EMISSION TESTING REPORT
ETB TEST NUMBER 71-MM-15
Emissions From
Wet Process Cement Kiln
at
OREGON PORTLAND CEMENT
LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON
Project Officer
Clyde E. Rlley
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of A1r Programs
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
PREFACE
The work reported herein was conducted by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Office of Air Programs, Emission Testing Branch (ETB), Metal-
lurgical and Mechanical Section. Mr. Clyde Riley served as the Project
Officer and directed the ETB field team consisting of Mr. Howard Crist
and Mr. Allan Riley. Mr. Philip K. York and Mr. James C. Herlihy served as
Project Engineers. Mr. Howard Crist and Mr. Allan Riley performed the
particulate analyses at the EPA laboratories.
Approved:
Environmental Protection Agency
\JLu (dr.
vicuc n . out i 1.11
Chief, Metallurgical & Mechanical Section
March 29, 1972
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. List of Tables 2
II. Introduction 3
III. Summary of Results 4
IV. Process Description 7
V. Location of Sampling Points 9
VI. Process Operation 9
VII. Sampling And Analytical Procedures 10
APPENDIX A - Particulate Results 10
APPENDIX B - Operation Results 16
APPENDIX C - Field Data 17
APPENDIX D - Standard Sampling Procedures 44
APPENDIX E - Laboratory Report 45
APPENDIX F - Test Log 47
APPENDIX G - Project Participants and Titles 48
-------
• I- LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page
I Summary of Particulate Testing 5
II Summary of Gaseous Testing 6
III SOo Continuous Monitoring Summary Results 6
A-I Particulate and Gaseous Emission Data H
A-II Particulate Calculations 13
A-III SC>2 Continuous Monitoring Results I5
E-I Particulate Mass Determination 46
F-I Sampling Log 47
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Under the Clean A1r Act, as amended, the Environmental Protection
Agency 1s charged with the establishment of performance standards for
new Installations or modifications of existing Installations In stationary
source categories which may contribute significantly to air pollution.
The development of realistic performance standards requires accurate
data on pollutant emissions within the various source categories. In the
cement Industry, the Oregon Portland Cement plant located 1n Lake Oswego, Ore-
gon was designated by EPA as representative of a well controlled operation,
and was thereby selected for emission testing. This report presents the re-
sults of tests conducted at that plant.
The Oregon Portland Cement plant operates at a production rate of
approximately 4000 barrels per day. The plant recently (July, 1967), installed
a 135,000 ACFM baghouse.
The gases from the rotating kiln are directed through the 10 compartment
baghouse prior to emission to the atmosphere.
I
Three partlculate runs were conducted at the baghouse stack. Also two
cumulative gas samples were collected during two of the partlculate runs.
The following sections of this report treat (1) a summary of results,
(2) a description of the process, (3) the location of sampling points, (4)
process operating conditions, and (5) sampling and analytical procedures.
-------
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Tables I and II present a summary of results from the partlculate
and gas emission testing.
The kiln baghouse emissions collected in the front-half catch (probe
and filter) ranged from 0.247 to 0.309 pounds per ton of kiln feed. The
total catch (includes impinger portion) ranged from 0.291 to 0.535 pounds
per ton of kiln feed.
Presented in Table III are S02 summary results recorded during con-
tinuous monitoring of S02 concentrations by an electrochemical S02 sensing
analyzer.
-------
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE TESTING
Run dumber
Date
Percent Excess Air
Percent Isokinct'ic
Stack Flow Rote - SCFM* dry
Stack Flow Rate - ACF!', wot
Volume of Dry Pas Sampled - SCF
Feed Rate - tons/hr
P?rti c^'lates
Probe, Cvclor-o, & Filter Catch
mg
gr/SCF* dry
cr/CF
-------
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF GASEOUS TESTING
Gas Composition (Vol. % Dry)
Run C09 p., CO N0
—c —c — —f,
1 18.6 5.0 <1 76.4
2 17.6 5.2 <1 77.2
-TABLE III
CONTINUOUS MONITORING SUMMARY RESULTS
Date Beqan Ended Elapsed T1me(m1n)_
10-5-71 13:10 13:50 50 52
10-6-71 09:30 11:38 128 " 22
10-7-71 14:35 14:40 5 16
10-8-71 09:00 09:50 50 11
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Limestone (81 percent) and sand (12 percent) are brought to the plant
by barge from British Columbia, Canada and clay (6 percent) is trucked from
a quarry about 15 miles from the plant. These materials are ground and blended
with (1) percent iron oxide in a rotating ball mill to form a slurry of about
32 percent water.
The blended slurry is fed into the upper end of a slopina, slowly revolving
4\
(one revolution per minute) kiln. This gas-fired kiln (No. 4) is 450 feet long,
13 1/2 feet in diameter at the feedend and 12 feet at the front end. Fuel con-
sumption is approximately 1,000,000 BTU per barrel of cement produced. Durinq
passage through the kiln, the raw materials are heated to about 2500°F to pro-
duce calcium and aluminum silicate knqwn in the trade as "clinker". This marble-
sized clinker material is discharged from the lower end of the kiln at tempera-
tures exceeding 2000°F and fed immediately into an air-quenching cooler unit
which reduces the clinker temperature to about 150°F. The newly-formed rlinkpr
material is conveyed to a storage silo from the cooler.
