U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
OLIN LAKE
LAGRANGE COUNTY
INDIANA
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 338
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
OLINLAKE
LAGRANGE COUNTY
INDIANA
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 538
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
AND THE
INDIANA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1976
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Indiana Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 12
VI. Appendices 13
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
' can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning {§303(e)>, water
quality criteria/standards review {§303(c)>, clean lakes {§314(a,b)>,
and water quality monitoring {§106 and §305(b)} activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Indiana State Board of
Health for professional involvement, to the Indiana National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Indiana wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Pollution Control, Indiana
State Board of Health, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Alfred F. Ahner, Adjutant General of Indiana,
and Project Officers Lt. Colonel Charles B. Roberts (Retired)
and Colonel Robert L. Sharp, who directed the volunteer efforts
of the Indiana National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF INDIANA
LAKE NAME
Bass
Cataract
Crooked
Dallas
Geist
Hami1 ton
Hovey
James
James
Long
Marsh
Mississinewa
Maxinkuckee
Monroe
Morse
01 in
Oliver
Pigeon
Syl van
Tippecanoe
Versailles
Wawassee
Webster
Westler
Whitewater
Winona
Witmer
COUNTY
Starke
Owen, Putnam
Steuben
LaGrange
Hamilton, Marion
Steuben
Posey
Kosciusko
Steuben
Steuben
Steuben
Grant, Miami, Wabash
Marshall
Brown, Monroe
Hamilton
LaGrange
LaGrange
Steuben
Noble
Kosciusko
Ripley
Kosciusko
Kosciusko
LaGrange
Union
Kosciusko
LaGrange
-------
OLIVER & OLIN LAKES
Tributary Samplijig_Site
X Lake Sampling Site
o 1/2 i iv*Km.
-------
OLIN LAKE
STORE! NO. 1846
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that 01 in Lake is mesotrophic. It
ranked sixth in overall trophic quality when the 27 Indiana
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of
six parameters*. One lake had less and one had the same median
total phosphorus, none had less but two had the same median
dissolved phosphorus, 20 had less median inorganic nitrogen,
two had less mean chlorophyll a^, and five had greater mean
Secchi disc transparency. Near-depletion of dissolved oxygen
with depth occurred in August and October.
Survey limnologists did not observe surface concentrations
of algae but reported emergent and submerged macrophytes in the
shallow areas in August and October.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that 01 in Lake was phos-
phorus limited at the time the sample was collected (05/04/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at the other sampling
times as well.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—No known point sources impacted Olin Lake
during the sampling year.
See Appendix A.
-------
2
The present phosphorus loading of 0.81 g/m2/yr is about
1.3 times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and
Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 11). For this
reason, and because the lake is phosphorus limited, all phos-
phorus inputs should be minimized to the greatest practicable
degree to slow the aging of this water body.
2. Non-point sources—All of the phosphorus input to 01 in
Lake during the sampling year was contributed by non-point
sources. The Martin Lake outlet contributed 85.3%, and the
ungaged tributaries were estimated to have contributed 13.2%
of the total load.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 0.42 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 11.7 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 25.0 meters.
4. Volume: 4.914 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.1 years.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m$/sec)*
Martin Lake outlet 12.7 0.12
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 1.9 0.02
Totals 14.6 0.14
2. Outlet -
01 in Lake outlet 15.0** 0.14
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 111.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 91.3 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Winters, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
4
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
01 in Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from a
number of depths at one station on the lake (see map, page v). During
each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface) sample was
collected for phytoplankton identification and enumeration, and a simi-
lar sample was taken for chlorophyll ^analysis. During the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was collected for
algal assays. The maximum depth sampled was 17.7 meters.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02»N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
1ST SAMPLING ( 5/
1 SITES
RANGE MEAN
7.8 - 12.3 9.9
8.1 - 10.8 9.6
480. - 520. 493.
8.1 - 8.4 8.3
180. - 232. 194.
0.007 - 0.015 0.011
0.002 - 0.002 0.002
1.400 - 1.510 1.447
0.030 - 0.100 0.053
0.300 - 0.500 0.371
1.460 - 1.590 1.500
1.700 - 2.010 1.819
6.9 - 6.9 6.9
2.6 - 2.6 2.6
ilCAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR OLIN LAKE
STORET CODE 1846
4/73) 2ND SAMPLING ( B/ 6/73)
1 SITES
MEDIAN
9. B
9.4
490.
8.4
190.
0.011
0.002
1.430
0.040
0.400
1.490
1.820
6.9
2.6
RANGE
6.0
0.4
325.
7.5
179.
0.009
0.002
0.790
0.040
0.400
1.160
1.670
3.5
1.4
- 25.4
9.0
- 440.
8.4
- 230.
- 0.015
- 0.009
- 1.630
- 0.370
- 1.000
- 1.670
- 2.230
3.5
1.4
MEAN
15.5
4.5
384.
7.9
203.
0.011
0.004
1.267
0.118
0.617
1.385
1.883
3.5
1.4
MEDIAN
15.2
4.2
389.
7.9
204.
0.011
0.003
1.245
0.060
0.550
1.335
1.850
3.5
1.4
3RD SAMPLING (10/11/73)
1 SITES
RANGE
6.1
0.1
327.
7.3
1S6.
0.011
0.011
0.050
0.040
0.500
0.860
1.400
4.2
3.4
- 19.9
9.6
- 390.
8.5
- 226.
- 0.026
- 0.026
- 1.450
- 0.810
- 1.600
- 1.500
- 2.050
4.2
3.4
MEAN
12.2
4.8
357.
7.9
183.
0.015
0.014
0.941
0.169
0.700
1.110
1.641
4.2
3.4
MEDIAN
9.9
4.8
367.
7.9
181.
0.013
0.013
0.920
O.OSO
0.600
0.960
1.550
4.2
3.4
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
05/04/73
08/06/73
10/11/73
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
05/04/73
08/06/73
10/11/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Fragilaria sp.
2. Dinobryon sp.
3. Anabaena sp.
4. Asterionella sp.
5. Melosira S£.
Other genera
Total
1. Cyclotella s£.
2. Melosira sp.
3. Flagellates
4. Aphanizomenon sp.
5. Microcystis sp_.
Other genera
Total
1. Coccoid cells
2. Flagellates
3. Coelosphaerium sp.
4. Aphanizomenon sp.
5. Cryptomonas sp.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1
1
1 '
Algal Units
per ml
904
572
512
301
256
859
3,404
757
512
220
195
146
244
2,074
227
178
69
59
39
60
632
Chlorophyll
(yg/D
6.9
3.5
4.2
-------
7
Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control 0.010 1.625 0.1
0.050 P 0.060 1.625 13.1
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.060 2.625 12.2
1.0 N 0.010 2.625 0.1
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of 01 in Lake was low at the time the sample was collected.
The significant increase in yield with the addition of ortho-
phosphorus alone indicates phosphorus limitation. Note that
the addition of only nitrogen produced no such increase.
The lake data also indicate limitation by phosphorus;
at all sampling times, the mean inorganic nitrogen/ortho-
phosphorus ratios were 79/1 or greater.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Indiana National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in June, 1973, and was completed in May, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Indiana District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads,
in kg/km2/year, at station B-l and multiplying by the ZZ area in km2.
No known point sources impacted 01 in Lake during the sampling year.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
9
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
" Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Martin Lake outlet 290 85.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 45 13.2
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks - None
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 5 1.5
Total 340 100.0
2. Outputs -
01 in Lake outlet 70
3. Net annual P accumulation - 270 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Martin Lake outlet 12,260 84.3
^b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 1,835 12.6
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks - None
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 455 3.1
Total 14,550 100.0
2. Outputs -
01 in Lake outlet 9,000
3. Net annual N accumulation - 5,550 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Martin Lake outlet 23 965
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
j
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated" Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.81 0.64 34.6 13.2
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of 01 in Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.62
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.31
-------
12
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Pub!. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Winters, John, 1975. Personal cortmunication (lake morphometry).
IN Div. Water Poll. Contr., Indianapolis.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE
1805
1811
1817
1827
1828
1829
1836
1837
1839
18*0
1841
18*2
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
185*
1R55
1856
1857
LAKE NAME
CATARACT LAKE
GEIST RESERVOIR
JAMES LAKE
MISS1SSINEKA RESERVOIR
MONKOE RESERVOIR
MORSE RESERVOIR
WAHASEE LAKE
WEBSTER LAKE
WHITEHATER LAKE
MINONA-LAKE
WESTLER LAKE
EITHER LAKE
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
TIPPECANOE LAKE
DALLAS LAKE
OLIN LAKE
OLIVER LAKE
SYLVAN LAKE
HOVEY LAKE
VERSAILLES LAKE
BASS LAKE
CROOKED LAKE
LAKE JAMES
LONG LAKE
PIGEON LAKE
MARSH LAKE
HAMILTON LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.058
.07*.
.024
.107
.025
.084
.012
.025
.084
.035
.035
.035
.020
.019
.029
.012
.009
.170
.062
.139
.040
.019
.016
.204
.058
.093
.033
MEDIAN
INORG N
1.660
1.080
1.030
2.400
0.325
3.325
0.210
0.790
1.62C
1.250
0.860
0.900
0.220
0.195
0.830
1.460
0.920
0.130
1.050
1.090
0.250
0.120
0.190
1.920
1.945
0.270
0.720
500-
MEAN SEC
466.
472.
434.
473.
438.
473.
364.
431.
470.
444.
427.
440.
400.
391.
413.
403.
392.
469.
489.
482.
471.
410.
352.
442.
442.
451.
413.
667
500
000
444
623
222
500
000
167
667
125
333
400
500
333
333
000
833
333
000
375
111
444
667
067
333
167
MEAN
CHLORA
10
45
11
15
6
56
5
11
33
11
10
11
5
6
10
4
3
47
84
25
29
5
4
16
11
34
17
.744
.950
.533
.778
.947
.167
.000
.500
.083
.211
.712
.917
.483
.050
.067
.867
.767
.480
.267
.078
.367
.578
.856
.100
.900
.467
.450
15-
MIN DO
15
11
15
15
15
15
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
IS
14
14
14
7
14
7
15
15
15
15
15
15
.000
.600
.000
.000 /
.uoo
.000
.600
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.900
.800
.800
.600
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
MEDIAN
DISS OffTrtO P
0.013
0.009
o.ooa
0.029
o.oor
0.009
0.003
0.005
0.012
0.011
0.013
0.011
0.003
0.005
0.014
0.003
0.004
0.017
0.024
0.019
0.012
0.005
0.005
0.150
0.015
0.055
0.018
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITrt HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHE* VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
IB05
1811
1817
1827
1838
1829
1836
1837
1839
1840
18*1
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1858
1853
1854
1855
1S56
1857
LAKE NAME
CATARACT LAKE
GEIST RESERVOIR
JAMES LAKE
MISSISSINE4A RESERVOIR
MONROE RESERVOIR
MORSE RESERVOIR
WAWASEE LAKE
WEBSTER LAKE
WHITEWATER LAKE
WINONA LAKE
WESTLER LAKE
WITHER LAKE
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
TIPPECANOE LAKE
DALLAS LAKE
OLIN LAKE
OLIVER LAKE
SYLVAN LAKE
HOVEY LAKE
VERSAILLES LAKE
BASS LAKE
CROOKED LAKE
LAKE JAMES
LONG LAKE
PIGEON LAKE
MARSH LAKE
HAMILTON LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
37 1
27 (
73 (
12 (
67 (
23 (
94 (
67 (
19 (
50 I
50 (
50 (
77 (
85 (
62 <
94 (
100 (
4 (
31 (
8 (
42 1
81 (
88 (
0 (
37 (
15 (
58 (
9)
71
19)
3)
17)
6)
24)
17)
5)
12)
12)
12)
20)
22)
16)
24)
26)
1)
8)
2)
ID
21)
23)
0)
9)
4)
15)
MEDIAN
INO«G N
15
35
42
4
69
0
85
62
19
27
54
50
81
88
58
23
46
96
38
31
77
100
92
12
8
73
65
( 4)
( 9) .
( 11)
( 1)
I 18)
( 0)
( 22)
1 16)
C 5)
( 7)
( 14)
< 131
( 21)
( 23)
( 15)
( 6)
( 12)
( 25)
( 10)
( 8)
( 20)
( 26)
< 24)
( 3)
( 2)
( 19)
( 17)
500-
MEAN SEC
31
15
58
8
54
12
96
62
23
38
65
50
85
92
69
81
88
27
0
4
19
77
100
44
44
35
73
< 8)
( 4)
( 15)
( 2)
( 14)
( 3)
< 25)
( 16)
( 6)
( 10)
< 17)
( 13)
( 22)
( 24)
( 18)
( 21)
( 23)
< 7)
( 0)
( 1)
( 5)
( 20)
( 26)
( 11>
( 11)
( 9)
( 19)
MEAN
CHLORA
62
12
50
38
73
4
88
54
19
58
65
42
85
77
69
92
100
8
0
27
23
81
96
35
46
IS
31
I 16)
( 3)
I 13)
( 10)
( 19)
I 1)
( 23)
1 14)
I 5)
I 15)
< 17)
< ID
( 22)
( 20)
( 18)
( 24)
I 26)
( 2)
( 0)
( 7)
( 6)
1 21)
( 25)
( 9)
I 12)
( 4)
( 8)
15-
MIN DO
35
92
35
35
35
35
85
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
73
79
79
96
88
100
35
35
35
35
35
35
I 0)
( 24)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
1 22)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
I 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 19)
( 20)
( 20)
( 25)
( 23)
( 26)
( 0)
( 0)
I 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
37
62
65
8
69
58
98
81
42
52
37
52
98
85
31
92
88
23
12
IS
46
75
75
0
. 27
4
19
( 9)
( 16)
( 17)
( 2)
( 18)
( 15)
( 25)
( 21)
< ID
I 13)
( 9)
( 13)
( 25)
( 22)
( 8)
( 24)
( 23)
( 6)
( 31
( 4)
( 12)
( 19)
( 19)
( 0)
( 7)
( 1)
( 5)
INDEX
NU
217
243
323
105
367
132
546
361
157
260
306
279
461
462
324
4SS
501
237
177
173
307
449
486
126
197
177
261
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 1836 rtAMASEE LAKE 546
2 18<>7 OLIVER LAKE 501
3 18S3 LAKE JAMES 486
4 1844 TIPPECANOE LAKE 462
5 1843 LAKE MAX1NKUCKEE 461
6 1846 OLIN LAKE 455
7 1852 CROOKED LAKE 449
8 1828 MONROE RESERVOIR 367
9 1837 WEBSTER LAKE 361
10 1845 DALLAS LAKE 324
11 1817 JAMES LAKE 323
12 18S1 BASS LAKE 307
13 1841 MESTLER LAKE 306
14 1857 HAMILTON LAKE 281
15 1842 MITMER LAKE 279
16 1840 MINONA LAKE 260
17 1811 GEIST RESERVOIR 243
18 1848 SYLVAN LAKE 237
19 1805 CATARACT LAKE 217
20 1855 PIGEON LAKE 197
21 1856 MARSH LAKE 177
22 1849 HOVEY LAKE 177
23 1850 VERSAILLES LAKE 173
24 1839 WHITE*ATER LAKE 157
25 1829 MORSE RESERVOIR 132
26 1854 LONG LAKE 126
27 1827 MISSISSINEWA RESERVOIR 105
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR INDIANA
03/29/76
LAKE CODE 1846
OLIN LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM)
15.0
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KM)
1846A1
184661
1846ZZ
15.0
12.7
1.8
JAN
0.173
0.144
0.019
FEB
0.215
0.161
0.025
MAR
0.311
0.263
0.040
APR
0.266
0.244
0.034
MAY
0.184
0.156
0.022
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
0.142
0.119
0.017
0.085
0.071
0.010
0.025
0.021
0.002
SEP
0.026
0.022
0.003
OCT
.026
.022
.003
NOV
0.074
0.062
0.009
DEC
MEAN
0.139 0.140
0.119 0.118
0.018 0.017
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
15.0
14.5
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
1.62
1.69
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
1846A1
1846B1
1846ZZ
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
0.238
0.156
0.119
0.082
0.068
0.074
0.142
0.238
0.283
0.368
0.255
0.232
0.201
0.130
0.099
0.068
0.057
0.062
0.119
0.201
0.238
0.311
0.215
0.195
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.003
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.340
0.164
0.113
0.091
0.074
0.068
0.105
0.215
0.340
0.453
0.283
0.201
0.283
0.139
0.096
0.076
0.062
0.057
0.088
0.181
0.283
0.396
0.238
0.170
0.004
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.003
0.002
23
23
23
23
23
23
0.340
0.311
0.283
0.263
0.004
0.004
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
164601
41 33 49.0 085 23 46.0 3
OLIN LAKE
18087 INDIANA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/04
73/08/06
73/10/11
TIME
OF
DAY
13 40
13 40
13 40
13 40
13 40
13 40
13 40
10 05
10 05
10 05
10 05
10 05
10 05
16 35
16 35
16 35
16 35
16 35
16 35
16 35
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0022
0035
0048
0058
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0056
0000
0010
0015
0020
0030
0040
0058
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
12.3
12.1
11.6
9.8
8.0
7.9
7.8
25.4
24.4
20.4
10.1
6.5
6.0
19.9
18.9
15.3
9.9
8.5
6.6
6.1
HEPALES
211
0062 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
10.8
10.6
9.7
9.1
9.2
8.1
9.0
7.8
4.2
1.2
0.4
9.6
9.4
8.8
4.8
0.4
0.2
0.1
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICKOMHO
102 500
480
480
480
490
500
520
56 440
432
416
362
328
325
132 377
370
367
390
342
328
327
00400
PH
SU
8.40
8.40
8.40
8.10
8.20
8.4Q
8.10
8.40
8.40
8.00
7.80
7.50
7.50
8.50
8.4Q
8.40
7.90
7. tO
7.40
7.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
194
184
192
184
180
190
232
179
179
189
218
230
224
157
156
156
181
201
201
226
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.060
0.070
0.100
0.060
0.050
0.130
0.040
0.060
0.370
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.140
0.810
1202
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.700
0.600
0.500
1.000
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.500
0.600
0.600
1.600
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.510
1.430
1.460
1.420
1.400
1.420
1.490
1.170
1.280
1.210
1.630
1.520
0.790
0.910
0.900
0.920
1.410
1.450
0.950
0.050
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.003
0.004
0.009
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.012
0.011
0.012
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.026
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/04
73/08/06
73/10/11
00665 32217
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
OF A
DAY FEET
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
10
10
10
10
10
10
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
05
05
05
05
05
05
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
0000
0006
0015
0022
0035
0048
0058
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0056
0000
0010
0015
0020
0030
0040
0058
MG/L P
0.007
0.009
0.011
0.015
0.011
0.013
0.011
0.009
0.009
0.012
0.011
0.012
0.015
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.013
0.015
0.015
0.026
UG/L
6.9
3.5
4.2
18*601
41 33 49.0 085 23 46.0 3
OLIN LAKE
18087 INDIANA
11EPALES
0062 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1846A1
41 33 55.0 085 23 48.0 4
OLIVER-OLIN LAKE CONNECTION
18 7.5 OLIVER LAKE
0/OLIN LAKE
BANK SAMPLE-APPROACH FROM LIMBERLOST CAM
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/08/12
73/09/08
73/10/06
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/05
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
74/05/11
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
13
10
12
10
11
10
10
10
11
10
10
10
10
30
45
00
10
00
20
10
15
00
45
50
45
15
MG/L
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
.400
.280
.000
.880
.890
.010
.800
.910
.010
.940
.360
.510
.090
.040
MG/L
0.700
0.980
0.750
0.840
0.660
0.600
0.800
0.500
1.300
0.600
1.300
1.500
1.850
0.700
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.011
0.029
0.018
0.024
0.013
0.036
0.120
0.080
0.045
0.020
0.035
0.030
0.035
0.035
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.008
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.016
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.005
MG/L P
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.016
0.030
0.015
0.045
0.015
0.015
0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1846B1
41 33 52.0 085 23 16.0 4
OLIN-MARTIN LAKE CONNECTION
18 7.5 OLIVER LAKE
I/OLIN LAKE
BANK SAMPLE-APPROACH RO END NW MAKTIN LK
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/08/12
73/09/08
73/10/06
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/05
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
74/05/11
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
12
10
12
10
10
10
10
10
11
10
n
11
10
15
55
00
?0
37
45
25
45
30
50
05
00
30
MG/L
2
1
0
0
0
0
e
3
2
2
2
1
1
c
.060
.740
.820
.420
o315
.924
o820
oOSO
0500
o400
.100
»700
.400
.680
MG/L
20520
K300
0.670
Oo840
K260
0*600
UOOO
Oo700
2o850
Io400
U400
0.900
2.200
63800
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o042
«070
.022
o018
o028
o016
o!52
o080
o045
o040
0065
oOlO
.045
o055
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oo
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
008
005K
005K
005K
025
016
030
025
015
005
010
025
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o020
o005K
oOlO
oOlO
oOlO
o020
o095
o040
0250
ollO
olOO
o025
0,010
«375
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |