SN 16544.010
Test Number FA-7
Union Carbide Corporation
Ferroalloys Division
Ashtabula, Ohio
by
T. E. Eggleston/R. N. Allen
June 1972
RESOURCES RESEARCH, INC.
A SUBSIDIARY OF TRW INC.
WESTGATE PARK 7600 COLSHIRE DRIVE McLEAN. VIRGINIA 22101
Contract Number CPA 70-81
-------
SN 16544.010
Test Number
Union Carbide Corporation
Ferroalloys Division
Ashtabula, Ohio
by
T. E. Eggleston/R. N. Allen
June 1972
Resources Research, Inc.
A Subsidiary of TRW Inc.
Westgate Park
7600 Col shire Drive
McLean, Virginia 22101
Contract Number CPA 70-81
-------
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
II. INTRODUCTION 3
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS, Part I 6
SUMMARY OF RESULTS, Part II 14
IV. PROCESS DESCRI-PTION . 20
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS 24
VI. PROCESS OPERATION 30
VII. SAMPLING PROCEDURES 31
VIII. DISCUSSION, Part I . 32
A. Results 32
B. Operating Conditions 34
C. Test Conditions 35
DISCUSSION, Part II 40
A. Results 40
B. Operating Conditions 41
C. Test Conditions 42
IX. APPENDIX 45
A. Complete Particulate Results with
Example Calculations
B. Complete Gaseous Results with
Example Calculations
C. Complete Operation Results
D. Field Data
E. Sampling Procedures
F. Laboratory Report
G. Test Logs
H. Related Reports
I. Project Participants and Titles
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Title
Furnace 20 - Overall Emissions and
Collection Efficiency
Furnace 20 - Summary of Results -
Hood Exhaust
Furnace 20 - Summary of Results -
Tapping Exhaust
Furnace 20 - Summary of Results -
Scrubber Exhaust
Scrubber Water Solids
Furnace 13- Overall Emissions and
Collection Efficiency
Furnace 13 - Summary of Results -
Hood Exhaust
Furnace 13 - Summary of Results -
Tapping Exhaust
Furnace 13 - Summary of Results -
Page
6
8
.11
12
13
14
16
18
19
Scrubber Exhaust
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Title
Block Diagram - Sample Locations
Process Flow Diagram - Furnace 20
Process Flow Diagram - Furnace 13
Furnace 20 - Sample Location Layout
Furnace 20 - Sample Point Locations
Furnace 13 - Sample Location Layout
Furnace 13 - Sample Point Locations
Page
5
21
22
26
27
28
29
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
Source emission tests are being performed on a series of electric
furnace installations, known as reactive metals or ferroalloys, for the
Office of Air Programs, Environmental Protection Agency. This report covers
the tests performed at the Union Carbide Corporation Plant, Ashtabula,
Ohio during the weeks of February 14-25, 1972. The tests at these facil-
ities include grain loading measurements and carbon monoxide determina-
tions.
Emissions for this particular plant were determined for a 50 percent
ferro silicon furnace (#20) and a calcium carbide furnace (#13). These
units have similar collection and abatement equipment with gases being
taken directly from the furnace cover into high pressure drop scrubbers
(#20 , Chemico Venturi; #13, Buffalo Forge). In addition, each furnace is
equipped with a fugitive fume hood located over the furnace, to which is
connected several ducts which carry the gases directly to the atmosphere.
A separate hood and duct system carried tapping fumes directly to the
atmosphere.
In each installation the scrubber exhaust was provided with one port
for sampling. The fugitive fume hood ducts had four ports spaced for
equal area sampling. The tapping exhaust had one port. The circular
scrubber exhaust is 14 inches in diameter. The ducts venting the fugitive
fume hood varies in size, but are all approximately 4 feet x 4 feet. The
-------
tapping exhausts are 52 inch diameter circular ducts. Sample point
locations for both furnaces are shown in Figure 1. Further detailed
diagrams and descriptions are included in Sections IV and V (Process .
Description and Location of Sampling Points).
Three samples were taken at each sampling location. Since no
scrubber inlet sampling points were accessible or satisfactory, water
samples were taken from the scrubber discharges for solids analysis, to
determine collection efficiency.
During these surveys particulate matter was sameled using a standard
EPA train as described in Appendix E-l. Combustion gases were measured
using an Orsat analyzer. Carbon monoxide was determined by using a
continuously indicating infrared analyzer. The overall survey for the two
furnaces included 36 particulate emission runs, 5 Orsat measurements, 7
scrubber water samples, and continuous carbon monoxide measurements at
4 locations for a total period of 4-1/2 hours.
-------
(ATMOSPHERE
ATMOSPHERE
ORES
ELECTRICAL
POWER
CARBON
REDUCING
AGENTS
FLUXES, ETC.
ELECTRODES
0
CHUTES
\
\
CHUTES
/
/ COVER
ELECTRIC ARC
FURNACE
TAPPING EXHA
UST '
0
DUST
COLLECTION
SYSTEM
HOOD
LADLE
0
SAMPLE
LOCATIONS
0
0
WATER
SAMPLE
PRODUCT
MOLDS
(FCE
20, ONLY;
Figure 1. BLOCK DIAGRAM - SAMPLE LOCATIONS
FURNACE NOS. 20 & 13
-------
III. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
(Part I - Furnace No. 20)
Shown below, in Table 1, are the results and averages for testing
emissions from Furnace 20, along with corresponding collection efficiency,
using the complete EPA sample train.
TABLE 1
Overall Summary of Emissions and Collection Efficiency
Date
2/15/72
2/16/72
2/16/72
2/16/72
2/ '17/72
2/17/72
2/17/72
2/17/72
2/17/72
2/18/72
2/17/72
9/17/79
Run No.
One
Two
Three
Four
One
Two
Three
One
Two
Three
One
Tuir>
Location
Hood
Hood
Hood
Hood
Scrubber
Scrubber
Scrubber
Tapping
Tapping
Tapping
Scrubber Water
^rvnhHov Ua-t-oi"
Filterable
Particulate
Ibs/hr
* 86.1
569.2
457.7
136.1
100.9
55.2
89.6
Total Average
Particulate Total
Ibs/hr Ibs/hr.
* 95.7
602.5
516.5
169.1
86.1
11.2
8.29
105.2
76.6
90.7
278.4
01 Q 9
429.4
35.2
90.8**
248.3
Percent
Efficiency
None
88.
None
* Two of three ducts sampled, NOT USED in percent efficiency.
** Tapping normally occurs only for about 15 minutes during each 75-90
minute cycle.
-------
Some rather wide variations in results were experienced. This is felt
to have been the result of several factors, including process operation.
The relatively poor overall performance of the scrubbers is influenced
by two factors. Kerosine is injected in the gas stream prior to the blower
and was thus measured as an emission. The primary reason, however, is the
loss of fumes directly to the atmosphere. The scrubber is 88% efficient on
those fumes that are routed to it, but only 39% of the total furnace fumes/
hour are routed to the control system, thus the overall efficiency is only 34%.
The relatively poor efficiency of the scrubbers includes an emission
of kerosine that is injected into the gas stream prior to the blower. Due
to the loss of fumes directly to the atmosphere, from the hood ducts, the
overall efficiency of the furnace fume collection (excluding tapping) was
only 34.8 percent.
Particulate emission summaries for Furnace 20 are shown in Tables 2
through 4 on the following pages. Table 5 shows the results for total par-
ti cul ate in the scrubber water effluent. Flue gas conditions are included,
and percent particulate matter in the impinger train has been calculated
where possible.
Flue gas conditions appeared stable in the scrubber exhaust, but varied
widely at other locations. Carbon monoxide levels in the south hood duct were
rather variable. The general range was 50-75 ppm, with peaks to 130 ppm.
Fume capture of the hood was estimated to be greater than 95 percent but the
tapping exhaust was only about 75 percent. The reliability of results was
considered to be only fair.
-------
TABLE 2
Furnace 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS North Duct From Fugitive Fume Hood
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
% 02 - Vol % dry
% Excess air & sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
NHE-1
2-15-72
50003
.78
.20
20.60
4409
NA
NA
.0948
.0831
40.6
8.1
.1032
.0905
44.2
NHE-2
2-16-72
51327
.23
.20
20.60
4409
.4231
.3584
186.1
6.1
.4507
.3818
198.3
NHE-3
2-16-72
47977
1.12
.20
20.60
4409
.0543
.0438
22.3
52.9
.1154
.0931
NHE-4
2-16-72
54208
.99
.20
20.60
4409
.0776
.0699
36.0
30.0
.1108
.0998
47.4 151.5
'«. ,
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
-------
TABLE 2 (con't)
Furnace 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Center Duct From Fugitive Fume Hood
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
% 02 - Vol 7o dry
°L Excess air (
-------
TABLE 2 (con't)
Furnace 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS South Hood From Fugitive Fume Hood
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% CO 2 - Vol % dry
7. 02 - Vol % dry
% Excess air & sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
JC
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
SHE-1
2-15-72
48160
.72
.20
20.60
4409
NA
NA
.1102
.0981
45.5
11.6
.1247
.1110
51.5
SHE-2
2-16-72
46570
.75
.20
20.60
4409
«^HWM«H_
-
.5648
.4724
225.4
5.8
.5996
.5015
239.3
SHE- 3
2-16-72
43443
1.29
.20
20.60
4409
W^B«MP^^
.7399
.5760
275.5
1.8
.7537
.5867
SHF-4
2-16-72
45208
1.57
.20
20.60
4409
| B
.1633
.1412
63.3
4.7
.1713
.1481
280.6 J66.4
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
10
-------
TABLE 3
Furnace 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Tapping Exhaust
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7,, Water Vapor - 7, Vol.
7o CO 2 - Vol % dry
7. 02 - Vol 7, dry
7<> Excess air @ sampling point
S02 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
ATE-1
2-17-72
31709
.73
.02
20.50
3195
NA
NA
.3715
.3161
100.9
4.1
.3872
.3295
105.2
ATE- 2
2-17-72
31216
2.72
.02
20.50
3195
.2062
.1693
55.2
28.0
. 2Rfi5
.2353
76.6
ATE- 3
2-18-72
30137
2.83
.02
20.50
3195
.3467
.2806
89.6
1.3
.3512
2ft42
t
qn.7 1
'i
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
11
-------
TABLE 4
Furnace 20 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Scrubber Exhaust
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
% 02 - Vol 7= dry
7» Excess air (? sampling point
SC>2 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
JC
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF (? Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
ASF-1
2-17-72
Ilr736
0
1.5
6.0
25
NA
NA
0.667
0.618
67.09
0.856
0.913
86.1
ASF-?
2-17-72
11,383
2.51
1.5
6.0
25
**
0.088
0.079*
8.58**
0.115
0.119
ASF-3
2-17-72
11,383
2.55
1.5
6.0
25
*#
0.062
0.05§*
6.05**
0.085
0.088 !
11.2 ! 8.25 ,
s
*70°F, 29.92" Hg
**Fliter After Silica Gel Impinger
12
-------
TABLE 5
Solids In Scrubber Water Effluent
Furnace No. 20
Location
North Scrubber
South Scrubber
North Scrubber
South Scrubber
Date
2-17-72
2-17-72
2-17-72
2-17-72
Time
1400-1420
1400-1420
1545-1630
1545-1630
Ibs solids
gallon
1.636 x 10"3
1.308 x 10"^
4.557 x 10"3
5.676 x 10"J
Water
Flow, GPM
422
302
422
302
Ibs solids
hour
41.4
237.0
115.4
102.8
Furnace
Total
278.4*
218.2*
*See Discussion
Furnace No. 13
Location
Scrubber
Scrubber
Scrubber
Date
2-23-72
2-24-72
2-24-72
Time
0900-0950
1015-1105
1525-1615
Ibs solids
gallon
2.632 x 10"2
3.003 x 10"2
2.023 x 10"2
Water
Flow, GPM
450
450
450
Ibs solids
hour
710.6
810.8
546.2
13
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
(Part 2 - Furnace No. 13)
Shown below, in Table 6, are the results and averages of testing
emissions from Furnace 13, along with corresponding collection efficiency,
using the complete EPA sample train.
TABLE 6
Overall Summary of Emissions and Collection Efficiency
Date
Run No.
One
Two
Three
One
Two
Three
One
Two
Three
One
Two
Thyoo
Filterable
Parti cul ate
Location Ibs/hr
Hood * 65.4
Hood 46.5
Hood 49.9
OAIAI L< 1^ A u
Scrubber
Scrubber
Tapping 52.4
Tapping 47.2
Tapping 44.4
Scrubber Water
Scrubber Water
Total Average
Parti cul ate Total Percent
Ibs/hr Ibs/hr. Efficiency
69.0
57.9
68.5
0.577
0.423
0.464
53.6
50.2
45.2
710.6
810.8
KAfi 0
63.2 None
0.488 99.9
49.7** None
689.2
2/24/72
* Three of four ducts sampled, NOT USED in averages.
** Tapping continuously.
14
-------
Fairly wide variations were noted in some of the results but this
was expected due to the configuration of ducts and sample locations. The
efficiency of the scrubber was excellent, but this result was not masked
by kerosine, as with tes.ts on Furnace 20. The overall furnace fume
collection (excluding tapping exhaust) was 91.5 percent.
Particulate emission summaries for Furnace No. 13 are shown in tables
on the following pages. Flue gas conditions are included, and percent
particulate matter in the impinger train has been calculated where
possible. Table 5 shows the results for total particulate in the scrubber
water effluent.
Flue gas conditions were stable in the scrubber exhaust, but were
very erratic and unstable at other locations. Carbon monoxide levels, in
the hood duct measured, were extremely variable across the area of the
traverse. They ranged from 50 ppm, to greater than 500 ppm. The tapping
exhaust was more stable and was generally in the range of 35 ppm, with
occasional peaks to 150 ppm. Fume capture was greater than 95 percent for
the entire system.
15
-------
TABLE 7
Furnace 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Fugitive Fume Hood Ducts (Northeast, Northwest)
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol % dry
% 02 - Vol % dry
7o Excess air (? sampling point
SOy Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF 83
W.2
NWH-3
2-23-72
61761
-.62
1.00
20.70
16197
.0205
.0190
10.8
12.8
.0235
.0219
12.5
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
16
-------
TABLE 7 (con't)
Furnace 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Fugitive Fume Hood Ducts (Southeast, Southwest)
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7. Water Vapor - % Vol.
7o C02 - Vol % dry
7o 02 - Vol 7o dry
7o Excess air (? sampling point
S0« Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
SEH-2
2-23-72
33383
.59
1.00
20.70
16197
Nfl
MA
.0460
.0457
13.2
9.8
.0510
.0506
14.6
SEH-3
2-23-72
31652
.53
1.00
20,70
16197
.0366
.0357
9.9
4.4
.0383
.0373
10.4
SWH-1
2-22-72
67973
.14
1.00
20.70
16197
.0502
.0508
29.2
3.5
.0520
.0526
30.3
SWH-2
2-23-72
64308
.06
1.00
20.70
16197
.0285
.0295
15.7'
35.1
.0439
.0454
, 24.2
SWH-3
2-23-72
60239
.73
1.00
20.70
16197
i . i
.0390
,0389
20.1
43.7
.0693
.0692
35.8
.
.
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
17
-------
TABLE 8
Furnace 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Tapping Exhaust
' 9
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
7o Water Vapor - % Vol.
7. C02 - Vol 7= dry
7, 02 - Vol 7» dry
7. Excess air G? sampling point
SC>2 Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
Jt
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Particulate from impinger train
(% of. total)
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF (? Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
BTE-1
2-23-72
29613
.38
1.00
20.80
1733333
NA
NA
.2066
.1858
52.4
2.2
.2113
.1900
53.6
BTE-2
2-24-72
29011
1.12
1.00
20.80
1733333
.1897
.1660
47.2
6.0
.2018
.1766
50.2
BTE-3
2-24-72
27590
3.75
1.00
20.80
1733333
.1877
.1539
44.4
1.9
.1914
.1569
t
45.2 !
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
18
-------
TABLE 9
Furnace 13 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Scrubber Exhaust
Run Number
Date
Stack Flow Rate - SCFM * dry
% Water Vapor - % Vol.
% C02 - Vol 7, dry
% 02 - Vol % dry
7o Excess air (? sampling point
SO,, Emissions - ppm dry
NO Emissions - ppm dry
X
Particulates
Probe, Cyclone, & Filter Catch
gr/SCF* dry
gr/CF (? Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
Total Catch
gr /SCF * dry
gr /CF @ Stack Conditions
Ibs./hr.
BSE-1
2-23-72
15?5
1.83
1.5
6.0
12.5
.
^MVBH^^_
0.040
0.037
0.533
0.0425
0.0449
0.577
BSE-2
2-24-72
1585
1.28
1.5
6.0
12.5
0.020
0.019
0.266
0.0311
0.0328
0.423
BSE -3
2-24-72
1585
0.98
1.5
6.0
12.5
0.031
0.029
0.413
0.0342
0.0361
}
0.464 j
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg
19
-------
IV. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
\
Ferroalloys and calcium carbide are produced in submerged arc electric
furnaces. The facilities under consideration in this report are semi-closed
furnaces, with covers, hooding and scrubber cleaning systems to reduce the
emission of fumes and dust following collection. Figures 2 and 3 are pro-
cess flow diagrams indicating the actual furnaces under test in this survey.
The electric arc is employed as a concentrated source of heat. Ap-
propriate ores are added to the surface of the furnace through mechanized
equipment and chutes. Additional carbon in the form of coke, wood chips,
etc., is an integral part of the furnace mixes, along with specialized
fluxes, etc. The mix for Furnace 20 is gravity fed from chutes to the
semi-covered furnace through an annular space around the electrodes. There
is no mechanical stoking for this furnace design.
The very high temperatures produced initiate a reaction in the bottom
of the furnaces and form a layer of metal which is tapped at appropriate
times. As the ores and carbonaceous materials gradually settle to the
bottom of the furnace, the heat, in conjunction with a lack of oxygen,
react with the oxide ores in order to remove oxygen and thus produce the
elemental metal. The units under examination in this survey were semi-
closed units where the gases containing carbon monoxide were recovered and
passed through high energy water scrubbing systems. However, some gas
escaped and burned around each of the electrodes.
20
-------
ASM
*Sample Points
Figure 2. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM FURNACE 20 (SIDE VIEW)
-------
rv>
IVJ
NOTE: NEU & SEH hoods have SWH & NWH hoods located
immediately behind them.
*Sample Points
Figure 3. PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM NO. 13 FURNACE (SIDE VIEW)
-------
Furnace 20 is designed for a nominal 40 to 50 megawatt load, and
produces hard cast 50 percent ferro silicon metal using Soderburg type
electrodes. Gases and fumes from normal operation are passed through two
Chemico Venturi scrubbers at pressure drops of 70-80 inches of water.
Fumes missed by this collection system are picked up by a secondary hood,
and passed directly to the atmosphere.
Tapping fumes are collected by a separate hood and exhausted to the
atmosphere. The furnace is tapped for about 15 minutes per cycle of 1 hour-
15 minutes to 1 hour-30 minutes. Molten metal and slag pour into ladles,
and the fumes produced in this operation are drawn off by the separate
tapping exhaust system. The slag is removed from the ladle and disposed
of by various means. Molten product is poured into molds, after which it
is broken into usable sizes.
Furnace 13 is a unit of some 24 megawatt capacity and produces 80-85%
grade calcium carbide using prebaked electrodes. The fume collection
system is similar to that on Furnace 20 except that the scrubber system
is a pair of parallel Buffalo Forge scrubbers, with only one on line, and
one as spare. The tapping operation is continuous and the hood over this
area directs all fumes directly to the atmosphere. The molten product pours
directly into molds, is cooled, and dumped from the molds in an automatic
operation.
23
-------
V. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Sample ports were selected during a presurvey inspection trip, and
approved by the EPA Project Officer. As described below, most locations
were chosen not by normal criteria, but rather because they were the only
possible or usable locations.
Furnace 20
Furnace 20 emission streams included one scrubber exhaust sample
location with a single port, three hood duct sample points having four
ports each, one tapping exhaust duct with a single port, and two water
collection points in the scrubber sump area. The scrubber port was in
the middle of a long straight run of pipe. Due to the high pressure and
high carbon monoxide content in this stack, a sealed port/probe assembly
was constructed. Only one point was sampled.
The three hood ducts were each provided with four ports, spaced
for equal area sampling, with six equal area points sampled per port.
A total of 24 equal areas were sampled per duct. These locations were
the only possible points available, but were located only 1 or 2 equiv-
alent diameters downstream from the hood inlets. There was a long
straight run after the sample points although axial flow fans were only
about ten feet above the test location.
The tapping exhaust stack had one sample port, and twelve equal
area points were sampled. This location was in a short straight section
24
-------
between two approximately 30° bends. Only the scrubber exhaust location
met the normal EPA criteria for sample point location. Water samples were
taken before and after the weir in the scrubber sump area. Figures 4 and 5
show dimensions and details for these locations.
Furnace 13
Furnace 13 emission flows included one scrubber exhaust sample
port, which was essentially identical in location to its counterpart on
Furnace 20. There were four hood duct sample locations each having four
ports, one tapping exhaust location with a single port, and one water
collection location in the scrubber sump area. Each of the hood duct
ports was sampled at six equal area points for a total of 24 equal areas
sampled per duct. Ports were placed in the only usable locations, which
were less than one equivalent diameter from an upstream expansion and/or
bend and only one or two diameters from downstream bends and fans. The
tapping exhaust sample port was located in a straight section between two
approximately 30° bends, both within two stack diameters of the test port.
Water samples were taken after the weir in the sump area. Figures 6 and 7
show the physical conditions at these locations.
25
-------
NORTH
TAPPING
EXHAUST DUCT
ro
/
/
\ \
\ HOOD EXHAUST
V
mt
j^gj.i.lflLan^--
,-,- ->..'.-~±-~Hf^ ff*IW--*"»l* «j
I CHE I , SHE
semi-closed furnace.
_fugitive fume hoods.
3 fugitive fume hood ducts
PLAN VIEW
ASE
O
SCRUBBER
EXHAUST
Figure 4. FURNACE 20 SAMPLE LOCATION LAYOUT
-------
ro
-*£
S '
4 '
3 '
U u u
TOP VIEW
«i"
6
i .
A
5 >
4'
fa
A 8 C. D
o o o o
SHb
A B c P
0 O O O
ABC
0006
NHL,
SIDE VIEW OF FUGITIVE FUME HOOD DUCTS
TOP VIEW - TAPPING EXHAUST
TOP VIEW - SCRUBBER EXHAUST
N
ASE
Figure 5. SAMPLE POINT LOCATIONS NO. 20 FURNACE
-------
NORTH
(BTE j
TAPPING
EXHAUST /
SWH
NWH
\
\
ro
oo
HOOD EXHAUST DUCTS
semi-closed furnace.
BSE
O
SCRUBBER
EXHAUST
fugitive fume hood.
SEH
NEH
4 fugitive fume hood ducts.
Figure 6. FURNACE 13 SAMPLE LOCATION LAYOUT
-------
ro
to
TOP VIEW
£-9.5"
4«
3-
^
i
4'
3 '
2.
I
3S.5
A S C 0
/\ B C J)
0000
N-
XI B C D
0000
NEH
SEH
NttH
SWH
SIDE VIEW = FUGITIVE FUME HOOD DUCTS
TOP VIEW - TAPPING EXHAUST
52" DM
TOP VIEW - SCRUBBER EXHAUST
ASE
BTE
Figure 7. SAMPLE POINT LOCATIONS NO. 13 FURNACE
-------
VI. PROCESS OPERATION
All sampling was carried out while the processes were believed to
be running normally. There were periods with furnace "blows" or minor
process load variations but these are normal conditions and are rapidly
corrected.
Appendix C tabulates the available operating data. There were some
fluctuations in the furnace loads during testing, but these were considered
to be within normal operating conditions. Tapping was conducted as often
as necessary, depending upon the total power input to Furnace 20; and
continuously for Furnace 13.
30
-------
VII. SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Test methods were in accordance with standard methods as published
in the Federal Register. Volume 36, Number 159, Part II, August 17, 1971.
See Appendix E for pertinent sections of this publication.
Deviations from the above methods were as follows.
1. With the exception of the ASE and BSE locations, sample port
locations did not meet location criteria.
(Reason: Used only available locations.)
2. At the ASE location, sample times were 30 minutes or less at a
single point, with no pitot or temperature traverse. For samples
ASE-2 & 3, the filter was placed after the silica gel impinger.
(Reason: The location and equipment available necessitated the
above actions.)
3. Sampling time at the tapping exhausts (ATE & BTE) was approximately
15 minutes.
(Reason: Covered tapping period of one furnace cycle, fumes not
being emitted during remainder of cycle.)
4. Sampling time was reduced to less than 2 hours on all fugitive
fume hood samples except NHE-1, CHE-1 and SHE-1.
(Reason: Necessary to conform to furnace schedule and available
sampling time.)
Carbon monoxide was sampled directly into an MSA Lira Model 200* infra-
red analyzer and results were recorded continuously on a strip chart recorder.
It was impossible to obtain samples of gases and fumes prior to the
scrubbers. Composite samples of water effluent were therefore obtained
from each scrubber, along with inlet water to the system.
*Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
31
-------
VIII. DISCUSSION
(Part I - Furnace No. 20)
A. RESULTS
Collection Efficiency (#20)
If collection efficiency is based upon total emissions from the
furnace (except tapping fumes), the collection efficiency for this unit
is computed to be approximately 35%. The results used to compute this
figure varied widely from point to point, and from sample to sample.
Scrubber efficiency, based only on the scrubber water effluent
solids and the scrubber exhaust samples, is considerably higher, averaging
88%. The true efficiency is probably higher due to two factors. One of
three exhaust samples is significantly higher than the others and raises
the average emission from 9.8 Ibs/hr to 35.2 Ibs/hr. Probably the most
significant factor is that kerosine is introduced into the gas stream as
part of the normal process, and is therefore captured by the sample train
and measured as a particulate emission.