A small amount of gypsum (4.45 percent by weight) is added to the clinker
material and this mixture is fed to the finish grinding mill. The dust-laden
air leaving the mill (air sweep) is fed to an air-separator or classifier where
the coarse material is returned to the mill and the finished cement (90 percent
through 325 mesh screen) is conveyed to storage silos. Kiln No. 4 can produce
about 4000 barrels of cement in a day.
The control equipment of interest in this report consists of a Wheelabrator
baghouse collector which was installed in 1967 at an approximate cost of
$705,000.00. The flow of dust-laden gases is downward to a manifold between
the collector hoppers. From the manifold the gases move upward through the col-
lector, then downward through a duct to a fan and are exhausted into an 87 feet
high stack with a velocity cone at the too.
7
-------
The basic unit of the baghouse collector 1s a compartment which contains
2
96 graphite Impregnated glass-fiber bags with a surface area of 90 ft per bag.
There are ten (10) compartments 1n the baghouse, and each compartment is cleaned
sequentially by reverse air flow. The partlculate matter is collected on the
Inside of the glass-fiber bags and falls by gravity to the hopper below where
the material 1s removed by a screw conveyor and returned to the kiln by scoop
feeders located 1n front of the chain system approximately 60 to 80 percent of
the dust collected is normally returned to the kiln.
The Wheelabrator baghouse collector 1s designed to handle an air volume of
135,000 ACFM @ 410°F. The equipment manufacturer would not guarantee the effi-
ciency of this baghouse, since this unit was the first one they had installed
on a wet process plant. The effective collecting surface area of the baghouse 1s
2
86,400 ft which gives an air-to-cloth ratio of 1.62:1 or 1.8:1 ft per minute
when one cumfjaruifttfii is being cleaned. The pressure drop across a bag filter 1s
3 to 4 inches of water. The expected life of the bags is from 2 1/2 to 3 years
and each bag costs about $25.00. The expected life of the collector 1s 20 years
and the annual operating cost averages about $22,500.00.
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling ports located on the effluent stack were positioned
approximately 32 feet (4.6 stack diameters) above the breeching Inlet
and 18 feet (2.6 stack diameters) below the section of the cone-shaped
cap. The number and locations of the sampling points within the stack
cross-section used for the three particulate runs were determined from the
Federal Register, "Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources,)
(23 December, 1971).
For the gaseous and SCL sampling the probes were positioned at one
i
of the two existing particulate sampling ports and extended approximately
two feet into the stack.
VI. PROCESS OPERATION
Process operation was interrupted several times during the coarse of
the particulate and gaseous sampling. During each of these interruptions
sampling was stopped until normal operation could be resumed, at which time
sampling was continued. Several conditions contributing to these interruptions
were: (1) excessive pressure drop across baghouse,(2) visible emissions from
leaking bags, and (3) breakdown of dust removal equipment.
The stack emissions were constantly being'monitored during the particulate
testing, and when visible emissions were noticed sampling again was discon-
tinued until normal operation could be resumed.
-------
VII. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Partlculate samples were collected with the train specified 1n Method 5
of the Federal Register, "Standards of Performance For New Stationary Sources"
(3 December, 1971) Including 1mp1ngers as described.
The procedures for sampling and analyzing the partlculate and gaseous
samples are described 1n Methods 1 through 5 of the December 23, 1971 Federal
Register. In addition, the 1mp1nger catch was analyzed for partlculate residue
Including organic matter. For the continuous monitoring of SCL concentrations
an electrochemical sensing analyzer was used.
APPENDIX A
PARTICULATE RESULTS
Table A - I lists the complete results for the partlculate and
gaseous runs. Table A - II lists the equations used for the calculations.
Also shown in Table A - II are example calculations from Run No. 1.
Presented in Table A - III are S02 results recorded during continuous
monitoring cf SCL concentrations by an electrochemical SCL sensing analyzer.
Standard conditions are taken as 70°F and 29.92 in. Hg.
10
-------
iHL>i-L. M-i
PARTICULATE AflD GASEOUS EMISSION DATA
Run No.
Test Date
"„
Tt
p
Vm
Ml
Tm
Vm
mstd
Vw
W
v
wgas
% M
Md
% co2
% o2
% CO
% N2
% EA
MW
u
MW
Cn
P
APS
Ts
NP
p
D •
v
r» _
Qs
9
Qa
a
% I
Sampling nozzle diameter, in.
Net time of test, min.
Barometric pressure, in.
Hg absolute
Average Orifice pressure
drop, in. H20
Volume of dry gas sampled,
ft at meter conditions
Average gas meter temperature, °F
Volume of dry gas sampled at
standard conditions*, SCF
Total H^O collected in impingers
and silica gel , ml
Volume of water vapor collected
at standard conditions*, SCF
% Moisture in the stack gas by
volume.
Mole fraction of dry gas
n
Excess Air Percent
Molecular weight of stack gas,
dry basis
Molecular weight of stack gas,
wet basis
Pitot tube coefficient
Average velocity head of stack gas,
1n. H,0
2
Average stack temperature, °F
Net sampling points
Static pressure of stack gas in. Hg
Stack gas pressure in. Hg absolute
Stack gas velocity at stack conditions fpm
2
Stack area, in.
Dry stack gas volumetric flow rate at
standard conditions*, SCFM ~
Stack, gas volumetric flow rate at stack
conditions, ACFM
Percent isokinetic
4
10-7,8-71
0.250 .
165
29.93
0.776
76.497
92.8
73.449
1046.0
49.58
40.30
-
0.597
18.6
5.0
1
76.4
33.0
31.17
25.86
0.85
0.496
353
33
0.13
30.06
3122
5542
46,976
120,135
106.7
5_
10-8-71
0.250
160
29.90
0.999
84.082
106.8
78.702
1006.0
47.68
37.73
0.623
17.6
5.2
1
77.2
34.3
31.02
26.11
0.85
0.620
351
32
0.16
30.06
3475
5542
54,699
133,718
101.2
6
10-8-71
0.250
160
29.85
1.033
85.656
105.4
80.246
1013.8
48.05
37.45
0.625
17.6
5.2
"l
77.2
34.3
31.02
26.14
0.85
0.638
353
32
0.16
30.01
3534
5542
55,577
135,988
101 .6
* 70°F, 29.92 1n. Hg
-------
i/'BLE A-I (concluded)
PARTICULATE AND GASEOUS EMISSION DATA
Run No.
T
c
rnf
T
mt
'c
can
an
cao
c..
a t
Cau
c
aw
Cax
Ptf
ptt
Unit Feed Rate-
Tons/hr
Particulate
and filter,
Particulate
% impinger
Particulate
and filter,
Particulate
Particulate
and filter,
conditions
Particulate
stack condi
Particulate
and filter,
Particulate
D»r«t i nil a*o
and filter,
Particulate
- orobe
mg
- total
catch
- orobe
gr/SCF*
- total
- probe
, cyclone
, mg
, cyclone,
, ar/SCF*
, cyclone,
4
52.1
152.6
330.2
53.8
0.0319
0.0692
0.0125
5
57.0
192.9
224.4
14.0
0.0377
0.0439
0.0154
6
58.0
165.4
185.4
10.8
0.0317
0.0356
0.0129
gr/cf at stack
- total
tions
- probe
Ib/hr.
- total
r^oKe
lb/ton
- total
, gr/cf at
, cyclone,
, Ib/hr.
rw/Onna
feed
, Ib/ton feed
0.0270
12.87
27.86
n.?/!7
0.535
0.0179
_
17.67
20.57
n 300
0.361
0.0145
15.12
16.90
0.261
0.291
*70°F, 29.92 in. Hg, dry basis
12
-------
PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
1. Volume of dry gas sannled at standard conditions: 7C°F, 23.02 in. he:, SCF
p
V ^-iL* — ^* ^ = 17'7 x 76.497 (29.93 + fjig- ) = ^ ^ 3
tnstd " : '^m*.460' ": ~ ( 92.8 + 460) ~
2. Volume of water vapor at 70°F and 23.'J^ in. rig, SCF
V( = 0.0474 x Vw = 0.0474 >;1046 ^ 49.58ft3 SCF
'"'gas
3. percent moisture in stack, gas
TOO x V ,
f. "oss 1 IQO x.49.58
r:svd v''qns
4. !'ole fraction of "dry gas
•'••! ~ _J-i2. " J-'l_ = JL2^_l'4_O^JO ~ 0.597
I :J '.'
E>. Average molecular weight of dry stack gas
AA . , 3?. r . . 2P-~1
[''•/ - (?'CO x •—--- ) ^ (^0 x -.—-v-1 •!• I (%CO + '-'H0) XY^ !
ld '" "2 100 "2 ll'-J' L " r. 'COJ
(18.6 x 4fT) + (5.0 x 41)4(76.4 x^)=31.17
5, i'oleculor v/oir-h.t of stack qas
'"A' = Ml,'d x Md + 18 (1 - Md) -31.17 xO.597 + IS (1 -0.597 ) - 25.86
7. Stack gas velocity at stack conditions, fpm
Vc = 4,SCO x\i^7T"nTT"7^"5"
o ^ o •«*
r v ~"j"'
/i •} r. r\ v 1Q Q7 -
'rjw'^'J X I -'•it/ 1
1 I1/2
30.06"T25.86 ;
13
-------
TABLE A-11 (concluded)
Ci. Stack a .is volumetric f'iov; rate at standard conditions*, SCFM
0.123 x V /. Ac x M. x P 0.1 23 x 3122 x 5542 x 0.597 x 30.06
^ ___ _ _ ±.-___r____li _ __ = __ i ______
-
9. Stack gss volumetric flow rate at stack conditions. ACFM
n - -05645 x °- *Jls A '6°) - -0?f;15 "46,976 x(353 + 4gn) _
u _ . _.,,._ _ I£U,
ACFM
x 'd 30.06 " 0.597
10. Percent isokinetic
1,032 x (Ts + 460) x V(Ti
%l -
Vs X Tt x Ps x Md X ^n'~ 3122 x 165 x 30-06 x *97 x (-250)2
11. ParticuTcte: probe, cyclone r.nd filter, or/SCF* Dry Basis
C = 0.0154 x ~~- = 0.0154 xi^2_.6_ =0.0319 gr/SCF
>rnsfcc! 73.449
\ •'. rar ciciTi a r.e total; cr-/SC.F" urv ;:Hisi>>
C3rt = 0.0154 x TCT--— = 0.0154 x .330.JL r
73.449
106.7%
13. Participate: proi)e, cyclone .and filter. or/CF at stack conditions
x "
C - r! = 17.7 x .0319 x 30.06 x .597 _ n m?c or/fF
Lat TTS - <60) —(353 + 460) - ; -- ' °'0125 gr/CF
14. Particulate: total, gr/CF at stack conditions
