U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER • CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&GPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
BELT7VILLE LAKE
CARBON COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No,
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
689
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Pennsylvania Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
ii
F 0_R E_ W.O iD_
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)]s water
quality criteria/standards review [§303{c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources for professional involvement and to
the Pennsylvania National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey.
Walter A. Lyon, Director of the Bureau of Water Quality
Management, Richard M. Boardman, Chief of the Division of Water
Quality, and James T. Ulanoski, Aquatic Biologist of the Division
of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Harry J. Mier, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Pennsylvania, and Project Officer Major Ronald E. Wickard, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Pennsylvania National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Beaver Run Reservoir
Beltzville
Blanchard Reservoir
Canadohta
Conneaut
Conewago (Pinchot)
Greenlane
Harveys
Indian
Naomi
Ontelaunee
Pocono
Pymatuning Reservoir
Shenango River Reservoir
Stillwater
Wallenpaupack
COUNTY
McKean, Warren, PA;
Cattarugus, NY
Westmoreland
Carbon
Centre
Crawford
Crawford
York
Montgomery
Luzerne
Somerset
Monroe
Berks
Monroe
Crawford, PA;
Ashtabula, OH
Mercer
Monroe
Pike, Wayne
-------
BELTZVILLE LAKE
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
}0 Drainage Area Boundary
H Land Subject to Inundation
JKm.
Scale,
iMi.
-------
BELTZVILLE LAKE*
STORE! NO. 4220
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Beltzville Lake is mesotrophic.
Beltzville Lake ranked second in overall trophic quality when
the 17 Pennsylvania lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using
a combination of six lake parameters**. Two of the lakes had
less median total phosphorus, one had less and three had the
same median dissolved phosphorus, 11 had less median inorganic
nitrogen, none had less mean chlorophyll a_, and only one had
greater mean Secchl disc transparency. Marked depression of
dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at stations 1 and 2 in
July and October, 1973.
Survey limnologists did not observe any algal concentrations
or rooted aquatic vegetation during their visits and commented
on the attractive appearance of the lake.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that primary productivity
in Beltzville Lake was phosphorus limited at the time the sample
was taken (04/17/73). The lake data indicate phosphorus limi-
tation at the other sampling times as well.
* Table of metric conversions—Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—There were no known point sources
impacting Beltzville Lake during the sampling year. The
present loading rate of 0.55 g/m2/yr is essentially the same
as that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as an oligotrophic rate (see page 12). If this low
phosphorus loading rate can be maintained, the existing
excellent water quality of Beltzville Lake should persist.
2. Non-point sources—The mean annual phosphorus loads
from the two gaged tributaries amounted to 77.4% of the total
load reaching the lake. The estimated phosphorus load from
the ungaged drainage areas amounted to 19.5% of the total load.
The phosphorus export rates of the two gaged tributaries
(see page 12) were comparable to the rates of unimpacted
Pennsylvania tributaries surveyed elsewhere; e.g., Wagner
Run (14 kg P/km2/yr) and Upper Tunkhannock Creek {10 kg P/
km2/yr), tributaries of nearby Pocono Lake*.
* Working Paper No. 424.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
f
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 3.83 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 12.8 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >36.9 meters.
4. Volume: 49.024 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 138 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Pohopoco Creek 129.2 2.7
Pine Run 19.0 0.5
Wild Creek 60.3 0.0
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 37.4 0.6
Total 245.9 3.8
2. Outlet -
Pohopoco Creek 249.7** 4.1
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 144.1 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 120.7 centimeters.
t Ulanoski, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Beltzville Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
three stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6
m to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton
identification and enumeration; and during the first visit, a single
18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also
each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the sta-
tions for chlorophyll a. analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 36.9
meters at station 1, 22.9 meters at station 2, and 12.8 meters at station
3.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL ANO CHEMICAL
STOrtET CODE 4220
FOK 6ELTZV1LLE DAM
PArtAMETE*
TEMP (0
DISS UK* (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCHOMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (M()/L>
TOT f (MG/Lt
GwTMO P (Md/L(
N02*N03 (MG/L1
AMMONIA
KJEL N M(j/L)
INlfL A (UO/LI
StCCHl (METErtS)
1ST
WANGE
7.8 -
11.0 -
bO. -
7.0 -
10. -
O.UOM - 0
0.002 - 0
O.HOO - u
0.030 - 0
•J.200 - 0
O.«30 - 1
1.000 * 1
J.J -
3.U -
SAMPLING <
3
11.3
n. a
60.
7.6
14.
.014
.004
.990
.040
.500
.030
.3t>0
5.?
3.7
SITES
MEAN
9.1
11.5
54.
7.5
11.
0.010
0.005
O.B76
O.OJ4
0.2B7
0.91U
1.13.1
4.S
3.3
4/17/73)
HtDlAN
8.4
11. i
5b.
7.i
10.
0.010
».60^
O.U60
0.030
0.20U
U.H9U
1.1-40
b.l
3.0
2ND SAMPLING (
H
8.4
1.3
32.
6.0
lu.
O.OOH
0.0(j2
0.400
0.060
0.200
0.4t>0
0.600
s.r
2.7
3
- 26.2
8.M
- 41.
a. 4
10.
- 0.021
- 0.010
- 0.850
- 0.340
- 0.500
- U.940
- 1.150
- tt.4
3.4
SITES
MEAN
20.1
6.0
39.
6.6
10.
0.012
0.005
O.S6U
0.116
0.293
0.684
o.eoi
6.tt
2.9
7/24/73)
MEDIAN
2U.5
b.9
40.
6.J
10.
0.012
0.004
0.620
0.090
0.300
0.740
O.ctdO
6.2
2.1
3ttU SAMPLING (10/
MANbt
11.9 -
0.4 -
42. -
6.0 -
10. -
0.009 - 0
0.004 - 0
0.040 - G
0.050 - 0
0.200 - 0
0.510 - 0
0.720 - 1
2.8 -
4.0 -
J
IV. 2
H.O
54.
6.r
24.
.027
.012
.800
.470
.800
.910
.280
3.5
4.6
SITES
HE AM
17. S
5.1
46.
6.3
13.
0.012
0.006
0.523
0.120
0.425
0.64J
0.948
3.3
4.J
4/731
MEDIAN
IB. 5
6.2
44.
6.2
13.
0.010
0.006
O.Siib
O.OBO
0.400
0.615
0.9bU
3.5
4.3
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton* -
Sampling
Date
07/24/73
10/04/73
2. Chlorophyll a^ -
Sampling
Date
04/17/73
07/24/73
10/04/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Tabellaria
Asterionella
Gloeocystis
Cryptomonas
Melosira
Other genera
Total
Cyclotella
Dinobryon
Flagellates
Crucigeria
Algal units
per ml
1,115
678
241
153
131
197
2,515
618
598
159
20
Total
Station
Number
01
02
03
01
02
03
01
02
03
1,395
Chlorophyll a_
(yg/1)
5.1
5.2
3.3
8.4
6.2
5.7
2.8
3.5
3.5
* The April sample was lost in shipment.
-------
0.012
0.062
0.062
0.012
0.826
0.826
1.826
1.826
0.1
15.1
16.4
0.1
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mq/1) Cone, (rng/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-drv wt.)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Beltzville Lake was low at the time the assay sample was
collected (04/17/73). The significant increase in yield
(compared to the control) with the addition of orthophos-
phorus and the lack of change in yield when only nitrogen
was added indicate phosphorus limitation.
The lake data also indicate phosphorus limitation; i.e.,
the mean N/P ratios were 107/1 or greater, and phosphorus
limitation would be expected.
-------
8
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Pennsylvania
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff months of February and March when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Pennsylvania District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads
at station B-l, in kg/km2/year, and multiplying by the II area in km2.
