other habitats following application of such organisms at concentrations used in microcosm studies and used in typical release scenarios in the field. To determine the effects of variable inoculum concentrations of introduced microorganisms on population size and changes in associate micro and macroflora on plants and in the soil. To measure spacial flux of microorganisms from sites of introduction and determine if such measurements predict resultant spacial distributions of organisms on adjacent plants or in habitats. Compare field behavior of wild-type and in vitro constructed strains under variable biological and physical environments in the field. OUTPUTS: Test method for estimating fate of GEMs released to plant surfaces. Journal article on observations on the fate and spatial distributions of GEMs released to plants and soil environments. Journal article on a comparison of survival, population densities and fate of GEMs released into microcosms and into the field. 20 ------- EPA SCIENTISTS ------- Ramon J. Seidler Research Mlcrobiologist Team Leader Microbial Ecology/Terrestrial Biotechnology Program EDUCATION EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Ph.D. — University of California, Davis B.S. — California State University, Northridge 1968 1964 Research Microbiologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch 1984-Present 1970-1984 Full, Associate, Assistant Professor Department of Microbiology Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Microbial ecology and genetics of pathogens, indicator organisms. Sabbatical Leave 1978-1979 University of Maryland with R. R. Colwell Molecular systematics, ecology marine bacteria Postdoctoral Fellow National Institute of Health Univeristy of Texas M. 0. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute Houston, Texas New methods for molelcular systematics American Society for Microbiology American Academy for Microbiology Society of Sigma Xi Phi Kappa Phi Gamma Sigma Delta 1968-1970 21 ------- EDUCATION EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Anne Fair-brother Research Biologist Ph.D. — University of Wisconsin, Veterinary Science 1985 M.S. — University of Wisconsin, Veterinary Sciences 1982 D.V.M.— University of California, Davis 1980 1976 B.S. — University of California, Davis Wildlife Biology 1986-Present Research Biologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Define endpoints resulting from exposures of nontarget avian species to microbial pest control agents; develop assays to detect immunological responses of wildlife to toxic chemicals. Graduate Research Assistant 1980-1985 University of Wisconsin Interactions of pathogens, toxicants, and temperature and their effects on growth, reproduction, metabolism and immune responses to deer mice. Reserach Assistant 1976-1980 University of California, Davis Ectoparasite reinfestations and annual cycles on deer mice. Laboratory Technician 1972-1976 University of California, Davis School of Veterinary Medicine Bovine transplacental transmission of IBR & BVD viruses; antibiotic transmission in milk; genetics of hoof overgrowth in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. American Society of Mammalogy American Veterinary Medical Association Association of Wildlife Veterinarians Wildlife Disease Association 22 ------- Charles W. Hendricks Research Mlcrobiologist EDUCATION EXPERIENCE Ph.D. — Colorado State University, Microbiology M.S. — Colorado State University, Microbiology B.S. — Colorado State University, Bacteriology 1966 1964 1962 Research Microbiologist 1985-Present Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Effect of xenobiotic chemicals on soil microorganisms. Visiting Scientist 1985 Department of Plant and Soil Biology University of California, Berkeley Research on mlcrobial growth in soil Environmental Scientist 1980-1985 Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research Washington, D.C. Research planning for toxics and pesticides. Microbiologist 1974-1980 Office of Drinking Water/EPA Washington, D.C. Sanitary microbiology regulations development. Assistant Professor 1967-1974 Department of Microbiology University of Georgia, Athens Microbial ecology of sanitary microorganisms. Microbiologist 1966-1967 NAS-NRC Postdoctoral Fellow Ft. Detrick, Maryland Regulatory mechanisms of toxin synthesis by Staphylococcus PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Society for Microbiology American Academy for Microbiology Sigma Xi 23 ------- Bruce Lighthart Research Microbiology EDUCATION EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Ph.D. — University of Washington, Seattle M.S. — San Diego State University B.S. — San Diego State University 1967 1961 1959 1978-Present Research Microbiologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Research concerned with pollutant effects on soil microbiota; effects of microbiological pesticides on non-target, beneficial insects; airborne genetically engineered microorganisms. Director and Assistant Professor 1969-1973 Institute for Freshwater Studies Department of Biology Western Washington State University, Bellingham Research on the limnology of Lake Whatcom, and survival of airborne bacteria in urban air pollutants; and teaching oceanography, microbial biology, limnology and biochemistry. Assistant Professor of Applied Microbiology University of Washington, Seattle Research and teaching of microbiology. 1967-1969 American Association for the Advancement of Science (member-at-large, Pacific Station) Sigma Xi American Society for Microbilogy Society for General Microbiology American Society for Limnology and Oceanography Plankton Society of Japan Water Pollution Control Association Air Pollution Control Association Society for Invertebrate Pathology 24 ------- John L. Armstrong Molecular Ecologist EDUCATION Ph.D. — University of Washington, Microbiology 1968 B.A. — University of California, Microbiology 1964 EXPERIENCE Molecular Ecologist 1985-Present Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Research scientist in Biotechnology Group Research Associate 1983-1985 Oregon State University With Dr. G. S. Beaudreau; studied molecular biology of bacterial toxins. Instructor in Microbiology Oregon State University Team-taught one term of introductory microbiology 1983 Research Associate 1980-1983 Oregon State University With Dr. R. J. Seidler; studied antibiotic resistant bacteria in water. Development Disabilities Services Coordinator 1978-1979 Medford, Oregon Coordinated services for mentally disabled people Instructor and Director 1971-1978 Clifton, Arizona School and workshop for mentally disabled people. Assistant Professor of Biology Grinnell College, Iowa Lecturer in Biology Reed College, Oregon 1969-1971 1968-1969 25 ------- Paul T. Rygiewicz Reearch EcologistS EDUCATION EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Ph.D. — University of Washington Tree/Plant Physiology M.S. — University of California, Berkeley Forestry/Forest Products B.S. — University of Illinois Forestry Research Ecologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Plant and soil microbial ecophysiology of xenobiotic chemicals Assist. Research Soil Microbiologis Dept. of Plant and Soil Biology University of California, Berkeley Soil microbial ecophysiology in forest and oak/grassland and ecosystems Research Associate Centre National de Recherches Forestieres Nancy, France Biochemistry of nitrogen assimilation in mycorrhizal fungi Research Associate College of Forest Resources University of Washington Mineral nutrient uptake of coniferous species Research Assistant Dept. of Forestry University of California, Berkeley Ecophysiology of xylem formation 1983 1976 1974 1985-Present 1984-1985 1983-1984 1979-1983 1978-1979 1974-1976 Research Wood Technologist ITT Rayonier, Inc. Wood quality related to pulp and paper quality American Society of Plant Physiology Ecological Society of America Phytochemical Society of America American Association for the Advancement of Science Sigma Xi, Xi Sigma Pi, Gamma Sigma Delta 26 ------- Martin D. Knittel Microbiologist EDUCATION Ph.D. — Oregon State University, Microbiology M.S. — Oregon State University Microbiology B.S. — Willamette University EXPERIENCE Microbiologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch 1965 1962 1955 1980-Present 1974-1980 Microbiologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Western Fish Toxicology Research on stress induced disease in salmonid fishes Research Microbiologist Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Waste Treatment Branch Research on coliforms in pulp mill effluents 1971-1974 Senior Engineer 1969-1971 Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, California Research on survival of microorganisms in space Microbiologist 1966-1969 Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Eutrophication Branch Research on development of an algal assay test for eutrophic lakes. Senior Bacteriologist 1965-1966 Norwich Pharmacal Co. Norwich, New York Research on mode of action of nitrofurian compounds on bacteria. Research Assistant 1963-1965 Department of Microbiology Oregon State University Research on generic validness among members of genus streptococcus Aquatic Biologist Oregon Fish Commission Clackamas, Oregon Research on diseases of fish 1962-1963 27 ------- Aquatic Biologist 1962-1963 Oregon Fish Commission Clackamas, Oregon Research on diseases of fish Teaching Assistant 1959-1961 Department of Microbiology Oregon State University Teaching of laboratory sections of General Microbiology Medical Laboratory Technician 1958-1959 Doctor's Clinic Salem, Oregon Routine midical lab procedures Medical Reserach Lab Technician 1956-1957 U.S. Army Medical Research Lab Technician support to G.I. physiology research lab Bacteriologist 1955-1956 Oregon Department of Agriculture Division of FOod and Dairy Salem, Oregon Bacterial counts on foods for compliance with state regulations. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Sigma Xi Phi Sigma New York Academy of Science American Association for Science American Society for Microbiology 28 ------- L. Arlene Porteous Biological Laboratory Technician EDUCATION B.S. — Seattle Pacific University, Microbiology 1967 EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Biological Laboratory Technician 1985-Present Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Research technician testing and evaluating the stability of DNA transfer in environmental related samples and providing analytical support for biotechnology projects in evaluating genetically engineered microorganisms and their effect on the environment. Research Assistant 1984-1985 Oregon State University Animal Science Department Research microbiologist testing and evaluating the microbial quality and stability of liquefied fish protein, a high protein supplement used in animal feed. Microbiolgist 1974-1980 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Los Angeles District Office Analytical microbiologist testing and evaluating the microbial quality of food, drugs and cosmetics. Sampling and testing interstate and import samples for the presence of microbiological pathogens and bacterial toxins. Microbiologist 1968-1974 U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Center for Antibiotic Analysis Analytical microbiologist testing and determining antibiotic potency levels in certifiable human and veterinarian drug products. Evaluating and testing methods for determining antibiotic residues in animal feeds, tissues, serum and food for human consumption. American Society for Microbiology 29 ------- David W. Schmedding Analytical Chemist EDUCATION B.A. — California State University, Chemistry 1969 EXPERIENCE Analytical Chemist 1983-Present Northrop Services, Inc. Presently involved in analytical methods development and feed preparation and treatment level verification for toxicants used in LC5Q> 1.059, induced tolerance, and reproductive tests both at CERL and WFTS. Research Chemist 1970-1983 Department of Agricultural Chemistry Oregon State University With a variety of pesticide and industrial chemical research projects. Areas of research include nuclear magnetic resonance studies on the binding of toxicants to biomembranes, physical property determinations for chemicals of environmental concern, determination of adsorption isotherms for various PCBs and pesticides on sand, soil, and clay surfaces, and correlations of physical properties with bioaccumulation. Developed a method to measure the evaporative loss rate of aerial agriculture sprays as modified by various adjuvants. Work with toxicants led to an involvement in a U.S.-USSR joint research project on substituted aniline compounds and their mammalian toxicity as related to physical constants. A cooperative research project with the University of Miami School of Medicine led to the solution of the delayed neuro- toxicological symptomology and resultant deaths of victims of accidentalD ingestions of high partition coefficient organophosphate insecticides. The interest in organophosphates led to the development of a Knudsen effusion apparatus for determining vapor pressures of "non-volatile" compounds of interest for use in environmental models on bioaccumulation. Research Chemist 1969-1970 Friden Research Where work involved computerized formulation and preselection of fluorescent inks, intrinsic viscosity, UV quenching, and volatility determinations with subsequent plant production and screening. 30 ------- Jerome J. Wagner Associate Scientist/Chemist EDUCATION B.A. — Linfield College, McMinnville, Oregon 1967 EXPERIENCE Associate Scientist/Chemist 1977-Present Toxics/Pesticides Branch (IAG) Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Ames Laboratory (DOE) Iowa State University Ames, Iowa Responsible for the chemical analyses of major, trace and ultra-trace levels of metals in environmental samples, using Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy at CERL. Research Assistant 1968-1977 Oregon State University School of Oceanography Radioecology Department Responsible for radiochemical analyses using gamma-ray spectroscopy and trace metal analyses using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry of ecological samples. Other responsibilities included operation and maintenance of computers and supervising a small chemical analytical laboratory. Sanitarian II 1967-1968 Yamhill County Health Department McMinnville, Oregon Public health official with duties such as inspecting various public facilities to assure compliance with State of Oregon public health related statues. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for Applied Spectroscopy 31 ------- Suean Ott Research Associate EDUCATION Corvallis High School 1972 LBCC - Certified Assistant Laboratory Animal Tech. 1973 LBCC - Certified Laboratory Animal Tech. 1977 EXPERIENCE Associate Scientist with NSI June 1982-Present (IAG) Corvallis Environmental Research Lab Toxics/Pesticides Branch Ames Laboratory (DOE) Iowa State University Ames, Iowa Responsible for chemical analyses of major, trace and ultra-trace metals in the environment using Induc- tively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy. Assistant Laboratory Tech at OSU June 1972-March 1982 32 ------- Katharine A. Harbour Biological Aid EDUCATION B.S. — Oregon State University, Microbiology 1981-1986 — Blue Mountain Community College, Medical 1978-1980 EXPERIENCE Biological Aid 1985-Present Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Media preparation, quality assurance tests, bacterial plasmid extractions, bacterial mating experiments and growth curves. Columbia Medical Laboratories 1984-1985 Drawing venous blood samples, Hematology and Urinalysis testing, glassware cleaning, receptionist work and miscellaneous paperwork. El Centre Community Hospital Phlebotomist/Lab Assistant Calexico Hospital Phlebotomist/Lab Assistant OSU Microbiology Department Microbiology Lab Assistant Hermiston Veterinary Clinic Veterinary Assistant 1982-1983 1981 1978-1979 33 ------- Valerie J. Prince Laboratory Assistant EDUCATION Oregon State University BS expected June 1986 Senior in Microbiology EXPERIENCE Laboratory Assistant January 1986-Present Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Prepares and provides media, buffers, and other microbiological materials necessary for experiments performed by the Biotechnolgy Team PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATES American Society of Medical Technologists 34 ------- Karen J. Armstrong Biological Lab Aid EDUCATION B.S. — Oregon State University, Microbiology March 1986 EXPERIENCE Biological Lab Aid May 1985-Present Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch (1) Responsible for the preparation of media, buffers, and solutions necessary for environment research; (2) Assist in the evaluation of four common methods to evaluate conjugal DNA transfer utilizing plamids from several incompatability groups with laboratory strains and environmental isolates as recipients. 35 ------- VISITING SCIENTISTS ------- Michael V. Walter Post Doctoral Research Associate EDUCATION Ph.D. — University of North Dakota M.A. — St. Cloud State University B.A. — Northland College EXPERIENCE Post Doctoral Research Associate Corvallis Environental Research Lab Toxics/Pesticides Branch Biotechnology Team Teaching Assistant University of North Dakota Teaching Assistant St. Cloud State Univ. Associate Director of Admissions Northland College PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS North Dakota Academy of Science American Society of Microbiology 1985 1982 1978 1985-Present 1982-1985 1980-1982 1978-1980 37 ------- Alan R. Barker Research Associate EDUCATION EXPERIENCE Ph.D. — University of Utah, Biochemistry B.S. — University of Utah, Biology B.S. — University of Utah, Chemistry Research Associate Oregon State University and Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Research scientist investigating the enzymology, regulation and genetic stability of 2,4-D degradation. 1982 1976 1976 1985-Present Research Associate 1983-1985 Oregon State University Department of Nitrogen Fixation Research scientist involved in characterization of hydgogenase in R. japonicum and E.coli. Research Associate 1982-1983 Washington State University Department of Agronomy and Soils Research scientist responsible for purification and characterization of NADPH-nitrate reductase in barley. Graduate Research Assistant 1977-1982 University of Utah Department of Biology Graduate research in the enzymology and physical properties of nitrogenase in A. vinelandii. 38 ------- Guy R. Knudsen EDUCATION EXPERIENCE Ph.D. — Cornell University, Plant Pathology M.S. — Cornell University, Plant Pathology B.S. — University of New Hampshire, Forestry 1984 1981 1978 1985-Present Associate Reserach Scientist (Post-Doc) New York University and Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Toxics/Pesticides Branch Biotechnology Group: Fate and Genetic Stability of Recombinant Bacteria Research Associate 1983-1985 USDA-ARS Tobacco Research Lab Oxford, NC Biocontrol and computer simulation modeling of foliar diseases of peanuts and tobacco. Research Associate Department of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Phytopathological Society 1983-1985 39 ------- APPENDIX ------- 28 January 1986 Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on Predatory Mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)* INTRODUCTION Registration of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MPCAs) under Section Three of the Fungicide Insecticide Rodenticide Act requires that the susceptibility of nontarget species be tested. Among nontarget species important in diverse agricultural crop systems are predatory mites in the family Phytoseiidae. These mites are important predators of spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae). While the family Phytoseiidae is estimated to include ca. 1000 species, there are 3 species that are most common and representative of biological control agents used in agricultural cropping systems in the U.S.: Amblyseius fallacis (Garman), Metaseiulus occidental is (Nesbitt), and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot. This document will outline proposed methods of evaluating the effects of MPCA's on predators. These methods will have to be adapted to specific microbial agents, depending on the mode of action of the MPCA. In addition, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results of such tests in predicting the effects of the MPCAs under field conditions. Precise correla- tion in dosage relationships between laboratory and field effects are rare. Laboratory data are usually obtained under optimal conditions so that complete * Disclaimer: This interim protocol was developed on the basis of current knowledge of testing the toxicity of chemical pesticides to the Phytoseiidae. Modifications may be required as experience in testing microbial pest control agents is acquired. 1 ------- coverage is attained, prey are provided as needed, and other environmental impacts such as UV irradiation and rain are excluded. Thus, laboratory data may overestimate or underestimate pathogenicity. Impacts under field condi- tions are easiest to predict in the extremes, i.e., if the MPCA is highly pathogenic or nearly nonpathogenic in the laboratory at the proposed field rates. MPCAs are likely to be directed against both insect and spider mite pests. MPCAs could, therefore, have both direct and indirect effects on predatory mites. Direct effects occur by contact, ingestion, or through systemic effects from feeding on infected prey (spider mites). Indirect mortality can occur in the MPCA is more pathogenic to the spider mite prey than to the predators since these three speices are obligatory predators. Lack of prey results in preda- tory death or dispersal from the site. Thus, classical serial dilutions of the pathogen to produce LCso determinations with the predatory mite(s) may not be particularly useful if the pathogenic effects is due to indirect mortality. Mites in the family Phytoseiidae are primarily predaceous in habit, although some species will feed and reproduce on pollen. Sometimes predators probe leaf tissue for moisture but none is known to reproduce or develop on plant tissue. Ingestion of prey involves preoral digestion and sucking the liquid foods into the predator's digestive tract. Phytoseiids lack eyes, and, as chelicerate arthropods, have chelicerae and palps for mouthparts. Their fundamental body organization includes the gnathosoma (the mouth-bearing portion of the body) and the idiosoma. Phytoseiids have 4 pair of legs as nymphs and adults, but only 3 pair as larvae. The life cycle is: egg, larva, protonymph, deutonymph, and adult. At 25°C it takes about one week to complete the life cycle. Phytoseiids are dimorphic, with males about 2/3 the size of females. The sex ratio is commonly about 2.5 females to 1 male, but may vary. 2 ------- Mating is required before egg deposition occurs. Pregnant (gravid) adult females are commonly used for testing; when well fed, females deposit approxi- mately 2 eggs per day. Eggs are oval and hatch within 3-4 days at 25°C. Larvae (with 3 pair of legs) molt to protonymphs within about 24 hours. The three recommended phytoseiid species feed on a variety of spider mite species, but all do well on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. All stages (eggs, larvae, nymphs and adults) of T. urticae are consumed by the active stages of these phytoseiids. Good color photographs of M_. occidental is females and eggs, as well as of spider mites, are presented in: "Grape Pest Management," Publ. 4105, Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, 312 pp., 1981. All three phytoseiid species have strains which have acquired resistance to various insecticides and fungicides. No acquired resistance to MPCAs is known in the family, although a rickettsial-like disease and two viruses have been found in M_. occidental is. The fungal pathogen Hirsutella thompsom'i is pathogenic to spider mites, and to the citrus rust mite (a mite of the family Enophyidae). It is reported to be pathogenic to predatory mites in the field, although no laboratory assays have been conducted to confirm this. So, it is possible that certain MPCAs will be directly pathogenic to M_. occidental is and to other phytoseiids. v TEST PROCEDURES A. Summary of Tests: The tests are designed to determine if direct or indirect mortality results from exposure to MPCAs. Test 1 assays direct pathogenic effects on adult female predators and impact on their fecundity. Test 2 assays survival of immature predatory mites, another test of direct mortality. Test 3 assays 3 ------- the effects on spider mite prey, and this test is most important if the MPCA appears nonpathogenic to the predators it assays for indirect pathogenicity in Test 1 and 2. The test species recommended is either Metaseiulus occidental is or Amblyseius fallacis. These two species are preferred because they are key predators in diverse agricultural corps, and because they are commercially available. £. persimilis is commercially available but very difficult to contain in test arenas (unless caged) because of its high rate of activity. If one species is to be tested, M_. occidental is is recommended because it is readily available, has a wide crop range, and is easy to rear and test. There is no reason at this time to believe that different species of phytoseiids differ in their suscpetibility to MPCAs, but comparative tests have not been done. [M_. occidental is (and their prey, T. urticae) can be obtained from commercial sources such as Integrated Orchard Management, 3524 West Fairview Avenue, Visalia, California 93277 (209)625-5199; and Biotactics, Inc., 7765 Lakeside Drive, Riverside, California 92509 (714)685-7681.] Test 1: Gravid females of M_. occidentalis are placed on untreated bean leaf discs provided with the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) as prey. The MPCA is applied and mortality of the predator is assessed after 48 hrs. If no mortality occurs, monitoring should continue up to 7 days post treatment. The number of eggs produced by M_. occidentalis is counted after 48 and 120 hrs. Eggs should be smashed or removed during counts. Initial doses used should utilize the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, 10X and 1/10X the proposed field rate, as well as a water control. If mortality to adult females occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established (see Methods for details). Test 2; The second test involves placing gravid M_. occidentalis females on bean leaf discs provided with all stages of the two-spotted spider mite as 4 ------- prey, removing the predator females after 24 hr, treating the leaf discs (and predator eggs) with the MPCA and observing whether the predator eggs deposited hatch and develop successfully to the adult stage. (Eggs hatch at 25°C within 48-72 hrs after deposition. Adults should be present within 7 days.) Test 3; Indirect toxicity is assessed by recording the effect of the MPCA at the field rate, 1/10X, and 10X the field rate on all stages of the two- spotted spider mite prey. Since phytoseiids require prey to survive and reproduce, high toxicity to the prey can result in starvation of the predator or lead to dispersal out of the area in search of food. B. Test Species: Either M_. occidental is or £. fallacis are suitable for testing. Both have been used for testing toxicity of chemicals and therefore an extensive knowl- edge of laboratory rearing is available. MPCAs obtained from the manufacturer should be tested in the formulation expected to be used under commercial conditions. Doses should be made up fresh the day of the tests using distilled water. Ideally, an inhouse colony of M_. occidental is or A. fallacis will be established for use in MPCA testing. To maintain predator colonies, prey must also be maintained, preferably the two-spotted spider mite, J. urticae. Stock colonies of T. urticae should be maintained on bean plants grown in vermiculite or a mixture of soil and vermiculite to which a complete fertilizer is added. J. urticae should be reared in a different area from where the predators are reared to avoid contamination, and personnel should not re-enter the area where T. urticae are reared after handling predators. M_. occidental is colonies can be cultured on paraffin-coated black paper discs placed on water-soaked cotton. Small tufts of cotton provide a site for 5 ------- egg deposition by females. J. urticae can be added as needed by brushing