SN 16544.008
Test Number FA-5
Union Carbide Corporation
Ferroalloys Division
Alloy, West Virginia
by
T.E. Eggleston / R.N. Allen
June, 1972
RESOURCES RESEARCH, INC.
A SUBSIDIARY OF TRW INC.
WESTGATE PARK • 7600 COLSHIRE DRIVE • McLEAN, VIRGINIA 22101
Contract Number CPA 70-81
-------
SN 16544.008
Test Number FA-5
Union Carbide Corporation
Ferroalloys Division
Alloy, West Virginia
by
T. E. Eggleston/R. N. Allen
June, 1972
Resources Research, Inc.
A Subsidiary Of TRW Inc.
Westgate Park
7600'Col shire Drive
McLean, Virginia 22101
Contract Number CPA 70-81
-------
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
INTRODUCTION
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
PROCESS OPERATION
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
DISCUSSION
A. Results
B. Operatino Conditions ....
C. Test Conditions
APPENDIX
A. Complete Parti cul ate Results with
Example Calculations
B. Complete Gaseous Results with
Page
... 3
. . . 6
. . . 15
. . . 19
. . . 24
. . . 25
. . . 26
. . . 26
. . . 29
. . . 30
. . . 36
Example Calculations
C. Complete Operation Results
D. Field Data
E-l. Sampling Procedures
E-2. Cleanup and Analytical Procedures
F. Laboratory Report
G. Test Logs
H. Related Reports
I. Project Participants and Titles
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page
1 Collection Efficiency 6
2 Summary of Results - Inlet 7
3 Summary of Results - Outlet 8
Plus Appendices A, B, C, D, F, and G
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Title
Block Diagram - Sample Locations
Run No. 1 - Material Balance - 1/17/72
Run No. 2 - Material Balance - 1/18/72
Run No. 3 - Material Balance - 1/20/72
Process Flow Diagram
Exhaust Collection Layout
Baghouse Exhaust Sample Location
Sample Point Locations
Inlet Velocity Traverse Points
Page
4
12
13
14
16
17
20
21
23
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Source emission tests are being performed on a series of electric
furnace installations, known as reactive metals or ferroalloys, for the
Office of Air Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. This report
covers the tests performed at the Union Carbide Corporation plant, Alloy,
West Virginia, during the week of January 17, 1972. The tests at this
facility include grain loading measurements and carbon monoxide determi-
nations.
Emissions for this particular plant were determined for a silicon
metal furnace (No. 7) rated at 17 megawatts. This unit was hooded, with
duct work leading to the induced draft fans, that directed exhaust fumes
to three individual baghouses in parallel. Tapping fumes were exhausted
through a separate uncontrolled system.
The 58-foot long,7.5 foot wide monitor exhaust from baghouse 7B was
provided with twelve properly spaced ports for equal area sampling. The
11.5 foot square inlet duct had four properly spaced ports provided approxi-
mately 40 feet after a disturbance where the circular duct became retangular.
Sample point locations are shown in Figure 1. Further detailed diagrams
and descriptions are included in Sections IV and V (Process Description and
Location of Sampling Points).
-------
I ATMOSPHERE
(ATMOSPHERE^
QUARTZ
ORES
ELECTRICAL
POWER
CARBON
REDUCING
AGENTS
FLUXES, ETC.
ELECTRODES
CHUTES
CHUTES
/HOOD
ELECTRIC ARC
FURNACE
DUST
COLLECTION
SYSTEM
TAPPING EXHAUST
HOOD
LADLE
0
SAMPLE
LOCATIONS
PRODUCT
MOLDS
FIGURE!.
BLOCK D I AG R A M - S A M P L E LOG AT I O N S
F UR NACE NO. 7
-------
The abatement equipment was a set of three baghouses in parallel;
the one sampled having Nomex bags, the others were equipped with fiber-
glass cloth bags. Three overall particulate collection efficiency tests
were conducted. Each exhaust test included four sample trains, each
covering one-fourth of the exhaust stack area. These runs were believed
to be typical of normal operating conditions.
During this particular survey particulate matter was sampled using
a standard EPA train as described in Appendix E-l. Through the courtesy
of Union Carbide one single sample was obtained at the inlet duct with an
ASME train which overlapoed sample ABD-3 at the inlet duct (EPA test).
Combustion gases were measured using an Orsat analyzer. Ambient air and
baghouse exhaust particulate loadings were also measured using high volume
air samplers. Carbon monoxide was measured at the inlet location using an
infrared analyzer. The overall survey included 16 particulate emission
runs, two Orsat measurements, six Hi Vol samples, triplicate gas velocity
measurements into all the baghouses, induced air measurements for all bag-
houses, and a continuous measurement of CO emissions for two hours.
-------
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Shown below, in Table I, are the results and averages for inlet and
exhaust testing of the baghouse system, along with the corresponding col-
lection efficiencies.
TABLE I
Overall Summary of Emissions and Collection Efficiency
Combined
No. 7B Exhaust (Outlet) No. 7A, 7B. 7C Inlet Duct
Filterable Total Compartment B-14 Filterable Total 7B
1972 Run Particulate Particulate Part. Filtered Particulate Particulate Percent
Date No. Ibs/hr - EPA Ibs/hr - EPA Ibs/hr - Hi Vol Ibs/hr - ASME Ibs/hr - EPA Efficiency
1/17/72 One 7.9 11.3 3.53 2870 99.1
1/18/72 Two 8.5 13.8 2.36 2010 98.5
1/19/72 Three 2020 2510
1/20/72 Four 4.4 10.3 2.06 2560 99.1
Average 6.9 11.8 2.65 2360 98.9
Particulate emission summaries for the baghouse inlet duct and monitor
exhaust are shown in Tables 2 and 3 on the following pages. Flue gas condi-
tions are included, and percent particulate matter in the impinger train has
been calculated. This "condensible" portion was extremely low prior to the
collection system.
Gas temperatures and velocities within the monitor, at the exhaust
sampling location, remained ouite stable, but temperatures on the roof,
-------
TABLE 2
BAGHOUSE INLET DUCT
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Run Number
Date
Total Stack Flow Rate - SCFM* dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
°L C02 - Vol 7, dry
% 02 - Vol % dry
7» Excess air (? sampling point
SOp Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
2£
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry (Can)
/-i
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions ( at)
Q
lbs./hr. (aw)
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry ( ao)
Q
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions ( au)
lbs./hr. (°ax)
Stack Temperature, °F
ABD-1
1/17/72
407.000
0.3
NA
NA
0.815
0.562
2840
1.1
0.824
0.568
2870
300
ABD-2
1/18/72_
430.000
0.5
NA
NA
0.538
0.368
1980
1.3
0.545
0.373
2010
300
ABD-3
1/19/72
392.000
1.7
NA
NA
0.742
0.498
2490
0.6
0.746
0.501
2510
310
ABD-4
1/20/72
399.000
1.7
NA
NA
0.723
0.487
2470
3.4
0.748
0.504
2560
307
ORSAT
1/20/72
0 Q
u • y
on 7
L\J . 1
opn/1
OoUU
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
-------
TABLE 3
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol 7» dry
% 02 - Vol 7o dry
7, Excess air & sampling point
S09 Emissions - ppm dry
NO, Emissions - ppm dry
'
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature °F
AEE-1
1/17/72
**
57,040
n
NA
lin
NA
0.0085
0.0070
4.15
07 c
o/ . D
.0136
n HITS
6.65-
IftO
ECE-1
1/17/72
**
57,040
0.0039
0.0032
1.90
oc r\
^0 . U
OAAC O
.0052
Onn/io
. UUHO
2.52
isn
WCE-l
1/17/72
**
57,040
0.0018
0.0015
0.88
01 7
c.\ , 1
Onnoo
.(JU^O
Onnio
. uu i :?
1.12
IftO
AWE-1
MM/12
57,040*
0.0019
0.0016
0.92
***
c 0
o. u
Onn^n
.UU^U
n nm fi
U . UU 1 D
0.98
IRQ
BAGHOUSE
TOTAL-1
MM/12
**
228,150
_
_
7.85
11.27
*70°F, 29.92" Hg
**(Assumes 1/4 of total flow was in each section)
***See Discussion
8
-------
TABLE 3 (Cont.)
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST (cont.)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7» Water Vapor - % Vol.
7, C02 - Vol °L dry
7, 02 - Vol % dry
7o Excess air & sampling point
SO,, Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature °F
AFF-2
1/18/72
70 .4l8*
0
MA
lin
MA
INM
0.0087
0.0067
5.25
22.3
0.0112
Onnc?
. uuo/
6.75
99n
ECE-2
1/18/72
70.41*)*
0
0.0018
0.0014
0.95
52.6
0.0038
On(i9Q
. \j\j£.y
2.30
99n
WCE-2
1/18/72
70,41$*
0
0.0023
0.0018
1.40
43.9
0.0041
Onnoo
. UUO£
2.47
99D
AWE-2
1/18/72
70,410*
0
0.0014
0.0011
0.85
63.2
0.0038
OnnoQ
. \J\JL. :3
2.30
9?n
BAGHOUSE
TOTAL- 2
1/18/72
281 ,650*
_
T
8.45
13.82
*70°F, 29.92" Hg
**(Assumes 1/4 of total flow was in each section)
-------
TABLE 3 (Cont.)
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST (cont.)
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7o Water Vapor - °L Vol.
7» CO 2 -Vol 7. dry
7,, 02 - Vol 7o dry
7» Excess air (? sampling point
'.'SO * Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Stack Temperature °F
AEE-3
1/20/72
**
67.410
One
. uo
NA
MA
0.0026
Qnn?i
. UU£ 1
1.50
O7 O
0.0036
OnnoQ
. uu^iy
2.08
200
ECE-3
1/20/72
**
67.410
Ocn
• ou
0.0018
Onnol
. UU£ 1
1.05
Cft C
0.0059
Or\c\n~i
. LHr/4/
3.40
200
WCE-3
1/20/72
**
67,410
Ore
. 33
0.0017
Onm A
. UU 1 1
0.97
cc ^
0.0039
r n nmi
U . UU<3 1
2.25
200
AWE- 3
1/20/72
**
67,410
n n?
u. u/
0.0015
Onm ?
i UU 1 (.
.88
CO C
0.0040
Onm?
. UUoc
2.30
200
BAGHOUSE
TOTAL-.-?
1/20/72
269, 650*
4.40
10.03
OR SAT
_
_
n 9
U. i-
?n ?
£U . /
ci on
0 1 UU
~~
_
*70°F, 29.92" Hg
**(Assumes 1/4 of total flow was in each section)
10
-------
where equipment and personnel were located, depended upon the weather and
wind direction. Flue gas conditions at the combined inlet duct were also
rather stable.
A comparison of one single EPA and ASME test, conducted on the inlet
duct, indicates that the ASME train collects 20% less particulate than the
EPA train. Air flow measurements indicate that approximately 32% of the
effluent gas from B baghouse is induced air. Carbon monoxide levels in
the inlet duct ranged from 25 to 190 ppm, but were generally around 50 ppm
with occasional peaks. Fume capture at Furnace 7 is essentially 100%
during normal operation.
The Hi Vol samples taken in compartment B-14 (MCE) ranged from 0.52
Ibs/hr to 0.88 Ibs/hr and averaged 0.66 Ibs/hr (assuming 1/4 total baghouse
flow to be in that comaprtment). The corresponding samples taken with the
EPA train (WCE 1, 2 & 4), considering only the filterable fraction, ranged
from 0.88 Ibs/hr to 1.40 Ibs/hr and averaged 1.08 Ibs/hr.
An overall presentation of the results are presented in material
balance format in Figures 2, 3, and 4 on the following pages.
11
-------
21,900 scfm
0.824 gr/scf
154.7 Ib/hr
NORTH
AMBIENT
10,000 acfm
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7C
31,900 scfm
0.0058 gr/scf
1.59 Ib/hr
y
163,000 scfm
0.824 gr/scf
1151.1 Ib/hr
207,200 scfm
0.824 gr/scf
1463.2 Ib/hr
AMBIENT
65,150 acfm
0.0005 gr/scf
0.28 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7B
228,150 scfm
0.0058 gr/scf
11.27 Ib/hr
_FURNACE #5_
LEAKAGE !
16,000 scfm L
0.72 gr/scf r
99 Ib/hr. i
j
TOTAL i
407,000 scfm
0.824 gr/scf
2870 Ib/hr
AMBIENT
113,900 acfm
0.0005 gr/scf
0.49 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7A
321,100 scfm
0.0058 gr/scf
15.96 Ib/hr
o o o o
Assumptions: a.
b.
Grain loading for No. 5 Furnace
same as No. 7 Furnace.
Baghouses A & C operation identi-
cal to B.
Figure 2. Run No. 1 - Material Balance
1/17/72
12
-------
21,900 scfm
0.545 gr/scf
102.3 Ib/hr
NORTH
216,500 scfm
0.545 gr/scf
1011.2 Ib/hr
AMBIENT
10,000 acfm
0.0004 gr/scf
0.034 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7C
31,900 scfm
0.0057 gr/scf
1.56 Ib/hr
204,100 scfm
0.545 gr/scf
953.3 Ib/hr'
TOTAL |
430,000 scfm
0.545 gr/scf
2010 Ib/hr
_ jFURNACE #_5
I LEAKAGE
I 16,000 scfm
i 0.72
I 99
o o o o
AMBIENT
65,150 acfm
0.0004 gr/scf
0.24 Ib/hr
AMBIENT
113,900 acfm
0.0004 gr/scf
0.39 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7B
281,650 scfm
0.0057 gr/scf
13.82 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
; SECTION
: 7A
i318,000 scfm
0.0057 gr/scf
15.53 Ib/hr
_. J
_.._._ I
Assumptions: a.
b.
Grain loading for No. 5 Furnace
same as No. 7 Furnace.
Baghouses A & C operation identi-
cal to B.
Figure 3. Run No. 2 - Material Balance
1/18/72
13
-------
21,900 scfm
0.748 gr/scf
140.4 Ib/hr
NORTH
204,500 scfm
0.748 gr/scf
1310.9 Ib/hr
AMBIENT
10,000 acfm
0.0004 gr/scf
0.034 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7C
31,900 scfm
0.0044 gr/scf
1.20 Ib/hr
204,100 scfm
0.748 gr/scf
1308.4 Ib/hr
AMBIENT
65,150 acfm
0.0004 gr/scf
0.22 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
SECTION
7B
269,650 scfm
0.0044 gr/scf
10.03 Ib/hr
TOTAL I
399,000 scfm ;
0.748 gr/scf
2560 Ib/hr
FURNACE #_5
LEAKAGE
16,000 scfm
0.72 gr/scf r
99 Ib/hr i
j
i
AMBIENT
113,900 acfm
0.0004 gr/scf
0.39 Ib/hr
BAGHOUSE
i SECTION
7A
:318,000 scfm
* 0.0044 gr/scf
11.99 Ib/hr
Assumptions:
a. Grain loading for No. 5 Furnace
same as No. 7 Furnace.
b. Baghouses A & C operation identi-
cal to B.
Figure 4. Run No. 3 - Material Balance
1/20/72
14
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Reactive metals are generally ferroalloys which are produced in
submerged arc electric furnaces. The facility under consideration in
this report is an open furnace, with hooding and baghouse filtering
systems to reduce the emission of fumes and dust^following collection.
Figures 5 and 6 are process flow diagrams indicating the actual furnace
under test in this survey.
The electric arc is employed as a concentrated source of heat.
Quartzite is added to the surface of the furnace through mechanized equip-
ment and chutes. Additional carbon in the form of coke, wood chips,
etc., is an integral part of the furnace mix, along with specialized
fluxes, etc. The mix is added directly to the surface of the furnace
through chutes and is then spread over the surface with stoking machines.
The very high temperatures produced initiate a reaction in the
bottom of the furnace and form a layer of metal which is tapped at
appropriate times. As the ores and carbonaceous materials gradually
settle to the bottom of the furnace, the heat, in conjunction with a
lack of oxygen, causes the carbon to react with the oxide ores in order
to remove oxygen and thus produce the elemental metal. Escaping gases,
composed largely of carbon monoxide, are burned at the surface of the
furnace in the so-called open units.
