U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKEFINSON
LEONCOIMY
FLORIDA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 268
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKEMUNSON
LEONCOIMY
FLORIDA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 268
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
AND THE
FLORIDA NATIONAL GUARD
DECEMBER,, 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword ii
List of Florida Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)]5 water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c}], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise., multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
irj the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Florida Department of Environ-
mental Regulation for professional involvement and to the Florida
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey.
Joseph W. Landers, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Environ-
mental Regulation; John A Redmond, former Director of the Division
of Planning, Technical Assistance, and Grants; and Dr. Tim S. Stuart,
Chief of the Bureau of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake docu-
mentation and counsel during the survey, reviewed the preliminary
reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Henry W. McMillan (Retired), then the Adjutant
General of Florida, and Project Officer Colonel Hugo F. Windham,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Florida National Guard,
are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF FLORIDA
LAKE NAME
Alligator
Apopka
Banana
Crescent
Doctors
Dora
East Tohopekaliga
Effie
Eloise
George
Gibson
Glenada
Griffin
Haines
Hancock
Horseshoe
Howe!1
Istokpoga
Jessie
Jess up
Kissinimee
Lawne
Lulu
Marion
Jtinnehaha
Minneola
Monroe
Munson
Okeechobee
Poinsett
Reedy
Seminole
Semi nole
South
Talquin
Tarpon
Thonotosassa
Tohopekaliga
Trout
Heohyakapka
Yale
COUNTY
Columbia
Lake, Orange
Polk
Flagler, Putnam
Clay
Lake
Osceola
Polk
Polk
Putnam, Volusia
Polk
Highlands
Lake
Pol k
Polk
Semi no!e
Orange> Seminole.
Highlands
Polk
Seminole
Osceola
Orange
Pol k
Polk
Orange
Lake
Seminole, Volusia
Leon
Glades, Heridry, Martin,
Okeechobee„ Palm Beach
Brevard, Orange, Osceola
Polk
Jackson, FL; Decatur,
Seminole, GA
Pinellas
Brevard
Gadsden, Leon
Pinellas
Hillsborough
Osceola
Lake
Polk
Lake
-------
Lake
Bradford
LAKE MUNSON
® Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
f Sewage Treatment Facility
Scale
J Km.
Mi.
84 22
84°20
Q
LAKE
MUNSON
30°28'
30°22-
84°16
-------
LAKE MUNSON
STORE! NO. 1247
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and a report by others (Ketelle and Uttormark,
1971) indicate that Lake Munson is hypereutrophic. It ranked
39th in overall trophic quality when the 41 Florida lakes
sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six lake
parameters*. Thirty-seven of the lakes had less median total
phosphorus and mean chlorophyll a^ 35 had less median dissolved
phosphorus, 38 had less median inorganic nitrogen, and 37 had
greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
The limited Survey data indicate diurnal fluctuation of
dissolved oxygen (D.O.) may be a problem in this lake. The
early-to mid-afternoon near-surface D.O. concentrations ranged
from about 175% to nearly 220% of saturation in June and August,
but similar samples taken at mid-morning in November ranged
from 30% of saturation at station 2 to 73% at station 1. More
intensive sampling is needed to determine whether nocturnal
depression of D.O. is significant.
Survey limnologists noted emergent and floating vegetation
at all stations in June and August and at station 2 in November.
Also, phytoplankton blooms were noted at both stations in August,
and clumps of filamentous blue-green algae were observed at station
See Appendix A.
-------
2
1 in November.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate the lake was nitrogen limited
at the time the sample was collected (06/20/73). The lake data
indicate nitrogen limitation at all sampling stations and times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The apparent loss of both phosphorus and
nitrogen during the sampling year (pages 10 and 11) indicates
the non-point nutrient contributions were underestimated; e.g.,
because of presumed insignificant runoff from the immediate
drainage (Mann, 1975), nutrient contributions from that source
were considered to be negligible (page 9). However, assuming
the total nutrient inputs were at least equal to the loads leaving
the lake, it is estimated the two Tallahassee wastewater treat-
ment plants contributed about 46% of the total phosphorus and 44%
of the total nitrogen inputs to the lake.
Based on the outlet load, the sampling year phosphorus loading
was nearly 102 g/m2, or about 74 times that proposed by Vollen-
weider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic rate (see
page 12). However, Vollenweider's model probably is not appli-
cable to water bodies with short hydraulic retention times, and
the estimated mean hydraulic retention time of Lake Munson is
only 11 days.
Even complete removal of phosphorus at the Tallahassee plants
would still leave an estimated loading of 55 g/m2/yr; and, regard-
-------
3
less of the applicability of the model, it is not likely that
the reduction of phosphorus inputs attainable by municipal
point-source control alone would result in a significant change
in the trophic condition of the lake.
The very high in-lake concentrations of inorganic nitrogen
(mean = 1.740 mg/1) and orthophosphorus (mean = 0.907 mg/1)
during Survey sampling indicate major reductions of both nutri-
ents would be necessary to improve the trophic condition of Lake
Munson.
2. Non-point sources—On the basis of the outlet loads, it is
estimated that non-point sources contributed about 54% of the
total phosphorus and 56% of the total nitrogen inputs to Lake
Munson. The 1972 U.S.G.S. Lake Munson and Tallahassee quadrangle
maps indicate urban runoff from the City of Tallahassee probably
contributes nutrients to the lake.
The phosphorus export of Unnamed Stream B-l was a high 193
kg/km2 during the sampling year. The high rate may have resulted
from underestimation of the Tallahassee loads (0.78 kg P/capita/yr
at the plants), urban drainage, or both.
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
4-J.
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 1.03 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 1.5 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 2.0 meters.
4. Volume: 1.545 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 11 days (based on outlet flow),
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)ttt (m3/sec)ttt
Unnamed Creek B-l 158.0 1.75
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 8.1 0.00*
Totals 166.1 1.75
2. Outlet -
Bradford Brook 167.1** 1.67
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 208.0 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 144.4 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt No bathymetric map available. Surface area from FL Game & Fresh Water
Fish Comm. (Anonymous, 1971); depths estimated from soundings reported
in Appendix D.
ttt For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
* Runoff assumed to be insignificant; lake is in a sink area (Mann, 1975).
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Munson was sampled three times in 1973 by means of a
pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, near-surface samples
for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two stations
on the lake and, the third time, from one additional depth at each
station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-inte-
grated (near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations
for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll ^analysis. The maximum depths
sampled were 0.6 meters at station 1 and 0.3 meters at station 2.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (o
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02+N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/D
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 6/20/73)
2 SITES
RANGE
28.2
13.8
135.
9.1
36.
1.140
0.820
0.280
0.200
2.800
0.480
3.080
108.6
0.3
- 29.1
- 17.1
- 145.
9.4
43.
- 1.180
- 0.885
- 0.380
- 0.850
- 3.100
- 1.230
- 3.480
- 184.9
0.5
MEAN
28.6
15.4
140.
9.2
40.
1.160
0.852
0.330
0.525
2.950
0.855
3.260
146.7
0.4
MEDIAN
28.6
15.4
140.
9.2
40.
1.160
0.852
0.330
0.525
2.950
0.855
3.280
146.7
0.4
MEAN MEDIAN
30.2 30.2
16.0
203.
10.3
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR LAKE MUNSON
STORET CODE 1247
2ND SAMPLING ( 8/30/73)
2 SITES
RANGE
29.2 - 31.2
16.0 - 16.0
202. - 204.
10.1 - 10.5
44. - 48.
1.470 - 1.480
0.600 - 0.620
0.300 - 0.320
0.140 - 0.300
3.600 - 3.800
0.440 - 0.620
3.900 - 4.120
115.6 - 179.2
46.
1.475
16.0
203.
10.3
46.
1.475
0.610 0.610
0.310 0.310
0.220
0.220
3.700 3.700
0.530 0.530
4.010 4.010
147.4 147.4
3RD SAMPLING ill/ 5/73)
2 SITES
0.4 -
0.4
0.4
0.4
RANGE
19.3 - 20.5
2.8 - 6.6
325. - 349.
8.2 - 8.7
102. - 112.
2.060 - 4.110
1.930 - 2.090
0.760 - 0.860
2.250 - 3.800
6.800 - 9.600
3.010 - 4.660
7.560 -10.460
125.0 - 128.6
0.3 - 0.3
MEAN
19.9
4.7
337.
8.4
107.
3.085
2.010
0.810
3.025
8.200
3.835
9.010
126.8
0.3
MEDIAN
19.9
4.7
337.
8.4
107.
3.085
2.010
0.810
3.025
8.200
3.835
9.010
126.8
0.3
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
06/20/73
08/30/73
11/05/73
2. Chlorophyll £ -
Samp!i ng
Date
06/20/73
08/30/73
11/05/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Flagellates
2. Cryptomonas sp.
3. Cyclotella s£.
4. Microcystis sp.
5. Kirchneriella sp.
Other genera
Total
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Anabaena sp.
Microcystis sp.
Scenedesmus sp.
Raphidiopsis sp.
Merismopecha sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Anabaena sp.
2. Flagellates
3. Chrysococcus sp.
4. Chlamydomonas sp.
5. Cyclotella sp.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1 •
2
1
2
1
2
Algal Units
per ml
4,
3,
2,
1,
021
251
823
540
1,112
5,818
18,565
4,033
1,589
1,589
1,344
1,059
2,361
11,975
40,425
21,432
12,448
11,422
6,288
12,702
104,717
Chlorophyll a
108.6
184.9
179.2
115.6
125.0
128.6
-------
8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.780
0.830
0.830
0.780
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
1.565
1.565
2.565
2.565
42.1
41.5
62.9
67.7
2. Filtered and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
0.710
0.760
0.760
0.710
1.510
1.510
2.510
2.510
42.7
38.3
59.9
69.7
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
3. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum. indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Lake Munson was very high at the time the assay sample was
collected (06/20/73). The lack of yield response with increased
levels of orthophosphorus, until nitrogen was also added, indi-
cates that the lake was limited by nitrogen at that time. Note
that the addition of nitrogen alone resulted in a yield greater
than that of the control.
The mean lake inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus ratios
are further evidence of nitrogen limitation (2 to 1 or less at
all sampling stations and times).
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Florida National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v). Sampling was begun in
March, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Florida District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Estimates of nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and
immediate drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were not made because the lake
essentially is a sink at or just above the water table most of the
time (Mann, 1975).
The operators of the Tallahassee wastewater treatment plants (Dale
Mabry Field and Lake Bradford Road) provided monthly effluent samples
and corresponding flow data.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Name
Pop.
Served
Treatment
Mean Flow
(m'/d)
Tallahassee -
Lake Bradford 50,400
Road
Dale Mabry 11,500
Field
act. sludge 19,665.2
act. sludge 3,410.0
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Source
kg P/
yr
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Unnamed Creek B-l 30,440
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - none
c. Known municipal STP's -
Lake Bradford Road
Dale Mabry Field
d. Septic tanks - None
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** -
Total
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Bradford Brook
3. Net annual P loss - 26,235 kg.
37,795
10,220
45
78,500
104,735
* Treatment plant questionnaires.
** Brezonik and Shannon, 1971.
Receiving
Water
Unnamed Creek B-l
Unnamed Creek B-l
% of
total
38.8
48.1
13.0
0.1
100.0
-------
n
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Unnamed Creek B-l 81,545 38.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - none
c. Known municipal STP's -
Lake Bradford Road 107,505 50.3
Dale Mabry Field 24,010 11.2
d. Septic tanks - None
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 595 0.3
Total 213,655 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Bradford Brook 296,815
3. Net annual N loss - 83,160 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Unnamed Creek B-l 193 516
* Brezonik and Shannon, 1971.
-------
12
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Note, however, that Florida lakes may be
able to assimilate phosphorus at a somewhat higher level than
that suggested by Vollenweider (Shannon and Brezonik, 1972).
Essentially, Vollenweider's "dangerous" loading is one
at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain
eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which would result
in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading
would be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to water bodies
with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 76.21 loss* 207.4 loss*
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on estimated mean depth and
hydraulic retention time of Lake Munson:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 1.38
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.69
* There was an apparent loss of nutrients during the sampling year. This may
have been due to nutrient fixation in the lake, solubilization of previously
sedimented nutrients, significant contributions from the immediate drainage,
or (probably) insufficient outlet sampling in relation to the short hydraulic
retention time of the lake.
-------
13
LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Water quality investigations - 1970-71 annual
progress report. Fed. Aid in Fish Restor., Dingell-Johnson
Proj. No. F-21-5, FL Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm., Tallahassee.
Brezonik, Patrick L. and Earl E. Shannon, 1971. Trophic state of
lakes in north central Florida. Publ. No. 13, FL Water Resources
Res. Ctr., U. of FL, Gainesville.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes
in the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser., Proj.
No. 16010 EHR, Wash., DC.
Mann, William, 1975. Personal communication ("ZZ" flows; subsurface
seepage). U.S. Geol. Surv., Tallahassee.
Shannon, Earl E., and Patrick L. Brezonik, 1972. Relationships
between lake trophic state and nitrogen and phosphorus loading
rates. Env. Sci. & Techn. 6^ (8): 719-725.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
14
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LA^E
CODE
1201
1202
1203
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
121)
1212
121-
1215
1217
1219
1220
1221
122J
1224
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
123-
1230
1238
1239
LAKE
NAME
ALLIGATOR LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
APOPKA
BANANA
CRESCENT
DOCTORS LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
DORA
EFFIE
GEORGE
GIdSON
GLENAOA LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
GRIFFIN
HAINES
HANCOCK
HORSESHOE
HOKELL
ISTOKPOGA
JF.SSUP
KISSIMMEt
LULU
MARION
MINNErlAHA
MINNEOLA
MONROE
OKEECHOdEE
POINSETT
PFEOY
SOUTH
TALOUIN
MEDUN
TOTAL P
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
620
10?
660
Ob5
084
10?
480
129
167
134
1 19
063
772
034
260
039
49?
034
490
044
03R
018
138
063
065
033
074
065
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.260
0.230
0.260
0.130
0.120
0.240
0.410
0.165
0.115
0.165
0.260
0.115
0.195
0.130
0.285
0.120
0.290
0.145
1.065
0.260
0.080
0.070
0.300
0.185
O.lSO
0.330
0.130
0.290
500-
MEAN StC
474.
484.
482.
473.
465.
482.
489.
469.
470.
454.
481.
462.
483.
459.
464.
464.
487.
463.
483.
468.
435.
406.
474.
472.
-69.
468.
464.
462.
000
H6
667
889
555
889
000
308
000
167
333
667
500
000
000.
222
000
667
000
833
000
333
,555
,366
,000
500
000
167
MEAN
67
4b
208
10
27
59
261
35
19
27
66
26
97
12
54
6
76
24
276
29
8
3
14
14
6
34
23
4
.733
.611
.600
.211
.100
.978
.433
.000
.675
.667
.855
.567
.900
.067
.117
.594
.550
.142
.566
.967
.733
.333
.225
.524
.500
.837
.167
.483
15-
MIN DO
13.100
8.200
3.600
10.200
10.600
7.400
15.000
11.000
10.200
14.700
6.600
10.600
5.600
11.500
9.000
8.600
7.600
8.800
14.300
7.600
7.700
7.400
10.600
9.800
10.600
10.600
9.000
14.400
MEOK
DISS ORTr
0.386
0.019
0.293
0.033
0.028
0.022
0.950
0.063
0.069
0.072
0.038
0.014
0.158
0.023
1.175
0.010
0.288
0.007
1.030
0.016
0.012
0.009
0.12H
0.010
O.Osl
0.008
0.028
0.031
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
CU3E LAKE NJME
1240 LAKE THONOTOSASSA
1241 LAKE TOHOPEKALIOA
1242 TROUT LAKE
1243 LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA
1246 LAKE YALE
1247 LAKE MUNSON
1248 LAKE SEMINOLE
1249 LAKE LArfNE
1250 LAKE TARPON
1252 LAKE ELOISE
1258 LAKE JESSIE
1261 EAST LAKE TOMOPEKALIGA
1264 PAYNE'S PWAIRIE LAKE (NO
MEDIAN
TOT4L P
0.695
0.246
1.110
0.047
0.027
1.475
0.234
?.560
0.041
0.486
0.051
0.042
1.260
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.095
0.200
0.650
0.080
0.160
0.925
0.175
1.350
0.070
0.170
0.090
0.070
0.140
500-
MEAN SEC
466.167
472.917
472.000
458.667
441.000
486.667
473.833
494.667
400.889
465.333
<»52.667
440.833
476.000
MEAN
CHLORA
37.700
30.633
76.967
7.767
25.367
140.317
102.000
84.900
6.867
70.233
26.300
5.167
38.200
15-
MIN 00
10.200
10.500
12.900
8.200
7.600
12.200
8.600
10.400
9.000
12.200
10.800
9.400
7.400
MEDIAN
DISS OrtTHO P
0.565
0.152
0.970
0.011
0.014
0.852
0.026
0.117
O.U27
0.339
0.011
0.007
1.210
-------
OF LAKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES »ITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
1201
1302
1203
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1214
121S
1217
1219
1220
1221
1223
1224
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
123*
. 1236
1238
1239
LAKE NAME
ALLIGATOR LAKE
LAKE APOPKA
LAKE BANANA
LAKE CPESCENT
DOCTORS LAKE
LAKE OOHA
LAKE EFFIE
LAKE GEORGE
LAKE GIBSON
GLENADA LAKE
LAKE GRIFFIN
LAKE HAINES
LAKE HANCOCK
LAKL HORSESHOE
LAKE HOWELL
LAKE ISTOKPOGA
LAKE JF.SSUP
LAKE KISSIMMEE
LAKE LULU
LAKE MARION
LAKE MINNE^AHA
LAKE MINNEOLA
LAKE MONROE
LAKE OKEECHOdEE
LAKE OQINSETT
LAKE KEEDr
LAKE SOUTH
LAKE TALOUIN
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
25 (
50 <
23 (
65 (
60 I
S3 (
5 (
45 I
40 (
43 (
4P (
70 (
18 (
93 (
11 (
85 (
28 <
90 (
3 (
78 1
8rt (
100 I
SB (
68 (
58 (
95 (
63 (
55 (
10)
20)
9)
26)
24)
21)
2)
16)
16)
17)
19)
28)
7)
37)
4)
34)
111
361
1)
31)
35)
40)
151
271
23)
36)
25)
22)
MEDIAN
iNOr'G N
29
38
29
70
76
35
10
54
81
54
29
81
43
10
23
76
1«
63
3
29
91
98
15
45
60
13
70
20
( 10)
( 151
( 10)
( 27)
( 301
( 14)
( 41
( 21)
( 32)
< 211
( 10)
( 321
( 17)
I 271
I 9)
( 301
( 7)
1 25)
( 1)
( 10)
( 36)
( 38)
( 6)
( 18)
( 24)
( 5)
( 27)
( 81
500-
MtiN SEC
30
10
20
33
60
18
3
48
45
85
23
75
13
dO
6V
65
5
73
15
53
95
98
2«
40
50
55
69
78
( 12)
( 4)
1 8)
I 13)
( 24)
( 7)
< 1)
( 19)
( 18)
I 34)
( 9)
( 30)
( 5)
( 321
( 27)
( 26)
( 2)
( 29)
( 6)
( 21)
( 38)
( J9I
( 11)
( 16)
( 20)
( 22)
( 27)
( 311
MEAN
CHLORA
18 (
38 <
5 (
60 (
55 (
33 (
3 (
43 (
70 (
53 (
30 (
58 (
13 (
78 (
35 (
93 (
25 (
05 (
0 1
bO (
85 (
100 (
/5 (
73 (
95 (
45 (
68 (
83 I
7)
151
2)
32)
22)
131
1)
17)
28)
21)
12)
23)
51
31)
14)
37)'
10)
26)
0)
20)
34)
40)
30)
291
38)
16)
27)
33)
15-
MIN 00
10
74
100
48
34
90
0
23
48
3
95
34
98
20
60
69
83
65
8
83
78
90
26
53
34
34
60
5
( 4)
( 29)
( 401
( 18)
( 12)
( 35)
( 0)
( 9)
( 18)
( 1)
( 38)
( 12)
( 39)
( 8>
( 23)
< 27)
( 32)
( 26)
I 3)
( 32)
( 31)
( 35)
( 10)
( 21)
( 12)
( 12)
< 23)
1 21
MEDIAN
OISS OrfTnO V
18
70
23
SO
56
68
10
43
40
38
48
78
28
65
3
89
25
99
5
73
80
93
33
89
45
95
56
53
i n
( 28)
( 9)
( 20)
( 22)
( 27)
( 4)
( 17)
< 16)
( 15)
( 19)
< 31)
1 11)
( 26)
( 1)
( 35)
( 10)
( 39)
( 21
( 29)
( 321
( 371
I 131
( 35)
I 18)
( 38)
( 221
1 211
INUE»
NO
1JU
2au
200
346
341
297
31
256
324
276
273
396
213
406
201
477
Ib4
4:>S
34
366
S17
479
21b
368
3»2
33 /
3d6
294
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES INUMBM OF LAKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
1240
1241
1242
121.3
1246
1247
1248
12<.9
1250
1252
1258
1261
126«
LAKt NAME
LAKE THONOTOSASSA
LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA
THOUT LAKE
LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA
LAKE YALE
LAKE MUNSON
LAKE SEMINOLE
LAKE LAWNE
LAKE TARPON
LAKE ELOISE
LAKE JESSIE
EAST LAKE TOMOPEKALIGA
PAYNE'S PKAIWIE LAKE (NO
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
20 (
33 I
l'S (
75 (
9B (
8 (
35 (
0 I
83 (
30 I
73 (
80 (
11 <
8)
13)
6)
33)
39)
3)
14)
0)
33)
12)
29)
321
4)
MEDIAN
1N03G N
85
40
8
91
58
5
48
0
98
50
tJ8
98
65
( 34 1
( 16)
< 3)
I 36)
( 23)
( 2)
I 19)
( 0)
( 38)
( 20)
( 35i
( 38)
( 26)
500-
MEAN
58
38
43
83
90
8
3b
0
100
63
88
93
25
SEC
( 23)
( 15)
( 17)
( 331
( 36)
< 3)
( 14)
( 0)
( 40)
( 25)
( 35)
I 37)
( 10)
MEAN
CHLOKA
40
48
23
dB
63
a
10
20
90
2d
60
98
IS
( 16)
1 191
( 9)
( 35)
( 25)
( 3)
( 4)
I 8)
( 36)
( 11)
( 24)
( 39)
( 61
15-
M1N UO
48 (
40 (
13 I
74 (
83 (
16 (
69 (
43 <
60 (
16 (
26 <
55 (
90 (
18)
16)
5)
29)
J2>
6)
27)
17)
23)
6)
10)
22)
3b>
MEOIAN
OISS OKTriO P
15
30
8
84
75
13
6J
35
60
20
84
99
0
( 6)
( 12)
I 3)
( 33)
( 30)
( 5)
( 25)
( 14)
( 24)
( 8)
( 33)
( 39)
( 0)
INUEX
NO
266
229
110
495
<.67
58
260
98
491
207
419
523
206
-------
LAKES RANKED Br INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
i 1230 LAKE MINNEOLA 579
2 1261 EAST LAKE TOriOPEKALIGA 523
3 1229 LAKE MINNEHAHA 517
* 12*3 LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA 495
5 1250 LAKE TARPON 491
6 1221 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 477
7 12*6 LAKE YALE 467
8 1224 LAKE KISS1MMEE 455
9 1258 LAKE JESSIE 419
10 1219 LAKE HORSESHOE 406
11 1215 LAKE HAINES 396
12 1238 LAKE SOUTH 386
13 1232 LAKE OKEECHOBEE 368
14 1228 LAKE MARION 366
15 1206 LAKE CRESCENT 346
16 1234 LAKE POINSETT 342
17 1207 DOCTORS LAKE 341
18 1236 LAKE REEDr 337
19 1211' LAKE GIBSON 3?4
20 1208 LAKE DORA 297
21 1239 LAKE TALOUIN 294
22 1202 LAKE APOPKA 280
23 1212 GLENADA LAKE 276
24 1214 LAKE GRIFFIN 273
25 1240 LAKE THONOTOSASSA 266
26 1248 LAKE SEMINOLE 260
27 1210 LAKE GEORGE 256
28 1241 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 229
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
39 1231 LAKE MONROE 315
30 1217 LAKE HANCOCK 213
31 1352 LAKE EL01SE 307
32 136* PAYNE'S PRAIRIE LAKE (NO 206
33 1220 LAKE HOHELL 201
34 1203 LAKE BANANA 200
35 1223 LAKE JESSUP 184
36 1201 ALLIGATOR LAKE 130
37 1242 TROUT LAKE 110
38 1249 LAKE LAWNE 98
39 1247 LAKE MUNSON 58
40 1227 LAKE LULU 34
41 1309 LAKE EFFIE 31
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 "^ = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 - cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR FLORIDA
10/23/75
LAKE CODE 1247
LAKE MUNSON
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE (SO KM)
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAfSQ KM)
1247A1 167.1
1247B1 158.0
1247ZZ 8.0
JAN
1.73
1.81
0.0
FEB
2.15
2.24
0.0
167.
MAR
2.61
2.69
0.0
1
APR
2.63
2.72
0.0
MAY
1.50
1.59
0.0
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
1.30
1.39
0.0
1.42 1.56
1.50 1.64
0.0 0.0
SEP
1.42
1.50
0.0
OCT
1.25
1.33
0.0
NOV
1.10
1.19
0.0
DEC
1.42
1.50
0.0
MEAN
1.67
1.75
0.0
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
167.1
166.0
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
21.10
20.08
NOTE »«« LAKE IS IN A SINK AREA AT OR ABOVE THE WATER TABLE MOST OF THE TIME
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
1247A1
MEAN FLOW DAY
1247B1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
3.94
8.66
2.63
1.95
0.93
1.59
1.73
0.65
1.05
0.99
2.10
2.12
4.02
8.75
2.72
2.04
1,02
1.67
1.81
0.74
1.13
1.08
2.18
2.21
17
13
17
15
13
17
14
12
16
14
18
15
17
13
17
15
13
17
14
12
16
14
18
15
FLOW DAY
2.63
3.54
1.39
2.35
0.79
2.21
1.08
0.57
0.71
0.62
1.13
1.30
2.72
3.62
1.47
2.44
0.88
2.29
1.19
0.6b
0.79
0.71
1.22
1.39
FLOW DAY
FLOW
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR FLORIDA
10/23/75
LAKE CODE 1247
LAKE MUNSON
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
1247ZZ
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
MEAN FLOW DAY
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
17
13
17
15
13
17
14
12
16
14
18
15
FLOW DAY
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
FLOW DAY
FLOW
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/06/25
124701
30 22 14.0 084 18 47.0
LAKE MUNSON
12073 FLORIDA
00010
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT
73/06/20 13 30 0000 29.1
73/08/30 16 15 0000 31.2
73/11/05 09 47 0000 20.5
09 47 0002 20.5
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MIC30MHO
13. 8
6.6
10
15
10
145
204
349
349
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
9.10
10.50
8.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
43
44
112
211
0005
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.850
0.140
3.800
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
3.100
3.600
9.600
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.380
0.300
0.860
00671
PHOS-DIS
OUT HO
MG/L P
0.885
0.620
2.090
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/06/20 13 30 0000 1.180 108.6
73/08/30 16 15 0000 1.480 179.2
73/11/05 09 47 0000 4.110 125.0
-------
5TORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/OB/25
124702
30 21 58.0 084 18 08.0
LAKE MUNSON
12073 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/20
73/08/30
73/11/05
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 50 0000
16 25 0000
09 34 0000
09 34 0001
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
28.2
29.2
19.3
19.3
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
17.1
lb.0
2.8
18
15
12
135
202
325
325
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
9.40
10.10
6.20
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
36
48
102
2111202
0005 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.200
0.300
2.250
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.800
3.800
6.800
00630
N02&N03
N-IOTAL
MG/L
0.280
0.320
0.760
00671
PHOb-OIS
OWTrtO
MG/L P
0.820
0.600
1.930
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH MHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FtET MG/L P UG/L
73/Ob/20 13 50 0000 1.140 18
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
1247A1
30 21 30.0 084 18 00.0
BRADFORD BROOK
12069 15 TALLAHASSEE
0/LAKE MUNSON
bT HwY 61 BRDG S OF LAKE
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM OF
TO DAY
TIME DEPTH
FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/17
73/09/14
73/10/12
73/11/16
73/12/14
74/01/18
74/02/15
08 30
14 10
16 00
09 10
09 10
08 43
09 45
08 45
08 50
10 00
12 10
11 19
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
C.880
0.084
0.160
0.430
0.052
0.310
0.280
0.860
1.200
1.700
1.260
1.76U
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
5.700
2.200
4.400
10.500
4.500
3.000
2.520
3.150
5.250
6.600
4.600
6.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
2.400
0.790
0.170
1.000
1.580
0.920
1.160
0.910
2.760
2.640
2.100
1.250
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
1.580
0.540
0.850
0.585
1.700
1.100
1.040
1.700
2.700
2.400
2.000
2.100
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
2.400
0.830
1.300
0.880
2.300
1.400
1.350
1.720
3.200
2.700
2.900
2.800
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
124781
30 22 30.0 064 19 00.0
UNNAMED STREAM
12 15 TALLAHASSEE
I/LAKE MUNSON
DIRT «D BRDG JUST N OF LAKE
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/17
73/09/14
73/10/12
73/11/16
73/12/14
74/01/18
74/02/15
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
08
14
16
08
09
08
09
09
09
10
12
11
45
20
20
21
?0
49
55
00
05
10
00
09
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
.780
.014
.060
.027
.011
.040
.017
.200
.430
.600
.040
.6bO
MG/L
4
1
6
4
1
2
4
1
3
3
1
4
.600
.380
.800
.200
.150
.800
.900
.550
.750
.850
.400
.800
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
600
084
330
280
037
020
300
490
160
520
135
360
MG/L P
1.700
0.800
1.060
0.840
0.450
0.530
1.000
0.900
2.200
1.840
0.290
1.400
MG/L P
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
0
2
.100
.880
.150
.980
.635
.710
.250
.050
.450
.400
.650
.700
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/C8/2S
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/09
CP(T>-
73/04/09
73/05/09
CPU)-
73/05/09
73/06/26
CP(T>-
73/06/26
73/07/24
CP-
73/07/24
73/08/21
O-
73/08/21
73/09/25
CP(T)-
73/09/25
73/11/07
CP(T)-
73/11/07
73/12/04
CP-
73/12/04
7W02/05
CP(T)-
74/02/05
74/03/05
CP(T>-
74/03/05
74/04/02
CP(T)-
7^/04/02
7^/05/14
CP(T)-
74/05/14
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
08
24
00
16
00
16
08
24
08
12
08
24
08
12
08
24
08
24
08
24
08
24
08
24
FEET
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00630
N026N03
N-TUTAL
MG/L
0.810
9.600
3.800
1.100
5.000
2.730
8.000
5.000
1.920
0.200
0. 120
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
14.700
6.600
9.400
11.500
4.975
12.000
9.100
12.000
16.000
10.000
17.000
1247BA AS1247BA
30 25 30.0 084 18 00.0
TALLAHASSEE (LK BEDFORD PLANT)
12069 15 TALLAHASbtE
T/LAKt MUNSON
UNMAMEO STREAM
P050400
0000 FEET DEPTH
00610 00671 006b5 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT FLOrt CONDUIT
TOTAL GRTHO KATE FLO*-MGO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
5.000 2.600 4.400 5.890 5.260
0.650 3.500 4.100 5.700 5.760
1.400 4.300 4.900 5.450 5.550
3.700 3.100
0.0 04
0.245
2.500 5.300
9.700
b.200
5.450 5.580
4.4*20 5.000 5.060 5.400
2.730 4.500 5.100 5.630
5.000 6.400 4.950
4.600 5.600 5.280
5.070
5.300
6.300 5.220 5.700
4.710 4.330
6.600 <*.700 5.500 5.110 4.630
<».670
4.600 5.500 ^.520 4.b70
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/03/25
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
74/00/03 08 00
CP(T)-
74/06/03 24 00
2.500
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
16.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
7.190
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
4.500
1247BA AS1247BA P050400
30 25 30.0 084 Id 00.0
TALLAHASSEE ILK BEDFORD PLANT)
12069 15 TALLAHASSEE
T/LAKE MUNSON
UNNAMED STREAM
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
5.500
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MGO
5.200
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MOD
MONTHLY
4.750
-------
STOrtET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
1247BB AS1247BB P011500
30 25 30.0 084 18 00.0
DALE MAUKY PLANT)
12 15 TALLAHASSEE
T/LAKE MUNSON
UNNAMED STREAM TALLAHASSEE I
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
FROM OF N-TOTAL N
TO DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
73/04/19 00 00
CP-
73/04/19 16 00
73/05/09 00 00
CP(T)-
73/05/09 16 00
73/06/26 00 00
CP(T>-
73/06/26 16 00
73/07/24 08 00
CP(T>-
73/07/24 24 00
73/08/21 08 00
CP(T>-
73/08/21 12 00
73/09/25 08 00
CP(T>-
73/09/25 24 00
73/11/07 08 00
CPUJ-
73/11/07 12 00
73/12/04 08 00
CP(T)-
73/12/04 24 00
74/02/05 08 00
CP(T>-
74/02/05 24 00
74/03/05 08 00
CPU>-
74/03/05 24 00
74/04/02 08 00
CPUI-
74/04/02 24 00
74/05/14 03 00
CP(T>-
74/OS/14 24 00
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PriOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW-MGD
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGU MONTHLY
0.103 . 17.000
0.120 18.900
0.280 13.800
0.190 17.600
0.770 14.000
C.230 18.900
6.400
5.880
6.700
4.900 6.600
7.100
3.400
3.680
8.900
0.650 23.000
1.200 24.000
1.360 1J.OOO
1.200 '-?0.000
16.000
1.150
6.000 7.600 0.8SO
0.25U 22.000 10.000 8.500 9.800 0.840
1.110
8.500 5.700 6.400 1.200 1.160
0.930 1.070
5.300 8.500 0.720 0.920
0.860
8.900 9.650 0.840 0.860
0.860
15.000 9.100 9.900 0.700 0.850
0.720 0.790
9.400 10.000 0.800 0.770
9.650 6.150 B.OOO 0.640 0.770
10.500 7.600 8.500 0.810 0.780
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/03/25
OCb30
DATE TIME DEPTH N026.N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO OAY FEET MG/L
74/06/03 08 00
CP < T) -
74/06/03 20 00
0.156
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
25.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
13.000
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
6.950
1247BB AS1247BB P011500
30 25 30.0 084 18 00.0
DALE MABKY PLANT)
12 15 TALLAHASSEE
T/LAKE MUNSON
UNNAMED STREAM TALLAHASSEE
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
8.200
50051
FLOW
RATE
1NST M13D
0.850
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MOD
MONTHLY
0.800
------- |