spider mites from the foliage of the bean plants, using either a mite brushing machine (available from Leedom Engineering, Route 1, Box 325, Twain Harte, California 95383) or by brushing individual leaves with a soft camel's hair paint brush 1-3 inches wide. M_. occidental is females used for a test should be the same age, randomly selected and placed on the test bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaf discs. Numbers tested for each test dose should consist of a minimum of 40, but 100 is necessary if there is substantial variability. Usually, 5 or 10 females are placed on a single bean leaf disc. C. Test Conditions: Bean leaf discs should be cut from healthy, green foliage using a cork borer, sized 12 to 15. The leaf disc should be placed, bottom side up, on a petri dish or plastic sandwich box filled with absorbent cotton soaked with distilled water. Leaf discs should be held at 25°C at 50-75% R.H. under a long daylength (16-18 hrs light). JT. urticae should be provided for predators in . tests 1 and 2 by using leaves already infested to make leaf discs. Test 3 involves treating bean leaf discs infested with all stages of T. urticae; no predators are added. D. Number of Predators in Treatment Groups: The number of test predators per treatment rate should be no less than 40 and preferably 100, with the same number in each control group. Usually, 5 or 10 females are placed on each leaf disc for tests 1 and 2. After females have been removed from discs in test 2, the number of predator eggs present should be counted and the location of each egg marked by placing a dot of India ink 6 ------- near it to identify the location so that eggs that fail to hatch can be iden- tified. A total of 40-100 eggs per test dose should be evaluated. E. Preparation and Quantification of Test Materials: The MPCA should be prepared using the manufacturer's directions. Ini- tially, rates tested should include the field rate, 1/10 the field rate, and 10 times the field rate. If mortality is observed at these rates in test 1 or 2 then a dose response should be conducted using at least 4 treatment rates and a water control. If no mortality is observed in tests 1, 2, or 3 at the initial rates, the value of a dose response is dubious and need not be performed. F. Application Methods; Phytoseiid mites and spider mites have been tested using a variety of application methods including slide dip, leaf spray, and leaf dip. In some tests predatory mites are placed on the dried residues; in other cases they are sprayed using a Potter spray tower (available from Burkhard Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Woodcock Hill, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, WD3 1P5, England) or other spray device. In general, application of the spray to the predators after being placed on bean leaf discs with their prey provides the most useful information as 1t approximates the field condition. If a Potter spray tower is not available to apply the MPCA, an inexpensive alternative Involves the use of a propellent spray apparatus such as Crown* Spray-tool power pak (Crown Indus- trial Products Co., Hebron, Illinois 60034), which contains a chlorofluoro- carbon under pressure (62 Ibs at 70°F). Separate plastic tubes and bottles should be kept for each MPCA used to reduce the likelihood of contamination of the holding container with previously-used MPCA. The leaf discs should be sprayed to drip. Place the discs in a vertical position, hold the spray power ------- pak about 12 inches away from the leaf discs and spray for approximately 5 seconds to obtain a complete coverage. When performing any of the microbial procedures used in this protocol, it is redommended that the Class II contain- ment procedures be followed as specified in "Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories" (Eds. J. H. Birchardson and W. Emmett Berkley, 1984, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia). G. Post Treatment Observations: Test 1; Adult predator females should be evaluated after 48 hrs for mortality; numbers of eggs deposited by the females should be determined by counts under a dissecting microscope after 48 and 120 hrs. Eggs should be removed so the next count records new eggs deposited. The number of females that are absent or have run off the disc should be recorded, but these data typically are included as "dead" when determining dose response data. Death is assumed if the female is unable to move when gently touched with a fine brush. In some cases, mortality can't be determined within 48 hrs and observa- tions should be continued every 24 hrs up to 7 days subsequent to the test. After 7 days, the quality of the bean leaf discs is poor, and reliable data are not obtained. Test 2: Tests involving predator eggs (deposited by gravid females within a 24-hr period) should be monitored 72 hrs after treatment to determine the number of eggs that have hatched and the number of larvae that are dead, alive, absent, or off the disc. Such counts should be repeated until it is clear from the control discs that no more eggs will hatch. Then, the discs should be held until the larvae have reached adulthood on the control discs. Determine the number of adult males and females present on each disc. If the MPCA has 8 ------- affected devlopmental rate, this may be measured by comparing the number of adults on control discs with the number present on treated discs. Predators should become adults within 7 days at 25°C. General: Leaf discs containing both adult and immature predators should be checked daily to be sure sufficient ]_. urticae prey are available. Preda- tors will die or run off the discs if prey becomes scarce. Additional prey can be added to the discs as needed by brushing on small quantities. Test 3: Check the discs with ]_. urticae every 48 hrs for one week; determine whether all stages are alive and whether new eggs have been depos- ited. Continue observations for 7 days; the quality of the leaf tissue will deteriorate after that so that spider mites may disperse or die due to poor leaf quality. H. Reporting: Test data should be recorded as described above. Also included should be notes on behavioral changes observed, such as a tendency for treated predators to be excessively active. Data submitted should include the following: 1. Name of the test, sponsor, test laboratory, study director, principal investigator and dates of testing. 2. A detailed description of the test MPCA, including the formulation and concentration. Include the type of dilutions carried out. 3. Detailed information about species of predators used in the test, their scientific name, source (supplier or inhouse colony), and history of any indigenous disease, if known. Age of test subjects, test conditions (temperature, lighting level and duration, and relative humidity) should be included. ------- 4. Describe the test substrates, dimensions, number of test predators per leaf disc, and number of replicates per dilution of MPCA. 5. The percentage of test subjects dead at each dose after each observation period should be reported. 6. If a dose response test is conducted, the statistical test used should be reported (logit or probit). Minimal data reported would include 1059 and LCgo with their confidence intervals, the slope (and confidence interval) and intercept. 7. Any deviation from this test protocol should be reported, as well as anything unusual about the test such as temperature fluctuations, disease problems in the control predators, etc. 10 ------- USEFUL REFERENCES Phytoseiid Biology and Ecology Hoy, M. A., Ed. 1982. Recent Advances in Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae, Div. Agric. Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Publ. 3287, 92 pp. McMurtry, J. A., C. B. Huffaker, and M. van de Vrie. 1970. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: A review. I. Tetryanychid enemies: their biological characters and the impact of spray practices. Hilgardia 40(11):331-390. Krantz, G. W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology, second edition, Oregon State University Book Stores, Corvallis. Microorganisms Associated with the Phytoseiidae Hess, R. T., and M. A. Hoy. 1982. Microorganisms associated with the spider mite predator Metaseiulus (=Typhlodromus) occidental is; Electron micro- scope observations. J. Invert. Pathol. 40:98-106. Sutakova, G., and F. Ruttgen. 1978. Rickettsiella phytoseiuli and virus like particles in Phytoseiulus persimilis (Gamasoidea: Phytoseiidae) mites. Acta Virol. 22:333-336. Microorganisms Associated with Mites in General Surges, H. D., and N. W. Hussey, Eds. 1971. Microbial Control of Insects and Mites, Academic Press, London. 11 ------- Krieg, A. 1968. Effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis exotoxin on Tetranychus telarious (Acarina: Tetranychidae). J. Invert. Pathol. 12:478-480. Reed, D. K. 1981. Control of mites by non-occluded viruses, pp. 472-431. In: Surges, H. D. Microbial Control of Pest and Plant Diseases 1970- 1980, Academic Press, NY. Steinhaus, E. A. 1949. Principles of Insect Pathology. McGraw Hill, New York, 757 pp. 12 ------- 7 February 1986 Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on the Common Green Lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)1 Introduction Registration of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MPCAs) under Subsection M of the Fungicide, Insecticide, and Rodenticide Act as amended (PL 92-516, 94-140, 95-396; Sept. 30, 1978) requires that the susceptibility of nontarget species be tested. Among nontarget insect species beneficial in field and orchard crop systems are predatory Neuroptera. Because of its worldwide distribution, high densities in orchards and field crops, wide prey range, and availability from commercial sources, the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) is an important species for laboratory study. This document outlines proposed methods of testing the susceptibility of this predator to MPCAs. Because the lacewing 1s a nontarget organism, it is not likely to be killed by the MPCA, and so a classic serial dilution of the pathogen is not likely to produce a classic LDso, LDgn,, and straight slope of mortality. Instead, the researcher simply may have to show that a range of concentrations approximating field rates does not significantly alter the - survival, reproduction, and predatory capabilities of the lacewing. 1 Disclaimer: This interim protocol was developed on the basis of current knowledge of testing the toxicity of chemical pesticides to the Phytoseiidae. Modifications may be required as experience in testing microblal pest control agents is acquired. ------- These methods will have to be adapted to specific mlcrobial agents, depending upon the MPCA mode of action. Interpretations of such test results in predicting the effects of the MPCAs under field conditions require caution. Precise correlations in dosage relationships between laboratory and field pathogenicity are rare. Laboratory data are usually obtained under optimal conditions: complete coverage is attained, prey are provided as needed, and other environmental impacts such as UV irradiation and rain are excluded. Thus, laboratory data usually overestimate pathogenicity. Impacts under field conditions are easiest to predict in the extremes, i.e., if the MPCA is highly pathogenic or mildly pathogenic in the laboratory at the proposed field rates. MPCAs are not likely to be directed against the common green lacewing since its prey are found in completely different taxonomic groups. The lace- wing is in the order Neuroptera, while its prey includes mites (Acarina), aphids, whitefly, and psyllids (Homoptera), and eggs and small caterpillar larvae (Lepidoptera). Since lacewing eggs and pupae are not readily penetrated by chemicals, they are rarely affected by chemical pesticides (reviewed by Bigler, 1984; Grafton-Cardwell and Hoy, 1985). Thus, eggs and pupae are not likely to be significant targets of MPCAs. The adult £. carnea are nectar feeders, non- predacious, and disperse widely. Since they do not stay in one place, contact infection is probably minimal; the greatest infective potential would occur with MPCA ingestion during feeding on plant nectar. The primary stage affected both by contact and oral infection would be the predacious £. carnea larvae, which would be resting on and searching treated plant tissue and feeding on infected prey. Ingestion of prey involves piercing the integument of the prey and sucking liquid foods. Larvae may also occasionally feed on nectar and water. Additional pathogenic effects for the larval stage are those which are 2 ------- sublethal or more long-term and result in decreased predation rates as larvae, slower development, Incomplete pupation, unsuccessful emergence as adults, and lowered fecundity and fertility. Various life stages of £. carnea have been tested with several MPCAs to detect the adverse effects of immediate contact exposure as well as those of long-term exposure. Suter (1978) and Franz et^ al_. (1980) treated a glass plate with a suspension of Bacillus thuringiensis and examined feeding rates of the larvae and fertility of adults resulting from larvae reared on this plate. IJ. thuringiensis had little or no effect on either of these parameters. Wilkinson iet^ al_. (1975) treated filter paper with a suspension of JJ. thuringiensis or NPV of Heliothis and placed larvae and adults in petri dish cages with the treated paper. No significant mortality resulted from this contact exposure. Since the target host may have to feed to become infected with viral and bacterial MPCAs, it is likely that the predator must also ingest the MPCA to become infected. Therefore, simple treatment of the substrate and measurements of contact mortality such as those done with chemicals (e.g., chlorinated hydro- carbons, organophosphorus, and carbamate pesticides) may not be the most realistic tests for these groups of MPCAs. Other researchers have attempted to design tests which include consumption of the MPCA by the predator larvae. Hassan and Groner (1977) produced a three- level test in which lacewing larvae were (1) directly sprayed with a suspension of NPV of Mamestra brassicae, (2) placed on dried residues of the NPV, and (3) fed for 3 days on artificial diet containing the NPV. The larvae were then placed in untreated containers with untreated host and the fecundity of the adults resulting from the treated larvae, food consumption rate of the larvae, and % egg hatch of the resulting adults were measured. The NPV of M. brassicae had no significant effect on these parameters. Salama et _al_. (1982) had a 3 ------- two level test in which lacewing larvae were (1) fed for 7 days on Aphis durante sprayed with a suspension of 13. thuringiensis. and (2) fed for 7 days on Spodoptera littoral is (Lepidoptera) fed for 24 hours an artificial diet containing B_. thuringiensis. After 7 days, the larvae were fed untreated host; it was found that their larval duration was significantly longer and consump- tion rate significantly lower. Umarov et jil_. (1975) found no mortality when larvae were exposed to plants or prey sprayed with jj. thuringiensis. Wilton and Klowden (1985) fed solubilized crystals of ti. thuringiensis to newly adult £. carnea and observed no mortality. From these experiments using varied methods for detecting immediate and long-term toxic effects of MPCAs, five tests were selected for this protocol. Test Procedures A. Summary of Tests: Test 1 — Adults Since £. carnea adults actively move from plant to plant, they contact treated surfaces for short periods. Thus, their dermal exposure is less than that of larvae. In addition, adults preen themselves and feed on plant nectar, making oral inoculation the most likely route and the most conservative test for this stage of C. carnea. The suggested method for testing adults is described by Wilton and Klowden (1985). Newly emerged £. carnea adults are held by the wings with forceps and offered 1 microliter of solubilized MPCA or heat-inactivated MPCA. Adults drink readily upon emergence. After the drop is ingested, the test insects are placed either individually or as treatment groups in cages with food and a water source and checked for mortality after 48 and 72 hours. If no mortality occurs after 72 hours, observations should be made daily for up to 7 days. Equal numbers of males and females should be ------- tested. Initial doses used should utilize the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx, and l/10x the proposed field rate, as well as a heat-inacti- vated control. If mortality to adults occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established. Test 2 — Adults Fungal pathogens may penetrate the adult lacewing integument and so a contact toxicity test was designed for this group. A 1-ounce cup (or other suitable disposable container) is sprayed or dusted with the MPCA or inactivated MPCA. Adults are provided food and water and mortality is assessed after 48 and 72 h. If no mortality occurs after 72 hours, observations should be made daily for 7 days. Equal numbers of males and females should be tested. Initial doses used should utilize the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx, and l/10x the proposed field rate, as well as an inactivated control. If mortality to adults occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be estab- lished. Test 1 -- Larvae The first test consists of dipping or spraying? the test cage with a suspension of the MPCA or heat-inactivated MPCA and placing first Instar £. carnea larvae on the dried residues with untreated prey. It is important to treat every surface that the larvae will contact, since larvae will avoid resting on repellent chemicals. After 7 days, the larvae are moved to untreated dishes and fed untreated prey until pupation. Percentage larval 2 Precautions should be taken to avoid breathing the aerosol, I.e., carry out spraying in a Class II containment hood. ------- mortality, mean larval duration, percentage successful emergence of adults, and number and percentage hatch of eggs deposited by 20 mated females for a 2-week period (which were exposed to the MPCA as larvae) are measured. Initial doses should use the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx, and l/10x the proposed field rate, as well as a heat-inactivated control. If mortality to larvae occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established. x Test 2 — Larvae This method is described by Salama et^ al_. (1982). Two-day-old C_. carnea larvae are fed for 7 days on eggs, larvae, or pupae of the target host which have been sprayed2 with a suspension of an MPCA or heat-inactivated MPCA. If the target host is not available, the next best hose choice is one in the same insect order which is also susceptible to the MPCA (commonly used prey are neonate larvae of Lepidoptera, lepidopterous eggs, or aphids). After 7 days, the larvae are fed untreated prey until pupation. Percentage larval mortality, mean larval duration, percentage successful emergence of adults, and number and percentage hatch of eggs deposited by 20 mated females for a 2-week period (which were exposed to the MPCA as larvae) are measured. Initial doses should use the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx and l/10x the proposed field rate, as well as a heat-inactivated control. If mortality to larvae occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established. Test 3 — Larvae The most rigorous test is to assay the effect of £. carnea larvae feeding on target hosts which have ingested the MPCA organism. However, target hosts 6 ------- may be difficult to obtain, inoculate, rear, and feed to the lacewing larvae. Caution should be used if artificial diets are used instead of live prey, because the diets are difficult to produce and will reduce the vitality and survival of lacewing larvae (Tulisalo in Canard et al., 1984). This confuses insect mortality because of the inadequate larval nutrition. The method chosen for this protocol is described by Salama et^ ^U (1982). The £. carnea larvae are fed for 7 days on the target host, which has been fed for 24 h on an artificial diet containing the MPCA at a specific concentration. The control £. carnea receive prey which have been fed artificial diet contain- ing the heat-inactivated MPCA. After 7 days, the lacewing larvae are fed until pupation on untreated diet. Percentage larval mortality, mean larval duration, percentage successful emergence of adults, and number and percentage hatch of eggs deposited by 20 mated females for a 2-week period (which were exposed to the MPCA as larvae) are measured. This test requires that an artificial diet be available for the target host. Artificial diets are not available for some insect groups such as aphids; in this case, the lacewing larvae could be fed the MPCA directly in lacewing artificial diet without involvement of the target host. Initial doses should utilize the formulated MPCA at the proposed field rate, lOx and l/10x the proposed field rate, as well as a heat-inactivated control. If mortality to larvae occurs at these doses, a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established. B. Test Species: The common lacewing, Chyroperla carnea (previously known as Chrysopa carnea) is available as eggs from many commercial biological control suppliers (e.g., 1. Bioinsect Control, 1710 S. Broadway, Plainview, Texas 79072; 2. Peaceful Valley Farms, 11173 Peaceful Valley Road, Nevada City, California 7 ------- 95959; 3. Biogenesis, Inc., Lake Road, P.O. Box 36, Mathis, Texas 78368).3 Ideally, an inhouse colony of lacewings should be maintained so that the diet and rearing conditions can be kept uniform. However, £. carnea have voracious appetites, are cannibalistic, and so must be fed every 48 hours. Thus, great time and expense may be required to maintain a colony of lacewings and suffi- cient live prey to feed them. If eggs are obtained from commercial sources, the larvae must be fed as soon as they hatch and should be used for testing ca. 2 days after hatching. It is important to test lacewing larvae as first instars because the longer they are reared as a group, the higher cannibalism rate. Even if cannibalistic attacks are not fatal, the vigor of the test animals is reduced. Also, when treated as first instar larvae, subsequent larval, pupal, and adult stages can be observed for sublethal effects. An excellent summary of the techniques for rearing lacewings is found in the Biology of Chrysopidae (Canard et al. 1984). Eggs and larvae of the potato tuberworm, Phthorimaea operculella, and grain moth eggs such as Anagasta kuhnielja (Zeller) or Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) are commonly used as food for £. carnea larvae. The adults rear extremely well on a diet of water and a food source consisting of 1 gram yeast hydrolysate (Yeast Products, Inc., Clifton, New Jersey) + 6 grams Formula 57 (Qualcepts Company, Edina, Minnesota) + 10 grams honey + enough water to make a paste. C. Test Conditions: During testing, both larvae and adults should be kept in a growth chamber (16-hour photoperiod, 50-80% RH, 22-26°C). Temperature and humidity should be adjusted within these ranges for optimal effectiveness of the MPCA. Adults 3 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. 8 ------- should be provided food (1 g yeast hydrolysate + 6 g Formula 57 + 10 g honey + water) and water-soaked cotton. Adults can be grouped in a petri dish half or other cage setup such as 8 to 16 ounce plastic cartons. The adult cage should have a mesh opening for airflow. Larvae must be provided prey (grain moth eggs, aphids, and/or neonate Lepidoptera larvae) every 48 to 72 hours. A water source is not needed. Larvae must be placed individually in cages such as 1-ounce plastic cups with tight-fitting lids (e.g., 1-oz. Serco Cups, manufactured by S. E. Rykoff and Co., California) to prevent escape and cannibalism. Larvae should be 2 to 4 days old at the start of the test. Regular disinfection of cages must be done; equipment, instruments, and supplies must be sterilized and aseptic techniques used when indicated. Stock colonies must be separated physically (separate laboratory or build- ing) from test area, where contact with MPCAs could occur. As a general rule, if larval or adult control mortality is greater than 20% or successful pupation is less than 75%, then the colony is diseased or inappropriately fed, invalidating test results. D. Number of Individuals in Treatment Groups: There should be at least 40 adult £. carnea per treatment rate, with the same number in the control group. Usually 5 individuals are placed in each test cage and 2 to 3 groups of 15 to 20 adults are tested on different dates. For the larval testing, a minimum of 100 larvae should be tested per treatment rate since larvae are more plentiful than adults and since the tests measure long-term effects. Usually, 20 to 25 larvae are tested per treatment and the tests are replicated 4 times. ------- E. Preparation and Quantification of Test Materials: The MPCA should be prepared using the manufacturer's directions. Ini- tially, rates tested should include the proposed field rate, 1/10 the fjeld rate, and 10 times the field rate. If significant mortality is observed at these rates, than a dose response should be conducted using at least 4 treat- ment rates and a water control. If no mortality is observed at the initial dosages, the value of a dose response is dubious and a dose response test need not be performed. When performing any of the microbial procedures used in this protocol, it is recommended that the Class II containment procedures be followed as speci- fied in Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (Birchardson and Barkley, 1984). F. Application Methods: Test 1 — Adults The formulated MPCA is drawn up into a microliter pipet and the newly- emerged adult lacewing is held gently by the wings and allowed to feed on a 1-microliter droplet. Test 2 — Adults The adult cage, which may be a petri dish or disposable plastic cup with lid, should be sprayed, dipped, or dusted with the MPCA so that the entire inside surface is treated. The cage is air-dried for 1 hour. One to 5 adult lacewings and food and water are then placed inside the cage. 10 ------- Test 1 — Larvae The larval cage, which may consist of a 1-ounce plastic cup with lid, should be dipped in or sprayed^ to runoff with a suspension of the MPCA so that all of the inside surface of the cup and lid is treated. The cage is drained and then air-dried for 1 hour. One lacewing larva and untreated prey are then placed inside the cage. Test 2 -- Larvae The target host or other suitable prey for C_. carnea are sprayed using a Potter spray tower (Burkard Manufacturing Company, Ltd., Woodcock Hill, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire WD3, 1P5, England) or other spray device. If a Potter spray tower is not available, an inexpensive alternative involves the use of a propellent spray apparatus such as Crown SprayTool Power Pak (Crown Industrial Products Company, Hebron, Illinois 60034) which contains a chloro- fluorocarbon under pressure (62 pounds at 70°F). Separate plastic tubes and bottles should be kept for each MPCA concentration to prevent contamination due to residues. The target host should be sprayed for 1 second from a distance of 8 inches. All sprays should be conducted in a laminar flow hood and the test personnel should wear gloves, laboratory coats, and masks. Air exhausted from the spray areas must not be recirculated. Appropriate hoods with HEPA filters must be used. A minimum class II hood is needed. Waste MPCAs should be disposed of properly. The treated target host is then fed to 2-day-old lace- wing larvae. 11 ------- Test 3 -- Larvae Specific doses of the formulated MPCA are incorporated into target host artificial diet or lacewing artificial diet. The target host or lacewing diet is then fed to 2- to 4-day-old lacewing larvae. G. Post Treatment Observations Tests 1 and 2 — Adults Adult lacewing females and males should be evaluated after 48 and 72 hours. Death is assumed if an individual is unable to move when gently touched with a brush. If there is no mortality after 72 hours, observations should be continued for 7 days. Tests 1, 2, and 3 — Larvae Lacewing larvae should be evaluated for mortality after 48 and 72 hours. Death is assumed if the larva is unable to walk when gently touched with a brush. Records should be kept of percentage larval mortality, mean time in days until pupation, % successful emergence as adults, and number and percent- age hatch of eggs deposited by 20 pairs of mated 10-day-old females. £. carnea must mate to produce fertile offspring and do not reach peak oviposition until approximately 1 week after emergence. Therefore, sexed pairs should be caged upon emergence and records of number and % hatch of eggs should be initiated 10 days after emergence. Number and percentage egg hatch should be measured for 2 week s. H. Reporting: Test data should be recorded as described and include: 12 ------- 1. Name of the test, sponsor, test laboratory, study director, principal investigator, and dates of testing. 