U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY WORKING PAPER SERIES REPORT ON CRAB ORCHARD LAI€ JACKSON AND WILLIAMSON COUNTIES ILLINOIS EPA REGION V WORKING PAPER No, 301 CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON and ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 699-440 ------- REPORT ON CRAB ORCHARD LAI€ JACKSON AND WILLIAMSON COUNTIES ILLINOIS EPA REGION V WORKING PAPER No, 301 WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v AND THE ILLINOIS NATIONAL GUARD JUNE, 1975 784 ------- CONTENTS Page Foreword i 1 List of Illinois Study Lakes iv Lake and Drainage Area Map v Sections I. Conclusions 1 II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4 III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5 IV. Nutrient Loadings 9 V. Literature Reviewed 15 VI. Appendices 16 ------- ii FOREWORD The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation- wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and reservoirs. OBJECTIVES The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point source pollution abatement in lake watersheds. ANALYTIC APPROACH The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that: a. A generalized representation or model relating sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed. b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters associated with lake degradation, the generalized model can be transformed into an operational representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients. c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the potential for eutrophication control can be made. LAKE ANALYSIS In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water- shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. ------- 111 Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi- tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA and to augment plans implementation by the states. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The staff of the National Eutrophicatlon Survey (Office of Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for professional involvement and to the Illinois National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey. Dr. Richard H. Briceland, Director of the Illinois Environ- mental Protection Agency; and Ronald M. Barganz, State Survey Coordinator, and John J. Forneris, Manager of Region III, Field Operations Section of the Division of Water Pollution Control, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series. Major General Harold R. Patton, the Adjutant General of Illinois, and Project Officer Colonel Daniel L. Fane, who directed the volunteer efforts of the Illinois National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey. ------- iv NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY STUDY LAKES STATE OF ILLINOIS LAKE NAME Baldwin Bloomington Carlyle Cedar Charleston Coffeen Crab Orchard Decatur DePue East Loon Fox Grass Highland Silver Holiday Horseshoe Long Lou Yaeger Marie Old Ben Mine Pistakee Raccoon Rend Sangchris Shelbyville Slocum Springfield Storey Vandalia Vermilion Wee Ma Tuk Wonder COUNTY Randolph McLean Bond, Clinton, Fayette Lake Coles Montgomery Jackson, Williamson Macon Bureau Lake Lake Lake Madison LaSalle Madison Lake Montgomery Lake Franklin Lake, McHenry Marion Franklin, Jefferson Christian Moultrie, Shelby Lake Sangamon Knox Fayette Vermilion Fulton McHenry ------- T Crab Orchard • CRAB ORCHARD LAKE <8> Tributary Sampling Site x Lake Sampling Site 5 Sewage Treatment Plant X? Drainage Area Boundary \ 2 « ? a Km. 0 2 3 4 5 Mi. Scale 3745- 3735- 89105' 88,55 88 ------- CRAB ORCHARD LAKE STORE! NO. 1712 I. CONCLUSIONS A. Trophic Condition: Survey data show that Crab Orchard Lake Is eutrophic. It ranked eighth in overall trophic quality when the 31 Illinois lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six lake parameters*. Ten of the lakes had less median total phos- phorus, four had less and one had the same median dissolved phosphorus, two had less and one had the same median inorganic nitrogen, 24 had less mean chlorophyll a_, and 17 had greater mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at sampling station 1 in August, 1973. Survey limnologists reported a blue-green algal bloom in progress in August and noted the occurrence of submergent and emergent aquatic macrophytes in the shoreline shallows near all three sampling stations. B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient: A significant change in primary nutrients occurred in the assay sample between the time of collection and the beginning of the assay, and the results are not representative of condi- tions in the lake at the time the sample was taken (05/08/73). * See Appendix A. ------- The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in May but nitrogen limitation in August and October. C. Nutrient Controllability: 1. Point sources—The estimated phosphorus contribution of point sources amounted to 26.3% of the total load reaching the lake during the sampling year. The City of Marion was estimated to have contributed 20.3% and the other four point sources 6.0% of the total load. The Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge provides a winter- ing area for a large segment of the Mississippi flyway Canada goose flock as well as many flyway ducks, and it is estimated that ducks and geese contributed 7.9% of the total phosphorus load to Crab Orchard Lake during the sampling year (see page 10). The present phosphorus loading rate of 2.82 g/m2/yr is over seven times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic rate (see page 14). Even complete removal of phosphorus at the point sources would only reduce the loading rate to 2.07 g/m2/yr (still over five times the dangerous rate). However, Crab Orchard Lake is phosphorus limited part of the time, and it is likely that a high degree of phosphorus control at the point sources would result in ------- persistent phosphorus limitation and a reduction in the Incidence and severity of nuisance algal blooms, particularly if a significant portion of the phosphorus export of Crab Orchard Creek proves to be controllable (see below). 