It is conceivable that the blank collected for No. 20 furnace scrubber
is in error. It is unusually high, and the blank from No. 13 furnace
scrubber is considerably lower. If the blank from No. 13 furnace is used,
the solids removal average becomes 493 Ibs/hour, which raises the average
scrubber efficiency to 93 percent.
32
-------
Emissions (#20)
Emissions from the overall process were high due to poor capture of
fumes by the primary cover as shown in Figure 2. This left large amounts
of fumes to be collected by the hood, which exhausted directly to the
atmosphere. The overall fume capture for the furnace, except the tapping
fumes, appeared to be greater than 95 percent at all times.
Sample results of emissions from the scrubber are believed to be
high because of the kerosine injection. The first sample, ASE-1, was
immediately clogging, therefore the regular glass fiber filter was moved
for future scrubber samples. Instead of being placed prior to the impinger
train it was placed after the silica gel impinger. This is probably the
reason for the large drop in particulate results after the initial sample.
Particulate Versus Total Catch (#20)
No inlet gas samples were taken so that the percent condensibles
could be determined at the scrubber location. Three tapping exhaust
samples averaged 11% and ranged from approximately 1% to 28% condensibles.
Percent condensibles in the eleven hood samples ranged from 2% to 53%
and averaged 15%. Because of the configuration of the sampling train the
scrubber exhaust fractions could not be measured separately. An oily
residue in the samples of the fugitive fume escaping from around the
electrodes may explain part of the variation encountered. This material
has not been noticed in any previous sampling of open furnace emissions.
It is postulated that some sort of destructive distillation from incomplete
combustion may be taking place as mix is placed around the electrode open-
ing.
33
-------
Flue Gas Conditions (120)
Flue gas measurements were variable on the hood and tapping exhausts,
but not extremely so.
Gaseous Emissions (#20)
As has been noted in the past, the hood gases had low carbon
dioxide and high oxygen concentrations due to dilution. Results were
indicative only for measurement of system leakage.
Low level carbon monoxide measurements in the hood exhausts were
relatively low with occasional peaks, probably due to normal process
variations.
Gases collected by the cover, and scrubbed by the venturi, however,
were very low in carbon dioxide due to lack of combustion. The carbon
monoxide level was well above the calibrated scale of the Orsat, and
at Furnace 13 was estimated to be approximately 65 percent.
B. OPERATING CONDITIONS
Scrubber System (#20)
During the test period ASE-1 the north scrubber effluent water had
a very low solids content, while water leaving the south scrubber had a
very high solids content. During the test period ASE-2 the solids content
was close to equal. During both tests, however, the average was similar.
This would indicate that some operational variation was involved. With
both gaseous effluents going into the common exhaust stack, this should
34
-------
not be expected to create any problem with results. No ASE-3 samples
were available.
Furnace No. 20
Considerable down time was experienced with this furnace, but no
shutdowns occurred during actual testing. Furnace load varied from
40,000 kw to 52,000 kw during the testing. These load variations were
said to be typical of the operation of this furnace. Although the load
variations, etc. may have been perfectly normal, it is suspected that
the poor duplication of results was largely due to changes in furnace
operation. Sampling locations, and conditions, were far worse at
Furnace 13 but the uniformity of results was much better.
Each sample run on the hood exhausts was carefully scheduled to
include one tapping cycle near the middle of that test period.
C. TEST CONDITIONS
Safety (#20)
Due to the nature of the operation, and the indoor location of the
sampling locations, a potential hazard of carbon monoxide build-up was
present. This condition was monitored both by Union Carbide and RRI
personnel.
The only location to experience levels in excess of 50 ppm CO
(A.C.G.I.H. Threshold Limit Value) was the area of the scrubber sample
port during sampling. This area was blocked off and monitored during
testing, with one man constantly available to assist the operator, if
needed, while he entered the area to take sample readings.
35
-------
At the exhaust hood locations, an automatic hopper-type feed car
was in operation within inches of our equipment at times. It therefore
had to be watched, and special care taken, at all times.
Hood Ducts (#20)
The sample locations did not meet normal minimum EPA requirements.
The ports were only one or two equivalent pipe diameters downstream from
a bend in the duct. No preliminary temperature or velocity, checks could
be made due to the furnace being down prior to the first sample.
Some delay was encountered on sample CHE-1 while waiting for an
experimental sampling device (being demonstrated for EPA) to finish at
the port that was due to be sampled. In addition, all trains were shut
down during the first sample in order to reduce filter plugging. Smaller
nozzles were employed to reduce the sampling rate.
The first set of hood exhaust samples was repeated, after it was
found that a heating element short of some kind had caused a cracked probe
in sample CHE-1.
Tapping Duct (#20)
The tapping hood and ductwork did not appear to capture any more than
75 percent of escaping fumes during the tapping operation. At times, even
less than this was captured.
36
-------
Samples were taken only during tapping, and thus were limited to
about 15 minutes duration. A twelve point traverse, at one minute per
point, was conducted, with the points repeated until the tap was completed.
The sample location was fair in that there was about one stack diameter
upstream, and several diameters downstream, clear of bends or obstructions.
Sampling rates were less than isokinetic during the first test due to too
large a nozzle diameter. The nozzle had been selected on the basis of a
preliminary velocity traverse, and was deliberately on the large side,
to provide maximum sample volume in the short tapping period. Changes
in flue gas conditions occurred so that a smaller nozzle was required,
to achieve isokinetic conditions on subsequent tests.
Scrubber Exhaust (#20)
The scrubber exhaust presented a unique sampling situation. Exhaust
gases contained carbon monoxide concentrations well in excess of 50 percent
under a positive pressure of several pounds per square inch. In addition,
kerosine vapors and droplets were mixed with these fumes.
Sampling was accomplished using a special, glass lined probe, friction-
fitted into a steel plug, and sealed with a special pipe joint sealant.
This assembly was then screwed into a long nipple attached to the exhaust
stack, which was equipped with a gate valve. After sealing the probe, the
gate valve was opened and the probe slipped into the gas stream. The probe
was then attached to a standard sampling train.
After the first run, the filter was moved due to plugging, thus some
particulate was probably trapped in the silica gel. Estimated flue gas
37
-------
volume was used,as supplied by Union Carbide. A long straight section
of stack on both sides of the sample port should have allowed reasonably
good flow patterns for single, center point sampling. This was consid-
ered necessary because, the possibility of CO leaks endangering test
personnel dictated that the probe not be moved any more than necessary.
Scrubber Water (#20)
Scrubber water flow rate data was supplied by Union Carbide. A water
sample was not taken during Run No. 3 due to the non-availability of a
Union Carbide gas man to escort the RRI sampler to the sample location.
Composite water samples were taken in small amounts, at approximately
five minute intervals during samples ASE-1 and 2, from each of the scrubber
sump areas.
Power (#20)
No problems were encountered with lack of sufficient power during
the tests on Furnace 20.
Filter Plugging (#20)
Filter plugging was a problem with the first test run on the hood
exhaust ducts. Trains were shut down early in the run to change nozzles.
The problem was not encountered thereafter. A possible cause was
the oily like substance found in the impinger water (during analysis) of
all the hood exhaust samples. Some were worse than others, but all had
the residue. This oily substance also complicated the analyses, in that
the samples were very difficult to stabilize in weight.
38
-------
The filter in sample ASE-1, scrubber exhaust, plugged almost imme-
diately. The cause was almost assuredly the high kerosine content in the
stack gases which was injected into the blower to keep the vanes from
fouling. The filter was removed as mentioned previously.
Miscellaneous (#20)
Due to lack of an appropriate location for equipment storage and
preparation inside the plant buildings, a large van type truck was rented.
This presented problems due to the cold weather encountered. Even with
space heaters some freezing of liquids was encountered.
Handling of glassware was made difficult because the cold necessitated
wearing gloves much of the time. Breakage was encountered, that was directly
related to the cold working conditions.
One of the source sampling trains presented some minor mechanical
problems in operation, but they were soon overcome.
39
-------
DISCUSSION
(Part 2 - Furnace No. 13)
A. RESULTS
Collection Efficiency (#13)
Basing the collection efficiency on total emissions from the furnace
(except tapping fumes) the efficiency of this unit was computed to be
approximately 92%. Consideration must be given to the % fume that goes to
the scrubber versus the total fumes. 86% of the fumes went to the scrubber.
The actual scrubber, when considered alone, was very effective. The average
calculated efficiency was 99.9%.
Emissions (#13)
Atmospheric emissions from this furnace were considerably lower
than for Furnace 20. Although the power usage was only about half, this
was a completely different product, and this furnace produced slightly more
fumes. However, the cover and scrubber system was removing a greater share
of the total dust load created by the furnace. Based upon emissions and
water effluent solids Furnace 13 was producing a dust load of about 800
Ibs/hr and Furnace 20 was producing about 700 Ibs/hr. No. 20 scrubber
emissions were ignored due to the high kerosine content.
The secondary hood appeared to be catching far less fumes which was
most likely due partly to the charging method and the apparently good cap-
ture by the cover. Overall fume capture, including tapping, was very good.
40
-------
Particul.ate Versus Total Catch (#13)
Results of Furnace 13 emissions were similar to those of Furnace 20,
except that the tapping exhaust was more uniform, ranging from approximately
2% to 6% condensibles.
Flue Gas Conditions (#13)
Temperature and flow measurements on the tapping exhaust were stable
but the velocity profile was variable. The hood exhausts displayed very
wide and erratic changes in velocity and temperature, as explained in the
Test Conditions section.
Gaseous Emissions (#13)
Orsat analysis was essentially the same as Furnace 20. An Orsat
analysis was made of the scrubber exhaust gas to determine the approximate
carbon monoxide content. This was off normal scale, in the range of 65%.
This analysis was used in calculations for both furnaces.
Carbon monoxide gas from this process is either used for heating in
the lime kiln, or burned when emitted to the atmosphere. The carbon monoxide
emissions were low, with occasional peaks, in the tapping exhaust, but were
very erratic and variable in the southeast hood duct. This is explained in
the Test Conditions section of the Discussion.
B. OPERATING CONDITIONS
Scrubber System (#13)
No unusual conditions were observed or recorded.
41
-------
Furnace No. 13
Very little down time was experienced with this furnace, and none
was experienced during actual test periods. Furnace load was 21,500 kw
to 24,000 kw. This was a continuous tap furnace, which would aid in
producing a more uniform operation.
C. TEST CONDITIONS
Safety (#13)
Similar problems concerning carbon monoxide, as those experienced
with Furnace 20, were experienced at this location. In addition, an
overhead crane was operating over the hood and tapping exhaust sample
locations. This required personnel to move each time it passed over.
Dust levels were extremely high in the hood and tapping exhaust
sampling areas, frequently requiring the use of dust respirators.
Exposed electrodes were located within 3-5 feet of two of the hood
exhaust sampling locations. This necessitated extreme care when in the
area, especially when handling the metal jacketed pitobe assemblies.
Union Carbide had a man present at all times while RRI personnel were
working in the operating areas of No. 13 furnace.
Hood Ducts (#13)
The hood duct sampling ports on this furnace were located in the only
available locations. These locations were totally inadequate for good
42
-------
representative sampling in ducts. Serious doubt must be expressed about
the accuracy of these eleven samples in spite of the repeatability achieved.
The reasons given for this doubt are:
1. Many indications point to the uneven flow at these points.
2. Velocities were very erratic.
3. Positive, zero and negative velocities were experienced in close
proximity to each other.
4. Temperatures varied widely from point to point, indicating an
uneven, unmixed gas stream.
5. The carbon monoxide measurements on the southwest hood (Appendix B)
graphically show the eddied, non-uniform nature of the stack gas.
6. In addition, some ports could not be reached due to pipes blocking
access.
Sample ports on the northeast and southeast fugitive fume hood ducts
were on a diagonal, thus requiring a platform of four different heights. The
platforms supplied were very unstable. This, coupled with very close working
quarters, contributed to one probe being broken at the southeast hood loca-
tion and a corresponding loss of sample SEH-1. These conditions, combined
with the safety factors previously mentioned, make these hood locations a
"textbook example" of what sampling locations should not be.
Unfortunately there was no other choice, and, although the representa-
tiveness of the sample may be in some doubt, the reproducibility was much
better than for Furnace 20.
43
-------
Tapping Duct (#13)
The tapping duct location and operation, allowed normal sampling
periods to be used at this location.
Scrubber Exhaust (#13)
The scrubber exhaust on Furnace 13 was identical to the one on
Furnace 20. The only difference in procedure was that RRI personnel
gathered flow data by a readout on the Union Carbide computer during
the tests.
Scrubber Water (#13)
Scrubber water flow was supplied by Union Carbide. RRI personnel
took measurements on the weir during the BSE test series that generally
confirmed the numbers supplied, but the weir was very worn and pitted.
Composite samples were collected as with No. 20 furnace scrubber.
Power (#13)
No problems were encountered with power during the tests on Furnace
13. However, an initial delay was incurred due to non-availability on
the first day of testing.
Filter Plugging (#13)
No unusual conditions were encountered.
Miscellaneous (#13)
The problem of the cold cleanup and preparation area was overcome
at this location by moving the van inside the building and renting an
85,000 BTU heater.
44
-------
IX. APPENDIX
45
-------
APPENDIX A
COMPLETE PARTICULATE RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATION
% EFFICIENCY
#20 FURNACE SCRUBBER
PARTICULATE REMOVED (B) lnn
TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (A & B)
= % REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
248.3 Ib/hr
Ib/hi
+ 35.;
248.3 Ib/hr + 35.2 Ib/hr
X TOO = 87.6%
INPUT ^
PROCESS
FUMES
DUST
SCRUBBER
35.
248.
2
3
Ib/hr.
Ib/hr.
EMISSIONS (A)
A-l
-------
SAMPLE PARTICULATE CALCULATIONS
#20 FURNACE
SHE-1
1. Volume^of dry gas sampled at standard conditions - 70°F, 29.92'
Hg, «3.
17-7 X Vm (PB + Pm \
JUJ = Ft.3 =
mstd(Tm + 460>
17.7 x 78.41 (28.90 +
,
(88.4 + 460)
2. Volume of water vapor at 70°F and 29.92" Hg, Ft.3
= 0.0474 X V = ft.3
gas w
0.0474 X 11.2 =0.53
3. % moisture in stack gas
100 X Vw
%M
100 x 0.53
73.4 + 0.53
A-2
-------
4. Mole fraction of dry gas
M _ 100 - %M
nd T00~
100 - .72
TOO
= 0.993
5. Average molecular weight of dry stack gas
M W d = (%C02 X ,$) + (%02 X
(0.20 x + (20.60 x + (79.20 x = 28.86
6. Molecular weight of stack gas
M W = M W d X Md + 18 (1 - Md)
28.86 x 0.993 + 18(1-0.993) = 28.78
7. Stack velocity @ stack conditions, fpm
AVERAGE
Vs = 4350 XVAPS X (Ts + 460)
4350 x / Average
I Ps X M W I
[28.90 x 28.78J
fpm
= 3687
A-3
-------
8. Stack gas volume @ standard conditions, SCFM
0.123 X V X A X M. X P
ss ds
i^ + TOJJ
0.123 x 3687 x 2112 x .993 x 28.90 _ dft 1fin
(in + 460) 48'160
9. Percent isokinetic
. 1032 X (T + 460) X ^ __
Vs X Tt X Ps X Md X ^V2
1032 x (111 + 460) 73.4 p _ Q70/
3687 x 120 x 28.90 x .993 x (0.1875)^ " y//0
10. Particulate - probe, cyclone, and filter, gr/SCF
Mf
Can = 0.0154 X TT- = gr/scf
»n v_-
mstd
0.0154 x ^ = 0.1102
11. Participate total, gr/SCF
Mt
Can = 0.0154 X T,=- = gr/SCF
SO V
mstd
0.0154 x = 0.1247
A-4
-------
12. Participate - probe, cyclone and filter,
gr/CF at stack conditions
17.7 X Can X Pe X M ,
r _ an s d _
Cat - (T + 460)
17.7 x 0.1102 x 28.90 x .993 _ n nQQ,
(111 + 460) 0>°981
13. Participate - total, gr/CF @ stack conditions
17.7 X Cart X Pc X M.
r 30 S a _ ,,^/rr
Cau (T + 460) - gr/CF
/v
17.7 x 0.1247 x 28.90 x .993 _ n 11in
cm + 460) U-"IU
14. Particulate - probe, cyclone filter filter, Ib/hr.
Caw = 0.00857 X Can X Qs = Ib/hr.
0.00857 x 0.1102 x 48,160 = 45.5
15. Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
C = 0.00857 X C X Q = Ib/hr.
ax ao s
0.00857 x 0.1247 x 48,160 = 51.5
A-5
-------
16. % excess air at sampling point
100 X % 00
t FA = _ - "L
* c (0.266 X % N2)-% 02 " A
100 x 20.60
(0.266 x 79.20)-20.60
A-6
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Scrubber Water Solids - Total Solids Collected
No. 20 North Scrubber
-4 gm!
Sample NSW-1 10.59 x 10 ^ mT sample
less 8.63 x IP"4 mT blank*
-4
1.96 x 10 ml scrubbed from gas
* gms o Ibs . 1 . gal _
1.96 x 10"4 mT x 2.205 x 10" d "gin-x 2.6416 x 10'4 me -
1.96 x 10"4 x 8.347 = 0.001636 Ibs/gailon
422 gallons/minute Average flow**
422 gal/min x 0.001636 Ibs/gal x 60 min/hr = 41.42 Ibs/hour removal
41.42 Ibs/hour + 237.0 Ibs hour (South Scrubber) = 278.42
*Value unusually high and suspect.
**NOTE: Water flow supplied by Union Carbide.
A-7
-------
NAME OF FIRM UNION CARBIDE
LOCATION OF PLANT ASHTABULA #20
TYPE OF PLANT REACTIVE METALS
CONTROL EQUIPMENT SCRUBBER
SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS NORTH HOOD EXHAUST
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED TOTAL PARTICULATE
TIME OF PARTICULATE TEST
RUN NO NHE-1 DATE 2-15-72 BEGIN 1342 END 1702
RUN NO NHE-2 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1100 END 1239
RUN NO NHE-3 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1335 END 1450
RUN NO NHE-4 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1648 END 1803
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN NO. NHE-1 NHE-2 NHE-3 NHE-4
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE 28.90 29.48 29.48 29.48
INCHES HG ABSOLUTE
PM ORIFICE PRESSURE '1.39 L37 1.16 1.40
DROP* INCHES WATER
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS 74.20 56.47 41.36 45.55
SAMPLED AT METER
CONDITIONS* CU. FT.
TM AVERAGE GAS METER 92.9 84.0 . 85.5 88.5
TEMPERATURE* DEG. F
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRY 68.9 54.4 39.7 43.5
GAS SAMPLED AT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
CU.FT.
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED 11.4 2.7 9.5 9.2
ML.* IMPINGERS AND
SILICA GEL
VWGAS VOLUME OF WATER .54 .13 .45 .44
VAPOR COLLECTED.
CU.FT. AT STANDARD
CONDITIONS
PCTM PERCENT MOISTURE .78 .23 L12 .99
IN THE STACK GAS BY
VOLUME
MD MOLE FRACTION OF .992 .998 .989 .990
DRY GAS
PCTC02 PERCENT C02 .20 .20 .20 .20
PCT02 PERCENT 02 20-60 20.60 20.60 20.60
PCTN2 PERCENT N2 79.20 79.20 79.20 79.20
A-8
-------
MWD MOLECULAR WEIGHT
OF DRY STACK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS
DELFS VELOCITY HEAD
OF STACK GAS,
INCHES OF WATER
TS STACK TEMPERATURE*
DEG.F.
DPS X (TS + 460)
PS STACK PRESSURE* IN.
HG. ABSOLUTE
VS STACK VELOCITY AT
STACK CONDITIONS,
FPM
AS STACK AREA* SO.IN.
QS STACK GAS VOLUME AT
STANDARD CONDI TON
*SCFM
TT NET TIME OF TEST*
MIN.
DN SAMPLING NOZZLE
DIAMETER* IN.
PCTI PERCNT ISOKINETIC
MF PARTICULATE - PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER*
MG.
MT PARTI CULATE TOTAL*
MG.
CAN PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER
GR/SCF
CAO PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/SCF
CAT PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER*
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAU PARTI CULATE TOTAL
GR/CF AT STACK COND
28.86 28.86 28.86 28.86
28.77 28.83 28*73 88.75
1.32 1.45 1.34 1.52
117
151
176
110
27.59
28.80
4170
1968
50003
147
1875
67
424.0
461.5
.0948
. 1032
.0831
29.60
29.30 -
4431
1968
51327
96
. 1875
78
1493.4
1590.8
.4231
.4507
.3584
29.01
29.30
4350
1968
47977
72
1875
82
139.9
297.3
.0543
1154
0438
29.36
29.30
4400
1968
54208
72
1875
80
219. 1
312.8
0776
1108
.0699
.0905 .3818 .0931
0998
A-9
-------
CAW PARTICULATE PROBE 40.6 186-1 22.3 36.0
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
LB/HR.
CAX PARTI CULATE TOTAL 44.2 198.3 47.4 51.5
LB/HR.
PCTEA PERCENT EXCESS 4409 4409 4409 4409
AIR AT SAMPLING PT
A-10
-------
NAME OF FIRM UNION CARBIDE
LOCATION OF PLANT ASTABULA #20
TYPE OF PLANT REACTIVE METALS
CONTROL EQUIPMENT SCRUBBER
SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS CENTER HOOD EXHAUST, A TAPPING EXHAUST
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED TOTAL PARTICULATE
TIME OF PARTICULATE TEST
RUN NO ATE-1 DATE 2-17-72 BEGIN 1348 END 1405
RUN NO ATE-2 DATE 2-17-72 BEGIN 1639 END 1655
RUN NO ATE-3 DATE 2-18-72 BEGIN 1014 END 1026
RUN NO CHE-2 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1100 END 1246
RUN NO CHE-3 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1440 END 1557
RUN NO CHE-4 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1655 END 1818
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN NO. ATE-1 ATE-2 ATE-3 CHE-2 CHE-3 CHE-4
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE 29-30 29.30 29.50 29.48 29.48 29.48
INCHES HG ABSOLUTE
PM ORIFICE PRESSURE .88 .79 2.11 1.12 L07 1.16
DROP* INCHES WATER
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS 7.32 6.94 8.88 46.40 32.75 36.97
SAMPLED AT METER
CONDITIONS* CU.FT.
TM AVERAGE GAS METER 73.2 85.0 79.6 90.3 96.7 91.8
TEMPERATURE* DEG. F
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRY 7.1 6.6 8.6 44.1 30.8 35.1
GAS SAMPLED AT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
CU.FT.
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED LI 3.9 5.3 8-8 11.4 16.0
ML.* IMPINGERS AND
SILICA GEL
VWGAS VOLUME OF WATER .05 .18 .25 42 .54 .76
VAPOR COLLECTED.
CU.FT. AT STANDARD
CONDITIONS
PCTM PERCENT MOISTURE .73 2.72 2-83 .94 1.73 2.12
IN THE STACK GAS BY ^-11
VOLUME
-------
MD MOLE FRACTION OF
DRY GAS
PCTC02 PERCENT CO2
PCT02 PERCENT 02
PCTN2 PERCENT N2
MWD MOLECULAR WEIGHT
OF DRY STACK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS
DELPS VELOCITY HEAD
OF STACK GAS*
INCHES OF WATER
TS STACK TEMPERATURE,
DEG.F.
DPS X CTS + 460)
PS STACK PRESSURE* IN.
HG. ABSOLUTE
VS STACK VELOCITY AT
STACK CONDITIONS,
FPM
AS STACK AREA* SQ.IN.
993
i20.
48
145
.973
20
.972
20
>991
20
.983
20
.48
154
.46
167
89
117
.86
140
.979
.20
20.50 20.50 20.50 20-60 20.60 20.60
79.48 79.48 79.48 79.20 79.20 79.20
28.82 28.82 28.82 28.86 28.86 28*86
28.74 28.53 28.52 28.75 28.67 28.63
.93
109
16.84 17.12 16.83 22.55 22.47 22.83
29.30 29.30 29.50 29.48 29.60 29.48
2525 2575 2523 3369 3356 3419
2124 2124 2124 2601 2601 2601
OS STACK GAS VOLUME AT 31709 31216 30137 54566 52086 55521
STANDARD CONDI TON
*SCFM
TT NET TIME OF TEST*
MIN.
DN SAMPLING NOZZLE
DIAMETER* IN.
PCTI PERCNT ISOKINETIC
17
57
16
102
A-12
12
96
103
79
72
77
72
.2500 .1875 .2500 .1875 .1875 .1875
82
-------
MF PARTICULATE - PROBE 172.1 88.6 194.5 966.3 716.2 176.2
CYCLONE AND FILTER*
MG.
MT PARTICULATE TOTAL*
MG.
CAN PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER
GR/SCF
CAO PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/SCF
CAT PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAU PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAW PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
LB/HR.
CAX PARTICULATE TOTAL
LB/HR.
PCTEA PERCENT EXCESS
AIR AT SAMPLING PT
179.4 123.1 197.0 1010.0 844.0 244.9
.3715 .2062 .3467 .3373 .3583 .0774
.3872 .2865 .3512 -3525 .4223 .1076
3161 .1693 .2806 .3022 .3077 .0695
.3295 .2353 .2842 .3159 .3626 .0966
100.9 55.2 89.6 157.7 159.9 36.8
105.2 76.6 90.7 164.9 188.5 51.2
3195 3195 3195 4409 4409 4409
A-13
-------
NAME OF FIRM UNION CARBIDE
LOCATION OF PLANT -- ASHTABULA #20
TYPE OF PLANT REACTIVE METALS
CONTROL EQUIPMENT SCRUBBER
SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS SOUTH HOOD EXHAUST
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED TOTAL PARTICULATE
TIME OF PARTICULATE TEST
RUN NO SHE-1 DATE 2-15-72 BEGIN 1350 END 1712
RUN NO SHE-2 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1055 END 1309
RUN NO SHE-3 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1442 END 1605
RUN NO SHE-4 DATE 2-16-72 BEGIN 1657 END 1816
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN NO. SHE-1 SHE-2 SHE-3 SHE-4
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE 28.90 29.48 29'. 48 29.48
INCHES HG ABSOLUTE
PM ORIFICE PRESSURE 1.51 1.12 .99 1.14
DROP* INCHES WATER
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS 78.41 59.40 39.85 41.51
SAMPLED AT METER
CONDITIONS* CU.FT.