2. A detailed description of the test MPCA, including the formulation concen- tration, and lot number or batch number. Include the type of dilutions carried out. 3. Detailed information about the source of lacewings used, and history of indigenous disease, if known. Age of test subjects, test conditions (temperature, lighting level and duration, and relative humidity) should be included, as well as the exact method of dosing. 4. Describe the test substrates, dimensions, number of test predators per cage, and number of replicates per dilution of MPCA. 5. The percentage of test subjects dead at each dose after each observation period should be reported. 6. For long-term tests of larvae, the mean duration in days of the larval period, the percentage successful emergence of adults, and the number of eggs and the % egg hatch of 20 pairs of adults should be reported. 7. If a dose response is conducted, the statistical test used should be reported (logit or probit). Minimal data reported would include the LCso and confidence interval, the slope, and intercept. 8. Any deviation from this test protocol should be reported, as well as anything unusual about the test such as temperature fluctuations, disease problems in the predators, etc. 13 ------- REFERENCES Bigler, F. 1984. Biological control by chrysopids: integration with pesti- cides, pp. 233-246. Jj^ Biology of Chrysopidae, M. Canard, Y. Semeria, and T. R. New (eds.), Dr. W. Junk Publishers. The Hague, The Netherlands. Birchardson, J. H., and W. Emmett Barkely (eds.). 1984. Biosafety in Micro- biological and Biomedical Laboratories. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia. Canard, M., Y. Semeria, and T. R. New (eds.). 1984. Biology of Chrysopidae. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands. Chapter 8. Biological and integrated control by chrysopids. 8.1 Mass rearing techniques, by U. Tulisalo, pp. 213-220. Franz, J. M., H. Bogenschutz, S. A. Hassan, P. Huang, E. Nation, H. Suter, and 6. Viggiani. 1980. Results of a joint pesticide test programme by the working group: pesticides and beneficial arthropods. Entomophaga 25:231-236. Grafton-Cardwell, E. E., and M. A. Hoy. 1985. Intraspecific variability in response to pesticides in the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Hilgardia 53:1-32. Hassan, S. A., and A. Groner. 1977. Die Wirkung von Kernpolydern (Baculovirus Spec.) aus Mamestra brassicae auf Trichogramma cacoeciaeps (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammitadae) und Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 22:281-288. 14 ------- Salama, H. S., F. N. Zaki, and A. F. Sharaby. 1982. Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis Berl. on parasites and predators of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera UttoraTIs (Boisd.). Z. Angew. Entomol. 94:498-503. Suter, H. 1978. Prufung der Einwirkung von Pflanzenschutzmltteln auf die Nutzarthropoden, Chrysopa carnea Steph. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) -- Methodic und Ergebnisse. Schweizerische Landwirtschaftliche Forschung 17:37-44. Umarov, S. A., Nilova, G. N., and I. D. Davlyatov. 1975. The effect of entobakterin and dendrobacillin on beneficial arthropods (in Russian). Zashch. Rast. 3:25-36. (English abstract translation in Rev. Appl. Ent. A64:6920, 1976). Wilkinson, J. D., K. D. Biever, and C. M. Ignoffo. 1975. Contact toxicity of some chemical and biological pesticides to several insect parasitoids and predators. Entomophaga 20:113-120. Wilton, B. E., and M. J. Klowden. 1985. Solubilized crystal of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis: effect on adult house flies, stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae), and green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1:97-98. 15 ------- Interim Protocol for Testing the Effects of Microbial Pathogens on Predatory Henri pterans (Henri ptera: Lygaeidae) INTRODUCTION Registrations of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MPCAs) under subsection M of the Fungicide Insecticide Rodenticide Act requires that the susceptibility of nontarget species be tested. Among nontarget species important in various agroecosystems are predatory true bugs in the Geocorinae subfamily of the family Lygaeidae. These true bugs are Important predators of mites and numerous insect pest species, especially pests in their egg or early larval stages. As such geocorines, especially members of the genus Geocoris are important agents of biological control of pest insects. In the southern and southwestern agroecosystems of the U.S., £. punctipes 1s one of the most economically Important members of this genus. This document will outline proposed methods of testing these geocorine predators with MPCAs. These methods will have to be adapted to specific microbial agents, depending upon the mode of action of the MPCA. Caution should be exercised in Interpreting the results of such tests In predicting the effects of the MPCA's under field conditions. Precise correlation in dosage relationships between laboratory and field tox1c1t1es are rare. Effects of enviornmental factors in the field are difficult to duplicate under laboratory conditions. Laboratory data may overestimate or underestimate toxicity. MPCAs may have direct and indirect effects on predatory Insects. They may be directly toxic to predators, and/or may adversely affect predators by reducing the numbers of their food supply. They may even ------- have a temporarily beneficial effect upon the predators by weakening or killing prey, making these prey more susceptible to predator attack or scavenging. In any of these cases, classical serial dilutions of the pathogen to produce 1650 determinations with the predator may not be useful if the effect is due to indirect mortality. The geocorines are primarily predaceous lygaeids with some plant feeding as a means of getting water. Damage to plant tissue is negligible: the value of geocorines as predators of crop pests is great. As heteropterans, Geocoris punctipes and other ja. spp. probe foods with their piercing/sucking mouthparts. Mobile prey are paralyzed by injection of a venom, and body fluids and liquified body parts are ingested through the beak of these insects. As heteropterans Gi. punctipes is a hemimetabolous insect with 3 stages in its life cycle: egg, nymphal and adult stages. The nymphs undergo 5 molts in becoming adults. The life cycle at 27°C for £. punctipes fed budworm or boll worm eggs is about 22 days from egg to adult, 7 days of egg development and in excess of 120 days as adults. Females that have been adults for 2 - 4 days can lay 1 - 5 eggs/day for more than 100 days. Healthy adult males weigh from 3 to 5 mg; females weigh from 4 to 7 mg. Both adults and nymphs are strongly predaceous on numerous species of insect and mite prey. There is no existing literature on the effects of MPCA's on J3. punctipes or any geocorine lygaeid for that matter. ------- TEST PROCEDURES Summary of tests. Rickettsias, protozons, viruses, and bacteria most often enter insects orally (via os); therefore the tests recommended for these MPCAs is through food contamination. Fungi often infect insects through the cuticle, so topical application is recommended for these MPCAs. Specific techniques from Poinar and Thomas, 1978 are recommended for inoculation and diagnosis of each agent. The tests are designed to test direct mortality, the indirect mortality tests being those applied to various geocorine prey of numerous taxa. The species of predator described here, Geocoris punctipes, is among the most widely distributed, abundant, polyphagous and economically important geocorines (predaceous lygaeids). While they are not available from commercial suppliers, they are easily obtained from agricultural fields and readily cultured by methods described by Champ!ain and Sholdt (1967) on natural diet or by Cohen (1985) on artificial diet. Test 1 assays the toxicity of ingested MPCAs to adult females. Test 2 assays the toxicity of topically or externally applied MPCAs. Tests 3 and 4 pertain to ingested and externally applied MPCA's in nymphal Gu punctipes. TEST 1; Adults of both sexes are placed in containers with artificial prey that have been inoculated with the MPCA. Containers are also equipped with cotton wadding as oviposition sites and free water in a sponge-filled Petri dish (Cohen, 1985). After 72 hours, cotton wadding is removed for inspection and counting of eggs. Every 3 days, diet ------- capsules should be replaced; and eggs should be counted. This procedure should be repeated 3 times for a total of 9 test days. Eggs should be removed and discarded with each count. Initial doses used should be at the proposed field rate for that MPCA, 10X and 1/1 OX the proposed field rate as well as a control with no MPCA. A statistical test (ANOVA) must be used to compare numbers of eggs from treated vs control individuals. Should any adverse response be noted at any level of MPCA concentration, a serial dilution of MPCA is made and a full dose response can be established. TEST 2; The floor of a 1 gallon ice-cream carton used as a rearing cage should be sprayed with MPCA at field concentration, 10X and 1/1 OX field concentration and an unsprayed control should be concurrently tested. Diet and water should be provided, and 6 adult 05. punctipes, 3 of each sex, should be placed in each of the containers. Mortality should be measured at the end of a 48 hour exposure period. Surviving £. punctipes should be re-located in unsprayed containers (free of MPCA) that are marked to indicated MPCA exposure history (field, 10X, 1/10X and control) and allowed to oviposition for 5 days (120 h). Cotton wadding in 3X3 cm sheets should be placed in cages as an oviposition substrate. At the end of the oviposition period eggs on sheets and in cages should be counted and incubated for 10 days at 27°C and 70-80% RH. At the end of this incubation period eggs should be inspected so that hatch (fertility) counts can be made. Statistical tests (ANOVA) should be used to compare means of % survival, fecundity, and fertility. ------- TEST 3: Nymphal Development with MPCA in Diet Newly hatched 1st instar nymphs of £. punctipes are provided water and units of artificial diet for 15 days. Diet units should, be changed every third day. By the end of this period all surviving nymphs should have reached the 3rd instar nymphal period. Ten of these 3rd instar nymphs should be placed in a 1 gallon rearing contained with diet units contained IX, 10X, 1/10X field concentrations of the MPCA. Water should be provided as well as 3 2X10 cm strips of tissue paper to provide hiding places in order to reduce cannibalism. Diet units should be changed every other day. At the end of 3 weeks, counts of surviving individuals should be made and % adult eclosion determined. TEST 4: Nymphal Development with MPCA on Container Surface Test cage is dipped or sprayed* with MPCA or heat-inactivated MPCA solution. Surfaces of cages should be IX, 10X, or 1/1 OX field concentrations or control (heat-inactivated MPCA) treatment. The conditions should otherwise duplicate those of Test 3 with 3rd Instar nymphs used to start the test and 3 weeks of exposure. Counts of surviving individuals and % adult eclosion should be made for statistical comparison (by ANOVA). Where positive tests are Indicated, serial dilutions of MPCA and full dose response should be established. *Precautions should be taken to avoid breathing the aerosol, i.e., carry out spraying in laminar flow hood. ------- Test Species The predator, Geocorls punctlpes can be kept In the laboratory via an inhouse colony maintained on artificial diet made of beef liver, hamburger and sucrose solution packaged in stretched paraff 1m diet units as described by Cohen, 1985. Cultures of £. punctlpes or other species of Geocoris can be started from field-collected samples. The use of an artificial diet obviates rearing of prey as food sources both of nymphal and adult stages, greatly simplifying tests of MPCAs. MPCAs obtained from the manufacturer should be tested in the formulation expected to be used under commercial conditions. Test Conditions During testing, as in rearing, both adults and nymphs of §. punctlpes (or other geocorines) should be kept 1n a growth chamber at 27°C^ 1°C, 40 - 50% RH with a 16 hour photophase. Because of a constant potential of cannibalism In J5. punctlpes. crowding should be avoided (I.e., no more than 5 individuals/500 ml of rearing space). Also strips of tissue paper wadded and placed on the cage bottom are helpful in averting cannibalism. For purposes of standardization, strips of the same dimensions and the same number should be provided in all tests. Containers such as 1 pint Ice cream cartons with tops replaced by organdy screen are suitable for groups of 5 or 6 £. punctlpes. Petrl dishes (7-9 mm diameter) fitted with a sponge are adequate watering devices. Stretched parafilm feeding units (Cohen, 1985) are essential for allowing feeding. ------- Number of Predators In Treatment Groups The number of test predators per treatment should be no less than 40 and preferably 100, with the same number In each control group. Locations of eggs should be marked with India ink to simplify counting. This is especially important with eggs deposited into cotton wadding. A total of 40-100 eggs per test dose should be evaluated. Preparation and Quantification of Test Materials The MPCA should be prepared using the manufacturer's directions. Initially, rates tested should include the proposed field rate, 1/10 the field rate, and 10X the field rate. If significant mortality or reduction in fecundity or fertility is observed at these rates, then a dose response should be conducted using at least 4 treatment rates and a water control. Application Methods MPCAs can be added to the diet during diet preparation when the sucrose/H20 solution is added to the homogenized meat mixture. Calculations of the appropriate dilution are based on the fact that the sucrose solution constitutes 6% of the final diet on a volume/weight basis. Application of MPCAs for tests involving dried residues is achieved by spraying appropriate doses on the cage surface using a Potter spray tower (available from Burkard Mfg. Co. Ltd., Woodcock Hill, Rickmanworth, Hertfordshire, WD3 IPS, England) or a substitute such as a propellent spray apparatus such as CrownR Spray-Tool Power Pak (Crown Industrial ------- 8 Products Co., Hebron, 111. 60034), which contains a chlorofluorocarbon under pressure (62 Ibs. at 70°F). Separate plastic tubes and bottles should be kept for each MPCA used to reduce the likelihood of contamination of the holding container with previously-used MPCA. All sprays should be conducted in a laminar flow hood and the test personnel should wear gloves, laboratory coats, and masks. Care should be taken to avoid contamination of personnel and the environment. Waste MPCAs should be properly disposed of. Post Treatment Observations Test 1 — Adults Survival of adults should be monitored 48 hours after onset of exposure to diets or substrates treated with MPCAs. Egg production (fecundity) should be monitored 1 week after exposure and egg hatch (fertility) should be monitored until 10 days after the last eggs were laid. Survival and adult eclosion of nymphal (i. punctipes should be monitored for each treatment both in nymphs given MPCA treated diet and in surface-exposed individuals. Mean % survival and mean % adul.t eclosion should be monitored after 3 weeks of exposure to dietary or surface-contacted MPCA's. ------- Reporting: Test data should be recorded as described above. Data submitted should include the following: 1. Name of the test, sponsor, test laboratory, study director, principal investigator, and dates of testing. 2. A detailed description of the test MPCA, including the formulation of concentration. Include the type of dilutions carried out. 3. Detailed information about the source of G. punctipes used, and history of indigenous disease, if known. Age of test subjects, test conditions (temperature, lighting level and duration, and relative humidity) should be included. 4. Describe the test substrates, dimensions, number of test predators per cage, and number of replicates per dilution of MPCA. 5. The percentage of test subject dead at each dose after each observation period should be reported. 6. For long-term tests of nymphs, the mean duration in days of the nymphal period, the percentage successful emergence of adults, and % egg hatch of 20 pairs of adults should be reported. 7. If a dose response is conducted, the statistical test used should be reported (logit or probit). Minimal data reported would include the 1650 and confidence interval, the slope, and intercept. 8. Any deviation from this test protocol should be reported, as well as anything unusual about the test such as temperature fluctuation, disease problems in the predators, etc. ------- 10 References Champlain, R. A., and L. L. Sholdt. 1967. Life history of Geocoris punctipes (Henriptera: Lygaeidae) in the laboratory"Ann. tntomol. Soc. Am. 60:881-3. Cohen, Allen C. 1985. Simple Method for Rearing the Insect Predator Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) on a Meat Diet. d. Econ. Entomol. 78: 1173-75. Cooper, D. J. 1981. The Role of Predatory Henri ptera in Disseminating a Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus of Heliothis Punctiger. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 20: 145-50. Dunbar, D. M., and 0. G. Bacon. 1972a. Influence of temperature on development and reproduction of Geocoris atricolor, G. pal and JG. punctipes from California"! Environ. Entomol.~"1:596 Dunbar, D. M., and 0. G. Bacon. 1972b. Feeding, development and reproduction of Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae eight diets. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65:892-5. Poinar, G. 0., Jr. and G. M. Thomas. 1978. Diagnostic Manual for the Identification of Insect Pathogens. Plenum Press, New York 218 pp. Steinhaus, E. A. 1949. Principles of Insect Pathology. McGraw Hill, New York, 757 pp. Wilkinson,J. D., K. D. Biever, and C. M. Ignoffo. 1975. Contact Toxicity of Some Chemical and Biological Pesticides to Several Insect Parasitoids and Predators. Entomophaga 20(1):113-120. Wilkinson, J. D; K. D. Biever, and C. M. Ignoffo. 1979. Synthetic Pyrethroid and Organophosphate Insecticides Against the Parasitoid Apanteles marginiventris and the Predators Geocoris ^_^ :onvergen! J. Econ. Entomol. 72(4):473-75. punctipes. Hippodamfa convergens, and Podisus maculiventris. ------- Progress Report 'to EPA 8/1/85 to 1/31/86 (first 6 months) Methods for Assessing Fate of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms in Soil Grant No. CR812476-01 J.M. Tiedje and B.K. Chelm, Co-Principal Investigators Michigan State University Extraction, purification and probing soil DNA We have developed a protocol for the extraction of total bacterial DNA from soil. Previously used protocols for the extraction of bacterial DNA from soil involve the use of trichloroacetic acid treatment, followed by ethanol/ether extraction of soil bacterial fractions filtered through acid- washed diatomaceous earth (1), or purification of DNA from detergent, and high-salt by hydroxyapatite column chromatography (2). However, because we anticipate the necessity of isolating bacterial DNA of sufficient purity for use in hybridization studies from large numbers of soil samples, it was desirable to develop a procedure that would allow the simultaneous processing of multiple soil samples and yield high molecular weight DNA, in a concentrated and purified form, in a short period of time. The DNA isolation protocol which we have developed involves an initial separation of soil bacteria from fungal biomass and soil debris. This separation involves multiple rounds of homogenization of the soil into a buffered salt solution followed by fractionated centrifugation. This fractionated centrifugation technique was developed by Goksoyr and co- workers (3) and involves first a low-speed centrifugation step. This low speed centrifugation pellets the fungal biomass and the soil debris in the homogenate while leaving the soil bacteria in the supernatant. A second high-speed centrifugation step pellets the soil bacteria contained in the supernatant from the low-speed centrifugation. The pellet from the low- speed centrifugation is extracted a second and third time to enhance the yield of soil bacteria. Using this protocol, more than 50% of the bacteria contained in the soil sample are isolated after three rounds of homogenization/centrifugation. Additional rounds of homogenization/centrifugation serve to isolate additional soil bacteria but in increasingly lower proportions (3,4). It appears that-the distribution of the different bacterial types remains constant through eight rounds of homogenization/centrifugation such that the bacterial fraction, after the first round of purification, is presumed to be as representative of the entire bacterial population present in the soil as the combined bacterial fraction after eight rounds of purification (4). Since three rounds of purification yields about 50% of the bacterial population and is representative of the entire bacterial population, and further rounds of purification yield diminishing amounts of bacteria, we used three rounds of purification by fractionated centrifugation in our protocol. The purified bacterial fraction is then lysed using a protocol which is derived from, and includes the salient features of, several individual lysis protocols designed for use with various type of bacteria. We have combined the important features of several lysis protocols in an effort to insure the maximal disruption of the various types of bacteria present in the natural soil population. The purified bacterial fraction is first washed in 2% sodium hexametaphosphate pH 8.5 and then washed twice in Crorabach's buffer (Tris-HCl 33 mM, EDTA 1 mM, pH 8..5) as described by V.L. Torsvik (2). The cells are then incubated for 10 min in Crombach's buffer brought to 1 M with NaCl. This incubation in high concentrations of NaCl is necessary for the efficient lysis of slow-growing species of RhLzobia. ------- (5). The cells are then collected by centirifugation and resuspended in TS (Tris-HCl 50 mM, NaCl 50 mH, pH 8.5) to which Sarkosyl is added to a final concentration of 0.1%. Prewashing in 0.1% Sarkosyl allows for more efficient lysis of lysozyme refractory strains of bacteria, presumably by making the cell wall more susceptible to attack by lysozyme by some, as yet, unknown mechanism (6). The cells are again collected by centrifugation and resuspended in a sucrose solution (sucrose, 0.75 K; Tris-HCl, 50 mM, pH 8.5; EDTA, 10 mM) and incubated on ice for 20 min. Lysozyme is then added to a final concentration of 5 mg/ml, followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Pronase is then added to a concentration of 0.625 mg/ml followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Following the 37°C incubation, the mixture is heated to 60°C at which time Sarkosyl is added to a final concentration of 1% followed by incubation for 10 min at 60°C. The lysate mixture can now be kept on ice overnight. The lysate mixture is then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 min. The supernatant from this centrifugation is used to prepare cesium chloride-ethidium bromide gradients for equilibrium centrifugation. Following equilibrium centrifugation the total bacterial DNA can be visualized as a discrete band in the gradient using long-wave ultraviolet light. The DNA band is fractionated from the gradient and extracted in isopropanol, precipitated, by ethanol and extracted with phenol according to standard techniques. DNA purified as just described is at least 47 kilobases long and is not subject to degradation under standard conditions for nuclease digestion. The addition of exogenous restriction endonucleases under the same conditions shows that the DNA can readily be digested to completion. We are currently performing hybridization experiments on DNA isolated from soil in order to determine the lowest level at which a particular DNA sequence can be present and still be detectable. These experiments involve combining genomic DNA isolated from a Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain which contains the gene for kanamycin resistance in its chromosome with the DNA proportions such that there is essentially an end-point dilution of the B. japonicum DNA into the soil DNA. The DNAs are digested with the restriction endonuclease Hind III then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis followed by Southern transfer to nitrocellulose filters. The filters are then probed using pkC7 DNA which has been alpha labeled with p by nick-translation. pKC7 contains the gene for kanamycin resistance. In this way, we will be able to determine the lowest limit at which the DNA sequence must be present in order to be detected by hybridization. DNA hybridization as a method for quantitation of a dechlorinating isolate in mixed communities. The dechlorinating bacterium, DCB-1, is able to remove halogen atoms from the aromatic ring of some toxic compounds. Because of this dechlorination property, it is the type of organism that will be "engineered" for proposed release to treat hazardous wastes. DCB-1 is a member of an anaerobic consortium able to completely degrade chlorobenzoate. The other members of the consortium include a benzoate degrading organism and methanogens. Quantitation of various members of the consortium is complicated by the dependence of the benzoate degrader on the methanogen, and the strict anaerobic requirements of all the members. Therefore, the purpose of these experiments is to adapt.existing DNA- hybridization techniques to quantitation of DCB-1 in these unique cultures. Since DCB-1 is a very unusual bacterium with no known relatives, its DNA may be somewhat more unique than for many natural isolates. Since the ------- consortium is a simple, defined interacting microbial community, it can serve as a model for development of these techniques for more complex systems. In addition, we are interested in looking for the presence of DCB-1, or a similar organism, in other anaerobic samples enriched for degradation of halogenated toxic compounds. DNA was first isolated from anaerobic enrichments and pure cultures. The isolated DNA was purified and spotted onto a nitrocellulose filter. Genomic DNA from DCB-1 was nick-translated to serve as a radioactive probe for similar DNA on the filter. The DNA was hybridized to the filter and the amount of hybridization was quantified by autoradiography. Intensity of the autoradiographic signal corresponds with the degree of hybridization and indicates the amount of like DNA in the samples. A variety of cultures were probed with the dechlorinator DNA. These included the consortium of which DCB-1 is known to be a member, a chlorophenol degrading enrichment, a phenol enrichment, and lambda DNA. The phenol enrichment and lambda DNA each served as negative controls. The phenol enrichment is not enriched for degradation of halogenated aromatic compounds, and does not express dechlorination activity. We are .in the process of probing DNA isolated from a sediment enriched for the bromobenzoate degradation. In addition, we will receive cultures which express dehalogenase-like activity from other sources (e.g. Germany and Battelle Laboratories, Columbus, OH). Table 1 shows the results of our first two experiments. Table 1. Percent hybridization of DCB-1 DNA to various cultures. Source of DNA ] % hybridization to DCB-1 DNA DCB-1* 100, 100 Consortium* 50, 50 Chlorophenol Enrichment Phenol Enrichment 3 Lambda* 0, 0 ** Bromobenzoate Enrichment N.D. Methanogen and Benzoate Degrader N.D. (from consortium) Methanogen only N.D. (from consortium) __ Results from two independent experiments. ^ Not enough DNA was extracted from this culture to obtain a reliable estimate. •Jf-Jf N.D. Not determined. We are in the process of analyzing these cultures. The chlorobenzoate-degrading consortium which includes DCB-1 as a member has 50% DNA hybridization to the dechlorinator (Table 1). It will be interesting to see the results of hybridization to the DNA of the benzoate-degrading organism, and the methanogen. This should tell us the amount of hybridization to other members of the consortium due to similar DNA sequences in these organisms. It should then be possible to more accurately quantitate DCB-1 in the consortium. DNA hybridization is a useful method for quantitatiorr of the- presence and concentration of DCB-1 in various anaerobic cultures. This method should also prove to be a useful technique for quantitation of other organisms in other complex environments, such as soil. ------- Development of a soil core microcosm We have been testing, modifying and retesting soil core designs that allow the detection of survival, transport and plasmid survival.and transfer of introduced soil bacteria. In our proposal we had fL argued that conventional selective markers were the only established reliable and sensitive method for monitoring organism fate. Therefore, one aspect of our research program was to further develop the use of this methodology as well as to use it for comparison with the gene probe methodology. Our approach uses the following principles: 1. The test method stresses reliability which in its broadest sense means good recoverability of viable GEMs or of the novel gene(s) and good reproducibility of environmental conditions. It also stresses cost- effectiveness so that many different GEMs or simulated conditions can be evaluated at one time. 2. Optimum conditions for survival and genetic transfer between microorganisms are maintained to ensure a worst case scenario. Also, natural soil bacteria have been used as test organisms as these have the best chance for survival. 