72 - CI - 5B
BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC.
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE STORAGE
PINEY POINT
JANUARY 24, 1972
enrironmvntal
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
72 - CI - 5B
BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC.
GRANULAR TRIPLE SUPERPHOSPHATE STORAGE ji
.PINEY POINT .'• [I
JANUARY 24, 1972 !
Test Conducted by:
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
Contract # CPA 70 - 82
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
List of Figures ii
List of Tables iii
Introduction 1
Summary of Results .1
Process Description 5
Process Operation 5
Location of Sampling Points 6
Sampling and Analytical Procedures 9
Appendix 13
A. Emission Calculations and Results
B. Field Data
C. Standard Analytical Procedures
D. Laboratory Results
E. Project Participants
1i
-------
\
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
1. Schematic Flow Diagram 2
2. Sample Port Location - Scrubber Outlet 7
3. Sample Port Location - Scrubber Inlet 8
4. Fluoride Sampling Train 10
LIST OF TABLES
1. Summary of Results - Scrubber Outlet 3
2. Summary of Results - Scrubber Inlet 4
iii
-------
INTRODUCTION
Under the direction of the Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
mental Engineering, Inc. conducted emission tests at the Borden Chemical,
Inc. phosphate works 1n P1ney Point, Florida. On January 24, 1972, three
test runs of approximately eighty minutes each were conducted on Borden's
granular triple superphosphate storage building. The purpose of the tests
was to obtain emission data for the use of both the Industrial Studies
Branch and the Performance Standards Branch of the EPA.
Measurements for total fluorides were made at the inlet and outlet
ducts of the storage off-gas scrubber. Grab samples of the scrubbing liquid
were taken during the test runs and analyzed for fluoride content. A schema-
tic flow diagram of the process operation and the sampling locations is given
in Figure 1. Complete test results are given in Appendix A.
%
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The amount of granular triple superphosphate located in storage during
the test runs was approximately 1400 tons P2°5' Loading of the product into
rail cars was taking place during the test runs.
No major problems were encountered during the sampling; the only irregu-
larity occurred at the scrubber outlet. At the first three traverse points of
the duct the gas flow was negative. For this reason, although the true duct
2 2
area was 26.3 FT , the effective stack area was calculated to be only 23 FT .
The value for the effective stack area was used In all calculations.
\
A complete summary of the stack conditions and fluoride concentrations for
each test point 1s given 1n Tables 1 and 2.
-------
GTSP Product
Storage
-Q-
Pond Water
I
Tail Gas
Scrubber
T
To Pond
To
Atmosphere
Stack
FIGURE 1
GTSP STORAGE
BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC.
-------
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
"Scrubber Outlet •-
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
5."ack pressure, inches Hg
Stack gas moisture, % volume
A- erage stack gas temperature, °F.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas G> S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
i
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total , gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Product in Storage, Tons P2®5
Fluoride, water soluble, (lb/hr)/ton
P?05 stored
Fluoride, total (lb/hr)/ton PoOc
stored. c °
Scrubber efficiency, %
1
1-24-72
30
30
2.3 '
75
64844
81.9
5.6
5.61
0.0011
0.0011
0.001
0.001
0.61
.0.61
1430
0;0004
0.0004
71.6
2
1-24-72
30
30
2.3
75
64401
79.439
4.1 ,
4.133
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.0008
0.44
0.44
1430
\
0.0003
0.0003
54.2
3
1-24-72
30
30
2.2
75
65744
82.663
4.6
4.687
0.0009
0.0009
0.0008
'0.0008
0.51
0.51
1430
0.0003
0.0003
71.5
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
FLUORIDES
'•• : SCRUBBER INLET
Run No.
Date
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches He.
Stack gas moisture, % volume
Average stack gas temper? iMre, 'T.
Stack gas flow rate @ S.T.P., SCFM
Vol. dry gas @ S.T.P. , SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, mg
Fluoride, total , mg
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/SCF
Fluoride, total, gr/SCF
Fluoride, water soluble, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, total, gr/CF stk. cond.
Fluoride, water soluble, Ib/hour
Fluoride, total, Ib/hour
Product in Storage, Tons P205
Fluoride, water soluble, (lb/hr.)/ton
P^05 stored ' - . .
Ftuoride, total, (lb/hr)/ton
PoOi- stored
*• j
Scrubber efficiency, %
I
1-24-72
30
29.75
0.5
85
83457
84.432
16.3
16.59
0.003
0.003
0.0029
0.0029
2,. 15
2. 15
1430
0.0015
0.0015
-
2
1-24-72
30
29.75
0.4
85
. 79621
91.941
8.3 ,
8.44
Q.0014
0.0014
0.0013
0.0014
0,96
0,96
1430
0.0007
0.0007
-
3
1-24-72
30
29.75
0.9
84
74427
84.934
15.3
15.372
0.0028
0.0028
0.0027
0.0027
1..79
1.79
1430
0.0012
0.0012
-
Dry, 70°F., 29.92 inches Hg.
-------
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Bulk granular triple superphosphate is stored 1n a large building.
Emissions generated by the curing, and the handling of the product while
loading on rail cars are vented to a packed scrubber.
PROCESS OPERATION
Operating conditions were normal during all three test runs.
\
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
The sampling sites and number of "traverse points were
selected as per "Method I - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Sta-
tionary Sources, Part 60, Subchapter C, Chapter 1, Title 40," Federal
Register, No. 247-Pt. II-l.
The above method suggests using two perpendicular diameters
of traverse points per sampling station, however, on-site conditions
necessitated the use of only one traverse diameter. The suggested
number of traverse points per diameter was used where possible without
sampling within one inch of the inner wall.
Figures 2 through 3 are schematic diagrams of the stack
configurations near the sampling location, and the sampling points
traversed during the emission tests.
-------
Top View
Side View
Traverse Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 '
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Distance from
Inner Wall (in.)
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
- 45
47
FIGURE 2
LOCATION OF PORT, STATION Q, BORDEN CHEMICALS
SCRUBBER OUTLET
-------
35'
e»
N
, >
•a— 12' — B*
i
* — 12' »•
x° ^
' t- Port
Scrubber
Damper
Diameter = 5.5 ft
Traverse Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Distance from Inner Wall (in.)
2 ,3/16
6 15/16
12 13/16
21 3/8
44 5/8
53 1/4
59 1/8
63 15/16
FIGURE 3
LOCATION OF PORT, STATION P, BORDEN CHEMICALS
SCRUBBER INLET-
8
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Preliminary Moisture Determination
The preliminary moisture contents were determined from wet
and dry bulb thermometry. See Appendix B for the data used in deter-
mining the preliminary moisture content of the stack gases.
The final moisture content was determined as per Method 5
of the Federal Register (Volume 36* Number 297, Paragraph II, December
23, 1971) by totalling the condensate collected in the three impingers
and the silica gel.
B. Preliminary Velocity Determination
Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register was used
as a guide in determining the preliminary stack gas velocity for each
source tested. The major difference was that only the maximum and
minimum velocity heads across each stack area were determined so that
a proper nozzle size could be selected. During each of the three fluoride
emission tests, velocity head readings were taken at points selected
by using Method 1 of the Federal Register.
Stack pressure and temperature measurements were also made
during the preliminary velocity determinations.
C. Sampling for Fluoride Emissions
The sampling procedure used for determining fluoride emissions
was similar to Method 5 of the Federal Register. The major difference
between the two methods wastthe configuration o"f the sampling train. The
sampling train described in the Federal Register has a heated box con-
taining the filter holder directly following the glass probe. The s
-------
100 ml
100 ml
1. Stainless Steel Nozzle
2. Heated Glass Probe
3. Glass Connector
4. Ice Bath
5. Impinger with
6. Impinger with
7. Impinger, Dry
8. Impinger with
9. Filter Holder
10. Thermometer
_n. Flexible Sample Line
o!2. Vacuum Gauge
13. Main Control Valve
14. By-Pass Control Valve
15. Air Tight Vacuum Pump
16. Dry Test Meter
17. Calibrated Orifice
13. Inclined Manometer
19. S-Type Pi tot Tube
H90
H0
19
(Modified Tip)
)
(Standard Tip
(Modified Tip)
180 grams Silica Gel (Modified Tip)
with No. 1 Whatman Filter
17
Figure 4
FLUORIDE SAMPLING' TRAIN .
-------
sampling train used in these tests contained no heated box and the filter
holder was placed between the third and fourth'impingers (between dry
impinger and silica gel impinger).to prevent sample carryover. Figure 4
is a schematic diagram of the sampling train used.
After the selection of the sampling site and the minimum number
of sampling points per Method 2 of the above mentioned Federal Register,
three separate test runs were performed. For each run, the required
stack and sampling parameters were recorded on field data sheets. They
are included in Appendix B>. Readings were taken at each traverse point
at least every five minutes, and when significant changes in stack para-
meters necessitated additional adjustments to maintain an isokinetic flow
rate. Nomographs were used to aid in the rapid adjustment of the sampling
rate. The traverse points were selected to maintain at least one inch
from the inner stack wall.
*
After each run, the liquid volume in the first three impingers
was measured volumetrically and the silica gel was reweighed. The im-
pinger liquid, the filter, plus the water washings of the probe and other
sampling train components up to the silica gel. were placed into a
single polyethylene container.
D. Liquid and Product Grab Samples
Periodically, during each test run, grab samples of the raw
materials, finished product, and scrubber liquid were taken, and the
temperature and pH were determined at the site.
E. Laboratory Analysis
Water soluble fluorides were done by a sulfuric acid distil-
n
-------
lation followed by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIIM LAKE METHOD. Water insoluble
fluorides were first fused with NaOH followed by a sulfuric acid distil-
lation then by the SPADNS-ZIRCONIUM LAKE METHOD.
For more details of exact method used see Appendix C.
\
12
-------
APPENDIX
13
-------
APPENDIX A
Emission Calculations & Results
-------
E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING NOMENCLATURE SHEET
PB - Barometric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
As - Stack area, sq. ft.
AS1- Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. ft.
NPTS - Number of traverse points where the pitot velocity head was greater than zero,
TS - Stack temperature, °R
TM - Meter temperature, °R
E - Average square root of velocity head, Vinches H20
AH - Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches ^0
AN - Sampling nozzle area, square feet
CP - S-type pitot tube correction factor
VM - Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
VC - Condensate and silica gel increase in impringers, milliliters
Po - Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, [PB +A. H~| inches Hg
L 13.6J
STP - Standard conditions, dry, 70°F, 29.92 inches Hg
Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
Moisture fraction of stack gas
Dry gas fraction . .
Molecular weight of stack gas, lbs/lb-mole (dry conditions)
Molecular weight of stack gas, lbs/lb-mole (stack conditions)
Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to air
Excess air, %
Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
Stack gas velocity, feet per minute
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (stack conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute (dry conditions)
Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet-per minute (STP)
Percent isokinetic volume sampled (method described in Federal Register)
Total sample time, minutes
-------
EQUATIONS FOR CALCULATING FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
VWV = (0.0474) x (VC)
VSTPD = (17 . 71 x (VM) x (PB + — B- ) -=- TM
13.6
VT = (VWV) + (VSTPD)
W = (VWV)-j-(VT)
FDA - (1.0) - (W)
FMOIST = Assumed moisture fraction
MD = (0.44 x % CO ) + (0.32 x % 02) + (0.28 x % NZ) + (0.28 x % CO)
MS = (MD x FDA) + (18 x W)
GS = (MS) -h (28. 99)
^
EA = [(100) x (% 02 - SjEO)] ~ [(0.266 x % NZ) - (% 02 - ^^)]
U = (174) x (CP) x (H) x \ftTS x 29.92)-~(GS x PS)
QS = (£) x (AS)
QD = (QS) x (FDA) .
QSTPD = (530) x (QD)-J-(TS)x (PS) r (29.92)
PISO = Qo. oo267 x VC x TS) -f (PQ x TS x VM-5-TM)] -7- [(Time x U x PS x AN)]
Fluoride Emissions:
MG = Milligrams of fluoride from lab analysis
Grains/SCF = (0.01543) x (MG) -f- VSTPD
Grains/CF, Stack Cond. = (17.71) x (PS) x (FDA) x (Grains/SCF) ~ (TS)
Lbs/hour = (Grains/SCF) x (0.00857) x (QSTPD)
= Tons/hour, determined from plant data
Lbs/ton P20 Fed = (Ibs/hour) -~ (Tons/hour -P205 Fed)
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
TEST NO - no OF nuns -
PLANT - BORDEN CHEMI-CAL PINEY POINT, FLA.
SOURCE - F/.ff. SCRUPBER INLET
TYPE OF PLANT - FERTILIZER STORAGE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES
DliUt! NUMBER
2 ) DA TE
3) TIME BEGAN
• *)TIME END
S)BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN JIG
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN HG
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COND, CUBIC FEET
8) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEG F
Q)VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10) TOTAL U20 COLLECTED, ML
11) VOL 1120 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
IS) PERCENT 02
It) PER CENT CO
17) PER CENT 112
18) PER CENT EXCESS AIR
1Q)'MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY
2Q)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CO
2DSTACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN H20
23) AVb'R AGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F
2^)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TL'!!P*VEL HEAD)
2S)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR
2&)STACK PRESSURE, IN HG , ABSOLUT'S
27 )S TACK GAS VEL, STACK COiJD, F.P.I',.
2B)STACK AREA, SQ FEET . .
2 . .5
j TJ7T3TI3 4—0717^11 4 — Cr.-t7TT2-B '
4~'07UU3" i~TT7D'rTrrr i 0~.~mT?T3
JL ~ «-.— ^ L « ^^_^ -J. -~.~~~~~.
i T7.uTJ7TT i u.rrrrrrr i ^r.^nr^r ~
4~tJ7t)tT7(T r~u7n>rrrrr r — rr.~rnr2T —
. i • [ -i _1 ,_*
| '2.1457 i 0.9553 l H.T^^
1 t.T457 1 0.9553 1 1.786'^_
1_-1A3JL^ L. JL43JO-.. L_...1.43.CL
H3)FLUORIDE - WATER SOL . , Ib/hr/ton P205stored 1_.°- P.O.I5. 1_ 0',lQfi9Z 1__O.OQ12 ,
i\H)FLUORIDE - TOTAL, Ib/hr/ton P205 stored "
1 0.0015 1 O.OJ3JDZ 1 0,00_L2_
***5.i7.2J.<">/7/1'y, 70 DEGREES F, 29.92 IHCUES MERCURY***
-------
TEST NO - ' NO OF RUNS -
PLANT - BORDEN CHEMICAL PINEY POINT, FLA.
SOURCE - scrubber Outlet
TYPE OF PLANT - FERTILIZER STORAGE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT -
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - FLUORIDES
I )RUii NUMBER 1 J- 1 ? 1 3 1
2) DATE l-Jj^L/JL2--!
3)TIXE BEGAU 1_J_2J_L°_ 1
*t)TIUE EKD l.J-JjJUL 1
S)BAXO:-!STRIC PRESSURE, 1/7 JIG ' L._30 J.__o
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IH HG i^JlfJJL -1
7) VOL DRY CAS, METER COND, CUBIC FEET 1__8J_«J- 1
B) AVER AGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEG F 1_J._OJL_P i_J_2J.-J 1 121*1 1
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET 1_JU_._3 JLjJX. 4.3.2 1 £2jLHHl 1
10) TOTAL i!20 COLLECTED, ML JL3Jj3 1_^D-J 1 22 1
11) VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU FTi_l_,3£> l—l—DI i__li25. 1
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME 1_JL'_3 J...2-.3 1 2^2 1
13)ASSUi:SD STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL I__?_j3 1-.2-.4. l__2.s.it 1
IDPERCEUT C02 1 ;-- {_-_-- l_.z==. 1
IS)PERCENT 02 L.IL1 I--" !_«=. 1
16)PERCEuT CO . 1_I11 1-"-- !_-_- 1'
17)PERCENT 112 JLlL" l-"~ l--~- ll
1B1PLRCEUT EXCESS AIR 1__? J._0 1 2 11
19)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, DRY L.JrjL.&J? l.^S^SG J. 28_^.§.L 1!
20)MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, STK CO/7DJL.2?.. 6 1.28^6 J. 2n._Rl_ _[|
21)5TACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1_^J^ l_0j.22 i__9.^2.0. I1
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN 1120 1_^J1^ JL 0^.859 J. 2.^11 II
23)AVL'RAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEG F l_.Zlli7 1_V5 1 7.1^2. I1
24)/iV(/' SQUARE ROOT (STK TEUPxVEL HEAD) 1_22^21 1_!9.-.8Z8 1 ^LV.! 1\
2S)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR 1_^8^ 1_0A83 1 2.L.11 i1
26)STACK PRESSURE, III UG , ABSOLUTE . i_^° 1_30 _[ 30_ jj
27)STAJK GAS VEL, STACK COKD, F.P.M. l_2504j,5 l_288n._7 J, ^'1^^ jl
2B)ST
-------
SCRUBBER EFFICIENCY
-------
BORDEN CHEMICAL, INC.
GTSP STORAGE
Pond Water
—©-
Tail Gas
Scrubber
To Pond
RUN
Flow: 83457 (DSCFM)
Fluoride: 2.15 #/hr
Efficiency: 71.6%
Flow: 64844 (DSCFM)
Fluoride: 0.61 (#/hr)
RUN n
79621
0.96
54.2%
64401
0.44
RUN #3
74427
1.79
71.5%
65744
0.51
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE DETERMINATION
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISTURE CHECK
PLANT Borden Chemicals
STACK Scrubber Inlet
R\TE January 24. 1972
- SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp. 115°F, Wet Bulb Temp. 91 °F, Dew Point Temp. 33 °F.
Vapor Pressure of H20 @ DP 0.1878 "Hg. Stack Pressure 29.75 "Hg.
Moisture Fraction 0.0068 , Dry Air Fraction 0.993? "Hg.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled_
Average Meter Temp_
Average Orifice AH
"H20
Barometric Pressure 9 Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP
Volume of Condensate
ml
Water Vapor Volume 3 STP_
Moisture Fraction
Ft
_"Hg
Dry Air Fraction
-------
PRELIMINARY MOISIUIH: CHECK
PLANT Borden Chemicals '
STACK Storage Outlet
DATE January 24, 1972
SAMPLE TIME
METHOD 1
Dry Bulb Temp. 74°F, Wet Bulb Temp. 74 °F, Dew Point Temp. ^°F,
Vapor Pressure of H20 @ DP 0.8462 "Hg. Stack Pressure 30 "Hg.
Moisture Fraction 0.0282 , Dry Air Fraction 0.9718 "Hg.
METHOD 2
Final Dry Test Meter Reading
Initial Dry Test Meter Reading
Dry Test Meter Volume Sampled__
Average Meter Temp_
Average Orifice AH
"H20
Barometric Pressure 3 Orifice Meter
Dry Gas Volume Sampled @ STP
Volume of Condensate
ml
Ft"
Ft'
"Hg
Water Vapor Volume 3 STP_
Moisture Fraction
Ft*
Dry Air Fraction
-------
FLUORIDE EMISSIONS
-------
/»
SOURCE SAMPLING HELD DATA SHEET •*£" I
Plant ~£%Q rq^^t- ' ^ Mat'l Processing Rate
Sampling Location (ji^H ~ Sc*uM>fr-&t<£"
Date 1/2^1 j2~ Run No. /
Time Start /2/"C~ Time End /JV 3_T •
Sampling Time/Point ytX (£?' /'ji? /t>>W
DB $5" °F, WB — °F, VF @ DP "Hg
Moisture/ %,FDA ,Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press3 ^ "Hg, Stack Press^tf^
Weather f-G-t /*"*
Temp. °F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No,
Meter AH@ l'£° Pitot Corr. Factor O.g.,5
Nozzle Dia,O'2/in., Probe Length 8 ft
Probe Heater Setting • ':
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter &£> in
Inside Area ft2
Height ft
Sketch of^S
-^
^M
i
. i
\ 1
tatk
\.jj
NN^*' \^^V
O
—
/7»-
Final Gas Meter Reading (0(0 ~7 . 5" ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading $~7Q * 5 2 7 ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel "3> „
je- 1*^"
J5* ml/
3 gm^
Silica Gel Container No.£o3 Filter No .7.20 f/
Or sat: C00 •
0,
CO
No
Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: •^T"o /{^ 0_Lf,~HsL
/'
~7~~/3 /r> 7^i ^ /rfe r —
Remarks: ^/a^ V&^c/'A
e//j €. T^ tsfoi^nfr in //^ e.
/ / . • /j . /•
' ^/7^/fl//^
/•/ /A -^
3 « ^' 'o /» c ,
3.:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
1&
/
2~
-3
Distance
from End
of Port
' (in)
*
?%
iS/
t SM
>
/z $e>
/3-lf
/a«yo
/^^
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
5^// /f 0
5^^'
5^-3
^5.^
^/2.- t
,5-2.3,?
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
%*
*£
/, 6
/.*
o. 35^
.5.9^
Meter
Orifi
Press
rilTT
1 H2
Calc;
/o,o
/Ao
3-V
3-6
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
*r
^r
s^
* £
*£
**
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
f°F
In
$*
-------
Port land
Traverse
Point No.
I/.
f
•
c>
' - •
• ,
7
$>
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
3/^y
lit fa
53fo
T
*?'/*
&3 %
•
Clock
Time
IZL&QL
jjHSf
11,00
f^,0^
/ 3- IO
&if
/3.2-0
ri.zg
/3>3o
ft-LSf
,
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3) ' .
&27. ?
i*3±, y-
£jJ7,/
/ f i ^^ * "^y"
lf> br* ^^ ft
&47' y
~ - , •
L>b2> if-
£70 •$
k 77.3"
Stack
Velocity
Head x
O<3$
0<3£'
O'Ao
O>/%
O*gO
Q.$o
A 7
/ '7
^ • 3
a. -viz
Meter;
Orifice
Press. Diff.
(MH20)
Cal.
/,Lfo
/<¥&
o*&
0'7¥
5.2-
3.2.
&•&
£»&
'*?.&
9-°
*
Actual
/•¥*
/,lfQ
O (%O
_dj3$-
1
3/2-
3'2-
£.3
£ /2-'
^ '2-
to * Z-—
/?B
/<78
//S
/20
/3-S
I**
/3&
/*&
to
Out
g£
/ &
"/ ^^
ff
9&>
/O 0
1*0
/ & 2—
/ ^ i5
/&£>
1 ^
6
Sampfe
. Box
Tempi
(OF)
/:'. -
t
.;.,. "v .- M -
Last
Impinger
Temp-.-
'*?
7/
' *7 4^
/ V-
&%
67
tt*v5
&£*-
(& &
(o^
Vacuum
. on
Sample-
Train
("Hg) .
^0
_JL£_
fro
if ^ O
Q C~
?» s
ft<°
1 G? ""7
/ & f £—"
/'?< ^
J£* ^
\
-------
_.7iRC.._JfTAL _TGIN_.JNG, «.t,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
V
Plant
son
/v.
Sampling Location UJ> /£
Date
^ 7*7 2-
Run No.
Time Start / 55T
Sampling Time/Point
DB °F, WB '
Moisture^/ I, FDA
Barometric Press 3°
Weather (^,/f»^^
Temp. °F, W/D
2.
Time End /JT.' ff
F, VF 8 DP
'Hg
,Gas Density F act or_
'Hg, Stack PresS'f
,W/S
Meter 'Box No.
Sample Box No, _
Meter AH@/»lg Pitot Corr. Factor O.?3
Nozzle Dia.jg,jL^in. , Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting _
ft
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area .
Height
in
Tt2
" ft
/
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel ~z
ml
gm
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: C07
LJ i •-•—..
02 _____
CO
Filter No.
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:_
Remarks:
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
/
?~
3-
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
*3&
./
<^6
/
/*'2fc
Clock
Time
/#oo-
MO*
141°
/¥/-**
/yzo
/¥zf
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
617S5°
&$<{,<$
<>?1>7
700,~2f
707, f
7/5' 3-
7/7-7
/
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
A7
/'^
7.^"
/*&
O< 9
*1
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
^' £>
6*6
5-'$
X<%
3.S
1
/2r
Out
/^5
/tf^
/Ob
f° 7
/os
/o$
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Lnpirger
Test
(°F)
^4^
^3
^^
^
^7
^7
Vacuuri
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
11 <°
((<*
/o>B
/*.#
8:3
_f ' °
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
4
f
f
£
7
t
X
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
./-
2/y*
W?e
*3f/*/
r
S??g
y
*3'^
Clock
Time
)43o
Mzf
JW°
1WS
/ff'o
M&ZL
/S'rtO
rs'tS'
/&o
Ar/r-
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
722, 5"
7*r.?
?2 £' ^
73;, ^
7.5. %
7£f.-7
ll&'V/O
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
0* 30
&. ?o
o* /7
^?»/7
^'7^
0,7 f
I-75-
f, 7.<^
2< • 7
.2-7
5. f
_^iSL
^•^
Jo.o
/o-o
Actual
y/7-
/* 3-
o • 7
o>7
I-?
&.?
*•?
6,-?
%*Q
8-S*
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
/2o
S3,o
/2LO
/ft
1
/ZS
/<27
/3-y-
/3&
/t*
13$
Out
/fc#
/^?
