U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
&GPO 697-O32
-------
REPORT
ON
HOLIDftY LAKE
HURON COUNTY
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No, 402
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE n 9 j
OHIO ENVIRONFENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND THE
OHIO NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Ohio Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sjectipns
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 12
VI. Appendices 13
-------
1i
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency for professional involvement, to the Ohio National Guard
for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Ohio wastewater treatment plant operators who provided
effluent samples and flow data.
Ned Williams, Director, and Tom Birch, Ken Carr, Larry
Dietrick, Ron Havlice, Larry Korecko, Rod Mehlhop, Terry Wheeler,
and John Youger, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most
useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Dana L. Stewart, then the Adjutant General
of Ohio, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel Robert C. Timmons,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Ohio National Guards-
men, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to
the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OHIO
LAKE NAME
Atwood
Beach City
Berlin
Buckeye
Charles Mill
Deer Creek
Delaware
Dillon
Grand Lake of St.
Grant
Holiday
Hoover
Indian
Loramie
Mosquito Creek
O'Shaughnessy
Pymatuning
Pleasant Hill
Rocky Fork
Shawnee
Tappan
Marys
COUNTY
Carroll, Tuscarawas
Stark* Tuscarawas
Mahoning, Portage, Stark
Fairfield, Licking, Perry
Ashland, Richland
Fayette, Pickaway
Delaware
Muskingum
Auglaize, Mercer
Brown
Huron
Delaware
Logan
Auglaize
Trumbull
Delaware
Ashtabula, OH; Crawford, PA
Ashland,
Highland
Greene
Harrison
Franklin
Shelby
OH; Crawford,
Richland
-------
41-06'—
41° 04'—
x^HOLIDAY LAKE
^® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
f Sewage Treatment Plant
•3 Drainage Area Boundary
1 ?Km.
Scale
{•Mi.
82M2-
82-40'
-------
HOLIDAY LAKE
STORE! NO. 3930
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Holiday Lake is eutrophic. It ranked
fifteenth in overall trophic quality when compared to the other
19 Ohio lakes sampled in 1973 using a combination of six lake
parameters*. Thirteen of the lakes had less median total phos-
phorus, 16 had less median dissolved phosphorus, nine had less
median inorganic nitrogen, 14 had less mean chlorophyll a^ and
three had greater mean Secchi disc transparency. Depletion of
dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at station 2 in July.
It is reported that algae and aquatic weeds are summer problems
in Holiday Lake (Ketelle and Uttormark, 1971).
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate phosphorus limitation at
the time the sample was taken (07/27/73). The lake data also
indicate phosphorus limitation in July; however, nitrogen limi-
tation is indicated in October.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The Willard wastewater treatment facility
is estimated to have contributed 81.7$ of the total phosphorus
load reaching the lake during the sampling year. Septic tanks
are estimated to have contributed 0.5%.
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
The present loading of 8.41 g/m2/yr is nearly 12 times
that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974)
as a eutrophic loading (see page 11). While even complete
removal of the phosphorus loads from the Willard wastewater
treatment plant and the septic tanks would only reduce the loading
to 1.5 g/m2/yr (about twice the eutrophic loading), it is likely
that a high degree of phosphorus removal at the Willard plant would
result in an improvement in the water quality of Holiday Lake.
2. Non-point sources—Phosphorus from non-point sources
amounted to 17.8% of the total load reaching the lake, but none
of the tributaries had high export rates (see page 11).
The Unnamed Streams A-2 and C-l contributed 8.2% and 3.1%,
respectively. The ungaged drainage area was estimated to have
contributed 4.1%.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 0.19 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 3.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >4.9 meters.
4. Volume: 3.549 x 106 m3.
5. .Mean hydraulic retention time: 103 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* Qn3/sec)*
Unnamed Stream (A-2) 14.7 0.1
Unnamed Stream (B-lj 4.5 <0.1
Unnamed Stream (C-1) 7.3 0.1
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 8.3 0.1
Totals 34.8 0.4
2. Outlet -
Unnamed Stream (A-l) 35.7** 0.4
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 99.4 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 89.4 centimeters.
t Table of metric equivalents—Appendix B.
tt Youger, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
4
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Holiday Lake was sampled two times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
two stations on the lake and from two or more depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phyto-
plankton identification and enumeration; and during the July visit, a
single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays.
Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the
stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 2.7
meters at station 1 and 4.9 meters at station 2.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP
D1SS OXY (MG/LI
CNDCTVY (MCROHO)
PM (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L>
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (HG/Ll
N02«N03 (MG/LI
AMHONIA (MG/L>
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCH1 (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 7/27/73)
2 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR HOLIDAY LAKE
STORET CODE 3930
2ND SAMPLING (10/ 6/73)
2 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (10X 8/73)
0 SITES
RANGE
81. 7
0.0
506.
7.2
116.
0.068
0.010
0.080
0.100
1.400
1.480
14.9
0.9
Zl>. f
9,4
- 579.
8«8
192.
- 0.408
- 0.249
- 0.160
- 3.800
- 5.300
- 3.920
- 5.420
• 43.4
0.9
MEAN
25.5
5.4
560.
8.1
133.
0.132
0.053
0.117
0.624
2.229
0.941
2.346
29.1
0.9
MEDIAN
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
£G.d
7.2
560.
6.3
121.
.086
.019
.120
.300
.860
29. 1
0.9
RANGE
IV. O
7.2
506.
0
0
0
0
2
2
Itt
125.
.142
.033
.150
.390
.470
0.8
£U«U
8.2
- 532.
8.4
131.
- 0.256
- o.oas
- 0.180
- 0.660
- 3. ISO
- 107.1
0.8
MEAN
19.9
7.S
522.
H.I
129.
0. 196
0.063
0.160
0.550
2.880
81.5
0.8
MEDIAN
20.0
7.3
530.
0
0
0
0
3
o.v
130.
.214
.076
.150
.640
.050
81.5
0.8
RANGE MEAN MEDIA!
*•»*«• -A*********************
»»•••* _*****•*•*•*******•*«••
«»**«* ->«»«**»»o«****<»>»«*>
*••»»• _•«*»»*•«*»•*•»*••••***
**«»** -•»*»»«*««••••••••••*••
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton* -
Sampling
Date
10/06/73
Dominant Algal Units
Genera per ml
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Coelosphaerium sp_.
Microcystis sp.
Melosira s£.
Cryptomonas sp.
Trachelomonas sp.
Other genera
827
229
92
46
23
139
Total
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
07/27/73
10/06/73
Station
Number
01
02
01
02
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mq/1)
Ortho P
Cone, (mq/1)
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
1,356
Chlorophyll a_
(yq/1)
43.4
14.9
107.1
56.0
Maximum yield
Control
0.050 P
1.0 N
0.056
0.106
0.056
1.178
1.178
2.178
21.0
24.0
20.0
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Holiday Lake was very high at the time the assay sample
was collected.
There was some increase in yield with an increase in
The July phytoplankton sample was lost in shipment.
-------
7
orthophosphorus, but the growth response was not significantly
different than the control when only nitrogen was added (i.e.,
phosphorus limitation is indicated). Note that the combined
phosphorus and nitrogen spike was inadvertently omitted.
The assay alga may have been inhibited by other factors
since none of the yields reached the maximum potential. This
suggests a possible toxic substance and/or limitation by some
other factor.
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in July (the
mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratio was 16/1, and
phosphorus limitation would be expected). However, nitrogen
limitation is indicated in October when the mean N/P ratio
was 11/1.
-------
8
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Ohio National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of February and March when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Ohio District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries, except
the Unnamed Stream (B-1), were determined by using a modification of
a U.S. Geological Survey computer program for calculating stream
loadings*. However, the nutrient loads estimated for the Willard waste-
water treatment plant exceeded the loads measured in the Unnamed Stream
at station B-1, and the background nutrient loadings for this stream and
the unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.)
were estimated using the means of the nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at
stations A-2 and C-l and multiplying the means by the B-1 and ZZ areas
in km2.
The community of Willard did not participate in the Survey, and nutrient
loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 N/capita/year. It is assumed
that all of the loads reached the lake during the sampling year.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Name
Willard
Pop.
Served** Treatment
5,510
trickling
filter
Mean Flow
(m3/d)***
2,085.5
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/
yr
625
170
240
Source
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Unnamed Stream (A-2)
Unnamed Stream (B-l)
Unnamed Stream (C-l)
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 315
c. Known municipal STP's -
Willard 6,250
d. Septic tankst - 35
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation - 1_5_
Total 7,650
Outputs -
Lake outlet - Unnamed Stream (A-l) 1,495
Net annual P accumulation - 6,155 kg.
Receiving
Water
Unnamed Creek
(B-l)
% of
total
8.2
2.2
3.1
4.1
81.7
0.5
0.2
100.0
* Anonymous, 1971.
** 1970 Census.
*** Estimate based on 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
t Estimate based on 130 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
it See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Unnamed Stream (A-2) 14,790 23.6
Unnamed Stream (B-l) 5,595 8.9
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 10,800 17.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 10,315 16.5
c. Known municipal STP's -
Willard 18,740 29.9
d. Septic tanks* - 1,385 2.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 980 1.6
Total 62,605 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Unnamed Stream
(A-l) 28,635
3. Net annual N accumulation - 33,970 kg.
* Estimate based on 130 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Unnamed Stream (A-2) 43 1,006
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 33 1,479
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is one
at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain
eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which would result
in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
grams/m2/yr
Total
8.41
Accumulated
6.76
Total
68.8
Accumulated
37.3
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Holiday Lakes:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.72
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.36
-------
12
LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA Publ.
OWP-1, vol. 5, Wash., DC.
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in
the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr, Res. Ser., Proj.
#16010 EHR, Washington, DC.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the
phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Natl. Res.
Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland Waters,
Burlington, Ontario.
Youger, John, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry). OH
Env. Prot. Agency, Columbus.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
13
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED 8Y INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
INDEX NO
1 392d ATwUGD RESERVOIR
2 3-J21 MOSOUITO CREEK RESERVOIR
3 3924 PLEASANT MILL LAKE
4 3929 8Er*L!N RESERVOIR
5 3914 HOCWER RESERVOIR
6 3934 TAPPAN LAKE
7 3927 LAKE SAINT MARYS
8 3932 ROCKY FOHK LAKE
9 3906 OEER CREEK RESERVOIR
10 3901 BEACH CITY KtSERVOIR
11 3915 INDIAN LAKE
12 3907 DELAWARE RESERVOIR
13 3912 GRANT LAKE
14 3->33 SHAtfNEE LAKt
15 3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
16 3905 CHARLtS MILL RESERVOIR
17 3902 UUCKEYE LAKE
18 390B UILLION RESERVOIR
19 3917 LORAHIE LAKE
20 3931 O'SHAUGNESSf RESERVOIR
483
439
392
361
297
292
290
277
26b
263
261
?49
220
216
207
206
178
173
-------
PERCENT OF L&KES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBEH OF
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3V01 6EACM CITr W
390? 30CKEVE LAKE
3905 CHARLES HILL RESERVOIR
390t> DEE* C«EEK RESERVOIR
3907 DELAWARE RESERVOIR
3908 DILL10N RESERVOIW
3912 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESERVUl*
3915 INUIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO CREEK HESERVOIK
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
3927 LAKE SAINT MAWtS
3928 ATWUOD RESERVOIR
3929 bCHLlN RESERVOIR
3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
3931 O'SHAUGNESST KEStKVOIP
3932 ROCKY FORK LAKE
3933 SMAWNEE LAKE
3934 FAPPAN LA*E
*ITH HIGHE* VALUES)
MEDIAM
TOTAL P
37 (
11 <
26 (
S3 1
58 <
16 (
47 (
87 f
42 1
5 1
74 1
95 (
21 <
100 i
79 i
32 i
0 i
68
63 •
87
7)
2)
5)
; 10)
: ID
: 3)
: 9i
: i6>
1 8)
1 1)
I 14)
! 18)
I 4)
[ 191
1 15)
1 6)
I 0)
( 13)
( 12)
( 16)
MEDIAN
INOrto N
21 (
76 <
63 (
5 (
16 (
32 (
58 (
26 t
76 <
37 <
100 (
6fl I
95 (
89 (
42 <
53 (
0 (
47 (
11 (
ti4 (
4)
14)
12)
1)
3)
6)
11)
5)
14)
7)
19)
13)
18)
17)
6)
10)
0)
9)
2)
16)
500-
MEAN SEC
11
5
37
63
32
42
16
89
21
0
82
100
26
95
74
82
47
58
53
68
(
<
(
(
(
(
(
<
(
(
(
<
(
(
(
(
<
(
(
I
2)
1)
7)
12)
6)
8)
3)
17)
4)
0)
15)
19)
5)
16)
14)
15)
9)
11)
10)
13)
MEAN
CHLOHA
84 (
0 (
21 <
95 <
89 1
58 <
32 <
79 <
16 <
5 <
53 1
63 <
11 1
68 1
74 1
26 i
100 1
42 (
37 i
47 i
16)
0)
4)
18)
17)
11)
6)
15)
; 3)
: i)
: 10)
; 12)
1 2)
I 13)
[ 14)
I 5)
I 19)
I 8)
1 7)
1 9)
15-
M1N DO
82
89
11
63
47
53
74
32
58
97
82
39
97
39
68
11
26
11
11
11
( 15)
( 17)
( 0)
( 12)
< 9)
( 10)
( 14)
( 6)
( ID
( 18)
( 15)
( 7)
( 18)
< 7)
( 13)
( 0)
( 5)
< 0)
( 0)
( 0)
MEOIAN
DIS5 OrtTriO C
42 I
26 (
58 (
11 <
21 (
5 (
34 (
79 <
53 (
34 (
92 (
66 <
47 (
100 (
92 (
16 (
0 (
66 (
74 <
84 <
8)
5)
11)
2)
4)
1)
6)
15)
10)
6)
17)
12)
9)
19)
17)
3)
0)
12)
14)
10)
INLtEX
NO
277
207
216
290
263
206
261
392
266
178
483
431
297
491
429
220
173
292
249
381
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3901 BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
3902 BUCKEYE LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL RESERVOIR
3906 DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
3907 DELAWARE RESERVOIR
3908 D1LL10N RESERVOIR
3912 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESERVOIR
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO CREEn RESERVOIR
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
3927 LAKE SAINT MARYS
3928 ATWOOD RESERVOIR
3929 BERLIN RESERVOIK
3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
3931 O'SHAOGNESSY RESERVOIR
3932 ROCKY FORK LAKE
3933 SHArfNEE LAKE
3934 TAPPAN LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.122
0.179
0.127
0.098
0.086
0.163
0.113
0.040
0.120
0.165
0.058
0.036
0.148
0*031
0,042
0.125
0.203
0.067
0.0b9
0.040
MEDIAN
iNOrtG N
1.990
0.380
0.465
2.980
2.340
1.590
0.570
1.640
0.380
1.380
0.150
0.455
0.200
0.205
0.900
0.575
3.070
0.790
2.380
0.230
500-
MEAN SEC
489.000
490.000
482.555
470.125
4B4.111
481.250
486.333
462.750
485.222
494.000
465.333
456.833
484.167
462.000
465.435
465.333
479.333
473.000
474.333
466.111
MEAN
CHLOKA
10.867
186.567
67.144
9.887
10.856
27.400
40.533
13.017
76.855
104.100
36.267
22.850
79.150
16.442
15.496
55.350
5.522
38.022
39.567
37.711
15-
MIN DO
11.600
9.600
15.000
13.900
14.500
14.300
12.200
14.800
14.200
8.200
11.600
14.700
8.200
14.700
13.600
15.000
14.900
15.000
15.000
15.000
MEOIAN
DISS ORTHO P
O.Olb
0.020
0.011
0.036
0.024
0.037
0.019
0.008
0.012
0.019
0.006
0.010
0.014
0.005
0.006
0.034
0.159
0.010
0.009
0.007
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSIONS FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIbUTAHY FLO* INFORMATION FCJK OHIO
1/27/75
LAKE COLJE 3930
HOLIDAY LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AtfEA OF LAKE(SQ KMI
SUB-OKAlNAiiE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KMI
35.7
NORMALIZED FLOtiS(CMS)
3930A1
3930A2
393UB1
3930C1
35.7
14.7
4.5
7.3
9.2
JAN
0.51
O.Ob
0.10
0.13
Fife
0.62
0.26
0.08
0.13
0.16
MAK
0.37
0.12
0.19
APR
0.74
0.31
0.10
0.1S
0.19
MAY
0.18
0.05
0.09
0.11
JUN
0.23
U.09
0.03
0.05
0.06
JUL
O.lb
O.Ob
0.02
0.03
AUG
0.07
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
SEP
O.OS
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
OCT
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
NOV
0.13
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.03
otc
0.28
0.12
0.04
0.06
0.07
MEAN
0.35
0.14
0.04
0.07
U.09
SUMMARY
OTAL
iUM ilf
DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SOB-DHAINAGt AREAS =
35.7
35.7
TOTAL FLOW
TOTAL FLOW
IN =
OUT =
4. IB
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS ANU DAILY FLOWStCMSI
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAH
3930A1
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW UAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3930A2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
0.68
0.74
0.34
0.10
O.OS
0.18
0.27
0.40
0.79
0.46
0.82
0.4d
0.2B
0.31
O.U
0.04
0.02
0.07
0.11
0.16
0.31
0.20
0.34
0.20
S
2
2
6
16
7
11
2
5
2
2
7
5
2
2
6
16
7
11
2
5
2
2
7
0.26
0.20
0.23
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.1U
0.13
0.12
0.59
0.51
0.10
0.08
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.05
U.24
0.21
16
16
16
16
0.20
2.38
o.oa
0.99
-------
TRIBUTARY H_LW INFORMATION KOrt
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 3930
HOLIDAY LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS ANu UAILY FLOWS (CMS)
TRlriUTAriY MONTH YEA* MEAN FLOW DAY
3930B1
393UC1
5
6
7
rf
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
H
9
10
11
1?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
u.oa
0.09
O.U4
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.10
0.06
0.11
0.06
0.14
0.15
0.07
0.12
0.01
0.03
0.05
a.oa
U.lb
U.10
0.17
0.10
0.18
0.19
o.o a
O.U2
0.01
O.J4
0.07
0.10
o.zo
0.12
O.kf?
J.12
5
2
2
6
Ib
7
11
2
S
2
2
7
5
2
2
b
16
7
11
2
5
2
2
7
KLOW DAt
KLOW UAY
FLOW
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.01
O.Ot
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.08
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.05
0*01
0.0
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.12
o.lC
16
16
16
16
u.03
0.31
0.0<4
0.51
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOHET KtTWlEVAL OAT£ 75/02/10
393001
41 06 10.0 082 43 3b.O
hOLlUAV LAKE
39 OHIO
DATE
FrtOM
TO
73/07/27
73/10/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
[JAY FEET
13 00 0000
13 00 0005
13 00 0009
10 05 0000
10 05 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
26.7
26.6
26.4
19.7
19.6
U0300 U3077
DO TKANSP
SECCHI
MG/L INCHES
9.4
9.0
8.2
7.4
32
HEPALES
3
2111202
0011 FEET
DEPTH
94
Ti/Y
1
'MHO
546
546
546
506
508
00400
PH
SU
8.60
8.8u
8.50
8.40
8.00
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
118
119
116
128
125
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.100
0.140
0.410
0.390
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.600
1.500
1.400
2.500
2.300
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.080
0.080
0.180
0.170
00671
PHOS-OIS
OUT HO
MG/L P
0.017
0.017
0.019
0.035
0.033
U0665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLKPHYL
Ft^OM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/U7/27 13 00 0000 0.079 43.4
13 00 0005 0.0d6
13 00 0009 0.091
73/10/06 10 05 0000 0.142 1U7.1
10 05 0005 u.149
-------
STORET KtfRlEVAL DATE 75/02/10
393002
41 OS 31.0 082 43 50.0
HOLIDAY LAKE
39 OHIO
DATE
FrtOM
TO
73^07/27
73/10/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0010
13 30 0016
10 20 0000
10 20 0005
10 20 0011
00010
WATEk
TEMP
CENT
26.2
26.2
24. S
21.7
20.0
20.0
20.0
00300
00
MG/L
7.2
1.3
0.0
7.2
7.2
00077 00094
TKAi^SP CNOUCTVr
SECCH1 FIELD
INCHES M1CROMHO
36
572
579
572
560
532
532
HEP ALES
3
00400
PH
SO
8.3U
7.bO
7.50
7.80
8.10
8.00
7.90
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mb/L
124
121
141
192
131
130
131
2111202
0018
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.310
0.300
1.000
3.800
U.660
0.650
0.640
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.000
1.700
2.100
5.300
3.000
2.900
2.900
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.160
0.160
0.100
0.120
0.150
0.150
0.150
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.022
0.040
0.249
0.085
0.084
0.076
DATE TIME DEPTH
FHOM or
TO DAY FEET
73/07/27 13 30 0000
13 30 OOU5
13 30 0010
13 30 OOlb
73/10/06 10 20 0000
10 ?0 0005
10 20 U011
liC665
3S-TOT
3/L P
U.066
D.085
0.109
0.404
0.221
O.Ssb
U.214
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
If .9
56.0
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
KETH1EVAL DATE 75/02/U3
41 06 18.0 OH2 43 46.0
UiMNAMEO STKEAM
J9151 7.5 WILLAKD
O/HOLIOAY LAKE
if HWY 162 BrtOG BELO 0AM
lltPALLS 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
7V05/05
73/06/02
73/07/0*!
73/09/16
73/10/07
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/05
74/U2/02
74/02/16
74/03/02
74/03/16
74/04/07
74/05/03
00630 00625
TIME OtPTH N02^N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
10
08
14
11
13
09
12
11
10
14
14
13
19
00
30
00
00
45
30
15
00
30
00
30
00
30
15
MG/L MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
1
1
1
1
0
.530 1.690
.126 1.500
.350 E.800
.115 0.910
.115 2.300
.510
.780
. lt>fa
.000
.900
.920
.600
.500
.300
.600
.500
.600
.400
.800
.700
.100
.470 0.500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PhOS-DlS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTnO
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
074
370
020
154
0.570
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
320
440
360
388
310
430
375
070
015
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
H
007
014
136
020
150
044
056
012
040
030
020
025
035
020
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.080
.060
.250
.075
.290
.105
.125
.09U
.135
.105
.115
.180
.160
.045
-------
bTOHET KETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
41 04 30.0 032 43 45.0
UiNNAMtU STk£AM
J9 7.5 WlULAkO
1/HULIOAf LAI\E
EGYPT *Q bKOG l.b MI N OH WlLLAKO
JlEPALtS 211120'+
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/05
73/06/02
73/07/02
73/UtJ/Ob
73/G9/lb
73/10/0?
73/11/li
73/12/02
7-^/01/05
7*4/02/02
7^/02/16
74/03/02
7W03/16
74/J4/07
7t/0b/03
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OK .M- TOTAL N
UAY FEET
09
12
07
14
i2
14
09
12
12
12
14
Ib
ia
18
25
00
30
45
20
15
35
50
45
30
00
30
30
4b
MG/L
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
2.
1.
2.
2.
2.
1.
1.
2.
1.
0.
910
020
560
700
540
900
760
400
400
600
920
800
100
500
460
MG/L
1.
0.
1.
1*
2.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
2.
1.
1.
0.
BOO
960
800
*70
650
900
600
aoo
400
900
400
200
600
350
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OP-ThO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
075
029
090
072
ObO
064
028
136
360
140
350
090
100
065
015
MG/L
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P MG/L P
020
032
048
013
088 '
063
020
040
036
045
035
040
055
U37
015
0.060
0.090
0.110
O.U45
0.240
0.195
O.G2u
0.097
0.090
U.12U
0.100
0.220
0.38J
u.190
0.050
-------
STJRtT RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/02/03
393odl
41 04 3u.o 082 43 28.0
UNNAMED STREAM
39 7.5 allLLAKO
r/HOLiOAY LAKE
0.3 * OF EljYPT KL) HrfY 99 JCT
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/05
73/06/02
73/07/02
73/08/06
73/0^/16
73/10/07
73/11/11
73/12/02
74/01/05
7<+/u2/02
74/02/16
74/03/02
74/03/16
74/0^/07
74/05/03
00630
TIME DEPTH N02^N03
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET
09
11
03
15
12
14
10
13
14
11
15
15
18
43
00
00
15
15
50
15
00
20
00
30
00
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
2
u
0
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
.220
.720
.970
.820
.700
.040
.064
.960
.000
.830
.650
.200
.600
.510
.800
00625
TOT KJEL
N
HG/L
9.
9.
12.
16.
9.
5.
12.
7.
9.
10.
1.
7.
1.
1.
0.
900
900
000
800
600
600
000
300
500
000
600
400
800
200
900
00610 00671 0066S
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL URTHO
MG/L
6.
4.
8.
13.
7.
3.
4.
4.
4.
3.
0*
2.
0.
0.
0.
050
500
BOO
600
000
400
700
400
700
670
315
500
375
080
060
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
350
126
460
152
180
480
288
13b
064
060
030
235
030
040
010
MG/L P
0.890
0.950
1.4SQ
2.6JO
0.780
1.500
0.830
0.780
0.720
0.690
0.195
2.200
0.180
0.155
0.055
DEPTH
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL OATt£ 75/02/03
10.0
393CC1
tl O'j 35.0 082 42
UNNA l£D STREAM
39 7.5 rflLLArtu
T/HULIOAY LAKE
LlTON RD 6ROG 2 Ml N£ OF
11EPALE.S
<*
2111204
0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FHOM
ro
7J/05/OS
73/06/02
73/07/02
73/06/06
73/09/16
73/10/07
73/11/11
73/12/0*?
7<*/Ol/05
74/02/02
7<*/02/16
74/03/02
74/03/lb
74/04/07
7^/05/03
Ou630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF h4-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
11
08
16
11
15
11
13
11
11
16
14
14
20
00
30
30
00
IS
20
10
30
00
46
00
20
00
00
M13/L
d.
c.
d.
0.
0.
11.
0.
b.
3.
2.
1.
4.
1.
1.
0.
420
850
500
058
490
600
Od4
600
600
640
920
300
<+ao
520
800
MG/L
2.
1.
1.
2.
0.
2.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
700
690
760
000
820'
200
900
100
500
000
500
800
300
500
900
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-UIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OtfTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
078
lub
094
170
088
083
016
032
050
035
360
070
100
270
065
MG/L
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0*
o.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
009
017
021
016
022
089
028
020
012
015
030
075
045
025
010
MG/L P
0.02S
0.050
0.045
0.090
0.075
0.185
0.055
0.035
0.030
0.055
0.100
0.410
0.250
0.095
0.055
------- |