3. Genetic donor and recipient bacteria are added to the soil. Both have chromosomal antibiotic resistance markers for easy selection and enumeration. Use of two organisms in one column allows obtaining . information on fate and survival of two organisms rather than one as well as provides an optimum recipient to increase the chance of obtaining genetic exchange. The donors contain high-frequency of transfer conjugative plasmids which offer the best route for genetic transfer between bacteria. The outline of the experiment is given in Fig. 1 where C0101 is the genetic donor of plasmid pDGlOl and CB101 is the potential recipient. After addition to soil the bacteria are enumerated by selective plating using resistance markers contained by each and the combined resistance markers of the transconjugant progeny. Our microcosm involves use of a packed soil column (Fig. 2) to which the donor and recipient bacteria are added. The core has two injection ports for the bacteria. The donor is injected in the top, the recipient in the bottom. Thus, the donor must be physically moved through the core by water percolation to reach the recipient for DNA transfer to take place. This method overcomes the problem of mixing large numbers of donors and recipients together and thereby enhancing conjugation by artificially creating a close physical presence. Bacteria were collected from the core either by percolating water through and collecting the effluent and by sacrificing the cores and extracting the bacteria by blending soil samples in a diluent which dislodges the bacteria from soil particles. This method also allows us to discern the effect of percolation on bacterial movement from the point of inoculation. Some of these cores were planted to wheat and others to corn to determine the effect plant roots had on transport, survival and genetic exchange. We have approached the question of the fate of the GEM by using a tiered system of analysis. The sequence outlined below offers a cost- effective approach. The initial screening for GEM survival is inexpensive and may preclude more difficult and expensive procedures used for genome detection and identification of GEM physical location. ------- Non-viable I. Establish viability of GEM £> Rapid death Viable , Non-detectable II. Establish fate of genome of interest -^. Genome loss 1 precludes need to Genome detected assess physical location of GEM III. Establish physical location of GEM. We have gone through this approach using a natural soil bacterium, CorynebacCerium flaccumfaciens, to assess its usefulness: I. Viability of GEM-Extraction of bacteria by blending soil samples and enumeration by selectively plating demonstrated an ideal population number for the bacterium of approximately 10 -10 /g soil (Fig. 3). This number remained constant for a period of over 3 months. We successfully extracted 10-100% of added bacteria. The method of recovery by percolation yielded approximately 1% of the introduced number but has allowed us to follow bacterial translocation through soil. We have demonstrated that plant roots enhance movement by 2X the number of bacteria obtained in the effluent without plant roots (Fig. 4). II. The genes of focus confer resistance to heavy metals and are located on a high frequency of transfer plasmid in the donor bacterium. The genome remained stable within the donor population even without selective pressure. The genome also was transferred to recipient bacteria at low frequencies. Our immediate goal for the future is to establish the detection limits for bacteria and for genomes in soil. To presume loss of a gene or of the GEM, it must be non-detectable under sufficiently sensitive conditions. By our extraction method we hope to reach the point of detecting 1 bacterium/g soil out of a natural population of 10 /g soil. We also plan to include soil derived Pseudomonas and Rhizobium strains in our soil core system in the near future. REFERENCES 1. Lid Torsvik, V. and Goksoyr, J. 1977. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10:7-12. 2. Lid Torsvik, V. personal communication. 3. Faegri, A., Lid Torsvik, V. and Goksoyr, J. 1976. Soil Biol. Biochem. 9:105-112. 4. Bakken, L.R. 1985. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:1482-1487. 5. Denarie, J., Boistard, P., Casse-Delbart, F. Atherly, A.G., Berry, J.O. and Russel, P. 1981. pp. 225-246. In K.L. Giels and A.G. Atherly (eds.) International Review of Cytology. Supplement 13, Biology of the Rhizobiaceae. Academic Press. 6. Schwinghamer, E.A. 1980. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 7:157-162. ------- Figure 1 . OUTLINE OF EXPERIMENT C0101 Smr Tcr pDG10l(ArsarArsir) CB101 Rfr Nar SOIL COLUMN „ BACTERIA EXTRACTED SELECTIVE PLATING CB101 TRANSCONJUGANT 1. PLASMID ISOLATION ;-: 2. COLONY HYBRIDIZATION ------- Figure 2 INJECTION PORT (DONOR) INJECTION PORT (RECIPIENT) WIRE MESH ------- Bacterial Survival in Soil Cores 1E+09 -• 1E+08 •- * cells/g soil 1E+07-- 1E+06-- 1E+05-. 1E+04 0x5 1 1.5 2 Time (weeks) 2.5 ------- Figure 4 BACTERIAL RECOVERY FROM SOIL CORES 108 x CO (wheat) o—-CO (no wheat) o CB (no wheat) x CB (wheat) DAYS ------- ASA -- CSSA -- S-SSA Title-Summary No. S3-31 Iplete two (2) copies. he interpretive summary you prepare is designed for people who are not familiar with your ork, yet are interested in what you are doing. Please make sure that your summary is Ilearly written and easy to understand by nonscientific people. Be sure to indicate the roper address to use in requesting a news release about your research. Keep the interpretiv ummary simple! This is not an abstract. Title: A Soil Column Method for Assessing the Effect of Plant Roots on Movement and Plasmid Transter or Conjugative Bacteria ^hors: P.F. DWYER*, J.R. KNUTSON, C.W. RICE, and J.M. TIEDJE itjHmary: • With the advent of molecular engineering the production of bacteria with novel genotypes has become more than academic. Soil is the environment most conducive to viability for many types of bacteria. We have, therefore, attempted to devise a test method to concurrently assess both the fate of a bacterium added to soil and the frequency of transfer of the novel genotype contained by that bacterium. As our test organisms we have used bacteria harboring plasmids with genetoypes that are not commonly found among soil bacteria. We used bacteria with plasmid-coded traits because plasmids theoretically represent the greatest possibility for gene transfer. The test method assesses population changes, ie. whether the bacterium will die- off or become established in soil. It is important to have a high sensitivity of detection for viable cells. Thus, we used antibiotic resistant bacteria for the purpose of selective plating of viable cells on appropriate media. To assess gene transfer we have designed our method such that both a plasmid-donor and plasmid- recipient strain are present in the soil. But to ensure that the method of addition does not prejudice gene transfer the two strains are physically separated and the plasmid-donor must be transported by water-saturated flow through the soil to effect transconjugation (i.e. plasmid transfer). Our experiments have demonstrated three things (1) our bacterial strains rapidly die off after addition to soil (2) transconjugation occurs at low detectable frequencies before the die-off, (3) bacterial movement through soil is facilitated by the presence of plant roots. ilinq address for your employer's office Mailing address for corresponding author: oublic relations: rce Charles Downs, Frf-it-n-r TTT P,.Mir p»Tat-tnnc Name Mr. Daryl F. Dwyer _ dress ns T.-mrnn Hall _ Address Dept. of Microbiology and Public Michigan Sl-afe TTm'vPTgi fy _ - - Hpalt-T-i^ M-ioV< «-at-o ITn-iir E-. Lansing Sta te MT Zi p inn?* C i ty F, T.an'ging State ( 517 ) 355-2281 _ Phone ( 517 ) 353-7858 _ ^il two (2) copies of your interpretive summary to: ASA, CSSA, SSSA Headquarters Office, 577 South Segoe Road, Madison, WI 53711. This material must reach the Headquarters Office 1 29 July 1985. ------- ABSTRACT FORM —AGRONOMY ABSTRACTS American Society of Agronomy — Crop Science Society of America — Soil Science Society of America Type one perfect copy following closely the directions below. Division and Title-Summary No. 53—31 A Soil Column Method for Assessing the Effect of Plant Roots on Movement and Plasmid Transfer of Conjugative Bacteria. D.F. DWYER*. J.R. KNUTSON, C.W. RICE, and J.M. TIEDJE, Michigan State Univ. A test method was devised for assessing the fate of plasmid- containing bacteria added to soil as to (a) survival, (b) movement with water percolation, and (c) frequency of plasmid transfer. The plasmid-donor was CorynebacCerium flaccumfaciens subsp. oortiL (C0101) which harbors plasmid (pDGlOl) that encodes resistance to arsenite and arsenate. The plasmid-recipient was, C. flaccumfacLens subsp. oorti (CB101). Both had chromosomal markers for antibiotic resistances allowing for selective plating of donor (Tet, Str, arsenite, arsenate), recipient (Nal, Rif, Amp) or transconjugants (Nal, Rif, Amp x arsenite, arsenate). The donor was added to the top layer of a packed-soil column, the recipient to the bottom; some columns contained wheat. The bacteria were leached through the column. The added bacterial strains were detected in the effluent for at least 3 weeks. The minimum number detectable represented 200 CFU/gra soil. Root channeling increased the number of j bacteria in the effluent. Transconjugants occurred at low j frequencies in columns with or without wheat. | Mailing Address of Corresponding Author: Title and name Department University or other organization Street or P.O. Box if needed City, State, ZIP CODE Mr. Daryl F. Dwyer Dept. of Microbiology and Public Health Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824 DIRECTIONS: 1) List ihe Division and Title-Summary number, e.g., A5-27, C3-77, S4-65, A3-I1P, as shown on the Title-Summary acknowledgment card. 2) This copy will be the photocopy for offset printing. No editorTal corrections will be made. Any part of the abstract not WITHIN the above boxed area is lost in reproduction. See reverse side for sample abstract. We suggest that you try a practice abstract before making the final copy. 3) Title and Authors— Start the title flush left and below top line. Indent each succeeding line in the title-author listing to the fifth space. Capiialize only the first letter of each major word in the title. Underline the title. List the authors with the initials first. CAPITALIZE ALL LAST NAMES OF AUTHORS. If more than one author, add an asterisk * to name of person presenting paper. Institution(s) follow authors' names; use abbreviations as suggested on reverse side. Include location by city and state only when federal agency or commercial firm is the sole one involved. 4) Do not leave a blank space between title-author listing and text. Type text as one paragraph, starting first line flush left. (over) ------- PROGRESS REPORT G. Stotzky CR812484 Transformation Studies Preliminary transformation studies are being conducted with Bacillus subtilis strain IS-75 as the recipient (obtained from Dr. Issar Smith, Public Health Research Institute of the City of New York; PHRI) and B. subtilis strain BD307 (obtained from Dr. David Dubnau, PHRI) as the donor of the transforming DNA. Strain IS-75 is auxotrpphic for histidine (hisAl), leucine (leuAS), and methionine (metBS), and strain BD307 is auxotrophic for pyrimidine (pyr26) and leucine (Ieu2). DNA from BD307 was purified, using standard techniques (e.g., Dubnau et al., 1971), and its efficiency of transformation was measured by addine various amounts, in a volume of 8 ;ul, to a constant quantity (100 jil containing ca. 7 x 10° cells) of competent IS-75 cells (the time of competency was determined earlier in growth studies), and the transform ants were enumerated, after incubation for 30 min at 33 C with shaking, on Spizizen agar augmented with histidine and leucine (i.e., transformation of the gene coding for methionine was measured). Although the transformation of other combinations of the three auxotrophic markers of IS-75 could have been studied, the efficiency of transformation of these genes on DNA from BD307 would probably be equal, and therefore, for these preliminary studies, only the transformation of the gene coding for methionine was measured. The transformation frequency (TF; number of transformed cells X 100/number of total cells) showed a direct linear relationship to the concentration of DNA added (Fig. 1). In subsequent experiments, lO^ig DNA (in 8;ul) was used. However, as this concentration of DNA was diluted in subsequent experiments (e.g., by the addition of clay suspensions, DNase solutions), the effect of dilution on the TF was determined. Even a ten-fold dilution yielded respectable and easily measurable TF values (Fig. 2). N To determine the effect of the clay mineral, montmorillonite (M), on the TF, various amounts of the clay (Bentonite, Fisher Scientific Co., which contains only M and a small amount of mica) were reacted with 10,ug DNA for 4 h on a rotating wheel at 33 C, and the M-DNA mixture was then incubated with 100 ^il of competent cells for 30 min at 33 C with shaking. There was a linear decrease in TF as the concentration of the clay was increased (Fig. 3). It has not been established whether this decrease was the result of the adsorption and binding of the DNA on M, of a competition between M and DNA for DNA-binding sites on the recipient cells, or of other factors. However, when M, DNA, and cells were incubated directly for 30 min, the TF was similar to that obtained after reaction of M and DNA for 4 h before incubation with the cells, suggesting that surface interactions between M and DNA were less important in reducing the TF than were possible steric effects of the clay at the cell surface. The reasons for the decrease in TF caused by M will be determined in future studies. DNA and M (at a ratio of lO^ug DNA/mg M) were reacted for 4 h, as above, and a 100 ;ul aliquot containing 10;og DNA and 1 mg M was incubated with 100 .ul of cells for 30 min at 33 C with shaking, and the number of transformants was enumerated. The remaining M-DNA mixture was then centrifuged (40,000 g for 10 min, refrigerated), a 100 ,ul aliquot of the supernatant was incubated, as above, with 100 ;il of cells, and the TF was determined. On the basis of the TF, the amount of DNA actually present was estimated from a standard curve (Fig. 1) of the TF in the absence of clay (S in Fig. 4). ------- The clay pellet was then resuspended in deonized water to yield 1 mg M/100^1, and 100 }A of the suspension was incubated, as above, with 100 ^ul of cells, and the TF was determined. The amount of DNA associated with M was deduced by subtracting the amount of DNA apparently present in supernatant 1 (S.) from the amount originally added (i.e., 10 ,ug), and this value was plotted against the TF obtained (P^ in Fig. 4). The pellet was then centrifuged, the TFs of the supernatant ($2) and the subsequently resuspended pellet (?2) were determined, as above, and the procedure was repeated once more (83, P3). These results showed again that the presence of M reduces the TF, that this reduction is linear and independent of the concentration of DNA, and that the DNA associated with M neither loses its transforming ability nor is tightly bound. The latter was further shown by the high amount of DNA that was recovered from M by the three sequential washings of the clay-DNA mixture (Fig. 5). To determine whether the presence of M affects the degradation of DNA by DNase, 10,ug DNA and 1 mg M (in 80,ul) were reacted for 4 h, as above, various concentrations of DNase (bovine pancreas DNase 1; Sigma) (in 20^11) were then reacted with the M-DNA mixture for 30 min at 37 C without shaking, and the 100 ;ul mixture was then incubated with 100>il of cells for 30 min at 33 C with shaking. The addition of DNase, even at DNase:DNA ratios of 1:1, 10:1, and 100:1, had no significant effect on the TF in the absence of M. Only at a ratio of 1000:1 was there a decrease in the TF to undeteetable levels. Similar results were obtained in the presence of M, except that the TF values were several logs lower, reflecting the previously observed reduction in TF in the presence of M, and the data were more variable. These preliminary studies suggested that M does not affect the degradation of DNA by DNase. However, the conditions used in these studies were not conducive to the enzymatic activity of DNase (e.g., no buffer and no Mg were added), which probably explains the low activity of DNase at DNase:DNA ratios below 1000:1. All of the above studies, with additional permutations, are being repeated. Furthermore, other clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite, attapulgite), with different cations on the exchange complex, will be evaluated in these and other transformation systems. ------- Of Si I -3 -2 PA/A -I (J o . I ------- l.c I I u 1 ------- J \J o 6.01 6.1 l.d . 3 ------- / \- r —.>-* a v> i i 1 1 i -3 -4 -/ i 0 1 i I i i 1 ------- VJ vu VJ V-0 ' \ o I ------- /F a i] i ns / r \^ 5 VU £ S ^ V- L//- o \ \ +-CAAY \ \ • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ------- G. Stotzky CR812484 Transduction Studies The initial transduction studies are being conducted with a temperature-sensitive strain of the generalized transducing bacteriophage, Pl::Cm cts. This strain is essentially temperate at 37 C and lytic at 42 C, carries a gene conferring resistance to chloramphenicol (Cm), has a broad host range, and in the prophage stage, remains autonomous in the cytoplasm, thereby mimicking plasmids and bridging to our earlier studies with true plasmids. Lysates of phage PI have been prepared by two methods: 1) heat induction of a lysogenic strain of Escherichia coli DU1040(P1) and 2) infection of E. coli W3110 with phage PI in liquid culture followed by heat induction of lysis. Both methods produced lysates containing liters as high as 10 PFU/ml. Lactose-positive strains of E. coli have been verified for the absence of phage PI and, if Ivsogenic for phage PI, have been cured. For example, E_. coli K802 was cured by growth at 30 C until log phase followed by culture at 42 C. The lysate was then plated on MacConkey Agar (MAC), incubated at 37 C, and resultant colonies were replica plated to MAC containing 30 ug/ml Cm. Colonies that appeared to be cured (i. e., growth on MAC but not on MAC + Cm) were subcultured on MAC and verified as E. coli by the Enterotube II system (Roche Diagnostics Inc.). These cultures will be verified as being cured of PI by their resistance to lysis at 42 C. Numerous strains of E_. coli that are nonlysogenic for phage PI are now available. The multiplicity of infection (MOD for the transduction of resistance to Cm by phage PI to E_. cob' W3110 m vitro was then determined, to provide guidelines for the ratios of the~phage and the~bacterium to be used in soil studies. The transduction frequencies for different MOIs were: MQI Transduction frequency (%) 9.5 6.6 x 10"1 6.6 5.1 x 10"; 2.7 4.8 x 10~; 0.27 <: 1.0 x lO'1* On the bases of these data, studies on transduction in soil have been initiated, using E_. coli W3110 and Pseudomonas fluorescens PAO1 and phage PI at an MOI of 3, in both sterile and nonsterile soil. These studies have been designed to determine the 1) survival of the recipient bacterial species, 2) survival of the phage, 3) transduction of introduced bacterial species, and 4) transduction of indigenous bacteria. As these studies have been initiated concurrent with the preparation of this biannual progress report, watch the annual report for the results of these and subsequent studies. ------- Publications supported, in part, by Cooperative Agreement No. CR812484 Stotzky, G. and Babich, H. 1986, Survival of, and genetic transfer by, genetically engineered bacteria in natural environments. In Advances in Applied Microbiology, A. I. Laskin, ed. Academic Press, N.Y. pp. 93-138 (in press). Stotzky, G. 1986. Influence of soil mineral colloids on metabolic processes, growth, adhesion, and ecology of microbes and viruses. In Interaction of Soil Minerals with Natural Organics and Microbes, P. M. Huang et al., eds. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 305-428 (in press). Devanas, M. A., Rafaeli-Eshkol, D., and Stotzky, G. 1986. Survival of plasmid-containing strains of Escherichia coli in soil: effect of plasmid size and nutrients on survival of hosts and maintenance of plasmids. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (in press). Devanas, M. A. and Stotzky, G. 1986. Fate in soil of a recombinant plasmid carrying a Drosophila gene. Current Microbiology (in press). Devanas, M. A., Harsell, C., Wu, C., and Stotzky, G. 1986. Plasmid transfer in Escherichia coli in sterile and nonsterile soil.. Abstract, Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology (in press). Stotzky, G. and Devanas, M. A. 1986. Fate and potential ecologic effects of genetically engineered microbes in soil. Abstract, International Congress of Soil Science (submitted). ------- 1986 ASM ANNUAL MEETING Washington, D.C. 23-28 March 1986 Official Abstract Form (Read all instructions before typing) ! .( ; Plasmid Transfer in Escherichia coli in Sterile ' ''. •>"ll's " ; and Nonsterile Soil. MONICA A. DEVANASl*. j 'CYNTHIA HARSELL1, CYNTHIA WU1, and G. STOTZKY2, Rutgers ! Univ., New Brunsvick, NJ1, and NYU, NY, NY2 | i Strains of E. coli [DUIOUO(pRR226), DU10^0(pDU202), • and PRCU8?, a lac+ C600] were introduced separately into sterile and nonsterile soil, with and without nutrients (5% Luria Broth). The numbers of colony forming units of in- troduced strains, transconjugants, and indigenous soil mi- . crobes were determined on nonselective and selective me- dia. The survival of the donor and recipient strains in . sterile soil was reduced under low moisture content (1.6%; .the -33 kPa potential was 25%} and low nutrient levels, (in- ' oculated in saline), which apparently limited the poten- tial for conjugation as none was observed. Plasmid trans- fer at a frequency of 10 transconjugants/recipient cell was observed in sterile soils at 25% moisture when nutri- ents were added. In nonsterile soil at 25% moisture and without nutrients, competition with indigenous soil mi- crobes reduced the survival of the donors and recipients, . and no plasmid transfer was observed. When nutrients were : added with the inoculum, there was a rapid growth of the introduced strains, during the first 2k h, but no plasmid transfer was observed, and the numbers of both donors and recipients subsequently declined rapidly. Instructions Indicate below the subject category number from the list on p. iv, check your poster or slide session preference, complete the check list on the reverse side of this sheet, and sign your name in the space provided. Indicate category number from page iv Category number Poster/Slide Session Preference , , Because of the flexibility in programming afforded by poster sessions, the Program Committee will attempt to schedule all abstracts which (i) are considered by elected divisional officers to be of acceptable quality and (ii) conform to rules established by the Program Committee. The decision of whether an abstract is scheduled in a slide or a poster session will be made by the elect- ed Program Committee, which will be guided (but not bound) by the preference of the authors. Approximately 75% of the abstracts will be scheduled in poster sessions. By submitting an abstract, the author agrees that the paper will be presented as scheduled. ~ . . Please check one: S Poster session preferred D Slide session preferred Q No preference Please provide telephone number of signing author (201 ) 932-8906 ' Area code " • vii ' ------- INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR ORAL EXPOSURE OF AVIAN SPECIES TO MICROBIAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS M. D. Knittel Toxics and Pesticides Branch Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Corvallis, Oregon ------- INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR ORAL EXPOSURE OF AVIAN SPECIES TO MICROBIAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS INTRODUCTION Registration of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MPCAs) under Subsection M of the Fungicide Insectide Rodenticide Act requires that the susceptibility of nontarget species be tested. Among the nontarget hosts chosen for testing are the avian species. The suggested test birds are either the Bobwhite quail or the Mallard duck. These avian species have been chosen largely because of the history of use in chemical toxicity testing and are adapted to laboratory rearing. This document will outline proposed test methods for oral exposure of birds to an MPCA and includes a summary of the observations of symptoms which must be made during the test. Wild bird populations will be orally exposed to MPCAs by consuming infested pests. The classic serial dilution of the pathogen to produce an LD5Q determination most likely will not be realized because the MPCA is being tested in a nontarget host. For this reason the proposal is to expose the test brids to a single high dose, based on the field application rate of the MPCA. The route chosen is oral inoculation. In this manner the MPCA is introduced directly into the alimentary canal. A large dose should provide every oppor- tunity for the MPCA pathogen to establish an infection, if it is capable. ------- Definitions of Terms Used in This Interim Protocol Dorsal: Located near or on back of an animal or one of its parts. Histopathology: A branch of pathology that deals with tissue changes associ- ated with disease. Indigeneous disease: Disease carried by the host and specific for the host. May be subclinical or in a carrier state. LDso: The dose of pathogen which is fatal to 50% of the test animals. Maximum hazardous dose: Doses of the MPCA should be multiples of maximum amount of active ingredient expected to be available to nontarget species in the environment. This amount can be based on the per acre application rate or amount of MPCA contained in the target host at the time of death. Necropsy: Autopsy, or examination of internal organs of the body to determine cause of death. Nephelometry: Measurement of numbers of particles by amount of light scatter- ing. Primary defense barriers: Outer dermal or mucous membranes of animal that act as a mechanical barrier to infection. Secondary defense barriers: Internal body mechanism against infection such as phagocytic cells and nonspecific immune responses. Target host: The host from which the MPCA was isolated and the one intended for control. Trituration: Grinding or crush as in a mortor with a pestle or in a tissue homogenerator. Ventral: On or belonging to lower or anterior surface of an animal, side opposite the back. Virulence: Disease-producing power of a microorganism. ------- Test Procedures A. Summary of Test: The test is designed to determine if the MPCA is infec- tive and/or pathogenic to avian species. Because the MPCA is pathogenic for hosts phylogenetically far removed from the test species, exposure is by a large dose administered by the direct oral route. The test species is either Bobwhite quail or the Mallard duck. These two species were chosen because colonies have been established for chemical toxicity research and are adapted to laboratory rearing. A single large dose is administered by oral gavage into the crop or preventriculus and the birds observed for death or illness due to infec- tion. If death or illness is observed, then a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and several groups of birds are orally inoculated to establish an LD5o. If death or illness is not observed, birds are sacrificed at the end of observation period and a necropsy performed and tissues taken for histopathology and isolation of the test MPCA. B. Test Species: Either Bobwhite quail or Mallard duck are suitable for the test. Both have been used for testing toxicity of chemicals and, there- fore, an extensive knowledge of laboratory rearing is available. An inhouse colony of known pedigeree and indigeneous disease history will be established. If test birds are purchased from a supplier, a disease free certification will be required. Birds for a single test will be of the same age, randomly selected, and placed in cages. Numbers of birds for each test should consist of a minimum of 10 for each dilution of the MPCA plus a control group. 