TM AVERAGE GAS METER 88.4 77.3 77.8 76.2
TEMPERATURE, DEG. F
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRY 73.4 57.8 38.8 40.5
GAS SAMPLED AT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
CU.FT.
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED 11.2 9.2 10.7 13.6
ML.* IMPINGERS AND
SILICA GEL
VWGAS VOLUME OF WATER .53 .44 .51 .64
VAPOR COLLECTED.
CU.FT. AT STANDARD
CONDITIONS
PCTM PERCENT MOISTURE .72 .75 L29 1.57
IN THE STACK GAS BY
VOLUME
MD MOLE FRACTION OF .993 .993 .987 .984
DRY GAS
PCTC02 PERCENT C02 .20 .20 .20 .20
PCT02 PERCENT 02 20.60 20.60 20.60 20-60
PCTN2 PERCENT N2 79.20 79-20 79.20 79*20
MWD MOLECULAR WEIGHT 28.86 28-86 28*86 28»86
OF DRY STACK GAS ...
-------
MW MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS
DELPS VELOCITY HEAD
OF STACK GAS*
INCHES OF WATER
TS STACK TEMPERATURE,
DEG.F.
DPS X (TS + 460)
PS STACK PRESSURE* IN.
HG. ABSOLUTE
VS STACK VELOCITY AT
STACK CONDITIONS,
FPM
AS STACK AREA, SQ.IN.
QS STACK GAS VOLUME AT
STANDARD CONDI TON
*SCFM
TT NET TIME OF TEST,
MIN.
DN SAMPLING NOZZLE
DIAMETER, IN.
PCTI PERCNT ISOKINETIC
MF PARTICIPATE - PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
MG.
MT PARTICULATE TOTAL,
MG.
CAN PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER
GR/SCF
CAO PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/SCF
CAT PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAU PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAW PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
LB/HR.
CAX PARTICULATE TOTAL
LB/HR.
PCTEA PERCENT EXCESS
AIR AT SAMPLING PT
28.78 28.77 28.72 28.69
1.06 1.05
111
159
.99
202
24.44 25.40 25.43
28.90 29.48 29.48
2112 2112 2112
48160 46570 43443
120
96
72
.1875 .1875 .1875
97 99 95
525.4 2121*5 1862.3
594.6 2252*2 1896.9
.1102 .5648 .7399
.1247 .5996 .7537
.0981 .4724 .5760
.1110 .5015 .5867
45.5 225.4 275.5
51.5 239.3 280.6
4409 4409 4409
A-15
.97
134
23.82
29.48
3687 3794 3803 3563
2112
45208
72
. 1875
95
429.6
450.7
. 1633
. 1713
. 1412
1481
63.3
66.4
4409
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test No. ASE
No. Runs
Name of Firm Union Carbide
Location of Plant Ashtabula #20
Type of Plant
Reactive Metals
Control Equipment Scrubber
Sampling Point Locations Scrubber Exhaust
Pollutants Sampled Total Parti GUI ate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No. ASE-1
Run No. ASE-2
Run No. ASE-3
Run No.
Date 2-17-72
Date 2-17-72
Begin 1406
Begin 1543
Date 2-17-72
Date
Begin 1637
Begin
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
End 1410
End 1606
End 1707
End
Run No.
P, "barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
P ' orifice pressure drop, "HpO
V volume of dry gas sampled @ meter
conditions, ft.3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled §
std. Standard Conditions, ft. 3
V Total HgO collected, ml., Impingers
& Silica Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
Wgas ft.3 @ Standard Conditions*
ASE-1
29.30
1.5
1.73
52
1.76
-1.2
-0.057
ASE-2
29.30
1.5
14.08
63
14.01
7.5
0.36
ASE-3
29.30
1.5
18.74
71
18.37
10.2
0.48
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-16
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
Run No.
7M-7, Moisture in the stark gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
7. C02
% Oo
7. No
M W
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No.
C - Particulate, total, gr/cf
§ stack cond.
C - Particulate, probe, cyclone, .
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
ax '
% EA- % Excess air §
sampling point
ASF-1
0.913
67.09
86.1
ASF-2
0.119
8.58
11.2
ASF -3
0.088
6.05
8.29
______
Orsat
12.5
70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-18
-------
NAME 0F FIRM UNI0N CARBIDE
L0CATI0N 0F PLANT -- ASHTABULA #13
TYPE 0F PLANT REACTIVE METALS
C0NTR0L EQUIPMENT SCRUBBER
SAMPLING P0INT L0CATI0NS N0RTH WEST H00D, N0RTH EAST H00D
P0LLUTANTS SAMPLED T0TAL PARTICULATE
TIME 0F PARTICULATE TEST
RUN N0 NEH-1 DATE 2-22-72 BEGIN 1413 END 1533
RUN N0 NEH-2 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 859 END 1020
RUN N0 NEH-3 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 1218 END 1339
RUN N0 NWH-1 DATE 2-22-72 BEGIN 1412 END 1533
RUN N0 NWH-2 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 854 END 1012
RUN N0 NWH-3 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 1218 END 1336
PARTICULATE EMI SSI0N DATA
RUN N0. NEH-1 NEH-2 NEH-3 NWH-1 NWH-2 NWH-3
PB BAR0METRIC PRESSURE 30.00 29.68 29.68 30.00 29.68 29.68
INCHES HG ABS0LUTE
PM 0RIFICE PRESSURE 1.00 LOO 1.00 2.12 1.94 1.96
DR0P, INCHES WATER
VM V0LUME 0F DRY GAS 39.61 39.78 41.19 53.93 52-02 53.86
SAMPLED AT METER
C0NDITI0NS* CU.FT.
TM AVERAGE GAS METER 73.5 67.9 71.3 79.1 79.2 80.7
TEMPERATURE* DEG. F
VMSTD V0LUME 0F DRY 39.5 39.7 40.8 53.4 50.9 52.6
GAS SAMPLED AT
STANDARD C0NDITI0NS
CU.FT.
VW T0TAL H20 C0LLECTED 2.6 4.4 9.2 4.2 2.0 6.9
ML.* IMPINGERS AND
SILICA GEL
VWGAS V0LUME 0F WATER .12 .21 .44 .20 .09 .33
VAP0R C0LLECTED.
CU.FT. AT STANDARD
C0NDITI0NS
PCTM PERCENT M0ISTURE .31 .52 1.06 .37 .19 .62
IN THE STACK GAS BY
VOLUME
MD M0LE FRACTI0N 0F .997 .995 .989 .996 .998 .994
DRY GAS A_19
-------
PCTC02 PERCENT C02
PCT02 PERCENT 02
PCTN2 PERCENT N2
MWD M0LECULAR WEIGHT
0F DRY STACK GAS
MW M3LECULAR WEIGHT 0F
STACK GAS
DELPS VEL0CITY HEAD
0F STACK GAS*
INCHES 0F WATER
TS STACK TEMPERATURE,
DEG.F.
DPS X CTS + 460)
PS STACK PRESSURE, IN.
HG. ABSOLUTE
VS STACK VEL0CITY AT
STACK C0NDITI0NS,
FPM
AS STACK AREA, SQ.IN.
QS STACK GAS V0LUME AT
STANDARD C0NDIT0N
*SCFM
TT NET TIME 0F TEST,
MIN.
DN SAMPLING N0ZZLE
DIAMETER, IN.
1.00
20.70
78.30
28.99
1 .00
20.70
78.30
28.99
1.00
20.70
78.30
28.99
1.00
20.70
78.30
28.99
1 .00
20.70
78.30
28.99
1 .00
20.70
78.30
28.99
28.95 28.93 28.87 28.95 28.97 28.92
.05
125
731
72
.05
86
.06
109
722
73
73
1 .63
1 18
4.95 4.86 5.67 30.44
30.00 29.68 29.68 30.00
842 4494
2499 2499 2499 2223
11483 11990 13363 63573
72
.1875 .1875 .1875 .1875
1 .47
94
72
1 .52
101
28.36 28.94
29.68 29.68
4207 4297
2223 2223
61544 61761
69
.1875 .1875
A-20
-------
PCTI PERCNT IS0KINETIC
MF PARTICULATE - PR0BE
CYCL0NE AND FILTER,
MG.
MT PARTICULATE T0TAL,
MG.
CAN PARTICIPATE PR0BE
CYCL0NE AND FILTER
GR/SCF
CA0 PARTICULATE T0TAL
GR/SCF
CAT PARTICULATE PR0BE
CYCL0NE AND FILTER*
GR/CF AT STACK C0ND
CAU PARTICULATE T0TAL
GR/CF AT STACK C0ND
CAW PARTICULATE PR0BE
CYCL0NE AND FILTER*
LB/HR.
CAX PARTICULATE T0TAL
LB/HR.
PCTEA PERCENT EXCESS
AIR AT SAMPLING PT
431 409 378 94 92 99
412.9 204.1 209.6 129.7 59.4 69.9
421.8 222.2 227.3 143.1 64.0 80.4
.1609 .0792 .0791 .0374 .0180 .0205
.1644 .0862 .0857 .0413 .0194 .0235
.1456 .0758 .0722 .0343 .0170 .0190
.1487 .0825 .0783 .0378 .0183 .0219
15.8 8.1
16.2 8.9
9.1 20.4
9.8
16197 16197 16197
22.5
16197
9.5 10.8
10.2 12.5
16197 16197
A-21
-------
NAME OF FIRM UNION CARBIDE
LOCATION OF PLANT ASHTABULA #13 .
TYPE OF PLANT REACTIVE METALS
CONTROL EQUIPMENT SCRUBBER
SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS SOUTH WEST HOOD EXHAUST, SOUTH EAST HOOD EXHAUST
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED TOTAL PARTICULATE
TIME OF PARTICULATE TEST
RUN NO SEH-2 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 851 END 1010
RUN NO SEH-3 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 1221 END 1341
RUN NO SWH-1 DATE 2-22-72 BEGIN 1415 END 1531
RUN NO SWH-2 . DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 855 END 1010
RUN NO SWH-3 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 1228 END 1343
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN NO. SEH-2 SEH-3 SWH-1 SWH-2 SWH-3
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE 29.68 29.68 30-00 29.68 29.68
INCHES HG ABSOLUTE
PM ORIFICE PRESSURE .42 1.19 2.20 L 89 1.73
DROP* INCHES WATER
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS 22.39 36.21 54.32 51.76 49.44
SAMPLED AT METER
CONDITIONS* CU.FT.
TM AVERAGE GAS METER 51.9 62.7 73.2 7LI 79-0
TEMPERATURE* DEG. F
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRY 23.0 36.5 54.4 51.4 48.4
GAS SAMPLED AT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
CU.FT.
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED 2«9 4.1 1.6 .6 7.5
ML.* IMPINGERS AND
SILICA GEL
VWGAS VOLUME OF WATER .14 .19 .08 .03 .36
VAPOR COLLECTED.
CU.FT. AT STANDARD
CONDITIONS
PCTM PERCENT MOISTURE .59 .53 .14 .06 .73
IN THE STACK GAS BY
VOLUME
MD MOLE FRACTION OF .994 .995 .999 -999 .993
DRY GAS
PCTC02 PERCENT C02 1.00 LOO LOO LOO LOO
PCT02 PERCENT 02 20*70 20-70 20.70 20« 70 20.70
PCTN2 PERCENT N2 78.30 78-30 78.30 78.30 78«30
A-22
-------
MWD MOLECULAR WEIGHT
OF DRY STACK GAS
MW MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS
DELPS VELOCITY HEAD
OF STACK GAS*
INCHES OF WATER
TS STACK .TEMPERATURE*
DEG.F.
DPS X CTS + 460)
PS STACK PRESSURE, IN.
HG. ABSOLUTE
VS STACK VELOCITY AT
STACK CONDITIONS,
FPM
AS STACK AREA, SO.IN.
OS STACK GAS VOLUME AT
STANDARD CONDI TON
*SCFM
TT NET TIME OF TEST,
MIN.
DN SAMPLING NOZZLE
DIAMETER, IN.
PCTI PERCNT ISOKINETIC
MF PARTICULATE - PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
MG.
MT PARTICULATE TOTAL,
MG.
CAN PARTI CULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER
GR/SCF
CAO PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/SCF
CAT PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAU PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/CF AT STACK COND
28.99 28.99 28.99 28.99 28.99
28.92 28.93 28.97 28.98 28.91
.34
66
13.04
29.68
1937
2499
33383
63
31 1.79 1.57 1.43
76
61
47
72
72
61
12.59 30.41 28.07 27.16
29.68 29-80 29*68 29.60
1868 4502 4164 4039
2499 2148 2148 2148
31652 67973 64308 60239
72
1875 .2500 .1875 .1875 .1875
99 , 93 86 86 87
68.7 86.8 177.3 95.2 122.4
76.2 90.7 183.7 146.7 217.7
.0460 .0366 .0502 .0285 .0390
.0510 .0383 .0520 .0439 .0693
.0457 .0357 .0508 .0295 .0389
.0506 .0373 .0526 .0454 .0692
A-23
-------
CAW PARTICULATE PROBE 13.2 9«9 29.2 15.7 20-1
CYCLONE AND FILTER,
LB/HR.
CAX PARTICULATE TOTAL 14.6 10-4 30.3 24.2 35.8
LB/HR.
PCTEA PERCENT EXCESS 16197 16197 16197 16197 16197
AIR AT SAMPLING PT
LOG*X
LOGOFF.
A-24
-------
NAME OF FIRM UNION CARBIDE
LOCATION OF PLANT -- ASHTABULA #13
TYPE OF PLANT REACTIVE METALS
CONTROL EQUIPMENT SCRUBBER
SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS B TAP EXHAUST
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED TOTAL PARTICULATE
TIME OF PARTICULATE TEST
RUN NO BTE-1 DATE 2-23-72 BEGIN 1530 END 1630
RUN NO BTE-2 DATE 2-24-72 BEGIN 903 END 1003
RUN NO BTE-3 DATE 2-24-72 BEGIN 1034 END 1134
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
RUN NO. BTE-1 BTE-2 BTE-3
PB BAROMETRIC PRESSURE 29.68 29.30 29-30
INCHES HG ABSOLUTE
PM ORIFICE PRESSURE 1.65 1.64 L61
DROP* INCHES WATER
VM VOLUME OF DRY GAS 41.04 41.15 41.37
SAMPLED AT METER
CONDITIONS* CU.FT.
TM AVERAGE GAS METER 81.9 88.8 103-5
TEMPERATURE* DEC. F
VMSTD VOLUME OF DRY 40-0 39.0 38.2
GAS SAMPLED AT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
CU.FT.
VW TOTAL H20 COLLECTED 3.2 9.3 31.4
ML.* IMPINGERS AND
SILICA GEL
VWGAS VOLUME OF WATER .15 .44 1.49
VAPOR COLLECTED.
CU.FT. AT STANDARD
CONDITIONS
PCTM PERCENT MOISTURE .38 1.12 3.75
IN THE STACK GAS BY
VOLUME
MD MOLE FRACTION OF .996 .989 .963
DRY GAS
PCTC02 PERCENT C02 LOO LOO LOO
PCT02 PERCENT 02 20.80 20.80 20.80
PCTN2 PERCENT N2 78.20 78-20 78-20
MWD MOLECULAR WEIGHT 28.99 28.99 28.99
OF DRY STACK GAS
-------
MW MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF 28»95
STACK GAS
DELPS VELOCITY HEAD .39
OF STACK GAS*
INCHES OF WATER
TS STACK TEMPERATURE, 122
DEG.F.
DPS X (TS + 460) 15-04
PS STACK PRESSURE* IN. 29.68
HG. ABSOLUTE
28.87 28.58
.38
126
15.01
29.30
VS STACK VELOCITY AT
STACK CONDITIONS*
FPM
DN SAMPLING NOZZLE
DIAMETER* IN.
MT PARTICULATE TOTAL*
MG.
CAN PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER
GR/SCF
CAO PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/SCF
CAT PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER*
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAU PARTICULATE TOTAL
GR/CF AT STACK COND
CAW PARTICULATE PROBE
CYCLONE AND FILTER*
LB/HR.
CAX PARTICULATE TOTAL 53.6
LB/HR.
PCTEA PERCENT EXCESS 1733333
AIR AT SAMPLING PT
.38
149
15. 16
29.30
2231 2245 2280
AS STACK AREA* SO.IN. 2124 2124 2124
QS STACK GAS VOLUME AT 29613 29011 27590
STANDARD CONDI TON
*SCFM
TT NET TIME OF TEST* 60 60 60
MIN.
.2500 .2500 .2500
PCTI PERCNT ISOKINETIC 97 97 100
MF PARTI CULATE - PROBE 536.0 481.0 465.8
CYCLONE AND FILTER*
MG.
548.1 511.7 475.0
.2066 .1897 .1877
2113 .2018 1914
1858 1660 1539
.1900 .1766 1569
52.4 47.2 44.4
50.2 45.2
1733333
A-26
1733333
-------
REPORT NO.
PAGE
OF
PAGES
SOURCE TESTING CALCULATION FORMS
Test No. BSE
No. Runs
Name of Firm Union Carbide^
Location of Plant AshtabuU 113
Type of Plant
Reactive Metals
Control Equipment Scrubber
Sampling Point Locations Scrubber Exhaust
Pollutants Sampled Total Particulate
Time of Particulate Test:
Run No._
Run No.
BSE-1
BSE-2
JRun No. BSE-3
!Run No.
Date 2-23-72
Date 2-24-72
Date 2-24-72
Date
Begin 1520
Begin 0855
Begin 1010
Begin
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA
End 1620
End 0955
End 1110
End
Run No
P, barometric pressure, "Hg Absolute
P orifice pressure drop, "H2Q
V volume of dry gas sampled % meter
m conditions, ft.3
T Average Gas Meter Temperature, °F
V Volume of Dry Gas Sampled @
std. Standard Conditions, ft.3
V Total HpO collected, ml., Impingers
& Silica Gel.
V Volume of Water Vapor Collected
gas ft.3 @ Standard Conditions*
BSE-1
29.30
1.0
38.32
71
38.00
15.0
0.71
BSE-2
29.68
1.0
35.32
86
34.06
9.2
0.44
BSE-3
29.68
1.0
36.11
94
34.32
7.1
0.34
* 70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-27
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (cont'd)
Run No.
C - Particulate, total, gr/cf
au 6 stack cond.
C - Particulate, probe, cyclone,
aw and filter, Ib/hr.
C - Particulate - total, Ib/hr.
ax * .
% EA- % Excess air @
sampling point
BSE-1
0.0449
0.533
0.566
BSE-2
0.0328
0.266
0.4T5
BSE-3
0.0361
0.413
0.455
12.5
70°F, 29.92" Hg.
A-28
-------
PARTICULATE EMISSION DATA (CONT'D)
1 Run No.
%M -7« Moisture in the stack gas by
volume
Md - Mole fraction of dry gas
% C02
% 02
% N2
M W
-------
APPENDIX B
COMPLETE GASEOUS RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
The following are tracings from the recorder connected to the infrared
carbon monoxide analyzer showing the carbon monoxide levels.
Scale divisions X 50 = ppm CO.
B-l
-------
o
o*
o
o
u
o
Chart Speed 1 inch/mln
Scale Divisions
x 50 = ppm CO
11:30 a.m.
I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-------
n
8
B
'4
3
Z
I
S
o
o
2
South Hood
#20 Furnace
-------
South Hood
120 Furnace
-------
South Hood
#20 Furnace
r
-------
South West Hood
D Port #13 Furnace
2/23/72
-------
South-West Hood
Continued From
Preceding Page
-------
o
£
o
o
a
z
o
2
8
I
5
o
IL
O
o
CD
fi
H
01
§
B
South West Hood
2/23/72
-------
I
o
o
2
u
u.
O
i
M
O
CD
W
1
en
B Tap Exhaust
#13 Furnace
2/23/72
-------
o
o
I
u
8
i
0!
2
N
0)
s
*
B
B Tap Exhaust
Continued From
Preceding Page
I I I i I I I I I ! I I I I I ! I I I i I i
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
Location
Date 2
Operator
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Comments:
Test
/
Is'
A\lt>
(co2)
Reading 1
0, 1~.
0^
0, ^
(o2)
Reading 2
-ZO.g'
^7
2.^,?
(CO)
Reading 3
Z^,^ '
'2^,7
2.0,7
NG'\r-3] (12/07)
B-n
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location_
Date ^
Time
Operator
095
Comments:
Test
/
2
3
4(/&
(co2)
Reading 1
0.02- .
0,03
0.07.
ft,DV
(o2)
Reading 2
7-^, 7
^0,^
1,6,6
20,7
(CO)
Reading 3
20.7
2-0.3
10.7 '
-L0.7
NQA.P-31 (12/67)
B-12
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
/) AV-/U2
Location £t>,7
z^7
(CO)
Reading 3
20.7
^0 , '-?
ZA 7
2-0,7
NdVP-31 (12/G7)
B-13
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date_
Time
P. M,
Operator
Comments:
Test
(co2)
Reading 1
(02)
Reading 2
(CO)
Reading 3
0,0.
7-0.
, o
i-.o
NC/YP-31 (12/67)
B-14
-------
Part 10, p. 7 of 8
ORSAT FIELD DATA
Location
Date
Time A H ,
Operator
Comments:
Test
1
(co2)
Reading 1
1.5 -
(o2)
Reading 2
'7.5*
(CO)
Reading 3
4=70.0"
i&&4
u
NG/VP-31 (12/67)
B-15
-------
Part 10, p. 2 of 8
VELOCITY TRAVERSE FIELD DATA
Test
Location
Date
/J*
Operator
c*F
Clock
Time
AP> in. H,.Q
Stack
Temp., °|
^ng
7,
AP
7C
0 / STf
3C
2L
**
- Calculation columns, not Field data
Continents:
NCAP-29 (12/67)
1500 , 29.30 v 273 + 37
i-j,*i\j Y t./j T j/ icc/i
^5752" A 273 + 26 = 1554
B-16
-------
APPENDIX C
COMPLETE OPERATION RESULTS WITH EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
PRODUCT MADE:
AVG. WATER FLOWS:
50% FeSi (Hard Cast)
North Scrubber - 422 GPM
South Scrubber - 302 GPM
TWLopuszynski:clj
Plant 60616
Ashtabula, Ohio
February 25, 1972
TESTr-'l'
DATE PLACL
2-15-72
2-17-72
Hood
2-16-72 Hood
Taphole Duct
Scrubber
FURNACE NO. 20 OPERATING DATA
TESTING
TIME
1330-1715
1100-1300
1430-1615
1645-1030
1348-1405
1640-1655
1406-1410
1543-1605
1637-1707
AVERAGE
FURNACE KW
DURING TEST
50200 KW
48700 KW
52300 KW
50000 KW
40500 KW
39500 KW
40500 KW
39500 KW
39500 KW
TAPHOLE
OPEN TIME
DURING TEST
1355-1410
1500-1515
1615-1630
1730-1755
1150-1210
1430-1445
1535-1555
1650-1720
1345-1410
1645-1555
1345-1410
Not Open
1645-1655
2-18-72 Taphole Duct 1014-1026
42000 KW
1020-1040
C-l
-------
FURNACE NO. 13 OPERATING DATA
Plant 60616
Ashtabula, Ohio
February 29, 1972
DATE
TEST PLACE
TIME
ACCURATE * AVG.
FURNACE LOAD (KW)
2-22-72
2-23-72
2-24-72
2-23-72
2-24-72
2-24-72
Hood
Hood
Hood
Scrubber Exhaust
Scrubber Exhaust
Scrubber Exhaust
Tap Exhaust
Tap Exhaust
Tap Exhaust
1410-1530
1215-1345
0850-1030
1520-1620
855- 955
1010-1110
1530-1630
903-1003
1034-1134
22,800
23,000
21,500
24,000
23,800
23,500
24,000
23,800
23,300
* In general, strip charts read approximately 500 KW low.
PRODUCT MADE:
WATER FLOW:
CaC2 (80-85% Grade)
Maximum - 490 GPM
Minimum - 324 GPM
Average - 450 GPM
KJKnapp:clj
C-2
-------
r
i -f
? n
ri-i-ijj
i i in
I ' JjJJ>i.' *! | I U-i i i
HpMIpTteMl
rftJl|JliiiiJJjJJJ-iJJi':;-^a $ I' i
nntgiprii^
MiM^M
i I M Mill'lU^^. !|ii>Ti
^. i | !-i i-l-^-*-rT- . j»T | i L>Ti I !
: LliuJjlil^iSwjMt
iriMJiiii.u-^MiiL!|-!-
nmr?imugMtIlB.R
Ijrs
tM
I I I ! M
ppmPPB w
MiiWteii^ii-.,.
^!-HJ|g! i i iS;lT STT Si' LBlU'.V*! !U
Itt^atekEG^^i rf
Wl^TlTilTMFit-iM^^r
iHUi.iliilTiTrr-4 tifit!nil!Ji{'.>ii
llj]pf!]fe!
2l'iV
ll
;j-il:-*r-i',i .LHf
liLim^JiiJjr,
1JJJ
P.
| !,»>
U4
1
1!
₯
i
i
l!!!i
J-
s
>
o
z
c
(/>
w
CT
!v!
