MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
MRI
REPORT
SOURCE TESTING
EPA TASK NO. 6
STANDARD OIL OF CALIFORNIA COMPANY
El Segundo, California
by
Chatten Cowherd
Midwest Research Institute
Kansas Cityj Missouri 64110
EPA Contract No. 68-02-0228
''MRI Project No. 3585-C)
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 • AREA 816 561-0202
-------
SOURCE TESTING
EPA TASK WO. 6
7/-
STANDARD OIL OF CALIFORNIA COMPANY
El Segundo, California
Chatten Cowherd
Midwest Research Institute
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
EPA Contract Wo. 68-02-0228
(MRI Project Wo. 3585-C)
(MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 VOLKER BOULEVARD, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64110 « AREA 816 561-0202
-------
PREFACE
The work reported herein was conducted by Midwest Research
Institute (MRI), pursuant to a Task Order issued by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under the terms of EPA Contract No. 68-02-0228.
Mr. E. P. Shea served as the Project Chief and directed the MRI Field
Team consisting of: Messrs. Ed Trompeter, Bob Conkling, Gary Kelso,
Bill Shutts, Reid Flippin, Bob Stultz, and Henry Maloney. Mr. Fred
Bergman, assisted by Messrs. Mike Hammons and Terry Howard, performed
the pollutant analyses at the MRI laboratories. Dr. Chatten Cowherd, Jr.,
prepared this Final Report.
Approved for:
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
/Paul C. Constant, Jr.
Program Manager
28 April 1972
slw ii
-------
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. Introduction 2
III. Summary of Results 5
IV „ Process Description 12
V. Location of Sampling Points 13
Vic Process Operations 16
VII. Sampling and Analytical Procedures 17
Appendix A - Particulate Results 24
Appendix B - Gaseous Results 38
Appendix C - Operation Results 46
Appendix D - Field Data 47
Appendix E - Standard Sampling Procedures 98
Appendix F - Laboratory Report 110
Appendix G - Test Log 115
Appendix H - Project Participants and Titles 117
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Under the Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended, the Environmental
Protection Agency is charged with establishment of performance standards
for stationary source categories which may contribute significantly to air
pollution. A performance standard is a standard for emissions of air pollu-
tants which reflect emission limitations attainable through the best emis-
sion reduction systems that have been adequately demonstrated (taking into
account economic considerations).
The development of realistic performance standards requires
accurate data on pollutant emissions within the various source categories.
In the petroleum refining industry, the catalyst regeneration system at
the Standard Oil of California's refinery in El Segundo, California, was
designated by EPA as representative of a well controlled operation, and
was thereby selected for the emission testing program. This report presents
the results of the testing which was performed by Midwest Research Institute
at the Standard Oil refinery.
At Standard's El Segundo refinery, effluent from the catalyst
regenerator, which is part of the fluid catalytic cracking system, is
treated in the following sequence of steps prior to being discharged to
the atmosphere. Plow from the regenerator passes in two parallel streams
through Buell cyclones followed by heat exchangers. The two streams are
then combined into a single stream which passes through a Cottrell electro-
static precipitator and then through a CO boiler. These treatment steps
-------
eliminate most of the entrained particulate matter and the carbon monoxide
produced by the regeneration process, prior to the discharge of effluent
gases through the CO boiler stack. Measured pollutant emissions from the
catalyst regeneration process consist of particulates, carbon monoxide,
sulfur dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen.
On 9 December 1971, two members of the MRI field team arrived
at the testing site. Their first assignment was to transfer the testing
equipment from the airport to the job site. They also carried out general
preparatory tasks and supervised the alteration to the stack and work plat-
form which was performed by Standard Oil. The NDIR (nondispersive infrared)
instrument was delivered to Beckman for recalibration and installation of
cells (at MRI's expense) to increase the sensitivity for the determination
of carbon monoxide. High wind conditions on 9 and 10 December 1971 forced
a postponement of the installation of the sampling rails for the particu-
late train until 13 December 1971. The remainder of the MRI field team
arrived on the morning of 13 December 1971, with the exception of one man
who arrived the following day.
Source testing was performed on 14, 15 and 16 December 1971. At
the CO Boiler stack location four particulate runs were conducted. During
each period of particulate sampling, three separate gas sampling trains
were operated for the determination of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and
gas composition by Orsat analysis. At the other test location—the feed
duct to the CO boiler—moisture determinations were made and integrated gas
samples were collected for Orsat analysis.
3
-------
Samples of the stack effluent were collected at an elevation of
about four stack diameters above the inlet breeching (inside diameter of
the stack was 13 ft 10 in.) A network of 40 sampling points was used for
the collection of particulate samples, as specified by the Federal Register,
"Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources/' 17 August 1971.
Samples of the boiler feed gases were collected through a valve which was
attached to the 4 ft diameter duct at a distance of about 40 ft from any
flow obstruction.
A number of factors delayed sampling activities in the course of
the testing: (l) the chemicals which were to have been delivered to site
by the supplier did not arrive on time. Consequently, MRI made a pickup
on the morning of 14 December 1971, resulting in a delay of about 4 hr;
(2) a process upset occurred during the change-over period of the first
particulate test on 14 December 1971. This caused a 2-hr delay in sampling
activities; (3) a team from Standard Oil was testing simultaneously with
the MRI team, causing several interruptions in the MRI testing activity.
This resulted in delays of 2-1/2 to 3 hr on 2 days, 14 and 15 December
1971.
The following sections of this report treat: (l) the summary
of results; (2) the description of the process; (3) the location of sampling
points; (4) process operating conditions; and (5) sampling and analytical
procedures.
-------
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Tables I, II, and III present a summary of results from the
particulate and gas emission testing. As shown in Table I, there is a
significant variation in the measured particulate grain loading and emis-
sion rate. The partial grain loading rate (gr/SCF dry) varies from 0.0307
to 0.0653, with an average of 0.0437 for the four runs; the total grain
loading rate varies from 0.044 to 0.177, with an average of 0.114 for
the four runs. The partial emission rate (ib/hr) of the particles collected
varies from 51.4 to 110, with an average of 73.4 for the four runs; the
total emission rate varies from 77.3 to 296, with an average of 191 for
the four runs.
The filters shown in Figure 1, indicate the probable cause of
the above variations. Filters Nos. 51, Test 1; 52, Test 2; and 55, Test 4;
show a reddish brown to black coloration, indicating the presence of organic
matter that is not present on the grayish colored Filters Nos. 53, 30$ of
Test 2; and 54, Test 3. Runs Nos. 1 and 4 had high grain loading values
and used Filters Nos. 51 and 55, respectively. Run No. 2 used Filter No.
52 (70/o of the time) and Filter No. 53 (30$ of the time), and had below
average grain loading. Run No. 3 used Filter No. 54 which collected no
dark material, and had the lowest partial grain loading.
Table II shows the stack gas composition, measured in conjunc-
tion with the particulate test runs for CO, NOx as N02, and S02- CO was
-------
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF RESUIiTS (PARTICULAIE MISSIONS)
CO Boiler Stack Standard Oil of California, El Segundo
NAME
OS
~ QA
PMOS
PC 02
P02
- co"
~~PATm
MF
CAN
CAT
CAW
DESCRIPTION
DATE OF RUN
STK FLOWRATE. DRY»5TD CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOWRATE
PERCENT MOISTURE 3Y VOL
PERCENT C02 BY VOL. DRY
PERCENT 02 BY VOL. DRY
CONC OF CO » DRY
CULATES — PARTIAL CATCH
PARTICULATE WT-PARTIAL
PART. LOAO-PTL»STO CN
"PART. LOAD-PTL»ST< CN
PARTIC EMIS-PA^TIAL
UNITS
DSCFM
ACFM
PPM
MG
GR/OSCF
GR/ACF
LB/HR
1
12-14-71
196403
590164
24.7
7.0
12.4
0.0
219.85
.04555
.01515
76.63
2
12-15-71
186383
:>
-------
12/16/71
12/16/71
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (STACK GAS COMPOSITION)^
Run Date (ppm/vol)
1 12/14/71
2 12/15/71
NOY as
.A.
.) (ib/dscf)
1.31 x 10 ~5
1.39 x 10~5
1.47 x 10~5
1.24 x 10~5
1.46 x 10-5
1.72 x 10~5
1.97 x 10~5
1.67 x 10~5
1.75 x 10~5
1.64 x 10-5
N02
(ppm, dry)
108
114
121
102
120
142
162
138
144
135
S02
( Ib/dscf) (ppm, dry)
-
2.23 x 10 ~5 132
5.48 x ID"5 324
6.09 x 10-5 360
a/ Excluding Orsat analysis.
b/ Determined -with KDIR instrument and corrected for C02 interference.
-------
TABLE III
SUMMARY OF RESULTS (FEED LINE GAS COMPOSITION)
Run
IF
2F
3F
4F
Date
12/14/71
12/15/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
10.2
10.8
11.2
11.0
1.2
2.0
1.2
1.1
CO
8.4
8.1
8.3 "|
8.1 I
Moisture
-
3.0
2.2
8
-------
Table I Test 1 Filter 51
Table I Test 2 Filter 52
Table I Test 2 Filter 53
Table I Test 3 Filter 54
Table I Test 4 Filter 55
Figure 1 - Filters Used in Particulate Sampling
Standard Oil, El Segundo, California
-------
measured to "be 5 ppm, by dry volume, on Test Wo. 4. WOX as W02 varied from
108 to 162 ppm by volume (dry) with an average value of 129 ppm. S02 varied
from 132 to 360 ppm by volume (dry) with an average value of 272 ppm. The
integrated gas samples from Tests 1 to 3 were no good, therefore, we were
unable to obtain values for CO on these tests.
Table III shows the feed line gas composition, sampled with an
integrated gas bag and measured by Orsat analysis. The average values
for the gas composition (expressed as percent by volume, dry) were: C02,
10.8$; 02, 1.4$; and CO, 8.2$.
The C02, 02, and excess air values shown in Table I are obviously
in error for Tests 1 through 3. The probe used to collect these samples
was not long enough to reach a good sampling point in the stack. The
probe tip was only 2-3 in. inside the stack wall, and the port was not
airtight while the sample was being collected from the negative pressure
stack. The port collar was 11 in. long and the wall of the stack was 1 in.
thick. The gas probe used for collecting the samples was 18 in long.
On Test Wo. 4, a 6-ft glass-lined probe was used to withdraw the gas
sample from the stack and fill the gas bag. This probe was inserted so
that the tip was 4 ft inside the stack and a special effort was made to
insure that the port opening was covered. The results from Test 4 are
much more reliable and values for C02, 02, and excess air prove that
this sample was a good sample. Unfortunately the refinery was not run-
ning Orsat analysis on the stack gases while we were testing, so we
10
-------
vere unable to use their values • instead of our obviously incorrect
values.
A summary of process operating data during each test period
will be presented by EPA.
11
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
This section is to be prepared by EPA.
12
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POMES
Figure 2 shows the location of the sampling stations on the feed
line to the CO boiler and on the boiler stack. At the feed line sampling
location, samples for moisture and Orsat analysis were taken through an
existing 3/4-in. valve. The positive pressure of the feed line made it
unnecessary to use a pump to draw the sample.
Particulate samples were collected from the effluent at an eleva-
tion of 55 ft (about four stack diameters) above the inlet breeching. The
inside stack diameter was 13 ft 10 in. Sampling was conducted for equal
amounts of time at each of 40 separate sampling points--spatially distri-
buted so that equal areas of the stack cross section were sampled for
equal amounts of time (see Table IV). Samples for S0r> and NO analysis
^ X
were collected from a point at a distance of 30 in. from the inside wall
of the stack. The integrated gas samples for Orsat analysis were collected
from a point 2-3 in. from the inside stack wall.
13
-------
•40 FT
4 FT
SAMPLING
POINT
T
SIDE VIEW OF
BOILER FEED LINE
TT
SAMPLING LEVEL
13 FT 10 IN.
SIDE VIEW OF
BOILER STACK
Figure 2 - Location of Sampling Station
-------
TABLE IV
SAMPLING POINTS IN CO BOILER STACK. STANDARD OIL OF CALIFORNIA
COMPANY, EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
Point
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ITS/
IBS/
19^/
20^
Inside Diameter - 166 in.
Distance From
Inside Wall
(in.)
2-1/8
6-3/8
11-1/8
16
21-3/8
27-3/8
33-3/4
41-1/2
50-7/8
64-1/4
102
115
124-1/4
132-1/8
Calculated
139-1/2
142-7/8 144-5/8
146-1/4 150
149-3/4 154-7/8
152-1/4 159-5/8
154-3/4 163-7/8
Distance From
Outside Port
(in.)
13-5/8
17-7/8
22-5/8
27-1/2
32-7/8
38-7/8
45-1/4
53
62-3/8
75-3/4
113-1/2
126-1/2
135-3/4
143-5/8
Calculated
151
154-3/8
157-3/4
161-1/4
163-3/4
166-1/4
156-1/8
161-1/2
166-3/8
171-1/8
175-3/8
a/ Due to length of port extension we were unable to reach past 155 in.
inside the stack so these values were decreased to compensate for
this.
15
-------
VI. PROCESS OPERATIONS
This section is to be prepared by EPA.
16
-------
VII. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Farticulates
For the particulate sampling, the Research Appliance Company*
Model 2343 "Staksamplr" equipment was used. The sampling train meets the
specification of the Federal Register, 36, 17 August 1971. Otherwise,
the procedures for sampling and analysis of particulates conform to the
methods specified in the Federal Register.
The network of sampling points at the particulate station has
been described earlier in this report. The number of points on a traverse,
the sampling time at each point, and the sequence in which points were
sampled were worked out in consultation with the EPA Field Officer. Pre-
liminary measurements were made at the stack location to determine the
approximate temperature and velocity profiles along each traverse. Also,
a gas sample was passed through an ice cooled condenser attached to the RAG
umbilical cord, for the purpose of determining the approximate moisture in
the stack gases.
B. Nitrogen Oxides
The equipment and procedures used for the collection of samples
of nitrogen oxides and subsequent chemical analysis are those which are
described in the Federal Register.
* Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
17
-------
C. Sulfur. Dioxide
The equipment and procedures used for the collection of sulfur
dioxide samples and their subsequent analysis are essentially the same
as those specified in the Federal Register. The gas sampling train for
sulfur dioxide, which deviates from the train design that is specified in
the Federal Register, is shown in Figure 3. This train design was approved
by EPA prior to the test. The calculation method was accordingly modified
"by using the meter pressure instead of barometric pressure. The rate of
sampling was controlled by adjusting a micrometer valve which acted as a
critical orifice. The sampling rate was set at a constant value for any
testing period.
D. Integrated Gas Samples
The equipment and procedure used for the collection of a cumula-
tive or integrated gas sample are essentially the same as specified in the
Federal Register. The gas sampling train, which deviates from the train
design that is specified on the Register, is shown in Figure 4. This train
design was approved by EPA prior to the test. The rate of sampling was
controlled by adjusting a micrometer valve which acted as a critical ori-
fice. The sampling rate was set at a constant value for any testing period,
such that a total volume of gases between 1 and 2 cu ft were collected.
Analyses for carbon dioxide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide were
performed in the field within a few hours after the sampling was completed
using an Orsat apparatus.
18
-------
E. CO Analysis
A Beckman nondispersive infrared spectrophotometer, with a maximum
scale reading corresponding to a 150 parts per million of carbon monoxide,
was used for the determination of carbon monoxide in the integrated gas
samples collected from the stack. The instrument was modified by install-
ing 15.5 in. CO and reference cells and optical filters. The optical
filter removed all interference from ammonia. The instrument was calibrated
by using pure nitrogen as the zero gas and reference standards of 22, 41,
and 83 ppm CO in nitrogen. It was also calibrated by Beckman when they
installed the new cells and filters. C02 at the levels (9-10$) found in
the stack gases interferes with the analysis and gives high readings for
CO. We purchased a standard CO^ (9-11$) gas and made several runs to
determine the correction. The correction of 10 ppm CO was subtracted from
the reading detemiined in analyzing the stack gases for CO. The gas stream
to the EDIR was dried before analysis was made, so all CO analyses were
performed on a dry gas. Figure 5 shows the analytical setup.
19
-------
SAMPLE
INTAKE
FILTER
PROBE
ICE-COOLED
SCRUBBER AND
CONDENSER
ro
o
DRYING
TUBE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
PUMP
Figure 3 - SOP Sampling Train
-------
RATE METER
SAMPLE
INTAKE
FILTER
ro
Al
C(
PROBE ^
R-COOLED
DNDENSER
FVl to
IxvJ *"
VALVE
TEDLAR
BAG —
VACUUM
GAUGE
PURGE LINE
VALVE
FLOW
CONTROL
VALVE
VACUUM
PUMP
RIGID
AIR-TIGHT
CONTAINER
Figure 4 - Integrated Gas Sampling Train
-------
Air Pressure
Gas Flow
Integrated
Gas Bag
Flow
Meter
Nondispersive
Infrared Analyzer
Drying
Tube
Filter
Figure 5 - CO Analysis Train
22
-------
F. Moisture in the Feed Line
The equipment and procedures used for the determination of the
moisture content of the feed line gases are essentially the same as speci-
fied in the Federal Register. The gas sampling train, which deviates from
the train design that is specified in the Register, consisted of copper
tubing which connected the sample valve to an ice cooled condenser followed
by a silica gel drying tube and a dry test meter. Gas flow was caused by
the positive pressure which existed in the feed duct. This train design
was approved by EPA prior to the test.
23
-------
APPENDIX A
PARTICULATE RESULTS
Table A-I lists the complete results of the particulate tests.
Table A-II lists the equations for the calculations. Also shown in Table
A-II are example calculations for Run No. 1. Table A-III lists the input
data for the particulate runs. The excess CC>2 and OQ are in error for
Runs 1, 2, and 3. The probe used to collect the integrated sample for
02) and CO was too short and was only in the stack about 2-3 in. The
possibility of air leakage into the probe was great.
The operation of the CO boiler by the refinery was erratic during
Tests Wos. 1, 2, and 4, as evidenced by the organic material collected on
the filters. On Test No. 3, North port, the pitot readings were low during
one half of the time suggesting the possibility of a leak. While changing the
filter on Test No. 2, North port, the sample train was jostled and the
glass connections between the two water impingers were broken. These two
impingers were carefully transported to the field laboratory and replaced
by two new water impingers. The material from all four water impingers
was saved and analyzed.
24
-------
TABLE A-I
PARTICIPATE EMISSION! DATA
N3
Ul
ON
TT
P8
P-<*
VM
TM
VMSTO
VW
VWV
PMOS
MD
PCO?
P02
CO
Pfv.2
MWD
MW
CP
DPS
TS
NP
PST
PS
VS
AS
QS
QA
PERI
B
MF
MT
1C
CAM
CAO
CAT
CAU
Ct»t
CAX
EA
)cSCRI JTloN
O-UE" OF RUN
PRuSE TIP jIAMLTER
NET TIME OF RUN
AVG ORIFICE PRES }ROP
VOL DRY r-,AS-METER CONJD
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL ORY -.JAS-Sr-J CONU
TOTAL H^f) COLLECTED
VOL HdO VAPuR-STD COrjD
PERCENT MOISTURE. BY VOL
MOLE PP. ACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02 BY VOL. DRY
PEKCENT 02 dY VOL. DRY
COiMC OF CO « OP-Y
PEKCENT N2 BY VOL. DRY
MOLECULAR WT-DRY 5TK GAS
MOLECULAR wl-STK 5AS
PITDT TUBE COEFFICIENT
AVG STK VELOCITY HEAD
AVG STACK TEMPERATURE
MET SAMPLING POINTS
STATIC PRES OF STACK
ST«CK PRESSURE. ABSOLUTE
AVG STACK GAS VFLOCITY
STACK APEA
ST^ FLOWRATc., L)RY,STL) CN
ACTUAL STACK FLOdRATE
PF«CEi\'T IS'JKINETIC
»N1SO CORRECTION FACTOR
PARTICULATE-: *T-PARTIAL
'-'ARriCULttTt. rt'T-TOTAL
r-ERC I^PIMGER CATCH
Pa-^T. LOAU-WTL.STD CM
PAKT. L'.)AO-TTL.STD CN
PAKT. LOA:>-PTL»STK CN
PA;-
-------
TABLE A-II
EXAMPLE PARTICIPATE CALCULATIONS
"1. VOLUME OF DRY GAS" SAMPLED"A.T STANDARD CONDITIONS
17.71*VM*(P9 + PM/13.6) __
TM + 460. -,
17.71* 76.4b*(?9.97+ .81b/13.6)
= 74.63 DSCF
84.8+460.
~27~"VOLUME'OF WATER VAPOR AT STANDARD'CONDITIONS
VWV = 0.0474*VW = 0.0474* 517.0 = 24.51 SCF
~3i" PERCENT MOISTURE IiM STACK- GAS " '" " ~
100.*VWV ' 100.* 24.51
•PMOS" =- '• = •—— • ™=- 24.7-PERCENT
VMSTD+VWV 74.63+ 24.51
"4.' 'MOLE FRACTION OF DRY STACK GAS "
.-PiviOS 100.- 24.7
: = _ • - .753
100. 100.
5."" AVERAGE MOLECULAR w/EISHT OF DRY STACK GAS "
M'.r'D = (PC02 » 44/100) + (P02 * 32/100)
+(PN2+PCO * 28/100)
= ( 7.0 * 44/100) + (12.4 * 32/100)
+ (80.6 * 28/100) ~
= 29.62
MOLECULAR I/EIGHT OF STACK GAS
.753 + 18»(1- .753) = 26.74
26
-------
TABIiE A-II (Continued)
1. STACK GAS VELOCITY AT STACK CONDITIONS
VS = 4360* SORT(OPS* (TS+460)) *
= 4360* SQRT( ,549*( -738.9+460))
*SQKT(l/(29.93* 26.74)) = 3929 FPM
'8V"'STACK' GAS" VOLUMETRIC FLOW AT STANDARD CONDITIONS'* DRY BASIS
0. 123*VS*AS*MD*PS
TS+460
0.123* 3929* 21629* .753*29.93
738.9 +460
. .... ... ... _ 196403 DSCFM
9. STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW AT STACK CONDITIONS
QS * (TS + 460) "
QA =
-- 17.71 * PS * MD
196403*( 738.9 + 460) -' ~ ~
- 590164 ACFM
17.71*29.93* .7b3
10. DESCENT ISOKINETIC ANJD ANISO CORRECTION FACTOR
PERI =
VS*TT*PS*HO*(DN*DN)
1032*( 738.9+460)* 74.63 ~ — ~
- 104.3 PERCENT
3929«- 160.0*29.93* .7S3* .250 " " ' "" — ^
* .250
. 1.000
27
-------
TABLE A-II (Continued)
PARTrcutrATE-L'OADING ---PROBE-* CYCLONE* AND FILTER"
(AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CAN =--0.0154 * (MF/VMSTD) * B" " ""
'= 0.0154*( 219.65/ 74.63)*1.000 "= .04555 GR/DSCF
12. °ARTICJLATE LOADING — TOTAL
" - (AT' STANDARD CONDITIONS)
CAO = 0.0154 * (MT/VMSTD) * B
= 0.0154*( 663.43/ 74.63)*!.000
.13744 GR/DSCF
•~13~.~" PASTICULATE LOADING -- PROBE* CYCLONE, AND FILTER
_ (AT STACK CONDITIONS)
17.71*CANI*PS*MD
CAT = "' --- ' "~
TS+460
17.71* .0455*29.93* .753
_ . . _ _ .01515 GR/ACF
733.9+460
••14.- '-PARTICULATE LOADING — TOTAL ' —
(AT STACK CONDITIONS)
_ --i7.7i
CAIJ =
"~ ' ' TS + 450
17.71* .1374*29.93* .753 '" - -
= = .04571 GR/ACF
'738.9 + 460 --" ~
28
-------
TABLE A-II (Concluded)
15. PARTICIPATE EMISSION RATE
— PRO*E» CYCLONE* AND FILTER
CAW"" = '"O.OOb57*CAN«QS
= O.OObS?* .0455* 196403
76.63 L8/HR
16. OAPTICULATE EMISSION RATE
_ „-TOTAL--
CAX _=_ O.UOb57»CAO»QS
= 0.00837* .1374* 196403
T7. "PERCE'nT" EXCESS'AlR "AT SAMPLING POINT
100. * (P02-0.5»PCO)
0.264*PN2-P02+0.5»PCO
100. *(12.4-0.5* 0.0)
0.264*b0.6-12.4*0.5* 0.0
231.23 L8/HR
139.7 PERCENT
29
-------
TABLE A-III
PANICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
"TEMP
(DG.F) (
60.0
PORT-
" POINT"
'vl 1
N 2
N 3
Ki 4
N 5
N 6
M 7
N a
N 9
—" N"~ 1 0 "
N 11
— NT 12"~
N 13
N 15
:N~ 16 "
N 17
" N 18
N 19
-NT20' "
W 1
~ W 2
W 3
~~ W 4
W 5
ATMOS
PRES
l.HG)
29.97
SAMP
TIME "
M I N )
4.00
4.00 '
4.00
4.00 ~
4.00
4.00
4.00
4 . 0 0 ~
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00 "
4.00
4.00 "
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
STACK
VAC
(I.H20
.50
METER
VOL
(OCF)
131.40
132. H2
134.48
136.23
138.00
139.63
141.63
143.47
145.33
147.22
149.14
151.24
153.27
155.44
157.66
159.88
162.13
164.41
166.72
168.94
170.54
172.29
174.12
176.00
177.90
Ri.
H20
'CONO
) (ML)
517.0
DELTA
' ' P
(I.H20)
.325
.365
.390
.440
.455
".470
.450
' .465
.480
.495
.555
.600
.675
.710
.730
' .760
.810
.760
.770
.740
.460
.490
.520
!575
JN- '
PARTIC
-••-WT-PTL
(MG)
219.85
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.493
.550"
'. .5S6
' " .665
.680
~" .708
.678
" .700
.723
.734
.823
.888
1.000
"1.050
1.090
1.140
1.200
1.140
1.145
1.100
.690
.730
.755
.790
.830
1 DATE- 12-14-71
PARTIC STACK INIT
"" "WT-TTL " AREA "" VOL " "
(MG) (FT2) (DCF)
663.43 150.20 1
TEMP TEMP TRAIN
IN OUT VAC
(D.F) (D.F) (l.HG)
59.0 '59.0 3.5
63.0 •'
74.0
76.0
62.0
85.0
89.0
91.0
92.0
93.0 "
94.0
95.0
96.0
98. o:
100.0
102.0 ;
103.0
104.0 '
104.0
106.0
62.0
69.0
78.0
86.0
93.0
b9.0
60.0
61.0
62.0
65.0
66.0
68.0
70.0
71.0
73.0
75.0 '
75.0
76.0
77.0
77.0
78.0
79.0 ~
79.0
80.0
62.0
63.0
64.0
65.0
67.0
J.b
4.0
4.0
4.0 .
4.0
4.5
-4.5 "
4.5
5.0
5.b
6.0
7.5
8.0 ~
9.5
10.0
10.5
10.5-
11.0
10.0
11.0
13. b
15.0
14.5
14.5
30.09
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
720.0
725.0
730.0
734.0
732.0
733.0
734.0
737.0
737.0
733.0
730.0
731.0
723.0
724.0
726.0
726.0
727.0
725.0
725.0
724.0
757.0
772.0
774.0
783.0
778.0
PERC F
"02
DRY
12.4
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
~65.0
67.0
68.0
68.0
69.0
70.0
"70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
70.0
' 70.0
68.0
66.0
66.0
66.0
64.0
>ERC PE
C02 C
DRY D
7.0 0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
' .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
RC PITOT
0 " TUBE
RY COEF
.0 .850
VEL
(FPM)
3016.6
3203.6
3318.5
3b30.7
3587.4
3647. b
3570.6
3634.2
3692.3
3743.3
3958.7
4117.8
4352.9
4466.2
4532.5
4624.7
4776.4
4622.7
4653.0
4559.5
3644.6
3784.7
3902.0
4027.6
4109.8
-------
O)
H
TABLE A-III (Continued)
RUN- 1 DATE- 12-14-71
PO^T- SftMP
POI
W
" fl"
•V
-IT"
W
"Vf
W
~ w'
w
"17
'"<
~',y
iV
~'!'i "
W
MT
(
6
7
8
9~
10
11
12
13
14
15 —
15
17-
18
19
20
TIME
" I -M )
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
"H.OU
4.00
METER
VOL
(OCF)
179.78
181.54
183.54
185.34
137.1b
183.91
190.71
" 192.65
194.60
196.54
193.60
'"200.51
202.57
21)4.54
206.55
DELTA
P
(I.. -120)
.565
.470
.475
.440
.480
.4^0
.540
.550
.550
.540
.530
.570
.580
' .540
.560
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.820
.675
.684
.660
.716
.675
.805
.815
.815-
' '•• .805'
.870
.850
.870
.805
.870
TEMP
' IN
(D.F)
98.0
102.0
104.0
107.0
108.0
110.0
111.0
112.0
114.0
114.0
116.0
117.0
117.0
117.0
117.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
69.0
70.0
72.0
74.0
76.0
78.0
80.0
81.0
82.0
" 84.0
85.0
85.0
87.0
88.0
88.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
14.0
13.0
14.0
13.5
14.0
14.0
14.5
14.5
15.0
15.0
15.0
14.5 -
14.5
13.5
14.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
768.0
753.0
747.0
744.0
758.0
753.0
748.0
746.0
742.0
734.0
728.0
725.0
723.0
719.0
735.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
62.0
63.0
63.0
64.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
• 65.0
65.0
65.0
PROBE
T OIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
4057.5
3678.0
3688.3
3545.4
3724.6
3598.9
3934.2
3967.2
3960.6
3911.4
4043.5
4003.4
4034.9
3886.7
4055.3
-------
TABLE A-III (Continued)
PARTICIPATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
RUN-
ro
ATMOS ATMOS STACK H20
TEMP PRES •" VAC • -COND
(OG.F) (I.HG) (I.H20) (ML)
PARTIC
WT-PTL'
(MG)
2"DATE- 12-15-71
PARTIC STACK INIT PERC PERC PERC PITOT
WT-TTL AREA VOL " 02 " C02 " CO TUBE"
(MG) (FT2) (DCF) DRY DRY DRY COEF
60.
0
P09T-
— POI
W
«'•*)
•A!
W~
W
v?~
W
•.«r~
1,1
!«
-------
TABLE A-III (Continued)
RUN- 2 DATE- 12-15-71
PORT-
~POi'
M
" N
i\l
~N~
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
"NT
N
1\T
M
NT"
(
8
"7
8
-9 —
10
11
12
1 3""
14
15'"
15
17""
18
19 "
20
SAMP
TIME'
M I N )
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
ti.OO
METER
VOL
(OCF)
273.84
27o.33
278.80
" 281.23
283.89
286.63
289.55
" 292.66
295.76
"293.91
302.09
" 305.23
303.36
" 311.49
314.68
DELTA
' P
(1.H20)
.450
.460
.440
" .455
.490
' .535
.600
.7SO
.7bO
.760
.750
' .720
.710
.700
.690
DELTA
H "
(I.H20)
.630
.640
.613
.630
.675
.800
.825
1.020
1.070
.1.040
1.020
.980
.970
.960
.945
TEMP
IN"
(D.F)
79.0
80.0
80.0
"82.0"
69.0
79.0-'
88.0
95.0 '
96.0
102.0
104.0
105.0
107.0
106.0
106.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
65.0
66.0
68.0
68.0
68.0
69.0
71.0
73.0
75.0
77.0
79.0
80.0
83.0
85.0
86.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG
16.5
18.0
19.5
"23.0
3.0
" 4.2
4.5
5.0
5.1
~ 5.1
5.5
5.5
5.5
•' 5.5
5.6
STACK
TEMP
) (D.F)
727.0
" 730.0
733.0
"731.0
748.0
751.0
752.0
752.0
753.0
" 749.0
747.0
743.0
738.0
740.0
738.0
BOX
TEMP
(D.F)
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
"60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
~ .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
~ .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
"VEL"~
(FPM)
3543.9
3587.6
3513.1
3569.5
3730.6
4081.3
4135.0
4623.1
4716.6
4648.0
4613.5
4512.8
4472.0
4444.1
4408.6
-------
TABLE A-III (Continued)
PARTICIPATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
en
ATMOS
~TEMP -'
(DG.F)
65.0
PQRT-
— POINT
N 1
jq p- •
N 3
• ig~ "4 '
N 5
— N— & -
IM 7
N 8""
Ki 9
M 10
N 11
'
-------
u\
TABLE A-III (Continued)
RUN,- 3 DATE- 12-16-71
PORT-
"POINT
W 6
--/- -?
W 8
— W — 9
V 10
~rn
»l 12
~W~13
W 14
~S~1 5
W 16
-¥"17
W 18
~iri'9
to 20
SAMP
TIME
( M I N )
3.0U
~ 3.00
3.00
~ 3 . 0 0
3.00
~3.00
3.00
~ 3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
"T3.00
3.00
"'3. '00
3.00
METER DELTA
' VOL
(OCF
349.
351.
352.
"354.
355.
"357.
358.
~ 359.
361.
"362.
364.
" 365.
367.
" 355.
37 U.
) (I.
91
35' '
64
38 ~-
79
15
50
92
2b
73 —
17
65-
15
59
00
"P •
H20)
.580
.560
.570
.550
.530
.480
.490
.530
.580
.560
.570
.630
.590
.570
.520
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.800
.775
.785
.760
.732
.673
.688
' ".735
.800
.775
.785
.870
.820
' .785
.728
TEMP
' IN
(D.F)
102.0
105.0
110.0
111.0
112.0
112.0
114.0
115.0
116.0
117.0
118.0
119.0
120.0
122.0
121.0
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
80.0
81.0
82.0
"84.0
84.0
85.0
87.0
86.0
88.0
"~ 89.0
89.0
90.0
91.0
91.0
92.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG)
1.5
1.5
1.5
-1.5 "
4.2
4.0
4.2
""4.5
5.0
5.0 '
5.0
""5.3
5.2
"5.0
5.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
734.0
738.0
734.0
738.0
737.0
733.0
732.0
731.0
733.0
726.0
725.0
725.0
727.0
729.0
720.0
BOX
TEMP-
(D.F)
65.0
65.0
65.0
' 65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
~ 65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
PROSE
.T DIA"
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
~ .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
~ .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
" VEL"
(FPM)
3972.3
3909.7
3937.9
3874.6
3801.9
3612.1
3648.0
3792.4
3970.6
389 O.r
3923.0
4124.3
3994.6
3929.6
3739.1
-------
J
en
TABLE A-III (Continued)
PARTICULATE DATA AND CALCULATED VALUES
ATMOS
TEMP
(DG.F)
60.0
PORT-
—POTNT
W 1
nT 2
W 3
W 4
VI 5
W 5
W 7
~W "8
W 9
W TO'
W 11
W '12
W 13
" Id 1 4
W 15
W" 16
tf 17
' W""18
t-/ 19
- i,r • 2 o
M 1
— N 2
N 3
— - N 4
N 5
ATMO:
'- PRtS
(l.HG
•" " " ' RU
5 STACK H20
' ' VAC COND "
) (I.H20) (ML)
30.40 .bO 404.0
SAMP
' ~TIMt
( l-i I N )
3.00
• '3.00
3.00
" 3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
-~3.00
3.00
"- 3.00
3.00
" 3.00
3.00
3 . 0 0
3.00
3.00
3.00
"3.00
3.00
3. 00
. 3.00
'3.00
3.00
3. no
3;0u
METER
VOL "
(DCF)
371.46
- 372.71
374.06
375.47
376.88
376.29
379.71
3*1.16
• 3H2.59
333.97
385.33
386.67
388.03
" 389.43
390.87
392.30
393.75
395.16
396.62
398.02
399.01
400.07
401.21
402.41
403.65
DELTA
... p _
( J.H20)
.340
~" .500'
.570
.590
.580
.620
.610
"~ .630
.590
' '• .560
.540
.510
.550
" .570"
.620
.590
.610
- .570
.600
~ .550
' .240
.350
.380
.420
.440
IM-
PARTI
" "V/T-PT
(MG)
228.3
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.478
• .692
.790
.820
.810
" .850
.840
.670
.820
.780
.752
' ~ .712
.760
" .790
.850
.820
.840
- - .790
.830
.780
. .342
.490
.530
.580
.625
4 DATE- 12-16-71
C PA
L" "WT
(
5 61
TEMP
- -IN •
, (D.F)
62.0
64.0
70.0
74.0
78.0
82.0
85.0
— 87.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
91.0
91.0
93.0
94.0
'•' 94.0
95.0
- 96.0
98.0
98.0
64.0
' 68.0
72.0
75.0
80.0
RTIC !
-TTL"
MG)
STACK ]
AREA"'"
(FT2) 1
:NIT
VOL" '
IDCF)
9.46 150.20 370.35
TEMP
OUT
(D.F)
62.0
- 62.0
63.0
62.0
63.0
"64.0
65,0
~ 66.0
67.0
68.0
69.0
70.0
72.0
""73.0
74.0
75.0
76.0
- 76.0
77.0
" 78.0
66.0
67.0
66.0
68.0
68.0
TRAIN
VAC "
(l.HG)
3.0
3.6' "
4.0
" 4.1 -
4.2
4.2
4.1
"''4.1
4.1
4.1"
4.0
" 4.0
4.0
' 4.3
4.5
4.5 '
4.7
•— - 4.5 -
4.9
- 4.8
3.0
3.5
3.5
4.0
4.0
STACK
TEMP
(D.F)
700.0
723.0
72B.O
733.0
728.0
735.0
734.0
734.0
736.0
731.0
733.0
732.0
735.0
"739.0
736.0
733.0
735.0
734.0
730.0
730.0
700.0
707.0
731.0
735.0
738.0
PERC 1
"" 02
DRY
3.8
BOX
•" TEMP
(D.F)
64.0
64.0
64.0
' 64.0
64.0
64.0
64.0
' 64.0
64.0
' 64.0
64.0
64.0
65.0
— 65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
- 65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
PERC PI
C02 " i
DRY 1
13.1
PROBE
T DIA
(IN)
.250
~ .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
' .250
.250
.250
.250
-"-.250
.250
- .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
- .250
.250
.250
.250
ERC PITOT
CO TUBE
DRY COEF
0.0 .850
VEL
(FPM)
3018.5
3696.6
3955.2
4032.4
3989.7
4137.2
4101.9
4168.6
4037.5
3925.3 ~~
3857.8
3747.5
3896.6
3973.5
4138.9
4032.4
4103.7
3965.2
4061.4
3923.6
2536.0
3071.8
3233.5
3405.1
3489.6
-------
TABLE A-III (Concluded)
'RU.M- 4 DATE- 12-16-71
POPT-
POINT "
N 6
~T>l~'7~
N 3
M 9
N 10
N~l 1""
N 12
N 13
N 14
N Ib
N 16
NT17
N 13
— sri9~
M 20
SAMP
TINE
( M I N )
3.00
"3.00
3.00
"3.00* '"
3.00
3.00"
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
~3. 00"
3.00
"3.00 ~
3.00
METER
VOL "
(DCF)
4-04.91
406.16
407.39
406.63
410.10
411.43
41^.64
414.26
415.76
'417.30"
418.87
420.45
422.04
423.60
425. IB
DELTA
P
(I.H20)
.450
.430
.420
,455"
.490
"" .560
.620
.670
.690
. /30
.770
.750
.730
.740
.740
DELTA
H
(I.H20)
.630
.605
.585
'" .640
.685
.755
.831
.895
.930
.980
1.030
.995
.980
' .985
.985
TEMP
" IN
(D.F)
82.0
64.0
85.0
"• 86.0
88.0
90.0
92.0
"" 93.0
96.0
"93.0"
100.0
102.0
103.0
102.0
104.0
TEMP
" OUT
(D.F)
70.0
70.0
70.0
~70.0
72.0
72.0
74.0
74.0
75.0
" "75.0
76.0
77.0
78.0
" 78.0
80.0
TRAIN
VAC
(I.HG
4.0
4.2
4.2
4.8
5.2
"" 8.0
9.5
12.2
15.0
— IT. 5
19.0
"20.0
21.0
21.1
13.0
STACK
TEMP
) (D.F)
738.0
736.0
737.0
"737.0
741.0
744.0
741.0
" 743.0
742.0
741.0
739.0
738.0
739.0
"" 737.0
731.0
BOX
" TEMP
(D.F)
65.0
65.0
65.0
"65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
"65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
65.0
' 65.0
65.0
PROBE
T 01 A"
(IN)
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
' .250
.250
.250
.250
.250
.250
VEL
(FPM)
3529.0
3446.9
3408.0
3547.1
3687.2
3946.7 ~J
4147.5 '
4315.1
4377.2 '
4500.4
4618.3
4556.0
4496.7
4523.6"
4512.3
-------
APPENDIX B
GASEOUS RESULTS
The results of the testing for NOX and SOg in the stack gases are
shown in Tables B-I through B-VI. These tables also include the raw field
data and example calculations.
The results of the moisture and Orsat analyses of samples from
the feed line location and the Orsat analyses of samples from the stack
location were presented in Section III of this report. The equations for
moisture calculations are included in Table A-II. Gas concentrations
determined by Orsat analysis required no additional calculations. The
results of the CO analysis of the stack gases, as determined by a Beckman
nondispersive infrared spectrophotometer, were given in Table II, Section
III, in this report.
38
-------
TABLE B-I
to
PI
TI
PF
TF
VSC
M
CNO.X
OF.SCk t^T [oi-,
0 ?• T f
p.'Vvr
POINT
V 0 L i.' 1-11 - - F !„. S> •«• v a I.. V:. - ft H
l-:\i!T. AnS. P:-;tS.--Fl
[MIT. A«S. it.|v'H.--FLASK
Fli'MAL- AdS. TchP.—FLASK
SAMP. VOL.-STI.'. CM* L)
'"'AbS OF MOff IN SA'-iHi
CO-JC. OF ^Qx. AS i\.Q2
i,'Ml TS
>'L
FJ.hf-,
i)FG. y
KM . HG
OF'j.K
ML
1-Nl 2-NI
12-14-71 12-15-71
N N
6 H
2092.00 2116.0 u
3.30 3.20
522.0 b24.0
29.99 30.04
524.0 524.0
1886.63 1923.49
2-N2
12-15-71
N
6
2076.00
3.20
524.0
2o.99
524.0
1809.93
2-N3
12-15-71
w
6
2056.00
2.90
530.0
30. OQ
524.0
1*92.08
2-M4
12-15-71
W
6
2083.00
2.90
524.0
30.09
524.0
1914.62
0 0 . 0
4.30.0
380.0
450.0
L^/OSCF .00001115 ,OOu013Bt> .00001473 .U0001245 .00001457
-------
TABLE B-I (Concluded)
NAME
VF-VA
PI
TI
PF
TF
VSC
M
CMOX
DESCRIPTION
DATE
PO*T
POiK'T
UMIT5
VOLUME — FLSK + V 4LVE-AR. SOLN ML
1NIT. AhJS. PKt-,3. — FLASK
INIT. AHS. TEMP. — FL4S*.
FINAL ArtS. Prttb. — FLASK
FINAL A«S. TEMP. — FLASK.
SAMP. VOL..-STO. CM. DRY
MASS OF MO? I'M SAMPLE
COixiC. OF MOX AS NO 2
IM.HG
DFG.H
IM.HG
QFG.R
ML
^IICROGH
LB/DSCF
3-M1
12-16-7'!
M
6
20rt4.00
2.80
538.0
29.90
524.0
1914.33
530.0
.00001717
3-N2
12-16-71
N
6
2U88.00
2.50
532.0
29.65
524.0
1919.04
610.0
.00001971
3-N3
12-16-71
N
6
2094.00
3.20
529.0
29.90
524.0
1892.18
510.0
.00001671
4-N1
12-16-71
W
6
2033.00
2.80
526.0
30.50
526.0
1943.11
550.0
.00001755
4-N2
12-16-71
W
6
2092.00
2.20
522.0
29.65
526.0
1932.71
510.0
.00001636
-------
TABLE B-II
:\")X
IMIT. ->aKt.) I MIT. FLASK FINAL BAPO FINAL FLASK
T£ST PK^SSUHF VACUUM • PKtLSSUKF VACUUM
(IN.HG) (IN.HG) (IN.HG) (IN.HG)
0.00
-. 10
1.00
-.10
-.10
.DO
.7b
.50
-.10
.75
1-Nl
2 -Ml
2-.V2
2--M 3
2-h4
3-Nl
3--J2
3-N3.
4 -'••!!
4-:.! £
3 f i . 0 0
3 U . 0 ' •
3 0 . i ) 0
30.00
3 0 . 0 0
30. 30
30.30
30.30
30.40
3 0 . 4 u
26.70
26.^0
26.60
27. 10
27.10
27.50
27.80
27.10
27.60
2H.20
2«.99
29.99
29.99
29.99
29.99
30.4-0
30.40
30.40
30.40
30.40
-------
TABLE B-III
EXAMPLE NOX CALCULATIONS
1. SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS* DRY BASIS
VSC
530 * (VF-VA)
------- „
29.92
PF
TF
PI
TI
ro
PF PI
17.71 * (VF-VA) * ( - )
TF TI
29.99 3.30
17.71 * ( 2092.00) * ( )
524.0 522.0
2. CONCENTRATION OF NOX AS N02
1886.63 ML
M 1
CNOX = *
VSC 1.6 *
M
VSC
0.000062
400.0
18W6.63
0.000062
= .00001315 L6/SCF
-------
TABLE B-TV
S02 OAT A
NAME
DESCRIPTION
UNITS
VM
TM
MM
VMSTQ
VT
VT5
N
VSOLM
VA
CS02
DATE
PORT
POIMT
VOL. OF DRY GAS-METER CN. CU.FT
AVb. DRY 045 KETE3 TEMP. DEG.R
AVG. ABS. METLR PRES. IN.HG
VOL. OF ORY GAS-STO. CN. CU.FT
VOL. OF TI TRANT-SAMPLE ML
VOL. OF TIT«ANT-A3S.bL4NK ML
NORMALITY OF tlTRANT G-EU/L
TTL. SOLUTION VOLJME ML
VOL. SAMP. ALIQUOT TITc-D ML
COiMC. OF S0
147/148
2.07
520.00
30.05
2.12
7.80
.80
.00960
100.0
10.0
00002?33
3-S1
12-16-71
N
6
149/150
1.64
525.00
30.36
1.6b
14.20
.60
.00960
100.0
10.0
.00005476
4-S1
12-16-71
4
6
151/152
.68
516.00
30.40
.71
7.00
.60
.00960
100.0
10.0
.00006095
-------
TABIxE B-V
502 RAW DATA
TEST
2-S1
3-S1
4-S1
INIT.ORY
TEST MTR.
(CU.FT)
5.165
7.944
10.735
FINAL DRY
TEST MTR.
(CJ.FT)
7.238
9.585
11.416
BARO.
PRES.
(IN.HG)
30.05
30.36
30.40
METER
VACUUM
(IN.HG)
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-VI
EXAMPLE SO? CALCULATIONS
1. VOLUME OF DRY GAS SAMPLE THROUGH THE DRY GAS METER
(AT STANDARD CONDITIONS)
530 PM
VMSTD = VM » «•
TM P.9.92
VM » PM
= 17.71 *
TM
2.073* 30.05
= 17.71 * = 2.1220 CU.FT.
520.00
2. CONCENTRATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE AT STANDARD CONDITIONS
(VT-VTR)*N*(VSOLN/VA)
CS02 = 0.0000705 * - —
VMSTD
( 7.80- .80)* .00960
*( 100.O/ 10.0)
= 0.0000705 * •
2.1220
= .00002233 LB/CF
-------
APPENDIX C
OPERATION RESULTS
This section is to be prepared by EPA.
46
-------
APPENDIX D
FIELD DATA
This section presents the actual field data from the testing.
47
-------
.3
I
Location
Test_
Date
FIELD MOISTURE DETERMI NATION
Comments:
I
Operator
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure
-.
Clock
Time
jo, y/
/v.$l
Meter
(Ft3)
/ *^ ^^ * \J (i^3
,"%4-Kw^'' /*
..r-
Flov/ Mater
Setting (CFH)
-?r
**
Meter
Temperature, Tin
*iZ I?
•
• •
Tube No.
Weight, grams_ . _.
Final
Initial
:
Difference
(W) = v/eight of moisture collected = / ^J .,<^x^
% Moisture by Volume = 100
-------
. VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant CV^^/^.
Test
•//d. /
Location ^Jl^cL • . •
Date
Opera
Meter
Clock
T i ifi2
f^
I
2' ^
%'<|G?
3'/7
2 . /f
;?
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project Sample Date /^y./V, / 4*7/
Test Team er GS- G' c Test No. /
A. Moisture Content
1. Wet/Dry Bulb Method
Ts (dry) = °F, Ts (vet) = _EF
2.
Moisture content = % by volume
Condenser Method
Vm = 3.?Y cu. ft. Tm = Un
PJJJ = p(atmo) = £
-------
Sampling location
STACK .DATA FOR .'MJGRAPH
.1. Meter AH '
2. Avy« meter tempt (ambient * 20
3. Moisture (volume) /^.zL '. % '
4. Avg. static press. •!• _..~" '""" in. lt,OX.073 = * in. Hg.
I
5'. Bar. press sampling point A f. f? in.Hg +_ >^<<^^(static press in.!{f.]) --
; In. Hg.
6. Bar press of nater. J^f/^7 in. Hg.
inT'Hg
8. Avg. r. tack tempera tu re c ,,' ~7 Jr / . ____ °F.
9. Avg. stack velocity (AP) .^7^? ____ in 1^0. MAX. VELOCITY _ *
C factor (1) ___ i_ ______ _ __ (2)
10. Prohe Tip size
51
-------
'j :. SAMPLE DATA
' EMISSION TEST
Sample Data.
Proj e ct
Test Team &~f g.S f>-c- Test NO. ~T
Point
No.
RAG
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
'Left
Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
Probe
Temp.
3555"
3, 5"
63
7*$
3
7V
f
733
7
4S/1L
?! 33
92,
731
J://
733
73
/J
J'-.SJ'
7^3
70
/xr.
1$
7k
-730
/.-oft?
19*
77
77
/D
n
/&*•/*
7^7
/a
I-IW
A
/OK
79
n
V-/7
•77
//.O
/£?/
7?
A/:2-/
tf-0
v : v~
52
-------
3
6 3 '0
SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Sample Data.
Proj ect __ _
Test Team ff &?• #-c- Test NO. /
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Man.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Commenl
tla
3
y
V.5 I77-WQ3
Ul
77^
®
7^3
07
,7/6
71
no
7?
753
ru
tl
IS.O
M.
6s-
/A/
ry
/I
n
7; /i
in
73J
C-'S"
7/f
4
7 : a
•
53
-------
Date:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET .. ..';..- .1-;:'.. '•
•••'•''•' •'•'• ••:•• Plant: S+2>. ol/ * /"C;3 579
Extra No.
Impinger water residue.D^/^ /
mg
Jmpingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container Mo.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
•
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
;' front'half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No. / ^
Extra No. _ Weight results \O
Total particulate weight
3 £~~ 3
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
-ST/
- o.£>*
<• Filter particulate
weight //3V3-3- mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
'• Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
4.
Moisture total 5~l 7 gm
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments: 0J' &•• &> %
Analyze for:
/)./_
r A'
,/ -A
f~ t~
~r& 6 /*<&
54
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project
Test Team
_Sample Date_
Test No.
E. Qrsat Data
1. Field Run: CO
2. Lab Run: CO
CC2
CO,,
(lab calculations using bulbs)
F. Stack Pressure
Measuring instrument
Inches HgO
(See Test )
G- Probe Tip Diameter
Inches.
H. Define Sample Train
1. Impingers
Normal
2. Probe Length
3. Special:
Initial
Final
Difference
No. 1
(tip) No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
ISO ml.
1BO ml.
Dry
Silica Gel
; r> c")
1 c o
O
2y <,
-------
OPACITY DATA
Location
Date __/
Run
Comments:
Reader
*. r>:
Clock
Time
} / fr'M
/
3
Stack
Opacity %
Clock
Time
Stack
Opacity
NCAP-32 (12/67) .
56
-------
FIELD MOISTURE DETERMINATION
.
1
;'i
'4
I
I
3
•:••*
Loc a t i c n
Test
Date
tSft- j)
Comments:
//
Operator
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure
r /
Clock
Time
&:&*?
06/0
o : ,}o
Meter
(Ft3)
/tsi
2. Wo
J>1X$~ ••-
• \
Flov/ Meter
Setting (CFH)
//e^4r^<^
*" •
Meter
Temperature, Tm
ft'S
Gf'f
c,vr
Tube No.
•
Weight, grams_ . _
Final
Initial
— . •-• -.. , .
—
Difference
V
(W) = \veight of moisture collected =
% Moisture by Volume = 10°'W
f375-PB.Vr
Moisture by Volume =
By Wet and Dry Bulb Temperatures:
Wet Bulb Temp. °F
Dry Bulb Temp. __°F
NCA.P-30 (].2/(i7)
% Moisture From Psychometric Chart
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
IF
t.
Y\.
Material Swnpled for
Date D£C, /%
Plant
Location
Bar. Pressure _
Ambient Ternp. _
Run No. /
i 9^ 7 "Hg Stack Temparature_
*F Stack Dimensions
"7
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes _Nd
Operator /<-
^tfTeGKAJ*-*
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location_
Date
Time
Opera to r_
/?7/
Comments;
A,
Test
(co2)
Reading 1
(o2)
Reading 2
(CO)
Reading 3
NCAP-31 (12/67)
59
-------
$
;".•<
I
Location
Test
Date
FIELD MOISTURE DETERMINATION •
Comments:
. 2-
Operator
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure
Clock
Time
/0:e$
,V : zO
Meter
(Ft3)
• i ' j
2/vu-i**/
^o6.cr
fl'*At
J/2<2J
— . .—
Flow Meter
Setting (CFH)
.?f
••
Meter
Temperature, Tm
b2 <-y
•7? Ot,
•^
-
Tube No.
Weight, grams „ . _
Final
Initial
'•
—
Difference
(W) = v/eight of moisture collected =
% Moisture by Volume'= 10°'W
% Moisture by Volume =
/
i
I *
\
375.0 .u
_JL_m
+ 460
..
W
By Wet and Dry Bulb Temperatures:
Wet Bulb Temp. °f % Moisture From Psychometric Chart
Dry Bulb Temp. °F
-30 (12/07) 6Q
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project Sample Date
Test Team f~T £<£ B.C Test No. *S
A. Moisture Content
1. Wet/Dry Bulb Method
Ts (dry) = °P, Ts (vet) = EP
Moisture content = $ by volume
2. Condenser Method
cu. ft. T = _CF Vc =
^ = p(atmo) = ~3&>d^ in. of Eg
•^
Moisture content = ; ^~Tf = 3 y. 7 jo by vol
P,
1 + 375 -r
(See Test )
B. Velocity Profile (Ap = velocity pressure, in.
Measuring instrument (convert to s-shaped)
&p: max. = _ , min. = _ , avg. = . 5~ /Q
See Test .
C. Temperature Profile (Ts)
Measuring instrument _ ___
TS(°F): max. = _ , min. = _ , avg.
See Test J _ .
D. Nomograph Settings
AHref = 1.84 in. of HgO, Tm = %!> °F
% HgO* = QS'. Q , Ps/Pm = t
C = < i , Ap = values from G above
T = 7n? °p, D = ••'ZS^u in.
S ^T — • ' '""' .._---
61
-------
Plant
aiiip 1Ing 1 o c a t i o n_
YA/M-' ti.'vTA r.'>r> " •r>«fi«-n ft T'
Atis l.'/UA run i\u: w.-m.-'i!
.1. Meter AH
n
2. Avg. meter tempt (ambient
3. MoistiiTG (volume)
4. Avg. static press.
in. lt,OX.073
In.
5. Bar. presf; sfifnpling po i n t -4*0. 0^" i n . Kg ^ , O
30, D/33^ In. Hg. .
( s ta t i c press in.i!f|} -
6. Bar press of matcr . "^Q< ®£~ \n. Kg.
r
s" 5. 30f <^/70> in. Hg
8. Avg. stack temperature
9. AVCJ, stack velocity (AP) __ /£"/£>
C factor (1).
in H20. MAX.
(2)
10. . Prchc Tip size
62
-------
I- :. . SAMPLE DATA
! EMISSION TEST
Sample Data.
Project
Test Team fc-T $£. ft. <^ Test NO.
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
n.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
S. Gel
Temp.
Probe
Temp.
F
J75
£1
7°
il
7/7
7-L,
t X*
^
;/:
7*
// !
r
r.f
V 7
I*
75*
73
t-y-
f.v
7V
91
iff
I3-./5
IS'
*&fl
72-
2
n
n
ft
,
1L
63
-------
f— .
I; :. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project Sample Data £~fift(L fc
Test Team f-f. ffC.fiS,,
Test NO. '£,
tj~£\ j
-f ' '
Point
No.
RAC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
Commen1
. O7
;*.
$•//
b7
5-f
/C?"
jr
/O.S
753
J?
SO
.630
75:0
7^7
7
t
733
JC- 720
V
JO
II
,5-^5-
so
£5
7
z,
ft
If
7/07
If
75" -
/03L
7/f
7/7
n
J3L
1T5"
97
&.00
."7
311
'*(,
/x
SP
V
64
-------
Date:
Run number:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
••:•• Plant: STfl tf
Operator: P. 77 &S. //,M
Sample box number:
"/
: . Location of sample port;5T#C-tf
; Barometric pressure: 3 Ot
Ambient temperature:
Ircpinger H20 .
Volume after sampling jf)2£>m\
...... ', M
Impinger prefilled with ty
Volume collected
Container No.. / & &
_ , ,. i/ I
Extra No. /£ /
Ether-chloroform extraction
~"0f impinger v/ater .//^
w K • a - U-L
Impinger water residue < 3
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No. / 5 gr
Extra No. Weight results^
mg
"Very probe and cyclone catch: • Container No. „<_
Extra No.
V/eight results^
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
;• front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No.
Extra Mo.
Weight results t'-£>%%'03 mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
no.
Filter particulat
weight Q. /
Total particulate v/eight
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
'• Weight before test: ':_(<> 0*
Moisture v/eight collected: ^^
Container number: 1. 2,
Moisture total
-Sample number:
Method determination:^
-Comments:
Analyze for:
65
-------
JRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project
Test Team
Sample Date / l~~[ '
Test No. ^3.
'67V/
E. Orsat Data
1. Field Run: CO
2. Lab Run: CO
C02
F. Stack Pressure
Measuring instrument
Inches HgO •
(See Test )
G. Probe Tip Diameter
Inches.
1
H. Define Sample Train
1. Impingers
Normal
Initial
Final
Difference
No. 1
(tip) No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
150 ml. *},?& ® /oo
j-ov/ mi.* ^y t<~, x, i oro
Dry n
Silica Gel <£>&*£
*3S-0- *3o*.
** 0.0-0 ^ /£(>
L^>$3b'
63*^
4-^2—
/4-L-*
2- -2-
2. Probe Length
3. Special:
66
7-0
r<
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date
. / 9~7/
Time &./ f
Ope ra tor
(
Comments:
Test
\
(co2)
Reading 1
Reading 2
(CO)
Reading 3
(A>CU<-D /oo-r
Afo
O.o
in>
' (III
NCA.P-31 (12/07)
67
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN FIELD DATA
Date
Plant S-ld , O't I ol-
Sample Collected By
Run No.
Power Stat Setting
Field Data
Clock time
Flask number
Volume of flask less
correction (liter)
ressure before sampling
Vessure after sampling
in Hg.
Flask temperature, °F
H.Jt
0
(f
n. -i
3.2
/a.
14 S*
IT.- if
n
2.4*6
,/'
/7AT
/z.-; s
z.9
#
ll
,1 +-
NCAP-35 (12/67)
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
Date /Z-/5"-?/
Plant
Bar-.-
OIL.
Location
"Hg Stack Temperature
Ambient Temp.
Run No.
°F Stack Dimensions / 3 / 0
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes
Operator
NCAP-36 (12/67)
CLOCK
TIME
IS7.0
!StS-*»
/-S3/-45
'/53&:a
,54^
/53S/-,
MoS'.oo
I6>u:«>
METER (Ft.3)
5T//^^
5-3^0
5-^z^
> ^7/,9
6 / &
• ^ . '
-------
OPACITY DATA
Location &fV.o//
Date
Run
Reader
Comments:
Clock
Time
/ P
//
*
1
**
if
Stack
Opacity %
/- 20
Clock
Time
Stack
Opacity %
>£>
NCAP-32 (12/67)
70
-------
•a
FIELD MOISTURE DETERMINATION
Location
Test
Date
Comments:
Operator
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure 3 O < O 5
Clock
Time
Meter
(Ft3)
Flov/ Meter
Setting (CFH)
Meter
Temperature, Tm
73
Tube No.
V/eight, grams _
Final
Initial
Difference
(W) = weight of moisture collected =
Z Moisture by Volume = __ 10°'w
Moisture by Volume =
IT. + 460
W
By Wet and Dry Bulb Temperatures: .
Wet Bulb Temp. °F % Moisture From Psychometric Chart
Dry Bulb Temp. °F
NCA.P-30 (12/07) 71
-------
GAS.SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for CO £0^ 0^
Date E>g£ /-C /171
Location
Ambient Ternp.
Run No.
"Hg Stack Temperature_
* Stack Dimensions
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes _ No y
Operato
'NCAP-36 (12/67)
CLOCK
TIME
AKAT*
3-.
Mf
3W
ev
HETF.R (Ft.3)
•JA3<*7
3J,JJo
3$ a ^X
2*.ol/
23 r^o
FLOW KETER
SETTIIiG (CFH)
<3.0o
/.
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date_
Time
^ .(,
— o.o__ /
/t?. ^ Xo
(o2)
Reading 2
-// o /
/f^t b
_'*Qj ^ /*»
(CO)
Reading 3
^3-«_
^> O /o
^j/~} &J
4^U*^D
& ' Ji^~/€>
73
NCAP-31 (12/67)
-------
j. i'f/\i j UH
Location <
Test 3
Date
Comments:
Operator
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure "?£>«
.
Clock
Time
9;*-7
Meter
(Ft3)
*M*> •S/f.&'j
jZ^t 3 70,00
. _ . .^
Flow Meter
Setting (CFH)
,S* (^^
"
Meter
Temperature, Tm
9sT
•
'
"I
Tube No.
•
Weight, grams _ . _
Final
Initial
*
Difference
(V/) = v/eight of moisture collected =
% Moisture by Volume' =
Moisture by Volume =
100-30 (12/07) 74
-------
__v_ Date.
Sanipli\\'j locat'ion__jS;^^^. ;
STACi; DATA FOR nO^OGRAPH: ''' /
.1. Meter Af^ _ . in H20
i . ' . •. • ' • —
2. Av'fj, meter tempt (ambient +.?0° - £r $ ' '
' 3. Moisture (volume)
4. Avg, static press. * „, in. li,OX.073 = + 1n.
tr''(10
5. Bar. press sefnpling point ~30.2<:? in.Hg •<- • ^^ *• (static press
• ' •' ' in. Hg. .:. .... .•'....'•.••• -., •
• *• ' ' . ' r**1
6. Bar press of mater. .7^-^y in. Kg. • ...
Ikj
8. Avg. stack temperature ,' ~? 3S~ . 0F.
9. Avg. stack velocity (iP) •¥ & in H20. MAX. VELOCITY^
- C factor (l)t ^1^ (2)
10. Probe Tip size .05^
75
-------
I T. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project 3
Sample Data .
Test Team/r r.6S &• c Test NO.
_ H.H*
Point
No.
RAC
filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °P
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
°F
loramer
\
J.2
3.Z
— -cLR-J
3
.37
J.2
3 1 7.7;?
723
to
32 140
7/6
1
?22.fe6
7/7
§5
If
.57
,790
H^zviss
723
7C/
13
. 75
77
10 '.&
.(,7-
165
333.%)
fol
/fc
10:12-
7,25-
n
4-0
3^7. /O
Hip
£5
76
-------
I. [. SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Sample Data.
Pro j ect
Test Team>yrA $.&,{.. Test NO. "3
Point
No.
KAC
Filter
Mo.
Sample
Time
Man.
Start
Time
Pitot
in. H0
Probe
in.H20
Vacuvim
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp.
°F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
F
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
F
7/6
Y/07
7?
¥
1,5
V7/2-7£
77
5-7
IS
As-
1
351.3$
73*
.5-7
I/O
.7(,d
til
ry
.73%
.//a
-733
,530
//(*
7,5?
/r
m.
6"
in
I/
(7
•no
/f
JZO
721
-7*
5
739
9%
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
''
Date: / >// £/7/
Run number: v/
Operator: • £"TT. A?3T /~t .
Sample box number: 7
Impinger H£0
Volume after sampling *4ff ^ml
• i —
Impinger prefilled wi ttjjto £> ml
Volume collected 2-EU ml
Jmpingers and back half of
filter, acetone v;ash:
t
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
• '
-
•
M *
i
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Plant: STfr&'/'ofW &/'££°GWD£
Location of sample port: ST/^X
Barometric pressure: 3 O, 3 £
Ambient temperature: ^ 2-
No.. /bfe> «. Ether-chloroform extraction
^"of impinger v/ater , D / 5"^>"V
Impinger water residue , O^4^lc
i
Weight results ,£>O779-'
•— - •
NO. % V. . -..;.-
•
V/eight results
)
mg
Mnq
mg
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
;" front half of filter,
acetone v;ash:
Container No
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
::: . Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
Total particulate weight
Filter particulate
weight /£> 4? £0 r"9
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
• Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1
3.
4.
Moisture total
Sample number:
Method determination:^
Comments;
Analyze for:
78
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project
Test Team
Sample Date/>// 6/7 /
Test No. '.^
E. Orsat Data
1. Field Run: CO
2. Lab Run: CO
C02
(lab calculations using bul
Is)
F. Stack Pressure
Measuring instrument
Inches
(See Test _ )
G- Probe Tip Diameter
Inches.
H. Define Sample Train
1. Impingers
Normal
Initial
2. Probe Length
3. Special:
Final
Difference
No. 1
(tip) No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
150 ml. / $ O
150 ml. y/0 O
Dry O
Silica Gel /,#£,
5/-5
1(00
y
te)9,<>
2./^>T
6<9
8
/ ^'.^-
79
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Ti me
Operator
/?7/
te/so
ltvp>
h/)/
Test
3
(co2)
Reading 1
(o2)
Reading 2
'3.0
//. &
-/ £> • '
(CO)
Reading 3
30. a
NCAP-31 (12/67)
80
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN FIELD DATA
Date _
Plant
Sample Collected By
Run No:
Power Stat Setting
Field Data
3-70/3
Clock time
Flask number
Volume of flask less
correction (liter)
Pressure before sampling
in Hg.
Pressure after sampling
in Hg.
Flask temperature, °F
JO 10
Z
Z,0£4
30.3
1$
^
7&
)DQ
9
1&&8
2*>,-5
£?•£
2-'<*• 3
^•7./
3-2.
-if-
65
/>/;^
/7//1
i^/fe
•^°? MA* \r&+ I'J^LMn
NCAP-35 (12/67)
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
12.-&>~
Bar. Pressure ^
Ambient Temp. _
Run No. 3
Power StDt Setting
Filter Used: Yes_
Operator
Location £
"Hq Steck Temperature_
°F Stack Dimensions
o
•o
.'V
CLOCK
TIME
METER (Ft.)
2+
8,611*
. ~?o a
FLOW METER
SETTING (CFH)
_Impingars with
METER TEMPERATURE
IN
^L
of
ml of
Total number of Impingers
SampTe Bottle Mo.
Impingsr Bucket No.
Keter Box lie.
A
fit
NCAP-35 (1J5/67)
82
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
Date
Plant
Location
Bar. Pressure
Ambient Ternp.
Run No.
"Hq Stack Temperature
°F Stack Dimensions
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes No
Operato
CLOCK
TIME
\\v-3o
[233
/236
Ii4&
/24£"
h£ 9/2^
f 9 ?5"
^9^
S* C> 3^">^
• o&£>
11*7
FLOW METER
SETTING (CFH)
METER TEMPERATURE
IN
^^
i/9 ^0
/^ ^^^^
&4-
&4~
£<£
^3
/*4-
NCAP-36 (12/67)
Irnping^rs v/ith_
Impingars v;ith
ml of.
ml of
Total number of Impingers
SampTe Bottle No.
Impingsr Bucket No. _._
Kster Box Ho.
83
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
Date
Plant
Bar. Pressure
Ambient Temp.
Run No.
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes Nd_
Operator
Location
"Hq Stack Temperature
°F Stack Dimensions
CLOCK
TIME
METER (Ft.)
FLO1:! METER
SETTING (CFH)
METER TEMPERATURE
IN
Ilio
. 244-
£4-
Irnpingers v/1th_
Impingars with
ml of
ml of
Total number of Impingers
Sample Bottle Mo. __
Impinger Bucket No. _
Meter Box Mo.
NCAP-36 (1P./67)
84
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
Date
Plant
Bar. Pressure
Ambient Temp.
Run No.
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes NO.
Operator
Location
"Hq Stack Temperature
°F Stack Dimensions
CLOCK
TIME
IBS*
METER (Ft.)
t-A&L
r Li
FLOV! METER
SETTK-iG (CFH)
f «P.C
METER TEMPERATURE:
IN
£3
f Irnpirigors vri t'n [
7^ Impi ngers v/i th
_ml of
ml of
Total number of Impingers
Sample Bottle Mo.
iiiig^.i" riuc-!(c4r Ho.
Meter Cox No.
NCAP-36 (12/67)
85.
-------
_ _ OPACITY DATA
Location STflftf 3/2&/X*/- SHc/Of' Comments;
Date /
Run
Reader £W^
Clock
Time
Stack
Opacity %
/ ffll
Clock
Time
Stack
Opacity %
NCAP-32 (12/67)
86
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Mate
ial Sampled for CO C,0^
. /?7(
-mr-.-rr.
Plant
x^
Ambient Temp.
Run No.
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes N0_K
Operator
Location
"Hq Stack Temperature_
£"" ®F Stack Dimensions
CLOCK
TIME
METER (Ft.)
FLO1.'! METER
SETTII-JG (CFH)
METER TEMPERATURE
IN
/to
79
/SO
JrnpingGrs v/itli_
Jnsplngsrs'vnth
ml of
ml of
Total number of Jmpingers
Sample Bottle No.
Irnpinger Bucket No.
Meter Box No.
NCAP-36 (12/67)
87
-------
1 ' - Location F£/?P £/*j£
I-
Test %
Date ft^c.
\ ' /
5 Operator A
By Absorption:
Barometric Pressure
fl^f
/£ /97/
X
30*0
Comments:
1
Clock
Time
/?: /?*
/O./JT An
/&:-(* /?/i
Jo:V^A^
3/ /MfttStffl-
•
Weight, grams _ . _.
Final
/o/.
-------
H.. RAMl'tJS DATA
' EMIOUION TEST
Sample Data.
Pro j ect
Test Team/^7"'/3C £.5" Test NO.
Point
No,
MC
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
F
3-*°
•V7?
-7 /,
.57
y
y
.8210
7V
7
7
1*0
67
-7V
Y.O
Jo
7/3
70
-S'-'S"
i.o
73
feS"
,•790
•lift
73
739
17
/Y
/i
-733
77S"
77
735
-710
89
-------
If-I.
SAMPLE DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project
Test Team K 7 #
Sample Data .^i^iA
C £?, Test NO. *V
1 ' ' HO. J
Point
No.
RAG
Filter
No.
Sample
Time
Min.
Start
Time
Pitot
in.
Probe
in.H20
Vacuum
in. Hg
Meter
ft3
Meter
Temp. °F
Left Right
Stack
Temp.
S. Gel
Temp.
°F
Probe
Temp.
F
Comment
/^^
3W.03
3^.^/
707
,3*0
3,5
Z2Z
.$10
735
75?
7
737
, W
7^5
757
T
-7
/
,5
75T
JO
/J
XV
75-
75"
Ml
fc/7
,77
f.03
Y/?. ^7
73
/7
.-75-
no
?. 60
1 ^
731
90
-------
.••,V:". •'••.->•;, ".'•'.. PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET ., '.';..
•'/*•**•*.**"'".•.. • • •• * '
Date: / >yY6/4 7; : '' ;' Plant: Sic/or/ of C/}. ''£')
Run number: ^ '' • Location of sample port: c5 V/?c
Operator: -^,T, /^^ ftM Barometric pressure: & O, 3&
Sample box number: & ' Ambient temperature: JT 7
Ircpinger H20
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled with
Volume collected 3 ^o ml
Container No.. / 7/'
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~-of impinger water ,[
'
Impinger water residue ,2
jjmpingers and back half of
filter, acetone v/ash:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results tO /AS"'?
mg
r
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Contaj-ner No..
Extra No.
V/eight results
_mg
.Probe, cyclone, flask, and
;' front half of filter,
acetone v/ash:
Container No./7c) .
Extra Ho. V/eight results '••/3Q& mg
:•: Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
Total particulate weight
Filter particulate
weight ,
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: (oil
'• Weight before test: '37 b"
Moisture v/eight collected: /6
Container number: 1. 2,
Moisture total
gm
Sample number:
Method determination:.
Comments:
Analyze for:
91
-------
PRELIMINARY DATA
EMISSION TEST
Project
Test Team
_Sample Date /
Test No.
E. Qrsat Data
1. Field Run: CO
2. Lab Run: CO
j C02
-GO,
jj3.u IMUI; \su i e~^_ j "^v, ~
(lab calculations using bulbs)
F. Stack Pressure
Measuring instrument
Inches HgO
(See Test )
G. Probe Tip Diameter
Inches .
H. Define Sample Train
1. Impingers
Normal
2. Probe length
3. Special:
Initial
Final
Difference
No. 1
(tip) No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
150 ml.
150 ml.
Dry
Silica Gel
/rO
/ o O
&
/r?5"
3. 6"o-
Z.G~3~
1-4-
L- II
.2 ?2s
/ C 2-
34
ft,.
92
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
Plant
Bar. Pressure
Ambient Temp.
Run Ho.
Power Stat Setting
O O
Location
"Hg Stack Temp2rature
IF Stack Dimensions
Filter Used: Yes NO
Operator
CLDCK
TIME
33
METER (Ft.3)
NCAP-36 (l?/67)
FLOW METER
SETTING (CFH)
Irnpingors v/ith
Jmpingars v/ith
METER TEHPERATURL
IN
ml of
ml of
Total number of Ircpingers
SampTe Bottle No. // —
Irnpinger Bucket No.
Meter Box Mo.
. 93
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sampled for
Date
Plant
Location
Bar. Pressure
Ambient Tcrnp.
Run No.
"Hq Stack Temp2rature_
°F Stack Dimensions
Power Stat Setting
Filter Used: Yes Nd
Operato
CLOCK
TIME
IS&z
5&
!*>&*
oft
/J
IB
Ff\3
METER (Ft.3)
S/.OO?.
073
}J£G>
^^
97. ?
4o&
4/£.
.. ^~y— .j,^ .
FLOW METER
SETTlliG (CPU)
METER TEMPERATURE
IN
.55-
S^
57
57
•5^.
t-5-^
^-^
'' " :/"r: Implngai-s with / S _ ml of
'if'.. ^.^^ ...
Itnplhgsrs v;Uh__
("D
o
NCAP-36 (12/67)
7
Total mntibsr of Impingers
Sample Bottle Ho. l_
Impinger Bucket No. LJ/ ,*3 3/3
Heter Dox No.
94
"
-------
OXIDES OF NITROGEN FIELD DATA
Date _
Plant
] I
Sample Collected By _
Run No:: —"^ 4
Power Stat Setting
Field Data
Clock time
174
Flask number
Volume of flask less
correction (liter)
Pressure before sampling
in Hg.
27. £
L.6
Ho
Pressure after sampling
1n Hg.
/V/7
lask temperature, °F
I,
Remarks:
a
NCAP-35 (12/67)
95
-------
GAS SAMPLING FIELD DATA
Material Sealed for CO C@9
Date
Plant
/??/
/\
METER (Ft.3)
t?o <24^9
a?
METER TEMPERATURE
IN
7C°f^
74t>°f
<72>°f
72 *f
Jrnpingcrs with
Impingars v/ith
ml of
ml of
Total number of Imprngers
Sample Bottle No.
Impincjer Bucket No.
Mater Dox No.
NCAP-36 (121/67)
96
-------
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Time
Operator
Prf
Comments;
Test
(co2)
Reading 1
/O.b
a 7
(02)
Reading 2
/7.1-
1*1,1-
- 13- >'
(CO)
Reading 3
I 'I. 2-
97
NCyVP-31 (12/07)
-------
APPENDIX E
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDUEES
The sampling procedures are those specified in the attached
Federal Register of 17 August 1971.
98
-------
rTA
ATK ISOUR.
I
I.' Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. A sampling site and the
number of traverse points arc selected to
aid in the extraction of a representative
sample.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
Ke-w Source Performance Standards. Tnls
method Is not Intended to apply to gas
streams other than those emitted directly to
the atmosphere without further processing.
2. Procedure.
2.1 Selection of & sampling site and mini-
mum number of traverse points.
2.1.1 Select a sampling site that is at
least eight stack or duct diameters down-
stream and two diameters upstream from
any flow disturbance such as a bend, expan-
sion. contraction, or visible flame. For a
rectangular cross section, determine an
equivalent diameter from the following
- equation:
\
I
equivalent diameter
J
equation 1-1
2.1.2 When the above sampling site cri-
teria can be met, the minimum number of
traverse points Is twelve (13),
3.1 A Some sampling dfraatlona render th»
above sampling site criteria Impractical.
When this Is the case, choose a convenient
sampling location and use Figure 1-1- to
determine the minimum, number of traverse
points.
2.1.4 To use Figure 1-1 first measure the
distance from, the chosen sampling location
to the nearest' upstream and downstream
disturbances. Determine the corresponding
number of traverse points for each distance
from Figure 1-1. Select the higher of the two
numbers of traverse points, or a greater value,
such, that for circular stacks the number Is
a multiple of four, and for rectangular stacks
the number follows the criteria of section
2.2.2.
2.2 Cross sectional layout and location ol
traverse points.
3.2.1 For circular stacks locate the traverse
points oa two perpendicular diameters ac- '
cording to Figure 1-2 end Taole 1-1.
NUMBER Of DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM'
(DISTANCE A)
CO
CD
f>
o
a.
O
K.
z
s
Z
s
FROM POINT OF ANY TYPS OF
DISTURBANCE IBEND. EXPANSION. CONTRACTION. ETC.)
Figure 1-2. Cross section of circular stack showing location of
traverse points on perpendicular diameters.
o
o
-— — -
o
.
1
1
o 1 o
1
1 _ _
r i
•
0 ! O
!
I
01 0
1
!
o
o
. o
JO
O
m
O
C
rn
o ,
Figure 1-3. Cross section of rectangular stack divided Into 12 equal
'areas, with traverse points at centroid of each area.
NUMBER OF DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM*
{DISTANCE B)
F gun> 1-1. Minimum nurnbar of tnwersa points.
-------
Table 1-1. Location of traverse points in circular stacks
(Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverso point)
Traversa
point
number
on a
diameter
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 •'
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Number of
6 8
4.4 ' 3.
14.7 10
29.5 19.
~70:«f\32.
3
5
4
3
10
2.5
8.2
14.6
22.6
12-
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
85.3 67.7\34.2 25.0
95.6 80.6 6~5T\35.5
89.
5
96.7
-
77.4
85.4
91.8
97.5
64.5^
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
traverse
points
14 ' f 16
1
5
9
14
20
26
\36
73
79
85
90
94
•98
.8
.7
.9
.6
.1
.9
.6
,1.6
4.9
8.5
12.5
16.9
22.0
28.3
on a
18
1.4
4.4
7.5
10.9
14.6
18.8
23.6
diameter
20
1.3
3.9
6.7
9.7
12.9 '
. 16.5
20.4
^4\3Z.5 29.6 25.0
.1 62.5 V38.2. 3Q.6
.9 71.7 61.8\38.]p
.4
.1
.3
.2
78.0
83.1
87.5
91.5
95.1
98.4
' ' -
70.4
76.4
81.2
85.4
89.1
92.5
S5.6
93.6
22
1.1
3.5
6.0
8.7
11.6
14.6
18.0 '
21.8
26.1
31.5
(61.2 \39.3
69.4
75.0
79.6
83.5
87.1
90.3
93.3
96.1
98.7
68.5
73.9
78.2
82.0
85.4
88.4
91.3
94.0
96.5
98.9
• •.
' 24
1.1
3.2
5.5 •
7.9
10.5
13.2
16.1
19.4
23.0
27.2
32.3
\39.8
60.2
67.7 '
72.8 '.
77.0 ' .
80.6 ;
83.9 . j
86.8 :
89.5 V
92.1
94.5 ;
96.8
98.9
2.2.2. For rectangular stacks divide the
cross section into as many equal rectangular
areas as traverse points, such that the ratio
of the length to the width of the elemental
area* Is between one and two. Locate the tra-
verse points at the centrold of each equal
area according to Figure 1-3.
3. References. Determining Dust Concen-
tration In a Gas Stream. ASME Performance
Test Code £27. New York. 1S57.
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con- '
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co. Los Angeles. Bulletin WP-50.
19 £8.
• Standard Method for'Sampling Stacks for
Partlculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
Standards, Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
^METHOD " a—DETEHMINATION ".• or",' STACK
"^VELOCITY <
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15711
4.2 Calculate the pilot tube coefficient
ualog Equation 2-1.
Cp,..,= Cp..d-^r-'Jli
"" Y APU<» equation 2-1
where:
Cf,..,=Pilot tube coefficient of Type S
pilot lube.
C».u=Pltot lube coefficient of standard
typo pilot tube (If unknown, use
' ' 0.99).
y . AP,M=Veloclly head measured by rrtand-
" < ard lype pilot lube.
AP,,,,=Veloclly bead measured by Type S
• pilot tube.
43 Compare the coefficients of the Type S
pilot tube determined first with one leg and
then the other pointed downstream. Use the
pilot lube only IT Ihe Iwo cocfflclcnto differ
by no more than 0.01.
6. Calculations.
Use Equallon 2-2 lo calculate the stack gas
veloclly.
V.-K.C.VS
1 i »M»
equation 2-2
where:
V.
Slack gas velocity, feet per second (f.p.s.).
lb. V" "hen these units
"' (
«co. Vj
are used.
»"'
= Pilot tuba coefficient, dlmcnslonless.
'Absolute stack Ras temperature, "H.
•Velocity head of stack pas, In 11 iO (sec fig. 2-2).
^Absolute stack pas pressure, In llg.
= Molecular weight oi slack gas, Ib./lb.-molo.
PLAMT
DATE__
BUN NO.
STACK DIAMETER. ln._
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. !n. Hg._
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK (Pg). In. Hg._
OPERATORS '
SCHEMATIC OF STACK
CROSS SECTION
Traverse point
number
Velocity head,
in. H20
AVERAGE:
Stack Temperature
Figure 2-2 shows ft sample recording sheet
for velocity traverse clnta. Use Ihe averages In
the lasl Iwo columns of Figure 2-2 lo deter-
mine tho average stack gas veloclly from
Equation 2-2.
6. References.
Mark, L. 8. Mechanical Engineers' Hand-
book. McGraw-Hill Book Co.. Inc., New York.
1951. .
Perry, J. H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1960.
Shlgehara, R. T., W. P. Todd, and W. S.
Smith. Significance of Errors In Stack Sam-
pling Measurements. Paper presented at the
Annual Meellng of Ihe Air Pollution Control
Association. St. Louis, Mo., June 14-19. 1970.
Standard Melhod for Sampling Slacks for
Partlculalc Mailer. In: 1871 Book of ASTM
•tandards, Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
. Vennard, J. K. Elementary Fluid Mechanics.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1947.
AMZTH'
OD s— CAS 'XWAI.YS1S roti"ctii£S5
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1. Principle. An Integrated or grab gas
sample Is extracted, from a sampling point
and: analyzed for its components using an
Orsat analyzer.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Grab sample (Figure 3-1). .
2.1.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex1
glass, equipped with a filter lo remove par-
tlculalo mailer.
2.1.2 Pump—One-way squeeze bulb, or
- equivalent, to transport gas sample to ana-
lyzer. '
2.2 Integrated sample (Figure 3-2).
2.2.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex *
glass equipped with a filler lo remove par-
tlculate mailer.
- 2.2.2 Air-cooled condenser—To remove.
any excess moisture.
2.2.3 Needle valve—To adjust flow rate.
2.2.4 Pump—Leak-free, diaphragm type,
or equivalent, to pull gas.
2.2.5 Bate meter—To measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.035 c.f Jn. .
2.2.6 Flexible bag—Tedlar,1 or equivalent,
with a capacity of 2 to 3 cu. ft. Leak test the
bag In the laboratory before using.
2.2.7 Pilot tube—Type S, or equlvalenl,
. attached to the probe so thai Ihe sampling
' ~\ flow rale can be regujaled proportional lo Ihe
stack gas veloclly when vclocily Is varying
' vrtlh lime or a sample Iraverse Is conducted.
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 Orsat analyzer, or equivalent.
3. Procedure.
.—3rl—Grab-sampling.
_..3.1.1— Set up Ihe cqulpmonl as shown in
Figure 3-1. Place Ihe probe In the stack al a
sampling point and purge the sampling line.
Figure 2-2. Velocity traverse dala.
1 Trade name.
Ko. 160—Pt. II 2
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
101
-------
15712
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
PROBE.
FLEXIBLE TUBING
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
SQUEEZE BULB
Figure 3-1. Grab-sampling train.
RATE METER
VALVE
AIR-COOLED CONDENSER
PROBE
QUICK DISCONNECT
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
Figure 3-2. Integrated gas - sampling train.
3.1.2 Draw sample Into the analyzer.
3.2 Integrated sampling.
3.3.1 Evacuate the flexible bag. Set up the
equipment as shown In Figure 3-2 with the
bag disconnected. Place the probe In the
stack and purge the sampling line. Connect
the bag, making sure that all connections
&re tight and that there are no leaks.
3.2.2 Sample at a rate proportional to the
stack gas velocity.
• 3.3 Analysis.
3.3.1 Determine the CO:, 02, and CO con-
centrations as soon as possible. Make as many
passes as are necessary to give constant read-
Ings. If more than 10 passes are necessary,
replace the absorbing solution.
'3.3.2 Por Integrated sampling, repeat the
analysis until three consecutive runs vary
no more than 0.2 percent by volume for each
component being analyzed.
• 4. Calculation*.
4.1 Carbon dioxide. Average the three
consecutive runs and report result to the
nearest 0.1 percent COs.
4.2 Excess air. Use Equation 3-1 to cal-
culate excess air, and average the runs. Re-
port the result to the nearest 0.1 percent
excess air.
volume, dry
volume, dry
0.204(% N,)-(% 0,)+0.5(% CO)X10°
equation 3-1
where:
%EA=Percent excess air. .
%O, = Percent oxygen by
basis.
%N,=Percent nitrogen by
basis.
% CO=Percent carbon monoxide by vol-
ume, dry basis.
0.264 = Ratio of oxygen to nitrogen In air
by volume.
4.3 Dry molecular weight. Use Equation
3-2 to calculate dry molecular weight and
average the runs. Report the result to the
nearest tenth.
Md=0.44(% CO,) +0.32(% O.)
•f0.28(%N,+ % CO)
Equation 3-3
where: >
Md = Dry molecular weight. lb./lb.-
mole.
%CO,='Percent carbon dioxide by volume,
dry basis.
%O,=Percent oxygen by volume, dry
basis.
%N, = Percent nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
0.44=Molecular weight of carbon dioxide
divided by 100.
0.32 = Molecular - weight of oxygen
divided by 100.
0.28 = Molecular weight of nitrogen
divided by 100.
5.
TO ANALYZER Altshullcr, A. P., et al. Storage of Oasea
and Vapors In Plastic I3ags. Int. J. Air tc
Water Pollution. 6:75-81.1063.
Conner, William D., and J. S. Nader. Air
Sampling with Plastic Bags. Journal of the
American Industrial Hygiene Association.
25:291-207. May-June 1064.
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
• Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Moisture Is removed from
the gas stream, condensed, and determined
gravlmetrically.
' 13 Applicability. This method Is appli-
cable for the determination of moisture In
.stack gas only when specified by test proce-
durea-for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards. This method
does not apply when liquid droplets are pres-
ent In the gas stream.'
Other methods such as drying tubes, wet
bulb-dry bulb techniques, and volumetric
condensation techniques may be used sub-
ject to the approval of the Administrator.
. 2. Apparatus.
2.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex1 glass
sufficiently heated to prevent condensation
and equipped with a filter to remove par-
ticulate matter.
2.2 Implngers—Two midget Implngers,
each with 30 ml. capacity, or equivalent.
2.3 Ice bath container—To condense
moisture In Implngers.
2.4 Silica gel tube—To protect pump and
dry gas meter.
2.5 Needle valve—To regulate gas flow
rate.
2.6 Pump—Leak-free, diaphragm type, or
equivalent, to pull gas through train.
. 3.7 Dry gas meter—To measure to within
1 percent of the total sample volume.
. 2.8 Rotameter—To measure a flow range
• from 0 to 0.1 c.f.m.
2.9 Balance—Capable of measuring to the
nearest 0.1 g.
2.10 Barometer—Sufficient to read to
within 0.1 In. Hg.
2.11 -Pilot tube—Type S, or equivalent, at-
tached to probe so that the sampling flow
rate can be regulated proportional to the
stack gas velocity when velocity Is varying
with time or a sample traverse Is conducted.
. 3. Procedure.
3.1 Place about 5 ml. distilled water In
each Impinger and weigh the Implnger and
contents to the nearest 0.1 g. Assemble the
apparatus without the probe as shown In Fig-
ure 4-1. Leak check by plugging the Inlet to
the first Implnger and drawing a vacuum. In-
sure that flow through the dry gas meter Is
less than 1 percent of the sampling rate.
3.2 Connect the probe, and sample at a
constant rate of 0.075 c.f.m. or at a rate pro-
portional to the stack gas velocity not to ex-
ceed 0.075 c.f.m. Continue sampling until the
dry gas meter registers 1 cu. ft. or until visible
liquid droplets are carried over from the first
Implnger to the second. Record temperature,
pressure, and dry gas meter reading as re-
quired by Figure 4-2.
3.3 After collecting the sample, weigh the
Implngers and their contents again to the
nearest 0.1 g.
i Trade name.
s If liquid droplets are present In the gas
stream, assume the stream to be saturated,
determine the average stack gas temperature
(Method 1), and use a psychromctrlc chart
to obtain an approximation of the moisture
percentage.
V
FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY. AUGUST 17, 1971
- 102
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15713
4. Calculations.
4.1 Volume ol watwcollcctcd.
equation 4.-1
where:
Vw.=Volume of nter vapor collected
(standard cindltlons). cu. ft.
Wi=Flnal weight of Implngers md
contents, g.
Wi=Initial weight of Implngers and
contents, g.
'R=ldeal gas constant, 21.83-ln. Hg—
cu. ft./lb. mole-* n.
T.,,=Absolutc temperature at standard
conditions, 630* R.
P.M=Pressure at standard conditions,
28.92 In. Hg.
M»=Molecular weight of water, 18
Ib./lb. mole.
4.9 Ooa volume.
SILICA GEL TUBE
HEATED PROBE
VALVE
FILTER '{GLASS WOOL)
ICE BATH
7
"*»,*• I c jf u=:i u.,
It3
•
ROTAMETER SETTING,
ItVmin
•
— .
METER TEMPERATURE.
°F
-
-
in. Hg/ T«, equation 4-2
where
, Vi«.
V
f
P,u
T
=:Dry gas volume through meter at
standard conditions, cu. ft.
=:Dry gas volume measured by meter.
cu. ft.
= Barometric pressure at the dry gas
meter, in. Hg.
=Pressure at standard conditions,
29.92-ln. Hg.
=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions. 530" R.
= Absolute temperature at meter
(•F.+460).'R.
4.3 Moisture content.
B.
V..
"V«+V..
-+(0.025)
: • . • equation 4-3
where:
Bw« = Proportion by volume of water
vapor In the gas stream, dlmen-
Blonless.
V»e=Volume of water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
Vo.«=Dry gas volume through meter
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
Bw«i=Approxlmate volumetric proportion
.of water vapor In the gas stream
. leaving the Implngers, 0.025.
6. References.
Air Pollution Engineering Manual.
Danlelson, J. A. (ed.). U.S. DHEW, PHS,
National Center for Air Pollution Control.
Cincinnati, Ohio. PHS Publication No.
899-Ap-40. 1967.
De vox kin. Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Lor Angeles. Calif. November
1963. '
. Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co., Los Angeles, Calif. Bulletin
WP-50. 1968.
Figure 4-Z. Field motsturo determination,
1. Principle and applicability.
.1.1 Principle. Partlculate matter Is with-
drawn Isoklnetlcally from the source and its
weight Is determined gravlmetrictilly after
removal of uncomblned water.
1.2 Applicability. This method Is applica-
ble for the determination of partlculate
emissions from stationary sources only when
specified by the test procedures for deter-
mining compliance with New Source Per-
formance Standards. , .
•" 2. Apparatus.
.. 2.1 Sampling train. The design speclfica-
• tlons of the partlculate sampling train used
by EPA (Figure 5-1) are described In APTD-
0581. Commercial models of this train are
BvaJlable.
2.1.1 Nozzle—Stainless steel (316) with
sharp, tapered leading edge.
2.1.3 Probe—Pyrcx ' glass with a heating
system capable of maintaining a gas tempera-
ture of 250' P. at the exit end during
sampling. When temperature or length
.limitations are- encountered, 31C stainless
etcel, or equivalent, may be vised, as approved
by the Administrator.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
103
-------
15711
3.1.3 Pilot tube—Type S. or equivalent.
attached to 'probe to monitor stock gas
Telocity. ' •>'
3.1.4 Filter holder—Pyrcx' glass wllh
beating system capable of maintaining any
temperature to a maximum of 225* P.
2.1.6 Implngcrs—Pour Implngcrs con-
nected In scries with glass ball Joint fittings.
The first, third, and fourth Implncers ore of
the Oreenburg-Smlth design, modllled by re-
' PROPOSED RULE MAKING
placing the tip with a '/j-lnch JD glass tube
extending to %-lnch from the bottom of the
flask. The second Implngcr Is of the Green-
burg-Smlth design with the standard Up.
2.1.8 Metering system—Vacuum gauge.
leak-free pump, thermometers capable of
measuring temperature to within 6* P., dry
gas meter with 3 percent accuracy, and re-
lated equipment, or equivalent, as required
to maintain an Isoklnetlc sampling rate and
to determine sample volume.
PROBE
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
HEATED AREA FILTER HOLDER THERMOMETER CHECK
\ / / ^VALVE
' "
PITOT MANOMETER
ORIFICE
VACUUM
LINE
VACUUM
\ GAUGE
MAIN VALVE
DRY TEST METER
AIR-TIGHT
. PUMP.
Figure 5-1.
3.1.7 Barometer—To measure atmospheric
pressure to ±0.1 In. Hg.
32 Sample recovery.
32.1 Probe brush—At least as long as
probe.
3.22 Gloss wash bottles—Two.
22 J Glass sample storage containers.
2.2.4 Graduated cylinder—250 ml.
• 2.3 Analysis.
•2.3.1 Glass weighing dishes.
2.32 Desiccator.
• 2.3.3 Analytical balance—To measure
±0.1 mg.
2.3.4 Beakers—250 ml. ;
•Trade name.
Paniculate-sampling train. • •
^83:5~'Separatory funnels-^SOO ml/ and
1,000 mis' ~
^y.y.f Trip balance—300 g. capacity, to
measure to ±0.05 g.
2.3.7 Graduated cylinder—25 ml.
3. Reagents..
3.1 Sampling
3.1.1 Filters—Glass fiber, MSA 1106 BH,
or equivalent, numbered for identification
and prewelghed.
3.12 Silica gel—Indicating type, 8 to 10
mesh, dried at 175' C. (350' P.) for 2 hours.
3.1.3 Water—Delonlzed, distilled.
3.1.4 Crushed Ice.
3.3 Sample recovery
3.2.1 Water—Delonlzed, distilled.
to
3:2.2 Acetone—Reagent grade.
3.3 Analysis
3.3.1 Water—Delonlzed. distilled.
3.3.2 Chloroform—Reagent grade.
3.3.3 Ethyl ether—Reagent grade.
3.3.4 Dcdccant—Drlerlte.» Indicating.
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 After selecting the sampling site and
the minimum number of sampling points,
determine the stack, pressure, temperature,
moisture, and range of velocity head.
4.1.2 Preparation of collection train.
Weigh to the nearest gram approximately
200 g. of silica gel. Label a filter of proper
diameter, desiccate' for at least 24 hours
and weigh to the nearest 0.5 mg. in a room
. where the relative humidity is less than
50 percent. Place 100 ml. of water In each of
the first two Implngers, leave the third 1m-
plnger empty, and place approximately 200
g. of prewelghed silica gel in the fourth 1m-
plnger. Save a portion of the water for use
as a blank in the sample analysis. Set up the
train without the probe as in Figure 5-1.
Leak check the sampling train at the sam-
pling site by plugging the Inlet to the filter
bolder and pulling a 15-ln. Hg vacuum. A .
leakage rate not in excess of 0.02 c.f.m. at a
vacuum of 15-ln. Hg is acceptable. Attach
the probe and adjust the heater to provide a
gas temperature of about 250* F. at the
probe outlet. Turn on the filter heating sys-
tem. Place crushed Ice around the Implngers.
-Add more Ice during the run to keep the tem-
perature of the gases leaving the .last im-
plnger at 70* F. or less.
4.1.3 Participate train operation. For each
run record the data required on the example
sheet shown in Figure 5-2. Take readings
at each sampling point at least every 5 min-
utes and when significant changes in stack
conditions necessitate additional adjust-
ments in flow rate. To begin sampling, po-
sition the nozzle at the first traverse point
with the tip pointing directly Into the gas
stream. Immediately start the pump and ad-
just the flow to isokinetlc conditions. Main-
tain Isoldnetlc sampling throughout the
sampling period. Nomographs ore available
which aid in the rapid adjustment ot the
sampling rate without other computations.
APTD-057C details the procedure for using
these nomographs. Turn off the pump at the
conclusion of each run and record the firuvl
readings. Remove the probe and nozzle from
the stack and handle In accordance with the
sample recovery process described .In section
4.2.
•Dry using Drlerlte1 at 70'±10' F.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36. NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
: 104 '. .
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15715
KANT
LOCATION
OPERATOR
PATE
RUN NO.
SAMPLE BOX NOL_
METER BOX N0._
METER A »Q
CFACTOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE.
ASSUMED MOISTURE. S_
HEATER BOX SETTING
PROBE LENGTH, in..
NOZZLE DIAMETER, in. _
PROBE HEATER SETTING.
SCHEMATIC OF STACK CROSS SECTION
TRAVERSE POINT
NUMBER
•
_
TOTAL
SAMPLING
TIME
(o), mirt.
AVERAGE
STATIC
PRESSURE
1PS). in. Hg.
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Tsl.'F
,
"*
VELOCITY
HEAD
I A PS).
-
-.
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
ACROSS
ORIFICE
METER
(AH).
in. H2O
~
GAS SAMPLE
VOLUME
IVm), ft3
GAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
1 AT DRY GAS METER
INLET
«Tm ,n;>.'F
Avg.
OUTLET
(Tmoull.-F
Avg.
Avg.
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE,
°F
-
iMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
"F
4.2 Sample recovery. Exercise care In mov-
ing the collection train from the test site to
the sample recovery area to minimize the loss
of collected sample or the gain of extraneous
paniculate matter. Set aside portions of the
water and acetone xised In the sample recov-
ery as blanks for analysis. Place the samples
in containers as follows:
. Container No.H^nemove theCftlterJfom Its
holder, place In This container, and seal.
Container No. (2y Place loose partlculate
matter and acetone, washings -from all sam-
ple-exposed Surfaces prior to the filter In this
container and seal. Use a razor blade, brush,
or rubber policeman to loosen adhering par-
ticles.
Container No. (SJMeasure the volume of
jffltcrr. from the first three Implngers and
place the water In this container. Place water
'. • * ' Figure 5-2. Particular Held dala. . ' ! • .
\ x-
jjnslngs of all sample-exposed surfaces^be- slcate, and dry to a constant weight. Report
tween thejjlter and fourth Implnger In this results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
container prior to sealing" " Container No. 2. Transfer the acetone
Container NojQ^ Transfer the <|ilica eQ/ washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
from -the fourth implnger to the "original
container and seal. Use a rubber policeman
as an aid In removing silica gel from the
Implnger. ,
Container No/S^Thoroughly rinse all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces between the niter and
fourth Impinger with ^acetone, place the
washings in this container." and seal.
4.3 Analysis. Record the data required on
the example sheet shown In Figure 5-3.
Handle each sample container as follows:
Container No. 1. Transfer the niter and any
loose partlculate matter from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish, des-
dryness at ambient temperature and pres-
sure. Desslcate and dry to a constant weight.
Report results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 3. Extract organic partlculate
from the Implnger solution with three 25 ml.
portions of chloroform. Complete the ex-
traction withTthree 25~~ml. portions of ethyl
ether. Combine the ether and chloroform ex-
tracts, transfer to a tared beaker and evapo-
rate at 70* P. until no solvent remains. Des-
slcate, dry to a constant weight, and report
the results to the nearest 0.5 mg. • -s
Container No. 4. Weigh the spent silica
gel and report to the nearest gram.
FEDERAL REGISTEH, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1771
105
-------
1571G
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
• i
PLANT__
DATE
RUN N0._
.-CONTAINER
• NUMBER
1
2
"3a»
3b'»
.5
TOTAL
WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE COLLECTED,
W8- . •
FINAL WEIGHT
.Z^xCl
TARE WEIGHT
• • -
.ZxC
WEIGHT GAIN
'
where: ' • '
V«.,4=Voluraa of. gas sample through, the
dry gas meter (standard condl-
. _• . tlons), cu. ft.
. -Vm=Volume of gas sample through the
dry gas meter (meter conditions),
' eu> ft.
-' T(U=Absolute temperature at standard-
s ' conditions. 530 *R. -
T»^= Average dry gas meter temperature,
•R- .
PM,=Barometrlc pressure at the -orifice
meter. In. Hg.
AH=Piessure drop across the orifice'
meter, in HjO.
13.6=Speclflc gravity of mercury.
Pltd:=Absolute pressure at standard con-
. ditlons. 29.92 In. Hg.
6.1.3 Volume of Water vapor.
1.0474,
cu.
•3a • ORGANIC EXTRACT FRACTION.
•*3b • RESIDUAL WATER FRACTION.
'• ' • *
V
, • FINAL
. • . INITIAL
LIQUID COLLECTED
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
VOLUME OF LIQUID
WATER COLLECTED
! 1MPINGER
VOLUME,
ml
. SILICA GEL
WEIGHT.
9
•
8* : ml
•CONVERT WEIGHT OF WATER TO VOLUME BY DIVIDING TOTAL WEIGHT
INCREASE BY DENSITY OF WATER. \\ g/ml):
INCREASE, g _
' M . ,. ss VOLUME WATER, ml
-•.-•- \\ 8/miJ . .
ml.
equation 5-2
.
"where:
1 _VB,,O =Denslty of water. 1 g./ml. •
. MH,O= Molecular weight of water. 18 Ib./lb.
1 . • • . mole.
R=Ideal gas constant, 21.83 In Hg.-cu.
ft./lb. mole-°R;
. . T,u=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
P ld=Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions. 29.92 In. Hg.
. 6.1.4 Total gas volume. ' -
• .
....... . equation 5-3
where: .. '•..•'."
Vuul=Totel volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions) , cu. ft.
, V«.,4=Volume of gas through dry gas
. meter (standard conditions), cu.
.'• " n. • ' . .
Vrftt= Volume of water vapor In the gas
• . sample (standard conditions) , cu.
. ' • It. '
6.1.5 Total partlculate weight. Determine
ythe total participate catch from the sum of
the weights on the analysis data sheet (Fig-
ure 6-3).
• 6.1.6 Concentration. • ^
Figure 5-3. Analytical data.
Container No. 6. Transfer the acetone
washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pres-
sure. Desiccate, dry to a constant weight, and
report the results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
6. Calibration.
Use standard methods and equipment ap-
proved by the Administrator to calibrate
the orlflco meter, pilot tube, dry gas meter,
and probe heater. -
6. Calculation}.
6.1 Sample concentration method.
6.1.1 Average dry gas meter temperature.
See data sheet (Figure 5-2).
6.1.2 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample
volume measured by the dry gas meter to
standard conditions (70' P., 29.92 In. Hg) by
using Equation 6-1.
P.,d
equation 5-1
equation 5-4
where: . . -
•c'i = Concentration of participate matter
In stack gas (Sample Concentra-
tion Method) , gr./s.c.f.
M»= Total amount of partlculate mat-
ter collected, mg.
V,.,.,=Total volume of gas "sample (stand-
ard conditions) , cu. ft.
6.2 Ratio of area method.
65.1 Stack gas velocity. Collect the neces-
sary data as detailed In Method 2. Correct the
rEDERAl REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
106
-------
CT
J (
i
stack gas velocity to standard conditions
(29.92.In. Hg, 530* R.) as follows: . ,\
V-u.-V.(£-) (%*)-
'R.VLL^
equation 5-5
.where: ' .•
V.,td=Stack gas velocity at standard con-
ditions, ft./sec.
mi
in. Hg/V. T.
V.«=Stack gas velocity calculated by
Method 2, Equation 2-2, ft./sec.
P. = Absolute stack gas pressure. In. Hg.
P.,4x3Absolute pressure at standard coa-
tlons. 29.92 In. Hg.
T.td=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
T.= Absolute stack gas temperature
(average), *R.:
6.2.2 Concentration.
M, 0 Aa /0 ,_..,.._.gr.=min.W Mn \ x.• , .
"Ql"~A^~ °(2-57xl° mg.=sec.) (ev A ) e
-------
15718
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
3.3.1 Pipette*— Transfer type. 6 ml.
10 ml. sizes (0.1 ml. divisions) and 25 ml.
•tea (0.2 ml. divisions) .
3.3.3 Volumetric flasks— 60 ml., 100 ml..
and 1.000 ml.
2.3.3 Burettes — 6 ml. and 60 ml.
3.3.4 Erlenmcycr flask — 125 ml.
3. Reagents.
3.1 Sampling.
3.1.1 Water — Delonlzed. distilled.
3.1.2 Isopropnnol. 80 percent — Mix 80 ml.
of Isopropanol with 20 ml. of distilled water.
3.1.3 Hydrogen peroxide, 3 percent — dilute
100 ml. of 30 percent hydrogen peroxide with
POO ml. of distilled water. Prepare fresh dally.
S3 Sample recovery.
3.2.1 Water — Delonlzed. distilled.
3.2.2 I&opropanol, 80 percent.
3.3 Analysis.
3 J.I Water— Delonlzed. distilled.
3.3.2 Isopropanol. ' •
3.3.3 Thorln Indicator — l-(o-arsonophen-
y]azo)-2-naphthol-3, 6-dlsulfonlc acid, dl so-
dium salt (or equivalent). Dissolve 0.20 g.
In 100 ml. distilled water.
3.3.4 Barium, pcrchlorate (0.01^)— Dis-
solve 1.65 g. of barium percixlorate
|Ba(ClO4),-3H.,O] In 200 ml. distilled water
And dilute to 1 liter with Isopropanol. Stand-
ardize with eulfuric acid. '
3.3.5 Sulfurlc acid standard (0.01N)—
Purchase or standardize against a primary
•tandard to ±0.0002 N.
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling. • •
4.1.1 Preparation of collection train. Pour
1C ml. of 80 percent Isopropanol Into the
midget bubbler and 15 ml. of 3 percent hydro-
gen peroxide to each of the first two midget
Implngers. Leave the final midget Implnger
dry. Assemble the train as shown In Figure
6-1. Leak check the sampling train at the
sampling site by plugging the probe Inlet and
pulling a 10-in. Hg vacuum. A leakage rate
not In excess of 1 percent ot the sampling
rate Is acceptable. Carefully release the probe-
Inlet plug and turn off the pump. Place
crushed Ice around the Implngers. Add more
. Ice during the run to keep the temperature
of the gases leaving the last Implnger at
70' P. or less.
4.1.2 Sample collection. Adjust the sam-
ple flow rate proportional to the stack as
velocity. TXke readings at least every 6 min-
utes and when significant changes In stack
conditions necessitate additional adjust-
ments In flow rate. To begin sampling, posi-
tion the nozzle with the tip pointing directly
Into the gas stream and start the pump. Sam-
ple proportionally throughout the run. At the
conclusion' of each run, turn off the pump
end record the final readings. Remove the
probe from the stack and disconnect It from
the train. Drain the Ice bath and purge the
remaining part of the train by drawing clean
ambient air through the system for 15 min-
utes. '
4.2 Sample recovery. Disconnect the 1m-
plngcrs after the purging period. Discard
the contents of the midget bubbler. Pour
the contents of the midget Implngers into.
a polyethylene shipment bottle. Rinse the
_ three .midget Implngcrs and the connecting
tutxs with distilled water and add these
washings to the same storage container.
4.3 Sample analysis. Transfer the con-
tenta of the storage container to a 60-mL
volumetric flask. Dilute to the mark with
delonlzed, distilled water. Pipette a 10 ml.
aliquot of this solution to a 125-ml. crlen- -
myer flask. Add 40 ml. of Isopropanol and 3
to 4 drops of thorln indicator. Titrate to a
pink endpolnt using 0.01JV barium perchlo-
rate. Run a blank with each series of
samples.
6. Calibration.
6.1 Use standard methods and equipment
approved by the Administrator to calibrate
the orifice meter, pitot tube, dry gas meter,
and probe heater.
• 6.2 Standardize the suifurlc acid with po-
tassium acid phthalate as a primary stand-
ard. Standardize the barium perchlorate
with 25 ml. of standard sulfuric acid con-
taining 100 ml. of Isopropanol.
6. Calculations.
6.1 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample
volume measured by the dry gas meter to -
standard conditions (70* P.- and 29.92 in.
Hg) by using Equation 6-1.
v =v (r£n*\(?±±i\ =
v-.,a V-^T.AP.W/
0
equation 6-1
where:
V«,u= Volume of gas sample through the
dry goa meter (standard condi-
tions) , cu. ft.
Vm =V61ume of gas sample throv.gn the
dry gas meter (meter conditions) .
cu.ft.
T.,d=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530* R. • •
Tm= Average dry gas meter temperature,
•R.
'pbtr=Barometrlc pressure at the orifice
meter, In. Hg.
w=Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions, 29.92 in. Hg.
6.2 Sulfur dioxide concentration.
7.05X10
ib i \
-'-^)
g.-ml./
"".M
i . equation 6-2
where: -
cso,=Concentration of sulfur di-
• oxide at standard conditions,
dry basis, Ib./cu. ft. •
7.05xiO-'=Oonversion factor Including
the number of grams per gram
equivalent of sulfur dioxide
(32 g./g.-eq.), 453.6 g./lb., and
1,000 ml./l, Ib.-l./g.-ml.
V,=Volume of barium perchlorate
tltrant used for the sample, ml.
Vtb=Volume of barium perchlorate
tltrant used for the blank, ml.
W=Normallty of barium perchlo-
rate titrant, g.-eq./l.
VMI>=Totai solution volume of sulfur
dioxide, ml.
V.=Volume of sample aliquot
titrated, ml.
V-.u=Volumo of gas sample through
the dry gas meter (standard
conditions), see Equation 6-1.
cu. ft.
7. References.
Atmospheric Emissions from Sulfuric Acid
Manufacturing Processes. U.S. DHEW, PHS,
Division of Air Pollution. Public Health Serv-
ice Publication No. 999-AP-13. Cincinnati,
Ohio. 1965.
Corbett, P. P. The Determination of SO,
and SO, in Flue Gases. Journal of the In-
stitute of Fuel. 24:237-243. -1961.
Matty, R. E. and E. K. Dlehl. Measuring
Flue-Gas SO, and SO,. Power 107:94-97.
November 1957.
Fatten, W. P. and J. A. Brink, Jr. New
Equipment and Techniques for Sampling
Chemical Process Gases. Paper presented at
the 55th Annual Meeting of APCA. Chicago,
111. May 20-24, 1962.
METHOD 7—DETERMINATION Of. NITROGEN
OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
. 14 Principle. A. grab sample Is collected
In an evacuated flask containing a dilute
sulTurlc acid-hydrogen peroxide absorbing
solution, and the nitrogen oxides, except ni- .
. trbus oxide', are measured colorlmetrlcally
using the -phenoldlsulfonlo acid (PDS)
procedure.
1.2 Applicability. This method Is applica-
ble tor the measurement of nitrogen oxides
from stationary sources only when specified
by the test procedures for determining com-
pliance with New Source Performance
Standards. • .
3; Apparatus. '•••'.
3.1 Sampling. See Figure 7-1.
2.1.1 Probe—Pyrex1 glass, heated, with.
filter to remove partlculate matter. Heating
Is unnecessary if the probe remains dry dur-
ing the purging period.
2.1.2 Collection flask—Two litter, Pyrex1
round bottom with short neck and 24/40
standard taper opening, protected against
Implosion or breakage,
3.1.3 Flask valve—T-bore stopcock con-
nected to a 24/40 standard taper Joint.
3.1.4 Temperature gauge—Dial-type ther-
mometer, or equivalent, capable of measur-
ing 2* F. Intervals from 25* to 125* F.
2;1.5 Vacuum line—Tubing capable of
withstanding a vacuum of 3-in. Hg absolute
pressure, with "T" connection and T-bore
stopcock, or equivalent.
2.1.6- Pressure gauge—T7-tube manom-
eter, 36 inches, with 0.1 Inch divisions, or
equivalent.
2.1.7 Pump—Capable of producing a vac-
uum of 3-ln. Hg absolute pressure.
2.1.8 Squeeze bulb—One way.
' 2.2 Sample recovery.
2.2.1 Pipette or dropper.
2.2.2 Glass storage containers—Cushioned
for shipping.
1 Trade name.
KDERAl REGISTER, VOL 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
' 108
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15719
PSOCE
>SQUEEZEBULB
VALVE
FIASKVAL
HLTER
GROUND-GLASS SOCKET,
§ NO, 12/5
f
8-WAY STOPCOCK;
T-BORE, I, PYREX.
2-mmBORE, 8-mmOD
FLASK
FLASK SHIELDS .',
EVACUATE
0VENT ,
THERMOMETER
GROUND-GLASS CONE,
STANDARD TAPER,
J SLEEVE NO. 24/40
GROUND-GLASS
SOCKET. 5 NO. 12/5
PYREX
•FOAM ENCASEMENT
•BOILING FLASK •
&LITER, ROUND-BOTTOM, SHORT NECK,
WITH J SLEEVE NO. 24/40
2.2.3 Glass wash bottle.
2.3 Analysis.
2.9.1 Steam bath, !
2.3.2 Beakers or casseroles—250 ml., one
tor each sample and standard (blank).
2.3.3 Volumetric pipettes—1. 2, and 10 ml.
2.3.4 Transfer pipette—10 ml. with 0.1 ml,
divisions.
2.3.6 Volumetric flask—100 ml., one for
each sample, and 1,000 ml. for the standard
(blank).
2.8.6 Spectrophotometer—To measure ab-
•orbanoe at 420mp.
2.3.7 Graduated cylinder—100 ml. with
1.0 ml. divisions.
2.3.8 Analytical balance—To measure to
0,1 mg.
3." Reagents.
3.1 Sampling.
• 3.1.1 Absorbing solution—Add 2.8 ml of
concentrated HjSO, to 1 liter of distilled
water. Mix well and add 8 ml. of 3 percent
hydrogen peroxide. Prepare ft fresh solution
weekly and do not expose to extreme heat or
direct sunlight.
3.2 Sample recovery.
3.2.1 Sodium hydroxide (IN)—Dissolve
40 g. NaOH in distilled water and dilute to
1 liter.
3.2.2 Red litmus paper.
3.2.3 Water—Dclonlzed, distilled.
3.3 Analysts.
3.3.1 Fuming sulfurlc acid—15 to 18W by
weight free sulfur trloxlde.
3.3.2 Phenol—White solid reagent grade.
8.3.3 Sullurlc add—Concentrated reagent
grade. -
3.3.4 Standard solution—Dissolve 0 5495 g
potassium nitrate (KNO,) In distilled water
and dlluto to 1 liter. For the working stand-
ard solution, dilute 10 ml. of the resulting
solution to 100 ml. with distilled water. One
ml. of the working standard solution la
equivalent to 25 /ig. nitrogen dioxide.
Figure 7-1. Sampling train, tlask valve, and flask.
-':•'•• • ' ' . ' -
8.8.5 Water—Delonlzed, distilled.
3.3.6 Phenoldlsulfonlc acid solution—Dis-
solve 25 g. or pure white phenol In. 150 ml.
concentrated sulfurlc acid on a steam bath.
Cool, add 75 ml. fuming sulfurlc-acid, and
heat at 100" C. for 2 hours. Store In a dark,
stoppered bottle.
4. Procedure. • • ' •
4.1 Sampling. N
4.1.1 Pipette 25 ml. of absorbing solution
Into a sample flask. Insert the flask valve
stopper Into the flask with the valve In the
"purge" position. Assemble the sampling
train as shown In Figure ,7-1 and place the
probe at the sampling point. Turn the flask
valve and the pump valve to their "evacuate"
.positions. Evacuate the flask to at least 3-ln.
Hg absolute pressure. Turn the pump valve to
Its "vent" position and turn off the pump.
Check the manometer for any fluctuation In
the mercury level. If there Is a visible change
over the span of 1 minute, check for leaks.
Record the Initial volume, temperature, and
barometric pressure. Turn the flask valve to
Its "purge" position, and then do the same
with the pump valve. Purge the probe and the
vacuum tube using the squeeze bulb. If con-
densation occurs In the probe and flask valve
area, heat the probe and purge until the con-
densation disappears. Then turn the pump
valve to Its "vent" position. Turn the flask
valve to Its "sample" position and allow sam-
ple to enter the flask for about 15 seconds.
After collecting the sample, turn the flask
valve to Its "purge" position and disconnect
the flask from the sampling train. Shake the
flask for 5 minutes.
4.2 Sample recovery.
4.2.1 Let the flask sit for a minimum of
16 hours and then shake the contents for 2
minutes. Connect the flask to a mercury
filled U-tube manometer, open the valve from
the- flask to the manometer, and record the
flask pressure and temperature along with
the barometric pressure. Transfer the flask
contents to a container lor shipment or to
a 250-ml. beaker for analysis. Rinse the flask
with two portions of water (approximately
10 ml.) and add to the same amount of rinse
water as In the sample. For a blank use 25 ml.
of absorbing solution and the solution In a
container for shipment or In a 250-ml. beaker
lor analysis. Prior to shipping or analysis, add
sodium hydroxide (IN) dropwise into both
the sample and the blank until alkaline to
lltmxis paper (about 25 to 35 drops In each).
4.3 Analysis. . .
4.3.1 If the sample has been snipped In
a container, transfer the contents to a 250
ml. beaker using a small amount of water.
Evaporate the solution to dryness on a steam
bath and then cool. Add 2 ml. phenoldlsul-
fonlc acid solution to the dried residue and
triturate thoroughly with a glass rod. Make
sure the solution contacts all the residue.
Add 1'ml. water and 4 drops of concentrated
sulfurlc acid. Heat the solution on a steam
bath for 3 minutes with occasional stirring.
Cool, add 20 ml. water, mix well by stirring.
and add concentrated ammonium hydroxide
dropwise with constant stirring until alkaline
to litmus paper. Transfer the solution to a
100-ml. volumetric flask and wash the beaker
three tunes with 4- to 6-ml. portions of water.
Dilute to the mark and mix thoroughly. If
the sample contains solids, transfer a por-
tion of the solution to a clean, dry centrifuge
tube and centrifuge, or filter a portion of
the solution. Measure the absorbance of each
sample at 420 m^ using the blank solution
as a zero. Dilute the sample and the blank
with a suitable amount of distilled water
If absorbance falls outside the range of cali-
bration.
6. Calibration.
5.1 Flask volume. Assemble the flask and
flask valve and nil with water to the stop-
cock. Measure the volume of water to ±10
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159— TUESDAY, "AUGUST 17, 1971
'109
-------
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY REPORT
This section presents the report on particulate analyses which
were performed in the MRI Laboratory. The analytical data for the SOo
analyses were presented in Table B-II.
110
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO. 1
Impinger
Volume after sampling
692 ml
Impinger prefilled with_
Volume collected
200
ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water _ 225.79
492
ml
Impinger water residue 45.17 mg
Impingers and back half of filter, acetone wash: Weight results_
167.72 mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch;
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash:
Weight results_
93.53
Filter No.
51
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
1051
Filter particulate weight_
Total particulate weight
154.32 mg
664.53
_mg
Silica gel (approx. 200 g) + container
Weight after test: 615
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
590
25
Sample No.
Analyze for: Farticulate weight.
Method determination: Specified in Federal Register.
Comments: Acetone blank of 1.10 mg should be subtracted from total particulate weight.
All other blanks were zero.
Ill
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO. 2
Impinger H20:
Volume after sampling 1,020 mi
Impinger prefilled with 400 ml
Volume collected 620 ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water 112.48 mg
Impinger water residue 505.75 mg
Impingers and back half of filter, acetone wash; Weight results
9.90 mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Weight results_
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash;
Weight results
88.05 mg
Filter No.
52
53
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
1052
1053
Filter particulate weight_
Total particulate weight
124.66
638.80
mg
jng
Silica gel (approx. 200 g) + container
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
629
604
25
Sample No. 2
Analyze for: Particulate weight.
Method determination: Specified in .Federal Regisj^er_.
Comments: Acetone blank of 1.82 mg should be subtracted from total particulate weight.
All other blanks were zero.
112
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO. 3
Impinger 1^0:
Volume after sampling,
483
ml
Impinger prefilled with 200 ml
Volume collected 283 ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water 15.54 mg
Impinger water residue 24.56
mg
Impingers and back half of filter, acetone wash: Weight results_
7.72 mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Weight results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash:
Weight results_
59.62
mg
Filter No.
54
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
1054
Filter particulate weight_
Total particulate weight
49.80
157.04
_mg
_mg
Silica gel (approx. 200 g) + container
Weight after test: 619.5
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
606
13.5
Sample No. 3
Analyze for: Particulate weight.
Method determination: Specified in Federal Register.
Comments: All- other blanks were zero.
113
-------
PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
RUN NO.
Impinger t^O:
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled with
Volume collected
588
200
388
ml
ml
ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
of implnger water 90.94
Impinger water residue
288.09
mg
mg
Impingers and back half of filter,
acetone wash:
Weight results
11.58
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Weight results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and front half of
filter, acetone wash:
Weight results_
151.56
Filter No.
55
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Container No.
1055
Filter particulate weight_
Total particulate weight
97.49 mg
619.46 mg
Silica gel (approx. 200 g) + container
Weight after test: 611
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
595
16
Sample No.
Analyze for: Particulate weight.
Method determination: Specified in Fg
Comments: All'other blanks were zero.
114
-------
APPENDIX G
TEST LOG
Table G-I presents the actual time during which each sampling
vas conducted.
115
-------
TABLE G-I
SAMPLING LOG
Run
1
1
1-N1
1F-M
1F-C
2*/
2a/
2-N1
2-W2
2-N3
2-N4
2 -SI
2F-M
2F-C
3
3
3-N1
3-N2
3-N3
3-S1
3F-M
3F-C
4
4
4-N1
4-W2
4-S1
4F-C
Location
Stack (W)
Stack (N)
Stack (N)
Feed line
Feed line
Stack (W)
Stack (N)
Stack (N,)
Stack (N.)
Stack (W.)
Stack (W)
Stack (W)
Feed line
Feed line
Stack (N)
Stack (W)
Stack (W)
Stack (N)
Stack (N)
' Stack (K)
Feed line
Feed line
Stack (N)
Stack (K)
Stack (W)
Stack (W)
Stack (W)
'Feed line
Pollutant
Particulates
Particulates
NOX
Moisture
Integrated
Particulates
Particulates
WOX
NOX
WOX
wox
S02
Moisture
Integrated
Particulates
Particulates
HOX
NOX
wox
S02
Moisture
Integrated
Particulates
• Particulates
NOX
NOX
so2
Integrated
Date
12/14/71
12/14/71
12/14/71
12/14/71
12/14/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/15/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
12/16/71
Began
3
6
5
12
3
10
2
5
11
12
2
5
3
10
2
9
11
10
11
2
11
10
10
3
5
5
7
6
3
:05
:08
:50
:00
:45
:55
:58
:06
:30
:15
:55
:15
:20
:30
:45
:27
:01
:20
:10
:20
:50
:00
:00
:45
:32
:45
:25
:18
:30
P
P
P
P
P
a
P
P
a
P
P
P
P
a
P
a
a
a
a
P
a
a
a
P
P
P
P
P
P
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
Ended
4
7
12
4
12
3
6
4
2
4
10
12
1
3
11
4
6
7
4
:25
:28
:20
:55
:57
:52
:12
:20
:15
:00
.27
:01
:50
:00
:20
:45
.32
:18
:45
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
a
P
P
P
a
P
P
P
P
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m
.m.
.m.
.m.
.in.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.m.
.nil
.m,
Elapsed
Time
(min)
> 160
20
70
242
60
225
75
120
120
80
120
60
75
a/ A filter change was required during this traverse.
116
-------
APPENDIX H
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
Name
Paul Constant
Pat Shea
Ed Trompeter
Bob Conkling
Bob Stultz
Henry Maloney
Bill Shutts
Gary Kelso
Reid Flippin
Fred Bergman
Mike Hammons
Terry Howard
Chatten Cowherd
Title
Program Manager
Project Chief
Testing Engineer
(particulates)
Testing Engineer
(particulates)
Engineering Technician
(particulates)
Engineering Technician
(particulates)
Testing Engineer
(stack gases)
Testing Engineer
(feed line gases)
Field Laboratory Technician
Analytical Chemist
Laboratory Technician
Laboratory Technician
Consultant
117
------- |