TEST NUMBER FA-2
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
FERROALLOYS DIVISION
MARIETTA, OHIO
by
R. N. Allen
Resources Research, Inc.
A Subsidiary of TRW Inc.
7600 Colshire Drive
McLean, Virginia 22101
Contract Number CPA 70-81
-------
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
II. INTRODUCTION 3
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 6
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION 13
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS 17
VI. PROCESS OPERATION ..... 21
VII. SAMPLING PROCEDURES 22
VIII. CLEANUP AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 23
IX. DISCUSSION 24
A. Results 24
B. Operating Conditions ..... 32
C. Test Conditions 33
X. APPENDIX 39
; A. Complete Particulate Results with
Example Calculations
B. Complete Gaseous Results with
Example Calculations
C. Complete Operation Results
D. Field Data
E.I Sampling Procedures
E.2 Cleanup and Analytical Procedures
F. Laboratory Report
G. Test Logs - .
H. Related Reports
I. Project Participants and Titles
J. Particle Sizing Samples
K. Chemical Analysis of Emissions
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
1
2
3
4
5
Title
Summary
Summary
Summary
Summary
General
of
of
of
of
Results
Results
Results
Results
Data MCA
and Scrubber Efficiency
- Scrubber Exhaust
- Scrubber Inlet
- Tapping Exhaust
- EPA Tests
Page
6
8-9
10-11
12
16
Plus Appendixes A, B, C, D, F, and G.
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
1 .
2'
3
4
5
Title
Flow Diagram, Sample Locations
Process Flow Diagram - Furnace #1
Scrubber Inlet Duct - Sample Point Locations
Scrubber Exhaust Duct - Sample Point Locations
Tapping Exhaust - Sample Point Locations
Page
4
14
18
19
20
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Source emission tests are being performed on a series of electric
furnace installations, known as reactive metals or ferroalloys, fpr the
Office of Air Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. These surveys
include the determination of filterable and total particulate matter,
s,ulfur dioxide, particle size analyses and chemical analyses for a variety
of furnace formulations and control devices. The series of tests, con-
tained in this report, were performed at the Union Carbide Corporation,
Ferroalloys Division, P. 0. Box 299, Marietta, Ohio, 45750.
Emissions from this particular plant were determined for a silico-
manganese, 2% carbon grade furnace (No. 1). This unit was hooded, with
two parallel Venturi type scrubbers leading to a single exhaust stack.
Two draft fans, located after each scrubber, forced the scrubbed gases
into the stack. The 8 foot diameter exhaust stack was provided with a
single 3-inch sample port, while the horizontally mounted, rectangular
inlet duct was sampled through five properly spaced ports for equal area
sampling.
»•
In addition, two parallel tapping exhausts were tested. These exhaust
gases involved no scrubbing device and the stacks were sampled through the
single port as provided. All sample locations are shown in Figure 1 on the
following page. Further detailed diagrams and descriptions are included in
Sections IV and V of this report (Process Description and Location of
Sampling Points).
-------
EXHAUST _|
SAMPLE L
LOCATION
SCAFFOLDING
INLET
SAMPLE
LOCATION
TWO
SCRUBBERS
IN
PARALLEL
WEST TOP
EXHAUST
FIGURE 1. FLOW DIAGRAM, SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Source emission tests are being performed on a series of electric
furnace installations, known as reactive metals or ferroalloys, for the
Office of Air Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. These surveys
include the determination of filterable and total particulate matter,
qulfur dioxide, particle size analyses and chemical analyses for a variety
of furnace formulations and control devices. The series of tests, con-
tained in this report, were performed at the Union Carbide Corporation,
Ferroalloys Division, P. 0. Box 299, Marietta, Ohio, 45750.
Emissions from this particular plant were determined for a silico-
manganese, 2% carbon grade furnace (No. 1). This unit was hooded, with
two parallel Venturi type scrubbers leading to a single exhaust stack.
Two draft fans, located after each scrubber, forced the scrubbed gases
into the stack. The 8 foot diameter exhaust stack was provided with a
single 3-inch sample port, while the horizontally mounted, rectangular
inlet duct was sampled through five properly spaced ports for equal area
sampling.
In addition, two parallel tapping exhausts were tested. These exhaust
gases involved no scrubbing device and the stacks were sampled through the
single port as provided. All sample locations are shown in Figure 1 on the
following page. Further detailed diagrams and descriptions are included in
Sections IV and V of this report (Process Description and Location of
Sampling Points).
-------
EXHAUST .-<
SAMPLE Li
LOCATION
SCAFFOLDING
NORTHEAST
TWO
SCRUBBERS
IN
PARALLEL
WALL OF
PLANT
INLET
SAMPLE
LOCATION
EAST TOP
EXHAUST
DUCT
HOOD
FURNACE
HOOD
\J.
WEST TOP
EXHAUST
HOOD
FIGURE 1. FLOW DIAGRAM, SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-------
Within this survey period of July 27 to August 5, 1971, three different
scrubber conditions were tested. Conditions A, B and C were set at scrubber
pressure drops of 57, 47, and 37 inches of water, respectively. Normal
scrubber operation employs the 57 inch setting.
During this particular survey particulate matter was sampled using the
EPA train as described in Appendix E-l. Sulfur oxides were sampled using
the Shell Development method and integrated combustion gases were sampled
in a gas bag with analysis by standard Orsat. Particle size was measured
in situ with an Andersen Sampler and a Brink Sampler. The overall survey
included 26 particulate emission runs, 14 Orsat measurements, 11 sulfur
dioxide samples, 6 metal filters and 23 particle size distribution
analyses.
-------
k«
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Shown below in Table 1 are the average results for each "in" and
"out" scrubber condition and phe corresponding collection efficiencies. .,
Table 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
Stack Exhaust (Outlet) Inlet Duct
Scrubber Particulate Particulate S02 Particulate Particulate Percent
Date(1971) Condition grains/SCF Ib/hr ppro grains/SCF Ib/hr Efficiency
7/31-8/1 A,AP 0.0101 9.76 1. l.?5 1090 99.1
=57" H20
8/1-8/2 B.AP 0.0166 16.7 1. 2.05 L790 99.1
= 47" H20
8/3-8/4 C,AP 0.0479 44.0 1. 1.53 1190 96;. 3
= 37" H20 :
Tjie apparent efficiencies were the same for Condition A and Condition
B. However, note that the highest scrubber pressure drop, during Condition
A, was coupled with the lowest inlet particulate loading. Condition C
definitely indicated the lowest collection efficiency. During this
particular condition, both the scrubber pressure drop and the inlet
particulate loading were at very low levels.
-------
Particulate and gaseous emission summaries for scrubber exhaust,
scrubber inlet and tapping exhaust locations are shown in Tables 2, 3,
and 4 on the following pages. Flue gas conditions are included and
percent particulate matter in the impinger train has been calculated.
SC>2 emission levels were extremely low. Almost all individual
results were less than 1. ppm. Other similar processes have indicated
SO- emission levels up to 20 ppm with no scrubbing devices (i.e., Foote
Mineral Company, Steubenville, Ohio). In this particular survey, there
was no indication of any trend with SO emission levels.
Gas temperatures and velocities during the exhaust sampling remained
smooth, as expected for a location equipped with wet scrubber and con-
stant speed draft fans. However, sharp variations were noted at the
inlet duct, especially the wide variation in temperature. It is believed
that these variations were inherent in the furnace design. Furthermore,
the inlet sampling location was unusually .close to the furnace itself.
The east and west tapping exhaust stacks, provided with no scrubbing
devices, emitted average particulate levels of 19 and 48 pounds per hour,
respectively, but these are not continuous emissions. Normal emission
.-»*'.•"
from the continuously operated scrubber is approximately 10 pounds per
hour.
Particle size of emissions (usually sub microns) are shown in Appendix J
and chemical analyses (quite variable) are shown in Appendix K.
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER EXHAUST
, p..
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate -v SCFM * dry
% W^ter Vapor - 7« Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
% 09 - Vol % dry
*
7. Excess air (? sampling point
S0~ Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF (§ Stack Conditions
lbs./hr..
Particulate from Impinger
Train (% of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
lbs./hr.
Stack Temperature
MlE-1
7/27/71
113,000
18.5
2,1
19.2
1110
0.158
•!•
0.0103
0.00728
9.97
38.
0.0166
0.0117
16.1
140
**
M1E-2
7/29/71
112,200
15.4
3.4
18.3
723
5.21
-
0.00710
0.00520
6.83
T5.
0.0110
0.00805
10.5
140
M1E-3
7/30/71
122,100
12.9
1.9
18.6
729
0
-
0.0107
O.t)0839
11.2
1^..
0.0122
0.00956
12.8
118
M1E-4
7/31/71
116,800
15.8
2.8
18.8
917
0.266
- '
0.00813
0.00594
8.14
_L6.
0.00967
0.00706
9.68
139
MlE-5
7/31/71
110,200
17.2
3.3
18.4
757
0.302
-
0.00889
0.00684
8.39
15.
0.0105
0.00807
9.91
140
*
M1E-6
-
-
-
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
-
-
- .
-
** Plant running at approximate one half-load.
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER EXHAUST (CONTINUED)
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - 7» Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
% 0, - Vol % dry
• * *•
% Excess air @ sampling point
S0? Emissions -• ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
J\,
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
g'r/CF & Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (7» of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature
M1E-7
8/1/71
118,100
16.1
3.0
18.6
827
-
- -
0.0150
0.0111
15.2
12.
0.0170
/
«t
0.0126
17.2 .
135
M1E-8
8/2/71
115,000
18.2
3.2
18.6
845
0.587
0.0180
0.0132
17.7
9.
0.0197
O."0144
19.4
127
MlE^-9
8/2/71
121,100
15.3
3.4
18.5
815
0.0340
- -
0.0114
O.t)0831
11.8
13.
0.0131
0.00955
13.6
134
M1E-10
8/3/71
114,300
17.6
3.2
18.8
964
0.737
-
0.0138
0.0100
13.5
4.
0.0144
0.0104
14.1
130
M1E-11
8/3/71
112,000
16.7
3.2
18.6
845
-
-
0.0369
0.0270
35.4
17.
0.0445
0.0326
42.7
133
M1E-12
8/4/71
103,200
17.6
3.1
18.7
890
-
-
0.0798
0.0576
70.6
6.
0.0849
0.0613
75.1
132
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER INLET
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7o Water Vapor - °L Vol.
7» C02 - Vol % dry
% 09 - Vol % dry
• • ^
7o Excess air (? sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
NO^ Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF <
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER INLET (CONTINUED)
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7. Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vpl % dry
7. 09 - Vol % dry
*• *>
7o Excess air (? sampling point
S0~ Emissions - ppm dry
NO^ Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (7. of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr,
Stack Temperature
MID- 10
8/3/71
91,000
4.61
N/A
ii
ii
0.965
0.431
752.6
1.7
0.982
0.438
765.9
655
MID-11
8/3/71
85,000
8.9
N/A
ii
ii
1.66
0.709
1209.
1.8
1.69
0.722
1231.
654
MID-12
8/4/71
94,900
4.8
N/A
ii
it
1.91
0.948
1553.
0.5
1.92
0.953
1562.
541
?
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
11
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - TAPPING EXHAUST
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% CO 2 - Vol 7. dry
7» 09 - Vol 7. dry
^ *»
7« Excess air (? sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
N(3 Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF (§ Stack Conditions
lbs./hc.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (7, of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature
ETE-1
8/5/71
70,100
4.95
f*
-
N/A
-
-
3.0358
0.0316
21.5
2.
0.0366
0.0323"
22.0
107
ETE-2
8/5/71
70,000
4.12
-
- '
N/A
/
D.0249
0.0224
14.94
10.
0.0275
0.0248
16.5
100
ETE-3
8/5/71
69,700
3.74
-
' -•
N/A
0-833
-
0.0284
0 .'0258
16.96
8.
0.031
WTE-1
8/5/71
64,250
3.11
0.2
21.2
N/A
3.703
-
0.128
0.114
70.5
20.
0.160
0.0282 ! 0.1429
18.5
97
88.2
111
WTE-2
8/5/71
61,800
3.32
0.1
20.9
N/A
0361
-
0.0483
0.0428
25.6
30.
0.0696
0.0616
36.9
115
WTE-3 .:•
8/5/71
64,700
2.72
0.1
21.2
N/A
-
-
0.0169
0.0153
9.37
48.
0.0329
0.0297
18.25
107
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
12
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Reactive metals are generally ferroalloys which are produced in
submerged arc electric furnaces. The facility under consideration in
this report is an open furnace, with hooding and a scrubbing system to
reduce the emission of fumes and dust following collection. Figure 2
is a qross sectional view process flow diagram indicating the actual
furnace under test in this survey.
The electric arc is employed as a concentrated source of heat.
Chrome, manganese and other ores are added to the surface of the furnace
through mechanized equipment and chutes. Additional carbon in the form
of coke, wood chips, etc., is an integral part of the furnace mix,
along with specialized fluxes, etc. The mix is added directly to the
surface of the furnace through chutes and is then spread over the surface
with stoking machines.
The very high temperatures produced initiate a reaction in the bottom
of the furnaces and form a layer of metal which is tapped at appropriate
times. As the ores and carbonaceous materials gradually settle to the
9* '
bottom of the furnace, the heat, in conjunction with a lack of oxygen,
react with the oxide ores in order to remove oxygen and thus produce the
elemental metal. Escaping gases, composed largely of carbon monoxide, are
burned at the surface of the furnace in the so-called open units.
13
-------
(ATMOSPHERE
ORES, ETC.
CHUTES
\
EXHAUST
PRODUCT
MOLDS
(ATMOSPHERE )
ELECTRICAL
POWER
CARBON
REDUCING
AGENTS
FLUXES, ETC.
ELECTRODES
CHUTES
HOOD
x_ i r
A
ELECTRIC ARC
FURNACE
DUST
COLLECTION
SYSTEM
J HOOD
LADLE
SAMPLE
LOCATIONS
SLAG
DISPOSAL
FIGURE 2. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
FURNACE //I
14
-------
Furnace 1 is a 27 megawatt furnace producing a silico-manganese
product using Soderberg type electrodes, formed in place from a "paste",
rather than using prebaked carbon electrodes. Induced draft fans are
employed to pull fumes from various hoods into the exhaust system. Gases
and fumes from the normal furnace operation are passed through two
parallel venturi scrubber systems for cleaning, prior to discharge into
the atmosphere. The collection of fumes around the furnace is almost
100 per cent effective during normal operation.
The furnace is tapped at intervals of approximately one and a half
hours, depending upon the total power fed and thereby the amount of metal
produced. Metal and slag pour into ladles and fumes are drawn off, without
collection devices, by hoods and two exhaust systems. The slag is removed
from the ladle arid disposed of by various means. Molten product is poured
into molds, after which it is broken into usable sizes.
i- .
Additional furnace and scrubber process data is shown in Table 5 on
the following page.
15
-------
TABLE 5
August 6, 1971
GENERAL DATA MCA-EPA TESTS
Furnace:
Product:
Test Period:
Tap Time:
Estimated Weight of Raw
Materials Fed to Furnace
During Test:
Composition of Raw Material:
KW on Furnace During Test:
Water Recirculated to Each
Venturi (2) - GPM:
Up Water Each -Venturi -
GPM:
Water Spray to Each Fan (2) -GPM:
Pressure Drop Across Venturi -
Inches of 1^0 :
Opacity at Stack after Moisture
Plume Dissipates:
No. 1 - Marietta, Ohio
Silico-Manganese 2% Carbon Grade
July 27 to August 5, 1971. (See recording
strip for actual dates)
See Strip Chart for Particulate Tests and Tapping Data
Sheet
25.5 Net Tons Per Hour
Manganese Ore and FeMn Slag, Coal and Coke,
Gravel and Dolomite, Misc. Remelt Material.
25 - 30,000 - See Strip Chart
800 - 900
360
40
Three Tests Made each at Approximately
57", 47", 37"
From None to a Trace
SS:rb
16
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Sample port locations were installed by plant personnel prior to the
arrival of the test team, and approved by the EPA project officer. There
were five sample ports across the top of the inlet duct to the scrubber.
As shown in Figure 3 the cross section of this duct was divided into four
one-foot layers, thus forming a 20 equal area profile. Particulate tests
were conducted for 3 minutes at the centroid of each area. A pulley-trolley
attachment, located approximately fifteen feet above the duct, provided
vertical access to each sampling point in the duct.
The single sample port at the exhaust stapk was large enough to allow
two sampling trains to be run simultaneously. The stack was eight feet in
diameter at the sample profile and was divided into nine equal areas, as
shown in Figure 4. Because the scaffolding was not long enough, points
1 and 2 could not be reached by the probe.
There were two identical exhaust stacks for the tapping operation and
sample locations were placed on the fourth floor, inside the furnace
building. The stacks were five feet in diameter, and were divided into
five equal areas, as shown in Figure ,.5. Sampling trains rested on
scaffolding about six feet above the floor level.
17
-------
oo
A B CD E
n n n n • • n
i i ITT
2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 33
T . -
4 4 4 4 4
^ ^
A
4'
1
t
-0"
f
SOUTHEAST ^
V
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW OF DUCT,
WHEN FACING THE EXHAUST STACK
FIGURE 3. SCRUBBER INLET DUCT - SAMPLE POINT LOCATIONS
-------
NORTHEAST
vo
CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW
FIGURE 4. SCRUBBER EXHAUST DUCT - SAMPLE POINT LOCATIONS
-------
NORTHEAST
K>
O
o • • • • • •
EAST TOP EXHAUST
WEST TOP EXHAUST
FIGURE 5. TAPPING EXHAUST - SAMPLE POINT LOCATIONS
-------
VI. PROCESS OPERATION
Practically all sampling was carried out while the process was running
normally. However, there were periods of furnace shut-downs or low process
loads. These special conditions were rapidly communicated to the sampling
team by either the EPA project engineer or the testing crew leader, in
order to rapidly interrupt the sampling.
The furnace was down practically all day or. July 28, a short period
in the afternoon of July 29, and shortly before noon on July 31. Particulate
run M1E-2 was conducted during a half-load operation on July 30.
Appendix C tabulates the tapping data and indicates the furnace load
during the sampling periods. There were some fluctuations in the furnace
load during testing, but these were considered to be within normal operating
conditions. Normal operating levels were indicated when the furnace operated
between 25 and 30 megawatts. Tapping was conducted as often as necessary,
depending upon the total power input to the furnace.
21
-------
VII. SAMPLING PROCEDURES
All test procedures were discussed with the Project Officer in
advance. They were essentially the same as those being issued by the
Environmental Protection Agency for source sampling.
Preliminary velocity and temperature readings were obtained in order
to select nozzle sizes for isokinetic sampling. Particulate sampling
was conducted using the EPA train as described in Appendix E-l. The
metals sampling train was essentially the same as the ordinary particulate
train, but it specifically called for a glass-lined probe.
Gas sampling was also conducted in accordance with the proposed
EPA Standard Source Testing Methods. Sulfur dioxide was sampled with
midget impingers using isopropyl alcohol and hydrogen peroxide solutions.
•Combustion gases were sampled in plastic bags for immediate analysis with
an Orsat analyzer.
Particle sizing was performed using the Andersen sampler and the
Brink impactor. Further information and details are included in Appendix J.
Special care was taken,.not only to obtain all samples during normal
••
operating conditions, but for each particulate test to include one tap
cycle. Any deviation from the standard methods was either approved or
recommended by the EPA project engineer at the site.
22
-------
VIII. CLEANUP AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The methods employed for cleanup of the EPA particulate train have
become relatively standardized through testing incinerators for
government approval. Various sections of the sampling train were washed
with acetone and water. The filter was removed carefully and each
portion of the collected particulate matter was placed in separate
containers. All portions were then dried at ambient conditions and the
water was extracted for organic material, as well as being evaporated
to dryness. These procedures are outlined in detail in Appendix E.2.
SO,, samples used simple means of cleanup, using distilled deionized
water as a rinsing medium. The analytical procedure is somewhat more
involved and details are outlined in Appendix E.2. Both cleanup and
analytical procedures were conducted in accordance with approved methods.
23
-------
IX. DISCUSSION
A. RESULTS
&
Scrubber Efficiency
The efficiency of the venturi scrubber was determined under three
/_
conditions. Condition A employed a venturi pressure drop of 57 inches
of water; Condition B, 47 inches HO; Condition C, 37 inches HO.
Condition A, with the greatest pressure drop, was only slightly more
efficient than Condition B, however, the inlet grain loading under the
former condition was the lowest obtained at any time during the survey.
As shown in Table 1 under the Summary of Results, the percent
efficiency at each successive condition was 99.1, 99.1, and 96.3.
Because of the difference in flue gas volume at standard conditions,
for the inlet and exhaust locations, the efficiencies were calculated
on the basis of pounds per hour of total particulate matter.
During the 57" HO pressure drop, extra exhaust samples were
obtained because the inlet duct sampling was plagued with major problems.
Because extra results were available for the exhaust emission under this
condition, some results were not included in the average. Run M1E-3 was
omitted because the plant was not running at full capacity. Runs M1E-1
and MlE-2 were not employed since they were not taken simultaneously with
the inlet samples.
24
-------
Scrubber Emissions
Total particulate concentrations leaving the scrubber exhaust stack
were approximately 0.010 grains per standard cubic foot under normal
operating conditions (A, at 57 inches pressure drop). When the venturi
pressure drop was reduced to 47" HO, the average emission concentration
was 0.016 grains/SCF. At Condition C, with a pressure drop of 37" HO,
there was a noticeable change in the emission concentrations and these
averaged 0.048 grains/SCF. Although the exhaust grain loading concen-
trations gradually increased with the decreased pressure drop across the
venturi, the inlet concentrations neither followed this pattern nor did
they remain constant. Inlet grain loadings, respectively, were 1.25,
2.05 and 1.53 grains per standard cubic foot. Note that Condition A
achieved its efficiency with this low inlet grain loading.
Tapping Emissions
Samples were obtained from the two tapping exhaust stacks simul-
taneously. Although the two systems were parallel, and apparently
identical, the tap hole and ladle being filled were much closer to the
west system. Emissions from the unscrubbed stacks were greater than
*
those from the furnace gases ,that had been scrubbed in the venturi system.
Emissions during the three taps sampled were not uniform either between
exhaust stacks or between one tap and the next.
25
-------
The first simultaneous tests were scheduled, and actually run, during
a period in which no tapping was conducted. Due to some sort of process
malfunction, the normal tap was omitted for that period of time. At the
advice of the EPA project officer the equipment was simply sealed (not
cleaned) and the following tapping cycle was sampled. Since no dust was
emitted there should be little question about the sampling trains being
clean for the second trial. However, the skipped cycle would have created
an unusual condition within the furnace, and this is believed to have
accounted for the unusual results obtained during the "first" tapping
samples. ( '
Emissions from Run WTE-1 were much greater than the comparable East
sample or from any following West sample. Even during the following
sample (WTE-2) the emissions were still apparently above normal. By the
third set of samples emissions were similar in both exhaust ducts. It is
•believed that the third set of samples are more nearly "normal".
Apparently when an unusual amount of fumes are produced the tendency is
for this material to be ventilated through the nearest exhaust system;
but when more normal quantities are produced at the ladle, the fumes have
a chance to become more evenly dispersed, and thereby be emitted more or
less equally from the two exhaust systems.
26
-------
Particulate vs. Total Catch
The ratio of particulate trapped by the impingers, versus the total
catch, was quite different for samples collected at different locations,
or under different operating conditions. With one exception, the inlet
duct samples contained less than 2 percent of the total catch as trapped
by the impingers. These results are similar to those obtained on emissions
from an uncontrolled reactive metals furnace.
The percentage of "condensible" material at the exhaust stack was
considerably greater, and varied with the operation of the scrubber.
With a scrubber pressure drop of 57" HO the condensibles ranged from
one third of the total to greater than 10 percent of the total. At the
47 inch pressure drop the percentage was just slightly over 10 percent,
and at the 37 inch pressure drop, was less than 10 percent soluble matter.
It is believed that the decreasing ratio of condensible material is
due ;to the carry-over of small water droplets from the scrubber system.
The water droplets would contain small amounts of soluble matter, and as
the pressure drop was reduced there would be less tendency for these
droplets to pass through the cyclonic collection chambers.
Fumes from the tapping operation' have reason to be somewhat
different from the average material emitted from the top of the furnace,
but there are some very unusual results in regard to the solubility ratio
observed. Those samples from the east exhaust duct were less than 10
27
-------
percent soluble matter, yet the comparative samples (taken simultaneously)
ranged from 20 to 50 percent soluble matter. In spite of the unusual
process conditions associated with the tapping cycle there appears to be
no logical explanation for the noted difference.
Flue Gas Conditions
Considering the normal variation in operating conditions, and
observing gas flow from the furnace, the flue gas volume was considered
to be relatively stable between equivalent test runs. There was a
noticeable increase in flue gas volume, at the same standard conditions,
between the inlet duct and exhaust stack locations. Although no physical
examination was conducted it seems certain that there are minor points
of air leakage. As the pressure drop was reduced across the venturi
scrubber there was a decre'ase in the flue gas volume. This was not
particularly noticeable at the exhaust stack location and did not become
apparent at the inlet location until the lowest pressure drop was being
evaluated.
Temperatures of the flue gas leaving the exhaust stack were rather
stable during any particular test. There was relatively little variation
during the entire survey, especially in light of the wild temperature
»•
variations which were encountered at the inlet duct. Average temperatures
at the inlet duct were generally, and surprisingly, close together in most
cases. The temperature at any particular moment could range from individual
28
-------
readings between 400°F and 1300°/rduring operation which was considered to
be normal. Temperature changes of several hundred degrees could occur
within the space of 5 or 10 minutes.
/
Gaseous Emissions
With the exception of a single test, sulfur dioxide emissions were
less than 1 percent at all stack exhausts. There was no appreciable
difference between those SO^ concentrations being emitted from the tapping
stacks and those from the exhaust stack. It is doubtful that there was
much scrubbing of sulfur dioxide accomplished by the venturi system.
The .862 run» with its impinger train, corresponding to particulate
test M1E-11, was accidentally dropped from the stack during a rainy
period.
Carbon dioxide content from the tapping exhaust stacks was
essentially negligible. These concentrations were so low, and the
calculation so inaccurate under those conditions, that the percent excess
air actually indicated negative in some instances. Excess air from a
non-combustion process is simply not applicable. Carbon dioxide
concentrations at the scrubber exhaust stack were relatively constant,
although there seemed to be a decrease as the pressure drop across the
unit was decreased. This would imply'"that either there was greater air
leakage, or simply less furnace fumes being collected, as the pressure
drop was reduced.
29
-------
No carbon monoxide (CO) results are available. The infrared analyzer
had been calibrated at the laboratory before the survey was begun, however,
within ten minutes after having started operation in the field it failed
to indicate properly. * After two weeks of repair it was discovered that
a completely new sensing unit was required and the unit was sent out for
a major overhaul.
Particle Sizing
The particle size of material emitted from the exhaust stack is so
small that major differences are hard to determine. The mass median
diameter (MMD) ranged between approximately 0.2 microns and 0.6 microns
in all tests. The MMD of material collected at the inlet duct varied
from about 0.6 microns to 5. microns in diameter.
It must be remembered that the sample time at the inlet duct was
only one or two minutes at a single point. It is quite unlikely that
any single value would represent a true average of the material being
emitted from the furnace. , • • '
Two simultaneously samples were obtained at each of the tapping ducts.
During the first pair of tests the MMD ranged from 1.75 to 2.5 microns.
»•
During the next set of tests the particle size MMD was only 0.8 or 0.9
microns, indicating the variation that could occur between tapping cycles.
Each of these tests was obtained for a duration of 20 minutes and would
therefore be more representative of an average emission.
30
-------
Exhaust samples were obtained during periods ranging from 10 minutes
to 55 minutes. This time period was probably long enough for average
results. However, the average particle size was so extremely small, that
it was difficult to obtain wholly satisfactory results.
All of the above particle size results are explained in more
detail in Appendix J. A graphical representation of each sample is
available in Sub-appendix J-l along with details of the date, operating
condition and time sampled.
Chemical Analyses
Exhaust samples from the scrubber, and exhaust samples from tapping,
were analyzed by microscope, by qualitative electron beam X-ray micro Analysis
and atomic absorption. 'All samples had a problem due to the very small
quantities of material available for analysis. Due to the intermixing of
the glass fiber in the filter with particulate matter imbedded in that
filter, it was not possible to analyze for silicon. All samples obtained
for these chemical analyses were obtained through all-glass pyrex probes.
Details concerning the specific elements and quantities obtained are
found in Appendix J.
31
-------
B. OPERATING CONDITIONS
Venturi Scrubber
i
As far as can be determined there were no problems with the operation
^
of the scrubber during this test survey. Whenever observed, the pressure
drop instruments were holding steady at the proper AP for that series
of tests.
Furnace 1
According to the megawatt chart, as shown in Appendix C, operating
conditions of the furnace were fairly uniform. Furnace power was
normally kept between 25 and 30 megawatts, with little fluctuation
except for periods of down-time. Unfortunately, the periods of down-time,
although low on an overall 24-hour basis, were very disruptive to the test
program. Inlet and exhaust samples No. 2 and 4 were interrupted by
plant shut-down; but where previous sampling had been satisfactory, these
were continued until completion of the sample after restarting the furnace.
There ^rere several other periods in which sampling was delayed due to
process shut-down. Every particulate sample was timed into the ordinary
operating schedule, in order to include one tapping cycle during the
middle of the sample period.
32
-------
C. TEST CONDITIONS
Inlet Duct
There was no other feasible location for sampling the inlet duct,
but this was a very poor location in nearly every respect. The duct work
was obstructed by a series of I-beams about four feet above the top of
the duct. There was little or no straight flow of gases prior to the
sample point and very little straight flow following the sample location.
The horizontal duct led to immediate stratification of the heavy particles,
and created a very difficult sampling situation with the EPA train in the
vertical position. In addition the location was dangerously hot, very
dusty, and poorly lighted.
Due to a misunderstanding, between the presurvey date and the time
of the test survey, many weeks later, the trolley rail was mounted too
low for satisfactory handling of the EPA train. A bad pulley simply
added to the problems, along with the tendency for filters to become
clogged within minutes. Nearly four days were eventually required,
including furnace down-time, before all equipment had been properly
situated and the above problems had been solved. Meanwhile an ASME
type alundum thimble was tried without success, along with other
suggestions. . *
Until the trolley line was lifted to its proper position, a new
pulley with multiple leverage was purchased, and a smaller size nozzle
33
-------
C. TEST CONDITIONS
Inlet Duct
There was no other feasible location for sampling the inlet duct,
but this was a very poor location in nearly every respect. The duct work
was obstructed by a series of I-beams about four feet above the top of
the duct. There was little or no straight flow of gases prior to the
sample point and very little straight flow following the sample location.
The horizontal duct led to immediate stratification of the heavy particles,
and created a very difficult sampling situation with the EPA train in the
vertical position. In addition the location was dangerously hot, very
dusty, and poorly lighted.
Due to a misunderstanding, between the presurvey date and the time
of the test survey, many weeks later, the trolley rail was mounted too
low for satisfactory handling of the EPA train. A bad pulley simply
added to the problems, along with the tendency for filters to become
clogged within minutes. Nearly four days were eventually required,
including furnace down-time, before all equipment had been properly
situated and the above problems had been solved. Meanwhile an ASME
type alundum thimble was tried without success, along with other
suggestions.
*• '
Until the trolley line was lifted to its proper position, a new
pulley with multiple leverage was purchased, and a smaller size nozzle
33
-------
was employed for the EPA train, no satisfactory samples were obtained.
After the above corrections were completed, two inlet tests were conducted
each day according to schedule, in spite of several plant operating
delays.
Outlet Duct
The vertical exhaust stack, with long straight flow before and after
the sampling location, should have provided good representative sampling.
1 • I
A newly constructed, temporary platform was satisfactory except that it
was about one foot short, and therefore the first two positions inside
the stack could not be reached with the long ten foot probe. The No. 3
position was sampled longer to represent the missed area. There was a
problem in that only a single port was available for sampling, and this
port was required for particulate samples, for metals samples, and for
S0_ sampling, as well as for particle size sampling. Only two probes
would fit into the hole.
The platform was covered but there were several days of rain during
the test survey, and there was a severe problem with electrical shocks
and safety on this platform. A telephone system connected the exhaust
stack location to the inlet location so that there were no problems of
«• .
communication whenever troubles arose.
34
-------
Tapping Stacks
Both tapping exhaust locations had excellent platforms located
inside the building where rain was not a problem. The fine particles,
and vertical flow, increased the possibility of representative sampling.
Only a single hole was available at each stack but, because there were
two parallel systems, the SO. sample could be obtained from one stack
while the metals sample was obtained from the opposite stack.
Power Problems
Individual circuits were not available for testing equipment at
this plant location. At the inlet duct there were power problems only
on the first day or two when many simultaneous samples for particulate
and particle size, etc., were combined. Subsequent to that time, all
particle sizing was conducted when particulate matter samples were
completed. No metals or gaseous samples were collected from that
• location.
The exhaust location had particulate, sulfur dioxide, metals and
carbon dioxide sampling, to be conducted simultaneously and offered
almost continuous problems. It was impossible to continue tests with
the original power source, therefore, a second line was provided.
However, at various times throughout the survey there were electrical
failures that would delay sampling, especially during the rainy periods.
There was a severe electrical safety problem during these rainy periods.
35
-------
Filter Plugging '
As was experienced during some samples at the Foote Mineral Company,
in Steubenville, Ohio, there was a severe problem of plugging and vacuum
buildup in the sample train because of the accumulation of fine
particulate matter on the glass fiber filters. (Larger, four inch
filter holders were ordered but were not available at this time).
Although several solutions were suggested, the ultimate cure for the
problem was to employ a small size nozzle ( 3/16 inch ) so that less
overall sample was obtained. Additional filter holders were prepared
in advance, and these were changed whenever the pressure drop became too
great for the maintenance of isokinetic conditions. By having pre-prepared
filters, and placing them in the heated box for warmup, it was possible to
continue sampling rapidly enough so that each test was completed before
another tapping cycle would have forced shut-down of the train.
Particle Sizing
;; Analyses for the distribution of particle size were conducted with
the Brink Cascade Impactor. These tests were conducted at both inlet
and exhaust locations, as well as at both tapping exhausts. There were
many delays due to the lack of sufficient power, and-due to the lack of
sufficient sample ports for simultaneous sampling with other tests. As
discussed in Appendix J, there were problems of high temperature at the
inlet duct and problems of high moisture content at the exhaust stack.
The need for high temperature heating tapes at the exhaust stack simply
increased problems of power failure and made it absolutely impossible for
simultaneous tests to be conducted.
36
-------
Tapping Samples
Appendix D includes raw data for samples ETE-lA and WTE-lA. These
samples correspond to the expected particulate samples at both east and
west tapping exhausts. As previously mentioned these were false runs
because there was no tapping, as had been expected.
Each particulate test at the west tapping exhaust was accompanied
with an Orsat analysis. Due to the rush, and short periods of tapping,
no analyses were performed for the east exhaust. The west results were
certainly satisfactory for any calculation of gas density, and as has
been discussed, the Orsat results indicate that all analyses were
unnecessary.
Miscellaneous Problems
Sulfur dioxide and metals runs were conducted only at the exhaust
stack. These were obtained simultaneously with each particulate test,
: but they alternated with each other because of the lack of platform
space and sample port size. Samples were alternated such that there was
one SO. and one metals test conducted under each scrubber condition.
The metals test corresponding to particulate test M1E-12 was repeated,
after the filter was ruined by condensed moisture. Apparently the heated
I-
probe was not in operation and this allowed condensation to reach the
filter.
37
-------
Inlet samples MlD-1, -2, -3, were unsatisfactory due to the previously
mentioned sampling problems. Samples for scrubber Condition A (57" H.O)
were begun with the inlet duct on sample No. 4. However, additional
samples had already been satisfactorily obtained at the exhaust location.
Sample M1E-6 from the exhaust stack, however, had to be discarded after
there was an electrical short and rheostat failure in the middle of that
run. With other satisfactory samples available, it was not considered
necessary to repeat this test.
No preliminary moisture sample was conducted at the inlet duct
after the sample train was destroyed due to unusually high heat on the
duct. An estimate of only one or two percent was employed but results
indicated that a greater moisture content was normally present. The
measured moisture contents were greater than would be expected under
the operating conditions of a furnace, but they were repeated in several
successive samples. It is possible that part of this moisture was
generated by the water leaks which were prevalent around the furnace,
and also, both in and around the exhaust duct.
38
-------
APPENDIX
39
-------
APPENDIX B
COMPLETE GASEOUS RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
SO-EMISSION DATA
Run No. ' • '
Date - -..'...
mg S09 . _ „...'.'. ..
j ^ ~ .
T - Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
Pv - .Barometric Pressure, "Hg abs.
V - Volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
m conditions, ft.-*
• ppm_S02 ' .
l-E
7/27/71
0:31
75
29.5
31.64
0.158
2-E
7/29/71
2.5
68
29,5
6.98
5.21
3-E
7/3C/71
o
66
29.5
10:38
0
4-E
7/31/11
0.19
77
29.5
11.00
0.266
5-E
7/31/71
0.19
88
29.5
9.62
0.302
Vacuum
- 5.0
2.9
3.4 3.7- 3.0
Vstd - Volume of sampled gas converted ' • • t. •" ."
.. to standard conditions .25:7 6.21 9.14 9.36 8.24
Not used because the meter was
"under vacuum.
l-E-
l-E
Vstd -
. ppm S02
fO'31)(13.1)
v 25)7
0.158
25.7
B-l
-------
Run No. ' . • '
Date
dig SOo _ . ... ..... .' ....
T - Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
IV - .Barometric Pressure, "Hg abs.
V - Volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
m conditions, ft.3
• ppm SOg " . ... .
8-E
8/2
0. 28
79
29.7
6.97
).587
9-E
8/2
0.06"
81
29.7
24.70
0.0340
10 -E
8/3
0.19
68
29.6
3.69
0.737
•
•
Vacuum
.2.4
1.2 2.3
Vstd - Volume'of sampled gas converted
.to standard condition's
6V25 23.1
3.38
":: : - 0.7332 X mg S02 X (Tm + 460)
ppm S0? = '•
*- . * ** • " .•
B-2
-------
SO •EMISSION DATA
Run No. " •'•.-.
Date - . (197i)
mg SO, . .
y c. '
T - Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
m
PV- .Barometric Pressure, "Hg abs.
V - Volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
m conditions, ft.^
' Ppm SO 2
WTE-l
8/5
Qpt90
75
29.6-
3.95
0703
WTE-2
8/5
0 000
79
29 ..6
2.45
0.361
ETE-3
8/5
)060
75
29.6
l.t)
0.833
*
Vacuum
2.5
2.5 . 1.1
_ Volume of.dry gas converted
to standard conditions
3.54 2.1.8 0.944
>: -; • ' . 0.7332 X mg SO, X (T + 460)
. „*. . c. . m
fjpm S02 = : ;
- ..,,-V XVm
B-3
-------
ORSAT RESULTS
Test Number
M1E- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-10
-11
-12
WTE- 1
- 2
- 3
Date
7/27/71
7/29/71
7/30/71
7/31/71
7/31/71
Discarded
8/1/71
8/2/71
8/2/71
8/3/71
8/3/71
8/4/71
8/5/71
8/5/71
8/5/71
7» C02
2.1
3.4
1.9
2.8
3.3
-
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.2
3,1 ,
0.2
0.1
0.1
7, 02
19.2
18.3
18.6
18.8
18.4
'
18.6
18.6
18.5
18.8
18.6
18.7
21.2
20.9
21.2
7. CO
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
B-4
-------
APPENDIX A
COMPLETE PARTICULATE RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER EXHAUST
• Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7. Water Vapor - % Vol.
% CO 2 - Vol % dry
% 07 - Vol % dry
* IS
7» Excess air (? sampling point
S(?2 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF (? Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (7, of Total")
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF (§ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature
M1E-1
7/27/71
113,000
18.5
2.1
19.2
1110
0.158
-
0.0103
0.00728
9.97
38.
0.0166
0.0117
«'
16.1
140
**
M1E-2
7/29/71
112,200
15. A
3.4
18.3
723
5.21
-
0.00710
0.00520
6.83
3S.
0.0110
0.00805
10.5
140
M1E-3
7/30/71
122,100
12.9
1.9
18.6
729
0
-
0.0107
O.t0839
11.2
n .
0.0122
0.00956
12.8
118
M1E-4
7/31/71
116,800
15.8
2.8
18.8
917
0.266
-
0.00813
0.00594
8.14
ifi.
0.00967
0.00706
9.68
139
M1E-5
7/31/71
110,200
17.2
3.3
18 i 4
757
0.302
-
0.00889
0.00684
8.39
15.
0.0105
0.00807
9.91
140
M1E-6
-
-
-
-
-
"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
** Plant running at approximate one half-load.
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
A-l
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER EXHAUST (CONTINUED)
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7. Water Vapor - 7. Vol.
% C02 - Vol 7, dry
7. 09 - Vol 7» dry
^ A,
7o Excess air (? sampling point
S0« Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (% of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature
M1E-7
8/1/71
118,100
16.1
3.0
18.6
827
-
• -
0.0150
0.0111
15.2
12.
0.0170
0.0126
17.2 .
135
M1E-8
8/2/71
115,000
18.2
3.2
18.6
845
0.587
-
0.0180
0.0132
17.7
9.
0.0197
0.'0144
19.4
127
M1E-9
8/2/71
121,100
15.3
3.4
18.5
815
0.0340
-
0.0114
O.t)0831
11.8
13.
0.0131
0.00955
13.6
134
M1E-10
8/3/71
114,300
17.6
3.2
18.8
964
0.737
-
0.0138
0.0100
13.5
4.
0.0144
0.0104
14.1
130
M1E-11
8/3/71
112,000
16.7
3.2
18.6
845
-
-
0.0369
0.0270
35.4
17.'
0.0445
0.0326
42.7
133
M1E-12.J
8/4/71
103, 20C
17.6
3.1
18.7
890
-
-
0.0798
0.0576
70.6
6.
0.0849
0.0613
75.1
132
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
A-2
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGE
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test. No.
No. Runs 11
Name of Firm
Union Cartide
.Location Of Plant Marietta, Ohio
Type"Of Plant - Ferro Alloy
Control Equipment Scrubber -. Venturi"'-.Type-
Sampling Point Locations Scrubber Exhaust Stack
Pollutants Sampled .Participate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. MlE-l
Run No. M1E~2 '
Date 7/27/71
Begin
Date 7/29/71
Begin
1035
End 2112
End
Run No. MiE-3
Date 7/30/71
Begin 1815
M1E-4
M1E-5
. .7/31/71.
7/31/71
1034
1545
' End 1940
. 1252
- 1713
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No. .. •
p barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
p orifice pressure drop, "H,,0
f? . *•
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
m conditions, ft. 3
T Average Gas Meter Tempera tare, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @ Standard
mstd. Conditions, ft. 3
V Total H?0 collected, ml., Impingers
w & Silical Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
Wgas ft. 3 @ Standard Conditions*
MlE-l
29,5
2.03
58.61
84
56.6
269.
12.8_.
M1E-2
29.5
2.03
63.60
84
61.4 •
234.
11..1.:
MIE-3
29.5
2.20
64.09
92
61.10
190.9
9\05
i .
M1E-4
29.5
2.04
74.15
95
70.10
276.5
13.1
M1E-5
29.5 "
2.05
70.31
106
65.15
285.
13.5. •
'
M1E
,_ • *
1
i - •
* "Discarded
* * 70°F, 29.92" Hg. - •=-•--•
A-3
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test. No.
Name of Firm
""•'-- : .'•::. . No. Runs
1 ' ' " . *
Location of Plant • '
Type" of Plant
Control Equipment
Sampling Point Locations
Pollutants Sampled -
Time of Parti cul ate Test:
Run No. MiE-7
Run No. M1E'8 '
Run No.MiE-9
•M1E-10
V • •-•MlE-il ..-" '••'.' .
M1E-12 " i -.
. •• • • • *
"'. — - -^ ' "*
*
"• '
Date 8/1/71 Begin "1540 .. • End 1655
Date '8/2/71 ' Begin °945 End ins
Date 8/2/71 Begin 1805 • End 2000
8/3/71 1010 • - 1140
. • ' .8/3/71 - 1400 ,•';. 1530
. 8/4/71 " • • 1115 . 1245
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No. . •
P. barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
b
p orifice pressure drop, "H90
rt ' £
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft. 3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @ Standard
std. Conditions, ft. 3
V Total KLO collected, ml., Impingers
w & Silical Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
wgas ft. 3 @ Standard Conditions*
M1E-7
29.7
2.19
68.99
110
64.0
259 . 2
12.3-
M1E-8
29.7
2.02
67.96
107
63.40
298.2
14.i'-'
M1E-9
29.7
2.01
70.95
106
66.25
253. -2
12.0
M1E-10
29.6
2.10
68.72
91
65.75
!95.4
14.0
M1E-1J
29.6 '
2.0
67.79
99
63.60
260.7
12.7
M1E-1
29.'5
1.7
62. 3S
90
59. 3C
268.2
1
;12.7
1
• * 70 F, 29.92" Hg. - —
A-4
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M-7, Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
7. 02
7. N2
M W
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
%M -7. Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
7o 02
7. N2
M Wd - Molecular weight of dry
stack gas
M W - Molecular weight of stack gas
APs - Velocity Head of stack gas,
In.H20
Ts - Stack Temperature, °F
&PS X(TS + 460)
Ps - Stack Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Vs - Stack Velocity @ stack
conditions, fpm
o
As - Stack Area, in.
Qs -. Stack Gas Volume @
Standard Conditions, *SCFM
Tt - Net Time of Test, min.
Dn - Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
7ol - Percent isokinetic
mf - Particulate - probe, cyclone
and filter, mg.
mt - Particulate - total, mg
Can - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter, gr/SCF
Cao - Particulate - total, gr/SCF
Cat - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter,
gr/cf @ stack conditions
M1E-7
16.1
0.8"39
3.0
18.6
78.4
29.22
27.45
0.73
135
20.8
29.6
3180.
7235.
118,100
90
0.25
95%
62.4
70.9
0.0150
0.0170
0.0111
M1E-8
18.2
0.818
3.2
18.6
78.2
29.29
27.23
0.72
127
20.55
29.6
3140.
7235.
115,000
90
0.25
96.
74.3
81.3
0.0180
0.0197
0.0132
M1E-9
15.3
0.847
3.4
18.5
78.1
29.32
27.56
0.76
134
21.2
29.6
3230.
7235.
121,100
90
0.25
95.
49.2
56.2
0.0114
0.0131
0.00831
M1E-10
17.6
0.824
3.2
18.8
78.0
29.23
27.22
0.71
130
20.42
29.49
3120.
7235.
114,300
90
0.25
98.
58.8
61.6
0.0138
0.0144
0.0100
M1E-11
16.7
0.833
3.2
18.6
78.2
29.26
27.43
0.67
133
19.9
29.47
3040.
7235.
112,000
90
0.25
99.
152.4
184.1
0.0369
0.0445
0.0270
M1E-12 '
17.6
0.824
3.1
18.7
78.2
29.14.
27.17
0.58
132
18.5
29.38
2845.
7235.
103,200
90
0.25
99.
307.0
326.9
3.0798
3.0849
0.0576
A-6
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No. ' ' ...
C -Particulate, total, gr/cf
a G> stack cond. ' '
C . - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr. •
ax
% EA - % Excess air G>
oump 1 1 iiy pu i ii u ,,„,,..,
M1E-1
0.0117
9.97
L6.1
L110.
M1E-2
D. 00805
6.83
10.5
723 1 .
M1E-3
3II5956
11.2
12.8
729_.
M1E-4
a00706
8.14
9.68
917.
WE -5
O.G0607
8.39
9.91
757. _.
M1E-6
70°F. 29.92" Hg.
A-7
-------
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No. ' ' *
C - Parti cul ate, total, gr/cf . '••/_
@ stack cond.
C . - Parti cul ate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C v - Parti cul ate - total, Ib/hr. • •
3X
% EA"- % Excess air @
buiup i i ny pj i ii u .
M1E-7
).0126
15,2
17.2
827.
M1E-8
aoiAi
17.7
19.4
845.
M1E-9
0.00955
11.8
13.6
815.
41E-10
0.0104
13.5
14.1
964.
MlE-11
).0326
35.4
42.7
845.
MLE-12
0.0613
70.6
75.1
890
70°F. 29.92" Hg.
A-8
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER INLET
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
7, 09 - Vol 7. dry
* A,
7o Excess air (? sampling point
S0? Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - SCRUBBER INLET (CONTINUED)
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - 7. Vol.
7. C02 - Vol % dry
7. 0, - Vol 7» dry
^ *
% Excess air (? sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
ibs./hr.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (7. of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature
MID- 10
8/3/71
91,000
4.61
N/A
n
ii
0.965
0.431
752.6
1.7
0.982
0.438
765.9
655
MID-11
8/3/71
85,000
8.9
N/A
n
n
1.66
0.709
1209.
1.8
1.69
0.722
1231.
654
MID-12
8/4/71
94,900
4.8
N/A
ti
M
1.91
0.948
1553.
0.5
1.92
0.953
1562.
541
..
•
.
* 70°F, 29,92" Hg
A-10
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test. No.
No. Runs
Name of Firm
Union Carbide
. Location Of Plant Marietta,' Ohio
Type "of Plant -
Ferro Alloy
Control Equipment Scrubber
Sampling Point Locations inlet duct to scrubber
Pollutants Sampled -Particulate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. MiD-4 Date 7/31/71
Begin ib'ao •
End 1257
Run No.
Run No.
• •—
MID- 5 '
MID- 6 '
•MID- 7
MID-8 ' .
' MID- 9 ' - ;
Date
Date
".
7/31/71
8/1/71
.8/1/71
8/2/71
8/2/71
Begin
Begin
1500
1100
1525
0945
1810
End
• End
.••"-•
1626
1247
1700
.1115
1929
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No.
p. barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
p orifice pressure drop, "H90
is *•
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft. 3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature^ °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @ Standard
std. conditions, ft. 3
V Total HpO collected, ml., Impingers
w & Silica! Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
Wgas ft. 3 @ Standard Conditions*
MID-4
29.5
0.40
21.66
90
20.6
22.2
1.05--
MID-5
29.5
0.31
1-9.72
90
18.7 •
25.5
1.21 *
MID-6
29.5
0.42
21.54
90
20.4
25.7
1.22
MID-7
29.7
0.41
20.02
98
18.9
22.5
1.06
MID-8
29.7 "
0.38
20.05
94
19.05
24.6
MID-9
29 ."7
.•
0.37
20.96
94
19.85
25.2
1.16 :1.19
I
' * 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-ll
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
Test. No.
Name of Firm
Location of Plant_
Type"of Plant •
Control Equipment_
Sampling Point Locations_
Pollutants Sampled -
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
No. Runs
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. MID-10 Date 8/3/71
Run No. MID-11 Date 8/3/71
Run No. M1D-12 Date 8/4/71
Begin 1006'
Begin_
1400
Begin
1048
End 1122
End 1527
' End
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No.
p. barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
b
p orifice pressure drop, "H?0
"? *-
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
111 conditions, ft. 3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @ Standard
std. Conditions, ft. 3
V Total H?0 collected, ml., Impingers
w & Silica! Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
wgas ft. 3 (3 Standard Conditions*
MID-10
29.6
0.31
20.65
91
19.65
20.0
0.95
MID- 11
29.6
0/27
17.93
92
17.0-
34.9
1.66 .
MID-12
29.5
0.31
18.02
86
17.23
18.6
0.87
-
"„•
1
' * 70°F, 29.92" Hg. - -----
A-12
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M -7« Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
7. 02
7. N2
M W<| - Molecular weight of dry
stack gas
M W - Molecular weight of stack gas
A Ps - Velocity Head of stack gas,
In.H20
Ts - Stack Temperature, °F
&PS X(TS + 460)
Ps - Stack Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Vs - Stack Velocity @ stack
conditions, fpm
0
As - Stack Area, in.
Qs - Stack Gas Volume @
Standard Conditions, *SCFM
Tt - Net Time of Test, min.
Dn - Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
%I - Percent isokinetic
mf - Particulate - probe, cyclone
and filter, mg.
mt ~ Particulate - total, mg
Can - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter, gr/SCF
cao ~ Particulate - total, gr/SCF
Ca(- - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter,
gr/cf @ stack conditions
MID-4
4.85
0.952
-
-
-
29.14
28.36
0.53
599
23.62
29.42
3580
8976
104,500
60
0.187
112 "
1404.4
1416.3
1.05
1.06
0.491
MID-5
6.07
0.939
-
-
-
29.23
28.50
0.50
674
23.79
29.42
3590
8976
96,500
60
0.187
110
514.6
563.3
0.423
0.464
0.182
MID- 6
5.63
0.944
-
-
-
29.18
28.71
0.50
607
23.1
29.42
3500
8976
100,800
60
0.187
115
2942.6
2954.9 .
2.22
2.23
1.02
MID-7
5.30
0.947
-
-
-
29.22
28.65
0.58
631
25.15
29.42
3460
8976
97,900
60
0.187
112
2362.4
2394.4
1.92
1.95
0.866
MID- 8
5.74
0.942
-
-
-
29.26
28.63
0.55
633
24.6
29.42
3700
8976
103,200
60
0.187
95
2597.6
2628.9
2.10
2.12
0.942
MID-9
5.65
0.944
-
-
-
29.24
28.61
0.56
629
24.7
29.42
3710
8976
104,600
60
0.187
108
2654.9
2667.9
2.06
2.07
0.930
A-13
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M-% Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
% C02
7. 02
7. N2
M Wd - Molecular weight of dry
stack gas
M W - Molecular weight of stack gas
APs - Velocity Head of stack gas,
In.H20
Ts - Stack Temperature, °F
&PS X(TS + 460)
Ps - Stack Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Vs - Stack Velocity @ stack
conditions, fpm
2
As - Stack Area, in.
Qs - Stack Gas Volume @
. Standard Conditions, *SCFM
Tt - Net Time of Test, min.
Dn - Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
%I - Percent isokinetic
mf - Particulate - probe, cyclone
and filter, mg.
Bit - Particulate - total, mg
Can - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter, gr/SCF
Cao - Particulate - total, gr/SCF
Cat - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter,
gr/cf (3 stack conditions
MID-10
4.61
0.954
-
.
-
29.23
28.73
0.43
655
21.9
29.50
3260
8976
91,000
60
0.187
122
1231.0
1252.5
0.965
0.982
0.431
MID- 11
8.9
0.911
-
-
-
29.18
28.18
0.40
654
21.1
29.51
3180
8976
85,000
60
0.187
114
1836.2
1862.8
1.66
1.69
0.709
MID-12
4.8
0.952
-
-
-
29.18
28.61
0.42
541
20.5
29.5
3060
8976
94,900
60
0.187
103
2141.7
2149.6
1.91
1.92
0.948
A-14
-------
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
A
Run No. ' •' .
C - Parti cu-lete, total, gr/cf
@ stack cond. ' • ."
Ca - Parti cul ate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C v - Parti cul ate - total, Ib/hr.
ax
% EA"- % Excess air 6» -
scuip liny point
MID-4
0.496
940:4
949.3
N7A
MID-5
0.200
349.8
383.7
H/A .
MLD-6
LT02
1918.
1926.
N/A_-.
MID-7
0.879
1611.
1636.
.N/A:.
MID-8
»
0.951
1857.
1875.
N/A_..
11D-9
0.934.
1846.
1856.
15_/A
70°F. 29.92" Hg.
A-15
-------
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA (cont'ci)
Run lio. • "' -* .
C - Participate, total, gr/cf
a @ stack cond.
C - Parti cul ate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C „ - Parti cul ate - total, Ib/hr. •
ax
% EA - 2 Excess air @
ouinp iinypjiiiu
MID- 1C
0.438
752.6
765.9
N/A
MID-11
0.722
1209.
1231.
N/A.
MID-12
3 ."953
1553.
1562.
N/A,.
»
- ---
.
70°F. 29.92" Hg.
A-16
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS - TAPPING EXHAUST
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - 7. Vol.
% CO 2 - Vol 7, dry
7. 0, - Vol 7. dry
z *,
7» Excess air @ sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from Impinger
Train (7. of Total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature
ETE-1
8/5/71
70,100
4.95
-
-
N/A
-
-
X0358
0.0316
21.5
2.
0.0366
t.
0.0323
22.0
107
ETE-2
8/5/71
70,000
A. 12
-
-
N/A
-
-
X0249
0.0224
14.94
10.
0.0275
0'.0248
16.5
100
ETE-3
8/5/71
69,700
3.74
-
-
N/A
0-833
-
0.0284
0/0258
16.96
8.
0.031
WTE-1
8/5/71
64,250
3.11
0.2
21.2
N/A
D.703
-
0.128
0.114
70.5
20.
0.160
0.0282 0.1429
18.5
97
88.2
111
WTE-.2
8/5/71
61,800
3.32
0.1
20.9
N/A
0361
-
0.0483
0.0428
25.6
30.
0.0696
0.0616
36.9
115
FTE-3
8/5/71
64,700
2.72
0.1
21.2
N/A
-
-
0.0169
0.0153
9.37
48.
0.0329
0.0297
18.25
107
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
A-17
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test. No.
No. Runs
Name of Firm
Union Carbide
Location Of Plant_ Marietta^ Ohio
Type "of Plant •_
Ferro Alloy - Reactive Metals
Control Equipment Scrubber
Sampling Point Locations East and West Tapping Exhausts
»
Pollutants Sampled - ^articulate. S02
Time of Particulate Test: . .- ''• ".
Run No. ETE-I WTE-I Date 8/5/71 8/5/71 Begin 113'6 • 113.0.
•End 1207 1207
Run No. ETE-2 WTE-2 Date 8/5/71 8/5/71 Begin 1^30 1430 EnjlSOl 1500
Run No. ETE-3 WTE-3 Date 8/5/71 8/5/71 Begin 1602 1604 • Endi632 1634
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No. . -
p barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
p orifice pressure drop, "H90
^, rt .- *-
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft. 3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @ Standard
std. Conditions, ft. 3
V Total H?0 collected, ml., Impingers
w & Silical Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
wgas ft. 3 @ Standard Conditions*
ETE-l
29.7
1.76
30.19
104
28.22
31.0
1.47-
ETE-2
29.7
1.76
22.65
96
21.48
19.5
0 . 924
_
ETE-3
29.7
1.74
21.89
97
20.74
17.0
0.806
WTE-1
29.7
1.34
22.77
106
21.22
14.4
0.682
WTE-2
29.7 '
1.26
17.91
97
16.96
12.3
0.583
WTE-3
29'.J
1.33
t
18.63
1
101
1
I
17.52
10.4
0.493
_J
' * 70 F, 29.92" Hg. - ----
A-18
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M -7» Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
% C02
% 02
% N2
M W,j - Molecular weight of dry
stack gas
M W - Molecular weight of stack gas
APs - Velocity Head of stack gas,
In.H20
Ts - Stack Temperature, °F
&PS X(TS + 460)
Ps - Stack Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Vs - Stack Velocity @ stack
conditions, fpm
o
As - Stack Area, in.
Qs - .Stack Gas Volume @
Standard Conditions, *SCFM
Tt ~ Net Time of Test, min.
Dn - Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
%I - Percent isokinetic
mf - Particulate - probe, cyclone
and filter, mg.
mt ~ Particulate - total, mg
Can - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter, gr/SCF
Cao - Particulate - total, gr/SCF
Cat - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter,
gr/cf @ stack conditions
ETE-1
4.95
0.950
-
-
_
28.9
28.34
1.28
107
27.0
29.7
4052
2826
70,100
37
0.187
119
65.6
67.2
0.0358
0.0366
0.0316
ETE-2
4.12
0.959
-
-
-
28.85
28.41
1.24
100
26.4
29.7
3962
2826
70,000
31
0.187
106
34.7
38.4
0.0249
0.0275
0.0224
ETE-3
3.74
0.963
-
-
-
28.86
28.46
1.22
97
26.1
29.7
3905
2826
69,700
30
0.187
107
38.2
41.8
0.0284
0.031
1
0.0258
WTE-1
3.11
0.969
0.2
21.0
78.8
28.88
28.54
1.05
111
24.5
29.7
3666
2826
64,250
37
0.187
97.7
176.9
220.5
0.128
0.160
0.114
WTE-2
3.32
0.967
0.1
20.8
79.1
28.85
28.49
0.98
115
23.8
29.7
3561
2826
61,800
30
0.187
98.3
53.2
76.7
0.0483
0.0696
0.0428
WTE-3
2.72
0.973
0.1
21.1
78.8
28.86
28.57
1.05
107
24.4
29.7
3650
2826
64,700
30
0.187
98.6
19.2
37.4
0.0169
0.0329
0.0153
A-19
-------
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run Mo. • ' * ' -
C - Parti cul ate, total, gr/cf
aj @ stack cond. '
C ' - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr. x .
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr. •
a*
% EA - % Excess air @ .
SGiTipi ing point
ETE-1
0.0323
21. -5
22.0
N/A .
ETE-2
X0248
14.94
16.5
•N/A..
•TE-3
0.0282
16.. 96
18.5
M/A..
WTE-1
0.1429
70.5
88.2
JN./-A..
WTE-2
t
0.0616
25.6
36.9
N/A
JTE-3
3.0297
9.37
18.25
&/A
70°F. 29.92" Hg.
A-20
-------
EXAMPLE PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
ETE-1 •
1. Volume_of dry gas sarapied at standard conditions - 70°F, 29.92"
Hg, ftJ.
X V /P_ + P \
m I B m )
\ I1.fi/
17.7
m I K. m I
V = __ N 13.6 / - Ft.
mstd (T + 460)"
sn
1.76
(17.7)(30.19)(29.7 + 13.6 ")
564
28.22
2. Volume of water vapor at 70°F and 29.92" Hg, Ft.3
V = 0.0474 X V = ft.3
w w
gas
=(0.0474)(31.0)
= 1.47
3. % moisture in stack gas
100 X V
«
" 7.
V + V
m ,_, w
std gas
(100)(1.47)
28.22 + 1.47
4.95
A-21
-------
4. Mole fraction of dry gas
100 - %M
100
100 - 4.95
100
= 0.950
5. Average molecular weight of dry stack gas
M
d = (%C°2
) = 28.9
For this calculation, data from WTE-1 was used, as an
Orsat analysis was not taken for ETE-1.
6. Molecular weight of stack gas
M W = M W , X M, + 18 (1 - Mj
ad d
= (28.9)( .950) + 18(1 - .950)
« 28.34
7. Stack velocity @ stack conditions, fpm
V = 4350 XVAP X (T •-+ 460)
s s s '
(4350)(27
4052
.0) 1 (29.7)(28.
34)
P X M W
s
1/2
1/2
= fpm
A-22
-------
8. Stack gas volume @ standard conditions, SCFK
0.123 X Vs X As X Md X P&
Qs * (T + 460)
s
(0.123)(4052)(2826)(0.950)(29.7)
567
- 70,100
9. Percent isokinetic
1032 X (T + 460) XV
•J-r SL
V XT X P X M, X (D
. s t s d ^ n
(1032)(567)(30.19)
= (4052)(37)(29.7)(.950)(0.035l)
t
= 119
10. Particulate - probe, cyclone, and filter, gr/SCF
Mf
C =0.0154 X = gr/scf
an V
mstd
_ (0.0154)(65.6)
28.22
= 0.0358
11. Particulate total, gr/SCF
Mt
C » 0.0154 X ,.= gr/SCF
flO V
mstd
(0.0154)(67.2) '
28.22 ^
= 0.0366
A-23
-------
12. Particulate - probe, cyclone and filter,
gr/CF at stack conditions
17.7 X C X P X M,
c K an s d _ a-/rp
Cat
-------
16. 7» excess air at sampling point
100 X % 0
(0.266 X %
(100X19.2)
(0.266)(78.7) - 19.2
1110
this calculation, data from M1E-1 was used as % Excess
air at sampling point is not applicable for the tapping
exhausts. • .
A-25
-------
APPENDIX C
COMPLETE OPERATION RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
TAP DATA - NO, 1 FURNACE - MARIETTA, OHIO
p
N
i
*>
•*
".
5
6
7
f,
D
a
0
i
A .
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
:3
4
>
•6
;7
;8
!9
'0
a
'2
•3
14
15
•6
'7
»3
'9
•0
• 1
'2
•3
i4
15
•6
Shift
8/4
8/4
fi/4
S/4
8/4
8/4
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
D;itc
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/27
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/28
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/29
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
Time
8:50
10:15
11:45
1:10
2:45
3:55
5:30
6:55
8:25
9:45
11:10
12:35
2:10
3:40
5:15
6:45
4:00
5:30
7:10
8:35
10:05
ll- 30
1:00
2:25
3:55
5:15
6:45 .
8:10
9:30
11:10
12:50
2:10
4:30
6:00
7:30
8:50
10:20
3:00
5:45
7:25
5:00
7:25
9:15
10:40
12:20
1:40
Tap
No.
207
208
207
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
Shi Ct
8/4
ft/12
4/12
ft/12
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
ft/12
ft/12
4/12
4/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
4/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
8/4
8/4
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
4/12
12/8
12/8.
12/8
•12/8
12/8
Date
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/30
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/1
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
Time
3:15
4:50
6:20
7:45
9:20
10:45
1:00
2:20
3:50
5:20
7:00
8:25
10:00
11:25
1:25
2:20
5:00
. 7:10
10:50
11:35
1:05
2:35
4:10
5:45
7:05
9:05
10:35
1:10
3:10
4:40
6:10
7:40
9:10
11:00
5:35
7:05
8:40
10:05
11:40
1:10
2:40
4:10
5:45
7:10
Tap
No.
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
'288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
Shift
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
• 8/4
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
ft/12
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
12/8
n.ito
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/5
8/6
8/6
8/6
8/6
8/6
Time
8:45
10:15
11:45
1:20
2:55
4:30
6:00
7:25
11:00
12:35
2:15
3:25
5:15
6:40
8:15
9:35
11:30
1:00
2:45
4:45
6:35
8:05
9:50
11:20
1:00
2:25
4:05
5:4.0
7:15
8:40
10:00
11:34
1:10
2:30
3:55
5:15
7:10
8:55
10:05
11:30
1:30
3:10
4:40
6:15
7:40
12-8 Shift starts at 12:01 a.m. on the Date Indicated
C-l
-------
9PM
-------
IFtf
KOGK
C-3 '
-------
-------
8PM
7 PM
-------
IPM
-------
C-7.
-------
I PM
11 p
C-8
-------
C-9(
-------
C-10
-------
DP:*
6PM
C-ll
-------
KCGS
IIAF
c-12
-------
4PM
3PM
2PM
C-
-------
NGOii
-------
1PM
NGttt
-------
5PM
.4PH
3PW
2PM
-------
APPENDIX D
FIELD DATA
-------
t 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULAR FIELD'DATA
Plant
U/C - HM - Marietta
Run No. Preliminary Traverse
Location MIE
Date
7/27/71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJ^.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Mo.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture %
Operator CCG & LWB
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F_
Probe Tip Oia., In.
Point
1 ]
2
3
i 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
! 13
i 14
i 15
16
Avg.
Static
t
i
i
t
Clock
Tir«
Iveyy 6 in
"
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
.
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
0.68
0.72
0.73
0.72
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.76
0.76
0.78
0.80
0.80
0.78
0.74
0.75
+1.04
Orifice
in H-
Desired
AH
0
Actual 4
Dry Gas
Op
Inlet
Temp.
Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Tc^p.
op
Impinger
Tcxp
°F
.
t
Stack
Press
in. rig
.
.
Stack
Temp
or
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140 .
140
140
140
14Q
UO
140
140
i
-------
Jrt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUL,,-£ FIELD DATA
Plant u/c - KM
VERY IMPORTANT - £ILLJN_.ALL_ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test .point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Ambient Temp °F 74
Run No. Moisture
Location Marietta #1 Exhaust
Date 7/27/71
Operator CCG & LWB
BOX NO. Reg. Imp. Meter & Pump
Meter Box No. •
Probe Length 6*- £ in.
Probe Heater Sotting
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
Assumed Moisture £__
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In._
Point
3' in
it
"
Clock
TiJBs
1149
1201
Dry Gas
Meter; CF
012.04 ,
022.60
10.56
Condensatje: 30 ml
i
1
i
i
i
Pi tot
in. H20.
Ap
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
i
•
1
1
I
1
1
i
|
Outlet
75
75
75
75
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
Box
Temp.
Op
Impinger
Texp
°F
70
70
70
70
Stsck
Prsss
ir. . rig
,
Stack
T£".P
°F
140
140
140
1 140
1
1
. i
f
h
i
1
I
I
1
|
!
k
-. i
i
-------
M1E - Moisture Calculation ' 7/27/71
1, Isokinetic Sampling (Dry Gas) (cfm)
2
RJJJ «* .33 x Tm x Vg x d x PS t • Rm (corrected) = Rm x Me
TS Pb " Pm
*
Estimated Value:
Calculated Value:
2. Water Vapor Volume (cu. ft.)
Vv « .00267 x Vw * TM .00267 x 30 x 535 _ l 83
pb - pm 23.5
3. Condensate Correction for Meter Rate
Vm + Vv
1'bisture in Metered Gas (cu. ft.)
^ ** V.P. X Vq .739 x 10.56 _ 33
?b - P 23.5
5. Percent Moisture (7.) Stack Gas
% Moisture «= vv ^ '^m x 100 1>83 + .33 = 2.16_ * 17 4%
Vv + Vm ' 1.83 + 10.56 12.39
Saturated at
-------
Hrt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUL £ FIELD DATA
PI £nt HC/KM - Marietta
Run No.
Location
M1E-1
Stack Exhaust
VERY IMPORTANT - FILMM.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp °F 72
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
Assumed Moisture % 17.4
Date 7/27/71
Probe Length
10 .ft.-
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Operator CCG
Probe Heater Setting 50_
Probe Tip Dia., In.
LJ
t
i
i
1
Point
E - 3
E - 4
E - 5
Clock
TiTO
1840
1845
1859
E - 6 off:i909
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
321.33
324.49 r
328.22
330.99
E - 7 od 1915-20?) 334.32
E - 8 ;:
E - 9
1925 .... ! 337.90
1930
E - 10 | 1935
(E - llodf 1939
(E - llod 2030-31
E - 12
E - 13
E - 14
E - 15
E - 16
E - 17
E - 18
2037
2042
2047
2052
341.62
345.20
348.00
351.84
2057 j
2002
2107
2112
Avg.
379.94
58.61
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
.55
.55
.83
.65
.60
.67
.70
.62
.64
.74
.68
.70
.85
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired "
1.60
1.60
2.30
1.85
1.70
1.90
2.00
Actual
1.60
1.60
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
76
76
. 2.30 ! 76
1.85
1.70
1.90
2.00
1.80 | 1.80
!
1.90 | 1.90
2.10 | 2.10
1.90 I 1.90
2.00 | 2.00
2.45
.78 j 2.20
.76
.88
.88
.71
!
ANY INTERRUPTION OTHER
2.45
2.20
2.18 | 2.18
2.50 ! 2.50
2.50 | 2.50
2.03 I 2.03
1
THAN POWER FAILURE DUE
TROUBLE AT I^LET. |
!
. !
76
90
98
102
106
108
80
80
98
102
Outlet
76
76
76
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
-
-
-
76 | -
80
84
84
86
88
80
80
70
80
104 | 80
108
108
108
84
84
84
88 I 80
TO INLET
FILTER *
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
9.0
9.0
Box
Temp.
op
250
250
250
250
250
250
250 j
250
250
250
250 j
250
250
250
250
250
250
5.7 1 250
1
:LOG OR P
OLLEY
Ircpinger
Ts^p
70
70
70
70
70
Stack
Press
in. Hg
1.60
1.60 .
1.60
1.60 •
1.60
Stack
Temp
°F
140
140
140
140
140
70. 1.60 j 140
70 1.60
70 1.60
70 1.60
70 1.60
70 1.60
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
i
140
140
>
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
T40 .
140
140
!'
-------
>t 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUUii* FIELD DATA
Plant
UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. M1E-2
Location Exhaust"
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Condensate +210 ml
Ambient Temp °F 68
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
Assumed Moisture %
Date
7/29/71
Probe Length
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
'Gonzalez & Baxley
Probs Heater Setting 50
Probe Tip 01 a., In. .25
Point
3
*4
5
*6
7
8
*g
10
**11
1416) 12
13
Clock
Ttoe
1035
1038
1050
1110
1115
1120
1125
1155
1205
1421
1426
14 1 1431
i 15
i 16
1 17
18
1436
1441
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
383.72 *
386.02
389.91
393.40
397.50
400.52
403.62
407.50
411.50
£2"$: ^2*
428.05
431.50
435.17
Pitot
in. K£0
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.76
0.76
0.51
0.51
0.71
0.63
0.73
0.73
0.76
0.82
439.20 i 0.73
1446 j 443.20 | 0.76
1451
i
i
i
i
(gO Min.)
447.32
63.60
0.70
0.66
* Power Off.
** Sampling |interrupte
-
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.20
2.20
1.45
1.45
2.00
. 1.80
Actual
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.20
2.20
1.45
1.45
2.00
1.80
2.10 1 2.10
2.10
2.15
2.10
2.15
2.40 | 2.40
2.10
2.20
2.00
2.10
2.20
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
Inlet
72
72
72
84
84
84
84
86
86
86
90
98
102
108
108
2.00 108
2.03 | 2.03
1 .
1
89
1 - Complete fewer Failure.
-11 --i—
Outlet
90
90
90
72
72
72
72
74
74
70
76
80
80
80
80
80
78
,
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.0
6.0
8.0
9..0
8.0
8.0
9.0
5.6
BOX
op '
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Irr.pinger
•F
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60 J
60
60
60
60
60
; 60
60
250 | 60
1
•
Stack
Press
in. rig
.
Stack
'°F
140
140
| 140
140
i 140
! 140
"
140
140
140 .
140
L140
140
140
140
140
140
»
140
\
-------
">rt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIL./E FIELD DATA
Plant
UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. M1E-3
Location Exhaust
Dste 7/30/71
Operator Gonzalez and Baxley
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampting, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Condensate 160 ml
Ambient Temp CF 68
Bar. Press. "Hg .29.5
Assumed Moisture % 17.4
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Probe Heater Setting 50
Probo Tip Dia., In. .25
-------
/art 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULafE FIELD DATA
Plant DC/RM - Marietta
Run No. _
Location
Dcte
M.E-4
Exhaust
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Condensate +240 ml
Ambient Temp °F 80
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
Assumed Moisture %
7-31-71
Baxley and Gonzalez
Probe Length 11'
Heater Box Setting, °F ?sn
Prcba Heater Setting 70
Probe Tip Dia., In. 0.25
g
s
• 1
1
i
Point
Start
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Start
Clock
Tira
1029
1034
1039
1044
1049
1054
1059
1104
1109
1114
1119
1124
1129
1134
1139
1144
1149
1237
1242
"iW
95 min.
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
549.14'
553.47
557.20
561.20
565.17
569.04
572.88
576.80
579.60
584.14
586.28
592.36
596.27
60Q.41
604.50
607.40
612.37
(PI
Re
612.37
616.20
fe%
-------
Jrt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULAR FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT -
BLANKS
: Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No.
Location
Date
M1E-5 •
'Exhaust
7-31-71
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and. record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length _
Condensate +254 ml
Ambient Temp °F 70
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
Assumed Moisture % 17-6
11'4'
Mccter Box Setting, °F 25°
Op2rator Baxley and Gonzalez
Probe Heater Setting 70
Probe Tip Oia., In. .25
Point
Start
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Pwr.Off 13
[Vr.On 13
14
15
16
17
18
1 AVG.
~~
Clock
Tin:-
1530
1545
1550
1555
1600
1605
1610
1615
1620
1625
1630
1634
1647-48
1653
1658
1703
1708
1713
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
623.61 '
635.10
638.59
642.49
646.47
650.34
654.14
657.97
661.62
665.32
669.50
673.80
677.99
682.17
686. 17
690.00
693.92
70.31
Pi tot
in. H20 •
AP
0.65
0.65
0.75
0.70
0.70
0.64
0.65
0.65
0.62
0.80
0.94
0.75
0.73
0.71
0.73
0.65
0.66
I
Orifice
in H^,
Desired
1.90
1.90 J
2.20'
2.00
2.00
1.85
1.90
1.90
1.80
2.30
2.60
2.20
2.10
?. in
?.in
1.90
2.05
AH
0
Actual
'
1.90
1.90
2.20
2.00
2.00
1.85
1.90
1.90
1.80
2.30
2.60
2.20
2.10
2.10
2.10
1.90
2.05
Dry Gas
Op
Inlet
84
104
110
110
116
116
120
120
120
120
122
l:»6
126
124
120
118
116
Temp.
Outlet
84
88
90
90
96
96
98
98
98
98
100
100
.100...
100
98
96
96
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
.
Box
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
?sn
2.5Q
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
Temp
°r
65
65
65
65
fiS •
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
•6'5
65
65
65
65
•
C* T<-
o i_uCi\
Press
in. Hq
0.11 .
Stack
Ten-?
op
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140 .
140
LI 40
140
140 !
140
140
140 •
140
f
-------
|irt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUL..* FIELD DATA
Plant
- Marietta
; Run No. MlE-7
Location Exhaust'
Dste 8-1-71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN .ALL, BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test .point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Ambient Temp °F 86
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.70
Assumed Moisture % 17.4.
Op3ratOr Schroeder and Gonzalez
Probe Length
11'
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Prcbs Heater Sotting 70
Probe Tip Oia., In. .250
V
*i
• !
1
Point
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
AVG.
Clock
Tiisa
1525
1540
1545
1550
1555
1600
1605
1610
1615
1620
1625
1630
1635
1640
1645
1650
1655
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
455.83 -
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
_
-
_
-
-
-
524.82
68.99
Pi tot
in. H£0
Ap
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.68
0.68
0.70
0.70
0.73
0.75
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.73
Ori f i ce
in Ho
Desired "
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2,10
1.90
1.90
1.95
1.95
2.05
2.10
2.00
2.00
2.30
2.19
, ,,-„,.. ._., -r
^
AH '
0
Actual
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
1.90
1.94
1.95
1.95
2.05
2,10
2.00
2.00
2.30
2.19
Dry Gas
or
inlet
98
112
116
115
118
123
126
127
132
134
134
136
137
135
136
133
135
119
Temp.
Outlet
86
89
90
91
93
96
97
100
103
103
105
107
108
109
109
103 ..
109
101
Pun-.p
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.2
6.5
6.7
7.0
7.0
7.5
5.2
Box
Tc.Tip.
°F
250
250
-
-
_
_
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
_
_
Iir.pinger
Tcn:p
°F
70
75
75
75
75 •
75
75 •
75
80
80
75
75
75
•75
75
75
75
•
$*• -~i,
cuCX
Press
in. He;
0.10 .
-
-
-
_
_
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
_
_
Stack
Te-p
°F
135
135
140
140
135
135
135
135 .
135
135
135
135
135
135
]35
1^ .
• 135
-------
Jrt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUtait FIELD DATA
Plant
- Marietta
Run No. M1E-8
Location Exhaust
Dcte 8-2-71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN .ALL. BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. 2_
Meter Box .No. 4
Condensate +265 ml
Ambient Temp °F .78
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.70
Assumed Moisture * 14.7
Operator Schroeder and Avery
Probe Length IV
Heater Box Setting, °F
250
Probe Heater Setting
Probe Tip Dia., In. 0.25
1
o
%
1
• i
1
Point
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
AVG.
Clock
Tira
0945
1000
1005
1010
1015
1020
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1100
1105
1110
1115
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
525.91
536.48
539.62
542.84
547.27
550.32
554.61
558.73
563.34
566.69
570.47
574.30
578.15 j
583.00
586.78
589.88
593.87
67.96
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.75
0.75
0.80
0.80
0.7S
0.75
0.75
0.67
0.70
0.75
0.68
0.70
0.63
0.72
Orifice
in H^
Desired "
1.7
7.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.02
AH
0
Actual
1.7
7.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.2
9.1
2.1
2.1
1.9
2.0
.2,1
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.02
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
72
94
102
110
115
117
120
120
120
125
129
132
134
135
136
138
139
123
Temp.
Outlet
70
74
76
80
82
88
88
90
90
92
94
96
99
100
102
105
106
91
Pun;?
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
5
5
5
6
7
8
7
7
7
8
7.5
7.5
7.5
8
8.5
8
6.6
Box
Te-rp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
2sn
250
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
Ircpinger
Temp
°F
75
75
80
80
86 .
86
80
80
80
80
80
74
90
•?5
95
95
83
Stcck
Press
in. Kg
0.10 .
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
Stsck
TG-P
op
120
125
125
125
135
135
125
I'M .
130
130
125
125
125 !
125
125
1*25 .
127
1
1
-------
. >t 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
! P1 ant UC/RM - Marietta
; Run No. MlE-9
Location Scrubber Exhaust
Date' 8-2-71
Op3ratOr Schroedsr anH
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJK.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sraple Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Prcba Heater
Condensate +220 ml
Ambient Temp °F 78
>. 2
I*.
11'
Setting
70
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.70
Assumed Moisture % 14.7
Heater Box Setting, °F 300
Probe Tip Dia., In.__, 0.25
Point
3
4
5
6
7
* 8
9
10
11
12
1 13
i 14
15
16
17
18
AVG.
* S
r
L .
Clock
Tiisa
1805
1820
1825
1830
1835
1840
1910
1915
1920
1925
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1953
2000
tODoed to
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
593.97 "
664.92
70.95
clean pftot li
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
0.86
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.98
0.84
0.65
0.65
0.75
0.78
0.75
0.60
0.70
0.63 •
0.75 '
0.80
0.76
nes.
Orifice
in H,
Desired
2.40
2.35
2.30
2.25
2.80
2.35
1.85
1.85
2.10
2.15
2.10
1.70
2.00
.1.80
2.10
2.25
-2.ni
AH
0
Actual
2.40
2.35
2.30
2.25
2.80
2.35
1.85
1.85
2.10
2.15
2.10
1.70
2.. 00
1.80
2.10
2.25
2.01
,
Dry Gas
°F
|_lnlet
77
110
115
120
122
124
103
108
109
111
115
117
118
115
120
124
122
11 5
Temp.
Outlet
76
80
8?
85
90
91
89
89
90
90
90
91
91
91
92
93
95
%
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
4.5
4.8
5.0
6.0
6.5
6.5
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.0
6.4
Box
Temp.
°F
300
_
—
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
_
-
_
_
Ircpinger
Tsxp
°F
80
80
80
80
80-
90
90
85
85
90
90
90
95
95
100
100
RR
•
Stcck
Press
in. no,
0.10.
_
_
- -
_
-
_
-
-
-
_
-
_
_
-
-
Stsck
Terr.?
°F
140
130
130
125
150
135
130
125 .
135
135
135
135
135 '
133
135
133 .
1 *U
-------
t 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULAit FIELD DATA
Plant UC/BM - Marietta
Run No. MIE - 10
Location Exhaust
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test'point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. _
Meter Box No.
C = 0.8
: Filter Number - 2FN-30A
Condensate +262 ml
Ambient Temp °F 75.
Bar, Press. "Hg 29.6
Assumed Moisture % 17.4
Date • 8-3-71
Probe Length
li1
Hester Box Setting, °F 200
Operator Blessing
Probe Heater Setting 80
Probe Tip Oia., In. 1/4
Point
0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
i 13
14
i 15
16
17
18
AVG.
Clock
lira
1010
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1100
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
1130
1135
1140
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
665.87 *
676.51
-
-
687.82
691.57
695.64
700.07
-
708.11
711.70
715.32
• 719.18
723.12
727.20
731.00
734.59
68.72
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
0.68
0.65
0.70
0.65
0.70
0.65
1.00
0.90
0.75
0.75
0.60
0.6Q
0.70
0.70
0.75
0.65
0.60
0.71
Ori f i ce
in Hx,
Desired *"
2.0
1.9
2.1 J
1.9
2.1
1.9
2.9
2.6
2.2
2.2
1.8
1.8
2.1
2.1
2.2
1.9
1.8
2.1
- .. ..........
AH
0
Actual
2.0
1.9
2.1
1.9_
2.1
1.9
2.9
2.6
2.2
2.2
1.8
1.8
2.1
2.1
2.2
1.9
1,8
2.1
Dry Gas
°F
inlet
70
93
96
96
98
98:
102
101
101
105
106
104
105
104
105
105
106
100
Temp.
Outlet
70
72
72
Jb
76
76
78
. 80
80
82
94
Qfi
96
86
85
85
85
8?
Pinnp
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.0
4.5
5.0
7.0
6.5
6.0
6.5
6.0
fi.n
7.0
7.5
8.0
7.5
7.n
S.fl
.
Box
Temp.
op
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
inn
300
300
300
300
inn
son
Ircpinger
Tcn:p
o<-
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
7S
80
Qn
90
75
•15
75
7S
R1
•
Stcck
Press
in. rig
2.0
2.0 .
1.8
1.8 '
1.8
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.0
1 .7
1.1
1 .1
1.?
1.2
1.1
1.0
1 .1
1 .S
t
Stack
Te"P
°F
^120
130
130
130
130
130
135
135
1'30 .
nn
135
1 IS
130
135
130
130
I'm -
• nn
1
i
" i
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
1
1:
A
o
c
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No.
M1E-11
Location Exhaust"
Date
8-3-71
Operator Blessing and Avery
Point
. 0
3
4
Clock
Tijsa
1400
1415
1420
5 1425
6 1430
7
8
9
1435
.1440
1445
10 ! 1450
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
735.36
746.70
749.87
753.61
Pitot
in. H£0
AP
0.95
0.65
0.60
0.65
756.98 0.60
761.10
-
768.82
772.85
11 1455 776.72
12
1500
13 1505
14 1510
15
0.75
0.65
0.70
0.70
0.65
780.30 0.60
784.16 0.65
787.72
0.65
1515 - . 0.70
16 1520
17
1525
Rea'd 'and record .at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. 4
Meter Box No. 4
Probe Length 11'
Probe Heater Setting
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired
2.8
1.9
1.7
1.85
1.75
2.2
1.9
2.05
Actual
2.8
1.9
1.7
1.85
1.75
2.2
1.9
2.05
2.05 2.05
1.9 ! 1.9
1.75
1.9
1.75
1.9
1.9 1.9
2.05
0.70 2.05
799.22 0.70
18 i 1530 803.15
-.
Avg.
0.70
2.05
2.05
2.05
2.05
2.05 2.05
100
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
Inlet
76
100
104
107
108
110
111
112
114
Outlet
76
78
82
84
86
87
88
90
91
112 i 91
112
114
115
116
116
92
93
93
94
94
118 j 95
118
|
67.79 0.67 2.0 2.0
.
•
j
95
109 ' 89
1
1
C = .8
: Filter Num
Condensate
Ambient Te
Bar. Press
Assumed Mo
Mecter Box
' Probe Tip
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
9.0
6.0
6.0
6.5
6.5
6.0
7.5
8.5
8.0
8.5
Box
Temp .
op
300
300
300
300
ber - 2FN-31A
+248 ml .
mp °F 75 '
. "Hg 29.6
isture % 17.4
Setting, °F 30°
Dia., In.
Impinger
Tcxp
°F
70
75
75
70
300 70
300
300
300
300
300
7.5 300
7.5
8.5.
10.0
10.0
10.5
10.5
300
300
300
300
300
300
65 .
65
1/4
Stack
Press
in. no,
1.8
1.6 .
1.7
1.6
1.8
Stack
Tessp
op
130
130
135
130
135
1.6 ! 130
1.7 130
70 1.7 135
70
2.0
t30 .
70 1.9 130
70
1.8
70 1.8
70
75
75
1.8
1.8
1.9
75 1.7
75
1.6
1.8
i
i
•
[ 135
135
135
135
135
135
1'35 .
133
- i
!
-------
Irt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULali FIELD DATA
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No.
M1E-12
Location Exhaust
Dcte 8/4/71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN_.ALL. BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Condensate '+233 ml
Ambient Temp CF 75
Ear. Press. "Kg
29.5
Assumed Moisture % 17.4
Probe Length IT
Jlecter Dox Setting, °F 300
Blessing
Probe Heater Setting 90
Probe Tip Oia., In. 1/4
Point
0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
i 14
i 15
i 16
17
18
i
i
Clock
Tis:e
1115
1130
1135
1140
1145
1150
.1155
1200
1205
1210
1215
1220
1225
1230
1235
1240
1245
.
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
803.25 "
-
816.82
-
824.07
827.02
830.52
-
-
-
843.70
-
854.30
854.72 .
858.43
862.00
865.61
62.36
Pitot
in. H£0
AP
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.65
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.60
0.60
0.58
•
Orifice
in H/,
Desired "
1.8
1.8
1.8 |
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.7
AH
0
Actual
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.9
1.9
1.8
1,6_,
1.8
1.8
1.7
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
66
86
88
90
88
94
94
98
104
106
106
108
116
116
118
118
118
101 '
Temp.
Outlet
66
68
68
70
71
74
74
76
78
78
78
78
86
88
SB
90
90
78
Pu^p
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
4.5
5.0
•5.0
5.5
5.5
L 6.5
6.0
6.0
7.0
7.0
7.5
9.5
9.5
10.0
.. 9.0
10.0
10.0
72
Box
Temp.
°F
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300 ^J
300
300
300
Ircpinger
TE^P
°F
70
70
70
70
70
80 .
80
75
70
70
75
75
85
90
*A
95
95
78
Stcck
Press
in. Hr;
1.8
1.7 .
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.8
1.6
1.7
i
Stack
Temp
«p
135
130
130
130
130
130
135
130
T35 .
130
130
130
130
130
l^n
130
T35 .
132
i
i
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
UC/RM - Marietta
MID
Location Duct inlet
Date
7/28/71
Operator Blessing & Schroeder
A to E • Left to r|.ght, facing exhaust stack.
Clock
Time
•
Point
A-l
A- 2
A-3
A-4
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-4
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
D-l
AP, In. H20
0.58
0.57
0.48
0.42
0.38
0.48
0.58
0.53
0.24
0.33
.0.33
0.32
•0.48
Stack
Temp., °F
603
522
598
608
698 '
705
648
562
726
751
829 '
805
772
Stack
Pres. , In. Hg
.
.
•
AP x (T+460T
'AP x (T+IGOTI
r
i
i
!
i
j
•
j
t
!
i
i
i
j
i
•
3epth
Feet
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
Vsr*
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Consents:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
D-15
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
Location
Date
Duct #1 Continued
7/28/71
Operator
Clock
Time
-•
AVG.
Point
D-2
D-3
D-4
E-l
E-2
E-3
.E-4
AP, 1n. H20
0.48
0.56
0.55
0.72
0.70
0.72
0.63
0.50
-
•
Stack
Temp., °F
780
888
835
810
810
820
780
725
Stack
Pres. , In. Hg
.
• . •
AP x (T+460J*
•'AP x (T+460J*i
t
i
i
I
i
. • f
i
• 1
__ 1
i
i
"I
I
.
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Corrjnents: •
NCAP-29 (12/67) . " '
D-16
-------
.art 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLN .ALL BLANKS
PI ant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. MlD-4-
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and. record every 5
minutes.
Box No.
+ 12 ml Condensate
Ambient Temp °F 80
Bar. Press. "Hg
Location Tni«»* +•»
7-31-71
Meter Box No.
Probo Length
Assumed Moisture % 2.0
11'
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Oparator Blessing
Prcbs Heater Setting 65
Probo Tip Dia., In. 3/16
Point
0
Clock
Ttee
f 1030
A-41
A- 3
A-2|
A-l
-
0
B-4
1042
12
.1046
B-3i '
B-2
B-l
_ '
0
C-4
1055
1105
C-3t
C-2
c-1!
—
1117
Ol 1129
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
174.44
175.78
177.00
178.35
179.38
4.94
179.38
180.56
181.72
182.80
183.60.
.4.22:
183.60
184.47
184.40
186.22
186.80
.3.20
186.80
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.63
0.63
0.58
0.68
0.41
0.59
0.64
0.64
0.58
0.45
0.24
0.50
0^35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.13'
0.31
0.73
H-41 ! 188.00 !• 0.62
D-3
D-2
-'-£-'1
-
'
189.20
190.32
— "IST.!*
1141 ' 4.32
0.55
0.48
0.15
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired
0.55
0.55 .
0.50
0.59
0.36
0.51
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.33
0.18
0.37
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.10
0.20
0.51
0,43
0.39
0.49
0.16
0.53 1 0.40
Actual
0.55
0.55
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
84
85
0.51 , 87
0.59
0.36
0.51
0.45
0.45
0.45
0033
90
90
87
88
90
91
94
0.18 ! 95
0.37
0.23
0.23
0.23
...0.23...
0.10
0.20
0.51
0.43
0.39
0.49
0.16
0.40
92
90
91
.9.2
93
93
92
90 '
92
94
97
98
94
Outlet
82
83
83
83
84
83
84
84
85
86
86
85
86
88
..SB_...
89
89
88
90
90
90
90
91
90
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
2.0
2.7
200
2.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.5
1.5
Box
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
.1.5 1 250
1.5
1.0
1.4
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.5
1.0
2.0 .
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Impinger
Tcxp
°F
• -
-
-
-
—
90
—
-
Stcck
Press
in. He;
1.2
i
— .
Stack
leap
°F
500
495
480
480
475
1.2 486
-
—
-
1 -
- I -.
100
s •"
•;-
_
—
90
-
_
-
• -
90
1.2
1.1
_
_
—
1.1
1.2
_
-
-
505
555
830 .
680
L680
600
800
775 j
775
750
725 .
_J£5
695
650
325
280
280 j
1.2 I 446 |
-------
• •
Point
0
E-4
3
2
1
-
i
i
i
i
Clock
Tircs
1245
1
1257
12
60
1
1
i
1
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
191.40
192.56
193.74
195.20
196.38
4.98
21.66
.
•
Pitot
in. H20
AP
0.60
0.60
0.82
0.87
0.61
0.70
0.53
M1F>4
Ori f i ce
in H-j
Desired *
0.46
0.46 .
0.59
0-62
0.44
0.51
0.40
•
-
cb^.Jnsq
AH
0
Actual
0.46
0.46
0.60
0.62
0.44
0.52
0.40
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
86
88
90
94
95
91
92
Temp.
Outlet
87
87
87
88
88
87
87
Pum?
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.7
2.2
BOX
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Inpinger
°r
_
-
-
_.
«•
80
90
•
Stcck
Press
in. Hr»
0.90
—
^ .
_
0.90
1.12
Stsck
Tenip
op
625
680
710
710
268
699
'599.
1
Cor.ir.snts:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
o
Assumed moisture %- 2.0
Tm = 80°
Ps/Pm = 99 29.49/29.50
Static = 0.007
C Factor - 1.35
-------
Par/TO, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant
. UC/EM - Marietta
Run No. MLD-5
: Location Inlet to Scrubber
Dcte 7-31-71
Operator Blessing
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL. BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
+ 1 ml Condensate
Ambient Temp CF 90
>. 2
2
11'
Setting
65
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
. , „ . . , _, _ . /FROM C
Assumed Moisture % 6.41 HlB-
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Oia., In. 3/16
Point
0
A-4
A-3
A- 2
A-l
—
0
B-4
B-3
B-2
B-l
—
0
i C-4
' C-3
C-2
r-l
i
0
D-4
D-3
D-2
D-l
-
Clock
Tira
1500^
\
I
t
1512 3
12
1516 A
)
f
r
i us J
d.2}
1540 >
I
\
•52 J
12
1555^)
/
I
(
<607J
IT*
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
196.85
197.90
199.98
—
201.05
4.20
201.05
202.20
203.30
204.26
204.96
3.91
204.96
205.70
206.51
—
207 -flR
2.92
207.88
208.90
210.08
211.07
211.79
3.91
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
h 0.50
0.52
0.53
0.65
0.36
0.52
0.65
0.63
0.56
0.41
0.21
0049
0.28
0.26
0.35 •
0.28
0.1=5
0.26
0.60
. 0.58
0.66
0.54
0.20
0.52
Orifice
in Hn
Desired "
0.38
0.40
0.38
0.48
0.27
0.38
0.46
0.44
0.40
0.28
0.14
0.34
0.16
0.16
0.22
0.18
n,i n
O.lfi
0.38
0.37
0.43
0.35
0.14
0.33
AH
0
Actual
0.38
0.40
0.38
0.48
0.27
0*38
0.46
0.44
0.40
0.28
0.14
0.36
0.16
0.16
0.22
0.18
n.i n
0T16
0.38
0.37
0.43
0.35
0.14
0.33
Dry Gas
Op
Inlet
90
90
91
94
94
92
94
96
98
98
98
97
95
96
96
98
QR
97
98
99
.101
102
102
iop
Temp.
Outlet
88
88
88
89
89
88
90
90
91
91
92
91
92
94
94
94
Q4
94
94
94
95'
96
96 ^
95
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
2.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
2.5
2.4
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
3.4
2.0.
2.0
3.5
3.0
2 n
2.S
3.0
3B0
8.5
8.0
5.0
5.5 •,.
Box
Tornp.
L °F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
2RO
2^0
250
2.50.
250
250
£™
250 ,
Impinger
Tcrrp
°F
_
—
-
-
80
—
—
-
_
_
100
_
—
. ;_
f
_
i nn
_
_
_
—
• —
100
Stcck
Press
in. Kg
1.1
1.1 .
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
i n
i"o
1.1
_
_
—
—
1.1
Stcck
Tcm?
°F
515
560
540
560
560
547
635
615
605 .
655
620
626
738
780
780
814
fi1 n .
744
725
740
694
635
700
699
-------
Point
0
E-4
E-3
Clock
1614
E-2
E-l
-
1626
12
60
!
i
i
Dry Gas
Kater, CF
211.79
213.00
214.13
215.39
216.57
4.78
19.72
• !
i
j
1
i
Pi tot
in. K20
AP
0.65
0.65
0.78
0,88
0.60
0.71
0.50
Orifice AH
in FUO
Desired
0.42
0.42
0.51
0.56
0.32
0.46
0-31
Actual
0,42
0.42
0.51
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
inlet 1 Outlet
100
100
103
0.52 i 105
0.40
0.46
0-31
1
1
•
106
107
98
96
96
96
Punip
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
9.0
12.0
17.5
97 25.0
97
96
93
1
1
.
•
1
Box
Ter.p .
°F
250
250
250
250
20.0 |250
16.7
6,1
• |
1
'
250
250
Ircpir.ger
Tczp
°r
_
—
-
-
— .
_
C AA» <-'•
Press
in. no
1.1
_
Stsck
Tcr:.p
°F
737
745
710
-
—
1.1
1
|
795
795
755
674
'
1
1
Comments:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
to
O
-------
10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUU/E FIELD DATA
PI ant PC/RM - Marietta
Run NO. MlB-6
Location inlet to Scrubber
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJOLL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test-point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Mo.
Meter Box No.
+ 12 ml Condensate
Ambient Temp °F 78
Bar. Press. "Hg__
29.5
Assumed Moisture % 6.0
Date
8-1-71
Probe Length
11'
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Operator 'Blessing
Probe Heater Setting 65
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
Point
0
A-4
A-3
A- 2
A-l
—
0
B-4
B-3
B-2
B-l
0
i C-4
! C-3
C-2
C-l
i
1 o
D-4
D-3
i D-2
1 D-,1
Clock
Tfae
1100
1112
1125
1137
1150
1202
1208
*
122Q
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
217.84 '
219.00
220.20
_
202.53
4069
222.53
-
—
226.00
226.27
4.24
226.77
227.70
228.50
229.35
229.87
3.10
229.87
231.03
237.24
233.43
234 3§
4.49
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.68
0.40
0.58
0.63
0.65
0.60
0.46
0.25
0.57
0.32
0,32
0.32
0.28
0.15
0.28
0.69
0.69
0.73
0.67
Q«26 i
0.61 1
Orifice
in H-j
Desired
0.48
0.48
0.52
0..58
0.35
0.48
0.54
0.56
0.47
0.39
0.18
0.43
0.24
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.11
0.20
0.48
0.48
0.54
0.50
P i 9
0.44
AH
0
Actual
0.48
0.48
0.52
- 0.58
0.35
0048
0.54
0.56
0.47
0.39
0.18
0.43
0..24
0.24
0.22
0.20
0,11
0.20
0.48
0.48
_0J!_5_2_
0.50
0.44
Dry Gas
Op
inlet
82
83
85
88
90
86
86
88
90
92
93
90
90
92
92
94
94
92
93
94
96
93
94
Temp.
Outlet
80
81
81
81
82
81
84
84
85
85
86
85
87
87
88
88
89
88
90
90
90
91
91
90
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
3.0
3.0
4.5
6.0
5.5
4.4
6.0
9.5
9.0
9.5
6.5
8.1
6.5
9.0
10.0
10.0
8.0
9.1
14.0
20'. 5
24.5
5.0
., 3.5,.
Box
op
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
25 0_^
250
-
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
Tsxp
°F
-
-
—
_
90
-
-
-
-
100
_
—
• r
-
100
-
-
_
_.
' ^,
100
Stack
Press
i n . Kg
1.2
•
—
_
1.2
1.2
-
-
-
1.2
1.0
—
-
-
-
1.0
1.2
_
«.
__
-.
1.2
Stack
°F
555
495
500
505
465
504
485
550
4S5 .
555
I 565
530
715
785 \
805
690
703 .
740
.755
625
625
665
fa6"5 i
667 i
-------
MTfi-6 CONTINUED
Point
0
E-4
E-3
! E-2
E-l
Clock
Tircs
1235
'
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
234.36
_•
236.61
238,10
239.38
5.02
60
t
\
21.54
Pi tot
In. H^O
AP
0.60
0.60
0.82
0.85
0.70
Oo71
0.50
1
I
\
1
Orifice AH
in H00
De-sired *
.0.44
0»44
0.60
0.57
0.58
0..53
0.42
Actual
0.44
0B44 '
0.60
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet 'Outlet
93
95
98
0.57 i 102
0.58 103
0.53
0.42
I
1
1
1
* Filtek: Changed. I
l .
98
92
90
91
91
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
7,0
7.5
10.0
Box
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
92 111.0 250
92
91
87
12.5 (250
9.6
8.9
I
!
!
1
' 1
i
1 1 i
•
I
•
.
1
[
t
250
250
Ircpinger
Te:;:p
°r
-
—
-
-
—
100
98
S*. ^ ^ i.
UUwA.
Press
in. He;
Stcck
Tcrsp
op
1.4 680
—
650
595
-
-
520
515
1.4 592
1.2
.
-
607
'
fc •
*
Corr.rr.2nts:
.NCAP-37-(12/67)
C = 1.13
% Moisture =6.0
Tm = 78°
AH @ = 1.95
PS/Pm = .997
-------
rt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUL .£ FIELD DATA
Plant
PC/RM - Marietta
Run No. MiD-7
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN^.AU^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. .
Box No.
•f 10 ml Condensate
Pb - 29.7-
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg
90
29.7
Location Inlet to Scrubber
Dcte 8/1/71
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Assumed Moisture 2 6.0
11
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Operator Blessing
Prcbs Heater Setting 65
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
Point
0
A -4
A -3
A -2
A-l
_
0
B-4
B-3
B-2
B-l
- '
o
C-4
C-3
C-2
C-l
-
6
D-4
D-3
D-2
D-l
•'••"•"•-" ;—•
Clock
Tfae
1525
•
.
1*43
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
239.45 -
-
241.71
242.98
244.06
4.61
244.06
-
246.37
247.44
248.15
4.07
248.13
249.04
249.90
250.67
251.27
.3.14
251.27
252.45
* 253.65
254.60
255.41
3.14
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
0.66
0.61
0.63
0.75
0.45
0.62
0.60
0.63
0.60
0.50
0.22
0.51
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.28
0.15
0.28
0.72
0.72
,_ 0.78
0.73
0.29
0.65
Orifice
in H,
Desired v
0.48
0.44
0.49 J
0.47
0.38
0.45
0.45
0.47
0.47
0.34
0.16
0.38
0.26
0.26
0.22
0.20
0.10
0.21
0.48
0.48
0.52
0.49
0.20
0.43
AH
0
Actual
0.48
0.44'
0.49
0.47
0,38
0.45
0.45
0.47
0.47
0.34
0.16
0.38
0.26
0.26
0.22
0.20
0.10
0.21
0.48
0.48
0.49
0.20
0,43
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
92
92
95
96
97
94
98
98
101
102
103
100
103
103
103
104
104
103
100 '
102
103
98
100
101
Temp.
Outlet
91
91
91
91
91
91
92
92
93
93
94
93
96
96
96
96
92
96
97
98
98
96
97
97
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gsuge
3.0
3,0
6.0
6.0
5.5
4.7
6.0
7.0
9.0
8.5
5.5
7.2 _j
8.0
8.5
8.5
9.0
7.0
8.2
16*5
20.5
25.0
4.0
3.0
13.8.
Box
Terrp.
L °F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Ir.pinger
°F
' _
-
-
-
-
100
-
-
.
_ .
100
-
'
-
-
90
-
_
"
-
• -
90
Stack
Press
in. Hg
1.3
-
-
-
-
.1.3
1.1
-
-
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
-
1.1
0.90
_
-
-
-
0.90
Stack
Temp
°F
430
540
515
454
454
479
550
510
505
550
550
593
520
720
650
705
7D5 .
660
725
705
727
695
680
706
-------
MID- 7 C6MT|K|(/£D
Point
0
E-4
E-3
Clock
Tirtt
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
255.41
-
258.03
E-2
E-l
-
260.47
1700 | 5.06
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.90
0.72
0.83
20.02 0.58
! ! i
i
.
i
>
* Filtet Changed
1
'
•1 I
I
•
.
Orifice AH
in HoO
Des i red '
•0.59
0.59
0.56
0.61
0.50
0.57.
0,41
•
••
Actual
0.59
0.59
0.56
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
98
100
103
0.61 104
0.50
0.57
104
102
0.41 100
1
• .
1
1
1
i
1
i
1
.
L Out let
97
97
98
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
7.0
8.0
10.5
99 15.5
99
93
95
i
15.5
11.3
9.0
Box
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Inpir.ger
Tcn:p
op
-
_
-
85
93
i i
i
'
i
,
1
1
,
I
S* - «. i.
UUvA
Press
in. He
l.l
_
--
-
-
l.l
-
Stack
Tcn-p
op
670
800
730
730
660
718
631
t
I
i
Coirments:
NCAP-371(12/67)
a
Assumed moisture %- 6.0
T = 90
m
Ps/Pm = 1.0
C Factor - 1.09
-------
i-d'rt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant PCRM
Hun No.
Location Inlet 'to Scrubber
8/2/71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN - ALL. BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. •_
Probe Length
+ 12 Condensate
Ambient Temp °F SO^
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.7
Assumed Moisture % 6.0
11
Operator Blessing
Probe Heater Setting 65
Heater Box Setting, *F 250
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
Point
0
A-4
A-3
A- 2
A-l
-
0
B-4
B-3
B-2
B-l
-
i 0
C-4
1 C-3
111 C-2
C-l
_
0
D-4
n-3
D-2
t !r~r
L . rtf
I
Clock
Tira
0945
0957
— — — — — TC
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
260.65
261.70
262.85
264.05
264.94
4.29
264.94
266.17
267.38
-
269.00
4.06
269.00
269.65
270.38
—
271.61
2.61
271.61
272.83
27/1.13
275.16
27^.90
4.29
Pi tot
in. H£0
Ap
0.55
0.55
0.62
0.73
0.40
0.57
0.73
0.70
0.70
0.43
0.21
0.55
0.30
0.30
0.35
0.25
0.17
0.26
0.80
O.RO
0.90
0.55
0.34
0.66
Orifice
in Ho
Desired w
0.43
0.43
0.46
0.52
0.25
0.42
0.54
0.25
0.52
0.30
0.14
0.40
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.14
0.10
0.14
.0.53
0.65
0.32
0.17
0.44
AH
0
Actual
P. 43
0.43
0.46
0.52
0.25
0.42
0.54
0.52
0.52
0.30
0.14
0.40
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.14
0.10
0.14
0.53
0.53
0.59
0.32
',,0.17 ...
0.43
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
82
87
88
90
92
88
91
93
94
97
97
94
95
97
97
98
98
97
9R
100
100
98
99
99
Temp.
Outlet
82
85
85
85
85
84
86
87
87
88
89
87
90
90
91
91
91
91
94
93
95
95
96
95
Pirap
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
2.0
2.5
3.5
5.0
4.0
3.4
6.5
9.0
10.0
10.5
7.5
8.7
6.0
8.0
8.5
8.0
6.5
7.4.
17.0
-21.5 _^
25.0
1.5
2.0
13.4.
Box
Temp .
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
. 250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
Tcn:p
°F
80
_
—
-
90
—
—
""
—
90
_
. —
• ; -
-
—
100
—
—
. -
100
Stack
Press
in. Hg
1.3
_
_
—
1.3
1.2
—
_
1.2
1.1
—
—
-
—
1.1
1 .1
_
-
-
1.1
Stack
Tea?
°F
490
545
625
800
492
492
550
545
670 .
700
810
655
1120
1050 !
845
445
500 .
797
700
640
750
640
650
672 1
-------
Ml
Point
0
E-4
E-3
E-2
E-l
i
1
i
i
i
\
!
Clock
TlKS
1103
1115
60
-
Dry Gas
Mater, CF
275.90
277.16
278.40
279.68
2R0.70
4.80
20.05
-
Pitot
in. H20
AP
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.85
0.40
0.73
0.55
* Filte
Orifice
in Ho
De-si red
0.55
0.55
0.52
0.56
0.33
0.50
0.38
.
r Changed-
•
.
AH
0
Actual
0.55
0.55 '
0.52
0.56
0.33
0.50
0.38
V .
'
.
• •
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
98
100
103
104
104
102
96
Temp.
Outlet
95
96
97
97
98
97
91 ,
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
4.0
6.0
L_7'°
10.0
9.0
7.2
8.0
Box
Terr.p.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Irupinger
Tc:;:p
°F
-•
-
—
—
__
90
94
C*. ./.I.
OLliC/t
Press
in. Ho
1.3
—
—
1.3
1.2
Stsck
Ten-.?
°F
650
750
4bb
450
450
551
633
h
Co-ments:
NCAP-37-(12/67)
o
I
IsJ
-------
t 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULAR FIELD DATA
Plan t UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. MID-9
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJW .ALL. BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Condensate + 14 ml
Ambient Temp °F 85
Location Duct inlet
Box No. _
Meter Box No.
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.7
Assumed Moisture % 6
8-2-71
Probe Length
11'
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Operator Blessing
Probe Heater Setting 65
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
VI
y
i
I
• 1
1
Point
0
A -4
3
2
1
0
B-4
3
2
1
'
0
C-4
3
i 2
1
0
D-4
3
2
1
Avg .
Clock
lira
1810
!
1822
1828
1840
1845
1857
1902
1914
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
280.70 •
281.87
283.10
284.29
285.21
4.51
285.21
286.57
_
288.78
289.58
4.37
289.58
290.46
291.33
292.13
292.70
3.12
292.70
293.90
295.04
296.17
297.33
" 4. 6 3
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.58
0.58
0.51
0.60
0.32
0.52
0.70
0.70
0.70
0.45
0.22
0.55
0.43
0.43
0.40 ._
0.30
0.16
0.34
0.68
0.68
0.65
0.65
0.65
0.66
Orifice
in Ho
Desired
0.42
0.42
0.52
0.52
0.27
0.43
0.67
0.67
0.45
0.34
0.20
0.42
0.26
0.26
0,25
0.22
0.10
0.22
n.Afi
0.48
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.46
AH
0
Actual
-------
M1L .9 CONTINUED
Point
0
E-4
3
Clock
Tin:-
1917
2
1
1929
1
I
Avg. |
i
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
297.33
298.43
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.65
0.65
0.84
o.;o
301.66
4.33
0.78
0.72
20.96 0.56
!
'
\
< \
i
•
Orifice AH
in H^O
De-sired "
.• 0.42
0.42
0.58
0.44
0.50
0.49
Actual
0.42
0.42-
0.47
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
inlet r Outlet
100
101
102
0.37 102
0.30
0.39
103
102
0.41 | 0.37 j 97
1 •
1
95
95
96
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
14.5
19.0
25.0
Box
Tcrr.p.
°F
250
250
250
Iir.pinger
op
100
100
100
96 25.0 250 100 .
92
96
91
26.0
21.4
9.1
250 100
250
250
! 1 1
1
1 •
i
100.
95
StuCk
Press
in. !-in
Stack
Tcn-p
°F
700
730
! 730
810
850
764
i
'
.
bzy
»
i
V
Comments:
.NCAP-37- (12/67)
ho
00
-------
Fart 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. MID-10
Location No. 1 Duct Inlet
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Mo.
Meter Box No.
Condensate 8 ml
Ambient Temp °F 80
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.6
Assumed Moisture % 6
Dcte
8/3/71
Probe Length
11' plus
Hccter Box Setting,
°F
250
Operator Gonzalez
Probe Heater Setting 65
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
o
1
Ni
VO
• i
1
1
Point
0
A-l
A- 2
A-3
A-4
0
B-l
B-2
B-3
B-4
o
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
0
D-l
D-2
D-3
D-4
Clock
Tin:*
1006
1009
1012
1015
1018
1021
1024
1027
1030
1033
1038
1041
1044
1047
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
301.80
306.81
-
310.51
-
1050 313.60
1053
1057
1100
1103
1106
.
-
318.10
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.60
0.68
0.72
0.35
0.35
0.55
0.50
0.35
0.14
0.15
0.32
0.34
0.30
0.15
.0.14 _
0.70
0.72
0.52
Orifice AH.
in HoO
Desired "
0.49
0.58
0.59
0.30
0.30
0.42
0.39
0.27
0.12
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
0.49 1 80
0.58
84
0,59 ! 86
0.30
0.30
0.42
0.39
0.27
0.12
0.12 | 0.12
0.22
0.24
0.22
0.24
0.20 I 0.20
0.10
n in
0.45
0.52
0.10
n in
0.45
88
88
84
88
88
88
92
90
90
92
94
Ok
92
0.52 1 96
0.39 | 0.39
0.15 I 0.11 1 0.11
0.15
0.11
0.11
96
Outlet
80
82
82
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
2.5
4.0
4.0
82 ] 4.0
82
82
84
84
84
85
86
86
86
86
..86 ...
88
90
90
98 ' 90
98
I I
(CONTI1
1
JUED ON NE
XT PAGE)
90
4.0
4.0
5.0
5.0
3.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
3.5.
2.5
_? .5
6.0
7.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
Box
Tenp.
°F
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
Tcxp
°F
80
80
80
80
250 I 80
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
S" •> r- *r
lUs.lt
Press
in. fit;
0.1
0.1 .
Stack
Temp
°F
480
540
0.1 1 540
0.1 | 375
0.1 i 375
80 • I 0.1 ! 545
80 I 0.1
80
0.1
80 1 0.1
80 ! 0.1
80 t 0.1
80
80
80
•rf'n
0.1
0.1
0.1
n i
85 I 0.1
85
0.1
85 J 0.1
85
85
0.1
0.1
580
600
61.0 •
610
[ 670
710
815
810 !
800
760
640 .
740
580
580
i
i
-------
M4D-IO CQNT/NUeO
Point
0
E-l
E-2
Clock
Tiise
1110
1113
I 1116
I E-3 \ 1119
E-4
•
1122
\
!
j i
I 1
i 1
i
1
r
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
322.45
20.65
i
Pi tot
in. HgO
Ap
0.52
0.80
0.66
0.45
0.46
0.43
1-
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired "
0.38
0.48
0.41
0.28
0.28
0.31
'
Actual
0.38
0.49
0.41
Dry Gas Temp.
•F.
Inlet
94
96
98
0.28 ! 98
0.28
0.31
98
92
.
'
.
.
-
.
! •! 1 1 1 i
i
i
'
• -
i
i
i
i
Outlet
88
90
92
PCT?
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
<• . 6.0
10.0
9.5
94 1 8.0
94
90
..
.
8.0
5.0
Box
Terrp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
1
1 I.I
!
j
"
I
1
1
I
1
!
Ircpinger
Tcn:p
•°r
90
90
90
90
90
Stcck
Press
in. H«j
0.1
0.1
Stsck
Ten:?
°F
F680
805
0.1 1850
0.1 1875
0.1
1
85
.
0.1
'
t
•
1
.
875 1
655
»
i
'
i
*
'
t
i
Comments:
NCAP-37'02/67)
a
LJ
o
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. MlD-ll
Location No. 1 "Duct Inlet
Date 8/3/71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.AJ4 BLANKS
Read.and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Condensate + 7 ml
Ambient Temp °F
85
Bar; Press. "Hg 29.6
Assumed Moisture % 6
Probe Length
11'
Heater Box Setting,
°F
250
Operator Gonzalez
Prcbs Heater Setting 65
Probe Tip 01a., In. 3/16
c
1
u
1 1
1
' 1
( 1
' 1
Point
0
A-4
3
2
1
O
B-4
3
2
1
0
C-4
3
2
1
0
D-4
3
2
1
•
Clock
Tis:a
1400
1403
1406
1409
1412
1415
.1418
1421
1424
1427
1430
1433
1436
1439
1442
1457
1500
1503
1506
1509
Dry Gas
Keter, CF.
322.45
326.59
330.06
Pitot
in. H£0
AP
0.45
0.50
0.56
0.37
0.36
0.53
0.57
0.35
0.22
0.20
0.34
0.30
0.28
0.15
0.15 •
0.58
0.60
0.32
0.25
0.25
J
Orifice
in Ho
Desired
0.27
0.38
0.43 J
0.28
0.28
0.41
0.38
0.24
0.12
0.12
0.23
0.20
0.17
0.09
0.09
0.38
0.39
0.21
. 0.17
0.17
CONTINUED TO
AH
0
Actual
0.27
0.38
0.43
0.28
0.28
0.41
0.38
0.24
0.12
0.12
0.23
0.20
0.17
0.09
—Q.J3.9 .....
0.38
0.39
0.21
0.17
0.17
NEXT PAG1
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
86
88
90
90
92
92
94
94
94
94
94
96
96
96
96
94
94
94
94
96
]
Temp.
Outlet
86
88
88
88
88
88
88
88
90
90
90
90
90
90
90^
92
94
94
94
94
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
2.5
3.0
4.0
4.5
4.5
5.5
7.5
7.0
5.0
5.0
7.5
7.5
7.5
6.0
6.0
10.5
15.0
24.0
20.0
20.0
Box
Te.^p.
L °F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
2 SO
250 j
250
250
250
250
250
Irr.pinger
Texp
°F
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
•95
95
95
95
95
95
Stack
Press
in. He?
0.09
0.09 .
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0-09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
Stack
Ten-.?
or
480
490
490
500
500
500
655
600
6'70 .
660
660
650
690
710
710 i
710
7*00 .
690
595
560
• 1
1'
-------
MlO-M
• •
Paint
0
E-4
3
! 2
1
' AVR.
i
1
i
'
i
1
'
i
i
i
Clock
Tifi-,5!
1415
1 1418
1421
| 1424
1427
.
Dry Gas
Meter,. CF
340.38
17.93
•
Pi tot
in. P^O
AP
0.62
0.75
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.40
Orifice
in Hx,
DCS. i red
. 0.43
0.51
0.33
0.31
0.31
0.27
•
-
'
AH
0
Actual
0.43
0.51 '
0.33
0.30
0.30
0.27
•
Dry Gas
or
Inlet
96
96
96
96
96
95
.
Temp.
Outlet
94
94
94
94
94
90
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
23.0
24.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
,
>
Box
Tersp.
op
250
250
250
250
250
250
•
Ircpinger
Tc:;:p
o —
95
95
95
9i>
95
95
.
Stock
Press
in. Hr;
0.09
0.09
0.09
o.oy
0.09
0.09
Stack
Tc"?
°F
670
720
550
i/0
605 1
654
V
»
. 1
Comments:
.NCAP-37-02/67)
o
i
CO
-------
Irt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICL'L.,'fe FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test .point or, if single point
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No.
MID- 12
Location NO: i inlet Duct
i
o
s
1
1
• i
1
Dcte
Operate
Point
0
A-4
A-3
A-2
A-l
0
L B-4
B-3
B-2
B-l
0
8/4/71
* Gonzalez
Clock
Ttae
1048
1051
1054
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
340.92 .
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
0.40
0.48
0.58
1057 0.40
1100
344.78
1103
.1106
1109
1112
1115 348.50
1117
C-4 1120
C-!3
C-2
1123
-
1126
C-l | 1129 j 351.18
0
0.38
0.56
0.48
0.39
0.35
0.35 _J
0.32
0.30
0.25
0.14
sampling, read and. record every 5
minutes.
Ssaple Box No. 2
Meter Box No. 2
Probe Length il1 plus
Probe Heater Setting
Orifice
in Ho
Desired
0.35
0.34
0.42
0.29
0.28
0.42
0.36
0.28
0.26
0.26
0.23
0.21
0.17
0.13
0.12 0.11
1132 | - 0.56
D-4 1135
D-3
D-2
1138
1141
D-l 1144
0 1200
E-4
0.62
0.52
0.38
0.41
0.34
0.22 | 0.19
354.91 1 0.23
1203
1
0.50
0.20
0.30
0.65 | 0.47
i (Corvtl
AH
0
Actual
0.35
0.34
65
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet Outlet
80
82
0.42 j 82
80
82
82
Condensate
Ambient Te
Bar. Press
Assumed Mo
Heater Box
Probe Tip
Pum?
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
2.5
4.0
5.0
0.29 84 82 5.5
0.28 I 84
0.42
0.36
0.28
84
86
86
0.26 88
0.26 j 88
0.23
0.21
0.17
0..13
0.11
0.38
88
88
88
88
88
88
0.41 90
0.34 j 90
0.19
0.20
0.30
0..47
inued on
i
92
92
86
88
82 I 5.5
82 1 8.0
82 8.5
82
82
82
82
82
84
84
84
84
85
85
86
86
86
88
lext page!) ,
i
9.0
9.0
9.0
7.0
9.0
9.0.
9.0
8.5
15.0
20.0
25.0
Box
Temp.
OF
250
250
250
250
6 ml
mp °F 80
. "Kg 29.58
isture % 6
Setting, °F 250
Dia., In.
3/16
Ircpinger
Tcn:p
80
80
80
80
250 80
250
250
250
250
250
80 •
80
80
80
80
250 ) 80
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
19.0 i 250
19.0 J250
20.0
25.0
250
250
80
80
80
8JU
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
Stack
Press
in. Kg
0.08
0.08.
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
Stack
T£"?
°F
370
550
600
570
560
520
595
640
555 .
520
L600
625
655
330
325
670
715 •
735
.330
330
720
610
-------
MID- ri. eoN7/Nt>e0
Point
E-3
E-2
E-l
Clock
TiKS
[ 1206
1209
Dry Gas
Hster, CF
1212 358.94
18.02
1
u
!
.
i
i
Pi tot
in. HgO
Ap
0.78
0.56
0.50
0.42
i
. i
i
i
r
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
.0.57
0.46
0.41
0.31
Actual
0.57
0.46
0.41
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet Outlet
88
88
88
0.31 86
88
88
88
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
26.0
26.0
26.0
85
1
•
i
I
|
1
i
-
1
Box
Ternp.
op
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
Tcrp
°F
85
85
85
85
S*. , x-l.
uu<./>
Press
in. r!q
0.08
0.08
'Stock
Tern?
op
590
410
0.08 410
0.08 541
I
1
1
.
»
i
i
t
i
Comments:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
u
I
OJ
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
UC/RM - Marietta
Preliminary Traverse (ETE)
Location East Tapping Exhaust
Date 8/4/71
Operator Schroeder
STATIC PRESSURE •= .51
Clock
Time
1505
1515
AVG.
Point
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AP, in. H20
1.35 1.25
1.50 1.20
1.45 1.45
1.55 1.40
1.50 1.35
1.20 1.20
1.20 1.10
1.20 1.20
1.14 1.20
1.15 1,20
Stack
Temp., °F
90 99
95 99
98 99
99 99
99 99*
99 99
99 99
99 99
99 99
99 99
«
.
•
AVG.
1.30 ' 94
1.35 97
1.45 98
1.48 99
1.42 99
1.20 99
1.15 99
1.20 99
1.17 99
1.18 99
.1.29 98
/hP x (T+460J*
'
•
•
i
• j
*
i
i
.
-------
irt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULM/E FIELD DATA
PI ant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. ETE-IA
Location East Tapping Exhaust
Date 8/5/71
Ooarator ' Baxley
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test.point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. • 3_
Meter Box No. 2
(False Tap Run)
No Tapping
Ambient Temp °F
90
Ear. Press. "Hg 29.7
Assumed Moisture 2 3.4
Probe Length
H'41
Heater Cox Setting, °F 250
Probe Heater Setting 50
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
c
u.
(
• i
Point
Start
1
2
3 Off
3 On
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Clock
lira
1015
1018
1021
1028
1031
1034
1037
1040
1043
1046
1049
1052
1055
1058
1101
1104
1107
1110
1113
1116
1119
1120
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
360.43 -
362.70
364.14
366.80
369.00
370.56
373.50
375.63
377.80
380.70
382.30
384.55
387.25 ,
389.75
392.30
394.78
397.32
399.80
403.20
405.70
406.95
Pi tot
in. HgO
Ap
-
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.20
1.10
1.10
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
Orifice
in Ho
Desired
> - -
1.60
1.80
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.60
1.60
1.45
1.45
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
AH
0
Actual
1.60
1.80
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.60
1.60
1/45
1.45
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1.85
1..85
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
68
68
.
76
86
90
90
90
100
102
102
104
112
114
114
116
116
118
120
120
120
Temp.
Outlet
68
68
70
L 70
72
72
72
76
76
76
76
76
80
84
86
86
88
88
88
88
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
6.5
6.5
6.2
6.2
9..0
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
Box
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
Ta:p
°F
65
65
65
65 .
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
45
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
Stcck
Press
in. ric;
'
Stack
Ten:?
op
130
125
130
130
130
130
130 .
130
130
130
130
130
130
130
130 .
130
. 130
130
130
125
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
Plant
UC/RM - Marietta
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Run No. ETE-I
Location East Tapping Exhaust
D£te
8/5/71
Operator Baxley & Avery
Sessple Box No. 3
Meter Box No
Probe Length
Prcbs Heater
2
ll't
Setting
l"
50
Condensate +6 ml
Ambient Temp °F 90
Bar. Press. "Hg
29.7
Assumed Moisture % 3.4
Heater Cox Setting, CF 250
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
i
1
t
u
i
i
r
i
Point
Start
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
4
4
AVG.
i
1
Clock
TiTO
1130
1133
1136
1139
1142
1145
1148
1151
1154
1157
1200
1203
1206
1207
37
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
406.95
409.30
412.75
414.50
417.00
419.47
422.20 .
424.78
428.00
429.38
431.45
433.60
435.82
437.14
30.19
Pi tot
in. KgO
AP
1.30
1.30
1.30
1.40
1.40
1.30
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.40
L 1.40
1.40
1.28
Orifice
in H.
Desired
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.85
1.85
1.75
1.60
1.60
1,60
1.60
1.95
1.95
1.95
1.76
AH
0
Actual
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.85
1.85
1.75
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.95
1.95
1,95
1.76
.
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
104
108
108
112
114
114
118
122
122
122
122
120
120
116
Temp.
Outlet
90
92
92
90
90
90
92
92
92
94
94
92
92
92
Pum?
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
13.0
13.0
7.0
7.0
8.0
8..0
9.0
9.8
1
.
Box
Tcrr;p.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250 _,
250
250
250
250
250
Irr.pinger
Tcxp
°F
65
65
65
65
65.
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
i
65
Stcck
Press
in. rig
Stack
TG-P
°F
100
100
105
105
105
105
105
105 .
105
110
115
115
115
:
107
>
!
i
-------
Hart !U, p. 4 Of 8
PARTICUL/1' FIELD DATA
Plant
'UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. ETE-2
Location East Tapping Exhaust
Date 8/5/71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL JN. All BLANKS
Read and record at the start of-each
test point or, If single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Condensate +8 ml
Ambient Temp *F 90
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.7
Assumed Moisture % 3.4
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Operator Baxley & Avery
Probe Heater Setting 50
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
Point
Start
1
2
3
4
Clock
Tir^
1430
1433
1436
1439
1442
5 | 1445
6
7
.1448 '
1451
8 j 1454
, 9
10
1457
1501
1
j AVG.
I
1
31
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
437.23
439.58
441.22
443.65
446.11
448.55
450.76
453.00
455.02
457.10
459.88
22.65
1
i
1
1
!
Pi tot
in. K20
1.20
1.30
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.20
1.10
1.10
1.05
1.24
|.
Orifice. AH
in HoO
Desired
1.70 .
1.85
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.70
1.70
1.60
1.60
1.50
1.76
Actual
1.70
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
80
1.85 ! 86
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.70
1.70
1.60
1.60
90
96
98
102
110
112 j
114
1.50 116
1
1.76
1 .
1
1
1
100
Outlet
80
80
80
80
82
82
84
84
84
86
82
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
6.2
6.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
5.2
5.2
5.0
5.0
5.0
5,9
BOX
To^p.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Ircpinger
V
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
1 ,''
1
-------
irt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUL i FIELD DATA
Plant
UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. ETE-3
Location East Tapping Exhaust
Date 8/5/71
Operator ' Avery & Baxley
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL JN.. ALL. BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
tes.t point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. 3_
Meter Box No. 2
Condensate +4 ml
Ambient Temp °F 90
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.7
Assumed Moisture % 3.4
Probe Length ll'4"
Heater Cox Setting, er 250
Probe Heater Setting 50
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
1
r
it
u
^
i
• i
Point
Start
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AVG.
Clock
TiKS
1602
1605
1608
1611
1614
1617
.1620
1623
1626
1629
1632
30
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
459.88 .
461.96
464.18
466.58
468.74
471.15
473.30
475.50
477.64
479.70
481.77
21.89
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
1.20
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.20
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.22
1
Orifice
in H.
Desired ~
1.70
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.85
1.70
1.70
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.74
'
AH
0
Actual
1.70
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.85
1.70
1.70
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.74
.
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
85
85
88
90
100
110
110
110
116
120
120
103
•
Temp .
Outlet
85
85
86
90
90
92
92
92
94
92
90
.
90
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
5.0
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
Box
Tc.^p.
op
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250^
250
250
Irr.pinger
Tcn:p
°F
65
/ 65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
• '.
$*• - /•>,
l_U-_/S
Press
in. h'g
.
Stack
Tc-p
°F
100
100
100
100
95
95
95
95
•95 .
95
95
97
f
!
k
I
i
i
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
UC/RM - Marietta
Preliminary Traverse (WTE)
Location West Tapping Exhaust
Date 8/4/71
Operator Schroeder
STATIC = -0.44 in. H20
Clock
T i me
1440
1500
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AVG.
AP, in. H20
1.05 0.76
0.83 0.75
0.86 0.55
0.78 0.86
1.00 0.84
1.20 1.25
1.10 1.10
1.20 1.20
1.40 1.40
1.60 1.60
Stack
Temp., °F
110 110
110 110
115 110
115 110
115 110
115 110
119 110
119 115
119 115
119 119
«
Avg. 0.90
0.79
0.70
" 0.82
• " 0.92
•1.22
1.1
" ' 1.2
1.4
1.6
1.06
110
110
112
112
112
112
115
115
115
. H9
113
I
•V x (Tracer;
;
i
i
1
',
t
- i
i
t
i
t
i
i
i
i
i
I
i
i
!
1 • • • t
•**
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Consents:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
D-40
-------
RESOTTRCES RESEARCHA INC,
PAGE 1 OF 2
Personnel
Baxley
Plant Conditions, etc..
PI an t ' UC/RM - Mar ietta
Entered_
Checked
Pate 8/4/71
Sample Location^
WTE - Moisture Determination
r Time
1443
1453
1503
1513
AVG
,.
Sample
Number
Meter #_ L HAS MKTER CONDITIONS Pi«f.r *
Cu.Ft,
Reading
585.40
597.10
608.10
618.10
32.70
Cu.Pt.(Vm)
Difference
Elapss
Min.
10
10
10
30
.
(Km)
C.F.M.
(-J460=Ttn)
'etnp °P
68
70
74
74
72
I^Q
Condensate,ml (Vw) 5 ml
°P+460=T8
°R
Estimated Rm(Corrected)
Calculated Rjn(Corrected)_
Sample Nozzle Dla,,In.(d)_
% Moiattrre of Gas
29.6
Avg.Gas Velocity,fpm(Vsx60)_
Vs=(2.9 xF.) x xTS" 3t Vf"
S • ~
or
2.46
D-41
-------
PAGE 2 OF 2
WTE- 4
TRIAL MOISTURE CALCULATIONS
1. Isokinetic Sampling (Dry Gas) (cfm)
2
1^ - .33 x Tm x Vg x d x PS : Rm (corrected) = Rm x Me
TS Pb - Pm
t
Estimated Value:
Calculated Value:
2. Water Vapor Volume (cu. ft.)
Vv «= .00267 X YW x ?"* .00267 x -5 x 532. = 0.329
^b - pva 27<6
3. Condensate Correction for Meter Rate
MC ° Vm 32.70 _ 32.70
Vm •!- Vv 32.70 32.37
Moisture in Metered Gas (cu. ft.)
IL. e V.P. x Vn .522 x 32.70 = 79
p _ p 21.6
o m
5. Percent Moisture (%) Stack Gas .
% Moisture = vv * '^V x 100 .33 + .79
1.12
vv * Vm .33 + 32.70 ~ 55^3 =3.38
Saturated at % . ' - 'n-42
-------
10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULrtfE FIELD DATA
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No. WTE-IA
Location West Tapping Exhaust
Dcte 8/5/71
Operator ' Schroeder & Hall
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test'point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
(False Tap Run)
No Tapping '
Ambient Temp °F . 70
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.60
Assumed Moisture % 3.4
Probo Length
11'
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Probe Heater Setting 60
Probe Tip Oia., In. 3/16
*
M
Point
Start
1
Clock
Tis:s
1045
2 | *
3 1
4
5 I
6
7
8
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
865.12 •
867.20
9 I 884.40
10
888.60
7 1
7
1120 903.78
1
1
!
I
1
r
"
Pitot
in. H20
AP
1.15
1.10
1.10
0.90
[ 0.87
0.98
1.20
1.25
1.25
1.30
1.20
1.20
Orifice AH
in mo
Desired
1.45
1.40
1.40
1.15
1.10
1.25
1.50
Actual
1.45
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet
73
75
1.40 75
1.40 i 84
1.15
1.10
1.25
1.50
1.55 J 1.55
1.55
2.65
1.50
1.50
1.55
90
93
98
103
106
111
2.65 i 114
1.50
1.50
1
120
120
3 min. pe)|_j>oint extept 7
* Stopped j 5 min.
i
1
I
'
t
Outlet
70
72
72
73
75
75
76
77
80
83
86
93
95'
Pump
Vacuum
Tn ua
* 1 1 • * ' j
Gouge
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.5
1.75
1.75
Box
Torsp.
°F
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
2.0 j 200
1.5 1 200
1.5
200
_i
f
Ircpinger
Temp
°F
S*. .. -I.
i.CCi^
Press
in. no,
Stack
TC.TP
or
65
\ 81
1 90
•
90
90
90
90
90
90
1 90
• j
85
90
V
'•
-------
10, p. 4 of 8
PARTI Cl
FIELD DATA
Plant
UC/RM - Marietta
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJ^.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No. WTE-I
Location West Tapping Exhaust
D^te 8/5/71
Schroeder
Box No.
Meter Box No. •_
Probe Length
Condensate -12 ml
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
70
29.60
Assumed Moisture % 3.4
11'
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Probe Heater Setting 60
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
Point
Start
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
{ 7
I
i AVG.
i
i
i
Clock
Tin:*
1130
1200
1207
37
1
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
903.78
,
926.55
22.77
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
1.20
1.20
0.85
1.00
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.10
1.10
1.15
1.10
-
1.05
'
Orifice
in H*.
Desired
1.50
1.50
1.15
1.25
1.20
1.23
1.25
1.40
1.40
1.45
1.40
1.34
.
AH
0
Actual
1.50
1.50
1.15
1.25
1.20
1.23
1.25
1.40
1.40
1.45
1.40
1.34
Dry Cos
°F
Inlet
107
109
112
115
116
118
119
121
122
123
L 123
116
Temp.
Outlet
93
94
94
96
96
94
95
95
96
95
95
95
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.5
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.4
BOX
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
1
Impinger
Temp
°F
.
/
•
Stack
Press
in. Hg
•
-
Stack
T£~P
°F
77
95
105
120 1
126
120
118
115
115
115
118
111 |
!
.
V
(
J
I
1
-------
rart 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run No.
WTE-2
Location West Tapping Exhaust
Date
8/5/71
Operator Schroeder
Point
[ Start
Clock
1430
Dry Ga'S
Meter, CF
.926.45
1 i
2
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
1.20
1.20
3 1.10
4
1 5
6
7
0.95
0.89
0.90
0.95
8 ! I 0.87
9 0.85
10
AVG.
1500
30
944.36 0.90
17.91
i
(
0.98
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. 2
Heter Box No. 4
Probe Length 11'
Probe Heater Setting 60
Orifice
in H/-
Desired "
1.50
1.50
1.40
1.25
1.15
1.15
1.25
1.15
1.10
1.15
1.26
AH
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
Inlet
1.50 86
Outlet
84
1.50 ! 91 84
Condensate
Ambient Te
Bar. Press
Assumed Mo
Heater Box
Probe Tip
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
4.0
4.0
1.40 98 | 85 4.0
1.25
1.15
1.15
105
105
110
1.25 112
1.15 118
1.10
1.15
1.26
120
120
106
1
i
85
85
87
89
90
91
90
87
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3,7
Box
Temp.
°F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
I i
• ! i
i i
!
j
|
i !
i i
-2 ml
mp °F 75
. "Hg 29.60
isture % 3.4
Setting, °F 250
Dia., In.
Ircpinger
Temp
°F
3/16
Stack
Press
in. Kg
Stack
Te-p
op
105
115
125
128
125
120
115
112 .
110
i
i
1
1 . .
i
I
i
!
i
i
!
i
L 108
115
I
I
-------
rart 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT -
BLANKS
Plant
Run No.
Location
Dcte
Operator '
UC/RM - Marietta
WTE-3
West Tapping Exhaust
8/5/71
Schroeder
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and. record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Condensate +2 ml
Ambient Temp °F 70
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.60
Assumed Moisture % 3.4
11'
Heater Dox Setting, °F 250
Prcbe Heater Setting 60
Probe Tip Dia., In. 3/16
a
£•
'
)
f
Point
Start
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
'
AVG.
Clock
Tir:;o
1604
•
1634
30
Dry Gas
Kster, CF.
944.36
962.99
18.63
•
Pi tot
in. K20
AP
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
0.97
0.95
1.00
1.10
1.10
1.20
1.05
Orifice
in H/-
Desired
1.30
1.30
1.30
1.30
1.25
1.25
1.28
1.40
1.40
1.50
1.33
AH
0
Actual
1.30'
1.30
1.30
1.30
1.25
1.25
1.28
1.40
1.40
1.50
1.33
.
.
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
96
99 -
104
106
111
113
117
119
121
120
110
Temp.
Outlet
90
90
90
91
92
92
93
95
95
96
92
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.2
1.8
Box
Temp.
L °F
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
Impinger
To:p
°F
•I
$•*• -fif
Lti»_K
Press
in. Kg
Stack
Ten:?
°F
85
85
117
117
115
113
112
1]>2
lUb
1UD
1U7
|
!
>
--
-------
RESOURCES, RESEARCH^ INC,
Personnel
Entered_
Checked
Plant Conditions, etes Metals Run
Plant _-'• UC/RM -Marietta
Date 8-1-71
Sample Location,
M1E - 6M
APCO Sample Box #4
, Time
1100
1110
1120
1130
1140
1150; .
1200
1210
1220
, 1230
1240
1245
Sample
Number
M1E-6
Meter $_
Cu.Ft.
Reading
289.55
365.92
76.37
GAS METER CONDTTTHWR P,,«>p #
Cu.Ft.(Vm)
Difference
-
-
Slaps*
Min.
10
10
10
10
10
•
(Km)
C.F.M.
-
(4460=Tm)
Temp °F
76
76
78
84
98
100
100
100
-------
10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
Plant UC/BM - Marietta
Run NO. M1E- 7 Metal Test
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read, and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
SCT.pl e Box Mo.
Condensate +240 ml
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg
Taken along with MLE-7 Particulate
Location Test f-tetar Box No.
Assumed Moisture %
Dste
8-1-71
Probe Length
Operator
Prcba Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F_
Probe Tip Dia., In.
c
*•
IX
•
1
Point
3 feet
from
edge
•
Clock
Tirr.s
1525
1535
1545
1555
1605
1615
1.625
1635
16'45
1655
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
374.96
453.71
78.75
Pi tot
in. HgO
A?
•
Orifice
in Hn
Desired
•
"
AH
0
Actual
.
f
-
.
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
'
Temp.
Outlet
80
82
86
90
92
86
86
86
86
86
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
3.5
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.6
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.2
.._..
Box
Temp.
°F
Impinger
Temp
°F
75 •
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
j
•
Stack
Press
in. He;
Stack
T£"?
°F
i
\
I
h
i
-------
Irt 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICUU,-E FIELD DATA
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Run NO. M1E-12 Metal
Location Exhaust"
D£te 8-4-71
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. •_
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg 29.5
Assumed Moisture %
Operator Blessing
Probe Heater Setting 90
Heater Box Setting, °F 250
Probo Tip Oia., In. -
n
i
_
!
Point
Clock
Tin:-
1411
1450
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
573.87 '
619.82
Pitot
in. H20
AP
Orifice
in Hn
Desired
AH
0
Actual
Dry Gas
or
Inlet
.
Temp.
Outlet
66
82
.
Pumo
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
7.0
11.4
Box
Temp.
L °F
Ircpinger
Temp
°F
.'
• ;'
S* ""''
Press
in. l-ig
•
Stack
Temp
°F
>
i
:
i
l
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCHt INC,
Personnel Avery & Baxley
Entered,
Checked
Plant Conditions, etcs Metals Run
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Date 8/5/71
Sample Location,
East Tap Exhaust
, Time
1015
1022 -Po
1027 -Po
1040
1054
1105
1115 '•
1120
1130
1140
1150
1200
1206
Sample
Number
ETE-1A
er Off
er On
ETE-1
Meter # GAS MHTER nONTiTTTOWS ftm,p #
Cu.Ft.
Reading
783.46
790.37
790.37
807.44
823.73
837.93
850.20
859.14
859.14
872.40
883 .80
900.30
908.51
Cu*Ft,(Vm)
Difference
FALSE '
ElapSv
Min.
0
7
13
14
11
10
5
'AP RUN
0
10
10
10
6
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(-l460=TTa)
Temp °F
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
67
68
68
(Hn)
Vacuum"Hg
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.3
5.0
5.0
4.8
4.8
4.9
5.5
5.8
5.9
5.9
130
130
130
130
105
105
105
105
105
Thimble
Number
D-50
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH.
Personnel Avery & Baxley
Entered_
Checked
Plant Conditions, etc.. Metals Run
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Date
8/5/71
Sample Location East Tap Exhaust 2
( Time
1430
1440
1450
1500
,
Sample
Number
ETE-2
Meter # GAS METER CONDITIONS Putw #
Cu.Ft,
Reading
908.52
921.84
934.12
949.29
Cu.Pt,(Vm)
Difference
ElapSv
Min.
0
10
10
10
«
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(4460=Tm)
Temp °F
75
75
74
74
(Hn)
Vacuuming
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.2
Stack
Temp.
105
105
105
105
Thimble
Number
D-51
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH> INC,
Personnel Schroeder
Entered,
Checked
Plant Conditions, etc> Metals Runs
Plant. UC/RM - Marietta '
Date 8/5/71
Sample Location West Tapping Exhaust
f Time
1610
1640
Sample
Number
WTE-3
Meter # ^ ___ _ GAS METER CONDITIONS PunTO #-. „
Cu.Ft.
Reading
34.83
77.02
Cu.Pt.(Vm)
Difference
ElapSv
Min.
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(4460=Tm)
Temp °F
80
8.0
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCHt INC,
Personnel Gonzalez & Baxley
Entered
Checked
Plant Conditions, etc- SOo
Plant U/C - RM - Marietta
Date 7/27/71
Sample Location S0? . - IE
, Time
1505
1515
1525
1535
1545
1555
1605
1615
1625
, 1635
1645
1655
1705
1715
1725
AVG.
Sample
Number
so2-i
Meter #_ ._ ^ GAS METER CONDTTTfWS ftmp *
Cu.Ft.
Reading
030.61
062.25
31.64
Cu.Ft.(Vm)
Difference
Elapss
Min.
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
140
(Rm)
C.F.K.
(+460=Tra)
Temp °F
78
78
78
76
76
76
76
74
74
74
72
72
72
72
72
75
(Hn)
Vacuum"Ife
5.5
5.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Imp.
Temp.
70 As
Thimble
Number
umed
D-53
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH^ INC,
Personnel Gonzalez & Baxley
Entered,
Checked
Plant Conditions, etcs ' S03
Plant ' UC/RM - Marietta
Date 7/29/71
Sample Location Exhaust SO -2E
sJEias— -
1015
1025
1035
1045
1055
1105
1115
1125
1135
1145
1155
1205
1215
AVG.
Sample
Number
Meter #_
Gu.Ft,
Reading
65.30
66.00
68.00
72.28
6.98
Power v
GAS MFTR* rnimrrTfWS P,,v*?#
Cu.Ft.(Vm)
Difference
ent off and
Elapss
Min.
-
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
n 3 time
(RnO
C.F.M.
during
(+460=Tm)
Temp °F
66
66
66
66
68
68
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
68
his test.
<»n)
Vacuum"H£
2.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.9
Thimble
Number
D- 54
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH> INC,
Personnel Gonzalez & Baxley
Entered
Checked
Plant Conditions3 etc..
Plant UC/RM..-.Marietta.
SO.
Date
7/30/71
Sample Location MlE-3 Exhaust
S02-3E
r Time
1815
1825
1835
1845
1855
1905
1915
1925 .
1935
,1945
AVG.
Sample
Number
MlE-3
Meter # GAS METEP rnrmTTTft^fi *,11W #.
Cu.Ft.
Reading
072.28
82.60
Cu.Pt.(Vm)
Difference
Elapss
Min.
_
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
90
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(+460=Tm)
Temp °F
64
64
64
66
66
66
66
66
66
66
(Rn)
Vacuum"!fe
3.2
3.2
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.0
Imp.
Temp .
60 As
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
Thimble
Number
sumed
-
D>55
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH.. INC,
Personnel Gonzalez
Entered,
Checked
Plant Conditions, etc- '
Plant UC/RM - Marietta
Date
7-31-71
Sample Location
M1E-4 S02 - 4E
r Time
0940
0950
1000
1010
1020
. 1030
1040
}.050
1100
, 1110
1120
1130
1140
Sample
Number
M1E-4
S02
Meter # GAS METER CONDTTT^NS Pimp # ,
Cu.Pt.
Reading
082.95
093.95
11:00
Cu,Ft.(Vm)
Difference
Elaps..
Min.
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
.10
10
120
(Rm)
C.F.M.
-
(+460=Tra)
Temp °F
70
70
72
74
76
76
76
76
78
78
80
80
80
(Rn)
Vacuum"Pfe
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.2
4.2
4.2
IMP.
60
60
Thimble
Number
D-56
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH^ INC,.
Personnel Gonzalez
Entered,
Checked
Plant Conditions, etCs S02
Plant UC/RM ~ Marietta
Date 7-31-71
Sample Location
S02 - E5
M1E-5
. Time
1440
1450
1500
1510
1520
1530
1540
1550
1600
. 1610
1620
1630
Sample
Number
ttE-5
so2
Water # GAS METER CONDITIONS Purrm *
Cu.Pt.
Reading
275.29
284.91
9.62
Cu.Ft.(Vm)
Difference
ElspSs
Min.
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
110
t
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(+460=Tra)
Temp °F
86
86
86
88
88
88
90
90
90
88
88
88
88
(Bn)
Vacuum"HK
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
IMP
70
Thimble
Number
D-57
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH„ INC,
Personnel
Schroeder
Entered_
Checked
Plant Conditions, etCn__
Plant UC/RM Exhaust
Date
8-2-71
Sample Location,
M1E -8 SC-2
, Time
0920
0940
1010
1030
1050
1110
.
Sample
Number
M1E-8
so2
Meter # _ GAS METER CONDITIONS Pump #_ ~.
CuJPt.
Reading
458.10
465.07
Cu.Pt.(Vm)
Difference
Elaps s
Min.
.
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(-f460=Ttn)
Temp °F
70
75
79
82
84
84
(Bn)
VacuuuinHg
2.0
2.8
2.8
2.2
2.2
2.0
Thimble
Number
D-58
-
-------
Plant Conditions,
Plant. UC/RM - Marietta
RESOURCES RESEARCH^ INC,
Personnel
Schroeder
Entered.
Checked
SO?
Date 8-2-71
Sample Location Exhaust M1E-9 S02
^ Time
1730
1805
1850
1917
1942
1952
,
Sample
Number
Meter # GAS METER CONDITIONS Pv«r #-
Cu.Ft,
Reading
466.08
473.61
479.57
482.96
488.84
490.78
Cu.Ft.(Vm)
Difference
Elapsv
Min.
t
(Km)
C.F.M.
(-»460=Tta)
Temp °F
78
79
84
82
82
80
(Rn)
Vacuum"Hg
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.8
— —
Thimble
Number
D-59
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH,. INC,
Plant Conditions,
Plant UC/RM -
Sample Location
' Personnel Blessing
etc. S02
Marietta Date
M1E-10 S02
Entered
Checked
8-3-71
. Time
0957
1025
1055
1130
Sample
Number
Meter # GAS METER CONDITIONS Pump #-
Cu.Ft,
Reading_
497.91
499.92
501.00
501.60
Cu,Ft.(Vm)
Difference
Elapsv
Min.
, .
(Rm)
C.F.M.
(+460=Tra)
Temp °F
66
68
69
68
(Hn)
VacuumnHe
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
Thimble
Number
Dff\
-ou
-------
RESOURCES RESEARCH> INC,
Personnel Schroeder & Avery
Entered.
Checked
Plant Conditions, etc.. SO? Field Data
Plant UC/RM - j-iarie'tta
Date 8/5/71
Sample Location_
Tapping Exhausts
f Time
1128
1140
1207
1430
1500
1607
1620
1630
1635
Sample
Number
WTE-1
WTE-2
ETE-3
Meter # GAS METER nOTTOTTTONS T^y, #. r
Cu.Ft,
JReading__
28.40
30.50
32.35
32.38
34.83
962.77
963.16
963.55
963.77
Cu.Ft.(Vm)
Difference
ElapSv
Min.
(Rm)
C.P.Mv
(-f460=Tn>)
Temp °P
73
76
77
78
79
75
75
75
75
(Bn)
Vacuu-m"Hg
3.0
2.5
2.0
2.5
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.2
Pb
29.60
29.60
29.60
29.60
29.60
29.60
29.60
29.60
29.60
Thimble
Number
-
D-.61
-------
Part lu, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location_ MIE-I
Date
Time
7/27/71
With Particulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
M1E-IA
MlE-lB
AVG.
•
(co2)
Reading 1
2.1
2.1
2.1 . .
«
(02)
Reading 2
19.2
19.3
19.2
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil • •
Nil'
Nil
NCAP-31 (12/G7)
D- 62
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location^ MiE-2
Date
Time
7/29/71
With Particulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
M1E-2A
MIE-2B
MIE-2C
AVG.
(co2)
Reading 1
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.4
«
(02)
Reading 2
18.4
18.2
18.2
18.3
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
NCL'\P-31 (12/07)
D-63
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location MiE-3
Date
Time
7/30/71
With Particulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
- M1E-3A
M1E-3B
AVG.
(co2)
Reading 1
1.9
1.9
1.9
#
(o2)
Reading 2
18.6
. 18.6
18.6
•
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil ' "
Nil
Nil
NCAP-31 (12/67)
D- 64
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Exhaust M1E-4
Date 7/31/71
Time
With Particulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
M1E-4A
M1E-4B
AVG.
•
(co2)
Reading 1
2.8
2.8
2.8
•
4
•
(o2)
Reading 2
18.8
18.8
18.8
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil
Nil
Nil
NCAP-31 (1P./G7)
D-65
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Exhaust M1E-5
Date 7-31-71
Time With Particulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
M1E- 5A
- 5B
(co2)
Reading 1
3.2
3.4
3.3
(02)
Reading 2
18.5
18.3
18.4
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil
it
it
NCAP-31 (12/67)
D-66
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location_
Date
Time
M1E- 7
8-1-71
With Partic.ulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
M1E - 7A
- 7B
AVG.
(co2)
Reading 1
3.0 .
3.0
3.0
(o2)
Reading 2
18.6
18.6
1.8.6,
.
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil
Nil
Nil
NC<\P-3) (12/67)
D-67
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Locatlon UP/KM - Marietta
Date_
Time
Scrubber Exhaust
8-2-71
D945 - 1100.
Operator Schroeder
Comments:
Test
M1E- 8
-
-
(co2)
Reading 1
3.2
3.2
3.2
*
(o2)
Reading 2
21.7
21.8
2.1.8
(CO)
Reading 3
Negligible
ti
ii
NCAP-31 (12/07)
D-68
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Scrubber Exhaust
Date 8-2-71
Time
6.15 - 8:15
Operator Schroeder
Comments;
Test
M1E- 9 A
-9B
Avg.
(co2)
Reading 1
3.4 .
3.4
3.4
(02)
Reading 2
18.5
18.5
18.5
(CO)
Reading 3
Negligible
ii
ti
NCAP-31 (12/07)
D-69
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Scrubber Exhaust
Date
UC/RM - Marietta
8-3-71
Time 1010-1110
Operator Blessing
Comments:
Test
M1E-10-A
-B
AVG.
(co2)
Reading 1
3.2 -
3.2
3.2
. • .
(o2)
Reading 2
22.0
22. '0
22.0
•
(CO)
Reading 3
w
•>
Nil
Nd\P-31 (12/G7)
D-70
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Exhaust M1E-11
Date 8-3-71
Time 1400 - 1530
Operator Blessing and Avery
Comments:
Test
M1E-11A
•B
AVG.
(co2)
Reading 1
3.2
3.2
3.2
(o2)
Reading 2
18.6
18.6
18.6
(CO)
Reading 3
-
-
Nil
NCL'\P-31 (12/67)
D-71
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location Scrubber Exhaust
Date 8/4/71
Time
With?articulate
Operator Gonzalez
Comments:
Test
M1E - 12
(co2)
Reading 1
3.1
, ' *
(02)
Reading 2
18.7
'
- .
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil
•
NCAP-31 (12/G7)
D- 72
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location WTE-I Comments:
Date 8/5/71
Time With Particular^
Operator Schroeder .
Test
WTE-1
(C02)
Reading 1
0.2
(o2)
Reading 2
21.2
... ..
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil ' '
NOVP-31 (12/67)
D-73
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location WTE-Z
Date
Time
8/5/71
With Particulate
Operator Schroeder
Comments:
Test
WTE-2
-
(co2)
Reading 1
0.1
. .
.
(o2)
Reading 2
20.9
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil •,• '
NC/VP-31 (12/G7)
D-74
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location WTE-3
Date - 8-5-71
Time During particulate
Operator Schroeder
Comments:
Test
WTE-3A
-3B
AVG
(co2)
Reading 1
0.1
0.1
0.1 .
(o2)
Reading 2
21.2
21.2
21.2
(CO)
Reading 3
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nd\P~31 (12/67)
D-75
-------
APPENDIX E
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
-------
APPENDIX E-l
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
PARTICULATE SAMPLING
With an unstable plant operation a trial run is often conducted. If
the trial turns out to be satisfactory it may be considered a part of the
final testing. Preliminary data is obtained for gas velocity, temperature,
moisture content and other variables which might affect the isokinetic
sampling rate. Each sample port traverse is divided into a number of
equal areas for each location. Each test run is designed to obtain simul-
taneous samples at each location, for such a period of time that plant
operation will be representative, and that sufficient material will have
been obtained for accurate analysis.
Particulate samples are obtained using the equipment and test
procedures as stipulated in "Sample Collection Procedures," published
by GAP. The sampling train is basically the same as that designed
.by the Control Development Program of CAP (formerly the Air Pollution
Control Office), "Gas Stack Sampling Improved and Simplified with
New Equipment," and described in Paper No. 67-119, presented at the
Air Pollution Control Association meeting at Cleveland, Ohio, in June,
1967.
The above sample equipment is referred to in this report as the
EPA train. It is essentially the same as that recently described in
Federal Register, Volume 36, Number 159, August 17, 1971, Part II as
Test Method 5. Its operation, briefly, is as follows:
l-l
-------
determined by using the nomographs presented in APCA Paper No. 67-119.
This nomograph relates stack gas velocity, temperature, and moisture
content to the flow rate required for isokinetic sampling.
The ASME train, run in parallel with the EPA train, consists of a
stainless steel filter holder containing a pre-weighed alundum filter.
Its operation, briefly, is as follows:
Sample gases are drawn through a stainless steel nozzle and filter
holder, placed within the stack, into a set of water filled Greenburg-
Smith impingers. Isokinetic sampling rates are not determined during
the test but are precalculated from initial pitot and temperature
readings. Only the material collected by the alundum filter is normally
considered as particulate. No ASME train was employed during this survey.
SULFUR DIOXIDE SAMPLING
Sulfur dioxide emission tests are normally conducted at the same
location as the exhaust particulate tests. Sample gas is drawn through
a glass wool filter into an electrically heated glass probe, followed
by a coarse frit midget impinger and a second glass wool filter. The
filter leads to three midget impingers in an ice bath, followed in turn
by a silica gel tube drier, vacuum gauge, dry gas meter and vacuum pump.
The midget bubbler contains 15 milliliters of 80 percent isopropyl
alcohol. The first two impingers contain 15 milliliters of three percent
hydrogen peroxide solution and the third is operated dry. Equipment is
leak tested before each run. The three percent hydrogen peroxide is
prepared the day of the test by dilluting 10 milliliters of 30 percent
reagent grade hydrogen peroxide with 90 milliliters of distilled water.
-------
Temperatures, vacuum and gas meter readings are taken and tabulated
in order to calculate standard volumes. After sampling, the train is
purged with clean air in order to carry over any SO. trapped in the
isopropyl alcohol. ,
NITROGEN OXIDES SAMPLING
Nitrogen oxides sampling is normally carried out at the same exhaust
location as the sulfur dioxide and particulate tests. The sample gas is
pulled through a glass wool filter and a glass probe into an evacuated
two-liter flask containing dilute sulfuric acid-hydrogen peroxide solution.
This is prepared according to EPA directions for nitrogen oxides sampling.
The flask is fitted with a three-way stopcock and a pump is employed to
evacuate the flask and purge the probe lines. Vacuum present in the flask
is measured by a vacuum gauge and the sampling train is leak tested by
pulling a vacuum of 27 inches Hg and observing the pressure gauge. Initial
and final.readings of pressure, flask temperature and atmospheric pressure
are recorded after the probe is purged. After collecting the sample the
flask is sealed and shaken for 5 minutes, then allowed to stand overnight,
before being washed into sample containers for transfer to the laboratory.
ORSAT SAMPLING
•
An integrated gas sample is obtained with a mylar bag and a peristaltic
pump with adjustable flow rate. The gases are filtered and cooled prior to
reaching an all plastic and glass flow meter where the sampling rate is
monitored. Gas samples are taken during the same period during which veloc-
ities, temperatures, and particulate samples are obtained. Analyses are per-
formed at the site immediately after each sample is collected.
E-4
-------
APPENDIX E.2
CLEANUP AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
CLEANUP (EPA PARTICULATE TRAIN)
Probe, Nozzle, Cyclone, and Front Half of Filter Holder
The nozzle, probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of the filter
holder are washed with reagent grade acetone, the washings collected
in a container and transported to the laboratory for analysis. A
brush and/or rubber policeman is used with the acetone to remove any
particles adhering to the cyclone walls or the flask. The reagent
acetone used for washing is tested to determine the blank or residue
upon evaporation.
Filter
The tared circular MSA type 1106BH filter paper is carefully
removed from the fritted glass support and transferred to a glass
petri dish for later weighing.
Impingers
Water in the first three impingers (the original water plus the .
condensate) is measured, then emptied into a polyethylene container.
The impingers are then water washed and the washings combined with the
condensate and original water.
Acetone Train Wash
The rear half of the filter holder, including the fritted glass
support, the impingers, and impinger connections up to but excluding the
E-5
-------
fourth impinger, are washed with acetone. These washings are collected
in a polyethylene (since changed to glass) bottle and sealed for later
analysis.
Silica Gel
Silica gel is transferred (dry) from the fourth impinger to an air-
tight container and sealed. The impinger is then washed with acetone, the
acetone being discarded because it contains fine silica gel particles.
CLEANUP (S02 TRAIN)
The impinger containing 80 percent isopropyl alcohol is discarded and
the impingers containing three percent hydrogen peroxide are saved. These
latter impingers contain SC^ gas in the form of H^SO^. A glass jar is used
as a sample container for transportation to the laboratory.
CLEANUP (NOX TRAIN)
After storage overnight and shaking for another two minutes the con-
tents are rinsed into glass containers for shipment to the laboratory.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES (EPA PARTICULATE TRAIN)
Acetone Washings
The acetone washings from the nozzle, probe, cyclone, flask, and filter
front; from the fritted glass, filter back and impinger train; are analyzed
separately by evaporation and drying at .ambient temperatures.
Filter Particulate
The filter and particulate collected thereon are dried for 24 hours in
a desiccator at ambient temperature and weighed. Tare weight of the filter
is then deducted.
E-6
-------
Impinger Water
Water collected in the impingers, along with the water washings of the
impingers, is extracted with ether and chloroform. The extracts are trans-
ferred to a tared dish and evaporated to dryness at room temperature. After
extraction, the remaining water and solvent are evaporated to dryness on a
steam bath and this additional net weight is added to the total weight of
participate matter.
SPECIAL NOTE
All samples are now dried in 250 ml beakers to a constant weight.
ANALYSIS (ORSAT MEASUREMENTS)
Orsat measurements for determination of carbon dioxide, oxygen and
carbon monoxide are made using a Burrell Industrial Gas Analyzer or
equivalent. -
ANALYSIS (S02 TRAIN)
S02 samples are analyzed by the modified Shell Development method.
Barium perchlorate is used instead of barium chloride (as in the new EPA
source testing Method 6) because of the sharper titration end point obtain-
able with the former reagent.
»
ANALYSIS (NOV TRAIN)
Samples are analyzed by the standard phenoldisulfonic acid method.
This is now incorporated in the new EPA source testing Method 7.
E-7
-------
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY REPORT
-------
.SAMPLES
tfc t
V/£ - g, jj.
CR
NO.
LOCATION end
SAMPLE HO.
SAliPLE
WEIGHT
TIT,
ALIQ.
MS ir
ALIQ
un
- t
Jefi.
o ' o
o. o
0-005-7
0.61 I 3
o.
O
12
O .CM3
i/k
"El
/.*«-$
o /o 326
C '
0.
1 50
0,03 fir
5.6 3 7
0>OI?3
- /<5
0-0^-13
0.012-2
ro
.13?*
To'l
0,110!
f
0/000?
LCi.'-
o-oi
Project No.
Collection Data 7/2 7 -
Analysis Date
I ^ ?/
F-l
-------
j5AMH£S
old. - K.M. : tf?a»ic.£tA ,
CR
NO.
IOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SA1-IP1E
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS in
ALIQ
wt.
A (!
X
AJ
- z
•/'
M
V
- t/
, ?
c 17.
•0 • 7,© 2 I
OvO
0.
- c
7
S
0
3 6O
f ?•,:••:-,*
t^- _
© .
•fcoW
/,
-------
SAMPLES
•Btf'otf
'i ./ /
ft, A *
CR
RO.
LOCATION &nd
SAMPLE NO.
SAl-IPLE
HEIGHT
ni.
ALIQ.
JB ir
ALIQ
-WT
- /
0.6^3
0,02*1
-7
loo
-O'O\ lo
*
,O 3 l_l
0.031
/
o - n t>
lil!32Si
- 7
- 3
73"
0(
0,4 J 26
0.0)2^
u
Project No.
Collection Date 7/2? ~
Analysis Date _ ^
F-3
-------
SAMPLES
CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS iri
ALIQ
L.
.fell'
Q.CCZf
U
u
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date __
F-4
-------
£, F.
SMILES
U/t - £.
Project Ko.
Collection Date 7/27 -
Analysis Date
F-5
-------
SAMPLES
OJG. -A.M. tita^M
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis Date
F-6
-------
G,
To
Project Koe
Collection Date 7/27 -
Analysts Date
F-7
-------
SAMPLES
u/e
fit [70 ME
e, f
OR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
M i 6 - 1
-I
-3
*" o
SO
SAMPLE
IffilGHT
*«
TIT.
ALIQ.
fi
VQ irj
ALIQ.
O-OOgf,"
O.o of 3
0,00 (8
Wet
'ft
0,0039
o.oolB
- ?
•-0.00^3
•-QJOCIT
0,00^7
0
ISZ
n
Project No.
- M
- tz
LL9-
o . o
^.6/77
0
0,oo
a.
0.6 f3f
0.0 (
0-0111
f
Collectxcn Date
7/?7 -
Analysis Date
' 157
7/
F-8
-------
SAHPIES
AC
80.
LOCATION imd
SAMPUS KO.
SAIiPIZ
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
KG iii
ALIQ
AJof
Q.C21.0
•0 ' 02.2.}
o
0
JZ£
37733
Jl
o
0-0375
rt
t
. 0 0
0-0051
-7
^.f 00-77
.34
0.003^
-/i
0
40
8678
oTcoft?
O-OOf©
Q> 01 0 3-.
0
Project Ho.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date ___
F-9
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
LOCATION and
NO.
SAl-tPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
KG iri
ALIQ
Mr
m.
0-0033
o- e>
-------
SAMPLES
V/t
OH/O
•
ca
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAliPLE
WEIGHT
O&&£
[M&2
TIT.
ALIQ.
©762
16*7
MG iti
ALXQ
7VU
Vt
0
O.OOIfl
.flr
IE
U
-1
'*}
- II
Project No.
7?;ST5"|
JLiSL
6.06 Of
3605*
\ 1
&c
oo l
-------
SAHPIES
cot.
Project No.
Collection Cat e_
Analysis Date ,__
7 -
F-12
-------
SAMPLES
* *
L5L
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPI£ NO.
SAliPLE
1-JEIGUT
TIT.
ALIQ.
JS in
ALIQ
wt
M
£7£ - '
17
HL
fig-
-2,
- 3
o
- I
O.OQOf
0
"Jtjtf
U
Project No
Collection Date_
Analysis Date __
7 "
I/ 7 7 ./..
F-13
-------
lit. wfl t v £> £
SAMPLES
A.M.
OHIO
CE
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE KO.
"
SAl-tPLE
WEIGHT
m.
ALIQ.
MS i
ALIQ
- 2.
6,0011
^5_
0.6 67 I
"78,
O.CDV?
'0.00*6
te
o.oou
8^-2722
23
0-00
/468
__?-£-
0/0072-
0.00/5"
- ft
- / 7.
aooii
it
0.00 3 c
6884-
P2J8
007f
0,002®
!-(•*&
Project No
Collection Date.
Analysis Date _
F-14
-------
SAMPLES
fed* I
[C&
NO.
LOCATION end
SAMPI£ NO.
SAl-fPLE
HEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
133 i^
ALIQ
M
a CD
AVJ
U
0,0102
^Mlo
0,0072
-7
TTTFTS"
7^37
340
,0043
-.//
3/O
S.£<
0-0163
0^142
- ft-
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date __
F-15
-------
U/C
RI
urf
ca
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE HO.
Vo\.,<
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MO irj
ALIQ
£76 -/
5.01
,oo z •? c
GC$<
0*003$
-3
\A)16 -
'.0271
- 2
1I'028
Q-2.%0
lie.
,0172.
-3
38^ t
n
u
O'OOO
¥
od
Project No.
Collection Date__'7/2.7 "
Analysis Date t' j
F-16
-------
SAKPI&S
o
CR
NO.
n
JJOCATXON and
SAMPLE HO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT,
ALIQ.
KG irj
ALIQ
ftilE- /
- Or
L
>>
M tit.
-' 6"
n
£?»•>. i
& ef t
AQ.^t
Project No.
Collection Date "?/2 ? "
Analysis Date
F-17
-------
SAMFIES
ole - rt.&t.
Project No.
*?*
) o"i&. I
~H o
Collection Date 7/2? -
Analysis Date \-^<^^T I
F-18
-------
SAMPLES
OH to
'. of
[OR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE HO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
4—r—f-
!3oV/<:-
A/efu^.
Iffi ii<
ALIQ
L_
/
f/3.3
I?, u
n.
L.
— 3
13.
0 3-
L.
- 2.
Of
f >
[_
U
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis Date
F-19
-------
So.
SAMPLES
(//t«
£3.
*4
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SA1-IPLE
IffilGHT
TIT.
ALIQ,
Tlif! \ .
FiF XT
L_
- 2
e>
l_
jr
- c
•fj
(HA
0.11
- *
L_
0/2
6-23
0.05"
6,15-'
0.29
n
-//
-/z
•n
^r
SLA^K
Project No.
- * A~ .
Analysis Date ^_
/
T-20
-------
SAMPLES
• (,
CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
IK ir<
ALIQ
L.
_ y
07
,-• c
)
L
-. 2.
A
A/^
- /
ui
n
Project No.
Collection D?.te_
Analysis Date __
-21 /
P-21
-------
APPENDIX G
TEST LOG
-------
APPENDIX G - TEST LOG
Date(197iy
7/27
7/29
7/30 ***
7/31
8/1
8/2
8/3
8/4
8/5
Location Sample No.
Exhaust M1E-1
Inlet MID-1
Exhaust M1E-2
Inlet MID -2
Exhaust MlE-3
Inlet MID-3
Exhaust M1E-4, 5
Inlet MID-4,5
Exhaust MlE-6,7
Inlet ' . MID-6,7
Exhaust . MlE-8,9
Inlet MID-8,9
Exhaust MlE-10,11
Inlet MID-10,11
Exhaust M1E-12
Inlet MID-12
East Tapping Exh. ETE-1,2,3
West Tapping Exh. WTE-1,2,3
Note: All tests except particle sizing follow
* : Filter
** : Meter
*** : Plant
and pulley problems.
box failure. Sampling interrupted
Particulate Orsat S02 Metal Particle Size
X
*
X
*
X
*
XX
XX
**x
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
X
XXX
XXX
the order
shortly
operation at one -half load. Exhaust tests
X X
xx-
X X
XX XX XX
**X XX X
X
XX XX X
--..--• -- '. XXX
xx x Lost xx
'-- -- -- xxxxx
X X XXXX
— x xx- xx on 8/4
xxx xx- --x xx on 8/4
of each sample number, as shown. On 7/28 plant was down
after started.
conducted anyway.
o
-------
APPENDIX H
RELATED REPORTS
-------
Related reports covering emissions from reactive metals furnaces,
under this same contract for the Environmental Protection Agency, are
as follows:
Emission
Test Number Survey Location Control Device Status
FA-1 Foote Mineral Co., None Issued Aug.,1971
Steubenville, Ohio
FA-2 Union Carbide Corp., Venturi Scrubber This Report
Marietta, Ohio
FA-3 Airco Alloys and Carbide, Baghouse Issued Oct.,1971
Niagara Falls, N.Y.
FA-4 Airco, Electrostatic In Progress
Charleston, S.C. Precipitator
FA-5 Future
Future
H-l
-------
APPENDIX I
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
R. N. Allen, P.E., Project Leader
N. A. Blessing, Chemist
C. C. Gonzalez, Chemist
W. E. Schroeder, Chemist
J. R. Avery, Technician
L. W. Baxley, Technician
W. C. Hall, Technician
G. Hogan, M.S., (Particle Size Determination)
G. Patchell, Senior Technician,
(Particle Size Determination)
T. J. Wright, PhD., (Particle Size Determination)
1-1
-------
APPENDIX J
PARTICLE SIZING SAMPLES
-------
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF METAL FUME
INTRODUCTION
Determinations of particle size distribution of fume emissions
at the Ferroalloy Division Plant of Union Carbide, in Marietta, Ohio,
were conducted from July 27 through August 4, 1971. Emissions from
the No. 1 furnace were evaluated at the following points: in the
furnace hood exhaust duct prior to emission control, in the exhaust
stack after emission control, and in the two stacks from the tap
exhaust hood.
METHODS
A Brink cascade impactor was employed to obtain data on size dis-
tribution in this study. Two samples were collected using the
'Andersen Stack Sampler but 90 percent of the particles gathered on the
filter and not enough data points were available to provide the desired
information. As a result the Andersen Stack Sampler was discarded in
favor of the Brink cascade impactor.
The Brink impactor, followed by a 47 millimeter glass fiber filter,
was mounted on a probe and connected to a vacuum pump by a length of
rubber tubing. The inlet side of the pump was fitted with a vacuum gauge,
calibrated in inches of mercury, and a flow controlling valve. The outlet
side of the pump was connected to a dry gas meter whenever samples were
collected for periods longer than two minutes.
J- 1
-------
Prior to collecting samples in the field, the impactor was calibrated
to determine air flow rates at various operating conditions. Rates were
determined by assembling the particle sizing train as shown in Figure 1.
Air was drawn through the impactor for 10 minutes at each pressure drop
(A?) of five inches of Hg, seven inches of Hg, and 10 inches of Hg. The
corresponding volume of air flow for each sample was measured by the dry
gas meter. A calibration curve was constructed by plotting the pressure
drop across the impactor versus the air flow rate.
Volumetric flow rates for the short duration samples, of one and two
minutes, were measured by the A? across the impactor. For samples of
longer duration than two minutes, volume was measured by a dry gas meter.
A AP of five inches of Hg was maintained during all sampling. The
impactor was grounded, either to the stack or building, to prevent electro-
static deposition of particles.
As high temperatures were encountered, in the furnace hood exhaust
duct, the plugged impactor was inserted into the duct for at least five
minutes, to allow time for thermal equilibrium. The impactor was then
removed from the duct, the plug removed, and reinserted into the duct for
sample collection. Samples were collected from each of the five ports on
*
the upper surface of the duct, at a depth of 24 inches into the duct.
Difficulties were experienced in collecting these samples due to the dense
concentration of the particles in that duct. Samples were first collected
for 10 minutes, but these were not satisfactory because too many particles
deposited on the collection plates. Sampling time was then reduced to
five minutes with the results being the same.
J-2
-------
A dilution air apparatus was placed in series with the Brink impactor
to dilute the particles before they entered the first stage. This process
also proved unsatisfactory because the extreme temperatures in the duct
(up to 1300 F) melted the silver soldered joints of the dilution air
apparatus as well as oxidizing the inner surfaces of the unit. Finally,
the sampling time was reduced to one and two minutes without dilution,
and this procedure was found to be satisfactory.
In order to prevent condensation, with the high moisture content of
the furnace exhaust gases, following passage through the venturi
scrubber/cyclone control device, it was necessary to preheat the impactor
and filter holder to a temperature above the dew point. This was
accomplished by wrapping the entire impactor and filter holder assembly
with electrical heating tape, insulated with asbestos tape and aluminum
foil. The tape was plugged into a 120 volt AC line and allowed to heat
• the sampling device for at least 15 minutes prior to sampling.
Exhaust emission samples were collected from a 3 inch port approxi-
mately 70 feet above ground level, and 36 inches into the stack, for
periods of 30 to 55 minutes. At least two samples were taken at pressure
drops of 37 inches of water, 47 inches of water, and 57 inches of water
• .
across the venturi scrubbers.
J-3
-------
Simultaneous samples were collected for 20 minutes, in each of the
two tap hood exhaust stacks, during furnace tapping. These samples were
collected at ports located on the fourth floor of the furnace building,
at a distance of 30 inches into the stacks.
RESULTS
Graphical results are shown in Sub Appendix 1 and the field data
sheets are included in Sub Appendix 2. The characteristic diameter of
an aerosol particle for each impactor stage (Dpc) has been calculated
for a pressure drop across the impactor of five inches of mercury,
assuming particles of unit density (1 gram/cubic centimeter), using the
equation described by * J. A. Brink, Jr. The characteristic diameters
are as follows:
Stage No. Dpc, microns
1
2
3
4
5
3.40
2.00
1.36
0.69
0.42
Graphical presentation of the data, that is, log-probability plots
of cumulative percent less than stated micron size versus the Dpc for each
stage in microns, is shown for each sample in the following section. A
graphically determined mass median diameter (HMD) and geometric standard
deviation ( 0- g) for each sample are presented in the following Table A.
* Industrial Engineering and Chemistry, Vol..50, April 1958, pp 645-648.
J-4
-------
TABLE A
Date
7/31/71
7/31/71
8/1/71
8/3/71
8/3/71
8/2/71
8/4/71
8/4/71
8/4/71
8/4/71
Sample
Number
A
C
E
N
P
H
DD
U
W
AA
Location of Port
Sample Number
Exhaust Stack
it
n
it
ii
n
n
"
ii
it
Duration of
Sampling
(Min.)
10 '
30
34
45
50
30
50
55
45
55
AP Across
Venturi Scrubber HMD
(in.H^O) microns
2 - - .. .
57 0.325
" 0.21
" « 0.42*
11 «0.42*
" 0.68
47 0.34
" 0.31
37 0.57
0.44
" 0.60
6~ g
microns
3.85
2.19
*
*
1.80
3.59
3.06
2.41
2.78
2.27
Remarks
Furnace
sample
Furnace
sample
tapped during
collection
tapped during
collection
8/2/71
8/2/71
8/2/71
8/1/71
8/3/71
8/3/71
8/3/71
8/3/71
8/4/71
8/4/71
8/4/71
8/4/71
I
J
L
D
U
0
R
S
X
EE
Y
ZZ
Inlet Duct
Tapping Ducts
Jl
II
1
1
2
3
3
4
5
5
East
West
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
20
20
20
20
47
it
ti
37
57
57
0.82
0.56
5.4
3.4*
0.9
0.79
2.35
0.60
1.75
0.86
2.50
0.83
2.23
2.63
4.50
*
2.14
3.80
1.45
1.25
3.60
3.90
4.28
3.86
Data points are at the extremities of the graphs, either less than 15%, or greater than 85% of
stated size. Reliable particle sizes could therefore not be determined from this data.
-------
SUB-APPENDIX J-l
GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
J-6
-------
PARTICLE SIZE SAMPLES
EXHAUST STACK
INLET DUCT
Sample
A P = 57" H^O Number
/
A
C
E
N
P
AP = 47" H^O H
DD
A P - 37" H.O U
j i . 2
W
AA
TAPPING
Sample
East • Number
; X
EE
West Y
Z
Date
Time
Sampled
7/31 1340-1350
7/31 1720-1750
8/1 0303-0837
8/3 0755-0840
8/3 1709-1759
8/2 2025-2055
8/4 1857-1947
8/4 0740-0835
8/4 0847-0932
8/4 1621-1706
EXHAUSTS
Date
8/4
8/4
8/4
8/4
Time
Sampled
1642-1702
2010-2030
1641-1701
2010-2030
10
30
34
45
50
30
50
55
45
45
20
20
20
20
Time
min.
•->.
min.
min.
min.
min.
min.
min.
min.
min.
min.
Time
min.
min.
min.
min.
Sample
Port #1 Number
I
J
Port #2 L
Port #3 D
T
U
Port #4 0
Port #5 R
S
Date
8/2
8/2
8/2
8/1
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
8/3
Time
Sampled
1105-1106
1108-1109
1852-1353
1720-1722
1945-1947
1950-1952
1410-1412
1738-1740
1742-1744
Time
1 min.
1 min.
1 min.
2 min.
2 rnin.
2 min.
2 min.
2 min.
2 min.
J-7
-------
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 CO
i I I ! I I 1 i
6.0 6.5
7.0
J-9
-------
3.0
3.5
-------
2%
10 15 20
30
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
70
80 85 90
95
98%
— I.
-ft-FIr
4-4
ntr
"IT
:-TJ
1L.
""^ri'd:
._. j--—-
.1.
-^;r:r:t-ziz. - r.1^;
1 '—
—i —^
r~T_ t-jm^__~ —'-"^ " " ' ' — -n-Ai i.-—"~T
-'—J.'.——""-
-T-
m.
~ zru ~T"— T~_r~_~ 7—
'_*_" ."j.J ^."^'."_" Z._...",~IT.
3.0
4.0
I I! I 1 I ;
4.5 h.O
PKOUITS
i I I i i I I I I i
S.5 £.0
6.5
7.0
J
-11
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
98%
3.0
3.5
-12
-------
2%
PERCENTAGE
10 60 60
98%
-13
-------
2%
IP- 15 20
30
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
70
80 85 90
95
987
•^—7.3 __i r, . ^r",
I ;
r^Er
rnfe
—i-1~.-~
~±;.~
-t—
ILLTJ1 t*I-." —
•:a:
HIT
LJJi;^
nit
::::\:::
' —'
—•- - rX
^±
S\
*£
12.1
3.0
3.5
"T
4.0
6.0
PROCITS
5.5
TT~
c.o
T~T
6.5
7.0
J
-14
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
t:Ji-ri-k : n-H hit H ;|ii n{- {Hi tin mi Hi ;-; • j n ••;!.-nv i;n'i 1 ;-1-'r- -^iri----fc-
I t-- ~ f 1 ' .1 .'. m i I I ' f -.. 1^1 ^-« a » r - * '- ] -' J J jil.J- .M-^.»- -*J •- T i i 'i I*.M j «.»*.P. i . •' ij ;.!..«• •• i i i ! ... ..I—. . . j—. * .. .
I I i i II I I
4.0 4.S
..1
3.0
7.0
J-15
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
98%
;^dT.-t-:^-^^
7.0
J-16
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
l^:Nm!ITTiTTMi|l!li^
3.0
3.5
7.0
J-17
-------
PERCENTAGE
50 60
98%
: -HH utv 11 w.\ •:• ; [ -H i
i-.j 1 i-LU lu-^ .—i ^-u-l Uiiilin -
S.O
S.D
J-18
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
il I I i I I I i
5.5 6.0
3.0
-------
J-20
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
-21
-------
98%
IT-'HVJH--T '1 i"l'~~T'- t'.r'T ',~T " T" T'l 11 • 1 I ;'"'1TV!"—"•" "vTr'T"- > 1 • ' ':' • • i • T i;: T i - : T I *"' i j rn . I-, i rrrn i
:r;:t-l-'. . /jvl j ; M' - •; i Jill} JT !j!j ji j j!l MJJlJi!' :::! '''! ! II IH i.!' fi -.jl-: !
- -- - i r I ~ 1 . -r- ; j I —i a-t-r - -*••* • i J .- .illj . i . .. l-t . --.-.-- n . . - •».»,. . »J— . ..!!.• • •• ..••«— 1 I I I
M i i i i i i n
5.5 6.0
.1
3.0
7.0
J-22
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
3.0
3.5
-23
-------
-24
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 60
.1
3.0
3.5
4.0
-25
-------
PE/
-------
PERCENTAGE
40 50 GO
98%
,2
3.0
3.5
-27
-------
PERCENTAGE
60 50 60
98%
5^3=l=»^mttll]1IW^^ 1ftM:h-i
J-28
-------
2%
9
10 15 20
PERCENTAGE
30 <0 bO CO
.n...^»j. ^ I'-uJ," ' y;_*"'"'"""'r '
i I I 1 I! II
4.0 4.S
3.0
3.S
6.9
7.0
J-29
-------
p.
Stack No. c^X vvt«T>. «T££- u3^s^~
STAGE POST. WT. PRE. V/T. WT. a\IN
Date
CUM. $
LESS THEN E-pc
I3.C.
Filter
--
OB,3 32
J-35
-------
Stack No.
Sample Wo.
STAGE
POST. VT. PRE. V7T.
Date
WT. GAIN
CUM. $
LESS THEN DDC
=U 6
e.l
8
Filter
.00 v -7 __._
35
/o
,00 (-7
_JJli^
TT°
Z^rrtX
O.
So
9 •?
- 924
5.
5".o
JP.VZ -
J-34
-------
Stack No
Sample No.
STAGE
. dU
tfV
0
fT*.
POST. WT. PRE. WT.
Date "^
A
222-
CUM. ^
LESS THEN Dpc
7
0,1 '
s , (.
-a.
03
i.
$
8
Filter
0. I0\\
J-33
-------
' \
731
Stack No.
Sample No.
STAGE
cr\
0
3
POST. WT. PRE. WT. WT. GAIN
CUM. %
LESS THEN Dpc
J-32
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
STAGE
0
Date 7/3 I
•*.*••(• Ccj j :*^O p «*v «2 '^»*-v 9*°**^
^y •• M-.r^a';v^r.A;-, ^^i;ta
POST. WT.
PRE. WT.
WT. GAIN
(cO, .
CUM. ^
LESS THEN Dpc
\4.2>
1\ .5
8
Filter
o.-g
J-31
-------
SUB-APPENDIX J-2
FIELD DATA
J-30
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
Date
STAGE
POST. WT.
PRE. WT. WT. GAIN
CUM. %
LESS THEN Dnc
3, I 4^3
e;
•JS. 38-7
7-2U
ll.-l
.4
Filter
> a. a
5
ff
J-36
-------
./ ;•
Stack No.
Sample No •
Date
Stage Post T*t. Pre Wt.
Wt Gain
Cum. ^
less than Doc
a,
Q-7
filter
, 0.7
40
'
' C> K \
I -- "I*- I
7 IS'. 3 44
J-37
-------
Stack No.. _
Sample No.
A -i
^•° 2
3
6
P->7lll/
/O^Jf-^J^
STAGE POST. WT. PRE. V7T. WT. GAIN
O'i
st
CUM. o
gO
10
. o
35.6.
Z
-SK*.
^ o
^
»>
J-38
-------
8
Filter
0.
5.0
• 743
$5 $.'f>,2> i b
20 •-• . - ':• '•' 'o
^o ^r/y. ^>c,3
/•^ £^5. c, 44
/O -
A ' (.. . .( '
Stack No.
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
_^"""'' ll-'-.l--
STAGE POST. WT. PRE. WT. WT. GAIN
0
.577
r<-
7
104-ii
8
vVK^, 77
t^" N. Filter CX f
0,((.3<
1.3
Date
CUM. ^
LESS THEN Dpc
....-
t/o
^ S
? o
l<
(0
6 :' 5 - 4
6 r 3 - a
70
J-40
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
STAGE
0*1
t: 4 7
0
POST. WT. PRE. WT.
.
WT. GAIN
If
CUM. ^
LESS THEN Doc
o
I.I
V?. J o
3,3
K.
6 . 'i
Filter £?•
J-41
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
STAGE
SY\
POST. WT. PRE. WT. WT. GAIN
'« I
CUM. %
LESS THEN Dpc
a.-
l.t
0)7
8
Filter
O.H53
J-42
-------
L
Stack No. JLKidBYVdwk^P' -f/eo^-^v^ T ' K^t-' Date
Sample No.
CUM. %
STAGE POST. WT. PRE. WT> '.WT. 'GAIN LESS THEN Due
0
3 .A ** t f*> f —» / . e^y fff~
,
-------
C2>
Stack No.
Sample No.
STAGE
0
POST. WT. PRE. WT. WT. GAIN
Date -^3
L.
CUM. ^
LESS THEN Dpc
4,7
IT
8
Filter
C..7
I' «<
'.,<•$
J-44
-------
PRE.
WT. G^IN
I**- x. JLC ^ ?-*-&,
' CUM. %
LESS THEN Doc
. 3
8
Filter
\
J-45
-------
SgAGE^ .POST, TO. ERE. WT. WT. GAIN
0
f,o
a
,!
7.*
.3
7.
3«.3
5
e
8
niter
//
TV I, 0
J-46
-------
O - 1
fr^f n. n 4
Stack No. ji^JLJr aoaLJr A D - f?" Lf A, 2a*e'
Sample No.
CUM. %
STAGE POST. WT. . PRE. WT. VT. GAIN # LESS THEN Dpc
0
3 3.^02.^- *$ - 6 Q -
7TTT
J-47
-------
£
Stack No. j^^gxJ^^X J^? - h? y. Date
Sample No. _
CUM. $
STAGE POST. WT. PRE. WT. WT. GAIN $ LESS THEN DDC
3. ^"7 » a
8
4.o
Filter
4
f ^ .. . { / VI . \l *
r <
J-48
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
o^
STAGE POST. WT. ERE. WT. WT. GAIN
Date
r
CUM. ^
LESS THEN Doc
6.3.
2.0
58,
,&3 '73
8
Filter
5.8
J-49
-------
Stack No.
8
Filter
n ,
^ . I /I -^ «PM
Sample No. 4-a.rT * V' r
CUM. $
STAGE POST. WT. PRE. V7T. WT. GAIN <£ LESS THEN Dpc
0
o. 1 (6, a 6^3
J-50
~ -t
-------
Date
Stack No. '
Sample
OcWv-«V
1
<•
filter
Cum. %
e Post Wt. Pre Wt. Wt Gain % less than Doc
2 -3.^3-1 -7'*i->l 0. a. H.-5 7 | 3
d O.f- "7,1 /
o.\ l.l 36.7
l.34i
-------
Stack No.
Sample No.
STAGE
POST. WT. PRE. WT. WT.
Date
CUM. #
LESS THEN Dpc
3
/i,S S 1 3
O.
. G o 1o
7
8
Filter
ID- 2-
J-52
-------
T L &J>Jh
>. >^P Q^f\^eL^y- t-' LESS THEN Dpc
U27V
rfr^fe
7
>?>
o,
8 f.
Filter -J t^*1 .| U
-------
APPENDIX K
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EMISSIONS
-------
PREFACE
The following report, covering chemical analysis
of emissions from reactive metal smelting operations
at Marietta, Ohio, has been prepared by the technical
staff of TRW Systems Group, One Space Park, Redondo Beach,
California.
Principal Contributors: D. F. Carroll
M. L. Kraft
W. B. Hewitt
Approved By: J. R. Ogren
K-l
-------
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF EMISSIONS
FROM
REACTIVE METAL SMELTING OPERATIONS
1. INTRODUCTION
Particulate fumes and gaseous emissions are generated during the
smelting and pouring of a commercially important class of ferro alloy
materials called reactive metals. The particulate portion of these
emissions has been collected on glass fiber filters, strategically
placed in the air stream of an exhaust system. Six such filters from
the Union Carbide Corporation (Marietta, Ohio) were analyzed micro-
scopically, by qualitative electron beam X-ray microanalysis, and
atomic absorption. The analytical results are presented in the
following sections.
2. TEST RESULTS
2.1 Optical Examination
The specimens were examined at magnifications up to SOX. The
particulate matter could be seen intimately mixed with the quartz filter
fibers and it was obvious that the particulate matter could not be
physically separated from the filter pad upon which it had been collected.
Under tungsten filament the specimens appeared as follows:M1E-6 (light
gray), M1E-7 (dark gray), M1E-12 (yeHow-brown) and ETE-2 (partly dark
brown, partlylight brown).
K-2
-------
2.2 Electron Beam X-Ray Microanalysis
The electron microprobe is an advanced piece of equipment which uses
a small beam of electrons to produce characteristic X-ray emissions from
a sample volume with a radius of -1 micron. Curved crystal X-ray
spectrometers are used to analyze the resultant characteristic X-ray
spectra. In these analyses, the electron beam was defocused to a diameter
of 150 microns (0.006 inch) to cover a relatively large area of each
specimen and thereby obtain data which would be representative of the
entire sample. The electron beam impinged in vacuum upon the untouched
sample surface. An examination was made of the complex spectrum of X-rays
given off by the specimen under electron beam excitation, and it was found
that the entire spectrum could be identified uniquely on the basis of the
elements shown in Table 1. All portions of the X-ray spectrum in the
wavelength range 1-100A covering all elements except H, He, Li, and Be
were taken into account.
: The analyses were conducted on small portions of the filter pads which
were not later digested for the atomic absorption analyses. The small
samples for electron probe analyses are still intact. The qualitative
analysis results are summarized in Table 1. Several points seem germane:
1. The major elements are manganese, magnesium, calcium, and
potassium. The silicon signal could have come from either
the filter pad or from the particulate matter. The fibers
of the pad were visible in the optical microscope which is
attached to the electron probe.
K-3
-------
2. Distinct signals, equivalent to several weight percent,
were found for sulfur, chlorine, carbon, sodium, and
potassium.
3. The presence of sodium and chlorine frequently suggests
salt and could have come from handling with bare hands.
However, it must be stated that the filters were not
handled with bare hands during the chemical analysis
effort.
2.3 Atomic Absorption Analyses
Atomic Absorption (A.A.) means that a cloud of atoms in the
un-ionized and unexcited state is capable of absorbing radiation
at wavelengths that are specific in nature and characteristic of
the element in consideration. The atomic absorption spectre-
photometer used in these analyses consists of a series of lamps
which emit the spectra of the elements determined, a gas burner
to produce an atomic vapor of the sample, a monochromator to
isolate the wavelengths of interest, a detector to monitor the
change of absorption due to the specimen, and a readout meter to
visualize this change in absorption.
K-4
-------
The filters with samples were weighed, and the sample weights
calculated by subtracting the tare weights written on the outside
of the Petri dish sample containers from the total weights.
Specimen identifications were as follows: MlE-6, MlE-7, MlE-12,
and a composited specimen consisting of filters WTE-3, ETE-1,
and ETE-2.
K-5
-------
Table 1. Qualitative Electron Beam X-Ray Microanalyses
Specimen
No.
M1E-6
M1E-7
M1E-12
ETE-2
Cr
-
-
T
Mn
H
H
H
H
Mq
M
H
H
H
Fe
L
L
L
L
Al
T
M
H
H
Ca
H
H
H
H
Ba
-
T
M
'M
Na
M
H
H
H
K
H
H
H
H
Zn
L
T
-
T
Cl
H
•H
L
L
S
M
H
L
M
Si
M
H
H
H
C
L-M
L-M
L-M
L-M
KEY: H = greater than 20 wt% •
M = 10-20 wt%
L = 1-10 wt%
T = less than 1 wt%
NOTE: Sample ETE-2 was later composited with WTE-2 and ETE-1 in the atomic
absorption analyses. The compositing operation in this particular
case involved digesting three filter pads, with their particulate
matter, in one common acid solution. The microprobe analyses were
performed on a portion of ETE-2 that was not digested.
ro
CO
•
«^J
««l
—4
01
-------
4742.3.71-145
The filters (both pad and parti cul ate) were extracted for 2 hours with
50 mis of 1:1 HgSO^; this solution was decanted and saved. The filters were
then extracted for 2 hours with a boiling dilute Aqua Regia solution.* This
solution was then combined with the H2SO. solution, filtered, taken to con-
stant volume in a volumetric flask, and analyzed by A. A. The instrumental
parameters used for the individual elements are given in Table 2, and the
results of the A. A.** analyses are shown in Table 3.
The A. A. results are normalized to compensate for the portion removed
for electron beam X-ray microanalyses. Silica (Si Op) analyses were not per-
formed since the entire Si02 filter pad with the intimately mixed specimen
was digested in acid in each case. In order to determine if the acid diges-
tion process chemically attacks the Si Op filter, an unused filter will be
exposed to the digestion process and A. A. analyses run on a blank to deter-
mine background concentrations. A remote possibility exists that some K or
Na could have come from the filter material if it is not pure
Note also that in Table 3 only one specimen (M1E-6) adds up to 100%.
The other specimens most likely consist of metal oxides or a mixture of
metals and metal oxides; oxygen and silicon are therefore the likely
missing chemical components needed to bring the totals in all four cases
to 100%. . •
A comparison of these results with the results reported in Part 1
(Foote Mineral Corporation-Steubenville, Ohio) immediately brings to light
certain differences between the two emissions. The Union Carbide (Marietta,
Ohio) emissions contain, in general, l£ss chromium but more manganese,
sodium, potassium, chlorine, and to be particularly noted, sulfur, than do
the Foote Mineral Corporation emissions.
R. J. Thompson, G. B. Morgan, and L. J. Purdue, "Analysis of Selected Ele-
ments in Atmospheric Particulate Matter by Atomic Absorption", Atomic
Absorption NEWS Letter, Volume 9, No. 3, 1970
**
Walter Slavin, Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy> Interscience Publishers,
New York, New York, pp 79-189, 1968.
K-7
-------
4742.3.71-145
Table 2. Instrumental Parameters
Element
Cr
Mn
Mg
Fe
Al
Ca
Ba
Na
K
Zn
Wavelength
(AT
3579
2801
2852
2483
3093
4227
5536
. 5890
7665
2139
Fuel Oxidizer
System
Air-Acetylene
Air-Acetylene
NpO-Acetylene
Air-Acetylene
N20-Acetylene
NgO-Acetylene
^O-Acetylene
Air-Acetylene
Air-Acetylene
Air-Acetylene
Slit
Width (A)
2
2
7
2
7
7
7
20
20
7
Hollow Cathode
Current (Ma)
10
10
4
12
13
8
7
10
10
8
K-8
-------
Table 3. Atomic Absorption Analysis Results Elemental Concentration (Wt%)
Specimen
No.
M1E-6
M1E-7
M1E-12
Comoosite
(WTE-3, ETE-1,
and ETE-2)
Cr
0.09
0.04
0.09
0.1
,
Mn
27.6
7.6
7.7
21.8
Mq
2.3
1.2
1.2
0.6
Fe
1.0
• 0.2
0.3
1.0
Al
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.7
Ca
0.6
0.9
. 0.4
0.4
Ba
-
-
-
-
Na
21.3
44.4
37.8
<0.05
K
37.3
18.2
14.8
6.0
•
Zn
1.9
0.2
^.01
0.3
Total (%}
94.2
73.3
63.2
30.9
NOTE: Silicon analyses not performed.
SPECIAL NOTE: The values have been corrected, at the last minute, to account for contributions from
the collector pad. .,
-J
-R»
CO
CO
I
4^
cn
------- |