EPA TEST NUMBER
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
LORAIN, OHIO
CONTRACT NO. 68-02-0225
TASK NO. 6
BY
ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC.
600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE. N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C.
PHONE NO. (202) 338-4277
MARCH 7, 1972
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE ' PAGE
I PREFACE i
II INTRODUCiX.i - " ' _ 2
III DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY 4
OF RESULTS
• j - »Ji"
IV PROCESS DESCRIPTION ' 8
V LOCATION OF SAMPLING PORTS 10
VI PROCESS OPERATION 14
t
VII SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL 15
PROCEDURES
tlNM
APPENDIXES
A PARTICULATE RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
B GASEOUS RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
C FIELD DATA
D LABORATORY REPORT
E TEST LOG
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
-------
I. PREFACE
The work herein was conducted by Engineering Science, Inc.
(ES) pursuant to Task Order No.6 iss'ueU by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under the terms of Contract No.68-02-0225
Mr. Michael E. Lukey served as the Project Engineer and directed
the ES field team consisting of: Messrs. Paul Koch, John Chehaske,
and Douglas Epps. Mr. Chehaske directed the lab analyses at the
Commonwealth Laboratory located in Richmond, Va. Mr. Lukey directed
the preparation of the report.
APPROVED FOR
ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC.
M. DEAN HIGH, MANAGER
AIR QUALITY DIVISION
MARCH 7, 1972
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Under the Clean Air Act, as amended, the Environmental Protection
Agency is charged with the establishment of performance standards for
new installations or modifications of existing installations in station-
ary source categories which may contribute significantly to air pollution.
A performance standard is a standard for emissions of air pollutants
which reflects the best emission reduction systems that have been ad-
equately demonstrated (taking into account economic considerations.)
The development of realistic performance standards requires accurate
data on pollutant emissions within the varioi.s source categories. In
the iron and steel industry, the Basic Oxygen Process (BOP) shop of the
United States Steel (U.S. Steel) in Lorain, Ohio was designated by EPA
as representative of a well controlled operation, and was thereby
seiecced for the emission testing program. This report presents the re-
sults of the testing which was performed at the U.S. Steel BOP shop.
The U.S. Steel BOP shop is equipped with the two heating vessels
(east and west), each having a capacity of 220 tons of steel per heat.
The process is a batch operation utilizing one of two oxygen converter
gas recovery ("OG") systems in the U.S. The CO is only partially com-
busted in the hood in this system. After a vessel is charged with scrap
metal, molten metal, and various other additives, a heat cycle is begun
and lasts about 40 minutes. At the beginning of the oxygen blow, the
exhaust hood is lowered over the top of the vessel and the contents are
heated. At the end of the oxygen blow, the exhaust hood is raised and
the molten metal is checked for temperature and chemical composition.
If further adjustment of temperature or composition is required ad-
ditional oxygen is reblown. When the specified temperature and com-
position is met the metal is then tapped. Each vessel has a separate
fflM.
-------
scrubber, stack and flare.
The test were conducted by Engineering-Science, Inc. Washington, D.C.
during the week of November 15, 1971. The test team utilized the recom-
mended source test procedures issued in the December 23, 1971 Federal
Register (Staad^i^i'vii?i*'-ftV5j"-i':dnce for New Stationary Sources).
On the spot monitoring was performed to determine any unusual cir-
cumstance that wou'icl-nvfliJihc- the results of the testing. Testing was
- .-'.<.:;'^..'••
•neither performed during irregular operating conditions nor during first
heats of a vessel on the test day.
Three particulate runs were conducted, each consisting of the sam-
pling of emissions during six heat cycles (end of charging to beginning
of tapping). During each period of particulate sampling a cumulative
gas sample was also collected. Three additional gas samples were taken
during single heats only.
The test team and EPA are greatly indebted to Messers. L.J. Sauter,
J.W. Turnage, R.C. Stinson and H.I. Sutman of U.S. Steel Corporation
for their cooperation in the sampling program. The following sections
of this report treat (1) the summary of results, (2) the description of
the process, (3) the location of sampling points, (4) process .operating
conditions and (5) sampling and analytical procedures.
-------
III. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The test teams arrived at the plant on Monday afternoon, Nov.
15, 1971, met with selected U.S. Steel engineers and began assembling
the test equipment. The test team used E.S.'s Research Appliance
*
Company stack sampler and a custom-built box to accomodate the num-
erous physical obstructions in the sampling path. The sample train
was calibrated during the week of Oct. 18, 1971 in E.S.'s Washington
office. Gas determinations were made by collecting an integrated sample
during six heats and analyzing with an Orsat unit. In addition, three
grab samples were taken to estimate high and low C0_, 0_ and CO con-
centrations. While CO^ and 0- results from these grab samples were
nearly the same as the averaged integrated samples, the carbon monoxide
concentration was higher, reaching about 50% by volume. During the
tests an EPA chemist continuously monitored the stack gases for CO^,
0?, and CO by infrared analysis.
The newly-installed (early 1971) BOP furnaces and the twin stage
venturi scrubbers ran without mechanical interruption during the three
test days. All except one heat was made on the east furnace/scrubber/
stack. The preliminary velocity traverse indicated that a % inch diameter
probe tip should be used. This tip allowed a sampling rate of about 0.8
cfm. The sampling time for each test was about 2% hours.
* Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute en-
dorsement by EPA.
-------
Tables I and II present a summary of results from the particulate
and gas emission testing. The cumulative results from each of the
three runs are reasonably consistent, particularly for a batch process.
In addition to the particulate mass and gas determinations a subsequent
analysis was made for sulfates (oJ. ) in the impinger solution. About
1.2 mg. of(SO, ) was found in the solution.
During the particulate testing, samples of scrubber water were
collected from the inlet and outlet water systems. Results of analysis
performed on these samples are shown in Appendix D.
The complete summary results of the test may be found in Table A-I
followed by an example calculation of Run 1 i.i Table A-II.
-------
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Run Number
Date
% Isokinetic
Vol. of dry gas sampled /L
Stack Flow Rate-SCFM* dry
Stack Flow Rate- ACFM wet
7, C0_ -Vol. 7» dry
7o 02 -Vol. 7. dry
7» CO -Vol. 7» dry
Tons Steel Produced (6 Heats)
Sulfate analysis S, as SO. in mg
PARTICIPATES
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
mg
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs/ton steel produced
TOTAL CATCH
mg
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs/ton steel produced
% Impinger catch
USS-1 '
11/16/71
122.7
58,880
74,595
13.0
8.0
27.0
1330.95
0.64
15.7
0.00197
0.00155
0.00202
40.7
0.00511
0.00403
0.00524
61.4
USS-2
11/17/71
111.2
57,808
73,182
19.2
7.3
22.0
1321.3
1.64
64.0
0.00887
0.00700
0.00827
104.6
0.0145
0.0114
0.0135
38.8
USS-3
11/18/71
I&U
128.5
59,621
74,397
20.8
7.6
19.0
1298.5
1.46.
23.2
0.00278
0.00222
0.00307
38.9
0.00466
0.00373
0.00515
40.4
*70 F, 29.92" llg
-------
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF GASEOUS RESULTS
Single-Heat Determinations
CARBON DIOXIDE OXYGEN CARBON MONOXIDE
DATE TIME (VOL. % DRY) (VOL % DRY) - (VOL % DRY)
11/16/71 5:05 p.m. 20.6 1.3 > 50
11/17/71 3:00 p.m. 16.4 6.9 > 50
11/18/71 3:00 p.m. 16.6 7.2 > 50
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
U.S. Steel in Lorain, Ohio has one of two "OG" systems operating in
this country. The basic distinction of the "OG" System is that the CO
generated during the blow is not combusted completely to CO in the hood
as in a fixed hood system. The CO concentration can reach as high as
70 - 757o during the blow. A moveable hood is lowered over the vessel
during the blow permitting only a small amount of excess air to be drawn
into the hood, causing a high concentration of CO. The result is that
the cooling requirements for the hood are considerable less and the vol-
ume of gases to be treated is 20 to 257o of that for the conventional
method. Due to the lower flow rates, the stacks, venturi scrubbers and
fans are proportionately smaller, making pressure drops that would be
prohibitive for a conventional scrubber economically feasible for an
"OG" systemv The dust is primarily Fe_0, and is reported easier to
remove with a scrubber than the Fe-0, that normally is produced in the
£4
hood combustion systems. Seal and purge N« are used to prevent explosion
hazards. Each vessel has an entirely independent set of hood, scrubber,
stack and flare. Treatment of scrubber water from both scrubber systems
is performed in common settling tanks with the high pressure drop venturi
scrubber water being reused as quencher water.
The "OG" process was developed by Yawata Iron & Steel Company in
Japan and is being used at 11 installations in that country. The process
is licensed in this country through Chemico's Pollution Control Division.
In Japan the CO is stored in a surge tank and used as fuel. The economics
of this procedure are not attractive in the United States at this time.
Larger vessels, more vessels in one shop, or increased fuel costs may im-
prove the economics in the future. Chemico claims that capital, power
8
-------
and maintenance costs are comparable for both the "OG" process and the
conventional combustion system.
The U.S. Steel BOP at Lorain went on stream in early 1971 and was
the second "OG" system in the Unitu-.'^i'I^uis. Recovery of CO is not
practiced. Instead it is flared at the top of the stack. The shop
practice was to lower the hood 10 scrr.vHS after ignition and raise it
1 minute before the end of the blow. '"The hood was not lowered during
reblows.
-------
.V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling ports were located on the first level of the scrubber,
about 43 feet above ground, ( Figure V-l ). Sampling ports were al-
ready installed on the two stacks, 84 inches above a steel'catwalk (see
Figure V-2). The two ports on each stack were made of 4 inch pipe sle-
'•v . •
eves that protruded 3 to 4 inches outward, and were located at 90 angles.
The ports were positioned approximately 34 feet (5.6 diameters) of straight
run above the breeching into the stack and 171 feet (28.5 diameters) be-
low the stack outlet.
The stack was 72 inches inside diameter and made of 5/8 inch steel.
No lining or vanes were located in the stack to interfere with gas flows.
Pipes, steel girders, valves, gauges, meters, and other venturi-related
r> r\ n f- -v n 1 o IT c f~ £>m c r.i n •*- o r»r»OTt"i/"\nor1 noo-r f-li o ot*or-rfo r* rvt" f- o •pT-e»eont--ir»rr r> T- r*T-» —
~ j .. r — ~ r ~-~ 3 £• *- ' • —o A
lems in manuvering the sampling equipment.
The identification and distribution of sampling point locations used
for the particulate runs are shown in Figure V-3.
The gas sampling probe was positioned at one point reaching ap-
proximately 2 feet into the stack.
10
-------
6'ID
3/8-us. «a-
10'
161'
Eh-- 1
34'
6'OD
FIGURE V-l. LOCATION OF SA.^PLING PORTS
11
-------
VALVES
48
5--
84"
FIGURE V-2. LOCATION OF SAMPLING PORTS
1.2
-------
EAST STACK
•72IN.;
u>
6 15 14 13 12 II 10
PORT I
POINT
1
2
3
r*-.
'•£
•;•
i .
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16
DISTANCE*
(INCHES)
1 1/2
31/2
6
&>: 9
£ !2 1/8
^',53/4
f; 22
•'. 27
45
51 5/8
561/8
59 3/4
63
65 3/4
68 1/2
705/8
•FROM INSIDE STACK WALL
TO SAMPLING POINT
PORT 2
FIGURE V-3. DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICULATE SAMPLING POINTS
-------
VI. PROCESS OPERATION - U.S. STEEL IN LORAIN, OHIO
During the entire test period the operation of the furnace was
observed from the BOP control room. Periodic checks on all flows
and instrument readings of the exhaust and pollution control equipment
were made as well as a record of production variables. Testing con-
sisted of three tests of six heats each. The only unusual occurance
was the interchange of units for one heat in test number 3. Thus
one heat was on the plant's westside vessel and the other seventeen
heats were on the East vessel.
To insure representative sampling the first heat on a cold vessel
was not tested. No visible emissions from the stack were observed
during the entire test program.
14
-------
VII. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The number of required particulate sampling points were determined
by Method 1 contained in the Federal Register (Standards of Performances
for New Stationary Sources, 23 December, 1971). The sampling time at
each point and the sequence in which points were sampled were specified
by the EPA field .officer.
Based on the number of duct diameters downstream from inlet breeching
to port it was calculated that 32 traverse points were required. Pre-
liminary measurements were made at each point during a heat to determine
the approximate temperatures and velocity profiles along each axis. An
initial run for stack moisture content was performed and on the basis of
this and the preliminary traverse data, isokinetic sampling rates were
determined.
For the particulate sampling the Research Appliance Company (RAG)
Model 2343 "Staksamplr" equipment was used.* Because of the configu-
ration of the stack, the surrounding pipes, platforms, steel girders,
etc., the sample box could not be attached directly to the probe. In-
stead, under the direction of the EPA officer, ES made a special box
mounted on the glass probe to overcome this situation. The box contained
the filter, heater, and thermostat control (See Figure VII-1). To con-
nect the filter inside the box with the normally-used RAG sample box,
ES was directed to use Teflon* tubing, but clue to • procurement delays
Tygon* tubing was substituted. Because of possible contamination the
tubing was rinsed only with distilled H_0 and not acetone.
* Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute en-
dorsement by EPA.
15
-------
1- 2
13
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
IS.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
PARTS LIST
Buttonhook-type probe tip
Stainless Steel Coupling
Probe
( deleted )
Fritted Glass Filter Holder
Heated Sample Box
Ice Bath
Modified G-S Impinger
G-S Impinger
Modified G-S Impinger
Modified G-S Impinger
Thermometer
Check Valve
Umbilical Cord
Vacuum gauge
Needle Valve
Vacuum Pump
By-Pass Valve
Dry Gas Meter
Calibrated Orifice
Inclined-Vertical Manometer
Pitot Tube
Teflon Tubing
FIGURE VII-1 PARTICULATE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
Before each test, leak checks were made on the sanpling equipment;
all were less than 0.02 cfm at 15 in. Hg vacuum. The team recorded
readings every two minutes as specified by the project officer.
The particulate testing ran without incident unitl the second day
when the probe developed an electrical short. The testing was stopped
after completion of the heat and the probe wiring was repaired.
Cleanup for each run included rinsing the impingers and accessory
glassware twice with distilled tLO and twice with acetone. The probe
and front half of the filter were brushed and rinsed twice with acetone.
The tygon tubing, as stated above, was rinsed twice with distilled
H-O only. Otherwise the procedures for sampling and analysis of the
particulates conformed to Method 5 specified in the Federal Register.
The equipment and procedure used for the collection of the cummulative
gas samples were essentially the same as specified in the Register,
Method 3. The rate of sampling was controlled by adjusting n np.p.rll R
valve which acted as an orifice. The sampling rate was set at a con-
stant value for each testing period, such that a total volume of gases
between 2 and 3 cu. ft. was collected in a Mylar* bag.
Analyses for carbon dioxide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide were per-
i
formed in the field within a few hours after the sampling was completed,
using an Orsat apparatus.
The method used for sulfate analysis of the impinger water is des-
cribed within Method 6 of the Federal Register.
* Trade name
17
-------
APPENDIX A
PARTICULATE RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Table A-I lists the complete ,:.--,ults for the particulate tests.
Table A-II lists the equations used for the calculations. Also
shown in Table A-II are example calculations for Run No. 1.
-------
.TABLE A-I
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN NO. USS-1 USS-2 USS-3
D Sampling nozzle diameter, in in. 0.250 0.250 0.250
T Net time of test, in min. 162 149 168
b Barometric pressure, in. Hg 29.62 29.54 29.^4
absolute J?
p
m Average Orifice pressure . 2.04 1.98 2.09
drop, in. H-0
V Volume of dry gas sampled,
m ft3 at meter conditions 125.724 115.312 135.185
T Average gas meter temperature .... -. oc A «o n
m OF
Vm Volume of dry gas sampled, 122.681 111.172 128.546
std. ft at standard conditions*
V Total HJD collected, ml, impingers 382.6 348.1 295.5
and silica gel
gas Volume of water vapor collected 18.14 16.50 14.01
ft^ at standard conditions*
% M % Moisture in the stack gas by 12.88 12.92 9.83
volume
M, Mole fraction of dry gas 0.871 0.871 0.902
% C02 13.0 19.2 20.8
7o °2 - 8.0 7.3 7.6
* 70°F, 29.92 in. Hg, dry basis
-------
TABLE A-I (Continued)
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN .NO.
% CO
MW, Molecular v?eight of dry
stack gas
MW
N
st
Molecular weight of wet
stack gas
Pitot tube coefficient
IL ^ Y<£ Average velocity head of
stack gas, in. HO
Average stack temperature, F
Net sampling points
Static pressure of stack,
in. Hg
Stack pressure in. Hg absolute
rss-1
27.0
52.0
30.40
28.80
0.85
0.546
119.
ft
83
0
29.62
USS-2
22.0 '
51.5
31.36
29.63
0.85
0.544
117.
76
0
29.54
USS-3
19.0
52.6
31.6
30.2
0.85
0.55
125.
85
0
29.3
Stack velocity at stack conditions 2639
fpm
2
Stack area, in.
4071
2589
4071
2632
4071
Dry stack gas volume at stand- 58,880
ard conditions-, SCFM
Stack gas volume at stack
condition ACFM
74,595
57,808
73,182
59,621
74,397
Percent isokinctic
106.3
106.7
106.1
* 70 F, 29.92 in. Hg, dry basis
-------
TABLE A-I (Concluded)
RUN NO.
Test Date
USS-1
11/16/71
USS-2
USS-3
11/17/71 11/18/71
.Tons steel procl.-:!;a"tt> .V.ts)
1330.95
1321.3
1298.5
m
an
Particulate -probe, cyclone and 15.7
filter in mg '*'•••''•
Particulate - total in mg 40.7
°L impinger catch 61.4
Particulate - i>robe, cyclone, 0.00197
and filter in gr/SCF*
64.0
104.6
38.8
0.00887
23.2
38.9
40.4
0.00278
ao
Particulate - total in gr/SCF* 0.00511
0.0145
0.00466
at
rarticulate - probe, cyclone, and
filter, gr/cf at stack conditions 0.00155
0.00700
0.00222
'au Particulate - total, gr/cf at 0.00403
. stack conditions
0.0114
0.00373
tf -
Particulate -probe, cyclone, and 0.00202
filter, Ib/ton steel produced
0.00827
0.00307
tt
Particulate - total, Ib/ton steel
produced
0.00524
Sulfate analysis S, as SO, mg 0.64
0.0135
1.64
0.00515
1.46
* 70 F, 29.92 in. Hg, dry basis
-------
2.
3.
TABLE A-II
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
UNITED STATES STEEL
USS-1
CONSTANTS
(a) • Barometric pressure (P^)
(b) Stack diameter (Ds)
(c) Sampling nozzle diameter (Dn)
(d) Stack gas pressure (Ps)
(e) Pitot tube coefficient (Cp)
OPERATIONAL DATA
(a) Volume of dry gas sampled, meter conditions
(b) Net time of Test (Tt)
(c) Volume of water collected (Vw)
(d) Particulates collected, front half (mf)
(e) Particulates collected, total (mt)
(f) Percent carbon dioxide (7oC02)
(g) Percent carbon monoxide (7<,CO)
(h) Percent oxygen (7.02)
(i) Average gas meter temperature (Tm)
(j) Average orifice pressure drop (Pm)
(k) Average stack gas temperature" (T8)
DERIVED DATA
(a) Percent nitrogen
7cN2 = 100 - (7oC02 + 7.02 + 7»CO) »
(b) Average pressure at the orifice
P
p = p, + m a
* n * D — —
° 13.6
(c) Area of the stack
All I' c
ta _ ' 1 o at
4 x 144
(d) Area of the nozzle
2
An, TT Dn M
29.62
72.000
,0.250
29.62
0.85
(Vra) 125.724
162.000
382.600
15.700
40.700
13.000
27.000
8.000
540.000
2.040 .
579.000 .
52.000
29 . 77
4072
'
0.049087
inHg
in
in
inHg
ft3
min
ml
mg
mg
7o
7o '
7.
°R
inH20
°R
7.
inHg
2
j
x 10"'
"4 2
4 x 144
-------
TABLE A- II
PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions: 70 F. , 29.92 in;
Hg, ft3
V = 17.7 x V (P, + P ) = 17.7 K-l?" "24 (29.62: +2.04) = 122.681 ft3
mstd m b T^fe _ 13.6 .
(T + 460) (80 + 460)
m
2. Volume of water vapor at 70°F and 29.92 in. Hg, ft
V = 0.0474 x V = 0.0474 x 382.6 = 18.14 ft3
w w
gas
3. Percent moisture in stack gas
0/M _ 100 xV, _ 100x18.14 _ ,, RR
AM = w - _ = iz.oo
gas - - -
— - - — 122.681 + 18.14
m ^ i w
std gas
4. Mole fraction of dry gas
M - < - " 12'88 = 0.871
d - -
100 " 100
5. Average molecular weight of dry stack gas
44 32 l~ 28 ~!
MW, - (7oC00 x HH ) + (%00 x \ ) + (7oCO + %N0) x
d . 2 "100 2 100 L 2 100 J
( 13.0 x ) + 8.0 x __ ) + (79.0 x = 30.40
100 100 100
6. Molecular v^eight of stack gas
MW = m^ x M_ + 18 (1 - M.) = 30.40 x .871 + 18 (1 - .871) = 28.80
d d Q
-------
TABLE A-II (Continued)
7. Stack velocity at stack conditions,- fpm
V = 4,360 x \Jpx (T + 460)
4,360 x 17.68
'•iP x MW
s
29.62 x 28.80
1/2
= 2639 fpm
1/2
8. Stack gas volume at s^ndar^ccrvditions, SCFM
Q = 0.123 x V x A x M x P = 0.123 x 2639 x 4071 x .871 x 29.62 = 58,880 SCFM*
S S Q Q S
(T + 460)
S
(119 + 460)
9. Stack gas volume at stack conditions, ACFM
.05645 x Q x (T + 460) .05645 x 58,880 x (119 + 460) , cnc
C- = xs s ' = ' = 74,595 ACFM
P x M
s
29.62 x 0.871
10. Percent isokinetic
1,032 x (T + 460) x V
= s m
std
V x T ' x P^ x M, x- (D )'
s t £ d n
1,032 x (119 + 460) x 122.681
2639 x 162 x 29.62 x .871 x (.25 )
11. Particulate: probe, cyclone and filter, gr/SCF*Dry Basis
C = 0.0154 x
an
m.
m
= 0.0154 x 15'7 = 0.00197 gr/SCF
122.681
std
12. Particulate total, gr/SCF* Dry Basis
m
C = 0.0154 x
ao
= 0'.'0154 ~k 40.7
122.681
0.00511 gr/SCF
m
std
* 70 F, 29.92 in. Hg
-------
TABLE A-II (Continued)
13. Particulate: probe, cyclone and filter, gr/CF 'at stack conditions
17.7 x C x P x M. 17.7 x .00197 x 29.62 x .871 A nn.ce .,
C = ansd= = 0.00155 gr/CF
3. t
(T + 460) (119 + 460)
s
14. Particulate: total, gr/CF at stack conditions (dry)
C = 17.7 x C . x P x M. = 17.7 x .00511 x 29.62 x .871 = 0.00403 gr/CF
au ao s d
(T + 460) (119 + 460)
S
15. Particulate: probe, cyclone, and filter, Ib/ton steel produced
Ptf « ^ X ^ X ^ - -^.7x58,880x162 . 0.00202 .Ib/ton
453,592 x V x TON ' 453,592 x 122.681 x 1330.95
m ,
std
16. Particulate: total, Ib/ton steel produced
mt x Q XT = 40.7x58,880x162 = 0.00524 Ib/ton
tt §—
453,592 x V x TON 453,592 x 122.681 x 1330.95
m . ,
std
-------
APPENDIX B
COMPLETE GASEOUS RESULTS WITH
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
(not applicable to U.S. Steel emission report)
-------
APPENDIX C
FIELD DATA
-------
Irst "0. J50P*..
l.ocation Q^_ S.Zj-L^-_ . J-p./?.#jtHJO
A. Dist. fron inc,iii? rf fiV v,;;11 i: o-j1.'. jj- -.•"
near wall, in.,«
Insido didrr.etor of stac'-: = A-H
Stack Area. =
Connents:
Sketch of st?.ck cross -section.
showing sr.nplinq holes
Calculations:
r fl.? p
U--.-r.v--.,
7
/V
*' r\ 4 n
circul^r stack
:??..
62. .S
78.o
of sarnie port, in. ;
-?.fi^ -4- V
z
/J
Z 7 0
-------
. VELOCITY Tr.Avr.usi: nn.o DATA
0.
, 4-o/e/?-yjJ <3///o
. --."I!-
Test
frt 1 OH £ter_' g: _/VT
X?
o . ®
>—<
: & .
Dote /yc>v)- hg. i-i ?/
fc"7 "•--" T "- - - - r "*
Operator
Meter AH
3 c.
P/f
Clock
Tiin"
/9C? .:•••"'
1
1
, 1
•
J
CD*P
P n "1 Ti 1~
_J . .
i.
•
5
S'
s
f^
7^
7
0
o
?
/o
/!
IT,
i '3
in. 1L
CD
Ap -T7C I] r.
£>* 31
, v?/
„ 37
y i
, ^- /
-?
^^ j^._
i
i
,^ n ^
- :.
1
i
f 5 -£"'/" ^ •' S
/r---'
/-^ /-::-
i
'Ay -O 1 ' •' -.
^ • 1 I n /•; 2
(2) 6P, in, !
Corr.ments:
HCAP-2S (12/oV)
-------
PARTICULAR ,:I£LD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL ll-l ALL BLANKS Ambient Temp °F
Rc-::d end rccori- at the start cf
Bsr. Prsss. "Ha
9.
n 'i "^ * * /^ i t*^/N^/^.'*t T*. f«^*"**F**r^/*' **•" '^ <~i ^*
P.-H ; riuLOo i C/;.L i : . o i ;\ £.RA i uRS-
rcsd and rcccrc every 5 minutes.
Assarr;3c Moisture v^ —
i « C v- I. L' •" ij w'.'» O *- v L ) » • 'J 9 r
ri'OOG I "i p via . > in. •
:,ci';r.r Box No. /-/- /
i
i
1
: PC-';!", ~-
i/3'U.v.
i
i
'
.
i
;
I
• i
i DRY r\S
C i ";.•*!' ' ? '(.""TV"* PI?
u . u u .v | ;•;£, li, -\ . Ur
"*~ •" • • i •, j
0~oLz&U^ ! 6 o<2, j ; ^5"
\
:
\
I O 1 .^ : .-'"'/9i <1 "7^x» -~'f- o
/rt ^". ^ : / O ! 6 ~ (", ••- / -_•?
]
j
i
i
' :
i
i
t
!
i
!
!
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
.
Orifice A!-.
' in H00
LJcS'i i";?C j P.Ct'ja !
0?,5 ! o-e>
i i.,9
! :•„-
?, .0 ) .-,../":•
1
i
'.
i
i
!
i
!
!
!
Dry Ges Te.r.p.
0;r
IT lrt ",' r-, •*- 1 /"• . . .u 1 ^ j.
in 1C t ! utw itf w
^,.^ I ,-' •"-
o - 1 r- r;
/O / i 7<0
t O .'•" i T .?!
i
i
i
1
i
!
i
i
1
i
;
i
PL.TO
w- '
In. Mg
/ -7. ''^
-------
FIl-Ll) MOISTURE DFTERHIIJATIOI1
Location ().£,. STE£/L-
"7~
Comments:
Test
Date /-t.V)/. /to, I'l
Operate r
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure 2.Q, 6. 2_
Clock
Tims
39V3: so
yo /3 : So
/0221, /O
Meter
(«3)
(eOO.'S/O
(0 2 8 . £ to
£,26 ,8/0
/J£r ^'6.5oo
Flow Mster
Setting (CFH)
Meter
Temperature, Tin
//U OuT"
.6>B & i~4.
2-/.3(#
(\'l) = v/aight of moisture collected =
100-W
. 3/
% Moisture by Volume =
'375-P^-V
Rl
* ^
% Moisture by Volume - j$!
By Wat and Dry Bulb Temperatures:
Wet Bull-, Temp. °F % Moisture- From Psychometric Chart
Dry Culb Tcr,ip.'_ °!:
. (J2/KY)
-------
Si'vl i ng location _____ Ji<3P ___ j5
STACK DATA FOR HOMOGRAPH:
1. Meter AH _____ . ;,;^3 ___ 1n H20
2. Avg. meter tempt (ambient * 20
3. Moisture (volume) _ ._ ____ )Q,L><-/ __ %
4. Avg. static press. * _,„. Q, / \ in. H2CX.073 - +
5, Bar. press sainpling point __ g<^f.^^ in.licj j; „ 007 ( static pr&ss in. Ho) =
6. Bcir press of meter ^-^g, ^,, ^ in. llg.
7 p /p = 5« ^-°- •"> '- in- ''9
0, Avg, stack temperature / .^;?- °F. ".
9. Avg. stack velocity (AP) a. -^^ in HgO. MAX. VELOCITY
• C factor (1) : /.OO (2)
10. Probe Tip size ,p..ic.:D_ ; :
-------
PART1CULATE FIELD DATA
No.
Meter Box No.
'"?> A/ of
--rotor ..
TTC
Temp. °F_£>_
Bar Press, In. Hg _2J2
Probe Tip Dia. , In. —
Probe Length S" f ^
Box No. "2-0.
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, <
Probe Heater Setting »•?
Pitot Tube Correction Factor (L.
Motor AH L
rr .
oint
/
2.
3
4
5
A
7
r
Clock
Time
JID?M$
II 10
1 l/^
II IH
me
ni%
iizo
//a a
Dry GGG
Metcr,CF
bXl.tbb
&Wi35
MV.6I5
mO.c&Q
(sHmw
WWoo
(>h 'B^/oo
6V^,c/5-D
Pitot In.
H20 AP
O'tff
0-^
0-H(*
O'SO
o>$^
o.Bb
o-*>?
O.LJ
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
I./D
(>^&
A 75
I'lO
/'95
2. b5
Z.I-C
Z.-bb
Actual
/. /^>
/^O
/-75
l-°b
•2 . 00
3-3-0
^'35
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
L<-l
C*S
^
^
^
^7
4^
Pump
Vacuum In.
1-5 Q GGUCJO
3-5
3,0
V-o
S-D
E>'6>
C»D
L'5
%.o
Box
Temp. °F
3-50
26,5
^76
ImpinQor
Tamp °F
h
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
/£>£>
I/S
/3£>
/3/
/^
1^9-
i^Sr
/3-f
mrncnts :
(. 1/^-L 6-UU J
,
C-
Sheet
Of _13r_
-------
PART1CULATE FIELD DATA
un No.
ocation
ate
perator
ample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Lenath
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
9
10
n
/^
/3
/4
Clock
Time
uW
H7-L
//1U"
ll^o
m^
DIH
u3H:j$-
Dry Gas
Motcr.CF
m. 450
£,6^ '75
6-8^-350
6-7,3. 775
^55.9-^5
C57-B^
- e/i/o ^
Pitot In.
H20 AP
0. 7P
^.*73L-
<9 '^^
0
-2.-ZO
3-rfp£-t/s
Dry Gas Tcrnp. °F
Inlet
76
97
/DO
/£ 1
/DO
G- (£>&.
Outlet
£><*-
(,CI
70
11
72,
7-^5)
Pump
Vacuum In
!-Jg Gauge
S--5
9/0
"7-5
n.o
(,.5
Dox
Temp. °F
i
Impinocr
Temp °F
9 •
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
//^
//D
J/O
/IO
HO
JOO
ornrnents :
Shoot _.?-_
Of
-------
PART1CULATE FIELD DATA
un No.
ocation
ate __
CCS 3-/
porator
G rn p I G Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
/6
(5
/H
/I
/-a
//
10
Clock
Time
•
//W.V3
I WC. Hb
HHt'.H5
IISO'VS
1153.^5
H^-^b
llb^'^5
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
t57,7?S
£57, 0CIC
££W
0.55
O'&O
0.{&
o^5
£•13
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
r SEC
(-GO
{-bo
1,0$
a- 3-5
2^0
2>^C>
3L-&
Actual
lO^D
/-La
l.*o
•^>05
a^5
a.yo
^-VD
n.^5
Dry G(is Temp. °F
Inlel
HE/9-r
7^
7£"
s-i
^5
^
c/o
cjH
Outlet
i/^/t//3
•70
7/
7/
72.
7^
?a.
7 a
Purnp
Vacuum In.
Mg Gauge
HA/&-
H.L>
^.o
5-0
£.0
l.o
7-0
9-5
Box
Temp. °F
2-OO
Irnpingcr
Tcrnp °F
-------
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
•? u n N o.
-ocation
)ntP
Operator
3 ample
Point
Cj
9
7
(o
5
I
f~\
L\
CLSS-;
Rox No
Clock
Time
//5L- >/5
use: ^5
j 'T-oo'.tiB
fj^c'3- ',$
id-D1-/'.^
w.v
1 3- Otr '.1$
w.v
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
.W-945
67ft7ao
673- W3
C'ly.l^D
/ '"T C /<• 0 7""1
(3 / J'O ff~<~J
miw
M.-ne
679.V7C
Pitot In.
H20 AP
0.-70
^-* * C^'^7*
L^- * Co ^
^,40
£>.50
tf-va
0^/<2
sr6Y-
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp.
Bar Press, In.
Assumed Moist
Heater Box Se
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
*.(,£>
'^•30
WO
a. as
I-*B
y-5?
/ .so
? ra
Actual
a. 70
3.-'3<9
^•W
JL. 25
/ft?
/.^o
/-50
r~~T~~
OF
Hn
urnnth
eater S
be Corre
\H
fn
Gtt i ng
ction Fa
r.tor
Impingor
Tornp °F
/ — s\ "i
Stack
Press
In. Hg
StacSx
Temp. °F
/^3
/?-5
iv-s
10^
I/O
/oH
ID1
Comments :
a N ^ A f
W I I w W I ^
Of
-------
PART1CULATE FIELD DATA
u n No.
opotion
)Qte
CLS S - I
operator
sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
/
2.
3
H
5
£
7
Clock
Time
•
/3-W
/•3-S/
/>53
73-55
7*57
7-3- 57
/30/
Dry GGG
Mctcr.CF
STfiR
04.7%?
'**o. %2>Q
6W.675
tel'IVo
&H' %70
^6.33-5
Ml. 330
Pitot In.
H20 AP
r rM
0-33
o.^n
(?>iz
2-S5
O.S5
0 ' £f
^•O
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
IRD h
1.^
I.HD
(.(,0
1 - OS
a-<35
2- 15
a. 35
Actual
t£47~
1-2,0
/..VO
1-1,0
3.05
3 -05
-3.-P.S
3.35
Dry Gas Tomp. °F
Inlet
S/f-^/o
^b
4?
•70
7V
7f
$-.
lo
Pump
Vacuum In
!-!g Gauge
5-O
3-D
3-5
5.0
^.^>
y.o
J-S
Bos
Temp. °F
2-f/
Irnpingcr
Tomp °F
»
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
/oc>
1^0
l^H
/^
faS
/^l.
/£&
/ornrncnts :
Shoot-S
Of __/_4,
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
un No.
opotion
ate
U5S-/
pcrator
amplo Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
i
Heater Box Settling. °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
t
9
10
II
/a
/3
m
H
Clock
Time
/3o3
/35
/•3/6
Dry Gcs
MetcfeCF
'5
&W600
69/.330
&92.9££
69V-5&
Ml, .110
tfl.&D
LW.WC
ICO.L-IQ
Pitot In.
H20 AP
o>n
o.(>$
C-5£>
0- £3.
(9.&0
0-Vc?
o. ^5
57"6.
Orifice AH In. H^O
Desired
2 60
Q..5C
2-05
/.c/s
/.c/0
1-5?
'/. "ID
0 7-£_<
Actual
^•^
5. -So
a -£>s
3-<39
/•9£)
/'55
y.^o
^r —
Cry G(is Temp. °F
Inlet
ZC,
w
9o
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
un No.
opotion
ate
LLSS- \
pcrator
ample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
/£,
1C,
IS
/¥
/3
/a
//
1C
Clock
Time
/33C
mo
/33a
/33V
/-336
m?
/3VO
/3V^
Dry GGS
Meter, CF
*7£'0'Y03
Id.
^>. V<9
av5
6^35
(9*53
^,53
0-S^
Orifice AH In. H20
DcGired
A/5
/•'5
/•5^
1-^0
1-6-5
Z . CD
^•00
1-GS
Actual
/./5
/./s
ASO
/.7(9
/.
^.O
^^
Box
Temp. °F
1&
Irnpinoor
Tomp °F
t
Stack
Press
In. i'ig
Stack
Temp. °F
/IB
1-9-5
/T-5
/y-5
175
/?5
^/
:omrncnts :
ShoGt.__7_ Of „./.?'•.
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
{u n No.
.ocation
)ats
it s s -
)perator
Cample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
9
fr
7
£
5
V
3
n
3
Clock
Time
/^W
n%
i-bv$
robo
W52.
I'bSf
'^5^
/357;/5
Dry Gas
Motcr.CF
7/61- ^5
"7 /A &ZO
Irt.Soc
'7/5-^30
'"i/^.yso
llt'^C
IZO'/IG
13). OU'
Pitot In.
H20 AP
0^^
o-^U •
^•ts
0,^,0
^'&5
o-'-n
O-W
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
a -6^
a-65
•^>/o
2-25
2.05
/05
AS-O
sro/
Actual
3. CO
a^o
7-^b
•>.J5
-?.t?s
7-50
/.g-o
^ T/
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
cn
9-i-
9^
96
9^'
9S'
9g-
c.S 7"-
Outlet
73
7V
*7V
'7S
75
75
7£ .
— £
Pump
Vacuum In
!-!g Gauge
^-5
•7-5
9-O
5-- 5
7,5
/-5
5,5
/VD (
Cor.
Tern p. °F
%5
)F F<
Impingcr
Tornp °F
%
^/?7
Stack
Press
In. Hg
-/y ^
Stack
Temp. °F
1^1
I;B
iii
ifr
IDS
101
/cS
FA-/—
1— /I /
'.ommcnts :
Sheet
Of _.i^__
-------
PARTICULAT
E
FIELD DATA
:un No.
opation
)porator
i a in p I e Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Hooter Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe "Heater Sotting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
R£.c
/
a
3
V
5
L
/— >
Clock
Time
\TfiRl
r
£
•^
ris
!l
2
£
K-
">
\A
^
Ul
Dry|Gcs
Motv^.CF
- r/:
n^i.o^o
m-BeC
733- S-75
T-Sc
Dry Gas Tcrnp. °F
Inlet
'£" T
'?<«-
•?&-
g-0
f
I'd- 5
/3-y
Comments :
Shoct.___9. Of _J^-:
-------
PARTICULATE . FIE
DATA
un No.
ocction
IIS S -
operator
Cample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling. °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
£
°l
)Q
11
A
/^
Yb
Clock
Time
•
Dry Gas
Motcr.CF
TV*. £50
Tb!>-teC
71?$. 53B
/}O
I/O
lornrncnis :
Sheet ...Jj? Of
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
-?un No.
-ocotion
)ate
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe -Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
tf- IV
Point
/Hi-
1
X
3
H
5
(,
7
Clock
Time
V, fd
Dry: Gas
MotOr.CF
~ST/1R
7VO. 950
7^-36C
7V'3-S?£
'7W- &-'2>&
o-w
o-bi
0.51
0-ioO
O.(,0
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
sr ~
l./D
/35
/•S'O
A95
/•95
3t.>2
2-#>
Actual
sixrl-
I./D
/•35
l-<#0
Lib
A 95
^^c)
3-^-0
Dry Gas Td'hip. °F
Inlst
1 /7£/»
77
fO
•S-P,
s-v
S-7
g-f
?/
Outlet
r - f
15
75
w
75
75
75 .
75
Pump
Vacuum In.
!-!cj Gauge
•/}-sr
H.S
y.o
$.5
t'O
(,.D
^•D
f.O
Bos
Tcmp..°F
$Trt-cK
H£.4i
r^p
Q-^0
Irnpihccr
Ten-.. °F
~ A
~ A/o-/fy^
\5U
Stack
Press
In. HQ
?/l7~ 2
K//4
Stack
Ternp. °F
•>
s
//3
I3D
/2>O
/30
/3-5
IIS
id~b
Comments
//
Of
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
R u n No.
Location
Date
less-/
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Seitlinc. °F
Probe Tip Did. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AM
Point
?
C7
1C
n
ii'
/3
^
/V
Clock
Time
Dry Gas
Meter, C!r
n$h/T>0
•'7 S3. foe
75V. 53^
7 Si -V &0
ISS-HOQ
ILO-VlO
I&'QIC
n&.zz'c
Pitot In.
H20 AP
£-4,3
()•&•
c-to
oni
ono
O-IO^D
o-^o
EA>'0
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
a. 3 5
2 -35
3-95
p. °IO
^40
•^^
.2- 3D
OF T
Actual
^•35
1 35
2.%
a -90
a, 40
1-35
^•^c>
'EST
Dry 3as Temp. °F
Inlet
93
95
97
700
/o"l
/??>
/G^
^^
Outlet
7V
7^3
"75
74
76
76
11 .
6 - /
Pump
Vacuum In
!-!rj Gauge
C!-O
f-5
10^
/y>o
n.o
-------
Date
PARTICULATF, CLEANUP SilF.F/f
71 AW !(' Plant: U.S
un Number
Operator :
Sample box number:
, L OR fiT.fr 0
Location of sample port; fc «ft" .Stt c /v' >3(0
Barometric pressure ; 3. ^* Q^L,
Ambient temperature; -^
Tmpingcr H20
Volume after sampling
Volume collected
m 1
Impinger prefilled with
ml
Impingers and bac"k half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No.
Extra No.
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No. U <•>$'- 1-
Extra Ho . U S$ - / -
Filter number
\ t
Filter P^pcrc and Dry Filter p^ri-i <~nlal-.e
Container number Filter number
Container number
Silica Gel
P^
Weight after test:
Weight before test: G-rc^
Moisture weight collected:
Container number:
- '7
4.
S ///
37, ^
3 w fT- o
Moisture
total
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments : C >Tk'' H
/,/ .SS "_/ - /
~\
/ 9
Analyse for:
+*- d
.5<-Vv.-r
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Ti me
Operator ./,,./'-,,
^*>~™- a,~Tr |^-
Comments;
Test
$££*
r •{';••/ "J".
jf/yTip ^^ ^"^ P
. o?/
/
(%) ..,.
•- Reading 1 -
"*7-o,c,%
1 3 , &~
(o2)
Reading 2
2.1. f
8.0 !
. ?. // <2 _
(CO)
Reading 3
^>5O,o
i7.o|
- -4^V^
NCAP-31 (12/07)
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
3 u n N o
Lcpation
n n-t ^
Operator
Sample
Point
,,n-ja
a
-5
.H
.5
4
7
g
(,/S.S - 3-
(./ , s. s-f P t ,A WMW, CT «s, , vv
7 ; /t'0 (/ / ^
Cox Nc
i- /• or
, /f-/.^~"3x
/
>
Clock
Time
IblO
IC11
/OIH-
IbHo
IDt*
ID1D
10^-
/ciH
Dry Gas
Moter.CF
7«.>43
^^30
W.^t
7M.4SO
ru. 0,0
792. V/0
>76/3.<&-3c
7
Pitot In.
H20 AP
o.^o
o.w
o.-bs
0.^15
o-BD
0.53
0.5*7
0.W
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp.
Bar Press, In.
Assumed Moisl
Heater Box Sc
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
0.76
t.OB
l-2>o
1.70
I.*B
/. 75
a./o
2.00
Actual
C'.IL
I.O5
/.3o
/70
/••rB
1.15
/V"" / y
* 0 ^*"
7,70
,y-/
°F .5'^
f\ (~« r L-i
H n / L/ ' b /
iirH
( ^
^
iH
W
(,S
Pump
Vacuum In
!-!g Gauge
v? '_!?
0 • ^5
i-5
/C>.£
II.D
11 £>
110
115
Probe T
Probe L
Probe H
Pitot Tu
Meter i
Box
Temp. °F
P Dia. ,
_ongth
cater S
be Corrc
\H /.
in ^/
5rf/-
^tti nQ
cfion Fa
rtnr <^'/i?C
Irnpingor
Tornp °F
*
Stack
Press
In. HO
Stack
Temp. °F
/o5
//5
13-3
/IS
us
m
/a7
17-H
)ornrnents :
Of _/_?-
-------
PARTICULATE
IELD DATA
Run N o.
Location
Date
Operator
S G m p I G Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, in. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
9
/C
//
n
/3'
;3
Clock
Time
/G'O-6
/ o?-S-
I0~b0
/O'J}^
/0'W
/c-^5 ;07
Dry Gas
Motor.Cr
lU'OJU
I^/OC
79?.frV£
• 7^
(7 '^c/
o-^ci
o-so
STOP
Orifice AH In. H20
Dcaircd
a- 55
0-55
a. 5^
a- 6
AJ5
TEST"-—
Actual
/^5^
a.a^
a-V5
2.. .50
7'5^>
— EA/n
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Iniet
$7
<1 a
95
99
/(ft
Ci> F
Outlet
£6
££-
^^
6?
V£
i/?sr ^
Pump
Vacuum In
!-!g Gauge
ag - ^
•i / -5
cr- / •->
11-Q
/?.G
ft.D
E/?7~
Box
Tern p. °F
-
lb$
2-45
//-7>3V;-9
hr.pi n oar
Tomp "°F
Stack
Press
in. Hg
Stack
Tern p. °F
/3-y
//6
//^
//O
/<£>
Comments :
Shoot _f~.
Of
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
u n No.
ocation
)ate
operator
".ample
Point
1 r v— •—•
It,
IS
IH
/3
/a
//
/Q
(A/S.S ~ c.
Rnx No
Clock
Time
-AKT
/S-ii : 26
/a/3: 25
,a/5-.35
,an.-35
/ifl.'SS
;aa;..33
/ 2-13/35
:.•*•'•
Dry.. Gao
Mctcr.CF
7EST
'trey. 511
o' 0 u . Q- QQ
O f^"! ^ ^ r
^.JW
v>.w
s-a.w
f^.5^
Pitot In.
M20 AP
^/ss-a
C-V7
6rsr
7.^5
OF
Hn
tiro, %
ttlino, °
F
'•A,
Dry Gas To Hip. °F
Inlet
rr, FA,
^
u.
71).
"76
r
^-/
6V
65
^5
^5 .
^S
Pump
Vacuum In
Hg Gauge
'•<•/<,
/0.5
/d?,5
/o.B
/3L-0
/5-O
75,0
/^.O
Probe T
Probe L
Probe -H
Pitot Tu
Motor /
i ''*'
box
Tomp.*°F
Pcnr '
a?a
ip Dia. ,
^ongth
eater S
be Corre
!\H
In
ot ti ng ,
ction Fa
r.tnr
5'
r ' '
Irnpis'.ccr
Tcm.;;"°F
^
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
I/O
119
/*B
/3-5
Itt
' &^ u
I Cs (J
:omrncn'rs :
Shoot
Of J.?-
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No. IIS.S-2-
Location
Date
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box Wo.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
7
Q-
ij
7
.6
5'
V
H
Clock
Time
/ 3 3-5 '.35
/3-a"7:;>5
A-3-T.35
/23r.-}5
/^3'V3I.
/ 2 35 :35
7236 '.35
Dry Gas
Mctcr.CF
ZIL.'bSb
^}
ZM.%10
$-3-5.5Sfr
Pitot In.
H20 AP
^O5
O'loO.
0-(&
o-sz
c.%
0-^
^rcP
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
a. 73
730
a as
a.;3
/.7S
/^^
rF^r -
Actual
^.^
SL.^
2^.5
a-A5
/'75
?.io
- 6/i/O
Dry Oas Temp. °F
lnl.it
C75
•?«-
/DO
10'^
ICLj
icv
OF c,
Outlet
67
4?
^
6?
7/
-7SL
r f1^;///:
Pump
Vacuum in
l!g Gaurje
/ £-.£
/O- 5
//. B
//.£
?.^
7.£>
HE/-
Temp. °F
!r
Irnpingor
Temp °F
h
./^X33V3^
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
70 ^
/
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No.
Location
Date
U S5-2,
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. .
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
i
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probo Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe- Hector Sotting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
Glc/-
•7. 7.5,?" #2
/
O
f^~ — .
3
V
.5
L
1
Clock
Time
RE ST
;2Vfr:30
/3-so:T,o
/3.52.f30
/25v:3z>
/as (,.-30
l^'.-bO
/3oc:3£>
Dry Gas
Meter.CF
'ART
S-3- -5^'
W-S-^
frlttiS
W.nb
^O.tf?
W-W
^33.C/V
Pitot In.
H20 AP
7"Esr
^P. 36Y
6^- 33
(9-^/5
^-5^-
£.£b
0'5S-
o.^/
Orifice AH In. HgO
Dcaircd
&ysi
/JO
I'^b
l.£l
I-W
2.^5
^•/3
^-^0
Actual
>-Q.;
A/o
A as
/.70
/.90
a-ftS"
a .'5
a -ao
Dry Gas Ternp. °F
Inlst
THii'i D
ryD
\
Stack
Press
In. Hg
PORT
Stack
Temp. °F
-h~ •-")
/DC
I/&
1^0
no
'!>D
/9-r
;^5
Comments
hoot.:
Of _'_!_
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run N o.
Location
Date
tCS
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg ______
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
r 01 nt
N?
sy
10
II
!-~L
J'3
0
Clock
Time
*» .-
/'3 C ~ . J ^
''•^'-^'
/sow
;3tf-Vf
l3/u'-3C-
>mu
i "^ ' ""* ' ~~* (~>
Dry Gas
Motcr.CF
v-^S2.
^7-3-5
b'31ci
W.K
m-?4
•^IMI
r,.^
H In. H20
Actual
• i y">
.i , H C'
«l .. U- ^
.2.^'
,Z.O^
a.as-
.5,00
- EH .1-
Dry Gas
Inlet
/ o 0
i o>
/ o 5"
/ 6) 6
no
in
-------
PARTJCULATE FIELD DATA
Run Mo.
Lopation
Date
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg —
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Lenoth
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
—
/
,7_
•—>
o
4-'
s"
C
7
Clock
Tims
/"> i. ,.~
l\-l';\Cr f\
/317 :*c
i3W'*£
133I'*C
1333 W
I3'&."M
1357' *G
)S3y;'-U'
Dry Gcs
f.lctcr.CF
r^r
#We\tf2-
&l£, &£
&(73?C
-tf«/7. »a
^S'0.9S-
$'«,£/
S'^/Ji
Pitot In.
H20 AP
^ US
0.33
0. tfX
o^o
(?.£?'
0,c~::±
C.is-
c. & %
Orifics AH In. H20
Dcsirod
^'^
(-•I 5
/ .5*.r
A S' 3
q./#
^.^r
.?. 3-3'
a , &>
Actual
t~C^
^^ .
t^^
Pump
Vacuum In.
!-!g Gauge
' Rcr-
7, $""
7.-O
-------
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
? u n No.
-cpotion
)ate
US5-2.
Dperotor
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe -Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH .,
Point
#
j
7
10
11
/3_
13
i^.
\
Clock
Time
/ 'sm '.zc
I31&M
l3Uv.'-'*£
;3 . ol
fating
yt&it,')
Pitot In.
H20 AP
C'-7I
fr ^
o. S7
tf.tfS
o.ti'5
0,^
St of
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
-, /. n
,< . t L-
z.z-c
-3L.IC
/.-7,r
/^^
/,5"S~
7^-.i;r -
Actual
2. LC
a,. ^0
a-/^
/,7-S""
i.tc
i.s-sr
/r>i X1 //
Dry (5as Temp. °F
lnl-3t
/ c- y
//*
y/^
//3
//3
//•~_
~ /^vHk
Outlet
^ c>
Sy^
^/
^:^
?3
^u/
//Crtt
Pump
Vacuum In
r!g Gauge
/6. c>
/7. 0
IL 0
^r*
y-c)
7. 6'
/V 153*
Box
Temp. °F
3t/
IrnpinQcr
Tornp °F
i
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Ternp. °F
>V>
/:*./
10
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
tin No.
ocation
Qt'G __
5 -
pcrator
ample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling. °F
Probe Tip Did. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
/6
/5~
H
13
;x.
//
10
Clock
Time
1 \\cc-: co
1 H C (f
J^C^I
hloC-
UlC-3
I'AtC
M/2.
iU/^|
Dry Gaa
Motcr.Cr
Ac.sT-o'
t&f.'m
$mb
Ztf-t'l
W.til
tf/.z-j
$7.1^1
^7H.'^
Pitot In.
H20 AP
r r<, '.>r
tf.oC'''
c?-3.X
c'^H/
-------
P ARTICULATE FIELD- DATA
un No. LL.55-2-
opation
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling,
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe -Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
O <-* i r>$
1 01 Hi
'I
<7
7
,
^
/c'7
/
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
.Tun Mo.
i.opaticn
Date
- 2-
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
r 0! m
—
/
«•>*-
-->
O
'/
s
k
7
Clock
Time
/?._.v/v,-rt
Mi.f3'
/ >l W S"
A/ w 7
H 49
1*151
/'AS 3
/V-S.5
Dry Gas
Uotcr.CF
r^r
3 $•$'>?£
MA<^\
£?eu. ;v
f'A'7.(pC>
IZZJZ-&
\. • ^ ' • • "^
6't5 7. x.3
ec/o,i^
BIL, VA-
Pitot In.
H20 AP
*' ass-
i','^0
0. UZ.
6.SC
o.^s
^, 60
^ 60
£U^5
Orifice A
Desired
-*_
;
1,10
/,SV
A tjs
2-Gt.
2, 2-C
2/2-0
2.. .38
H In. M20
Actual
^:-sf
l,/0
/,s~s~
Ass
a, ob
Z-2-0
2. £.6
2-Vfc
Dry Gas
Inlet
/3.Y-'
f'(^
2'>T
c) f
9S
?-e
lot
/t>7
Temp. °F
Outlet
S^i. c A"
^:^
S'X
6-2-
Rl
83
^ '
P^
Pump
V UuUUiil III
Hg Gauge
- — > -/—
/V/-r
7. ^->
7 . 0
e.s
c//s
// D
/2/6
yv,^
Box
Temp. °F
/i/
Irnpinfjor
Temp °F
5-y/A
»
Stack
1 I 'J O O
In. HQ
y-A-,,--/-
Stack
Temp. °F
// 0
/3_ 0
/it
A^
/2LS
'2-Y
jtb
/ornments :
_ Of _
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
7un No. 6CSS-
.ocation
Operator
"ample- Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. h'g
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling. °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
r\
w
ri
fo
il
/L
I -L
Clock
Time
J ^7
t is q
/c5o/
/ 5 ea
/SO 5
i £>£.(,
SSZy-
/VJ>,,/JV
Dry Gas
Mc-tcr.CF
P9V./7
e%,c<>
& 63
r/0/, 575
/V£7~
1/5. j/ a/
Pitot In.
H20 AP
o.ii.
b,l#Cs
O,S o
O- V.5
O.Hi
Bfi
Orifice AH In. H20
Dc-cired
2L/60
2-- ?-6
Affs
/. <*5
),<*s
>p o^
/•J*=tsi=-
Actual
Z/6-o
Z-2-6
/'fiS
/y C-.fi
/fcjT
T^T"
/f.t/c-
/•$&
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inl.jt
/c«.
ycB
//o
//o
//o
CL-S5 ~
/}•„
Outlet
PV
Sv
ev
Box
Temp. °F
• •• i. -
/I/ 3^
Irnpingcr
Temp °F
;.
t
CA7^
Stack
Press
In. Kg
Stack
Temp. °F
'2-Y
/;&
/*7
/&£
/dy
:ornmcnts :
Sheet _
Of _ZjrL-
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP
|>atc
?/
un
Number (-/ .S S ~ -
Operator: rf re ;M£.L.y fpc } re
|jample box number:
Plant ; U.S. <>T<~-ZL , L c,-S~
Extra No. £•{<,$—a.-f=
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No. U 55 ~Z-<
Extra No.
55-a. ~
Filter number
^ J- "
a. .-x —
f /o-O.'S' -
^ -L /f
/ c-a.7-
nrv Filter Particulate
Container number Filter number
a
- /{,
Container number
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
VIoight before test: ^'-os^
Moisture weight collected
Container number:
^ c
3- f ff- -
3 t:> / . 7 3. ^ / . O
1.
2.
3.
4.
s;/
Moisture
total 3'/
Sample number:
Method determination:
Analyze for:
Comments:
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location c.t, .5-. ,.c •„-•/-,.-
Date ->/ .;.-.•
Time
Comments
Operator
/ 7
Test
-)'l ijC' i' I 7
<^< i" i - Z-
•£-'/->/;•? s/is-i^i. /•:
?/ ,VJ if > 7
as's-z-
^'^'.'.'t'\' -v • '(" O-'/'^v/.-Vj^.
'
,
(co2) ..,.
-- Reading 1 -
3 I*O
i <~J "•>
(o2)
Reading 2
3 ^-,. S'
~*+ _* - . >"
••">• '-.'^ --.» '
(CO)
Reading 3
> .0 -0
'_ •+ -< _rr
NCAP-31 (12/07)
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Q ;V-\ ;.. o..? /-•) / '
Comments:
Date /VOV /'f/, , .:; •-/ f
; / . _ ... ' ' '
Time ~'< /:vn. PH^i '7-.—
Operator /v\rr,'
.-
Test
^^;
d-&—
-
(co2) ....
•- Reading 1 -
/*. V
;7'-=-
(o2)
Reading 2
Z. J ^
^c,, „.
(CO)
Reading 3
> .S o
2.1/0 {
. _vH. /•;
NCAP-31. (12/07)
-------
P ARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No.
Location ^>?---'
Date /6 /i;
7;
Meter Box No. tf~
Ambient Temp. °F 7S7
/GO)
/O 0^.1
/oos
Dry Gas
Motcr.CF
'//'/. ^'f?
9A,/y
9/7,^y
9/G.^3
9Z 0. o/
92Avy
^az/^g
92-y. ^2-
Pitot In.
H20 AP
AJU
<9,JJI
C'Vl
^•V5
o.s,y
t>.£(f
O,k/
G.bS
Orifice AH In. H20
Dcsirod
K3s
/-2-3
A S3
A 7<5
^•06
Z/oB
2.ZS
Z< St>
Actual
/.Js
J.LS
/5s
J.70
ZiOO
^//c
2,25
Z,S 0
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
6/
£
//-S
/^-«S
2-0,^;
Cox
Temp. °F
'2,8*-
C?S
-------
PARTICULATE FIEL
DATA
Run No.
Location
Date
-3
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Motor AH
Point
7
Jo//
/*A-3
yo/s
/o>7
JC/,77
0, 70
0.t>
2, JO
Z^^>
2.f»G
cT^ ^
Actual
^..SD
z. 70
2->S6
Z-^5
Z, 30
2^D
2, JO
^i.^r
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
9-5
(/V
^6
9<7
/0.3
/&&
/ Cls>
y^£
Outlet
66
67
^e.
6 7
7/
7^
75
Pump
Vacuum In.
!-!g Gaurje
^/r 0
2,0 .-£
ZO.^
2£>.£>
)3,&
/S.&
//.^>
Box
Temp. °F
/i' 3 3
Irnpinncr
Tornp °F
k
M&
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
/Jo
/Jo
/A3
/&6>
S/0
;o7
/° 7
Comments :
loot 2-..,... Of __/!/„..
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No. /X53 —-
Lopofion
Date
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Ho
Assumed Moisture, %
Neater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
!~/j-j;~- z/,
t\,-r 2-
//<
\S
'Y
13
/Z.
//
10
c37
/W
/t'i/
Dry GGG
Meter, CF
9.37. 75S
9 31. it?
340, 76
C^/ •//
9, <-/ &
&.*&
6>. 6xS'
&. to 7
$.73
£>/76
0,lf
ASz.
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
/. 7t3
Z-o3
2.36
Z-4^
2-/6Q
2. go
2. 80
3. co
Actual
/, e>o
2.<&£
Z/Vo
Z'HS
2, "76
2.^0
'2, to
J- SjS
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
7o
9y
96
/06
/^> y
/^7
/t>7
se$
Outlet
73
?y
75
7^
7<»
7&
78
/'/
Purnp
Vacuum In.
Hg Gauge
/£>,£ '.
/6/O
/Vx6
/£/ o
Irnpingor
Temp °F
. •
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °f
//2_
/i6
/Jo
/Zc7
>Zf
/^f
A2.7
/^^
Comments
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No.
Lopotion
Dote
Operator
Sample Box Nr-.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °fr
Bar Press, In. H<]
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Miter £H
Point
8
7
(*
.5/
t(
~i
j>
o
Clock
Tirnc
/W3
}t>^
/cm
/ 0 11 <1
IC^{
i c-53
/6?~>:/G
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
c/s/- tJ
f/s:?,2-y
VSS.Clc,
3
rt^'i.^C
Pitot In.
H20 AP
£>. 6,5
0. <*£•
v.ss
p. ti I'l
0- ^ ^
^?, *s 6
<;?d'^
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
~> ?O
<-«o b
2r,j e
Z-c-J
/^:^
ATS" .
7"t:iT'-
Actual
Z.« Vo
2"/0
e.-oj;
/, 6- S"
i. do
£>•* cC c?"/
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
//o
///
//.J
//s-
//(./
Outlet
60
B/
8/
^^
$1-
/•/^i-
Purnp
Vacuum In.
;-!g Gauge
/6', &
/£"
^aw/ylf-
Box
Temp. °F
>
^ /t> 5
Irnpinccr
Temp °F
3t/t/7
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stock
Temp. °
/Z?
//£
/£&
I Cc/
/ ^ j
* /* >
Comments
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No.
LopQtion
Dote
ICS S -.
Opcrotor
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moictur-3, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probo Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
/
^
„_•>
i,\
S""**
G
~->
Clock
Time
//37
// S7
y/3?
//'.;/
//t/3
// .^>
/. u O
/.s'o
j,? .5 ^~
:^ , u o
'.2 , !5 d>
Dry Gas Ternp. °F
Inlet
U,'c--7
.'/ '••,
.5 t/
^5-
tr7
7 $-
/j^
Outlet
^f'^ k
7 £~
7 C
77
77
77
7 ?
?<£'
Pump
Vacuum In.
Hg GQUQO
^-/•7
7. o
£-' - S"
<* -^
o - <••
/^., <3"
/^ o
1^.0
) i-L O
Box
Temp. °F
r/V?
7*.'?0
-Z 7 &
Impingor
Temp °F
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °f
/.^
/£•*
/^:^
'ICO
/t o
/^V-*
/^6>
Comments :
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No.
Lopation
bate
Meter Box No. _..
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Probe Tip Did. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Sample
rOI rti
?'
7
1C
if
/a.
/3
id
/M
Comment
Box No
Clock
Time
//5V
//«-3
//.«-
//^"7
;/s-y
/ 2. Cf
/3-"»
7^. >7
w*
<7-?^r(
iw.™
Fito' In.
H20 AP
^..^
^s-o
^..i/rr
<•* 7
10 £
i b £
io(.
- YA;,
F
Temp. °F
Outlet
>i'
40
11
31
**.
ITS
S'3
V
Pump
VQCUUsTl ID.
Mg Gauge
//. s-
7.. 5"
^.r
^. ^
i", -j>-
s--r
--Sc-o,y;
Meter /
Box
Temp. °F
uJt
^H
Impingor
Temp °F
.
L 3-SMS
Stack
r fCSS
In. Hg
Y
^,
!
Stac!; '
Temp. °F,
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run No. [CS 2 -
Location
Date
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. He: _
Assumed Moisiture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AM •
Point
/
i
^
X.
/
->
<-~^.
3
Clock
Time
/.:> 3O
te. ~^>O
/i'SX
/2/.?3::?r-
A^S-
/2l/<7
/.* r/
/AfT3
Dry Gas
f.iGtcr,Ci:
£c.£V*-ff
-7£t;v>sT
7^.0'f
9 £X/ 6
^ £ » • "f"
7sr3,/#
c/^//,5Y
v^r.?^
Pitot In.
H20 AP
T^.<;t
A. t/S"
e-Liy
^fci°
-*$1- *
e. a 3
6\ -/ ^
^.S"c5
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
Ket*
J, "70
1. $ 0
Te 6~
i I c.P
I..ZO
, £,*/•
I'tsr
1 , 5~C
J
-------
PARTICULATE . FIELD DATA
Run N o.
Lopction
Date
/CSS--3
Operator
S a m p I c Box N o.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Hcotcr Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
_ f
6~
&
">
/
S
f(
) C'
//
Clock
Time
i* 5-r
12. S'7
/2 !T7
/o 0 I
/-'3c=3
12CS"
/s/
77^
m'^j.
,c-^"
C'C-i
0:70
c.t<2
c.*l
0^l\
Orifice AM In. H20
Desired
.:> M"
;7 , 5"C*
.3,^5"
a . r^
11.^^
2 x S'S"
.A./'S"r
;^ . tV
Actual
.^.^•:r
.-i-S't?
,2,SV
^.S"5"
^>.^^
^. - S'S"
Jl./s-
^.c-'^T
Cry Gas Tcrnp. °F
Inlet
•S' 'i>
V3
f^
/t7:L
/ ^s"
. ,,d
/ d-o
//^'
//'-L
Outlet
7V
;5 6^
yo
zo
?/
v'^-
S; ':^-
S' ^/
Pump
Vacuum In.
Ng Gauge
u, --r
/ 4, -r"
/ s" S"
/ iT- 5"
/ J?' a
/I?. ^
m.o
/:*.<>-"
Box
Temp. °F
»
Impincjor
Temp °F
Stack
Press
In. Kg
Stack
Temp.0
/ X C-
>^3
I ^ <0
/ ^ X
• /^^"
ml
/z. X
//3
Comments :
-------
PARTICULATE- FIEL
DATA
Run No.
Lopation
Date
Operator
S c m p! c Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Ho
Assumed Mois.turo, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
M
/ 3
/ 3
/'^
/ "5
Ml
nf
Clock
Time
i3 a
! 3 /3
/o'. 5 ':?.(.'
/ .- - ' 'K--
, V -.-) • -..^
/•3/£:o~£
r^/f-:^o
/3/1?": '$C-
i-&y>:30
Dry Gas
Moicr.Cr-
JCC/.1^\
/C0$,v2.
/Ccvv>/>
b re/-'
/c&:tf$
loci i'i3
ICM.~?7C'
/cc-^r/
Pitot In.
l-!20 AP
C-$'Q
e.u-z.
r^-r
RtttffX
c-<*^~
0-^0
., _• .. s~>
Si Of
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
i.yo
Ttfr
-A-vsr
I.
f^» ^.
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inlet
t m
>m
iOC
of
Outlet
&l
^••f .-— ••
$ t>
s'r
few,
Pump
Vacuum In.
i-ig Gauge
/r, o'
/t/,sr'
7- ^
1 AAv;
Box
Temp. °F
^ /,'
Impingcr
Temp °F
33 <-/'->"/
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °
//3
• "3
/*?
Comments :
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run N o.
Location
Date
LLS3-J?
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settlirc, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
/£
/•T
/M
/3
/^
//
10
Clock
Time
—
/3 u/U,'3£
,->,••/' 5 /~\
/ -2 i-i (f t ^ >--
/31J&30
/33*£'3C'
/3^-3t-
/##/3C
/35£:#
Dry GGO
Meicr.CF
/?c- fitirt
icct-tf/
/Cc7,Jj
tcc%.':tf
/c/cu/.X
fC-ll^iO
/o/3,^'
fClS'.C'j
Pitot In.
H20 AP
tc
" ~ .'i
/.-^5"
1, 3 5""
/. 7,sr
n . ffo
* ,&0
3.C>~
2. 1C
Dry Gas Ternp. °F
Inlet
^- o/r
<;'3
S'4
r^'7
c>-.^.
7^
/ c? 0
/ --\ "•
/<-..>
Outlet
->Tc'U't\
%.^
S?^
ff3.
^3
^3 ,
rf3
tf^/
Pump
Vacuum in.
h!g Gauge
r^'t- •'
C-S"
6 , fT
f - 5"
/tx^r
io. O
ll.ST
/a - o
Ternp. °F
*[., F.
Impinfjcr
Ternp °F
tf.k i~i
\
Stack
Press
In. Hg
•
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run N o.
Lopoiion
Date
Operator
Scmplc Box No.
Meter Box No. _
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube .Correction Factor
M c t e r A
Point
?
tf
7 •
6
r'
t-i
i-i
Clock
Time
/.>£"tf.3£
income-
HICX3C
itjCUM
;U C{. or
nie&x
\LitfX
&
Df'y Gas
rlrbtcr.cp
10 1^'?0
iC(^.-"\h
JC3C*'*S'
/cv^.r/
Aa3^7
IC^M\\
tC^C'sC'/i
Pitot In.
H20 AP
0'^".
/** (£
c. ,» VT^
^, ^ 0
A / o. £~
/3..5'
/>>r"
/ 3. «r
/d^r
'u '
*:^ '-' "V-
Box
Tpmp. °F
.'
/^ '3>^
'*•"•' ;
In/'-'inrjcr
Tc'-iip °F
' 4
k
X
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Tern p. °F
l^d
1*6
i 3 i-l
J/&
r/cL
/o'7
Comments :
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
jun No. LL-SS -.3
.opotion
3atc
)p crater
i a rn p I c Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg :
Assumed Moisture, %
Heotcr Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
/
•-i
'.'••*~
'—>
O
i\
:r
/
u
~~>
/
Clock
Time
-
i ^23
/^•ZS~
M27
M:ic]
M"3/
M/33
U!3,r
Dry Gac
Mctor.CF
/?c Sfc
i03.U-?i
10.^-10
IC'lfl.tfi
/03C-//S"
/6-;Q..^'
/o^i^
i C3C. x\
Pitot In.
H20 AP
rt- T,
6/>'i-/(:i
6'1- i/^'
6^^'^
0 . fcO
' ac-
/.^ t-'
Box
Temp. °F
'°^rf 7/
Irnpingsr
Temp °F
<^
i
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
i oO
ji &
//4
^7
7/^-
1 t^L
/a £>
)ornmerits
/1 <
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Run Mo. 6C-55
Lopction
Dave
Operator
S c rn p 1 c D o x No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, In. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probo Tip Did. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH
Point
X
ci
1C
llL
1'L
/3
/3
/ 3>
Clock
Timo
yl' 0
! /"> r*>
/ C- •* (^-
Box
Temp. °F
/
*•
Impingor
Temp °F
»
Stack
Press
In. Ho
Stack
Temp. °F
j 2. 0
I * C
\^G
a?
H7
// d
Cornm&nts :
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
3un No.
_opotion
)a"fc
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp. °F
Bar Press, in. Hg
Assumed Moisture, %
Heater Box Settling, °F
Probe Tip Dia. , In.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
Pilot Tube Correction Factor
Meter AH ^
Point
M
M
Clock
Time
1 <-/$">,
•7^" i
Drj--. Gac
Mctcr.CF
j&l-J&'Ki
/0*G,G-'ti
A/ 'i '
v c:i.
)3-r,/ST
Pitot In.
H20 AP
C>- i-/^
£r» . ci'
Orifice AH In. H20
Desired
A 7 r
^
Actual
/..7s-
T^
A (,' 6-
•a . c? 7
Dry Gas Temp. °F
Inl^t
//•:•;
7C L/.^
A I/ :P-
^ 7 c
Outlet
£V
>-3
Pump
Vacuum In.
Mg Gauge
c/,d
A/1
Bo-
Tcmp.°F
33i/S'7
Irnplhfjcr
Ton-o °F
h
Stack
Press
In. Hg
Stack
Temp. °F
I Cll
-
,orn rncnts :
/
-------
PART I CUT, AT F. CLEANUP 'IIIF.MT
Date
un Number
5S ~
Operator:
T rc.
Sample box number: __//-/ -I 3 "/
Plant;
Location of sample port;JEWA'tiv^f ,1
Barometric pressure ;_3. 7.3V fo .3^.0.
Ambient temperature ; ^
7:x°/
°r
Impinger H?0
Volume after sampling ^ t-fX. ml
Volume collected t-/;x. ml
Impinger pref il'led with ;3 ml
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No.'
Extra No.
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
- container No. u S5 ~
No .
Filter number
- / S
Filter Papers and. Dry Filter Particulate
Container number Filter number
•V/-7/.) lY S S - 3 - /I ,
Container number
Silica Gel
VJeight after test: -3.^.ff,'?s
Weight before test: -a. c /. (^
Moistxire v;eight collected: o -Z."? •z'
Container number: 1. 2.
3.
4.
"53
Moisture
total <7
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
• i •• -
Location i--.v>v-:.
Date /}':*> -:•.- /Q
Tims 7, Pi >
Operator
/ • -/ /'
./..->- 7 .-,<, /LA-/
-,-•!.
Comments;
Test
l>t-.'- (-•>•-, /a.
/j
>-O >>..''/ ;>.-( .-.;••< i.--!.-
5> /.;' ' •' .
(co2) ....
•- Reading 1 -
/6, ^
•••> ^-.- •~r-'. — '
(o2)
Reading 2
?-_?. .-':;
z^L
?-'- ^-'-r "/ -
(CO)
Reading 3
// c-' ->
' ' -1 * < .
)^CJ
. 1^7,
-------
APPENDIX D
LABORATORY REPORT
The associated laboratory analyses were completed at Common-
wealth Laboratories, Richmond, Virginia two weeks after the samples
were collected. The laboratory report is appended here as submitted
for the calculation, CL's laboratory procedure is also included as
part of their procedure. In addition results from the EPA lab on
analysis of the inlet scrubber water are included.
-------
No.
COMMONWEAL TII LABORATORY
INCORPORATED
CHEMISTS DU1LDING. 22OO CAST OROAD STREET
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23223
December 13, 1971
71-102-05
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
p. o. nox BOZB
AREA COOC 70S
TELEPHONE: e4O-03SS
U. S. Steel, Lorain, Ohio. Laboratory results of particxilate weight
determinations and water collected. Three (3) runs were received marked
USS-1 through USS-3. The particulate weight distributions and water
collected in the various containers, 1 through 5, are shown below, along
with total particulate weight.
RUN' NUMBER
USS-1
Container No. 1 (Filter)
Particulate weight, in mg. 8.5
Container No. 2 (Acetone washings
from sample exposed surfaces prior
to filter.) Residue weight, in mg. 7.2
Volume of Condensate water
found in impingers, in ml
Weight of water found in silica
gel, (Container No. k)
Total moisture, in grams
Container No. 3 (impinger water)
'Water soluble residue in mg.
Organic residue, in mg (water
extract)
Container Mo. 5 (Acetone washings
of sample-exposed surfaces between
filter & fourth impinger)
Residue weight, in mg. 8.2
Water Wash of Tygon tube in mg. 2.9
Total particulate weight, mg. 40.7
Sulfur, as S02, in mg. 0.61*
USS-2
9-3
USS-3
15.9
. 7.2
31*5.0
37.6
382.6
U.8
9.1
5^.7
308.0
1*0.1
31*8.1
23.2
6,8
7.3
1*2.0
53.5
95.5
5.1*
9.1*
10,2 0.0
0.4 0.9
104.6 38.9
1.61* 1.1*6
Respectfully submitted,
(To be continued)
-------
I.AHOKATUHY
in, vim; IMA
-2-
(CONTINUED FROM PAGE l)
Water wash of tubing connecting
filter to 1st irapinger,
Water soluble, residue, mg
Organic extract, residue, nn_.
Sulfur, as S02, in mg.
RUN NUMBER
USS-1
2.9
OY-O
nil
USS-2
O.U
0.0
nil
USS-3
0.9
0.0
nil
Respectfully submitted,
-------
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS TABLES
Contained herein are: (1) a summary of weight data on samples,(2) the
results of the residue samples analysis, and (3) an analysis of the material
collected on the glass fiber filter. The data contained in the tables should
be considered only as a general guide.
The type of -i^d^fc^'•'pj."formed was not anticipated at the beginning of
the program and decisions regarding sample preparation and methods of analysis
demanded an immediate response. The resulting analysis scheme was devised,
on short notice, to fit the general laboratory practice, making it possible
to respond to the-'p: L^iyam ..eeds as quickly as possible.
Following is a discussion of the methods used in the analysis scheme.
No claim is made however that the analysis scheme used is the best nor the
best approach to the problems involved. It is believed to be technically
sound, to provide reliable data, and to be within the limitations noted in
the discussion.
Discussion of Methods
. The methods used for the chemical analysis of residues were chosen because
they represent reliable procedures used almost routinely in our laboratory.
Because of this no pririniinary testing nor experimentation were required before
the analytical work was begun and results could be obtained in the short time
allowed. No claim is made that these methods represent the best analytical
1 £ J-l..'_ .,„„!,
:>i*iicmc iwi in to t«ji i\.
The methods used for determining chloride and ammonium ion are quite
sensitive. Reasonable readings above blanks assure reliable results down to
about 0.03 rng in the residue sample. The methods have the added advantage of
being able to handle samples which unpredictably contain large amounts of
these ions.
The gravimetric method for sulfate lacks the sensitivity one might desire
for this type of work if measurement of less than 1 milligram is necessary.
However, it is capable of determining the occasional high sulfate found in
some samples without repeating the determination as would be necessary when
using some methods.
The nitrate determination is adequate when the NH^+ content of the samples
is low or is present in amounts approaching the concentration of NOs". Being
a "difference" method it is least effective in determining small amounts of
N03~ in the presence of large amounts of NH^. However, even in the most
unfavorable combinations it will indicate the presence of about 1 mg of N03~.
-------
TABLE D-I-' •
United States Steel
Summary of Weight Data on Samples*
Determinations Requested: Weight of materials found, mg.
Type of Analyses: Category OES, VAS /v
USS-Run 2 USS-Run
(a) Includes: B--front half acetone wash
(b) Includes:
C--Impinger water and wash
C Ext--Impinger water extract
E--Impinger acetone wash - —
F--Tygon umbilical tube HpO wash - ~
F Ext--Tygon tube FLO wasn extract
NOTE: Summary does not contain filter values.
Sum of all metals found, mg
Sum of all anions found, mg
Acetone soluble organic matter, mg
Overall total
Total found by EPA, mg
3.8
0.4
5.2
9.4
54.7
8.0
2.3
17.0
27.3
40.6
* Analysis conducted by Battelle Laboratories for EPA.
-------
TABLE D-II
United States Steel Test 1
Analysis Results of Residue Samples*
Results Given in Micrograms Per Total Sample.
Determinations Requested: Priority 1 and 2 elements
Type of Analyses:
Element
Hg
Be
Cd
As
V
Mn
Ni
Sb
Cr
Zn
Cu
Pb
Se
B
h
Li
Ag
Sn
Fe
Sr
Na
K
Ca
Si
Mg
Al
Optical Emission -£'--nctrography (OES)
USS-Run 2^b)
-------
TABLE D-III
. ' . United States Steel Test No. 1
Analysis Results of Residue Samples*
Determinations Requested: pH, total acid, SOT, Cl"
Types of Analyses: , Category Visual Absorption Spectrography (VAS)^3'
Analysis for USS-Run 2^ USS-Run
_^~-.-^:—_i _____________________
pH -••• ' 6.8 .' 6.6
H+ <0.004 0.048
S04= <0.5 <0.5
Cl" 0.44 2.24
(a) Results of water soluble portion of total sample. Results given in
milligrams (except pH).
(b) Includ??' P—f^ont h^if Breton*?
(c) Includes:
C--Impinger water and wash .... ..
C Ext — Impinger water extract
E--Impinger acetone wash
F--Tygon umbilical tube H20 wash
F Ext. — Tygon tube H20 wash extract
* Analysis cor-sbcted by Battelle Laboratories for EPA.
-------
TABLE D-IV
United States Steel Test No. 1
Analysis of Material Collected on Glass Fiber. Filter*
Determinations Requested: Priority 1 and 2 elements; pH, Anions
Type of Analyses: Optical Emission Spectrography and Chemical
(Category Visual Absorption)
Element
Hg
Be
Cd
As
V
Mn
Ni
Sb
Cr
Zn
Cu
Pb
Se
B
F
Li
Ag
Sn
Fe
Sr
Na
K
Ca
Si
Mg
Bi
Mo
Ti
Zr
Ba
Al
Results Expressed as ug per Complete
USS-Run 2
<1. -
<2.
<20.
<50.
10.
200.
4.
<10.
10.
13,000.
10.
130.
•
4,000.
-
<5.
<3.
— <_1 0 .
2,000. - -
200.
13,000.
8,000.
13,000. .
1,200.
<2.
<5.
130.
90.
13,000.
8,000.
Filter Circle
Blank'3'
<1.
<2.
<20.
<50.
<5.
10.
<2.
<10.
5.
6,000.
2.
50.
-
2.000.
-
<5.
<3.
<10.
100.
100.
8,000.
4,000.
10,000.
Major(c)
600.
<2.
<5.
60.
25.
6,000.
4,000.
-------
TABLE D-IV (Continued)
Chemical Determinations
Analysis For
pH
H+
so4=
cr
co3=
HCO/
USS-Run 2 ., Blank
.;. -B;C (b)
(b)
<1,000.,,. - (b)
.-,'^JDOi-. (b)
N (b)
4,300. (b)
(a) Blank values not subtracted from run data. Two test filters were
analyzed therefore, the bleak values must be doubled before subtracting.
(b) Blank filter not analyzed
(c) Major element in composition of filter.
N None found
* Analysis conducted by Battelle Laboratories for EPA.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Subject; United States Steel Scrubber Water Sample
The results of the Golvent extraction and pH tests on the scrubber
inlet water are shown below:
Solvent extraction
Sample partieu Late,mg . £H Volume, ml
Scrubber inlet 5.8 5.78* 810
*Particulate was filtered out before analysis!
Note: Solvent extraction blank was
-------
AIR AND WATER
CAMPLING, ANALYSIS
COMMONWEALTH LABORATORY
INCORPORATED p. o. oox 0020
CHEMISTS BUILDING, 22OQ EAST OROAD STREET AREA CODE 7O3
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23223 TELEPHONE, 640.a38o
LABORATORY ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
The following is a detailed outline of the laboratory procedure
used in determining the weights of particulate. and water collected
in the various containers resulting from sample recovery from field
collection trains.
All glassware used for evaporation and residue determinations
in the following steps was purchased new for this purpose. The new
beakers were first soaked in kO% nitric acid for. several hours. The
beakers were then washed and rinsed with distilled water followed by
oven-drying. After drying the beakers were descicated to constant
weight and kept in a descicator until used. Beakers were weighed to
+0.1 mg.'
™~* i
A. Container No. 1 (Filter)
1.) Preparation
The filters are oven-dried @ 105°C for a minimum
of four hours, and then desnicated to constant weight.
Filters are weighed to +_.0001 grams. After weighing
the filters are placed in plastic petri dishes until
used.
2.) Particulate weight determination
Filter and any loose particulate matter are trans-
ferred to a tared glass weighing dish, and descicated
to constant weight. The weight gain is then recorded.
B. Container No. 2 (Acetone washings prior to filter)
1.) These acetone washings are. received in glass bottles,
are measured and transferred to the tared beakers pre-
pared as described above.
2.) The acetone washings are then allowed, to evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. The beakers
are covered with ribbed cover glasses to. facilitate
evaporation without allowing dust or other foreign matter
into the beakers. When dry, the beakers are descicated
to constant weight. Beakers are weighed to nearest 0.1 mg.
3. ) A blank of the acetone (measured amount) is evaporated
also as described above. Any residue resulting from this
-------
COMMO\\vr..\I.TII l.AIIOUATOHY
I.M lllirilK.VI Kll
KICJIMONO II). ViHUINlA
-2-
blank is used to correct for the amount of acetone used in
the washings. The net weight is the required particulate
residue.
C. Container No. 3 (impinger water plus water rinsings)
1.) The volume of impinger water has been measured at the
recovery station and recorded. Our laboratory measures
the final volumes in these containers which allows us to
determine the volume of washings used and to 'correct for
this water using a blank.
2.) After measuring the volume of water, the solution is trans-
ferred to a separatory funnel. The organic particulate is
then extracted using three 25 ml portions of chloroform,
followed by three 25 ml portions of ethyl ether. The or-
ganic solvents are then combined and washed once, with 100
ml of distilled water. The combined solvents are transferred
to a tared beaker (prepared as above) and evaporated at
70°F until dry. The samples are then descicated to constant
weight.
A blank of the distilled water used in the impingers and
washings is also extracted with the chloroform and ether.
The organic extract is then used as a blank for the organic
particulate and the water phase as a blank for the impinger
water and washings. The water phase is evaporated at 212°F
until dry. The residue is descicated to constant weight, and
corrected for any blank found.
D. Container Ho. 1* (Silica gel)
1, ) Preparation
The silica is placed in a wide mouth, plastic bottle and capped.
The bottle plus silica gel is then weighed to ^0.1 gm.
2.) After sampling, the bottle plus used silica gel is weighed to
nearest 0.1 gm and weight of water collected is determined.
E. Container No. 5 (Acetone washings-back)
1.) Acetone washings are first measured and then transferred to
tared beakers (prepared as above) and allowed to evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. Upon drying, the
beakers are descicated to constant weight. A blank of the ace-
tone used is also evaporated and any corrections due to the ace-
tone are made if necessary. Beakers are weighed to nearest 0.1 mg.
-------
APPENDIX E
TEST LOG
All four members of the test^ciup. arrived at the Lorain
Works U.S. Steel Corporation on Monday afternoon, November 15,
1971. After a safety meeting conference the test equipment was
carried to the test platform and assembled. The daily test log
is offered in Table G-l. The test was completed Thursday evening
about 5 p.m.
-------
TABLE E-l
DAILY TEST LOG
RUN NO. DATE/START
TIME
Nov.
USS-1 £ Nov.
<'•'• Nov .
Nov.
Nov.
Nov .
USS-2 Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
USS-3 Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
Nov .
Nov.
16/0943
16/1108
16/1144
16/1249
16/1400
16/1446
17/1010
17/1211
17/1248
17/1327
17/1406
17/1443
18/0951
18/1027
18/1137
18/1249
18/1344
18/1423
HEAT NO.
N-33409
N-33411
N-33412
N-33413
.N-33415 •
N-33416
N-33429
N-33432
N-33433
N-33434
N-33435
N-33436
N-33446
N-33447
N-33449
N-33451
N-33452
N-33453
STACK/PORT SAMPLE
TIME (MIN) . COMMENTS
East/2 38 -, Traversing and
•f: .-y; moisture deterrnin-
''!/•• at ion
» n
B*-.st/2 157 ..£ »5. ;•
V'. "> ? • .'
East/2 f '^
East/2
East/1
East/2
East/2 143 repair probe short
East/2
East/1
East/1
East/I
East/1
t
East/2 169
East/2
West/3
East/1
East/1
East/1
U.S. Steel heat code
-------
APPENDIX F
PRETEST SURVEY
-------
PRETEST SURVEY
U.S. STEEL COMPANY
BASIC OXYGEN FURNACE
LORAIN, OHIO
SUBMITTED TO
MR. GENE RILEY PROJECT OFFICER
OFFICE OF AIR PROGRAMS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
NORTH CAROLINA 2711
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE, INC.
600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE. N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20037
NOVEMBER 1, 1971
-------
PRETEST SURVEY OF U.S. STEEL CO.
Introduction
A pretest survey was conducted on October 28, 1971, at a
basic oxygen furnace (BOF) at the United States Steel Co.'s
Lorain, Ohio p'l^v.t-1: • • nessr- . C.E. (Gene) Riley of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and Terrence Li Puma of Engineering- ,
Science, Inc. (ES) meet with Mr. Russ Stinson of U.S. Steel and
*-y..- •*. • r
discussed ES requirements for source testing the BOF off gas stacks
during the week of ^November 15, 1971. Scheduled field tests will
determine the mass emission rate of particulates, concentration
of CO, 0~> CO- and stack gas moisture content.
Plant Operations
The BOF shop is comprised of vessels each having capacities .'
of approx. 220 tons-s^i-r-heat. Feed composition consists of scrap
steel, hot metal and miscellaneous alloying materials. A complete
heat cycle (from chirping to pouring) is generally flccoTPplished
within 30 to 35 minutes including a 20 minute oxygen blowing period.
Mr. Sauder, superintendent of the BOF shop, indicated that normal
operating periods are from 9am to 5pm and from 9pm to Sam. Ex-
haust gases from these vessels are passed through a two stage .
venturi scrubber and then to a carbon monoxide flare at the stack
exit. Efficiency data on the units may be available since U.S.
Steel has recently conducted "in house emission tests." The plant
presently has two dual stage systems complete with individual stacks.
The stack is constructed of 3/8" steel approximately 6 feet
in diameter and stands 150' feet above ground. A rectangular
platform at an approximate elevation of 42 feet, supported by columns
and accessible by an internal stair system, surrounds both stacks.
The existing 4" ID sampling parts are located 84" and 72" above
the platform's crossed "bar grating (see sketch).
-------
Equipment
ES plans to utilize one complete RAG train (accompanied by
duplicate glassware) and an 8 foot glass lined heated probe to
perform particulate sampling. CO, CL and CCL will be determined
with an ES Orsat analyser. Safety equipment (hats, goggles etc.)
lights, extension cords, walkie-talkie, stop watches, acetone,
distilled water, filters and other supplies necessary for sampling
will also be furnished by E.S.
Laboratory Analyses
Laboratory analysis ( primarily weight determination) will be
made at our Richmond laboratories within 2 work days after the
last test day at USS. All samples will be hand carried to our lab
facilities. F.ach day at the conclusion of the testing, Orsat
analysis will be performed on gases collected in mylar bags during
that day. . .'
-------
SClIEDmj.NG & STAFFING
Two ES personnel will drive to Lorain with the sampling equip-
ment and arrive at the plant by noon Monday, November 15, 1971.
The remaining two ES men will fly to Cleveland on Monday morning
and drive a van to Lorain to meet with EPA and USS officials.
The van will be rented for use -«as-a..ri., an-up area during testing
and as a storeroom in the evening.
ES staff will consist of Messrs. M.E. Lukey (Project Director)
John Chehaske, (SP) , J.M. Fayad.lv'and a technician. The technician
will be assigned to keep records-of the EOF operations during all
tests. A detailed manpower assignment is listed in Table I. The
timing for completing the job are shown in Figure I.
-------
TABLE I
TASK
Pretest survey and report
Assemble & pack equipment
Conduct field tests
Unpack & clean equipment
Laboratory analyses
fcata reduction
•prepare draft report
prepare final report
MANPOWER ASSIGNMENTS
JOB
CLASSIFICATION
1 engineer
1 technician
1 sr. engineer
1 engineer
2 technicians
1 technician
1 chemist
1 lab. technician
1 engineer
1 technician
1 sr. engineer
1 engineer
1 sr. engineer
DAYS
5
4
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
4
5
5
1
MAN
HOURS
40
32
40
40
80
16
16
16
16
32
40
40
8_
TOTAL 416
Other direct charges (except travel, supplies and equipment
maintenance).
Rental of truck van.
-------
TASK
WORK WEEK BEGINNING ON MONDAYS
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
25 1 3 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 .3 ' 10
PRETEST SURVEY AND REPORT
ASSEMBLE AND PACK EQUIPMENT
CONDUCT FIELD TESTS
UNPACK AND CLEAN EQUIPMENT
LABORATORY ANALYSES
DATA PvEDUCTION
PREPAPJE DRAFT REPORT
PREPARE FINAL REPORT
FIGURE I
TIME SEQUENCE DIAGRAM OF SOURCE TEST AT U.S. STEEL COMPANY.
-------
PRELIMINARY SURVEY
Name of Company
'
Address iff") (r ^'-
City
Plant Telephone Number ,.-?/(., - 3"?'?- :^^-' FTS Number_
Description of ProctvL ~?."i .-//v •/.-' ./- -:^./>-->r/..
Date of survey /f/.}.?/
State
Name of Contacts v7)/7. //-/,-; .-.n. ~/i' •/>',• /r.-..yf-v>'.> Title ,/?:i//-. ".2^/v^. /• .^ £~!'.,?. ^--. />.•:>•
Title /^-.f. ;./-:.^-v.
Operating Schedule of Process ff /j i( } - -j P/ty
Batch or Continuous Prsress
Feed Composition and Rates
7
> // .
^V. )
~7 {&*-'•;/•
~
Type of Fuel
Production Rate ^Si
T / !
Description of Air Pollution Control Equipment and Operation
/-A"
-
-------
Page 2 - Preliminary Survey
Assumed Constituents of Stack Gas for Each Sampling Site
Possible Testing Sites (1)
(2) :
(3)
(4)
Can Samples be Collected of:
a. Ravi materials
b. Control equipment effluent (.-'<-.
. IT
c. Ash
d.. Scrubber water
e. Product
f. Fuel
g. Other
Signature Required on^ Passes
Best Time to Test
Waivers
Are the Following Available at the Plant?
a. Parking Facilities
i,<
b. Electric Extension Cords /-V-
c. Electrician
d. Safety Equipment
e. Ice
f. Acetone
g. Distilled water
L'Q
fjp
h. Vleighing Balance
i. Clean-up Area .
j.. Laboratory Facilities
k. Sampling Ports
1. Scaffolding
m. Restroom
n. Vending Machines
(.•. &
-
' <'<
-------
Page 3 - Preliminary Survey
1. Electricity Source
a. Amperage per circuit _
/ '
b. Location of fuse box /i/-;'V?-/l
c. Extension cord lengths
d. Adapters needed?
-,/ /% /}lf(-lP • -*- /cA?'
2. Safety Equipment Needed
a. Hard hats
b. Safety glasses
c. Goggles
d. Safety shoes
e. Alarms
f. Other
3. Ice
a. Vendor
b. Location
4. Acetone
a. Vendor (£'/"'<:'"/J
b. Location
c. Telephone
5. Sampling Ports
a. Who will provide /<-,o/t-V welder:
b. Size opening
6. Scaffolding
a. Height __
b. Length _
c. Vendor
y
Address
'I-
Telephone
//,).
/ Jr / IS'.
/—c; A^c;
-------
Page 4 - Preliminary Survey
.' Motels:
a.
b. -/.//'.(f o .-•> • / -7/r'AJ
c.
Restaurants:
a. Near Plant
,,'^t.fffi.
y- CF & PhoneJ?/y. ffi n -.^// Rate'
Phone • 3'2x/ -5"*/// Rate
Phone
Rate
b. Near Motel
9. Airport Convenient to Plant
Comments:
Distance
SURVEY DY
-------
STACK DATA
Properties of
Sampling Locations
Purpose of stack
Height ft.
Width ft.
Length ft.
Diameter ft. I.D.
Wall thickness in.
Material of construction
Ports: a. Existing
b. Size opening
c. Distance of
Platform
Straight distance before
port
Type of restriction
Straight distance after
port
Type of restriction
c p i f ^ j^ rj r. m P n i"
Work space
Ambient temp. °F
Avg. pitot reading H-jO.-OT^ig
Stack velocity F/M
SCFM
Moisture % by volume
Stack temperature °F
Particulate loading gr/SCF
Particle size
Gases present
Stack pressure li^.0, in Hg
Water Sprays
Dilution air
Elevator
Stack //I
.
<
/'
.(.''.- - -
•y*-'A*
•S>iV- ~ -
1*
.
%^>
,o.
./, .
•- • / •• ••* / / <-'
/- 1. '.; / :•' (. :')
~r "- ^6 c
. -? /'- . (^
.£<.-'•-•&
4<<:^(!
/£•'/*'/••>-
/-jc-f
•'{
™<.it.
,-c. o' •-,_, r...\.
-.of
<'/fS
'V».
/Jo.
Stack //2
• •
-
Stack //3
-
Stack //4
jk
| S o o
-------
Provide Diagram of Each Sampling Site. Include the Follov/ing Information:
Dimensions to nearest obstruction in all directions from sampling
port.
Complete description of all ports including all dimensions. Description
of any unusual features about ^environment; height, odors, toxic conditions,
temperature, dust, etc.
-------
Sketch of Stack to bo Sampled Showing Locations of Port Openings, Water
Sprayers, Flow Interferences, Dilution Air Inlets, and Scaffolding or
Platform Erection Dimensions
[4.
JO'l t.'',
-------
APPENDIX G
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
Four people were engaged in the successful completion of the
field studies at the Lorain plant. The participants are listed
belo'=7 by name and company job title.
NAME COMPANY JOB TEST LEVEL
TITLS
Michael E. Lukey Associate Engineer Project Engineer
Paul Koch Sanitary Engineer Engineer
John T. Chehaske Chemical Engineer Engineer
John Kline Chemist Technician
Messers. Chehaske and Kline are located in the team's laboratory
complex in Richmond, Virginia. Lukey and Koch work out of Washington
D.C. The analytical portion of this testing project was directed by
Thomas O'Connor. M. Dean High acted as overseer and managed the entire
project. .
-------
OTHER BASIC OXYCKN FURNACE LOCATIONS
TESTED BY KPA
• gy^x^yfi-''"" -.-. ' . ' . - LOCATION
Anaco Steel Hiddletown, Ohio
Alan Wood Ltv^J.A v Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
United States C^sil rfb,^ Lorain, Ohio
National Steel Weirton, West Virginia
Bethlehea Steel . Bsthlehen, Pennsylvania
------- | |