U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE ALLEGAN
ALLEGAN COUNTY
MICHIGAN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No,
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
tTGPO 697-O32
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKEALLEGAN
ALLEGAN COUNTY
MICHIGAN
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 182
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
MICHIGAN NATIONAL GUARD
FEBRUARY., 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Michigan Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 14
VI. Appendices 15
-------
11
F_ 0. R. £ W 0. R. D.
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
*>
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)j,
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
m
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the
Michigan National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
A. Gene Gazlay, former Director, and David H. Jenkins, Acting
Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources; and Carlos
Fetterolf, Chief Environmental Scientist, and Dennis Tierney,
Aquatic Biologist, Bureau of Water Management, Department of Natural
Resources, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during
the course of the Survey. John Vogt, Chief of the Bureau of Environ-
mental Health, Michigan Department cf Public Health, and his staff
were most helpful in identfying point sources and soliciting municipal
participation in the Survey.
Major General Clarence A. Schnipke (Retired), ther: the Adjutant
General of Michigan, and Project Officer Colonel Albert W. Lesky,
who directed the volunteer efforts cf the Michigan National Guardsmen,
are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.-
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF MICHIGAN
LAKE NAME
Allegan Res.
Barton
Belleville
Betsie
Brighton
Caro Res.
Charlevoix
Chemung
Constant!ne Res,
Crystal
Deer
Ford
Fremont
Higgins
Holloway Res.
Houghton
Jordon
Kent
Long
Macatawa
Manistee
Mona
Muskegon
Pentwater
Pere Marquette
Portage
Randall
Rogers Pond
Ross
St. Louis Res.
Sanford
Strawberry
Thompson
Thornapple
Union
White
COUNTY
Allegan
Kalamazoo
Wayne
Benzie
Livingston
Tuscola
Charlevoix
Livingston
St. Joseph
Montcalm
Marquette
Washtenaw
Newago
Roscommon
Genesee, Lapeer
Roscommon
Ionia, Barry
Oakland
St. Joseph
Ottawa
Manistee
Muskegon
Muskegon
Oceana
Mason
Houghton
Branch
Mecosta
Gladwin
Gratiot
Midland
Livingston
Livingston
Barry
Branch
Muskegon
-------
LAKE ALLEGAN
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Direct Drainage Area Lim'ts
O I 2 M11ES
i L
Scale
Distance in Miles to STP's:
Otsego STP - 4'j }
Plainwell STP - 8
Parchment STP - 16
Kalama zoo STP - 18-
-------
LAKE ALLEGAN
STORE! NO. 2603
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and the records of others (Anonymous, 1972a)
show that Lake Allegan is eutrophic. Of the 35 Michigan lakes
sampled in November when essentially all were well-mixed, 27
had less mean total phosphorus, 24 had less mean dissolved
phosphorus, and 23 had less mean inorganic nitrogen; of all
41 Michigan lakes sampled, 32 had greater Secchi disc transpar-
ency, and 24 had less mean chlorophyll a*.
Survey limnologists observed that Lake Allegan was very turbid
and had a high concentration of suspended particulate matter. They
noted the presence of rooted aquatic vegetation in the shallows
and reported a rather heavy blue-green algal bloom in September,
1972.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
There was a significant loss of phosphorus in the algal assay
sample, and the results are not representative of conditions in
the lake at the time the sample was collected.
The lake data indicate nitrogen limitation in June but phos-
phorus limitation in September and November.
* See Appendix A.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, Lake Allegan
received a total phosphorus load at a rate over 12 times
that proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as "dangerous"; i.e.,
12 times the eutrophic rate (see page 13). While it is likely
that Vollenweider's model is not applicable to water bodies
with such a short hydraulic retention time, the existing tro-
phic condition of Lake Allegan is evidence of excessive nu-
trient loads.
It is calculated that the municipal point sources included
in this study contributed about 23% of the total phosphorus
load. While even complete removal of phosphorus at these
sources would still leave a loading rate of about 215 Ibs/acre/
2
yr or 24 g/m /yr (i.e., about nine times the eutrophic rate),
in view of the very short hydraulic retention time, and the
questionable applicability of Vollenweider's model, it is
likely that a high degree of phosphorus removal at the munici-
pal sources would at least reduce the incidence and intensity
of nuisance algal blooms in Lake Allegan.
Now, it is known that there were unsampled point sources of
nutrients in the Lake Allegan drainage (Knight and Lauff, 1969)
beyond the 25-mile Timit of the Survey*; and assuming the mean
* See Working Paper No. 1, "Survey Methods, 1972".
-------
annual nutrient exports of Dumont Creek (page 12) are typical
of non-point contributions in the drainage, it is calculated
that the unsampled point sources contributed about 253,000
pounds of phosphorus and 729,000 pounds of nitrogen to the
Kalamazoo River drainage (at station A-2 and thence to Lake
Allegan) during the sampling year.
To effect a marked improvement in the trophic condition of
Lake Allegan, it appears that control of phosphorus at all of
the sampled and unsampled point sources will be necessary, and
it is calculated that an overall 80% reduction of the point
source load would reduce the loading rate to just over 11 g/
2
m /yr, or less than five times Vollenweider's eutrophic rate.
2. Non-point sources (page 12)--During the sampling year,
the phosphorus export of the Kalamazoo River was nearly four
times that of Dumont Creek and is evidence of the significance
of the unsampled point sources noted above.
In all, it is calculated that "non-point" sources con-r
tributed nearly 77% of the total phosphorus load to Lake
Allegan during the sampling year.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphemetry:
1. Surface area: 1,586 acres.
<>2. Mean depth: 11 feet.
3. Maximum depth: >20 feet.
4. Volume: 17,200 acre-feet .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 7 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name Drainage area* Mean flow*
Kalamazoo River 1,513.0 mi- 1,238.9 cfs
Dumont Creek 14.4 mi 11.7 cfs
Minor tributaries & 2
immediate drainage - 11.1 mi 11.2 cfs
Totals 1,538.5 mi2 1,261.8 cfs
2. Outlet -
Kalamazoo River 1,541.0 mi2** 1,261.8 cfs
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 42.7 inches.
2. Mean annual: 34.2 inches.
t Martin and Hanson, 1966; mean depth and retention time calculated on
basis of this volume.
* Drainage areas are accurate within ±5%; mean daily flows for 74% of the
sampling sites are accurate within ±25% and the remaining sites up to
±40%; and mean monthly flows, normalized mean monthly flows, and mean
annual flows are slightly more accurate than mean daily flows.
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake Allegan was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
three stations on the lake and usually from two or more depths at each
station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the second
visit, a single five-gallon depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, depth-integrated samples were collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 8 feet at station 1, 6 feet at station 2, and 20
feet at station 3.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C, and the
data for the fall sampling period, when the lake essentially was well-
mixed, are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary
is based on all values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling
times, refer to Appendix C.
-------
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
FALL VALUES
Parameter Minimum
Temperature (Cent.) 4.2
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1) 9.9
Conductivity (ymhos) 600
pH (units) 7.8
Alkalinity (mg/1) 218
Total P (mg/1) 0.092
Dissolved P (mg/1) 0.055
N0? + NO, (mg/1) 0.780
Ammonia fmg/1) 0.280
(11/14/72)
Mean Median
Maximum
5.5
10.6
600
7.8
227
0.123
0.057
0.825
0.343
6.3
10.4
600
7.8
227
0.111
0.057
0.830
0.355
6.3
11.9
600
7.9
236
0.180
0.060
0.870
0.400
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches)
16
29
32
36
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
06/14/72
09/18/72
11/14/72
Dominant
Genera
1. Cyclotella
2. Melosira
3. Synedra
4. Gloeocapsa
5. Nitzchia
Other genera
Total
1. Cyclotella
2. Melosira
3. Scenedesmus
4. Achnanthes
5. Synedra
Other genera
Total
1. Lyngbya
2. Cyclotella
3. Synedra
4. Melosira
5. Achnanthes
Other genera
Number
per ml
14,891
1,594
1,232
326
290
1,413
19,746
2,590
1,386
813
241
241
1,115
6,386
2,857
1,230
597
488
362
741
Total
6,275
-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
(Because of Instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent.)
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a_
Date Number (yg/1)
06/14/72 01 66.6
02 17.7
03 5.5
09/18/72 01 28.5
02 35.6
03 24.8
11/14/72 01 1.6
02 0.8
03 1.7
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
There was a loss of about 64% of the dissolved phosphorus
in the algal assay sample from the time of collection to the
beginning of the assay, and the results are not representative
of conditions in the lake at the time the sample was taken.
The lake data indicate nitrogen limitation in June (N/P
ratio-= 10/1) but phosphorus limitation in September (N/P =
15/1) and November (N/P = 20/1).
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Michigan National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of April and May, when two samples were collected, and
in January when ice cover prevented sampling at most sites. Sampling
was begun in October, 1972, and was completed in September, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Michigan District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loadings for
"minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were
2
estimated by using the nutrient loads, in Ibs/mi /year, in Dumont Creek
2
at station B-l and multiplying by the II area in mi .
The operators of the Allegan, Kalamazoo, Otsego, Parchment, and Plain-
well wastewater treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and
corresponding flow data. In this report, all of the nutrients from the
Allegan STP were assumed to have reached Allegan Lake during the sampling
* See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
10
year. However, because of two intervening impoundments in which
sedimentation and/or biological assimilation could have occurred,
only 50% of the phosphorus loads and 80% of the nitrogen loads from
Kalamazoo, Otsego, Parchment, and Plainwell were assumed to have
reached the lake.
In the following loading tables, the loads attributed to the Kalamazoo
River are those measured at station A-2 minus the STP loads.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Name
Allegan
Kalamazoo
Otsego
Parchment
Plainwell
Pop.
Served
4,000
83,800
3,915
2,000
3,020
Treatment
primary
act. sludge
trickling
filter
trickling
f i 1 ter
trickling
filter
Mean
Flow (mgd)
0.550
31.775
0.740
0.346
0.504
Receiving
Water
Kalamazoo River
Kalamazoo River
Kalamazoo River
Kalamazoo River
Kalamazoo River
2. Industrial** -
^
Reportedly, pulp and paper mill wastes, pharmaceutical
wastes, and meat-packing wastes are discharged to the Kala-
mazoo River upstream of Lake Allegan. Whether these wastes
are untreated, treated separately, or treated jointly with
domestic wastes is not known, but it appears these wastes
have a considerable impact on the lake (pages 2 and 3).
* Anonymous, 1972b.
** Knight and Lauff, 1969.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs - «,
Ibs P/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Kalamazoo River 339,020 76.3
Dumont Creek 820 0.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 630 0.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Allegan 11,060 2.5
Kalamazoo 76,740 17.3
Ostego 9,670 2.2
Parchment 2,100 0.5
Plainwell 4,040 0.9
d. Septic tanks - insignificant
e. Industrial (not known but
probably significant) - ?
f. Direct precipitation* - 250 <0.1
Total 444,330 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Kalamazoo River 339,960
3. Net annual P accumulation - 104,370 pounds
* See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Ibs N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Kalamazoo River 3,969,620 69.5
Dumont Creek 30,850 0.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 23,780 0.4
c. Municipal STP's -
Allegan 47,860 0.8
Kalamazoo 1,535,270 26.9
Ostego 41,860 0.7
Parchment 20,230 0.4
Plainwell 23,240 0.4
d. Septic tanks - insignificant
e. Industrial - (not known but
probably significant) - ?
f. Direct precipitation* - 15.280 0.3
Total 5,707,990 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Kalamazoo River 6,880,620
3. Net annual N loss - 1,172,630 pounds
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary Ibs P/mi2/yr Ibs N/mi2/yr N/P Ratio
Kalamazoo River 224 2,624 12/1
Dumont Creek 57 2,142 38/1
* See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
13
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his "dangerous" rate is the rate at which the
receiving water would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "permissible" rate is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with very short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
Ibs/acre/yr 280.2 65.8 3,599.0 loss*
grams/m2/yr 31.40 7.38 403.4
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m^/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Allegan:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 2.50
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 1.25
* The apparent loss of nitrogen may be due to nitrogen fixation in the lake,
solubilization of previously sedimented nitrogen, nitrogen-rich ground
water recharge, or possibly unsampled point sources between the inlet samp-
ling station (A-2) and the outlet (A-l). However, a similar nitrogen loss
has been observed at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota, which has been studied inten-
sively by EPA's National Eutrophication and Lake Restoration Branch.
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1972a. Biological survey of the Kalamazoo River, June-
August, 1971. MI Dept. of Nat. Resources, Lansing.
Anonymous, 1972b. Treatment plant questionnaires (Allegan, Kalamazoo,
Otsego, Parchment, and Plainwell STP's). MI Dept. Publ. Health,
Lansing.
Knight, Allen W., and George H. Lauff, 1969. Water quality studies
on the Kalamazoo River. Techn. Rept. #5, Inst. Water Res., Mich.
State U., East Lansing.
Martin, R. 0. R., and Ronald L. Hanson, 1966. Reservoirs in the
United States. Water Supply Paper #1838, U. S. Geol. Surv.,
Washington, D.C.
Vollenweider, Richard A. (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz.
Z. Hydro!.
-------
15
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
26AO HOLLOWAY RESERVOIR
26A1 CARD RESERVOIR
26A2 BOARDMAN HYDRO POND
2603 ALLEGAN LAKE
2606 BARTON LAKE
2609 BELLEVILLE LAKE
2610 BETSIE LAKE
2613 BHIGHTON LAKE
2617 LAKE CHARLEVOIX
2618 LAKE CHEMUNG
2621 CONSTANTINE RESERVOIR
2629 FORD LAKE
2631 FREMONT LAKE
26<>0 JORDAN LAKE
26<>3 KENT LAKE
26<>8 LAKE HACATAWA
26*9 MANISTEE LAKE
2659 MUSKEGON LAKE
2665 PENTKATER LAKE
2671 RANDALL LAKE
2672 ROGERS POND
2673 ROSS RESERVOIR
2674 SANFORD LAKE
26B3 THORNAPPLE LAKE
2685 UNION LAKE
2608 WHITE LAKE
2691 MONA LAKE
2692 LONG LAKE
MEAN
TOTAL P
0.062
0.117
0.006
0.123
0.121
0.118
0.025
0.109
0.007
0.04". '
0.027
0.105
0.372
0.180
0.040
0.197
0.018
0.087
0.027
0.246
0.026
0.034
0.016
0.042
0.083
0.027
0.307
0.163
-fALL VALUts-
MEAN
01SS P
0.043
0.022
0.005
0.057
0.086
0.048
0.008
0.073
0.006
0.014
0.008
0.058 .
0.342 '
0.144
0.015
0.120
0.010
0:0*3
11.017.
0.183
0.015
0.021
0.008
0.032
0.064
0.019
0.241
0.148
MEAN
INORG N
1.461
3.835
0.358
1.168
1.489
1.420
0.273
1.015
0.230
0.132
0.910
1.S36
1.406
1.998
0.417
2.358
0.304
0.469
0.496
0.818
0.183
0.460
0.307
1.737
1.252
0.367
0.963
0.749
500-
MEAN SEC
439.375
473.000
363.500
470.222
456.167
465.250
461.667
456.000
351. 2SO
404.333
456.167
456.167
441.667
427.667
455.000
477.600
4S1.333
436.444
430.667
457.333
435.500
465.333
458.750
442.833
455.500
417.778
451.667
41U.400
MEAN
CHLORA
10.678
11.967
1.267
20.311
27.600
28.262
4.567
44.233
3.008
13.483
39.317
14.733
28.SOO
20.517
33.944
25.600
6.317
9.511
16.083
27.217
8.133
10.383
13.791
14.650
IS. 667
9.211
27.783
10.067
15-
MIN UO
9.200
9.500
6.600
12.600
14.850
8.200
7.400
7.500
9.240
14.800
7.500
14.000
14.800
14.900
13.000
12.200
11.380
14.800
14.800
8.020
9.600
8.200
8.300
10.800
8.200
13.400
14.100
13.600
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
2693 ST LOUIS RESERVOIR
2694 CRYSTAL LAKE
2695 HIGGINS LAKE
2696 HOUGHTON LAKE
2697 THOMPSON LAKE
2698 PERE MAROUETTE LAKE
2699 STRAWBERRY LAKE
MEAN
TOTAL P
0.134
0.009
0.007
o.oia
0.043
0.032
0.069
TALL VALUta-
MEAN
DISS P
0.093
0.006
0.005
0.008
0.029
U.024
O.ObO
MEAN
INO&G N
1.227
0.164
O.U58
0.136
0.436
0.346
O.S67
500-
MEAN SEC
462.667
380.000
268.500
420.833
407.889
448.667
419.800
MEAN
CHLOHA
5.583
2.986
1.043
9.217
11.967
11.833
11.117
15-
MIN DO'
8.420
13.000
9.400
8.200
14.800
8.600
13.600
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES KITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
26AO HOLLOWAY RESERVOIR
26Ai CARO RESERVOIR
26A2 BOAHDMAN HYDRO PONO
2603 ALLEGAN LAKE
2606 BARTON LAKE
2609 BELLEVILLE LAKE
2610 BETSIE LAKE
2613 BRIGHTON LAKE
2617 LAKE CHARLEVOIX
2618 LAKE CHEMUNG
2621 CONSTANTINE RESERVOIR
2629 FORO LAKE
2631 FREMONT LAKE
2640 JORDAN LAKE
26*3 KENT LAKE
2648 LAKE MACATAWA
26*9 MANISTEE LAKE
26S9 MUSKEGON LAKE
2665 PENTWATER LAKE
2671 RANDALL LAKE
2672 ROGERS POND
2673 ROSS RESERVOIR
267* SANFORD LAKE
2683 THORNAPPLE LAKE
2685 UNION LAKE
26H8 WHITE LAKE
2691 MONA LAKE
2692 LONG LAKE
MEAN MEAN
TOTAL P UISS P
46
29
97
20
23
26
77
31
91
49
71
3*
0
11
57
9
80
37
69
6
74
60
86
5*
40
66
3
14
( 16)
( 10)
( 34)
( 7)
( 8)
( 9)
( 27)
( 11)
1 32)
( 17)
( 25)
( 12)
( 0)
< 4)
1 20)
( 3)
I 28)
( 13)
( 24)
( 2)
( 26)
( 21)
I 30)
( 19)
( 14)
( 23)
( 1)
( 5)
43
54
97
31
20
37
77
23
91
71
83
29
0
11
69
14
74
4-0
63
6
66
57
80
46
26
60
3
9
< 15)
( 19)
I 34)
< ID
( 7)
( 13)
( 27)
( 8)
( 32)
( 25)
( 29)
( 10)
( 0)
( 4)
1 24)
( 5)
( 26)
( 14)
( 22)
( 2)
( 23)
( 20)
I 28)
( 161
( 9)
( 21)
( 11
( 3)
MEAN
INORG N
17
0
69
31
14
20
80
34
83
94
40
11
23
6
63
3
77
54
51
43
86
57
74
9
26
66
37
46
( 6)
( 0)
( 24)
( 11)
( 5)
( 7)
( 28)
< 12) .
( 29)
( 33)
( 14)
< 4)
( 8)
( 2)
( 22)
( 1)
( 27)
( 19)
( 181
( 151
I 30)
( 20)
< 26)
( . 3)
( 9)
( 231
( 13)
< 16)
500-
HEAN SEC
57
3
91
6
29
11
17
34
94
86
29
29
54
69
40
0
46
60
66
23
63
9
20
51
37
80
43
77
( 201
( 1)
( 32)
I 2)
( 9)
( 4)
( 6)
< 12)
( 33)
( 30)
I 9)
( 9)
( 19)
I 24)
( 14)
( 0)
I 16)
( 21)
1 23)
( 8)
( 22)
( 3)
( 7)
( 18)
1 13)
( 28)
< 15)
( 27)
"ALL VALUCS--— -—
MEAN 15-
CHLORA MIN 00
60 (
49 (
94 I
29 (
14 (
11 (
86 <
0 (
69 (
46 (
3 (
37 (
9 (
26 (
6 (
23 (
80 1
69 (
31 (
20 (
77 (
63 (
43 (
40 <
34 1
74 (
17 (
66 (
21)
17)
33)
10)
5)
4)
30)
0)
31)
16)
1)
13)
3)
9)
2)
8)
28)
24)
11)
7)
27)
22)
15)
14)
12)
26)
6)
23)
63
54
97
40
3
79
94
90
60
11
90
23
11
0
36
43
46
11
11
86
51
79
71
49
79
31
20
27
( 22)
( 19)
< 34)
( 14)
( U
I "26 >
I 33)
( 31)
( 21)
( 2)
< 31)
1 8)
( 2)
( 0)
( 12)
( 15)
( 16)
( 2)
I 2)
( 30)
( 18)
I 26)
1 251
< 17)
1 26)
( 11)
( 7)
( 9)
INDEX
NO
286
189
545
157
103
184
431
212
508
357
316
163
97
123 •
271
92
403
271
291
184
417
325
374
249
242
377
123
239
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
2693 ST LOUIS RESERVOIR
2694 CRYSTAL LAKE
2695 HIGGINS LAKE
2696 HOUGHTON LAKE
2697 THOMPSON LAKE
2698 PERE MAROUETTE LAKE
2699 STRAWBERRY LAKE
MEAN MEAN
TOTAL H OISS P
17
89.
94
S3
51
63
43
( 6)
(. 31)
< 33)
< 29)
( IB)
( 22)
( 15)
17
89
94
86
49
51
34
( 6)
( 31)
( 33)
( 30)
( 17)
( 181
( 12)
MEAN
INORG N
29
89
97
91
60
71
49
( 10)
( 31)
( 34)
( 32)
< 21)
( 25)
( 17)
bOO-
MtAN SEC
14
89
97
71
83
49
74
( 5)
( 31)
( 34)
( 25)
( 29)
( 17)
( 26)
MEAN
CHLOHA
83
91
97
71
51
S4
57
( 29)
( 32)
( 34)
( 25)
( 18)
( 19)
( 20)
15-
M1N 00
69
36
57
79
11
66
27
( 24)
( 12)
( 20)
( 26)
( 2)
( 23)
( 9)
INDEX
NO
229
483
536
481
3U5
354
284
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR MICHIGAN
3/3/75
LAKE CODE 3603
ALLEGAN LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SQ MI) 1541.00
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAJSQ MI)
JAN
FE8
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CFS)
JUN JUL AUG
3603A1
2603A3
360381
2603ZZ
1541.00
1513.00
14.40
13.60
1346.00 1436.50 1958.10 1889.60 1583.50 1333.30 880.87 790.37
1314.00 1393.00 1909.00 1643.00 1543.00 1303.00 959.00 771.00
13.00 13.00 18.00 IB.00 15.00 11.00 0.00 7.00
13.00 13.00 17.00 17.00 14.00 11.00 8.00 7.00
SEP
813.41
793.00
8.00
7.00
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
1541.00
1541.00
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
939.19 1109.40 1196.00 1261.83
906.00 1082.00 1166.00 1330.94
9.00 10.00 11.00 11.74
8.00 10.00 10.00 11.15
15156.00
15158.02
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND JAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
3603A1
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3603A3
10
11
13
1
3
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
1350.00
1890.00
1940.00
3640.00
1640.00
2390.00
2490.00
2110.00
3060.00
1430.00
1330.00
1010.00
1330.00
1850.00
1900.00
3600.00
1610.00
3350.00
3490.00
2070.00
3020.00
1400.00
1310.00
993.00
38
30
33
5
5
13
16
39
34
33
38
38
30
23
b
5
12
16
14
2<*
23
28
1500.00
1760.00
2130.00
1760.00
2080.00
2210.00 23
1690.00 31
1470.00
1670.00
1760.00
1180.00
1480.00
1730.00
3090.00
1730.00
2040.00
2210.00 23
1660.00 31
1680.00 29
1640.00
1730.00
1160.00
2650.00
3160.00
2650.00
3100.00
1450.00
-------
IV I rf'J r AK Y KLUrt I-'JFiJrfMAr 1LM r-'UK MICHIGAN 2/3/7b
CUJE 2603 ^LLEo«N LAKF
MEAN MONTHLY FLOwS AND UAlLY FLOi«SJMY KLO* DAT rLO* iJAY FLU*'
10
11
12
1
'>>_
3
^
'3
H
7
H
9
10
11
12
1
;>
:i
<4
s
6
7
8
-}
72
72
72
73
7J
73
73
/3
73
73
7j
^3
72
72
/2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7J
73
12.bj 2^
17.^0 20
1^.1 j 22
2a. /a
1 5 . ~i u
22.30 b
23. 3o 12
19,/v 16
19.. 1C U
13.30 2n
I2.HJ 23
9.40 2-1
11.9J
I O . 7 (.
