U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
OLIVER LAKE
LAGRANGE COUNTY
INDIANA
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER'No, 539
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
OLIVER LAKE
LAGRANGE COUNTY
INDIANA
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER-No, 339
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
INDIANA STATE BOARD OF HEALTH
AND THE
INDIANA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1976
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Indiana Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 12
VI. Appendices 13
-------
n
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning {§303(e)>, water
quality criteria/standards review {§303(c)>, clean lakes {§314(a,b)>,
and water quality monitoring {§106 and §305(b)} activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
m
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Indiana State Board of
Health for professional involvement, to the Indiana National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Indiana wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Division of Water Pollution Control, Indiana
State Board of Health, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Alfred F. Ahner, Adjutant General of Indiana,
and Project Officers Lt. Colonel Charles B. Roberts (Retired)
and Colonel Robert L. Sharp, who directed the volunteer efforts
of the Indiana National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF INDIANA
LAKE NAME
Bass
Cataract
Crooked
Dallas
Geist
Kami 1 ton
Hovey
James
James
Long
Marsh
Mississinewa
Maxinkuckee
Monroe
Morse
01 in
Oliver
Pigeon
Sylvan
Tippecanoe
Versailles
Wawassee
Webster
Westler
Whitewater
Winona
Witmer
COUNTY
Starke
Owen, Putnam
Steuben
LaGrange
Hamilton, Marion
Steuben
Posey
Kosciusko
Steuben
Steuben
Steuben
Grant, Miami, Wabash
Marshall
Brown, Monroe
Hami1 ton
LaGrange
LaGrange
Steuben
Noble
Kosciusko
Ripley
Kosciusko
Kosciusko
LaGrange
Union
Kosciusko
LaGrange
-------
26- J"'"}
OLIVER & OLIN
<8> Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
o 1/2 i
-------
OLIVER LAKE
STORE! NO. 1847
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Oliver Lake is mesotrophic. It
ranked second in overall trophic quality when the 27 Indiana
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six
parameters*. None of the other lakes had less median total
phosphorus, three had less median dissolved phosphorus, 14 had
less median inorganic nitrogen, none of the others had less
mean chlorophyll a^ and only three had greater mean Secchi disc
transparency. Marked depression of dissolved oxygen with depth
occurred in August and October.
Survey limnologists noted submerged and emergent macrophytes
in the shallows but no concentrations of algae.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Oliver Lake was phos-
phorus limited at the time the sample was collected (05/04/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—No known municipal or industrial point
sources impacted Oliver Lake during the sampling year. Lakeshore
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
septic tanks were estimated to have contributed 6.2% of the input,
but a shoreline survey would be needed to determine the signifi-
cance of these sources.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.16 g/m2/yr is less than
that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974)
as an oligotrophic loading (see page 11). Because Oliver Lake
is phosphorus limited, all phosphorus inputs should be held to
a minimum to maintain the high trophic quality of this water body.
2. Non-point sources—Over 93% of the total phosphorus input
to Oliver Lake came from non-point sources during the sampling
year. The 01 in Lake outlet contributed 29.2% and Dove Creek 25.0%
of the input. The ungaged tributaries were estimated to have
contributed 29.2% of the total phosphorus load.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
ft
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 1.50 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 12.2 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 27.7 meters.
4. Volume: 18.300 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 2.3 years.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Dove Creek 5.7 0.05
Olin Lake outlet 15.0 0.14
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 6.5 0.06
Total 27.2 0.25
2. Outlet -
Oliver Lake outlet 28.7** 0.25
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 111.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 91.3 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Winters, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
4
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Oliver Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from a num-
ber of depths at one station on the lake (see map, page v). During
each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface) sample was
collected from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumer-
ation, and a similar sample was taken for chlorophyll ^analysis.
During the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample
was collected for algal assays. The maximum depth sampled was 24.4
meters.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/D
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02*N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
1ST SAMPLING ( 5/
1 SITES
RANGE MEAN
8.4 - 11.7 10.4
9.8 - 10.7 10.4
410. - 450. 433.
