EMISSION TESTING REPORT
ETB TEST NUMBER 71-MM-05
Emissions From
Dry Process Cement Kiln
at
DRAGON CEMENT COMPANY
NORTHAMPTON, PENNSYLVANIA
Project Officer
Clyde E. RHey
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of A1r Programs
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
PREFACE
The work reported herein was conducted by The Roy F. Weston Company,
pursuant to a Task Order Issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
under the terms of EPA Contract No. CPA 70 - 132 Task Order 1. Cttr. Tom
Cadwallader served as the Project Engineer and directed the Weston field
team consisting of: Messrs. Howard Schlff, Brent Cowan, Larry Johnson, and
Charles Mattocks. Mr. Schlff and Mr. Cowan performed the pollutant analyses
at the Weston laboratories. Roy F. Weston submitted to EPA a draft document
from which EPA personnel prepared the final report (Test No. 71-MM-05).
Approved:
Environmental Protection Agency
GenYW. Smith
Chief, Metallurgical & Mechanical Section
March 27, 1972
11
-------
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
II. List of Tables ~7v
III. List of Figures v
IV. Summary v1
V. Introduction 1
VI. Process Description 2
VII. Discussion of Testing and Results 4
VIII. Appendices
Appendix A - Schematics of Test Locations 18
Appendix B - Field Data and Notes 20
Appendix C - Laboratory Procedures 36
Appendix D - Sample Calculations 39
Appendix E - Test Log 41
111
-------
II. LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page
1 Summary of Particulate Data v11
for Kiln Stack
2 Particulate Emissions Data for 5,6
Kiln Stack
3 Summary of Nitrogen Oxides 9
Testing
4 Summary of Sulfur Dioxide Testing 10
5 Nitrogen Oxide Data Comparing the 11,12,13
Phenoldisulfonic Acid Method vs.
the Dynasciences Instrument
6 Sulfur Dioxide Data Comparing the 14,15,16
Modified Shell Method vs. the
Dynasciences Instrument
7 . Hg Emission Data 17
8 Results of Orsat Analysis 17
C - 1 Results of Sample Recovery Procedure 37
C - 2 Results of Emission Spectroscopy 38
Analysis
E - 1 Sampling Log 41
-------
III. LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title Page
A-l Sampling Locations for 19
Kiln Emissions
-------
IV. SUMMARY
The Office of Air Programs of the Environmental Protection Agency con-
tracted with Roy F. Weston, Inc. to conduct an emission testing program on
the No. 1 and No. 2 kilns at the Dragon Cement Company located in Northampton,
Pennsylvania.
The sampling results demonstrated that the outlet particulate concentrations
from the kilns were low. Baghouse dust collectors controlled the emissions from
each kiln. Particulate concentrations ranged from 0.00592 grains per standard
cubic foot (gr/scf) to 0.00954 gr/scf (taking into account only the narticulates
caught in the probe, cyclone, and filter of the sampling train). Particulates
emitted per ton of feed to the kilns ranged from 0.0553 to 0.0942 (probe, cyclone,
and filter). A summary of the particulate data is presented in Table 1.
In addition to the particulate sampling, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide,
gaseous mercury,and CO, COp, and Op sampling were conducted at the same location.
Nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide concentrations ranged from 94 to 419 ppm and
from 295 to 650 ppm, respectively. The concentration of gaseous mercury was of
the order of 10" parts per million by volume. Percent excess air ranged be-
tween 322% and 466%.
vi
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE DATA FOR KILN STACK
Run Number
Date
Percent Excess A1r
Percent Isok1net1c
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM* dry
Stack Flow Rate - ACFM wet
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled - SCF
Feed Rate - tons/hr
Parti culates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
mg
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs/hr
Ibs/ton feed
Total Catch
mg
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs/hr
Ibs/ton feed
% Implnger Catch
1
4-29-71
322
95.3
51,187
69,470
89.75
44.03
55.6
0.00954
0.00702
4.146
0.0942
118.5
0.0203
0.0150
8.907
0.202
53.1
2
4-29-71
322
95.4
50,643
69,169
88.92
45.75
34.2
0.00592
0.00433
2.532
0.0553
106.7
0.0185
0.0135
8.002
0.175
67.9
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
3
4-30-71
466
95.4
50,013
69,269
87.79
42.93
34.6
0.00607
0.00438
2.601
0.0606
100.1
0.0176
0.0127
7.502
0.175
65.4
vl 1
-------
V. INTRODUCTION
Under the clean air act, as amended, the Environmental Protection
Agency 1s charged with the establishment of performance standards for
new Installations or modifications of existing Installations 1n stationary
source categories which may contribute significantly to air pollution.
In the cement Industry eight plants exhibiting well controlled opera-
tion were selected for the emissions testing program. This report presents
the emissions data for the Northampton, Pennsylvania plant of the Dragon
Cement Company.
On April 29-30, 1971, Roy F. Weston, Inc. conducted source sampling
at the duct from the baghouse collector on the No. 1 and No. 2 kilns of the
Northampton plant. The kilns calcine the raw cement materials (a blend of
ground clay and limestone), producing the element hydraulic calcium silicate
known as "clInker".
Three particulate sampling runs were conducted at the connecting duct
between the kiln baghouse collectors and the kiln stack. In addition, nitro-
gen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and gaseous mercury samples were collected and
analyzed by wet chemical techniques. Continuous monitoring of NOX and S02
concentrations was accomplished using electrochemical reaction sensing
analyzers manufactured by Dynasdences Corp.* The kiln gas molecular weight
was determined using the standard Orsat analytical technique.
* Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
1
-------
VI. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Clay and limestone are trucked to the plant from an open pit quarry
adjacent to the plant. The limestone 1s crushed by an 1mpactor-type crusher
at the rate of 600 tons per hour. The crushed limestone and clay are ground
1n a ball mill and conveyed to storage silos where these materials are sub-
sequently blended with shale and pyHte to form the kiln feed.
The blended feed 1s fed Into one of four sloping (3/8 Inch per foot)
kilns. These coal-fired kilns are 323 feet long by 9 feet Inside diameter
with refractory lining encased 1n a steel cylinder. Fuel consumpton Is about
54 pounds of coal per barrel of cement produced. The coal 1s a blend of 70
percent bituminous and 30 percent anthracite. The bltumuous coal contains
3.10 percent sulfur and an ash content of 7.7 percent and has a heating value
of about 13,900 BTU per pound. The anthracite coal contains 0.4 percent sulfur
and an ash content of 16.3 percent and has a heating value of about 12,800 BTU
per pound. The blended coal (containing 2.29 percent sulfur) 1s ground 1n
Raymond mills to a fineness of about 85 percent through 200 mesh. The dried
and powdered coal 1s swept through and out -a4 the grinding mills by a heated
air stream and blown directly Into the kilns. During passage through the kiln,
the raw materials are heated to a temperature of about 2800°F to produce the
element hydraulic calcium silicate known 1n the trade as "clInker". This mar-
ble-sized clinker Is then discharged from the lower end of the kiln at tempera-
tures exceeding 2000°F and fed Immediately Into air-quenching cooler units
which reduce the temperature of the material to about 150°F. From these coolers,
the newly-formed clInker material is conveyed to a storage silo.
-------
A small amount of gypsum (4.45% by weight) 1s added to the clinker
material and this mixture 1s fed Into the finish grinding mill. The mix-
ture leaving the grinding mill 1s fed to an air-separator or classifier
where the coarse material 1s returned to the mill and the finished cement
(90 percent through 325 mesh) 1s pneumatically pumped to storage silos.
Present plant production 1s approximately 2,250,000 barrels of cement per
year.
The control equipment of Interest 1n this report consist of two Dracco
baghouse collectors on the No. 1 and No. 2 kilns. The gases from each kiln
(1,100°F and 2-4 volume percent moisture) first pass through an Insulated duct
and multlclone, then through an Induced fan, and are then combined Into a sin-
gle duct (at the bottom and between) the two baghouse collectors. Ambient air
1s added to the kiln gases 1n the ducts to lower the gas temperature to about
600°F before entering the baghouses.
The basic unit of the baghouse collector 1s a compartment which contains
56 fiberglass bags (11.5 Inches 1n diameter x 25 feet long) or a total of
2
4,210 ft of filtering area. There are seven (7) compartments 1n each baghouse
and these compartments are about 6 feet wide, 24 feet long, and 30 feet tall
with a single 60° hopper at the bottom. The bags are cleaned by reverse air
flow and sonic horns and each compartment 1s cleaned sequentially. The parti-
culate matter 1s collected on the Inside of the glass-fiber filter bags and
falls to the hopper below where the material 1s removed by a screw conveyor.
Each Dracco baghouse collector 1s designed to handle an air volume of
55,000 ACFM at 600°F for a performance of 99.5 percent efficiency. The effec-
2
tlve collecting surface area of each baghouse 1s 29,500 ft which gives an air
-------
2
to-cloth-rat1o of 1.87 CFM/Ft . The pressure drop across one compartment 1s
about three Inches of water. The expected life of the bags 1s two (2) years
and each bag costs $12.00. The annual operating cost of the four (4) baghouses
1n 1970 was about $20,700.00, of which $12,400 was for labor and maintenance
and $8,300.00 was for new fiber-glass bags. The baghouses were Installed 1n
1958 and the cost of Installation was not available.
VII. DISCUSSION OF TESTING AND RESULTS
Source sampling data was collected at one point 1n the Dragon Cement
Company Plant, Northampton, Pennsylvania. The point was located approximately
60 feet above ground level on the horizontal duct which collects gases from
the two baghouses and Immediately precedes the stack. Four sampling ports, as
shown 1n Figure 1 of Appendix A, were used for collecting partlculate samples
and 2 ports for gaseous sampling (1 port by the Roy F. Weston team and 1 port by
an OAP team). .Detailed dimensions of the partlculate and gaseous sampling
areas may be found In AppendixB .
A detailed description of the partlculate sampling procedures and equip-
ment may be found 1n the Federal Register "Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources", Vol. 36, No. 247 (23 December, 1971). A summary of the
data collected and calculated for these runs 1s presented 1n Table 2. Field
data for each run may be found 1n Appendix B. A sample calculation 1s pre-
sented 1n Appendix D, utilizing the data from Run No. 1.
Sixty equal areas 1n the duct were sampled for two minutes at each area
for a total run time of 120 minutes. Three partlculate runs were conducted.
-------
TABLE 2
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS'.DATA FOR KILN STACK
Run No.
Test Date
Dn
il
Tt
Pm
III
Vm
Tm
Vm
mstd
Vw
If
Vw
wgas
X M
Md
x co2
xo2
X CO
X N2
X EA
MWd
u
MW
,
Cn
p
APS
Ts
NP
Pst
PS
vs
s
QS
3
Qa
Q
X I
* 70°F, 29.
,
Sampling nozzle diameter, in.
Net time of test, m1n. ••
Barometric pressure, in.
Hg absolute
Average Orifice pressure
drop, 1n. HJ3
Volume of dry gas sampled,
ft at meter conditions
Average gas meter temperature, °F
Volume of dry gas sampled at
standard conditions*, SCF
Total H20 collected in impingers
and silica gel , ml
Volume of water vapor collected
at standard conditions*, SCF
X Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Mole fraction of dry gas
Excess Air Percent
Molecular weight of stack gas,
dry basis
Molecular weight of stack gas,
wet basis
P1tot tube coefficient
Average velocity head of stack gas.
Average stack temperature, °F
Net sampling points*
Static pressure of stack gas in. Hg
Stack gas pressure 1n. Hg absolute
Stack gas velocity at stack conditions fpm
2
Stack area, in.
Dry stack gas volumetric flow rate at
standard conditions*, SCFM
Stack gas volumetric flow rate at stack
conditions, ACFM
Percent isokinetic
92 1n. Hg 5
1
4-29-71
0.375
120
29.50
2.54
92.06
79
89.75
39.2
1.86
2.03
0.980
7.5
15,5
<1
77.0
322
29.82
29.58
0.85
0.127
236
60
0.04
29,54
1385
7224
51,187
69,470
95.3
2
4-29*71
0.375
120
29.50
2.40
91.24
79
88.92
42.0
1.99
2.19
0.978
7.5,
15V5;
<1
77.0
322
29.82
29.56
0.85
0.124
239
60
0.04
29.54
1373
7224
50,643
69,169
95.4
3
4-30-71
0.375
120
29.64
2.43
89.99
81
87.79
47.0
2.23
2.47
0.975
5,7
16,8
<1
77.5
466
29.58
29.29
0.85
0.123
250
60
0.04
29.68
1381
7224
50,013
69,269
95.4
-------
TABLE 2 (Concluded)
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS DATA FOR KILN STACK
Run No.
c
•f
"t
'c
C,n
C.o
C.u
C.«
Cax
Ptf
P"
Unit Feed Rate-
Tons/hr
Partlculate
and filter,
Partlculate
- probe
mg
- total
% 1mp1nger catch
Partlculate - probe
and filter, gr/SCF*
Partlculate
Partlculate
and filter.
conditions
Partlculate
stack condl
Partlculate
and filter,
Partlculate
Partlculate
and filter.
Partlculate
, cyclone
, mg
, cyclone.
- total , gr/SCF*
- probe, cyclone,
gr/cf at stack
- total
tions
- probe
Ib/hr.
- total
- probe
Ib/ton
- total
, qr/cf at
, cyclone,
, Ib/hr.
, cyclone,
feed
, Ib/ton feed
44
55
118
53
0
0.
0.
0.
4.
8.
0.
0.
1
.03
.6
.5
.1
.00954
0203
00702
0150
146
907
0942
202
45.
34.
106.
67.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
8.
0.
0.
2
75
2
7
9
00592
0185
00433
0135
532
002
0553
175
3
42.
34.
100.
65.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
7.
0.
0.
93
6
1
4
00607
0176
00438
0127
601
502
0606
175
*70°F, 29.92 1n. Hg, dry basis
-------
At the completion of Run 1, several large (approximately 1/16" to
1/4" diameter) particles were found 1n the probe, cyclone and front half
of the filter acetone wash. Closer Inspection of the duct revealed that
the zero velocity recorded at point D-l (the farthest point from the bottom
port) was the result of a large buildup of encrusted solids 1n this area,
some of which were picked up by the probe. For this reason, the weight of
material (98.1 mg) found 1n this wash has been discounted. In Us place,
the value (17.0 mg) obtained by averaging those found 1n this wash from
Runs 2 (15.9 mg) and 3 (18.0 mg) has been used.
In addition to the build up of encrusted solids at point D-l, 1t was
found that solids were also deposited to a uniform depth of 10 Inches along
the bottom of the duct. It was not possible to clean these solids from the
sampling area. To account for this 'dead1 area, the area of the stack was
calculated to be 7,224 square Inches, rather than 8,016 square Inches which
1s based on the actual duct dimensions.
During the evaporation of the 1mp1nger waters, approximately 300 m11H11ters
of 1mp1nger water from Run 3 was mistakenly poured Into the evaporation beaker
for Run 2. This resulted 1n 1mp1nger water residues weighing 82.0 mg and 22.4
mg for Runs 2 and 3, respectively. This mistake was accounted for by reporting
the average value (52.2 mg) of the weights found for both Runs 2 and 3. As can
be seen 1n the raw data sheets, this value compares favorably with that found
(50.5 mg) for the Implnger wash residue 1n Run 1.
Twelve nitrogen oxide samples were collected during the participate testing.
The first set of samples was collected during a preliminary partlculate run.
-------
The second and third sets of samples were collected during participate runs
1 and 2. The sampling procedure for nitrogen oxides 1s described 1n the
Federal Register (December 23, 1971), Method 7. A summary of the nitrogen
oxide results 1s shown 1n Table 3.
Three sulfur dioxide samples were collected and analyzed according to
Method 6 of the Federal Register(December 23, 1971). The results are pre-
sented 1n Table 4.
Continuous monitoring of oxides of nitrogen and sulfur dioxide was con-
ducted at the baghouse Inlet and outlet utilizing electrochemical reaction
sensing analyzers. The readings, which were taken every 2- 5 minutes, are
presented 1n Tables 5 and 6.
Three gaseous mercury samples were collected using a m1n1«1mp1nger train
by bubbling the baghouse effluent through an acidic solution of Iodine monochlo-
rlde, collecting mercury and mercury containing compounds, nameless atomic
absorption spectrophotometry was used for analysis of the resultant solutions.
The mercury data 1s presented 1n Table 7.
Results of the Orsat analysis are presented 1n Table 8.
8
-------
Table 3
Summary of Nitrogen Oxide Testing
Sampling Sampling Time NO, Milligrams Sample Volume, Concentration,
Date
28 April 1971 1425 0.665 1.9143 182
28 " " 1430 0.340 1.9099 93
28 " " 1435 0.570 1.9815 153
28 ii " 1440 0.650 2.0647 159
Dragon Cement Co.
Sampl ing
Sampl ing Time
1425
1430
1435
1440
1108
1112
1115
1118
1603
1607
1610
1612
29.92 in. Hg.
>y volume calculated
5.25 x 102 (mg N02)
- Northampton, Pennsylvania
i.ocation - Kiln
NO, Mill i grams
0.665
0.340
0.570
0.650
0.690
1.480
0.835
1.070
0.430
0.493
0.570
0.648
by the equation
Duct
Sample Volume,
1 itersCL
1.9143
1.9099
1.9815
2.0647
1.8890
1.8497
1.7677
1.7958
1.7955
1.8827
1.8940
1.9185
29 " " 1108 0.690 1.8890 192
29 " " 1112 1.480 1.8497 420
29 " " 1115 0.835 1.7677 248
29 " " 1118 1.070 1.7958 313
29 " " 1603 0.430 1.7955 126
29 " " 1607 0.493 1.8827 138
29 " " 1610 0.570 1.8940 158
29 " " 1612 0.648 1.9185 177
ppmv NO, -
(Sample Volumer*
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF SULFUR DIOXIDE TESTING
Dragon Cement Co. - Northampton, Pennsylvania
Sample Location - K1ln Duct
Sampling Date Sampling Time mg SCL SO
24-hour clock ppmv
29 April, 1971 935-1100 115.7 296
29 April, 1971 1435-1542 131.1 396
30 April, 1971 955-1130 89.4 196
%. Calculated to 70°F, 29.92 1n. Hg by the following formula:
0.752 x mg S0? x (T + 460)
ppmv S02 - p-—-n
£ pb x vm
where:
mg S02 e weight of S02 collected
Tffl = Average gas meter temperature, °F
PJJ = Barometric pressure, 1n. Hg Absolute
V 3 Volume of dry gas sampled at meter conditions,ft
10
-------
TABLE'.?
Nitrogen Oxide data comparing the PDS
Me
Date
4-28-71
4-28-71
4-28-71
4-28-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
Time
14:25
14:30
14:35
14:40
11:08
11:12
11:15
11:18
14:35
14:40
14:45
14:50
14:55
15:00
15:05
15:10
15:15
zero un
15:30
15:35
15:40
15:45
15:50
lod vs the Dyr
metnod
182
94
153
159
191
419
247
312
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
t
—
—
—
—
—
11
ipscience Instrument
Dynasdence
170
170
160
170
170
180
180
160
180
160
160
160
160
160
Comments
All values are 1n ppm
NOX dry basis
Sampling point located
after baghouse
PDS: Phenol di sol fonlc
Add
-------
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Date
4-29-71
4-29-71
4 on 71
— C3— / 1
4-29-71
A. 9Q-71
H— c,y 1 \
4-29-71
4-PQ-71
*T C~J 1 \
4-29-71
4*29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
Time
15:55
16:00
16:05
16:10
lfi'1?
1 U • 1 £.
16:15
16:20
16:25
I§r3°un1t
16:35
16:45
17:00
09:35
09:40
09:45
09:50
09:55
09:58
10:00
10:05
10:10
10:15
zero unit
10:35
10:40
metnod
—
—
158
177
i / /
-__
12
Dynasc1ence£
170
170
160
170
165
165
175
170
175
180
200
200
200
220
230
230
220
230
230
230
230
150
150
Comments
Sampling point "located after
baghouse
All values are In ppm
NOX dry basis'
-------
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Wet
Date
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-39*71
4-30-71
4-30-71
Time
10:45
10:50
zero unit
11:00
11:05
11:10
11:15
11:20
11:25
11:30
11:35
13:07
13:10
13:15
Method
—
"*•""
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
...
13
Dynasdences Comment
150
150
160
170
170
170
170
170
180
170
320
340
335
'
Sampling point
located after
baghouse.
All values are 1n ppm
NO dry basis
Sampling point located
before baghouse. Note
decrease 1n NO upon
passage of gases through
baghouse.
-------
TABLE 6
SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA COMPARING THE MODIFIED
Date
4-29-71
*t™*,«7 / 1
4.29-71
•T~fc5 I \
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
SHELL METHOD
Time
09*35
\jy •
-------
Date
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-29-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
Time
16:25
16:30
16:35
zeroed
unit
16:45
17:00
09:35
09:40
09:45
09:50
09:55
09:58
10:00
10:05
10:10
10:15
zeroed
unit
10:35
10:40
10:45
10:50
zeroed
unit
11:00
11:05
11:10
11:15
11:20
11:25
11:30
11:35
TABLE 6 (Continued)
Readings
480
510
390
380
260
350
350
350
390
380
510
420
420
330
400
240
420
420
400
420
340
500
260
250
240
230
Wet Method
Sampling
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
Comments
Sampling port
located after
baghouse.
All values
are 1n ppm
S02 dry
basis
Sampling port
located after
baghouse.
15
-------
TABLE 6 (Continued)
Modified Shell Method Sampling Time and Dates
Date Time Run
4-29-71 0935-1100 1
4-29-71
4-30-71
0935-1100
1435-1542
0955-1100
2
3
Sulfur Oxide data recorded from the
Dynasdences Instrument
Date
4-30-71
4-30-71
4-30-71
Time
13:07
13:10
13:15
Dynasdences
1350
1800
1200
Comments
All values are 1n
ppm SO, dry basis.
Sample port located
before baghouse.
Note the decrease
1n S02 concentration
upon passage of the
gas through the bag-
house
.16
-------
TABLE 7
Hg EMISSION DATA
Run No.
Date
mg Hg
Tm - Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
m
Pb - Barometric Pressure, "Hg abs.
V - Volume of dry gas sampled
1
4-30-71
0.000393
92
29.64
2.365
2
4-30-71
0.000179
105
29.64
2.375
3
4-30-71
0.000161
104
29.64
2.035
3
meter conditions, ft.
ppm Hg dry basis*
0.00074
0.00034
0.00036
Calculated by using the formula
ppm Hg « 0.2399 x^Hp x (T, * 460?
m
Note: Values are within limits of detectab111ty of the analysis method (2 x 10~5
ppm).
Carbon Dioxide - C02
Oxygen - 02
Carbon Monoxide - CO
Nitrogen3 - N2
Molecular Weight
TABLE 8
RESULTS OF QRSAT ANALYSIS
Percent by Volume
29 April
7.5
15.5
77.0
29.82
- Dry Basis
30 April
5.7
16.8
77.5
29.58
Determined by subtraction from 100 percent.
17
-------
VIII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
SCHEMATICS OF TEST LOCATIONS
18
-------
DRAGON CEMENT COMPANY
NORTHAMPTON, PENNSYLVANIA
SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR KILN EMISSIONS
PARTICULATE SAMPLING
PORTS
o
BAG HOUSE
47'
—f-
NOTE: NOTE. DRAWN TO SCALE
DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE
GAS
FLO*
S
T
A
C
K
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA AND NOTES
20
-------
PRtSURVFY - PROCESS INDUSTRY
AM;-: OF COMPANY,^^ a~m*j DATE. O
ADDRESS CITY //krz^^tW^U^ STATE
NAME OF CONTACT %\ >4*vA. y£W^*n TITLE^t/ ffig-y. PHONED? -
PROVIDE FLOW DIAGRAM OF EACH PROCESS TO BE SAMPLED, INCLUDING FEED COMPOSITIONS AND
RATES, OPERATING TEHPSMATURES AKD PRESSURES, PfcOOUCT RATES, AND PP.OPOSLD SAMPLING SITES:
Mhi.//&-<*.
COIii-'.EHTr,:
.
. &ruzf- dJivzL - je. 2- {,3
-------
PROVIDE DIAGRAM OF tACM SAMPLING SITE. INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
DIMENSIONS TO NEAREST OBSTRUCTION IN ALL DIRECTIONS FROM SAMPLING
PORT.
COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF ALL PORTS INCLUDING ALL DIMENSIONS. DESCRIPTION
OF ANY UNUSUAL FEATURES ABOUT ENVIRONMENT; HEIGHT, ODORS, TOXIC CONDITIONS,
TEMPERATURE, DUST, ETC.
>v
81
47'
D
3
F
3
22
-------
OPERATING HOURS OF PLANT PERSONNEL
OPERATING SCHEDULE FOR EACH PROCESS TO BE SAMPLED
ARE PROCESSES BATCH OR CONTINUOUS?
LIST FEED RATES AND COMPOSITION FOR EACH PROCESS
LIST ANY CONTROL EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING SIZE
&r£j&> , WIDTH
INSULATION
DIAMETER $
WALL THICKNESS C
A l-Q- />5"
-^ ->-*
<2 -^
DISTANCE TO NEAREST UPSTREAM RESTRICTIO
TYPE OF RESTRICTION
DISTANCE TO NEAREST DOWNSTREAM RESTRICTION / 3 ' TYPE OF RESTRICTION
ARE PORTS EXISTING? fj YES, SIZE
NO, WHO WILL PROVIDE THEM?_
23
-------
SCAF'OLDJNG OR OTHER MEANS OF SUPPORT .PRESENT?
YES
NO, WHO WILL PROVIDE IT?
/ft/C
SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY AVAILABLE? £J YES, MAXIMUM AMPERAGE PER CIRCUIT
DISTANCE
WHO WILL. PROVIDE EXTENSION CORDS?
LOCATION OF FUSE BOX
•pAwm • FACILITIES AVAILABLE FOR TRAILER OR VAN?
SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON PASSES?_
NEARBY RESTAURANTS AND MOTELS
j._^k*>a
LIST AW SPECIAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT OR RULES
COJ-iiMF.iJTS:
scr\-
Jj
SURVEY BY
24
-------
ROY F. WES1ON
I n. 2-
95? iajf
lOlf freqt
It. Jo
. rf.
(I if nr
Jo jy.
^ «g»t«)«-V^TIO\ ^7/» ^
to
" a
„ '57.6i
B:Jo =^^i.3o
yf.90
ffl^.04
a6me. 4,<^m4.
10 >
66.
31,00
25
-------
,. VELOCITV TWIVCRSE FIELD DATA
I/- if-?/
St-"llnn H.lt»
Garteitt
Plant _ _
Test V^*-"^-C^x***.
/ .3 AS •
-3 i. 3 A*
. 7
7t. 7
3/.B
S.fb
3.03
It, 113
Location jK/n vftfccjfr -6affa»si/ "/-
17.7*3
Operator j£^g>
9
Meter
/•». .
f ,-•„,,
1 i>i;
,
z
3
/
i
JJ
i
V
313.
•VX.
47.1
.1,;V
' , .
: >^7^/v
]7J>ZV
Vrf
l.Xt
1 PT
.?. 23
.I.."..' '.'i
"di
-?£_5-v
7y,j<-
7?.^
! * y, ! .
S.Vf | .
I
; i
V ••.!.
x" 1 L 9.31
m ?.3i
*.r& 7.3V
'Vh
?x
<>r
%,
i^a
;3?a
/31I
'in
Jf.fl
J9.il
V,
5^««
L5TflV/jr
W9O*
29.JT9
21~F#
!,
'r»n-:-
M4»*-f
I<#^r3
Clod:
Tin:
.
Point
/
1
3
V
5"
^
7
fr"
7
/o
//
/x
'-•*
4rr
o
o
.01
.01
.01,"
.n
• 10
•n>
.it.
.22-
,2i"
_.Jfl.
./7?
^
•or
•«
• «3
.03
•o»
,oy
•oy
.16
.is-
•23
,22
• 13
~ *f
|:i? -
, <1'.
.
tr^ni
./i- •
.13
./•>-
• 17
. .is-
.'f
,2*
•;r
• 2-b
.u
.n
•ig.. ,
J.th
?i o
0
o
.01-
.M
./J
;/;
,i6
,/*
,11-
.13
- ' * I
- -j,^
I? I
StftCl: T
~ { ? >"
L-..:,it.*r
• W
• -v- -
-
(?) »P, In. II20 Avarscv
-t
•ffij,
0£JUt+< 0*»+>w™
e 3r *
»
1
t
V i
a."
\
9
PP.ILIM1HABY FIELD DATA tihljl
_ Stack Geoaetnr Operator ^-£4/1* / cJ^f.
Test Ito.^/t^a* 6>s»*^f
ly Absorption:
twatlfln 7?-/
A. Dlst. from Inside of far vail to outstde of
nttr vail. In.. - $ W
t. Mil Ullcknesi. In., • f "
Inside 4i4i^ka« of stack • A-e 3.3 Z
Stack Area • 90/a^ tf^TArwH Ar*
' (atmto-. l^Jk tetter* v**ce***J *»J4
Clock
Time
3 :/tf
y./7
Heter
(Ft3)
tgs:*-1*"
Sr-t . 1~, for
jtaisjlv stack
, jf .« -t-f-
*~i&
14 X
35- ?
^*j j
JJIf! :
•S>/ ;
^3*
o^ •*
"7il Z «
?f ?. =.
Ollt. fnai outside
of samle port, In.
: 7.il
[ 11$,
L 1 C B
r 3^
— J^Li
5" 'if
4^1
i^*
^3|
??^
;VA
Tub* Ho
U>tti^
Height, grans
Final
20S
2.01
Initial
y<* :».<
iar>
Difference
• 5-..*
1
(H) • weight of moisture collected • ^
I Itolsture by Vo
I Moisture by Vo
By Uet and Dry B
Ket Bulb Te
Dry Bulb Te
:0 (12/OT)
ume • '°°'H
Zns, 0 «**•€. ••" *^*-M
\^m * / 50j.
lume • -- 2.O
ulb Temperatures
mp. •
t Moisture From Psychometric Chart
26
-------
Pl.nt
Date
Swpllng location Kit >1
STACK DATA FOR NOJWRAPH:
I. H»tcr tH /. @ 7
2. Avg. «ter tempt (ambient t 20* 70 *F
3. Moisture (volume) 2- t
4. Avg. static press, iff O.lf In. K2»X.D73 -O -0 7 In. Hg.
5. Bar. press sanpllng point 30.':3 1n.Ha_p ,.it/ " (static press In.Hq)
3O.73 In. Hg.
6. Bar press of meter 30.Cy In. Hg.
8. Avg. stack temperature
«
-
ltnt Dragon
I.o:at1on
Ddte
Operator
9. Avg. stack velocity (aP)_
C factor (1) '•
CO, -75"
X ->s.f
CO - .3"
^ibleiu Tcsip T
St-plc Sox Jlo.
"tlstcr Sox Ho.
deter .\ H
C factor /. /fQ
Re;d ^r,(J record «•. the s*art of
each tfist point.
PATHOLOGICAL i:JCU.£aATOaS-
read and record every 5 oinotes.
Bar. Prc^s. 'H9 Jig. 6*1 -
AsotJi.'3d lioisturc fJ ^
Hc-;er 3cx Scttlr.^. •."
?robc Tip 015.. in. O. I
Probi L.-.-.s'ch __ / J '
Prabo llrilcr Sc-'Ctiritj '
,, ,1 "
27
-------
Run r.iciber: .l ^em*>i7
^ Location of se^lc port:
^ Barometric prcssurt:_
t twiperaturt: jy"
Volui'S after sar.plir.g llCTil Container .'!o.>9r finer-chloroform extraction ;
ffa . of InipJnfjCr nat:r *f?L PS
lnpll.ojr prcfilled i:ithZ.»?.ml -Cufn llo. v' —
VoltM collected "Xo. al fS*^ .til luplngcr water residue S o*f. mp
Imjiliscrs and bad: naif of Container :io. I^O
filter, acetone )ii!'): Eiftra llo. lrf>^ Weight r.:su1ts_
Dry probe and cyclone catch: Container ::o.
Eyf&J.'o. Weight r;sjl'.s__ m)
-—j^-jj---——:—
•obj, cyclo-'c, fla^1:, ?nd Container :.'o. ' ^" ff/4r*tij>&. r*V"Jp^
front half of filter. j^' tio _i£6V Hclsht'rcsulr/_ it/_K3
Frol
fi
ac.:toro
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particubte
Filter nunber Container ro. Filter nunbcr Container nc.
ft t
Filter partlculite
, Hei9ht_31t4_
al^partionlate v.^jojit /9f- i "
Sil-ca Gel
Ki'lghl after test:
Wnlght before test: ll'^T -
Hiisture ucigiit collected: _/_i.~
Container mB'ber: 1. 2. 3. «._
Moisture total 3?. 2. _ga
Sanslc r.unbcr:
Hetiod dcternir,ation:_
Cop.xnts:
Analyze for:
_^1^2s£,
28
-------
Hun l.'o. .
Location
- Date
Operator _J
'"SP9l« Box Do.! g
'tistor Box No. ISPS"
Meter .» H (j.
C Factor
; PARTICULAW FIELD DATA '
.year IMPCPTAKT - FILL in ALL BLAXKS
I Read end record at the start of
•each test point.
PATHOLOGIC/!!. INC
:road and record every S ntnutoi.
tabient Tcpp "F iau
Bar. Press. "Hg ,^?.3
Assuasd Moisture X ^
Hester Sox Settle;, '"_
; Probe Tia D1a.. In. O^lS
\ 't.-iSr Probe L;r.cth /g'
29
-------
Date:
PAF.TICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
.Run number:
Open tor:
box nuin
M
Location of sample-port: A". .',. :. •',, ^ ,/•
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature: ^ ^
fcnpinger H
Volune after sampling 2?D ml Container No.._
Ircpinger prefilled with/"> ml .Exfefjr No.
Volu.v.e collected JQ ml
Ettier-ch'oroform extraction
• of imp-'nger water
.^ Iropingc-r water residue .^
Impingers and bade half of
filter, acetone v;as'i:
Container fio. / "
cxwa No. f
Weight results _________ / j J _ mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch: Container No.
Extra No. Weight results
_J"9
Prob.^, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
/ '/^
Container N'o. H
a No.
'/j^
iciht results
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container nc.
Vi/S 6 tizj
Filter particulr.te
Total particulate weight
SiVca Gel
Weight after test: -^
Winght before test: 3.
Mriisture weight collected: _^^
Container number: 1. 2.
Moisture total
3.
4.
Samilc number:
Analyze for:
Method determination:
I -
Co;n.Ti(Lnts:
••t>T'."T'^"> ___l_ ~r~~f~'~*~~'7.-
30
-------
Operator
ScRple Box no.!
"lJ3t".r Doi No.
Heter A H /,
PASTICUIATE' PIELO DATA
VEIlf IH?CPT«iT - FILL IN ALL BLAKKS
Read and record at the start of '
each test point.
PATHOLOGICAL INCICCMTOIIS- '.
read and record (very 5 plmjtci.
Ambient Temp •r__JTt
Bar. Press. "Hg %^<
Assura:d Moisture I
Hester Sox Settlr.j. *F_
Probe Tip Die.. In. c7:375~
Probe Lir.<;ih fO
31
-------
Date:
PAf.TICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
plant:
Run number: _jj>
Open tor:
Sample box number:
Location of samplrport: A"'
Barometric pressure: 2' f , C' '-/'
- ^,
Ambient temperature: ____ ^~\
Impinger
Volune after sampling ^Om\ Container No. Ether-ch*oi*oform extraction
Impinger prefilled with^Oml fiirtra No. >«|/ ' of ^p-'nger water _J
——— \) ' ~ *^ "~ .
Volur.ie collected AO ml /^ Impinger v/ater residuejr
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone v/asir.
Container f!o._
No. /.5'7-S Weight rosults_
•Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container f.o.
Extra No.
Height results
nig
Probs, cyclone, flask, and
Container No.
ts
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulatfe
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container nc
V/S
I
Total particulate v/eight
Filter particulr.te
weight _______ /£.(> mg
; __: _ / QQ, I nic;
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
13-1
Moisture
2.
3.
4.
Sannlc number:
Method determination:
Com.r£nts:
Analyze for: ___
__ hAtJK 4
"52 "•
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN FIELD OATA
Recarts:
0< IDES OF IIITBOGEH F1ELO DATA
Oate S/Z-r/7/
CO
U> |
Sample Collected By $re+\
Run No. 0n £.
Power Stat Setting \
Field Data
Mock tine
:lask nunter
Foluaa of flask less
correction (IHer)
-tCo
J f~
\0
^
1
>fcf
«x7
^.40
,->/
jo'T0
5-^"
7
?r
/x.;
^.••vr
c
J<"t
Remarks:
OIIDCS OF tllTROCEH FIELD DATA
V- 2-5-7 /
i Collected By . Cb*i+*J
Run no. t*r
Power SUt Setting 70
Field Data
Clock tine
Talk nunter
rolune of flask less
correction (liter)
>re*sure before sampling
In Hg.
'ressure after sampling
In Hg.
Task temperature. *F
&
,2-
^"°
*
y.y
ff
j*rt
X-1
H*-
lit"
z
?sff
l?.o
7^-
•
Re«"*s:
KC»e-33 (12/C7)
:5 (12/07)
(12/67)
-------
Client; ,-f?CO {'M. tft^.'J*^ \ PorsonnH:
Locat ion: AJcPtti /M*< X)fe *** Sanali- Locat i<
U.O. Wo. ^ftO - I F . Dai..-
Pol lutant and Run No
F
Tine S
T
F
Gas Met-, r S
Total ft."
F.
Vacuum S,
In. Hq. Av.
Inlet F.
Te-ip. S.
" F . Av
Outlet F
Teiip. 5^
"V Av.
Inpinger F.
Volumes 5.
F: Iter Paper
Si 1 ica Gel
Thinblc
"^Txl
ir.bo
Q-2S
l:i^
•111-116
M Ifi
fiJf
1 0
O.fT
.If
yi'
v/
»Jl
s6
4o
ft9
4ln
***~
lit!
S* *V^-^*^
J 3S~
*tis. at.
fii.ni
/3)I
.r
,^
<•
£.i(4
•id
^
4?
6°
£1
If
V&
/r^u
W&
^
location: AJon+L t4* **.*{* *• "(** Sample Location: .ZL-J- XJ2+* &f**KL
Pol lutdnt and Run No
F
Tine S
T
F
Gat Heter S
Total ft.''
F.
Vacuum S
In Ha Av
Inlet F
Te-*>. S
"F AV
Outlet F.
Tr-np. S.
"F AV.
Inplnqer F.
Volume* S.
Fi Iter Paper
Si I ica Gel
T-inol-
COt rf£
ij'^fD
q.if
4fl"
yz-'
W
4*
.ff
y,'
Si--?
3S. f
1*
ff(A
-------
OKSAT FIELD DATA
ORSAT FIELD DATA
CO
en
; C
LoMticr..
Dite
Operator
i>w*«— y —
Teit
CL
(C02)
Reidfng 1
r.L
Retdlng 2
(CO)
Reading 3
c
local I en
Tine fs^-fZlV
Operator^
ludlng 1
(udlng 2
(CO)
leading 1
KC4P-31 (12/67)
KCAP-31 (12/07)
-------
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY PROCEDURES
The distribution of participates collected within the sampling train
1s presented 1n Table C-l. An emission spectroscopy analysis was conducted
on the residue samples to determine the concentrations of the elements 1n
Table C-2.
A chemical analysis was performed on the partlculate sample collected
1n the front half of run No. 2 to determine the ammonium and sulfate contents.
The weight percent of each component was found to be (<0.1) and 0.3, respec-
tively.
For a description of analytical procedures used for the analysis of the
S09 and NO samples, please refer to the Federal Register, December 23, 1971
•• n
(Vol. 36, No. 247), Methods 6 and 7.
Sampling and analytical procedures, pertaining to gaseous mercury
sampling maybe found In Method 1, December 7, 1971, Federal Register (Vol. 36,
No. 235).
36
-------
TABLE C - 1
RESULTS OF SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURE
Implnger HJ) + H?0 wash of
Implngers, connectors and
back half of filter holder
Acetone wash of Implngers,
connectors and back half
of filter holder
Probe, connector, front
half of filter holder,
acetone wash
Filter
H20 & wash
Total Participates
rash of
s and
holder
ngers,
half
t>nt
r,
if Implnger
Ion
RFW 1
Beaker #
Net wt., mg
RFW f
Beaker #
Net wt., mg
RFM I
Beake-
Net wt., mg
RFW f
Filter #
Net wt., mg
RFW #
Beaker 1
Net wt.» ng
Run 1
1566
141
50.5
1565
140
7.7
1564
139.
