TEST NO. 72 - CI - 18
ROYSTER COMPANY
RUN OF PILE TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
MULBERRY, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 29 - MARCH 1, 1972
. n<:
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
TEST NO. 72 - CI - 18
ROYSTER COMPANY
RUN OF PILE TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
MULBERRY, FLORIDA
FEBRUARY 29 - MARCH 1, 1972
Test Conducted By:
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
Contract # 68-0.2-0232. -
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures iii
List of Tables iii
Introduction 1
Sumnary of Results 1
Process Description 8
Process Operation 8
Location of Sampling Points 9
Sampling and Analytical Procedures 14
Appendix
A., Emission Calculations and Results
B. Field Data
C. Standard Analytical Procedures
D. Project Participants •
ii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1. Flow Diagram and Sampling Locations 3
2. Port Location - Scrubber Inlet 10
3. Port Location - Mixing Cone 11
4. Port Location - North Stack 12
5. Port Location - South Stack 13
6. Moisture Sampling Train 17
7. Fluoride Sampling Train 18
LIST OF TABLES
1. Summary of Results - Scrubber Inlet 4
2. Summary of Results - Mixing Cone 5
3. Summary of Results - North Stack 6
4. Summary of Results - South Stack 7
lit
-------
INTRODUCTION
Under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental
Engineering, Inc. conducted emission tests at the Royster Company Triple Super-
phosphate plant in Mulberry, Florida. Three test runs were conducted on
February 29- March 1, 1972. The purpose of the tests was to obtain data for
the use of both the Industrial Studies Branch and the Performance Standards
Branch of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Measurements for total fluorides were made at the scrubber inlet duct and
at the two outlet stacks to the scrubber. The emissions from the mixing cone
were also measured. Grab samples of the scrubbing liquid, the process reactants,
and the process product were analyzed for fluoride and P205 content. A schema-
tic flow diagram of all sampling locations is given in Figure 1. Complete test
results are given in Appendix A.
SUMMARY'OF RESULTS
All process and scrubber operating conditions were normal during the three
test runs. No major sampling problems were encountered; the only irregularity
occurred at the scrubber inlet duct. Since entrained water was present at this
sample point, the percent stack gas moisture,was calculated using a psychrome-
tric chart.
For the third test run both the percent stack gas moisture and the fluoride
concentration for the North and the South outlet stacks are extremely low com-
pared to the other two test runs. No explanation is available for this anomolyV
v A summary of stack gas conditions, fluoride emission levels, and scrubber
-------
efficiencies for each test run are given in Tables 1 - 4.
\
-------
Stack Sample Location
Rock Acid
v
cone
V
Curing Den
Pond Water
V
Scrubbers
To Atmosphere
North
Stack
South
Stack
t t
|
To Pond
Storage
Figure 1
Schematic Flow Diagram
Royster Company
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
**
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P.t SCFM
Vol. dry gas P S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P20r Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton PpCt Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
2/29/72
30
29.62
3.2
77
105575
65.408
1600
1600.36
0.3767
0.3768
0.323
0.323
340.8
340.9
21.8
21.8
—
2
2/29/72
30
29.62
2.9
75
95245
60.21
1800
1801.5
0,4604
0.4608
0.385
0.3853
375.8
376.1
23.5
23.5
— .
3
3/1/72
30
29.62
2.9
74
136147
114.133
2100
2101
0.2834
0.2835
0.2523
0.2524
330.7
330.8
20.0
20.0
—
**
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
Saturated gas; % moisture calculated from psychrometric chart
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
MIXING CONE PICKUP
Run No. •
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P.*, SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total , Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P00r Fed.
£ 0
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P205 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
2/29/72
30,
30
0.1
90
246
51.169
46.8
405.8
0.0141
0.1221
0.0136 •
0.1178
0.0297
0.2579
0.0019
0.0165
2
2/29/72
30
30
1.5
90
239
48.482
61
408
0.0194
0.1296
0.0184
0.1233
0.0397
0.2654
0.0025
0.0166
3
3/1/72
30
30
2.2
80
292
61.457
11.1
778.1
0.0028
0.195
0.0027
0.1875
0.007
0.488
0.0004
0.0296
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
OUTLET NORTH
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate G> S.T.P.* SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour '
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton Pp05 Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P,>05 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
V
1
2/29/72
30
30
3
88
64741
95.346
34.4
34.46
0.0056
0.0056
0.0052
0.0052
3.08
3.09
0.197
0.198
98.5
2
2/29/72
30
30
2.8
89
65060
96.426
24.8
24.8
0.004
0.004
0.0037
0.0037
2.21
2.21
0.14
0.14
99.0
3
3/1/72
30
30
0.4
86
63591
94.688
6
6
0.001
0.001
0.0009
0.0009
0.53
0.53
0.03
0.03
99.8
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
OUTLET SOUTH
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P.* SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P^Og Fed.
Fluoride, total , Ib/ton P205 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
2/29/72
30
29.91
2.9
89
42317
71.375
24.5
24.59
0.0053
0.0053
0.005
0.005
1.9
1.9
0.12
0.12
—
2
2/29/72
30
29.91
3.1
90
40952
66.89
17.8
17.8
0.0041
0.0041
0.0038
0.0038
1.4
1.4
0.09
0.09
3
3/1/72
30
29.91
-0.2
87
43090
68.094
0.52
0.52
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.04
0.04
0.003
0.003
—
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
Process Description
ROP triple superphosphate is made by reacting 32-34 percent
PpOg rock with phosphoric acid in a TVA cone-type continuous mixer
to yield a product containing 46% P205. Tne principal reaction
is as follows:
Ca3(P04)2 + 4 H P04 + 3H20 —->• 3 Ca H4 (P04)2°H20
The cone discharges to a slowly moving belt called the "den"
on which the reactions continue until the slurry solidifies and is
discharged to the storage pile. The reactions go to near completion
in the pile where after sufficient curing the product is ready for
shipment.
Process Operation
Run #1 was conducted from 12:40 p.m. to 3:20 p.m. on
February 29, 1972. The second test was completed at 7:04 p.m. the
same day. Run #3 was carried out from 9:08 a.m. to 11:12 a.m. on
March 1. Process and scrubber conditions were normal throughout
the three tests.
8
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling sites and number of traverse points were
selected as per "Method I - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Sta-
tionary Sources, Part 60, Subchapter C, Chapter 1, Title 40," Federal
Register. No. 247-Pt. II-l.
The above method suggests using two perpendicular diameters
of traverse points per sampling station, however, on-site conditions
necessitated the use of only one traverse diameter in some cases. The
suggested number of traverse points per diameter was used where possible
without sampling within one inch of the inner wall.
Figures 2 through 5 are schematic diagrams of the stack con-
figurations near the sampling location, and the sampling points traversed
during the emission tests.
-------
LET
TRAVERSE:
POHMT NQ
i
2
3
4-
5"
G
7
8
9
10
ii
12.
13
!4-
15
1G
17
l&
DISTANCE"
FROM PORT
( INCHES)
( 5/3Z
3 25/32.
G 7/IG
9 3/Q
12- 9/1G
IG 5/3Z
^0 5"/l6
2.5 15/32
3 2- 27/3 2.
S3 5132.
GO 9/16
65^ 23/32
G9 27/3Z
"73 7/IG
76 sye
79 9/16
62 7/32.
84- I3/I€»
n
86" I.D
FIGURE 2
10
A-A'
-------
1X1NG CONE PICK-UP
TRAVERSE:
POINT NO.
i
Z
<3
4-
Di STANCE
FROM PORT
( INCHES)
1/4
f 3/4"
4 1/8"
5"
6» '
Not sampled - too close
'to stack wall
A'-A'
FIGURE 3
11
-------
OUTLET NORTH
A'
A'
60'
\
TRAVERSE
POINT NCX
t*
2
3
4-
iD
G
7
8
9
IO
ii
12.
13
14-
15
16
DISTAIMCE"
i=RGiVl PORT
CINCHES)
I 5/3Z
3 17/32
G 1/8
9
12. 5T/3Z
15" 2T/3Z
20 3/&
2T
4-5
Si 5V©
5& 5-/3Z.
F9 27/32
Gl 1/2.
OS 7/8
Ge I5/3Z
~10 2.7/32.
Not sampled
PORT 2.
7Z" I.Q
BLOWER
PORT
A'- Ax
FIGURE 4
12
-------
OUTLET _ SOUTH
A'
A'
CO'
N
\
TRAVERSE
POINT NO
*
I
2,
3
4-
5"
G
7
8
9
»O
11
12.
13
11-
IG
DISTANCE-
FP\OM PORT
I 6V3Z
3 I7/3Z
G t/8
9
1 2. 573Z
IS" 27/3Z
ZO 3/&
27
4-S
s"t 4>ve
5G 573Z
5*9 Z7/32
Gl I/2.
C>5 7/8
TO 27 /3Z
Not sampled
PORT 2.
7Z" J.D.
BLOWER
PORT i
FIGURE 5
13
A-A"
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Preliminary Moisture Determination
The preliminary moisture content of the stack gases at each
sampling site was determined by Method 4 of the Federal Register
(Volume 36, Number 247, Part II, December 23, 1971).
The only significant difference between F.R. Method 4 and
the method used was the configuration of the sampling train (see
Figure 6 ).- The sampling train used in these tests consisted of the
first two midget impingers with 5 grams of distilled-deionized water
followed by two dry midget impingers in place of a silica gel cartridge.
At sampling sites where liquid entrainment was a problem, the
preliminary and final moisture contents were determined from wet and
dry bulb thermometry. See Appendix B for the data used in determining
the preliminary moisture content of the stack gases.
After completing the moisture run, the total impinger liquid
plus water rinsings of the probe tip thorough the fourth impinger were
placed in an 8 ounce polyethylene container. The samples were held by
EPA personnel for further analyses.
B. Preliminary Velocity Determination
Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register was used as
a guide in determining the preliminary stack gas velocity for each source
tested. The major difference was that only the maximum and minimum
*
Scrubber Inlet
14
-------
velocity heads across each stack area were determined so that a proper
nozzle size could be selected. During each of the three fluoride
emission tests, velocity head readings were taken at points selected
by using Method 1 of the Federal Register.
Stack pressure and temperature measurements were also made
during the preliminary velocity determinations.
C. Sampling for Fluoride Emissions
The sampling procedure used for determining fluoride emissions
was similar to Method 5 of the Federal Register. The major difference
between the two methods was the configuration of the sampling train.
The sampling train described in the Federal Register has a heated box
containing the filter holder directly following the glass probe. The
sampling train used in these tests contained no heated box and the filter
holder was placed between the third and fourth impingers (between dry
impinger and silica gel impinger) to prevent sample carry-over. Figure '..
7 is a schematic diagram of the sampling train used.
After the selection of the sampling site and the minimum number
of sampling points per Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register,
three separate test runs were performed. For each run, the required
stack and sampling parameters were recorded on field data sheets. They
are .included in Appendix B. Readings were taken at each traverse point
at least every five minutes, and when significant changes in stack para-
meters necessitated additional adjustments to maintain an isokinetic flow
rate. Nomographs were used to aid in the rapid adjustment of the sampling
15
-------
rate. The traverse points were selected to maintain at least one inch
from the inner stack wall. .
After each run, the liquid volume in the first three impingers
was measured volumetrically and the silica gel was reweighed. The im-
pinger liquid, the filter, plus the water washings of the probe and other
sampling train components up to the silica gel were placed into poly-
ethylene containers.
D. Liquid and Product Grab Samples
Periodically, during each test run, grab samples of the raw
materials, finished product, and scrubber liquid were taken, and the
temperature and pH were determined at the site. On some occasions,
the samples were split with the plant personnel so that comparative
analyses could be performed.
E. Laboratory Analysis Procedures
Water soluble fluorides were done by a sulfuric acid distilla-
tion followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD. Water insoluble
fluorides were first fused with NaOH followed by a sulfuric acid distilla-
tion then by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD.
?2^>^ analysis of the stack effluent was done by EPA personnel.
All other PpOj. analyses were done by plant personnel.
For more details of exact method used, see Appendix C.
\
16
-------
1. Heated Glass Probe
2. Glass Connector
3. Ice Bath
4. Midget Impinger With
5. Midget Impinger With
6. Midget Impinger, Dry
7. Midget Impinger, Dry
3. Flexible Sample Line
9. Vacuum Gauge
10. Main Control Valve
_!!. By-Pass Control Valve
!12. Air Tight Vacuum Pump
13. Dry Test Meter
.14. Thermometer
15. ' Calibrated Orifice
16. Inclined Manometer
17. S-Type Pitot Tube
Figure ''6
MOISTURE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
s.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Stainless Steel Nozzle
Heated Glass Probe
Glass Connector
Irnpinger,with 100 ml' H»0 (Modified Tip)
Irnpinger with 100 ml H^O (Standard Tip)
Impinger, Dry (Modified Tip) '
Impinger with 180 grams Silica Gel (Modified Tip)
Filter Holder with No. 1 Whatman Filter
Flexible Sample Line
vacuum Gauge
Main Control Valve
By-Pass Control Valve
Air Tight Vacuum Pump
Dry Test Meter
Calibrated Orifice
Inclined
nometer
S-Type Pi tot Tube
3
=a$%
10
T"
;»U.
i|U-
•a
ciM' (\W
1
1 1
j i
| (
:i
T" '
, '
i *
- 1
i !
i
i
»
S!
i '-T •-
i! tl-
J ^
• 7
8
— ^
-/-]
;!
i »•
i "'I
._]
11
<~ntj>*—'
13
O
-^M-
IXM
©
I n
it
Figure 7
FLUORIDE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
APPENDIX
-------
APPENDIX A
Emission Calculations & Results
-------
E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE SHEET
PB - Barometric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
As - Stack area, sq. ft.
AS'- Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. ft.
NPTS - Number of traverse points where the pitot velocity head was greater than zei
TS - Stack temperature, °R
TM - Meter temperature, °R
II - Average square root of velocity head, Vinches
. AJH - Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches H20
AN - Sampling nozzle area, square feet
CP - S-type pitot tube correction factor
VM - Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
VC - Condensate and silica gel increase in impringers, milliliters
Po - Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, [PB +A H~) inches Hg
L -13.6J
STP - Standard conditions, dry, 70°F, 29.92 inches Hg
Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Moisture fraction of stack gas -
Dry gas fraction
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (dry conditions)
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (stack conditions)
Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to.air
Excess air, %
Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
Stack gas velocity, feet per minute
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (stack conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (dry conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (STP)
Percent isokinetic volume sampled (method described in Federal Register)
Total Sample Time (minutes) "
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
VWV = (0.0474) x (VC)
VSTPD = (17.71 x (VM) x (PB + AIL. )-^ TM
13.6
VT = (VWV) + (VSTPD)
W = (VWV)-j-(VT)
FDA = (1.0) - (W) ,
FMOIST = Assumed moisture fraction
MD = (0.44 x % C0£) + (0.32 x % 02) + (0.28 x % N2) + (0.28 x % CO)
MS = (MD x FDA) + (18 x W)
GS = (MS)-j- (28.99)
. EA = [(100) x (% 02 - ^j^-i-fjo. 266.x % NZ) - (% 02 - %.,CO) ~]
U= (174) x (CP) x (H) x V(TS x 29.92)-v-(GS x PS)
; QS = (u) x (AS)
QD = (QS) x (FDA)
QSTPD = (QD) x ( 53°) x (i8-)
29.92 TS
PISO = (o.oo267 x VC x TS) + (PQ x TS x VM-^-TM) -~ (Time x 2 x PS x
Fluoride Emissions: -
MG = Milligrams of fluoride from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG)~ VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF) -7- (TS)
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD),
\ P2°5 Fed = Tons/hour, determined from plant data
Lbs/ton P205 Fed = (Ibs/hour) -^ (Tons/hour ,P2°5 Fed)
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
r-n nr> n n 71 P <-' c1 n / i 28.J50
1 °-98
10 815
1 77
J_ 1 8 W8 8 Q
10 83
J. 29 . G2
1 2767.1
J_ 40. 34
J_ 40.34
1 105575
.J_ 126
J_ 0.25
1 58.3
j_TSlfd".TG
J_ 0.37 67-
J_ 0 . 3 7 G 8
\TrM- — -
| 34078
|~3?() . 9'
i
-L _
i"^T 55 —
^X . o
1 2 1 __3.._ _ 1
1 2Z22./.7-0 1 2L/JL/_7_2_ 1
I_lli-S.a L OJLi-SJi 1
1_30 _ _ i__30 1
1 G 2 _Za.R 1 115 ^3_2 5 1
1 R ^ «.4 1 7 1_ 2 |
l_§.Q.t.21. 1_ 114 J.3_3 _J
1-10^37 1 _JULJ7JL J
J. 10 J. 2_^9 j
i _„_ i __ ^
1 1
1 1
1 1 j
1 ° 1 °
j[ 2 8 . 8 5 _[ 2 3_, 8 5
l^j>.5_4_ 1 _2£L54
ll'j.iS- 1 JL32
10.732 1 0.031
J_ 7 4 . 8 _[ 7 4
_! ' 1 G . 9 2 0 J_ 19.207
J_ 0 . 8 3 . J_ 0 . t; 3
J_29.G2 _| 29. G 2
1 24_7_8_,5_ i _1532^5_
J_ 40 . 34 _]_ 40.34
J_ 40 . 34 J_ 4~0 .34
J. 95245 1 _13.614_7_
J_ 12G J_ 120
J_0.25 ^"D."2b
_[59.5 J_ 78.9
\-rmn~-5 — -]-2T^— —
j^ti ."4 b 0 4 . j^ "O.^IJ^
|1T."I|-T)"015 j_ u.^Tl'S1?
i "0 ."5 u~B~3 i "0 . "2'5"2"TT
_[375.8 _[ 330.7
J_376.1 J_ 330. a
1 1
_[23.5 Ji 20.0
J[23.5 J[ 20.0 -
**$S
.P.*~>-DRY, 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES MERCURY***
Saturated gas; % moisture figured from psychrometric chart, not from volume
of water collected.
-------
IQURCE TEST VATA
TEST no -
PLANT - ROYSTER POP
SOURCE - MIXING CONE
TYPE OF PLANT -
COUTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED -
NO ' OF
BARTOW, FLA.
PICKUP
RUNS -
1)RUN NUMBER
2) DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
UPTIME- END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
S)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IK H20
1)VOL DRY GAS, METER COND, CUBIC FEET
8) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEG F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
- 10) TOTAL 1110 COLLECTED, ML
11)VOL U20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU FL
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H)PERCENT C02 .
1S)PERCENT 02
16) PERCENT CO
17) PER CENT N2 '
1B)PERCENT EXCESS AIR
13)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CON!
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY •
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN U20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE , DEG F -
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD)
2 5) PI TOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2b)STACK PRESSURE, IN HG, ABSOLUTE
27)5 TA CK GAS VEL , STA CK COND, F.P.M.
28)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
23)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30)STA CK GAS FLOW RA TE , S.T.P. , S CFMD
31) NET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SA!-!PLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
33) PERCENT ISOKINETIC
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, . MG
3&) FLUOR IDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
37)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3B)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
3<3)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, CR/CF, STK CND.
HO)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, .LB/UOUR
HDFLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/UOUR
H3)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., LB /TON P20l> FED
HH)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/TON P20b FED
i _ i .
L-ZLZZLl
I 15i.l2.
i 30
J_ 0^5
J. 52 177
i 82^6
J_ 5 1 ,JL 6 9
1 0. 6
M 0.03
1 O*-1
i 2
i
1
i
i
| 28.85
; 1 28.84
J_ 0. 99
J_ 0. 4
1 90
]_ 9. 373
_! 0.83.
J_ 30
1 1355.3
J_ 0. 19
(0.19
1 246
1 12°
J_ 0.~25
I ~9~5~. G
["^TT.I]
|Troir."^
jl"D~."DlTiT
iTT.T2^"l
'\ tf~. W ^
|"U~.T1TB"
i TT."D"2T; /
i T) ,T5 yTi
i ^1T1.
it) .THIS ^
1 _a
•2— J-J/-2.9-A7.3.-
1 -> 8- • U-0-
1 ^a
i a U.K
_L !l° f'1 3.
1 a.6._6
1 U.8. US.2.
1 1 5. 5.
1 Q. T-^
1 1 5.
1 2. —
__ 1 _- _ _
_[
1 _
J
1 o_
i ™28r_.Ji.Ii-
1 _2.8_ QJL
1 0_^_9_
1 Q.J2J' "•
J. 9_Q_
1 9 1 1 'i
1 0 «JL3
1 _3_0__ _ _
J. 1 3 2 1 U
1 0.19
1 Q_,- 1 9
J_ 239
1 12°
J_ 0.25
1 94.2
1 61
1 ^ ° 8
J_ 0.01 94
_[ 0 . 1 2 9 G
J_ 0. 018.4
J_ 0.1233
J_ 0 . 0397
J_ 0 . 2G.54
_[
J_ 0.0025
J_ 0 . 0 1 6 G
1 ^ .
L Ul • OJL
1 _an.
i 6,1 it°u
1 71^,7
1 61 iiRj
1 2 9 u
1 -L.J59
I 2 °
1 -2 _
1 _
1 _ _
1
1 _c _
1 2 8_, 8 5
_[ 23_, 51
1 0_, 9 n
1 0_,U73
J. 80
J_ 1 1^ 0 0 3
1 °_i 83
1 30
J_ 1597. I.L
1 o.1^
J_ 0.19
_[ 292
1 12°
J_ 0 . 2 5
1 "7 • 7
_[ 11.1
J_ 7 7 8 . 1
J_ 0.0028
_[ 0.1 0 5
J 0.002 7
1 . -L <• -' -^
j_ 0 . 0 0 7
j_ o./ion
j_
i 0.000';.
J_ 0" . 0 2 D R
-
***S.r.P.4~*Dliy, 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES MERCURY***
-------
SOURCE TEST DATA
TEST NO - HO OF RUUS -
PLANT - ROYSTER ROP ' BART Oil, FLA,
SOURCE - OUTLET NORTH
TYPE OF PLM1T - .
C011TROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED -
DltUil NUMBER . 1 .1 L .2 1 1 1
2) DATE . •' l__2/2a/2.2.-.l 2/,2.2./.7_Z_l iZ.LZ.L2. 1
3)TIME BEGAi; ' ' i 12-^U.Q. L lli-Hil. 1 Q-L-Q-Q 1
H)TIME El-ID . 1 I£i2a_ L laiO-ii.- L_1.1.LL2_ [
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, III HG i 2Q 1 ad 1 3.0. J.