8.1 - 8.5 8.3
181. - 189. 183.
0.006 - 0.009 0.007
0.002 - 0.002 0.002
0.940 - 1.010 0.987
0.040 - 0.060 0.044
0.300 - 0.300 0.300
1.000 - 1.050 1.031
1.240 - 1.310 1.287
2.7 - 2.7 2.7
3.4 - 3.4 3.4
4/73)
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR OLIVER LAKE
STORET CODE 1847
2ND SAMPLING ( 8/ 6/73)
1 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (10/11/73)
1 SITES
MEDIAN
11.4
10.5
440.
8.3
182.
0.007
0.002
0.990
0.040
0.300
1.030
1.290
2.7
3.4
RANGE
7.0
1.0
298.
7.4
156.
0.008
0.002
0.720
0.040
0.200
0.760
1.120
5.2
1.8
- 24.7
8.2
- 402.
8.4
- 188.
- 0.016
- 0.005
- 1.080
- 0.100
- 0.800
- 1.140
- 1.550
5.2
1.8
MEAN
15.8
4.9
352.
7.9
174.
0.010
0.004
0.874
0.063
0.371
0.937
1.246
5.2
1.8
MEDIAN
13.9
5.0
352.
7.7
IBS.
0.009
0.004
0.870
0.060
0.300
0.930
1.170
5.2
1.8
RANGE
7.0
0.2
301.
7.3
145.
0.012
0.012
0.240
0.030
0.400
0.590
0.960
3.4
3.0
- 19.3
9.4
- 355.
8.5
- 187.
- 0.019
- 0.015
- 0.870
- 0.400
- 0.900
- 0.910
- 1.370
3.4
3.0
MEAN
12.0
3.5
327.
7.7
168.
0.016
0.014
0.629
0.104
0.512
0.732
1.141
3.4
3.0
MEDIAN
9.6
0.8
322.
7.4
178.
0.017
O.«14
0.595
0.050
0.450
0.695
1.145
3.4
3.0
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Samp! i ng
Date
05/04/73
08/06/73
10/11/73
2. Chlorophyll a^ -
Sampling
Date
05/04/73
08/06/73
10/11/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Oocystis sp.
2. Melosira sp.
3. Fragilaria sp.
4. Pinobryon sp.
5. Cyclotella sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Stephanodiscus sp.
2. Flagellates
3. Oocystis sp.
4. Peri dim'urn sp.
5. GomphosphTena sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Fragi1aria sp.
2. Pinobryon sp.
3. Flagellates
4. Gomphosphaeria sp.
5. Dinoflagellates
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1
1
1
Algal Units
per ml
616
590
402
289
264
615
2,776
456
178
79
40
40
158
951
53
53
53
35
35
158
387
Chlorophyll a_
(ug/1)
A
2.7
5.2
3.4
-------
7
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control <0.005 0.965 0.1
0.050 P 0.055 0.965 15.2
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.055 1.965 17.6
1.0 N <0.005 1.965 0.1
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Oliver Lake was low at the time the sample was collected
(05/04/73). A significant increase in yield resulted when
only phosphorus was added, but the addition of nitrogen alone
did not result in an increase in yield; hence, phosphorus
limitation is indicated.
The lake data also indicate limitation by phosphorus;
the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 52/1
or greater at all sampling times.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Indiana National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in June, 1973, and was completed in May, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Indiana District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads for unsampled
"minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were esti-
mated using the nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at station B-l and multi-
plying by the II area in km2.
All estimated point-source phosphorus loads were reduced by 50% to
adjust for the phosphate detergent ban in effect in Indiana since Jan-
uary, 1972.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
9
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Dove Creek 60 25.0
01 in Lake outlet 70 29.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 70 29.2
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 15 6.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 25 10.4
Total 240 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Oliver Lake outlet 110
3. Net annual P accumulation - 130 kg.
* Estimate based on 96 lakeshore dwellings and one camp; see Working Paper
No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Dove Creek 5,505 23.4
01 in Lake outlet 9,000 38.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 6,280 26.7
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 1,095 4.7
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,620 6.9
Total 23,500 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Oliver Lake outlet 13,155
3. Net annual N accumulation - 10,345 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Dove Creek 11 966
01 in Lake outlet 5 600
* Estimate based on 96 lakeshore dwellings and one camp; see Working Paper
No. 175. ,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumul e ted Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 0.16 0.09 1$.7 6.9
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Oliver Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.44
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.22
-------
12
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Winters, John, 1975. Personal conmunication (lake morphemetry).
IN Div. Water Poll. Contr., Indianapolis.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE
1805
1811
1817
1837
182a
1839
1836
1837
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
IS'.*
18*5
1846
1847
1648
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
LAKE NAME
CATARACT LAKE
GEIST RESERVOIR
JAMES LAKE
MISS1SSINEWA RESERVOIR
MONROE RESERVOIR
MORSE RESERVOIR
WAWASEE LAKE
WEBSTER LAKE.
WHITEHATE* LAKE
W I NONA LAKE
WESTLER LAKE
WITHER LAKE
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
TIPPECANOE LAKE
DALLAS LAKE
OLIN LAKE
OLIVER LAKE
SYLVAN LAKE
HOVEY LAKE
VERSAILLES LAKE
BASS LAKE
CROOKED LAKE
LAKE JAMES
LONG LAKE
PIGEON LAKE
MARSH LAKE
HAMILTON LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.058
.074
.024
.107
.025
.084
.012
.025
.084
.035
.035
.035
.020
.019
.029
.012
.009
.170
.062
.139
.040
.019
.016
.204
.058
.093
.033
MEDIAN
INORG N
1.660
1.080
1.030
2.400
0.325
3.325
0.210
0.790
1.62C
1.250
0.860
0.900
0.220
0.195
0.830
1.460
0.920
0.130
1.050
1.090
0.250
0.120
0.190
1.920
1.945
0.270
0.720
500-
MEAN SEC
466
472
434
473
438
473
364
431
470
444
427
440
400
391
413
403
392
469
489
482
471
410
352
442
442
451
413
.667
.500
.000
.444
.623
.222
.500
.000
.167
.667
.125
.333
.400
.500
.333
.333
.000
.833
.333
.000
.375
.111
.444
.667
.067
.333
.167
MEAN
CHLOHA
10
45
11
15
6
56
5
11
33
11
10
11
5
6
10
4
3
47
84
25
29
5
4
16
11
34
17
.744
.950
.533
.778
.947
.167
.000
.500
.083
.211
.712
.917
.483
.050
.067
.867
.767
.480
.267
.078
.367
.578
.856
.100
.900
.467
.450
15-
MIN L>0
15
11
15
15
15
15
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
IS
14
14
14
7
14
7
15
15
15
15
15
15
.000
.600
.000
.000
.000
.000
.600
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.900
.800
.800
.600
.500
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
MEDIAN
DISS ORTnO P
0.013
0.009
0.008
0.029
0.007
0.009
0.003
0.005
0.012
0.011
0.013
0.011
0.003
0.005
0.014
0.003
0.004
0.017
0.024
0.019
0.012
0.005
O.OOS
0.150
0.015
0.055
0.018
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBEK OF LAKES WITH HIGHE* VALUES)
