72 - CI - 30
W. R. GRACE AND COMPANY
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
BARTOW, FLORIDA
JUNE 14 - 15, 1972
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
72 - CI - 30
W. R. GRACE AND COMPANY
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
BARTOW, FLORIDA
JUNE 14 - 15, 1972
Tests Conducted By:
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
Contract #68 - 02 - 0232 .
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures iii
List of Tables iii
Introduction 1
Summary of Results 1
Process Description 7
Process Operation 7
Location of Sampling Points 8
Sampling and Analytical Procedures 12
Appendix
A. Emission Calculations and Results
B. Field Data
C. Standard Analytical Procedures
D. Project Participants
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1. Schematic Flow Diagram 3
2. Port Location - Station K 9
3. Port Location - Station G 10
4. Port Location - Station I '11
5. Moisture Sampling Train T3
6. Fluoride Sampling Train 15
LIST OF TABLES
1. Summary of Results - Station K 4
2. Summary of Results - Station G 5
3. Summary of Results - Station I . . 6
m
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
Under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental
Engineering, Inc. conducted emission tests at the W. R. Grace and Company
phosphate works in Bartow, Florida. On June 14-15, 1972, three test runs
of approximately two hours each were conducted on W. R. Grace's granular triple
superphosphate process. The purpose of the tests was to obtain data for the
use of both the Industrial Studies Branch and the Performance Standards Branch
of the EPA.
Measurements were made for total fluorides at the outlet stack and at the
inlet ducts to the dryer and miscellaneous scrubbers. Grab samples of the
scrubbing liquids, the process reactants and the process products were analyzed
for fluoride and PgOg content. A schematic diagram of the sampling locations is
given in Figure 1.
Complete test results are given in Appendix A.
II. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The plant was operating under normal process conditions during all of the
test runs. Only one sampling problem was encountered; a thick layer of sediment
in the horizontal inlet ducts to the two scrubbers prevented the use of the lower
test port at each sampling station.
It should be noted that the emission data for the miscellaneous scrubber
inlet vary considerably. For first run, both the gas flow rate and the fluoride
concentrations are relatively high. The fluoride concentrations measured for run
-------
two are extremely low. No explanation for these irregularities could be con-
firmed.
A complete summary of stack gas conditions, emission concentrations and
system efficiency is given in Tables 1-3.
-------
co
From
Dryer
From
Misc.
Sources
Pond Water
v
(A)
Scrubber
To Pond
Pond Water
Scrubber
He)
To Pond
Pond Water
Cyclonic
Scrubber and
Demister
To Pond
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
W. R. GRACE AND COMPANY
To Atmosphere
Stack
Cj Stack Sample
Grab Sample
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
. FLUORIDES
STATION "K"
OUTLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P?, SCFM
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg- ,
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total , Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P20r Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
— , _._,_ 1 !- 1...... .1 —..I. -— — 1
1
6/14/72
. 30
30
2.9
121
109548
35.122
9.0
9.07
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
3.7
3.7
0.28
0.28
99.6
2
6/15/72
30
30
5.6
126
103555
34.629
6.7
6.7
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003 .
2.6
2.6
0,17
0.17
.98.7
3
6/15/72
30
30
6.3
127
102729
33.891
6.8
6.9
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
2.7
2.8
0.18
0.18
R9.3.
*.
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
..TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "G"
DRYER SCRUBBER INLET
•Run No. .
Date .'•' '
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P*, SCFM
"k
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total 5 mg -
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond..
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P20r Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
6/14/72
30
30
14.1
170
50255
41.347
5100
5116.7
1.90
1.91
1.38
1.38
819.7
822.4
61.0
61.2
— ^ -
2
6/15/72
30
30
14.5
180
52735
40.288
1200
1212.6
: 0.46
0.46
0.33
: 0.33 '
207.7
209.9
13.6
• 13.8
3
6/15/72
30
30
.13.1
184
54686
41.641
71
72.0
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
12.3
12.5
0.8
0.8
\Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION "I"
MISC. SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressures inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate & S.T.P?, SCFM
Vt
Volume of gas sampled @ S.T.P.
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P00r Fed.
C- O
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P00C Fed.
£ D
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
6/14/72
30
29.41
3.8
134
47858
64.386
392
472
0.094
0.113
0.079
0.095
38.5
46.3
2.9
3.4
—
2
6/15/72
30
29.41
2.2
138
32874
42.54
6.6
7.3
0.002.
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.7
0.7
0.04
0.05
—
3
6/15/72
30
29.41
3 -
134
33230
43.815
136
153.8
0.048
0.054
0.041
0.046
13.6
13.4
0.9
1.0
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
HI. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Phosphate rock is reacted with phosphoric acid as follows:
) + 4 HP0 + 3 H0 - ^3 Ca H
The reactor slurry, containing 46% ?2®5> 1S PumPec' to a
•granulator in which recycled material is added. The granules are
dryed, screened, and cooled before being conveyed to storage.
IV. PROCESS OPERATION
Operating conditions were normal for all three test runs.
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling sites and number of traverse points were
selected as per "Method I - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Sta-
tionary Sources, Part 60, Subchapter C, Chapter 1, Title 40," Federal
Register, No. 247-Pt. II-l.
Figures 2 through 4 are schematic diagrams of the stack
configurations near the sampling location, and the sampling points
traversed during the emission tests.
-------
COMMON STACK OUTLET
A'
4.
A
S
•0
2.0'
A
I.D.
33'
TRAVERSE
POINT MO.
1
2.
3
4-
5
G
7
8
9
(O
I 1
1Z
13
14-
DISTAMCE
FROM PORT
( 1 NCHGS)
1 3/8
4 7/16
1 \ 1/16
1 I 3/B
IS il/lG
^1
2S 5/!<3
49 7/IG
5T
G2 5/\G
6G 9/16
TO 1/4-
73 5Y!G
7G 3/S
FIGURE 2
-------
DRYER SCRUBBER INLET
-34'
--- •-»
' \
1 >
v^. .X
. ^ ~^v
' .
