U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
HIGH FALLS POND
BUTTS, LAIW, AND MONROE COUNTIES
GEORGIA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 289
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
i? GPO 697-O32
-------
REPORT
ON
HIGH FALLS POND
BUTTS, LAIW AND MONROE COUNTIES
GEORGIA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 289
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
GEORGIA NATIONAL GUARD
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Georgia Study Lakes. iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 6
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 7
IV. Nutrient Loadings 13
V. Literature Reviewed 18
VI. Appendices 19
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Georgia Department of
Natural Resources for professional involvement and to the Georgia
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey.
J. Leonard Ledbetter, Director of the Environmental Protection
Division; Ralph S. Howard, Jr., Environmental Affairs Coordinator;
Gene B. Welsh, Chief of the Water Protection Branch; Edward T. Hall,
Jr., Unit Coordinator; and Broughton A. Caldwell, R. Marshall Gaddis,
William D. Kennedy, and Kenneth W. Martin, Environmental Specialists,
provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary lake reports, and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Joel B. Paris, III, then the Adjutant General of
Georgia, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel John R. Ranier, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Georgia National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF GEORGIA
LAKE NAME
Allatoona
Blackshear
Blue Ridge
Burton
Chatuge
Clark Hill
Harding
Hartwell
High Falls
Jackson
Nottely
Semi no!e
Sidney Lanier
Sinclair
Walter F. George
COUNTY
Bartow, Cherokee, Cobb
Crisp, Dooly, Lee, Sumpter
Fannin
Rabun
Towns, GA; Clay, NC
Columbia, Elbert, Lincoln,
McDuffie, Wilks, GA;
Abbeville, McCormick, SC
Harris, GA; Chambers, Lee, AL
Franklin, Hart, Stephens, GA;
Anderson, Oconee, Pickens, SC
Butts, Lamar, Monroe
Butts, Jasper, Newton
Union
Decatur, Seminole, GA;
Jackson, FL
Dawson, Forsyth, Gwinnett,
Hall, Lumpkin
Baldwin, Hancock, Putnam
Clay, Quitman, Stewart, GA;
Barbour, Henry, Russell, AL
-------
HIGH FALLS POND
® TRIBUTARY SAMPLING SITE
x LAKE SAMPLING SITE
-> SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY
O DIRECT DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY
rchard Hill
-------
HIGH FALLS POND*
STORE! NO. 1319
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that High Falls Pond is eutrophic. This
lake ranked eleventh in overall trophic quality when the 14 Georgia
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six
parameters**. Ten lakes had less median total phosphorus, eight
had less median dissolved phosphorus, three had less inorganic
nitrogen, 13 had less mean chlorophyll a^ and ten had greater Secchi
disc transparency. Marked depression of dissolved oxygen with depth
occurred at all stations in June and September, 1973.
Survey limnologists noted submerged and emergent vegetation
along much of the shoreline near sampling station 1.
High Falls Pond is one of the two Georgia water bodies listed
in "Problem lakes of the United States" (Ketelle and Uttormark,
1971).
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that High Falls Pond was
phosphorus limited at the time the assay sample was collected
(06/22/73). The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in
September as well but nitrogen limitation in November.
* Table of metric conversions—Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
2
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, the phosphorus
contributions of domestic point sources amounted to 63.7% of the
total phosphorus load. The Griffin wastewater treatment plant
contributed 59.3%, the Georgia Diagnostic Center wastewater treat-
ment plant contributed 3.7%, and the 1-75 Mobile Park wastewater
treatment plant contributed 0.8% of the total phosphorus load.
The wastewater treatment plant serving the Dundee (textile)
Mills at Griffin was not sampled nor were nutrient loads estimated.
However, on the basis of the nutrient export rates of the Towaliga
River at station A-l (see below), it appears the nutrient contri-
butions of this point source probably were not significant,
although the volume of wastes may have been quite large (design
flow = 7,570 mVday).
The present loading rate of 8.07 g/m2/year is over four times
the rate proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974)
as a eutrophie rate (see page 14). However, the mean hydraulic
retention time of High Falls Pond is a short 14 days, and it is
likely that Vollenweider's model does not apply. Nonetheless,
the existing trophic condition of the lake is evidence of excessive
nutrient loads.
