U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
IfCIAN LAKE
LOGAN COUNTY
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No,
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
& GPO 697-O32
-------
REPORT
ON
INDIAN
LOGAN COUNTY
OHIO
EPA REGION V
WORKING PAPER No,
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AND THE
OHIO NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Ohio Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs,
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency for professional involvement, to the Ohio National Guard
for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Ohio wastewater treatment plant operators who provided
effluent samples and flow data.
Ned Williams, Director, and Tom Birch, Ken Carr, Larry
Dietrick, Ron Havlice, Larry Korecko, Rod Mehlhop, Terry Wheeler,
and John Youger, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most
useful 1n the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Dana L. Stewart, then the Adjutant General
of Ohio, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel Robert C. Timmons,
who directed the volunteer efforts of the Ohio National Guards-
men, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to
the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OHIO
LAKE NAME
Atwood
Beach City
Berlin
Buckeye
Charles Mill
Deer Creek
Delaware
Dillon
Grand Lake of St.
Grant
Holiday
Hoover
Indian
Loramie
Mosquito Creek
O'Shaughnessy
Pymatuning
Pleasant Hill
Rocky Fork
Shawnee
Tappan
Marys
COUNTY
Carroll, Tuscarawas
Stark, Tuscarawas
Mahoning, Portage, Stark
Fairfield, Licking, Perry
Ashland, Richland
Fayette, Pickaway
Delaware
Muskingum
Auglaize, Mercer
Brown
Huron
Delaware, Franklin
Logan
Auglaize, Shelby
Trumbull
Delaware
Ashtabula, OH; Crawford, PA
Ashland, Richland
Highland
Greene
Harrison
-------
I—40'35
INDIAN LAKE
0 Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
f Sewage Treatment Plant
£ Drainage J\rea Boundary
I—40" 30
-------
INDIAN LAKE
STORET NO. 3915
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data Indicate that Indian Lake is eutrophic. It
ranked eleventh in overall trophic quality when the 20 Ohio
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of
six parameters*. Eleven lakes had less median total phos-
phorus, nine had less median dissolved phosphorus, four had
less and one had the same median inorganic nitrogen, 16 had
less mean chlorophyll a_, and 15 had greater Secchi disc trans-
parency. Depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred
at station 3 in October.
Survey limnologists reported an algal bloom in October
and noted that macrophytes were common in the shallow areas
near shore.
y
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Indian Lake was phos-
phorus limited at the time the sample was collected (05/04/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in May and August
as well, but nitrogen limitation in October.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—No municipal or industrial wastewater
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
treatment plants impacted Indian Lake during the sampling year,
and the mean estimated phosphorus contribution of shoreline
septic tanks amounted to only 4.2% of the total load reaching
Indian Lake during the sampling year. However, recent Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency investigations indicate major
pollution problems at the lake are over-development and by-
passing of sewage during wet periods when the capacity of sewer
lines is exceeded (Youger, 1975). Therefore, it is likely that
the estimation of septic tank phosphorus contributions is much
too low.
The calculated phosphorus loading of 0.28 g/m2/yr is less
than that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974)
as a eutrophic loading (see page 12). However, in view of the
trophic condition of the lake and the problems associated with
over-development noted above, it is probable that the actual load-
ing is much higher than that indicated, and a need for a more-
detailed study of the lake is indicated.
It is noted that an apparent phosphorus loss from the lake
occurred during the sampling year (see page 10). It is likely
that the "loss" resulted from underestimation of the shoreline
septic tank loads and solubilization of previously sedimented
phosphorus during the almost continuous dredging required to
maintain satisfactory depths in the lake (Youger, op. cit.)
2. Non-point sources—About 94% of the total phosphorus
input to Indian Lake is attributed to non-point sources. The
North Fork Miami River contributed 25.5% of the total, and the
-------
3
South Fork Miami River contributed 38.0%. Ungaged tributaries
and immediate drainage were estimated to have contributed 26.1%
of the total load.
The phosphorus export rates of the Indian Lake tributaries
were relatively low. The North Fork rate was 34 kg/km2/yr, and
the South Fork rate was 20 kg/km2/yr (see page 11). These rates
compare well with the 49 kg/km2/yr rate of Loramie Creek, a
tributary of nearby Lake Loramie*.
* Working Paper No. 405.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 24.82 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 2.3 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 3.6 meters.
4. Volume: 57.086 x 106 m3.
5, Mean hydraulic retention time: 275 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
,S. Fk., Miami River 129.5 1.2
N. Fk.s Miami River 51.5 0.5
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 52.7 0_._7_
Totals 233.7 2.4
2. Outlet -
Miami River 258.5** 2.4
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 105.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 92.2 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
ft Youger, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Indian Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
three stations on the lake and from one or more depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phyto-
plankton identification and enumeration; and during the first visit,
a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal
assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from
each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum depths
sampled were 1.5 meters at station 1, 0.9 meters at station 2, and
3.0 meters at station 3.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMCD
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTMO P
N02*N03 (MO/L)
AMMONIA (MQ/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
1ST SAMPLING ( 5/
3 SITES
RANGE MEAN
11.9 - 12.5 12.1
10.6 - 11.2 10.9
000. - 460. 435.
8.6 - 8.8 8.6
142. - 168. 154.
0.046 - 0.063 0.056
0.003 - 0.008 0.005
0.660 - 0.990 0.793
0.060 - 0,110 0.075
0.800 - 1.100 0.963
0.750 * 1.050 0.868
1.470 - 2.090 1.777
48.7 - 59.3 53.8
0.2 - 0.5 0.4
4/73)
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR INDIAN LAKE
STORET CODE 3915
2ND SAMPLING ( 8/ 2/73)
3 SITES
3RD SAMPLING 110/11/731
3 SITES
MEDIAN
12.0
10.9
420.
a. 6
151.
0.057
0.005
0.725
0.065
1.000
0.795
1.775
53.5
0.5
RANGE
23.4
7.8
355.
a. 6
123.
0.075
0.009
0.140
0.120
2.300
0.260
2.490
94.8
0.4
- 24.1
9.1
- 390.
8.9
- 137.
- 0.164
- 0.02S
- 0.360
- 0.150
- 2.900
- 0.530
- 3.140
- 114.2
0.5
MEAN
23.6
8.5
368.
a. 7
126.
0.128
0.015
0.245
0.137
2.617
0.382
2.862
105.3
0.4
MEDIAN
23.8
8.5
359.
8.7
124.
0.131
0.012
0.225
0.140
2.650
0.370
2.875
107.0
0.4
RANGE
18.6
0.6
295.
7.7
101.
0.124
0.02S
0.060
0.090
1.600
0.150
1.660
64.7
0.3
- 20.3
8.4
- 337.
9.0
- 126.
- 0.1S7
- O.OS1
- o.oeo
- o.iao
• 2.600
- 0.250
- 2. 680
- 76. 2
- 0.3
HE AN
19.4
4.8
312.
a. 4
113.
0.136
0.038
0.068
0.120
1.940
0.188
2.008
71.4
0.3
MEDIAN
19.5
4.2
310.
6.2
113.
0.133
0.036
0.070
0.100
1.800
0.180
1.870
73.3
0.3
-------
B. Biological characteristics;
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
05/04/73
08/02/73
10/11/73
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date'
05/04/73
08/02/73
10/11/73
Dominant Algal Units
Genera per ml
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Oscillatoria sp.
Ankistrodesmus (U sp.
Nitzschia sp.
Microcystis sp.
Raphidiopsis sp_.
Other genera
Total
Raphidiopsis sp.
Oscillatori a -sjj.
Nitzschia sp.
Synedra sp.
Lyngbya ip_.
Other genera
Total
Lyngbya sp.
Oscillatoria sp.
Nitzschia sp.
Merismopedia sj>_. ,
Microcystis sp.
Other genera
10,187
3,374
1,933
1,212
1,146
4,782
22,634
26,980
25,699
9,713
4,722
3,102
8,836
79,052
41,319
18,403
11,632
11,458
7,465
18,404
Total 108,681
Station Chlorophyll a_
Number • (yg/1)
01 48.7
02 59.3
03 53.5
01 107.0
02 114.2
03 94.8
01 73.3
02 76.2
03 ' 64.7
-------
8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mq/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control 0.024 0.428 4.5
0.050 P 0.074 0.428 22.2
0.050 P + 1.0 N 0.074 1.428 26.3
1.0 N 0.024 1.428 5.4
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
corniLtum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Indian Lake was moderately high at the time the sample
was collected (05/04/73). The addition of phosphorus alone
produced a significant increase in yield over that of the
control which indicates phosphorus limitation (note that
addition of nitrogen alone produced a yield which was not
significantly greater than that of the control).
The lake data also indicate limitation by phosphorus in
May and August (the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus
ratios were 17/1 or greater at all stations). However,
nitrogen limitation is indicated in October; i.e., the mean
N/P ratios were 5/1 or less at all stations, and nitrogen
limitation would be expected.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Ohio National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff month of March when three samples were collected. Sampling
was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April, 1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Ohio District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads,
in kg/km2/year, at station D-l and multiplying by the ZZ area in km2.
No municipal or industrial wastewater treatment plants impacted
Indian Lake during the sampling year.
A. Waste Sources**:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known Industrial - None
* See Working Paper No. 175.
** Youger, 1975.
-------
10
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
S. Fk., Miami River 2,645 38.0
N. Fk., Miami River 1,775 25.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 1,820 26,1
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 290 4.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 435 6.2
Total 6,965 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Miami River 9,500
3. Net annual P loss - 2,535 kg.
* Estimate based on 1,009 shoreline dwellings and two parks; see Working
Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries {non-point load) -
S. Fk., Miami River 92,485 35.4
N. Fk., Miami River 64,715 24.8
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 66,225 25.4
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 10,825 4.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 26,795 10.3
Total 261,045 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Miami River 195,610
3. Net annual N accumulation - 65,435 kg.
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
S. Fk., Miami River 20 714
N. Fk., Miami River 34 1,257
* Estimate based on 1,009 shoreline dwellings and two parks; see Working
Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is one
at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or remain
eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which would result
in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
grams/m2/yr
Total
0.28
Accumulated
loss*
Total
10.5
Accumulated
2.6
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Indian Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.34
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.17
* There was an apparent loss of phosphorus during the sampling year. This
may have been due to underestimation of the phosphorus loads from shore-
line septic tanks, phosphorus release from the sediments during dredging,
or both.
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes in
the United States, EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser., Proj.
#16010 EHR, Washington, DC.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Youger, John, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry;
review of preliminary report). OH Env. Prot, Agency, Columbus.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
CAKE
COOE LAKE NAME
3901 BEACH CITY RESERVOIR
3903 BUCKEYE LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL RESERVOIR
3906 DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
3907 DELAWARE RESERVOIR
3908 01LLION RESERVOIR
3912 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESERVOIR
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO CREEK RESERVOIR
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAKE
3927 LAKE SAINT MARYS
3928 ATWOOD RESERVOIR
3929 BERLIN RESERVOIR
3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
3931 O'SMAUGNESSY
3932 ROCKY FORK LAKE
3933 SHAKNEE LAKE
3934 TAPPAN LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.122
0.179
0.127
0.098
0.086
0.163
0.113
0.040
0*120
0.185
0.058
0*036
0.143
0.031
0.042
0.125
0.208
0.067
0.069
0.049
MEDIAN
INOhtG N
1.990
0.380
0.465
2.980
2.340
1.590
0.570
1.640
0.380
1.380
0.150
0.455
0.200
0.205
0.900
0.575
3.070
0.790
2.380
0.280
500-
MEAN SEC
489.000
490.000
482.555
470.125
404.111
481.250
486.333
462.750
485.222
494.000
465.333
456.833
484.167
462.000
465. 4J5
465.333
479.333
473.000
474.333
466.111
MEAN
CHLOHA
10.867
186.567
67.144
9. 887
10.856
27.400
40.533
13.017
76.855
104.100
36.267
22.850
79. ISO
16.442
15.496
55.350
5.522
38.022
39.567
37.711
15-
MIN 00
11.600
9.600
15.000
13.900
14.500
14.300
12.200
14.800
14.200
8.200
11.600
14.700
8.200
14.700
13.600
15.000
14.900
15.000
15.000
15.000
MEDIAN
OISS ORTHO P
O.Olb
0.020
0.011
0.036
0.024
0.037
0.019
0.008
0.012
0.019
0.006
0.010
0.014
0.005
0.006
0.034
0.159
0.010
0.009
0.007
-------
PERCENT OF LA*ES WITH H
LAKE
CODE LAKE MAME
VALUES (NUMflEH
LARES *tM HIGHER VALUES)
3401 BEACH CITr H
3902 8UCKEYE LAKE
3905 CHARLES MILL SESEHVOIR
390t> QEE« CREEK HESEHVOIW
3907 DELAWARE »E5ErfvOIH
3908 01LLION RESERVOIH
3912 GRANT LAKE
3914 HOOVER RESERVOI*
3915 INDIAN LAKE
3917 LORAMIE LAKE
3921 MOSQUITO CREEK HESEHVOIW
3924 PLEASANT HILL LAK.E
3927 LAKE SAINT MAKYS
392H ATrfooo RESERVOIR
3929 bEULIN RESERVOIR
3930 HOLIDAY LAKE
3^31 0(SHAUGNESST KtStKVOIR
3932 ROCKY FORK LAKE
3933 5HAWNEE LAKE
3=iJ4 fAPPAN LAr,E
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
37 <
11 (
26 <
S3 (
58 <
16 (
47 (
87 (
42 (
5 (
74 <
95 (
21 (
100 (
79 (
32 (
0 (
68 (
63 (
87 (
7)
2)
5>
10)
11)
3)
9)
16)
8)
1)
14)
18)
4)
19)
15)
b)
0)
13)
12)
161
MEDIAN
INOHG N
21 (
76 (
63 (
5 (
16 <
32 (
58 (
26 <
76 <
37 <
100 (
68 (
95 <
B9 (
42 <
S3 (
0 (
47 (
11 (
rt4 (
4)
14)
12)
11
3)
6)
11)
5)
14)
7)
19)
13)
18)
17)
a>
10)
0)
9)
2)
16)
SCO-
MEAN SEC
11 (
S (
37 <
63 <
J2 <
42 (
16 (
89 (
21 (
0 <
62 (
100 (
26 (
95 (
74 (
82 (
47 (
5B (
S3 (
68 (
2)
1)
7)
12)
6)
8)
3)
17)
4)
0)
15)
19)
5)
Id)
14)
15)
9>
11)
10)
U)
MEAN
CrtLOHA
84 (
0 (
21 (
95 (
89 (
58 (
32 <
79 (
16 (
S (
53 (
63 (
11 (
68 (
74 (
26 <
100 (
42 (
37 I
47 (
16)
0)
4)
18)
17)
11)
6)
15)
3)
1)
10)
12)
2)
13)
14)
5)
19)
8)
7)
9)
15-
MIN DO
82 (
89 (
11 (
63 (
47 (
53 (
74 (
32 (
58 (
97 {
82 (
39 (
97 I
39 (
68 (
11 (
26 <
11 (
11 (
11 (
15)
17)
0)
12)
9)
10)
14)
6)
ID
18)
IS)
7>
18)
7)
13)
0)
5)
0)
0)
0)
MEDIAN
OlSii ORTrlO P
42 <
26 (
58 (
11 I
21 (
5 <
34 <
79 <
53 (
34 (
92 (
66 (
47 (
100 (
92 (
16 (
0 (
66 (
74 (
84 (
8)
5)
11)
2>
4)
1)
6)
IS)
10)
6)
17)
12)
9)
19)
17)
3)
0)
12)
14)
Ito)
INOE
NO
277
207
216
290
263
206
2b)
392
266
178
48J
431
297
491
429
220
173
292
249
381
-------
* INUE*
LAKE CODE LAKL NAME
5 3-ai*
6 3^T*
7 3927
8 3*32
9 330b
10 3901
11 391S
\2 3^07
13 3-*12
14 3^33
15 3930
16 3*05
17 3902
18 390H
19 3917
20 3931
MOiUUlTO
PLEASANT MILL LAKE
nOOVER kESE-^OIft
TAPPAN LA-^t
LAKt SAINT MAHYS
HOC*,* FOKH LAKE
OEEft Cf*E£
BEACH CITiT rttSERVOIR
INDIAN LAnt
DELAWARE RESERVOIR
GRANT LAKE
SHA*N£E LAKL
MOLIDAr LAKE
CHArtLLS MILL RESERVOIR
HUCK£YE LAKL
UILLIUN REStKVOm
LORAHIE LAKE
0»ir)AUGNESSr RESEHVOlH
<»3J
392
381
2«>7
277
?6b
263
261
207
206
178
173
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 - Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR OHIO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 3915
INU1AN LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AHtA OF LAKE(SO KM)
SUB-OKAINAOL
TRIBUTARY AREAISQ KMI JAN
FEB
258.5
MAH
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
0EC
MEAN
3915A1
391SC1
391bL)l
3915Z/?
189,5
256.5
51.5
77.4
1.7s 2.U4 3.H £.52
3.51 ^. 13 6.29 5.07
0.6« 0.82 1.27 1,02
l.OB 1.27 1.90 1.53
1.47
2.97
0.59
0.91
0.88
1.73
0.34
0.51
0
1
0
0
.5*
.03
.21
.31
0.24
0.48
0.09
0.15
o.ia
0.37
0.07
0.11
0
0
0
0
.25
.48
.09
.14
0.4B
0.96
0.16
0.28
0.99
2.01
0.40
0.62
1.20
2.41
0.48
0.73
SUMMARY
OTAL DHAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
.UM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
2SS.5
258.5
TOTAL FLO*
TOTAL FLOW
IN =
OUT =
29.06
29.08
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOI»S
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAH MEAN FLOW DAY
391SA1
3915C1
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
it
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7i
74
74
74
74
2.12
1.47
1,53
2.29
0.24
0.62
1.19
1.59
3.82
2.15
1.93
2.46
3.48
1.73
2.07
4,70
0.01
0.62
2.15
2.61
7.39
s.ao
2.75
5.13
5
9
14
2a
15
20
10
16
12
9
2
6
S
9
14
28
15
20
10
16
12
9
2
6
FLOW DAY
1.50
0.62
U.96
0.24
O.S1
0.51
0.85
0.91
l.dl
2.24
3.74
6.54
6.26
0.48
0.20
U.O
0.02
£.55
0.0
0.01
0.0
O.Ul
19. 62
KLOW DAY
FLO*
1.73
15
1.42
4.25
15
4.25
-------
TRIdUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR OHIO
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 3915
INDIAN
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY
391SDI
3915^2
MONTH
VEAR
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
t*
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
?•+
7<+
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7 4
74
74
74
HEAN FLOW DAY
O.B5
0.57
0.59
0.88
0.01
0.23
0.45
0.62
1.47
0.88
0. f9
0.99
1.30
U.B5
0.91
1.05
0.03
o. n
0.99
1.67
0.99
0.85
1.08
5
9
14
28
15
2u
10
16
12
9
2
6
KLJW DAY
0.57
0.24
0.37
0.0
0.0
0.19
0.0
0.34
0.7t
0.91
1.50
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.71
Ib
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
391501
40 28 14.0 083 52 35.0
INDIAN LAKE
39091 OHIO
DATE
FROM
ro
73/05/04
73/08/02
73/10/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
OAV FEET
14 00 0000
14 00 0004
13 20 0000
13 20 0005
10 50 0000
U0010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
11.9
11.9
23.8
23.4
16. 6
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVr
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
11.2
9.1
2.4
18
18
12
480
480
3Bfr
390
337
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.60
8.60
8.90
8.70
8.20
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
165
168
136
137
126
2111202
0006
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.060
0.120
0.150
0.100
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.900
1.100
2.600
2.400
2.600
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.990
0.990
0.310
0.380
0.080
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.008
0.006
0.012
0.012
0.036
0066b 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FKOM OF ft
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/05/04 14 00 0000 0.057 48.7
14 00 U004 0.061
73/08/02 13 20 0000 0.142 107.0
13 20 0005 0.130
73/10/11 10 50 0000 0.157 73.3
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
391b02
40 30 28.0 083 52 05.0
INDIAN LAKE
39091 OHIO
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/04
73/08/02
73/10/11
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 25 0000
14 25 0003
12 45 0000
12 45 0003
11 10 0000
00010
MATER
TEMP
CENT
12.0
12.0
23.8
23.8
19.8
00665
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
FROM OF
TO (JAY FEET MG/L P
73/05/04 14 25 0000 U.046
14 25 0003 0.063
73/08/02 12 45 0000 U.146
12 4S 0003 0.164
73/10/11 11 10 0000 0.133
00300 00077 00094
00 THANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICHOMHO
10.9
8.5
8.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
59.3
114.2
76,2
9
17
12
420
420
359
357
310
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.60
8.60
8.70
8.60
8.90
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
142
152
124
123
113
2111202
0005
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.070
0.140
0.150
0.100
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.100
1.000
2.900
2.800
2.000
00630
N021N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.710
0.740
0.240
0.210
0.070
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.006
0.004
0.019
0.025
0.040
-------
STUKET
DATE
341503
4J 29 17.0 083 55 OS.
1NUIAN LAKE
39091 OHIO
DATE
TO
73/i)b/0<*
7 j/ud/02
73/10/U
TIME DtPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14
It
13
13
11
11
11
50
50
00
00
30
30
3C
OO'JO
0004
0000
0004
OUOU
0005
0010
tu
TEMP
CENT
12.5
12.5
24.1
23.9
2U.3
19.5
18.6
00300 Ou077 00094
DO TrtANSP CNOOCTVY
btCCHI F1ELO
MG/L INCHES MICKOMHO
10.6
4.2
0.8
410
400
359
12
295
304
313
11EPALES
3
Ou4UO
PH
SU
8. 7o
8.60
8.70
8,70
9.00
tt.ld
7.70
ootio
T ALK
CACOJ
Mb/L
150
149
123
123
101
109
lib
2111202
0007
0061U
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.110
0.090
0.12U
0.140
0.180
0.090
O.UO
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
1.000
2.700
2.300
1.800
1.600
1.700
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.670
0.660
O.ltO
0.190
0.070
0.060
0.060
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTMO
MG/L P
0.0d3
0.004
b.009
0.012
0.051
0.028
0.033
OAFE
FKUM
TO
73/05/04
73/utt/O/?
73/10/1 1
TIME DEPTH
o^
DAY FEET
14 50 0000
It 50 0004
13 00 0000
13 00 UOU**
11 30 OOuO
11 30 OOOb
11 30 ouiu
J(j665
HriU5-TOr
MG/L P
0.049
0.0 -)H
0 .07b
o. 1 IH
o . 129
u.124
o. 13d
32217
ChLRPriYL
A
Ut/L
S3.b
94.8
bn. 7
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL DATL 75/02/J3
40 28 28.0 083 SO 25.0
b FORK MIAMI P,IVER
39341 7.5 HUNTSVILLE
I/INDIAN LAKE
2ND^Y HO BKOG 1 MI UPSTREAM OF LAKE
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TU
73/U5/OS
7j/0t>/09
73/U7/14
73/08/2H
73/09/15
73/10/20
73/11/10
73/12/16
74/02/09
74/03/0,?
74/U3/09
74/03/lb
74/04/Ob
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02t.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
13
11
17
09
14
10
0V
14
12
15
13
11
20
US
00
33
25
35
00
40
35
30
30
40
20
MG/L
1.
2.
1.
0.
u*
0.
0.
2.
1.
2.
0.
2.
2.
660
500
1<*G
bbO
740
170
440
100
92y
940
610
3715
2UO
MG/L
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
100
bOO
540
560
000
800
650
700
300
700
BOO
700
900
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-UIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OrtTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
.029
.126
.090
.042
.086
.066
.046
.042
.050
.020
.025
.125
.067
MG/L P
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Oil
046
022
026
026
020
016
018
020
015
Olb
06U
037
MG/L P
0.030
0.105
0.040
0.045
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.025
0.080
0.070
0.235
0.120
-------
STUKET KEFWIEVAL UATt 7b/02/u3
tO 27 50.0 08J 51 26.0
CHtROl\EE HANS «UN
39 7.5 HUNTSVILLE
F/IN01AN LAKE
2NOKy «U BNUG BTrtN Ub HWY 33
11EPALES 211120
-------
STOrfET *ETKIEVAL DATE 75/02/10
3915D1
**0 31 25.0 033 4B 00.0
N FUKK MIAMI HjVER
39 7.5 ROUND HEAD
I/INDIAN LAKE
UONN KLI riWOG 0.8 Ml NNw OF ST HWY 273JCT
11EPALES 2111204
** 0000 TtET OEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/0^/05
73/06/09
73/U7/14
73/08/28
74/02/09
74/03/02
74/03/09
7W03/15
74/04/06
1 1ME DEPTH
OF
uAir
08
12
10
17
14
12
15
13
11
FEET
SO
42
47
17
?0
IS
15
25
05
00630
N02&.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
3.800
5.500
2.4UO
0.410
3.300
1.76C
0.500
b.500
4.100
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.600
2.900
0.930
1.100
1.000
1.000
0.200
1.400
1.600
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.054
0.092
0.140
0.032
0.065
0.025
0.030
0.110
O.C60
00671
PrtOS-DIS
OHTrlO
MG/L P
0.017
0.080
0.032
0.031
0.035
0.040
0*02b
0.125
0.090
00665
PHOS-FOT
MG/L P
0.030
0.1 ?0
0.070
0.055
0.035
0.130
0.105
0.290
U. 160
------- |