TEST NO. 71 - CI - 37
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE
BARTOW, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 16 - 20, 1971
innmn'itlul I'tifjinwrinij. im:
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
TEST NO. 71 - CI - 37
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE
BARTOW, FLORIDA
DECEMBER 16 - 20, 1971-
Tests Conducted by:
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Contract # CPA - 70 - 82
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures II
List of Tables III
Introduction 1
Summary of Results 1
Process Description 17
Process Operation 17
Location of Sampling Points 19
Sampling and Analytical Procedures 27
Appendix 34
A. Emission Calculations and Results
B. Field Data
C. Standard Analytical Procedures
D. Laboratory Results
E. Project Participants
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
I. Flow Diagram and Sampling 4
II. Port Location - Station K 21
III. Port Location - Station L 22
IV. Port Location - Station M 23
V. Port Location - Station N 24
VI. Port Location - Station P 25
VII. Port Location - Station R 26
VIII. Moisture Sampling Train 31
IX. Fluoride Sampling Train 32
X. Ammonia Sampling Train 33
II
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
I. Summary of Fluoride Results - Station K 5
II. Summary of Fluoride Results - Station L 6
III. Summary of Fluoride Results - Station M 7
IV. Summary of Fluoride Results - Station N 8
V. Summary of Fluoride Results - Station P 9
VI. Summary of Fluoride Results - Station R 1°
VII. Summary of Ammonia Results - Station K ^
VIII. Summary of Ammonia Results - Station L ^
IX. Summary of Ammonia Results - Station M ^
X. Summary of Ammonia Results - Station N ^
XI. Summary of Ammonia Results - Station P ^5
XII. Summary of Ammonia Results - Station R '6
XIII. Sampling Points 20
III
-------
INTRODUCTION
Under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Engineering, Inc. conducted emission tests at the
C. F. Chemicals, Inc. diamrnonium phosphate plant number three located
in Bartow, Florida. Three test runs were conducted on December
16 - 20, 1971. The purpose of the tests was to obtain data for the
use of both the Industrial Studies Branch and the Performance Standards
Branch of the EPA.
Using separate sample trains, measurements were made for both
total fluorides and ammonia in the inlet and outlet ducts of the
reactor, cooler, and dryer scrubbers. Grab samples of the scrubbing
liquids, the process reactants, and the process products were taken
and analyzed for fluoride and P^Or content. A schematic flow diagram
of all the sampling locations is given in Figure I.
Pertinent results of the tests are listed in Tables I - XII:
complete test results are given in Appendix A.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The plant operated under normal process conditions during the
three test runs. However, two minor irregularities occurred in the
sampling. During the third run at Station "L", the probe became plug-
ged with solid material and the nozzle had to be removed and cleaned
before the test could be continued. Secondly, at Station "M", nega-
tive flow occurred at the first three traverse points and these points
were therefore skipped during the sample runs. In determining total
stack gas flow rates, a value of zero velocity was used for these nega-
tive points.
-------
A few irregularities in the test data need to be noted. For run
number tv/o the total fluoride concentration measured at the reactor
scrubber outlet is greater than the fluoride concentration at the inlet
(see Tables I and VI). Like vn'se, for both runs number two and three
the ammonia concentrations measured at the cooler scrubber outlet are
higher than the concentrations at the scrubber inlet (see Tables X and
2
-------
XI). With the exception that perhaps some of these samples were contaminated,
no explanation for these anomalies has been confirmed. For a complete summary
of the stack conditions and emission levels for each test run refer to Tables
I - XII.
-------
/>:"">i p
; .|- Lt
PHOSPHORIC
ACID
(Q)
PRODUCT
j 1 \,\
( ) GRAB SAMPLE
LIQUID LIQUID
ATMOSPI ERE
V
)NIA
REACTOR
I
•GRAriUL
i
AW
p
DRYER
^
SIZI
ANT
GRINDI
t
NG
)
NG
i
COOLER
(
™
— £
— E>
— 6*
j.i\
REACTOR
SCRUBBER
NO, 1
LIQUID
OUT
CYCLONE
CYCLONE
CYCLONE
(
D
— o
I
/-r\
Ll
liN
REACTOR
SCRU3BER
NO, 2
(D) LIQUII
H> OUT
JQUID
IN
|CE)
DRYER
CfDI IPDCTD
oLKuDDtK
QUID /-_ \
IN 1 V- ) LI
<^™*Sv 1 V
N! (G)
^H i
COOLER
SCRUBBER
| (H)
LIQUID
OUT
FIGURE 1
SCIEMATIC LOCATION'S OF SAMPLING STATIONS,
DIANMONIUM PHOSPHATE PLANT NO. 3, C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
* These points could not be sampled because of plugging problems
4
-------
TABLE 1
SUfvlARY OF RESULTS
FLUOPJMiS
STATION "K" SECOND STAGE
REACTOR SCRUBBER OUTLET
Run Mo.
Date
Barometric pressure, incites Kg
Si1. -.ck pressure, inches Kg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
i
Stack gas flov/ rate G> S.T.P., SCFI-i
Vol. dry gas Q S.T.P.", SCF
Fluoride, v:ater soluble, ir.g
Fluoride, total , ing
Fluoride, v/ater soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fl'.'oride, v.'atcr soluble, Ib/ton P.,0,. Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P00r Fed.
:_ I)
Second Stage Scrubber Efficiency, %
1
12-16-71
30
29
22.6
164
23066
104.233
67
67067
0.0095
0.0096
0.0061
0.0061
1.88
1.90
0.06
0.07
44.3
2
1P-1R-71
30
29
27
169
33660
133.2
147
147.77.
0.0169
0.017
0.0101
0.0101
4.87
4.90
0.19
0.20
— ..-
3
1?-?0-71
30
29
i
23.6
170
21940
102.895
57
i
64.3
0.0084
n.nnQR
0.0052
0.0059
1.58
1.78
n,nfi
0.07
82.3
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RF.SULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "L" DRYER
SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas 0 S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, ing
i '
Fluoride, total > ing
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. concl.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, To/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P20r. Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P00r Fed.
(- v)
Scrubber. efficiency, %
1
12-16-71
sn
. 30
19.5
160
30655
85.228
154
?lfi
0.0252
0.0354
0.0174
0.0244
6.62
9.29
0.23
0.32
-
..._
2
12-18-71
30
3D
10.4
150
36625
88.388
91
141
0.0-149
0.0231
0.0116
0.018
4.68
7.25
0.19
p. 29
3
JL£=20_ril
30
30
9
151
34855
.8.1.827
22.6
37.9
0.004
0.0056
0.0031
0.0052
1.18
1.98
0.05
0.08
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 3
SURARY Oc RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "M" DRYER
SCRUBBER OUTLET
Run Ko.
Dote
Baroiiiatric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Slack gas moisture, % vclurne
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P.", SCF
Fluoride, v.'ater soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , ing
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P?0r> Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
12-16-71
30
28.1
11.7
132
39130
80.528
2.4
2.466
0.0004
0.0005
0.0003
0.0003
0.15
0.15
0.005
0.005
98.4
2
12-18-71
30
28.1
11.7
111
36103
80.301
8.1
8.42
0,-0015
0.0016
0.0012
0.0012
0.48
0.51
0.019
0.020
93.0
3
12-20-71
30
28.2
14.3
m
31979
79.294
1.2
1.41
0.0002
0.0003
0.0002
0.0002
0.07
o.oa
0.003
0.003
96.0
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
Station "N" Cooler
Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date '
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P.", SCF
Fluoride, v/ater soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , nig
Fluoride, v/ater soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Fluoride, total, 'Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
12-16-71
30.
29.71
2.6
121
36019
75.538
. 34
64.2
0V0065
0.0123
0.0055
0.0105
2.00
3.74
0.07
0.13
2
12-18-71
30
29.71
2.1
121
34373
74JJ57 _
25
43.5
0.0052
0.009
0.0044
0.0077
1.52
2.65
0.06
0.11
3
12-20-71
30
29,71
2.R
121
41447
84.862
31
i
0.0055
0.0086
0.0047
0.0074
1.96
3.07
0.08
0.12
Dry, 70°F.} 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 5
SUMMARY Or- fJHSULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "P" COOLER
SCRUBBER OUTLET
Run Mo.
Date '
Barometric pressure, inches l-ig
Stack pressure, Inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate Q S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P.", SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
i
Fluoride., total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, v.'ater soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, "Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0. Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P^O,. Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
12-16-71
30
28.7
11.4
124
46921
83.789
2.8
2.8
0.0005
0.0005
0.0004
0.0004
0.19
0.19
0.007
0.007
95.0
2
12-18-71
30
28.7
9.5
100
52423
99.759
4.6
•• • • • •
4.671
Q-.0007
0.0007
0.0006
0.0006
0.30
0.31
0.012
0.012
88.3
•}
12-20-71
30
28.7
7.5
95
60675
114.24
2.7
j
2.751
0.0003
0.0003
0.0003
0.0003
0.18
0.18
0.007
0.007
94.1
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TADLF. 6
SUMMARY r-i- i^SULTS
FLUOKI131L3
- STATION ." R" SECOND STAGE
... REACTOR SCRMRRFR INLET
Run Mo.
Date '
Barometric pressure, inches llg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, « volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate Q S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, nig
Fluoride, total , nig
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
•Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, To/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P00r Fed.
c. \j
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
12-16-71
30
29
29
171
19812
120.332
143
,-, -i
164.4
0.0175
0,0201
0.0101
0.0116
2.96
3.41
0.10
0.12
?
12-18-71
3_d_._
29
30.2
171
19019
91.427
71
91.3
0-.012
0.0154
0.0068
0.0088
1.96
2.51
0.08
0.10
3
12-20-71
30
29
32.5
173
17R4n
84.318
319 ....
i
373
0.0571
0.0667
0.0312
0.0365
8.58
10.03
0.34
0.40
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches llg.
10
-------
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
A!-7iONIA
STATION "K" SECOND STAGE
Reactor Scrubber Outlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate G> S.T.P. SCFM.
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Ammonia, mg
l\. -,.».-..* 4 ~ «,^/COP
niiiiiiun i u , y i / oLi
Ammonia, gr/CF
Ammonia, Ibs/hour
Ammonia Ib/ton NH^ fed
Scrubber efficiency - %, Second Stagi
1
12-16-71
30
29
22.6
164
23066
3.133
1.3
0.006
0.004
1.26
0.27
97.6
2
12-18-71
30
29
27
170
33660
3.033
1.8
0.009
0.005
2.64
0.24
99.7
3
12-20-71
30
29
23.6
170
21940
2.854
0.3
0.002
0.001
. 0.30
0.03
99.9
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
11
-------
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
AMMONIA
STATION "L"
Dryer Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Ha
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P. SCFM.
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P.*, SCF
Ammonia, mg
AffliTiOiTi 3 , yi"/ SCF
Ammonia, gr/CF
Ammonia, Ibs/hour
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Scrubber efficiency - %
1
12-16-71
30
29.7
19.5
160
30655
2.731
170.5
0.96
0.65
252.6
54.9
2
12-18-71
30
29.7
10.4
150
36625
2.826
126.7
0.69
0.53
216.7
19.3
3
12-20-71
30
29.7
9
151
34855
2.758
160.3
0.89
0.70
267.4
25.7
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
12
-------
TABLE 9
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
AMMONIA
STATION "M"
Dryer Scrubbrr Outlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
S*ack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P. SCFM.
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Ammonia, mg
Ar.i,nonia, gr/SCF
Ammonia, gr/CF
Ammonia, Ibs/hour
Ammonia Ib/ton NH, fed
Scrubber efficiency - %
1
12-16-71
30
28.1
11.7
132
39130
3.049
0.04
0.0002
0.0001
0.07
-
0.015
99.9
2
12-18-71
30
28.1
11.7
111
36103
3.103
2
0.0099
0.0076
3.07
0.274
98.6
3
12-20-71
30
28.1
14.3
111
31979
2.950
1
0.0052
0.0039
1.43
_
0.138
99.5
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
13
-------
TABLE 10
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
AMMONIA
STATION "N"
Cooler Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P. SCFM.
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Ammonia, mg
fi~_ -.,-•, „ ^, t err
nliiiiioiil Q , y i / Ooi
Ammonia, gr/CF
Ammonia, Ibs/hour
Ammonia Ib/ton NHL fed
Scrubber efficiency - %
1
12-16-71
30
29.7
2.6
140
36019
2.812
23.2
0.13
0.108
39.2
8.5
2
12-18-71
30
29.7
2.1
140
34373
3.519
0.05
0.0002
0.0002
0.06
0.006
3
12-20-71
30
29.7
2.5
140
41447
3.027
0.1
0.0005
0.0004
0.18
0.017
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
14
-------
TABLE 11
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
AMMONIA
STATION "P"
Cooler'Scrubber Outlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture.. % \olume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P. SCFM.
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia, gr/SCF
Ammonia, gr/CF
Ammonia, Ibs/hour
.
Ammonia Ib/ton NH, fed
Scrubber efficiency - %
1
12-16-71
30
28.7
11.4
124
46921
3.179
1.6
0.008
0.006
3.1
0.68
98.7
2
12-18-71
30
28.7
9.5
100
52423
3.773
1
0.004
0.003
1.8
0.16
3
12-20-21
30
28.7
7.5
95
60675
3.557
0.2
0.0009
0.0007
0.4
0.04
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
15
-------
TABLE 12
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
AMMONIA
"STATION -"R" SECOND STAGE
Reactor Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
A-'erage stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P. SCFM.
Vol. dry gas § S.T.P. , SCF
Ammonia, mg
Ar.,TOnia, gr/SCF
Ammonia, gr/CF
Ammonia, Ibs/hour
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Scrubber efficiency - %
1
12-16-71
30
29
29
174
19812
2.857
57.9
0.31
0.18
53
4.6
11.5
2
12-18-71
30
29
30.2
171
19019
3.443
1-267.9
5.6
3.2
924
11.2
82.5
3
12-20-71
30
29
32.5
173
17540
2.667
257.4
1.5
0.8
223
10.4
21.5
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
16
-------
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The process consists of a preneutralizer for ammoniation
of wet-process phosphoric acid, an ammoniator-granulator, and
accessory equipment for drying, cooling, and screening the product.
The primary reaction is as follows:
2 NH + HP0 •*• (NH) HP0
4
Unabsorbed ammonia gas flows out with exhaust gases; however,
most of this ammonia is returned to the process by means of a
scrubbing system using weak phosphoric acid as the scrubbing medium.
The scrubber acid is mixed with 54 percent P^Og acid (from the
wet-acid plant) in the preneutralizer resulting in a solution usually
averaging about 39 percent P2°5-
The DAP slurry 1s pumped from the reactor to the granulator
where additional ammonia is added along with recycled product to
form a solid material averaging 18 percent N and 46 percent Pp^c*
Then it is dried, cooled, and screened before being conveyed to
storage.