1. Identification: Each bird will be identified with a leg band number. ------- 2. Husbandry: Current acceptable practices of good husbandry will be followed at all times (Case and Robel, 1974). 3. Temperature: Room temperature should be maintained at 25°C +_ 2°C. 4. Relative Humidity: Relative humidity of 30 to 80 percent will be maintained during study. Adequate ventilation will be by use of exhaust fans. 5. Feed: All birds will be provided a ration suitable for rearing or maintaining study species. The feed will be free of any antibiotic medication prior to and during study. Ration should be provided ad libitum. Feed consumption during the study will be recorded. 6. Water: Water will be available ad libitum during rearing and study. Water will be changed as often as required to provide potable water. During study of MPCA infection the amount of water used will be recorded. 7. Photoperiod: Light and dark period should be maintained at 12 h light 12 h dark. 8. Age: Birds for test will be at least 16 weeks old at the start of the experiment. C. Cages: Wire cages 30 x 24 x 10" are used to house the experimental quail. The cages should have wire floors to allow droppings to pass through to a catch pan beneath. Cages for Mallard ducks should be 27.5 x 39.25 x 9.5 inches for ducklings 14 days old and older. Adult duck require 5.4 square feet per bird which would be a cage about 7 times the size used for the young ducklings (192 x 276 x 66 inches). ------- D. Number of Birds In Treatment Groups: The number of test birds per treat- ment group should be no less than 10 with the same number in each control group. However, if the number of birds is increased the results become more statistically significant. The proposed acute exposure, maximum hazardous dose, require that a group of 10 birds inoculated orally with a number of the MPCA pathogen equivalent to some multiple of the per acre application rate or amount contained in target host at death. A control group would receive an equivalent inoculum which has been inactivated with heat (autoclaving, 15 Ibs/in2 248°F for 15 minutes). E. Preparation and quantification of inoculum Bacteria: Bacterial MPCAs are grown in a liquid medium that best supports growth, i.e., the medium for growth of Bacillus thuringiensis (Faust and Traverse, 1981). Temperature and aeration during incubation should be optimum for the bacterium under study to provide sufficient cell numbers at the end of the incubation time. The incubation time should also be optimum for the particular species of bacterium being studied. The bacterial cells should be removed from the culture medium by centrifugation at 10,000 RPM, 10 minutes at 4°C, and washed by resuspen- sion and sedimentation with phosphate buffered saline at least twice. The inculum size should be large and correspond to a multiple of the per acre application rate or that found in the target host at the time of death. Bacterial cell numbers should be adjusted to the above level either by standard bacterial plate count or by nephelometry. Fungi: Culture Growth and Quantisation: Growth of fungi culture for inoculation can follow that outline above for bacteria using appropriate 5 ------- medium, temperature, and aeration to obtain sufficient growth (Lewis e* al., 1958). If the spore is the infective stage, standardization will be by microscopic enumeration in a hemocytometer or by plate count of inoculum on appropriate medium. If the mycelium is the infective stage, then the inoculum should be quantitated by the dry weight of the harvested and washed mycelium. Virus: The inoculum for virus infectivity studies should be grown in cell culture if such a system is available. If not, the inoculum is prepared from host tissue by trituration and purified from cell debris by centrifu- gation. Bacterial contamination from the host may present problems upon inoculation into the test birds and should be suppressed by the use of antibiotics such as streptomycin and penicillin. If the virus is occluded, separate inoccula of occluded and non- occlued virus should be made and used in separate infectivity studies. Quantification of the virus inoculum can be based either on tissue culture infective doses (TCIDso), plaque assay, or lethal dose in the target host (Groner et^ a_L, 1984). Protozoan: The inoculum should be prepared from pure culture if possible. In this way, extraneous contaminating microorganisms can be eliminated or minimized. If it must be prepared from infected host, it should be prepared in such a manner as to eliminate contaminating microorganisms. This may be accomplished by repeated centrifugation followed by resuspen- sion and incubation of the inoculum with antibiotics to suppress or eliminate contaminating microorganisms. ------- Quantification of inoculum can be by direct microscopic count in a hemocytometer, or by 1059 determination in a susceptible host (Kudo, 1966). F. Oral Inoculation: The dose of MPCA will be administered by oral gavage with a syringe fitted with a stainless steel canula. Dose will be placed into crop or preventriculus. G. Post Inoculation Observation: 1. Time: The inoculated birds should be observed daily for signs of illness and any mortalities recorded. The length of observation period should be no less than 30 days. 2. Food and Water: Food and water should be provided ad lib. A daily measurement of the amount of food and water consumed during the observation period should be made. Signs of illness can be reflected in loss of appetite and increase in water consumption. Recovery from the illness will be seen in a recovery of appetite and drop in water consumption. 3. Signs: The inoculated birds should be observed daily for signs of illness. Among general symptoms of disease are the following: labored breathing, ruffled feathers, drooping wings, listlessness, head lowered, eyes closed, increased water consumption, mucous discharge from mouth, diarrhea, loss of weight, coughing, gasping, respiratory difficulty, and weakness. The control group should also be observed for similar signs and the two groups compared. ------- H. Necropsy: At the end of the observation period, all remaining birds should be sacrificed and a necropsy performed. The internal organs should be examined for any overt lesions. Samples of tissue should be removed for attempt to isolate the MPCA and for histopathological preparation and examination. I. Bioassay of Inoculum: It is recommended that the experimental inoculum be assayed in the target host at the same time as it is inoculated into the birds. This will assure that the inoculum has not lost any virulence due to preparation. J. Reporting: The sponsor should submit to the USEPA all data developed by the test that are suggestive or predictive of the infectivity of the MPCA for avian species. Included are any behavioral changes during the observation period, gross lesion of any internal organs, results of attempts to reisolate the MPCA from sampled organs, and results of the histopathologic examination of tissues. The reporting should follow the requirements set out in Part 792 of the "Good Laboratory Practice Standards" and should also include the following: 1. The name of the test, sponsor, testing laboratory, study director, principle investigator and dates of testing. 2. A detailed description of the test MPCA, such as type (virus, bacteria, etc.), source of inoculum (i.e., pure culture, infected host, etc.), preparation of inoculum, and standardization of the dose. Description should also include the type of resuspension fluid and its composition. 8 ------- 3. Detailed information about species of birds used in the test, their scientific name, source of test birds (supplier or in-house colony), and history of any indigenous disease. The sponsor should also include age of test subjects, ambient conditions, i.e., temperature, room lighting level, and photoperiod. 4. Description of the test cages, dimensions, number of test birds per cage, number of replicates per dilution of MPCA. 5. Number of MPCAs dosed into each bird and method of verification, microscopic count, plate count, or tissue culture infective doses. 6. The percentage of test birds affected by treatment at each observa- tion period must be recorded. 7. Results of bioassay of inoculum in the target host, time of first mortalities, time of last mortalities, and LD50 determination with statistical treatment must be required. 8. Any deviation from this test guidelines and anything unusual about the test, e.g., temperature fluctuations, disease problems in flock, etc. must be reported. ------- References Surges, H. D., G. Croizer, and J. Huber. 1980. A review of safety tests on baculovi ruses. Entomophaga £5_, 329-340. Case, R. M., and R. J. Robel. 1974. Bioenergetics of the bobwhite. J. Wild. Manage. 38, 638-652. Faust, R. M., and R. S. Travers. 1981. Occurrence of resistance to neomycin and kanamycin in Bacillus popilliae and certain senotypes of Bacillus thuringiensis: Mutation potential in sensitive strains. J. Invert. Path. 34, 113-116. Groner, A., R. R. Granados, and J. P. Burand. 1984. Interaction of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus with two nonpermissive cell lines. Invervirol. 2U 203-209. Kudo, R. R. 1966. Protozoology. Chapter 43. pp. 1057-1088. Charles C. Thomas Publisher. Springfield, Illinois. 5th ed. Lewis, G. M., M. E. Hopper, J. W. Wilson, and 0. A. Plunkett. 1958. Introduc- tion to medical mycology. Year Book Publishers, Inc. Chicago, Illinois. pp. 382-418. 4th ed. 10 ------- INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR INTRAVENEOUS EXPOSURE OF AVIAN SPECIES TO MICROBIAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS M. D. Knittel Toxics and Pesticides Branch Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory Corvallis, Oregon ------- INTERIM PROTOCOL FOR INTRAVENEOUS EXPOSURE OF AVIAN SPECIES TO MICROBIAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS INTRODUCTION Registration of Microbial Pest Control Agents (MPCAs) under Subsection M of the Fungicide Insectide Rodenticide Act requires that the susceptibility of nontarget species be tested. The avian species are among the nontarget hosts chosen for testing. The suggested test species is either the Bobwhite quail or the Mallard duck. These avian species have been chosen largely because of their history of use in chemical toxicity testing and their adaptability to laboratory rearing. This document will outline proposed methods of exposing the test birds to the MPCA, route of inoculation, and observation of symptoms during the test. Because the MPCAs are microbial pathogens, but being tested in nontarget species, effects may be limited to symptoms other than overt mortality. The classic serial dilution of the pathogen to produce an LD50 determination will probably not be possible. For this reason, the experiments will expose the test birds to a high dosage of the MPCA by the most direct route: intravenous inoculation. This introduces the MPCA directly into the blood stream, bypass- ing the primary barriers of body defenses and allows it access to the internal organs. A large dose would overwhelm the secondary body defense mechanisms, providing an opportunity to establish an infection, if it is pathogenic to the avian species. ------- Definitions of Terms Used in This Interim Protocol Dorsal: Located near or on back of an animal or one of its parts. Histopathology: A branch of pathology that deals with tissue changes associ- ated with disease. Indigeneous disease: Disease carried by the host and specific for the host. May be subclinical or in a carrier state. Intravenous: Located within or going into the veins. LD50: The dose of pathogen which is fatal to 50% of the test animals. Maximum hazardous dose: Doses of the MPCA should be multiples of maximum amount of the per acre field active ingredient expected to be available to the nontarget species in the environment. This amount can be based on the per acre application rate or amount of MPCA contained in a target host at time of death. Necropsy: Autopsy, or examination of internal organs of the body to determine cause of death. Nephelometry: Measurement of numbers of particles by amount of light scatter- ing. Primary defense barriers: Outer dermal or mucous membranes of animal that act as a mechanical barrier to infection. Secondary defense barriers: Internal body mechanism active against infection such as phagocytic cells and nonspecific immune responses. Target host: The host from which the MPCA was isolated and the one intended for control. Trituration: Grinding or crushing as in a mortor with a pestle or in a tissue homogenator. Ventral: On or belonging to lower or anterior surface of an animal, side opposite the back. ------- Virulence: Disease-producing power of a microorganism. Test Procedures A. Summary of Test: The test is designed to determine if the MPCA is infec- tive and/or pathogenic to avian species. Because the MPCA is pathogenic for hosts phylogenetically far removed from the test species, exposure will be by a large (maximum) dose administered by a direct route such as intravenous (I.V.). The test species is either Bobwhite quail or the Mallard duck. These two species were chosen because colonies have been established for chemical toxicity research and they are adapted to labora- tory rearing. A single large dose is injected I.V. into the wing vein and the birds observed for death or illness due to infection. If death or illness is observed, then a serial dilution of the MPCA is made and several groups of birds are injected I.V. to establish an LD5Q. If death or illness is not observed, birds are sacrificed at the end of the observation period, a necropsy performed, and tissues taken for histopathology and isolation of the test MPCA. B. Test Species: Either Bobwhite quail or Mallard duck are suitable for the test. Since both have been used for testing toxicity of chemicals, an extensive knowledge of laboratory rearing exists. An inhouse colony of known pedigree and indigenous disease history will be established. If test birds are purchased from a supplier, a disease free certification will be required. Birds for a single test will be of the same age, randomly selected, and placed in cages. Numbers of ------- birds for each test should consist of a minimum of 10 for each dilution of the MPCA plus a control group. 1. Identification; Each bird will be identified with leg band number. 2. Husbandry: Current acceptable practices of good husbandry will be followed at all times (Case and Robel, 1974). 3. Temperature: Room temperature should be maintained at 25°C, +_ 2°C. 4. Relative Humidity; Relative humidity of 30 to 80 percent will be maintained during study. Adequate ventilation will be assured by use of exhaust fans. 5. Feed: All birds will be provided a ration suitable for rearing or maintaining study species. The feed will be free of any antibiotic medication prior to and during the study. Rations should be provided ad libitum. Feed consumption during the study will be recorded. 6. Water: Water will be available ad libitum during rearing and study. Water will be changed as often as required to provide potable water. During study of MPCA infection the amount of water used will be recorded. 7. Photoperiod: Light and dark period will be maintained at 12 h light 12 h dark. 8. Age: Birds for test will be at least 16 weeks old at the start of the experiment. C. Cages: Wire cages 30 x 24 x 10" are used to house the experimental quail. The cages should have wire floors to allow droppings to pass through to a catch pan beneath. Cages for Mallard ducks should be 27.5 x 39.25 x 9.5 inches for ducklings 14 days old. Adult ducks require 5.4 square feet per ------- bird which would be a cage about 7 times the size used for the young ducklings (192 x 276 x 66 inches). D. Number of Birds in Treatment Groups: The number of test birds per treat- ment group should be no less than 10, with the same number in each control group. However, a larger number of birds will increase the statistical significance of the results. The proposed acute exposure, maximum hazardous dose, requires that a group of 10 birds be injected intraven- ously with a number of the MPCA pathogen equivalent to 10 to 100 times the per acre rate applied to a 70 kg man. A control group would receive an equivalent inoculum which has been inactivated with heat (autoclaving, 15 Ibs/in2 248°F for 15 minutes). E. Preparation and Quantification of Inoculum Bacteria: Bacterial MPCAs are grown in a liquid medium that best supports growth, i.e., the medium for growth of Bacillus thuringiensis (Faust and Traverse, 1981). Temperature and aeration during incubation should be optimum for the bacterium under study to provide sufficient cell numbers at the end of the incubation time. The incubation time should also be optimum for the particular species of bacterium being studied. The bacterial cells should be removed from the culture medium by centrifugation at 10,000 RPM, 10 minutes at 4°C, and washed by resuspen- sion and sedimentation with phosphate buffered saline at least twice. The inoculum size should be large and correspond to a multiple of the per acre application dose or amount contained in host at death. Bacterial cell numbers should be adjusted to the above level either by standard bacterial plate count or by nephelometry. ------- Fungi: Culture Growth and Quantification: Growth of fungi for inocula- tion can follow that outlined above for bacteria using appropriate medium, temperature, and aeration to obtain sufficient growth (Lewis et al., 1958). If the spore is the infective stage, standardization will be by microscopic enumeration in a hemocytometer or by plate count of inoculum on appropriate medium. If the mycelium is the infective stage, then the inoculum should be quantitated by the dry weight of the harvested and washed mycelium. Virus: The inoculum for virus infectivity studies should be grown in cell culture if such a system is available. If not, the inoculum is prepared from host tissue by trituration and purified from cell debris by centrifu- gation. Bacterial contamination from the host may present problems upon inoculation into the test birds and should be suppressed by the use of antibiotics such as streptomycin and penicillin. If the virus is occluded, separate inoccula of occluded and non- occlued virus should be made, and used in separate infectivity studies. Quantification of the virus inoculum can be based either on tissue culture infective doses (TCID5o), plaque assay, or lethal dose in the target host (Groner e£ _al_., 1984). Protozoan: If the protozoan can be cultured, the inoculum should be prepared in such a manner. If, however, it must be prepared from infected host, it should be prepared in such a manner as to eliminate contaminating microorganisms. This may be accomplished by repeated centrifugation followed by resuspension and incubation of the inoculum with antibiotics to suppress or eliminate contaminating microorganisms. 6 ------- Quantification of inoculum can be by direct microscopic count in a hemocytometer, or by LD50 determination in a susceptible host (Kudo, 1966). F. Intravenous Injection: The ventral wing vein of the bird is the most convenient for injection. The vein is exposed by plucking the feathers from the underside of the wing. The vein lies in a depression between the biceps brachial and tricepts humerials muscles. The vein becomes more visable if the skin surface is wetted with 70% alcohol. Both wings are extended dorsally and gripped together firmly with one hand in the area of the wing web. Surface of the skin over the vein is sterilized with tincture of iodine (20 grams iodine and 24 grams potassium iodide per 1000 mis of distilled water). A needle (3/4" 20 ga) is inserted into the vein in opposite direction of the blood flow. The plunger of the syringe is slowly depressed to expel 1 the inoculum and the needle withdrawn. A cotton ball or gauze square soaked with tincture of iodine is held on the puncture side until bleeding stops (Zandler, 1983). G. Post Inoculation Observation: 1. Time: The inoculated birds should be observed daily for signs of illness and any mortalities recorded. The length of observation period should be no less than 30 days. 2. Food and Water: Food and water should be provided ad lib. A daily measurement of the amount of food and water consumed during the observation period should be made. Sign of illness are reflected in loss of appetite and thirst. Recovery from the illness will be seen in a recovery of appetite and drop in water consumption. 7 ------- 3. Signs: The inoculated birds should be observed daily for signs of illness. Among general symptoms of disease are the following: labored breathing, ruffled feathers, drooping wings, listlessness, head lowered, eyes closed, increased water consumption, mucous discharge from mouth, diarrhea, loss of weight, coughing, gasping, respiratory difficulty, and weakness. The control group should also be observed and the two groups compared. H. Necropsy: At the end of the observation period all of the birds should be sacrificed and a necropsy performed. The internal organs should be examined for any overt lesions. Samples of tissue should be removed for attempts to isolate the MPCA and for histopathological preparation and examination. I. Bioassay of Inoculum: It is recommended that the experimental inoculum be assayed in the target host at the same time as it is inoculated into the birds. This will assure that the inoculum has not lost any virulence due to preparation. J. Reporting: The sponsor should submit to the USEPA all data developed by the test that are suggestive or predictive of the infectivity of the MPCA for avian species. Included are to any behavioral changes during the observation period, gross lesions on any internal organs, results of attempts to reisolate the MPCA from sampled organs, and results of the histopathologic examination of tissues. The reporting should follow the requirements set out in Part 792 of the "Good Laboratory Practice Standards" and should also include the following: 8 ------- 1. The name of the test, sponsor, testing laboratory, study director, principle investigator and dates of testing. 2. A detailed description of the test MPCA, such as type (virus, bacteria, etc.), source of inoculum (i.e., pure culture, infected host, etc.), preparation of inoculum, and standardization of the dose. Description should also include the type of resuspension fluid and its composition. 3. Detailed information about species of birds used in the test, their scientific name, source of test birds (supplier or in-house colony), and history of any indigenous disease. The sponsor should also include age of test subjects, ambient conditions, i.e., temperature, room lighting level, and photoperiod. 4. Description of the test cages, dimensions, number of test birds per cage, number of replicates per dilution of MPCA. 5. Number of MPCAs injected into each bird and method of verification, microscopic count, plate count, or tissue culture infective doses must be indicated. 6. The percentage of test birds affected by treatment at each observa- tion period must be recorded. 7. Results of bioassay of inoculum in the target host, time of first mortalities, time of last mortalities, and 1050 determination with statistical treatment must be provided. 8. Any deviation from this test guidelines and anything unusual about the test, e.g., temperature fluctuations, disease problems in flock, etc. must be reported. ------- References Surges, H. D., G. Croizer, and J. Huber. 1980. A review of safety tests on baculoviruses. Entomophaga £5, 329-340. Case, R. M., and R. J. Robel. 1974. Bioenergetics of the bobwhite. J. Wild. Manage. 38, 368-652. Faust, R. M., and R. S. Travers. 1981. Occurrence of resistance to neomycin and kanamycin in Bacillus popilliae and certain senotypes of Bacillus thuringiensis: Mutation potential in sensitive strains. J. Invert. Path. 34, 113-116. Groner, A., R. R. Granados, and J. P. Burand. 1984. Interaction of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus with two nonpermissive cell lines. Invervirol. _21_t 203-209. Kudo, R. R. 1966. Protozoology. Chapter 43. pp. 1057-1088. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher. Springfield, Illinois. 5th ed. Lewis, G. M., M. E. Hopper, J. W. Wilson, and 0. A. Plunkett. 1958. Introduc- tion to medical mycology. Year Book Publishers, Inc. Chicago, Illinois. pp. 382-418. 4th ed. Zandler, D. V. 1983. Diseases of Poultry. Ed by M. S. Hofstad, B. W. Calnek, C. F. Humbolt, W. M. Reid, and H. W. Yoder, Jr. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. p. 30. 