LAKE
CODE
1805
1811
1817
1837
1828
'1839
1836
1837
1039
182
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
LAKE NAME
CATARACT LAKE
GEIST RESERVOIM
JAMES LAKE
MISSISSINErfA RESERVOIR
MONROE RESERVOIR
MORSE RESERVOIR
HAWASEE LAKE
WEBSTER LAKE
WHITEWATER LAKE
WINONA LAKE
WESTLER LAKE
WITMER LAKE
LAKE MAXINKUCKEE
TIPPECANOE LAKE
DALLAS LAKE
OLIN LAKE
OLIVER LAKE
SYLVAN LAKE
HOVEY LAKE
VERSAILLES LAKE
BASS LAKE
CROOKED LAKE
LAKE JAMES
LONG LAKE
PIGEON LAKE
MARSH LAKE
HAMILTON LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
37 (
27 (
73 "(
12 (
67 <
23 (
94 (
67 (
19 (
SO (
50 (
SO (
77 (
85 (
62 <
94 (
100 (
4 (
31 (
8 (
42 (
81 (
88 I
0 (
37 <
15 (
58 (
9)
7)
19)
3)
17)
6)
24)
17)
5)
12) ,
12)
12)
20)
22)
16)
24)
26)
1)
8)
2)
ID
21)
23)
0)
9)
4)
15)
MEDIAN
INORG N
15
35
42
4
69
0
85
62
19
27
54
50
81
88
58
23
46
96
38
31
77
100
92
12
8
73
65
• 4)
( 9)
< 11)
I 1)
I 18)
( 0)
( 22)
1 16)
( 5)
( 7)
( 14)
( 13)
< 21)
( 23)
( 15)
( 6)
( 12)
( 25)
( 10)
( 8)
( 20)
< 26)
( 24)
I 3)
( 2)
( 19)
( 17)
500-
MEAN SEC
31
15
58
8
54
12
96
62
23
38
. 65
50
85
92
69
81
88
27
0
4
19
77
100
44
44
35
73
( 8)
( 4)
( 151
( 2)
( 14)
( 3)
t 25)
( 16)
( 6)
( 10)
( 17)
( 13)
( 22)
( 24)
( 18)
( 21)
< 23)
t 7)
( 0)
( 1)
( 5)
( 20)
( 26)
( 11)
( 11)
( 9)
( 19)
MEAN
CHLORA
62
12
50
38
73
4
88
54
19
58
65
42
85
77
69
92
100
8
0
27
23
81
96
35
46
15
31
( 16)
I 3)
( 13)
( 10)
( 19)
( D
I 23)
( 14)
( 5)
( 15)
( 17)
( 11)
( 22)
( 20)
( 18)
( 24)
( 26)
( 2)
( 0)
( 7)
( 6)
( 21)
( 25)
( 9)
( 12)
< 4)
( 8)
Ib-
MIN DO
35
92
35
35
35
35
85
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
73
79
79
96
88
100
35
35
35
35
35
35
( 0)
( 24)
( 0)
( 0)
I 0)
( 0)
( 22)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 19)
( 20)
( 20)
< 25)
( 23)
( 26)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
37
62
65
8
69
58
98
81
42
52
37
52
98
85
31
92
88
23
12
15
46
75
75
0
27
4
19
( 9)
( 16)
( 17)
( 2)
( 18)
( 15)
( 25)
( 21)
( 11)
( 13)
( 9)
( 13)
( 25)
I 22)
( 8)
( 24)
< 23)
( 6)
( 3)
( 4)
( 12)
( 19)
( 19)
( 0)
( 7)
( 1)
( 5)
INDEX
NU
£17
243
323
105
367
• 132
546
361
157
260
306
279
461
462
324
455
501
237
177
173
307
449
486
126
197
177
281
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
.RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 1836 MAMASEE LAKE 546
2 1847 OLIVER LAKE 501
3 1853 LAKE JAMES 486
4 1844 TIPPECANOE LAKE 462
5 1843 LAKE MAXINKUCKEE 461
6 1846 OLIN LAKE 455
7 1853 CROOKED LAKE 449
8 1828 MONROE RESERVOIR 367
9 1837 WEBSTER LAKE 361
10 1845 DALLAS LAKE 324
11 1817 JAMES LAKE 323
12 1851 BASS LAKE 307
13 1841 MESTLER LAKE 306
14 1857 HAMILTON LAKE 281
15 1842 WITMER LAKE 279
16 1840 WINONA LAKE 260
17 1811 GEIST RESERVOIR 243
18 1848 SYLVAN LAKE 237
19 1805 CATARACT LAKE 217
20 1855 PIGEON LAKE 197
21 1856 MARSH LAKE 177
22 1849 HOVEY LAKE 177
23 1850 VERSAILLES LAKE 173
24 1839 HHITENATER LAKE 157
25 1829 MORSE RESERVOIR 132
26 1854 LONG LAKE 126
27 1827 MISSISSINEWA RESERVOIR 105
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR INDIANA
03/29/76
LAKE CODE 1847
OLIVER LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM)
2B.7
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KM)
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
1847A1
184781
1847C1
1847ZZ
28.7
5.7
15.0
6.5
0.337
0.062
0.173
0.071
0.411
0.079
0.215
0.091
0.592
0.119
0.311
0.136
0.549
0.110
0.286
0.12S
0.351
0.068
0.184
0.079
0.269
0.054
0.142
0.062
0.161
0.031
0.085
0.037
0.054 0.051
0.008 0.009
0.025 0.026
0.010 0.010
0.054
0.009
0.026
0.010
0.142
0.028
0.074
0.031
0.263
0.054
0.139
0.062
0.269
0.052
0.140
0.060
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUM OF
DRAINAGE
AREA OF
LAKE =
SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
28.7
27.2
TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
3
3
.04
.23
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
1847A1
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
1847B1
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
0.453
0.311
0.204
0.119
0.096
0.102
0.261
0.453
0.566
0.680
0.481
0.453
0.091
0.059
0.045
0.031
0.025
0.028
O.OS4
0.091
0.110
0.136
0.096
0.088
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
0.680
0.311
0.184
0.130
0.105
0.088
0.170
0.396
0.623
0.906
0.566
0.368
0.133
0.062
0.042
0.034
0.028
0.025
0.040
0.082
0.127
0.176
0.113
0.076
23
23
23
23
0.680
0.623
0.133
0.122
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR INDIANA
03/29/76
LAKE CODE 1847
OLIVER LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH /EAR MEAN FLOW DAY
1847C1
1847ZZ
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
74
0.238
0.156
0.119
0.082
0.068
0.074
0.142
0.238
0.283
0.368
0.255
0.232
0.102
0.068
0.051
0.034
0.028
0.031
0.062
0.102
0.125
0.156
0.110
0.099
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
9
14
12
8
6
10
8
5
9
9
13
11
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.340
0.164
0.113
0.091
0.074
0.068
0.105
0.215
0.340
0.453
0.283
0.201
0.150
0.071
0.048
0.040
0.031
0.028
0.045
0.093
0.144
0.198
0.127
0.085
23
23
23
23
0.340
0.311
0.150
0.139
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
184701
41 34 17.0 085 24 15.0 3
OLIVER LAKE
18087 INDIANA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/04
73/08/06
73/10/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
FEET
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
0000
•006
0015
0025
0040
0055
0070
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0055
0075
0000
0015
0025
0035
0045
0055
0065
0080
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
11.7
11.4
11.4
11.4
10.0
8.5
8.4
24.7
24.7
23.2
13.9
9.7
7.6
7.0
19.3
19.1
16.1
10.3
9.0
7.9
7.3
7.0
11EPALES
2111202
0074 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
10.7
10.7
10.6
10.5
9.8
9.9
8.2
8.2
6.2
3.8
1.8
1.0
9.2
9.4
6.6
1.2
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.4
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
132 450
440
440
440
410
410
440
72 402
402
392
352
318
301
298
120 355
354
350
327
316
306
301
303
00400
PH
SU
8.10
8.50
8.40
8.40
8.30
8.20
8.30
8.40
8.40
8.10
7.70
7.60
7.60
7.40
8.50
8.40
8.10
7.50
7.40
7.40
7.30
7.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
184
183
182
181
181
189
182
156
158
159
185
186
185
188
145
146
153
179
179
176
180
187
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.100
0.040
0.070
0.06®
OoOSO
0.060
0.060
0.050
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.160
0.400
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.690
0.490
0.40®
0.3@0
0.200
S.200
0.300
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.900
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.910
1.000
0.990
0.990
0.990
0.990
0«940
0,790
S.7SO
O.T7&
6.999
0.94©
Jo ©80
0.876
o.sse
0.560
0.630
0.870
0.830
0.800
0.550
0.240
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.902%
t.0§2
e.oss
®«5@©3
$i>£62
®«®e4
So©® 3
a«e@4
0.095
0.014
0.013
0.012
0.015
0.014
0.014
0.013
0.014
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/04
73/08/06
73/10/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 30 0000
11 30 0006
11 30 0015
11 30 0025
11 30 0040
11 30 0055
11 30 0070
09 30 0000
09 30 0005
09 30 0015
09 30 0025
09 30 0040
09 30 0055
09 30 0075
15 45 0000
15 45 0015
15 45 0025
15 45 0035
15 45 0045
15 45 0055
15 45 0065
15 45 0080
00665
'HOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.007
0.008
0.007
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.008
0.008
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.016
0.017
0.013
0.012
0.017
0.019
0.017
0.014
0.018
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
2.7
5.2
3.4
184701
41 34 17.0 085 24
OLIVER LAKE
18087 INDIANA
15.0 3
11EPALES
0074 FEET
2111202
DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1847A1
41 34 10.0 085 24 55.0 4
OLIVER LK OUTLET
18 7.5 OLIVER LAKE
0/OLIVER LAKE
50 E RD BR06 JUST tt OF LAKE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/08/12
73/09/08
73/10/06
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/05
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
74/05/11
00630
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
OF
DAY FEET
12 35
11 25
12 30
11 45
11 30
11 10
11 00
11 45
11 00
11 15
11 30
11 00
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.850
0.670
0.540
0.430
0.420
0.460
0.552
0.710
0.840
0.950
1.040
1.100
1.010
0.980
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
i
0.780
0.780
0.680
0.500
1.500
0.650
0*500
0.300
0.400
1.300
0.650
1.100
0.700
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.019
0.061
0.040
0.025
0.042
0.096
0.068
0.020
0.020
0.045
0.050
0.015
0.025
0.020
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.008
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.008
0.005K
0.010
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.005K
0.035
0.015
0.015
0.025
K VALUE KNOrtN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/30
1847B1
41 34 40.0 085 24 55.0 4
DOVE CREEK
18 7.5 OLIVER LAKE
T/OLIVER LAKE
450 S RD BROG JUST E OF JCT WITH 50 E WO
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/08/12
73/09/08
73/10/06
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/05
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
74/05/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 55
10 00
11 00
09 35
10 53
10 00
09 45
09 30
10 30
10 30
10 40
10 30
10 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.530
0.037
0.012
0.022
0.010K
0.380
3.400
6.200
3.800
6.800
4.400
2.400
1.760
0.600
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.200
1.215
0.630
2.750
0.540
0.350
0.800
1.000
0.800
1.250
1.800
0.900
1.600
0.800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.062
0.038
0.013
0.079
0.022
0.020
0.056
0.092
0.075
0.060
0.070
0.030
0.080
0.040
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.019
0.013
0.025
0.005K
0.006
0.005K
0.008
0.012
0.010
0.055
0.030
0.005
0.010
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.050
0.037
0.050
0.035
0.020
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.015
0.080
0.085
0.025
0.010
0.035
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/07
1846A1 and 1847C1
41 33 55.0 085 23 48.0 4
OLIVER-OLIN LAKE CONNECTION
18 7.5 OLIVER LAKE
0/OLIN LAKE
BANK SAMPLE-APPROACH FROM LIMBERLOST CAM
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/08/12
73/09/08
73/10/06
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/05
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
74/05/11
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
13
10
12
10
11
10
10
10
11
10
10
10
10
30
45
00
10
00
20
10
15
00
45
50
45
15
MG/L
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
400
280
000
880
890
010
800
910
010
940
360
510
090
040
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
700
980
750
840
660
600
800
500
300
600
300
500
850
700
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PMOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
on
029
018
024
013
036
120
080
045
020
035
030
035
035
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.006
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.016
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.005
MG/L P
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.016
0.030
0.015
0.045
0.015
0.015
0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |