U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&GPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
BEACH CITY RESBMHR
STARK AND TUSCAMMS COUNTIES
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 394
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND THE
OHIO NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 3975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Ohio Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 15
VI. Appendices 16
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study 'lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [5303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey {Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency for professional involvement, to the Ohio National Guard
for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Ohio wastewater treatment plant operators who provided
effluent samples and flow data.
Ned Williams, Director, and Tom Birch, Ken Carr, Larry
Dietrick, Ron Havlice, Larry Korecko, Rod Mehlhop, Terry Wheeler,
and John Youger, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Dana L. Stewart, then the Adjutant General
of Ohio, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel Robert C. Timmons,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Ohio National Guards-
men, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to
the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OHIO
LAKE NAME
Atwood
Beach City
Berlin
Buckeye
Charles Mill
Deer Creek
Delaware
Dillon
Grand Lake of St.
Grant
Holiday
Hoover
Indian
Loramie
Mosquito Creek
O'Shaughnessy
Pymatuning
Pleasant Hill
Rocky Fork
Shawnee
Tappan
Marys
COUNTY
Carroll, Tuscarawas
Stark, Tuscarawas
Mahoning, Portage, Stark
Fairfield, Licking, Perry
Ashland, Richland
Fayette, Pickaway
Delaware
Muskingurn
Auglaize, Mercer
Brown
Huron
Delaware, Franklin
Logan
Auglaize, Shelby
Trumbull
Delaware
Ashtabula, OH; Crawford, PA
Ashland, Richland
Highland
Greene
Harrison
-------
8200
I
BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
<8> Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
.X) Drainage Area Boundary
f!f Land Subject To Inundation
? _JoKm.
' ' 5 Mi.
Scale
Map Location
-------
BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 3901
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data Indicate that Beach City Reservoir 1s eutrophic.
It ranked tenth in overall trophic quality when the 20 Ohio lakes
sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six param-
eters*. Twelve of the lakes had less median total phosphorus,
11 had less median dissolved phosphorus, 15 had less median
inorganic nitrogen, three had less mean chlorophyll a_, and 17
had greater mean Secchi disc transparency. Dissolved oxygen
in the July near-surface sample was only 439S of saturation.
The Survey limnologists reported extensive stands of rooted
submergent and emergent aquatic plants along the shoreline.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Beach City Reservoir
was phosphorus limited when the sample was collected (07/30/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The phosphorus contribution of the listed
point sources amounted to about 10% of the load reaching Beach
City Reservoir during the sampling year. The wastewater treat-
* See Appendix A.
-------
ment plants at Brewster and Smithville were estimated to have
contributed 5.0% and 3.7% of this total, respectively. Septic
tanks serving Beach City, lakeshore dwellings, campsites, and
parks were estimated to have contributed 1.2%.
Fifteen industrial point sources, many of which are of
probable nutrient significance, discharge to Sugar Creek, North
Fork, Middle Fork, South Fork, and East Branch (see page 10).
No information is available on the nutrient contributions of
these sources; however, the loads are included in those meas-
ured at stations A-2, C-l, D-l, J-l, and K-l, respectively.
In addition, the community of Sugar Creek was served by septic
tanks during the Survey sampling year but is now served by a
wastewater treatment plant which discharges into Sugar Creek
(see pages 9-10). A more-detailed study is needed to determine
the nutrient impact of all of these sources.
The present phosphorus loading of 27.15 g/m2/yr is 12 times
that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974)
as a eutrophic loading (see page 14). Although Vollenweider's
model may not be applicable to lakes with short hydraulic reten-
tion times, the existing trophic condition of the reservoir is
evidence of excessive nutrient loads. Because this water body
is phosphorus limited, all phosphorus inputs to Beach City Reser-
voir should be minimized to the greatest practicable extent to
at least slow the present rate of eutrophication.
-------
2. Non-point sources—About 90% of the total annual phos-
phorus input to Beach City Reservoir is attributed to non-point
sources. The South Fork of Sugar Creek contributed 29.7%; Sugar
Creek, 23.0%; the East Branch of Sugar Creek, 9.555; the Middle
Fork of Sugar Creek, 9.1%; and the six remaining gaged tributar-
ies collectively contributed 11.5% of the total phosphorus input.
Ungaged tributaries were estimated to have contributed 7.3% of
the total load.
The phosphorus export rates of Sugar Creek (59 kg/km2/yr),
North Fork (51 kg/km2/yr), South Fork (153 kg/kmz/yr), and East
Branch (62 kg/km2/yr) are quite high in comparison to the other
sampled tributaries in this drainage basin (see page 13) and
the tributaries of neighboring water-bodies. For example, the
mean of the phosphorus export rates of Pleasant Hill Reservoir*
tributaries was 11 kg/km2/yr (range of 5 to 16 kg/km2/yr); the
mean of the phosphorus export rates of Berlin Reservoir* trib-
utaries was 26 kg/km2/yr (range of 14 to 53 kg/km2/yr); and
the mean of the phosphorus export rates of the unimpacted trib-
utaries of Atwood Reservoir* was 10 kg/km2/yr (range of 9 to 12
kg/km2/yr). The high export rates indicate that phosphorus
loads from unsampled point sources probably contribute signifi-
cantly to the total load to Beach City Reservoir.
Working Paper No. 408, No. 395, and No. 393, respectively.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICST
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 1.70 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 1.2 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 3.0 meters.
4. Volume: 2.040 x 10s m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 3 days (based on outlet flow),
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Sugar Creek
Elm Run
North Fk., Sugar Creek
Middle Fk., Sugar Creek
Unnamed Stream (E-l)
Indian Trail Creek
Goose Creek
Walnut Creek
South Fk., Sugar Creek
East Branch, Sugar Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Total s
2. Outlet -
Sugar Creek
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 106.3 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 97.8 centimeters.
Drainage
area (km2)*
180.8
11.4
44.5
114.0
10.6
35.0
15.8
34.4
89.9
70.7
168.2
775.3
Mean flow
(m3/sec)*
1.8
0.1
0.4
1.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.7
1.6
7.6
777.0**
7.2
t Table of metric equivalents—Appendix B.
tt Youger, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUWARY
Beach City Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
one or more depths at one station on the lake (see map, page v). Dur-
ing each visit, a single depth-integrated (near bottom to surface)
sample was collected for phytoplankton identification and enumeration;
and a similar sample was collected for chlorophyll a_ analysis. During
the second visit, an 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was collected
for algal assays. The maximum depth sampled was 1.8 meters.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02*N03 (MG/LI
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF pnvsicAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/30/73)
1 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 3901
2ND SAMPLING ( 7/30/73)
1 SITES
3RU SAMPLING <10/ 6/73)
1 SITES
RANGE
15.4
7.5
470.
8.2
36.
0.085
0.009
2.700
0.120
0.400
2.820
3.100
4.3
0.3
- 15.8
7.5
- 470.
8.2
40.
- 0.093
- 0.017
- 2.800
- 0.160
- o.eoo
- 2.960
- 3.600
4.3
0.3
MEAN
15.6
7.5
470.
8.2
38.
0.089
0.013
2.750
0.140
0.600
2.890
3. 350
4.3
0.3
MEDIAN
15.6
7.5
470.
8.2
38.
0.089
0.013
2.750
0.140
0.600
2.890
3.350
4.3
0.3
RANGE
24.2
3.4
439.
7.4
102.
0.281
0.033
1.610
0.380
1.300
1.990
2.910
19.4
0.2
- 24.2
3.4
- 439.
7.4
- 102.
- 0.281
- 0.033
- 1.610
- 0.380
- 1.300
- 1.990
- 2.910
- 19.4
0.2
MEAN
24.2
3.4
439.
7.4
102.
0.281
0.033
1.610
0.380
1.300
1.990
2.910
19.4
0.2
MEDIAN
24.2
3.4
439.
7.4
102.
0.281
0.033
1.610
0.380
1.300
1.990
2.910
19.4
0.2
RANGE
17.5
5.0
748.
7.0
72.
0.122
0,012
0.940
0.360
1.300
1.340
2.240
8.9
0.3
- 17.7
5.0
- 790.
7.2
78.
- 0.142
- 0.015
- 0.980
- 0.400
- 1.600
- 1.340
- 2.580
8.9
0.3
MEAN
17.6
5.0
769.
7.1
75.
0.132
0.013
0.960
0.380
1.4SO
1.340
2.410
8.9
0.3
MEDIAN
17.6
5.0
769.
7.1
75.
0.132
0.013
0.960
0.380
1.450
1.340
2.410
8.9
0.3
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton* -
C.
Sampl 1 ng
Date
04/20/73
10/06/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Synedra sp.
Navicula sp.
Dinobryon sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Anklstrodesmus SJD.
Other genera
Total
Synura sp.
NitzschTa sp.
Scenedesmus sp.
Oscillator la sfi..
Cyclotella sp.
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
203
65
63
38
28
138
535
124
124
100
74
74
521
Total
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station
Date Number
04/20/73 01
07/30/73 01
10/06/73 01
Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/11
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
1,017
Chlorophyll a_
(ug/D
4.3
19.4
8.9
Maximum yield
(mq/1-dry wt.)
0.020
0.070
0.070
0.020
0.762
0.762
1.762
1.762
12.8
25.2
27.9
13.6
* The July phytoplankton sample was lost in shipment.
-------
8
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Beach City Reservoir was high at the time the sample was
collected (07/30/73). The addition of orthophosphorus alone
produced a significant increase in yield over that of the
control, which shows the sample was phosphorus limited at
that time. Note that the addition of only nitrogen resulted
in a yield which was not significantly greater than that of
the control.
The lake data also indicate phosphorus limitation (the mean
inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 30/1 or greater
at all sampling times).
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Ohio National Guard
collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tributary
sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high runoff month of
March when three samples were collected. Sampling was begun in May, 1973,
and was completed in April, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a "normalized" or-average year were provided by the Ohio
District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary sites
nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer program
for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are those measured
minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage"
("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the nutrient loads, in
kg/km2/year, at stations B-l, E-l, F-l, and G-l and multiplying the means
by the ZZ area in km2.
The communities of Brewster and Smithville did not participate in the
Survey, and nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/
capita/year. The town of Sugar Creek also did not participate. However,
during the sampling year this community was served by septic tanks (Ness,
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
1975), and nutrient loads from this source probably were negligible con-
sidering the distance from the lake.
Nutrient loads from two additional communities - Claycroft Mobile
Park and Eastwood Sewer Service Area - which probably are relatively
insignificant, were not included in the loadings since information on
these sources is not available.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Sugar Creekt
Brewster*
Smithville**
Pop.
Served
2,000
2,020
1,500
Mean Flow
Treatment (m3/d}tt
ext. aer. &
micro-
strainer
trickling
filter
ext. aer.
609.6
764.6
567.8
Receiving
Water
South Fk.,
Sugar Creek
Beach City Res.
Sugar Creek
2. Known industrial*** - At least 15 industries dishcarge to the
Beach City Reservoir drainage basin, many of which are of probable
nutrient significance. Farmerstown Cheese Co., Baltic Rubber and
Plastics, Union Cheese Co., and Belden Brick Co. {2 plants) impact
the South Fork of Sugar Creek. Holmes By-Products, Troyers Trail
Bologna, and a poultry processing plant impact Indian Trail Creek.
Norton Co., Swift Chemical Co., Norfolk and Western Railroad, and
Wilmot Mining Co. impact Sugar Creek. Alpine Cheese Factory,
Kidran Cheese Factory, and Ragersville Dairy impact the Middle
Fork, North Fork, and East Branch of the Sugar River, respectively.
Because data on the discharges are not available, these sources
are not listed on the following loading pages; however, their nutri-
ent loads, if any, are included in the respective tributary loads.
t Plant in operation as of May, 1974 (Ness, 1975).
tt Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
* Anonymous, 1971 (population is 1970 Census).
** Carpenter, 1975.
*** Youger, 1975.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source ^r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Sugar Creek 10,595 23.0
Elm Run 145 0.3
North Fk., Sugar Creek 2,265 4.9
Middle Fk., Sugar Creek 4,215 9.1
Unnamed Stream (E-l) 105 0.2
Indian Trail Creek 1,090 2.4
Goose Creek 410 0.9
Walnut Creek 1,275 2.8
South Fk., Sugar Creek 13,715 29.7
East Branch, Sugar Creek 4,395 9.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 3,365 7.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Smithville 1,700 3.7
Brewster 2,290 5.0
d. Septic tanks* - 560 1.2
e. Industrial - Unknown ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 3p_ <0.1
Total 46,155 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Sugar Creek 38,480
3. Net annual P accumulation - 7,675 kg.
* Estimate based on Beach City (pop. 1,133), 132 lakeshore dwellings,
three parks, and two camps; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/
Source y_r
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Sugar Creek 228,345 26.5
Elm Run 9,895 1.1
North Fk., Sugar Creek 38,965 4.5
Middle Fk., Sugar Creek 97,335 11.3
Unnamed Stream (E-l) 7,115 0.8
Indian Trail Creek 31,375 3.7
Goose Creek 19,435 2.3
Walnut Creek 35,910 4.2
South Fk., Sugar Creek 124,725 14.5
East Branch, Sugar Creek 79,315 9.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 154,115 17.9
c. Known municipal STP's -
Smithville 5,100 0.6
Brewster 6,870 0.8
d. Septic tanks* - 20,970 2.4
e. Industrial - Unknown ?
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,835 0.2
Total 861,305 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Sugar Creek 758,765
3. Net annual N accumulation - 102,540 kg.
* Estimate based on Beach City (pop. 1,133), 132 lakeshore dwellings,
three parks, and two camps; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdralnage Area:
Tributary - kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Sugar Creek 59 1,263
Elm Run 13 868
North Fk., Sugar Creek 51 876
Middle Fk., Sugar Creek 37 854
Unnamed Stream (E-l) 10 671
Indian Trail Creek 31 896
Goose Creek 26 1,230
Walnut Creek 37 1,044
South Fk., Sugar Creek 153 1,387
East Branch, Sugar Creek 62 1,122
-------
14
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or
becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic
loading would be considered one between "dangerous" and "per-
missible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 27.15 4.51 506.7 60.3
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Beach City Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 2.20
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 1.10
-------
15
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. OWP-1, vol. 5, Washington, DC.
Carpenter, ? (operator), 1975. Personal communication (Smithville
wastewater treatment plant). Smithville.
Ness, Kim (operator), 1975. Personal communication (Sugar Creek
wastewater treatment plant). Sugar Creek,
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Youger, John, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry;
point sources impacting Beach City Reservoir). OH Env. Prot.
Agency, Columbus.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
COOE LAKE NAME
3901 8EACH CITr R£b£RVOIS
3902 BUCKET LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL KESEHVO
3906 DtE* CREEK RESEHVOIR
3907 DELAWARE
390rt D1LLION
3913 GRANT LAKE
391*. HOOVER REbERVUlS
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSOUITO CSEEiv
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
LAKE SAINT
39i39 BERLIN
3^.10 HOLIDAY LAKE
39,11 O'SHAi'GNESS*
ROCKY
SHAi*NEE
LAKt
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.122
0.179
0.127
0.093
0.086
0.163
0.113
0.040
0.120
0.185
0.058
0.036
0. I4d
0.03]
Q.O-+2
0.12S
o.aoa
0.067
O.Ob.
0.04J
MEDIAN
iNOrtG N
1.990
0.380
0.465
2.980
2.340
1.590
0.570
1.640
0.380
1.380
0.150
0.455
0.200
0,205
0.900
0.575
3.070
0,790
2.380
0.260
500-
MEAN SEC
439.000
490.000
482.555
470.125
4«4.111
481. 250
486.333
462.750
tSS.222
H94.000
465.333
456. B33
48*. 167
«62.000
46b.4Jb
465.333
479. J33
"/3.000
474.333
4b6. Ill
MEAN
CHLOKA
10.867
186.567
67.144
9.867
10.856
27.400
40.533
13.017
76.855
104.100
36.267
22.850
79.150
lb.442
15.496
55.3SO
5.522
38.022
39.567
37.711
15-
MIN UO
1 1.600
9.600
15.000
13.900
14.500
14.300
12.200
14.800
14.200
a. 200
11.600
14.700
8.2UO
14.700
13.600
15.000
14.900
15.000
15.000
15.000
MEDIAN
DISS OKTHO
0.015
0.020
0.011
0.036
0.024
0.037
0.019
o.ooa
0.012
0.019
0.006
0.010
0.014
0.005
0.006
0.034
0. 159
0.010
0.009
0.007
-------
OF LAKES WITH HIGHcH- VALUES
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3401 BEACH CITY rfESErtrfOIR
3902 BUCKEYE LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL RESERVOIR
390b DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
3907 DELAWARE rtESE^vOlH
3908 OILL10N RESERVOlw
3912 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESEHVuih
3915 INOIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO C*E£K RESERVOIR
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
3927 LAKE SAINT MAKYS
392rt ATnlOOO RESEHVOlft
3929 bEWLIN «E5E«V01k
3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
3V31 O'SrtAUGNESSt HEStRVOIP
3932 ROCKY FORK LAKE
3933 SMAWNEE LAKE
39.14 TAMPAN LAf.E
or LAKES «ITH
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
37 <
11 (
26 (
53 (
58 (
16 <
47 (
87 <
42 1
5 t
74 .
95 (
21 <
100 (
79 (
32 (
0 (
68 (
63 (
87 <
7)
21
Si
10)
11)
3)
9)
16)
8)
1)
14)
18)
4)
191
15)
6)
0)
13)
12)
16)
MEDIAN
INORG N
21 <
76 <
63 1
5 (
16 (
32 t
58 (
26 (
76 (
37 (
100 (
68 (
95 f
89 (
42 <
53 (
0 (
47 (
11 <
d4 <
4)
141
12)
1)
3)
6)
11)
5)
14)
7)
19)
13)
18)
17)
8)
10)
0)
9)
2)
16)
^.00-
MEAN SEC
11 (
5 <
37 (
63 <
J2 (
42 (
16 1
89 (
21 <
0 <
82 (
100 (
26 (
9b (
74 (
b2 (
47 (
58 <
S3 <
68 (
2)
1)
7)
12)
6)
B)
3)
17)
4)
0)
15)
19)
5)
18)
14)
Ib)
9)
11)
101
13)
MEAN
CrtLORA
84 t
0 t
21 (
95 <
89 (
58 <
32 <
79 <
16 (
5 <
53 (
63 (
11 (
68 (
74 (
26 <
100 (
42 (
37 <
47 (
16)
0)
4)
18)
17)
11)
6)
15»
3)
1)
10)
12)
2)
13)
14)
5)
19)
8)
7)
9)
Ib-
MIlM DO
82 (
89 (
11 (
63 (
47 <
S3 <
74 (
32 (
58 (
97 (
82 (
39 (
97 (
39 (
68 (
11 (
26 (
11 I
11 (
11 <
15)
17)
0)
12)
9)
10)
14)
6)
ID
18)
Ib)
7)
18)
7)
13)
0)
5)
0)
0)
0)
MEDIAN
DlSa UrtTHO f
42 1
26 t
58 <
11 (
21 (
5 <
34 (
79 t
53 (
34 (
92 (
66 (
47 <
100 (
92 I
16 (
0 (
66 (
74 (
84 (
8)
5)
11)
2)
4)
1)
6)
15)
10)
6)
17)
12)
9)
19)
17)
3)
0)
12)
14)
Ib)
INLtE.
NO
277
207
216
290
263
206
261
392
266
178
483
431
297
491
429
220
173
2V2
249
381
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDE*
LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 392d
tNLJE* NO
3 -*ESEKVOi«
PLEASANT MILL LAKE
dE-^LlN RESERvOIP
nOO^ER hiESErfWOIf*
IAPPAM LA-^fc
LAKL SAlNl MAHYS
ROCKY FOWK LAKE
DEES CHEEK RESERVOIR
BEACH cm wtSERVOIR
INDIAN LAKE
DELAWARE RESERVOIR
GRANT LAKE
SHAWNtE LAKE
HOLIDAY LAKE
CHAtfLtS HILL RESEHVOlR
BUCKEYE LAKt
U1LLION RESEWVOm
LORAHIE LAKE
O'ShAUGNESSY RESEHVOIH
483
429
39?
