fc dl
A
^UL^
CINCINNATI 1962-1963
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Heollh Service
-------
Public Health Service Publication No. 999-AP-2I
-------
— ^
A
^L^
CINCINNATI 1962-1963
U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Public Health Service
-------
Continuous Air Monitoring Program
in Cincinnati
COMPILED BY
AIR QUALITY AND EMISSION DATA
PROGRAM
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Public Health Service
National Center for Air Pollution Control
Cincinnati, Ohio 45237
January 1965
-------
The ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERIES of reports was established to re-
port the results of scientific and engineering studies of man's environment: The com-
munity, whether urban, suburban, or rural, where he lives, works, and plays; the air,
water, and earth he uses and re-uses; and the wastes he produces and must dispose of
in a way that preserves these natural resources. This SERIES of reports provides for
professional users a central source of information on the intramural research activities
of the Centers in the Bureau of Disease Prevention and Environmental Control, and
on their cooperative activities with state and local agencies, research institutions, and
industrial organizations. The general subject area of each report is indicated by the
letters that appear in the publication number; the indicators are
AP.-—Air Pollution
RH — Radiological Health
UIH — Urban and Industrial Health
Reports in the SERIES will be distributed to requesters, as supplies permit. Re-
quests should be directed to the Center identified on the title page.
-------
PREFACE
The Continuous Air Monitoring Program (CAMP) represents
the first large-scale effort to obtain comparable, continuous,
concurrent data on gaseous pollutant levels in the atmospheres
of major American cities. A fundamental premise in the establish-
ment of the program was the need for such data to augment
research on the nature of air pollution and its impact on man
and his environment. The Public Health Service wishes to en-
courage all interested research personnel to participate in the
'exploitation of the many avenues of investigation opened by
this information.
The CAMP master data files are maintained on magnetic
tapes for analysis by electronic computer, and duplicate tapes
can be made available for use by anyone having access to com-
puter facilities. Since data from the National Air Sampling
Network, as well as large quantities of mortality, morbidity,
meteorological, and socioeconomic data, are also available on
magnetic tapes from various sources, the possibilities for com-
puter analysis are almost limitless. Correspondence concerning
the availability or use of CAMP data should be directed to the
Chief, Air Quality Section, Laboratory of Engineering and
Physical Sciences, Division of Air Pollution, Robert A. Taft
Sanitary Engineering Center, 4676 Columbia Parkway,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226.
This publication presents the results of CAMP operation in
Cincinnati, Ohio, during 1962 and 1963. Part 1 presents back-
ground information about the Cincinnati area to assist the
reader in interpreting the data in the light of factors peculiar to
Cincinnati. Part 2 contains a brief summary of the data and
presents the analyses currently available, with interpretation and
discussion. Part 3 summarizes the data as hourly, daily, and
monthly mean concentrations to permit the use of this volume
as a reference.
Similar publications summarizing operations in other cities
(Chicago, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Philadelphia, San
Francisco, and Washington) will be available during 1965, and
volumes are planned for subsequent data. In addition, specialized
reports describing specific analyses in detail will be prepared
periodically. Studies of sample averaging times, of pollutant
exposure, and of the ratios of peak to average concentrations
are currently in process. '
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT vi
ABSTRACT vi
THE CONTINUOUS AIR MONITORING PROGRAM. 1
Introduction 1
Objectives 2
PART 1 - CINCINNATI, OHIO 3
Topography and Land Use 5
Sources of Air Pollution 8
Meteorological Potential for Air Pollution 8
Air Pollution Control Activities 9
Camp Station Site 12
PART 2 - RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 17
Summary of Results . . 19
Pollutant Interrelationships 21
Behavior of Individual Pollutants 25
Incidents of High Pollution . 40
PART 3 - DATA TABLES 43
Tables 3-2 — 3-25 Hourly Averages of
Sulfur Dioxide 47
Tables 3-26 — 3-49 Hourly Averages of
Nitric Oxide 71
Tables 3-50 — 3-73 Hourly Averages of
Nitrogen Dioxide 95
Tables 3-74 — 3-97 Hourly Averages of
Total Oxidant 119
Tables 3-98 —3-116 Hourly Averages of
Total Hydrocarbon 143
Tables 3-117 —3-126 Hourly Averages of
Carbon Monoxide ..• 162
Tables 3-127 — 3-134 Two-hour Averaged
Soiling Index 172
Tables 3-135 — 3-137 Daily Average
Suspended Particulates .... 180
APPENDIX A — INSTRUMENTATION
AND METHODS 185
Instrumentation 185
Data Retrieval System 187
Methods of Data Analysis 189
APPENDIX B — REFERENCES 189
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Public Health Service acknowledges with appreciation
the many contributions of cooperating local agencies to the
operation of the Continuous Air Monitoring Program. In the
publication of this volume with data from Cincinnati, Ohio,
particular appreciation is expressed to the Cincinnati Bureau of
Air Pollution Control and Heating Inspection, supervised by
Charles W. Gruber, for the operation of the station and the
provision of the station site.
ABSTRACT
This report presents results of the operation of the Public
Health Service Continuous Air Monitoring Program (CAMP)
in Cincinnati, Ohio, during 1962 and 1963. Data on atmos-
pheric levels of sulfur dioxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide,
total oxidants, total hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide are
analyzed and discussed. The data are tabulated as hourly,
daily, and monthly mean concentrations. Background infor-
mation about Cincinnati and descriptions of the instrumentation
are included.
VI
-------
CONTINUOUS AIR MONITORING PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
It has been estimated that as many as 6000
urban areas in the United States are affected to
some degree by air pollution, but air quality
measurements have been made in no more than a
tenth of these communities.l Generally, the measure-
ments are limited to particulate pollutants. Data
from dustfall collectors and high-volume filter
samplers are most frequently available; measure-
ments of soiling in COH or RUDS units are less
commonly made.*
In recent years there have been significant in-
creases in the technical ability and legal authority
needed to combat particulates in the air, and some
urban areas have made gratifying progress in
reducing such pollution. During this period,
however, public awareness and official concern has
been expanded to encompass the less obvious, but
more complex, problems of gaseous pollution. Com-
munities that have never been particularly concerned
with particulate pollution are showing increased
evidence of photochemical smog in periodic episodes
of decreased visibility, eye irritation, and plant
damage.
Available data on gases in the air are even more
limited in distribution and in quantity than the
sparse particulate data. The National Air Sampling
Network of the Public Health Service has measured
sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in about 50
cities by means of 24-hour integrated samples taken
biweekly. The cost of more frequent gas sampling
has limited its routine use to the larger urban areas.
The Public Health Service has intensively measured
gaseous pollutants in smaller urban areas during
cooperative air pollution surveys, 2'3>4 but these
sampling programs have been conducted only for
relatively short periods of time. The rare instances
of daily, 24-hour sampling programs have usually
been restricted to the collection of integrated samples
of at least 2 hours duration, despite the knowledge
that the concentrations of gaseous pollutants can
change significantly within a few minutes.
The understanding of gaseous pollutants is handi-
capped not only by the scarcity of data, but also
by differences among several methods and
techniques of sampling for any single pollutant.
This has limited comparison among and joint inter-
pretation of the results of numerous studies. Con-
current data for more than one pollutant are almost
completely lacking; this handicaps studies of the
more complex effects and interrelationships.
The need for continuous, concurrent data for
several gases, obtained by comparable methods in
various communities, was recognized some years
ago. It was apparent that the requisite sampling
program would be far more difficult than any effort
previously attempted. Completely satisfactory instru-
mentation was lacking. The subject itself--the rapid
and concurrent variation of atmospheric pollutant
levels - - was little understood. The question of which
pollutants could or should be measured was largely
unanswered. Furthermore, few groups interested in
air pollution could marshal the financial or man-
power resources for such an .undertaking.
In 1960, Congress provided impetus and
financial support for a program capable of resolving
some of the ambiguities of gaseous pollutants and
their sampling. Public Law 86-493:t directed the
Public Health Service to accelerate research into the
effects of air pollutants from motor vehicles on
human health. Since such pollutants are largely
gases, the Continuous Air Monitoring Program was
established to measure the concentrations of various
gases in the ambient atmosphere. The development
of the necessary instrumentation was accomplished
by the Public Health Service through a contract
with a commercial instrumentation firm, and the
operation of the program was assigned to the Air
Quality Section of the Laboratory of Engineering
and Physical Sciences, in the Division of Air
Pollution. The first station was opened in Cincinnati
in October 1961, and by early 1962 five additional
stations were operating. At the present time these
six stations are located in Chicago, Cincinnati,
Philadelphia, San Francisco, St. Louis, and
Washington, and monitor six common gaseous
pollutants. They are operated in cooperation with
the local air pollution control agencies. The equip-
ment now located in St. Louis was operated in New
Orleans during 1962 and 1963 and was moved to
St. Louis in February 1964. Measurements com-
parable to those made in the CAMP operations are
also obtained in Detroit, New York, and Los Angeles
at stations provided and operated by local groups.
Insofar as practicable, station locations are com-
parable; stations are located in or near the principal
business district in each city, and away from
significant point sources. Since a CAMP station
constitutes only one sampling site in a given com-
munity, the measured levels are specific only for
the immediate vicinity of the station, although the
data do have application to studies of the broad
patterns of temporal variations and pollutant inter-
relationships affecting the entire urban area. Avail-
able information indicates that data from the present
stations are representative of at least the central
business districts of the respective cities.
'COH (Coefficient of Haze) units are based on the transmission of light through a soiled filter; RUDS (Reflectance Units
of Dirt Shade), on the reflection of light.
t Public Law 86-493, 86th Congress, H.R.8238, approved June 8, 1960.
INTRODUCTION
-------
OBJECTIVES
CAMP has two related objectives: (a) to increase
knowledge about the nature of air pollution by pro-
viding information that was heretofore unavailable,
i.e., comparable, continuous, concurrent data on
significant gaseous pollutants from a number of
urban areas; and (b) to stimulate air pollution
investigations and control of pollution, where
required, by providing such information. In fulfill-
ment of these objectives, CAMP data have been
made available through abbreviated interim sum-
maries since the inception of the program. Sufficient
information has now been accumulated to warrant
the presentation and initial interpretations given in
this series of reports. It is anticipated that the
increased availability of this information, through
these publications and in subsequent more detailed
publications, will encourage its application to many
problem areas.
Information provided by CAMP makes possible
the intra-community study of the concurrent
variation of several gaseous pollutants and their
effects. Analysis of CAMP data has already demon-
strated the occurrence of significant photochemical
reactions in communities other than in California,
and further investigation of this phenomenon is
anticipated. The data are presently being utilized in
conjunction with meteorological data in math-
ematical diffusion models, studies of the effects of
large single sources of pollution on ambient concen-
trations, and the differentiation of temporal and
geographic pollutant patterns.
The delineation of the impact of air pollution on
man and his environment is dependent on knowledge
of the diurnal and seasonal variability of pollutant
levels. In the field, CAMP data are now being used
in corrosion studies and epidemiological studies of
health effects. In the laboratory, the data have
application to the selection of realistic pollutant
concentrations and combinations for the exposure
of animals and plants. The effects and behavior of
pollutants can be examined in terms of various
time-concentration arrays. CAMP data also provide
necessary information for the evaluation of proposed
air quality criteria and the impact of applying
such criteria through air conservation programs.
The improvement and development of techniques
for assaying air quality are also of considerable
importance. Relationships of peak to average con-
centrations over various periods of time are expected
to provide guidance for the optimum usage of
continuous and integrating types of instrumentation.
Similarly, studies of pollutant interrelationships
may indicate that one pollutant, or a combination
of a few, can provide a good index to the behavior
of others. Either of these factors can affect the type
and cost of air quality measurements.
OBJECTIVES
-------
PART 1:
CINCINNATI,OHIO
-------
PART 1: CINCINNATI, OHIO
This discussion of the Cincinnati area is included
to facilitate an understanding of the interpretations
of the data in Part 2 in the light of factors peculiar
to Cincinnati, and to assist in evaluating their
applicability to other locations.
TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND USE
Cincinnati is situated in southwestern Ohio, on
the Ohio River. Metropolitan Cincinnati includes
the urbanized areas of northern Kentucky and is
about 16 miles east of the Ohio-Indiana border.
The entire area is part of an upland plain about
900 feet above sea level, with the flood plain of the
Ohio some 400 feet lower (Figure 1-1). Downtown
Cincinnati is located in the basin formed by the
junction of the Mill Creek and Licking River valleys
with the flood plain of the Ohio.
The basin area and the flood plains are sur-
rounded by steep bluffs rising 200 to 400feet to the
general level of the plateau. These bluffs are cut
frequently by the valleys of small tributary streams,
which produce an attractive setting of dramatic pro-
montories and steep hills but render much of the
land too rugged for normal urban uses.
As a result of its rugged terrain, Cincinnati is
less densely built than most cities its size, and the
various land uses tend to be well isolated (Figure
1-2). The central business district in the basin area
is the only dense concentration of commercial
activity; the only dense (more than 20 persons per
acre) residential concentration fills the remainder of
the basin and a part of the plateau between the Ohio
River and the Norwood trough, which has relatively
gentle slopes. This area is the oldest portion of the
city, and the structures are generally old and more
densely built than elsewhere. Other residential areas,
newer and less dense, occupy the hilltops surround-
ing the basin. Table 1-1 presents population and
housing statistics for the Cincinnati area, with data
from several other midwestern cities and the nation.
Metropolitan Cincinnati is primarily an in-
dustrial area, with about a third of the employment
in manufacturing industries and less than 1 percent
in agriculture. The distribution of manufacturing
activities by type of product is indicated in Table
1-2; the principal industries are aerospace, soap
products, automotive, chemical, and machine tool
manufacture. Industry is concentrated almost ex-
clusively in the Mill Creek valley and the Norwood
trough, since flooding limits the use of the Ohio and
Little Miami flood plains. Although this topography
provides excellent separation of industrial land use
from most of the residential areas, the steep bluffs
in general tend to hinder the dispersal of air
pollutant emissions.
TABLE 1-1
COMPARATIVE POPULATION AND HOUSING STATISTICS
United States
Midwest States8
State of Ohio
CINCINNATI
3MSAb
Urbanized Area
City
CITY OF
Buffalo
Pittsburgh
Indianapolis
Cleveland
Chicago
Area,
sq mi
730.0
242.5
77.3
39.4
54.1
71.2
81.2
224.2
POPULATION
1960
Population
1,071,600
993,600
502,500
532,800
604,300
476,300
876,100
3,550,400
U.S.
Rank
21
17
21
20
16
26
8
2
Density
PerSq
Mile
1468
4101
6501
13520
11171
6689
10789
15836
HOUSING
Density,
units per
sq mi
470
1330
2220
4500
3630
2230
3490
5420
Mdn
No
of
Rms
4.9
5.1
5.2
4.5
5.4
4.0
5.4
4.6
4.7
4.9
4.4
Sin-
gle
Unit
%
76.3
58.9
79.1
56.8
54.0
37.4
28.3
56.1
72.5
43.5
24.1
«10
Yrs
Old
%
27.5
24.3
25.3
22.5
21.0
11.2
5.3
8.7
15.1
7.2
10.2
Sound
%
74.0
77.1
77.6
78.5
79.2
72.3
78.9
70.1
76.4
79.3
78.5
INCOME
Mdn.
$
5660
6215
6171
6318
6317
5701
5713
5605
6106
5935
6738
<
$3000
%•
21.4
15.9
15.7
14.9
15.1
19.6
17.3
18.4
15.6
17.2
13.6
>
$10,000
%
15.1
17.2
16.2
18.2
18.4
15.8
13.1
14.3
16.2
13.0
21.3
aOhio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin
Figures represent the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) consisting of Hamilton County, Ohio,
and Campbell and Kenton Counties, Kentucky; in October 1963, the Bureau of the Census added four
additional counties to the Cincinnati SMSA, making it the 16th largest in the nation with a population of
about 1.3 million.
Source: Bureau of the Census, Reference 5
TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND USE
-------
ELEVATION ABOVE SEA LEVEL: < 600 I I 600-800 EZ22 > 800 I I
Figure 1-1. Topography of Metropolitan Cincinnati.
TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND USE
-------
PRIMARILY INDUSTRIAL (QnjnD DENSE RESIDENTIAL (> 20 PERSONS PER ACRE) ££§-3 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL BUSS CAMP STATION
Fifure 1-2. Land Use Areas in Metropolitan Cincinnati.
TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND USE
-------
TABLE 1-2
DISTRIBUTION OF MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES
Cincinnati Metropolitan Area
Type of Product
Ordinance and accessories
• Food and kindred products
Tobacco manufactures
Textile mi!! products
Apparel, other fabric products
Wood products (except furniture)
Furniture and fixtures
Paper and allied products
Printing, publishing industries
Chemicals and allied products
Petroleum and coal products
Rubber and plastic products
Leather and leather products
Stone, clay, and glass products
IVimary metal industries
Misc. fabricated metal products
Machinery (except electrical)
Electrical machinery and supplies
Transportation equipment
Instruments and similar products
Miscellaneous
Number
of Firms,
percent
0.3
10.9
0.2
0.8
4.9
3.G
3.8
3.5
8.6
6.3
0.8
2.8
1.4
4.0
3.4
12.8
15.4
2.7
2.2
2.7
8.9
Number of
Approx. Firms Em-
Employ- ploying
ment over 250
No Data
18,000
No Data
No Data
7,800
800
4,700
6,400
11,900
11,600
1,900
300
1,800
1,600
No Data
13,400
27,700
8,400
26,400
1,300
10,990
1
17
1
0
14
0
4
7
10
9
1
4
0
4
4
12
20
10
6
2
«
Represents 112 firms; i. e.. duplication has been included.
Source: Percent of Firms arid Approximate Employment - Hamilton
County Regional Planning Commission, Reference 6.
Number of Firms Employing Over 250 - Cincinnati Chamber
of Commerce, Reference 7.
SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION
Cincinnati is characterized by nearly complete
absence of the so-called "dirty" industries; the
area's only oil refinery is located 13 miles west of
Cincinnati, and there are no basic steel activities.
Process losses from industrial activities nearer the
central city are considered to cause, at most, limited-
area nuisances; the primary air pollutant emissions
from the concentrated industrial districts in the Mill
Creek valley and Norwood trough are fuel com-
bustion products, largely those associated with the
use of coal.
The distribution of fuels used for space heating
follows a typical pattern. Coal and natural gas are
used in the downtown commercial and older residen-
tial areas, primarily the basin area, and in the
industrial valleys. Use of fuel oil is heaviest in the
suburban areas. Natural gas is used throughout
the area, the light commercial and newer residential
districts heating with gas almost exclusively.
Of the total energy annually consumed for all
purposes except transportation, coal combustion
produces 60 percent, natural gas 35 percent, and
fuel oil 5 percent. Annual coal consumption amounts
to 5 million tons, with peak usage about 20,000
tons daily, and annual fuel oil consumption is
about 50 million gallons. The coal and fuel oil for
space heating contain less than 1 percent sulfur.
Consumption of natural gas varies from 63 to 525
million cubic feet daily, totaling about 70 billion
cubic feet annually.
Public electric power is generated at three stations
with a total capacity of over 1.4 million kilowatts.
Only the downtown station, however, is located so
that its emissions contribute significantly to air
pollution in the central city. This power plant
operates as a regulating unit, and annually burns
about 360,000 tons of coal with sulfur content
averaging 4.3 percent. Particulate control equipment
is considered as 95 percent efficient, and gaseous
emissions are estimated to average about 80 tons
of sulfur dioxide and 4 tons of nitrogen oxides daily.
The only industry of size and nature such as to
be considered a significant single point combustion
source is a steel mill in Campbell County, Kentucky.
This rolling mill is the largest single user of natural
gas in the area, burning 5 million cubic feet daily.
Four large refuse incinerators operate in the area,
burning a total of about 1100 tons of mixed refuse
daily; control equipment is estimated to reduce
particulate emissions by 90 percent, and gaseous
pollutant emissions from the incinerators are con-
sidered negligible.
Transportation sources consist primarily of
motor vehicles, although railroad and river trans-
port activities no doubt contribute slightly to the
pollutant load in the Mill Creek Valley and river-
front areas. In 1962, there were 356,000 motor
vehicles registered in Hamilton County; about
310,000 of these were passenger cars. This repre-
sents a density of 770 cars per square mile or one
car per 2.6 persons in the county, and over 1500
cars per square mile in the urbanized area (U. S.
average is one car per 2.9 persons ). Vehicular
fuel consumption annually totals about 200 million
gallons of gasoline and 20 million gallons of diesel
fuel, and varies 10 to 20 percent with the seasons.
METEOROLOGICAL POTENTIAL FOR
AIR POLLUTION
Air quality is dependent not only on the quantity
of pollutants discharged to the community air, but
also on the amount of pollutant dilution in the
atmosphere. Pollutants in the air may be dispersed
horizontally by lateral mixing and downwind trans-
port or by mixing in a vertical direction.
A seasonal summary of typical wind speeds in
the Cincinnati area is presented in Table 1-3. The
TABLE 1-3
HORIZONTAL DISPERSION CHARACTERISTICS
\Vi liter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Average Wind Speed,
mites per hour
1 1.0
11.4
i.5
8.H
Horizontal
Dilution
Capacity15
Good
Good
Moderate
Moderate
Frequency of
Poor Horizontal
Dilution Capacity-, c%
27 7
2I1..-)
f>4.2
4:ui
a Data from Greater Cincinnati Airport
b()n u scale of poor, moderate, good, excellent
c Wind speeds 7 mph or less
SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION
-------
average wind speeds provide moderate horizontal
dispersion during the warmer months and good
dispersion the rest of the year.
The dilution of pollutants by vertical mixing
depends primarily upon the vertical temperature
difference through the lowest layer of the atmosphere.
During daytime hours the lower air is typically
warmer than the air aloft; in such a situation, the
low-lying warm air tends to rise and the resulting
air movements mix the pollutants throughout the
entire depth of the lowest layer of air. The depth
of this layer thus becomes a measure of the atmos-
phere's vertical dilution capacity during the day.
The first two columns of Table 1-4 summarize
this "mixing depth" by seasons for Cincinnati. The
vertical dilution capacity ranges from poor in
winter to excellent in summer, following the seasonal
sunshine and temperature cycle.
TABLE 1-4
VERTICAL MIXING CHARACTERISTICS
Average
Mixing Depth,8
feet above
surface
Vertical
Dilution
Capacity b
Frequency of Poor Vertical
Mixing Conditions,c percent
7AM 10AM 7PM 10PM
Winter 1700
Spring 4100
Summer 5250
Autumn 3280
Poor
Good
Excellent
Moderate
41 21
57 6
66 4
65 15
17 40
2 41
4 57
31 69
aMaximum daily value, usually occuring in mid-afternoon; observa-
tions made at Dayton, Ohio, but considered applicable to Cincinnati
D0n a scale of poor, moderate, good, excellent
c A very stable layer based within 500 feet of the surface
During the nocturnal hours the cooling of the
earth's surface lowers the temperature difference
across the lowest air layer from its daytime value
and lessens vertical mixing and dilution of pollu-
tants proportionally. Under severe conditions the
temperature difference can become inverted, i.e., the
lower air cooler than that above; such an inversion
essentially prohibits vertical dilution of pollutants.
The last four columns of Table 1-4 summarize
the occurence in Cincinnati of very poor vertical
mixing conditions, including periods of atmospheric
inversion. Such conditions occur overnight most
frequently during summer and autumn, but also
significantly during the cooler months. A more ob-
vious seasonal difference is that adverse nocturnal
conditions occur earlier and tend to persist later
during autumn and winter than during spring and
summer.
Both summer and autumn are characterized by
only a moderate degree of horizontal dilution and a
high frequency of adverse conditions of nocturnal
vertical mixing. In summer, however, the poor
nocturnal mixing conditions do not form early in
the evening nor persist into the morning, and vertical
mixing is excellent in the afternoons. The autumn
months, with a high frequency of persistent in-
versions and low wind speeds combined with only
moderate afternoon mixing, are thus the period of
overall poorest pollutant dilution in the atmosphere.
The autumn months are also the occasion for
frequent severe inversions, which persist through-
out the day or over several days. These lengthy
inversions are caused by the stagnation of a warm
anticyclonic weather system and are usually more
severe than the more normal nocturnal inversions.
Because wind speeds in such systems are generally
very low, both horizontal and vertical dilution of
pollutants are severely suppressed and pollutants
can accumulate significantly. A program for fore-
casting such lengthy inversions delineated seven
such situations affecting the Cincinnati area for 18
days during 1962 and 1963. Figure 1-3 indicates
the pattern of severe inversion periods in the eastern
United States. Such occurrences concentrate along
an arc roughly paralleling the Appalachian moun-
tains, with Cincinnati lying along the western edge.
The direction in which pollutants are dispersed
is dependent upon wind direction; Figure 1-4 indi-
cates the general wind pattern in the Cincinnati area.
In all seasons, southwesterly winds predominate;
westerly winds also are frequent during winter and
spring. In general, this pattern would indicate the
spread of pollution from the Mill Creek Valley in-
dustries into the res!dential areas of the northeast
plateau.
Meteorological influences on air quality include,
of course, not only the overall patterns of the extent
and direction of pollutant dilution, but also innumer-
able specific smaller effects. One such effect that
occurs frequently is the morning process of fumi-
gation. Both decreased vertical mixing and gener-
ally lower wind speeds permit pollutants to accumu-
late overnight, usually in a layer a few hundred feet
above the surface. As sunrise brings about a change
in the temperature differential, the resulting vertical
mixing brings the accumulated pollutants to the
surface briefly before they are subsequently further
dispersed vertically. This effect is seen as a sudden
rise in pollutant concentrations, to what is often the
highest level of the day, shortly after sunrise.
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACTIVITIES
Responsibility for air pollution control in the
City of Cincinnati is vested in the Bureau of Air
Pollution Control and Heating Inspection, under the
direction of Charles W. Gruber. Air pollution control
legislation has been hi effect since 1903, and the
last major change was enacted in 1947. Thepresent
ordinance regulates smoke emissions, combustion
ash, and coal volatility for hand-fired equipment;
it specifies design and control standards for all
fuel-burning equipment, and requires permits for
installation and annual inspection of major
installations.
METEOROLOGICAL POTENTIAL FOR AIR POLLUTION
-------
Figure 1-3. Number of Days of High Air Pollution Potential,
August 1960 - September 1963 (As forecast by
U.S. Weather Bureau Research Station, Cincinnati).
10
METEOROLOGICAL POTENTIAL FOR AIR POLLUTION
GPO 821-093-2
-------
WINTER
SPRING
Figure 1-4. Seasonal Wind Rosas at Greater Cincinnati Airport.
METEOROLOGICAL POTENTIAL FOR AIR POLLUTION
11
-------
A 1957 ordinance regulates automobile exhaust
emissions, and a required safety inspection annually
rejects about one-fourth of 1 percent of cars inspected
for having excessively smoky exhausts. An
ordinance in effect since January 1963 sets design
standards for the many small residential and com-
mercial refuse incinerators, regulates emissions of
fly ash from such installations with a locally deve-
loped simple particulate-count criteria, and sets a
limit on permissible emissions of odors more defini-
tive than the "nuisance" level previously used. Other
air pollution problems are dealt with as public
nuisances.
Several suburban municipalities (Figure 1-5),
primarily the industrial cities in or near the northern
Mill Creek Valley, have associated as the Inter-
community Air Pollution Control Program, which
purchases services for pollution control and com-
plaint investigation from the City of Cincinnati;
this pioneer effort in voluntary area cooperation
has met considerable success, with an estimated 50
percent drop in air pollution problems over the 7
years of the Program.
The Cincinnati Bureau of Air Pollution Control
routinely collects data on dustfall and soiling index.
Dustfall is measured at various locations through-
out the city; in 1962 the average was 15.3 tons per
square mile per month, about half the pre-control
ordinace levels. Figure 1-5 includes 1962 dustfall
data for various areas of the city as a rough indi-
cation of geographic variation in air quality. Soiling
index values are recorded at three locations; 1963
levels were about 1.5 RUDS/1000 linear feet down-
town, 0.8 on a nearby hilltop, and 0.6 at a more
distant suburban site (see Figure 1-5). Figure 1-6
shows the trend of soiling index levels over the last
9 years.
The Cincinnati Bureau participates in the
National Air Sampling Network by collecting bi-
weekly particulate samples with a high-volume filter
sampler on the roof of the downtown Public Library,
about 80 feet above street level (Figure 1-5). Tables
1-5 and 1-6 present frequency distributions of the
weight of total particulates and organic particulates
over the last few years, with the average of similar-
sized cities and the national average for comparison.
CAMP STATION SITE
The CAMP station in Cincinnati is located at the
corner of Central Avenue and Ann Street, on a
municipally operated parking lot. The site is in a
largely open area near the western edge of the
central business district, about 1800 feet north of
the southern portion of the Mill Creek Expressway*
and a mile north of the Ohio River. The nearest
part of the Mill Creek Valley industrial area, about
1'4 miles to the west, is occupied by a railroad
terminal, a sewage treatment plant, and the site of
an urban renewal project. Some information has
been gathered relating to the effect of nearby pollu-
tant sources, but no definitive statement can yet be
made.
At the CAMP station wind speeds were lower and
prevailing wind directions different from those re-
corded at the Airport, presumably because of the
topographic effect of the valley floor location.
Hourly average data from the station are compiled
in Figure 1-7 (compare with Figure 1-4). Wind
speeds were consistently low, rarely exceeding 12
mph, and were highest in spring and lowest during
summer and fall. Winds were most frequently from
the west and northwest, rather than from the south-
west as at the airport, and easterly winds were very
rare. These patterns indicate at least some channel-
ing of winds down the Mill Creek Valley.
"This portion of the expressway was not opened to traffic until December 1963.
12
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACTIVITIES
-------
SCALE OF MILES
0 1/212 3
Wyorning£Uockland,Reading/p
CINCINNATI
Y) 14.9
CB
1ZZZI IAPCP- MEMBER COMMUNITIES
12.3 Dustfall (T/sq mi/mo)
AA Land Use Classification:
A-Residential, low density
B-Residential, high density
C-Commercial, neighborhood
D- Commercial, downtown
E-Industrial, low air pollution potential
F- Industrial, high air pollution potential
Sampling Sites
©-CAMP Station
©-NASN
Soiling Index
©-Downtown
©-Hilltop
©-Suburban
Source: City of Cincinnati
Figure 1-5. 1962 Dustfall Distribution and
Location of Control Activities.
Figure 1-6. Soiling Index Levels, 1955 - 1963
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACTIVITIES
13
-------
TABLE 1-5
SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
National Air Sampling Network Station
Cincinnati
1957-1961
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1957-1961
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Average of
19 cities
Population
400,000-
700,000
National
Average,
190 Cities
No. of
Sam-
ples
25
22
26
24
25
122
30
28
33
31
2133
14494
Concentration, micrograms per cubic
meter
Frequency Distribution, percent
Min
72
89
42
63
58
42
100
58
72
42
15
6
10
83
94
83
64
70
80
109
78
93
64
58
48
20
90
103
93
107
81
94
116
85
107
76
30
107
115
104
117
26
107
123
90
113
87
85
74
40
117
123
111
130
107
117
132
99
119
99
50
132
130
123
136
117
127
146
107
127
117
112
101
60
141
137
151
142
124
138
159
133
134
135
70
157
144
166
151
139
149
172
142
141
158
145
137
80
168
180
189
180
15)
171
187
148
149
180
90
197
214
206
214
173
200
207
180
180
214
216
212
Max
237
319
336
316
189
336
336
218
237
319
977
1706
Arith
Mean
133
145
143
145
116
136
155
122
132
135
129
118
Geo
Mean
127
137
131
136
110
128
148
115
128
120
113
104
Std
Geo
Dev
1.36
1.39
1.54
1.45
1.39
1.44
1.32
1.40
1.29
1.63
1.68
1.89
TABLE 1-6
BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC MATTER
National Air Sampling Network Station
Cincinnati, 1957-1961
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1957-61
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Averages of
19 Cities
Population
400,000-
700,000
National
Average,
190 Cities
No. of
Sam-
ples
25
22
26
24
25
122
30
28
33
31
2109
14461
Concentration, micrograms per cubic
Frequency
Min
2.1
5.3
2.2
5.2
4.1
2.1
3.5
2.2
2.1
2.2
0.8
0.0
10
2.7
6.9
5.3
5.3
5.0
4.9
6.0
4.8
3.2
4.9
4.0
3.0
20
3.8
7.8
6.0
6.7
5.6
6.2
7.9
5.2
6.0
6.3
30
5.8
8.8
6.9
7.0
6.5
6.9
8.6
6.4
6.6
6.8
6.2
5.2
meter
Distribution, percent
40
6.6
9.6
7.4
7.4
7.0
7.5
9.6
6.9
7.0
7.2
50
7.4
10.3
8.8
8.0
7.7
8.3
10.8
7.3
7.5
8.5
8.3
7.4
60
8.1
12.2
9.9
8.5
8.2
9.2
12.2
9.1
8.0
10.3
70
9.6
15.3
12.2
9.8
9.6
10.6
15.1
10.0
8.4
15.3
11.7
10.6
80
12.2
18.5
17.0
11.3
12.2
14.4
17.0
10.9
8.8
18.5
90
17.0
23.6
23.6
17.0
14.4
18.0
20.0
14.4
10.3
22.4
20.1
19.3
Max
18.8
50.0
47.9
22.4
15.4
50.0
47.9
15.4
17.9
50.0
109.6
123.9
Arith
Mean
8.2
14.0
12.2
9.4
8.5
10.4
13.2
8.4
7.7
12.5
10.8
9.9
Geo
Mean
6.9
12.1
9.7
8.7
7.9
8.8
11.4
7.7
7.1
9.9
8.7
7.6
Std
Geo
Dev
1.87
1.67
1.95
1.45
1.45
1.74
1.69
1.55
1.54
1.94
1.91
2.08
14
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ACTIVITIES
-------
WINTER 1962-1963
SPRING 1963
IX )—FREQUENCY OF
CALM WINDS
Figure 1-7. Seasonal Wind Rosas at CAMP Station, Dacambar 1962 - November 1963.
CAMP STATION SITE
15
-------
PART 2:
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
-------
PART 2: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
During 1962 and 1963 the CAMP station in
Cincinnati recorded over 829,000 valid measure-
ments* of gaseous air pollutant concentrations;
Table 2-1 summarizes the pollution levels and lists
the periods for which data are available. Con-
centrations of the various pollutants ranged from
maximum values 4 to 30 times the mean levels
to minima below the sensitivity of the instruments.
Although overall mean levels were generally low,
significantly high pollutant levels did occur during
the 2-year period. There were several incidents
of photochemical smog and at least two periods
of severe atmospheric stagnation with attendant
high concentrations of pollutants.
Pollutant levels in Cincinnati are compared with
those recorded at other CAMP stations in Figure
2-1. Total hydrocarbon concentrations observed
in Cincinnati were generally the highest among
the cities, while levels of sulfur dioxide, carbon
monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen were intermediate.
Total oxidant levels in Cincinnati were exceeded
only by those in New Orleans; this is due at least
in part to relatively low sulfur dioxide levels in
both cities and the attendant lack of interference
by sulfur dioxide in the measurement of total
oxidants. t
TABLE 2-1
AIR POLLUTANT LEVELS a
Cincinnati CAMP Station, 1962-1963
Maximum Minimum
5-minute Arithmetic 5-minute Period Valid
Value Mean Median Value of Data Data
Sulfur
Dioxide (ppm)
Nitric
Oxide (ppm)
Nitrogen
Dioxide (ppm)
Total
Oxidant b (ppm)
Total Hydro-
carbon (ppm)
Carbon
Monoxide
(ppm)
Soiling Index
(COH/lOOOft)
Suspended
Particulates
( ft g/m3 )
0.99
0.60
0.30
0.24
25
31
6.0
389
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.015
3.5
7.0
1.60
137
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.01
3
7
1.4
121
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.5
<0.5
<0.05
49
1962-3
1962-3
1962-3
1962-3
May 1962-3
March-
Dec 1963
1963
1963
82%
74%
79%
68%
84%
50%
47%
88%
a See Appendix A for measurement methods
b Oxidant data are not corrected for the interference caused by
simultaneous sulfur dioxide occurrences (see Appendix A)
'The basic CAMP data on gaseous pollutants are neither precisely instantaneous pollutant concentrations nor 5-minute
average concentrations. The measurements represent the instantaneous value recorded by the instrument at 5 minute
intervals. However, each of the instrument values reflects some degree of integration resulting from the characteristics
of its instrument system.
T The effect of sulfur dioxide on the oxidant instrumentation is discussed in Appendix A.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
19
-------
J__L_L_LJ_J 1
TOTAL OXIDtNT
(Not Corrected lot SO21nterference)
i i r i i i
TOTAL HYOROC«I1!OH
1 I I I I I I I
30 50 70
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO
OR LESS THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO
OR LESS THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 2-1. Pollutant Levels in Six CAMP Cities, 1962 - 1963.
20
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
-------
Pollutant concentrations varied significantly
about the gross 2-year means indicated in Table
2-1. Despite a low average level of 0.030 ppm,
sulfur dioxide reached a maximum of nearly 1 ppm,
exceeded 0.10 ppm about 5 percent of the time,
and averaged about 0.5 ppm for half an hour or
longer on six occasions during the 2 years. Sulfur
dioxide levels exhibited a distinct seasonal pattern
(Figure 2-2); monthly mean concentrations ranged
an order of magnitude from a 0.005 ppm low in
May 1963 to a high of 0.055 during January 1963.
Oxides of nitrogen concentrations varied less
widely about their mean levels. Nitric oxide reached
a maximum of 0.60 ppm, and nitrogen dioxide,
0.30 ppm. On 5 days during the 2 years nitrogen
dioxide averaged 0.20 ppm or more for an hour
or longer; on at least two of these occasions the
high levels were accompanied by formation of
photochemical smog. *
Although nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide orig-
inate from the same sources, the variations in
concentrations from month to month were strik-
ingly different (Figure 2-2). Nitric oxide exhibited
a distinct pattern of high winter and low summer
levels, the monthly mean varying about five-fold
from a low of 0.010 ppm in June 1962 to a high
of 0.060 ppm in November 1962; in contrast,
monthly mean levels of nitrogen dioxide ranged
from 0.025 ppm (July 1963) to 0.045 ppm
(October 1963). This difference reflects the role
of solar radiation in atmospheric conversion of
NO to NO2. The effect of sunlight complements the
seasonal source strength pattern of nitric oxide and
largely negates such a pattern of nitrogen dioxide
emissions.
Total oxidant concentrations exhibited a high-
summer, low-winter, seasonal pattern due not only
to variations in the amount of photochemical re-
action but also to the changing levels of sulfur
dioxide interference (Figure 2-2). Average monthly
concentrations of total oxidant ranged from near
zero during the winter to 0.040 ppm during
September 1963. The peak 5-minute value for the
2 years was 0.24 ppm, and there were four hours
of values of about 0.20 ppm. The concentrations
of total oxidant equalled those recorded during the
photochemical smog incident previously mentioned
(0.10 ppm for seyeral hours) on at least 17 days
during the 2 years.
Total hydrocarbon concentrations ranged from a
low monthly mean of 1.9 ppm during May 1962
to a high of 4.6 ppm in December 1962; levels
exceeded 5 ppm 10 percent of the time and 8 ppm
2 percent of the time, and reached a maxima of 20
ppm or higher on five occasions. Although monthly
mean levels were more often below average in the
summer and above in the winter, no consistent
pattern was demonstrated (Figure 2-2).
Carbon monoxide concentrations averaged
7 ppm, with a maximum of 31 ppm. Valid data,
however, were so sparse because of instrumentation
difficulties th'at the levels recorded may not be
representative. Monthly mean concentrations varied
from 4.0 to 10.5 ppm for the 4 data months that
were valid, t
HOO
+50
0
-50
+50
0
-50
+50
0
-50
H50
HOO
+50
0
-50
100
0
-r,0
SULFUR DIOXIDE _ |
1.. Illll
••••• 'II
.1 '
'III'
.. _ NITROGEN DIOXIDE
- • - • - - -
• _.r
NITRIC OXIDE |
.llll
•••ir
. ,1.
I" •
TOTAL OXIDANTINot corrected for SO 2 interfere
• III
nr -IIIM
nee) 1
llll
'II
TOTAL HYDROCARBON |
| • * DATA BEGINS MAY 8
JAN APR JULY OCT JAN APR JULY OCT
1962 1943
Figure 2-2. Monthly Variation of Gaseous Pollutant Levels.
POLLUTANT INTERRELATIONSHIPS
All of the pollutants exhibited distinct diurnal
variations; the 2-year average patterns and those
for each season are presented in Figure 2-3. Except
for total oxidant, each pollutant's pattern showed
several similar characteristics related to diurnal
changes in atmospheric dilution and pollutant
emission rates. The most obvious were morning
peak levels, caused by fumigation with the pollu-
tants accumulated overnight in low level inversions,
and by the concurrent increase in emissions of
most pollutants with the start of the day's activities.
These peaks occurred at different times for the
various pollutants, and were all followed by a
decrease to the low point of the pattern as the
dilution capacity of the atmosphere increased to a
maximum in the afternoon.
"May 16 and 17, 1962, as reported in Reference 10.
tThe criterion used to define valid "data months", "data hours", etc., is that more than half the component data must
have been valid (see Part 3).
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
21
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE
(MAR-DEC 1963)
10 12 2
HOUR OF DAY (E5TI
WINTER (Insufficient volid data
for Carbon Monoxide)
Figure 2-3. Diurnal Variation Patterns
of Gaseous Pollutant Levels.
10 !2 2
HOUR OF DAY (E5T)
0.00
4 6
AM
8 10 12 2
HOUR OF DAY (E5T)
10
9
B
7
L 6
L
5
4
3
O.Os'
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
CARBON MONOXIDE
TOTAL HYDROCARBON
NIIRIC ~ NITROGEN
OXIDE/A DIOXIDE
TOTAL OXIDANT
12 2
6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8
AM . PM
10
HOUR OF DAY (ESTI
AUTUMN
CARBON MONOXIDE
10 12 2
HOUR OF DAY (ESTI
22
POLLUTANT INTERRELATIONSHIPS
-------
All the pollutants except sulfur dioxide and total
oxidant exhibited increased levels during the even-
ing with lessened atmospheric dilution, followed by
a decrease in the early morning as human activities
were curtailed. The sulfur dioxide pattern showed
only a slight increase from 5 to 7 p.m., perhaps
because of evening heating and the decreasing
atmospheric dilution capacity; levels then remained
essentially constant throughout the night.
The diurnal pattern of total oxidant levels was
essentially the opposite of the others, with higher
levels in the afternoon. This pattern reflects in-
creased photochemical smog formation during the
daytime hours in summer and the effects of the
variable interference with the oxidant measurements
by the changing levels of sulfur dioxide. Thus the
low nocturnal levels in summer were further de-
pressed in the morning when sulfur dioxide began to
increase, and essentially no oxidant was recorded
during the winter.
Concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and carbon
monoxide varied little with respect to wind direction
at the site (Figure 2-4). For each of the other
pollutants, however, levels were significantly higher
during hours when the wind was from a specific
direction. Sulfur dioxide levels were highest when the
winds were from the southsouthwest, indicating an
effect from the downtown power plant. Nitric oxide
and total hydrocarbon levels were highest with
northwesterly winds, the former sharply so. The
causes of these latter effects have not been determined
with certainty, but they may be related to the nearby
switching of diesel locomotives and sewage treat-
ment operations, respectively.
In addition to an understanding of the nature
and magnitude of the long- and short-term varia-
tions in levels of individual pollutants, the degree to
which the several pollutants tend to vary together
is also of interest. Some of the interrelationships
among the pollutants can be quantitated by correla-
tion and regression analyses. Although compre-
hensive correlation and regression analyses of the
CAMP data are not yet available, the results of
preliminary studies are presented herein.
Table 2-2 presents simple linear correlation co-
efficients between hourly mean concentrations of
various pairs of pollutants.* The correlations are
all positive and, with the exception of those between
sulfur dioxide and nitric oxide, and sulfur dioxide
and hydrocarbons, show no difference between
summer and winter. On the basis of the similarities
in the diurnal variations of the pollutants, compared
in the table, the positive correlations were expected.
The simple linear correlations presented in Table
2-2 represent only the apparent relationship between
two pollutants. Such relationships may be real or
may reflect the dependency of the concentration of
each pollutant on other factors. These difficulties in
interpretation can be largely eliminated by using
partial linear correlation coefficients. The partial
coefficients are interpreted as representing the degree
of relationship between two pollutants if the con-
centration of the other pollutants were held constant.
Partial correlation coefficients between pairs of
the four pollutants are presented in Table 2-3. They
indicate that there is no relationship between sulfur
dioxide and total hydrocarbon in winter or summer
and that the relationships between NOa and NO,
and NO 2 and hydrocarbon, are dependent upon
other factors, since the partial correlation coefficients
are significantly lower than the corresponding
simple coefficients.
In each analysis the coefficients for both seasons
show a strong relationship between nitric oxide and
hydrocarbons, no doubt indicative of a major
common source.
The predominance of positive correlations
in Tables 2-2 and 2-3 is no doubt strongly in-
fluenced by factors of meteorology and source
strength not included in this analysis. Since a
more extensive analysis of the data is in progress,
further and more detailed discussion of the signi-
ficance of the correlations among pollutants will be
deferred to a later publication.
TABLE 2-2
SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS
Cincinnati
Winter 1962-1963 Summer 1963
SO 2- NO
SO2-NO2
SO 2- Hydrocarbon
NO -N02
NO - Hydrocarbon
NO2- Hydrocarbon
+0.39
+0.44
+0.32
+0.48
+0.72
+0.50
+0.098
+0.39
+0.1 la
+0.50
+0.72
+0.49
Not significantly different from zero
TABLE 2-3
PARTIAL LINEAR CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS
Cincinnati
Winter 1962-1963 Summer 1963
S02 - NO
S02 - NO
SO 2" Hydrocarbon
NO - NO2
NO - Hydrocarbon
NO2- Hydrocarbon
+0.31
+0.34
+0.138
+0.31
+ 0.70
+0.42
-0.08B
+0.40
-0.03'
+0.25
+0.62
+0.22
' Not significantly different from zero
'Total oxidant has been omitted because of the SOjinterference; carbon monoxide because of the small amount of valid
data.
POLLUTANT INTERRELATIONSHIPS
23
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CARBON MONOXIDE
ppm
SULFUR DIOXIDE
N
NITRIC OXIDE
ppm
ppm
TOTAL HYDROCARBON
ppm
Figure 2-4. Mean Pollutant Levels Versus Wind Direction, December 1962 - November 1963.
24
POLLUTANT INTERRELATIONSHIPS
-------
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
This section presents more detailed extensions of
the several analyses of the data in an attempt to
provide additional insight into behavior of
pollutants, and to identify and partially quantitate
the various factors contributing to variations of
pollutant concentrations.
Sulfur Dioxide
Pollution of the air by sulfur dioxide in Cincinnati
results almost exclusively from fuel combustion for
space heating and industrial processes. The depend-
ence of atmospheric sulfur dioxide concentrations
on space heating demand is demonstrated graphi-
cally in Figure 2-5.* The concentrations recorded
during the summer months (approximately 0.01
ppm during 1962 and 1963) represent the rela-
tively constant contribution of fuel combustion and
power generation for industrial processes.
« 50
5 40
-------
due entirely to source strength increases would not
be expected to vary seasonally. Thus at least a
portion of the peak levels was due to fumigation.
The time of occurrence of the morning peaks did,
in fact, roughly follow the pattern suggested by
seasonal changes in atmospheric dilution factors.
During the spring months, the peak levels shift,
with the sunrise, to an earlier hour; in the summer
and fall, as the dilution capacity decreases and
persistent inversions occur more frequently, the
time of occurrence becomes progressively later
again.
The fumigation peaks in the summer months
were not preceded by any obvious nocturnal ac-
cumulations. This apparently indicates that
industrial emissions from elevated stacks, which
would predominate during the summer, can ac-
cumulate aloft until morning without being recorded
at the ground-level station. In whiter, when low-
level residential and commercial sources contribute
significantly to sulfur dioxide pollution, increased
levels in the early evening were frequently recorded.
Frequency distributions of the concentrations
of sulfur dioxide are presented in Table 2-4.*
During 1962 and 1963 the concentration of sulfur
dioxide exceeded 0.1 ppm about 5 percent of the
tune. The difference between summer and winter
levels of this pollutant was quite apparent (Figure
2.7). During the summer the level of sulfur dioxide
rarely exceeded 0.1 ppm (less than 2 percent of the
data); however, this level was exceeded by about
10 percent of the data during winter.
TABLE 2-4
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS
Cincinnati, 1962-1963
JAN 1962
FEE 1962
MAR 1962
APR 1962
MAY 1962
JUN 1962
JUL 1962
AUG 1962
SEP 1962
OCT 1962
NOV 1962
DEC 1962
YEAR 1962
JAN 1963
FEB 1963
MAR 1963
APR 1963
MAY 1963
JUN 1963
JUL 1963
AUG 1963
SEP 1963
OCT 1963
NOV 1963
DEC 1963
YEAR 1963
TWO YEARS
1962-1963
SPRING 62
SUMMER 62
FALL 1962
WINTER 62-63
SPRING 63
SUMMER 63
FALL 1963
AVG'G
TIME
5MIN
5MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
5 MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
PERCENT
OF DATA
VALID
88.5
33.1
75.5
91.8
61.2
61.9
43.4
55.6
72.2
89.6
98.4
98.6
72.7
98.3
98.7
98.4
94.7
59.3
86.8
92.2
89.4
91.2
90.0
98.4
94.2
90.9
81.8
76.0
53.5
86.8
98.5
84.0
89.5
93.2
CONCENTRATION,
parts per million
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION, percent
MIN
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
00
.00
.00
.00
10
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.02
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.02
.00
.00
.00
30
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
.00
.00
.01
.01
.02
.02
.03
.01
.01
.01
.02
.03
.03
.01
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.02
.01
01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.00
.02
.03
.00
.00
.01
50
.03
.03
.03
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.03
.03
.04
.02
.03
.03
.03
.04
.04
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.03
.01
02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.03
.04
.01
.01
.111
70
.05
.04
.04
.03
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.06
.04
.06
.04
.04
.04
.04
.06
.05
.03
.02
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.03
.05
.03
03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.04
.03
.02
.04
.06
.02
.01
.02
90
.08
.08
.06
.06
.05
.04
.04
.05
.04
.09
.08
.10
.07
.07
.07
.07
.11
.09
.06
.04
.01
.04
.03
.02
.04
.05
.07
.08
.06
06
.06
.06
.07
.07
.07
.06
.06
.04
.08
10
.05
.03
.05
92
.09
.09
.06
.07
.05
.05
.05
.05
.04
.09
.09
.10
.08
.08
.08
.07
.12
.10
.07
.05
.02
.05
.03
.03
.04
.06
.08
.09
.07
07
.07
.06
.08
.08
.08
.07
.06
.05
.08
.10
.05
.03
.06
94
.10
.10
.07
.08
.06
.06
.07
.06
.05
.10
.10
.11
.09
.09
.09
.07
.13
.10
.08
.06
.03
.05
.04
.03
.05
.07
.10
.09
.08
08
.08
.07
.09
.09
.09
.07
.07
.06
.09
12
.06
.04
.07
96
.12
.11
.08
.10
.07
.07
.09
.08
.07
.11
.11
.13
.10
.10
.10
.08
.16
.12
.09
.07
.05
.07
.06
.05
.06
.08
.12
.11
.10
10
.09
.07
.10
.10
.10
.08
.09
.08
.11
.14
.08
.06
.09
98
.15
.14
.12
.12
.10
.12
.12
.12
.10
.14
.14
.16
.14
.13
.12
.09
.21
.15
.11
.09
.08
.11
.09
.07
.08
.12
.18
.12
.13
13
.12
.09
.13
.13
.12
.09
.11
.12
.13
17
.10
.09
.13
MAX
.84
.40
.52
.26
.33
.36
.55
.45
.43
.35
.68
.52
.84
.50
.46
.11
.68
.32
.43
.60
.38
.67
.50
.99
.33
.82
.55
.28
.99
62
.48
.11
.99
.62
.48
.11
.52
.55
.68
68
.60
.99
.82
ARITH
MEAN
.045
.040
.035
.030
.020
.015
.020
.020
.020
.040
.040
.050
.035
.055
.045
.025
.020
.005
.015
.010
.010
.015
.020
.035
.040
.025
.030
.030
.020
.035
.050
.015
.010
.025
'The interpretation of frequency distribution analyses and their application to CAMP data are discussed in Appendix A.
26
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
GPO 821-653—3
-------
Also included in Table 2-4 are distributions of
sulfur dioxide concentrations for averaging times
longer than 5 minutes. Little difference is noted
among these distributions except for the various
maxima. The peak 5-minute value for the 2 years
was 0.99 ppm, about twice the peak hourly average
of 0.48 ppm and about ten times the maximum
daily average of 0.11 ppm.
The occurrence of the maximum sulfur dioxide
concentrations was unusual and worthy of note;
the 5-, 10-, and 30-minute maxima were all set
during a brief period of extremely high pollution
on August 22, 1963, during a period of generally
quite low levels (see Table 3-21). The explanation
lies in a shift of the previously northwest wind to
a direction from the downtown power plant toward
the CAMP station. Figure 2-8 presents in greater
detail the sulfur dioxide concentrations and wind
directions on the morning of August 22, 1963.
The hourly mean concentrations in Tables 3-2
through 3-25 also indicate several other occasions
on which sulfur dioxide concentrations rose sharply
for various periods of time. A dosage* analysis
was made on the 5-minute data to document such
occurrences. Table 2-5 summarizes, by month, the
frequency and duration of occasions when sulfur
dioxide levels reached or exceeded the 98th per-
centile concentration of the 2-year cumulative
frequency distribution (0.13 ppm); such sulfur
dioxide dosage events occurred on over 1000
separate occasions during the 2-year period. During
86 percent of these events the levels remained high
for less than 30 minutes. On two occasions the
period of high levels was longer than 4 hours.