17. 10
23. 3u
1 4 . ^ 0
21.1..
2 2 . ;; u
1^.60
IB.?.)
12. -0
1 l.VO
jj, 9j
lH. JO
Ib. t>u
19.90
19.-H!
20.60 23 2^.bO
Ib.eO 31 29. bO
It. 00 29 13.BO
Ib.ou
Ib.bo
11.10
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/04
260301
42 32 00.0 085 52 00.0
ALLEGAN LAKE
26 MICHIGAN
GOOlu
DATE
FROM
TO
72/06/14
72/09/18
72/11/14
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 50 0000
13 50 OOOd
12 25 0000
12 25 0004
15 35 000.0
15 35 0004
wAlER
TEMP
CENT
24.1
23.9
2o.Si
4.2
t.3
00300 00077 00094
DO TKANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES M1CROMHO
6.8
11.9
16
24
32
67b
550
556
550
600
oOO
11EPALES
5
00400
PH
SU
7.90
7.90
8.06
8.08
7.90
7.60
00410
T ALK
CACOJ
MG/L
220
224
203
203
224
230
2111202
0008
00630
N02&NOJ
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.690
0.680
0.850
0.860
0.780
0.790
FtET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.240
0.230
0.180
0.150
0.280
0.280
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.133
0.147
0.206
0.224
0.146
0.180
00666
PMOS-OIS
MG/L P
0.094
0.085
0.076
0.067
0.056
0.055
DATE TIME [)E°TH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
72/06/14 13 50 0000
72/U9/13 12 ?5 0000
72/11/U 15 35 OOOJ
3^217
A
UG/L
66. bJ
26. oJ
l.oj
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE I,M
-------
STOKET REIKIEVAL DATE 75/02/o
-------
STOrtET RETKIEVAL DATE 7b/02/04
260303
42 34 00.0 085 57 00.0
ALLEGAN LAH.E
26 MICHIGAN
DATE
FROM
TO
72/06/14
72/09/18
72/11/14
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 15 OOOJ
14 15 0010
14 15 002o
11 45 0000
11 45 0004
11 45 uOll
15 15 0000
15 15 0004
15 15 0010
00010
wATtk
TtMP
ce.NT
24.1
23.7
21.3
20. H
20.2
6.3
6.3
00300
DO
MG/L
5.2
S.2
2.4
7.1
0.4
10. 0
9.9
uOu?7 OU094
fk^NbP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICrtOMHO
36
36
6bU
675
580
590
SttO
600
600
600
11EPALES
b
00400
PH
so
7.80
7.80
7.68
8.21
8.15
6.10
7.90
7.60
7.80
00<»10
T ALK
CAC03
Mii/L
226
232
226
203
203
203
232
236
222
2111202
0021
00630
N02tNU3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.520
0.510
0.500
0.700
0.700
0.680
0.640
0.650
0.670
FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.540
0.550
0.560
0.230
0.240
0.240
0.400
0.390
0.380
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.136
0.136
0.303
0.093
0.115
0.129
0.122
0.098
0.101
00666
PHOS-OIS
MG/L P
0.100
0.104
0.095
0.048
0.045
0.044
O.OS8
0.060
0.059
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH ChLrtPHYL
FHOM . OF A
TO DAY FEET O13/L
78/06/14 14 IS 0000 5.3J
72/09/lM 11 45 0000 ?4.3J
72/11/14 15 15 0000 l./J
J VALOE KNOWN TO BE I •>
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOHEI RETRIEVAL o«rt 75/02/04
2603A1 LS2603A1
42 34 00.0 085 5f 00.0
KALAMA/00 KlVEK
26055 15 ALLEGAN
O/LAIVE ALLEGAN
KU 4.5 MI WNW ALLEGAN
11EPALES 2111204
4 UOOO FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
72/10/2*
72/11/20
72/12/22
73/02/05
73/03/05
73/04/12
73/04/23
73/05/16
73/05/31
7j/06/29
73/07/24
73/03/23
73/u9/2*
00630 00
TIME DEPTH NO2&N03 TOT
OF n-TuTAL N
DAY FEET
10
19
10
20
13
2J
15
10
45
00
25
15
10
30
MG/L
0
fc
0
(j
o
0
j
'j
u
J
0
I?
u
.972
.920
.915
.t)30
.HOi.'
.670
.540
.450
.540
.440
.320
.3*9
.580
KJEL
MG/L
2
5
3
1
1
2
1
1
.550
.300
. £00
.590
.380
.050
.3 HO
.680
.200
. 7oo
.4JJ
. 7^0
.-UO
00610 00671 00665
NHJ-M PHOS-OIS phos-tor
TOTAL OHThO
Mb/L
J
1
0
0
•j
0
1.1
0
•J
0
•j
J
J
.250
.230
• 39o
.28o
.310
.150
.260
.052
.1 Ib
.294
.200
.21o
.231
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o .
0.
u.
0.
j.
u .
0.
P
041
050
036
031
040
035
040
019
042
065
054
066
040
MG/L P
0.130
0.110
0.096
0.100
0.125
0.090
0.135
•J. 145
0. 120
0.170
0.145
0.200
0.145
-------
SURET Kt.rKiF.VAL. UAH". 7
H^ 33 00.u Ohb 53 UO.O
KAl_Ai-iA/iUO KiVtK
c?b I'D ALLtGAiM
1/LAKt ALLtGAiV
bT HwYS HO >s 8S> tirtuG N* ALLEGAN dEL.0 STH
lit..-1 ALL 6 ^111204
4 0000 FhtT DEPTH
O.idlO
DUE TIME Dc^TH
F*UM 0"-"
fu DAY ff.£T
72/iO/2-» 10 '+5
72/11/20 20 10
72/12/2^ 10 30
73/u2/0L>
73/03/O.S 20 ub
73/V+/1? K 00
73/u4/23 2u 30
73/Jb/lb U 4b
7j/jb/3l
73/ub/ 14
7 j/.ib/2^
73/J7/2-+
73/OM/23
73/V-V/2H
i-40r.NN03 TOT
4-T'JfAL N
.^Jt.L Urt.^-N Hnuh-IJlS
Mt-,/1. MG/L
O.^UO 1
V.^?-) 1
I.IHU 3
O.H30 1
v.7-*j 0
C.&30 1
./.fcvl,' J
•,'.67o 1
i.'.S'ti' 1
i>.bs*j 1
• J . 4 o u 1
0 • ft 'J S.
l .b4.) 1
j.9rfj 1
.9
IOUL
-Ij/L
'it; o.?lu
.300 v.l be
. •-»
.4
. '•*
. J
. 4
. ?
• "t
.7
• *"*
.'-
. r.
.^
ou O.i?bo
70 .i.lcb
•no 0.154
-') 0 *j . U C- 1
0 ly J • 1 h J
00 0.3irlo
OJ 0.1 4S*
Ou •; . v Jc
nOb-TOI
Mo/L
0.
;j •
0.
U.
0 .
0 .
Vl .
0.
0.
u .
-------
STOrfET nETPIEVAL OAFE 75/02/o<+
2603A3 LS2603A3
<+2 31 00.0 085 51 OU.O
K4LAMA200 KIVEH
26 15 ALLEGAN
T/LAKE ALLEGAN
bT H*r 118 d«l)G ALLEGAN AdOVE STP
11EPALES 211120^
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FrfUM
ru
72/10/28
72/11/20
72/ 12/22
73/02/05
73/03/OD
73/04/12
73/04/23
73/05/lb
73/05/31
73/Ob/l*
73/Ob/2^
73/07/2*
73/08/23
73/09/28
OU630 0062^
TIME DEPTH .M02\N03 TO! KJEL
Of rJ-TUTAL N
DAY FEET Hb/L
10
20
11
20
21
15
20
l'»
55
30
00
35
00
00
*5
30
J
0
1
0
j
0
0
u
i;
u
0
0
0
0
.7*0
.v*o
. 140
.820
.780
.620
.610
.620
.530
.5*0
»*70
,73u
.550
.950
MG/L
1.
3.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
1.
*00
*00
920
260
180
050
*70
760
bOO
200
eOO
V*0
s*o
* 70
U0610 00671 Oo665
INH.J-N PrlOS-UIS PHOS-TJT
TOTAL URfrlO
MG/L
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0 .
0.
r-
w •
198
315
210
093
123
072
240
189
1*0
065
u<*2
357
1*0
100
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
LI.
p
U38
055
039
03«
C37
030
060
037
056
063
0*»h
071
070
069
MG/L P
0.180
0.135
0.120
0.125
0. 150
0. 120
0.200
0.220
0 .2*0
a. 3*0
0 .230
0.2bO
0.22U
0.22U
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL OAFt 7S/02/.J4
Li2603A<+
42 29 oO.O 065 47 00.0
KALAMA/COO KlVEK
26 Is GOriLtS
f/LAKL ALLEGAN
TrfOwbKOG UAM 3 Mi
11EPALES
bE OF ALLEGAN
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
OATE
FWUM
Tu
72/10/28
72/1 1/20
72/12/22
73/U2/05
73/03/05
73/04/12
73/04/23
73/C5/ lb
73/05/31
73/06/29
73/u7/24
73/08/23
7 j/09/26
TIME JEpTH N02&NU3 TOT KJt'L
OF -\- TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
20
11
21
14
21
14
00
BO
30
?0
30
00
15
MG/L
G
0
1
u
j
~*j
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
.730
.950
. 140
.670
«78(j
.640
.610
.610
.510
.540
.6aC
.43u
.980
MG/L
2.
2.
3.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
3.
1.
1.
100
100
440
150
050
100
3?0
235
400
300
300
700
3>0
00610 00671 00665
Nh3-N PnOS-Ulb PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OUTHU
MG/L
0 .
C.
0.
0.
v/ .
0.
a.
O •
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
210
348
305
064
095
108
169
176
llu
240
200
132
105
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.035
.060
.040
.044
.040
.036
.058
.046
.056
.058
.080
.072
.•J69
MG/L P
0.200
0.154
0.14J
O.lnu
O.l4u
0.120
0.1 75
0.2tO
0.210
0.280
0.280
0.2-^C
0.230
-------
STCWET KETRIF.VAL DATE 75/02/04
260J61 LS260381
42 33 30.0 065 54 00.0
DOMUNT CMEEK
26 lib ALLEGAN
T/LAKE ALLEGAN
ST HWY 40 «. 89 BrtDG 2 MI NwALLEGAN
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FhiOM
TO
72/10/28
72/11/20
72/12/22
73/01/12
73/03/05
73/04/12
73/04/23
73/05/16
73/05/31
73/06/14
73/06/29
73/07/24
73/08/23
73/09/28
00630 00625
TIME DEPTd N02&N03 TUT KJEL
OF N-TUTAL N
DAY FEET
10
20
10
20
13
20
14
<+0
00
15
45
30
20
00
HG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.234
.330
.490
.315
.420
.200
.138
.138
.074
.100
.210
.176
.095
.115
MG/L
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
2.
