U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
&GPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
DILLON RESERVOIR
IUSKINGUM COUNTY
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WDRKING PAPER No, 400
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND THE
1
OHIO NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Ohio Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary • 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
ii
FOREWORD,
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)j, clean lakes [§314{a,b}],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency for professional involvement, to the Ohio National Guard
for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Ohio wastewater treatment plant operators who provided
effluent samples and flow data.
Ned Williams, Director, and Tom Birch, Ken Carr, Larry
Dietrick, Ron Havlice, Larry Korecko, Rod Mehlhop, Terry Wheeler,
and John Youger, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most
useful 1n the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Dana L. Stewart, then the Adjutant General
of Ohio, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel Robert C. Timmons,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Ohio National Guards-
men, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to
the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OHIO
LAKE NAME
Atwood
Beach City
Berlin
Buckeye
Charles Mill
Deer Creek
Delaware
Dillon
Grand Lake of St. Marys
Grant
Holiday
Hoover
Indian
Loramie
Mosquito Creek
O'Shaughnessy
Pymatuning
Pleasant Hill
Rocky Fork
Shawnee
Tappan
COUNTY
Carrol 1, Tuscarawas
Stark, Tuscarawas
Manoning, Portage, Stark
Fairfield, Licking, Perry
Ashland, Richland
Fayette, Pickaway
Delaware
Muskingum
Auglaize, Mercer
Brown
Huron
Delaware, Franklin
Logan
Auglaize, Shelby
Trumbull
Delaware
Ashtabula, OH; Crawford, PA
Ashland, Richland
Highland
Greene
Harrison
-------
DILLON RESERVOIR
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Plant
Land Subject To Inundation
. 7
DILLON
RESERVOIR
-------
DILLON RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 3908
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Dillon Reservoir is eutrophic.
It ranked eighteenth in overall trophic quality when the 20
Ohio lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of
six parameters*. Sixteen of the lakes had less median total
phosphorus, 18 had less median dissolved phosphours, 13 had
less median inorganic nitrogen, eight had less mean chlorophyll
a., and 11 had greater mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked
depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at sampling
station 1 in July and October.
Survey limnologists noted sumberged vegetation at station 1
in October and an algal bloom along the shoreline at station 3
in April.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Dillon Reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the time the sample was collected (04/26/73),
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The phosphorus contribution of known
point sources amounted to about 41% of the total input to Dillon
Reservoir during the sampling year. Newark contributed 21.5%;
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
Heath, 4.435; Buckeye Lake SD, 4.3%; Johnstown, 2.7%; Granville,
2.5%; Utica, 1.3%; Patalaska, 1.1%; Hebron, 1.1%; and seven other
domestic sources collectively contributed 1.8%.
The present phosphorus loading of 32.91 g/m2/yr is over 15
times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 15). However, Vollenweider's
model may not be applicable to water bodies with short hydraulic
retention times, and the mean hydraulic retention time of Dillon
Reservoir is a short nine days. Nonetheless, the existing trophic
condition of the reservoir is evidence of excessive nutrient loads.
While even a 100% reduction in the phosphorus loads from the
known point sources would still leave a loading of 19.51 g/m2/yr,
the reservoir is phosphorus limited, and all phosphorus inputs
should be minimized to the greatest practicable extent to slow the
eutrophication of Dillon Reservoir.
2. Non-point sources—About 59% of the total phosphorus input
to Dillon Reservoir during the sampling year is attributed to non-
point sources. After accounting for the known point sources, the
Licking River contributed 56.4% of the total. The remaining sampled
tributaries collectively contributed 1.5% of the total phosphorus
load. The contribution of ungaged tributaries was estimated to
have been 1.3% of the total.
The phosphorus export rate of the Licking River was substantially
higher than the rates of the other tributaries sampled (see page 14).
It is likely that municipal point sources beyond the 40-kilometer
-------
3
limit of the Survey* or industrial point sources (see page 11)
contributed significantly to the phosphorus load in the river.
* See Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods, 1973-1976".
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry (at normal pool level) :
1. Surface area: 5.36 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 3.0 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >7.6 meters.
4. Volume: 16.080 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 9 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (mVsec)*
Licking River 1,390.8 15.2
Big Run 14.6 0.2
Stump Run 8.9 0.1
Rocky Fork 193.7 2.0
Bowling Green Run 12.8 0.1
Claylick Creek 49.7 0.5
Brushy Fork 40.9 0.4
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 205.0 2.2
Totals 1,916.4 20.7
2. Outlet -
Licking River 1,921.8** 20.7
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 106.2 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 100.1 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Youger, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175.
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Dillon Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
one or more depths at two stations during the summer and from three
stations during the spring and fall (see map, page v). During each
visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface) sample
was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification and
enumeration; and during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-
integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time,
a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for
f
chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 7.6 meters at
station 1, 3.0 meters at station 2, and 2.1 meters at station 3.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP
DJSS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/D
TOT P (MG/D
ORTHO P (MG/L>
N02*N03 (MG/LI
AMMONIA (MG/LI
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/26/73)
3 SITES
RANGE
13.1 - 16.0
4.2 - 10.9
380. - 430.
7.9 - 8.4
121. - 143.
0.122 - 0.204
0.004 - 0.061
1.200 - 1.600
0.100 - 0.390
0.900 - 1.500
1.300 - 1.890
2.200 - 2.700
10.8 - 25.9
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR DILLON RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 3908
2ND SAMPLING ( 7/30/73)
2 SITES
3RD SAMPLING <10/ 8/73)
3 SITES
0.* -
0.5
MEAN
14.6
8.5
404.
8.1
133.
0.150
0.032
1.440
0.226
1.090
1.666
2.530
16.5
0.4
MEDIAN
14.3
9.0
396.
8.0
132.
0.134
0.032
1.500
0.240
1.050
1.740
2.600
12.7
0.4
RANGE
23.9
0.7
314.
7.4
99.
0.106
0.031
1.080
0.090
1.400
1.170
2.680
20.0
0.3
- 25.4
8.0
- 420.
8.3
- 134.
- 0.293
- 0.076
- 1.350
- 0.450
- 1.800
- 1.710
- 3.000
- 54.6
0.6
MEAN
24.8
4.6
3S3.
7.8
111.
0.198
0.049
1.214
0.246
1.560
1.460
2.774
37.3
O.S
MEDIAN
24.8
4.6
340.
7.8
103.
0.195
0.050
1.200
0.260
l.SOO
1.460
2.750
37.3
0.5
RANGE
19.8
1.0
440.
7.2
135.
0.097
0.021
0.890
0.300
2.200
1.420
3.130
14.7
0.3
- 21.4
8.6
- 510.
8.5
- 146.
- 0.300
- 0.093
- 1.590
- 0.940
- 3.200
- 2.360
- 4.490
- 60.3
-. 0.7
MEAN
20.7
4.2
486.
7.7
142.
0.192
0.041
1.152
0.653
2.767
l.BOS
3.918
31.7
0.5
MEDIAN
21.0
3.4
S03.
7.6
143.
0.193
0.034
1.105
0.700
2.900
1.690
4.155
20.2
0.6
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampli ng
Date
04/26/73
07/30/73
10/08/73
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
04/26/73
07/30/73
10/08/73
Dominant
Genera^
1. Qscinatorjj* SJD.
2. Nitzschia sp_.
3. Scenedesmus sp.
4. Navicula sj>.
5. Centric diatoms
Other genera
Total
1. Flagellates
2. Merismopedia .sp_.
3. Stephanodiscus s£.
4. Nitzschia sjj.
5. Chroococcus sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Flagellates
2. Oscillatoria sp.
3. Stephanodiscus sp.
4. Scenedesmus sp.
5. Raphidiopsis sp.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
01
02
03
01
02
03
01
02
03
Algal Units
per ml
8,710
2,393
100
100
100
831
12,234
2,755
2,280
2,185
1,995
1,900
9.022
20,137
11,358
1,045
950
430
294
1,444
151521
Chlorophyll a
(uq/1)
25.9
12.7
10.8
20.0
54.6
14.7
60.3
20.2
-------
8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Filtered and nutrient spiked -
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
0.008
0.058
0.058
0.008
0.368
0.368
1.368
1.368
11.7
20.2
19.9
10.1
Ortho P
Cone, (mq/1)
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
0.040
0.090
0.090
0.040
1.470
1.470
2.470
2.470
13.9
29.0
32.6
13.0
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
3. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum cajpri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Dillon Reservoir was high at the time the sample was col-
lected (04/26/73). The addition of phosphorus alone produced
a significant increase in yield in both assays which indicates
limitation by phosphorus. Note that in neither assay did the
addition of nitrogen alone result in a yield significantly
different than that of the control.
The reservoir data also indicate phosphorus limitation.
At all sampling stations and times, the mean inorganic nitrogen/
orthophosphorus ratios were 23/1 or greater.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Ohio National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Ohio District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient exports, in kg/km2/year, at stations B-l, C-l, E-l, and F^-l
and multiplying the means by the II area in km2.
The operators of the Newark and Pataskala wastewater treatment
plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
The operators of the Granville, Utica, Heath, Hebron, Dillon State Park
#1 and #2, and the Lake and Hills Sewer District wastewater treatment
plants did not participate in the sampling program, and nutrient loads
were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
Nutrient loads from the wastewater treatment plants at Buckeye Lake
SD#1, Forest Hills Subdivision #2, Jardin Manor Subdivision, Johnstown,
Licking County Home, and the Miller Company were calculated using daily
loads provided by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Youger, 1975);
however, nitrogen loads shown for these sources are total Kjeldahl nitrogen
only.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Pop.
Name Served
Newark"1" . 43,000
Pataskala7 2,000
GranviHe* 3,963
Utica* 1,977
Heath* 6,768
Hebron* 1,699
Buckeye Lake 5,470
SD #1**
Prescott Estates** 400
Forest Hills 600
Subd. #2**
Jardin Manor 1,000
Subd.**
Johnstown** 3,490
Licking Cty. Home** 50
Mean Flow
Treatment (m
act. sludge 33
aer. lagoon 1
trickling 1
filter
act. sludge
act. sludge 2
ext. aer.
trickling 2
filter
ext. aer.
act. sludge
ext. aer. +
sand filter
trickling 1
filter
ext. aer.
Vd)
,284. lft
,016.2
,500.0
748.3
,561.7
643.1
,070.4
151.4
227.1
(design)
378.5
(design)
,321.0
189.0
Receiving
Water
Licking River
South Fork
Licking River
Raccoon Creek
North Fork
Licking River
Ramp Creek
South Fork
Licking River
Buckeye L. outlet
stream
North Fork
Licking River
Licking River
South Fork
Licking River
Raccoon River
North Fork
Dillon State Park
#1**
#2**
Lake & Hills 280
SD #9**
ext. aer.
ext. aer.
ext. aer. +
sand filter
(design) Licking River
? Dillon Reservoir
? Big Run
106.0 Big Run
t Treatment plant questionnaires.
tt More than 25% of waste load is from industry.
* Anonymous, 1971 (populations are 1970 census; flows estimated at 0.3785
m3/capita/day).
** Youger, 1975; population estimated from flow (0.3785 m3/capita/day).
-------
11
2. Known Industrial* -
Mean Flow Receiving
Name Product Treatment (m3/d) Water
Miller Co. lighting ? 49.2 N. Fork
equip. Licking River
Fifteen additional industries (combined flow = 19,099.1 m3/d)
impact the North and South Forks of the Licking River. These
include the Ashland Oil Company, Dayton Precision Company, Dow
Chemical Company, Kaiser Alumunim (2 plants), Koppers Company,
National Gypsum Company, Newark Processing, Owens-Corning Fiber-
glass (2 plants), Pacific Resin and Chemical, Resinoid Engineer's
Corporation, Rockwell Standard, and Scovilie-General Hose and
Coupling. These sources are not included in the loadings on the
following pages because no data are available on the amounts of
nutrients they contribute, if any. However, any nutrient loads
from these sources are included in the loads measured in the
Licking River at station A-2.
* Youger, 1975.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Licking River 99,445 56.4
Big Run 140 0.1
Stump Run 65 <0.1
Rocky Fork 1,330 0.8
Bowling Green Run 195 0.1
Claylick Creek 680 0.4
Brushy Fork 250 0.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 2,345 1.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Newark 37,930 21.5
Pataskala 1,940 1.1
Granville 4,495 2.5
Utica 2,240 1.3
Heath 7,675 4.4
Hebron 1,925 1.1
Buckeye Lake, SD #1 7,555 4.3
Prescott Estates 550 0.3
Forest Hills Subd. #2 840 0.5
Jardin Manor Subd. 1,385 0.8
Johnstown 4,820 2.7
Licking Cty. Home 75 <0.1
Dillon St. Park #1* 10 <0.1
Dillon St. Park #2* 10 <0.1
Lake & Hills SD #9 320 0.2
d. Septic tanks** - 30 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Miller Co. 75 <0.1
f. Direct precipitation*** - 95_ <0.1
Total 176,420 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Licking River 86,675
3. Net annual P accumulation - 89,745 kg.
* Estimated; see Working Paper No. 175.
** Estimate based on 103 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
*** See Working paper No. 175.
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Source
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Licking River 1,424,020 56.7
Big Run 6,925 0.3
Stump Run 3,785 0.2
Rocky Fork 96,545 3.8
Bowling Green Run 6,835 0.3
Claylick Creek 28,640 1.1
Brushy Fork 11,155 0.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 103,015 4.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Newark 726,925 28.9
Pataskala 2,805 0.1
Granville 13,480 0.5
Utica 6,725 0.3
Heath 23,020 0.9
Hebron 5,780+ 0.2
Buckeye Lake SD #1 18,870]. 0.8
Prescott Estates 11Ol <0.1
Forest Hills Subd. #2 2,080l 0.1
Jardin Manor Subd. 290]. <0.1
Johnstown 12,0451 0.5
Licking Cty. Home 12,045T 0.5
Dillon St. Park #1* 30 <0.1
Dillon St. Park #2* 30 <0.1
Lake & Hills SD #9 950 <0.1
d. Septic tanks** - 1,100 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Miller Co.
f. Direct precipitation*** - 5,785 0.2
Total 2,512,990 100.0
t Based on total Kjeldahl nitrogen.
* Estimated; see Working Paper No. 175.
** Estimate based on 103 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
kg N/
Source y_r
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Licking River 1,963,950
3. Net annual N accumulation - 549,040 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Licking River 72 1,024
Big Run 10 474
Stump Run 7 425
Rocky Fork 7 498
Bowling Green Run 15 534
Claylick Creek 14 576
Brushy Fork 6 273
-------
15
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is one
at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain
eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which would result
in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
\
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nvtrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
\
grams/mVyr 32.91 16.74 468.8 102.4
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Dillon Reservoir:
"Dangerous" {eutrophic loading) 2.10
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 1.05
-------
16
LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. OWP-1, vol. 5, Washington, DC.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Natl.
Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland
Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Youger, John, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphotnetry; point
sources and loads). OH Env. Prot. Agency, Columbus.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE OAT* TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
CODE LAKE NAME
3901 BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
3902 BUCKEYE LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL RESERVOIR
3906 DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
3907 DELAWARE RESERVOIR
3908 DILHON RESERVOI*
3912 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESERVOIR
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO CREEK RESERVOIR
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
3937 LAKE SAINT
3-J28 ATWOOD
3929 BERLIN RESERVOIK
3930 HOLlDAr LAKE
393L O'SMAUGNESSr r
-------
PERCENT or LUXES WITH HIGHER VALUES
( 5)
( 14)
( 7)
( 19)
( 13)
( 18)
( 17)
( 8)
( 10)
< 0)
< 9)
< 2)
( 16)
500-
MEAN SEC
11 (
5 (
37 (
63 (
J2 <
42 (
16 (
89 (
21 (
0 (
82 (
100 <
26 (
95 <
74 (
62 (
47 (
58 (
53 (
68 (
2)
1)
7)
12)
6)
ttl
3)
17)
4)
0)
15)
19)
5)
18)
14)
IS)
9)
11)
101
13)
MEAN
CrlLOHA
84 (
0 (
21 (
95 <
89 <
58 (
32 4
79 <
16 <
S (
S3 (
63 (
11 (
68 (
74 (
26 <
100 (
42 <
37 (
47 1
16)
0)
4)
18)
17)
11)
6)
1S>
3)
1)
101
12)
2)
13)
14)
&)
19)
8)
7)
9)
MIN UO
82 <
89 (
11 (
63 (
47 (
53 (
74 (
32 (
58 (
97 (
82 (
39 (
97 I
39 (
68 I
11 I
26 (
11 (
11 (
11 I
15)
17J
0)
12)
9)
10)
14)
6)
11)
18)
Ib)
7)
18)
7)
13)
0)
5)
0)
°t
0)
MEOIAN
OISS OrtTHU P
42 I
26 t
58 (
11 <
21 (
5 (
34 <
79 <
53 (
34 (
92 (
66 (
47 (
100 (
92 (
16 (
0 (
66 (
74 (
84 (
8)
5)
11)
2)
4)
1)
6)
15)
10)
6)
17)
12)
9)
19)
17)
3)
0)
12)
14)
lt>)
INUEX
NO
277
207
216
290
263
206
261
392
266
178
48J
431
297
491
429
220
in
292
249
381
-------
LAKES WANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 392d
2 3921
3 392<»
4 3929
5 391*
6 393*,
7 3927
8 3933
9 390b
10 3901
11 3915
12 3907
13 3^12
i* 3933
15 3930
16 3905
17 3902
18 3908
19 3917
20 3931
INDEX NO
ATdUUO REbE^VOI* **91
MOSUU1TO CfttEK RESERVOIR ^83
PLEASANT HILL LAKE *»31
dErfLlN RESEHvOIrt 4?9
HOOVER KESE^VOIR 392
TAPPAN LAKE 381
LAKE SAINT MAHYS 297
ROCKY FOKK LAKE 292
DEER CREEK HESERVOIR 290
BEACM CITr WESERVOIR 377
INDIAN LAKE 266
DELAWARE RESERVOIR 263
GRANT LAKE 261
SHA-NEE LAKE ?*9
HOLIDAY LAKE 230
CHARLtS MILL RESERVOIR 216
BUCKEYE LAKC 207
DILLION RESERVOIR 206
LORAH1E LAKE 178
0<5HAUGNESSr RESEHVOlH 173
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 ~ feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FUH OrllO
1/27X75
LAKt COUt 39C8
LllLLO'M KEiERVOtH
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE
-------
TrtlbUTAMf FLOW INFORMATION FOh OrilU
1/27/75
LttKt CODE 390B
L'lLLUN
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS ANJ DAILY FLOKS(CMS)
JSlObt-i
MONTH
TtArt
5
6
7
8
<*
10 .
11
12
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
3
3
4
5
6
7
H
9
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
ij
ID
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
/3
73
74
7t
74
7/.
» *T
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
7t
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
MtAN FLOW (JAY
0.17
O.Z4
0.10
O.U6
0.0?
0.03
0.£7
0.25
0.37
0.2'j
0.34
O.IJ7
0.10
0.15
O.Ob
O.uJ
0.01
O.U2
0.16
0.15
0.2?
J.14
o.ai
0.34
2.i5
3.43
1.3*
O.tiS
0.31
0.57
A.Z'j
3.34
5.1U
2.yu
4. 16
h.ftS
0.15
0.21
J.U8
O.Ob
O.u2
il.Ojl
U.25
u.22
0.34
(j.ij
J.31
0.31
5
3
8
12
16
14
11
9
13
9
9
20
5
3
d
12
16
14
11
*
13
9
-------
FLOW INFORMATION FOR 0-UO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 3908
OILLON HESE.KVOIH
MEAN MONTHLY FLOKS AND UAILt FLOKSICMbl
MONTrl rtAk MEAN FLOW
3906F1
3908G1
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
0.57
O.B8
0.34
0.20
0.07
0.12
1.02
0.82
1.30
0.74
1.13
1.81
0.48
0.68
0.28
0.17
0.06
0.10
0.82
0.68
1.05
0.62
0.93
1.50
3^71
1.47
o.au
0.34
O.S7
4.62
3.60
5.5?
3.J6
5
3
ti
12
16
14
11
<4
13
9
y
20
S
3
a
12
16
14
11
9
13
y
9
2U
hLOW OAf
FLOW OAY
FLO*
0.71
0.42
0.14
0.03
u.H
0.20
0.65
0.71
1.36
0.88
0.42
0.34
0.20
0.11
0.01
0.14
0.16
0.68
0.57
1.10
0.74
0.37
23
33
23
23
1.70
1.13
1.39
0.93
7.4?
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOWET r^tfrflEVAL UATt VD/Ul/27
39 59 38.U 062 Ob 02.0
UILL1UN
39119 OHIO
DATE TIME
FROM OF
TO DAY FtiET
73/04/26 13 35 OQuO
13 35 0005
13 35 OOlb
13 35 0025
73/U7/30 13 ?5 JOOO
13 25 0005
13 25 U010
13 ?5 JU15
13 25 0020
73/10/08 13 40 OOUO
13 40 0005
13 40 0015
13 40 0025
CtNT
16. J
16. J
15.7
14.6
25.4
25.0
24.3
24.6
23.9
21.2
21.1
20.9
20. 1
OOJOU
00
MG/L
9.2
n.l
4.2
4.6
"J.I
j.7
3.4
2.B
l.u
OoU77
TRri:^SP CiMDUCTVY
SECCH£ FIELD
IrJCHtS MICKUMHO
20
36ij
390
400
390
340
340
34U
335
314
510
510
500
44U
lit PALES
3
004UO
HH
bU
h.4Ci
fa. 30
B.lu
7.9i>
a. 10
7.50
f.4o
7.90
7.5u
7.40
7.2'J
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mb/L
136
138
121
121
102
103
99
140
146
145
135
2111202
0030
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.10U
0.100
0.100
0.390
0.090
0.330
0.450
0.510
0.6JO
0.770
0.940
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.200
1.000
1.000
1.500
1.600
1.500
1.500
2.200
2.300
2.900
3.100
00630
N02&N03
IM-TOTAL
Mii/L
1.300
1.200
1.300
1.200
1.080
1.180
1.260
0.930
0.890
1.090
1.290
00671
PMOS-UIS
ORTHO
MG/L H
0.008
0.004
0.006
0.020
0.031
0.051
0.038
0.021
0.024
0.037
0.041
32217
JAfE
TO
73/04/26
73/^7/30
73/lU/Ort
TIME L
itPTH f'HUS-TOT C
DAY FEET MG/L f
13
i3
13
1^
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
35
35
35
35
?5
?S
?S
40
40
•+0
40
uoOO
OOC5
OU15
0025
oooa
U015
Oo2u
ijOOO
OOiiS
0015
0025
o
0
i
0
0
0
t!
il
0
u
0
.122
. 1?2
. 12ts
.204
. 1 jo
. Ib3
.232
.0^7
.Iii2
.149
,2o^
nLf
-------
STORtT RETRIEVAL (JATt
tO 01 ud.O 082 07 dt.O
DILLON
3-*liy OHIO
J0010
OAft TIME DtPTri WAFLK
FSOM OF TEMP
Tu DAY FEET CENT
73/i)t/26 14 00 OOUO -14.1
it 00 0003 14.0
14 00 0010 It.u
7J/07/30 it 00 0000 ?S.t
ItOOUOOft 2t.2
73/10/08 It OS 0000 21.4
00300
uo
MO/L
10. Si
fl.d
H.O
b.4
«,6
OU077
THANSP
StCCHI
INCHES
16
12
2t
00094
CNDUCTtfY
K1ELU
MICrfOMHO
S'JO
400
3S5
385
420
50b
llEH.i
J
ObtOO
PH
bU
CJ.UO
8.0o
8.0u
b.30
7.60
6.50
00410
T ALK,
CAC03
Mti/L
128
I2a
128
119
134
143
211
0013
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.240
0.240
U.2tO
0.100
0.260
0.300
1202
FEET
00
TOT I
N
MG.
1
1
1
1
1
3
DEPTH
1.100
100
1.100
1.400
1.800
200
00630
N02&N03
N-TUTAL
HG/L
1.600
1.500
1.500
1.350
1.200
1.120
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.034
0.038
0.031.
0.050
0.076
0.031
DAFt FIME DE^TH HHUi-TOF
Fh(OM UF
10 DAY FEET Hb/L P
73/04/26 It 00 OUOO
It 00 J003
It 00 0010
73/J7/3U Jt 00 UoCO
It 00 OJ06
14 05
ii. 1 7 7
0.172
0.176
u . ivb
32217
CHLHPHYL
A
UG/L
12.7
-------
bTOKtT RETnltVAL OAlt
J90803
40 Oc! 24.0 082 OB 23.0
DILLON
J911* OHIO
DATt TIME DEPTH
F*OH OF
TO UAr FEET
3b 0000
35 U004
35 1)007
?0 UOOO
OU01Q
TtHF
CENT
73/lu/OH
14.9
13,4
13.1
Iv.o
•J.2
003uO
oo TKANSH CNOJCTvr
5ECCH1 FIELO
MG/L INCHES MICKOMrlO
ib
11
430
430
43u
ilEPALES
00400
PH
su
a. oo
8.00
b.OO
7.70
00410
T ALK
CftC03
Ml>/L
142
142
14?
2111202
0009 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MO/L
0.290
0.280
0.2UO
0.770
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
1.000
0.900
2.900
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.600
1.600
1.600
1.590
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.061
0.058
0.056
0.093
DATE
Ft^OM
TO
73/04/26
Ul*b6b
TIME OLHTH PHOS-TOT
OK
liAV FEET MG/L P
32217
lu 35 OOOi) u.135
14 35 0004 U.13J
14 35 uOO^ U.1.J2
7J/10/08 14 ?u wOJO 0.3JO
OG/L
10.8
20.2
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORtT RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3908A1
39 59 29.0 062 04 55.0
LICKING RIVER
39041 7.5 ZANESVILLE W
O/DILLON rttSEKVOlK
AT DAM SPILLWAY
11EPALES 21112U4
^ 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/05
73/06/03
73/0 //Q&
73/03/12
73/U9/16
73/10/14
7J/11/1I
73/12/09
74/01/13
74/U2/09
74/02/23
74/03/04
74/03/23
74/Of/ZO
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02
115
170
130
130
135
130
18u
155
153
160
120
045
DEPTH
-------
STOKE.I RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
40 03 30.0 082 20 17.0
LICMMG Kl^EH
39 7.5 HANOVEH
I/DILLON HESErJVOlh*
h*r BKOG dTwN MA«NE AND NE*AI*K
lltPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FrtOM
TU
73/05/05
73/06/03
73/07/08
7J/UB/12
73/09/16
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/09
74/01/13
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/y3/09
74/U3/23
74/04/20
00630 00625
TIME DEpTH N02t.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TUTAL N
DAY FEET
16
10
10
12
11
10
12
12
11
12
13
14
12
13
15
30
b-5
15
35
45
30
15
40
30
55
00
04
50
MG/L
1.
1.
2.
0.
1.
0.
u.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
100
720
020
840
060
900
920
400
60 0
900
000
200
440
040
MG/L
3.000
3.500
3.300
3.800
9.900
8.190
2.900
1.200
2.350
1.100
1.300
1.600
1.700
2.000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-U1S PriOS-UT
TOTAL URTHO
MG/L
0.
1.
1.
2.
6.
3.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
410
000
2bO
200
700
200
140
356
160
440
220
490
710
000
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
021
147
190
620
336
336
352
118
124
075
035
035
790
107
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
a
0
0
0
0
. IcJO
.220
.300
.750
.b8u
.590
.490
.230
.195
.120
.150
.135
.890
.130
-------
STOrtET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
390801
40 OS 33.0 082 03 44.0
blii KUN
39 7.5 DRESDEN
T/OILLON RESErtVOiK
KT 77 BROo 3 »l SW OF UKESOEN
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/05
73/06/03
73/07/08
73/08/12
73/09/lt,
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/09
74/02/09
74/02/2J
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/20
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH iM02t.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
14
10
09
10
10
09
10
10
09
10
10
11
11
28
20
45
30
10
25
40
15
40
40
45
10
00
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
l>.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
330
260
270
140
056
029
208
570
980
820
420
660
300
MG/L
0.
1.
2.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
910
600
600
dOO
260
100
150
100K
100
200
200
200
100
00610 OU671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PMOS-TOT
TOTAL OPTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
'J.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
050
130
105
046
357
063
036
032
04Q
030
025
025
025
MG/L
0.
p
OOSK
0.012
0.
0.
J.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
016
024
010
010
020
008
010
010
005
005
005
MG/L P
0.012
0.02u
0.030
0.030
0.080
0.030
0.035
0.015
U.015
0.025
0.035
O.OlU
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOtfN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
390bCl
<+0 03 58.0 082 07 06.U
bTUMP KUN
39 7.5 DRESDEN
T/GILLON KESEKVOIR
UNIMPROVED *D BRDG 3 Ml
11EPALES
OF F^AZEYBUKG
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FKUM
TO
73/05/05
73/Ob/03
73/07/08
73/0«/12
73/09/16
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/09
74/iM/U
7<*/02/09
7WU2/23
7^/03/0^
7t./03/23
7^/o^/ao
U0630 00625
TIME DEPTH MG2*>N03 TOT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
GAY Ffc.£.T
15
10
U9
10
10
09
11
10
09
10
11
11
11
10
00
30
S7
40
30
40
05
45
45
30
20
IS
26
15
MG/L
0.
0.
U.
0.
0.
0.
0.
(J.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
357
115
092
070
022
025
148
561)
6dO
850
«UJ
320
528
260
MG/L
1.
1.
3.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
050
320
100
460
920
500
10UK
400
100K
100
20U
200
hOO
200
Ou6lO 00671 00665
NH3-N HrtOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OKTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
069
130
147
105
110
072
048
036
040
035
02u
020
070
040
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
(J.
0.
0.
0.
0.
a.
0.
p
Q05K
ooe
010
Oil
006
012
012
005K
012
OOb
OOb
OOSK
010
QOb
MG/L f>
O.OlU
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.03s
0.050
0.030
0.010
U.012
0.005
O.u2:>
0.04u
u.010
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOrttT RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
05 25.0 082 16 20.0
FOkK
39 7.5 HANOVEK
T/ulLLON HESFrtVOlW
2NDKY KD BKOG .75 Ml N OF HANOVER
lltPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
ro
7V05/05
73/06/03
73/07/OH
73/0«/12
73/0^/lb
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/09
74/01/13
74/U2/OS
74/02/23
74/y j/09
74/U3/23
7^/u^/20
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
OAY FEtT
15
11
10
11
11
10
11
11
10
11
12
12
13
12
40
40
25
20
00
10
45
00
15
00
00
15
30
20
MG/L
1
U
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
.000
.560
.420
.410
.7
.t,70
.430
.260
.430
.440
.000
.100
.«2u
MG/L
1.
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5*0
730
260
500
230
100
100K
100K
200
100
300
200
100
100
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
a.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
086
090
039
050
026
040
012
020
016
015
015
015
020
025
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
005K
008
OOH
Oil
007
022
012
008
012
005
010
005K
005
005K
MG/L P
0.010
0.025
0.02U
O.U20
0.025
0.022
0.013
0.017
0.015
0*010
0.045
O.CtO
0.010
K VALUE KNOrfN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
UAF[
390BL1
T/ulLLON
IB SO.O
LJiM
7.S MAiMOVEK
KU HRUG rt EDGE OF MArtNE
211120*
0000 FEET DEPTH
UATt
FROM
To
Tint
OF
UAV
OOfrJO
UEPJi UU^MNOj
N- TOTAL
Ft.tr MU/L
00b2b
TUT KJi-.L
N
MO/L
00610 00o71
Nnj-N HrtJb-DIb
TOTAL ORTnO
"!'j/L MG/L P
0(jbb5
PhOb- IOT
M&/L **
73/00/03
U
16
11
if1.
11
10
12
1 1
10
11
1 3
1 i
11
13
OS
45
00
4$
?0
IS
30
SO
.30
Ib
00
20
00
0.700
^ . b 3 J
L/ . 7 1 J
0 .blu
O.<*60
i' .^30
o.7r>0
1.^00
1.260
1 . 2oO
1.100
if, 6VU
u.720
j . e>-+o
O.B<+0
1 . I^O
1 .H90
l.OOJ
1 • d8
0.078
0.0^3
0 .«30
O.loO
0.100
o.oi?'*
U.OZK
0.0^0
u . 0 1 u
0 .0 lu
0.015
u .02o
0.011
U.013
ii.C*17
o.Oifrt
0.056
0.025
0 .0 1 H
0 . Jtic
0.016
J.010
u . 0 1 0
0.005
J.ulO
O.OCib
U.04U
0*030
O.OSS
0.090
0.060
O.u20
0.035
0.0 I-D
O.O^b
U.035
O.Ol/
-------
STOrtET HETSIEVAL DATE 7b/02/03
J908F1
40 03 05*0 082 10 05.0
CCAYL1CK CrtEEK
39 7.5 HANOVEW
T/DILLON rttSEHVOirt
2NOKY KU UKOG 1 MI SW OF CLAYLICK
UEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FE£T DEPTH
DATE
FrtuM
TO
73/05/05
73/06/03
7J/07/08
73/08/12
7J/U9/16
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/09
7W01/13
74/02/09
74/02/23
7^/03/09
74/u3/23
74/04/20
00630 0062S
TIME DEPTH N02&i>(03 TOT KJEL
OF i\l-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
16
12
11
12
13
11
12
14
12
13
14
14
12
14
30
55
10
20
10
00
50
OU
20
20
30
30
00
30
M'o/L
u
0
1
0
0
u
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
.860
.660
.200
.860
.750
.410
.890
.520
.2bO
.300
.120
.720
.780
.7bO
MG/L
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
300
720
310
800
920
637
100K
10U
200
200
400
200
500
150
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PMOS-DIS PHOb-TOT
TOTAL OtfTHO
MG/L
0.
U.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
j.
037
042
072
Ga3
058
037
020
096
008
020
010
OlU
015
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
j.
0.
0.
H
006
009
018
009
012
022
020
040
005
005
OOb
005K
005
005
MG/L P
O.Olb
U.030
0.055
(J.020
0.09b
0.050
0.025
0.135
0.020
0.015
0.03^
U.Oti
0.02b
0.015
K VALUt KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3908G1
40 02 16.0 082 15 02.0
bRUihY FuRK
39 7.5 HANOVER
T/OILLON RESERVOIR
COVERED BROG 2.5 MI St OF CLAYLICK
11EPALES 21H204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/Ub
73/06/03
73/07/08
73/045/12
73/0*/lb
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/09
74/02/09
74/02/23
74/03/0*
7*t/03/2j
74/04/20
00630 00625
TIME OF.PTH M02&.N03 TOT KJEL
OF IM-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
16
13
11
11
13
12
13
12
14
It
15
11
15
40
40
20
40
40
30
15
00
00
55
00
55
15
MG/L
u
0
0
.260
.140
.168
U.09J
0
0
0
0
u
0
ii
0
0
.046
.012
. 1B4
.450
.616
.4^0
.252
.338
.9UO
MG/L
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
800
200
590
150
880
b50
200
300
10UK
200
100K
200
100
00610 00671 00665
MH3-N PHOS-UIS PHOb-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
037
Ob8
084
034
058
022
028
028
020
015
015
015
022
MG/L P MG/L P
0
0
0
I)
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
.005K
.008
.008
.006
.005K
.012
.008
.008
.005K .
.OU5K
.005K
.005K
.005K
0.010
0.020
0.02U
0.015
0.030
O.G1S
0.025
0.015
0.005
0.025
0.040
(J.UlO
o.oiu
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOHEI HETKIKVAL LlAFE 75/02/10
3908AA ASJ908AA
<*0 03 £5.0 082 21 42.0
P043000*
39 7.5 HANOVEK
T/.JILLON
LICKING
11EHALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FrtUM
10
73/09/04
Lf ( T) -
73/UV/05
73/ 1U/U1
Om-
73/10/02
73/11/05
CP ( n -
7j/ 1 l/Ub
73/12/04
O (T >-
73/12/05
74/u 1/0 1
c^tn-
74/01/02
74/u2/2«
Cf IT)-
74/OJ/Ol
74/04/01
ct3 ( n -
74/04/0-;
74/05/0 t
CP(T)-
74/ij5/Ort
74/Ub/Ob
CP ( T ) -
74/0 b/ 0 7
74/ 0 // 0 2
OD MONTHLlf
2u.OOO
14.000
0.378
1.200 J.ouO
21.000 0./2U
4.bOO
3.900 5.
i.bOO
8.900 9.000
27.000 1.680 4.500 'J.SOO 9.000
M.OOO 0.510 1.250 9.080
d.500
It. 000 1.050 2.200 11.900 d.7UU
7.500 8.950
9.200 9.150
9.2bO 8.900
23.UUO 2.700 3.500 8.640 a.880
22.000 0.600 1.95u 9.720 9.100
u.630 1.5SO 8.230 b.740
0.250 0.790 6.750 8.230
8.570
-------
STORET RETHJt'VAL DATE 75/02/03
DATE
FrtOM
TO
cpm-
00630
TIME DE.HTH NOie»iN03
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET 'MG/L
oa oo
l>6 00
00625
TUT KJEL
N
MG/L
62.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
rtG/L
41.000
40 03 25.0 Od2 21 42.0
39041 7.ti MANOVtK
T/DlLLON HtSEHVOiK
LICKING HlvEK
UEPALtb 21<»120
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
3908AA AP390«AA P002000
39 59 56.0 082 4U 23.U
PATASKALA
39 7.b PATASKALA
T/UILLOIM REiEWVOI*
bOUFn FOKK / LICKING RIVER
llEPALEb 214i2u4
<+ 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/10/09
73/11/14
73/12/18
74/ul/H
7^/02/1^
74/03/13
74/04/33
7Wy5/lb
74/06/20
74/07/17
74/OH/27
7A/U9/16
7<+/H>/l4
00630
TIME DEPTH iv02a,!M03
OF N-TOTAL
(MY FtET
10
14
12
10
13
U
ia
14
08
OB
12
oa
U9
15
30
35
05
50
45
55
15
30
25
25
15
00
MG/L
0
t)
1
1
i
0
0
0
1
U
0
0
0
.V20
.860
,<+40
.^tou
.120
.040
.7bO
.880
.140
.480
.040
.020
.043
0062b
TOT rsJEL
N
MG/L
2.600
4.9UO
4.300
7.400
8.200
6.200
8.300
12.000
6.300
1.400
4.300
5.SOO
10.000
OublU 00671 00665
NH3-N HriOS-DIS PMOS-TOT
TOTAL OMTHO
MG/L
0
0
a
u
0
0
J
0
0
0
0
0
0
.014
.110
.011
.150
.200
.050*
.110
.8bO
.065
.057
.ObOK
.063
.050*
MO/L P
3.200
3.500
4.000
4.700
4.bOu
b.900
4.000
4.550
3.700
2.500
2.200
50051 50053
FLUrt CONDUIT
RATE FLOw-MGU
MG/L P IMST MbU MONTHLV
3.400
4.300
5.000
5.400
5.BUO
7.000
7.200
7.bOO
5.400
3.800
3.100
J.55U
3.400
0.1Q2
0.220
0.254
0.198
0.3*2
0.320
0.304
0.2^.9
0.226
0.191
0.213
0.220
0.173
0.220
0.252
0.320
0.200
0.3bO
0.352
0.436
0.250
0.223
0.221
0.210
0.
------- |