98. lc
1567
W.S. F4
38.6
1566
148
4.7
Run 2
1570
144a
82. Oa
1569
143
15.8
1568
142
15.9
1571
W.S. F5
18.3
1570
149
4.5
Run 3
1574
147.
22.4b
1573
146
9.7
1572
145
18.0
1575
W.S. F8
16.6
1574
150
3.6
199.6
136.5
70.3
Notes:
a,b. Implnger water from Run 3 partially mixed with that of Run 2. Average
value 1s 52.2 mg.
c. Encrusted solids from duct probably Included 1n this value. Use
average of Runs 2 and 3 Instead, 17.0 mg.
d. Actual values; total partlculates as per notes a,b, and c are as
follows: Run 1, 118.5; Run 2, 106.7; Run 3, 100.1.
37
-------
TABLE C- 2
RESULTS OF EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS
Dragon Cement, Northampton,
Analysis of residue samples*
Concentration, mlcrograms per
Element
Sb
As
Be
Cd
Cr
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
HI.
Se
V
Zn
Sample weight, mg.
Volume of gas sampled, scf.
gram (fig/g)
Run No. 1
(Total Catch)
<144
<361
<1
1,500
1,400
900
50,000
800
350
1,300
<361
<7
14,000
199.6
89.79
Pennsylvania
Run No. 2
(Front half only)
.
-
w
-
400
3000
5000
200
100
600
•»
-
•
15.9
88.92
* Analysis conducted by EPA.
38
-------
APPENDIX D
PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
Example: Run no. 1 on K1ln Stack
1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions: 70°F, 29.92 in. Hg, SCF
17'7 x Vm (ph+ P|11 ) 17>/ x 92.06(29.50+ ^J.) -
v , JO! , _,. L* B 89.75 SCF
mstd (Tn + 460) T79+ 460)
2. Volume of water vapor at 70°F and 29.f? in. Hg, SCF
V = 0.0474 x V. = 0.0474 x 39.2- 1.86 SCF
''qas ''
3. Percent moisture in stack qas
100 x V ,
v, n . -JUS.5. = .IDLxJJL6,, 2.03
V 4 V 89.75 + 1.86
mstd wgas
4. Hole fraction of dry gas
'c; ..:.. a 2.03 = 0.98
''
£. AvcrarjQ moleciilar v/eiqht of dry stack gas
/> ^ QO OO
7.5 x TV7T } + {15.5 x 1W J '*' ( 77 x 1W ) = 29.82
6. Molecular v.'oi(]lit of stack tjas
HW - !'".J(| x i;r| •!- 18 (1 - Md) =29.82 xQ.980 + 18 (1 - .980 ) a 29.58
7. Stock rjas1 vulocity at star.!: conditions, fpm
i— "~"i^ • '•
r,3CO x9.4 I ... _1 -1385 fpm
[29.54 A29.58J
39
-------
Stack gar. volumetric flow rate at standard conditions*, SCFii
0.123 x Vc x Ac x M. x P. 0.123 x 1385 ;x 7224 x0.98x29.§4 „ 51,187cf^.
rt — o »> _______ NJ __._** — _ ______________ _ _ ~" o v r ••')
9. Stack qas volumetric flow rate? at stack conditions, ACFM
n ~ •05Cl'15 x Qc * . (Tr + 460) _ .05645 x51 .187 *(236 + 4C-0) _ ,Q A7ft ACFM
qa ^..^ , "29.54X 0.98 ~ " 69>47°
10. Percent isokinet'ic
1,032 x (T. + 460) x V
SI = _____ _ ___ ^tJ s It032_x (236-^ 460.).. x 89. 75 = g5>3%
Vc x Tt x Pc x !!, x (!)n)2 1385 x 120x29. 54x0. 9Bx(0.375TZ
o U o vJ 1 1
11. Particulatc: probe, cyclono and filter., .-gr/SCF* Dry Rasis
m
.
C = O.mW x. -TT^— = 0.0 !•»»• A 55.6 -=0 QOg5/ir/SCF
an v -- u.uusb^
1?. Part-.lcul'Tt.p tnl-.-l . nr/^cr* 'Vv
C = 0.0154 y. rr-^- = 0.0154 x _Ufix5_ =0 0203qr/SCF
'mstf, 89.75
13. Parti culato: pro::r;, cyclone end filt.er, nr/CF at stack conditions
r 17'7 x Cnn x Ps x "d 17'7 X0.00954X 29.54 x.98
c«:t B -- rrp"+-3nnj) -- B -- — (^ » 460) - a °-00702
14. Participate: total, gr/CF at stack conamons
17.7 x C.u) x PS x Md 17.7 x 0.0203x29.54x0.98
Ciiu = (T~"HEOl = P236 + 460) = "°-015 g^/CF
15. Porticulate: probe, cyclone, and filter, Ib/hr
C = 0.00357 x C, x Or = 0.00857 X0.00954X51 ,187 =4.146 lb/hr
?.v.' an T>
16. Pa rt i cul nto : toto 1 , 1 b/ h r
C. - O.OOar.y ;- C. . x 0 •-- O.OOB57 xO.0203 X51.187 ==8.907 i[)/hr
ax i'O s
17. Participator^ pro!.;:, cyclono, a:;;i filter, Ib/ton feed
Ib/ton
i \ii ; icjuiu.; iota/,
" 70°F, 29.92 in. Hn
c 40
-------
APPENDIX E
TEST LOG
Table E - 1 presents the actual time during which the participate testing
was conducted.
Table E - 1
Sampling Log
Run
Date
Sampling Port
j—
B
C
D
10:17
11:03
11:43
Ended
10:47
11:33
12:11
Elapsed
Time (m1n)*
24
30
30
28
4-29-71
D
C
B
A
14:38
15:20
15:55
16:49
15:04
15:50
16:25
17:15
26
30
30
26
4-30-71
A
B
C
D
09:59
10:32
11:15
11:54
10:25
11:02
11:45
12:18
26
30
30
24
Traverse points exhibiting zero or negative flow were not sampled, and the
probe was moved to the next point having a positive velocity head.
41
------- |