PROCESS OPERATION
Run #1 was conducted on December 16, 1971, from 4:20 to 6:20 p.m.
Process operation was normal for the duration of the run. Before
the start of Run #2 the next morning, the 30% P205 acid line to
17
• r
-------
the scrubbers plugged forcing the plant to switch to 54% PpOr makeup
acid. This change altered the strength of the scrubbing acid which
constituted an abnormal condition. Testing had to be postponed
until the 30% P205 line could be reopened.
At 9:35 a.m. on the morning of the 18th, the test crew had just
begun Run #2 when a power failure shut the plant down. The plant
started up again at 9:50 a.m.; only to shut down again at 10:30 a.m.
when a slurry pump plugged. At 12:40 p.m. the unit started up
again and continued to run without difficulty for the rest of the
day. Run #2 was conducted under normal process conditions from
1:45 p.m. to 3:45 p.m.
Plant operating problems were also experienced on the next
morning. A vibration problem with the ammoniator and screen fans
caused a shutdown at 7:55 a.m. Dust buildup on the fan blades was
removed by sandblasting and the plant, started up again at 11:30 a.m.
After the plant had been in operation a short time, the duct from
the reactor to the scrubber plugged causing excessive ammonia fumes
from the reactor to be leaked into the area. The plant was started
up again at 5:30 p.m. High pH and decreasing specific gravities
were observed on both scrubber acid sumps just prior to the start
of Run #3 at 6:05 p.m. However, the plant operator indicated that
this condition would be quickly stabilized. Other than some minor
adjustments to the ammonia feed rate, process operation remained
normal throughout Run #3 which was concluded at 8:30 p.m.
18
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling sites and number of traverse points were selected
as per "Method I-Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary
Sources, Part 60, Subchapter C, Chapter 1, Title 40," Federal Register,
No. 247-Pt. II-l.
The above method suggests using two perpendicular diameters
of traverse points per sampling station, however, on-site conditions
necessitated the use of only one traverse diameter in all cases. The
suggested number of traverse points per diameter was used where possible
without sampling within one inch of the inner wall.
Figures 2 through 7 are schematic diagrams of the stack con-
figuration near the sampling location, and the sampling points traversed
during the emission tests.
19
-------
TABLE 13
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING POINTS
r\>
o
Sampling Point
Description
Sampling Point
Identification
Actual Number
of Traverse Points
Stack
Diameter(ft.)
Reactor Scrubber Outlet
Dryer Scrubber Inlet
Dryer Scrubber Outlet
Cooler Scrubber Inlet
Cooler Scrubber Outlet
Reactor Scrubber Inlet
K
L
M
N
P
R
10
16
20
22
18
22
3.5
4.5
4.6
5.0
5.0
3.1
-------
INNER STACK DIA. = 42 in.
SAMPLING PORT
FAN
Sampling
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Distance From
Inner Wall
(in.)
2 7/8
4 7/8
7 3/8
10 1/2
14 7/8
27
31 1/2
34 5/8
37
39 1/4
FIGURE 2
LOCATION OF PORT AND SAMPLING POINTS, STATION K
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
21
-------
INNER STACK DIAMETER = 54 in.
Sampling Port
Sampling
Point
Distance From
Inner Wall (in)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
2 3/8
4
5 7/8
7 7/8
10 1/8
12 3/4
16
20 5/8
33 3/8
38
41 1/4
43 7/8
46 1/8
48 1/8
50
51 5/8
FIGURE 3
LOCATION OF PORT AND SAMPLING POINTS,
STATION L
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
22
-------
INNER STACK DIAMETER = 56 in.
42 V
Sampling Port
/
FAN
Sampling
Point
Distance From
Inner Wall (in.)
FIGURE 4
LOCATION OF PORT AND SAMPLING POINTS,
STATION M
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
3 3/8
4 7/8
6 1/2
8 1/4
10 1/8
12 1/4
14 5/8
17 5/8
22
34
38 3/8
41 3/8
43 3/4
45 7/8
47 3/4
49 1/2
51 1/8
52 5/8
54
23
-------
INNER STACK DIA. = 60 in.
SAMPLING PORT
2 1/2
FIGURE 5
LOCATION OF PORT AND SAMPLING POINTS, STATION N
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC,
Sampling
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
' 14
15
16
IV
18
19
20
21
22 '
Distance From
Inner Wall (in.)
2 1/8
3 1/4
4 3/4
6 1/4
•8
9 5/8
11 5/8
13 7/8
16 3/8
19 3/8
23 7/8
36 1/8
40 5/8
43 5/8
. 46 1/4
48 3/8
50 3/8
52
53 3/4
55 3/8
56 3/4
58
24
-------
INNER STACK DIAMETER = 60 in.
Sampling Port
Sampling
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 -
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Distance From
Inner Wall (in)
2 3/8
4
5 7/8
7 3/4
9 7/8
12 1/4
15
18 3/8
24 1/4 .
36 3/4
41 5/8
.45
47 3/4
SO 1/8
52 1/4
54 1/4
56
57 5/8
FIGURE 6
LOCATION OF PORT AND SAMPLING POINTS,
STATION P
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
25
-------
INNER STACK DIAMETER = 37 1/2 in.
Sampling Port
Sampling
Point
Distance From
Inner Wall (in.)
FIGURE 1
LOCATION OF PORT AND SAMPLING POINTS,
STATION R
C. F. CHEMICALS, INC.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1 1/4
2 1/8
2 7/8
3 7/8
4 7/8
6 1/8
7 1/4
8 5/8
10 1/4
12 1/8
14 7/8
22 5/8
25 3/8
27 3/8
28 7/8
30 1/4
31 1/2
32 5/8
33 5/8
34 5/8
35 1/2
36 3/8
26
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
T
A. Preliminary Moisture Determination
The preliminary moisture content of the stack gases at each
sampling site was determined by Method 4 of the Federal Register
(Volume 36, Number 247, Part II, December 23, 1971).
The only significant difference between F. R. Method 4 and
the method used was the configuration of the sampling train (see
Figure 8). The sampling train used in these tests consisted of the
first two midget impingers with five grams of distilled-deionized water
followed by two dry midget impingers in place of a silica gel cartridge.
At sampling sites where liquid entrainment was a problem, the
preliminary and final moisture contents were determined from wet and
dry bulb thermometry. See Appendix B for the data used in determining
the preliminary moisture content of the stack gases.
After completing the moisture run, the total impinger liquid
plus water rinsings of the probe tip thorough the fourth impinger were
placed in an eight ounce polyethylene container. The samples were held
by EPA personnel for further analyses.
B. Preliminary Velocity Determination
Method two of the above mentioned Federal Register was used as
a guide in determining the preliminary stack gas velocity for each source
tested. The major difference was that only the maximum and minimum
27
-------
velocity heads across each stack area were determined so that a proper
nozzle size could be selected. During each of the three fluoride
emission tests, velocity head readings were taken at points selected
by using Method 1 of the Federal Register.
Stack pressure and temperature measurements were also made during
the preliminary velocity determinations.
C. Sampling for Fluoride Emissions
The sampling procedure used for determining fluoride emissions
was similar to Method 5 of the Federal Register. The major difference
between the two methods was the configuration of the sampling train.
The sampling train described in the Federal Register has a heated box
containing the filter holder directly following the glass probe. The
sampling train used in these tests contained no heated box and the filter
holder was placed between the third and fourth impingers (between dry
impinger and silica gel impinger) to prevent sample carry-over. Figure
9 is a schematic diagram of the sampling train used.
After the selection of the sampling site arid the minimum number
of sampling points per Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register,
three separate test runs were performed. For each run, the required
stack and sampling parameters were recorded on field data sheets. They
are included in Appendix B. Readings were taken at each traverse point
at least every five minutes, and when significant changes in stack para-
meters necessitated additional adjustments to maintain an isokinetic flow
rate. Nomographs were used to aid in the rapid adjustment of the sampling
28
-------
rate. The traverse points were selected to maintain at least one inch
from the inner stack wall.
After each run, the liquid volume in the first three impingers
was measured volumetrically and the silica gel was reweighed. The im-
pinger liquid, the filter, plus the water washings of the probe and other
sampling train components up to the silica gel were placed into poly-
ethylene containers. During some runs the different sample fractions
were placed in separate containers, while during others, all the re-
covered sample was placed into one container (See Appendix D). Field
data sheets are included in Appendix B.
D. Sampling and Analytical Procedure for Ammonia
Ammonia was collected from the stack gas stream by passing the
gas through three series-connected midget impingers containing 15 ml
of IN sulfuric acid. The sampling procedure was conducted per the EPA
Officer and is very similar to the procedure described by Decker and
Hogan in the U.S.P.H.S. publication "Determination of Ammonia in Stack
Gas."
The apparatus consisted of a heated glass probe, midget impingers,
pump, rotameter, and a dry gas test meter assembled as shown in Figure
10. Glass wool was placed in the end of the probe to act as a filter.
Glass ball joint connectors were used between the probe and Impingers.
The first three impingers contained the absorbing reagent and the fourth
Impinger was left dry to collect any entrained liquid.
The sampling train was leak tested prior to sampling by plugging
the inlet of the first impinger and letting the pump create a vacuum
on the system. Any movement of the dry test meter was then recorded.
Due to the sensitivity of the analytical method only a small
sample was required. The sampling rate was maintained at approximately
29
-------
0.1 CFM for a 30-m1nute sampling time.
After each of the three sample runs, the total impinger liquid
plus a distilled water rinsing of all four impingers was placed into
an eight-ounce polyethylene jar for storage.
Field data sheets are contained in Appendix B.
E. Liquid and Product Grab Samples
Periodically, during each test run, grab samples of the raw
materials, finished product, and scrubber liquid were taken, and the
temperature and pH were determined at the site. On some occasions,
the samples were split with the plant personnel so that comparative
analyses could be performed.
F. Laboratory Analysis Procedures
Water soluble fluorides were done by a sulfuric acid distillation
followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD. Water insoluble fluorides
were first fused with NaOH followed by a sulfuric acid distillation then
by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD.
Ammonia is quantitatively recovered as ammonia borate by using a
modified kjeldahl distillation procedure. The ammonia samples were
split with plant personnel. The analyses done by the Environmental
Protection Agency are reported.
PgOg analysis of the stack effluent was done by EPA personnel.
For more details of exact method used see Appendix C.
30
-------
5 ml H,0
S ml H^O
1. Nozzle (Optional)
2. Heated Glass Probe with Glass Wool as Filter
3. Ice Bath
4. Midget Impingcr Containing
5. Midget Ir.ipinger Containing
6. Midget Impinger, Dry .. '
7. Diy Midget Impinge-r
8. Flexible Sample Line
9. Drying Tube
10. Pump
11. Control Valve
12. Rotameter
13. Dry Test Meter
14. Thermometer
FIGURE 8
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
10
1. Nozzle
2. Heated Glass Probe
3. Glass Connector
4. Ice bath
5. Impinger with 100 nil Distilled FLO
6. Iiupinger with 100 ml Distilled H~0
7. Impinger, Dry
8. Filter Holder Containing No.
9. Irnpinger with Silica Gel
10. Thenno.T.eter
11. Flexible Sample Line
12. Vacuum Gauge
13. Main Control Valve
14. Air Tight Vacuum Pump
15. By-pass Control Valve
16. Thermometer
17. Dry Test Meter
18. Thermometer
19. Calibrated Orifice
20. Inclined Manometer
21. "S" Type Pitot Tube
22. Inclined Manometer
1
H
t-x—
o—
led H
led H
2 3
j -rjL_:
-* ^^*
i
.- ..-..fx V-
" r-''
. Usst.^
70 22
2°
1 Whitman Pi ^ i-o-r
:
:
-
-~
M
i
L
J
•>»
-^
FIGURE 9-
FLUORIDE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
£P4
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
t/4
Nozzle (Optional)
Heated Glass Probe with Glass Wool as Filter
Ice Bath
Midget Impingers Containing 15 ml 1NILSO,,
Midget Impingers Containing 15 ml IMHSOT
Midget Impingers Containing 15 ml 1NIKSO?
Dry Midget Impinger 4
Flexible Sajnple Line
Drying Tube
Piunp
Control Valve
Rotameter
Dry Test Meter
Thermometer
11
FIGURE 10
ANMDNIA SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
APPENDICES
34
-------
APPENDIX A
Emission Calculations and Results
-------
E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE SHEET
PB - Barometric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
As - Stack area, sq. ft.
AS1- Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. ft.
NPTS - Number of traverse points where the pitot velocity head was greater than zer
TS - Stack temperature, °R
TM - Meter temperature, °R
H - Average square root of velocity head, Vinches H20
AH - Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches H20
AN - Sampling nozzle area, square feet
CP - S-type pitot tube correction factor
VM - Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
VC - Condensate and silica gel increase in impringers, milliliters
Po - Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, fPB +A H~) inches Hg
L 13.6]
STP - Standard conditions, dry, 70°F, 29.92 inches Hg
VWV - Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
VSTPD - Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
VT - 'Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
W - Moisture fraction of stack gas
FDA - Dry gas fraction
MD - Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (dry conditions)
MS - Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (stack conditions)
GS - Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to air
EA - Excess air, %
VHxTS_ - Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
U - Stack gas velocity, feet per minute
QS - Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (stack conditions)
QD - Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (dry conditions)
QSTPD - Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (STP)
PISO - Percent isokinetic volume sampled (method described in Federal Register)
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
VWV = (0.0474) x (VC)
VSTPD = (17.71 x (VM) x (PB + AIL. ) -i- TM
13.6
VT = (VWV) + (VSTPD)
W = (VWV)-i-(VT)
FDA = (1.0) - (W)
FMOIST = Assumed moisture fraction
MD = (0.44 x % CO ) + (0.32 x % 02) + (0.28 x % N2) + (0.28 x % CO)
MS = (MD x FDA) + (18 x W)
GS = (MS)-*- (28.99)
EA = [(100) x (% 02 - ^2^-)J -r- Qo.266 x % N£) - (% 02 - %2CO
U = (174) x (CP) x (H) x \^(TS x 29.92)~(GS x PS)
QS = (U) x (AS)
QD = (QS) x (FDA)
QSTPD = (QD) x ( 53°) x (Z5.)
29.92 TS
PISO = (o.oo267 x VC x TS) + (PQ x TS x VM-2-TM) -f- (Time x U x PS x AN)
Fluoride Emissions:
MG = Milligrams of fluoride from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG) ^ VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF)-j-(TS)
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD)
?205 Fed = Tons/hour, determined from plant data
Lbs/ton P205 Fed = (Ibs/hour)~ (Tons/hour P205 Fed)
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING AMMONIA EMISSIONS
VSTPD = 17.71 x VM x (PB + -~g] * TM
FDA = obtained from fluoride emission test
QSTPD = obtained from fluoride emission test
Ammonia Emissions:
Mg = Milligrams of NH3, determined from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG) -s VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF) * TS
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD)
NH, Fed = Tons/hour, determined from plant data
Lbs/ton NH3 Fed = (Ibs/hour) -t (tons/hour Nh'3 Fed)
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
•r
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
. TEST NO.
fJAMK OF FIRM C.F. CHEMICALS
NO. OF RUNS 3
LOCATION OF PLANT BAR TOW FLORIDA
TYPE OF PLANT D.A.P.
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION STATION K REACTOR SHRnnnrn nrfpj-.PT
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED
DRUN NO.-
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIME END
S)BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
' &)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20
7) VOL DRY GAS Q METER CONDITIONS, ft3
B) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
3)VOL DRY GAS @ S.T.P.*, ft3
10)TOTAL //20 COLLECTED, ml
11)VOL WATER VAPOR COLL. @ S.T.P., ft3
.12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
14)? CO
15)| 022
16)2 CO
17)% #2 '
18)% EXCESS AIR
19) MOLECULAR VT. OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)l-iOLECULAR VT. OF STACK CAS, STACK COIW.
2DSTACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, REF . TO AIR
22)AVGWL'L. HEAD OF STACK GAS , "H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE ,°F
2H)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
25)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
2&)STACK GAS VEL Q STACK COIW., fpm
27)STACK AREA, ft2
2Q)STACK GAS FLOW RATE Q S.T.P.f scfm
23) NET TIME OF TEST, min, •
30)SAMPLII1G NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
3 1 ) PERCENT ISOKINETIC
32)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
35)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3&)FLOURIDE - WATER SOL. GR/CF STK COIW.
3DFLOURIDE - TOTAL GR/CF STK COND.
3Q)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
3$)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
HDFLOURIDE - WATER SOL. LB/TON P205 FED.
*2)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LBS/TON P205 FED.
1
12/16/71
1C: 20
18: 20
30
2.29
108.461
96.1
104.233
6"-2.3
30.45
22.6
8
0
19.4
0
80. G
951
28.78
26.34
0. 91
0,949
164
0.83
29
3647. 1
9. G2
23066 '
120
0.25
1 n Q &
J. VJ j , U
67
67.67
0. 0095
0.0096
0.0061
0.0061
1. 8805
1. 8993
0.0646
0.0653
2
12/13/71
13:45
15:45
30
3.49
134.054
79.4
133.2
1037.1
49.16
27
22
0
21
0
79
150000
28 . 3 4
25.92
0.89
Iii r" *i
. 'r U 1
1 6 'J . 5
0.83
29
5G89
9 . G 2
33GGO
120
Oi~\ t~
.25
(-\ x*
y o
147
147.77
0. 0169
0. 017
0.0101
0.0101
4. 8714
4. 8969
0. 1949
0. 1959
3
12/20/71
13: 00
20: 00
30
2. 2.2
104.333
81.8
102. 895
G70. 5
31.78
•23.6
22
0
20. G
0
70.4
3358
28.82
2G. 27
0. 91
OO 1 1
. J .L /
170
0.83
29
3547.9
9f* O
. U 2
21940
1.20
OO r
. / J
1-1 O '7
.L O . /
57
64. 3
0.0084
0. 0095
0. 0052
0. 0059
1. 5819
1.7845
0.0625 .
0.0705
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
. TEST HO.
NAME OF FIRM C. F. CHEMICALS
NO. OF RUNS 3
LOCATION OF PLANT BARTON FLORIDA
'TYPE OF PLANT D.A.P.
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION STATION L DRYER SCRUBBER INLET
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED
\)RUU NO.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
. UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "f^O
7)VOL DRY GAS @ METER CONDITIONS, ft3
B) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
9)VOL DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*, ft3
10) TOTAL 11-2.0 COLLECTED, ml
1DVOL WATER VAPOR COLL. @ S.T.P., ft3
.12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
14)2 C02
15)2 02
16H CO
17)2 7/2
18)% EXCESS AIR
\$)UOLECULAR l/T. OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR UT. OF STACK GAS, STACK COND.
2DSTACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, REF . TO AIR
22)AVG~V'VEL. tiEAD OF STACK GAS , "H20
2 3 )/l VERA GE STA CK GAS TEMPERATURE , °F
2H)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
25)STACK GAS VEL Q STACK COND., fpm
27)STACK AREA, ft 2
2B)STACK GAS FLOW RATE Q S.T.P., scfm
29)//£T TIME OF TEST, min.
30)SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
SDPERCEHT ISOKINETIC
32)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL,MG
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF •
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3&)FLOURIDE - WATER SOL. GR/CF STK COND.
37)FLOURIDE - TOTAL GR/CF STK COND.
38)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
39)FLUORIDE - TOTAL. -LB/HOUR
HDFLOURIDE - WATER SOL. LB/TON P205 FED.
*2)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LBS/TON P20S FED.
1
12/1G/71
16:20
10: 20
30
1.75
94.054
129
05. 22S
435. G
2 0 . G 5
19. 5
9
0
20.4
0
79. G
2G37
20.32
26. 71
0. 92
0 . 7 4 9
1 C 0 . 1
0. C3
30
2G01.G
15. 9
30655'
120
0. 25
107. G
154
216
0. 0252
0. 0354
0.0174
0. 0244
6.6244
9. 2914
0. 2276
0. 3193
2
12/18/71
13: 50
15: 50
30
1.72
93.902
107.4
08.380
215.9
10.23
10.4
18
0
20.5
0
79.5
31G8
28.82
27.7
0 . 9 G
0.811
149.6
0.83
30
2955.2
15.9
3 G G 2 5
120
0.25
93 .G
91 '
141
0. 0149
0. 0231
0. 0116
0. 018
4.6803
7. 2519
0. 1872
0.2901
3
12/20/71
13:05
20: 05
30
1.G2
0 G . 0 9 7
114. 4
8 1 . G 2 7
170.1
8. OG
9
10
0
20.99
20
0 . 9 7
0.765
151.1
0. C3
30^
2 7 7 G . 1
15.9 •
341! 5 5
120
0.25
91
22.6
37. 9
0.004
0. 0066
0.0031
0.0052
1. 1801
1.979
0. 0466
0.0782
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM C. F. CHEMICALS
NO. OF RUNS 3
LOCATION OF PLANT BARTOW FLORIDA
TYPE OF PLANT D.A.P.
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
.SAMPLING POINT LOCATION STATION M DRYER SCRUBBER OUTLET
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED
DRUN NO. ' '
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
k)TIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
G)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "l^O
7) POL DRY GAS Q METER CONDITIONS, ft3
B) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
9)K0L DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*, ftj
10)TOTAL 7720 COLLESTED, ml
11)70 L WATER VAPOR COLL. ® S.T.P. t ft3
.12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
13)ASSUMED STACK CAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
!«*)% C02
15)% 02
16)% CO
17)% //2
18)% EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULAR WT. OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR UT. OF STACK GAS. STACK COND.
2DSTACK GAS SP. GRAVITY. REF. TO AIR
22)AVG-VVEL. HEAD OF STACK GAS . "H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE ,° F
2H)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
2S)STACK GAS VEL (3 STACK COND., fpm
2 7 )S TACK AREA.' ft2
2B)STACK GAS FLOW RATE @ S.T.P., scfm
23) NET TIME OF TEST, min.
3Q)SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
3DPERCEUT ISOKINETIC
32)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
m)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3&)FLOURIDE - WATER SOL. GR/CF STK COND.
3DFLOURIDE - TOTAL GR/CF STK COND.
3B)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
3B)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
HDFLOURIDE - WATER SOL. LB/TON P205 FED.
H2)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LBS/TON P205 FED.
1
12/16/71
17:30
10:12
30
2. 32
83. 382
93.4
80.528
225
10.67
11.7
13.0
0.6
10.8
0
70.6
1 4 4 1
28.80
27.61.
0.05
0*7 ^ O
. / i J
132
0. 83
28.1
2803.8
In f»
7 .-1
30130
In r\
02
0.25
"i r\ *7 o
1 0 / . o
2.4
2. 466
0.0004
0. 0005
0. 0003
0. 0003
0. 1486
0.1527
0. 0051
0. 0052
2
12/18/71
13:45
15:33
30
1.8
80.732
76.6
80. 301
225
10.67
11.7
15
0
20
0
80
1503
28.8
27. 53
0.05
0*y r\ r~
.705
111
0. 83
28. 1
2576. 1
17. 1
36103
102
0.25
110.5
8.1
8.42"
0.0015
0.0016
0. 0012
0.0012
0.4781
0.5054
0. 0191
0.0202
3
12/20/71
18 :on
1 0 : 3 F>
30
1. 88
75.425
82
74. 204
262
1 P . 4 2
1 4 . 3
0.7
0
20.3
0
70.7
2255
28. Cl
27. 26
0.04
0.641
110.0
0 . C 3
28. ?.
2340. 0
17. 1
31070
06
0.25
120.8
1. 2
1.41
0. 0002
0. 0003
0. 0002
0. 0002
0. 0671
0. 0789
.0. 0027
0. 0031
70
29.92..iru.JH£
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
TEST NO.
NO. OF RUNS
NAME OF FIRM C. F. CHEMICALS
LOCATION OF PLANT BARTOW FLORIDA
TYPE OF PLANT D.A.P.
C011TRO L EOUI PMEN T
SAMPLING POINT LOCATIOil STATION N COOLER SCRUBBER INLET
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED
1)RUN NO.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "I^O
1)VOL DRY GAS Q METER CONDITIONS, ft3
B)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
Q)VOL DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*, ft3
10)TOTAL //2
1HO
0.83
29. 71
2132. 5
19.63
3 R 0 1 9
121
0.25
100.5
34
64.2
0.0065
0.0123
0.0055
0.0105
2.0058
3.7874
0. 0689
0. 1302
2
12/18/71
13:50
15:51
30
1. 22
74.567
76.7
74.057
33.1
1. 57
2.1
3
0
20. 3
0
79.7
2255
28". 81
28. 59
0.99
0 . 566
140
0. 83
29.71
2023. 0
19.63
34373
121
0.25
103. 3
25 '
43. 5
0. 0052
0.009
0. 0044
0.0077
1. 5209
2. 646U
0.0608
0.1059
3
12/20/71
1C :00
20:01
30
1. 75
06.616
04. 7
04. 862
45. 8
'2.17
2. 5
3
0
20
0
00
1563
28. 8
20. 53
0.98
Or o tt
.DuO
140
0.83
29. 71
2450. P>
19.63
41447
121
0. 25
08.1
31
48.6
0.0055
0. 0086
0. 0047
0. 0074
1.9578
3. 0693
0. 0774
0. 1213
*D7?Y. 70
29.92.
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM C. F. CHEMICALS
LOCATION OF PLANT BARTOW FLORIDA
TYPE OF PLANT D.A.P.
• CONTROL EQUIPMENT
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION STATION P C.O(
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED
DRUU NO.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIUE END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
G)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "l^O
7) VOL DRY GAS Q METER CONDITIONS, ft5
B)AVEHAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
V)VOL DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*t ft3
10)TOTAL 1120 COLLESTED, ml
1DVOL WATER VAPOR COLL. @ S.T.P., ft3
.12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK CAS MOISTURE, %VOt'UME
iu)% co2
15)% 02
16)% CO
17)% N2
18)% EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULAR WT. OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR WT. OF STACK GAS, STACK COND.
2DSTACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, REF . TO AIR
22)AVG^VbL. HEAD OF STACK GAS , "H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE ,° F
2H)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
25)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
2&)STACK GAS VEL Q STACK COND., fpm
2DSTACK AREA,' f 1 2
2Q)STACK GAS FLOW RATE @ S.T.P., scfm
29)/Y£T TIME OF TEST, min.
30)SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
3DPERCEUT ISOKINETIC
32)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL ,MG
34) FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3&)FLOURIDE - WATER SOL. GR/CF STK COND.
37)FLOURIDL' - TOTAL GR/CF STK COND.
36)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
M)FLOURIDE - WATER SOL. LB/TON P205 FEZ?.
H2)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LBS/TON P205 FED.
NO. OF RUNi
iT.F.n srnimtiT
l
12/10/71
1G: 32*
18: 29
30
2.23
90.39
1 1 C . 4
83.789
227. 5
10. 78
11.4
10. 5
0
19.5
0
80. 5
1019
20.70
27.55
0.95
0 . CIS
124.1
0.03
20.7
2 9 7 2 . G
19. G3
4G921
?^r
0.25
9 1 . u
2.8
2.8
0. 0005
0.0005
0. 0004
0.0004
0. 1918
0.1918
0.0066
0.0066
> 3
^ OUTLET
i
12/18/71
13:46
15:43
30
.2. 50
105. 346
104. 7
99. 759
221. 5
10. 5
9. 5
11 . 5
0
20. G
0
79.4
3958
20 . 82
27.79
0.9G
0.075
100 '
0. 03
28.7
3117.9
19. G3
52423
117
0.25
97 . 6
4.6.
4. 671
0.0007
0.0007
0. 0006
0. 0006
0. 3021
0. 3068
0.0121
0.0123
3
12/20/71
13 : 00
19:57
30
3.31
123.14
117. 5
114.24
19C
9. 23
7 . 5
11.5
0
2 0 . 3
0
79.7
2255
23.31
28
0.97
Of ^
, .; ^
05 **
0 . C 3
5?;;! ..
349 J . (,
1 9 . J. 3
G 0 T. 7 5
117
'),'.""'^
'Jl' ' '"
2. 7
2. 751
0. 0003
0. 0003
0. 0003
0. 0003
0. 1756
0. 1789
0. 0069
0. 0071
'DRY. 70 "F. 29.92 in.
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM C. F. CHEMICALS
NO. OF RUNS a
LOCATION OF PLANT BARTOV FLORIDA
TYPE OF PLANT D.A.P.
CONTROL EQUIPMENT
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION STATION R REACTOR SCRUBBER INLET
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED
DRUN no.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20
7) VOL DRY GAS Q METER CONDITIONS, ft3
B) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
3) VOL DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*, ft3
10) TOTAL II 2 0 COLLECTED, ml
11)VOL WATER VAPOR COLL. @ S.T.P., ft3
.12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
1 u ^ */ m
A • J *a v L/ r\
\ o
16)2 CO
18)2 EXCESS AIR
19) MOLECULAR UT. OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR WT. OF STACK GAS, STACK COND.
21)STACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, REF. TO AIR
22)AVG~VVEL. HEAD OF STACK GAS , "H20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE ,° P
2H)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
2&)STACK GAS VEL @ STACK COND., fpm
27)STACK AREA, ft 2-
2B)STACK GAS FLOW RATE Q S.T.P.f scfm
29)//£T TIME OF TEST, min.
3Q)SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
3DPERCENT ISOKINETIC
32)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
. 33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL ,MG
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3&)FLOURIDE - WATER SOL. GR/CF STK COtlD.
37)FLOURIDE - TOTAL GR/CF STK COND.
3Q)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
HDFLOURIDE - WATER SOL. LB/TON P205 FED.
H2)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LBS/TON P205 FED.
1
12/1C/71
16:35
18:40
30
4. 04
1 2 G . 2
102. 0
120. 332
1039
49. 25
29
28
0
19.8
0
80. 2
1291
2 3 . 7 9
25. GG
0. 89
1*1 A r
« 1 Ob
171. G
0.03
29 *
4337.9
7 f , 7
/ . u /
19012
110
X X \J
0 '} ^
\J * f- *J
128 1
JL 4. U • X
143
164 4
A U ~ • ~
0.0175
0. 0201
0.0101
0. 0116
2.9628
3.4062
0. 1018
0.1171
2
12/18/71
13:4 5
15:38
30
2.65
91.153
73. 3
91.427
834.6
39. 56
30.2
0
0
20.7
0
79. 3
5256
28. 83
25 . 56
0. 88
In *7 o
• U / o
171. 3
0.83
f\ f\ j
29 <
4231.6
7 67
' • \J f
.19019
110
0.25
101.4
3
12/20/71
18 :05
19: 59
30
2. 34
86.1
85. 8
84. 318
856
40. 57
32. 5
35
0. 7
19. 8
0
79. 5
1470
28. 9
o c *5 r
25 . 36
00 T
.87
1 nor,
JL • \J *.. *J
173. 4
0.83
1 O V
^ .i
4047. 9.
7.67
17540
110
-0.25
101.4
71 ' 319
91.3 1 373
0.012 0.0571
0. 0154 °- 0667
0.0068 0.0312
0.0088 0.0365
1.9551 8.5767
2.5141 10.0285
0.0782 .0.339
0.1006 0.3964
*r)KY. 70
29.92 In. HfC
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS DATA
PLANT n.v. rr>F?*ir/\r,$. l/'/r.
STACK D.A .P. #(0. 3 5"A™TOII K
Run No.
Date
Time Started
Time Ended
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
. Final Meter Reading Ft
3
Initial Meter Reading Ft
0
Meter Volume (meter cond. Ft )
Gas Volume Sampled, *Ft3
Meter Temperature °F
Stack Temperature °F
3
Average Gas Flow Rate, *Ft /min
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia Ibs/hr
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Ammonia gr/SCF
Ammonia gr/CF Stack Cond.
• .
l
12/1F/71
18:55
. 19:25
30
29
11 .711
8 . 4 H 9
3.272
3.133
95
1H4
2 3 n G 6
1.3
1.2632
0 . 2 7 4 R 1
0 . 0 0 f; 3 4 R f>
o. o nun 4 5 3
2
12/18/71
16: 05
1 G : 3 5
30
29
14, 824
11.725
3.099
3. 0329
83
170
33GGO
l.fi
2 . G 3 F. 6
0.23 5 4j.
0.0090804
0. 005 H 051
3
12/20/7 1
20 : 1.5
20:45
30
29
17.751
14.824
2. 927
2.8541
85
170
21940
0.3
0.3008
0. 00292 n 7
0.0016
0.0010
* Dry, 70°F, 29,92 "Hg
vnt-intnnu'nlal rnginevrinq, iru;
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS DATA
PLANT g.F. MWICALSi IV C.
STACK P. A. P. 7/fl. 3 fSTATIOfJ L
, FLA.
Run No.
Date
Time Started
Time Ended
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
3
. Final Meter Reading Ft
3
Initial Meter Reading Ft
3
Meter Volume (meter cond. Ft )
Gas Volume Sampled, *Ft3
Meter Temperature °F
Stack Temperature °F
3
Average Gas Flow Rate, *Ft /min
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia Ibs/hr
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Ammonia gr/SCF
Ammonia gr/CF Stack Cond.
l
12/1 P / 7 1
19: 00
10: 30
30
29.7
1 5 8 . 4 U
1 5 5 . H 7
2.97
2.7306
118
160
30655
170. 5
252.62
' 5't.918
0.95533
0.65257
2
12/18/71
16 • 30
17 :00
30
29. 7
258.1
255.11
2. 989
2.8263
102
150
3 G G 2 5
120.7
21R.69
19. 3U7
0.60507
0. 53002
3
12/20/71
20 : MO
21 : 10
30
29. 7
353.57
350. 57
3
2. 7582
118
151
3 H 8 5 5
160.3
267.35
25. 707
0.88919
0.69673
* Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
cni'intnmcntal engineering,
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS DATA
PLANT n. F. ' MEruMLS, inc.
JJAHVQV. FLA.
STACK n.A.P. HO. 3 STAFIOF M
Run No.
Date
Time Started
Time Ended
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
. Final Meter Reading Ft3
3
Initial Meter Reading Ft
3
Meter Volume (meter cond. Ft )
3
Gas Volume Sampled, *Ft
Meter Temperature °F
Stack Temperature °F
3
Average Gas Flow Rate, *Ft /min
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia Ibs/hr
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Ammonia gr/SCF
Ammonia gr/CF Stack Cond.
1
12/16/71
19:00
19! 30
30
20.1
96.437
93.253
3.104
3.0407
95
132 .
39130
0. 04
0 . 0 f, 7 7 5 0
0.01473
0. 0002007 4
0. 00014904
2
12/10/71
in: oo
16:30
30
20.1
100. 53
97.4
3.13
3.1032
76
111
36103
2
3. 0709
0.27419
0. 0090G07
0. 0075902
3'
12/20/71
20 :00
20:30
30
28.1
103. 50
100. 57
3.014
2.9497
83
111
31979
1
1.4300
'0.13758
0. 005187
0.0030751
* Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
vnqincvrinq. inc.
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS DATA
PLANT r.F. cwwicALSt
PAP rOV t FLA
STACK V.A.P. UP. 3 RTATIOfl 11
Run No.
Date
Time Started
Time Ended
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
3
Final Meter Reading Ft
3
Initial Meter Reading Ft
3
Meter Volume (meter cond. Ft )
Gas Volume Sampled, *Ft3
Meter Temperature °F
Stack Temperature °F
Average Gas Flow Rate, *Ft /min
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia Ibs/hr
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Ammonia gr/SCF
Ammonia gr/CF Stack Cond.
.>. • •
1
12/16/71
19: 00
. ID: 30
30
29. 7
3. 52
0.61
2.91
2. 8117
90
140
36019
23. 2
39.225
8. 5272
0.12624
0.10782
2
12/18/71
16: 03
16- 33
30
29.7
7.159
3. 543
3.616
3. 5194
86
140
34373
0. 05
0. 06445
0. 00575 4 5
0. 00021737
0. 00018R59
3
12/20/71
20; 05
20: 35
30
29. 7
10. 291
7.17
3.121
3.0266
88
140
41447
0.1
0.18074
0.017379
0. 00050553
0. 00043218
* Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
enrintnmenlal engineering, inc.
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS DATA
PLANT C.F.
inc.
FLA
STACK 77. A . P. l-JQ . 3
STATIOH P
Run No.
Date
Time Started
Time Ended
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Meter Reading Ft
3
Initial Meter Reading Ft
Meter Volume (meter cond. Ft )
Gas Volume Sampled, *Ft
Meter Temperature °F
Stack Temperature °F
Average Gas Flow Rate, *Ft3/min
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia Ibs/hr
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Ammonia gr/SCF
Ammonia gr/CF Stack Cond.
l
12/16/71
19: 45
• 20:15
30
28.7
486.88
483. 54
3. 338
3.179
98
124
40921
1.6
3.1168
0.67756
0.0077006
0.0059394
2
12/18/71
16:15
16:45
30
28. 7
605. 37
601.32
4.047
3.7731
110
100
52423
1
1 . 8337
0.16373
0.0040551
0.0033316
3
12/20/71
20 : 20
20:50
30
28. 7
732.72
728. 81
3. 902
J
3. 556H
123
95
60575
0.2
.0.45029
0.043297
O.OOOR6033
0. 00072897
* Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
environmental engineering, inc.
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS DATA
PLANT C.F. MFlflMLS. IIJC.
PL A
STACK P. A. P. NO. 3 S TAT 1011 7?
Run No.
Date
Time Started
Time Ended
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
3
Final Meter Reading Ft
3
Initial Meter Reading Ft
3
Meter Volume (meter cond. Ft )
Gas Volume Sampled, *Ft3
Meter Temperature °F
Stack Temperature °F
3
Average Gas Flow Rate, *Ft /min
Ammonia, mg
Ammonia Ibs/hr
Ammonia Ib/ton NH3 fed
Ammonia gr/SCF
Ammonia gr/CF Stack Cond.
••
l
12/16/71
18: 56
- 19:27
30
29
10.4
7.4
3
2.8571
98
174
19812
57.9
52.99
11 . 52
0. 31006
0.17837
2
12/18/71
15:51
16: 21
30
29
14.05
10.5
3.55
3.4426
88
171
19019
1 2 H 7 . 9
924.48
82.543
5.G35
3. 2021
3
12/20/71
19: 12
19:43
30
29
16.9
14.1
2.8
2.6666
98
173
17540
257.4
223.45
21 .486
1.4769
0. 80901
* Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
vnuintnntcnlnl
, nc.
-------
SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
-------
Flow: 19812(DSCFM)
Total Fluoride: 3.41 (#/HR)
Ammonia: 53 (#/HR)
30655-
9.29
252.6
36019
3.79
39.2
(Liquid
In
Reactor Scrubber
No. 2
Efficiency: (F~) 44.3%
(NH,)97.6%
To
Atmosphere
Liquid
In
Liquid
Out
Dryer Scrubber
Efficiency: 98.4%
99.9%
L->-\
Liquid
In
Liquid
Out
M) 3913C
0.1E
0.07
Cooler Scrubber
Efficiency: 95.0%
92.1%
23066
1.90
1.26
Liquid
Out
46921
0.19
3.1
109117
2.24
C. F. Chemicals
Diammonium Phosphate
Run 1
-------
Flow: 19019 (DSCFM)
Total
Fluoride: 2.51 (#/HR)
Ammonia 924 (#/HR)
36625
7:25^
216.7
34373
2.65
0.06
j Liquid
o'n
J<
Reactor Scrubber
No. 2
Efficiency: ^ £7%
Liquid L
In O
1 J'
9 Liquid
Out
Dryer Scrubber
Efficiency: 93.0%
98.6%
Liquid 1
In. 0 •
i *
( ) Liquid
V Out
vs
Cooler Scrubber
Efficiency: 88.3%
- %
1
»«^
->-|
n
4
X"
(K
?\
To
A Atmosphere
f) 122213
Y 5.72
?) 33660
-/ 4.90
2.64
36130
0-51
3.07^.
^
v»
- /?\
' ty
52423
0.31
1.8
Cj Liquid
C. F. Chemicals
Diammonium Phosphate
Run 2
-------
Liquid In
To atmosphere
Flow: 17540 (DSCFM)
Total Fluoride: 10.03 (#/HF
Ammonia: 223 #/HR
34855
1.98
267.4
41447
3.07 .
0.18
h*.
•»"
Reactor Scrubber
No. 2
Efficiency (F") 82.3%
(NH3) 99.9%
c
[Liquid x
9 In
4/
5
Liquid ( \
' Out V.
Dryer Scrubber
Efficiency: 96.0%
99.5%
c
"1
Liqu'
Cooler Scrubber
Efficiency: 94.1%
-%
C
^
£
d ^
j
\ '
r Liquid
/ Out
6A 114594
A 21940
J 1.78
0.30
31979
0.08
1.43
^^
^S^-*'
60675
0.18
0.4
C.F. Chemicals
Diammonium Phosphate
Run 3
-------
APPENDIX B
Field Data
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE DETERMINATION
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Stack
Barometric Pressure
Moisture Content —- Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled
Average Meter Temperature
Average Meter Vacuum
Average Meter-Orifice AH
Sampling Rate
Barometric Pressure -3 Meter Orifice
Dry Gas Volume Sampled 3 70 "F, 29»92
Condensate Volume^
Water Vapor Volume § 70 °F, 29,92 "Hg frO^^J
Moisture Fraction, H20 O» O8 Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA.
•Moisture, Content —•- ?-^thcd 2
Dry Bulb Temp. *F Wet Bulb Temp. °J Dew Point Temp
Vapor Pressure Of K20 3 DP "Hg Stack Pressure'
Moisture Fraction, K20 Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA.
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular //eight, Md = J0.44(;fc02)] +^O2(^022/ + £J.28(£N2 + C0)]= .
Molecular //eight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms =[(Mci)x(FDA)] + j7i8)x(H20)| =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Me) ~ (28.99) =
Ft3
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant . ieffie, 0 t nCL . stack
Date /O °F Wet Bulb Temp. /Z£ °F Dew Point Tern p. /22 °F
Vapor Pressure Of H20 3 DP 3.64* "H? Stack Pressure ^^ 7 "H?
Moisture Fraction, npO &• /2- Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA ^» $&
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = [o.^C^l] +§.32Ci022| + J0.2S(^N2 + CO)] =
Molecular Weight § Stack Conditions, Ms =^Md)xCFDA)j + |7l8)x(H202J =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -f (28.99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
/*. /T £d0*»/t*/< !**£.
Plant . 0*»t*< *£. Stack
Moistur? Content — Method 1
Date /2~/&~ 7f Sample Time /£2& - /&&> Barometric Pressure 30 "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
939. &*
#34. 7J0
0 Ft3
Ft3
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled 3 • r&V Ft3
Average Meter Temp3rature
Average Meter Vacuum
Average Meter Orifice A H
Sampling Rate
Barometric Pressure <3 Meter Orifice
Dry Gas Volume Sampled 3 70 8F, 29.92 "Hg,
e
Condensate Volume
Water Vapor Volume •§ 70 °F, 29,92 "Hg
Moisture Fraction, HoO O» /*[• Fraction Of
gz
—
o./z
J.g
30
3.&Z3
/&.&
&S02.
Dry Air, FDA
oF
"He
"HoO
LR-I
"Hz
Ft3
ml
TT4-3
A 86
Moisture Content — --'ethod 2
Dry Bulb Temp. IF Wet Bulb Temp. ^F Dew Point Temp.
Vapor Pressure Of KoO 3 DP "Hg Stack Pressure,: J'Hg
*• **-'
Moisture Fraction, r^O Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = ^.^(^C021] +[p.32(^C22J +(0.28(^M2 + Co]] =
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms =[(Md)x(FDA)] + (Tl8)x(H2olj =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -f- (28.99) = _
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant . .ie/ytca* /;g. Stack
ca* J/;g.
Date /£ " P " ?f Sample Time /2ffl - /2/S Barometric Pressure 3Q "Hg
Moisture Content — Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading _ ^ 3£, 0$) Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading _ &3&> /&£ Ft3
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled _ • _ Z
Average Meter Temperature _ _ 7 fa>
Average Meter Vacuum _ _ *"~
0*05
Average Meter • Orifice AH _
Sampling Rate _ ; _ j < _ LR-!
Barometric Pressure 3 Meter Orifice _ \ _ -30 _ "Hg
Dry Gas Volume Sampled 3 ?0 8F, 29.92 "Hg_ _ g. 7&B Ft3
•
Condensate Volume _ \ _ /• 3 _ ml
Water Vapor Volume § ?0 °F, 29,92 "Hg _ £>.£>& 2- Ft3
Moisture Fraction, HgO O+&£ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA O» 7<£
•Moisture Content — --'"thcd 2
Dry Bulb Teap./^0 °F Wet Bulb Temp. /$> °F Dew Point Temp. 9Z °F
Vapor Pressure Of H20 3 DP /> £/ "Hg Stack Pressure 29*7 "Hg
Moisture Fraction, r^O O*O£ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA &•
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular V/eight, Md = |o.^(;«C023] +[o.32(^02)l +J0.2S(^M2 + CO)] =
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms =[(Md):c(FDA)j + [?18)x(H2ol] =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -f- (28.99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
/? /r />/ * / /• /\ «j ^M9 <*i^ y * x/^"
Plant C»/T L>*?g/i>9/eL& /£ j -£#£. Stack Lsrfr **"J > <^jT^//DtQ /
Date /<&~/& "7/ Sample Time //SO ~/£tf$ Barometric Pressure 3*^ "Hg
Moisture Content —• Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading 39 /• $-S£ • Ft^
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading 39$' $-£& Ft3
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled /, 000 Ft3
Average Meter Temperature f@ °_F
Average Meter Vacuum • "* "Hg
Average Meter- Orifice A H
Sampling Rate
Barometric Pressure <§ Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ 70
Orifice
°F, 29.92 "Hg
' "Ho'
*?. £ LPM
"Hs
/7 0 / / -, ?
C/9 / & & Ft-3
Condensate Volume ^» Q ml
Water Vapor Volume % ?0 °F, 29,92 "H§ Q. // f
Moisture Fraction, HoO <^» /3 Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA O» 8 7
Moisture Content — ?-i°thod 2
Dry Bulb Temp. IF Wet Bulb Temp. IF Dew Point Temp. I
Vapor Pressure Of H20 @ DP "Hg Stack Pressure "Hg
Moisture Fraction, H20 Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = JO.^(£C021] +[o.32(;fo2)] -t-(0.28($N2 + Co]] = _
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms =[(Md)x(FDA)] + [?18)x(H2ol] =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Mg) -f (28.99) =
r
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant C.F. CJ?&M/£
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
SOURCE SlMPllNCnFlEUTPaTA SHEET
Plant C,h C^KerYtVai^ ' //"houri)' Mat'l Processing Rate
, ij . -r _rr_._. Yl> | ^ i_ y^..
^ Sampling Location ^ 0irrlei*' ReA.e_4«e** °F, WB °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Moisture 8 ! , FDAj| .9& Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press^^ "Hg> Stack Press-^Hg
Vveather fj&T
Temp. CF, W/D , W/S
Sample Box Mo. Meter Box No. J5
McterAfi? /.^^ Pitot Corr. Factor 0.5^*
Nozzle Dia. /tj in., Probe Length o ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: inside Diameter -4^2* ^n
Inside Area <£^/ ±t2
M^idhf -Ff-
Sketch o£ Stack
Final Gas Meter Reading ^452 . 379 ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading, "^^(j^ *J / & ft <
Total Condensate in Impingers b&5~ ml, /
Moisture in Silica Gel %$Jl & »l^li^ * giir
Silica Gel Container No£O£ Filter No.%?-£l23
Orsat: C00 <^
GO /^4^
CO ^
N,
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: £. /^?//CA^/
G . CT)p/ne,r
Remarks :
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from 1-nd
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
riLO)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp .
Gas S;.uiiple
Temp . 8 Dry
Gas Meter
r-pi
Box
Temp .
In
Out
Last
lii;pin<.er
Temp .
C°F)
Vac u i un'
on
Sainple
Train
7
^
-. 700
L^L
/&>
/oo
o
/OQ
97
M.
370 . 96
L££
.93-
U_
* ^
-------
Traverse
Point No.
froin Did
of Port
(in)
2JL
Gas Meter
Reading
Cft.3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H2P>
&.
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H0)
cal.
2M
Z •*• -t ••
iSL
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp ,
ra
MJ.
Gas Sample
Teinp.@ l)ry
Gas Meter
(UF)
In Out
15
Last
Impinger
Temp.-
~5Z.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C"Hg)
/JS
94
1
z.o
/£>•#
94
3
/c
.39
£*&
?
I*-'-.*'
do
7*0
i/r
-------
ni
ism
i „,..+.
± *.lj t L-
Sampling Location Outlet Reactor Scrubber •
Date &//?/ 11 ^ Run No
Time Start /3V^ Time End
Sampling Time/Point
±- °F> TO - -
DB
VF @ DP
"Hg
is turcj&&,% , FDA_4f , Gas Density Factor __
Barometric Press 36"Hg, Stack Pressffi'Hg
We a t he r
Temp.
C/oudc/ — /rOU
'
W/D
W/S
Sample Pox No . ^j} Meter Box No. v
Meter All@ .£> Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia,^2<5"in. , Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area ~
Height
Mnt'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter ReaJins; 596.322
Initial Gas Meter Reading
ft
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.flft.fff FiTterNo.
Orsat:
: CO, O
0., 21
co O
N,
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
'l>
in
It2
ft
Remarks:
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Di££,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.0 Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
Cal. Actual
In Out
Last
Tmpinger
Temp .
C°F)
Vacuum
on
Srunple
Train
("Hg)
7
<-£,&
4.
. 9
l'7°
Po
73
li^-
&Z.
J5
10
1.10
>70
J&3&
3.7
13Q_
$4
3
10"
#2.
AT
—t
-------
FIEHTMIJTSHEEr
Plant C..F. OW/ooIv T^AP
Sampling Location£XcbwJ$" KftCKLterv ^CLTUJLVWA
Date 12. IQJQ 111 Run No.
Time Start £,'Qo Time End Si O O
Sampling Time/Point [& /n/K/.
DB -— °F,
WB ^~ °F, VF @ DP "Hg
MoistureJ^ , FDA , Gas Density
Barometric Press JfcV'Hg, Stack I
Weather fyi<\l^f~
Factor
>ress^Hg
°F, W/D ~ , W/S — '
Sample Box No. ' — ~ Meter Box
No, ^5
Meter A 1 1@ £. b$ Pitot Corr. ' Factor<9.££,
Nozzle Dia,$.-;2^in, , Probe Length Q ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/ — ^ /
5
-\
^
£
Distance
from End
of Port
(in) V
•*dKS
$
I/
f
^
Diameter jyQ .in
Area '"Jl"t2
Clock
Time
6-00
,
Sketch of Stack
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
1*00*0
bc&r/1. 3
2>-2i» 4
6<2.7» J
i»3^i«6
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
O^3_
Q.2&
&±33>
£)^z>il
_O-^4
0.41
&•(*&
Ofr]')L>
[ 4 I
Meter
Orifi
Press
Calc.2
0.&9
O. $7
& *$£)
Ov&fT
ff\ Cttf'
h 3JD
1 *3.Q
/ ^ o CJ
O ^J ^
Mat'l Processing Rate
Fa
Ir
Tc
Me
Si
Oi
Te
R«
jial Gas Meter Reading 7^?^? *_ 4
>isture in Silica Gel J2.
.lica Gel Container NoJ^/j^
-sat: C02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
o
24-1
O
7?^
jst Conducted By:
*
;marks :
ce
.Diff.
0)
Actual
o.$q
&,$7
£)• 90
\o.4^
O..qg
I. ID
l.ZO
[tgO
2;7D
Stack Gas
Temp ,
/7o
/ 70
\^1 G
1 10
I "70
) 7O
110
no
7
/
O. Al
Pj.'l^C
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
f°F
In
£<£
sn
$~*\ '
#4
-83 '
""^r t\
O ' -2
&$Q
*J&
Out
#7
VI
1 lL
fft^
ts
If.
oyu.
IST
iS
3 /'-2
15" ft3
£> ft3 A
0 ml^T
ua^^gfT
„ Filter No, 72.- A?3
\<2_N
LiTie-VU
j
4.C
0.
o
/O
i
3
9
jS
^
/CL
N?
Last
Impimpr
Temp .
70
^7
bty
lp 9
%?
7^
%
rjO
?o
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Huj
_^-Z_
4.D
4J,
41
tf.^L.
£,0
s5+£e—
*£/]_,
12. 1 2~i
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
£>
7
$
9
Jo
•
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
.
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
te$ A
6> 44. 4
<4j5o. £>
£v5 (oA
IO(DI « 7
w^c? < /
&74. I
^g^.o
£87.0
£>^3« 9
Stack
Velocity
Mead
.("H2°>
\.io
l.ln
D.efc
IJO
IJO
I./D
L10
/ .30
1 *£&
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. C'H20)
Cal.
370
JL2&
2..4S
2-3Q
irj ^7^\
^O-* / \J
&M
Actual
^-70
2.70
3*40
Z.yd
2.7$
.2 -£01
320 2.70
2,9
2 tff\
£] ft
3-7
5-.-9
3.Z&
<3'-7
v^^
Stack Gas
Temp,
170
/ 9£>
170
1~10 .
110
£70
ho
/70
(7£>
170
/?/) '
,
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
73
73
79
x7^
rjg
)o
po
91
$1
pk>
Out
73
j)£>
So
$1
#/
&}
•it
%3
£fr\
IOQ
/d3
Sample
Box
Temp.
^
^
(f>
/2,
^3
9
/S"
to
/JL
^
^
/^
Last
Impinger
Temp ,•
70
73~
75
%
7^
$0
go
79
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
/^L.S
J3~ls
/Z.P
/y.z
13*8
/£,.£,
14 ^
jj^y-
79 !/5~.£
7^70
/o^
3.i*$
2.1-$
. i
!
-------
Plant
n
1
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location x^ .
Temp. _ °F, W/D
<=> r
, W/S
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No,
Meter AHQ A £.. Pitot Corr. Factor . $•
Nozzle Dia. ]/,/ in., Probe Length 5*^ ft
Probe Heater Setting /eg" ^^ _
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter 5~¥- in
Inside Area ft?
Height ft
Sketch of Stack
D '
j
— ^f
c"^) * —
\ c? o o 0
-
— -^- rf
7a~
} f~^r
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in
Moisture in Silica Gel
' ft5
J £••
Silica Gel Container No. 2.
Orsat: C00
Filter No.
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
^ |T>. •., g.-
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
1
2.
JTi
Lf-
~
*•*
$
7
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
5^^
<=— - Jr
/J-
'^"^/^7
^ >/'^
f's> ^^
1 2- ^/<4-
/<
Clock
Tijne
A.
t/;77'
./ j ,?3 ^
i ¥'£
4L,7
Gas xMeter
Reading
(ft^)
^ 6 - ><" 7*^
/, ^^^>^
•7 C?. ^
7 <^ 2_-— -•
~^5. v;5
S/
.
o ' t/iL.
/).- ^6-
0' S "7
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
f'H^O")
Calc.'
t& 4
$ ' 'f&
• /. -^/^
/ /'
t. ^
/ . '-*-'&
1 1 \4^
i / a&
Actual
.
/ / /b
(• '?-/i*
'/' ll 1
'/. ;. <
/" ,<<5
/ •• M \7
•/V?
/-• ^/O
/-- 7C
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/£&
i_l £ ^
1 6 O
V/ &
t £ 2-
1 h J~
I C ?--
l/*f
Gas Sample
Temp.Q Dry
Gas Meter
r°p
In
/&*•/
j j-1^
"7/z ^
•'^.•^
-/a ^
M jL_
~) °>IK
/.
ItfS'
Out
/i>s>
/C^Z>
/«^
//3<^
//O
'/Z- 1
Sample
Box
Temp.
L(°F)
^ .
^r—
, —
"— ~~
.
• —
Last
Impin^pr
Temp.
(°F1
s~
rs ,
'i? >'
c><^~
^^
4{ ^
^ />
?' '•?:
. % ^
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg) -
^-o
/ 't
fa< ^
d. .O
A'>".
fc -^
£-j'f
(> ^
^7 jsr*"^
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/£>
It
/2_
/3
jLj.
/'*>
/£
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
3%
iff •'/<£
(f-%?Sr
fj-£>y?
^f 'y?
52>
<7 ^'
^
Clock .
Time
^-36
V:: DO
,^cf>
;,'. /r
/; ^^
(
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
*(
// 3 - /
r?^' ^
/ ^
/•^j. fl .
/ 3 4 / V
" / ;V - ?
/^--^ ^5^7
Stack
Velocity •
Head
,>- S"V
# &<$&
€>..£<>
&• (* '/
£? i <^
dz.ffib
5,yS^ ^
Meter.
Orifice
. Press. Diff.
("H20) ^/
idaf.
/ *\^
***) * *~7
A r^i
ft 1
~$'&
i^g>
^,<§
Actual
'/*&
2-7
(
/. -T'S/
/' 7^
;y,..0
'2 '4
Stack Gas
Temp,
/£/
//? 'JL^
' / S' T(
/ ^fr
/ ^ Y
''bo
/ "^ ^
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
. (°F)
In
/jr^
/&
i
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING
Plant
Sampling Location
Date /..2//.V/7/
Time Start
Sampling Time/Point
°F, WB
DB
Moistui e/$$ % , FDA#£. Gas Density Factor
/ ^
Barometric Press V^ "Hg, Stack PressjWig
V.'eather <£Vev C*$*
Temp._ _ °F, W/D _ ,
Sample Box No. Meter Bex
Meter4.ua @,t,Q Pitot Ccrr. Factor
Nozzle Dia.&^ln., Probe Length ffi ft
Probe Heater Setting _ b &AQ. __
Stack Dimensions: Inside Pi amete r ^4 J-n
ft
'lnsi.de Area
Height
it2
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
ft-1
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container N
Orsat: CO-
ml
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
Remarks:
Filter
gm
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
,01
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.? Dry
Gas Meter
f°Fl
Sirnple
Box
Temp ,
Last
Vacuiun
en
Sample
Train
("liy")
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/e?
}(
/>
J~$
w
I ^
. /to
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
/
&$.?%
if/ fa
a* /••&
•3' ?<
O^j
•* • '."c
*~J ' -S
,
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
3)1. &
P-H^
a -2v 7
i
"J •? ~? "2\
J— > )• — >
?4o<<
• _-^«
^ v^ 5-4^
v
Stack
Velocity
Head
.("H2
c-9fc.
A 2-
A-/
v-W
^-.^
/-^
^74^
/
! /
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
..C'H20)
Cal.
