SOURCE TEST REPORT
EPA TEST NO.: 71-CI-22
PLANT TESTED: Speedring, Inc.
Cullman, Alabama
TESTOR: Environmental Engineering, Inc.
2324 Southwest 34 Street
Gainesville, Florida 32601
AC 904/372-3318
CONTRACT NO: 'CPA 70-82, Modification No. 1 to
Task Order No. 2, Second of Three Plants
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
INTRODUCTION !
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS . 2
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 5
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS 9
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES n
%
Procedure for Sampling and Analyzing Beryllium
from Stationary Sources
APPENDIX
Code to Sample Designations • 13
Complete Beryllium Test Results 14
Sampling Procedures Used for
Beryllium Sampling 20
Sampling and Analytical Procedures
Prescribed by EPA 25 •
Results of Laboratory Analyses for Beryllium 31
Project Participants 32
Field Data" 33
-------
INTRODUCTION
/
Beryllium emission tests were performed on three sources located
at Speedring, Incorporated, in Cullman, Alabama, on August 10, 11, and
12, 1971.
Speedring is a beryllium metal and beryllium oxide ceramics
machining plant, and utilizes bag collectors for controlling beryllium
dust emissions. All three sources were tested at locations following
the control units. Two separate sampling trains were used to test each
source simultaneously. Two separate test runs were performed on the
North and South stacks, while only one test run was performed on the
middle stack.
- 1 -
-------
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
Summarized test results of stack parameters and beryllium
emission rates for all three plants tested are included in Tables 1
through 3. Complete stack parameter and beryllium emission test
results are included in the appendix. The tests indicate that the
Speedring Manufacturing Company emits 0.14 grams of beryllium per
8-hour day.
The following code was used to characterize sample data:
SI - Speedring, Inc., Division of Schiller Industries,
Cullman, Alabama
N - North Stack
M - Middle Stack
S - South Stack
1 - Run #1
2 - Run #2
3 - Run #3
G - Gelman type A filter
MP - Millipore AA filter
GB - Gelman type A filter (when used as a backup)
Be - Beryllium sample
IGB - Impinger and back half acetone and water and rinses, and
backup filter combined.
I - Impinger and back half acetone and water rinses combined
P - Probe particulate and probe acetone wash combined
F - Filter
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF BERYLLIUM EMISSION DATA
SPEEDRING MANUFACTURING COMPANY
CULLMAN, ALABAMA
NORTH STACK
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate @ Stack
Conditions, CFM
Stack Gas Moisture, %
Volume
Stack Gas Temperature, °F .
Test Time, Minutes
Beryllium Emissions, Total Catch
yg/m @ Stack Conditions
grams/8-hr. day
N-l-MP
8/10/71
2850
0.96
116
120
3.20
0,12
N-2-MP
8/10/71
3037
0.4
114
120
0.41
0.02
N-l-G
8/10/71
2923 '
0.7
119.5
120 ,
2.77
0.11
N-2-G
8/10/71
3049
0.3
114
120
0.86
0.04
- 3 -
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF BERYLLIUM EMISSION DATA
SPEEDRING MANUFACTURING COMPANY
CULLMAN, ALABAMA .
MIDDLE STACK
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate 0 Stack
Conditions, CFM
Stack Gas Moisture, %
Volume
Stack Gas Temperature, . F
Test Time, Minutes
Beryllium Emissions, Total Catch
yg/m @ Stack Conditions
grams/8-hr. day
M-l-MP
8/11/71
876
0.9
120
120
0.42
0.01
M-l-G
8/11/71
892
1.1
120
120
0.41
0.01
- 4 -
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF BERYLLIUM EMISSION DATA
SPEEDRING MANUFACTURING COMPANY
C.ULLMAN, ALABAMA
SOUTH STACK
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate @ Stack
Conditions, CFM
Stack Gas Moisture, %
Vol ume
Stack Gas Temperature, F
Test Time, Minutes
Beryllium Emissions, Total Catch
yg/m @ Stack Conditions
grams/8-hr. day
S-l-MP
8/11/71
1980
0.8
• 123
120
4.18
0.11
S-2-MP
8/12/71
1752
1.6
115
120
2.10
0.05
S-l-G
8/11/71
1949
2.0
123
120
2.58
0.07
S-2-G
8/12/71
1794
1.3
115
120
0.61
0.01
- 5 -
-------
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
The Speedring Corporation is a machining facility engaged in
the production of high tolerance parts from specialty metals such as
beryllium and beryllium oxide. The machining operations performed in-
clude cutting, turning, grinding, drilling, ultra-sonic machining, and
other similar processes. A major portion of Speedring's operations are
performed wet, including ultra-sonic machining and most roughing operations
Each operating machine is serviced by one or more high velocity
hose pick-ups located at the tool point. Mhen a machine is not in ser-
vice, the vacuum hose to that specific machine is capped.
A table of pertinent information for the control equipment
preceeding the three emission points tested is included in Table 4. The
control equipment is listed under the exhaust system it services. A bag-
house controlled emissions from each of the stacks tested. The following
table lists the weights collected as determined by weighing the baghouse
catch.
3 *TotaT Weight (Ibs.) of Be Collected
Avg. Cone, (yg/m ) of By the Baghouse Preceeding
Be in Stack Gas The Stack Sampled
North 1.94 12.0
Middle 0.48 0
South 2.6 0
The zero weights recorded for the Middle and South baghouses can be
attributed to the type of operations they service. The majority of these
operations are performed wet while the operations serviced by the North
-------
baghouse are performed dry. The wet beryllium collected by the Middle
and South baghouses apparently is caked on the bag material and not easily
separated. The conclusions in this instance are that wet machining oper-
ations did not reduce stack emissions to a level lower than dry machin-
ing, and that weight collected from baghouses is not representative of
emissions.
-7-
-------
TABLE 4
BAGHOUSE OPERATIONS AT SPEEDRING, INC.
I
CO
I
Weight Checks
Day of
Exhaust Emission
Turbine Exhaust Flow Rate Temperature Number Bag Dimensions Test
Equipment H.P. Duct ACFM °F Bags Dia. (in.) x Length (in.) Ibs. Be
Baghouse 30 South 1875 120 40
Baghouse 30 Middle 920 163 40
Baghouse 40 North 2960 115 62
3.75 x 54 0
3.75 x 54 0
3.75 x 54 12.0
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Stack extensions were connected to the existing effluent stacks
from the baghouses so that the sampling locations would be approximately
eight stack diameters downstream from any disturbance.
Circular metal stack extensions were used on all sources tested
at Speedring Manufacturing Company, Inc. In all cases, the sampling
location was eight stack diameters downstream and two stack diameters
upstream from any disturbance. Figures 1 and 2 are typical diagrams
of the stack extensions used. The stack diagram shown in Figure 2
represents only the South Stack at Speedring. Figure 3 shows the select-
ed sampling points for all sampling.
- 9 -
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
T
D
I
o
20
80
FIGURE NO. 1
1
o
3D ' 80
J
A
Port #1
Port tf 2
FIGURE NO. 2
SAMPLE POINT DISTANCE FROM INSIDE STACK WALL
Point No. 12" I.D.
1
2
4
5
6
1 3/4"
3 1/2"
8 1/2"
10 1/4"
11 1/2"
FIGURE NO. 3
-10-
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
All sources were tested in such a manner as to comply
with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Proposed Reg-
ulations on National Emission Standards for Five Stationary Source'
Categories, published in the Federal Register (36 F.R. 5931,
March 31, 1971). A copy of these procedures from the August 20,
1971 Environment Reporter is presented in the appendix.
Specific testing procedures and modifications of the
prescribed EPA method are also included in the appendix.
All samples collected were sent to EPA personnel in
North Carolina for Beryllium analysis. Laboratory results are
presented in the appendix following.
-II-
-------
APPENDIX
-------
CODE TO'SAMPLE-DESIGNATIONS
SI - Speedring, Inc., Division of Schiller Industries,
Cullman, Alabama
N - North Stack
M - Middle Stack
S - South Stack
1 - Run .#1
2 - Run #2
3 - Run #3
G - Gelman Type A filter
MP - Millipore AA filter
GB - Gelman type AA filter (when used as a backup)
Be - Beryllium sample
IGB - Impinger and back half acetone and water and rinses, and
backup filter combined.
I - Impinger and back half acetone and water rinses combined
P - Probe particulate and probe acetone wash combined
F - Filter
-13-
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
E.P.A. Test No.
Name of Firm Speedring Manufacturing Company
No. of Runs
Location of Plant Cullman. Alabama
Type of Plant Beryllium Machinery
Control Equipment Baghouse
Sampling Point Location North stack
Pollutants Sampled
Beryllium Dust
Run No.
Date
'Time Began
Time End
Barometric Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Meter Orifice Pressure Drop, "h^O
Volume of Dry Gas Meter @ Meter Cond., ft3
Ave. Meter Temp. , F
Volume of Gas Sampled @ Stack Cond., ft3
Volume of H20 Collected in Impingers &
Silica Gel, ml2
Volume of Water Vapor Collected & Stack
Cond., ft3 •
Stack Gas Moisture, % Volume
Mole Fraction of Dry Stack Gas
N-l-MP
8/10/71
0915
1125
29.95
3.790
145.767
91.6
152.51
28.5
1.47
0.96
0.9904
N-l-G
8/10/71
0923
1133
29.95
3.480
135.916
90.0
143.28
20.5
1.06
0.74
0.9926
N-2-MP
8/10/71
1405
1615
29.95 -
4.220
158.101
87.0
165.09
12.5
0.64
0.39
0.9961
N-l-G
8/10/71
1410
1620
29.95
3.900.
145.179
86.0
151.82
8.0
0.41
0.27
0.9973
-14-
-------
Run No.
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, @ Stack Cond.
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry
Stack Gas Sp. Gravity, Ref. to Air
Ave. Sq. Root of Velocity Head, "H20
Ave. Stack Gas Temp., °F
Pi tot Corr. Factor
Stack Pressure, "Hg Absolute
Stack Gas Velocity @ Stack Cond., fpm
Stack Area, ft2
Stack Gas Flow Rate @ Stack Cond., cfm
. Net Time of Test, min.
Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
Percent Isokinetic
Beryllium Catch, Probe, yg
Beryllium Catch, Filter, yg
Beryllium Catch, Total, yg
Beryllium Concentration, Probe, Stack
Cond.., yg/m3
Beryllium Concentration, Filter, Stack
Cond. , yg/m3
Beryllium Concentration, Total, Stack
Cond. , yg/m-5
28.86
28.97
1.00
1.023
116.0
0.85
.29.9
3632
0.78
2720
120
0.250
102.7
0.45
0.30
13.80
0.10
0.07
3.20
(Sam<
28.89
28.97
1.00
1.046
119.5
0.85
29.9
3725
0.78
2800
120
0.250
94.0
3.13
0.15
11.23
0.77
0.04
2.77
)
28.93
28.97
1.00
1.092
114.0
0.85
29.9
3869
0.78
2920
120
0.250
104.3
0.00
0.00
1.90
0.00
0.00
0.41
28.94
28.97
1.00
1.096
114.0
0.85
29.9
3885
0.78
2939
120
0.250
95.5
3.05
0.31
3.70
0.71
0.07
0.86
-15-
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
E.P.A. Test No.
Name of Firm Speedring Manufacturing Company
No. of Runs
Location of Plant_
Type of Plant
Cullman, Alabama
Beryllium Machinery
Control Equipment Baghouse
Sampling Point Location Middle Stack
Pollutants Sampled Beryllium Dust
Run No.
Date
Time Began
Time End
Barometric Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Meter Orifice Pressure Drop, "H20
Volume of Dry Gas Meter @ Meter Cond. , ft3
Ave. Meter Temp. , °F
Volume of Gas Sampled @ Stack Cond., ft3
Volume of ^0 Collected in Impingers &
Silica Gel, ml2
Volume of Water Vapor Collected & Stack
Cond. , ft3
Stack Gas Moisture, % Volume
Mole Fraction of Dry Stack Gas
M-l-MP
8/11/71
0750
1000
29.90
1.720
101.874
80.0
109.96
19.5
1.01
0.92
0.9908
M-l-G
8/11/71
0754
1004
29.9
1.810
101.344
81.0
125.61
23.0
-1.37
1.09
.9891
-
-16-
-------
Run No.
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, @ Stack Cond.
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry
Stack Gas Sp. Gravity, Ref. to Air
Ave. Sq. Root of Velocity Head, "H20
Ave. Stack Gas Temp. , °F
Pi tot Corr. Factor
Stack Pressure, "Hg Absolute
Stack Gas Velocity @ Stack Cond., fpm -
Stack Area, ft2
Stack Gas Flow Rate @ Stack Cond., cfm
Net Time of Test, min.
Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
Percent Isokinetic
Beryllium Catch, Probe,. yg
Beryllium Catch, Filter, yg
Beryllium Catch, Total, yg
Beryllium Concentration, Probe, Stack
Cond. ,. yg/m3
Beryllium Concentration, Filter, Stack
Cond. , yg/m3
Beryllium Concentration, Total, Stack
Cond. , yg/m3
(San
28.87
28.97
1.00
0.313
120
0.85
29.9
1116
0.78
855
120
0.375
107.1
0.20
0.05
1.30
0.06
0.02
0.42
e)
28.85
28.97
1.00
0.320
120
0.85
29.9
1222
0.78
935
120
0.375
103.9
0.60
0.00
1.45
0.17
0.00
0.41
"
-17-
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
E.P.A. Test No..
Name of Firm
No. of Runs
Speedring Manufacturing Company
Location of Plant_
Type of Plant
Cullman, Alabama
Beryllium Machinery
Control Equipment^
Baghouse
Sampling Point Location South stack
Pollutants Sampled_
Beryllium Dust
Run No.
Date
Time Began
Time End
Barometric Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Meter Orifice Pressure Drop, "H^O
Volume of Dry Gas Meter @ Meter Cond., ft3
Ave. Meter Temp. , °F
Volume of Gas Sampled @ Stack Cond., ft3
Volume of ^0 Collected in Impingers &
Silica Gel, ml2
Volume of Water Vapor Collected & Stack
Cond., ft3
Stack Gas Moisture, % Volume
Mole Fraction of Dry Stack Gas
S-l-MP
8/11/71
1445.
1655
29.90
1.650
100.112
95.0
105.54
15.5
0,81 .
0.77
0.9923
S-l-G
8/11/71
1342
1552
29.9
1.560
96.572
95.0
103.09
39.0
2.04
1.98
0.9802
S- 2-MP
8/12/71
0830
1040
29.90
1.650
90.240
79.0
97.50
29.5
1.51
1.55
0.9845
S-2-G
8/12/71
0833
1043
30.0
T.340
88.260
78.0
95.29
24.0
1.23
1.29
0.9871
-18-
-------
Run No.
Molecular Height of Stack Gas, @ Stack Cond.
Molecular Height of Stack Gas, Dry
Stack Gas Sp. Gravity, Ref. to Air
Ave. Sq. Root of Velocity Head, "H20
Ave. Stack Gas Temp., °F
Pi tot Corr. Factor
Stack Pressure, "Hg Absolute
Stack Gas Velocity @ Stack Cond., fpm
«
Stack Area, ft2
Stack Gas Flow Rate @ Stack Cond., cfm
Net Time of Test, min.
Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
'Percent Isokinetic
Beryllium Catch, Probe, yg
Beryllium Catch, Filter, yg
Beryllium Catch, Total, yg
Beryllium Concentration, Probe, Stack
Cond. , yg/m3
Beryllium Concentration, Filter, Stack
Cond. , yg/nr
Beryllium Concentration, Total, Stack
Cond. , yg/m3
28.88
28.97
1.00
0.706
123.0
0.85
29.9
2523
0.78
'1882
120
0.250
102.3
0.95
1.00
12.50
0.32
0.33
4.18 '
( Sarm
28.75
28.97
0.99
0.695
123
0.85
29.9
2484
0.78
1853
120
0.250
101.5
1.68
0.25
7.53
0.53
0.09
2.58
)
28.80
28.97
1.00
0.629
115.2
0.85
30.0
2232
0.78
1721
120
0.250
107.1
1.10
0.45
5.80
0.40
0.16
2.10
28.83
28.97
1.00
0.644
115.3
0.85
30.0
2285
0.78
1765
120
0.250
102.3
0.55
0.00
1.65
0.20
0.00
0.61
-19-
-------
COMPLETE SAMPLING PROCEDURES USED FOR BERYLLIUM SAMPLING
Prior to performing the actual beryllium particulate runs,
certain preliminary stack and stack gas parameters had to be deter-
mined for each source. This preliminary data included the average
temperature, velocity head, moisture content, and the stack diameter
at the point where the tests were being performed.
The stack gas temperature was determined by using bimetallic
thermometers and mercury bulb thermometers.
Velocity head measurements were determined across the stack
diameter by using a calibrated S-type pi tot tube with an inclined
manometer. This data was used to select the sampling nozzle diameter.
The approximate moisture content of the stack gas was determined
by the wet-bulb and dry-bulb thermometer technique since the stack
gas temperature was below 212°F.
The sampling traverse points were selected so that a represen-
tative sample could be extracted from the gas stream. The traverse
points for circular stacks were located in the center of the annular
equal area circles selected, which were dependent upon diameter and
duct diameters downstream from flow disturbances.
The basic modification of the EPA particulate sampling train for
beryllium sampling was the selection of filter media. Tests were
performed with the standard glass fiber filter and also with a type AA
millipore filter. A schematic diagram of the sampling train used is
shown in Figure A-l.
-20-
-------
The gases sampled were collected through the following train:
a stainless steel nozzle; a glass probe; a filter; two impingers with
100 ml of distilled water; one dry impinger; one impinger with 180
grams of silica gel (the second impinger had a standard tip, while
the first, third, and fourth impingers had modified tips with 1/2-inch
ID opening); a flexible sample line; an air-tight pump; a dry test
meter; and finally, a calibrated orifice.
At Speedring, Inc., two sampling trains were used simultaneously
at the fabricated effluent stack from the baghouse. One train contained
only a glass fiber filter and the other contained a mi Hi pore filter
backed up by a glass fiber filter.
Each test run consisted of sampling for a specified time at each
traverse point through either a vertical or a horizontal sampling
position for the first half of the test run, and then switching to the
other sampling position for the second half of the run. Duplicate
samples were taken from all sources except for one source. In all
cases, the train using a millipore filter was placed in the'vertical
position (port opening located at top of horizontal duct), starting
with the sampling point nearest the bottom of the duct. The sampling
train containing the glass fiber filter always started in the horizontal
position at the traverse point nearest the port opening. After gases
were withdrawn at the selected six points, the probes (still attached
to their respective trains) were switched from vertical to horizontal
positions and vice versa. Both trains were used simultaneously.
-21-
-------
18
1. Nozzle (stainless steel)
2. Probe (Pyrex glass tubing inside stainless steel shaft)
3. Filter
4
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
13
14.
15
16.
17.
18.
Ice bath
Impinger with 100 ml distilled water
(modified tip)
Impinger with 100 ml distilled water
Impinger, dry (modified tip)
Impinger with silica gel
(modified tip)
Thermometer
Flexible sample line
Vacuum gauge
Main control valve
Air tight vacuum pump
By-pass control valve
Dry test meter
Calibrated orifice
Inclined manometer
"S" type pitot tube
FIGURE A -1 BERYLLIUM SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
Sample recovery for all beryllium tests was accomplished by the
following procedure:
1. Each filter was removed from its holder and placed
in Container No. 1 and sealed.
2. All sample-exposed surfaces prior to the filter were
washed with acetone and placed into Container No. 2
and sealed.
3. The volume of water in the first three impingers
was measured and then placed into Container No. 3.
The water rinsings of all sample-exposed surfaces
between the back half of the filter holder and
fourth impinger were also placed into Container
No. 3 prior to sealing.
4. The used silica gel from the fourth impinger was
transferred to the original tared container and
sealed.
5. All sample-exposed surfaces between the back half
of the filter holder and the fourth impinger were
rinsed with acetone and the rinsings were placed
into Container No. 5 and sealed.
-23-
-------
PARTICULATE TEST CALCULATIONS
. Date &-/O-7/
Plant Sfee-clrirtc* M-fft. Co. , Stack,
Mr. Press. 29. ff£ "Hgt Stack Press. 29. 9£ "Hg. Stack Dia. /Z in.. Stack Area £?.
Ave. Stack Tenp. //fo °F. Ave. Meter Temp. yX£°F. Ave.A/TT_^£££"H20, Nozzle Dia. O* 2,
f
in
2
I
ml. Sample Time
Ave. Orifice AH
"H20
O.B3. Meter Vol. /<££ 7£7 ft^. Moisture plus Silica Gel.
sat AnalysisIv CCb - #. 0? - %. CO - ^. N? — ^
fzzle Dia. and Areai 1/4 in. 0.0003^1 ft2, 3/8 in. 0.000767 ft2, 1/2 in. 0.0013 ft2
) VHV = (0*0474) -x. (Moisture + Silica Gel)ml , a /• 357
Vstpd= (17-71) x (Po +^K-) x (Vm)
3) vt = (vw) + (vstpd)
min.
8)
I
I
8
I
I,
i
L2)
FDA =(1.0) - (W)
M
[(0.32)x( _ 5J02)] + [To.28)x(
= &Id) x (FDA)j
Q = J
s 28.99
) Excess Air, EA =
[O.266)x(
x 100
U = (1?^) x (Cp) x
Q3« (0)x (As)
Qd = (Qs) x (FDA)
'29.92
I
i
I!
70
\\ = (D) x (An) :c (FDA) x (Tims) x ( ^ ^
S
x 100
Ar \
Percent Isokinetic = •• ^^
Vi '
(5.626) x (T5 + 460) x (O
Percent Isokinetic by the EPA Method ="(f) x (Time) x (?s) x (?DA)'X (An) =
18) E12 . (12L; ffi^ 19) EW = (W X ^1C^ * S^-
_ (15.43) x (Y)
x (0.00857)
150
_fp~
I
Particulate Lab Analysis
(I)
Particulate Concentrations,
f- \ /
Ustp)
Emission Rate, Ibs/hx
(E>a)
7.
Total
-24-
-------
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
481
Subparl E—Standards of Perform-
ance for Nitric Acid Plants
§ 466.50 Applicability and designation
of affected facility.
(a) The provisions of *Ns subpart are
applicable to nitric acid piants.
(b)'For purposes of §4GG.ll(e), the
entire plant is the affected facility.
§466.51 Definitions.
As u.ert in this part, all terms not de-
fined herein shall have the meaning given
them in the Act:
(a) "Nitric acid plant" means any
facility producing weak nitric acid by
either the pressure or atmospheric pres-
sure process.
• (b) "Weak nitric acid" means acid
which is 50 to 70 percent in strength.
§ 466.52 Standard for nitrogen oxides.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of nitrogen
oxides in the eflluent which are:
(a) In excess of 3 Ibs. per ton of acid
produced (1.5 Kgm. per metric ton),
maximum 2-hour average, expressed as
NO.
(b) A visible emission within the
meaning of this part. . .
§ 466.53 Emission monitoring.
(a) There shall be installed, cali-
brated, maintained, and operated, in any
nitric acid plant subject to the provisions
of vhis subpart, an instrument for con-
tinuously monitoring and recording
emissions of nitrogen oxides.
(b) The instrument installed and used'
pursuant to this section shall have a
confidence level of at least 95 percent and
be accurate within ±20 percent and shall
be calibrated in accordance with the
method (s) prescribed by the manufac-
turer^) of such instrument; the instru-
ment shall be calibrated at least once
per year unless the inanufacturer(s)
specifies or recommends calibration at
shorter intervals, in which case such
specifications or recommendations shall
be followed.
(c) The owner or operator of any
nitric acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall maintain a file of all
measurements required by this subpart
and shall retain the record of any such
measurement for at least 1 year fojlow-
ing the date of such measurement.
§ -166.5-1 Tost methods and procedures.
(a) The provisions of this section are
applicable to performance tests for deter-
mining emissions of nitrogen oxides from
nitric acid plants.
(b) All performance tests shall be con-
ducted while the affected facility is
operating at or above the acid product
rate for which such facility \vas designed.
(c) Test methods set forth in the ap-
pendix to this part shall be used as
follows:
(1) For each repetition the NO, con-
centration shall be determined by using
Method 7. The sampling location shall be
selected according to Method 1 and the
sampling point shall be the centroid of
the stack or duct. The sampling time
shall be 2 hours and four samples shall
be taken during each 2-hour period.
(2) The volumetric flow rate of the
total efiluent shall be determined by us-
ing Method 2 and traversing according
to Method 1. Gas analysis shall be per-
formed by Method 3, and moisture con-
tent shall be determined by Method 4.
(d) Acid produced, expressed in tons
per hour of 100 percent weak nitric acid,
shall be determined during each 2-hour
testing period by suitable flow meters and
shall be confirmed by a material balance
over the production system.
(e) For each repetition, nitrogen ox-
Ides emissions, expressed in Ib./ton of
weak nitric acid, shall be determined by
dividing the emission rate in ib./hr. by
the acid produced. The emission rate
shall be determined by the equation, lb./
hr.=QxC, where Q=volumetric flow
rate of the effluent in ft.yhr. at standard
conditions, dry basis, as determined in
accordance with ! 466.54(d) (2), and
C=NO< concentration in Ib./f t.3, as deter-
mined in accordance with § 4G6.54(d) (1),
corrected to standard conditions, dry
basis.
Subpart F—Standards of Perform-
ance for Sulfuric Acid Plants
§ 466.60 Applicability and designation
of affected facility.
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to sulfur acid plants,
(b).,For purposes of § 466.11 (e) the en-
tire plant is the affected facility.
§ 466.61 Definitions.
As used in this part, all terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning
given them in the Act:
(a) "Sulfuric acid plant" means any
facility producing sulfuric acid by the
contact process by burning elemental sul-
fur, alkylation acid, hydrogen sulfide,
organic sulfides and mercaptans, or acid
sludge.
(b) "Acid mist" means sulfur acid mist,
as measured by test methods set forth
in this part.
§ 466.62 Standard for sulfur dioxide.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of sulfur di-
oxide in the eiTHient in excess of 4 Ibs.
per ton of acid produced (2 kgm. per
metric ton), maximum 2-hour average.
§ 166.63 Standard for acid mist.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of acid mist
in the eflluent which is:
(a) In excess of 0.15 lb. per ton of acid
produced 10.075 Kgm. per metric ton),
maximum 2-hour average, expressed as
H;SO,.
(b) A visible emission within the
meaning of this part.
§ -tfi6.64- Emission monitoring.
(a) There shall be installed, calibrated,
maintained, and operated, in any sulfuric
acid plant subject to the provisions of
this subpart, an instrument for continu-
ously monitoring and recording emis-
sions of sulf ur dioxide.
(b) The instrument installed and used
pursuant to this section shall have a con-
fidence level of at least 95 percent and be
accurate within ±20 percent end shall
be calibrated in accordance with the
method (s) prescribed by the manufac-
turcr(s) of such instrument, the instru-
ment shall be calibrated at least once per
year unless the manufacturers) speci-
fies or recommends calibration at shorter
intervals, in which case such speciilca,-
tions or recommendations shall be fol-
lowed.
(c) The owner or operator of any sul-
furic acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall maintain a file of
all measurements required by this sub-
part and shall retain the record of any
such measurement for at least 1 year
following the date of such measurement.
§ 466.65 Test methods and procedures.
(a) The provisions of this section are
applicable to performance tests for de-
termining emissions of acid mist and sul-
fur dioxide from sulfuric acid plants.
(b) All performance tests shall be con-
ducted while the affected facility is op-
erating at or above the acid production
rate for which such facility was designed.
(c) Test methods set forth in the
appendix to this part shall be used as
follows:
(1) For each repetition the acid mist
and SO: concentrations shall be deter-
mined by using Method 8 and traversing
according to Method 1. The sampling
time shall be 2 hours, and sampling vol-
ume shall be 40 ft.3 corrected to standard
conditions.
(2) The volumetric flow rate of the
total effluent shall be determined by us-
ing Method 2 and traversing according
to Method 1. Gas analysis shall be per-
formed by Method 3. Moisture content
can be considered to be zero.
(d) Acid produced, expressed in tons
per hour of 100 percent sulfuric acid
shall be determined during each 2-hour
testing period by suitable flow meters
and shall be confirmed by a material
balance over the production system.
(e) For each repetition, acid mist and
sulfur dioxide emissions, expressed in
Ib./ton of sulfuric acid shall be deter-
mined by dividing the emission rate in
Ib./lir. by the acid produced. The emis-
sion rate shall be determined by the
equation, lb./hr.=QxC, where Q=volu-
metric flow rate of the effluent in ft.Vhr.
at standard conditions, dry basis, as de-
termined in accordance with 5 -iljG.GSCd)
(2), and C=acid mist and SO; concen-
trations in lb./ft.: as determined in ac-
cordance with § 46G.G5(d) (1), corrected
to standard conditions, dry basis.
APPENDIX—TEST METHODS
METHOD I SAMPLE AND VELOCITY TUAVEI1SES
FOR STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. A sampling site and the
number of traverse points arc selected to
aid In the extraction of a representative
sample.
1.2 Applicability. This method should bo
applied only when specified by the lest pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
Copyright © 1971 by The Bureau ol Notional Affairs, Inc.
-------
m
3
73
re
•o
o
Now Source Performance Standards. This
method Is not Intended to apply to gas
streams other than those emitted directly to
the atmosphere without further processing.
2. Procedure.
2.1 Selection of a sampling site and mini-
mum number of traverse points.
2.1.1 Select a sampling site that Is at
least eight stack or duct diamerers down-
stream and two diameters upstream from
a:>.y How disturbance such ns a bend, expan-
sion, contraction, or visible llamc. For a
rectangular cross section, determine an
equivalent diameter from the following
equation:
equivalent
ength
J
equation 1-1
2.1.2 v/hen the above sampling site cri-
teria can be met, the minimum number of
, traverse points Is twelve (12).
2.1.3 Some sampling situations render th<5
above sampling site criteria Impractical.
When this Is the case, choose a convenient
sampling location tmd use Figure 1—1 to
determine the minimum number of traverse
points,
2.1.4 To use Figure 1-1 flrst measure the
distance from the chosen sampling location
to the nearest upstream and downstream
disturbances. Determine the corresponding
number or traverse points for each distance
from Figure 1-1. Select the higher of the two
numbers of traverse points, or a greater value.
such that for circular stacks the number Is
a multiple of four, and for rectangular stacks
the number follows the criteria of section
2.2.2.
2.2 Cross sectional layout and location of
traverse points.
2.2.1 For circular stacks locate the traverse
points on two perpendicular diameters ac-
cording to Figure 1-2 and Table 1-1.
0.5
1.0
NUMBER Of DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM'
(DISTANCE A)
1.5 2.0
2.5
50
2 40
O
30
20
10
Y
A
j
T
B
1
T
4
7DISTURBANCE
_ SAMPLING
"" SITE
DISTURBANCE
•FROM POINT OF ANY TYPE OF
DISTURBANCE (BEND, EXPANSION; CONTRACTION, ETC.)
Figure 1-2. Cross, section of circular stack showing location of
traverse points on perpendicular diameters.
1
1
0 S 0
1
1
______ p— _
1
1
O 1 O
I
1
T
1
1
O I O
1
f
1
•
0
o
o
o
e
c
Figure 1-3. Cross section of rectangular stack divided into 12 equal
areas, with traverse points at centroid of each area.
•a
O
10
NUMBER OF DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM*
(DISTANCE B)
Figure 1-1. Minimum number of traversa points.
33
m
-o
O
33
H
m
33
-------
Table 1-1. Location of traverse points in circular stacks
(Percent of stack diameter from inside v/all to traverse point)
n
o
•a
-sj
H
•3-
!3
Traverse
point
number
on a
diameter
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
n
15
15
17
18
13
20
21
22
23
24
Number of
6 8 10
4.4 3.3 2
14.7 10.5 8
29.5 19.4 14
70.5 32.3 22
85.3 67.7 34
95.6 80.6 65
89.5 77
95.7 85
91
97
5
2
6
6
2
8
4
4
8
5
"12
2.1;
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.5
64.5
75.0
82.3
83.2
93.3
97.9
traverse
14
1.8
5.7
9.9
14.6
20.1 •
26.9
35.6
63.4.
73.l'
79.9
85.4
90.1
94.3
98.2
points
16
1
4
8
12
16
22
28
37
62
71
78
83
87
91
95
98
6
9
5
5
9
0
3
5
5
7
0
1
5
5
1
4
on a
18
1.4
4.4
7.5
10.9
14.6
18.8
23.6
29.6
38.2
61.8
70.4
76.4
81.2
85.4
89.1
92.5
95.6
98.6
diameter
20
1
3
3.9
6
9
12
16
20
25
30
38
61
69
75
79
83
87
90
93
96
98
7
7
9
5
4
0
6
8
2
4
0
6
5
1
3
3
1
7
22
1.1
3.5
6.0
8.7
11.6
14.6
18.0
21.8
26.1
31.5
39.3
60.7
68.5
73.9
78.2
82.0
85.4
88.4
91.3
94.0
96.5
98.9
24
1.1
3.2
5.5
7.9
10.5
13.2
16.1
19.4
23.0
27.2
32.3
39.8
60.2
67.7
72.8
77.0
80.6
83.9
86.8
89.5
92.1
94.5
35.8
98.9
not be vised In the case of nondlrecttonal
flow.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Pltot tube—Type S (Figure 2-1). or
equivalent.
2.2 DiScrential pressure gauge—Inclined
manometer, or equivalent, to measure ve-
locity head to within 10 percent of the mlnl-
' mum valve.
2.3. Temperature gauge—Thermocouples,
bimetallic thermometers, liquid filled sys-
tems, or equivalent, to measure stack tem-
perature to within 1.5 percent of the mini-
mum absolute stack temperature.
2.4 Pressure gauge—Mercury-filled U-tube
manometer, or equivalent, to measure stack
pre:;sure to within 0.1 In. Hg.
2.5 Barometer—To measure atmospheric
pressure to within 0.1 In. Hg.
2.2.2. For rectangular stacks divide the
cross section Into as many equal rectangular
areas as traverse points, such that the ratio
of the length to the width of the elemental
areas Is bef.vcen one and two. Locate the tra-
verse points at the centrold of each equal
area according to Figure 1-3.
3. References. Determining Dust Concen-
tration In a Gas Stream. ASME Performance
Test Code #21. New York. 1957.
Devorkln. Howard, ct al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
V.'eitern Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co. Los Angeles. Bulletin V/P-50.
19(58.
Standard Method lor Sampling Stacks for
Fartlculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
Standards, Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2923-71.
METHOD 2—DETERMINATION Of STACK OAS
VELOCITY (TYPE S PITOT TUBE)'
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Stack gas velocity Is de-
termined from the gas density and from
measurement of the velocity head using a
Type S (Stauschetbe or reverse type) pltot
tube.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
New Source Performance Standards. Being a
directional Instrument, a pltot tube should
2.0 Gas analyzer—To analyze gas compo-
sition for determining molecular weight.
2.7 Pltot tube—Standard type, to cali-
brate Type S pltot tube.
3. Procedure.
3.1 Set up the apparatus as shown In Fig-
ure 2-1. Muke sure all connections are tight
and leak free. Measure the velocity head at
the traverse points specified by Method 1.
3.2 Men-sure the temperature of the stack
gas. If the total temperature variation with
time Is less than 50' P., a point measurement
will suillce. Otherwise, conduct e. temperu-
turo traverse.
3.3 Measure the static pressure In tho
stack.
3.4 Determine the stack gas molecular
weight by gas analysis and appropriate cal-
culation as Indicated In Method 3.
PIPE COUPLING
TUBING ADAPTER
Figure 2-1. Pilot tube - manometer assembly.
4. Calibration.
4.1 To calibrate the pitot tube, measure
tho velocity head at some point In a flowing
gas stream with both a Type S pltot tube and
a standard type pltot tube with known co-
efficient. The velocity of the flowing gas
stream should be within the normal working
range.
-------
484
ENVIRONMENT REPORTER
43 Calculate the pltot tube coefficient then the other pointed downstream. Use the
using Equation 2-1. P'tot tube only If the two coefficients differ
by no more than 0.01.
6. Calculations.
Use Equation 2-2 to calculate the stack gas
where:
Cple., = Pilot tube coefficient of Type S
pltot tube.
C,,M=Pltot tube coefficient of standard
type pltot tube (if unknown, use *'"«:
0.99).
ap.u=Vcloclty head measured by stand-
ard type pltot tube.
AP,.it = Velocity head measured by Type S
pltot tube.
velocity.
V.=KpCp-y p-,^ equation :-2
V.=Stock gas velocity, feet per second (f.p.s.).
when these units
arc used.
4.3 Compare the coefficients of the Type S
pltot tube determined first with one leg and
Cp = Pitot tube eoi'flicient, diniPiisionlcss.
T. = Absolute stack ras trmpcrature, °H.
4p=Vel(K-ily head of stack ens. in II;O (sec fig. 2-2).
P*=Absolute stack p»3 pressure, in lip.
Mi**Mulecular Wtiulit 01 stuck BUS, lb..lb.-niole.
PLANT,
DATE
RUN NO.
STACK DIAMETER, in.__
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK (Pg|, in. Hg._
OPERATORS
SCHEMATIC OF STACK
CROSS SECTION
Traverse point
number
Velocity head,
in. H20
•
AVERAGE:
v£7
Stack Temperature
(%1,'F
Figure 2-2. Velocity traverse data.
Figure 2-2 shows a sample .recording sheet
for velocity traverse data. Use the averages In
the last two columns of Figure 2-2 to deter-
mine the average stack gas velocity from
Equation 2-2.
6. References.
Mark, L. S. Mechanical Engineers' Hand-
book. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York,
1951.
Perry, J. H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1900.
Shlgehara. R. T., W. F. Todd. and W. S.
Smith. Significance of Errors in Stack Sam-
pling Measurements. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association. St. LOuis, Mo., June 14-19, 1970.
Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for
Partlculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
standards. Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
Vennard, J. K. Elementary Fluid Mechanics.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1947.
METHOD 3 CAS ANALYSIS FOR CARBON DIOXIDE,
EXCESS AIR, AND DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT
I. Principle and- applicability,
1.1 Principle. An Integrated or grab gas
sample Is extracted from a sampling point
and analyzed for Its components using an
'Orsat analyzer.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Grab sample (Figure 3-1).
2.1.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex'
glass, eqxiipped with a filter to remove par-
tlculate matter.
2.1.2 Pump—One-way squeeze, bulb, or
equivalent, to transport gas sample to ana-
lyzer.
2.2 Integrated sample (Figure 3-2).
2.2.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex»
glass equipped with a filter to remove par-
tlculate matter.
2.2.2 Air-cooled condenser—To remove
any excess moisture.
2.2.3 Needle valve—To adjust flow rate.
2.2.4 Pump—Leak-free, diaphragm type,
or equivalent,-to pull gas.
2.2.5 Rate motor—To measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.035 c.f jn.
2.2.G Flexible bag—Tedlar,* or equivalent,
•with ti capacity of 2 to 3 cu. ft. Leak test the
bag In the laboratory before using.
2.2.7 Pitot tube—Type S, or equivalent,
attached to the probe so that the sampling
flow rate can be regulated proportional to the,
etack gas velocity when velocity is varying
with time or a sample traverse is conducted.
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 Orsat analyzer, or equivalent.
3. Procedure.
"3.1 Grab sampling.
3.1.1 Set up the equipment as shown In
Figure 3-1. Place the probe In the stack at a
campling point and purge the sampling line.
1 Trade name.
Environment Reporter
-------
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
485
PROBE
KV
FLEXIBLE TUBING
FILTER (GLASS WOOL]
SQUEEZE BULB
Figure 3-1. Grab-sampling train.
RATE METER
VALVE
AIR-COOLED CONDENSER
PRODE
QUICK DISCONNECT
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
Figure 3-2. Integrated gas - sampling train.
where:
3.1.2 Draw sample into the analyzer.
3.2 Integrated sampling.
3.2.1 Evacuate tlie flexible bag. Set up the
equipment as shown In Figure 3-2 with the
bag disconnected. Place the probe In the
stack and purge the sur.ipling line. Connect
the bag, making sure that all connections
(ire tight and that there arc no leaks.
3.2.2 Sample at a rate proportional to the
stack gas velocity.
3.3 Analysis.
3.3.1 Determine the CO-. Oo. and CO con-
centrations as soon as possible. Make ar. many
passes as arc necessary to give constant read-
Ings. If more than 10 passes are necessary,
replace the absorbing solution.
3.3.2 For integrated sampling, repeat the
analysis until three consecutive runs vary
no more than 0.2 percent by volume for each
component being analyzed.
4. Calculations.
4.1 Carbon dioxide. Average the three
consecutive runs and report result to the
nearest 0.1 percent CO-'.
4.2 Excess air. Use Equation 3-1 to cal-
culate excess air, and average the runs. Re-
port the result to the nearest 0.1 percent
excess uir.
^cEA = Percent excess air.
?iO.,=Percent oxygen by volume, dry
basis.
%N.,r:Pcrccnt nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
•X CO = Percent carbon monoxide by vol-
ume, dry basis.
0.2G4 = Ratlo of oxygen to nitrogen in air
by volume.
4.3 Dry molecular weight. Use Equation
3-2 to calculate dry molecular -weight and
average the runs. Report the result to the
nearest tenth.
Md:=0.44(% CO..) -|-0.32(% O,)
+ 0.28(% N,+ % CO)
Equation 3-2
where:
d = Dry molecular
mole.
OsH-O.oCVi CO)X10°
equation 3-1
carbon dioxide by .volume,
dry basis.
%O.,:= Percent oxygen by volume, dry
basis,
?iN., = Pcrccnt nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
0.44 = Molecular weight of carbon dioxide
divided by 100.
0.32 = Molecular weight of oxygen
divided by 100.
0.28 = Molccular weight of nitrogen
divided by 100^
5. Reference}
TO ANALYZER Altshullcr, A. P., et al. Storage of Oases
and Vapors in Plastic Bags. Int. J. Air &
Water Pollution. 6':75-3l. 19U3.
Conner, William D., and J. S. Nader. Air
Sampling with Plastic Bags. Journal of the
American Industrial Hygiene Association.
25:291-297. May-June 1964.
Dovorkin, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 19G3.
METHOD 1—DETERMINATION OF MOISTUKE IN
STACK CASES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Moisture Is removed from
the gas stream, condensed, and determined
gravlmotrically.
1.2 Applicability. This method Is appli-
cable for the determination of moisture in
stack gas only when specified by test proce-
dures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards. This method
does not apply when liquid droplets are pres-
ent In the gas stream.2
Other methods such as drying tubes, wet
bulb-dry bulb techniques, and volumetric
condensation techniques may be used sub-
ject to the approval of the Administrator.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex l glass
sufficiently heated to prevent conder.sai.ion
and equipped with a filter to remove par-
tlculate matter.
2.2 Impingers—Two midget Implngers,
each with 30 ml. capacity, or equivalent.
2.3 Ice bath container—To condense
moisture In impingers.
2.4: Silica gel tube—To protect'pump and
dry gas meter.
2.5 Needle valve—To regulate gas flow
rate.
2.6 NPump—Leak-free, diaphragm type, or
equivalent, to pull gas through train.
2.7 Dry gas meter—To measure to within
1 percent of the total sample volume.
2.8 Rotamcter—To measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.1 c.f.in.
2.9 Balance—Capable of measuring to the
.nearest 0.1 g.
2.10 Barometer—Sufficient to read to
within 0.1 in. Hg.
2.11 Pilot tube—Type S. or equivalent, at-
tached to probe so that the sampling now
rate can be regulated proportional to the
stack gas velocity when velocity Is varying
with time or a sample traverse Is conducted.
3. Procedure.
3.1 Place about 5 ml. distilled water in
each implnger and weigh the implm-er and
contents to the nearest 0.1 g. Assemble the
apparatus without the probe as shown in Fig-
ure 4-1. Leak check by plugging the inlet to
the first Implnger and drawing a vacuum. In-
sure that flow through the dry gas meter is
less than 1 percent of the sampling rate.
3.2 Connect the probe, and sample at a
constant rate of 0.075 c.f.m. or'at a rate pro-
portional to the stack gas velocity not to ex-
ceed 0.075 c.f.m. Continue sampling until the
dry gas meter registers 1 cu. ft. or until visible
liquid droplets arc carried over from the lirst
Implnger to the second. Record temperature,
pressure, and dry gas meter reading as re-
quired by Figure 4-2.
3.3 After collecting the sample, weigh the
Impingers and their contents again to the
nearest 0.1 g.
weight, lb./lb.-
i Trade name.
- If liquid droplets arc present In the gas
stream, assume the stream to be saturated,
determine the average stack gas temperature
(Method !). and use a psychromctrlc chart
to obtain nn approximation of the moisture
percentage.
Copyright <£ 1971 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
-------
486
ENVIRONMENT REPORTER
1. Calculation}.
4.1 Volume of water collected.
(o.0474 — )(Wf-\V,)
\ D* /
equation 4-1
where:
Vwo=Volume of water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
Wt=Flnal -weight of Implngcrs and
contents, p.
Wi.=:lnltlal weight of lonpingers and
contents, g.
R= Ideal gas constant. 21.83-ln. Hg —
cu. ft./lb. mole-* R.
T,,4=.' 'isolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
P. 14=: Pressure at standard conditions,
29.92 in. Hg.
M»=Molecular weight of water, 18
Ib./lb. mole.
4.2 Gas volume.
SILICA GEL TUBE
HEATED PROBE
FILTER'(GLASS Y/OOL)
ROTAMETER
DRY GAS METER
ICE BATH
LOCATION.
TEST
DATE
OPERATOR.
Fiflure 4-1. Moisture-sampling train.
._ . . COMMENTS
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE,
CLOCK TIME
GAS VOLUME THROUGH
METER, ivmi,
it3
ROTAMETER SETTING,
Ii3/min
METER TEMPERATURE.
°F
in. Hg/ ,Tm equation 4-2
where:
Voc=Dry gas volume through meter at
standard conditions, cu. ft.
Vm=Dry gas volume measured by meter,
cu. ft.
PH=:Barometric pressure at the dry gas
meter, In. Hg.
P.,d=Prcssure at standard conditions,
29.92-in. Hg.
T,td=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
Tin =: Absolute temperature at meter
("F.+4GO), °R.
4.3 Moisture content.
B.
"vwo+vn
-+ (0.025)
Figure 4-Z. Field moislurc dctermlnalion.
equation 4-3
where:
Bwo=ProportIon by volume of water
vapor in the gas stream, dimen-
slonless.
Vwc =;Volume of water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
Vme=Dry gas volume through meter
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
B»m=Approximate volumetric proportion
of water vapor in the gns stream
leaving the Impingers, 0.02S.
6. References.
Air Pollution Engineering Manual,
Danlclson, J. A. (ed.). U.S. DHEW, PUS,
National Center for Air Pollution Control.
Cincinnati, Ohio. PHS Publication No.
999-Ap-30. 1967.
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. LOF Angeles, Calif. November
1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co., Los Angeles, Calif. Bulletin
WP-50. IOCS.
METHOD 5. DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. PartlculrUe matter is with-
drawn isokinetlcnlly from the source and its
weight Is determined gravimctrlcally after
removal of uncomblncd water.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applica-
ble for the determination of paniculate
omissions from stationary sources only when
specified by the test procedures for deter-
mining compliance with New Source Per- .
formancc Standards.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Sampling train. The design specifica-
tions of the participate sampling train used
by EPA (Figure 5-1) are described in AFTD-
0581. Commercial models of this train arc
available.
2.1.1 Noszle—Stainless steel (31G) with
sharp, tapered leading cdne.
2.1.2 Probe—Pyrcx» (;lass with a heating
system capable of maintaining a gas tempera-
ture of 250° F. (U the exit end during
sampling. When temperature or length
limitations are encountered, 310 stainless
steel, or equivalent, may bo used, as approved
by the Administrator.
Environment Reporter
-------
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
487
2.1.3 Pilot tube—Type S. or equivalent,
attached to probo to monitor stack gas
velocity.
2.1.4 Filter holder—Pyrex1 glass with
beating system capable of maintaining any
temperature to a maximum of 225° F.
2.1.5 Implngers—Four Implngers con-
nected In series with glass ball Joint fittings.
The first, third, and fourth Impingers are of
the Greenburg-Smith design, modified by re-
placing the tip with a Vi-lnch m glass tube
extending to ',2-Inch from the bottom of the
flask. The second implnger Is of the Grcen-
burg-Smith design with the standard tip.
2.1.0 Metering system—Vacuum gauge,
leak-free pump, thermometers capable of
...--•asuring temperature to within 5° F., dry
gas meter with 2 percent accuracy, and re-
lated equipment, or equivalent, as required
to maintain an isokineUc sampling rate and
to determine sample volume.
PROBE
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
HEATED AREA FyILTER HOLDER THERMOMETER CHECK
VALVE
VACUUM
LINE
PITOT MANOMETER
ORIFICE
IMPINGERS ICE BATH
BY-PASS VALVE
J/
rtXh-
VACUUM
GAUGE
I. MAIN VALVE
y-
DRY TEST METER
AIR-TIGHT
PUMP
Figure 5-1. Particulatc-sampling train.
2.1.7 Barometer—To measure atmospheric
pressure to ±0.1 in. Hg.
2.2 Sample recovery.
2.2.1 Probe brush—At least as long ag
probe.
2.2.2 Class wash bottles—Two.
2.2.3 Glass sample storage containers.
2.2.4 Graduated cylinder—250 ml.
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 Glass weighing dishes.
2.3.2 Desiccator.
2.3.3 Analytical balance—To measure to
±0.1 ing.
2.3.4 Beakers—250 ml.
1 Trade name.
2.3.5 Separatory funnels—500 ml. and
1,000 ml.
2.3.G Trip balance—300 g. capacity, to
measure to ±0.05 g.
2.3.7 Graduated cylinder—25 ml.
3. Reagents.
3.1 Sampling
3.1.1 Filters—Glass fiber, MSA 1106 BH,
or equivalent, numbered for Identification
and prewclghcd.
3.1.2 Silica gel—Indicating type, 6 to 16
mesh, dried at 175° C. (350° F.)"for 2 hours.
3.1.3 Water—Deionlzed, distilled.
3.1.4 Crushed Ice.
3.2 Sample recovery
3.2.1 Water—Delonized, distilled.
3.2.2 Acetone—Reagent grade.
3.3 Analysis
3.3.1 Water—Dclonteed, distilled.
3.3.2 Chloroform—Reagent grade.
3.3.3 Ethyl ether—Reagent grade.
3.3.4 Desiccant—Drlerlte,1 Indicating.
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 After selecting the sampling site and
the minimum number of sampling points,
determine the stack pressure, temperature,
moisture, and range of velocity head.
4.1.2 Preparation of collection train.
Weigh to the nearest gram approximately
200 g. of silica gel. Label a niter of proper
diameter, desiccate3 for at least 24 hours
and weigh to the nearest 0.5 mg. in a room
where the relative humidity Is less than
50 percent. Place 100 ml. of water in each of
the first two Impingers. leave the third 1m-
plnger empty, and place approximately 200
g. of prcweighed silica gel in the fourth im-
plnger. Save a portion of the water for use
as a blank in the sample analysis. Set up the
train without the probe as in Fitrure 5-1.
Leak check the sampling train at "the sam-
pling site by plugging the inlet to the filter
holder and pulling a 15-in. Hg vacuum. A
leakage rate not in excess of 0.02 c.f.m. at a
vacuum of 15-in. Hg Is acceptable. Attach
the probe and adjust the heater to provide a
gas temperature of about 250° F. at the
probe outlet. Turn on the filter heating sys-
tem. Place crushed Ice around the Impingers.
Add more Ice during the run to keep the tem-
perature of the gases leaving the last im-
plnger at 70° F. or less.
4.1.3 Partlculate train operation. For each
run record the data required on the example
sheet shown In Figure 5-2. Take readings
at each sampling point at least every 5 min-
utes and when significant changes 'in stack
conditions necessitate additional adjust-
ments in flow rate. To begin sampling, po-
sition the nozzle at the first traverse point
.with the tip pointing directly into the gas
stream. Immediately start the pump and aci-
Just the flow to IsokineUc conditions. Main-
tain Isokinetlc sampling throughout the
sampling period. Nomographs are available
which aid In the rapid adjustment of the
sampling rate without other computations.
APTD-057G details the procedure for using
these nomographs. Turn off the pump at the
conclusion of each run and record the final
readings. Remove the probe and nozzle from
the stack and handle in accordance with the
sample recovery process described in section
4.2.
"Dry using Drlerlte' at 70"±10' F.
Copyright £ 1971 by The Bureau of Notional Affairs, Inc.
-------
.488
ENVIRONMENT REPORTER
KANT
IOCATIOM
OPERATOR
DATE i__
RUN.NO.
SAMPLE BOX N0j_
DETER BOX N0._
METER AH,
*i"
C FACTOR
. AMBIENT TEMPERATURJE.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE.
ASSUMED MOISTURE.'.',_
HEATER BOX SETTING
PROBE LENGTH, in.
NOZZLE DIAMETER, in. _
PROBE HEATER SETTING,
SCHEMATIC OF STACK CROSS SECTION
TRAVERSE POINT
NUMBER
-
TOTAL
SAMPLING
TIME
(«). min.
AVERAGE
STATIC
PRESSURE
(P^l. in. Hg.
STACK
TEMPERATURE
|T5).'F
VELOCITY
HEAD
I * PS'.
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
ACROSS
ORIFICE
METER
1 a HI.
in. H20
GAS SAMPLE
VOLUME
(Vm). It3
GAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
AT DRY GAS METER
INLET
ITminl.°F
Avg.
OUTLET
""oui'-'F
Avg.
Awg.
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE.
°F
•
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
"F
Figure 5-2. Paniculate field data.
4.2 Sample recovery. Exercise care In mov-
ing the collection train from the. test site to
tho sample recovery area to minimize the loss
of collected sample or the gain of .extraneous
participate matter. Set aside portions of the
water and acetone used in the sample recov-
ery as blanks for analysis. Place the samples
In containers as follows:
Container No. 1. Remove the filter from its
holder, place in this container, and seal.
Container No. 2. Place loose paniculate
matter and acetone washings from all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces prior to the niter in this
container and seal. Use a razor blade, brush,
or rubber policeman to loosen adhering par-
ticles.
Container No. 3. Measure the volume of
water from the first three impingers and
place the water in this container. Place water
rinsings of all sample-exposed surfaces be-
tween the filter and fourth impinger in tills
container prior to sealing.
Container No. 4. Transfer the silica gel
from the fourth impinger to the original
container and seal. Use a rubber policeman
as an aid In removing silica gel from the
impinger.
Container No. 5. Thoroughly rinse all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces between the filter and
fourth Impinger with acetone, place the
washings in this container, and seal.
4.3 Analysis. Record the data-required on
the example sheet shown In Figure 5-3.
Handle each sample container as follows:
Container No. 1. Transfer the filter and any
loose paniculate matter from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish, des-
slcate, and dry to a constant weight. Report
results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 2. Transfer the acetone
washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pres-
sure. Dessicate and dry to a constant weight.
Report results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 3. Extract organic paniculate
from the Impinger solution with three 25 ml.
portions of chloroform. Complete the ex-
traction with three 25 ml. portions of ethyl
ether. Combine the ether and chloroform ex-
tracts, transfer to a taj-cd beaker and evapo-
rate at 70° F. until nn solvent remains. Des-
sicate, dry to a constant weight, and report
the results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Evaporate the rr-.-maining
wator portion at 2l2°Fo
Dessicato the residue, dry
to a constant weight, and
report the results to the
nearest 0<>5 rog°
Container Noo 4o Weigh the
spent silica gel and report
to the nearest gram.
Environment Reporter
-------
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
489
PLANT.
DATE
RUN N0._
CONTAINER
NUMBER
1
2
3a«
3b'»
5
TOTAl
WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE COLLECTED,
mg
FINAL \VEIGHT
Z^x^I.
TARE WEIGHT
z^xci
WEIGHT GAIN
*3a - ORGANIC EXTRACT FRACTION.
*'3b • RESIDUAL WATER FRACTION.
FINAL
INITIAL
LIQUID COLLECTED
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
VOLUME OF LIQUID
WATER COLLECTED
IMPINGER
VOLUME,
ml
SILICA GEL
WEIGHT,
g
9* ml
•CONVERT WEIGHT OF WATER TO VOLUME BY DIVIDING TOTAL WEIGHT
INCREASE BY DENSITY OF WATER. (1 g/ml):
g
g/ml)
= VOLUME WATER, ml
Figure 5-3. Analytical data.
Container No. 5. Transfer the acetone
washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
dryncss at, nmbicnt temperature and pres-
sure. Desiccate, dry to a constant weight, and
report the results, to the nearest 0.5 jng.
5. Calibration.
Use stand.ird methods and equipment ap-
proved by the Administrator to calibrate
the orllice meter, pilot tube, dry gas meter,
and probe heater.
C. Calculations.
0.1 Sample concentration method.
6.1.1 Average dry gas meter temperature.
See data sheet (Figure 5-2).
C.1.2 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample
volume measured by the dry gr\s meter to
standard conditions (70° P., 29.92 in. HE) by
using Equation 5-1.
where:
Vm,w=Volume of gas sample through the
dry gas meter (standard condi-
tions), cu. ft.
Vm=Volumc of gas sample through the
dry gas meter (meter conditions) ,
cu. ft.
T,M=:Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530 °R.
Tm = Avernge dry gas meter temperatxire,
°R.
PH,= Barometric pressure nt the orifice
meter, In. Hg.
AH=Pressure drop across the orifice
meter, In H.O.
13.6=Spcclfic gravity of mercury.
P.ta= Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions, 29.92 In. Hg.
6.1.3 Volume of Water vapor.
v -
"•ld~
(0.
.0474
equation 5-2
where:
Vw,(d=Volume of water vapor In the gas
sample (standard conditions) , cu.
ft.
Vic=Total volume of liquid collected In
Implngers and silica gel (see Fig-
ure 5-3) , ml.
pnao=Denslty of water, 1 g./ml.
Mn.,o = Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib./lb.
mole.
R=Ideal gas constant, 21.83 In Hg-cu.
ft./lb. mole-°R.
T.,j = Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530" R.
P,(d:= Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions. 29.92 In. Hg.
6.1.4 Total gas volume.
where:
v
equation 5-3
«ot.i— Total volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions) , cu. ft.
Vmild=: Volume of gas through dry gas
meter (standard conditions), cvi.
ft
V«-,ld— Volume of water vapor In the gas
sample (standard conditions) , cu.
ft.
0.1.5 Total participate weight. Determine
the total partlculatc catch from the sum of
the weights on the analysis data sheet (Fig-
ure 5-3).
6.1.6 Concentration.
c.'=(o.
015-l-t-- rf-~
ing
cquation .">—i
where:
V =v -'•'•'•
'"'"•' Vl"VTm
17.71
—'M(v
in."]lB/°'
mr»
equation 5-1
c'i = Concentratlon of partlculatc matter
In stack gas (Sample Concentra-
tion Method), gr./s.c.f.
Mn=Total amount of partlculate mat-
ter collected, mg.
V,oU1=:Total volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions), cu. ft.
6.2 Ratio of area method.
C.2.1 Slack Ras velocity. Collect the neces-
sary data ns detailed In Method 2. Correct the
Copyright C 1971 by The Bureau of Notional Affairs, Inc.
-------
s-cack gas velocity to standard conditions
(29.92 in. Kg. 530'' R.) as follows:
a
•° y..*-1
_
in. Ji
-
T. / equation 5-5
"3
^ where:
I1"1 V.,,d = Stack gas velocity at standarc". con-
ditions, ft./sec.
u
Mn A,
. _M._ 9 A
V.=Stack gas velocity calculated by
Method 2, Equation 2-2, ft./sec.