-------
It is calculated that 90% phosphorus removal at the domestic
point sources noted above would reduce the phosphorus load to
High Falls Pond by 57+% and reduce the loading rate to 3.44 g/m2/yr.
In view of the questionable applicability of Vollenweider's model,
it is likely that the indicated degree of phosphorus reduction
would result in a significant improvement in the trophic condition
of High Falls Pond.
2. Non-point sources—The phosphorus contributions of non-
point sources accounted for 36.2% of the total phosphorus load
during the sampling year. The Towaliga River contributed 27.7%,
and Buck Creek contributed 5.7% of this load. Ungaged tributaries
were estimated to have contributed 2.6%.
The nutrient export rates of the Towaliga River and Buck Creek
were quite low during the sampling year (see page 14) and compare
very well with nearby unimpacted Tussahaw Creek, tributary to
Jackson Lake*, in which the nutrient export rates were 13 kg P
and 300 kg N per square kilometer of drainage area during the
sampling year.
* Working Paper No. 290.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
2
1. Surface area: 2.43 kilometers .
2. Mean depth: 3.7 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 7.3 meters.
4. Volume: 8.991 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 14 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name Drainage area* Mean flow*
Towaliga River 383.3 km2 5.4 m3/sec
Buck Creek 101.0 km2 1.4 m3/sec
Minor tributaries & 23
immediate drainage - 46.6 km 0.7 m /sec
Totals 530.9 km2 7.5 m3/sec
2. Outlet -
Towaliga River 533.3 km2** 7.5 m3/sec
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 157.9 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 123.1 centimeters.
t Hall, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Total area adjusted to equal sum of subdrainage areas plus the area of
the lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
High Falls Pond was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from three
stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station (see
map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or
near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the three stations
for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 4.6 meters at station 1, 4.6 meters at station 2, and
3.0 meters at station 3.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR HIGH FALLS LAKE
STORET CODE 1319
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY (M(VL>
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (ST&ND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02*N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL M (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A U.m/L>
SFCCHI (METERS)
1ST SAMPLING ( 6/22/73)
3 SITES
2ND SAMPLING ( 9/ 8/73)
3 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (ll/ 8/73)
3 SITES
RANGE
19.6
0.1
57.
6.9
20.
0.023
0.00?
0.040
0.060
0.600
0.110
0.640
7.8
0.9
- 30.6
- 10.4
93.
8.7
35.
- 0.078
- 0.010
- 0.360
- 0.510
- 1.100
- 0.600
- 1.180
- 17.3
1.3
MEAN
25.2
4.1
75.
7.8
28.
0.049
0.005
0.115
0.203
0.791
0.318
0.906
11.1
1.0
MEDIAN
25.1
0.4
80.
8.0
28.
0.047
0.005
0.080
0.120
0.800
0.310
0.850
8.1
0.9
RANGE
20.5
0.1
74.
6.5
24.
0.022
0.005
0.030
0.040
0.600
0.070
0.640
12.7
0.9
- 28.3
7.1
- 175.
8.4
47.
- 0.052
- 0.014
- 0.080
- 1.580
- 1.900
- 1.630
- 1.950
- 25.5
1.2
MEAN
25.6
3.3
100.
7.3
35.
0.039
0.009
0.046
0.327
1.056
0.372
1.101
20.6
1.1
MEDIAN
26.2"
3.0
88.
7.1
34.
0.037
0.009
0.040
0.060
1.000
0.110
1.030
23.7
1.1
RANGE
15.1
6.4
72.
7.2
34.
0.042
0.012
0.020
0.040
0.400
0.060
0.430
5.0
0.9
- 15.6
9.2
80.
7.8
37.
- 0.082
- 0.030
- 0.040
- 0.070
- 0.800
- 0.100
- 0.830
- 20.5
1.0
MEAN
15.4
8.0
76.
7.5
36.
0.056
0.020
0.029'
0.046
0.562
0.075
0.591
' 12.8
1.0
MEDIAN
15.4
8.0
74.
7.4
36.