7-5
5^-c^
^9-
a<^
^,^
a^
5-^
Actual
-2-3
^•c
>^-gr
7>
'?•£
7.C-
"}^{
\
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
/r^
/^
/r^
/c^
/ -^
;Yd7
If &
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter-
(°F)
In
fry
M
iw
/•^'i
'&
;w
/:5^"
Out
y^
/^<
//^
///
V*-
'iri
lit
Sample
Box
Temp-.
C°F)
Last
Impinger
Tempi
(°F)
4*
97-
72-
70
.•v7^
7°
7?
' X
Vacuum
on
Sample-
Train
("Hg) .
//'°
/v r
^- -
//- o
v^. ^
9 o • ^
^^ ,CH
-------
Plant
SOURCE~SajWL1NU FI£LD"DATA" SHEET
Sampling Location
Date
Time
Run No.
'*& Time End
Sampling Time/Point
DB _ °F, IVB _ °F, VF @ DP
"Hg
J-bisture_i ,FI)A_Gas Density Facto r_ _
Barometric Press'tJ^Z-llg, Stack PrcssJ^Hg
We a tiie r
Ten-p. ___ °F, W/D _ ;, W/S
Sam^ile Box No. Meter Box No,
Meter &H3j
Xozzle
Pitot Corr. Factor
n., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside Area
Height
Sketch of Stack
/, /• :'X /
,« V
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter . ReadingcJT'ffil
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Imping'
Moisture in Silica Gel g | /..!_ -
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C02
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
n
it 2
ft
Remarks:
on
Sample
Train
bas Meter
Reading
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
fror.i End
of Port
fin)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H0)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.-
Vacuum
on.
Sample
Train
("Hg)
-------
SOURCE S/WRNGTT5LD TKT& SHEET
ZV^L_
*b
Sampling Time/Point
F, VF @ DP
"Hg
DB /Sa^ °F, WB
hbi/ture./JJ_%,FDAjfiy,Gas DeraityFactor^Jb"*
Barometric Pres:i£|££"HS> Stack Presiding
Weather
Te;!?p.
F, V.'/D
W/S
Sample Box No. «f Meter Box No,
Meter A113 /ffitA, Pitot Coir. Factor »•
Nozzle Dia.«^s5^in,, Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
It
Stack Dimensions: Inside DiameterO
-------
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3j
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff
("H20)
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp;
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
Last
Impinger
Temp.-
of Port
(in)
J&&UL
-------
ant
jnpling
,te_
me Start
Time End
impling Time/Point
, VF @ DP
• "Hg
_^^^ —•j- ~~~"^~~ ^^ _^tt&
>istuicXj %>FDAHJfrGas DensityFactory.^^
iroraetric P_res:3£?:"Hg, Stack PrestV"!Ig
ather
5F, U'/D
imple Box No.
A!!^^>SL
jzzle
Meter Box No=
Co i r. Facto r
in,, Probe Length it
"obe Heater Setting
:ack Dimensions: Inside Diametert^T^ in
Inside Area ft2
Height " ft
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate '
Final Gas Meter Reading /33
Initial Gas Meter Reading
ft3
"ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container
Orsat: C02
°2
CO
•ml •...
&
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
>rt and
•averse
)int No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
f°F)
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Inpingar
'Tcinp,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
Pert and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from. End
of Port
(in).
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sajnple
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Sanple
Box
Temp.
Last
Inipinger
Tenp,-
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
-------
I'iLJUD JMBPSHLLi
Plant
''/] " Sampling Location
Date
Run
Time Start/ffgff __ Time End
Sampling Time/ Point <^ ffl/fl/
VF @ DP
"Hg
Moisture ft 7% ,FD/^.gGas Density Factor
Barometric PressjJgJ'Hg, Stack
We a the r
Sample Box No. *"f. Meter Box No,
Mcter &\\§/•&&-. Pitot Corr. Factor*
u, Probe Length
ft
Nozzle Dia.
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside DiaiTieterjjT^? in
Inside Area ~ it2
Height ft
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading /J^>
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: CO- O
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
o
Test Conducted.By:
fk
Remarks
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
fin)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
,01
Stack Gas
Temp ,
C°F)
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
'F
San^lc
Box
Tenro ,
Last
ft
ml
gm
Filter No,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hgj
-------
'ort and
'raverse
'oint No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H0)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
Sample
Box
Temp-.
Last
Ijnpinger
Temp^
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
j ' '
'• Sampling Location/^.^./P
Date /3L//&f?/ Run No,
Time Start /£?' '' -N Time End
Sampling Time/Points. ^ r^ \ /,' <•, • ': Si ->. •' _
DB mO °F, 1VB lQ0 °F, VF @ DP £^ "Hg
Moisture1
Density F
ol£p*
Barometric Pres^2_"Hg> StackT^e^S _ ^I
feather
Te!;-
°F, Iv/D — , 1V/S —
Sample Pox Xo._ / Meter Box No, ^
J ^» » , * 1 ^*^
Meter AH8_, Pitot Corr.
Nozzle Dia- Y2*
/&,
//a
S'imple
Box
Temp «
Last
Impingjr
Teinp ,
C°F)
V'aciiLmi
on
Sample
Train
("Hq)
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from 12nd
of Port
(in) -
Clock
Time
. Gas Meter
Reading
(£t3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20).
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp ,
C°F)
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp ,•
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING TIELD JGATA bill:!:!'
Plant
i
Sampling LocationA/?,/?
Date
Time Start
Sampling Ti
«.»_
3F, WB
Moisturej#2 I, FDA>% Gas Density Factor,
Barometric Pres^#"Hg, Stack Press
Weather
Sample Box
Meter Ail
7 '
/"
;\0. I
W/S
Meter Box No.
i
Pitot Cozr. Factor
in,, Probe Length
It
Nozzle Dia.K^ i
Probe Heater Setting """""''
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diametcr^^ .in
Inside AreaVy./2SS*'it2
.Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impinfers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: CO,, '/5
F1-3
t-t
°2
CO
Excess
Air
Height
Test Conducted By:
Remarks:
f/
and
:rsc
?/
/ j
S
•5
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
~A/«I
*J&T
Clo'
Tinu
/"
4^
/'<'
/•W*-
».l
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Mead
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
2.
Gas Sample
Temp.g Dry
Gas Meter
1°F
Box
Temp,
Last
inpingsr
\'acuum
on
Sample
Train
C'llcj
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port.
(in)
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft 3)
Head
("H 0)
Press,Diff.
C"H20)
-------
SOURCE SAMPETNG FIELD DATA 'SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date
Time Startj£_/,£g
No,
Time End
Sampling Timc/Point_
m/M
F, V/B — °F, VF @ DP
"Hg
Bare-metric Press
weather
I, Stack Pre%sr'"Hg
, W/D
Sample Box No. _ /_
Meter Box No=
Meter AI1C3 A^y^Pitot Corr. Factor^j
Nozzle Dia._/S£_in,, Probe Length $ it
Probe Heater Setting **"''
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside Area
Height
tch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Readin
f-+l
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel ^QQ
%$$* ft3
Silica Gel Container No. //&/ Filter ^^
Orsat: CO.
Q2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
o
Test Conducted By:
i t _^>—*
U^L
f\
n
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point Xo.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
&//
Gas Meter
Reading
9
$
* * 3 "3 I 7i
a-
Stack
Velocity
Head
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
_J"I-LO]
Calc -. | Actual
/'
••
T^rr^
Stack Gas
Temp ,
Gas Siimple
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sar.inle
Box' .
Temp ,
TO
Last
Impimpr
Teup .
Vacuum
on
Saiiiple
Train
C"Hg)
JO^,
10*0
-T
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H0)
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp .
Last
Tmpinger
Temp.-
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
-------
\>
Plant
It
Sampling Location
Date
SOURCE SAMPLIlCTlELlTTglTAWET
tt/0"
No.
Time Start
Time End
.ing Time/Point^>.5./>7e/7 £> /fif^-ll' ~7 _
DB -— °F, WB — °F, VF @ DP *-*• "Hg
Ito i s tur e/ffijSf, FD^f.^Gas Dens ity Fac tor
«S*^X*^
Barometric Pressffig)"Hg, Stack Prefs^/Hg
We a the r (^J^^Lf*"
. W/S
'lenp.jj^/_j_-F, W/D_
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No=
ft
Meter AH@ /. 7<2» pitot Corr. Factor^'j^
Nozzle Dia. f^in-., Probe Length_
Probe Heater Setting ^Jr$S@
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
• Inside Area
Height
Sketch of Stack
\
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container N
Orsat: CO-
_£t^
ft3
ml
Filter
°2
CO
1N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
Remai-ks :
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from L:nd
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack •
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
, C"H90)
Calc.1
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp . @ Dry
Gas Meter
f'F)
In
Out
Simple
Box
Temp .
Last
impintpr
Temp .
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("HgJ
a,_
a./
^a_
HL
£0
&33L
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
Gas Sample
Temj3 . 0 Dr>-
Gas Meter
C°F)
Sample
Box
Tc;np.
C°F)
Last
Impinger
Ter-.o.-
Vacuum
en
Sa-.ple.
Train
("Hg)
-------
FIEnTDAlA SHEET
Plant
• «*
Sampling Location ^
Date A'-.. / ':-, / ; / / Run No. Q»
Time Start /; tffa Time End.^/</// '
DB °F, UrB }!&/ °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Nb i s t ur 0^,5! , Fl X'^^^Gas Dais ity Fac to r
Barometric Pressjgff "Hg, Stack Press^Pflg'''
Ife a the r (L/^GL f~*
Ten;p. °F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No,
Meter AH§ yL7*^» Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia- yy in,, Probe Length ^ ft
t&^
Probe Heater Setting 4^^
Sketch of Stack
/
_i
f\ f»
^ \^
^ &
V
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
in
It 2
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
ft3
Silica Gel Container No.
Or sat: OX
Filter Xu-
CO
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
Stack Gas
Temp .
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
f°Fl
Sample
Box-
Temp .
Last
Irnpincpr
Temp.
•Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
("H0)
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
Sample Last
-------
Plant
SOURCE~5MPLiNli HEED"DATA~5HEET
Sampling Location_
Date D--CI. 2.O, lc;7
Run No.
Time Start
Time End
Sampling Time/Point '
°F, WB _ °
DB
F, VF @ DP
"Hg
MoisturoflO %,FD.'||J,Gas Density Factor
Barometric PressJjlff "Hg, Stack
We athe r Cslt&^
Temp. fffcX$ ° F, 1V/D _
Sample Box No. Meter Box No,
Meter AI13
, W/S
Corr. Factor^.
Nozzle Dia, (^ in,, Probe Length <& ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter fe@ in
Inside Area Ft2
llcielit ' ft
Sketch of Stack
\ ...
v*
*
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers_
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat:
Test Conducted By:
Remarks:
Filter
ft
ml
: C00 4?
^ g&3
CO O
N2 ^Z_
/
Excess
Air
Port and
Traverse
Point >.'o.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
Stack Gas
Temp .
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
Box/
... \/
iCi'..
Last.
inipimpr
Te;r,p .
CFJ
Vacuum
on
Sa-nple
Train
("Hg)
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from L:nd
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H0)-
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
("H0)
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
Gas Sample
Teinp.S Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp .-
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
"/) '•
Plant
Sampling Location
Date f?.--U-?{
Time Start
Sampling
DB °F, WB
Moistur
Sketch of Stack
Run No.
Time End
>F,.VF @ DP
"Hg
Dens ity Fac to r_
Barometric Press,^^ "Hg, Stack PressjgPHg
A ' . — G—
Weather
Temp.
°F, W/D
Sample Box No. _
Meter A HI
VJ/S
; *>/ >.J
Meter Box No.
Nozzle Dia
Pitot Corr. Factor
«•
in,, Probe Length
ft
Probe Heater Settin
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter 5 /^ in.
Inside Area 7.^7 ft 2
Height _ ft
\ v -,>,
\U ' O .;
Mat'l Processing Rate_
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate^in
Moisture in /Silica Gel ^ r
Silica Gel Container Ito.ZflO Filter
Orsat:
CO,
^
°2
CO
N
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
/? . U3 » C < CM/
Remai'ks:
f t
gm
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°FJ
Gas Sample
Teinp.S Dry
Gas Meter •
r-F,
Sarq)le
Box
Temp.
(CF)
Last
Jnipingar
Temp.
Vac i:
o
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff „
C"H0)
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
Gas Siunple
Terap.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp .
C°F)
Last
Inipinger
Temp ;
acuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg).
-------
SOURCE
.HEED~DATA~SFIEET
Plant
Sampling
Date
Time Start
Sarrpling Time
DB °F, KB
'^/Sketch of Stack
Moisture I, FDA
Barometric Press,
Weather
°F, VF @ DP
, Gas Density Factor
»K_"Hg» Stack Pres
Hg
°F, W/D
Sample Box No.
Meter &II&
w/s
Meter Box No,
Nozzle Dia,
Pitot Corr. Factor_
in'-, Probe Length
ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside-Diameter
Inside Area
Height .
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading_
nitial Gas Metei* Readir
n/ftt^l&Pj **{£ jlrsjTt*
'fotal Condensate in Imp infers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container ?
ml
gm
Filter No,
Or sa
C00
i,
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
0 j
Test Conducted By:
•
in
Port and
Ti averse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(inj
Clock
Tbne
Gas Meter
Reading
(f
Stack
(Velocity
Head •
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
0)
Temp ,
Stack Gas
Temp <
Gas Si'impl e
Temp.3 Dry
Gas Meter
12LL.
Sanple
Bex
Temp ,
Last
Vac i ami
on
Sample
Train ,
C'Hg)
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(JEt3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Saiple
Box
Temp.
Last
Jinpinger
Ter.ip ,-
Vacuum
en
Sar.vple
Train
("Hg)
-------
.it
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
ampling Locati
Date
Run No.
Time Start_^g0C!F_ Time End
Sampling Time/Point
VF @
H
Density Factor
Barometric Press,. y£?"Hg, Stack Presgffi"Hg
Weather
W/D
, W/S
Sample Box No. «3u Meter Box No._
Meter AH5/» 7<0 Pitot Coir. Factor
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Twie
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"Hp)
Stack Gas
Temp .
Gas Sample
Ternp.S Dry
Gas Meter
Sainpte
Box
Temp .
C°F)
Last
Inrpinger
Tenip -•
C°F)
Vacuum
on
Saiv.ple
rain
C'Hg)
-------
AMMONIA EMISSIONS
-------
SAMPLING DATA SHEET FOR
Plant
Remarks
Run No.
Date
Time of Sample
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Meter Volume Sampled @ Meter Cond., Ft3
Average Meter Temperature, °F
Average Stack Temperature, °F
Average Meter Vacuum, "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH, "H20
Observed Sampling Rate, LPM
Gas Volume Sampled, Ft3, Dry, 70°F, .29.92 "Hg
/
/?-/^- ?/
Jti^f/typ^
f(j&3 **~fr(a'&
^!&____
Z3
Q//» 7/1
o®B.4>&^
3* 2$%
gg
ff \a?