These two events, one during the late morning
of December 3, 1962, and the other during the
early morning of January 10, 1963, accounted for
5 percent of the total dosage and 4 percent of the
total time represented by the dosage events tabu-
lated in Table 2-5. In contrast, while the 860
short-duration events accounted for only 10 per-
cent of the total dosage, they- represented about
60 percent of the total time.
About half of the events lasting 30 minutes or
longer occurred during the winter months, only
about one-tenth in summer, t Thus the analysis
indicates not only that most of the dosage occurred
during a relatively few long events, but also that
the frequency of occurrence of these longer events
tends to follow the seasonal pattern of sulfur dioxide
levels in general.
0 10
0.08
/ JANUARY 1963
/
ts WINTER 19623
rw° YEAI!S
SUMMER 1963
/• MAY 1963
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO
OR LESS THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 2-7. Frequency Distributions of Sulfur Dioxide
Concentrations.
9 10
HOUR OF DAY (ESI)
figure 2-8. Sulfur Dioxide Concentration and W ind Direction
on August 22,1963.
*A contrived time-concentration value giving emphasis to higher concentrations (see Appendix A); since this concept is
still in the developmental stages as an index of pollutant exposure, the analysis is used herein only to search for the
highest pollutant levels.
T Among these latter was the event that included the August 22 maximum for the 2 years, which appears as one of the
four events lasting '/i to 4 hours during August 1963.
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
27
-------
TABLE 2-5
OCCURRENCES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE
LEVELS 0.13 ppm OR GREATER
1962
< 30mini-4hr
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
68
23
36
44
32
42
28
24
24
55
60
60
496
9
2
4
4
2
2
1
3
3
8
8
13
59
>4hr
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1963
Total < 30 min l-4hr>4hr Total
77
25
40
48
34
44
29
27
27
63
68
74
556
1962-
1963
66
47
29
23
18
27
29
22
17
17
37
32
364
860
2
26
13
3
2
1
3
3
4
3
9
13
8
88
147
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
93
60
32
25
19
30
32
26
20
26
50
40
453
1009
1962-
1963
170
85
72
73
53
74
61
53
47
89
118
114
1009
Oxides of Nitrogen
Nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide are produced
by any high-temperature combustion process using
air as an oxygen source. In Cincinnati such com-
bustion utilizes primarily gasoline and fuel oil.
The gasoline consumption rate is relatively con-
stant throughout the year, while usage of fuel oil
and coal follows a seasonal pattern.
Levels of the oxides of nitrogen are also in-
fluenced by the atmospheric conversion of nitric
oxide to nitrogen dioxide. The rate of this con-
version is in turn affected by the intensity of solar
radiation just as it affects the production of photo-
chemical smog.
If it were not for this photochemical conversion,
both oxides of nitrogen would be expected to have
shown a seasonal variation pattern similar to that
of sulfur dioxide, following the increased fuel usage
for space heating in the winter. Instead, nitrogen
dioxide levels exhibited essentially no seasonal
pattern, while nitric oxide showed a pattern more
accentuated than was expected (Figure 2-9). This
is the result of high rate of conversion of NO to
NO 2 in the summer, which subtracts from the
already low nitric oxide levels and adds to the
minimum levels of nitrogen dioxide. The seasonal
0.05
0.04
I 0.03
^ 0.02
Q 0.01
0.00
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
ililiilinlllinlilllii
0.00
pattern of nitric oxide was further accentuated by
very high levels during periods of poor atmospheric
dilution, particularly in November 1962 and
October 1963.
Nitric oxide concentrations also exhibited pro-
nounced diurnal variability (Figure 2-10), reflecting
the same three factors that contributed to the
seasonal pattern. The rate of conversion to nitrogen
dioxide, the dilution capacity of the atmosphere,
and the strength of combustion sources, all in-
fluenced by daily sunlight patterns, combined to
produce three consistent features in all the monthly
patterns.
0.08
0.04
0
0.08
0.04
JAN
illllll
FEB
Illllll
lIlillL.
iiiiiiii
0.08
0.04
0
0.08
0.04
0
0.08
0.04,
0
0.08
E 0.04
Q.
2 °
g 0.08
I 0.04
I °
g 0.08
0.04
0
0.08
0.04
. MARCH
lllli.lllllil. •••••••••
APRIL
Illlllllll.
-in
. MAY
Illllllll
l.
JUNE
Illlllll
JULY
lllllllll...
...... ill
0.08
0.04
0.08
0.04
0
0.08
0.04
0
SEPT | |
Illlllllll,.
.00
I... ...I
NOV
Mliillllllli. .illilln
DEC
• •••••••Mill! •••••••••
1224 A flinl? 4 A R 10
12 2 4 6
AM
10 12 4 6 8 10
HOUR OF DAY (E5T) PM
Figure 2-9. Monthly Mean Oxides of Nitrogen Concentrations.
Figure 2-10. Diurnal Patterns of Nitric Oxide Concentrations.
28
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
-------
The minima during the afternoon (like the low
summer levels) are attributable to maximum con-
version to nitrogen dioxide, enhanced atmospheric
dilution potential, and minimum emissions from
combustion. * These minima accordingly varied
with the seasons from near-zero in the summer to
0.035 ppm during December and January.
The high overnight concentrations of nitric oxide
are due to the reversal of these three factors (con-
version rate, dilution capacity, and source strength)
in the absence of solar radiation. During late fall
and winter the levels began to increase in late
afternoon, reached a maximum by 6 p.m., re-
mained fairly constant until midnight, and then
declined. The nocturnal peaks shifted seasonally
to a later hour and a higher concentration with
changes in source strength and atmospheric dilution
capacity. After the nocturnal maxima were reached,
the pollutant levels usually declined, with decreased
human activity, until influenced by the factors
causing the third effect -- the sharp morning peaks.
These morning peaks were the result of the
beginning of daily activities and of fumigation with
pollutants accumulated overnight in low-level in-
versions; peak concentrations varied from 0.03 to
0.10 ppm. The time of occurrence varied seasonally,
from 6 to 7 a.m. in the summer to 9 a.m. in the
winter, reflecting the varying persistence of the
nocturnal inversions.
The diurnal patterns of variation in nitrogen
dioxide levels (Figure 2-11) are similar to, but not
nearly so pronounced as, those of nitric oxide,
because of the conversion effect. From November
through February, the nitrogen dioxide levels are
nearly constant throughout the day. A definite
morning peak (8 to 9 a.m.) and an evening ac-
cumulation occur from May through October. The
morning peaks of nitrogen dioxide occured 1 to 2
hours later than the peaks of nitric oxide, pre-
sumably because of the time required to effect the
conversion triggered by sunlight.
Frequency distributions of the oxides of nitrogen
are presented in Tables 2-6 and 2-7 and are com-
pared graphically in Figure 2-12. The two sets
of curves differ in two respects; the greater seasonal
differences in nitric oxide levels spaces the curves
farther apart than those of nitrogen dioxide, and
the greater variability of nitric oxide levels, both
diurnal and seasonal, also makes its set of curves
far steeper than those for nitrogen dioxide.
Monthly summaries of dosage events, analogous
to that presented for sulfur dioxide, are given in
Tables 2-8 and 2-9. The occurrence of the highest
2 percent of the values was concentrated in far fewer
individual events than was the case for sulfur
dioxide. This reflects the longer integrating time of
the oxides of nitrogen instruments, which smooths
out the shortest peaks. It may also reflect the fact
0.04
o
0.0.1
0
0.04
0
0.04
0
0.04
0
0.04
5. °
|0.04
< 0
C£
u 0.04
° n
0.04
0
0.04
0
0.04
0
0.04
0
JAN
Illlllllllllll Illllllll
- FEB
••••••••Illlll Illllllll
. MARCH J
Illlllllllllll Illllllll 1
APRIL
Illlllllllllll ••Illllll
Illlllllll lllll
JUNE •
Illlllllllll. ||||
JULY
••••••••Him ••••lllll
lilliilllllli. .Illlllll
Illlllllllllll illllllll
OCT
llmiiillllli illllllll
„ NOV
••••••••••ilii miiim
DEC I
Illlllllllllll Illllllll 1
12 2 4 6 8 lo '•' ? •' o d !'•'
AM HOUR OF DAYIES1 PM
Figure 2-11. Diurnal Patterns of Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations.
that while sulfur dioxide tends to come from large
single sources, the sources of oxides of nitrogen
are more dispersed and thus less apt to produce
discrete times of high levels.
The monthly distributions of events for both
oxides of nitrogen roughly followed an expected
pattern. The greatest numbers of nitric oxide events
occurred in the autumn months, with poorest
dilution, and the least occurred in the summer
months, when conversion to nitrogen dioxide was
greatest. Nitrogen dioxide events were also more
frequent during the autumn; however, the com-
parison with summer and spring was not so strik-
ing, apparently because of the increased nitrogen
dioxide levels caused by the conversion. Thus
during 1962 and 1963 long events of nitrogen
'The lack of data from 2 to 3 p.m. in Figures 2-10 and 2-1
oxides instruments.
is due to the daily zero check performed on the nitrogei
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
29
-------
TABLE 2-6
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF NITRIC OXIDE CONCENTRATIONS
Cincinnati, 1962-1963
JAN 1962
FEB 1962
MAR 1962
APR 1962
MAY 1962
JUNE 1962
JUL 1962
AUG 1962
SEP 1962
OCT 1962
NOV 1962
DEC 1962
YEAR 1962
JAN 1963
FEB 1963
MAR 1963
APR 1963
MAY 1963
JUN 1963
JUL 1963
AUG 1963
SEP 1963
OCT 1963
NOV 1963
DEC 1963
YEAR 1963
TWO YEARS
1962-1963
SPRING 62
SUMMER 62
FALL 1962
WINTER 62-63
SPRING 63
SUMMER 63
FALL 1963
AVG'G
TIME
5 MIN
5MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
5 MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
PERCENT
OF DATA
VALID
63.6
88.9
86.3
58.8
68.6
85.7
60.9
91.5
74.9
87.1
71.6
69.2
75.5
26.1
64.9
82.0
87.6
91.9
76.2
75.7
75.1
61.7
70.2
81.7
81.7
72.9
74.2
71.3
79.3
78.0
53.0
87.2
75.7
71.2
r
MIN
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
CONCENTRATION,
parts per million
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION, percent
10
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
30
.02
.01
.01
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.01
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.02
.01
.01
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.00
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
50
.03
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.03
.04
.03
.02
.02
.02
.02
.04
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.03
.03
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.03
.03
.01
.01
.03
70
.05
.03
.03
.03
.02
.01
.01
.02
.03
.05
.06
.04
.03
.03
.03
.04
.05
.03
.03
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.05
.07
.04
.03
.03
.03
.03
.04
.03
.03
.03
.04
.03
.01
.05
.04
.02
.02
.05
90
.07
.06
.06
.08
.05
.04
.03
.08
.12
.12
.12
.11
.08
.08
.08
.07
.09
.06
.08
.06
.07
.10
.04
.08
.10
.14
.08
.05
.08
.08
.08
.06
.08
.08
.08
.06
.06
.05
.12
.09
.07
.08
.11
92
.08
.06
.06
.09
.06
.04
.04
.10
.13
.13
.14
.13
.09
.09
.09
.08
.10
.07
.09
.09
.08
.12
.05
.10
.11
.15
.09
.06
.10
.10
.10
.07
.09
.09
.09
.07
.07
.06
.13
.10
.09
.09
.12
94
.09
.07
.07
.11
.08
.05
.05
.11
.15
.15
.17
.15
.11
.11
.11
.09
.11
.08
.12
.11
.10
.14
.06
.12
.13
.16
.10
.06
.11
.11
.11
.08
.11
.11
.11
.09
.08
.08
.15
.12
.11
.11
.14
96
.10
.09
.08
.13
.10
.07
.06
.13
.17
.17
.21
.17
.13
.13
.13
.10
.13
.12
.15
.14
.12
.16
.07
.13
.16
.18
.11
.08
.13
.13
.13
.10
.13
.13
.13
.09
.10
.10
.18
.15
.13
.13
.16
98
.16
.16
.11
.16
.13
.09
.07
.16
.21
.20
.27
.24
.18
.18
.18
.11
.16
.17
.20
.17
.14
.18
.09
.15
.19
.22
.13
.11
.17
.17
.16
.12
.17
.17
.17
.11
.13
.12
.22
.21
.17
.16
.19
MAX
.42
.46
.26
.32
.28
.14
.19
.23
.33
.34
.60
.42
.60
.60
.58
.29
.28
.40
.38
.26
.27
.26
.18
.28
.25
.54
.28
.21
.54
.52
.50
.14
.60
.60
.58
.29
.32
.23
.60
.42
.38
.28
.54
ARITH
MEAN
.040
.030
.025
.025
.025
.010
.015
.025
.040
.045
.060
.045
.030
.050
.035
.035
.025
.025
.035
.020
.030
.040
.055
.035
.025
.030
.030
.025
.015
.045
.040
.025
.030
.045
30
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
-------
TABLE 2-7
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS
Cincinnati, 1962-1963
JAN 1962
FEE 1962
MAR 1962
APR 1962
MAY 1962
JUN 1962
JUL 1962
AUG 1962
SEP 1962
OCX 1962
NOV 1962
DEC 1962
YEAR 1962
JAN 1963
FEE 1963
MAR 1963
APR 1963
MAY 1963
JUN 1963
JUL 1963
AUG 1963
SEP 1963
OCT 1963
NOV 1963
DEC 1963
YEAR 1963
TWO YEARS
1962-1963
SPRING 62
SUMMER 62
FALL 1962
WINTER 62-63
SPRING 63
SUMMER 63
FALL 1963
AVG'G
TIME
5MIN
5MIN
30MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5MIN
5MIN
30MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5MIN
30MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5MIN
PERCEIS
OF DATj
VALID
54.0
80.8
90.3
74.7
80.3
85.1
70.0
81.0
82.8
88.6
81.0
59.2
77.2
66.2
83.8
86.2
88.0
67.4
79.0
71.2
77.8
83.7
86.8
82.3
85.5
79.8
78.5
81.9
78.6
84.2
69.3
80.4
76.0
84.6
\T
\
MIN
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
• .00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
CONCENTRATION, parts per million
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION, percent
10
.00
.01
.02
01
.00
.00
.01
.02
.01
.00
.02
.01
.01
.01
.01
.02
.02
0?
.00
.01
.01
.02
.00
.02
.02
.02
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.01
.02
.01
.01
.02
30
.02
.02
.03
0?
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
.03
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
.02
50
.03
.03
.04
03
.03
.02
.03
.03
.03
.02
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.02
.02
.03
.04
.02
.03
.03
.04
.02
.02
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.02
.03
.03
70
.04
.03
.04
.04
.04
.03
.03
.04
.04
.03
.03
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
.03
.04
.03
.03
.03
.05
.03
.03
.04
.05
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.03
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
.04
.03
.04
.03
.04
.04
90
.05
.04
.06
Of>
.06
.05
.05
.06
.05
.04
.04
.06
.05
.05
.05
.04
.05
.05
.04
.05
.05
.06
.04
.05
.06
.07
.04
.04
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.04
.05
.06
92
.05
.04
.06
.05
.06
.05
.05
.07
.05
.05
.04
.07
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
05
.04
.05
.05
.07
.05
.05
.06
.07
.04
.04
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
.06
.06
.05
.05
.05
.06
.06
94
.06
.04
.06
.06
.07
.05
.05
.07
.06
.05
.05
.08
.06
.06
.06
.05
.05
05
.04
.05
.05
.07
.05
.05
.07
.08
.04
.04
.06
.06
.06
.05
.06
.06
.06
.05
.06
.06
.05
.06
.05
.06
.07
96
.06
.05
.06
.06
.07
.06
.06
.08
.06
.06
.05
.09
.06
.06
.06
.05
.06
.06
.05
.05
.06
.08
.05
.06
.07
.09
.04
.04
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.05
.06
.07
.06
.07
.05
.07
.08
98
.07
.05
.07
.06
.09
.07
.06
.10
.06
.07
.06
.11
.07
.07
.07
.06
.06
07
.06
.06
.06
.09
.06
.08
.09
.10
.05
.05
.07
.07
.07
.06
.07
.07
.07
.06
.07
.08
.06
.08
.06
.08
.09
MAX
.10
.16
.11
09
.26
.14
.13
.20
.14
.15
.25
.30
.30
.28
.25
.09
.09
21
.11
.11
.08
.23
.12
.18
.17
.17
.08
.07
.23
.21
.20
.08
.30
.28
.25
.09
.26
.20
.25
.30
.11
.23
.17
ARITH
MEAN
.030
.025
.040
.030
.030
.025
.030
.035
.030
.025
.030
.035
.030
.030
.030
.025
.025
.025
.040
.025
.030
.035
.045
.025
.025
.030
.030
.035
.030
.030
.030
.025
.030
.035
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
31
-------
TABLE 2-8
OCCURRENCES OF NITRIC OXIDE
LEVELS 0.17 ppm OR GREATER
Monthly Summary
*
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
: 30mln
1
3
2
7
0
0
1
6
17
19
7
6
69
1962
2-4 hr>
4
2
1
o
1
0
0
7
10
9
17
4
60
1963
4hr
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
2
7
Total <
5
6
3
12
1
0
1
13
29
28
25
12
135
1962-
1963
30mln
3
0
6
4
3
10
2
1
2
10
3
1
45
114
i 4hr,
1
1
8
8
4
9
0
4
6
14
4
2
61
120
»4hr
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
11
Total
4
2
15
12
7
19
2
5
9
25
7
3
110
245
1962
9
8
18
24
8
19
3
18
38
53
32
15
245
TABLE 2-9
OCCURRENCES OF N1TROGEN DIOXIDE
LEVELS 0.07 pnm OR GREATER
Monthly Summary
1962
•e
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
30min
1
3
9
16
33
26
21
25
20
36
4
24
218
' 4hr
4
0
9
6
16
9
4
24
7
9
1
10
99
>4hr
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
4
9
Total <
6
3
19
22
50
35
25
50
27
45
6
38
326
1962-
1963
SOmin
3
6
7
7
8
42
12
3
19
36
5
3
151
369
1963
i^hr
1
3
3
2
1
20
2
6
12
23
2
1
76
175
>4hr
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
8
0
0
15
24
Total
5
10
11
10
9
63
14
9
33
67
7
4
242
568
1962-
1963
11
13
30
32
59
98
39
59
60
112
13
42
568
dioxide dosage occurred in almost every month of
the year, and of nitric oxide dosage in all but the
summer months.
Major periods of atmospheric stagnation
occurred during November and December 1962
and June and October 1963; the latter two months
in particular show a resultant high frequency of
dosage events. In general, such periods of poor
dilution tend to dominate the upper 2 percent of the
data, at least for those pollutants that come largely
from diffuse sources.
001
0.20
0.10
E 0.08
£ 0.04
LU
U
O
10 30 50 70
0.02 —
/NOVEMBER 1962
,'/ AUTUMN 1962
'/ ,
NITRIC OXIDE
10 30 50 70 90 98
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO OR LESS
THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 2-12. Frequency Distributions of Oxides of Nitrogen
Concentrations.
Total Oxidant
The recorded concentrations of total oxidant
exhibited definite seasonal variation (Figure 2-13).
Although oxidant levels would be expected to be
somewhat lower in the less sunny months, the
near-zero winter levels recorded were influenced
to some extent by the high winter concentrations
of sulfur dioxide, which acts as a reducing agent
and reverses the chemical reaction used as the
sensing mechanism for total oxidants.* Figure 2-14
presents recorded traces of oxidant levels from two
instruments operating side by side, one with and
one without an absorber device to remove sulfur
dioxide. The simultaneous trace of sulfur dioxide
levels is included; the effect on the recorded oxidant
levels is obvious.
Figure 2-15 presents the patterns of diurnal
variation recorded for total oxidant. The single
bar for 3 to 4 p.m. in the January pattern re-
presents 6 days (out of 24 valid data days) during
January 1962 and January 1963 when the hourly
*For details of the instrumentation see Appendix A.
32
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
-------
(Not corrected lor SO2 interference
0.00
JAN APRIL JULY OCT JAN APRIL JULY OCI
1962 1963
average oxidant level reached 0.01 ppm, the mini-
mum response of the instrument. In contrast, during
January 1964, with the sulfur dioxide interference
eliminated by the use of the absorber device, the
total oxidant concentration averaged 0.01 ppm for
the entire month.
During the warmer months of the year, when
oxidants were recorded in significant amounts,
there was still pronounced diurnal variability. The
formation of oxidants is partly dependent upon the
intensity of solar radiation; thus high levels were
reached before noon and persisted at a relatively
constant level until the late afternoon.
Figure 2-13. Monthly Mean Total Oxidant and Sulfur
Dioxide Concentrations.
= 0.60
z
o
0.40
0.20
o
u
0.00
I I
SULFUR DIOXIDE
I 0.06
a
< 0.04
O£
UJ
g°-02
u
0.00
I I I I
TOTAL OXIDANT (Without SO2 filter)
0.08
O
0.06
0.04
O
u
0.02
0.00
1 1
ABSORBER OFF
TOTAL OXIDANT
(With SO 2 filter)
PM
HOUR OF DAYIEST)
10
Figure 2-14. Effect of Sulfur Dioxide on Recorded Total Oxidant Measurements.
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
33
-------
Because the occurrence of measurable oxidant
values, even if not strictly quantitative, carries a
certain measure of information, the data have been
included in Part 3 of this report; however, much
of the analysis performed and reported for other
pollutants has been omitted for the oxidant data,
or has been restricted to data from the summer
months when sulfur dioxide levels were lowest.
Oxidant data unaffected by sulfur dioxide have
been obtained since early 1964 and will be pre-
sented in subsequent reports.
Total Hydrocarbon
The mean hydrocarbon concentration (Figure
2-16) generally varied only slightly, from month
to month, reflecting the predominance: of a re-
latively constant background (resulting from
naturally occurring methane and motor vehicle
traffic) throughout the year, rather than seasonal
combustion sources.* The higher means for
December 1962 and October 1963 are caused by
a few days of severe atmospheric stagnation, as
seen in Tables 3-104 and 3-114.
o
o
004
n
0.04
o
0.04
0.04
0.04
o
0.04
0.04
n
0.04
o
004
0
. JAN
. FEB
. MARCH
. APRIL
. MAY
. JUNE
_ JULY
. AUG
- SEPT
" • •
(No) corrected tor SC>2 Interference)
-
-
_— --••••••••I.
.1111111111....
.Illlllllll....
.1111111111....
.Illlllllll. ...
.Illlllllll
12 2 4 6
AM
10 12 2 4 6 8 10
PM
0.04
0.04
0.04
.•OCT
. NOV
DEC
12 24 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10
AM PM
HOUR OF DAY (EST)
Figure 2-15. Diurnal Patterns of Total Oxidant Concentrations.
O JAN APR JULY OCT JAN APR JULY OCT
1962
1963
Figure 2-16. Monthly Mean Total Hydrocarbon Concentrations.
Total hydrocarbon levels did not exhibit any
striking diurnal variation patterns (Figures 2-17). t
The absence of increased levels during peak traffic
hours is partially due to the high methane back-
ground, but may also reflect the manner in which
the instruments are used. CAMP operates the hydro-
carbon instruments on a scale of 1-40 ppm to
enable them to record the highest peak concentra-
tions. The sensitivity of this scale necessitates re-
cording concentrations of a few ppm to the nearest
one ppm, which in turn requires that the atmos-
pheric concentration change by nearly 20 percent
to register a change in the reported value.
The high nocturnal and morning levels that
are seen in the patterns tended to follow the sea-
sonal pattern of atmospheric dilution conditions.
The slightly depressed afternoon troughs probably
resulted from increased atmospheric dilution and
the photochemical conversion of some hydro-
carbons into immeasurable forms; the latter effect
is no doubt obscured by the background methane,
which does not participate in photochemical
reactions.
Frequency distributions of total hydrocarbon
concentrations are presented in Table 2-10 and
Figure 2-18. The peak 5-minute value was 25 ppm,
and the highest hourly mean was 17 ppm. The
concentration of hydrocarbons exceeded 8 ppm
less than 2 percent of the time. Table 2-10 also
indicates that hydrocarbon levels were the same
on weekdays and weekends, again probably re-
flecting the relatively constant methane background.
"Limited information indicates that methane accounts for 60 to 90 percent of the total hydrocarbons in Cincinnati.
tSince data were incomplete during 1962, Figure 2-17 represents only one year's data; the hourly average bars are
thus presented to the nearest whole unit recorded (the nearest 1 ppm) rather than the nearest half unit.
34
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
-------
TABLE 2-10
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS
Cincinnati, 1962-1963
AVG'G
TIME
MAY 1962 5MIN
JUNE 1962
JULY 1962
AUG 1962
SEPT 1962
OCT 1962
NOV 1962
DEC 1962
YEAR 1962 5 MIN
(May-Dec) 30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
JAN 1963 5 MIN
FEE 1963
MARCH 1963
APRIL 1963
MAY 1963
JUNE 1963
JULY 1963
AUG 1963
SEPT 1963
OCT 1963
NOV 1963
DEC 1963
YEAR 1963 5 MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
TWO YEARS 5 MIN
(5/62-12/63) 30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
SUMMER 1962 5 MIN
FALL 1962
WINTER 1962-3
SPRING 1963
SUMMER 1963
FALL 1963
WEEKENDS
WEEKDAYS
PERCEN'
OF DATA
VALID
72.7
89.3
49.1
0.0
48.8
89.3
91.7
99.4
67.4
89.5
95.8
98.5
97.8
99.1
94.9
88.1
95.9
96.4
96.9
91.6
85.5
94.1
83.5
45.7
76.8
94.9
98.5
92.9
95.0
84.6
80.7
CONCENTRATION,
MIN
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
parts
Frequency Distribution,
10
0
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
30
1
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
50
2
2
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
70
2
2
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
5
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
90
3
3
5
3
4
5
8
5
5
5
4
5
4
4
•4
4
5
4
5
5
8
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
4
4
5
6
4
5
6
5
5
per million as
C atom
percent
92
3
4
5
4
5
5
9
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
8
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
7
5
5
6
5
5
94
4
4
5
4
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
6
7
5
5
5
7
5
6
6
9
5
4
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
8
5
6
7
6
6
96
4
4
5
4
5
6
12
6
6
6
6
6
9
6
6
6
7
5
6
6
9
5
4 '
6
6
6
5
6
6
6
6
5
5
9
6
6
8
6
6
98
5
5
5
5
6
7
13
8
9
8
9
7
11
8
7
6
9
6
6
6
10
6
4
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
6
5
6
12
7
7
9
8
8
MAX
8
8
6
8
8
15
23
23
20
17
10
16
18
18
11
10
25
13
10
10
14
11
8
25
20
15
8
25
20
17
10
8
15
23
18
25
14
23
25
ARITH
MEAN
2.0
2.5
3.5
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.5
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.2
3.4
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
35
-------
4 . JAN
20
10
Q6
I
2
8
iMilMMlMMMMmlM
MARCH
lllhmiiiMMMmMM
APRIL
• •••••••I ••••••••••
•••••••••••••••••••••III
JUNE
• ••••••••••••••••••••Ml
JULY
•••••••••••••••••••••••I
AUG
•••••••••••••••••••••••I
SEPT
••••••••••••••••••••••II
OCT
lllllllll Mill
NOV
••••••••••••••••••••Nil
- DEC
• MiMMMMiimmim
12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10
AM HOUR OF DAY (E5T) PM
Figure 2-17. Diurnal Patterns of Total Hydrocarbon
Concentrations.
DECEMBER 1962
r> WINTER 1962-3
TWO YEARS
SUMMER 1962 .
• *? MAY 1962
2 10 30 50 70 90 98
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO
OR LESS THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 2-18. Frequency Distributions of Total Hydrocarbon
Concentrations.
The association of higher hydrocarbon levels
with westerly winds (Figure 2-4) indicates a major
source of hydrocarbon emissions west of the station.
Approximately one mile away, spreading over a
large area generally west of the sampling site, is
a large sewage treatment plant. It seems probable
that methane emitted from treatment processes at
this source was the influencing factor in this
directional pattern.
The distribution by month of dosage events
representing the highest 2 percent of the total hydro-
carbon measurements is presented in Table 2-11.
Nearly 80 percent of the individual events were
less than 15 minutes long, but several events lasted
4 hours or more and one lasted more than
16 hours.
TABLE 2-11
OCCURRENCES OF HYDROCARBON LEVELS
8 ppm OR GREATER
Monthly Summary
•• 30 mln +-'
4 hr
Total
1962
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
(M
Nciv
Dec
4
1
0
1
5
38
110
0 0
0 1).
0 II
No Data
0 0
0 II
1 1
16 6
4
1
(1
1
5
40
132
1963
Jan
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Nov
Dec
18
30
19
6
H
40
1
10
12
141
13
1
7
2
8
4
2
6
0
2
2
26
4
25
36
28
10
10
47
1
12
14
170
17
1
1962-
19B3
458
The events followed the occurrence of poor
dilution conditions even more closely than did the
nitric oxide events. The months of November and
December 1962 and June and October 1963 account
for 70 percent of all the events and for over half of
the events longer than 30 minutes. The high fre-
quency of short events during these months results
from hydrocarbon levels fluctuating almost con-
tinuously at about 8 ppm. The one extremely long
event lasted from 10 p.m. on December 2, 1962,
until past noon the next day, averaging 11.5 ppm
for over 16 hours.
Carbon Monoxide
The highest monthly mean levels of carbon
monoxide occurred during autumn, when atmos-
pheric dilution was poorest. The data are
so sparse,* however, that any definite conclusions
must await further information. The diurnal patterns
(Figure 2-19) show a more definite shape; nocturnal
accumulations and morning peaks are pronounced.
•Instrumentation difficulties are discussed in Appendix A.
36
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
-------
Illlll Illllll
JUNE
Illlllll
Illll
. JULY
II
g 12
nit
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillll
. DEC
3 5 7
AM
35 79 II
PM
HOUR OF DAY (EST)
Figure 2-19. Diurnal Patterns of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations.
The higher winter levels expected because of the
increase in emissions from space heating are not
obvious, perhaps obscured by the high autumn
levels. Again, however, the lack of data leaves
any interpretation open to question.
The cumulative frequency distributions of carbon
monoxide data are presented in Table 2-12 and
Figure 2-20. The high summer levels are unex-
pected, since carbon monoxide emissions from space.
heating should have been non-existent then. The
high summer values occurred primarily during
July. Although a stagnation period was not noted
at the time, poor atmospheric dilution appears to
be the only plausible explanation for the elevated
levels. A major stagnation in October 1963 is
definitely responsible for the increase in the upper
percentiles of the autumn distribution.
Frequency distributions for weekends and week-
days indicate a slight difference, with the weekday
curve generally higher, as expected. The final de-
finition of whether this difference is real, and, if so,
the extent to which it relates to automotive or other
combustion sources, depends upon the accumulation
and analysis of additional data.
A dosage analysis of carbon monoxide levels
similar to those performed for the other pollutants
has been omitted, since only 4 months of data were
more than 50 percent valid.
80
90
98
20 50
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO
OR LESS THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 2-20. Frequency Distributions of Carbon Monoxide
Concentrations.
Partlculates
In addition to the six gases monitored at the
Cincinnati CAMP station, particulate pollutants
were sampled during 1963. Although analyses of
the soiling index and suspended particulate data
are not extensive at present, the results that are
available are briefly summarized herein.
Figure 2-21 presents monthly mean values of
soiling index. Although the data are not complete,
they suggest a seasonal pattern similar to that
generally reported, i.e., one roughly following
seasonal variations in fuel consumption. Diurnal
patterns of soiling index levels for the months with
the highest and lowest means are presented in
Figure 2-22. During both months, the data exhibited
higher nocturnal levels and morning peaks, again
suggesting the influence of fuel consumption and
possibly of vehicular traffic.
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
37
-------
TABLE 2-12
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS
Cincinnati, 1962-1963
PERCEN1
AVG'G OF DATA
TIME VALID
MARCH 1963
APRIL 1963
MAY 1963
JUNE 1963
JULY 1963
AUG 1963
SEPT 1963
OCT 1963
NOV 1963
DEC 1963
YEAR 1963
(Mar- Dec)
SPRING 1963
SUMMER 1963
FALL 1963
WEEKENDS
WEEKDAYS
5 MIN
5 MIN
30 MIN
1 HR
24 HR
5 MIN
5 MIN
5 MIN
29.0
83.7
50.4
58.9
64.6
33.9
7.1
40.7
90.6
21.1
50.1
54.0
52.4
46.1
48.8
46.9
MIN
2
0
0
0
0
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
CONCENTRATION, parts per million
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION,
10
5
2
1
3
7
8
6
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
2
2
30
6
4
2
5
9
9
8
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
4
7
4
5
5
50
7
6
4
6
11
10
9
7
5
6
7
7
7
7
5
9
6
7
7
70
7
7
5
8
12
11
10
11
8
7
9
9
9
9
7
11
9
8
9
90
9
9
7
11
14
13
11
15
12
11
12
12
12
11
9
13
13
11
13
92
9
10
8
11
14
13
11
16
13
11
13
13
13
12
9
13
14
11
13
94
10
10
8
12
15
13
11
17
14
12
13
13
13
12
10
14
15
12
14
percent
96
11
11
9
13
15
14
12
18
15
13
14
14
14
13
11
15
16
12
15
98
13
12
10
15
16
15
12
20
17
14
16
16
16
15
12
15
18
13
16
MAX
29
31
20
30
22
19
15
23
25
26
31
23
23
16
31
30
25
22
31
ARITH
MEAN
7.0
5.5
3.5
6.5
10.5
10.0
9.5
7.5
6.0
6.0
7.0
5.5
9.0
7.5
6.5
7.0
OCT
12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12
Figure 2-21. Monthly Mean Soiling Index Levels.
Figure 2-22. Diurnal Patterns of Soiling Index Levels.
Figure 2-23 presents monthly mean values of
suspended particulate samples taken at the CAMP
station; Tables 2-13, 2-14, and 2-15 present fre-
quency distributions, by season* and for the year,
of the daily values, with distributions of data from
the Cincinnati NASN station for comparison.
Values for the total weight of suspended p ar-
ticulates exhibited no obvious seasonal pattern,
except for elevated levels during the major stag-
nation in October 1963. The weight of organic
particulates was also highest in autumn, particularly
hi October.
Values for gross beta radioactivity exhibited a
distinct seasonal pattern, with highest levels during
the spring. This pattern is typical of radioactive
pollution originating from nuclear weapons ex-
periments, which accumulates in the upper atmo-
sphere until brought down by seasonal changes
in the upper winds.
Figure 2-24 compares the annual frequency
distribution of weight of suspended particulates
from the CAMP and NASN stations. The sus-
pended particulate levels were slightly higher at the
CAMP station, probably because of its lower ele-
vation, although the nearby urban renewal and
highway construction may have contributed to
the difference. The CAMP curve is much smoother
because of the greater number of samples.
'The winter season includes January and February 1 963 with December 1963.
38
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
-------
5 -200
1|
z- e 150
Q £
< 3 100
Z a 50
o 15
I!
V E 10
Z a
TOTAL
SUSPENDED _
PARTICULATES •
Illllllllll
JAN APRIL JULY OCT
I
ORGANIC
PARTICULATES •
Illlllllllll
JAN APRIL JULY OCT
.300
i 200
£.150
o
I 100
E 80
Q 60
u
O
l I i i r T
CAMP (320 SAMPLES)
NASN (26 SAMPLES)"
I
I
I
10 20 30 50 70 80 90
PERCENT OF MEASUREMENTS EQUAL TO
OR LESS THAN STATED CONCENTRATION
Figure 2-24. Frequency Distributions of Concentrations of Total
Suspended Particulates: C AM P and NASN Sites, 1963.
10
z s
GROSS BETA
RADIOACTIVITY
Illllll
ll..
JAN
APR
JULY
OCT
Figure 2-23. Monthly Mean Levels of Paniculate Pollution.
TABLE 2-13
TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATES
Cincinnati CAMP Station, 1963
No. of
CAMP
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Year
NASN
Sam-
ples
73
76
83
88
320
26
Concentration, mlrrmrrnmq nfr ruhfr
Frequency Distribution.
Min
49
55
64
59
49
69
10
78
75
85
82
79
82
20
92
82
96
97
91
87
30
99
94
104
114
101
94
40
103
105
111
132
110
98
50
108
120
120
144
121
103
60
112
141
128
166
136
127
70
124
157
147
189
156
137
mptpr
Percent
80
144
173
165
229
179
151
90
209
188
191
257
219
180
Max
389
254
271
309
389
204
Arith
Mean
126
129
131
160
137
121
Geo
Mean
117
121
125
147
128
116
Std
Geo
Dev
1.43
1.45
1.36
1.53
1.46
1.36
TABLE 2-14
BENZENE - SOLUBLE ORGANIC MATTER
Cincinnati CAMP Station, 1963
No. of
CAMP
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Year
NASN
Sam-
ples
73
76
83
88
320
26
Concentration, micrograms per cubic
meter
Frequency Distribution, Percent
Min
2.2
1.6
2.2
3.4
1.6
3.0
10
4.5
3.4
4.5
6.0
4.5
5.8
20
5.4
4.6
5.3
7.2
5.6
6.5
30
6.2
5.7
6.2
7.8
6.5
7.2
40
6.7
6.3
7.1
9.5
7.2
7.8
50
7.5
6.9
7.9
10.5
8.2
8.8
60
9.1
8.3
9.0
13.5
9.6
10.3
70
10.7
9.1
10.2
16.1
11.1
11.1
80
12.1
10.5
11.6
19.8
14.0
12.2
90
18.5
13.9
15.2
23.2
19.6
14.4
Max
43.1
24.0
26.7
30.5
43.1
17.7
Arith
Mean
9.8
8.3
9.1
13.0
10.1
9.5
Geo
Mean
8.3
7.1
8.1
11.4
8.7
8.8
Std
Geo
Dev
1.74
1.75
1.62
1.70
1.74
1.51
BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POLLUTANTS
39
-------
TABLE 2-15
GROSS BETA RADIOACTIVITY OF SUSPENDED PARTICIPATE MATTER
Cincinnati CAMP Station, 1963
No. of
CAMP
Winter
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Year
Sam-
ples
42
76
83
88
289
Concentration, plcocuries per cubic meter
Frequency Distribution, Percent
Mln
0.3
1.3
1.2
.1
.1
10
0.4
3.5
3.3
.8
.9
20
0.6
5.5
4.7
1.2
1.5
30
0.8
7.4
6.0
1.5
2.2
40
0.9
8.6
7.5
1.7
3.4
50
1.0
10.0
8.3
2.0
4.9
60
1.2
11.1
9.2
2.3
7.1
70
1.9
11.9
10.1
2.9
8.9
80
7.2
14.9
11.4
3.5
10.6
90
10.7
17.0
13.7
4.5
13.2
Max
13.5
26.7
16.4
5.9
26.7
Arilh
Mean
3.3
10.2
8.3
2.4
6.3
Geo
Mean
1.7
8.8
7.3
2.0
4.1
Std
Geo
Dev
3.18
1.83
1.74
2.03
2.80
INCIDENTS OF HIGH POLLUTION
Although the occurrence of both exceptionally
low and exceptionally high pollutant levels is un-
usual, attention is understandably drawn more
to the periods of unusually high pollutant con-
centrations. Such periods of high pollution, as
measured at the CAMP station, may be caused
by the unusual influence of single large sources.
One sample of such a period (August 22, 1963)
is given in the previous discussion of sulfur dioxide.
An incident of this type generally affects only a
small portion of a community.
The more usual period of high pollution is of
longer duration and affects the community as a
whole. It is caused by periods of minimum natural
ventilation resulting from the prolonged intensifica-
tion of a nocturnal inversion or from a still longer
general atmospheric stagnation. The resulting
periods of pollution may or may not include photo-
chemical smog formation, depending on the in-
tensity of solar radiation. This section presents
several examples of high-pollution incidents in-
volving either intensive photochemical reaction or
lengthy stagnations.
Photochemical Smog
Incidents of photochemical smog formation on
May 16 and 17, 1962, were previously mentioned
(Reference 10), and an occurrence on November
30, 1962, is discussed in Reference 11. Two addi-
tional examples that occurred during 1963 are
presented graphically in Figure 2-25. In both cases
concentration of total oxidant exceeded 0.15 ppm
for at least an hour (the sulfur dioxide interference
on both dates was negligible), thus indicating the
formation of sufficient photochemical oxidants to
cause an accumulation despite the improved after-
noon dilution. These two events were both typical
of such photochemical smog incidents.
Atmospheric Stagnations
On several occasions during 1962 and 1963,
stagnating high-pressure systems affected the
Cincinnati area, with inversions and poor atmos-
pheric dilution conditions prevailing. Two parti-
cularly severe events occurred November 28
through December 4, 1962, and October 14 to 24,
1963. The former is documented in Reference 11.
Figures 2-26 and 2-27 compare patterns of diurnal
variation of pollutant levels during the stagnation
periods to normal seasonal levels. *
During the 1962, stagnation concentrations of
sulfur dioxide and total hydrocarbon averaged
80 percent above normal; nitrogen dioxide levels
more than doubled. The peak levels were even
more severely affected, as noted in Table 2-16.
Since the normal pattern of nitrogen dioxide
concentrations exhibits no distinct morning peak,
the large peak during the stagnation is apparently
due almost entirely to fumigation and conversion
of nitric oxide. The sulfur dioxide pattern exhibits
a similar effect, but a portion of the morning peak
was attributable to the increase in morning source
strength seen in the normal pattern. Total hydro-
carbon values exhibited a somewhat different
pattern, remaining roughly constant except for a
significant decrease in the afternoon at the time
of maximum dilution potential.
During the 1963 stagnation sulfur dioxide levels
were generally lower than normal as the result of
low heating demand. The morning fumigation,
however, caused levels considerably higher than
normal, presumably from the nocturnal accumula-
tion of industrial emissions at the inversion base.
The time of the morning peaks varied con-
siderably among the pollutants; total hydrocarbon
peaked at 7:30 a.m., nitric oxide and carbon
monoxide at 8:30, and sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
dioxide not until 10:30. The 2-hour lag between the
two oxides of nitrogen has been noted previously;
the differences among the others are presumably due
to the morning increases in emissions, which oc-
curred at varying times. The magnitude of the
effect of this stagnation is noted in Table 2-17.
"The normals used were average levels during November and December 1962 and October 1963, respectively, exclusive
of the stagnation period.
40
INCIDENTS OF HIGH POLLUTION
-------
0.15 —
I
Q.
0.00
0.20
0.15
0.05
SEPTEMBER 9, 1963
20
O
10
6
AM
10 12 2
HOUR OF DAY (ESI)
6
PM
10 12
Figure 2-25. Pollutant Levels during Incidents of Photochemical
Smog Formation.
TABLE 2-16
COMPARISON OF STAGNATION AND
NORMAL POLLUTANT LEVELS
NOVEMBER 28 TO DECEMBER 4, 1962, INCIDENT
Cincinnati
RATIO OF CONCENTRATIONS
Sulfur
Dioxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
STAGNATION
PEAK HOUR
TO
STAGNATION
DAILY MEAN
TO
Normal Normal Normal Normal
Peak Hour Daily Mean Peak Hour Daily Mean
2.4
5.0
Total
Hydrocarbon 2.1
3.2
5.8
2.2
1.3
2.1
1.7
1.8
2.4
1.8
TABLE 2-17
COMPARISON OF STAGNATION AND
NORMAL POLLUTANT LEVELS
OCTOBER 14 TO 24, 1963, INCIDENT
Cincinnati
RATIO OF CONCENTRATIONS
STAGNATION
PEAK HOUR
TO
Sulfur
Dioxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
Nitric
Oxide
Total
Hydrocarbon
Carbon
Monoxide
Uncorrected
Total Oxidant
Normal
Peak Hour
3.0
1.8
3.3
2.0
2.4
1.1
Normal
Dally Mean
6.4
2.5
6.3
2.6
3.4
3.3
STAGNATION
DAILY MEAN
TO
Normal
Peak Hour
0.5
1.1
1.7
1.2
1.5
0.3
Normal
Dally Mean
1.1
1.6
3.2
1.6
2.1
0.9
INCIDENTS OF HIGH POLLUTION
41
-------
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.15
- SULFUR DIOXIDE
O 0-10
§0.05
O
0.00
10
MEAN 0.078
MEAN 0.043
12 I 234 56 78 9IOIII2I 2 34 56 7891011 12
; NITROGEN DIOXIDE.
-^ V—' STAGNATION
-•-•w'-'-~- NORMAL
MEAN 0.065 ppm
MEAN 0.027 ppm
i i i i i i i i
12 I 234 56 78 9IOIM2I 2 34 56 7891011 12
TOTAL HYDROCARBON
- MEAN 6.9 ppm
MEAN 3.81 ppm
12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12
AM PM
HOUR OF DAY (EST)
Figure 2-26. Diurnal Patterns of Gaseous Pollutant Levels During
November - December 1962 Stagnation.
o.io
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.05
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
I MEAN 0.056 ppm
Q
< 0.00
CL
u 0.20
O
u
0.15
0.10
0.05
- ~-=~ ***~ x---!! £>'"MEAN~ o76~3~6 op"™" -
0.00
10
I 15
O
10
8 5
0.05
0.00
T—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—n—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—n—r~r
SULFUR DIOXIDE A £^( ,S STAGNATION
ctober
without stagnation)
MEAN 0.021 ppm
i i—I—I—I—I—L.
0.019 ppm ~ -
i i i i i—i i i i—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I
- TOTAL HYDROCARBON
MEAN 5.6 ppm
i i i i
i i i i i i i i
12 2 4 6 8 10
CARBON MONOXIDE
12 2 4 6
10 12
MEAN 10.6 ppm
MEAN 5.0 ppm
TOTAL OXIDANT
(Not corrected for SO2 Interference)
MEAN 0.012 ppi
12 24 6 8 10 12 2 4 6
AM PM
HOUR OF DAY (EST)
10 12
Figure 2-27. Diurnal Patterns of Gaseous Pollutant Levels During
October 1963 Stagnation.
42
INCIDENTS OF HIGH POLLUTION
GPO 821-653—4
-------
PART 3:
DATA TABLES
-------
PART 3: DATA TABLES
The results of the first 2 years of CAMP opera-
tions in Cincinnati are summarized in the following
tables. Although it is intended that this volume can
thus serve as a reference, the data are necessarily
condensed; more detailed compilations are avail-
able, including copies of the magnetic tape master
data files. Any interested person or group can
obtain this information by arrangement with the
Chief of the Air Quality Section, Laboratory of
Engineering and Physical Sciences, Division of
Air Pollution, at the Robert A. Taft Sanitary
Engineering Center.
GASEOUS POLLUTANTS
Table 3-1 lists and indexes those months for
which valid data are available, and for which
tables are included. Tables 3-2 through .3-126
present hourly average concentrations for each
pollutant by month. Values in these tables are
the arithmetic means of the 5-minute values in the
clock hour beginning at the time indicated. An
average is not calculated if the hour is considered
an invalid data hour, i.e., if fewer than seven 5-
minute values were valid. Similarly, if a calendar
day shows fewer than 13 valid hours, it is con-
sidered an invalid data day and the entire row
of averages for that day is deleted.
The reason for this procedure, which results in
the loss of a few valid hourly averages, is that
the data thus lost are usually concentrated at the
beginning or end of the day. Since pollutant con-
centrations show considerable diurnal variation, the
inclusion of data for such days would introduce
into any summary calculations a definite bias in
favor of the nocturnal hours.
The first summary line (titled MONTHLY
MEAN) represents the arithmetic mean of the hourly
averages, and hence represents the pattern of diurnal
variation for the month. Again by the same validity
criterion, this average is not calculated unless 16
or more hourly averages are present. The second
and third summary lines are the number of and
maximum of the hourly averages in the column.
These maxima must be used with care, since a
greater value may have been deleted as part of an
invalid day.
The first summary column (titled DAILY MEAN)
is the arithmetic mean* of the 13 or more hourly
averages comprising the row, and the second
summary column is the number of such valid
hourly averages. The third summary column.
however, is not the maximum hourly average for
the day, but the maximum 5-minute value included
in the hours, of valid data during the day. The
largest of these is not necessarily the maximum
for the month if any days or hours have been
deleted as invalid; the maximum 5-minute con-
centration during the month is best obtained from
the tables of frequency distributions, which are
compiled without considering the validity of any
hour or day.
Two summary figures appear in the lower right
corner. The first is the monthly average, an
arithmetic mean, and appears only if 16 or more
days were valid (a valid data month). The second
is the total number of valid hours during the
month, which offers some basis for judging the
representativeness of the monthly average. (A 31-
day month has 744 possible hours; a 30-day month,
720; and February, 672.)
SOILING INDEX
Tables 3-127 through 3-134 present soiling index
values at the CAMP station by month. Each value
was obtained from a 2-hour integrated sample
beginning at the time indicated in the column
heading. A missing value indicates that the sample
was not taken or was invalid because of instrument
malfunction.
The first summary line (titled MONTHLY
MEAN) represents the arithmetic mean of the 2-
hour average values in the column, and is cal-
culated only if 16 or more days are represented.
The first summary column (titled DAILY MEAN)
is the arithmetic mean of the 2-hour values for the
day; if fewer than seven such values are present,
the daily mean is not calculated, but the com-
ponent 2-hour values for the day are not deleted
from the table.
The other summary columns and rows are the
number of and maximum of the respective 2-hour
values. Three summary figures appear in the lower
right corner; the mean and maximum value for the
month are the upper left and lower right figures
respectively; the center figure is the total number
of values. (A 31-day month could have 372 such
values; a 30-day month, 360; and February, 336.)
Tables 3-127 through 3-134 are grouped follow-
ing the gaseous pollutant data tables and are
indexed in Table 3-1.
'Although mean values discussed in the text have been rounded to a precision consistent with the physical significance of
the numbers, some of the summary calculations in Tables 3-2 to 3-134 have been reported to the precision permitted by
the number of data used. All the summary calculations in the tables are performed before the hourly averages are
rounded.
DATA TABLES
45
-------
SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER
Tables 3-135 through 3-137 present the results
of analyses of 24-hour integrated particulate
samples. Table 3-135 presents the concentration of
suspended particulate matter; Table 3-136, the con-
centration of benzene-soluable organic particulate
matter; and Table 3-137, the gross beta radio-
activity of the particulate matter.
Each value represents a sample collected from
about noon to noon, ending on the date indicated,
with the exception of those indicated by asterisks;
values so marked represent samples integrated
over a 48-hour period, usually through a week-
end, and entered in the tables as identical values
for the 2 days. The summary rows are the
arithmetic means of the various values for the
month, including the duplicate pairs.
TABLE 3-1
INDEX TO DATA TABLES
Cincinnati, Ohio
1962
Sulfur
Dioxide
Nitric
Oxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
Total
Oxidant
Total
Hydrocarbon
Carbon
Monoxide
Soling
Index
Suspended
Particulates
Organic
Particulates
Beta
Radioactivity
Jan
3-2
3-26
3-50
3-74
a
b
a
Feb
3-3
3-27
3-51
3-75
a
b
a
Mar
3-4
3-28
3-52
3-76
a
b
a
Apr
3-5
3-29
3-53
3-77
b
b
a
May
3-6
3-30
3-54
3-78
3-98
b
a
June
3-7
3-31
3-55
3-79
3-99
b
a
July
3-8
3-32
3-56
3-80
3-100
b
a
Aug
3-9
3-33
3-57
3-81
b
b
a
Sept
3-10
3-34
3-58
3-82
3-101
b
a
Oct
3-11
3-35
3-59
3-83
3-102
b
a
Nov
3-12
3-36
3-60
3-84
3-103
b
a
Dec
3-13
3-37
3-61
3-85
3-104
b
a
a :
a
a
1963
Sulfur
Dioxide
Nitric
Oxide
Nitrogen
Dioxide
Total
Oxidant
Total
Hydrocarbon
Carbon
Monoxide
Soling
Index
Suspended
Particulates
Organic
Particulates
Beta
Radioactivity
Jau
3-14
3-38
3-62
3-86
3-105
b
3-127
Feb
3-15
3-39
3-63
3-87
3-106
b
3-128
Mar .
3-16
3-40
3-64
3-88
3-107
3-117
3-129
Apr
3-17
3-41
3-65
3-89
3-108
3-118
3-130
May
3-18
3-42
3-66
3-90
3-109
3-119
b
June
3-19
3-43
3-67
3-91
3-110
3-120
b
July
3-20
3-44
3-68
3-92
3-111
3-121
3-331
Aug
3-21
3-45
3-69
3-93
3-12
3-122
b
Sept
3-22
3-46
3-70
3-94
3-13
3-123
b
Oct
3-23
3-47
3-71
3-95
3-114
3-124
3-132
Nov
3-24
. 3-48
3-72
3-96
3-115
3-125
3-133
Dec
3-25
3^9
3-73
3-97
3-116
3-126
3-134
3-135
3-136
3-137
, Instrument not yet in operation
No valid data
46
DATA TABLES
-------
TABLE 32 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1962
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NOOftt
mum.
OF
NEEK
MON
TUE
WED
TMU
FBI
SAT
SUN
MflN
TUE
WED
FPI
SAT
SUN
MQN
WFD
THU
FRI
CAT
SUN
TUE
WfeD
THU
FPI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MEAN
MS
YMEAN
12
6
4
7
4
4
1
0
3
3
1
I
2
10
5
1
4)
5
3
1
1
4
25
10
1
5
6
9
4
4
1
3
7
2
9
1
5
13
5
1
5
6
4
2
1
5
25
13
5
5
9
3
7
1
2
5
3
13
1
8
11
-------
TABLE 3-3 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
97
28
•MTU
Ml. OH
OF
NEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WfD
TKJU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
T>|U
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TWE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SL/N
MQN
T1IF
WED
VMEAN
MVS
LYMEM
12
<«
a
14
<<
3
1
2
3
8
14
1
3
7
8
2
2
0
1
?
4
9
8
2
3
8
A
2
!
2
1
2
?
i*
10
8
3
6
1 1
4
2
1
I
2
2
2
3
10
11
4
3
10
1
1
1
1
3
2
3
10
10
A
5
4
12
8
1
1
1
3
3
3
10
12
H
<
7
13
8
2
2
3
3
3
^
3
10
13
7
10
18
7
3
0
2
3
5
5
10
18
1
4
19
5
3
1
2
2
4
7
5
10
19
9
2
12
7
2
1
2
2
5
8
12
18
2
18
6
3
5
2
2
4
8
18
11
9
6
3
4
1
3
2
7
9
12
8
4
2
2
3
3
8
8
1
5
3
1
1
5
5
8
5
2
6
8
3
1
1
4
4
9
8
3
6
8
4
1
3
1
8
8
4
3
6
3
1
0
0
2
I
10
8
r
5
8
6
ft
2
1
1
1
1
10
8
M
(
6
7
10
3
1
1
1
9
10
7
9
6
10
8
1
0
2
1
10
10
1
9
7
10
2
1
0
1
9
10
9
7
7
11
1
1
1
8
11
11
7
6
1
1
1
7
7
11
10
7
3
1
1
0
2
8
10
OM.Y
KM
5.9
9.4
6.8
2.2
1.4
1.3
2.1
2.6
3j
«'
3.7
NO.
OFM
21
24
22
21
17
23
24
21
21
21*
^JHM
MAX.
32
40
39
11
6
4
6
7
7
-------
TABLE 3-4 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1962
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHIY
morn
MAX. KB.
OF
•OK
THU
FRI
SON
MON
TUE
W(D
THU
FRI
SAT
SU.N
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WfD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MEAN
MS
YMEAN
12
2
3
5
1
1
3
3
6
3
1
3
5
3
6
4
9
8
3
4
21
9
1
2
3
6
1
1
1
1
2
3
7
3
1
3
5
4
5
4
4
2
3
3
23
7
2
2
4
6
I
1
1
1
2
3
5
4
I
3
6
3
5
5
6
4
3
3
23
6
3
2
5
5
1
1
1
1
3
4
5
4
I
3
5
3
4
3
8
2
2
3
23
8
4
2
4
5
1
1
1
1
3
4
5
4
1
2
4
3
4
4
9
2
3
3
23
9
A
5
3
4
4
1
1
1
1
3
4
2
4
2
2
5
3 '
4
4
6
2
3
3
23
6
M
(
3
5
5
1
1
1
1
4
4
18
5
2
3
5
2
5
a
5
2
4
4
23
18
7
3
5
6
1
1
1
1
3
6
4
6
2
3
5
3
7
11
8
3
5
4
23
11
1
4
5
5
1
1
1
1
3
6
4
5
3
3
6
4
8
13
14
3
6
5
?3
14
1
3
5
4
1
1
1
1
1
3
6
26
2
3
4
5
12
10
8
3
5
5
22
26
W
3
5
5
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
2
2
3
2
4
6
6
3
4
5
3
22
6
11
3
8
1
2
1
1
6
3
3
4
2
2
3
2
3
5
5
6
4
3
5
4
23
8
12
2
10
I
2
1
1
2
3
4
2
2
4
2
3
5
6
8
2
3
4
?
?2
10
1
2
7
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
2
3
1
3
5
4
10
2
2
3
3
24
10
2
3
6
1
1
1
1
4
2
2
3
1
1
3
3
1
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
24
6
3
2
5
1
1
0
4
2
1
2
1
4
3
3
2
3
3
8
2
3
3
3
23
8
4
2
5
1
1
0
3
3'
1
3
1
2
3
3
2
3
•
2
10
15
3
3
3
23
15
t
S
2
5
1
1
1
0
3
3
L
•3
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
12
11
£»
3
3
24
12
•
C
2
5
1
1
1
0
3
3
1
3
2
2
2
3
4
5
3
9
6
3
3
3
22
9
/
2
5
1
1
1
1
4
3
2
5
2
3
2
4
4
5
4
9
23
4
4
4
22
23
1
3
7
1
1
1
1
4
3
3
6
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
8
3
4
4
4
22
8
>
3
9
1
1
1
1
4
3
3
6
2
2
5
4
5
6
5
11
5
3
3
4
23
11
N .
3
8
1
2
1
1
3
2
3
3
2
3
S
4
5
'»
6
9
4
3
4
23
9
11
2
7
1
2
1
3
2
3
4
1
3
4
4
5
3
20
*19
5
2
5
22
20
ONLY
•EM
2.5
30
4 fl
5.6
3.0
1.1
1.1
0.8
1.0
2.5
2.8
3.2
5.7
3.0
1.9
2.1
3.1
3.7
3.5
4.5
4.8
8.0
r.7
3.3
3.5
3.6
M.
OF HI
24
94
7 1
24
22
21
24
14
14
21
24
24
23
14
14
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
546
54NN
MAX.
5
12
7
4
4
5
1
7
4
8
46
7
, 7
5
7
8
6
14
35
52
20
S
-------
TABLE 3-5 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
i
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
MWITm.YMCAN
NO. OF MYS
MAX. WILY MEAN
A M
12
3
2
2
3
0
1
5
4
1
14
2
1
4
2
2
2
2
3
1
4
3
2
3
4
3
2
6
3
28
14
1
4
3
3
3
1
4
3
1
2
19
2
2
•i
1
2
2
3
2
1
4
1
1
4
4
3
?
9
3
?1
19
2
'*
i
3
3
4
3
2
1
3
1^
2
1
5
1
3
Z
2
3
I
3
3
1
3
4
}
?
6
3
?H
10
3
3
4
6
?
1
1
3
10
3
1
5
1
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
3
3
27
10
4
4
5
4
6
2
?
1
0
4
10
3
0
4
1
2
2
3
4
2
3
2
1
2
3
?
2
3
27
10
s
5
4
4
4
5
2
1
0
5
9
4
0
4
2
3
3
4
2
2
3
2
I
2
5
3
2
3
27
9
f
5
6
R
7
5
3
1
1
15
12
6
2
4
2
4
5
7
3
3
4
2
1
5
12
4
3
0
5
28
15
7
•i
9
7
6
e;
5
1
2
14
10
4
1
3
2
3
6
5
2
3
5
1
2
9
10
7
3
1
5
2R
14
1
3
6
7
e
i
3
1
3
13
4
2
2
2
2
6
S
3
2
4
1
1
9
6
1 1
5
2
5
?8
5.3
9
3
4
6
5
2
2
1
6
8
3
2
3
2
6
3
6
2
3
1
6
3
13
1
2
4
25
13
M
4
2
5
?
1
1
2
9
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
1
1
3
2
5
3
3
25
9
11
2
3
3
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
2
5
4
2
2
2
4
2
2
4
1
I
3
3
25
7
r M
12
4
2
2
3
1
4
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
14
1
6
?
3
4
I
1
1
2
3
26
1*
1
4
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
3
2
7
1
4
1
2
3
2
1
1
3
2
27
7
2
3
2
1
2
1
1
1
3
2
1.
2
2
4
1
5
1
3
1
2
2
3
1
1
8
2
26
8
3
^
1
3
7
1
2
4
1
1
4
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
0
3
2
1
2
2
2
26
7
4
2
2
1
3
12
4
2
5
1
9
3
1
1
2
2
4
1
1
1
2
1
1
5
2
1
3
3
3
28
12
i
2
2
1
2
13
2
1
7
2
6
2
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
2
7
3
27
13
C
2
2
1
8
1
1
7
1
11
3
2
1
2
2
4
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
0
0
I
5
3
28
11
7
3
3
1
1
6
2
2
2
1
11
3
2
2
2
3
5
2
2
1
1
3
2
1
0
0
2
2
27
11
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
11
1
5
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
1
4
2
1
1
1
3
3
27
11
»
2
3
2
3
1
2
4
1
1
11
2
5
3
Z
4
4
3
1
2
I
5
2
2
1
1
6
3
27
11
M)
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
8
2
12
2
5
2
2
3
3
5
1
2
2
7
2
5
1
2
4
3
27
12
11
4
3
3
3
2
1
4
1
1
12
2
1
5
2
2
2
2
2
1
4
2
1
1
4
2
3
7
3
27
12
ONLY
MUM
3,5:
3.5,
3.1!
3.3
*.7
2.5
2.*
2.7
1.3
6.7
6 7
2.8
2.1
^.5
1.7
2.5
3.5
2.6
3.0
1.7
3.1
2.1
1.5
3.6
3.1
2.9
2.5
4.0
•0.
OF Ml
24
20
19
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
23
24
22
16
MM
MM.
9
6
12
11
24
18
6
19
11
20
23
9
10
7
3
8
10
7
23
5
14
12
5
12
16
20
10
23
3.0
647
-------
TABLE 3-6 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1962
DAY
NORTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
•0.(*Df
MX. Ml
OF
ma
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
M0N
TUE
WfD
THU
SAT
SUN
M0N
WfD
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
MpN I
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SfT
SUN
MPN
TUE
WED
THU
MEAN
tvs
rMEM
12
9
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
0
2
1
1
3
U
9
1
2
3
1
1
1
5
2
1
3
1
2
5
0
1
14
5
2
3
2
2
3
1
1
3
1
1
5
1
0
12
5
0
^
i
i
i
3
2
1
1
1
1
7
1
14
7
3
1
0
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
2
?
16
4
A
6
1
1
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
3
0
4
3
1
0
0
2
17
6
•
14
2
2
3
1
2
5
3
1
2
0
3
2
1
4
1
1
3
IB
14
4
3
2
5
2
2
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
2
4
6
1
4
3
19
6
6
2
2
8
5
4
2
1
3
5
2
3
3
6
10
1
2
4
18
10
0
0
3
12
3
1
6
1
3
3
1
3
5
8
1
3
2
3
18
12
•
0
5
1
1
0
2
1
3
1
1
3
8
8
1
5
1
3
18
8
11
0
2
0
0
1
0
4
1
3
0
1
4
6
3
4
3
2
16
6
n
i
i
i
i
i
i
2
1
4
2
3
3
1
13
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
1
14
3
4
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
3
1
14
4
0
1
1
1
1
a
i
0
i
3
1
8
12
8
0
1
1
6
2
5
7
7
7
P
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
7
9
7
•
3
2
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
11
6
0
12
11
1
4
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
6
0
14
6
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
2
1
2
0
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
18
2
1
4
1
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
16
4
•
2
2
1
0
1
1
3
0
1
1
2
1
0
14
3
11
2
0
0
1
3
1
4
o
0
2
1
1
0
• 0
14
4
•MY
WM
3.1
1.4
1.6
2.4
1.2
1.5
2.2
1.1
2.6
2.8
1.1
1.4
2.8
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.8
1.2
m
mm
18
19
21
18
14
17
15
22
24
24
15
18
16
16
19
24
18
20
13
351
»M
ML
29
8
6
18
11
7
6
20
3
26
9
7
6
30
11
17
30
24
8
-------
TABLE 3-7 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI. JUNE 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MMINL'
»0. OfD
MAX HM
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MEM
AYS
YMEAN
12
1
1
I
I
0
1
4
1
0
1
1
I
12
4
1
3
1
0
1
3
1
0
1
0
1
10
3
2
1
2
I
0
1
2
0
I
1
1
a
l
12
3
i
i
0
0
2
1
1
0
2
1
1
11
?
4
1
1
0
I
0
1
4
1
1
0
2
0
1
13
A
5
1
2
1
1
0
1
3
1
0
1
1
1
0
13
M
(
1
• 2
3
3
1
0
5
1
1
1
2
5
3
13
5
7
1
1
3
5
3
1
3
8
1
3
2
1
2
1
3
9
*
3
17
1
9
2
2
3
2
1
11
15
1
3
6
2
2
1
2
12
2
H
17
1 C
9
8
2
1
2
1
12
1
2
B
6
6
1
2
3
2
15
1 j
10
1
1
2
0
1
3
1
2
5
14
1
2
1
1
14
11
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
8
I
1
4
4
15
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
2
3
2
15
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
2
7
2
1
1
1
2
16
2
4
I
1
1-
1
2
1
4
0
2
1
1
1
13
A
3
4
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
14
4
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
2
13
7
P
5
<+
1
0
1
1
0
0
3
1
2
1
3
12
M
(
2 !
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
0
5
2
13
7
2 i
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
<.
1
0
0
3
14
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
2
u
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
3
1
2
1
15
M)
'
6 1
1
2
0
1
0
1
5
0
1
2
3
1
1
1
19
11
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
I
2
1
13
2.
•MIT
mm
3.4
1.1
1.*
1.2
1.3
0.9
1.7
2.0
1.3
1.5
2.1
3.3
1.6
1.1
1.2
3.0
1.6
•>.
OF«
14
17
24
22
15
16
19
23
19
24
20
15
20
21
18
20
22
329
urn
MM.
25
6
6
6
5
7
20
19
17
9
12
33
12
5
9
32
6
-------
TABLE 3-8 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI. JULY 1962
DAY
HORN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 .
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
HONTM.V
NO Of D
MAX. MR
OF
•EH
SUN
MON
TUE
WtD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WtD
THU
Rtl
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FBI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WID
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MEAN
UTS
THAN
12
1
0
3
0
1
3
1
1
8
3
1
1
0
2
1
0
3
1
1
1
g
3
2
1
0
1
1
1
I
3
1
1
1
10
3
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
4
1
2
1
1
3
1
4
1
2
9
4
A
S
1
5
i
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
10
5
•
•
1
2
0
2
1
4
1
3
2
1
10
4
7
1
1
3
5
3
1
4
2
3
3
9
11
9
•
2
1
2
3
1
1
5
2
3
8
10
9
»
2
1
2
3
11
1
1
2
1
8
10
11
H
2
12
5
5
3
1
1
1
1
4
10
12
11
0
5
3
2
17
0
1
1
4
3
2
11
17
B
1
2
4
4
1
1
1
9
3
2
10
9
1
0
s
0
1
1
3
4
3
3
9
5
2
1
1
1
2
5
2
2
8
5
2
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
9
3
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
7
2
r
2
0
0
5
1
1
1
7
5
•
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
8
1
0
0
1
1
0
4
1
1
8
4
0
0
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
9
3
3
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
11
3
•
0
3
2
1
0
1
1
2
1
9
3
11
0
4
1
0
1
4
1
1
3
9
4
OM.T
mm
i.*
1.6
1.8
2.*
2.9
0.8
1.4
1.7
2.5
1.5
2.4
NO.
OTNt
13
18
19
16
16
23
23
24
24
21
24
221
MM
ML
10
33
11
17
37
3
9^
13
16
6
25
-------
TABLE 3-9 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 1962
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
HO. Of Hi
MAX.HRL
OF
WEEK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MQN
TUE
WSD
THU
FRI
SAT
SU.N
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
mo
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
MEAN
IYS
YMEAN
12
1
1
I
2
1
5
2
1
1
2
1
11
5
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
4
2
1
1
2
1
12
4
2
0
0
2
1
2
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
12
4
3
2
\
0
2
1
1
I
3
2
I
2
0
1
13
3
4
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
I
0
1
12
2
A
5
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
12
2
M
C
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
12
3
;
7
1
4
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
1
7
12
7
1
4
1
10
3
2
2
2
5
8
2
B
11
10
»
1
6
6
1
7
2
1
2
6
6
18
1
12
18
W
4
7
2
0
6
1
2
3
2
2
3
9
7
13
9
11
9
2
0
2
7
2
1
1
4
4
3
11
9
12
22
1
2
2
1
4
4
1
0
1
3
3
12
22
1
11
2
I
2
3
6
2
1
0
3
10
11
8
1
1
0
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
12
8
1
1
3
3
Z
5
1
1
1
3
10
5
0
1
1
1
1
3
3
0
2
1
10
3
P
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
0
17
12
17
•
1
2
1
2
1
2
5
2
0
1
2
1
12
5
1
2
0
2
1
2
1
5
1
1
1
2
1
2
14
5
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
2
1
13
4
1
2
0
1
2
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
12
3
M
1
1
0
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
5
13
5
11
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
4
2
1
2
. 1
1
2
1*
4
OM.Y
KM
4.0
l.B
1.2
1.7
0.8
2.4
1.6
2.6
2.6
1.4
1.4
2.2
2.4
3.5
NO.
OFM
16
18
18
21
13
22
23
22
24
23
24
19
23
21
287
S4MN
MAX.
^
34
23
16
8
5
11
11
17
11
4
7
16
45
37
-------
TABLE 3-10 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MMTNU
M.OFB
MM.HM
OF
WEEK
SAT
SUN
M0N
TME
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
S^N
MON
TUE
WED
TMU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
mm
ITS
YMEM
12
1
2
0
2
1
0
6
1
3
2
2
6
2
1
1
1
2
2
18
6
1
1
3
1
0
2
2
1
4
1
3
2
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
18
4
2
2
4
1
1
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
3
1
1
2
2
17
4
3
1
1
14
2
0
4
4
o
1
3
2
3
1
3
1
0
1
1
2
18
14
4
0
1
12
2
0
8
5
1
4
2
3
1
4
1
1
2
1
3
18
12
A
S
1
1
17
1
2
0
6
4
1
3
3
2
1
4
1
1
1
2
3
19
17
H
(
4
1
8
0
2
2
4
3
2
3
3
2
1
4
2
1
2
1
3
19
8
7
5
2
3
1
2
4
3
2
3
3
3
5
2
6
2
2
2
2
3
19
6
1
5
2
4
2
2
2
3
11
6
3
1
5
2
2
3
3
3
17
11
»
4
5
3
3
1
1
1
9
4
3
1
5
2
2
2
3
3
17
9
11
7
6
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
12
1
3
1
2
1
3
3
18
12
11
3
4
1
0
1
1
4
1
3
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
-18
4
12
1
2
2
2
0
0
4
1
2
1
1
0
2
2
1
0
3
1
18
4
1
11
0
1
1
6
2
2
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
1
2
16
11
2
3
7
1
0
1
0
2
i
4
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
18
7
3
5
7
3
1
0
0
0
1
4
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
2
19
7
4
9
1
0
0
0
2
i
6
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
17
9
P
S
5
1
0
1
0
1
I
3
1
1
3
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
17
5
II
(
6:
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
I
17
6
7
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
3
1
1
5
2
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
18
5
I
i;
4;
5
• 2
6
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
19
6
»
1
5
1
1
1
1
I
1
2
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
19
5
11
1
3
0
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
2
2
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
19
4
ONLY
•EM
3.0
3.5
5.5
1.3
1.1
1.*
1.0
1.8
2.6
7 S
2.8
2.4
1.8
2.5
1.1
2.3
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.7
2.0
•0.
9m
22
17
15
17
13
20
21
22
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
22
24
24
*•
MM.
17
28
43
6
12
9
7
18
14
7
18
11
4
21
10
7
3
4
6
9
-------
TABLE 3-11
HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI. OCTOBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
imrruj v
•oof n
MAX ML
OF
NEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
•SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
F[?l
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
Fpl
SAT
MON
TUE
WED
THU
•FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TlJE
WED
tuui
WS
YMEAN
12
2
0
3
0
1
I
1
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
7
7
7
9
,
8
8
1
5
3
B
3
2
3
3
28
9
1
2
1
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
8
7
6
10
9
8
1
4
7
7
1
2
3
27
10
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
7
9
7
6
9
5
8
9
1
0
6
H
f,
2
23
-7
3
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
10
7
6
9
10
9
1
3
5
7
4
2
27
If)
4
2
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
7
8
6
9
9
9
2
2
5
6
4
2
3
3
30
9
A
5
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
0
3
5
2
3
2
4
5
7
9
7
9
9
9
2
7
2
5
5
0
3
30
9
M
C
2
1
1
1
2
1
0
3
1
4
5
3
3
1
2
18
9
13
3
10
11
10
2
o
3
9
6
5
5
29
18
7
3
1
2
2
3
0
0
2
1
3
6
3
2
1
3
15
8
13
10
9
14
12
2
10
3
7
7
2
5
30
15
1
6
1
1
4
4
2
0
1
1
4
5
4
2
2
7
10
12
12
9
15
10
<:
5
3
8
1
6
15
I
1
1
21
10
2
1
1
1
4
5
3
.2
2
10
3
9
12
13
13
9
1
2
2
6
2
5
27
21
N
1
6
6
3
1
1
6
4
3
3
1
4
3
11
10
14
11
13
3
1
2
2
6
5
25
14
11
3
1
2
2
1
4
1
5
3
3
3
1
2
2
7
8
8
7
7
2
2
5
4
24
8
12
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
7
3
3
5
1
6
1
7
7
7
6
9
2
8
3
23
•5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
2
3
7
2
3
4
7
1?
7
9
2
1
6
8
4
3
24
13
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
6
2
3
6
2
4
4
7
7
14
6
8
1
4
5
b
4
25
14
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
8
8
14
7
8
1
1
2
3
3
3
27
14
2
3
1
1
3
0
1
1
3
4
2
2
3
1
12
4
8
8
14
6
8
2
1
3
3
26
14
P
1
1
1
1
2
5
4
2
2
3
1
19
3
8
7
•8
6
8
1
1
2
2
6
1
3
3
27
19
M
1
0
0
2
0
2
1
3
3
3
2
2
1
15
5
8
6
8
6
9
1
1
1
3
10
4
3
3
29
15
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
8
2
2
1
2
5
9
6
8
6
9
2
2
1
3
14
7
3
3
30
14
1
0
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
7
2
3
1
2
6
8
7
8
6
9
2
2
1
3
15
5
3
3
30
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
8
2
6
1
2
6
8
8
8
7
8
9
1
3
2
3
7
5
3
4
29
9
It
1
0
1
1
1
3
1
4
2
3
2
4
1
2
6
9
8
10
7
7
1
3
3
7
2
4
3
4
29
10
11
1
4
0
1
2
1
4
2
2
2
3
2
11
7
9
8
10
7
7
5
3
8
2
• 3
2
3
27
11
OM.Y
mm
1.8
1.0
1.2
2.3
1.9
1.4
1.0
1.2
1.8
3.7
3.7
2.5
3.1
1.5
5.0
5.1
8.1
8.3
7.9
9.2
5.0
1.8
3.9
3.7
7.0
4.2
2.6
3.4
NO.
«Mt
22
23
23
24
24
19
18
17
17
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
23
24
24
23
22
21
18
20
22
19
17
24
659
S-MMI
HAL
8
6
7
33
15
8
6
5
18
24
14
6
9
6
35
20
21
17
29
21
1O
18
14
12
20
10
22
14
8
7
-------
TABLE 3-12 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1962
DAY
tarn
i
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MMIM.I
•O.OFD
MM. HM
OF
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
MON
WED
THU
Ff»l
SfT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
IHU
$!,
SUN
MQN
TUE
WtD
THU
FPI
mum
*YS
YMEM
12
3
4
3
2
2
5
1
i
2
2
4
4
4
1
2
1
0
1
2
4
0
2
6
3
11
7
a
30
11
1
4
3
3
2
3
4
1
2
2
2
5
3
5
1
2
1
1
1
2
0
3
^
3
11
8
29
11
2
i»
3
3
3
3
4
2
2
2
3
6
3
4
1
3
1
0
2
1
1
4
5
3
10
8
29
10
3
3
7
2
3
2
<)
2
2
2
3
5
4
4
1
3
I
0
1
1
1
4
a
3
9
i y
9
29
•12
4
2
4
2
3
4
12
3
2
3
4
7
3
3
1
3
1
0
0
2
0
4
10
3
8
9
29
12
A
5
3
8
3
3
5
9
3
2
4
5
7
3
2
1
3
1
1
0
1
2
1
4
9
4
8
i i
9
30
11
H
(
4
8
2
4
10
1 ?
12
3
3
3
5
13
6
3
2
3
2
3
2
1
4
2
4
11
9
10
i n
11
30
13
7
5
4
4
4
9
10
3
2
3
6
13
9
4
4
1
2
4
1
1
10
2
6
H
12
11
12
30
13
1
5
2
6
5
12
10
3
2
3
6
11
5
5
3
2
&
1
2
1
13
2
8
5
9
1.1
£
12
30
13
9
5
2
7
4
13
8
3
2
5
5
12
4
7
0
1
2
12
2
1
20
4
6
6
6
f
16
6
29
20
11
6
3
7
5
7
5
7
4
2
5
5
11
3
7
0
1
5
5
1
0
14
4
7
5
4
17
5
29
17
11
3
2
4
5
5
5
6
3
2
10
6
9
3
6
1
1
8
6
1
1
4
3
6
3
4
4
15
5
30
15
12
2
3
15
12
3
2
11
5
5
4
3
1
2
3
11
0
1
4
2
4
2
3
4
3
29
15
1
2
2
5
10
3
3
2
4
4
4
5
3
1
2
1
17
1
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
30
17
2
3
4
5
4
3
2
3
3
5
4
0
2
1
8
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
29
8
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
2
4
2
5
3
1
2
1
11
4
0
6
1
2
2
2
2
1
30
11
3
5
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
1
2
1
23
7
1
2
1
2
1
3
2
1
30
23
P
4
4
6
4
4
3
2
2
4
3
3
5
1
1
2
1
16
8
0
27
1
3
3
4
4
2
30
27
•
4
4
5
3
4
2
2
2
4
3
5
5
2
1
2
1
3
6
1
39
2
3
6
6
4
5
5
30
39
7
4
3
3
4
1
2
3
2
3
3
6
1
2
3
1
2
5
1
2
3
3
8
6
6
5
30
a
i
4
3
3
3
12
1
2
4
1
3
4
4
1
2
2
1
2
b
1
1
2
4
6
5
5
4
3
30
12
»
5 .
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
4
4
3
2
1
4
2
.9
3
2
1
1
6
4
8
4
3
3
30
9
•
5
3
3
3
2
3
2
1
3
3
3
1
1
2
1
7
2
3
2
1
5
3
8
4
6
30
8
11
5
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
4
3
4
1
2
1
0
10
2
4
2
2
4
3
8
5
7
30
10
MIT
•M
3,6
3.6
**»o
3.5
3.6
5.7
.5
5.5
2.6
2.2
3.3
3.9
6.0
4.2
3.2
1.2
2.1
1.6
7.5
2.3
1.1
6.9
1.7
*•*.
5.2
5.1
6.2
57
• '
7.2
. *
».
«•
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
20
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24.
74
24
7l2
MB
ML
7
10
12
6
31
32
5
4
17
7
17
11
12
5
8
12
49
12
6
68
5
10
13
16
15
1 4
19
-------
TABLE 3-13 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
27
28
29
30
31
MEEK
SAT
SUN
M0N
TUE
wpo
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN,
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WfD
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
TUE
wrn
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX HRIY MEAN
AM-.
12
5
6
5
3
1
0
2
0
2
3
3
4
3
h
6
3
6
a
4
H
3
3
6
3
4
1
3
. H
31
I'l
1
5
5
9
3
1
1
2
1
3
2
3
, 3
3
6
5
3
6
10
b
1 1
3
3
6
3
3
1
3
- 4
.31
ir
2
8
4
' .6
. 3
, 0
1
. 2
1
3
3
3
: 2
3
5
5
10
6
9
fi
7
3
4
6
5
4
1
2
. 4
31
1C
3
a
3
7
3
1
1
1
1
<«
3
2
3
5
7
7
7
5
<5
6
6
4
7
6
6
3
3
3
4
?1
9"
4
6
4
11
3
1
I
1
I
4
3
2
3
6
B
6
6
6
9
i
6
8
4
8
10
7
4
3
2
5
31
11
5 "
10
5
12
4
1
1
1
2
3
3
2
3
6
7
6
4
7
7
•a
7
6
3
9
9
6
6
3
2
. 5
31 .
12
6
10
4
9
5
1
2
2
4
2
5
3
4
6
7
7
6
7
8
7
5
2
10
11
9
7
3
2
' 5.
31
11'
7
12
4
9
6
3
2
2
3
1
4
3
C,
7
6
fc
P
12
7
9
Q
3
11
13
8
6
3
•2
6
31
13
1
13
9
21
7
4
2
3
2
2
3
4
b
9
7
8
3
13
5
10
7
6
13
12
• 10
6
3
2
7
31
21
»
11
8
22
11
3
2
2
2
6
4
5
.6
6
8
14
5
9
9
4
9
11
13
8
4
7
27
22
11
14
9
25
14
3
2
2
2
3
5
4
8
14
5
7
9
3
7
9
14
7
5
. 7
25
25
11
17
12
29
17
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
17
5
4
8
14
5
8
9
3
5
7
6
4
4
3
• 7
30
29
• . ' - '.• .r *.•'•••
u
18
17
20
22
2
3
2
2
?
2
3
4
11
5
5
7
11
5
7
6
4
1
5
5
6
2
3
2
6
: 31
22
1
20
18
10
6
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
4
14
4
7
4
8
5
6
7
4
9
5
5
5
2
3
2
6
•31
20
2
16
15
19
1
1
2
1
2
3
2
3
4
9
5
3
7
10
9
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
2
4
10
4
7 6
6
4
6
6
4
5
6
4
3
3
1
5
31
19
10
7
4
5
6
3
5
5
4
3
3
1
4
31
10
4
7
9
7
5
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
4
5
4
9
10
6
3
:»
6
6
3
5
7
4
3
3
1
4
31
10
*
9
9
6
4
2
' 2
. 2
1
3
1
2
5
5
5
7
12
6
8
6
4
3
5
8
4
2
3
1
-. 4
31
12
i
9
11
9
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
4
6
6
: 9
12
7
7
6
7
3
3
5
7
6
1
3
3
5
31
12
7
9
9
7
2
2
4
2
2
1
2
2
3
6
6
11
12
8
5
7
3
3
4
4
6
1
3
2
5
31
12
1
10
7
7
5
1
4
2
3
, 1
2
3
4
5
7
1 7
: 9
7
6
5
7
3
4
2
5
2
4
2
5
31
10
9
8
7
6
5
2
3
2
: 6
l
2
3
10
5
6
7
9
7
9
4
5
4
4
5
5
2
4
3
5
31
10
11
7
5
5
1
1
3
2
3
1
2
3
10
5
5
a
10
7
9
5
4
4
5
5
5
1
6
2
5
31
10
11
6
5
3
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
4
4
7
6
7
7
7
9
9
3
5
4
4
3
. 2
6
1
.4 ...
31
9
DALY
HUN
10.1
8.1
11.3
5.5
1.5.
2.1
1.7
2.1
2.2
2.6
2.8
*.4
6.8
6.0
6.8
7.6
8.2
6.7
•a a
6.5
6.6
3.6
• f
6.0
H» '
7.1
6.2
3.5
3.2
2.1
NO.
OFM
24
24
24
24
21
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
23
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
.22
5-HMM
MAX
28
23
33
52
13
12
4
7
5-
12
5
12
28
11
16
15
17
12
13
20
8
19
16
20
21
10
8
•8
5.2
733
-------
TABLE 3-14 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI. JANUARY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO Of Of
MM. Ml
OF
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MEAN
ITS
VMEAN
12
1
2
5
10
3
6
2
y
3
14
1
2
1
2
2
9
5
3
1
2
y
it
<3
8
3
9
10
it
4
31
U
1
2
3
6
4
2
5
1
1
12
2
1
1
4
4
8
5
4
0
6
t
6
6
6
7
6
5
4
4
31
12
2
2
3
11
4
2
6
2
2
19
1
3
2
5
2
8
6
2
1
7
6
6
5
7
7
9
3
5
31
19
3
1
4
14
3
2
5
2
3
28
2
3
1
5
3
7
8
2
2
3
i
6
5
4
7
8
7
3
5
31
28
4
1
4
10
6
3
5
1
5
29
1
2
1
4
3
5
5
5
2
3
6
6
5
4
7
8
10
3
5
31
29
A
i
I
6
a
B
4
6
1
4
31
3
1
1
5
3
5
5
1
3
7
8
10
12
8
9
9
6
6
31
31
M
(
2
20
11
14
3
7
2
10
34
5
2
1
6
3
6
i n
6
2
2
3
a
12
11
8
11
9
7
9
8
31
34
7
4
26
13
16
5
7
3
22
16
5
1
1
10
4
6
13
3
3
3
13
6
3
11
11
4
12
8
31
26
1
6
13
13
18
7
6
5
20
8
4
1
1
4
3
8
17
2
8
4
16
4
2
11
12
5
16
8
31
20
1
5
13
13
15
9
7
8
6
4
2
3
4
4
12
10
3
11
4
18
5
4
14
13
6
16
R
30
18
N
7
15
10
22
7
7
4
4
2
1
3
5
9
Z3
9
3
5
18
5
4
9
7
12
8
?7
23
11
10
12
14
17
7
7
4
4
5
3
1
2
2
3
12
5
2
3
15
5
3
6
8
8
28
48
a
8
3
6
9
6
8
3
15
5
1
2
3
2
9
19
5
8
2
2
4
6
7
3
10
5
14
6
?B
19
9
4
7
9
6
5
3
2
7
5
1
1
3
7
7
10
2
2
3
5
2
9
8
6
8
5
30
10
5
4
7
6
8
5
2
2
9
5
0
1
2
6
5
7
2
2
4
3
2
7
11
6
12
5
30
12
2
16,
2;
4
8
8
3
2
5
5
1
1
2
8
i
2
6
1
2
4
2
6
6
3
1
5
7
6
9
4
31
16
2
10
5
3
8
6
3
4
3
4
1
5
3
9
3
1
4
1
3
5
6
3
3
1
6
. 4
5
7
4
31
10
P
3
7
7
3
8
5
4
15
3
3
I
5
4
7
4
2
4
1
6
4
2
4
5
2
3
4
4
7
5
31
21
M
5
7
8
3
a
3
4
4
2
6
3
3
23
3
6
5
4
3
1
3
3
3
5
4
8
3
17
4
5
4
(,
31
23
5
7
8
3
9
4
4
2
1
6
3
2
22
1
7
5
4
3
2
4
4
2
5
10
3
5
4
5
3
5
31
22
3
8
7
4
9
4
5
4
4
2
4
3
4
4
5
3
5
8
3
1
6
5
2
3
11
9
4
5
3
7
3
5
31
11
3
10
7
3
8
3
6
3
2
3
?
4
4
6
3
4
4
2
1
5
6
5
3
2
7
5
4
5
7
2
4
31
10
M)
3
9
10
3
7
3
4
3
2
2
?
?
3
5
10
6
6
6
1
4
3
7
6
7
5
5
5
6
3
5
31
10
11
2
10
8
3
6
2
2
20
1
2
1
2
3
7
4
5
6
1
3
3
5
4
6
5
5
10
5
3
5
31
20
DMLY
MOM
3.8
8.9
8.7
7.9
6.0
5.^
2.9
4.4
6.*
10.8
3.4
1.7
2.0
5.5
*.5
6.*
9.2
6.8
5.4
1.9
3.4
*.*
.6
4. 1
7.9
6.1
4.0
7.4
7.6
6.3
7.0
5.6
NO.
OF Ml
24
2*
24
24
24
24
22
23
24
24
24
24.
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
21
24
21
23
24
24
731
MMN
MM.
14
65
26
33
14
13
10
37
41
43
8
7
6
39
11
24
68
24
11
6
14
13
9
10
44
16
15
30
18
14
20
-------
TABLE 3-15 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI. FEBRUARY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MONTH
«0. Of 1
MAX. Ml
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TME
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MDN
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
YMEAH
MYS
LYMEAN
12
2
3
1
11
6
8
4
4
4
9
2
4
6"
1
7
5
2
5
1
2
2
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
28
11
1
2
3
1
10
8
6
4
2
4
6
2
4
5
2
1
9
4
7
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
5
4
4
28
10
2
3
4
0
6
6
8
4
2
8
2
4
5
2
1
9
4
4
6
4
3
8
6
2
3
3
5
5
4
2fi
9
3
4
2
0
6
8
10
4
2
4
5
3
4
11
2
1
7
5
4
7
1
4
6
23
2
3
4
4
6
5
28
23
4
6
0
7
7
8
5
3
5
13
2
3
1
1
2
7
6
8
1
5
5
23
1
4
5
5
4
5
28
23
A
5
7
8
1
6
6
8
4
2
5
6
5
4
1
1
4
7
12
14
9
4
4
5
17
1
5
6
4
5
6
28
17
M
(
7
4
2
6
8
7
5
2
5
5
7
5
2
3
4
6
15
11
11
2
3
6
13
1
6
8
7
5
6
28
15
7
7
2
2
7
10
9
5
3
5
6
7
6
3
3
4
5
12
11
10
2
4
5
9
1
5
8
9
8
6
28
12
1
7
3
2
7
12
10
5
3
6
5
6
7
4
2
6
6
10
10
14
3
4
4
8
3
8
10
7
11
6
28
14
9
9
2
2
6
18
16
5
2
8
4
6
7
2
6
6
15
8
2
3
4
6
3
6
5
9
6
25
18
10
13
2
6
14
19
6
2
13
5
5
4
1
5
4
9
7
4
3
3
8
5
3
6
15
7
25
19
11
10
2
2
12
17
6
1
8
7
5
5
1
5
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
7
4
8
3
2
12
6
26
17
12
6
2
1
13
5
6
1
6
6
7
3
5
1
3
16
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
5
5
2
3
11
5
27
16
1
4
2
11
11
3
5
1
4
5
2
4
2
2
12
3
5
2
3
4
3
8
3
3
2
2
7
4
2P
12
2
4
2
2
12
8
3
5
2
4
2
5
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
7
4
3
2
4
6
4
28
12
3
5
2
2
6
4
4
2
5
3
4
3
2
1
3
2
2
5
6
1
3
4
4
5
3
3
3
6
3
28
6
4
5
2
3
4
2
6
3
1
5
4
4
2
3
1
1
3
2
8
4
1
3
4
5
2
3
2
8
3
28
8
r
s
5
2
2
4
3
3
4
6
3
5
2
4
1
2
4
2
2
1
1
3
5
9
2
3
2
3
6
3
28
9
M
C
5
2
2
6
5
3
4
2
8
3
5
2
2
1
2
3
3
3
3
1
2
5
8
1
3
2
4
6
3
28
8
7
5
2
2
10
6
5
4
2
9
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
1
2
4
9
2
2
2
2
3
4
28
10
1
5
2
3
10
8
5
5
3
9
2
7
2
4
2
2
3
4
5
3
1
2
4
8
3
2
3
7
3
4
28
10
9
4
2
2
6
7
5
6
3
7
2
5
3
4
2
3
4
5
7
3
1
2
3
5
2
2
3
5
3
4
28
7
10
5
1
7
9
7
5
6
3
9
4
4
3
a
2
4
4
3
14
3
1
2
3
15
3
2
4
2
3
5
28
15
11
3
1
8
8
7
5
5
3
9
3
4
5
4
1
5
4
2
5
3
2
2
3
20
3
2
4
4
3
5
28
20
OALV
MEAN
5.4
2.7
2.2
7.4
8.1
7.4
4.8
2.2
6.3
4.8
4.4
3.7
4.2
1.8
3."
5.7
5.5
6.2
5.5
2.0
2.9
4.1
9.6
2.8
3.6
3.9
4.4
6.4
4.7
NO.
OFHR
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
663
S4NN
MAX.
13
14
11
17
25
24
10
4
18
18
17
10
18
9
8
32
30
28
14
6
9
8
30
9
12
10
13
18
-------
TABLE 3 16 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
ma
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
FRI
CAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MONTHIY MEAN
HO. OF DAYS
MAX. WHY MEAN
12
2
4
7
5
3
0
1
1
4
0
0
0
26
3
3
1
2
1
0
0
1
3
1
1
4
0
1
0
1
1
3
31
26
1
2
4
5
3
3
1
3
2
4
0
0
1
13
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
8
0
0
1
0
2
2
31
13
2
2
3
5
3
3
1
2
1
5
0
0
0
1
y
3
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
2
0
6
0
0
1
1
0
2
31
6
3
2
2
6
7
3
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
1
3
0
1
2
3
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
31
7
4
2
2
5
7
3
0
2
1
3
0
1
0
3
•)
Z
0
1
3
0
0
2
4
3
3
0
1
0
3
0
1
2
31
7
A
S
3
2
5
7
2
0
0
3
3
0
3
0
3
3
2
1
1
2
0
0
1
3
5
1
1
1
2
2
0
2
2
31
7
M
C
5
2
5
10
2
1
1
3
2
1
8
3
3
4
3
0
2
3
0
1
2
4
9
3
2
1
5
4
1
1
3
31
10
/
5
4
4
7
5
2
1
6
2
1
13
6
3
2
0
3
7
1
3
3
5
10
2
1
7
7
5
1
0
4
31
13
1
6
5
8
9
5
1
2
5
1
1
11
10
1
2
1
4
4
2
2
2
6
8
2
0
4
7
4
1
1
4
31
1 1
f
6
8
9
2
1
3
4
3
1
8
0
2
2
4
3
1
2
r
5
2
1
0
2
3
3
1
1
3
29
9
M
5
10
8
3
1
2
3
2
0
8
1
3
3
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
0
0
2
2
11
6
2
3
28
11
11
4
10
5
4
9
2
2
2
4
0
7
3
1
3
0
2
1
2
1
3
1
0
0
1
2
6
2
1
3
30
10
D
4
9
4
3
10
1
2
1
9
0
4
1
1
2
3
0
5
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
4
0
6
2
1
3
30
10
1
6
7
4
2
5
1
1
3
4
0
4
1
2
1
3
0
6
1
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
2
30
7
7
6
3
2
2
1
2
1
2
0
4
1
2
4
3
0
3
0
2
1
2
0
7
0
1
2
5
2
1
2
30
7
8
5
4
2
2
1
0
1
2
0
2
2
3
3
3
0
6
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
5
0
2
31
8
7
3
4
4
1
1
0
2
2
0
1
6
2
3
2
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
4
?
31
7
P
9
3
3
9
2
0
2
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
2
b
i
0
i
i
0
0
1
9
0
1
0
1
3
4
2
31
9
M
9
2
2
3
1
0
2
1
2
0
3
1
3
3
4
2
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
11
6
1
0
1
2
1
2
30
11
10
4
3
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
I
0
2
9
2
6
2
19
2
1
3
30
19
10 '
3
5
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
?
4
3
3
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
4
1
18
3
0
2
31
18
8
3
4
4
3
4
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
6
1
0
0
Jl
14
2
0
3
31
14
M
6
4
4
7
3
1
6
3
1
1
2
1
2
3
10
1
1
1
0
0
1
?
1
9
3
0
1
1
2
0
1
3
31
10
11
5
6
4
8
2
0
1
4
0
0
1
0
2
4
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
2
2
7
0
10
2
•0 .
0
1
2
31
10
OAHY
mm
5.6
4.7
4.7
5.0
3.2
0.9
1.7
2.1
2.8
0.6
3.3
2.5
3.5
3.4
3.0
3.2
0.5
2.0
1.8
0.6
1.2
1.2
2.3
3.6
2.1
1.1
2.0
1.6
4.B
1.6-
1.0
•0.
Of Ml
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
CMMI
MM.
11
12
11
14
14
5
10
8
19
5
20
15
43
6
19
9
7
7
9
4
3
4
9
18
16
15
19
8
26
13
5
2.5
733
-------
TABLE 3-17 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
OF
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
T^U
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
lUt
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TPE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY KM
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. MH.Y MEAN
12
0
o
1
1
2
1
3
I
0
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
3
0
0
1
29
4
1
1
2
2
1
4
1
3
1
0
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
11
0
2
0
0
1
2
1
3
0
0
2
29
11
2
1
H
2
1
5
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
12
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
0
2
29
12
3
2
5
2
0
7
3
2
1
4
2
2
2
3
0
1
0
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
3
3
0
0
2
29
7
2
6
3
0
7
5
4
1
5
2
2
4
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
2
29
7
A
2
8
2
1
6
4
4
1
4
2
4
6
2
1
1
3
3
12
3
1
0
0
1
2
2
3
0
0
3
29
12
M
4
4
11 9
5
1
8
2
7
3
5
2
5
8
2
1
1
3
3
6
1
2
0
0
3
2
2
6
•0
0
3
29
11
4
1
6
6
5
5
3
2
5
9
1
?
4
2
1
14
0
1
0
0
3
3
4
8
1
0
4
29
14
6
12
3
1
3
6
5
5
3
2
4
8
1
1
8
2
1
8
0
1
1
0
2
2
22
5
2
1
4
29
22
7
2
1
2
3
4
3
3
2
3
8
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
9
1
3
3
3
26
9
U
3
1
1
2
1
5
2
3
1
3
7
1
0
0
2
1
2
2
0
0
1
3
0
2
2
25
7
11
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
3
1
3
3
0
0
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
5
2
27
5
12
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
3
0
1
29
3
1
2
I
1
2
0
1
1
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
o~l
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
i
29
3
2
0
2
2
1
1
0
2
1
2
1
1
0
o.
i
0
i
8
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
29
8
2
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
29
3
1
1
1
1
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
1
29
7
t
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
5
3
1
1
2
0
0
1
0
1
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
29
6
M
3
1
2
0
2
1
5
3
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
2
28
29
7
3
1
2
0
2
1
6
3
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
28
6
1
10
4
0
2
0
4
2
4
3
2
3
1
1
1
2
1
15
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
29
15
1
3
3
0
2
1
3
5
2
3
2
4
1
1
1
3
i
1
11
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
2
28
11
M
1
1
0
2
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
2
I
4
\,
0
3
0
I
1
1
1
0
0
3
0
0
1
28
4
11
1
2
0
1
1
3
1
0
3
3
2
1
1
0
3
2
0
4
0
1
I
2
1
2
0
6
0
0
1
28
6
ONLY
MOW
2.6
3.!>
1.6
1.3
2.5
2.8
2.3
2.4
2.6
1.8
2.4
2.8
1.0
0.7
1.9
3 0
1.0
2.9
3.8
0.8
1.0
0.5
0.1
0,8
1.1
2.6
l.S
1.0
2.6
».
OFW
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
19
MM
HAL
12
27
7
3
9
8
7
7
7
3
5
16
3
2
9
•j
4
36
26
4
4
9
1
4
4
51
9
9
60
1.9
68Z
-------
TABLE 3 is HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometnc analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
WOf ft
MM. ML
OF
NEEK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
•KAN
ITS
YMEAN
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
\<3
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
2
2
it
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
4
3
10
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
19
10
4
9
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
6
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
20
9
A
5
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
1
19
<3
m
c
i
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
2
3
0
2
b
0
1
0
0
1
20
5
J
0
0
0
2
1
0
2
I
0
0
-------
TABLE 3-19 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MMTNL1
•O.Of 0
MAX. MR
OF
KEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAI
SUN
'•EM
AYS
VMEAN
12
0
0
0
2
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
3
3
3
6
1
27
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
2
4
1
27
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
3
2
9
1
27
9
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
3
2
10
1
27
10
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
2
2
2
3
5
1
27
6
A
5
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
3
2
2
3
4
1
27
9
M
(
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
0
4
2
2
3
6
1
27
6
7
0
0
1
0
1
8
2
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
5
2
3
4
5
2
27
8
1
2
0
4
0
0
4
3
3
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
16
0
0
0
7
5
10
3
6
3
27
16
9
3
6
0
1
3
4
5
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
13
10
0
0
4
6
33
3
14
4
25
33
11
1
0
0
I
3
1
5
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
15
0
0
6
z
23
14
3
23
23
11
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
3
11
6
1
24
11
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
7
3
1
25
7
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
11
3
1
25
11
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
3
4
3
1
24
4
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
7
2
3
1
25
7
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
7
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
3
2
1
25
7
r
i
0
0
5
0
7
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
11
2
2
25
11
•
1
0
0
2
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
4
4
2
1
25
4
1
0
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
5
2
6
2
1
26
8
0
o ;
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
5
3
3
2
1
26
5
0 !
0
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
5
2
5
2
1
26
5
M
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
4
3
1
26
7
11
0
0
5
0
0
7
0
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
5
2
2
2
26
7
MM
mm
0.4
0.3
0.5
1.1
0.5
1.9
1.4
0.6
0.1
0.7
0.9
0.3
1.7
0.2
0.3
0.8
0.4
1.2
1.5
0.2
0.0
3.0
3.4
6.3
3.4
B 6
4.9
1.5
•>.
OFM
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
14
24
20
24
15
24
24
619
MM
•AIL
3
26
7
15
10
27
11
9
3
3
11
1
28
2
7
12
7
23
39
7
0
10
9
67
12
1 O
20
-------
TABLE 3-20 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
11
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
1
1
1
28
11
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
9
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
it
3
0
0
1
28
9
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
6
1
1
1
1
28
6
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
8
it
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
1
0
1
28
10
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
4
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
9
1
0
1
1
0
1
28
9
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
7
8
1
0
0
0
1
28
8
6
2
I
I
0
1
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
3
1
1
5
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
1
7
3
1
1
28
7
7
3
5
0
0
1
2
3
11
2
0
0
0
1
3
1
1
7
1
1
0
1
0
0
5
1
3
3
2
2
28
11
1
2
7
0
2
0
2
2
17
2
2
0
0
3
7
0
1
2
1
1
4
0
It
0
1
0
0
3
6
2
?8
17
9
2
7
0
2
1
0
3
5
2
0
4
0
0
1
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
11
2
24
11
11
0
2
0
1
8
0
1
4
0
0
2
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
25
8
11
0
1
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
7
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
28
13
P M
12
it
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
6
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
5
2
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
5
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
5
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
2
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
1
1
28
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
7
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
1
27
9
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
I
3
t
0
O
0
5
0
0
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
8
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
it
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
2
0
0
0
0
1
28
9
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
It
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
28
8
9
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
3
11
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
28
2
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
28
3
DAILY
MEAN
0.8
1.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
1.2
0.5
1.6
1.1
0.8
0.1
0.2
2.1
3.3
1.3
0.7
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.5
0.2
0.8
2.7
0.9
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.2
NO.
OFM
24
24
24
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
5-MIN
MAX.
8
9
5
2
6
36
3
24
17
16
4
4
32
21
13
4
11
1
10
8
2
5
34
20
17
11
8
50
0.9
663
1
-------
TABLE 3-21 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI. AUGUST 1963
DAY
MOTTO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
HO Of D
MAXHM
OF
WEEK
THU
FBI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MPN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
10
0
1
1
27
10
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
28
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
1
1
28
6
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
0
0
1
1
28
10
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
28
4
A
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
28
3
M
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
I
1
1
0
4
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
28
4
1
0
3
0
2
1
0
1
1
3
0
0
2
3
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
3
2
2
3
2
1
28
3
1
1
3
0
2
5
0
0
5
7
0
0
1
9
1
0
0
It
5
2
0
0
2
3
3
1
3
2
2
23
9
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
5
•0
0
1
5
1
0
6
5
10
0
0
5
4
1
2
1
2
24
10
M
0
4
0
0
2
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
42
5
1
0
2
11
1
1
1
3
24
42
11
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
3
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
2
10
0
3
0
1
5
1
0
0
1
27
10
o
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
4
1
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
27
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
3
2
0
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
27
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
K,
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
25
5
' 1
«
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
1
26
4
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
5
0
3
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
1
25
P
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
5
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
4
1
17
0
0
0
2
26
17
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
9
0
0
0
1
26
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
0
26
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
26
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
27
2
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
?
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1?
0
0
0
1
27
12
11
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
9
* 1
0
0
I
?6
9
ONLY
MEM
0.2
0.8
0.8
0.0
0,3
0.7
0.1
o.o
1.0
1.5
0.2
0.0
°t3
1.6
1.7
1.7
0.0
1.2
3.1
0.8
0,7
0.1
0.8
1.6
3.9
1.0
0.4
0.6
0.9
NO.
mm
24
?4
7*
24
22
74
71
1ft
74
23
24
24
24
74
15
21
24
24
74
24
74
24
23
19
24
24
24
24
642
MM
MM.
2
22
6
1
2
14
13
1
16
18
5
1
2
39
12
15
2
24
99
16
6
1
21
5
35
13
3
20
-------
TABLE 3-22 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1963
DAY
warn
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•BRIM.'
M.OFO
MM. mi
OF
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
Mf)N
TUE
WED
TMU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FPI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
•EM
AYS
YNtAN
12
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
• 0
2
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
27
2
1
0
0
4
0
1
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
1
3
0
1
1
0
1
27
4
2
0
0
10
1
2
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
8
0
0
1
1
4
0
1
2
0
1
27
10
3
0
0
10
1
2
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
It
0
3
0
0
1
27
10
4
1
0
6
2
1
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
2
2
0
5
0
0
1
27
6
A
5
i
0
8
2
2
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
2
0
2
0
0
1
27
8
H
t
1
1
3
0
2
2
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
4
1
1
2
2
1
0
z
2
0
1
27
4
7
2
1
0
2
4
2
0
1
4
4
0
0
0
2
2
2
6
1
1
3
5
2
0
3
4
3
2
27
6
1
5
1
2
0
3
6
5
1
4
5
3
2
0
0
4
5
2
7
0
1
3
4
4
0
5
5
5
3
27
7
S
5
0
0
4
5
9
4
5
2
0
0
0
4
6
6
6
0
3
I
8
8
7
2
3
23
9
11
2
5
0
1
3
2
8
2
5
5
0
0
0
3
5
2
0
0
0
14
10
10
1
3
23
14
11
1
12
0
1
2
3
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
5
3
1
0
0
0
16
4
4
1
1
3
24
16
12
1
9
1
1
1
2
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
I
0
0
0
1
4
2
3
0
1
1
26
9
1
1
6
1
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
0
0
1
26
6
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0-
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
1
3
I
4
0
0
1
26
4
0
7
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
1
26
7
0
8
1
0
0
2
3
2
0
8
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
5
1
2
0
0
1
26
8
P
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
4
10
1
1
0
0
1
27
10
•
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
27
5
7
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
27
12
1
0
0
0
0 '
1 1
0
1
0
1
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
27
23
9
0 ;
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
27
9
N
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2T
5
11
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
27
4
OM.Y
•EM
0.9
2.4
2.2
0.4
1.5
1.5
1.9
0.8
0.8
1.3
3.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.1
1.5
U*
2.0
0.1
0.2
0.8
1.7
3.8
1.3
2.6
0.8
1.3
•>.
OFM
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
yy
632
MM
•ML
6 '
26 '
17
3
5
8
14
5
5
8
33
2
2
0
5
7
14
12
1
2
3
9
26
12
16
6
-------
TABLE 3-23 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
0
5
1
1
1
3
2
2
I
2
0
3
2
1
1
0
6
7
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
i *
16
2
26
16
1
0
5
2
1
9
4
2
1
1
2
0
3
2
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
26
9
2
0
2
2
1
14
3
2
1
1
2
0
4
2
1
I
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
2
26
14
3
1
3
2
1
5
2
2
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
26
5
4
1
4
2
I
I
2
1
1
I
I
4
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
25
4
5
1
5
2
1
6
2
2
I
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
1
26
8
6
1
5
2
I
5
i
3
1
a
i
2
4
7
1
1
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
2
26
8
7
4
6
2
1
10
2
5
2
8
1
2
6
4
3
2
1
1
0
2
1
0
1
0
2
1
3
26
10
8
3
6
4
1
6
4
6
I
b
1
2
10
3
5
4
4
2
0
3
1
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
26
10
9
1
5
5
7
3
6
4
3
1
2
4
7
7
6
2
0
2
2
2
4
2
2
3
4
24
11
10
1
1
3
5
13
0
2
5
5
3
1
2
7
13
42
17
10
2
2
6
10
B
6
1
4
4
7
26
42
11
1
0
10
2
9
0
2
3
2
5
0
1
3
8
8
4
18
12
2
3
3
10
3
5
5
1
0
2
4
4
29
18
P M
12
0
0
16
2
1
0
2
2
1
5
0
1
1
2
9
1
1
1
0
2
9
4
3
2
3
0
0
0
2
29
16
1
0
0
7
2
1
0
2
2
1
3
0
1
1
6
1
1
0
2
0
2
5
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
29
7-
2
1
0
4
3
1
1
2
3
4
1
0
1
2
3
1
0
2
4
1
2
1
2
2
1
0
0
5
1 1
4 , 0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
5
0
0
0
1
0
1
29
5
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
4
0
1
0
0
1
2
29
14
4
1
0
2
2
2
1
0
1
3
1
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1 a
19
1
28
19
5
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1 f
16
1
28
6
1
0
1
1
I
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
2
y f
f-c.
1
28
16 22
7
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
I
0
0
1
1
4
1
28
4
8
1
2
2
1
0
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
2
1
3
1
28
4
9
1
2
2
1
0
4
4
3
1
1
0
1
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
I
0
0
2
I
6
f.
H
2
28
6
IB
0
3
2
1
0
2
4
3
1
1
0
2
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
8
2
28
8
11
0
4
1
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
0
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
14
2
28
14
DAILY
MEAN
0.7
1.0
4.1
2.1
2.1
3.5
2.0
2.6
1.8
2.4
0.6
0.8
3.3
2.7
2.6
3.1
2.3
1.4
0.6
1.1
2.1
1.8
2.6
1.1
0.9
0.6
0.6
2.2
A 3
o. J
NO.
OFHR
14
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
16
15
24
24
13
24
24
74
fc"t
5-MIN
MAX.
2
4
28
9
25
15
5
7
15
10
2
2
10
21
16
75
82
20
10
4
17
17
12
11
9
2
2
31
i t
oo
2.1
652
-------
TABLE 3-24 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MNTHt.'
HO.OFO
MAX.HM
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MON
TUE
THU
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
KM
AYS
YMEAN
12
0
1
2
4
2
2
1
1
2
2
4
1
9
11
1
2
1
4
1
5
1
4
3
1
3
1
2
3
30
11
1
0
2
2
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
4
2
10
30
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
4
3
2
3
1
2
3
30
30
2
0
3
3
4
2
1
2
1
3
2
4
1
7
17
1
2
1
0
1
0
1
2
4
3
3
1
2
3
30
17
3
0
2
3
5
2
1
2
1
3
2
3
1
11
11
1
2
1
0
1
0
1
2
3
5
3
1
2
3
30
11
4
1
1
3
A
2
1
3
2
3
2
3
1
6
13
1
2
3
0
1
0
1
2
3
3
5
1
2
3
30
13
A
5
2
1
4
3
2
1
3
2
3
2
3
1
10
22
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
2
6
3
2
1
2
3
30
22
H
t
1
JL
5
7
2
3
2
2
4
2
4
2
4
23
1
4
5
1
1
0
1
2
22
3
2
2
2
4
30
23
7
1
1
5
15
3
4
3
2
4
4
7
2
4
22
3
10
9
1
3
0
1
1
13
3
2
2
2
5
30
22
1
1
1
5
30
3
3
3
2
6
6
3
13
16
7
11
B
6
4
0
1
1
7
2
2
3
6
28
30
9
1
1
10
7
3
2
4
a
5
7
3
6
7
7
7
6
3
0
1
3
6
10
2
4
5
27
10
10
1
1
7
18
3
2
3
8
5
2
3
6
2
4
7
6
10
3
0
3
4
3
4
6
2
2
4
28
18
11
1
1
1
4
8
2
2
2
20
2
4
3
6
1
3
8
5
3
0
4
6
2
3
6
2
2
4
29
20
12
1
1
4
4
17
2
2
2
10
1
3
2
2
1
2
5
3
1
1
0
7
5
2
3
8
2
2
3
30
17
1
1
1
5
6
11
2
1
3
1
2
2
2
1
3
4
3
3
2
0
2
9
2
3
4
2
2
3
29
11
1
1
5
19
1)
2
2
1
2
t
2
2.
i
i
2
10
1
6
2
0
2
11
2
2
2
2
2
3
30
19
1
1
7
9
7
1
2
1
10
6
1
2
2
2
1
1
23
2
1
2
0
3
11
1
1
2
2
2
4
30
23
1
0
7
7
2
1
1
0
6
1
2
7
3
1
18
1
1
2
0
4
10
1
1
2
2
2
3
29
18
P
1
1
5
2
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
6
2
2
13
1
1
2
1
5
15
2
1
4
2
2
3
29
15
H
1
1
3
3
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
7
2
7
1
1
1
1
6
6
5
1
5
2
2
3
30
16
7
0
2
6
3
2
1
2
2
3
1
2
2
i
i*
3
6
1
1
0
1
6
2
3
1
4
2
3
3
30
14
1
0
2
6
3
1
1
2
3
3
1
2
2
2
7
3
3
8
1
9
1
6
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
30
9
1
0
2
7
5
1
1
2
2
4
1
1
2
3
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
6
8
2
1
2
2
4
3
30
17
H
1
2
3
3
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
2
i n
6
8
2
1
2
1
0
1
4
5
1
1
2
2
4
3
39
IB
11
1
2
6
2
7
1
1
2
4
2
2
i
2
i *
3
5
2
1
3
1
3
1
4
4
1
3
2
2
2
3
30
13
DM.V
KM
0.7
1.4
4.6
6.5
5.0
1.7
1.9
1.7
4.9
a o
1.8
3.0
20
2.0
A 7
5.5
9.4
2.2
6.4
3.2
2.2
2.2
0.6
3.0
5.1
3.9
2.7
3.5
1.8
2.4
3.4
HO.
OFM
24
24
24
22
24
24
23
24
24
OA
21
23
?4
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
709
MM)
ML
2
4 i
16 :
38
25
4
3
4
55
6
7
4
^4
22
35
11
29
14
11
18
9
10
18
24
10
19
2
5
-------
TABLE 3-25 HOURLY AVERAGES OF SULFUR DIOXIDE, pphm (conductometric analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WtD
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF HAYS
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
2
2
1
2
2
3
12
2
0
2
2
2
2
4
3
7
4
7
6
6
3
12
2
2
8
3
29
12
1
I
?
1
2
2
4
8
?
?
2
2
2
2
4
2
5
3
5
4
10
3
10
1
1
6
3
29
10
2
1
?
1
2
1
?
7
?
1
2
2
?
3
5
5
7
3
5
3
9
3
10
1
1
it
3
29
10
3
2
2
1
1
1
9
8
2
1
2
2
1
3
5
4
7
3
4
3
7
3
9
1
1
2
3
29
9
4
3
3
2
1
1
8
9
2
1
2
2
1
3
7
4
7
3
3
3
6
2
4
1
1
2
5
29
9
5
3
3
2
1
1
7
11
14
0
3
2
1
4
9
4
5
4
5
3
6
2
4
1
1
2
6
29
14
(
3
1
2
2
2
4
11
11
0
5
2
I
5
9
3
4
4
6
3
8
3
4
2
1
4
8
4
29
11
7
2
4
2
4
1
fl
13
2
1
2
2
1
4
10
3
4
6
6
4
9
4
5
2
1
4
9
5
29
13
1
1
?
4
2
3
1
7
6
2
1
2
2
1
3
12
3
5
7
6
4
10
4
5
4
1
3
9
5
?9
12
9
2
2
1
5
13
2
6
2
2
3
12
3
5
10
6
5
5
4
2
1
3
9
5
23
13
11
2
4
2
2
5
0
2
2
3
5
9
3
5
12
6
4
5
3
2
3
7
5
23
15
11
2
2
2
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
4
3
i y
18
4
9
8
4
8
5
5
3
3
4
7
5
27
18
P M
12
1
4
4
2
3
3
1
1
4
2
4
3
• ?
1*
3
3
7
9
6
8
5
5
2
2
4
14
7
5
28
14
1
1
4
7
1
3
9
1
2
2
2
3
3
11
2
4
5
9
5
10
6
4
2
2
3
12
6
5
28
12
2
1
2
5
6
2
5
3
1
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
8
6
0
1
3
2
2
3 3
8 L-
9
2
3
4
7
5
10
4
6
5
a
2
3
6
4
29
1Q
7
2
2
4
7
7
9
5
5
3
2
5
4
29
9
4
2
3
3
1
2
7
5
0
0
3
2
2
2
4
4
2
3
4
7
3
7
8
2
2
2
2
5
4
29
8
5
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
0
7
2
2
2
7
3
2
3
5
7
3
7
13
2
3
2
3
6
4
29
13
C
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
0
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
4
6
7
12
2
2
5
3
6
29
12
7
3
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
a
3
2
3
4
11
8
8
2
2
9
3
6
29
11
t
3
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
3
- 4
2
3
4
10
7
4
9
4
2
10
4
7
29
10
9
3
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
i,
7
2
3
5
11
6
3
12
7
2
8
4
7
29
12
11
3
1
1
1
1
12
1
1
2
2
1
2
3
4
3
2
3
6
13
6
3
10
3
2
6
4
7
29
13
11
3
1
2
1
1
9
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
5
4
7
9
5
3
12
2
2
5
4
8
29
12
DAILY
MEAN
2.2
2.5
2.2
1.9
i.!>
5.0
5.8
2.1
1.1
2.9
2.0
2.0
3.2
5.4
7.2
2.8
4.2
!>.
-------
TABLE 3-26 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. Of 0
MAX. HR
OF
WEEK
MPN
TOE
wp
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
0
2
1
1
2
3
6
1
2
9
7
4
8
1
22
1
2
8
1
0
4
21
22
1
0
1
I
0
3
2
8
1
1
8
, 5
5
7
1
16
2
2
6
1
0
3
21
16
2
0
1
0
0
2
?
7
1
1
5
5
2
3
£
11
2
2
f.
1
(!
- 3
21
11
3
0
1
(i
0
2
2
5
1
1
4
b
1
2
1
6
2
1
3
i
0
2
21
6
4
0
1
0
1
2
3
3
1
1
1
3
1
2
0
9
1
1
4
1
1
2
21
9
A
5
0
1
0
I
3
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
0
5
1
1
4
1
1
2
21
5
M
t
0
1
1
2
5
6
I
2
3
3
2
1
4
3
7
2
1
4
2
2
3
21
7
7
0
2
1
2
7
9
3
5
8
3
2
9
4
10
2
?
20
10
1
c
4
1
3
7
13
3
10
5
1
9
19
3
c
5
6
5
6
16
19
»
0
7
1
3
7
8
0
8
8
7
6
11
4
2
7
5
5
17
11
M
0
1
2
5
6
0
6
6
3
6
5
5
8
4
2
7
4
17
10
11
0
1
2
5
3
4
5
3
9
6
7
5
4
2
6
15
9
U
0
2
2
4
3
5
4
4
6
7
3
4
1
4
3
4
16
7
1
2
2
1
4
2
3
3
7
7
2
3
1
3
3
15
7
2
4
1
4
3
2
2
4
2
4
5
1
1
3
9
5
2
2
3
4
5
5
4
1
6
2
2
2
3
14
6
P
5
5
2
3
4
2
4
6
1
4
4
9
5
3
Z
5
3
' 3 ' '
4
19
9
M
5
U
3
3
6
3
5
6
0
4
6
7
6
6
3
4
4
1
3
5
19
14
4
13
2
3
5
2
4
6
0
8
5
10
2
4
5
4
0
6
5
19
13
3
24
2
3
4
2
5
6
0
8
4
21
2
4
4
2
0
' ,
-------
TABLE 3-27 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WF.D
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
3
(
b
32
0
p
1
2
2
2
?
.-,
0
1
1
I
I
I
I
~
i
J
]_
i
1
I
2
2
1
2^
32
1
2
3
5
2*
0
0
1
2
1
2
2
^
0
0
I
1
1
0
L
/>
U'
2
0
I
1
0
0
1
1
2
2H
?a
2
?
4
:s
22
0
0
1
?
1
•1
-1
4
p
o
fj
!
|
•1
1
!
^
1
I
2?
3
2
5
2
72
0
1
1
-1
t
1
T
1
£.
;"
(.
0
•w
il
„.
•
,
> /
4
2
6
2
17
0
0
1
2
0
2
I
h
0
0
f,
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
•'.•3
i ?
5
3
6
2
15
0
0
2
2
0
1
1
Q
1
0
0
2
0
0
I
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
28
1 •>
S
6
9
4
Ib
1
1
3
2
0
1
£
6
2
0
2
3
1
0
1
1
2
I
1
I
1
i
1
J
2
28
15
7
P
17
6
1 1
1
3
fc
13
2
1
?
r-
7
i
(.
4
1
(!
b
\
^
1
~1
1
;
,
1
1
it
?.
\ <
1
f.
?3
7
K
3
i,
9
I,
3
<:
5
c,
1
J.1
fr
L
1
.-,
d.
"i
1
£
•~i 1
9
9
21
6
10
2
3
7
5
4
3
3
4
4
3
6
1
1
2
1
3
3
3
2
2
3
t,
Z-)
21
1«
6
3
9
2
3
6
3
2
3
3
4
1
3
3
1
1
2
1
2
3
3
11
4
2
5
2
3
5
4
2
3
3
3
1
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
2 2
2
2
1
3
?4
9
2
2
1
2
23
5
P H
12
4
c,
]
2
3
3
3
2
^
3
3
2
1
2
3
1
C
2
<4
^
1
1
9
;>"*
s
1
5
3
2
1
2
3
4
3
2
2
3
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
3
H
2
2
1
2
21
5
2
3
4
3
1
2
1
4
8
4
1
0
2
2
4
2
3
|
2
2
1
4
2
1
3
3
1
2
4
2
20
4
5
2
3
3
2
2
2
5
1
2
2
2
t
£.
1
2
<,
3
24
•^'
S
9
5
•a
c
?
3
4
5
3
4
5
5
3
2
£.
1
b
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
'.i
o
j
i
?7
7
(
6
5
11
3
1
2
7
4
4
3
4
3
4
3
2
3
2
7
1
2
3
1
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
?8
11
7
6
4
23
3
1
2
5
3
2
3
3
2
4
1
2
3
2
6
1
3
3
2
1
2
5
2
1
2
3
2R
23
1
7
5
30
2
1
2
4
2
3
3
7
1
5
1
2
2
2
8
1
5
3
3
1
4
2
2
2
1
4
2r<
30
S
5
4
?6
1
1
2
t
?
3
2
5
1
6
1
2
£
'f.
9
0
f.
1
2
10
3
4
33
1
1
2
#j
2
^
2
4
1
7
?
1
1
1
V
0
b
X
f.
1 • 2
1 1
?
11
4
4
39
1
1
2
3
3
4
3
b
1
5
2
1
1
1
4
0
7
1
1
1
2
1
2 . 2
* i 3
1
i,
?7
2r
2
i-r
27
33
i
1
4
Zti
39
DAILY
MEAN
5.1
6.8
9.S
9.7
1.0
1.6
3.6
3.1
2.7
2.3
3.0
3.6
2.9
1.3
1.8
2.1
1.2
3.1
1.5
2.0
2.1
1.*
1.9
1.6
1.5
1.8
2.4
1.3
NO.
OFHR
23
21
23
22
19
21
20
21
23
22
23
21
22
21
23
22
23
23
22
19
23
23
20
23
23
23
1R
21
5-MIN
MAX.
10
23
46
35
3
5
10
7
6
5
7
12
10
4
7
8
2
12
9
11
8
5
5
6
5
5
7
4
2.9
608
-------
TABLE 3-28 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI. MARCH 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
. 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. OF ft
MAX. MIL
OF
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN,
MQN
TME
W£D
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN-
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
.THU
FRI
SAT
MEAN
ftYS
YMEAN
12
1
1
3
1
5
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
1
12
I
1
2.
0
I
I
3
16
1
1
3
12
3
1
4
3
30
16
1
1
1
3
1
it
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
I
8
1
8
1
0
0
0
2
19
I
4
11
1
. 0
3
3
28
19
2
0
1
2
1
4
0
1
2
2
I
0
0
1
H
1
6
1
0
0
0
2
24
1
5
q
0
0
3
3
28
24
3
0
0
i
1
0
0
2
I
1
0
0
1
' 10
1
5
1
0
0
0
2
17
I
5
7
1
0
1
2
27
17
4
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
8
1
5
1
0
0
0
1
6
0
6
7
1
0
1
2
27
8
A
5
0
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
7
1
4
I
0
1
0
2
13
0
5
8
1
0
1
2
27
13
M
6
0
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
0
2
7
1
4
2
3
2
1
3
7
0
9
2
2
2
2
26
9
7
1
3
3
3
4
4
6
3
2
5
1
1
5
9
1
5
4
4
4
3
5
8
0
5
11
5
3
5
4
29
11
1
3
4
3
3
5
9
^
4
2
5
1
1
6
9
2
5
3
4
5
4
5
14
1
6
11
6
5
6
5
29
14
»
3
4
3
3
4
6
8
3
3
1
2
1
4
8
1
4
5
2
5
3
4
8
1
4
11
3
5
5
4
29
11
It
2
2
3
3
3
2
7
3
3
1
1
2
3
4
1
2
1
2
3
4
1
3
5
1
5
5
3
27
7
11
3
2
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
1
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
1
1
5
5
2
28
5
12
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
4
3
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
I
2
2
1
0
4
1
1
1
4
4
2
29
4
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
4
2
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
I
I
0
4
3
2
30
4
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
2
4
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
1
4
2
0
1
1
1
4
2
2
26
4
4
3
2
2
4
3
4
2
4
2
2
2
1
3
4
2
1
1
0
1
5
4
1
1
1
1
1
5
2
2
29
5
r
$
4
4
3
4
4
5
4
5
1
2
1
1
3
4
3
2
1
1
2
4
5
6
0
1
2
2
2
2
6
3
3
31
6
M
C
3
4
3
5
3
3
4
4
2
2
1
1
2
3
2
2
1
0
2
3
4
3
0
1
1
1
2
1
5
2
2
31
5
7
2
3,
2
8
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
3
I
2
2
1
1
2
4
3
1
1
1
2
2
3
6
3
2
30
8
1
3
3
4
9
2
3
3
3
2
1
0
1
3
1
1
2
0
2
1
3
4
2
1
2
4
2
1
4
. 6
3
30
9
S
2
3
2
8
2
2
4
3
1
1
0
1
4
1
2
5
1
1
2
3
9
1
2
2
11
2
1
4
3
3
30
11
11
2
3
2
8
2
1
2
2
2
1
0
2
9
2
3
7
1
1
1
4
10
1
2
3
10
1
1
5
i
3
30
10
11
2
2
2
7
2
i
1
3
3
1
0
0
2
2
3
5
0
1
i :.
4
9 .
1
2
2
10
2
1
6
3
3
29
10
DAILY
MEAN
1.8
2.2
2.4
4.1
3.2
3.1
2.1
3.4
2.3
1.9
1.*
0.6
1.2
3.1
4.8
1.3
3.6
1.3
1.*
1.9
2.5
4.2
6.3
0.9
2.7
5.3
4.1
1.6
3.3
3.1
2.7
NO
OFM
23
23
23
17
14
16
1 Q
22
23
22
22
23
23
23
22
23
23
23
23
23
18
23
19
23
22
15
23
18
23
23
23
660
5-MIN
MAX.
5
5
5
10
6
5
10
9
4
4
7
2
4
11
13
4
9
7
6 •
7
7
12
26
2
7
14
14
8
7-
8
-------
TABLE 3-29 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MQN
TUE
WED
TfjU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MQN
TU.E
W5D
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WQD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
•OmNLTMEM
HO.OFMYS
MAX. HHIY MEAN
A M
12
1
1
3
13
16
0
1
4
1
2
5
2
0
1
8
6
I
4
4
18
16
1
2
1
2
9
11
0
2
3
0
1
5
3
0
0
12
7
2
3
5
5
18
14
9
3
3
4
7
10
3
2
1
1
3
1
0
0
4
3
2
2
2
3
18
10
10
2
1
11
2
1
2 2
5 2
4
2
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
4
1
2
?
17
5
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
0
2
1
2
15
2
r M
12
2
I
2
1
2
5
1
1
I
2
1
0
2
1
I
15
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
3
1
1
1
16
3
2
3
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
12
2
4
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
1
17
2
S
1
2
1
2
3
3
I
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
17
3
C
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
17
2
7
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
2
1
2
1
18
2
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
5
2
0
2
2
0
0
1
5
1
2
2
2
18
5
1
I
3
6
8
1
2
3
1
0
2
1
0
1
2
8
2
2
2
3
IB
8
M I
2
4
11
13
I
2
4
i ;
i
3
1
0
1
4
12
1
3
4
4
18
xa
11
2
4
15
16
1
1
5
1
2
5
2
0
2
6
21
1
5
5
9
18
21
ONLY
•UN
1.6
2.0
3.6
6.4
5.8
1.6
2.8
1.1
0.8
2.1
2.1
0.3
0.3
*.«
6.*
2.2
1.4
2.*
M).
OF Ml
23
23
22
22
23
23
23
23
19
23
23
22
13
20
20
23
23
23
MM
MM.
3
7
17
19
18
5
8
4
3
7
13
3
3
23
26
9
6
7
2.6
991
-------
TABLE 3-30 HOURLY AVERAGE? OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
OF
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY M£AM
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. MRLV MEAN
12
4
0
5
21
3
2
1
1
1
0
2
5
6
3
6
1
1
0
0
1
6
3
21
21
1
2
0
1
?0
4
1
0
1
0
0
1
3
3
9
5
1
1
0
0
2
4
3
21
20
2
1
0
1
15
3
n
0
i
0
0
2
4
2
4
7
0
1
0
0
I
4
2
21
\j
3
0
0
1
15
4
0
0
1
0
0
3
'+
2
5
6
1
0
0
0
I
3
2
21
15
4
1
0
0
13
6
0
2
0
0
0
3
4
2
3
4
0
0
0
0
2
3
2
21
13
A
5
2
0
1
15
7
1
2
1
0
0
5
5
3
4
4
1
0
1
0
2
1
3
21
15
M
«
4
1
3
24
12
1
5
4
1
1
10
9
9
9
5
2
1
2
0
3
2
5
21
24
7
5
2
5
23
7
0
6
10
2
2
13
10
10
7
IS
2
3
2
0
-------
TABLE 3-31 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1962
DAY OF
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
WMTNLTMEM
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. WHY MEAN
A M
12
2
0
0
0
I
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
:)
3
10
3
4
0
C
1
0
1
7
0
10
0
6
2
27
10
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
«
5
7
3
0
0
1
0
2
6
0
10
0
if
2
26
10
2
1
:>
0
0
1
3
0
I
I
n
!
I
7
3
H
<,
(J
0
0
0
1
6
0
9
0
3
2
2b
9
3
1
'.)
>)
.)
L
0
0
I
I
0
1
0
H
3
10
3
0
0
0
0
1
9
0
a
0
5
2
2-i
10
4
1
a
i
0
0
0
0
i
0
0
1
0
2
2
10
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
7
0
5
1
26
10
5
1
n
1
0
0
0
0
I
1
1
0
0
4
3
11
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
8
2
3
2
26
11
6
7
1 • I
0
2
0
2
0
1
1
I
2
2
2
8
5
8
4
2
1
I
0
6
0
9
4
5
3
25
9
0
2
1
1
0
2
I
1
1
4
5
10
5
6
6
3
2
2
1
6
2
8
3
6
3
25
10
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
2
I
1
I
<»
-------
TABLE 3-32 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1962
DAY OF
noun
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
NEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
S'JN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEAN
NO Of OATS
MAX MAYHEM
12
4
0
0
1
0
0
5
1
1
3
2
0
1
1
0
3
14
I
I
3
2
20
14
1
8
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
3
0
0
1
2
0
2
11
1
1
3
?
?0
11
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
I
0
4
1
0
I
I
;)
2
1(1
1
I
3
2
?0
10
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
2
0
1
1
0
I
10
0
0
2
1
20
10
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
3
2
0
1
0
0
2
3
0
1
2
1
20
8
A
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
2
2
0
2
1
0
4
7
0
5
4
2
20
7
M
1
0
0
2
0
1
4
0
0
7
2
2
3
2
1
7
6
1
5
5
2
20
7
2
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
7
1
3
5
3
1
7
5
1
7
H
3
20
t)
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
-------
TABLE 3-33 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 196?
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO.OFD
MAX. HRl
OF
WEEK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
TMU
FRI
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
4
5
16
11
2
0
3
8
1
3
I
1
0
0
22
7
1
14
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
4
11
3
17
1
31
22
1
5
4
14
8
2
0
3
7
1
2
1
0
0
0
18
7
1
12
1
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
5
7
4
15
0
31
18
2
4
5
12
6
i
0
2
7
0
2
I
0
0
0
1-5
6
1
13
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
I
4
6
10
13
0
31
15
3
5
8
11
6
2
0
2
6
0
2
1
0
0
0
13
7
1
12
1
0
0
7
0
0
0
1
6>
b
11
8
0
31
13
4
11
10
4
1
0
X
5
0
2
1
0
0
0
9
9
4
9
1
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
4
7
12
9
0
31
12
A
4
11
10
3
I
0
1
6
0
3
1
0
0
0
7
10
4
9
1
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
7
10
13
16
0
31
16
M
6
12
13
3
1
0
1
6
1
5
1
0
0
1
3
8
6
12
1
1
0
12
1
1
0
0
9
14
16
18
1
31
18
7
18
1.5
2
2
2
1
3
5
2
1
0
4
5
11
6
9
1
2
0
14
11
2
1
0
10
20
14
17
5
6
30
20
7
7
2
1
2
2
<.
i
i
1
0
4
8
3
1
1
1
11
5
3
1
0
5
17
13
14
6
27
17
3
1
1
0
0
3
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
7
4
4
25
7
It
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
I
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
27
3
11
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
< 1
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
27
2
12
0
0
0
0
I
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
.1
30
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
31
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
28
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
31
3
P
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
31
3
M
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
2
1
31
2
7
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
1
2
1
31
2
1
4
0
0
1
0
1
\
1
1
1
?
0
?
?
2
2
5
5
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
5
1
1
2
31
5
J
7
7
2
1
1
?
1
1
1
4
?
0
?
7
5
3
14
6
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
3
3
2
6
1
2
3
31
14
11
5
5
5
I
2
1
2
1
1
10
2
0
I
16
3
3
10
3
1
1
0
1
1
I
0
3
10
2
9
1
3
4
31
16
11
6
2
9
2
1
3
6
1
2
7
1
0
1
19
10
4
13
3
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
4
13
2
9
1
2
4
31
19
DAILY
MEAN
3.8
4.1
5.4
2.2
0.8
1.3
1.5
2.8
1.2
2.6
1.1
0.3
0.8
3.1
5.8
4.2
3.7
5.0
0.8
0.4
0.2
3.5
1.0
0.7
0.6
1.0
4.3
4.9
6.1
6.1
1.7
2.6
NO.
Of M
20
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
23
19
23
23
22
21
22
23
22
23
23
23
22
22
23
23
23
22
21
23
22
23
20
690
5-MIN
MAX.
10
19
19
12
2
5
7
8
4
16
4
3
4
21
23
14
18
17
3
4
4
16
13
5
3
5
13
21
19
20
9
-------
TABLE 3-34 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
•UNINLYMEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
1
3
1
3
19
1
1
5
9
16
1
1
1
0
2
3
2
2
25
2
0
9
15
5
23
25
1
1
3
1
1
16
1
1
5
9
11
0
1
0
0
1
3
2
1
26
1
0
7
17
5
23
26
2
1
3
I
1
1
1
4
7
^
n
i
0
0
i
2
1
1
22
1
0
9
15
4
22
3
1
3
0
0
12
1
4
6
7
1
1
n
0
i
i
l
i
25
0
0
7
12
^
23
25
4
1
2
0
0
12
0
3
3
6
6
n
1
0
0
3
2
0
20
1
0
10
3
22
20
5
i
3
0
0
12
0
3
2
b
5
0
1
0
0
4
2
4
0
16
0
0
B
3
22
16
6
2
7
j
4 • 4
1
2
15
0
3
2
11
8
1
2
0
0
5
2
7
3
16
3
1
7
4
22
16
2
^
22
0
3
<,
15
14
i
3
0
3
7
2
7
19
13
6
6
7
7
22
22
<
-,
••
4
H
17
1
i
6
1 1
12
i,
2
0
3
b
fl
12
7
6
6
6
6
21
17
9
2
4
3
2
6
2
2
5
6
4
2
0
2
2
3
7
6
4
3
3
5
5
4
22
7
10
1
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
1
1
1
3
5
2
1
2
3
3
3
2
21
5
11
1
2
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
2
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
21
4
P M
12
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
2
1
2
1
1
0
1
18
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
5
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
19
5
2
3
1
0
1
1
0
2
2
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
17
2
4
^
0
^
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
0
1
21
3
5
2
0
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
0
1
2
4
4
3
2
1
0
2
20
4
(
2
0
3
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
2
0
1
1
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
20
3
7
3
0
3
2
3
2
3
6
5
3
2
0
1
2
4
5
2
7
8
8
3
20
8
1
3
2
3
2
9
3
3
6
9
3
3
C
i
2
2
8
0
2
17
12
15
5
21
17
»
3
4
4
3
16
2
4
8
12
2
2
0
z
3
2
6
0
1
19
16
16
6
21
19
U
4
3
5
13
2
5
12
11
2
1
0
2
4
3
6
15
2
12
16
21
7
20
21
11
4
1
5
14
1
5
11
18
1
1
0
0
2
3
2
6
19
1
11
16
25
7
21
29
OM.Y
HUN
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.7
8.7
1.5
2.5
4.1
6.7
5.0
1.5
1.2
0.1
1.0
2.5
2.7
4.1
3.2
13.8
1.9
4.3
6.5
8.7
NO.
OF Ml
23
22
23
23
21
23
21
23
22
23
19
15
20
23
22
22
23
16
15
22
22
18
22
S4MN
MAX.
4
6
6
19
24
4
5
14
23
22
4
3
8
5
8
6
13
24
27
8
22
33
26
3.8
483
-------
TABLE 3-35 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WHO
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FR!
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WFn
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. MR.Y MEAN
A M
12
26
0
2
17
5
5
2
1
1
15
2
1
4
4
5
1
1
23
14
12
1
1
3
16
1
1
16
7
28
26
1
7
0
1
13
5
3
2
1
1
12
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
19
13
VI
1
1
4
16
U
1
9
6
2fi
27
2
2Z
2
1
9
6
3
1
2
1
11
1
1
1
5
3
1
I
Hi
11
in
1
1
r>
'+
11
0
2
s
'•3
29
22
3
19
2
0
9
6
13
1
2
1
10
1
0
I
4
2
1
2
12
10
6
1
0
5
H
•j
0
2
3
4
?9
V)
4
16
1
0
7
5
8
1
1
I
10
1
1
1
6
2
1
1
12
9
5
1
1
1
4
5
0
1
3
4
29
16
5
16
0
0
9
7
9
1
1
1
15
1
1
I
6
7
I
2
14
9
5
1
1
2
4
6
0
2
3
4
29
16
t
19
0
1
10
10
8
1
2
2
22
3
1
1
7
8
4
4
18
13
6
1
2
5
4
6
0
4
4
6
29
22
7
27
2
3
17
15
9
1
5
4
22
7
2
2
b
8
5
10
23
21
11
1
f-
7
4
6
n
«
7
9
29
27
1
14
5
3
24
16
7
1
3
4
19
6
3
2
5
7
4
8
15
21
S
1
5
6
-------
TABLE 3-36 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
IMMTHtV MFU
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HRIY MEAN
A M
12
4
12
2
2
2
4
1
3
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
4
17
4
23
21
19
21
23
1
5
fa
2
3
2
3
1
2
1
2
3
2
19
3
3
0
2
19
3
20
19
10
22
20
2
7
f-,
2
2
'•'
3
n
2
1
-
3
?
lb
2
3
0
5
6
3
17
1 2
1 7
2?
17
3
~r
',
i.
2
'-
,
0
3
1
I
H
2
1 <.
*'.
2
1
b
7
4
•14
6
21
21
4
6
3
3
1
2
5
0
5
1
1
5
2
11
1
2
0
2
H
4
8
14
19
22
19
5
f,
5
3
1
2
6
2
6
I
I
4
2
13
1
2
1
1
13
4
7
14
20
22
20
6
H
7
1 '.
7 f,
•j
1
3
•5
4
7
2
1
4
5
18
i
7
3
1
18
6
10
16
28
22
28
/
2
S
?,2
^
^
r;
c.
7
10
77
3
1 I
7
4
2J
13
20
9
41
41
S
1 7
i:
7
c.
*
-,,
•)
10
7
1
8
13
34
i
1 6
%
6
19
21
IB
1 1
•58
?2
?6
9
12
6
7
3
8
29
4
8
6
1
9
9
18
9
6
U
5
5
8
15
13
55
22
55
10
7
4
11
4
3
6| 5
3 3
7 6
12
4
7
6
2
6
8
8
2
5
9
3
4
7
•5
50
21
50
6
3
6
5
2
3
8
a
3
6
6
4
4
4
3
39
21
39
P M
12
3
2
4
2
4
3
4
4
3
7
6
3
5
5
2
2
2
2
20
19
20
1
2
2
3
2
5
2
3
3
4
2
6
3
7
3
4
4
2
2
1
2
1
5
22
7
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
4
3
3
1
2
4
3
4
3
1
1
16
4
4
<*
5
2
2
6
3
5
/«
4
I
3
5
3
4
4
1
1
3
3
6
20
6
&
-^
„
3
3
*
j
3
2
2
6
6
3
6
1
2
8
9
7
5
20
9
i
5
6
3
3
7
4
5
4
4
2
5
8
5
5
5
8
3
17
6
5
5
21
17
7
5
6
3
2
5
2
3
2
4
2
4
3
4
4
5
4
2
5
14
4
5
21
14
1
6
5
4
2
<»
1
4
3
5
4
2
3
5
6
4
3
3
9
11
5
4
21
11
»
7
3
2
2
5
1
3
2
4
4
j.
3
5
5
4
1
3
18
9
9
4
4
22
18
M
7
3
2
2
4
0
3
2
4
2
3
3
5'
4
3
1
3
11
5
14
4
5
22
14
11
11
2
2
2
5
0
3
2
4
3
2
3
4
4
3
1
4
6
5
20
4
4
22
20
OM.Y
MUM
6.6
5.0
3.6
1.9
4.5
6.6
3.1
4.4
3.5
2.0
3.8
5.6
10.7
5.8
3.0
4.5
5.0
2.5
4.5
10.4
9.2
9.9
8. 5
28.6
NO.
OFM
23
23
22
23
22
23
23
23
23
19
23
14
19
14
22
13
23
23
23
22
13
18
22
14
S4UN
MAX.
19
14
8
4
9
33
8
13
8
5
10
15
40
10
7
8
19
10
19
33
26
28
27
60
.9
487
-------
TABLE 3-37 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
U
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WKD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
3
i
\
1
t.
\
L
2
1
?
•j
29
0
I
3
2
5
I
0
3
19
29
1
?J
I
1
1
1
6
1
1
p
0
1
4
25
0
4
1
2
2
4
4
0
21
25
2
1. .-:
1
~
1
|
I
1
>
26
0
'<.
\
1
1
4
3
2
0
22
26
3
1 s
-
;
'•>
' \
fi
j
1
3
:»o
0
i>.
i
i
^
;
3
2
1
22
30
4
! =
fi
f'
;•
'
•}
t-
"3
13
a
2
1
*
3
15
17
5
0
22
28
8
T .,
"
_l
,'
T,
••
\
!•
"
13
2
1
11
5
2U
?5
1<>
1
22
?')
9
30
6
4
2
4
1
4
7
6
4
12
4
2
8
5
16
17
20
1
20
30
10
29
5
3
1
2
2
7
7
4
10
4
2
13
5
15
11
23
3
19
29
11
18
3
2
2
1
2
6
4
<»
4
12
6
2
14
3
7
5
15
2
20
18
P M
12
13
3
2
2
1
2
4
1
4
4
11
5
2
1<»
4
3
3
5
2
20
1<>
1
6
4
3
2
2
1
2
2
7
3
1
4
4
10
6
2
9
4
2
2
3
22
10
2
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
5
0
3
2
2
3
3
11
4
4
3
14
11
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
2
2
5
4
2
3
4
14
6
5
5
3
5
0
2
22
14
S
6
4
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
8
6
3
5
16
5
2
4
6
8
5
0
2
23
16
6
10
4
3
3
2
1
2
3
3
9
10
4
3
14
6
2
2
8
8
6
1
3
23
U
7
7
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
1
8
11
4
2
15
3
2
3
9
5
6
0
4
23
15
8
9
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
0
9
14
3
1
10
4
2
3
8
3
5
1
5
23
14
9
12
2
2
2
4
1
1
2
1
9
18
3
1
3
2
2
6
4
4
0
4
22
18
10
*>
\
2
1
H
0
1
2
I
7
?H
3
I
2
3
2
4
3
4
1
5
22
24
11
5
3
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
5
34
3
0
2
2
2
4
6
1
0
5
22
34
DAILY
MEAN
14.7
2.9
2.1
1.3
1.8
2.1
1.3
1.7
27
2.4
4.9
7.2
10.5
2.5
8.0
3.4
1.7
5.1
4.2
8.1
6.5
4.9
1.9
NO
Of H*
22
20
22
22
23
23
19
21
pa
21
22
23
22
13
20
21
22
23
23
21
21
21
23
S-MIN
MAX.
42
7
5
3
5
10
5
3
9
10
36
33
6
18
8
3
17
10
22
30
25
7
4C
.'
401
-------
TABLE 3-38 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
•SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. WHY MEAN
A M
12
1
1
2
i.
5
1
2
1 1
9
11
1
1
0
1
5
5
1
3
7
9
7
2
1
n
]
5
6
1
2
7
9
7
3
0
0
1
5
7
1
2
6
9
7
4
0
0
2
3
5
1
1
4
9
5
5
0
1
2
4
5
1
2
4
9
5
6
2
5
5
5
1
3
9
8
9
7
3
5
9
1
1
5
15
8
15
8
6
6
9
2
1
6
24
8
24
9
5
5
2
1
4
24
7
24
10
6
3
6
2
2
6
14
8
14
11
4
5
8
2
1
4
7
9
P M
12
3
5
8
3
1
3
4
7
8
1
2
rj
11
3
1
<*
-------
TABLE 3-39 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (cotortmetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MONTHl
NO. OFI
MAX. Hi
OF
WEEK
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
YMEAN
MYS
LY MEAN
12
2
7
4
I
1
1
1
6
2
5
0
0
1
•j
1
4
1
1
4
2
20
7
1
2
5
3
1
1
0
1
8
2
11
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
4
2
20
11
2
1
6
2
0
1
0
0
10
2
16
0
0
I
0
1
0
1
3
2
20
16
3
1
4
1
0
1
0
0
12
2
16
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
4
2
20
16
1
3
0
1
0
0
10
2
14
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
4
2
19
14
A
1
3
0
1
0
1
7
5
13
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
6
3
19
13
M
1
3
2
3
1
1
5
6
17
1
0
2
0
2
3
3
20
4
19
20
1
3
4
4
1
3
6
9
20
3
0
3
0
3
6
6
28
6
19
28
3
3
7
6
2
6
14
11
30
4
1
3
0
6
9
6
30
B
19
30
6
3
6
6
1
5
8
14
1
3
0
7
5
4
32
6
17
32
N
6
4
1
5
5
6
2
1
2
0
7
3
4
33
5
16
33
11
5
5
4
4
1
4
4
3
2
1
2
0
4
2
2
3
17
5
12
5
4
3
3
3
1
3
2
1
1
2
0
3
2
2
16
3
18
16
1
3
4
3
2
3
1
3
2
1
1
2
0
2
2
7
2
17
7
2
3
3
2
2
0
2
3
6
3
4
3
6
2
2
2
1
3
2
1
0
1
2
1
3
2
3
5
2
18
6
r
s
4
13
4
2
3
1
3
2
3
1
0
1
2
0
3
2
4
7
3
20
13
M
(
6
11
3
1
3
1
4
2
2
4
2
0
1
2
0
3
2
4
6
3
20
11
7
8
8
2
1
3
1
4
4
4
3
0
1
3
1
2
2
2
4
3
20
8
1
a
9
2
1
2
1
6
5
3
2
0
1
3
1
1
1
3
2
3
20
9
9
6
7
2
2
1
1
7
3
3
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
4
2
2
20
7
11
8
4
2
1
2
1
5
4
5
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
5
1
3
20
8
11
8
4
2
1
1
1
5
4
7
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
3
20
8
DAK.Y
MEM
3.9
5.*
2.3
1.9
2.5
0.8
3.1
6.2
.8
*.3
8.1
0.7
0.6
2.0
.3
0.6
2.6
2.2
2.9
10.0
3.?
M.
OF HI
23
22
15
21
21
22
23
19
16
22
22
22
22
22
22
21
23
22
42*
5-MM
MAX.
11
16
5
7
6
2
9
16
6
13
34
6
1
3
5
5
8
9
7
40
-------
TABLE 3-40 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. OF (M
MAX. HRl
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MEAN
»YS
YMEAN
12
1
1
13
36
1
1
0
26
a
2
1
6
2
0
1
1
1
0
18
1
1
3
3
13
1
6
25
36
1
1
1
11
21
1
0
21
0
5
1
2
5
2
0
0
0
1
0
16
1
0
2
2
13
1
4
25
21
2
0
0
6
19
0
0
24
0
4
1
2
3
2
0
0
0
1
0
17
1
0
3
0
9
1
2
4
26
24
3
0
0
8
26
0
0
10
0
3
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
13
3
0
2
?
7
1
1
3
26
26
4
0
0
7
21
0
1
0
5
0
2
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
7
1
0
2
y
5
1
1
2
27
21
A
5
1
0
4
11
0
0
0
3
0
0
4
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
5
1
0
1
3
4
0
1
1
28
11
M
(
2
0
5
17
0
0
1
3
0
1
7
2
1
2
1
0
1
0
1
1
6
2
3
3
4
4
0
1
2
28
17
7
4
1
3
18
1
6
2
0
5
8
4
4
3
1
2
4
0
3
5
2
3
3
7
1
1
4
26
18
1
8
3
5
13
2
4
2
0
7
15
7
4
5
1
3
5
4
6
3
4
4
9
1
1
5
25
15
t
8
5
7
3
3
5
0
20
4
2
1
3
5
1
2
3
6
1
2
3
6
1
1
4
24
20
n
7
4
6
2
3
6
9
2
2
1
1
5
1
1
2
4
0
1
2
3
3
1
3
23
9
1!
8
3
4
7
2
2
10
5
1
1
0
1
5
1
1
2
i
0
1
2
2
3
1
3
24
10
12
9
2
2
7
2
2
8
1
2
2
1
9
0
1
7
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
3
26
9
1
9
1
1
5
0
1
£
4
1
1
1
1
6
0
2
1
1
1
1
0
1
2
1
2
1
2
2(S
9
2
2
1
1
1
5
4
3
6
1
6
0
1
1
3
0
1
0
3
3
1
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
2
22
6
4
7
2
1
8
1
1
3
0
3
2
1
1
4
0
2
?
1
1
0
0
4
2
1
2
2
25
8
P
s
4
1
1
U
1
2
1
4
1
6
Z
^
1
5
0
3
1
2
3
C
0
t.
3
2
2
2
26
11
M
(
3
2
2
10
I
2
3
1
5
3
2
2
7
0
2
1
1
1
3
0
1
4
3
5
1
3
3
26
10
7
4
3
6
12
2
2
4
3
3
4
2
1
9
0
2
1
1
1
3
1
3
4
3
4
3
2
3
26
12
1
3
12
16
10
2
3
5
4
3
4
1
2
8
0
1
1
1
1
8
2
2
2
3
5
6
2
4
?IS
16
*
2
15
31
3
4
6
3
3
2
1
4
8
0
1
1
1
1
14
1
2
2
3
5
2
5
24
31
It
1
21
32
2
4
13
4
1
1
5
3
0
I
1
1
1
12
1
3
3
3
3
2
5
23
32
11
2
16
34
1
2
19
6
1
1
5
2
0
1
1
1
0
15
1
1
2
3
1
2
5
23
34
DMLY
MEM
3.9
4.1
9.3
14.2
0.8
1.7
3.3
8.0
1.0
3.0
*.8
1.8
1.8
4.6
0.7
1.2
2.0
0.8
1.0
3.3
4.9
1.3
1.9
2.5
• 0
*.5
1.7
1.3
3.3
NO.
Of HI
23
23
22
18
17
19
23
17
13
16
23
23
23
20
22
23
19
22
21
23
23
23
22
24
2*
21
19
C.OC,
MWN
MAX.
20
25
38
37
3
5
22
31
5
7
23
7
19
18
2
4
7
2
2
20
20
4
5
4
9
15
7
3
-------
TABLE 3-41 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEM
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
2
1
1
0
15
U
2
1
0
4
1
3
1
1
5
1
0
0
0
10
0
1
1
1
0
12
0
1
2
3
29
15
1
2
2
1
0
14
16
1
1
0
2
1
6
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
9
0
1
0
1
0
14
0
1
2
3
29
16
2
3
2
1
0
U
13
1
1
0
1
1
5
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
1
2
13
0
0
2
3
29
16
3
3
1
1
I
25
10
1
2
0
1
J
4
1
2
3
1
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
1
8
15
0
0
2
3
29
25
4
f.
1
1
I
26
15
1
2
0
1
11
2
0
3
3
0
0
0
. 0
3
0
0
0
1
7
16
0
0
1
3
29
26
5
7
I
1
I
21
10
1
2
0
1
11
1
0
3
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
9
15
0
0
2
3
29
21
6
13
7
22
2 3
2
1
15
9
1
2
2
2
16
1
0
4
2
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
10
16
0
0
2
4
29
16
4
1
1 5
5
6
5
<«
5
IB
1
0
8
5
1
3
4
0
1
3
0
4
3
16
15
0
4
5
28
18
9
B
3
1
1
8
3
5
3
4
4
1
0
5
1
2
0
1
3
0
1
7
4
0
3
3
24
8
10
11
1 1
0 0
2 2
1
5
2
4
3
2
2
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
2
2
0
3
1
24
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
24
3
P M
12
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
25
1
1 2
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
24
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
23
2
4
1
1
0
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
1
28
4
s
1
1
0
0
1
11
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
5
1
1
28
11
(
1
0
0
1
12
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
6
1
1
27
12
7
2
0
1
2
17
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
3
1
1
27
17
1
2
0
6
3
12
0
2
1
0
0
0
3
2
0
2
1
7
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
3
1
2
27
12
»
3
0
16
3
6
0
5
3
1
0
1
7
1
0
2
0
9
a
2
i
2
0
4
0
1
2
1
3
27
16
M
3
2
0
17
5
3
0
8
2
3
1
1
6
2
0
1
0
9
1
3
1
Z
1
4
0
1
3
1
3
28
17
U
2
1
0
14
3
2
0
9
1
6
1
1
7
2
0
1
0
10
0
2
1
1
1
5
0
. 1
2
1
3
28
14
DAIY
MEM
4.4
1.6
0.7
0.9
10.6
5.8
4.7
1.2
2.1
1.6
4.7
1.4
0.3
2.8
2.5
0.4
0.6
0.7
1.6
2.0
1.1
0.4
1.0
0.9
4.2
6.1
0.2
2.1
1.3
NO.
OFW
22
20
23
13
22
22
20
23
23
23
21
22
23
23
18
23
22
23
23
22
21
23
22
23
23
23
22
21
17
5-MW
MAX.
25
5
4
2
26
17
22
5
10
6
20
7
1
9
6
2
3
4
13
11
4
1
4
4
20
20
1
6
2
2.3
626
-------
TABLE 3-42 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (color!metric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HRLV MEAN
A M
12
0
18
12
12
7
0
3
6
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
0
1
0
8
1
2
1
16
2
0
1
I
7
10
4
31
18
1
0
14
12
9
10
0
2
3
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
4
0
2
0
7
1
3
1
16
1
0
1
1
2
11
3
31
16
2
0
11
11
11
7
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
4
0
2
0
12
1
8
0
10
1
0
0
1
2
10
3
31
12
3
0
11
10
13
4
0
4
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
2
0
2
0
6
1
6
0
7
1
0
0
2
1
8
3
31
13
4
0
9
12
12
3
0
6
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
6
2
5
0
5
1
0
1
2
1
6
2
31
12
5
0
9
15
10
2
0
8
Q
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
7
2
4
0
2
0
0
1
2
1
6
2
31
15
C
2
15
11
12
3
1
11
2
1
2
0
0
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
7
4
5
1
2
0
I
2
3
I
4
3
31
15
7
3
12
15
9
6
2
16
2
2
1
1
1
6
3
3
3
4
1
1
2
9
5
6
2
2
0
2
3
3
1
3
4
31
16
1
3
6
17
6
5
3
12
2
2
1
1
0
13
3
3
2
4
1
1
3
6
3
4
2
1
0
2
4
2
1
2
4
31
17
»
2
3
11
3
3
5
1
2
1
2
0
14
3
2
1
2
1
0
2
2
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
2
27
14
11
2
2
4
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
10
2
1
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
I
0
2
3
1
1
1
2
28
10
11
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
5
2
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
I
1
0
2
3
1
1
0
1
27
5
12
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
3
2
2
0
4
1
0
1
1
1
I
1
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
29
4
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
7
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
31
7
r M
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
. 1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
27
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
3
1
0
1
1
29
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
6
1
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
4
1
1
1
1
31
6
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
31
4
i
i
i
0
i
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
0
1
1
31
4
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
0
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
/
0
2
1
2
2
4
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
31
4
»
10
8
3
2
0
3
3
2
0
1
1
1
1
5
2
6
1
2
0
5
1
2
2
6
2
1
2
3
3
2
3
3
31
10
11
15
12
3
2
3
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
9
1
2
0
6
1
2
2
8
1
1
1
2
2
5
14
4
30
15
11
19
13
9
5
3
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
12
0
1
0
7
1
2
1
15
2
0
1
2
8
4
23
5
30
23
QM.Y
MEM
2.7
6.6
6.4
4.8
2.5
1.1
4.1
1.5
0.7
0.8
1.1
0.7
3.7
2.0
1.7
2.0
2.0
0.7
0.6
1.7
3.9
1.7
2.6
2.1
3.2
0.5
1.2
2.1
1.8
1.7
4.5
NO.
or HI
23
23
23
23
20
20
22
23
21
23
23
23
23
22
23
23
21
23
22
23
19
21
23
23
23
22
23
22
23
23
23
S4MN
MAX
21
18
ie
17
u
4
17
7
3
2
2
2
16
10
4
14
10
4
2
8
13
5
9
18
20
2
4
6
13
13
27
2.3
692
-------
TABLE 3-43 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FPI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRIY MEAN
A M
12
22
13
10
2
1
3
3
8
1
0
1
1
a
2
9
11
1
2
17
13
16
13
7
6
7
24
22
1
22
12
8
1
1
3
4
7
1
0
1
1
5
3
10
9
1
2
16
3
10
10
5
3
6
24
22
2
16
12
5
1
1
2
4
6
1
0
0
1
5
3
10
8
1
2
18
10
11
7
5
5
5
24
18
3
8
14
5
1
0
2
4
7
1
0
0
1
7
3
10
6
1
I
17
14
10
8
5
4
5
24
17
4
16
14
6
1
0
2
3
6
1
0
1
1
6
3
10
7
2
1
14
13
10
12
8
5
6
24
16
5
16
16
6
1
1
5
2
6
0
0
1
1
3
3
11
7
2
1
15
12
9
14
10
5
6
24
16
6
17
7
11
14 . 7
6
3
2
7
<,
ft
1
2
2
2
7
7
16
16
2
2
17
10
16
17
12
10
8
24
17
6
3
3
6
7
4
1
2
4
3
2
8
24
17
2
3
14
6
15
16
14
11
8
24
24
t
4
5
5
3
2
3
-------
TABLE 3-44 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
A
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HftlY MEAN
A M
12
I
2
0
0
9
14
I
1
3
4
I
2
0
i
'-t
3
^
\
l
2
3
2
2
9
3
24
U
1
5
1
0
0
0
4
12
1
1
1
2
1
i
0
2
3
3
6
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
2
25
12
2
7
1
0
0
0
5
7
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
3
A
5
1
1
1
3
1
2
7
2
25
7
3
7
1
0
0
0
3
7
1
1
1
2
1
2
0
2
3
3
4
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
2
25
7
4
10
1
0
0
0
5
•i
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
3
3
4
1
2
1
3
1
2
3
2
25
10
5
V
l
1
0
1
b
c
1
I
1
2
1
1
0
1
3
3
4
1
2
3
1
1
4
1
2
25
7
6
5
1
1
1
7
<»
4
1
2
4
3
2
2
0
c!
4
4
4
2
3
3
1
4
a
2
2
25
9
7
3
1
2
4
7
13
5
1
4
5
3
3
3
1
2
6
7
5
2
3
4
1
4
10
3
4
25
13
8
3
1
<•"
4
12
fi
1
4
3
3
3
b
l
2
4
6
4
3
2
2
1
2
6
4
3
24
12
9
4
1
2
1
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
2
3
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
25
4
10
4
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
C
2
0
1
21
4
11
2
1
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
22
2
P M
12
3
1
0
0
0
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
25
3
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
25
2
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
25
2
4 ! 5
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
I
1
2
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
26
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
2
2
1
0
I
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
0
1
0
1
1
26
3
6
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
0
0
1
26
4
7
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
]
1
1
1
?
I.)
I
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
0
1
1
26
3
8
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
1
1
0
1
1
26
5
9
i
2
1
2
1
3
3
I
2
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
2
3
1
2
3
2
1
1
4
1
2
26
4
10
1
2
1
1
7
6
1
1
7
4
2
1
0
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
1
1
9
1
3
25
9
11
I
<•»
0
I
B
9
1
I
b
4
3
2
0
1
4
3
4
1
2
2
3
1
2
11
1
3
25
U
DAILY
MEAN
3.2
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.7
3.8
2.1
3.7
0.7
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.*
1.0
0.5
1.4
2.3
2.9
2.5
1.2
2.0
1.5
1.2
1.5
2.9
1.8
NO.
Of HO
22
22
20
23
22
21
14
23
23
19
22
23
23
23
23
23
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
21
23
23
5-MIN
MAX.
12
6
4
6
9
17
11
18
2
9
10
5
4
3
2
4
6
9
7
4
9
4
4
6
12
10
1.9
572
-------
TABLE 3-45 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
•o.oFDi
MAX.HM.
OF
NEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
S(|N
MON
TUE
wp
THU
FBI
SAT
SON
MpN
TVE
WED
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
wp
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
wp
THU
FRI
SAT
UCAM
»YS
YMEAN
12
1
3
2
1
1
1
4
3
11
I
I
I
•3
8
1
1
0
2
16
14
7
7
1
8
9
25
16
1
1
2
1
2
0
1
6
5
11
0
1
1
4
9
1
1
0
1
13
15
7
6
1
8
10
25
15
2
1
4
2
1
1
5
3
17
0
1
1
3
7
1
1
0
1
12
15
6
7
1
5
10
24
17
3
l
3
1
0
1
5
1
U
0
1
3
9
1
1
1
0
13
15
6
8
1
5
10
23
15
1
5
1
0
1
5
0
12
0
1
4
11
1
1
0
1
13
14
5
8
1
3
8
23
14
A
A
5
1
1
1
6
1
13
4
1
5
7
0
1
0
1
13
12
5
7
0
3
7
23
13
H
2
7
1
3
3
9
1
13
3
2
10
10
1
1
0
2
16
18
9
6
0
5
4
23
18
2
13
1
6
5
12
1
12
2
3
11
13
1
1
1
3
20
26
17
7
0
6
4
23
26
2
9
1
5
3
4
1
7
2
4
5
11
1
1
2
4
23
25
12
4
1
5
3
23
25
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
4
0
0
1
3
19
12
5
2
1
6
2
22
19
M
1
2
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
5
6
2
1
1
3
1
1
22
6
11
1
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
23
2
12
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
2
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
25
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
2
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
25
4
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
23
3
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
3
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
24
3
P
1
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
3
0
2
1
1
&
0
4
3
1
1
1
0
1
1
24
4
•
1 :
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
5
2
0
1
1
0
1
23
5
7
1
1
0
0 ,
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
24
3
1
2
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
3
1
3
2
1
1
2
1
24
3
»
2
1
0
2
1
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
0
3
7
7
5
6
2
4
24
7
U
3
1
1
2
0
1
6
1
9
1
1
1
5
4
2
1
1
2
14
10
6
9
1
12
4
24
14
U
2
1
1
1
0
1
5
4
13
2
1
1
4
7
1
1
0
2
15
9
7
7
1
12
4
24
IS
DMU
KM
1.3
2.9
0.6
0.9
1.3
0.6
1.6
3.0
1.8
5.2
1.3
0.6
1.8
3.1
4.5
0.6
0.5
1.9
3.3
8.6
8.6
*.7
3.2
0.7
4.1
4.6
«'
HO.
Of «
23
23
23
14
22
14
23
23
23
22
18
16
23
23
23
23
23
21
21
23
23
23
23
15
14
23
545
CJMM
•ML
4
15
3
3
7
2
8
13
14
18
5
1
6
13
16
2
1
6
16
24
28
18
8
2
9
14
-------
TABLE 3-46 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
•ORTN.Y HEAR
M. OF DAYS
MAX. HW.Y MEAN
A M
12
12
18
1
3
2
3
10
9
5
12
1
1
3
1
1
1
9
10
11
6
19
18
1
11
13
2
3
2
2
8
7
4
9
1
0
2
1
0
19
10
8
6
18
19
2
10
11
2
3
2
ft
a
6
5
8
1
0
I
2
0
25
7
8
6
18
25
3
12
12
2
3
2
5
8
5
3
7
1
1
0
1
3
0
0
21
7
7
5
20
21
4
10
10
1
3
2
5
8
6
3
6
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
20
a
7
r 5
20
20
5
9
11
2
2
2
4
7
5
5
7
0
1
1
0
0
0
21
8
8
5
19
21
6
9
7
9
13 8
2
2
2
5
7
5
3
11
7
2
2
0
0
I
19
12
12
6
19
19
2
3
4
9
9
3
13
18
7
3
4
0
1
7
23
18
18
8
19
23
I
7
5
2
3
5
11
8
2
18
16
5
3
4
0
4
10
15
20
19
8
19
20
9
4
2
2
5
7
3
1
8
3
2
0
6
5
9
17
13
5
16
17
10
1
11
1
2
1 1
2
3
4
1
1
3
2
2
4
2
6
10
5
15
10
1
2
2
1
0
1
1
2
1
2
1
14
2
P II
12
I
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
15
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
13
2
2
0
1
0
3
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
0
0
0
14
4
4
1
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
3
4
1
0
1
1
1
16
4
S
1
1
3
1
2
0
0
0
1
1
2
5
3
0
0
1
3
1
1
1
19
5
(
1
1
3
1
2
0
1
1
1
2
3
1
0
1
5
3
2
2
17
5
7
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
0
3
3
3
1
1
5
4
8
4
3
17
8
1
2
2
3
1
3
5
3
1
4
4
3
4
1
3
4
12
3
16
12
J
9
2i
3
1 ;
3
7
5
1
12
1
2
3
?.
5
1
4
8
6
4
18
12
M
15 !
2
4
1
3
9
5
1
14
1
2
3
2
6
1
2
8
12
6
5
19
15
11
18
2
4
2
3
10
7
2
12
1
3
3
2
1
8
10
4
5
17
ia
OMU
KM
6.6
5.6
2.2
l.S
2.4
4.3
*.3
2.6
5.7
5.7
2.3
2.6
1.5
2.0
0.7
1.3
2.3
13.7
9.1
7.0
•0.
OF Hi
22
21
23
23
23
22
23
21
22
18
22
19
15
16
13
18
22
16
19
20
MM
ML
19
20
4
4
5
12
11
10
20
22
13
6
4
7
3
6
11
25
21
20
4.2
398
-------
TABLE 3-47 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NIIRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1963
DAY
IKMTN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. Of D
MM. Ml
OF
MEEK
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SPN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
6
5
18
7
7
0
4
1
1
17
17
12
14
12
17
12
11
11
7
1
1
3
8
22
IB
1
6
4
14
6
4
1
1
0
1
16
13
l<3
11
11
15
12
9
10
5
2
2
3
7
22
16
2
6
10
5
5
1
0
0
1
14
12
8
10
9
14
8
11
10
4
2
1
3
6
21
14
5
1
8
4
3
0
0
0
1
10
7
7
9
9
13
7
8
9
3
2
1
2
5
22
13
5
2
7
4
3
0
0
0
12
7
6
8
7
11
8
6
8
3
2
1
3
5
21
12
A
5
2
6
3
2
0
0
0
12
8
7
7
7
10
7
7
6
3
2
1
3
5
21
12
M
3
5
4
2
5
1
1
1
14
17
10
10
10
10
8
8
8
4
3
1
6
6
21
17
5
7
3
2
5
3
5
2
20
17
18
15
16
15
9
13
9
5
3
9
9
20
20
4
7
7
6
3
2
1
23
19
17
20
23
12
6
15
9
6
4
11
7
10
20
23
2
6
9
4
3
2
2
1
10
8
15
15
7
4
14
7
2
2
10
6
6
20
15
N
1
3
4
4
1
1
1
3
4
11
8
5
2
5
2
1
2
6
3
3
19
11
11
1 i
2
2
2
0
1
0
1
1
1
3
8
3
1
3
0
0
2
4
5
2
20
8
12
1
2
I
I
0
1
1
0
•0
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
4
2
1
21
4
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
3
2
1
22
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
I
1
0
1
2
2
4
1
18
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
1
2
2
6
1
22
6
P
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
1
0
2
3
2
6
2
3
2
0
1
2
3
7
2
22
7
M
1
1
2
2
0
3
4
0
1
5
5
5
9
14
3
3
3
1
2
1
4
10
3
22
14
1 ,
3!
9
2
0
5
6
1
2
18
12
13
17
23
7
3
4
0
2
0
4
8
6
22
23
1
12
13
1
0
5
7
3
2
22
17
13
17
29
26
3
4
1
2
0
5
6
9
22
29
1
15
11
2
0
6
1
6
22
15
10
15
22
47
9
7
1
2
0
5
13
10
21
47
M
1
18
10
5
0
3
1
13
17
17
14
17
25
50
11
11
3
2
1
4
10
11
21
50
11
1
19
9
9
0
3
2
16
25
14
12
13
21
29
11
13
7
2
2
4
2
10
21
29
OM.Y
MUM
2.5
4.9
6.3
3.3
1.9
1.7
2.1
0.6
2.8
12.9
9.6
7.8
H.l
12.6
13.0
5.7
6.9
*.5
2.2
1.9
2.5
4,9
6.0
5.6
NO.
Of M
23
23
22
22
23
18
23
23
16
19
22
23
20
22
23
23
23
23
21
20
23
14
15
484
S4MN
MM.
7
19
18
12
8
6
8
3
17
26
26
21
22
32
54
16
18
13
9
7
6
12
16
-------
TABLE 3-48 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
MRTHt'
M.oro
MAX. Ml
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
RRI
SAT
KM
AYS
YKM
12
1
3
0
1
2
10
16
2
1
3
2
I
8
2
2
3
1
2
1 n
1
1
4
24
16
1
1
2
0
1
2
12
12
2
1
3
3
0
13
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
4
24
13
2
1
5
0
1
1
9
10
3
2
2
2
0
7
1
1
3
0
3
1
1
3
24
10
3
1
4
0
1
1
10
9
3
1
2
1
0
6
1
2
2
1
3
1
1
3
24
10
4
1
3
0
1
1
7
8
3
1
1
I
0
6
1
2
2
0
3
1
1
2
24
8
A
5
2
4
0
1
2
8
8
4
1
1
1
0
7
1
4
2
0
3
1
1
3
24
8
M
6
3
5
1
i
2
3
11
7
6
2
1
1
1
13
5
5
4
0
3
2
1
4
24
13
7
5
8
2
3
4
12
7
7
4
1
1
1
23
8
9
9
1
5
2
1
5
24
23
1
4
13
3
3
4
13
5
7
4
3
1
2
25
10
9
9
1
3
2
2
6
24
25
9
3
11
3
2
4
12
5
3
3
1
15
10
9
8
1
3
6
2
2
5
22
15
10
2
5
2
3
10
4
4
1
14
8
8
1
3
4
3
2
5
20
14
11
2
4
2
2
8
4
2
4
1
2
11
5
7
2
2
3
3
3
4
22
11
12
3
5
I
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
3
7
4
3
4
2
3
3
2
3
3
24
7
1
3
5
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
0
3
5
4
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
24
5
I
3
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
9
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
23
9
4
3
5
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
10
4
4
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
24
10
r
s
4
6
5
4
4
1
2
2
4
1
12
4
5
2
2
2
6
2
2
4
23
12
M
1
3
4
5
7
6
3
2
3
4
1
0
12
3
3
2
2
5
7
1
2
4
24
12
7
4 '
2
3
5
9
4
7
2
2
2
2
7
10
2
4
2
2
14
7
1
2
4
25
14
1
3
2
2
4
14
3
7
1
1
3
1
8
7
3
3
2
2
17
8
2
3
4
25
17
I
3
1
2
4
12
8
7
2
2
2
1
7
5
3
4
1
2
17
6
9
1
2
4
25
17
M
4
1
2
3
10
12
5
2
2
2
1
9
3
3
5
1
2
11
9
i
2
4
25
12
11
3
1
3
3
9
13
2
1
2
2
1
9
2
3
5
2
2
15
7
i
2
2
4
25
15
DM.V
KM
2.6
4.2
2.4
1 1
2.4
4.4
7.8
6.0
2.7
1.9
L. 3
2.3
1.1
2.9
9.9
3.7
4.1
3.5
1.3
5.3
5.5
L. 0
1.7
1.8
3.7
•0.
9m
23
15
23
?•*
23
23
23
22
21
21
77
23
23
20
23
23
21
23
23
23
14
7 *
23
23
5*7
MM
ML
7
15
7
6
20
14
19
9
6
5
3
12
28
12
12
10
3
19
12
i y
4
3
-------
TABLE 3-49 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITRIC OXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHU
HO.Of D
u>w t|M
MM. MR
OF
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PR)
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MEAN
AYS
u MCAH
YMAN
12
2
1
2
2
1
3
-------
TABLE 3-50 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1962
DAY
MONTH
I
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Mommy
no. of ft
MX. Ml
OF
WEEK
WON
TVE
WED
THU
FPI
CAT
sgN
MpN
TVE
WED
THU
FPI
SAT
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FPI
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
•FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MEAN
»YS
I MUM
12
3
3
3
7
3
•3
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
16
1
2
2
3
7
3
5
1
?
1
1
2
2
3
16
2
1
2
2
7
3
it
1
?
1
0
2
2
3
16
3
I
2
2
6
3
4
0
1
1
1
2
2
2
16
4
1
2
6
3
3
0
1
1
1
2
Z
2
16
A
S
2
2
1
4
3
3
0
1
I
1
2
2
2
16
M
(
1
1
1
4
4
2
1
1
1
0
3
2
2
17
7
1
1
1
4
4
2
1
1
0
3
2
2
16
1
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
0
3
2
15
»
1
1
5
2
2
1
2
0
3
14
!•
1
1
4
2
2
1
2
0
13
11
2
3
2
1
2
0
11
12
1
3
2
1
1
0
12
1
3
3
2
1
1
0
2
13
2
0
1
3
2
1
1
2
9
4
^
5.
2
2
1
1
3
9
r
5
5
3
4
2
2
2
1
2
3
13
M
(
5
3
5
3
2
2
1
2
3
13
7
5
3
5
3
2
2
1
2
3
13
8
4
3
5
3
2
2
1
2
3
12
9
6
7
3
5
3
2
2
1
2
3
13
7
10
5
7
3
5
5
3
2
1
1
2
3
13
7
n
4
7
3
5
5
5
3
2
1
1
2
3
13
7
DAILY
MEAN
1.5
3.2
? »
3.4
4 1
3.9
3.8
4.8
4.0
4 Q
2.8
I.*
1.4
1.2
0,4
2.3
2.3
NO
Of Ht
14
15
1 A
i 7
22
18
21
23
15
17
23
18
23
23
14
17
20
316
5-MIN
MAX.
5
7
^
5
8
7
5
6
5
7
5
3
3
2
1
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-51 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1962
DAY
MMTM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MOMTHL
•0. Of 1
MAIM
OF
•EEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MQN
TIIF
WBD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WF.D
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
YMEAN
MVS
LVNEJW
12
^
4
3
5
1
1
2
1
5
2
1
3
3
1
3
1
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
23
5
1
3
3
3
4
1
1
2
1
5
2
1
2
2
1
2
0
2
1
1
2
2
3
2
23
5
2
3
3
3
4
1
1
2
1
5
2
I
2
2
1
2
0
2
1
I
2
2
2
£
23
5
3
3
2
3
4
1
1
2
1
6
2
1
?
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
23
6
4
3
2
3
3
I
2
2
1
4
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
2
23
4
A
5
3
2
3
3
2
1
2
1
4
3
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
3
1
2
2
23
4
M
i
3
2
3
3
2
2
1
4
2
1
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
1
3
1
2
2
22
4
7
3
4
3
4
2
3
1
3
2
7
2
2
2
?
2
1
2
?
1
4
1
2
2
22
4
1
3
4
3
4
2
3
2
3
2
5
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
-------
TABLE 3-52 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1962
DAY
•OHTN
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
29
30
31
•MTMV
•Lorn
•HIM.
OF
m
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN !
MON '
TUE
WCD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
TUE
WED
THU
SAT
sgN
WED
FRI
SAT
HEAD
ITS
THEM
12
2
2
3
5
3
5
3
4
t
j INI rj in
5
4
6
9
4
3
3
3
5
3
4
4
3
3
31
9
1
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
4
2
2
5
4
3
6
3
2
3
3
4
3
4
3
1
3
31
8
1
1
3
4
3
4
3
4
2
1
5
3
6
3
2
3
3
5
2
4
3
2
3
31
7
1
1
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
1
3
4
4
6
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
1
2
31
7
U) IP IX l\» f>
4
3
3
2
1
3
4
4
6
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
1
2
31
6
A
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
3
5
4
6
3
4
2
4
2
3
3
1
2
3
30
6
M
2
3
2
5
5
3
2
2
4
5
4
6
6
5
3
3
2
3
3
3
30
6
3
2
3
2
5
5
3
3
2
5
4
4
6
6
5
4
4
2
4
6
3
4
30
8
3
2
3
2
5
7
3
4
3
5
5
5
6
6
5
4
5
2
4
3
4
30
8
3
2
2
2
5
7
3
5
3
5
5
4
6
6
5
4
6
2
3
3
29
9
M
3
1
2
4
2
7
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
6
3
4
2
3
3
3
26
7
11
3
2
3
4
3
6
4
3
4
4
4
3
3
5
3
3
2
4
3
3
4
27
6
12
2
3
4
3
5
4
4
3
6
4
4
3
3
4
3
2
2
4
3
3
4
27
6
1
2
2
3
4
3
5
4
4
» m in in
4
3
2
4
3
2
2
5
2
3
4
27
5
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
3
5
3
5
3
3
4
3
4
2
4
2
4
3
3
4
26
6
4
4
3
4
3
3
4
5
4
5
4
4
7
3
4
2
5
4
3
3
5
3
4
28
7
r
$
3
4
4
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
7 .
4
5
3
6
5
3
3
5
4
4
30
7
M
C
3
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
6
4
5
3
6
6
4
3
3
5
3
4
4
31
6
7
3
5
5
5
6
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
6
5
5
4
4
3
5
5
4
5
31
6
1
3
5
5
4
5
5
3
3
4
4
3
5
8
5
5
3
5
4
5
3
4
31
8
1
3
5
5
4
7
5
4
2
2
4
4
4 .
5
8
5
5
3
4
4
4
3
3
31
8
It
3
5
4
4
4
4
3
2
5
6
4
6
8
4
5
3
3
4
4
3
3
31
8
11
3
5
3
_
3
2
2
2
6
6
4
6
9
4
4
4
3
3
5
3
3
31
9
MAY
mm
2.2
4)0
3.2
L, 0
4 2
4.3
4.6
3.8
3 5
2.9
3.4
4.7
4.1
4.2
5.2
4.6
4.1
3.3
3.6
2.5
t**
L. 2
4.2
2.7
3.4
^ B
•0.
OF Ml
23
23
18
23
23
23
19
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
16
23
1 O
23
22
y \
21
23
23
681
HM
ML
3
5
5
5
7
6
7
6
5
5
6
6
10
5
6
10
8
6
5
7
6
4
7
6
5
5
-------
TABLE 3-53 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1962
• AY
mam
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MRM.1
•O.OFO
MM um
OF
WOK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON '
TUE
WID
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WID
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TVE
THU
SAT
SUN
MON
'mm
m
V MT Ml
12
3
3
4
5
6
3
4
2
1
4
2
4
3
6
6
1
1
A
2
1
4
3
22
1
3
3
4
5
5
2
4
1
2
3
2
4
3
6
5
0
1
2
1
4
3
22
2
3
3
3
c.
6
2
3
1
1
3
2
4
2
5
5
0
2
2
1
2
3
22
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
2
1
1
3
1
4
3
4
3
0
2
1
1
2
3
22
4
3
3
4
4
5
3
2
0
1
4
1
3
2
4
2
0
1
0
1
2
2
22
A
S
3
3
3
4
5
3
2
1
1
4
2
3
2
4
2
0
2
0
1
2
2
22
M
C
3
3
4
5
6
4
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
5
3
0
2
1
1
3
3
22
7
3
3
4
5
6
4
2
2
2
4
2
3
3
6
3
1
3
1
1
3
3
22
1
3
3
4
6
6
4
2
2
2
3
1
3
3
5
2
0
4
2
1
3
3
22
9
3
3
5
6
6
3
2
2
3
1
3
3
4
2
1
3
1
1
2
3
21
11
3
3
4
5
5
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
21
11
4
3
4
4
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
0
1
1
2
2
19
12
3
2
4
3
5
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
0
1
1
1
2
18
1
2
3
4
3
5
4
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
2
18
2
3
3
2
3
4
5
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
1
2
17
4
3
3
3
4
5
4
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
2
i
1
1
2
2
21
f
S
2
3
4
6
5
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
4
1
0
2
2
2
2
3
21
II
(
3
3
4
4!
4
5
2
5
3
3
2
2
3
S
1
0
2
2
2
2
3
21
7
3
3
5
5
4
4
4
5
2
2
2
2
3
4
7
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
22
1
3
4
6
6
4
4
5
5
2
3
3
3
3
6
7
1
1
4
2
4
3
4
22
»
3
4
6
7
3
4
4
4
2
4
4
3
3
6
6
2
2
4
2
5
3
4
22
M
4
6
7
3
„
5
3
4
4
2
3
3
6
5
2
2
4
1
4
4
4
22
11
4
4
6
7
3
4
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
6
6
1
1
4
1
5
4
4
22
ONLY
•EM
3.0
3.1
4.2
4.8
4.9
3.6
3.3
2.9
1.8
2.2
2.8
2.0
3.0
r- CM m •* *•
* • • *
^ CM O IM 0
1.3
1.8
•2.6
2.9
•0.
OF*
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
19
19
23
23
20
23
m IM ** o c
IM CM IM CM r>
23
22
23
48
MM
•ML
4
S
6
8
7
5
5
6
3
4
5
4
4
7
8
6
2
5
3
5
3
J
-------
TABLE 3-54 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI. MAY 1962
DAY
•am
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
mWTMV
H0.0ftt
MX. Ml
OF
•OR
TUE
WfO
THU
FFI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WFD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TOE
W?0
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FUI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MF1M
ITS
rmw
12
3
1
4
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
4
5
5
2
5
9
6
5
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
26
9
1
2
0
4
5
5
4
2
4
2
1
3
5
5
2
5
7
7
7
3
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
26
7
2
1
1
3
4
5
3
?
4
?
1
4
6
2
4
7
6
6
2
3
1
1
1
2
2
1
25
7
3
1
I
3
4
5
3
2
4
1
1
4
4
2
4
6
5
6
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
25
6
2
2
2
3
5
3
3
2
I
1
4
3
2
4
6
5
6
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
25
6
A
2
1
3
3
4
4
3
4
1
2
4
3
3
4
6
4
5
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
25
6
H
3
2
3
4
4
3
3
5
2
2
5
3
4
5
7
6
6
2
3
3
1
1
1
0
1
25
7
3
2
4
5
5
3
3
5
3
3
6
4
3
10
12
9
7
2
3
3
1
2
1
0
2
25
12
3
3
3
8
6
3
3
5
3
3
10
4
4
?1
21
10
10
4
4
2
1
4
2
1
2
25
21
2
2
3
13
2
2
5
2
3
7
4
3
14
23
7
7
4
4
1
1
2
3
1
2
25
23
•
2
3
7
3
2
1
4
2
2
4
3
1
3
3
10
5
4
1
4
2
1
2
2
1
2
25
10
11
2
2
2
2
2
1
4
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
4
5
3
1
2
1
0
2
2
1
2
26
5
D
3
2
2
2 '
2
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
3
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
27
3
1
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
3
2
3
2
1
1
I
1
3
2
2
2
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
27
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
5
2
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
5
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
27
5
4
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
5
3
1
1
3
2
3
3
2
1
5
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
27
5
f
s
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
5
4
2
2
4
3
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
2
2
27
5
•
•
2
5
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
5
4
3
2
5
2
3
2
3
3
0
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
27
5
7
3
5
4
5
5
4
4
3
4
5
4
3
5
3
4
5
3
3
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
27
5
•
4
5 |
6
4
6
4
5
3
4
7
5
4
5
8
7
5
3
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
26
8
»
4 '
5
5
5
6
4
4
3
5
8
7
6
5
7
6
6
4
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
26
8
N
3
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
5
8
6
4
6
8
8
5
4
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
26
8
11
1
4
5
6
3
3
4
2
5
6
6
3
6
8
7
5
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
26
8
ONLY
KM
2.5
2.5
3.*
4.4
3.*
2.4
3.6
2.*
3.1
4.6
3.7
2.7
2.7
3.6
6.0
7.2
5.6
*.7
2.5
2.7
2.4
1.3
1.1
2.2
1.9
1.4
1.6
a 2
HO.
OFM
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
15
19
13
22
23
14
22
14
23
19
23
23
23
23
23
23
596
S-MM
HAL
4
5
7
16
7
5
6
5
6
12
7
7
7
7
24
26
11
10
6
6
5
3
3
5
3
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-55 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (cplorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1962
DAY
•Mmi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
MTMU
M.OFB
MAX. Ml
OF
MEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
M0N
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
MQN
TgE
WED
THU
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WfD
THU
ctoi
™"
SAT
SUN
TUE
WED
TUII
FRI
SAT
rKM
AW
YHEM
12
2
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
0
4
3
7
2
3
6
26
7
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
4
2
2
2
2
4
3
5
1
3
3
7
1
2
5
3
26
7
2
2
0
0
1
0
2
4
1
3
3
2
3
3
4
1
3
3
6
1
3
5
3
26
6
3
1
1
0
0
1
3
1
3
1
2
3
2
4
1
i
4
3
6
1
3
4
2
26
6
4
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
2
1
2
4
2
4
0
3
2
5
1
3
4
2
26
5
A
5
1
1
0
0
0
2
3
2
2
1
2
4
1
3
1
3
2
5
2
3
4
2
26
5
M
6
1
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
4
3
0
4
1
4
3
5
3
4
4
3
26
5
7
1
1
1
1
0
4
4
3
2
2
5
5
0
6
1
5
3
6
3
5
6
3
26
7
I
1
2
1
1
4
4
3
2
5
5
10
1
4
4
9
4
6
7
4
24
U
9
1
1
1
1
3
2
4
2
2
3
10
0
3
3
7
4
4
5
3
22
11
11
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
1
0
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
23
4
11
1
0
1
2
2
4
5
2
1
1
1
0
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
24
5
U
1
0
1
2
2
3
4
2
1
1
0
0
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
24
4
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
26
3
1
0
0
0
2
3
2
4
6
2
3
1
0
1
0
2
1
4
2
3
2
2
26
6
1
o :
4
3
2
4
5
2
3
1
0
2
1
2
2
4
2
4
2
2
25
5
P
1
0
0
3
i
4
3
2
3
1
0
3
1
2
4
4
3
4
2
2
25
4
•
1
0
0
2
3
1
3
3
2
3
2
1
1
0
3
4
3
2
4
3
2
25
4
7
x
1 •
0
0
3
3
4
3
3
4
2
2
1
0
3
4
4
2
3
4
3
25
4
1
1
0
0
3
3
3
2
2
4
4
3
1
1
3
4
6
3
4
4
3
25
6
t
1
1
0
4
4
3
3
2
5
5
4
1
2
3
4
6
4
6
5
4
25
6
M
1
1
0
4
3
3
2
3
5
5
6
2
2
2
5
5
5
6
6
4
2*
6
11
1
1
0
4
2
3
2
3
4
4
6
1
3
3
4
3
6
6
7
3
25
7
DALY
•EAR
1.0
0.8
0,4
0.6
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.0
3.0
3 A
»o
3.0
1.8
3.4
0.8
31
.»
3.0
2.9
L. ^
H»3
*.8
2.6
3i
«o
3.7
4.0
2.6
M).
OF Hi
15
23
20
23
23
y*
23
23
20
23
23
y»
23
21
20
23
ya
23
23
23
23
77
23
23
577
MM
•AX.
2
2
1
6
4
5
5
7
6
7
6
7
12
3
5
6
12
6
7
8
-------
TABLE 3-56 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO.OFO
OF
KEEK
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
wifo
THU
mi
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WHO
THU
fv
SAT
SUN
WON
WED
THU
FRI
CAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MEM
ITS
12
6
3
4
4
3
5
4
2
4
4
3
3
0
4
4
3
2
4
4
4
4
3
23
1
6
2
2
3
2
4
3
1
3
4
2
3
0
3
3
4
1
4
2
4
3
3
23
2
5
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
3
4
2
3
0
3
1
4
1
3
2
3
3
3
23
3
4
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
3
3
2
2
0
2
2
3
1
3
1
2
3
2
23
4
4
3
3
2
1
2
3
3
1
3
3
3
2
0
2
2
2
1
3
i
3
2
2
23
4
A
S
3
3
I
2
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
2
0
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
23
M
6
3
3
2
3
3
4
2
1
4
4
4
2
0
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
23
1
',
3
1
3
4-
5
1
1
6
5
5
3
0
3
4
4
2
4
2
5
5
3
23
1
4
3
0
4
4
4
1
4
6
7
4
4
0
2
2
3
2
5
3
6
9
4
23
»
3
4
5
3
4
6
1
2
3
5
3
4
4
3
3
2
3
2
5
7
4
22
11
4
5
3
3
2
3
4
1
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
20
11
2
5
2
3
2
3
6
1
2
2
2
3
1
3
3
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
22
12
1
3
2
2
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
23
1
1
3
1
1
4
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
21
2
3
1
3
2 :
3
3
2
4
2
2
3
2
0
1
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
2
22
4
2
3
2
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
0
1
3
2
4
2
3
4
1
2
3
2
23
P
5
2
4
1
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
0
1
2
2
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
23
M
(
4
1
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
0
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
22
7
4
2
3
4
3
2
3
2
3
0
1
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
22
1
5
4
3
6
4
2
4
4
4
0
2
5
3
4
3
4
6
3
5
5
4
22
9
3
5
3
7
6
2
5
6
3
0
3
5
4
4
2
5
5
3
5
5
4
22
11
3
4
4
6
7
1
4
6
3
0
4
5
6
2
5
5
2
5
4
4
22
11
3
4
3
6
5
1
4
5
3
0
3
4
6
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
22
DAILY
MEAN
3.3
3.1
2,4
2.6
3.7
3.7
1.8
2.4
3.6
3.*
2.9
1.6
0.9
3.1
2.8
.5
2.5
2.3
3.6
2.3
3.*
3.8
2.9
MO.
OFM
17
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
21
23
13
23
20
23
23
23
22
23
y i
23
23
23
516
S-MIN
MAX.
7
5
13
5
8
8
4
5
7
8
6
5
4
5
6
4
5
6
5
6
10
-------
TABLE 3-57 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
07
28
29
30
31
MOHTHLV
M.OFB
MX. Ml
OF
KEEK
WED
TMU
Fll
SAT
SUN
MOM
TUE
W8D
TMU
FDI
SAT
ciiM
MQN
TUE
W^D
TMU
FBI
SAT
sgN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
S*r
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FBI
MEAN
KB
THEM
12
5
4
6
3
2
2
2
3
7
6
3
6
3
5
4
2
2
4
2
3
3
4
4
6
7
it
4
26
7
1
4
3
6
2
2
2
2
3
5
3
5
3
3
3
2
1
4
2
4
3
3
6
9
3
4
26
H
2
4
3
6
2
1
1
1
3
5
3
5
3
3
4
2
2
5
3
3
3
3
•»
7
6
2
3
26
7
3
4
3
!>
2
2
1
1
3
4
3
3
4
3
4
2
1
5
2
f.
i
3
6
4
2
3
?6
o
4
3
4
5
2
2
1
1
2
4
3
4
4
2
3
3
1
5
2
2
2
2
7
4
2
3
26
7
*
S
3
3
5
1
2
1
1
3
3
3
4
3
1
3
2
1
5
2
2
2
2
6
6
2
3
26
6
M
C
4
4
6
2
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
4
2
5
3
3
2
2
4
6
5
4
3
27
6
7
4
6
B
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
3
1
2
5
3
7
7
4
3
2
6
7
6
5
4
27
8
1
7
e
6
2
2
3
3
4
10
2
3
4
4
13
9
4
3
2
12
15
)6
6
6
24
16
9
7
6
4
3
3
3
3
4
6
4
3
3
4
4
5
2
2
3
18
17
12
3
S
24
18
It
2
4
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
2
4
4
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
3
7
7
8
4
25
a
u
2
3
2
2
3
2
4
3
4
2
4
2
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
4
5
5
3
22
5
12
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
6
2
4
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
24
6
1
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
5
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
25
5
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
3
2
3
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
23
3
4
4
3
3
1
1
2
3
4
3
3
2
4
2
2
3
5
2
2
3
3
2
5
5
4
3
3
27
5
P
S
4
3
3
2
1
2
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
5
3
3
3
4
2
5
4
5
4
3
27
5
•
C
4
3
3
2
1
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
6
4
4
2
2
3
5
2
3
4
4
6
4
3
27
6
7
5
4
4
2
2
2
2
5
3
3
5
4
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
3
5
4
4
7
7
4
4
26
7
1
6
5
4
2
2
3
2
7
3
8
7
6
a
3
3
4
5
7
3
4
5
7
9
8
3
5
26
9
9
6
7
3
2
3
2
3
7
3
4
7
7
6
7
4
3
4
5
.fl
3
4
5
8
R
7
2
5
26
8
U
5
6
3
2
3
2
2
7
4
6
6
6
5
3
4
4
5
4
4
3
5
7
7
6
3
4
26
7
U
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
7
4
6
5
5
5
2
3
4
3
4
4
3
5
6
6
5
3
4
26
7
ONLY
KM
«.*
3.8
4.1
1.9
1.8
2.0
2.2
3.8
.0
3.*
4.0
*.3
4.0
3.2
3.2
2.9
3.1
4.2
3.6
2.9
3.0
3.1
.9
6.0
6.8
6.2
3.2
3.6
M>
OF Ml
20
23
23
23
23
23
22
23
zz
21
22
22
22
23
23
23
19
22
23
23
23
22
17
17
22
23
19
588
MM
•ML
8
9
11
3
3
3
5
8
8
6
8
12
7
8
7
6
6
14
10
5
6
6
8
19
19
20
6
-------
TABLE 3-58 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (coJorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
29
30
MORTM.'
HO.OTD
MAX.HM
OF
WEEK
SAT
sgN
M0N
TgE
WfD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MO,N
TUE
WBD
THU
FRI
CAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
'MEM
AYS
YMEAN
12
2
2
3
2
3
4
4
2
2
1
2
4
1
3
4
3
4
5
6
6
3
2
2
3
25
6
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
4
8
2
1
1
2
4
2
2
3
2
3
4
5
5
2
3
0
4
3
27
8
2
^
2
2
1
2
2
4
7
2
1
1
2
2
4
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
5
I
2
0
3
3
27
7
3
?
2
2
1
1
2
3
6
2
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
5
1
2
0
3
2.
27
6
4
2
2
1
1
I
2
3
5
1
2
1
2
3
1
3
3
2
2
4
5
5
1
2
3
2
26
5
A
5
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
5
1
2
1
I
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
5
1
2
3
3
2
27
5
M
6
2
2
2
1
3
2
3
5
1
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
4
2
2
2
3
2
27
5
7
?.
2
2
2
2
3
4
6
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
5
2
4
6
2
2
3
3
3
27
6
8
2
2
2
2
2
3
8
U
2
1
3
4
2
4
3
3
5
it
6
8
2
2
4
4
4
26
11
9
2
2
2
1
2
2
7
6
2
1
3
5
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
6
7
2
5
2
5
4
4
28
7
10
3
2
2
1
3
2
5
5
3
1
3
4
2
2
3
4
3
4
6
2
4
2
4
5
3
26
6
11
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
3
2
2
3
1
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
4
2
2
3
3
25
5
12
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
'4
2
2
3
3
24
5
1
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
3
2
2
4
3
2
2
22
5
2
1
1
1
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
1
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
23
5
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
1
3
2
3
3
4
4
4
2
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
25
5
r
5
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
X
3
2
3
3
4
4
5
2
6
5
4
4
3
3
3
25
6
M
C
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
1
5
2
3
3
4
5
6
4
6
5
3
4
5
6
25
6
7
2
4
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
1
5
2
3
5
4
6
6
5
5
5
3
4
5
7
25
7
1
2
5
4
3
3
5
3
3
1
4
2
3
4
3
6
6
6
4
6
3
5
5
6
24
6
»
2
5
4
3
4
4
3
2
1
4
3
3
4
3
5
6
5
3
5
3
5
6
23
6
M
2
4 '
4
3 '
3
4
2
2
1
3
3
4
4
3
5
5
6
3
5
3
4
6
23
6
U
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
2
1
3
3
4
4
3
5
5
5
6
3
5
3
3
7
24
7
ONLY
MM
2.1
2.6
2.3
2.0
2.5
2.8
3.6
4.4
1.9
1.3
2.4
2.7
^ 1
2.4
2.4
3.0
3.3
2.8
3.7
4.2
4.4
4.6
3.0
4 3
3.6
2.9
2.8
4.2
3.0
M.
OF Mi
23
20
23
18
23
23
19
22
24
21
23
13
23
22
23
22
22
16
23
21
23
21
21
16
14
23
19
21
982
VMM
MAX.
4
5
4
4
4
5
12
14
3
2
5
7
5
4
5
5
6
6
6
8
9
7
7
7
6
6
8
-------
TABLE 3-59 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colonmetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1962
DAY
MOUTH
i
2
3
4
s
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
HO.OFD
MAX. Ml
OF
MEEK
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
Fpl
SAT
sgN
MQN
TUE
wqo
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
W|D
ThfU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
W|D
THU
Tf\
SAT
SUN
MON
TtlE
wp
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
7
2
2
4
2
2
4
1
1
2
I
2
1
0
3
5
i
0
2
3
2
3
2
3
4
3
2
23
7
1
7
2
1
4
-------
TABLE 3-eo HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (coiorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
OQ
30
•onroii
NO.OFD
MAX. urn
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
M0N
TUE
WED
THU
Ffll
SUN
MQN
TUE
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
M0N
TUE
WF.D
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MftN
TUE
WED
Trtu
FRI
rMEM
AYS
YMEAN
12
4
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
5
3
25
5
1
3
2
3
1
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
4
2
25
4
2
3
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
3
5
2
25
5
3
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
j
3
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
3
5
2
25
5
4
3
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
5
2
24
5
A
5
3
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
5
2
24
5
M
6
3
2
2
1
i 3
3
3
3
y
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
6
3
24
6
7
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
6
3
23
6
1
3
'3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
'?
t.
3
<:
3
3
1
2
8
3
22
8
9
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
5
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
12
3
23
12
10
3
3
2
2
4
3
4
4
5
2
3
1
3
2
1
2
3
3
IB
4
22
18
11
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
2
23
4
22
23
12
2
4
2
3
3
4
3
4
2
2
1
2
3
3
1
2
2
8
3
?2
8
1
2
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
1
2
3
4
3
24
4
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
3
3
4
3
22
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
-•,
3
3
3
i,
2
3
3
4
3
1
3
2
3
5
3
26
5
P
S
3
'»
3
3
<«
3
3
3
4
2
4
2
3
4
4
3
1
3
3
4
6
3
26
6
M
6
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
5
2
4
5
2
3
3
4
4
2
3
3
3
4
5
3
26
5
7
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
5
2
3
4
3
4
1
2
3
3
5
3
26
5
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
4
4
1
2
3
4
4
5
3
25
5
S
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
5
5
3
25
5
M
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
3
3
1
2
3
3
6
3
25
6
11
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
2
2
3
3
1
2
3
3
8
3
25
8
OM.V
mm
3y
2.8
3.0
2.*
2.1
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.9
24
3.3
2.1
2.9
1.7
2.2
3.1
2.6
2.6
1.2
2.2
2.4
3.0
t3
7.1
2.9
•0.
OFM
75
22
24
23
21
23
23
23
23
?*
23
22
23
21
18
14
17
23
23
18
23
15
y ^
23
557
MM
MAX.
4
6
6
4
6
4
5
6
6
4
6
3
4
5
5
6
4
4
4
5
25
-------
TABLE 3-61 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI. DECEMBER 1962
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MOUTHY
M.OFD
MAIHM
OF
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
W?D
T^U
FBI
SAT
StJN
MON
TUE
WCD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
MEAN
ITS
YMEAM
12
6
5
4
2
1
2
2
3
3
5
1
?
1
2
2
3
2
3
It
6
1
5
5
3
2
2
1
2
3
5
1
5
1
1
1
2
3
16
5
2
6
4
3
2
2
a
3
3
6
1
5
1
1
1
2
3
16
6
3
6
4
3
2
2
2
3
3
5
1
4
1
1
2
2
3
16
6
4
6
10
4
3
1
2
2
3
3
5
1
4
1
1
2
2
3
17
10
*
S
7
9
4
2
1
1
2
3
2
4
1
4
2
I
1
2
3
17
9
M
C
8
5
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
1
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
17
8
7
7
4
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
1
7
3
1
2
3
4
3
17
7
1
8
9
5
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
5
3
1
2
3
4
3
17
9
1
9
6
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
5
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
18
9
M
14
9
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
2
6
2
2
2
4
4
2
4
17
14
11
22
11
2
2
2
2
0
3
3
2
2
6
3
3
2
2
3
2
4
16
22
12
25
9
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
4
1*
25
1
8
10
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
1
2
3
3
3
19
10
7
6
3
2
2
1
2
2
3
3
*
1
3
5
3
2
2
3
3
18
7
7
7
5
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
5
2
4
6
3
2
3
4
3
3
19
7
P
11
8
5
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
5
2
5
7
2
2
3
4
3
4
19
11
M
11
8
5
2
2
1
2
3
2
3
5
2
5
7
2
2
3
3
19
11
7
10
8
5
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
5
2
5
7
2
2
3
3
19
10
1
9
7
6
3
1
1
2
3
2
3
5
2
4
7
2
2
2
3
19
9
>
8
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
6
1
5
7
2
2
2
3
19
8
11
8
6
5
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
5
2
7
6
2
2
2
3
19
8
11
5
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
5
1
5
6
2
2
2
2
17
6
DAIY
MEAN
9.*
7.2
5.5
2.3
2.1
1.6
1.9
2.2
1.9
2.8
3.7
2.8
2.8
5.5
2.1
1.7
1.7
2.7
3.2
2.6
•
NO.
OFM
22
15
22
14
23
20
13
23
22
23
23
23
23
21
23
23
14
23
22
14
406
S-MIN
MAX.
30
13
13
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
6
7
8
8
3
4
3
4
6
4
-------
TABLE 3-62 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. Of &
MAX. MO.
OF
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MEAN
AYS
YMCAN
12
2
5
5
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
2
3
2
2
3
4
4
2
3
21
5
1
2
5
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
2
1
3
3
4
4
2
3
21
5
2
2
6
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
5
4
2
3
21
6
3
2
7
3
3
2
2
Z
3
2
1
2
2
1
2
3
4
3
2
3
21
7
4
2
6
3
3
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
2
1
3
3
4
3
2
3
21
6
A
%
2
7
3
3
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
6
3
2
3
21
7
M
(
2
8
3
4
2
3
2
2
2
0
2
2
2
3
3
5
4
3
3
21
8
7
2
8
3
4
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
21
8
1
2
8
3
6
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
20
8
»
2
8
3
5
2
3
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
4
3
2
3
4
3
21
B
M
2
3
5
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
4
3
2
5
3
17
6
11
2
3
6
3
3
2
2
3
1
3
2
4
3
2
3
3
3
18
6
12
2
3
3
4
3
4
2
2
4
1
2
4
2
3
4
3
17
4
1
2
4
4
4
3
4
2
2
3
1
3
2
2
3
2
5
3
4
3
19
5
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
2
1
3
2
3
4
4
3
5
3
17
5
4
3
6
3
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
4
4
2
4
5
3
20
6
P
S
4
6
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
?
3
4
4
2
5
4
3
20
6
M
6
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
5
3
4
4
4
20
5
7
5
4
3
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
3
3
5
3
4
3
3
20
5
1
5
5
5
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
3
5
3
4
4
3
20
5
9
5
6
4
3
2
3
3
4
1
2
3
2
2
3
5
3
4
4
3
21
6
11
5
6
3
3
2
3
3
6
1
2
3
2
2
3
5
3
3
4
3
21
6
11
5
6
3
3
2
3
3
5
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
3
4
3
21
6
DAILY
MEAN
2.9
5.8
3.3
3.7
2.4
2.7
2.1
2.8
2.1
1.5
2.3
2.2
2.0
3.2
3.6
3.3
3Q
• ^
L. 1
3.5
3.4
3.0
NO.
OF HI
23
20
23
23
23
23
23
19
23
23
19
yl
21
23
23
21
21
?n
22
23
460
S-MIN
MAX.
6
9
6
7
4
4
3
6
5
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
5
7
-------
TABLE 3-63 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1963
OAT
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MOHTHl
NO. Of 1
MAX. M
OF
HfER
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
VMCAN
MYS
LYMEAN
12
4
3
2
6
4
4
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
6
5
2
2
5
3
1
it
2
3
3
3
26
6
1
3
3
2
6
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
6
5
2
3
5
3
1
4
2
3
3
3
26
6
2
3
2
2
6
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
6
6
2
•a
5
3
]
3
2
3
^
3
26
6
3
3
2
2
6
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
6
6
1
5
3
1
4
2
3
3
3
26
6
4
3
2
1
7
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
2
6
6
1
5
3
1
3
2
3
3
3
26
7
A
S
2
1
7
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
7
5
2
4
2
1
3
2
3
3
3
26
7
M
(
2
2
7
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
7
5
2
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
4
3
26
7
7
3
2
7
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
p
3
3
7
5
2
5
2
2
3
2
3
3
25
7
1
3
2
8
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
4
3
8
6
2
5
2
1
4
3
3
4
25
8
9
3
2
8
2
3
3
3
3
2
4
3
4
4
2
2
4
2
3
3
22
8
II
2
2
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
5
2
4
3
2
4
2
3
3
21
8
II
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
2
^
3
2
3
2
5
3
2
4
2
2
3
21
5
12
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
5
2
2
4
2
3
21
7
1
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
?
b
2
2
4
3
3
22
5
7
3
2
2
4
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
4
1
2
2
3
3«
3
3
21
5
4
2
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
25
6
r
5
2
4
4
3
3
3
4
&
3
3
2
4
3
5
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
26
6
M
6
2
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
2
5
4
5
4
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
26
6
7
2
5
4
3
2
3
4
3
3
2
2
5
4
5
5
2
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
26
5
1
2
5
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
5
4
5
4
2
4
3
4
2
3
3
3
26
5
9
2
5
3
4
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
4
4
5
4
2
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
26
5
11
2
6
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
•5
5
5
3
2
3
2
4
2
3
4
3
25
6
11
2
6
4
2
4
3
3
3
2
2
4
5
5
3
2
3
3
5
2
4
3
3
25
6
DAtV
MUM
3*.
«o
2.3
2.9
5.6
2.9
2.5
2.7
3.3
2.7
2.6
2.7
1.8
20
» '
4.0
3.5
5.8
4.3
1.8
4,u
4.U
2.6
2.2
3.1
2.5
2.9
3.?
•0.
OFM
71
23
23
17
23
19
23
22
18
22
23
23
y>
19
22
17
23
22
23
23
23
22
?\
23
565
MMN
MAX.
4
7
9
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
5
6
8
21
3
5
5
3
5
5
5
4
9
-------
TABLE 3-64 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO.OFDI
MAX. Ml
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
T^U
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MEAN
IYS
YMEAN
12
3
4
5
10
3
1
2
2
5
2
2
3
4
2
2
2
1
0
1
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
28
10
1
3
3
4
7
3
1
2
2
4
1
1
2
3
2
1
2
1
0
1
4
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
28
7
2
3
2
4
7
3
1
1
1
5
1
1
2
3
2
1
2
1
0
1
4
4
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
28
7
3
2
2
4
9
2
0
1
1
4
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
0
0
1
3
4
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
28
9
4
2
3
4
8
2
0
1
1
3
1
0
2
2
1
1
2
1
0
1
3
3
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
28
8
A
S
2
3
3
6
2
0
1
2
3
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
1
0
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
28
6
M
C
3
3
3
7
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
2
3
1
2
2
1
0
2
3
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
23
7
7
3
4
3
7
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
3
I
3
1
0
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
27
7
S
3
5
3
7
2
1
2
3
2
2
1
3
3
1
3
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
1
3
26
7
»
3
5
3
8
2
1
2
2
3
2
1
4
2
1
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
2
3
27
8
II
3
4
4
2
2
2
3
1
1
5
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
4
3
2
3
26
5
11
3 '
5
4
4
3
1
2
2
4
2
3
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
27
5
12
1 3
4
3
4
4
1.
I
2
4
2
2
2
4
1
3
2
I
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
3
2
2
27
4
1
3
5
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
4
1
3
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
'/.
2
2
2
27
5
7
3
4
4
4
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
3
3
2
3
20
4
4
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
28
5
P
S
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
2
4
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-65 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MHTM.'
W.OfO
H|¥ MM
OF
WEEK
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WfD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TME
'KM
AYS
V MFAM
12
3
4
2
1
3
7
2
1
2
3
2
5
3
3
4
4
1
1
1
4
2
1
4
5
2
1
2
3
29
1
3
4
2
1
3
6
2
1
2
2
1
5
2
3
4
3
2
3
1
4
2
1
2
3
5
3
0
2
3
29
2
3
4
2
1
4
6
2
3
1
1
2
5
2
3
4
3
2
3
1
4
1
1
2
3
5
2
0
1
3
29
6
3
3
3
2
1
5
5
2
2
1
1
3
5
2
4
4
2
2
2
1
4
0
1
2
2
5
5
2
0
0
2
29
4
3
3
3
0
6
6
2
2
1
1
4
4
1
3
4
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
2
4
1
1
0
2
29
6
A
5
3
3
3
1
4
5
2
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
4
1
1
0
3
29
M
6
3
4
3
1
3
5
3
2
2
2
4
3
2
3
4
4
3
3
2
3
2
1
3
3
5
1
2
1
3
29
7
4
4
3
1
3
4
4
2
2
1
4
3
1
4
4
3
3
4
2
2
2
2
3
3
6
6
0
3
1
3
29
6
1
4
5
3
1
5
3
4
2
2
2
6
3
1
5
4
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
9
0
3
1
3
29
9
6
3
1
1
5
3
5
2
2
2
3
1
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
4
0
2
3
24
10
2
2
2
5
3
5
2
2
3
2
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
0
4
2
2
25
11
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
1
2
1
2
25
12
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
1
0
1
2
25
1
2
?
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
?
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
2
25
2
2
1
2
3
4
2
3
2
1
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
22
3
2
1
2
3
2
6
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
3
2
2
29
P
4
3
2
3
2
6
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
!>
2
2
£.
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
26
6
M
5
3
1
5
3
6
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
4
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
3
2
3
28
5
4
1
7
4
6
2
2
3
4
2
3
3
4
1
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
28
5
1
9
5
5
2
3
3
5
3
3
5
4
1
4
2
5
5
3
2
3
3
1
1
2
3
27
6
2
1
9
5
4
2
3
3
5
3
4
5
4
1
3
1
5
4
3
2
4
3
1
1
2
3
28
H
4
2
1
8
5
2
2
3
2
6
3
3
5
5
1
2
1
5
3
3
2
4
3
1
I
2
3
28
11
3
3
I
7
4
1
2
4
2
5
2
4
4
4
1
2
2
4
3
2
2
4
3
1
2
3
3
28
MC.T
KM
3.7
2.9
1.8
1.3
4.7
3.9
3.7
2.0
2.1
2.0
3.4
3.0
2.0
3.3
4.0
2.1
2.4
2.0
2.3
2.8
2.1
1.9
20
• 0
2.7
3.4
1.0
1.7
1.5
2.7
•>.
OF«
20
22
23
16
23
22
20
23
22
22
21
23
23
23
18
23
22
23
23
22
20
23
7 y
23
71
23
22
19
22
631
MM
ML
7
5
3
4
10
7
7
3
4
3
6
6
4
5
5
4
4
4
6
5
3
3
5
iu
11
5
4
3
-------
TABLE 3-66 HOUKLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (cotorinwtric analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1963
DAY
MMTN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
M.OF Of
mourn.
OF
•OK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MPN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
MEM
IVS
YMEM
12
2
5
4
1
2
2
3
1
3
1
4
6
3
2
2
2
5
5
3
20
6
1
2
5
3
1
2
2
4
2
3
1
3
5
3
2
2
1
4
5
3
20
5
2
5
1
1
3
1
4
1
4
1
2
4
3
1
2
1
4
5
3
20
5
2
4
1
1
3
2
3
1
3
1
3
4
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
20
5
2
4
1
2
3
2
3
1
3
I
2
4
2
1
2
2
2
5
2
20
5
A
2
4
2
3
3
2
3
1
3
1
3
2
3
1
2
2
2
3
4
2
20
4
M
3
4
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
3
4
3
20
4
3
5
3
3
2
2
3
3
4
1
4
3
1
3
3
3
2
4
3
20
6
3
6
3
2
2
2
3
3
5
4
3
1
3
3
3
3
4
3
19
6
1 3
5
6
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
3
2
2
3
3
18
6
10
2
3
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
19
3
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
19
3
n
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
20
3
1
2
2
2
0
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
20
3
2
3
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
16
3
4
3
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
4
4
3
1
3
3
2
2
3
2
21
4
r
%
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
2
3
2
21
3
M
i
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
21
3
7
4
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
0
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
21
4
1
4
6
4
3
2
3
4
3
4
1
6
4
3
3
2
4
5
6
4
21
6
9
5
6
4
2
3
3
4
2
4
1
6
4
3
3
3
5
5
7
4
21
7
M
6
5
4
2
2
3
3
2
4
1
6
4
3
2
2
5
5
7
4
21
7
11
6
5
4
1
2
2
3
1
4
1
6
4
2
2
2
.5
5
a
3
21
8
ONLY
MEM
2.9
4.0
3y
• '
3.0
2.0
1.7
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.0
3.3
3.4
3.4
1.9
2.3
2.4
2.6
3.1
4.1
2.7
n.
