U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE HARDING
HARRIS COUNTY, GEORGIA
AND
CHAMBERS AND LE COUNTIES, AUWIA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 282
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
WGPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE HARDING
HARRIS COUNTY, GEORGIA
AND
CHAFBERS AND LE COUNTIES, ALAB/W
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 282
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
GEORGIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
819
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Georgia Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Maps y, vt
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices 18
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
i i i
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Georgia Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the Georgia
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey.
J. Leonard Ledbetter, Director of the Environmental Protection
Division; Ralph S. Howard, Jr., Environmental Affairs Coordinator;
Gene B. Welsh, Chief of the Water Protection Branch; Edward T. Hall,
Jr., Unit Coordinator; and Broughton A. Caldwell, R. Marshall Gaddis,
William D. Kennedy, and Kenneth W. Martin, Environmental Specialists,
provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary lake reports, and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Joel B. Paris, III, then the Adjutant General of
Georgia, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel John R. Ranier, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Georgia National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF GEORGIA
LAKE NAME
Allatoona
Blackshear
Blue Ridge
Burton
Chatuge
Clark Hill
Harding
Hartwell
High Falls
Jackson
Nottely
Semi no!e
Sidney Lanier
Sinclair
Walter F. George
COUNTY
Bartow, Cherokee, Cobb
Crisp, Dooly, Lee, Sumpter
Fannin
Rabun
Towns, GA; Clay, NC
Columbia, Elbert, Lincoln,
McDuffie, Wilks, GA;
Abbeville, McCormick, SC
Harris, GA; Chambers, Lee, AL
Franklin, Hart, Stephens, GA;
Anderson, Oconee, Pickens, SC
Butts, Lamar, Monroe
Butts, Jasper, Newton
Union
Decatur, Seminole, GA;
Jackson, FL
Dawson, Forsyth, Gwinnett,
Hall, Lumpkin
Baldwin, Hancock, Putnam
Clay, Quitman, Stewart, GA;
Barbour, Henry, Russell, AL
-------
Ala.* Ga.\
-------
V1
Ala.7 Ga.
V ^
Map Location
Roanoke
LAKE HARDING
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
33-30-—
10 20 30
10 15
Scale
40 Km.
Mi.
-------
LAKE HARDING*
STORE! NO. 1317
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Lake Harding is eutrophic. This lake
ranked last in overall trophic quality when the 14 Georgia lakes
sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six param-
eters**. None of the lakes had higher median total phosphorus,
median dissolved phosphorus, and median inorganic nitrogen; 12
of the lakes had greater mean Secchi disc transparency; and eight
i
had less mean chlorophyll eu Hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen was
depressed to less than 1.0 mg/1 at station 1 in August and at
station 2 in June and August, 1973.
Survey limnologists observed algal blooms in progress at
stations 1 and 3 in August and noted the occurrence of small
beds of rooted aquatic vegetation in the shallows near stations
2 and 4.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Because of signficant losses of phosphorus in both algal
assay samples between the time of collection and the beginning
of the assays, the results are not representative of conditions
in the lake at the time the samples were taken (06/11/73). The
* Table of metric conversions—Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
lake data indicate stations 1, 2, and 3 were phosphorus limited,
and stations 4 and 5 (sampled only once) were nitrogen limited
in June; stations 1, 2, and 4 were phosphorus limited, and
station 3 was nitrogen limited in August; and all stations were
nitrogen limited in October, 1973.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
Attention is called to a significant change in the
Chattahoochee River system following completion of the Survey.
West Point Dam (see map, page v) was nearing completion by
t
the end of the Survey sampling year; and, at the time of
preparation of this Working Paper, at normal pool level the
West Point Impoundment of the Chattahoochee River is a water
body of 93.08 km2 with'a volume of 682.120 x 106 m3 (Hall, 1975);
the calculated mean hydraulic retention time is 48 days. The
construction of this nutrient trap between Lake Harding and the
upstream phosphorus sources (see page 12) undoubtedly has
resulted in a much altered phosphorus loading to Lake Harding.
Therefore, the Lake Harding phosphorus loading data obtained
during the Survey sampling year are now more of historical
interest than of management significance.
For example, if the phosphorus retention of the new reser-
voir is similar to that of Lake Harding during the Survey sampling
-------
year, about 50% of the point and non-point phosphorus load of
the Chattahoochee River above West Point (one-half of 1,318,550
kg/yr) will be retained; and, in effect, this will lower the
overall phosphorus loading to Lake Harding by about 47% and
reduce the loading rate from 58.7 g/m2/yr (see page 16) to 30.9
g/m2/yr. The reduced loading rate will still be about 10 times
the eutrophic rate, but some improvement of the trophic condi-
tion of Lake Harding should occur with a phosphorus reduction
of that magnitude, particularly in view of the short mean
hydraulic retention time of 14 days.
On the other hand, it appears inevitable that West Point
Reservoir will become eutrophic rather quickly. On the basis
of the morphometric data given above and the normalized Chatta-
hoochee River flow, it is calculated that the eutrophic phosphorus
loading rate of the reservoir is 1.4 g/m2/yr. With the total
phosphorus load measured in the Chattahoochee River during the
'Survey sampling year (1,318,550 kg), the reservoir will receive
phosphorus at a rate of about 14.2 g/m2/yr or more than 10 times
the eutrophic rate.
Futhermore, if the proposed diversion to the Chattahoochee
River drainage basin of the Atlanta metro wastes now discharged
-------
to three wastewater treatment plants in the South River drain-
age basin is implemented (Franzmathes, 1974), Survey data indi-
cate that if the diverted wastes are not treated to remove phos-
phorus, the Chattahoochee River total phosphorus load will be
increased to 1,575,725 kg/yr, and the loading rate to West Point
reservoir will be increased from 14.2 g/m2/yr to 16.9 g/m2/yr.
Even if an effluent limit of 1 mg/1 total phosphorus is applied
to the diverted wastes, about 39,000 kg of phosphorus per year
will be added to the load. Since that load is already excessive,
any amount of added phosphorus will be too much.
While the proposed diversion would be expected to benefit
Jackson Lake to some degree*, the merits of the trade-off would
seem to be questionable whether phosphorus removal is provided or
not.
* See Working Paper No. 290, "Report on Jackson Lake".
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 23.67 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 9.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 33.8 meters.
4. Volume: 222.498 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 14 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2) (m3/sec)
Chattahoochee River 9,479.4 165.2
Mountain Oak Creek 178.7 2.5
Halawakee Creek 199.4 2.8
Osanippa Creek 318.6 4.4
Flat Shoal Creek 577.6 8.0
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 204.6 2.9
Totals 10,958.3 185.8
2. Outlet -
Chattahoochee River 10,982.0** 185.8
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 143.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 136.2 centimeters.
t Hall, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Total drainage area adjusted to equal sum of subdrainage areas plus
lake area.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Harding was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from four
stations on the lake (five in June) and from a number of depths at
each station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-
integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface) sample was composited
from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration;
and during the first visit, two 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples
were composited for algal assays (stations 1, 2, and 3 were combined,
and stations 4 and 5 were combined). Also each time, a depth-integrated
sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analy-
sis. The maximum depths sampled were 31.4 meters at station 1, 14.9
meters at station 2, 13.7 meters at station 3, 8.2 meters at station 4,
and 3.4 meters at station 5 (station 5 was omitted after the first samp-
ling due to insufficient depth).
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP 1C)
OISS OXY (MO/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/D
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P
-------
8
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
06/11/73
08/29/73
10/31/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cyclotella
Oscillatoria
Melosira
Cryptomnnas
Nitzschia
Other genera
Total
Raphidiopsis
Anabaenopsis
Merismopedia
Scenedesmus
Oscillatoria
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Scenedesmus
Merismopedia
Chroococcus
Dactyl ococcus
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
168
152
92
76
61
248
797
10,091
445
380
254
233
212
508
Total
2,032
-------
Sampling
Date
06/11/73
08/29/73
10/31/73
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
05
01
02
03
04
01
02
03
04
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Chlorophyll a^
(yg/1)
11.3
6.9
3.8
1.9
1.4
19.4
9.5
15.8
5.2
5.3
4.2
5.5
6.5
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
There was a loss of about 28% of the total phosphorus in
one assay sample and over 50% in the other sample, and the
algal assay results are not representative of conditions in
the lake at the time the samples were taken (06/11/73).
The lake data indicate a somewhat unusual temporal and
spatial combination of limiting nutrients, although it will be
noted that the stations nearest the nutrient point sources
tended toward nitrogen limitation while the stations further
away tended toward phosphorus limitation.
Following is a tabulation of the mean inorganic nitrogen
to orthophosphorus ratios for each of the stations and sampling
-------
10
times with the indicated limiting nutrient in parentheses.
Station 06/11/73 08/29/73 10/31/73
01 18/1 (P) 48/1 (P) 12/1 (N)
02 23/1 (P) 33/1 (P) 13/1 (N?)
03 14/1 (P) 10/1 (N) 9/1 (N)
04 12/1 (N) 14/1 (P) 7/1 (N)
05 12/1 (N)
Nitrogen limitation, as indicated by 1n-lake nitrogen to
phosphorus ratios, does not necessarily suggest that the trophic
condition of the lake can be improved by controlling nitrogen
inputs. The apparent condition of nitrogen-limitation in Lake
Harding resulted from excessive point-source phosphorus inputs
as indicated by the proximity of the N-limited stations to the
point sources. The reversal of the enriched condition, therefore,
depends upon phosphorus control, not nitrogen control.
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Georgia National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the high
runoff months of January and February when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in March, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Georgia District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads for unsam-
pled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were
estimated using the means of the nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at sta-
tions C-l, D-l, and E-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km2.
Nutrient loads for the Langdale, AL, and Pine Mountain, GA, waste-
water treatment plants were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/
capita/year. Loads in the untreated wastes from the communities of
Lanett and Little Shawmut, AL, and West Point, GA, were estimated at
1.587 kg P and 4.263 kg N/capita/year.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
The nutrient loads given for tributaries are those measured minus
the point-source loads within the 40-kilometer limit of the Survey*,
if any.
In addition to the waste sources listed below, recent Georgia Water
Quality Control Board publications (Anonymous, 1972b and 1972c) identify
33 major domestic and 11 major industrial wastewater discharges to the
Chattahoochee River or its tributaries in the 172 or so stream kilometers
from the Atlanta Water Works intake to West Point Impoundment. All of.
these sources are outside the 40-kilometer limit of the Survey, but
their impact on Lake Harding during the Survey sampling year is evident
in the very high phosphorus export rate of the Chattahoochee River at
station A-2 (see page 16).
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
A. Waste Sources :
1. Known muncipal -
Pop.
Served
7,298
Name
Langdale,
AL**
Lanett, AL
Little
Shawmut, AL
Pine Mountain,
GA
West Point,
GA
2. Known industrial -
Treatment
aer. pond
Name
Type Waste
Mean Flow
(mVd)*
2,762.3
6,908
2,682
862
4,232
none
none
Imhoff
none
2,614.7
1,015.1
326.3
1 ,601 .8
Design, Flow
Treatment (m3/d)
domestic stab, pond
Deering-
Mi 11i ken
Service
Corp., Pine
Mtn. (tex-
tile) Mill
Coca-Cola domestic &
Bottling soft
Co., West drink
Point wastes
South High- wash water none
land Washer-
ette, LaGrange
West Point textile none
Mfg. Co.,
Lanett
39.7
aer. pond & 124.9
stab, ponds
unknown
unknown
Receiving
Water
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Chattahoochee River
Turkey Creek to
Flat Shoal Creek
Chattahoochee River
Receiving
Water
Polecat Creek to
Flat Shoal Creek
Long Cane Creek
Long Cane Creek
Chattahoochee River
t Chitwood, 1974; Anonymous, 1971b & 1971c.
* Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
** Plant serves Langdale, Riverview, Shawmut, and Fairfax, Alabama,
plus two textile mills.
-------
14
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Chattahoochee River 1,318,550 94.8
Mountain Oak Creek 3,440 0.2
Halawakee Creek 3,660 0.3
Osanippa Creek 22,100 1.6
Flat Shoal Creek 7,230 0.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 3,480 0.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Langdale 8,275 0.6
Lanett 10,965 0.8
Little Shawmut 4,255 0.3
Pine Mountain 980 0.1
West Point 6,715 0.5
d. Septic tanks* - 325 <0.1
e. Industrial - Unknown ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 415 <0.1
Total 1,390,390 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Chattahoochee River 648,575
3. Net annual P accumulation - 741,815 kg.
* Estimate based on 1,142 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Chattahoochee River 6,324,785 90.1
Mountain Oak Creek 52,840 0.8
Halawakee Creek 80,250 1.1
Osanippa Creek 184,660 2.6
Flat Shoal Creek 185,740 2.6
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 69,975 1.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Langdale 24,820 0.4
Lanett 29,450 0.4
Little Shawmut 11,435 0.1
Pine Mountain 2,930 <0.1
West Point 18,040 0.3
d. Septic tanks* - 12,170 0.1
e. Industrial - Unknown ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 25,555 0.4
Total 7,022,650 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Chattahoochee
River 6,026,685
3. Net annual N accumulation - 995,965 kg.
* Estimate based on 1,142 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
16
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Chattahoochee River 139 667
Mountain Oak Creek 19 296
Halawakee Creek 18 402
Osanippa Creek 69 580
Flat Shoal Creek 13 322
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 58.74 31.34 296.7 42.1
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake Harding:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 3.00
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 1.50
-------
17
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971a. Chattahoochee River basin study. GA Water
Qual. Contr. Bd., Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1971b. Inventory of water pollution control facilities.
GA Water Qual. Contr. Bd., Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1972a. Georgia municipal and industrial wastewater
treatment facilities associated with reservoirs. GA Dept. of
Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1972b. Water quality data - Atlanta area. Chattahoochee
Flint, and South rivers, 1970 and 1971. GA Water Qual. Contr.
Bd., Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1972c. Water quality data - Columbus area. Chattahoochee,
River, 1970-1971. GA Water Qual. Contr. Bd., Atlanta.
Anonymous, 1974. Water quality monitoring data for Georgia streams,
1973; volume 3. GA Dept. of Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Chitwood, John C., 1974. Treatment plant questionnaire. AL water
Impr. Comm., Montgomery.
Franzmathes, Joseph R., 1974. Personal communication (proposed Atlanta
metro waste diversion). Water Divn., Region IV. Atlanta.
Hall, Edward T., Jr., 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
GA Dept. of Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
, 1975. Personal communication (West Point
Reservoir morphometry). GA Dept. of Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the
phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Natl.
Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland
Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10"4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 1316 BLUE RIDGE LAKE 524
2 1318 BURTON LAKE 523
3 1303 CHATUGE LAKE 424
4 1311 NOTTELY RESERVOIR 393
5 1310 LAKE SIDNEY LANIER 385
6 1304 CLARK HILL RESERVOIR 309
7 1301 ALLATOONA RESERVOIR 286
8 1302 BLACKSHEAR LAKE 284
9 1313 SINCLAIR LAKE 254C
10 1312 LAKE SEMINOLE 253
11 1319 HIGH FALLS LAKE 192
12 1314 LAKE EUFAULA 184
13 1309 JACKSON LAKE 116
14 1317 LAKE HARDING 77
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WlT.i HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
1301 ALLATOONA RESERVOIR
1302 BLACKSHEAR LAKE
1303 CHATUGE LAKE
1304 CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
1309 JACKSON LAKE
1310 LAKE SIDNEY LANIER
1311 NOTTELY RESERVOIR
1312 LAKE SEMINOLE
1313 SINCLAIR LAKE
i3i<» LAKE EUFAUL'A
1316 BLUE RIDGE LAKE
1317 LAKE HARDING
1318 BURTON LAKE
1319 HIGH FALLS LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
62 (
38 (
85 (
54 <
8 (
69 (
77 (
31 (
46 (
15 (
92 (
0 (
100 (
23 (
8)
5)
11)
7)
1)
9)
10)
4)
6)
2)
1?)
0)
13)
3)
MEDIAN
INORG N
54 (
31 (
85 (
62 (
8 (
46 <
69 (
15 (
38 (
23 (
92 (
0 (
100 (
77 (
7)
4)
11)
8)
1)
6)
9)
2)
5)
3)
12)
0)
13)
10)
500-
MEAN SEC
46 (
0 (
92 (
62 (
15 (
• 77 (
69 (
38 (
54 (
31 (
85 (
8 (
100 (
23 (
6)
0)
12)
8)
2)
10)
9)
5)
7)
4)
11)
1)
13)
3)
MEAN
CHLORA
31 I
100 <
69 1
54 (
8 (
77 (
62 (
46 1
23 1
15 1
85 1
38 1
92 1
0 1
; 4)
13)
; 9)
; 7)
; i>
: 10)
: e>
! 6>
: 3)
I 2)
; ID
I 5)
1 12)
; o)
15-
MIN DO
31 (
100 (
31 (
31 (
69 (
31 (
31 <
92 (
31 (
77 (
85 (
31 (
31 (
31 (
0)
13)
0)
0)
9)
0)
0)
12)
0)
10)
11)
0)
0)
0)
MEDIAN
DISS P
62 (
15 (
62 (
46 (
8 (
85 (
85 (
31 (
62 (
23 (
85 (
0 (
100 (
38 (
7)
2)
7)
6)
1)
10)
10)
4)
7)
3)
10)
0)
13)
5)
INDEX
NO
286
284
424
309
116
385
393
253
254
184
524
77
523
192
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
1301 'ALLATOONA RESERVOIR
1302 BLACKSHEAR LAKE
1303 CHATUGE LAKE
1304 CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
1309 JACKSON LAKE
1310 LAKE SIDNEY LANIER
1311 NOTTELY RESERVOIR
1313 LAKE SEMINOLE
1313 SINCLAIR LAKE
1314 LAKE EUFAULA
1316 BLUE RIDGE LAKE
1317 LAKE HARDING
1318 BURTON LAKE
1319' HIGH FALLS LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.020
0.035
0.014
0.024
0.094
0.016
0.015
0.040
0.026
0.048
0.010
0.114
0.007
0.047
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.150
0.250
0.110
0.150
0.530
0.180
0.130
0.405
0.230
0.345
0.105
0.640
0.100
0.115
500-
MEAN SEC
443.167
468.091
382.778
439.250
461.385
396.417
405.667
456.133
440.667
457.667
394.889
467.538
363.889
459.444
MEAN
CHLORA
7.489
1.855
6.339
6.715
14.577
5.431
6.656
6.760
8.006
9.083
3.078
7.438
2.733
15.075
15-
MIN DO
14.900
11.700
14.900
14.900
14.800
14.900
14.900
11.800
14.900
14.400
13.000
14.900
14.900
14.900
MEDIAN
DISS P
0.005
0.014
0.005
0.007
0.027
0.004
0.004
0.010
0.005
0.011
0.004
0.045
0.003
0.009
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA
LAKE CODE 1317 HARDING LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 10981.6
01/06/76
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KM)
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN ,JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
1317A1
1317A2
1317C1
1317D1
1317E1
1317F1
1317ZZ
10981.6
9479.4
178.7
199. 4
318.6
577.6
204.6
214.78
182.79
3.09
3.45
5.80
10.53
3.54
276.63
227.78
4.33
4.84
8.58
15.55
4.96
314.85
266.04
4.93
5.52
9.32
16.79
5.66
296.87
249.53
4.56
5.10
7.59
13.76
5.21
201.28
180.89
2.55
2.83
3.91
7.08
2.92
143.37
137.53
1.50
1.67
2.58
4.64
1.73
132.98
131.16
2.12
2.38
2.55
4.62
2.44
133.26
126.01
1.27
1.44
1.98
3.57
1.47
108.23
105.48
0.99
1.10
1.53
2.78
1.13
116.95
103.38
1.10
1.25
1.81
3.31
1.27
130.99
125.33
1.73
1.93
2.52
4.56
1.98
165.57
150.50
2.44
2.72
4.98
9.06
2.78
185.75
165.15
2.54
2.84
4.40
7.98
2.91
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE «
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
10981.6
10958.3
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
NOTE •«• LAKE AREA=9 SO Mlt NOT INCLUDED IN SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY
1317A1
FLOW
1317A2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
339.80
487.05
317.15
291.66
175.28
136.20
108.17
111.29
128.84
160.27
413.43
410.59
318.00
429.57
330.46
299.31
178.11
137.05
119.78
115.53
133.09
152.63
370.95
356.79
10
14
5
2
15
11
15
13
10
8
9
6
10
10
16
6
11
8
12
11
10
18
14
16
204.16
336.97
276.94
334.14
167.92
118.08
144.13
24.55
99.39
172.17
334.14 23
215.21 20
167.64
1008.08
169.62
220.31
126.58
94.01
79.85
71.64
143.85
136.77
252.02 23
605.98 28
334.14
351.13
359.62
242. 11
2235.75
2235.76
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA
01/06/76
LAKE CODE 1317
HARDING LAKE
MEAN MONTHLr FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
1317C1
131701
1317E1
1317F1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
Z
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
MEAN FLOW DAY
6.54
8.47
2.66
1.47
1.27
1.22
0.85
0.96
1.16
2.15
5.21
5.89
7.33
9.49
2.94
.64
.42
.36
.93
.08
.30
2.41
5.83
6.60
12.40
14.10
4.08
2.52
1.53
1.87
1.30
1.27
1.64
3.40
9.63
11.04
22.34
25.60
7.36
4.56
2.78
3.40
2.35
2.61
3.31
6.31
16.99
19.26
10
14
16
2
15
11
IS
13
10
8
9
6
10
10
16
6
11
8
12
11
15
18
1
16
10
10
16
6
11
8
12
11
15
18
9
16
IS
5
2
15
11
15
13
10
8
9
6
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
2.86
4.67
1.67
2.01
2.69
1.13
1.13
0.85
1.22
1.95
3.14
3.40
3.17
9.17
1.87
.42
.19
.98
.16
.99
.05
.36
13.96
7.76
4.67
16.99
2.52
2.24
4.39
2.58
1.10
1.10
1.25
1.67
5.38
13.88
13.31
8.78
5.95
8.21
3.11
3.09
2.27
3.34
5.66
9.63
10.62
23
20
28
23
28
23
20
4.45
6.23
3.79
8.07
5.80
14.16
20.95
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA
01/06/76
LAKE CODE 1317
HARDING LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY
13172Z
MONTH YEAR
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7«
74
MEAN FLOW DAY
7.53
9*68
3.03
1.70
1.47
1.39
0.96
1.36
1.61
2.80
6.23
7.02
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
131701
3? 39 52.0 085 05 29.0
LAKE HARDING
13145 GEORGIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/08/29
73/10/31
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
0000
0006
0015
0030
0050
0070
0090
0103
0000
0005
0015
0030
0050
0058
0075
0092
0100
0000
0010
0020
0040
0060
0075
0096
CENT
?5.5
24.6
22.9
22.1
21.4
21.1
20.8
20.5
29.1
?8.7
26.9
26.4
26,2
26.1
25.9
24.5
21.1
19.2
19.3
19.3
18.6
17.9
17.6
17.4
11EPALES
00300
DO
MG/L
8.6
7.4
6.6
5.8
5.1
3.8
2.3
13.0
4.8
4.2
4.1
1.8
0.1
8.0
6.6
7.4
8.0
7.9
6.0
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
30 50
52
56
56
52
54
56
59
48 81
79
69
68
67
67
69
84
212
48 63
63
63
59
55
55
55
3
00400
PH
SU
8.00
7.10
6.30
6.20
6.10
6.00
5.80
5.50
9.80
7.10
6.80
6.70
6.60
6.80
6.90
6.90
6.90
6.90
6.90
6.80
6.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
16
16
17
14
13
13
16
16
23
23
17
17
16
85
16
16
14
16
14
12
11
2111202
0107
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.100
0.110
0.130
0.170
0.220
0.300
0.360
0.070
0.160
0.190
0.200
0.340
6.060
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.110
0.140
0.140
0.150
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.400
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.600
0.600
1.100
0.500
0.400
0.500
0.700
7.700
0.500
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.400
00630
N02J.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.130
0.300
0.450
0.420
0.410
0.420
0.400
0.350
0.090
0.490
0.590
0.600
0.610
0.100
0.690
0.670
0.670
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.590
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.019
0.022
0.042
0.03B
0.037
0.032
0.030
0*027
0.014
0.061
0.063
0.040
0.012
0.008
0.066
0.069
0.070
0.076
0.084
0.081
0.081
-------
STO^Ef
OATK 74/11/26
DATE
TO
73/06/11
7 3/ OB/ 29
73/10/31
TIMF DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
20
?0
20
20
?0
20
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
0000
0006
0015
0030
0050
0070
0090
0103
0000
0015
0030
0050
0075
0100
0000
0010
0020
0040
0060
0075
0096
•'J665
S-TOT
/L *
0.093
O.OH4
0 . 1 26
0.115
0.105
0.11S
0.124
0.169
0.065
0.0^4
0.09>5
0.111
0.085
0.093
0.111
0.112
0.115
U.13?
0.160
0.172
0.187
32217
CHLRPHYL
4
UG/L
11.3
19.4
5.3
131701
32 39 52.0 085 05 29.0
LAKE HAPDING
13145 GEORGIA
1 IE'-3 ALES
3
2111202
0107 FEET
DEPTH
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
131702
32 41 25.0 085 08 42.0
LAKE HARDING
13 GEORGIA
OATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/08/29
73/10/31
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/08/29
73/10/31
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 30 0000
12 30 0006
12 30 0015
12 30 0025
12 30 0036
12 30 0049
11 15 0000
11 15 0015
11 15 0018
11 15 0025
11 15 0040
11 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0015
11 00 0035
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 30 0000
12 30 0006
12 30 0015
12 30 0025
12 30 0036
12 30 0049
11 15 0000
11 15 0015
11 15 0025
11 15 0040
11 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0015
11 00 0035
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
27.4
25.2
22.4
21.8
20.9
19.5
29.3
26.8
26.6
26.3
25.8
19.0
19.1
19.0
18.7
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.052
0.063
0.113
0.099
0.066
0.073
0.041
0.037
0.056
0.068
0.095
0.039
0.106
0.134
00300
DO
MG/L
9.6
7.0
5.5
3.2
0.6
10.0
1.0
1.3
0.2
5.8
6.2
7.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
6.9
9.5
4.2
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
48 47
50
58
52
48
69
50 67
64
65
64
73
36 61
63
61
57
11EPALES
3
00400 00410
PH
SU
8.60
8.20
6.30
6.20
5.90
5.90
9.10
6.80
6.70
6.70
6.90
6.80
6.80
6.80
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
16
18
18
17
16
23
19
18
17
26
12
15
16
17
3111202
0053 FEET DEPTH
00610 00625 00630
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.100
.100
.140
.160
.190
.500
.130
.220
.280
.660
.140
.140
.140
.140
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.700
1.100
0.600
0.600
1.200
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.110
0.430
0.390
0.300
0.150
0.100
0.260
0.480
0.080
0.560
0.560
0.560
0.580
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.008
0.012
0.038
0.035
0.018
0.003
0.008
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.051
0.050
0.053
0.071
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
131703
32 41 22.0 085 06 57.0
LAKE HARDING
13 GEORGIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/08/29
73/10/31
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/Otl/29
73/10/31
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 40 0000
14 40 0006
14 40 0015
14 40 0027
14 40 0040
12 55 0000
12 55 0005
12 55 0015
12 55 0025
12 55 0029
11 25 0000
11 25 0010
11 25 0025
11 25 0045
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 40 0000
14 40 0006
14 40 0015
14 40 0027
14 40 0040
1? 55 0000
12 55 0005
1? S5 0015
1? 55 0029
11 ?5 0000
11 ?5 0010
11 25 0025
11 25 0045
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
26.7
23.3
21.8
21.4
21.2
29.1
?7.a
26.9
26.6
26.5
19.0
18.9
18.4
16.6
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.107
0.121
0.120
0.143
0.101
0.097
0.115
0.100
0.140
0.121
0.115
0.1?5
0.203
00300
DO
HG/L
7.8
7.5
7.8
7.8
12.3
10.2
6.?