/& s
0/4. B%&
Oil. ~?%&
3.0W>
@3
170
_
—
& 9
& o /
3. $3 Z
3
/%-%&'?/
2® /g *?&<$£
3®
Z^
@/7> 73 /
@$4>,$%4
2.927
8£
170
—
—
^ &
&. e G2
2.BS3
Calculations:
-------
SAMPLING DATA SHEET FOR
Remarks
Stack
ft
Run No.
Date
Time of Sample
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Meter Volume Sampled @ Meter Cond., Ft3
Average Meter Temperature, °F
Average Stack Temperature, °F
Average Meter Vacuum, "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH, "H20
Observed Sampling Rate, LPM
Gas Volume Sampled, Ft3, Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
/
/?-/&-?/
tfyO-t '930
20 ,
B^7
/&. &&®
/g&4?0
2,^70
//B
/&&
—
@.@7
•*% &*
€-0 &>
Z^BO
1
/Z-/8-7/
/6>$£-/y9o
$®
lf»7
%g®, @$®
/0$
Z. 9$$
/*Z
/30
«=,
@>©&
*^> x5^
&>* 0
Z.BQ&
3
/2-£0-7/
g®$®-2//&
30
29.7
3g3>g&£
Sf^ jfa ^ + *tf
SQ*S&*H
3e ^^a
//s
/£/
—
€>»&&
*7 A
&, o C?
5? "7 tg &
Gx>» f •££ &
Calculations:
-------
SAMPLING DATA SHEET FOR
Plant
Remarks
Stack
/0 ft
Run No.
Date
Time of Sample
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Meter Volume Sampled @ Meter Cond,, Ft3
Average Meter Temperature, °F
Average Stack Temperature, °F
Average Meter Vacuum, "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH, "H20
Observed Sampling Rate, LPM
Gas Volume Sampled, Ft3, Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
L/
/£-/&-?/
/900- /$$&
_J^L_j
2BJ
&rt dL^y
f(^)> T^%5>^
&$> ^ ^^
j^ &f3^,f
*% /$<&.
t-^ • f %g? f^
__M_^
/ «
«£fl XX
^ <£f
~~»
f3=ZK»
3*®
3.@&§
2
/Z-/8-W
J&00-/&6
SO
Z&.l
/#& £3®
97.4*0
3./30
•76
///
^.
—
3. a
S./03
3
«ns?
/g-ZO-7/
30
ZBJ
/03. £$®
/#<0.^g&
3.0/&
S3
///
_
—
a. 8
^.9^9
Calculations:
-------
SAMPLING DATA SHEET FOR
Plant
Remarks
Stack
Run No.
Date
Time of Sample
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Meter Volume Sampled @ Meter Cond,, Ft3
Average Meter Temperature, °F
Average Stack Temperature, °F
Average Meter Vacuum, "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH, "H20
Observed Sampling Rate, LPM
Gas Volume Sampled, Ft3, Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
/
/t-/& - ?/
W09-I93Q
30
Z$.?_
^m&^m.
0®Q> &f&
£.$/£>
$0
/4>®
—
—
*9 "^
^o /
•9 16? //
^. &>f/
^
2
/%-/$-?/
/6®3-/&33
30
£2*2— ^
J022&L
A A "5 ^ f
g/iy ^» .&&(a>
Calculations:
-------
SAMPLING .DATA SHEET FOR
Plant
Remarks
USU-j.
Stack
Run No.
Date
Time of Sample
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Meter Volume Sampled @ Meter Cond., Ft3
Average Meter Temperature, °F
Average Stack Temoerature, °F
Average Meter Vacuum, "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH, "H20
Observed Sampling Rate, LPM
Gas Volume Sampled, Ft3, Dry, 70°F, 29.92 "Hg
/
&/&-?/
/q&$»zotg
30
28. 7
&§&. @7B
•S> '£?'%. &
«,?• *3><3 <£>
9§
/%4
^
& &&>
•s ^
^KS^O <£»
•2 J*f ®
J% / /&
1
/£-/$»?/
/&/£-/&$$
30
^0» r
6o/, 3/B
4,$@7
//o
/0O
~-
&,O£>
3®
* C5*
^ 772
,^0 e e tt>»
3
/g-£0-y/
%®%®-%Q$t
30
Z8.7
732.7S&
7Z8*H/&
3,$@Z
/23
93
—
0.06
~% *7
*m?0 f
•2 <•
-------
SAMPLING .DATA SHEET FOR
Plant C»/T C (tyQtiQIC.® /Ji , */t$C. Stac
e*'
Remarks . <$®iv>^/e,€/ ^v *J© ' £t
if ^J
Run No.
Date
Time of Sample
Barometric Pressure, "Hg
Stack Pressure, "Hg
Final Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading, Ft3
Meter Volume Sampled @ Meter Cond.-, Ft3
Average Meter Temperature, °F
Average Stack Temoerature, °F
Average Meter Vacuum, "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH, "H20
Observed Sampling Rate, LPM
Gas Volume Sampled, Ft3, Dry, 70°F, 29.92.."Hg
k U&r^
* 0*/A
/
12-/&-?/
/$4i-/m
3®
_^
O/&* <$-£$
®@7e$®o
3.@@®
fff
/74
—
—
8,7
^ \ ijjrwr*
9P~
1
/&'/&?/
/&/-/W
3@
Z$
Qf& ®£Q
a/©. £@®
3.330
& i€?
& &
/7/
—
_
3.3
3.&&Z
W /f
3
/Z-&-7/
/9/%-fi?>&
SO
29
Q/&« $&@
0/4. /OC
(<^t fc£(Q$
9B
/73
—
—
2»&
Z.&&&
Calculations:
-------
APPENDIX C
Standard Analytical Procedures
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to
Attn of:
Date: 12-21-72
: Summary of FluorJde Analysis
*7"*
"' R." Neulicht, EMB, IRL
This memorandum is in response to your request for a brief
summary of our SPADNS-Zirconium Lake procedure for determination
of fluoride in stack emission samples.
Samples received in our laboratory are filtered through
fluoride free paper filters to yield water soluble and water insoluble
portions. The water insoluble particulate collected on the filter
is rinsed throughly to be sure that all water soluble fluoride is
rinsed through. The water soluble fraction is distilled from sul-
furic acid to a maximum temperature of 180 C. If chloride is suspected
in the sample Ag^So is added to the still. SPADNS solution is added
to an aliquot of"the distillate and the absorbance is read at 570 nm.
The concentration of the sample is determined from a calibration curve
prepared from standard fluoride solutions. It is very imoortant that
the temperature of the samples be the same as that of the standards
when absorbances are recorded.
The water insoluble fraction of the sample is evaporated to dry-
ness in the presence of a slurry of CAO, and then fused with NAOH. The
fusate is dissolved with distilled water, neutralized with dilute H So ,
distilled and analyzed as described for the soluble portion.
Paper filters containing particulate are cut into small pieces,
suspended in a slurry of CAO, evaporated to dryness and ashed prior
to the alkali fusion and distillation.
If you have any questions about this procedure, let me know.
Howard I,. Crist
Chief, Source Sample Analysis Section
SSFAB, OAEML
cc: R. E. Lee
-------
Ammonia Determination Summary by
Modified Kjeldahl Distillation
• . An aliquot of sample containing no more than 10 mg ammonia is
I • °
| ° added to a Kpeldahl distillation assembly that has been cleaned out
i,' ' • • •
"j ' • by distillation of ammonia-free distilled water'for thirty minutes.
I Additional water is added, if necessary, to bring the volume in the
j flask to 150 ml. Phenolphthalein indicator is added and a solution
I ' ' '
j of sodium hydroxide-sodium thiosulfate is added dropwise until the
1 '. ' • '
j sample is basic to phenclphthalein. A phosphate buffer is then added
.j to maintain a pH of 7.4.
; . The cample is heated until 100 ml of distillate is collected in'
2 percent boric acid containing an indicator. »
The distillation is continued using fresh 2 percent boric sol-
j " • ution and distillate is collected until there is no color change of
-i
.; the boric acid. . .
The boric acid containing the ammonia is then titrated with
i • -
i standard sulfuric acid.
-------
Phosphorous Pentoxide Determination
Colorimetric Molybdovanadophosphate Method
An aliquot of sample is hydrolyzed in the presence of HCl and
• HNO acids by boiling almost to dryness.
» • i
The sample is cooled to room temperature, transferred to a
250 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water.
A 20 ml aliquot is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask, 20 ml
of molybdovanadate reagent is added and the flask is diluted to
volume.
The absorbance of the yellow color is determined after ten min-
utes at 400 nm. The concentration of phosphorous pento::ide is de-
termined from a calibration curve prepared with standard solutions.
-------
APPENDIX D
Laboratory Results
-------
/ . • : ; E y'1RONMENTAL PROTECTION AC""NCY
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to
AilnoJ: Date: 2/4/72
Subject: Fluoride Analysis Central Farmers Chemical Inc.
To: .Mr. Jerome J. Rom
Emission Testing Branch
Division of Applied Technology
THROUGH: Mr. Howard Crist
SSAS, SSFAB, DAS
Attached is the Fluoride Data for the Central Farmer
Chemical Inc. The water soluble fluoride was done by
sulfuric acid distillation .followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM
Lake Method.
• The products were fussed uith NaOH followed by sul-
furic acid distillation then by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM Lake
Method.
rtst- €
C'C-£- t"*' *-"
Allen E. Riley
Source Sample Analysis
Section, SSFAB, DAS
;^j Attachment
.•i . c'c: R. Lampe
••1 J. McGinnity
'.] J. Reynolds
i " D. von Lehmden
•j R. E. Lee, Jr.
-------
-3-
231 PF
240 PF.
241
242
243
244
245
328
248
329
249
330
250
331
251
332
252
333
253
254 "
255 "
263 "
256 "
298
270 ~
271 "
272 ",
273 "
339 "'
274
338
FLUORIDE DATA
Central Farmer Chemical
jSTATlPJi PH
t-
Gaseous F
Total Sample
Filter
Total Sample
Filter
Total Sample 1
Filter J
*~*r
Total Sample
Filter
Total Sample J
Filter j
Total Sample J
Filter J
Reactor Scrubber
' :H 0 Inlet
L
P
n
i «
30% Phos. Acid
54% Phos. Acid
DAP Product
HO Blank
2 -v
Probe V-7ash I
Impinger f «•
Filter J
Total Sample ~)
r 1C
Filter ' f
Total Sample ] ,
Filter ? L
+~J
2.5
3.3
5.8 mg/Sample
8.8 mg/Sample
0.77 Mg/Sampl«
0.20 mg/Sample
0.38 mg/Sample
143 mg/Sample
©7 mg/Sample
154 mg/Sample
2.4 mg/Sample
34 mg/Sample
2.8 mg/Sample
20.3 g/L
19.7 g/L
28.4 g./L
13.6 g/L
22.7 mg/g
19 |a.g/120 ml
.71 mg/Sample
147 mg/Sample
91. mg/Sample .
-------
-4-
FLUORIDE DATA
Central Farmer Chemical
PH
275 PF
342 "
276 "
337 "
277 "
341 "
278 "Ji
279 " ^
Total Sample
Filter
Total Sample j
Filter J
Total Sample
Filter 1
N
280 "
281 "
282 "
299 "
346 "
301 "
345 "
302 "
347 "
303 "
348 "f9
^
336 "
s.
304 "3
305 "
306 "
307 "
308 "
349 "
309 "
g
gone
Reactor Scrubber #2
#1
H?° Inlet
:
310
Reactor Scrubber #2
HO Inlet
(-
Inlet
2.8
3.3
3.4
5.2
8.1 rag/Sample
25 mg/ Sample
4.6 . mg"/Samp I e.
20.7 g/L
21.6 g/L
15.5 g/L
22.0 mg/g
25. M-g/187 ml
319 mg/Sample
57 mg/Sample
22.6 mg/Sample
1.2 mg/Sample
" 31 mg/Sarnple
2.7 mg/sample
15.6 g/L
9.6 g/L
-------
FLUORIDE DATA
Central Farmer Chemical
311 I
312f)
313S
326
gone 30% Phos. Acid
54 % "
DAP-Product
H 0 Blank
2
14.7 g/L
22.0 mg/g
18 p.g/240 ml
-------
' •''.''' /?*\
• .,.,-.,.. .. ... ^XJVIRONM1INTAL PROTECTION LJENCY
Rese? -~h Triangle Park, North C; lina 27711
Reply to ' . . . ;•• ' .-'''''' •••'•••
Attn(>f: . . ..•; ... :. ' * . Dae: 2/15/72
Subject: Fluoride Analysis, ' Central Farmer Chemical Inc.
To: .Mr. Jerome J. Rom ' . . • . .
Emission Testing Branch '• ' ..' ' •
Division of J-.pplied Technology . .. '.-,"
'•'._ " .THROUGH: Mr. Kcvrsrd Crist . ••'"'.. ... / '..
' . SS.-'.S, SSFA3, DJ.S ' . . ' . .
Attached is the fluoride data for Central Farmer
Chemical Inc. 'Die water insoluble were first fussed
with HaOH follov.-ed by sulfuric acid distillation then
by the S?/.DNS-ZIRCONIUM Lake Method.
Source Ssnple Analysis
Section, SSFA3, DAS
Attachment
cc: R. Lanipe
J. McGinnity
J. Reynolds
D-. von Lehrnd an
R. Lee, Jr.
H. Crist
-------
CENTRAL FARMER CHEMICAp INC
Insoluble Fluoride
Number
250, 331
251, 332
252, 333
270, 271, 272
273, 339
274, 338
275, 342
276, 337 ..
277, 341
300, 346
302, 347
303, 348
336, 304, 305
306, 307
308, 349
245, 328
248, 329
249, 330
301, 345
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
' PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
r
66
30.2
0
20.3
0.77
50
0.42
18.5
71
54
15.3
0.21
17.6
51
21.4
0.67
' 62
7.3
p.g/Sample
__/C-~ — ,1 ~
iu^/ u<7iup.Le
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
yxg/ Sample
mg./ Sample
mg./ Sample
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
Hg/ Sample
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
mg/Sample
mg/ Sample
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to . .
Attn of: Date: 4/4/72
Subject: Determination of Ammonia in Stack Gas
"' Wr. Jerome J. Rom
Emission Testing Branch
Division of Applied Technology
Thru: Mr. Howard Crist, Chief,
Source Sample Analysis Section
Attached is the Ammonia Data for Central Farmer
Chemical Inc. The modified Kjeldahl distillation method
was used.