10 ------- ASSESSMENT OF METHODS FOR THE DETECTION, IDENTIFICATION, AND ENUMERATION OF GENETICALLY-ENGINEERED BACTERIA IN SOIL ITEM 6940A FEBRUARY, 1986 ------- Assessment of Methods for the Detection, Identification, and Enumeration of Genetically-Engineered Bacteria in Soil PETER G. HARTEL Department of Agronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602* INTRODUCTION 2 The nature of soil and rhizosphere 3 Preliminary considerations to soil and rhizosphere methods 3 METHODS OF ENUMERATION 5 Fluorescent antibody 5 Plate counts with selective agents 8 Most-probable-number 10 DNA probes 11 COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ENUMERATION 14 METHODS OF DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION 17 Phage typing 17 Intrinsic antibiotic resistance 17 Other serological methods 18 CONCLUSION 18 LITERATURE CITED 20 * This report represents the opinion of the author. It carries no official endorsement by the University of Georgia. ------- INTRODUCTION Recent interest in the deliberate or inadvertent release of genetically- engineered microorganisms to the environment (2) raises questions about the ability to detect, identify, and enumerate these microorganisms in order to ascertain their growth, survival, and potential ecological effects. This report is an assessment of the methods for the detection, identification, and enumeration of genetically-engineered bacteria in soil. Because only a few papers involve genetically-engineered bacteria in soil, general methods for the study of soil bacteria are included here as well. Methods of enumeration are considered first because these methods are the most developed and likely to prove the most useful. Methods of detection and identification are considered in a later section. Detection is distinguished here from identification because in some of the discussed methods, bacteria can be detected without identification. Methods involving total microbial community studies, such as biomass and activity measurements, which do not differentiate one bacterium from another are not considered. This is a realization that the primary need in the release of genetically-engineered bacteria into soil is to study a particular bacterial strain and not the microbial community at large. Methods of enumeration in soil generally fall into two categories: direct and indirect. Direct methods identify bacteria by some form of microscopy (visible light, scanning electron, transmission electron, epifluorescence, fluorescent antibody), whereas indirect methods employ some form of viable counting procedure (dilution plate counts with or without selective agents, most-probable-number analysis). DNA probe methods are not yet sufficiently evolved and currently both direct and indirect methods are in use. Of the direct methods, only the fluorescent antibody and DNA probes can ------- differentiate one bacterium from another, so these are the only direct methods considered. This paper will seek to identify advantages and disadvantages of • each method before finally comparing all the methods. The nature of soil and rhizosphere r~ Soil is probably the most complex environment in which bacteria can exist. This is because soil is dominated by a solid phase of different-sized particles surrounded by liquid and gas phases which fluctuate greatly in time and space (85). Consequently the diversity, activity, and numbers of bacteria in soil also fluctuate greatly in time and space. Thus, it must be understood that any method of detection, identification, and enumeration of bacteria in soil has the capacity to represent but a small fraction of the soil's heterogeneity. The rhizosphere, the zone of microbial stimulation under the influence of plant roots, is a natural subset of the soil habitat. It is important because 1) numbers of bacteria are higher here than in the surrounding soil (34) as a consequence of chemically heterogeneous organic materials released in root exudates (28), and 2) the rhizosphere presents some distinct problems for the detection, identification, and enumeration of bacteria. For example, bacteria may be present under a mucilaginous sheath on the root surface (48, 75) or invade and colonize root cortical tissue (24). It is still unknown whether rhizosphere populations of bacteria are best quantified in terms of surface area or on a root weight basis. These and other problems have led some authors to state that a precise determination of bacteria in the rhizosphere is not yet possible (35). Preliminary considerations to soil and rhizosphere methods Regardless of the method use to detect, identify, or enumerate soil bacteria, many important preliminary steps in the proper handling of the soil ------- must be considered. First, in the case of sieved soil, a 2-mm sieve should be used because it conforms with the arbitrary upper size limit used in soil • analyses (13). It is important to mix this soil thoroughly. James and Sutherland (47) found significant differences between aliquot samples from a supposedly well-mixed sieved soil. If a soil is not sieved, the soil samples should be as homogenous as possible with as much replication as possible to reduce sampling error (90). Second, it is impossible to store soil samples longer than a few hours without quantitative and qualitative changes occurring within the microflora (50), so soil samples should be processed as quickly as possible. This is particularly important in avoiding changes of soil water potential. Third, when soil is suspended in a diluent, it is important to standardize this procedure, because different cell aggregates are not dispersed or destroyed with equal ease (49). Finally, in the case of inoculated non- sterile soils, inoculation densities for determining bacterial growth or survival should be reasonable. The author strongly supports the concept of a soil threshold for bacterial numbers (20). For example, protozoan predation o may be significant at bacterial inoculation densities of 10 cells per g of soil, but not at densities of 10 cells per g of soil (40). Thus, an environ- mental effect is observed at high bacterial inoculation densities that would not normally occur if the densities were more reasonable. In the case of rhizosphere, what is or is not rhizosphere soil must be carefully defined because definitions of what constitutes rhizosphere soil vary. Generally rhizosphere soil is defined as soil still adhering to the roots after removal of the plant from the soil (60). Although it is still difficult to determine the amount of this rhizosphere soil, the dry weight of the soil can be estimated (41). ------- METHODS OF ENUMERATION Fluorescent Antibody * The fluorescent antibody (FA) technique is a method in which fluorescent markers are attached to the antibody proteins for visualizing a antigen-antibody reaction. Excellent extensive reviews of the theory and principles of this technique already exist (37, 54). In the direct FA technique, the specific antibody against the bacterium of interest is labelled, whereas in the indirect method, the specific antibody against the bacterium of interest is unlabelled and a second labelled antibody against the first antibody is then required to visualize the antigen-antibody reaction. The direct technique has an advantage of simplicity because only one antibody reagent is involved, whereas the indirect technique has an advantage of a brighter fluorescent label (54). The FA technique has three primary advantages: 1) The technique can identify a bacterium that is otherwise difficult to work with or to isolate. An example is the extensive work in soil (32) and in rhizosphere (73) with the chemoautotrophic nitrifier Nitrobacter which until the advent of immunofluorescent methods was usually enumerated by a most- probable-number method (3). 2) The technique is useful for showing spatial relationships, particularly in rhizosphere where little is known about the soil's micro- and macrostructure (51). 3) Assuming antisera are available, the technique is fast. The disadvantages of the FA technique are extensively reviewed elsewhere (12, 80) and are summarized below: 1) The specificity of the FA reaction must be studied for each bacterium of interest. The number of strains or species necessary to satisfy this requirement varies with each experiment, depending on the experimental objectives, the ------- specificity pattern that emerges, and the information already known about the serology of the organism. Monoclonal antibodies will be useful in offering greater specifity for the FA technique in the future, but as yet ttiey have not been extensively employed for soil. 2) Although the use of rhodamine gelatin as a primary stain (10) lias effectively eliminated non-specific staining of soil particles and organic matter, and the use of a combination irgalan black (45) or india ink and rhodamine gelatin prestaining has effectively eliminated problems with membrane filter auto-, fluorescence, plant autofluorescence continues to be a problem for some rhizosphere studies. For example, Diem et al. (22) were unable to eliminate the autofluorescence of rice roots, whereas Schank et al. (79) were more fortunate in that autofluorescence was prominent in the stelar portion of a grass root, but not in the mucigel area where most of the bacteria were located. 3) The FA technique cannot differentiate between living and dead cells as both fluoresce brightly and specifically. One alternative is to simultaneously measure metabolically active bacteria by autoradiography (32) or to use a tetrazolium dye which reduces to optically-dense, dark red spots in actively respiring bacteria (93). The length of time that a nonviable cell fluoresces varies with the cell and the environment. Nonviable cells generally fragment and clear within a 1-2 week period (11), but this would not be the case in soils with low water potential. 4) The practical lower limit of detectability of the FA technique is only O / fair, about 10 -10 cells per g of soil (Table 1). In an effort to improve the original Breed slide method (10 |JL of a 1:10 soil dilution spread on 1.0 2 6 cm slide surface) which requires a bacterial population of 10 cells per g of soil to see one antigen cell per microscope field and where only a limited amount of soil or soil dilution could be observed before the antigen of interest ------- Table 1. Lowest bacterial density observed in some selected papers using the FA technique. Organism Soil (S) or Lowest density reported, Reference Rhizosphere (R) log no. cells/g of soil Rhizobium japonicum Rhizobium japonicum Rhizobium japonicum Rhizobium japonicum Rhizobium japonicum Beijerinckia sp. chickpea Rhizobium Nitrobacter spp. Nitrobacter winogradskyi Nitrobacter sp. Escherichia coli S S S R R S S S S R S -3.54 4.71 -3.54 3.61 3.15 5.08 -3.00 3.52 4.38 3.95 4.57 20 29 88 80 74 21 55 33 72 73 81 ------- was obscured, Schmidt (81) developed a method to desorb the bacteria from the soil particles with a surfactant, separate the bacteria from soil colloid, and * collect the bacteria on membrane filters. Although subsequent development of simple soil blending-centrifugation procedures (5, 6, 30, 91) and use of different diluents (6, 55, 70) have improved bacterial recovery from soil, the results still vary greatly with soil texture and bacterial strains. Plate counts with selective agents Before considering dilution plate counts with selective agents, it is important to consider the plate count method in general because the latter provides the foundation on which the former exists. The method in general has the advantages of being inexpensive and easy to perform. But despite appear- ances, the method is subject to large experimental errors and it is not easy to evaluate the results unless the technique is given the greatest care (50). For example, certain correctable errors need to be taken into consideration. These errors are 1) accounting for the autoclave loss of the amount of diluent, and 2) avoiding long settling times between dilutions that can significantly decrease counts (46). The disadvantages of this method are extensively reviewed elsewhere (46, 49) and are summarized below: 1) Plate counts do not mimic the natural environment or show spatial relation- ships of the soil and bacteria in vivo. Although plate counts were initially criticized because most soil bacteria are short coccoid rods, a morphology that was not necessarily shared by the bacteria observed on soil dilution plates (18), it now seems reasonable that this is a response to starvation (56). For example, Rhizobium japonicum are known to lose their bacillus-like shape and acquire a coccoid-like form in soil (20). ------- 2) The method needs greater replication to achieve the same precision as the fluorescent antibody technique. 3) A proportional decrease in the number of colonies on a plate is never obtained in a soil dilution series (63). In a soil diluted 1:10, the number of colonies on a plate usually decreases only in a ratio of 1:5. rThis is primarily because of adsorption of bacteria to the inner walls of the pipettes. Furthermore, this proportional decrease is not linear because of increasing dispersion of the suspension with increasing dilution (49). 4) For spread plates, bacteria can adhere to the spreader when spreading the inoculum over the agar surface; for pour plates, colonies may coalesce if too close together making counting difficult, or the heat from the molten agar during pouring could cause lower counts. 5) Plate counts are difficult to standardize. Unless plate counts are performed on the same soil at the same time under the same strict standardized conditions, the results will show significant differences among different laboratories (27). 6) As mentioned in the Introduction, the presence of mucigel layers in the rhizosphere or bacterial invasion of the endorhizosphere may cause under- estimation of bacterial counts in these type of studies. For example, vigorous washing of Paspalum notatum removed little nitrogenase activity associated with Azotobacter paspali of the roots (23). The degree of selectivity of the plate counts is seldom sufficient to allow enumeration of any bacterium of interest in the presence of closely related types (71). To overcome this, inhibitors such as antibiotics, dyes, or other selective compounds are added to the plate count medium and natural mutants of the wild-type bacterium are selected that are resistant to that selective compound. Thus, the method allows greater selectivity with a concomitant ------- 10 increase in the ability to detect lower numbers of the bacterium of interest. Another minor advantage is that nothing needs to be sterilized (17). This method has widespread use and more recently has been proposed as a "technique for isolating bacteria of potential use in genetic engineering (59, 62). Two preconditions are assumed for this method: 1) development of a dependence to the selective compound is avoided by keeping the stock cultures of resistant mutants on the appropriate medium without the compound, and 2) the resistance of the bacterium to two compounds is preferable to one, not only to avoid naturally occurring resistant bacteria in the soil, but also to lower the potential for genetic exchange of the resistance markers to other bacteria in the soil. Otherwise, the technique has the following specific disadvantages: 1) The mutant and wild type organism may not behave similarly. For example, high level antibiotic resistance may confer symbiotic changes in Rhizobium (15), result in the loss of pathogenicity for some plant pathogens (9, 77), or cause plasmid loss (42). 2) In the case of antibiotics as a selective agent, not all antibiotics are suitable as markers, thus limiting the number of strains that can be labelled with different markers (82). 3) For some slow-growing bacteria that exist in low densities in the soil, fungal contamination is difficult to suppress. The more recent use of a variety of different fungicides (17, 39) may help to eliminate this. Most-Probable-Number The most-probable-number (MPN) technique is basically an extinction dilution method (1) that estimates the density of organisms based on the highest probability of the observed results (19). Enrichment is accomplished by withholding or adding a specific nutrient or growth factor, adding a toxic material, or altering some other chemical or physical factor to the advantage ------- 11 of the desired microorganism. Thus, the desired bacterium grows at a faster rate than the unwanted bacteria (18). In some cases, a bacterial species can • be enumerated by a plant infection MPN (89). The MPN technique makes three assumptions: 1) the bacteria are randomly distributed in the diluent, 2) the presence of one or more bacteria in a tube always gives a positive response, and 3) the organism possesses a unique and detectable metabolic reaction in order to be selected. The MPN method shares the same advantages and disadvantages of the selective plate count as well as several unique advantages and disadvantages. Compared to a plate count method, an MPN method has advantages of allowing enumeration of bacteria for which a suitable solid medium does not exist and allowing enumeration of bacteria that exist at too low a density for counting on a plate. The disadvantages of the MPN technique are: 1) If the specificity is not great enough, false positives are a problem. 2) The MPN technique is always less precise than a colony count (86). Also, the standard deviations and confidence limits are too large for accurate determinations of small but potentially important population fluctuations (72). To improve the precision of the technique, smaller dilution ratios or more tubes per dilution can be done, but the number of manipulations and time involved to do this limit its value. DNA Probes A DNA probe is useful for screening a large number of bacterial colonies for a specified DNA sequence or genes (38) and can be used for any bacterial species in which a DNA sequence unique to the organism of interest can be isolated (31). This method has recently been used for enumeration of bacteria in food (43, 44), feces (47), and pond sediment (78). Briefly, the method involves 1) isolating the bacteria, 2) lysing the bacteria to obtain their DNA, 3) denaturing the DNA, 4) fixing the DNA to a nitrocellulose filter, 5) ------- 12 hybridizing a radioisotope-labelled homologous section of DNA containing the sequence of genes of interest to the denatured DNA, and 6) assaying the amount • of hybridization by autoradiography. The steps are given here because depending on the method, some of the steps are interchangeable. If the original bacteria are required, colonies must be grown and copies made by replica plating. The methodology of DNA probes for enumeration is still in its infancy, so it is difficult to ascertain the advantages and disadvantages because both direct and indirect methods of enumeration are currently in use. The indirect method shares many of the advantages and disadvantages of selective plate counts, whereas the direct method shares many of the advantages and disadvantages of fluorescent antibody. Before these methods are considered, all DNA probe methods share several common preconditions and disadvantages. These are: 1) The probes require removal of any nonspecific DNA sequences from the gene of interest to minimize background hybridization (7). 2) The range of probe specificity on the general microbial population must be assessed. It is possible that a number of species might possess DNA homologous with the DNA probe (26, 31). Partial homology has been observed between the probe for heat-labile, toxin-producing Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae (53, 68). The disadvantages in common are: 32 1) All the current papers on DNA probes use P as the radioisotope of choice. 32 Unfortunately, the short half-life of P necessitates frequent probe relabelling and close monitoring of specific activity (57). Stable, nonisotopic DNA probes are expected to solve this problem in the future (31), but they have yet to be tested. 2) Although the likelihood is small, hybridization with other sequences in the bacterial genome cannot be ruled out (7). ------- 13 An indirect method of using DNA probes was adopted by Sayler et al. (78) and Echevarria et al. (26). In the first paper, the general bacterial population • in a pond sediment was targeted for the presence of toluene- and naphthalene- degrading genes. The^method was indirect because bacterial colonies were isolated from sediment samples that were diluted and plated on a minimal medium amended with toluene and naphthalene. In the second paper, E. coli in water was targeted for the presence of three enterotoxin genes. Water samples were filtered and the filters placed on MacConkey medium from which bacterial isolates were obtained. The method worked in both papers, but the papers clearly demonstrated the technique was still in its developmental stages. These and other related papers include many recommendations for increasing the sensitivity of the method: the use of high copy number plasmids and greater gene specificity (78), higher specific activity of the probe (31), the use of a simple steaming step to increase DNA binding to the nitrocellulose filters (61), and the use of a more highly selective medium (44). The last recommenda- tion is difficult to ascertain because the limit of sensitivity of the method is determined in part by the number of cells that can be placed on a filter to allow sufficient growth so that positive cells may be detected (43). Thus, Sayler et al. (78) were able to achieve a high probe sensitivity of 1 colony per 10 nonhomologous background colonies, whereas Hill et al. (44) were able to recover only 13% of Yersinia enterocolitica from a ratio of 1,820 nonvirulent cells to 1 virulent cell. Furthermore, all these experiments have used bacteria with relatively fast growth rates. These limits of detectability may not be as good for bacteria with slower growth rates because of overgrowth. Thus, the use of selective media may or may not be warranted depending on the experimental conditions. In a direct method of using DNA probes, Kuritza and Salyers (57) enumerated Bacteroides vulgatus in feces using a chromosomal fragment of that bacterium ------- 14 as a gene probe. No bacterial colonies were isolated. This method clearly identifies the major advantage of the direct method: the difficult methodological * problems of isolating and enumerating obligate anaerobes were avoided. In addition, another advantage was that the samples could be frozen and assayed when convenient. The disadvantages were: 1) the method could not distinguish between viable and nonviable cells, although this is not such a problem with feces, 2) the interference of fecal material necessitates additional centrifugation steps and the need for an internal standard to correct for the remaining interference, and 3) the method requires that the bacteria be well- represented in the DNA mixture (>2%). It was suggested this could be improved by solution hybridization but this was not tested. This direct technique has yet to be tested on soil. Amplification of the sensitivity to obtain a lower limit of detectibility will be a major problem because B. vulgatus numbers exceed 10 cells per g dry weight of feces whereas such numbers of a single bacterial species in soil do not exist. The direct method will certainly share the same problem of immunofluorescence in trying to separate bacteria or even the DNA (87) from soil. COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ENUMERATION Before considering the advantages and disadvantages of the methods of enumeration, it is important to realize the fundamental differences between direct and indirect methods. Under normal circumstances, direct microscopic bacterial counts are 10- to 100-fold higher than plate counts (30, 75). These differences have not been specifically elucidated, but are probably because 1) microscopy includes dead as well as live bacterial cells, 2) some bacterial cells in soil are either alive but sufficiently debilitated and unable to multiply and form colonies on the plating medium (50) or alive but do not grow on artificial media because of unknown nutritional and physiological needs, ------- 15 and 3) problems of obtaining complete dispersal of the bacteria in the soil suspension for counting. The latter is important because bacteria are not • randomly dispersed in soil (18) and in rhizosphere (69) but are aggregated in clumps and patches interpersed with areas where bacteria are sparse or absent. Direct counting techniques can use harsher and more effective desbrption and disruption techniques than indirect counting methods because bacterial cell integrity and not viability is important (72). Differences can become even larger if the bacterial population is sufficiently debilitated. Xu et al. (92) noted a dramatic 6-log difference in cell density between fluorescent antibody and culturable counts for Vibrio cholerae in a marine habitat. It is also interesting to note that in cases of good agreement between a direct and indirect method, this often occurs in sterile soil or in the beginning stages of an experiment before the bacteria can adapt to the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of soil. For example, a close agreement between fluorescent antibody counts and viable plate counts occurred for Rhizobium japonicum (81) and a chickpea Rhizobium strain (55) in sterile soil. Differ- ences may even appear between indirect methods if the degree of stress is different. Bushby (17) observed no difference between a plant infection MPN and antibiotic resistance plate counts in the beginning of an experiment but considerable difference after 24 days. It is clear that not enough is known about bacterial stresses in soil, particularly starvation, to explain why differences between direct and indirect methods should persist. Indirect procedures (plate counts, MPN) offer advantages of low cost, both in terms of startup and routine laboratory testing, and the ability to distinguish between live and dead cells. The indirect method of DNA probes offers the latter but not the former. Direct procedures (FA, direct DNA probes) offer advantages of mimicking the natural environment, and the ability ------- 16 to work with organisms which are difficult to isolate. In terms of statistics, plate counts are statistically superior to the MPN procedure (86). Direct microscopy is statistically superior to plate counts because the latter method has a three-fold larger coefficient of variation for the same replication (75). Yet the standard error of plate counts can be reduced by one-third to equal the error of direct microscopy but this entails a nine-fold increase in plate count replication and a concomitant increase in time. One of the most important differences between direct and indirect methods is the ability to detect low bacterial cell densities. For the FA technique, 3 4 the lowest practical detectable limit is 10 to 10 cells per g of soil, whereas MPN and plate counts with selective agents can detect as low as 10 cells per g of soil. The limit for the indirect method of DNA probes would be the same as selective plate counts whereas the direct method has not been tried on soil. Thus, the method of choice here would be any indirect method. All of the methods of enumeration share one more major disadvantage in common: all the methods are time-consuming and tedious. Fortunately, all the methods can be made less time-consuming and tedious. In the case of the FA technique, a fully automated device already exists for clinical specimens (66). For the MPN method, the use of microtiter plates (76) offers greater statistical precision by using more tubes per dilution and a smaller dilution rate, while saving time and media. For plate counts, the use of spiral bacterial plating and laser colony counting (14) is possible. DNA probes are obviously still under intensive development. Finally, other future advances will enhance methodological sensitivity. For example, further developments in digital microfluorimetric imaging, such as the availability of fast arithmetic video processors and mass storage devices (4), and improvements in low light level microscopy, such as the development of phycofluor probes (36), will enhance the FA technique. ------- 17 METHODS OF DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION Besides the methods of enumeration, a wide variety of immunological and • biochemical tests exist for the detection and identification of specific bacteria (67). However, far fewer of these tests have actually been used for bacteria in soil and even fewer are practical because of expensive instrumenta- tion. Among the most common of the remaining tests are phage typing, intrinsic antibiotic resistance, and various other serological methods. Phage typing Phage typing, the susceptibility of a specific bacterium to lysis by a bacteriophage, has wide application in the identification of bacteria (64), although soil bacteria have not been so extensively studied (83). The major advantage of phage typing is the ability to distinguish between bacterial strains which cannot be distinguished in other ways. This advantage is offset to some degree by variability in host range specificity: some phages are very specific and attack only one or a few host species whereas other phages can attack several species (84). Thus, it is important to check phage specificity before using phage typing. The major disadvantage of phage typing is that many factors influence the phage-bacterium interaction and the resistance of a bacterium may occur for even trivial reasons. For example, if a bacterium is grown at too high a temperature for flagella to form, then a phage that recognizes a flagellar antigen as a receptor site cannot attack (65). Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance Intrinsic antibiotic resistance of some soil bacteria to low levels of antibiotics can be used for bacterial identification. The method requires control strains to standardize the test and careful attention to inoculum size and time of incubation to give optimal reproducibility (52). The method has ------- 18 advantages similar to that of selective plate counts with the added advantage that changes are not conferred on the organism. The method has a disadvantage • of not working on all bacterial species, particularly slow-growing bacteria. In addition, the method only permits distinction among a limited number of strains (16). Other Serological Methods A variety of other serological methods can be used for the generic identi- fication of bacteria. These methods include gel immunodiffusion, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and radioimmune assays. These methods have advantages and disadvantages similar to that of fluorescent antibody, however they have additional disadvantages in that the number of bacteria that can be tested is limited before the tests become unwieldy. In addition, the production of so many strain-specific antibodies is a time-consuming process. The tests are routinely used to differentiate typical soil bacteria like Rhizobium (25), Azospirillum (58), and Pseudomonas (8). CONCLUSION In the case of identification, DNA probes offer the greatest sensitivity and are the method of choice, particularly for genetically-engineered bacteria where the genetic basis of differentiation is known, but the method still needs to be developed and refined for soil. In the case of detection and enumeration, a critical assessment of the superiority of one method over another is much more difficult. The ideal method would allow detection and enumeration of a specific bacterial population and would estimate -the propor- tion which is viable and metabolically active. Rarely is this achieved and some compromise must be accepted. The current trend in soil microbiology is for direct methods with greater speed, so in this regard FA and DNA probes ------- will be the future methods of choice. The direct methods of DNA probes and FA both lack the ability to detect low bacterial numbers. This is important because bacterial numbers of a single species in soil are usually lt>w. For 3 5 example, Rhizobium numbers of 10 to 10 cells per g of soil are considered "abundant" (89). Yet the alternative of plate counts with selective agents ignores the failure of this method to provide conditions under which every viable organism in the population can grow (51). The indirect method of DNA probes remains promising but is still in its developmental stage. In short, no method of detection or enumeration is perfect. It seems reasonable to continue to recommend a variety of methods depending on the experimental conditions and then to assess only relative differences between bacterial strains rather than comparing a direct and indirect method. Thus, for condi- tions involving bacterial numbers of > 10 cells per g of soil in the rhizosphere, fluorescent antibody might be more appropriate, whereas under 4 conditions of < 10 bacterial cells per g of soil, plate counts with select agents followed by DNA probes for identification are appropriate measures. ------- 20 LITERATURE CITED 1. Alexander, M. 1965. Most-probable-number method for microbial populations. p. 1467-1472. In C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 2. Alexander, M. 1985. Genetic engineering: ecological consequences. Reducing the uncertainties. Issues Sci. Technol. 1(3): 57-68. 3. Alexander, M., and Clark, F.E. 1965. Nitrifying bacteria, p. 1477-1483. In C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 4. Arndt-Jovin, D.J., M. Robert-Nicoud, S.J. Kaufman, and T.M. Jovin. 1985. Fluorescence digital imaging microscopy in cell biology. Science 230: 247-256. 5. Bakken, L.R. 1985. Separation and purification of bacteria from soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 1482-1487. 6. Balkwill, D.L., T.E. Rucinsky, and I.E. Casida, Jr. 1977. Release of microorganisms from soil with respect to transmission electron microscopy viewing and plate counts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 43: 73-87. 7. Barkay, T., D.L. Fouts, and B.H. Olson. 1985. Preparation of a DNA gene probe for detection of mercury resistance genes in Gram-negative bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 686-692. 8. Barraquio, W.L., J.K. Ladha, and I. Watanabe. 1983. Isolation and identification of Nvj-fixing Pseudomonas associated with wetland rice. Can. J. Microbiol. 29: 867-873. 9. Bennett, R.A., and E. Billing. 1975. Development and properties of streptomycin resistant cultures of Erwinia amylovora derived from English isolates. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 39: 307-315. ------- 21 10. Bohlool, B.B., and E.L. Schmidt. 1968. Nonspecific staining: its control in immunofluorescence examination of soil. Science * 162: 1012-1014. 11. Bohlool, B.B., and E.L. Schmidt. 1973. A fluorescent antibody technique for determination of growth rates of bacteria in soil. Bull". Ecol. Res. Comm. (Stockholm) 17: 336-338. 12. Bohlool, B.B., and E.L. Schmidt. 1980. The immunofluorescence approach in microbial ecology, p. 203-241. In M. Alexander (ed.) Advances in microbial ecology, Vol. 4. Plenum Press, NY. 13. Brady, N.C. 1974. The nature and properties of soils. Macmillan Publishing Co., NY. 14. Briner, W.W., J.A. Wunder, D.W. Blair, J.J. Parran, T.L. Blaney, and W.E. Jordan. 1978. Use of spiral bacterial plating and laser colony counting techniques in studies of the microbial ecology of man. p. 154-169. In A.N. Sharpe and D.S. Clark (ed.) Mechanizing microbiology. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, IL. 15. Bromfield, E.S.P., and D.G. Jones. 1979. The competitive ability and symbiotic effectiveness of doubly labelled antibiotic resistant mutants of Rhizobium trifolii. Ann. Appl. Biol. 92: 211-219. 16. Bromfield, E.S.P., M. Stein, and R.P. White. 1982. Identification of Rhizobium strains on antibiotic concentration gradients. Ann. Appl. Biol. 101: 269-277. 17. Bushby, H.V.A. 1981. Quantitative estimation of rhizobia in non-sterile soil using antibiotics and fungicides. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13: 237-239. 18. Casida, L.E., Jr. 1968. Methods for the isolation and estimation of activity of soil bacteria, p. 97-122. In T.R.G. Gray and D. Parkinson (ed.) The ecology of soil bacteria. University of Toronto Press. ------- 22 19. Cochran, W.G. 1950. Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the "most-probable-number." Biometrics 6: 105-116. • 20. Crozat, Y., J.C. Cleyet-Marel, J.J. Giraud, and M. Obaton. 1982. Survival rates of Rhizobium japonicum populations introduced into different soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14: 401-405. 21. Diem, H.G., G. Godbillon, and E.L. Schmidt. 1977. Application of the fluorescent antibody technique to the study of an isolate of Beijerinckia in soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 23: 161-165. 22. Diem, H.G., E.L. Schmidt, and Y.R. Dommergues. 1978. The use of fluorescent- antibody technique to study the behavior of a Beijerinckia isolate in the rhizosphere and spermosphere of rice. Bull. Ecol. Res. Comin. (Stockholm) 26: 312-318. 23. Dobereiner, J., and A.B. Campelo. 1971. Non-symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacteria in tropical soils, p. 457-470. In T.A. Lie and E.G. Mulder (ed.) Biological nitrogen fixation in natural and agricultural habitats. Plant Soil, Special Volume. 24. Dommergues, Y.R. 1978. The plant-microorganism system, p. 2-37. In Y.R. Dommergues and S.V. Krupa (ed.) Interaction between non-pathogenic microorganisms and plants. Elsevier Publishing Co., NY. 25. Dudman, W.F. 1971. Antigenic analysis of Rhizobium japonicum by immunodiffusion. Appl. Microbiol. 21: 973-985. 26. Echeverria, P., J. Seriwatana, 0. Chityothin, W. Chaicumpa, and C. Tirapat. 1982. Detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in water by filter hybridization with three enterotoxin gene probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16: 1086-1090. ------- 23 27. Egdell, J.W., W.A. Cuthbert, C.A. Scarlett, S.B. Thomas, and M.H. Westmacott. 1960. Some studies of the colony count technique for soil bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23: 69-86. 28. Elliott, L.F., C.M. Gilmour, J.M. Lynch, and D. Tittemore. 1984. Bacterial colonization of plant roots, p. 1-16. In R.L. Todd and J.ET Giddens (ed.) Microbial-plant interactions. Spec. Pub. 47. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 29. Ellis, W.R., G.E. Ham, and E.L. Schmidt. 1984. Persistence and recovery of Rhizobium japonicum inoculum in a field soil. Agron. J. 76: 573-576. 30. Faegri, A., V.L. Torsvik, and J. Goksoyr. 1977. Bacterial and fungal activities in soil: separation of bacteria and fungi by a rapid fractionated centrifugation technique. Soil Siol. Biochem. 9: 105-112. 31. Fitts, R., M. Diamond, C. Hamilton, and M. Feri. 1983. DNA-DNA hybridization assay for detection of Salmonella spp. in foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46: 1146-1151. 32. Fliermans, C.B., and E.L. Schmidt. 1975. Autoradiography and immuno- fluorescence combined for autecological study of single cell activity with Nitrobacter as a model system. Appl. Microbiol. 30: 676-684. 33. Fliermans, C.B., and E.L. Schmidt. 1977. Nitrobacter in Mammoth Cave. Int. J. Speleol. 9: 1-19. 34. Foster, R.C. 1985. The biology of the rhizosphere. p. 75-79. In C.A. Parker et al. (ed.) Ecology and management of soilborne plant pathogens. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN. 35. Giddens, J., and R.L. Todd. 1984. Rhizosphere microorganisms - overview. p. 51-68. In R.L. Todd and J.E. Giddens (ed.) Microbial-plant interactions. Spec. Pub. 47. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. 36. Glazer, A.N., and L. Stryer. 1984. Phycofluor probes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 9: 423-427. ------- 24 37. Goldman, M. 1968. Fluorescent antibody methods. Academic Press, NY. 38. Grunstein, M., and D.S. Hogness. 1975. Colony hybridization: a method • for the isolation of cloned DNAs that contain a specific gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72: 3961-3965. 39. Habte, M. 1985. Selective medium for recovering specific p&pulations of rhizobia introduced into tropical soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50: 1553-1555. 40. Habte, M., and M. Alexander. 1975. Protozoa as agents responsible for the decline of Xanthomonas campestris in soil. Appl. Microbiol. 29: 159-164. 41. Herr, L.J., C.R. Weaver, and R.K. Horst. 1961. A soil dilution procedure applicable to rhizosphere microorganism assays. Can. J. Microbiol. 7: 277-280. 42. Hill, W.E., and C.L. Carlisle. 1981. Loss of plasmids during enrichment for Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41: 1046-1048. 43. Hill, W.E., J.M. Madden, B.A. McCardell. D.B. Shah, J.A. Jagow, W.L. Payne, and B.K. Boutin. 1983. Foodborne enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: detection and enumeration by DNA colony hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45: 1324-1330. 44. Hill, W.E., W.L. Payne, and C.C.G. Aulisio. 1983. Detection and enumera- tion of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica in food by DNA colony hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:636-641. 45. Hobbie, J.E., R.J. Daley, and S. Jasper. 1977. Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33: 1225-1228. 46. Hornby, D. 1969. Gravimetrical and mycological investigations of soil suspensions in the soil dilution plate technique. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 32: 244-258. ------- 25 47. James, N., and M. Sutherland. 1939. The accuracy of the plating method for estimating the numbers of bacteria and fungi from one dilution and • one aliquot of a laboratory sample of soil. Can. J. Res. 17 (C): 97-108. 48. Jenny, H., and K. Grossenbacher. 1963. Root-soil boundary zones as seen in the electron microscope. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27: 273-277. 49. Jensen, V. 1962. Studies on the microflora of Danish beech forest soils. I. The dilution plate count technique for the enumeration of bacteria and fungi in soil. Zentralbl. Bakteriol., Parasitenkd., Infektionskrankh. Hyg., Abt. 2, Naturwiss.: Allg. Landwirtsch. Tech. Mikrobiol. 116: 13-32. 50. Jensen, V. 1968. The plate count technique, p. 158-170. In T.R.G. Gray and D. Parkinson (ed.) The ecology of soil bacteria. University of Toronto Press, Canada. 51. Jones, J.G. 1979. A guide to methods for estimating microbial numbers and biomass in fresh water. Sci. Publ. No. 39. Freshwater Biological Association, England. 52. Josey, D.P., J.L. Beynon, A.W.B. Johnston, and J.E. Beringer. 1979. Strain identification in Rhizobium using intrinsic antibiotic resistance. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 46: 343-350. 53. Kaper, J.B., S.L. Moseley, and S. Falkow. 1981. Molecular characteriza- tion of environmental and nontoxigenic strains of Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun. 32: 661-667. 54. Kawamura, A., Jr. 1977. Fluorescent antibody techniques and their applications. University Park Press, Baltimore. 55. Kingsley, M.T., and B.B. Bohlool. 1981. Release of Rhizobium spp. from tropical soils and recovery for immunofluorescence enumeration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42: 241-248. ------- 26 56. Kjelleberg, S., and M. Hennansson. 1984. Starvation-induced effects on bacterial surface characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48: 497-503. 57. Kuritza, A.P., and A.A. Salyers. 1985. Use of a species-specific DNA hybridization probe for enumerating Bacteroides vulgatus in human feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50: 958-964. 58. Ladha, J.K., W.L. Barraquio, and I. Watanabe. 1982. Immunological techniques to identify Azospirillum associated with wetland rice. Can. J. Microbiol. 28: 478-485. 59. Liang, L.N., J.L. Sinclair, L.M. Mallory, and M. Alexander. 1982. Fate of model ecosystems of microbial species of potential use in genetic % engineering. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44: 708-714. 60. Louw, H.A., and D.M. Webley. 1959. The bacteriology of the root region of the oat plant grown under controlled pot culture conditions. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 22: 216-226. 61. Maas, R. 1983. An improved colony hybridization method with significantly increased sensitivity for detection of single genes. Plasmid 10: 296-298. 62. Mallory, L.M., J.L. Sinclair, L.N. Liang, and M. Alexander. 1982. A simple and sensitive method for assessing survival in environmental samples of species used in recombinant DNA research. Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull. 5: 5-6. 63. Meiklejohn, J. 1957. Numbers of bacteria and actinomycetes in a Kenya soil. Soil Sci. 8: 240-247. 64. Meynell, E. 1964. The significance of bacteriophage in bacterial classification. A review. J. Gen. Microbiol. 36: 461-469. 65. Meynell, E.W. 1961. A phage,^>Y, which attacks motile bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 25: 253-290. ------- 27 66. Mishuck, E., and M. Roberts. 1975. Automation of fluorescent antibody techniques. Part 1. p. 449-490. In C-G Heden and T. Illeni (ed.) Automation in microbiology and immunology. John Wiley & Sons, NY. 67. Mitruka, B.M. 1976. Methods of detection and identification of bacteria. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH. *" 68. Moseley, S.L., and S. Falkow. 1980. Nucleotide sequence homology between the heat-labile enterotoxin gene of Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Bacteriol. 144: 444-446. 69. Newman, E.I., and H.J. Bowen. 1974. Patterns of distribution of bacteria on root surfaces. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6: 205-209. 70. Niepold, F., R. Conrad, and H.G. Schlegel. 1979. Evaluation of the efficiency of extraction for the quantitative estimation of hydrogen bacteria in soil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 45: 485-497. 71. Park, R.W.A. 1978. The isolation and use of streptomycin-resistant mutants for following development of bacteria in mixed cultures, p. 107-112. In D.W. Lovelock and R. Davies (ed.) Techniques for the study of mixed populations. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Tech. Ser. No. 11. Academic Press, NY. 72. Rennie, R.J. 1978. Accuracy of immunofluorescence enumeration of Nitrobacter in soil. Rev. Ecol. Biol. Sol 15: 279-288. 73. Rennie, R.J., V.G. Reyes, and E.L. Schmidt. 1977. Immunofluorescence detection of the effects of wheat and soybean roots on Nitrobacter in soil. Soil Sci. 124: 10-15. 74. Reyes, V.G., and E.L. Schmidt. 1979. Population densities of Rhizobium japonicum strain 123 estimated directly in soil and rhizospheres. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37: 854-858. ------- 28 75. Rovira, A.D., E.I. Newman, H.J. Bowen, and R. Campbell. 1974. Quantitative assessment of the rhizoplane microflora by direct microscopy. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6: 211-216. 76. Rowe, R., R. Todd, and J. Waide. 1977. Microtechnique for most-probable- number analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33: 675-680. 77. Russell, P.E. 1975. Variation in the virulence of some streptomycin resistant mutants of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 39: 175-180. 78. Sayler, G.S., M.S. Shields, E.T. Tedford, A. Breen, S.W. Hooper, K.M. Sirotkin, and J.W. Davis. 1985. Application of DNA-DNA colony hybridi- zation to the detection of catabolic genotypes in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 1295-1303. 79. Schank, S.C., R.L. Smith, G.C. Weiser, D.A. Zuberer, J.H. Bouton, K.H. Quesenberry, M.E. Tyler, J.R. Milam, and R.C. Littell. 1979. Fluorescent antibody technique to identify Azospirillum brasilense associated with roots of grasses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 11: 287-295. 80. Schmidt, E.L. 1973. Fluorescent antibody techniques for the study of microbial ecology. Bull. Ecol. Res. Comm. (Stockholm) 17: 67-76. 81. Schmidt, E.L. 1974. Quantitative autecological study of microorganisms in soils by immunofluorescence. Soil Sci. 118: 141-149. 82. Schwinghammer, E.A. 1967. Effectiveness of Rhizobium as modified by mutation for resistance to antibiotics. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 33: 121-136. 83. Staniewski, R. 1970. Typing of Rhizobium by phages. Can. J. Microbiol. 16: 1003-1009. 84. Stocker, B.A.D. 1955. Bacteriophage and bacterial classification. J. Gen. Microbiol. 12: 375-381. ------- 29 85. Stotzky, G. 1985. Mechanisms of adhesion to clays, with reference to soil systems, p. 195-253. In D.C. Savage and M. Fletcher (ed.) Bacterial * Adhesion. Plenum Press, NY. 86. Taylor, J. 1962. The estimations of numbers of bacteria by tenfold dilutions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 25: 54-61. 87. Torsvik, V.L., and J. Goksjrfyr. 1978. Determination of bacterial DNA in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10: 7-12. 88. Vidor, C., and R.H. Miller. 1980. Relative saprophytic competence of Rhizobium japonicum strains in soils as determined by the quantitative fluorescent antibody technique (FA). Soil Biol. Biochem. 12: 483-487. 89. Vincent, J.M. 1970. A manual for the practical study of root-nodule bacteria. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 90. Williams, S.T., and T.R.G. Gray. 1973. General principles and problems of soil sampling, p. 111-121. In R.G. Board and D.W. Lovelock (ed.) Sampling - Microbiological monitoring of environments. Academic Press, NY. 91. Wollum, A.G., II, and R.H. Miller. 1980. Density centrifugation method for recovering Rhizobium spp. from soil for fluorescent-antibody studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39: 466-469. 92. Xu, H.-S., N. Roberts, F.L. Singleton, R.W. Attwell, D.J. Grimes, and R.R. Colwell. 1982. Survival and viability of nonculturable Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microb. Ecol. 8: 313-323. 93. Zimmerman, R., R. Iturriaga, and J. Becker-Birck. 1978. Simultaneous determination of the total number of aquatic bacteria and the number thereof involved in respiration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36: 926-935. ------- CONJUGAL DNA TRANSFER AMONG BACTERIA: TECHNIQUES, ISSUES, AND FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THE RELEASE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED BACTERIA ITEM #6941A PREPARED BY: RAMON J. SEIDLER TEAM LEADER TERRESTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAM U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY CORVALLIS, OREGON 97333 ------- TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Purpose of this report 3 General Introduction 4 Characteristics of plasmids in bacteria 6 Enhanced frequency of mating 11 Plasmid transfer in habitat simulating environments 13 Author's conclusions of issues presented and concerns raised 27 Literature cited 30 ------- PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this special report is to familiarize the reader with some techniques, issues, and findings in the scientific literature regarding the formation and detection of genetic recombinants produced from the conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA from one bacterium into another. Discussions are oriented towards risk assessment issues regarding the release of genetically-engineered microorganisms (GEMs). Examples are presented regarding possible consequences resulting from the "escape" of engineered DNA from a GEM which enters the indigenous microbial population in a natural environment. Data from representative publications dealing with quantitative aspects of plasmid DNA transfer and molecular/ecological parameters influencing such transfers will also be discussed. No attempt has been made to provide a broad based literature review since this has recently been done (19). The literature reviewed and the data discussed were chosen to illustrate the kinds of information available on DNA transfers conducted under laboratory and habitat simulating conditions. Conjugal transmission of plasmid DNA is the most relevant to discuss since a data base of information exists on plasmid transfers and the biotechnology industry depends heavily on the use of plasmids both as cloning vehicles and as vectors to shuttle DNA between species. Page 3 ------- GENERAL INTRODUCTION Many uses of genetically engineered microorganisms involve their deliberate release to the environment to perform functions which include but are not limited to: pollution abatement, pest control, crop protection from frost, modification of soil fertility, extraction/concentration of metals from ore, and enhanced recovery of oil (11,22). There have been a variety of concerns raised over the possible biohazards and effects from the released GEMs. Research needed for assessing possible environmental effects of GEMs has been summarized (13). Genome characterization and genetic stability were seen as high priorities for short term research needs over the next several years (13). Genetic stability refers to the potential of genetic material, especially the engineered DNA, to move from a GEM into indigenous microbes, or the movement of DNA from indigenous microbes into the GEM. The potential hazards of intergeneric movement of DNA would be heightened if engineered DNA in a GEM is transferred into organisms which are already established in nature. This could result in the unintentional exposures of indigenous species as well as ecosystem processes to novel products of genetic engineering. Following the transfer of DNA into indigenous species, potential risks could also arise from changes in gene expression or changes in specificity of action of gene products. Page 4 ------- An additional concern with regards to genetic stablity is the known ability of at least certain plasmids to increase the "fertility" of recipient strains for accepting plasmid DNA in subsequent matings. The ability of certain bacteria to participate in a mating has been shown to increase up to 1 million times through prior acquisition of a specific plasmid (21). These and other issues make it important to be familiar with research findings on genetic stability issues. Page 5 ------- CHARACTERISTICS OF PLASMIDS IN BACTERIA Genetic exchange and recombination events in prokaryotes can occur through three mechanisms. These are transformation, transduction, and conjugation. It is a consensus that transfer of DNA from cell to cell by intimate contact (conjugation) is the most common mechanism of DNA transfer between bacterial species. (6). The most common mechanism for conjugal DNA transfer involves the participation of conjugative plasmid DNA. A plasmid is a closed circular DNA molecule which is stably inherited without being genetically linked to the bacterial chromosome. Plasmid molecules are of the order of 1-200 Megadaltons in molecular weight, encode for several to over 200 genes, and amount to some 0.04% to 10% or more of a typical bacterial chromosome (6). Genes carried on plasmids can code for a variety of functions ranging from the expression of resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals, virulence factors in pathogens,and metabolic activities including dinitrogen fixation and aromatic compound biodegradation (6). Because of these novel genetic features and their rather modest size, plasmids are very useful molecules in the commercial exploitation of genetic engineering. A single bacterium may contain several different plasmids which co-exist and are compatible. Incompatible plasmids cannot coexist in the same cell. The molecular basis of incompatilility is not known. However, plasmids which bind to the same cell Page 6 ------- membrane site might be incompatible because the site is either essential for the start of replication or because attachment to the site may be essential to accomplish segregation of plasmids at the time of cell division (6). Plasmids are designated as belonging to one of some 30 incompatible groups which are designated by a capital letter (eg. Inc C plasmids). Plasmids are conjugative or nonconjugative. Conjugative plasmids are self-transmissable to other bacteria. Many conjugative plasmids can also transfer pieces of chromosomal DNA although this typically occurs at a much lower frequency than plasmid transfer (6). Conjugative plasmids have a cluster of genes which allow them to self-transfer by conjugation. The vast majority of known conjugative plasmids are found in gram-negative bacteria. To date, there are no known instances of conjugal DNA transfer between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Where information is available, the ability of a plasmid to transfer itself is known to be encoded by a large set of at least 20 genes. This region is known as the transfer or Tra locus of the plasmid molecule (6). Insertion sequences and transposons are genetic elements occurring on plasmids and chromosomal DNA. Insertion sequences and transposons are able to make copies of themselves and insert into plasmid DNA or chromosomal DNA. Insertion sequences are small transposable elements of the order of 1,000 nucleotide base pairs (6). Transposons are larger elements and code for many Page 7 ------- of the traits specified by plasmids such as antibiotic resistance. Transposons contain an insertion sequence at each end of the molecule and a series of genes between. Because of the insertion sequence at each end, transposons can move readily between chromosomes and plasmids carrying their genes with them. The insertion sequence has an identical nucleotide sequence that is repeated at each end of the DNA molecule. Transposons, like insertion sequences, also have identical base sequences that are repeated at each end of the DNA molecule. These terminal nucleotide sequences establish the bases for enzymatic insertion into other DNA molecules. There appears to be substantial transfer of genes between the same and different bacterial genera and species in naturally occurring populations (18). Thus the issue of genetic stability of GEMs is NOT one as to whether gene transfer occurs in nature; virtually all experts would agree that transfer does indeed occur. In one situation for example, the plasmid RP1 has been identified unchanged in 17 different bacterial genera (18). It is the opinion of Slater (18) that the natural evolution of interacting bacterial communities may be much more significant (interacting through genetic transfer of DNA) in the evolution of new metabolic capabilities of bacteria, than a series of (mutational) events occurring in one organism. Thus, the transmission of DNA among microbial populations via DNA plasmids is a major contributing factor in bacterial evolution. Significant questions regarding risk assessment arise Page 8 ------- therefore over the frequencies by which plasmids can transfer in natural microbial communites and whether engineered DNA fragments will be moved into unintended species. This issue has been poorly investigated (18). It is impossible at present to predict on the basis of known properties of a given plasmid-host combination and on the basis of known properties of a given ecosystem, whether a plasmid will persist, or spread to other species in that habitat (4). Aggregation of bacteria on a surface stimulates