17.7 X C. X P X M. 17 7 Y nQ v TO x
15. Particulate: orobo> cyclone, and filter, Ib/hr
C,,, = O.C0857 x C x Q = O.OOB57 xO.0319 j;46,976 =12.87 ]h/hr
C* > ' Clio ,
15. Particulate: total, Ib/hr i
C - 0.00857 x C x 0 = 0.00857 xO.0692 X46,976 =27.86 ib/hr
3X ciO 'S
17. Particulate:- probe, cyclono, :::;.:i filter, Ib/ton feed
•n - _aii_ -. 12.87 i. /-,„ *-^
'tf Jc 52JT
lu. Part'icula te: iu'cal , Ib/ton
C
P r. «1_ = JT^i lb/ton fesd
" Tc 52.1
.- ;0°F, 29.92 in. Hg 14
-------
TABLE A-III
SO? CONTINUOUS MONITORING RESULTS*
Avg
Time of Reading ppm SOg ppm
13:10 33
13:20 30
13:30 42 52
13:40 72
13:50 81
10-6-71 09:30 12
09:57 9
10:10 12
10:15 15 22
11:30 33
11:35 39
11:38 36
10-7-71 14:35 18 16
14:40 • 15
10-8-71 09:00 12
09:10 12
09:15 14
09:30 9 11
09:40 9
09:45 9
09:50 12
*Readings of ppm recorded directly from instrument scale.
15
-------
APPENDIX B
OPERATION RESULTS
Presented in this section is a summary prepared from the process
log located in the plant control room and the particulate field data sheets.
On Thursday afternoon (10-7-71), kiln operating smoothly with
average feed rate of 52.1 tons per hour during sanplina period of
1346 to 1540 for part of Run No. 4. At 1600 kiln was shut down
since pressure drop across baahouse was becomino excessive (9 inches
of water) due to failure of dust removal system.
Run No. 4 completed on Friday (10-8-71) morning, Run No. 5 obtained
from 1200 to 1450 with kiln operating smoothly. at an average feed
rate of 57.0 tons per hour. Run No. 6 obtained from 1545 to 1834
with kiln operating smoothly at an average feed rate of 58.0 tons
per hour.
During these three runs, about 60 percent of the dust collected
in the baghouse was returned to the kiln.
J TC
ItlUI
had to be discarded due to -leaks in the bag filters. These leaks were
detected when visible emissions were observed at the velocity cone on the stack,
The particulate and gaseous results described in this report represent
sampling during normal kiln operation only.
16
-------
APPENDIX C
FIELD DATA
This section presents the actual field data recorded during the testing.
17
-------
-------
crir-!T c
Air
Oil or lias ^i
Return
'l
f !uc *•
I. J!> i.
Kiln
<
r
Clinker
fooler
Baqjouse
( .
Lines t-one Slurry
Produc :
I
i
San pi ing
Point
A
f •
!.;
• c
D
Type of
Sample
Slurry
P
-------
PRELIIJIfiARY FIELD DATA
Stack Geometry
Plsnt
Sketch of stack cross-section
showing sampling holes
Calculations:
iT~
Calculator
NDvi'-2« (J2/G7)
Test No._
Location_
Date
A. Dist. from inside of far wall to outside of
near wall, in., = $ ~7 ~£ ''
B. Wall thickness, in., = J3"
"
Inside diameter of stack = A-B
Stack Area = _5^S~ ^39
Comments: he. ' ' ' " '"
/v
li
7
» u id . i Of
circular stack
A
J3.-S
&£
3 ?.
21-L
o
J23JL
1LS-.
5SJ
20
L»li>L . I roil! OULb iuf
of samnle port, in.
^-2LJU
7/3
1.9.7
73,0" --
76.7 =
-f-f
-------
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant .
Test 2-
Location
Date /_^_r_
Operator
o
Meter iH .__/_._£i>3
Clock j
Tiinc Point
(i)
-JiL I ;
A P.'inTFT-Ti &P: in, H.,0
St&ck Tuinpt.cF
!_• '^i- i.
I
\ $
0"
J ._?_
_--i—-.
7t.
_/ <1 I
I"
/ / 7
\ v
t-
4
^j>_$: !.
1*L
J±.
77
+20-
70
/v
JJL
(1) "AP-, in. H00 Average,
(2) AP, in. H00 Average.
Comments:
,£ 2)
(D.
MCAf'-29 (12/67)
21
-------
/
Sc.nip "i i n q 'i :>ca I i o:i
STACK 'DATA FOR HOMOGRAPH:
\. Meter L\\
n- H9-
7 P /P =
'• V m
in. Hg
8. Avg, stack ternpe.roture .-
'F.
9, Avg. stack velocity (/'.P) ^
in H20. MAX. VELOCITY,
C factor (1)
(2)
10. Probe Tip size
2
J £Z-±
22
-------
*u : No.
F:\Rf.uN!.,'/;; c;:::_'J f.-\TA
Read and re-ccrd £t •.•.'<•/..•
e?.e!j te^t poui^,
PATHOLOGICAL K-CifcBAI !.'
read six; record iHfiv-y C
HeCiSr Sox Setting, °F_
Prots Tip D'kj., If-.. j
f-Yob» Length ' $J?L
r-rybi- Hsster Sstti.--.:; _._
v GCI-.
! ! ! -• :•>
••:,-,
"f _j.S:.
I'-'-.t:1: \ G'jtlciJ: lb£.-;c
0
/ '*-1 * / ~7
^..^._._.(. _/_c. .7.
.;: .^^^..^
V-
-^.
i/OD
6?
- y o :. ,
j-7.4.
70
i /t
.-2L3.;J.^-.:--.-.-$^..-. L ^:">^
La/5^2? J175^.±Ili&
77
.2.
.1
!./ 0.?
ZL£
7
../
.!?.51P_..L..2J>.
f ""•?'/ ^9 \ I/O I ~ J>~ S^ 5 5 ' ? "5p"
2^2,
, V?
L....^-_..7.2 UJLJLi....j
r.vi. l/^ T/Q? 1
It
.;mj
|Vr«)- ^7-7/)(7/^^(f^^N) - 7^7-P
I . v -> w/ay
-------
j Clock
"-z i Ti;r.o
Dry G
in. i!-,
-------
Part 7. :•• -<
NATIONAL CENTER FOR AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
ORSAT DATA AKD CALCULATION SHEET
Or sat Analysis - Burner Onj-y
Sampling Point location
Date '
i bag sample)
co_ ";
d.
£ Vol. (Dry basis), V
Y
CQj_J?;_ ^ol. (Dry basj s),_ jbc_
00, £ Vol. (Dry basis), V, ,
:\2, £ Vole (Dry basis), \'b&
"An a. .lysis
Analysis
2
Ar.alysi!
3
Wt/Kole
Mole. V?-c. Dry E_gsis
"
32/100
i 28/100
]/ ^ 7ivgt J-'.olecular V.'t.
K of Dry Stack Gas =
Orsat Analysis for Teat. - VJaste and Burners .fFr-r. ba- nor.^le)
mte / ^ - 7- > / ___
Sampling Point Location
Time
Rlin Ko«
•
CQr.., % Vol. (Dry Basis), V
CO, % Vol. (Dry Basis), V,
0.,, -i Vol. '(Dry E«.sis), V
c On
K,, ^ Vol. (Dry Basis), V. .
Analysis
;f.d,
_^
-*-,<>
_2^ ^__
/•jifi lysis
--r-.T -.,---; J
' " i ' " *~"v ~
";
y
Mole Wt
MK/UO
26 / •• 0
2o.l.
;.' = Av£. Molecular V/t. of
15 J Dry Stfcck gas =
Vt/:-:ole
-Ji.lf
•\-
+/.& *
+ LW
=3/. / 7
2o) A. Excess Air, % ~ I
rn.r:crr;v All Arriwcrn
o f.u-..'.-.r- fi:1 Occults "
'i;,) ?•. CC_ Ccntribvtcd by
x h
-- V
bl
by vol. <~-"" stack ro.n oorr^ctci to teot conditions.
25
-------
';
.,
!-.-j, .
2--
Box Ho. _../Y £/:..
/ofojfc^
Psxbt Le
:tn.-.CJ X
Dry Gas T-^r.p. | Vacu^: be
_r..
'T
2-
^7
.
I*
.a..._.
...l_._7..7_.
. ,. 7 7 ...
7'L.?.1-.
; 7.5
:x-.7_
./...
.r/«
ro
.^1.
Vi?~~T"
5"
; //.„_ »_
JZ£J7.£
; r
".&.£//.
Z-^
/ o 17 i y /1:
r J5.
t>! 7 7 i L
. ^_./ . — —
izo*~ .^Wo c>A
, ,. U-30 - ^ c^ ifC
-i.;i( j?v
- 7
-------
V
8
11
PO
-vl
!' i lot I (J; 1 , ! <,;• a'.l
'5* | Clock I Cry Gas in. Kg0 | ^!? i;.-.Q_ _ "' 1i'
,uH "I!
I!";. liC|
Ocuoe
-2_l
.L-
'.' ! -'•' "
iii/l":." I '°?''
r"i<'^/>
L 5
_; :«_j?^r ! _
") xb x" ~ i"
Ji^l___j__
A£_^
301
it
0/^7
I 79
. 7
o.&t?
. 6 7
HlJZ
IS
/.j-o
, i o
/, /
//
74 y
/?/
jL2l
-U-
ill
73) 4s/
^p_
i_^Z/_.
/^il
-3
ji
//
2
.
-------
Part 1. r,. ].
NATIONAL CENTER FOR AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
ORSAT DATA AMD"CALCULATION SHEKT
Or sat Analy si s_ _-_ J3urr^r_0nly_ (Frc:n "bag sample)
Sampling Point Location
Date Time
C0? <•$> Vol. (Dry basis), Y^
CO, £ Vol. (Dry basils), Vbc
0,,j £ Vol. (Dry bacis), V
K2, £ Vol. (Dry basis), Vb£
Analysis
1
Analysis
2
Kbk = •'•
Ant-lysis
3
.-£. Kolecu
of Dry St.!
;, ,.„
/-. V f •
lf..r ',
id-. C
X —
Mole. Wt-
,
,n
3 2. /IOC
28/100
;as =
Dry- '
- ,-,,
"I
-f-
^ '
-
Orsat Analysis for Test - Was'te and BurnarR fr-»-r. br-- err-Oe"!
Date /- - >/ ___ Time IJJ^_^_.
Sarr.pling Point Location /t^i/w, ^x^g^A .
Run No =
CO,.., £ Vol. (Dry Bssis), V
CO, % Vol. (Dry Basis), V
Oy, ;; Vol. (Dry Basis), V^
K, , ^ Vol. (Dry Has Is), V, .
Analysis
1
n.L
£.*-
72 z~
Analysis
2
},: _ =
^ «3
.', - - 'I -,;--• r
""T""
\vgv ••'.-j.l.eoi
Dry Stack t
^lar
l&s -.
'*• ?•
Mole ".•>
M.,/1,.0
20,- •• 0
32-.1-C
2fc/'.
wt. of
V,' c ' '.•'. ;• 1 s
^-- ..- ~T. c-.-i C
•'-j' „- •-•J-'. 0 •
7. 7 it
*
+ /,tl>
+lt, LI
^J.cL
(c-.c) A, Excess Air, % =
(Tr.inr ':'«.•?v All Answorn
= V.
bl
v.
on
db
28
-------
each t-JSt p'vin':.
eed -:;'.'l.c veu'C.-M f:vc.-i-y 5 mii
t r •- •- - •"- <* M -v '} - f :» rp '"''
/". ? -i -. ,: C »• ' * ^ • ^ L U I *:. i*
tinater Ho: Sextino,
;'<:lor A H
C rector
Gas j 'in. [=20
v CF j Ap '
Dry i-r.s
't''(J •' A "C's. ^ i Inl^v ' (
.Jin. Htj jVc.ro. j Tc.r.p |f:rt.t-i j ;
!-,j^fet iCauq: °F ! &F ii:- ^ I
L*3LLjAL...L-2~.
"I
/.e_j.
/5
It Z.
z£ j Ji..._!.
T'/T
±
! 3
Q..J
0 :
-------
Clock
Cry Gas
ritoi:
, i "toi-
TV'g"
Desired '] Actual i Inlei: [ Circ'lct | Gcugs j
:/"«*
. iift
3
5
7
Ct
I &
//
/3
!
I
_-jZ4_
O 'v*
/ /I *
H'TT^
. _!_*__: .
1/J
iUEiL
- Y7 i 'fc^. i / ^7
L2
J.
i /-fri
-3 i^ A
^
-------
Part 7. :•. ?..
NATIONAL CENTER FOR AIR POLLUTIC:: CONTROL
ORSAT DATA AND CALCULATION SHEKT.
Orsat Analysis - Burner Only (Prom bag sample)
Sampling Point Location
Date Time
C0£ $ Vol. (Dry basis), y
CO., •£ Vol. (Dry basis), Vbc
02,-% Vol. (Dry basis), Vfe(,
K2, $ Vol. (Dry basis), Vbfi
Analysis
1
•
...
Analysis
2
Analysis
3
-
Avg
x =
Mole. V.'t
UU/100
23 /ICO
32/100
28/300
11 = Av&. Molecular Wt.
of Dry Stack Gas =
V,'t/Mole
Dry Basis
+
+
-f-
-
Date
Orsat Analysis for Test. - Waste and Burners (Fr-m ba~ cnnple)
'- 3 ^ 7t Time J2°.^--. /*$L°^.— ^in Ko« $ &*ff®* 5~
Sampling Point Location
-
CO^., ^b Vol. (Dry E^sis), V
C D 1
CO, $ Vol. (Dry Basis), V
0.., % Vol. (Dry Basis), V.
c on
N, , % Vol. (Dry Basis), V. .
Analysis
1
17. L,
f, 'L
??. 2^
/vnalysic
2
Analysis
3-
Avp
X 3
'Mole Vt
l+U/100
28,-.'. o
32,'lv.-C
28 /lv.-..
M = Avg. Molecular Wt. of
b(,
4-
+ ),{?4
+ZI.I>^_
*5S.t>2-
(?.o) A. Excess Air, ^ = 100
Trar.crcv All Annw-rr.
= V.
bl
•' ' J^
5) 3. CO^ Contributed by burner, ':'i by vol. or stack can corrected to ter.t conditions
y' V
_i]l
^db
31
-------
:i_£_
C
?.CC£t1C»,
Hex Ko.
<
5 co
i i
. i T^k ! :S-G%
:_. j L±: i._!.':±i:_i _-;.'.
xj.oj
Read
;• son; .if
Sestfiir Box
ProJ2 Tip
Pr.be LL-uj
n.
$_'._.„ .....
Htot | Orifice -!i
y bis
A!)
i 1'iv.i; roc
j T ~ ' ~ —
l j ...
acutrr.
r> . Hg
I-.51. ._:_•
.j_.__
U. L
2L2.Z.
_7_.
_.
IJ
..r_V.f..
.^./i._j_.
j /if ~" J~
7
•v-
,2.
! 3o
|4
^riEir;
3
0
.. .. _!-._
>.a.
-J.!.U> \-.UJ.,
\/&o
,/.. —
.-/'ft.Q.
;#f-, ,
' I L I • ~-~
lA/ilZiLJ
I 'y , / I ^J
tfl:LT'..2LZ-
._./ v 7 _,
'
.!•/./4^ _!...^3_
//J- JL
i-..,Z^C
^/_6_
' "• •'. ';T\
; Uy C/ ;
., /
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
ion l^ig^/oo n.
Location i^iA-^/rv-?
Comments;
Date / t>-sr- *?'
11 me
Operator
/
Test
(co2) ._
Reading 1
(o2)
Reading 2
(CO)
Reading 3
I g,&
o.
NCAP-31 (12/67)
33
-------
Part 7.
NATIONAL CENTER FOR AIR POLLUTIOJi CONTROL
ORGAT DATA AND CALCULATION SHEET
Orsat Analysis - Burner Only (Prom bag
Sampling Point Location
Date Time
:0£ '/; Vol. (Dry basis), y
:0,_ -v- _V:-1. (Dry basis), V
D2, £ Vol. (Dry basis), V
•;2, £ Vol. (Dry basis), V.
bb
be
r
bd
be
Ana. lysis
1
Analysis
2
nalysis
3
Avg
X
Molf
UV-
28 /.
32/1
2371
M - Avg. Molecular V?t.
c of Dry Stack Gas =
Orsat Analysis for Test - Waste and Burners .(Fr-r. ba- Ga-'->.
Date
Time
Sampling Point Location
Run No.
CO
ig, £ Vol. (Dry Easis),
Av£. Molecular Wt. o
Dry Stack gas =
CO, % Vol. (Dry Basis), V
0 , \' V.-l. (Dry Basis), V,
K, , ^ Vol. (Dry Easis), V.
(Tic) A. Excess Air, % = 100
(lYanr :'c?y All Ansv.'err.
+.c-. r.v;-..-lr-.r" of Results) -^2
01
/ i[> ) /. C":o Contribxrtod by burner, f.: by vol.
.r;ar- corrected to ter.t cor.3iticr.s
V • - V, , y V, , •< G
on DO ' _jt_n " >)'••
Vdb
34
-------
-r_ _2_£L__;
CJLA1K ? ii;i.O 'V.:
er.c v^c c.
?ATHO:.OQiC/l
rfiiHi: •:;•;« r/ir.
'/
;f:;.-;
-------
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Date
T1 me QfQQ - //
Operator
Comments;
NCAP-31 (12/67)
37
77
-------
Part 7. 7.. .1. <-;• ,;
NATIONAL CENT.T.R FOR AIR POLLfJTIO:; CONTROL
Sampling
Date
OR5AT DATA AND CALCULATION SHEEC
Orsnt Analysis - Burner Only (Prom "bag sample)
Point Location ^
•"-i
Time
C02 £ Vol. (Dry basis), V
CO, $ Vol. (Dry basis), %a-"'^
02,-£Vol. (Dry basisX'v^
N2, £ Vol. (Dry^asis), Vbe
Analysis
I/
j^
r\
"\
i
Ana 1x^-5""
Analysis
3
Avg
X r=
Mole. V,'t
U^/lOO
28/100
32/100
28/100
/ 1-1, = Avg. Molecular Wt.
/ .of Dry Stack Gas =
Wt/Kole
Dr;/ Basis
t
+
•f-
-
Orsat Analysis for Test - VJaste wd Burners (Fr-n ba- sanp?.c)
Bate /Q - ^ - 7 /
Time
// 3~7
No.
Sampling Point 'Location .^^,^^
(S
-
C02, ^ Vol. (Dry Basis), Vbf
CO, % Vol. (Dry feisis), V
0,, % Vol. (Dry Basis), V
K , % Vol. (Dry Basis), V, .
<; 01
Analysis
1
/*.c
,
f.f
4 7%
Analysis
2
Analysii
3-
Avg
X a
'Mole Wt
HU/'IOO
28,- .'.G
32/.l.'..'C
28 /J\;-..
/I W , = Avg. Molecular Wt. of
-^ ^xC/^ ° Drjr Stack gas s
Vt/l-'.ole
Dry Pasis
?./r
••}--
1 •»•/.¥/
+ 2iS6
" 3 /- /5"
(2o) A. Excess Air,
(Tro-HC !'ov All Anov/crr
+.c. '.iv'-.ir'.r:' <">*' ^".ecviltc
= V.
bl
r, -^
L'^) B. CC^ Contributed by burner, f.o by vol. of stack (Z\r, corrected to ter.t conditions.
^
h
38
-------
Date:
Run number
Operator:
Sample box
!
Impinger H
/i> /TV. 7/f'-'
: xxt/v -^
v- (- - fA^~'\w'r)
number: /
2^
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET ..,':': !.:' •"•'.-:.-..
**' ' ' -* Dl±in4*» /) /T ' "/'"T/ 7 f • ' ^J
y ' • • Location of s'ample port: yfc^L, S^/u>-^<^_'-
Barometric pressure: 2 ?• ? L
Ambient temperature: ^^
*
Volume after sampling 3/Q ml
Impinger prefilled v/ith-^cO ml
Volume collected )Qlto ml
Container No..
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
^'of impinger water
Impinger water residue *
mg
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone v/ash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
Container No. ^3 ". """
Extra No. Weight results
mg
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone v;ash:
Container No,
f!n
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate :
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
dBV I
- Filter particulate
weight
mg
Total particulate v.-eight
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
V/eight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
3.
Moisture total
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments;
Analyze for:
/ '<=
- 2s
39
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
Sample box number:
Plant:
fj ' ' "•
- __ -
'd.
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: t_
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled with
Volume collected
ml
Container No
Extra Ho.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~: of imPin3er water -
Impinger v/ater residue
jng
_mg
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container Mo
Extra No.
Weight results_
_mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
VJeight results
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone v;ash:
Container No
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
1/96? l
Y /J> \ .- . weight
Total parti cul ate weight
culate
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
V/eight before test:
Moisture v/eight collected: /£<-/
Container number: 1. ?.
Moisture total j &Db gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
40
-------
Date: ^_
Run number:
Operator: _
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Sample box number:
/
Ambient temperature: •_
Impinger
Volume after sampling ///p ml Container
Impinger prefilled with^g ml Extra No.
Volutr.fi collected ?7O ml
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No,
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger v/ater mg
Impinger v/ater residue_
Weight results^
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
Container No.
Mo
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
\_ »
- Filter particulate
weigh t mg
Total particulate weight
Silica Gel t\
Weight after test:-v
Weight before test?*-.
Moisture v/eight collected:
Container number: 1.
Moisture total/6>/3, y gia
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments;
Analyze for:
41
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
Sample box number:
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant: _/)
Location of Cample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling JID& ml
Impinger prefilled withX^ml
Volume collected ^^6ml
Container Mo..
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
• of impinger waiter
Impinger water residue
jng
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container Mo.
Extra No.
Weight results^
mg
Dry probe and cyclone c
Weight results
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
frcnc iicu f uf niter,
acetone wash:
Container No.
Extra Ho.
Veyil
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
'
Filter particulate
weight
Total particulate weight
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: ?_£_£-
Weight before test: 2 D 9 £v*
Moisture weight collected: 1 O _I 8, 5
Container number: 1. .2. - 3.
Moisture total
gm
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments:
Analyze for:
/L
42
-------
PLANT
/ /
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEETS
LOCATION
SAMPLED SOURCE
Train Data
. &
Run
jkh'c.
-/ "
-e
^
^~
^
Date
f't>v±»'1t
fo -(.-?/
u>-$ii-3
A3~S 7>
/a-8'/v
Nozzle
dia.
in.
TrS1!- "
.33 1>
) , 2^5 t-
- ?o£
t^5>
~T7eT~l
time
iriin.
~J3
/V6.3
/^5"
/£*
/££
Bar.
pres.
"Hn.
•2 >' C/C,
Z^.'/U
2 9. 13
21.9*
2f.3£
Orifice
diff.dH
"H20
, L67
. $)*<
, 776
,5?77
/. C^-3
Volume sampled
meter cond.
cu. ft.
-5V. 7^7
6 J. 7^>^
?^,9f7
%S'-I 2-
Velocity
head
"H20
* V3 c/
, L 20
,63?
Static
press.
11 Hg.
, / 2
- / V
, y3
. /6
, / ^~
Stack
press.
"Hg. Abs.
_<£. O ^
3d. i 6
•?
JJ, £/
Stack
temp.
OF
— ^s^_
,77>5-
3^-^
^.ry
.7^T3
Velocity and Calcujation Data
Run
Ho.
Average
Velocity x temperature °R
-is. •?*
Stack.
velocity fpm
stack"cond.
~^y & 9
Stack . ..:..
gas volume
scfm
Percent
isokinetic
-------
APPENDIX D
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The participate and carrier gas sampling procedures for the testing
are identical to those outlined in the Federal Register, "Standards of
Performance For Mew Stationary Sources", (December 23, 1971).
Continuous monitoring of the S02 concentrations was accomplished by
using an electrochemical sensing analyzer manufactured by Dynasciences
Corporation*.
*Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
44
-------
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY REPORT
Table E-I presents the participate analysis results which were re-
ported by the EPA laboratory.
45
-------
Table E-I
T" - .._,.**» -
trip to.—
pear toelow: ^ C0ctober
v- ri
Filter
13
Fractii^- r?5 3
2-3
004-4
Filter f '-^
16.8
3.2
110-8
subtraction
r
d to r
volume o. w masr, was volurae.
-i -1 O T t
rinse *.&•' - I
C J2_^-
^c T
T— *^ " "
5.8
1.44.1
-------
APPENDIX F
TEST LOG
Table F - I presents the actual time during which particulate sampling
was conducted.
Table F - I
Sampling Log
Run Date Sampling Port Began Ended Elapsed Time(min.)
1 10-7-71 1 13:46 15:06 80
2 15:18 15:48 30
1 cont. 10-8-71 2 08:50 09:45 " 55
2 10-8-71 2 12:00 13:20 80
1 13:30 14:50 80
3 10:8-71 1 15:45 17:05 80
2 17:14 18:34 80
47
-------
APPENDIX G
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
Name
Howard Crist
James Herlihy
Allan Riley
Clyde Riley
Gene Smith
Philip York
Title
Analytical Chemist, ETB
Chemical Engineer, SDID
Technician, ETB
Technician, ETB
Chemical Engineer, ETB
Chemical Engineer, SDID
48
------- |