381
290
277
?66
263
261
?49
220
216
207
206
178
173
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
FLO* INFORMATION HJR OttIO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 3001
Cn CUT
TOTAL DRAINAGE AHtA OF LAK£
JUL
4.93
0.76
0.05
0.18
0.48
0.0*
0.1*
0.07
0.14
0.37
0.28
0.59
AUli
2.01
0.45
0.02
0.10
0.27
0.02
0.08 '
0.03
0.08
0.23
0.13
0.42
SEP
1.10
0.34
0.02
0.07
0.20
0.02
U.Ob
0.02
0.06
0.16
0.13
0.31
OCT
1.56
0.37
0.02
0.08
0.22
0.02
O.Ob
0.03
0.06
0.17
0.13
0.34
NOV
2.58
0.79
0.04
0.18
0.4U
0.04
0.14
0.06
0.14
0.40
0.28
0.74
DEC
5.80
1.S9
0.10
0.40
0.99
0.09
0.31
0.14
0.28
0.82
0.65
1.27
MEAN
7.20
1.77
0.11
0.43
1.10
0.11
0.35
0.16
0.34
0.89
0.71
1.64
SOHMARY
ilNAGE
AfcfEA OF
LAKE =
IB-04A1NAGE AREAS =
777.0
777.0
TOTAL FLO*
TOTAL FLOW
IN =
OOT =
91.73
86.90
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOwS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
3901A1
MtAN FLOiK UAY
39U1A2
S
6
7
a
9
10
11
i?
i
2
3
it
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
1?
1
2
3
<*
73
73
7J
7J
73
n
73
?j
74
7~>
7*
74
73
7J
73
7J
73
7J
73
73
74
7<*
74
74
13.42
7.31
3.43
2.U4
1.27
3.11
9.29
11.2*
19."O
8.LO
17.95
21).(J
10
Ib
19
16
21
11
d
6
17
3
21
I-LO* DAY
8.44
6.31
2.10
2.27
0.93
1.47
1.98
22. 85
6.09
b.4/
FLO* OAY
FLOW
10
34.26
5.69
1.4*
1.25
u.td
u.iri
0.20
U.34
1.56
1.19
J.45
1.36
31
47.57
14.33 31
16.99
-------
LAKE COOE 3901
TRIdUFAKY FLOW INFORMATION FOK OHIO
HEACH Clfr KtSEKVOIK
I/27/7S
MEAN MONTHLY FLO*S AND UAILY FLOWS(CMSI
TftiaUTAHY MONTH YEAH MEAN FLO* DAY
390 IB)
3901C1
3901D1
390 IE 1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
it
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
7J
73
73
7J
73
73
74
74
74
74
73-
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
0.20
0.11
0.06
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.14
0.15
0.37
0.11
0.34
0.37
0.74
0.45
0.23
0.13
0.08
0.20
0.59
0.59
1.47
0.42
1.30
1.39
1.90
1.19
0.59
0.34
0.24
0.54
1.56
1.53
3. 82
1.13
3.17
3.31
0.20
o.oa
0.04
O.U2
O.C1
0.03
0.14
0.11
0.16
0.12
0.26
C.1B
6
10
IS
19
16
21
11
2
6
17
3
21
6
10
15
19
16
21
11
2
6
17
3
21
b
10
IS
19
16
21
11
2
6
17
3
21
6
10
15
19
16
21
11
2
b
17
3
21
10
FLO* DAY
0.09
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.15
0.10
U.07
0.22
0.08
0.37
0.31
0.12
0.12
0.07
0.10
0.13
0.62
0.40
0.28
o.as
0.34
0.91
0.79
0.31
0.31
0.19
0.31
0.34
1.59
0.99
0.74
2. Id
0.85
0.12
O.OH
0.02
U.03
0.02
«.03
0.01
0.11
0.09
0.07
0.17
0.06
FLOW DAY
FLOW.
