SOURCE TEST REPORT
COORS PORCELAIN COMPANY
GOLDEN, COLORADO
-iron tin>titiil
. m:
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
SOURCE TEST REPORT
"7 1~
COORS PORCELAIN COMPANY
GOLDEN, COLORADO
-------
SOURCE TEST REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TEST NO: "72 - C J-O9
PLANT TESTED: Coors Porcelain Company
Golden, Colorado
TESTOR: Environmental Engineering, Inc.
2324 Southwest 34 Street
Gainesville, Florida 32601
904/372-3318
CONTRACT NO: CPA 70-82 - Task Order No. 6
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS 10
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR STATIONARY
BERYLLIUM STACK EMISSIONS 14
APPENDICES:
A. Complete Beryllium Stack Sampling Results
B. Field Data Sheets
C. Complete Sampling Procedures for Beryllium
Stack Emissions
D. Test Log and Pre-survey Information
E. Project Participants
-------
INTRODUCTION
Beryllium emission tests were performed on three sources
located at the Coors Porcelain Company in Golden, Colorado, during
February 1972. The sources tested were the calciner, the rectangular
stack in Building No. 16, and the spray dryer. The discharge stack
from the kilns in Building No. 16 was scheduled to be sampled, but
at the last moment it was abandoned because the testing time re-
quired was approximately 96 hours for the complete process.
The Coors Porcelain Company utilizes beryllium oxide in
manufacturing industrial ceramics. Emissions from all sources tested
were controlled by high efficiency particulate arrestor (HEPA) filters,
All tests were performed at sampling locations downstream from the .
filters.
Sampling time for the calciner and the rectangular stack
was about 24 hours, and for the spray dryer it was almost 8 1/2 hours.
Two sampling trains were used simultaneously at each sampling site.
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Summarized results of the beryllium emission stack tests
performed at the Coors Porcelain Company are included in Tables 1
through 7.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) performed the
sample analysis.
-------
TABLE- 1
SOURCE TEST DATA
E.P.A. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM Coors Porcelain Company
NO. OP RUNS
LOCATION OF PLAUT Golden, Colorado
TXPE OF PLANT Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium additives
CONTROL EQUIPMENT,
SAMPLING POINT
POLLUTANTS
H19h Efficiency Bag Collectors
LOCATION
SAMPLED BeryT
Calciner (Sample Box No. 2).
lium
1}RUU NO.
2}DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
&}METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20 ,
7}VOL DRY GAS Q METER CONDITIONS, ft3
^AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
3}VOL DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*t ft3
1Q}TOTAL. il^O COLLECTED, ml
11)POL WATER VAPOR § (3 S.T.P., ft3
.12}STACX GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME # .
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, %VOLUME
15)% 022
16)%- CO
18)% EXCESS AIR
1Q)MOLECULAR ';/?. OF ST^CZ GAS,DRY
2Q}MOLECULAR VT. OF STACK GAS, STACK COND.
2DSTACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, .?£T. .TO AIR
22}AVG-VV^L. u*Av ^ JiA-JZ JA3 , "H20
23}AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE.°F
24)PI TOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "!J,g ABSOLUTE
26)STACK GAS VEL Q STACK COUD., fpm
27)STACK AREA. ft2
28)S2YiCA' J/15 fLC?.V .^/IIT Q S.T.P.f scfm
OQ^/Vfrn TiT'ir* .O *r* "1"f7rn m I n
4, ;j / li Lt ± ± *. t\ i-t L/i. .* w *-• j. f 1;I ( I I t
30}SAMPLIt"v HG7.ZLE DIAMETER, in.
*?i ^ '^ /^ V T*"'*^ n 7* •*"*
^ lOu/L^;ro^^^
1
2/8,9,10/72
0700
1500
24.72
2.06
1402.150
83.5
1136.619
-174
27.49
2.4
2.0
Beryllium Concentrations; ygm/m
Beryllium emitted per 8-hour day, pis
28.99
28.73
0.99
0.727
90
0.83
24.72
2722
0.35
894
1440
0.25
109.4
I 0.025
I 238.40x10
-6
' n P v
# Based upon wet and dry bulb thermometry
-------
TABLE 2
SOURCE TEST DATA
E.P.A. TEST tlO
NAME OF FIRM Coors Porcelain Company
NO. OP RUNS.
LOCATION OF PLAUT Golden, Colorado _
TYPE OF PLA11T Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium Additives
COUTROL EQUIPMEN
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED Beryl Mum
High Efficiency Bag Collectors
Calciner (Sample Box No. 4)
DRUU no.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEG AH
H)TIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20 ,
T)VOL DRY GAS @ MUTER C011DITIOUS, ft5
•' ^AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, ° F
9)VOL- DRY GAS Q S.T.P.*t ft3
10)TOTAL 7/20 COLLECTED, ml
11)P0£ WATER VAPOR # 3 S.T.P. , ft3
.12)£2V1£/? JXS MOISTURE, 5VOLUME #
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, 5 VOLUME
i«*)5 C02
16)5 ^0
18)5 ^/fCcoS 4J^
19)MOLECULAR 'l/T . OF STACK GAS, DRY
o n \ //n r s*/^ /f r i P •' •' "^ ° r c m -i /^ x •"* 1 c c "* •' <" ;' /^o ,'j n
j Ai ^ A 0 Uai/ .
21)S!F/1C'A' GAS SP, GRAVITY, REF . TO AIR
22)AVG ~tf vzL . n^f.v ^- o^n^A u/-.o , "H20
2 3 } /I r £/ ftALriJ *J * /-. L* A Ly/-iO ±&ttp£>£*t\±URLi, £*
2u)pjrc'i'' C02REC7.IG:; FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "iig ABSOLUTE
26)Sr<4C/: u>'.5 "/Z"Z, Q STACK COND., fpm
27)5r/lC\ /I ? ^/l f *" 2
28)Sr/lCA' J/15 fiC.V t?Ml"c: Q S.T.P., scfm
2 9 );/£T rj;,'o OF rrsr., min.
3Q)SA!-IPLi;;j XGZZLE DIAMETER, in.
3 DPERCEt'lT ISGZIt'lETIC
Beryllium Concentrations; ygm/m
Beryllium emitted per 8-hour day, gms |
2
2/8,9,10/72
0700
1500
24.72
1.93
1199.439
81
976.397
.316
22.52
2.3
2.0
-
28.99
28.74
0.99
0~T A T
.741
90
0.83
24.72
2772
0.35
911
1440
0.25
92.2
0.049 '
409.95x10
.
. • •
'
*ni?Y. 70 V. '.?'i..?? i n.
#Based upon vyet and dry bulb thermometrv
-------
TABLE 3
SOURCE TEST DATA
. K.P.A. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM Coors Porcelain Company
NO. OP RUNS 1
c
LOCATION OF PLA:IT Golden, Colorado
TYPE OF PLAtlT -Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium Additives
CONTROL EQUIPMENT High Efficiency Bag Collectors • '
SAMPLING POIUT LOCATION Rectangular Stack - Building No. 16 (Sample Box No. 1) :
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED Beryllium
DRU'il UO.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEG AH
UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
DMETER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20 ,
7) VOL DR'jf GAS Q MuTER COllDITIOUS , ft*
-' IWERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
9) VOL- DRY CAS Q S.T.P.*, ftj
1Q).TOTAL ii^O COLLECTED, ml
11)VOL WATER VAPOR # . Q 5. T. P., ft5
.12)STACK GAS 'MOISTURE, £VOLUME#
1DASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
!«*)% CO 2
15)% 02
16)% CO
18)% EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULAR ',/T . OF STACK GAS , DRY
rtf*\i,/orr'/i/fr.jQ f ,• -Tt ^IT1 O (T' •! /^ X •"'IC ^TTI/^*' /^O"H
2 0 jf'lU LcC- U Lflii ;/*. iyr ox/tC-A ^/iv? * ^ j. /I w A 0 C/ai/ •
21)S21J4C* i/M5 5?. -.7/7/1 71? 7, .?£T. TO /1 1.7
22 )A VG ~V vz'L . ;:o/i^ ^^ Jirtix'/x JrtJ . , "H20
23) AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE ," F
2^)PITOT CORRECTED:- FACTOR
25)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg A2SOLUTE
26)-Sr/lCA' GAS VEL Q STACK COUD., fpm
27)Sr/lCA' /i.7Z/l , ft2
28)ST/1CA' GAS FLO'.-/ RATE Q S.T.P., scfm
29)//Er rj";..'i Or rrsr, min.
3 0 )SAMPLI ;,'G HO ZZLE DIAMETER , i n .
3DPERCEVT ISOKI'iiETIC
3
2/8,9,10/72 -
0700
1500
24.72
2.18
1305.542
76
1073.470
-202
14.22
H
2.0
-
28.99
28.85
1.0
0*\*\ r\
.338
80
0.83
24.72
1250
15.0
18168
1386
0.375
100.9
• • •
!
I
t
i
:
1
!
1
I
1
1
3
Beryllium Concentrations, ugm/m 10.586 ,
Beryllium emitted per 8-hour day, gms j 112.06x10
70
# Based upon wet and dry bulb thermometry
-------
TABLE 4
SOURCE TEST DATA
. E.P.A. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIR!-! Coors Porcelain Company
/70. 07 fl£/77S "
LOCATIO'l OF-PLAUT Golden, Colorado
TYPE OF PLAUT Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium Additives
C011TROL EQUIPMENT High Efficiency Bag Collectors
SAllPLIiJG POI'.'T LOCATION Rectangular Stack - Building No. 16 (Sample Box No. 3)
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED Beryllium
DRUtl 7/0.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEG AH
UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
6)METEIi ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "f^O
7) VOL DRY GAS Q METER COUDITIO'JS, ft*
' *) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
9)VOL- DRY CAS Q S.T.?.*, ft3
1Q)TOTAL. 1120 COLLECTED, ml
1D70L WATER VAPOR # Q S.T. P., ft3
.12)STACK GAS 'MOISTURE, ^VOLUME #
13)ASSUUED STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
14 )% CO-
IS)? 02
16U-C0
17)% 7/2
18)% EXCESS AIR
19) MOLECULAR '',/T. OF STACK GAS, DRY
20 MOLECULAR .vT. OF STACK GAS, STACK C011D .
21) STACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, REF. TO AIR
22)AVG ~V VEL. ;^>1J ^v' J^'A-JK JA3 , "H20
2 3 } A V LI R H it LI u ^. f-. UA u-.-»o i c* ,PzRii ~ (JR & , r
. 2*.)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "!J.5 ABSOLUTE
2b)STAC:< GAS VEL Q STACK COHD., fpm
2DSTACK AREA, ft2
28)S21/1CA' GAS FLO'.-/ RATE Q S.T.P., scfm
29)7/£T TIHE OF TEST, rn i n . '
^n1-r iri",r'-';-a ;n
OU/O/iiVi^/^J«u ifL/ifu«jM i^.*.n4M£>J.t_i.tt til.
*51 ^p^I/?/^>^'.'.f7l r ^ ^ >' r *' ^ ^ T .°
O A / £^£ /lUCif^ u.*^^A^.^fi^^^.^
4
2/8,9,10/72
0700
1500
24.72
2.17
1276.882
70
1064.329
-92
12.94
1.2
1.0
-
-
-
28.99
28.86
1.0
OO /I C
.346
80
0.83
24.72
1278
If A
5.0
T O P" rt *"*
18583
T O rt /*
I xHn
I \j(J\J
0*^ *7 r*
.375
97.6
_
.
Beryllium ConcentrationsS
Beryllium emitted per 8-hour day, gms
10.630
I 122.27x10
-3
*DPY. 70 °.:'. ?'j.o? in. HP:
#Based upon wet and dry bulb thermometry
-------
TABLE' 5
SOURCE TEST DATA
NO. OP RUNS.
E.P.A. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM Coors Porcelain Company _ , _
LOCATION OF PLAilT Golden. Colorado _
TYPE OF PLANT Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium Additives
CQUTROL EQUIPUEUT Hl9h fctficiency Bag Collectors
SAMPLING POI'lT LOCATION Spray Dryer (Sample Box No. 1)
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED Beryllium
!)/?{/// 110.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEG AH
UPTIME EUD
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
• DMETER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "1*2° -
1)VOL DRY GAS Q 1-luTER COUDITIOUS , ft3
^AVERAGE GAS 1-1ETER TEMPERATURE, °F
9)VOL- DRY CAS Q S.T.P.*, ftj
IQ)TOTAL. it'iO COLLECTED, ml
1DVOL WATER VAPOR # (3 S.T
.12)STACX GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME*
1DASSUUED STACK GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
1U)% C0
P., ft3
15)%
16)%
02
CO
18)% EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULA3 ''.IT. OF STACK GAS,DRY
20)MOLECULAR l.'T. OF STACK GAS, STACK COND.
(/MS
v'LL. titAu ^/ J/«^A' J~o , "H20
jr/iO;r C-AS TEMPERATURE, °F
2*)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "Ms ACSOLUTE
26)52'/»C'^ GAS VEL j STACK COtiD.-, fpm
21) STACK AREA, ft2
28)Sr/lCA J,15 fiC.V .?/ii"£r Q 5.T.P., scfm
'>Q^l"7^'r^ 'n T ' i~ r\rr "i 7" C ^» r->in
4y)Li£jJ. JLj.l-.LJ L/l ^ 4- ; ^ -. , 171 I II •
30)SAi-IPLIi;j. t'JGZZLE DIAHETER, in.
3 1 ) PERCENT ISOKI;;E TI c
3
Beryllium Concentrations > ygm/m
Beryllium emitted per 8-hour day, gms
5
2/16/72
0618
1507
24.43
3.25
616.271
77
501.682
-30
13.75
2.7 .
6.1
28.99
28.70
0.99
1.172
135
0.83
24.43
4592
0.42
1662
504
0.25
89.9
11.508 ,
I 33.91X10"13
*/J/?y. 70 °.c'. '."I.?:' in.
#Based upon wet and dry bulb thermometry
-------
TABLE 6
SOURCE TEST DATA
. E.P.A. TEST HO.
NAME OF FIRM Coors Porcelain Company
NO. OP RUNS 1
LOCATION OF PLAHT Golden, Colorado
TYPE OF PLAUT Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium Additives
CONTROL zouiPMEUT H19h Efficiency Bag Collectors
SAMPLING POIHT LOCATION Spray Dryer (Sample Box No. 4)
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED Beryllium
iW;/ no.
DDATE
3} TIME BEG AH
UPTIME EUD
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20
DVOL DRJf GAS Q UZTER COHDITIOI1S , ft3
-' B) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, " F
9)VOL- DRX CAS Q 5.T.P.*. ftj
1Q1TOTAL. U-20 COLLECTED, ml
lOVOL HATER 'VAPOR # § S.T.P. , ft3
.121STACX GAS MOISTURE* ^VOLUME #
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, % VOLUME
m)?i co2
15)^ 02
16)% CO
17 U 7/2
18)% EXCESS AIR
\§)MOLECULAR '',/T. OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR 'JT . OF STACK GAS, STACK COHD.
21) STACK GAS SP. -JZAVITZ, ZEF. .TO AIR
22)AVG ~V VZL,. :i^Au >yr J'^'A-JK GAS , "H20
23)AVERAGZ STACK C-AS TEMPERATURE ,° F
2k)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
25)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
26 )S TACK GAS VEL Q STACK COUD., fpm
27)5r/lCA' AREA, ft2
28)5T/1CA vJ/lS FLO '.-f RATE Q 5.T.P., scfm
2Q ^ // JT"7* fn T ' f ~ (0^7 "i r1 C rr r->Ir>
3 ) i< L, ± 1 *. r. u U L + *~ *J ± , lil 1 1 1 .
3Q)SAi-lPLIi\'G ,','OZZLE DIAMETER , in.
3DPERCEHT ISOKIUETIC
6
2/16/72
0618
1507
24.43
3.10
559.822
74
457.916
-38.5
12.56
2.7
6*1
.1
28.99
28.70
0.99
1.081
138
0.83
24.43
4248
0.42
1530
504
0.25
89.1
•
"
"
2
Beryllium Concentrations:; ygm/m 1 1.661
Beryllium emitted per 8-hour day, gms | 31.39x10
* 0 r> •/
c< '.") n ? • n H r»
#Based upon dry and wet bulb thermometry
-------
TABLE 7
SOURCE TEST DATA
E.P.A. TEST NO.
NAME OF FIRM Coors Porcelain Company
NO. OP RUNS 1
LOCATION OF PLANT Golden, Colorado
TIPS OF PLANT Porcelain Manufacturing with Beryllium Additives
CONTROL EQUIPMENT Hl9h Efficiency Bag Collectors
SAMPLING POINT LOCATION Rectangular - Building No. 16
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED Organic. Beryl! ium
DRUil NO.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, "H20
1)VOL DRX GAS Q MUTER CONDITIONS, ft3
' *) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, °F
9)VOL- DRX CAS Q S.T.P.*, ft3
IQWTAL. //20 COLLECTED, ml
IIWL UATER VAPOR COLL. @ S.T.P., ft3
.12)STACX GAS MOISTURE, ^VOLUME
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, %VOLUME
16)% CO
17)% ;/2
18)% EXCESS AIR
1*)MOLECULAR ',7T. OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR 1ST, OF STACK GAS, STACK COND.
21) STACK GAS SP. GRAVITY, REP. TO AIR
22)AVG-VVL'L. tiZAu Jt oT,iu'A' GAS , "H20
23)4 VSR ACS S TA CK GAS TEMPERA 'SURE , ° F
2H)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, "Hg ABSOLUTE
2$)STACK GAS VEL Q STACK COND.t fpm
2DSTACK AREA, ft'2
2B)STACK GAS FLOl-i RATE Q S.T.P., scfm
29)//£T TIMS OF TESTt.m\n.
3Q)SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER , in.
3l]PERCEilT ISOKINETIC
1
2/17/72
1120
1935
24.5
1.5
380.933
73
311.499
82
495
0.25
' .
I
'
'DRY. 70
?').9? in. Mrr
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Sampling ports and points were selected by using the
guidlines stated in Method 3 of the Federal Register (36 F.R. 23239,
December 7, 1971) concerning the Proposed EPA Regulations on National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Beryllium).
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of the Calciner that was
sampled. Figures 2 and 3 are schematics of the Building #16 Rec-
tangular Stack and the Spray Dryer, respectively.
10
-------
9'2"
6'8"
Diameter = 8 in.
Port #1
Port #2
Building
Traverse
Point
1
2
Distance from
Inner Wall
(inches)
1 11/64
6 53/64
FIGURE 1 '
SAMPLING PORT LOCATION, CALCINER STATION
11
-------
30"
A
A
Ports (6)
17'6"
Fan
r
36"
Section A - A
•« 60"
Ports (6)
5" 10" 10" 10" 10" 10"
Traverse Point
Distance from
Inner Hall (in.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2 9/16
7 23/32
12 27/32
18
23 1/8
28 1/4 •
33 13/32
FIGURE 2
LOCATION OF SAMPLING PORT, BUILDING NO. 16, RECTANGULAR STACK
12
-------
Diameter = 8.75 -in.
26"
~tl
72"
Port B
70'
Traverse
Point
1
2
Distance from
Inner Wall
(inches)
1 9/32
7 15/32
FIGURE 3
LOCATION OF SAMPLING PORT, SPRAY DRYER STATION
13
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR STATIONARY
BERYLLIUM STACK EMISSIONS
In general, the method used was Method 3 of the Federal
Register (36 F.R. 23239, December 7, 1971} concerning the Proposed
EPA Regulations on National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (Beryllium).
A complete description of the sampling method used is
in Appendix C.
The EPA performed the sample analysis.
14
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
S_Oy,RC_E SAMPLING CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COOPS PORCELAIN CO. GOLDEN COLARADO
STACK- CALCIUER
HEATHER CONDITIONS- COLD AND S1101IIUG
AS- 0.35 SQ. FEET TS- 550 DEGREES R
A2- 2.06 IK 1120 Atl- 0.000341 SO.. FEET
SAMPLE TIME- 1440 Mill OR SAT: COR-
DATE- 2/0,9,10/72
PUN 1 STARTED 7:00
PB- 24.72 111 HG PS- 24.72 in Hi
TM- 543.5 DEGREES R V/^0.727 III 1110
CP- 0.83 VI!- 1402.15 CF VC-p74 Vr,
02- CO- 112-
1)VWV = (0.0474)xKC
2)75TPD= ( ( 530)x( 7tf)x(p0+(A//*13. 6 ) ) )*( ( 29 . 92 ) x ( TM) )
3) VT = (VUV) -t- (VSTPD)
4) V = (VUV) * (VT)
5) FDA = (1.0) - (V)
6)FMOIST+ ASSUMED MOISTURES-ESTIMATED ON THE JOB
7) MD = (44xFCC>2) + (32xF02) + (2Qx(FN 2+FCO ) )
8) MS = ( (UD)x(FDA) ) + ( (18)x(f/) )
9) GS = (MS) r (28.99)
11) U - ( 174 )x ( CP)x (H ) x ( ( ( rs*29 • 92 ) * ( GS*PS ) )*0.5 )
12) QS = (U) x (AS)
13) QD = (QS) x (FDA)
14)C?STPD= (QD) x (530) T ( TS )
15) VI = (U )*(AN )*( FDA )*( 11 Mt, ;x( (.oSOj-tio) ;
1&)PISO = (100)x( VSTPD)t(VI)
17)PISOi= ( (5.626)-x(TS)x(KA/) ) T ( (U)x(TIME)*(PS)x(FDA)x
PARTICULATE LAB ANALySIS \ PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS
pg Be 1
Front Half 0.13 1
Filter 0.19 1
Back Half 0.48 1
1
Total . 0.80 1
1
1
1 _ 1
COMMENTS: _ _•
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
^ 1 n ^
) 1 U J...
11)
12)
13)
14)
-| C \
1 S> J .
16)
(AN) ) 17)
) 18)
MASS EMISSION
iEMl 9m
38.74 x 10'Ji
56.62 x 10 ~£
143.04 x 10 "°
238.40 x 10~b
27. 49
1136.611
1164.111
0. 024
0.976
0. 02
28.99
20.73
0. 99
2751.0
950
928
894
90. 4
134.5
109.4
RATES
scf
scf
scf
f,
f pm
cfm
cfm
c f m
c ,~ c
%
°/n
%
TEST CONDUCTED BY:
GEORGE ALLEN
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
§.PJJR£E SAPLING CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COORS PORCELAIN CO GOLDEN COLORADO
STACK- CALCINER
WEATHER CONDITIONS- COLD AND SHOVING
AS- 0.35 SQ, FEET TS,- 550 DEGREES R
Aft- 1.93 III 1120 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
SAMPLE Tim- 1440 HItl ORSATt C02-
DATE- .2/8 , 9 , 10/72
RUN 2 STARTED 7:00
PB- 24.72 IN HG PS- 24.72 III EG
Tit- 5'H DEGREES R -fjf 0.741 IN 1110
CP- 0.83 Vll- 1109.439 CF ^-£"316 )w»
02- CO- N2-
A#*13.6))
= ( 0 . 0 4 7 4 ) x KC1
2)VSTPD= ( (530)x(W-/
3) VT = (VWV) + (PSm?)
4) V = (VWV) * (K27)
5) FZM = (1.0) - (V)
B)FMOIST+ ASSUMED MOISTURES-ESTIMATED ON THE JOB
1) MD
8) US
9) GS = (MS) *
100x(
(2 9.9 2)x(TM)
= (
(28.99)
10)
11)
12)
13)
EA
U
QS
QD
(0.
15) PI =
16)PIS0 =
17)PIS0i=
18)PIS02=
)*0.5
(U) x (AS)
(QS) x (FDA)
(QD) x (530) v (TS)
(U)x(AN)x(FDA)x(TIME)x(
( ( 5 . 6 2 6 ) x ( TS) x ( VM ) )
(U)x(TIME)x(PS)x(FDA)*(AN) )
1).
2).
3).
4).
5).
6).
7).
8)
9)_
10).
11).
12).
13).
14).
15).
16).
17).
18).
?2.l fi 2
97P. 397
99fl. 912
0 . 0 2 .1
0.977
0.02
28. 99
28 . 74
0.99
0
2771 .9
scf
scf
scf
f prr
968
cfrr
94G
cfrr
911
cfr
12R1.E01 scf
76.2 %
112.9 %
92.2 &
PARTICULATE LAB ANALYSIS \ PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS \ MASS EMISSION RATES
m 1-LESTP1 IE12J i£5JDl 1.
Vg BE
Front Half
Filter
Back Half
Total
1.13
0.04
0.18
1.35
343.14 x 10
12.15 x 10
54.66 x 10
409.95 x 10
-6
-6
COMMENTS:
TEST CONDUCTED BY:
ROBERT DURGAN
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
SQLIRCE SAUPLTfiG CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COORS PORCELAIN CO. GOLDEN COLORADO DATE- 2/8,9,10/72
STACK- BUILDING 16 RECTANGULAR STACK RUN 3 STARTED 7.00
HEATHER CONDITIONS- COLD AND SUOUI11G PB- 24.72 III HG PS- 24.72 IN Hi
AS- 15 SQ. FEET TS- 540 DEGREES R TH- 536 DEGREES R VF^" 0.338 IN 1120
42- 2.18 III 1120 AN- 0.0007G7 SO,. FEET~ CP- 0.83 VH- 1305.542 CF VC-^-202 )/•/.
SAMPLE TIME- 1386 Mill ORSATt C02- 02- CO- N2-.
DVWV = (0.0474)x7C
)VSTPD= ( ( 5 30 } x ( Vi-1) x (fu-K. Ag . 1 3. o ; ; ; T (. (,29.92;x^/^j ;
3) XT - (VWV) -t- (VSTPD)
4) V = (KW) T (IT)
5) FZM = (1.0) - (W)
6)FMOIST+ ASSUMED MOISTURES-ESTIMATED ON THE JOB
7) MD - (44xfC02) + (32xF02) + (28*(FN 2+FCO) )
8) WS = ( (MD)x(FDA) ) + ( (IB)x(W) )
9) GS = (MS) T (28.99)
10) £M = 100x( FOj-O.SxfCO ) * ( ( 0 . 266xF/i/o )- (FOo- 0 . SxFCO )
. . //^ri\ / TJ \ / ^ //He* nr» no\«/^= ( QD ) x (530) • (TS)
15) VI = ( U) xU/V)x (FDA )x( TIME1 )x( (530)T(r5) )
16)PI50 = ( 100)x( VSTPD)*( VI)
17)PJSOi= ( (5. 626)x(TS)x(ra) ) T ( ( U )x ( TIME ) x ( PS ) x (FDA ) x
18)PJS02~'( ( 0. 00267xKC'x2... ,
12)
4 0 \
lo J _
4 1, \
15)
16)
(AN) ) 17)
) 18)
MASS EMISSION
' 66.82 x 10~:?
44.74 x 10,
0.50 x 10 ,
112.06 x 10
14.22
1073 47
1087.69
0.013
0.907
0.02
28. 9P
28.05
1
0
1 ? ri 0 4
18756
1 R r> 1 1
1 R 1 r, n
1287.57
83.4
122. 3
100.9
RATES
scf
c r* -P
scf
\
f
cfrr
,-
r
scf
%
^
%
y
TEST CONDUCTED BY:
JO I! 11 CHADBOURflE
-------
EJLILB.QN1MU.TAL ENGIN,EB_RING, INCORPORATED
SOURCE SAMPLING CALCULATIONS
PLAilT- COOitH PJXCJLAIi! CO. JOLDi^i -JOLA.lAiJO DATE- 2/6,9, 10,/72
STACK- il'UlijDIHG 16 tii'.C'i'Al'.JilLAR STACK XUi! 4 ^'AilTUD 700
UJAMEli COJDITIOIiJ- COLD PB- 24.72 -T/££ PS- 24.731 I./ //£
/i5- 15 o1..'. F-;^' i\i- 540 DuGiws ;? i'j- 530 Di^aarjs :? ifl^ 0.345 i.v 7/20
£//- 2.17 I./ 7/20 /I.V- O.U00767 J.j. FL'L'i' 6'?- 0.83 V7-> 1276.882 C'F VC-^92 ):'i
SAi-lPL^ TIi!3- 1386 771. / OltSAT: C0'2- 02- . CO- 1:2-
\)VWV - (0.0474)x'/C
2)VS2'PO= ( ( 530 )x( KW)x(POt ( Afl*13. 6 ) ) )T( ( 29 . 92 ) x ( TM) )
3) VT - (VWV) + (VSTPD)
4) H = (VWV) * (7Z1)
5) FD/1 = (1.0) - (V)
B)FMOIST+ ASSUMED MOISTURES-ESTIMATED ON THE JOB
7) WD = (44xFC02) + (32xF02) + ( 2 8x (FN 2+F CO ) )
8) WS = ( (MD)x(FDA) ) t ( (18)x(J/) )
9) CS = (A/S) * (28.99)
10) £/4 = 100x( F02-0.5xFCO )r( ( 0 . 266xFW2 ) - (FO^ - 0 . SxFCO )
11) U '= (174)x(CP)x(tf)x( ( (75x29. 92)T(CSxpS) )*0.5 )-
12) QS = (W) x (4S)
13) yD - (QS) x (FDA)
14)GSFPD= (QO) x (530) * (TS)
15) VI = (J/)xU/i/)x(FD/l)x(j'Itf£)x( (530)v(r5) )
16)PJ50 = ( 100 ) x ( VSTPD) r ( VI )
17)PISOi= ( (5.626)x(7S)x( VM) ) r ( ( U ) x ( TIME ) x (PS ) x (FDA ) x
18)PJS02~ ( (0 00267x VC*TS) t (P^xJSx VM-TM) )-( TIMEx(/xpSxAN
PARTICULATE LAB ANALYSIS PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS
LX} 1 LESTP± LEizl LE$Q! 1
Pg BE
Front Half 11.06
Filter 7.86
Back Half 0.08
Total ' 19.00
1 1
COMMENTS:
1 ) 1 ? r nij
2 ) i oi^ii. n 1 1^
3 ) 1077. •> 7
4 ) 0 « !) 1 9
5 ) o . n r H
6) 0.01
7 ) 9 » . n 9
8 ) 9 0 . F . fi
9) 1
) 10)0
11) 1 •> 7 7 . r,
12) inifiii
13) moni.
14) 1 «r, R •?.
15) 131P) .07')
16) 80. R
(AN) ) 17) 116.7
) 18)07.6
MASS EMISSION RATES
71.18 x 10~^
50.58 x 10,
0.51 x 10 ,
122.27 x 10~J
scf
scf
scf
%
f prr>
cfrr
cfrr
cfrr
scf
^
%
5;
TEST CONDUCTED BY:
JOHN DOLLAR
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL MSIHEERUIG., INCORPORATED
SOURCE SAMPLING CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COOES POREELAIN CO. GOLDEN COLORADO
STACK- SPRAY DRYER
VFATHER CONDITIONS- UINDY COLD
AS- 0.42 SQ. FEET TS- 595.3 DEGREES R
M- 3.25 IN 1120 AN-~Q. 000341 SQ. FEET
SAMPLE TIME- SOU HIH ORSAT: COR-
DATE- 2/16/72
RVV 5 STARTED 6:18
PB- 24.43 IN 1W, PS- 24.43 I/;
Til- 53R.8 DEGREES R 1/1!? \.172 in n?.0
CP- 0.83 VM- G1G.271~C-F VC-
02- CO- m-
3) VT =
4) W =
5) FDA =
6)FM0ISr
7) MD =
US =
GS =
BA -
QS
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13) yO =
1*)QSTPD=
15) VI =
16)PJSO =
17)PISOi=
(0.0474)xVC
( (530)x( IW)
(VWV) + (VSTPD) .
(VWV) T (VT)
(1.0) - (W)
ASSUMED MOISTURES-ESTIMATED ON- THE JOB
(44xfC02) + (32xF02> + ( 2 8x (FN2+FCO ) )
)
( (18)x(f/) )
(
(W5) T (28.99)
100x( F02-0.5xFCO )*( ( 0. 266xfW2 ) - (F02-0 • SxFCO) )
(17U)x(CP)x(g)x( ( (£5x29. 92)v(GSxPS) )*0.5 )•
(U.~) x (AS)
(QS) x (FIM)
(QD) x (530) * (TS) .
(U)*(AN')x(FDA)x(TIUE)x( (530)f(rs) )
( (5.626)x(TS)x(V/.n ) ^ ( ( U ) x ( TIME) x (PS ) x (FDA ) x (AN ) )
1).
2 )_
3).
4).
5).
6).
7).
8).
9).
10).
11).
12).
13)_
14).
15).
16).
17).
18).
13.75
SCf
scf
515.428 scf
0.027 _
0.973 _
0. OG1 _
20 . 99 _
20.7 _
0.99 _
_0 _ % _
4592.4 fpm
1910
cfm
cfm
1GG2
cfm
603.779 scf
.73.4.. %
110 |__
89.9 1>
PARTICULATE LAB ANALYSIS \ PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS
1-LESTP1 ____
MASS EMISSION RATES
Pg BE
Front Half
Filter
Back Half
Total
1.21
19.50
0.71
21.42
1.92
30.87
10
10'
1.12 x 10
33.91 x 10
-3
1-3
,-3
COMMENTS:
TEST CONDUCTED BY:
JOHN DOLLAR
-------
ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED
SOURCE SAMPLING CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COOES PORCELAIII CO. GOLDEIJ .COLORADO DATE- 2/16/72
STACK- SPRAY DRYER RUU 6 'STARTED. 6:18
VEATHER CONDITIONS- WINDY COLD PB- 24.43 Iff 11G , PS- 24.43 Iff 77(7
AS- 0.42 SQ. FEET TS- 598.2 DEGREES R TM- 534 DEGREES R T/H- 1.081 177 7720
A£7- 3.1 Iff 7/20 AN-~Q. 000341 SQ. FEET CP- 0.83 Vli- 559.822 CF VC
SAMPLE TIME- 504 Miff ORSATi C02- 02- CO- N2-
l)VWV =
2)VSTPD =
3) VT =
4) W
5) FDA =
7) MD -
8) MS =
) GS =
10) EA =
11) £/
12) as =
13) ao =
14)<3STPD =
15) VI =
16)PISO =
17)PIS0i=
18)PISOo=
( 0 . 0 4 7 4 ) x VC
( ( 530)x( fM)x.(PO+(A7jf 13. 6)) )T( ( 29 . 92 ) x ( TM) )
(VWV) + (VSTPD)
(VWV) T (VT)
(1.0) - (JvO
v- ASSUMED MOISTURES-ESTIMATED ON THE JOB
(44xf(702) + (32xF02) + ( 2 8x (Fff 2+FCO ) )
( (MD)x(FDA) ) + ( (18)x(f/) )
(MS) T (28.99)
(•i*7Li'\vf/"'P'^xfW'\xf ( ^77CxOQ QO^ — ( r" ^ te "P ^ ^ ^*H ^ ^
J./HyAV.Oi^'tV,n^AV \ Vi.y.A^3»3^^'V,w'
-------
APPENDIX B
-------
INu.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant f^< ;-)/•' " . ~-/cV>~ /i /v ,_ .
Sampling Location' 0^l_Ci'i'C-f
Date 2 /';:;
/;? T... Run No. J
Time Start ;' "/J" Time End
Sampling Time/Point /'•'. '••'•• ' - . { ^$6
DB °F,
WB °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Mo i s tur e Z % , FDA , J8 , Gas Density F act or
Barometric Press^'^'Hg,
Weather C
oU' fl
Stack Press^-^'^'Hg
Temp. t~-, °F, W/D ,1V/ S
Sample Box No, "2. Meter Box No. C"
Meter AH@ /,:
'^' Pi tot Corr. Factor y, ^ "
Nozzle Dia. VW in., Probe Length /.<•' ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/} 2
/
2
1~
2.
%-
/
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
^ ^^
•
/ "/&•
Diameter :-\ in
Area <^>. "^CsS.
Gas Meter
Reading
1^2.. 3
^9//^, /
^
^^ ^
^•^*/
^^. 5
—
..--.
•i
't
/
, x^
/V
i
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
0.52
££'
Q.&-O
(
".
'!__
Mat'l Processing
Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading //7>^^'»//j^' ft3
'Initial Gas Meter Reading "9 •£,"£•. 9 <£5" ^ t3
Total Ccndensate in Impingers 22 £ -<$$$ --/i^nl
Moisture in Silica Gel <
Silica Gel Container No
Orsat: C07
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
^./-z^sr^/gm
,S??,(. Filter No.
Test Conducted by: & , f] //> /^
Remarks :
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
& ACf
V/(!/t?
^,,?g
J?*0?
2,ff
&*£
$•£
sj «
Actual
2-^
$i»o$
2.0%
?.'(£
J'/S
t.3
Stack Gas
Temp.
<5j $
9 (5
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/
/
2, -2.
2-
p^T *-' 2*
!*J.:^'/
1 /
/
/
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
5T*tpJl>
Clock
Time
[o.lf
te.W
//. /<
Hatf.
irtt
/Z.'25
'h\sS
f^~ w
/:*$
/SS
3L -Z-t?
:ZJTJT
3.2JT
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
*Ta/,/
*r^#. i
jrtz.'&t
.^9^. 2L
^?o,^T
«
^^,7
^7^v
7^^. 7
7^59, /
7?0.tf
^aO'T)*/
i
Stack
• Velocity
Head
C"H20)
».6
<$.& /
e.6l
s>.5"*>
d><5>%
€>,g~*~
&,5^
n> 52,
a sfi
0' j~#
o. ^
0,3-3
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. ("H20)
Calc.
2.5
2..^
Z'l
&,/
^ » h
2- 63
p.,€>3
3»*3
3.«Zf
2L.*r
'•> -=L
•*i^« ».- ©
2.33
Actual
5.^
2,V
1.^
7,/
p/ /O
2-i>3
P.^^
^.^?
?. «-?
^. 55-
c"-3 o
?.2xT
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
*7^?
*? 0
3O
*/*
^0
^ 0
CfC*
9fi
•••
9-0
9o
9 o
<=f n
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
7%
?#
?!
$4
ff?
81
Vfl
W
?o
7Z
-:
?•-/
7f
-.
>-•->
,^r)
30
£'&
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°pr
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
1
—
—
^O
(5^5.
^~
.^T^
.^^
"
60
& o
C^^,
GIL
Vacuum
on *'
Sample
Train
&.«
/!.*
t'i.o
n-3
//.$
// y
//^
y/^
tl.3
/2. V
/*>
/2.V
/
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant <^5i*>-'3 . ;-?-•- -/<•$* ••*•-.*• Q U I^J ~£f~ \ (^v-fl
Sampling Location
Date 2./c
7 / J 7__Run No. /
Time Start r) 7 cT0 Time End
Sampling Time/Point -y,'7/. "~ ::P
Meter AH@/ <
f-.% Pitot Corr. Factor
d< '$3
Nozzle Dia. .V-Y in. , Probe Length - '/ ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
2- " t
/
/
7
1*
2.
X
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Diameter fl in
Area ft^
ft
Clock
Time
7.30
#, *-0
&'*3°
C\\ &Q
7! \3°
/o: *&
h' Q&
'••'•
Gas Meter
Reading
•£L?$, /
^^o. 9
^>S9- s?-
«?/«?.^
^ >y£. ^
<^7^^.
@8r#*&
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
of^S
o>&£
n-£%
&•£!&
0.g*j
^-j^V
&,£H
Mat'l Processing
Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading / 2- ? 0 -V5~ ^ ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading &&€>. 7'X/g
1./0
%~tf>
&J&
r.6?. X///^/-^
Stack Gas
Temp.
70
f &
98
OO
Zf&
Cj0
o
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
3L/£>
30
Jo
c$3>
cjO
9o
9o
Last
MpLqger
Test
^/7
,C?
*£3
S.5
<*$£
,£F
tt
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
/2, 2.
ltf*&
/^#
15-2.
I$-Z
ljL-2
il.^
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
C°F-)
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
/2..J
£~*l
$7
V
9.
re
/£>. /
7
/.?£*
o
3
2.. -2-
//, 0
y;
3&
Jt-e
VI
/
//, 0
/. ^Q
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant £s"n'**-5
Sampling Location
Date ? /
/ /
/ (••) / n ? Run No „ I
Time Start ''; 7 cr-o Time End
Sampling Time/Point •' (£ " ->'' ,*{,/. //•••'" <••'/ ;o-
DB<7# °F,
Moisture ^
WB °F, VF @ DP ' "Hg
1 , .FDA , Gas Density F act or
Barometric Press'2 2"Hg,
'.Ve a the r
/•• / A .»//.• s .*
• ' •• * /
Stack Press •-''' "Hg
Temp. " :\ °F, W/D ^ ,W/S
Sample Box No, J2L Meter Box No.
Meter AH@ ',
'"'-. Pi tot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia. •- in., Probe Length ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
^l~ ) /
1
/
f
L
-2-
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Diameter / in
Area ft/
ft
Clock
Time
7.3£>
~*-
3z6< ^
—
3 $7' 1
*it$. ^
H 7¥'^
Mat'l Processing Rate
"-
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
O.f*
fi<^~&
t
^
$.£2.
0 .S7
& ^7
6.^9
Final Gas M
Initial Gas
Total Conde
Moisture in
Silica Gel
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
ster Reading 7 'Zfj . '/ J^ ft3
Meter Reading 2. "?O *£^S~'y ft-
nsate in Impingers ml
Silica Gel
Container No
gm
Filter No.
Test Conducted by: ^-. /7//V /\J
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
2*8
&_* &*$
ty ,* *?
4.®
2.L
£1
2,2-
Actual
2.3$
2,$3
2 03
jLo
1» 1~
'2^12-
Remarks :
Stack Gas
Temp.
f@
73
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
Last
Impirger
Test
,f -f /^
*•" i f^f
4-5*
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
IQ. a
/n. /
/tf.f
7' 1
10. £
fo.3
IQ.4
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
1^
') i
(
f
;
2L
5_
•2-
0^
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
" M-">
Clock
Time
//. /,
// -3 $
/2L>'oG
1^35
f3-'w
IS'35
}4: 05
W 35
S&oS
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
J^ V* ?*/
-?-"..^/ -.'->t--
.— "'
JET2 t
<$7.£
Z0T.&
fc*?r 7
6>&7. £>
£#£• Q
C-*^ / t** /
7^,C / *C
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
tP.5'9
..^
C/ T .-%•.
0. *f&
6.4®
fi ,-fn
tf.^^
^>. .^^
-|5. ^?
<2..< ?
0*^5*^
•
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
. ("H20)
Calc.
2.,2-.
-:/,,;/
f^«
/^^
AJT?
fi»'r>
7^,0%
H*Q%
"3 • fi&
-2. ®f
Actual
^Z.
^--i-
/•^
1>8$
t5 2
{ H&
2,08
&(t$
^, v%
$
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
^ //. c
£\&
q &
°t0
«?o
<7>0
i ^-
90
f? ^
90
•
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
in
^/
*-«
$1
%%
%%
%%
£6
F&
?/
?/
Out
^
7^
7?
7^
7*?
?
<%-&
9.t>
-------
EL. ...bNMl_U E._ JEEC. J, II.1. "
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date '2L-y?r, S r:
'5
Mo i s ture J> %, FDA •-•;"/? , Gas Density F act or
Barometric Pres:Z#7£'iig, Stack
Weather C--:-> t-h
,W/S
Meter Box No.
Temp. L/£)j°F, W/D
Sample Box No.
Meter AH@ /i71/ Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia. /ty in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting 3o
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area &•
• Height.-.-,.;.,--. .<
Mat'l Processing Rate
(Final Gas Meter Reading /Jj? ^ 9,
ft3
rr/Initial Gas Meter Reading
*..•. P- ~
O&Q
,
Total Condensate in Impingers 84- -
Moisture in Silica Gel^.^,z~ -Z./Z.D - /2."Z. gni
Silica Gel Container No. ^^$" Filter No. _
Orsat: C02 _
02 _ . _ _____
CO _ _
N2 _
Excess
Air _ __ ; _ __
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
\
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Wt* !
* I
1
1
r (,,*.:'} /
',':• 'V. ^ /7«
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
/ 7^-
6 ^ t/-
Clock
Time
'^:\y
7!i$
"9:35
/• 'i/S
f '. 1 5
IT 'MS
•"' ' ? 5
•^'.'.in
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
/7t?,--'j
/ #3.0
^
2-2-5. M
'I? 5 2 . 6
a ^£> • 3'
•-^.
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
CPv55
O . .< r»
,-;. J'V"
^>, 57
lD
r. <° <>"
D-O5
J2«^5
^ . 2 n
3x/6O
Stack Gas
Temp.
°J 0
C70
, ' . ,•
fo
0
^o
^0
'' ' / ^'lis; ^*5\.<*.\ \ ^0
Gas Sample''
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
7-
7?-
?f
75
^77
"7?*
Out
7
71
y ^«—
7 ?
"73
"^ py
Sample
Box
Temp.
/2o
)3o
/3o
/..?o
/36
/Jo
Last
Impinge r
Test
V 2_
L/'~L.
S~2
V7
V7
'/7
ij' ~>
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C'Hg)
S
s
• T,£
S-<
_£.^
s- r
2.ot<5
J'XQ s ^'7 1-2^0
/ — " \ * / \
\
-------
s
I-
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
f ' 2.
•
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C-"H20)
Calc.Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on "
Sample
Train
IS*
uin
/to
A
, 5*
. 4~.
I
t
m
60'
L
Uo
5
/JS
/y-5
;;55
21
o ; 25
r?
SJ5
/s
SY
o
s-r
'J
fxfot
T-;/>
s u L.
'2> .-r/-Y\PK
Vrf,
/ Cr>?r;V r
"
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
/)
'
Plant
<*> f-^C. ^ •' //,'//
Cd.0
£>.jr* J. r T
Sampling Location
Date H.~-g|"-7 "Z. Run No.
Time Start £>7.' OY; Time End 3 '
Sampling Time/Point
- °F, WB '
k/
/?:v/;/ .f
DB
F, VFQ DP
^.Moisture 3 % ,FDA ^ "7,Gas Density Factor_
Barometric Press
We a the r <-—_—*'
Temp.Jvj/l°F, W/D
"
g, Stack Press
Hg
Hg
,W/S
Sample Box No. <£_ Meter Box No. /
1 o- -5
Meter AH£/. / c/ Pi tot Corr. Factor £->' ^ ^
Nozzle Dia. /'-/in., Probe Length ^/ ft
Probe Heater Setting 3 & /&
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter 'V''" J-n
Inside Area e>. J> *7 j-?/ft2
Height ..?./-...>/ /y ft
T7 "^
Mat '1 Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
.•-• r/
i i
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
'7130
Y'.ov
'•f''".0
t \\tro
('•": •
.'? . •;•• .^
lO'.ffu
Gas Meter
Reading
s?s. ~s
&-[, "'•'
4 £3
Ot £3
A, il>
\
^ \
• s?iMR
r?, 51
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
S.tifr
2« l/5
2,'/S
J2.7S
/,f'V
I-W
Actual
litt
l.rr
1^2-
JJL.^)
!/•{•(
\**\$
Stack Gas
Temp.
^(0
7o
c-/d
7^>
Gas ^S ample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
7V
^>'v
Jo
T^
^?G
5rO
Out
/3
77
*•"* ->
** «v
v '•vV'
V I
1 77
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO
/?;?
/ v?o
/ ^O
/ y&
^>o
5r^
Last
Inpirger
Test
*/7
V?
•> -^
-^3
v5<0
3"
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
J >
Distance
from End
of Port
(in).
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff.
. C"H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
TO
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
o: ^o
n
'.trt)
to
2-0
zn
cO"
•''
i.
•> <•
2.,
71
I '2 : :>S
. o
/
7?
72
•'•'
. 55
. -53
J2.X5
7,5"
.5-3
, 1 7
0. X5
S3
', 50
-------
Gainesville, Florida j/\^M\ ^f— (^rr^^1^^^'
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET ~~~ ~
Plant <^C>^f?c flrt'?Cr;i./>//J £r-vLD£/j , cote, Mat '1 Processing Rate
Sampling Location /yvl L &-T
Date "2-|*-7l~ Run No, ^
Time Start <£> 7'-CrV Time End
Sampling Time/Point Jt^,.0 / V xvv.^7 ~ *&&•
DB °F, WB °F, VF @ DP "Hg
McistureJB- %,FUA ? 7, Gas Density Fact or *"~~
Barometric Prc:-s "Hg, Stack Press "~ "Hg
Weather ^ /^ £>U>J — C.O-^
Temp. Jo '5 "F, W/D -~ ,W/S —
Sample Box No, i <&3
" /, ty
Nozzle Dia. /'»/ in. , Probe Length ' ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter o in
Inside Area 0»2>HC(\^L
Height K^^n. f /5 ft
W7/ • r
/
^ ^
Final Gas Meter Reading!, ')J^<-f' ^'3^ ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading % 7* ~~?~7'~7 ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers ml
Moisture in Silica Gel gm
Silica Gel Container No. to-2-jT Filter No.
Or sat: CO?
. 02
CO
N2
Excess .
Air
Test Conducted by: r\i Duft6~fJA^
Remarks: ^£)>DfJl /\(J/V y7'^/?7'£"^D
jP/?$>?f •+. gsr^ &/?55-!7/Kj £• O
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
tyr% '~l I
fa1Y' "-'--
f
T_
"2-
AlT /
v 1
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
07:30
,o
fX"; 7-y
^ eA
o 1 ; So
/O-'.trp
OF= -StoAT C-tnf.^'iT Oft £*.?£• Syoe.fr,
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
^7 . 7L
'017-1
— .
&^\
o> ^/
•^ )
.0* ZL
o, £3
Meter
Orifice -
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
1-35
5-35
2,35
2-.2.Z
Ji«Cft)
^L»CLp
Actual
2t(rt)
2.,*7>
j.tjS
/•°I5
MS
/,c)5
Stack Gas
Temp.
TO
CjO
<3o
10
1 ^O
^ 0
°io
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
75
"?">
tft>
1Ts>..
£-2-
^JL.
Out
73
"??
7J
7X-
"73
73
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO
*»
-—
—
—
— -
^u -" LJ
Last
Impirger
Test
J C
z? ""-"**
57
"31
JJo
LfG>
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
•2J
-?-!
^ 1
>L\
Tli
2^
-------
ort and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
. ("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
17
77
/7
o. 56
^
-7
'
r ,-TQ
77
J
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location /?//.•• .'.'.. — /\ec,7-
Date . '. / >: / ~>l Run No, ' '
Time Start
Time End
Sampling Time/Point
DB "in., Probe Length_
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter--'
Inside Area /-r
Hei ght
in
ft2
ft
2-
O O O C>
O
A
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading^
Initial Gas Meter Reading 3 Y»
, 4- 8 4-
ft5
Total Condensate in Impingers/ ?8-
Filter No.
Moisture in Silica Gel£5#./- 2/^.g - -4-2.
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
S^ o
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
L'fjf vtf>,.
' :••'• 6
fL? f
^
3
e!li
2 %
1 *?d*
ICL *%±
/*
Z3 Y*
&9\4
Clock
Time
/-?
$'-f*
^'.o?
V£6
7'-*s
f/3f
7/^-3
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
73*7
33- /
?z- 1
62-7
&i>?
^S'^
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
./5
•/•*
-/1
-/5-
*//
./^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
Z.&
2-t
2>?,
?.•3
i'6
?,6
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
81
%&
J?
7?
%
M
Out
?4
73
?3
*}2
?2~
?**
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
4*
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C"Hg)
2-G>
^^>
2^>
^.<^
-z
-------
3ort and
Traverse
Point No.
7
- - - . ~~
< •/ /
2.
• 1
.--
"^
'V
-- >:•'' *f
/
2.
•-' *r >5
>^
g
'y ^
7
J?
/
3,
3
^
^
£
Distance
from End
of Port
*-* ' \
-- - J f' '
*~ • ' :• ". '
Clock
Time
o?/2
7 35
¥ ^
f ' /3
7 - <9^
$ :^Y
g; -^o
8 ' *?
11 '-0?
10-56
J&'4$
lg^_C[
!&'/%
7^f
7 -f ^
/* - 2^
fL'lS
ti';0z
.' . • ' .*
-' r *"* V
. //; ^cl
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
jf 7, f / 2-
3^; ^/^
/&$.$
l*=>7 • 6
/f7, 5
/ 36, &
1 ~3~5< 3
//5~' /
IO1>5
%44't
-£33-6
Z 23 '• ^
2 /^- f
2.^3" ^?
\3%-4
/7?'^
3/J5. -f
305.4
•' ' • ' ." -"">' £».
-" - .f ••/
-^*Tt •--! T^ *^
/ /.£-. . 0
•7&6.T-
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
*/f5"
OJ3
O.lAft
'/*40 •
^/BO
* /3&
-7/5-
*I/S
&* 12-
0-13
o>r/
0-12.
0*1(35-
S)*l2-
0-/2L
-•? •-. o
* •- /
O- /C*
,-> .v")
' -' e / s-'
^, ^9
D./<9
0*01
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. (MH20)
Gale.
."-•'-•£/'
xO ^**
*"|V '*^ /%
.rl - ^
•• '•
''*.<• ''
— ' ^ ^.
••/ -i
>i^
2-33
. • • •
.:->./. :}
> • . -
''\ -'-,-
^ • •
( ' 1 •' (
• • •/
/.c!~i
/;??
/ r. />'*
* J> "•
* / *C-
/476
Actual
-' > -~
?.s
"• . ' •
. •, ...
. - •• .'
;.--/
..?' -
t. . f —
Z. 33
'' ' .;-*
.'-'.'';-.
' ','•; -;
/ 7^
/.#?•
f , i £•
/• ,' •>
/ ^ • w-
/ • ' f> .
Stack Gas
Temp.
go
-
—•
'• /
-~. »,
,-."' >
1
$:>
Q ^
& ^
v/ /
A, -
"f"
t" ' • '
S '"
sV
77
7 /
-//
;/.'?
* •* *>
. ' :. >
7^
Out
' .-
77
•""•*"" '
??
.. \
- ' ,• ,
•' /
>-/
* t?
'• :
"l/5"
•,v;<
•"•' ; ;
* .* • /
7^
•_,v^
/<
y.^
.1 1 •"
73"
Sample
Box
Temp.
££#
Last
Impinger
Temp.
4 ^
45
-
t? *^^
".V
. •"
Vacuum
on *'
Sample
Train
19
ft
ff.6
£0
2O
2O
H
14
/&
i?
if
j$2»*r
H
}?-- 2
]?> 2-
1.0
/:>. •:">
"/>£
-••'. -^>
/o
9
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
. C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
7
///
SD
77
1-61
1-57
go
372 -7
A
75'
I
/•zr
f-75
75"
353- /
O-lo
{.75
0-/0
to
,7
323-?
I-7B
So
> D7
5-0
2-
77
?
9
4.
ft-l
2-
ttz-i
0- IIS
7
11*0
&±
7
76
7*%
,y
n
o
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
£-7-72.
/**•/*
fo£T*&>
. ft 7
£>
6
4
3
Z,
/
r> '•*"'' ^~
1 fc~ ?
c
-, <£.-/•£;•
Clock
Time
*' ..
^ «1
?>/?
•y>;-> f
23*16
07Z7
O&08
oB 11
O&'bO
9&4-1
0652
0^ DS
09 74-
^^?^^
^9 J^
o«7f 7
n3-?%
I00£
6o(*. 2.
5/7, 3
^£7,9
^35-^
34B.7
$5 9. 7
S70-9
- . g
£of-<3
&i£>?
£2*?. 1
6 ^>?\\?
o»n '
O'IZ.
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
. ("H20)
Gale.
2.7
Actual
2*/
^,; '2^
2->
2-^5*
2 -2o
2*/2
•2,<^
?.7
2.7
2.55
-2.35
Z./£
e.^^
i™ * >^VWv^
2.7
^,75
^.7-r
2. >
2-^-
^2fcP
^/2L
2'J£
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
^0
%0
30
%0
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
in
^
^
74
7^
77
78
-78
~7§
79
•71
9o
fit
v$
&
$2.
tfl
$0
Out
>^
73
7Z
73
73
7^3
73
73
73
7£
7^
?-T
AT
^
?-T
P^
AST
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
4-0
18
Vacuum
on "*
Sample
Train
/O
/£
/t>
/&>
/*•
//
9-0
/D.&
/%,
/£
/9
19
tr
!?..$
"^e
/0*>*
//. -2
/)
l'8
-------
Dort and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
. ("H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
10 .?
0*1(0
So
/>
3*12.
/
1
79
n tt,
D./D
n s7
7/1. J
LT?
75
"
if
O.JD
7°!
75
f
9-0
/2/0
2*02.
2.
, 4.
2-12
A
75
,0
773.1.
o.
So
2./Z
-2..IZ-
81
75
9.8
A
/
f /
221-S
?.
••-T ±
'.•y
A
A
f\
/..
-------
Sfl
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
-1
?•
- z
/6-* /
2-//s/}2.
' /
farrr*
,,r ?
/ X
6.
"^>
/
— --' <•*•
'•«>-< -?*
., y ?
/
•*-- •»
- /
.>-
«>
'7
/
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
;
)
u- r
^v^*
''.-'"/' '• ;
Clock
Time
MZ$
/441
. -* >•• **
f •• j <* « x *
/ / ./ rS
!5&&
- ^ 2->
6B/^
OB 24
og37
6B4<3
££5?
£?/£>
09^/
09.^^
094-3
O3 54*
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
. L
/03?-3
'/ozo.4-
'101,1, f
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
0~IQ
' e>*ia
/) '^?.^
r>^^^
~^£
6r/6
0./8
0./6
S> . 1 4
&J4-
0.12.
0 JO
0./4-
c>. 14-
o./4
o-ft
0./4-
o./z.
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
l?f
hlr
/^7
M<
3.1
<./
'3,6
3./
3-/
^.7^
^.3^
/>9^
Z.-7&
2*7 £
?..7£
2.76
-Z.75
'£.*>£
Actual
/ • ?JT-
/-7.T
A^J
AV^<
^'/^
2^7^-
Z.g
z,a
^•?
2.7^7
2.35
/.9S
^7^
Z.7^"
Z. Z^
^.75
Z, 75
^.35
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
•
go
&^
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
^?
X^'
7?
*?
>1
7^
7t>
7£>
*};*
/<^<1
77
78,
77
7t>
'7&
7(>
7C*
77
71
Out
te
'>JT
^f
>4
>z
72.
"7Z,
7Z
?2~
7Z-
72-
7Z
7/
7/
?/
-//
?/
7i
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)-
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
Vacuum
on ^
Sample
Train
V&
<=?,o
•*™> f
;•/*• r>
^'?
l?'2-
/?'£-
/?, z
/^.e
19- Z
/?•*-
/f
&
/?.z
/?-2
/f.2-
/f -z
/^^
//
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft*)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
. (MH20)
Gale. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp <@ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
Out
Sanple
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
ft. 7
JOO&
V.\\
1-16
7/
5
4
/
D.JL
O./2-
7S
72
r
D*l
fi
11 11
-2-2-
112.2-
2,02.
72.
3..02-
72,
till
4
/I XT*
2,02-
3
I.20&
2- IS"
J2.2.2
0*10
A52T
71
-/ 7
f /
0-/0
-
/
.£>
O-IO
I/
. 7
0.10
y/
3
O./D
7/
(9, 08
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Ljo^i.
[/-#" >
I/ ^
s~
^
3
2,
~ /
'
Distance
from End
of Port
(in) .
.
Clock
Time
14&or
i4n
141.2-
/$33
H44
H~£f
/&&&
•
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
2. &$< <&>
29Vv 9
3<25~- Z.
1/5"- ^
J^5°-^
$3.£hS~
$1$. 4#4
Stack
Velocity
Head
. ("H20)
(O- //
O'tl
0*1/9
o-(i
O'fo?
O'Og
O>O%
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. ("H20)
Calc.
£./$""
1./T
21*22-
2../JT
2.02.
/<53"
f'fS'
Actual
— *^ "* r^~-^
^V * ' /V-J"*
2,za
ZV^~
2.^52-
/^S'
/srS*
Stack Gas
Temp.
-
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
T1^
?<3
?/
7/
7/
?/
7t
Out
^^
^^
^^
^^
^ ^
^g
^F
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
-
.
Vacuum
on *
Sample
Train
^ ' 7
f.7
*?-7
*?> ?
$.
!
I)
B
/ o
. d>
-------
Plant
j IlNL.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
,D
Sampling Location ^/^
•#.9t IQ} #72Run No.
Time Start Fe-b 8 Time End Fcb /O
Sampling Time/Point //// 'I'/fl-
DB 8O °F,
Moisture
'
F, VF@ DP
"Hg
, FDA _ , Gas Density F act or /.£>
Barometric Press^Tg'Hg, Stack Press2&72'Hg
Weather C "' / V
Tenp. °F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No, 3 Meter Box No._
Meter AH@/C££Pitot Corr. Factor__^
Nozzle Dia.^.3'/win., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter 6'^-^c->^in
Inside Area /j$'_ tt2
Height 2.3 ft
\
FAff
^o
/o'
i/
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /&O7.3/'2- ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading gg£>,*£3Q ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers Sc^-^te - -
Moisture in Silica Gel^^/7,^ - z/&. / -
/ . -'"^
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
3£B-1
3??~S"
3&?> a
JurZ-6
31*-' $
^Sg'%
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
-/A21
• JoZ.
>/ljr
*/Z0
- J2&
-/Jo
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
/.£?
/*&-
2
?0
70
70
?*
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO
Last
Impirger
Test
TO
^
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
^T
5~
3
?
?
?
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
7
fof ' 2.
(:::. 1
7-
_?:
f
£
&
7
/ >O" 3
/•••'. /
2.
3
#*- /^ ^
/f. /
z
^
¥
3""
^
Distance
from End
of Port
. fin) ;
• V-' .,-
*"" "2. /*•/'
_^> «_? ~/ 2Z*
Clock
Time
07/JL
9 '3,-T
^ ': 2X/
?'-/3
*?'o^
#-'oV
%'-^0
^•2^
//-(>?
/o : j(#
/&',*£
/$ : 219
/o:/%
9'J"7
<3' sj /
/ • f &
/z : t4~
/2V3
/2:,o^
?}:,-;
// Vd>
Ifirf
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
^?" ^
£43*^
*H Q» O
4^^
/I 1 £ /
lib- b
4-£>&'£~"
3f i- ^
5Z7'?
,<;?.-_)
^O5. "2-
^/'7 ^- 6?
4BS-9
-197.I
4MJ
.
^./^5>
^), //
"/2:<9
-Z^£>
- /^^
•/fS~
•/fS?~~
O. 10
o~ //
D. /o
O*/O
Oa 10
£>* /O
&.//
0-/I
o*c$
c?./^.
i.%// -
^'//
2«3£~~
2..^
Z-0
Zr£
/•*£
/.&
/,:;
/95
1^6
Actual
/, ££
!+$£
3 * /$
P.*3s~
*L* ,?,
^. 01
«S»O
A ^
A<^o
/^J"
I.B4
/, ^r~
/-^5"
/.f^r
/•L^
SL.JO
/> 9^
/*':fj
/ • / ^-^
Stack Gas
Temp.
TO
go
?*/
So
?J_
60
So
&£>
So
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
in
70
7z
7?~
72-
J3,
*1 /
71
7)
72
7L
•^f **"}
• t^^
7:i
72
73
/ <*-
73
-72.
72
*" * '
T1* ••'•'
7£
Out
70
7/
72.
7/
7/
?/
•77
7/
7£
/ i--
7z
7^-
7ZL
7^-
72.
72.
72
72
* ^ -«•
. c~
7a
Sample
Box
Temp,
TO'
ZZ£>
Last
Impinger
Temp.
TO
*£
.o
7*0
&,
-------
Dort and
Traverse
Point No.
7
ft. I
7.
3
4
/5 ft
/3®fo
/ *2 * f "7
/ £—*•* ^s /
JZ'.^t,
f *^ *_^««-jr
/// J&pfi
:'•: :$
14-47
14 zt,
/4^5
/£/£
14-03
/36Z-
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
^37.^
—
>" /' "7 /N
1 <» ^x!^/ <-x
£ ^/.^
^59-9
6/73
—
!/ ~7/' C? ~7&/
" / Cy-^J * 'Oo
/ u'Z* "7
74- / , ^
7?o.7
7/8.4
7?&&. 8
c^i' ?>
£> 84-, 3
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
o./f
0, /Z.
0, M
O ./4
O.lS
o. i4
o - /<$-
O-fT-
O.//
O. l-2>
0. id
0 , /£>
O* /i
O. /£
0,13
•
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
. ("H20) -
Calc.
/ f 6
~2..J
'Z.J?
7, £
Z.73
*2^
Z.£6
?J&
/•?5
z.z£
z,£
z.9
Z-1
Actual
/ o <"
2.y
*7 f**
'Z,^
Z.73
2L^
1.££
Z./<3
/ ?5
-£•?£>
Z>*>
Z, 9
z-1
276 Z-7-5
2.36
7.3$
Stack Gas
Temp.
go
go
go
80
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
72
7£
7^
76
76
~7
7£>
Out
72
73-
7<2
-/<£_
74
73
73
73
7£>
7&
~7&
75
7-6
73
74
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
tS'
&^
Vacuum
on '
Sample
Train
7.&
&,<$
£.0
s.z
f .L>
&~&
&.3
&.O
6,2
7.6
8.2.
//>&
//.O
7.6
-7*0
'
-------
Dort and
Traverse
Point No.
£-
5"
^
Distance
from End
of Port
(in).
&* Press. ^
Clock
Time
&.*5"
07/8
07Z?
27<£4
0757
OBoS
o&n
£g3O
084-1
O85Z.
0 ?03
07/4
&qt6
;*) Q $£
09"* ?
oq r %
IO&'?
102O
/o }/
so 4 a
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
7^3, 78&
774 .£
-78^. 8
793.7
SOZ.7
8//. Z
d/9. Z
527. Z.
,936 . e
B4^.a
8^^> .3
564 . 7
$?$- $
GZZ. 8
&?/. 9
72+0-0
?2.9*2
Stack
Velocity
Head
. ("H20)
o./4
o.n
O.I!
o.//
o.o^
o.og
0.08
f
o. lo
OJI
O./D
0./&
0,0^
0-10
O*f)9
A* 10?
o*/r?
6'f$~
O*/G
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
. ("H20)
Calc.
^5
X.75
/.^
/.^
A^
A/z
A^z
/.B£
/.96
/.8*
/.«
A £5
/. ^5"
//&£
{»?€>
/>*?&:
h6
/.4-Z
/.4-Z
/#£
/.93
/.B£
/.BS
/>(,$
/.?r
t, £.?
l-fo
/. ?&
f,tf-'~>
•" f ; v.j-
1 X*^ -*•'***>
/' g&
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
go
%o
80
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
7/
70
6?
70
7^
7o
7o
70
70
70
77
7/
?/
?Z
>2,
?/L
^
>2
Out
7^
7/
y/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
7/
>/
7/
>/
^/
>/
>/
Sanple
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
4-G
18
Vacuum
on *
Sample
Train
0.2.
£>,£
&.Z.
&.Z.
3.Q
4-7
4->7
6.2
Z, 0
£>8
6.3
6*7
{.2
£-2
£-2.
£• 2.
<•?
6-Z
8
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
fi>&£ 3
ft 3
Z
f
fotr&i-
;..f >
C
^ /
far* &
ft. 7
&
6
Distance
from End
of Port
(in) .
Clock
Time
/£>53>
//f>4
// /^
!> - .<
7/37
//4S
//.>'C7
A2 /o
7227
/tl2>^
724-3
f2.64-
/305
;?>/£
/3^7
/^>3§
7349
/<^>
/^//
./#/>
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
??8 , ^
9^./?
?6g,a
977. 9
%V'- «
^7 ••? .? . ;
/c>c^<- ?
lo^.o.o
/.^3^^
/040-1
—
7^73.7
/o8^.^
/o-/4
0./4
Q./6>
0~/7
OJl>
€>. M
O./*
O./L
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
. ("H20)
Calc.
/.<&
IA$
/.94
A«^
;,f£
•z./
2*2
7 *?2.
""i ,»•• 1
. > >• ^ .
2.3^
7,35
2-35
Z.6Z
Z.4Z
Z<^
-s.l
z.<*
«••? cf O
/J- t , •' (i...
2^2
z^
Actual
•
795
/^
/ 93
/, tf
M£
?>)
.2 * .i:
2^2
* ! • , >
^ 3 5'
•Z.35
"Z-35
Z.Z'Z
Z,£t
-2,*}
3.7
2.?
_
•
k, i ,,;.» c.
ZJ-* W,
.3^«.
z..«?
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
•
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
JL
7Z
73
73
73
7^'
73
;^
>/
>f
7^
7£
7(>
7t>
7&
-7&
7&
7&
w$ v*
.<•' / ->
-y <-•
/v>
7^
Out
7Z.
7a
7Z
73
73
73
?^
/ir
>^
~? d-
?4
7^
75-
7£
7^"
75-
75
.' *','A
75
7^
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
&.£
6.4
&>4»
6 , &
fet^-->
F-O
»~
o d
/". - ^f
-?-c'>
#.£>
^?.o
^,0
^.^>
9^
fD.7
12.0
/@,Q
Q.o
y-6>
70. f
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
f^o^r^C
ft- 4-
3
t
\
1--/D-72
&£T -* 1
ff. 7
6
^
4-
j>
2,
I
fofttz.
fr 7
£
5
4
3
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
.* = 24,
Clock
Time
/4-3$
1*1 "^/i
1 4-^-5
l$0&
83
0720
07 3 1
O7 4- 2
0763
oQo^
o 8 16
o B 7 A
0837
OS 4-8
08^9
09/0
o°i2l
OJ3Z.
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
//55. O
//££* 1
/I7£.
//%£>. 3/£
//96>.o
I-Z.DZ.4-
/ZZ5 . 8
J-Z30.B
/Z4-Z* 4-
/Z6/ '" /
1 Z 5 9- 8
—
1178 -O
/z8&>8
/Zct6,5
Stack
Velocity
Head
. ("H20)
O./£,
OJ4
O-I3
£>.//
t.
o.n
0,1O
Oo/t-
O. lo
O.ll
0-/I
O-Ocf
O -O^
o./o
0,10
OJP
O,10
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
-£.<}
2.^2,
?,$£•
IA5
Af5
/•8&
2.1
/,&6
A 93
/' 9^
/,£>£
/ , (r> 5>
1,8$
/,8 5>
1, 65
{.86
Actual
•£7 #
2.5*2.
2/3 r'
/Q g'
' I \^
/, 9£
J-8&
Z/ /
/,8£
/ 9 ^
/> 9£
/.£>£
I-£>S
It O S
/•8£
/,8$
/>8&
Stack Gas
Temp.
•
so
Bo
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
in
7£
76
/^?
7f
70
£8
£>7
&&
&&
&£>
C£
(^> ^^
C& ^2
&<,
£5
£6
Out
75
73
^W ^^|
*^7 ^t
70
70
70
£9
£9
£3
& 8
£>~7
£>&.
44
o o
o o
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
Last
Irapinger
Temp.
ra
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
/O.4-
g-^
*/, >
£.2
7.0
//^ ^ £,J
C^ * c5
^. B
&.0
&-O
£.0
3*0
£.0
£>.€>
6>.o
&. O
8
-------
Dort and
Traverse
Point No.
fy/n-t 2
ft. ^
f
far? 3
ft 7
L
$
4-
3
Z
/
.-,;•-/ '-4
,/- /
' £
9
t
>
2
/
<-^f- "'• '.
' ,x' ?
./*
"/
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
//
7
Clock
Time
6^3
o?54
100£
Jo /k
/o £7
/0 ^£
t&l?
llo-tr
li //
a 22-
// 1 Z
//H
l/ff
1206
12. 1 />
1228
12. $9
/2.F&
/3GI
/?/&
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
7306. /
/tV3,£
—
- — _
/34-A?
tea.?
*.:•&- !
^>?* 7
}?7..0
$?8* ?
t<78/>
O*/2-
6*15
0-/2-
0~/4
9- /4
1-/6
O.K
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. ("H20)
Calc.
/>85
/. te
/.IS
/>B$
/.7$-
'/.9*
l Q'^
/-- / r
2>/0
2-3r
2t<&
2-£
*•> s
/ ;j.
~> l^
J_- * / "
7L.H
Actual
A^
J,£>5
/•IS
/-^
/•^
/•K
/^
Zree-
/>&
^L'2^
Z-/0
?31~
2-3^
zt
&">
£8
Out
^^
^^
£6
^
£,£>
£>&
&&
&£
6&
t>£
{*&
A&
4&
67
(7
<-?
&>
t?
£?
(>7
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO
Last
Impinger
Temp.
TO
Vacuum
on •*
Sample
Train
£.0
5.O
£.TL
6.2.
6. -2.
&.-Z.
&. 2.
&> 2L
& &
7' Z
?- /
?,Z
/e
'•• .>
?- 7
(*• 9"
T>0
1- &
lo.?
/(
7 &v~ 8
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
('Of-!* 6
ft 3
z
I
ftzr* L
ft. 1
£
5
f
3
2
^ /
X
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
/3£7
A33&
15*17
/4 frr
H It
M?.'Z
M?2
'Mil
,/f5T
/f<36
Gas Meter
Reading
C£t3)
3^4.3
5/7. 7
£"2£- J£
&?3
?
0. U
&«/£
Oh
0-/2.
frlZ.
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
Z.te
-Z..&&
z,4$
jr.gr
.$< *,&>
2.?f
2-^?
2,6
tJ
2./
Actual
2..9S
-L.&S
Z.46
Z'g>
><:&
*2-7f
2>?$-
z,6
2-/
*2'/
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°FD
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
t>$
&
^
^
^7
6?
£7
W
+,7
6?
Out
63
&B
68
£$
tf
£%
6>Z
t&
^
£?
Sample
Eox
Temp,
TO
Last
Impinger
Temp.
C°F)
Vacuum
on <
Sample
Train
//
10
&.?-.
I3-6
/$.
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant L^OO /C^> /&*-''{' f^s st/sJ (~ O.
Sampling Location ^>/?r.a-r £>n!Cr"
Date £-/£- 7£ Run No. 15"
Time Start O&/& Time End /SO7
Sampling Time/Point /^^ -^f (Toia 1 — S&^Mw }
DB //£ °F, WB 7*7 °F, VF @ DP /. £ "Hg
Moisture £./ %,FDA t).*4 ,Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press 2443"Hg, Stack Press 2#.£3"Hg
We a the r U)i uo" — 0 * " /
Temp. 4-0 °F7w/D ,W/S
Sample Box No. ^/ Meter Box No. O
!Vt
Inside Area ft^
Height ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /^^/. ^ ~// ft:
Initial Gas Meter Reading 7*2. £* Z O O f t-
Total Condensate in Impingers — » (o^ ml
Moisture in Silica Gel £^ 3. 7 —23P& — 33-3^
Silica Gel Container No. tZ'Z.S Filter No..
Orsat: C0? Ot(
02 £t),6
CO —
N2 79. 3
Excess .
Air
-rf*"* 1^ '/
Test Conducted by: JA Oo //.7r"~
f~~ m~*~" '
&— » , •^.|l i) *-r*^ ».•!,.
' /
Remarks : ,/SV*:/r v ,„-; /.^ / • ;/,- o ^ / ^ £2.5 '-
^,,;'»- > '/ .- r ".> » • '' «- rV :^ y" o -^ / T.
/ .
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/J />
wr //
ft I
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
/7?>3
o 748
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
726.200
— •
76/. 2
77^.4
/^ -d)
^/5 . i>
53/.0.
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/.*;
•1.4-
I. 45-
/. -^-5
A ^^
1.43
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
4^
J 2
•-,..?
.:;t ^
4>5
J ,.y
*•*•' ' ) C J
-^
Actual
3./
-3V
3,3
3,3'
C-?.--
34
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/IB
/SO
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
&>
&
6(
£1
<£
£8
Out
£3
-•*.. •
* i *" •
^
^
^'y
^;>
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
/ZO-faD
Last
Impinge r
Test
(°F)
^/
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
/7.3
/7-.-r
t " r ~- *
/ '' ' "'
/7.f
/7.5
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/:•-" a
ft. /
ft z
fi>.cr S
f-t-.-i
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
/ K->
7 <%-L
/
f
/
?£'
-- / //•>'
* / /3Z.
X
S
f
JL.
t \
Clock
Time
f>3/>J>
r>Z}?>
3-"3S>
024.2
s\ C~' -\ '~J
^ ^ .' •?
oei4-3
/5 ,' %
I 0 4 £
1 1 i£
//4£
/2£3
/2J3
/t43
>'-' /'.:
/343
14)3
14-4-5
l^i
1507
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
,->,•> / , , — i
."'• ' <". /
r- .'/ A
t> ^^ , v^
^ ^. 5
^ 0/. 7
^•P.^
^37,/>
772. •.-'?. 0
iom.t
/^>7^.Z
M4.3
//32.. 22C>
//sz. ^^^
/^ 7, ^
/ZD3«4
17^.6
/2VX.£>
/5/2 -3
T^ .<9
rw, --7/
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
/.^
/^.-•'5
/, «^'
/, «
/.^
/. ^
/.33
/. 3d
I .? S
1 ,S
/•sr
A^
/."> 5
A 3^
A 35
/ -/ /^
A^O
1*30
J,?>r>
•
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
.(MH20)
Calc.
,4 .f>
^. '^
4.3
z
4>Z
4.o
!,*>
Actual
5", 3
5^-
5V ^
3.3
^, ^
3.3
t:^
S.^
S.^
^.^D
3,35
•^ ,'.?S"
3,E
5.Z
?.s
a/
:?,/
3./
:->, /
Stack Gas
Temp.
ra
t
•
I4&
/So
7/
7/
72
7~"
7?
7?.
*!
Vf
^
??
^?^
^-> o
• )
9/
92
K
9£
'/ 1
Out
/ •--••
<£? £-
/- ''.
£<:
£S
K.5*
^,<
^7
/^
7?-
75
^3
7?
7^
- .... .
/0
f2
84-
o/
G&
^C>
Sample
Box
Temp,
ra
Last
Impinger
Temp.
C°F)
18
<*3
J8
Vacuum
on *'
Sample
Train
/T:^
/X5T
X2-5-
/7
//
/7
/7
/7
/7
/7
/7
/;
XT'
/7
//
/7
/?
/r
/•/
-------
HI IONM M. L ...KEEL. J,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date ."3 — /o-77^ Run No.
Time Start O £ /8
'Time End
7
Sampling Time/Point/^) ffi- tffc/t/*
DB //£ °F, WE 97 °F, VF § DP /,J>
"Hg
Moisture .•<. / % ,FDA Q.^-i ,Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press#»4£"Hg, Stack Press2^.43 "Hg
Wea ther .//;• i " ••- v-':.--»/
Temp._££__°F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No. Q Meter Box No. /
Meter AH@/.7r Pitot Corr. Factor £>. Cg
Nozzle Dia.ft.2£ in., Probe Length <=£ ft
Probe Heater Setting £?3_"-Q
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter •%
Inside Area
Height
in
Tt2
~ft
--
72"
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
•7
Initial Gas Meter Reading jg''?/. <
Total Condensate in Impingers —
Moisture in Silica GelZ^2.3 -
ml
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C07 & /
°2 .
CO _
NZ.
Excess
Air
Filter No.
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
;y •»;
rlv^r ^
/-/. '2-
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
-/ /<'
/ X52.
Clock
Time
OA/3
o ^ •/• •?
V_- I "' i _ ^
0648
07?>3
07 /B
C)7 U
0748
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
37/1 #30
.
.#':;•, >'
4/?.3
43<,4
430.*)
4&7* 1
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Af
•/.3
/. a5
A 35
A3
/^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
£ 2
/•».->'
4.0
42-
4-t
4^
4/0
Actual
2*^
2, g^
.:'"» /
3./
a/
37
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
1/8
/SO
Gas Sample
Temp . @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
(,/
£>!
&
£>£>
W
•70
Out
5' Cl'
."
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
far £
Pi-. 2
/v ./
?etT A 1
ft.l
Distance
from End
of Port
. (in)
7'%r.
/ %:•
<•
•\
i
>•
V7 ^,
>
/
V
\ »
. / •
Clock
Time
09f>5
3?/.?
&*;?.'-•
D*-??>
'-, .:• 1 v
3-"1 •'.-
rf 9?-£
/£ / £
M 4/£
) / /a
/v; 3
// T &
/^D3
/?t?
/Z^3
/-• fr
' ' . ' '
75^3
/^/5
/^.?
/^9
/6o 7
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
4 ??-.>'•
4^, 7
<" / -" /
-•» / ••
.<-/. P
SJS.4
564.6
• ~->-/ t\
1 ' v *
L?S. 7
.4^1. /
£?3,.£
7 ^ bT 7
74?.&£
74Z.64&
-774. 2
8o&+7
g3?.^
877.,^
qo5. o
^//,?
93/^Z^
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
' /, 3,9
A 75
/. zo
/, -^5-
7,^5
/.a£
/.z$
/.2S
/ ,2/3
/ .- ?. ^
7,3^
/ ,Z^
*
/.#>
f),n
0^7
0,97
f).97
0.9-7
D^l
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
. ("H20)
Calc.
•f ^
*"" , H"
^.^>
C? "'. '
4,2
4,0
4 />
/ / •*
^ /)
-^. ?-;
>.K
43
?.7S
-
3,e5
•-•» .•
->. /
3.1
3>i
3.1
3*1
&t .
Actual
3.1
~>!
:-'',/
3>Z
-3. "7
SM-^# ^-
3,Z
3,2,
3,/
3./S
S.I
.3,/
?- 1
3.1
3-/
3.1
3./
3.1
3*1
a/
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
•
;43
/<0
ens- /A'y
W£* f*G
/:-' / ' — " '
J j ^ r.- i'.3' i
/..S
^^
^7
^^
^^
^r^
7^
7 ?
7^
73
?/,
• _•"
78
fa
£~>
86
#&
&
W
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp'.
ra
4$
43
£S
t x~ *** • •' ' ''
Vacuum
on ^
Sample
Train
t*'~
i^<
'/?.S
/9.S
/-..<
s?
79
M
/i
>ct
7V
/
-------
Plant
/£>
0f'C£t.f?<'sJ
Go.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling LocationS/cJi
Date Z-/7-
Run No.
Time Start //ZO
Sampling Time/Point_
°F, WB '
Time End
DB
F, VF @ DP
"Hg
Moisture % ,FDA_
Barometric Press,
We a the r
Temp. °F, W/D_
_,Gas Density F act or_
Stack Press
"Hg
,W/S
Meter Box No.
Sample Box No. Q
Meter AH@ /f ^Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia.fi, o-.$_in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
in
Tt2
" ft
Mat'l Processing Rate_
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers -—
Moisture in Silica Gel
ml
gm
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C09
Filter No.
. 02 _
CO _
N2 _
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
rfort~;&Gt
~7~
~e<>
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
£"£*fa
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
1/20
MOB
1*1^5
Gas Meter
Reading
(£t3)
^^715bO
183.&00
9 88. $33
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
—
—
—
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
—
—
—
Actual
/^
/^
A-5
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
8Z
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
69 1
7^
73
Out
7O
73
73
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
&*z.
&o
3%
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
/o
/&
/o
-------
APPENDIX C
-------
COMPLETE SAMPLING PROCEDURES FOR BERYLLIUM STACK EMISSIONS
Sampling Procedure
Prior to performing the actual beryllium emission tests,
certain preliminary stack parameters had to be estimated or determined
for each source. This preliminary data included.the average temperature,
velocity head, moisture content, stack diameter, and number of sampling
poi nts.
The stack gas temperature was determined by using bimetallic
thermometers and mercury bulb thermometers.
Velocity head measurements were determined across the stack
diameter by using a calibrated S-type pi tot tube with an inclined man-
ometer. This data was used to select the sampling nozzle diameter.
The approximate moisture content of the stack gas was determined
by the wet bulb and dry bulb thermometer technique.
The sampling traverse points were selected according to Method
1 of the Federal Register (Volume 36, Number 247, Part II, December
23, 1971.)
The stack emissions were sampled by using the following
sample train: a stainless steel nozzle; a glass-lined heated probe;
a millipore AA filter backed up by a Whatman 41 filter; two impingers
with 100 ml of distilled water; one dry impinger; one impinger with
approximately 180 grams of silica gel (the second impinger had a standard
tip, while the first, third and fourth impingers had modified tips
with 1/2-inch ID openings); a thermometer on the last impinger; a flexible
-------
1
x^x rpi
frOj
U | Li
v
?
2
i
(Li
:j
p
I
K\
1. Nozzle (stainless steel) §U I
2. Probe (Pyrex glass tubing inside stainless steel shaftj
3. Filter
3A. Temperature control chamber
4. Ice bath
5. Impinger with 100 ml distilled water
(modified tip)
6. Impinger with 100 ml distilled water
7. Impinger, dry (modified tip)
8. Impinger with silica gel
(modified tip)
9. Thermometer
10. Flexible sample line
11. Vacuum gauge
12. Main control valve
13. Air tight vacuum pump
14. By-pass control valve
15. Dry test meter
16. Calibrated orifice
17. Inclined manometer
18. "S" type pitot tube
FIGURE
BERYLLIUM SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
sample line; an air-tight pump; a dry test meter; and finally, a
calibrated orifice with an inclined manometer. Figure 4 shows a
schematic arrangement of the sampling train.
Because the stack gas temperatures were between 80°F and
130 F for all three sources, the filter and holder portion of the
sample train was not heated to 225°F.
Even though the ambient temperature was in the 30°F to ,60°F
range, the impingers were iced down the second day of testing so that
a minimum quantity of water would be evaporated in the impingers. The
ice bath remained around 38°F during the tests. 100 ml of distilled
water had to be added to each of the first two in all four trains
at the end of the first day at the Calciner and the Building #16 Rectangular
Stack. For all sources tested, the second impinger lost the greatest
quantity of water.
Each of the sources tested were sampled by two trains simul-
taneously, at the same traverse points: in a four point test, Train A
was sampling at Point 1, while Train B was sampling at Point 3; when
A moved to Point 2, B moved to 4; when A moved to 3, B moved to 1, etc.
For each stack sampled, both sampling trains assigned to that stack,
sampled at every traverse point to insure that identical, average samples
were obtained. The Calciner and the Rectangular Stack were sampled for
three days at about eight hours per day. At the end of each day the
probe was removed and plugged up as well as the remainder of the train.
High wind velocities and sub-freezing temperatures in the area made it
impossible to leave the sampling trains.exposed outside.
-------
The spray Dryer was sampled with two trains simultaneously
for approximately eight and one-half hours.
A grab sample was taken from the Rectangular Stack to be
analyzed for organic beryllium. The same sampling train was used as
in the other sources, but the sample was taken at only one point
and not isokinetically.
Sample Recovery
Samples were recovered in accord with procedures outlined
in Method 3 of the Federal Register (36 F.R. 23239, December 7, 1971)
concerning the Proposed EPA Regulations on National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Beryllium). The only exceptions to the
outlined method were the separation of impinger and probe washings
and an extensive preparation of sample blanks.
The sampling train glassware, exclusive of the glass lined
probe and the fritted disc filter, were soaked in chromic acid cleaning
solution for two hours previous to the preparation of sample blanks.
The probes were thoroughly washed in chromic acid solution prior to
testing but were not soaked due to their cumbersome length. All sam-
pling glassware was rinsed extensively with distilled-deionized (D.I.)
water following the acid wash.
Four sampling trains were assembled and charged with 200 mis
of D.I. water. A milipore AA plastic filter and a low ash Whatman fiber
filter was installed in each filter holder. Each train was then care-
fully disassembled. The filters were placed in containers, sealed, and
labeled "filter blank train # ." All glassware, including the probes,
was rinsed with D.I. water and acetone. The washings were added to a
-------
glass container with the 200 ml water charge for the corresponding sam-
pling train. These samples were labeled "Blank train #_." Samples of
D.I. water and of acetone were set aside and labeled.
Each sampling train was then reassembled and charged with 200
mis of D.I. water. Sampling trains were assigned to specific stacks and
were carried, sealed, to the sample site. After the completion of an
eight hour run, the probe was disconnected from the train and the impingers
and probe were sealed and removed from sources of Beryllium contamination.
An additional charge of 200 mis of water was added to each train at the end
of the first day's testing.
At the end of three days of sampling, a rigorous sample recovery
was performed. The chemist showered and donned a fresh set of uncon-
taminated clothes. No one was allowed to enter the sample recovery room
until all samples had been recovered. The perifery of all ground glass
joints was rinsed and wiped clean prior to disassembly to prevent con-
tamination in the sample transfer. The ground glass U tubes were successively
removed and rinsed with D.I. water and acetone. Care was taken to min-
imize contact of the sample with the cleaned outer surfaces of all glass-
ware. The impinger liquid was transferred to a clean graduated cylinder
to measure the quantity of charge remaining in the sample train. The
impingers and the graduate, with the exception of the silica gel impinger,
were carefully rinsed three times with D.I. water and acetone. No impingers
were opened during the washing process, to avoid possible sources of con-
tamination. The silica gel was quantitatively transferred to its original
container for subsequent weighing. After all impinger samples from all
four trains had been sealed, the probe washings were recovered. Each probe
-------
Each probe was thoroughly rinsed with D.I. water and acetone and a cotton
plug was pushed through the probe to remove any clinging particulate mat-
erial. All samples were then turned over to the Project Officer for
additional labeling and analysis.
-------
APPENDIX D
-------
MEMORANDUM
February 3, 1972
TO: John Dollar
FROM: John Koogler
Re: Be Sampling, Coors Porcelain
Tom and I tentatively identified four sources which might be tested;
three in the beryllium preparation building (all 9" diameter stacks),
and one in the beryllium pressing and machining building (a 3' x 5'
stack).
Beryllium Preparation
Spray Dryer. The beryllium is received as an oxide in powder
form. It is mixed with water and ground to achieve the desired par-
ticle size. The slurry is then sprayed into a dryer (a cyclone into
which hot air is injected) and the resulting powder is collected by
a high efficiency cyclone. The cyclone exhaust passes through a bag
filter and a HEPA filter. The exhaust from this filter is one of the
major sources to sample. Temperature is 70°F to 100°F. Stack is 9"
diameter, access to which is on the roof of a penthouse (equivalent
to about the 8th floor). There is presently one sampling port, 3"
diameter, about 18" above the roof. Tom cannot decide whether he will
want one or two probes in the stack. If he wants two, he will contact
Coors to place another port.
The problem with sampling is scheduling the grinding operation.
This will probably be tested the second week of the project. The
schedule will be confirmed the first week.
Sample box(es) will be on roof exposed to weather, but control
boxes can probably be placed in penthouse. Tom indicated an 8-hour
sample, but I think the actual duration will be dependent upon grinding
operation. (See Figure 1)
Area Exhaust System. The ground beryllium oxide which is collec-
ted in the cyclone following the spray dryer is transferred through a
-------
&0 11,0
n
/M
M
sfc
/
(
r
Wy
x.
O r
r
^
r«
| pcL^-fV
:--
-------
closed system to a blender where various additives are added. After
blending, the material is transferred into two liter plastic bottles
for transfer to the pressing and processing building. There is an ex-
haust system which is used to remove dust which may escape during the
transfer to the bottles. Also on this system is a glove box where they
crush beryllium oxide which has been recovered from scrap beryllium.
The scrap is burned in a kiln and the resulting oxide is crushed before
regrinding (same grinding and recovery as described earlier).
This entire system is exhausted through a HEPA filter. Stack dia-
meter is 9" and temperature is 70°F - 80°F. Flow is fairly low - 3/8"
to 1/2" nozzle. Access to the stack is from roof of the building (pent-
house floor level). The stack comes up the side of the building with
the port 18" above roof level. It would be difficult to get two probes
in this stack. Also, there is an obstruction (the penthouse wall) 6 ft
from the stack in-line with the port. This will limit the overall length
of the probe-sample box to 6 ft. Control box can be placed in penthouse.
The operation of this system depends upon the operation of the spray
dryer or the kiln. We talked of "seeding" the system for sampling pur-
poses. Number of probes and time schedule were not determined (see Figure
2).
Kiln Exhaust. The kiln described in the preceeding section is
exhausted through a HEPA filter. The exhaust stack is identical to that
for the area exhaust system and adjacent to it. Coors indicated they
would probably be using the kiln during the period we were testing, so
this system is a possibility. Number of probes and time schedule were
not established (see Figure 2).
Beryllium Processing
All operations in the beryllium processing building are in glove
boxes. All of these boxes are exhausted by a central system which has
a bank of HEPA filters. The exhaust is through a 3' x 5' stack which
runs up the outside of the building. Access to the section where sam-
ples will be taken is from the roof of the building. Processes in this
building operate continuously. Gas flow is fairly low (3/8" nozzle). A
24 hour sample - three 8-hour shifts, is scheduled. We tentatively
agreed that five sampling ports be placed across the 5 ft dimension of
the stack. Coors will build a platform for working. Two trains will
be used.
The umbilical cords can be run down to the ground (24 ft) through
a wall, and the control boxes placed inside. This source will be sam-
pled the first week (Figure 3).
-------
F.
-V
v^_
FT
IW
"~
,— ^ i- c
-$>> ;
(^AUrx^ s)
Q^ce cl
-------
w
/ f { ( r
h-ft f^hr
«3-
0/VAC.cTU
-------
Summary
You will need four trains plus spare parts and five people. Tom
wants one "clean" man to transfer samples in a "clean" location (pro-
bably the motel). Chadbourne will be good for this. In addition,
schedule for yourself, Allen, and Durgan. All probes need only be
four feet long. Get Whatman #41 paper for filter back-up. Call Tom
about our filter holders.
My suggestion for other details is to keep in touch with Tom for
the remainder of the week and find out from him what is decided upon.
JBK:kg
-------
APPENDIX E
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
EEInc
Name
John Koogler, Ph.D., P.E.
John Dollar, E.I.T., M.S.
John Chadbourne, M.S.
George Allen, Sr. Tech.
Robert Durgan, $r. Tech.
Eric Johnson, $r. Tech.
Title
Project Director
Project Manager
Chemist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
United States Government, EPA
Name
Thomas E. Ward
Joseph Peoples
Joseph DeSantis
Project Test Officer
Chemical Engineer
Chemical Engineer
Coors Porcelain Company
Name
Don Philips
Bill Rodgers
Engineering Superintendent
Safety Director
------- |