0.050
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.550
0.075
0.575
12.8
1.0
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
06/22/73
09/08/73
11/08/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Golenkinia
2. Lyngbya
3. Microcystis
4. Nitzschia
5. Staurastrum
Other genera
Total
1. Dactylococcopsis
2. Oscillator-la
3. Lyngbya
4. Raphidlopsis
5. Merismopedia
Other genera
Total
1. Flagellates
2. Dactylococcopsis
3. Cryptomonas
4. Mesostigma
5. Glenodinium
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
1,890
6,995
1,454
1,385
762
554
2,176
13,326
Total
4,029
-------
8
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
06/22/73
09/08/73
11/07-08/73
Station
Number
01
02
03
01
02
03
01
02
03
Chlorophyll a
(yg/1)
7.8
17.3
8.1
23.7
12.7
25.5
5.0
20.5
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.025
0.050
1.0 N
P
P
P
P +
0.5 N
P + 1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.006
0.016
0.026
0.056
0.031
0.056
0.006
2.
Filtered and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/1)
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Control
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.025
0.050
1.0 N
P
P
P
P +
0.5 N
P + 1.0 N
0.003
0.013
0.023
0.053
0.028
0.053
0.003
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.394
0.394
0.394
0.394
0.894
1.394
1.394
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.374
0.374
0.374
0.374
0.874
1.374
1.374
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.1
2.7
8.9
11.0
10.4
23.0
0.1
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.1
2.7
7.6
10.8
10.1
21.3
0.1
-------
3. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
in High Falls Pond was low at the time the assay sample was
taken. Increasing yields with increasing concentrations of
orthophosphorus show that the lake was limited by phosphorus
at that time. Note that the addition of only nitrogen re-
sulted in a yield no different than the control.
The lake data further substantiate phosphorus limitation
at the time the sample was taken; i.e., mean N/P ratios on
June 22, 1973, and on September 8, 1973, were 41/1 or greater.
The November 8, 1973, data indicate nitrogen limitation; i.e.,
the mean N/P ratio was 4/1.
-------
10
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Georgia National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of January and February when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in March, 1973, and was completed in February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Georgia District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads for unsam-
pled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were
estimated using the nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at station B-l and
multiplying by the ZZ area in km2.
The operators of the Georgia Diagnostic Center and Griffin waste-
water treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and correspond-
ing flow data. Monthly effluent samples also were received from the 1-75
Mobile Park wastewater treatment facility; however, flow data were not
provided, and nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg
N/capita/year (the analytical data are included in Appendix E).
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
The Dundee Mills waste treatment facility in Griffin was not
sampled, and the nutrient contributions of this source are unknown.
However, this source appears not to have been significant during the
Survey sampling year (see discussion, page 2).
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known muncipal* -
Name
Georgia
Diagnostic
Center
Griffin
1-75 Mobile
Park
Pop.
Served
2,500
4,000
135**
Treatment
act. sludge
trickling
filter
act. sludge
Mean Flow
(mVd)
238.5
3,277.8
51.1***
Receiving
Water
Unnamed Stream/
Towaliga River
Cabin Creek
Cabin Creek
2. Known industrial* -
Name
Dundee Mills,
Inc. ,
Griffin
Type Waste
domestic,
textile
Treatment
aer. pond,
settling
tank
Design Flow
(mVd)
7,570.0
Receiving
Water
Cabin Creek
* Anonymous, 1972.
** Steele 1973.
*** Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Towaliga River 5,435 27.7
Buck Creek 1,110 5.7
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 515 2.6
c. Known municipal -
Georgia Diagnostic Center 720 3.7
Griffin 11,620 59.3
1-75 Mobile Park 155 0.8
d. Septic tanks* - 5 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Dundee Mills, Inc. ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 45 0.2
Total 19,605 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Towaliga River 14,915
3. Net annual P accumulation - 4,690 kg.
* Estimate based on 12 lakeshore residences; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Towaliga River 136,875 70.2
Buck Creek 23,110 11.9
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 10,670 5.5
c. Known municipal -
Georgia Diagnostic Center 450 0.2
Griffin 20,555 10.6
1-75 Mobile Park 460 0.2
d. Septic tanks* - 130 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Dundee Mills, Inc. ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 2.625 1.4
Total 194,875 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Towaliga River 189,415
3. Net annual N accumulation - 5,460 kg.
* Estimate based on 12 lakeshore residences; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Towaliga River 14 357
Buck Creek 11 229
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 8.07 1.93 80.2 2.2
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of High Falls Pond:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 1.82
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.91
-------
15
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1972. Georgia municipal and industrial wastewater treatment
facilities associated with reservoirs. GA Dept. of Nat. Resources,
Atlanta.
Hall, Edward T., 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
GA Dept. of Nat. Resources, Atlanta.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes of the
United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser., Proj. #16010 EHR,
Wash., DC.
Steele, James N., 1973. Personal communication (1-75 MHP waste treat-
ment plant; population served). Hugh Steele, Inc., Forest Park.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the
phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Nat!. Res.
Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland Waters,
Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
PERCENT OP LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES INUMBER OF LAKES WlT.i HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
1301 ALLATOONA RESERVOIR
1302 BLACKSHEAR LAKE
1303 CHATUGE LAKE
130*. CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
1309 JACKSON LAKE
1310 LAKE SIDNEY LANSER
131 1 NOTTELY RESERVOIR
1312 LAKE SEMINOLE
1313 SINCLAIR LAKE
1314 LAKE EUFAULA
1316 BLUE RIDGE LAKE
1317 LAKE HARDING
1318 BURTON LAKE
1319 HIGH FALLS LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
62 (
38 (
85 (
54 <
8 (
69 «
77 «
31 <
46 <
15 (
92 <
0 (
100 (
23 «
8)
5)
ID
7)
1)
9)
10)
4)
6)
2)
12)
0)
13)
3)
MEDIAN
INORG N
54
31
85
62
8
46
69
15
38
23
92
0
100
77
( 7)
« 4)
( 11)
( 8)
( 1)
( 6)
( 9)
< 2)
« 5)
< 3)
( 12)
( 0)
C 13)
« 10)
500-
MEAN SEC
46 (
0 I
92 <
62 <
15 I
77 (
69 1
38 f
54 1
31 1
85 1
8 I
100 I
23 i
; 6)
; o>
12)
: a)
; 2>
; io>
: 9)
: s)
I 7)
; 4>
i ID
i .1) '
t 13)
( 3)
MEAN
CHLORA
31 C
100 «
69 (
54 «
8 (
77 8
62 «
46 «
23 <
15 1
85 «
38 (
92 «
0 <
4)
13)
9)
7)
1)
10)
8)
6)
3)
2)
11)
5)
12)
0)
15-
MIN 00
31 «
100 (
31 (
31 «
69 «
31 «
31 <
92 C
31 «
77 «
85 <
31 J
31 «
• 31 {
0)
13)
0)
0)
9)
0)
0)
12)
0)
10)
11)
0)
0)
. 0)
MEDIAN
DISS P
62 (
15 (
62 (
46 (
8 «
85 i
85 <
31 «
62 «
•23 5
85 «
0 «
100 !
38 C
7)
2)
71
6)
1)
10)
10)
4)
7)
3) •
10)
0)
13)
5) '
INDEX
NO
286
284
424
309
116
385
393
253
254
184
524
77
523
192
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
1301 ALLATOONA RESEKVOIR
130? BLACKSHEAR LAKE
1303 CHATUGE LAKE
1304 CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
1309 JACKSON LAKE
1310 LAKE SIDNEY LANIER
1311 NOTTELY RESERVOIR
1312 LAKE SEHINOLE
1313 SINCLAIR LAKE
131* LAKE EUFAULA
1316 BLUE RIDGE LAKE
1317 LAKE HARDING
1318 BURTON LAKE
1319 HIGH FALLS LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.020
0.035
0.014
0.024
0.094
0.016
0.015
0.040
0.028
0.048
0.010
0.114
0.007
0.047
MEDIAN
INOUG N
0.150
0.250
0.110
.0.150
0.530
0.180
0.130
0.405
0.230
0.345
0.105
0.640
0.100
0.115
500-
MEAN SEC
443.167
468.091
382.778
439.250
461.385
396.417
405.667
456.133
440.667
457.667
394.889
467.538 '
363.889
459.444
MEAN
CHLOHA
7.489
1.855
6.339
6.715
14.577
5.431
6.656
6.760
8.006
9.083
3.078
7.438
2.733
15.075
15-
MIN 00
14.900
11.700
14.900
14.900
14.800
14.900
14.900
11.800
14.900
14.400
13.000
14.900
14.900
14.900
MEDIAN
DISS P
0.005
0.014
0.005
0.007
0.027
0.004
0.004
0.010
0.005
0.011
0.004
0.045
0.003
0.009
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 1316
2 1318
3 1303
4 1311
5 1310
6 130*
7 1301
8 1302
9 1313
10 1312
11 1319
12 1314
13 1309
14 1317
BLUE RIDGE LAKE
BURTON LAKE
CHATUGE LAKE
NOTTELY RESERVOIR
LAKE SIDNEY LANIER
CLARK HILL RESERVOIR
ALLATOONA RESERVOIR
BLACKSHEAR LAKE
SINCLAIR LAKE
LAKE SEMINOLE
HIGH FALLS LAKE
LAKE EUFAULA
JACKSON LAKE
LAKE HARDING
INDEX NO
524
523
424
393
385
309
286
284
254
253
192
184
116
77
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR GEORGIA
1/9/75
LAKF CODE 1319 HIGH FALLS POND
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM)
SUR-ORfllNAGF
TRIBUTARY AREAfSQ KM)
JAN
FEB
533,5
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL auo
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
1319A1
1319A2
131081
1319ZZ
383.3
533.5
101.0
46.6
5.97 8.55 12.18 7.39
8.33 11.89 16.93 10.38
1.59 2.24 3.20 1.95
0.76 1.10 1.56 0.93
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE s
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS o
NOTE *°* LAKE AREA=?=6 SO KM, NOT INCLUDED IN SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW 06Y FLOW DAY FLOW
5.64
7.84
1.47
0.74
4.39
6.12
1.16
0.57
4.11
5o72
loOO
0.54
2o
3o
0.
Oo
61
62
68
34
2.35
3.26
0»62
033J
2
3
0
0
.44 .
.40
.65
.31
4.42
6.17
1.16
0.59
A
6.
1.
0.
96
88
30
62
5.40
7.52
1.42
0,70
SUMMARY
533.5
530.9
TOTAL
TOTAL
FLOb)
FLOW
IN =
OUT =
90147
90,47
1319A1
1319A2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
?.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1?
1
?
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
T*
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
11.81
11.95
7.70
5.49
6.14
12.54
1.70
1.33
3.00
5.21
14.13
?0.25
16.40
16.62
10.73
7.65
8.55
17.44
2.38
l.«4
4.19
7.25
19.71
?5.34
10
4
1
4
?
19
18
9
10
7
12
10
4
1
4
2
19
18
9
10
7
12
4.87
7.05
3.51
4.47
3.57
1.84
1.10
3.40
2.58
5.44
6.14
6.77
9.83
4.90
6.?3
4.96
2.61
1.56
3.57
7.59 11
7.67 26
24
11
26
24
DAY
FLOW
3»43
3.45
4.76
4.76
4.81
S.95
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORM/rriCH
'.>0«.3IA
1/9/75
LAKE CODE 1319
HIGH "-FALLS POMD
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY -MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
1319B1
1319ZZ
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1?
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
3.09
3.17
2.01
1.44
1.61
3.28
0.45
0.34
0.79
1.36
3.77
4.76
1.50
1.50
1.02
0.71
0.79
1.64
0.23
0.17
0.40
0.65
1.81
2.35
10
4
1
4
2
19
18
9
10
7
12
FLOW HAY
1.27
1.87
0.91
1.19
0.93
0.48
0.28
0.91
0.63
1.44
1.44
24
11
FLOW DAY
0.91
0.91
1.10
FLOW
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/36
131901
33 10 46.0 084 01
HIGH FALLS LAKE
13207 GEORGIA
14.0
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/2?
73/09/08
73/11/08
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/2?
73/09/08
73/11/08
TIME
OF
DAY
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
09 45
09 45
09 45
14 39
14 39
14 39
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0010
0015
0000
0008
0015
0000
0005
0014
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
09 45
09 45
09 45
14 39
14 39
14 39
0000
0005
0010
0015
0000
0008
0015
0000
0005
0014
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
30.6
28.5
21.8
19.6
28.3
25.5
21.2
15.5
15.5
15.4
00665
PH05-TOT
MG/L P
0.034
0.036
0.052
0.023
0.033
0.037
0.030
0.048
0.046
0.042
00300
00
MG/L
10.3
10.4
0.2
0.1
7.1
0.2
0.1
7.4
6.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
7.8
23.7
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
50 70
62
57
90
46 82
86
135
40 72
72
73
11EPALES
3
00400 00410
PH
SU
8.10
a. oo
7.50
6.90
8.10
6.60
6.70
7.40
7.20
7.20
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
26
23
20
34
28
36
41
36
35
34
2181292
0019 FEET DEPTH
00610 00625 00630 80671
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0*970
0.060
0.180
0.510
0.050
0.140
0.780
0.050
0.050
0.070
TOT KJEL
N
KG/I
0.800
0.600
0.600
0.800
1.400
1.000
1.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
N02J.M03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.060
0.130
0.050
0.050
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
PKOS-02S
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.007
0.005
0.003
0.002K
0.014
0.009
0.009
0.012
0.019
0.020
VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN IMDIC4TED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
131902
33 11 13.0 084 01 36.0
HIGH FALLS LAKE
13207 GEORGIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/22
73/09/08
73/11/07
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
16
16
16
16
10
10
10
10
14
14
14
30
30
30
30
10
10
10
10
54
54
54
0000
0005
0010
0013
0000
0005
0008
0015
0000
0005
0010
CENT
30.3
26.5
22.5
20.7
?8.1
26.9
25.0
20.5
15.6
15.5
15.4
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
8.3
0.4
0.3
6.8
3.0
1.0
8.0
8.0
37
45
36
80
63
62
80
80
74
83
175
73
74
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.20
8.10
7.60
7.10
8.40
7.20
6.50
7.70
7.40
7.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
29
22
23
35
30
24
47
36
37
34
2111202
0015
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.100
0.190
0.450
0.050
0.040
1.580
0.040
0.040
0.040
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.900
0.700
1.000
0.800
0.700
1.900
0.800
0.600
0.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.160
0.130
0.1SO
0.040
0.030
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.020
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.004
0.005
0.002K
0.010
0.009
o.ooa
0.005
0.023
0.020
0.017
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/2?
73/09/OS
73/11/07
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 30 0000
16 30 0005
lf> 30 0010
16 30 0013
10 10 0000
10 10 0005
10 10 0015
14 54 0000
14 54 0005
14 54 0010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.045
0.065
0.047
0.045
0.031
0.047
0.022
0.063
0.044
0.052
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
17.3
12.7
5.0
VALUF KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
131903
33 12 03.0 08* 01 58.0
HIGH FALLS LAKE
13207 GEORGIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/23
73/09/08
73/11/08
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/2?
73/09/08
73/11/08
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 55 0000
16 55 0005
16 55 0010
10 40 0000
10 40 0004
10 40 0008
15 13 0000
15 13 0001
15 13 0006
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 55 0000
16 55 0005
16 55 0010
10 40 0000
10 40 0004
10 40 0008
15 13 0000
15 13 0006
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
29.4
25.1
21. fl
28.1
27.1
25.5
15.3
15.3
15.1
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
U.050
0.078
0.061
0.049
0.049
0.052
0.082
0.072
00300
DO
MG/L
6.1
0.4
6.0
5.0
0.8
9.2
9.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
8.1
25.5
?0.5
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
35
37
39
80
85
93
90
89
105
80
80
80
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
su
8.70
8.00
7.40
8.40
7.10
6.60
7.80
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
34
28
32
34
34
42
37
2111202
0012
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.120
0.420
0.060
0.050
0.190
0.040
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.800
1.100
1.000
0.600
0.600
0.700
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.360
0.080
0.050
0.040
0.080
0.020
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.007
0.010
0.004
0.011
0.007
0.006
0.022
7.70
36
0.040
0.600
0.040
0.030
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
384 03
1319A1
OOoO
1319A1
33 13 OOoO
TOw/ALIGIA
13241 15 BARNESVILLE
I/HIGH FALLS POND
ST HWr 36 BftUG AT N END OF LAKE
11EPALE3 2111204
4 OOOO FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/04
73/05/01
73/06/04
73/07/0?
73/07/24
73/09/19
73/10/1*
73/1 1/09
73/12/10
74/01/07
74/01/11
74/02/1?
74/02/26
00*30 00*25
TIME DEPTH N02K.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N'
DAY FEET
08
09
12
13
14
1?
13
13
10
15
14
14
14
50
20
30
30
10
50
30
?5
10
00
30
30
30
MG/L
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
n
0
= 290
.290
,357
c3^9
o3?0
.360
.294
o340
.?3-l)
o430
.39')
04on
.420
.340
MG/L
1 0
lo
K
0.
Oo
lo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Co
Oo
Oo
00
450
150
ooc
210
250
150
460
450
450
300
500
200
600
200
00*10 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oc
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
420
16R
360
046
017
357
052
03R
029
04P
045
040
055
030
MG/L
Oo
Oo
- Oo
0,
Oo
Oo
0*
Oe
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
p
031
022
031
033
054
066
113
115
13R
068
025
035
025
020
MG/L P
Oc095
0.070
0.065
Oo070
0*090
0»130
Ool90
Ool85
Ool65
0 o 1 1 3
Oo090
Oo085
OoOTO
Oo075
-------
.tTRIFVAL
74/12/04
1319A2 1319A2
3.1 10 30.0 084 01 00.0
TOWALIGA ^ItfER
13 15 BARNESVILLE
0/HIGH FALLS POND
B^DG 8F.LO DAM SEC rtD 1698
HEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/04
73/05/01
73/06/04
73/07/02
73/07/24
73/09/10
73/10/18
73/11/09
73/12/10
74/01/07
74/01/11
74/02/12
74/02/26
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF M-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
09
11
14
13
13
14
13
To"
15
14
15
15
30
55
00
00
50
25
00
50
'3d
15
50
00
00
MG/L *G/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
220
IPO
154
176
024
147
015
027
016
024
300
310
252
252
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
320
540
660
390
400
340
690
850
550
600
400
300
QOO
300
00610 00671 00665
Nh3-N PrtOS-niS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
0.
0.
0.
0.
046
399
086
058
Oil
022
021
168
019
036
050
055
085
035
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
014
036
009
022
009
010
010
016
007
012
025
020
020
020
MG/L P
0.050
0.105
0.045
0.060
0.030
0.035
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.095
0.075
0.105
0.100
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/12/04
131961 131
33 11 00.0 0*4 18 00.0
BUCK CREEK
13 15
T/HIGH FALLS
US HWY 75
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/10
73/04/04
73/05/01
73/06/04
73/07/02
73/07/24
73/09/19
73/10/18
73/11/09
73/12/10
74/01/07
74/01/11
74/02/1?
74/02/2*
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJFL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
09
10
13
14
13
13
13
10
15
14
14
14
15
40
43
45
20
10.
45
35
20
10
40
45
45
MG/L
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.168
.168
.180
.220
.220
.010K
.133
.198
.0^1
.160
.224
.192
.200
.176
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
975
370
720
200
210
360
370
275
300
300
100
100
500
200
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
063
147
115
050
037
018
040
046
020
040
055
080
090
045
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
008
007
005K
008
008
008
009
012
008
008
005K
005K
007
005
MG/L P
0.030
0.035
0.020
0.025
0.020
0.040
0.035
0.020
0.035
0.010
0.015
0.005
0.025
0.035
DEPTH
VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/06
1319AA AS1319AA P002500
33 12 50.0 084 03 30.0
GEORGIA DIOGNOSTIC CENTER
13241 15 BARNESVILLE
T/HIGH FALLS POND
UNNAMED STREAM/TOWALIGA RIVER
11EPALES 21412*4
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/07
CP(T)-
73/05/07
73/06/07
CP-
73/06/07
73/07/10
CP-
73/07/10
73/09/05
CP(T>-
73/09/05
73/10/02
73/11/05
CP(T)-
73/11/05
73/12/03
CP(T)-
73/12/03
74/0 I/OS
CP-
74/6l/0<)
74/02/05
CP-
74/04/01
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
09
14
10
15
09
14
09
14
09
08
12
09
13
08
1?
07
13
08
12
08
14
30
30
00
00
30
30
00
00
30
45
45
10
00
30
30
45
35
no
10
00
30
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
.085
.052
.010K
.260
.300
.190
.600
.680
.160
.040
4.900
4.100
3.600
5.540
5.900
6.900
8.400
3.400
2.400
2.600
00610 00671
NH3-N PHOS-DIS
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0.095 5.700
0.076 5.060
0.067 4.000
0.190 13.700
0.110 8.400
0.190 10.000
0.110 9.950
0.050 8.900
0.050K 6.600
00665 50051
PHOS-TOT FLOW
RATE
MG/L P INST MOD
6.200
5.500
4.600
15.200
8.700
11.000
9.950
9.800
7.800
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.072
.075
.075
.069
.048
.038
.073
.049
.072
.068
.065
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MOD
MONTHLY
0
-
0
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
.075
.072
.072
.069
.048
.038
.063
.049
.069
.068
.072
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
-------
STJRET RETRIEVAL DATE 7S/GI/06
131921 TF131921
33 16 40.0 084 15 30.0
GRIFFIN
13207 1:250000 ATLANTA
T/HIGH FALLS POND
CABIN CREEK/TOWALIGA RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET
P018000
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/1?
73/05/15
73/06/1=;
73/07/16
73/03/14
73/09/14
73/10/11
73/1 1/1?
73/12/1?
74/01/11
74/02/1,?
74/03/13
74/04/11
TIMF DEPTH
OF
DAY FFET
14 00
09 no
OR 00
16 00
OH 00
OR 00
Ofl 00
OR 30
OR 00
08 00
13 00
OB 00
08 00
00*30
NO PS, NO 3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
3.800
8.400
?.200
7.800
4.600
9.300
14.800
13.000
17.000
9.900
7.400
9.600
8.500
006?5
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
12.600
7.700
14.700
13.200
10.500
5.100
5.700
7.200
10.500
4.QOO
7.800
4.600
4.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
7.200
3.500
6.300
6.900
0.880
1.900
3.300
3.690
3.500
1.300
3.450
1.750
0.820
00671
PHOS-DIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
6.400
10.500
5.900
9.700
3.100
11.200
12.000
8.800
8.700
6.400
5.800
4.900
3.900
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
8.100
11.500
9.520
11.500
17.000
11.500
12.000
10.000
10.800
7.300
7.700
5.600
4.850
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MOD
1.320
1.030
1.200
1.260
1.170
1.200
1.110
1.140
1.050
1.200
1.320
1.200
1.260
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MGD
MONTHLY
0.886
0.990
0.907
0.900
0.844
0.788
0.809
0.826
0.809
0.810
0.879
0.868
0.945
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/06
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/10
CP(T>-
73/05/10
73/06/lfl
CP(T)-
73/06/lfl
73/07/23
CP(T)-
73/07/33
73/08/33
CP-
73/08/23
73/09/25
CP(T)-
73/09/25
73/10/23
CP-
73/10/23
73/11/26
CP(T)-
73/11/26
74/01/01
CP(T>-
74/01/01
74/02/11
CP(T)-
74/02/11
74/03/14
CP-
74/03/14
74/04/24
CP(T)-
74/04/24
74/05/23
CP(T)-
74/05/23
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
10
20
07
16
08
16
08
16
08
16
08
16
09
16
OB
15
08
16
10
18
09
18
09
17
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.035
.010K
.050
.063
.300
.140
.140
.280
.530
.360
.320
.767
5
1
4
5
1
3
2
4
4
2
4
6
.000
.900
.100
.700
.300
.300
.600
.BOO
.900
.800
.800
.300
00610 00671
NH3-N PHOS-DIS
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
.150
.360
.000
.151
.010K
.034
.140
.310
.120
.250
.000
.850
8.
8.
5.
11.
13.
9.
7.
11.
8.
9.
8.
5.
800
400
600
600
900
000
000
200
300
700
400
100
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
9.300
8.800
9.500
13.000
12.900
9.800
7.500
13.000
9.100
10.500
9.300
8.800
131931 AS131931 P000135
33 1* 30.0 08* 06 00.0
1-75 MOBILE PARK
13 15 BARNESVILLE
T/HIGH FALLS PONO
CABIN CREEK/TOWALIGA RIVER
11EPALES 2141304
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
50051 50053
FLOW CONDUIT
RATE FLOW-MOD
VALUE KNOWN TO 8E LESS
THAN INDICATED
-------
STOPET RETP.IF.VAL. DATE 75/01/06
131931 AS131931 P000135
33 14 30.0 084 06 00.0
1-75 MOBILE PARK
13 15 BARNESVILLE
T/HIGH FALLS POND
CABIN CREEK/TOWALIGA RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FP9M
TO
TIMF
OF
DAY
00630 0062S
DEPTH "JQVS.N03 TOT KJEL
M- TOTAL N
FEET MG/
L MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
pHOS-nis
00665
PHOS-TOT
OPTHO
MG/L
P
MG/L
P
50051
FLOW
RATE
1NST
MGD
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MOD
MONTHLY
74/06/03 09 90
CP(T)-
74/06/03 17 00
•1.160
P.OOO
0.081
7.900
8.100
------- |