U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                    WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                         REPORT
                                          ON
                                  DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
                               CLINTON AND raERLAND COUNTIES,
                                         AND
                             CLAY, CMEKIOL AND PiCKETL COUNTIES,
                                      EPA REGION IV
                                   WORKING PAPER No, 352
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                             and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
 699-440

-------
                                                REPORT
                                                 ON
                                        DALE HOliOW RESERVOIR
                                   CLINTON AND OjilERL/WD COUNTIES,
                                 CLAY, 0\eTON^ A&PETL COUNTIES,
                                            EPA REGION  IV
                                        WORKING PAPER No, 352
                   WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
                             AND THE
                     KENTUCKY NATIONAL GUARD
                            JUNE, 1977

-------
                                       1

                                   CONTENTS
                                                               Page
  Foreword                                                      ii
  List of Kentucky Reservoirs                                   iv
  Lake and Drainage Area Map                                     v

  Sections
  I.   Conclusions                                                1
 II.   Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics                     4
III.   Lake Water Quality Summary                                 5
 IV.   Nutrient Loadings                                         10
  V.   Literature Reviewed                                       16
 VI.   Appendices                                                17

-------
                                 ii
                          FOREWORD
    The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.

OBJECTIVES

    The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

    The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:

        a.  A generalized representation or model relating
    sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.

        b.  By applying measurements of relevant parameters
    associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
    can be transformed into an operational representation of
    a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.

        c.  With such a transformation, an assessment of the'
    potential for eutrophication control can be made.

LAKE ANALYSIS

    In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented.  The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
                               iii
    Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes.  Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Kentucky Department for
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection for professional
involvement, to the Kentucky National Guard for conducting the
tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to those Kentucky
wastewater treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided
effluent samples.

    Harold Snodgrass, former Director,  and Mercer M.  Peters of
the Division of Water Quality provided invaluable lake documen-
tation and counsel during the Survey; and the staff of the Divis-
ion reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.

    Major General Richard L.  Frymire, the Adjutant General of
Kentucky, and Project Officers Lt.  Colonel Thomas Buyher, Jr.,
and Lt. Colonel  David B.  May, who directed the volunteer efforts
of the Kentucky National  Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknow-
ledged for their assistance to the Survey.

-------
                                 iv
                   NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                          STUDY RESERVOIRS

                          STATE, OF KENTUCKY
NAME
Barkley

Barren River
Cumberland

Dale Hollow
Herrington
Kentucky
COUNTY
Lyon, Trigg, KY;
Cheatham, Montgomery,
Stewart, TN
Allen, Barren
Clinton, Pulaski, Russell,
Wayne
Clinton, Cumberland, !
-------
'Mtylind
Like
DALE   HOLLOW RESERVOIR
   ®      Tributary Sampling Site
   X       Lake  Sampling Site
  *^-^.     Drainage Area Boundary
   f       Sewage Treatment Facility
  :	?       ',°      v       van.
                                   » Ml .
                        Scale
                      85*00 '

-------
                          DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
                             STORE! NO. 2102
I.  CONCLUSIONS
    A.  Trophic Condition:
            Survey data indicate Dale Hollow Reservoir is oligo-
        mesotrophic; i.e., low to moderate supplies of nutrients
        and low to moderate productivity.  Whether nutrient enrich-
        ment is beneficial or deleterious depends on the actual
        or potential effect on the uses of the reservoir.  In this
        regard, personnel of the Kentucky Department for Natural
        Resources and Environmental Protection have indicated
        there is no known impairment of the beneficial uses of
        Dale Hollow Reservoir.
            This water body ranked first in overall trophic quality
        when the five Kentucky reservoirs sampled in 1973 were
        compared using a combination of six parameters*.  None of
        the other reservoirs had less median total phosphorus, dis-
        solved phosphorus, and inorganic nitrogen.  None of the others
        had less mean chlorophyll a_, and none had greater mean Secchi
        disc transparency.  Marked depression of dissolved oxygen
        with depth occurred at all sampling stations in August and
        at stations 1, 2, 3,  and 5 in October.
            Survey limnologists reported some higher aquatic plants
        present in the shallow areas, but otherwise no visible phyto-
* See Appendix A.

-------
                                 2
    plankton or other nuisance conditions were noted.   The water
    was described as "very clear".
        In a summary report (Anonymous, 1976), it is concluded
    that this is an oligotrophic reservoir of outstandingly high
    water quality which supports a fine sports fishery.
B.  Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
        The algal assay results indicate the reservoir was
    phosphorus limited at the times the samples were collected
    (05/18-19/73).  The reservoir data also indicate phosphorus
    limitation; at all sampling times, the mean inorganic nitrogen
    to orthophosphorus ratios were 37 to 1 or greater.
C.  Nutrient Controllability:
        1.  Point sources--The phosphorus contribution of the
    listed point sources amounted to 36.5% of the total input
    to Dale Hollow Reservoir during the sampling year.  The
    Albany, Kentucky  sewage treatment facility supplied 30.9%,
    and the Jamestown, Tennessee  plant contributed an estimated
    5.6% of the total.  The phosphorus loading of 0.35 g/m2/yr
    measured during the sampling year is almost equal  to that
    proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider & Dillon, 1974) as
    an oligotrophic loading (see page 15).  For this reason, all
    phosphorus inputs should be minimized to the greatest possible
    extent to maintain the present high water quality of Dale
    Hollow Reservoir.
        2.  Non-point sources—The phosphorus load from non-point

-------
                                     3
        sources accounted for almost 64% of the total.  The Wolf
        River contributed 26.4%; Spring Creek, 8.6%; the East Fork
        of the Obey River, 7.5%; the West Fork of the Obey River,
        6.5%; and the five remaining listed tributaries collectively
        contributed 6.6% of the total.  The ungaged tributaries
        contributed an estimated 3.0% of the total.
            The phosphorus export rate of Spring Creek was appreciably
        higher than the rates of the other tributaries (see page 14).
        This may have resulted from underestimation of the contribution
        of the Albany wastewater treatment facility or differing land-use
        practices in that drainage.
            Overall, the phosphorus exports rates of the reservoir tribu-
        taries were relatively low (mean of 9.1 kg/km2/yr) and compare
        very well with the export rates of the 19 sampled tributaries
        of nearby Cumberland Lake* (mean of 17.7 kg/km2/yr; range of
        4-38 kg/km2/yr).
* Working Paper No.  351.

-------
II.   RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1

     A.   Morphometry  :

         1.   Surface area:   108.62 kilometers*.

         2.   Mean depth:   14.4 meters.

         3.   Maximum depth:  >36 meters.

         4.   Volume:  1,569.000 x 10s  m3.

         5.   Mean hydraulic retention time:   1.2 years.

     B.   Tributary and Outlet:
         (See Appendix C for flow data)

         1.   Tributaries -


             Name

             Spring Creek
             Sulphur Creek
             111will Creek
             Wolf River
             East Fork,  Obey River
             Big Indian Creek
             Poplar Cove Creek
             West Fork,  Obey River
             Big Eagle Creek
             Minor tributaries &
              immediate drainage -

                         Totals                 2,315.6

         2.   Outlet -

             Obey River                         2,424.2***

     C.   Precipitation****:

         1.   Year of sampling:  188.2 centimeters.

         2.   Mean annual:  138.2 centimeters.
Drainage
area (km2)*
154.6
22.4
133.4
751.1
523.2
35.0
48.7
388.5
117.6
141.1
Mean flow
(m3/sec)*
2.74
0.41
2.43
13.71
10.90
0.73
0.95
5.86
1.74
3.16
                42.63**
                42.63
 t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
 tt At mean elevation of 197.5 m (Moore, 1977).
 * For limits of accuracy,  see Working Paper No.
   1973-1976".
 ** Sum of inflows adjusted to equal  outflow.
 *** Includes area of reservoir.
 **** See Working Paper No.  175.
175, "... Survey Methods,

-------
                                       5
III.   WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
      Dale Hollow Reservoir was sampled three times in 1973 by means
  of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.   Each time,  samples for physi-
  cal  and chemical  parameters were collected from a number of depths
  at six stations on the reservoir (see map, page v).   During each
  visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m  to surface)
  sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identifi-
  cation and enumeration;  and during the first visit,  two 18.9-liter
  depth-integrated samples were composited for algal  assays.  Also
  each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected  from each of the
  stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis.  The maximum depths sampled
  were 34.1  meters at station 1, 36.0 meters at station 2, 29.9 meters
  at station 3,  17.1  meters at station 4, 21.6 meters  at station 5,
  and  12.2 meters at station 6.
      The sampling results are presented in full  in Appendix D and
  are  summarized in the following table.

-------
PARAMETER

TEMP (C)

OISS OXY 

CNDCTVY (MCROMO)

PH (STAND UNITS)

TOT ALK (MG/L)

TOT P (MG/L)

ORTHO P (MG/L)

N02+N03 (MG/L)

AMMONIA (MG/L)

KJEL N  (MG/L)

INORG N (MG/L)

TOTAL N (MG/L)

CHLRPYL A (UG/L)

SECCHI  (METERS)
                             A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND


                             1ST SAMPLING  ( 5/18/73)

                                   6 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS F04 DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
 STORET CODE 2102
           2ND SAMPLING ( 8/18/73)

                 6 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (10/24/73)

      6 SITES
RANGE
10.1
4.3
oee««
7.5
36.
0.005
0.002
0.190
0.020
0.200
0.210
0.390
0.6
1.5
- 18.9
- 10.4
-o«»«e«a<
8.1
85.
- 0.048
- 0.010
- 0.380
- 0.060
- 0.400
- 0.420
- 0.710
8.4
- 11.0
MEAN
15.6
8.8
nnn»«»«ytn
7.8
61.
0.012
0.003
0.271
0.035
0.250
0.306
0.521
2.9
6.4
MEDIAN
15.9
9.1
HHHKHJO
7.8
62.
0.010
0.002
0.280
0.030
0.200
0.300
0.505
1.0
5.9
RANGE
10.5
0.2
124.
6.2
52.
0.009
0.003
0.040
0.030
0.200
0.070
0.360
2.5
1.1
- 29.7
- 10.6
- 270.
7.8
97.
- 0.030
- 0.016
- 0.460
- 0.280
- 0.700
- 0.560
- 0.830
- 13.2
5.7
MEAN
22.3
4.8
172.
6.9
67.
0.014
0.008
0.211
0.081
0.384
0.292
0.595
6.4
3.2
MEDIAN
23.1
4.8
183.
6.8
64.
0.013
0.007
0.195
0.055
0.400
0.305
0.570
5.5
3.2
RANGE
11.0
0.6
132.
7.0
50.
0.004
0.003
0.020
0.030
0.200
0.070
0.220
0.6
1.7
- 21.8
8.0
- 290.
7.9
98.
- 0.022
- 0.010
- 0.310
- 0.740
- 0.900
- 0.770
- 1.100
2.2
5.8
MEAN
19.2
5.0
174.
7.4
66.
0.009
0.005
0.077
0.115
0.285
0.192
0.362
1.4
3.4
MEDIAI
20.7
6o5
169.
7.5
64.
0.008
0.005
0.050
0.060
0.200
0.115
0.260
1.4
3.1

-------
B.  Biological Characteristics:

    1.  Phytoplankton -
        Sampli ng
        Date

        05/18-19/73
        08/18/73
        10/24/73
    2.  Chlorophyll a, -

        Sampli ng
        Date

        05/18-19/73
Dominant
Genera

1.  Flagellates
2.  Dinobryon sp.
3.  Asterionella sp.
4.  Cyclotella sp.
5.  Fragilaria ^p_.
    Other genera

            Total

1.  Anomoeoneis sp.
2.  Cyclotella ^p_.
3.  Flagellates
4.  Dinoflagellates
5.  Asterionella sp.
    Other genera

            Total
1.  Flagellates
2.  Synedra sp.
    Anomoeoneis sp.
    Spherical cells
    Achnanthes sp.
    Other genera

            Total
Station
Number

   1
   2
   3
   4
   5
   6
    Algal Units
    per ml	

       112
        73
        15
        10
         5
        66

       281

       817
        83
        71
        71
        59
       189
     1,290

       447
        49
        49
        49
        26
        38

       658
Chlorophyll a_
     0.7
     0.6
     0.8
     1.2
     5.9
     8.4

-------
                                 8
Sampl i ng
Date
08/18/73





10/24/73





Station
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
                                                         Chlorophyll a^
                                                         (yg/1)

                                                              3.3
                                                              2.5
                                                              2.6
                                                              9.1
                                                              7.7
                                                             13.2

                                                              1.5
                                                              1.4
                                                              0.9
                                                              2.1
                                                              0.6
                                                              2.2
C.   Limiting Nutrient Study:

    1.  Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -

        a.  Stations 1, 2, and 3 -
                         Ortho P
                         Cone, (mg/1)
Spike (mg/1)

Control
 0.050 P
 0.050 P + 1.0 N
 1.0 N
        b.  Stations 4, 5, and 6 -
Inorganic N
Cone,  (rng/1)
                                                 Maximum yield
                                                 (mg/l-dry wt.)
0.016
0.066
0.066
0.016
0.256
0.256
1.256
1.256
0.1
6.3
18.8
0.1
                         Ortho P
                         Cone, (mg/1)
                                  Inorganic N
                                  Cone, (mg/1)
               Maximum yield
               (nig/1-dry wt.)
Spike (mg/1)

Control
 0.050 P
 0.050 P + 1.0 N
 1.0 N
        Discussion -

            The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-

        cornutum, indicate that the potential  primary productivity
0.004
0.054
0.054
0.004
0.294
0.294
1.294
1.294
0.1
3.4
10.0
0.1

-------
                         9
of Dale Hollow Reservoir was low at the times the assay
samples were collected (05/18-19/73).   Also, the increased
yields when phosphorus alone was added indicate phosphorus
limitation.  Note that the addition of nitrogen alone did
not result in increased yields.
    The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at
all sampling times.  The mean inorganic nitrogen to
orthophosphorus ratios were 37 to 1 or greater at all
sampling times, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.

-------
                                      10
IV.   NUTRIENT LOADINGS
     (See Appendix E for data)
     For the determination of nutrient loadings,  the Kentucky and
 Tennessee National  Guards collected monthly near-surface grab samples
 from each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except
 for the months of January and February when two  samples  were collected  at
 many of the sites.   Sampling was begun in April,  1973, and  was completed
 in March, 1974.
     Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
 year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided  by
 the Kentucky District Office of the U.S.  Geological  Survey  for the
 tributary sites nearest the lake.
     In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries  were
 determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological  Survey computer
 program for calculating stream loadings*.  Nutrient loads shown are
 those measured minus point-source loads,  if any.
     Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and  immediate
 drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
 nutrient exports, in kg/km2/year, at stations B-l,  C-l,  D-l, F-l,
 G-l, H-l, and J-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area  in km2.
     The operator of the Albany, Kentucky wastewater treatment plant
 provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. The
 operator of Jamestown, Tennessee wastewater treatment plant did not
 participate in the sampling program, and nutrient loads  were esti-
 mated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
   See Working Paper No.  175.

-------
                                     11

    A.  Waste Sources:

        1.  Known municipal -

                        Pop.                  Mean Flow      Receiving
        Name            Served    Treatment   (m3/d)         Water

        Albany, KY      2,500f    Imhoff tank   1,288.0      Cedar Fk./
                                                              Spring Cr.
        Jamestown, TN   1,898*    Imhoff tank     718.4**    Rock Castle Cr./
                                                              E. Fk., Obey R.

        2.  Known industrial - None
t Treatment plant questionnaire.
* 1970 Census.
** Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.

-------
                                     12

    B.  Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:

        1.  Inputs -

                                              kg P/          % of
            Source                            y_r	          total

            a.  Tributaries  (non-point load) -

                Spring Creek                   3,290          8.6
                Sulphur Creek                    195          0.5
                Illwill Creek                    825          2.2
                Wolf River                    10,100         26.4
                East Fork, Obey River          2,850          7.5
                Big Indian Creek                 280          0.7
                Poplar Cove Creek                340          0.9
                West Fork, Obey River          2,465          6.5
                Big Eagle Creek                  870          2.3

            b.  Minor tributaries &  immediate
                 drainage (non-point load) -   1,130          3.0

            c.  Known municipal STP's -

                Albany, KY                    11,790         30.9
                Jamestown, TN                  2,150          5.6

            d.  Septic tanks* -                   10         <0.1

            e.  Known industrial - None

            f.  Direct precipitation** -       1,900          5.0

                        Total                 38,195        100.0

        2.  Outputs -

            Reservoir outlet - Obey  River     13,085

        3.  Net annual P accumulation - 25,110 kg.
* Estimate based on 29 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
                                     13


    C.  Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:

        1.  Inputs -

                                              kg N/          % of
            Source                            yr             total
            a.  Tributaries (non-point load) -

                Spring Creek                  102,165          7.8
                Sulphur Creek                  11,375          0.9
                Illwill Creek                 103,185          7.9
                Wolf River                    330,745         25.3
                East Fork, Obey River         297,695         22.8
                Big Indian Creek               15,155          1.2
                Poplar Cove Creek              36,215          2.8
                West Fork, Obey River         125,850          9.6
                Big Eagle Creek                65,505          5.0

            b.  Minor tributaries & immediate
                 drainage (non-point load) -   76,195          5.8

            c.  Known municipal STP's -

                Albany, KY                     18,660          1.4
                Jamestown, TN                   6,455          0.5

            d.  Septic tanks* -                   310         *0.1

            e.  Known industrial - None

            f.  Direct precipitation** -      117,265          9.0

                           Total            1,306,775        100.0

        2.  Outputs -

            Reservoir outlet - Obey River   2,585,010

        3.  Net annual  N loss - 1,278,235 kg.
* Estimate based on 29 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No.  175.
** See Working Paper No.  175.

-------
                                 14


D.   Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:

    Tributary                             kg P/km2/yr    kg  N/km2/yr

    Spring Creek                              21              661
    Sulphur Creek                              9              508
    111will Creek                              6              774
    Wolf River                                13              440
    East Fork, Obey River                      5              569
    Big Indian Creek                           8              433
    Poplar Cove Creek                          7              744
    West Fork, Obey River                      6              324
    Big Eagle Creek                            7              557

-------
                                     15
    E.  Yearly Loads:
            In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
        are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
        and Dillon, 1974).  Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
        one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
        remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
        would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
        or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted.  A meso-
        trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
        and "permissible".
            Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
        water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
                                  Total Phosphorus       Total Nitrogen
        	Total   Accumulated    Total   Accumulated
        grams/m2/yr             0.35       0.23        12.0       loss*
        Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
         (g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
         hydraulic retention time of Dale Hollow Reservoir:
            "Dangerous"  (eutrophic loading)                 0.68
            "Permissible"  (oligotrophic loading)            0.34
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year.   This
  may have been due to nitrogen fixation in the lake, solubilization of
  previously sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water,
  or unknown and unsampled point sources discharging directly to the lake.
  Whatever the cause,  a similar nitrogen loss has occurred at Shagawa Lake,
  Minnesota, which has been intensively studied by EPA's former National
  Eutrophication and Lake Restoration Branch (Malueg et al., 1975).

-------
                                 16

LITERATURE REVIEWED

Anonymous, 1976.  Water quality conditions in Dale Hollow Lake.
    Nashville Distr., U.S. Corps of Engineers, Nashville, TN.

Malueg, Kenneth W., D. Phillips Larsen, Donald W. Schults, and
    Howard T. Mercier; 1975.  A six-year water, phosphorus, and
    nitrogen budget for Shagawa Lake, Minnesota.  Jour. Environ.
    Qual., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 236-242.

Moore, E. C., 1977.  Personal communication  (reservoir morphometry).
    Engr. Divn., Nashville Distr., U.S. Corps of Engineers, Nashville,
    TN.

Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974.  The application of
    the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
    Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
    for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.

-------
VI.   APPENDICES
                                   17
                                  APPENDIX A
                                  LAKE RANKINGS

-------
LA*t DATA TO BE USEU  IN

LA
-------
        OF LAKES  *1TM  HIGHLK VALUES

LAKE
COiJt  LAKE NAME

2101  LAKE CUMStKLANU

3102  UALE HOLLO*  KESEHVOIW

21l)J  Ht^INGFUN  LAiVt

2104  KENTUCKY LAKE

2*05  BARKEN RIVER KESEKVOIR
MEUl AN
TOTAL
60 (
8U (
U (
20 (
40 (
P
3)
4)
0)
1)
2)
MtDIAN
INOKG
60 (
60 (
0 (
20 (
40 (

N
3)
4)
0)
1)
2>
bOO-
MEAN
MEAN SEC
60 (
bO (
40 (
0 (
20 (
3)
4)
2)
0)
1)
CriLOHA
60 (
80 (
0 (
20 (
40 (
3»
4)
0)
1)
2)
15-
MlN
20 (
60 (
20 (
80 (
20 (
MEDIAN
00
0)
3)
0)
4)
0)
DISS
40 (
80 (
0 (
20 i
60 (
P
2>
4)
0)
1)
3)
INI
NO
3(
4(

It
21

-------
                                                                                                    —«•» -**~±1
LAKES RANKED HY INJE* NOb.
WANK  LAKE CUUE  LAKE, NAME                IUDEA  NO
   t  2102       UALE HOLLUrt HEbEHVOIH
   2  2101    '   LAKE CUMBERLAND             300
   3  2lub       dAHKEN HIv/Ert  KESEHVOIH      220
   <»  2104       KENIUCKY LAKE              160
   b  2103       HENH1NGTON  LAKE              60

-------
    APPENDIX B





CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
                CONVERSION FACTORS




Hectares x 2.471 = acres



Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles



Meters x 3.281 = feet


                         -4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10   = acre/feet



Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles



Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec



Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches

  4

Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds



Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile

-------
    APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
                                   TSitiUTAhir FLO* INFORMATION FOR KENTuCKr
CODE 2102

TOTAL
                   DALE HOLLOw
                    OF LAKEISQ KM)
                                          242*.
TRIBUTARY  A9EA(SJ
                          JAN
                                  FEB
                                                  APR
              NORMALISED FLOWS(CMb)
        MAY      JUN     JUL      AUG      SEP     OCT
                                                                                                     NOV
                                                                          DEC
                                                                   SUMMARY
                   TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
                   SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS   =
                                                         2319.5
                                      TOTAL FLOW IN  =    511.55
                                      TOTAL FLOW OUT =    512.11
     MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)

TRIBUTARY   MONTH   YEAR    MEAN FLOW  DAY
                                              FLOW  DAY
2102A1
2102tU
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
73
73
73
73
73
n
73
73
73
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
                            4.02
                            6.74
                            3.43
                            2.62
                            0.49
                            0.17
                            0.10
                            4.87
                            5.38
                           12.60
                            5.41
                            5.95
                            0.58
                            0.97
                            0.50
                            0.38
                            0.07
                            0.03
                            0.01
                            0.71
                            0.78
                            1.83
                            0.78
                            0.86
 1

17
22
19
16
14
18

 5
 2
17
 1

17
22
19
16
14
18

 5
 2
17
29
 3.88

 4.02
 0.51
 0.30
 0.15
 0.10
 0.34
 9.23   20
14.64   17
 3.51
 0.56   29

 0.58
 0.07
 0.05
 0.02
 0.01
 0.05

 1.34   20
 2.12   17
 0.51
FLOW  DAY

6.51
                                               FLOw
           2.28
           2.59

           0.93
                                                                     0.32
                                                                     0.37
                                                                                                                    MEAN
21U2A1
2102B1
2102CI
2i020i
2102E1
2102F1
2102G1
2102H1
2102J1
2102K1
21022Z
15^.6
22.4
133.4
751.1
523.2
35.0
48.7
388.5
117.6
2424.2
145.0
S.6b
0.62
4.9U
27.52
21.86
1.46
i.91
12.01
3.34
48.9*
5.66
6. MO
0.99
5.46
33.13
26.14
1.75
2.29
14.67
4.02
50.40
6.82
6.63
0.96
5,72
32. 2d
25.17
1.68
2.21
14.27
4.16
63.15
6.60
4.08
0.5Q
3.54
19.08
16.00
1.07
1.39
8.61
2.64
67.96
4.13
2.16
0.31
1.87
10.51
9.32
0.62
0.78
4.47
1.38
46.44
2.32
1.54
0.22
1.33
7.<»8
4.7U
0.31
0.46
2.51
0.96
39.64
1.36
0.10
0.15
0.90
5.10
3.62
0.24
0.33
1.91
O.d2
37.38
0.98
0.39
0.06
0.33
1.69
1.80
0.12
0.14
0.98
0.45
41.63
0.43
0.<*6
0.07
0.39
2.22
1.87
0.13
0.16
0.93
0.40
32.56
0.48
0.37
0.05
0.32
1.81
1.63
0.11
0.13
0.72
0.27
25.29
0.40
1.52
0.22
1.31
7.39
6.14
0.41
0.52
2.97
0.76
23.84
1.55
3.43
0.50
2.94
16.59
13.54
0.91
1.17
6.85
1.85
34.83
3.48
2.74
0.41
2.43
13.71
10V90
0.>3
0.95
5.86
1.74
42.63
2.83

-------
                                    T9J6UTAHY  f-LO* IMFOKMATION FU* K£NIJC
-------
                                    TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FGS  KENTUCKY
                                                                                            a/3/75
LA



TKlbUTAr
-------
                                   TRIBUTARY Ft_0w  INFORMATION  FOK  KENTUCKY
                                                                                           2/3/75
LA
-------
        APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STCMET RETRIEVAL CUTE 7b/01/27
                                                                  210201
                                                                 36 32 23.0 085 26 49.0
                                                                 DALE HOLLO*
                                                                 21      KENTUCKY
DATE
TO
73/05/18






73/08/18








73/10/24






OOOlU
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
09
09
09
Ov
09
Ov
09
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
0000
0006
0015
0035
0050
0075
0100
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0100
0112
0000
0010
0035
0045
0050
0080
0111
CENT
17.9
17.9
17.9
15.6
12.8
11.9
11.0
28.3
28.2
26.4
20.8
17.5
14.8
13.0
11.7
10. 5
21.6
21.5
21.4
21.4
19.2
14.8
11.0
11EPALES

00300
DO

MG/L

9.4
9.8
10.4
10.3
9.6
9.1

8.6
10.6
9.2
6.2
4.b
4.0
2.0
1.6

7.8
7.9
7.4
3.0
1.0
0.9

00077 00094
T*ANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHl FIELD
INCHES MICtfOMHO
432 198
188
188
192
193
190
190
144 181
185
180
160
135
127
132
142
148
180 160
160
160
160
143
132
145
3
00400
PH

SU
7.90
8.00
8.10
8.00
8.00
7.9U
7.80
7.50
7.40
7.10
6.90
6.60
6.50
6.30
6.30
. 6.20
7.90
7.90
7.80
7.60
7.20
7.10
7.10

00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
65
65
63
63
61
63
63
61
60
60
61
54
55
61
64
66
59
62
62
61
57
62
77
211
0104
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.070
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.080
1202


FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.600
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
0.20 OK
0.200K
0.800
0.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.190
0.190
0.190
0.200
0.240
0.260
0.290
0.080
0.060
0.150
0.220
0.270
0.350
0.360
0.360
0.340
0.060
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.290
0.300
0.110
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.003
0.010
0.003
0.005
0.005
0.008
0.011
0.010
0.007
0.013
0.010
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.004
0.009
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.006
                    K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
                    LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
               DATE
                    00665
OATE   TIME DEPTn PnOS-TOT
FROM    OF
 TO    DAY  FEET   M.G/L f
73/05/18






73/08/18








73/10/24






09
09
09
09
09
09
09
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
0000
0006
0015
0035
0050
0075
0100
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0100
0112
0000
0010
0035
0045
0050
0080
0111
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
j
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
.010
.009
.009
.012
.010
.006
.008
.012
.018
.014
.011
.012
.011
.018
.011
.015
.007
.009
.008
.008
.007
.008
.012
  32217
CHLRPHYL
   A
  UG/L

     0.7
                                 3.3
                                 l.S
                                                                210201
                                                               36 32 23.0 085 26 49.0
                                                               DALE HULLO* RESERVOIR
                                                               21      KENTUCKY
                                                               11EPAL£S
                                                               3
                                                        2111202
                                                       0104 FEET
DEPTH

-------
ET KETRIEVAL OATt 75/01/27
                                                              £10202
                                                             36 33 42.0 065 23 04.0
                                                             DALE HOLLOW RESERVOIR
                                                             21      KENTUCKY"
00010
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/18






73/08/18






73/10/24






TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
13
13
13


50
50
50
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
DEPTH

FEET
0000
0006
0015
0040
0065
0090
0118
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0086
0000
0010
0035
0045
0055
0080
0111
HATER
TEMP
CENT
18
18
18
14
12
11
10
29
28
27
20
17
15
12
21
21
21
21
18
14
11



.3
.3
. 1
.8
.1
.2
.1
.1
.4
.5
.9
.6
.5
.7
.8
.7
.5
.1
.4
.7
.2
11EPALES

C0300
DO

MG/L

8.7
9.8
1C.O
9.0
9.0
7.5


8.0
7.8
5.0
2.2
2.0

7.4
7.0
4.8
0.8
0.8
0.8

00077 00094
TKANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICHOMHO
369 196
181
181
180
198
192
198
226 186
184
183
152
130
124
131
228 163
162
163
153
147
150
152
3
00400
PH

SU
7.90
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.90
7.70
7.70
7.30
7.30
6.90
6.50
6.30
6.20
6.30
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.20
7.10
7.10
7.10

00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
62
62
62
61
60
60
64
62
62
62
58
52
58
71
55
53
52
53
50
61
80
2111202
0122
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.180
0.300
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.240
0.240
0.250
0.280
0.310
0.310
0.300
0.140
0.200
0.190
0.260
0.270
0.340
0.410
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.120
0.310
0.030
0.040
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTriO
MG/L P
0.002K
0.003
0.009
0.002K
0.002K
0.002
0.002
0.006
0.009
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.016
0.006
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.008
         K  VALUE  KNOWN  TO BE
         LESS  THAN  INDICATED

-------
STO*£T wtTRIEVAL DATE 7D/01/27
  DATE
  FROM
   TO

73/05/18
73/U8/18
73/10/24

TIME
OF
DAY
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 ^0
14 40
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50
13 50

DEPTH

FEET
0000
0006
0015
0040
0065
0090
Olid
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0086
0000
0010
0035
0045
0055
0080
0111
00665
PrtOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.006
0.011
0.048
0.011
0.009
0.010
U.009
0.009
0.009
0.013
0.020
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.008
0.013
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
OG/L
0.6






2.5






1.4






                                                                  210202
                                                                 36 33 42.0 085 23 04.0
                                                                 UALE rIOLLO* RESERVOIx
                                                                 21      KENTUCKY
                                                                 11EPALES
                                                                 3
 2111202
0122 FEET
DEPTH

-------
                                             210,203
                                            36 36 55.0 085 17 57.0
                                            DALE HOLLO* RESERVOIR
                                            21      KENTUCKY
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/18






73/08/18







73/10/24





00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TtMP
DAY FEET
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
58
58
58
58
58
58
0000
0006
0015
0035
0055
0075
0098
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0095
0000
0010
0030
0045
0060
0089
CENT
18.
18.
18.
15.
12.
11.
11.
29.
28.
27.
20.
17.
14.
13.
12.
21.
21.
21.
21.
17.
13.

3
2
0
a
6
9
0
3
5
0
3
4
9
1
3
4
3
3
0
7
5
00300
DO
MG/L

9.
9.
9.
8.
8.
7.

8.
6.
2.
I.
0.
0.
0.

7.
6.
6.
0.
0.



4
6
1
6
4
8

2
0
6
8
8
2
8

0
8
0
6
6
11EPALES

00300
00

MG/L

9.*
9.6
9.1
8.6
8.4
7.8

8.2
6.0
2.6
1.8
0.8
0.2
0.8

7.0
6.8
6.0
0.6
0.6

00077 0009"*
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
288 181
180
179
181
182
181
190
144 189
186
193
167
1*8
160
163
150
156 167
167
168
170
172
173
3
00400
PH

SU
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.90
7.80
7.70
7.70
7.30
7.20
6.70
6.50
6.30
6.20
6.20
6.20
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.20
7.00
7.00

00410
T AL*
CAC03
MG/L
60
59
59
56
56
61
63
59
59
63
64
62
83
89
85
61
59
60
60
79
86
2111202
0102
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.100
0.060
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.160
0.240
0.270
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.360
0.740
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.600
0.600
0.300
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
0.900
00630
N02kN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.280
0.280
0.280
0.270
0.320
0.340
0.320
0.230
0.150
0.180
0.460
0.380
0.300
0.060
0.130
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.020
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.003
0.008
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.011
0.007
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.006
0.012
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.006
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
iTOKtT *t.Tr
-------
5TOP.ET ^ETrUEVAL DATt 75/01/27
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/05/18






73/06/18







73/10/24





00665 32217
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT OLRPHfL
OF A
OAr FEET
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
58
58
58
58
58
58
0000
0006
0015
0035
0055
0075
0098
0000
0005
0025
0040
0055
0070
0085
0095
0000
0010
0030
0045
0060
0089
MG/L P
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.010
0.009
0.011
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.010
U.011
0.009
0.011
0.015
0.013
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.009
UG/L
0.8






2.6







0.9





                                                                   210203
                                                                  3b 36 55.0 085  17 57.0
                                                                  DALE HOULOw
                                                                  21      KE.-iTUOY
                                                                  11EPALES
                                                                  3
 2111202
0102 FtET
DEPTH

-------
*ET*IttfAL OATr 75/01/2?
                                                           310205
                                                          36 31 03.0 065 11 58.0
                                                          OALE HOLLO* RESERVOIK
                                                          21      KENTUCKY

DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19





73/08/18




73/10/24





DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19





73/08/ld




73/10/24





TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 00 0000
13 00 0006
13 00 0015
13 00 0035
13 00 0050
13 00 0071
18 00 0000
18 00 0005
18 00 0020
13 00 0030
18 00 0045
10 25 0000
10 25 0010
10 25 0020
10 25 0050
10 25 0062

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 00 0000
13 00 0006
13 00 0015
13 00 0035
13 00 OU50
13 00 0071
18 00 0000
18 00 0005
18 00 0020
18 00 0030
18 00 0045
10 25 0000
10 25 0010
10 2S 0020
10 25 0050
10 25 0062
00010
nATER
TEMP
CENT
18.7
18.5
18.4
15.2
13.3
12.3
29.4
29.3
27,8
24.1
18.8
20.9
20.9
20.9
20.4
17.7
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.017
0.007
0.006
0.013
0.013
0.016
0.016
0.019
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.012
0.013
00300
DO

MG/L

9.2
8.6
8.6
8.0
7.8

8.6
7.0
4.8
3.0

7.0
7.0
5.2
1.4
32217
CrtLRPHYL
A
UG/L
5.9





7.7




0.6




                                   00077     000*4
                                  TRANSP   CNDUCTVY
                                  SECCHI   FIELD
                                  INCHES   M1CKOMHO
                                      180
                                       86
                                       84
180
180
160
150
180
iao
185
183
182
190
148
172
171
172
186
194
11EPALES
3
00400
PH

SO
7.80
8.00
7.60
7.60
7.50
7.50
7.70
7.50
6.80
6. 50
6.50
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.20
7.10

00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
47
46
44
39
62
64
66
64
68
63
66
64
65
64
66
66
211
0075
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.070
0.050
0.040
0.070
0.060
0.070
0.100
0.5dO
1202


FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.700
0.400
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.800
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.260
0.230
0.230
0.220
0.310
0.310
0.120
0.090
0.220
0.310
0.310
0.050
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.020
00671
PnOS-DIS
ORTrtO
MG/L P
0.002
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.010
0.007
0.010
0.007
0.007
0.003
0.005
0.004
0.006
0.010
             K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
             LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORE: *ETKIE\/AL DATE 75/01/27
                                                                   210206
                                                                  36  27  02.0  085  07  05.0
                                                                  DALE HOLLO*  RESEKVOIK
                                                                  21       KENTUCKY
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19




73/08/18



73/10/24



U0010
HME OEaTrt WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET CENT
13
13
13
13
13
18
18
18
18
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
35
25
25
25
05
05
05
05
0000
0006
0015
0025
0040
0000
0005
0015
0035
0000
0005
0015
0027
18.8
18.2
16.1
15.2
14.9
29.7
28.2
27.1
22.2
18.6
18.8
18.0
17.0
                                00300      OC077      OOOS»<+
                                 DO       TRANSP   CNDUCTVY
                                          SECCHI   FIELD
                                MG/L      INCHES   MICROMMO
                                   9.6
                                   9.4
                                   9.4
                                   9.2

                                   8.8
                                   4.6
                                   1.3

                                   8.0
                                   7.0
                                   7.0
                                               60
42
65
175
170
180
190
180
188
186
204
270
204
206
290
256
11EHALES
4
00400
PH

SO
7.70
7.80
7.70
7.60
7.70
7.50
7.>»0
6.90
7.50
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.50

00<»10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
48
47
37
36
80
68
67
72
76
67
64
81
98
211
0044
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.050
0.080
0.280
0.120
0.100
0.100
0.100
1202


FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.500
0.400
0.200K
0.200K
U.200K
00630
N02<»N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.190
0.190
0.210
0.220
0.320
0.070
0.050
0.080
0.180
0.090
0.070
0.180
0.100
00671
PrfOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002
0.003
0.012
0.006
0.011
0.009
0.003
0.005
0.004
                      00665     32217
  DATE   TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT  CHLRPHYL
  FROM    OF                     A
   TO    DAY  FEET   MG/L P     UG/L

73/05/19 13 50 0000    0.010       8.4
         13 50 0006    0.009
         13 50 0015    0.005
         13 50 0025    0.006
         13 50 0040    0.010
73/08/18 18 25 0000    0.016      13.2
         18 25 0005    0.015
         18 25 0015    0.016
         18 25 0035    0.022
73/10/24 10 05 0000    0.019       2.2
         10 05 0005    0.010
         10 05 0015    0.009
         10 05 0027    0.013
                             * VALUE KNOWN TO BE
                             LESS THAN I.MDICATEO

-------
       APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
  TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
                                                    21.241           LS2102M
                                                   36 3f, 00.0 085  0«J  30.0
                                                   •3-t'jj CK-I ->u .5 MI .\w  LOCUST 33UVE SCHOOL
                                                   MERLES              3111204
                                                   4                     0000  FEET  DEPTH
QATt
TRQM
TI«F 0£JT-. ••iO?s':r.2 Ti>f
OF *i-r.n.j|_ \
Tr< OAl FtfT
73/04/01
73/04/23
73/06/17
73/07/??
73/0 V 13
73/09/16
"'3/10/1^
73/11/I3
7^/01/05
74/01/?0
74/02/0?
74/)?/17
74/)3/l 7
10
1C
10
10
09
08
09
16
1*
10
10
1C
10
00
?0
20
05
45
30
^0
40
Ct
?0
45
30
'5
MT-
',
J
rt
3
Q
;>
0
i:
1
1
0
0
0
/I
.700
.470
.890
.6-^0
.630
.590
.37-i
.5^
. 1=^
.0^0
.770
.770
» ' j -J i •
ff\
v
0
0
0
2
0
c>
n
•,
0
•y
0
[J
~ •> :

\>
/L
.020
.010
. 0 3 •*
.0?9
.072
.Ov3
.OC5^
.01^
.03J
.OlJ
.12^
.070
.030
•••••-71 00665
-"'-•'•5-0 is PMOS-TOT
•J-T'-'O
"C-/L P
: . o 1 2
C-.005K
0 . 0 1 ft
0.273
0.300
0 . 350
.'.37H
0.240
1.005
.'.025
C . 0 1 0
:.015
. .03?
WG/
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
L P
.050
.045
.055
.400
.345
..3«0
«42u
.275
.060
.025

.035
.040
". VSLUr K 10 . .'
LESS
               TO

-------
          Ti"-
          1 " DC
7V07/?? 0-i iC

71/09/1- o-» rr
7VIC/l^t vi ••> '. r
7 V 1 1 / 1 6 10 r-f
7^/(! I/QS lr, "10
74/n?/o? 10 ro

7A/C3/17 0^ ^5
                       I-T





'••••:- -•.-••'
rrr.ii.
C-/L ^~/L
0.170 O.C33
0 . 1 0 11 *• 0 . • l ^
') • ° •• i u.vl'j
0. 1 7U 0.01.'
•j.?»i 0.05M
'.11- ...C'^7
j . '.-r ''. ., i^
o .-•?!. ; .•, s-+
•',")' 1-.010
0 . lUl r. .1 .C051-:
'.°0., j.170
:.-r;.J ->..lst;
1.^0", -..vv1-





"• '• 5 7 I
"i^THO
i/r./L ^
O.OC5<
O.OO^K
n.006
0.010
i'. .007
o.013
, .011
0.00-
n.oob
0.005
j.020
'j .Oi15<
o.OOS^





> -'"'


0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
3^ ~i- 00.: Oe5 12 00.0
•i JL--U0 C^EE^
:! ?.-> itdANY . KI -TN
i/-i^'..£ '-.uLOv "Ebv-
lH->-»LFS 21112
<- 0000 F
^5

L 3
.015
.015
.020
.015
.015
.0 IS
.U2S
.0 35
.010
.005*

.010
.005K
                                                                                                           55
                      K v/fiLUE  KNO»i\  T'j dc.
                      LESS  Tr-JN INOIC.jT£j

-------
                                                          ^  '--  30. ,  0-5  14.  00.'J
                                                          ,LL' ILL  C-I-.L*
                                                          -' i         '. "•  ifr A".'v . -' r-1
                                                           /  _!_£  - ._._ ;•,.  jc-<;y_
                                                          .'• S F  -1.-G.':   ^G'.-niC"'  C-'cE
~PO'-'
TO
73/0^/01
7^/Pft/l 7
73/37/P5
73/93/1-
7T/G'-»/lS
7V 10/1*
73/11/1*
7^/01/0=
7/i/3 1/?3
7&/0?/0?
7^/0.?/l7
7&/OVI7
0?
->a» rP^T
1= no
0s, ~C
fi-j ?7
J? lc
09 30
i'- ^-~
•jn ts
1^ IS
»i° Sh
11 30
-1^. ?0
CJ ^0
,-(-'f.M_
'••i:/L v '/I
^.3 7 "i C.'^u
.>.op.i C-.? = u
" . 3 1. o ri . ? 1 0
1 . ~< c .' «• . - j '.
i' . 3 C 1 . 1 5 J
•,'.u r v o.'--.v.
./.'Mr- C.-'.''
i.l . • C."'r
•^ . 7 « : : . i u v K
C.^-.i I.5-''''
O.S?:- ?.?OC
"•.S.,- O.-O','
r ; r -v. L
•' j/L
.!.Pfci.
0 . 0 ° c
•: .on
'j . 0 6 ^
:) . ??'•)
• ' . •-' j t
' .• . J 3 5
,'! . C: •) ~-~
J.COSK
• j . 0 6 r>
C.02?
0. ! ?0
^ r
.^r-/
P
ii
';
•j
0
D
0
")
0

^
u
-iO
L P
.005<
.OOS^
.OOSK
.OOSrt
.005^
. 0 0 ft
.OO^K
.OOS
.005K

.OOSK
. 0 0 SK

MG/
0
0
C
u
0
0
0
0
o

0
0

^ J
. o i ;••
.010
.DOS*
.015
.01 =
. 0 1 \.
. 0 1 ij
.010
.ouS1^

.oos
.005A
K VALUE  KNOwM  TO
LESS THiN
                                                                                 oooo FEET

-------
  DtTF    T:-?  )-"   ••;•.•,;.    T  7  .,--_    •	•..     -_.•>•;_.-!!<.  .
  r= jv     .)c          -i n ; .                 ^7 •!       O-T-C
                                                         -.F$V->
                                                                                 -_. -,:?.- '••! rti*.  .IF SI  ATIC
                                                                                                2111?0<«
                                                                                                oooo
                                                                       0.010
          i' -^           -:.3-..v      o.?"-'.      ?.-:u     o.jii      c.o?c
          ! T 1^           ••.3-7      '.•i-^'"      '..;''?"'     'LOC5K     0.01U
73/Q7/11  1? ^!>           L .H- i      j.^-.,-      O.-Mt     'l.OOo      0.0*0

          1's I".           '- . J ' '      •:..-'.•'.•       -..*••     J.O'-'      O.u3^
73/10/1-  !1 30           ..^-3-.      1.3C-      v.,^'     ?.''!?      O.O^S
73/11/1-.  lr. C1"           ...--''      i.l-j      -..•..^     i,. 020      0.035
7T/1 ?/2o  iO :>0           •-.--'•      ".'O:      ••.-,'?'•     ';.012      J.OJ5
7'./0!/lt  II 3°           I-.'1"      „• .ITU-C     'LCI;1     'LOOP      0.010
          1? 00           '-.4JC      '.v.30y      O.r;!^     n..005K     0.016
          i' is           . .3.?^      I.K'^     •;.:•?•)     C'.OOSK     u.ois
                                                           ',' . 0 10      0.010
              K  VALUE KNOWN TO BE
              LESS THAN  INDICATED

-------
                                                                      •- ^S OO.o
                                                                                    ? 01 30.0
   'C'-/li  li  "JO
73/05/0=  11  C%
73/0^/OJ  I2'  =•"
7T/07/11  1C  '-.0
73/Oa/l^  11  .  V*
73/1;
7fc/0 I/ 1s:.
7^/0 --VO-
13
K-
             3"
                            1 '•
             or.
• - L
•'-.-/L
i .?•••:
• • "' ^ o
r . ^- ^.0
i.' . - °V
'. . 1 " • - K
> . i .! V •
! L 1 -'
'.-•}.'
J . 1 'j V.' •%
.'• . .-• .'
" . l,V;.<
0.10j<
< 1 1 - •
r i T" .'- 'u
•• •- / 1.
O..JS-H
•". :?3
'.'. 1 "41-
'• . r '^2
•. 51S-
,.. 1 -
• ' . P *^ \.
'. . '. Sf-
i.O'-'O
'• . ? 'i ~
•:.''?j
;• . o :j j
"uPT
M.;;/
0
U
0
0
0
'•j
'.i
V,
n
0
0
0
- , 1 | - K
L lj
.007
.oor^
.oos^
.OObK
.005K
. '1 0 - 1^
.007
. 0 0 c-f
.01?
.OO^K
. 0 0 SK
.005K
n,.,3
••tG/
J
0
u
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
-T it
L ^
.01-
.01')
.015
.020
.015
• uO->.
.010
.030
.01?
.0-15
.COS
.020
                        K VALUE.  KNOWN TO Be
                        LESS  THAN INDICATED
                                                                                    r ''-I
                                                                                           Or  j41-t£5Tu'"N
                                                                                             21 1 120*
                                                                                           uooo  FEET  o

-------
   TT
           il
                FF"T
7TXO-X1- 11 «C
71/0 VO" 11  1^
73/06/01 lc,  10
7.1/07X 11 1 J 55
73/J-/!^ 11 f-^
      1! -' 1300
73/1 !/l- 1 )  "<0
          n  0°
          1 1  UO
          1?  ?0
!.<*.!.
                          ''.SI.'
                                   . T --J-L
             1 n i: K


             J"> J

             lor

             ."Mil,
                                                                           ? 1 ,• 2 H            '- 7 * ?. J
                                                                           *  ?S GO.',  '1:>5 01  00.0
                                                                           I        7.-,  *•! ^>KTj i  T\
                                                                           ' --^'- --,L'_ "' 'I -'i 5^-
                                                                           ;''-T -o  -.-:•-, .3 «i  c. OF  -t
                                                           Or'b71      O'^'1'-
                                                        --OS-OIS   r^MOS-TOT
I "T.1L
•i-i XL
: , c i -L
:> . f •, -
) . •"• i 7
'"i . o r- J
:.• . n 1 1
i "*. "' "*
A . ' •*•=•
1 l"' *? "•
•'1 .ill?
j . 0 0 &
<"• . 0 C ^
•j .OK-
i *p T
Mr,/
0
u
0

0
L
;>
L1
0
0
0
I'
->0
L o
.005K
.V»j'}*
.30-*
.006
.005K
. 0 U 7
.00?
.OOA
.01?
.016
.Ol'SK
.GOHK

MG/L -
O.OOS--'
O.OOS«:
0.01S
0.0?^
0.010
0.007
0.00^
U.G1S
0.01 =
0.030
0.005*
O.U07
                                                                                                0000  FEET
                  K  VALUE KNOWN TO  BE
                  LESS THiN  INDICATELJ

-------
c-; 00. J
                                                            OH 30.0
  -/L
73/1 '»/ 1."
7 VO^/C-i
73/3V01
73/07/1 1
7 v)-/i-;
73/04/1 i
7V 1 •.!/!-•
73/1 1/1-
73/1 ?/?'•!
74/0 1 / 1 ^
7«/C
7fc/PV?0
11
10
1"
10
10
i 0
!<••
I?
1?
1?
10
13
on
ac
~5
?C
a5
15
no
30
15
t"?
?0
30

,.-
' J t. L
I'/L
t1 . ric^
•: . i ).j
u.^J>;
:. v>'j
0. 120
•j . i?»*
i . 'J j '-
i . '50
•: .'*oi
O. 1 10K
L . 100K
C.POfi

' • K- T
T ">T
M-,
0
0
n
f\
0
•_i
i',
".
•)
j
(j
<•

— i "
/.(_
/L
.i)OS<
.C05<
.011
.037
.019
.0 I J
.lt>2
,«ia
.0'Jr>
.UOtK
. 0 0 5
. '> 1 0

o >-, -
„ U, ( ~\ V^ _
U-'T-l
•iG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.

•j .
0 .
n.
y .
0.
u .

.'l
.-, T C
' M >
0
r1
OC5^
Oil
005K
OOSi^
OoS".

0 0 &.
009
01?
oos<
OOSK
005

0-16
j ^. \ r
-"-< .; v —
MG/L
0.
0.
J.
0.
c .
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
i". T.- -M1. E-TO-j T\>
' / \l r -i.'Li. ' ••' -tSV-<
— . , .O ^_> . , ; i .t T ^ i )F S
_ _ -^ . 3 ' . , 1 k> • j r .T
i if-1 ii.es ?i
« 000
e5
r JT
j
005<
eic
O05.\
015
005K
liJ5
00*
00'-)
035
005
010
030
LESS THAN INDICATED
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE

-------
                                                  A d~  00.0 7=5 10  30. J
                                                   F0«\  Oo£r 3IVE"
                                                  i       7 . -i it J INt  T'i
                                                     i>'_   n :I_L
1 5 T £•
~Jj,V
TO
73/CW14
73/G5/PS
7VO«f/0 1
73/07/1 i
73/0 R/l-
7VO--3/1 >
7V1V1-1
73/1 I/I-
73/1 '/?y
7 <./(•) I/ If-.
7<4/0^/0^

7

1=.
^ ,-
*j r.
f. A
t^
15
10
I*
-5
- "i
• . -v u/ : 1
•.- [••!'..
" >/L
'>.'. J^
.-. !•*•:•
.'.i--;
: . ? r,
y . ?t>o
. . 1 '-0
i . i •: ;•
•« i '.-
C. . 3 -• C
O.P?^
J.?.V;
•!.!'•-
J. i 7-
T'. f
-!f.
II
G
1
1
0
L'.
P
:1
0
0
•)
y
0
«,3i
'- J-L
/L
. l.)0<
."'':
.'•O'!
.'00
.10G<<
. IOC"
.(•C .
•3 /-, .
0 .^ v- C-
.100
. 30'.i
.If JK
.1 •:•,"<.
~ ! '"'
T *-L
•• J/t
O..JOSK
;.nr,t,«
".C3C
•J . 1 ?^
./ . G 1 f-
. .^ 1.
•J.15U
•/ . c i s
0 . C u «
j . 0 i) t3
.1.C".5
J.GZ5
. . .01 j
-nD
0-T
7 .'!
- ' i ^ -
••:•',/ L r-
.3

0
A
U
'j
0
o
c
0
0
0
0
.OOSK
.00»
.005^
,ous<
.'J05K
.(•Of".
.007
. P 0 ?
.OU::l^
.005«
.005*
.005
.OOSK
0-'
H'Ob
^cS
-TIT
Mo/L ->
0
0
0
0
0
l>
c
\>
0
0
0
11
0
.010
.o?c
.0^0
.010
.OOSK
.OO^K
.010
.C07
.o?s
.015
.005
.015
.(•05K
                                                                       ,, r  t00  FEET
K VALUE  KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN  INDICATED

-------
7V07/
      ' .   i
          . ';  '"  lo MI  NM£ OF  L
                                                                          Jl-:-:iLES               2111204
                                                                                                 0000 FEET  DEPTH
               rC.'"IT        /         •!<"-/!        v ",/(_       M(.i/|_ p     Mfj/L


          -<• 30

          . -. u~
! .
", ,
0 ,
? .
C .
'. %
1 .
1 .
i ft
0.
0.
" „
•
? \ C
?70
•^ ^" , •
i 0 • •
i -)."!
i '.:
"•>.;

7 r, j
in>..^
JOO
1 0 'i
-'it.
0 o 0 1 2
0 . C 1 0
; . «'; i ^
j.^G
'• . 0 1 »
,) . 0 u *•
0 .07^
0 ^ •*
0 . 044
••• .00°
r. .030
•.' .015
v .015
0
(.
u
£
0
o
0
0
0
p
y
0
0
.005K
,f>2(!
. C Or
.OO'^K
.00*
. 00^
.00-
. 0 Ti "5
.o?c
.00*
.010
.013
,00'5K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0

0
.005'
.030
.015
.015
.010
oOlO
.00^
.015

.020
.035

.010

-------
            'S
            ->'
77-r-r----:~
7?V  '•'   '  -'
!••' "-..  •<  -,
            Tl
                                                                      3? 30.0 0->6 ?7 30. C
                                                                      Y  JIVF-
                                                                           7.5  ^LE -OLLO/
                                                                      6L-J "ILL'-'. -;FSV~-
                                                                     i-S  -sELO '..'a1-' AC-HKIM  3  MI  E OF CELINA
                                                                          S              211120^
                                                                                       0000  FEET  DE->TH
. ••) .'

T--T-.L
•'•-/L
•'.13-
•• . 1 ?o
; . o n
.i.r.7t-
r. ,04^
.• . 1 3 ^
VoOA-
•!.C3'-
o.o^^
.;.i--*S
T.'J.'S
;:^7i
^r..:, -,-.- i a
L-iTn-;
.-'--./L ^
0 .HUSK
C .OOS">
u.OO^
Co OOP
C.OOSK
: OOOSK
•J . 0 0 o

•j.OOSK
OoOOS
0.005K
or6*i;:;
J^OS-TOT

MG/L o
O.OOSK
0 = 015
U = 010
0.010
O.OOSK
0.005K
0 . J 1 5
0.010
0.010
0.015
OoOO'SK
                  K  VALUE KMOWN TO BE
                  LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
DATL
                  AS2102AA
36 <»1 00.0  065  06 00.0
                                                                                  POG2500*
                                                  211-»9    7.3 ALbANY
                                                  T/uALc  H(JULO« «ES
                                                  CtOAri FUt^K dKAfjCH/SPKlrtG  C-(Ec.K
                                                  11EPALES              2141204
                                                  "                     0000  FtET  DEPTH
u (J 6 3 wp
DATE TIME -DEPTH \02«,,N03
FKJM OF ".'-TOTAL
TO
73/05/01
73/06/01
73/07/03
73/08/01
73/09/04
73/09/29
73/1 1/06
73/12/04
74/01/02
74/01/30
74/U4/02
74/04/30
74/05/30
DAY FEET
09
08
12
09
Ob
09
10
13
06
12
13
22
09
00
30
00
CO
30
30
?0
00
30
00
00
00
30
MG/L
0
0
0
0

0
a

0
0
0
0
0
.170
,360
o290
,180

s060
.040

.200
o 52'j
.160
,2dO
o595
ToT fvJtL
M
MG/L
47cOOO
33.600
26.JOO
44oOOO

56,, 000
36.000
36.000
17.000
31.000
21.00U
76.000
33.000
0>610
••in j-m
T'jTAL
Mu/L
I3o200
3.500
3.000
1 1.600

lu.SOO
ItoOOO

1.600
7.400
5.700
15.000
6.700
00671
PnOS-DIb
UPT-iO

lo
1
t!
13

21
1 4

15
14
7
4U
17
L P
.000
.680
.300
.200

.000
.500

.000
.400
.600
.000
.000
00665
KHOb-TOT
50051 50053
FLOsi CONOU1T
KATt FLUo-MGD
MG/L P INST MoD MONTHLY
22.000
24.000
25.000
13.600

27.001)
26.000
16.600
24.UOO
22.000
14.500
55.000
2b.OOO
0.300
0.350
0.350
0.370
0.400
0.400
0.350
0.250
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.350
0.350
Oo300
OoJ33
0.350
0»350
Oo400
0.400
0.350
0.300
Oo350
0.350
0.300
0.350
0.350

-------