U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
AWED RESERVOIR
CARROLL AND TUSCARAWS COUNTIES
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 393
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&GPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
ATWOD RESERVOIR
CARROLL AND TUSCARAWS COUNTIES
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 393
Wl"m THE COOPERATION OF THE
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND THE
OHIO NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, J375
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Ohio Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 14
VI. Appendices 15
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
. i r
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c}], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S, Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency for professional involvement, to the Ohio National Guard
for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Ohio wastewater treatment plant operators who provided
effluent samples and flow data.
Ned Williams, Director, and Tom Birch, Ken Carr, Larry
Dietrick, Ron Havlice, Larry Korecko, Rod Men!hop, Terry Wheeler,
and John Youger, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Dana L. Stewart, then the Adjutant General
of Ohio, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel Robert C. Timmons,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Ohio National Guards-
men, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to
the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OHIO
LAKE NAME
Atwood
Beach City
Berlin
Buckeye
Charles Mill
Deer Creek
Delaware
Dillon
Grand Lake of St. Marys
Grant
Holiday
Hoover
Indian
Loramie
Mosquito Creek
O'Shaughnessy
Pymatuning
Pleasant Hill
Rocky Fork
Shawnee
Tappan
COUNTY
Carroll, Tuscarawas
Stark, Tuscarawas
Mahoning, Portage,
Fairfield, Licking
Ashland, Richland
Fayette, Pickaway
Delaware
Muskingum
Auglaize,
Brown
Huron
Delaware,
Logan
Auglaize,
Trumbull
Delaware
Ashtabula,
Ashland,
Highland
Greene
Harrison
Stark
Perry
Mercer
Franklin
Shelby
OH; Crawford, PA
Richland
-------
AT WOOD RESERVOIR
Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
Land Subject To Inundation
. Harrisburg
v.
A T WOOD
RESERVOIR
Ohio
-N
Map Location
-------
ATWOOD RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 3928
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Atwood Reservoir 1s eutrophic
It ranked first in overall trophic quality when the 20 Ohio
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of
six lake parameters*. None of the lakes had less median total
phosphorus or median dissolved phosphorus, two had less median
inorganic nitrogen, six had less mean chlorophyll a_, and one
had greater mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked depression
of dissolved oxygen occurred with depth at station 1 in July-
Survey limnologists noted high numbers of algae at stations
3 and 4 in April and moderate numbers at station 3 in October.
Dense submerged vegetation was observed near the shorelines at
stations 2 and 3 in October.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate the reservoir was pho^horus
limited at the time the sample was taken (04/20/73). The reser-
voir data also indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling sta-
tions and times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point-sources--More than 24% of the total phosphons load
reaching Atwood Reservoir during the sampling year was contributed
by the Carroll ton wastewater treatment plant. Septic tanks were
estimated to have contributed 0.5% of the total phosphorus load.
* See Appendix A.
-------
In addition, two industrial point sources discharge to
the reservoir via Town Creek/Indian Fork (see page 10). Although
no information is available on the nutrient contributions of
these sources, they are of probable significance as indicated by
the high phosphorus export rate of Indian Fork (see discussion
of non-point sources below).
The present loading of 1.67 g P/m2/yr is more than 2.5 times
that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as
a eutrophic loading (see page 13). A 100% reduction of the phos-
phorus from the listed point sources would reduce the loading to
1.26 g/m2/yr. Although this loading would still exceed the eutro-
phic loading, the reduction should at least help slow the rate of
deterioration now occurring in the reservoir, particularly if a
significant portion of the phosphorus export of Indian Creek also
can be controlled.
2. Non-point sources—The phosphorus load from non-point
sources was estimated to be 75.1% of the total reaching the reser-
voir during the sampling year. Indian Fork contributed 62.1%;
Pleasant Valley Run, 2.5%; and Willow Run, 1.7%. Minor tributaries
and immediate drainage contributed an estimated 7.8% of the total.
Indian Fork appeared to be impacted by sources other than non-
point; i.e., the phosphorus export rate was a high 106 kg/km2/yr
(see page 13). This rate is much greater than the rates of the
other tributaries; e.g., Pleasant Valley Run (12 kg/km2/yr) and
-------
Willow Run (9 kg/km2/yr); and indicates that the industrial point
sources probably are significant contributors to the total phos-
phorus load to the reservoir. ,
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 6.23 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 4.7 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >8.2 meters,
4. Volume: 29.281 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 178 days (based on outlet flow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (j
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Atwood Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from four stations on the lake and from one or more depths at each
station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-inte-
grated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from
the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and
during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample
was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 8.2 meters at station 1, 4.6 meters
at station 2, 1.8 meters at station 3, and near-surface only at sta-
tion 4.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP tC>
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PM (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P fMG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L>
N02*N03 (MG/L>
AMMONIA (MG/LI
KJEL N (MG/L)
1NORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCKI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING < 4/20/73)
4 SITES
RANGE
10.0 - 13.8
10.0 - 12.0
220. - 450,
7.9 - 8.6
37. - 46.
0.013 - 0.050
0.003 - 0.007
0.730 - 0.970
0.030 - 0.090
0.200 - 0.500
0.770 - 1.060
1.030 - 1.470
5.2 - 13.4
0.3 - 1.7
292.
8.4
39.
MEAN MEDIAN
12.2 12.7
10.8 10.4
263.
8.4
37.
0.020 0.017
0.004 0.004
0.893 0.91S
0.044 0.040
0.340
0.937
1.233
8.6
1.1
0.3SO
0.955
1.185
7.8
1.1
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR ATWOOD RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 3928
2ND SAMPLING ( 7/30/73)
4 SITES
RANGE
17.7 - 28.6
0.3 - 13.1
244. - 343.
7,4 - 9.4
45. - 69.
0.022 - 0.088
0.004 - 0.011
0.050 - 0.120
0.060 - 0.940
0.400 - l.SOO
0.110 - 1.060
0.490 • 1.620
8.0 - 61.8
0.4 - 1.2
3RD SAMPLING (10/ a/73)
4 SITES
MEAN
24.7
6.9
285.
8.1
50.
0.040
0.007
0.081
0.164
0.710
0.265
0.791
24.6
0.8
MEDIAN
25.0
7.8
271.
a.o
47.
0.033
0.006
0.080
0.090
0.600
0.170
0.680
14.2
0.8
RANGE
la.i
5.4
259.
7.5
52.
0.031
0.004
0.040
0.040
0.300
0.090
0.400
5.9
0.7
- 20.1
9.0
- 404.
e.4
61.
- 0.096
- 0.009
- 0.130
- 0.110
- 1.400
• 0.210
- 1.490
- 40.6
1.2
MEAN
19.3
6.9
287.
7.8
55.
0.0*5
0.005
0.092
0.066
0.650
0.159
0.742
16.2
1.0
MEDIAN
19.6
6.4
261.
7.8
55.
0.036
0.005
0.09S
0.070
0.600
0.160
0.700
9.1
1.1
-------
B. B1ol1g1cal characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/20/73
07/30/73
10/08/73
2. Chlorophyll a. -
Sampli ng
Date
04/20/73
07/30/73
10/08/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Meloslra sp.
2. Crvptomonas sp.
3. Centric diatoms
4. Synedra s^.
5. Flagellates
Other genera
Total
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Raphidiopsis sp.
Melosira sp.
Flagellates
Achnanthes sp.
Cryptomonas sjj.
Other genera
Total
1. Melosira sp.
2. Raphidiopsis sp.
3. Oscillator-fa sp.
4. Nltzschia sT.
5. Flagellates
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
01
02
03
04
01
02
03
04
Algal Units
per ml
973
608
480
302
262
773
3,398
20,937
1,251
364
364
364
313
1,513
4,169
Chlorophyll
Cug/1)
10.3
13.4
5.4
5.2
8.1
8.0
20.4
61.8
10.1
8.1
5.9
40.6
-------
8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (rng/1) Cone, (mq/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control 0.032 0.478 3.6
0.050 P 0.082 0.478 17.0
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.082 1.478 21.2
1.0 N 0.032 1.478 3.6
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Atwood Reservoir was moderately high at the time the
sample was collected (04/20/73). There was a significant
increase in yield when orthophosphorus was added but a lack
of yield response when nitrogen alone was added. Based on
these results, phosphorus limitation is indicated.
The reservoir data also indicate phosphorus limitation;
i.e., the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were
18/1 or greater at all sampling stations and times.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Ohio National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Ohio District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at stations B-l and C-l and multiplying
the means by the ZZ area in km2.
The operator of the Carroll ton wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Name
Carroll ton
Pop.
Served
2,900
,t
Treatment
trickling
filter
Mean Flow
(m'/d)
1,177.8**
Receiving
Water
Town Creek
2. Known industrial - There are at least two industrial dis-
charges within the watershed - Affiliated Hospital Products and
01 in Corporation - which impact Town Creek. Nutrient loads from
these sources are not known but probably are significant (see
page 2).
* Rainsberger, 1974.
** Includes industrial wastes.
t Youger, 1975.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Indian Fork 6,445 62.1
Willow Run 175 1.7
Pleasant Valley Run 255 2.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 815 7.8
c. Known municipal STP's -
Carrollton 2,525 24.3
d. Septic tanks* - 55 0.5
e. Known industrial -
Affiliated Hospital Prod. ?
01 in Corp. ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 110 1.1
Total 10,380 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Indian Fork 3,625
3. Net annual P accumulation - 6,755 kg.
* Estimate based on 200 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Indian Fork 65,740 48.5
Willow Run 5,930 4.3
Pleasant Valley Run 13,070 9.6
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 35,745 26.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Carroll ton 6,250 4.6
d. Septic tanks* - 2,130 1.6
e. Known industrial -
Affiliated Hospital Prod. ?
01 in Corp. ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 6,725 5.0
Total 135,590 -100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Indian Fork 99,260
3. Net annual N accumulation - 36,330 kg.
* Estimate based on 200 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdralnage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Indian Fork 106 1,085
Willow Run 9 314
Pleasant Valley Run 12 641
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 1.67 1.08 21.8 5.8
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Atwood Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.60
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.30
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Rainsberger, Ira, 1974. Treatment plant questionnaire (Carrollton
STP). Carroll ton.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974, The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Pub!. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Youger, John, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry;
review of preliminary report). OH Env. Prot. Agency, Columbus,
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3901 BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
3902 BUCKETS LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL RESERVOIR
3906 DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
3907 DELAWARE RESERVOIR
390d OILCION RESE«VOI«
3912 GRANT LAKE
391* HOOVER RESERVOIR
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LOHAHIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO CREEn RESERVOIR
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
3937 LAKE SAINT
BERLIN RESEKVOIrf
3930 HOLlDAf LAKE
»OCKY FORK LAKE
J'-Jlt r APR AN LAct
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.122
0.179
0.127
0.098
0.086
0.163
0.113
0.040
0.120
0.185
0.058
0.036
0.1*8
0.031
0.0*2
0.125
0.20i(
O.Qb7
0.0 b^
0.0*0
MEDIAN
INO^G N
1.990
0.380
0.465
2.980
2.3*0
1.590
0.570
1.6*0
0.380
1.380
0.150
0.455
0.200
0.205
0.900
0.575
3.070
0.790
2.360
0.240
SCO-
MEAN SEC
489.000
490.000
482.555
470.125
404.111
481.250
486.333
462.750
485.222
494.000
465,333
456.833
484.167
462.000
465.435
465.333
479. J33
473.000
474.333
4bb.lll
MEAN
CHLOKA
10.867
186.567
67.144
9.887
10.856
27.400
40.533
13.017
76.855
104.100
36.267
22.850
79.150
lb.442
15.496
55.350
5.522
38.022
39.567
37.711
15-
MIN DO
11.600
9.600
IS. 000
13.900
14.500
14.300
12.200
14.800
14.200
8.200
11.600
14.700
8.200
14.700
13.600
15.000
14.900
15.000
15.000
15.000
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
0.015
0.020
0.011
0.036
0.024
0.037
0.019
0.008
0.012
0.019
0.006
0.010
0.01*
0.005
0.006
0.034
0.159
0.010
O.OU9
0.007
-------
PERCENT of L^ES mm HIGHER VALUES
OF LAKES WITH HIGMEK
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3901 6EACH CITY H
3902 BUCKEYE LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL «ESEHVOIW
390& DEE* CREEK RESEWVOIR
3907 DELAWARE RESE^VOl*
3908 OILLION RE5ERV01H
3913 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESERVUI*
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LOHAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO C»EEK RESERVOIR
392*. PLEASANT niLL LAKE
3987 LAKE SAINT MAKYS
3928 ATrfOOO KESEHVOIR
3929 bEHLIN RESERVOIR
3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
3V31 O'SHAUGNESST HESt&VOIP
3933 ROCKY FORK LAKE
3933 SHAWNEE LAKE
TAPPAN
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
37 (
11 t
26 (
53 <
58 (
16 <
47 <
87 (
42 <
5 <
7* t
95 (
21 <
100 (
79 <
32 (
0 (
68 <
63 (
87 (
71
2)
5)
10)
11)
3)
91
16)
8)
1)
14)
18>
4)
19)
15)
b)
0)
13)
1?)
16)
MEDIAN
iNCMi N
21 t
76 (
63 <
5 (
16 (
3? <
58 t
26 (
16 (
37 (
100 (
6« (
95 (
69 t
42 t
53 (
0 (
47 (
11 (
84 (
4)
14)
12)
1)
3)
6)
11)
5)
14)
7)
19)
13)
16)
17)
8)
10)
0)
9)
2>
16)
SOU-
MEAN SEC
11 <
5 (
J7 (
63 (
J2 <
42 t
16 (
89 (
21 <
0 (
62 (
100 (
26 (
95 (
74 <
82 (
47 (
58 <
53 <
68 I
2)
1)
7)
12)
6)
u)
3)
17)
4)
0)
IS)
19)
5)
ia*
14)
Ib)
9)
11)
10)
13)
MEAN
CrtLOHA
e)4 I
0 (
21 (
95 (
89 (
58 <
32 <
79 1
16 (
S <
53 (
63 (
11 <
68 (
74 t
26 <
100 <
42 {
37 (
47 <
16)
0)
4)
18)
17)
in
6)
1S>
3)
1)
10)
12>
2)
13)
14)
S)
19)
at
7t
9)
lb-
MlN DO
82 (
89 (
" f
63 <
47 <
53 (
74 {
32 t
58 (
97 (
82 (
39 <
97 1
39 (
68 (
11 <
26 (
11 I
11 (
11 I
1S>
17>
0)
12)
9)
10)
14)
6)
11)
18)
IS)
7)
18)
7)
13)
0)
5>
0)
0)
0)
MEDIAN
DIS5 OrtTHO P
42 (
26 (
58 (
11 <
21 (
5 (
34 (
79 <
S3 (
34 (
92 (
66 <
47 (
100 (
92 I
16 (
0 1
66 (
74 (
84 (
8)
5)
11)
2)
4)
1)
6)
1S>
10)
6)
17)
12)
9)
19)
17)
3>
0)
12)
14)
16)
INUEX
NO
277
207
216
290
263
206
261
392
266
178
483
431
297
491
429
220
173
292
249
3al
-------
LAKES RANKED BY
LAKE CODE LAKE NAHE
1 392d
£ 3921
3 3'-J?<»
F^UE* NO
5
6 3934
7 3927
tt 3^32
9 3906
10 3901
11 391S
12 3907
13 3-*R
1*> 3J33
15 3930
16 3905
17 3902
18 3908
19 3917
20 3931
MOSUUITO C«L£H
PLEASANT MILL LAKE
TAPPAN LA^t
LA«,E SAINT MAHYS
ROC^Y FOkK LAKE
DEES CPEEK RESERVOIR
BEACH CITf KtSERvojst
INDIAN LArvt
OELAKARE RESERVOIR
GRANT LAKE
SHArfNEE LAKE
HOLIDAY LAKE
CHARLtS MILL RESEWVOlft
HUCKEfE LAKE
DILLION RESEHVOIft
LORAM1E LAKE
O'SrlAUGNESST RESEWVOIH
39?
381
297
290
277
?6b
263
261
220
216
207
206
178
173
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TKIbUTAKY FLOW INFORMATION FOR OHIO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 3938
ATWOOD
TOTAL DRAINAGE AfttA OF LAKEISQ KM)
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAtSQ KM)
JAN
FEH
1H1.0
M4k
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOrtS
JON JUL AUCi
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
3928Ai
3928A2
3928B1
3928C1
392BH
181. (J
60.6
18.9
20.4
81.3
2.69
I.Ob
0.31
0.34
1.44
2.80
1.27
0.40
0.42
1.76
4.02
1.50
0.48
0.51
1.98
3.65
1.19
0.40
0.42
U61
2.61
0.71
0.22
0.24
0.93
1.50
U.40
0.12
U. 13
0.54
0.96
0.2S
0.08
0.08
O.J4
0.61
0.18
O.Ob
0.06
0.26
0.37
0.13
0.03
0.04
0.18
0.82
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.16
1.73
0.28
0.08
0.09
0.40
2.10
O.S9
0.18
0.20
0.82
1.97
0.64
0.20
0.21
0.86
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKt =
SUM OF SUS-OHAlNAGE AREAS =
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS ANO UAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEA*
3928Ai
MEAN FLOW DAY
392BA2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
4.02
1.33
0.34
0.51
ti.21
0.62
5.55
5.83
5.35
2.55
0.68
6.97
1.22
0.43
0.22
0.17
0.10
0.31
1.13
1.44
4.S9
0.68
1.44
l.»Jl
5
9
14
11
12
I'.
11
8
12
13
10
21
5
9
14
11
12
14
11
b
12
13
10
21
lai.o
181.2
FLOW DAY
1.64
2.04
0.2b
0.28
U.16
0.54
ltt.62
1.41
o.ie
1.81
b.OS
2.21
0.74
0.42
0.14
0.07
0.07
0.34
0.34
0.48
O.il
0.59
1.73
0.51
27
24
27
24
SUMMAKY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.07
1.42
0.65
1.02
23.04
23.7b
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR OHIO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 39?6
ATWOOD RtStKVOIH
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILV FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH Y£Ak MEAN FLOW DAf
392bBl
392BC1
3928ZZ
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7J
74
74
74
74
0.40
0.14
0.07
O.US
0.03
0.08
0.34
0.42
1.36
0.22
0,45
0.59
0.42
0.15
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.09
0.37
0.48
1.47
0.23
0.48
0.65
1.61
0.62
0.28
0.2S
0.15
0.42
1.S9
1.9B
£.31
0.93
5
9
14
11
12
14
11
a
12
13
10
21
5
9
14
11
12
14
11
8
12
13
10
21
11
FLOW DAY
o.u
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.22
0.14
0.05
0.0
0.01
0.09
0.11
0.15
0.16
0.19
0.54
0.16
0.24
0.14
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.10
0.12
0.16
U.17
0.20
0.59
0.17
27
24
27
24
0.20
0.31
0.22
0.34
2.46
-------
APPENDIX'D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOHET HETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
392601
40 31 47.0 oei 16 28.0
ATWUOU RESERVOIR
391^7 OHIO
uuUlu
OAIE
F»OM
TO
7J/04/20
73/07/30
73/10/OH
UAft
FNOH
TO
7J/J4/2U
7j/u7/3u
7j/10/ J"
flME DEPTH
OF
DAY FtET
IS 30 0000
lb 30 OOob
IS 30 oulb
15 30 0022
15 25 0000
15 25 OOOb
15 ?5 u015
15 ?5 u027
14 "*0 OJOO
| /. {.ft .1 rt 1 ^
1 •+ <*u UU 1 J
14 40 0024
TI^E OtPTH t
O^
(JAY FEET
lb 30 0000
15 .10 0006
IS JO 0015
lb JO 0022
15 2b uOOo
'5 ?b 01*05
15 25 uOia
15 25 0027
14 40 0000
i4 40 0015
14 40 0024
*ATE«
ftMP
CL«T
13.2
11. 4
10 .-i
10.0
25.2
24.5
24.2
17.7
20.1
\ Cl l3
1 *• • o
1>*.7
00665
'H03-TUI
MG/L r
u.Olr^
j.Uio
C . o32
0.020
J.02J
0.026
U.l/22
•J.Ob/
(*.032
o , o j i
OJ077 OOOSI4
UU ThANbP CuDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
HG/L INCntS MICKOMHO
11.6
10.B
11.3
5.B
0.3
S.b
a.6
5.4
3221 f
p>
A
J/
lu. J
".1
10.1
66
46
40
255
275
270
267
266
244
260
259
361
llfALES
3
iQ4oO
PH
su
ti.50
U.40
d.10
7.90
7.90
7.90
7.50
7.40
7.60
7.30
7.50
00410
T ALK
CACU3
MG/L
J7
37
37
37
4f
4?
4S
69
52
53
52
2111202
0026
OU610
NH3-N
TOTAL
HG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.110
0.090
0.140
0,940
0.040
0.070
0.070
FtET DEPTH
00625
ToT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200*
0.200
0.200
0.500
0.500
0.400
1.500
0.300
0.300
0.600
00630
N02*,N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.93(1
0.920
0.930
0.960
0.080
0.080
0.090
0.120
0.100
0.130
0.120
00671
PHOS-D1S
ORTHO
HG/L P
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.009
0.007
0.010
0.004
0.004
0.006
K VALUE KNO*N TO HE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
392803
40 33 28.0 061 15 12.0
ATWOOO RESERVOIR
39019 OHIO
00010
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT
73/04/20 16 15 0000 13.8
16 15 0005 13.0
73/07/30 17 25 0000 25.7
17 25 0004 25.0
73/10/08 14 00 0000 19.2
14 00 0006 18.4
00300 00077 00094
00 TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCH1 FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
10.4
8.2
9,0
7.2
28
46
410
450
343
330
286
404
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.40
8.50
B.60
a. 10
8.20
8.00
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
45
46
47
48
56
56
2111202
0009
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.04U
0.080
0.080
0.050
U.040
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.900
0.700
0.800
0.600
00630
NQ2&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.760
0.730
0.080
0.080
0.040
0.080
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.003
0.003
O.OOS
0.004
0.006
0.005
00663 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P JG/L
73/04/20 16 15 0000 0.015 5.4
16 15 0005 0.019
73/07/30 17 25 0000 0.037 20.4
17 25 0004 0.043
73/10/08 14 00 0000 b.0<*5 5.9
14 00 0006 0.036
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
392B04
40 33 36.0 081 12 27.
ATriOOJ RESEHVOIR
39019 OHIO
DATE
FHOM
TO
73/04/20
73/07/30
73/1U/08
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 35 0000
17 40 0000
13 45 0000
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
13.0
28.6
18.1
00300 00077
00 TftANSP Cf>
SECCHl FIELD
MG/L INCHES Ml
10.0
13.1
8.6
12
14
28
11EPALES
3
2111202
0005 FEET
DEPTH
94
TVY
1
MHO
220
314
304
00400
PH
SU
8.30
9.40
8.40
00*10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
40
54
61
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.090
O.ObO
0.070
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.700
1.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.970
0.090
0.090
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.007
0.006
0.009
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PH05-TOT CMLUPMrL
FrtOM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/04/20 16 35 0000 U.050 5.2
73/07/30 17 40 0000 0.088 61.8
73/10/08 13 45 0000 0.046 40.6
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 7SY02/i>3
40 Jl 33.0 C81 It 10.0
INDIAN FUKK
39011 7.5 MINEKAL CITY
0/ATWUOD HEbErtVUltf
0AM bPILLhAY 1.5 M SE OF NtW CUMBERLAND
ilEPALtS 2U1204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
TO
73/05/05
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/08/11
73/1)9/12
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/08
74/01/12
74/02/13
7<*/02/27
74/uj/lO
74/03/2*+
7<*/04/2l
TIME OtPTr
OF
UAY Ft£T
15
U9
IS
13
13
09
11
09
10
14
14
14
09
1**
00
40
15
45
37
45
15
53
04
25
50
00
15
00
00630 00625
•( N026.N03 TOT KJEL
i^-10TAL N
MG/L
0
0
t)
(1
u
0
0
u
0
1
1
1
1
0
.770
.026
.0^9
.030
.040
* 154
.072
.340
.880
.200
.340
.260
. l^J
.920
MG/L
0.
1.
2.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
U*
0.
0.
0.
900
380
500
600
470
5UO
500
500
900
500
500
500
500
400
xH/610 00671 OU665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHGb-Tur
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
046
013
690
920
050
050
028
036
112
0/5
045
060
03t)
030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
J*
p
005f\
005K
014
014
016
024
012
008
OOSK
010
old
010
010
005
Mti/L P
G.OJ5
0.022
0.060
u.125
0.^40
0.030
0.025
0.040
0.025
0.040
O.u&O
O.UaU
0.025
U.U35
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STUrtET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3928A2
40 33 57.0 081 07 50.0
INDIAN r-'OKK
39 7.5
1/ftTWOOD
FROM tiANK OFF ST HT 39 2 Ml NE OF TABOK
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
. TO
73/05/05
73/06/Ov
73/07/14
73/08/11
73/09/12
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/OH
74/01/12
74/02/ 13
74/02/27
74/uj/lu
74/03/24
74/04/21
00630 00625
TIME. DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
GAY FEET
15
10
15
14
14
10
11
10
11
14
15
14
09
14
40
11
SO
30
03
20
56
21
30
50 ' '
10
30
45
25
M(i/L
1
0
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
.200
.920
.600
.920
.660
.020
.800
.900
.640
,6uO
. IriO
.430
.320
.500
MG/L
5.
1.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
u.
1.
0.
6.
050
650
200
800
R60
450
950
700
900
bOO
600
700
500
ouo
00610
NH1-N h
TOTAL
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
1.
105
on
256
560
450
100
216
200
232
095
105
060
060
100
00671 00665
•"HOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
f
017
005K
680
760
530
115
370
128
060
060
075
045
050
055
M6/L P
0.810
0.25C
0.890
1.250
0.685
0.330
0.565
0.260
. 0.160
0.140
0.1 7S
0.280
0.110
0 . 1 45
K VALUE KNOWN TO tit
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
392861
40 35 10.0 081 11 25.0
wlLLOW RUN
39 7.5 DELROY
T/ATWUOO RESERVOIR
2NDRY RO 8HOG 2 Ml N OF OELLKOY
11EPALES 2111304
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/05
73/06/09
73/07/14
73/09/12
73/10/14
73/U/ll
73/12/08
7^/01/12
7W02/13
74/02/27
74/03/10
74/03/2**
OJ630 00625
TIME DEPTH M>2«>N03 TOT KJEL
OK N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
16
10
16
14
10
12
10
12
14
15
14
10
10
30
20
45
40
14
41
00
05
30
50
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
.430
.012
.170
.168
.230
.58H
.756
.792
.704
.740
.720
.672
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
770
420
890
610
650
100K
100
100
200
200
625
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TUT
TOTAL OHTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
044
005K
063
053
062
028
032
032
025
025
020
025
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
006
023
Oil
010
012
016
005K
005
005
005
010
MG/L P
0.020
0.025
0.025
0.06U
O.Olb
0.011
0.035
U.01S
0.020
0.030
0.067
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL OAT£ 75/02/03
3928C1
N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
15 30 1.200 1.040
10 05 0.010i\ 1.600
15 40 0.330 1.U50
14 ?3 0.230 1.260
13 57 U.1S4 0.270
10
11
10
12
14
15
14
10
14
07 0.
41 1.
12
47
45
Ob
40
30
*
*
*
*
*
*
20 0.
550
300
6UU
680
600
700
700
600
880
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
000
150
100
600
200
200
500
300
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL URTHO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
0.046 0*006 0.015
0.005K 0.024 O.U45
0.132 0.023 0.080
0.160 0.019 u.085
0.099 0.010 0.060
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
*
*
•
*
*
•
*
*
380
032
028
040
025
020
020
025
015
0.013
0.012
0.012
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.075
0.012
0.012
0.010
0.015
0.030
0.065
0.015
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOHEF WETR1EVAL OATE 75/02/03
3928XA TF3928XA P002900*
tO 34 30.0 081 OS 00.0
CARKOLLTON
39011 250 CANTON
T/ATiiOOU LAKE KESErtYOIK
TOn/N CHEEK
lltPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
KROM
TO
73/09/10
CPID-
73/09/10
73/10/23
CP(TJ-
73/10/23
73/11/37
CP(T>-
73/11/87
7J/12/ la
CP(T>-
73/12/18
74/01/24
CP < T > -
74/01/29
74/02/20
CP(T)-
74/02/20
74/03/23
CPU)-
74/u3/23
74/04/26
CP(f»-
7H/U4/26
74/05/23
CP < T > -
74/Ob/2J
74/06/20
CPU1-
74/06/20
74/07/25
CPITI-
7W07/2S
74/06/23
CP < H -
00630
TIME DEPTH N02(wN03
OF N- TOTAL
DAY FEET Md/L
08
15
OA
15
OS
15
oa
15
08
Ib
08
15
OS
15
03
15
OB
15
08
15
07
15
08
00
00
00
00
00
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
6.400
U.3UU
7.000
H.200
7.200
5.200
5.700
11.800
9.9JO
9.60U
9.800
10.100
00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
TUT KJEL NH3-N PMOS-DIS PHOS-FOT FLO* CONDUIT
N TOTAL IMTnO HATE FLO»-HGD
HG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INSI «GD MONTHLY
13,200 u.b'30
8.000 6.075
2.hOO 0.260 3.200
9.100 0.077 4.300
4.200 0.320 3.200
7.700 1.060 4.400
l.OOOK 0.590 J.100
6.300 0.300 4.600
6.000 «.370 4.000
B.300 0.05y 5.950
H.100 0.210 6.500
12.000 0.150 7.000
9
6
4
6
4
b
3
6
5
7
8
6
.050
.700
.300
.500
.100
.300
.530
.100
.400
.100
.100
.600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.190
.235
.360
.350
.490
.370
.480
.250
.430
.2bO
.175
.210
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
.250
.230
.300
.3:30
.450
.350
.390
.400
.370
.210
.170
.230
15 00
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LtSS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
392bAA TF3928XA P002900»
40 34 30.0 OBI 05 00.0
CArtROLLTON
39011 2SO CANTON
T/ATwOOD LAKE RESERVOIR
T04N CREEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
74/09/27
CPIT>-
74/09/27
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
Ut» H
15 00
00630
N02«.N03
N-TOTAL
HG/L
8.600
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
8.400
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.140
00671
^HOS-DIS
ORTriO
MG/L P
6.750
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
7. SOO
50051
FLO*
RATE
1NST MGO
0.300
50053
CONDUIT
FLOw-MGO
MONJHLY
0.315
------- |