0.
0.
050
600
440
500
480
660
050
690
050
200
600
640
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOb-TOT
TOTAL OkTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
.150
.290
.100
.048
.035
.006
.018
.027
.023
.031
.044
.17b
.026
.027
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.007
.014
.019
.019
.010
.006
.009
.005K
.005K
.005K
.011
.017
.013
.010
MG/L P
0.029
0.050
0.048
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.02b
0.030
0.042
0.035
0.045
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TU BE
LESS THAN INuICrtTEi)
-------
STORET rtETKIEV/AL DATE 75/02/04
260350 PR260350 P004000
42 32 OU.O 085 51 30.0
ALLEGAN
26 15 ALLEGAN
U/LAKE ALLEGAN
LAKE ALLEGAN
HEPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/01/30
CP-
73/01/30
73/02/2H
CP(T>-
73/02/28
73/03/29
CPITI-
73/03/29
73/07/05
CP-
73/07/05
63/08/01
CP(T)-
73/07/31
73/09/06
CP(T)-
73/09/06
73/10/04
CP(T)-
73/10/0^
73/10/31
CP(T>-
73/10/31
73/12/04
C" (Tl-
73/12/04
74/01/23
CP(T)-
74/ol/23
74/02/03
CP(T)-
74/02/03
74/03/11
CP(T>-
74/03/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
08 00
17 00
08 00
16 00
00 00
03 00
00 00
08 00
00 00
07 00
07 00
15 00
07 00
16 00
08 00
16 00
07 00
16 00
08 00
16 00
07 00
16 00
07 00
14 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.420
0.2SO
0.180
0.250
0.170
0.090
0.260
0.390
1.320
0.640
0.040
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
31.500
29.^00
24.000
25.500
21 .000
29.400
44.000
35.300
19.000
30.000
17.000
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-FOT FLOW CONDUIT
TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw-MGD
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P 1NST MGO MONTHLY
5.900
6.000
1.680
3.645 11.750 0.475 0.542
8.100 3.300
17.UOO 4.100
6.600
8.300
l.dOO 4.'
0.050K O.OSOK
0.448 0.409
3.700 6.400 0.741 0.536
8.700 3.210 7.500 0.458
7.300 3.300 b.tiu 0.650
0.449
5.700 1.300 7.230 0.424 0.525
0.457 0.448
0.800 0.500
0.580
0.616 0.560
2.160 3.750 0.983 0.650
3.840 6.500 0.775 0.748
0.926 0.890
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKcT KcTKJEv/Al DA It 75/02/j<»
P083800
^^ lo 30. u Odb 3t 30. 0
^ALA^tA/.00
£6 /.b KALAMAZOO
ALUtbAN
0000 FtET DEPTH
OAFt
Frtoix
To
73/01/15
CP(T>-
73/01/ lo
73A/2/20
CP ( T ) -
1 j/v/2/ 2 1
7 3/0 3/ 1 4
CP(T)-
73/03/14
73/04/ 1 ^
CP(T)-
7 3/ J4/ i,?
7j/-jo/ .71 006b5 5oO
al 50053
I1ME Oc-PTH i^02NN03 TuT KJEL i^hj-N PhOS-L)i5 PhOa-TOT FLOW
OF
JAY
00
24
07
07
UO
24
oO
24
00
P4
JO
«;•+
00
2-*
00
24
"J-TOTAL
Fi^ET Mtj/L
00
0 .055
00
00
0.03S
00
00
J.04J
00
00
w .04b
00
no
>. . 0 4 O
CO
00
'J.11J
•00
00
.1.035
00
00
0.320
00
N TOTAL UnJTHO KA!
MG/t. Mb/L HG/L P MG/L P 1NS[
Ih.ouO 1.790 0.550 1.900 31.
32.^0y 1.6«U 0.340 3.bOO 31.
22.uiJO 1.26U d.340 I.v5o 31*.
iH.OjO 1.300 0.4VO 1.75u 32.
13.i-0i, u.3oo 0.1-^5 i.OOJ 32.
??.:JOv 1.4fjO 0.440 1.200 33.
1M.OOO 0.610 0.550 1.3fa5 33.
19. -3i)0 .^.Ooo 0.550 o.BBj 2H.
t
MGU
7ou
ttOO
300
300
900
200
200
7JO
CONDUIT
FLO*
MONI
32
30
31
31
3D
3^
30
30
-MtiO
HLY
.400
.200
.600
.900
.100
.100
.100
.bOO
-------
KtTKIEVAL UAlt 7o/02/0<*
UAft TIME
FKOM OF
TO DAY FtET
00630 00625
N02&N03 TOT KJtL
N-TOTAL IM
MG/L MG/L
73/01/2S
CP(T)-
73/01/25
73/02/20
CP(T>-
73/02/20
73/OJ/3U
CP(T)-
73/03/30
73/04/17
CPU) -
73/OW1 7
73/Ot>/lb
(XT) -
7 j/o5/ 1 b
73/07/12
CP U) -
7J/C7/12
73/Jrf/l 7
CH(T)-
7j/Jd/17
73/09/13
CPIT)-
7o/09/ U
73/10/12
c*-1 ( n -
7j/lo/12
7.-
7J/11/20
73/12/Ob
cu ( r > -
7 j/ 1 tVOo
7^/t I/2J
Od
16
od
15
08
Ib
od
15
oa
Ib
0«
Ib
03
Ib
Oe
Ib
03
1^
OH
Ib
OH
lo
o»
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
CO
00
00
00
oo
00
no
Oo
00
00
00
uU
36.000 25. COO
u.300 25.000
0.7SO 21.000
O.**20 24.000
o. loJ 21 .UOO
0.3oO 17.200
o.d20 12.000
o . 2oO 15. "00
0.32J 1-t.DJo
j.bOO 21.000
0 . 3 1 j 1 * . o o U
2603b2 TF260352 P003915
n2 27 30.0 085 42 30.0
orst'GO
26 7.5 OTSEGO
T/LAi^E AULEjAN
KALAMA200 KIVEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
GJ610 00671 00665 5oi)51 50053
NHJ-N HrtOS-OIS PMOS-TOT FLO* CONJUIT
TOTAL OMTHO HATE FLOx-MGO
•Mu/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
8.550 13.100 0./10 0.700
H.OOO
6.100
• 600
l.tbo
7.000 10.SOO 0.691 0.710
b.doo o.aoo
j.200 ^.700 t-.lOO 0.305
10t
o.cOO
0.710
n.OOO 10.300 0.743 O.bdO
b.bOO e.7uo 0.793 0.710
o.oOO a.3du 0.780 0.750
0.000 ii.329 0.830
tt.650 0.721 0.800
0.600
b.JOJ 7.'300 0.726 0.720
o.boo 0.7no 0. 700
0.7dO 0.770
7<*/Ol/23 Ib UO
-------
P00391b
*d cl JO.O Oba *d 30.u
ct> 7.0 orsi-ibo
1 iLHALti
<+ 0000 FttT DEPTH
>') 0 ^ ? S
I L! T rt J P. L
N
•1G/L
D . D 1 0
I'N rl X — N
i u r AL
Mii/L
D 0 1> 7 1
PnUb-Uib
UrTliJ
I'li^/L P
Ui)6bb
PhUb-TOT
Mb/L P
buubl
FLO'//
KATt
INST MGD
SOOS3
COiMuUif
FLO(tf-MGi
MOMIHLr
i.L'&3o
TI'IE DtPlH i-jO>slvJ03
Of M-IOfAL
TU L)At KttT MG/l.
UB CO
L.i^ovi ?0.-JOO J..1UO o.O'JO 7.^00 0.800 0.7*0
lo 00
-------
KtTP,ltVAL
L>£Tt TIME Utr'TH mJr.j,
1 ( r > -
C^CD-
FKUM i.
Tu u<
73/01/31 00 CO
OP(r)-
73/01/31 2^ CO
Ij/Ud./?.! UO 00
cv (r) -
no
00
00
00
73/U//1? oO 00
CP (T) -
7 J/ 07/1^ 2« 00
c1-* 00
00 00
• <* ^ u
'. 100
0.3b3 0.3^*1
7.JOO 0.355
. 7 o 0
l.loo'
1.750
6 . U 0 U
3.JOO
^. 10U
U.365 0.3'*9
U.371 0.355
o . Jbb
U.J17
0.330
-------
bTlH£T KtVrViEvAL
DATE 1 Irtt DEPTH r
F-iOM OF .M-TOTAL
Tu uAY FEET
006?5
Tol'
73/ol/2> On 00
7 C
M.J/L
17.
J36-* TK26035'*
27 00.0 085 39 00.0
7.3 OSTtGO
P003020
0000 FE£T DEPTH
'•!j/L
73/0 1/2J
73/02/22
Ct-m-
73/02/22
73/0<+/Os
CHI T)-
73/u<*/05
7 j/uD/02
O < T > -
7 j/ Ob/ 02
73/06/0-*
CHI t )-
7 J/u6/0->
73/07/Ob
C'-' ( T ) -
73/07/u?
73/06/03
CH (T ) -
73/ve/U o
73/ J9/0^
Ct-M D-
73/u-*/oi»
73/10/Ul
Co IT) -
7j/ 10/01
73/1 1/01
C"> ( ( ) -
73/11/01
73/ li/Ob
CP( I )-
I •>/ UVuS
7 !. / u 1 / 0 •»
tv ( r ) -
7-/ J1/0-*
lo
00
16
uu
Ob
00
Ot!
O.-t
16
0?
16
08
16
OB
16
OH
16
tin
16
Od
ib
tj •*
i*
00
00
U • £ J J c D • e 0 J 1 1 • U 0 0
00
00
<* . 1 u 0 - . v' 0 0 u . >» 3 U
oo
ao
0.61-j Ir.l'GO S.JUO
00
Ou
j . D i j 1 tr . i; 0 *, 1 . 1 J v,1
00
00
•J.31J 23.fjo O.Ctlv;
OU
00
0.2?* 2*. .,00 T.I-*-;
00
00
c . 0 3 r' 2 v) . 'j 0 u
00
00
i'.23u 19.0 JO -'. 73-j
00
Ou
C. . 2 T u 3 u . v.1 0'o 1 1. . 2 o v
00
00
i; . 3r>v.' 2^! . t i':0 -. _'UC
OU
Ot'
J. 3 f^ i .'.v.'.:.. :-. 1 Oif
00
OOo/l ou6o5 boOSl 50053
i-nUi-uIS PnUi-tuT FLOw CUNUUIT
u-?Tid KATt FLOK-MoU
.V|0/L f Mb/L r1 INST M(3L) MONTHLY
3.100 3.200 O.b28 0.to<+9
V.uOO 0.358
0.792 u.620
3.12S H.t>0t> O.bOu 0.631
0.60d
2. 1 o 0
O. DUO
0.100 0.7U7
0.372
0.-+07
/.100 0.3:30 0.382
>.10J 0.5tO
-------
JATc
i!<>03b4 Tl-^b03b4 P003020
*£ dt 00.0 085 jy 00.0
KLAllMWtLL
tb 7.b GbTEGO
i/LAKt ALLcljAiN
0000 FEET DEPTH
JOh3'J OOb^b vjjblO OwbVi Ofbbb bOObl
UATt TIMf-; Ut^TH NU^MMUJ ToT KJ.-.L NH j-:V( PnOs-iJlS PnOb-TOr FLOW CONOOIT
FKOM OF is-TulAL N 101'AL (j* \ HO KATt! FLOw-MGD
TO DAY FtET MU/L Mi.,/1. M^.i/L MG/L H MO/L H liMST MGQ MONThLr
U H 0 0
O.b^4 O.Stiti
16 00
------- |