2. Non-point sources—It is estimated that non-point sources accounted for 65.8% of the total phosphorus load reaching Crab Orchard Lake during the sampling year. However, Crab Orchard Creek had a very high phosphorus export rate of 221 kg/km2/yr (see page 14). It 1s unlikely that the high rate resulted solely from underestimation of the phosphorus loads from the City of Marion and the Crab Orchard School; e.g., the phosphorus load for Marion would have to be nearly three times greater than the estimated load to lower the Crab Orchard Creek export rate to that of Wolf Creek (16 kg/km2/yr). Therefore, it appears that either there are other point sources in the Crab Orchard Creek drainage or land-use practices result in an unusually high phosphorus export. In either case, a heed for further study of the drainage is indicated. ------- II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1" A. Lake Morphometry : 1. Surface area: 28.19 kilometers2. 2. Mean depth: 3.0 meters. 3. Maximum depth: >6.1 meters. 4. Volume: 84.570 x 106 m3. 5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 288 days. B. Tributary and Outlet: (See Appendix C for flow data) 1. Tributaries - Drainage Mean flow Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)* Crab Orchard Creek 213.9 1.4 Pigeon Creek 10.3 0.1 Wolf Creek 33.2 0.2 Pin Oak Creek 4.6 <0.1 Minor tributaries & immediate drainage - 230.4 1.7 Totals 492.4 3.4 2. Outlet - Crab Orchard Creek 520.6** 3.4 C. Precipitation***: 1. Year of sampling: 124.0 centimeters. 2. Mean annual: 112.3 centimeters. t Table of metric conversions--Appendix B. tt Forneris, 1973. * For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods, 1973-1976". ** Includes area of lake. *** See Working Paper No. 175. ------- III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY Crab Orchard Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from three stations on the lake and usually from two or more depths at each station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 6.1 meters at station 1, 3.0 meters at sta- tion 2, and 1.2 meters at station 3. The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are summarized in the following table. ------- PARAMETER TEMP (C) DISS OXY (MG/L1 CNDCTVY (MCROM( PH (STAND UNIT! TOT ALK (MG/L) TOT P (MG/L) ORTMO P (MG/L) N02*N03 (MG/L) AMMONIA (MG/L) KJEL N (MG/L) INORG N (MG/L) TOTAL N (MG/L) CHLRPYL A (UG/L SECCHI (METERS) A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND 1ST SAMPLING ( 5/ 3 SITES RANGE MEAN 17.6 - 18.4 18.2 7.8 - 8.8 8.3 200. - 300. 253. 8.1 - 8.3 8.2 30. - 39. 37. 0.053 - 0.227 0.106 0.006 - 0.022 0.012 0.060 - 0.220 0.109 0.080 - 0.140 0.100 0.600 - 1.100 0.733 0.160 - 0.360 0.209 0.660 - 1.220 0.842 3.4 - 58.5 26.1 0.1 - 0.6 0.4 CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR STORET CODE 1712 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 8/73) MEDIAN IB. 3 8.2 240. 8.1 38. 0.081 0.011 0.100 0.100 0.700 0.200 0.790 16.4 0.5 2ND SAMPLING ( 8/ 8/73) 3 SITES RANGE 27.1 1.2 265. 7.1 54. 0.051 0.007 0.070 0.090 1.500 0.160 1.570 24.6 0.3 - 30.3 - 14.0 - 290. 9.0 66. - 0.424 - 0.115 - 0.200 - 0.320 - 3.600 - 0.400 - 3.800 - 225.4 0.8 MEAN 28.9 6.6 274. 8.2 58. 0.155 0.035 0.116 0.156 2.150 0.272 2.266 106.8 0.6 MEDIAN 29.0 7.2 272. 8.2 56. 0.084 0.012 0.100 0.135 1.800 0.260 1.900 70.4 0.7 3RD SAMPLING (10/19/73) 3 SITES MANGE 18.5 5.6 222. 7.5 48. 0.071 0.007 0.040 0.040 0.600 0.080 o.aoo 29.4 0.3 - 20.6 9.4 - 294. 8.4 65. - 0.257 - 0.047 - 0.220 - 0.070 - 1.900 - 0.290 - 1.970 - 77.6 0.4 MEAN 20.0 7.4 235. 7.8 54. 0.114 0.020 0.130 0.057 0.900 0.187 1.030 46.7 0.4 MEDIAN 20.2 7.3 224. 7.7 S3. 0.092 O.OIb 0.135 0.060 0.750 0.190 0.840 33.1 0.4 ------- B. Biological characteristics: 1. Phytoplankton - Sampling Date 05/08/73 08/08/73 10/19/73 Dominant Genera 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Cyclotella sp. Melosira sp. Coccoid Chrysophyta Dactylococcopsis sp. Cryptomonas sp. Other genera Total Oscillatoria £p_. Dactylococcopsis Coccoid cells Cyclotella sp. Pennate diatoms Other genera Total Coccoid cells Dactylococcopsis Oscillatoria s£. Pennate diatoms Microcystis sp. Other genera sp. Algal units per ml 12,226 7,763 2,474 776 679 3.105 27,023 30,614 21,930 10,350 7,281 7,281 32,806 110,262 33,481 8,830 7,358 4,139 4,047 11,588 Total 69,444 ------- 8 2. Chlorophyll a_ - Sampling Station Chlorophyll a_ Date Number (ug/1) 05/08/73 01 3.4 02 16.4 03 58.5 08/08/73 01 24.6 02 70.4 03 225.4 10/19/73 01 29.4 02 33.1 03 77.6 C. Limiting Nutrient Study: A 15% loss of inorganic nitrogen and a 150% gain in ortho- phosphorus occurred in the assay sample between the time of collection and the beginning of the assay, and the limiting nutrient was shifted from phosphorus in the lake (the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratio was 17/1) to nitrogen limitation in the assay sample (N/P = 6/1). Consequently, the assay results are not representative of conditions in the lake at the time the sample was taken (05/08/73). As noted above, the lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in May; however, nitrogen limitation is indicated in August (N/P 8/1) and October (N/P = 9/1). ------- IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS (See Appendix E for data) For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Illinois National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in June, 1973, and was completed in May, 1974. Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by the Illinois District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary sites nearest the lake. In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter- mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer program for calculating stream loadings*. Except for Pin Oak Creek and Pigeon Creek, nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-source loads, 1f any. However, the combined estimated nutrient loads for Carterville and Crainville exceeded those measured in Pin Oak Creek, and the estimated Refuge Headquarters loads exceeded the loads measured in Pigeon Creek. Therefore, the background loads for these two streams were estimated using the nutrient loads, in. kg/km2/yr, in Wolf Creek at station C-l and multiplying by the Pin Oak Creek and Pigeon Creek drainage areas in km2. * See Working Paper No. 175. ------- 10 Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and Immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at station C-l and multiplying by the ZZ area in km2. The City of Marion, the villages of Carterville and Crainville, and the Crab Orchard School did not participate in the sampling program, and nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/ year. Estimates of nutrient contributions by wild ducks and geese utilizing Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge were based on 50,000 over-wintering geese reported by the Fish and Wildlife Service (Anonymous, 1969) and the following assumptions: 1. One-half as many ducks as geese over-winter. 2. Winter resident waterfowl are at the lake for five months. 3. Each wild duck contributes 0.20 kg total phosphorus and 0.45 kg total nitrogen per year (Paloumpis and Starrett, 1960). 4. Each wild goose contributes the same amount of phosphorus and nitrogen as one wild duck since geese typically feed in fields away from the lake several hours each day. ------- 11 A. Waste Sources: 1. Known mundpal Name Marion Carterville Crab Orchard School Crab Orchard Refuge Hdq. Crainville 2. Industrial - In 1969, some 26 firms in the Crab Orchard Lake drainage produce hardware for the space program, explosives, office supplies, chemicals, solvents, and a variety of other products (Anonymous, 1969). The current status and nutrient significance of these industries is not known. Pop. Served 14,180 1,600 80 2,000 549** Treatment trickling filter act. sludge trickling filter act. sludge aer. ponds Mean Flow (mVd)* 5,367.1 605.6 30.3 757.0 207.8 Receiving Water Crab Orchard Creek Pin Oak Creek Crab Orchard Creek Pigeon Creek Pin Oak Creek t Anonymous, 1972. * Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day. ** 1970 Census. ------- 12 B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year: 1. Inputs - kg P/ % of Source ^r total a. Tributaries (non-point load) - Crab Orchard Creek 47,270 59.5 Pigeon Creek 165 0.2 Wolf Creek 520 0.7 Pin Oak Creek 75 0.1 b. Minor tributaries & immediate drainage (non-point load) - 3,685 4.6 c. Known municipal STP's - Marion 16,080 20.3 Carterville 1,815 2.3 Crab Orchard School 90 0.1 Crab Orchard Refuge Hdq. 2,270 2.9 Crainville 625 0.8 d. Septic tanks* - 15 <0.1 e. Industrial - Unknown ? f. Ducks and geese - 6,250 7.9 g. Direct precipitation** - 495 0.6 Total 79,355 100.0 2. Outputs - Lake outlet - Crab Orchard Creek 16,160 3. Net annual P accumulation - 63,195 kg. * Estimate based on two marinas and five campgrounds; see Working Paper No. 175. ** See Working Paper No. 175. ------- 13 C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year: 1. Inputs - kg N/ % of Source ^r total a. Tributaries (non-point load) - Crab Orchard Creek 131,295 35.8 Pigeon Creek 4,740 1.3 Wolf Creek 15,265 4.2 Pin Oak Creek 2,115 0.6 b. Minor tributaries & immediate drainage (non-point load) - 105,985 28.9 c. Known municipal STP's - Marion 48,225 13.1 Cartervilie 5,440 1.5 Crab Orchard School 270 <0.1 Crab Orchard Refuge Hdq. 6,800 1.9 Crainville 1,865 0.5 d. Septic tanks* - 570 0.2 e. Industrial - Unknown ? f. Ducks and geese - 14,065 3.8 g. Direct precipitation** - 30.435 8.2 Total 367,070 100.0 2. Outputs - Lake outlet - Crab Orchard Creek 164,625 3. Net annual N accumulation - 202,445 kg. * Estimate based on two marinas and five campgrounds; see Working Paper No. 175. ** See Working Paper No. 175. ------- 14 D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area: Tributary . kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr N/P Ratio Crab Orchard Creek 221* 614 3/1 Wolf Creek 16 460 29/1 E. Yearly Loading Rates: In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen- weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate 1s that which would result in the receiving water remaining ollgotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible". Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to water bodies with short hydraulic retention times. Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Total Accumulated Total Accumulated grams/mVyr 2.82 2.2 13.0 7.2 Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus (g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean hydraulic retention time of Crab Orchard Lake: "Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 0.38 "Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.19 * Unusually high export rate probably is indicative of unmeasured point-source influence. ------- 15 V. LITERATURE REVIEWED Anonymous, 1969. Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois. Leaflet 9-R-3, Fish & W1ldl. Serv., U.S. Dept. Interior, Washington, DC. Anonymous, 1972. Wastewater treatment works data book. IL Env. Prot. Agency, Springfield. Forneris, John J., 1973. Personal communication (lake morphometry). IL Env. Prot. Agency, Springfield. Manny, B. A., R. G. Wetzel, and W. C. Johnson, 1975. Annual contri- bution of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus by migrant Canada geese to a hardwater lake. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 19, pp. 949-951 Paloumpsis, A. A., and W. C. Starrett, 1960. An ecological study of benthic organisms in three Illinois River flood plain lakes. Amer. Midi. Nat., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 406-435. Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophicatlon research. Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario. ------- VI. APPENDICES APPENDIX A LAKE RANKINGS ------- LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS LAKE CODE 1703 1706 1708 1711 1712 1714 1735 1736 1727 1733 1735 1739 1740 17*2 1748 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 .1756 1757 1758 1759 1761 1762 1763 LAKE NAME LAKE BLOOM I NOT ON LAKE CARLYLE LAKE CHARLESTON COrFEEN LAKE CRAB ORCHARD LAKE LAKE OECATUR LONG LAKE LAKE LOU YAEGER LAKE MARIE PISTAKEE LAKE REND LAKE LAKE SHELBYVILLE SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) LAKE SPRINGFIELD VERMILION LAKE WONDER LAKE LAKE STORY DEPUE LAKE LAKE SANGCnHIS LAKE HOLIDAY FOX LAKE GRASS LAKE EAST LOON LAKE SLOCUM LAKE CEDAR LAKE LAKE WEMATUK RACCOON LAKE BALDWIN LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .050 .084 .160 .032 .082 .129 .704 .186 .098 .203 .071 .062 .226 .108 .109 .426 .072 .438 .050 .167 .219 .301 .076 .865 .029 .069 0.106 0.044 MEDIAN INORG N s 1 4 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 4 0 2 4 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 .730 .270 .680 .260 .200 .750 .190 .600 .370 .370 .210 .290 .970 .265 .695 .890 .510 .050 .970 .135 .375 .820 .120 .200 .170 .770 .310 .140 500- MEAN SEC 464 477 490 456 482 479 482 489 467 485 471 461 489 483 481 486 459 490 475 485 486 481 450 487 400 466 484 461 .667 .889 .667 .222 .222 .571 .667 .583 .667 .667 .500 .333 .500 .385 .500 .000 .333 .000 .417 .167 .167 .000 .000 .333 .333 .333 .333 .167 MEAN CHLORA 26.200 17.367 12.000 7.700 59.867 43.000 49.333 10.662 39.533 75.867 23.533 17.161 5.822 13.013 31.150 98.533 17.250 58.833 19.292 51.217 63.850 83.500 22.300 221.100 5.767 7.967 19.217 11.333 15- MIN DO ' 14 11 8 14 13 14 8 11 14 7 12 14 14 10 14 7 14 7 14 7 8 5 14 5 12 14 13 13 .800 .000 .400 .900 .800 .500 . .800 .400 .700 .000 .700 .800 .800 .800 .200 .800 .800 .600 .500 .200 .800 .900 .900 .800 .800 .500 .800 .200 MEDIAN DISS OKTHO P 0.020 0.032 0.065 0.012 0.013 0.062 0.398 0.076 0.057 0.062 0.012 0.019 0.057 0.059 0.050 0.132 0.021 0.276 0.009 0.046 0.083 0.093 0.01H 0.362 0.013 0.031 0.020 0.007 ------- VI. APPENDICES APPENDIX A LAKE RANKINGS ------- LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN HANK INGS LAKE CODE 1703 1706 1708 1711 1712 1714 1725 1726 1727 1733 1735 1739 mo 17*2 1748 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1761 1762 1763 LAKE NAME LAKE BLOOMINGTON LAKE CARLYLE LAKE CHARLESTON COFFEEN LAKE CRAB ORCHARD LAKE LAKE OECATUR LONG LAKE LAKE LOU YAEGER LAKE MARIE PISTAKEE LAKE REND LAKE LAKE SHELtJYVILLE SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) LAKE SPRINGFIELD VERMILION LAKE WONDER LAKE LAKE STORY OEPUE LAKE LAKE SANGCHrtIS LAKE HOLIDAY FOX LAKE GRASS LAKE EAST LOON LAKE SLOCUM LAKE CEDAR LAKE LAKE WEMATUK RACCOON LAKE BALDWIN LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .050 .084 .160 .032 .082 .129 .704 .186 .098 .203 .071 .062 .226 .109 .109 .426 .072 .438 .050 .167 .219 .301 .076 0.865 0 0 0 0 .029 .069 .106 .044 MEDIAN INORG N 5.730 1.270 4.680 0.260 0.200 3.750 1.190 1.600 0.370 0.370 0.210 3.290 0.970 3.265 4.695 0.890 2.510 4.050 1.970 3.135 0.375 0.820 0.120 0.200 0.170 1.770 0.310 0.140 500- MEAN SEC 464 477 490 456 482 479 482 489 467 485 471 461 489 483 481 486 459 490 475 485 486 481 450 487 400 466 484 461 .667 .889 .667 .222 .222 .571 .667 .583 .667 .667 .500 .333 .500 .385 .500 .000 .333 .000 .417 .167 .167 .000 .000 .333 .333 .333 .333 .167 MEAN CHLORA 26. 17. 12. 7. 59. 43. 49. 10. 39. 75. 23. 17. 5. 13. 31. 98. 17. 58. 19. 51. 63. 83. 22. 221. 5. 7. 19. 11. 200 367 000 700 867 000 333 662 533 867 533 161 822 013 150 533 250 833 292 217 850 500 300 100 767 967 217 333 15- MIN DO 14 11 a 14 13 14 e 11 14 7 12 14 14 10 14 7 14 7 14 7 8 5 14 5 12 14 13 13 .800 .000 .400 .900 .800 .500 .800 .400 .700 .000 .700 .800 .800 .800 .200 .800 .800 .600 .500 .200 .800 .900 .900 .800 .800 .500 .800 .200 MEDIAN OISS OKTHO P 0.020 0.032 0.065 0.012 0.013 0.062 0.398 0.076 0.057 0.062 0.012 0.019 0.057 0.059 0.050 0.132 0.021 0.276 0.009 0.046 0.083 0.093 0.01M 0.362 O.OU 0.031 0.020 0.007 ------- VI. APPENDICES APPENDIX A LAKE RANKINGS ------- LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS LAKE CODE 1703 1706 1708 1711 1712 1714 1785 1736 1727 1733 1735 1739 17*0 ma 1748 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1761 1762 1763 LAKE NAME LAKE ULOOMINGTON LAKE CARLYLE LAKE CHARLESTON COFFEEN LAKE CRAfl ORCHARD LAKE LAKE OECATUK LONG LAKE LAKE LOU YAEGER LAKE MARIE PISTAKEE LAKE REND LAKE LAKE SHELbYVILLE SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) LAKE SPRINGFIELD VERMILION LAKE WONDER LAKE LAKE STORY OEPUE LAKE LAKE SANGCnttIS LAKE HOLIDAY FOX LAKE GRASS LAKE EAST LOON LAKE SLOCUM LAKE CEDAR LAKE LAKE MEMATUK RACCOON LAKE 8ALOUIN LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .050 .084 .160 .032 .082 .129 .704 .186 .098 .203 .071 .062 .226 .108 .109 .426 .072 .438 .050 .167 .219 .301 .076 .865 .029 .069 .106 .044 MEDIAN INORG N 5.730 1.270 4.680 0.260 0.200 3.750 1.190 1.600 0.370 0.370 0.210 3.290 0.970 3.265 4.695 0.890 2.510 4.050 1.970 3.135 0.375 0.820 0.120 0.200 0.170 1.770 0.310 0.140 500- MEAN SEC 464 477 490 456 482 479 482 489 467 485 471 461 489 483 481 486 459 490 475 485 486 481 450 487 400 466 484 461 .667 .889 .667 .222 .222 .571 .667 .583 .667 .667 .500 .333 .500 .385 .500 .000 .333 .000 .417 .167 .167 .000 .000 .333 .333 .333 .333 .167 MEAN CHLORA 26. 