MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
REPORT
SOURCE TESTING—EPA TASK WO. 2
ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION
Middletown, Ohio
Chatten Cowherd, Jr.
Midwest Research Institute
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
EPA Contract No. 68-02-0228
(MRI Project No. 3585-C)
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 • AREA 816 561-0202
-------
SOURCE TESTING--EPA TASK NO. 2
ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION
Middle-town, Ohio
by
Chatten Cowherd, Jr.
Midwest Research Institute
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
EPA Contract No. 68-02-0228
(MRI Project No. 3585-C)
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 • AREA 816 561-0202
-------
PREFACE
The work reported herein was conducted by Midwest Research Institute
(MRl), pursuant to a Task Order issued by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), under the terms of EPA Contract No. 68-02-0228. Dr. Chatten Cowherd, Jr.,
served as the Project Chief and directed the MRI field team consisting of:
Messrs. Nicholas Stich, Robert Stultz, and Ed Trompeter. Mr. Fred Bergman
and Mr. Mike Hammons performed the pollutant analyses at the MRI laboratories.
Sections IV and VI of this report were written by EPA.
Approved for:
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
P. C. Constant, Jr
Program Manager
7 February 1972
11
-------
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
II. Introduction 2
III. Summary of Results 6
TV. Process Description 9
V. Location of Sampling Points 12
VI. Process Operations 14
VII. Sampling and Analytical Procedures 15
Appendix A - Particulate Results . 18
Appendix B - Gaseous Results 36
Appendix C - Field Data 37
Appendix D - Standard Sampling Procedures 80
Appendix E - Laboratory Report 81
Appendix F - Test Log 85
Appendix G - Project Participants and Titles 86
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Under the Clean Air Act, as amended, the Environmental Protection
Agency is charged with the establishment of performance standards for new
installations or modifications of existing installations in stationary
source categories which may contribute significantly to air pollution. A
performance standard is a standard for emissions of air pollutants which
reflects the best emission reduction systems that have been adequately
demonstrated (taking into account economic considerations).
The development of realistic performance standards requires ac-
curate data on pollutant emissions within the various source categories. In
the iron and steel industry, the Basic Oxygen Furnace (EOF) shop of the
Armco Middletown Works in Middletown, Ohio, was designated by EPA as repre-
sentative of a well-controlled operation, and was thereby selected for the
emission testing program. This report presents the results of the testing
which was performed at the Armco EOF shop.
The Armco EOF shop is equipped with two heating vessels, each
having a capacity of 200 tons of steel per heat. The process is a batch
operation utilizing one of two oxygen converter gas recovery "OG" (oxygen
converter gas recovery) systems in the U.S. The CO is only partially com-
busted in the hood in this system. After a vessel is charged with scrap
metal, molten metal, and various other additives, a heat cycle is begun
and lasts about 40 min. At the beginning of the oxygen blow, the exhaust
hood is lowered over the top of the vessel and the contents are heated. At
-------
the end of the oxygen blow, the exhaust hood is raised and the molten metal
is checked for temperature and chemical composition. If further adjustment
of temperature or composition is required, additional oxygen is reblown.
When the specified temperature and composition is met, the metal is then
tapped. Each vessel has a separate scrubber, stack, and flare.
Gases emitted from the vessel during the heat cycle are pulled
into the hood and drawn through a series of connecting ducts that contain
water sprays and a primary and high-energy secondary adjustable-throat
Venturi scrubber. These gases are then passed into the atmosphere through
the connecting stack. In the raised position, the hood draws only a portion
of the emissions generated in the heating process; in the lowered position
the hood collects essentially all of the emissions. Pollutant emissions
from the process consist primarily of particulates and carbon monoxide.
The carbon monoxide occurs during the oxygen blow, and is flared at the top
of the stack.
The MRI field team arrived at the plant site on 18 October 1971,
set up the field laboratory, and prepared the sampling trains. On 19 October
1971, the final preparations of the sampling stations on EOF Stack Wo. 15
were carried out, the sampling trains were placed in position, and pre-
liminary testing was conducted. Source testing was performed on 20, 21, and
23 October 1971. Problems with the heating vessel connected to Stack No.
15 prevented testing on 22 October 1971.
-------
Three particulate runs were conducted, each consisting of the
sampling of emissions during six consecutive heating cycles (end of charging
to beginning of tapping). During each period of particulate sampling, a
cumulative gas sample was also collected. Additional gas samples were also
taken during single heats—one in a. preliminary run and one each in the first
and third particulate runs.
Particulate samples were collected from the stack effluent at an
elevation of more than 8 stack diameters above the inlet breeching. The
distribution of sampling points is given in Figure 1. Gas samples were
collected from a single point at a lower elevation.
The following sections of this report treat (l) the summary of
results, (2) the description of the process, (3) the location of sampling
points, (4) process operating conditions, and (5) sampling and analytical
procedures.
-------
01
Port No. 2
STACK CROSS SECTION_
(Particulate Sampling Station)
POINT
1
2
3
1 4
5
6
DISTANCE*
(INCHES)
3-1/8
10-5/8
21-1/4
50-3/4
61-3/8
68-7/8
* From inside stack
wall to sampling
point.
Figure 1 - Distribution of Particulate Sampling Points
-------
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Tables I and II present a summary of results from the particulate
and gas emission testing. The cumulative results from each of the three
runs are reasonably consistent, particularly for a batch process. Only
f
about 11$ of the particulates passed through the filter during the three
particulate runs.* No sulfate was detected in the impinger water from the
particulate runs.
The gas sample taken only during an oxygen blow shows that the
carbon monoxide concentration is much higher at this time.
During the particulate testing, samples of scrubber water were
collected from the inlet and outlet water systems. Results of analysis
performed on these samples are shown in Appendix F.
* The impinger portion of run 1 was found to be contaminated; consequently,
this part of the run was disallowed (see Appendix E).
-------
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Run No.
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM®/dry
Stack Flow Rate - ACFM
$ Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol. % dry
% 02 - Vol. dry
Tons steel produced (6 heats)
Fartieulates - probe, cyclone
and filter catch
Mg
Gr/SCFi/ dry
Gr/CF at stack conditions
Lb emitted/ton steel produced
Fartieulates - total catch
Mg
Gr/SCFi/ dry
Gr/CF at stack conditions
Lb emitted/ton steel produced
Impinger catch - $
10/20/71
^7,065
48,375
10.5
10.4
8.7
27.2
1,214.3
78.55
0.0119
0.00913
0.0115
10/21/71
31,996
43,739
12.7
9.4
9.7
25.2
1,202.7
10/23/71
48,787
63,491
13.4
10.8
7.5
36.7
1,223.8
97.66
0.0145
0.0106
0.0140
110.55
0.0164
0.0120
0.0158
11.7
96.58
0.0112
0.00858
0.0141
107.80
0.0125
0.00957
0.0158
10.4
a/ 70°F, 29.92 in. Hg.
b/ The impinger portion of Run 1 was found to be contaminated; consequently,
this part of the run was disallowed.
-------
TABLE II
SINGLE-HEAT CO DETERMINATIONS
Carbon Monoxide
Date Run No. Heat No. (Vol.
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Armco EOF at Middletown, Ohio, has one of two "OG" systems
operating in this country. A schematic of the Armco system is shown in
Figure 2. The basic distinction of the "OG" system is that the CO generated
during the blow is not combusted completely to C02 in the hood as in a
fixed hood system. The CO concentration can reach as high as 10-75% during
the blow. A moveable hood is lowered over the vessel during the blow, per-
mitting only a small amount of excess air to be drawn into the hood, causing
the high concentration of CO. The result is that the cooling requirements
for the hood are considerably less and the volume of gases to be treated
is 20 to 25$> of that for the conventional method. Due to the lower flow
rates, the stacks, Venturi scrubbers and fans are proportionately smaller,
making pressure drops that would be prohibitive for a conventional scrubber,
economically feasible for an "OG" scrubber. The dust is primarily Fe^O^
and is reported easier to remove with a scrubber than Fe20s that normally
occurs in the hood combustion systems. Seal and purge ^2 are used to
prevent explosion hazards. Each vessel has an entirely independent set
of hood, scrubbers, stack and flare. Treatment of scrubber water from
both scrubber systems is performed in common settling tanks with the high-
pressure drop Venturi scrubber water being reused as quencher water.
The "OG" process was developed by Yawata Iron and Steel Company
in Japan and is being used at 11 installations in that country. The process
is licensed in this country through Chemico's Pollution Control Division.
-------
LANCE
NOZZLE
FLUX
NOZZLE
\/\
V
y
UPPER
HOOD
LOWER
HOOD
GAS
/ COOLER
SKIRT
FURNACE
QUENCHER VENTURI
QUENCHER SEPARATING!ELBOW
QUENCHER
SEAL TANK
STACK
VENTURI
SEPARATING
ELBOW
V
QUENCHER
FEED TANK
Figure 2 - Schematic of OG Gas Cleaning System
-------
In Japan the CO is stored in a surge tank and used as fuel. The economics
of this procedure are not attractive in the United States at this time.
Larger vessels, more vessels, or increased fuel costs may improve the
economics in the future. Chemico claims that capital, power, and main-
tenance costs are comparable for both the "OG" process and the conventional
combustion system.
The Armco EOF went on stream in November 1969, and was the first
"OG" system in the United States.-, Recovery of CO is not practiced; however,
instead it is flared at the top of the stack. The shop practice is to
lower the hood within 10 sec after ignition and raise it 1 min before
the end of the blow. The hood was not lowered during reblows.
11
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The distribution of sampling points for a particulate run. was
shown in Figure 1. Figure 3 indicates the location of the sampling stations
on Stack No. 15. Gas samples were collected at the first level (the north-
west port), and particulate samples were collected at the second level. The
end of the gas sampling probe was positioned at one point approximately 2 ft
into the stack gases. As shown in the diagram, the particulate sampling sta-
tion is more than 8 diameters above the stack inlet breeching.
12
-------
Fan
No. 15
Stack
BOF Shop
Venturi
Scrubbers
PLAN VIEW
Fan
No. 16
Stack
T
t-
l_
3
^-'
l_
0
•>
i
•4
u
><
o
' \
T
- c
4
Lt_
O
I
o
r-^n
0
6 Ft
^ N
> t
— -^
3 Level 2
Level 1
i
FRONT VIEW
OF STACK
Figure 3 - Location of Sampling Stations
-------
VI. PROCESS OPERATIONS
During the entire test period, the operation of the vessel was
observed in the control room and any unusual circumstances noted. Metal
charges were approximately 35$ scrap and 65% hot metal. Nonmetallic
additions were approximately 9% of total vessel additions. The tons of
steel produced along with other related process information were recorded
during testing.
v
The test period was from the beginning of blow to the beginning
of tapping. Three tests of six heats each were performed.
The.only unusual circumstances noted during the testing is
that a "skull" of iron and flux built up around the mouth of the vessel
during the first and second tests, but was removed before the third test.
During the third test, a second "skull" formed and fell into the vessel.
