U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
697-O32
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE JAMES
BURKE AND McDOWELL COUNTIES
NORTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 383
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
AND THE
NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
802
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of North Carolina Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Sumnary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 14
VI. Appendices 15
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made,
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, L). S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the North Carolina Department
of Natural and Economic Resources for professional involvement
and to the North Carolina National Guard for conducting the
tributary sampling phase of the Survey.
Lewis R. Martin, Director of the Division of Environmental
Management; Darwin L. Coburn, Chief of the Water Quality Section;
and Julian R. Taylor, Supervisor of the Monitoring Program Unit;
provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the
Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General William M. Buck, formerly Adjutant General of
North Carolina, and Project Officer Colonel Arthur J. Bouchard,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the North Carolina National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
LAKE NAME
Bad in
Blewett Falls
Chatuge
Fontana
Hickory
High Rock
Hiwassee
James
John H. Kerr (Nut Bush Creek)
Junaluska
Lookout Shoals
Mountain Island
Norman
Rhodhiss
Santeetlah
Tillery
Waccamaw
Waterville
Wylie
COUNTY
Montgomery, Stanly
Anson, Richmond
Clay, NC; Towns, 6A
Graham, Swain
Alexander, Caldwell,
Catawba
Davidson, Rowan
Cherokee
Burke, McDowell
Granville, Vance, Warren,
NC; Halifax, Mecklenburg,
VA
Haywood
Alexander, Catawba, Iredell
Gaston, Mecklenburg
Catawba, Iredell, Lincoln,
Mecklenburg
Burke, Caldwell
Graham
Montgomery, Stanly
Columbus
Haywood
Gaston, Mecklenburg, NC;
York, SC
-------
LAKE JAMES
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
.LAKE
\ JAMES
~
Black \Mountain
Map Location
-------
LAKE JAMES
STORE! NO. 3708
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Lake James is eutrophic. It ranked
seventh in overall trophic quality when the 16 North Carolina
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of
six parameters as an index*. Nine of the lakes had greater
and one had the same median total phosphorus; 11 had greater
and one had the same median dissolved phosphorus; 13 had
greater and one had the same median inorganic nitrogen; and,
while only three lakes had greater mean Secchi disc transparency,
only one had greater mean chlorophyll a_. Marked depression of
dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at all five sampling stations
in July and September.
During their visits to the lake, Survey limnologists did not
observe any nuisance conditions.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Lake James was phosphorus
limited at the time the sample was collected (03/24/73). These
results are substantiated by the lake data; i.e., the mean N/P
ratios at all sampling times were 17/1 or greater.
* See Appendix A.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The phosphorus contribution of point
sources amounted to 5.8% of the total load reaching the lake.
The Old Fort wastewater treatment plant contributed 5.4% of
the total load.
Survey data indicate a total phosphorus loading rate of
1.12 g/m2/yr which is slightly above the rate (0.94 g/m2/yr)
proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenwelder and Dillon, 1974) as a
eutrophic loading rate (see page 13). Therefore, every effort
should be made to minimize phosphorus inputs to the lake.
2. Non-point sources—Non-point sources accounted for
94.2% of the total phosphorus input to the lake during the
sampling year. The Catawba River accounted for 45.6%, and
the North Fork Catawba River accounted for 38.5% of this total.
The North Fork Catawba River had a phosphorus export rate
of 51 kg/km2/yr, which is much higher than the rates of the
other Lake James tributaries (see page 12). This may have
been due to unknown and unsampled point sources impacting this
river or its tributaries; e.g., wastes from North Cove, Ashland,
or other communities upstream. If such phosphorus sources
exist and are controllable, a reduction of the North Fork
export rate to the same level as the Catawba River rate (29
kg/km2/yr} would result in lowering the lake loading rate to
well below the eutrophic rate and should result in improved
water quality. The phosphorus load to downstream Rhodhiss Lake
(Working Paper No. 388) would be reduced as well.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 26.35 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 13.5 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 43 meters.
4. Volume: 356 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 208 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Catawba River 463.6 9.5
North Fork, Catawba River 221.7 3.5
Paddy Creek 16.3 0.3
Linville River 174.0 4.0
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 84.8 2.5
Totals 960.4 19.8
2. Outlet -
Catawba River 986.8** 19.8**
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 155.7 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 129.0 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Park, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
4
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake James was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
five stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(4.6 m to surface) sample was composited from the five stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for
algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 30.5 meters at station 1, 15.2 meters at station 2,
36.6 meters at station 3, 35.1 meters at station 4, and 16.8 meters
at station 5.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (CJ
D1SS Oxr (MG/L)
CNOCTYf (MCftOMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TUT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02«N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N 1MG/L)
INOtfG N (HG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLrfPrL A (UG/L)
SECCHJ (HtTEWS)
A.
1ST
HANGE
7.1 -
9.2 -
50. -
7.1 -
10. -
O.Olb - 0
0.003 - U
0.030 - U
0.020 - 0
0.200 - 0
0.060 - 0
0.250 - 0
0.7 -
0.5 -
SUMMAHf OF PHYSICAL ANO CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FUrt
STOrtET CUOE 3703
SAMPLING (
5
13.0
11.5
65.
8.4
21.
.Odu
.033
.320
.09i)
.60,1
.3ttO
.640
12.9
l.-i
SITES
MEAN
10.4
10. 0
57.
7.7
IS.
0.040
0.014
0.187
0.045
0.27S
O.Z33
0.462
6.2
1.1
3/24/73)
MEDIAN
10.4
9.9
Sd.
7.8
16.
0.031
O.Oli)
0.180
0.040
0.200
0.220
0.4ttb
S.3
1.1
2ND
HANbE
8.2 -
2.1 -
50. -
6.3 -
10. -
0.008 - 0
0.002 - 0
0.040 - 0
0.040 - 0
0.200 - 0
O.OdO - 0
0.240 - 0
5.3 -
1.2 -
SAMPLING ( 7/
5
29.4
10.5
10.
9.4
19.
.042
.030
.460
.120
.900
.520
.901)
16.1
2.7
SITES
MEAN
21.6
6.S
58.
7.5
14.
o.oia
O.OOb
0.147
0.066
0.381
0.213
0.52U
9.8
1.9
LAKE JAMES
5/731
MEDIAN
23.4
5.9
SB.
6.6
14.
0.016
0.004
0.070
0.060
0.300
0.155
0.500
9.1
i.a
3KD
HANGE
a. 3 -
0.0 -
41. -
6.2 -
10. -
0.012 - 0
0.004 - 0
0.020 - 0
0.020 - U
0.200 - 1
0.050 - 0
0.220 - 1
4.2 -
1.9 -
SAMPLING ( 9/24/731
B
27.5
8.6
86.
a.6
26.
.038
.015
.420
.660
.100
.700
.140
6. B
2.7
SUES
MEAN
21.6
3.3
59.
6.6
IS.
0.021
0.009
0.063
0.123
0.400
0.166
0.463
7.U
2.4
MEDIAN
24.9
1.6
55.
6.4
14.
o.oia
0.009
0.030
0.050
0.310
0.090
0.425
7.7
2.5
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/24/73
07/05/73
09/24/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2,
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Melosira
Asterionella
Cyclotella
Pennate diatoms
Cryptomonas
Other genera
Total
Tabellaria
Anabaena
Melosira
Cryptomonas
Flagellates
Other genera
Total
Lyngbya
Chroococcus
Flagellates
Raphidiopsis
Anabaena
Other genera
Algal units
per ml
556
111
87
37
37
137
965
821
640
181
85
85
84
1,896
Total
5,917
-------
c.
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
03/24/73
07/05/73
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
05
01
02
03
04
05
01
02
03
04
05
Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
09/24/73
Chlorophyll
(yg/1)
5.3
0.7
12.9
7.9
4.1
7.6
5.3
16.1
11.1
9.1
8.8
8.2
4.2
5.9
7.7
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.010 P
.020
.050
.025
.050 P + 1.0 N
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
P
P +
0.5 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.060
0.035
0.060
0.010
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
2.
0.164
0.164
0.164
0,164
0.664
1.164
1.164
alga, Selenastrum
0.4
2.9
2.8
3.4
10.7
17.8
0.4
capri -
Discussion -
The control yield of the as
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Lake James was moderate at the time of sample collection
(03/24/73).
-------
The assay data also indicate that James Lake was phos-
phorus limited at that time. Note the increased yields with
the addition of the first orthophosphorus spike but the
lack of a significant increase in yield with the addition of
only nitrogen. The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation
at all sampling times; the mean inorganic nitrogen to ortho-
phosphorus ratios were 17 to 1 or greater, and phosphorus
limitation would be expected.
It should be noted that with the initial addition of
orthophosphorus, the sample became nitrogen limited (N/P
ratio = 8/1). Therefore, no significant increases in yields
resulted from further additions of orthophosphorus.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the North Carolina
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff months of January and February when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in March, 1973, and was completed in
February, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the North Carolina District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for
the tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were calcu-
lated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows. Nutrient
loads shown are those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient concentrations in Paddy Creek and the Linville River at
stations C-l and D-l and the mean annual ZZ flow.
The operator of the Old Fort wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
-------
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known munclpal -
Name
Old Fort*
Linville**
Pop.
Served
10
Treatment
Mean Flow
(m3/d)
1,000 act. sludge 924.3
variable septic tanks ?
Receiving
Water
Curtis Creek
Linville River
2. Known industrial - None
* Byrd, 1973; more than 25% of the waste load is contributed by industry.
** Wiseman, 1975.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 13,500 45.6
North Fork, Catawba River 11,390 38.5
Paddy Creek 100 0.3
Linville River 1,505 5.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage {non-point load) - 925 3.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Old Fort 1,600 5.4
Linville (septic tanks) 110 0.4
d. Septic tanks* - 15 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 460 1.6
Total 29,605 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Catawba River 48,705
3. Net annual P loss - 19,100 kg.
* Estimate based on 44 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 172,040 40.3
North Fork, Catawba River 73,685 17.3
Paddy Creek 4,850 1.1
Linville River 90,270 21.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 49,675 11.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Old Fort 3,820 0.9
Linville (septic tanks) 4,050 0.9
d. Septic tanks* - 470 0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 28,445 6.7
Total 427,305 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Catawba River 375,270
3. Net annual N accumulation - 52,035 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Catawba River 29 371
North Fork, Catawba River 51 332
Paddy Creek 6 298
Linville River 9 519
* Estimate based on 44 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 1.12 loss* 16.2 2.0
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Lake James:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 0.94
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.47
* There was an apparent loss of phosphorus during the sampling year. This
may have been due to non-representative sampling resulting in an under-
estimation of the phosphorus load (septic tanks in camps and parks,
unknown point sources, etc.) or to hypolimnetic drawdown carrying phos-
phorus solubilized from bottom sediments. The lake data indicate a
slight increase in total phosphorus concentration in the deeper samples
at station 04 (above Linville Dam), especially during the July and
September samplings.
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Byrd, Gilman (operator), 1973. STP questionnaire (Old Fort treatment
facilities). Old Fort.
Park, David, 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry). NC
Dept. of Nat. & Econ. Resources, Raleigh.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Weiss, Charles M., 1972. A proposal to the Water Resources Research
Institute of the University of North Carolina. The trophic state
of North Carolina lakes, covering the period July 1, 1972 to
June 30, 1973. U. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Wiseman, Robert C. (Avery County Mgr.), 1975. Personal communication
(population estimates of Linville, NC: 3,000 per month for three
summer months, and 200 per month the remainder of the year).
Linville.
-------
VL. APPENDICES
15
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 3719
2 3716
3 3711
4 3707
5 3704
6 3713
7 3708
8 3710
9 3715
10 3705
11 3717
12 3709
13 3702
14 3718
15 3701
16 3706
LAKE WACCAMAW
SANTEELAH LAKE
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
HIWASSEE LAKE
FONTANA LAKE
LAKE NORMAN
LAKE JAMES
LOOKOUT SHOALS
RHODHISS LAKE
LAKE HICKORY
LAKE TILLERY
LAKE JUNALUSKA
8LEWETT FALLS LAKE
WATERVILLE RESERVOIR
BADIN LAKE
HIGH ROCK LAKE
INDEX NO
534
446
419
414
392
346
334
327
296
263
246
220
200
140
124
76
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3701 BAOtM LAKE
370a BLEWETT FALLS LAKE
3704 FONTANA LAKE
3705 LAKE HICKORY
3706 HIGH HOCK LAKE
3707 HIWASSEE LAKE
3708 LAKE JAMES
3709 LAKE JUNALUSKA
3710 LOOKOUT SHOALS
3711 MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
3713 LAKE NORMAN
3715 RHOOHISS LAKE
3716 SANTEELAH LAKE
3717 LAKE TILLERY
3718 WATERVILLE RESERVOIR
3719 LAKE WACCAHAW
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
33
7
100
27
13
87
60
47
53
73
67
20
93
40
0
80
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
<
(
(
(
(
(
5)
1)
15)
4)
2)
13)
9)
7)
fl>
11)
10)
3)
14)
6)
0)
12)
MEDIAN
INORG N
7 (
13 (
33 (
60 <
20 <
60 1
87 1
27 1
47 1
73 1
S3 1
67 1
93 1
40 1
0 I
100 i
1)
2)
5)
I 9)
! 3)
I 12)
[ 13)
I 4)
; 7)
i in
I 8)
! 10)
( 14)
1 6)
I 0)
t IS)
500-
MEAN SEC
27 (
7 (
93 (
53 (
0 (
87 (
80 (
43 (
60 <
43 I
73 (
33 (
100 (
13 (
20 (
67 <
4)
1)
141
8)
0)
13)
12)
6)
9)
6)
11)
5)
15)
2)
3)
10)
MEAN
CHLORA
27
73
100
13
0
47
7
20
67
53
40
93
60
33
80
87
( 4)
( 11)
( 15)
( 2)
( 0)
( 7)
( 1)
( 3)
( 10>
( e>
( 6)
( 14)
( 9)
( 5)
( 12)
( 13)
15-
MIN 00
3 I
93 <
3 I
80 1
23 <
50 1
23 <
SO 1
60 1
87 (
23 1
70 (
23 i
70 i
40 i
100 i
0)
14)
0)
: 12>
2)
; 7)
2)
; 7)
; 9)
: 13)
! 2)
1 10)
I 2)
1 10)
t 6)
( 15)
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
27 <
7 (
63 (
50 1
20 (
63 1
77 <
33 1
40 1
90 1
90 1
13 (
77 i
50 i
0 i
100 i
4)
1)
9)
; 7)
3)
; 9)
; ii>
; 5>
: 6>
: 13)
! 13)
1 2)
I 11)
I 7)
1 0)
I 15)
INDEX
NO
124
200
392
233
76
414
334
220
327
419
346
296
446
246
140
534
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3701 BADIN LAKE
3702 8LEWETT FALLS LAKE
3704 FONTANA LAKE
3705 LAKE HICKORY
3706 HIGH HOCK LAKE
3707 HIWASSEE LAKE
3708 LAKE JAMES
3709 LAKE JUNALUSKA
3710 LOOKOUT SHOALS
3711 MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
3713 LAKE NORMAN
3715 RHODHISS LAKE
3716 SANTEELAH LAKE
3717 LAKE TILLERY
3718 WATERVILLE RESERVOIR
3719 LAKE WACCAMAW
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.042
0.090
0.011
0.047
0.090
0.015
0*020
0.031
0.026
0.018
0*019
0.061
0.011
0.040
0.103
0.018
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.680
0.655
0.550
0.320
0.580
0.240
0.160
0.560
0.370
0.270
0.330
0.305
0.160
0.470
0.860
0.120
500-
MEAN SEC
466.750
476.889
392.650
461.000
477.454
420.555
428.866
462.000
459.167
462.000
446.667
462.111
366.400
468.600
468.333
455.667
MEAN
CHLORA
7.190
4.167
3.436
7.275
14.283
5.678
7.660
7.233
4.200
5.580
5.807
3.578
5.360
6.827
3.817
3.583
15-
MIN DO
14.900
10.800
14.900
13.400
14.800
14.200
14.800
14.200
13.800
12«eOO
14.800
13.600
14.800
13.600
14.400
9.800
MEDI,
OISS ORTt
0.012
0.034
0.007
0.008
0.017
0.007
0.006
0.009
0.008
0.005
0.005
0.019
Oc.006
0.008
0*041
0.004
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSIONS FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10~ = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NORTH CAROLINA
LAKE CODE 3706 LAKE JAMES
10/21/75
TOTAL
TRIBUTARY
3708A1
3708A2
370881
370 8C1
3708D1
3708ZZ
DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE (50 Ml) 381.
SUB-DRAINAGE
ARE A (SO MI)
381.00
179.00
85.60
6.30
67.20
42.90
00
NORMALIZED FLOWS ICFS)
JAN
848.00
349.00
147.00
12.00
167.00
96.00
FEB
612.00
442.00
162.00
14.00
184.00
114.00
MAR
650.00
485.00
188.00
16.00
212.00
128.00
APR
579.00
456.00
168.00
15.00
190.00
118.00
MAY
581.00
344.00
116.00
11.00
133.00
85.00
JUN
765.00
294.00
90.00
8.70
103.00
69.00
JUL
691.00
267.00
85.00
8.10
99.00
65.00
AUG
673.00
276.00
110.00
9.10
126.00
72.00
SEP
808.00
272.00
101.00
8.90
114.00
70.00
OCT
730.00
276.00
103.00
9.10
119.00
72.00
NOV
850.00
276.00
102.00
8.90
115.00
71.00
DEC
886.00
313.00
115.00
10.00
132.00
81.00
MEAN
723.36
336.78
123.70
10.88
140.93
86.58
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE ASEA OF LAKE
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS
381.00
381.00
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
B402.79
8673.00
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS (CFS)
TRIUUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY
3708A1
3708A2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
FLOW DAY
FLOW
1830.00
1560.00
1910.00
1150.00
1040.00
550.00
1100.00
767.00
664.00
452.00
14,80.00
1280.00
960.00
660.00
780.00
SIS. 00
360.00
365.00
235.00
325.00
300.00
640.00
645.00
620.00
25
15
20
23
24
12
15
14
10
8
6
2
25
15
20
23
24
12
15
14
10
8
6
2
1720.00
263.00
509.00
117.00
832.00
46.00
2040.00
100,00
540.00
390.00
2110.00 20
664.00 16
635.00
435.00
370.00
450.00
370.00
415.00
260.00
235. 00
155.00
440.00
675.00 20
635.00 16
114.00
1620.00
420.00
515.00
-------
TRISUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOK NORTH CAROLINA
10/21/75
LAKE CODE 3708
LAKE JAHES
MCAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OA1LY FLOHS(CFS)
TR1BUTAHY MONTH YEAK
370881
3708C1
370301
3 73
4 73
5 73
6 73
7 73
a 73
9 73
10 73
11 73
12 73
1 74
2 74
3 73
4 73
5 73
6 73
7 73
8 73
9 73
ID 73
11 73
12 73
I 74
Z 74
3 73
* 73
5 73
6 73
7 73
8 73
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
7b/10/?0
3^0801
35 4
6
7
6
fe
6
b
6
b
.60
.50
.40
.40
.20
.20
.40
.30
.20
.90
.fa
• 6(J
. 6'J
.20
.90
.**3
.20
.20
.20
.30
MG/L
1 1
11
12
11
13
13
11
11
14
15
10K
19
18
15
13
18
13
13
14
26
2111202
0105 FEET DEPTH
OOblO 00625 00630 00671
NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 HhOS-OIS
TOTAL N N-TOTAL OHTriO
Mb/L
J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.050
.050
.040
.040
.040
.050
.070
.050
.060
.060
.070
.050
.050
.040
.030
.040
.040
.050
.040
.660
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
.300
.200
.200K
.200*
.200K
.200
.700
.300
.200
.200
.200K
.200K
.200K
.400
.300
.300
.300
.300
.200
.100
Mt./L
0.240
0.230
0.230
0.290
0.310
0.320
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.160
0.310
0.390
0.430
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.190
0.390
0.420
0.040
MG/L P
0.026
0.024
0.027
0.030
0.032
0.030
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.030
0.025
0.006
0.009
0.010
0.014
0.014
0.015
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
U'Mr. /S/lU/>u
Qfil't UN
Fh>UM Or
TO 'JrtY
73/03/2"+ ib
1?
Ib
IS
IT
15
7j/u7/ub Ib
1*
In
ih
16
Ib
lo
/3/oy/?^ IS
Ib
IS
ID
IS
IS
Ib
>:
Ob
Ub
05
US
U5
Cb
1C
0
')
li
0
0
ID
15
15
(5
15
IS
IS
Ib
)l.'Jln r
(•-iitfT
0 0 0 U
Ou'Jb
ili;lr>
OO^b
UJ7S
•J 1 •) u
5 J J u
U 0 0 i
i< '1 1 'J
isylrt
•JjJi
y j r> 0
U'Jua
003!)
UOOb
CiHb
OU2S
OO'+b
vi'Jbb
ijij-^0
'HOb-UT ChLhPhYL
a
'-i'j/L i-1 UC-/L
i' . u h 3 b . j
L- , t r> r1
u .Obfc
C- . u b b
'I .i-3 I
i, .Ob/
«.» . 0 ? 1 7 . b
J .C la
V . 0 ?H
•u . 0 1 6
i. .01*
<,' . 0 JO
•J.OJO
'.J.OJo n.tt
n.o?i
n.o^
0.017
«.(?£•+
V.U^IJ
0.0 36
u 2.0 (Mi
;u.o
LAf\ti
J7U1
1 Ih'HALtiS
J
2111202
DEPTH
-------
STOkET KETRIEVAL UAFL
370B02
35 44 46.0 081 57 20.0
LAKE JAMtb
37111 NOHTH CAROLINA
0 0 0 10
0030J
OATt
FROM
TO
73/03/24
73/07/05
73/09/24
TIME OtPTH it
Of
DAY F'ttT
IS
IS
15
IS
15
15
15
15
15
IS
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
40
40
40
40
40
15
15
15
15
15
15
45
45
45
45
45
45
JOOO
0003
0015
0030
OOSO
0000
0004
0010
0025
0035
0050
0000
0005
001S
0'J2b
0035
0050
lATLR
TEMP
CC.NT
12
11
10
10
B
28
27
24
19
12
9
25
25
23
17
l(j
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
•
•
•
•
*
•
*
•
.
t)
0
5
2
3
7
3
<+
1
9
6
8
1
5
.
0.
0
8
0
6
b
1
2
0
1
6
2
2
y
7
HtPALES
0007?
StCCHl
INCHES
IB
72
7b
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICHOMHO
50K
50K
5 OK
55
bOK
69
55
61
60
70
86
75
81
52
3
00400
PH
su
7.30
7. JO
7.20
7.10
7.10
9.20
8.80
7.70
6.60
6.40
8.60
7.90
6.ti()
6.40
6.30
6.3J
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
10i<
10K
10K
10
14
10
14
14
17
lb
16
13
15
18
23
211
0055
OU610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.030
0.080
0.090
0.070
0.120
0.100
0.060
O.OBO
0.060
a. oso
0.040
0.060
0.170
0.250
0.470
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.600
0.600
0.300
0.200K
0.200K
0.700
0.500
0.300
0.400
0.500
Oo900
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
Mb/L
0.290
0.300
0.290
0.280
0.310
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.290
0.460
0.030
0.020
0.070
0.130
0.150
0.020
006T1
PHOS-OIS
URlKO
MG/L P
0.019
0.015
0 = 017
0.020
00033
0.008
0.005
0.004
0.014
OoOll
0 = 011
OoOlO
0.012
0,012
OoOoe
0.007
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
Dflfh
DATE.
T|Mt DcfTH
IJ0666
PtiOi-TuT
Fr*OM UK
fu
73/03/24
73/0 V/O'-s
73/0^/24
15
Ib
IS
15
IS
15
IS
15
IS
IS
14
14
14
14
14
14
r i
40
40
40
40
40
IS
15
15
IS
IS
45
*S
45
45
45
45
FL£T
yooo
0003
00 ID
0030
0 -J b U
•JOOO
0004
0 J 1 0
0<)2b
Ju^fl
'JUOj
DUOS
COlb
^02S
C'O J5
uOS'O
HO/L
J .
L1 .
0 .
r*.
0 .
u .
0 .
CT «
(: .
1' .
rJ.
0 .
^
j .
0.
j.
y .
r1
Oo7
06-b
OdG
0 7 3
(; 'ff>_
020
0-?7
0 3vj
04^
O-^'j
'J J4
OJu
038
GJ7
OJJ
03H
CHLKPHYL
A
UG/L
0.7
b.J
Jb 44 46.U 08) 5V iJO.O
LAKt JAM£S
37111
2111202
0055 FEET
-------
OAlt
370803
3S 44 02.0 081 SI 02.0
LArtt JAMES
37G23 NORTH CAROLINA
DATE
FkOM
TO
73/03/29
73/J7/06
73/09/^4
OoOlO
TIME DEPTH rf«TEft
OF TEMP
UAY FEET
09
09
09
09
UV
U9
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
45
45
45
45
45
•+S
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0000
U004
001S
0045
0075
0100
UOOO
0007
bOltt
1)040
0070
0095
u!20
0000
OOOb
0020
004U
0060
0080
oiuo
CtNT
13
12
11
10
8
7
?B
M
24
19
17
16
12
2b
26
25
25
23
21
1H
.0
.1
.V
. J
. s
.M
.7
.1
.0
. 1
.2
.1
.8
.2
.1
.«
.2
.b
.H
.0
11EPALES
00300
DO
HCi/L
11.5
10.4
9.8
9.9
9.6
^.1
•?.4
7.d
4.b
5.0
4.6
3.2
f.8
6.4
I.'*
0.4
0.4
O.b
00077 00094
TrtANSP CNDuCTVr
SECCHl FIELD
INCHtS MiCKOMHO
56 60
56
5H
58
62
62
70 63
55
50K
55
ba
60
63
108 56
55
54
63
64
61
55
3
00400
PH
SU
0.40
8.20
8.10
7.9U
7.60
7.80
9.20
9.10
6.50
b.SO
6. 4Q
6.40
6.30
6.90
6.7y
6.50
b.40
6.30
6.30
6.20
00410
T ALK
CACOJ
Mli/L
16
15
16
16
17
18
15
13
16
15
16
16
18
14
14
12
14
17
17
16
2111202
0)04
00610
NHJ-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.02U
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.070
0.070
0.060
0.070
0.070
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.020K
0.120
O.c?00
FEE1 DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.900
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.600
0.200K
0.200
0.400
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.400
00630
N02kN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
O.OSO
0.080
0.170
0.190
0.190
O.ObO
0.040
0.050
O.OBO
0.230
0.280
0.370
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.060
0.020
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
OkTHO
MG/L P
0.003
0.003
0.010
0.016
0.011
0.007
0.007
0.005
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.005
0.009
0.011
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.009
0.006
K VALUE KNOMN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOr^E!
Unit
DATE
FROM
Tu
73/03/29
73/07/Ofe
73/C9/2*
TIM
UF
JAY
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
04
09
09
09
09
U9
It
14
14
14
14
14
1<+
F. G
K
45
45
<*5
45
45
4S
45
**5
4S
45
45
45
45
CO
00
(•0
00
00
CO
00
•LET
0000
0004
0015
0045
0075
(JlOO
OOJO
0007
Q'jlrt
0040
007J
110^5
0 1 £fO
uOOO
0005
no 20
0040
C')60
0(^80
0100
MG/L
u.037
J.032
0.0 ?b
u.037
o . 0 ?.<+
.1.0)9
0.0 13
C . C 11
0.010
l> . 0 1 3
•J . 0 1 (3
•j . 0 1 fa
'J . 0 1 4
o . 0 1 J
a. o i j
u.015
U0?u
A
Ub/L
In. 1
4.2
3S 44 02.0 unl 51 0^.0
Lb
NUKTH CAROLINA
HtHALtlS
J
FEET DEPTH
-------
bTORET KtTKltLVAL OATt 75/lC/c!0
370804
35 44 42.0 081 50 24.0
LAKE JAMES
37023 NOKTH CAROLINA
000 l!)
DATii TIME DEtUH
FriOM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/03/29 10 00 OOUO
10 00 0004
10 00 0020
10 00 0045
10 00 0080
10 CO 0115
73/07/06 10 5<5 0000
10 55 000 1
10 55 0007
1U R5 U021)
10 55 0030
li) S5 0075
10 S5 01 10
73/09/24 16 15 OOUO
Ifa 15 0005
Ib }S 002U
16 15 0040
Ib IS 006b
Ib IS J09U
Ib 15 OlOb
C£NT
1?.5
12. H
11.2
10.?
B.b
7. /
?o.7
?t>.7
?e.b
23.4
?O.H
16. d
14.9
27.1
26.?
25. d
?e,.l
23.1
21.0
Ift.u
lltPALES
00300
UU
MG/L
11.5
10.2
9.8
9.M
9.3
9.1
4. 1
9.3
S.b
3.5
4.9
3.3
H.O
6.2
Kb
KO
o.O
0.0
00077 00394
TKANSP CNOUCTVY
3t.CCHl FIELD
INCHES MICHIMHO
*,4 55
55
55
bO
62
6,5
7ft 57
55
55
b2
b3
53
57
100 54
53
49
56
59
55
73
3
00400
Pri
SU
a. 10
8.30
8.10
7.90
7.90
7.70
9.10
9.00
9.00
6.50
6.50
6.60
6.40
6.7o
6. 70
6.70
6.40
6.30
6.40
6.6(1
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
15
17
19
20
19
21
13
12
15
18
18
16
11
13
11
10K
11
14
15
16
2111202
0120
00610
NM3-N
TOTAL
Mb/L
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.04U
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.080
0.070
0.050
0.070
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.080
0.090
0.260
0.640
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.700
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.500
0.700
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.110
0.170
0.17J
0.180
0.050
0.040
0.060
0.080
0.100
0.2SO
0.280
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.020
00671
PriOS-OIS
OKTHO
MG/L P
0.006
0.006
0.004
0.013
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.01J
0.008
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
KLFKlffVAL OATt 7-3/1U/2U
DATE IIMF QtVTH ^nUb-TJf
FKOM OF
ro L>Ar FtcT
73/03/2^ 10
10
10
1 0
10
10
73/07/0* 10
13
10
lu
10
1C
10
73/li4/2<* lh
16
lo
If!
1*1
16
16
no
00
00
DO
00
00
s
-------
STOHET HETHIEVAU DATE
370805
35 46 23.0 081 51 17.0
LAKE JAMES
37023 NOKTH CAKOLINA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/29
73/0 7/Ofa
73/09/24
00010
TIME DEPTH WATthi
Of- TtMP
UAY FEET
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
15
15
IS
00
00
00
00
00
28
?8
?B
28
28
28
45
45
45
45
45
0000
0004
0015
0030
0055
0000
0005
001LI
U02U
0035
0049
0000
0005
0020
0035
004b
CENT
12.
12.
11.
10.
9.
28.
28.
27.
23.
20.
in.
27.
26.
?5,
25.
24.
1
0
4
7
6
0
2
5
it
ij
4
5
4
9
4
a
003UO
00
MG/L
10
10
lii
9
6
8
&
b
2
3
8
b
5
3
.6
.1
. 1
.b
.7
.7
.9
.1
.9
.6
.0
.b
.4
.0
11EPALES
003UO
00
MG/L
10.6
10.1
10.1
9.b
6.7
8.7
8.9
b.l
2.9
3.6
8.0
b.b
5.4
3.0
00077
THANSP
SECCH1
INCHES
60
10B
108
00094
CNUUCTW
KIELJ
M1CHOMHO
SOK
50K
50K
50K
50K
55
50K
SOK
50K
SOK
50K
45
4fo
47
46
44
3
00400
PH
su
7.90
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
a.3o
8.60
8.20
6.50
6.30
b.30
6.90
7.00
6.80
6.50
6.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mu/L
18
19
17
13
17
12
11
10
11
12
12
11
10
11
11
11
2111202
0059
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
a. 030
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.060
0.100
0.100
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.050
0.080
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.900
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.600
O.SOO
0.300
0.300
0.300
00630
N02C.M03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.130
0.130
0.150
0.150
0.180
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.090
0.110
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
OHTHO
MG/L P
0.004
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.004
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOrttT HET*IF_YAL DATE
DATE
FWOM
TO
73/03/39
73/07/06
73/0^/24
TIME DEPTH
OK
UAY
13
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
IS
Ib
IS
F
00
00
00
00
00
?a
?H
?s
2b
2B
?8
45
45
45
45
45
0000
0004
0015
003U
0055
UOOO
0005
0010
0030
l»03b
OU49
oooo
0005
0020
003b
0045
00665 32217
(JHOS-TOT CHLRPhfL
MG/L
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
J.
J.
u.
0.
0.
i).
u.
J.
0.
0.
l>.
A
P UG/L
019 4.1
021
0 19
017
025
013 y.l
OOrt
OOS
014
010
014
014 7.7
OlD
015
Old
031
370805
35 46 23.0 081 51 17.0
LAKE JAMES
37033 NOKTH CAROLINA
11EPALES
3
31U202
OOS9 FEET
DEPTH
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/10/20
370HA1 LS370tfAl
35 44 30.0 081 50 00.0
CATAUBA htlvER
37039 7.S GLEN ALPINE
0/LAKE JAMEb
HfO 1223 briUG .25 UJUNSTREAMLlNVlLLE UAM
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TU
73/03/35
73/04/15
73/05/20
73/06/23
73/07/24
73/08/12
73/10/14
73/1 1/10
73/12/Od
74/01/06
74/01/20
74/02/02
74/02/16
U163U 00625
TIME DEPTH NO?(iN03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
UAY FEET
11
13
12
12
09
10
14
12
12
11
12
12
45
35
02
SO
30
40
45
20
30
15
00
20
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
.250
.176
.110
.170
.147
.160
.130
.004
.200
.294
.232
.200
.216
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
200
310
605
210
•J60
430
?00
400
300
000
100
300
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PhOS-OIS PHOb-TOT
TOTAL OrtTHO
Mi,/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p.
0.
0.
0.
016
048
042
046
033
038
023
026
016
072
036
025
050
MG/L
Ci.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
p
012
019
014
021
039
040
054
136
068
028
024
055
060
MG/L P
0.035
0.05U
0.040
0.055
0.090
0.055
0.095
o.iao
0.115
0.055
0.035
0.105
0.110
-------
iTOKET utTRIEVAL DATE 75/10/20
3-5 4j UO.O IM2
CAJAwdA Klv£(V
37 15
I/LAKE JAMES
SECONUArtY rtU dKDG
Lb3/08A2
00 00.0
DATL
FROM
TO
73/03/25
73/04/15
73/05/20
73/06/23
73/07/24
73/0^/12
73/10/14
73/11/10
73/12/08
74/01/06
7^/01/20
74/02/02
74/02/16
00630 00625
TIME QtPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
iJAY FEE1
10
12
13
10
07
13
12
13
13
12
13
12
10
10
45
30
30
00
30
00
15
00
30
45
MG/L
0
0
(J
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.168
.154
.176
.220
.lay
.19H
.098
.056
.208
.144
• 20b
.208
.192
00610 00671 006b5
NH3-N PHOS-UIS PriOS-TOT
TOTAL UHTrlO
M(i/L Mb/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
230
842
b30
340
860
S60
250
?00
000
100
100
100K
200
0
0
0
0
•j
'j
0
0
0
0
0
0
Li
.025
.038
.033
.O^C
.050
.024
.052
.040
. J56
.040
.026
.005
.025
MG/L H
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.009
.018
.013
.042
.013
.062
.026
.032
.040
.008
.032
.015
.015
MG/L P
0.030
0.035
0.035
G.110
0.035
0.0 HO
0.055
0.055
0.095
0.020
0.050
U .025
0.030
Mj N OFMAKION
2111204
uOOO FEET DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
KtTKlEVAL UATL
U
3/i)8bl
35
-------
OATC 7t>/lG/20
3703C1 LS3/08C1
jib to uo.o oai 52 30.0
HAUQY CKtdK
37 rtAH BUWKt CU
I/LANE JAMES
Hdr 12t, HrtOG .3 M[ S* OF L
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET OEPTh
DATE
TO
73/03/dS
73/04/15
7 J/GS/2u
73/06/23
73/07/24
7 J/ Jd/ le?
73/10/14
73/11/10
73/12/0^
7<+/G 1/06
74/01/20
7<+/02/02
74/02/16
TIME UEPTr
Of
UAY FEET
11
14
10
13
20
10
13
10
10
11
10
10
00
07
35
30
30
00
30
00
*»E>
00
00
30
00630 00625
•i IM02&N03 TUT KJEL
N-TOTAL N
MC5/L
0
(i
0
0
0
0
v)
0
0
0
J
l)
0
.042
.026
.013
.023
.05H
.058
.02SJ
,0i2
.052
.Oti**
. 0*+4
.036
.056
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
(j.
0.
0.
0,
(J.
0.
0.
0.
120
140
270
<+43
7hO
200
500
900
800
500
looK
100K
300
OOblO 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS H>ri05-TOT
TOTAL OHTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
i) *
0.
0.
it .
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
036
033
015
037
u66
035
069
u32
068
064
016
010
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 •
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
(J.
G.
H
005K
005K
035K
005K
007
006
005K
012
OOSK
005K
OU5N
005K
OObK
MG/L P
O.OOSK
0.005K
O.OOSK
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.005K
0.06C
0.005K
O.OOSK
O.uObK
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
HETKIEVAL DATE 75/10/20
370dul Lb370d01
35 41 30.0 081 52 3U.O
LINVILLE *IVEK
37 MAP BUKKt CO
7/LAKE JAMES
nwT 126 BKUG 2.5 MI MIME OF LONGT04N
11EPALE5 2111204
H 0000 FEET OEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/OJ/25
73/04/15
73/05/20
73/Ob/2J
73/07/24
7J/OB/12
73/IU/14
73/11/10
73/1^/00
74/01/06
74/01/20
74/02/02
74/02/lb
TIME DEPTt
OF
DAY FEtT
10
14
10
13
20
09
13
u^
10
10
14
10
35
20
00
45
00
35
05
20
?5
?0
45
00
'JCb30 00625
1 N02f»N03 TOT KJEL
N-TOTAL N
MG/L
0
0
u
0
U
c
0
0
0
0
J
u
c
.220
.115
.044
.1JO
.120
.04U
.022
.0 10K
.160
.240
. lt»H
.176
.16H
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
.?»
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
180
210
600
320
300
300
POO
200
600
•+00
100K
300
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-01S HHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORfMO
MG/L
0.029
0.05B
0.024
0.030
0.077
0.110
U.Olti
0.024
0.04B
0 .02H
j.OOb
0.020
Q.G20
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
006
OU5K
005K
005K
005K
008
009
008
008
005K
005K
005K
005
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.015
.005*
.010
.015
.035
.010
.025
.010
.U10
.007
.OObK
.005K
.015
K VALUE KNOrfN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
DATL 7t3/iu/20
370JJAA AS3706XA P001000*
J5 Jb 43.0 082 09 43.0
OLU FOrtT S.T.P.
37039 15 MARION N.C.
T/LAKE JAMES
CUKTIS CHEEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FtET 0EPTH
00630 00625
DATE TIMF D£PFH .>j02kN03 TOT KJEL
FROM OF N-TUTAL N
TO UAV FEET «-
73/U6/37 17 00
73/07/30 11 00
CP-
73/07/30 16 00
73/1)1/06 11 00
CP(D-
73/ 16 00
73/10/1S 11 00
CP(T>-
73/10/1S 16 00
73/11/lrt 11 00
CP(T)-
73/ll/lB 16 00
74/01/31 11 00
0(T>-
74/01/31 16 00
74/02/25 11 00
CP-
74/oa/as 16 oo
74/03/13 (*d 00
CP(T I -
74/03/U 24 oo
74/U4/10 00 00
CP-
7<*/i)4/10 24 00
74/05/07 00 00
om-
74/05/07 £4 00
74/06/11 00 00
CP(T)-
74/06/11 24 00
74/07/10 00 00
CP-
74/07/10 24 00
1.470
0.130
0.029
0.720
0.440
0.040
O.bOU
a.OeiU
C.OHO
0.160
U.16U
0.1/0
6.600
13.8UO
11.500
14.500
15.000
4.300
9.000
9.000
S.300
11.000
20.000
11 .uoo
00610 00671 00665 50051 !>0053
NH3-N PnOS-OIS PHOS-TOT FL(J« CONDUIT
TOTAL ORTHO HATE" FLOW-MOD
MG/L MC/L P MG/L P INST MOD MONTHLY
.500 3.600 4.600 0.180
.3.000
3.100
1.300
1.750
4.900 10.500 0.200 0.260
3.640 2.200 3.100 0.2UO
4.400 6.700
1.730 ' 2.800
3.100 4.500
0.280
2.940 3.500 4.200 0.280
0.100 3.000 3.30u 0.260
3.450 2.100 3.200 0.200
3.900 3.900 5.000 0.250
U.230
3.750 1.600 4.400 U.230
3.600 3.000 5.500 0.230
0.250
0.230
-------
STOWET KEThUt'VAL OAlt
370bXA Ab370a*A P001000*
35 3b 43.0 U8£ 09 <+3.0
ULJ FOKT b.T.P.
37039 15 MArtlON N.C.
T/LAK£ JAMtS
CUHTIi CRLEK
lltPALES 21<*120<+
<» 0000 FttT DE^Tri
DATE
FKUM
TO
TlMf OE^IH 'xU?.sM(J3
UK N-fOfAL
UAY FEET MG/L
00 00
24 00
TOT K..JEL
N
MG/L
UJ610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PHOS-OIS
00665
PHOS-TOT
50051
FLU*
UKTHO ti&it
MG/L
p
MG/L
P
1Mb
r
MGD
500b3
CONDUIT
FLUw-MGU
MONT
HLY
0.650
1.100
------- |