5.0
7.0
7.4
8.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
3.8
IS. 8
5.5
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
12 55
54
56
54
57
36 73
70
68
68
69
38 62
61
59
52
11EPALES
3
00400 00410
PH
SU
6.60
6.40
6.70
5.60
5.60
9.40
9.00
7.10
6.80
6.90
6.80
6.80
6. dO
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
20
19
20
19
18
19
18
18
19
19
19
20
19
2111202
0044 FEET DEPTH
00610 00625 00630
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.100
0.120
0.110
0.120
0.100
0.050
0.160
0.170
0.110
0.100
0.100
0.130
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.300
1.100
0.700
0.600
0.700
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.300
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.390
0.440
0.440
0.440
0.4SO
0.160
0.260
0.490
0.520
0.630
0.610
0.590
0.610
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.033
0.040
0.041
0.042
0.041
0.028
0.051
0.058
0.062
0.071
0.067
0.074
0.100
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
1.31704
32 43 08.0 085 07 18.0
LAKE HARDING
13 GEORGIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/08/29
73/10/31
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
73/08/29
73/10/31
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 40 0000
15 40 0006
15 40 0015
15 40 0027
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0010
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 40 0000
15 40 0006
15 40 0015
15 40 0027
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
1? 00 0010
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
20.8
20.6
20.6
20.3
27.3
27.0
16.1
15.6
15.8
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.136
0.125
0.134
0.128
0.192
0.168
0.189
0.187
0.114
00300
DO
MG/L
8.5
8.6
S.5
6.8
6.6
8.2
8.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
1.9
5.2
6.5
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
8
24
36
47
46
46
45
68
69
63
50
58
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
6.50
6.50
6.30
5.90
6.80
8.60
7.00
7.00
6.80
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
11
11
10
19
16
21
27
22
20
2111202
0031
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.110
0.090
0.100
0.120
0.120
0.100
0.090
0.020
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.300
0.200
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.440
0.450
0.440
0.460
0.650
0.650
0.530
0.550
0.550
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.047
0.046
0.046
0.045
0.019
0.091
0.106
0.116
0.061
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/36
131705
32 45 37.0 085 08 35.0
LAKE HARDING
13145 GEORGIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 15 0000
16 15 0006
16 15 0011
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
20.0
20.0
20.0
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES M1CROMHO
8.6
8.7
8
46
47
46
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
6.60
6.60
6.50
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
17
16
16
2111203
0015 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.070
0.090
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.200
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.470
0.460
0.480
006T1
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.050
0.049
0.045
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/06/11 16 15 0000 0.126 1.4
16 15 0006 0.112
16 15 0011 0.167
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/01/06
1317A1 01X1A1
32 39 30.0 085 05 30.0
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
13 7.5 BARTLETTS FE
0/HARDING LAKE
POWER PLANT SUBSTA BELO DAM ALABAMA SIUE
HEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/14
73/05/05
73/06/02
73/07/15
73/08/11
73/09/15
73/10/13
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/09
74/01/23
74/02/06
74/02/20
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH NO?^N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
14
11
14
10
10
09
10
09
09
19
19
21
19
50
18
15
50
06
00
50
00
30
15
18
00
00
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.410
.310
.378
.290
.410
.410
.378
.530
.560
.510
.410
.320
.310
.320
MG/L
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
150
480
820
370
540
780
630
575
050
400
400
300
400
0.400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
0.
720
147
066
080
115
200
130
086
071
128
060
030
135
055
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
048
044
042
052
056
058
075
071
060
080
050
065
045
040
MG/L P
0.105
0.102
0.115
0.115
0.100
0.130
0.125
0.120
0.060
0.145
0.125
0.130
0*100
0.115
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/01/06
1317A2 01X1A2
32 47 30.0 085 08 30.0
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER
13 7.5 S LANNET
I/HAKOING LAKE
E BANK OF ISLAND E OF RIVER VIEW
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
.FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/10
73/05/16
73/06/06
73/07/11
73/08/08
73/09/12
73/10/11
73/11/10
73/12/18
74/01/14
74/01/23
74/02/28
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF. N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
15
10
15
13
14
15
14
11
10
18
19
18
13
30
00
00
50
15
25
00
20
20
30
20
30
20
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.350
.280
.490
.570
.510
.530
.600
.660
.690
.450
.470
.140
.730
MG/L
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
050
300
000
890
310
480
500
300
925
600
300
900
700
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
231
072
050
620
042
030
044
042
350
144
042
075
065
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
066
050
065
058
073
110
176
160
218
112
065
015
940
MG/L P
0.150
0.200
0.190
0.185
0.163
0.270
0.220
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.260
0.050
1.000
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/01/06
1317C1 1317C1
32 43 30.0 085 05 30.0
MOUNTAIN OAK CREEK
13 7.5 8ARTLETTS FE
T/HARDING LAKE
BRDG ON LICK SKILLET RD
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/14
73/05/16
73/06/02
73/07/15
73/08/11
73/09/15
73/10/13
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/09
74/01/23
74/02/06
74/02/20
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
14
13
13
11
11
11
11
11
10
19
20
22
21
00
40
25
27
40
30
30
24
00
30
35
00
00
00
M&/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.147
.189
.198
.220
.035
.189
.126
.033
.160
.176
.140
.132
.176
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
580
320
180
660
360
540
350
650
500
200
100K
700
100K
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.027
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
005K
044
032
044
010
058
050
054
024
030
015
135
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
Oil
005K
010
008
024
008
0.017
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
013
012
015
010
010
007
MG/L P
0.025
0.045
0.030
0.020
0.110
0.050
0.060
0.040
0.025
0.031
0.050
0.025
0.230
0.025
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO fl£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/01/06
1317D1 01X101
34 41 00.0 065 12 30.0
HALAWAKEE CREEK
13 7.5 BEULAH
1/HAHUING LAKE
COVEWED 8ROG .8 MI S* TILLERY XRD SEC KD
HEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/10
73/05/16
73/06/06
73/07/11
73/08/08
73/09/12
73/11/15
73/12/18
74/02/28
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 30
11 00
15 10
14 ?5
14 SO
15 55
14 50
11 05
17 20
14 30
00630
N020N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.097
0.150
0.160
0.210
0.147
0.190
0*140
0.027
0.232
0.048
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.540
0.930
0.910
2.600
0.460
0.340
0.440
0.250
0.200
0.400
03610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.250
0.088
0.025
0.940
0.134
0.016
0.032
0.019
0.026
0.010
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.018
0.012
0.017
0.011
0.024
0.013
0.024
0.012
0.030
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.020
0.045
0.025
0.035
0.030
0.085
0.055
0.045
0.020
0.030
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/01/06
1317E1 01X1E1
32 44 00.0 085 09 00.0
OSANIPPA CREEK
13 7.5 BEULAH
T/HARDING LAKE
H*Y BRDG 2 MI N OF MCCULLOH
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/10
73/05/16
73/06/06
73/07/11
73/08/08
73/09/12
73/10/11
73/11/15
73/12/18
74/01/09
74/01/23
74/02/28
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
16
10
15
14
14
15
14
11
10
18
19
20
14
10
30
45
10
35
45
30
50
40
50
45
55
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
.058
.086
.038
.018
.023
.013
.020
.011
.014
.820
.132
.072
.120
MG/L
1.380
0.300
0.810
0.840
1.300
1.100
2.600
1.600
1.250
0.200
0.300
1.000
1.000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
066
024
034
019
023
008
019
032
012
020
017
055
050
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
P
021
018
Oil
016
080
110
330
147
168
005K
035
015
035
MG/L P
0.070
0.055
0.055
0.080
0.210
0.220
0.540
0.280
0.260
0.010
0.085
0.030
0.057
DEPTH
K VALUt KNOWN TO bE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/01/06
1317F1
32 50 15.0 065 07 15.0
FLAT SHOAL CREEK
13 7.5 WHITEVILLE
T/SEMINOLE LAKE
GA HMY 103 BROG
11EPALES 21
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/06/02
73/07/15
73/08/11
73/09/15
73/10/13
73/11/10
73/12/08
7W01/09
74/01/23
74/02/06
74/02/20
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
12
13
11
11
13
10
10
10
20
21
22
20
05
5?
50
00
10
00
55
30
00
30
15
55
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.200
.230
.260
.189
.260
.210
.176
.060
.160
.276
.184
.200
.224
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
930
660
050
100
260
360
150
350
200
200
300
500
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
231
015
420
037
007
019
023
039
036
025
025
065
0.020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
007
020
006
027
013
007
015
009
008
015
015
010
010
MG/L P
0.025
0.020
0.015
0.040
0.040
0.025
0.015
0.045
0.025
0.035
0.035
0.160
0.045
------- |