0.91 31
1.08
10
3.54 31
4.16
10
9.03 31
10.68
10
0.4S 31
1.10
-------
TRlbUTAKY FLO* INFORMATION FUhi OHIO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE
CIIY
MEAN MONTHLY FLUitb ANL) UA1LY
TRIBUTARY WONTrt YLAK
3901F1
3901M1
3901J1
s
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
7t
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
U
73
73
73
74
74
It
74
MEAN FLOW DAY
0.62
0.27
0.13
0.06
0.04
0.11
0.51
0.37
0.54
0.40
0.82
O.S7
0.28
0.12
O.Ofa
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.23
0.16
0.24
0.17
0.37
0.27
0.62
0.26
0.13
0.36
0.04
0.11
0.48
0.34
O.bl
0.37
0.7Sf
0.54
1.59
0.71
0.34
o.ia
0.11
0.31
1.44
0.49
1.42
0.99
2.04
I.t2
6
10
15
19
16
21
11
2
6
17
3
21
6
10
15
19
16
21
11
2
b
17
3
21
6
10
15
19
16
•f\
11
2
6
17
3
21
b
10
IS
19
16
21
11
2
6
17
3
21
KLOrt DAY
0.40
0.27
0.07
o!o3
0.05
0.40
0.2B
0.24
0.57
0.20
0.1H
0.12
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.17
0.13
0.11
0.25
0.09
0.40
0.27
O.U7
0.09
0.02
0.03
u.05
0.34
0.2d
0.23
0.54
0.19
1.02
0.71
O.ld
0.24
0.07
0.12
0.12
1.02
u.76
0,59
1.44
O.til
FLOW UAY
FLOW
1.50 31
3.60
10
0.68 31
1.61
10
1.47
31
3.54
10
3i
-------
LAKE CODE 3901
TRIdUTAnY FLO* INFORMATION Fort OdlU
BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
1/27/75
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWb(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
3901K1
3901ZZ
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
1.27
0.57
0.26
0.14
0.09
0.24
1.02
0.76
1.16
0.79
1.61
1.10
2.97
1.47
0.76
0.40
0.25
0.65
2.49 '
1.98
3.71
1.76
4.33
3.68
6
10
15
19
16
21
11
2
6
17
3
21
2
FLOW DAY
0.79
0.57
0.1<*
0.19
0.13
0.21
0.10
0.79
0.59
0.48
1.13 10
0.40
0.0
FLOW DAY
FLO*
3.03
31
7.28
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE. 75/01/27
390101
40 38 08.0 081 33 36.0
BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
39157 OHIO
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/04/20
73/07/30
73/10/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 00 0000
15 00 0006
16 50 0000
13 15 0000
13 15 0004
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
IS. 8
15.4
24.2
17.7
17.5
00300 00077 00094
DO TMANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
7.5
3.4
5.0
12
8
13
470
470
439
748
790
HEP ALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.20
8.20
7.40
7.30
7.00
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
36
40
102
78
72
2111202
0010
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.160
0.120
0.380
0.360
0.400
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.400
U3001'
1.600
1.300
00630
N02VN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
2.800
2.700
1.610
0.980
-0.940
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.009
0.017
0.033
0.015
0.012
0066S 32217
DATE TIME DtPTH PHOS-TOT CHLKPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY F££T M(i/L H UG/L
73/04/20 IS 00 0000 0.093 4.3
1& 00 0006 0.085
73/07/30 16 50 0000 U.2H1 IV.4
7J/lu/Ob 13 15 0000 0.1*2 rt.9
13 15 0004 0.122
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
RETRIEVAL UATt 75/02/J3
390U1
•+0 3h i4.o ual 32 so.o
SUGAH
39059
0/stACn
ST niT 21 drJDG 2 MJ St OF Ht«CH CITr
OATt
f rtUM
lu
73/05/06
73/06/10
73/0 7/ In
tj/ ytf/19
73/09/16
73/ 10/21
73/11/U
73/12/02
7^/01/06
7**/02/ 1 7
74/u3/0 J
7<+/0 J/ 10
7** /u 3/31
74/04/2 1
Odb3U 00625
U*lt OLPTH NU^&N03 TOT nJF.L
uF' >j- TOTAL N
UAY FEET
10
09
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3901A2
40 44 12.0 081 39 12.0
SUGAR CREEK
3* 7.5 WILMOT
I/BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
2NDHY RO BHDG 1 MI HE OF WEST LEBANON
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/06
74/02/17
74/03/03
74/03/10
74/03/31
7^/04/21
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 35
09 05
08 55
09 05
09 00
09 30
09 30
08 20
09 20
09 15
09 55
10 00
ua 45
08 50
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
3.200
3.500-
0.910
1.140
0.590
2.200
2.400
5.400
4.700
4.200
5.000
2.600
3.700
2.940
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.320
1.050
0.960
1.150
1.100
1.550
0.300
0.100K
0.800
0.700
0.800
2*600
1.600
0.900
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.075
0.096
0.028
0.118
0.072
0.336
0.080
0.076
0.132
0.155
0.055
0.120
0.145
0.045
00671
PHOS-DIS
OUT HO
MG/L P
0.052
0.075
0.046
0.044
0.042
0.072
0.056
0.052
0.080
0.115
0.055
0.105
0.095
0.035
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.105
0.220
0.170
0.180
0.260
0.375
0.130
0.115
0.140
0.195
0.200
0.660
0.260
0.055
\
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL OATE 75/02/10
40 43 16.0 081 35 20.0
tLM rtUN
39 7.5 NAVAKKE
T/atACH CITY HEStKVOIR
ridr1 bKOG E SIDE OK NORTH
11EHALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FKUM
TU
73/i)b/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/Ori/ 19
/3/U9/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/06
74/02/17
74/03/03
7*4/0 j/ 10
74/UJ/31
74/0^/21
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH NO?t,N03 TUT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
10
09
09
09
09
09
09
08
09
09
10
10
08
09
r FEET
00
20
10
25
25
50
35
35
50
25
05
15
55
05
MG/L
2
a
i
0
0
0
1
J
2
3
2
2
2
2
.200
.300
.680
.960
.940
.620
.060
.080
.760
.200
.200
.100
.200
.20u
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
440
640
910
540
880
200
950
800
100K
400
600
300
aoo
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OKTHO
MG/L
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.036
.073
.048
.078
.098
.088
,108
.072
.J40
.040
.015
.035
.035
.030
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.007
.012
.019
.015
.009
.018
.020
.012
.008
.005
.010
.040
.020
.005
MG/L P
0.020
0.035
0.045
0.040
0.050
0.025
0.055
0.035
0.025
0.060
0.300
0.085
0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3901C1
40 43 00.0 081 39 50.0
NORTH FOKK,
39 7.5 WILMOT
T/8EACH CITY REStHVOIH
2NDRY HD BRDG .5 MI S OF *EST LEBANON
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FHOM
TO
73/05/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/03/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/06
74/02/17
74/03/03
74/03/10
74/03/31
74/04/21
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
UB
08
06
08
09
09
08
09
09
09
06
08
10
55
45
55
55
25
10
10
00
05
50
30
45
MG/L
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
3.
2.
3.
3.
3.
1.
100
200
580
420
460
620
260
800
200
940
600
200
000
680
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
750
560
570
560
440
800
650
200
600
300
700
700
0.800
0.
100K
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OWTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
060
058
115
048
079
046
048
064
072
02b
040
040
045
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
p
036
054
052
056
063
097
176
0.060
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
088
095
03S
060
040
025
MG/L P
0.055
0.095
0.155
0.100
0.152
0.315
0.340
0.115
0.140
0.150
0.115
0.395
0.150
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
39U101
<*0 40 44.0 081 47 20,0
MIUDLE FK SUGAR CREEK
39 7.5 NAVARRt
T/BEACH CITY *ESEKV01«
STONEFORD ST 6HOG 1.5 Mi NE OF
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FtET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
Tu
73/05/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/19
73/09/lb
73/10/21
7J/11/11
73/12/02
74/yi/Jb
7<+/U2/l7
7*t/o3/03
7^/03/10
7^/03/31
74/04/21
0063U 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF rj- TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
09
09
09
09
10
09
08
09
09
10
10
09
09
20
30
20
40
45
05
45
50
50
45
25
30
05
15
MG/L
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
2.
2.
3.
2.
2.
1.
840
400
820
600
340
730
180
600
940
700
080
700
900
440
MG/L
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
.380
.690
.500
.840
.320
.450
.650
.300
.400
.300
.600
.700
.012
.100
00610 00671 00665
NHJ-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OkFHO
Mb/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
061
138
115
072
115
040
084
060
06b
03S
030
065
065
065
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
(J.
0.
0.
p
010
019
028
026
027
019
020
012
012
010
030
020
020
010
MG/L P
0.030
0.100
0.135
0.140
0.135
0.220
0.030
0.065
0.025
0.025
0.135
0.330
0.285
0.040
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL UATt 75/02/10
3901E1
40 3d 08.0 081 35 13.0
UNNAMED STREAM
3$ 7.5 MAVAKKE
T/BEACH ClTr REStKVOIK
2NOKY RD BRDb 1 MI S OF bEACH CITY
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FRUM
TU
73/OS/Ofa
73/06/10
73/0 It 15
73/Od/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
7^/01/06
7^/02/17
7**/UJ/03
74/03/10
74/03/31
7
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3901F1
40 35 55.0 081 39 40.0
INDIAN TRAIL CHEEK
39 7.5 SUGAR GREEK
T/BEACH CITY RESERVOIK
2MOKV RD BRDG 3 MI SE OF WJNESBURG
11EPALLS 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
7V05/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
7J/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/Ob
7W02/17
74/03/03
74/03/10
74/03/31
74/04/21
TIME I
OF
DAY 1
11 30
10 20
10 05
10 30
10 50
11 20
10 05
11 00
10 55
11 35
11 55
10 20
10 15
DEPTH
FEET
0630
:&N03
OTAL
G/L
1.700
0.900
0.600
0.550
0.740
1.140
1.260
3.300
2.605
2.200
2.500
2.300
2.76U
1.180
00625
ior KJEL
N
MG/L
1.320
1.050
1.680
0.710
1.180
2.100
0.925
0.400
0.500
0.500
0.800
1.100
0.800
0.600
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.077
0.079
0*064
0.065
0.196
0.210
0.232
o.ioa
0.168
0.160
0.155
0.230
0.145
0*0**2
00671
PHOS-DIS
OP.THO
MG/L P
0.007
0.012
0.024
0.058
0.063
0.050
0.028
0.008
0.008
0.005
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.015
0.050
0.090
0.135
0.180
0.360
0.097
0.0b5
0.045
0.040
0.085
0.090
0.130
0.025
-------
STOrttT HETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/10
3901G1
40 32 10.0 OBI 41 45.0
bOOSt CREEK
39 7.5 SUGAR CREEK
T/BEACh CITY HEStKVOIK
2NOKY MD OHOG 1.3 MI ENE OF WALNUT CHK
HEPALeS 2111204
<* 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FHOM
TO
73/wS/Ob
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/06
7<*/02/l 7
74/03/03
74/03/lU
74/03/31
74/U4/21
TIME D£PT>
OF
DAY FEET
12
11
11
12
12
12
11
12
12
12
13
12
11
55
45
30
30
10
55
10
10
25
05
00
00
20
00630 00625
1 N02&N03 TOT KJEL
N-TOTAL N
MG/L
2.
t.
0.
0.
0.
a.
0.
4.
4.
3.
3.
3.
4.
1.
500
7toO
780
670
191)
450
900
620
000
520
900
700
500
900
MG/L
0.980
0.770
1.600
0.960
7.200
2.200
1.500
0.200
0.500
0.400
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OHTHO
MG/L
0.
0*
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
054
084
168
154
000
640
320
124
132
065
0/0
050
065
030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
. 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
027
022
027
044
345
023
024
024
024
015
032
0.030
0.
0.
035
030
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.070
.060
• 085
.130
.900
.095
.075
.060
.060
.095
.090
0.130
0
.040
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATL 75/02/10
3901H1
40 yd is.o oai 42 oo.o
*ALNUT CHEEK
39 7.5 SObAK CREEK
T/dEACH CITY HlESEKVOiN
2*UHY RU bRDG 1 MI EbE OF WALNUT CKEEK
UEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
fO
73/u5/06
73/06/10
7J/07/15
73/ud/19
73/09/lb
7J/10/21
7J/11/11
7 3/ i 2/ 0 Z
7t/01/0b
7<4/U2/l?
7i*/U3/03
7^*/i>3/10
74/03/31
7^/0^/21
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02kNOj TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
OAY FEET
12
11
11
ia
12
12
11
12
12
12
12
11
11
<»0
40
?5
20
05
45
00
05
20
00
50
45
30
MG/L
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
.200
.820
. 7<+U
.900
.160
.820
.340
.600
.100
.90!}
.730
.640
.000
.100
MG/L
1.
1.
3.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
000
noo
100
900
400
700
20U
600
600
500
700
BOO
700
600
00610 00671 0066S
NH3-N PhOS-OIS PhOb-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
M&/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
9.
j.
056
093
138
IbO
350
400
276
udO
096
090
070
040
055
040
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.022
.034
.050
.042
.039
.036
.092
.028
.028
.025
.030
.020
.015
.020
MG/L P
0.050
0,1 HO
0.145
0.140
0.120
0.250
0 . 1 0 'J
0.10U
O.u/0
0.120
0.155
U.115
0.030
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 7S/02/U3
3901J1
40 31 00.0 081 37 30.0
S FK SUGAR CREEK
39 7.5 STRASBURG
T/BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
2NDRY RD BROG .5 Ml NE OF SUGAR CREEK
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/06/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/06
74/02/17
74/03/03
74/03/10
74/03/31
74/04/21
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 00
10 55
10 30
11 00
11 20
11 45
10 30
11 30
11 15
11 35
11 55
10 40
10 50
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
3.000
3.200
0.950
1.540
0.640
0.890
1.260
4.620
3.700
3.520
3.780
3.900
4.200
2.760
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.950
2.200
3.100
1.280
2.100
1.950
1.600
0.400
0.800
0.900
1.000
1.300
1.000
0.600
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.250
0.273
0.550
0.440
1.470
0.855
0.690
0.156
0.240
0.270
0.135
0.125
0.100
0.200
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.014
0.890
1.100
0.140
0.023
0.024
0.020
0.132
0.075
0.010
0.080
0.010
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.120
0.220
1.150
1.570
0.520
0*320
0.440
0.230
0.550
O.D90
0.250
0.510
0.280
0.085
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3901K1
40 30 30.0 CBl 36 45.0
E BRANCH
39 7.5 STKA5BUKG
T/etACH CITY HEStrtVOIrt
ST NT 39 OKDG 1 Ml E OF SUGA* CREEK
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATh
FWUM
TO
73/05/06
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/19
73/09/16
73/10/21
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/06
74/02/17
74/C3/03
74/03/10
74/03/31
74/04/21
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH ftiU2t.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
D*O
12
11
10
11
11
11
10
11
11
11
12
10
10
f FEET
20
00
35
10
25
55
40
45
20
40
05
45
40
MG/L
2
2
0
1
0
0
1
4
3
2
3
3
4
1
.300
.500
.770
,22J
.490
.510
.260
.300
.100
.700
.700
.600
.100
.760
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
wSO
dOO
760
1JO
680
bOO
050
100K
600
600
900
500
HOO
700
00610
NH3-N F
TOTAL
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
.110
.130
.376
.215
.470
.400
.250
.088
.124
.105
.075
.075
.085
.OHJ
00671 00665
>ttOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
ORTHO
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.005*
.005K
.006
.019
.005*
.007
.008
.005K
.OObK
.005K
.005
.010
.005K
.005K
MG/L P
0.063
0.130
0.155
0.220
0.420
0.37b
0.260
0.140
0.100
0.100
0.190
0.315
0.230
0.055
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |