TEST NO, 72 - CI - 5A
BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC,
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
JANUARY 25-26, 1972
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC,
2324 SOUTHWEST 34 STREET
GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601
-------
TEST NO. 72 CI - 5A
BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC.
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE
January 25 - 26, 1972
Test Conducted by:
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
Contract No. CPA 70 - 82
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures ii
List of Tables ill
Introduction 1
Summary of Results 2
Process Description ' 12
Process Operation 12
Location of Sampling Points 13
Sampling and Analytical Procedures 22
Appendix
A. Emission Calculations and Results
B. Field Data
C. Standard Analytical Procedures
D. Project Participants - •
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
\
\.
1. Summary of Results - Station I 5
2. Summary of Results - Station J 6
3. Summary of Results - Station K 7
4. Summary of Results - Station L . 8
5. Summary of Results - Station M 9
6. Summary of Results - Station U 10
7, Summary of Results - Station V! H
8. Sampling Point Description ]4
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1. Flow Diagram and Sampling Station Locations 3
2. Port Location - Station I 15
3. Port Location - Station J 16
4. Port Location - Station K 17
5. Port Location - Station L 18
6. Port Location - Station M 19
7. Port Location - Station U 20
8. Port Location - Station W 21
Q. Moisture Sampling Train 25
10. Fluoride Sampling Train 26
_ 11
-------
INTRODUCTION
Under'the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Engineering, Inc. conducted emission tests at the Borden
Chemical phosphate works located in Piney Point, Florida. On January
25 and 26, 1972, three test runs of approximately two hours each were
conducted on Borden's granular triple superphosphate (GTSP) process.
The purpose of the tests was to obtain data for the use of both the
Industrial Studies Branch and the Performance Standards Branch of the
Environmental Protection Agency.
Each unit of the scrubbing system at the Borden Chemical plant
consists of a primary scrubber using weak phosphoric acid as the
scrubbing medium, followed by a tail gas scrubber using pond water as
the scrubbing medium (Figure 1).
In addition to measuring total fluorides at the outlet stack,
measurements were made in the inlet ducts of the reactor and dryer, and
cooler tail gas scrubbers. The outlet ducts of the reactor and dryer
tail gas scrubbers were also tested. The outlet of the cooler tail gas
scrubber could not be tested because of the configuration of the duct-
work. The plant alternately produces both diammonium phosphate and
triple superphosphate using the same equipment. While producing GTSP,
some of the off-gases from the dryer are diverted from the dryer tail
gas scrubber to the reactor tail gas scrubber. This by-pass stream
was also measured for fluorides. Grab samples of the scrubbing liquids,
-------
the process reactants and the process products were analyzed for fluoride
and PpOr content. A schematic flow diagram of the process operation and
the sampling locations is given in Figure 1.
Pertinent results of the tests are listed in Tables 1-7; com-
plete results are given in Appendix A.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The plant was operating under normal process conditions during
all of the test runs. However, a few deviations from standard procedure
occurred during the sampling and should be noted. 1) During the first
run at Station "K", the isokinetic sampling rate could not be maintained
and the nozzle size was therefore changed after the first 30 minutes of
the test run. 2) The physical characteristics of the sampling platform
at the outlet stack prevented traversing with the fluoride train. There-
fore, the fluoride sample at Station "U" was taken at one point only
(a complete velocity traverse was done before each test run). 3) En-
trained water caused a sampling problem in the "recycle" duct (station
11W"). Due to the entrained water, the moisture content of the gas at
this point was taken to be that of a saturated gas at the measured
stack temperature. Furthermore, to give more accurate readings, the
velocity traverse for this station was not performed at the sample point,
but was performed farther downstream.
A few other irregularities should be noted. The stack gas flow
rate for Run 1 at the dryer tail gas scrubber inlet (station "K") were
extremely high compared to the other two test runs. No explanation is
-------
TO ATMOSPIU-liE
A
(^ ^
\L/
(T)
'S
fi
TAIL CAS
SCRUBBER
© —
TAIL CAS
SCRUBBER
ROCK UNLOAD
DUST BAG
©
60
REACTOR
• SCRUBBER
Coi
>*i
Y
©
DRYER
SCRUBBER
u>
ROCK
STORAGE
I.
©
V
RIiACTOR
I A
©*
SCRUBHIiRS SUMP
CYCLONE
GRANULATOR
K3
^-A Stack Sample
) Grab Sample
FIGURE 1
GTSP FLOW DIAGRAM, BORDEN. Inc.
•s>(9
COOLER
SCRUBBER
7;
CYCLONi
f
JJKIEA
x^-
oi_i\i;i::\
CCOI.HR
LEGEND
1. Pond Water
2. To Pond
3. Surge Tank Acid
4. To Surge Tank
5. 30% of PpOc
6, 54% of P205
7. NH3
8. To DAP Storage
9. To Scrubbers Sump
10. To GTSP Storage
-------
available for this. Furthermore, the plant reports that the cooler
scrubber system was designed for a flow of 50,000 ACFM. In light of
this fact, the flows reported for the three test runs at the cooler
tail gas scrubber inlet (station "M") appear to be high, and may be
in error. The effect of high flow readings would be to bias the
"Ibs/hr" and "Ibs/ton P^Og fed" fluoride concentration on the high
side.
For a complete summary of the stack conditions and emission
levels for each test run, refer to Tables 1-7.
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY CF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION I
Reactor Tail Gas Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, nig
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P00.- Fed.
f, 0
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P205 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
j., — _... ., .... .1 i. . - » , .... - — .. i .1 „..— . i ., -,—-.-.— ».— - i i,...j
1
1/25/72
30
28.5 .
9.1
115
14751
86.584
97
97.13
0.0173
0.0173
0.0138
0.0138
2.19
2.19
0.19
0.19
-
2
1/25/72
30
28.5
8.6
115
14309
83.369
73
73.16
0.0135
0.0135
0.0107
0.0107
1.65
T.65
0.15'
0.15
-
3
1/26/72
30
28.5
7.9
no
14367
82.858
47
47.032
0.0087
0.0087
0.0071
0.0071
1.07
1.07
0.097
0.097
-
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 2
SlUMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION J
Reactor Tail Gas Scrubber Outlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Ho
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temper aliire, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas 0 S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride* total , ing
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
C, \J
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
1/25/72
30
30
4.3
94
21918
48.364
3.7
3.747
0.0012
0.0012
0.0011
0.0011
0.2254
0.2254
0.02-
0.02
89.7
2
1/25/72
30
30
4.9
98
21216
47.552
2.6
2.61
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.1455
0.1455
0.013
0.013
91.2
3
1/26/72
30
30
4.6
92
21981
46.605
2.5
i
2.535
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.1507
0.1507
0.014
0.014
85.9
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION K
Dryer Tall Gas Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
S^.?ck pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P?0[- Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P?0,5 Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
1/25/72
30
28.6 .
7.3
115
137359
67.854
200
200.12
0.0454
0.045.4
0.0371
0.0371
53.44
53.44
4.86
4.86
-
2
1/25/72
30
28.6
10.7
115
51682
26.004
62
62.05
0.03.67
0.0367
0.0289
0.0289
16.25
16.25
1.48
1.48
-
3
1/26/72
30
28.4
4.3
115
45480
67.162
125
125
0.0287
0.0287
0.024
0.024
11.19
11.19
1.02
1.02
-
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION L
Dryer Tail Gas Scrubber Outlet
Run No.
Date '
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P00C Fed.
t. b
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P00C Fed.
c b
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
1/25/72
30
30
2
75
...... - ,
54942
109.926
37
37.04
0.0052
0.0052
0.005
0.005
2.45
2.45
0.22
0.22
95.4
2
1/25/72
30
30
3
81
49319
100.929
21.4
21.431
0.0033.
0.0033
0.0031
0.0031
1.39
! 1.39
0.13
0.13
91.5
3
1/26/72
30
30
1.9
72
38169
88.849
20
20.01
0.0035
0.0035
0.0034
0.0034
1.44
1.44
0.13
0.13
87.1 '.
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
Station M
Cooler Tail Gas Scrubber Inlet
Run No.
Date '
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature , °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
h luoncie, total , rng
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, lb/t.on P90r Fed.
f. 0
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
1/25/72
30
27.97
6.7
107
67510
116.54
72
72.14
0.0095
0.0095
0.0077
0.0078
5.50
5.50
0.50
0.50
97.1
2
1/25/72
30
27.97
5.4
108
74755
185.355
58
58.026
0.0048
0.0048
0.004
0.004
3.08
3.08
0.28
0.28
-
3
1/26/72
30
27.97
6.1
in
75660
134.067
70
70.023
0.008
0.008
0.007
0.007
5,19
5.19
0.47
0.47
91.9
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
. TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION U
OUTLET
Run No.
Date '
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moistures % volume
Average stack gas temperature., CF.
• Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P.", SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, ing
Fluoride, total , ing
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P90g Fed.
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P?0r Fed.
System efficiency, %
1
1/25/72
30
30
2.4
88
103106
140.957
29.2
29.229
0.0032
0.0032
0.003
0.003
2.83
2.83
0.26
0.26
95.4
2
1/25/72
30
30
2
90
103267
141.485
11.4
11.424
0.0012
0.0012
0.0012
0.0012
1.06
1.06
—
0.097
0.097
94.9
3
1/26/72
30
30
2.1
84
105651
143.775
20.6
20.629 |
0.0022
0.0022
0.0021
0.0021
2.01
2.01
0.18
0.18
88.5
Dry, 70°F. , 29.92 inches Hg.
10
-------
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
STATION W
By-Pass
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg +
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total,, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/ton P,,0r Fed.
/-. b
Fluoride, total, Ib/ton P20r Fed.
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
1/25/72
30
28.9
10.3 '
115
7407
129.443
131000 .
131000
15.6
15.6
12. 41:
12.4
990
990
90
90
-
2
1/25/72
30
28.9
10.1
115
7419
44.089
145000
145000
50.6
50.6
40.5
1 40.5
3217
3217
292
292
-
3
1/26/72
30
28.9
9.0
no
7730
52.999
188000
188000
54.6
54.6
44.6
44.6
3217
3217
329
329
-
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
+ Saturated Gas; % mositure determined by wet bulb-dry bulb method.
11
-------
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Production of granular triple superphosphate involves the reaction
of phosphate rock with phosphoric acid as follows:
Ca3 (P04)2 + 4H3P04 + 3 H£0 + 3 CaH4(P04)2 . H20
The reactor slurry is pumped to the granulator in which it mixes
with recycled material. The granules are built up to product size be-
fore flowing to a rotary dryer in which hot burner gases reduce the
product moisture content. The product is then cooled and screened be-
fore being conveyed to the storage pile.
PROCESS OPERATION
Run #1 was conducted on January 25, 1972, from 12:00 to 2:00 p.m.
Run #2 was started at 3:40 p.m. and completed at 5:40 p.m. The third
run was carried out the next day from 10:00 a..TO. to 12:00 p.m. Process
conditions were normal for all three runs.
12
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling sites and number of traverse points were selected
as per "Method I - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary
Sources, Part 60, Subchapter C, Chapter 1, Title 40," Federal Register,
No. 247-Pt. II-l.
The above method suggeets using two perpendicular diameters of
traverse points per sampling station, however, on-site conditions
necessitated the use of only one traverse diameter. The suggested num-
ber of traverse points per diameter was used where possible without
sampling within one inch..of the inner wall. Table 8 summarizes the actual
number of traverse points for each sampling site.
Figures 2 through 8 are schematic diagrams of the stack configura-
tions near the sampling location, and the sampling points traversed during
the emission tests.
13
-------
TABLE 8
SAMPLING POINT DESCRIPTION
Sampling Point Station
Identification
Reactor Tail Gas Scrubber Inlet
Reactor Tail Gas Scrubber Outlet
Dryer Tail Gas Scrubber Inlet
Dryer Tail Gas Scrubber Outlet
Copier Tail Gas Scrubber Inlet
Stack
Recycle
I
J
K
L
M
U
M
Number of
Traverse Points
6
12
24
8
24
13
14
Stack
Diameter
(ft.)
3.0
2.5
5.5
-
5.5
7.2
2.58
-------
t\
>8 Dia.
l\
>10 dia
O
1_
.Port
Diameter = 3 £t
Traverse Point
I
2
3
4
5
6
Distance from
Inner Wall (in.)
FI72
5 1/4
10 5/8
25 3/8
30 3/4
34 3/8
FAN
LOCATION OF PORT, STATION I, BORDEiN CHEMICALS
Figure 2
15
-------
r
Diameter = 2.5'
5' c_4<3-— 10
-OK
Port
Travgrse_Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Distance from Inner Wall (ft)
0.14
0.25
0.37
0.50 - •
0.67'
0.92
1.59
1.83
2.00
2.14
2.25
2.36
'LOCATION OP TORT, STATION J, B011DHN CHEMICALS
Figure 3
16
-------
Diameter =5.5 ft
Traverse Point
1 •
2
3
4 •
5
6
7
8
9
• 10
' 11
12
Distance from
Inner Wall (ft.)
0.12
0.37
0.65
0.97
1.38
1.95
3.55
4.13
4.53
4.85
5.13
. 5.38
LOCATION 01; PORT, STATION K, BORDEN CHEMICALS
Figure 4
17
-------
Top View
Stack
Stack
Port
Trave r s e Po in. 1:
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
Distance from
Inner JVa11 (in.)
3
9
IS
21 .
• 27
33
39
45 .
Side View
LOCATION OP POUT, STATION L, RORD1-N CHEMICALS
Figure 5
18
-------
Dianeter = 5.5 ft
Traverse Point
1
2
3
4
.5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Distance from
Liner Wa]l (ft)
0.12
0.37
0.65
0.97
38
95
55
4.13
4.53
4.85
5.13
5.38
LOCATION OF PORT, STATION M, BORUEN CHEMICALS
Figure 6
19
-------
>8D
A
Port
Diameter = 7.2 ft.
Velocity
Traverse
Point
1
2
' .3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Distance from
Inner Wall
(inches)
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
78
LOCATION OP PORT, STATION U, BORDEN CHEMICALS
Figure 7
20
-------
TOP
VIEW
23'
Diameter =2.58
V
Traverse Point
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Distance from
Inner Wai 1 (ft)
0.13
0.22
0.32
0.43
0.56
0.73
0.96
61
.85
00
15
26
,36
2.45
LOCATION OF POUT, STATION W, l^ORDRN Ciil-MICALS
Figure 8
21
-------
VII. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL'PROCEDURES
A. Preliminary Moisture Determination
The preliminary moisture content of the stack gases at each
sampling site was determined by Method 4 of the Federal Register
(Volume 36, Number 247, Part II, December 23, 1971).
The only significant difference between F.R. Method 4 and
the method used was the configuration of the sampling train (see
Figure 9). The sampling train used in these tests consisted of the
first two midget impingers with 5 grams of distilled-deionized water
followed by two dry midget impingers.
At sampling sites where liquid entrainment was a problem* the
preliminary and final moisture contents were determined from wet and
dry bulb thermometry. See Appendix B for the data used in determining
the preliminary moisture content of the stack gases.
After completing the moisture run, the total impinger liquid
plus water rinsings of the probe tip thorough the fourth impinger were
placed in an 8 ounce polyethylene container. The samples were held by
EPA personnel for further analyses.
B. Preliminary Velocity Determination
Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register was used as
a guide in determining the preliminary stack gas velocity for each source
tested. The major difference was that only the maximum and minimum
^Station W
22
-------
velocity heads across each stack area were determined so that a proper
nozzle size could be selected. During each of the three fluoride
emission tests, velocity head readings were taken at points selected
by using Method 1 of the Federal Register.
Stack pressure and temperature measurements were also made
during the preliminary velocity determinations.
C. Sampling for Fluoride Emissions
The sampling procedure used for determining fluoride emissions
was similar to Method 5 of the Federal Register. The major difference
between the two methods was the configuration of the sampling train.
The sampling train described in the Federal Register has a heated box
containing the filter holder directly following the glass probe. The
sampling train used in these tests contained no heated box and the filter
holder was placed between the third and fourth impingers (between dry
impinger and silica gel impinger) to prevent sample carry-over. Figure
10 is a schematic diagram of the sampling train used.
After the selection of the sampling site and the minimum number
of sampling points per Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register,
three separate test runs were performed. For each run, the required
stack and sampling parameters were recorded on field data sheets. They
are included in Appendix B . Readings were taken at each traverse point
at least every five minutes, and when significant changes in stack para-
meters necessitated additional adjustments to maintain an isokinetic flow
rate. Nomographs were used to aid in the rapid adjustment of the sampling
23
-------
rate. The traverse points were selected to maintain at least one inch
from the inner stack wall.
After each run, the liquid volume in the first three impingers
was measured volumetrically and the silica gel was reweighed. The im-
pinger liquid, the filter, plus the water washings of the probe and other
sampling train components up to the silica gel were placed into poly-
ethylene containers. During some runs the different sample fractions
were placed in separate containers, while during others, all of the re-
covered sample was placed into one container.
D. Liquid and Product Grab Samples
Periodically, during each test run, grab samples of the raw
materials, finished product, and scrubber liquid were taken, and the
temperature and pH were determined at the site. On some occasions,
the samples were split with the plant personnel so that comparative
analyses could be performed,
E. Laboratory Analysis Procedures
Water soluble fluorides were done by a sulfuric acid distil-
lation followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD. Water insoluble
fluorides were first fused with NaOH followed by a sulfuric acid distil-
lation then by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD.
PpOg analysis of the stack effluent was done by EPA personnel.
All other P,>05 analyses were done by plant personnel.
For more details of exact method used see Appendix C.
24
-------
PO i?
en It.
n o
i .*» .
I O.
17.
17
Heated Glass Probe With Pyrex Wool as Filter
Glass Connector
lea Bath
Midget Impinger With 5 Grams H?0
Midget Impinger With 5 Grams H^O
Midget Impinger, Dry
Midget Impinger, Dry
Flexible Sample Line
Vacuum Gauge
Main Control Valve •
By-Pass Control Valve
Air Tight Vacuum Pump • . '
Dry Test Meter
Tharr.ometer
Calibrated Orifice
Inclined Manometer
S-Type Pi tot Tube -
Figure 9
MOISTURE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
1 2 3
j^'^^Xt ^ ' " i i •« in "I .1 . -T, -imnm rjiBiii i «•• *i». L. irflfl. -Val.
* /^^-J
v~* ^ j, "~
c-v *
-------
APPENDIX
-------
APPENDIX A
Emission Calculations & Results
-------
E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE SHEET
PB - Baroraetric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
As - Stack area, sq. ft.
AS'- Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. ft.
NPTS - Number of traverse points where the pitot velocity head was greater than zer
TS - Stack temperature, °R
TM - Meter temperature, °R
_H - Average square root of velocity head, Vinches
. A.H - Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches H20
AN - Sampling nozzle area, square feet
CP - S-type pitot tube correction factor
VM - Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
VC - Condensate and silica gel increase in impringers, milliliters
Po - Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, fiPB +A H~l inches Hg
L 13.6]
STP - Standard conditions, dry, 70 °F, 29.92 inches Hg
Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Moisture fraction of stack gas
Dry gas fraction
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (dry conditions)
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole (stack conditions)
Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to air
Excess air, %
Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
Stack gas velocity, feet per minute
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (stack conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (dry conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (STP)
Percent isokinetic volume sampled (method described in Federal Register)
Total Sample Time (minutes)
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
VWV = (0.0474) x (VC)
VSTPD = (17.7.1 x (VM) x (PB + AIL. ) .i. TM
13.6
VT = (VWV) + (VSTPD)
W = (VWV)-r(VT)
FDA = (1.0) - (W)
FMOIST = Assumed moisture fraction
MD = (0.44 x % CO ) + (0.32 x % 0£) + (0.28 x % N£) + (0.28 x % CO)
MS = (MD x FDA) + (18 x W)
GS = (MS) -£- (28.99)
EA = [(100) x (% 02 - -^2—)] -7- Qo.266 x % N£) - (% 02 - %.,CO)
U = (174) x (CP) x (H) x V(TS x 29.92)-7-(GS x PS)
QS = (U) x (AS)
QD = (QS) x (FDA)
QSTPD = (530) x (QD) -~(TS) x (PS) ^-(29.92)
PISO = (o. oo267 x VC x TS) + (PQ x TS x VM-=-TM) ~» (Time x IJ x PS x AN)
Fluoride Emissions:
MG = Milligrams of fluoride from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG) -£- VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF) ~ (TS)
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD)
P2°5 Fed = Tons/hour, determined from plant data ..
Lbs/ton P20 Fed = (Ibs/hour) -^- (Tons/hour P0 Fed)
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
££
TFS? no -
PL AWT - POP.DVn CHEl'ICAL
SOURCE - STATION I
TYPE OF PL APT •• G.T.S.P.
CONTROL EQUIPVF.H'T -
POLLVTA11TS SAMPLED - Fluorides
/70 OF nuns -
py POII1T > FLA
DRUE tiUHBER
2 ) DA TE
H)TIUE END
5)BAPO!>E'!'RIC PRESSURE, IE JIG
b)!-JETER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20
T)VOL DRY GAS, METER C011D , CUBIC FEET
B)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEG F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10) TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, 11L
1DVOL U20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. . CU F'.
12) STACK. GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLU'-'E
13) ASSUMED STACK CAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
in) PERCENT C02
IS) PERCENT 02
Ib) PERCENT CO
17) PERCENT 112
IB)PERCEHT EXCESS AIR
1$)MOLECVLAR HEIGHT OF STACK CAS, DRY
2Q)UOLECULAR MIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COIJ1
21 )S TACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IU H20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEliP^VEL HEAD)
2 b ) PI TOT C ORE E CTIO I! FA C TOR
2b)STACK PRESSURE, IU RG , ABSOLUTE
27) S TA CK GAS VEL , STA CK COIJD , F.P. J', .
2B)STACK APE A, SQ FEET
29) EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30)STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31)ilET TIME OF TEST, UIUUTSS
32)SAi-:PLi;-!C HOZZLE DIAMETER, IUCHES
3 3 ) PERCEH T ISOKIHKTIC
3H)FLUO;-:iDE - WATER SOLUBLE, UG
3S')FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3b)FLUORIDE - iSATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
37 )FLUORI DE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3$) FLUORIDE - VATER SOL., GR/CF, S'TK CUD.
3V) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD.
HU)FLUORIDE - l-'ATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
HI) FLUORIDE - TOTAL. LB/HOUR
'l3)FLUORIDE - VATEX SOL., Lii/'fOi: P20'J FED
HI\)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LI; /TO;; P2o:> FED
i __j,--..- 1
i ij ° sj1-? ^ 1
1 _U • J1 r -I
1 j -3 • KJL. 1
i |
1 ^ 7n i
i BH n°T 1
1 J?P ° i
J_ R^ r, pjj. J_
J -LB^ 1
F 1 _r> R 7 J[
1 ° J. 1
1 1-D 1
1 i
1 1
1 _ _ ~ i
1 __ - 1
1 J) i
1 ?.B-A fi.5 1
-)l_^7^i}R_ 1_
1 O.Q6 _ 1
10.723 J.
1115.3 _[
J 17.333 J.
J_ 0 . 83 _[
J_ 2 p . 5 _[
J_ 2 6 1 R . 2 _[
J_ 7 . 07 _[
1 7.07 L
114751 J_
1 12° „ i
J_ 0 . 2 !> _[
J_ 101.4 _[
197 1
J_~977l3 _["
I 0.0173 I
J_ 0.0173 _[
J-^-y|-- — j-
1 '2 . 1 9 J.
i _. -1
l_!Pj:l? L_
.j? _ _1 j
J.jf ° ^7 7 '• 1 .17 ° r- ' 7 °
1 ri • "J3 J 10 -DO
1JZ ' ''•JD J. 1 ^ ' nD
JO J. JO
ns^unjj J. RS iT-q
R?^? J_ H^^l
3 3^ 3 n n 182 .. R 5 8
16JLJ i - *'"
LJM i 7.00
8^6 17."
10 10
L o. 2
1 2 0 . G
1 o
1 79.2
0 _[ 4 ;i 0 °
28.85 J. 2 n . n n
27_._92 1_2R
0 . 6 9 0 I 0 . n 9 3
115.2 J_ 1 1 0 . R
16.701 j_ l 6 . f, H 0
0.83 J_ 0 , P 3
28.5 _[ 2 8 . 5
2522.9 _[ 2 4 9 H . 2
7. 07 J! 7. 07
7.07 1 7 • ° 7
] 43H9 1 -1- ff " '" 7
120 j^ iT20
0.25" j_ 0. 25
i^cL-6 _ i ° q • 7
T,T7T"^ i ~"'TT.~(T'T'-
rr. OT3~5~ i cr. 0101 i /
' " _' '' J. '"_''_' ^_
1 . 6.5 i 1 HZ
_ 1 _
0.150 j. o.npy
p JJO l!ZoI-J)S7
!
1
!
1
i
I
!
-
***t>.T.]'.*~>-DRy, 70 DEGREE;; F, 29.92
-------
ZQURCE Z£.SL MI&.
TEST UO-
PLANT - BORDEU CIIE11ICAL PI HEX
SOURCE - BE ACTOR SCRUBBER OUTLET J
TYPE OF PLAUT - G.T.S.P.
COUTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTAIJTS SAMPLED - Fluorides
NO OF
POINT,
RUNS
FLA.
1)RU.,' i'UI'BER
2 ) DA TE
3 ) TI*-' '•'! B E G A I<
4 ) TIM L! E ii'D
5)BARO!!ETRIC PRESSURE, It: HG
&)!'JETcR ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, III H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, i-!ETER COUD, CUBIC FEET
B)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10)TOTAL !!20 COLLECTED, HL
11)VO L i! 2 0 VA POR COLLECTED , S.T.P. , CU
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H) PERCENT C02
15) PER CENT 02
17) PER CENT fJ2
1B)PERCEHT EXCESS AIR
1<3)!-;OLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)VOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CO
21 )S TACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), 1/7 H20
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
24)/l'c; SQUARE ROOT (STK TE!iP*VEL HEAD)
2S)PIIOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2§)STACK PRESSURE, Hi UG, ABSOLUTE
27)ST»CK GAS VEL, STACK COUD, P.P.}',.
2Q)ST/>CK AREA, SO FEET
23)EFFBCTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30)STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFM'D
3l)nET TIl'E OF TEST, MTUUTES
32)SAi-:PLi;!C UOZZLE DIAMETER, IUCHES
33) PERCENT ISOKIIJETIC
3>(-)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, UG
35) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3b)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3'/)FLUORIDL-; - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3Q)FLUORi;.):i: - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD
3V)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD
HO)ELUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
HDFLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/UQilP
H3)FLUORID;.: - WATER SOL., LB/TOiJ P20'J FE
4 4 )FLUORI DiJ - TOTAL, LB/TOU P205 Fi-'
|
|
' |
i
1 1
I/.0 5.Z.10 1
1 0 • 1 S J.
1 !i ' 1.5 L
30 1
jL_5.o..-5-i7_— i
J_
J_
^
FT].
\
|
I
|
[_
///.>!
I
j_
j_
j_
j_
I
1
j_
• JL
j_
1
{-
j_
. 1.,
. _[_
i_
l_
1
D 1_
D 1
0 G 9 \
||P Sfil). _[
'K5 _[
2JL8 _i
^•-3 _„ 1
1
1
1
? 0 . R 5 j
2 8 . 3 o _[
0 . 0 S _[
1 . 41 P.. _[
94.2 _[
33.3 8 4 J_
0.33 J_
30 J_
U06G . 1 J_
4.91 l
ZL^ITi
120 j^
"•T^5 1
TD b ,T) ^
3C-,~ i
Tr.-Tnrr^ — j
7) .1)7)1."^ i
Z _ i -L .
V ° ^i-T-,^ i 1_/ ° ^ / 7 °
•"< r- vJ1 "i. J. 1 o • no
1_7 . ini_ J. 1 ? • 00
.10 1 30
CU.un_ j. O.J5 _ „
!lJL-JL" ° I 48.3
o QLJL - J vi. .';
41— T^° i '!T) • rirr>
51 fL I 47.'!-
2_JLri J - • 2 5
li^_P 1 4 • r>
'L _ L ^
1 °
I 20.2
1 °
i 79- 8
n J 1 n r> 7
? 8 ^ OJ 1 2 8 • n -
JL8_,_P!2_ [,22ji21
0.98 _[ o . n n
1 . 3f]4 J. 1.421
- TJ 8 1 9 1 • 7
3 2 . f> 7 n J_ 3 .'; . 3 7 c!
0 . R 3 J_ 0 . .'3 3
30 _[ 3 0
4 7 OR . 3 _[ 4^71 . f>
4.01 J_ 4 . -"i 1
i A • i 1 ~ *
J. «-
25 2J 6 _[ ^1^»--
120 J_ I ' ~> 0
^ 1^ 5 J__J • *]?5
1 0 7 . G _[ - ^T . T>
2.71 |_ 7?. 5
2.61 j_ 7.H^o
7i7"o7)08 ^"'nrniTijrT
o. no OB i ^. nnrr;.
!
I
1
1
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
-•
7) .7)7)11 ~ JL n . o o o a ~ _[ IT . UFF^
^^11 i
0.2?i4 -1
~0."2^54" j_
_ _ ^ i
_0_._p2^_ I
0-. 02 • _[
0.0008 1 ;J(-"' •
J)_ 1455 l_fl^L&Q2,r
0.1455 _[ ^.1507
J
j3_. oTs LP-t-QM
o.TiTs j_ o.oK-
***,!/. T. P
70 DEGREES F, 29.92
-------
TP.ST no - . no OF RUNS - 3
PL'AllT - BORDEU CHEMICAL PINEY POINT, FLA.
SOURCE - DRYER SCRUBBER INLET K
T'IPF, OF PLANT - G.T.S.P.
CONTROL F.QUlPllEttT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - Fluorides
___..J ______ 1 ___ 3- ______ 1 ____ 3. ____ -1
1 __ l_2--_CLci ____ L
1 __ 3.0. ______ 1
JLJLQ _______ 1-3JCL
L__(i."L».7 ______ I
l-JLLJL _____
.LJULI. ____ i
1
1 - -
J
L
1
_. 1 .
j_
_ 1 .
i.
_„!.
1
. Q^.5
19-JL
o
7 Q^7
II
II
II
1)RUN NUMBER
2 ) DA TE
3)TI!-!E BECAK
H)TIME END
S)BAPO:-!£TRIC PRESSURE, IN HG
b)UETER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COliD, CUBIC FEET
8)AVER AGE GAS VETER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
1Q)TOTAL 1120 COLLECTED, IIL
11) VOL 1120 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13)ASSU!!ED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
14)PER CENT C02
lb)PERCENT CO
17) PER CENT 1/2
IU)PERCENT EXCESS AIR 1 0 [_0 i_J_i!jJl II
13)liOLECVLAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY l_JLfLJJL I_2_8_J-S_ 1_JJLJJL I1
20)fJOLEC'ULAR HEIGHT OF- STACK GAS, STK CONDi_J2Jj_.J}J,_ L2JL.J69 1_JJL_H. II
21)S?ACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY .L_P_-JL7_ IJLJLS -LJLJilL.,.. i1
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN U20 1_JL--L6JL LJL_71L'L 1_JLJL3JL __._..!!
23) AVER AGE STACK GAS TEI'PERATUR E, DEG F JLAAJL _iJJU? !-l_J-JJ- Jl
2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TUMP^VEL HEAD) l^JLLvAfL2. U-JLJJU 1_JJL^JL«_J!
2 b )PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR 1_JL-_8_1 Jl^JJ l_JL»Jl?_ Jl
26)5^/167: PRL'SSUX*, IN UG, ABSOLUTE i_JL8_--L UJ^J 1__2J_-^ J1
2DSTACK GAS VEL, STACK COND, F.P.tf. 1_ J_°_9_°_-..7 J.^JJiU 6 LJ^JI'jJ? J
2B)ST/,CK AREA, SO FEET i_JL3_-JL 12-3*2$ 1_^.:.2'^ i!
2V)EFFi:CTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET l__2_L-_7_ l^J^l7!' l.J^JI^ J
3Q)STACK GAS FLOl-' RATE, S.T.P. , SCFM'D I^JLIIPJL9 1^1^22- l.j.^ll? J
31)NET TIi-'E OF TEST, HINUTES I_A°_0 ll2.® 1 111 J
32)SAi-'PLIUG i:OZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES ' 1__° V1 R 7Ji 12^12.1] -LJiU2-?
33 )PERCENT ISOKIUETIC 1__5_9_JL?.!-2-111^I 1—93_._6.
3H)FLUORIDE - l-JATER SOLUBLE, UG 1__2_°_° i^2 i.il'I3 .
35) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG l^JLl'L.'JtiL^-l^JL °Il [-111
3G)FLUORIDE - VATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF " "~
3'DFLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3Q)FLUORIDE - l/ATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD,
Z'DFLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CND,
^0) FLUOR IDE - UATER SOLUBLE, LU/1IOUR 1_J3_.44 ___„! JjA25.
HI)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/HOUR l^J^^il! lDJL.25
H3)FLUORIDE •• l/ATER SOL.t LB/TON P20\> FED lIIO£lHIIi3-"l-4^§.-
H>\)FLUO.:-!irE - TOTAL, LB/TOIi P20'J FED 1_JL-M llL48_
***S.T.r.+~>-DRY t 70 DUG RE EX F, 29.92 INCHES MERCURY***
-------
<~"nnn /"•'"' T^o'/1 n/i VM
LiUiiLikii L:±l2.E - HATER SOL., Ltf/TOi'i 2-205 FED
i\>i')FLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/TOi.' P20b FED
F RUHS - 3
, FLA .
I _ i
j
1 i ^ • rx5»
i 10.
i q "i r-
1 UL5_ JLBJ
1 1 n 1 1
1 J_OiL._9J?n
1 •. l ' t_ -n
rj_ o o_p
1 j?
i ^
1
1 _ _
1
1
1 o
1 ?JLJ.5
~\ 1 O O P O
1 0 0 O
1 0.8 '1 1
1 75
_[ i o . fi- n
J_ 0. S3
i 30
1 ''Gpo q
1 20
1 20
J_ 5H9U2
_[ 120
J_ 0.25
1 97 ' 8
1 3 7
J_ 3 7 . 0 u
J_ 0.005 2
J_ 0.0052
j_ 0.005
iT.Ts^ —
i 2.45'
1
i ^-^2
!
"IH
_[ 1 7
J. 30
-i 9
1 1 o
i q5
J. 1 n
J P5
1 3
i 3_.
1 3
_1 .
1 _
_1 -
i_ -
1 o__
1 Q t
1 0.
1 ';11
i 17
1 °'
J_ 30
[25
1 20
1 ?n
1 /49-
J_l P. f
J_ 0. ;
J_ 1 0 (
J_21 .
J_21
J 0. (
1°' f
_[0. (
"1^7
J.TI~^
L
[0.1
jro.l
9 _[
f^— ]
i-^Q. _ _1
1
Ji. _ _, _1
"-LJHP i
Q^P 2 n i
^_3 1
i- i
- - 1
i
„_!
_ __ J
1
1
_. i
> P, 5 J_
^ _»_^
7 6 5 [
J_
.706 _[
03 i
1
1 7 . '1 _[
_[
J_
310 _[
J J
) 5 |
' 1
'' 1
'i-31 J_
) 0 3 3 1
5033 ~_[
) 0 o 1 _[
) 0 3 1 _[
ial"1" L
a_ _i
j.
3 _[
3 _[
o 1
-^-~p--{
1 9 • o n J_
30 1
in? i
n 9 ? ;i 3 |
9 4 % i, |
R 8 . P H o !
3 5 . ^ 1
1 . 7 i
1_,^ j
0 !
19.7 >
_o i
GO.:5, j
1 1 R 7 !
2 8 . 7 n i
___2j]_.Jv2 j
0 . 5 P 1
72
13 . '! OH
0 . R 3
SO
10U7 . 2
20
20
3 P. i r o
1 2 0
0 . 2 !j
11- 3 . -".
2.0
"2"0~. ^l
Tl. T^TT;'!,
n. iTT!;Ti")
T5. dr)!TiT
""TTr"" —
L_4A-
0.13
0.13
70 DEGRL'RS F, 29.92 INCURS VERCUHy*
-------
S.QURCE
TEST 110 -
PLA11T - HORDE!! C,pr.l*'ICAL PJ
SOURCE - COOLER IULE? .»
TYPF OF PL.MIT - G.T.S.P
CONTROL EOl!7P!''EUT -
POLLUTANTS SAllPLfin - Fluorides
F.y. POIUT, FLA
DRUE liUMDER
2 ) DA TE
4 ) TIME EIW
S)BARO!!STRIC PRESSURE, IE HG
6 ) METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, I!! H20
1}VOL DRY GAS, METER COI1D, CUBIC FEET
6) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9)1/01, DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
1Q) TOTAL I! 20 COLLECTED, ML
11) VOL i!20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU F'.
12) STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
IS^PERCEUT 02
1G ) PERCENT CO
nypERCEUT i/2
1 8 ) PER C Eli T EXCESS A IR
13) MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
20)MOLECULAR HEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COUl
21) STACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)/iKc; SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD}, III H20
23)AVURAGE STACK CAS TEMPERATURE, DEC F
24)/m; SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD)
2b~)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2b')STACK PRESSURE, III UG, ABSOLUTE
2 7 ) S TA CK GAS VEL , STA CK COliD , F.P.I1..
2B)STACK AREA, SO FEET
2V)E?FICTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
3Q)STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31~)i!ET TIME OF TEST, MIUUTES
32)SAMPLi;!C KOZZLE DIAMETER, IIICHES
33)PERCEHT ISOKII1ETIC
3'l~)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
3S)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, MG
3&)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
37) FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3Q)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CT, STK CUD.
HO) FLUORIDE - HATER SOLUBLE, LU/UOUP
HDFLUORIDE - TOTAL. LI! /HOUR
H3)FLUORIDE - 1-/ATER SOL., LH/TOfi P20b FED
i\H)FLUOHIi)i: - TOTAL, LD/TVU P205 FED
!•'„!_ -j -1 __^- 1
lJJ_ULCL_ L 4-5_:^J3 L -,W^JDr-> 1
iJJUJLQ L_JLO_:.CD L HL:_LCl !
i 30_ _ „ _ l_^n ._! _ ?0 _ ,!
I 117 113 1 1 .3 P Jii -> J. '!3U r-3^ |
1 7 8 i 2 n L 7 ^ '• 1
1 1 1 fL, 5 i\ _[ 1 n_5 3 <-- $ I 1 n IL n r- 7 j
i 1 7 7 J. 9 o 1 7 _[ 1 B ^ 9 |
fil p} pq 1 1 0 S1 I 8 . ?)>'- j
I B 7 I 5 u 1 PJ 1 I
I 7 q J_ 2 ° 1 ^J i
1 1 „_!_ n_ _ _ J
1 1 1 0 I
i 1 1 ?!?.« j
J_ o _[ n J. ? - ''• 7
1 0 8 . R f) _[ 0 p p c; 1 0 ,q p o
;J_2K.l? _[ 2R.27 J. 2H.1 r,
10.97 1 o . r>R 1 n . ny
10.065 1 1 A 0 5 7 1 1 . n 7 P
1107 1107.0 1 110.7
1 2 2 . 9 R fi 125.180 [ ?. 5 . 7 5 n
10.03 1 0 . B 3 L n • q ' •'
127.97 1 27.07 1 27,97
[.Vins.q [3nic.3 i 3906.2
i *"* *5 '") C~ 1 O O T r* I O ' J *V i*"
.oor?j^ loo^r* i O'-!r/r~
if~*7ii'iM i T 1 1 •"* p p i ~i r~ r f r\
1 b / o it) i 7 'i / 5 5 1 75660
1 1 2 0 1 ! :- ° 1 ! ' - °
I'D . "5 5 10.25" i o . 2 r.
1 "J~n 0 . 2 1 1 H'-i 11 09 Q
J. " _; _ J. ' _ J. IU£. ^
i^2 T- __ 1 5fi ._ 1 7() "
j"7T? . IT| t 5 n . 02 n i 7u .023 —
j^T) . T^n n .': i o . o o 4 n i ^ . o rTsT
J^TS . "HTi7)!! i o . o o '4 n j_ o" . ntTir
i"D.T!'Ti77 ^ 0.0 O'i i 0.0065
jp.lj-np .j_ O.oo»
-------
E TEST DAU
TEST NO -
PLANT - BORDEN CHEMICAL
SOURCE - OUTLET STACK U
TYPE OF PLANT - G.T.S.P.
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - Fluorides
• - NO OF RUNS
PINEY POINT, FLA.
- 3
DRUil NUMBER
2)DATE . '
3) TIMS BEGAN
*)TIUE END ••' " -
•^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, 177 HG '
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20.
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COND, CUBIC FEET
8) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
3)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
1Q)TOTAL 1120 COLLECTED, ML
11)VOL 1120 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU F'j
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13)ASSU;.'ED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H)PERCEHT CO 2
IS) PERCENT 02 •
It) PERCENT CO '•"•.
17) PER CENT N2 ••••:..
IB) PERCENT EXCESS AIR
13)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)UOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK COI-l
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN H20
23)AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
. 2H)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP* VEL HEAD)
25)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2&)STACK PRESSURE, Hi HG , ABSOLUTE
27 )S TACK CAS VEL, STACK COND, F.P.M.
2Q)STACK AREA, SQ FEET • .
29)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
30) STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31) NET TIME OF TEST, MINUTES
32)SAi-PLING NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
23)PERCENT ISOKIllETIC^
3H)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, MG
3S)FLUORIDL - TOTAL, MG
36)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
37)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3B)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
33)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, GR/CF, STK CUD.
HQ)FLUORIDE - 1-,'ATER SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
HDFLUORIDE - TOTAL, LB/l'.OUR
-N
H3)FLUORIDL - WATER SOL.; LB/TOii P20S FED
HH)FLUOXIDE - TOTAL, LB/TOii P205 FED
1 1
1 11 '25,
1 13 -25.
1 act
1 a us.
1 140 9 S 7
1 7 ^4-
''I 3 5.1
1 2^.4
1_5_
1
1
1
1
1 28,_85
?1 28 W59
1 Q.^99
J_ 0.785
1 8 7 ,_8
J_ 18.376
J_ 0.83
J^ 30
.J[ 2669
J_ 40. 81
J_ 40.81
J_ 103106
J^ 120
J_0_.25
i 9^78
j^TT. 2
i ~2~9 .229
|bToT)32
p."0"03~2
i lT."d"0 3
iTT.~0~0~3
1 "2 . 83
1^2.83
j_
i 0~. 2"B
i 0?26
1—3. -
1 JLltT-0-&-— ~— -
i
-L 1.6. * ^0-
13.0.-- J
1 U.^L1_ _ J
1-2.9.^9.
J •] 1^1 _t u_q 5
1 5J-* 7-
1 2, 8JL J
I 2^ 1
1_5. J
1 J
1 J
1 J
1 J
i Q. J
1 2JLV_64 J
1 O-^g. J
I 0^78,5-
190.3
1 L8-JULJL 1
IJLJU J
1_3_0 J
i26_72_,9 J
J. 40_, 81 J
J. 4 0_, 8 1
J_ 103267 J
I120 J
1 0.25
1 9_7^2 J
J_ll . 424 J
J_0.0012
J_0.0012
_[ 0. 0012
_[ 0. 0012
1 1 -D6.
1 1-.I36.
j_
J. 0.097
J. 0.097
a. 1
•L/L- n 0 1
1_? '-JITL '
J3JL !
4, "L7 '
.IjJLuS II
3_, 14 i
JL_1» •
L__5 i
L _ 1
Li
L i
L 1
o i
2 8_, 8 5 !
28.62 i
L 0 j 9 9 i
L 0.8 ;
8 3 • 6 f
L 18641 i
L °-» 8 3 '
L 30 !
L 2705.9 *
L 40 . 81 i
40.81 !
L 105651 i
[ 120 i
|p-i25 .
JD2^a i
L 20.6 i
._ — — __
[ O.U022 ;
3.0022 i
TI.O"0~2T i
L TJ.UOTr
L2JU
L ?JD
L 0.18
L 0.18
***S.T.P.->-+DRY, 70 DEGREES F. 29.92 11,'CHKS MERCURY***
t% ISOKiriETIC DETERMINED USING VELOCITY HEAD-READINGS FROM ACTUAL FLUORIDE TEST, NOT
VELOCITY HEADS OF COMPLETE STACK TRAVERSE.
-------
DA TA
TEST IW -
PLAUT - BORDFU CKEf.ICAL
SOURCE - RECYCLE STATT. Oil I!
TYPE OF PL ART - G.T.S.P.
COUTROL EQUIPHEiiT -
POLLUTAUTS SAMPLED - Fluorides
770 OF RUUS - 3
PINEY POINT, FLA .
DRUil UUl'.DER
2 ) DA TE
^)TIUE EXD
^BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IF 1!G
& WE TEH ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, If? H20
T)VOL DRY GAS, METER C011D, CUBIC FEET
B) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. „ CUBIC FEET
\Q)TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, I'L
ll)ll) PERCENT CO 2
IS^l'ERCEUT 02
ib)pERc;j;;T co
17) PER CENT If 2
Iti) PERCENT EXCESS AIR
19 Yt-'iOLECULAR VEIGUT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)UOLECULAR VSIGUT OF STACK GAS, STK COM
2DSTACK CAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), 1/7 H20
23)AVL'RAG£ STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
24)/m; SQUARE ROOT (STK TLilPxVEL HEAD)
25)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2&)STACi: PRESSURE, It! UG , ABSOLUTE
2 7) STACK GAS VEL, STACK CORD, F.P.I',.
28)STACK AREA, SQ FRET
2y)EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET
'J,0)STACK GAS FLOW RATE, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31)iVi'in Tli-'P, OF TEST, MIUUTES
3 2 )S /li-'PLI i! G l*'OZZLl' DlA'IETER, IHCilES
33) PERCENT ISOKI11XTIC
3>l)FLUORIDE - WATER SOLUBLE, UG
3[j)FLUOHID'L - TOTAL, 1'iG
3&)FLUOHIDn - WATER SOLUBLE, GR/SCF
3T)FLUOiiILh-: - TOTAL, GR/SCF
3G)FLUORIDi-: - WATER SOL., GR/CF, STK CUD.
3V)FLUOXIL)E - TOTAL, GR/CF t STK CI.'D.
'\0)FLUORID!:; - '.-.'ATKii SOLUBLE, LB/HOUR
'\DFLUORID,- - TOTAL, LB/HOUR
H3)FLUO;tI!h: - l/ATER SOL., Lt'/TOfi P20b FED
i\l\~)FLUQ;-:lDE - TOTAL, LB/TO:.' P20
-------
SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
-------
From Pond
Flow: 14751 (DSCFM) x^
Total Fluorides: 2.19 #/hr ( I
V^x
7407 rf
990 -V
137359 ^ ^
53.44 ^ . ^
67510 _,
5.50 ^
) — 5>
7)
\__j?,..,
i
Reactor
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency: 89.7
i -
|
From Pond <^}
| vTo Pond
O
_ T/
Dryer
Tail Gas Scrubber
.Efficiency: 95.4
From Pond \_}
O To
J^ Pond
Cooler
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency: 97.1
, -*>--,.,
s'
d
«--
V
D
54942
2.45
P) 21918
J .225
V*.
" ++
'--,
*r
•V f \ V
' :^j
(26jf)
iu nunobpiifcire
A 103106
T 2.83
1 0
Stack
S
E
Overall
System
Efficiency: 95.4
4'To Pond
Borden Chemical
GTSP
Run 1
-------
Flow: 14309 (DSCFMJ
Total Fluoride: 1.65 (#/hr)
7419
3217
51682
16.25
74755
3.08
From Pond
Reactor
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency 91.2
From Pond
To Pond
Dryer
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency: 91.5
To Atmoshere
©
21216
.146
From Pond ( ^ • /j^N
To Pond
49319
1.39
Cooler
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency:
(32,742)
103267
1.06
Stack
Overall
System
Efficiency:
94.9
vTo Pond
Borden Chemical
GTSP
Run 2
-------
From Pond
0
Flow: 14367 (DSCFM)
Total Fluoride: 1.07 (#/hr) /n
7730
3217
45480
11.19
75660
5.19
_ j
Reactor
Tall Gas Scrubber
Efficiency: 85.9
From Pond
To Pond
Dryer
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency: 87.1
From Pond
n
-
To Pond
Cooler
Tail Gas Scrubber
Efficiency: 91.9
0
To Pond
Borden Chemical
GTSP
Run 3
To Atmosphere
4 105651
2.01
©
21981
.151
38169
1.44
45,501
Stack
Overal1
System
Efficiency:
88.5
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE DETERMINATION
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant
Stack O?v?
Date __/•;' °^;> '" *i. **-!.. Sample Time A^'^fK /$S@ Barometric Pressure,
^,
p /• •-•=**'»
Moisture Content ~- Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Condensate Volume
Water Vapor Volume S ?0 °Ff 29,92 "Hg . A-^/ff
Moisture Fraction, H20 A -ft & Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA_
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading /$£ $S^» Ft^
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled • • /& 4 $ O Ft 3
Average Meter Temperature , 7^/f
°F
Average Meter Vacuum "==0 "Ho-
Average Meter Orifice AH ^A 4^^»
Sampling Rate •=
Barometric Pressure 3 Meter Orifice »JJ^
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ 70 °F, 29«92 "Hg /»30 $ $ *?
"HoO
LPM
"Ha-
Ft3
Vapor Pressure Of H20 3 DP
Moisture Fraction, K20__£^,
*
*. "Hg Stack Fressm-e ?,
Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
ml
Moi_st'are_f Content •— I'ethcd 2
Dry Bt0.b Tejip. ^1^ °F Wet Bulb Temp. //3°Y Dew Point Tempo *• °F
"Hg
Spec.ifie Gravity
§°i r "I r n
o^-(<.C02)j +J0.3?-(^02)j + |0«28(^N2 + CO)J = _
« »»— •*->!
Molecular Weight @ Stack Conditions, Ms =RMd)x(FDA)J H- (18)x'(H20}| =
•* ^™ fc-» .—«i
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (M ) ~- (28.99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant /r^.'
Date /"£.£?•
? . ^ , "/.-1 1 - • f- • '-:": '-' / f, £?S. 5
="/••'"', Sample Time /&&
Stacks? -» «/ •=• ^{^.'^.Tr.i^
*J UcLCK *.'- ^, . i> ^ -^ * 1 •' - - ' -f? i ' f
V3 •=• /&3^ Barometric Pressure
~ I'-' f'!'C-'f
A:' ^ "Ks
Moisture, Content °° Method 1
Final Dry Test lister Reading
.*?^ *?, O&&
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled
Average Meter Teniparature
Average Meter Vacuum
D ii
Average Meter Orifice A H_
Sampling Rate
<£>< y.^^ "Hg Stack Pressure
Moisture Fraction, HpO ^Q ^^ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
Ft
°p
"H90
Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA
Specific.. Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = ^o^(;-C02^] +^.32(^02)j +j0.28(^M2 +
Molecular //eight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = [(M,j):c(FDA)j + l(18)x(
"~ **• V—•
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (M,.) ~ (28.99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS
MOISTURE CONTENT ANTD SPECIFIC GRAVITY
<-.,**-.
Plant .£
.f^VjgStack.
et
CJO
Dato
Sample Time
Barometric Pressure
Moisture Content — Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled
Average Meter Temperature
Average Meter Vacuum
Average Meter Orifice AB
Sampling Rate _
Barometric Pressure 3 Meter Orifice
Dry Gas Volume Sampled '3 70 8F, 29»92 "Hg
Condensate Volume
Water Vapor Volume 3 ?0 °F9 29,92 "Hg
Moisture Fraction, K20 &« — 9
Moisture CoT,t?r.t — Method ?.
Dry Bulb Temp. //:"• °? Wet Bulb Temp,
'? Dew Point TempB_
Vapor Pressure Of H20 3 DP
Moisture Fraction, H20
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS .
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant £*?.W £*&.-.&;?. ' Stack <&."/'
Date •- "f"' Sample Tme #£- O Barometric Pressure "Ks
Moisture Content — Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading & (* <2' * _fa fe 6' Ft3
//*"*!
* ;/-r _F
Average Meter Vacuum ; "^'^ "H«y
Average Meter Orifice AH f'Qf & & "H-;0
Sampling Rate _____ _ *=^ LFM
Barometric Pressure 3 Meter Orifice Jr^O
Dry Gas Volume San piled 3 ?0 °Fe 29»92 "He /. 0^ 3 Ft'-
_- « . T r _ A *T^ '' j i^ X ff jv fJp ?_"£ cc^» 3 /*\
Condensate Volume / //..y ; •' <=• A.* .^ / ^ .^ "Hg Stack Pressure ^_
Moisture Fraction, K20 >*• & Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA .V
Specif ic Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = JO.WJ.(;JCC2^] +(o.32(^02M +§o28(^-J2
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = F(Mr])x(FDA)] + Ul8):c(H20;| =
*"• ^™ V«» ..nd
Specific Gravity (Referred to air)9 G. = (M^) -f- (28«99) = __
-------
PRELIMINARY CHSCK FOR STACK GAS .
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
if
Plant -•''.^^•X' * ^•v-.::^g£±H_ Stack
Date _____ /^ ....... ."V. ' '_'; f-"> Sample Time^i/f** _ __ Barometric Pressure .,,,,: ''"^ "
Moisture Content —° Method,' 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Raading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled •. ^ /$"$
Average Meter Temperature .. "^J^
Average Meter Vacuum "^"
Average Meter Orifice A K
Sampling Rate ^ __ LFi-1
Barometric Pressure 3 Meter Orifice _ s!?€3 __ ._."Hg
Dry Gas Volume Sampled '3 70 3F, 29«92 "Hg _ 3o ^ ? 9 _ __ Ft3
Condensate Volume ^0 !'l wl
V/ater Vapor Voliaie 3 ?0 °F, 29,92 "Hg
Moisture Fraction, HoO -^ &3 Fraction Of Dry 'Air, FDA O*
Moisture Cor.t-^nt — i-^thcd 2
Dry Bulb Te^o /^^a? Wet Bulb Temp, - °F Dew Point Temp.
Vapor Pressure Of H20 3 DP g.. ?lB "Hg Stack Pressure ^7^> f ?? "H-
Moisture Fraction, KpO A ^ 9 Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA O •
Specific Gravity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = jO.Mj-CyCOgl] +[oo2(^02)l +|0.28(0M2 +
—i ^— -
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = [(Mci);c.(FDA)J + ^13)x
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (Mj -f- (28.99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS .
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant
y;? , A „ • i
>:~"?P \-V.'/V (.-??••*-'-f-'sU.<•".
Date . '"/.-•^_M_fl:.-'- Sample Time /;'•'.'.;'> Barometric Pressure,
-
Moisture Content -•"Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading; ^ ^73", "g.ff5 ffi
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Keter Volume Sampled ... ' .
Average Meter Temperature . /£^ • °F
Average Meter Vacuum °*CQ "Hg
Average Meter Orifice AH &c Of\ "H,?O
Sampling Rate LPM
Barometric Pressure 3 Mster Crifics ^O "!-fg
Dry Gas Volume Sampled 3 70 °F, 29o92 "Hg ?.. p ?l ^ ,^ Ft3
/^v
___p pi
Water Vapor Volume -3 ?0 "F, 29,92 "Hg ; €>0O^-7 ?t^
Moisture Fraction, r^O '-^X -^ <"- Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA f./o . '..*
Moisture Contnt't -- !-'qthcd 2.
Dry Bulb Te:nr?. ^9 °F VJet Bulb Terr,p.___£7___F Dow Point Tempo , ES}.\ "Hg Stack Pressure 3O "Hg
Moisture Fraction, H?0 <:--'<- &€'•-_ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA . ^-f V''.'.>.._
Spec ific Gyayity
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = JO.^(;«CC23] +^.32(^02M +|0.26(->:i2 + CO^ =
Molecular Weight 3 Stack Conditions, Ms = f(Md)x(FDA)1 + f("l8)x(H20;U
twi ^« VTM> ««-J
Specific'Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (M ) -f- (2S..99) =
-------
PRELIMINARY CHECK FOR STACK GAS •
MOISTURE CONTENT AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Plant h W ^JtL£££_ Stack
,. "&~&&,fJ: <<•-./> -m A
f
Date ./•"• H.'o'. •".?'•'£ Sample Tims /4v^ " /ffJ?/' Barometric Pressure
Moisture Content — Method 1
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sasipled___
Average Meter Temperature
Average Meter Vacuum ^ __"Hs
Average Meter Orifice AH • ^''^ "H^O
Sampling Rate__ ^^ LFM
Barometric Pressure 3 Meter Orifice .^>jO "Hg
Dry Gas Volume Sampled 3 70 °F, 29.92 "Kg A & 3 Ft3
'Condensate Volune ,$ '/a $• pi
Water Vapor Volume 3 ?08F,'29,92 "Hg ' ' r?n ^?r?, Ft3
Moisture Fraction, K20__J^_^2_ Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA A f•'..'•'»
Moisture Cor.tf-nt -~ '.-^thcd 2
Dry Bulb Teaip. //4^F Wet. Bulb Temp, — °F Dew Point Temp._2 I
Vapor Pressure Of H20 '3 DP H.^;.N "H-; Stack Pressure ^.t^0^ "H
/^ // //^ ^'^ ft>
Moisture Fraction, K?0 >'>:» // Fraction Of Dry Air, FDA C*\ • •"'''
Sisecific Gvavitv
^j2 +
Dry Molecular Weight, Md = [o.^diCOgl] + J0.32(';to2^j +|o.?8(^j
Molecular V/eight 13 Stack Conditions, Ms = [(Md);c(FDA)] + [^18)x(H20}j =
Specific Gravity (Referred to air), Gs = (M ) -~ (28,99) = __
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
Gainesville., Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
„ - . r • «w» ft t ,i „..« *** -*>, c\ - . , / £rf' 1
Sampling Location ff/v'^X <> J>;Scftfg?,?£ /^y
Date t/'i&/~}J Run No, »JS
Ti:::0 Start' /?? --- Time End
Sar.oliag TiT.e/Point S~
F> VF 3 DP
Moj sturc/pJ^^ 3 ^-^iL/-»G35 Density Fact
•^.•"ovjvr.i.-. P;c5s3c> _"Hg, Stack Pres
'-','•• -.^''"her /"
lC!::p. °F,
Sample Box No.
V--r^
'no
-*Cn
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Meter Box Nc
iitot Corr. Factor
:\o~zle 3iG,_JJ^!'__i.n., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diajneter
Inside Area
Heieht ' "
in
ft 2
Initial Gas Meter Reading S^&-^f ^^
Total Condensate in Impingers J""/.^ ml
Moisture in Silica Gel /?.,*?€> gm
Silica Gel Container No._^jT_Fiiter No._7^
Orsat: C02
02
CO
N?
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
'C.-'. ' •?-,•?" '^P1
i u ,j. l i L ; 1 0 «
L
r s ^
^
r i
Distance
frdir, End
of Port
(in.)
C&*Ji
•
/D -^
[/0 //^ '
A? :/f
Clock
Tims
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
!?9$.'2.0
^ 03. 0
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
O&&
> 5%
Actual
..• -.
»4o
>(*c>
^L&L^
Stack Gas
Temp .
(°F)
Gas Sample
Temp.is Diy
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
73
?V
7a.
Out
. " »*'*
7Z-
73
73
Sample
Box
Temp .
TO
Last
Lm.pirger
Test
t°F)
72^
72-0
Vacuum]
on
Sample
Train '
C"Hg)
&6
V,o \
*0 \
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Di stan.ce
£ro7n-End
of Pott
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
C"H20)
Calc. I Actual
Stack Gas
Temp ..
Gas Sample
Temp ,8 Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
Inpinger
Tenp,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
-fiL-i
JQj:__/Oj
7/j-
5V
i /«/o \ /*/&
V I 7
.,—
\/.-66
/'
6
X t"
(&««
_C6.
77
77
* f1 ^^>
6 « O
Z)_
S?
t
. &
45
77
/p ^>,
.6;?
77
no
7/15-9
-------
, Ju\xJ
Plant
Gainesville , Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Locatiou^ytv? . JFry
Date__/./i£Zzlr _ Rtai No'
. Tl;ne Stc rtV/t» Tims End
Singling Time/Point
°F> ^M&r* YF 2 DP
J'Hg
M .? i s tur c/451 . FDA ££, Gas Density F ac t or
H-re:.,c,;.ic ^ressS^J'H--, Stack Press3&fc"Hg
?W/S
Meter Box. No,
Tenp.__ __ JF, K/D
Sample Bex No,
Xater ilL /^^Pitct Corr. Factory _ «J_
>.'oz?.lc --^-J^£_iTi. , Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
.Inside Area
Mat'l Processing Pvate_
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Readin
Total Condensate in Impingers _ ^f
Moisture in Silica Gel
\gm
-
Silica Gel Container No. ./ /liter No.
Orsat: CO-7
i, «, - . - . .•«.-'. ........ -.- ..... _-.-..——>.!-.-.,. »—.. --- ^.^-n-.... — — ... --- ,....,,... ... — .
02 __ , __ . __ ________
CO
Excess
Air
Test Conducted
ji>
Remarks: TT »
Height
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
2,
"7 /
Q / / « *^- •
£94. 2,3
& g ^ i &••*' '^**
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20).
." ,^j ft.
* •*•»* w
CAr"
%*?¥, i^ \ ,$y
iftJ* £j& "^ ^ / *
7* ^J *5 *» **£**
5?^cj ffii.33
s:s^
^ ^ ^ ... ,..,,«
&?G*/Q
» s^r
.ST*"
.£"$""
• %5^
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
,//
,//
»//
JJ
• I/
,//
• / U^
Actual
>//
///
-------
(Port and
jTraverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
("H20)
Calc. i Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp.QDiy
Gas Meter
In J Out
Sample j Last
Box j Impinger
Temp, i Tenro.
f°F)
Vacuum
on ^
Sample
Train
9
/O
15
3
5
g
s 1*;^
* v^ •Jfc'
lff
3 '*,.?$
<••
o
Bo $
a <
f a -*s> ; o s
_..
//.r
^/ i or.
7T
Kr\
"rl
75"
23
?,¥
•f> fj;
' <=7 / c'7><72?
^/* > /
//r
"
-------
1 /. ' 1
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant ptfp &
Mat'l Processing Rate
Ti;;:c Start /% 107 ftp7? Time End Jg .Va> /V>
Sampling Time/Point /«r£>
Sailing Location^;V^J^ff:ar^_j5^/J -^*
Dat- /~J'7 *- Run XQ..
Dp
::ro:-xrc '
~7«5,'Gas Density-Fact or
.#"Hg, Stack Press^S^'He
vi r^
Final Gas Meter Reading_
Initial Gas Meter Readin
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
f?
-'
Silica Gel Container No-^/^JFilter No.
2 ___
5;•?:,:.',c Box No, Meter Box No.
Meter AH-'.',xf^7'^_Pitot Corr, Factor (
Nozzle Llia, J4f?_in., Probe Length
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Hei ght
n
±'t2
ft
Orsat: C0
0?
CO
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by :
i //
en
Remarks:
_/2
| Pert and j Distance
1 Traverse j from End
| Point No.
i
!
i
of Port
(in, }
Clock ! Gas Meter
Time
J . . . i
\l /
•;' 3L
!\ 3
N ^
'i 3
ft ,<;
S"
/O
If
• 20
ef'°f
L / i 5*
/2^
/2.^
/ '2. —
•T- T^
L/2 "^
/ 3- '^
/'2.^~
y ""? *^^-l».
Reading
(ft-i)
F^3./y
£>?2o,i^D
__g2&^^
g*3 2. <$"
0 -J -' .' 0
i 1 1 1 -J 1 V-' .
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
^P i1*
*,*,, o
3/3
3.5"
•Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc. i Actual
!
/*?
/o *
/i^f'
3-5" j jQ &
3.3
f'*^
v. 0
Q f?
/» ^3
/t7, V*
\3 i C#
.5"/ <3
5"( t?
Ort
^ w
6'6
c5T,.
Stack Gas
Temp .
C°F)
//r
//&*
Gas Sor-ole ! Sample
Temp . 3 Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
76
77
&0
gz.
£T
(** f*
-------
'Stack Gas
| Temp.
I TO
jPort and
•Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
fin)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
("H20)
Actual
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas" Meter
f'F)
In Out
Sample
Box
Temp,
Last
i Vacuum
Impingeri on
Temp .
Sample
Train
-_
-------
PI
lar,t &«:
/
/I P {i /V7 / fit
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Samp 1 i ng Lo cat i on S'.n*/'2v\ X
Date /
Run No, /
I > i A <*" „ - / ' V? f
_//_, f-^ i'ime tna __/_/__r5
5c;:7liug Tir.ci/Foint / QZOmtn ~ ../2Ofn,'n*
D3 °F, WB °F, VF @ DP
Mat'l Processing Rate
| Final Gas Meter Reading /??, B/ I ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading //Q. #6 8 ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers>%33-',,
Moisture in Silica Ge.'
"S S
;.'c:" ture_/^__l, FDA_£^___, Gas Density Fact or
:ctric ::r.s*?
O.70
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff,
("H20j
Calc.
0.76 i
" ^
^ — :^L. s.__ — J — . ____^ —
Actual
2.3'/
8-*"
as
?2
Out 1
7*?
f>
72-
73
7-4
?4 (75*
— —
Cample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
,
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
64
£, *C
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train.
("Hg)
9,6
9 o
8*£
&& i 8. ,5"
IP &
^1 s»
/ &
7.o
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point Xo.
-
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
'
•(
-
2- /2 75-
Clock
Time
'i
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
1
/J^.-T
137.8
2 / 2.120 , /4/.3
3
/2 '.2$
B /2:3o
1 3 ! /Z '.35*
' 3
4-
4-
jLT-'-to
/*-'•+£'
12. '. 50
•3- L/2-:$s_^
4~ 1 / .' 00
5* / os
j 5- /.'/0
o / : is
5"
6
4
&
£
/', 20
/; ir
/ '. 30
j : 3f
/ : 40
/ :4£
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
0,44
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20) !
Gale. I Actual
o.44 I
/.^s-
1*56
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
//£
//6
' J4+& & 0^4 \/,bt> l/(o
/4B.3
0.4&
I5L& 6.&6>
1 " '
9 ,-*> ^* ^-^
A5b , 3
0.46
/56.S &0.4S
X62.3
I&S.&
0,44>
10,46
/U.3 \<**46>
/75../ SM.52-
117,7
/S/.4-
l£$,lo
0.52-
0.52- ,
O.S2-
/BB'B XO.&
'IJZ.S
/ '/ f.n t
/ / ',-J 0 <>-»
19?. B//
OS%~
o^^-
032-
l<60
/.6>0
/, l>d
/. &0
/, &6
11 (o
Ilio
LLh _,
// fe
/U>
/>&£> 1 11 (o .
i// 60^
J.&6
/>B$
// 6
11 &
\\f
iL£$ \L!&
LAM_
0, 7S
l>&®
i .BO
I, BO
11*
nf
H4--
/Af-
f/4-
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(r'F) i
In
Out
•
e
76 !
?7 !
7^3 u
*7 X
oL_
7^
77
r?7l 7a
Sample j
Box i
Temp. 1
(°F) !
i
/^>PJ7^
JoJi
/ot
lot
105
f9
80
£0
Bt
IOS'BI*
/(&'
JOZ.
$2-
9^
JC>t%2^
IO&B3
!02\ 83
/63
/£f
/ojr
94
94
85-
Last 1
Iinpingeri
Temp,
C°F)
&(*
&&
L4-
Vacuum
on ^
Sample
Train
t
?.o
7.°
8,0
6Z 8^
loZ^,^
'(ol- 8-.^ ;
^-2-
6>1-
B^
e*f
(ot \,B^
to2- 3>-->
&0 /0*0
(oO
LO
Go
&o
6 a
/6O
£>
-------
Run No,
Plantjvv^ . .
x"« *' / & **? /t
Sampling Location S'"f&if0n__ X '
Date
Ti7.i3 Stait .
Sampling Tinie/Point^^c^^^^^Mto^-
DB °F, KB °F, VI-' @ DP "Hg
L,._kOM^,.JAL ^,^lNEE^Jo, ^w,'
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DAM SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Time End S"/ £
:'-•.••t.u;e/<9J%rU $2_,Gas DensityFsctor
ix-•j.ncti-ic IressJOj'Hg: Stack Pres^££j'ilg
Terp, °F, IV/D ,W/S
Final Gas Meter Reading
ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading / ^fj, $ /J ft3
Total Condensate in J1'ipingers *?\5 ~2A
Moisture in Silica C -
S;-'7:!e Box X
Meter Box No.
Meter dii; /pO ritot Corr. Factor /?,
Silica Gel Container ^o ,^_/J___Fi Her No,
Or sat: CO7
u, — I,,, i ,,—.,._._._-,».., ...i , .—„...—_..._. -..—...•. •-—• '. .-•.—".—-—.
02
CO
Excess
Air
N'czrie LUa.,_25^in. . Probe Length ^ ft
Probe Heater Setting
3tao<- Di:r.c:v£ions: inside D;£meter___J?_
Inside Area ~~~^
Height
Test Conducted by:__/^,_^/gc.^
Tt2
" ft
RemarKs :
.: ^ •
rcrc ana
Distance
'I ^averse from End
Point No,
L..
/
y
f
/
2
?.~
of Port
(in,)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter Stack
Reading
(ft^j
3 I -f ^
4-5"
/ ^^ /I//
/ / f f \^/ f *
f tJ f
2.&6* I
v^ 1 2/2* !
Vvj* ! *^** t *- •*• E i
5"5" i £ ^ 6 • *-
-•' 4'oo
/OjT
Z/? „ 7
Meter
Velocity Orifice
Head
C"H20)
f*r i) (ff C*'
fj, (9 Cs
O,£?Q
n ,60
O,4~2-
f *
Press, Diff.
C"H20)
Caic.
,
i
Actual
2. JO
2,./£
*• -.* *• *
\2-J~6
/<£&
/ >£
Stack Gas
Gas Sample
Temp „ i Temp . 9 Dry
(°F)
L //S"
11$
ll£
/ 1 f '
-US'
-ULT
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
Out
i
•7,3
$7
^o
73
93
7 ft
76
73
7?
7?
Sarnole i Last
Box iLnpirger
Tenip, ! Test
(c
3F)
j
I
1
i
( F)
(0&
(*G
_JoO
I'^o
Vacuum
on
SaiHole
Train
("Hg)
6,0
6 . €?
4 , •€>
h '&& Ls^^
bd
v5?c;
-------
F
ort and
STr averse
''Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff ,
("H20)
Stack Gas
Temp,
Gas Sample
Temp.QDry
Gas Meter
Sample
Box
Last
linpinger
Temp- I Temp.
TO
Actual]
I In
Out
Vacuum !
on ^
Sample
Train
£23, 0
o
9
£c*>
i?
A
4
.:f..
4
-i
4'/o Z^^.- 3
^1_Z/^
±L£OLW
\/
99
Bo
^H!
55-
M£.
o
6
?
9.
-------
'
Gainesville. Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Lccation__/37^|j
Time Start
Time End
Samp 1 ing Tinie/PointJ^^Jg_;j^^L£
°
F, T>VB CF5 VF @ DP
"K
-•tri- PressNj/? "Hg, Stack Press2£O !'Hg 1
Readier
Temp °F, W/D __,W/S
cc.,./pNe £cx No, Meter Box No.
Nozzle Dia,i252? in.. , Probe Length
£t
in
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reaaing__ ^ftff-^_S^. ^t"">
Total Condensate in Iinpingorsv^^^~^rc?5^3X^l
TJ27.<* " ~"
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No,
Orsat: C0?_ jO»_2,.
02^^, "'
rn
4_V-/
M
Test Conducted by-__/^.
| "Iraverse I from End
Point No. ! of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
Reading
o cacK
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20j
Calc. jActual
remp,
(°F)
l emp, is Dry
Gas Meter
in
Out
Box
Temp,
TO
Test
TO
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C'Hg)
_Z
*...
i
-I
ooo
IQ
a 5-4
A
1A%-^2A
' /*i"?
77
J
SB
s
SB
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
!
i
2.
2
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
to '5o
-l/-jj>
! .3' ^4-0
Gas Meter
Readi ng
(ft3)
.
$j £ i ) /e fi) 1 // O
Gas Sample
Temp «Q Dry-
Gas Meter
In
Out
Box
Temp.
-7$'
?'? i 7^
Last
Lnpinger
Temp ,
__4it
Vacuum
on >
Sarcpie
Train '
i
7*.O
/ /! j -7 ^
f^'- 1 ./. <^>
A.tT-2,5'
-------
L, W
fi\)'f.,
n1 + >"? / / " / - / •'
r.u iv:.!..__ /^V^A'-''^ / fA-fr^t,' -^ '^'"> :_
Sai^pling Location/V.--c^ &_&tdJ-'i
Z_£ Ron No, /
t .. KUXJI(__ ..Kl. 1 }i\tE.,..-,£, !.,-.«
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Time End_
S.ir.pling Time/Point
DB °F, tVB CF, VF @ DP
, Ga s Density F act or
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in I^pingers^-3*^5l5_^3j^l
Moisture in Silica Gel_^/j^.r ^.^ > " ^ gni
Silica Gel Container No,_4_t:/ Filter No._^
j Orsat: C02
I 02
Terr.p. ^J_jO_^ F, V-r/D
Sr:-cle Box Xc.
iMeter iiox No.
^/.j;./,_?! tot Ccrr. Factor ___j
Nozzle Dia, ^' in,, Probe Length ^ '-.p^ft j
Prcbe Heater Setting
Stack Dirr.enrions: Inside Diajneter Go in
Inside Area_
He :ight
tt2
" ft
Exces s
Aii-
Test Conducted by: ^/ _J^e..,~^^
_^A._C^T""~"
Remarks :
• •
Port ana
77 averse
Point No,
.
2-
3
•'•"?'-
r
L L. -
L_7
Distance
frcrn End
of Port
(*-~~0
-- *"— »— -
/- '-<£- ?
.-
0./4
r,. -ir
r_^_ ? /
i"' s"c
fi,(--t
'^ti.
Clock
,£-W3'W-~*~"
, , A. -J)
^- T ;-''•'-
-r/ ,i! «•
(•//'i-
._- —
//; ,:,,
2 0 i
3r:
_lf " '
TO '
hu i
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
__
^^^ -^
r>""l *J,\.$:f
3*f9.0
3*-?_ <
.35- 7 . /
-^6f ,(v
JUG 0
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
2-4 o
2.30
^ "10 __J
p ^o
1-^0
I 2 |-c
Me
Ori
Pres
("
Calc.
*^-«-
/9.6t?
0.^.9
a e o
I1 to
/<6o
*ll?J"J
ter
fice
s. Diff.
H20)
Actual
X
s*( t r-
( >_ |j (./
c-.-v.^
c?. /, c)
r i-c
,-••• fcr:
j^/iL,
Stack Gas
Temp „
C°F)
V
^3 ,
^3
9r
<^-?
,r
96~
Gas i
Temp
Gas I
(°I
In
V
73
yrj
^t?
?o
/(?/
l/f- 6
3a:iiple
@ Dry
leter
3)
Out
77
79
S7
5' 5-
OS
J J
fn
Sampi e
Box
TeriD .
(CF)
\ -/
\ /
\/
h
/\
/ Vi
' \
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
7>
7A
76
fy'?l
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No-
Distance
from End . j
of Port
(in)
;
& / S9
"7 _jL SS
Clock
Time
90
SO
• ^-- \ 2.#o 90
i // 1 Z./4-
\ X2- ! 1.-iC
\ Z3 LJL -3/
/ X» f ..
i
1
.
I
!
<
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
ibfLOi
373 ,5*
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
/.b
/A
.077.3 ! /.fe
iDii \3'SI, £
/(o J3SS-. -?
ll'O |3?r/,6
/.7
/.9
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc. ! Actual
QAO
0,4 C1
j!L3_2A-QAo_>
o ^o
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F)
!
^
9.r _J
o.^o 9;r
rO.^3 1 t1 ^3i 9"3
^^9 > 6AB °,^
A 9 O/^ t).^-? 1 95
i , i____ ^
1
f
|
i
!
Gas Sample
Temp.QDiy
Gas Meter
TF) i
In i Out 1
ju&2_
I'M
i/O
Sample i Last
Box \ Inrpinger
Temp, i Temo.
C°F) (°F)
•
97 \ / V1
/co \/ ?3
Vacuun
on
Sample
Train
3.L.
^3
I0! )( H !:5.f
iv$\ r^Z- / \ ££.- ;3.^
w ;
/^?i
J^L
loi
1 \ 79 4./
/ \ 7C/ -n,/
,-^"^7- ^
i !
. .
—
j
i
i
i
f
-------
EN. ...)NML.~I B'.^JfeERl^J iiC,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SFEET
(\->
P1""t A-••-. /- , f ' / •> • »
r i - -• it /j£•£> /. fa '...-.A.J.:.y.;3.<_
Sampling Location
Date /'__r;rj;_< — 77- Run No, 2--
Mat'l Processing Rate
rir-j Start -^ //;":.i_<:"/,,.a ime End "<-/7 4
Sampling Tiii',c/Point___ / f , ? ,,C?2."_|_2.C
DB °F, KB °F, VF @ UP "Hg
>;.:jst.;:re jX.I,FDA ,Gas Density F act or_
..;, --jr. cLr.: c Press."fO'"i5g, Stack Press;
- ^er_.jL^A*L :
H
» 1V'/D
Meter Box No,
Final Gas Meter Reading
ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading ,3 ^f":
Total Condensate in ImpingerS'jV^ •'•''---^Jj^jpi ^^_
Moisture in Silica Gel
-'"
'•..•-;er AH2 /. 7_2_ i'itct Corr. Factor g- /">
Nozzle Diav./|^__in. . Probe Length 4-'-£> ft
Probe Heater Setting |
St...ci: Uinensions: .[fiside Diameter 3fi in
""~ ft2
.^ £t
Silica Gel Container No, j^//- Filter No.7_2 /l_£l/
- t'\'.
* or ^ 3,11 G
j raverse
Point No,
/
'?
3
| (" .
j
Distance
r.^^.,,., n-,.H
1. i v_.llx l-i*U-
o£ Port
(inO
— —
o»,;4
^). ^5L_
[G_J12___
0.5*0
' /- 1 5, 67
7
/"! 9 9
* j i / /— •
PI o^V-
O J.\./*v-iV
Time
l^J
Jlfi'.i- ,
/•JltMitf^
/•f?
/
•x^?
o -'
_, -
^ /A "7
•7 o
/ ,• ^
2, /
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
#.*•*
$,&>
n,£
&•?£
C:h£
f', 5 '<
Actual
e. <-,
t,^
& !>&
f^fl
*.&J
o.^>
Stack Gas
Temp .
C°F)
9'7
97
t/7
9/r; i
c/ %'
^L^
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
/^
ts
*7-£
/
/• /
^.
&?
i' .""
t r.
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
LnpLrger
Test
(°F)
& .
{-<
X.s"
f- •< '
/ /--"
/ -, *%
t. v^>
Vacuum |
on j
Sample
Train
("Hg)
/, 4
l,.<
£*£_
r3. a
?. -2_
^ l?-.-\_
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
.
a
^i
Distance
from End
of Port
fin)
t
I <<9
* 5 «*•? i
I ! / .--' "->
l; /. <-'.^
10
i i
3.. OD
ii /4~^
Clock
Time
///£••- '-/
/^%-)
itt:'it>>e-l/
'7o
tio
Gas Meter
Reading
(£t3)
^/^ ">
^-:L3^L^
/ <-•
i
t
1
1
i
\64~
J4 _-
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
3. o
3 0
3_-L
;?„ x.
'? C'
^r^^.O
•3 o~"
I
j
ii ii
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
pi
i I'l
i—'^i
'IS
S;i
c .-.
„/'_'
v~>
'. r
JK-
St
G, /"'i /?
ant DO^DH/V-' ^~'W£AI. C-o .
,;,~Iin;~ Location ', j'^/*rf"V •oC!x:;,:>
te //ii,/77-. Rjn No, 5
me Start /O'OO Time End/^
rpling Tme/ Point /$ //I/A/
C ;;•• T^--. Or- T T- a r\r->
*•• , ••.-.; r, Vr .j ut-
ii-ureX^- c,rUA ,Gas Densitx'F
rc.ietric Press^}"i!g, Stack Pre
,.-vr (^i.^'»- /^//j?
c.**?jT"-'-, "./D JVS
-,,plc jJox .'o. ;-eter Box Xc
ter l-^U^- Pitot Corr. Factor
•,~io Dia. */^T in., Probe Length*
t
o;:s K:at'.r: Sotting
ack Dimensions: Inside Dianeter
Inside Area
Height *xx .^^
Mat'l Processing Rate
(..xJjWiM
,;^)^
/AO
'"ig
act or
SSA.5^ "Ug
/ x> Filter No. /£$3
Qrsat: C07 ,O
o2 .2az
CO
% ?
Excess
A: r
Test Conducted by: ^/ . ID UMc.AtJ
««*-€- y*>t
(.5 f C-< V^ ' ^ -n?
^^k- p — 77^
A//1ZT £J~Sj& D -~~r && c,L &,$&
~rFn> S~i~&rl'—Aj ' An ^^ /^V 4// )
I'ort ana
Traverse
Point No,
/
L_?
*3
/
*>-
oT
-
.7 ]
Distance
from End
of Port
fill,"!
C-t,
— - -
d/f
u_jQJL5T
d. ;5 7
. D«$o
& Li—\
O,? 7.~-
Clock
Ti:-He
LAfiS^O
<^-^-->
///«£
— —
/^
3<5
30
-fo
^.C
^'' .
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
,
4-f .1 1
L^iL.1
f j; . 5*
^o 5;. ^J
/.'r.r;
4.>-k,-y
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
a „ 4
a. 3
*V« «et
» «• i,
nr^
fLlJ:
•"[. o.k
Me
Ori
Pres
C"
Calc.
-v — '
£5?
A,^
6..^
^,57
O..S-1
a 54
ter
fice
s, Diff.
H20)
Actual
^___
0.5•.-• • --.^ j
Stack Gas
Temp ,
C°F)
~c ,
?£>
Q /
/' *
?/
^1
92.
O ! •
* 1
Gas :
Temp
Gas' J
(°I
in
•—
73
^^
fy—f
a *
?2
??
/;-/<>
ianple
9 Dry
Jeter
')
Out
"7J
_2^
7?
9;£)
cr^
<-f -J
r.- ,:J
i i,?_;_^_
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
\ -^^
\
\
•,
•,
..
Last
Impirger
Test
C°F)
« — .
A3
h 65'
^4
/r-5"
^5*
^>7
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C"Hg)
»—
5,/
2.?
24
*•«. *f
>C. v?
2 'i
i&,» . »
«. r-s
ji2i^2LJ
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
!
Distance
from End
of Pert
4'ir.j
-?c«-
i 0 f,5?
? /, us
to l 2--°®^
It 3L.I4
\ ;z j 2-25"
Clock
-Time-
-70
Sfr
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
4fcSc3
47 •?- 0
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
A 7
Afe- __
~ „ 4 ~ g- ! •' \ / A
tyO { T /<. -'- /" v?
/a£> i 47*?-^.
/ "7
it /
Meter
Orifice
Press -Biff,
("H20)
Calc,.
frff*
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
(CF)
/5.4X. J ?'Z
Gas Sample!
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
r:'F)
In
Out |
j
lot ^!;
Sample
Box j
Temp. |
!
Last
Iimjinger
Temp ,
(CF)
\ &%
Vacuum
o
on . '
Sanple
Train
f?,g»
ft AO \O4-Q t 92-. S /Ol ?2- i ^? j^,^
0.40
&.4Z
6.46>
o 7^ ^1 £ c> ,^t • _ ^ ^ |2 -^ g
^? y
i £~~~
//£ i-4i5, | "/. f ^,45; O.'-fS' i 93
; /^ i ^..^ /#& j
/ 7"
• - ••
i
i i
•
.. . .
!
i
_
« —
^7.
* -^* y f . *
//2/J O-c?
/ U'i^ , / /.V _
^.-47' ?3 !/^r;;
__^ i — -
1
—-.
1
O . fi
j
S ~?';^ 31.5"
_ • — — •— —
1
_
!
i
!
-------
Plant _ 4W den Ch &m,- Cfi \S
Scrriplin<] Location? *'V>7*
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
Ti;.:c Start {/ ! 6"*5 Time Znd__J£l_S'i>
Sampling Tl.?.e/Point /^T^m @^ ~ /^
; i.i /7.:*' °:'" Klj_ "_^'';s ^ '£*$?* >B~?
?
:;.- ••-•:;. ^J.uT.Vj^T^.-as De^lt/F^tor
;-. rc;::evric Press 3fipjngc:s _*•}'_,
Moisture in Silica Gel O'^0
_ft3
ml'
Silica Gel Container \'o.6
Or s it: C0:
02
CO
N2 „
Filter No.
>;-'"pJo J-Vx .">'o. Meter Sox .NO.
.Meter AHSjyssO Pi tot Corr. Fac. to x Q'J33
:v?;:2le Dirir'j:2Slin., Probe Length & ft
)lacK iv:.,',;tnsions: ^nsiae _^_-*_--;
Inside Area 2^0 ft2
Height
Air
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
PiClD
P^rt and
Traverse
Point No,
:
1 /
/
/
7
L. "2
"">
Distance
from bnd
of Port
(in,)
.
.
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
I3I5-OJ
[3'>1L5
\LZl^o
|3I3S^
.'?,' ••> ,-s
,' i. ' , , •; tJ
u-2^f ?
^J^,?
975-V^
?v
f 2- .; '
,27
1^)6
u^~~
« 05"
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
C"H20)
Calc. j Actual
• S3
r t'
j ^ -;;
• S3
•^
7.^", hos"'
*^
t 2-
' 2-
&1
i .!> i
i tf^L^
^
u_-* ••---
Stack Gas
Teiiio,
f°p
V. -1 ^
?r
-76
__25"
PTr
-.. .;
/ -^
Gas Sajnple
Tenip.8 Dry
Gas Meter
_ (°F)
In
//f
//5':
W
IW
fo^i
Mf?
;t J -.v
Out
j
/0y
/^//
/
-------
JFort and ' Distance
[Traverse | from End
'Point No, | of Port
i fin]
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Meter j Stack Gas
Orifice j Temp.
Press. Diff, j (CF)
C"H20) |
Gas Sample j Scinple j Last
Temp .3 Dry < Box ! Impinger
Gas Meter | Temp- \ Temp.
)' '' V ~\ 1 C c t~ > ' f 3 V *\
I F) | ( r) i ( 1-)
Vacuum
on
Sarnie
Train
4-
-t
A.
(0
S
S
l~6f
9
-------
_..TlRC..-.llTAL ~.l3INl~JNG, ...,1,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
PI
i IP
I:
S-0
b-J
I'?
^ • i
* '-i
*vi'i
\>
Pi
Sl-
ant / J#ftLp*£rAJ fcJhtyrdCft 1$ • Mat'l Processing Rate
~".- in;; Location S'~ft'fl$fJ '--
te 1 /'7-S'/7-2- Run Xo. X'-
Tie Start /S',-'1'Q Time End \J\$0
Tiling Time/Point A^ &• Q 'Z~ j2& fsv^^-^^A
**' i D": '•"; '" f- \T: 3 Tip <~ "7 > "Mrr
* — ' •> } ' -' r } ' - '- *- - :,>'/** ' -C-
;.;ri,r;. ^> %,FT)A *^ "7 , Gas Density Face or
rcr-.etric Press 3£»!'Hg, Stack Press^ ^ "Hg
-;:;.jr C/C^^ ^ uJa-^^
• , •• * | - j (V' ^ f ' / -j
r.ipJe i>jx No, Mete?' Box No.
ter AH^/«6> Pitot Corr, Factor'!* 3
-P. . «n igf - TN , T , it
o'j" i :r> ^c" Set^'i'.o +~~"
* ^" '/ X ^5
ack Dimensions: Inside Diamet'j:-_j'M/>>fc -'in
Inside Area ^ O Ft 2
HP i crh+- tC ft
• l~ -• £,* J '•" *J — U
Ax'
Final Gas Meter Reading /O t>&* &S &3 ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading / o & < b <2 O ^t"3X'-
Total Condensate in Impingers *S £ ml&i
s\ *"*•* J
Moisture in Silica Gel / O f ^) grn
Silica Gel Container Xo,/-,^3 filter No. 72-^3 f,"
Orsat: CO?
09
CO
i'i 7
,,
jbxcess
Air
Test Conducted by: 7"*"t- "TtfCK.C^
' t\ i~f
*
Remarks : ~J~f{ (P~~ PiCtcl..
",
Port ana
Traverse
Point Xo.
i
•2-
•3
5
i
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
t-'l \ '
Clock
Time
1 7-34"
lino
l(s> l5£
}M-3
)4:2*T
J&\16
p: :^"
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
.
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/0$&6$(J( ,2&
/O2f-^
/L/72'7
_jjp^ff, 3
/& SS'Jo
I & v/, 5"
/ 17
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
^^ 1 r-
L^o-lC.
Actual
/fo$\ i.ffsr
r^U ^^
_. , *»*, a t *
* O'3> i ! vy-
/***' *^ / /^ j*"
3 -^f i / y1*^
j*"3* #t "*"
«^5
1 '/,-?
?,fc/
-<. 5'
, /^
* y.f5
'"j.r/
.5"* £3
/^ /";. ci ! A6> i6. 1 1*/ -6'
Temp,
€>/
&l
f) '
SI
% /
f /
tr ;
' > /
U. . .- -^ 1
Gas Sample
Temp . 9 Dry
Gas Meter
re
in
/Q(o
/&b
}0b
fO$
Out
f ¥
q if
9 //
r/-
C-'4-
•. D *
/<:.<: ^^
Sample
Box
Temp «
Last
impinge r
Test
<55"
ftT2r.
76
70
6" ^
Vacuum]
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
7
7 j
/9 '
"X ,f '" •'"•
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
fin)
*••>
U
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
'
<^ fr*~
7 f f- v)
&F\-3 « 5£J
y &<&&
, \
)
i
t
„__
t
i :
'
i
1
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
o?
-------
Pla
it "Bo / 4 £A"V C h C mjle^
' ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING/
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Time Start_J/Uj_0_0 ___ Time End_J2i00
Sailing Tiiae/Point
. .
— » i
x ;-••- V ir : O_ :i , FC Wf f _, '.'as Dens; ty F r~t c r __ !
Be. •.;!.£ trie Press 3_0'Ug, Stack Press^3Oj:Hg
Mat'l Processing Rate_
Final Gas Meter Reading / W/ , •
Initial Gas Meter Res
ft3
ft3
/£ * S
Total Condensate in Inpingtts .-.-^'.5,
Moisture in Silica Gel_
Silica Gel Container Nc
Orsat: COo
02
Excess
Meter ^HSj^___Pitot Corr, Factor ^(j'V>-
-—*"-—-—"*"-• _^
X^::le Dia. j^Z.£_Jn., Probe Length Jf ft j
.'i ;D" Hearer Setting ^__Ci^y \
__>„ : -1-™ «• r ..r—_ . -- . -,--,-._,_..,_ -"" V n- -•" [
Stack Dinensions: Inside Dia^eter'4BJ^_^_^in |
Inside Area g'Q ' ft2
Height .4,
Test Conducted by:
ft
1 ravers e
Point No.
i
1 3 j
1 -4
6
\ f
\
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
Clock
Time
\\*Af
(L'3 d
|/;/^
li:oo
_I£!iK
lO'.^ft
ir'.i'j
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
|?1 * •*]$$
J1S1L.
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Oc/lf
Me
Ori
Pres
Calc.
0-70*
- • - !"• • •
/*• A 9
(j i '.rf ,-.^
/S 2-9 1 £>*£"&
H7« ^
o. 5" -I-
0.7 j
2*"/3
2*7
|31-,'l 1 0, °l*s J3« 6»
) ! <- , , - j f> . .':•' ' . [ ? ;7
ter
fice
s, Diff.
Actual
o«?>-
^A2_
Oi i
-l-T-r
n.7
.?'?'_,
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
72
12.
"1 2*
7 X-
7^
7*1-
bas barbie
Temp.cJ Dry
Gas Meter
In j Out
i
J/ftl/^
1^
lib
1/4"
/fl ?~
r«-.'
f^
9s?1
/ f**r^
i**"1 >*•**
_2,o
t-^J/"
banpie
Box
Temp.
("F)
Las c
Lnpii-ger
Test
vacuum
on
Sample
Train
C'Hg)
gd \ if!
T§~
__yf>
&&
(oO
(sO
_A5L_i
*3-
/O
3
10
7
-------
Port and | Distance
Traverse j from End
Point Xo, i of Pert
| (in,
g \
!
s
1
-
! j
Clock
Time
/O \£$
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
/O 3- » /O
f} n ^ ,~ (S
-
- "" -
i
j
i
i
; i ' •
i
•
i .1
! j
i
l..
Stack
Velocity-
Head
C"H20)
A, 5*0
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
C'H20)
CalCc J Actual
%•&&
1
Zg'f?
'
Stack Gas
Temp,
'.
*7Z •
! i
\ \
>
i
i
Gas Sample!
Temp.QDry
Gas Meter j
In Out j
V
Saiiple
Box
Temp .
1 l
i
Last
Impingevj
Temp ,
f f
f/f~> ~*
Vacuum |
on 1
Sample j
Train !
i
5
*} •rr-* I
~~" !
9
i
"""" ! r !
i . > -• - t
i
i i
i
i
... l.l... Ml.,-.- J
I
1
i
!
i - - -
;
i
|
-------
Plant
Wv
.. 1lRQ..-JiTAL ~,tlNL_.J!NG,' -.1,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
I Final Gas Meter Reading
if- 7"2- Run No, /
Ti,v;e Start_j7j_£]0Am_Time End_2j^Or3
Sapling TiirA/Point___J^ ~?~~
3?.-or;:etric Press-20_"Hg, Stack PresiVT^'Hg
/•» £?^ 4
! Initial Gas Meter Reading f~^'jS\i_;
Total Condensate in Inpingers l_^>Ji
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No, oj>/w>_Filter No.£,1
Crsat: C02
02
GO
JPitot Corr. Factor t_
Xc~2le Dia._/25jln., Probe Length ff
ft
Height
Port- qn-1
• " - - «••'• —
Traverse
Point No,
rasf /
2,
3
/*
5~
i .''
!_ -/ "
from End
of Port
(in.)
^__ ,
>_
n ^'"k
Time
// ,^*^^
/ / f <* "»<% ',1
/2!.-,v>/u_l
nu±__>
A ** "
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
£r* . f
1 4# •
4'«*^ * -"j / # /^
/ &<*. 6
^,f, 4
47Z^
/,?7 . 3
6T Z* ^
Qf-ick
i-j1 L-CJ-V-iN.
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
•V
i 2-sf
»<4
Ao
,?5'
4fo,
| 0^,
Me
Ori
Pres
Calc.
tg-f
J'f
/.3
3./
3.0
,. <*
3.Z
ter
fice
s. Diff.
Actual
c S'9
/ g"*?
/.3
uJ"/
3,o
**& S?
**" , ,,
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
J07
Gas J
Temp
Gas 1
(°]
In
7£/
*? Vt
7<
'?/.
*~j/'
L.L&
l»1
/ *
Sample
. 3 Dry
leter
Gut
,
/*72.
73
73
-; -?
/ .,,?
**t *^
Supple
Box
Temrj ,
(°F)
• " - ~
^~, — . — ,
Last
Lnpuger
Test
(°F)
•?>k
v5%
15*4
— -^.
5^S"
{.C7
^™"> ^,
— 1
Vacuum.
on
Sample
Train
C'Hg) |
!
?,.s"
/o
ft£
IBS*
J5
/?-
-------
Uraverse
SPoint No.
t
Distance
j £rc:n End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"K20)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff,
("H2C)
• Stack Gas
: Temp.
Gas Sample' Sample { Last
Box
j impinger; en v
j Gas Meter I Temp, iTemp. (Sample '
Gale, | Actual
131—J
j In i Out j
(°F) iTrain |
I!
_r_
7
•*» « or> /**"
« •
Ul^jij
U,
L^
"i if ^ -/
^'. •*? i ^). '-> !
'_^_":' i », • ;_
f*' I I "^ "/ !
3C">
» ( )
A
a. B i 3
_vi_ .«_!••'.»_:,•
7;?
. jj__t)j_
¥.3 V-.3
~T
JLU&.
I ^ n> if\
.eL.i—L-^^.
, 9
.3-D
a, 9
7 i
2-7
3.6
/_<_*)
Ur
ss //
^1
S3
" i'**
5
^
-7.
"7
-------
.mo1
X*i
./
A /I
ft
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Tine Start 3 ,'?>.
_Time End
5"
Me i s turc;2V$[3 . FDr\2l/_i &£ Density Factor
BFron;ctric_ Press_J|;MHg, Stack Pr
f- /.-
io:r;p, '•}• , \\i\j ,ft/b
Sample Box No,___ __ Meter Box No.
Meter ,iH5 ___ Pltot Corr, Factor
No?zle via*J
Probe Heater Setting
in i
TZ- •*) '~».™.
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading ^/^ 21 .*
*- J-»^_~—,»&*» JSCv 2C*t««^™v.
Initial Gas Meter Reading ^
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No,j^aj^Filter No,"
Orsat: C02
0?
Test Conducted by;
f t3
Remarks:
Stack Gas j Gas Sample- Sanrole I Last
Temp.0. Dry
Box I Impinge r- on j
Temp. Test jSample!
r °v*\ f°v* T-v*-1;.-! !
( tj ( rj 11 din j
^l^_xi^.4_Zl
-------
Port and
Traverse
?-jii:t Xo.
-
o
/
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
£V/, 4
rj ( t? • vj
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
i
'??
« f ^
/. £
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
("H20)
Calc.. ) Actual)
e-^J ! ^9^
<[Jiv' f v=^ , *1«? « ^^
3. o 3- a
Stack Gas
Temp .
*
Gas Sample-
Tenip.SDry
Gas Meter
PF)
In | Out
Sample ] Last i Vacuum
Box • impinger on
Tcinp- 1 Te:nDt Scunnle
("fj .j (CF) Train
i i
/ •"*/ ^ i CV I "7 V ' 1 /c"/, | O t^
ff^Jfj ,V^ ! / / • ! «.J,o .L^-O
" " j' *." . j
j f^. j.-*' j f?-> ^
»•» « *» -•« > r - f>s ' r, i i "i • i • i /.--1 - ^ /<• —
,rt. £, \ O-. ?*-• /'.;vt. [/.' ! / /! ! 5 :? •/•-', iv
I ^;^ "^ ; ^ P ; ^ * 6 I /«•<&•- i "-?•> 4> ' t-3*- & / ^ «- >y ^ i <* <« i i O tf& < //• -J!
j" "; '~"i "~ '
I 4T , $ 3 j t* t'Z-f 2
' ..--" » ; ^ C" (', f* /
' !
/.Z * 3.S 3. £ /Og
/. / |3.^ i 3,(A !/£>f
'r 1 S";/,S~ g'vTJ.^ (.t~ |3,7 3*? | /&3
/*"
/
—;- j
*_
L T~
lr. F~ "
^ /
/ :t-
;fT^l>
L !
4
\
5! 10
5" I •z.C
.5"; =6
j^jfr.7
5^3, g
/ ; /jT^ vO t /
**to^' * "vs&Jr--^ /J ,/ ""< • »j>^
5 .' "--r"
•^"15*0'
5"Ji*5'
4',^a-'
$Tj ~&
i /,-=; <7 ! P" /
/.€$ <^, ^-» s-'f -"- j /tJ-4 IO«
,f7 3,0 1 3,a | /08 |f/
"7ns
/, 3
A J
A3
A3
77
1 ga /> j /* f-«*
u / \ •*-• "•••" ! ' '' v3
.
U""" ,-?
••>
"•--' ~, —
f \J
fff > t r~.
&& \ //„&
77 ! **C?- ! 7/l^
^••» « 1 , - - x«% , ' «-n~«
"^ ^ ^'i ^ i Av;'7 - ^ i "X -*1
4-.# CCo 1 /^-f 5*/
•y. o V- €>
-^. a ^. o
&8 ty'G
& ® ¥-6
i
/Q$
/6t
101
107
%*
$1
f?^
$2.
7^ r*^
/i / / ^* ^
4^ A / «** c %-^
CJ^ '^? ff « J^ *" ^
S^ '."-^ r •fc^''* ft£
a"f /^^
i
I
-------
o • __/^;7ie nt_ •L:
Gainesville, Florida
;OURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
±,,J\:I ],-, ><
-j ._, -, .„ // , /
2., u ^.f fL
Mat'i Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /: No. -^ J-tter Box Ko._2.__
'•.vt;.-r uH; !%~]fOj?-'UU (]-orr. Factor Gt. S",3_
Xonzie Dia,*-^5 in., Probe Length ^
Test Conducted b:
£
#5 to in
:t
—!—
! Point No, | of Port
(in.)
!±5...n/_
! Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
-------
o
D
Port and i Distance
Traverse from End
•:cint Xo, • of Port
| (in)
k
5*- $ I
i
70 ;
// !
/ *?*• i
Clock
Time
/£,'^>
/£-.^/iX
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
^ {/v£". €>
/^""^ /• f f\ &>
% ". ' t , y/
A^:^ ! ^;f#.
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H70)
I
Meter j
Orifice !
Press. Diff, j
C"H20) .
Calc, j Actual!
Stack Gas
Temp.
(CF)
Gas Sample |
Temp.GDiy j
Gas Meter 1
1 r^ - - i
in j Out J
^
Sample Last Vacuum
Box I Impinger; on
Temp- Temp, j Sample
(•F) 1 C°F) jTr^n
i 3
75 !
/ < ! «• A-
/ z* tv.** ! / "^^
*^f" ^^ 1 7 C •?
/. o 3.2. ' 3*^ /^f y'5 j' /v? i ^^/
Jyj Li^/ i ^'V //o ^6 1 75
/./
3» ¥• 5. ^ ///
//:®o ?b>f, / ^ /.I- !3.g i3;S ///
f/ i 7^ i
*. '
4>5" !
JL.&-.
^,<" ! /*
^5^ ; //
: //:c-g T 9*73f&?¥ 1 :
i
,**•-» /
k - /
0--V
? i
3
V \
£
»
7
. i
& \
f \
ft>
K
l&*
_ 1
feiiLO
//.' to
JILL/
I/1. 30
fe
j : i I ; i _] I
fj&. & \ /' £
9'7%® /,3
fl -j, j ^ ^ //^
^. y ^ / 1 /a
5 S'i.7 j /« 7- 3- # 3- « ' //^
?>75".-/
///
/f> '•? ^> | /rj *--
C//i/"^" . ,75 . ,
i ^.-» f *•?
}f ' ^
j! °> &
//.• rv
iT^'QtJ
nl.&$
/$£g
' i ~>*
i , <^
J.'Z-
I-.3
/'3
0*^ i 75"!
f 3 i 75"!
$3 7.5" 1
^// !
tf c/
-^
4//, ! i/m$
'«-5 » » i ' — • ,^ ' i ' "
*^«'*^ 5^" * 7/2^ ^^ I 7'^" ' Vi/U ' /Oa $
31^ ' «? A ///
«LJ , ^'^ n ,_/// ^ ,_
•"x " I A , -^
&<£T 1 "/5^ 1 /^JL & c
a.d is./? 1 //^ ia:ri77
_^JL1 c^/ tV/2, \%£ \77 ,
•2 f o o 1 •/}•>
^' a 0- I* //2"
3. g
t-. /
&/
*•
30
• 6
in-
HI*
tl.t I j jj ^
£/. /
In-
f-L *?-5
6> ^ 77
111
o'.4
f>7
e>7
7*r
7^
"22
7f
^P *> i i' i "^
f 'fr'j *V "S
^7
(/]
hf
h1!
b$
/->.^
/*? -^
/ ci.'^
/2 . ^
i">
/ &*
_£3.3"
75. S"
-------
U' /-»'
DX .. .lAL '-..iNEL-fc, 1 „ =
Gai nesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD TATA SI-IEET
.-r f)
Mat'l Processing Rat
op 1 ing
'.-a- ., lin
Locati on
~ *" - --
. Ri'n No .
T i:;ie/?o; ntJ^^a^Vt /7£&a_
j Moisture in Si.lica (jcl ^_ __ , f t O
Silica Gel Container No. w^Z._]'i itei
Or?at: C07
,1VS
:r.ls Dia. j.4/_in., Probe Length
.,:k Di;
it i
\>j^icr-: I::s;ce Disaster ;T.'. .S iri '_
In.siae Area_i,V", _j^//_-"t2
Height ""^"i:;^"""" ft
nx,-ess
Air
Test Conducted by:
.*i8.G fl£2. __
1 " -~.. I"1 r "
r' • j ~4 ' AT".; ;-»
Point No,
.
,',
r
f ro;n Er?.d
of Port
(in,)
'
,
"" ~ i>
_... — ^
Time
Uj_5^
111 c £r
1 '* 5 ''
I "i-'1- 7,'j
L2±~£
i T ."5 '-^ \ *< — j~ o T"
"Reading
f-,i
g"7?.-¥
X'l'l'S'
:-tc U&
c; / 7 , £
•:,....!,
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/,- 2-D
/, Z
3.30
'- —
Stacx oas
£&
i 17
*"; 7
1) 7
ru ...,,, . /•'
S 7
o ^
Gas J
Teirfp
Gas ?
In
7-
-/u
7^
<^?_-
5 ample
. J Dry
Dieter
^J
Out
7 /
7/
77-
73
7$
"*,'^JT"!"]("'r 1 f^
Box
Tenrp ,
(°F)
*.-, -^,
*"*'"'*
— .
-«*-~
...
Last
Liipiiyer
Test
(CF)
7^
$9-
%'2_
rY 3
o'3
&
-------
•Pcrv c-ruj Distance j Clock
iTrc-vcr^e ; frcm End j Time
Feint Xo. : cf Port !
i ! (in)
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack Meter
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Stack Gas
Orifice i Temp.
Gas Sample', Sample j Last
Press.Diff, \ f°F) \ Gr.s Meter !
C"H2C) j
"Gale, j Actual)
Box ' Iiripinger
l"P) S C'F) I (CF)
—r~7cn:—i <
In I Out !
v'acuum !
en I
Sample i
i x i
|irain !
i i
<^y t? /
/*"?•• •? ^ v * ^
_ 0
T -?/
L
.-«,_.
i_
._1?1_-
p >*)
*^
'" ""c"- v^r "j .^"> **C* !
i ^ / ' c^t •• d t O ;
/
51
.U>SL '
Ai
»/'£>
V /
T"
-J
//
&
•
-------
Plant £^.?ff£A;_ Cti £&, /?;t> S t/ ^//>T- £ _4/j:•
S ml ing location CLS.i^f
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE S/-MPLING FJELD DATA SHEET
Mat'l Processing Rate
• /_;f._kun AC,
O -J Time Eric
Sa~p 1 i ng Tjr,e/Pointj^yrr^^£? /^
Final Gas Meter Reading . , __
Initial Gas Meter Reading f __^_'/.t/. ^^LJlL/1-"
Total Ccncensate in Irnpingpr
1..c i:
—..—
-•/ /;
Moisture in Silica Ccl < •/• / <=.-
?~ » "'*••» ' .^^
Or.sat: C02__
02
CO
j / '•* •
•-t' ' 'i ' • * > /-•- • • ,'t £ . '/^ *,•••• T^/"< ir "V*.^. £ rj>
*.-- . ,.- j •, j, "^ A ; i..,- -, ^ "- * *^ ^ ; 4 .O>>,\ AO . 5- -
r»!eter il:k- /46^^_Pitot Corr. factor $f* S7sj5
Nozzle Dia. |/f£jn, ? Probe Length & ft
tfS»*'^
^-
Inside Area___Jj, >, ^/_/ i't^
Height ~__^l f) *> ' ft
x**» «. #/ , \
3T^''(y }
J
Test Conducted by:
Remarks:
r:-t and
Traverse
Point No,
, , > )
-./;',"**'
• %.vi'^
i
L
*
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
-
^ 2-
r
CJork
Tirae
-
/ ! /O
VI2.6
Uf(/^
lfl£b
6'^.,'j
Gas Met or
Reading
/^iSdl
O7^/^S
^ ""-^ '
t !? •- J • » '. '— '•
.» ; ... — . J
0 57.3
O -^9, 2--
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
Az o
/. zo
/ -7 *
1 ," 0" ""
j j' ~0
L/.'2-o
/, 7_r>
__, .
Me
Ori
Pres
talc.
"J" "
V«/o
L././3
cf. f j
ter i
V,
fice
s. Diff,
H20)
Actual
L/t /^
J^L/o
¥. /o
fdc
C£J/S
Stack Gas
• Temp,
TO
tH
r1
^ C|
<7r;
V*v
V';)
Gas -
Temp
Gas I
(°3
In
x» ^
£V*>
-7 c?
7-?
76
.S Dry
Dieter
p) ,
Out
20
£0
79
~ir.
7V
7^
T
oi^710 1C
Box
Temp .
^~.
_~
^~~~
—
i
Hist
linpirger
Test
^2-
r?
5 '2-
7CJ
77
VacuusJ
on
Sample
Train.
C'Hg)
tie
1 tyQ
//I ft
j&&
/^
i
-------
Port -rd
.•fravorse
Point No,
;*• ]
Distance { Clock
frciTi End j Ti:ne
o£ Port |
fin)
i
\
Gas Meter i
Reading
(ft3)
,
.C5/r ;5";/f> ! C- £7* a
!,i»V2-0
•
C> ^'Zv^
10 (/c *?
Stack
Velocity
Head
(!'H20)
/, 10
I.-20
/, 3. &
•t. •? P /' •'"^ a fa ,.$*''* I *"*=' ^^"
1 J5** ' /"** >*x /f c i ^ **^1* $ fi \ (• *""?
r^.^D
•
}ih,.&h, ~)i%o
.
!'
I
i |
"
i
i S
f
Meter j
Orifice j
Press, Diff, |
("H?cn
1
Calc. i Actual
Stack Gas
Temp ,
C°F)
y» /;•* ~Y'' / ^! V^
^ /a | V-- /O\ -/ /
^^ //^! I/ /(5 i ^ f
ty'f •V')' i' ' v^i
) /
Gas SoJitplej
Gas Meter ]
In
out j
;
Sample ' Last
Box j Irpinger!
TCITID. 1 Temp,
C°F) » C°F)
1
Vacuum ;
on 1
Sample
Train
?-<• ~ ' 'v-; — - 1 --, ^ $f?s:^\
tj. i ) ( / :,_J ! /'&•:}* ''^- i
f .• / :
7^1 - 7f?
7:r ^
/"* *
/ •-> •
-?/ C^>" - 79 ! — " ; 75" i /'?• G" :
y^y # c? '
«i / ]
i ;
C /J j -=-=> | "7 y. . /-^ ^ ^ !
| !
\ \
\ ;. <
i
,
i
t
(
i
' j
! | !
!
!
|
-------
EA. ^NML^L E^.-EK^, IK,,,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAILING FIELD DATA SHEET
p i <
ling Location
!;05y Po/hTj rlfi.^
_-/l'^I14€-21_ST^:c/<__ [
Start
me
' ir' ''' -
C
"Ho-
?c:K Press
y
;
' '-»
\"c;,:.le Dia,
n
_»•';/c:; _~"
-.eier Jox No,
)„ Corr. Factor ___
, Probe Length
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading __ T? SVJ " ^ ^ L
Initial Gas Meter Reading / J/~O f t, (-:~-^
— /._- . .—- __:
Total Condons ate ±r, nnpunoers ___ ^" • ;
Moisture in Silica del2. ^) -22^. ^-"
_
Silica Gel Container N"o.j£/?-i2_Filtor No 2
Crsat: C02 ______ __
02 _____
CO
• u"3
Air
c?_ ft
-2,0
Test Conducted by
ii.side Are
He i ht
_
£,fiZ^ 'll -J
Remarks:
•• •-' r i- f
! O,^-T
, 2oa_i
^ 12 - ^-
StacK
Velocity
Head
f"H20)
It3c
!a
rz?-o j
Jt?~0 H
'/ 7 ''•}
/ t -^- ^
/ -> .
/ . x O
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff,
C"H20)
Gale, | Actual
i!A^Mf;,5'^
LrS\ tf.So
^l-Jn
a/,-,
?,/tf
1 •' '>
i * > •
1
^10
Stack Gas
Temp ,
(°FJ
1 73
LJ7r
^ % y-
^ * &.
»'.- -^J
fc 1A/^J ^
y./o
n?^/o
i •••
, , . .
•g3
Gas Sa-iipie
Terap.S Dry-
Gas Meter
(CF)
in
.
Out
£7
ft-
*o v*
•p** _
/£)
Sample
Box
Temp .
(°Fj
.
^^•»»
^~-
7« f - '
7
-------
Pent and
Traverse
r, .•. '. $
'•> - '-'' I
/' - >,-&,
"
Distance
trcm End
of Port
' in
:
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
'^"'C^ i l\ ' I C) ^7' *"^ ^ 1
J * ? •> ,A,
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
J.IG
/i 2~@
: s/!3>o! 3^/-%t I \ A £-4
' 1 ffu^y fs_£f\o /•>>,&
/|:5o! 2^712. c) i / ?-^>
}<| \1\6Q\2i33~/'Jl \ 'L.3-Q
! * i
< / <
/'>'"; ,^i '•?/
* — \
3.
' /
•5
? •
is «5 7-^ ! ~"~ 1 // / :
Vacuu-Ti J
on I
Sample
Train
4^r
r1 ^ ! g"/- /X^ i^-^.o'
V:'/^ i Ll ! :f?'<' .' "7 / ^
t? /- • /?;•;> .] ^ v.r J.^-.AL*
1
_ZZj
_^^,
£j "-^^ ' ^ *'' -^ ^-^
!
t
, i
1 i
i
! '
1
i
< • 4
J 1
1
i
-------
I;K.-JN4L _1 E^JrEFLJ, LY.,'
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD D^TA SHEET
Time F.nd/J
,G;is De:*ityFaclo
Mat'l Processing Rate
Flnnl Gas Meter Reading __
Irutial Gas Meter Read ing
Total Condeusste in tnp infers
Moisture in Silica Gel __ j£)
S.li.:ca i.;.,-i Cc^ic-'.r^r ;\v>.6/-?
f 1
g:n
Or sat: CO
02
CO
2-
.:i.e-- Jinx AO.
'***3 i 1
Dinoiisicns: Inside Dia:iieter_ _ ^3 /_ __ in |
U'?ic2 Arc1 " "" ft 2
-
hxcess
Air
Test Conducted by:
Co&•&
Remarks :
i-Ti't and | Distance
T.-avcrse ! frerr. End
': .. -.n"; No, ! of Port
(in.J
1 J ^
j ~™ .
•- & I -/jL _
o I •%?,
V 1 '32
1 f^ ; X "->
/- , * v^
/•
! -" /•*.>.-*
*"*"/ < ("-7 »-
/ j ,/J
Clock
rp •
Tune
/rf^e-
{.''ir «J
.
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft-ij
Stack
Velocity
Head
(MH20)
Meter
Orifice
Press, Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
_
> r _.zr i _
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp ,
(°F)
I
j
Gas Sample
Te:np . @ Dry
Gas Meter
^ (°F)
in
!
Out
•
Sa;r:p] e
Box
Temp ,
C°F)
Last
Jmpirger
Test
(°F)
\racuimi
on
Sample
Train :
C'Hg)
_1 "__ X_"i
-------
.Traverse j frcri! End
•Point No, I cf Port. j
(in) |
;Port rud I Distance | Clock j Gas Meter j Stack Meter | Stack Gas j Gas Sample! Sample j Last j Vacuum
Orifice i Term, i Temp.3Dry j jiox ! iKipingeri on
Reading
(ft3)
Velocity
Press,Diff, I
/•( ir r r\ ^ !
i
i
i
-
;
I
|
! _
L
-------
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SrEET
Iii. Location
..
Xo.
A/*- •
•:••:- ^ - - r ':•'•.£0 ,Cus D2r,<*yFa:
"
Mat'l ''recessing Pitc
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Keading_/jJ^1_ J-2
Total Condons ate in In:niJv,rrs_-^''_' __ _
Moisture in S'uica Go'-. _ -^__ __
Silica. Gel CoiUrnncr No.^-^?.^J:iIter
Orscrt: CO, ____ __ _____________ i
07
,g--
' I" /• /O ''" :.° t
3 Di ;,,'*•£ in.., Probe Langui
iieater Sett in.'; "3./) /&
ft
Test Coiiductcd by:
2^-8 3 St.,
Remarks:
•''•rt ??JL;
T -iv :/se
i" O j.n. u AC »
««.««
3
>,'
T
,5'
i
fe^
1 f
... ..... ___
'/.stance
r-rn", '-'j ,'
.i. i ^ . t „'„.. .^
of Port
-% N. •
:-^^^
5t"
Clock
Time
/ * * f
^ '- f A \ fa
%t^ v,* ^^-/- 4 ^
* / 3 "~~h
,2.^- 4^
Gas Mstcr
ilaading
(ft 3)
>*i- ,
S3.2 /t/1^ /V*A.a,
. ~7 ' I T"
» r — ' N f
•^ )
, 7-3 X
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
/./& "]
<0.3?
O* 3o
I cX 10
i_0_^- :L-
o» 'i-5
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp ,
re
I
Gas Sample
Temp , !§ Dry-
Gas Meter
re
In
Out
|
i !
I L .
Sample
Box
Temp .
(°F)
Last i
Irnpirger
Test
(°F)
t
Vac'-r-d
on i
Sample
Train
C'Hg)
!
[_
V--'"
-------
r.-rt and
Traverse
Point No-
<
Distance S Clock
f rc.7i Irid | Time i
of^Pcr- j ^j
Gas Meter
Reading
5; 1 if'' ^i5i'-v>V"'v"'/.f?. ,?Z5L_
V ! /'. S/ !<-.'/$ :/«^2;> v'
/b : /*&f i'f -°^6 i/^.o
,•, _ . _ •*-•* •____ 4 ^^
/.•• ,..-•-',
"3 /
s <. > / *
•^ i 2«^& • I/ 7 -^.o i ^;;7 ! 7r'P ^ 7 !
„ ^/ "// * •-•^ '^-/ ^*v> ^ *"" : ! . J _ 5 _ ..
" ------- ,-- ->- --^ '
!
j
._..
i
i
6/5 ;
-------
E!\.. ..T)XML..._lL R.._JteEF....4 !!.„,'
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DMA SHEET
D- - T"3 ' / ' Stack Press^?^^''Hg
^ "^^ ~ ~ ~ '"
• .-••• r -'zc-*'
''•'">•••,. £TO r •71' ' , V./S ^~.
Su.:'p]e Bex Xo. _~Z- Meter Box No. ^
M'.-t'i- /H5/^Pi.tot Corr. Factor o. ^3
.::::',. _.'••) a. )^* in., /'robe Length -^ ft
"Jrcue H^?.t,.r Setting
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter ^ 5/ ^n
Inside Area " "ft 2
Height • ft
Port and j Distance Clock
Traverse from End Time
Poi:.t i\c. of Port
(in.)
i
/ -^f
'/ '< i -^
_. _ ' *' -^ I
3 / "' 2.
4 '32
<' "-#5
: C-> 0,< j
[ ;• ___ . 73 , ,
Mat'l Processing Rate
Gas Meter
Reading
5/ff '
' Stack
Velocity
C'HzO)
i
Final Gas iM
Initial Gas
Dter Reading 2.3 /-
N'c ter Kca din .^_/ ^7 ^
5"^^"
ft-
. 3o / ft3
Total Condensate in Iwpincers ^tto^— "n-
Moisture in
/• ,--
Silica Gel « * w5 gm
Si.lico. Gel Container No/^^-V
Or? at: C02
02 .
CO
*\ 5
j- "^ -"~ 1^*2 5
Air
/liter N*
j.7Z-^c
Test Conducted by: (r-. /-?// Cf^
Remarks :
Meter Stack Gas
Orifice Temp .
Press. Diff. (°F)
C"H20)
Calc. Actual
i
.^aLo^.^^£f^^
Gas Se-unple i Sample
Temp. 3 Dry Box
Gas Meter Temp,
In ~\ Out
i
Last
Impirger
Test
~ I" !
1 J ! .. 1 .. I. .
Vacuu^l
on
Sample
Train
C'Hg)
-------
.":.:t r-n-J.
,7
^
/
14
, <'
,
frcm End '
of Per:
fin"!
Clock i Gas Meter
Time j Res.aj.ng
i
Stack
Velocity
Head 1
("H20)
Meter j
Orifice \
Press. Diff, j
C'HzO) (
i
Gale, j Actual)
Stack Gas
Temp,
(°F) ;
i
Gas Sample!
Temp ,3 Dry !
Gas Meter j
In | Out |
Sar.rple J Last {Vacuum j
Box : Impinger on \
Temp. '; Tonro, S Sairole i
-r) j (!^F) j Train ;
i i i
— ; . ' ' ' i , r : \ t .
<•' •' \ { > fi ? •* / • ' • ' • • ! i
" • " ,, ,. ~" "1 " "" - - -( - - ^ ^ j --^ ; „, I '( ' __ ,_^ --, _^ .
__/' ^ ...„
, _ ..^ i/c?"s-? /*i *2 ^*
/O , / v> ' / / *-s' -~* Ls ' <£~ *-J
/<3.32- -2-0/1 / lO. ^5"
oJ>&\o.&c'^ :<^-^^ ^ G
'J.' £& ' ?>\ i •">.. '• •?;./ (*, . *S /O s 2_5"
?. , f'.f
7/.2-i/^_
'; '.V-*?
I
2-31.S3? ! ^.3-5*
X /
r - *~ • • • -
f 1
tf X/, i //£>
£>. && Q,&&
I/O
P.^-^ '- /?,65 i y*?.? \
. , , „ . . .__.._._ .
i vx i
f^.t if> V - ££4*'***
1 | LVirA^^^
i '
i
!
^
^-fbrf-'^
i
j
\ — \
\
•--• • •" - ••
1
fa c.^
i
\ i
i
; 1
1
i 1
•
i
ft i H?.o
\
\
/^^— '\C^p<'
>.
c \
^7 ^ I
^73 SJ, 0 |
' -7 ' / i <^ F' i
/ V O, v- j
., .^.., ,
s " i / /?; i ;
i ! / e^y, ! t
' i i ! n !
i i 1
! 1 i
!
t
1 ! !
1 :
! ! I 1
i i !
i
! i
;
1
i
1
|
-------
GRAB SAMPLE COLLECTION
-------
-------
l^u^s-r^
-------
f*—*•———-*-rf"—-*-•—•—• '••-' '"—•—«—-'-*————.—-^
GT & f .3
-------
DR ^,, *
\. .. ,. ,1 V >c 5
U «-o U '4 ^ <=r;
/ ^
4?%Z^£g?.?f'2-&f-£- -
\
O/T
-------
f; * c n
V f '•} v'~ •
.--I
, o 4
.
(\ ff
n (9 5 ',. J. i u 0 ,
.-
I'kr
=»r'
2_
nf K>.
hi equ
7
./S" z,/7
IK-""
^^-^
=^=,
-------
'&£&&
, '(•'.... ^-~7--7,-7 ^> /
c^ c^> e^i*
T
f
i/i nft"\
I! * »-j - c
=--"--=— r^—3"!^""
? * PC
2-
f^1 /r^. ^
f^, W5
' p?
»
'''ky,£4^L
i/
92-
z, c
-------
-------
&
D
r>t ,
v__.A. .ti--i
?rx-
pau /s?
"I'fft&e. Mc'u?j's
-------
- t'-.
-------
t3> fa />' AP
veeTA^twire ,?
.2-S 2, 05"
^Ci^-i=CS>
-------
,,/ £,-
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
Standard Analytical Procedures
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to
At In of: n ,
J Date 12-21-72
Subject: summary of Fluoride Analysis
T"
' R.° Neulicht, EMS, IRL
This memorandum is in response to your request for a brief
summary of our SPADNS-Zirconium Lake procedure for determination
of fluoride in stack emission samples.
Samples received in our laboratory are filtered through
fluoride free paper filters to yield water soluble and water insoluble
portions. The water insoluble particulate collected on the filter-
is rinsed throughly to be sure that all water soluble fluoride is
rinsed through. The water soluble fraction is distilled from sul-
furic acid to a maximum temperature of 180 C. If chloride is suspected
in the sample Ag_So is added to the still. SPADMS solution is added
to an 'aliquot of the distillate and the absorbance is read at 570 n:n.
The concentration of the sample is determined from a calibration curve
prepared rror, standard fluoride solutions. It is very important that
the temperature of the samples be the same as that of the standards
when absorbances arc recorded.
The water insoluble fraction of the sample is evaporated to dry-
ness in the. presence of a slurry 01: Uauf and c.hun lusuu. wiLli Icr.CU. TliC.
fusate is dissolved with distilled water, neutralized with dilute H So .,
distilled and analyzed as described for the soluble portion.
Paper filters containing particulate are cut into small pieces,
suspended in a slurry of CAO, evaporated to.dryness and ashed prior
to the .alkali fusion and distillation.
If you have any questions about this procedure, let me know.
Howard L. Crist
Chief, Source Sample Analysis Section
cc: R. E. Lee
-------
Phosphorous Pentoxide Determination
,- r
Colorimetric Molybdovanadophosphate Method
An aliquot of sample is hydrolyzed in the presence of HC1 and
' HNO acids by boiling almost, to dryness. .
V ,
The sample is cooled to room temperature, transferred to a
250 ml volumetric flask and diluted to volume with distilled water.
A 20 ml aliquot is transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask, 20 ml
of molybdovanadate reagent is 'added and the flask is diluted to
volume.
The absorbance of the yellow color is determined after ten min-
utes at 400 nm. The concentration of phosphorous pentoxide is de-
termined from a calibration curve prepared with standard solutions.
f
-------
APPENDIX D
Laboratory Results
-------
Samole STPm
Type
Teim
Density
PH
Soluble F
Insoluble F
522 PGr
K01 "
523
\
524 "
525 "
526 "
527 "
528 l\
529 %;
530 "
531 "
^
532 "
£
/?
Outlet Reactor
Scrubber. H 0
2
Outlet Cooler
Scrubber HO
Scrubber HO
Outlet-Dryer
Scrubber HO
Inlet
Moisture
Moi sture
Moisture
76°F
1.014
1.Q17
1.014
No Sample
1.80
1.70
1.80
533
y
Stack
5.0 g/L
5.3 g/L
6.3 g/L
6.2 g/L
7.0 mg/sample
4.2 g/sample
54 p.g/sample
0.18 mg/sample
0.27 mg/sample
68 tig/sample
29.2 mg/sample
6.72 mg/samplf
29 V>g/sample
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Research Triangle Park/ North Carolina 27711
Reply to ' . '
Dalt: 3/28/72
Subject: Fluoride Analysis Border* Chemical Compamy
• 7-o; Mr. Jerome J. Rom '
Emission Testing Branch . . .. •
Division of Applied Technology • ' '. .
Thru: Mr. Howard Crist,, Chief,
. . Source Sample Analysis Section
Attached is the Fluoride Data for the Borden Chemical
Company, . The water soluble fluoride was done by sulfuric
acid distillation followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM Lake
Method.
The insoluble fluorides and products were fused
with NaOH followed by sulfuric acid distillation then by
the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM Lake Method.
Allen E.
Source Sample Analysis Section
cJSFAB, DAS - - . .
Attachment
ccs R. Lampe
• • J. Me Ginnity
J. Reynolds
.D. von Lehmden
H. Crist
-------
Type
Temp.
Density
PH
Soluble F
Insoluble F
I-
ri
ft
U
Dryer Inlet
Reactor Outlet
Dryer Scrubber Outlet
Dryer Reactor
Reactor Scrubber Outlet
Cooler Outlet
Scrubber H^.0 Outlet
Reactor
Scrubber HO -
Outlet Cooler
" Outlet
76°F
76°F
76°F
n
Dryer
Inlet
Stack
Dryer Outlet
Reactor "
Dryer Scrubber Outlet
Dryer - Reactor
Reactor Scrubber Outlet
Cooler Outlet
76 °F
1.014
1.016
1.018
1.015
1.80
1.65
1.65
1.80
200 ing/sample
97 mg/sample
37 ing/sample
131 g/sample
3.7 mg/sample
72 mg/sample
6.2 g/L
5.9 g/L
5.3 g/L
4.1 g/L
11.4 mg/sample
62 mg/sample
73 mg/sample
21.4 mg/sample
145 g/sample
2.6 mg/sample
58 mg/sample
0.12 mg/sample
0.13 mg/sampl«
40 ^g/sample
47 Jig/sample
0.14 mg/sampl<
24 p.g/ sample
50 [Jig/ sample
0.16 mg/sampl
31 M-g/ sample
/ilO
26 p.g/sample
-------
Samol e
551 PG'
552 "
553 "
554 " •
555 "
556 "
557 "
558 "M
559 "^
560 "
561 "
562 "
563 "
564 "
565 "
566 "
567 "
>
S/WrioM Tvn^ Temn_ Dp>ns-5-f-\r PH
\M
x\ HO Blank
N
^ Whatman # 1
Filter Blank
22 Scrubber HO Outlet 76 F 1.015 1.80
Reactor
/^ Scrubber HO Outlet 76°F 1.017 1.70
Cooler
£> Scrubber HO Outlet 76°F 1.017 1.70
. Dryer
ft Scrubber HO Inlet 76°F 1.015 1.80
\J Stack
\f( Dryer Outlet
y Reactor Outlet
L- . Dryer Scrubber Outlet
• \v Dryer Reactor
Cj Reactor Scrubber Outlet
|s/\ Cooler Outlet
HO Blank
Whatman # 1 Filter Blank
40 % Acid
\ ' ' •
^ 22 % Acid
K^
So1p"hlf= F
25 p.g/240ml
4.8 g/L
5.4 g/L
4.7 g/L
4.8 g/L
20.6 mg/sample
125 mg/sample '
47 mg/sample
20 mg/sample
188 g/ sample
2.5 mg/sample
70 mg/sample
30 Hg/245 ml
9.3 g/L
23.9 g/L
Inj=jn..I.uble_.P-
sample
29 p»g/ sample
32 ng/sample
^ 10 p.g/sample
35 Jig/ sample
23 mj/sample
y>g/sample
-------
Sample
A
568 PG
572 "
574 "
575 "
576 "
580 "
i
V
582 "
583 "
584 "
588 "
-r
Type
GTSP Product
54 % Acid
40 % Acid
22 % Acid
GTSP Product
54 % Acid.
40 % Acid
22 % Acid
GTSP Product
54 % Acid
Temp.
Density PH
Soluble F
26.9 mg/g
9.2 g/L
10.2 g/L
21.1 g/L
22.9 mg/g
7.4 g/L
9.1 g/L
23.9 g/L
21.8 mg/g
6.8 g/L
Insoluble F
-------
A
B
Results
;Q
' "
< '0
' "
E. 8 "
£.'9 "
581 "
s
GO.
P
R-G venturi Outlet
22 % Acid 2
Inlet to venturi
22% acid 2
Dryer venturi outlet
22% Acid: 2
Cooler venturi
Outlet 22% Acid 2
R-G venturi outlet
22% Acid 5
Inlet to venturi
22% acid 5
Dryer venturi Outlet
22% Acid 5
Cooler venturi Outlet
22% Acid 5
76
76
76
75
75
76
76
76
134
118
120
116
118
114
116
110
25.0 g/L
25.0 g/L
26.8 g/L
27.0 "
27.3 "
27.1 "
28.2 "
28.0 "
-------
PG
I
ro
3~7 "^
X
fT~.9 "
_2-
Venturi Systems,
A B C Results
R-G Venturi Outlet
22% Acid 5 76 112 25.5 g/L
Inlet to venturi
22% Acid 8 76 112 26.2 "
Dryer venturi
Outlet 22% Acid 8 76 109 27.0 "
Cooler Venturi ' •
Outlet 22% Acid 8 76 118 25.7 "
I. = % Solids
r— O
E = Room Temperature F
Q_= Heat was applied to the sample until all solids were finely mixed and
that temperature was recorded. F
The three Dryer Reactor Samples needed to be filtered again. The dirt
CjJ each sample was placed in 1400 ml of water and was stirred for about
tgn minutes, then it was filtered. This was done three different times
1 >r each sample. The filtrate was added together and analyzed for
tj.uor.ides. The Insoluble Fluoride was run on the dirt the usxaal way
ajfter it was filtered.
Soluble F Insoluble F
537 95 mg/sample 120 mg/sample
548 234 mg/sample 159 mg/sample
561 2.4 g/sample . 223 mg/sample
-------
APPENDIX E
Project Participants
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Name
John Dollar
John Chadbourne
Leon Duncan
A. L. Wilson
Albert Henderson
Harvey Gray
Dennis Falgout
Ray Black
Tommy Tucker
George Allen
Robert Durgan
Larry Wurts
Jerry Smith
John Cutts
Eric Johnson
Tony Arroyo
Jerome Rom
John Reynolds
Roy Neulicht
Title
Project Manager
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Environmental Specialist
Computer Analyst
EPA, Project Officer
EPA, Project Engineer
EPA, Chemical Engineer
------- |