P.=Absolute stack gas pressure. In. Hg.
P. ti=Absolute pressure at standard con-
tions. 29.92 In. Hg.
T,,,,=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions. 530° R.
T. = Ab-;o!ute stuck gas temperature
(average), '-R.
6.2.2 Concentration.
m
3
T>
O
where:
Ci = Concentration of paniculate matter
in the stack gas (Ratio of Area
Method), gr./s.c.f.
M.=Particulate mass flow rate through
the stack (standard conditions),
mass/time.
Q.=Vo!umetrlc now rate of gas stream
through the stack (standard con-
ditions) . volume/time.
Mn = Total amount of partlculate matter
collected by train, mg.
6 = Total sampling time, mln.
Ai = Cross-sectional area of stack, sq. ft.
Ar, = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, sq. ft.
V.^rrStack gas velocity at standard con-
ditions, ft. /sec.
6.3 Isokinetlc variation.
X100 =
c'. = Concentration of partlculate matter
In the stack gas (Sample Concentra-
tion Method), gr./s.c.f.
7. References.
Addendum to Specifications for Incinerator
Testing at Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPC.
Dec. 6, 1967.
Martin. Robert M. Construction Details of
Isokinetlc Source Sampling Equipment. En-
vironmental Protection Agency, APTD-0581.
Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration,
and Operation of Isokinetlc Source Sampling
Equipment. Environmental Protection
Agency. APTD-O576.
Smith, W. 'S.; R. T. Shlgehara, and W. F.
Todd. A Method of Interpreting Stack Sam-
pling Data. Paper prc.sp.nlcd at the 6:!d
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association, St. Louis. June 14-19. 1U70.
Smith. W. S.. i:-t al. Stack Gas Sampling Im-
proved sind Slmplilied with New Equipment.
APCA Paper No. 67-119. 19G7.
Specifications for Incinerator Testing at
Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPC. 1907.
METHOD 6—DETERMINATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOUP.CES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. A gas sample Is extracted
from the sampling point In the stack, and
the acid mist' Including sulfur trioxide Is
separated from the sulfur dioxide. The sulfur
dioxide fraction Is measured by the barluin-
thorln tltratlon method.
1.2 Applicability. This method Is appllca-
flV.P.A.
where:
I = Percent of isokinetlc sampling.
Ct = Concentration of particulate matter
In the stack gas (Ratio of-Area
Method), gr./s.c.f.
C ; =Concentration of particulate matter
in the stack gas (Sample Concen-
tration Method), gr./s.c.f.
Vic = Total volume of liquid collected In
impingers and silica gel (see Fig-
ure 5-3) .ml.
CM '< = Den.si-.y of water. 1 g./ml.
R = Iolea! gas constant. 21.83 in. Hg-cu.
ft./lb. mole-' R.
MM_.o=Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib./lb.
mole.
Vm = Volume of gas sample thro\:gh the
dry gas meter (meter conditions),
cu. ft.
Tm = Absolute average dry gas meter tem-
perature (see Figure 5-2). "R.
Pl,.t=Baromotric pressure at sampling
site, in Hg.
AH=Aver:ige pressure drop across the ori-
fice (see Figure 5-2). in HSO.
T. = Abso!ute average stack ga.i tempera-
ture (see Figure 5-2), 'R.
equation 5—7
6 — Total sampling time, mln.
V. = Stack gas velocity calculated by
Method 2, Equation 2-2, ft./sec.
P. = Absolute stack gas pressure, In. Hg.
An = Cross-sectional area of nozzle, sq. ft.
6.4 Acceptable results. The following
range sets the limit on acceptable Isoklnetio
sampling results:
If 82 percent glass, approximately
5-6 nun. ID, with a heating system to prevent
condensation and a filter to remove partlcu-
late matter Including sulfurlc acid mist.
2.1.2 Midget bubbler—One, with glass
wool packed iu top to prevent sulfurlc acid
mi.st carryover.
2.1.3 Glass wool.
2.1.4 Midget Impingers—Three.
2.1.5 Drying tube—Packed with 6 to 16
mesh Inciicatlng-type silica gel or equiva-
lent, to dry the sample.
2.1.6 Pump—Leak-free, vacuum type.
2.1.7 Rate meter—Rotameter, or equiva-
lent, to measure a 0-10 s.c.f.h. flow range
2.1.8 Dry gas meter—Sufficiently accurate
to measure the sample volume within 1
percent.
2.1.9 Pilot tube—Type ^. or equivalent,
necessary only if a sample traverse Is re-
quired or If stack gas velocity varies with
time.
2.2 Sample recovery.
2.2.1 Glass wash bottles—Tv/o.
2.2.2 Polyethylene storage bottles—To
store Impingcr samples.
2.3 Analysis.
1 Trade name.
PROBE (END PACKED
WITH QUARTZ OR
PYREX WOOL)
STACK WALL
MIDGET BUBBLER MIDGET IMPINGERS'
GLASS WOOL
SILICA GEL DRYING TUBE
V-
/
TYPE S PITOT TUBE
/
PITOT MANOMETER
DRY GAS METER ROTAMETER
Figure 6-1. S02 sampling train.
m
•z.
<
3!
O
•z.
H
3)
m
-o
O
33
m
33
-------
RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES FOR BERYLLIUM
Sample No.
37
38
39
40
41
42
42A
43
44
45
46
47
48
48A
49
50
51
52
53
54
54A
55
56
57
58
59
60
60A
61
62
63
64
65
66
66A
69
70
Code
Be-SI-N-1-G
Be-SI-N-1-G-F
Be-SI-N-1-G-I
Be-SI-N-1-MP-P
Be-SI-N-1-MP-F
Be-SI-N-1-MP-I
Be-SI-N-1-GB
Be-SI-N-2-G-P
Be-SI-N-2-G-F
Be-SI-N-2-G-I
Be-SI-N-2-MP-P
Be-SI-N-2-MP-F
Be-SI-N-2-MP-I
Be-SI-N-2-GB
Be-SI-M-1-G-P
Be-SI-M-1-G-F
Be-SI-M-1-G-I
Be-SI-M-1-MP-P
Be-SI-M-1-MP-F
Be-SI-M-1-MP-I
Be-SI-M-GB
Be-SI-S-1-G-P
Be-SI-S-1-G-F
Be-SI-S-l-G~I
Be-SI-S-1-MP-P
Be-SI-S-1-MP-F
Be-SI-S-1-MP-I
Be-SI-S-1-GB
Be-SI-S-2-G-P
Be-SI-S-2-G-F
Be-SI-S-2-G-I
Be-SI-S-2-MP-P
Be-SI-S-2-MP-F
Be-SI-S-2-MP-I
Be-SI-S-2-GB
Be-SI-G-Blank
Be-SI-MP-Blank
yg Be *Total yg Be
3.13~\
0.15 V * H.23N
7.95 J L **
0.45"^ f
0.30 1 * 13 80 J
12.50 f I<3>OU J
0.55J
3.05^ _n^
0.30 \ * 3.70^
0.35 J I **
0.00^ {
0.00 L * 1>90 J
1.90 (
0.00 J
°-60 ^ i A* -^
0.00 \ * K45^
0.85 J > **
0.20S
0.05 1 * 1.30 J
0.90 f
0.15J
1 .68 S _ c~
0.25 (• * 7.53^\
5.60J / ^
0.95"N [
^'QQ > * 12 50 }
10.00 f l*'w
0.55J
0.55-^
0.00 > * 1-65-N
1-ioJ L **
I \
0.45 J- * 5.80 )
0.95
3.30J
0.40
0.15
* Total yg Be per run
** Denotes that the two particulate runs were accomplished at the same time, in the
same stack with a separate probe (two probes total) for each run.
-31-
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Name
Title
John Koogler, Ph.D., P.E.
John Dollar, E.I.T., MS
Ray Black, B.S.
Joe Yarborough, B.S.
Robert Durgan, Tech.
Project Director
Project Manager
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
-32-
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant.
Sampling Location.
Dato «g"" /O ~
Time Starts/a:.
Sampling Time/Point
Moisture
Barcmotric Press
Weather
Temp.
Samplo Box Ho.
Dansity Factor,
Stack Press.
_"Hg
LUW/D —. . W/S
., Meter Box No
Meter A H§
Nozslo Dia.
Pitot Corr. Factor
_in.f Proba Length.
ft
Probe Heater Setting " "*
Stack Dimensionsi Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height He&i
lift
ar _J*** ,
on%5<4
__i°
_ft2
ft
Sketch Of Stack i
Mat*l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading.
Initial Gas Meter Reading.
Total Condensate In Impingers_
Moisture In Silica Gel.2S&O- 237. ^ *"
Silica Gel Container Mo. / .Filtor No.
Orsati C02 <
°2
CO
.ft3
ml
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted Byi
Remarks t
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas >feter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H?0).
Calc. victual
Stack Gas
Temperature
CT)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Motor
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
(F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(F)
Vacuum On
s'ajnple Train
("Hg)
no
10
0:
1L2L.
112^.
11
ILL
116
III
Uk
7t
ILL.
4.3.0
/AT"
-------
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Or Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Cft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Motor
Orifice
Press .Diff.
Calco
Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Sample
Box
Temp»
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
( F) .
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
T"
luO
- /a
jL
(&SL
*•? s&3
_v.J/^_."
v
¥1
ir
j&
xb
* -8
t*
91
2*1.
5/
it
,_A
•11%
"T"
2,
7'
3-8
dh!
(r>3
il^
//•^
. 0
3.$-
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling^Location_
Date TV
Kun No«-
Timo Start
Time End
Sampling Time/Point ^"2,
DB /I£PF. WD*7<£_0F. I
Moisture /» ff7^.FDAC?..ff/J?Gas Density Factor —
VF 3 DP
"Hg
Barometric Press ^7*
Hf'
Stack Press.
Weather
Temp..
\ W/D_
Sample Box
Meter A Ha
- . W/S —
Meter Box No.
Nozzlo Dia.
Pitot Corr. Factor
_in.f Probs Length_
ft
Probe Heater Setting ""**
Stack Dimensions I Inside Diameter [_.
Inside Area
Height
_in
_ft2
9 ft
Sketch Of Stack i
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading:
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate In Impingers
Moisture In Silica Gel
- /2,-
ml
~m
Silica Gel Container No.J3 .Filter No(
Orsati C02 ,
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted Byi
Remarksi
^
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
(••H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
CF)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
(F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(F)
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
-2//O
I-3Q
s*
2
6^0
32
-------
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Motor
Orifice
Press .Diff.
Calc. [Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
CT)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Moter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp e
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
( F)
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
T
3-/0
ii
//
//
1L
I-
'LL3L
215
low
7
rx
\
D
ifl
-------
.SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Time Start
, Time End__
Time/Point /O ff])^ ('Ted'flL~/2bnt/*h
i1, DP&2. °F. VF 3 DP 0..S^9 "Hg
Moisture/* %7%.FDAfl,#/3 .Gas Density Factor;
Barometric PrassCffi'ffi'HK. Stack Press. "Hg
V/eather /nQ/ "- 'HumCt
Tenp.5?7-9^°Ft W/D , V//S
Sample Box Mo. *~" . Meter Box Mo..
Meter A Hg/I fo (9 , Pitot Corr. Factor ^
Nozzle Dia. £>.'2^> in.. Probe I.-e-i[:th_
/rcbe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensionsi Inside Diameter JJL in
Inside Area ^>. ~~?%^ ft^
Height A/ert \f>r*-f-
-------
Port .And
Traverse
Point Ho.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff •
("H20.).
Stack Gas
Temperature
CT)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Motor
Sample
Box
Temp.
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
( F)
Vacuxim On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location,
Date &~ /&—"7/
•*SraCN.
Uun No.
Time Start
4-
Time End
Sampling Time/Point,
D3
'F, WB_
_°F, DP °F, VF 3 DP
Moisture ^.FDA ,Gas Density Factor.
B-iromotric Pressv^fl^'^R. Stack Press.
V/eather
"Hg
"Hf*
Temp. ?7-93^F. W/D W/S
Sanple DDK Mo. ~ . Meter Box No. £ E- '3!—'
J- *
...fo?X Pitot Corr. Factor Q
Nozzlo Dia.
_in., Probe Length_
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensionsi Inside Diameter
\ t.
Inside Area
Height
'78
ft
in
ft2
ZLft
Sketch Of Stack i
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading_
S*2l.. /*7
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate In Impingers <£X <
Moisture In Silica Gel^Zl^-
Silica Gel Container No. &,. .
Orsatt CO;
°2
CO
ft>
rt^
_ml
_gra
Filter No. J2-
N2 '
Excess
Air
Test Conducted Byi
fQ
Remarks i
A&vo HlT-frr
Port And
Traverse
Point No
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. <§ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
(F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(F)
Vacuum On
i Train
( " Hg)
m
. coo
T&
6*13
112^
\£
i
ii
\L
U
f/>0
IL6
-------
Tvrt Arxl
Traverse
Point No
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Veloc ity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff .
C'H20)
Calc• Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
CT)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Tempo
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
( F)
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
Ju
Q.ST
JL&
.!_
m
-79
a
Ma
1*L
1-
, 6
/L.
A
6
i.
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location fr\ / O
Date &-))-"}'! _ s Hun No
Time Start
D-
//
Total Condensate In Impingers_
Moisture In Silica Gel^5/.^- 223.0 ~
Silica Gel Container No.^^"".Filter No.
OrsatI C0£
°2
CO
Test Conducted Byi
Remarks I
ft
Port Ani
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Cft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20) .
eter
Orifice
Press.Diff .
C'HpO)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
Out
In
Sample
Box
Temp.
(F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(F)
ft-
ml
gm
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
4^
ts'
.31
i
08- IS
1
O./O
IIS
7*
7
1t3
33
113
B-o
-------
Fort And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
.(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff .
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
CF)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Tempo
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
( F) .
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
n
a.og
1 -
_L_
U
j^L
S.
^
3r jf/y. /
iai
ZM
712
t
-
O-/0
/.
Z^
a
A
A
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant <«7TtJe -PTfC) V^ I VY fO V> M II A" <• ni * J
Sampling Location/i|/°F. VF 3 DP £
t
. /
&S$
/20fcrM
\&4- "HK
MoisturejJi/4p1&.FDA .Gas Density Factor
«\O 9
Barometric Press ^7* 7 "Hg. Stack Press.
VJeather \^
4|A;
7^ i -
- O
-------
Port And
Traverse
Point Ho t
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack .
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff .
ualc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Moter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Tempo
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
( F)
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
2E
ert
"~Z_
[_
7
7.7
'1
3.3~
-23-
au2
79
^33.0
P*Z'ti
f t v^, !^
—\j—yj~
/ TXS*
I • &G
J-%0
&7] 'So
/ZO
96
M,
/ i^r
/ » -a>«=3
/
77
23.
m^
.0'
-a-
'*
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant »»
Sampling Location
Date ?f- /. - "7 7
_, Itun No
Timo Start
Sampling Time/Point,
DB
, Time End^
4@?)t
F. VF
"H
£.FDA<3/?%Gas Density Factor^
BarOIMtrie Press £^.~l"Hg. Stack Press. "Hg
We a ther C^OdST"-
n*\ _
Temp. & Q Jb
Sample DDK Kc
Meter &H9_/,"
-, w/y — .
_, Meter Box Mo
Nozzlo Dia.
Pitot Corr. Factor
_in.f Probe Length_
ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensionsi Inside Diameter
Inside Area
. Height
in
Sketch Of Stacki
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate In Impingers
Moisture In Silica GelJ^33.<3-
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsati C02 , i_
02
CO
ft3
ft3
ml
.Filter No. ^
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted
Remarksi
&
4A
Port \nd
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
Frcm End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter "
Orifice
Press.Diff .
C"H?0).
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. © Dry
Gas Meter
CF)
In Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
(F)
Last
Lmpinger
Temp.
(F)
•
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
7S
. 763
. 0
ux
&&
-4^
^"7^
/XT
1 —
3-5-
3/2.
0-38
Mo
3-3
-------
Fort And
Traverse
Point 'Mo.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
Stack Gas
Temper at ure
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Tempe
( F)
Last.
Impinger
Temp.
(
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
-------
S.T£j5 S/^niSG FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date _ j?—/2r"7/
, Kun No.
Time Start
Sampling Time/Point
Hg
Moist ire- ^.FDA Otf£.Gas Density Factor Q-9?
B-irom-itric Press s3O_"Hg, Stack Press. O? Q "Hg
Weathor ~
Temp. j&\J°F. W#)_ • W/S.
Sample Box No. •rTv-b , Meter Box No._
Meter t l§/*~7<£-, Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Oi-i. y*/ i.r., Probe Length ^ ft
Probe !.;'.c,-ater Setting ^—
Stack Dir.iensions t Inside Diameter /
Inside Area Q* 7£5y
Sketch Of Stack i
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /3l •
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate In Impingers_
Moisture In Silica Gel;
Silica Gel Container Mo.^ .Filter No,
Orsat t C0£
I
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted Byt
Remarks t
r
Height
f t
ft
ml
Port A-xi
Tra-/er;5e
Point -ro
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff.
C'H?0)
Calc• Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Motor
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
(F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(F)
Vacuum Cn
Sample Train
( " Hg)
&£U
/.
T/s
. 0
/..Jo
-, ,„
-------
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) '
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H2Q)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff .
Stack Gas
Temperature
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp*
( F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
C F)
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant ra=.C.Uf£[M !![}-<=>..
Sampling Location ^JO£f// ^fflZtcJ^
Date • 0^" ///"^ "7 f . Hun No. /
Timo Start /3^ "2* . Tinie End 14^4-2*
Sampline Time/Point }t> fffil*. CTBr& fa f '2&J
Da£§fc>°F. Vra^2-°F. DP^<^°F. VF Q DPd>.6-6
Moisture^.^ l^.FDA ty£ .Gas Density FactorO-
Earomotrio Press
-------
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Hetor
Reading
Cft3)
Stack .
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Metcr
Orifice
Press.Diff .
Actual
Stack Gas
Temperature
CT)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp»
( F)
Last
Iinpinger
Temp.
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
_.
Mi
^£«
j.&o-
/XT'
z
£
Bo
/.So
/.*)*
0
9:
_fj.
4*
• 2*-
^L
fe.o
(
/•<> K
-fJ
n.
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling L
Date &-
Timo Start
ocation ^=5O\Jn"Vi ^p>Vf^ On**-
- I'Z.-'-?! . llun No. Z-
CT#.JL3 . Time End
Sampling Time/Point lO AMU~ TOt&L |'5°F. W?D ' — . W/S '"~
No.
Meter Box No.5T£n._^L2«
tb&, Pitot Corr. Factor O. R^
. V4 ir
A^J
er Setting
nsionsi In:
In:
He:
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in)
i.f Probs
side Diai
;ide Are
Leht
3 Length ft
neter ) *rLr- in
a f t2
ft
Clock
Time
0833
a $38
rt&&3
&%<£$
o$A3
Q&J$BL
&3Q3
Ofy%
&q 13
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
_5b.. 7?^
53.8
£&>.&
&£). £>
6>3 ~£T
f *7 u»
7/.5"
7-^- ^"
13 -4-
Sketch Of Stack
- .(( .
t
^
x
_>/
\
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
a*?
&.<£$
&>36>
f^.3^
O.&3
b. 7^4 ft3
s ^2. ml
*-Z23.0~ /2.m
,Filtei
r No.
Test Conducted By i YAfcfiRO/l&ll
Remarks t
.\M*t^ ^il
V
•-K f^ediA\U& '^A \k\vJJY\Q
^ N
Stack Gas
Temperature
i
f/4:
ji^L
ml.
/ /t£-.
ii y^
i /L[-
/jt£
//
<3 . £ ^
^^
3. £
J*>.&~
j
-------
Port And
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From End
Of Port
(in) .
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Cft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
("H^
>i—.-..•r.>Lj
Stack Gas
Temperature
CF)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
Vacuum On
Sample Train
( " Hg)
------- |