15
-------
#7 Furnace
I I
I I
r 1
i_#5 Furnace J
_^ #5 Baghouse
.SAMPLING PORTS
VELOCITY
PORTS
v^x
. >
EXHAUST
UOI
M
INDUCED AIR
Figure 5. Process Flow Diagram
(side view)
-------
North
Furnace #5
Furnace #7
7\
Fan
Baghouse Section 7C
Fan
r
AEE
ECE
WCE
AWE
Baghouse Section 7B
Fan
o o o o
I
\ I
/ i
Baghouse Section 7A
r
i
i
u
Figure 6. Exhaust Collection Layout
(top view)
17
-------
Furnace 7 is a nominal 17 megawatt unit producing silicon metal
using prebaked rectangular electrodes in a line. Induced draft fans are
employed to pull fumes into the exhaust system. Gases and fumes from the
i
normal furnace operation are passed through three parallel baghouses for
cleaning, prior to discharge into the atmosphere. The collection of fumes
around the furnace is almost 100 percent effective during normal operation.
A page of technical data is shown in Appendix C.
The furnace is tapped at intervals of approximately two hours, depend-
ing upon the total power fed and thereby the amount of metal produced.
Molten metal and slag pour into ladles. Fumes produced in this operation
are drawn off by a separate exhaust fan. The collection of these fumes
was nearly 80 or 90 percent effective when observed, but this material is
emitted to the atmosphere without subsequent cleaning. Molten product is
poured into molds, after which it is broken into usable sizes.
18
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Sample port locations were selected where most satisfactory during
a presurvey inspection trip, and approved by the EPA Project Officer. |
On the collector inlet side, four ports were selected on the top of the
rectangular horizontal duct, in the middle of a straight section. The
inlet duct required a framework to suspend the sampling train over the
ports, capable of moving the train horizontally and vertically. As
shown in Figure 5 the cross section of this duct was divided into seven
equal layers, thus forming a sample profile with 28 equal areas. Partic-
ulate tests were conducted for five minutes at the centroid of each area.
Twelve ports were selected at the baghouse exhaust monitor. These
locations were not ideal, but were in the only available location. Special
platforms were required due to the slope of the roof. All sampling ports
and platforms were provided by the Union Carbide plant. Figures 6 and 7
show a simplified cross-section of the system under test and indicate the
relative location of sampling ports. Four EPA trains were employed at
this one location, one for each three ports. Only two points were to be
sampled from each port, as shown in Figure 8.
These downstream sampling locations were agreed upon as acceptable,
although they do not meet the normal criteria as established by EPA. The
location should have no significant effect on the results due to the small
particle size and low concentration of emissions from baghouses. Further
comments regarding these problems are found in the Discussion, Section VIII
19
-------
ro
o
FLOW i
i
i
i
r L o w
^
Baghouse 7C
Baghouse 7 B
Figure 7- Baghouse Exhaust Sample Location
-------
A B D
r
fr fi
o o
0 0
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O 0
1. 1
h
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
.'„"
^
ft
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
11
t
< E
AEE ECE WCE AWE
r ^ f- ^ r ^\ f \
ABABCABCABC
ooooooooooo
o o o o o o o o o
< -fl' rl
« -0 »|
BA6HOUSE OUTLET
TOP UTFU
1 Ur V1LW
T
7'6'
1
FURNACE EXHAUST DUCT
END VIEW
Figure 8. Sample Point Locations
-------
Because the Furnace 7 baghouse system actually contained three
separate "houses" and exhausts, yet the inlet was sampled for the
total furnace emission, it became necessary to measure the split of
individual gas volumes being directed into the three units. Figure 9
indicates the cross sectional view of the ducts leading into the respective
induced draft fans.
High volume air samples were taken at two locations. The ambient
samples were taken under the middle of "B" baghouse at about 8 feet above
the ground level. The samples inside the baghouse were taken from a point
above the bags, in the exhaust gas stream inside compartment B-14 (sample
point WCE).
22
-------
5'
olO
o 9
o 8
o 7
o 6
o 5
o 4
o 3
o 2
0 1
1-
A
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
H
B
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
hd
C
10
Figure 9. Inlet Velocity Traverse Points
23
-------
VI. PROCESS OPERATION
Practically all sampling was carried out while the process was
running normally. There were periods with furnace "blows" or minor
process load variations but these special conditions were considered
normal operating conditions.
.Confusion existed as to whether fumes from Furnace 5 were being
dampered out of the No. 7 furnace duct. It was determined that part of
Furnace 5 fumes (5% of the total flow in No. 7 duct) were, in fact,
being ducted into the No. 7 duct. The damper was left in this configu-
ration for the remainder of the test period. The leakage caused some
mixing of collected fumes going into the respective dust collection silos.
This prevents accurate use of information supplied concerning weight of
material collected by the baghouses. Figures supplied indicate that
43,400 Ibs. were collected in No. 5 silo in 79.5 hours and 68,440 Ibs.
were collected in No. 7 silo in 68 hours.
Appendix C tabulates the available operating data. There were some
fluctuations in the furnace load during testing, but these were considered
to be within normal operating conditions. Tapping was conducted as often
as necessary, depending upon the total power input to the furnace.
24
-------
VII. SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Test methods were in accordance with the standard methods as pub-
lished in the Federal Register, Volume 36, Number 159, Part II, on August
17, 1971. See Appendix E for pertinent sections of this publication.
Deviations from the above methods were as follows:
1. At the inlet, only 7 equal area points of 8 on each traverse
were sampled. (Reason: Duct too deep to reach last point
with 10' probe.)
2. Sampling was in the monitor at the outlet.
(Reason: No stack available, criteria not applicable.)
Carbon monoxide was measured using a MSA LIRA* model 200 infrared
analyzer and results were recorded continuously on a strip chart recorder.
High volume air samples were taken using standard Hi Vol air samplers
with 8" x 10" glass fiber filters. See Appendix E-l.
*Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
25
-------
VIII. DISCUSSION
A. RESULTS
Collection Efficiency
The efficiency of 7B baghouse was in the range of 98 - 99 percent.
Calculations are based upon the inlet concentration, and the Section 7B
exhaust concentration, along with some assumptions. (It is necessary to
assume that the ratio of dust flow through 7B baghouse, versus the total
i
dust flow into all baghouses, is also proportional to the measured gas
flow.) Dust concentration in the ambient air induced into the baghouse
averaged 0.25 lbs/hr., which is less than 3% of the average total emissions.
The calculation of efficiency includes the visible loss of dust from a
leaky bag in compartment 18 (sample point AEE).
Baghouse Emissions
Each sample was calculated to give emission rates in Ibs/hr based
upon the air flow through each sample area, assuming the total air flow was
equally split. Concentration of emissions varied from sample point to sample
point as well as from run to run. Considering the extremely small quantities
of material collected, the extremes of temperature, and other test problems
that created extremely difficult working conditions, the results appear to
be reasonably uniform. Whenever conditions dictate, as these did, that the
sampling crews can only remain with their equipment a few moments at a time
without seeking relief, thus preventing close attention to details of equip-
ment operation, it is reasonable to assume that there may be some small
26
-------
effect on the end results. Specific observation of crew performance and
the results indicates that the effect, if any, was very slight.
As expected, the sample obtained from the area with a leaky bag was
appreciably greater in emissions. Ignoring the area containing the leaky
bag, this collector appeared to be capable of reducing total particulate
emissions to approximately 0.004 grains per standard cubic foot or approxi-
mately 10 Ibs/hr. The emission of particulate matter, as caught by the
probe and filter alone, was approximately half of this value of five Ibs/hr.
Particulate concentrations as measured by the high volume air samples were
less than those measured by the front half of the EPA train. This was
true when comparing only filterable particulate matter. A partial explana-
tion for the difference may be the difficulty of obtaining accurate gas
flow in the Hi Vol under high temperature conditions. Two of the Hi Vol
sample results were relatively similar, but the third value was much greater
than either of the other two. More than sufficient weight of particulate
matter was trapped on the large filter for accurate weighing, so unless the
sample position was getting less induced air, there is no explanation.
The above emission values apply only during normal operation, and
cannot be extrapolated to a daily emission without considering the plant
operating factor.
Particulate Versus Total Catch
The filterable particulate matter at the inlet duct ranged from 97
to 99 percent of the total catch. It amounted to approximately three-
27
-------
quarters of a grain per standard cubic foot or some 2500 Ibs/hr. However,
at the exhaust monitor, after nearly 99 percent of the total material had
been removed, the soluble, nonfilterable portion composed an average of
half the total weight. Nonfilterable particulate matter at the exhaust
monitor had a very wide range of values, from approximately 1/4 to 3/4
of the total. Part of this variation would be due to the recovery of
extremely small amounts of material, where accuracy becomes somewhat ques-
tionable.
Flue Gas Conditions
The flue gas volume measured at the combined inlet duct was relatively
stable when considering the variation in normal operating conditions and
the wide variation in velocity within this particular duct. No velocity or
flue gas volume measurements were possible at the exhaust monitor. Total
exhaust flow was based upon the flue gas volume entering the baghouse, in
addition to the induced air flow that was measured for each baghouse by
the use of a rotating vane anemometer.
Gaseous Emissions
As expected, the Orsat analyses indicated very low earbon dioxide
content and correspondingly high oxygen concentrations.
Carbon monoxide measurements were very stable except for occasional
peaks of short duration. These peaks are believed to be due to the normal
operational variations encountered during stoking operations.
28
-------
ASME Test Method
The results of the ASME test were made available through the courtesy
of Union Carbide Corporation, who authorized this sample during the EPA
contract. The ASME test was conducted during and shortly following the
EPA Test No. ABD-3. The ASME result of 2020 Ibs/hr would compare to the
EPA value of 2510 Ibs/hr for the period of time immediately following the
EPA test.
B. OPERATING CONDITIONS
Baghouse System
Early in the sampling survey, it was noted that the portion of the
baghouse being evaluated under samples AEE had a leaking bag, and visible
emissions. The results of testing reflect this higher emission rate. Other
than this single situation the operation of baghouse Section 7B appeared to
be completely normal. Section 7C was leaking rather badly, and was partially
plugged, and the operation of the overall system was affected in that the
remaining two sections were loaded more heavily than usual.
Furnace 7
There were occasional shutdowns, which caused some delay, but none
of these occurred during a sample. Every particulate sample was timed
into the ordinary operating schedule, in order to include two tapping cycles
during the middle of this sample period.
29
-------
Furnace 5
Confusion existed during the first two days of testing, as to whether
the No. 5 furnace was dampered out of the system under tests, as was orig-
inally planned. It was later discovered that some flow was entering the
No. 7 system. The velocity and flue gas volume in the duct entering the
system under test was therefore measured to determine what portion of the
gas was from Furnace 5. Approximately 16,000 scfm (which equals about 4%
of the measured total flow in the No. 7 duct) were coming from Furnace 5
into the test system.
Silo System
In conjunction with the emission test being performed, Union Carbide
personnel supplied measurements of dust collected during the three day
period. This collected dust from the No. 7 silo came to approximately
1600 Ibs/hr. Although this rate figure is lower than the measured inlet
values, two factors play an important part in the difference. Baghouse
7C had major leaks and was emitting a large amount of dust. In addition,
there was considerable furnace down time during the overall period in
which dust was being collected. Taking these factors into consideration,
there is probably no appreciable difference between the two methods of
obtaining an inlet dust loading to the baghouse.
C. TEST CONDITIONS
Inlet Duct
Although there were only four equivalent pipe diameters of straight
flow prior to the inlet sampling location, the duct prior to this obstruc-
30
-------
tion was still in a straight line, but simply in a circular duct. The
velocity traverse indicated that there were wide variations in the flow
pattern, which was caused by channel beams partially blocking flow approxi-
mately one equivalent diameter before the sample location. A good trolley
arrangement provided excellent handling of the EPA train even in the ver-
tical position.
After completion of the first test it was discovered that one of
the four filters had been placed on the wrong side of the glass frit.
A- decision was made to attempt salvage of'the sample, but to repeat the
test in order to be sure of three good runs. The frit was cleaned in
acetone with an ultrasonic cleaner and the results would indicate, that
if anything, the value was on the high side. This would seem feasible
due to the possibility of the frit losing small amounts of the glass
particles.
Exhaust Duct
The monitor configuration of the baghouse did not allow application
of normal procedures for sampling. This phase of the test was a monitor
study, not a normal stack sample. A rough estimate of percent isokinetic
for the samples, assuming an average velocity calculated from the area and
stack flow, gives a range of 125% - 165% isokinetic, with an average of
145% isokinetic. Past experience had shown that particulate matter escaping
from a baghouse is normally composed of very fine particle size, thus
allowing a representative sample to be obtained under non-isokinetic con-
31
-------
ditions. Previous particle size measurements, on a similar installation,
have supported this position, as well as emphasizing the need for a
greater amount of material to be collected and weighed.
Only four 10-foot probes were available, therefore the AEE sample
series was conducted using a 5-foot glass lined probe, while the other
locations employed the 10-foot incaloy lined probe. For this reason, only
the near (No. 1) points could be sampled with this train. Not only was
this compromise necessary, but, due to the closeness of the roof edge and
lack of platform, one port in this same AEE sample series could not be
reached. While all other exhaust samples contained six equal areas, this
location represented only two of those six equal areas. The first sample
obtained at this location was of particularly short duration due to the
melted vacuum line in the umbilical cord.
Power
Individual circuits were available for all testing equipment so that
there were no problems of power failure at any of the five locations.
Filter Plugging
Although the dust loading at the inlet duct was not as great as had
sometimes been experienced at similar plants, it was sufficient, so that
even with four inch filters, it was necessary to replace the filter after
a single sample port had been traversed. This meant that four filters
were normally necessary for every test. There were no deviations necessary
from the standard testing procedures due to this dust loading problem. No
32
-------
particle size evaluation is available, but it would appear that the silicon
furnace may emit a particle that is particularly able to form a dense mat
on a filter surface.
Induced Air
Induced air was measured using a rotary vane anemometer to measure
the air flow around each bag compartment. The anemometer was placed on
the grating, so that calculation of effective open area was necessary. ,
Every other compartment was tested for each of the three baghouses. Each
compartment was measured at ten points within the open area. Part of the
open area was unobstructed but the remainder was covered with grating, i
which was measured at 80% effectively open area. The total open area was
therefore calculated using the above data. The induced gas volume deter-
mined by these measurements was added to the respective measured volume of
flue gas at the individual inlet to the baghouse. This sum produced a
total baghouse exhaust volume.
Individual Velocity
Flue gas volume entering each individual baghouse was measured with
a pitot traverse of the duct immediately preceding that respective induced
draft fan. The entrance pipe nipples on these ducts were somewhat awkward,
and made it very difficult to reach the extreme traverse points. The
velocity appeared to be relatively uniform within each duct, however,
therefore it is believed that no significant errors were introduced because
of this problem.
33
-------
HI VOL Sampling
High volume air samples were obtained without particular problem or
unusual conditions, except for temperature. Procedures for the Hi Vol
samplers have become quite standardized and straightforward. The only
difficulty was in operation of the unit when placed inside the exhaust
duct from the baghouse. This was physically difficult to position. High
temperatures may have some effect upon the gas flow measurements and
induced air flow possibly was not well mixed with the exhaust gas flow.
Miscellaneous Problems
Several problems concentrated upon a single area at the exhaust moni-
tor. AEE samples did not cover the entire area originally designed, and
because of the short 5-foot probe there was an extreme to the already
severe temperature problem. The first sample was considerably shortened
when the umbilical cord was melted and the sample line collasped. Exhaust
gases of 160° to 200°F were directed at each sample location. Depending
upon the direction and temperature of the wind this hot exhaust gas was
very detrimental to both sampling equipment and personnel. Throughout
the entire testing period, difficulty was encountered in keeping all pumps
running due to overheating. It was not possible to operate the meter boxes
from any more acceptable location, and the sample boxes were continually
exposed to heat. Even with makeshift heat deflectors it was not possible to
keep samples properly cooled. In excess of 100 pounds of ice was used each
day, but some samples became so hot that some of the impinger water evaporated.
The silica gel was not able to recover this loss at these high temperatures.
34
-------
Silica gel normally collected only a small amount of water, therefore the
true moisture contents are in doubt. Only during the last test, taken on
a cold rainy day with favorable wind conditions, was there a gain in
condensate for these samples.
While the exhaust location was uncomfortably warm, the opposite
extreme was present at the inlet duct. Dry cell batteries in the ther-
mocouple potentiometer were actually freezing, and affecting thermocouple
readings. All samples the last two days were conducted during rain. Due
to an early misreading of inlet duct temperature, the nomograph was in-
correctly set and isokinetic rates were considerably greater than our
normal accuracy, although they are within the 20% allowance that has been
considered acceptable. We were able to correct or adapt for the problems
encountered with the extremes of weather and location and thus there were
no significant effects on the results of the tests.
The water sample was lost by personnel handling error on exhaust
sample WCE-1, therefore, the amount of soluble particulate matter residue
was not in line with other samples.
35
-------
IX. APPENDIX
36
-------
APPENDIX A
COMPLETE PARTICULATE RESULTS
WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test No. One to Four
Name of Firm Union Carbide
No. Runs Four
Location of Plant_
Type of Plant
Alloy, West Virginia
Reactive Metals
Control Equipment
Baqhouse
Sampling Point Locations Combined Inlet Duct
Pollutants Sampled Total Particul ate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. ABD-1
Date 1/17/72
Begin 1112
End 1440
Run No. ABD-2
Date 1/18/72
Begin 1135
End 141 3
Run No. ABD-3
Date 1/19/72
Begin 0900
End 1145
Run No. ABD-4
Date 1/20/72
Begin 1416
End 1702
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No.
P, barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
P orifice pressure drop, "H-O
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft.3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @
std. Standard Conditions, ft.3
V Total H20 collected, ml., Impingers
& Silica Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
gas ft.3 @ Standard Conditions*
ABD-1
29.94
1.93
97.93
88
95.15
5.7
0.27
ABD-2
29.80
2.25
101.58
91
97.78
11.2
0.53
ABD-3
29.97
1.97
98.84
106
93.08
33.6
1.59
ABD-4
29.99
2.03
102.49
106
96.60
34.4
1.63
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-l
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M-7, Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
7. 02
7. No
M W,j - Molecular weight of dry
stack gas
M W - Molecular weight of stack gas
A Ps - Velocity Head of stack gas,
In.H20
Ts - Stack Temperature, °F
&PS X(TS + 460) (Average)
Ps - Stack Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Vs - Stack Velocity @ stack
conditions, fpm
2
As - Stack Area, in.
Qs - Stack Gas Volume @
Standard Conditions, *SCFM
Tt - Net Time of Test, min.
Dn - Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
%I - Percent isokinetic
mf - Particulate - probe, cyclone
and filter, mg.
mt - Particulate - total, mg
Can - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter, gr/SCF
Cao - Particulate - total, gr/SCF
Cat " Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter,
gr/cf @ stack conditions
ABD-1
0.28
0.997
28.96
28.93
1.25
300
30.05
29.68
4460
19044
407,000
140
0.1875
115
5037.2
5091 . 3
0.8153
0.8240
0.5619
ABD-2
0.54
0.995
29.96
28.91
1.40
300
31.83
29.54
4740
19044
430,000
140
0.1875
112
3414.6
3459.2
0.5378
0.5448
0.3681
ABD-3
1.68
0.983
.
28.96
28.77
1.24
310
29.66
29.71
4410
19044
392,000
140
0.1875
117
4486.2
4511.8
0.7422
0.7464
0.4983
ABD-4
1.66
0.983
u . L
28.96
28.77
1.21
307
30.04
29.73
4470
19044
399,000
140
0.1875
119
4532.9
4691.8
0.7226
0.7480
0.4873
INLET
ORSAT
n Q
20.4
78.7
A-2
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No.
C - Particulate, total, gr/cf
@ stack cond.
C - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
. £LX
% EA- % Excess air @
sampling point
ABD-1
0.5679
2842
2873
ABD-2
0.3729
1981
2007
ABD-3
0.5011
2493
2507
_
ABD-4
0.5045
2471
2556
_
ORSAT
3800
* 7r.o
TO°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-3
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test No. One
Name of Firm
Location of Plant
Type of Plant
Control Equipment
Union Carbide
Alloy, West Virginia
Reactive Metals
Baghouse
No. Runs Four
Sampling Point Locations Across Area of Exhaust Monitor
Pollutants Sampled
Time of Particulate
Run No. AEE-1
Run No. ECE-1
Run No. WCE-1
Run No. AWE-1
Total Particulate
Test:
Date 1/17/72 Begin 1322
Date 1/17/72 Begin 1217
Date 1/17/72 Begin 1130
Date 1/17/72 Begin 1045
Eiid 1430
End 1735
End 1735
End 1 652
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No .
P, barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
P orifice pressure drop, "HpO
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft.3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @
std. Standard Conditions, ft. 3
V Total HpO collected, ml., Impingers
& Silica Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
Wgas ft.3 @ Standard Conditions*
AEE-1
29.94
2.9
73.845
123
67.60
-15.3
-0.73
ECE-1
29.94
2.7
260.29
128
236.14
-64.9
-3.08
WCE-1
29.94
3.0
349.76
143
309.65
•176.2
-8.35
AWE-1
29.94
3.3
366.85
125
335.01
•112.8
-5.35
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-4
-------
PARTICIPATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M-7, Moisture in the stark gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
% Oo
7. No
M W
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No.
C - Particulate, total, gr/cf
@ stack cond.
C - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
'C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
3>X
% EA- % Excess air @
sampling point
AEE-1
0.0113
16.6
26.6
ECE-1
0.0043
7.6
10.1
WCE-1
0.0019
3.5
4.5
AWE-1
0.001-6
3.7
3.9
70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-6
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test No.
TWO
No. Runs Four
Name of Firm
Union Carbide
Location of Plant
Type of Plant
Alloy, West Virginia
Reactive Metals
Control Equipment
Baghouse
Sampling Point Locations Across Area of Exhaust Monitor
Pollutants Sampled Total Participate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. AEE-2
Run No. ECE-2
'Run No. MCE-2
Run No. AWE-2
Date 1/18/72
Date 1/18/72
Date 1/18/72
Date 1/18/72
Begin 1215
End 171 5
Begin 12QQ
End 1800
Begin 1U5
End 1749
Begin 1130
End 1730
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No.
P, "barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
P orifice pressure drop, "HpO
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft.3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @
mstd. Standard Conditions, ft.3
V Total HpO collected, ml. , Impingers
& Silica Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
Wgas ft.3 @ Standard Conditions*
AEE-2
29.80
2.9
316.33
117
291.24
-35.0
-1.66
ECE-2
29.80
2.6
341.85
117
314.50
-48.6
-2.30
WCE-2
29.80
3.3
361 .95
133
324.57
-63.7
-3.02
AWE-2
29.80
3.2
364.72
117
336.04
-64.7
-3.07
* TO°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-7
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M -7, Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
M
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No.
C - Particulate, total, gr/cf
§ stack cond.
C - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
ax '
% EA- % Excess air @
sampling point
AEE-2
0.0087
21.0
27.0
ECE-2
0.0029
3.8
9.2
WCE-2
0.0032
5.6
9.9
AWE-2
0.0029
3.4
9.2
JF, 29.92" Hg.
A-9
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test No. Three
Name of Firm
No. Runs Four
Union Carbide
Location of Plant Alloy. West Virginia
Type of Plant Reactive Metals
Control Equipment
Baqhouse
Sampling Point Locations Across Area of Exhaust Monitor
Pollutants Sampled Total Participate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. AEE-3
Run No. ECE-3
Run No. WCE-3
Run No. AWE-3
Date 1/20/72
Date 1/20/72
Date 1/20/72
Date 1/20/72
Begin 1405
End 2000
Begin 1430
End 1941
Begin 151Q
End 2000
Begin 1500
End 1952
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
Run No.
P, barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
P orifice pressure drop, "HJD
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft. 3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @
std. Standard Conditions, ft. 3
V Total H20 collected, ml., Impingers
& Silica Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
Wgas ft. 3 @ Standard Conditions*
AEE-3
29.99
2.4
336.53
121
309.28
2.9
0.14
ECE-3
29.99
2.9
309.09
125
282.46
32.4
1.54
WCE-3
29.99
3.1
276.80
108
260.65
32.1
1.52
AWE- 3
29.99
3.3
301.23
no
282.80
4.7
0.22
OUTLET
ORSAT
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-10
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M -% Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
% 02
% N2
M W(j - Molecular weight of dry
stack gas
M W - Molecular weight of stack gas
A Ps - Velocity Head of stack gas,
In.HoO
Ts - Stack Temperature, °F
&P8 X(TS + 460) , .
0 . lAveraee )
Ps - Stack Pressure, "Hg. Absolute
Vs - Stack Velocity @ stack
conditions, fpm
o
As - Stack Area, in.
Qs - Stack Gas Volume @
Standard Conditions, *SCFM
Tt - Net Time of Test, min.
D,j - Sampling Nozzle Diameter, in.
7,1 - Percent isokinetic
mf - Particulate - probe, cyclone
and filter, mg.
m^ - Particulate - total, mg
Can - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter, gr/SCF
Cao - Particulate - total, gr/SCF
Cat - Particulate - probe, cyclone,
and filter,
gr/cf @ stack conditions
AEE-3
0.05
1.00
28.86
28.86
200
29.99
620*
62,640
269,650
333
.500
140*
51.4
73.0
0.0026
0.0036
0.0021
ECE-3
0.50
0.995
28.86
28.81
200
29.99
620*
62.640
269,650
281
.500
153*
32.4
109.1
0.0018
0.0059
0.0021
WCE-3
0.55
0.995
28.86
28.81
200
29.99
620*
62.640
269,650
247
.500
160*
29.4
66.5
0.0017
0.0039
0.0014
AWE-3
0.07
1.00
28.86
28.86
200
29.99
620*
62.640
269,650
292
.500
146*
28.3
73.1
0.0015
0.0040
0.0012
OUTLET
ORSAT
0 2
on 7
£U. /
70 i
*Approximate value.
A-ll
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No.
C - Particulate, total, gr/cf
@ stack cond.
C - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
ax ' .
% EA- % Excess air §
sampling point
AEE-3
0.0029
6.0
8.3
ECE-3
0.0047
4.2
13.6
WCE-3
0.0031
3.9
9.0
AWE-3
0.0032
3.5
9.2
OUTLET
ORSAT
fiinn
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-12
-------
SAMPLE PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
TEST ABD-T
1. Volume.of dry gas sampled at standard conditions - 70°F, 29.92"
Hg, ft3.
17'7 x Vm PB + Pm
\td
17.7 X 97.93 (29.94
'*"" = 95.15
(88 + 460)
2. Volume of water vapor at 70°F and 29.92" Hg, Ft.3
V = 0.0474 X V = ft.3
wgas w
= 0.0474 X 5.7 = 0.27
3. % moisture in stack gas
100 X V
gas = %
'V + V
mstd wgas
100 X 0.27
= 95.15 + 0.27 = °-28
A-13
-------
4. Mole fraction of dry gas
M _ TOO - %M
Md " 100
100-0.28 _
"
5. Average molecular weight of dry stack gas
M W d = (%C02 X ,$) + (%02 X ^) + (%N2 X
(0.9 X ) + (20.4 X ) + (78.7 X ) - 28.96
6. Molecular weight of stack gas
M W = M W d X Md + 18 (1 - Md)
28.96 X .997 + 18 (1-.997) = 28.93
7. Stack velocity @ stack conditions, fpm
_l/2
Average
« 4350 XVAPS X (Ts + 460) p X'M M = fpm
= 4350 X (30.05) (,u ku 1 ,u .... ) 1/2 = 4461.
A-14
-------
8. Stack gas volume @ standard conditions, SCFM (dry)
0.123 X V X A X M , X P
n _ s s d s _ crFM
Qs (T + 460) SCFM
0.123 X 4461 X 19,044 X .997 X 29.68
(300 + 460) •"""
9. Percent isokinetic
1032 X (T + 460) X V
Vs X Tt X Ps X M(j X (D/
= 1032 X (300 + 460) X 95.15
4461 X 140 X 29.68 X .997 X (.1875)2
10. Parti cul ate - probe, cyclone, and filter, gr/SCF
Mf
Can = 0.0154 X if-1 — = gr/scf
on V.—
mstd
= 0.015 X = 0.815
11. Particulate total, gr/SCF
Mt
Cao = 0.0154 X Y~ i- = gr/SCF
mstd
= 0.0154 X = .824
A-15
-------
12. Participate - probe, cyclone and filter,
gr/CF at stack conditions
17.7 X C X P X M ,
r- _ _ an s a
Cat -- (Ts + 460) --
- 17.7 X 0.815 X 29.68 X .997
(300 + 460) ~~ .
13. Particulate - total, gr/CF @ stack conditions
17.7 X C X Pc X M .
C - __ 30 S a ,,,«//-r
Cau -- (Ty '+ 460) -- gr/CF
y
A
- 17.7 X .824 X 29.68 X .997 = n ,-co
(300 + 460) U'ODO
14. Particulate - probe, cyclone filter filter, Ib/hr.
Caw = 0.00857 X Can X Qs = Ib/hr.
= 0.00857 X 0.815 X 406856 = 2842
15. Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
Cav = 0.00857 X C n X (D = Ib/hr.
ax ao s
= 0.00857 X 0.824 X 406856 = 2873
A-16
-------
16. % excess air at sampling point
100 X % 0,
*L FA a - "I
* c (0.266 X % N2)-% 02 /e
- 100 X 20.4 _
(0.266 X 78.7) - 20.4
A-17
-------
I
CO
AMBIENT*
Date
1/17/72
1/18/72
1/20/72
Net Weight
(gin)
0.3512
0.3641
0.3132
Avg. Flow
(cfm)
43
49
47
Volume
(ft3)
10,793
13,377
12,126
Time
(min. )
251
273
258
Concentration Emissions (as is)
yg/m3 gr/ft3 Ibs/hr
1148
961
912
0.000502
0.000420
0.000399
0.280
0.235
0.222
IN BAGHOUSE*
1/17/72
1/18/72
1/20/72
0.4986
0.4532
0.4524
39
35
39
5,148
9,170
9,750
132
262
250
3420
1745
1639
0.001495
0.000763
0.000716
3.53
2.36
2.06
HIGH VOLUME AIR SAMPLES DATA AND RESULTS
*Locations: Ambient Hi Vol suspended 8' above ground level beneath 7B baghouse.
Baghouse Hi Vol located beneath the general position of EPA train WCE, center port
and front sample point (compartment B-14).
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATION - GRAIN LOADINGS
(Ambient 1/17/72)
43 ft3/min. x 251 min. = 10,793 ft3
. 0^3512 = 3>25 x 1Q-5 are x 35>314 x 1(J6 = 1148
ft3 10'793 ft3
x 15.432 = gr/ft3
15.432 = 0.000502 gr/ft3
(Baghouse 1/17/72)
39 ft3/min. x 132 min. = 5,148 ft3
gms = 0.4986 = g>69 x 1Q-5 gms w ,K Q1A v
ft3 -
15.432 = gr/ft3
x 15.432 = 0.001495 gr/ft3
HI VOL SAMPLE CALCULATION - MASS RATES
(Sample # 1 Ambient)
x Vol (acfm) = gr/min.
gr/min. x 1.429 x 10~4 x 60 = Ibs/hr.
0.000502 x 65,150 = 32.71 Ibs/hr
32.71 x 1.429 x 10"4 x 60 = 0.280 Ibs/hr.
(Sample # 1 Baghouse)
Baghouse T_(°R) x gr gr
STD T™ ft3 as is " scf
x Vol (scfm) = gr/min. x 1.429 x 10"4 x 60 = Ibs/hr.
x °-001495 = 0.001805 gr/scf
60
A-19
0.001805 x 228,150 x 1.429 x 10"4 x 60 = 3.53 Ibs/hr.
-------
ASME TEST RESULTS (ASD-1)*
_ 17.7 x 75.4 x 29.97 _ 7. D
Vm ~ ~W " 73'8
mstd
V = -0.94 (at standard conditions)
wgas
%M =0 (% moisture by volume)
Md =1 (mole fraction of dry gas)
MWd = 28.96 (dry molecular weight)
MW = 28.77 (molecular weight)
V = 4413 (stack velocity at stack conditions, fpm) per EPA probe
Qs = 392,069(stack gas volume at standard conditions) per EPA probe
Cao =0.60 (particulate, grains/scf dry)
Cau =0.41 (particulate, grains/scf @ stack conditions)
CauX = 2016 (particulate, Ib/hr)
*Sample taken at inlet duct, trailing EPA sample on 1/19/72, using
velocity at each equal area point as just obtained with EPA pi tot probe.
The above data courtesy of The Union Carbide Corporation.
A-20
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATION - COLLECTION EFFICIENCY (Run #2)
A Baghouse Flow + B Baghouse Flow + C Baghouse Flow = Total Flow In
204,100+216,500+21,900=442,500
8 ™ % of flow' B
442 5oo x 100 = 48.9 (or approximately 49%)
Ib/hr to B Baghouse = total Ib/hr in x TO tallow in
2007 x .489 = 981 Ibs/hr.
Efficiency = 1b/hr t°1h fr°m B x 100
x 10° = 98<6% caPture Efficiency
A-21
-------
APPENDIX B
COMPLETE GASEOUS RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
BAGHOUSE EXHAUST VOLUME RESULTS
Individual inlet duct, scfm
Compartments
Induced Air Velocity, fpm
Induced Air Flow, cfm ambient
Total Exhaust Volume, scfm
1/17/72
1/18/72
1/20/72
MM/12
1/18/72
1/20/72
A
207,200
204,100
--
10
127.4
113,900
321,100
318,000
--
Baghouse
B
163,000
216,500
204,500
8
91.1
65,150
228,150
281 ,650
269,650
C
21,900
21 ,900
--
3
160*
10,000**
31 ,900
31,900
--
*Value of little use due to large areas of plugged grating.
** Estimated from velocity measured and area plugged.
B-l
-------
Sample Calculation - Baghouse Exhaust Volume (B)
Total Air flow area around each compartment (per diagram):
, (2 x 1.5' x 21.5') + (2 x 1.5' x 14') = 106.5 ft2
Effective area = [(grating area x % open) + non grating area] x No. Compartments
= [(85.5 ft2 x 0.80) + 21.0 ft2] x 8
=715.2 ft2
Air Induced = Velocity x area
= 91.1 fpm x 715.2 ft2
= 65,150 cfm
Total Flow, Q = Air entering inlet fan + Air induced
= 204,500 scfm + 65,150 cfm ambient
= 269,650 scfm*
*Assuming Ambient Equivalent To Standard.
B-2
-------
The following 8 pages are chart recordings of the results from the
carbon monoxide measurements made by infrared analyzer at the inlet duct
sampling location (ABD). See notes on each page for explanation.
B-3
-------
w
-------
I
-------
Continued from Preceding Page
I ' I ' l : i i
-------
1.
T
3
4
5!
T
t
I
7!
i I
-------
Continued from Preceding Page
-------
s?
h
10
fe
H
g
n
2
§
o
S
S
a
c
-------
Highest
Level
Measured
193 ppm
-------
u
S
P
^
I
H
o
o
o
8
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location_
Date j- T-O -
Time
Operator
Comments: &
Test
/
*>
3
y
A^ %
(co2)
Reading 1
/. d).
/, o
<9. ?* •'•
0.1
0.1?*
(o2)
Reading 2
c5/J'
^/•7
^-0,7
•20 J
56,a3
(CO)
Reading 3
P / ^ "
;^ /, 7
P 0,9 ' '•
^^).'' . '
0*7*
NCAP-31 (12/67)
B-12
-------
t 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location/^ L±.$Y B
n , *-A
Date /--2-^-
Time
Operator
uej
Comments:
Test
(co2)
Reading 1
(o2)
Reading 2
(CO)
Reading 3
,3
•""' /
' • / .
P-
Z.I..D
NCAP-31^(12/67)
B-13
-------
APPENDIX C
COMPLETE OPERATION RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
FACT SHEET
FURNACE 7 DUST COLLECTOR
ALLOY. WEST VIRGINIA PLANT
FERROALLOYS DIVISION
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
I. Manufacturer
-II. Completion Date
III. Installed Cost
IV. Performance Data
a. Furnace Type
b. Furnace Electrode Arrangement
c. Furnace Power
d. Furnace Product
e. Design Gas Flow
f. Design Gas Temperature @ collector
g. Guaranteed Minimum Collection
Efficiency
h. Fan Power Rating
i. Amount of Collected Fume
V. Physical Data
a. Number of Bags
b. Bag-type
c.
Size
Bag
1) Diameter
2) Length
d. Total Cloth Area
e. Method of Bag Cleaning
f. Total Number of Compartments
g. Number of compartments on-l,ine
h. Number of Bag Houses
i. Size of Bag House
1) Length
2) Width
3) Height
j. Total Weight of Installation
Silos #5 & #7
Emptied #5:
Emptied #7:
Wheelabrator Corporation
May 28, 1971
$3,000,000
Packet electrode
Three-in-line
25 Hz.
Silicon alloys
620,000 actual cu.ft./min.
310°F
Greater than 99.5%
4500 HP, 60 Hz.
12 to 13 tons/day
3744
Fiberglass cloth, graphite-silicone
treated
11-1/2 inches
30-1/2 feet
344,000 square feet, or
7.90 acres
shaking
26
24
3
B
72 ft.-6 inches 58 ft.-O inches
53 ft.-8 inches 53 ft.-8 inches
77 ft.-O inches 77 ft.-O inches
2,100,000 Ibs., or
1,050 tons
58 ft.-O inches
53 ft.-8 inches
77 ft.-O inches
C-l
1/17/72
1/20/72
1/17/72
1/20/72
11:30 A.M.
7:00 P.M.
10:00 P.M.
6:00 P.M.
Dust: 43,400 Ibs
Dust: 68,440 Ibs
-------
APPENDIX D
FIELD DATA
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PI ant
Run No.
Location ~
Dcte v-
Oparator
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJR.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Mo.
t Box No. _
Probe Length
Me
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Proba Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Ola., In.
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
Pi tot
in. F,2°
AP
Orifice AH
in H-,0
Desired
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
Inlet Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Temp.
°F
Impinger
Tsmp
°F
Stcck
Press
in. rig
Stock
Temp
op
. /
0 1
/./ii
in a a.
\ll\H
(,0
. ID
3. it)
*
n •
• ( o > •* »
7 o
('0
m .uu.
. £ *
1 pt
j/'
1.0
±--c- 1 to; AS
,/»
, n
7?
2
/.
Tr
to
V
73L
ya:«*>
. A
J.
V- YJoo
91.
M :
.
I ,eu
s/
^J_
-\—L
>>->+
I ?o
IPO
. * :T i
• 7 o
96
r/
1 .*o\-\ 1.7*
iL
si/
-------
«? •• : jif. '
Point
sit' • '•
Hi -I
i 1-
! ' 3
•S M
^ 2"
i1 (r
r/U-S
L-
•
,
I ;
i
i
Clock
Tir:-,-
la 'o <
A&Vy *
/«/.'/ tf'
«y Ji»
/tf i i.r
j«:sa
w ', iy
/v; wo
••--
T
Mo n/M
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
597. to"^
'to/^C
JeS'i/iC
.1
^
eo.^o
j»< I* ^
I 3. fl Sf
>sT« 9*y
— ~-- - -
*?7.^ 3 ^
.
\
.
-
Pilot
in. H20
AP
a.«/o'>i
2.«70/.U'
1 » 3 *»;./*'
I , baj.ui
) , I il^
1. OT_ ,)''
y , o i^.0/
1 .2.5 '
Orifice AH
in H-,0
Desired
ty ,00
• ^,So
5. to
3 , oo
i tq if
i . I'D
I ,•) C
•
1
•7 1
Actual
. //.a b
0 "k -50
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet j Outlet
95-
1 e>*4
"\ ") >£«> 1 /<"/
V,^TO
. to
. ffi'
, aro
- .-,' . ^
J.q3s
-
IDL
lot.
lot.
J o L
• ''
^S ^
\
V
j
1
? y
9 o
9 °
9 o
f)t^.
9 V-
4l-
--•:••••• • •
?? O ^
X
8
7 i .
PliHIp
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
£.
if
/?5
^35^
JL^
21 JT
^^
1
I
Box
Temp.
«3J
^
ro
^ .
Impinger
- Temp
°r
& o
V
/
Stack
Press
in. Hg
'stf}.6>&
^
/
Stsck
Temp
°F
i
/
, W
1 "^
•-..
1
i
!
Ccitpents:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
-------
Part.'ID-, p. 4 of 8
PARTI CULATE FIELD DATA
I \ VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN,ALL BLANKS
}
PI ant
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No.
Location
Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "H
4/0
//'¥
Operator
Probe Heater Setting . 3"e>
Assumed Moisture %_
Hecter Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In._
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
Orifice AH
in HoO
Dos i red
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet 1 Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Tercp.
°F
Impir.ger
•Tsxp
°r
Stcck
Press
in. rig
Stack
Temp
?>?*
6jL
6,0
, ?•
// : rC
-L~
3FV.
/CO
73-'
, Wo
i .to
f.tf
±
/.&P
1^0
JL±.
±
. f
//.'y-
L14.
JtHf
t.o
a./*
JLSLj-
i .;*
.39-
! i.io
&./*>
SSL
'H.i7
. 10
S'*-
9*-
.92,
J4-.
rt-n iya/f. LQ
i
-------
Point
Clock
Time
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. H£0
Ap
Orifice AH
in hUO
Desired
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
Inlet ! Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Tercp.
Impinger
Temp
°r
Cf.^^1.
JcuvK
Press
in. Ho
Stack
Ten-p
°F
32.30
3-fto
a.
//£•
jeo
f , tfO
13
a. 3s'
96
\
Comments:
.'OP-37'( 12/67)
-------
Part 10, p..4 of 8
Plant
PARTIC%ATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN-ALL 'BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point 577^K *?r
sampling, read and record every S _ 3ti"
minutes. . ~~
Run No.
Location
Dste
SCT.ple Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Prejss. "Hg
Assumed Moisture % *^-
Oparator
Point
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °
Probe Ti'p Dia., In.
Clock
JlKS
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. K20
AP
Orifice
in H
. Dry Gas Tenip.
Desired 1 Actual i Inlet I Outlet
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Temp.
°F
Impinger
°F
Stcck
Press
in. h'g j
Stack
•XJ
_2_
JL
-2-L
TT
),
90
ot' 3.>" ly?V< 37
90
: 30 l//?a . ao. | I.LO
CT 7
£11 oo
v/
68:
±2.
\ )>oO
-4-
J-a-
* t> :t
;.
9?
7
/oo
2TL
, &e j L 0? I J.
/I
*;/
^fc
1 e O
J4-1-
JA7f. ^
/o
/O 0 J
•:»>-
090
-L&1-
/ /
'•**>
/ »
UL±
I ,*0
-JL.L
I* '• *l
J3-
i'ir
±J-
'I L
//;
NJX
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
Vft .
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No.
Location
Date
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. _
Probe Length
J
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Oparator
Probe Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Point
, SfA^^
tr~— |
2-
3
1 u
<£
4
1
Clock
Tin:-
)i; i "
/ / ; / r
l) ! * o
1 1 : a*
ir, 10
V
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
JT^ / H 3. ^
T^^t 11
S"£) , J o
,ST$~i H'fl
//Ms" fl^o i &o
111 V o
•,- & if , a ty
i f,' W f \ ,?(*<» ' 9?
1
\
1
1
r
9J*. yV~
1
j
1
1
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
J?--To
H .%0
At0o
). S~o
1 1 S~o
/. o z-
) . O1-
I.7.U-
i
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired
% ,90
•3, fo
3. 14 o
2 >fo
3 iSo
/. *? o
Actual
1
3.9 a
3»T"0
3. MO
4' jTo
3 • so
J.9f>
j , 9 o j, to
/,^"7
,\
i
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
Outlet
1
i
/tf 6>
y/£
/-*!_
/J^
V A6
7o? V
1 2 y
1 ILJ.
\
1 {
/G o
/ox
/ £>*y
) 0 6
lot.
/ 6 (a
lot*
??*
/
S6
Punip
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
•7
J?
y o
^
/ ^
9
A
Box
Temp.
°F
n? . jT O
Impinger
Temp
°F .
do
/
/
] 1.
/
v'
! I
i
1
1
.
\
/
V
Stack
Press
in. Hg
• -i c*.
1
Stack
Te-p
°F
-j)c,°
f
i
i
/
\h
h
;
V
I
-------
10, p. 4 of 8
Run No.
Location
D£te
-7
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT-- FJLLJN-ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. _
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture % *J
H
Cparator
Probe Heater Sotting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In. ^
Clock
i
N
Dry Gas
Keter, Cf
,- » I
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in HoO
Dry Gas Temp.
or-
r
Desired
Actual i Inlet
Outlet
t. <
/r
Pu^ip
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Tenp.
Ir.pinger
Lff
S*- -.-i,
tuCK
Press
in. Hg
l-lflt
Stack
Ten-.p
°F
: a
Sjt-LSL
M
t >
i •
;.?/
\in:i/t
) . (**
, ii.
So
Lot.
I, *o
3.QO !
* ' \\S-.lQ I
/. r
l . 3
9 X
2UL.
Lift 3?
my
/D
1.34
>/(*
A_UiC_U£LJ
h /_
JJ_
1,00
1.70
/*/
H.
ST4
-------
TW, :
1
1
1
0
co
Po¥^
itf&i
/-- F
•}
">.
I/
A"
J.
-7
. 1
1
'
Clock
Tirr.s
;£:2?
; I, ; •»,!-
/t •>?
/£, ; i/ r
)(*: t/7
/i. '• sv
,' 4 " T "'
; 7 .' c *i
.:„
Dry Gas
Meter, GF
!»<-!*£*
L^l.K
L If 7 , O±
(--JO.LL
/,->ih k<
teTZ, &e>
(.$3* £ y
/D-2.H
'
.
.J
Pitot
in. H20
Ap
^.i/t
p. eo
),-?d
I.-70
y.jro
y . s~*>
I.OO
I,2~J
•
Orifice
in Ho
De-si red "
if, C 0
3,-^
J?.3^
^,ro
4. co
^.;Te
/ . -S o
.
AH
o
Actual
/) . - i.
'J-. 'A rt
<3. S'o
5.««
3- £6
3 > r f
1 .S J
.
A^3
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
? • c
• »3 r
H\
JJtt
IZH
i£ a
tzi
! i-*>
\
n
Temp.
Outlet
/ f, i
/^^
lot
ie»!T
/t9-
? o o
loo
IV
/
66
';
•J
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Giuge
; *
/a.
i^
;<»
Jif
5'j
ai
.
Box
Terr.p.
°F
^?-;o
(
:
'.
^
Impir.ger
Temp
°F
-- &
V
Stock
Press
in. Hn
-•iri.
'
•
^
Stack
Terr.?
op
-i<*7
/
/
..,.
f ,
•
I/
k
' *•
k
1
i
Coinnjents:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Plant AfW
Run No.
Alf£^ '\
Location iSo-a^^t 7^\l\&**+1
t-
K
'
• i
i
Date
Oparato
Point
•*£f/9/
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. (~~E ~"~*~~
Meter Box No. fi^Z - ^
' *7 fa Probe Length ,£>"* '
Ak J L
» 1 DofAJC.
Clock
Itae
•#Wff*
f ?-7
?..'/ ^>
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
/ / o .^7
2-// . ^/ Z-
x^A io * -73, ¥V*5
1
1
r^
j
i
I
1
t
1
1
Probe Heater Setting
Orifice AH
in H-,0
Desired
x\ q
/I
///v-ftj' •
'
60
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Actual Inlet
^, ^
( j(
\J
3' 9
i
/ 'kh
/*2-£^
f 'io
,
ygi.9
N
/
Outlet
1^-0
/ 2- •£*
j/ fl
ifc^m /
US'
Ambient Te
Bar. Press
Assumed Ko
Heater Box
Probe Tip
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
^-
-------
Part 10, p. 4
Plant
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL .BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Box No.
-7-Meter Box No. _
Length
^ T~
O 1 ^—
Ambient Temp "F_
Bar. Press. "Kg
Oparator
Probe Haater Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Ttester Box Setting,
Probe Tip Oia., In._
°F
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
Plant
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN. ALL- BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every, 5
minutes.
Ambient Temp *F
Bar. Press. "Hg
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Prcbs Length
Assumed Moisture 2
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia.. In.
Probe Heater Setting
-------
f Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
-------
PartilO, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. .
Run No.
Sample Box.No. _
Meter Box No. _/*C T ~
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F /
Bar. Press. "Hg 'Z-fr.
Assumed Moisture 2
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Hecter Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Pi a. .In.
-------
, Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant
Run No.
Locati on
Date
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Senipls Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
&X^_
Assumed Moisture %
Opsrator
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In._
Point
Clock
Ti8-.a
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Tercp.
°F
Impinger
Temp
°F
Stcck
Press
in. Hg
Stack
Tersp
op
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL JN..ALL, BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. '
Probe Length /£>
Ambient Temp
Bar. Press. '
Operator
Prc.be Kaater Sotting
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In._
O
Point
7PT
Clock
Tlise
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
inlet 1 Outlet
Pusn?
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Terr.p.
°F
Ircpinger
TsT.p
°F
Stack
Press
in. Hg
StaCk
Ten:p
°F
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single-point
sampling, read and recoro*"every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
Jo
Assumed Moisture %
L
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In.
'it
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of-8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of e
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Ambient Temp °f_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Box No.
Meter Box No. •
Probe Length
Assumed Moisture %
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Probe Heater Setting
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL .BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single po.int
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. .
V'
:Box fio.
Heter Box No. -_
Probe Length
Ambient Te^ip °F
BJr. Press. "K,
Assumed Moisture %
Oparator
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting;
Probe Tip Oia., In._
c
Point
"cio'ck
Titf*
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in H^O
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg.
Gouge
Box
Temp.
°F
Impinger
TCTP
Stcck
Stack *
-------
Par*; 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
Run No.
Location
Date.
^jC
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA •*%:
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN-.ALL_ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
"-3 Sample Box No. t~
Meter Box No. *f
Probs Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
)0
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Hester Box Setting,
Probe Tip DiaV, In._
°
Clock
Point Tin:?
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in.
Orifice AH
in HoO
Dry Gas Temp.
Desired
Actual i Inlet I Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Terr.p.
°F
Irr.pinger
Tsxp
. °F
Stack
Press
in. Hg
Stck
ep
-------
, ,.p. 4 Of $-_.;.-
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
Plant
^C,
VERY IMPORTANT - FJLL_IN .ALL_ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling,, read and record every 5, "
minutes.-
Sample Box No.
Keter Box tNo.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture % O
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired " Actual Inlet I Outlet
Dry Gas Temp.
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Tomp.
°F
Impinger
Temp
°F
Stcck
Press
StaCk
Tenip
°F
^\?i
-
e'y
"-
'// b
. ?.^
ll 0
lib
7-0
-------
filter /— /7- 7
•Run number: ft B P~ f
Operator: _
Sanple box number:
c
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
•1
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: 2
Ambient temperature: -j_
liipinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger p^efilled withfrflp ml
Volume collected — j/> ml
Container No
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
of implnger water _
Impinger water residue
«g
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No
Extra No.
Weight results.
mg
probe and cyclone catch:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No
Extra Mo.
Weight results
jng
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
• i / >f" —"' -•' ' *"/'
Filter number CentaffiieV'hoif*'' Filter nunber Container no.
>v.;
'•-'*/
Filter particul "
weight
^otdl."parti cul ate weight
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Height before test: iM
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
Moisture total
gm
Sample
Method determination:
Analyze for:
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
, V f>
Run number:
Operator: ;..
Sample box number:
_• Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled wi_
Volume collected — .P. Oml
Container No
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction ^
~: of 1mP1n9er water - -/••* "9
Impinger water residue
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
_rog
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No
Extra Mo.
Weight results_
_mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
ntunbcr „ Contai/rer nor
fcr ntuncr „
V}itiLJtiZ--JL8£-~
/a;r/ ir e
\
\ .o.fiti
Container no.
particulate weight
7516/
Filter particulate
weight 2>o8'ir\ mg
t ftter :
Silica Gel
Weight after test^ ° °
Weight before test: /4V/
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
2.
3.
Moisture total II*1- gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments; ' ^,.
Analyze for:
D-22
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:__
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
Volume after sampling 4.00 ml
Impinger prefilled with^ ml
Volume collected o ml
Container No.
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction „_
'of Impinger water .>/
Impinger water residue
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results,
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
J"9
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No,
Extra Mo.
Weight results
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate „
Filter 4vumb€r Container, no. Filter number Container no.
• \ / X .-..rjst-.i.J?l?:7^:>.'. -|- • ~ I /•:. -,-:_ •?• .••• .
1 ' ' 3 Filter particulate
- •/'? 2 '*> . weight 3?7y»£ mg
particulate weight
f"~—— -' \
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: /A f #?, 4
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1. 2.
3.
4.
mg
Moisture total 33. ^ gm
Sample number:_
Method determination:.
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-23
-------
Date: _
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:_
Ambient temperature:
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling
ml Container No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
\F11ter number Ce*4*tner-rro. Filter number Container no.
\ Q^±!' |__ '•
particuTate weight
rtlcula
CPHfrP
mg
1III|J IIIVJCI ffCIIIICU Wl UI>f4>OIIII
Volume collected -c ml
Impintjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
CAtra iiu. _
Container No.^J
Extra No.
Container No._
Extra No.
Container No.^j
Extra Mo.
Impinger water residue SJit
&3
Weight results .2*7
V/eight results
Weight results 4e^«3
..
9 mg
mg
mg
mg
Filter particulate
weigh t W*]\v>Cf mg
** mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Height before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
Moisture total
2.
4.
gm
Sample number:
Method determination:.
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-24
-------
-ff
Date: //S7/7Z.
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
•' Plant:
Run number:
Operator: __
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: ^
Ambient temperature:
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling.
Impinger prefilled witlgfeaa ml
Volume collected — /£ ml
Container No.^ttlM Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No. of 1mP1n9er water _
Impinger water residue 7.0
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Mo.
Weight results_
//.v
jng
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
Filter number
~-f.f&
JF number Container no.
ur '•"
- i
-Tota4-particu1ate weight
Filter particulate
weight /£7 nig
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: _
Height before test: - f /9o.9
Moisture weight collected: _ __
Container number: 1. 2.
4.
Moisture total ^
gm
Sample number:
Method determination:.
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-25
-------
I
Date:
Run number;
Operator: j
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
10 ml
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected -TD ml
Container No,
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger water O-O mg
Impinger water residue
_mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No
Extra No.
Weight results
_mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch: Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Mo.
Weight results
_mg
Filt
Filter number
'and Dry Filter Particulate
b. . F4Hcr number Container no.
•-/ , Ol £ f
- Filter particulate
weight
mg
Tetat" parti cul ate weight
Silica Gel
Weight after test: _
Weight before test: r nil
Moisture weight collected: __
Container number: 1. 2.
4.
mg
Moisture total -
gni
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-26
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
.-' Plant: //.
Sample box number: -• \j I
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature :_i
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling
Implnger prefllled w1thVml
Volume collected •""
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Etr— /
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected
Container
Extra No.
-/ Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger water
Impinger water residue^
mg
mg
Impingers and back half of
. filter, acetone wash:
Container Ho
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
.
Probe, cyclone,
front half of
acetone wash:
flask, and
filter,
Filter Papers and Dry
Filter number Container^no.
tfLQd { fc~? ^IC,^"" ' I
1
1
i
Container \\o.UJ££~/
Extra Mo. Weight results )7» fa
•
Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
weight /&•*
ilotal -particulate weight PCfrf 5t*H
75"W *(&,*
mg
mg
mg
•*^
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: /7% 4
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1
X4-
MoisfuK total -1763-
2.
; Sample number:_
Analyze for:
\
Method determination:
Comments;
Z
. 0-28
2.Z
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant; /) /
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure; e?
Ambient temperature:
/
Impinger
Volume after sampling "3Ok_ml
Impinger prefilled wi
Volume collected
Container
Extra No.
- ~l~ Ether-chloroform extraction
":'of 1mP1n9er water
Impinger water residue
mg
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No >X.fc7 ~Z_
Extrfl No> _ We1ght resu1ts
y 7,
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
V/eight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
Container No.
results
- 7
1
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container* rfe. -Pittermimrber Container no.
OJ~fN ^'c/
Filter particulate^
weight
T^t^-particul/te weight
nig
Silica Gel
Weight after test: _
Height before test: < /$'=>< 4
Moisture weight collected: _
Container number: 1. 2.
Moisture total ~d3»7 cmi
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments ;
Analyze for:
7
D-29
-------
PARTI GULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number:
Operator: ___
///?/??-.
Plant:
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature: __
Impinger
Volume after sampling ___7___m1
Impinger prefilled wi th__4>_D_m1
Volume collected — 2— ml
Container No
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
'of Impinger water _
mg
Impinger water residue
,0 mg
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results
mq
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
; Probe, cyclone, flask, and
j front half of filter,
j acetone wash:
Container No.oJC£'3
Extra No. Weight results
fotat-T)articulate weight
jng
Filter P?P£rs ^ Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Coinfliner''tfro. Filter number Container no.
SuT
u r\?£!
Filter particulate
weight /_f^7 «"g
Silica Gel
Weight after test: _
Weight before test: V77J
Moisture weight collected: _ _
Container number: 1. 2.
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
r /
Run number:
Operator:
/7
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: ^ 9,
Ambient temperature:^
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling /'0% ml
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected
Container No.fcXjt?-/ Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No. ~'of impinger water. *£jng
Impinger water residue
_mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results_
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Mo.
Vleight results
mg
Filter Papers and Dry FilterParticulate
Filter number Container no. XT liter nunrer Container no.
o
particulate
- Filter particulate. Q
wei ght /S'l
Silica Gel
Weight after test: .__
Weight before test: /<£/./
Moisture.v;eight collected:
Container number: 1H 2.
mi
3.
4.
Moisture total -6V*? gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-31
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box number:
~Jk. Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Implnger ... ^^
Volume after sampling 1&vmr Container Noj£C&%_ Ether-chloroform extraction
Impinger prefilled withfe ~''of ™er water
Volume collected
Impinger water residue
_mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
jug
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Ho.
Weight results
nig
Filter Papers \and f\Dry FilterPanticulate
A JdJiJ \J\ \r\ JW'P" bsi' /(fc/VV^
Filter number Cyf|6(Wep no. xTillei1 nurteer Container no.
' o , ii \ 1
- Filter particulate.
weight 2~9'jf mg
'Total -particulate weight
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: f
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
2.
3.
4.
Jdpisture total «.
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:.
D-32
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
1
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Sample box number:
Ambient temperature:
y
Implnger
Volume after sampling
Implnger prefilled wi
Volume collected ... -^H- ml
Container No
No.
K3
Ether-chloroform extraction
of 1mPin9er water - *'7
Implnger water residue ££*/
mg
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results
_mg
Ory probe and cyclone catch:
Container No. —7"
Extra No.
Weight results
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone v;ash:
Container N
Extra f.'o.
Weight results
mg
Filter Papers andjDry Filtcr.Particulatt
Filter number cUiWub. jJrKp nMlSft'' Container no.
O 1% ^ Q I
Totol particulate weiqht
Filter particulate
we i ght Jf, y mg
•* •* t*
f mg
1 Silica Gel
, Weight aftnr test:
Weight before test: /*i%"
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
Sample number: ^__
Method determination:_
Comments;
Moisture tot 1
?.
3.
4.
Analy?o for
D-33
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box number: f-^T '~~
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:_
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Container No,
Ether-chloroform extraction
of impinger water &y nig
Aiiip i nyci y>i c i ii i cu i< i biF^^'w' mi
Volume collected *-^|,ml
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Filter Papers and Dry
Filter number Cort|juo>i» no.
V^^^xl
1
I
[.Alia I1U« ______
Container Mo.ft^C-
Extra No.
Container No. _______
Extra No.
Container No. __££_-
Extra Mo.
Filter .Parti oil ate
/ FilfcVl?urab(S:/vto
1
i • .
Impinger water residue 5^
Weight results /<£»'->
Weight results
Weight results 3/<» i
ntainer no.
weight £"• 1+*
^etal particulate weight JCf~F 37 */
£*^*9^I A
• mg
»
mg
mg
mg
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: ; Y
Moisture weight collected:
Container number:
Moisture total -A&3
2.
3.
4.
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-34
-------
*s*
\ ''•'••'".," PARTICULATE
/ ' * • ' •
Date: ///F/72—
/ * — •»
Run number: fj^e"c^ •
Operator:
Sample box number: G--L — /
I
CLEANUP SHEET
H~*=-
Plant: CSP
Location of sample
Barometric pressure
Ambient temperature
•••'•- ' • • ±1?3L ft '':'.- •'•'.
_^jy-.- _..
/ ?^
~~3^
port: ££fc>-&g£^
^•^-cr
•
•
•
Impinger H£0
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled wit
Volume collected
Q ml
Container No..'
Extra No.
^•2_fther-chloroform extraction ^
"•'of impinger water 3-' mg
Impinger water residue
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
' 2-
Weight results_
_mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
Filter Papers and Dry FiUgr. Paniculate
Filter number bonta-lner no. . ( Hifeei' nuMMr* Container no.
yy
::L'
o, :Jj o <•{
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No .ft^6*:2^
Extra Mo. VJeight results
. . _ . . .
>
/S3»fo mg
- Filter particulate
weight _ & V
:Tetal particulate weight
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture v/eight collected:
Moisture total -
gm
Container number:
Sample number:
Method determination:
1. 2. 3. 4.
Analyze for: .
Comments: •
D-35
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box. number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
•: J>
Impinger
tf If \ ' f\ i*~* *" ^
Volume after sampling Sw / ml Container Nonxte-- j Ether-chloroform extraction
Impinger prefilled with^^ml Extra No. ' of impinger water
Volume collected "~2.fr ml Impinger water residue
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone v/ash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results^
Probe, cycVone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No
Extra Ho.
Weii"; L results
mg
mg
Filter Pape
Filter number
Filter Participate
Container no.
Filter particulate
weight
mg
I&ta^-particu]ate weight
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: > i
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
2.
J&3
3.
Moisture total
Sample number:_
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-36
-V
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Date /-/7-?2
'**
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Con;ments:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
D-37
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
Location
Date
Operator
Clock
Time
I-/*
Point
* 4.
5f
1
4,
\
§.'•
1
-L
z
4
(,.
\
°t
10
C-
1
2.
I
i
1.0
AP, in. H20
Z ,o
>-i
i.l
^f $~
a.v
i-l
/.?
1..0
^..0
-L.O
^t,/
7..Z
7./J-
14
/.^
i I i
l,y
fc|
> - 2_
/..3
Stack
Temp., °F
^^5"
-
Stack
Pres. , In. Hg
// Q^^ |
-"fyy^
tf-&
•
AP x (T+460J*
^P x (T+^GO)*
31 rJ~
v^>/
Jilt- '
Kj 'f-f
&'t\
35.1.1
'
i?. 5: v
3? . S TVr ;
^?-r5 '
> y,y/
•*^-*s
?9.3»'
34 -too
v». r^
?T,-r^
1-2-^2^
.
• i
i,f.V-i_
3^.r5
35.^
s 5 f2-
l'^.**'
14-?^
-J5".t7_
1 IJ.C.T-
a^./o
3«.z-7
.
** /"-.I ~..l -4-.: ~~ ..^1 ..mn.. „«•*• Ci^^fl A-*+* \ / 1 1 -» £^^2* I*
Cori,ments:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
D-38
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
Location
Date / ~ / 7
- 7 Z.
Operator
Clock
Time
/7/5
Point
Av
-*
s
AP, 1n. H20
, 02.
-c^
.i^
.CZ
.*><*
,oZ.
,0/S'
.
• <>•?.&
.02.
.CI*
•0 i.
-£)•£-
Stack
Temp., °F
Z/o
-
Stack
Pres., In ily ^
•flf?S 7
=*P x (T+460J*
^P x (T+4GOr
3-^i
-j.t »
eJff
JM_ '
~t¥~
•sxc
'•<•! i
y.of '
?.<.*. ;
!
>i
>•
.» 1
4.01
*\fl
-II
i, 6»&
£/, a'? i
0,6.^
3.LL
\
r • • • i
•**
- Calculation columns, not Field data
U
Comments:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
D-39
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test / -
Location -/?
Date /
Operator
u
Clock
Time
'
Point
Stack
Temp., °F
Stack
Pres. ,
P x (T+^GOJ*
•« A
x (T+46
>./6
A
2--V
2.2.
31 7*7*1^
5'
/.S
1
'i*
- Calculation columns, ft Field data
•**
Consents:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
"" '
* . ^.r*?
Jv •*;.:•:*•,
D-40
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Test
Location
Date / •
-1
Operator
Clock
Time
Point
Stack
Temp., °F
Stack
Pres. , In. Hg
AP * (T+46nj
(T+4G(
x (T+4GOJ j
23
23 2,3
2Y
21 t\ t.3
/. .
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Comments: <^
N'CAP-29 (12/67)
0-41
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Plant
Test
•**
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Consents: •*&* A <,
NCAP-29 (12/67)
D-42
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Operator
Clock
Time
Point
Jl
Stack
Temp., °F
Stack
Pres., In. Hg
&P x (T+460J
x (T+460}x;
,?
,1 37,3
Z
S
7
l.Y *.
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
Test
Location
Date
Operator
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
•
Clock
Time
Point
Z-
Stack
Temp., °F
Stack
Pres, , In. Hg
V1.3*
AP x (T+46CVJi*
•'AP x (T+46C1)'
/•s'
1,1
)/
J+
•**
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Comments:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
•A*
/O^O
0-44
-------
10
o.
x
x
©,
©
INDUCED AIR DATA
15
11
18
14
COMPARTMENTS MEASURED
1.5'X 14'-
Center line
Full Ope n —I
\
80% Open Mesh
25
24
21
20
X®,'''©;-*
x
©
U-1.5'X 21.5'
x
©
©
1.5' X 14'
MEASUREMENT POIN TS
D-45
-------
Induced Air Anemometer Readings, *Ft.
MEASUREMENT POINT
COMPARTMENT
A 2
^
6
7
10
R11
14
15
18
**C20
21
24
oc
£0
DATE
1/17/72
1/17/72
1/18/72
1/17/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1/18/72
1 /1R/79
1 / 1 O/ / c.
1
208
386
264
300
334
292
246
38
340
276
2
260
352
266
294
250
276
220
188
346
304
9CQ
L.OO
3
314
108
184
??R
341
290
186
54
308
272
528
470
4
290
144
28
182
172
-62
134
206
202
196
* Act
/
L
** Mar
5
118
232
218
393
236
-90
200
0
274
388
ual Mea
Minute
y Areas
6
420
340
190
336
216
-142
134
7
300
316
;uremen
» •
Were R
7
320
151
176
26
174
328
114
-11
232
no
468
; for
nrked.
8
362
192
144
180
190
136
99
22
200
274
•son
J£U
9
330
267
133
343
190
229
120
166
232
340
226
10
364
380
364
362
378
40
178
164
346
362
i
iil
D-46
-------
7
-VA^
1°
4
D-47
-------
?flxx ^
D-48
-------
D-49
-------
D-fO
-------
A IO
I LI
n\
7-721
D-51
-------
-------
D-53
-------
W:
.
D-54
-------
I&/
II&71
p
o
D-55
-------
,
//I&/
-72-
\
-------
o
o
o
(43)
o
o o' o.
D-57
-------
(Lit
'//y/*
-------
D-59
-------
APPENDIX E
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
-------
APPENDIX E-l
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
E-l
-------
15708
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
Subparl E—Standards of Perform-
• ante for Nitric Acid Plants
S 466.50 Applicability and designation
of affected facility.
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to nitric acid plants.
(b) For purposes of J466.11(e), the
entire plant is the affected facility.
| 466.51 Definitions.
As u.ed in this part, all terms not de-
fined herein shall have the meaning given
them in the Act:
(a) "Nitric acid plant" means any
facility producing weak nitric acid by
either the pressure or atmospheric pres-
sure process.
(b) "Weak nitric acid" means acid
which is 50 to 70 percent in strength.
§ 466.52 Standard for nitrogen oxides.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge Into the atmosphere of nitrogen
oxides in the effluent which are:
(a) In excess of 3 Ibs. per ton of acid
produced (1.5 Kgm. per metric ton),
maximum 2-hour, average, expressed as
NO.
(b) A visible ^emission within the
meaning of this part.
§ 466.53 Emission monitoring.
(a) There shall be Installed, cali-
brated, maintained, and operated, in any
nitric acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart, an instrument for con-
tinuously monitoring and recording
emissions of nitrogen oxides.
(b) The Instrument installed and used.
pursuant to this section shall have a
confidence level of at least 95 percent and
be accurate within ±20 percent and shall
be calibrated Jn accordance with the
method(s) prescribed by the manufac-
turer (s) of such instrument; the instru-
ment shall be calibrated at least once
per year unless the manufacturer (s)
specifies or recommends calibration at
shorter intervals, in which case such
specifications or recommendations shall
be followed.
(c) The owner or operator of any
nitric acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall maintain a file of all
measurements required by this subpart
and shall retain the record of any such
measurement for at least 1 year follow-
ing the date of such measurement.
§ 466.54 Test methods and procedures.
(a) The provisions of this section are
applicable to performance tests for deter-
mining emissions of nitrogen oxides from
nitric acid plants.
(b) All performance tests shall be con-
ducted while the affected facility is
operating at or above the acid product
rate for which such facility was designed.
(c) Test methods set forth in the ap-
pendix to this part shall be used as
follows:
(1) For each repetition the NO, con-
centration shall be determined by using
Method 7. The sampling location shall be
selected according to Method 1 and the
sampling point shall be the centroid of
the stack or duct. .The sampling time
shall be 2 hours and four samples shall
be taken during each 2-hour period.
(2) The volumetric flow rate of the
total effluent shall be determined by us-
ing Method 2 and traversing according
to Method 1. Gas analysis shall be per-
formed by Method 3, and moisture con-
tent shall be determined by Method 4.
(d) Acid produced, expressed In tons
per hour of 100 percent weak nitric acid,
'shall be determined during each 2-hour
testing period by suitable flow meters and
shall be confirmed by a material balance
over the production system.
(e) For each repetition, nitrogen ox-
Ides emissions, expressed in Ib./ton of
weak nitric acid, shall be determined by
dividing the emission rate in Ib./hr. by
the acid produced. The emission rate
shall be determined by the equation, lb./
hr.=QxC, where Q=volumetric flow
rate of the effluent in f t.'/nr. at standard
conditions, dry basis, as determined in
accordance with S 466.54 (d) (2), and
C=NO, concentration in Ib./f t.', as deter-
mined in accordance with t 466.54(d) (1),
corrected to standard conditions, dry
basis.
Subpart F—Standards of Perform-
ance for Sulfuric Acid Plants
§ 466.60 Applicability and designation
of affected facility.
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to sulfur acid plants.
(b) For purposes of § 466.11 (e) the en-
tire plant is the affected facility.
§ 466.61 Definitions.
As used in this part, all terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning
given them in the Act:
(a) "Sulfuric acid plant" means any
facility producing sulfuric acid by the
contact process by burning elemental sul-
fur, alkylation acid, hydrogen sulflde,
organic sulfldes and mercaptans, or acid
sludge.
(b) "Acid mist" means sulfur acid mist,
as measured by test methods set forth
in this part.
§ 466.62 Standard for sulfur dioxide.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of sulfur di-
oxide in the effluent in excess of 4 Ibs.
per ton of acid produced (2 kgm. per
metric ton), maximum 2-hour average.
§ 466.63 Standard for acid mist.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of acid mist
in the effluent which is:
(a) In excess of 0.15 lb. per ton of acid
produced (0.075 Kgm. per metric ton),
maximum 2-hour average, expressed as
H,SO..
(b) A visible emission within the
meaning of this part.
§ 466.64 Emission monitoring.
(a) There shall be Installed, calibrated,
maintained, and operated, in any x^f'.xric
acid plant subject to the provisions of
this subpart, an Instrument for continu-
ously monitoring and recording emis-
sions of sulfur dioxide.
(b) The Instrument installed and used
pursuant to this section shall have a con-
fidence level of at least 95 percent and be
accurate within ±20 percent end shall
be calibrated in accordance with the
method (s) prescribed by the manufac-
turer(s) of such instrument, the instru-
ment shall be calibrated at least once per
year unless the manufacturer (s) speci-
fies or recommends calibration at shorter
intervals, in which case such specifica-
tions or recommendations shall be fol-
lowed.
(c) The owner or operator of any sul-
furic acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall maintain a file of
all measurements required by this sub-
part and shall retain the record of any
such measurement for at least 1 year
following the date of such measurement.
§ 466.65 Test methods and procedures.
(a) The provisions of this section are
applicable to performance tests for de-
termining emissions of acid mist and sul-
fur dioxide from sulfuric acid plants.
(b) All performance tests shall be con-
ducted while the affected facility is op-
erating at or above the acid production
rate for which such facility was designed.
(c) Test methods set forth in the
appendix to this part shall be used as
follows:
(1) For each repetition the acid mist
and SOi concentrations shall be deter-
mined by using Method 8 and traversing
according to Method 1. The sampling
time shall be 2 hours, and sampling vol-
ume shall be 40 ft.* corrected to standard
conditions.
(2) The volumetric flow rate of the
total effluent shall be determined by us-
ing Method 2 and traversing according
to Method 1. Gas analysis shall be per-
formed by Method 3. Moisture content
can be considered to be zero.
(d) Acid produced, expressed in tons
per hour of 100 percent sulfuric acid
shall be determined during each 2-hour
testing period by suitable flow meters
and shall be confirmed by a material
balance over the production system.
(e) For each repetition, acid mist and
sulfur dioxide emissions, expressed in
Ib./ton of sulfuric acid shall be deter-
mined by dividing the emission rate in
Ib./hr. by the acid produced. The emis-
sion rate shall be determined by the
equation, lb./hr.=QxC, where Q=volu-
metric flow rate of the effluent in ft.'/hr.
at standard conditions, dry basis, as de-
termined in accordance with 8 466.65(d)
(2), and C=acid mist and SO, concen-
trations in Ib./ft." as determined in ac-
cordance with § 466.65(d)(l), corrected
to standard conditions, dry basis.
APPENDIX—TEST METHODS
METHOD I SAMPIJB AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES
FOB STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. A sampling site and the
number of traverse points are selected to
aid In the extraction of a representative
sample.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
FEDEIAL IEGISTEH, VOL. 36, NO. 15?—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-2
-------
m
i
New Source Performance Standards. This
method la not Intended to apply to gas
streams other than those emitted directly to
the atmosphere without further processing.
2. Procedure.
2.1 Selection of a sampling site and mini-
mum number of traverse points.
2.1.1 Select a sampling site that Is at
least eight stack or duct diameters down-
stream and two diameters upstream from
any flow disturbance such as a bend, expan-
sion, contraction, or risible flame. For a
rectangular cross section, determine an
equivalent diameter from the following
equation:
equivalent diameter=2|
"(length) (width) ~1
length-r-width J
equation 1-1
2.1.2 When the above sampling site cri-
teria can be met, the minimum number of
traverse points Is twelve (12).
2.1 S Borne sampling situations render the
above sampling site criteria Impractical.
When this is the ease, choose a convenient
sampling location and use Figure 1-1 to
determine the minimum number of traverse
points.
2.1.4 To use Figure l-i first measure the
distance from the chosen sampling location
to the nearest upstream and downstream
disturbances. Determine the corresponding
number of traverse points for each distance
from Figure 1-1. Select the higher of the two
numbers of traverse points, or a greater value,
such that for circular stacks the number to
a multiple of four, and for rectangular stacks
the number follows the criteria of section
2.2.2.
2.2 Cross sectional layout and location of
traverse points.
2.2.1 For circular stacks locate the traverse
points on two perpendicular diameters ac-
cording to Figure 1-2 and Table 1-1.
NUMBER OF DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM'
(DISTANCE A)
•FROM POINT OF ANY TYPE OF
DISTURBANCE (BEND. EXPANSION. CONTRACTION, ETC.)
Figure 1-2. Cross section of circular stack showing location of
traverse points on perpendicular diameters.
0
o
•
o
0
......
o
o •
1
o
o
—
o
o
o •
a
5
5
i
Figure 1-3. Cross section of rectangular stack divided Into 12 equal
areas, with traverse points at centroid of each area.
NUtSER OF DUCTDIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM*
(DISTANCE B)
Figure 1-1. Minimum number or traverra t*>lnli.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
cn
-4
s
-------
Table 1-1. Location of traverse points in circular stacks
(Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point)
Traversa
point
number
on a
diameter
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
• 9. '
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Number of
6 8 10
4.4 3.3 2.5
14.7 10.5 8.2
29.5 19.4 14.6
70.5 32.3 22.6
85.3 67.7 34.2
95.6 80.6 65.8
89.5 77.4
96.7 85.4
91.8
97.5
.
.
12
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.5
64.5
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
traverse
14
1.8
5.7
9.9
14.6
20.1
26.9
36.6
63.4
73.1
79.9
85.4
90.1
94.3
98.2
points on a diameter
16
1.6
4.9
8.5
12.5
16.9
22.0
28.3
37.5
62.5
71.7
78.0
83.1
87.5
91.5
95.1
98.4
18
1.4
4.4
7.5
10.9
14.6
18.8
23.6
29.6
38.2
61.8
70.4
76.4
81.2
85.4
89.1
92.5
95.6
98.6
20
1.3
3.9
6.7
9.7
12.9
16.5
20.4
25.0
30.6
38.8
61.2
69.4
75.0
79.6
83.5
87.1
90.3
93.3
96.1
98.7
22
1.1
3.5
6.0
8.7
11.6
14.6
18.0
21.8
26.1
31.5
39.3
60.7
68.5
73.9
78.2
82.0
85.4
88.4
91.3
94.0
96.5
98.9
24
1.1
3.2
5.5
7.9
10.5
13.2
16.1
19.4
23.0
27.2
32.3
39.8
60.2
C7.7
72.8
77.0
80.6
83.9
86.8
89.5
92.1
94.5
96.8
98.9
9.2.2. Tar rectangular stacks divide the
croo« section into as many equal rectangular
area* as traverse points, such that the ratio
of the length to the width of the elemental
area* la between one and two. Locate the tra-
verse points at the centrold of each equal
area according to Figure 1-3.
3. References. Determining Dust Concen-
tration In a Gas Stream. ASME Performance
Test Code #27. New York. 1957.
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co. Los Angeles. Bulletin \.'F-50.
1988.
not be used In the case of nondlrectlonal
now.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Pilot tube—Type 8 (Figure 3-1), or
, equivalent.
2.2 Differential pressure gauge—Inclined
manometer, or equivalent, to measure ve-
locity head to within 10 percent of the mini-
mum valve.
2.3. Temperature gauge—Thermocouples,
bimetallic thermometers, liquid filled sys-
tems, or equivalent, to measure stack tem-
perature to within 1.5 percent of the mini-
mum absolute >tack temperature.
2.4 Pressure gauge—Mercury-Oiled U-tube
manometer, or equivalent, to measure stack
pressure to within 0.1 In. Hg.
2.5 Barometer—To measure atmospheric
pressure to within 0.1 In. Hg.
2.8 Qas analyzer—To analyze gas compo-
sition for determining molecular weight.
2.7 PI tot tube—Standard type, to cali-
brate Type S pltot tube.
3.-Procedure.
3.1 Set up the apparatus as shown In Fig-
ure 2-1. Make sure all connections are tight
and leak free. Measure the velocity head at
t.he traverse points specified by Method 1.
'3.2 Measure the temperature of the stack
/as. If the total temperature variation with
time Is less than 50* F., a point measurement
will sufflce. -Otherwise, conduct a tempera-
ture traverse.
• 3.3 Measure the static pressure In the
•stack.
3.4 Determine the stack gas molecular
weight by gas analysis and appropriate cal-
culation as Indicated In Method 3.
en
»->
O
PIPE COUPLING
TUBING ADAPTER
' Standard Method for Sampling Stacks lor
Paniculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
Standards, Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
METHOD I DETERMINATION OF STACK OAS
VELOCITY (TYPE 8 PITOT TUBE)
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Stack gas velocity Is de-
termined from the gas density and from
measurement of the velocity head using a-
Type S (Stauschelbe or reverse type) pltot
tube.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
New Source Performance Standards. Being a
directional Instrument, a pltot tube should
Figure 2-1. Pilot tube - manometer assembly.
4. Calibration.
4.1 To calibrate the pltot tube, measure
the velocity head at some point In a flowing
gas stream with both a Type S pltot tube and
a standard type pltot tube with known co-
efficient. The velocity of the flowing gaa
stream should be within the normal working
range.
I
o
x'
O
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15711
4.2 Calculate the pltot tub* coefficient
using Equation 3-1.
APt.it equation 2-1
where:
C»,..,=Pltot tube coefficient of Type 6
pltot tube.
C,.u=Pitot tube coefficient at standard
type pltot tube (if unknown, use
0.99).
AP,(4=Veloclty head measured by stand-
ard type pltot tube.
AP,..,=Velocity bead measured by Type S
pltot tube.
4.3 Compare the coefficients of the Type S
pltot tube determined first with one leg and
then the other pointed downstream. Use the
pltot tub* only tf the two coefficients differ
by no more than 0.01.
•f. Calculation*.
Use Equation 2-9 to calculate the stack £>i»
velocity.
V.=K.C
equation 2-2
tthere:
V.-
8 tack gas velocity, feet per second (f.p.B.).
JJJ- (,D.mole_.R)
A,
P.-
M
>/> when these unite
are used.
Pltot tube coefficient, dlraensionless.
Absolut* etack gas temperature, °R.
Veloclty head 01 stack fas, In UiO (see fig. 2-2).
Absolute stack gas pressure, in lip.
Molecular weight of stack gas, Ib./lb.-mole.
PUNT
DATE
RUN N0._
STACK DIAMETER, In..
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, In. Hg._
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK (P.). In. Hg.
9 —
OPERATORS ; .
SCHEMATIC OF STACK
CROSS SECTION
Traverse point
Velocity head,
in. H2O
AVERAGE:
Stack Temperature
Figure 2-2 shows a sample recording sheet
for velocity traverse data. Use the averages In
the last two columns of Figure 2-2 to deter-
mine the average stack gas velocity from
Equation 3-2.
6. References.
Mark, L. 8. Mechanical Engineers' Hand-
book. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York,
1951.
Perry, J. H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1960.
Shlgehara, B. T., W. F. Todd. and W. S.
Smith. Significance of Errors In Stack Sam-
pling Measurements. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association, St. Louis, Mo., June 14-19, 1970.
Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for
Paniculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
standards, Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
Vennard, J. K. Elementary Fluid Mechanics.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1947.
METHOD 3 GAS ANALYSIS FOR CARBON DIOXIDE.
KXCXSS AM, AND DBT MOLECULAR WEIGHT
1. Principle ana applicability.
1.1 Principle. An Integrated or grab gas
sample is extracted from a sampling point
and analyzed for Its components using an
Great analyzer.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards.
3. Apparatus.
2.1 Orab sample (Figure 3-1).
3.1.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Fyrex»
glass, equipped with a filter to remove par -
tlculate matter.
3.1.2 Pump—One-way squeeze bulb, or
equivalent, to transport gas sample to ana-
lyzer.
2.2 Integrated sample (Figure 3-2).
2.2.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex1
glass equipped with a filter to remove par-
ticulate matter.
2.2.2 Air-cooled condenser—To remove
any excess moisture.
3.2.3 Needle valve—To adjust flow rate.
2.2.4 Pump—Leak-free, diaphragm type,
or equivalent, to pull gas.
2.2.5 Bate meter—To measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.035 c.f jn.
2.2.6 Flexible bag—Tedlar,1 or equivalent,
with a capacity of 2 to 3 cu. ft. Leak test the
bag in the laboratory before using.
2.2.7 Pltot tube—Type S, or equivalent.
attached to the probe so that the sampling
flow rate can be regulated proportional to the
stack gas velocity when velocity is varying
with time or a sample traverse is conducted.
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 Orsat analyzer, or equivalent.
3. Procedure.
3.1 Grab sampling.
3.1.1 Set up the equipment as shown in
Figure 3-1. Place the probe in the stack at a
campling point and purge the sampling line.
Figure 2-2. Velocity traverse data.
1 Trade name.
Wo. 159—Ft II 3
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-5
-------
15712
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
PROBE
FLEXIBLE TUBING
ER(G
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
5. References
TO ANALYZER Altshuller, A. P., et al. Storage of Oases
and Vapors In Plastic Bags. Int. J. Air &
Water Pollution. 6:75-81.1963.
Conner. William D., and J. S. Nader Air
Sampling with Plastic Bags. Journal of the
American Industrial Hygiene Association.
25:291-297. May-June 1964. ,
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
METHOD 4-
SQUEEZE BULB
Figure 3-1. Grab-sampling train.
RATE METER
VALVE
AIR-COOLED CONDENSER
PROBE
QUICK-DISCONNECT
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
RIGID CONTAINER'
Figure 3-2. Integrated gas - sampling train.
3.1.2 Draw sample into the analyzer.
3.2 Integrated sampling.
3.2.1 Evacuate the flexible bag. Set up the
equipment as shown In Figure 3-2 with the
bag disconnected. Place the probe In the
stack and purge the sampling line. Connect
the bag, making sure that all connections
are tight and that there are no leaks.
3.2.2 Sample at a rate proportional to the
stack gas velocity.
3.3 Analysis.
3.3.1 Determine the CO2, 02, and CO con-
centrations as soon as possible. Make as many
passes as are necessary to give constant read-
Ings. If more than 10 passes are necessary,
replace the absorbing solution.
3.3.2 For Integrated sampling, repeat the
analysis until three consecutive runs vary
no more than 0.2 percent by volume for e&h
component being analyzed.
4. Calculations.
4.1 Carbon dioxide. Average the three
consecutive runs and report result to the
nearest 0.1 percent CO*.
4.2 Excess air. Use Equation 3-1 to cal-
culate excess air, and average the runs. Re-
port the result to the nearest 0.1 ; rcent
excess air.
where:
%EA=Percent excess air.
%O,=Percent oxygen by volume, dry
basis.
%N.=Percent nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
%CO=Percent carbon monoxide by vol-
ume, dry basts.
0.264= Ratio of oxygen to nitrogen In air
by volume.
4.3 Dry molecular weight. Use Equation
3-2 to calculate dry molecular weight and
average the runs. Report the result to the
nearest tenth.
(%0.)-0.5(%CO)
0.2C4(% N,)-(
equation 3-1
. CO,) +0.32(% O.)
+ 0.28(%N,+ %CO)
Equation 3-J
where:
Ma = Dry molecular weight, lb./lb.-
mole.
% CO, = Percent carbon dioxide by volume,
dry basis.
%O,= Percent oxygen by volume, dry
. basis.
%N.= Percent nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
0.44= Molecular weight of carbon dioxide
divided by 100.
0.32= Molecular weight of oxygen
divided by 100.
0.28= Molecular weight of nitrogen
divided by 100.
-DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE
STACK CASES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Moisture Is removed from
the gas stream, condensed, and determined
gravlmetrically.
. 1.2 Applicability. This method Is appli-
cable for the determination of moisture in
stack gas only when specified by test proce-
dures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards. This method
does not apply when liquid droplets are pres-
ent In the gas stream.*
Other methods such as drying tubes, wet
bulb-dry bulb techniques, and volumetric
condensation techniques may be used sub-
ject to the approval of the Administrator.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Probe—Stainless steel or Pyrex' glass
sufficiently heated to prevent condensation
and equipped with a niter to remove par-
tlculate matter.
2.2 Impingers—Two midget implngers,
each with 30 ml. capacity, or equivalent.
2.3 Ice bath container—To condense
moisture in Implngers.
2.4 Silica gel tube—To protect pump and
dry gas meter!
2.5 Needle valve—To regulate gas flow
r»te.
2.6 Pump—Leak-free, di""*"-""" type, or '
equivalent, to pull gas through train.
2.7 Dry gas meter—To measure to within
. percent of the total sample volume.
2.8 Rotameter—To measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.1 c.f.m.
2.9 Balance—Capable of measuring to the
nearest 0.1 g.
2.10 Barometer—Sufficient to read to
within 0.1 In. Hg.
2.11 Ptfcttube—Type S, or equivalent, at-
tached to probe so that the sampling flow
rate can be regulated proportional to the
stack gas velocity when velocity Is varying
with time or a sample traverse is conducted.
3. Procedure.
3.1 Place about 5 ml. distilled water in
each Imptnger and weigh the implnger and
contents to the nearest 0.1 g. Assemble the
apparatus without the probe as shown In Pig-
•ure 4-1. Leak check by plugging the Inlet to
the first Implnger and drawing a vacuum. In-
sure that flow through the dry gas meter is
\\ess than 1 percent of the sampling rate.
3.2 Connect the probe, and sample at a
constant rate of 0.075 c.f.m. or at a rate pro-
portional to the stack gas velocity not to ex-
ceed 0.075 c.f.m. Continue sampling until the
dry gas meter registers 1 cu. ft. or until visible
liquid droplets are carried over from the first
Impinger to the second. Record temperature,
pressure, and dry gas meter reading as re-
quired by Figure 4-2.
• 3.3 After collecting the sample, weigh the
Impingers and their contents again to the
nearest 0.1 g.
i Trade name.
s If liquid droplets are present in the gas
stream, assume the stream to be saturated,
determine the average stack gas temperature
(Method 1), and use a psychrometrle chart
to obtain an approximation of the moisture
percentage.
FEDERAL REGISTER VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-6
-------
4. Calculation*.
4.1 Volume of water collected.
eqaation 4-1
where:
Vw,=Volume of water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
HEATED PI
FILTER'(GLASS WOOL)
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
Wt=Final weight of implngers and
contents, g.
Wi=Initial • weight of Implngers and
contents, g.
B=Ideal gas constant, 31.83-ln. Hg—
cu. ft./lb. mole-* B.
T.u=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 630* B.
P. u=Pressure at standard conditions,
39.92 In. Hg.
M»=Molecular weight of water, 18
Ib./lb. mole.
ROTAMETER
15713
DRY GAS METER
ICE BATH
LOCATION.
TEST
DATE
OPERATOR.
Figure 4-1. Moisture-sampling train.
COMMENTS
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE.
CLOCK TIME
GAS VOLUME THROUGH
METER, (Vm).
ft3
--
ROTAMETER SETTING,
tl'/min
-
METER TEMPERATURE,
"F
4.2 Gas volume.
V.
/1771 'it \V-P.
V ' in. Hg/ T.
equation 4-2
where
V.,
V.
P.
P.,-
Ti
4.3
=Dry gas volume through meter at
standard conditions, cu. ft.
=Dry gas volume measured by meter,
cu. ft.
=Barometric pressure at the dry gas
meter, in. Hg.
,=Pressure at standard conditions,
29.92-ln. Hg.
=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° B.
=Absolute temperature at meter
(•P.+460),'B.
Moisture content.
B.0=
Y..
V.. + V..
+B.
+<«•«*>
Figure 4-2. Field moisture determination.
equation 4-3
where:
B». = Proportion by volume of water
vapor In the gas stream, dlmen-
sionless.
V.«=Volume of water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
V.«=Dry gas volume through meter
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
B»n=i Approximate volumetric proportion
of water vapor in the gas stream
leaving the Impingers, 0.025.
5. References.
Air Pollution Engineering Manual,
Danlelson, J. A. (ed.). U.S. DHEW, PHS,
National Center for Air Pollution Control.
Cincinnati, Ohio. PHS Publication No.
999-Ap-40.1967.
Devorkin, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Lor Angeles, Calif. November
1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co., LOB Angeles, Calif. Bulletin
WP-50. 1968.
METHOD B. DETERMINATION OP PARTICULATE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Paniculate matter is with-
drawn Isokinetically from the source and its
weight is determined gravlmetrlcally after
removal of uncomblned water.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applica-
ble for the determination of particular
emissions from stationary sources only when
specified by the test procedures for deter-
mining compliance with New Source Per-
formance Standards.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Sampling train. The design specifica-
tions of the paniculate sampling train used
by EPA (Figure 5-1) are described in APTD-
0581. Commercial models of this train are
available.
2.1.1 Nozzle—Stainless steel (316) with
sharp, tapered leading edge.
2.1.2 Probe—Pyrex ' glass with a heating
system capable of maintaining a gas tempera-
ture of 260' P. at 'the exit end during
sampling. When temperature or length
limitations are encountered, 316 stainless
steel, or equivalent, may be used, as approved
by the Administrator.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL, 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY. AUGUST 17, 1971
E-7
-------
15714
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
3.1.3 Pltot tube—Type 8. or equivalent.
attached to probe to monitor stack gai
velocity.
3.1.4 Filter holder—Pyrex» glass with
heating system capable of maintaining any
temperature to a maximum of 225* F.
3.1 £ Imptngere—Four Implngers con-
nected In series with glass ball Joint fittings.
The Orat, third, and fourth Implngers are of
the Qreenburg-Smith design, modified by re-
placing the tip with a 14-Inch ID glass tube
extending to Vi-lnch from the bottom of the
flask. The second Implnger Is of the Green-
burg-Smlth design with the standard Up.
2.1.8 Metering system—Vacuum -gauge,
leak-free pump, thermometers capable of
measuring temperature to within 6* F., dry
gas meter with 2 percent accuracy, and re-
lated equipment, or equivalent, as required
to maintain an isokinetlc sampling rate and
to determine sample volume.
PROBE
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
HEATED AREA FILTER HOLDER THERMOMETER CHECK
•I ^.VALVE
IMPINGERS ICE BATH
BY-PASS.VALVE
VACUUM
LINE
VACUUM
GAUGE
MAIN VALVE
DRY TEST METER
AIR-TIGHT
PUMP
Figure 5-1. Paniculate-sampling train.
2.1.T Barometer—To measure atmospheric
pressure to ±0.1 In. Hg.
2.3 Sample recovery.
3.3.1 Probe brush—At least as long as
probe.
2.2.2 Glas» <»»8h bottles—Two.
2.2.3 Glass sample storage containers.
2.2.4 ursauated cylinder—250 mL
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 Ql «*• weighing dishes.
2.3.2 'Desiccator.
2.3.3 Analytical balance—To measure to
±0.1 mg.
2.3.4 Beakers—250 ml.
•Trade name..
2.3.6 Separatory funnels—500 ml. and
1,000 ml.
3.3.8 Trip balance—300 g. capacity, to
measure to ±0.05 g.
2.3.7 Graduated cylinder—25 ml.
3. Reagents.
3.1 Sampling
3.1.1 Filters—Glass fiber. MSA 1106 BH,
or equivalent, numbered for Identification
and preweighed.
3.1.3 Silica gel—Indicating type, 6 to 1«
mesh, dried at 176* O. (360* F.) for 2 hours.
•3.1.3 Water—Dfilonlzed. distilled.
8.1.4 Crushed ice.
8.2 Sample recovery
3.2.1 Water—Deionlzed, distilled.
3.2.2 Acetone—Reagent grade.
3.3 Analysis
3.3.1 Water—Delonized, distilled.
3.3.2 Chloroform—Reagent grade.
3.3.3 Ethyl ether—Reagent grade.
3.3.4 Deslccant—Drlerite,1 indicating.
4. Procedure.
4.1 Sampling.
4.1.1 After selecting the sampling site and
the minimum number of sampling points,
determine the stack pressure, temperature.
moisture, and range of velocity head.
4.1.2 Preparation of collection train.
Weigh to the nearest gram approximately
200 g. of silica gel. Label a filter of proper
diameter, desiccate* for at least 24 hours
aud weigh to the nearest 0.5 nig. In a room
where the relative humidity is less than
50 percent. Place 100 ml. of water In each of
the first two impingers, leave the third Im-
plnger empty, and place approximately 200
g. of preweighed silica gel in the fourth Im-
plnger. Save a portion of the water for use
as a blank in the sample analysis. Set up the
train without the probe as in Figure 6-1.
Leak check the sampling train at the sam-
pling site by plugging the inlet to the filter
holder and pulling a 15-ln. Hg vacuum. A
," leakage rate not In excess of 0.02 c.f.m. at a
vacuum of 15-ln. Hg Is acceptable. Attach
the probe and adjust the heater to provide a
g&a temperature of about 250* F. at the
probe outlet. Turn on the filter heating sys-
tem. Place crushed ice around the Impingers.
Add more Ice during the run to keep the tem-
perature of the gases leaving the last Im-
plnger at 70* F. or less.
4.1.3 Partlculate train operation. For each
run record the data required on the example
sheet shown in Figure 5-2. Take readings
at each sampling point at least every 5 min-
utes and when significant changes in stack
conditions necessitate additional adjust-
ments in flow rate. To begin sampling, po-
sition the nozzle at the first traverse point
with the tip pointing directly Into the gas
stream. Immediately start the pump and ad-
just the flow to isoklnetlc conditions. Main-
tain Isokinetlc sampling throughout the
sampling period. Nomographs are available
which aid in the rapid adjustment of the
sampling rate without other computations.
APTD-0576 details the procedure for using
ihese nomographs. Turn off the pump at the
conclusion of each run and record the final
readings. Remove the probe and nozzle from
the stack and handle in accordance with the
sample recovery process described In section
4.2.
• Dry using Drierlte* at 70* ±10* F.
KOEIAL REGISTEI, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-8
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15715
PLANT
LOCATION
OPERATOR
DATE
BUN NO.
SAMPLE BOX NQ._
METER BOX N0._
METER AHg
CFACTOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURED
ASSUMED MOISTURE, %_
HEATER BOX SETTING
PROBE LENGTH, in.
NOZZLE DIAMETER, in. _
PROBE HEATER SETTING.
SCHEMATIC OF STACK CROSS SECTION
TRAVERSE POINT
NUMBER
TOTAL
SAMPLING
TIME
(«), mln.
AVERAGE
STATIC .
PRESSURE
(Ps). In. Hg.
STACK
TEMPERATURE
.
'
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
ACROSS
ORIFICE
METER
(AH),
In. H2O
GAS SAMPLE
VOLUME
IVm), ft3
GAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
AT DRV GAS METER
INLET
(TmjJ.'F
Avg.
OUTLET
ITn-out'-*11
Avg,
Av9.
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE,
»F
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE,
"F
\
4.2 Sample recovery. Exercise care in mov-
ing the collection train from the test site to
the sample recovery area to minimize the loss
of collected sample or the gain of extraneous
participate matter. Set aside portions of the
water and acetone used In the sample recov-
ery as blanks for analysis. Place the samples
in containers as follows:
Container No. 1. Remove the filter from its
holder, place in this container, and seal.
Container No. 2. Place loose paniculate
matter and acetone washings from all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces prior to the filter in this
container and seal. Use a razor blade, brush.
or rubber policeman to loosen adhering par-
ticles.
Container No. 3. Measure the volume of
water from the first three implngers and
place the water In this container. Place water
Figure 5-2. Participate field data.
rinsings of all sample-exposed surfaces be-
tween the filter and fourth impinger in this
container prior to sealing.
Container No. 4. Transfer the silica gel
from the fourth Impinger to the original
container and seal. Use a rubber policeman
as an aid in removing silica gel from the
impinger.
Container No. 5. Thoroughly rinse all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces between the filter and
fourth Impinger with acetone, place the
washings In this container, and seal.
4.3 Analysis. Record the data required on
the example sheet shown In Figure 5-3.
Handle each sample container as follows:
Container No. 1. Transfer the filter and any
loose participate matter from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish, dcs-
slcate, and dry to a constant weight. Report
results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 2. Transfer the acetone
washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pres-
sure. Desslcate and dry to a constant weight.
Report results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 3. Extract organic particulate
from the Impinger solution with three 26 ml.
portions of chloroform. Complete the ex-
traction with three 25 ml. portions of ethyl
ether. Combine the ether and chloroform ex-
tracts, transfer to a tared beaker and evapo-
rate at 70* F. until no solvent remains. Des-
sicate, dry to a constant weight, and report
the results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 4. Weigh the spent silica
gel and report to the nearest gram.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-9
-------
15716
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
PIANT_
DATE
BUNNO._
CONTAINER
NUMBER
1
2
3a"
3b*»
5
TOTAL
J - WEIGHT OF PARTICULATE COLLECTED,
mo
FINAL WEIGHT
Z^^^CL
TARE WEIGHT
^>=Denslty of water, l g./mi.
MH,o=Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib./lb.
mole.
R= Ideal gas constant, 21.83 in Hg-cu.
ft./lb. mole-°R.
T,u==Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
PtU= Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions, 29.92 in. Hg.
6.1.4 Total gas volume.
i
equation 5-3
where:
V,.,,, =Total volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions) , cu. ft.
V«i,,d=Volume of gas through dry gas
meter (standard conditions), cu.
ft.
' Vwlttd
proved by the Administrator to calibrate »«,„,,= ¥»{ -rp—
the orifice meter, pilot tube, dry gas meter,
and probe heater.
6. Calculations.
6.1 Sample concentration method.
6.1.1 Average dry gas meter temperature.
See data sheet (Figure 6-2).
6.1.2 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample
volume measured by the dry gas meter to
standard conditions (70* F., 29.92 In. Hg) by
using Equation 5-1.
mi
17'71
/P +^\
\(rt"'+13.6)
A p.,- /
/P 0.AI
JR Vv )( ^
in.Hg^V-;\ P.,,
A
13.6 j
equation 5-1
equation 5-4
where:
c'.=Concentratlon of partlculate matter
In stack gas (Sample Concentra-
tion Method) , gr./s.c.f.
M.= Total amount of partlculate mat-
ter collected, mg.
V,.ul=Total volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions) , cu. ft.
6.2 Ratio of area method.
6.2.1 Stack gas velocity. Collect the neces-
sary data as detailed in Method 2. Correct the
HDiHAL REGISTER, VOL, 34, NO. 159—TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-10
-------
stack gas velocity to standard conditions
(29.92 In. Hg, 530° R.) as follows:
Gi ^*. Bta/1 \ * • f
CD ^ «T> \ /~\7 T> '
I (17'71ra)(¥
1
equation 5-5
where:
V.,,d=Stack gas velocity at standard con-
ditions, ft./sec.
Vi =Stack gas velocity calculated by
Method a. Equation 2-2, ft./sec.
P>=Absolute stack gas pressure. In. Hg.
P.tti=Absolute pressure ait standard oon-
tlons. 29.92 In. Hg.
T
-------
ASME PARTICULATE SAMPLING
The ASME train consists of a stainless steel filter holder containing
a preweighed alundum filter. Its operation, briefly, is as follows:
Sample gases are drawn through a stainless steel nozzle and filter
holder, placed within the stack, into a set of water filled Greenberg-
Smith impingers. Isokinetic sampling rates are not determined during the
test but are precalculated from initial pitot and temperature readings.
Only the material collected by the alundum filter is normally considered
as particulate. Only one ASME train was employed during this survey.
CARBON MONOXIDE SAMPLING
Stack gas is drawn from the stack through a filter, into an MSA Lira*
infrared analyzer. This instrument is mated to a Brush* Chart-strip
recorder which reads out directly. The unit is calibrated on-site with
a zero calibration gas (nitrogen) and a known span gas (252 ppm carbon
monoxide).
HIGH VOLUME AIR SAMPLING
High volume air sampling was conducted using General Metal Works
Model 2000* high volume air samplers. The method has become standard
through years of usage and there is no one single "standard". The method
involves drawing air through an 8" x 10" glass fiber filter. The gas flow
*Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorse-
ment by EPA.
E-12
-------
rate is measured at the beginning and end of each sample, using a calibrated
flow meter. The average flow rate is used, in conjunction with the total
time sampled, to determine the sample volume.
E-13
-------
APPENDIX E-2
CLEANUP AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
ANALYSIS (HIGH VOLUME SAMPLES)
The filters are handled in the same manner as are filters from the
EPA particulate train.
E-14
-------
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY REPORT
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAHPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MG it
ALIQ
-t-
L
0 ,0 /
\±
12.82B9/
.33 if
l
, n /
0, // *f <•
0, $6 11-
,
d.c
.¥•< 63
n
Project No.
01
Collection Date
Analysis Date
^ I 7, .15 /
F-l
-------
SAMPLES
Is:
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE HO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS id
ALIQ
/T5"
, o s
LL
7.--
2.
0,6*1
0 /
l
/SO
o.oy
i
IAJ ^ -
.?/
\AJ t £
o.o/rj
0,
0,61
0.05-5-1
0-01
0,04 3 7
a -
8 ».'.V- / J
.t>l 3
1 6
? O o ' "
'
PC/--
fattff
it
.7277
0.011 1
0.0 I I
ft .00 J
ft.
l3 -3
Q.otfff
Project No.
^
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SA1-1PLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS irj
ALIQ
ttbaf;
IL
/H5P-/
/ 9 (>
LL
33,4 o 32.
3S.9 V/T
\L
3
-------
- ££
SAMPLES
•JJ, V --, -
i
11.
(5
NO.
-
l_
n
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
V
-¥
51. ft
' ?
-'3
3
2 /.I 7 0
53 , i* 3 « 3
o ,
a .
32.1
"
,1114.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
"3W/ 3?
SI,
6 , f ys
•a. «». 7 6 •-"'
33. ^i"/ 3
33.3S33
11. 1 S3?
TOT
.lUt
<»"£
.^'-Tr
0,7ft!!
MS i
ALIQ
SJ.'Jiff
21
.7343
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis Date 7
F-4
,OI 7*
\.Wf
0,
1.1173
ivt,
ff
-------
SAMPLES
UJT: y
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SA1-1PLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
Ob
MG iri
ALIQ
006 0 '?J2
o. 11
13.61 63
O.OIOtf.
6/762
1 /. 7 V 5
S/.7/3
o{> 161
II
0./770
to CIB -3
30. 74??
0.61*1
m.
M
11.3017
O
3;
.61 fl
O.I 17 1
_ ft f y~),
49.17/7
0.1 l
0,/?7
00
X.?isl
o .mo
Project Ro.
Collection Date
Analysis Date
F-5
T
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAIiPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS itj
AUQ
u/r,
/z
/OO
11*397
r
f .
•3 U*?
.M.33
1/1
A
0.01*73
i
0.0 ?. "3 A"
^6 / ^
r).3*>
(5.03 3
O.03 0
(5, 0507
Project No.
-6
Collection Date,
Analysis Date ^
F-6
-------
SAMPLES
cy y.
NO.
IE
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MG id
ALIQ
loi
a 2
o
5
C, 00-
£). 00 1
(5,05-5 /
, a / 5 -3
10
4,0 111
<5, 07
6. £>C
H
U/c. £ - /
^.;
0 ,0>/
77
0,0177
<~f= -3
a.
*7.f«f*
0.00 51
0.0\°l 1
.
E = £-
O
O'.tlLI
£
?7.T6 79
£" C JF -
0 1 , 2-
0,00 1 t>
0.00* 6
a.
.770;
/f
0.03 >
5j ^ c >1
0.011
t
;1
/<.
Ac
?7. 37 t o
t1.oc.7o
//
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysts Date
II. I f 73~ ,
F-7
-------
SAMPLES
CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT,
ALIQ.
MS id
ALIQ
0-
U 1, $*-<*>
6/
lit
D-TL
''
O.ooi t
/4-6D-^
77-4
<3 .
77. W 7
3.003 7
/-#£>
, 9 i •
3.
4?
C 0
a
0.007 /
00 II A
9 .* •?•!
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis Date
v/7:
F-8
-------
SAMPLES
CR
NO.
IL
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
Of
SAMPLE
HEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
0,
0,00^3
0,601 ,003
3,
-3
73
t OO
Sa.
'L
/I0 rffi
0 -0005
6,00 /
3
0.0 <3 -i-
0,00ft
it
[5 '
\o6ti
e.Oo/7
6tt>0is
CjF -
0 ,OC>P.?
^.009-7
f.'f 7Y
aiitt.
g, c e 3 t
.
^JTT
0 ,
, oo
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis Date
F-9
-------
SAMPLES
CR
RO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAl-ffLE
TIT.
ALIQ.
it
MS
ALIQ
xJ
0.
7*. /V*
>-/
0,01 13
o .
lit
/HP-
/fflP-3
O.I I
0,01
,
72.3/52-
•W.3/3
n
Project No
Collection Date
Analysis Date
F-10
-------
^/9 „*- t
SAMPLES
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis Date
F-n
-------
3;/;~. ^
7~£> /XA l»> /7
SAMPLES rr^°Y t IV • (/ C* - ^- •
1 ^ywi
[CR
NO.
L
• a_
y
. '^1
- - -y'
i_
L
L
L
L
L
u
l_
L
l_
Project
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
A-f> r*. \
nb D )
/hR Jl 2-
A-ti n 7
/T6 1/ 1
A-/) r\ L-4
n n D 7
%lz.\
25" . 7
'/ / a • 7
3 g1 / . r
3 /. X
liv.7
3^.6
?l"|.'o
SI,1-]
: No. f^ ^^7
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
^
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
./
MC in
ALIQ
.-
^7
3/.Z
^t
?'/.'(
i
Wf,
*&£H
Collection Date //T ~ /A-/ /7 ?
Analysis Date
yAv>72.
F-T2
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
ICR LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAHPI£
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
II
MS ic(
ALIQ
3Ii
9,0 .
31
L
- 2-
WJ-CE - /
? - 'Z
-'. 3
- 7-
LdL_
V/?-<
2S&A
J. o
V- 7
/./
?.V
3^.V
• 7
:3
e-3
Project No.
Collection
Analysis Date
F-13
-------
APPENDIX G
TEST LOGS
-------
TEST
Date
1/15/72
1/16/72
1/17/72
1/18/72
1/19/72
1/20/72
1045-1735
P.M.
P.M.
1349-1800
1130-1800
1128-1601
A.M.
1500-1730
P.M.
0900-1145
1100-1410
1405-2000
1432-1855
P.M.
P.M.
1725-1735
Acti vi ty
Arrived, located equipment.
Unpacked equipment, placed equipment.
One set particulate samples.
Baghouse inlets velocity determination.
Began induced air measurements.
One set HiVol samples.
One set particulate samples.
One set HiVol samples.
Completed induced air measurements.
Carbon monoxide sampling.
Baghouse inlets velocity determination.
Particulate sample on furnace exhaust
duct.
ASME test on furnace exhaust duct.
One set particulate samples.
One set HiVol samples.
B baghouse inlet velocity check.
Induced air spot checks.
Orsat samples and analysis.
6-1
-------
APPENDIX H
RELATED REPORTS
-------
Related reports covering emissions from reactive metals furnaces,
under this same contract for the Environmental Protection Agency, are
as follows:
Test Number Survey Location
FA-1 Foote Mineral Co.,
Steubenville, Ohio
FA-2 Union Carbide Corp.,
Marietta, Ohio
FA-3 AIRCO Alloys and
Carbide, Niagara Falls,
New York
FA-4 AIRCO, Alloys and
Carbide,
Charleston, S.C.
FA-5 Union Carbide Corp.,
Alloy, W.Va.
Emi ss i on
Control Device
None
Venturi
Scrubber
Baghouse
Electrostatic
Precipitator
Baghouse
Status
Issued August 1971
Issued October 1971
Revised December 1971
Issued November 1971
This report
H-l
-------
APPENDIX I
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
-------
R. N. Allen, P.E., Project Manager
T. E. Eggleston, Industrial Hygienist, Crew Leader
G. B. Patchell, Senior Technician
J. R. Avery, Technician
L. W. Baxley, Technician
W. A. Hernandez, Technician
R. H. Kilburne, Technician
J. R. McReynolds, Technician
1-1
------- |