EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                        Environmental Monitoring
                        Systems Laboratory
                        P.O. Box 93478
                        Las Vegas NV 89193-3478
EPA 600/R-92/076
April 1992
Research and Development
Strontium in Water
Intercomparison Study

A Statistical Evaluation of the
January 17,1992 Data
                                  5168GR92NRD-5

-------
            Strontium in Water
          Intercomparison Study
            January 17, 1992
      Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            Las Vegas, Nevada

-------
            UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
               ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY-LAS VEGAS
                                  P.O. BOX 93478
                            LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-3478
                                   (702/798-2100)
Dear Participant,

   Enclosed are the results of the Nuclear Radiation Assessment Division (EMSL-LV)
Intercomparison Study for Strontium in Water; January 17, 1992.

   Please take a few minutes to review this report and the analytical data your
laboratory submitted to us.  If there are any apparent  discrepancies, please notify
us immediately.

   We encourage you to make use of the computer-automated data-entry system that
has been in place for some time now.  As the number of participants increases, and
it becomes unrealistic for us to receive results by mail or FAX, the computer system
will be our only avenue for accepting data.

   If you have any questions or comments, please send a message via the data-entry
system or contact Frank Novielli at 702/798-2159 or Patricia Honsa at 702/798-2141 .
                                          Sincerely,
                                          Frank Novielli
                                          Senior Chemist
                                          Radioanalysis Branch
Enclosure

-------
                 NOTICE

This material has been funded wholly by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
It has been subject to the Agency's review,
and it has been approved for publication
as an EPA document.

-------
          EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study: Strontium in Water, 17-Jan-1992       1/11


   The following pages consist of separate sections for each of the nuclides in this study with four
parts per section.  After the first, each part is separated from the next by a new page or a thick
horizontal bar.  The first page of each section is a statistical summary for the nuclide and starts
with a statement of the known value, the control limits, and the warning limits.

   The warning limits are placed at two normalized standard deviations above and below the
known value and the control limits are three normalized standard deviations above and below
the known value.  If you keep control charts, these values will be useful for anticipating problems
with the accuracy of your analytical methods.
   The coin shaped pie chart at the top of the summary page shows the fate of all the samples
sent out in number and percentage terms.  The pie chart starts at the top and rotates clockwise.
The first sector represents those participants who submitted analytical results within both the
warning and control limits. The next sector represents those who are in the warning region but
not out of control. The third sector represents those who are out of control, but have passed the
the outlier test. The fourth sector represents those who have failed the outlier test. The last
sector represents those participants who have failed to respond properly. This is the case if no
analytical results were returned, or less than three determinations were reported, or if the results
were received too late.  The reeding on the edge of the coin is spaced at one percent intervals,  and
the sector shading becomes darker as the data reliability decreases. Sectors with zero width are
not shown.
   The table in the center shows a number of statistical quantities calculated from the submitted
data based on the mean and median values in relation to the known value, both before and after
outlier removal. The lower pie chart uses the same construction as the upper chart and shows
the distribution of properly submitted data in terms of deviation from the known value divided
into sectors representing one, two, three, and greater than three normalized standard deviations.

   The second part is  an alphabetical listing, in lab-code order, of submitted data and several
calculated quantities.  An entry that is shaded has been rejected because of one of the reasons
listed above or failure  of the outlier test. The fifth and sixth columns are a measure of laboratory
precision.  The Range  analysis is a normalized value that you may use to keep precision control
charts. If this value is between 2.0 and 3.0, your analytical process precision is in the warning
zone; if it  exceeds 3.0 it is out of control. The eighth and ninth columns are the differences from
the mean  of all non-outliers and from the known value, respectively. A tag symbol may appear in
the last column. Each page with tags has a symbol definition summary at the bottom.  If there is
no tag symbol, the  data is within the control limits, but it may be in the warning zone.

   The third part is a three-column listing of result average, tag symbol, and lab-code in average
order excluding those labs not responding properly. In this order, all outliers and out-of-control
results appear at the top or bottom of the list.
   The last part is two bar chart displays showing frequency distributions of responding
participants. The first chart places the known value at the center and a bar at each 0.2 unit of
expected precision.  The second chart places the mean of the reported measurements at the center
and a bar at each 0.2 unit of standard deviation. In both cases,  a bar includes those results within
0.1 unit up to the maximum of six. Any results more than six units from the center value are
shown'cumulatively by a shaded bar one past the sixth unit. If the central tendency of the known
value distribution falls away from the center, an error in accuracy is indicated. If the distribution
is broad, poor precision is indicated. The mean value distribution is similar but uses the average
and standard deviation of reported results  as its basis.

-------
            EMSL-LV Intercomparison Study: Strontium in Water,  17-Jan-1992
                                2/11
Strontium-89                        Statistical Summary                       108 Participants
The known value of this nuclide is 51.0 pCi/1 with an expected precision of 5.0; the control limits
are 42.3 to 59.7; the warning regions are 42.3 to 45.2 and 56.8 to 59.7
25(23.1 %) Failed to respond -.
2(1.9%) Outliers '
19(17.6 %) Out of control
       but not an outlier

         Statistic
            . 5O(46.3 %) Within all limits
                                                     Respondents
          -•12(11.1 %) In warning zone
                      but within control

                         Non-outliers
Mean
Std. Dev.
Variance
%Coef. ofVar.
% deviation of mean from known value
Norm. dev. of mean from known value
Median
% deviation of median from known value
Norm. dev. of median from known value
50.79
29.79
887.62
58.66
-0.42
-0.01
48.33
-5.23
-0.09
Grand Avg 47.12
10.55
111.39
22.40
-7.60
-0.37
48.00
-5.88
-0.28
22(26.5 %) More than 3 norm. S.D..
11(13.3 %) Between 2 and 3 norm. S.D.%
                                                   • '    •:.-.  .•
                                                  •
                                                   , .   >: ".    : ;
        , 23(27.7 %) Within 1 norm. S.D.
        "                of known value
'• 27(32.5 %) Between 1 and 2 norm. S.D.

-------
3/11 EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study:
[ Strontium-89
Lab Res. 1
A
AB
AE
AF
AI
AJ
AK
AL
AU
AW
AT
AZ
BB
BC
BO
BH
BL
BM
BO
C
CA
CE
CJ
CK
CO
CQ
._..
cx
D
DD
DE
DG
DO
DT
i DZ
E
EB
EH
EL
FE
1 Fr*
FU
HK
[ Mtr
i
• =
0 =
53.0
52.0
58.0
50.0
49.0
45.0
39.0
52.0
54.0
•'



46.0

52.0
46.0
47.0
47.0
51.0
44.0

46.0
75.0
42.0
49.0
67.0
. 46.0
50.0
45.0
54.0
52.0
46.0
43.0
55.0
43.0
46.0
58.0

51.0
45.0

46.0
Res. 2
53.0
52.0
55.0
51.0
47.0
53.0
45.0
56.0
58.0
_,



47.0

54.0
44.0
41.0
47.0
50.0
45.0

47.0
69.0
49.0
48.0
60.0
42.0
48.0
45.0
56.0
55.0
49.0
43.0
57.0
48.0
48.0
55.0

52.0
46.0
""
48.0
Res. 3
52.0
56.0
66.0
50.0
46.0
37.0
42.0
52.0
60.0
,

•*
'
47.0
f f
57.0
47.0
48.0
43.0
49.0
39.0

44.0
73.0
48.0
49.0
61.0
45.0
53.0
46.0
53.0
52.0
48.0
46.6
58.0
42.0
44.0
55.0

52.0
47.0

45.0
No data submitted
Insufficient
data
x =
Exper.
Sigma
0.58
2.31
5.69
0.58
1.53
8.00
3.00
2.31
3.06


'
'
0.58
f
2.52
1.53
3.79
2.31
1.00
3.21

1.53
3.06
3.79
0.58
3.79
2.08
2.52
0.58
1.53
1.73
1.53
1.73
1.53
3.21
2.00
1.73

0.58
1.00

1.53
Strontium in Water, 17-Jan-1992

Rng anal Normalized deviation
(R + SR) Average (grand-avg) (known) Tag
0.118
0.473
1.570
0.118
0.354
2.695
0.709
0.473
0.709
•'

f
f
0.118
-
0.591
0.354
0.827
0.473
0.236
0.709

0.354
0.709
0.827
0.118
0.827
0.473
0.591
0.118
0.354
0.354
0.354
0.354
0.354
0.709
0.473
0.354

0.118
0.236

0.354
52.67
53.33
59.67
50.33
47.33
45.00
42.00
53.33
57.33
f f f
^
f
,.
46.67
, '-
54.33
45.67
45.33
45.67
50.00
42.67
,
45.67
72.33
46.33
48.67
62.67
44.33
50.33
45.33
54.33
53.00
47.67
44.00
56.67
44.33
46.00
56.00

51.67
46.00

46.33
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier
1.92
2.15
4.35
1.11
0.07
-0.74
-1.77
2.15
3.54
•'

f

-0.16

2.50
-0.50
-0.62
-0.50
1.00
-1.54

-0.50
8.73
-0.27
0.53
5.38
-0.97
1.11
-0.62
2.50
2.04
0.19
-1.08
3.31
-0.97
-0.39
3.07

1.57
-0.39

-0.27
IT s Above
II 3 Below
0.58
0.81
3.00 .
-0.23
-1.27
-2.08
-3.12 Jl
0.81
2.19
» *
«
»
«
-1.50
»
1.16
-1.85
-1.96
-1.85
-0.35
-2.89
»
-1.85
7.39 tT
-1.62
-0.81
*
4.04 ft
-2.31
-0.23
-1.96
1.15
0.69
-1.15
* :
-2.42
1.96
-2.31
-1.73
1.73
»
0.23
-1.73
»
-1.62
control limit
control limit

-------
EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study:
Strontium-89
Lab Res. 1
-kr
j
JG
JS
JY
K
KL
KX
L
JUWI
LS
LT
M
ME
MQ
MS
N
NI
NJ
NT
OA
OL
PB
PC
PT
PV
9
QK
QL
QM
QQ
QU
QW
QX
QZ
R
EC
RK
*»*•'
JclL*
RM
'""," '"f^' ";
52.0
14.0
32.0
39.0
50.0
59.0
56.0
52.0
' ••
50.0
39.0
54.0
49.0
49.0
50.0
41.0
51.0
38.0
57.0
46.0
55.0
44.0
•V
* f f
67.0
21.0
46.0
65.0
39.0
75.0
50.0
'"''-;
55.0
49.0
29.0
44.0
39.0

33.0
" ' ',
53.0
Res. 2
'" ' '', ,, '
'- <- *',"/>,;
49.0
14.0
26.0
37.0
52.0
' '
63.0
59.0
55.0
.•
•
50.0
40.0
47.0
40.0
48.0
45.0
43.0
47.0
37.0
57.0
48.0
55.0
42.0

53.0
23.0
47.0
41.0
74.0
53.0

51.0
50.0
27.0
44.0
11.0

33.0
. '
54.0
Res. 3
£ * > •"'
ff •"'.,•'
50.0
18.0
20.0
19.0
54.0
* -fff
54.0
53.0
52.0
'
50.0
38.0
44.0
51.0
49.0
49.0
44.0
42.0
36.0
61.0
46.0
53.0
43.0
&<>, '"''
63.0
27.0
49.0
JN&O/-
44.0
80.0
55.0
50.0
51.0
24.0
45.0
31.0
'
40.0
-
56.0
• s No data submitted
0 3
Insufficient
data
x =
Exper.
Sigma
', , ' s
1.53
2.31
e:oo
11.02
2.00
'
4.51
3.00
1.73

0.00
1.00
5.13
5.86
0.58
2.65
1.53
4.51
1.00
2.31
1.15
1.15
1.00
X-
7.21
3.06
1.53
2.52
3.21
2.52.
2.65
1.00
2.52
0.58
14.42

4.04

1.53
Strontium in Water, 17-Jan-1992
Rng anal
(R + SR) Average
.• " ''"' '//
0.354
0.473
1.795
3.596
0.473

1.120
0.709
0.354

0.000
0.236
1.345
1.570
0.118
0.591
0.354
1.120
0.236
0.473
0.236
0.236
0.236
2.245
0.709
0.354
0.591
0.709
0.591
0.591
0.236
0.591
0.118
5.396

0.827

0.354
",• ,y • •; • •• • yy.
50.33
15.33
26.00
31.67
52.00
..
58.67
56.00
53.00
,
50.00
39.00
48.33
46.67
48.67
48.00
42.67
46.67
37.00
58.33
46.67
54.33
43.00
61.00
23.67
47.33
-'- .10&33
41.33
76.33
52.67
52.00
50.00
26.67
44.33
27.00

35.33

54.33
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier
4/11
Normalized deviation
(grand-avg) (known) Tag
' ' ' 'f ' 	
1.11
' ' ' 4
" *
-0.23
-11.01 -12.36 U
-7.32
-5.35
1.69
'
4.00
3.07
2.04
*
1.00
-2.81
0.42
-0.16
0.53
0.30
-1.54
-0.16
-3.51
3.88
-0.16
2.50
-1.43
4.81
-8.13
0.07
-2.01
10.12
1.92
1.69
1.00
-7.09
-0.97
-6.97

-4.08
<
2.50
IT = Above
•11 & Below
-8.66 U
-6.70 U
0.35
*
2.66
1.73
0.69
*
-0.35
-4.16 Ji
-0.92
-1.50
-0.81
-1.04
-2.89
-1.50
-4.85 U
2.54
-1.50
1.15
-2.77
3.46 "ft"
-9.47 U
-1.27
I'M* x
-3.35 li
8.78 ft
0.58
*
0.35
-0.35
-8.43 li
-2.31
-8.31 U.
»
-5.43 U
*
1.15
control limit
control limit

-------
5/11 EMSL-LV Intercomparison Study:
Strontium-89
Lab Res. 1 Res. 2
RN 49.0 48.0
RR 49.0 49.0
as
KU 29$.£ 395.0
S 49.0 50.0
SC 59.0 53.0
SD
SI 24.0 25.0
SK
SM
SS 51.0 51.0
ST 21.0 25.0
T 48.0 49.0
U 22.0 20.0
W 39.0 36.0
Y 57.0 54.0
Z 52.0 53.0

Exper.
Res. 3 Sigma
47.0 1.00
51.0 1.15
/
j&9&$ L7&
52.0 1.53
58.0 3.21
,
24.0 0.58
*" ,
t
51.0 0.00
25.0 2.31
49.0 0.58
18.0 2.00
40.0 2.08
58.0 2.08
53.0 0.58
Strontium in Water, 17-Jan-1992

Rng anal Normalized deviation
(R + SR) Average (grand-avg) (known)
0.236 48.00 0.30 -1.04
0.236 49.67 0.~88 -0.46
••, ••
rf\ XMSt^i. *9H^Z. -fti^ fljft O*^ J&^tf ttT
V^VV1?* tfy^/j"" JjH?*-^-*. O^»O r
0.354 50.33 1.11 -0.23
0.709 56.67 3.31 1.96

0.118 24.33 -7.89 -9.24

-
0.000 51.00 1.34 0.00
0.473 23.67 -8.13 -9.47
0.118 48.67 0.53 -0.81
0.473 20.00 -9.40 -10.74
0.473 38.33 -3.04 -4.39
0.473 56.33 3.19 1.85
0.118 52.67 1.92 0.58


Tag


«
X


' * !
J
* i
*

u

u.
u


Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Average Tag
15.33 Jl
20.00 U
23.67 II
23.67 U
24.33 U
26.00 U
26.67 U
27.00 II
31.67 U
35.33 4
37.00 U
38.33 11
39.00 &
41.33 11
42.00 4
42.67
42.67
43.00
44.00
44.33
44.33
44.33
45.00
45.33
* s No data submitted
0 = Insufficient data
Lab
JG
U
ST
PV
SI
JS
QX
R
JY
RK
NT
W
M
QK
AK
NI
CA
PC
E
QZ
EH
D
AJ
DE
Average
45.33
45.67
45.67
45.67
46.00
46.00
46.33
46.33
46.67
46.67
46.67
46.67
47.33
47.33
47.67
48.00
48.00
48.33
48.67
48.67
48.67
49.67
50.00
50.00
Tag Lab
BM
CJ
BO
BL
HK
EL
I
-CO
OL
NJ
MQ
BC
Q
AI
DT
RN
N
ME
T
MS
CQ
RR
QW
LT
Average Tag
50.00
50.33
50.33
50.33
50.33
51.00
51.67
52.00
52.00
52.67
52.67
52.67
53.00
53.00
53.33
53.33
54.33
54.33
54.33
54.33
56.00
56.00
56.33
56.67
TAG SYMBOLS ft s Above control
x a Determined to be an outlier U- s Below control
Lab
C
S
J
DD
AF
SS
FU
QU
K
Z
QM
A
L
DO
AL
AB
RM
PB
DG
BH
KX
FE
Y
SC
limit
limit

-------
           EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study: Strontium in Water,  17-Jan-1992
                                                                         6/11
Strontiuxn-89
Average	Tag
                Data sorted by Laboratory Average
              Lab  | Average	Tag	Lab | Average
                                                                         Tag
                                       Lab
  56.67
  57.33
  58.33
              EB
              AU
              OA
                               58.67
                               59.67
                               61.00
                               62.67
tr
tr
KL
AE
PT
CX
 72.33
 76.33
102.33
296.00
tr
IT
X
X
                                        CK
                                        QL
                                                                                      RU
 %
 10
-  Frequency distribution of responding labs(expected prec. vs known value)
     -*
           exp. prec.  "2
                                           known
                                           value
                                                              exp. prec.
                Frequency distribution of responding labs(std. dev. vs mean value)
 10
OJBT
                                              .ii-Tl-i f
                      std. dev.
                                           mean
                                           value
                                               +2  std. dev.
• s No data submitted
0 = Insufficient data
                          TAG SYMBOLS
                    x s Determined to be an outlier
                                                                  tt = Above control limit
                                                                  •11 s Below control limit

-------
            EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study: Strontium in Water,  17-Jan-1992
                                   7/11
Strontium-90                        Statistical Summary                       108 Participants
The known value of this nuelide is 20.0 pCi/1 with an expected precision of 5.0; the control limits
are 11.3 to 28.7; the warning regions are 11.3 to 14.2 and 25.8 to 28.7
21(19.4 %) Failed to respond
4(3.7 %) Outliers •
         Statistic
                 79(73.1 %) Within all limits
Respondents
4(3.7 %) In warning zone
       but within control


          Non-outliers
Mean
Std. Dev.
Variance
% Coef. of Var.
% deviation of mean from known value
Norm. dev. of mean from known value
Median
% deviation of median from known value
Norm. dev. of median from known value
     23.73
     35.50
   1260.55
    149.63
     18.64
      0.11
     19.00
     -5.00
     -0.03
Grand Avg 19.28
             2.46
             6.04
            12.74
            -3.59
            -0.29
            19.00
            -5.00
            -0.41
4(4.6 %) More than 3 norm. S.D. »„,
4(4.6 %) Between 2 and 3 norm. S.D. •
            .62(71.3 %) Within 1 norm. S.D.
                           of known value
     17(19.5 %) Between 1 and 2 norm. S.D.

-------
8/11 EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study:
Strontium-90
Lab Res. 1
A
AB
AE
AF
AI
AJ
AK
AL
AU
AW
AY
AZ
BB
BC
BG
BH
BL
BM
BO
C
CA
CE
CJ
CK
CO
CQ
€8
CX
D
DD
DE
DG
DO
DT
BZ
E
EB
EH
EL
FE
If*
FU
HK
mi
I
• =
0 a
19.0
17.0
15.0
18.0
18.0
20.0
21.0
21.0
22.0

18.0

19.0
20.0
19.0
19.0
22.0
22.0
16.0
19.0
18.0

19.0
22.0
20.0
16.0
24.0
20.0
20.0
22.0
18.0
21.0
16.0
'
19.0
18.0
20.0
16.0
22.0

18.0
17.0

26.0
Res. 2 Res. 3
19.0
18.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
15.0
21.0
21.0
23.0

17.0
f f
20.0
19.0
19.0
18.0
21.0
24.0
16.0
20.0
17.0
.• .•
20.0
22.0
15.0
18.0
16.0
21.0
19.0
22.0
17.0
19.0
17.0
' / ' ' "'.
19.0
18.0
20.0
15.0
21.0

19.0
17.0

26.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
18.0
19.0
13.0
18.0
18.0
24.0
, '
18.0
...
21.0
20.0
20.0
19.0
21.0
23.0
17.0
19.0
20.0
, ,
17.0
19.0
17.0
18.0
15.0
20.0
20.0
22.0
16.0
21.0
18.0

18.0
19.0
21.0
18.0
21.0

20.0
17.0
-
29.0
No data submitted
Insufficient
data
X S
Exper.
Sigma
0.00
1.00
2.00
0.00
0.58
3.61
1.73
1.73
1.00

0.58

1.00
0.58
0.58
0.58
0.58
1.00
0.58
0.58
1.53
•• f j
1.53
1.73
2.52
1.15
4.93
0.58
0.58
0.00
1.00
1.15
1.00
•*
0.58
0.58
0.58
1.53
0.58

1.00
0.00

1.73
Strontium in Water,
Rnganal
(R + SR) Average
0.000
0.236
0.473
0.000
0.118
0.827
0.354
0.354
0.236
'
0.118
'
0.236
0.118
0.118
0.118
0.118
0.236
0.118
0.118
0.354

0.354
0.354
0.591
0.236
1.120
0.118
0.118
0.000
0.236
0.236
0.236

0.118
0.118
6.118
0.354
0.118

0.236
0.000

0.354
19.00
18.00
17.00
18.00
18.67
16.00
20.00
20.00
23.00

17.67

20.00
19.67
19.33
18.67
21.33
23.00
16.33
19.33
18.33

18.67
21.00
17.33
17.33
18.33
20.33
19.67
22.00
17.00
20.33
17.00

18.67
18.33
20.33
16.33
21.33

19.00
17.00
'
27.00
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier
17-Jan-1992

Normalized deviation
(grand-avg) (known) Tag
-0.10
-0.44
-0.79
-0.44
-0.21
-1.14
0.25
0.25
1.29

-0.56
.•
0.25
0.13
0.02
-0.21
0.71
1.29
-1.02
0.02
-0.33

-0.21
0.60
-0.67
-0.67
-0.33
0.36
0.13
0.94
-0.79
0.36
-0.79

-0.21
-0.33
0.36
-1.02
0.71

-0.10
-0.79

2.67
ft s Above
& s Below
-0.35
-0.69
-1.04
-0.69
-0.46
-1.39
0.00
0.00
1.04
* ;
-0.81
»
0.00
-0.12
-0.23
-0.46
0.46
1.04
-1.27
-0.23
-0.58
»
-0.46
0.35
-0.92
-0.92
-0.58
0.12
-0.12
0.69
-1.04
0.12
-1.04
* :
-0.46
-0.58
0.12
-1.27
0.46
*
-0.35
-1.04
»
2.42
control limit
control limit

-------
EMSL-LV Intercomparison Study:
Strontium in Water,
17-Jan-1992
9/11
Strontium-90

Lab
ISUL'-
id''
j
JG
JS
JY
K
KH
KL
KX
L
LM
LS
LT
M
ME
MQ
MS
N
NI
NJ
NT
OA
OL
PB
PC
FP
P<$
PT
PV
Q
QJ
OK
QL
QM
QQ
QU
QW
QX
QZ
R
BC
RK
RL
RM
• =
0 s

Res. 1
^f'^'4;':
' , '? /"",'"',/
19.0
25.0
13.0
18.0
17.0
19.0
20.0
19.0
17.0
f
s ' -
16.0
18.0
18.0
16.0
19.0
16.0
18.0
26.0
15.0
17.0
17.0
19.0
22.0
;
' '
16.0
24.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
24.0
23.0
~, '
17.0
20.0
£M>
14.0
21.0

23.0

18.0

Res. 2
*"'•&'"%?,*'
" * ' ',
19.0
23.0
12.0
16.0
17.0
19.0
24.0
21.0
18.0
/ ', '.'-'
ff •>'':•
16.0
18.0
21.0
23.0
17.0
20.0
17.0
26.0
19.0
17.0
20.0
21.0
20.0
'
,*
16.0
25.0
19.0
22.0
18.0
21.0
21.0
f'
20.0
20.0
$8,0
14.0
29.0

24.0
f
17.0

Res. 3
W/^^%^/1
/ , , ' ' <';* ^
19.0
20.0
13.0
24.0
18.0
19.0
22.0
19.0
18.0
,/' '" ', /'
' *'<}'*"'<
16.0
19.0
23.0
19.0
17.0
18.0
14.0
27.0
17.0
19.0
17.0
20.0
21.0
f j f
,$ <• ,f
f ff , % '
15.0
26.0
20.0
20.0
17.0
21.0
21.0
, ' /
20.0
19.0
66,0
14.0
23.0

23.0

17.0
No data submitted
Insufficient
data
x =
Exper.
Sigma
^r;/;"J"^
''' ''', '/, " '''
0.00
2.52
0.58
4.16
0.58
0.00
2.00
1.16
0.58
A f« f
fs _.
0.00
0.58
2.52
3.51
1.15
2.00
2.08
0.58
2.00
1.15
1.73
1.00
1.00
'
'
0.58
1.00
1.00
1.53
1.53
1.73
1.15
' '
1.73
0.58
7.77
0.00
4.16

0.58
••
0.58
Rng anal
(R + SR)
'*%*£%$/£
"' ' '/','/' i'' * '' f
0.000
0.591
0.118
0.945
0.118
0.000
0.473
0.236
0.118
', , / ','
"', ' i ' s
0.000
0.118
0.591
0.827
0.236
0.473
0.473
0.118
0.473
0.236
0.354
0.236
0.236
*""" s
- f /
0.118
0.236
0.236
0.354
0.354
0.354
0.236

0.354
0.118
2.470
0.000
0.945

0.118
'
0.118
Normalized deviation
Average
'&*'.'',*$%'*'£
' ' - ' y'& ','
19.00
22.67
12.67
19.33
17.33
19.00
22.00
19.67
17.67
f f f
f f s f
16.00
18.33
20.67
19.33
17.67
18.00
16.33
26.33
17.00
17.67
18.00
20.00
21.00
'
"'
15.67
25.00
19.00
20.33
18.33
22.00
21.67
,
19.00
19.67
§7.33
14.00
24.33

23.33

17.33
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an outlier
(grand-avg) (known) Tag
^f^P't"''"-;^'
Jx"'/,* !**r',' '
-0.10
1.17
-2.29
0.02
-0.67
-0.10
0.94
0.13
-0.56
« / t '
'< ' />-'
-1.14
-0.33
0.48
0.02
-0.56
-0.44
-1.02
2.44
-0.79
-0.56
-0.44
0.25
0.60
•*
f
-1.25
1.98
-0.10
0.36
-0.33
0.94
0.83

-0.10
0.13
13.18
-1.83
1.75

1.40
s
-0.67
H s Above
•li s Below
;^'"f,,' Vt*"
', *
-0.35
0,92
-2.54
-0.23
-0.92
-0.35
0.69
-0.12
-0.81
, •
*
-1.39
-0.58
0.23
-0.23
-0.81
-0.69
-1.27
2.19
-1.04
-0.81
-0.69
0.00
0.35
0- *
* ,
-1.50
1.73
-0.35
0.12
-0.58
0.69
0.58
*
-0.35
-0.12
12.93 x
-2.08
1.50
,
1.15
9
-0.92
control limit
control limit

-------
10/11
EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study:
Strontium
in Water, 17-Jan-1992

Strontium-90
Lab
RN
RR
ns
w&
8
sc
SD
BW -
SI
SK
SM
ss
$T
T
II
W
Y
Z
Res. 1 Res. 2
18.0 21.0
17.0 19.0

348J0 342$
20.0 20.0
19.0 19.0
f
"'
24.0 23.0
'
^ '
19.0 21.0
i&O &<*
18.0 18.0
40.0 .- 49,0
19.0 18.0
18.0 18.0
20.0 19.0
Exper.
Res. 3 Sigma
19.0 1.53
19.0 1.15
;-" ~,
850$ ' 4J&
21.0 0.58
20.0 0.58
'
-', --•• , - *" r ' :
23.0 0.58
' ' • / ' • . , / .
' /' ' ' ,
21.0 1.15
10.0 , ; W$
18.0 0.00
54.0 404
18.0 0.58
18.0 0.00
19.0 0.58
Rnganal
(R + SR)
0.354
0.236
' ' -
0*040
0.118
0.118

'
0.118
, ''
'
0.236
^0«a§4
0.000
0.94S
0.118
0.000
0.118
Normalized deviation
Average (grand-avg) (known)
19.33 0.02 -0.23
18.33 -0.33 -0.58
- ' '
' 34&$7 ' 110*41 - ' 13B46
20.33 0.36 0.12
19.33 0.02 -0.23

'
23.33 1.40 1.15
- -
.. .. •• ' '*,
20.33 0.36 0.12
i0Ja -^10 &M
18.00 -0.44 -0.69
49.67 10,63 lO^S
18.33 -0.33 -0.58
18.00 -0.44 -0.69
19.33 0.02 -0.23
Tag


«
X


» :
*

»
«

X

x ;



Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Average
10.33
12.67
14.00
15.67
16.00
16.00
16.33
16.33
16.33
17.00
17.00
17.00
17.00
17.00
17.33
17.33
17.33
17.33
17.67
17.67
17.67
17.67
18.00
18.00
Tag
X




















•


• = No data submitted
0 s Insufficient data
Lab
ST
JS
QZ
PT
LT
AJ
NI
EL
BO
NT
HK
DT
DG
AE
RM
K
CQ
CO
OA
MS
L
AY
Y
T
Average Tag Lab
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.33
18.33
18.33
18.33
18.33
18.33
18.33
18.67
18.67
18.67
18.67
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
19.33
19.33
19.33
























TAG SYMBOLS
x s Determined
OL
N
AF
AB
W
RR
QK
M
EB
CX
CA
E
CJ
BH
AI
QU
Q
KH
J
FU
A
Z
SC
RN
Average Tag
19.33
19.33
19.33
19.33
19.67
19.67
19.67
19.67
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.33
20.33
20.33
20.33
20.33
20.33
20.67
21.00
21.00
21.33
21.33
21.67
1T s Above control
to be an outlier U = Below control
Lab
MQ
JY
C
BG
QW
KX
DD
BC
PB
BB
AL
AK
SS
S
QJ
EH
DO
D
ME
PC
CK
FE
BL
QM
limit
limit

-------
EMSL-LV Intel-comparison Study: Strontium in Water, 17-Jan-1992 11/11
Strontium-90
Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Average Tag Lab Average Tag Lab Average Tag Lab
22.00 QL 23.00
22.00 KL 23.33
22.00 DE 23.33
22.67 JG 24.33
23.00 BM 25.00
/
AU 26.33 NJ
SI 27.00 I
RK 49.67 x U
R 57.33 x QX
PV 346.67 x RU
% Frequency distribution of responding labs(expected prec. vs known value)

in. - - __• -1
- - 1.
- - T -M11
L. 	
111 _____________ .
Illllll i. 	 i
'* '4 exp. prec. -2 known exp. prec. +« +*
value
% Frequency distribution of responding labs(std. dev. vs mean value)


10 j
o " " " T - - "I-'
•'* ' -'4 std. 'dev. -2
• j
II ill
HlllLiii-i __ -_. i
meln * std/dev- * ' +*
value
• 3 No data submitted TAG SYMBOLS ft = Above control limit
0 s Insufficient data x = Determined to be an outlier II s Below control limit

-------