17. 12. 7. 59. 43. 49. 10. 39. 75. 23. 17. 5. 13. 31. 98. 17. 58. 19. 51. 63. 83. 22. 221. 5. 7. 19. 11. 200 367 000 700 867 000 333 662 533 867 533 161 822 013 150 533 250 833 292 217 850 500 300 100 767 967 217 333 15- MIN 00 14. 11. a. 14. 13. 14. e. n. 14. 7. 12. 14. 14. 10. 14. 7. 14. 7. 14. 7. 8. 5. 14. 5. 12. 14. 13. 13. 800 000 400 900 BOO 500 . 800 400 700 000 700 800 800 800 200 800 800 600 500 200 800 900 900 800 800 500 800 200 MEDIAN DISS OKTHO P 0.020 0.032 0.065 0.012 0.013 0.062 0.398 0.076 0.057 0.062 0.012 0.019 0.057 0.059 0.050 0.132 0.021 0.276 0.009 0.046 0.083 0.093 O.OlH 0.362 0.013 0.031 0.020 0.007 ------- VI. APPENDICES APPENDIX A LAKE RANKINGS ------- LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS LAKE CODE 1703 1706 1708 1711 1712 1714 1735 1726 1727 1733 1735 1739 1740 1742 1748 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 .1756 1757 1758 1759 1761 1762 1763 LAKE NAME LAKE BLOOHINGTON LAKE CARLYLE LAKE CHARLESTON COFFEEN LAKE CRAB ORCHARD LAKE LAKE OECATUR LONG LAKE LAKE LOU YACGER LAKE MARIE PISTAKEE LAKE REND LAKE LAKE SHELBYVILLE SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) LAKE SPRINGFIELD VERMILION LAKE WONDER LAKE LAKE STORY OEPUE LAKE LAKE SANGCnRIS LAKE HOLIDAY FOX LAKE GRASS LAKE EAST LOON LAKE SLOCUM LAKE CEDAR LAKE LAKE WEMATUK RACCOON LAKE BALOMIN LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .050 .084 .160 .032 .032 .129 .704 .166 .098 .203 .071 .062 .226 .108 .109 .426 .072 .438 .050 .167 .219 .301 .076 .865 .029 .069 .106 .044 MEDIAN INORG N 5. 1. 4. 0. 0. 3. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 3. 0. 3. 4. 0. 2. 4. 1. 3. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 730 270 680 260 200 750 190 600 370 370 210 290 970 265 695 890 510 050 970 135 375 620 120 200 170 770 310 140 500- MEAN SEC 464 477 490 456 482 479 482 489 467 485 471 461 489 483 481 486 459 490 475 485 486 481 450 487 400 466 484 461 .667 .889 .667 .222 .222 .571 .667 .583 .667 .667 .500 .333 .500 .385 .500 .000 .333 .000 .417 .167 .167 .000 .000 .333 .333 .333 .333 .167 MEAN CHLORA 26 17 12 7 59 43 49 10 39 75 23 17 5 13 31 98 17 SB 19 51 63 83 22 221 5 7 19 11 .200 .367 .000 .700 .867 .000 .333 .662 .533 .867 .533 .161 .822 .013 .150 .533 .250 .833 .292 .217 .850 .500 .300 .100 .767 .967 .217 .333 15- MIN DO °14.800 11.000 8.400 14.900 13. BOO 14.500 8.800 11.400 14.700 7.000 12.700 14.800 14.800 10.800 14.200 7.800 14.800 7.600 14.500 7.200 8.800 5.900 14.900 5.800 12.800 14.500 13.800 13.200 MEDIi DISS OKTl 0.020 0.032 0.065 0.012 0.013 0.062 0.398 0.076 0.057 0.062 0.012 0.019 0.057 0.059 0.050 0.132 0.021 0.276 0.009 0.046 0.083 0.093 0.01W 0.362 0.013 0.031 0.020 0.007 ------- LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS LAKE CODE LAKE NAME 1764 LAKE VANDALIA 1765 OLD BEN MINE KESERVOIR 1766 HORSESHOE LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 0.116 0.930 0.127 MEDIAN INOR6 N 0.480 0.205 0.705 500- MEAN SEC 478.111 478.333 482.833 MEAN CHLORA 11.276 31.433 182.250 15- MIN DO 14.800 11.200 6.600 MEDIAN DISS OHThO 0.023 0.575 0.01B ------- PERCENT Of LAKES MITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES KITH HIGHER VALUES) LAKE CODE 1703 1706 rm 1711 1712 1714 1725 172t 1727 1733 1735 1739 1740 1742 1748 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1761 1762 1763 LAKE NAME LAKE SLOOMINGTON LAKE CARLYLE LAKE CHARLESTON COFFEEN LAKE CRAB ORCHARD LAKE LAKE DECATUR LONG LAKE LAKE LOU YAEGER LAKE MARIE PISTAKEE LAKE RENO LAKE LAKE SHELBYVILLE SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND) LAKE SPRINGFIELD VERMILION LAKE WONDER LAKE LAKE STORY DEPUE LAKE LAKE SANGCHRIS LAKE HOLIDAY FOX LAKE GRASS LAKE EAST LOON LAKE SLOCUM LAKE CEDAR LAKE LAKE WCTATUK RACCOON LAKE BALDWIN LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 88 63 37 9T 67 40 7 30 60 27 77 83 20 53 50 13 73 10 80 33 23 17 70 3 100 80 57 93 ( 26) ( 19) ( 11) ( 29) ( 20) 1 121 ( 2) ( 9) ( 18) ( 8) < 23) ( 25) ( 6) ( lib) ( 15) ( 4) < 22) < 3) ( 26) ( 10) ( 7) ( 5) 1 21) < D ( 30) 1 24) 1 17) 1 28) ' MEDIAN INORG N 0 < 0) 40 ( 12) 7 ( 2) 77 < 23) 90 ( 27) 13 < 4) 43 1 13) 37 1 11) • 68 ( 201 68 ( 20) 80 I 24) 17 » S) 47 ( 14) 20 C 6) 3 ( 1) 50 < 15) 27 ( 8) 10 ( 3) 30* ( 9) 23 I 7) 63 ( 19) S3 ( 16) 100 ( 30) 87 ( 26) 93 ( 28) 33 ( 10) 73 ( 22) 97 < 29) 50»- MEAN SEC 80 63 0 93 43 53 40 7 73 23 70 83 10 33 47 20 90 3 67 27 17 50 97 13 100 77 30 87 ( 24) ( 19) ( 0) < 28) ( 13) ( 16) ( 12) ( 2) I 22) ( 7) 1 21) ( 25) ( 3) ( 10) ( 14) ( 6) ( 27) I 1) ( 20) ( 8) ( 51 ( 15) ( 29) ( 4) ( 30) ( 23) ( 9) ( 26) MEAN CHLORA 47 63 77 93 20 33 30 87 37 13 50 70 97 73 43 7 67 23 57 27 17 10 53 0 100 90 60 80 1 14) ( 19) I 231 ( 28) < 6) ( 10) ( 9) ( 26) ( 11) ( 41 ( ISI C 21) ( 29) ( 22) < 13) < 2) ( 20) ( 7) ( 17) ( 8) ( 5) ( 3) ( 16) ( 0) 1 30) ( 27) I 18) ( 24) 15- MIN bO 13 63 77 2 42 30 72 57 23 90 53 13 13 67 37 BO 13 83 30 87 72 97 2 100 50 30 42 47 ( 21 ( 19) ( 23) < 0) ( 12) ( 8) 1 21) ( 17) 1 7) « 271 1 It) 1 21 ( 2) ( 201 < 111 ( 24) ( 2) ( 25) ( 8) ( 26) ( 21) < 29) ( 0) < 30) ( 15) ( 8) ( 12) ( It) MEDIAN DISS ORTMO P ; 68 I \ S3 ( ' 92 ( fas « 32 < 1 3 <• 23 ( 42 ( 32 < 92 1 73 1 42 ( 37 1 47 1 13 1 63 1 10 ( 97 ( SO 1 20 < 17 ( 77 ( 7 ( 85 < 57 ( 68 ( 100 ( 20) It) 27) 25) 9) 1) 1 7) 121 »l 271 221 121 ID 14) 41 19) 31 2*1 15) 6) 5) 23) 2) 25) 17) 20) 30) INDEX NO 296 345 225 4S4 