^•^ X
/ \
( ]
-~. *s
i
A
V
r
0
' ^
A'
o
3\ 1/2,
3
Z
J_
X
x
X
X
X
(t
A
X
X
X
X
X
X
A
X
TRAVERSE
POINT NO.
t
2
3
A-
5
DISTANCE
FROM POHT
f INCHES)
K
22
33
4-4-
55
FIGURE 3
-------
MISCELLANEOUS
SCRUBBER INLET
' \
\, /
,"~~^ i
1 /
x ^ '
1 /'
! \
! \
1
c 35
", • , K C
' IFLOW > «
- J - ^ t
-*,
D
j
j
•*
^<^ P,
A"
A'
i
-
i
1
c
C
c-
39 " * 30"
X X f,
A-A
FIGURE 4
TRAVERSE
POINT WO.
i
z
3
4-
DiSTANCE
FROM PORT
7 -:
I 5"
23
31
}/»<£
5/e
T / \<&
1/4-
-------
VII. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Preliminary Moisture Determination
The preliminary moisture content of the stack gases at each
sampling site was determined by Method 4 of the Federal Register
(Volume 36, Number 247, Part II, December 23, 1971).
The only significant difference between F.R. Method 4 and the
method used was the configuration of the sampling train (see Figure 5).
The sampling train used in these tests consisted of the first two midget
impingers with 5 grams of distilled-deionized water followed by two dry
midget impingers in place of a silica gel cartridge.
At sampling stations "G" and "K"5 the preliminary moisture
content was found by using wet and dry bulb thermometry.
After completing the moisture run, the total impinger liquid
plus, water rinsings of the probe tip through the fourth impinger were
placed in an 8 ounce polyethylene container. The samples were held by
EPA personnel for further analyses.
Field data sheets are contained in Appendix B.
B. Preliminary Velocity Determination
Method 2 of the above referenced Federal Register was used as
a guide in determining the preliminary stack gas velocity for each source
tested. The major difference was that only the maximum and minimum
velocity heads across each stack area were determined so that a proper
nozzle size could be selected. During each of the three fluoride
12
-------
Heated Glass Probe
Glass Connector
Ice Bath
Midget Impinger With
Midget Impinger With
Midget Impinger, Dry
Midget Impinger, Dry
Flexible Sample Line
Vacuum Gauge
Main Control Valve
By-Pass Control Valve-
Air Tight Vacuum Pump
Dry Test Meter
Thermometer
Calibrated Orifice
Inclined Manometer
S-Type Pi tot Tube
Figure 5
MOISTURE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
emission tests, velocity head readings were taken at points selected
by using Method 1 of the Federal Register.
Stack pressure and temperature measurements were also made
during the preliminary velocity determinations.
C. Sampling for Fluoride Emissions
The sampling procedure used for determining fluoride emissions
was similar to Method 5 of the Federal Register. The major difference
between the two methods was the configuration of the sampling train.
The sampling train described in the Federal Register has a heated box
containing the filter holder directly following the glass probe. The
sampling train used in these tests contained no heated box and the filter
holder was placed between the third and fourth impingers (between dry
impinger and silica gel impinger) to prevent sample carryover. Figure 6
is a schematic diagram of the sampling train used.
After the selection of the sampling site and the minimum number
of sampling points per Method 2 of the above "mentioned Federal Register,
three separate test runs were performed. For each run, the required
stack and sampling parameters were recorded on field data sheets. They
are included in Appendix B. Readings were taken at each traverse point
at least every five minutes, and when significant changes in stack para-
meters necessitated additional adjustments to maintain an isokinetic flow
rate. Nomographs were used to aid in the rapid adjustment of the sampling
rate. The traverse points were selected to maintain at least one inch
from the inner stack wall.
14
-------
X—
Stainless Steel Nozzle
Heated Glass Probe
Glass Connector
Ice Bath
19
Irvipin
T-,
ier
Inioir.ger with 100 ml
with 100 ml HO (Modified Tip) .
, . „ - ..-...-. .... :-LO (Standard Tip)
I:;;pinger, Dry (Modified Tip)
Inipinger with 180 grams Silica Gel (Modified Tip)
Filter Holder with No. 1 Whatman Filter
Thermometer . . •
Flexible.Sample Line
Vacuum Gauge
I-'.cin Control Valve
By-Pass Control Valve •
Air Tight Vacuum Pump
Dry Test Meter 17
Calibrated Orifice
T,-,
lined Manometer
S-Type Pi tot Tube
Figure 6
FLUORIDE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
After each run, the liquid volume in-the first three impingers
was measured volumetrically and the silica gel was reweighed. The im-
pinger liquid,, the filter, plus the water washings of the probe and other
sampling train components up to the silica gel were placed into a single
polyethylene container.
Field data sheets are included in Appendix B.
D. Liquid and Product Grab Samples
Periodically, during each test run, grab samples of the raw
materials, finished product, and scrubber liquid were taken, and the
temperature and pH were-determined at the site.
E. Laboratory Analysis Procedures
Water soluble fluorides were done by a sulfuric acid distilla-
tion followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD. Water insoluble
fluorides were first fused with NaOH followed by a sulfuric acid dis-
tillation then by the SPADNS-ZICRONIUM LAKE METHOD.
P205 analysis of the stack effluent was done by EPA personnel.
All other P?0r analyses were done by plant personnel.
For more details of exact method used, see Appendix C.
16
-------
APPENDIX
-------
APPENDIX A
Emission Calculations and Results
-------
E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE SHEET
PB - Barometric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
As - Stack area, sq. ft.
AS'- Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. ft.
NPTS - Number of traverse points where the pitot velocity head- was greater than zerc
TS - Stack temperature, °R
TM - Meter temperature, °R
H. - Average square root of velocity head, '/inches I^O
fcR - Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches H20
AN - Sampling nozzle area, square feet
CP - S-type pitot tube correction factor
VM - Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
VC - Condensate and silica gel increase in impringers, milliliters
Po .- Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, [PB +A H~] inches Hg
L 13.6]
STP - Standard conditions, dry, 70°F, 29.92 inches Hg
Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Moisture fraction of stack gas
Dry gas fraction
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (dry conditions)
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (stack conditions)
Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to air
Excess air, %
Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
Stack gas velocity, feet per minute
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (stack conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (dry conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (STP)
Percent isokinetic volume sampled (method described in Federal Register)
Total Sample Time (minutes)
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
VWV = (0.0474) x (VC)
VSTPD = (17.71 x (VM) x (PB + AH_ ) _r_ TM
13.6
VT « (VWV) + (VSTPD)
W = (VWV)-r-(VT)
FDA = (1.0) - (W)
FMOIST = Assumed moisture fraction
MD = (0.44 x % CO ) + (0.32 x % 02) + (0.28 x % N2) + (0.28 x % CO)
MS = (MD x FDA) + (18 x W)
GS = (MS)-J- (28.99)
EA = [(100) x (% 02 - ^f^)~] ~~ Qo.266 x % NZ) - (% 02 - %2CO) J
-: IJ = (174) x (CP) x (H) x '/(TS x 29.92~)~-(GS x PS)
QS = (U) x (AS)
QD == (QS) x (FDA)
QSTPD = (QD) x (—530_) x (PS)
. 29.92 TS .
PISO = (o.oo267 x VC x TS) + (PQ x TS x VM-i-TM) ~- (Time x U x PS x AN)
Fluoride Emissions:
MG = Milligrams of fluoride from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG) -~ VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF) -~ (TS)
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD)
P2^5 Fec* = T°r's/hour, determined from plant data '
Lbs/ton P20 Fed = (Ibs/hour) 4- (Tons/hour PoO. Fed)
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
S.QURCE ££££ ZMI4
TEST NO -
PLANT - W.R. GRACE G,T,S.P.
SOURCE - OUTLET K
TYPE OF PLANT - G.T.S.P.
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - Fluoride
NO Ov RUNS - 3
1)RUN NUMBER
2 ) DA TE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIUE END
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN EG
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN HG
7) VOL DRY CAS, METER C011D , CUBIC FEET
B)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE , DEG F
Q)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10)TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, I'L
11) VOL 1110 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU FL
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUl'E
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H) PER CENT CO 2
15)PERCENT 02
1C, ) PERCENT CO
17) PER CENT 7/2
IB) PERCENT EXCESS AIR
19)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CON I
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN H20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE , DEG F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP* VEL HEAD)
2 5) PI TOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2£)STACi: PRESSURE, IN HG , ABSOLUTE
27 )S TA CK GAS VEL , STA CK COND , F.P.fi.
2B)STACK AREA, SQ FEET
29)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET •
30) STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31)NET TIME OF TEST, -MI11VT.ES
32)SAi-:PLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
33) PERCENT ISOKINETIC
3'4)FLUORIDE- - WATER SOLUBLE, UG
3S)FLUORIDL' - TOTAL, MC -
36)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, . GR/SCF
37) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, ' GR/SCF
3B)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
39)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CND.
HO)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/UOVP
m)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
H3)FLUOfiIDE. ~ WATER SOL., LB/TON P201) FED
H^)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, ' LB/TON P205 FED
JL J_ _ 1 __? _
1~ UL^-T-O- - -L - 1 n • n n
1 on 1 Q.0
1 P ^r. J • • 0 _2!'
1 °J3 1 •" " J. 35 90°
J. RJ o J_ 8 0_, 6
1
_ 1
i
i
j
...l
J_ T s -1 0 ') _[ 3 If ^ GOO |
1 ? ° J. u 3^ 5
?J_ -' nil J_ 2^ 0-
1 ° ri 1 -^ G
J 'D 1 10 „_
1 _„ 1 „_
1-1
1 J.
1 J. —
1 o _ I o_
1 20^8 K J. 28^05
1 0 9 f 1 0 , 9 7
| 1 . 0 r> l j 1.0 3 1
J 1 20 9 _[ 126^1
J. 2 5^ 5 fi 3 J. 2'!- . 05 7
J. 0 . 8 3 J. 0.8 3
1 30 J. 30
1 37irul_ i 3547
i 33. 1-. _ i 33.1C_
J_- 3 3 . 1 H _[ 33.1 o
1
_!
_ 1
1
j.
j_
_ i
_ 1
_. i
1
1
1
j^
1
l
j_
l
J_ 109540 _[ 103555 _[
1 112 i 112
1 o--1-2;"1 i 0'115
1111.5 1 1 1 6 . 2
1 ° 1 6'7
i '] ' ° '? 1 "' ' ^
i 0-°2:^ 1 Ei^?_
1 °-on- ^ J °«°^_
J^ 0.0 0 3 5 [ '••> . U ' '' 2 -j
j^ 0 . 003:" J_ 0~. uon 5
l-iilill :l_Ji^.'l|liL
j^ i> . / 3 3 C J_ ••- . u !••'• -3
J-072T-"-- -j-crrmr
1 °-^p . _i ^^^
. i
_ „!_
1_
j_
j_
___!_
_[
1
- 1.
„_!_
j_
__„!_
_[
. 3_ 1
i
1^-09 1
3_n J.
094 !
3 a n a p. J
8 5 J7 1
3 3 . P 9 i J
-47.7 J
2 . 2 fi j
_R • 3 i
1
|
I
0 J
2 P. . R 5 J
JUL-J- 7 J
0.07
1 . o ?. i
1 2 F> . 9
2 1| . o o ,q
0. ?3
30
3 R 4 7 . 2
3 3 . i. P
~3"^ , 1 r
TT) 2 7 29
112
"0.1T'3 "'" "
TYC . "7
"" .T'
""."".
"0. "n^TIT
"0 . TTTSTTT
"". T!n7F
"0 . 17*17 ;
2.77TT-T
*' * ' ' ' '-'
U7T7T-r-~
ft. j..-7tr
***.<;. T. 2;. *~*-DKYt 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 INCNES '•lERCURY***
-------
TEST NO. . ' . . '• : ;
PLANT - W.R. GRACE, G.T.S.P. ':
SOURCE - STATION "G" DRYER SCRUBBER INLET
TYPE OF PLANT - G.T.S.P. .. :. . .
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - : •''•(•.-\.
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES.
NO. OF RUNS
2 ) £/, 2Y7
•3 ).2T.'..'3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
, -i/; HG
)!-JETER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, III HG
)VOL DRY CAS, METER COi/D, CUBIC FEET
)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. ., CUBIC FEET
) TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, l!L
)VOL ;!20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
)ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
)PERCEIiT C02
It; \ TJ * * .}f^'t'irn/^)'f)
O / / i-> iiU LJ li d. \J Z . . . . .
1 7 'i Y-* ^ V C "^ 'V 7* /•'? "
. 10 )PERCEi!T EXCESS AI'R - -.•'.'..
WWOLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
9 n v/o F :-' r /; r / ^ rv ••*' r nIJ v n P ^ v / r1 ^ /7 / <7 ^ T ?7
)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR •: .
'2b)STACK PRESSURE, Hi UG, ABSOLUTE
2DSTACK GAS VEL, STACK COUD, .F. P. //. •
2i])ST
29 )EF
1, SQ FEET
STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30)STACK GAS FL01S RATE, S.T.P. , SCFM'D
3i)!,'ET TI;-:E :OF TEST,MI1!UTES
32)SAi-:PLI,;C UOZZLi: DIAMETER, HlCilES
33)PERCENT ISOKII/ETIC .
3U)FLUORIDE - HATER SOLUBLE, UG
'35)FLUORTDE - TOTAL*' . MG
3G)FLUORIJ'E - HATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3DFLUORIDE - TOTAL, CR/SCF
3Q)FLUOL'IDE - HATER SOL., GR/CF, STK
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK C/V.O,
HO)FLL'ORIDE - HATER SOLUBLE, LB/UOUR
>\l)FLUORIPE - TOTAL, . . LB/UOUR
43)FLUORIDE
44)FLUORIDE
i-/A TER
TOTAL,,
SOL.
i_J^J.38_
j_"lh34"
j_]4277
i"__9J?iI
nL.l
i
i
i
.i__ll:_5J
iilloriF.
" I ~"8f."6"
1
"
30
J. 94
6.84" _[
14'. f j_
7.5 J
i
6.81
14.5
14.4
i 6.3
i 13.1
i 1°
.„ i _- -. .
.1
2f.32
J. __ 28.85
|__ 2 7.. 2 8
" "
___ i .27 42.
~
L.
28.8.5.
277 42
-425
180,4
J.
"
L'tl/TQ;'! P205 FED
LB/TOi: PIO'J FED
I 32.829
|_ 0.83
30
|_ 4874
[ 14.22
. 14.22
[ "5U255"
[ 120
j 0.125
1 1 '4 . 6
' Binn
5116.7
1 .qoq
j«^3ia_
,. 1.385
31". 71
^~BZ2^L—
61.04
61.23
J_ 35.141
i °-83
i -30
J 5224
[ 14.22
_ i .14-22 .
i 52735
i 120
_[ 0.125
10-6 . 2
l?nn
i?i? R
0.459^9
n AfiAA?
^JL-iZSJL^
0.3295
?07.7/
?nq.RR
13.648
13.790
i 36.164
1 0.83
| 30
[ 5362
1 . 14.22
J. 14.22
[ 54686
i 120-
[ 0.125
L_ 1Q5-9
71 0
7? n
n 026^8 •
0 QIRRp
0.01914
12 ^2^1
0.8132
0.8276
70 DEGREES F, '29.92 Il.'CHKS
-------
S.QURCE TEST DATA
TEST UO - '•'•'
PLAI1T - V. R. GP.ACF G.T.S.P.
SOURCE - MISC. scRunwn iiiLr,?
TYPE Op PLANT - G.T.S.P.
COUTROL EQUIPMJVTT - •
POLLUTA11TS SAMPLED - Fluoride
UO OF' RUnS - 3
1)RUN NUMBER
2) DATE
3)TIME. BEGAN
H)TIME END
5) BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, 1/7 EG
i __ -i „ 1 1 __ I -1 _
1 i ;. ~ •- J. o . i; o J_ 1 T • '-i n
1 1 r . Q r, J. 1 1 : S 0 X j- fl L° Q.
i 3 r' 1 30 i. 30
I
? |
I
!
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, III KG
7) VOL Z)/?J C/IS, METER COiJD, CUBIC FEET
%) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9)VOL W?y 6V1S, 5. P.P. , CUBIC FEET
10) TOTAL 7/2(7 COLLECTED, ML
1DVOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
12)5171/iC/i 'GAS "MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1^)PERCEUT C02
1S)PVXCEI1T 02
!G)PEnCEi;T CO
'iDPEXCiWT 1/2
lB)Ptil?CEiJT EXCESS AIR
1S)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS t DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), 1/7 7/20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP* VEL HEAD)
2S)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2G)STACK PRESSURE, Iti HG, ABSOLUTE
1__ £..££• ____ 1 __ Q.s.1 __ . ___ 1 __ .Q.JU_»_ ___ 1
J. __ ££,iil_™_l_ Jil JlL ____ L— ILLJLQ _____ I
1 oo"£ ___ j_ __ 32,._3_~_ 1__C_7_._3_ ]
l—S&ZmL—l-Jl-'L'JL^. ___ i_^L!JilJL__J
J. __ £ij_o ____ 1 __ ^s.1 ____ i— JIS-J: ______ 1
FT], __ o^Il ____ 1 __ Q..JLLI ___ I_J;_-JL3__ ___ J
1 __ 2^R__ __ _1 __ 2.J1_____I— 3 ____ . ____ J
]_ __ 2-.H-. ____ 1 __ 2— ____ __ 1—3 ___ —^ ____ -1
i _ „ _____ 1 ___ _ _ _i _____ _. ____ J
• il _______ 1«. ___ «_„__! __________ 1
J
21 )S TACK GAS VELt STACK COilD, F.P.H.
2Q)STACK AREA, SQ FEET .
2%)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
3Q)STACK GAS FLOV RATE, S.T.P
i__a _____ . __ 1 __ °
1 __ g!i^Q± ___ l__2JLJiJ_ __
STK C011D\, __ 2.2.^U3 ____ L—^JL-JLL ____ L
1 __ 0..90 __ __J. __ LJH_I__i
lI_tA.212._>_i_J_-_3Jl!1: ____ J
1 __ 134,0.., __ l_J_3JL?J____.i
j_ __ '±7^10.0. __ iJLvAL
1 __ 0 &.83__M__l
J. __ 2.0^41. ___ l^L:^: ____ 1
i __ '12.'11JI__1__L™L? ___ »_l
l^JL^JJL ____ l_JL'^-_ ____ 1
i __ a.. 1.3. ____ l_jb"\3 _ __ l
J
J
1
J
SCFMD
31)NET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SAi-fPLII1G NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
3 3 ) PERCENT ISOKIilETIC
3^)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
3S)FLUOHIDE - TOTAL, MG
WATER SOLUBLE, CR/SCF
TOTAL, GR/SCF
1_ j_2_o. ^_i_^^__,__i_ f^^
iIICCCIIIIIiIZ'ZIIIIIIlISICIIIII"
1
37)FLUORIDt:;
30)FLUORIDE
39)FLUOXIDE
HQ)FLUOXIDS
- WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD
__ -.-
-TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CIW. 1 __ (i^JiS±L--l- ''jZ^^I—l-t'---- _____
- WATER SOLUBLE, LB/UOUR i __ 3_L-JiH?__i_ J-I^Z^ ___ l_i^^^il^__.
- TOTAL, LB/UOUR l_JiJL'J;n:ir- 1_ 'J< J''l!! ___ i_~-l°'""rl-
"
U3 ^FLUORIDE
H'4)FLUOJiIVE.
J
i
WATER SOL . , LB /TO!! P20b
TOTAL, LK/TOl! P205
FED
***S.T.P
->-DRY , 70. DEGREES F, 29.92 INCHES MERCURY***
-------
SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
-------
To Atmosphere
Run # 1 Flow:
Fluoride:
Run # 2
Run # 3
Flow:
Fluoride:
47858
46.30
32874
0.74
33230
13.4
Scrubber
50255 (DSCFM)
.822.4 i(#/hr)
52735
'.209.9. J'
54686
12.5
Scrubber
Mist
Eliminator
G T S P
W. R. GRACE AND COMPANY
Flow:
Fluoride:
Stack
Efficiency: Run #1: 99.6
Run # 2: 98.7
Run # 3: : 89.3
109548
3.73
103555
2.64
102729
2.76
-------
APPENDIX B
Field Data
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE DETERMINATION
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURK niliCK
PLANT __
STACK^fegg,
DATE
& l.^^? / 0.
"Hg
Ft
Ft
Dry Air Fraction
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
ENUiffeERIJNG1, INC.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Sampling Location 3 779776/?
Date 6//7/7Z' Run No,
~ Dryer- Sos>Vs«r
jL
Time Start J_lf\5 O Time End
Sampling Time/Point_ 2i Pitot Corr, Factor
[•j ~~ • '•"
7SNozzle Dia.
i>in., Probe Length
JP^ y c?
•/1
.sef
' *^
4Q3
Stack Gas
Temp .
(°F)
/r/
/7o
/W
/&$
it*
Gas Sample
Temp . @ Diy
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
-\
nx
_ — . — j
i
vacu;.:;ii:
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
2
•pr~~
o
^
^«
4
— )
-------
Port -and
IT
raverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20) .
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
("H20)
Calc, Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp = @ Dry-
Gas Meter-
C°F)
In
Out
Sample
. "Box ...r
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
, S J_,t_
Wit
2 - /
-3
S
3S
3;-3 o
snob', g
T».
o
i /6
70
-&-
*23
Z2-
J^I^LLKL.
X,
o-
96
* •*«
|o
,.4.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant J.A /?.
G-T'3.
Sampling Location
Date £//5/7V:
Time Start '
Run No.
Time End /,/ ? r
Gas* Meter
In
Out
Sample
Bo^'
tlmp .
Last i Vacuum
Liipirger
Test Ss-.ple
Train
("Hg)
il
33
0
72«- -5
N
1 L
1L
IO\QI
2-75'
-7-5
/ *—
2.2-
/a 107
\
234-
.346
3
33
44
5"
f
-------
Port and
[Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) .
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc0
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In .
Out
Sample .
Box .,
Temp'! -
C°F)>
Last
Impinger
Temp,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
\t-4
-4
-Sf
3
3
33
SI.
/So
dj
Z
jLlli
Cf^. v*^»
b
o
8?
Z^L^S
-------
iiNUi
Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant /£/' K tey^^ &7^$ P
Samp 1 ing Location <5j4'^W>v-
•R/ *cy^^t«^
Area ft^
ft
Clock
Time
/3>!&T"
/^ ' ! I
*V--n
1^4
/^-. ^
\t'»3* -2.C1
f 4> « V/-J
^MrS
>^—
/Zcc**«~>
&/
•*» /
/
V
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
A7/»9
^*^- / C*^ ^/
f\ ^ j &
Ct~n& i
&} /^v' /
«^ o O - o
9> 5&15"
, Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/ * £
/A*"**
» «->
^ O
gi<3
9v.« 5V
#n *5
& ft^
^ ".j irf
nsate in Imp angers / ^^-O ml_ __
Silica Gel
Container No
*o g^i
4<^
Filter No .^2^3 i
Test Conducted by: ^friTHO A*
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Gale.
>2$
•£££
-J?^
'3-^
'31
* *j ^?
"*x J
Actual
* gpr* 2*
,^
fc?)*f
*33
*3?
^?
Remarks :
^,
M^5cW-c»H
Stack Gas
Temp,
/ 5?&
/2 b
/?&
/ S8
1 S'^
Gas Sample
Temp.§ Dry *
Gas Meter
In Out
G[Q Q(^
'Qf'2 €| "X
<312 O ',2
f ^ .^5
^3 f3
?J ^.3
Sample
T^fflp.
a-
&>
ji^
/•%
^
36
Last
Impirger-
Test
7?
*?g
y$
7/
^fS
_f 5^
VacuiDii!
on I
Sample1
Train ,
("Hg)
.'d
•d_
^
^*
^
jf^
-------
jPort and
[Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in) '
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
(MH20)
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp, @ Dry
Gas Meter
emp,
Last
Impinger
Temp,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
affftotr- a-MrtOt—Ajefr *-o
-------
:-^r^=yij .i.', .i k.U LUM
• SAMPLING FIELD DATA
/I.
Plant7" &RftC,& &-T&
Sampling Location /flr.^C- Sc &,*>&&€&. /fJU27
Date (^1
Time Start
&~72^ Run \0. j£r
/4 35"~ Time End /2O/n/o
Sampling Time/Point y\5"Vv-s/n
DB /2g oFj
Moistureg^
Barometric !
Weather °F, \-T @ DP ,^f767 "Hg
*I,FDA ,Gas DeasiLyFcCtor /
^ess30"Hg,
^5'/JZ7/
Stack Prc
;ss2^y/'Hg
Temp.fO °F, W/D ' 3i\r/S
Sample Box No.. Meter Box No.
Meter AH8/.7 Pitot Cor
Nozzle Dia. /£ in. , Pro
Prcte Heater Setting
St-?ck Dimensions: Inside
• Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
(f
&t
£A.(*~
sPlV^
h^— -p
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
1 /3//k
--!/
•>
/ s %
ff!
"
r. Factor
,g3
be Length <£ ft
^O7&'
Diameter 3cfK~3t}in
Area ft^
ft
•v..--'"
Clock
Time
5"
/£>
/5"
2,0
25"
30
•^^>/i5
/»
i.
^ ^
^0?
?
Gas Meter
Reading
"7%%*&*
7
4/O-
4-0
4-8
"
Mnt'l Processing Rate
Final Gas M
Initial Gas
Total Conde
Moisture in
Silica Gel
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N2
Excess
Air
jtcr Reading ^ S"«3, 5*5*" ^
Meter Reading "2^4, / ^"
isate in Impingers -^ ^2L mi
Silica Gel
Container No
P3/-2. -A/Z.O s^=
Filter No. 7^*
Test Conducted by: ^A//=*C^- faJftyLQfc
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
,SL
/ f i
»?/
_t5^
;^^
-r?^
Actual
,*/
,g/
*^3
r/??
Remarks :
Stack Gas
Temp .
TO
/3$
/37
/ 3$
/3 ^
/3£~
Ttmp.Q Dry
Gas Meter
In Out
?2- _9_^
?7- 9V
TV 9^
9^> 8"?
7o ^?
9£> ??
Sample
Box
Temp .
Las t
Test
53,5"
%S"
% £*-
\%4~
^f~
^"t3
i , ~?
on
Saj'iule
Train
t'g j
ft
-------
-------
J HN^JERL^ ,"1 INC.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
HS MICA L,
Sampling Location
Date g&
Run No.
Time Start
£~Q Time End
Sampling Time/Point
> WB_J?60F, VF @ DP
"Hg
Moisture 3 %, FDA °f] , Gas Density Factor /_
Barometric Press3<3 "Hg, Stack
We a the r P- L Q U £>'"/
Temp. $2U °F, W/D ,W/S
Meter Box No.
Sample Box No.
Meter AH9 f^OPitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia._J_Q in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area ]
Height
n
Tt2
" ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel_
Silica Gel Container No
Orsat: C02
02
CO
, 37
ml
Filter No.
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by : S f
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
• w f
H
•p /
*? irf ^
'l'f^ (
0
tzr^
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
7^
, r'5! 2
(5 ^
Clock
Time
r
/O
/<
z^
ar
30
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
%5+» 4o
%S£l. $2-
^5-7, Z3
vtrz.io
VbOrfO
&Z..4-7
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/./
;./
/./
A*
A 6
/.£
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
.AT
,zr
vzr
,37
.3?
^37
Actual
.2,r
^r
••Z^
^37
.37
,37
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/42.
/f- 2,
/f-r
}4-r
1*1
111
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
^^
^Z,
^7-
ZT-
?2~
*L-
Out
8 o
So
%o
go
%r>
&
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
92-
fr^
r^
9ft
%/
*/
Vacuiun
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
4
t>
k
•r"- gS
jf
cT^
-------
jPort and
iraverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port '
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
Calc,
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F).
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuam |
on • "1
Sample
Train
fo
L
F/
5
X-
Bl 74
39
/ 3 r
« 3,, 2-
hi
,33
84
SI
.33
S- '
251
A.
,33
%4
->
r
» O
/3s™
S'f
T
W-C™. >* 'S-
.45*1
IT
/
3
fo
sri
rfr
f
1 0
/ 5*"
,5";
r
Si. 3
57
.5V
/3
•
(3.3.
-srl
-------
(jainesviile, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
*PC,r
Sampling Location /'7/5f .
Date
AT'-"?? Run No.
Time Start / >? ^ ^
Sampling Time/Point
/ 7 9'
Time End
/ .T" ^ ,
/ C '"
/' /£-C)
DB
WB
VF.@ DP
f 7* 7.. "Hg
Moisture 3 %,FDA
,Gas Density Fact or
"Hg, Stack Pres/
Barometric Press^
Weather
Temp. $ ty°F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No.
Meter &H@ hi Pi tot Corr. Factor . frj
Nozzle Dia._Vj9_in., Probe Length ($ ft
Probe Heater Setting
\*-' x A/
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter 3 /* A.? o in
Inside Area "Ft2
Height ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading •
Initial Gas Meter Reading k
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel'' "!-\-
£t3
ml
Silica Gel Container No,_£_
Orsat: C02
02
CO __^^____
N'2
' . . i - i'3. I gn
Filter No.' Vn<
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: ^ ,
/7
/ 7
Out
^r
rr
f r
§5*
^r
l ir
Sample
Box
Temo.
re
Last
Impii'ger
Test
(°F)
7-f
7^/
7 f
7-)
^ f
75"
Vacuuinj
on |
Sanple
Train
("Hg)
^"v
Jfi*
c>
,r
• *
.••' '
**>**
0
-------
Port ^d
Traverse
Point No,
-, (
D I
(
/
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
7. ^V»k
•
4, ] 31 74.
/
• «w
X
/ 1
(
i
/
2 r
i
/-
i )
(
r
4 ^
• I
-/ / .?/
/ //<,
i «» . -5"/;5
/ „ J f £2>
a 3 *y, ^
'3/ 74-
Clock
Time
j?r
4- O
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
0.>-i & I 3
/ x.-^ £' > is-." *«^
•~?/c; ./ o
4v
'/.O&~
// 0
//jr
/&£
O/.q .ytA
//\J, fi w
1 / 3cf
,33
•• 33
^-?
St €"
« *-f t->
Sf /**-'
» fc/4
^r"
/ f si
••s*;
,57
*s -#
/ ,,r <;-
Actual
, 4_/_
' ,41
/4D
>39
. E "i
z ^
f •,!• i
•3 'i
k 2, -
^ =*'
.,1 1*,,.
, •*•? ^
.-^ .Hi*'-''
,.^-fe
, 4 s"
*.^ /
, T) /
,.'•-'• 1
f ,i I
, 5V
.rf
: A 4»-
*-»• ,'/
, ,3 >X,
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
/34
/3 4-
/ 3 f •
13A
/ 3 2,
/ 3 1.
/3xL
/3-L
/^ :',
/ vi if /?
/•^ ^
Jb ^
/ o;' ^
/ .? r'
/,xr
y 3 ,r"
134*
/ '••' -S
/ ,..) T
/ 3 4-"
Gas Sample
Temp. § Dry
Gas Meter.
(°F) •'
In
tffe'
r6
9C
?4
I'4
f6
c5^
^6
.^4
t * fe**
1: f
87
a 7
2?7
S?7
/7
^7
Sanple
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
77
77
77
11
7 T
rf- ^
77
77
77
7?
71
!%•
7B
7&
7g
77
77
77
Vacu'om
t*
on
Sample
Train
^'_J
*£"". "
/-^
'a.'
/"
4
^~" '
*,?
.
3-
i
-------
'lant
uainesviiie, txui'ida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
cc
K;
ampling Location
ate h'-fty ""
ime Start 2L''3o Time End •£/'
Run No.
ampling Time/Point
-£3 ffou
WB//3 °F, VF @ DP
"Hg
io i s ture J6 \, FDA , Gas Density F act or
Jarometric Press J50_"Hg, Stack Press 3 Q "Hg
feather £, \
Tem .
, W/D
,W/£?