Allen E. Riley
Source Sample Analysis Section
SSFAB, DAS
cc: R. Lampe
J. McGinnity
J. Reynolds
D. von Lehmden
H. Crist
-------
AMMONIA DATA FOR CENTRAL FARMER CHEMICAL. INC.*
Run
1
2
3
Sample
Number
257 PF
258 "
259 "
260 "
261 "
262 "
283 "
284 "
285 "
286 "
287 "
288 "
314 "
315 "
316 "
317 "
318 "
319 "
Station
R
K
L
M
N
P
R
K
L
M
N
P
R
K
L
M
N
P
EPA Sample
ML
110
80
no
no
68
91
118
64
108
81
47
203
210
79
99
70
72
123
EPA
Mg/Sample
46.8
1.0
135.9
<0.03
16.8
1.2
1010.9
1.2
99.9
1.3
<0.03
0.9
230.0
0.2
128.0
0,7
0.1
0.2
Total Sample
ML
136
107
138
135
94
118
148
95
137
122
77
231
235
105
124
97
98 .
149
Total
mg/Sample
57.9
1.3
170.5
<.04
23.2
1.6
1267.9
1.8
126.7
2.0
<.05
1.0
257.4
0.3
160.3
1.0
0.1
0.2
*Samples were split with company
-------
Reseat ol
Reply to
Ann of: . '
O
Subject: Density at 76 F
PROTECTION AG-
V* ' 17
Park, North Cax-lina
27711
Dale: 2/29/72
• "Z-
To: Ktf. Jerome J. Rom
Emission Testing Branch
• THROUGH: Mr. Hov:ar<3 Crist
SSAS, SSFAB, DAS
Attached is the Density of the scrubber water samples
from Central 'Farmer Chemical Inc., which completes the
analysis of all samples. !
f. ,
Allen E. Rile/
Source Sample Analysis
. Section, SSF7\B, DAS
Attachment .
cc: Mr. R. Lampe
Mr. J. McGinnity
Mr. J. Reynolds
Mr. D. von Lehmden
Mr. H. Crist
i.?^t^1-1^.e^
-------
1
:|
>,N
. 'V
-J,
1
'""
':•••
$
.':;
'•\|
V?
/y
-X
-'vj
•''v
3
1
VJ
.-'?
^
1
s\
1
*
'1
:'|
.f
.*
?;
-------
ir.pling Date xr
• •r>fl/>i I
.| HO.pay I
(Must be 'filled out for ench "tent run)
.DUSTRY
)MP ANY
JDRESS •
J-!?LI
:THOD
r irst; inenc.
No. Used
fJi". t .LClCnt.
No. Used ' '3O I /^/^
. 'I' C / ?,
Test No. ">•* " <- ' •''
Run No.- '
RUCD.
'C. F.
Tnble^O
UNIT PROCESS/OPERATION
.AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ' .
FUEL USED
INLET Q . • ' '
• GAS VOLUME SAM
lormY) & P
cc-nrs TO
r. o.
lent. No.
/ 7^ /'A
l^ufF
lltfr
WSfr
?-/r.^/-
^7///-
^7 }/'/=
J ^ ./v^
:> /? / /*/-
C^'-'MEKTS:
Description of
' Sairiole or Samnle •
Fraction
*
• . -
"
,
•
wt?omr
(Solid)
Tnrf
,lo
vol.
(Liquid)
ml
Analysis Rooucfited - General Comments
(ooorox. concentr^tions-ponsible interferences
etc .) (Indicate specific nnnlysis on bockside)
Fx&cr . '
«| .t
/ \
• *
' t
« /
' <
' »
f
SAMPLING . . •''/"?? tf * REQUEST
-rnwrparTOT? Ppn.TF.rT OFPTCP.? /-/I/ ? U< J^~<- J6?- • -DinrT"--ri py . . 1
(if applicable) .*"
••-•DATE ANALYSIS REQUESTED
t.
-------
Sampling Date'
INDUSTRY
COMPANY
ADDRESS
SAMPLING
METHOD
(Must be filled out for each 'test run)
r irsx; loent.
No. Used j
Last .Locnt.
No. Used ' "^O /
72, C I £
Test No. 7 ?- £/ 7
Run No.
RECD.
.><-^- *C&35 ~7~.
USG T.able A)
UNIT PROCESS/OPERATION
.AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
FUEL USED
INLET n •
_ ' GAS VOLUME SAMPLED-
RCIID. _Z
p. O.
Ident. No.
173. f F
\C?t}fp{=
'2 j^fF
r* *v ^ * /""*
St • t £? S} >—
7. 7 / //-
^73^/r
? Ft' f^
"5 /? / f/~
COX-MENTS:
Description of
Soin'ole or Sample .
Fraction
•
^
• • -
/
/
/
/
wt?Drar
(Solid)
\
V
/ \
\
>1G Vol.
(Liquid)
S
^^
^
\
\
\
\
Analysis Roouestod - General Comments
(aoorox. concentrations-possible interferences
etc.) (Indicate specific analysis on backside)
/')? /-} '
• I
; v
•
/ ,
. /
, t
, (
• • • •
/ ' \
/ \
SAMPLING
(if applicable)
REQUEST
pv
-•DATE ANALYSIS REQUESTED
-------
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Trace Elements
ppm - for solid samples
Mark-(x) for specific analysis requested
jig/ml - for iiq'uid samples
'cent. N3. i
i
He 1 c^
t
Cd
J U J
! LJ LJ p
JJ~P~L-!
J P f^
_T_ T
J P-
p p~
i p p
! • P P
1T~
J
U
h1
r1
! P P P
! P P
Analysis i.
cthci: ;_!.:
H
Clhcr Analysis -Use Tab'.-. Distil
; ^ . „
/7.^/E
i/wy-1
&&f
^.fe
I
-
A:
J
P
P
V
J
J
_]_
f.'.n
_J
I
-J
J
Mi
J
J
J
p u J p
J
. J
J
J
n—p-
j
i
LJ
i
J
c. — ^^
analysis
J
j
J
J
J
P.-J
j U
J
i : j , .'
_1
_J
P
J
J
J
Sb
_)
Cr
J
-J M
J
J •
J
J
J
_1
J
P P
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Zn
J
_J
J
Cu
J
J
J
P J
( •
J
J
-j
_!
J
u. p.
J
J
-J
J
-OES, 4-* A, 5-ASV,' 6-XttF,
rcq-jostcd (nbovo e;'ch column)
_ _r
u •
Iz/^/y^P/y.&j^, ^
b'/v"/0
. J /f. -}r. ^
f-
J
|^/5/y4-'-2/9 'Jl, P
L?7;/V~i
ty'lf-F
\lr:cf/=
J lcoo_^f
-J Se
J J .
U' p.- .
ir-p :
J ;_i
j p-^;
5 -1 t
3 J .
j j .
•H r
-J J \
B •! F LI
J 1 J p
A£
_i
J H -LJ M
j J • U
"J 7_T~tj~1
"JZET 51
J ^J j£j
j j pi
T- 3 p -
J J LJ
— — ' |— * i— J
j _, |j
_j
j
__j
_J
J
Mnr:< (X) in clock to left of Toer;t. l;O. vrtsn
rsnup;Stina all -•;;•• -ilvsi.s on t\>^.^- \:r.?
Sn
J
J
_
r-1
_!
D~
U
_J
J U
LJ
J
rmd 1- other
-J
J J
J
J . •
J
J
J
J
- P
P
U
u
'
=r" P .
J
-1
-J
J
J
_J
J
_J .
J
J .
J
J
J
:
'
J
-1
-77T* ] to K IT, r> a,-
! ! . l . : . 1
i ;
5r~
cTI
r-f
Lj,
J
J
J.
_..) •
J
•J~ 'L
J u |_i U M
J p U p J
_T^P LI P LI J
J LJ iJ U LJ i.J
hUt
_i
J LJ LJ [.J LJ
.1 p U- p p
- H'T1" P F1"
n? ! Aly^?!i5
-J !
-J i
J-l '*
. — i
•j-
_ t
~J""i~ ' '
i""1 i i.! r • •
rj
cL-i
•J J U U ,J
J J P P _J
fork (x) for spec
J
J
J
J
!
j • i j
J ' P
J p
' p • p
J •
J
J
_l
J . p
u 1
P
!ica«!ysisr£;-.-3s'.e
J
• -1
P
LJ
i
__]
J . • j J
j j p
_j _j
-1 pJ J '
J
_i ••• p
-1
U
-1
-------
Sampling DateTFT
•irM /? I'7
(Must b<2 filled out
(A4^
HoTp
ay
i- irst loent.
No. Used
:LZ
.bfisi; icient
No. Used
?(2. C7-- ^c-
INDUSTRY
IAMPLING
1ETHOD
No.
P.ECD.
- • UNIT PROCESS/OPERATION
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
FUEL USED
'INLET Q
COI'JES TO
r. o.
TTvD.
ETD (METER- VOL. ' IN FT )
F!L!-:i5
ide^t. Mo.
s ft O f /" '
' ' *"7 c ~? /* / — "
-^ ^l-'f-j^
Description of
Sample or. Ss-mole .
•Fraction .
. •
" ") ^/ f" / /"" ' * * *
•^ ^ 5/^/c 1
t
.
}
;
Sr.ir.T:
(Solid)
r^rr
1S Vol.
(Liquid)
ml -
i
t
\
Analysis Roaxje'r-tcd - General Comments
(aonrox. concentroticns-porssible interferences
etc.) (Indicate specific' analysis on backside)
f.j £>r- • '
••>.""'
. •
. «
* *
c -.-.->,-- -v. : '
,. • • _ '
SAMPLING - ' x^ ^^ y <• REQUaST
" • rr,KTR ftv^TOM • .. . ' ppn.TK^T nPPTrpfj fc-fru ffj>.f,t./:<.s.JcS- w^/TT-x^-n RV
(if .applicable) f -
• -DATE ANALYSIS REQUESTED
-------
Sampling Bate Yr.
f-io.juay
RiZVHKT MMPOr
filled /->"+• ^rtv
7^'CJ" ^<
INDUSTRY
ADDR.ESS
SAMPLING
METHOD
i- irst loent.
NO. used
X
b(-jst. ioent. .
No- Used
Run No-
7 TuIF'Table AT
£. A
_ _
-- UNIT PROCESS/OPERATION
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
FUEL USED
'INLET Q
?P&
RE CD.
nCRD.
CGI'iES TO
. o
OUTLET
'GAS VOLUME SAMPLED-
\-J (METER VOL. IN FT )
Ident. No.
Description of
Samole or. Sainnle .
•Fraction .
wt?amc
(Solid)
-3;?£V/r j ' - - ^K '
i
' .->/ X/ /^ i
"3j/;'/y:r
3y^/'/r- /
•3 "V S/V^
X
X
/
X
i
iTi *.',*/.""•* VTf '^ -
1 "" ' '
/
\
\ ^
>1S Vol.
(Liquid)
/
/
/
V^>w I
.^ >. !
X K
\
" ~ T "xn
!
• Apftilysis Reauested - General Comments
(aonprn:. concentrations-possible interferences
eterC) (Indicate specific analysis on backside)
f>y £>,..' • '
•>,""'
. •
\
!
-
•
,s-^ o__ nm_ ^ ^^^ ^L „
(if applicable)
(X
,DArre AMAT,YSTS
-------
' REPORT OF ANALYSIS - . . ' •
Trace Elements . Mark ^ for Soecjfjc 3na!ysis requested
. ppm -for soiid samples -- • ...arX. (x) in block to lcft of Id_t> Ko> wl
jig/rnl - for liquid samples r*au»stinc nil f.n^vsis or> v-^ -™
!^t.No. i ^ |. Be
LJ ,J
! LJ U
! M i
M
r-L- !i- i
,,2r
J
J
JT~-
Cd As V
J J J
J p U •
J p J
J U Li
Kn
J
J
J
J
J J U p
J J J LJ
LJ U U U J U
1 ! ' l
. r
..
AMiysis !.:«:!.<:
-J
^J
J .
.l-K
_l -J LJ (J
j u-ir-p-
P LJ J LJ
Ni
J
J
J
pJ
_J
J
-J
J
-J
J
Sb
J
J
J
Cr
J
J
J
J • |J
_J
-J
J
J
u
J
J
J
J
i
J
J
Zn
J
J
_J '
Cu
J
J
J
Pb
J"
J
J
_J LJ LJ
J
J
J
-1
J •
J
J
J
J
J.
_l
J
i
j
j
i
j
j
So'
J
J
J
_J
U
J
J
J
J.
B
J
J
^
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
F
_J
J
J
J-
J
J
-J
J
J
Li
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J '
J
J •
Ag
J
J
J
J
•Sn Fc
pJ J
hJ -J
r1 rj
i j
J pJ' J
J
J .
J J
J ' J
J pJ J
J
J
J J
J J
Sr
J
-1
Na 'r
J J
J |_l
_J p LJ
H1 M rJ
J U _J
J
J
-J .
_J
J
J J
J J-
J p
J _J
J J
— i 1
( j Ca
J
P
M
Si ;»'.;
J J
_J LJ
_J J
U LJ pJ
J
J
J 1
J p
J U LJ
U P LJ
_j
J
J p
J J
' ?* 1 ^:
H I •
1 !
U
rJ
P
U .
U
P
J
J
•-.-•, ?-5;L".:3, 3-OKS, 4-.rA, 5-ASV, 6-XUF, nnd 7- other - ' Cornm.-'ntP .:
Cihcr Ar.jlys s - U: •.
tot. ;:o. >,
If -
T:b!e L' to !il! analysis requested (nbovi? (?nch column)
a^.
.
i ' •*
Ji-Se///~'.
j/yx/'/r'-J //,. ^
?^/>=>-J *#
9
J
-J
J
J
J
J
J LJ
J
LJ ^ p .
u
j !
M •
H
J
J
LJ
J
!
.J
J
J
J
J
J
-J
J
J
-1
J
_l ' pJ • -.
J • . .
J
J
J
_J U
J
J
J
IT
-J
J .
Ll
J • J
J
J
_J
_J
J
J
-i
j
J . :
J
-J
J
J
J
J
J .
i
iVij.v. (x) (of specific 2:-;iysis rs;1:
P . M •
j
j
j
J
p
J
,
-J
_J
r1 H • 'r1
J pJ
J
M
J LJ '
J
J II
J
J
J
J
J
J
! j
_J
-J
. i
_J
J
J
J
P
P
U
J P
1
-------
APPENDIX E
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
Name
Robert Sholtes
John Dollar
Dennis Falgout
John Chadbourne
Tommy Tucker
Ray Black
Robert Durgan
George Allen
A.L. Wilson
Bill Demery
Mike Jackson
Eric Johnson
Larry Wurts
Andy Taylor
Jim Tscherfinger
Robert Maxwell
Tony Arroyo
Jerome Rom
John Reynolds
Roy Neulicht
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
Title
Project Director
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Chemist
Chemist
Computer Analyst
Environmental Protection Agency
EPA
EPA
EPA
------- |