347 201 195 241 303 253 422 339 229 2*3 227 1*3 333 139 349 247 212 244 399 210 528 367 330 504 ------- PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES) LAKE CODE LAKE NAME 1764 LAKE VANDAL IA 1765 OLD BEN MINE RESERVOIR 1766 HORSESHOE LAKE MEDIAN TOTAL P 47 ( 0 ( 43 ( 14) 0) 13) MEDIAN INORG N 60 83 57 ( 18) ( 25) ( 17) 500- MEAN SEC 60 ( 57 ( 37 ( 18) 17) 11) MEAN CHLORA 83 40 3 ( 25) ( 12) ( 1) 15- MIN DO 13 60 93 ( 2) ( 18) ( 28) MEDIAN DISS OHTHO P 60 0 80 (.18) ( 0) ( 24) INi)£X NO 323 240 313 ------- LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS. RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO 1 1759 CEDAR LAKE 528 2 1763 BALDWIN LAKE 504 3 1711 COFFEEN LAKE 454 4 1735 RENO LAKE 422 5 1757 EAST LOON LAKE 399 6 1753 LAKE SANGCHRIS 369 7 1761 LAKE WEMATUK 367 8 1712 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 347 9 17*fc LAKE CARLYLE 345 II 1739 LAKE SHELBYVILLE 339 11 1751 LAKE STORY 333 12 1762 RACCOON LAKE 330 13 1764 LAKE VANDAL IA 323 14 1766 HORSESHOE LAKE 313 15 1727 LAKE MARIE 303 16 1703 LAKE BLOOMIN6TON 296 17 1742 LAKE SPRINGFIELD 2B3 18 1733 PISTAKEE LAKE 253 19 1754 LAKE HOLIDAY 247 20 1756 GRASS LAKE 244 21 1726 LAKE LOU YAEGER 241 22 1765 OLD BEN MINE RESERVOIR 240 23 1749 SILVER LAKE (HIGHLAND! 229 24 1748 VERMILION LAKE 227 25 1708 LAKE CHARLESTON 225 26 1755 FOX LAKE 212 27 1758 SLOCUM LAKE 210 28 1714 LAKE DECATUK 201 ------- LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS. RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO 39 1735 LONG LAKE 195 30 1750 WONDER LAKE 183 31 1752 DEPUE LAKE 139 ------- APPENDIX B CONVERSIONS FACTORS ------- CONVERSION FACTORS Hectares x 2.471 « acres Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles Meters x 3.281 = feet Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile ------- APPENDIX C TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA ------- TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR ILLINOIS LAKE CODE 1712 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 520.6 10/23/75 SUB-DRAINAGE TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KM) JAN FEB MAR APR MAY NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS) JON JUL AUG SEP OCT NOW DEC ME AM 1712A1 1712A2 1712B1 1712C1 1712F1 1712ZZ 520.6 213.9 10.3 33.2 4.6 259.0 3.57 1.41 0.06 0.20 0.03 1.86 5.04 2.08 0.10 0.33 0.05 2.49 6.40 2.60 0.12 0.39 0.05 3.23 6.63 2.68 0.12 0.40 0.05 3.37 5.24 2.11 0.10 0.31 0.04 2.68 4.28 1.75 0.08 0.27 0.04 2.13 2.66 1.07 0.05 0.16 0.02 1.37 1.40 0.56 0.02 0.08 0.01 0.73 1.03 0.40 0.02 0.05 0.01 0.56 1.19 0.45 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.67 1.66 0.65 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.89 1.94 0.76 0.03 0.11 0.01 1.03 3.41 1.37 0.0* 0.20 0.03 1.74 TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS) TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR 1712A1 MEAN FLOW DAY 1712A2 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 74 74 74 74 74 2.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.74 9.80 11.07 2.15 11.47 3.37 1.47 1.02 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.03 5.10 5.83 6.74 1.59 4.64 1.33 0.96 3 a 4 2 7 4 2 6 3 2 5 4 3 7 4 2 7 4 2 6 3 2 5 4 520.6 521.1 FLOW DAY 3.79 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.92 0.91 3.51 1.13 2.46 2.46 1.81 0.13 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.34 1.98 0.62 0.48 1.08 0.48 16 17 16 17 SUMMARY TOTAL FLOW IN TOTAL FLOW OUT FLOW DAY FLOW 0.0 12.37 0.27 5.07 41.05 41.05 ------- LAKE CODE 1712 TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR ILLINOIS CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 10/23/75 MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS) TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR 171281 1712C1 1712F1 1712Z2 6 73 7 73 8 73 9 73 10 73 11 73 12 73 1 74 2 74 3 74 4 74 5 74 6 73 7 73 8 73 9 73 10 73 11 73 12 73 1 74 2 74 3 74 4 74 5 74 6 73 7 73 8 73 9 73 10 73 11 73 12 73 1 74 2 74 3 74 4 74 5 74 6 73 7 73 8 73 9 73 10 73 11 73 12 73 1 74 2 74 3 74 4 74 5 74 MEAN FLOW DAY 0.05 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.08 0.22 0.06 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.0 0.01 0.00 0.71 0.82 0.96 0.25 0.68 0.20 0.14 0.02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.03 0.10 0.03 0.02 1.22 0.08 0.00 0.27 0.04 6.23 7.16 B.21 2.61 5.97 1.59 1.16 3 7 4 2 7 4 2 6 3 2 5 4 3 8 4 2 7 4 2 6 3 2 5 4 3 7 4 2 7 4 2 6 3 2 6 4 3 8 4 2 7 4 2 6 3 2 5 4 FLOW DAY 0.09 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.08 0.03 16 0.02 17 0.05 0.02 0.28 0.02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.05 0.28 0.10 16 0.07 17 0.16 0.07 0.04 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.06 0.04 0.01 16 0.01 17 0.02 0.01 2.24 0.16 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.40 2.41 0.76 16 0.68 17 1.30 0.59 FLOW DAY 0.01 0.24 0.04 0.76 0.01 0.10 0.34 6.34 FLOW ------- APPENDIX D PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 171201 37 43 50.0 089 08 30.0 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 17199 ILLINOIS 11EPALES 3 DATE FROM TO 73/05/08 73/08/08 73/10/19 DATE FROM TO 73/05/08 73/08/08 73/10/19 TIME DEPTH OF DAY FEET 13 40 13 40 13 40 13 40 15 40 15 40 15 40 11 10 11 10 11 10 TIME OF DAY 13 40 13 40 13 40 13 40 15 40 15 40 15 40 11 10 11 10 11 10 0000 0004 0015 0020 0000 0005 0019 0000 0005 0014 DEPTH FEET 0000 0004 0015 0020 0000 0005 0019 0000 0005 0014 00010 WATER TEMP CENT 18.4 18.4 18.3 18.2 28.1 28.2 27.1 20.6 20.5 20.4 00665 PHOS-TOT MG/L P 0.076 0.073 0.053 0.081 0.051 0.056 0.051 0.071 0.076 0.094 00300 DO MG/L 8 8 7 2 1 6 5 .3 .1 .8 .6 .2 .4 .6 00077 00094 TRANSP CNDUCTVY SECCHI FIELD INCHES MICROMHO 20 275 270 220 300 30 265 265 265 15 225 223 224 00400 PH SU 8. 8. 8. 8. a. 7. 7. 7. 7. 7. 30 10 10 10 20 80 10 70 60 50 00410 T ALK CAC03 MG/L 39 38 38 39 56 56 60 53 53 54 2111202 0023 FEET 00610 NH3-N TOTAL MG/L 0.080 0.080 0.100 0.110 0.100 0.120 0.320 0.070 0.040 0.070 OOi TOT 1 N MG, 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 a 0 0 32217 CHLRPHYL A UG/L 3 24 29 .4 .6 .4 DEPTH 800 700 700 600 2.100 500 500 700 600 600 00630 N021N03 N-TOTAL MG/L 0.150 0.080 0.060 0.060 0.080 0.070 0.080 0.210 0.200 0.220 00671 PHOS-DIS ORTHO MO/L P 0.013 0.006 0.011 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.015 0.018 0.013 0.014 ------- STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/33 171202 37 43 10.0 089 05 25.0 CRAB ORCHARD LAKE 17199 ILLINOIS DATE FROM TO 73/05/08 73/08/08 73/10/19 TIME DEPTH or DAY FEET 14 10 0000 14 10 0004 14 10 0010 16 10 0000 16 10 0005 16 10 0010 11 30 0000 11 30 0006 00010 WATER TEMP CENT 18.3 18.3 18.3 29.2 29.1 29.0 20.1 19.9 00300 00077 DO TrtANSP CC SECCHI FIELD MG/L INCHES Ml 8.8 8.7 7.8 7.2 8.2 24 28 16 11EPALES 3 2111202 0014 FEET DEPTH 194 :TVY i 'MHO 240 240 240 271 273 272 222 223 00400 PH SU 8.20 8.20 8.20 8.50 8.20 7.90 7.90 7.80 00410 T ALK CAC03 MG/L 37 36 34 54 54 55 51 48 00610 NH3-N TOTAL MG/L 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.090 0.120 0.150 0.040 0.050 00625 TOT KJEL N MG/L 0.700 0.800 0.600 1.800 1.600 1.800 0.800 0.800 00630 N02&N03 N-TOTAL MG/L 0.090 0.100 0.100 0.070 0.120 0.130 0.040 0.040 00671 PHOS-DIS ORTHO MG/L P 0.006 0.008 0.010 0.007 0.010 0.012 0.007 0.022 00665 32217 DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL FROM OF A TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L 73/05/08 14 10 0000 0.082 16.4 14 10 0004 0.082 14 10 0010 0.080 73/08/08 16 10 0000 0.084 70.4 16 10 0005 0.085 16 10 0010 0.087 73/10/19 11 30 0000 0.091 33.1 11 30 0006 0.098 ------- STDHET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 171203 37 41 45.0 089 02 20.0 CrtAd ORCHARD LAKE 17199 ILLINOIS DATE FtfOM TO 73/05/08 73/08/08 73/10/19 TIME DEPTH OF DAY FEET 14 35 0000 14 35 0004 16 25 0000 16 25 0002 11 40 0000 00010 • ATER TEMP CENT 17.9 17.6 30.2 30.3 18.5 00300 00077 00094 00 TftANSP CNDUCTVY SECCHI FIELD MG/L INCHES MICROMHO 8.0 14.0 9.4 5 10 12 290 200 290J 290J 294 11EPALES 3 00400 Pri SO 8.10 8.10 9.00 8.80 8.40 00410 T ALR CAC03 MG/L 38 30 66 65 65 2111202 0006 00610 NH3-N TOTAL MG/L 0.090 0.140 0.170 0.180 0.070 FEET DEPTH 00625 TOT KJEL N MG/L 1.100 0.600 3.300 3.600 1.900 00630 N021NJ03 N- TOTAL MG/L 0.120 0.220 0.180 0.200 0.070 00671 PHOS-DIS ORTHO MG/L P 0.022 0.018 0.115 0.098 0.047 DATE FSOM TO 73/05/08 73/08/08 73/10/19 TINE DEPTH OF OAY FEET 14 35 0000 14 35 0004 16 25 0000 16 25 0002 11 40 0000 00665 PHOS-TOT MG/L P 0.198 0.227 0.424 0.400 0.257 32217 CHLRPHYL A 'JG/L 58.5 225.4 77.6 ------- APPENDIX E TRIBUTARY DATA ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 1712A1 37 43 14.0 089 09 10.0 CRAB ORCHARD CREEK 17135 7.5 CARBONDALE 0/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE ST RD 1901 BRDG BELO DAM AT OUTLET 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DEPTH DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/08 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/11/04 73/12/02 74/01/06 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/05 74/05/04 00630 00625 TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL OF N-TOTAL N DAY FEET 08 09 10 10 08 08 08 09 08 08 11 10 09 08 30 11 30 21 55 25 20 05 45 30 15 50 40 10 MG/L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .067 .250 .220 .230 .357 .260 .680 .232 .192 .060 .028 .046 .038 .024 MG/L 1.760 2.600 1.800 1.200 0.800 0.850 0.700 1.800 0.900 1.400 1.600 1.600 2.300 1.000 00610 00671 00665 NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT TOTAL ORTHO MG/L 0. 0. 420 650 0.294 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 131 090 066 062 116 100 075 145 MG/L P 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 042 046 040 024 020 029 040 0.024 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 030 025 025 030 020 025 MG/L P 0 0 .120 .095 0.190 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .110 .105 .080 .115 .090 .125 .215 .200 .210 .150 .145 ------- STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 1712A2 37 41 48.0 088 59 16.0 CRAB ORCHARD CREEK 17 7.5 MARION I/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE RO BRDG 3 MI SM OF MARION 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/07 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/11/04 73/12/02 74/01/06 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/05 74/05/04 00630 00625 TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL OF N-TOTAL N DAY FEET 10 10 11 13 14 09 09 10 09 09 12 12 10 10 45 45 40 00 35 10 45 15 30 30 15 00 45 00 MG/L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .590 .250 .132 .180 .031 .850 .580 .630 .430 .270 .288 .252 .504 .184 MG/L 2.385 6. 6. 2. 9. 4. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 1. 1. 2. 300 700 300 250 750 600 600 100 800 400 800 700 300 00610 00671 00665 NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT TOTAL ORTHO MG/L 0.660 1.900 1.890 0.860 5.000 2.500 0.410 0.660 0.390 0.445 0.105 0.166 0.530 0.735 MG/L 0. p 310 1.200 0. 1. 4. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 990 800 200 312 200 095 153 065 075 100 095 MG/L P 0 1 1 2 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .590 .250 .100 .100 .100 .200 .600 .670 .345 .460 .800 .410 .330 .400 DEPTH ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 1712B1 37 43 14.0 069 02 00.0 PIGEON CREEK 17 7.5 CRAB ORCHARD T/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE RD BRDG .75 MI WSM OF REFUGE HEADQUARTER 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DEPTH DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/07 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/11/04 73/12/02 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/05 74/05/04 TIME DEPTH OF DAY FEET 10 30 10 24 12 10 12 00 11 55 09 20 10 20 09 45 09 30 11 56 11 20 10 25 09 48 00630 N02&N03 N-TOTAL MG/L 1.100 0.260 0.132 0.078 0.670 0.330 2.600 0.480 1.180 0.276 0.252 0.390 0.500 00625 TOT KJEL N MG/L 3.500 2.810 4.700 2.000 3.800 2.400 1.700 2.200 1.900 1.800 1.500 1.400 1.700 00610 NH3-N TOTAL MG/L 0.830 0.400 0.300 2.100 0.168 0.240 1.100 0.220 0.085 0.085 0.185 0.345 00671 PHOS-DIS ORTHO MG/L P 0*440 0.260 0.285 0.370 1.370 0.410 0*460 0.185 0.660 0.075 0.080 0.125 0.175 00665 PHOS-TOT MG/L P 0.700 0.550 0.540 0.620 1.800 0.760 0.690 0.430 0.980 0.330 0.330 0.345 0.540 ------- STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 1712C1 37 40 40.0 089 01 20.0 WOLF CREEK 17 7.5 CRAB ORCHARD T/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE RD BRDG 7 MI SW OF MARION 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DEPTH DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/08 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/12/02 74/01/06 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/05 74/05/04 00630 00625 TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL OF N-TOTAL N DAY FEET 09 09 11 11 11 09 09 09 09 11 11 10 09 50 48 15 40 45 05 50 15 20 40 35 15 30 MG/L 0 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 .540 .340 .220 .200 .300 .480 .820 .830 .010 .216 .208 .588 .300 MG/L 0. 2. 900 700 1.050 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 0. 0. 470 400 300 700 200 400 200 200 900 600 00610 00671 00665 NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT TOTAL ORTHO MG/L 0. 054 0.061 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 168 105 068 136 065 065 045 050 095 120 MG/L P 0.026 0.010 0.032 0.027 0.021 0.020 0.024 0.015 0.010 0.030 0.035 0.005 0.020 MG/L P 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 060 060 095 070 105 045 035 035 035 280 260 020 060 ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 171201 39 39 15.0 089 05 05.0 GRASSY CREEK 17 7.5 CRAB ORCHARD T/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE BRDG 1. MI E OF COTTAGE HOME CHURCH 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DEPTH DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/07 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/11/0* 73/12/02 74/01/06 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/05 74/05/04 00630 00625 TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL OF N-TOTAL N DAY FEET MG/L MG/L 09 29 0.016 1.980 10 11 11 09 08 08 09 09 08 11 11 10 09 03 00 30 15 50 55 30 15 55 22 20 00 15 4.600 0 .016 0.035 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .046 .020 .040 .108 .176 .192 .148 .136 .136 .092 2. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 700 320 400 225 400 800 700 300 750 600 0.700 0. 500 00610 00671 00665 NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT TOTAL ORTHO MG/L MG/L P MG/L P 0.013 0.035 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 460 086 058 110 044 028 096 065 025 020 030 072 050 0.009 0.010 0.014 0.022 0.033 0.008 0.008 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.005 0.010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .045 .060 .110 .080 .065 .025 .020 .025 0.030 0 0 0 0 .050 .040 .020 .030 ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 1712E1 37 40 35.0 089 05 58.0 LITTLE GRASSY CREEK 17 7.5 CRAB ORCHARD T/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE RO BRUG BELO CONFLU WITH LOST BRANCH 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DEPTH DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/08 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/11/04 73/12/02 74/01/06 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/05 74/05/04 00630 00625 TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL OF N-TOTAL N DAY FEET 09 09 10 10 09 08 08 09 09 08 11 11 09 08 00 32 45 45 05 35 45 15 00 25 05 00 55 50 MG/L 0 0 0 0 .033 .069 .038 .037 0.058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .012 .100 .192 .184 .160 .156 .144 .128 .108 MG/L 1.100 4.500 2.310 0.890 1.100 0.800 0.300 1.400 0.600 0.300 1.200 0.700 0.400 0.400 00610 00671 00665 NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT TOTAL ORTHO MG/L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • • • • • • • • • * • • 032 147 053 060 068 044 056 056 040 030 030 040 045 050 MG/L P 0.012 0.014 0.011 0.015 0.021 0.033 0.012 0.008 0.010 0*010 0.020 0.020 0.010 0.010 MG/L P 0 0 0 0 .055 .060 .100 .105 0.080 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .085 .030 .020 .027 .040 .115 .110 .010 .040 ------- STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/23 1712F1 37 44 50.0 089 05 05.0 PIN OAK CREEK 17 7.5 CRAB ORCHARD T/CRAB ORCHARD LAKE HMY 13 BRDG .5 HI WSW OF CARTERVILLE 11EPALES 2111204 4 0000 FEET DEPTH DATE FROM TO 73/06/03 73/07/07 73/08/04 73/09/02 73/10/07 73/11/04 73/12/02 74/02/03 74/02/16 74/03/02 74/03/17 74/04/06 74/05/04 TIME DEPTH OF DAY FEET 11 13 11 40 12 25 12 15 12 10 09 40 10 30 10 45 09 55 12 45 12 20 15 00 10 40 00630 N02&N03 N-TOTAL MG/L 0.294 0.086 0.930 0.063 0.120 0.540 0.116 0.860 0.440 0.380 0.360 0.240 0.690 00625 TOT KJEL N MG/L 7.800 10.000 15.000 12.600 27.000 16.000 3.850 4.400 6.000 2.100 2.200 1.900 4.300 00610 NH3-N TOTAL MG/L 0.720 2.400 2.900 6.850 17.000 9.300 1.800 0.970 2.200 0.315 0.320 0.200 1.350 00671 PHOS-DIS ORTHO MG/L P 0.690 1.100 1.000 4.200 14.000 1.200 1.250 1.500 0.308 0.330 0.340 1.000 00665 PHOS-TOT MG/L P 1.200 1.800 1.100 5.000 14.000 10.500 1.720 2.400 2.300 0.790 0.840 0.500 2.630 ------- |