OFNt
23
23
7?
13
22
22
23
23
22
23
18
20
23
23
23
22
23
22
23
23
23
459
HNN
MAI.
6
7
8
4
4
3
4
5
4
6
4
5
7
6
4
4
5
5
6
a
-------
TABLE 3-67 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (cplorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
•flnwt
•0. Of 0
MALM
OF
WEEK
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
TfcU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
TLJII
FRI
SAT
SUN
•rift
AYS
YMEAM
12
7
7
5
3
2
4
4
2
3
2
2
3
3
8
5
6
6
2
4
5
6
6
6
6
7
25
8
1
7
6
5
3
2
4
4
2
3
2
1
3
2
7
5
6
5
2
4
5
5
6
5
5
24
7
2
6
5
4
2
2
3
4
2
2
2
1
2
2
7
4
6
5
3
3
5
5
S
5
5
24
7
3
4
6
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
2
1
2
2
7
4
6
4
4
2
5
5
b
5
5
24
7
5
6
<«
1
2
3
4
1
2
2
1
3
3
6
4
6
4
4
2
4
5
6
5
4
24
6
A
6
6
3
2
2
3
4
1
1
3
1
4
2
5
4
6
4
3
2
4
5
6
5
4
24
6
;
M
7
6
3
3
3
4
4
1
I
3
1
4
3
5
5
7
6
3
3
5
7
7
4
4
24
7
9
5
5
4
4
5
6
2
2
3
1
4
3
^
6
12
9
3
4
7
8
11
7
24
12
8
5
9
3
3
6
11
3
1
3
1
4
4
3
7
20
7
3
4
5
3
6
19
17
25
20
7
5
9
3
6
8
3
2
3
2
4
3
6
13
6
3
3
3
3
6
6
11
10
23
13
1
11
7
4
3
4
4
3
2
3
2
3
3
1
4
6
3
3
2
2
4
3
4
22
8
11
3
3
4
3
3
3
1
2
3
2
3
2
3
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
21
5
12
3
2
3
2
4
2
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
22
4
1
2
2
4
3
3
3
1
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
23
4
2
3
2
5
4
3
6
2
1
1
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
23
6
4
3
2
6
4
3
6
3
2
1
2
1
4
3
3
1
3
4
3
4
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
26
6
f
S
3
1
6
5
4
7
4
1
1
3
C
4
3
6
1
3
4
3
4
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
26
7
H
(
3
2
7
4
3
5
6
2
1
2
0
5
2
3
2
3
7
3
5
4
2
3
2
2
3
3
26
7
7
4
3
4
5
3
4
6
2
2
2
0
5
3
4
3
3
3
3
6
3
2
3
3
4
4
26
6
1
6
4
4
4
4
•>
5
3
3
2
0
5
3
5
4
7
5
4
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
4
26
7
1
8
4
3
5
4
4
5
3
3
2
0
5
3
5
4
7
7
6
4
5
4
6
6
8
5
5
26
8
M
8
5
3
4
5
4
4
3
3
2
I
4
3
6
5
7
8
6
4
3
5
7
6
7
7
5
26
8
11
9
6
4
3
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
4
4
8
5
7
7
5
4
5
6
6
5
6
7
5
26
9
Mir
•EM
5.4!
4.3
4.8
3.3
3.1
4.2
4.5
2.0
1.8
2.3
1.0
3.8
2.9
3.6
3.9
4.4
6.3
*.7
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.3
4.6
5.5
5.3
.9
•0
OFM
23
22
20
18
23
23
23
23
23
21
21
13
21
23
22
23
21
23
23
20
23
16
23
23
23
pa
4&n
CMMI
J-M^N
MAX.
11
8
12
5
5
8
13
4
4
4
2
6
5
13
8
8
22
10
6
6
9
7
9
22
23
H
-------
TABLE 3-68 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MONTHLY
NO.OFD
MM. HUL
OF
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
wrn
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
4
2
1
6
It
2
2
4
3
4
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
4
2
2
2
3
2
23
6
1
3
1
2
1
it
I
2
3
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
1
3
2
22
4
2
3
1
2
1
4
1
3
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
I
3
2
22
4
3
3
2
1
2
4
1
2
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
3
-\
2
22
4
4
2
1
1
3
4
1
2
2
2
2
I
1
1
1
i
2
3
2
1
1
3
2
22
4
A
5
2
2
1
5
7
1
2
3
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
3
2
22
7
M
(
2
2
3
6
11
1
3
4
3
2
1
2
1
1
0
2
3
2
1
2
4
3
22
U
7
2
2
4
2
3
4
3
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
5
2
20
5
1
3
2
4
2
4
4
3
3
1
2
1
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
6
3
20
6
J
3
2
4
6
1
3
5
2
3
1
1
1
3
5
2
3
2
1
1
1
5
3
22
6
U
3
3
2
4
2
4
2
3
1
2
1
4
2
3
2
1
1
4
2
19
4
U
3
5
2
2
3
3
1
5
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
3
2
1
1
3
2
21
5
12
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
23
4
1
3
2
3
2
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
24
3
2
2
1
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
0
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
2
24
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
2
3
3 -
2
1
1
1
3
0
2
3
2
1
1
2
3
2
25
3
P
5
2
4
3
3
4
4
2
1
3
3
3
2
1
1
1
3
0
2
3
3
1
1
3
3
2
25
4
H
6
2
4
2
4
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
4
0
2
3
3
1
2
2
2
2
25
4
7
3
4
4
5
3
4
2
3
3
3-
3
2
1
2
1
3
0
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
25
5
t
4
4
4
7
5
6
2
3
4
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
0
2
4
3
2
2
3
5
3
25
7
9
6
5
4
7
6
7
2
3
4
5
3
2
1
2
2
2
0
2
4
2
2
1
3
6
3
25
7
10
5
4
4
6
5
2
3
5
5
3
2
1
2
2
2
0
3
4
2
2
2
3
6
3
24
6
11
5
3
2
6
5
1
3
4
5
4
2
1
2
1
1
0
2
3
2
2
2
3
5
3
24
6
DAILY
MEAN
3.1
2.7
2.9
3.6
4.3
4.0
2.5
1.7
2.8
3.5
2.7
2.2
1.2
1.5
1.1
2.0
0.9
1.9
2.7
2.3
1.5
1.*
2.0
3.7
2.4
NO.
OFHft
21
20
23
19
17
14
13
23
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
21
23
15
23
23
23
23
21
23
5-S
527
5-MIN
MAX.
8
6
6
8
12
7
5
4
5
6
4
4
2
2
2
4
6
3
5
4
3
3
4
7
-------
TABLE 3-69 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorlnMtric analysis)
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 1963
DAY
MOHTN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
HO. OF ft
MAXM.
OF
WEEK
rpu
flRI
SAT
SUN
MDN
T^E
WED
F'pl
SAT
SIJN
MDN
TJJE
WfD
TMU
FRI
SAT
S(JN
MpN
T^E
WED
PRI
SAT
S^JN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
RRI
SAT
MEAN
MS
YMEAN
12
2
4
5
3
3
2
4
4
5
4
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
5
3
1
4
3
3
26
5
1
2
3
5
3
3
2
4
4
4
3
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
2
1
3
3
3
26
5
2 J
2
3
5
3
2
3
3
4
3
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
2
1
3
3
3
25
5
3
1
3
4
3
2
3
2
4
3
2
3
2
2
1
3
4
2
1
3
4
3
24
4
2
3
3
3
2
3
1
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
1
2
3
2
24
A
2
4
3
2
2
1
3
3
2
3
2
2
1
3
3
2
1
2
3
2
23
M
2
4
3
4
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
23
3
5
4
4
4
4
2
5
3
2
4
2
1
2
2
4
5
2
1
3
3
3
24
5
3
3
4
4
6
2
7
4
2
4
2
1
2
2
6
1 A
8
3
1
4
3
4
24
1 2
3
6
6
1
8
5
2
3
2
1
2
3
12
10
3
1
9
3
5
23
•
2
5
2
5
3
3
1
6
3
2
3
2
2
U
6
3
1
13
2
4
22
11
2
2
3
4
2
2
1
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
6
3
3
23
0
1
2
3
3
2
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
n
2
3
2
2
2
2
25
1
1 '
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
4
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
25
2
1
2 '
1
2
3
3
2
3
2
i
2
1
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
23
3
1
3
3
3
3
' 2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
1
4
4
2
4
3
3
2
3
24
P
3
1
2
4
3
4
2
2
4
2
4
3
3
2
2
A
4
2
4
2
2
3
24
M
2
1
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
A
4
2
3
23
3
2 !
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
&
4
2
2
3
24
4
2
4
3
4
3
5
4
3
2
3
5
2
2
3
4
5
5
3
4
4
24
4
2
4
3
4
3
4
5
4
2
3
5
2
2
3
3
6
5
2
4
4
24
10
4
2
3
3
5
3
5
5
3
2
4
5
2
2
3
3
5
5
5
3
4
4
24
11
4
2
3
2
4
4
6
5
2
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
5
5
3
2
4
3
24
DALY
HUN
2.4
2.6
3.2
2.9
• o
2 8
3.3
2.6
4.0
3.3
2.0
2.3
3.3
3.3
2.4
1.7
2.7
2.6
4.3
5 4
4.2
2.4
1.2
4.1
2.9
3.1
NO.
OfM
23
23
23
23
22
23
23
23
22
19
16
23
23
23
23
21
21
21
23
23
23
23
14
14
23
552
54NN
MAX.
5
1 L.
6
7
5
5
7
6
9
6
3
4
5
6
5
3
5
4
16
t fl
11
4
2
14
5
-------
TABLE 3-70 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
• 25
26
27
28
29
30
BOHtMF
NO. Of!
MM. Mi
0
WE
S
M
T
W
T|
F
S,
SI
M
T!
W
T»
P
S
SI
Ml
T
W
Tl
F
S,
S
M
T
W
T
F
i
tm
m
YMI
F
EK
JN
ON
\K
Fn
HU
Rl
IVT
JN
?N
JE
ED
4U
Rl
AT
JN
PN
IJE
IU
Rl
AT
JN
3N
JE
:D
HU
Rl
E
M
EM
12
4
2
2
2
6
5
5
4
3
1
2
3
2
3
8
7
4
2
3
2
2
4
4
4
3
2
3
28
8
1
3
3
1
2
6
5
4
4
2
1
2
2
2
3
8
6
3
2
3
2
2
3
4
4
2
2
3
28
8
2
3
2
1
2
5
4
4
4
2
1
2
1
2
3
6
7
4
1
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
2
3
28
7
3
3
2
1
2
5
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
7
6
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
28
7
4
3
2
1
2
4
4
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
2
6
4
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
3
28
6
A
S
4
2
1
2
4
4
3
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
6
4
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
1
3
28
6
M
«
3
2
1
2
4
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
1
2
6
4
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
a
3
2
3
28
6
7
4
2
1
2
4
3
3
5
5
4
2
2
1
2
7
5
5
2
2
2
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
28
7
t
4
2
1
2
6
4
9
7
6
4
2
2
1
3
7
6
2
2
3
4
6
7
3
3
4
27
9
1
2
1
2
3
6
4
13
6
3
2
2
2
5
7
2
2
2
3
12
15
4
2
4
5
25
15
11
1
1
3
3
5
3
12
4
3
2
2
15
6
2
2
2
9
12
6
2
5
5
22
15
11
1
2
2
3
3
2
6
4
2
2
2
12
4
2
2
2
4
5
5
2
2
3
22
12
12
1,
2
2
3
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
6
2
2
2
2
3
4
2
3
20
6
1
0
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
3
4
2
2
20
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
3
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
21
4
'
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
4
6
4
1
5
2
4
3
2
3
3
3
2
4
3
22
6
P
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
1
6
4
6
2
2
3
4
4
3
2
3
3
24
6
M
2'
2
2
3
4
3
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
7
4
6
3
3
3
4
4
5
3
4
2
4
3
27
7
7
3
2
2
3
5
4
5
5
4
4
2
2
7
10
4
7
4
3
4
4
5
6
4
3
2
4
4
27
10
1
i
4 |
2
2
7
6
4
6
5
5
4
3
2
2
8
11
4
7
3
2
4
3
5
5
4
3
2
3
4
28
11
»
3
2
2
7
6
3
6
5
4
3
3
2
2
9
10
5
3
3
2
3
4'
5
5
4
3
2
3
4
28
10
M
3
2
2
7
6
4
5
5
3
2
3
2
2
8
10
4
3
3
2
3
3
4
5
4
3
2
3
4
28
10
11
3
2
2
7
5
4
5
4
2
3
3
2
2
8
8
4
3
3
2
3
4
4
4
3
2
3
4
28
8. ,
DAIY
KM
3.0
1.7
1.8
1.7
3.2
4.4
3.3
4,9
4.2
3.7
2.7
2.3
1.7
1.6
4.4
7.6
4.4
2.3
2.2
2.5
2.7
4.3
4.8
4.7
3.5
2.2
2.6
3.3
NO.
OF HI
18
14
14
23
23
23
23
23
20
23
23
14
18
23
16
21
22
19
23
23
19
23
17
19
20
23
23
21
999
S4MN
MAIL
5
3
3
3
8
7
5
14
8
7
5
3
3 i
3
9
16
8
9
4
3
4
5
5
14
17
7
3
5
-------
TABLE 3-71 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO.OFD
MAX. Ml
OF
KEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
TUE
WED
THU
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
-SAT
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
3
3
I
2
5
3
5
5
5
6
5
4
2
5
5
4
5
7
5
5
4
5
2
2
2
4
4
30
7
1
3
2
1
2
2
5
5
5
6
3
2
5
5
4
5
7
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
4
29
7
2
3
2
I
2
2
4
5
4
5
2
2
5
5
4
-
4
6
4
4
5
2
2
2
3
3
29
6
3
2
2
1
2
2
4
4
4
4
2
2
4
4
4
4
6
4
4
5
2
2
2
3
3
29
6
4
2
2
1
2
y
4
4
4
4
1
3
4
4
3
4
6
4
4
3
2
1
2
3
3
29
6
A
5
2
2
2
2
1
3
4
4
5
2
2
4
4
3
4
5
4
3
4
2
2
2
2
3
29
5
M
C
2
2
2
2
1
3
4
4
4
4
2
2
6
4
3
4
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
29
6
7
2
5
3
2
i
4
4
4
5
5
3
2
5
5
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
30
5
1
3
2
3
2
5
7
4
8
6
5
2
2
8
6
6
3
5
6
4
3
4
4
3
2
4
3
4
10
8
»
3
2
2
5
8
7
6
15
5
3
.2
a
9
a
11
10
3
8
11
3
5
6
2
4
6
27
15
M
3
5
6
4
7
5
3
2
9
11
13
10
8
6
15
4
6
6
3
3
6
22
15
11
2
5
4
2
5
5
5
3
2
8
8
8
13
9
4
10
5
5
4
2
4
5
23
13
12
1
2
5
3
2
A
3
3
5
3
1
6
6
6
4
6
7
7
4
4
2
4
2
3
4
26
7
1
2
2
5
3
2
4
3
5
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
6
5
3
3
2
3
4
2
3
3
28
6
1
1
3
2
0
4
2
3
2
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
2
3
3
2
4
3
24
4
2
1
3
5
3
0
5
4
6
3
2
5
5
4
4
5
7
5
5
3
3
3
4
2
6
4
28
7
P
2
2
3
5
3
6
6
8
3
2
6
7
5
6
7
8
8
6
5
4
4
4
3
2
7
5
28
8
M
3
2
3
5
4
8
6
8
4
3
7
9
6
6
8
8
9
9
6
6
5
3
4
3
3
7
6
29
9
3
2
3
6
5
7
11
6
7
4
3
7
8
i
6
8
8
9
9
5
6
5
3
4
3
3
7
6
30
11
V
2
3
7
5
8
11
5
7
4
3
8
8
6
6
7
8
9
9
5
6
5
3
3
3
3
7
6
30
11
3
2
2
6
4
5
9
5
6
3
4
8
7
5
5
6
6
9
8
5
7
4
3
3
3
4
7
5
'30
9
U
3
2
2
5
3
3
8
5
6
3
4
7
6
5
5
6
6
8
7
5
6
5
3
3
3
4
7
5
30
8
11
3
1
2
5
3
4
7
5
6
2
4
7
6
5
4
5
5
8
6
5
6
4
3
2
2
4
3
4
30
a
DAILY
MEM
2.5
2.1
2.0
3.8
3.9
3.6
L. **
*«'
6.3
4.7
5.2
2.7
2.4
5.0
6.2
5.*
5.4
5.9
4.8
5.5
6.2
7.2
5 a
.3
4.2
4.6
4.0
3.6
2.8
2.3
2.7
4.2
4.3
NO.
OF Ml
21
23
18
23
15
21
23
21
23
23
23.
20
22
23
21
23
14
15
IB
23
23
19
23
23
20
23
16
23
649
S4HN
MAX.
4
8
3
7
9
10
8
6
17
8
8
5
4
10
11
11
17
14
10
9
9
16
9
6
7
6
7
4
3
5
8
-------
TABLE 3-72 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (cplorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
BMTNU
NO. Of D
OF
WEEK
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
M0N
TUE
WFD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MEAN
AYS
V Mf AM
12
•a
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
2
1
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
2
3
2
23
^
1
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
3
2
2
2
23
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
3
1
2
2
23
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
23
4
3
2
2
1
I
2
I
2
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
23
•1
A
5
2
2
1
?
I
1
1
•a
2
0
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
p
3
1
2
2
23
M
6
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
7
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
3
2
4
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
23
8
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
4
3
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
23
9
»
2
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
3
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
22
10
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
2
1
1
6
4
3
1
2
a
3
2
2
2
2
21
11
2
2
3
2
2
2
5
3
2
1
1
2
7
3
4
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
23
a
2
3
3
2
1
2
5
2
2
2
1
1
2
6
3
3
4
2
3
•a
3
3
2
2
3
25
1
2
4
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
2
5
3
3
4
2
3
4
3
2
2
3
25
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
6
4
3
4
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
24
4
3
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
7
4
3
4
2
3
5
3
3
3
3
24
P
5
3
5
2
2
3
3
4
3
2
2
1
2
6
4
3
4
2
2
5
3
3
3
3
24
M
i
3
6
2
1
3
3
1
2
1
2
6
4
3
4
2
2
5
3
3
3
3
24
6
7
3
6
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
3
3
2
3
5
3
2
2
3
25
1
3
5
2
1
3
3
1
1
I
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
5
3
3
2
3
25
»
3
6
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
4
3
2
2
3
25
M
3
5
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
4
3
3
2
3
23
11
3
6
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
4
3
3
2
3
25
ONLY
KM
•a -a '
2.4
3.4:
2.1
1.6
1.9
2.1
2.9
2.9
1.7
1.1
1.1
2.1
2.3
4.0
3.0
2.7
2.8
1.7
2.4
^ 0
4,0
2.7
2.0
2.2
2.5
*0.
arm
7 1
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
21
21
13
23
18
23
23
21
23
23
23
7 "\
14
23
23
23
5**
5-Mt«
MAX.
4
7
it
3
3.
4
6
4
3
2
3
3
4
8
4
4
4
3
4
5
4
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-73 HOURLY AVERAGES OF NITROGEN DIOXIDE, pphm (colorimetric analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
Ff?l
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
Ti!E
WED
THU
PFtl
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. MIY MEAN
12
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
1
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
2
2
2
28
4
1
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
28
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
28
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
28
3
A M
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
28
3
5
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
28
3
«
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
y
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
I
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
28
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
2
3
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
28
3
1
2
2
3
Z
2
3
1
3
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
28
3
9
1
3
3
2
3
1
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
2
2
2
4
3
3
24
4
11
2
2
4
2
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
2
2
1
5
3
3
24
5
11
1
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
2
2
2
5
3
3
25
5
12
1
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
27
4
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
27
4
P M
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
^
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
2
3
4
3
3
23
4
2
3
4
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
3
3
28
4
3
3
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
4
5
2
4
2
3
3
3
28
5
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
5
2
4
3
3
3
3
27
5
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
4
5
2
3
2
3
3
3
27
5
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
2
4
5
2
3
2
3
3
3
27
5
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
4
5
1
3
2
3
3
3
27
5
11
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
4
3
1
3
2
3
3
3
26
4
11
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
26
4
DAHY
MEAN
1.9
2.5
3.0
2.5
2.!>
20
»°
3.1
1.9
2.0
3.0
2.3
2.4
1.9
2.0
2.5
2.8
2.4
2.2
2.5
2.9
2,4
2.8
3.2
1.6
2.4
2.0
2.8
2.5
NO.
OFHR
22
23
23
18
23
j ?
23
22
20
2»
14
13
21
23
22
21
21
23
17
22
23
23
23
20
23
23
22
21
23
5-MIN
MAX.
3
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
5
4
4
6
3
4
3
6
4
2.5
618
-------
TABLE 3-74 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT. pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX HftlY MEAN
A M
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
I 1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
B
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
8
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
&
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
It
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
P M
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
B
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
1
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
1
5
0
0
(J
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
9
1
7
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
1
0
9
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
9
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
DAILY
MEAN
0.1
0.0
o.o
0.1
0.1
0,0
0.0
0.2
0.1
NO.
Of H*
15
22
20
23
23
23
23
23
20
S-MIN
MAX.
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
192
-------
TABLE 3-75 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT. pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1962
OAT OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NEEK
THU
Ff?l
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
TNU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
wp
THU
Fpl
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAH
HO. OF DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
n
?1
2
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
n
23
2
4
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
J
)
0
0
0
23
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
23
1
(
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 3-76 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
OF
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
HIE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MPN
TUE
WED !
THU
FRI !
SAT ;
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. Of BAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
I
0
0
0
27
3
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
21
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
:1
0
23
2
A
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
3
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2B
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
1
M
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
25
2
tl
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
24
3
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
I
1
0
1
3
3
2
0
0
4
1
0
2
0
1
2ft
<,
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
t>
1
0
3
I
1
27
-------
TABLE 3-77 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1962
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
eo
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MRTMtl
M.OFD
HALM
OF
NEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
m
SAT
SUN
KM
AYS
YMEAM
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
27
2
1
i
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
3
0
2
0
j
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
22
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
I
0
3
0
2
0
0
?
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
27
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
0
z
0
0
y
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
27
3
A
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
27
3
•
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
27
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
27
2
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
27
2
0
2
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
3
0
2
1
1
1
26
3
II
0
0
3
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
5
2
3
1
2
1
24
5
11
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
3
1
1
0
2
1
2
4
2
3
6
4
4
1
2
2
24
6
12
0
0
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
5
3
5
7
5
3
1
3
2
25
7
1
1
2
0
2
4
2
2
1
1
3
0
2
2
2
2
2
5
8
5
3
1
3
3
24
8
1
2
0
3
3
2
1
1
4
1
3
1
2
4
2
5
4
8
5
3
1
3
3
24
8
1
2
0
3
2
2
1
0
2
4
2
3
1
3
4
2
5
4
6
5
2
2
3
3
25
6
2
2
0
2
2
2
1
1
0
2
3
2
2
1
3
4
2
5
1
4
5
2
1
3
2
26
5
P
2
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
1
3
2
2
2
3
4
1
6
4
3
5
5
2
1
3
2
26
6
II
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
3
1
3
1
3
3
X
4
3
4
4
5
2
1
2
2
26
5
7
1
I
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
3
1
1
0
2
3
1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
2
26
4
1
o;
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
25
2
9
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
2
1
25
2
N
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
0'
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
25
2
11
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
I
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
I
25
2
MY
mm
0.4
1.0
0.0
1.3
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.4
0.4
1.2
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.5
10
t*»
1.1
1.2
1.0
2.6
1.6
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.3
1.5
1.8
.6
1.2
•>.
OF Ml
23
15
16
22
23
19
23
23
21
23
23
23
22
22
0 1
22
23
23
23
20
23
20
23
23
23
22
988
MM
ML
3
3
1
4
5
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
5
5
6
4
9
7
6
5
3
5
-------
TABLE 3-78 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIOANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1962
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
M.OFB
MALM.
OF
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
wp
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
MEM
ITS
THEM.
12
0
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
29
3
1
1
1
1
2
4
1
0
1
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
27
4
3
3
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
3
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
J
29
3
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
29
2
A
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
29
2
M
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
27
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
25
2
I
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
4
1
0
3
0
0
1
0
I
26
5
3
2
1
3
0
0
0
2
0
14
11
1
5
1
2
3
0
1
J
0
0
24
14
U
2
1
5
4
0
1
0
5
0
8
12
3
5
1
5
1
4
0
3
0
23
12
11
3
4
5
4
0
1
0
4
6
1
0
5
9
6
5
0
5
0
3
2
5
0
25
9
12
1
3
5
6
5
2
3
1
5'
5
1
3
4
7
10
10
5
2
5
0
2
2
6
26
10
1
2
3
5
6
4
1
3
0
6
6
I
4
4
8
10
9
5
4
6
5
1
2
1
6
26
10
0
3
5
7
3
1
4
1
7
5
1
4
4
10
10
10
5
5
5
1
2
2
6
26
10
3
3
5
7
5
4
3
4
0
6
6
3
4
11
9
4
5
4
1
1
2
4
26
11
3
2
5
6
5
4
4
3
0
6
6
2
3
5
10
6
10
5
1
5
4
3
2
1
2
28
10
r
2
2
4
6
4
3
4
4
1
5
7
2
2
4
10
8
1C
4
3
5
5
1
3
0
1
23
10
M
2
1
4
5
5
2
3
4
0
4
7
2
2
4
10
7
10
6
2
3
5
4
0
2
0
1
28
10
1
0
3
4
3
0
3
3
0
3
5
1
1
3
&
3
6
2
1
4
2
1
1
0
1
1
29
1 '
o ;
3
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
^
29
11
3
0
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
^
29
OM.Y
mm
1.6
1.2
1 (*
2.3
2.8
2.9
1.3
1.0
i.*
0.2
2.*
3.1
0.7
1.1
1.*
4.6
*.*
3.8
3C
3.1
1.1
2.4
2.7
0.4
1.1
0.6
1.6
0.3
5 0
K>.
OFMt
21
23
J-l
22
23
23
15
23
23
23
21
23
17
21
23
23
22
22
23
15
23
23.
23
23
23
23
14
627
CMMI
T^MIPI
MAI
4
4
6
7
6
5
5
5
2
7
9
3
5
6
17
20
12
6
5
6
6
4
6
4
7
2
-------
TABLE 3-79 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT. pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1962
DAY
•WITH
1
2
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MHTttt'
M.OFB
•AX. HM
OF
WEEK
PRI
SAT
SUN
NfON
TiJE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
rxM
AYS
YMEAN
12
1
1
0
2
3
1
1
2
2
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
0
0
3
0
1
4
0
3
0
1
25
4
1
2
1
?
1
0
2
3
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
4
2
I
1
4
0
0
I,
1
?6
4
1
?
1
0
0
1
3
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
c
1
0
1
0
4
3
0
1
3
0
1
0
1
?7
4
1
2
0
1
0
1
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
if
3
I
2
2
0
\
0
1
27
4
A
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
27
3
•
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
I
0
0
0
<5
0
0
24
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
13
1
4
1
C
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
1
2
0
4
1
?5
4
5
1
0
0
6
3
2
1
3
2
0
1
4
A
6
1
1
1
1
0
2
1
3
5
3
4
7
2
27
7
11
5
1
1
0
8
2
1
3
0
1
2
5
3
7
7
2
2
2
1
1
5
10
7
4
•5
7
4
26
10
11
6
2
3
0
5
2
2
3
0
5
2
5
5
7
7
6
6
5
5
3
5
5
9
8
5
3
4
4
27
9
12
6
4
3
1
6
6
2
4
3
2
3
3
4
7
8
8
6
5
5
5
4
5
6
8
9
6
4
7
5
28
9
1
6
6
2
2
6
6
3
3
4
2
4
3
5
9
7
8
6
1
5
7
4
5
7
8
10
6
3
9
5
28
10
6
7
2
6
6
4
4
3
1
3
4
5-
9
7
8
7
1
6
7
4
5
6
7
9
5
6
8
5
27
9
7
7
2
5
6
3
4
2
0
2
3
3
8
8
9
8
3
5
6
6
5
6
6
9
6
7
8
5
27
9
6
7
3
5
6
5
2
1
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
7
5
6
4
8
4
5
7
8
6
6
7
5
27
9
P
4
7
1
2
4
6
5
3
2
2
1
3
4
6
7
8
5
7
4
3
6
5
3
8
6
4
7
5
27
8
•
4'
5
0
3
5
6
5
3
0
1
0
3
4
5
7
9
5
7
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
4
4
4
27
9
7
2
5
1
2
4
5
3
3
1
0
0
2
3
5
7
8
3
5
5
5
2
2
2
6
5
6
3
3
27
8
1
1
3
1
1
3
3
3
2
0
2
1
1
1
2
4
7
3
3
2
3
1
3
1
5
4
4
3
2
27
7
»
0
3
2
0
3
2
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
3
2
1
2
1
2
0
2
3
1
2
2
27
4
M
0
2
0
0
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
I
2
0
2
2
2
3
1
2
1
27
3
11
0
1
1
0
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
0
3
1
2
4
1
2
0
0
1
27
4
•MIT
KM
2.9
3.3
1.2
0.8
3.0
3.6
2.*
1.8
It*
1.0
1.1
1.6
2.3
3.5
*.l
*.5
3.0
2.5
2.3
3.3
2.8
2.3
3.3
5.1
4.9
3.2
2.9
3.9
2.7
m
mm
22
22
20
20
23
19
23
23
23
23
23
21
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
23
22
23
15
15
21
22
22
21
600
*m
ML
9
9
5
3
9
12
6
7
4
3
9
5
7
13
12
15
1*
8
10
9
9
6
7
18
11
8
10
13
-------
TABLE 3-80 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT. pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI. JULY 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SUN
MON
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WID
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEAN
HO. Of DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
0
3
1
I
I
0
1
1
3
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
25
3
I
3
1
3
2
3
1
2
2
2
n
i
i
i
i
n
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
??
3
3
3
C
1
2
2
0
1
3
I
0
1
0
0
5
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
?4
5
4
3
0
?
0
?
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
5
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
?4
5
5
3
0
2
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
23
4
(
3
1
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
22
3
7
2
?
P
0
1
C
I
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
17
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
4
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
?1
4
»
1
0
5
2
3
0
3
2
2
4
6
0
2
3
2
0
1
2
2
1
4
0
2
23
6
II
2
1
2
3
5
It
4
4
6
1
2
4
1
0
1
2
4
1
7
1
1
21
7
11
9
0
1
3
0
4
4
6
5
1
2
3
4
4
2 •
3
3
1
4
3
3
21
9
P M
12
10
1
2
8
2
5
5
4
7
5
3
4
3
5
4
4
3
0
4
3
4
21
10
1
11
1
3
8
5
7
5
4
6
5
6
5
3
5
4
4
3
3
2
4
3
•5
22
11
2
11
5
1
9
4
5
6
4
4
7
5
6
3
9
6
4
9
4
3
7
5
3
8
5
7
6 7
!
4
5
3
5
5
4
4
3
2
5
4
5
25
11
4
5
5
5
5
6
5
3
5
5
4
5
25
9
4
8
6
4
10
5
3
6
4
3
7
5
6
8
3
5
5
3
5
3
4
3
5
4
4
5
25
10
5
7
6
4
10
5
5
7
3
4
7
6
6
7
2
5
5
5
1
5
3
4
3
3
4
4
5
26
10
(
6
5
4
10
3
4
7
3
3
7
5
5
5
1
2
4
4
3
5
3
4
5
3
5
4
4
26
10
7
5
5
3
8
3
4
7
2
2
6
4
3
4
1
0
4
4
2
3
3
3
5
1
4
3
3
26
8
1
4
3
2
4
2
3
5
1
1
4
2
3
1
2
0
3
1
j
1
2
2
2
3
0
1
0
2
26
5
9
2
3
2
3
1
1
2
2
0
4
I
3
1
2
1
2
1
i
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
26
4
11
3
3
2
2
0
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
3
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
26
3
11
2
2
1
2
0
1
1
2
0
3
1
0
1
2
2
1
0
o
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
25
3
DAILY
MEAN
6.1
3.1
1.8
*.7
2.0
2.2
2.9
2.5
2.4
5.0
3.0
3.2
2.6
1.7
1.5
3.1
1.8
2iO
1.*
2.4
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.4
2.3
1.9
NO.
OF HI
14
23
23
21
20
22
23
23
21
16
22
22
23
21
19
23
22
21
18
23
23
15
21
23
23
18
S-MIN
MAX.
14
9
5
14
6
6
9
7
6
10
7
9
8
6
6
7
8
6
6
6
14
6
8
6
8
6
2.5
543
-------
TABLE 3-81 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIUANT, pftm (W
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 1962
DAY
•anm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
•ONTHU
•O.OFH
MX. Ml
OF
•OK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
HUH
KK
YMEAN
12
0
0
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
0
,0
1
2
4
2
^
0
i
17
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
3
0
I
19
3
0
0
2
i
0
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
4
3
3
0
1
19
.
VM
15
13
16
>2
23
13
22
21
23
23
23
23
23
23
17
23
23
22
15
19
23
22
23
470
MM
•ML
9
10
10
13
3
7
5
7
9
7
5
3
7
6
11
9
13
7
10
6
5
5
-------
TABLE 3-82 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
S^T
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
•MTM.YKM
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HNLYMAN
A H
12
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
2
1
2
0
o
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1
3
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
18
2
4
1
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
18
3
S
1
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
3
(
7
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
1
9
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
0
1
0
1
17
2
11
3
2
0
2
0
1
0
1
2
2
1
2
^
2
0
0
4
1
1
1
19
4
11
3
2
1
Z
2
2
0
1
3
4
2
2
4
3
0
1
5
1
1
2
19
5
P •
12
4
3
1
3
5
2
0
1
2
3
2
3
4
4
0
1
6
1
0
2
19
6
1
5
3
2
3
6
1
1
2
2
3
2
1
4
4
5
0
2
5
1
1
3
20
6
Z
4
2
2
3
4
1
1
1
1
5
2
3.
3
5
5
2
2
6
2
1
3
20
6
3
3
1
2
3
2
1
0
0
2
5
3
3
3
5
4
2
1
6
3
1
3
20
6
4
<»
3
2
2
1
2
1
0
2
5
4
2
3
4
4
1
1
3
1
2
19
5
S
3
1
i
2
2
2
0
0
2
4
3
2
3
3
4
1
1
2
1
2
19
4
(
3
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
2
2
1
2
2
3
1
0
0
1
o 1
19
3
7
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
c
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
0
0
1
1
19
3
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
19
2
»
2
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
19
2
M
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1»
3
11
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
19
2
DALY
KAN
2.8'
1.2
1.0
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.5
0.3
0.6
1.5
1.*
1.*
1.5
1.9
2.2
0.7
0.4
1.9
0.7
0.5
NO.
OF Ml
14
23
23
23
22
23
23
23
23
22
23
21
23
23
22
14
23
17
20
21
MM
MAX.
5
4
3
4
7
5
2
2
3
6
5
4
4
5
6
3
3
7
3
2
1.2
426
-------
TABLE 3-83 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pottm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
i
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
«0. Of D
MAX.HRI
OF
NEEK
WON
TUE
WED
THU
Ffll
S*T
SUN
MpN
"Vt
WfD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MDN
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MDN
TUE
WED
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN.
12
0
0
0
0
1
1
It
2
I
I
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
21
4
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
1
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
23
1 3
4
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
3
A
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
2
M
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
21
1
*
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
•o
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
19
1
N
1
0
0
1
2
1
2
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
20
2
11
2
0
1
3
2
2
1
1
3
4
3
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
1
21
4
D
3f
1
1
4
2
3
1
2
4
2
4
3
1
0
1
0
0
2
2
0
2
20
4
4
2
3
3
2
1
5
1
2
3
3
3
3
2
0
1
0
2
0
3
1
0
?
22
5
4
2
3
2
2
3
6
2
4
3
^
4
4
3
0
1
0
2
1
3
0
0
1
2
23
6
2
3!
3l
2!
11
5
5
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
0
1
1
2
2
2
1
0
1
2
23
5
3
4
2
0
3
5
5
3
4
2
3
4
3
0
1
.0
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
22
5
P
2
2
2
1
3
4
5
2
3
0
2
2
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
22
5
•
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
22
3
I
0
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
22
2
1.
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
22
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
22
2
M)
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
22
2
11
o-
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
22
3
DALY
MEAN
1.0
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.8
1.6
2.0
1.6
0.9
1.5
1.2
1.9
1.2
1.5
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.3
1.0
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.9
NO.
Of HI
15
23
23
23
23
21
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
19
21
21
23
22
23
23
22
23
20
904
MMN
MAX.
5
3
5
5
3
6
7
6
7
4
5
4
5
4
2
2
2
3
2
4
3
1
1
-------
TABLE 3-84 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MOWTM.'
NO. Of 0
OF
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TOE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU !
FPI ;
-------
TABLE 3-85 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI. DECEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
Ffll
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
W[D
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HftlY MEAN
A M
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
24
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
is
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
1
4
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
24
1
5
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
24
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
24
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
1
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
25
1
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
25
1
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
2
P M
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2*
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
25
1
3
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
26
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
26
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
26
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1
DAH.Y
MEAN
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.4
07
• '
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.3
NO.
OF Ml
23
22
23
23
13
23
1 c
I y
23
23
23
22
23
22
23
22
21
23
23
23
23
21
21
23
23
23
21
5-MtN
MAX.
1
1
0
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
0.2
568
-------
TABLE 3-86 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXJDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1963
DAY OF
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FBI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
T(JE
WED
TWU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HftlY MEAN
A M
12
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
0
0
0
IT
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
L
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
1
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
P M
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
15
I
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
I
0
0
1
0
15
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
17
1
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
17
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
17
1
7
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,
0
0
0
1
0
0
17
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
1
9
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
1
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
1
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
16
1
DAH.Y
MEM
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
O.I
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
NO.
Of W
23
18
20
23
23
23
23
17
19
17
22
22
23
21
23
23
23
&-MM
MAX.
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
0.1
363
-------
TABLE 3-87 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FR!
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
2
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
2
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
2
(
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
I
7
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
II
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
P M
12
1
0
0
1
0
0
6
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
6
1
2
0
1
0
0
4
1
3
1
0
0
I
0
5
I
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
6
1
5
0
1
0
1
0
0
6
I
6
0
1
1
0
0
0
6
1
7
0
0
1
0
c
0
6
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
6
2
9
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
1
11
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
1
11
0
0
I
0
0
0
6
1
DAILY
MEAN
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
NO.
OFW
22
23
21
23
23
23
S-MM
MAX.
2
3
2
2
1
1
135
-------
TABLE 3-88 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX HOLY MEAN
A M
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ij
I
2
2
2
1
0
1
3
1
22
3
1
2
0
n
0
0
0
0
i
n
0
0
i
0
0
2
0
3
1
n
0
i
21
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
n
3
2
0
0
0
3
1
22
4
0
I
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
22
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
22
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
22
J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
0
21
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
21
11
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
I
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
1 '
1
2
3
1
20
a
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
2
0
3
0
1
1
1
3
2
1
?o
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
2
0
2
0
2
2
3
4
2
1
19
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
2
0
r •
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1 1
0 i 1
0 , 0
3
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
19
2
0
1
2
4
4
1
1
20
0
1
i
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
2
2
1
1
2
4
1
1
22
*
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
1
2
1
0
2
4
3
1
21
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
1
0
1
3
0
1
21
0
Q
tf
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
2
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
1
0
2
1
0
21
»
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0-
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
2
1
0
21
2
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
21
2
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
0
21
2
DAILY
IBM
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.0
1.3
0.8
1.1
1.5
o.a
0.7
K6
1.7
NO.
OFMt
23
23
23
19
23
23
23
23
23
22 .
22
23
23
22
23
18
21
22
23
23
23
16
S4HN
MAX.
0
2
3
0
1
0
2
1
3
2
2
3
1
3
3
4
4
2
3
5
5
0.6
484
-------
TABLE 3-89 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MOMTM.YMEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HtlY MEAN
A M
12
I
0
0
,-\
Ij
i
4
1
0
1
0
o
1
0
2
0
0
2
c
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
2
3
1
27
4
1
0
0
2
3
i
2
n
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
[1
0
2
0
1
1
o
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
2
4
1
27
4
3
0
0
0
0
2
u
1
0
o
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
o
2
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
27
4
4
;l
n
0
0
I
0
I
0
r;
0
0
u
2
0
1
0
o
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
27
3
5
c,
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
r)
0
0
0
0
0
0
i
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
27
1
6
7
i U
•J 0
0
0
c
•J
0
o
0
o
0
Q
1
0
0
')
o
0
I
n
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
27
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
27
2
1
0
0
0
."1
o
0
0
0
i
n
')
3
0
o
0
0
1
C)
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
2V
3
9
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
y
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
2
1
4
1
1
1
1
26
4
11
11
1 2
1 1
0
1
0
1
I
I
2
2
0
5
1
0
0
0
I
2
3
4
4
1
1
1
1
26
5
3
2
1
1
2
3
3
1
5
1
0
2
2
4
4
3
0
1
2
23
5
P M
12
}
2
5
3
2
1
3
3
1
5
1
1
1
1
2
4
4
3
1
3
22
5
1
2
2
7
4
3
1
3
3
1
5
1
I
1
1
2
2
5
«i
3
3
3
23
7
2
3
2
6
3
1
4
2
3
3
4
1
5
2
0
2
0
2
2
4
4
3
3
2
2
3
27
6
3
3
2
4
4
1
3
2
3
3
4
1
6
1
1
2
0
1
2
5
5
3
3
1
2
3
27
6
4
2
2
6
4
1
4
1
4
2
4
1
2
1
2
0
1
2
4
3
3
2
1
1
2
26
6
5
2
1
7
3
0
2
1
3
3
3
1
2
1
2
0
1
2
4
4
3
2
1
0
2
26
7
(
1
6
2
0
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
1
2
0
1
2
4
4
2
2
u
1
2
25
6
7
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
2
?
1
1
1
1
23
3
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
I
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
?
1
2
1
1
24
3
J
1
?
n
0
i
i
u
i
i
0
i
i
i
2
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
27
2
l<
1
2
1
0
4
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
4
1
1
27
4
11
0
1
0
0
4
1
p
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
2
2
2
1
1
27
4
ONLY
KM
0.9
0.9
?.o
1.3
1.0
1.*
0.8
1.3
. 1
1.5
. 1
1.4
0.6
2.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
»°
0.4
1.0
1.2
2.2
1.8
1.9
1.3
1.2
1.5
NO.
OFM
20
23
/?
22
71
?3
23
23
23
21
23
19
23
23
23
21
22
23
23
23
23
23
20
21
MMN
HAL
3
2
9
5
5
5
3
4
7
4
5
6
3
7
3
2
3
2
2
4
6
6
6
4
6
5
1.3
598
-------
TABLE 3-90 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
KEEK
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
FRI
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. MH.Y MEAN
A M
12
1
0
1
1
2
0
0
3
2
1
0
C
0
2
0
2
0
C
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
I
28
*
1
2
0
0
1
1
1
it
2
I
1
0
2
0
2
0
I
2
2
1
2
0
1
23
'«
3
I
0
1
1
0
4
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
0
2
0
1
21
4
4
1
0
1
1
0
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
27
4
s
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
2
0
0
n
0
0
i
27
2
(
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
(1
0
I
0
n
2
7
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
27
3
1
1
1
1
i
0
1
2
2
I
1
0
0
0
0
•J
1
0
1
3
0
0
3
3
I
?6
3
>
2
2
1
y
1
3
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
I
2
2
3
1
1
<>
3
2
24
4
Ml
2
2
1
3
4
3
5
1
I
1
I
1
1
3
I
4
*t
4
b
2
22
5
11
2
3
2
4
3
5
1
1
0
1
1
4
2
3
3
5
0
4
5
5
3
23
5
P M
12
2
3
3
4
4
6
2
2
0
0
2
3
2
1
3
4
6
0
4
4
5
3
2*
6
1
3
3
3
4
4
6
2
2
0
1
0
3
2
2
2
4
2
6
0
0
4
5
5
3
27
6
4
3
4
5
5
5
6
3
2
3
3
4
5
5
4
8
3
2
0 1
0 ' 0
1
3
4
1
2
3
3
5
2
2
4
4
6
3
28
6
1
3
4
2
3
3
3
5
2
1
4
5
6
3
28
8
3
3
4
5
4
4
8
3
2
1
1
1
3
4
2
2
3
3
5
2
1
4
5
6
3
28
8
3
4
4
4
5
7
2
1
1
1
1
3
4
3
3
2
4
5
3
0
3
5
6
3
28
7
3
2
4
3
4
5
7
2
1
0
0
1
3
3
3
3
2
4
5
2
1
3
4
6
3
28
7
7
1
2
3
?
2
3
3
6
3
1
0
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
4
4
1
1
3
4
4
2
2R
6
1
1
1
2
j
1
2
2
6
2
I
0
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
4
2
1
2
2
3
2
28
6
J
1
1
2
i
1
1
2
4
1
0
I
1
. 1
1
3
0
1
1
. 1
3
1
0
I
I
2
1
2d
4
11
1
2
2
i
1
0
3
3
1
0
0
1
2
1
3
0
1
I
1
3
3
0
1
0
I
1
28
3
11
0
1
1
1
2
0
2
3
1
0
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
n
0
i
28
3
DALY
•KM
1.6
1.5
2.0
1 Q
2.2
1.9
3.0
4.1
1.6
1.1
0.3
0.4
0.8
1.5
2.2
1.3
1.1
1.9
• P
1.9
•) ' f\
t.u
.3.6
1.2
0.7
2.2
2.5.
2.8.
NO
Of HI
23
23
23
23
23
1 Q
20
23
23
23
23
22
21
22
23
23
23
21
15
. 20
22
22
20
22
23
21
S-MJN
MAX.
5
5
5
5
7
7
6
10
3
3
2
2
2
4
5
3
4
4
5
6
4
3
6
6
6
1.3
612
-------
TABLE 3-91 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
J7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•MttMM
NO.OFO
MAX. HM
OF
WEEK
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
1 MfUt
AYS
YMEAN
12
n
:)
0
o
i
0
0
o
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
o
16
3
1
0
o
3
0
4
3
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
16
1
3
1
0
0
?.
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
rt
16
2
4
0
, }
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
1
A
5
0
n
0
0
n
n
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
16
0
M
6
0
0
u
0
0
ll
'\J
0
0
u
1
0
0
0
0
15
1
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
1
0
0
0
I
I
0
0
0
4
1
1
<»
2
0
15
4
9
1
1
1
0
0
2
0
5
3
0
1
7
0
13
7
10
2
4
2
I
1
y
3
1
5
5
7
e
0
13
8
11
5
6
3
2
3
3
5
1
6
6
7
6
1
14
7
12
6
a
i,
2
3
5
2
1
5
6
9
5
3
1*
9
1
7
7
3
0
1
2
3
5
2
1
6
6
9
6
2
16
9
2
10
7
2
0
1
1
4
5
1
0
5
7
9
6
7
16
10
3
9
6
2
0
3
0
3
4
2
0
6
7
9
1
0
I
1
!
5
-------
TABLE 3-92 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
F.RI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MDN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
2
0
0
1
2
1
3
4
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
4
2
1
0
0
0
1
25
4
1
2
2
0
1
3
4
0
0
2
1
4
1
0
2
4
3
0
0
?.
17
4
3
!
3
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
I
24
3
4
1
0
0
0
3
0
3
G
. 0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
24
3
5
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
I
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
21
3
6
0
2
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
2
7
2
1
0
0
1
0
6
2
8
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
3
1
1
2
I
1
0
1
16
3
9
5
5
1
0
0
2
5
1
1
1
0
2
3
3
8
2
3
2
2
1
1
2
21
8
10
y
f,
7
1
2
0
2
6
3
5
2
2
1
2
3
6
15
4
3
4
2
3
1
4
23
15
11
6
e
i
3
2
3
4
6
7
0
2
3
3
4
6
8
6
2
3
3
4
2
3
4 .
24
8
P M
12
4
8
1
2
2
5
5
5
3
3
4
4
3
13
6
6
2
4
3
3
1
5
4
23
13
1
10
4
3
3
3
5
6
5
3
2
3
6
5
3
10
9
6
2
2
3
3
1
4
4
24
10
2
9
1
4
5
3
3
7
5
3
3
7
4
4
6
3
3
6
5
4
1 , 2
3
1
6
5
4
4
7
5
1
2
3
4
1
5
4
25
9
3
1
5
5
4
5
3
6
2
1
2
4
0
5
4
25
7
4
8
f>
3
•5
4.
4
5
5
5
0
2
3
6
5
4
7
5
6
3
1
2
4
3
5
4
25
8
5
8
5
4
5
3
3
3
5
4
2
1
3
5
4
3
4
5
6
3
0
3
3
4
5
4
25
8
6
7
5
3
5
3
3
4
4
5
2
1
2
4
4
4
2
7
7
3
0
3
2
3
5
4
25
7
7
6
4
4
5
T
2
3
4
4
1
1
0
4
3
3
4
5
7
4
0
1
2
2
3
24
7
8
4
1
4
3
3
0
3
2
2
2
0
2
3
3
2
2
2
5
2
0
1
2
3
2
24
5
9
2
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
2
3
1
24
4
10
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
4
1
1
0
1
1
1
24
4
11
1
1
3
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
4
2
1
0
0
1
1
24
A
DAILY
MEAN
.5
*,5
3.0
2.0
2.5
1.9
2.*
3.3
3.0
2. A
1.5
0.8
1.2
2.5
3.1
2.3
3.4
4.1
3.8
2.3
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.2
2.9
NO.
OFHR
19
20
22
23
19
15
17
19
19
21
20
23
23
22
21
22
21
22
20
23
21
22
21
14
5-MIN
MAX.
5
12
9
6
6
5
5
7
8
7
9
3
4
7
6
5
15
17
g
5
5
3
5
5
6
2.4
507
-------
TABLE 3-93 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, AUGUST 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
l
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
3UN
MON
TUE
vytu
THU
PRI
3AT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
CAT
MONTHLY MEM
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
i
1
n
3
1
1
I
2«
'
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
1
4
2
1
1
22
4
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
I
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
1
1
27
3
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
1
27
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
27
2
a
l
c
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
I
0
24
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
1
1
1
22
3
2
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
2
1
25
4
2
1
5
1
0
1
0
2
2
0
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
1
4
I
5
4
2
25
5
N
3
3
5
1
0
3
1
3
6
1
2
3
3
1
1
3
4
2
1
5
5
3
23
6
11
6
4
6
0
4
2
4
6
3
1
2
4
4
2
0
1
5
•i
0
1
3
6
4
4
3
26
6
12
9
6
7
0
5
3
5
7
2
3
2
5
3
5
3
1
•1
5
7
5
2
1
5
7
6
5
4
4
29
9
1
11
5
6
1
5
4
5
R
3
2
2
5
3
6
4
1
1
10
4
5
1
1
6
7
6
5
4
4
29
11
2
16
5
6
3
4
5
5
6
4
3
2
r
3
6
5
5
3
4
5
6
6
4
3
2
6 6
5 ; 4
6
5
1
I
10
1
5
1
2
7
8
6
5
4
5
29
16
6
5
0
2
6
6
6
1
1
6
8
5
5
5
4
29
8
4
2
5
5
1
3
4
5
7
6
2
2
2
5
1
6
4
0
2
6
5
6
3
1
6
9
3
5
4
4
30
9
s
1
5
5
2
3
4
4
6
8
1
2
2
4
1
5
4
1
2
7
4
4
5
2
5
7
2
4
4
4
30
8
M
i
3
5
5
2
3
4
4
5
8
2
2
2
5
2
3
3
1
2
6
5
4
5
2
5
6
3
4
3
4
30
8
7
4
4
5
1
2
3
3
3
7
4
1
1
4
2
3
2
0
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
5
2
3
2
3
30
7
1
4
4
3
0
2
l
1
2
2
5
3
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
29
!>
I
3
3
1
0
1
f>"
1
1
?
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
I
4
3
1
1
1
29
4
11
3
1
1
0
1
i
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
I
1
2
1
0
1
I
1
2
0
4
1
1
2
1
29
4
11
2
0
0
0
1
o
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
4
2
1
2
1
29
4
OM.Y
MOW
4.8
2.5
3.*
0.6
1.1
1 7
2.1
1.8
2.6
3,*
1.6
1.8
1.1
2.6
1.8
1.9
0.4
i.u
3.0
2.1
2.5
1.6
1.1
3.7
5.6
3.5
2.7
2.5
. '
NO.
OF Ml
16
23
23
15
23
22
20
22
23
23
20
22
21
21
21
23
23
22
-------
TABLE 3 94 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
J
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
HRI
SAT
SUN
MON
MONTHLY MIAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRIY MEAN
A M
12
H
/_
",
I
2
1
1
1
3
5
1
2
ti
3
•»
6
/,
5
1
i
5
3
5
5
1
3
3
2
3
30
h
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
?
1
1
1
4
s
1
1
2
3
3
S
6
7
1
2
4
3
7
4
]
3
3
1
3
29
7
3
I
.3
1
1
0
I
2
1
1
1
,,
4
I
I
2
0
3
5
4
*>
1
^
4
3
6
4
1
3
3
1
2
30
•S
4
2
2
/
2
0
0
1
I
1
3
•+
1
1
2
2
3
5
2
6
1
2
*t
3
5
4
1
3
3
2
2
30
6
5
;>
3
1
2
c
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
I
1
2
3
3
5
3
4
1
2
3
2
5
it
1
4
2
2
2
30
5
6
2
7
1
* 2
1 ! 1
^2
0
2
L
0
1
2
•s
3
1
I
I
4
3
5
5
3
1
2
3
2
6
6
0
5
c
I
2
30
6
2
0
2
2
1
1
4
3
2
I
I
1
5
4
8
6
4
2
3
4
3
ft
8
0
4
2
5
3
30
' 8
1
3
i
2
"j
0
1
3
2
3
3
^
3
1
1
1
5
4
7
4
5
2
3
4
3
4
9
0
5
3
3
29
9
9
3
3
1
2
4
4
7
4
4
5
1
1
2
6
7
6
6
3
4
4
4
4
9
1
7
4
4
26
9
10
3
11
3
! 4
4 5
i ;
3
5
6
17
o
5
7
1
2
3
7
9
fl
9
4
5
5
5
8
2
8
4
6
25
17
5
6
b
19
1.0
7
9
2
2
5
8
17
11
5
5
5
5
11
7
7
2
7
24
19
.^__^_j
P M
12
4
5
7
0
6
6
7
17
P
R
3
3
6
7
1*
11
6
6
6
7
9
7
7
e.
7
?4
17
1 2
4
6
4
0
7
7
7
10
9
7
3
6
7
20
11
11
5
6
5
6
8
7
8
2
7
24
20
4
b
3
0
3
8
7
8
9
9
8
3
,
6
7
20
12
11
6
6
5
6
3
a
7
2
7
25
20
3
5
4
3
0
2
9
%
8
7
9
7
3
6
7
19
12
12
6
7
5
5
8
7
7
2
7
25
19
4
5
4
3
1
3
U
10
7
6
9
4
•*
3
5
7
10
17
13
9
7
7
4
4
8
a
6
2
4
6
23
5
5
4
3
0
3
9
9
7
6.
9
4
2
3
5
7
10
14
9
7
6
7
4
3
6
4
7
5
2
2
6
29
17 j 14
i
4
3
2
0
2
7
6
7
6
7
4
2
3
3
4
5
a
a
7
7
4
5
3
3
4
2
5
4
2
1
4
30
- 8
7
2
2
2
0
1
3
3
4
3
5
3
T
3
2
2
3
6
4
6
5
3
4
3
3
5
1
4
4
2
0
3
30
6
1
A
2
1
C)
0
3
2
3
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
6
3
3
4
3
2
4
1
4
3
2
0
3
29
6
9
3
2
1
l!
0
2
1
3
2
4
3
1
2
2
2
3
6
4
5
3
4
5
3
3
5
1
4
4
4
0
3
30
6
!•
.,
2
1
;i
0
3
1
2
2
4
3
1
2
2
2
4-
7
5
4
2
3
b
3
3
5
1
4
4
5
0
3
30
7
11
4
2
1
0
1
3
1
2
2
4
5
I
2
2
3
4
7 .
5
4
1
3
5
3
3
5
0
4
3
3
0
3
30
7
MN.Y
MUD
3.0
3.2
2.3
0.-7
0.8
3.9
3.9
^.9
5.4
5.2
4.3
3.4
1.9
1.6
3.1
4.8
5.3
9.4
6.5
b.3
3.3
4.3
3.8
3.6
5.6
4.8
3.6
4.8
2.7
1.5
NO. ! S-MM
OF*
23
20
23
20
20
23
23
23
23
23
23
19
23
18
23
22
16
23
21
23
23
23
20
23
23
19
23
23
23
15
MAX
5
7
11
3
3
13
11
9
21
' 6
12
12
4
4
4
8
11
24
14
13
3 .
7
7
7
10
12
11
1°
6
8
4.0 •
647
-------
TABLE 3-95 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRIY MEAN
A M
12
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
c
c
1
0
2
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
i.
i
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
31
3
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
29
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
•T
3t
2
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
i
0
D
i
Q
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
,T
31
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
31
I
(
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•J
0
0
0
30
n
»
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
26
1
M
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
I
0
0
0
26
2
11
3
0
1
2
5
0
4
3
0
3
2
4
2
2
5
1
1
3
1
2
0
0
0
I
3
1
1
1
1
2
29
5
r M
12
5
0
2
5
5
2
3
4
1
4
3
6
6
2
6
c.
1
it
2
\
3
n
i
i
4
i
i
2
2
3
29
f>
1
5
4
1
6
6
2
3
4
3
4
3
6
3
6
5
4
I
3
3
4
6
2
2
4
3
2
I
2
3
3
29
6
2
5
1
8
1
6
4
4
6
3
6
4
4
3
J
4
1
9
2
5
4
4
9
3
7
4
4
1
4 4
2 5
6
4
3
2
b
7
7
1
2
5
4
2
1
1
1
4
30
3
C
3
3
1
5
7
7
1
4
5
3
2
I
2
0
4
30
9
4
2
5
1
9
3
4
4
3
9
4
4
4
3
3
4
5
2
3
3
i
4
6
4
1
3
5
2
2
1
2
0
3
31
9
S
3
4
0
4
2
5
2
1
9
1
2
3
3
2
2
3
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
0
3
2
1
0
1
0
2
31
9
C
2
3
0
1
0
2
3
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
31
4
7
1
3
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
a
1
31
3
1
1
3
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
I
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
31
3
)
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
i
0
0
'0
0
0
1
31
3
11
0
4
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
31
4
11
0
4
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
5
1
31
5
DAILY
HUN
0.6
2.*
0,6
1.5
0.5
1.7
2.0
0.7
2.3
1.2
1.2
1.9
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.5
1.0
0.7
1.1
1.2
1.*
1.6
0.4
0.9
1.3
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.6
NO.
arm
15
23
19
23
23
23
21
23
23
22
23
23
23
22
23
23
23
23
23
22
23
23
23
22
23
23
23
21
23
23
22
5-MIN
MAX.
4
6
3
12
4
7
7
5
12
7
a
5
5
7
8
8
7
6
4
4
7
9
a
4
4
6
5
4
2
3
5
1.2
692
-------
TABLE 3-96 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FR!
SAT
MONTHLY MEM
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HM.Y MEAN
A M
12
1
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
)
0
:
o
,1
0
0
2
U
0
0
0
0
0
2'3
3
1
2
I
fi
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
2
3
1
(.
0
0
1 :
0
~.
-J
"'
Ij
0
•')
'1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
2
4
0
0
0
,1
.T
0
0
n
Cj
o
0
(1
n
u
0
0
u
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
2
5
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
j
n
Q
0
0
u
n
0
0
n
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
2
6
o
7
0
0 0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
I
0
0
0
2<,
1
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
1
•)
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2*
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
7
I
0
n
;>
a
0
0
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
0
0
0
ri
0
0
24
I
t
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
1
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
'.)
0
~>
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
OM.Y
MEM
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.7
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.I
0.1
oso
0.0
NO.
OFM
23
23
23
13
23
12
?.\
23
23
23
22
22
23
23
23
23
23
16
13
23
23
15
23
22
23
S-MIN
MAX.
4
2
3
0
0
0
I
1
4
2
2
1
0
0
1
2
3
2
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0.1
534
-------
TABLE 3-97 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL OXIDANT, pphm (Kl analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
MONTM.VMEM
MO. OF MYS
MAX. HM.Y MCAN
A M
12
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
11
1
6
0
0
IJ
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
11
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
1
10
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
1
11
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
11
1
P M
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0 0
10
1
11
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
9
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
10
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
11
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
I
DAH.Y
MEAN
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
NO.
OF Ml
23
16
23
13
23
23
23
22
23
13
23
23
5-MIN
MAX.
1
0
1
0
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
248
-------
TABLE 3-98 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. OFD
MAX. HDL
OF
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
i
2
2
3
1
S
1
I
3
3
Z
2
1
0
3
4
2
2
2
2
22
5
1
2
2
?.
2
2
4
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
0
. . 3
3
2
2
2
2
22
5
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
I
2
2
2
2
1
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
22
4
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
0
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
22
5
4
2
2
2
3
1
i
1
I
2
2
2
I
1
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
22
4
A
5
3
2
2
4
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
22
4
M
6
3
. 2
2
5
1
2
1
1
3
4
3
2
0
0
3
2
2
2
2
2
22
5
7
3
2
2
4
1
1
1
1
4
4
2
2
0
0
3
3
2
2
2
2
?2
5
8
3
2
3
5
1
1
1
1
-------
TABLE 3-99 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionlzation analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MORTHC
NO.OFD
MAX. HM
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU ,
FRI
'•EAR
AYS
YMEAN
12
2
3
i
2
i
1
2
3
4
4
'*
3
4
2
3
3
2
i.
2
2
4
2
5
2
3
26
<3
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
4
4
4
3
3
?
2
2
2
2
?
2
4
2
5
?
?
?ft
5
2
3
2
?
2
3
2
2
3
3
4
5
4
4
2
^
2
2
2
?
2
5
2
•5
2
3
?6
5
3
5
;>
7
;1
J
2
2
2
i
3
-»
<»
3
2
2
2
2
2
?
2
5
2
3
2
3
26
&
4
7
•)
>
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
S
4
3
f
2
2
2
2
,>
2
4
2
5
?
3
26
5
A
5
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
5
3
3
26
5
M
6
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
5
3
3
26
5
7
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
I
2
2
2
3
4
2
4
2
3
26
4
t
2
7
?
i
>
2
J
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
t.
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
?5
3
9
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
^
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
26
3
10
2
2
2
2 i
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
?
?
2
2
2
2
?
2
2
2
?
?
2
27
3
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
27
3
12
2
2
7
2
2
?
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
27
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
?
2
27
3
2
2
2
?
2
2
2
2
2
2-
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
26
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
25
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
p
2
26
3
P
5
2
2
2
2
7
7
i
i
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
27
3
M
i
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
27
3
7
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
a
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
27
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
?
2
27
3
9
3
i
y
2
2
2
2
3
2
4
4
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
2
3
2
3
27
4
1«
3
2
2
2
3
2
i
3
2
3
•>
5
V
4
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
3
-}
3
2?
5
11
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
3
4
2
3
4
2
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
4
3
3
27
5
OMLY
MEM
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.4
3 0
2.4
2.8
2.8
3.0
2.8
2.5
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.*
2.9
2.2
3.0
2.3
2.7
2.«
HO.
OFM
24
24
24
23
15
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
22
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
633
HMD
MM.
4
3
3
5
3
3
3
4
5
4
6
6
6
5
8
4
5
4
3
3
3
5
7
5
7
6
5
-------
TABLE 3-100 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. OF Oi
MAX. HRL
OF
WEEK
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TIIF
TMII
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MEAN
AYS
Y MEAN
12
4
2
3
3
4
3
',
4
15
1
3
2
3
3
J3
3
y
4
4
15
c.
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
14
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
p
5
4
15
c:
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
C
5
4
15
5
A
5
2
2
3
3
*
3
5
4
-
15
M
t
2
2
3
3
4
3
•i
5
4
15
7
2
2
3
3
4
3
5
15
1
2
2
4
3
3
3
4
15
re
»
2
0
3
3
3
3
4
14
4
M
2
0
3
3
3
3
4
15
11
2
0
3
3
3
3
4
15
a
2
\ 0
3
3
3
3
4
15
1
1
0
3
3
3
3
4
15
2
0
3
3
3
3
4
15
1
0
3
3
3
3
14
1
0
3
3
3
3
4
15
P
1
0
3
3
3
3
4
15
M
2
0
3
3
3
4
4
15
;
2
0
3
3
5
4
15
1
2
0
3
3
5
5
15
9
2
0
3
3
4
4
15
11
2
0
3
3
(+
't
15
11
2
0
3
3
4
4
15
DAILY
MEAN
2.0
0.7
.3
.4
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.0
• '
H.6
• *»
A 1
4.3
4.1
4.0
NO.
Of W
24
23
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
357
5-MIN
MAX.
5
3
4
6
5
4
6
5
5
-------
TABLE 3-101 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
T^U
FBI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MONTHtYMEAN
NO. OF MYS
MAX. HRIY MEAN
A M
12
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
13
4
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
4
13
4
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
5
14
5
3
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
14
4
4
2
2
2
2
^
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
14
3
5
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
14
3
6
7
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
14
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
14
4
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
14
3
9
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
13
3
10
11
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
13
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
13
3
P H
12
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
14
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
13
3
2
a
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
14
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
•5
•5
2
2
14
2
4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
14
3
5
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
14
3
(
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
14
2
7
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
14
4
8
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
3
5
3
3
5
4
6
14
6
. ]
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
5
4
5
14
5
!•
2
2
2
3
•V
2
3
3
^
3
3
4
5
6
14
6
11
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
5
6
14
6
C--" ?
l..,dl
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.7
2.6
2.1
2.6
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.2
3.1
3.4
NO. IS-MIN
OFM
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
21
24
23
24
24
24
24
MAX.
4
3
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
6
7
8
330
-------
TABLE 3-102 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON.
C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
is
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WID
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HftlY MEAN
12
3
6
it
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
5
4
3
2
4
3
3
4
3
5
3
3
3
26
6
1
3
5
4
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
2
4
4
4
2
4
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-103 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1962
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Mttfntt.1
H0.0f D
MAX. HW
OF
WEEK
THU
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
CAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
FRI
•EM
AYS
YMEAN
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
i
3
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
7
7
7
26
9
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
5
3
3
3
3
3
5
8
5
28
8
2
5
4
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-104 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1962
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WCD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
MQN
TUE
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRIY MEAN
A M
12
7
10
10
8
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
0
10
14
'g
4
3
4
<3
3
4
7
3
3
3
31
14
1
7
10
12
9
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
10
12
3
3
4
5
3
3
7
3
3
3
31
12
2
7
8
10
7
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
10
•1
12
3
3
4
5
3
5
5
3
4
3
31
12
3
6
7
U
7
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
8
11
3
3
5
4
3
6
5
5
4
3
31
11
4
7
9
12
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
8
9
3
3
4
3
3
•i
8
3
3
4
3
31
12
S
8
7
10
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
9
3
3
4
3
3
6
3
6
5
3
31
10
S
8
7
9
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
10
3
3
5
3
3
6
5
3
4
3
A
31
10
7
8
8
11
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
U
3
4
4
3
4
6
4
7
3
31
14
8
8
9
1ft
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
to
3
4
4
3
t>
6
8
5
3
31
16
9
7
9
14
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
8
3
4
4
3
5
4
12
3
3
31
14
10
8
10
13
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
4
7
3
4
3
5
4
14
4
3
30
14
11
9
11
12
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
4
5
3
6
3
5
4
30
12
P M
12
7
7
10
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
6
3
4
3
3
*]
10
1
3
9
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
5
3
3
4
3
31
9
2
3
a
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
3
3
4
3
31
a
3
4
3
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
3
31
5
4
6
7
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
5
4
4
5
4
3
5
3
31
7
5
17
16
6
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
6
3
4
5
4
5
4
3
3
3
5
31
17
6
12
14
12
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
8
3
5
4
4
5
5
4
3
3
3
5
31
14
7
12
10
11
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
16
3
5
4
4
6
6
3
3
3
3
31
16
1
11
9
13
6
3
3
.3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
12
3
5
4
3
6
8
4
3
3
3
31
13
9
12
12
13
5
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
3
5
5
3
7
5
4
3
3
3
31
15
10
11
12
11
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
11
3
5
5
3
5
7
4
3
3
3
31
13
11
9
9
8
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
8
3
5
5
3
5
7
3
3
3
3
31
13
DAILY
MEAN
8.2
9.2
10.1
6.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
«t,o
5.1
• "
9.0
*•'
3.0
3.9
*.3
3.9
3.9
5.5
4.3
4.5
3.8
3.0
NO
Of H*
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
23
5-MIN
MAX.
22
21
19
13
4
5
4
5
6
4
4
4
4
l£
14
21
4
6
6
6
9
11
13
23
13
4
4,6
742
-------
TABLE 3-105 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1963
DAY Of
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
3
4
6
6
3
3
3
3
4
4
5
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
26
6
1
3
3
6
6
3
3
2
3
3
4
6
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
26
6
2
3
4
6
5
3
4
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
26
6
3
3
4
6
5
3
3
2
3
3
4
4
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
26
6
4
3
4
5
5
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
26
5
5
3
4
5
5
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
26
5
6
3
4
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
5
3
3
3
26
5
7
3
4
5
5
4
4
3
3
3
5
5
3
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
4
3
3
26
5
8
3
5
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
6
7
4
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
5
5
3
4
4
26
7
9
3
4
5
5
4
3
3
3
3-
6
4
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
3
4
3
26
6
10
3
4
5
5
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
26
5
11
3
4
5
5
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
27
5
P M
12
3
4
5
5
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
24
5
1
3
4
5
5
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
23
5
2
3
5
5
5
4
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
23
5
3
3
5
5
5
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
26
6
4
3
5
5
5
4
5
3
3
3
3
4 '
4
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
27
5
5
4
5
6
5
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
5
4
2
2
5
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
26
6
6
5
5
5
3
5
4
3
3
4
4
5
e
4
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
25
8
7
5
5
5
3
5
4
3
3
3
4'
10-
6
3
2
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
27
10
8
6
6
5
3
4
5
3
3
4
5
13
11
4
2
3
10
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
13
9
8
6
5
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
10
11
5
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
11
10
8
6
5
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
8
9
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
27
9
11
8
5
5
3
4
4
3
3
4
4
5
8
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
27
8
DAILY
MEAN
4.8
5.3
5.1
3.1
3.8
4.2
3.6
3.0
2.8
3.2
3.8
5.1
5.0
3.4
2.2
2.4
3.9
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.6
3.2
3.8
3.2
3.1
NO.
OFHR
24
24
24
24
14
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
22
24
24
24
21
21
24
24
24
21
24
22
23
24
24
5-MIN
MAX.
9
10
8
8
4
6
8
6
4
3
6
8
16
15
6
3
4
16
6
4
4
4
3
5
6
5
4
3.6
622
§
-------
TABLE 3-106 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX. HDIY MEM)
A M
12
3
3
2
3
4
13
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
6
3
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
27
13
1
3
3
2
3
6
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
10
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
27
12
2
3
3
2
3
7
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
11
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
27
12
3
3
3
2
3
5
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
9
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
27
11
4
3
3
2
3
10
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
i,
3
4
10
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
27
11
5
3
3
2
3
13
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
27
n
(
3
4
2
3
11
10
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
9
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
7
4
27
11
7
3
5
2
3
13
9
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
9
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
6
4
27
13
1
3
8
2
3
9
11
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
11
3
2
2
2
2
. 3
3
3
6
4
?7
11
9
3
3
2
3
8
10
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
6
4
28
10
11
3
3
2
3
7
7
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
r 2
2
2
2
3
2
6
3
26
7
11
3
3
2
3
5
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
5
3
28
5
P M
12
3
3
2
4
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
4
3
26
4
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-107 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHU
nooro
MAX.HU
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
MEAN
AYS
VMEAN
12
2
2
4
11
3
3
3
2
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
3
3
6
3
4
31
11
1
2
2
4
7
3
3
2
2
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
3
3
6
3
4
31
8
2
2
3
10
3
4
3
2
7
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
7
3
3
6
3
4
31
10
2
2
3
12
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
4
3
4
31
12
2
2
4
7
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
31
7
A
2
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
6
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
3
4
3
3
3
31
6
M
3
2
3
8
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
31
8
3
3
2
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
31
5
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
31
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
31
6
N
3
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
30
4
11
3
2
2
3
4
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
29
4
B
3
2
2
4
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
28
4
1
3
3
2
4
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
28
4
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
31
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
30
5
4
3
2
2
4
4
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
30
4
r
s
3
2
3
4
4
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
•3
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
30
4
M
C
2
3
3
4
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
5
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
4
3
3
3
31
5
7
2
3
4
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
6
3
3
3
31
6
1
3
5
a
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
5
3
3
4
*>
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
4
7
3
3
4
31
8
*
2
6
12
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
V
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
5
9
3
3
4
31
12
M
2
7
11
5
3
2
3
9
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
4
12
3
3
4
31
12
11
2
4
11
4
4
3
2
6
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
7
3
3
4
6
3
4
4
31
11
DALY
MEAN
2.6
2.8
4.0
5.2
3.4
2.7
2.6
3.1
3.8
3.0
3.3
4.4
3.4
3.0
3.2
4.2
3.4
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.6
4.5
3.8
3.6
3.2
3.8
4.6
3.6
.5
3.0
3.5
NO.
OFHt
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
20
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
23
24
7L.
24
7»7
HNN
MAX.
5
9
14
18
6
4
4
12
10
4
8
11
7
4
4
10
6
5
6
3
3
8
9
9
6
6
7
17
8
4
-------
TABLE 3-108 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•URTM.T
NO. OF A
MAX'HM.
OF
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
mi
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
TUE
•EM
AYS
YMEAN
12
4
4
3
3
7
&
3
3
3
3
3
-------
TABLE 3-109 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, MAY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•O.Of 0
OF
WEEK
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
CDI
"*"MI
AYS
V MFUI
12
3
5
6
6
5
3
3
5
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
6
3
2
3
3
3
31
i
3
6
6
6
5
3
3
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
5
3
3
6
3
2
3
3
3
31
2
3
5
6
6
4
3
3
3
5
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
6
3
4
4
3
2
3
3
3
31
3
3
5
5
6
4
3
5
3
4
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
3
A
31
4
3
5
5
6
4
3
5
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
31
A
5
3
5
4
6
4
3
6
3
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
5
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
31
M
(
3
6
4
5
6
3
6
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
?
2
3
3
3
2
31
7
3
4
4
5
6
3
6
3
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
2
31
1
3
4
5
4
4
3
5
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
31
9
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
29
M
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
27
*
11
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
3
31
A
12
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
31
A
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
31
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
31
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
7
31
A
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
•j
31
r
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
31
A
M
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
31
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
2
2
2
3
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
31
A
3
4
4
5
3
3
4
4
4
3
2
2
3
5
3
5
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
A
3
2
3
3
3
3
31
c
5
5
4
3
3
5
4
3
3
2
2
3
5
4
9
3
5
3
5
3
3
3
A
3
3
3
3
3
3
31
it
3
7
6
5
3
3
5
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
4
8
3
4
3
5
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
31
11
5
7
6
5
3
3
5
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
7
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
31
DAILY
•EM
3.2
*.2
4.2
4.3
3.6
2.8
4.0
3.3
3.1
2.7
2.0
2.1
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.8
3.3
3.2
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.0
3.1
3 -a
3.0
CM co O> O- « r
• • • . •
CM CM CM CM CM f
33
.*
•0.
arm
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
•y A
24
24
23
24
24
24
3 A
738
ruu|
J~WHtl
•ML
5
8
7
7
8
3
8
6
6
3
3
3
5
7
10
10
5
6
4
6
7
4
5
8
3
4
5
5
5
-------
TABLE 3-110 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, JUNE 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
SAT
SUN
WON
WED
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
TMU
SAT
SUN
MON
1UE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
BUHIIHl MUM
NO. OfMYS
MM. HM.YMEAN
A M
12
7
7
<3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
6
3
2
2
5
4
4
11
7
6
5
3
3
26
11
1
7
7
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
7
4
3
2
5
1
3
10
7
6
5
3
3
28
10
2
5
5
it
3
3
3
3
3
4
8
4
3
2
6
4
4
10
6
14
5
3
3
28
14
3
5
7
4
3
3
3
2
3
4
^
7
3
3
1
6
4
4
10
6
13
4
3
3
28
13
4
6
6
5
3
3
4
3
3
4
6
3
2
1
5
4
4
12
9
6
4
3
3
28
12
5
6
B
4
^
3
3
4
3
3
5
4
6
3
3
1
5
4
4
12
9
6
4
3
3
28
12
(
7
7
6
5 5
4
3
3
4
3
3
5
4
5
3
2
1
5
4
5
13
8
7
4
3
3
28
13
4
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
2
3
2
4
2
3
13
9
6
4
3
3
28
13
1
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
2
3
4
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
9
5
4
3
3
28
11
»
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
2
4
4
1
3
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
3
3
27
5
It
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
1
1
0
3
4
4
3
2
24
4
11
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
0
5
3
3
3
2
3
28
5
P M
U
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
1
2
2
2
1
0
5
3
3
4
2
3
3
29
5
1
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
0
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
29
4
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
1
0
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
29
4
I
2
2
3
3
3
4
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
0
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
28
4
4
2
2
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
1
0
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
28
4
S
2
2
4
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
0
0
4
3
4
3
3
4
3
28
5
C
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
0
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
28
5
7
3'
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
4
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
29
5
1
3
3
3
3
3
4
6
4-
3
3
3
2
4
1
3
3
2
2
1
1
5
4
4
3
3
3
3
29
6
I
6
3
3
3
4
3
6
4
3
2
3
2
4
1
4
3
2
3
1
3
8
4
5
3
3
5
4
?9
8
Ml
6
4
3
3
3
3
5
5
4
3
3
3
5
1
5
4
2
4
1
4
9
6
5
3
3
3
4
2»
9
11
7
5
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
6
2
6
4
2
5
3
5
9
6
4
3
4
6
4
29
9
IM.Y
mm
4.2
3.8
3.6
.2
3.1
.6
4,0
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.7
2. A
3.9
3.9
3.9
2.8
2.7
2.2
1.9
2.4
1.8
4.5
.0
5.2
5.1
3.7
3.0
3.2
NO.
OF Hi
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
22
24
20
23
15
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
MM
MM.
8
9
6
5
5
7
7
8
5
5
5
4
6
5
7
10
7
4
4
6
6
5
11
13
11
25
7
6
8
3.5
679
-------
TABLE 3-111 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SIJN
MPN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
WED
T^U
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
6
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
4
5
it
2
3
3
4
3
2
2
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
27
6
1
5
3
2
3
4
3
2
3
2
4
5
4
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
27
5
2
5
3
3
4
4
6
3
2
3
2
5
5
4
?
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
?7
6
3
6
3
2
5
4
6
3
2
3
3
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
5
3
4
3
3
3
?7
6
4
7
3
3
5
4
6
2
2
1
2
5
5
4
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
4
4
3
3
3
1
27
7
5
3
3
5
5
2
2
2
3
5
6
4
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
3
3
3
3
3
27
6
6
3
3
5
6
2
2
3
4
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
27
6
7
3
3
4
5
2
2
3
3
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
6
3
3
3
3
3
27
6
8
3
3
3
2
3
3
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
5
9
2
2
2
5
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
5
10
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
23
4
11
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
25
3
P M
12
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3.
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
28
3
1
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2 2
3 3
2 »
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
27
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
27
4
4
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2R
4
5
3
2
2
?
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
4
3
27
4
6
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
27
4
7
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
26
4
8
2
2
3
i
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
26
4
9
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
4
5
3
3
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
26
5
10
4
2
3
3
3
4
3
2
5
5
4
3
3
6
4
3
3
2
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
26
6
11
5
3
3
3
2
4
3
2
5
6
6
2
3
5
4
3
3
3
2
3
5
3
4
3
4,
26
6
DAILY
MEAN
4.3
2.7
2.4
3.1
3 7
3.5
2.7
2.5
2.7
«.o
J.9
3.
-------
TABLE 3-112 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI. AUGUST 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
31
MONTHLY
NO. OfO
MAX. MB.
OF
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
FRI
SAT
MEAN
»YS
YMEAN
12
2
2
2
I
2
2
2
2
3
5
2
2
2
3
4
2
2
6
6
5
5
3
3
5
6
3
4
5
3
29
6
1
2
3
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
5
2
2
2
3
5
2
2
5
7
5
5
3
3
6
6
3
5
3
29
7
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
6
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
5
6
5
5
3
3
5
7
3
4
5
3
29
7
3
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
5
2
2
2
2
5
2
2
6
6
5
6
2
2
5
6
3
5
3
29
6
4
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
5
3
2
2
3
5
2
2
5
6
5
6
2
2
4
6
3
3
4
3
29
6
A
S
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
5
3
2
2
3
5
2
2
6
6
5
6
2
3
5
6
3
4
4
3
29
6
M
i
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
3
3
5
2
2
2
4
5
2
2
6
8
6
7
2
3
5
6
4
3
4
29
8
7
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
3
2
5
2
2
2
4
6
2
2
6
9
8
7
2
3
4
5
4
3
4
29
9
1
2
4
2
1
1
2
2
3
2
5
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
6
9
6
4
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
29
9
I
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
7
4
3
2
3
5
3
3
3
3
29
7
M
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
3
3
2
4
3
2
2
27
4
11
1
2
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
2
2
28
3
a
2
1
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
30
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
30
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
•»
3
2
2
30
3
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
30
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
30
3
r
*
i
i
i
i
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
30
3
M
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
30
3
7
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
30
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
5
4
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
30
5
»
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
4
3
5
3
3
4
3
30
5
U
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
5
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
6
5
5
5
3
3
6
5
3
5
3
30
6
11
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
5
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
3
3
6
6
3
5
3
30
6
ONLY
HUM
1.8
2.1
1.6
1.1
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.5
,6
2.5
3.2
2.2
2.0
2.0
2.5
3.1
2.1
2.0
3.1
4^8
4.3
4.1
2.7
3.3
4.0
3.4
2.8
NO.
OF HI
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
24.
24
24
24
24
14
24
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
705
CJMil
MAX.
3
5
4
2
3
3
3
5
7
9
7
4
4
3
5
7
3
3
6
7
10
8
8
4
6
7
9
6
-------
TABLE 3-113 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1963
DAY
•OWH
1
2
3
4
5
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
07
28
29
30
HO. Of B
MAX. MO
OF
WEEK
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
PR!
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
RRI
SAT
SUN
MON
»«
TMEAII
12
5
6
3
3
3
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
7
6
3
2
2
2
3
4
4
6
3
2
3
4
10
7
1
5
5
3
1
4
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
7
5
3
2
2
2
3
5
3
6
3
2
3
4
30
7
2
5
5
3
3
3
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
6
7
3
2
3
2
3
5
4
5
3
2
4
4
30
7
3
5
5
3
3
3
5
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
6
6
3
2
2
2
3
5
4
5
3
2
3
4
30
6
4
5
5
3
3
3
5
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
4
5
6
5
3
2
2
2
3
4
3
5
4
3
4
3
30
6
A
5
5
6
3
3
3
4
5
4
2
2
2
2
2
5
4
6
5
2
2
2
3
4
4
5
5
3
4
4
29
6
H
f
5
5
3
3
3
6
6
5
4
2
2
2
2
6
4
6
5
2
2
2
3
5
5
5
4
2
4
4
29
6
7
5
4
3
3
V
4
5
6
6
3
2
2
2
2
6
4
7
6
2
2
2
4
3
5
•7
3
2
5
4
29
7
1
4
4
3
3
3
3
5
8
4
3
2
2
2
2
5
3
5
4
2
2
2
4
2
6
7
3
2
5
3
29
8
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
4
3
2
2
3
2
6
7
2
1
4
3
29
7
11
2
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
1
25
4
11
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
27
4
12
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
I
3
2
28
3
1
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
2
27
3
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
2
27
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
2
28
3
4
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
1
3
2
30
3
P
5
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
3
30
3
H
i
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2
1
3
30
3
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
•»
4
2
2
3
3
3
4
2
1
5
30
5
1
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
3
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
5
6
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
5
2
2
6
30
6
»
5
3
3
3
3
5
5
3
6
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
7
6
3
2
2
2
3
3
4
5
2
3
6
30
7
M
6
3
3
3
3
5
5
4
6
2
2
2
2
2
3
4
7
6
3
3
2
2
3
3
4
6
2
3
6
30
7
11
6
3
3
3
3
6
6
4
5
2
2
2
2
2
4
5
7
5
3
2
2
3
4
4
4
2
2
6
29
7
ONLY
(KM
3.4
3.7,
2.9
2.9
2.9
3.5
4.°
3.2
4.4
3.0
2.2
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
3.5
*.3
5.1
3.8
2.7
2.1
2.1
2.6
3.1
2.8
3.4
2.6
1.7
3.9
•0.
OFM
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
18
21
24
20
24
23
23
24
24
24
19
24
24
22
ttOtt
MM
•ML
7
7
6
5
4
9
7
6
10
6
5
3
3
2
5
7
8
8
8
6
3
3
3
4
6
7
8
7
4
7
-------
TABLE 3-114 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, pptn C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
sgN
WON
TUE
WfD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HKIY MEAN
12
3
2
3
5
4
2
6
5
2
2
2
6
5
7
7
7
3
9
7
9
7
9
3
2
5.1
4.9
4.9
5.8
6.5
R 3
5.0
5K
7.1
6.3
5.7
6.1
5.6
4 2
2.9
2.6
4.1
4.0
NO.
OF HI
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
24
24
24
24
23
24
0 3
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
19
15
23
S-MIN
MAX.
4
4
10
g
8
7
6
9
10
7
3
8
10
1°
10
10
13
13
14
13
12
13
12
4
5
8
9
4.2
723
-------
TABLE 3-115 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1963
DAY
•ami
i
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•MTM.'
NO.OFD
MAX. Ml
OF
WEEK
FRI
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
rKM
AYS
YMEAN
12
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
4
3
6
3
3
3
3
9
4
3
2
2
3
26
9
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
6
3
3
3
3
7
4
3
2
2
3
26
7
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
4
4
3
4
2
2
3
26
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
2
2
3
26
5
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
5
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
2
2
3
26
5
A
S
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
6
4
3
4
3
3
3
2
2
3
26
6
•
(
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
a
4
5
3
5
3
4
3
2
2
26
a
7
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
5
3
3
4
10
5
5
6
3
5
3
5
3
3
2
26
10
1
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
5
3
3
4
9
5
4
6
3
4
3
4
3
2
2
26
9
»
3
3
A
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
6
5
4
5
3
4
3
3
2
2
25
6
11
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
5
5
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
3
26
5
11
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
27
5
12
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
28
4
1
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
27
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
27
5
3
3
4
3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
5
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
6
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
27
6
r
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
4
5
3
4
7
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
2
3
28
7
•
3
3
4
4
S
5
3
3
4
4
3
5
6
3
4
4
3
5
3
4
4
4
2
3
28
6
7
3
3
3
4
5
6
3
3
4
4
3
5
5
4
3
3
9
3
4
4
4
2
2
28
9
1
3 !
3
3
4
7
6
3
2
4
4
3
5
4
4
3
3
9
3
3
5
4
2
3
28
9
*
3 1
3
3
4
5
3
3
3
4
3
5
4
4
3
3
8
4
3
4
3
2
3
27
8
M
3 !
3
3
3
4
3
3
4
4
3
6
3
4
3
3
6
5
3
4
3
2
3
27
6
11
3
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
4
3
5
3
4
3
3
a
4
3
4
3
3
2
3
27
8
DALY
KM
3.1
3.2
3.3
3 A
3.3
3.6
4.1
3H
• *
2.7
2.8
3.3
3.7
3.7
3.1
3.8
5.5
3.8
4.0
3.1
4.6
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.4
2.2
2.5
3.4
•0.
OF*
24
j i.
13
24
24
24
21
14
•yi
1 -»*•»•
t (M CM IM
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
20
24
24
24
6*1
MMM
•AX.
4
5
5
5
a
7
5
5
5
7
6
5
7
11
6
8
6
10
10
6
6
8
4
4
-------
TABLE 3-116 HOURLY AVERAGES OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, ppm C atom (flame ionization analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
00
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO. OF A
lit* UM
OF
WEEK
SUN
M0N
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MEAN
»YS
Y MEAN
12
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
. 3
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
3
25
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
25
2
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
25
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
25
4
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
25
A
5
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
24
M
6
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
24
7
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
5
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
24
8
2
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
23
9
2
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
18
10
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
18
11
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
28
12
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
29
1
2
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
29
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
28
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
27
4
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
4
3
27
P
5
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
4
3
27
M
6
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
27
7
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
3
• 4
3
3
2
3
3
27
8
2
3
3
2
3
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
3
3
4
2
3
2
3
3
28
9
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
.4
2
3
3
28
10
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
3
3
28
11
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
2
3
3
27
DAILY
MEAN
2.4
2.8
2.9
2.6
2.9
3.7
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.9
3.1
2.4
2.7
3.0
3.2
2.9
3.0
3.3
2.8
2.9
2.8
3.°
3.5
2.9
NO.
OFHft
24
23
24
22
23
23
24
24
23
24
15
13
15
13
23
22
23
21
22
24
24
i 7
24
13
19
24
24
22
24
M A
5-MIN
MAX.
4
4
4
4
4
5
6
4
4
5
3
4
4
4
4
6
4
4
4
5
4
5
5
3
5
5
6.
4
-------
TABLE 3-117 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI, MARCH 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
9
7
6
7
6
7
10
5
7
9
10
1
8
8
6
7
5
6
9
5
7
9
9
2
8
8
6
7
5
6
8
•5
6
9
8
3
6
8
6
6
5
6
7
5
6
9
R
4
5
7
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
9
7
s
5
7
7
7
6
8
7
5
6
9
8
C
5
7
9
8
6
9
8
5
6
9
9
7
5
7
10
10
8
11
10
6
7
9
11
1
6
8
9
8
8
10
11
6
7
9
11
I
8
7
6
7
7
6
8
7
7
9
8
H
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
8
7
9
R
11
7
6
7
6
6
4
4
8
7
9
8
12
6
6
6
6
6
4
3
7
7
9
7
1
7
6
7
6
5
4
3
6
7
9
7
i
6
6
8
7
5
4
3
6
6
9
8
5
6
11
7
5
4
3
6
6
9
11
6
6
8
7
5
4
4
7
6
9
8
r
6
6
8
8
5
4
4
8
7
9
8
M
7
7
7
8
7
ft
5
8
7
9
8
7
9
8
8
9
8
10
6
9
8
9
10
1
11
8
9
9
9
14
5
11
7
9
14
1
8
8
8
7
9
14
7
9
7
9
14
11
9
8
7
6
8
15
6
10
7
9
15
11
8
/
7
6
8
10
• 6
7
7
9
10
DAILY
MEAN
6.9
7.1
7.4
7.1
6.4
7.4
6.1
6.8
6.7
NO.
OfHR
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
5-MIN
MAX.
18
13
14
15
14
29
14
18
10
216
-------
TABLE 3-118 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
DAY OF
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MF.AN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX. HOLY MEAN
A •
12
7
5
5
5
10
12
3
10
7
7
6
5
b
0
1
4
4
9
4
2
3
6
24
12
1
7
6
5
5
9
11
8
11
7
6
6
5
6
0
1
4
It
9
5
2
.3
6
24
11
2
7
ft
|j
5
1 1
10
8
10
7
6
6
6
6
0
0
4
5
7
4
2
3
6
24
11
3
8
5
5
5
13
10
11
8
7
6
5
5
5
0
1
3
5
8
4
2
3
6
24
13
4
8
5
5
5
12
10
10
8
6
6
6
6
6
0
0
3
5
7
4
2
3
6
24
12
S
10
6
6
6
6
10
9
11
8
6
7
7
6
6
0
1
4
6
7
4
2
2
6
24
11
t
16
7
7
6
8
9
9
14
8
6
8
8
9
8
7
6
1
3
4
9
9
4
3
3
7
24
16
7
21
8
8
7
R
10
9
15
9
7
9
10
7
9
8
6
2
3
6
11
10
4
4
8
24
21
1
12
7
6
7
6
10
8
13
8
7
9
9
6
8
7
6
2
3
5
8
6
3
5
7
24
13
»
9
5
4
6
6
8
7
9
9
7
7
8
6
7
6
5
2
1
3
4
3
3
3
5
24
9
11
5
3
4
6
6
7
6
9
8
7
8
6
7
5
6
1
2
3
3
3
2
4
5
23
9
11
4
3
3
6
4
5
6
8
7
6
8
6
7
6
6
2
2
3
3
3
2
5
22
8
P H
12
3
3
3
6
4
5
5
9
8
7
8
6
6
5
6
2
1
2
3
2
2
3
22
9
1
2
3
6
2
4
5
8
7
7
5
8
6
5
6
1
1
2
3
2
2
23
8
2
3
3
6
0
3
4
8
8
7.
6
8
6
5
6
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
24
8
3
4
2
3
5
0
3
5
8
7
6
8
6
6
6
1
3
3
2
3
1
1
24
8
4
4
3
3
5
0
4
5
9
7
7
6
9
6
8
6
2
3
4
3
4
2
1
25
9
5
5
3
4
5
0
5
5
9
8
6
7
1C
6
7
6
2
4
3
3
4
2
2
5
25
10
(
6
4
5
0
7
6
9
8
7
6
8
6
6
7
7
2
2
4
3
3
3
2
3
3
24
9
7
6
6
1
9
7
9
9
7
8
9
6
7
6
9
2
3
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
24
9
1
7
5
4
4
12
7
10
9
7
10
8
6
5
6
14
3
2
4
4
6
4
3
3
3
25
14
9
7
4
5
6
14
9
10
8
8
10
8
6
6
6
9
2
2
5
4
7
4
3
4
4
25
14
M
6
5
5
10
12
8
11
9
7
9
8'
5
5
7
13
2
2
4
4
5
4
2
2
3
2S
13
11
5
6
5
12
12
7
11
8
8
8
7
5
6
7
12
1
1
4
4
6
4
2
3
3
25
12
ONLY
KAN
7.5
4.7
4.6
5.8
4.2
8.6
7.4
9.8
8.3
6.8
7.5
7.9
6.2
6.2
6,0
7.1
1.7
1.4
2.5
3,4
4.8
4,6
2.7
3.3
3.2
NO.
OFM
22
24
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
20
24
24
24
24
24
13
24
21
24
24
24
24
22
24
S-MM
MM.
31
14
11
10
15
16
14
17
15
9
12
15
14
12
14
19
8
6
10
7
16
12
9
9
6
5.5
576
-------
TABLE 3-119 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI. MAY 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
HO.OFO
MAX H«l
OF
WEEK
WED
THU
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
2
8
5
6
2
2
7
5
7
13
6
13
13
1
2
6
4
3
J
1
6
ft
7
11
7
13
11
2
2
5
5
3
2
1
B
5
fi
8
6
13
8
3
2
5
5
3
2
1
6
5
6
7
5
13
7
4
2
5
5
3
1
1
6
5
6
6
5
13
6
A
S
3
6
7
3
2
2
6
5
7
6
5
13
7
M
C
3
9
9
4
3
2
7
7
7
y
6
5
13
9
7
4
6
11
4
3
2
8
6
8
6
5
13
11
1
4
4
5
10
3
1
1
6
5
6
6
5
14
10
J
3
2
4
4
2
0
1
3
5
5
5
5
14
6
to
2
1
2
1
0
1
3
4
4
4
5
14
5
11
1
1
1
1
0
1
3
2
4
4
4
4
15
4
D
2
1
1
1
0
0
3
2
4
4
4
4
15
4
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
3
3
4
4
4
4
15
4
2
1
2
3
0
0
4
3
4
5
4
4
15
5
2
1
2
1
0
1
4
3
4
4
4
4
15
4
2
2
3
1
0
0
5
4
5
5
5
3
15
5
P
3
2
3
1
0
1
5
3
6
5
6
4
15
6
•
2
2
2
1
0
1
4
3
5
4
5
5
4
15
5
3
3
3
0
2
1
5
4
6
5
6
5
15
7
5
5
5
2
4
1
7
5
6
5
10
a
5
15
10
8
8
6
5
3
2
1
8
5
6
6
7
5
15
8
11
8
8
6
5
2
2
1
8
4
6
6
6
5
15
11
11
10
7
6
2
1
1
8
4
7
6
7
5
15
11
OAIY
MEAN
3.3
4.0
4.3
4.4
2.2
1.3
0.9
5.1
4.6
5.1
5.6
.9
6.1
4.7
NO.
on*
24
24
24
24
24
24
13
24
24
24
24
24
341
MNN
MAX.
13
12
14
IO
14
8
11
5
12
9
10
9
17
20
9
-------
TABLE 3-120 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, own (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI. JUNE 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
'7
28
29
30
•UMINL1
NO.OFD
MAX. m
OF
WEEK
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
•EM
AYS
YMEAN
12
7
8
10
7
9
10
5
11
G
9
U
12
10
9
9
17
14
1
6
5
9
6
9
9
5
6
10
5
6
11
11
9
8
7
17
11
2
7
5
10
6
9
e
6
5
11
9
7
11
11
9
7
8
17
11
6
3
10
5
9
8
6
10
9
6
11
10
9
7
7
•17
11
5
3
9
5
9
7
5
9
8
6
12
10
9
6
7
17
12
A
5
3
8
6
9
8
6
6
9
7
7
12
11
10
7
7
17
12
•
4
4
8
9
13
12
6
10
7
11
14
14
11
9
9
17
14
4
3
6
9
15
12
7
6
9
5
9
16
17
1?
10
9
17
17
4
2
6
7
12
9
6
3
3
5
17
17
12
10
8
17
17
2
3
5
6
7
6
6
3
3
8
11
10
10
6
. 16
U
W
3
5
5
5
6
3
2
7
7
9
9
14
9
11
3
2
5
5
5
4
6
3
2
7
7
7
7
5
16
7
U
4
2
5
6
5
4
6
3
2
7
7
7
5
17
7
1
4
2
4
6
4
4
5
3
3
7
8
6
5
17
8
4
2
3
6
4
3
6
3
2
7
7
7
5
17
7
5
1
3
6
4
6
3
2
7
7
7
5
16
7
4
1
4
7
6
6
3
2
8
8
7
5
16
8
r
5
4
7
6
0
7
2
2
e
6
8
9
5
16
9
•
6
5
6
5
0
7
2
3
7
8
6
7
8
5
16
8
?
7
5
8
6
3
9
4
3
e
9
9
7
8
6
16
9
1
9
3
6
10
8
6
7
5
4
10
10
9
9
8
7
17
10
*
9
4
6
10
10
7
7
5
8
12
13
9
10
8
8
17
13
M
8
3
r
10
11
7
8
5
11
13
14
12
10
7
4
8
IT
14
11
8
2
7
10
11
7
7
14
9
10
13
13
12
8
7
^
9
17
14
•M.T
mm
5.*
3.0
6.2
7.1
7.9
6.3
6.3
54
5.7
5.0
7.9
10.3
9.8
8.8
7.7
A O
3 7
6.6
n.
OF Ml
23
21
24
23
24
22
24
74
23
24
22
24
24
24
24
74
24
MM
•ML
14
11
13
15
20
15
11
>A
13
15
19
20
30
14
12
q
-------
TABLE 3-121 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
HO.OFO
MAX. Hm
OF
WEEK
M0N
TUE
WED
THl)
FRI
SAT
SUN
MPN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WfD
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MpN
TUE
WED
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
9
9
12
13
13
11
10
12
8
14
15
13
13
14
12
10
12
11
19
15
1
9
9
11
14
13
10
10
10
8
8
13
13
13
12
12
11
10
11
11
19
14
2
9
9
11
13
U
11
10
10
8
6
13
13
13
12
13
11
10
10
11
19
14
3
9
10
10
11
13
10
10
10
8
13
13
13
12
12
11
10
11
10
19
13
4
9
10
11
10
12
9
10
10
13
13
13
12
12
11
10
11
10
19
13
A
5
9
11
11
10
12
10
10
11
9
14
13
13
13
12
10
10
12
11
19
14
M
t
10
13
13
15
12
10
11
14
15
15
14
14
13
11
12
15
12
19
15
7
10
12
14
15
12
11
11
12
10
9
17
15
15
14
13
11
12
15
12
19
17
a
10
11
14
12
U
10
11
10
9
16
13
13
12
12
8
11
13
11
19
16
9
0
8
9
10
11
11
10
10
16
13
11
12
11
8
10
11
10
19
16
10
8
9
9
9
11
10
9
13
12
10
11
11
10
10
10
17
13
11
8
7
8
8
9
11
10
7
7
10
12
11
11
11
9
10
9
18
12
12
8
8
8
8
9
11
10
9
6
10
12
12
11
11
10
11
9
9
20
12
1
8
8
9
6
9
10
10
11
6
11
12
12
12
10
10
11
10
9
20
12
2
9
8
8
9
9
11
9
11
5
11
12
13
12
10
10
11
10
9
20
13
3
9
9
9
8
10
12
9
11
5
13
12
13
11
10
9
11
10
9
20
13
4
9
9
9
9
10
12
9
11
8
14
13
13
12
10
9
12
10
10
20
14
P
5
9
9
9
9
10
12
10
11
8
18
13
13
12
10
10
12
11
10
20
18
M
6
9
8
9
a
10
13
10
11
7
7
14
12
12
12
10
11
11
10
10
20
14
7
9
9
10
9
12
11
11
11
id
14
13
13
14
12
11
12
12
11
20
14
8
10
10
11
11
13
12
11
13
10
15
14
14
14
13
11
12
11
19
15
9
10
11
12
12
13
12
12
14
12
9
16
15
14
14
12
11
12
12
19
16
10
10
10
14
13
13
11
14
15
12
16
14
13
14
14
11
12
12
19
16
11
9
9
13
14
15
11
11
13
11
17
14
14
13
13
11
13
12
19
17
DAILY
MEAN
8.3
9.0
10.1
10.5
U.*
11.8
10.4
11.2
9.4
»B
H.y
13.9
13.2
12.8
12,4
11.7
10.4
11.0
11.1
10.4
NO
OFHft
14
24
24
24
24
24
24
21
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
20
461
5-MIN
12
14
16
17
18
18
18
22
20
13
If
21
20
17
18
20
15
15
18
-------
TABLE 3-122 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI. AUGUST 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
.20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY
NO Of ft
MM. Ml
OF
WEEK
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MOM
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MDN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MEAN
AYS
YMEAN
12
11
11
13
13
12
15
14
9
15
1
11
11
12
13
11
14
13
9
14
2
11
12
12
13
11
13
13
a
13
3
10
11
12
12
11
13
13
9
13
4
10
11
12
12
10
12
12
8
12
A
S
11
11
12
12
10
12
11
8
12
M
6
11
11
13
13
10
13
11
8
13
7
12
11
15
14
9
15
12
8
15
1
12
11
12
15
9
17
11
9
17
I
12
9
9
11
8
16
10
8
16
N
11
9
9
9
8
11
9
7
11
II
9
9
9
8
8
8
8
8
9
12
9
9
9
7
a
7
9
8
9
1
9
9
9
8
8
7
10
9
10
2
9
9
12
7
8
7
9
8
12
J
9
9
10
8
7
7
9
8
10
« '
10
10
9
8
8
8
8
8
10
P
S
10
10
10
8
8
9
8
9
10
M
t
11
11
10
9
9
9
10
9
10
11
7
11
11
11
10
9
10
10
10
11
1
11
12
11
11
10
11
12
10
12
1
11
13
11
11
10
13
12
11
13
M
12
13
12
12
10
15
11
10
15
11
11
13
13
12
10
14
10
10
14
DAILY
MEM
10.5
10.6
11.2
10.6
9.2
81^
«•>
11.6
10.5
8.8
HO.
Of*
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
y i f\
S-MM
MAX.
12
13
15
16
12
1O
19
14
11
-------
TABLE 3-123 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI, SEPTEMBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
•MINL1
•0.0ft
NNLHM
OF
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FBI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
THE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
rKM
ms
.YMEM
12
10
10
2
10
1
10
10
t
1C
2
10
10
2
10
3
10
9
i
10
.
OF Mi
24
16
40
c_nm
7VNN
•ML
11
13
-------
TABLE 3-124 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI. OCTOBER 1963
DAY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MONTHLY
NO.OFQ
MM. Wl
OF
NEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
PRI
SAT
SUN
M£AN
AYS
YMEAN
12
22
15
12
15
15
16
9
14
11
2
3
13
22
1
20
15
11
13
14
15
8
13
9
1
3
13
20
2
19
14
10
14
12
13
10
12
8
I
3
3'
13
19
3
17
13
9
13
11
11
9
11
6
1
3
13
17
4
16
12
9
13
10
11
8
10
6
1
3
13
16
A
S
15
12
8
12
10
10
8
9
5
2
3
13
15
M
C
16
12
7
12
10
10
8
8
5
3
3
i
13
16
7
18
14
10
14
12
11
10
9
5
4
4
13
18
1
20
16
10
15
13
11
12
9
4
4
4
13
20
»
17
13
6
16
10
9
16
8
1
3
3
13
17
Ml
12
12
12
4
5
10
3
2
2
11
12
11
10
10
4
7
2
3
5
1
2
0
11
10
a
9
7
4
3
3
2
1
3
0
10
9
1
6
5
1
2
3
2
1
1
0
10
6
5
2
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
10
5
3
1
3
2
0
1
1
8
4
4
2
4
4
1
1
2
2
10
4
r
6
6
5
8
7
4
2
2
3
3
12
8
•
10
8
8
11
8
7
4
1
3
4
12
11
7
14
11
11
13
7
8
5
1
3
5
12
14
1
16
12
16
16
4
9
7
2
3
5
12
16
»
17
13
18
17
6
11
7
2
3
5
12
18
II
18
13
18
18
13
9
2
2
5
11
18
11
18
14
17
18
9
14
11
2
3
5
12
18
DAIY
mat
14.5
12.1
8.2
10.7
10.0
7.8
8.3
7.5
3.6
2.2
2.8
5n
57
NO.
OF Ml
22
14
23
24
24
23
22
20
20
24
24
1 Q
283
HUM
MAX.
23
16
15
19
18
17
17
15
12
4
6
-------
TABLE 3-125 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, ppm (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI, NOVEMBER 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
MOHTM1
W.OFD
MAX. HM
OF
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
rMFM
AYS
YMEAN
12
4
2
4
3
3
3
4
6
10
13
7
5
4
4
3
6
6
3
3
3
12
e
20
13
11
26
20
1
3
1
3
2
3
3
4
5
10
12
7
5
3
2
6
3
2
7
4
14
9
18
14
11
27
18
2
3
1
2
2
3
3
3
5
9
11
7
5
3
2
5
3
7
2
5
10
10
IB
15
11
26
18
3
3
2
2
2
3
4
5
9
10
6
4
2
5
1
2
6
2
4
10
9
9
16
14
11
26
16
4
3
1
1
2
2
3
4
4
8
9
6
5
2
5
1
2
5
4
9
9
9
15
10
13
27
15
A
5
3
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
8
8
6
4
2
5
1
2
5
2
5
9
9
9
15
10
9
27
15
H
(
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
7
8
6
5
2
5
2
5
5
C
9
9
15
11
9
25
15
7
2
2
2
2
3
5
5
8
8
6
6
3
5
6
4
7
3
5
9
10
10
14
10
10
26
14
1
2
2
3
3
4
5
6
8
7
6
4
5
7
6
4
7
7
9
10
10
16
10
10
26
16
»
3
2
3
4
3
5
5
5
9
7
6
6
2
5
4
8
6
4
7
5
8
11
8
11
14
10
10
29
14
It
2
2
3
4
5
4
3
8
7
4
5
6
2
4
3
3
5
5
5
7
11
8
13
16
11
26
16
11
2
2
2
4
5
2
2
6
7
2
4
2
2
4
5
5
3
5
9
10
9
12
16
9
12
26
16
12
1
2
2
5
4
2
2
4
5
2
4
2
1
6
5
9
11
8
12
18
10
12
26
18
1
0
2
2
5
4
2
3
4
2
4
4
2
2
8
4
8
11
8
10
16
10
13
26
16
1
1
3
1
1
4
3
2
3
5
3
4
7
4.
2
3
7
4
10
11
9
11
16
10
11
27
16
3
1
3
1
3
4
3
2
3
3
4
3
5
6
3
4
8
5
10
12
7
12
17
10
27
17
4
1
3
2
6
R
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
8
10
4
5
9
8
3
10
11
8
12
15
11
15
29
15
r
s
i
4
3
5
7
4
4
5
5
&
7
9
5
5
9
9
3
11
14
9
15
17
11
12
7
28
17
II
1
2
4
4
5
6
5
6
7
7
6
7
7
7
6
6
10
10
7
3
10
15
9
16
17
11
10
29
17
7
3
5
4
5
6
5
7
8
8
7
7
7
7
6
6
9
10
11
3
8
15
11
18
15
12
11
29
18
1
3
5
4
5
5
5
7
9
8
9
7
5
6
6
7
9
9
12
3
14
11
20
17
12
12
29
20
J
3
4
2
5
4
4
7
11
9
9
7
4
5
6
7
8
7
10
3
13
10
22
17
14
10
29
22
M
3
5
1
4
4
4
6
11
10
9
6
4
4
6
7
8
5
13
3
13
10
20
14
13
10
7
29
20
11
3
4
3
3
3
4
6
11
15
8
6
4
3
4
6
8
4
7
3
13
10
19
14
11
7
28
19
OAtY
MEM
2.2i
2.6
2.2
3.3
3.9
3.7
4.4
5.3
7.6
7.6
5.3
5.0
51
4.6
3.5
5.1
7.6
5.0
5.7
4.4
3y
• «
11.2
9.4
12.7
16.0
11.4
11.0
6 2
HO.
OFM
21
23
24
20
24
24
22
24
22
24
24
24
74
18
24
7»
22
17
23
17
23
24
21
24
24
24
22
23
653
HMD
MAX.
4
6
5
8
9
7
7
11
18
13
8
12
12
7
8
12
11
18
12
14
18
20
25
24
21
21
o
Tl
O
S
I
ot
Y
-------
TABLE 3-126 HOURLY AVERAGES OF CARBON MONOXIDE, pom (infrared analysis)
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MQN
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEAN
Mnc t\ivf
MAX. HRLY MEAN
A M
12
8
9
6
5
10
3
7
10
1
7
5
4
11
4
11
2
7
4
3
10
3
10
3
7
3
4
10
4
'
10
4
6
• 6
4
4
16
4
y
16
5
5
6
5
3
14
3
14
6
6
6
3
i
3
5
8
7
6
11
it
3
5
11
8
6
8
6
5
4
3
-7
8
9
8
7
4
4
8
10
6
8
6
8
4
8
11
3
6
6
11
10
3
11
P M
12
7
2
<=,
13
11
3
13
1
7
4
7
13
10
3
13
2
7
7
6
12
7
3
3
8
11
6
11
6
3
I
12
u
4
B
1 1
4
12
7
3
12
S
7
13
4
12
6
-------
TABLE 3-127 TWO-HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX, COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI, JANUARY 1963
OKI or
mam
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
MOUTHY MEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX
AM
12
2.7
1.6
1.1
0.5
1.6
2.5
1.7
2.7
1.9
1.9
1.5
2.2
l?z
1.6
14
2.7
.2
2.2
1.8
1.1
0.8
1.5
3.0
1.8
2.4
1.6
2.0
1.8
2.9
1.2
0.9
1*
3.0
4
2.1
1.7
0.8
0.8
1.6
3.6
1.3
2.1
1.6
1.9
1.5
3.2
1.6
1.4
14
3.6
6
2.3
1.9
0.6
1.5
1.7
1.1
0.9
1.7
1.5
1.7
2.2
3.4
2.2
1.1
14
3.4
8
2.0
2.3
1.1
1.8
0.9
1.3
1.0
1.6
1.6
1.1
4.3
3.6
1.9
2.4
14
4.3
10
2.2
2.2
1.4
0.3
0.6
1.1
0.8
1.6
1.5
0.7
4.1
4.7
2.4
2.9
14
4.7
12
1.9
1.5
1.7
0.7
1.1
1.0
1.4
1.8
1.9
1.5
3.1
3.1
1.9
2.0
14
3.1
PM
2
1.3
1.5
2.0
1.0
0.2
1.9
1.0
2.0
2.7
2.2
0.9
1.7
3.0
2.0
2.3
15
3.0
4
2.0
1.8
2.1
1.1
0.1
2.2
1.1
2.6
3.1
2.6
1.3
1.5
2.4
2.2
1.6
15
3.1
«
2.4,
2.1
1.5
0.2
1.2
1.8
1.4
1.9
2.6
2.3
1.4
1.3
2.4
2.0
1.6
15
2.6
8
3.6
3.4
1.8
0.9
1.6
1.6
1.2
2.0
2.3
1.7
1.3
1.8
2.5
1.9
1.2
15
3.6
10
3.2
3.3
1.2
0.3
1.8
1.5
1.1
2.0
1.5
2.2
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.9
1.2
15
3.3
ONLY
KAN
2.31
1.85
0.89
1.01
1.54
1.66
1.66
2.21
1.94
1.46
2.26
2.94
1.91
1.71
un
i?
i?
12
11
12
12
12
12
12
1?
12
1?
12
12
MAX.
3.6
3.4
2.3
1.4
1.8
2.2
3.6
2.6
3.1
2.6
2.0
4.3
«.7
2.4
2.9
173
4.7
-------
TABLE 3-128 TWO-HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX, COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI, FEBRUARY 1963
DAY
MOUTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
!8
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MONTHL
NO. OF 1
MAX.
Of
•EH
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED i
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
YMEAN
)AYS
12
1.3
2.5
1.0
3.2
2.0
4.4
1.4
0.8
•1.2
2.5
1.4
1.7
1.1
1.0
3.3
2.1
2.1
0.3
o.t
2.1
0.5
1.0
1.4
2.3
1.76
2<,
4.4
2
0.9
1.4
0.4
1.7
2.4
4.6
1.7
0.6
1.2
2.7
1.8
1.3
0.8
1.6
3.2
2.3
2.5
0.7
0.9
1.7
0.6
1.1
1.7
2.1
1.70
24
4.6
A
4
1.2
1.2
0.7
2.5
3.6
4.4
1.7
0.6
1.5
2.0
1.9
2.1
2.9
1.4
2.4
3.4
2.0
3.2
0.8
1.1
2.2
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.8
2.02
25
4.4
M
6
2.1
1.2
0.5
2.4
5.0
4.5
2.1
1.4
1.7
2.0
2.4
2.3
2.4
2.0
1.8
3.6
2.4
3.9
1.3
2.3
2.4
0.7
2.5
1.7
2.9
3.9
2.42
26
5.0
8
2.3
2.4
0.9
2.9
4.5
5.4
2.6
1.2
2.6
2.2
1.5
1.8
2.4
1.4
1.8
2.5
1.8
2.4
l.l
2.5
2.3
2.3
1.7
2.6
5.0
2.44
25
5.4
10
2.0
2.7
1.5
2.5
4.2
4.5
2.3
1.5
2.7
3.2
2.3
1.9
2.5
1.3
1.5
2.6
1.8
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.8
1.0
1.8
4.1
2.20
26
4.5
12
2.6
1.3
1.0
1.7
2.6
2.3
2.6
1.2
1.9
2.8
2.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.8
1.2
1.0
1.9
1.1
0.9
1.6
0.4
1.6
2.2
1.72
26
2.8
2
1.8
0.9
1.1
1.8
1.8
2.2
2.0
1.2
2.5
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.3
0.9
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.6
1.3
1.9
2.0
1.65
26
2.5
P
4
2.2
1.7
1.5
1.7
2.0
2.1
2.2
1.6
2.1
3.1
1.7
1.8
2.2
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.8
0.6
0.8
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.9
2.3
1.84
25
3.1
M
6
2.5
1.0
1.9
2.8
4.2
3.6
1.5
1.6
2.7
2.8
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.0
2.0
2.3
2.5
1.0
1.2
2.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.5
1.9
1.9
1.98
26
4.2
8
2.5
1.3
1.9
2.5
4.3
3.8
1.8
1.3
2.2
2.2
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.3
2.2
2.2
1.5
0.7
1.0
2.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
2.2
1.6
1.93
26
4.3
10
2.4
0.9
1.4
1.9
5.1
3.8
1.7
1.5
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.5
0.6
2.5
2.4
1.6
0.5
0.8
1.5
1.2
1.0
1.5
2.3
1.3
1.84
24
5.1
DAILY
MEAN
2.02
1.57
1.18
2.34
3.52
3.84
2.00
1.26
2.08
2.56
2.02
1.83
1.97
1.32
1.83
2.60
2.07
0.97
0.99
1.65
1.70
1.00
1.65
1.30
2.06
2.65
1.96
NO
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
11
10
12
12
12
12
12
12
07
12
12
11
. 10
09
12
12
12
303
MAX
2.6
2.7
1.9
3.2
5.1
5.4
2.6
1.6
2.7
3.2
2.6
2.3
2.9
2.0
2.5
3.6
2.8
3.9
1.5
1.4
2.5
2.4
1.4
2.5
1.7
2.9
5.0
5.4
-------
TABLE 3-129 TWO-HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX, COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI. MARCH 1963
MY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX.
A M
12
1.*
1.4
3.1
1.*
0.4
0.5
0.3
3.5
0.7
2.1
1.7
1.6
1.6
3.1
1.1
1.4
2.5
0.5
1.3
1.8
3.0
2.4
2.7
0.5
0.5
1.0
3.1
0.9
1.2
1.65
29
3.5
2
1.5
1.2
2.9
1.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
2.6
0.9
4.2
1.1
1.6
0.8
2.9
0.8
1.1
2.6
1.6
0.6
1.6
3.1
2.*
2.0
0.4
0.6
1.1
2.9
0.7
1.2
1.61
29
4.2
4
1.5
1.4
2.5
1.4
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.7
0.6
2.5
1.0
1.3
0.9
2.6
0.8
1.2
2.4
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.4
0.7
1.8
1.0
1.1
2.1
3.0
1.6
1.4
1.46
29
3.0
6
1.9
1.7
2.6
3.7
2.2
1.2
1.6
2.0
1.3
1.0
2.1
1.0
1.3
1.0
2.8
0.8
1.6
3.6
1.2
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.6
2.0
3.3
3.8
1.8
1.2
1.82
30
3.8
8
2.4
2.0
3.3
2.4
1.8
0.8
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.8
1.0
1.9
0.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
0.9
0.7
1.1
0.6
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.6
2.3
1.6
1.0
1.53
30
3.3
10
2.2
1.9
2.8
2.0
2.5
1.5
1.4
1.7
2.3
0.7
4.2
0.6
1.8
1.3
1.4
1.9
0.4
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.7
1.2
0.9
1.4
0.9
i.5
1.2
1.0
1.3
0.9
1.55
31
4.2
P M
12
2.3
-1.8
1.6
1.4
1.9
1.0
1.4
1.2
2.1
0.5
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.3
0.9
3.1
0.5
1.3
0.8
1.3
1.2
1.8
1.7
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.45
31
3.1
2
2.3
1.3
0.8
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.2
1.1
1.8
0.9
2.3
2.0
1.4
1.0
1.9
2.3
0.7
1.2
1.3
0.8
1.1
3.5
1.7
0.7
1.2
1.5
0.8
1.2
1.2
0.8
1.45
30
3.5
4
2.3
1.3
1.0
2.1
1.7
0.7
1.0
1.1
1.6
1.0
2.1
0.8
1.3
1.7
2.6
1.3
0.6
0.6
0.8
1.1
3.6
1.7
0.7
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.5
0.9
1.40
29
3.6
6
1.7
2.4
2.4
2.2
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.1
2.2
0.6
0.9
1.8
2.6
1.1
0.4
0.3
0.5
1.0
5.2
1.6
0.7
0.8
2.2
2.6
0.9
1.9
1.3
1.64
29
5.2
8
1.8
3.1
3.9
2.4
1.0
1.6
1.8
2.2
1.3
1.2
1.7
0.7
0.8
1.9
2.1
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.9
4.8
1.9
0.8
1.6
1.1
2.0
3.6
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.71
30
4.8
10
1.5
3.6
2.5
0.8
1.2
1.2
3.7
1.3
1.5
2.1
0.7
1.4
2.7
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.4
0.8
3.7
1.6
0.9
0.5
0.9
1.7
3.9
0.9
1.9
1.65
27
3.9
DAILY
MEAN
1.95
1.96
2.49
2.33
1.62
1.04
1.22
1.52
1.94
0.92
2.36
1.78
1.26
1.45
1.66
2.11
0.71
1.33
1.47
0.94
1.03
2.60
1.81
1.11
1.56
1.06
1.51
2.07
1.88
1.50
1.11
NO.
12
12
11
09
12
12
12
12
12
11
07
12
12
12
12
12
12
08
12
12
12
12
12
12
09
12
12
12
12
12
11
MAX.
2.4
3.6
3.9
3.7
2.5
1.6
1.8
3.7
3.5
1.2
4.2
4.2
1.8
1.9
2.7
3.1
1.1
1.6
3.6
1.6
1.3
5.2
3.1
2.4
2.7
1.6
2.2
3.9
3.8
2.0
1.4
1.59
354
5.2
-------
TABLE 3-130 TWO-HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX. COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI, APRIL 1963
MT OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
ma.
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU'
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. Of DAYS
MAX.
A M
12
1.6
1.2
0.7
3.3
4.0
3.2
1.7
1.6
1.8
2.2
3.9
1.4
0.9
3.4
1.5
0.9
0.7
0.3
3.1
2.01
19
4.0
2
1.9
1.5
0.8
3.6
5.0
2.7
2.6
1.6
2.1
2.1
4.9
1.6
1.4
3.0
1.7
1.0
0.8
0.5
2.0
2.18
19
5.0
4
4.2
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.8
3.3
1.5
2.6
1.6
1.2
1.7
3.4
1.2
1.0
2.7
1.2
1.1
0.7
0.5
1.7
1.80
20
4.2
6
2.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.7
2.4
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.0
1.9
0.7
0.6
3.0
?.7
1.5
1.6
0.9
0.3
0.9
1.3«
21
3.0
8
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.2
0.9
1.2
0.7
1.3
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
0.8
0.6
3.6
1.8
1.4
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.6
1.18
21
3.6
10
0.2
0.5
0.8
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.6
2.3
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.6
2.2
1.5
1.4
0.9
1.3
0.5
1.08
21
2.3
P M
12
1.2
0.8
0.6
1.0
1.2
1.1
0.8
2.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.3
0.5
0.6
0.7
2.0
1.5
o:s
o.a
0.6
0.3
1.07
21
2.8
2
1.1
0.9
0.6
1.0
1.4
2.5
1.2
4.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
0.7
1.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
1.26
21
4.0
4
1.3
1.0
0.3
1.7
2.8
4.1
1.6
2.6
1.7
2.6
2.3
2.2
2.0
1.0
2.2
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.3
0.6
1.67
20
4.1
6
1.2
0.9
0.3
1.6
3.5
3.8
0.9
0.9
1.4
2.8
1.1
2.8
1.0
1.0
2.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.8
1.53
20
3.8
8
1.0
0.8
0.2
0.8
3.5
3.7
0.2
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.0
3.2
1.2
3.0
1.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
2.1
1.0
1.46
20
3.7
10
1.2
1.2
1.9
4.7
3.3
0.8
1.6
1.1
1.4
2.4
2.3
0.9
3.2
1.7
0.3
0.8
0.6
2.3
1.81
18
4.7
DAILY
MEAN
1.56
1.13
0.83
1.19
2.41
3.01
1.28
2.06
1.29
1.56
1.53
2.50
1.12
0.90
1.90
2.36
1.17
1.03
0.82
0.94
1.16
NO
nu.
10
12
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
08
09
12
12
12
12
12
11
II AY
mfUU
4.2
1.9
1.5
1.9
4.7
5.0
3.2
4.0
1.7
2.8
2.4
4.9
2.0
1.4
3.6
3.4
1.7
1.6
0.9
2.3
3.1
1.51
241
. 5.0
-------
TABLE 3-131 TWO-HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX, COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI, JULY 1963
MY OF
itam
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WEEK
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
MONTHLY MEAN
NO. OF DAYS
MAX.
* M
12
1.0
0.7
1.1
0.7
1.5
0.*
0.9
0.8
8
1.5
2
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.2
8
0.9
4
0.7
0.5
1.*
0.7
0.6
0.9
1.1
0.6
8
1.4
6
0.2
0.4
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.5
0.7
0.6
8
1.6
8
0.7
0.6
0.7
1.3
0.5
0.6
0.6
1.1
8
1.3
10
1.1
1.0
0.6
0.3
0.7
0.4
0.6
0.2
8
1.1
P M
12
0.4
0.7
1.1
0.6
0.3
0.8
0.2
0.0
0.4
9
1.1
2
0.0
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
9
0.8
4
0.5
0.6
. 0.8
1.4
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
9
1.4
6
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.4
8
0.6
8
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.4
0.6
0.3
0.3
8
1.4
10
1.1
1.0
1.4
0.6
1.4
0.8
0.9
0.2
8
1.4
DAILY
MEAN
0.73
0.71
0.92
0.76
0,95
0.72
0.64
0.54
NO.
12
9
7
12
12
12
12
12
MAX.
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.1
99
1.6
-------
TABLE 3-132 TWO HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX. COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI, OCTOBER 1963
MT
NORTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHL
NO. OF C
MAX.
OF
MEEK
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
rMEAN
AYS
12
2.0
2.1
0.8
2.2
2.3
2.1
1.5
1.6
2.0
1.1
0.7
0.6
1.4
1.6
U
2.3
2
2.2
2.4
0.3
1.9
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.9
1.6
0.8
0.5
1.0
1.0
2.2
14
2.4
It
4
2.0
2.0
0.5
1.5
2.8
2.0
1.9
1.4
2.0
1.2
0.5
0.6
1.5
1.5
14
2.8
II
6
2.9
2.6
1.7
1 2.8"
2.8
2.4
2.3
2.5
2.3
1.5
0.8
1.4
1.9
1.8
14
2.9
8
2.6
2.0
1.1
1.4
2.5
2.5
2.2
3.4
1.7
1.1
0.9
1.3
3.0
1.8
14
3.4
1O
1.7
2.2
1.9
1.0
1.4
1.8
1.4
0.9
1.9
1.2
0.2
0.6
0.8
1.6
1.2
15
2.2
12
0.7
0.3
0.4
0.4
1.0
1.1
1.3
0.7
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.9
0.8
1.3
15
1.3
2
0.3
0.2
0.4
1.0
0.3
0.8
0.6
0,6
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.6
0.4
1.2
15
1.2
P
4
0.6
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.8 1
0.7
1.2
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.9
15
1.2
H
6
1.&
2.0
0.8
1.6
0.5
1.5
1.7
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.7
1.2
1.3
0.9
15 •
2.0
8
1.9
2.5
1.7
2.1
1.9
2.2
2.3
1.3
0.9
0.6
0.4
0,3
1.9
1.7
1.5
15
2.5
10
2.2
2.0
1.0
1.9
1.8
2.2
2.7
1.9
2.1
0.9
0.5
0S9
1.4
2.4
1.1
15
2.7
DAILY
MEAN
1.36
1.84
1.51
1.13
1.50
1.92
1.87
1.39
1.54
1.22
0.71
0,73
1.08
1.50
1.45
NO
07
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
175
MAX
2.2
2.9
2.6
2.1
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.3
3.4
2.3
1.5
0.9
1.9
3.0
2.2
3.4
-------
TABLE 3-133 TWO-HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX, COHS per 1000 tin. feet
CINCINNATI. NOVEMBER 1963
DAY OF
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
.17
18 .
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WEEK
FRI
SAT
SUN
WON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE'
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
MONTHLY MEM
NO. OF DAYS
MAX.
A M
12
0.5
0.7
1.4
1.2
1.5
1.5
1.1
1.3
3.0
3.3
1.5
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.6
0.7
0.9
2.3
1.0
0.7
1.5
0.1
0.4
4.2
0.8
3.5
0.6
0.9
1.40
28
4.2
2
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.5
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.3
2.5
3.0
1.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
1.3
1.1
0.8
1.9
1.5
0.6
1.7
0.2
1.1
1.9
1.1
3.0
0.3
0.7
1.30
28
3.0
4
0.6
0.5
2.3
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.6
1.8
2.9
3.3
1.2
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7
1.9
1.5
1.3
1.4
0.4
1.2
1.2
1.0
3.6
0.6
0.5
1.37
28
3.6
6
1.2
0.8
2.6
1.8
1.4
1.6
1.4
1.7
4.6
3.1
2.2
1.5
2.0
1.1
2.0
1.5
1.2
5.2
3.3
2.1
3.1
0.2
1.8
0.9
2.4
2.4
1.0
0.9
2.00
28
5.2
8
1.0
1.0
2.5
2.8
2.2
1.5
1.8
2.0
5.1
3.8
2.7
1.5
1.6
1.8
2.9
2.0
0.9
4.9
3.6
2.1
2.8
0.6
1.3
1.3
2.6
2.1
1.1
1.7
2.25
28
5.1
10
1.0
0.7
1.1
1.9
1.6
1.3
1.1
1.0
3.1
2.5
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.8
1.8
1.4
0.7
3.3
2.8
1.6
2.5
1.3
1.7
1.0
1.7
2.0
2.4
1.2
1.0
1.65
29
3.3
P M
12
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.5
2.2
2.1
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.4
0.7
1.2
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.4
0.8
1.3
2.5
1.7
0.9
1.3
1.1
1.4
0.9
1.2
1.7
1.4
0.7
1.6
1.31
30
2.5
2
0.3
0.3
0.8
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.4
0.7
1.0
0.6
1.0
1.3
1.6
1.0
0.8
0.5
1.3
3.8
1.5
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.4
0.8
0.5
l.l
0.9
0.8
1.4
1.08
30
3.8
4
0.6
0.9
0.8
1.9
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.7
0.6
1.1
1.7
1.3
1.8
1.9
0.6
1.5
3.6
1.6
1.1
0.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.6
0.9
0.7
1.0
1.29
30
3.6
6
0.9
1.6
1.4
1.6
1.3
1.4
1.8
2.1
1.4
2.3
1.4
1.1
1.1
2.0
2.2
2.0
0.8
2.6
2.7
1.6
1.3
0.9
1.0
3.3
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.4
0.1
0.9
1.60
30
3.3
8
0.7
1.5
1.3
1.1
l.l
1.0
1.8
2.5
2.3
2.2
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.7
1.7
1.0
0.3
2.3
1.9
1.1
1.4
0.6
1.2
3.8
2.2
1.5
2.1
1.5
0.6
0.7
1.51
30
3.8
10
1.3
1.2
1.7
1.2
1.1
1.0
2.1
2.0
3.4
1.5
0.6
1.3
0.8
i.3
1.3
1.3
0.3
2.0
l.l
1.7
2.0
0.3
0.7
3.4
2.6
1.0
2.6
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.49
30
3.4
ONLY
MEAN
0.85
0.93
1.56
1.66
1.45
1.32
1.46
1.55
2.66
2.38
1.28
1.12
1.22
1.38
1.70
1.36
0.75
2.96
1.94
1.38
1.51
0.76
1.95
1.71
1.33
1.76
2.03
0.75
1.06
NO
nu.
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
07
12
12
12
12
UiV
N1AA.
1.3
1.6
2.6
2.8
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.5
5.1
3.8
2.7
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.9
2.0
1.2
2.6
5.2
3.6
2.1
3.1
1.3
3.8
4.2
1.7
2.6
3.6
1.2
1.7
1.52
349
5.2
-------
TABLE 3-134 TWO HOUR AVERAGED SOILING INDEX, COHS per 1000 lin. feet
CINCINNATI, DECEMBER 1963
MY
MONTH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHll
NO. OFD
MAX.
OF
WEEK
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
fMtAN
KYS
12
0.8
1.9
1.0
1.*
0.9
1.2
1.7
1.6
0.5
0.5
0.9
1.3
1.0
0.7
1.8
1.3
2.7
1.2
1.1
1.2
2.0
. 1.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.7
0.4
0.9
2.8
1,3
1.4
1.38
31
2.8
2
0.4
1.1
1.0
1.5
0.8
1.2
2.3
0.8
0.8
0.6
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.1
2.4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.7
1.2
0.6
0.8
1.1
0.9
1.7
1.13
31
2.4
*
4
0.6
1.3
1.1
1.8
0.6
1.6
1.3
1.0
0,5
0.5
0.6
1.1
0.5
0.6
1.1
1.2
3.6
1.3
1.9
1.0
1.6
1.0
1.7
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.5
0.6
1.6
1.1
2.1
1.23
31
3.6
•
6
1.4
2.2
1.1
2.2
1.5
2.2
2.1
0.8
1.5
2.1
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
2.1
6.0
1.4
2.5
2.5
2.4
1.8
2.5
2.2
1.7
1.7
1.1
0.8
2.2
2.4
2.1
1.93
31
6.0
8
1.9
2.5
1.7
2.7
1.1
2.7
2.4
0.9
1.5
1.7
1.1
2.1
1.5
1.5
1.6
2.4
4.5
1.6
2.7
3.3
2.6
1.9
2.5
2.8
2.0
2.5
1.0
1.8
2.4
3.4
2.7
2.20
31
4.5
10
1.5
1.7
2.1
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.0
1.4
2.0
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.9
2.5
2.4
3.4
1.7
2.0
2.9
3.3
1.5
2.3
2.0
1.9
2.1
1.5
1.1
2.0
4.2
1.9
2.06
31
4.2
12
1.5
1.1
2.2
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.8
1.5
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.6
2.6
1.9
1.4
1.6
1.9
3.0
1.4
2.3
2.0
2.4
2.1
1.5
1.2
1.2
3.8
1.7
1.82
31
3.8
2
0.9
2.5
1.7
1.8
1.3
1.7
1.2
1.1
1.6
1.7
1.4
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.6
2.0
2.6
1.5
0.9
2.3
2.3
1.1
2.5
1.5
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.5
1.9
1.3
1.71
31
2.6
P
4
1.6
2.3
1.7
1.2
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.7
1.4
2.3
2.1
1.2
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.9
1.9
2.0
1.5
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.2
2.1
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.69
31
2.3
M
6
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.3
2.5
1.8
1.7
0.6
1.3
1.4
1.7
2.4
1.6
1.5
1.6
2.1
1.1
1.6
2.3
3.5
1.7
2.4
1.8
1.7
2.1
0.8
2.6
1.2
1.9
1.6
1.78
31
3.5
8
1.5
1.0
1.4
1.1
1.3
2.2
1.6
1.6
0.3
1.1
1.1
1.7
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.5
2.4
1.3
1.4
2.3
3.5
1.3
2.0
1.2
1.7
1.6
0.6
2.7
1.1
''•'
1.8
1.61
31
3.5
10
1.7
1.2
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.3
0.9
0.6
1.7
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.2
3.2
1.6
1.6
1.1
1.7
0.6
0.8
3.0
0.9
1.4
1.7
1.56
31
3.2
DAILY
MEAN
1.33
1.73
1.53
1.73
1.32
.87
.75
.22
.03
.43
1.27
1.65
1.48
1.30
1.57
1.85
2.92
1.44
1.72
2.12
2.61
1.55
2.08
1.71
1.74
1.72
0.99
1.63
1.66
2.18
1.83
1.68
NO.
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
372
MAX.
1.9
2.5
2.2
2.7
1.9
2.7
2.4
1.7
1.6
2.1
1.6
2.3
2.4
1.9
2.5
2.6
6.0
1.7
2.7
3.3
3.5
1.9
2.5
2.8
2.4
2.5
1.5
3.0
2.8
4.2
2.7
6.0
-------
TABLE 3-135
TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER,
CINCINNATI, 1963
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY MEAN
JAN.
130
199
126
102
112
155
114
119
78
111
181
208
213
228
105*
105*
126
109*
109*
81
103*
103*
138
112*
112*
131
FEB.
99
93
202
389
255
141
125
128
141
251
193
122
101*
101*
126
117
240
166
MARCH
254*
254*
107
68
93
121
94
87
77
55
71
102*
102*
81
80
141
238
146
90*
119
APRH.
90*
151
158
138
113
183
158*
158*
169
109
170
148
76
128
166
156
176
180
177
109*
109*
107
74
80
180
70
136
MAY
78
170
187
187
139
81
160
206
229
191
180
61
110
125
148
97
116
124
129
71
182
136
122
82
162
75*
75*
85
111
114
91
130
JUNE
157
124
112
125
145
140
155
89
111
167
90
136
106
111
116
109
180
205
153
106
162
95
127
210
204
222
175
160
81
140
JULY
120
127
122
84
179
123
109
188
177
64
95
136
166
112
106
86
157
92
73
90
127
76
68
120
107
116
AUGUST
131
171
121
120
85
91
94
98
160
142
115
136
96
71
101
188
112
103
210
214
271
190
103*
103*
143
164
127
125
126
135
SEPT.
110
118
118
142
99
156
301
224
209
257
141
172
147
67
71
140
187
287
309
204
59
69
86
142
241
305
136
92
164
OCT.
209
149
156
137
240
183
147
181
237
290
164
184
96
171
260
230
257
244
282
156
172
267
262
244
242
248
158
125
97
136
138
196
NOV.
144
97
102
94
96
114
111
214
189
129
148
136
83
136
127
82
89
178
164
102
114
70
62
111
103
113
171
75
81
118
DEC.
65
71
94
104
88
90
104
74
49
79
89
65
100
102
84
97
166
98
92
93
109
131
90
104
168
83
102
112
111
135
98
-------
TABLE 3-136 BENZENE-SOLUBLE ORGANIC MATTER, H-gm/m3
CINCINNATI, 1963
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23
30
31
MONTHLY MEAN
JAN.
16.5
25.2
10.6
11.1
10.1
12.8
14.6
12.8
8.2
10.7
19.5
26.6
18.2
20.0
6.9*
6.9*
7.8
7.8*
7.8*
6.0
10.2*
10.2*
11.3
8.5*
8.5*
12.4
FEB.
4.8
6.3
17.5
43.1
10.1
6.8
6.8
6.4
5.9
23.3
10.7
5.4
6.7*
6.7*
4.6
7.9
19.7
11.3
MARCH
24.0*
24.0*
8.8
4.7
6.7
6.7
3.6
5.9
5.6
2.6
3.1
8.8*
8.8*
6.2
5.2
12.4
21.1
9.8
1.6*
8.9
APRIL
1.6*
9.8
8.9
6.4
3.5
2.9
9.8*
9.8*
3.8
8.2
13.1
11.1
4.0
8.3
6.8
9.0
6.6
6.7
5.9
7.1*
7.1*
5.0
6.3
3.9
15.8
5.7
7.2
MAY
6.0
15.9
16.6
18.4
7.2
12.9
12.0
12.8
10.7
9.2
8.4
4.4
8.2
8.1
20.6
6.8
10.0
8.1
7.0
3.1
9.8
6.3
6.7
5.4
10.1
3.4*
3.4*
4.7
4.7
6.9
6.6
8.9
JUNE
15.7
9.7
7.2
5.5
7.0
8.4
12.1
4.7
4.8
5.5
5.3
9.7
6.1
7.3
11.6
8.4
15.3
15.3
9.0
7.3
18.7
9.3
11.3
11.5
14.4
9.7
7.5
9.3
4.9
9.4
JULY
6.5
7.1
7.1
4.1
2.5
13.7
2.2
7.6
6.1
4.5
7.1
7.7
4.6
4.8
4.3
8.1
10.0
5.6
4.1
4.2
5.6
5.6
4.1
6.8
8.0
6.1
AUGUST
5.9
9.3
6.1
5.2
6.9
4.8
5.1
11.5
14.7
12.1
11.3
10.2
6.6
8.2
11.4
14.7
8.5
6.8
26.7
25.5
21.6
19.0
9.0*
9.0*
14.2
11.9
7.5
10.3
13.6
11.3
SEPT.
13.8
13.1
7.9
5.8
10.4
16.5
29.3
12.3
14.0
23.2
7.6
6.7
7.4
4.8
3.4
14.8
20.2
28.7
24.7
13.2
5.4
3.6
5.1
10.6
15.6
19.5
6.4
10.5
12.7
OCT.
15.8
8.2
4.7
7.0
26.5
17.0
10.5
7.8
20.1
30.5
10.6
9.2
5.3
20.0
26.5
19.2
23.4
21.1
26.4
13.5
18.9
23.8
21.7
22.9
17.3
18.8
12.2
6.4
9.1
9.4
7.6
15.9
NOV.
9.9
7.5
7.0
6.1
8.1
10.6
9.3
19.4
14.5
12.4
8.8
7.6
6.4
13.1
9.9
9.8
6.1
20.5
14.5
10.5
9.6
5.8
7.4
18.6
8.4
10.1
15.0
7.7
7.1
10.4
DEC
6.3
2.2
4.5
4.0
4.7
4.7
6.1
4.5
3.8
4.9
4.7
2.7
4.7
5.8
7.1
7.9
11.8
7.4
3.4
5.8
10.5
11.6
6.7
7.5
15.8
7.0
6.4
11.7
9.4
13.8
6.9
-------
TABLE 3-137 GROSS BETA RADIOACTIVITY, picocurii»s/m3
CINCINNATI, 1963
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
MONTHLY MEAN
JAN.
6.9*
6.9*
13.5 -
10.1*
10.1*
11.8
11.8*
11.8*
10.4
FEB'.
4.5
7.9
7.2
10.0
7.4
MARCH
9.9*
9.9*
2.5
3.1
5.5
3.5
5.2
4.6
7.8
5.8
6.8
12.0*
12.0*
7.7
2.2
10. 9
15. 5
15.4
11.3*
8.0
APRIL
11.3*
14.4
20.8
18.9
7.6
4.8
10.0*
10.0*
14.5
1.3
2.6
4.9
9.6
14.3
14.8
17.2
18.0
16.8
16.8
17.3*
17.3*
7.5
3.0
8.9
10.7
11.7
11.7
MAY
11.2
13.7
9.2
16.2
19.7
8.8
12.3
8.5
9.1
13.7
6.2
10.8
26.7
7.2
4.5
2.3
6.9
3.4
12.3
11.7
9.1
7.4
10.5
12.0
11.9
10.4*
10.4*
7.6
6.5
5.6
14.4
10.3
JUNE
13.0
10.7
9.5
11.0
9.1
10.8
12.4
10.1
9.3
12.5
3.4
14.6
9.1
8.0
8.9
9.8
14.3
13.6
15.4
7.8
10.3
12.9
16.4
15.1
9.9
14.2
12.8
11.7
7.8
11.2
JULY
8.2
10.8
6.6
2.8
7.5
15.0
11.9
8.0
7.8
6.4
6.3
7.5
7.6
5.9
3.8
9.4
8.4
10.0
8.7
7.6
4.7
5.2
3.7
6.0
9.0
7.6
AUGUST
9.8
8.2
9.1
7.0
9.0
10.4
10.8
10.4
11.2
5.9
9.0
9.6
5.4
5.1
2.8
1.4
5.9
3.8
1.2
2.4
4.3
4.5
3.3*
3.3*
4.9
4.6
2.5
2.2
4.5
5.9
SEPT.
3.1
4.7
4.6
2.7
1.5
4.3
5.9
5.2
4.4
3.6
3.1
4.1
3.0
4.6
1.3
1.0
4.3
5.1
5.2
3.4
1.9
0.1
2.4
3.5
4.b
5.3
4.9
1.0
3.5
OCT.
2.1
3.1
3.6
1.4
1.7
3.2
4.0
3.7
1.5
2.4
2.7
3.6
2.4
2.0
3.5
2.3
2.6
3.1
2.2
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.4
2.2
1.1
1.2
1.4
2.1
2.0
0.8
0.7
2.3
NOV.
1.7
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.1
0.8
1.3
2.0
1.5
1.6
1.1
0.9
0.2
0.4
0.5
1.1
1.6
1.5
1.8
2.0
2.1
1.9
0.7
1.4
1.4
2.0
1.7
1.4
0.8
1.4
DEC.
0.6
1.0
1.3
1.5
0.9
0.6
1.3
1.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
1.0
1.1
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.1
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.5
2.0
1.1
0.9
1.9
1.1
1.0
0.9
-------
APPENDICES
A: INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
B:REFERENCES
-------
APPENDIX A: INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
INSTRUMENTATION
The gaseous pollutant instrumentation was
originally developed and fabricated by a private
firm under contract with the Public Health Service;*
the calibration techniques were developed-by the
CAMP staff. When subsequent field operations have
disclosed difficulties, instrument modifications have
been made by CAMP personnel; all the instruments
have been modified, and some of the changes have
been major. In addition, the calibration techniques,
particularly for the "wet" instruments, have been
continuously studied and frequently revised.
The gas-measuring instruments, as modified,
are thus unique. The other instruments at the
CAMP stations (high-volume and spot-tape parti-
culate samplers) are, in contrast, intentionally
identical with many others used throughout the
country.
Sulfur Dioxide
The SO 2 instrument is based on a conducto-
metric method of analysis. The sample air stream
is drawn through a dilute sulfuric acid solution
containing hydrogen peroxide. Sulfur dioxide in the
sample stream is oxidized to further ionize the
solution. Any change in the conductivity of the
solution, compared to a reference cell, is propor-
tional to the SO 2 concentration, and may be
measured in either of two ranges, corresponding
to 0-2 and 0-10 ppm of S02.
This instrument is very stable and presents few
calibration difficulties. The electronics are checked
daily by switching to a built-in circuit that simulates
1.5 ppm S02. At least weekly, the air flow is
manually eliminated to simulate a zero condition.
The upscale range is statically calibrated at least
monthly with standard solutions, and very little
drift has been apparent. Dynamic calibration is
performed at least once a year with standard gas
mixtures diluted at the site.
The response time of the instrument is about
8 to 12 minutes; this lag causes some smoothing
of concentration peaks of about 10-minute duration,
which are believed to occur in some locations.
Since the instrument response is largely a function
of the reagent movements, improvements are being
sought in the liquid flow controls and design details.
The conductometric analysis is considered very
accurate; although it reacts to any ionizable sub-
stance, it is essentially specific for SO 2 because
no other such substance occurs significantly in the
normal urban atmosphere. Other instruments, more
specific for SO2, are being investigated.
Oxides of Nitrogen
The NO2 instrument is based on a colorimetric
technique, incorporating Saltzman reagent t to
quantitatively form a magenta color. The color
is measured by a ratio photometer (operating
at 545 millimicrons), which has a 90 percent
response equivalent to 1 ppm of NO2 • Such color-
imetric analysis is considered accurate within
10 percent.
The effluent air from the NO 2 instrument is
bubbled through an acidified potassium
permanganate solution to convert NO in the stream
to N02. The stream then passes into an identical
instrument, which measures the original NO con-
centration as NO2.
These instrument systems are subject to con-
siderable zero drift; hence they are purged (with
carbon-filtered air) daily at a time when pollutant
levels are usually low, the zero correction being
recorded daily and the instrument reset when the
drift becomes excessive. The scale range is cali-
brated with colored optical filters at least biweekly
and also after each cleaning or adjustment of the
photometer. In addition, both instruments are
dynamically calibrated periodically with standard
gas mixtures prepared at the CAMP station.
The response time of the NOx instruments is
about 15 to 20 minutes, part of which is inherent
in the reaction that produces the color changes in
the reagent; the remainder is due tp engineering
features of the instruments necessary to insure the
desired precision. Although this response time is
the longest of any of the CAMP instruments, it is
not considered a major problem because NOX levels
are believed to fluctuate less rapidly than those
of other pollutants.
Total Oxidant
The total oxidant instrument reacts the sample
air stream with a neutral 10 percent potassium
iodide solution, releasing free iodine in the presence
of oxidizing agents. A ratio colorimeter (operating
at 345 millimicrons) measures the color of the
liberated iodine against a reference, operating in
the range 0-0.5 ppm of oxidants. The instrument
"Contract No. SAph 76457, Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, California
t A reagent containing sulfanillc acid, N-(l-naphthyl)-ethylenediamene dihydrochloride, and acetic acid; see Reterence 12.
APPENDIX A: INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
185
-------
records the presence of any substance capable of
oxidizing iodide in the KI solution, such as ozone,
the peroxyacetyl nitrates, to a lesser extent the
nitrogen oxides, and others.
Sulfur dioxide produces a negative interference,
driving the oxidation reaction back toward the
neutral potassium iodide. This interference is
troublesome, and dictates extreme caution hi inter-
preting oxidant data from any location in which
SO2 occurs simultaneously in appreciable amounts.
The large proportion of time for which zero oxidant
concentration is reported represents those times
when the concentration was truly zero plus those
times when SO 2 completely suppressed the oxidant
measurement. Thus the only positive statement that
can be made is that the appearance of a measured
oxidant concentration indicates the actual presence
of that level or higher in the atmosphere.
If the interference can be reasonably quantitated,
of course, simple calculations can provide more
meaningful oxidant information; this has been done
with success in some CAMP cities. An absorber
device to eliminate the SO? interference has been
employed since January 1964, but none were
operational during 1962 and 1963.
Apart from the SO 2 interferences, the oxidant
instrument system presents sensitivity and stability
problems, and satisfactory data are acquired only
with extensive and careful maintenance. Frequent
calibration similar to that described for the oxides
of nitrogen systems is required.
Total Hydrocarbon
The total hydrocarbon instrument incorporates
a flame ionization detector, in which the sample air
stream is introduced into a hydrogen-air flame,
where the hydrocarbons are dissociated in the
intense heat The positive carbon ions produced
by the dissociation are collected by an electrode
above the flame, and the current produced is pro-
portional to the number of carbon atoms ionized.
The operating range of the instrument can be as
sensitive as 0-10 ppm carbon atoms, although
CAMP operates the instrument on a scale of
0-40 ppm.
The flame ionization technique is well established
and is considered very precise, and the instrument
operates with little difficulty. Because the response
of the instrument is normally almost instantaneous,
CAMP has incorporated an integrating flask into
the system to reduce instrument "noise" and pro-
vide about 6-minute averaged data. The hydro-
carbon system is dynamically calibrated twice
weekly with purified air-methane mixtures hi the
near-zero and 20-ppm ranges. Since these mixtures
are stable, they are prepared and standardized
at the Sanitary Engineering Center hi Cincinnati
and shipped to the CAMP stations. This method
of supplying calibration gases, developed by
CAMP personnel, offers distinct advantages hi
precision and logistics over the on-site preparation
techniques necessary for the "wet" instruments.
Carbon Monoxide
The CO instrument is a short-path monobeam
infrared analyzer, based on the molecular absorp-
tion of infrared radiation by carbon monoxide;
it is an interesting variant of the more conventional
long-path infrared analyzers. The single infrared
energy beam is directed hi series, as indicated hi
Figure A-l, through a sample cell containing the
flowing sample air stream, and through sample and
reference compartments of a dual detector unit,
charged with CO-argon mixtures.
DETECTOR UNITS
sample reference
]_
SAMPLE CEL
|f
sample
air stream
-i,
J
y
v_
1.
CO/A
\
IHiah
CO/A
diaphragm-
pressure
Figure A-1. Schematic Diagram of CAMP Carbon Monoxide
Instrument.
The sample detector compartment is charged
with a low concentration of CO, which absorbs a
quantity of radiant energy dependent upon the
amount previously absorbed by the sample air
stream. The reference detector compartment con-
tains a high concentration of CO, which absorbs
enough radiation to be largely unaffected by the
slight fluctuations hi incident energy produced by
varying absorption hi the sample cell and sample
detector unit. It thus provides a veiy stable refer-
ence, with which absorption hi the sample detector
is differentially compared. In each compartment,
the energy absorbed is measured by pressure
transducers.
The instrument can give very rapid response,
but integration time of about 5 minutes has been
introduced hi the same manner as with the hydro-
carbon system. The instrument is extremely sensitive
along the entire range (0-100 ppm), and is dynami-
cally calibrated twice weekly hi the manner
described for the hydrocarbon instrument.
Both water vapor and carbon dioxide absorb
infrared radiation at wavelengths very near the
absorption wavelength of CO. The degree of such
interference is measured periodically by filtering
the sample stream through columns of silica gel
and ascarite. When interferences are significant,
the CO data are declared invalid and are not
reported. Because of such interference, valid CO
data were often sparse, and on occasion non-
existent, during most of the first year of CAMP
operation. Since December 1962 this problem has
been largely eliminated by addition of an infrared
filter, which narrows the radiation band of the
source lamp to converge on the CO absorption
wavelength.
186
APPENDIX A: INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
-------
Particulates
METHODS OF DATA ANALYSIS
The high-volume air samplers in use at the
CAMP stations are of the type used by the National
Air Sampling Network and by most state and
local agencies. Particulate samples are collected
on 8- by 10-inch glass fiber filters considered 100
percent efficient for particles about 0.3 micron in
diameter and larger; vertical influent airflow
velocity limits the sample to particulates smaller
than about 100 microns in diameter.
The filters are analyzed in the same manner
as routine NASN samples. They are equilibrated
at 75°F and 50 percent relative humidity over-
night prior to determination of total particulate
weight. Gross beta radioactivity is measured with
a proportional-gas-flow counting chamber when
the filter is 2 days old and again several days
later. The apparent half-life so determined is used
to calculate the reported values representing activity
on the day sample was collected; these values are
also corrected for counter efficiency, filter absorp-
tion, and self-absorption. Organic particulates are
determined by extracting an aliquot of the filter in
redistilled benzene for 6 to 8 hours to remove
more than 95 percent of the benzene-soluble
organics; the organic extract is filtered and dried
to remove the solvent before the residue is weighed.
More detailed descriptions of analytical procedures
and sampling methods are available in the 5-year
summary of NASN operations..13
Soiling index measurements are obtained at
the CAMP stations with a standard automatic
paper-tape sampler. Air is drawn at 0.25 cfm
through a 1-inch circular "spot" on Whatman
No. 4 filter paper tape for a 2-hour period, the
sampler advancing the tape automatically. The
tapes are periodically removed and the percentage
of light transmission through the soiled spots is
compared to that of the clean tape.
DATA RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
Each of the instrument systems for gaseous
pollutants produces an electric output signal which
drives a strip chart recorder. At 5-minute intervals,
the signal is momentarily diverted to an analog-to-
digital recorder, which records the magnitude of the
signal on punched paper tape. Thus the basic data
represent the instantaneous value recorded by the
instrument at 5-minute intervals.
The data are translated from punched paper
tape to punched cards for the creation of a magnetic
tape for an electronic computer. Throughout the
several steps of this process, extensive hand check-
ing is done.
The .information presented in this volume is
derived from the data through the application of
several analytical techniques. Some of these are
common statistical methods, while others have been
developed primarily for use with the CAMP data.
The tremendous quantities of data have necessitated
the programing of even the simpler techniques for
the digital computer facility of the Robert A. Taft
Sanitary Engineering Center. This section describes
some of the analytical techniques employed and
their application to the CAMP data, both as back-
ground to the results reported in Part 2 and as an
illustration of the type of additional material avail-
able on request.
Frequency Distribution
Frequency distribution analyses summarize the
frequency of occurrence of the various pollutant
concentrations recorded. The pollutant concentra-
tions tabulated in the frequency distribution tables
represent the concentration that was not exceeded
by the specified percentage of the total data con-
sidered. Although such a distribution is properly
termed a relative cumulative frequency distribution,
the phrase "frequency distribution", or merely
"distribution", is used in the text for convenience.
Frequency distributions of this type provide a
convenient means for determining the median
pollutant concentration and data for specific fre-
quencies, such as the concentration exceeded 2 per-
cent of the time, the concentration below which the
pollutant level fell 10 percent of the time, etc.
The graphical presentations of frequency dis-
tributions are drawn to logarithmic-probability
scales; if the logarithms of the pollutant concen-
trations were distributed according to a normal
probability distribution, the resulting curve would
be linear, and the data would be described as
being lognormally distributed. The slope of a curve
plotted to such scales is a function of the variance
of the population of data included, with a steeper
slope representing more variable pollutant levels.
The vertical placement of the curve is determined by
the magnitude of the pollutant concentrations. Thus
a curve that has an inflection represents data re-
corded from two relatively distinct populations with
differing variances or levels.
Most of the frequency distributions presented in
Part 2 were extracted from more extensive tabula-
tions of the type presented in Table A-l. For any
specified period, the computer program first sorts
the 5-minute data and calculates a frequency dis-
tribution by standard statistical methods; it then
generates a new input with 10-minute means, and
returns to sort these data. This process is repeated
APPENDIX A: INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
187
-------
to provide frequency distributions of data averaged
over 5, 10, and 30 minutes, and 1, 4, 12, and
24 hours.*
The frequency distributions of the data averaged
for longer times are primarily designed to provide
information for a detailed investigation of averag-
ing times used in sampling for various pollutants.
This work and similar specialized reports will be
published separately, and will include detailed ex-
planations of the methods of analysis.
Dosage
The dosage analysis referred to in Part 2 is
essentially a search for times when the pollutant
concentration equalled or exceeded a prescribed
level. When such an event is found, the analysis
program calculates the dosage, or area (in ppm-
hours) under the concentration curve by a trape-
zoidal approximation. It tabulates the events and
tallies them into a two-way frequency distribution
by dosage and duration.
The use of the dosage concept as a technique
for summarizing pollutant exposure is in the
developmental stages, and the analysis is used
here only to locate the highest pollutant levels.
When the study of exposure indices is complete,
a detailed report will be published.
TABLE A-l
TABULATION FROM FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS PROGRAM
CONTINUOUS AIR MONITORING PROGRAM
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF CONCENTRATION OF GASEOUS ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS FOR SELECTED AVERAGING TIMES
ClNClNNATIt OHIO
SULFUR DIOXIDE (PPM)
AUG 01, 1963 - AUG 31, 1963
AVERAGING
TIME
5 MlN.
10 MlN.
30 MlN.
1 HR.
4 HR.
12 HR.
24 HR.
* DATA
USED
89.2
S9.3
89.4
89.5
89.8
88.7
90.3
MIN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
F K E
10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Q U E
30
0.00
0.00
o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N C Y
50
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
D I 5
70
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
o.oi
0.01
T R I B
90
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
U T 1
92
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0 N - P
94
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
E R C
96
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
E N T
98
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.04
MAX
0.99
0.99
0.62
0.42
0.15
0.05
0.04
ARITH.
MEAN
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
"The frequency distributions for carbon monoxide and total hydrocarbons over weekend and weekday pe riods are
calculated by a different computer program, which produces only distributions of the 5-minute data.
188
APPENDIX A: INSTRUMENTATION AND METHODS
-------
APPENDIX B: REFERENCES
1. HEARINGS before a SPECIAL SUBCOM-
MITTEE ON AIR AND WATER POLLU-
TION of the COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC
WORKS, United States Senate, 88th Congress,
First Session, September 9, 10, and 11, 1963,
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963.
2. Lewis, Rudolph P., et al. AIR POLLUTION
IN GEORGIA, Georgia Department of Public
Health and U.S. Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service,
1962.
3. Hochheiser, Seymour, Horstman, SanfordW.,
and Tate, Guy M., Jr. A PILOT STUDY OF
AIR POLLUTION IN BIRMINGHAM,
ALABAMA, Robert A. Taft Sanitary
Engineering Center Technical Report A62-22,
Cincinnati, Ohio, 1962.
4. Sheehy, James P., et al. A PILOT STUDY
OF AIR POLLUTION IN JACKSONVILLE,
FLORIDA. Public Health Service Publication
No. 999-AP-3, 1963.
5. Bureau of the Census. CITY-COUNTY DATA
BOOK 1962, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, D.C.
6. PRELIMINARY REPORT: MASTER PLAN
FOR HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIOprepared
for the Regional Planning Commission,
Hamilton County, Ohio by Harland
Bartholomew and Associates, St. Louis, 1961.
7. DIRECTORY OF MANUFACTURERS 1961.
Chamber of Commerce, Cincinnati, Ohio,
1961.
8. MOTOR VEHICLES, AIR POLLUTION,
AND HEALTH. U.S. Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service,
House Document No. 489, 87th Congress,
2nd Session, U. S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C., 1962.
9. Miller, Marvin E., andNiemeyer, Lawrence E.
"Air Pollution Potential Forecasts - A Year's
Experience," U.S. Weather Bureau Research
Station, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering
Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1962.
10. Niemeyer, Lawrence E. "Summer Sun-
Cincinnati Smog: A Recent Incident," Journal
of the Air Pollution Control Association 13:8,
p. 381, August, 1963.
11. Lynn, D. A., Steigerwald, B. J., and Ludwig,
J. H. THENOVEMBER - DECEMBER 1962
AIR POLLUTION EPISODE IN THE
EASTERN UNITED STATES, Public Health
Service Publication No. 999-AP-7, 1964.
12. Saltzman, B. E. "Colorimetric Determination
of Nitrogen Dioxide in the Atmosphere," Anal.
Chem. 26, 1949-55 (December 1954).
13. AIR POLLUTION MEASUREMENTS OF
THE NATIONAL AIR SAMPLING NET-
WORK, 1957-1961, Public Health Service
Publication No. 987, U. S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
GPO B2I-653—14
189
------- |