plasmid transfer (4). Bacterial aggregates in nature occur widely on the surfaces of inanimate objects such as stones, twigs, soil particles, as well as on biological substrates such as roots and leaves (12). Bacteria in nature occur in highest densities on such surfaces. Microscopy of plant root surfaces, for example, 11 reveals over 1 X 10 bacteria residing in a cubic centimeter within the rhizoplane of 0-1 micrometer from plant root surfaces (12). The microbial populations within this rhizoplane include some of the most common candidates for genetic engineering such as Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, Achromobacter, and Xanthomonas. It is well known by many geneticists that use of membrane filters (which promote cell aggregates) promotes more efficient conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA when compared to broth cell suspensions (12). Indeed, the relative amounts of cells which participate in conjugal DNA transfer can, depending on the incompatability group, be rather strongly dependent upon a solid substrate (Table 1). Page 9 ------- Table 1. Dependency of certain conjugal matings on contact with a physical substrate (adapted from 12). Plasmid Broth/Solid Ratio Relative Amount of Incompatability Surface Mating DNA Transfer Group (solid:broth) * I,K,FII,H,J,V No preference .3-5 C,D,T,X Surface preferred 50-100 M,N,P,U,W Surface highly over 2,000 preferred * Ratio transfer frequency on solid surface/frequency in broth Thus it can be seen that the more commonly studied plasmids of Inc Groups W and P are more frequently transferred into suitable recipient cells by an order of 2,000-fold, when matings are carried out on physical substrates such as membrane filters or agar, compared to broth matings. It is important therefore, when investigating the genetic stability (conjugal transmissability) of plasmid DNA, to investigate the experimental transfer capablities under a variety of mating conditions. Page 10 ------- ENHANCED FREQUENCY OF MATING It is known that plasmids may undergo a variety of physical changes within recipient cells. Indeed, certain plasmids are rather unstable in certain species and are lost upon cultivation in the absence of selective pressure to maintain traits carried by plasmids. Pseudomonas species, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is known to be a poor recipient for many plasmids transferred from Enterobacteriaceae (21). A novel case was reported following the transfer of an Inc N plasmid into P. aeruginosa from E. coli. The transconjugant strain, designated as GT24 was found to have an enhanced recipient ability for plasmids in subsequent mating trials (21). Strain GT24 was isolated following the transfer of Inc N plasmid R45 into strain GT1 of P. aeruginosa. GT24 was found to allow increased entry of plasmids. This increased "fertility" as a recipient even extended to plasmids of other Inc Groups as well. Many of the plasmid transfers into GT24 had never previously been demonstrated in P. aeruginosa. Table 2 summarizes some of these observations. Page 11 ------- Table 2. Transfer frequencies of various plasmids from E. coli to a P. aeruginosa recipient (adapted from 21). Plasmid Plasmid Frequencies of transfer to P. aeruginosa in E. coli Inc Group GT1 GT24 donor R40a R100-1 pIP69 R45 RP1 -7 C 9 X 10 -8 FII <10 -8 M 1 X 10 -7 N 1 X 10 -1 P 9 X 10 6 X 2 X 4 X 3 X 2 X -1 10 -4 10 -8 10 -2 10 -1 10 * Transconjugants produced per recipient cell. Plasmids of Inc Groups C and N were transferred into strain 5 6 GT24 about 10 to 10 times more frequently then into parental strain GT1. Further studies revealed that strain GT24 is a special transconjugant in which at least a portion of the plasmid R45 has become integrated into the chromosome (21). The antibiotic resistance markers associated with R45 are stable and do not transfer during conjugation. Also, no plasmid DNA can be isolated from strain GT24. Concerns over this type of enhanced fertility in accepting plasmids and how or whether enhanced fertility might occur in environmental situations, may become important issues in future risk assessment discussions on genetic stability. Page 12 ------- PLASMID TRANSFER IN HABITAT-SIMULATING ENVIRONMENTS There are a limited number of studies which address the transfer of plasmids among bacteria contained under environmentally "simulated" conditions. Simulated environmental conditions refer to those studies which make an effort to maintain and monitor laboratory grown bacteria in chambers placed into water or sewage, or to release tagged strains into soil or onto plants. Mach and Grimes (1982) studied the conjugal transfer of plasmid DNA encoding resistance to antibiotics between enteric bacteria confined to diffusion chambers. The chambers contained sterile domestic wastewater along with a suitable donor and recipient. The chambers were incubated in primary or secondary settling tanks at a wastewater treatment plant. Soluble nutrients from the wastewater were able to diffuse across the membrane surrounding the immersed chambers. Rates of DNA conjugal transfer from donor to recipient were then compared to those observed in laboratory cultures grown in either nutrient broth or in sterile unchlorinated primary wastewater influent contained in test tubes. Species of bacteria studied included Proteus mirabilis, E. coli, and a human pathogen, Shigella sonnei. None of these bacteria are candidates for release to the environment by the biotechnology industry. However, methods of study and general observations may be applicable to plasmid transfers occurring in eutrophic fresh water environments polluted with domestic wastewaters. Table 3 summarizes a portion Page 13 ------- of the results presented in that study. Results revealed overall plasmid transfer rates under -3 laboratory conditions of about 2 X 10 transconjugants per donor for both nutrient broth and sterile unchlorinated primary wastewater. Rates in the chambers immersed into primary and -5 secondary wastewater averaged 2-logs less, 2-7 X 10 transconjugants per donor. Transfer was evaluated at 20C in laboratory incubation while in situ temperatures at the wastewater plant are below the known optimum for plasmid transfer in species of enteric bacteria. The lower temperatures probably account for the 100-fold reduction in transfer rates compared to the laboratory observations. In these studies there were no viable indigenous cells within the chambers to compete for nutrients or to serve as other fortuitous participants in the mating process. Furthermore, the species diversity in the wastewater is significantly different from the pure culture studies used in the chamber mating experiments. Plasmid transfers are much more likely between species of E. coli than in intergeneric transfers involving the diversity of species present in natural wastewater. Therefore one must view the absolute numerical results of this study with caution when attempting to extrapolate to the natural environment. The transconjugation rates reported are most likely higher then those occurring in wastewater. Page 14 ------- Table 3. Frequencies of antibiotic resistance transfer between donor and recipient enteric bacteria (adapted from 10). _4 * Donor X Recipient R-plasmid transfer (X 10 ) nutrient sterile sterile 1 sterile 2 broth sewage wastewater wastewater E. E. P. P. P. coli HI X S.sonnei S coli 2 X S. sonnei S mirabilis H X E. mirabilis S X E. mirabilis H X S. coli coli H3 H3 sonnei S 10 60 23 20 7 19 45 27 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 5 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 .2 .5 .4 .0 .0 * Transconjugants per donor An interesting feature involving the dynamic nature of bacterial numbers and the volume of wastewater treated daily, deserves mention in attempting an overview of these transfer frequencies. Mach and Grimes reported an average rate of -5 5 X 10 transconjugants per donor formed during a 3-hr mating 5 period. If one conservatively assumes there are 5 X 10 E. coli donor cells in a wastewater containing a total population of 1 X 8 10 cells/ml (0.5% are E. coli donor cells), then there should be 1 transconjugant produced during a 3-hr period. The wastewater 6 plant in this study processes 6.4 X 10 liters of sewage per day and is a relatively small operation. The total daily number of transconjugants produced at this treatment plant would be: 9 1 transconjugant/ml/3-hrs X 24 hrs X 6.4 X 10 ml of raw 9 sewage processed per day or about 50 X 10 transconjugants produced per day. Page 15 ------- Naturally the waste treatment plant reduces significantly the number of bacteria which leave the plant in the final effluent. Even if the final effluent is chlorinated, it will not be sterile. If one assumes there is a 7-log (10-million fold) reduction in total bacterial numbers following wastewater treatment, there may still be some 5,000 recombinant bacteria which leave this wastewater plant daily as a result of the single hypothetical example of conjugation that has been monitored in the study. Such bacteria would be multiply antibiotic resistant since the transmission of plasmids specifying resistance to several antibiotics are being transferred. These transconjugants may in turn function as new donor strains in the receiving stream environment. There will be untold additional types of mating pair combinations among other bacterial species depending upon the incidence of conjugative plasmids in the bacterial wastewater population. A very similar study on conjugation using diffusion chambers immersed in wastewater was carried out by Altherr and -5 Kasweck (1982). Rates of plasmid transfer in wastewater were 10 -6 to 10 transconjugants per donor compared with rates which were 10 to 100-fold higher under laboratory incubation conditions. The similar 10 to 100-fold difference in transfer rates for laboratory vs wastewater conditions is similar to the range of differences recorded in the Mach and Grimes study. Page 16 ------- Another, quite recent study revealed that so-called "safe" or nonconjugative plasmids can be mobilized and transferred into bacteria indigenous to the wastewater environment by a mechanism called cointegrate formation (5). This process requires an initial transfer of a conjugative plasmid such as the RlOO-1 into a second cell which contains a nonconjugative plasmid, such as pBR325. A conintegrate may form between the two plasmids making pBR325 take on the ability to transfer into a third cell. In the report of Gealt et al (1985) plasmid RlOO-1 was transferred from E. coli strain 1784 into E. coli strain KA1661 which contains pBR325. Thus coincubation of KA1661 and 1784 in L broth resulted in high molecular weight DNA acquisition in KA1661. The high molecular weight plasmid was the cointegrate formed between plasmid RlOO-1 and pBR325. Transfer of pBR325 during a triparental mating was subsequently confirmed by isolation of transconjugants from a mating between KA1661 X 1784 X E. coli 1997. The following list of strains are examples of the participants in a triparental mating involving the formation of a cointegrate DNA plasmid molecule. A. E. coli 1784(R100-1) mobilizer strain B.I E. coli KAl66l(pBR325) pBR nonconjugative B.2 E. coli 2656(pBR322) pBR nonconjugative C. E. coli 1997(recipient cell) contains no plasmids Biparental matings require organism types A and B or A and C. Triparental matings require types A, B, and C. Biparental 4 8 matings conducted in L broth generated 10 to 10 Page 17 ------- transconjugants/ml after 25 hrs of incubation (5). The L broth matings are obviously not habitat simulating experiments but were conducted for purposes of comparison with triparental recombinants found in other experiments. Results of certain triparental matings from incubations in rich L broth medium produced results as summarized in Table 4. Table 4. Transconjugants produced from triparental matings involving laboratory strains of E. coli incubated in L broth (adapted from 5). E. coli strains Initial cell No. transconjugants used in triparental density of each per ml matings E. coli strain 9 5 1784(R100-1) 2 X 10 3 X 10 8 from the triparental 2656(pBR322) 2 X 10 mating 9 1997 2 X 10 8 8 1784(R100-1) 1 X 10 4 X 10 7 from the triparental KA166l(pBR325) 8 X 10 mating 7 1997 5 X 10 Several replications of these crosses were conducted with 7 9 variations in cell densities of the participants from 10 to 10 cells/ml. There was no strong correlation between the number of transconjugants produced and the cell densities of the triparental participants over the concentration range investigated. Nevertheless, in those crosses involving E. coli, Page 18 ------- pBR nonconjugative plasmids were mobilized in triparental matings at rates which did not significantly differ from the transfer rates recorded for the conjugative plasmid RlOO-1 in biparental matings. Through the use of triparental matings, it was also possible to follow the mobilization of pBR325 into two species of enteric bacteria recently isolated from wastewater (Table 5). The rates of transconjugants produced were less than those involving laboratory recipient strains such as 1997 by a factor of some 100 to one-hundred thousand-fold (5). Matings of cells were also conducted in wastewater for detecting possible triparental matings. These matings were conducted in 300 to 600 microliter volumes of autoclaved wastewater placed on top of a Millipore filter/saturated filter pad and incubated at 37C. Transconjugants were formed on the pads 2 5 as a result of triparental matings at the rates of 10 to 10 per ml. One should be cautioned however, that the filter surface, the temperature, the potential carryover of nutrients from the rich broth medium, and the autoclaved wastewater all combine to make this a highly artifical replication of the "natural" environment. Page 19 ------- Table 5. Transconjugants produced from triparental matings involving wastewater isolates incubated in L broth (adapted from 5). E. coli strains Initial cell No. transconjugants/ml in triparental density of each mating E. coli strain 1784(R100-1) KAl66l(pBR325) E. cloacae 191* 1784(R100-1) KAl66l(pBR325) E. coli 343 7 10 7 10 7 10 8 10 7 8 10 -10 7 8 10 -10 1 3 5 X 10 to 1 X 10 from the triparental mating 2 3 10 to 10 from the triparental mating * Strains which were isolated from wastewater The general mechanism for the transfer of nonconjugative plasmids such as pBR325 and pBR322 involves their cointegration into a helper plasmid, such as the R100-1 used in the studies of Gealt, et al. Thus the size (molecular weight) of the original plasmids are likely to change in the transconjugants produced in a triparental mating. In some cases only a portion of the original pBR325 plasmid became integrated into R100-1. Apparently, the sizes of the nonconjugative plasmid will vary considerably. No one knows whether triparental matings occur in nature at rates that are detectable or at rates which may raise a risk assessment "issue". However, Levine et al (9) have shown that triparental matings involving recombinant strains of E. coli in Page 20 ------- the human intestine are extremely rare. In those studies, recombinants produced from triparental matings involving the mobilization of pBR325 were only detected when the "ecosystem" was disturbed following the oral administration of antibiotics that selectively favored transconjugants. Those results are distinctly different from the report of Gealt et al (5). However, the latter studies were carried out under aerobic incubation and in the absence of competing natural flora. On the other hand, it has been indicated that some 50% of the natural coliform population contains conjugative ("helper") plasmids (6). Therefore there may appear to be ample opportunities in certain natural environments for cointegrate plasmid formation to occur. As mentioned earlier in this report, some plant-associated bacterial species occur in high cell densities and such species are of interest to the biotechnology industry. Published studies have shown that recombinants may form from the conjugal transmission of plasmid DNA among bacteria associated with plant crops and other plant matter (7,8, 20). In one study, rates of transconjugants produced from broth matings in the laboratory were compared with rates which were produced during growth of Klebsiella strains on the roots of radish plants and in moistened sawdust (20). Radish seeds were 3 4 soaked in broth containing 10 to 10 bacteria/ml, resulting in some 10 to 100 recipient cells adsorbed to the surface of each seed. Seeds were planted in nonsterile sandy-loam soil containing indigenous bacteria. Prospective donor bacteria were Page 21 ------- 2 3 pipetted over the seeds to provide about 10 to 10 viable donors in the vicinity of each seed. Radish plants were removed weekly and the rhizosphere analyzed for transconjugants of the Klebsiella recipient originally applied to the seeds. Table 6 summarizes the results of that study. Table 6. Transfer of antibiotic resistance in broth and on the radish rhizosphere present in natural soil (adapted from 20). -5 Donor X Recipient R-plasmid transfer (X 10 ) Penassay radish broth rhizosphere* Klebsiella SL5 X Klebsiella UG13 1.3 0.02 " X Klebsiella MH29 5.2 0.2 11 X Klebsiella U010994 500 0.02 11 X Klebsiella PC2 0.3 0.02 UG28 X Klebsiella DS1 530 0.02 * Calculated as transconjugants/donor/gram radish. The number of transconjugants produced per donor illustrates that 10% to much less than 0.1% recombinants were formed in the soil on the radish rhizosphere as compared to those formed in the rich broth medium. Both donor and recipient bacteria used had been recently isolated from their natural habitats. Nothing was known about their genetic compatability or lack thereof. Unlike previous studies, the production of these transconjugants took place under field simulated conditions in the presence of indigenous microflora and may have come close to mimicking the Page 22 ------- interactions of GEMs with indigenous microbial flora. The actual number of recombinant bacteria formed per gram of radish plant is not an impressive number. One would anticipate there to be less than 100 such bacteria per plant rhizosphere. However, in a single row of plants 100 feet in length there would 5 8 be approximately 10 recombinants or some 10 per acre. The studies conducted by Lacy's research group have been concerned with the possible transmission of plasmid DNA among bacteria which cause plant diseases (7,8). The transmission of antibiotic resistance among bacteria which cause plant diseases which are controlled by antibiotic therapy has great economic implications. In the 1975 study, Lacy and Leary demonstrated that plasmid RP1 was transferred in lima bean pods injected with O.lml suspensions of donor and recipient cells. Transmission of the plasmid, both in the pods and in leaves inoculated by congestion with water containing bacteria, occurred between Pseudomonas glycinea and Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Table 7). Page 23 ------- Table 7. Transmission of plasmid RPl in vitro(in laboratory media) and in planta (adapted from 7). -2 Donor X Recipient R-plasmid transfer (X 10 )* in vitro in planta P. glycinea X P. phaseolicola 5.8,1.1, 55 (pods) 2.7,.49,2.2 8.2 (leaves) * counts expressed as transconjugants/recipient It was conservatively concluded that plasmid transmission as studied, occurred at least as well in planta as with broth- cultured laboratory procedures. The authors concluded that this transfer, along with an ability of E. coli to also transfer the plasmid into Pseudomonas species in the bean pods, suggests that plasmid transfer in planta is not just limited to related species of plant pathogenic bacteria. In a more recent study ( 8 ) Lacy et al, followed the transfer of plasmid RPl among species of Erwinia and Pseudomonas syringae pathovar syringae in planta in pear blossoms. The investigators mentioned that streptomycin chemotherapy had previously been effective in the treatment of fire blight in pears caused by Erwinia amylovora. However, there is an increasing emergence of streptomycin resistant strains of E. amylovora. Oxytetracycline has been suggested as an alternative treatment. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to ascertain whether plasmid-borne resistance to oxytetracycline Page 24 ------- may also occur due to plasmid transmission in planta. In interpreting the outcome of the research, it seems relevant to detail how the in planta matings were conducted. Cultures were pregrown on agar, washed in sterile distilled water, and resuspended. Approximately 0.03 ml recipient was added onto the surface of the receptacle of a detached pear blossom. Then 0.005 ml of the donor was added to the droplet containing the recipient cells. The detached blossoms were maintained (with pedicels immersed in water) in moist chambers at 25C for 4 to 7 hrs. Bacteria were washed from the blossoms, concentrated by centrifugation, and plated onto appropriate media selective for donor or recipient alone, or for the transconjugants. Putative transconjugants were verified first on media selective for phenotypic expression of the recipient and then by plasmid extraction and purification. Table 8 summarizes these mating experiments. Page 25 ------- Table 8. Frequencies of antibiotic resistance transfer between Erwinia herbicola or P. syringae donors and E. amylovora recipients, both in vitro and in planta (adapted from 8). Donor X Recipient R-plasmid transfer frequency* in vitro in planta -3 -7 -2 -6 P. syringae X E. amylovora 10 to 10 10 to 10 -5 -6 -1 -8 E. herbicola X E. amylovora 10 to 10 10 to 10 * Transconjugants per donor It is apparent that the in planta transfer of pRPl to E. amylovora was often greater than the in vitro transfer rate. The authors indicated however, that there was a great range in the transfer rates. No explanation was offered for the higher transfer rate in the in planta studies. The great range in the rates was attributed to differences in the ratio of donor to recipient. These data serve to underscore the earlier articles reviewed where plasmid transfer in habitat simulating environments was shown to occur, often at rates which approach or occasionally exceed those found in laboratory media. Page 26 ------- AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS OF ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONCERNS RAISED 1. Discussions over the risk assessment issues regarding genetic stability of GEMs should not be directed at WHETHER DNA exchange occurs among bacteria in the environment. 2. The major issue regarding the intergeneric movement of DNA deals with the transfer of genetically-engineered DNA from a GEM into organisms already established in nature. Concerns arise from unintentional exposures of indigenous species and ecosystem processes to novel products of genetic engineering. Changes in expression of engineered genes in new genetic backgrounds may result in an increase or shut off of transcriptional and expression activities. 3. Escape of the engineered DNA from the original GEM into the indigenous population may prolong the persistence of the new genetic element and make many conventional detection/enumeration techniques ineffective (selective media, fluorescent antibodies). 4. Transmission of DNA among microbial populations via DNA plasmids is thought to be a major factor in bacterial evolution. It follows therefore, that the escape of engineered DNA into the natural population, may influence the evolution of indigenous bacteria. 5. Transfer of DNA involving cell contact (conjugation) may be strongly influenced, depending on the plasmid Inc group, by contact with a substrate. Substrate contact is common in symbiotic associations in terrestrial ecosystems (plant roots, intestinal tract insects, animals, etc). 6. Published studies reveal that DNA transfer has been demonstrated in a variety of artificial habitats intended to mimic the "natural" environment. Transfer rates are dependent upon plasmid Inc groups, temperature, cell densities of the interacting species, and other physical/chemical conditions of the mating environs. Estimates of trillions of transconjugants form daily within wastewater, plant root and leaf surfaces. 7. Standard assay systems are needed to methodically evaluate, on a case-by-case basis, the genetic stability of various plasmid groups in an array of bacterial species and habitats which mimic actual or anticipated GEM release situations. Page 27 ------- LITERATURE CITED 1. Altherr, M. R., and K. L. Kasweck. 1982. In situ studies with membrane diffusion chambers of antibiotic resistance transfer in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:838- 843. 2. Chatterjee, A. K., and M. P. Starr. 1972. Genetic transfer of episomic elements among Erwinia species and other enterobacteria: F'lac+. J. Bacteriol. 111:169-176. 3. Coplin, D.L. 1978. Properties of F and P group plasmids in Erwinia stewartii. Phytopathol. 68:1637-1643. 4. Freter, R. 1984. Factors affecting conjugal plasmid transfer in natural bacterial communities, In Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, M. J. Klug and C. A. Reddy (ed.), American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C., pp 105-114. 5. Gealt, M. A., M. D. Chai, K. B. Alpert, and J. C. Boyer. 1985. Transfer of plasmids pBR322 and pBR325 in wastewater from laboratory strains of Escherichia coli to bacteria indigenous to the waste disposal system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:836- 841. 6. Hardy, K. 1981. Bacterial plasmids. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. 104pp. 7. Lacy, G. H., and J. V. Leary. 1975. Transfer of antibiotic resistance plasmid RP1 into Pseudomonas glycinea and Pseudomonas phaseolicola in vitro and in planta. J. Gen. Microbiol. 88:49- 57. 8. Lacy, G. H., V. K. Stromberg, and N. P. Cannon. 1984. Erwinia amylovora mutants and in planta-derived transconjugants resistant to oxytetracycline. Can J. Plant Pathology 6:33-39. 9. Levine, M. M., J. B. Kaper, H. Lockman, R. E. Black, M. L. Clements, and S. Falkow. 1983. Recombinant DNA risk assessment studies in man: efficacy of poorly mobilizable plasmids in biologic containment. Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull. 6:89-97. 10. Mach, P. A., and D. J. Grimes. 1982. R-plasmid transfer in a wastewater treatment plant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:1395-1403. 11. Milewski, E. A. 1985. Field testing of microorganisms modified by recombinant techniques: applications, issues, and development of "points to consider" document. Recomb. DNA Tech. Page 28 ------- Bull. 8:102-108. 12. Genetic interactions among microbial communities. pp.379- 421. In: Microbes in their natural environments. J. H. Slater, R. Whittenbury, and J. W. T. Wimpenny, eds. Society for Genral Microbiology Symposium. 13. Rissler, J. F. 1984. Research needs for biotic environmental effects of genetically-engineered microorganisms. Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull. 7:20-30. 14. Shaw, D. R., and V. J. Cabelli. 1980. R-plasmid transfer frequencies from environmental isolates of Escherichia coli to laboratory and fecal strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40:756- 764. 15. Singleton, P., and A. E. coli below 22C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42:789-791. 16. Singleton, P. 1983. Colloidal clay inhibits conjugal transfer of R-plasmid Rldrd-19 in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:756-757. 17. Singleton, P., and A. E. Anson. 1983. Effect of pH on conjugal transfer at low temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:291-292. 18. Slater, J. H. 1984. Genetic interactions in microbial communities, In, Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, M. J. Klug and C. A. Reddy (ed). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C., pp 87-93. 19. Stotzky, G. and H. Babich. 1984. Fate of genetically- engineered microbes in natural environments. Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull. 7:163-188. 20. Talbot, H. W., D. Y. Yamamoto, M. W. Smith and R. J. Seidler. 1980. Antibiotic resistance and its transfer among clinical and nonclinical Klebsiella strains in botanical environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:97-104. 21. Tardif, G. and R. B. Grant. 1982. Transfer of IncN Plasmids to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chem. 22:142-144 22. Vidaver, A.K. 1985. Plant-associated agricultural applications of genetically engineered microorganisms: projections and constraints. Recomb. DNA Tech. Bull. 8:97-102 Page 29 ------- |