F'--.l
fl
!!
l-i
u
l-l
f. T
.'^
!l
C-3
-------
rr^^U-H-^'^: M i i-HU-^fj j j >|1i
' !! i i: i i M !! i : ^) L\+W\\ tjj^: '' jj-f
mimM^i&m^
^^ '! '^ ^
^^Wr^ammrT^rn^^pw^m^ 11-
t^Tr>iurnTfUiijiiiiii!!i,i!ji!i ti^Ui^mWUJ i^
RMiteoHO^^ 1L;
Vj!; i ' T i i-^i; i i ir-^rrri \\\ rj. i :J»r-'
'"^N^r -''mr;' '-^---!--ii:j^..|- -i-^; i.|Uj^i-K': = :.'::;. -
C-4
-------
-
C-5
-------
5Fr3
WMIM
mMKi^
f-'! trUi!; :"~!-;4j!_U --' ~T: ~r~:~'~~~''Trr\l
f"
C-6
-------
..M\^!mmw^^mm\\ mm m\
^
m \\\mm^\\m.m
rrrwrrnTnit^rpiij^n^
.:..U!~iJ.i-;-u-H-n!-rrji .a ;...:-? ir-T
Li i n^ljipMnuK:i:.i
t!-H4iiiuiiTTji[!iniijj|jtmrniH-^
FH&iiiiirrf jMitfllRiff; '&*' '^
F 1111 i iTTTf-H-H- !!! i-j-hrm IN' Aj^-rTi \ \ ^-\ \
ijl.1 lijiTrH-1
MTltf^JJllM
ri-ff^'r^TTr7! i' i.i.^-rl'!'5 iv-r')
-,-~-Trrrry,' c3v J^n i;; >^ri
I I 1 ' ' i I I * " 1 * i ' | } ' ' , ' .j^*^ i ' '
?; i i' 11 i i ;^j-j-rfAV i ;' ^ i ;>
^-4^--TTT« 111 I ici --1 M i'! J'^ r'
Mi ; J'iiLUy-H 4- i ;jj^: i;' I ^
_;-»rrn i ,»-/ j>^' i i i :!-.
IMiiMSiMH b
C-7
-------
APPENDIX D
FIELD DATA
-------
i ".<»>
:fo, .p.
a
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY 'IMPORTANT - FIL.LJN.-AJ4 BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. .
Srapls Box No.
Meter Box No.
-
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg
J4
Assumed Moisture "
Operator
Prcba Master Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F ^~0
cJ^+yJ J>
Probe Tip Dia., In._4|
Point
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet 1 Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Tc^p.
°F
Itnpinger
°F
Stock
Press
in. Hq
StaCk
$ /fate*' I /?;*/*.
' "I~m '-' - ii . 1 . ^* I
/go
T
/> / r
y, / v
5 V
i 3i/?;.>~7 i^»r»?
r nr : y
. ^1 i«.' ft i- k0w^. g I
.1 9;.
^£^.
7?
MO
_2^r
7 t,
i //
I2*T7/ fr
I g-o
t 0
s" 1
.7o
j_L3o\i\_j_oo
21
'-."I /oo
1-L-
yy; 3 S
y. ^ I
y/
bo
, 2 o
y ,
//
J 6 ; o
/")£.. ~}
1,70
Q
J.
10
/^.'/
^-^^
»6/J>o.
J /./P
/ n r^
) 0
3-1/6'. as'
Zi^L
I/O
/.
/fa
Ty./o
/tlaax
o-
il
- /
/6': 3 7
j L
/ I ^^p I
r 1^1
1,146
//
?H
-------
^^ sr*' ^^ "^r^
Point
o
y
. .r
_ ' 6
^"M/
i
1
i
(
Lec^- ^
Clock
T1JBS
y ; 6 ix
/ jT- 7 2- /V/
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
P*/i 7
?OiJ.S
70 7. 7
->/0,l
.
>y ^
Pi tot
in. HgO
Ap
i.ao
) ,10
Q i^*
/ > o ^* .
>^76
Orifice
in Ho
De-sired
h 3^"
1 < fl JT
l< I o
),Ao
AH
Actual
Li±"
h 2 i"
1.; o
;,3 o
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
) I %
/a»
> ao
Temp .
Outlet
_$L\
9^-
9SV
I
vy'
Ip.pinger
°F
^,0
/
/
vlx
Stcck'
Press
in. Ho
ZS'. S*
1
/
V
-
St2Ck
Tcn-p
°F
loo
9 £"'
-91 6^
1
^.-
1
i
1
I
r\>
Coir.msnts:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL N-ALL BLANKS
.2.
oJtf&A^-i.o
Plant
Run No.
Location
Date Z
--CL
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No. g,
Heter Box No. /£_
Probe Length *f'
/*T
Ambient Temp °F___J22
Bar. Press. "Hg 39-
AssuT.ed Moisture %
; Oparator
Probe Heater Setting & e>
Heater Sox Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Point
Clock
\>Nfal?- &>\ II'. o o
> i \ j) 0 y
ll ft: o %
3\/r, / 2,
*/!;;: / £,
^
/
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
7; 7, />:L-
-JH \-tj
75V, ; o
51 n ' 3>o ! 73£>, o
:$;&/> 6
?/Sr7"
// .' ay I 7 33 , 3 3_
y, : ay 1 733. 32.
Pi tot
in. H20
!,(.£>
i , l !; / .' £*) 1 7 3 k . 1
*H)J 3lll : 37
} 3 9 i ft .i'
7/V ) i S^
V«M* ^|n . ty/ | 741^ ,*, 0
A-
i 575 /a d
J*;WA- 1 7^^-, 3-7
y|ia9 t "J y L > is o
*>r*sf l/i ;*- o i 7V6 6Bje ^
\ sfrsj-
\fJCjr.(2> i
2
va;;o 1 7/7. 5*7
1 V * / n
1 90
/ i ?0
;.TO
/3o
I n
V , 3 o
/ 1^.0
y / b"o
y / '\ o
I i 3(0
[ i 5c
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
),-)S~
S.oo
ot'ffO
1 i 1 i"
) ,^^~
; cj-s''
Actual
I.-7S-
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet
4<9
3.Q-0 £, f
3.00 75
/ O JT
y . c. y
/ .fb'
^ . « .f ,3 , o s'
J , r r
/ i w sT
;, ar
1 i 1 O
} I 1 O
1 , / 0
h 'Is"
/. 7, y
1 9o
// ^^T
/ . o s-
1
/ 1 y
9o
y i 6b*
1 , o \"
i &f
1 Ov
96
9£
9 P
IOC
) 0 D
J o y
1 0
7C
7 u
?6
")t^
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
f
s"
5-
jj-
tr
5-
6
6
g"
7
6
P^ 1 (e
7%
7t
to
So
8b
f
y o
1 1
Box
Tenp.
°F
cPx5"°
Irr.pinger
Te^p
°F
6 o
6 G
& o
! | ^, <9
1
/i i
/i 1
y o |
6.0
<>*
60
6d?
/£ O
60 ]
60 I
60
i"
/ 7 o
I 7 0
;
JL&
1 T^ . i
5(. Ti"
/a?
y _3 o
/3s
J4iT
-------
fe
r
t
o
-t*
&
^ ' V .,
^-o
Point
AVS6--. 3
4
S
fe
triud
^ i _,
.
^<#*^£
5Sv ^
^Clock
Tircs
y^- p?
/»J 3;
/A: SJ
/^.'^
.
£4ft-U )^&
-/6-?Jl
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
767-^2.
769, av
?-)/.>> y
57 3. St-9
f> eft i °
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
;, ?o
// / o
) , ox
) l 0 i'
Orifice
in Ho
Desired
> , 20
1 i 0 a .
, *
y
^a
S-fi
ffc
.
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gougs
/ ,)
/ ij"
)*/
ILJ
Box
Ter.p.
Op
D..i."o
^
s~
s
Inpinger
T£r;:p
°F
6 0
f^
^
^-"
C*- -.^.1.
JtUvC.
Press
in. Hq
^^3
»
/
X
Stsck
Ten;?
op
/4-JT
140
(Wff
y JTJL.
»
P
k
!
1
Comments:
.NCAP-37-(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Run No.
Location
Date ,
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJ^ALL, BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. -^ u »,, \ .
Sample Box Ho.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length _
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
Operator
Prcba Heater Sotting
Assumed Moisture %._
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Clock
Tin:e
Dry Gas
Meter; CF
Pitot
in. H20
Ap
Orifice
in H
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Desired " Actual | inlet j Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Temp
°F
Impinger
Tesp
°F
Stcck
Press
in. Hg
Stack
Tcn:p
°
9 7 3
7 7 jT, 6
1
a I > V ' I I I
311 3', L\ i!
l.lo
20
6V 1
is 0
' 11 3 : 5 o I 7 £ a . T o
0
?-'f ,
, a
y,
9/7
? .0
S L, t
I L_
7.1
-> 1 ' 9
_iL
7<<9
/ , i' p
/ 'I i- <*
:> 9 / &o
I > I C I /<9 'fc
^Jl
goo
7 9 3
, $ 0
I /OLf
-o
) ?
; / )
49?
J
(, 0
t M » 1 "S
MH-1-/I In 'i
2.1
,
f > a v- I /VJL r: I
Sra
If !M
// ^'Q
1s'
Jtf
7?
/jTa
/, a y I 11 2 r I / o a.
(0
fnO
^o_
^l
!' *
/.yo
VOW
AJL.
3 ''
- y
V 0
_Ll£.
loo
^ o I {
90
JJ-L
/ 0 O |
V
a)/ 0
-------
S&5&
C^S
4£&
Point
3
tf
^
L
*J*fi L
TW
1
I
i
i
1
I
i
1
£'4U|£
fnSs- -'
'* Clock
h Tis:a
]«f } */ I
lil'.ttu
IUIU7
1 4 ,T 0
ft^te^ q
f^HT-7 »
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
S'/o , 37
^ / ?, , i o
8 i a , jri
9-/W i 4 »
t>>^
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
1 , i D
1 . 0 5f'r
, ? /
/7 o
.
Dry Gas
°F
[Jr. let
1 0 )-
LC >.
; o»/
XtfW
,
.
Temp.
Outlet
76.
7 (r
") (.
It,
Pu^ip
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
6
6,
£
<.
,
Box
Te.T.p.
°F
as -o
**
^
s
Impir.ger
Tc:;-p
°F
(* 6
s
s
..-
.
Sta
Pre
in.
\
ck
ss
r!q
f
Stcck
Tcn-.p
op
aoo
a?^'
5 «l A"
S3o
»
»
1
:
i
1
Corar.snts:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5 '
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
' Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg
Probe h'aatsr Setting
Assumed Moisture 2_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in H-,0
Desired
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Temp.
°F
Ircpinger
Tsmp
Stack
Press
in. rig
Stack
Tcn:p
op
Jl/^TU I
JJL
-6JL
, 77
/ , or o
v,
(o O
ii .. *j^-«j^^fc»^»»
VI17! e> o
a, o
l>tt , ?6 I
_L 2_
ACL
JL&-
3iOl/
iT.^1
3
I ) O
I , to
(00
Ql*
iao.
) : o 7
Z
JLL
gg».
I,**
2y_
JL
6ff
31 )>:
/.fi'O
y,
6,0
\-K
; /9
d) O
^.
_&J2-
X
I A ?^
J^L
* ?
', J7 I 7.
y ^ a.
/.o
, tt,f
n ; 3.
. 27
/ ,
y,
i. 16
Ire I
to
0
'! )7: TV I
L -70
i. T
/CO
no .
n.- 95
/f»p
jL
JB-J /. Vtf
I I of
*1n-
/P3r
|^;^j
;. / o I ;, / o
lo
Lo
9 *
S, If < IP 3». »>.
-^ l>5g. JT
) 0 0
/. 0
-7^
y , s^
yp o I fr-^
I j/ o
-------
n
i
m
t
\
Point
J/W£-«-3
& q
* 5
> <
End
'
.
. i
i
Clock
lira
)?: ro 0
1 , 0 C
AH
0
Actual
),**>"
l.a'e
iiOO
1,00.
.
,
.
.
Dry Gas
°F
|_inlct'
)Qo
S d> t)
S 6 ej
9*
Temp.
Outlet
X1~
K i-
VL-
S3
'
.
Pu^ip
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
3
?,
1
3
Box
Te^p.
°F
ikr<9
s
s"
s
Impir.ger
Te:;:P
°F
(*O
^-' "
^~'
^
'
S*. . ^ i.
UUv,^
Press
in. He;
2.9.3
/
/
i
Stsck
Tcn-.p
Op
)££'
MB
1 If
/aS
i
t
;
Cor.rr.ents:
NCAP-37-(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PI ant
PARTI CULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT' - FULJII.AL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No. C_H £ T
Location
Date
Box Ho.
~ *-
-
Ambient Temp *F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Heter Box No. £ I - "L
Probe Length S^
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture %__
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In.
°F
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. K2°
AP
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet I Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Te.rp.
°F
Ircpinger
Ts^p
°F
Press
in. Hq
Stack
Tcn:p
01-
" /h'l
fiV,
. 0
I/D* ! l
!/mt
.*)<
~) V
75
JL^.
I. L
'/.T.
8-0
l.o
^
<
/
? r
I 11
-7
444:
n
g.Q
JH
±L
o-) i
I
7,5*
I /i Q3 I
J^L
-l^t-
:*> I / >-
I / w
7.0
i C_-'
AVC
i y '""
i /« -i-
-------
.
Point
<7*,7
D-/
P-?-
n-^
v>lf
D-T
D<
E*KJ.
i
1
1
1
'
1
i
1
Clock
Tijsa
A^XX
A^^t
}V^O
17-^1
£V
/XlX
tX V£
'
-
Dry Gas
Water, CF
9*/,9o
9 6. 9^
W.fr9
/«K>.^
/ot-'tr
fr>^-0(>
l-nt.oi
Pi tot
in. H20
Ap
i°l °
/-?-
y.^>
ho
J-l
h&
Orifice
in H0
Desired "
LIT
L*i
L 5^<
AH
0
Actual
I.K
t. *
;.T_<~
/. o-<-
/. v
;. ?L*r
.
Dry Gas
°F
inlet
)Crt>
/or-
lr)*r
/or
t&r
Temp.
Outlet
'f^~
/(rt>
l<^>
/ o-O
ffrt>
/ rrt>
Purap
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
q,
,
Box
Te.r.p.
°F
2^a
J
/
//
Impir.ger
Tcr;:p
°F
^«
i
/
)
v
.
Stack
Press
in. rig
29W
i
/
/
>b
.
Stcck
Ten:?
Or-
l-Va
)7oT
y3?-
A5^
;^r
//r
»
.
h
:
Corar.ants:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
N
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
|->./bv/«*l
Run No.
Location
Dcte
A^~ ^/^ ^7
-7
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA (Jv
«
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN. ALL BLANKS <
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Mo. '
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
2.0.6
-0 7 It,*-
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
1
Oparator
Probe Heater Sotting "2
Assumed Moisture %__
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In._
°F
T - 1
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Kster, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice -.AH
in HoO
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
Inlet Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
To^p.
°F
Inpinger
>- -,^\,
LU>_A
Press
in. Hq
Stack
Tc-p
1&.
^_C
£&.
rM
_ 63
frA I ?. A
1 / /I
A-C
<~r ! i /
1.0 l.h
r/T
/
-°
fi-3
II4.6
/ >- - 1 r
T-
/.
.d
/36
C -
ir-
-------
t '-. "
ifO
Point
iS/B/T"
p~l
o-x
D-3
O"*f
D'T
>~fe
/EM^
Clock
/
I. 1
1 i
1 ,7^
) "^ -
1
1
. i
i
.
.
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
i
/> T*-^"
7^-7
' *?»"?
/ » ^~"
/. &*Z~
i
I
i
1
Actual
/. 0
/ . A>
Dry Gas Tenip.
°F
Inlet
' G C"
/ o,^-
/. £C~
no
jiO
I/O
Outlet
/ 6 t>
f (T*
Pcmp _
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
V ,o
*?.&
/ ^O e),^T
//» £~
J ^ S~
/(?$-
!
i&.o
)t .S""
/^k*5"
V
Box
Te^.p.
°F
t
(
to
. 1
- ' .'-Jlte*:.
Impinger
°F
7e>
^
Cf.^^'1.
Press
in. :-!fj
"2^6
Stack
Ten:?
op
)3o
1 / V6
/ ^
-------
Part 1C, p. 4 df 8
Plant
Run No
. C* - //" ^ "
Location
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT -FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
'Ambient Temp °F 5%
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture 2
Oparator
A -3L
C-
*14
/. "S-7
b I
1 id
-N!
/.
..xn ?r
T./i
4-1
U /.<~1>
4+
«4£
\. o
.ru
o r
lr
/.
-------
Paint
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
P1tot
in. HgO
AP
Orific
in H00
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet ! Outlet
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Te^p.
°F
Impir.ger
Temp
Stack
Press
in. Hg
Stcck
leap
°F
£
43J-
3£
£3.
£
LOL
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
A £
f J" (j" '^ '
Plant
Run No.
- f
Location 5bUTtt-t+orA-£x#0,9sT
Dtte
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALLj,BLAN.KS
Read and record at the start of'each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every'5
minutes. .
''
*?
Sample Box No. -^
Meter Box No. 3
- /
Probe Length ^>
/A 2
As - *\g
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture %
Oparator
"f
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In._
Point
Clock
Tiss
Dry Gas
Kater, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in H^O
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Desired 1 Actual | inlet j Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
Box
Tomp.
°F
Impir.ger
°F
Stock
Press /
in. rirj
Stsck
r
do*, SI
7V
?0
I '; S"^ |
/i
I/O
T*T
70
20
! \
i
) I OO
/, ZJ
70
/a 8
O
.76,
So
£0
7°
10
20
3O
JO
,23
72,
I //
B-l
I hi i
7V
A'
-2
A 6
IL
A A
!>
I t.oo I
/JT
no
1,10
100
t,L
160
to
70
no
r^r
I //7. 100
IM
//Z.
06
I 10
ff)t,
no
l&l
70
^
IO1
10
/ad
-------
'.
;
a
i
|
I
i
i
Paint
Vrftf-r
p-i
-2,
-3
-(/
X1
-s.
JSFL.CL.
f^^&*{
-£ "fffiAt,
'
-
Clock
Tirco
/£ P*
<^7
t
i,
lot
)Q2
fo9
(6?
temp.
Outlet
8T-
?-2^
8^-
Pu^pf
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gsugs
10
I1~
13
'1ST
or
it-
if
,
.
.
j it
f
Box
Temp .
°F
2i-t>
7<9«:3e' 5 >/
<7 4
Impir.ger
Tes:p
°F
7o
-7
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
s/
Run No.
Location
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Ho.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture %
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Mecter Box Setting, °F 2O~O
Probe Tip Dia., In. ", >
Point
Clock
T1ss:s
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
Pi tot
in.
AP
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet I Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Tc.^p.
F
Ip.pinger
°F
Stcck
Press
in. Hg
Stack
Tc-p
op
-------
rr
1
*/'V7V SAf^'-a
Po-int
f~*T&M f
_> ffilL *
Ql
'7-
Clock
Tis:a
JZff
t4*t
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
i'J
-3 r?
.- ^ / j * /
^y
-- £,
£*jd
13 Of
1 3 0*1
\
/4& ,4*^
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
/.3
/» "^
L±*f
/, 3
) ^
.4o
» °IQ
1
.
^]
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired
* ^£>
h*"
)i *~
^i
lf y
//*
/' *
\
\
Actual
/i V
A i "^
y/4~
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet 1 Outlet
°IO
Qo
*t o
/I A/- ^O
1
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
t
PARTI CULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
t. '
'-'*;
PI ant
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No.
Location
Date
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
r
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
Assumed Moisture
ft
<->
Heater Box Setting, °F 2^0
Probe Tip Dia., In._
-------
Point
fTtiftT
t>->
Clock
T1JSS
AS"^7
3"
Stack
Press
in. Hn
29.VS
f
1
I
.
Stack
Tcn:p
°F
>70
>
*
176
/7
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
Run No.
Location
Dste «
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALt^ BLANKS;
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
tfBient'Ternp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Probe Length ..$
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., I;
-------
1
j<
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
^C
?6
its
ft)
^0
*To
__J6>
Stit
Temp.
Outlet
7t>
7d
70
70
70
"?o
70
""*' r --r - ?*
-y >
Pusjp f
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
7,0
7,0
7/0
7/0
7»d
br£
3c
JtsT
'
i
i
;
1
Comments:
NCAP-37-(12/67)
-------
;:::.g?'v/L
>> .._PARTICUL^fE"F]ELD DATA
I' '
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN..ALL_ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. -
Probe Length
''/iAmbient Temp °F_
". Press. "Hg
, 3
''Assumed Moisture
Prcba Heater Setting
&.
Heater Sox Setting,
"Probe Tip Dia., In._
Orifice 'AH
in H.O
Dry Gas Tcrnp.
op
Desired " Actual I Inlet I Cutlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Temp.
°F
Impinger
°F
Stock
Press
i n .
Stack
Te-.p
;zi:
-------
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL, BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
<£ytest point or, if single point
sampling, read and.record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting
wr
Ambient Temp °F
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture % /_
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In._
Orifice AH
in Hx,0
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
inlet Outlet
Panp
Vacuum
Tn HP
.11. ..(,
Gouge
Box
Temp.
°F
Impinger
. Vi"
O
<
0
-"
2K
*£
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
?ur,t
Run No
. /f r£
Location
Dite
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA"**"
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN . ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, i'f ^j^gle point
sampling, read and'record every 5
minutes. j .
£ J
Operator
Sraple Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
^ 1
-
&LL
Bar. Press. "Hg
- /
f f
(\
Probe Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting, °F_25f_^
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Kater, CF
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
Orifice A
in HoO
Dry Gas Temp.
op
De-sired
Actual I Inlet Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gauge
Box
Irr.pinger
F
F
10
y.
7T
// i n v7A
/, r
i /& o
A 7',
Mr
'. 7r I /,7r
rr
fe>
'/«!
.6
f I /t> o-X I /CY^>) j
rt
, .
,r
A
-------
Part 10, p. '4 of 8
punt
PARTI CULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - nLLJN^.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Ambient Temp °F
Run No.
Location
Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length ^
Operator
Probe Heater Setting p
Bar. Press. "Hg_
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In._
/
I/,
'/
Point
Clock 1 Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in H^O
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Irr.pinger
Te^p
Stock
Press
Stack
Tc"?
O r-
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
ju..
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: £_<
Ambient temperature: %t
H20
Volume after sampling 3o'ml Container
Ether-chloroform extraction
of 1mP1.n9cr water - 4,7 - *g
juiipmyer preniiea wttn ZfCKxnii
Volume collected * /3ml
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
extra HU.
^M
Container No.j^
Extra No.
Container flo. ,
Extra No.
Container No.^
Extra No.
MVHBIW
Impinger water residue
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: J_
Run number:
Operator:
Plant:
Sample box number
r A
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:__
Ambient temperature:
Impinger f^O
Volume after sampling 3&Om\ Container No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
of Impinger water
impmyer preiiiiea wi in jyecm\
Volume collected Z^ml
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
extra NO.
Container \
Extra No.
Container \
Extra No.
Container ^
Extra Mo.
Impinger water residue 7%.^
Weight results /7. o
Jo. _
Weight results
Weight results ^3^" s"
-
mg
mg
mg
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container
(D P V 3 <-T2J
c
Filter number Container no.
Filter particulate
weight _ ;a.r-7.9 nig
particulate weight
0\ .
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: /
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: . 1. p 2. 3._
Moisture total j7. ^ gm
4.
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
0-28
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: £_
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature: .
/V '-
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled wi
Volume collected 5 ml
Container
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~'of 1mP1n9er
Impinger water residue
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No,_
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra tlo.
Weight results
Filter particulate
weight
jng
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
- \ _ __ _ .
mg
particulate weight
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: /ft. I
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: .- 1. $ 2,
3.
4.
Moisture total
gm
Sample number:_
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-29
-------
Date: &
Run number:
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
- i * <&
Plant: * A
Sample box numberr ^2._
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
Volume after sampling '
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected
.**
ml
ml
ml
Container No.
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of 1mP1n9er water 0
Impinger water residue^
Implncjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No
Extra No.
Weight results_
_mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results_
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No.
Extra flo.
Weight results_
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
participate weiqht
Filter particulate
weight ;&9.
9,
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: . 1 .
3.
Moisture total jj~. v gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-30
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
Sample box number:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Location of sample port: n^.tfr^.*-
Barometric pressure: 3$. 9
Ambient temperature: iTe*F
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling "3 r|*/m1
Impinger prefilled withy&? ml
~ ~f
Volume collected - w ml
Container
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger water />
Impinger water residue
mg
Impincjers and bagk half of
filter, aceton6 wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container Nos
Extra No.
Height results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra !lo.
Weight results
Filteripartijeulate
weight :
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
Total particulate weight
, 3 mg
/» , o
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: >- 1
Moisture tital_//f£__gm
3.
4.
Sample number:
Method determination
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-31
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
' Plant:
Run number: £Jh{£^f~ 3
Operator: ff{j£f^
Sample box number: / 0
Impinger H£0
Volume after sampling ml
Impinger prefilled withH^ml
Volume collected "" ml
Impingers and back. half of
filter, acetone wash:
'
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Location of sample port: QrwTtoa.) M~)^\
j
I ; Filter paniculate
| weight 1^^9. ^ i"9
particulate weight
n f^Jf
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Height before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: .1.
,0
.»
Moisture total yo-o gm
2.
3.
;-Sample number;
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-32
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant;'
Sample box number:
fs/jF'~r~ Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:_
Ambient temperature:_
Implnger
Volume after sampling ^o(/ ml
Impinger prefilled with 4(93 ml
Volume collected f If ml
Container
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger water_ a.
Impinger water residue
_»9
_mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
jng
Dry probe and cyclone catch: Container
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No
Extra Mo.
Weight results
o.
\
|
. Filter particulate
weight
mg
Filter Papji^ aM.Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number CUIlKlh'wTr^no. Filter number Container no.
particulate weight
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: J
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: -. 1. 2.
3.
Moisture total
Sample number:
Method determination.^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-33
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: /W/.V/lT-
Run number: Si" 7r J~. /
Operator: fi-v
Impinger water residue ^3 //
Weight results ?,/
. «
NoT
Weight results * r
v\ Weight results *$/
.
»g
mg
mg
mg
mg
. .. . _ T-
Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
"
weight I^3oi'r-
fotaT parti cul ate weight Pfr^e-, ^r,!W SS.5,^
~n>^rt>i, " ' ' 5^94 *L
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: 3,0?. 7
Weight before test: [tfS
Moisture weight collected: 25.3-
number;. 1. 2.
Moisture total
3.
sanjpl
c number;
Analyze for:
Method
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP
/V &
' "
Date: *//fr//^-
Run number: $H'£ ~ '2-
Operator: t?&6-
Sample box number: .^
Impinger HgO
Volume after sampling ^^"2 ml
Impinger prefilled withj^Qnl
Volume collected -" ^ ml
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Filter Papers and Dry
Filter number Container no.
/ '00 0 £ ±~
Weight results
Weight results M3.V
* v-'::
'"...
mg
mg
mg
mg
Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
weight i ?*%£'
mg
Total particulate weight _D£1±& i"9
~Je>T/fl- > PJUU Cvd6VC< PjJtev 2 2iS$- i
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: .1.
Moisture total J7, 2-
2,
3.
4.
Sample number:
Method determination.^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-35
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: '2//S/72.
\ Run number: -f^/T^-^
Operator: p^er-.? 9
Sample box number: 2.
Plant:' I/ '£, /?£//~^&]/fel- /ff"9^*O
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected: 17,7
Container number: . - 1
Moisture total >7.7
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments:
' 3
Analyze for:
D-36
-------
Date;
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant;
H
Run number:
Operator: _ _
box number: /f/T'C
Sample
6
Location of sample port: 5* */Th
Barometric pressure:
Ambient tenperature:__
&e>
Impinger
Volume after sampling ₯
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments:
"- 14
Analyze for:
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling
Implnger prefilled w1 th
Volume collected
Container No.fr.TEr-) Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No. ~ of Implnger water *
ml Implnger water residue '
fflg
Implngers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No.
Extra Mo.
Weight results
jng
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
goo 11 ^ °< ./ 75~r!'
i
Filter particulate
weight M"?.4
Totfrh particulate weight
mg
/
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected: 7.1
Container number: . : 1. 2,
3.
Moisture total
; gm
I Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
0-38
-------
Pate;
Run number: /fTf?"
Operator: Ifl/f/a
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant;
A-ZXTbuta
f^
Sample box number: _ y
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
f
Implnger
Volume after sampling ly^ nil Container No,£rj££.*- Ether-chloroform extraction
Implnger prefllled wlth^^jnl Extra No. _ ~ of 1mP1n9er water - *^_J*
Volume corffeted fl ml Implnger water residue 'a mg
Impintjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra ^
We1ght resu1ts
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
Container No.
V.e19ht results
7.*
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
I
particulate weight
Filter particulate
weight _ 2t.(. mg
mg
-ffTA-L
Silica Gel
Weight after test: / ?°. '
Weight before test: //£ ^
Moisture v;eight collected: 5.9
Container number: . - 1. 2.
3.
4.
Moisture total 5*. 9 gn»
Sample number; ffT£~1'
Method determination:
Comments :
Analyze for:
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure;
-------
7
ARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number: /^S^5" j
Operator:
Sample box number: ^ 2,
Plant: T67T,.. /?^/?7Ab/;/a *a^
Location of sample port: o^rkkbe* «^ka
Barometric pressure: J?9. ;*
Ambient temperature: jr*V
t
|y- 9?.$^
«g
rag
mg
mg
mg
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
/Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: .1.
Moisture total 4,*' gm
2.
3.
4.
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D.-41
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: 3 -.#
Run rarnitfer: /-)-::
I. .'
Operator:
Sample box number:
Plant;
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
u i>Wt-
.39.
Implnger
Volume after sampling
Container No.J^i Ether-chloroform extraction
of Impinger water
iiiipiiiyer preniieu wi \.n^yo mi
Volume collected o o ml
./"
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,-
acetone wash:
extra HO.
Container h
Extra No.
Container ^
Extra No.
Container fi
Extra tlo:
Implnger water residue /t?
lo.#5/T-^
Weight results >^-
Weight results
lo.^£r.v
Weight results 7?-^
^ '
ng
mg
mg
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
weight
Filter particulate
we 1 gh t 3_._3: mg
. fro V mg
Jet-
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
's Container number:
Moisture total
gm
2.
3.
4.
Sample number;
Method determination:
\ 4tomments;
Analyze for:
0^42
-------
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Run number: ^9^ £ -
Operator:
Sample box number:
v 2.
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
ml
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected f> ml
Container No
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of 1"P1."9er water - M'l »
Impinger water residue
».~? mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No>
Me1ght resu1ts
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch: Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
Container
Extra ««
Weight results
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
"
I
particulate weight
Filter particulate
weight ^/' V mg
v 73.? mg
PR
J a J, 14
Silica Gel
Weight after test: /<ȣ,*
Weight before test: f&1,8
Moisture weight collected: j 6 ^
Container number: 1. 2.
3.
4.
Moisture total jt,i gm
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments: __
Analyze for:
D-43
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA I4*j -
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS^fe "ZW?
and record at the start of each^A-
... point or, if single point
^. safflpling, read and record every 5
!»*2B'Hiutes.
4s
Sapple Box No. V
:er Box No.
P^obe Length _
ieatsr Setting _S O ^6
.)'-
4.*$
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture
Heater Oox Setting, °F 2
Probe Tip Dia.
la..'In. :fe*', /flT
-------
\
X3
i
H
Point
S7Z/7~
tr-f
-2
-3
-V
-5"
-^
j&fctf
'
.
. .
Clock
TiK3
y:r/s~^
y
A**, ir
G/7, to (a
0/4. Zd
.
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
^*£- ^
*fl?>
.a/
>«0
^/
tOt>
ib£
Orifice
in Ho
De-si red "
//o
A°
/^o
//«?
//0
AO
.
AH
0
Actual
/.o
Afl
A3
/,0
s,o
/,Q
1
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
S4
_^
^^ Jt?
^^5 ^^
cS
&?
81
Temp.
Outlet
7Z
7X
7V
7^
7^'
76
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
V
y
V
V
/
4/
^r
Stack
Tc"?
op
yS*3"
/7o
/v^r
>/£D
?fi
^V
. .
k
Cocments:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
^kCO .0,0,
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS%#, 2O
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point /Xu _
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No.
Location //<9/3 7>/
Dste
-2/23/7^
Sample Box Ho.
P&ter Box No. _
Probe Length
Operator /?./^'l /.''' ><< /#.'',&?'-'*<£>* Probe Heater Setting
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In._
°F
3/^6
-------
Point
sT*»r
£>-/
-z.
1 -3
-«/
-^
<-£
Pmjcf
,
I
i
1
'
i
i
i
Clock
lisa
)£>£> t-
IOOS
/oc S*
JOJl
/0 /
.
..
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
V% / ^J.
&*TQ,££ Z..5&
05*V, /7
<»3T, fi£*
ti£7tG*-/
tOS^i. i 3
"
'
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
y^3 /
/^/
.OO
tOt
,01
o2
Orifice
in H0
Desired '
//6i
lef>
1.0
A 6
/,£>
/-o
.
,
.
0
Actual
//O
/.tf
)t£
/, o
/. ^
/>&
t
Dry Gas
°F
inlet
#0
<£?<3
S2.
fS
6'9
6^
Pump
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
V
V
y
y
V
^/
,
Box
Ter.p .
°F
*i5e
\/
Impinger
°F
^^
5"^J
Jb
J"0
.5"D
^"O
Stack
Press
in. Hq
2^*^?
1
/
f
/
NK
Stack-
Tcr=:?
OF
/7S
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
?lant_
Run Nc
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN. ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and. record every 5
minutes. .
S£?.pl s Box No.
Meter Box No,
Probe Length
....-
-------
Point
$TA+T.
&~ t
-2~
-3
- V
'" S~
£
£»Jet
\
\
i
1
i
«
_
i
i
i
Clock
TlKS
/
/327
I _j^«/
X32.7
_
/33J
/,} 3<>
AS 39
.
Dry Gas
I-ister, CF
5?« . / 9
o^/. 4 7
A 73 » ^ fi
&*}£'» 36
<3^7, 09
fi9^. 7?
J 0Q, £*£)
'
Pi tot
in. HgO
AP
f 0 Z
j
//O
1,6
AO
.
Dry Gns
°F
Inlet
<&S"
ff&
8&
$3
»9
s&
Temp.
Outlet
"7 1
72-
73
7^ "
"7*t
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
4/
V
i/
₯
y
Box
Torr.p.
°F
^.<5d
M/
Impinger
°F
^15"
S~£~
ST
sy
JT^*
ff
Stock
Press
in. ::?
"24 ^^
/
/
V
.
Stcck
Ten:?
°F
.
/
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PUnt_
Run No. r\ UJ /f"~
Locati en
Dcte
Operator
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJW.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Srapla Box No.
Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
, 6
Assumed Moisture % 3
*T
Prcba Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In._
Point
!r
fr
Clock
Tirr.a
Dry Gas
Kater, CF
Pi tot
in.
AR
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "i Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet Outlet
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Tcrr.p.
°F
Irr.pinger
Temp
°r
'- ~ ^\,
LUv/C
Press
in. Hg
S* ** **!*
taCK
°F
A~l '
A->~ I
l-l
1.6
A
I,
. 3
-70
100
F-A
1.J5
AT
6 o
-3L-V
a.:?
) OQ
/M3-7
d-1 I
2^_
-U£L
7 .
"76
1.0--
"70
70
c-i i
TX
C-fe
a, 3
7 r
C-b
l . 75-
)r ft*/ I
x,/
JO
. i^i i./'T
-\.t> I
c - a I
i ! /r i^ L
IM.
-------
Poin
Clock
TlKS
Dry Gzs
Keter, CF
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
InletI Outlet
Pump >
Vacuum
In. Kg
Gouge
Box
Temp.
F
Impinger
°F
Stack
Press
in. rig
Stack
Ten-p
-fcO
J±£-
A-2
"55"
#
it .0
'Comments:
-37-(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. ^-.- -- -<
\
Run No. HW If ~
Location T
Dcte
Box No.
Box No. G%
r~'
Probe Length >
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Oparator*
Probe Haatar Setting
Assumed Moisture %_
Heater Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In..
Point
^ A-7
Clock
Tirr.s
Dry Gas
Mater, CF
Pi tot
in.
AP
Orifice AH
in H00
Dos i red
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet Outlet
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Te.rp.
°F
Impinger
°F
*- -/-I,
cu^K
Prass
in. Hg
Stack
Ten:?
°
TI
-.71
. to
<
f.o
^4
/.
06
! a.
i
n
/.
JL
a -i !
7.0
i.
ill
/-7T
;r :
c-
I y^7
v?>a !
-------
ij
ii
1
i
t
1 1
K.
.
Point
Tfc/»r
D-l
n-Tu
Clock
lira
°irar
»l*-7
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
*!>/fe.^
^ x ,3L*
/Or»t> ^^3Le>. 5i&
0-3, iot>~} ill */
n-*/
D-f
o-i
J5waL-
'°^4
!&>**
tnl%
i
Pi tot
in. H20
Ap
/./
),«
Lfy
?7^o«i *.r
nxra%
^SLI. a*?
l<*\
/''
i
i
i
>
»
-
I
i
Orifice AH
in H00
Desired "
/. r
i-d>
n,/r
i,^
/.*?
/.r
Actual
/. «T
Dry Gas Tenip.
op
Inlet
°ir
JL'0 ^C'
^-/r i *r
^-0
>^«
>.r
f r
4«r
:'*lf
j
i
1
1
-
Outlet
«
e
i
O
Q
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
*?*c?
°l*to
0 \ /O'O
I*
<*
e
96
i
t
i
i
i
1
*,o
?-r
- >>»
'
-^ .
Box
Terr.p.
op
^^
>
t
Ircpinger
Tc^p
°F
^5
\1
Stcck
Prass
in. ncj
79,
\
Stack
Ter,:p
op
-tff
b
-
/tfr
/xr
//d
I/O
n&
I9o
b
t
i
Comments:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
f
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Run No.
Location
Date
fr "
Opsrator _^
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJfl.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
6.
0.0
0
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture * 3
Probe Heater Setting
Hecter Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In.
-
jl?T-
Dry Gas Temp
op
Actual | Inlet I Outlet
TV
Pu^ip
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Te.rp .
°F
Irr.pinger
°F
Stcck
Press
in. Hg
Stack
Terr.p
°F
Tfeg>
p/ ,J1
A-l
.-r
i/
A-^I
1 .
A r
33
ll .0
V/.
7
6
/x
i./r
to. to
/oo
. ?
-
lot
Jit)
i c > r
11
IDT
^ff
6*7 .TO
kr/r
ii,r
S/o \
^9.
/.
/
K^^
3,76.6
X3_2O-
ii 30
o ~
. 0
£
?/!? !
-i
7r^"
IE
^4
J_^_
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTI CULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
6,
Plant &t% .
Run No.
SH -
Location A/fu^..^/
Date
&l&h
Oparator ^T** ju
Point
Clock
Tirse
3 S?#PT \c£C /
1 ^* I'l i ^' u" ' **~' 't~ ' "i
. 9V
? /M -r?
- i ' -i" 7
- 3 o<3oo
Pi tot
in. F.20
Ap
, ^"L
.3V
, ^7
/ 3?
- c' p 3 , «/<>
r
- £>
c7/V*7
Of,
.o_5_ __ ._ -
O^ I Z-
/?- ' ! / V"
yo
.,. _._t/^l
, 2"£
.3 +
! - v / ? . U ^
- ", z/ »vr
~
Orifice AH Dry Gas Temp.
in H00 °F
De-sired " Actual Inlet
,-?& .1C, 38
, W ,*/"*' 'J t>
Outlet
3^>
U-O
A/£ , //^ */ o yd
v 7 >y~) </ y u o
, S& f i" 0 tf-&
f j"3 , z~b V 9
} ts*> v....t.^n>. ^y.^
,76 , ^4 J"4
, ^ » V V
,^ *iT> 6^
y a
to
₯0.
4/7.
t/y
'" ^^"^4.
ff> 0? ^-e>*7
/)5 -^9?
Bar. Press. "Hg
Z9.64
Assumed Moisture £ /
Heater Box Setting, '
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Pumo
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
'r V
// i"
C 'd
2' 3
Box
Te.rp.
°F
3^0
^ .
Impir.ger
Temp
°F
Q d
Z-,0 \
~i"O
/, y
2-.i>
*/6 2-'^
t/#
_
,,_2-r_ .5? 1791 fe*' t 4-S^~
, 3 jf
! - ? *f ) i i -/"
- »/
1
>^tj , 10
y "> i */
^e>
. »/9
- -... - -
i
. r3 y i~3 d y
, t^2 , H 3 ^
, /^ ,/9 tc
L 4"Z-
i~2
i"2
2, i>>
Z.<9
^ ;
^ it . i"^ 62
i"t>'
1.0\
2,0
>p 2S~D
?" ./^7/'
6^
Stcck
Press
in. riq
Z
f£*) \
.
I
i
J'
?<>
TO
10
7^ i
*** \
ff>
60
*f 0
5"f?_
i
1
-------
,
1
i 1
0
i
i
1
Point
5rf&T
D-l
-I
3
-U
-i"
*".£
/?«/(
eLk?, "2'2
, 3*^
1
I
.
i
.1
.
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
^S-j"
. 65~
_...-
.07
.39
«...
1
I
1
i
-
'
1
Actual
,. \^T
. O£~~
~^-
Dry Gas Temp.
op
inlet
6&
&o
.07
39
_
J"V
i"V
-
Outlet
^t
-fV'
_
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
*>o
/»i"
- --
A~V^
a"7 2*
"
.1
, I
- .- , . .'
j
//si"
i. o
_.
0
.
, ,
I
Box
Ter.p .
°F
^
^
Ti
f
Ip.pinger
Tcr^p
°F
5f
i
1
"" /
1
1 .
V
Stack
Press
in. Hn
Stcck
Ten-?
*F
^4fSi&m:**te*
ll ?O
1 " '
1
V
JT>
Vtf
4^6
t
i
'
t
f
1
Comments:
.\'CAP-37'( 12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
Run No.
Location
Date
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILLJN.ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture % 2-
r-
I Oparator r
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Dia., In.
-------
'
1
g
: . .
Po-int
-STJfrVT
D-t
-1
1 -3
-t/
-. v""
-I
t-JHQi
Clock
Tiisa
J3 Z'l
i|
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
2^ oitf/-r
3Z
3 i" ox;
32
^.|
i
i
_
3 OfiJfV
1
. i
"
.
Pi tot
in. H£0
AP
.»?
*O(>
.&*
oes
. ,jjf 7""
.^T
. ^7
Orifice AH
in H00
Desired "
.70
. l3
-
. l£~
1 > 6"^
if * **"
Actual
.1^
,ao
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet Outlet
6*
&&
&C
£.£
i "~"
,XA"
>/ 0*2
f » 07^
Lo
ki-
&2-
j
1
\
1
-
t
.
!
i i
i i
. . .
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
3.0
1,0
- 1
.£""&
n?
,/y
y 'i""
2. 0
£L, o
Box
Te.-rp.
Op
Igb*
i
1
!
5
.
»
.
i
i
" ' » !
Inpinger
op
'4,-a
Stcck
Press
in. rig
j2^4^
Stock
Ten:?
«P&
^o
...
~
1
1
£o
-ITb
fQ
. i
i
i
1
Comments :
JiCAP-37- (12/67)
-------
ARTICULATE FJELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT -^FJLLJN-ALL^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Ssnsple Box No. 3
Meter Box No. V
Probe Length
Prcba Heater Setting
Ambient Temp *F
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture *__
Hester Box Setting,
Probe Tip Dia., In.
Point
Clock
Tia:a
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
Pi tot
in. H-20
A?
Orifics AH
in H00
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet 1 Outlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Ter.p.
°F
Irr.pinger
°F
Stcck
Press
in. Hg
Stack
Tesp
op
" JU! I <
31 lit i
J.&e
A £ 6
3.
a^-i
Mo
, oo
Co
I-I.O
<>
St,(sO
a,/ o
Jo
Slo
; 5 »
. 60
70.
HO
33
/,
24-
a . »,
#0
fo I
99 . 3 o
3.50
.To
. o
/ o
0
C.-0
T o
, q o
9 , t~l t>
(.0
33
-
, 0
To
3-S#
ti>e>
To
3 9
!'!': g- '
JLJS_
So
ffv
21
I L
22.
_2&
3,00
oo
Its
fo
STflffl-
2k-
J-
oo
I A 6
91
y
SL/
-------
o
1
o
J
1
1
^-t'1
Point
//
j(/
.27
?J
£?A/rJ
₯
.
"
-
""
^ Clock
Tir::a
1 » T/>7
,' >"/ /? ^T
I /y ; ,2 Sr
\ J.T.' * 1
. '
.
.
' '
- -
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
9^^, / o
°Hi<3 , 3u
9iTo ,j,-O
°t 5"y . i'SJ
--,
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
J.
. -*
-
0
Actual
.a . o c
'}>.& 0
5i ff 0
1 i~7 0
.
-
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
a6
9&
/ v'
<^\ rf'
-
Temp.
Outlet
-.|0
7 1-
j>C
7 ^_
..
Pu?ip
Vacuum
In., rig
Gouge
/.'. , .0
//, a
//, <3
if , 0
, /
'
Box
Temp.
op
i ; <
!
Impir.ger
°F
To»'"
$»
f s
,S" iT
..
-
.
'
Press
in. :--!f!
29. S*
I
/
\|/
.
Stock
Ten:?
°F
s^r
^ Of"
// V
»
\
1 . .
: S
;-:
* J
"
*
Coraaents:
NCAP-37'{12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
e> a .-.-
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN. ALL BLANKS
1 ' ' i
/* ./ .';'-' ~\:- .. ;
PI ant /rSJ: T/: £ >j j & "f / 3
Run No.
5/.»»-^
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box Flo. .5
1 f* *
Location J^- ^.^ #t?3 £#&i*4jfi" Meter Box No. ./
Dite _£
Operate
:: Point
2-*^3-?2- Probe Length j-'1
* _ i/>1 c 9 "9 . 4 £" ) i 7 o
\ H v
\ 27
S>oo
^<5 ,' 29 97'*, C1 , a ? '
' 5fWT I«Q- J3 cl<^> "2.7
3lfiQ- W 9# c.
f, y«
Orifice -AH , Dry Gas Temp.
in H*0 °F
Desired "Actual Inlet \ Outlet
."'-.; ' '-.,.. ' ' . '
/, 7 o . /,-?. a" So,
,5. c e gf -, ) &tf
j? . o o s , o tf 6 r<
J 'A o ^ .? c ? v
0 & ft *H o 0 7 /
5"O
x.y~* £.
^??/t - 7.0
^ - ^4-^
Ambient Te
Bar. Press
Assumed Ho
Heater Cox
Probe Tip
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
«r0 /;, >"
vS'tf
y^
S<-f
Sf
3.03 £.cii 7%
2 . V C 1 "'. - £ i £.t
^ if
rt,
5, t; r' " ' '5-=i/-s~ S«/ 1 57.
3't-f^ 3 ,11 AT 1 J? §'
3,3n 4'«''«s 5?S'
,QiCO £.,00 <?£>
ir.%
'""«-
bo
'.'..... . .!_
;, 3r /,^o 9^
,',7o J , 7o 9 i
j, Jv /; pf 9x
6Z
^j,.
^l_
5, o
S, o
£, 2.
S>e>
S'O
(fr0
(ri f,
£,£>
' 5,iT-
af, o
3. !T
/// 0
(-/ , e>
. .
Box
Temp .
°F
- - - -?
1 . -'j»
j< S /
\ '
L
7
mp °F >"^
. "Hg 1^t£<{
isture 2 3
Setting, «
Dia., In.
>F ^^
£/ //fV
~"7 ' .
Jp.pinger
Temp
°r
^"d)
y0
^T <5
\ 5- ^
Stock
Press
in. Hg
y&£$x
Stack
Tcr.:?
op
} 30
I 30
1 i 3o
.iTrf I 1
^° 1
iT'o
1 5-0 . I
: 1 .<>",>
*.*' C
y o
i S a
\
$1 c%: ij t 9 5^5? / -v (? i < i o ; . 70 h 7 & c, 975? i///x 1 > H c>
\ 5^j» 33
i r.."|CV-
i,'
'7? ?
f'9 <^ 991. M 5-- ' f ^^7
.--,:<-. 0(12.12-
c» > 99*/. 3t>
// 7^> // 70 93. ^«/
y, // f / ^ «,*" 92_-
:' . ' o ; . ?>; ,' T /.' C7v.
£V
b-l/
j
/
/
3»
?«T
3o
3 2.
31,
I2-
^ ^
HG
i
1 I -u*
^-p 1
To i
sfo
/j <" 1 s- 1
ij.'ff
H.*
/it/Q ) ' ~?C> /' '' -' ?2. 1 ^ '/ i V' ^ ' v
So
//^2
tf*-
\ ^°
Sf
I
^o -
.5 a
4>^
7 >
V fc^
-------
i
1
V
o
»3
Point
/s'
£.'
J7
3\
^W
W^*1 '
,_
'
. 1
i
.
.
' ;? PV
SDJ lA-
Clock
Tiisa
1 0 O ' > 0
7i v^>
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
,99%'. 5"o
/tfoe-.^
10 oi^m
/eon, $>f
'
/
Pitot
in. KgO
AP
) ,(o C
h (.0
) i y o
) ,U Q
-
1
Orifice
in Ho
De-si red
y ,9,5
/. 9a .
J,7o
1 .?>
.
AH
0
Actual
1, 9d
), 9&
// -jo
), ~>o
.
.
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
9SL
9 n
94
9^
Temp.
Outlet
{. 'L
u> *-'
(.1-
(#2-
'
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gougs
<", 0
5' o
y,-r
V.*
,
Box
Tor.p .
°F
py o
--
s~
Impir.ger
T£r;:p
°F
^"<3
x"
^
^'
S*. , ,.1.
LU^lS
Press
in. ;-!
-------
' Part 10, p. 4 of 8 .
/*£*
?1 ant jfefiffibtk.
Run No.
- 3
Location ^f &
Date ,3
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FJJ_LJN_,ALL_ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
a./ 7j?
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture %
Operator
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °
Probe Tip Dia., In.
^
Point
'
Clock
Tiis:e
Dry Gas
Mater, CF
Pi tot
in.
Ap
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired " Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
inlet Outlet
Pum?
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
Box
Tomp.
°F
Irr.pinger
Temp
°F
Stack
Press
in. rig
Stack
TG"?
°
J, 3f_ \
-.r
/a :
«*?
Al,
\ I
. ; */
. 10
J.6>0
,-rr
i t7
I a*-,
l.fO
(,0
3.3(0
fee
Jo
I i.nr
91,
, to
JTo
) ,
Soo
1, / o
1. 1f
too
/(,
fa
Jt*t°
>>7o
A&L.
^d!L
Wi>?
I >,*o I
r-r
JTo
So
Htf.at* \hvff
S.o
J.J1L.
l, 7t?
7t>
*,*
3 ',
/>3o
te*-
_Z£_
12.
n; ft
ti
22-
//* i
_2^_
.To
-------
'
. 1
1
o
2
i
i
/
Point
l$
Al
- a")
W
P*>/
"
.
"
Od'J-'^6^
-~3~fZp^'
Clock
TiKS
/-3; 3^
/ 3 ; vt
/ n ,' if s
) "3 .' 4 3
-
Pfr '"
DrySaas
Kater,- CF
^//, %tj
5(at zJJ
5*!? i 5 i*'
(ffO,1 (+
.3 '
Pi tot
in. KgO
AP
1,140
It ^Q
) i 3.0
)t £0
Orifice
in H^
Desired
y/-?^
A ->o
/ 1 "To
/..TO
AH
0
Actual
J,? c
J, 76
) ,^"a
// J>^<5
.
Dry Gas
°F
Inlet
>f> 2-
/D t
) 03^
1 o 2
.
Temp.
Outlet
70
?o
7o
7 o
-
.
'
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
i>~o
f.o
3* 0
s', z>
.
Box
Temp .
°F
£^~0
^.- '
s^
s
Impir.ger
Tcr.^p
°F
fo
3~£>
£~0
^o
Stcck
Press
in. Ho
29r^P
.
_
Stsck
Tc-p
>>iT
9$
98
JZe
1
i
1
Comments:
NCAP-37'(12/67)
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant1
' I
PARTICIPATE FIELD DATA
VERY IKPORTAKj" - FILL IN.AJL BLANKS °?e>Qt £#
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No.
Location
Date
f £-
Operator
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
A 7
Ambient Temp °F
/ 0
Bar. Press. "Hg *-
-2.
Assumed Moisture
/ I
'
Probe Heater Setting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip Oia., In.
Point
Clock
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in.
Ap
Orifice AH
in H^O
Desired
Actual
Dry Gas Temp.
Op
Inlet TOutlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gouge
sr
10
/ 2.
Iff
10
6*0
\.~10
10
.0
16
1.O
vj, 1
sr
rf~ ! ^ -r
_Ml
J.iT
1 t<*o£
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Uu>.
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - fJlLJjf.AU^ BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
PI ant /TV"
Run No.
/
f ^ *
^T
Location D
Dtte
Operate
Point
i^T/t^T
" »
n |
I 0.
s
V
£~
4
7
*/>
/
r /
)^^4\ ^i- ~~'^i*yF--
-r: ^ o
/- *" *
7 **iP t''' pf-^ *
V/or
1 '
K-M-v
«
Clock
90^
*)£>*%
^ i i
i
Dry Gas
Keter, CF
*I5LH . ^^
4x">. »l
^frj. 7_r>
<=l j <& |*| "-^ii _ 4f~Q
C3 X 5
*? ^*2
133
4 3^
* \ °i
q
/ '0
i 4^3
Pi tot
in. H.20
Ap
-"^)
^»*₯
. "^, A
'I^T.^S .*^*?
V H i * '^ */
*Y *1 *f . &S
v 'Y^/r
1 ^ T 1- & £
*7 jf% 4 5~5~, /*y
^
n \ *i
/ i.
'>£_ptAJ
/
f <*"
1 ^
» ^/ p
,37
*/ (7
.HI
,*//
. ^/3
I
1
1
i
l
III 1 IIU LCi .
/"N 'T ,^ j
SCT.pl e Box No. (?'*"' '
Keter Box No. p X-
x '
Probe Length ^ ' jPVf*^-
Probe Heater Sotting
Orifice AH
in H-,0
Desired
.
/- 1)
/ fr '
/. cr
K $* y
/.<??
/ - 6 5"
/ ,7 £?
/ ^6S~^
Actual
S^
Dry Gas Temp.
op
Inlet
^ ^
/ . i / ^ 5"
/ . ^ / ! 10
t. * r 7c»
/ Vft*
/ - j"
/ . 7 0
/^ 7 0 ', 7
/ ? 3
*^ *T"
» ? ^r^
s>a
"? "'
) ^
/ DC">
/i>£>
f frfy
/$*?
no
/ ,;-
t
i
j
Outlet
f 5"
? <"
£ -^
^ 5~
C?. «T"
f C
7^*"
L£>£
no
! .' \
&.-T
4 -
i
;
'
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plan
t/r STbi 4 V^Kp
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
(J
"S/'V
24.9
Run No.
Location
Date
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No. _Gj^ - ^
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg
Assumed Moisture % /
Operator
Prcbs Heater Sotting
Heater Box Setting, °F
Probe Tip 01 a.. In.
Point
Clock
Tijse
Dry Gas
Meter, CF
Pi tot
in. H.20
AP
Orifice AH
in HoO
Dry Gas Temp.
Desired
Actual
inlet FOutlet
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
Box
Temp.
°F
Ircpir.ger
Temp
°F
S£-.~J(
Press
in. Hg
Stack
T£"P
op
^
I lo
±53-
'°
i OG
7,0
/ HO
/$
/.
/
/.id
/of
/ 6. o
J4-2
no
l!
. HO
>Qo
/O
5J.6
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
Plant
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes.
Run No.
Locatien c^
Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
Ambient Temp °F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
Assumed Moisture % /»
Oparator
Hsatsr Setting
Heater Box Setting, *
Probe Tip 01 a.. In._V
Point
;
9 / M
$* "
! ." \
\
\
r
t
i
i
*.
i
*
i
Clock
lisa
/4VAo
/!>".' 30
)Si t*0
J*>. SO
J£toc
i/. lie
>L',$o
^*m
0
Dry Gas
Kater, CF
J00,tfiO
Jdfy.Si.
i/&', J'S
)l ?. UO
IZS, 36
)5o, t»^
}^,7^
^.,32.,-,
/
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
Ori f i ce
in Ho
Desired *
-- ~/
) >6 o
),0£>
) , t> e)
} , 00
J, £> 0
), *o
.
AH
0
Actual
'
). t o
J.e &&
.
-
Dry Gas
°F
inlet
,
/:*
72-
P«?
*o
$0
(y
(*0
bf
JO
?e
7t>
££33
..5??
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
,
jTs
y,^-"
(,.0
&.O
7.0
9.0
b>Z£
Box
Temp.
°F
/^>
1
!
i
\
\
^
Impinger
Tesp
°F
. '
£"0 ,
)
/
A*
\ .
*
.
Stcck
Press
in. rig
t -?;>#
..
Stsck
Te-.p
op
<^/o&
*
\
',
v
I
-------
Part 10, p. 4 of 8
PARTICULATE FIELD DATA
Plant
VERY IMPORTANT - FILL IN.ALL BLANKS
Read and record at the start of each
test point or, if single point
sampling, read and record every 5
minutes. .
Sample Box No.
Meter Box No.
Probe Length
M
Ambient Temp *F_
Bar. Press. "Hg_
l»sue^#$
Oparator
Probe Heater Setting
Assumed Moisture % jo
Heater Box Setting, °F_^
Probe Tip Dia., In.
\
1
\
1
[
t
j
1
i
i
.
.
Point
Clock
' \£>%'ifjr
> i y i 3 &
y y A 11
/CP O i 1 7 9 1 ) X
/ ' ."5 o i $
1*t \ 1 >
to i/t> )90 > I 0
ID ' S 0 / <
)l'.oo J
n:>o A..
«
9Z» / //
o5 , 51 ^
Pi tot
in. H20
AP
. . j
'^F- //
i
Orifice AH
in HoO
Desired "
.
J, f> 6
J. a o
) , 0 0
1,0 0
) i 0 0
f ,0 0
Actual
J i O O
Dry Gas Temp.
°F
Inlet
78
1, 0 0 I %4
l.oo 9o
/ i £> O
J , 0 3
/.CO
T
1.00
i , 0 0
) , £> O
/.Op
Jt CJ£L
l.o a
/..£> U
1, 00
1,00
).oo \ ).eo
/ ,60 \ /.ft)
j
!
,
1 *
li0O
?&
)0O
j QLJ
" '
?-
c« ^
^J ^
/ 01~
10 If
16L
tot.
I&f33
^
Outlet
rip
7 j
79
7 ft
%')-
%t[
tfffa
>* Os?
y6
^
^^>
5*6
£>6r
^/4
mi '
3.67
₯
Pump
Vacuum
In. Hg
Gauge
₯.0
f* o
. o
//. o
U, O
f i 0
y.A
a, o
V-^'
Jy, O
JT. «r-
^.-,c»
^£mm
Box
Temp.
°F
/&&
\i
7t>
/
V-
*?./£
Impinger
Tcxp
°F
5"a
/
'
Stack
Press
ir. . Hg
-X2- T ^,:.;
|
'
Stack
''F
*-/00
'
1
'.
f*
;*>
1
1
{
i/
*- Ih
+*J&&
|
!
-------
Date:
Run number: T \ ri H " /
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Sample box number:
=4-
Location of sample port: jy,
Barometric pressure:__
Ambient temperature:
Container No.^gyj-l Ether-chloroform extraction
ml Extra No. ^ of Impinger water __o mg
ml Impinger water residue /, 3 mg
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected **
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone v/ash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
]//^lJ"
Filter number CuuUiMi no. Filter number Container no.
0*61 D |J __
i
- I -- . - - -Filter particulate
_ I __ _ : __ _____ _ weight
particulate weight
a . 9
PR
arJovt
a ) . f
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No . xe)4~)
Extra Ho. Weight results
. , _ »
7JT. 7 mg
m9
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: .1.
/7." *J
2.
Moisture total
4.
Sample number:
Method determination:
Comments :
#~ t
Analyze for:
D-70
-------
lfat*y
M". PARTICULATE
Date: 2^ 5^72.
Run number: A/R H *+
Operator: AIw* \ C/tMtjA
Sample box number: " l4
Impinger ^0
Volume after sampling ^*t3ml
Impinger prefi lied with^^ml
Volume collected «»^ ml
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Filter Papers and Dry
Filter number Container no.
^ty ^3c 0»4y>^ t
~ "*^ i
i
.
'V
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
CLEANUP SHEET
*^^^**_ f\ 1
Plant: fi^Sl^ ff ^ K. &- ) J»
Location of sample port: flpdt $*& $& J
Barometric pressure: x^.^o
Ambient temperature: &****
No. J^^^ Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger water o
Impinger water residue 7,y
/
No.^f /r - **^
Weight results ^0.7
No''
Weight results
Weight results 3""fi*. o
' ii »
mg
mg
mg
mg
Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
weight /y*./
l£Etl particulate weight oi^>v. /
: tr
m^-i- n P^A-rAthis, f^^ ^5J. a,
mg
mg
w
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected: J/,LJ
Container number: . 1. 2.
Moisture total y;,y gtn
3.
4.
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-71
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
#- >3
Run number: jt/Mff **^
Operator^***
Sample box number: *j
.
^^ ' AM J^* "'
Location of sample port: ArJSf.
Barometric pressure: ,,25. J«
Ambient temperature: £"»*/*
' »»
i"
Impinger HgO
Volume after sampling «JE^pml
"*'*' ' AJ-4L
Impinger p refilled with^jflpml
Volume collected «*y ml
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Filter Papers and Dry
Filter number Container no.
^^ll? .^7*9 I
1
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra Ho.
No, A^j^3 Ether-chloroform extraction
'of Impinger water O
*-»..,. Impinger water residue >y/3
*. '
-''HelghTresults }3,y
Weight results
No.l/y/J-"^
Weight results Th'^
mg
mg
mg
mg
Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
weight jjrf'V
mg
Xrt&P particulate weight 4*9>t* mg
if t}'
f>ft- M (?R fye£»4a. 0 9l6fii JLSL7. 1
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected: 131-
Moisture total
Container number: . 1. 2.
Sample number: y^_T//- 3
__ 3. 4.
Analyze for: .
Method determination:
Comments :
D>72
\
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: A-/ ** . 1 ' *~
Run number: ^/Iv'W" **'
Operator: A-i/1*^^-
Sample box number: (&£"" 7^
.
Plant:' /7V>^yA tSpOKR^ Jt |
Location of sample port: jfadsti $&& l«.f.£:
Barometric pressure: ^f^c
Ambient temperature: s»*F
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling Q°l& ml
Impinger prefilled with^j-o ml
Volume collected "* (0 ml
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Filter Pape.rs and Dry
1
I
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra No.
Container
Extra Ho.
No.j^yjC/ Ether-chloroform extraction
^ of impinger water £,^/
Impinger water residue ^,$"
NO. Niji*-\
Weight results 4>-^
No'
Weight results
No.,Vi)rt* )
Weight results C*?-^
-
mg
mg
mg
. " '""
Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no.
weight ?O.A"
lulil particulate weight /J9. 7
Td
*Z/ /i ^l?
-------
Date:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Run number: |N UJ I"/"
Operator:
Sample box number: 0 JT ~
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:^
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling '\YAi ml
Implnger prefilled with *10Dtn\
Volume collected .^ ^ ml
Container
Extra No.
A
.^tf ri--v Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of 1mP1n9er water - o
Implnger water residue
mg
Implntjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
£xtra No<
We1ght results
, L mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
Container No
Extra Ho.
Weight results
J7.V mg
Filter Papers afo4< Dry Filter Parti cul ate
C^-^\ef^1
Filter number Containoi no. Filter number Container no.
I
Filter particulate
we i gh t 2AJ
particulate weight
5*?.
mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: ^LlL .
Weight before test: £E2JL
Moisture weight collected: __)«/>*
Container number: . - 1. 2.
3.
Moisture total ;«j». o gm
Sample number;
^^«
Method determination:
Comments :
Analyze for:
D-74
-------
Date:
Run number: /S ix fr "3
Operator: y^-y-^V'V'
Sample box number: iff ZT-
Implnger
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
2=,
_ Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure;
Ambient tenperature:_
Volume after sampling 39 ^ml Container No.
Impinger prefilled with^/ro ml Extra No.
Volume collected """.v ml
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of 1mP1n9er water - Q.
Impinger water residue_
"9
jag
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results^
nig
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Ho.
V/eight results
i
i
-\ mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
Filter particulate
weight __ 3/1
particulate weight
(,
-------
ARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number
Operator:
Sample box number:
Plant:
I*.
Location of sample port: £6 /x^
Barometric pressure: 39.9*
Ambient temperature; St> *
Impinger
Volume after sampling ^(yml
Impinger prefilled with//£0ml
Volume collected _-Vml
Container No. St£H~ * Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No.
of 1mPin9er water
Impinger water residue ), 7
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone v/ash:
Container No.
Extra No.
- j.
Weight results_
3.4 mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
V/eight results
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
j)articulate weight
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No.3«g//-z-
Extra flo. Weight results
_. ~ » '
*? # t mg
Filter
weight %Q^
_mg
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
Moisture total
2.
3.
4.
Sample number:__ t
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-76
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator: _
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Ja
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
vj/r i4~«~fc-
Impinger
Volume after sampling 3?/ ml
Impinger prefilled withj££_>_ml
Volume collected -6 ml
Container No..jfe'. I
Moisture weight collected: yi. )
Container number: . - 1. 2.
3.
Moisture total /»,/ gro
Sample number: S&ft-
Method determination:
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-77
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: ^_
Run number:
Operator:
If ~~ /
Sample box number:
Plant;
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled
Volume collected ) ^?m
Container Ho.
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of 1mP1n9er wate«" - iL3 - «9
Impinger water residue
mg
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container No .
Extra flo.
Weight results
75.0
jng
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
3 3 2^ /jjT 0*&-?7jT\
particulate weight
Filter particulate
we 1 ght /ptf.3 mg
)77>3 mg
?/.
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: j -7 7 , (#
Moisture weight collected: / 7. (
Container number: 1. 2.
Moisture total / 7> (* gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-78
-------
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
£-3.3 -7
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
i-} -
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling 5£V ml
Impinger prefi lied with^££_m]
Volume collected -/£ ml
Container
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of impinger water - o
Impinger water residue^
J»9
mg
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Ho.
Weight results
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
i !
o
particulate weight
. Filter particulate
weight
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: /7ft 4*
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: . 1.
2.
4.
Moisture total ts~> <4 ff"
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments t
Analyze for:
D-79
-------
Date: 3 -
Run number:
Operator: _
- 3
Sample box number:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure; 29.fr
Ambient temperature:
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling
Implnger prefilled
Volume collected
Container No. s*»rt-3 Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No. ~' of 1mp1nger water ^£_«9
o ml Implnger water residue £4.7 ag
Implncjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Ho.
Weight results
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
- Filter particulate
weight /.9.1
particulate weight
mg
?
17,7
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: 1.
2.
Moisture total
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-80
-------
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
Run number:
Operator:
-*- '"/;'
Sample box number:
/7
Location of sample port: _^
Barometric pressure; $g
Ambient temperature; ft,
Impinger
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled withVlpnl
Volume collected -~ \fy ml
Container No .
Extra No.
- 1 Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of Wnger- water - 0.J - *g
Impinger water residue e'.V ag
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results^
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra f!o.
Weight results
i
. Filter particulate
weight 39&~ a
particulate weight
.T36. o
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture v/eight collected:
Container number: . - 1.
/j££jT
2.
SV*. I
Moisture total
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Parti cul ate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
gm
Sample number:_
Method determination:.
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-81
-------
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: 2
Run number: (3_
Operator:
- "Z
Sample box number: (jJ~- I
Plant:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: ^9i
Ambient temperature: ft
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling 392 ml
Impinger prefilled \-nW/tr& ml
Volume collected - 5? ml
Container No..j(2_f]_r_-*-*Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No. of 1inPin9er water _ *,f mq
Impinger water residue
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container Ho.#flT- 3-
Extra No. Weight results_
nig
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Height results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
£ 3. <» mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter .number Container no. Filter number Container no.
? y _ O, 6= & I _ _
|
Filter particulate
weight
particulate weight
Qj
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected: ^7,3
Container number: 1. 2.
3.
4.
Moisture total )7,3 gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-82
-------
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
-- I 3
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
Location of sample port: T&L,
Barometric pressure:_
Ambient temperature:
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling
Impinger prefilled with 4100 m\
Volume collected -/-/y ml
Container Mo.#7£"-3 Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No.
of impinger water
mg
Impinger water residue_
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
9.2
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
nig
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
particulate weight
Filter particulate
weight Q7& ,t mg
f. if mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test: /93,6>
Moisture weight collected: J7.H
Container number: 1. 2.
3.
4.
Moisture total
gm
Sample number: _
Method determination^
Comments:
Analyze for:
D-83
-------
Date:
Run number: /?t(?£r-' J
Operator:
PARTICULATE CLEANUP SHEET
Plant:
(/
Sample box number:
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Impinger H20
Volume after sampling 40 / ml
Impinger prefilled with 4^ ml
Volume collected "V ] ml
Container No.
Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
~ of 1mP1n9er water - 2 - »
Impinger water residue^
_mg
Impintjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No.flSg-1
Extra No. - Weight results_
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No.
Extra No.
Weight results_
jng
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra Ho.
Weight results
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
1 particulate weight
Filter particulate
weight ~?i. *f rog
??» J mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test: 106."7
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: . 1. 2.
4.
Moisture total
T) gm
Sample number:
Method determination^
Comments;
Analyze for:
D-84
-------
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date: £_
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number: -
Plant:
_ Location of sample port: $' ^
Barometric pressure:
Ambient temperature:
Implnger H20
Volume after sampling
Implnger prefllled
Volume collected
ml Container No.
ml Extra No.
Ether-chloroform extraction
'of Impinger water o mg
Implnger water residue 'o «g
Impincjers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No,
Extra No.
Weight results
mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra flo.
Weight results_
mg
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Participate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
I
\
- Filter particulate
weight _ 3sr>
articulate weight
3
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture weight collected:
Container number: . 1.
3.
4.
Moisture total J3. i 9»"
Sample number:_
Method determination:.
Comments;
Analyze for:
0-85
-------
PARTICIPATE CLEANUP SHEET
Date:
Run number:
Operator:
Sample box number:
Plant: &
Location of sample port:
Barometric pressure: ^
Ambient temperature: <
Impinger
Volume after sampling 3$$ ml
Impinger prefilled with^g ml
Volume collected _y2ml
.Container Noffif-? Ether-chloroform extraction
Extra No. ' of 1mPin9.er water
Impinger water residue
jng
mg
Impingers and back half of
filter, acetone wash:
Container No
Extra No.
Weight results_
mg
Dry probe and cyclone catch:
Container No._
Extra No.
Weight results
_mg
Probe, cyclone, flask, and
front half of filter,
acetone wash:
Container
Extra No.
Weight results_
Filter Papers and Dry Filter Particulate
Filter number Container no. Filter number Container no.
Filter particulate
weight
particulate weight
mg
Silica Gel
Weight after test:
Weight before test:
Moisture v/eight collected:
Container number: 1.
3.
Moisture total )
-------
APPENDIX E
STANDARD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
-------
15708
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
Subparl EStandards of Perform-
ance for Nitric Acid Plants
§ 466.50 Applicability and designation
of affected facility
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to nitric acid plants.
(b) For purposes of 5 466.11 (e), the
entire plant is the affected facility.
§ 466.51 Definitions.
As u.ed in this part, all terms not- de-
nned herein shall have the meaning given
them in the Act:
(a) "Nitric acid plant" means any
facility producing weak nitric acid by
either the pressure or atmospheric pres-
sure process.
(b) "Weak nitric acid" means acid
which is 50 to 70 percent in strength.
§ 466.52 Standard for nitrogen oxides.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of nitrogen
oxides in the effluent which are:
(a) In excess of 3 Ibs. per ton of acid
produced (1.5 Kgm. per metric ton),
maximum 2-hour average, expressed as
NO.
(b) A visible .emission within the
meaning of this part.
§ 466.53 Emission monitoring.
(a) There shall be Installed, cali-
brated, maintained, and operated, in any
nitric acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart, an instrument for con-
tinuously monitoring and recording
emissions of nitrogen oxides.
(b) The Instrument installed and used.
pursuant to this section shall have a
confidence level of at least 95 percent and
be accurate within ±20 percent and ?hall
be calibrated Jn accordance will: the
method(s) prescribed by the manuiac-
turer(s) of such instrument; the instru-
ment shall be calibrated at least once
per year unless the manufacturer(s)
specifies or recommends calibration at
shorter intervals, in which case such
specifications or recommendations shall
be followed.
(c) The owner or operator of any
nitric acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall maintain a file of all
measurements required by this subpart
and shall retain the record of any such
measurement for at least 1 year follow-
ing the date of such measurement.
§ 466.54 Test methods and procedures.
(a) The provisions of this section are
applicable to performance tests for deter-
mining emissions of nitrogen oxides from
nitric acid plants.
(b) All performance tests shall be con-
ducted while the affected facility is
operating at or above the acid product
rate for which such facility was designed.
(c) Test methods set forth in the ap-
pendix to this part shall be used as
follows:
(1) For each repetition the NO. con-
centration shall be determined by using
Method 7. The sampling location shall be
selected according to Method 1 and the
sampling point shall be the centroid of
the stack or duct. The sampling time
shall be 2 hours and four samples shall
be taken during each 2-hour period.
(2) The volumetric flow rate of the
total effluent shall be determined by us-
ing Method 2 and traversing according
to Method 1. Gas analysis shall be per-
formed by Method 3, and moisture con-
tent shall be determined by Method 4.
(d) Acid produced, expressed in tons
per hour of 100 percent weak nitric acid,
'shall be determined during each 2-hour
testing period by suitable flow meters and
shall be confirmed by a material balance
over the production system.
(e) For each repetition, nitrogen ox-
Ides emissions, expressed in Ib./ton of
weak nitric acid, shall be determined by
dividing the emission rate in Ib./hr. by
the acid produced. The emission rate
shall be determined by the equation, lb./
hr.=QxC, where Q=volumetric flow
rate of the effluent in f t.'/hr. at standard
conditions, dry basis, as determined in
accordance with J 466.54(d) (2). and
C=NO« concentration in Ib./f t.*, as deter-
mined in accordance with 5 466.54 (d) (1),
corrected to standard conditions, dry
basis.
Subpart FStandards of Perform-
ance for Sulfuric Acid Plants
§ 466.60 Applicability and designation
of affected facility.
(a) The provisions of this subpart are
applicable to sulfur acid plants.
(b) For purposes of § 466.11 (e) the en-
tire plant is the affected facility.
§ 466.61 Definitions.
As used in this part, all terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning
given them in the Act:
(a) "Sulfuric acid plant" means any
facility producing sulfuric acid by the
contact process by burning elemental sul-
fur, alkylation acid, hydrogen sulflde,
organic sulfides and mercaptans, or acid
sludge.
(b) "Acid mist" means sulfur acid mist,
as measured by test methods set forth
in this part.
§ 466.62 Standard for sulfur dioxide.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of sulfur di-
oxide in the effluent in excess of 4 Ibs.
per ton of acid produced (2 kgm. per
metric ton), maximum 2-hour average.
§ 466.63 Standard for acid mist.
No person subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall cause or allow the dis-
charge into the atmosphere of acid mist
in the effluent which is:
(a) In excess of 0.15 lb. per ton of acid
produced (0.075 Kgm. per metric ton),
maximum 2-hour average, expressed as
H:SO,.
(b) A visible emission within the
meaning of this part.
§ 466.64 Emission monitoring.
(a) There shall be installed, calibrated,
maintained, and operated, in any r>^f:uic
acid plant subject to the provisions of
this subpart, an instrument for continu-
ously monitoiing and recording emis-
sions of sulfur dioxide.
(b) The instrument installed and used
pursuant to this section shall have a con-
fidence level of at least 95 percent and be
accurate within ±20 percent end shall
be calibrated in accordance with the
method (s) prescribed by the manufac-
turer^) of such instrument, the instru-
ment shall be calibrated at least once per
year unless the manufacturer (s) speci-
fies or recommends calibration at shorter
intervals, in which case such specifica-
tions or recommendations shall be fol-
lowed.
(c) The owner or operator of any sul-
furic acid plant subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall maintain a file of
all measurements required by this sub-
part and shall retain the record of any
such measurement for at least 1 year
following the date of such measurement.
§ 466.65 Test methods and procedures.
(a) The provisions of this section are
applicable to performance tests for de-
termining emissions of acid mist and sul-
fur dioxide from sulfuric acid plants.
(b) All performance tests shall be con-
ducted while the affected facility is op-
erating at or above the acid production
rate for which such facility was designed.
(c) Test methods set forth in the
appendix to this part shall be used as
follows:
(1) For each repetition the acid mist
and SOt concentrations shall be deter-
mined by using Method 8 and traversing
according to Method 1. The sampling
time shall be 2 hours, and sampling vol-
ume shall be 40 ft.1 corrected to standard
conditions.
(2) The volumetric flow rate of the
total effluent shall be determined by us-
ing Method 2 and traversing according
to Method 1. Gas analysis shall be per-
formed by Method 3. Moisture content
can be considered to be zero.
(d) Acid produced, expressed in tons
per hour of 100 percent sulfuric acid
shall be determined during each 2-hour
testing period by suitable flow meters
and shall be confirmed by a material
balance over the production system.
(e) For each repetition, acid mist and
sulfur dioxide emissions, expressed in
Ib./ton of sulfuric acid shall be deter-
mined by dividing the emission rate in
Ib./hr. by the acid produced. The emis-
sion rate shall be determined by the
equation, lb./hr.=QxC, where Q=volu-
metric flow rate of the effluent in ft.'/hr.
at standard conditions, dry basis, as de-
termined in accordance with § 466.65(d)
(2), and C=acid mist and SO, concen-
trations in Ib./ft.1 as determined in ac-
cordance with S 466.65(d)(l), corrected
to standard conditions, dry basis.
APPENDIXTEST METHODS
METHOD ISAMPLE AND VELOCITY TRAVERSES
FOX STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. A sampling site and the
number of traverse points are selected to
aid In the extraction of a representative
sample.
1.2 Applicability. ThU method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
FEDERAL IEGISTEK, VOL. 36, NO. 15?TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-l
-------
I
r>o
New Source Performance Standards. This
method Is not Intended to apply to gas
streams other than those emitted directly to
the atmosphere without further processing.
3. Procedure.
2.1 Selection of a sampling site and mini-
mum number of traverse points.
2.1.1 Select a sampling site that Is at
least eight stack or duct diameters down-
stream and two diameters upstream from
any now disturbance such as a bend, expan-
sion, contraction, or visible flame. For a
rectangular cross section, determine an
equivalent diameter from the following
equation:
equivalent diameter=2|
[length) (width) "I
length+width J
equation 1-1
2.1.2 When the above sampling site cri-
teria can be met, the minimum number of
traverse points Is twelve (12).
3.1.3 Some sampling situations render the
above sampling site criteria Impractical.
When this Is the case, choose a convenient
sampling location and use Figure 1-1 to
determine the minimum number of traverse
points.
2.1.4 To use Figure 1-1 first measure the
distance from the chosen sampling location
to the nearest upstream and downstream
disturbances. Determine the corresponding
number of traverse points for each distance
from Figure 1-1. Select the higher of the two
numbers of traverse points, or a greater value,
such that for circular stacks the number Is
a multiple of four, and for rectangular stacks
the number follows the criteria of section
3.2.2.
3.2 Cross sectional layout and location of
traverse points.
2.2.1 For circular stacks locate the traverse
potato on two perpendicular diameters ac-
cording to Figure 1-2 and Table 1-1.
NUMBER Of DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM*
(DISTANCE A)
FROM POINT OF ANY TYPE OF
DISTURBANCE (BEND. EXPANSION. CONTRACTION. ETC.)
Figure 1-2. Cross section of circular stack showing location of
traverse points on perpendicular diameters.
O
---- "
o
-____
e
'
i
0 ! °
-}--
O 1 O
1
1
r r -i
1
01 0
1
!
o
o
6
Figure 1-3. Cross section of rectangular stack divided Into 12 equal
areas, with traverse points at centroid of each area.
NUMBER OF DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM*
(DISTANCE B)
Figure 1-1. Minimum number o! traverM i*lnt*.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 13»TUESDAY, AUGUST U, 1971
1
-------
Table 1-1. Location of traverse points in circular stacks
(Percent of stack diameter from inside wall to traverse point)
i
CO
Traversa
point
number
ana
diameter
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
' 21
22
23
24
Number of traverse
6 8 10
4.4 3.3 2.5
14.7 10.5 8.2
29.5 19.4 14.6
70.5 32.3 22.6
85.3 67.7 34.2
95.6 80.6 65.8
89.5 77.4
96.7 85.4
91.8
97.5
.
f
12
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.5
64.5
75.0
82.3
88.2
93.3
97.9
14
1.8
5.7
9.9
14.6
20.1
26.9
36.6
63.4
73.1
79.9
85.4
90.1
94.3
98.2
points
16
1.6
4.9
8.5
12.5
16.9
22.0
28.3
37.5
62.5
71.7
78.0
83.1
87.5
91.5
95.1
98.4
on a diameter
18
1.4
4.4
7.5
10.9
14.6
18.8
23.6
29.6
38.2
61.8
70.4
76.4
81.2
85.4
89.1
92.5
95.6
98.6
20
1.3
3.9
6.7
9.7
12.9
16.5
20.4
25.0
30.6
38.8
61.2
69.4
75.0
79.6
83.5
87.1
90.3
93.3
96.1
98.7
22
1.1
3.5
6.0
8.7
11.6
14.6
18.0
21.8
26.1
31.5
39.3
60.7
68.5
73.9
78.2
82.0
85.4
88.4
91.3
94.0
96.5
98.9
24
1.1
3.2
5.5
7.9
10.5
13.2
16.1
19.4
23.0
27.2
32.3
39.8
60.2
67.7
72.8
-77.0
80.6
83.9
86.8
89.5
92.1
94.5
96.8
98.9
9.2.2. For rectangular stacks divide the
cross Motion Into as many equal rectangular
area* as traverse points, such that the ratio
of the length to the width of the elemental
area* Is between one and two. Locate the tra-
verse points at the centrold of each equal
area according to Figure 1-3.
8. References. Determining Dust Concen-
tration In a Oas Stream. ASME Performance
Test Code #27. New York. 1967.
Devoxkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity,
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Cases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy *tanu-
facturlng Co. Los Angeles. Bulletin \'P-50.
1908.
' Standard Method for Sampling Stacks for
Partlculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
Standards, Part 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
METHOD aDETERMINATION Or STACK OAS
VELOCITY (TYPE B PITOT TUB!)
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Stack, gas velocity Is de-
termined from the gas density and from
measurement of the velocity head using a/
Type S (Stauschelbe or reverse type) pitot
tube.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with
New Source Performance Standards. Being a
directional Instrument, a pltot tube should
not be used In the case of nondlrectlonal
flow.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Pltot tubeType S (Figure 3-1),.or
equivalent.
2.2 Differential pressure gaugeInclined
manometer, or equivalent, to measure ve-
locity head to within 10 percent of the mini-
mum valve.
2.3. Temperature gaugeThermocouples,
bimetallic thermometers, liquid filled sys-
tems, or equivalent, to measure stack tem-
perature to within 1.5 percent of the mini-
mum absolute stack temperature.
2.4 Pressure gaugeMercury-filled U-tube
manometer, or equivalent, to measure stack
pressure to within 0.1 in. Hg.
2.6 BarometerTo measure atmospheric
pressure to within 0.1 In. Bg.
2.8 Oas analyzerTo analyze gas compo-
sition for determining molecular weight.
2.7 Pltot tubeStandard type, to cali-
brate Type S pltot tube.
3.- Procedure.
3.1 Set up the apparatus as shown In Fig-
ure 2-1. Make sure all connections are tight
and leak free. Measure the velocity head at
the traverse points specified by Method 1.
' 3.2 Measure the temperature of the stack
/as. If the total temperature variation with
time Is less than 60* F., a point measurement
will suttee. -Otherwise, conduct a tempera-
ture traverse.
3.3 Measure the static pressure In the
stack.
3.4 Determine the stack gas molecular
weight by gas analysis and appropriate cal-
culation as Indicated In Method 3.
PIPE COUPLING
TUBING ADAPTER
O
o
1
I
Figure 2-1. Pitot tube - manometer assembly.
4. Calibration.'
4.1 To calibrate the pltot tube, measure
the velocity head at some point in a flowing
gas stream with both a Type S pltot tube and
a standard type pitot tube with known co-
efficient. The velocity of the flowing go*
stream should be within the normal working
range.
FEDERAL REGISTER,- VOL. 36, NO. 159TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, t971
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15711
4.2 Calculate the pilot tube coefficient
using Equation 3-1.
equation 2-1
where: -
C»....=Pltot tube coefficient of Type 8
pltot tube.
C».u=Pltot tube coefficient of standard
type pltot tube (If unknown, use
0.99).
/P.14=Veloclty head measured by stand-
ard type pitot tube.
AP,..,=Velocity head measured by Type S
pltot tube.
4.3 Compare the coefficients of the Type S
pitot tube determined first with one leg and
then the other pointed downstream. Use the
pltot tube only If the two coefficients differ
by no more than 0.01.
K Calculation*.
Use Equation 2-3 to calculate the stack gas
velocity.
V.-K.C.1
fT.Ap
F.M. equation 5-2
vhere:
V.=Stack gas velocity, feet per second (t.p.s.).
k"1 When these units
»» '« / >b. V
p=M'48 MO. Vlb.mote-'R )
C»=Pitot tube coefficient, dlmcnsionfess.
T, Absolute stack gas temperature, °R.
A,-= Velocity hoad of stack gas, lu HiO (see fig. 2-2).
P.» Absolute stack gas pressure, In lift.
Mi=Molecnlar weight of stack gas, Ib./lb.-mole.
PUNT__
DATE
RUN NO._
STACK DIAMETER. In._
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg._
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK (Pg), In. Hg._
OPERATORS
SCHEMATIC OF STACK
CROSS SECTION
Traverse point
number
Velocity head,
in. H20
AVERAGE:
Stack Temperature
Figure 2-2 shows a sample recording sheet
for velocity traverse data. Use the averages in
the last two columns of Figure 2-2 to deter-
mine the average stack gas velocity from
Equation 3-2.
6. Reference*.
Mark, L. 8. Mechanical Engineers' Hand-
book. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York,
1951.
Perry, J. H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook.
McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1960.
Sblgehara. R. T., W. P. Todd, and W. S.
Smith. Significance of Errors In Stack Sam-
pling Measurements. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association, St. Louis, Mo., June 14-19. 1970.
Standard Method-for Sampling Stacks for
Partlculate Matter. In: 1971 Book of ASTM
standards, Pan 23. Philadelphia, 1971. ASTM
Designation D-2928-71.
Vennard, 3. K. Elementary Fluid Mechanics.
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1947.
METHOD 3CAS AKALYSIS FOR CARBON DIOXIDE,
EXCESS ATB, AHD DRY MOLZCTTLAB WEIGHT
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. An Integrated or grab gas
sample is extracted from a sampling point
and analyzed for Its components using an
Great analyzer.
1.2 Applicability. This method should be
applied only when specified by the test pro-
cedures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards.
2. Apparatus. ~~
2.1 Grab sample (Figure 3-1).
2.1.1 ProbeStainless, steel or Pyrex1
glass, equipped with a filter to remove par-
ticulate matter.
2.1.2 PumpOne-way squeeze bulb, or
equivalent, to transport gas sample to ana-
lyzer..
2.2 Integrated sample (Figure 3-2).
2.2.1 ProbeStainless steel or Pyrex»
glass equipped with a filter to remove par-
tlculate matter.
2.2.2 Air-cooled condenserTo remove
any excess moisture.
2.2.3 Needle valveTo adjust flow rate.
2.2.4 PumpLeak-free, diaphragm type,
or equivalent, to pull gas.
2.2.5 Bate meterTo measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.035 c.f Jn.
22.6 Flexible bagTedlar,1 or equivalent,
with a capacity of 2 to 3 cu. ft. Leak test the
bag in the laboratory before using.
2.2.7 Pltot tubeType S, or equivalent,
attached to the probe so that the sampling
flow rate can be regulated proportional to the
stack gas velocity when velocity is varying
with time or a sample traverse Is conducted.
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 Orsat analyzer, or equivalent.
3. Procedure.
3.1 Grab sampling.
3.1.1 Set up the equipment as shown In
Figure 3-1. Place the probe In the stack at a
sampling point and purge the sampling line.
Figure 2-2. Velocity traverse data.
> Trade name.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOt. 36, NO. 159TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
So. 159Pt H-
E-4
-------
15712
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
»tOBE
FLEXIBLE TUBING
LTERIG
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
SQUEEZE BULB
Figure 3-1. Grab-sampling train.
RATE METER
VALVE
AIR-COOLED CONDENSER
PROBE
\
QUICK DISCONNECT
FILTER (GLASS WOOL)
RIGID CONTAINER^
Figure 3-2. Integrated gas - sampling train.
3.1.2 Draw sample Into the analyzer.
3.2 Integrated sampling.
3.2.1 Evacuate the flexible bag. Set up the
equipment as shown In Figure 3-2 with the
bag disconnected. Place the probe In the
stack and purge the sampling line. Connect
the bag, making sure that all connections
are tight and that there are no leaks.
3.2.2 Sample at a rate proportional to the
stack gas velocity.
3.3 Analysis.
3.3.1 Determine the CO2, 02, and CO con-
centrations as soon as possible. Make as many
passes as are necessary to give constant read-
Ings. If more than 10 passes are necessary,
replace the absorbing solution.
3.3.2 For Integrated sampling, repeat the
analysis until three consecutive runs vary
no more than 0.2 percent by volume for each
component being analyzed.
4. Calculations.
4.1 Carbon dioxide. Average the three
consecutive runs and report result to the
nearest 0.1 percent CO*.
4.2 Excess air. Use Equation 3-1 to cal-
culate excess air, and-average the runs. Re-
port the result to the nearest 0.1 ; rcent
excess air.
% RA =
(%Oi)-0.5(%CO) '
0.2G4(% N,)-<% 0,)+0.5(%
equation 3-1
where:
%EA=Percent excess air.
%O.=Percent oxygen by volume, dry
basis.
%N,=Percent nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
%CO=Percent carbon monoxide by vol-
ume, dry basis.
0.261=Ratio of oxygen to nitrogen In air
by volume.
4.3 Dry molecular weight. Use Equation
3-2 to calculate dry molecular weight and
average the runs. Report the result to the
nearest tenth.
Md=0.44(% CO,) +0.32(% O.)
+0.28(%N,+ %CO)
Equation 3-1
where:
Ma=Dry molecular weight, lb./lb.-
mole.
% CO,=Percent carbon dioxide by volume,
dry basis.
%O.=Percent oxygen by volume, dry
. basis.
%N_=Percent nitrogen by volume, dry
basis.
0.44=Molecular weight of carbon dioxide
divided by 100.
0.32=Molecular weight of oxygen
divided by 100.
0.28=Molecular weight of nitrogen
divided by 100.
8. References
TO ANALY7ER Altshuller, A. P., et al. Storage of Oases
and Vapors in Plastic Bags. Int. J. Air &
Water Pollution. 6.-75-81.1963.
Conner, William D., and J. S. Nader Air
Sampling with Plastic Bags. Journal of the
American Industrial Hygiene Association.
25:291-297. May-June 1964. ,
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Los Angeles. November 1963.
METHOD 4 DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE IN
STACK CASES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Moisture is removed from
the gas stream, condensed, and determined
gravimetrlcally.
1.2 Applicability. This method Is appli-
cable for the determination of moisture In
stack gas only when specified by test proce-
dures for determining compliance with New
Source Performance Standards. This method
does not apply when liquid droplets are pres-
ent In the gas stream.2
Other methods such as drying tubes, wet
bulb-dry bulb techniques, and volumetric
condensation techniques may be used sub-
ject to the approval of the Administrator.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 ProbeStainless steel or Pyrex' glass
sufficiently heated to prevent condensation
and equipped with a filter to remove par-
tlculate matter.
2.2 ImplngersTwo midget Implngers,
each with 30 ml. capacity, or equivalent.
2.3 Ice bath containerTo condense
moisture In Implngers.
2.4 Silica gel tubeTo protect pump and
dry gas meter.
2.5 Needle valveTo regulate gas flow
rate.
2.6 PumpLeak-free, dip**'""" type, or
equivalent, to pull gas through train.
2.7 Dry gas meterTo measure to within
. percent of the total sample volume.
2.8 RotameterTo measure a flow range
from 0 to 0.1 c.f.m.
2.9 BalanceCapable of measuring to the
nearest 0.1 g.
2.10 BarometerSufficient to read to
within 0.1 in. Hg.
2.11 PifcttubeType S, or equivalent, at-
tached to probe so that the sampling flow
rate can be regulated proportional to the
stack gas velocity when velocity Is varying
with time or a sample traverse is conducted.
3. Procedure.
3.1 Place about 5 ml. distilled water in
each Impinger and weigh the Impinger and
contents to the nearest 0.1 g. Assemble the
apparatus without the probe as shown in Fig-
ure 4-1. Leak check by plugging the inlet to
the first Impinger and drawing a vacuum. In-
sure that flow through the dry gas meter Is
Mess than 1 percent of the sampling rate.
3.2 Connect the probe, and sample at a
constant rate of 0.075 c.f.m. or at a rate pro-
portional to the stack gas velocity not to ex-
ceed 0.075 c_f.m. Continue sampling until the
dry gas meter registers 1 cu. ft. or until visible
liquid droplets are carried over from the first
Impinger to the second. Record temperature,
pressure, and dry gas meter reading as re-
quired by Figure 4-2.
3.3 After collecting the sample, weigh the
Implngers and their contents again to the
nearest 0.1 g.
i Trade name.
2 If liquid droplets are present In the gas
stream, assume the stream to be saturated,
determine the average stack gas temperature
(Method 1), and use a psy chrome trie chart
to obtain an approximation of the moisture
percentage.
FEDERAL HEGISTEK, VOL. 36, NO. J5»TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-5
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15713
4. Calculations.
4. 1 Volume ot water collected.
-(W|-Wt)RT.Mt.
--
eqaation 4-1
where:
V,,=Volume of water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
W(=Flnal weight ot implngers and
contents, g.
Wi=IniUal weight of Implngers and
contents, g.
R= Ideal gas constant, 21.83-ln. Hg
cu. ft./lb. mole-* B.
T,,4=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions. 630" R.
P.14rrPressure at standard conditions,
39.92 in. Hg.
Mw=Molecular weight of water, 18
Ib./lb. mole.
4J2 Gas volume.
SILICA GEL TUBE
HEATED
FILTER'(GLASS WOOL)
ROTAMETER
ICE BATH
LOCATION.
TEST
DATE
OPERATOR.
IIDGET IMPINGERS PUMP
Figure 4-1. Moisture-sampling train.
COMMENTS
DRY GAS METER
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE.
CLOCK TIME
GAS VOLUME THROUGH
HETER. (Vm).
ft3
ROTAMETER SETTING,
ft3/min
-
METER TEMPERATURE,
F
-
ra equation 4-2
where:
V.,=Dry gas volume through meter at
standard conditions, cu. ft.
V.=Dry gas volume measured by meter,
' cu. ft.
Pm=Barometric pressure at the dry gas
meter, In. Hg.
P,,, = Press xire at standard conditions,
29.92-ln. Hg.
T.l=Absolut« temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
T«=Absolute temperature at meter
(*P.+460),*H.
4.3 Moisture content.
~ Y..
Figure 4-Z. Field moisture determination.
equation 4-3
where:
Bw.=Proportion by volume of water
vapor In the gas stream, dlmen-
slonless.
V»t=Volume ot water vapor collected
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
V»<=Dry gas volume through meter
(standard conditions), cu. ft.
B»«=Approximate volumetric proportion
of water vapor in the gas stream
leaving the Impingers, 0.025.
5. Reference!.
Air Pollution Engineering Manual,
Danlelson, J. A. (ed.). U.S. DHEW, PHS.
National Center for Air Pollution Control.
Cincinnati, Ohio. PBS Publication No.
999-Ap-W. 1967.
Devorkln, Howard, et al. Air Pollution
Source Testing Manual. Air Pollution Con-
trol District. Lor Angeles, Calif. November
1963.
Methods for Determination of Velocity.
Volume, Dust and Mist Content of Gases.
Western Precipitation Division of Joy Manu-
facturing Co., Los Angeles, Calif. Bulletin
WP-SO. 1968.
METHOD S. DETERMINATION OF FARTICUUkTE
EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. Paniculate matter Is with-
drawn isottnetically from the source and its
weight Is determined gravimetrlcally after
removal of uncomblned water.
1.2 Applicability. This method is applica-
ble for the determination of particnlate
emissions from stationary sources only when
specified by the test procedures for deter-
mining compliance with New Source Per-
formance Standards.
2. Apparatus.
2.1 Sampling train. The design specifica-
tions of the paniculate sampling train used
by EPA (Figure 5-1) are described In APTD-
0581. Commercial models of this train are
available.
2.1.1 NozzleStainless steel (316) with
sharp, tapered leading edge.
2.1.2 ProbePyrex" glass with a heating
system capable of maintaining a gas tempera-
ture of 260* P. at 'the exit end during
sampling. When temperature or length
limitations are encountered, 316 stainless
steel, or equivalent, may be used, as approved
by the Administrator.
FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL 36. NO. 159TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-6
-------
15714
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
3.1.3 Pltot tubeType 8, or equivalent,
attached to probe to monitor stack gat
Telocity.
3.1.4 niter holderPyrex » glass with
heating system capable of maintaining any
temperature to a «Miimim of 226* F.
3.1.5 ImplngeraFour Implngers con-
nected In series with glass ball Joint fittings.
The first, third, and fourth Implngers are of
titie Greenburg-Smlth design, modified by re-
placing the tip with a %-lnch ID glass tube
extending to >/3-lnch from the bottom of the
flask. The second Implnger Is of the Qreen-
burg-Smlth design with the standard Up.
2.1.8 Metering systemVacuum -gauge,
leak-free pump, thermometers capable of
measuring temperature to within 5* F., dry
gas meter with 2 percent accuracy, and re-
lated equipment, or equivalent, as required
to maintain an isoklnetlc sampling rate and
to determine sample volume.
PROBE
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
HEATED AREA flLTER HOLDER THERMOMETER CHECK
,VALV£
VACUUM
LINE
IMPINGERS ICE BATH
BY-PASS.VALVE
VACUUM
GAUGE
'ALVE
DRY TEST METER
AIR-TIGHT
PUMP
Figure 5-1. Partlculate-sampling train.
S.l.T BarometerTo measure atmospheric
pressure to ± 0.1 in. Hg.
2.2 Sample recovery.
2.2.1 Probe brushAt least as long as
probe.
2.2.2 Qlsw '"ash bottlesTwo.
2.2.3 Glass sample storage containers.
2.2.4 uraduated cylinder260 ml.
2.3 Analysis.
2.3.1 ai
-------
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
15715
LOCATION.
OPERATOR.
DATE
HUN NO.
SAMPLE BOX N0._
METER BOX N0._
METER *Hffl
CFACTOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURED
ASSUMED MOISTURE, X_
HEATER BOX SETTING
PROBE LENGTH, in.
NOZZLE DIAMETER, in. _
PROBE HEATER SETTING.
SCHEMATIC OF STACK CROSS SECTION
TRAVERSE POINT
NUMBER
TOTAL
SAMPLING
TIME
W. min,
AVERAGE
STATIC ,
PRESSURE
(Ps). In. Hs.
STACK
TEMPERATURE
.*F
VELOCITY
HEAD
(A PS).
-
PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
ACROSS
ORIFICE
METER
(AH),
in. H20
GAS SAMPLE
VOLUME
IVm), ft3
GAS SAMPLE TEMPERATURE
AT DRY GAS METER
INLET
lTm,n.),«F
Avg.
OUTLET
""out'-*'
Avg.
Avg.
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE,
F
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
"F
4.2 Sample recovery. Exercise care In mov-
ing the collection train from the test site to
the sample recovery area to minimize the loss
ol collected sample or the gain of extraneous
partlculate matter. Set aside portions of the
water and acetone used in the sample recov-
ery as blanks for analysis. Place the samples
In containers as follows:
Container No. 1. Remove the filter from Its
holder, place In this container, and seal.
Container No. 2. Place loose participate
matter and acetc ;.« washings from all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces prior to the filter In this
container and seal. Use a razor blade, brush.
or rubber policeman to loosen adhering par-
ticles.
Container No. 3. Measure the-volume of
water from the first three Implngers and
place the water in this container. Place water
Figure 5-2. Particular field data.
rinsings of all sample-exposed surfaces be-
tween the filter and fourth Implnger In this
container prior, to sealing.
Container No. 4. Transfer the silica gel
from the fourth impinger to the original
container and seal. Use a rubber policeman
as an aid in removing silica gel from the
Implnger.
Container No. 5. Thoroughly rinse all sam-
ple-exposed surfaces between the filter and
fourth impinger with acetone, place the
washings in this container, and seal.
4.3 Analysis. Record the data required on
the example sheet shown In Figure 5-3.
Handle each sample container as follows:
Container No. 1. Transfer the later and any
loose partlculate ma' ter from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish, des-
sicatc. and dry to a constant weight. Report
results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 2. Transfer the acetone
washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pres-
sure. Desslcate and dry to a constant weight.
Report results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 3. Extract organic particulate
from the Implnger solution with three 25 ml.
portions of chloroform. Complete the ex-
traction with three 25 ml. pontons of ethyl
ether. Combine the ether and chloroform ex-
tracts, transfer to a tared beaker and evapo-
rate at 70° F. until no solvent remains. Des-
slcate, dry to a constant weight, and report
the results to the nearest 0.5 mg.
Container No. 4. Weigh the spent silica
gel and report to the nearest gram.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 159.TUESDAY, AUGUST 17. Wl
E-8
-------
15716
PROPOSED RULE MAKING
PLANT_
DATE
RUNNO._
CONTAINER
NUMBER
1
2
3a»
3b'»
6
TOTAL
WEIGHT OF PARTICIPATE COLLECTED.
ma
FINAL WEIGHT
"
:x^
TARE WEIGHT
;><;
WEIGHT GAIN
where:
V».M=Volume at gas (ample through the
dry gas meter (standard condi-
tions), cu. ft.
V» =Volume of gas sample through the
dry gas meter (meter conditions),
eu. It.
TIt<=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 630 'R.
T.=Aver age dry gas meter temperature,
R.
Pk,,=: Barometric pressure at the orifice
meter. In. Hg.
AH=Pressure drop across the orifice
meter, in HiO.
13.6=Specific gravity of mercury.
P.ld=:Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions, 29.92 In. Hg.
6.1.3 Volume of Water vapor.
(.
.,,,
*3a ORGANIC EXTRACT FRACTION.
"3b RESIDUAL WATER FRACTION.
FINAL
INITIAL
LIQUID COLLECTED
TOTAL VOLUME COLLECTED
VOLUME OF LIQUID
WATER COLLECTED
IMPINGER
VOLUME.
ml
-
SILICA GEL
WEIGHT.
8
,
9* ml
CONVERT WEIGHT OF WATER TO VOLUME BY DIVIDING TOTAL WEIGHT'
INCREASE BY DENSITY OF WATER. (1 g/ml):
B VOUJME *ATER-
equation 5-2
where:
Vw.,d=Volume of water vapor m the gas
sample (standard conditions), cu.
ft.
Vi0=Total volume of liquid collected in
Implngers and silica gel (see Fig-
ure 6-3), ml.
m^j:= Density of water, 1 g./ml.
MB,O=Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib./lb.
mole.
R=Ideal gas constant, 21.83 in Hg-cu.
ft./lb. mole-'R.
Tlld=: Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
pltd=Absolute pressure at standard con-
ditions, 29.92 in. Hg.
6.1.4 Total gas volume.
..
equation 5-3
where:
V,.,,,=Total volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions), cu. ft.
V».u=Volume of gas through dry gas
meter (standard conditions), cu.
ft.
Vw,,d=Volume of water vapor in the gas
sample (standard conditions), cu.
ft.
6.1.6 Total participate weight. Determine
the total partlculate catch from the sum of
the weights on the analysis data sheet (Fig-
ure 5-3).
6.1.6 Concentration.
Figure 5-3. Analytical data.
Container No. 6. Transfer the acetone
washings to a tared beaker and evaporate to
dryness at ambient temperature and pres-
sure. Desiccate, dry to a constant weight, and
report the results to the nearest 0.6 mg.
5. Calibration.
Use standard methods and equipment ap-
proved by the Administrator to calibrate
the orifice meter, pltot tube, dry gas meter,
and probe heater.
6. Calculations.
6.1 Sample concentration method.
6.1.1 Average dry gas meter temperature.
See data sheet (Figure 6-2).
6.1.2 Dry gas volume. Correct the sample
volume measured by the dry gas meter to
standard conditions (70* P., 29.92 In. Hg) by
using Equation 6-1.
AH\
equation 5-1
equation 5-4
where:
c'. = Concentration of particular matter
In stack gas (Sample Concentra-
tion Method), gr./s.c.f.
M.=Total amount of partlculate mat-
ter collected, mg.
Vlel.,=Total volume of gas sample (stand-
ard conditions), cu. f t.
6.2 Ratio of area method.
6.3.1 Stack gas velocity. Collect the neces-
sary data as detailed in Method 2. Correct the
HDIHAl lEeiSTEI. VOL Je, NO. 159TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
E-9
-------
tack gu velocity to standard conditions
(29.92 In. Hg, 530° R.) as follows:
I
in. HgA T. / equation 5-5
where:
V..td=Stack ga> velocity at standard con-
ditions, ft./sec.
M. A.
M. T A,
V.= Stack gas velocity calculated by
Method 2. Equation 2-2. ft./sec.
P.=Absolute stack gas pressure, In. Hg.
1?,,,,=Absolut* pressure at standard oon-
tlons, 29.92 In. Hg.
T,,d=Absolute temperature at standard
conditions, 530° R.
Ti=Absolute stack gas temperature
(average), 'R.
t
6.2.2 Concentration.
where:
Ci=Concentration of paniculate matter
in the stack gas (Ratio of Area
Method), gr./s.c.f.
Mi=Partlculate mass flow rate through
the stack (standard conditions),
mass/time.
Q.=Volumetric flow rate of gas stream
through the stack (standard con-
ditions) , volume/time.
m
i
Mn=Total amount of partlculate matter
collected by train, mg.
. >=Total sampling time, mln.
A.=Cross-sectional area of stack, sq. ft.
A.=Cross-sectional area of nozzle, sq. ft.
V.lta=stack gas velocity at standard con-
ditions, ft./sec.
6.3 Isoklnetlc variation.
X100 =
c'. = Concentration of partlculate matter
in the stack gas (Sample Concentra-
tion Method), gr./s.c.f.
7. References.
Addendum to Specifications for Incinerator
Testing at Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPC.
Dec. 6,1967.
Martin, Robert M. Construction Details of
Isoklnetlo Source Sampling Equipment. En-
vironmental Protection Agency, APTD-0581.
Rom, Jerome J. Maintenance, Calibration,
and Operation of Isoklnetlo Source Sampling
Equipment. Environmental Protection
Agency, APTD-0576.
Smith, W. 8.; R. T. Shigehara, and W. F.
Todd. A Method of Interpreting Stack Sam-
pling Data. Paper presented at the 63d
Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
Association, St. Louis. June 14-19, 1970.
Smith, W. S., et al. Stack Gas Sampling Im-
proved and Simplified with New Equipment.
APCA Paper No. 67-119.1967.
Specifications for Incinerator Testing at
Federal Facilities. PHS, NCAPC. 1967.
METHOD 6DCTTRMINATION Or SUtTUB DIOXIDr
EMISSIONS FBOM STATIONARY SOURCES
1. Principle and applicability.
1.1 Principle. A gas sample Is extracted
from the sampling point in the stack, and
the acid mist Including sulfur trloxlde la
separated from the sulfur dioxide. The sulfur
dioxide fraction is measured by the barium-
thorln tltratlon method.
1.2 Applicability. This method is appllca-
9V.P.A.
where: '
I=Percent of Isoklnetlc sampling.
C.=Concentration of partlculate matter
in the stack gas (Ratio of Area
Method), gr./a.c.f.
C J = Concentration of partlculate matter
in the stack gas (Sample Concen-
tration Method), gr./s.c.f.
Vi,=Total volume of liquid collected in
Impingers and silica gel (see Fig-
ure 5-3), ml.
/>K.,O=Density of water, 1 g./ml.
R=Ideal gas constant, 21.83 in. Hg-cu.
ft./lb. mole-°R.
MH,o=Molecular weight of water, 18 Ib./lb.
mole.
V«=Volume of gas sample through the
dry gas meter (meter conditions),
cu. ft.
T«=Absolute average dry gas meter tem-
perature (see Figure 5-2), *R.
Pbi,=Barometr!c pressure at sampling
site, in Hg.
AH=Average pressure drop across the ori-
fice (see Figure 5-2), In H9O.
Ti= Absolute average stack gas tempera-
ture (see Figure 6-2), 'R.
equation 5-7
I=Total sampling time, mln.
V.=Stack gas velocity calculated by
Method 2, Equation 2-2, ft/sec.
P.=Absolute stack gas pressure, In. Hg.
A.=Cross-sectional area of nozzle, sq. ft.
6.4 Acceptable results. The following
range sets the limit on acceptable Isoklnetlc
sampling results:
If 82 percent l. SOj sampling train.
O
O
50
2
O
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 139TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1971
-------
CARBON MONOXIDE SAMPLING
Stack gas is drawn from the stack through a filter, into an MSA Lira*
infrared analyzer. This instrument is mated to a Brush*Chart-strip recorder
which reads out directly. The unit is calibrated on-site with a zero
calibration gas (nitrogen) and a known span gas (238 ppm carbon monoxide).
SCRUBBER EFFLUENT WATER SAMPLING
Samples of scrubber water were composited in glass jars, as well as
inlet (blanks) water samples, then total solids were measured by standard
laboratory technique.
*Mention of a specific company or product does not constitute endorsement
by EPA.
E-11
-------
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY REPORT
-------
SAMPLES
/T^Sr^Jb^Ayty 6^7
'->)./
K / l-Y
U)T.
^&^>r
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date
F-l
0/7 '
^.0797
-------
SAMPLES
l/,
yy
ICR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
m i
ALIQ
T-i. 73V'/
> V - 6 7 0 V
Q
V?
a.ao 13
i.o<36
L
BT&-Z
i 2 '/ '/ 7
^". /i'Vo
0.
kog<38
33
fl. Si-no
8 >.
0. o 2. 7
0.02
0X^7
Bs
6s'
O. « G
o.oo 7 ^
.60 0 d
5k -3
7 6 . 7 i 7 «
7^.9237
0 d Ot 1
O.o o
0.661%
1_
t:
Project Ho.
/ 7
Collection Date.
Analysis Date __
F-2
-------
SAMPLES
C
V~i +
wf
HO.
LOCATION end
SAMPIZ HO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT
ALIQ
MC i
ALIQ
Li
SHE- 1
O.I 12.O;
LL
, 132'/
''-' '" -'2.
l°>.
0-6108
G
LI
f- - 2
X5" 8"
2.6. 90 f 3
, s'
334
-3
30.0'"
6 o\
/.^O/
LL
0. (ii"
£?£/7
-2
,2817
£., i? 2 /
OJ^'S
~> d~L
0.3S10
LL
O o o > o $~
0.133
Le.
000 7.TV
2.7. ?393
0^70?
1.1-7700
UL
- 3
. 27
17.37/3
4^i
Trl
.A) ^ f -. v
0 0 i
?
11:1103
2$
.1111
lll./^
006
.o-^-ff.
5.?.
0 .// 8 «
8.1«1
Project Ho.
Collection Date.
Analysis Date _
F-3
-------
SAMPLES
/V\
T '
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS id
ALIQ
fl-TE -7
& & c- '/. '"
21.
?. (
ft o«/ £
;.
ai^C
la
7.
0.1011
<5- /o^3
. 877
O.t
6,
0. Of, ^ -i.
2.?. 76 i
2 ?. 5" ?0.f
O '6">7J
02.17
0.03??
Ua
J £
r. 3/77
. 6762
6. ov*r
2s'.'"39
27.7632.
17
2 7.7076
27.370V
27.270V
0.
O.W3.
IN £ H - 7.
. i> o 0 ^ 3 <9
27.0^4
las
OJJ&I
O.I til
,M F 'V - 3
Dob 7.Z.7
2-7.
0. /!'?«/
o. i w - /
7- -i'j
11.
?//?
0.01 OS
H -
Project No.
Collection Date.
Analysis Date _
F-4
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
HEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
VC i
ALIQ
W
?. 270?
i «
18
I o .a 3 i "I
Us.
Be. 17 ^'V
111
12 T £ - :
". 70^3
o,
£ 7 /- -J
." '> 6 ?- i
1.11 7f
it '61
».«>.
A ' L
. 01 11
0.3:
Us
H. & 6 1 6
W7?
6. /i/f
P-/77^
O.olto
.011 i
0.011*
/Z
0.0-5 f}
12 i :-' - 3
2 s~. t>o8o
o.nrt
0.06 i3
a A"
2.5: 2 / 75~
U
Project No
Collection Date_
Analysis Date _
F-5
-------
SAMPISS
A
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPI2 NO.
SAUPI£
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS ir|
ALIQ
l_
/
O.OOI
o-oo'ii
7?. 3/5-0
0.6ns
O.on 8
to.: 6 hi 2
0.0/5"
l_
O.OI
(5,0/00
01
0,0101
.fal'i.
/' ^ r - 7.-
-)i-l\0\
72.S33V
.o no
0/70
U
7S.
T£-
:').. Oo ': 0
O.o 06 1
o.ootl
O.O Of 1
77.
7.??^
. OOf)
O'Ofli-^
AT f - }
O'.Q 05%
7^;
7 ?.
. 0 0
#00?}
oo
-------
SAMPLES
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TXT.
ALIQ.
MS it*
ALIQ
X
X
L_
X
/HE-
X
X
L
7? . tlVZi.
>».«;/ 3.4
Tt.'t'tlO
0,0 0 6 f
0.
110
0.00 1
5-L
O-OOS'S
l_
- 2,
72 .'=;'} 87
73.6000
Z.
O. t> £0
31 0.0i~.".
o.ofo
l_
5 u) H -
-) b . i 7 .W^
/I E. /y - ;
7V. 7/06
71.1013
0. oc>9$
0.001%
0.00??
_ /»«/ 2.
0.0016
77.?''?
. o ) » 3
t>
0,011 3
7$ >vxl .
o.oi i 2
O.OID~)
5 .1
i_
'. 133)
4". VI »O
o-o
O . o 1 V /
/ 5"
3 V
M l^J V - ./
O.oo 7-S"
o.eolf
0.00
^
u; -V - 1.
7 a'.
0.06 f 6
O.Oo'il,
<5 , o o f 6
68./7W
-------
<-«-
-4f,
SAMPLES
:r~
-------
SAMPLES
"3 / /1
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ,
MG i
ALIQ
l_
377'.?
L_
SA'J
/? .
n.i
903.2.
. 7
/?.?
l_
L
/
-------
SAMPLES
fT^
/.'.-..
NO.
L
L
L
L
L
L
l_
L
i_
1_
Project
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
A-E -2,
,4 : !: - IT
5 >.; '-' ' '
~
~~* ^ r~~
' ^ -f ' >
/'. ; // - /
K! -,! -A
N - /-' --
r) vo ')» - /
' *' ..0 i ~ f
\ \ '_. '-''
ft .?" /:- _ /
£ '' / -'j.
37?. r
37-l.e
7.5
-JO/* v
10.1.
^ £k ft M '
380-7
/ ? 6
313.0
377. ^
/^"' */
3^ 7. r
n ,s
31 1-. /
£ .7
38?- 7
/0 . /
"l.V-
?.^V
3^^. 8
II 'i
33 r. J
./3.1
OOii /,
J Q f , O , ,
/ V . "2-
3 71. 5V
313,6
32O.")
/i. ?
fU'o
/l.S
??L'o
/?',?
:No. 7^y // 7
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
-
^
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
MS ii
ALIQ
.,..
7.r
/^
n.<
/,,
n.s
^
/.,
?.r
».
-------
SAMPLES
|CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPIE NO.
SAMPIE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS in|
ALIQ
-
L_
Ss £ -
. 6
11.0
377.7
13-1
Project No.
? oX ^ 7
Collection Date.
Analysis Date __
F-n
-------
SAMPLES
Project No.
Collection Date
Analysis
F-12
-------
SAMPLES
o ? -' - \
U) r' .
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
US it*
ALIQ
5^5
AUv,.
0. 0g
'.0/87
Project No.
7 £/ 7
Collection Date.
Analysis Date _
F-13
-------
SAMPLES
HO.
LOCATION and
SAMPIE NO.
SAMPLE
HEIGHT
TIT,
ALIQ,
MS
AUQ
it
u
95"
87 O.Z3J
a .t
O.oo is
L_
0.011.3
.T/*"
o. o'.
0. 06 X«-|
?7
L
26.2001
«. n ^ 7
E./7AL.
.ae» y
v,0 2 V ?
L
0 .002.5"
A
fl.oo-/ I
aoooi
0. o<ȣ)c;
L.
79
J- 6313
l. «3 t J
a/.
//o
p. 00 2.6
0.001.6
O.Ot, 19
a.
O. oca P
L.
160
*/.*
1I.7/V6
31.11 *
0 01*°
0,01 S$
0. o us
o. o.o io
a.o /2 8
lot
1 "5 . / a. ; /
f s.y/?x
33.1
5 00
0.00*12
?V. X7/1/
O
1.0QII
O Oo 19
3
g2. os
93.
,7.7*7?
0.7**?
6, « * / /
n . o o 11
Its-
85-
0 -00
r.f/2"
0.00 /b
O
tf.it 'I b
o .
a. Qi
101
?1. S? 2.3
00
I/O
. J1 ?*.
0.0011
oo /?
O
toy
6.0016
o.ootf,
o.oooo
7*.
/oo
0^07
o.oon
a. ao I")
a OB It
o.een
. coo]
o.
Project No. i>
Collection Date,
Analysis Date _
F-14
-------
,\ t
'. U n
SAMPLES
NO.
*?
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MG id
ALIQ
1_
f -S.-Y t /
?.7/07
0-o6H>
/"
6. 00 Id
0.06 1 A
0.00)4-.'
s/
VI. 7VV6
O .00 $6
0.0032
SI-is 60.
O.do 9
o.<
0.6C10
3. OOJ 0
L
i i r
'-' '
S"v. 27 V»
?v. 2^/ro
/3*
H.IISO
(9. 0 -X10
O.QOJ. I
0,02.6°!
>. 0*61
i_
?(. 01 7 /
g/. oi-XY
91. "i ' »
ll.ol 7J
0-OOtj )
« . O O / '/
^1^-
ft tfo»«
l_
3T. A 71 ?
0 . L
/9 O
gsT.fTtl
?i'
tfO 5-3
O. OQ l.f
O. c>ofl 7
0.0001
U
31 .00 /(,
0 .00? i
(5,0082
1_
U
?r
9.3111
0. 001.0
/ r
i r
$).-> hll
31 . 7 6 i?
0 00 11
0,0 0 2.7
6062, T
o.
U
73.9021
11.71 1b
too
0
0. oo 38
0. OO / 6
SO. 6111
/d,
30.6116
0.00?.?
0,0615
£3, o
> O
O .OOO'j
5(309
$1. 34
O .00
aoo 2 3
o. 6O9. 3
6
a.
o. coo?
gS.
JS. If ft
fejr??
flo<35
SS
/ 7
vo.ns*
o.oo 17
0.00 1 (,
coo i
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date _
F-15
-------
SAMPLES
/ C
|CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPI£ HO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS itj
ALIQ
no
l/t>
0.00x3
<5 00 *
o.oo
0.0005
III
20. ) 7
£.00/3
0.00 13
o. oo i (,
O
)?.*? 67
t, iO /O
o.ooia
O
81.
0.00 11
I IS
91.
O .
0,
10
». 8120
78. 9lio
0,6010
o .00 ov
o. oo n
O.OOOZ
O
16
ff.
Project No.
Collection Date,
Analysis Date __
F-16
-------
SAMPLES ' ' '.
CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MG in
ALIQ
l_
. >i-o
33. S-S3T
L/o
I'.O.
r.
6.03^6
0 . 0"i-
6 , 00
O .0231
3311
n
i? .079*
t>.Q Oil
0 .0*1?
3
3.85-??
; -7
>^
3- 9 ft?
0.
i .00
.'13
a 0275-
0,0301
u
!\\ H L~ -
22J27V2.
3?.
d.Oti*
d.
»
- 3
7T-3V37
11. '109
JrWM
a.. 6o1%
/N
-
^(>
6 -
/f r /r -
0.00 3 7
.eotl
0 ,
0.00^
063 7
O
A- r E -
m
o .00
o.loll
1,002.7
*o.
O.ae
.fe
.Col')
o
A r r~ -
^
?/ . */ 2 V la
Si. *)*(> -^
C.O01I
/V303
^gg7?
o
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date _
F-17
-------
SAMPLES
o
(
JCR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE HO.
SAIiPLE
WEIGHT
TIT
ALIQ
KG icj
ALIQ
?.
in
"JS. 13 T 3
y
ff.
0 00 fO
OO/g
- 1
32. ;. ;/A
f J . T5-35'
0,0 m
o. oo fa
001
O.OIZ1
C
'T- I
n
f? ^z °/
'
-^
S-7.33/7
£ - /
"2L
.076,1
71333?
o.lf'7
?/
0.11 &
22.1.323
S. 23 3*
.? J .^
0,077*
8S.3o3ztH
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analyeis Date _
F-18
-------
SAMPLES
A_
c&
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAlfPLE
HEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MB it*
ALIQ
L_
L
n
-
0.00^8
111
7? 33*
(3 .
.1
0 .
ti
9.
0-0771
0.00 '/
Q0132
Project No.
Collection Date_
Analysis Date _,
F-19
-------
SAMPLES
CR
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAHPLB
WEIGHT
TIT,
ALIQ.
MS iz*
ALIQ
L
? 30 3 ?
I2o
(, 7
O
/3J
71 .
7^7-3
77??
71.
717787
ft
fl.66/
O.OOIJ
£ -3
»1
O.OCKS
o.ooll
y.o<>*l
U
153
H- /
0-00
S/.J7S4/
»I.«JX5
et.oeslK
O
L
ft- -
6,00^
'-i 8?
O.O06O
0
L
7 9- 70
0.0 6^1
6.0 b
o.o6ft
5 £T *' -
gf. I1SJ
. n } e
0-0061
0.061V
0.00 I 1
O.0611
U
137
5 £
79. 7i ay:
». 7*77
.
71.71**
L
;N £ ;-; - ;
go.otii
>. 0/36
. 67.01 (
..
,01 3*
0.06(1
0.001%
o,
/3.1
»S~ 7 f 3 ?
ar.-??o7
-
.
y. 7 7 » i
Qdlil
o. toll
0.0011
ri t
3
IS
O-OOfl
0,oo°ll
0-0 of /
o A a*y t
L../N
.,' K -
111.
0 .00^2.
.6011
o
L
N
V
«/. 76 8V
li
0.00
8/.7S76
0.0036
0- 0 » 3 ^
0.6011
?. ^33?
.00^7
.00$?
, 60 eg
o. ecog
Project No. 't> ^ 7 -: /.7
Collection Date.
Analysis Date __
F-20
-------
0
SAMPLES
A^ IJL irf
/K
NO.
LOCATION and
SAMPLE NO.
SAMPLE
WEIGHT
TIT.
ALIQ.
MS id
AUQ
- b K- »<
1_
77.662*
\. 61
7V
QtOO^S
Lrz-3
W '
85 3629
S.it if
0.0*2.*
i>«
0.cd~r
O
L_
o.ootl
O.oo 2.1
1002>1~
ODCZl
o
E -
jl.ll If
?y..l
3^
. 21 /I
6001
.ii eo
0,6016
6.0611
o
£- -3
37.0S&1
97.0.1f1
o.ocio
It
Co^^
if.
L_
1_
U
l_
Project No.
Collection Date,
Analysis Date _
F-21
-------
APPENDIX G
TEST LOG
-------
TEST LOGS
Date
2/14/72
2/15/72
2/16/72
2/17/72
2/18/72
Time
1340-1700
1100-1240
1130-1500
1335-1450
1650-1800
1348-1405
1406-1410
1639-1655
1543-1606
1637-1707
1014-1026
No. 20 Furnace
Activity
A.M. Travel
P.M. Arrived, Safety Briefing, Unpack and
prepare equipment, Furnace No. 20.
A.M. Placed Equipment
P.M. First Sample - Hood Ducts
A.M. Furnace Down
Second Sample - Hood Ducts
Carbon Monoxide Sampling - Hood Duct
P.M. Third and Fourth Sample - Hood Duct
A.M. Furnace Down
P.M."First Sample - Tapping Exhaust
First Sample - Scrubber Exhaust
and Water Sample
Second Sample - Tapping Exhaust
Second and Third Sample - Scrubber
Exhaust and Water Sample
A.M. Safety Briefing for No. 13 Furnace
Orsat Analysis - Hood and Tapping Exhausts
Third Sample - Tapping Exhaust
Moved equipment to No. 13 Furnace
P.M. Travel
Date
2/21/72
2/22/72
2/23/72
Time
1415-1535
0900-1020
1220-1340
No. 13 Furnace
Activity
P.M. Travel
A.M. Furnace Down
P.M. First Sample - Hood Exhausts
A.M. Second Sample - Hood Exhausts
Third Sample - Hood Exhausts
6-1
-------
2/24/72
1530-1630
1520-1620
1230-1600
0855-0955
1010-1110
0903-1003
1034-1134
2/25/72
No. 13 Furnace (con't)
P.M. First Sample - Tapping Exhaust
First Sample - Scrubber Exhaust and
Water
Carbon Monoxide Sampling - Hood and
Tapping Exhausts
A.M. Second and Third Samples - Scrubber Exhaust
and Water
Second and Third Samples - Tapping Exhaust
P.M. Orsat Analysis - Hood, Tapping and Scrubber
Exhausts
Pack equipment
A.M. Travel
6-2
-------
APPENDIX H
RELATED REPORTS
-------
Related reports covering emissions from reactive metals furnaces,
under this same contract for the Environmental Protection Agency, are
as follows:
Test Number Survey Location
Emission
Control Device Status
FA-1
FA-2
FA-3
FA-4
FA-5
FA-6
FA-7
Foote Mineral Co.,
Steubenville, Ohio
Union Carbide Corp.,
Marietta, Ohio
AIRCO, Alloys and
Carbide, Niagara Falls,
New York
AIRCO, Alloys and
Carbide, Charleston,
South Carolina
Union Carbide Corp.,
Alloy, W. Va.
Chromasco Corp.,
Woodstock, Tennessee
Union Carbide Corp.,
Ashtabula, Ohio
None
Venturi
Scrubber
Baghouse
Issued August 1971
Issued October 1971
Revised December 1971
Electrostatic Issued November 1971
Precipitator
Baghouse
Scrubber
Scrubber
Issued June 1972
Issued June 1972
This Report
H-l
-------
APPENDIX I
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND TITLES
-------
R. N. Allen, P. E., Project Manager
T. E. Eggleston, Industrial Hygiem'st, Crew Leader
C. C. Gonzalez, Chemist
G. A. Cangiano, Engineer
G. B. Patchell, Senior Technician
J. R. Avery, Technician
L. W. Baxley, Technician
B. M. Brown, Technician
J. R. McReynolds, Technician
1-1
------- |