Sample Box No,
Meter Box No.
'Meter AH@ /> £% Pilot Corr. Factor_
Nozzle Dia._J/g_in., Probe Length_
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area gg.
Height
,
tt2
£t
/
O
30
$9
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading ~J 2. S- "7 4 "7
Initial Gas Meter Reading LJ?
Total Condensate in Impingers_
Moisture in Silica Gel
ml
~J_
Silica Gel Container No. &G% Filter No.7^>5^?
Orsat: C02 '
02
CO
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
••r^t
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of 'Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
230
Gas Meter
Reading
Stack
Velo'city
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
TO
Last
Impiiger
Test
TO
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
V
•j3JL
,2-S'
570
y
JooJ
I/O
/2L0
$7
7
7*}*
-------
.\
"'*
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
?
9
J0
//
/2L
;3
;4
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
4^ 7/fc
5-7
£ 2- 3k
U*//£
TOW
-JZi3i6-
7£%
/'
•
Clock
Time
3:3^
.5:^2-
5:^o
3^?
%.0>
1 ,.2.0
/,^a
-
^
Meter .
Orifice
Press. Diff,
("H20)
Gale, i Actual
,3.0
»r"z-
^S'
/z#
,&Z
,-z-f
* 2^g
,-aid
r^^-
, ^
,2-^
.zff
/^
,2^g
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
) 2-«^
—
/2^
^-
—
/3^
/2.4
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
in
££
^4
g'7
?6
^
F?
^7
Out
§^7
8-7
Sr?
8-7
?7
9"?
£7
Sample
Box
Temp.
ra
«««
-.
«wn»
tnM»
_
*»^""
•WW
Last
Inipinger
Temp .
(°F)
?«"
fW«
£6
*.
—
72.
9/
Vacuum |
on "'
Sample
Train
**5T
¥,c
¥,o
^.o
4,o
^6
4. a
,
.
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING fr'&LD DATA SHEET
Plant _ _C&&euc.
Sampling Location /< QiJTL.&T'
Date 6~/-S"~72- Run No.'. 2-
Time Start tO[oo Time End /27ST2-
Sampling Time/Point fiVoiv^ #^? /^/&Jee& "
DB/Z4°F,
Moisture /Q
Barometric
Weather (
WB °F, .VF @ DP "Hg
%5FDA ,Gas Density Factor
Press gg, "Hg,
«fc f\
jt_J£t4 &!*'**'* C.J
Stack PressS^'Hg
^j.^^W-nSSiL^.a
Temp. §b^ °F} W/D . , W/S
Sample Box
•MsterAHS /
No.' — Meter Box
No. 5"
,.4^ Pitot Corr. Factor OST3
Nozzle Dia. J/f in. , Probe Length §* ft
T
Probe Heater Setting i
Stack Dimensions : Inside
Inside
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.%
/
Z~
3.
•#-
£
&
7
8?
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
^
/
4
V
y
M
,
3,0
1 Diametc
1 Area 3
% <
sr 7 ^ in
»3.,/S-3ft2
ij* wS^ i
Clock
Time
llTa ''firfij
/|TI* f\Tf
i f J%. v Q
^.'/6 _.
(0:2.^
/£>.r32-
/oiy-o
/to:4g
IQ\&IO
ir.ot
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading ~? & I ^
Initial Gas Meter Reading "J 2-4? „*.
1% + ft
> >5" ft
Tptal Condensate in Impingers 3fS n"-
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container I
Orsat: C02
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
».5
gm
*fo'£&l Filter No.^cj*
fi
1 i
Test Conducted By: ET//X
. j> Remarks:
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
7zg,. ^
7S/, /
733, %
7 3>^>- ¥
7S7..0
7W .5"
7^ ^. 6
7^6, 3
Stack
Velocity '
Head
CnH20)
^^o
/»/<5
/. 2^>
/»J <5
A/0
/,/ C>
j/J 0
6*1 '^
]£
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
p-iun
Calc.^f Actual
^?
~*
I L_
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
\j3-S i*i£ uS A
r°p
In Out
7? 2?
7? 79
&<9 g-^
^O g'O
-^d) ^
^o 5*/
-F1/ -?/
$? ^>?
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
—
—
4KHDR*
.»—
-**.
t="
«r- '
;'
Last
Impin^r
Teiip.
—
••no—
' —
-
—
«™
f1^
•^5T
•-^o •
Vac i,
Sa-i -
Tiai
#<
ST;
<;.-
6" d
57 i
5"i
5T^
a-
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
' 7 '
to''
n
. /2~
•13
Jf '
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Jlli^
!l \ze>
//:2§
ft XL
tlM
\\\*i
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
L__J?5dvj9 .
753,5"
•/ O *P * *•-
7 5"?, f
76/4W-
. . .
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
.%*
L I o
i ',/ &
/.2.0
l-2-Q>
i,z®
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
. .("H20)
Cal,
»./y
,Z$7
,2,5"
,2-7
r'2->
,2,^
Actual
./*
(f Jo- 5,
,3Lr--
. 27
»i7
*T> *%
r a, y
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
/'SL^.'
/ V*2S: fe
— _„
I -•>• /
\ <&~ ^)
/ 2. "7
/_ ^L
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F) .
In j
*/
ti
SI
$1
&j
Q /»
«$•<•!
0 £-
Out
^ 1
^1
^1
^^*" ^
|g) CF«—
g'^
gz^
Sample
Box
Temp;
.(°F)
-»».
^~
*—
—
—
S5KST-
Last
Inpinger
Temp;
(°F)
J«
§o
g_
STC"
<5 v>
•*» //
0 T'
^
Vacuum
; on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
3/5
*&»
3- & \
^-^_4
3-S"
3-S"
J:i !
i
. 1
i
i
s
1
i
I
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant . Q-y ft,ss_e Time End % \ Q 1L--
^^^^^L^^Q^/^^n^
m °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Moisture /£> %,FDA .Gas Density Factor
Barometric
f~.
Sample 'Box
Meter AH5 /
Nozzle Dia,
Press_3O!IHg,
"F, W/K
Stack I
're^^O'Hcr
•*• ^'~t£lS*~f LL&
1 j
\'o. — Meter Box
^4S_ pitot c
)/
7
—
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
N
y
/
V
V
$
!
Clock
Time
t'ls
1,'Zi
/.'3 V-
r.vz
I'S'o
JL>'£%
2.',o£>
?.;W
No, S"
:tor O£3_
:h__f £t
•
-r_7_?__i^
^jjS3^^
jr f * *
Sketch of Stack
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading *7-*-»-> Moisture in Silica Gel
7, 7 gm
Silica Gel Container No. & of Filter No, ~J"2.®S
Or sat: CO,,
°2
CO
N2
Excess
Air
I
Test Conducted By: Er^K]""
a _S , Remarks :
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
7^3..
1*1 G
(>l O
/- /o
/. ^)<2>
1 , /O
,_/•/ °
,f^
—
f
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
f"H,01
Gale, Actual
,2.0 ,2,0
'^^ rZ5"
,2-S , ^-S
_jt_2,S ! .2-
»2-3~j»2-
S"
3
, 2^5" , 2. S'
,2-5" ,2S-
,^.| 2,/
.
/$£_
Stack Gas
Temp.
Z_2^_,
_~
/ 3- 7
/ £^£
—
/2,6
^^^
/^-7
Gas Sample
Terap.S Dry
Gas Meter
f°F
In
^S"
^_^>
$16
o tp
' $&
/ «*• '
^~" *r- S
^7 l^r-ti
\
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
cy
• lo
II
12,
/3
•>£ -,
"•••" i
Distance
from End
o£ Port
(in)
Clock
Time
2-:22-
2,;sa
2. «'3 8
a.Y4
a:5ff
3>i
Gas Meter
Reading
(£t3)
2 ©"2 'X
P-SjLufei
TflST?
2?£.£T
7^Lo
7W. 7 • . ..
7?£.3jo
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
-.9o
/../o '
1,10
l.t.o
12.0
1,2,0
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
•Cal,
»ay
,25-
*2-r
i/'Z-a
»z?
rX?
Actual
,^l
,25^
4.W
'.2.r
,2,7
'"27
Stack Gas
•Temp,
(°F)
/2-6.
•/2.JT
/2-^_
'/ 2-8
,_/^__
/a-^r
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
ra .
In
?^
t?
'*?
W
%%
$*
Out 1
#7
1??
W
^
3?
XI
Sample
Box
Temp,
C°F)
*_
_™»~
>~_,
_
•""i-mg
—
Last
Impinger
Temp;
C°F)
..„ ??
72--
to
?d)
.9^
?^
Vacuum
on
Sanple
Train
C'Hg)
3,5-
3,$~
3<.S"
3,5"
^"£1
55^'
r ..
1
-
i
•\
'!
i
_ :
__ T]
:
" " ^ 1
i
.- ... ,
1
-------
GRAB SAMPLE COLLECTION
-------
i__G
vi Wo. r
1
fci.'* Tfe
V 1
D er^ ur e
a
race
-------
Sz/'"5*
~^ ££,
a
-
G
G-.T.&.?
Ran Wo,-
L'
1
1
U5v
wie
I evn P
ure
GilVv
Oik
>t'r\ c
NCfi
a- s
race,
-------
^cvCo
Rim Mo.
1
1
°
Point
1 evn o er^T are N
\\0
, r
Tract - AUtals
s
-------
t
EPA a
Run Mo.
are,
^n
jm
. o.
F»
.r e
ental
--/ft/ O/?
z
\
' '
4
'T«_
2,1
-------
V
pwt.- d^ «•** /3^
EPA a
~T
Rim Mo.
X-
1 t
« JL,
•\\-4S
A.V
\.v
-------
G
A f
wo.
Run Wo.
ae.
<9 ( 'M
-------
• t
e, Fo.
v- « t M ^^ »
Run Wo,
<2.
3,
3
\
. 3
L-i>vC.(,A <-
cf, \
14,
1.1
i "
a s
^\&rks
-------
e_
G
-------
^n
/"?
&•-•
I ant
EPft S
un o.
3
are
1 •
•WWSWMTEJOOE^BB
f
-------
APPENDIX C
Standard Analytical Procedures
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to
Altn of: n ,
J ' •'.-• . . Da!c: 12-21-72
Subject: Summary of Fluoride Analysis - '
"T*
R.° Neulicht, EMB, IRL
This memorandum is in response to your request for a brief
summary of our SPADNS-Zirconium Lake procedure; for determination
of fluoride in.stack emission samples.
Samples received in our laboratory are filtered through
fluoride free paper filters to yield water soluble and water insoluble
portions. The water insoluble particulate collected on the filter
is rinsed throughly to be sure that all water soluble fluoride is
rinsed through. The water soluble fraction is distilled from sul-.
furic acid to a maximum temperature of 180 C. If chloride is suspected
in the sample Ag So , is'added to the still. SPADNS solution is added
to an aliquot of the distillate and the absorbance is read at 570 nm.
The concentration of the sample is determined from a calibration curve
prepared from standard fluoride solutions. It is very important that
the temperature of the samples be the same as that of the standards
.when absorbances are recorded.
.The water .insoluble fraction of. the sample .is evaporated to dry-
ness in the presence or a SJ.urry or CAU, and tliea lu^tou. wI.LL i;AC:i, Tlic
.fusate is dissolved with distilled water, neutralized with dilute H So ,
distilled and analyzed as described for the soluble portion.
Paper filters containing particulate are cut into small pieces,
suspended in a slurry of CAO, evaporated tp, dryness. and ashed prior
to the alkali fusion, and distillation. • , .
If you have any questions about this procedure, let me know.
^
Howard L. Crist
Chief, Source Sample Analysis Section
SSFAB, QAEKL
cc: R. E. Lee
-------
Phosphorous Pentoxide Determination
Colorimetric Molybdovanadophosphate Method
An aliquot of sample is hydrolyzed in the presence of HC1 and
f • f_ • .
HNO aci-ds by boiling almost to dryness. «
.".'..•• ' e
The sample is cooled to room temperature, transferred,, to a
250 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water.
A 20 ml aliquot is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask, 20 ml
of molybdovanadate reagent is added and the flask is diluted to
volume. . .
The absorbance of the yellow color is determined after ten min-
utes at 400 nm. The concentration of phosphorous pentoxide is de-
termined from a calibration curve prepared with standard solutions.
-------
APPENDIX D
Project Participants
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Name
Robert Sholtes, Ph.D. , P.E.
John Dollar, MS., E.I.T.
George Allen
Tony Arroyo
Bob Durgan
Marvin Hamlin
Eric Johnson
Bruce Levitt
Bob Maxwell
Steve Neck
Andy Taylor
Larry Wurts
Phillip York
Jerome Rom
Roy Neulicht
Title
Project Engineer
Project Manager
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
' EPA .
EPA
EPA
------- |