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, III H2° 1 2.^0.2. 1 2,^.0.2. i Li_lQ 1
1)VOL DRY CAS, METER COI1D, CUBIC FEET J. 2.2. ,1.2.3. 1 ^2.^15.0. L i.!i_51JL 1
K) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F J. a5...5. i__9Q.^9 1__?JLJL 1
<3)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET J. a5.^au.a 1 2.6.JL2JL i !1-JL.8JL 1
10)TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, l',L J. Q.ZU-. I 5.8...S. J.__'L-JL_ 1
11) VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU FTJ. 2__ai_ 1 2.JLL J. °--J^L 1
'•12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME J.__a J. 2_,_Q.__ J. O.J| J.
13)ASSUf!SD STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL J. £._fl 1 2.JJ. i__2_._5 i
!H)PERCEiJT C02 1 1 . 1 . 1
1S)PVRCEI}T 02 1 L 1 1
lb)PERCE!JT CO 1 1 1 1
IDPEHCEUT N2 1 _. 1 1 '
1Q)PERCEHT EXCESS AIR i 0. 1 Q. 1
1S)MOLEC'ULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY 1 2_8._8JL J.__?JL_QJL- 1__2_8_-JLL i
2Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COI!L\[ 2_8._5.3. J.__2_8AJ5JL l__2JL--°J-_ i
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1 Q.^.98. 1 Q_JH3_ 1__°_'_9JL_. 1
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), III H20 1 Q.^.TJLS. 1 Q--_7J_8_ i__°_-_C_°_9_ J
23)AVb'KAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F 1__8_8_ JLJL8_-_7_ l_JLG_-_2 __.i
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD) l^JLSLJJL l.-AJLJl2.. l_J_LrJHL__J
2S)PITO? CORRECTION FACTOR JL.JLJL3. J._JL-JL3-. 1__0_-JSJ J
2&)STACK PRESSURE, III HG , ABSOLUTE 1__3P 1__3_° 1__3_°__:
27)STAOK GAS VEL, STACK COI.'D, F.P.lf. 1 JLl3-4 1 JJLHJL'J l__2_3_2^_-_2
28)STACZ AREA, SQ FEET . ' . 1__2JL-_2J_ l__2JL-_2_7_ 1_^2_8JJ;J
2V)EPFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET 1__2JL-JL7_ 1__2JL'_2_7_ 1
3Q)STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD L___5_!t7JL1 1__GA.0_G_°_ 1
31)NET TIME OF TEST, MIIU1TES . l_J-_2_° 1_J_2_0 •^—rr-^r
32)SAt-:PLi;iG KOZZLE DIAMETER, III CUES l__°_-_2_5__ !__?•"_ -i--?-A-^-
33)PERCENT ISOKIUETIC l-J-JL1---8 J-^-r-J __!_.;„-:-
_!,
)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG 1__3J_'JL __i_ ^HJ b I."0"
35) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG . l_jll:_.L 1_4-*TT J—TV-TTI
36)FLUORIDil. - WATER'SOLUBLEt GR/SCF i.JL'-0-0-5.0- l_ij^.?_ l_^_l^i«___.
3'DFLUOiUDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF i_£
3i\)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD. i__°.
3Q)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD. 1_ °.
ilO)FLUOHIDZ - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/UOUR i.^J^^ 1_.
H1)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, . LB/UOUR 1_"3.
H3)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., LB/TOil P20l>
'4 M ) FL UORI i)E - TOTA L , LB / TO// P2 0 5
'.T.P.++DRY, 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 IVCUES MERCURY***
-------
SOURCE TEXT
TEST 110 -
PLANT - ROYSTER ROP
SOURCE - OUTLET SOUTH
TYPE OF PLANT -
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED -
no OF nutfo
x -
BARTOWt FLA.
DRUil NUMBER
2) DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
UPTIME END , . -
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, 177 HG
§)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20
7) VOL DRY CAS, METER COUD, CUBIC FEET
B) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
• 9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
lO) TOTAL 1110 COLLECTED, ML
1D1/OL L'20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASS mi ED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
mn-ERCENT CO 2
- \5) PERCENT 02 . .
1C )PERCENT CO
1 7 )PER CE'l T 111
1B)PL'XCEUT EXCESS AIR
\$)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CO
21) STACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), III H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
•2^)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TE'dpy-VEL HEAD)
2 b) PI TOT CORRECTION FACTOR ,
2^) STACK PRESSURE, IN JIG, ABSOLUTE
2DSTACK GAS VEL, STACK COUD, F.P.M.
.28)STACK AREA, SQ FEET .
23)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30) STAC K GAS FLOW RATE,, S.T.P. , SCFMD
3l)i1ET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SAi-:PLIl]G NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES •
33) PER C EH T ISOKIUETIC
3 4 ) FL UORIDE - WA TER SOLUBLE , I-1G
3 5 ) FL UORI D E - TO TAL, MG
3&)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SGF
3rJ)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, . GR/SCF
3Q)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD
31)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD
HO)FLUOHIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
m)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
H3)FLUORIDE -WATER SOL., LB/TON P2(7I> FE
H^)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/TON P205 FE
i !„ 1 _2 1_ 3. „_ i
1 !9'iiH 1 1£ • r£ i ° • Q.Q. 1
i 1i'2fi. 1 1^'J2JQ • 1 •LL--L2. •
i 30 - J. 30 1 3JL !
1 Q.,.9 1 1 u^^^ 1 a a.0. 1
1 7 3^4 Q.9 1 69^.122. 1 G.8. 5.GJL 1
|863 ip9L|- • 1 "Lu 3_ ' '
171375 J.66£° lrs_ 014 '
i '^5*.5 1 45 1 2. 3. '
FT\ 216 J. 2*.12. 1 G-^JLL J.
log J. .3. -1 1 d^P i
12,_9 129 1 ° 2. !
1 _ 1 _ 1 _ 1
1 1 ___ __ 1 _ _ 1
1 1 _ _ 1 _ !
1 „ J. _1 :
lo lo 1 o_ i
1 28,_85 _ 1 28 ^85, 1 28 ^ J
77ZJ1 28.53 1 28.51 J.28 OJL J
10.98 10.98 1 Q_^_9_9
J_ 0 . 4 6 8 1 0 . H 5 4 1 O^J-h o_5
j_ 8-8 . 7 J_ 89 ^5 1 80 5
J_10.9G8 1 10. 6H5 110,879
10.83 10.83 1 0_, 8 3
J_29.91 1 2 9 ^9 1 1 2 9_, 9 1
I-ICQP. O l"1s^n Q 1 *1 C *7 1 • "7
| JL O r? O ^ J 1 .u O O v* « O i J_ D / H- . /
J_ 28. 27 _[ 28.27 128.27
J_ 2 8 . 2 7 J[28.27 128.27
142317 140952 143090
1 120 J_ 120 1120
|0.25 . J_0.25 10.25
j_116.G _[112.9 1109.2
1 24 . 5 j_ 1 7 . 8 1 0 .~52
j^ 24. 59 j_ 17 . 8 _[ 0. 52
j^l) ,~0~b~5 3 J_ 0 . 0 0 4 1 10.0001
i"D.0053 J| 0.0041 _[0."0001
J[~0.005 . J_ 0.0.0 3 Pi _[ 0.0 001
j^T).T)l)5 J_ 0.00 30 _[0."0001
1 1 1 -
p i "D .l"2^Ti i 0.. 0 8 9 9 J_ 0 . 0 0 2 G
D l"0."^"2"5^ jTT.trBgg _[0.002G
***S.'f.P.*~+DXy, 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES VERCUR Y* +
-------
SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
\
-------
107058
4.99
Scrubber
Inlet
Flow: 105575(DSCFM)
Fluorides: 340«9 (#/hr)
From Pond
Scrubber
Efficiency:98.5%
y
To Pond
64741
3.09
To
Atmosphere
North
Stack
42317
1.9
South
Stack
Royster Company
Triple Super Phosphate
Run 1
-------
Scrubber
Inlet
Flow: 95245 (DSCFM)
Fluoride: 376.1 (#/hr)
From Pond
V
Scrubber
Efficiency:99.0%
To Pond
65060
2.21
106012
3.61
To
Atmosphere
A
North
Stack
40952
1.4
South
Stack
Royster Company
Triple Super Phosphate
Run 2
-------
Scrubber
Inlet
Flow:136147(DSCFM)
Fluorides:330.8 (#/hr)
106681
0.57
From
N
Pond
/
I
63591
0.53
• Scrubber
Efficiency: 99. 8%
\
To P
/
ond
To
^ Atmosphere }
North
Stack
J
*
s
South
Stack
/
v •
43090
0,04
Royster Company
Triple Super Phosphate
Run 3
-------
APPENDIX B
Field Data
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE DETERMINATION
-------
PRELIMIMARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
V
' Plant fxOW-'S** r i I © Pt %s ; S1W&%@ Stack ^*,/$f&f
*ai
Date ^/Sf /*?^ Sample Time / O 2_^f Barometric Pressure
T ~\
? •'• •' "Hi
Moisture Content -- Method 1 .->
0^
, & O &
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading ^ ' '3 1 ,, "7 ^ f~~'
/~>7' (7 r**"
{#J & -3
Average Meter Temperature / ^
Average Meter Vacuum ^&^f~r^~^~m
Average Meter. Orifice AK £-\ ~c,<^>
Sampling Rate ' ™~
Barometric Pressure ® Meter Orifice 7 *- '\ "' ""•'
Dry Gas Volume Sampled § 70 °F, 29.92 "Kg
Condensate Volume
Water Vapor Volume 3 70°?; 29,92 "Hg
Moisture Fraction, HoO &'02r~i ^ Fraction Of Dry 'Air. FDA
Ft3
Ft3
Ft3
OF
«W«r
"H-,0
LPM
„„.,
Ft 3^
ml
Ft3
• Moisture.. Content — Xqthcd 2 .
Dry Bulb Te.np. _ IF Wet Eulb Temp. °F Dew Point Temp.
Vapor Pressure Of .K20 5 DP • "Hg Stack Pressure?6" ^.^ "Hg
Moisture Fraction, HgO . _ ___ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
Specific Gravity
\
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = J0.^4(^C02;] +J0.32(^02i[ -*-.[o.28(;6
N2 +
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = [CMd-)x(FDA)] + ^i8)x(K2Co] =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -7- (28.99) = _
-------
AA/ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA ^
Sr-ecj.f ic ..firavity
Dry Molecular 'height, Md = ^.^(^002^] +E.32(^02)j +-|0.28(;Si-I2 + CO)] =
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = [(Md)x(FDA)] + [?lS)x(H2ol] =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -f- (28.99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE COOTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant ReJ^'O- 1^%. Mg-a «, Stack
Date .iS/ISf /?"&> Sample Time Barometric Pressure ' ' "He
Moisture Content — Method 1
f
Final Dry Test Meter Reading -•' ' ''
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading ^ .&&. & 'O
^-")
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled__ & ' O
Average Meter Temperature / -^ '
Average Meter Vacuum ~r
Averae Meter Orifice A K &&£>&
Sampling Rate | LFM
Barometric Pressure '3 Meter Orifice >!•?0 "Hg
Dry Gas Volume Sampled 3 ?0 °F, 29.92 "Kg ^, 9 "7 __Ft3
Condensate Volume ^ ' O, c; y>J • pi
V/ater Vapor Volume '§ ?0 °F, 29,92 "Hg ?t3
Moisture Fraction, H20 Fraction "Of Dry Air, FDA
Moisture Content. — "nthcd 2
Dry Bulb Temp. ^£> "F Wet Bulb Temp. ^.F Dew Point Temp. °_?
Vapor Pressure Of II20 ^ DP "Hg Stack Pressure "Hg
Moisture Fraction. KpO &' ® & Fraction Of "Dry Air, FDA 0 ^ •i
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular V/eight, M^ = J0.^4(^C02)| + [0.32(^Og)] +-}o.28(>oM2 + C0)| =
Molecular V/eight @ Stack Conditions, Ms = [(Md)x(FDA)] -4- ^1S)x(H202]
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -f- (28.99) = _________
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant Pu«j-Q- ^fe Wq .'S7M»re. stack j>ure.f,r"
Date £80y»- Sample Time ffatf j* IriSl* Barometric Pressure 2^, ?Z- "Hg
(|«II»IH^^^«^""™"""»^"«™™^^»^™^ ™ «*^B»««W » J 1 "I II I «l^ MtJIJ «JIIIJ
Moisture Content -- Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading^ _ 3 4-4-,C> 0 / Ft3
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading _ ; _ 342 . ^tf? Ft3
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled__ _ ; _ /• 6 ^ ^ _ Ft3
Average Keter Teiaperature ' . _
Average Meter Vacuum _ •_ _ •
Average Meter. Orifice AH _ .,, £)
Sampling Rate _ . _
Barometric Pressure @ Meter Orifice
Dry Gas Volume Sampled § ?0 °F, 29.92 "Hg _ . _ Ft
•
Condensate Volume _ . _ ; _ • _ pj.
V7ater Vapor Volume % ?0 °F, 29,92 "Hg _ _ Ft
Moisture Fraction, H20 _ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
. Moisture,,Content _-- Method 2 . . .
Dry Bulb Temp. . °F Wet Bulb Temp, _^F Dew Point Temp. ;._ °F
Vapor Pressure Of H20 3 DP "Hg Stack Pressure 7^- 9 "u~
Moisture Fraction, H20 Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA_
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = ^.^(^C023j +^.32(^022J +'^.28C^N2 + Co]] = _
Molecular Weight' 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = [(Md jx(FDA)] + -[TlB)x(H2Cl)] =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Ms) -f (28.99). =
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
\
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date
Run No,
s
Time Start j 2.*? I Time End_
Sampling Time/Point '/ >y>Gas Density F act or_
Barometric Press29.9il'Hg, Stack
Weather
, W/D'
,w/s
Le Box No. ^f Meter Box No._
Meter AH@ Pitot Corr. Factor •
Nozzle Dia. .25*in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
£t
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area O /. $~
itial Gas Meter Reading
'
. T .
lotal Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No
Orsat: C02
02 _____
CO
N2
Excess
Air .
Filter No.78fl«ft,?j
Test Conducted by:
A« L*
-- 7./7
Remarks:
#
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
^from End
'of Port
(irrr)"
.35"
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading .
(ft3)
933.,
• Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H2OJ
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.t? Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
Sample
Box
Temp.
In
Out
Last
Impiiger
Test '
Vacuuriij
on
Sampl
Train
("Hg)
Qjo.
O,l o
3^,
^40,
L3£
7?
22L
II
0*10
2L
5"
5
~£
I- 40
)3_/_4
957,. /
<9-^
0.64
7?
0.60
93
7
1.0*
6
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of, Port
ft
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
C"H20)
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp .@ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
ra
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
133-7
o,
a 79
a
L
II
S.io
LSJZL
7,20
0,10
0,1
/'
/,
2/
. -ft.
loo
_ZZ
77
loo
2JL
}QQ
loj_
7
«Kn I
3 1
«^
"h^
I c#
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date ^
Run No,
Time Start
Time End
Sampling Time/Point
°F, WB
DB
F, VF @ DP
'Hg
Mcisture^^TJ, FDA
Barometric.
Weather
,Gas Density Fact or
g, Stack
ample Box No,__Tl___Meter Box No. £
/ ^JO ff • ,*— jrf»*
Meter
Nozzle
Corr. Factor
in. , Probe Length
«_ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area_ --j^i
Height ~~
in
Tt2
ft
/
,-,/'
2±
H
&$.
JLL
13.7
0,30
7S-
33L
QJtL
75-
70
2.0,5
75-
JLSL
7
0,75
0.7S
75"
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
£
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
JL
17.
/V#i
6,9?
JtZ*.
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc, | Actual
'M^g&jL
0.70
o.iz
Stack Gas
Temp.
£>.^7
75"
7C
Gas Sample
Temp.@Diy
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
•7S-
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
TO'
2*
-H
6$
6
./^}
Z'5J
—1
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Mat'l Processing Rate
Sampling Location jjjLH'T
Date "3 -t- 72 Run No, ?
Time Start Q "%?> ^ Time End 1 ( O ~Z_
Sampling Time/Point 7w~U, /£•/• ( \2& u-CvO
DB °F.
WB °F, VF /DP , £7S~£> "Hg
Moisture2/?Z%,FDA.?7 ,Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press2?,VHg,
Weather CC^^> te.
Stack Prc
sss2fc*£'Hg
Temp. 75- °F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No, ^ Meter Box No. f
Meter MI@f,7«? Pitot Cor
Nozzle Dia.
r. Factor
, %3
, ? Tin. , Probe Length $T ft
Probe Heater Setting • ^%&
Stack Dimensions: Inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
1
2L
^f^
£f
£~
6
7
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Diameter 1i>?/#
0^17
ofoy-
€>^3/
p$$$
OW?
OM.,.,7^
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
7O. *&
•757*7
$ /• S~
$23
^J3 tf
*$&¥
/o&l
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
0.70
O*6O
Oi&O
Q.bt>
&>kJ
o.fee*
0&$
Final Gas Meter Reading / '?'¥ ,,%••& £> ft3
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
2,9
2.%
2/36
2,3&
2.7&
_2jfc
2.?^
Actual
2-S'
£ * J* O
"i? ? /-»
2,36
2,70
2.3fe>
1>7t>
Lsiitial Gas
T3€'"'itd * *
Total Condei
Moisture in
Silica Gel
Orsat: C02
r °2-
co
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conduc
Remarks : T
c&imv
Meter Reading £J. S SO ft3
is ate in Impingers tL 3 *5 ml
Silica Gel
Container No
/2-*2- gm
&(<% Filter No ."22O$
ted by: /$ .^ , LO t L So<«J
UA)^
Stack Gas
Temp .
7*
7«<
7?
?y
itj
(< , >^t A-^cjift.*—
4 &]£[&£. QftP F/irtO
fitrZ/UG 33s£ift&
Gas Sample
Temp . @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
•70
7?
7&
7&
76
7f
Out
6&
&*7
4^9
7^
-71
7^.
73
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°FJ
^-—
—
—
— -
~-
-
Last
Impirger
Test
9^
7f
7^
7^
7
-------
'Port and
jTraverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
•TO
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box •
Temp,
Last
Iinpinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
Plant
Sampling Location/^^(j^ CM.Z. 6
Date 2.**- 2^\~"? £-»Run No. /
-fV'IF T-NT/" TIG I 1INC. T«V
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Time Start /£ ,'^£>T.ime End^
Sampling Time/Point
DBJ?|T_0F, WB
Moisture!?! Q%, FDA
Barometric Press^/^"Hg, Stack Press^Q "Hg
V»:eatiier /A3£tl>t£ $ L.l>&t
Te;np. ^-~CF, W/D — ,W/S —*•
Sample Box No. ^»» Meter Box No. ^f
Meter AH3 J,£zPitot Corr. Factor_ ^
Nozzle Dia. /y in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting **~>&?
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Final Gas Meter Reading
ft5
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers_
Moisture in Silica G
*?&>
gm
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C02
02
CO
Filter Ko.
N2._
Excess
Test Conducted by:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
W*
-if--— <
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Mead
•("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
Actual
Temp .
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
Out
Temp.
Test
Sample
Train
("Hg)
3o.
29-
M
SfSt
6,
3
0
gt)
1 Cfo
3$
S3
'O
:?:
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No. .
tyi&^lS
k
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
&l
*_/
/
J4f*
f " " -"-
,
Clock
Time
•*9 » £'•*/?
^_-£*>.b /,
3* / 2*
.. f &\
eaasf
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
J6$?>i
' loy$.e&
f • • * *
ma*-
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
O*% *5
*> &>£»*•.
f***) e*% «d£
Va*''/ i&^*^
•
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Gale.
o>7f
*'7t
Actual
"""ii
C^S' rf ^ g
"**5 |
CU^S"S-.V
Stack Gas
Temp .
(°F)
§0
a-
. I^w^o^H^
Gas Sample
Temp .8 Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
?d»
87
Out
w
%4
Sample
Box
Temp.
(opy
33E?y.*M«»
(MHijijjin*
^«»,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
yd
^r ^5
_JTS_
Vacuum
on ''
Sample
Train
•-c »-:•
O"^"s
j*^«* JT:*%J
cS^vSl
— ~_
i
!
•
'
j
,
i
i
-------
Plant
jbiMViKUNMluYIAL ENGINEERING, INC,
I Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DAtA SHEET
Sampling Location_
Date 2^-2^-7'2, Run No,
Time End
Time Start
Sampling Time/Point
DB *W]) °F, WB ^r^F; VF @ DP
Hg
Moistur
FDA
.Gas Density Fact or
Barometric Pres
Weather
Temp.
, Stack PressJ|'.$ "Hg
> W/D
,W/S
Sample Box No.
Meter AH@
ie Dia.
Meter Box No.
ft
Probe Heater Setting _L
******$ -r*»
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter Q^|f in
Inside Area £*?,, j^jj^Ex.2
Height ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica
.ft->
~ft3'
ml
Silica Gel Container No._
Orsat: C02
02
. CO
No ."
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
o£ Port
(in)
il&M <£"
|^ -
.4
y 0
•
Clock
Time
£'35T
Gas Meter
Reading
-(ft3)
^-"7 S
o /*l®
*$£*• l/tyO
.-—
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
"&i &2~
rf^>rf *7^
vi^r Q
^£^
Vacuum
i
on
Sample
Train
J^oj
.^s*,
(Ci jf®
O«- f J
VWI«.LIL:!"'. j cwrST*«i.«r*^
j
!
"
.
j
-------
Plant
Samp ling Loation
E'
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Time Start
SampjjjTg Time/Point
DB
'°P, WB ^°F. VF @ DP
Mo i s ture^.-fll, FDA *7 jy. l/Gas Density F act or_
.W/S
Barometric Press.l^V'Hg, Stack
V/oatlier |
Temp. °F, W/D
Sample Box No. ""2-- Meter Box No.
Meter &H@ /,6>"%>itot Corr. Factor^
Nozzle Dia. l/jAn., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area_j*
Height ~
'^p
IT
d/9*M"
. N\ ^^^iSssta^
- NX **^ J
A •/ /
-//
6-
Final Gas Meter Reading ASia"* *7<3o ft-
Initial Gas Meter Reading yO. -^ v^ ft-
Total Condensate in Impiijgqrs /j*? ml
*-^*wl«< — - - » ^*^ •
Moisture in Silica Gel29%9-ZJ$~Srs /$£ gm
Silica Gel Container No. ^'Z^ Filter No^£i?j1
* *
Orsat: C07
02
CO
N?
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: ^t 'j^'UJi&^g **^s
0
•
Ren1
ft
']
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp ,
Gas Sample
Temp . S Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp.
In Out
Last
Impir^er
Test
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
IQI, s
So.
la
& 9
3
583
.72
/O ; O
ions
72
21-
Zff
77
•HW*-*V «\
sQ
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
(W*l
A? 1^5
f
fo
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
- gn
J
^5^n
f &
Clock
Time
/&<&
//tOf
QSMfStSZO
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
!^%r
<**>**»
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
O*Zf
0. 2^
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc,, ! Actual
®k£/
^,f/
o.8f
o,n
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
9A
||CJ
f^^A
#<$
<-^r,.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
?F
7?
«r«t#!
Out
^3
( *a&
*~$fi
/T
f /
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO'
«JWUU1U^*
^^aj It^f-
5=»ra»
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
73
75
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
$?»O
S (^
P®#V?
'
!
I
. ! .
.
. . . • . .
!
t
i
'
- .
i
-------
LNV JlONMcmKL ciNtjJNEEKilNG*, INC.'
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
j
Sampling Location
Date 2fe3f?3*
Run No.
/
Time Start J£\ I/O Time hnd
Sampling Time/Point 4-Q 3o ~
f^'-'
@ DP
Hg
MoisturGAJj,FDA_
__,Gas Density Factor__
Barometric Press«3.O"Hg, Stack Press^C_
iveather
Hg
F, iV/D
,!V/S
Meter Box No.
Sample Box No.__X,_
Meter AH@ !•"? Pitot Corr. Factor , & J
Nozzle Dia-j.J?J?_in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting £>/U
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area "
Height
in
Tt2
" ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container N
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
J , £> "7*7
CfO
ml ,
. & '
Filter
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks \
p-f-.Z
2-
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
'of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
• Stack
Velocity
Head
(MH20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp .
Gas Sample
Temp.g Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
Out
Sample
Box/
Te
Last
Impirger
Test
C°F)
\:acuuir,
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
I- /
' 7
LO.
o
3L
A"/
is:
LL
(p
2-
^ * o
/
5 *
- )
.'-A
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack .
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
C'H20)
Calc. i Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas - Meter
In
Out
Sanple
Box
Temp,
C°F)'
Last
Impinger
Temp,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
f
^
5V
II
7!?
g/f
/3
. 6
73'jb
ft
tf
ft)
3,35
/3
13:
5-77
1*0
it
6
7
w
to
Jdo
lot
n
S9 7,7
55"
101
'bo
5?
.£•'55
.._,
lob
70
75
M
/3
• 70
-lo
ttf
\S\l
• 10
f-
^**i . i i* .^
-------
/ INC.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant RuA/"0-P|l£ AHafStata^ Mat '1 Processing Rate
Sampling Location () (jfL £T /1/OfTh.
Date <2- 13^/7 3- Run No, ?— '
Time Start /"7 » O4- Time End
Sampling Time/Point ^fl)/n @ 30f>k- &O f° '
DB $^ °F, IVB °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Moisture^?' / % , FDA »9?&, Gas Density Factor
Barometric Fress3o"Hg, Stack Press S° "Hg
We a the r C / £ ^ ^
Termo.^^ °F, 1V/D - ,W/S C^ir^
Sample Box No, / Meter Box No. •""
Meter AH@/-7^Pitot Corr. Factor . ^3
Nozzle Dia. .^5 in. , Probe Length <£> ft
Probe Heater Setting 'O^yU^
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter/7^' in
Inside Area ft^
Height ft
•
Final Gas Meter Reading
x~7 'Q tf O f~>c~~7 -F*3
/ a^ n '^A-C^7 / Ii-
Initial Gas Meter Reading £>&% '-aCf? ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers T (o mlA
Moisture in Silica Gel
^6*233.^sgr
Silica Gel Container No. fo/*} Filter No.72^^
Orsat: C09
02
CO
N?
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: /•
. A fcfco yo
*
Remarks :
C"
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
i
^
3
M
£
L,
n
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
,
Clock
Time
I1:Vl>-V
(^o-o
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
.25-
'35-
.35-
'4-5-
,,50
• 55"
• ^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
/,o
I'V
/'^
/•^
^'D
a.2-
2. 35
Actual
AO
I'l
/-1/
/^
^L'O
5.^
&•&
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
^?
?9
f?
«"7
??
S"?
??
Gas Sample
Temp.g Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
9?
^
?^
?^
100
loo
IOD
Out
1*
^
?5
?V
9^
fV
?f
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
s-r
%Q
%a
%o
to
go
fro
Vacuum
on
' Sample
Train
("Hg)
s
&>.&
1
1$
/2
/3-r
ZV i
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
C"H20)
Gale,
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
TO
Gas Sample
Temp, @ Dry
Gas Meter
TO
In
Out
S'ample
Box
Temp,
TO~
Last
Impinger
Temp,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
n
—i
II
Q
isL
/s
-A-
I*
\3--3Z
-------
it $uA)-£>^pile
ri-~<-j />«
Sampling Location
Date r?/ / A-Z- Run No,
EiNUj.illEEK.uNj,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Time Start/ Q"\Q% Time End
Sampling Time/Point «f ^^ 6?
°F, VF @ DP
'Hg
Mo i s ture £.< 5% , FDA_#7£^, Gas Density F act or
Barometric Press 3o "Hg, Stack Press 3 O"Hg
Weather
Temp.
Sample Box No, A_^___Meter Box No. —"_
Meter AH@ /. ~j Pitot Corr, Factor r ^ .3
Nozzle Dia.*P-^ in., Probe Length (p ft
Probe Heater Setting (
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height ——-—
in
Tt2
" ft
Mat'l Processing Rate_
Final Gas Meter Reading X
// ft5
Initial Gas Meter Reading 73% -
Total Condensate in Impingers /
Moisture in Silica Gel
gm
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C02
02
CO
Filter No
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks : -Si' / 1 c ft to f 1
fl
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
1 I
Z-
5
M
5"
£
7
Distance
, from End
of Port
(in.)
.
l , -„-.-.. ^.-..^..^.^.im, ----- -,-r--
Clock
Time
9:0$
9:/2-
9;/^
9:20
[i'z^j
9--^
9/32^
Gas Meter
Reading ,
(ft3)
73&4?Z-
'71/0. z-
7^2.- «/'
7W9
7v?.^
•7sl5'7
-7r3.^
7^7.^
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
'^.C
.a?
•30
•Vo
^5-
•5^
' ^5
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
•fo
!2o
/•6
/'?
a-o
^'^
Actual
• ?<5
A^
A^0
/•(.
/^
5-'©
s^. ;z-
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
u
^6
2-^
^6
g7^
££>
^6
Gas Sample
Temp.g Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
73
7f
7V
?•?
7^
7<£
75-
Out
70
7o
70
11
?/
7^-
7-3-
Sample
Box
Temp .
(°F)
Last
Impinge r
Test
(°F)
• s
-------
f
In
Port and
raverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
ra
Gas Sample
Temp«@Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
i
Sample
Train
1
£'3
10
. /
5"
To
I!
7
f :
,53
(
7S
J2._J
^fTU/zIZJ
2.
6
7
7
7?
• 9/
7
79s: 3
A
80 /.
g&u.q
to:
A. 3
.7. r
9
?//. 9
0
'3.35
10
w:
gy
(I
10 .'
- 3
f
73
:
\5
it:
63
* 5
H
'(,3
yo
j
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
k
Sampling Location Atxrtfir JSbttvvi
Date Zh.ft
}l?t Run No, 1
Time Start /Z'^0 T
Sampling Time/Point ^
DB °F,
Moisture^
ime End
13 a V
WB °F, VF @ DP "Pig
^ 1 , FDA , Gas Density F act or
Barometric Pres?2f fe'Hg ,
— *-*~^*^^
leather
Stack Pr?
^7ft£?K°
Te;np. °F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No, ^3 . Meter Box No.
Meter &H@
Pitot 'Corr. Factor
ft V>
• e»^
Nozzle Dia. »<£5*in. , Probe Length £ ft
Probe Heater Setting 2t-$ / w>
Stack Dimensions: inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
ft/f?T^ ^j 7"
/
-Z
3
.jf
S
Jo
1
Distance
from End
'of Port
(in.)
*
Diameter ^ 2"> in
Area JL*$ c <&•/ ... ^- 1
/ ft
Clock
Time
]1 \ 40
fit 44
ll'4t
/ 2 *&&
l_t$$
/ ?&¥
/}_&$
t
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stfl'bQ
348. £
3^9
&£% ±y
-3S4- $
356 ,9
_^^/L^'T!
3£4'dT'
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H2OJ
JO
I /^
,/&?
.21
'2.3
' 2.3
Mat'l Processing
Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading *4-2L/ , $82~~ f t3
Initial Gas Meter Reading &4$fi & && ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers •*$$ ^1
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No
Orsat: C07
02
CO
' Excess
Air
>&%(„ Filter "No. 75<»-Ai3
Test Conducted by: "Hi ( | T^<£,?JL^, '^f
• Remarks :
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
X0
>^_
;£$'
tk$
,M
^2t.
iS^L
Actual
/"4^;
?£&
s£>S"
*.&£"'
/$4
.ty
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F)
$$*F
ff %*
%g&
¥8*
& @
<*T" O O
tf$*
Gas Sample
Temp . @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
>&>
H~
$3
$3
u
Out
8/
//
%/
$/
$1
%J
81
Sample
Box
Temp,
C°F)
Last Vacv.ur. |
Impiigcr on
Test - Sample
(°F) Train
("Hg)
\r *~^ *****$
JJbi* \*t*£"
ff^fl) ; i/.^'
^\^\.l,S
_gj :^v^
5gjr j
-------
Port and
[Traverse
'Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press,Diff,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
*
on
Sample
Train
-------
L.V
1
JUNO.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location @^
Date 2.-2.9 — 77/ Run No,
Time Start
, Gas Density F act or
Sampling Time/Point
DB
Moisture
Barometric
Weather
Temp.
'Hg , Stack Press 3c/.7("Hg
F, W/D
,W/S
Sample Box No. £j^~~? Meter Box No,
Meter AH£/Cj£#_Pitot Corr. Factor^
Nozzle Dia. in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting 2 IT. *f
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
in
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
fC Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
ft3
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C02
02
CO
Filter
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by :__ /> ,
-------
ort and
Traverse
Point'No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Pveading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
Plant
+ 0 - ft/* Mfy
Sampling Location /^ 7^/4 r
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Datc^f
A^
Run No.
Time End
Time Start
Sampling Time/Point_
DB °F, WB °F, VF @ DP
Hg
ig,
Barometric Press9$$£i
Weather
Temp.
,Gas Density Fact or
Stack Pr<
F, W/D
,W/S
Sample Box No,
* Meter Box No.
•*• In. , Probe Length
Probe Heater Settin
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
in
Tt2
" ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
_ft-3
,3d&" ft5
___2___mi
Qf? gin
Silica Gel Container No.£23 Filter
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
a
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.Q Dry
Gas Meter
In Out
70
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
'(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press,Diff,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
GRAB SAMPLE COLLECTION
-------
E.Pfl Sarnie. f/o.
Rtw Wo,
C-
Tl
wie.
S'.oo
•. AS
Si •
A \v\0h
s<
%2.'
PH
u^O
\.7-S
vV
\ ft
. \.,;1
-ov—
-------
J_
j
EPR S
Wo.
Rtw Mo.
c.
Dafe.
\'.Oo
"Tew\
,°p
b
PH
\.vs !
I ^.^S
\ ,.
fluoride.*
C
V
>» o s i V ft, ^
\ ^
-------
1
EPfl Sample, f.'o.
Run Wo.
Date,
Pot At
Jp_H.
\ . \ o
I I I I
Os
Metal
s
• V X
6,1 -va.*
-------
EPA S
Run f/o,
A
Daf
2
Tl
wte.
-. o
S A VA 0 \ 1 vl n Po 1
Yevv\P eraure
PH
AUtal
ks _______ A
«
-------
<«
nir.3
OJ3
EPR
f/0.
Rum No,
\o'.oo
\\ '
,c F
\.\o
\,
R
-------
i«o.
Ruvt Wo.
A
3
Dafe.
\\\oo
it ft "> «-'»
Aw\0hvv? VotvU
-4—-
1
19
il
> s
-tti
-------
APPENDIX C
Standard Analytical Procedures
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
' '. ' ' Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to '.''**''•' '' •' ;
Ann of: , .n t
*•••'• Date: 12-21-72
Subject: Summary of Fluoride Analysis • • c •
*7~ • ; •
°' R." Neuiicht, EMB, IRL • . i
This memorandum is in response to your request for a brief
summary of our SPADNS-Zirconium Lake procedure for determination
of fluoride in stack emission samples.
Samples received in our laboratory are filtered through
fluoride free paper filters to yield water soluble and water insoluble
portions. The water insoluble particulate collected on the filter
is rinsed throughly to be sure that all water soluble fluoride is
rinsed through. The water soluble fraction is distilled from sul-
furic acid to a maximum temperature of 180 C. If chloride is suspected
in the sample Ag So . is added to the still.. SPADNS solution is added
to an aliquot of the distillate and the absorbance is read at 570 nm.
The concentration of the sample is determined from a calibration curve
prepared from standard fluoride solutions. It is very important that
the temperature of the samples be the same as that of the standards
when absorbances are recorded. i
. The water insoluble fraction of the sample is evaporated, to dry-
ness in the presence ot a slurry or UAU, anu tiitm Iu&«J «1 LI * "1^311. The
fusate is dissolved with distilled water, neutralized with dilute H So ,
distilled and analyzed as described for the soluble portion.
Paper filters containing particulate are cut into small pieces,
suspended in a slurry of CAO, evaporated to dryness and ashed prior
to the alkali fusion and distillation.
If you have any questions about this procedure, let me know.
tioward L. Crist
Chief, Source Sample Analysis Section
SSFAB, QAEML
cc: . R. E. Lee
-------
Phosphorous Pentoxide Determination
o
Colorimetric Molybdovanadophosphate Method
An aliquot of sample is hydrolyzed in the presence of HC1 and
HNO acids by boiling almost to dryness..
f ,
The sample is cooled to room temperature, transferred to a
250 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water.
A 20 ml aliquot is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask, 20 ml
of molybdovanadate reagent is 'added and the flask is diluted to
volume.
The absorbance of the yellow color is determined after ten min
utes at 400 nm. The concentration of phosphorous pentoxide is de-
termined from a calibration curve prepared with standard solutions.
• - • • f '
-------
APPENDIX D
Project Participants
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
John Dollar
Tony Arroyo
Bill Demery
Bob Durgan
Eric Johnson
Bob Maxwell
A. L. Wilson
tJnrrDTscherf i nger
Jerome Rom
Leslie Evans
Roy Neulicht
Project Manager
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Speciali:st
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
EPA-
EPA
EPA
------- |