14
-------
VII. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Farticulates
%.
For the particulate sampling, the Research Appliance Company
Model 2343 "Staksamplr" equipment was used. This sampling train meets the
specifications of the Federal Register, "Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources" (23 December 1971). The procedures for sampling and
analysis of particulates conform to Method 5 specified in the Federal
c-"
Register. The method used for the analysis of the sulfate content of im-
pinger water is described within Method 6 in the Register. The procedures
for clean-up of the sampling train after each run included rinsing the im-
pingers and accessory glassware twice with distilled water and twice with
/ ; ;
acetone. The probe tip, probe, and filter-inlet glassware were
brushed twice and rinsed three times with acetone.
The network of sampling points at the particulate station has
been described earlier in this report. The number of points on a traverse,
the sampling time at each point, and the sequence in which points were
sampled were specified by the EPA field officer. Preliminary measurements
were made at each point during a heat to determine the approximate tem-
perature and velocity profiles along each traverse. Also, a gas sample
was passed through an ice-cooled condenser attached to the RAG umbilical
cord, for the purpose of determining the approximate moisture in the stack
gases.
* Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
-------
B. Carrier Gases
The equipment and procedure used for the collection of a cumula-
tive gas sample are essentially the same as specified in Method 3 of the
Federal Register. The gas sampling train, which deviates from the train
design that is specified in the Register, is shown in Figure 4. This train
design was approved by EPA prior to the test. The rate of sampling was
controlled by adjusting a micrometer valve which acted as a critical
orifice. The sampling rate was set at a constant value for any testing
period, such that a total volume of gases of between 2 and 3 cu ft would be
collected.
Analyses for carbon dioxide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide were
performed in the field within a few hours after the sampling was completed,
using an Orsat apparatus.
16
-------
RATE METER
SAMPLE
INTAKE
FILTER
H
-j
C(
PROBE
DNDENSER
M »
IxsJ *•
VALVE
TEDLAR
BAG —
VACUUM
GAUGE
PURGE LINE
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
VACUUM
PUMP
RIGID
AIR-TIGHT
CONTAINER
Figure 4 - Gas Sampling Train
-------
APPENDIX A
FARTICULATE RESULTS
Table A-I lists the complete results for the particulate tests.
Table.A-II lists the equations used for the calculations. Also shown in
Table A-II are example calculations for Run No. 2. Table A-III lists the
input data for the particulate runs.
Abbreviated parameter descriptions listed in Table A-I are
clarified through Table A-II. "Partial" denotes a quantity based on weight
of particulate collected in the probe, cyclone and filter and excluding
the impinger catch.
Standard conditions are taken as 70°F and 29.92 in. of Hg.
18
-------
TABLE A-I
.PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
NAME DESCRIPTION
TEST DATE
DN PROBE TIP DIAMETER
TT NET TIME OF TEST
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
PM AVG ORIFICE PRES DROP
VM VOL DRY GAS-METER COND
.TM AVG GAS METER TEMP
VMSTD VOL DRY GAS-STD COND
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VWV VOL H20 VAPOR-STD COND
PMOS.... PERCENT MOISTURE 3Y VOL
MD MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PC02 PERCENT C02 BY VOL» DRY
P02 PERCENT 02 BY VOL» DRY
PCO PERCENT CO BY VOL» DRY
PN2 PERCENT N2 BY VOL» DRY
MWD MOLECULAR WT-DRY STK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WT-STK GAS
-CP PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
DPS AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
TS AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
NP NET SAMPLING POINTS
PST STATIC PRES OF STACK
PS STACK PRESSUREt ABSOLUTE
_VS - - AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
AS STACK AREA
OS STK FLOWRATE* DRY»STD CN
QA ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERI PERCENT ISOKINETIC
B ANISO CORRECTION FACTOR
MF PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
MT PARTICULATE WT-TOTAL
1C PERC IMPINGER CATCH
CAN PART. LOAD-PTL»STD; CN
CAO PART. LOAD-TTLtSTD CN
CAT PART. LOAD-PTL»STK CN
.CAU . PART. LOAD-TTLtSTK; CN
TON WEIGHT STEEL PRODUCED
PTF PARTIC EMISSIONS - PARTIAL
PTT PARTIC EMISSIONS - TOTAL
UNITS
IN
MIN
IN.HG
IN.H20
DCF
.. DEG.F ._.
DSCF
ML
^SCF
L
Y
AS
IN.H20
DEG.F
IN.HG
TE IN.HG
FPM
IN2
CN DSCFM
ACFM
|R
MG
MG
GR/DSCF
GR/DSCF
GR/ACF
...GR/ACF
TON
LB/TON
LB/TON
1
10-20-71
.250
222.4
29.70
.785
106.23
..._ 90.2
101.74
252.0
11.94
10.5
.895
10.4
8.7
27.2
53.7
_ 30.01
28.75
• 850
.229
153.9
111
-.02
29.68
_ 1711.
4071
37065
48375
102.1
1.000
78.55
i/
- S/
.01193
a/
.00913
a/
1214.3
0.0115
£/
2
10-21-71
.250
255.0
29.40
.616
108.18
83.0
103.89
318.0
15.07
12.7
.873
9.5
9.7
25.2
55.6
29.91
28.40
• 850
.182
161.2
129
-.02
29.38
1547
4071
31996
43739
105.5
1.000
97.66
110.55
11.7
.01450
.01642
.01060
.01200
1202.7
0.0140
0.0158
3
10-23-71
.250
224.0
29,50
1.375
139.36
85.2
133.99
435.0
20.62
13.4
.866
10.8
7.5
36.7
45.0
30.03
28.42
• 850
.400
128.5
113
-.02
29.48
2246
4071
48787
63491
101.2
1.000
96.58
107.80
10.4
.01117
.01247
.00858
.00957
1223.8
0.0141
0.0158
a/ The impinger portion of Run 1 was found to be contaminated; consequently, this
part of the run was disallowed.
19
-------
TABLE A-II
EXAMPLE PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS.
1. VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLED AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
17.71*VM*(P8 * PM/13.6)"
TM*460.
17.71*108.18*(29.40* .616/13.6)
= 103.89 DSCF
83.0*460.
2. VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
t
VWV = 0.0474*VW = 0.0474* 318.0 = 15.07 SCF
3. PERCENT MOISTURE IN STACK GAS
100.*VWV 100.* 15.07
pMQS _JL—-^L -J^_f --r _f L? »J-PERCENT
VMSTD+VWV 103.89* 15.07
4. MOLE FRACTION OF DRY STACK GAS
100.-PMOS 100.- 12.7
MO = = = .873
100. 100.
.5.. AVERAGE_MOLECULA.R_ WEI 5HT._OF_DR_Y__S.TACKJ5AS
_. _ MWD = (PCOa * 44/100) * (P02 * 32/100)
+(PN2*PCO * 28/100)
= ( 9.5 * 44/100) * ( 9.7 * 32/100)
s 29.91
6. MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS . __
MW = MWD*MD + 18M1-MD)
= 29.9* .873 * 18*(1- .873) = 28.40
20
-------
Table A-II - continued
7. STACK GAS VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
VS = 4360* SORT(DPS* (TS+460)) *
SQRT(1/(PS*MW))
= 4360* SQRT( ,182*< 161.3+460))
*SQRT(l/(29.38* 28.40)) = 1547 PPM
8. STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOw/ AT STANDARD CONDITIONS,
0.123*VS*AS*MD*PS
QS ' = .
TS+460
0.123* 1547* 4071* •873*29.38
__161.2 +460
= 31996 DSCFM
3.... 5TACK_GAS_.yOLUME.T_P I.C._£LQW_ At. STACK. CQND II.I ON.S
QS * (TS + 460) ~~ """" "
QA =
17.71 * PS » MD
31996*( 161.2+460)
= 43739 ACFM
17.71*29.38* .873
.IP.. PERCENT... ISOKI NET 1C.. ..AND ..ANISQ_CORRECTIQN_F.ACTOR
1032*(TS+460)*VMSTD
PERI =
VS*TT*PS*MD*(DN*DN)
1032*( 161.2+460)* 103.89
= 105.5 PERCENT
1547* 255.0*29.38* .873* .250
.... .. _. *_.250.
1.000
21
-------
Table A-II - continued
11. PARTICIPATE LOADING — PROBE, CYCLONE, AND FILTER
(AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CAM = 0*0154 * (MF/VMSTD) * B
= 0.01b4*< 97.66/ 103.89)*1.000 = .01450 GR/DSCF
12. PARTICULATE LOADING— TOTAL
(AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)_
CAO = 0.0154 * (MT/VMSTD) *"B"" "
= 0.0154*( 110.55/ io3.89~)»1.000 ' = .01642 GR/DSCF
13. PARTICULATE LOADING — PROBE, CYCLONE, AND FILTER
(AT STACK CONDITIONS)
17.71*CAM*PS*MD
CAT__ = --— ~ 1 .
TS+460
17.71* .0145*29.38* .873
= = .01060 GR/ACF
161.2+460
14. PARTICIPATE LOADING — TOTAL
(AT STACK CONDITIONS)
17.71*CAO*PS*MD _
CAU =
_...• TS*460
17.71* .0164*29.38* .873 _
= - .01200 GR/ACF
161.2+460
22
-------
Table A-II - concluded
15. PARTICUIATE EMISSION FACTOR — PROBE, CYCLONE, AND FILTER --
LB EMITTED/TON STEEL PRODUCED
MF X QS X TT __ 97.66 X 51,996 X 255
453,592 X VMSTD X TON ~ 453,592 X 103.89 X 1202.7
= 0.0140 LB/TON
16. PARTICUIATE EMISSION FACTOR — TOTAL — LB/TON STEEL PRODUCED
MT X QS X TT = 110.55 X 51,996 X 255
453,592 X VMSTD X TON 453,~592 X 103.89 X 1202.7
= 0.0158 LB/TON
23
-------
TABLE A-III
PARTICIPATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
TEST-
DATE- 10-20-71
ro
ATMOS
TEMP
DG.F) (
80.0
"PORT-""
POINT
ATMOS STACK H20
PRES VAC ' COND
I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)
29.70 .30 252.0
~SAMP~~~METER '"" DELTA
TIME VOL P
(MIN)
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 06
1 05
1 04
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.17
2.00
2.00
2.00
(DCF) (I.
284.44
285.30
286.07
286.96
287.86
289.01
290.07
291.20
292.33
293.44
294.62
295.61
296.47
297.31
298.13
299.00
299.85
300.73
301.53
302.33
303.15
304.05
304.86
305.68
306.42
H20)
.120
.160
.120
.220
.270
.280
.280
.330
.340
.300
.400
.170
.130
.150
.160
.160
.160
.120
.130
.140
.150
.150
.130
.150
.090
PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
(MG) (MG) (FT2) (DCF)
78.55 139.34 28.27 283.86
""DELTA TEMP" TEMP TRAIN STACK
H IN OUT VAC TEMP
(I.H20)
.450
.580
~ .420
.740
.910
.940
.940
1.150
1.100
.980
1.300
.570
.460
.530
.560
.560
.560
.430
.460
.500
.530
.530
.460
.530
.320
(D.F)
82.0
83.0
"85.0
87.0
89.0
91.0
93.0
94.0
96.0
97.0
97.0
99.0
98.0
99.0
"99.0
99.0
99.0
99.0
99.0
.. 99.0
100.0
100.0
91.0
91.0
93.0
(D.F
82.
82.
82.
83.
83.
83.
84.
84.
85.
85.
86.
87.
87.
87.
88.
89.
85.
89.
90.
90.
91.
91.
91.
91.
91.
) (I.HG)
0 2.0
0
0
0
o t
0
0
0
0 3.0
0
0
0
0
0
o " "
0
0
0
0
0 „_
0
0 "2.0
0 2.0
0
0
(D.F)
147.0
151.0
153.0
156.0
161.0
158.0
160.0
166.0
167.0
165.0
167.0
156.0
152.0
152.0
150.0
148.0
155.0
155.0
150.0
151.0
152.0
150.0
149.0
155.0
161.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
8.7 10.4 27.2 .850
BOX PROBE
TEMP T DIA VEL
(D.F)
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
68.0
71.0
71.0
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
(FPM)
1273.4
1475.2
1279.7
1736.9
1932.0
1962.7
1965.9
2144.5
2178.5
2043.0
2362.9
1526.8
1330.8
1429.5
1474.0
1471.6
1480.0
1281.8
1328.7
1379.9
1429.5
1427.2
1327.6
1433.0
1115.4
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-20-71
ro
PORT-
.po
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_. 1
INT.
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
04
03
02
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.08
METER
VOL
(DCFT (
307.08
308.05
309.08
310.09
311.21
312.37
313.52
314.90
316.12
317.00
317.80"
318.60
319.39
320.18
320.90
321.65
322.34
323.11
324.15
325.24
326.33
327.50
328.73'
329.90
331.50
332.50
333.31
334.18
335.10
336.00
336.83
337.68
338.55
339.46
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.190
.250
.250
.240
.330
.350
.320
.560
.200
.150
.140
.140
.130
.130
.110
_._ «120
.100
.150
.290
.290
.290
.370
"~ .370
.340
.800
.150
.140
.170
.190
.150
.150
.160
.160
.180
DELTA
H
U.H20)
.660
.870
.870
.830
"1.150
1.150
1.050
1.800
.700
.520
.500"
.500
.460
.460
.390
.430
.350
.520
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.200
1.200
1.150
2.500
.500
.500
.600
.660
.530
.530
.550
.550
.630
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
95.0
96.0
99.0
100.0
101.0
104.0
106.0
107.0
110.0
107.0
105.0
105.0
104.0
104.0
85.0
86.0
87.0
87.0
90.0
93.0
95.0
97.0
99.0
102.0
103.0
105.0
104.0
104.0
104.0
104-.0
104.0
104.0
104.0
105.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
(D.F) (I.HG)
92.0
92.0
92.0
92.0
92.0
93.0
93.0
94.0
94.0
94.0
94.0 "
95.0
95.0 2.0
95.0
85.0 2.0
86.0 ...
86.0
86.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
88.0 ^
88.0
89.0 4.0
90.0
90.0
91.0
91.0
92.0
93.0
92.0
93.0
94.0
94.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
160.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
163.0
164.0
165.0
160.0
155.0
152.0
157.0
157.0
154.0
151.0
146.0
151.0
159.0
159.0
160.0
162.0
165.0
169.0
172.0
170.0
151.0
154.0
150.0
150.0
149.0
158.0
157.0
148.0
146.0
146.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
72.0
72.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
73.0
72.0
72.0
71.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
1619.4
1857.6
1857.6
1820.0
2139.3
2205.0
2110.0
2780.1
1654.7
1429.5
1386.7
1386.7
1333.0
1329.7
1218.2
1277.6
1173.9
1437.7
2000.6
2003.9
2008.7
2276.2
2281.6
2183.7
3298.7
1431.9
1378.8
1519.4
1604.9
1436.5
1435.4
1471.6
1469.2
1558.3
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-20-71
ro
CD
PORT-
POINT
SAMP
.TIME
(MIN)
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02
1 .. 0 1 __
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02'
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00.
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER DELTA
VOL P
(OCF) (I.
340.29
341.10
341.73
342.36
343.25
344.20
345.17
346.23
347.37
348.62
350.50 1
351.68
352.66
353.60
354.60
355.50
356.46
357.31
357.90
358.64
359.24
360.00
361.00
362.02
363.10
364.22
365.35
366.46
367.84
368.88
369.74
370.67
H20) {]
.130
.130
.080
.130
.230
.210
.230
.300
.330
.300
.000
.250
.200
.200
.200
.200
.190"
.130
.130
.120
.070
.170
.280
.250
.310
.340
.350
.280 _
.520
.190
.170
.190
DELTA
H
f.H20)
.460
.460
.290
.460
.790
.710
.790
1.000
1.100
1.000
3.600
.830
.700
.700
.700
.700
" .670
.460
.460
.420
.250
.600
.950
.870
1.050
1.150
1.200
.950
1.800
.650
.600
.600
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
94.0
95.0
96.0
97.0
98.0
102. .0.
103.0
105.0
107.0
109.0
117.0
116.0
115.0
114.0
113.0
112.0
112.0
112.0
71.0
71.0
72.0
73.0
76.0
78.0
80.0
82.0
83.0
85.0
87.0
89.0
89.0
89.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
(D.F
94.
94.
94.
94.
95.
__95.
95.
96.
96.
96.
98.
98.
98.
98.
98.
99.
99.
100.
71.
71.
72.
72.
73.
73.
73.
73.
73.
74.
74.
75.
75.
75.
STACK
TEMP
) (I.HG) (D.F)
0
0 3.0
0
0
0
0 ._
0
0
0
0
0 11.0
0 4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 4.0
0
146.0
155.0
161.0
161.0
162.0
165.0
165.0
170.0
171.0
168.0
170.0
151.0
145.0
145.0
144.0
142.0
142.0
140.0
130.0
141.0
150.0
150.0
153.0
153.0
156.0
161.0
161.0
161.0
152.0
144.0
135.0
134.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
68.0
66.0
64.0
62.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
1324.3
1334.1
1051.6
1340.6
1784.6
1709.3
1788.9
2051.2
2153.0
2047.9
3745.0
1844.0
1641.2
1641.2
1639.9
1637.2
1595.7
1317.7
1306.7
1267.1
975.0
1519.4
1954.7
1847.0
2061.8
2168.0
2199.7
1967.4
2661.7
1598.3
1500.6
1585.1
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-20-71
ro
-4
PORT-
POINT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
03
04
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
SAMP METER
TIME VOL
(MIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.17
(DCF) (I
371.60
372.58
373.36
373.91
374.45
375.07
375.97
376.98
373.08
379.25
380.43
381.68
383.25
384.29
385.16
386.07
387.06
388.03
389.06
390.09
DELTA
P
.H20)
.220
.220
.110
.060
.070
.070
.220
.280
.310
.360
.350
.350
.700
.200
.160
.200
.220
.230
.230
.220
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.740
.740
.370
.210
.250
.250
.750
.950
1.050
1.250
1.200
1.200
2.400
.700
.550
.700
.750
.790
.790
.750
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
88.0
88.0
74.0
74.0
74.0
75.0
77.0
79.0
81.0
83.0
86.0
88.0
91.0
93.0
89.0
89.0
89.0
88.0
88.0
88.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
(D.F) (I.HG)
76.0
76.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0 5.0
75.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
78.0
77.0
78.0
78.0
78.0
77.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
132.0
130.0
132.0
143.0
150.0
156.0
154.0
154.0
157.0
160.0
161.0
160.0
150.0
141.0
134.0
135.0
132.0
132.0
127.0
127.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
62.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
63.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
61.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
1702.7
1699.9
1204.0
897.5
975.0
979.8
1734.1
1956.3
2063.5
2229.1
2199.7
2197.9
3083.1
1635.8
1454.6
1627.6
1702.7
1741.0
1733.6
1695.5
-------
Table A-III - continued
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
TEST-
DATE- 10-21-71
ro
CD
ATMOS
TEMP
DG.F)
70.0
PORT-
POINT
" 1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
~ 1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 01
ATMOS STACK H20 PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT
PRES VAC COND WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
~
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-21-71
ro
to
PORT-
POI
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
NT
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05
04
03
02
01
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
SAMP
TIME
(MJN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER DELTA
VOL
(OCF) (I.
411.80
412.46
413.30
414.38
415.50
416.65
417.87
419.00
420.05
420.98
421.74
422.42
423.09
423.79
424.55
425.40
426.07
426.70
427.36
428.04
428.71
429.38
429.70
430.50
431.30
432.10
432.95
433.96
435.00
436.02
437.14
438.27
439.39
440.37
P
H20)
.150
.080
.210
.300
.300
.350
.350
.350
.250
.200
.110
.090
.100
.110
.110
.170
.090
.090
.100
.100
.100
.100
.090
.160
.170
.090
.180
.260
.260
.250
.300
.300
.300
.210
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.530
.280
.710
1.050
1.050
1.200
1.200
1.200
.870
.700
.390
.310
.350
.390
.390
.600
.310
.310
.350
.350
.350
.350
.310
.560
.600
.320
.630
.900
.900
.870
1.050
1.050
1.050
.720
TEMP
IN
(D.F) (
76.0
77.0
78.0
81.0
84.0
87.0
89.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
89.0
89.0
88.0
88.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
76.0
78.0
79.0
80.0
83.0
84.0
86.0
87.0
89.0
91.0
91.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
D.F) (I.HG)
79.0
79.0
78.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0 . .
80.0
80.0
81.0
81.0
81.0
81.0
81.0
81.0
81.0
78.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
155.0
162.0
156.0
159.0
159.0
157.0
160.0
160.0
157.0
155.0
148.0
148.0
155.0
155.0
156.0
155.0
151.0
151.0
151.0
153.0
155.0
155.0
155.0
150.0
156.0
162.0
160.0
161.0
160.0
160.0
162.0
162.0
162.0
156.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
62.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
1449.2
1064.3
1718.8
2056.1
2056.1
2217.2
2222.6
2222.6
1873.9
1673.3
1233.9
1116.1
1183.2
1241.0
1242.0
1542.7
1118.9
1118.9
1179.4
1181.3
1183.2
1183.2
1122.5
1490.6
1546.5
1128.9
1593.9
1917.2
1915.6
1878.4
2061.1
2061.1
2061.1
1716.1
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-21-71
OJ
o
PORT-
POINT
1 06
1 06
1 05
.1 04
1 03
1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06
2 05
2 04
2 03
2 02
2 01
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06
2 06
2 05
2 04
2 03
• SAMP
__TIME.
(MIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
"" 2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
441.35
442.20
442.90
443.63
444.33
445.01
445.69
446.26
446.95
447.63
447.96
448.70
449.43
450.16
451.18
452.31
453.44
454.56
455.70
456.90
458.40
459.75
460.53
461.22
461.96
462.70
463.44
464.15
464.85
465.15
466.00
466. 8b
467.68
468.80
DELTA DELTA TEMP TEMP TRAIN
P
(I.H20)
.160
.150
.110
.110
.110
.100
.120
.070
.100
.100
.100
.130
.110
.130
.310
.370
~ .340
.340
.370
• 350
.700
.220
.120
.110
.120
.120
.120
.110
.100
.090
.190
.180
.160
.320
H
7l.H20)
.560
.530
.390
.390
.390
.350
.430
.250
.350
.350
.350
.460
.390
.460
1.000
1.200
1.100
1.100
1.200
1.150
2.200
.240
.420
.390
.420
.420
.420
.390
.350
.310
.660
.620
.540
1.050
IN
(D.F)
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
90.0
90.0
69.0
89.0
88.0
88.0
75.0
76.0
78.0
80.0
82.0
"" 84.0
85.0
87.0
88.0
92.0
95.0
91.0
89.0
88.0
88.0
88.0
87.0
87.0
87.0
77.0
78.0
80.0
83.0
OUT VAC
(D.F) (I.HG)
80.
81.
81.
81.
82.
82.
83.
83.
83.
83.
83.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
77.
77.
77.
77.
77.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
78.
77.
77.
77.
78.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 9.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
152.0
156.0
158.0
158.0
158.0
155.0
147.0
150.0
152.0
153.0
153.0
150.0
165.0
165.0
166.0
167.0
165.0
167.0
170.0
171.0
170.0
158.0
156.0
155.0
157.0
160.0
160.0
160.0
157.0
157.0
154.0
165.0
171.0
167.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
1493.0
1450.3
1244.0
1244.0
1244.0
1183.2
1287.7
985.9
1180.3
1181.3
1181.3
1343.6
1251.0
1360.0
2101.8
2298.1
2199.4
2203.0
2303.6
2242.2
3168.5
1759.3
1297.2
1241.0
1298.3
1301.4
1301.4
1246.0
1185.2
1124.3
1629.6
1600.3
1516.0
2137.2
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-21-71
CM
PORT-
. POINT.
~2 02
2 01
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06
2 05
2 04
2 03.
2 02
2 01
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06
2 05
2 04
2 03
2 0?
2 01
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06
SftMP
....TIME
(MIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
__2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER
VOL
(DCFP (I
470.00
471.09
472.11
473.17
474.20
475.10
476.06
476.92
477.66
478.37
479.06
.. 479.72
480.39
481.00
481.56
432.18
482.50
483.20
483.20
483.97
485.46
486.63
487.78
488.87
490.02
491.08
491.96
492.86
493.63
494.20
494.82
495.54
496.25
496.93
497.61
498.27
DELTA
P
.H20)
.400
.300
.250
.300
.280
.200
.250
.140
.110
.110
.110
_.ioo
.100
.070
.070
.100
.100
.130
.130
.100
.160
.400
.300
.300
.340
.250
.150
.200
.120
.090
.110
.110
.110
.110
.100
.100
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
~" 1.300
.980
.820
.980
.920
.670
.820
.480
.380
.380
.380
_._.340
.340
.240
.240
.340
.340
.460
.460
.340
.540
1.300
.980
.980
1.150
.830
.510
.670
.410
.240
.380
.380
.380
.380
.340
.340
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
87.0
89.0
90.0
92.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
92.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
93.0
94.0
82.0
82.0
82.0
84.0
85.0
88.0
89.0
90.0
93.0
93.0
94.0
95.0
94.0
92.0
91.0
91.0
92.0
93.0
93.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
(D.F) (I.HG)
78.
79.
79.
80.
80.
81.
81.
82.
82.
83.
83.
83.
83.
84.
84.
85.
86.
83.
83.
84.
83.
83.
83.
83.
83.
83.
83.
83.
84.
84.
84.
84.
84.
84.
85.
85.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 7.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
170.0
170.0
170.0
171.0
173.0
173.0
169.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
165.0
160.0
165.0
170.0
170.0
160.0
165.0
175.0
173.0
165.0
170.0
167.0
170.0
170.0
172.0
170.0
165.0
170.0
165.0
170.0
171.0
170.0
166.0
166.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
" .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
_ .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
2395.2
2074.3
1893.5
2075.9
2008.7
1697.7
1892.0
14H.4
1251.0
1251.0
1251.0
1192.8
1192.8
994.0
998.0
1197.6
1197.6
1354.6
1360.0
1202.3
1518.4
2385.6
2074.3
2069.3
2208.2
1893.5
1469.1
1693.6
1306.7
1136.1
1251.0
1256.0
1257.0
1256.0
1193.8
1193.8
-------
Table A-III - continued
PARTICIPATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
TEST-
DATE- 10-23-71
01
ro
AT MO 5
TEMP
•bG.FV"
65.0
PORT-
POINT
2
2
" 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
01
02
03 ~
04
05
06
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
05
04
03
02
01
01
02
ATMOS STACK H20
PRES VAC COND
(T.H6)" (I.H20) (ML)
29.50 .30 435.0
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
502.28
503.05
503.74
504.64
505.75
506.85
507.94
509.10
"510.25
511.21
512.11
513.51
514.89
516.30
517.90
519.59
521.30
522.73
523.51
524.14
524.91
525.90
526.87
527.85
528.98
DELTA
P
(I.H20) (
.200
.130
.120
.220
.340
.320
.330
.350
~ .330
.200
.170
.580
.500
.620
""" .620 ~"
.670
.670
.430
.200
.090
.150
.230
.230
.240
.340
PARTIC PARTIC STACK INIT
WT-PTL WT-TTL AREA VOL
"" (MG) " (MG) (FT2) (DCF)
96.58 107.80 2fa.27 501.48
DELTA
H
I.H20)
.660
.450
.410
.720
1.100
1.050
1.050
1.150
1.050
.620
.530
1.850
1.600
2.200
"2.200
2.400
2.400
1.400
.660
.. -310
.500
.750
.750
.790
1.100
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
64.0
65.0
66.0
67.0
70.0
75.0
77.0
81.0
84.0
87.0
85.0
92.0
95.0
96.0
100.0
106.0
108.0
89.0
89.0
90.0
90.0
91.0
93.0
91.0
89.0
TEMP TRAIN STACK
OUT VAC TEMP
(D.F) (I.HG) (D.F)
63.0
64.0
64.0
64.0
64.0
65.0
66.0
66.0
67.0
68.0
68.0
70.0
71.0
72.0
72.0
74.0
75.0
74.0
74.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
78.0
149.0
140.0
147.0
162.0
164.0
165.0
165.0
167.0
170.0
167.0
166.0
7.0 117.0
118.0
115.0
115.0
9.0 112.0
111.0
137.0
132.0
132.0
143.0
161.0
161.0
163.0
167.0
PERC PERC PERC PITOT
02 C02 CO TUBE
DRY DRY DRY COEF
7.5 10.8 36.7 .850
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
85.0
85.0
85.0
85.0
^0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
1661.8
1329.8
1285.1
1761.4
2193.2
2129.5
2162.5
2230.6
2171.1
1686.2
1553.3
2754.6
2559.8
2843.0
2843.0
2947.7
2945.2
2412.5
1638.4
1099.1
1432.0
1799.5
1799.5
1841.2
2198.5
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-33-71
O)
PORT-
. POINT,
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06~
2 05
2 04
2 03
2 02
2 01
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
2 06
2 05
2 04
2 03
2 02
2 01
2 01
2 02
2 03
2 04
2 05
2 06
SAMP
TIME
(HIM)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
._2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
__2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER DELTA
VOL '
(DCF) (I.
530.10
531.07
532.08
533.57
535.15" "
536.70
538.37
540.10
541.71
543.25
"544.70
546.22
547.86
549.53
551.17
552.79
554.33
555.16
555.82
556.65
557.77
558.90
560.04
561.24
562.39
563.33
564.46
565.89
567.25
566.71
570.25
571.92
573.50
575.08
P
H20)
.380
.260
.250
.650
.590
.590
.630
.650
.560
.460
.470
.550
.640
.640
.600
.550
.450
.160
.100
.190
.340
.330
.350
.390
.350
.210
.210
.550
.480
.590
.620
.750
.570
.540
DELTA
H
-------
Table A-III - continued
TEST-
DATE- 10-23-71
OJ
PORT-
POINT _
2 06
2 05
2 04
1 01
1 02
1 03 _
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
_1 05
1 04
1 03
1 02
1 01
1 01
1 02
1 03
1 04
1 05
1 06
1 06
1 05
SAMP
TIME
(MIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
METER
VOL
(DCF)
576.63
578.12
579.72
581.11
581.87
582.65
583.65
584.72
585.82
586.97
588.21
589.33
590.27
591.26
592.74
594.07
595.58
597.18
598.76
600.34
601.65
_602.52
603.26
604.26
605.35
606.42
607.50
60^.63
609.77
610.82
611.88
613.35
614.91
616.49
DELTA
P
(I.H20) (
.540
• 600
.640
.360
.190
.130
.220
.340
.300
.330
.410
.380
.210
.190
.530
.350
.600
.650
.600
.600
.420
• 200
.100
.230
.270
.280
.280
.-_«340
.340
.260
.270
.650
.620
.620
DELTA TEMP
H IN
I.H20) (D.F)
1.850
2.050
2.200
1.150
.630
. .440
.710
1.100
.970
1.100
1.350
1.200
.690
.640
1.750
1.150
2.050
2.250
2.050
2.050
1.450
.710
.360
.800
.930
.960
.960
1.150
1.150
.900
.930
2.200
2.150
2.150
111.0
111.0
113.0
96.0
95.0
95.0
96.0
98.0
99.0
99.0
100.0
101.0
99.0
98.0
101.0
102.0
105.0
106.0
106.0
109.0
86.0
86.0
85.0
86.0
88.0
90.0
89.0
88.0
87.0
86.0
86.0
88.0
90.0
94.0
TEMP TRAIN
OUT VAC
STACK
TEMP
(D.F) (I.HG) (D.F)
81.
82.
83.
83.
83.
.84.
84.
84.
8<*.
84.
85.
85.
85.
65.
85.
85.
85.
86.
86.
85.
82.
82.
82.
80.
80.
_ 80.
80.
80.
79.
78.
78.
77.
77.
78.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 11.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 7.0
0
0
0
0 11.0
0 11.5
0 12.0
110.0
110.0
110.0
142.0
130.0
130.0
133.0
135.0
135.0
136.0
138.0
136.0
130.0
127.0
116.0
118.0
112.0
111.0
114.0
112.0
142.0
130.0
127.0
128.0
132.0
135.0
134.0
135.0
135.0
130.0
129.0
118.0
111.0
111.0-
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PROBE
T DIA VEL
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
(FPM)
2641.7
2784.6
2875.9
2216.7
1594.2
1318.7
1719.9
2141.7
2011.7
2115.2
2357.7
2266.0
1676.1
1590.2
2635.5
2141.7
2789.5
2900.9
2794.4
2789.5
2394.3
1635.7
1153.6
1751.1
1903.7
1943.5
1941.9
2141.7
2141.7
1864.9
1898.9
2918.6
2833.1
2833.1
-------
Table A-III - concluded
TEST-
DATE- 10-33-71
en
01
PORT-
POINT..,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
05
06
06
05 _
04
03
02
01
01
02
03
04
SAMP
TIME
(WIN)
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00 ..
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
METER
VOL
(OCF) (
618.08
519.70
621.27
622.00
623.36
624.23
625.00""
626.02
627.21
623.40
629.59
630.90
632.04
633.20
634.25
635.64
637.06
638.55
640.10
640.84
DELTA
P
I.H20)
.620
.620
.580
.410
.400
.180
.110
.240
.320
.350
.350
_.^00 ...
.370
.280
.250
.490
.450 ~
.550
.600
.600
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
2.150
2.150
2.050
1.450
1.400
.640
.390
.830
1.100
_ 1.200
1.200
.—.1.350.
1.250
.970
.880
1.750
1.600
1.950
2.100
2.100
TEMP
IN
(D.F)
98.0
100. 0
102.0
102.0
89.0
89.0
89.0
90.0
94.0
95.0
95.0
..94.0 _.
93.0
92.0
91.0
91.0
93.0
94.0
95.0
97.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
78.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
80.0
80.0
81.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
78.0
78.0
TRAIN STACK
VAC TEMP
(I.HG) (D.F)
111.0
111.0
109.0
109.0
135.0
129.0
129.0
130.0
134.0
7.0 135.0
136.0
135.0
135.0
132.0
132.0
117.0
114.0
114.0
12.0 113.0
114.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
G.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PROBE
T DIA VEL
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
(FPM)
2833.1
2833.1
2735.4
2299.9
2323.0
1550.4
1212.0
1791.8
2076.0
2172.9
2174.8
2323.0
2234.2
1938.6
1831.8
2531.9
2420.0
2675.4
2791.9
2794.4
-------
APPENDIX B
GASEOUS RESULTS
The results of the testing for carrier gas composition are shown
in Table B-I. Gas concentrations were determined directly by Orsat analysis
and no additional calculations were needed.
TABLE B-I
GASEOUS RESULTS
Date
10/19/71
10/20/71
10/20/71
10/21/71
10/23/71
10/23/71
Run No.
Preliminary
1
1
2
3
3
Heat No.
Single
1-6
5
2-6
1-6
l£/
Gas Composition (Vol
co2 o2
12.0 8.0
10.4 . 8.7
9.9 8.1
9.5 9.7
10.8 7.5
16.4 0.4
. $ Dry)
CO
31.6
27.2
35.3
25.2
36.7
64.9
a/ During oxygen blow only.
36
-------
APPENDIX C
FIELD DATA
This section presents the actual field data from the testing.
37
-------
PRELIMINARY SURVEY
9-7-71
Name of Company Armm stPPi r.nr. Date of survey 9-21-71
Address p n Rnv iQ7n
Name of Contacts M.r Bru<~p A- '
John Barkpr
Bob Fisrhpr
Plant Telephone Number 513 4^^
Description of Process steel '
rated at 200 ton oer heat has
City MiHHIPtnwn State Ohio 45042
^tp-jnpr Title Mnr. Fnvi rnnmental Enar.
Title nirprt.or Envirnnmpntal Control
Title RfiF .Shop Fnrpman
f54RR FTS Number ?ifi R?? .^1^1
Industry, Basir nyyopn Furnar.p (R^F) The BOF
been in ooeration sinrp Nov. ^ Thi<; RDF <;hnp is
one of two oxygen converter oas recovery OG (off nss) sy?^pmc' **n t.hp n.^. Thp
oxygen blowing at 20.000 Cfm last 18-20 minutes ,
Operating Schedule of Process 24 hrs.-- 7 days/week
Batch or Continuous Process Batch
Feed Composition and Rates Charge- [1] scrape metal 30%. hot metal 68% (scrape 70 tonf
hot metal 160 ton, lime 18 ton, and misc. additions 4 ton. Heat cycle 30-40 minutes.
Blow cycle 20 min. Tapping 5 min. _
Type of Fuel Gas and oxyge" _ Production Rate 200 tons/vessel charge
Description of Air Pollution Control Equipment and Operation During the oxygen blowing
an exhaust hood is lowerdd over the top of the pear-shaped vessel. The gases are then •
pulled through a series of ducts that contain water sprayes and a high energy primary
and secondary adjustable throat venturi srruhhpr. _ THP<;P gaspg arp thpn pa^gpH -into
atmospherethrouqh either of two stacks. Only onp VPSSP! is in HSP at. nnp time
only one scrubber and stack are used at one time. ____ '.
38
-------
2 - Preliminary Survey
Assumed Constituents of Stack Gas for Each Sampling Site CO COo QP particulate
r—zr
Possible Testing Sites (1) Outlet stack from venturi scrubber.
/2) Two identical stacks are present with ports at90°. (2 ports per stack)
(3) ;
(4) ;
Can Samples be Collected of:
a. Raw materials
no
b. Control equipment effluent no
c. Ash no
d. Scrubber water
e. Product
f. Fuel
g. Other
no
no
no
yes
Signature Required on Passes yes
Best Time to Test
Waivers
OPEN
Are the Following Available at the Plant?
a. Parking Facilities yes
b. Electric Extension Cords no
c. Electrician
d. Safety Equipment
e. Ice
f. Acetone . •
*•.«. , /rt;
g. Distilled water
yes
yes
no
no
yes
h. Weighing Balance yes
i. Clean-up Area yes
j. Laboratory Facilities yes
k. Sampling Ports yes
1. Scaffolding no
m. Restroom yes
n. Vending Machines no
39
-------
Page 3 - Preliminary Survey
1. Electricity Source
a. Amperage per circuit
b. Location of fuse box
c. Extension cord lengths
d. Adapters needed?
2. Safety Equipment Needed
a. Hard hats
b. Safety glasses _
c. Goggles
20 amps
BOF shop
3-100ft. 2-50ft.
NO
d. Safety shoes
e. Alarms
f. Other
3. Ice
a. Vendor
b. Location
Middletown Ice & Coal
605 Curtis St.
4. Acetone
a. Vendor
b. Location
c. Telephone
Fisher Scientific
'5481 Creek Rd.
Cincinnati, Ohio
513.793- 5100
5. Sampling Ports
a. Who will provide
b. Size opening 31/2" I. D. Threaded nipple
6.
Scaffolding
a. Height
b. Length,..,
EAST SIDE
|7" to bar
SOUTH SIDE
24" to bar
8-10 ft.
8-10 ft.
c. Vendor contractor - Also needSa walking platform 6-1 fl ft. long
Address
Telephone
40
-------
Page 4 - Preliminary Survey
D-16.00
a. Parkway. Rt. 73 North 3 miles Phone 513-423-9403 RateS-11.00
b. Manchester Hotel 3 miles Phone 422-5841 Rate 14t0o
c. Holiday Inn on 8 miles Phone Rate
8. Restaurants:
a. Near Plant Cafe near Yankee exit from plant on University Poad
b. Near Motel Brass Rail and MacPonald's
Comments - Armco is in the industrial environmental consulting business and
would contest having one of its competitors do testing at their plant. This
includes P.oy F. Heston, Pust Eng., etc. Government personnel are we leaned
and it is possible that Armco would furnish most of the manpower if need be.
Use of some type of communication is needed between the control room monitor
and the stack testing crew. Suggest phones or walkie talkie units.
The BOF shop is the cleanest shop I have seen and seems to be well maintained.
Cleanup area is near stacks (50 ft). Electrical outlets can be placed in
sampling area. "
Suggest in-house test if possible with one tester and 3 Armco personnel.
41
-------
STACK.DATA
Properties of
Sampling Locations •
Purpose of stack
Height ft.
Width ft.
Length ft.
Diameter ft. I.D.
Wall thickness in.
Material of construction
Ports: a. Existing
b. Size opening
;'
c. Distance of
Platform
Straight distance before-
port
Type of restriction
Straight distance after
port
Type of restriction
Environment
•Work space
Ambient temp. °F
Avg. pi tot reading 1^0, in Hg
Stack velocity F/M
SCFM
Moisture % by volume
Stack temperature °F
Parti culate loading gr/SCF
Particle size
Gases present
Stack pressure 1^0, in Hg
Water Sprays-' -
Dilution air
Elevator
— Wes-t-
both are th
Stack #1
Ixhaust from
230
--
—
f> ft.
3/8"
steel
yes
3 1/2"
40"
55'
90 inlet
\
160'
top
outside
limited
50-80°
1600-1800
50, 000-60, Of
10-2555
125°
.05
small
Co-1-803 001
-.Of
yes
no
no
— — t-a« 1
» same
Stack #2
G°Ei
vessels
0
Co,,
Stack #3
Stack #4
flearby airport - Cincinnati - 50 miles
42
-------
•4-J S-
ro o
cr>
" c
to ••—
•r- O
c: 4-
OJ 4-
C- n3
O 0
CO
4->
S- TD
O C
O- rt3
M- «
O CT to
4-> C
(/) CJ O
c: i— -i-
o c: co
ID
o
o
_
n: c:
en o o
O i— GJ
J= •<- S-
OO Q LU
O) to S-
•—
4-> C
OO Ll_
4- •>
O CO
j^ a
o >,
-(-> re
ai s-
.X.^ f*^_
oo oo
-------
Provide Diagram of Each Sampling Site. Include the Following Information:
W
Dimensions to nearest obstruction in all directions from sampling
port.
Complete description of all ports including all dimensions. Description
of any unusual features about environment; height, odors, toxic conditions,
temperature, dust, etc. ^ ^ •£ (l)
44
-------
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Date
Operator
Meter AH
i-
Clock
r i ilia
Pont
("0
AP, 1nTH00
I
i
j. £._
_J_
2,
i-—
-]"•"•
JL.
,27
- "• *;•?•••'
*2b
.23, t i
(2)
iStcCk Tiimr;t:/'F
H.,0
I
—\
j/
7 !
nf
_£_
V
^_
i
,./2/.
13)
' 1 '•
'..«.'
'•,. in. Hx.0
', In, H,0
Co;-iT;r:nr.s:
45
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Air Pollution Source Testing Forms
I. PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS
EMISSION TEST
Sample Date '<>A ° / V Project •*,*-»«<•
Duct Identification 80 f? tS~
Project No. ^££.5j-C TEST NO.I /
Recorded by
<- <— J->
Assisted by
A. Sketch of Duct or Stack Cross-Section (Also, Sketch of Extensions)
Number "Diameters"
1. Downstream
2. Upstream
(See Test _)
B. Rectangular
1. Number of Sampling Points
Cross-sectional area Number of
(ft2) test points
<2
2-12
> 2
2. Location of Sampling Points
4
6-24
> 24
Comments; Each equal area should
be s 0.5 ft2, and
approximately square in
shape.
After selecting the number of sample points, select the number of traverses
needed to satisfy the 0.5 ft area and shape requirement, (if possible, use
existing ports.) Calculate the distance to each equal area and record in the
above sketch. Number the points proceeding from the port.
C. Circular
1. Number of Equal Areas
Diameter (ft.)
1 or less
1-2
2-4
4-6
over 6
Number of Areas
2
Z
4.
5
6 or more
46
-------
PRELIMINARY
EMISSION
CALCULATIONS
TEST
Projt
Test
2Ct ^
Team
*->»
C
C,
t o
Sample
Date
4 /^JTest No.
/ 0/^-0
/
1
?/
2. Location of Sample Points
P.
Percent of Diameter from Inside Wall to Traverse Point
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IX)
11
32
Njwiber of Areas
2 (?>s
6.7 4.4
25.0 14.7
75.0 29.5
93.3 70.5
65.3
95.6
> 4
3.3
10.5
19.4
32.3
67.7
80.6
89.5
96.7
5
2.5
8.2
14.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
77.4
85.4
91.8
97.5
6
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.5
64.5
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
Diameter
(£n!) x percent
3. 1. "
jo . L
i/. 2-
SV. *
(,t,$~
(,*.? J
^ +/2.
USE
ft; (JnT)
/5-Vr
ilV^
^5 '/V
OL7//
73 Vx.
80i/r
Number the points proceeding "from" the port.
(See Test )
D. Barometric Pressure
Temperature = 70 °F
Altitude
in Feet
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Relative
Density
1.00
6.981
0.964
0.947
0.930
0.913
Barometric
Pressure
29.92
29.38
28.85
28.33
27.82
27.31
Altitude
in Feet
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
Relative
Density
0.896
0.880
0.864
0.848
0.832
0.816
Barometric
Pressure
26.81
26.32
25.84
25.36
24.89
24.43
Calculations:
(See Test
£7
of /-/«
d
/ .' ZO
47
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project -r» c 0 Sample Date
Test Team C C -t- S< .5 Test No. /
A. Moisture Content P*~e ft ^ , *.* ^« R
1. Wet/Dry Bulb Method
= _ °p> Ts (wet)
//£>// , avg. = . 3
See Test
C. Temperature Profile '(Ts)
Measuring instrument
TB(°F): max. = / $ I , min. = / 2- 7 , avg. =_/_£__£_
See Test ^"^ ]
D. Nomograph Settings
/.fi""~
AH = -3rr64- in. of HO, Tm
, Ps/Em =
C = _ Q . ? 5" _ , Ap = values from G above
T = / "^ J" _ °F, D = in.
5 -- - - — • - • — -----
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project /r? >->v»
Test Team C C v
c 0 Sample Date /
^2 Test No.
'{Jf-L 0 /I /
/
•
E. Or sat Data
1. Field Run: CO
f
.> C02 -
2. Lab Run: CO , COg _^
(lab calculations using bulbs)
F. Stack Pressure
Measuring instrument
Inches BgO -"» . 3
(See Test )
G. Probe Tip Diameter
Inches.
H. Define Sample Train
1. Impingers
Normal
Initial
Final
Difference
No. 1
(tip) No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
2. Probe Length
3. Special:
150 ml.
150 ml.
Dry
Silica Gel
•? / /A s
/ 0 t>
f & °
<=£i~;
& JT<7 ,$~~
2,5~0+ 2-O
IS-Z,
(o
(e3JT. -S~
/7 & . o
5- J2 ^
^» , 6>
^-^. O
* ^s-j.s-
(*3S~, S~
— H/ZTo
49
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project XlrmCG? Sample Data
Test Team C£ * ft S Test NO.
Aj
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
n. H0
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
t* )
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
omment
L-
70 %.
3
2-
Z//
n
5
1/3
.9;
2-f7.
it
2/7
34
/ 1
a
1.1
it
9-
3
767
/7T
3
77
a.
n
227
.57
7?
n
n
•2-
.13
r?
AT2—.
-53.
f?
ft
3
..'(*
..T6
ii
a,
, Ik
r
11
/TO
r
• 14
3-67.33
-53
30 V, 0
102
-f
50
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project /I r >v^ r * Sample Data /oi
Test Team
Test NO. / - 2_
ort
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuijm
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left
Right
Stack
Temp.
°F
S. Gel
Temp .
°F
Co.Tjr.cn
Z
J3
z.
./
3 of. a?
7/
9/
11
n
y
.32-
ft
3
3^7
/I
X
33$,
'If
3/3
'Pi
a
310.0*1
2.
,33
II
m
-3--
11*5
j
ItsO
n
70
6
2.
no
IC
3
3.
33 i
./v
/oT
4 a,
Ox-
7S"
ft
A
51
-------
III.
SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
i/V/r /-
tf
fW )-*ep
~;y -V ( 5
H'^i* "~ Jzhtis*
Project y)
Test Team
rmc
CC -t
-r
R:
Sample
5" Test
Data
NO.
/£
lio h i
/- 3
- • "
-t o — . 1~ r.
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAG
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
tack
Temp.
Left Right
S. Gelr*
Temp.
°F
Ter'.p .
Commen
4
,37
3
4
0
11
If
ft
73
jr
If
5-3
t-o
6
J..37
L
316.33
r
,37
S'-K
/./•ry
ft
s.
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
fo>
Project A rn- c o Sample Data
Test Team CC. *KS*MSTest NO. I - U
/*
fJ.
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in. H20
Probe
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
tack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Terap.
F
Gormen
I
L,
sr
73
J
155
V
0?
3
2,
n
Vf~76S
2,
.33
101
1:1
5
436
If
II
It?
s
1°
3
t/L
HL,
10®
53
n
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project xV>y, c c Sample Data /o
Test Team Cc J#S+tJSTest NO. / - 5
1 emo.
Port
No.
Point
No.
BAG
Ulter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft5
Meter
Temp. °F
Right
Stack
Temp.
op
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp .
°F
Coninen
7/
15*0
t
"
y, 6- ^
11
72
7^
V
73
fo
73
r
;
73
3
fr?
It/
II
rr/> s
3
V
r
65"
ft
37/ <
372.5/I
W/
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A*'\t-co Sample Data /# /- o I ~> /
Test Teamed ^J-^A/^Test NO. /-£
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAG
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp.
F
Coru-en
/&.&&
10
. It
-37
/ore
74
/aa*
,01
75-
,01
57^7
im
H
L-
/o:/c
,75"
r
If
10} if.
•36
/&/(*
3
s'V
•/i
a
77
3
7f
¥
.23
7?
/.r?
..75
7?
/27
55
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Air Pollution Source Testing Forms
I. PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS
EMISSION TEST
Sample Date W?-/ /7 / Project
Duct Ident if i cati on_ B O /=• / S~
Project No.
f t>
-£TEST N0.[
Recorded by Cd- Assisted by R'S-t A/J*
A. Sketch of Duct or Stack Cross-Section (Also. Sketch of Extensions)
Number "Diameters"
1. Downstream
2. Upstream
(See Test )
B. Rectangular
1. Number of Sampling Points
Cross-sectional area
(ft2)
< 2
2-12
> 2
Number of
test points
4
6-24
—> 24
Comments; Each equal area should
be s: 0.5 ft2, and
approximately square in
shape.
2. Location of Sampling Points
"After selecting the number of sample points, select the number of traverses
needed to satisfy the 0.5 ft. .area and shape requirement, (if possible, use
existing ports.) Calculate the distance to each equal area and record in the
above sketch. Number the points proceeding from the port.
C. Circular
1. Number of Equal Areas
Diameter (ft.)
1 or less
1-2
2-4
4-6
over 6
Number of Areas
2
3
4
5
6 or more
56
-------
HffiLBUNARY
EMISSION
CALCULATIONS
TEST
Project X) v *
Test Team * £ -f-
r\ t 0
/Z-T
Sample Date
Test No.
/O /-LI
2—
hi
2. Location of Sample Points
Percent of Diameter from Inside Wall to Traverse Point
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
Number
2 3
6.7 4.4
25.0 14.7
75.0 29.5
93.3 70.5
85.3
95.6
of Areas
4
3.3
10.5
19.4
32.3
67.7
80.6
89.5
96.7
5
2.5
8.2
14.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
77.4
85.4
91.8
97.5
6
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.5
64.5
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
Diameter
in. x percent
USE
ft; in.
Number the points proceeding "from" the port.
(See Test J. )
D. Barometric Pressure
Temperature = 70°F
Altitude
in Feet
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Relative
Density
1.00
6.981
. 0.964
0.947
0.930
0.913
Barometric
Pressure
29.92
29.38
28.85
28.33
27.82
27.31
Altitude
in Feet
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
Relative
Density
0.896
0.880
0.864
0.848
0.832
0.816
Barometric
Pressure
26.81
26.32
25.84
25.36
24.89
24.43
Calculations :
s : 2
(See Test
57
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA '
EMISSION TEST
Project
Test Team C C + /g S Test No.
e o Sample Date f ° /*- 1 /"7 /
2-
A. Moisture Content
1. Wet/Dry Bulb Method
Ts (dry) =
_°F, Ts (wet) =
EF
Moisture content =
by volume
2. Condenser Method
Vm =
» p(atmo) =
cu. ft. T =
01
ml.
in. of
Moisture content
P
^
by vol.
1 + 375
(See Test J- )
B. Velocity Profile (Ap = velocity pressure, in.
Measuring instrument (convert to s-shaped)
Ap: max. =
See Test
. min. =
avg. =
C. Temperature Profile (Ts)
Measuring instrument
TS(°F): max. =
See Test _/,
, min. =
avg. =
D. Nomograph Settings
AH f = 1.84 in. of HpO, Tm =
. rci •
H20
C =
s&o "7~& y
°F
, Ps/Pm =
_, Ap = values from G above
°F, D = • in.
58
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
MISSION TEST
e t)
Project__X
Test Team C C •/- /^ .3 Test No.
Sample Date /£/?-/ /7 /
E. Or sat Data
1. Field Run: CO
2. Lab Run: CO
jr.
C02
, COp _
(lab calculations using bulbs)
F. Stack Pressure
Measuring instrument
Inches
(See Test
G- Probe Tip Diameter
Inches.
H. Define Sample Train
1. Impingers
Normal
Initial
Final
Difference
No. 1
(tip) No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
150 ml. / £>~"£>
150 ml. x a- C>
Dry
Silica Gel (? 5" 6 , 5" 9 .
3it-*t
/ 4-&
2 —
6f7^ -T^
2^*7 .0
^6». o
2^.
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A r- KV. c & Sample Data /^
Test Team^C-f^Jy-Ajj: Test NO. 3~ - I
= 70
IM'O w <
Port
No.
Point
No.
Filter
No.
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
n.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Temp.
F
o.
Temp.
°F
Temp.
F
Comment
x
713
2-
. 7V
11
7/
ST
ft
/
3
O
513.
IV
2-7 r,
fl
/JT
z,
n
13-
3
13
i-
/./r
73
4
r
6-
,5-3
6s?
•74
t$T
0
5
16"
1 1
2-
7"?
6*7
rr
7?
7?
a-
3
V
Id £.17
2 o 3fc .
/J"7
60
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project Ar-v^ce Sample Data /O/2./ ''
7*1
Test Team^(C//£?S'vAJLr Test NO. £- 2_
)
A/.
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in. H20
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left
Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp .
°F
ommen
21.
• n
O • fl
23
7(6
7^7
^
J-
0*
7?
•79
7?
/rr
J/
71
11
.35"
7?
76-
/J5"
I1/?
H
ro
/y
10
65-
n
0-?
I')
Tl
f/
./•e
•35
V)
r/
/si;
203
. to
~n
/rr
.205"
2,0*-
ay
n
/r
61
-------
III. SAMPIB DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project /> x- ~i r ^ Sample Data ^/I-' /7 /
Test Team
Test NO. 2- 3
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in. H20
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp.
2-
r
79
V
3
13?
./r
•1*3
137
1/3 r,
if
7?
7?
.30
5"
?7
. /C,
6
f/
2.
/JT5"
ffo
01
35
3
_d_£.
62
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A /-n* f ° Sample Data / O /I//?/
Test TeamTest NO. 2-V
J
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter "
Temp. °F
Left
Right
Stack
Temp.
°F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp.
z,
. /3
.s7 . 7 <5'
7?
/SO
a
U
3
1
.'3
V
4-
.3)
10
.5
•37
',7-
53'-
71
. 5
r
,3?
/.
7"
n/
3
.10
79
J l-
ff
150'
Si
Ibc
ff
r
'If
G
LJOO
A
63
-------
III.
SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project /J *- •"
Test Team
>" c * Sample
Test
Data
NO.
10 IT.
2_~
ih>
£~
e .
ort
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
°F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp.
or.'.-.en
6.
u
77
5
.If
7?
7?
/
...5V
T7
/7T
a
7?
7f
3
°
pa
.as
30
•3
• 2%
fl
5"
F
13
L
. H
3
f .
,10
13037
13
67
it,
V?l-/
?
no
\o
I'/o
64
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A
Test Team
& Sample Data
Test NO.
2-~ (s>
A/
0 vn r
'ort
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Stack
Temp.
Left
Right
S. Gel
Teii'.p.
Temp .
crr.-.cn
7-
Z,
fj
57
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Mr Pollution Source Testing Forms
I. PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS
EMISSION TEST
Sample Date /0/2.S/7/
Duct Identification BO F /<
C TEST N0.|'
Project No
Recorded \>y
Assisted Toy
Aj
A. Sketch of Duct or Stack Cross-Section (Also, Sketch of Extensions)
Number "Diameters"
' Q '/
1. Dovnstream 7 '3
2. Upstream "
(See Test )
- 72.
"
B. Rectangular
1. Number of Sampling Points
Cross-sectional area Number of
(ft2) test points
<2
2-12
> 2
2. Location of Sampling Points
4
6-24
>"24
Comments:
Each equal area should
be £ 0.5 ft2, and
approximately square in
shape.
_ After selecting the number of sample points, select the number of traverses
needed to satisfy the 0.5 ft area and shape requirement, (if possible, use
existing ports.) Calculate the distance to each equal area and record in the
above sketch. Number the points proceeding from the port.
C. Circular
1. Number of Equal Areas
DTameter (ft.)
1 or less
1-2
2-4
4-6
over 6
' Number of Areas
2
3
4
5
6 or more
66
-------
PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS
EMISSION TEST
Pro.lect ,-4 '-•••vi t o
Test Team C '<" V x?JT
Sample Date
Test No.
ft*/-L
3
*hi
2. location of Sample Points
Percent of Diameter from Inside Wall to Traverse Point
Point
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Number
2 3
6.7 4.4
25.0 14.7
75.0 29.5
93.3 70.5
85.3
95.6
of Areas
4
3.3
10.5
19.4
32.3
67.7
80.6
89.5
96.7
5
2.5
8.2
14.6
22.6
34.2
65.8
77.4
85.4
91.8
97.5
6
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.5
64.5
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
Diameter
in. x. percent
USE
ft; in.
Number the points proceeding "from" the port.
(See Test J- )
D.
Barometric Pressure
Temperature = 70°F
Altitude --•
in Feet
0
500
1000
1500
— 2000
2500
Relative '
Density
.1.00
0.981
0.964
0.947
~ -07950"-""
0.913
Barometric
Pressure
29.92
29.38
28.85
28.33
27 ".82
27.31
Altitude
in Feet
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
Relative
Density
0.896
0.880
0.864
0.848
0.832
0.816
Barometric
Pressure
26.81
26.32
25.84
25.36
24.89
24.43
Calculations:
i
(See Test
67
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A "~ >"i r o
Test Team Cc y- /*?-
Sample Date /<2/Z3/7 /
^ Test No. _3
•
A. Moisture Content
1. Wet/Dry Bulb Method
> Ts (wet) =
Moisture content =
2. Condenser Method
by volume
_
= p(atmo) =
cu. ft. T_ =
m
in. of
Moisture content =
P
•"
375
(See Test
EF
°F Vr
' <•— ^ by vol.
ml.
B. Velocity Profile (Ap = velocity pressure, in. BjO)
... _' Measuring instrument (convert to s-shaped) -
Ap: max.
See Test
, min. =
avg. =
C. Temperature Profile (Ts)
Measuring instrument
TS(°F): max. =
See Test
, mln. =
avg.
D. Nomograph Settings
C =
Ts =
f = 1.84
0 =
0, $
/ / o
in. of Erc
*• /
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project X/ /- >vi e o
Test Team
(04 1 > ? q .
3 5~ (=>
I-C* ~7
O_~~7
6» 4^^ ' 0
2 3 £»
/ ° ~~7
2- 7
^ i>
69
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A
Test
* Sample Data
NO.
77-- -
tf KH <3
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in. H0
L-'
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter'
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
°F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp.
8F
Comment
2-
/Vf
5? 3.^5
3
v
J
6
/.o
6
3'
ID
n
7-
n
5'f
7
S73.57
JO
/•'I?
2-X-
516.30
130
00
-? a
67
Ml
70
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project A'_*• ** e o Sample Data
Test Team CC J#f+*JSTest NO. ;? -
A/o
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
ample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
°F
S. Gel
Temp.
CF
Temp.
°F
Conaaen
V
.37
3
1*3
J-^3-
^ r
3
I.If
ff
7f
f'7
'76,
r
Six o
6
D
! / 0
.(.3
3
/oos
-77
f/o
!*
ICO
•5 ^Y, .1-1
//
3
J*L
10
\oc\
Cf
71
-------
III.
SAMPLE
EMISSION
DATA
TEST
Project A r-r
Test Team C C
*\ t a Sample
+X5i A/3"Test
Data
NO.
V^3
3-5
I
7
/
/\/o M, <
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
ample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
pitot
in. H20
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Eg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left
Right
Stack
Temp .
°F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
IVobc
Temp.
F
5T2..7
O
-3
st
'V
I/
71
/n
I. /
7
"76
-71
, ?3
.11
,1,
0
5*
7?
7-7
7
fe
.r?
II,'
11L
1/3
n
If'O
Jib
ff ft
72
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project X)
Sample Data
Test Team Cd J f
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project /4/~/vi <-<> Sample Data
Test Team £"£ •//fJVA/OTest NO.
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
ample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in. HgO
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Temp.
F
t*
-rk,
,10
V
O
117
not
.1-3
V
ff
7
ro
3
ml
^,77
'3r
.cio
jo.
30
fc
ff
7-7
.trl-
7-7
7;
f
1,1^'
7f
in
160
a
101
lill.,00
74
-------
III. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project x
Test Team
Samplc Data AP/2S/7/
, NO. 3 - £>'
Port
No.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Pi obe"
Temp.
F
ormen
l.
'LI..
/•a?
.3
V
.11
.?$
hi
7
r
nr
•3?
.97
i
7.
0
7.
/
7
12.
f
//J
a
. (sO
ity
75
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date /.^t
/
//
//
//
>^^
(co2)
Reading 1
/*• ^
/i- / C7
/2 d>
/Z -^
.
(o2)
Reading 2
/^, X - /2. -^
?./
}_O. 0 - /7- -0
f. &
1.0, O- ~ /"2. •&
y.°
«r, ^
(CO)
Reading 3
£ <^<£vxw «-^>- *J
tfjL^£^^J^ ^
jT// /- 1-0, 0
3 / '.?
J"/, (*• - 2-^. 0
3/. ^
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Locati on
Date /.
/~r
, *M-
1 >W*
, ^t^
/ UJL^*-
_ .. , ... •>t-»»
*-**
(co2)
Reading 1
7r, 7
9^
9.f
0.4
//>.
r.7
(CO)
Reading 3
^ 3 . 2, - X ^-^
33~. 2_
^-5>. 3 _ /-;> ^
JJ"V
^^ ^
i /. ^ - 2 /• o
o-t •
-/^. -2-- /?. 2.
27.0
*(,, V — /^, c?
i?.^
*7;2-
NCAP-31 (12/07)
77
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location_
Date /
Time
Operator
- 2.1 - II
: 3
C-
<5{
Comments
1
NCAP-31 (12/C7)
78
Test
Z.
2-
(co2)
Reading 1
?.c/
7.-S"
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location, T5 Op
Date
Time
Operator
S
Comments
xl
n
,
ft
(co2)
Reading 1
. r
/*. r
(o2)
Reading 2
7,
(CO)
Reading 3
- Jf.
NCAP-31 (12/G7)
79
-------
APPENDIX D
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The sampling procedures are identical to those specified in the
Federal Register of 23 December 1971. A probe lined with Pyrex glass was
used for the first particulate run. This glass liner broke after the
sample had been removed. Due to the likelihood of breakage of a glass
probe of this length (greater than 8 ft), resulting in possible loss of
the sample, the decision was made to use a stainless steel probe for the
last two runs. This decision was approved by the EPA testing observer,
having considered these circumstances.
80
-------
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY REPORT
This section presents the EPA analyses of scrubber water samples
and the particulate analyses which were performed in the MRI laboratory.
The impinger portion of the particulate sample from Run No. 1
was found to be contaminated with organic substances including stopcock
grease. Lubriseal stopcock grease was used to seal ball joints for this
run. Silicone grease was usedsf^pr the remaining runs.
The results of the solvent extraction and pH tests on the scrubber
water samples are shown below:
Solvent Extraction
Sample Particulate, mg pjl Volume? ml
Scrubber inlet 0.0 5.7 - 6.2 485
Scrubber outlet 1.3 5.7 - 6.2 485.
An aliquot of each scrubber sample and a sample of slag was sub-
mitted for fluoride analysis.
81
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO.
Impinger H20:
Volume after sampling
428
ml
Impinger prefilled with_
Volume collected
200
ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water _ _ ^
228
ml
Impinger water residue 2-S-r8Q
.
-^
Impingers and back half of filter, acetone wash; Weight results 5.55
rag
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Weight results °_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash:
Weight results
15.19
_mg
Filter No.
122
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
122
Filter particulate weight 65.56
Total particulate weight 1§9T§4
_mg
8
_ mg-
Silica gel (approximately 200 g) + container
Weight after test: 659.5
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
635.5
24.0
Sample No.
Analyze for: Particulate weight and sulfate in impinger water.
Method determination: Specified in Federal Register (Dec. 23, 1971).
Comments: No sulfate found in impinger water. Blank values for water,
acetone, and ether-chloroform have been subtracted from the
residue weights reported above. In each case, the value sub-
tracted, after round-off, was 0.1 mg.
a/ The impinger portion of Run 1 was found to be contaminated;
consequently, this part of the run was disallowed.
82
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO. 2
Impinger
Volume after sampling
497
ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
Impinger prefilled with
Volume collected
200
297
ml
ml
of impinger water 6.25
Impinger water residue •$ ,2b
mg
mg
Impingers and back half of filter, acetone wash:
Weight results
, 3.38
mg
Dry probe arid cyclone catch:
Weight results
0
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash;
Weight results_
31.17
_mg
Filter No.
123
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
123
Filter particulate weight
Total particulate weight
66.49
110.55
_mg
_mg
Silica gel (approx. 200 g) + container
Weight after test: 677.5
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
656.5
21.0
Sample No.
Analyze for:
Particulate weight and sulfate in impinger water.
Method determination: Specified in Federal Register (Dec. 25, 1971).
Comments: No sulfate found in impinger water. Blank values for water,
acetone and ether-chloroform have been subtracted from the
residue weights reported above. In each case, the value
subtracted, after round-off, was 0.1 mg.
83
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO. _2
Impinger l^O:
Volume after sampling
590
ml
Impinger prefilled with 200
Volume collected
ml
390
ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water 4.95
Impinger water residue
2.45
_mg
mg
Impingers and back half of filter, acetone wash; Weight results_
3.84
_mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Weight results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash:
Weight results_
41.46
_mg
Filter No.
124
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
124
Filter particulate weight_
Total particulate weight
55.12
107.80
mg
_mg
Silica gel (approximately 200 g) + container
Weight after test: 686.8
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
641.8
45.0
Sample No.
Analyze for: Particulate weight and sulfate in impinger water.
Method determination: Specified in Federal Register (Dec. 23, 1971).
Comments: No sulfate found in impinger water. Blank values for water,
acetone and ether-chloroform have been subtracted from the
residue weights reported above. In each case, the value
subtracted, after round-off, was 0.1 mg.
84
-------
APPENDIX F
TEST LOG
Table G-I presents the actual time during which each sampling was
conducted.
Run- Heat
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-52/
1-6
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
3-l£/
3-2
3-3
3-4
3-5
3-6
TABLE F-I
SAMPLING LOG
(Particulate Tests)
Sampling
Port
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Date
10/20/71
10/20/71
10/20/71
10/20/71
10/20/71
10/20/71
10/21/71
10/21/71
10/21/71
10/21/71
10/21/71
10/21/71
10/23/71
10/23/71
10/23/71
10/23/71
10/23/71
10/23/71
Began
2:05 pm
3:03 pm
5:25 pm
6:16 pm
9:09 pm
10:00 pm
12:18 pm
1:21 pm
2:27 pm
3:26 pm
4:16 pm
5:08 pm
8:50 am
9:33 am
10:29 am
11:19 am
12:02 pm
12:44 pm
Elapsed
Ended Time (min)
2:49 pm
3:37 pm
6:05 pm
6:52 pm
9:41 pm
10:36 pm
Total
1:06 pm
2:08 pm
3:11 pm
4:03 pm
4:57 pm
5:46 pm
Total
9:24 am
10:21 am
11:11 am
11:53 am
12:37 pm
1: 15 pm
Total
44
34
40
36
32
36
222
48
47
44
37
41
38
255
34
48
42
34
35
31
224
a/
A separate gas sample was collected during this heat.
b This heat was omitted in the cumulative gas sample for Run 2,
c/ A separate gas sample was collected during the oxygen "blow.
85
-------
Name
Paul Constant
Chatten Cowherd
Edward Trompeter
Robert Stultz
Nicholas Stich
Robert Tussey
Fred Bergman
Michael Hammons
Henry Maloney
Russel Byars
APPENDIX G
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
Title
Program Manager
Project Chief
Process Engineer
Engineering Technician
Field Lab. Technician
Technical Consultant
Analytical Chemist
Laboratory Technician
Technician
Technician
86
-------
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS TABLES
Contained herein are: (1) a summary of weight data on samples,(2) the
results of the residue samples analysis, and (3) an—analysis of the material
collected on the glass fiber filter. The .data contained in the tables should
be considered only as-a genera] guide.
The type of analysers performed was not anticipated at the beginning of
the program and decisions regarding sample preparation and methods of analysis
demanded an immediate response. The resulting analysis scheme was devised,
on short notice, to fit the general laboratory practice, making it possible
to respond to the program needs as quickly as possible.
Following is a discussion of the methods used in the analysis scheme.
No claim is made however that the analysis scheme used is the best nor the
best approach to the problems involved. It is believed to be technically
sound, to provide reliable data, and to be within the limitations noted in
the discussion.
Discussion of Methods
The methods used for the chemical analysis of residues were chosen because
they represent reliable procedures used almost routinely in our laboratory.
Because of this no preliminary testing nor experimentation were required before
the analytical work was begun and results could be obtained in the short time
allowed. No claim is made that these methods represent the best analytical
scheme for this work.
The methods used for determining chloride and ammonium ion are quite
sensitive. Reasonable readings above blanks assure reliable results down to
about 0.03 mg in the residue sample. The methods have the added advantage of
being able to handle samples which unpredictably contain large amounts of
these ions.
The gravimetric method for sulfate lacks the sensitivity one might desire
for this type of work if measurement of less than 1 milligram is necessary.
However, it is capable of determining the occasional high sulfate found in
some samples without repeating the determination as would be necessary when
using some methods.
The nitrate determination is adequate when the NH/j+ content of the samples
is low or is present in amounts approaching the concentration of NOs". Being
a "difference" method it is least effective in determining small amounts of
N03" in the presence of large amounts of NH4+. However, even in the most
unfavorable combinations it will indicate the presence of about 1 mg of NO".
-------
TABLE E-I
Armco Steel
Summary of Weight Date on Samples*
Determi na ti ore Requested : Weight of materials found, mg
Type of Analyses: Category OES, VAS
Arm-Run 1 Arm-Run 1 Arm-Run
Sum of all metals found, mg
Sum of all anions found, mg
Acetone soluble organic matter, mg
Overall total
Total found by EPA, mg
1.94
0.27
7.2
9.41
18.5
0.31
1.03
N 1
1.34
3.4
0.16
0.83
0.8
1.79
3.4
(a) Includes:
1. Acetone wash of front half"
2. Acetone wash of back half"
(b) Includes: Impinger water and wash from run 1.
(c) Includes: Impinger water and wash from run 2.
NOTE: Summary does not contain filter values.
Analysis conducted by Battelle Laboratories for EPA.
-------
TABLE E-II
Armco Steel
Analysis of Residue Samples* ~
Results given in micrograms per total sample.
Determinations Requested: Priority 1 and 2 elements^3'
Type
of Analysis: Optical emission spectrography (OES)
Element Arm-Run r '
Hg
Be
Cd
As
V
Mn
Ni
Sb
Cr
Zn
Cu
Co I 6
«JC » '
B/ X
F(e)
Li
Ag
Sn
Fe
Sr
Na
K
Ca
Si
Mg
Co
Ti
Ba
Al
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
2.
<0.1
<5.
<10.
<3.
30.
2.
<5.
5.
100.
10.
30.
3.
<30.
0.5
<5.
1000!
<5.
100.
30.
50.
500.
20.
<1 .
3.
1.
50.
Elements other than priority
Includes: 1. Acetone rinse
Includes: Impinger water and
Includes: Iiiiuinger water and
Not determined by this method
Arm-Run 1 ^c'
0.3
<0. 1
<5.
<10.
<3.
1.
<1 .
<5.
<1 .
<10.
<1 .
<5.
1.
<30.
<0.1
<5.
10.
<5.
100.
20. .
30.
50.
50.
<1 .
<1 .
<1 .
50.
Arm-Run 2(d)
0.3
-------
TABLE >I 11
Armco Steel
Analysis Results of Residue Samples*
Types of Analyses:
Analysis for
so4=
Cl
NH4+
NO/
Organics^6'
PH
•t ^
: Category Visual Absorption Spectrography (VAS)^3'
Arm-Run r '
<0.5
0.24
0.03
<0.1
7.2
5.5
Arm-Run rc'
0.8
0.23
<0.03
<0.1
Nil
5.5
Arm-Run 2^ '
0.6
0.23
<0.03
<0.1
0.8
6.2
(a) Results of water soluble portion of total sample. Results given in
milligrams (except pH). __~
(b) Includes:
1. Acetone rinse of front half.
2. Acetone rinse of back half.
(c) Includes: Impinger water and wash from run 1.
(d) Includes: Impinger water and wash from run 2.
(e) Acetone soluble.
* Analysis conducted by Battelle Laboratories for EPA.
-------
TABLE E-IV
Armco Steel
Analysis of Material Collected on Glass Fiber Filter*
Determinations Requested: Priority 1 and 2 elements', pH, anions
Type of Analyses: Optical Emission Spectrography and Chemical
(Category Visual Absorption)
Results expressed as ug per complete filter circle
Element
Hg
Be
Cd
As
V
Mn
Ni
Sb
Cr
Zn
Cu
Pb(b)
F(b)
Li
Ag
Sn
Fe
Sr
Na
K
Ca
Si
Mg
Co
Ti
Ba
Al
Arm-Run 1 Blank(a)
52.
<1 .
<20.
<50.
<5.
260.
5.
<13.
13.
7800.
13.
780.
3,000.
<50.
5.
• 5";
5,200. - -
20.
8,000.
5,000.
8,000.
Major (c)
3,000.
<3.
8.
260.
5,000.
(a) Blank filters were not submitted for analysis.
Blank values not subtracted from run data.
(b) Not determined by this method.
(c) Major element in composition of filter.
* Analysis conducted by Battelle Laboratories for EPA.
-------
OTHER BASIC DXYGKN FURNACE LOCATIONS
TESTED BY EPA
LOCATION
I
Alan Wood Steel Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
United States Steel Lorain, Ohio
National Steel Weirton,, West Virginia
Bethlehem Steel Bethleheo, Pennsylvania
-------
OTHER BASIC OXYGEN FURNACE LOCATIONS
TESTED BY EPA
PLANT LOCATION
il Mlddletovn. Ohio''
Alan Wood Steel Conahohocken, Pennsylvania
United SCatc* Steel Lorain, Ohio
National Steel Ueirton, West Virginia
Bethlehea Steel Bethlehea, Pennsylvania
------- |