U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE OKECHOBE
GLADES, HENDRY, I Mil
AND PAW BEACH COUNTIES
FLORIDA
EPA REGION IV
».
WORKING PAPER No, 269
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
T^G.P.0. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE
GLADES, HEW, IMTIN,
AND PALM BEACH COUNTIES
FLORIDA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No. 269
o
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Forward ii
List of Florida Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Introduction 1
II. Conclusions 1
III. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
IV. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
V. Nutrient Loadings 11
VI. Literature Reviewed 18
VII. Appendices 19
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements pf relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
V
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)3, clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships betv/een land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Florida Department of Environ-
mental Regulation for professional involvement and to the Florida
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey.
Joseph W. Landers, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Environ-
mental Regulation; John A Redmond, former Director of the Division
of Planning, Technical Assistance, and Grants; and Dr. Tim S. Stuart,
Chief of the Bureau of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake docu-
mentation and counsel during the survey, reviewed the preliminary
reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Henry W. McMillan (Retired), then the Adjutant
General of Florida, and Project Officer Colonel Hugo F. Windham,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Florida National Guard,
are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
LAKE NAME
Alligator
Apopka
Bansna
Crescent
Doctors
Dora
East: Tohopekaliga
Effie
Eloise
George
Gibson
Glenada
Griffin
Haines
Hancock
Horseshoe
Howel1
Istokpoga
Jessie
Jessup
Kissinnnee
Lawne
Lulu
Marion
Minnehaha
Minneola
Monroe
Munson
Okeechobee
Poinsett
Reedy
Seminole
Semino!e
South
Talquin
Tarpon
Thonotosassa
Tohopekaliga
Trout
Weohyakapka
Yale
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY
Columbia
Lake, Orange
Polk
Flagler, Putnam
Clay
Lake
Osceola
Polk
Polk
Putnam, Volusia
Polk
Highlands
Lake
Polk
Pclk
Seminole
Orange, Senrincle
Highlands
Polk
Seminole
Osceola
Orange
Polk
Polk
Orange
Lake
Seminole, Volusia
Leon
Glades, Hendry, Martin,
Okeechobee, Palm Beach
Brevard, Orange, Osceola
Polk
Jackson, FL; Decatur,
Seminole, GA
Pinellas
Brevard
Gadsden, Leon
Pinellas
Hillsborough
Osceola
Lake
Pol k
Lake
-------
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
f ip is 20 25 Km
-------
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
STORE! NO. 1232
I. INTRODUCTION
The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation has recently
published a detailed report on investigations conducted in the Lake
Okeechobee watershed by Department staff and contract investigators
(McCaffrey et al., 1976). The reader is referred to this 600+ page
report for an in-depth evaluation of the lake and its watershed.
II. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Lake Okeechobee is eutrophic. It ranked
thirteenth when the 41 Florida lakes sampled in 1973 were compared
using a combination of six water quality parameters*. Twelve of
the lakes had less and one had the same median total phosphorus,
four had less median orthophosphorus, 23 had less median inorganic
nitrogen, 11 had less mean chlorophyll a_, and 24 had greater mean
Secchi disc transparency.
Survey limnologists noted water hyacinths at some of the sam-
pling stations and abundant emergent and submergent vegetation at
others.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate phosphorus limitation at the
time the sample was collected (03/07/73). Generally, the lake data
See Appendix A.
-------
indicate phosphorus limitation in March and nitrogen limitation in
September and November.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—It is estimated that point sources contributed
2.5% of the total load reaching the lake during the year. It
appears that phosphorus control at the point sources would have
minimal effect on the water quality of the lake because of the
preponderance of the total phosphorus load contributed by other
sources (see discussion below).
2. Non-point sources—The phosphorus loading from non-point
sources is estimated to have been 97.5% of the total load reaching
the lake. The Kissimmee River had the largest load of any of the
sampled tributaries. However, this river basin is impacted
by point sources in its northern reaches (i.e., Shingle Creek),
and effects of the point sources are reflected in high pollutional
loads (Federico and Brezonik, 1975).
The other gaged tributaries - Taylor Creek, Harney Pond Canal,
Unnamed Creek B-l, Indian Prairie Canal, Limbin Creek, and Unnamed
Canal L-l - were estimated to have contributed 11.0%, 7.5%, 5.8%,
2.1%, 1.6%, and 1.0%, respectively. Most of the nutrient loads
in these drainage areas are non-point kinds, including dairy farms
(Taylor Creek) and cattle grazing (Baldwin, 1975). Baldwin (op.
cit.) also indicated that significant amounts of nutrients are con-
tributed by sugar cane and vegetable farming activities south and
-------
southeast of the lake. The importance and effect of these nutrients
on the water quality of Lake Okeechobee is reported by Brezonik
and Federico (1975).
The ungaged drainage areas, including Nubbin Slough and
the North New River and Hillsboro canals, were estimated to
have contributed over 28% of the total phosphorus load reaching
the lake. The Nubbin Slough area apparently has much dairy-
farm activity; and, along with the Kissimmee River, appears to
be the most significant source of phosphorus. The North New
River and Hillsboro canals and the other irrigation canals are
important sources of nutrients when they are back-pumped (Bre-
zonik and Federico, op. cit.).
Because of the low proportion of direct point-source phos-
phorus contributions, effective control of nutrients will involve
the agricultural activities in the Kissimmee-Okeechobee watershed,
including dairy farms, grazing, and vegetable farming (Baldwin,
op. cit.). Also, nutrient loads in the Kissimmee River basin
could be reduced by control of point-source contributions in
the Shingle Creek basin (Federico and Brezonik, op. cit.).
-------
III. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 1,890.71 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 2.8 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 4.7 meters.
4. Volume: 5,293.988 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 3.4 years (based on outflow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Kissimmee River
Harney Pond Canal
Taylor Creek
Indian Prairie Canal
Miami Canal
Limbin Creek
Unnamed Creek B-l
Unnamed Canal L-l
Drainage
area (km2)*
Totals
Outlets -
Caloosahatchee Canal
Okeechobee Waterway (St. Lucie
Canal)
West Palm Beach Canal
Totals 13,007***
Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 122.7 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 149.0 centimeters.
Mean flow
(m3/sec)**
39.68
5.96
2.87
1.52
1.15
1.01
0.73
0.29
53.21
24.75
19.61
4.62
48.98***
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Brezonik and Federico, 1975.
* See page 11.
** For limits of accuracy, See Working Paper No. 175, "... Survey Methods
1973-1976", and Brezonik and Federico, 1975.
*** Includes area of lake; total outflow affected by back pumping (see page 11).
**** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
IV. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Okeechobee was sampled three times during 1973 by means
of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for
physical and chemical parameters were collected from one or more
depths at ten stations on the lake (see map, page v). During each
visit, a single depth-integrated (near bottom to surface) sample
was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification
and enumeration; and during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter
depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also
each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each
of the stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths
sampled were 3.0 meters at station 1, 1.2 meters at station 2,
0.9 meters at station 3, near-surface at station 4, 3.0 meters at
station 5, 1.8 meters at station 6, 1.8 meters at station 7, 1.2
meters at station 8, 1.5 meters at station 9, and 1.8 meters at
station 10.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORThU P (MG/D
N02+N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL ANU
1ST SAMPLING ( 3/ 7/73)
10 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR
STORET CODE 1232
LAKE OK.EECHOBEE
RANGE
22.4 - 27.3
7.7 - 10.3
380. - 800.
8.5 - 8.8
96. - 154.
0.022 - U.07H
0.004 - 0.015
J.030 - 0.190
0.030 - 0.090
1.100 - 2.100
0.060 - 0.240
1.160 - 2.280
3.1 - 16.8
0.4 - 1.8
2ND SAMPLING ( 9/ 1/73)
10 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (ll/ 6/73)
10 SITES
MEAN
25.5
624.
8.7
137.
O.C53
0.006
0.1 15
0.059
1.514
0.174
1.629
1U.3
0.7
MEuI AN
25.8
8.6
640.
8.7
142.
0.0b3
0.00 t
0. 12u
0.060
1.500
0.200
1.5<*U
11.2
0.6
RANGE
27.5 - 29.0
5.2 - 7.8
230.
7.9
25.
0.021
0.007
0.060
0.060
1.600
0.120
1.810
6.1
0.4
- 1147.
8.6
- 298.
- 0.201
- 0.056
- 0.940
- 0.260
- 3.700
- 1.000
- 4.640
- 41.3
1.0
MEAN
28.4
6.8
651.
8.4
136.
0.076
0.025
0.227
0.108
2.360
0.335
2.587
17.4
0.7
MEDIAN
28.4
6.8
638.
8.4
122.
0.068
0.017
0.125
0.095
2.150
0.260
2.270
13.2
0.6
RANGE
24.5 - 26.4
6.8 - 9.6
301.
7.7
53.
0.030
0.008
0.020
0.030
1.100
0.060
1.130
10.4
0.3
- 740.
8.8
- 150.
- 0.096
- 0.041
- 0.250
- 0.070
- 2.000
- 0.310
- 2.140
- 25.2
1.0
MEAN
25.2
7.8
588.
8.4
114.
0.070
0.020
0.095
0.048
1.532
0.144
1.627
15.4
0.7
MEDIAN
24.9
7.9
643.
8.5
124.
0.072
0.019
0.040
0.050
1.500
0.100
1.620
14.3
0.8
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/07/73
09/01/73
11/06/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Lyngbya sp.
Merismopedia sp.
Cryjrtomonas SJD.
Flagellates
Oscillatoria sp.
Other genera
Total
Lyngbya sp.
Fragilaria SJD.
Coscinodiscus sp,
Oscillatoria sp.
Microcystis SJD.
Other genera
Total
Lyngbya sp.
Microcystis sp.
Flagellates
Merismopedia sp.
Pennate diatoms
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
828
453
374
335
217
1.104
3,311
23,
2,
2,
1,
1,
486
888
310
155
155
933
31,927
6,
3,
2,
2,
1,
545
208
695
310
796
6,158
Total
22,712
-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a^
Date Number
03/07/73 1
2 11.2
3 3.1
4 5.3
5 8.5
6 16.8
7 12.0
8 13.6
9 8.7
10 13.2
09/01/73 1 16.2
2 41.3
3 8.1
4 8.1
5 30.5
6 6.9
7 26.3
8 10.2
9 6.1
10. 20.7
11/06/73 1 10.7
2 25.2
3 19.8
4 14.2
5 10.4
6 20.2
7 15.8
8 14.5
9 13.0
10 10.6
-------
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
(a). Stations 1, 2, 3, and 4; March 7 and 8, 1973 -
Spike (mg/1)
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
(b). Stations 5
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
(c). Stations 7
Spike (mq/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
0.007
0.057
0.057
0.007
and 6; March 9
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.012
0.062
0.062
0.012
, 8, 9, and 10;
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.008
0.058
0.058
0.008
0.209
0.209
1.209
1.209
, 1973 -
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.172
0.172
1.172
1.172
March 10, 1973 -
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.172
0.172
1.172
1.172
0.1
6.5
12.3
0.1
Maximum yield
(mg/1 -dry wt. )
0.7
11.5
14.1
1.0
Maximum yield
(mg/1 -dry wt.)
0.2
5.2
15.3
0.2
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Lake Okeechobee was low to moderate at the times the samples
were collected.
There was a significant increase in yield compared to that
-------
10
of the control when only phosphorus was added but a lack of
increase in yield when only nitrogen was added. These results
indicate phosphorus limitation.
The mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios indicate
a temporal and spatial combination of limiting nutrients (see
tabulation below; the indicated limiting nutrients are in
parentheses). Generally, the lake was phosphorus limited
in March (the ratio for site 4 is based on a single surface
sample and may not be representative). The samples taken
during September show a shift to nitrogen limitation, especially
where large inflows were recorded (e.g., stations 8, 9, and 10).
Station March September November
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
23/1 (P)
16/1 (P)
14/1 (P)
11/1 (N)
25/1 (P)
38/1 (P)
19/1 (P)
29/1 (P)
23/1 (P)
28/1 (P)
12/1 (N)
6/1 (N)
50/1 (P)
111/1 (P)
15/1 (P)
5/1 (N)
24/1 (P)
11/1 (N)
15/1 P)
5/1 (N)
16/1 (P)
6/1 (N)
8/1 (N)
10/1 (N)
13/1 (N?)
8/1 (N)
4/1 (N)
5/1 (N)
3/1 (N)
2/1 (N)
-------
11
V. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Florida National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v). Sampling was begun
in March, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for.:the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Florida District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake. The drainage areas of the tribu-
taries listed on page 4, representing the sampling stations indicated
on the map (page v), have been altered by channelization. The deter-
mination of areas is difficult because of the extensive lowlands and
the characteristic low relief. The reader is referred to Joyner
(1974) and Davis and Marshall (1975) for information regarding the
delineation and characteristics of Lake Okeechobee drainage basins.
Surface water drainage from Lake Okeechobee is now controlled by
several canals, of which St. Lucie, Caloosahatchee, and West Palm
Beach are the most important. Other canals serve as both inflow and
outflow channels by means of a closely regulated and complex series
of dams, pumps, and levees (Brezonik and Federico, 1975). Other known
outflow includes seepage along the southern lake boundary which is estimated
to be between 0.62 and 1.42 m3/sec (Meyer, 1971).
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
-------
12
calculated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows.
Nutrient loads for Nubbin Slough and the North New River and Hillsboro
canals are those reported by Davis and Marshall (1975) and are included
in the estimates for the minor tributaries and immediate drainage.
The incoming or outgoing nutrient loads of the Miami Canal (J-l),
West Palm Beach Canal (K-l), and Unnamed Canal L-l were estimated by
using the mean nutrient concentrations and the mean monthly flow. The
estimate shown is a result of the summation of each monthly load where a
negative monthly flow represents flow into the lake and a positive flow
represents flow out of the lake.
The Miami Canal acts as a phosphorus outflow and a nitrogen inflow
because of its characteristic flow patterns and nutrient concentrations
observed during the sampling year.
The operator of the Okeechobee wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. The cities of
Clewiston and Belle Glade did not participate, and nutrient loads were
estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year. The Belle Glade
sewage treatment plant discharges into the Hillsboro Canal which is
back pumped into Lake Okeechobee during approximately one-third of the
year. Nutrient loads shown for Belle Glade are one-third of the total
estimated.
-------
13
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Name
Okeechobee
Clewiston
Belle Glade
Pop.
Served
1,100
1,200
8,000
Treatment
act. sludge
act. sludge
Secondary
Mean Flow
(m'/d)
530.0
454.2**
3,028.0**
Receiving
Water
Taylor Creek
Canal to Lake
Okeechobee
Hillsboro Canal
2. Known industrial - None
* Treatment plant questionnaires.
** Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
14
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Kissimmee River 105,115 30.0
Harney Pond Canal 26,315 7.5
Taylor Creek 38,560 11.0
Indian Prairie Canal 7,190 2.1
Lembin Creek 5,640 1.6
Unnamed Creek B-l 20,235 5.8
Unnamed Canal L-l 3,420 1.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 98,630 28.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Okeechobee 1,895 0.5
Clewiston 1,360 0.4
Belle Glade 9,070 2.6
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 33.085 9.4
Total 350,515 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlets - Miami Canal** 2,800
Caloosahatchee
Canal 31,560
Okeechobee Water-
way (St. Lucie
Canal) 132,960
West Palm Beach
Canal 24,640
Total 191,960
3. Net annual P accumulation - 158,555 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
** See page 12.
-------
15
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Kissimmee River 2,740,455 36.6
Harney Pond Canal 331,740 4.4
Taylor Creek 196,570 2.6
Indian Prairie Canal 103,345 1.4
Miami Canal* 57,640 0.8
Lembin Creek 69,625 0.9
Unnamed Creek B-l 62,040 0.8
Unnamed Canal L-l 75,965 1.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) -
1,776,325 23.7
c. Known municipal STP's -
Okeechobee 3,090 <0.1
Clewiston 4,080 0.1
Belle Glade 27,210 0.4
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 2,041.210 27.3
Total 7,489,295 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlets - Caloosahatchee
Canal 1,839,675
Okeechobee Water-
way (St. Lucie
Canal) 1,331,460
West Palm Beach
Canal 3.782.225
Total 6,953,360
3. Net annual N accumulation - 535,935 kg.
* See page 12.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
16
D. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Tributaries:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1)
Kissimmee River 0.084 2.190
Harney Pond Canal 0.140 1.765
Taylor Creek C-l 0.447 2.206
Indian Prairie Canal 0.150 2.256
Miami Canal 0.056 2.716
Lembin Creek 0.177 2.186
Caloosahatchee Canal 0.062 2.357
Okeechobee Waterway (St. Lucie Canal) 0.215 2.153
West Palm Beach Canal 0.206 2.665
Unnamed Creek B-l 0.788 2.695
Unnamed Canal L-l 0.189 2.798
-------
17
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Note, however, that Florida lakes may assi-
milate phosphorus at a somewhat higher level than that suggested
by Vollenweider (Shannon and Brezonik, 1972).
Essentially, Vollenweider's "dangerous" loading is one
at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain
eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which would result
in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to water bodies
with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.19 0.08 4.0 0.3
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Okeechobee:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.18
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.09
-------
18
VI. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Baldwin, L. B., 1975. Agriculture practices to reduce non-point
pollution in the Okeechobee-Kissimmee basin. FL Dept. of Env.
Reg. Techn. Series, vol. 1, no. 4.
Brezonik, P. L. and A. Federico, 1975. Effects of back pumping
from agricultural drainage canals on water quality in Lake
Okeechobee. FL Dept. of Env. Reg. Techn. Series, vol. 1, no. 1,
Davis, F. E., and M. L. Marshall, 1975. Chemical and biological
investigations of Lake Okeechobee, January, 1973 - June, 1974 -
Interim Report. Central & Southern FL Flood Control Dist.
Techn. Publ. No. 75-1.
Federico, A. and P. L. Brezonik, 1975. A
the Kissimmee - Okeechobee watershed.
Techn. Series, vol. 1, no. 8.
survey of water quality in
FL Dept. of Env. Reg.
Joyner, Boyd F., 1974. Appraisal of chemical and biological conditions
of Lake Okeechobee, Florida, 1969-72. Rept. of Inv. No. 71, U.S.
Geol. Surv., Tallahassee, FL.
McCaffrey, Patrick M., William W. Hinkley, Rotha A. MacGill, and Gor-
don D. Cherr; 1976. Report of investigations in the Kissimmee
River-Lake Okeechobee watershed. FL Dept. of Env. Reg. Techn.
Series, vol. 2, no. 2.
Meyer, F. W., 1971. Seepage beneath Hoover Dike, southern shore of
Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Rept. of Inv. No. 58, FL Dept. Nat.
Resour., Tallahassee.
Shannon, Earl E., and Patrick L. Brezonik, 1972. Relationships be-
tween lake trophic state and nitrogen and phosphorus loading
rates. Env. Sci & Techn. 6.(8): 719-725.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
19
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA fO BE USED IN WALKINGS
LAK'E
COOE LAKE NA»tE
1201 ALLIGATOR LAKE
1202 LAKE APOPKA
1203 LAKE 8ANANA
1206 LAKE CPESCENT
1207 DOCTORS LAKE
1208 LAKE DORA
1209 LAKE EFFIE
1210 LAKE GEORGE
1211 LAKE GItfSON
1212 GLENADA LAKE
121H LAKE GRIFFIN
1215 LAKE HAINES
1217 LAKE HANCOCK
1219 LAKE HORSESHOE
1220 LAKE MOXELL
1221 LAKE ISTOKPOGA
122J LAKE JESSUP
1224 LAKE KISSIMMtt
1227 LAKE LULU
1228 LAKE MAHION
1229 LAKE MINNEHAHA
1230 LAKE "INNEOLA
1231 LAKE MONROE
1232 LAKE OKEECHOdEE
123* LAKE POINSETT
1236 LAKE PFF.OY
1238 LAKE SOUTH
1239 LAKE TALQUIN
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.620
0.10?
0.660
0.065
0.084
0.102
1.480
0.129
0.167
P. 134
0.119
0.063
0.772
0.034
1.260
0.039
0.49?
0.034
1.490
0.044
0.03fl
0.01?
0.139
0.063
0.085
0.033
0.074
O.ObS
MEDIAN
INO^G N
0.260
O.?30
0.260
0.130
0.120
0.240
0.410
0.165
0.115
0.165
U.260
0.115
0.195
0.130
0.285
0.120
0.290
0.145
1.065
0.260
0.080
0.070
0.300
0.185
0.150
0.330
0.130
0.290
500-
MEAN StC
474.000
484.1 76
432.667
473.889
465.555
482.889
489.000
469. 30H
470.000
454.167
481.333
462.667
483.500
459.000
464.000
464.222
487.000
463.667
483.000
468.833
43D.OOO
406.333
474.555
472.366
"69.000
468.500
464.000
462.167
MEAN
C-iLO^A
07.733
40.611
208.600
10.211
27.100
59.978
261.433
35.000
19.675
27.667
66.855
26.567
97.900
12.067
54.117
6.S94
76.550
24.142
276.566
29.967
8.733
3.333
14.225
14.524
6.500
34.837
23.167
9.483
15-
MIU 00
13.100
8.200
3.600
10.200
10.600
7.400
15.000
11.000
10.200
14.700
6.600
10.600
5.600
11.500
9.000
8.600
7.600
8.800
14.300
7.600
7.700
7.400
10.800
9.800
10.600
10.600
9.000
14.400
MEDIAN
0155 J-iT-iO
0.386
0.019
0.293
0.033
0.02B
0.022
C.950
0.063
0.069
0.072
0.038
0.014
0.158
0.023
1.1 7S
0.010
0.288
0.007
1.030
0.016
0.012
0.009
0. 12«
0.010
0.0r>l
0.008
0.028
0.031
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LA^E
COOt
1240
1241
1242
1243
1246
1247
1348
121.9
1250
1252
I25B
1261
1264
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
TROUT
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
LAKE
EAST
N4-4E
THONOTOSASSA
TOHOPEKALIGA
LAKE
WEOHTAKAPK.A
VSLE
MUNSON
SEMINOLE
LA.NE
TARPON
ELOISE
JESSIE
LAKE TQMOPEKALlGA
PAYNE'S PKAIP.IE LAKE (NO
MEOI1N
TOTAL "
0.6V-5
0.24b
1.110
0.0«7
0.027
l.<-75
0.234
?.56C
0.041
0.486
0.051
0.042
1.260
MLOIAN
INORG N
O.O'JB
0.200
0.650
0.080
0.160
0.925
0.175
1.350
0.0/0
0.170
0.090
0.070
0.140
500
MEAN
466.
472.
472.
45t).
441.
486.
473.
444.
400.
465.
452.
440.
476.
SEC
167
917
000
667
000
667
833
667
88<)
333
667
833
000
MEAN
C1LOHA
3/
30
76
7
25
140
102
6<-
6
70
26
5
38
.700
.633
.967
.767
.367
.317
.000
.900
.867
.233
.300
.167
.200
15-
MIN DO
10
10
12
8
7
12
8
10
9
12
10
9
7
.200
.500
.900
.200
.600
.200
.bOO
.«00
.000
.200
.800
.400
.400
ME,) I At;
OISS OrtTrlO P
0.565
0.152
O.Y70
0.011
0.014
0.852
0.026
0.117
O.U27
0.339
0.011
0.007
1.210
-------
HESCENT OF LAKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES xirn HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
1201
1202
1203
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1214
1215
1217
1219
1220
1221
1223
1224
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
123*
123b
1236
1239
LAKE NAME
ALLIGATOR LAKE
LAKE APOPKA
LAKE BANANA
LAKE CRESCENT
DOCTORS LAKE
LAKE DORA
LAKE EFFIE
LAKE GEORGE
LAKE GIBSON
GLENAOA LAKE
LAKE GtMFFIN
LAKE HAINES
LAKE HANCOCK
LAKL HORSESHOE
LAKE HOWELL
LAKE ISTOKPOGA
LAKE JESSUP
LAKE KISS1MMEE
LAKE LULU
LAKE MARION
LAKE MINNE^ArlA
LAKE MINNEOLA
LAKE MONROE
LAKE OKEECHOdEE
LAKE POINSETT
LAKE WEEOr
LAKE SOUTH
LAKE TALOUIN
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
25
50
23
65
60
S3
5
45
40
43
41?
70
18
93
11
85
28
90
3
78
88
100
38
68
58
95
63
5S
( 101
I 20)
( 9)
( 26)
( 24)
( 21)
( 2)
( 18)
( 16)
< 17)
( 19)
( 28)
( 7)
( 37)
( 4)
( 34)
( 11)
( 361
( 1)
( 3D
( 35)
( 40)
( 15)
( 27)
( 23)
( 3S>
( 25)
( 22)
MEDIAN
INOPG M
29
38
29
70
76
35
10
54
si
54
29
81
43
/a
23
76
IK
63
3
29
91
98
15
45
60
13
70
20
( 10)
( 15)
( 10)
I 27)
< 30)
( 14)
( 4)
( 21>
( 32)
( 21)
( 10)
I 32)
< 17)
I 27)
( 9)
( 301
( 7)
< 25)
( 1)
( 10)
( 36)
< 38)
( 6)
( 1H)
( 24)
( 5)
( 27)
( 8)
500-
MEAN SEC
30 (
10 (
20 (
33 (
60 I
18 (
3 (
48 (
45 (
85 (
23 (
75 <
13 (
00 I
6V I
65 (
5 (
73 (
15 (
53 <
95 <
98 (
2a (
40 <
50 (
55 (
69 (
78 (
12)
4)
81
13)
24)
7)
1)
19)
Id)
34)
91
30)
5)
32)
27)
26)
2)
29)
6)
21)
38)
J9I
111
16)
20)
22)
27)
31)
MEAN
CHLO«A
18
38
5
80
55
33
3
43
70
53
30
58
13
78
35
93
25
OS
0
50
as
100
/•i
73
95
4S
68
83
( 7)
( 15)
( 2)
( 32)
( 22)
1 13)
I 1)
( 17)
( 28)
I 21)
I 12)
( 23)
( SI
( 31)
( 14)
( 371
( 10)
( 26)
I 0)
( 20)
( 34)
( 40)
( JO)
( 29)
( 38)
( 16)
( 27)
( 33)
15-
MIN 00
10
74
100
48
34
90
0
23
48
3
95
34
98
20
60
69
83
65
8
83
78
90
26
53
34
34
60
5
( 4)
( 29)
< 40)
( 18)
( 12)
I 35)
I 0)
( 9)
( 18)
1 1)
( 38)
( 12)
( 39)
( 8)
( 23)
( 27)
( 32)
( 26)
( 3)
I 32)
( 31)
( 35)
( 10)
( 21)
< 12)
< 121
( 23)
( 21
MEOIAN
OISS 0*THO V
18
70
23
50
56
68
10
43
40
38
48
78
28
65
3
89
as
99
5
73
80
93
3J
89
45
95
56
53
( 7)
( 28)
I 9)
( 20)
( 22)
( 27)
I 4)
( 17)
( 16)
1 15)
( 19)
( 31)
( 11)
I 26)
( 1)
( 35)
( 10)
( 39)
( 2)
( 29)
( 32)
( 37)
( 131
( 35)
1 18)
( 38)
( 22)
( 211
INuE*
NO
130
280
200
346
341
297
31
256
32<«
276
273
396
213
«06
201
477
!«<•
435
34
366
517
579
215
36*
3*2
33/
386
294
-------
PERCENT OF LIKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBED OK LAKES *IT-I HIGHER VALUESI
LAKE
CODE
1240
12*1
1242
1243
12*6
1247
12*8
1249
1250
1252
1258
1261
126-4
LAKt NAME
LAKE THONOTOSASSA
LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA
TROUT LAKE
LAKE HEOHYAKAPKA
LAKE YALE
LAKE MUNSON
LAKE SEMINOLE
LAKE LAWNE
LAKE TAMPON
LAKE ELOISE
LAKE JESSIE
EAST LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA
PAYNE'S PKAIKIE LAKE (MO
MEDIAN
TOTAL V
20 (
33 C
15 (
75 (
98 (
8 I
35 (
0 I
B3 (
30 I
73 (
80 (
11 (
a)
131
6)
33)
391
3)
14)
0)
331
12)
29)
321
<>>
MEDIAN
INOnG N
85
40
a
91
58
5
48
0
9(3
50
08
98
65
( 34)
( 16)
( 3)
( 36)
( 23)
( 2)
( 19)
( 0)
( 38)
( 20)
( 351
( 38)
( 26)
500-
MEAN SEC
58
38
43
83
90
8
35
0
100
63
Bfa
93
25
( 23)
( 15)
< 17)
( 33)
( 36)
( 3)
( 14)
( 0)
< <>0)
( 25)
( 35)
( 37)
1 10)
MEAN
CHLO-'A
40 (
4a (
23 C
aa (
63 (
a (
10 I
20 1
90 (
2a !
60 <
98 (
li I
161
191
9)
35)
25)
3)
4)
81
36)
ID
24)
391
61
15-
MIN UO
48
40
13
74
83
16
69
43
60
16
26
55
90
( 18)
( 16)
( 51
( 29)
I 32)
( 6)
( 27)
( 17)
( 231
( 6)
< 101
( 221
( 35)
MEOUN
OISS OKTriO P
15 (
30 (
a (
84 (
75 (
13 (
63 (
35 (
60 (
20 <
84 (
99 1
0 1
6)
121
3)
331
30)
5)
25)
14)
24)
8)
33)
39)
0)
INJEX
NO
2(36
229
110
49S
467
sa
260
98
491
207
419
523
^06
-------
LAKES RANGED BY INDEX NOS.
HANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDE* NO
i 1330 LAKE MINNEGLA 579
2 1261 EAST LAKE TOriOPEKALIGA 523
3 1229 LAKE M1NNEHAHA 517
4 12*3 LAKE WEOHYAKAPKA 495
5 1250 LAKE TARPON 491
6 1221 LAKE ISTOKPOGA 477
7 1246 LAKE YALE 467
8 1224 LAKE KISSIMMEE 455
9 1258 LAKE JESSIE 419
10 1219 LAKE HORSESHOE 406
11 1215 LAKE HAINES 396
12 1238 LAKE SOUTH 386
13 1232 LAKE OKEECHOBEE 368
14 1228 LAKE MARION 366
IS 1206 LAKE CRESCENT 346
16 1234 LAKE POINSETT 342
17 1207 DOCTORS LAKE 341
18 1236 LAKE REEDT 337
19 1211 LAKE GIBSON 324
20 1208 LAKE DORA 297
21 1239 LAKE TALOUIN 294
22 1202 LAKE APOPKA 280
23 1212 GLENAOA LAKE 276
24 1214 LAKE GRIFFIN 273
25 12»0 LAKE THONOTOSASSA 266
26 1248 LAKE SEMINOLE 260
27 1210 LAKE GEOftGE 256
28 1241 LAKE TOHOPEKALIGA 229
-------
LA
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR FLORIDA
05/28/76
LAKE CODE 1233
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM)
0.0
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KM)
1232A1
1232B1
1232D1
1232E1
1232F1
1232G1
1232H1
1232J1
1232K1
1232L1
1232M1
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
NOV
DEC
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 0.0
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 0.0
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLO* OUT
0.0
1223.59
NOTE ««» SEE WRITE UP ON LAKE OKEECHOBEE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
1232»«
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
1232A1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
21.946
58.078
67.224
26.873
4.870
4.276
5.097
17.613
64.591
28.034
10.392
36.161
1.841
4.955
2.124
-3.398
-10.562
-1.388
3.79<»
-0.057
5.040
2.945
3.200
4.757
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
26.618
60.881
60.372
41.258
7.221
1.841
6.513
5.975
80.533
12.205
7.872
46.525
1.926
6.145
6.768
6.994
7.079
1.699
6.371
5.833
5.154
4.644
4.559
5.012
MEAN
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.48
0.36B
0.51
31.23
0.59
3.62
19.57
4.191
5.465
-1.557
1.44
9.57
0.311
0.42
37.01
0.57
4.47
14.67
5.380
3.766
-1.926
1.16
23.22
0.623
0.85
52.44
1.27
8.69
27.92
7.419
6.994
-0.113
2.44
30.10
0.085
0.11
37.07
0.17
2.04
48.25
13.592
12.176
-1.331
0.31
5.66
0.368
0.51
21.58
0.42
1.73
18.12
8.014
9.571
-0.481
1.39
19.40
1.557
2.15
33.16
3.06
9.80
32.56
-7.589
-0.623
5.239
6.30
41.23
1.416
1.95
42.08
3.06
8.78
33.47
-6.938
0.538
-0.255
S.t9
38.54
1.444
2.01
45.70
2.97
8.10
37.38
-4.899
3.115
2.265
5.58
4.02
1.133
1.56
53.09
3.20
9.77
8.21
-5.805
1.416
0.793
4.30
17.24
0.850
1.19
74.36
2.35
10.02
20.90
-4.191
2.464
3.228
4.08
22.14
0.396
0.54
26.56
0.37
3.37
21.01
1.841
3.908
-0.765
1.50
15.40
0.170
0.23
21.29
0.14
0.99
14.27
3.115
6.513
-1.699
0.62
19.61
0.729
1.01
39.68
1.52
5.96
24.75
1.150
4.620
0.294
2.87
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR FLORIDA
05/28/76
LAKE CODE 1332
LAKE OKEECH08EE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
123281
1232D1
1232E1
1232F1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
0.198
0.113
0.028
0.085
0.793
3.228
1.076
0.481
0.085
0.028
0.028
0.0
0.255
0.142
0.028
0.142
1.104
4.502
1.472
0.680
0.085
0.057
0.057
0.0
54.680
99.817
60.881
16.509
37.180
75.833
118.563
34.263
4.049
1.926
2.010
23.871
0.0
0.057
0.0
0.283
3.256
0.963
3.766
1.897
0.0
0.057
0.0
0.0
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
0.085
0.113
0.028
0.028
0.453
2.294
0.793
1.048
0.057
0.028
0.028
0.0
0.113
0.142
0.057
0.028
3.200
1.076
1.472
0.085
0.028
0.028
0.0
47.289
176.980
106.188
0.0
18.406
85.234
195.103
7.419
4.616
1.727
0.085
51.253
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.854
3.002
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOtef INFORMATION FOR FLORIDA
05/38/76
LAKE CODE 1232 LAKE OKEECHOBEE
MEAN MONTHLY FLO«S AND OAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
1232G1
1232H1
1232J1
1232K1
FLO« DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
1
?
C.
3
4
5
6
7
g
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
j>
C.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
1.076
0.481
1.671
3.256
13.819
8.835
24.891
15.263
1.444
1.303
0.142
0.0
1.388
4.361
5.578
2.322
0.142
0.142
0.142
0.821
3.087
2.294
1.897
5.295
0.651
8.297
18.689
13.252
-4.786
-1.897
-1.019
1.954
11.893
2.180
2.124
5.975
5.720
14.555
12.148
1.869
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.832
12.403
8.637
1.557
7.900
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
0.0
0.0
0.368
0.0
4.729
0.651
30.582
32.564
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.095
4.672
0.142
0.142
0.142
0.142
0.142
0.142
12.374
4.446
0.142
6.654
2.662
7.249
21.153
24.154
-2.577
0.0
0.0
0.0
12.176
0.0
3.171
5.947
12.828
16.452
11.015
5.862
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.509
0.0
0.0
9.996
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR FLORIDA
05/28/76
LAKE CODE 1232
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
1232L1
1232M1
1232ZZ
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
0.028
-0.708
-0.170
0.283
1.444
9.684
1.586
-0.396
0.0
-0.538
0.0
0.0
1.076
0.481
0.510
5.125
0.0
27.043
16.877
11.185
4.106
0.850
0.765
0.510
28.487
14.696
11.950
21.549
110.124
81.807
79.882
35.453
12.205
7.221
3.710
0.510
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
17
13
17
15
13
21
12
13
16
15
20
15
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.362
0.0
0.0
0.0
-3.256
0.0
0.0
0.736
0.396
0.623
1.274
0.0
43.325
19.510
10.449
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.013
19.086
11.213
1.246
86.055
76.909
79.202
28.940
12.771
0.085
0.934
0.142
FLOW DAY
FLOW
12
0.0
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/35
123201
26 50 10.0 060 49 20.0
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
12099 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/07
73/09/01
73/11/06
TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
13
14
10
10
10
00
00
00
30
15
15
15
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0004
0006
0000
0000
0005
0010
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
24.4
24.3
23.8
28.5
24.8
24.7
24.6
00665
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/07
73/09/01
73/11/06
TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
13
14
10
10
10
00
00
00
30
15
15
15
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0004
0006
0000
0000
0005
0010
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.073
.060
.055
.069
.058
.070
.075
11EPALES 2111202
4 0012 FEET DEPTH
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NHS-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-OIS
SECCHI FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
10
9
9
7
a
7
3221
INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L
.3
.6
.7
.2
.0
.4
7
24 700 8.60 143 0.040
660 8.70 141 0.040
650 8.80 144 0.050
16 710 8.50 136 0.060
14 643 8.40 124 0.050
643 8.20 122 0.050
644 8.10 124 0.050
MG/L
2.100
1.600
1.600
2.300
1.800
1.600
1.400
MG/L
0.180
0.190
0.190
0.100
0.170
0.180
0.180
MG/L P
0.015
0.007
0.009
0.013
0.008
0.012
0.023
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
16
10
.2
.7
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/oa/25
123203
26 57 10.0 081 02 10.0
LAKE OKEECH08EE
12043 FLORIDA
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/08 11 50 0000
11 50 0003
73/09/01 11 05 0000
73/11/06 09 20 0000
09 20 000<»
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/08 11 50 0000
11 50 0003
73/09/01 11 05 0000
73/11/06 09 20 0000
09 ?0 0004
11EPALES 2111202
0010
TER
EMP
ENT
26.2
28.2
2^.5
24.5
0665
S-TOT
/L P
0.051
0.048
0.201
0.076
0.074
00300
DO
MG/L
8.0
6.0
6.8
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
11.2
41.3
25.2
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
35
19
18
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
620
620
380
301
304
4
00400
PH
SU
8.50
8.50
8.00
7.90
7.70
0005
00410 00610
T ALK NH3-N
CAC03 TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
123 0.060
122 0.040
49 0.090
56 0.070
53 0.040
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.800
1.700
2.700
2.000
1.600
00630
N02t>N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.060
0.100
0.030
0.020
00671
PHOS-UIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.008
0.006
0.032
0.014
0.014
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123203
26 47 40.0 080 55 00.0
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
12099 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/08
73/09/01
73/11/06
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/08
73/09/01
73/11/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 30 0000
12 30 0003
11 25 0000
09 40 0000
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 30 0000
12 30 0003
11 25 0000
09 40 0000
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
25.8
27.8
25.3
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.025
0.022
0.021
0.036
11EPALES 2111202
4 0006 FEET DEPTH
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO THANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-DIS
SECCHI FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
8.4
6.4
7.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
3.1
8.1
19.8
72 680 8.70 143 0.040 1.500 0.040 0.006
700 8.80 141 0.030 1.400 0.030 0.004
36 1147 8.40 298 0*140 3.600 0.210 0.007
29 552 8.70 109 0.050 2.000 0.040 0.011
-------
STORE? RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123304
36 43 00.0 080 47 30.0
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
12099 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/08
73/09/01
73/11/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 00 0000
11 45 0000
09 50 0000
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
25.9
27.5
25.3
00300 00077 00094
DO TKANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
9.8
7.4
36
36
33
800
1100
740
11EPALES
4
00400
PH
SU
8.80
8.40
8.60
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
154
296
150
2111202
0005 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.060
0.050
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.700
3.700
1.800
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.940
0.040
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.008
0.009
0.009
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P JG/L
73/03/08 13 00 0000 0.030 5.3
73/09/01 11 45 0000 0.046 8.1
73/11/06 09 50 0000 0.030 14.2
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/35
123205
26 49 30.0 080 43
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
12099 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/09.
73/09/01
73/11/06
TIME
OF
DAY
11
11
11
15
12
12
12
00
do
00
10
20
20
20
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0004
0008
0000
0000
0005
0010
0001C
*ATER
TEMP
CENT
22.6
22.4
28.3
24.9
24.8
24.7
00665
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/09
73/09/01
73/11/06
TIME
OF
DAY
11
11
11
15
12
12
12
00
00
00
10
20
20
20
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0004
0008
0000
0000
0005
0010
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
.042
.040
.040
.041
.096
.094
.095
00300
00
MG/L
8.
8.
7.
9.
7.
32217
11EPALES 2111202
4 0010 FEET DEPTH
00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-DIS
SECCHI FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
INCHES MICROMHO SU
5
3
6
6
6
18 670 8.50
650 8.80
610 8.80
22 709 8.70
12 690 8.40
689 8.40
690 8.20
MG/L MG/L MG/L
144 0.070 1.600
144 0.060 1.200
142 0.070 1.200
136 0.060 1.900
133 0.060 1.900
133 0.060 1.500
132 0.050 1.500
MG/L MG/L
0.160 0.
0.160 0.
0.160 0.
0.060 0.
0.240 0.
0.250 0.
0.230 0.
P
009
009
009
008
019
023
028
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
8.
30.
10.
5
5
4
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123206
26 59 40.0 080 40 30.0
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
FLORIDA
HEP ALES
4
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/09
73/09/04
73/11/06
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/09
73/09/04
73/11/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 45 0000
16 45 0003
11 40 0000
12 40 0000
12 40 0006
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 45 0000
16 45 0003
11 40 0000
12 40 0000
12 40 0006
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
27.0
24.8
28.9
26.2
25.8
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.059
0.053
0.080
O.OB2
0.088
00300
DO
MG/L
9.7
8.9
6.4
8.2
32817
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
16.8
6.9
20.2
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
20 640
630
38 567
18 692
690
00400
PH
SU
8.80
8.80
8.30
8.60
8.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
141
141
113
130
128
2111202
0005 FEET
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.060
0.100
0.050
0.050
DEPTH
00625
TOT
N
KJEL
MG/L
1
1
1
1
1
.800
.200
.600
.600
.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/U
0.160
0.160
0.210
0.100
0.120
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.007
0.005
0.058
0.019
0.022
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123207
27 00 40.0 080 55
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
120^3 FLORIDA
10.0
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/10
73/09/01
73/11/06
0000
0006
12 00
12 00
IS 05 0000
13 35 0000
13 35 0005
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/10 12 00 0000
12 00 0006
73/09/01 15 05 0000
73/11/06 13 35 0000
13 35 0005
11EPALES
0010
TER
EMP
ENT
27.1
27.2
28.9
26.4
26.2
0665
iS-TOT
./L P
0.058
C.066
0.058
O.OS3
0.067
00300
DO
MG/L
7.7
7.4
8.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
. 12.0
26.3
15.8
00077
TKANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
18
24
38
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
570
560
722
455
455
4
00400
PH
SU
8.50
8.70
8.80
8.80
8.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
137
135
131
94
94
211
0010
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.060
0.090
0.040
0.060
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.800
1.400
2.200
1.300
1.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.080
0.100
0.020
0.040
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.011
0.007
0.008
0.014
0.023
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123208
27 00 50.0 060 41 50.0
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
12085 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/09/04
73/11/06
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/09/04
73/11/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 35 0000
12 35 0004
11 25 0000
12 55 0000
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 35 0000
12 35 0004
11 25 0000
I? 55 0000
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
25.0
25.0
28.5
25.6
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.078
0.073
C.093
0.058
00300
DO
MG/L
8.8
6.8
7.8
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
13.6
10.2
14.5
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
20
19
36
640
625
427
653
11EPALES
4
00400
PH
SU
8.70
8.70
8.30
8.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
145
145
77
127
2111202
0007 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.060
0.120
0.040
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.500
1.400
1.800
1.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.140
0.140
0.300
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.009
0.005
0.038
0.013
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/06/25
123209
21 06 40.0 080 50 00.0
LAKE OKEECH08EE
12093 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/09/04
73/11/06
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/09/04
73/11/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 40 0000
15 40 0005
10 50 0000
13 20 0000
13 20 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 40 0000
15 40 0005
10 50 0000
13 20 0000
13 20 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
26.6
26.3
29.0
25.3
25.2
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.050
0.045
0.087
0.069
0.072
11EPALES 2111202
4 0007 FEET DEPTH
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-OIS
SECCHI FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N IM-TOTAL OHTHO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO su MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
e.i
5.2
8.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
8.7
6.1
13.0
35 380 8.70 101 0.070 1.400 0.060 0.008
440 8.70 96 0.090 1.100 0.060 0.004
33 230 7.90 25 0.260 2.100 0.140 0.054
38 544 8.80 109 0.040 1.100 0.030 0.027
543 8.70 110 0.030 1.200 0.030 0.025
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123310
27 08 50.0 080 43 50.0
LAKE OKEECHOBEE
12093 FLORIDA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/09/04
73/11/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 00 0000
16 00 0006
11 10 0000
13 05 0000
13 05 0006
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
27.3
27.1
28.4
24.7
24.8
00300 00077 00094
DO TWANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
8.2
7.8
8.0
17
20
35
640
625
520
618
618
11EPALES
4
00400
PH
SU
8.70
8.70
8.80
8.60
8.50
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
143
142
94
120
125
2111202
0010
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.070
0.100
0.040
0.040
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.400
1.400
1.700
1.300
1.100
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.110
0.110
0.110
0.030
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.007
0.006
0.021
0.027
0.041
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/03/10 16 00 0000 0.069 13.2
16 00 0006 0.066
73/09/04 11 10 0000 0.068 20.7
73/11/06 13 05 0000 0.061 10.6
13 05 0006 0.084
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
1232A1
26 59 00.0 080 37 00.0
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY
12117 MARTIN co HWY MA
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
ST HWY 15 6RDG NEAK PORT MAVACA
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE TIME DEPTH N02<»N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/15
74/01/20
74/02/15
13 15
12 05
13 15
13 30
13 30
14 15
13 55
15 30
13 50
15 30
16 51
13 20
0630
AN03
UTAL
G/L
0.168
0.056
0.540
0.04t>
0.076
0.315
0.370
0.294
1.680
0.232
0.270
0»270
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.800
1.890
1.310
1.300
2.000
1.320
1.600
1.750
1.150
1.300
1,300
4,800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.046
0.069
0.037
0.115
0.039
0.147
0.056
O.lvO
0.032
0.034
0.024
0.140
00671
PHOS-D1S
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.025
0.013
1.000
0.03S
0.058
0.210
0.170
0.210
0.032
0.036
0.025
0.025
00t>65
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.105
0.090
1.100
0.065
0.180
0.260
0.200
0.250
0.055
0.110
0.095
0.070
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/35
1232B1
27 05 30.0 080 3* 30.0
UNNAMED CHEEK
12 MARTIN CO H*Y MA
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
ST HWY 15 b*DG NEAR CHANCY BAY
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/15
74/01/20
74/02/15
11 47
11 45
12 10
12 46
13 20
14 00
13 05
15 15
12 45
13 50
15 33
13 00
0630
!
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/Od/25
1232C1
27 12 30.0 080 47 30.0
TAYLOk CWEEK
12 OKEECHObEE CO HW
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEt
ST HWY 15 8RDG S£ OF OKEECHOBEE
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE TIME DEPTH N024.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/12
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/11/16
74/02/15
11 32
11 35
11 55
12 40
13 15
13 50
13 00
12 30
12 30
0630
:t»N03
OTAL
iG/L
0.078
0.021
0.038
0.210
0.240
0.065
0.250
0.168
0.032
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.760
1.300
1.600
1.400
2.800
1.400
2.200
2.100
4.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.160
0.038
0.150
0.018
0.400
0.160
0.290
0.104
0.155
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.510
0.046
0. 166
0.220
0.500
0.350
0.720
0.264
0.490
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.590
0.095
0.210
0.370
0.590
0.440
0.800
0.315
0.610
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
123201
27 11 30.0 080 50 30.0
LEMBIN CREEK
12 OKEECriOBEE CO HW
T/LAKE OKEECH08EE
ST nwY 78 BROG NEAR EAGUE BAY
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET OEPTH
DATE TIME OEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/15
74/01/20
74/02/15
11 20
11 20
12 OC
12 35
12 20
14 45
12 30
13 10
14 39
12 15
0630
&N03
OTAL
G/L
0.030
0.020
0.024
0.010K
C.022
0.048
0.040
0.048
0.028
0.016
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.200
1.900
1.320
2.800
2.000
4.300
0.950
2.000
1.400
?.700
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.110
0.086
0.080
0.075
0.054
1.000
0.020
0.128
0.036
0.080
00671
PriOS-OIS
ORTriO
MG/L P
0.1)48
0.022
0.023
0.189
0.370
0.160
0.080
0.096
0.192
0.055
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.135
0.075
0.050
0.315
0.440
0.200
0.100
0.100
0.240
0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/03/25
1232E1
27 09 00.0 080 52 00.0
KISSIHME RIVER
12 OKEECH06EE CO Hw
T/LAKE OKEECriOBEE
ST HWY 78 BRDG
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/lb
74/01/20
74/02/15
TIME 1
OF
DAY 1
11 00
12 00
12 30
13 00
13 30
12 15
14 30
12 20
13 00
14 30
12 00
FEET
00630
NI02tkN03
N-TUTAL
MG/L
0.037
0.010N
0.030
0.200
0.086
0.031
0.028
0.078
0.330
0.384
0.040
0.400
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.600
1.380
1.300
1.100
4o200
1.100
1.800
2.000
1.150
1.200
1»300
b.500
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.092
0.044
0.200
0.087
2.400
0.176
U.160
0.350
0.024
0.040
Oo016
0.165
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.032
0.014
0.019
0.105
0.120
0.054
0.050
0.054
0.06b
0.056
0.016
0.045
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.045
0.060
0.045
0.135
0.195
0.090
0.080
0.065
0.095
0.065
0.055
0.075
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL GATE 75/08/35
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/15
74/01/20
74/02/15
10 43
11 47
11 30
11 02
12 45
13 15
14 15
12 15
12 20
13 52
11 30
1232F1
27 03 30.0 080 58 30.0
INDIAN PRAIHIE CANAL
12 GLADES CO HWY MA
T/LAKE OKEECH08EE
ST HWY 78 bHDt>
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
0630
I&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.189
0.160
0.044
0.066
0.035
0.038
0.150
0.168
0.384
0.384
0.104
0.132
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.300
1.150
1.260
1.150
1.400
1.890
3.570
4.bOO
2.200
2.200
0.900
2.4QO
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.132
0.076
0.094
0.120
0.147
0.240
0.420
0.870
0.04<»
0.096
0.024
0.080
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.063
0.085
0.063
0.115
0.189
0.176
0.198
0.094
0.068
0.075
0.036
0.035
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.095
0.105
0.085
0.145
0.290
0.270
0.260
0.155
0.120
0.090
O.lOb
0.075
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/OB/25
123201
27 00 00.0 081 04 00.0
HARNtY POND CANAL
12 GLADES CO HWY MA
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
AT ST HWY 78 BrtDG
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FrtOM
TO
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
74/01/20
74/02/15
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 ?5
10 30
11 00
10 53
13 00
11 35
14 00
12 00
13 41
11 17
00630
N02t.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.170
0.147
0.044
0.022
0.132
0.3«0
0.220
0.160
0.136
0.160
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.460
1.200
1.100
1.700
l.SOO
2.400
3.150
1.050
OoSOO
2.700
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.071
0.100
0.078
0.110
0.16C
O.lb9
0.770
0.054
0.020
0.090
00671
PMOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.066
0.169
0.070
0.040
0.200
0.132
0.230
0.060
0.040
0.035
00665
PMOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.090
0.190
0.090
Oo085
0.260
0.175
0.270
0.105
0.060
0.070
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/35
1232H1
26 49 30.0 081 05 30.0
CALOOSAHATCHEE CANAL
12 GLADES CO MWY MA
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
ST HWY 25 BROG IN MOORE HAVEN
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
74/01/20
74/02/15
10 00
10 00
10 30
10 30
12 00
12 00
11 10
13 30
10 45
13 20
11 00
0630
'&.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.110
0.052
0.050
0.010K
0.024
0.140
0.378
0.154
0.064
0.136
0.104
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.700
1.760
1.700
1.540
1.470
3.300
2.600
1.300
1.000
5.000
U0610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.088
0.105
0.105
0.037
0.105
0.160
0.115
C.420
0.044
0.032
0.170
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.048
0.010
0.012
0.013
0.028
0.130
0.087
0.147
0.040
0.028
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.075
0.030
0.045
0.035
0.090
0.150
0.115
0.175
0.055
0.045
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/2S
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/0
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/OB/25
DATE TIME DEPTH NU2S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/15
74/01/20
74/02/15
13 40
12 25
13 41
14 00
14 30
14 45
14 15
16 00
14 10
15 50
16 48
13 38
1232K1
26 52 00.0 080 38 00.0
H PALM BEACH CANAL
12 PALM dEACH CO H*
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
ST HWY 15 BKDG
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
0630
:S.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.220
0.330
0.092
0.012
0.080
0.231
0.300
0.370
0.250
0.330
0.300
0.270
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.200
2.300
2.400
1.400
2.050
3.200
2.300
6.700
1.050
3.000
1.100
1.500
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.042
0.019
0.042
0.430
0.069
0.310
0.310
G.040
0.136
0.072
0.020
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.031
0.044
0.029
0.013
0.032
0.077
0.075
0.063
0.032
0.03b
0.032
0.020
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.270
0.150
0.170
0.060
0.070
0.280
0.160
0.105
0.065
0.100
0.065
0.075
-------
STCWET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/0&/25
DATE TIME DEPTH N02isN03
FKOM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/17
73/04/13
73/05/17
73/06/15
73/07/13
73/08/21
73/09/12
73/10/13
73/11/16
73/12/15
74/01/20
74/02/15
13 30
12 15
13 40
13 52
14 00
14 30
14 05
15 45
14 00
15 40
1232L1
26 55 00.0 080 37 00.0
UNNAMED CANAL
12 PALM BEACH CO HW
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
ST HWY 15 BRDG 4 MI N OF ri PALM BEACH CA
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
17
13
10
30
0630
isN03
OTAL
6/L
0.430
0.240
0.060
1.740
0.110
0.336
0.147
0.870
0.260
0.300
0.276
0.27fa
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.980
P.400
1.750
2.800
3o300
2.600
3.500
3.450
1.100
2.100
1.200
2.350
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.200
0»048
0.022
0.380
0.5CO
0.500
0.390
0.800
Oo044
0.064
0.020
0.055
00b71
PriOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.039
0.032
0.021
0.168
0.054
0.089
0.046
0.150
0.032
0.036
0.020
0.02S
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.075
0.160
0.120
0.230
0.095
0.115
0.075
0.185
0.060
0.100
0.06b
0.095
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/35
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
73/12/15
74/01/20
13
15
30
08
0.368
0.024
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
4.600
1.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.240
0.016
1232M1
27 17 00.0 080 49 30.0
TAYLOR CREEK
12 OKEECHOBEE CO MP
T/LAKE OKEECHOBEE
CEMETARY RD BRDG N OF TOWN OF OKEECHOBEE
11EPALES 2111204
"E 0000 FEET DEPTH
00671 00665
PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
ORTHO
MG/L P MG/L P
0.540
0.670
0.630
0.900
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/08/25
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/01
CP(T)-
73/05/01
73/06/04
CP(T)-
73/06/04
73/07/02
CP(T>-
73/07/02
73/07/31
CP(T)-
73/07/31
74/03/29
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
00 00
09 00
08 00
16 00
07 00
16 00
07 00
17 00
00630
iM02c.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.345
0.220
0.200
0.210
0.080
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
21.950
14.700
12.600
13.600
16.000
1232CA AS1232CA P001100
27 13 12.0 080 49 20.0
OKEtCHOSEE
12117 OKEECrlOBEE CO MA
T/LK OKEECHOBEE
TAYLOR CREEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH.J-N PHOS-UIS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW-MGO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
12.450 14.000 15.400
6.700
3.990
9.950 11.000
3.900
4.500
0.157
0.148
0.162
0.149
0.165
0.158
4.200 3.760 7.500 0.152 0.160
6.500 9.700 11.500 0.090 0.068
------- |