U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
CLINTON AND raERLAND COUNTIES,
AND
CLAY, CMEKIOL AND PiCKETL COUNTIES,
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 352
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
DALE HOliOW RESERVOIR
CLINTON AND OjilERL/WD COUNTIES,
CLAY, 0\eTON^ A&PETL COUNTIES,
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 352
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
AND THE
KENTUCKY NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1977
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Kentucky Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 10
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the'
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Kentucky Department for
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection for professional
involvement, to the Kentucky National Guard for conducting the
tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to those Kentucky
wastewater treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided
effluent samples.
Harold Snodgrass, former Director, and Mercer M. Peters of
the Division of Water Quality provided invaluable lake documen-
tation and counsel during the Survey; and the staff of the Divis-
ion reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Richard L. Frymire, the Adjutant General of
Kentucky, and Project Officers Lt. Colonel Thomas Buyher, Jr.,
and Lt. Colonel David B. May, who directed the volunteer efforts
of the Kentucky National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknow-
ledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
STATE, OF KENTUCKY
NAME
Barkley
Barren River
Cumberland
Dale Hollow
Herrington
Kentucky
COUNTY
Lyon, Trigg, KY;
Cheatham, Montgomery,
Stewart, TN
Allen, Barren
Clinton, Pulaski, Russell,
Wayne
Clinton, Cumberland, !
-------
'Mtylind
Like
DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
*^-^. Drainage Area Boundary
f Sewage Treatment Facility
: ? ',° v van.
» Ml .
Scale
85*00 '
-------
DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 2102
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Dale Hollow Reservoir is oligo-
mesotrophic; i.e., low to moderate supplies of nutrients
and low to moderate productivity. Whether nutrient enrich-
ment is beneficial or deleterious depends on the actual
or potential effect on the uses of the reservoir. In this
regard, personnel of the Kentucky Department for Natural
Resources and Environmental Protection have indicated
there is no known impairment of the beneficial uses of
Dale Hollow Reservoir.
This water body ranked first in overall trophic quality
when the five Kentucky reservoirs sampled in 1973 were
compared using a combination of six parameters*. None of
the other reservoirs had less median total phosphorus, dis-
solved phosphorus, and inorganic nitrogen. None of the others
had less mean chlorophyll a_, and none had greater mean Secchi
disc transparency. Marked depression of dissolved oxygen
with depth occurred at all sampling stations in August and
at stations 1, 2, 3, and 5 in October.
Survey limnologists reported some higher aquatic plants
present in the shallow areas, but otherwise no visible phyto-
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
plankton or other nuisance conditions were noted. The water
was described as "very clear".
In a summary report (Anonymous, 1976), it is concluded
that this is an oligotrophic reservoir of outstandingly high
water quality which supports a fine sports fishery.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate the reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the times the samples were collected
(05/18-19/73). The reservoir data also indicate phosphorus
limitation; at all sampling times, the mean inorganic nitrogen
to orthophosphorus ratios were 37 to 1 or greater.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--The phosphorus contribution of the
listed point sources amounted to 36.5% of the total input
to Dale Hollow Reservoir during the sampling year. The
Albany, Kentucky sewage treatment facility supplied 30.9%,
and the Jamestown, Tennessee plant contributed an estimated
5.6% of the total. The phosphorus loading of 0.35 g/m2/yr
measured during the sampling year is almost equal to that
proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider & Dillon, 1974) as
an oligotrophic loading (see page 15). For this reason, all
phosphorus inputs should be minimized to the greatest possible
extent to maintain the present high water quality of Dale
Hollow Reservoir.
2. Non-point sources—The phosphorus load from non-point
-------
3
sources accounted for almost 64% of the total. The Wolf
River contributed 26.4%; Spring Creek, 8.6%; the East Fork
of the Obey River, 7.5%; the West Fork of the Obey River,
6.5%; and the five remaining listed tributaries collectively
contributed 6.6% of the total. The ungaged tributaries
contributed an estimated 3.0% of the total.
The phosphorus export rate of Spring Creek was appreciably
higher than the rates of the other tributaries (see page 14).
This may have resulted from underestimation of the contribution
of the Albany wastewater treatment facility or differing land-use
practices in that drainage.
Overall, the phosphorus exports rates of the reservoir tribu-
taries were relatively low (mean of 9.1 kg/km2/yr) and compare
very well with the export rates of the 19 sampled tributaries
of nearby Cumberland Lake* (mean of 17.7 kg/km2/yr; range of
4-38 kg/km2/yr).
* Working Paper No. 351.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 108.62 kilometers*.
2. Mean depth: 14.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >36 meters.
4. Volume: 1,569.000 x 10s m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.2 years.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Spring Creek
Sulphur Creek
111will Creek
Wolf River
East Fork, Obey River
Big Indian Creek
Poplar Cove Creek
West Fork, Obey River
Big Eagle Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals 2,315.6
2. Outlet -
Obey River 2,424.2***
C. Precipitation****:
1. Year of sampling: 188.2 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 138.2 centimeters.
Drainage
area (km2)*
154.6
22.4
133.4
751.1
523.2
35.0
48.7
388.5
117.6
141.1
Mean flow
(m3/sec)*
2.74
0.41
2.43
13.71
10.90
0.73
0.95
5.86
1.74
3.16
42.63**
42.63
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt At mean elevation of 197.5 m (Moore, 1977).
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No.
1973-1976".
** Sum of inflows adjusted to equal outflow.
*** Includes area of reservoir.
**** See Working Paper No. 175.
175, "... Survey Methods,
-------
5
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Dale Hollow Reservoir was sampled three times in 1973 by means
of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physi-
cal and chemical parameters were collected from a number of depths
at six stations on the reservoir (see map, page v). During each
visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface)
sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identifi-
cation and enumeration; and during the first visit, two 18.9-liter
depth-integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Also
each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the
stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths sampled
were 34.1 meters at station 1, 36.0 meters at station 2, 29.9 meters
at station 3, 17.1 meters at station 4, 21.6 meters at station 5,
and 12.2 meters at station 6.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02+N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 5/18/73)
6 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS F04 DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 2102
2ND SAMPLING ( 8/18/73)
6 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (10/24/73)
6 SITES
RANGE
10.1
4.3
oee««
7.5
36.
0.005
0.002
0.190
0.020
0.200
0.210
0.390
0.6
1.5
- 18.9
- 10.4
-o«»«e«a<
8.1
85.
- 0.048
- 0.010
- 0.380
- 0.060
- 0.400
- 0.420
- 0.710
8.4
- 11.0
MEAN
15.6
8.8
nnn»«»«ytn
7.8
61.
0.012
0.003
0.271
0.035
0.250
0.306
0.521
2.9
6.4
MEDIAN
15.9
9.1
HHHKHJO
7.8
62.
0.010
0.002
0.280
0.030
0.200
0.300
0.505
1.0
5.9
RANGE
10.5
0.2
124.
6.2
52.
0.009
0.003
0.040
0.030
0.200
0.070
0.360
2.5
1.1
- 29.7
- 10.6
- 270.
7.8
97.
- 0.030
- 0.016
- 0.460
- 0.280
- 0.700
- 0.560
- 0.830
- 13.2
5.7
MEAN
22.3
4.8
172.
6.9
67.
0.014
0.008
0.211
0.081
0.384
0.292
0.595
6.4
3.2
MEDIAN
23.1
4.8
183.
6.8
64.
0.013
0.007
0.195
0.055
0.400
0.305
0.570
5.5
3.2
RANGE
11.0
0.6
132.
7.0
50.
0.004
0.003
0.020
0.030
0.200
0.070
0.220
0.6
1.7
- 21.8
8.0
- 290.
7.9
98.
- 0.022
- 0.010
- 0.310
- 0.740
- 0.900
- 0.770
- 1.100
2.2
5.8
MEAN
19.2
5.0
174.
7.4
66.
0.009
0.005
0.077
0.115
0.285
0.192
0.362
1.4
3.4
MEDIAI
20.7
6o5
169.
7.5
64.
0.008
0.005
0.050
0.060
0.200
0.115
0.260
1.4
3.1
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampli ng
Date
05/18-19/73
08/18/73
10/24/73
2. Chlorophyll a, -
Sampli ng
Date
05/18-19/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Flagellates
2. Dinobryon sp.
3. Asterionella sp.
4. Cyclotella sp.
5. Fragilaria ^p_.
Other genera
Total
1. Anomoeoneis sp.
2. Cyclotella ^p_.
3. Flagellates
4. Dinoflagellates
5. Asterionella sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Flagellates
2. Synedra sp.
Anomoeoneis sp.
Spherical cells
Achnanthes sp.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
Algal Units
per ml
112
73
15
10
5
66
281
817
83
71
71
59
189
1,290
447
49
49
49
26
38
658
Chlorophyll a_
0.7
0.6
0.8
1.2
5.9
8.4
-------
8
Sampl i ng
Date
08/18/73
10/24/73
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Chlorophyll a^
(yg/1)
3.3
2.5
2.6
9.1
7.7
13.2
1.5
1.4
0.9
2.1
0.6
2.2
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. Stations 1, 2, and 3 -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
b. Stations 4, 5, and 6 -
Inorganic N
Cone, (rng/1)
Maximum yield
(mg/l-dry wt.)
0.016
0.066
0.066
0.016
0.256
0.256
1.256
1.256
0.1
6.3
18.8
0.1
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
Maximum yield
(nig/1-dry wt.)
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity
0.004
0.054
0.054
0.004
0.294
0.294
1.294
1.294
0.1
3.4
10.0
0.1
-------
9
of Dale Hollow Reservoir was low at the times the assay
samples were collected (05/18-19/73). Also, the increased
yields when phosphorus alone was added indicate phosphorus
limitation. Note that the addition of nitrogen alone did
not result in increased yields.
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at
all sampling times. The mean inorganic nitrogen to
orthophosphorus ratios were 37 to 1 or greater at all
sampling times, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.
-------
10
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Kentucky and
Tennessee National Guards collected monthly near-surface grab samples
from each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except
for the months of January and February when two samples were collected at
many of the sites. Sampling was begun in April, 1973, and was completed
in March, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Kentucky District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient exports, in kg/km2/year, at stations B-l, C-l, D-l, F-l,
G-l, H-l, and J-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km2.
The operator of the Albany, Kentucky wastewater treatment plant
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. The
operator of Jamestown, Tennessee wastewater treatment plant did not
participate in the sampling program, and nutrient loads were esti-
mated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment (m3/d) Water
Albany, KY 2,500f Imhoff tank 1,288.0 Cedar Fk./
Spring Cr.
Jamestown, TN 1,898* Imhoff tank 718.4** Rock Castle Cr./
E. Fk., Obey R.
2. Known industrial - None
t Treatment plant questionnaire.
* 1970 Census.
** Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Spring Creek 3,290 8.6
Sulphur Creek 195 0.5
Illwill Creek 825 2.2
Wolf River 10,100 26.4
East Fork, Obey River 2,850 7.5
Big Indian Creek 280 0.7
Poplar Cove Creek 340 0.9
West Fork, Obey River 2,465 6.5
Big Eagle Creek 870 2.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 1,130 3.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Albany, KY 11,790 30.9
Jamestown, TN 2,150 5.6
d. Septic tanks* - 10 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,900 5.0
Total 38,195 100.0
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - Obey River 13,085
3. Net annual P accumulation - 25,110 kg.
* Estimate based on 29 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Spring Creek 102,165 7.8
Sulphur Creek 11,375 0.9
Illwill Creek 103,185 7.9
Wolf River 330,745 25.3
East Fork, Obey River 297,695 22.8
Big Indian Creek 15,155 1.2
Poplar Cove Creek 36,215 2.8
West Fork, Obey River 125,850 9.6
Big Eagle Creek 65,505 5.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 76,195 5.8
c. Known municipal STP's -
Albany, KY 18,660 1.4
Jamestown, TN 6,455 0.5
d. Septic tanks* - 310 *0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 117,265 9.0
Total 1,306,775 100.0
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - Obey River 2,585,010
3. Net annual N loss - 1,278,235 kg.
* Estimate based on 29 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Spring Creek 21 661
Sulphur Creek 9 508
111will Creek 6 774
Wolf River 13 440
East Fork, Obey River 5 569
Big Indian Creek 8 433
Poplar Cove Creek 7 744
West Fork, Obey River 6 324
Big Eagle Creek 7 557
-------
15
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.35 0.23 12.0 loss*
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Dale Hollow Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.68
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.34
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This
may have been due to nitrogen fixation in the lake, solubilization of
previously sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water,
or unknown and unsampled point sources discharging directly to the lake.
Whatever the cause, a similar nitrogen loss has occurred at Shagawa Lake,
Minnesota, which has been intensively studied by EPA's former National
Eutrophication and Lake Restoration Branch (Malueg et al., 1975).
-------
16
LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1976. Water quality conditions in Dale Hollow Lake.
Nashville Distr., U.S. Corps of Engineers, Nashville, TN.
Malueg, Kenneth W., D. Phillips Larsen, Donald W. Schults, and
Howard T. Mercier; 1975. A six-year water, phosphorus, and
nitrogen budget for Shagawa Lake, Minnesota. Jour. Environ.
Qual., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 236-242.
Moore, E. C., 1977. Personal communication (reservoir morphometry).
Engr. Divn., Nashville Distr., U.S. Corps of Engineers, Nashville,
TN.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
17
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LA*t DATA TO BE USEU IN
LA
-------
OF LAKES *1TM HIGHLK VALUES
LAKE
COiJt LAKE NAME
2101 LAKE CUMStKLANU
3102 UALE HOLLO* KESEHVOIW
21l)J Ht^INGFUN LAiVt
2104 KENTUCKY LAKE
2*05 BARKEN RIVER KESEKVOIR
MEUl AN
TOTAL
60 (
8U (
U (
20 (
40 (
P
3)
4)
0)
1)
2)
MtDIAN
INOKG
60 (
60 (
0 (
20 (
40 (
N
3)
4)
0)
1)
2>
bOO-
MEAN
MEAN SEC
60 (
bO (
40 (
0 (
20 (
3)
4)
2)
0)
1)
CriLOHA
60 (
80 (
0 (
20 (
40 (
3»
4)
0)
1)
2)
15-
MlN
20 (
60 (
20 (
80 (
20 (
MEDIAN
00
0)
3)
0)
4)
0)
DISS
40 (
80 (
0 (
20 i
60 (
P
2>
4)
0)
1)
3)
INI
NO
3(
4(
It
21
-------
—«•» -**~±1
LAKES RANKED HY INJE* NOb.
WANK LAKE CUUE LAKE, NAME IUDEA NO
t 2102 UALE HOLLUrt HEbEHVOIH
2 2101 ' LAKE CUMBERLAND 300
3 2lub dAHKEN HIv/Ert KESEHVOIH 220
<» 2104 KENIUCKY LAKE 160
b 2103 HENH1NGTON LAKE 60
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
4
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TSitiUTAhir FLO* INFORMATION FOR KENTuCKr
CODE 2102
TOTAL
DALE HOLLOw
OF LAKEISQ KM)
242*.
TRIBUTARY A9EA(SJ
JAN
FEB
APR
NORMALISED FLOWS(CMb)
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
NOV
DEC
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
2319.5
TOTAL FLOW IN = 511.55
TOTAL FLOW OUT = 512.11
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
2102A1
2102tU
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
73
73
73
73
73
n
73
73
73
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
4.02
6.74
3.43
2.62
0.49
0.17
0.10
4.87
5.38
12.60
5.41
5.95
0.58
0.97
0.50
0.38
0.07
0.03
0.01
0.71
0.78
1.83
0.78
0.86
1
17
22
19
16
14
18
5
2
17
1
17
22
19
16
14
18
5
2
17
29
3.88
4.02
0.51
0.30
0.15
0.10
0.34
9.23 20
14.64 17
3.51
0.56 29
0.58
0.07
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.05
1.34 20
2.12 17
0.51
FLOW DAY
6.51
FLOw
2.28
2.59
0.93
0.32
0.37
MEAN
21U2A1
2102B1
2102CI
2i020i
2102E1
2102F1
2102G1
2102H1
2102J1
2102K1
21022Z
15^.6
22.4
133.4
751.1
523.2
35.0
48.7
388.5
117.6
2424.2
145.0
S.6b
0.62
4.9U
27.52
21.86
1.46
i.91
12.01
3.34
48.9*
5.66
6. MO
0.99
5.46
33.13
26.14
1.75
2.29
14.67
4.02
50.40
6.82
6.63
0.96
5,72
32. 2d
25.17
1.68
2.21
14.27
4.16
63.15
6.60
4.08
0.5Q
3.54
19.08
16.00
1.07
1.39
8.61
2.64
67.96
4.13
2.16
0.31
1.87
10.51
9.32
0.62
0.78
4.47
1.38
46.44
2.32
1.54
0.22
1.33
7.<»8
4.7U
0.31
0.46
2.51
0.96
39.64
1.36
0.10
0.15
0.90
5.10
3.62
0.24
0.33
1.91
O.d2
37.38
0.98
0.39
0.06
0.33
1.69
1.80
0.12
0.14
0.98
0.45
41.63
0.43
0.<*6
0.07
0.39
2.22
1.87
0.13
0.16
0.93
0.40
32.56
0.48
0.37
0.05
0.32
1.81
1.63
0.11
0.13
0.72
0.27
25.29
0.40
1.52
0.22
1.31
7.39
6.14
0.41
0.52
2.97
0.76
23.84
1.55
3.43
0.50
2.94
16.59
13.54
0.91
1.17
6.85
1.85
34.83
3.48
2.74
0.41
2.43
13.71
10V90
0.>3
0.95
5.86
1.74
42.63
2.83
-------
T9J6UTAHY f-LO* IMFOKMATION FU* K£NIJC
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FGS KENTUCKY
a/3/75
LA
TKlbUTAr
-------
TRIBUTARY Ft_0w INFORMATION FOK KENTUCKY
2/3/75
LA
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STCMET RETRIEVAL CUTE 7b/01/27
210201
36 32 23.0 085 26 49.0
DALE HOLLO*
21 KENTUCKY
DATE
TO
73/05/18
73/08/18
73/10/24
OOOlU
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
09
09
09
Ov
09
Ov
09
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
0000
0006
0015
0035
0050
0075
0100
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0100
0112
0000
0010
0035
0045
0050
0080
0111
CENT
17.9
17.9
17.9
15.6
12.8
11.9
11.0
28.3
28.2
26.4
20.8
17.5
14.8
13.0
11.7
10. 5
21.6
21.5
21.4
21.4
19.2
14.8
11.0
11EPALES
00300
DO
MG/L
9.4
9.8
10.4
10.3
9.6
9.1
8.6
10.6
9.2
6.2
4.b
4.0
2.0
1.6
7.8
7.9
7.4
3.0
1.0
0.9
00077 00094
T*ANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHl FIELD
INCHES MICtfOMHO
432 198
188
188
192
193
190
190
144 181
185
180
160
135
127
132
142
148
180 160
160
160
160
143
132
145
3
00400
PH
SU
7.90
8.00
8.10
8.00
8.00
7.9U
7.80
7.50
7.40
7.10
6.90
6.60
6.50
6.30
6.30
. 6.20
7.90
7.90
7.80
7.60
7.20
7.10
7.10
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
65
65
63
63
61
63
63
61
60
60
61
54
55
61
64
66
59
62
62
61
57
62
77
211
0104
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.070
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.080
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.600
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
0.20 OK
0.200K
0.800
0.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.190
0.190
0.190
0.200
0.240
0.260
0.290
0.080
0.060
0.150
0.220
0.270
0.350
0.360
0.360
0.340
0.060
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.290
0.300
0.110
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.003
0.010
0.003
0.005
0.005
0.008
0.011
0.010
0.007
0.013
0.010
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.004
0.009
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.006
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
DATE
00665
OATE TIME DEPTn PnOS-TOT
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET M.G/L f
73/05/18
73/08/18
73/10/24
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
0000
0006
0015
0035
0050
0075
0100
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0100
0112
0000
0010
0035
0045
0050
0080
0111
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
j
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
.010
.009
.009
.012
.010
.006
.008
.012
.018
.014
.011
.012
.011
.018
.011
.015
.007
.009
.008
.008
.007
.008
.012
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
0.7
3.3
l.S
210201
36 32 23.0 085 26 49.0
DALE HULLO* RESERVOIR
21 KENTUCKY
11EPAL£S
3
2111202
0104 FEET
DEPTH
-------
ET KETRIEVAL OATt 75/01/27
£10202
36 33 42.0 065 23 04.0
DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
21 KENTUCKY"
00010
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/18
73/08/18
73/10/24
TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0040
0065
0090
0118
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0086
0000
0010
0035
0045
0055
0080
0111
HATER
TEMP
CENT
18
18
18
14
12
11
10
29
28
27
20
17
15
12
21
21
21
21
18
14
11
.3
.3
. 1
.8
.1
.2
.1
.1
.4
.5
.9
.6
.5
.7
.8
.7
.5
.1
.4
.7
.2
11EPALES
C0300
DO
MG/L
8.7
9.8
1C.O
9.0
9.0
7.5
8.0
7.8
5.0
2.2
2.0
7.4
7.0
4.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
00077 00094
TKANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICHOMHO
369 196
181
181
180
198
192
198
226 186
184
183
152
130
124
131
228 163
162
163
153
147
150
152
3
00400
PH
SU
7.90
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.90
7.70
7.70
7.30
7.30
6.90
6.50
6.30
6.20
6.30
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.20
7.10
7.10
7.10
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
62
62
62
61
60
60
64
62
62
62
58
52
58
71
55
53
52
53
50
61
80
2111202
0122
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.180
0.300
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.240
0.240
0.250
0.280
0.310
0.310
0.300
0.140
0.200
0.190
0.260
0.270
0.340
0.410
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.120
0.310
0.030
0.040
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTriO
MG/L P
0.002K
0.003
0.009
0.002K
0.002K
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.009
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.016
0.006
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.008
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO*£T wtTRIEVAL DATE 7D/01/27
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/18
73/U8/18
73/10/24
TIME
OF
DAY
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 ^0
14 40
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0040
0065
0090
Olid
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0086
0000
0010
0035
0045
0055
0080
0111
00665
PrtOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.006
0.011
0.048
0.011
0.009
0.010
U.009
0.009
0.009
0.013
0.020
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.008
0.013
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
OG/L
0.6
2.5
1.4
210202
36 33 42.0 085 23 04.0
UALE rIOLLO* RESERVOIx
21 KENTUCKY
11EPALES
3
2111202
0122 FEET
DEPTH
-------
210,203
36 36 55.0 085 17 57.0
DALE HOLLO* RESERVOIR
21 KENTUCKY
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/18
73/08/18
73/10/24
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TtMP
DAY FEET
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
58
58
58
58
58
58
0000
0006
0015
0035
0055
0075
0098
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0095
0000
0010
0030
0045
0060
0089
CENT
18.
18.
18.
15.
12.
11.
11.
29.
28.
27.
20.
17.
14.
13.
12.
21.
21.
21.
21.
17.
13.
3
2
0
a
6
9
0
3
5
0
3
4
9
1
3
4
3
3
0
7
5
00300
DO
MG/L
9.
9.
9.
8.
8.
7.
8.
6.
2.
I.
0.
0.
0.
7.
6.
6.
0.
0.
4
6
1
6
4
8
2
0
6
8
8
2
8
0
8
0
6
6
11EPALES
00300
00
MG/L
9.*
9.6
9.1
8.6
8.4
7.8
8.2
6.0
2.6
1.8
0.8
0.2
0.8
7.0
6.8
6.0
0.6
0.6
00077 0009"*
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
288 181
180
179
181
182
181
190
144 189
186
193
167
1*8
160
163
150
156 167
167
168
170
172
173
3
00400
PH
SU
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.90
7.80
7.70
7.70
7.30
7.20
6.70
6.50
6.30
6.20
6.20
6.20
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.20
7.00
7.00
00410
T AL*
CAC03
MG/L
60
59
59
56
56
61
63
59
59
63
64
62
83
89
85
61
59
60
60
79
86
2111202
0102
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.100
0.060
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.160
0.240
0.270
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.360
0.740
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.600
0.600
0.300
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
0.900
00630
N02kN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.280
0.280
0.280
0.270
0.320
0.340
0.320
0.230
0.150
0.180
0.460
0.380
0.300
0.060
0.130
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.020
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.003
0.008
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.011
0.007
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.012
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.006
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
iTOKtT *t.Tr
-------
5TOP.ET ^ETrUEVAL DATt 75/01/27
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/05/18
73/06/18
73/10/24
00665 32217
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT OLRPHfL
OF A
OAr FEET
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
58
58
58
58
58
58
0000
0006
0015
0035
0055
0075
0098
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0095
0000
0010
0030
0045
0060
0089
MG/L P
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.010
0.009
0.011
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.010
U.011
0.009
0.011
0.015
0.013
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.009
UG/L
0.8
2.6
0.9
210203
3b 36 55.0 085 17 57.0
DALE HOULOw
21 KE.-iTUOY
11EPALES
3
2111202
0102 FtET
DEPTH
-------
*ET*IttfAL OATr 75/01/2?
310205
36 31 03.0 065 11 58.0
OALE HOLLO* RESERVOIK
21 KENTUCKY
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/08/18
73/10/24
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/08/ld
73/10/24
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 00 0000
13 00 0006
13 00 0015
13 00 0035
13 00 0050
13 00 0071
18 00 0000
18 00 0005
18 00 0020
13 00 0030
18 00 0045
10 25 0000
10 25 0010
10 25 0020
10 25 0050
10 25 0062
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 00 0000
13 00 0006
13 00 0015
13 00 0035
13 00 OU50
13 00 0071
18 00 0000
18 00 0005
18 00 0020
18 00 0030
18 00 0045
10 25 0000
10 25 0010
10 2S 0020
10 25 0050
10 25 0062
00010
nATER
TEMP
CENT
18.7
18.5
18.4
15.2
13.3
12.3
29.4
29.3
27,8
24.1
18.8
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.4
17.7
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.017
0.007
0.006
0.013
0.013
0.016
0.016
0.019
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.012
0.013
00300
DO
MG/L
9.2
8.6
8.6
8.0
7.8
8.6
7.0
4.8
3.0
7.0
7.0
5.2
1.4
32217
CrtLRPHYL
A
UG/L
5.9
7.7
0.6
00077 000*4
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES M1CKOMHO
180
86
84
180
180
160
150
180
iao
185
183
182
190
148
172
171
172
186
194
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SO
7.80
8.00
7.60
7.60
7.50
7.50
7.70
7.50
6.80
6. 50
6.50
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.20
7.10
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
47
46
44
39
62
64
66
64
68
63
66
64
65
64
66
66
211
0075
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.070
0.050
0.040
0.070
0.060
0.070
0.100
0.5dO
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.700
0.400
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.800
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.260
0.230
0.230
0.220
0.310
0.310
0.120
0.090
0.220
0.310
0.310
0.050
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.020
00671
PnOS-DIS
ORTrtO
MG/L P
0.002
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.010
0.007
0.010
0.007
0.007
0.003
0.005
0.004
0.006
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE: *ETKIE\/AL DATE 75/01/27
210206
36 27 02.0 085 07 05.0
DALE HOLLO* RESEKVOIK
21 KENTUCKY
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/08/18
73/10/24
U0010
HME OEaTrt WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET CENT
13
13
13
13
13
18
18
18
18
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
35
25
25
25
05
05
05
05
0000
0006
0015
0025
0040
0000
0005
0015
0035
0000
0005
0015
0027
18.8
18.2
16.1
15.2
14.9
29.7
28.2
27.1
22.2
18.6
18.8
18.0
17.0
00300 OC077 OOOS»<+
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMMO
9.6
9.4
9.4
9.2
8.8
4.6
1.3
8.0
7.0
7.0
60
42
65
175
170
180
190
180
188
186
204
270
204
206
290
256
11EHALES
4
00400
PH
SO
7.70
7.80
7.70
7.60
7.70
7.50
7.>»0
6.90
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.50
00<»10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
48
47
37
36
80
68
67
72
76
67
64
81
98
211
0044
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.050
0.080
0.280
0.120
0.100
0.100
0.100
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.500
0.400
0.200K
0.200K
U.200K
00630
N02<»N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.190
0.190
0.210
0.220
0.320
0.070
0.050
0.080
0.180
0.090
0.070
0.180
0.100
00671
PrfOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002
0.003
0.012
0.006
0.011
0.009
0.003
0.005
0.004
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/19 13 50 0000 0.010 8.4
13 50 0006 0.009
13 50 0015 0.005
13 50 0025 0.006
13 50 0040 0.010
73/08/18 18 25 0000 0.016 13.2
18 25 0005 0.015
18 25 0015 0.016
18 25 0035 0.022
73/10/24 10 05 0000 0.019 2.2
10 05 0005 0.010
10 05 0015 0.009
10 05 0027 0.013
* VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN I.MDICATEO
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
21.241 LS2102M
36 3f, 00.0 085 0«J 30.0
•3-t'jj CK-I ->u .5 MI .\w LOCUST 33UVE SCHOOL
MERLES 3111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
QATt
TRQM
TI«F 0£JT-. ••iO?s':r.2 Ti>f
OF *i-r.n.j|_ \
Tr< OAl FtfT
73/04/01
73/04/23
73/06/17
73/07/??
73/0 V 13
73/09/16
"'3/10/1^
73/11/I3
7^/01/05
74/01/?0
74/02/0?
74/)?/17
74/)3/l 7
10
1C
10
10
09
08
09
16
1*
10
10
1C
10
00
?0
20
05
45
30
^0
40
Ct
?0
45
30
'5
MT-
',
J
rt
3
Q
;>
0
i:
1
1
0
0
0
/I
.700
.470
.890
.6-^0
.630
.590
.37-i
.5^
. 1=^
.0^0
.770
.770
» ' j -J i •
ff\
v
0
0
0
2
0
c>
n
•,
0
•y
0
[J
~ •> :
\>
/L
.020
.010
. 0 3 •*
.0?9
.072
.Ov3
.OC5^
.01^
.03J
.OlJ
.12^
.070
.030
•••••-71 00665
-"'-•'•5-0 is PMOS-TOT
•J-T'-'O
"C-/L P
: . o 1 2
C-.005K
0 . 0 1 ft
0.273
0.300
0 . 350
.'.37H
0.240
1.005
.'.025
C . 0 1 0
:.015
. .03?
WG/
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L P
.050
.045
.055
.400
.345
..3«0
«42u
.275
.060
.025
.035
.040
". VSLUr K 10 . .'
LESS
TO
-------
Ti"-
1 " DC
7V07/?? 0-i iC
71/09/1- o-» rr
7VIC/l^t vi ••> '. r
7 V 1 1 / 1 6 10 r-f
7^/(! I/QS lr, "10
74/n?/o? 10 ro
7A/C3/17 0^ ^5
I-T
'••••:- -•.-••'
rrr.ii.
C-/L ^~/L
0.170 O.C33
0 . 1 0 11 *• 0 . • l ^
') • ° •• i u.vl'j
0. 1 7U 0.01.'
•j.?»i 0.05M
'.11- ...C'^7
j . '.-r ''. ., i^
o .-•?!. ; .•, s-+
•',")' 1-.010
0 . lUl r. .1 .C051-:
'.°0., j.170
:.-r;.J ->..lst;
1.^0", -..vv1-
"• '• 5 7 I
"i^THO
i/r./L ^
O.OC5<
O.OO^K
n.006
0.010
i'. .007
o.013
, .011
0.00-
n.oob
0.005
j.020
'j .Oi15<
o.OOS^
> -'"'
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3^ ~i- 00.: Oe5 12 00.0
•i JL--U0 C^EE^
:! ?.-> itdANY . KI -TN
i/-i^'..£ '-.uLOv "Ebv-
lH->-»LFS 21112
<- 0000 F
^5
L 3
.015
.015
.020
.015
.015
.0 IS
.U2S
.0 35
.010
.005*
.010
.005K
55
K v/fiLUE KNO»i\ T'j dc.
LESS Tr-JN INOIC.jT£j
-------
^ '-- 30. , 0-5 14. 00.'J
,LL' ILL C-I-.L*
-' i '. "• ifr A".'v . -' r-1
/ _!_£ - ._._ ;•,. jc-<;y_
.'• S F -1.-G.': ^G'.-niC"' C-'cE
~PO'-'
TO
73/0^/01
7^/Pft/l 7
73/37/P5
73/93/1-
7T/G'-»/lS
7V 10/1*
73/11/1*
7^/01/0=
7/i/3 1/?3
7&/0?/0?
7^/0.?/l7
7&/OVI7
0?
->a» rP^T
1= no
0s, ~C
fi-j ?7
J? lc
09 30
i'- ^-~
•jn ts
1^ IS
»i° Sh
11 30
-1^. ?0
CJ ^0
,-(-'f.M_
'••i:/L v '/I
^.3 7 "i C.'^u
.>.op.i C-.? = u
" . 3 1. o ri . ? 1 0
1 . ~< c .' «• . - j '.
i' . 3 C 1 . 1 5 J
•,'.u r v o.'--.v.
./.'Mr- C.-'.''
i.l . • C."'r
•^ . 7 « : : . i u v K
C.^-.i I.5-''''
O.S?:- ?.?OC
"•.S.,- O.-O','
r ; r -v. L
•' j/L
.!.Pfci.
0 . 0 ° c
•: .on
'j . 0 6 ^
:) . ??'•)
• ' . •-' j t
' .• . J 3 5
,'! . C: •) ~-~
J.COSK
• j . 0 6 r>
C.02?
0. ! ?0
^ r
.^r-/
P
ii
';
•j
0
D
0
")
0
^
u
-iO
L P
.005<
.OOS^
.OOSK
.OOSrt
.005^
. 0 0 ft
.OO^K
.OOS
.005K
.OOSK
. 0 0 SK
MG/
0
0
C
u
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
^ J
. o i ;••
.010
.DOS*
.015
.01 =
. 0 1 \.
. 0 1 ij
.010
.ouS1^
.oos
.005A
K VALUE KNOwM TO
LESS THiN
oooo FEET
-------
DtTF T:-? )-" ••;•.•,;. T 7 .,--_ • •.. -_.•>•;_.-!!<. .
r= jv .)c -i n ; . ^7 •! O-T-C
-.F$V->
-_. -,:?.- '••! rti*. .IF SI ATIC
2111?0<«
oooo
0.010
i' -^ -:.3-..v o.?"-'. ?.-:u o.jii c.o?c
! T 1^ ••.3-7 '.•i-^'" '..;''?"' 'LOC5K 0.01U
73/Q7/11 1? ^!> L .H- i j.^-.,- O.-Mt 'l.OOo 0.0*0
1's I". '- . J ' ' •:..-'.•'.• -..*•• J.O'-' O.u3^
73/10/1- !1 30 ..^-3-. 1.3C- v.,^' ?.''!? O.O^S
73/11/1-. lr. C1" ...--'' i.l-j -..•..^ i,. 020 0.035
7T/1 ?/2o iO :>0 •-.--'• ".'O: ••.-,'?'• ';.012 J.OJ5
7'./0!/lt II 3° I-.'1" „• .ITU-C 'LCI;1 'LOOP 0.010
1? 00 '-.4JC '.v.30y O.r;!^ n..005K 0.016
i' is . .3.?^ I.K'^ •;.:•?•) C'.OOSK u.ois
',' . 0 10 0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
•- ^S OO.o
? 01 30.0
'C'-/li li "JO
73/05/0= 11 C%
73/0^/OJ I2' =•"
7T/07/11 1C '-.0
73/Oa/l^ 11 . V*
73/1;
7fc/0 I/ 1s:.
7^/0 --VO-
13
K-
3"
1 '•
or.
• - L
•'-.-/L
i .?•••:
• • "' ^ o
r . ^- ^.0
i.' . - °V
'. . 1 " • - K
> . i .! V •
! L 1 -'
'.-•}.'
J . 1 'j V.' •%
.'• . .-• .'
" . l,V;.<
0.10j<
< 1 1 - •
r i T" .'- 'u
•• •- / 1.
O..JS-H
•". :?3
'.'. 1 "41-
'• . r '^2
•. 51S-
,.. 1 -
• ' . P *^ \.
'. . '. Sf-
i.O'-'O
'• . ? 'i ~
•:.''?j
;• . o :j j
"uPT
M.;;/
0
U
0
0
0
'•j
'.i
V,
n
0
0
0
- , 1 | - K
L lj
.007
.oor^
.oos^
.OObK
.005K
. '1 0 - 1^
.007
. 0 0 c-f
.01?
.OO^K
. 0 0 SK
.005K
n,.,3
••tG/
J
0
u
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
-T it
L ^
.01-
.01')
.015
.020
.015
• uO->.
.010
.030
.01?
.0-15
.COS
.020
K VALUE. KNOWN TO Be
LESS THAN INDICATED
r ''-I
Or j41-t£5Tu'"N
21 1 120*
uooo FEET o
-------
TT
il
FF"T
7TXO-X1- 11 «C
71/0 VO" 11 1^
73/06/01 lc, 10
7.1/07X 11 1 J 55
73/J-/!^ 11 f-^
1! -' 1300
73/1 !/l- 1 ) "<0
n 0°
1 1 UO
1? ?0
!.<*.!.
''.SI.'
. T --J-L
1 n i: K
J"> J
lor
."Mil,
? 1 ,• 2 H '- 7 * ?. J
* ?S GO.', '1:>5 01 00.0
I 7.-, *•! ^>KTj i T\
' --^'- --,L'_ "' 'I -'i 5^-
;''-T -o -.-:•-, .3 «i c. OF -t
Or'b71 O'^'1'-
--OS-OIS r^MOS-TOT
I "T.1L
•i-i XL
: , c i -L
:> . f •, -
) . •"• i 7
'"i . o r- J
:.• . n 1 1
i "*. "' "*
A . ' •*•=•
1 l"' *? "•
•'1 .ill?
j . 0 0 &
<"• . 0 C ^
•j .OK-
i *p T
Mr,/
0
u
0
0
L
;>
L1
0
0
0
I'
->0
L o
.005K
.V»j'}*
.30-*
.006
.005K
. 0 U 7
.00?
.OOA
.01?
.016
.Ol'SK
.GOHK
MG/L -
O.OOS--'
O.OOS«:
0.01S
0.0?^
0.010
0.007
0.00^
U.G1S
0.01 =
0.030
0.005*
O.U07
0000 FEET
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THiN INDICATELJ
-------
c-; 00. J
OH 30.0
-/L
73/1 '»/ 1."
7 VO^/C-i
73/3V01
73/07/1 1
7 v)-/i-;
73/04/1 i
7V 1 •.!/!-•
73/1 1/1-
73/1 ?/?'•!
74/0 1 / 1 ^
7«/C
7fc/PV?0
11
10
1"
10
10
i 0
!<••
I?
1?
1?
10
13
on
ac
~5
?C
a5
15
no
30
15
t"?
?0
30
,.-
' J t. L
I'/L
t1 . ric^
•: . i ).j
u.^J>;
:. v>'j
0. 120
•j . i?»*
i . 'J j '-
i . '50
•: .'*oi
O. 1 10K
L . 100K
C.POfi
' • K- T
T ">T
M-,
0
0
n
f\
0
•_i
i',
".
•)
j
(j
<•
— i "
/.(_
/L
.i)OS<
.C05<
.011
.037
.019
.0 I J
.lt>2
,«ia
.0'Jr>
.UOtK
. 0 0 5
. '> 1 0
o >-, -
„ U, ( ~\ V^ _
U-'T-l
•iG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
•j .
0 .
n.
y .
0.
u .
.'l
.-, T C
' M >
0
r1
OC5^
Oil
005K
OOSi^
OoS".
0 0 &.
009
01?
oos<
OOSK
005
0-16
j ^. \ r
-"-< .; v —
MG/L
0.
0.
J.
0.
c .
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
i". T.- -M1. E-TO-j T\>
' / \l r -i.'Li. ' ••' -tSV-<
— . , .O ^_> . , ; i .t T ^ i )F S
_ _ -^ . 3 ' . , 1 k> • j r .T
i if-1 ii.es ?i
« 000
e5
r JT
j
005<
eic
O05.\
015
005K
liJ5
00*
00'-)
035
005
010
030
LESS THAN INDICATED
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
-------
A d~ 00.0 7=5 10 30. J
F0«\ Oo£r 3IVE"
i 7 . -i it J INt T'i
i>'_ n :I_L
1 5 T £•
~Jj,V
TO
73/CW14
73/G5/PS
7VO«f/0 1
73/07/1 i
73/0 R/l-
7VO--3/1 >
7V1V1-1
73/1 I/I-
73/1 '/?y
7 <./(•) I/ If-.
7<4/0^/0^
7
1=.
^ ,-
*j r.
f. A
t^
15
10
I*
-5
- "i
• . -v u/ : 1
•.- [••!'..
" >/L
'>.'. J^
.-. !•*•:•
.'.i--;
: . ? r,
y . ?t>o
. . 1 '-0
i . i •: ;•
•« i '.-
C. . 3 -• C
O.P?^
J.?.V;
•!.!'•-
J. i 7-
T'. f
-!f.
II
G
1
1
0
L'.
P
:1
0
0
•)
y
0
«,3i
'- J-L
/L
. l.)0<
."'':
.'•O'!
.'00
.10G<<
. IOC"
.(•C .
•3 /-, .
0 .^ v- C-
.100
. 30'.i
.If JK
.1 •:•,"<.
~ ! '"'
T *-L
•• J/t
O..JOSK
;.nr,t,«
".C3C
•J . 1 ?^
./ . G 1 f-
. .^ 1.
•J.15U
•/ . c i s
0 . C u «
j . 0 i) t3
.1.C".5
J.GZ5
. . .01 j
-nD
0-T
7 .'!
- ' i ^ -
••:•',/ L r-
.3
0
A
U
'j
0
o
c
0
0
0
0
.OOSK
.00»
.005^
,ous<
.'J05K
.(•Of".
.007
. P 0 ?
.OU::l^
.005«
.005*
.005
.OOSK
0-'
H'Ob
^cS
-TIT
Mo/L ->
0
0
0
0
0
l>
c
\>
0
0
0
11
0
.010
.o?c
.0^0
.010
.OOSK
.OO^K
.010
.C07
.o?s
.015
.005
.015
.(•05K
,, r t00 FEET
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
7V07/
' . i
. '; '" lo MI NM£ OF L
Jl-:-:iLES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
rC.'"IT / •!<"-/! v ",/(_ M(.i/|_ p Mfj/L
-<• 30
. -. u~
! .
", ,
0 ,
? .
C .
'. %
1 .
1 .
i ft
0.
0.
" „
•
? \ C
?70
•^ ^" , •
i 0 • •
i -)."!
i '.:
"•>.;
7 r, j
in>..^
JOO
1 0 'i
-'it.
0 o 0 1 2
0 . C 1 0
; . «'; i ^
j.^G
'• . 0 1 »
,) . 0 u *•
0 .07^
0 ^ •*
0 . 044
••• .00°
r. .030
•.' .015
v .015
0
(.
u
£
0
o
0
0
0
p
y
0
0
.005K
,f>2(!
. C Or
.OO'^K
.00*
. 00^
.00-
. 0 Ti "5
.o?c
.00*
.010
.013
,00'5K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.005'
.030
.015
.015
.010
oOlO
.00^
.015
.020
.035
.010
-------
'S
->'
77-r-r----:~
7?V '•' ' -'
!••' "-.. •< -,
Tl
3? 30.0 0->6 ?7 30. C
Y JIVF-
7.5 ^LE -OLLO/
6L-J "ILL'-'. -;FSV~-
i-S -sELO '..'a1-' AC-HKIM 3 MI E OF CELINA
S 211120^
0000 FEET DE->TH
. ••) .'
T--T-.L
•'•-/L
•'.13-
•• . 1 ?o
; . o n
.i.r.7t-
r. ,04^
.• . 1 3 ^
VoOA-
•!.C3'-
o.o^^
.;.i--*S
T.'J.'S
;:^7i
^r..:, -,-.- i a
L-iTn-;
.-'--./L ^
0 .HUSK
C .OOS">
u.OO^
Co OOP
C.OOSK
: OOOSK
•J . 0 0 o
•j.OOSK
OoOOS
0.005K
or6*i;:;
J^OS-TOT
MG/L o
O.OOSK
0 = 015
U = 010
0.010
O.OOSK
0.005K
0 . J 1 5
0.010
0.010
0.015
OoOO'SK
K VALUE KMOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
DATL
AS2102AA
36 <»1 00.0 065 06 00.0
POG2500*
211-»9 7.3 ALbANY
T/uALc H(JULO« «ES
CtOAri FUt^K dKAfjCH/SPKlrtG C-(Ec.K
11EPALES 2141204
" 0000 FtET DEPTH
u (J 6 3 wp
DATE TIME -DEPTH \02«,,N03
FKJM OF ".'-TOTAL
TO
73/05/01
73/06/01
73/07/03
73/08/01
73/09/04
73/09/29
73/1 1/06
73/12/04
74/01/02
74/01/30
74/U4/02
74/04/30
74/05/30
DAY FEET
09
08
12
09
Ob
09
10
13
06
12
13
22
09
00
30
00
CO
30
30
?0
00
30
00
00
00
30
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
.170
,360
o290
,180
s060
.040
.200
o 52'j
.160
,2dO
o595
ToT fvJtL
M
MG/L
47cOOO
33.600
26.JOO
44oOOO
56,, 000
36.000
36.000
17.000
31.000
21.00U
76.000
33.000
0>610
••in j-m
T'jTAL
Mu/L
I3o200
3.500
3.000
1 1.600
lu.SOO
ItoOOO
1.600
7.400
5.700
15.000
6.700
00671
PnOS-DIb
UPT-iO
lo
1
t!
13
21
1 4
15
14
7
4U
17
L P
.000
.680
.300
.200
.000
.500
.000
.400
.600
.000
.000
00665
KHOb-TOT
50051 50053
FLOsi CONOU1T
KATt FLUo-MGD
MG/L P INST MoD MONTHLY
22.000
24.000
25.000
13.600
27.001)
26.000
16.600
24.UOO
22.000
14.500
55.000
2b.OOO
0.300
0.350
0.350
0.370
0.400
0.400
0.350
0.250
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.350
0.350
Oo300
OoJ33
0.350
0»350
Oo400
0.400
0.350
0.300
Oo350
0.350
0.300
0.350
0.350
------- |