72 - CI - 21
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS AND CHEMICALS
DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
BARTON, FLORIDA
MARCH 13 - 14, 1972
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
_
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS AND CHEMICALS
DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
BARTOW, FLORIDA
MARCH 13 - 14, 1972
Test Conducted By:
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
U"«"*-»— ' '
Contract CPA - 70 - 82
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures iii
List of Tables iii
Introduction 1
Summary of Results 1
Process Description 10
Process Operation 10
Location of Sampling Points 11
Sampling and Analytical Procedures 18
Appendix
A. Emission Calculations and Results
B. Field Data
C. Standard Analytical Procedures
D. Project Participants •
\
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Flow Diagram
2. Sample Port Location - Reactor Scrubber Inlet
3. Sample Port Location - Reactor Scrubber Outlet
4. Sample Port Location - Dryer Scrubber Inlet
5. Sample Port Location - Dryer Scrubber Outlet
6. Sample Port Location - Screen-Mill Scrubber Inlet
7. Sample Port Location - Screen-Mill Scrubber Outlet
8. Sample Train - Moisture
9. Sample Train Fluoride
Page
3
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
21
LIST OF TABLES
1. Results
2. Results
3. Results
4. Results
5. Results
6. Results
Reactor Scrubber Inlet
Reactor Scrubber Outlet
Dryer Scrubber Inlet
Dryer Scrubber Outlet
Screen-Mill Scrubber Inlet
Screen-Mill Scrubber Outlet
4
5
6
7
8
9
m
-------
INTRODUCTION
Under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental
Engineering, Inc. conducted emission tests at the IMC phosphate works In Bartow,
Florida. On March 13 - 14, 1972, three test runs were conducted on IMC's
dicalcium phosphate production facilities. The purpose of the tests was to
obtain data for the use of both the Industrial Studies Branch and the Performance
Standards Branch of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Measurements for total fluorides were made at the inlet and outlet ducts
of the reactor - granulator, dryer, and screen-mill scrubbers. Grab samples of
the scrubbing liquids, the process reactants and the process product were
analyzed for fluoride and P^O,- content. A schematic flow diagram indicating the
sampling locations is given in Figure 1.
Complete test results are given in Appendix A.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The plant was operating under normal process conditions during all of the
test runs. However, in order to complete two test runs before the plant shut
down on March 15, the total sample times of the second and third runs were
shortened from 120 minutes to 90 and 70 minutes, respectively.
The only major problem encountered with the sampling occurred at the inlet
to the reactor - granulator scrubber; the duct was extremely dusty and the probe
frequently became plugged. To alleviate this problem,the nozzle diameter was
increased from 0.250 to 0.50 inch. In addition, the test times of the first,
second, and third runs were reduced from 120 minutes to 42, 34, and 28 minutes,
respectively.
-------
Due to the fact that a larger nozzle was used for the tests at
station "J", all three test runs were performed at an isokinetic rate
outside of the acceptable range (90% - 110%). Run 1 at the screen-
mill scrubber inlet (station "N") was also performed at an under-
isokinetic rate. Due to this fact, the reported test results may be
biased on the high side.
Runs two and three performed at the dryer scrubber inlet (station
"L") were both conducted at a rate above the acceptable isokinetic rate
which may have biased (the reported results to the low side. All of
the above-mentioned test points are scrubber inlets. It has been pointed
out that some of the reported results are probably biased due to iso-
kinetic variations. Any error involved would, of course, affect the
validity of the calculated scrubber efficiencies.
During the first test run at the dryer scrubber outlet (station "K")
the nozzle size was changed in an attempt to maintain an isokinetic
sampling rate; nonetheless, an isokinetic rate was not maintained within
an acceptable range. Therefore, the data from this particular test run
at the dryer scrubber outlet should not be considered in establishing
new source performance standards.
It should be noted that the test samples from the second run at
station "M" and the third run at station "N" were damaged in transit;
consequently, no emission data is available for these test runs.
A complete summary of stack gas conditions emission levels, and
scrubber efficiencies for each test run and test location is given in
Tables 1 - 6.
-------
X'
Granulator
Reactor / Dryer
Scrubber
Screens, Mills
©
Scrubber
Scrubber
v
Figure 1
Location of Sampling Points
IMC Dicalcium Phosphate
To Atmosphere
A
Stack
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "J"
REACTOR SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P?, SCFM
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?05 Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P205 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
3/14/72
30
29.5
8.8
134
9319
52.289
2.6
78.6
0.0008
0.023
0.0006
0.019
0.061
1.85
0.002
0.065
2
3/15/72
30
29.5
9.5
134
10402
58.045
1.7
92.7
0.0005
0.025
0.0004
0.020
0.04
2.19
0.001
0.070
3
3/15/72
30
29.5
10.2
134
10971
50.698
2.2
1 20, 2
0.0007
0.037
0.0005
0.029
0.063
3.43
0.002
0.115
•\Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "K"
REACTOR SCRUBBER OUTLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure 5 inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P?, SCFM
"it
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P90,- Fed.
I— x)
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton Pp05 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
3/14/72
. 30
28.67
9.2
120
1 5902
64.943
1.6
1.6
0.0004
0.0004
0.0003
0.0003
0.076
0.076
0.003
0.003
95.9
2
3/15/72
30
28.67
14
125
14636
41.542
1.7
3
0.0006
0.0011
0.0005
0.0008
0.079
0.140
0.003
0.004
93.6
3
3/15/72
30
28.67
13.8
130
14293
28.117
1.3
3.5
0.0007
0.0019
0.0005
0.0014
0.087
0.235
0.003
0.008
93.1
\Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "L"
DRYER SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate G> S.T.P?, SCFM
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , -mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P^O,- Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P^O,- Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
3/14/72
30
29.62
28.8
191
56821
90.93
5
11.1
0.0008
0.0019
0.0005
0.0011 •
0.41
0.92
0.01
0.03
—
2
3/15/72
30
29.62
27.9
193
55688
82.547
36
48.3
0.0067
0.009
0.0039.
0.0052
3.2
4.3
0.10
0.14
—
3
3/15/72
30
29.62
.34.7
193
53543
55.766
1.9
2.6
0.0005
0.0007
0.0003
0.0004
0.24
0.33
0.01
0.01
—
VDry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "M"
DRYER SCRUBBER OUTLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, • °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S'.T.P*, SCFM
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P-Og Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton PpOj-.Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
3/14/72
30
28.65
18.2
152
65093
58.127
0.6
0.6
0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
0.0001
0.09
0.09
0.003
0.003
90.2
2
3/15/72
30
28.65
18.5
154
66647
53.501
No Lab
Data
3
3/15/72
30
28.65
20
156
64734
37.366
0.5
0.5
0.0002
0.0002
0.0001
0.0001
0.11
0.11
0.004
0.004
66.7
"'Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "N"
SCREEN MILL SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P?, SCFM
•it
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg .
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P,>05 Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P^Og Fed. •
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
3/14/72
30
29.59
3.2
140
45350
79.2
18.9
53.4
0.0037
0.0104
0.0031
0.0088 '
.1.43
4.04
0.05
0.14
2
3/15/72
30
29.59
3.7
138
37953
62.635
1.3
34
0.0003
. 0.0084
0.0003
0.0071
0.1
2.7
0.003
0.087
3
3/15/72
30
29.59
3.2
139
33424
41.548
No Lab
Data
NDry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
8
-------
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "P"
SCREEN MILL SCRUBBER OUTLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P*, SCFM
Vt
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total , gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P^O,- Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P205 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, % . •
1
3/14/72
30
28.5
12
124
41858
64.245
2.2
2.2
0.0005
0.0005
0.0004
..0.0004.
0.19
0.19
0.007
0.007
95.3
2
3/15/72
30
28.5
13.5
125
39716
46.911
1.8
1.8
-0.0006
,0.0006.
.0.0004
0.0004 .
0.20,
0.20
0.006
0,006
92.6
3
3/15/72
30
28.5
-13.3
125
40005
36.878
2.8
2.8
0.0012
0.0012
0.0009
0. 0009 .
0.40
0.40
0.013
0.013
M)ry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
Process Description
Defluorinated phosphoric acid and limestone are mixed in a
pug mill reactor to form dicalcium phosphate as follows:
2 H3P04 + CaO » CaH4(P04)2- H20
Ca'H4(P04)2' H20 + CaO + 2 H20 —» 2 CaHP04« 2 H20
The product is dried and screened before being conveyed to
storage.
The air pollution control system consists of three scrubbers,
one on the reactor-granulator, and one each on the dryer and screens.
Dilute phosphoric acid is used as the scrubbing medium.
Process Operation
Operating conditions were normal for the three test runs conducted
from March 14 to March 15, 1972.
10
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling sites and number of traverse points were
selected as per "Method I - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Sta-
tionary Sources, Part 60, Subchapter C, Chapter 1, Title 40," Federal
Register, No. 247-Pt. II-l.
The above method suggests using two perpendicular diameters
of traverse points per sampling station, however, on-site conditions
necessitated the use of only one traverse diameter. The suggested
number of traverse points per diameter was used where possible without
sampling within one inch of the inner wall.
Figures 2 through 7 are schematic diagrams of the stack
configurations near the sampling location, and the sampling points
traversed during the emission tests.
11
-------
SAMPLE: LOCATION j
REACTOR-GRANULATOR INLETT
TRAVERSE
POINT NO.
I
Z
3
4
if
G
7
e>
9
10
u
12,
13
14-
15"
IG
n
19
ZO
DISTANCE"
FRCHM PORT
(INCHES)
l
I 9/32-
2. 1/32.
3 1132.
4- 1/4-
5 ~r/<6
G 3/4-
B 1/4-
iO 3/32.
i 2. 13 / 1 G
ZO 3/ife
ZZ Z9/32
Z4 3/4-
2.G i /4-
2 T 3/\
Z8 3/4-
29 I'3./!G
3 1 33/^3 Z
3Z 1/2.
FIGURE 2
12
-------
-A
FLOOR
SAMPLE LOCATION tt K"
. REACTOR-GRANULATOR OUTLt
42.'
*
'•A'
i/Z
BLOWER
TRAVERSE:
POINT NO,
i
z
3
4*
£•
£
7
&
9
10
II
12
DISTANCE:
FROM PORT
f INCHET-S)
\
3 i/8
5 1/8
e S/KS
1 1 3/4-
IG M/JG
3O 5-/I6
3S 1/4-
38 li/IG
4- 1 r/i
-------
i
6
SAMPLE LOCATION vx L
DRYER INLEIT
-G9' X. D.
TRAVERSE:
POINT NO,
i
z
3
4
5-
6
7
e
9
10
II
IZ
DISTANCE
FROM PORT
CINCHETS)
1 7/lG
4 S/8
8 f/S
iZ ?>/&
17 i/4-
Z4 i/2.
44 1/2.
St 3/4-
5G 3/4-
GO 7/S
G4- 3/8
67 9/«6
FIGURE 4.
14
-------
SAMPLE LOCATION
DRYER OUTLET
A'
FLOOR
41
A'
i e i/z
FIGURE 5
15
TRAVERSE"
POINT NO.
t
a
3
4-
5
6
7
S
9
10
ii
12-
13
14-
DiSTANCE
FROM POP,T
( INCHES)
I 3/IG
5" ^/3Z
8 3i/3a
13 T/3E.
IS 3/IG
E4 H/32
33 13/3Z
57 3/8
G6 5Y32-
7/i 57 IS
T7 9/32.
et 9/ie
©5 H/32.
e© T/e.
I.D.
-------
4.
15"
Zl II/3Z
38 li/iG
45-
-^Q 3/8
^Z 15/iG.
JJC.
SS 1/2.
AX-A'
FIGURE 6
16
-------
SAMPLE LOCATION
^
A'
FLOOR
4-a'
t , „ „'
A'
.._ _/
IT, s
FIGURE 7
' 17
SCRECN
OUTLET
TRAVETRSE:
POINT NO.
I
2
3
5*
G
7
8
9
to
DISTANCE:
FROM PORT
72" i. a
I 13/56
5 29/32.
10 1/2
IG 1/4-
5/8
55
G I 1/2.
<0G> 3/32
TO T/3Z
-------
:•.. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Preliminary Moisture Determination
The preliminary moisture content of the stack gases at each
sampling site was determined by Method .4 of the Federal Register
(Volume 36, Number 247, Part II, December 23, 1971).
The only significant difference between F.R. Method 4 and
the method used was the configuration of the sampling train (see
Figure 8 ). The sampling train used in these tests consisted of the
first two midget impingers with 5 grams of distilled-deionized water
followed by two dry midget impingers in place of a silica gel cartridge.
After completing the moisture run, the total impinger liquid
plus water rinsings of the probe tip thorough the fourth impinger were
placed in an 8 ounce polyethylene container. The samples were held by
EPA personnel for further analyses.
Field data sheets are contained in Appendix B.
B. Preliminary Velocity Determination
Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register was used as
a guide in determining the preliminary stack gas velocity for each source
tested. The major difference was that only the maximum and minimum
18
-------
1. Heated Glass Probe
2. Glass Connector
3. Ice Bath
4. Midget Impinger With 5
5. Midget Impinger With
5. Midget Impinger, Dry
7. Midget Impinger, Dry
8., Flexible Sample Line
9. Vacuum Gauge
10. Main Control Valve
_,!!. By-Pass Control. Valve
10 12. Air Tight Vacuum Pump
13. Dry Test Meter
14. Thermometer
15.' Calibrated Orifice
16. Inclined Manometer
17. S-Type Pi tot Tube
Figure 8
MOISTURE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
velocity heads across each stack area were determined so that a proper
nozzle size could be selected. During each of the three fluor.ide
emission tests, velocity head readings were taken at points selected
by using Method 1 of the Federal Register.
Stack pressure and temperature measurements were also made
during the preliminary velocity determinations.
C. Sampling for Fluoride Emissions
The sampling procedure used for determining fluoride emissions
was similar to Method 5 of the Federal Register. The major difference
between the two methods was the configuration of the sampling train.
The sampling train described in the Federal Register has a heated box
containing the filter holder directly following the glass probe. The
sampling train used in these tests contained no heated box and the filter
holder was placed between the third and fourth impingers (between dry
impinger and silica gel impinger) to prevent sample carry-over. -Figure 9
is a schematic diagram of the sampling train used.
After the selection of the sampling site and the minimum number
of sampling points per Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register,
three separate test runs were performed. For each run, the required
stack and sampling parameters were recorded on field data sheets. They
are included in Appendix B. Readings were taken at each traverse point
at least every five minutes, and when significant changes in stack para-
meters necessitated additional adjustments to maintain an isokinetic flow
rate. Nomographs were used to aid in the rapid adjustment of the sampling
20
-------
1 t
9.
5.
7.
o
•roi
14.
15.
16.
17.
Hoc
Ics
in!ess Steel Nozzle
ted Glass Probe
ss Connector
Bath
nqer with
19
I-
r with
Dry
r v/ith
-LO (Modified Tip)
Q (Standard Tip)
100 nil
100 ml
(Modified Tip)
180 grams Silica Gel (Modified Tip)
.9. Filter Holder with No. 1 Whatman Filter
le Sample Line
Gauge
Control Valve
By-Pass Control Valve '
Air Tight Vacuum Pump
Dry Test Meter
ibrated Orifice
inclinc-d
19. S-Type Pi tot
17
Figure 9
FLUORIDE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
rate. The traverse points were selected to maintain at least one inch
from the inner stack wall.
After each run, the liquid volume in the first three impingers
was measured volumetrically and the silica gel was reweighed. The im-
pinger liquid, the filter, plus the water washings of the probe and other
sampling train components up to the silica gel were placed into a single
polyethylene container.
D. Liquid and Product Grab Samples
Periodically, during each test run, grab samples of the raw
materials, finished product, and scrubber liquid were taken, and the
temperature and pH were determined at the site. All samples were split
with the plant personnel so that comparative analyses could be performed.
E. Laboratory Analysis Procedures
Water soluble fluorides were done by a sulfuric acid distilla-
tion followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD. Water insoluble
fluorides were first fused with NaOH followed by a sulfuric acid dis-
tillation then by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD.'
P20r analysis of the stack effluent was done by EPA personnel.
All other P^O^ analyses were done by plant personnel.
For more details of exact method used, see Appendix C.
22
-------
APPENDICES
-------
APPENDIX A
Emission Calculations and Results
-------
E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE SHEET
PB - Barometric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
As - Stack area, sq. ft.
AS'- Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. ft.
NPTS - Number of traverse points where the pitot velocity head was greater than zero
TS - Stack temperature, °R '
TM - Meter temperature, °R
_____
Ii - Average square root of velocity head, '/inches
AH - Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches H20
AN - Sampling nozzle area, square feet
CP - S-type pitot tube correction factor
VM - Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
VC -Condensate and silica gel increase in impringers, milliliters
Po - Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, fPB +A H~[ inches Hg
L 13
STP - Standard conditions, dry, 70°F, 29.92 inches Hg
VWV - Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
VSTPD - Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
' • • VT - Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
W - Moisture fraction of stack gas .
FDA - Dry gas fraction
MD - Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-ino'le (dry conditions)
MS - Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (stack conditions)
GS - Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to air
EA - Excess air, %
//HxTS_ - Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
U - Stack gas velocity, fee-t per minute
QS - Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (stack conditions)
QD - Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (dry conditions)
QSTPD - Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (STP)
PISO - Percent isokinetic volume sampled (method described in Federal Register)
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
VWV = (0.0474) x (VC) .
VSTPD = (17.71 x (VM) x (PB + -^- ) -^ TM
13.6
•VT = (VWV) + (VSTPD)
W = (VWV)-r-(VT) • . . ..•
FDA = (1.0) - (W)
FMOIST = Assumed moisture fraction
MD = (0.44 x %''CO_) + (0.32 x % 09) -.+ (0.28 x % N,) + (0.28 x % CO)
2. • • *• ~ •
MS = (MD x FDA) H- (18 x W)
GS = (MS)-i- (28.99)
EA = (100) x (% 0''--
U = (174) x (CP) x (H) x V(TS x 29.92)-7-(GS x PS)
QS = (U) x (AS)
QD = (QS) x (FDA)
QSTPD = (QD) x (-IM.) x (?-?-)
29.92 TS
PISO = (o. oo267 x VC x TS) + (PQ x TS x VM TM) —- (Time x U x PS x AN)
Fluoride Emissions:
MG = Milligrams of fluoride from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG) -^ VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF) -7- (TS)
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD)
^2^5 Fec* = Toris/hour, determined from plant data
Lbs/ton P20 Fed = (Ibs/hour) ~ (Tons/hour P0 Fed)
-------
IQURCE IHl.
TEST UO - ' NO OF RUNS
PL/1//? - I.M.C. PHOSPHATES BARTOW, FLA.
-SOURCE - REACTOR II1LET STATION J
TYPE OF PLAIIT - DICAL
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES
- 3
DRUiJ NUMBER
2 ) DA TE
3) TIME BEGAN
H ) TIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, 1 77 HG
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, I H H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COHD, CUBIC FEET
8) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEG F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET .
10)TOTAL 1120 COLLECTED, ML
11) VOL 7720 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU FI
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H) PERCENT C02
11J)PERCEUT 02
1&)PERCEI'JT CO
IT) PER CENT 7/2
1B)PERCEHT EXCESS AIR
1Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COIU.
21 )S TACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD ) , .111 H20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE , DEG F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP* VEL HEAD )
2S)PITOT CORRECT '10 II FACTOR
2S)STACK PRESSURE, HJ HG , ABSOLUTE
27 )S TACK GAS VEL, STACK COIW, F.P.I!..
2B)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
23)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30)5 TA CK GA S F LOW RATE, S.T.P. , S CFMD
31) NET TIME OF TEST, HI11UTES- •
32)SAMPLIIIC NOZZLE DIAMETER, -INCHES
33)PERCEi-JT ISOKIIJETIC
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, !JG
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3b)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
31) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3B)FLUORIDE --WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
39)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK Ci"D.
HQ)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE , LB /HOUR
HDFLUOXIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
H3)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., LiJ/TOfi F205 FED
HH)FLUORlDt-J - TOTAL, LB/TOi,: P2'05 FED
I
|
|
j^
-i _JL a. - 1 -
_l/.l.iLA7.2._l_3.Ai.5.A'?.3. L a
;Ul.;_4kS l_3_2-f-4-&.- 1- 3.
3.0. . _l_aa _ la
45 1 <1 1 r
1 5_3__LUL l-S-S-r-Oa. 1 I
I
|
n
a.5 a. _ i-ia.,.3 L _&.
i i
5. CL? 1 G. US. 1 r
_Q_>_Q L_Q.^5 . L i.
1_ 12 ..la.. 1 a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
J^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
„ 1 „ 1_
1 1
1 1
1 1
0 _[ Q_ 1 Q.
28^_85 J. 2A.A5. L o
27^9. ___1_2J J12 _ 1 ?
Q_, 9 6 _ 1 (L_9Jj_ 1 a
0 • 5 HI _1 CL-6HS. 1 Q.
134 1JL.3JL _ _1 _1
0.83_ 1 0_J33 _i _Q.
1 9 5 4 9 _| 2199.6 _[ _2_
5.94 _[5.94 _[ c.
5.94 15. 2't- 1 5_
9319 J_ 10402 _[ 1 •
42 J_ 34 1 2
0.25&0.510.& 1 o
58 1 71.4 I 6 '
2.6 I 1 . 7 1 ?
78.6 J_92.7 112
0.0008 _[ 0.000 5 J_ 0
0.0231 10.0246 1 0.
0.0006 J_ .0 . 0 0 0 4 _[ 0
0.0186 10.0196 _[ 0.
0. OG12 i 0.0402 1 0
I7T5'-r88 ~J_~2.1924 " 1 3
-1 1 _
Q . 0021 J_ 0.0013 J_ 0.
"0.131^0 J_ 0.0703 J. 0..
-3. 1
LI^"" 1
•"• ' " ' 1
1
i--.fi.gai L
1
^ * * n o J.
2-2. ° 1
"7. 1
0-3. 1
- „ _i
1
|
j
j
one I
i
o r.
"•4JL
2Ji- _J
n 3_
r^S.
3.'1 n -?
•ou
nu
"' q 7JL
8
. 5
7.1
0
0.2
.0007 '
037
. n Q n 5
029
'"'G " -c'>
.433
. n021
115
* * *S .T.P. -*~>-DR Y , 70. DECi-EES F, 29.92 I A' CHF.S MER C UR Y***
-------
no -
PLANT - I.M.C. PHOSPHATES
SOURCE - REACTOR OUTLET X
TYPE OF PLAtJT - DICAL
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES
no OF nuns
BAETOU, FLA.
DRUil NUMBER
2) DATE
3)TIME BEGAN
H) Til-IE END
^BAROMETRIC- PRESSURE, II! EG
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, III H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COI1D, CUBIC FEET
8)AVERAGE GAS METER . TEMPERATURE , DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
•10) TOTAL I! 20 COLLECTED, l\L
11)VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
12) STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H)PERCENT C02 . .
llj)PERCEHT 02 '• •
'-•1Q)PEI?CL'IJT CO
11) PER CENT 112
18)PERCEilT EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF .STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CO
21) STACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), III H20
23) AVERAGE- STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP-xVEL HEAD)
2b)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
. 2&)STACK PRESSURE, Hi HG , ABSOLUTE .
27 )S TACK GAS VEL, STACK . COND, F. P. I';.
2Q)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
2 *o c* n v ? f T)
O U ) O 1 A 0 A If A O ? Lt U to yi/i ± tlj , b . 1 . L * , &LL1 i'lU • •
31) MET TIME OF TEST, MIUUTES :
32)SAi-;PLIi1G KOZZLE DIAMETER, IIICHES
33)PERCE!:JT ISOKIiJETIC
3H)FLUOHIDE - WATER SOLUBLE* MG
36)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3'DFLUGIUDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3Q)FLUORIDE - '.-,' 'A TER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD
39) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD
HQ)FLUORIDE - l-.'ATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
HDFLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
H3)FLUORIDE - I/ A TEH SOL., LE/TOil P20'j FE
ilH)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, 'LB/TOii P205 FE
1 1 1
1-211HJ.22 1_
i_iitJ,Iij L_
1 17^.D5 _1
' i 30 _i
1 o^^it 1
1 66 1^. J.
1 81^8 1
J_ 64^943 J,
1 139^5 __1
F21! 6^61 J.
i_9^2 1
1 1^ -1
1_ I
1 _ 1
1 _ _1
1 - — i
1 °__ — 1
1 28. 85 _ 1
UDi 27.85 1
J, 0. 9G . _[
J_ 0. 673 J^
1 12° 1
ill. 03'4 1
I 1660.9 1
J_ 12 . 05 _[
J_ 1 2 . 05 J_
< 1 15902" i
J_ 120 j^
J_ 0.375 SO'. 2*5 J[
J_ ^24. B &71.41
1^1 1
J .'„_«-„_„ - J. —
• J. * __.__-!_
, i ~0"."TJITO~3 . |^
1 - * -^ r-t ,-,-,- 1
*l"u\irAb : r
' - a-/7-- -L
/? J_ u ."^O^T" j
JL i_ _!„
_3_Z.1.5_/_7_2._i 1/.15./.2.2.
"1 P • it V 1 '!r~«'ir"
U+ L.2.3__. i_ 15.i.Zfi.
30 i 2.0
0 ,J5 B J. 0^.53..
4?»_09 _[ 2859°
78.5 J. 8 3 J.
4 1 t_5 2 4 J. 2 8 JL 1 7
1 !.(. 2 . R J 95
6.7G J[ 45
14 J. 1 3 J3
14 1 _14
1
_ 1 _
1
1
0 _[ 0
28.85 J_ 28.85
27.33 J_ 27.35
0.94 J_ 0.94
0.443 _[ 0.433
125 .1 J_ 130
10.708 J_ 10.525
0.83 J_ 0.83
28.67 _[ 28.67
1627.1 J_ 1598.7
12.05 J_ 12.05
12.05 _[ 12.05
1 4 6 36 J[ 14293
"56 i 72
"O.lh j^ 0.25
" _ _ J ,_?_! _
^'T __ 1 " -
•5 A 3.3
T)7T3-07re j"!)"^-"/ —
D7"ni!TT |~"D7"DT3l7)
"^^.^ °_ L-^I^P5
"D.U'DTjB j^ "D.Oui^
"D . H7UT i T) . Ub7',:
"O.TUU'o' i "D.7"o'ri7)
1 -
T}^UU?^___Ji_T5j_oo:-y
D.tJuTj j^ D.OT571.;
|
_1
J_
|
. |
|
|
|
I
|
|
i
I
1
I
1
1
i
1
1
i
i
I
!
1
!
1
—
* * *S . T
70 DEGREES F, 29.92 IUCUES MERCURY***
-------
TEST HO - HO OF RUNS -
PLANT - I.H.C. PHOSPHATES BAR-TOW, FLA.
SOURCE - DRIER INLET STATIOFi L
TYPE OF PLANT - DICAL
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - . FLUORIDES
1)RUN NUMBER
2 ) DA TE
3)TIME BEGAN
H)TIUE END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
&)UETEH ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER .COND, CUBIC FEET
8)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE , DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.-P. , CUBIC FEET
.10)TOTAL 1:20 COLLECTED, UL
11) VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CD F
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H)PERCENT C02
IS) PERCENT 02 . •
17)PERCENT 112 .
IB) PERCENT EXCESS AIR
13)MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CON
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
' 2^)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD)
. 2 5) PI TOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2b)STACi: PRESSURE, IN HG, ABSOLUTE
27 )S TACK GAS VEL, STACK COND, F.-P.ti.
2B)STACK AREA, SQ FEET "
29 ) EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30) STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31) NET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
33) PER CENT IS OK IN STIC .
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
35) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
' 36)FLUORIDE - VATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
37)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3B)FLUORIDE - UATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
39)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD.
HO)FLUORIDE - UATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR-
HDFLUORIDE - TOTAL, IB /HOUR
WiFLUOPIDE - VATEH SOL., LB/TON F205 FED
H>4)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/TON P20!> FED
ill _s 1
1 15.4.00 L_t2*.§.a — . — L__iJi4~3_5
1 12 • 1CU 1- ^S-i-Q.3 -•- i. U)-.^
i__20_ JLaci— .- 1-JiP
1 2_3-3. 1 I-^SLC. 1 _?
1 2.!i D.6, 1 ° U> X2.3. 1 12—5 fU_
1 D.S. 1L i 8.7- 5- 1 _SJU_2_
i 9.0. 93 1 Q.2, 5.U.7_ 1 JJJL,_7J>f;
i 7Z1 5. 1 G.2.1' 1. 1 &r>lL
T\ 3.S. 2.^ i 3.L Q 5. 1 2J) _5 0
i 20.0. l^l0 l_3'-i-J
i 20 1 2.8. 1 JLp
i 1 _ 1
1 !____!
1 __1 --!-__
1 o Id 1 o
1 2 8 ^8 5 1 2JL 8JL 1 2 8_. 8 j}
'/)! 25 7^ 1 °5. d? J.250H
1 0 ^.8 9 J. Q.^.8_tL 1 0^ 8 7
1 0 ,_9 7 J. 0 ^.9 IL? 1 0 . 9 8 f;
1 '190^8 J. i.9_2_^B_ 1 193
1 2 4 J 5_ 1 ? H Op 1 2 5 . 1 G 0
i ° t_8 3 1 0 ^_8 3_ 1 °-i " 3
1 296? J.?9G_? _[29.G2
1 **l R *1 "^ Q lo'TOO ^5 1 '^^'^^ Q
| O O J. O e -J t \j 1 \J \J . O ' ) *•' *- ^ • *•'
J_ 25.97 _[ 2 5 . 9 7 _[ 2 5 . 9 7
J_ 25.97 _[25.97 J_25.97
_[ 56821 J. 55688 J_ 5 3 5 4 3
1120 J.9G I60
J_0.25. J_0.25 _[0.25
1 101.5 1117. G _[132.1
1 5 J_ 3 G _[ 1 . 9
1 1 1 . 1 J_ 4 8 . 3 J_ 2 . G
| 0.0000 J_ 0.0 OG 7 _[ 0.0005
| 0.0011 . J_ 0 . 0 0 5 2 J 0 . 0 0 0 4
j_ 0 . 4124 J_ 3 . 2053 J_ 0 . 2408
| ~0.~9l54 J[4.3004 J_ ^ . 3 2 •; 5
1 1 -1
I-^TO-— i-S-Tll^ i-^^rrr—
j
i
i
j.
i
!
!
!
!
:
!
!
i
!
•
I
•
I
* * *S . i' . P
tf i' , 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES UERCUR Y * * *
-------
' •"» O '"» n /
n / " -5
iu. £i .r- £i
TEST NO ~ N
PLAUT - I.M.C. PHOSPHATES BARTOH,
SOURCE - DRYER OUTLET STATION 11
TYPE OF PLANT - DICAL
COUTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED ~ FLUORIDES
PUIJS - 3
Dfltf.Y NUMBER
2 ) DA TE
3) TIME BEGAN
UPTIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, 11! HG
SV-IETEH ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, Hi H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COI1D, CUBIC FEET
6) AVER 'AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10)TOTAL H 20' COLLECTED, ML
ii)VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. t CU F'.
12) STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13)ASSUi!ED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
14) PER CENT C02
1DPERCEUT 111 •.'..-
1Q)PERCEUT EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULAI? HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2V)t-10LECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COUl
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), III H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEC F
24)/iVc; SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP* VEL H EAD )
2S)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2&)STACK PRESSURE, IN UG, ABSOLUTE
. 2T)STACK CAS VEL, STACK COND, F.P.M.
2Q)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
29) EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30~)STACK GAS FLOH RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
ZDL'ET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SA!-:PLINC NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
33) PER CENT ISOKINETIC
3H)FLUORIDE - HATER SOLUBLE, MG
3S')FLUORIDi. - TOTAL, MG
3B)FLUORIDI - HATER SOLUBLE, GR/SC.F
37)FLUORIDL - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3Q)F.LUORID: - HATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
33)FLUORIDL - TOTAL, CR/CF, STK CUD.
HO)FLUORIDE - HATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
HI) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, . LB/HOUR
H3)FLUORIDE - HATER SOL., LB /TON P20!> FED
i^)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/TON P205 FED
i 4- -
1 -3D
1 D 3M
J_ J5J3 0 r, c
1 £2 J
1 .5.2 .12.2
_!-. a_
1 -j.il.- 2
1 -5^
1 a c
1 4>U. °
i 2° ri
\ t; 2. K
^ 1 _^__
0 J_ J.£ . 0 c
_ 1 .3.0
i n ^a
° I ^n ou
1 £" °
ai 1 22 "'HG.
1
^-1
J_
1
!
!
1
1
1 97 ^ c - Jl ^ '•i ^ 5, J.''9.'7':1 J
Tl JL2 J2£i I 1 2. 1 1 I Q _ i r, 1
l__L8-,.2 _
i
i
1
1- - _
1 ia.^2
„ 1 za _
1
1 _ _
1
_ 1
1 a
i_28^u^ ,_l_2_a_a
l^o^aa L o - a
i 0.^67
1 152.4
1 olp3_"
1 28.65
J. 2150^4
J_ 44.67
JL 44.67
J_ G b 0 i! 3
1 112
i °- 25
J_ 1 0 4 . 4
J_ 0 . 6
J_ . 0 . 6
J_ 0. 0002
J_ 0.0002
_L o . o 001
J_ 0. 0001
J_ 0.08B7
i 0". 0 8 ti 7
1 _
i 0.0031
J_ n ^2_
1 15Ji_
L l.l£^.4_
_— J. 0 fc.-^ 3.
i 2215.
J_ 4 4 . F
^ . , V
J_ 6664
J_ 98
JL 0. 25
i 107-
JL
1
1 -
j_
i
1
U
i
1 •
1
1__ _
1 za
1 za
1
_ __ 1
1
_„ 1
._ __i a. _.
!
1
1
I
i
— JL
I
.5. l_2.P_^l,5__. 1
2 0 Qi 1
a. 1 o_, ^7-
t 1 1 5 f>
4_4_ L JLlLf JIPJL
. _ 1 0_, P. 3
.5.— 1 2JL 6 5
9 J. 2190^9
7 J44.T, 7
7 J. 4 4 . F 7
7 J. 64 7 34
1 70
J. ° • 2 5
3 JL10P.
10. 5
J_0. 5
_| 0 . 0002
1 0 . 0 0 Q o
_[0. 0001
_[ 0 . 0001
J_0. 1143
J_0. 1143
_ _ 1 _
j_o . 003 n
__.__.__
1
1
J_
1
"~!
j.
1
.1
!
i
i
1
I
I
!
_. —
***S.T
--+DRY, 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES HERCURY***
-------
IQURCE ££££ P.A.ZA
TEST no -
PLA 11T - I.M.C. FHOSPPATES
SOURCE - 111 LET STATIOIJ 77
TYPE OF PLANT - DICAL
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAUPLFD ~ FLUORIDES
HO OF RUi:S
PAR TOW, FLA.
- 3
DRUil iWMBER
2 ) DA TE
3)TIME BEGAN
END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, J/7 JIG
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IH H20
•7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COI1D, CUBIC FEET
8)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
S)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10)TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, l!L
1DVOL i!20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURl
1H)PER CENT CO 2
IG)PERCEI;T co
11) PER CENT 7/2
18)PERCENT EXCESS AIR
13)i-;OLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK
20)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK
".P. , CU
VOLUME-
PCT VOL
GAS,
GAS.
DRY
STK
21)5TACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), 177
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE,
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TE!tP*VEL HEAD)
2S)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
26)STACK PRESSURE, III HG, ABSOLUTE
27)STACK GAS
28)STACK ARE.
29 ^EFFECTIVE
30)5TACK GAS FLOW
31 )/•/£? TIKE OF TEL
VEL, STACK
, SO FEET
COED, F.P.M.
EA, SQUARE
RATE, S.T.P
'T, MINUTES
FEET
• SCFMD
32~)SAi-fPLII!G IWZZLE DIAMETER,
33)PERCENT ISOKIUETIC
11! CUES
3'4)FLUORIDE -
3G)FLUOR IDE
3T) FLUORIDE
3Q)FLUORIDE
SB)FLUORIDE
HO)FLUORIDE
HI )FLUORIDE
WATER SOLUBLE, I-1G
TOTAL, MG
WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
TOTAL, CR/SCF
WATtsR SOL. , GR/CF, STK
TOTAL, CR/CF, STK
WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
TOTAL, . •LB/HOUR
L __ l^JJ _____ L
i -LC
1
1
i __
1 JL "
_[
_ 1 „ _
„ _ 1 _
1
i o
1 3 • ?
1 _
1
1
_ 1
1 °
J_
1
1
1
5 ____ -~ ____ _J,__ ___
I_D
1
J
1 .1.2 liiij ___ l_J-^^lJiS ___ -Lii-LI-lii: ___ J
i_2JJ3jQ^a .L.22 09.^3 l_2£ll._3i
8 3A£ ____!_ °2 _______ 1 L__ __„
CUD.
CUD.
2oo3i_J.£. ooo3_ J.__
~ ""
-cr-
t43)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., LB/TOfJ P205 FED
1.
L
- TOTAL,
LB/TOli P20b FED
***S.T. P . <-
70 DEGREES
29.92 IS!CUES VERCURY***
-------
TEST UO -
P LA I'! T - I. M .C. PEGS PHA TES
•SOURCE - 111 LET STATION N
. TYPE OF PLANT - DICAL
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES
NO OT> pi/US
BARTOU, FLA.
- 3
1)RUN NUMBER
2) DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIME END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, Hi H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COND, CUBIC FEET
B) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10) TOTAL I! 20 COLLECTED, ML
11) VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU F'.
12) STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE,. PCT VOL
1H) PER CENT C02
1\>)PERCENT 02 -
. Id) PERCENT CO .
IT) PERCENT 112
18) PERCENT EXCESS AIR
13)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CON1.
21)STACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN H20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD)
2b)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
26)STACK PRESSURE, IN EG, ABSOLUTE
27 )S TACK GAS VEL, STACK COND, F.P.M.
2B)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
29) EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30)STACX GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31)NET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES .
32) SAMPLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
33) PER CENT ISOKINETIC
3H)FLUORIDE - WA TE R SOLUBLE, MG
35) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3d)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3'])FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3Q)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
39)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD.
HQ)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR •
^DFLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
H3)FLU01UDE - WATER SOL., LB/TOil P205 FED
i^)FLUORI!)E - TOTAL, LB/TON P205 FED
i_ ^ ___i_ _2 1- --
1 - j- ^ -i 3"" J. _L2_j_l!w5_ J. 1 ^ '
1 t^'"1"^ 1 -• i • •- -1 I 1 R •
J. i£\- -i -3X> J. 3^
1 1 1 -L. '18_ 1 I.* r
1 oj 'v? J. -£J1_ °J7J_ 1 4?
1 !Jr'-p i -Si F> 1 89
1 7 si o~ J. 6 ^ n 3_5 J_ 'i 1 .
1 1 r 0 ° 129
f j_ J_ _o K 1 J. 1 . "
1 _al ° 1 JL J i 3 • 2
1 _uT 1 -^ ? J. 3 . ?
1 i - 1 -
i 1 1 _
1 i __ _ JL
1 1 1 __
i D_ 1 o_ __ __1 o _
7j_ ,,_£ ,; J[ ? p lit; _[ 2 8 .
J..Q.2.B l°^qri _[ 0 . Q
1 JD "£ J. J. 0 r, 3 Q _[ 0 . 5
1 Jmn J. 137^.7 113?
1 J.0 "Ji2 1 J-5j.ri6 1 !3-
1 U " J 1 0^. '•• 3 i ° • p
i 2H 53 129.59 _[ 2 9 .
I »- I'o^ono l^ri*!
I O7^OO 1 f * (.} ~J \ £- \* JL,
1 12 £.3 i 19 • G 3 1 i9 •
1 IS £^ J_ 19. 63 1 ^9 •
i "-.5.2.511 1 379^3 J_ 334
1 120 1 96 _[ 72
1 0^2.2 1 0. 25 J_ 0 • ••
1 8 3 P 1 9 9 1 ^"9~.
1 18^.9 _[ 1. 3 _[ 0"
153. U J_ 3 4 J_^
J[ 0^0 037 _[ 0.000 3 J_^
1 0.0104 1 0.00 84 J_ 0"
10.0031 10.0003 1 °" .
J_O.OOP8 . _[ 0.0071 J_°"
_[ 1.4283 J_0.104 j_tT
14.0355 J_2.719 _|°"
i 1 - _ l_r
1 0. 1411 _l V. 0871 J_ f
U_ _ 1
'_5_/ 7 •> J
J5_ _ 1
_3j J_
J,
'9 i
p 0 ^ 1
J_
54 n _[
|
i7__ _ i
' i
; 1
1
1
1
. __ 1
1
,5 i
n i
61 J_
• 3 i
Z3^- 1
J
59 j
1.3 1
53 j_
6 3 j_
24 • ' _|
|
5 . j
4 j
. ___ J
|
_ J
, __. J
***S.'J.
~+DKY t 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES MERCURY***
-------
IQU&QIL
MI&
PLANT - I.M.C. PHOSPHATES
SOURCE - OUTLET STATIOU P
TYPE OF PLAUT - DICAL
COUTROL 'EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES
SO
BARTON, FLA.
- 3
1)RUN UUl'BER
2) DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIME END
5)BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, 111 HG
b)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20
DVOL DRY GAS, METER C011D, CUBIC FEET
8) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10) TOTAL 1110 COLLECTED, ML
11) VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S. T. P. , CU Fi
12) STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
14) PERCENT C02
1S)PERCENT 02
lb)PERCENT CO
17) PER CENT N2 . '
18) PERCENT EXCESS AIR
19) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COIH
21) STACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY .
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN 1120
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE , DEC F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD)
25)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2G)STACK PRESSURE, IN HG, ABSOLUTE
2DSTACK CAS VEL, STACK COND, F.P.M.
28)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
29)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30) STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31)NET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SAMPLINC NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
33) PERCENT ISOKINETIC .
3H) FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
.3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3&)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
37) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
38)FL UORID E - WA TER SOL. , GR/CF, S TK CUD.
3V)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD.
HO) FLUOR IDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/UOUR
1 1 ) FL UORID E - TOT A L , LB /UO 11 R
H3)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., LB/TON P20lj FED
44) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/TON P205 FED
1 _ <
1 — lu_:
1 -If
1 m.
1 -Q_ n
1 JLLL,
1 -B.2-,
1 •""
1 -1P4
P 1 r
1 _L2_
1 JJJ-
j^
J^
1
jL
1 -Q
1 2.B-.
-1-2JZ-.
1 0 9
IDS
1 12'!
1 12
i o f>
120^
1 194
1 28^.
1 28.
1 418
_[ 120
10.2
1 '^ ° r-
12.2
12.2
1 ° • °
1 0 . 0
1 0 . 0
1 0-2.
1 o.i'
J^
1_° 'JL'
J_ 0~. 0 i
t. — 1 _& _ _«1 a.-
_if_5 L_4S.^u.g. L — LTuJJ;
_t^5 _1 1U-4.12. _ 1_ liujJLT
"" la°3. lor''
hlo 1 h 7 U.Q.Q. 1 3 7 <~- c
—r-«»»— _™™.1r.^. _ — _
^ l2po J.8'l_,o
^MJ.' 1 l'c ° 11 1 3("J PJ
r>_ 1 l£f S. 1 -L 1 n_i •"
' ^ 1 2 " a 1 5_x p ?•
1 la r- 1 i -_. -
1 1° 11°
_ 1 - - 1
1 - — —1-
1 -I'--
1 __ - 1
1 fl 1 °
Ps^ _[ 2£ P 5, 1 2 B . P 5
ss l.zi^aa, 1-22^1
i 1 0. ° !£ 1 0 . 9 T
J31 1 Q. "11 1 °- sli!-
" J_ 1 2 " _[ 1 2 U . 9
P2il 1 3-2. ^g.^ 1 12 . Li2
•3 1 o n 2. _[ 0 . r 3
5 1 28^5 1 20. 5
65. 1 IPP? "? 1 10-90.
27 128.27 _[2
-------
IMC DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
RUN 1
Flow: 9319 (DSCFM)
Fluorides:!.85 (#/hr)
Reactor-Granulator
Dryer
56821
0.92
45350
4.04
Cooler
Scrubber
Efficiency:95.9
15902
0.076
Scrubber
Efficiency:90.2
65093
0.09
Scrubber
Efficiency:95.3
41858
0.19
To Atmosphere
A
Stack
A
-------
IMC DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
RUN 2
Flow: 10402(DSCFM)
Flor1de:2.19 (#/hr)
Reactor-Granulator
55688
4.3
Dryer
Cooler
37953
2.7
Scrubber
Efficiency:93.6
K) 14636
0.140
Scrubber
Efficiency:
M ) 66647
Scrubber
Efficiency:92.6
39716
0.20
To Atonosphere
A
Stack
A
-------
IMC DICALCIUM PHOSPHATE
RUN 3
Flow: 1097KDSCFM)
Fluoride:3.43 (#/hr) ,
Reactor-Granulator
53543
0,33
Dryer
33424
Cooler
Scrubber
Efficiency:93.1
K) 14293
0.235
Scrubber
-^Efficiency: 66.7
M ) 64734
0.11
Scrubber
Efficiency:
P ; 40005
0.40
To Atmosphere
Stack
-------
APPENDIX B
Field Data
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE CHECK
PLANT J..MV.
STACK_
DATE
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp./g^°F8 Wet Bulb Temp./^°F, Dew Point Temp./#g°F.
Vapor Pressure of H20 @ DP 3*&& "Hg. Stack Pressure ^f* Jjf "Hg.
^^ -. ^k /^j^J^^i
Moisture Fraction $k/jg, , Dry Air Fraction ^» gg_"Hg.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Barometric Pressure @ Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP_
Volume of Condensate /»
Water Vapor Voluine @ STP
Moisture Fraction /)„ &<$>
Ft'
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading^
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled
Average Meter Temp 5^9
Average Orifice AH ^ ^^
> «».^ ((0 x* *s$
/*f Mi Psa. KS*
p t> £ft k&f '^* ff
/.a/2,
°F
"HO
Ft'
Ft'
Ft'
Ft"
"Hg
Dry Air Fraction
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE CHECK
PLANT X/rlU
If ,. H
DATE
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD!
Dry Bulb Temp./g|r_0F, Wet Bulb Temp.
Vapor Pressure of H20 @ DP 3Jj^ "Hg.
Moisture Fraction
3F, De\v Point Temp
Stack Pressure 2£
Dry Air Fraction
_"Hg.
"Hg;.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading__
Initial Dry Test Meter
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled
Average Meter Temp
Average Orifice AH I
"H2°
Barometric Pressure @ Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP _g j
Volume of Condensate
Water Vapor Volume @ STP
Moisture Fraction
ml
3
,3
"Hg
Ft'
Dry Air Fraction
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE CHECK
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp./g/j'F, Wet Bulb Temp,
Vapor Pressure of H20 @ DP % f*£.. "Hg.
j^» rfCd?
Moisture Fraction &t <& / ,
, Dew Point
Stack Pressure
Dry Air Fraction
"Hg .
"Hg.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled_
Average Meter Temp H^Ck
Average Orifice AH
"Of
Barometric Pressure @ Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP
Volume of Condensate ||_
Water Vapor Volume @ STP i
Moisture Fraction $,
'Ft
"Hg
Ft'
Ft'
Dry Air Fraction
-------
PRELIMINARY MO ISTORE CHECK
PLANT
STACK
DATE
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp.j^0FJ Wet Bulb Temp,
Vapor Pressure of-H20 @ DP ^S7 "Hg.
Moisture Fraction ^X, d?@> ,
°F, Dew Point Temp
Stack Pressure 2&
Dry Air Fraction ^L
°F.
"Hg.
"Hg.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Readingi
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled_
Average Meter Temp
Average Orifice AH
"H2°
Barometric Pressure @ Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP geO °7
Volume of Condensate /&«<3 ml
Water Vapor Volume @ STP_
Moisture Fraction
Ft"
'Ft
rt-
."Hg
Ft
Dry Air Fraction
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE CHECK
PLANT
STACK
DATE
//
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp./^°F, Wet Bulb Temp.
Vapor Pressure of HJD @ DP "Hg.
Moisture Fraction ,
°F, Dew Point Temp._ °F.
Stack Pressure jgf.Sf "Hg.
Dry Air Fraction
"Hg.
•METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading !
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled
Average Meter Temp
Average Orifice AH
HO
Barometric Pressure @ Orifice Meter _
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP 3» Z. i
Volume of Condensate /f O ml
Water Vapor Volume @ STP '_0_*_t.
Moisture Fraction O* I) 2.
Ft
'Ft
"Hg
Ff
Ff
Dry Air Fraction
-------
PRELIMINARY-MOISTURE CHECK
STACJ
DATE
ttjmlt
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp./g£_°F, Wet Bulb Temp.
Vapor Pressure of H20 @ DP 3* 9S "Hg.
Moisture Fraction £)*
_°F, Dew Point Temp.
Stack Pressure
F.
Dry Air Fraction
"Hg.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Readin,
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled_
Average Meter Temp
Average Orifice AH
"H20
Barometric Pressure @ Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP g^
Volume of Condensate ^7*
ml
Water Vapor Volume § STP
Moisture Fraction ^D
•Ft*
•Ft
"Hg
Ft
Ft"
Dry Air Fraction
-------
JLlNU '
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location ,_/ *-
Date 3- f4 - 72. Run No._
Time Start /^-/>° Time
/
/>
Sampling Time/Point '/tfw Cfo~htl~
DB /?4' °F, WBA?.j? °F, VF @ DP
Hg
Moist.ureNf^_%,FDA_
Barometric Press_3p "Hg, Stack
Weather /"A i K"
Temp.
,Gas Density Factor_
F, 1V/D
£
,W/S
Meter Box No.
Sample Box No,
Meter AH@ /.£<£ Pitot Corr. Factorc?* jv;
Nozzle Dia.j^_in., Probe Length ^>
Probe Heater Setting x-^ '"Ci
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter s^5.3_
Inside Area j£j
Height
in
Tt2
" ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading__|
Initial Gas Meter Reading^
» 7 f £?
ft3
ft3
Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel_
Silica Gel Container Nc
Orsat: C0?
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
9/
ml
m
Filter No.
Test Conducted by: _7T C,hf?afyo^m^.
Remarks:
7
rtfj i
f<~
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
#7
^
^f 3
•4
£
/
t>
Distance
from End
' of Port
(in..)
^ 1"
/ %Z
Z %2
5 %*£
J l/^
^- /4
^ •// ,
-7 '//A,
* f t I ^>
Clock
Time
&fSS£$S9Kf&&S$s*-
1-1 •-" .^
/ 2>
^/.^L
?/•"/.
•-' ••> ,-^
..->/--,-'*'•
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
^^^^^^
$•12,
/)-?.<*
&•<}?
&-3J
0-2'i •
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
'#•
v5"g
>.r
>.r
i-2L
Actual
•^
-5"^~
t,V'c/<-^/.
; '
!.'.'. «- ; :
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/ .5 <;
^-J"C?.'v-A>
.-/V
/^5~
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
$0
$0
&1
7^
9.$
Out
SI
$1
$>
<""' ;•""""
Cx -"
c> ,y
o /
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impisger
Test.
C°F)
•
:**"EKt»*^*v ^ ^--^
•gz
f?^
ffr-
t-1
""' j
Vacuum
Oil :
Sample-
Train
("Hg)
•«*,-• -»-./.... <
y ,-* ,'•"
/> 4 '
ir- r
":V -in
'", • '=
•^ * ' •'
?-L -'
•-" ' /:..!
/.T'tT
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/? 7
9
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
£> ^4-
B fa
/O %z
IZ ^
-zo 3#£
-? -7 :Z? X ,
^ £.-£> .'3'i
^. -%:.
^y / .-C-*
2 7 //^
2:^ •%:
^^ '%;
30 ^2
3/ E^2
5^ t
Clock
Time
i.f.f£
^MP
\
\ -••
\-
\
,,x
X •'•
• ' ..'
OTOT.**.
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
$$*?•?&$
s?f
s
/''
\
\ •
\
\
•
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
&*?$"
#'<"j
£ \3£>
ff-Sg'
&• io
6-3?
j-3i
/)',^'^L
<3> ^g
/}'2.&
^•^7
O*2$
(9* 2..^
a-P—*"---^
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
> 1*0.
!3i
--^
x\
v-
^--
x 'v
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
7^7
^•S'"
. ^
Out
ff?
^'"
^^.
Sample
Box
Temp,
\
^-\
«»«««.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
?c/
"-~-~. , ......
Vacuum
on "
Sample
Train
2-2,
s
1
1
1
I
• *
I
.
•
««««»««.«,«.;,,,, ,5:
;
!'
-------
Plant XAi^.
•n
'SOURCE' SAMPLING FIELD DATA' SHEET
Sampling Location •'' ,7"if •* }\c.f,f '/W -/
Date J" ~~ ?J$ ~ ?2~ Run No.
£L
Time Start }2~ ''/.f Time End \1> 1-1
Sampling Time/Point -.:'- >*•> • /./'/ •/.• > -; .'-
DB IS'I °F, WB//5" °F, VF @ DP
"Hg
Moisturej£_J;, FDA , Gas Density Factor
*' J t- / "'"JN*"-""-'"
Barometric Press_3£MHg, Stack Press ^'"Hg
We athe r
Temp. °F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. */ Meter Box No. "f
Pitot COIT. Factor;'.• >' ,'j>
ft
Nozzle Dia, xg_ in., Probe Length_
" --'/X— "V ~
Probe Heater Setting v;?* /£
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter ,;?3 in
Inside Area f't.2
Height ft
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading "*> 9 ^> .
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate in Impingers V
Moisture in Silica Gel 1W, "L ~ go ft
Silica Gel Container No./^tP/^ Filter '.
Orsat:
co2
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: TT
Remarks :
O
,.*j\;fr. -Vj > ,• <.? c •
7 ft3
ft3
ml •
gm •'
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
~-~~ /
.', .v 1
' Z.
<
^
^*
.•' --^
/ •)
:>
^
9
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
v
/•;?•.' ,
Clock
Time
/2-/tT
•?.-;>•
M77
I?.?/
I'fy"^
/• ' t >'
/2 -r:(/
/,5-f)/
/^'"
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) .
$*&-2.*/S
,M>
*"• .i-*"* -* *-i v'-
S '• c, * /) /
4 t' ' ^
t£Wt
ZLB-?
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
- - - •
&."O
tf,^Q
<%!•/
.•"' I -J '
• •'•*'/..-
7 -'./>"
."> «•* •/
^- >••/ •
&• $•&
<~-~;o •
Meter
Orifi
Press
(""IT
-, L "7
Calc/
_ ..
V r
- i
W ' d/-
,
ce
.Diff.
01
Actual
- — •
S'
.//
1 J. t
ir •-
\/
V
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
^.~~— -« — -
Hi
IM
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
f°F)
In
7-1
y<-
*>'
->/
->7
p-3
C/
Out
/-;
>;
•>y
?r
/ ^>
J" X
/''<-»
•>/,
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
— —
Last
Imp ings r
Temp «
(°F).
.... — ..
t-v
X
•>.'.»
*. )
^'S >»
' #
/,•;•
VaC lil (IT!
/ \ "••
Sample
Train
("HiV
*
'
•*- - 1
.'. i
*••>
-
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
10
u
/a ,
/? *-
;4
if
it '
/ s
/ /' • .
'/S
/?
£<9
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
JJ^'^
JiiOH* .
•) '\ ) i/jr
•L& '->•?£
?f^
2.7%
ZG't^W..
-„, t <•*} > *
// &*:*;>,
<> ? -fe-
,v> «..- ,;^ .
'
Clock .
Time
IZ&T
'l>£?
/'$&1
ti'h
/?£./
!$&>
'l$l$
,_•»«> ^
h^f-
(~\ .
F*f
•— — •
,
Gas Meter .
Reading
(ft3) ..
5>Xf
$s/> $
'$8 *>}•'•.
•
$$&>
->» / ,
/ /5 >.. t,^,j.^ ../>/
. f ' /•
Stack
Velocity
Head
. C"H20), . . ..
£>'£? -
6)'^
Lfr$1
0*$6 '
^^?:f
4LM.
<^£/> .
^^
, ^ ^ 4te
^o-ZS
— ....-_ —
Meter-
Orifice
Press iDiff.
. ...("H20)
Cal.
.»—~
-^
~ — ~-»-
^
Actual
. .<"
./
JSw
\
1 1
\y
.- — «~— .-
Stack Gas
Temp,
ra
_A>2 J
• : "
/£«?
-__^« „ ^
Gas Sample
Temp.§ Dry
Gas Meter
.. C°F) .
In
Sa
>?a
- 1- *>.
E":5"
" •.-J*j/ '"
V±.4
'. . * o
H;/
o,>
c > .•«»
<^«a
D /
,.''•%•.;.,•...
K>
.-«»«„««
Out
^f^
^^
->*:?
_£_Z_-,
'¥
>g
">&
>9
£O
•— >**.-.ej«:s™u..
Sample
. Box
Temp.
(°F)
w.,rtB,«w*™r*M»«-.«,,
Last
Impinger
Temp,-
(°F)
^
^ .
A? ^
,^ /
t
"^T""
S?c5
^'ti?
e/
«.wn*««.u,4l.4^Wj -M»,-^-J -.ifcto
Vacuum
on
Sample-
Train
C'Hg) .
-o ;->
£ *~.t ,~
•2-/
2>
?-0
"> •
i .*ctt± f
&^'-^ .-£, ,&*,
~"? *••*
f.*~ „>
._
'
,
.
r~ M "1
, I
:
J
!
!
i
^ i
._. ,.._.._.. |
/y ci c. c t=t
' *•*'
f-7'
-------
Plant
PkoSAjl/rfl
SOURCE 'SAMPLING FIELD DATA'SHEET
tf
Mat '1 Processing Rate
Sampling Lo
Date ///r
Time Start
" Mr"
cation j "~
J
jfrJeT
/?2- Run No, 3
1901 Tiji
ie End
^n
Sampling Time/Point 2^'^C^^. -J^^'/i/)
DB/Jf °F,
Moisture _£?
Barometric
Weather
Temp .
IVB //>~ °F,
VF @ DP
%,FDA , Gas Density
Press3ress "Hg
, w/s
Sample Box No. 7 Meter Box
Meter A H@ //
Nozzle Dia,
No, ^
£2. Pitot Corr. Facto^'^JS
/2- in, , Probe Length £ ft
Probe Heater Setting • VJT"-^'
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diamete
Inside Area
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
Clock
Tiune
;r £5 in
ft2
ft
Sketch of Stack
i
Final Gas Meter Reading ^^g* /
Initial Gas 1
Total Conden.
Moisture in *
Silica Gel C<
Orsat: C02
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
i
^feter Reading % % ' 2
sate in Impingers
Silica Gel .?'3<* - '£ / &
Dntainer I
t'- gm
to. 6 2.6 Filter Noe/^2^>4
Test Conducted By: J r ^'^Joou^^<=-
Remarks: //^
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) .
Stack
Velocity
Head
b
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
0u*r> *s~«L t
U-
f u
i>/V«-V <.
/ /, -^
/>t//77"~
'f /^^ ' ^"5 ^y
£ * ' //&^>sf- \* i iA\_ LI— *,
rapingsr on
emp, Samtil
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/
^
?
1
r
t
?
B
T
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
^''-twr^
J&2.
Z-2^2.
S&2.
4>4
?%
^^
*>4
to ?hL
Clock
Tiune
&OI
19-65
J?0f
izot
KOI
1? If
f/3
fir
^17
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) .
$W-32,4
10®'5
4$?,&
q/o-z
4 13. %
^1<7,0
fZA2
^2?.0
4^/. o
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
o-w
0*&3
n*f®
O'S?
0-5?
$-16
Or*?
(0-42
Meter
Orifi
Press
C'lTJ
L H2
Calc/
..
ce
.Diff.
01
Actual
.'T"
/
/
•
\
\ ;
y
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
IH
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
f°F
In
#
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
____/£_
/2~
• /?•
_/!__
i$-. ^~
/c •
f7 ••
/%•
11
20
Distance
from End
of Port-
(in)
/ z. %
-^°3j;
2-2-23f2.
2-3 ' *3
_^/__ (& r^t
/~*y • ^Lff^ 5.
2~^f
^ I -^f ^
£P%E
$/ 2>5^
^Z^
Clock
Time
/ 4~/'<7
/5£^/
/^"2.^
i?Z5
t%2-?
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) .. .
f> f, J
^ ^ 1 ' *?
A&A t y
^^f ^ s 5^-5~
75-$$$&d1%~/7tL
• ' L — 1-lt '
1
Stack
Velocity
Head
.C'H2Q). ..
0-4? .:
drt?
(2^1 1
£>*$?
tf-^.
£>-4l
•
Meter:
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. .C,'H20)
Cal.
Actual
j£-
i
1
Vv
Stack Gas
Temp,
/21
^
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
In
71
Z2.
^^
Out
^0
70
f£>
' Sample
Box
Tempi
Last
Impinger
Temp,-
?*?
IZ±Z
j>
-------
V-s-
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
6 6
Plant
Sampling Location '/<('—
Date 3 - /lr~ ~ 72. Run No,
/
Time Start Time End_
Sampling Time/Point /Q /?//// lyo/
3F. WB °F, VF @ DP
Hg
Moisture /£ §,EDA.
.Gas Density Fact or
Barometric PressSr "Hg, Stack
Weather Q( -n/y-.
Temp. 1°! °F, W/D
,w/s
Sample Box No, „!_ Meter Box No. ,,
Meter AH@ /', 7o Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle DiaJ^C in., Probe Length
Probe HeaterJSetting £>$
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter ^ 7
Inside Area_
Height
£t
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
^-f , i..i. — f— *^j •--*• - •—* * • .-.---.-----
Initial .Gas Meter Reading ggTZ 7$ ^
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel /.5, ,5
_mi— -
' /2'/,
Silica Gel Container No.^/9 Filter No.
Orsat: C02
02
CO
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by :
/. ,
Remarks:
ft
U><-t^. y&
f'» cAAt^B'
//
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
, - \
.. ..^^
;•- :-'7
- ,. -^
, -v
. *">
" ^
1 ^
(?
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
0 ' ,x''t|fr
/
3 '/*
' !*•
~* 'B
Q. -f/fi
(.> //.-
// ?:.:
/^ %
Clock
Time
D'tf
^'.t>$
\\_ i %
--> 'fi^
A / t". ^
3 'id
-i : o-y
Gas Meter
Reading.
(ft3)
&/5,7 ^
'-?r,?L
^-93- 1
-+.1'}, '3-
K^;'.f)
^'-/'-t
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/ -^
•fr4-]*W
-fr^ft/7
frfr-^-5l>,2d
X . ^le>
n,i6
(V, 2&
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
' ^
r
^ 7
( ^
/)
6^/
AJ26
.0;31
Actual
/'
^
^>
. ->.
6.^1
/S "•• iV1
U i <; ^
i:>.'3;>
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/^o
/>&
/^^>
i1 c> 0
IdO
/P-o
1^-0
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
c
&>
^0
Me
&/
^y
^\
Out
79
-;?
^9
¥/
^
•^!
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
^ •
-—
•
-. —
,"—•
^f-'1*'
Last
Impiq^r
Test
(°F)
9V
W
'nV
^
\A'
Vacuiu ;]
on
Sample/
Train
("Kg)
y£a
•' J
tf/.t
&l
J, a
a.,-}
*~s
«'> "~
-------
(Port and
(Traverse
Point No,
"7 ]
8
9-
ID
\ If
\ /Z-
Distance
from End
of. Port
(in)
30s//*
35 f/4-
38 %
4-1 7/6
43 z%z
^
Clock
Time
.>
*/;/*
*/:^
ej\ tf-
Qifc.
//i65
A^aS
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
$KL.$
trt&, I
$i*$
^n^
u5^h_l_.
Qo37^r
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
^v>£>
I...J „ &•- ^"
O, 9^-C
^,^3
i>, >^
Of>o
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
("H20)
Calc,
0^
G,£/e
'0.*/Q
0,34
O^^>
o.3/
Actual
0,W
&,
0.^1
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/^-o
/^O
/^O
/^o
; P.O
/ >0
Gas Sample
Temp .@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)'
In
W
f/
C-.-/
a '•••>•
W
gy
Out
w
^
K/
8/
W
^ IT/
Sample
Box.
Temp,
(°F)'
Vx"
. — -
_™~
_^
^— -
•
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
yif
^ / '
*7
^/
*5r/
rr
•
Vacuum
on "
Sample
Train
4-0
//!,.
^-i
^0
4/,Q
'/,£
;
-------
Plant
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD JDATA SHEET
Sampling Location /^~ ifea.C'j'ar - Q &T/Cf
Date -/$-
Run No.
Tijne Start
Time End
Sampling Time/Point_
SF, WB °F, VF @ DP
*> ("kt*/ z
Hg
Moisture/^ % , FDA _ , Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press ^"Hg, Stack
W/S
Tenp._yf7_°F, W/D
Sample Box No. ^ __ Meter Box No.
Meter AH@ /."^Q Pitot Corr. Factor
f «J^
Nozzle Dia,"S_ in,, Probe Length
ft
Probe Heater Setting _
Stack Dimensions: Ins.ide Diametery/ 3n
Inside Area ft?
Height ft
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container N
Orsat:
Filter No;
co2
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: Lt UJ'u tf/&
Remarks:
_ft5
ft5
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
31
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
f : 03
LULL
Gas Meter
Reading
. r
^
. a
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
&13
CLU3L
CU3-
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
_f'H00')
Calc, Actual
&
°j£
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
Gas Sample
Temp..@ Dry
Gas Meter
f°F)
In
1$.
Ja
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
C°F)
Last
Impin^r
Temp,
33.
Vaci.,: T:
or.
SOi!!}).: C
Tra:i
if
_a>.
4i
i
O.G/
77
^_
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
•J6
II
L___j£_
• •_
Distance
from End
of Port .
(in)
J&&
J&&L-
n«r^
•
Clock .
Time
£j£L\
Si \$
^A?_
1 - ' — H
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft?)--
•93? 5
*L& '" "";/
^» . 4 «•% ^SP
QU&.1 o
y
Meter-
Orifice
Press iDiff.
, ..,("H20). ,
Cal.
a*
o-5¥
6.^3
Actual
&W~"
tf.5^
ft«C5
Stack Gas
Temp,
C°F) '
lajf.
..
• a
-------
Plant
JjH£ 9A0^.A4> ' $at£t»»
ing Location /f*» fefltgra/*.jStetj
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location
Run No.
Time Start
Sampling
DB
Time End
WB
Moisture,^? %,FDA
•*7#
Barometric Press3O "Hg, Stack
Weather
Temp, &
_°F, VF @ DP "Hg
, Gas Density Factor
W/D
W/S
Sample Box No.
Meter AH@ /
Meter Box No.
Pitot Corr. Factor
^"» a ^iff,*
Nozzle Dia«_jjf_in., Probe Length_2__ft
Probe Heater Setting '
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter_
Inside Area
Height,
in
ft
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading_
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica
Silica Gel Container NO/&Q*& Filter
»**• • -f—
Orsat: C00
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
Remarks :
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press.Diff.
,01
Calc,
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.. @ Dry
Gas Meter
f°F
Sample
Box
Temp,
C°F)
Last
Impin^r
Temp.
Vacuisa
on
Sample
Train
("Hgi
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/£
//
/a-
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
4[^,
£/^M^
Ufa •
Clock ,
Time
f
MZL^
/^%_
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft?)
f*7o.. £?
9J&, 8
f/f^/f
Stack
Velocity
Head
Q.ZO •
O,/6
OJtz—
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. .,.CMH20) ..
Cal.
Q,*?
aw
0,33
Actual
^-H2_
&~tjtf*
JPJ&
Stack Gas
Temp,
TO
l$&
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter-
In
^5"
8^
^
•
Out
££.'
&&
j&2_
Sample
Bo/
Temp;
Last
Impinger
Tempi
g£
__££,
Vacuum
on
Sample-
Train
("Hg)
.,..., ,_„ _....
ft
¥ £%
Mll'__i£_ — ,
i
:
. , s
-
'
i
i
i
i
;
i
I
i
:
1
L, ,,. ...,(
_ i
i
I
j
I
!
-------
Il.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant ,J~ffihCr Tf-i$SPtff}T££ f PftKTQb)
Sampling Location*/."— jP/ftft/f- JUfc
Date 3— /4~ 72- Run No- - /'
£T
Time Start ^*&tb Time End £\ \p
Sampling TimQ/PoiTit/tf/nfaLT&fa/^/^^JffWs '
DB /^0°F, WB °F, VF @ DP
Moisture 2££>"o , FDA S?<9 ,Gas Density Factor "~
Barometric Press 3^"Hg, Stack Press'
Weather fti3if)& 8*-P6 .
Hg I' '
^'T^*
Temp, ^i^, W/D — ,W/S ^
Sanple Box No. ^* Meter Box No. £$
Meter t\ti@.jj*,fe£pitot Corr. Factor ^)- ^5
Nozzle Dia, >4j[ in. , Probe Length
* T
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter {S>^
Inside Area ' ±
Height jf0/e/ZffyVr#C>
ft
in
V
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers *J?\3 fe
Moisture in Silica Gel
ft5
^33 &*
§m
Silica Gel Container No,
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks :
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Di££.
C'H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Mpirger
Test
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
(MHg)
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity.
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff,
(MH20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp,@Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
i£
Mat'l Processing Rate
Sampling Location -J^^f^^ /^C^f^
Date ^3~ /-£?- "7 i2- Run No . c*—}
— " — " ' "" " J^'A -a*, '
Time Start /^2**JT$ Time End 2*0 3"
Sampling Time/Point _fx??^lv f //(^x^>u«./7^
DB °F5 WB °F, VF @'DP "Hg
Moisturec^ % , FDA/5% Gas Density Factor *— '
Barometric PressJg^J'Hg, Stack Pres^fHg'
Weather //v£l'>D& $*>U£Xsr'
Temp. V^7 °F, W/D -- , W/S — r
tf £? /;
Sample Box No. Meter Box No, /O
Meter AH@ /^fc?5' Pitot Corr. FactorQy_^3
Nozzle Dia. //^ in, , Probe Length 1*f ft
Jr ^•*^> *^X '
Probe Heater Setting ^$O/& :
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter /£*? in
T • i A * 7 ^>O/ ft
• Initial Gas Meter Reading J?^/ J2J2.7 ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel CLS t
^4";5 ml,,<
*-,3^s-3ot^__
Silica Gel Container No Jfltf^ Filter No/P^i/^^
Or sat: C00 ^> t
• CO . " -*
N9 #^
Excess
Air
Test Conducted. By: j^,, G& /t^/fy^
• .
/•^ f ff"
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
•ill
|%fU '
AjWf'Vft
' • //
n
- /•£.'
.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
'
Clock
Time
r ln
aiSS
S!
-------
Plant
/,., V ^
4&^-
SOURCE
DATA
> F'i #
Sampling Location_
Date 3- 'f-73
Run No.
3
Time Start ; 25 Time End LJ i 35
Sampling Time/Point^
°F,
.
DB
WB
F, VF @ DP
"Hg
vjk^fois tur^2£j,FDA ,Gas DensityFactor_
Barometric PressjJfifHg, Stack Press^Hg
Weather /V^->'A#£ £3 .D{~,
Temp. *7< °F, W/D —
W/S
//
ft
Sample Box No. Meter Box No.^./?
Meter AH@ rt.;i Pitot Corr. Factor^* #:$
i ,
Nozzle Dia, Hiin,, Probe Length
TT~^ «>, ,y~
Probe Heater Setting_ ^O/O
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area ~
Height
|in
+W-
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
ft3
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
^ *w i4j'* f
fkfcl1" '
|>**X'i**M
* • »
• //
/Z
i
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
-y
.
'
ClOCk :
Time
^I'-L-S
mjo
-JtiSu
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
9?3 »^
1 1 <*) ©••> y jj
*/7o' *7
4ftv5vl
, ,. ,, j W«"f ' -,'*'/ /r
-
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20). . . ,
4J±^
p/i/^
/i/O
tf
Meter
Orifice
Press. Biff.
. .,X"H2Q)
Cal.
>AS
2,!f
««•». «« jr
*±*Ss£.
Actual
^JUUL
[i,2j
- *> v*?1
«A. ' <£*,}
•
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
u_tl3_,
/»•* ^
/ " f S>
f ? ...«? . .
p2t3~Z]
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas • Meter
.. (°.F) .
In
T?
?1
^
» •
Out
^10
ye
9D
Sample
Box
Temp;
ra
cnffiacNB,
wssfflU'ra-
wo^en
Last
Impinger
Temp «•
(°F)
l&g
I/O
://0 \
-
'
Vacuum
• on
Sample
Train
("Hg) .
3^"<3
t ^
/•^^C'
tf IJ* >.-J
f Q 4 &.'
r I
_»___„.„
. i
"
!
u_. ....
_
|
. i
1
_. „.,,- i
i
-------
Plant
..J, II._
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location '/fl'~ Dfi?£R~'CsUTL&T
Date 3 If*/ 111- Run No, /
Time Start^. tyg Time End /&t'%'J
Sampling Time/Point/^/Ts (p 8^ //2 *^T6i
DB /£& °F, 1VB °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Mo i s tur e 25 1 , FDA . Gas Density F act or
Barometric Press 3* "Hg, Stack Press3-°*'-s*Hg^
Weather ,/>/€ '--oxv^
Temp. °F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No, ^r Meter Box No.
Meter AH@/,fo^ Pitot Corr. Factor 0, 83
Nozzle Dia.'/Y in., Probe Length -^ ft
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter QO»S in
Inside Area ft^
Height ft
" r
\# \ -
\j >
/ £0*4
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading_
Initial Gas Meter Reading ^5"ft 3 (£<$
df> d?*3 1
Total Condensate in Impingers ^i w\&
Moisture in Silica Gel
. O
Silica Gel Container No/O/V Filter
Orsat: C02_
02
CO
N2 .
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: (3. fl/fen
Remarks
: f/oul
ft3
_ft3
ml 3'
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
.from End
of Port
(in.)
2SL
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
• Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc. i Actual
a
Q.blP
fostf
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp. 8 Dry
Gas Meter
In
8L
8/
Out
8*-
Sam
Box
Te
~&
Last
linpirger
Test
C°F)
Vacuumi
on !
Sample I
Train
("Hg)
3,0
"3.8
3,2.
-------
S amble
Bok'
Teiip,
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End.
o£ Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff.
C"H20)
Gale.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
C
°F)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
Out
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
'ENVIRONMENTAL' ENGINEER!^ ,'
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant _%TAl' C' pl$Spl.c&S
Sampling Location tt/f" £>rVer" dtftlct
Date 3 1/5
'h^ Run No. ' *&-J
Time Start _/£,& O . Time End/4^ ^<3
Sampling Tii
DB^OJ °F,
Mcisture^O
Barometric !
Weather £
ie/Point/>^//#5 @ rf/rru^ <$O~bfa-
WB °F, VF @ DP "Hg
\ , FDA , Gas Density F act or
>ress50 "Hg,
>j£At>.
Stack Pr<
;SS;3%5"Hg
Temp. CF, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No, '/r Meter Box No. C-S"
Meter AH@/,^
^•/< /
7(5 Pitot Corr. Factor
o,83
Nozzle Dia. Us£ in. , Probe Length
7^55 */
y*>S'%
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
0,&& .
o< A 3
j^Jl>
o/^7
0,30
£ii3t
Mat'l Processing
Final Gas M
Initial Gas
Total Conde
Moisture in
Silica Gel
Orsat: C02
02
CO
Excess
Air
Rate
eter Reading ^
Meter Reading
77^, '^25" ft3
^/^A/^5" ft3
nsate in Impingers ^3
n£\
A 6 55
n>7o
oSti
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
/^a.
J5£*
1&S-*
]&$-
\%5
l&tf
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
-
77
77
11
' •< •
%'t>
Out
77
n
?7
1?
t tJ
Sai
B
3
&
fa
^
-------
port and
[Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head .
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp«@Dry
Gas Meter
ra
Sample
Box
Teitip,
fF)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-H--
i
--1
—i
__ '
__j
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
jfrrfer
Run No.
Time
St
tart
Time End
Sampling Time/Point
Py&S' °F, WB _ °F, W @ DP
Me i s ture£}/) _
Barometric Pre.4s3_OJ;Hg, Stack
Weather
Tenro.
"Hg
, Gas Density F act or
W/D
,W/S
Sample Box No .
Meter Box No
. w
Meter AH@/r(jgff Pi tot Corr. Factor #/
Nozzle Dia.lffi in. , Probe Length ff
Probe Heater Setting ' 0 A^
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter^0>€!> in
Inside Area ft2
Hei ght f.t
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading erf/ J
Initial Gas Meter Reading
£t3
Filter No.V2-
Total Condensate in Impingers / H /
Moisture in Silica Gel Q® 1 — /
—"-"•" —-••—•- - /•
Silica Gel Container N
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N*2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
I
£-
J
^
vfT
£
Distance
•from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
#*J5
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
7 7 i,^^-
77^.3
7-7^7, ,^
* '• t ^
77^7
?«2-J
7^v,G
7^7, 2j
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Q,*£
0,3.2
0,%5
0^3>
O.^o
0,35
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
Mf
d,s&
o£3$'
o,&sr
o,~s9>
o.k$
030.
0.76
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
]A
156
ISL
\$k>
)5k
l^
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
81
W
W
%y
W
95
Out
8f
gf
#f
f?^
^Y
0^
SaVnpyfe
Tanp,
^
&
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head ,
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Teimp.SDry
Gas Meter
Last
Irapinger
Temp,
°F)
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
1
_j
—I
-------
Plant
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Sampling Locat i on f j(l ^-~§C.r e <£ « M !/f *&0&£r
Date ^--/T" 7*^ Rlin N°» /
Time Start 1 5 IS~ Time End \^lS
Sampling Tirne/Point/^^ ^T^^t/^f^^ff^
D3 /^fe? °F, WB °F, VF @ DP . "Hg
•Moisture/b ?o,FDA .f^ ,Gas Density Fact or
T" ' • ' "'""
Barometric Press 3$"Hg, Stack Press^*5jf''Hg
feather &i£fr/L
Temp, $$ % W/D UJ ,W/S ^— ' fOl~*)f>A
Sample Box No, ^ Meter Box No.
Meter /jW^-
^^ ~0 gm l
Silica Gel Container No, /<30 Filter No -7^5^
Orsat: C07 - —
02 —
CO ' —
N? ^
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: ^f /^ CwfL£&ftf
/L /2frff./A?^Z-/
Remarks: /£? Jl/V/?///?*? pfe. '7f^€^l,'^ -2.71
L& 4 he o(-p&\£j*-iwd/ df' pr^.
V";''^-'..\r;»'
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/
/
^
5
-f
• &•
*72j£f&
O^oL
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
••-««-•
53
?.&
/ 6
I.I
/a^
Actual
\'
«-*-»«
^,3
*-*57 "^?
1 <5
/,/
l,2(e>
Stack Gas
Temp.
/
_mo
i
/4o
—i
^O
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
O^w
^^
H
g5
^
Out
<£Q
%4
%4-
ff^
^y
Sample
Box
Temp.
*K
~
_—
,
"
.-
Last
Impinge r
Test
*
1?-5~
'SS
8s
cS Cni5
cT1 s*-~^'
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
•;•- -SS-l . X-
„
-, *
• —
^—
-------
jPort and
(Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End .
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
C"H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp .§ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO*
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant /M£.
Sampling
Date
Run No.
Time Start
_Time End_/^2j{_
Sampling Time/Point
°F, WB _
F, VF § DP
'Hg
1,2%»FDAffi? , Gas Density Factor
Barometric Pressj§£>_"Hg, Stack
Weather &lJ;LQJ&.
Temp, <3^ °F, W/D_ ,W/S
? °F, W/D
Sample Box No,
Meter Box No.
Corr, Factor
Meter
Nozzle Dia. i^y in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside
Height
in
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
, 'Z Z.5" f t3 ..
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container N
Orsat: C07 "**
"
8m
Filter No f
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
£t
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
'of Port
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
• Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
TentD.
In
Out
Last
Impinge r
Test
Vacuu!i:i
on 1
Sajnple;
Train
("Hg)
^
/25J
l,5o
7,50
9-
13&L
0 f
/,&
/A
£2-
^5i2_
Z^£.
$3
0,35
1*3$
SI
Iff
o<4
1,33
[,B3
138
J/33
-------
|Port and.
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.SDry
Gas Meter
C°F)
Sample .
Box
Temp,
Last
Impinger
Temp/
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-------
SOURCE 'SAMPLING FIELD DATA 'SHEET
Plant J./YI.C. n\OSpi\zt£s' ]5A£TdtJ ,R/9.
L ' j
Sampling Location O/<£jf-/U ,<-?0a&R.J>
Sampling Ti
DB /Sg°F,
Moisture3i2
me/Point ^ /n**/p'c ( y"2.<^rv. j
WB °F, V^ @ DP" "Hg
-%,FM,f/fGas
Barometric Press 3'0"Hg,
Weather C—£ &/^-£_
( Density
Stack I
Factor
'ress "Hg
Temp. '^^"F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box
No. ^S Meter Box
No,
Meter AH@ /,<££* Pitot Corr. Factor S5
Nozzle Dia, ,2-vTino , Probe Lengt
Probe Heater Setting ^y
P
6
*z
x
i
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
(52/
1527
1539
[5^5
1 ^f
\ «*• ~£^^y
3 35 *-5 /
_[^ Sketch of Stack
T?'!!*^ JJJ* X'^
.^ _^j C^ tT"
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading ^/ff ^^^2> ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading & {& ff ( f / *? ft"
Total Condensate in Impingers 2.0 i^l^1^
Moisture in Silica Gel
/ gm
Silica Gel Container No. £255^ Filter No.7.2? ^T^
Orsat : C02
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: ^hlJUS^f^
Remarks :
\
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
-^92,O
v?7»S" i ^
?7 % 4/
^ ^<3^ ^2—
/
\M^L LL
2^
^
O<(o$ d >VO
c/^ Crc9
^? "7'c^
c?7 ;^"?
-5? ^7
9? 31
~<"ti <^ c'/
•-•• .- '.'- ' /
#.9 b"/
Sample
Box
Temp.
.» —
- — ...
...~. —
~._,
w- ~
„---
Last
Impin^pr
Temp,
<7O
V^
* c~
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C"Kg)
_— -
V;T.J '" " ) " ~* ""
*'-'' L^ /
f
^ (.''"•
~7£
7'S
-7 &
*r**-
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
!0
• u
U7-
Distance
from End
of Port .
(in)
\ ••
•
Clock .
Time
-JM£1
A-2/
;/v;?>
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3).
^W. 3
f67,/
*!i/i 0^
-.
Stack .
Velocity
Head
C"H20).
_il
JLJJP
o.^.o
'•
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
Cal.
6.t,'
,:/'/
' Sample
Box
Tempi
, >
, "
Last
Impinger
Temp.-
C°F)
- IB. „
70
Y//
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C'Hg)
— —
— ,
'
' j ;
__i
.
1
. _J i
;
,
[ TIT
i
1
|
1
1
1
1
-------
'AL LiNoJNEEivj.1,5, L^J
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
piant jOtf£. ffitefti/rres f3/i^m^
Sampling Location * f* *— CooLeR-QorLST
Date 3~/*
f"*~7Z> Run No. /
Time Start /4>^£* Time End /£ '**$£>
, /* / / />. '\
Sampling Time/Point/^ ffitft (7Br&/-f£& #w )
DB/£,Se'0F,
Moisture /,££,
KB — °F, W @ DP — ' "Hg
% , FDAA^^ . Gas Density Factor —
Barometric Press 3O"Hg,
Weather
Terjp.ffS" '
I*1
Stack Press20.5^'Hg
u3our«v^
;F, Vv/D • ,W/S £ACM
Sample Box No. ^t- Meter Box No. *«— —
Meter AH(a_//7_jM>itot Cor
Nozzle Dia.»j2S'in. , Pro
r. Factor
* g^
be Length $ ft
Probe Heater Setting O/\)
Stack Dimens ions : Ins ide
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
0J, /
z >
5
4
S
Q
Distance
.from End
of Port
(in.)
/%
£ ' yj^
^t^.
j^.
24%
4-7?$
Diameter ~/^%L in
Area ft^
ft
Clock
Time
14:45*
M'S"7
IS 1 0 $
M 1 \
/* 33
1^,45-
Gas Meter
Reading .
(ft3)
194*000
2ao>- 1
^o^r^
3-l%.*3
2\^« 3
2£& „ ^3
2^3, J"
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,23
'2?
.2$
! -3 5^
•33
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas M
Initial Gas
Total Conde
Moisture in
Silica Gel
Orsat: C07
02 .
CO
Excess
Air
ster Reading
&S^* ¥/&> ft"
Meter Reading /5^' OOO ^^
is ate in Impingers /^^> ^Y
Silica Gel
Container No
- /£
/• 0^ i'^
Remarks :
flrr$$Q
&e/&RQgy
•— ^
Stack Gas
Temp.
TO
.
/?£
/24
JP5*
/J?^
/ay
/a/
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
In Out
F^ g0
11 %1
^/ 8^
8^ B /
H^ ^Z
85 b^
Sample
Box
Temp.
/& fa
/ i^" T
fc-8' /
^g ^5*
7o #
'jS' £
7# j 7 !
>s/
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
7 '
8
9
10
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
£&%
£/£
&&.%&-
70.&.
.,
.
Clock
Time
ISlS1?
tk'.ay
JM2L,
/6,"33
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
£44*9
_^53f_l_
2S9 <
O ^
» ~
<&2*
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
/*y
7W\
l%*t
Gas Sample
Temp.gDry
Gas Meter
(°F) '
In
O
^¥
n^T
O*-'.
f/
fo
Out
&?**$>
o <&*
R3,
?3^
r^
•
Sample
Box
Temp,
c°Fr
^~
^_
^
/
/
(
\
/
/
/ •
/
/
A
^
/
/
1
\
\
\
i
i
/
Last
Impinger
Temp,
(°F)
1^0
r-3
8&
Stf
Vacuum
on 1
Sample
Train
j
$P s!^
/ ^
__ffi2_«<5
i
;
1
'
;
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Date
Time Start
Sampling Time/Point
WB
, FDA * 8S1, Gas Density Fact or -
Barometric Press30_"Hg, Stack Press2&S"Hg
Weather &[£(*_*> ^,~2^
W/D — ,W/S
Meter Box No.
Sample Box No.
Meter AHi§_^V_Pitot Corr. Factor *
Nozzle Dia.2j2ji5~in., Probe Length f 3
if ' •**
Probe Heater Setting '
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
in
tt2
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading g&o t
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica
ft3
Silica Gel Container No,
Orsat: C02
02
CO
No
Filter
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: /K
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/
2-
^
y
^
^
Distance
.from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
/£', 4U
/5>s5T/
/5:eo
/3.'OXL
/^; l^
te\ ^7
Gas Meter
Reading ,
(ft3)
Qbt.iTf'
£1,$^
£b8 , l
£73*^
&Jt .$
834 . (
in. i
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
.;?
.36"
~3&
-d^
.33
* 36
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
• 47
• ?b
1' &
(•of
1'^
-n
Actual
*17
tW
['16
I -.65
\
y*
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Q
'")
s
•**
i
Last
Impii^er
Test
(°F)
•
^»t y^™^*
tV
69
?$>
n
#?^i
Vacu.j-:i;
on j
Sample |
Train j
("Hg)
£ i
6 \
€
&
i
£> <
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
7
K
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
91
/&' \
Clock
Time
/J:j£
/?: .
^
5""
vS*.
'•
L -., _
• •
.
•
i
-------
1 >S&
f7 Gainesville, Florida
^ SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location ^r$~£j£sd ^P ~-\.
Date ^/x^/fe— Run No.
Time Start
Sampling Time/Point
Moisture/^I,FDA /y/^Gas Density Factc
Barometric Pres^O "Hg, Stack PressjffiS'Hg
Weather
Sample Box No,
Meter
Nozzle
Corr. Factor * <
n. , Probe Length
Q
Probe Heater Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
Mat'l Processing Rate _
Final Gas Meter Reading _
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate in Impingers_
Moisture in Silica Gel
ft^
YiJ.1-
Silica Gel Container No »
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
Filter No.
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
/
^
f
n
5
/o
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
I 6>~\ \ *~^
t **rt * I ****
/5f2z
15-; itf
/^/B6
jsiai,
Gas Meter
Reading .
.3o€'.3|£
^//, ^
315
,%7
I 'OS
h&?
\>0%
*1(4 r^^
Stack Gas
Temp.
/Z&
JL2-C
'
/2.S"
I 2^
I2.V
t ^^
Gas Sample
Temp.g Dry
Gas Meter
In
£3
^if
%Cf
^/cL
OLt
f^
Out
0
75
ff-3>
%*£
gi/
W~
Sample
Box
Temp.
^
t'
/
(
/
Last
Impinge r
Test
X3
Vacuum
on
.Sample
Train
("Kg)
6*3
sj£ | ^
_2D
*70
/' ^O
_3$
t
t
g .
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
r?
$
q
{&
.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
.
Clock
Time
&&7
JAL^L.
L/^jLL
f^'jt
- f
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
<32>£>* &,
33%, q
-5?^.
Stack
Velocity
Head.
C"H20)
s-^fl
*&5
-A3
• Q&J
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff.
("H20)
Calcc
^7
*5?- -VN
V 4» <&r*
-74
*7f
Actual
r§7
y
on
Sample
Train
"7 ^
^
Q «• ^ ' •
^
'
. — -jf
-------
rf C. nf
-------
Did)
MQ^SMfkJfe.
Run Mo,
A.
Da
Tl
we
V-oo
•5:00
S A VA 0 f m
-------
C
D i
EPA Sawple. Mo.
i
Run Mo.
Date.
TI
I (v.1 e
S A VA 0
»- ^ .t . ,.-
i^— -•*
"^ s
r --r
f
,„ - - - auSf*1! - — -
Po
-;.-;--;., ,_ „, ..^
f-i J
-v.Ji,.,
1
W "T-
s^«
' 1 .,
&,
.X-
• ;•;«•
" ';)
I-'
--r-
__ — - — -
c_
-^.^^^^rrt^*:1^™"'***^*
7.:^^
\^€C^C\£
\^(,to
o.AS
cf
^,
H->
.i-''J"
4^,
~L__
•% \sh U
^-.\G
T/\H\<- !
u t,°
o.^C \
,.,,«...,...,.„.<
!
*2- 0-v.As
-V V
A. ^ M o i.> r v •—
-------
•»&•*
1
OfC A/
EPA Sample, ftfo.
Ran Wo,
^
Dafc.
Tt
tvvsa
SevnP
—<•
£il
Point
'are °F
"~—— •nry*wfiirrrr~*F—va
o.So
0,9o
-3
Trace. Metals
to
\y, v c \
\ / t_ V, v-
-------
PUvrf
EPA S.
Ran Wo,
ate.
ivvie,
p_H
Mo.
in
Trace, A1e.1rA(s
3
-------
T/tfC "Dirat
EPA Sa
fcfe.
Rim Wo,
Dafc.
Tlv
i a
V- o o
A'-^o
Poin't1
£il
o.^o
Attt^ls
^
\-~**^~
-------
APPENDIX C
Standard Analytical Procedures
-------
Reply to
Ann of:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Date: 12-21-72
Subject: summary of Fluoride Analysis
7" •
"'
R." Neulicht, EMB, IRL
This memorandum is in response to your request for a brief
summary of our SPADNS-Zirconium Lake procedure; for determination
of fluoride in.stack emission samples.
Samples received in our laboratory are .filtered through
fluoride free paper filters to yield water soluble and water insoluble
portions. The water insoluble particulate collected on the filter
is rinsed throughly to be sure that all water soluble fluoride is
rinsed through. The water soluble fraction is distilled from sul-
furic acid to a maximum temperature of 180 C. If chloride is suspected
in the sample Ag_So is added to the still. SPADNS solution is added
to an aliquot of the distillate and the absorbance is read at 570 nm.
The concentration of the sample is determined from a calibration curve
prepared from standard fluoride solutions. It is very important that
the temperature of the samples be the same as that of the standards
.when absorbances are recorded.
The water insoluble fraction of the sample is evaporated to dry-
ness in the presence or a sj.urry 01 CAU,. and then lu^wJ wlLl* IvACII. The
fusate is dissolved with distilled water, neutralized with dilute H So.,
distilled and analyzed as described for the soluble portion.
Paper filters containing particulate are cut into small pieces,
suspended in a slurry of CAO,-evaporated to dryness and ashed prior
to the alkali fusion and .distillation.
If you have any questions about this procedure, let me know.
\
Howard L. Crist
Chief, Source Sample Analysis Section
SSFAB, QAEML
cc: R. E. Lee
-------
Phosphorous Pentoxide Determination
Colorimetric Molybdovanadophosphate Method
An aliquot of sample is hydrolyzed in the presence of HC1 and
UNO acids by boiling almost to dryness.
» . '
* •
The sample is cooled to room temperature, transferred to a
250 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water.
A 20 ml aliquot is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask, 20 ml
of molybdovanadate reagent is added and the flask is diluted to
volume. -
The absorbance of the yellow color is determined after ten min-
utes at 400 nm. The concentration of phosphorous pentoxide is de-
termined from a calibration curve prepared with standard solutions.
f
-------
APPENDIX D
Project Participants
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Robert Sholtes, Ph.D., P.E.
John Dollar
George Allen
Tony Arroyo
Tom Bel anger
John Chadbourne
Bob Durgan
Ron Fuller
Eric Johnson
Bob Maxwell
Buford Priritt
Jim Tscherfinger
A.L. Wilson
Larry Hurts
John Reynolds
Jerome Rom
Roy Neulicht
Project Director
Project Manager
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
EPA
EPA
EPA ••-•••.
------- |