//o
//"
///
// /
//z-
//^
//r
//y
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)'
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
^7
*??-
7^
7 5-
7S-
&?
kf
£5-
&S~
&&
Vacuum
.on
Sample
Train
£,Q
r^&^l
6> 2-
t> 7
//- o
It' &
•3.0 •&
/2i5-
/7'3"
/7-sr
-------
Y
Plant
cL
I . JfcQN _. -lAL _ .'JNEL. „ t,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location Id, H , Sc ru^fier* 3* /<•/
Date /-l^t- -7 ^ Run No. $
Time Start /C'rCT Time End /"/V/C?
Sampling Time/Point /O y^r^( /?o, ToT*-l
DB °F, WB °F, VF @ DP ' "Hg^
Moisture I* I, FDA , Gas Density Fact or
Barometric Press^6"Hg, Stack Press2If,Zjr"Hg
Weather
Temp. °F, W/D ,W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No.
Meter AH@ /.£# Pitot Corr. Factor ,$%
Nozzle Dia. ,ZfTin. , Probe Length ft
Probe Heater Setting O ^
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter ££ in^fc
Inside Area . ft^
Height ft
)
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading77^,
ft3
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
ml
Silica Gel Container No. ?
s;i
f 3.>tf
3.Sf
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
^y
r t
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
loo
//£
/Z3
/i^
/Z7
/2?
Out
/o/
/£
/^7
/37
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
Last
Impirger
Test
(°F)
^<^
^y
63
5-^
s-
/&/
Z,c
Z.e
-------
3ort and
Traverse
Point No.
y
r
t>
7
?
..
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
<+l.f
Wlf
¥1*?
VlSf
fiof
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
*/£0
Irt.l
g2->,2
225;?
tzs.8
#33. £
$3$. S
f1l
,%o
S*,S£>
*Xt>
?>fc
Actual
l6
•ft-
'?*-
v-jf
l.9f
X.86
S,%&
tt>*3O
6>,3c>
^/J,
2.2
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
^
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)'
In
/^
/23
/li.
/IS
/*¥
M
/32-
/3r
/3£
/3/
/9
II
Out
M
10%
/0$
I/O
l/f
111
//2-
y/a-
//^
//y
n-c
;
-------
Plant J?pjfD£A/
IGIN_,JNG, ^fc,
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location STotffi££ T>M/*
Date /-2*/-72- Run No. /
/5/A/A FLA
Time Start /2.' 2O Time End
Sampling Time/Point 2./, /g^
MoistureZ 7*%, FDA 97' £? Gas Density Factor
Barometric Press ^Tcl'Hg. Stack Press
Weather
L°F> W/D — ,W/S ""
Sample Box No, / Meter Box No.
Meter AH@ /»7^itot Corr. Factor i
/
Nozzle Dia._/Vin., Probe Length
1 ^ •'" t "' _ —
Probe Heater Setting_ ^ o%
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area__.
Height ~
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /S?' 3-S "7 ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading ~?2.,/3~7
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container
Orsat:
C02_
°2 _
CO _
N2 _
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: /?>?//».<:. A-
Remarks :
L o /}
ft
Vr7o X £•/»/" .<"
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
O •+£> \
j&u.** '
pnnvifl **~ I
( 2
3
^- v
5"
£
7
Distance
from End
of Port
(in.)
J" •
3
s
7
Cf
11
13
Clock
Time
«^
~-
—
/Z!Z^
/^2-',2S
/2.132-
7:2. ',3&
Gas Meter
Reading
Cft3)
, —
—
— .
"7StH-
7~7.*f
^/,i-
?s5",5
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
. •
-—
r.
o./d
,€D« X&
<0i 7^
^^f^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C'H20)
Calc.
>-
l\n
-— —
,1/2,
l,.o£
3,, 20
3.^
Actual
—
E^-flr/i
— _
.¥2-
l*o£
3,2.0
3.^
Stack Gas
Temp.
^~
/f |/£-^,
^ '
~7^
75"
75-
IS'
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
C°F)
In
Out
VI
—
?'3
.^u
^2^
^
., —
S"3
rif ?
V ^
fj
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
^—
—
— .
— .
—
—
-r-
Last
Mpirger
Test
«?rr~
««— .
77
75-
7^"
7^
Vacuuir;
on I
Samplej
Train
("Hg)
'--*
. .
• — •
//^
,2»
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc. Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
ra-
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
ra
Vacuum
on *1
Sample j
Train
17
in
/ 'v-
e?' o
II
/Z
73
JLt
2;
23
2S
27
/o7-
JSLIJ..
3.7(9
7V
"75
7,5"
75
7',?
_Zi£.
n
31
37
/3:/2
J2£
7
33'
3.y<
7
/375"
.
7S
7?
77
7; *
7
zo
)3>'2g
2*L
Z/
13^2-
/37
2.2-
/o.
o.
3-,
7.5"
77
2.3
5-55
3.35
/37
1*4
/33_
V,
.r
-------
Plant
fifLL
GROJ HAL BIN! ."KG, _..
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
FV
Sampling Location^;
Date A- 2 '<°lf, W/D_
Sample Box No. I
Meter AHg /-?2,Pitot Corr.
Nozzle Dia. fy in., Probe
Probe Heater Setting
Meter Box No.
Stack Dimensions: Inside Diameter
Inside Area
Height
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
Total Condensate in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No
Orsat: C02
. ^PT>1
Filter
,W/S
02 _
CO _
N2 _
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by:
&-
/?.
Remarks:
' HECTfyfiJf. u L*fL
^
H
*>
f
Distance
from End
' of Port
(in.)
)"
3
$
7
II
) ^
Clock
Time
—
_ —
. —~
/«•/', 0 I/
i \. / /\ -f
\ ! 1 ^' O
I ' / ; / 2.
I^'.U
'*? "X 79 "
Gas Meter
Reading
(£t3)
—
— -
— .
Ifo.s
/fe3i
_ —
n^.3
• Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
^
—
~«— -
O«3o
o.^o
rt .^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
~_
W r .
•> f
|.iS
^•£/5
31 f
•bl)
Actual
<••••—
c/?r/ ^/
, —
.3L,\
/ • 15"
2,t/5
3 - 4.6
Stack Gas
Temp.
— —
r PFLH
. — -.
IS
75
7S
Gas Sample
Temp.@ Dry
Gas Meter
In
—
C,/'i- 'f
~
\\->-
//v
/2'j
Out
.„,
C
,^-
lo"i
A- o
/<9"7
fc-7
Sample
Box
Temp.
^,
- —
f " - -
—.
— .
. —
. —
Last
Impinge r
Test
. —
—
.. —
f?r
T" ^
??7 I
Vacuum
on
Samplej
Train
("Hg)
.
_^ —
/• '••
* . " •
L/'3
. c, .?
-------
Port and
Traverse
Point No,
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
Clock
Time
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
Stack
Velocity
Head
C"H20)
Meter
Orifice
Press .Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
Actual
Stack Gas
Temp.
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
Out
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp.
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
I 20
•75"
-6-3
0
75"
/o
h
3.
75
/33
-p ;
131
//1L
75
*G> / 1
7J-
13*
31
/*/.'? z
A??
n
3^5"
/.?$?
3$
75
U
57
IS'.M
2.0
3A
•»> »»*. / *
* w* ^? W'B
**""• '**• * '
75*
13.
* ' >•• |
234% 7
2£
^
51
^Y/>/
i "> <-)
¥ t. ,-'
//t * *^
4-0
n
3.35
//Y
-------
_.7lRO'.-_JTAL _fclNL_.jNG,' ...I.
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
DB
ant y>tfvd-,'/ ,/XT^A-I P ;/,"-/ /2f.i -VV i •''- Mat'l Processing Rate
jnpling Location '!*>;•,• <•'/•/ ., ,-.,.,7 •'-- >
te 1 / 7^j 7 1 Run No. £
me Start / ^/^ Time End j^il/
impling Time/Point "f /-'•// y?J ' £"•//•"' '''
^"^ °F, WB ^/^F, VF @ DP ^^ "Hg
isture^'f | , FDA fA^ , Gas Density Factor
rometric Press1?^ "Hg, Stack Press JO "Hg
ather x ., -,- •.
mp. ':^ ~ °F, W/D ,W/S
imple Box No. / Meter Box No. /
ter AH@/>/ Pitot Corr. Factor /?. S-
zzle Dia.-'-"/ in., Probe Length /f ft
obe Heater Setting 1uJ'^
ack Dimensions: Inside Diameter '/& in
Inside Area . ft^
Height ft
^-ff- /^rea =• , 213 ^ ^
V
Final Gas Meter Reading 3^? & . / ^ */ ^'c
Initial Gas Meter Reading 2."^ 9-'5> £ ? ft
Total Condensate in Impingers <-J/
Moisture in Silica Gel "3L.
Silica Gel Container No.o"/^ Filter No.^
Orsat: C0?
02
CO
ml 7^-
mf
12QH
i
K'2
Excess
Air
Test Conducted by: J, ^ ,^,-l/T ^ /'j'^j-^ -*z
~i~~: <./,> ..'""' //
'
Remarks: ^s/t^rt-^-!^'/ /
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
•i i '•— /
fot\**£? 1
1
2
_?
•1
*j •
«
?
Distance '
from End
of Port
(in.)
}"
3
•7
/>
?
';
/3
Clock
Time
^
—
—
— .
i.'/2
y,r^
1 ' -. ,\
• , * (. '-•-'
•|'V>/
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
A/-^^
2-1 5-55?
:i'i6. B
34 fc ^
.•-->.i;^/
^.^o- -/
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
//-:'
> /^ *
>l - ''"'I
0,^5"
> 3.^
> ^^r
- f-0
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
C"H20)
Calc.
,
, V*
' f ~-
/ £•
y /
/.- (,"•
'f.f
Actual
;2 2.
/-<•
/^
>v7
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
M
>f
;>v"
y-7
Gas Sample
Temp.!? Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
/^
//6
• ">
!\
' ' -
Out
10 2
/ f*~i
I o>..>
/^
/J5
Sample
Box
Temp.
C°F)
Last
Mpirger
Test
C°F)
«f*
?o
W
?o
,
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
<£/
J
s'
o
^. r
-------
1 ^
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
f
• "?
J!
*v
)'$
/•/
K-
/ /
/' •'
/ •',
'• -/
' ' .-
: ' .-'
~ " ' ;
'- ,'
' ;
Distance
from End
of Port
(in)
/v
)*/
I?
o /
?.$
?-'/
?-?
-; f'X
.•- . ''
v. /
'•. /
;• '••.
"*3 ' •*
* f ,
X
.V /
-7 /
•;>-
• / - r
* i *•"'
•1?
Clock
Time
./•w; •
-7; /£•
-TJ/6
^/7.^>
-/?2-f
^/ $ z e
4-1Z
V 36
1 W
J<'14
4;i$
•I < 7-2
-i'rt
/~ i r-'Tj
-7 ' Lj\s
'"I')'}
$;o6
r- ' i •-,
y > / f-
~7
., : y
2^ >- 6
Z'>?.*£
2-fa ?$> 5
ZW'S
5c4-3
50%- 7
'<*$• 1
^r/-5
Z2Z-0
12.6. 4
•". "' >- t ''.
£>r./tf-y
Stack
Velocity
Head
C'H20)
- W/'
, r^
-<7/
, f /
-W
>
<$?
*37
•%7
<$Z
, so
•31
A?.?..
•80.
' / C(?
- ;><7
- r
-J>..gl
?t?
$'f
M
5 4
^r
>/
?--/
<>•;
)>/
'
Actual
'
?'£
/,7
J'f
J^
4^
*-?
$•£
3*9
5.-.f
^f
<-4
^>
,^^
?- ^;
*-/
3v/
/?AA
3.^
Stack Gas
Temp.
C°F)
7r
7r
/y
^
'v-.'—
X
>->"
y^— ^^
/-I
^
/r
'/f
*'-, .-*•
/ -•
y-:;
'/-s~
te
^
/''/"
/r
7^
Gas Sample
Temp.S Dry
Gas Meter
C°F) .
In
/J-^
/?^
/.^/
/?^
/?'/
/tt
tf~
r$*
/?<<
/??
IS%
KG
/3$
/.&
lyf
' ~* ?
/-1&
/^
Out
/ - ^
; -
S/tf
/OS
I/O
// £>
f/t
// 2
HZ
//V
/M
II?
//£
a-
!/6
.'.• x-
'/ o
//^
It?
7
Sample
Box
Temp,
(°F)
Last
Impinger
Temp,
(°F)
#9
fk?
^^>
<70
£?
e •>
n ,-
?':"'
c •>
(i /
,<'o"
Vacuum
on *'
Sample
Train
^iP
£'J5~
^^~
^
/-.,(<
/ X
il* ' °
c - <-
/•^
/'>
/-.-/ 1
*• 1>
^/-
/•
^'.,.
i
.'•' '
I v ' • i
, ' !
i
' •* i
•'• j
,
f
-------
GRAB SAMPLE COLLECTION
-------
Mo.
o,
Daf
D • «*.
romT
uf e ,°F
7S"
?*. O
f
S.
. o^.^/M
OnU TcOo
P
-------
-i^-a-
lc. Mo.
Ran Mo.
I
Dai
//Z-V/7 2-
H
I 2.jf
6)v\|vA |u)D
S
p |g
-------
avtl
$
l\ n fi-Of -e—v^ dWg ^ixvi of trU«g»—<
Wo.
Run Mo.
Daf
z : 2.2.
H
Z,
fluorides
-------
EPA
Wo.
sr/y f 6
S>
Run Mo.
-2-
2-
2-
Daf
e
2-,'2-Z
,°F
74
7V
7S~
H
PeOs
AUtals
-------
5Z
7
EPA SWle. Mo.
o.
Da-fe.
"Tern
are %
°
Mat^ls
V ^-^ >^1-XL? t^"a-t2r-T»1
\
\
-------
Mo.
S"/
Daf
e.
we.
•F
7S-
H
2,
z,
Pa Os
\
-------
APPENDIX C
Standard Analytical Procedures
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
. . Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Reply to
Atln °J: ' • Dau: 12-21-72
Subject: summary of Fluoride Analysis
T" » •
' R: Neulicht, EMB, IRL . •
• This memorandum is in response to your request for a brief
summary of our SPADNS-Zirconium Lake procedure for determination
of fluoride in stack emission samples.
Samples received in our laboratory are filtered through
fluoride free paper filters to yield water soluble and water insoluble
portions. The water insoluble particulate collected on the filter
is rinsed throughly to be sure that all water soluble fluoride is
rinsed through. The water soluble fraction is distilled from sul-
furic acid to a maximum temperature of 180 C. If chloride is suspected
in the sample Ag So. is added to the still. SPADNS solution is added
to an aliquot of the distillate and the absorbance is read at 570 nm.
The concentration of the sample is determined from a calibration curve
prepared from standard fluoride solutions. It is very important that
the temperature of the samples be the same as that of the standards
when absorbances are recorded.
The water insoluble fraction of the sample is evaporated to dry-
ness in the presence of a slurry or
-------
APPENDIX E
Project Participants
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Name , Titl e
John Dollar Project Manager
George Allen Environmental Specialist
Ray Black % Environmental Specialist
John Cutts Environmental Specialist
Bob Durgan Environmental Specialist
Dennis Falgout Environmental Specialist
Albert Henderson Environmental Specialist
Tom Tucker -, : . Environmental Specialist
Larry Hurts Environmental Specialist
Jerome Rom EPA
John Reynolds EPA
Roy Neulicht EPA
------- |