The flow in Wild Creek {station C-l) is controlled by releases
from the Penn Forest and Wild Creek reservoirs which primarily are used
for municipal water supplies. The flow in Wild Creek below these
See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
reservoirs largely is seepage and ground-water recharge and generally
measures less than 0.01 m3/day. Therefore, loading estimates were not
prepared for station C-l; however, the results of the analyses of Wild
Creek samples are included in Appendix E.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
-------
10
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source ^r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Pohopoco Creek 1,420 67.4
Pine Run 210 10.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 410 19.5
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks - Unknown
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 65 3.1
Total 2,105 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Pohopoco Creek 1,490
3. Net annual P accumulation - 615 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
n
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Pohopoco Creek 115,615 75.9
Pine Run 10,985 7.2
b. Minor tributaries & irmiediate
drainage (non-point load) - 21,615 14.2
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks - Unknown
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 4,135 2.7
Total 152,350 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Pohopoco Creek 129,130
3. Net annual N accumulation - 22,220 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Pohopoco Creek 11 895
Pine Run 11 578
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.55 0.16 39.8 5.8
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Beltzville Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 1.12
"Permissible" {oligotrophic rate) 0.56
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Ulanoski, James, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry),
PA Dept. Env. Resources, Harrisburg.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 - square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS*
WANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 4224
2 4220
3 4222
4 4228
5 4227
6 4223
7 3641
8 4229
9 4221
10 4219
11 4204
12 4226
13 4213
14 4216
15 4225
16 4201
17 4207
LAKE NAOMI
8ELTZVILLE DAM
HARVEY'S LAKE
STILLWATER LAKE
POCONO LAKE
INDIAN LAKE
ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
CANADOHTA LAKE
BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
CONNEAUT LAKE
PINCHOT LAKE
PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
ONTELAUNEE DAM
BLANCHARO RESERVOIR
GREENLANE DAM
INDEX NO
445
423
413
401
389
388
335
371
369
360
307
256
206
157
101
85
53
-------
OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES
( 7)
( 1)
( 0)
< 3)
( 15)
( 14)
( 6)
( 10)
< 16)
< 13)
( 4>
( 5>
( 6)
( in
< in
MEDIAN
INOHG N
38
13
63
6
72
44
19
25
97
81
31
88
0
S6
97
72
SO
( 6)
( 2)
( 10)
( 1)
( in
( 7)
( 3>
1 4)
( 15)
( 13)
( 5)
( 14)
( 0)
( 9)
( 15)
( 11)
( 8)
500-
MEAN SEC
63 (
25 (
69 (
19 <
6 (
13 (
88 (
94 (
S6 (
100 (
75 t
44 (
0 1
31 (
50 (
3tS (
HI <
10)
4)
11)
3>
n
2)
14}
15>
9)
16)
12)
7)
0)
5)
6)
6)
13)
MEAN
CHLOKA
100
31
56
13
0
6
til
94
19
63
75
69
44
38
88
25
50
1 16)
t 5)
( 9)
< 2>
( 0)
( 1)
( 13)
( 15)
( 3>
( 10)
( 12)
( 11)
( 7)
< 6>
( 14)
< 4)
< 8)
15-
MIN DO
69 t
3 (
34 (
3 (
100 (
47 <
19 (
34 (
59 (
47 (
19 (
as (
19 (
81 (
75 <
94 (
59 (
11)
0)
5)
0)
16)
7)
2)
5)
9)
7)
2)
14)
2)
13)
12)
15)
9)
MEDIAN
D1SS P
5^ (
0 (
41 (
6 (
23 (
28 <
59 {
88 (
8d (
59 t
88 t
75 (
13 <
iy t
41 (
100 (
59 (
3)
0)
6)
1)
4)
4)
8)
13)
13)
8)
13)
12)
2)
3)
6)
16)
8)
INDEX
NU
365
85
307
S3
206
157
360
423
369
413
388
445
• 101
2S6
3d9
401
371
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
4201 BLANCHARO RESERVOIR
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE
4207 GKEENLANE UAM
4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
4220 6ELTZVILLE DAM
4221 CANADOHTA LAKE
4222 HARVEY'S LAKE
4223 INDIAN LAKE
4224 LAKE NAOMI
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM
4226 PlNCriOT LAKE
4227 POCONO LAKE
4228 STILLWATER LAKE
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.016
0,064
0.023
0.066
0.070
0.058
0.009
0.010
0.020
0.015
0.008
0.014
0.040
0.027
0.024
0.015
0.015
MEDIAN
INO*G N
0.380
1.3QO
O.ibS
1.475
0.180
0.340
0.835
0.815
0.130
0.160
0.520
0.135
2.150
0.245
0.130
0.180
0.250
500-
MEAN SEC
414.250
453.143
402. COO
460.222
467,750
•463.555
334. H33
362,444
436.000
338.000
400.222
443.333
470.667
453.000
438.800
449.000
394.583
MEAN
CHLORA
3.700
15.187
7.567
24.011
56.333
26.800
5.183
4.856
19.167
5.967
5.211
5.533
11.783
13.950
4.980
18.233
9.617
15-
MIN DO
13.800
I4.yoo
14.600
14.900
7.700
14.500
14.HOO
14.600
14.100
14.500
14.800
8.000
14.800
11.500
13.200
7.900
14.100
MEDIAN
DISS P
0.006
0.046
0,007
0.020
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.006
O.OOb
0.005
0.011
o.ooa
0.007
0.004
0.006
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
FLUvJ
FUH
1/37/75
LA
7
M
V
lu
11
73
7j
/3
73
73
73
73
73
74
/t
74
7J
73
7J
n
f j
73
73
JAN
3.31
2.2d
0 ,t£
0.0
0.3f
.fta
5.27
3.2j
G.e>t>
0.0
O.S4
«HH
6.77
4.33
0.'-*6
U.O
0. M
APK MAY
6.2u 3.99
3.ts5) d.y
O.ts
3. ^4
3.06
2 . u 7
2. £9
7 . 7 0
t. n
3.9-4
4.i.S
b.t-.h
i y
16
1 f
21
lo
If)
13
1J
15
12
12
^
16
17
21
It.
13
13
Ib
12
12
S
12.4J
4.rt4
3.Sil
3.4U
b. /H
33.11
H.b6
z'.rt
1.47
2.1s
J.ll
4. JO
24M.6
TUTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOd OUT
DAf
(•LOW iJAY
FLOW
•J4.7J
0.0
-------
FLOW INFORMATION FOR PENNSYLVANIA
1/27/75
LAKE CODE
OHM
MEAN MUNlhLY FLOwb ANU UrtlLY FLO*S(CMS»
TRIBUTARY HONTri YLA* MLAN FLOW DAY
4220C1
5
H
f
8
9
10
11
12
1
£
3
it
%
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
s
Ib
7
8
10
11
12
1
~f
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
It
It
74
73
73
73
73
73
7j
73
73
It
It
It
It
73
73
7j
73
73
73
73
74
74
It
ft
0.9ft
(;.b5
0.62
0.28
0.4J
0.74
1.90
I.Ob
O.HS
0.96
1.30
1.4?
0.85
0.62
y .2ft
0 . uu
U.uO
0.1,3
l.rtn
0^7^
0.9J
1.4?
1.47
O.H3
1 .3f)
O.^n
u, 37
0 .fi?
ij .it)
1.M7
1 . J't
1.1 j
1 . Ju
1.73
16
1 7
21
la
16
13
13
IS
12
12
V
19
16
17
21
1H
16
13
13
12
12
Si
19
16
17
21
Id
Ito
13
13
IB
12
12
Ht
G.S1
0.2S
0.4J
1.42
0.62
(i.59
0.93
2.13
1.S3
O.IU
J. Jl
U.Jb
a.uo
O.ou
U.L-U
2.61
2.12
0.42
u .6 ?
J.31
DAt
FLO* UAY
FLOrt
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STUrtfT RETRIEVAL UATt 75/01/27
422001
40 51 05.0 U75 38 u6.0
tftLT/VlLLe. UAH
42025 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
rROM
TO
73/04/17
7J/07/24
73/10/04
TIME DEPTH 't
OF
(JAV FEET
15
15
15
15
IS
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
14
09
09
Ot
09
U9
09
09
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
05
05
05
05
05
05
<+0
40
40
40
tO
tO
40
0000
0006
0020
0035
0050
0065
0080
0095
0113
uOOO
0005
0020
0040
0080
0121
0000
0025
0035
0050
0070
0095
0115
OOvJlU
TtUP
CENT
8
8
8
8
u03JO
00
HG/L
•
*
•
•
6
2
0
0
1
1
1
1
.
.
11.
1
1
«
7.9 11.
7
7
7
25
2b
19
17
11
8
18
18
18
1 t
16
1<+
11
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
*
•
.
•
,
•
9
9
8
5
0
8
1
4
•4
a
7
b
2
t
5
9
1
1
11
1
1
8
5
4
5
1
7
6
-,
U
0
y
U
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
•
•
*
7
8
7
7
5
b
5
b
8
2
6
fa
3
ft
6
b
t
6
6
a
u03l)0 U0077 OOUV4
oo THIANSP CI^DUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
HG/L INCHES M1CHOMHO
144
11.7
11.8
11.7
11.7
11.5
11 .b
11.5
11. b
lob
8.8
5.2
4.6
5. fa
1.3
7. ft 168
6.6
5.6
U . t
0.6
U .6
U.d
58
55
53
S3
53
53
S3
53
53
35
41
40
35
32
36
43
43
44
45
4tJ
50
b4
11EPALES
3
00400 00410
HH r ALK
CAC03
SU
7.50
7.60
7.60
7.6o
7.60
7.60
7.6u
7.60
7.60
7.20
7.20
6.00
6.00
6.1U
6.1U
b. 7'j
b.3J
6.30
6.00
6.00
6. U
t>.2u
MG/L
10*
10K
10
11
12
14
14
11
10 K
10K
10*
10*
10*
luK
10K
15
13
13
14
14
20
24
2111202
0117 FELT DEPTH
00610 00625 00630 00671
NH3-N TOT KJEL .M02^NU3 PHOS-QIS
TOTAL N N-TOTAL UHTHO
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.03U
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.080
0.080
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.340
O.U6U
0.060
0.060
0.050
o.obo
0.280
U.470
M(i/L
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200K
0.200
0.300
0.200K
0.500
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.400
0.700
0.800
MG/L
0.870
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.860
0.870
0.860
0.860
0.850
0.440
0.420
0.620
0.650
0.680
0.540
0.480
0.490
0.520
0.680
0.610
0.270
0.040
MG/L P
0.007
0.003
0.005
0.008
0.005
0.005
0.007
0.004
0.007
O.OOS
0.010
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.006
O.OOS
0.004
O.OOt
0.005
0.006
0.006
K VALUE KNOl^N TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET HETKIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
UATE
FKOM
TO
73/04/17
00663
TIME OLPTH ^hUS-TOT
OF
UAY FEET M(3/L H
15
ib
73/07/24
73/lu/O^
15 40
40 0000
4i> 0006
HO 0020
40 0035
005o
is 40 0065
15 40 OOtiO
15 40 ijO^S
15 40 011J
in 05 0000
14 05 OOio
14 u5 0020
14 Ob 0040
14 05 L'08u
14 05 ul21
0-j 40
09 HO
y^ 40 OOJ5
04 **0 0050
O^ 40 0070
usy 40 OOSb
09 40 0115'
O.ulo
O.Ol'*
U.OOH
u.UlO
u.OOd
O.OiO
u. 0 0 e
0.011
o.OlJ
0.012
0.010
o.oo a
0.012
J.Oll
o.oo^
J • 0 0 4
-------
SfOHtT HETKIEVAL DATE 7b/01/27
422002
40 52 10.0 075 35 57.0
UELf^VILLE OftM
42025 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
TU
73/04/17
73/07/24
73/10/04
uOOlO
TIME DEPTH WAIEH
OF TEMP
UAV FEET CENT
16 25 0000 9.8
16 ?5 0006 9. I
16
16
16
16
16
14
It
14
14
14
10
10
10
10
10
10
2b
?5
25
?5
25
55
S5
55
55
55
JO
30
30
30
30
30
U015
0025
U035
0050
0067
0000
U005
0020
u040
ou71
0000
U025
0035
0040
0055
0075
9
y
9
8
6
26
25
20
17
12
1 9
19
Itt
17
17
16
.6
.5
.2
.5
.2
.2
.2
.5
.0
.4
.2
.0
.^
.7
.a
. l
00390
UO
MG/L
11. B
11
1 1
11
11
11
H
fa
<*
3
6
7
fa
6
b
4
.6
.6
.7
.3
.2
.a
.2
.4
.2
.U
.4
.2
. J
.2
.6
001)94
THANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES
120
132
lac
55
55
55
55
52
50K
41
37
44
44
44
45
46
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
bU
7.40
7.50
7.40
7.50
7.40
7.50
7.50
7.40
7.1U
6.20
6.0u
to. Go
6.5U
6.30
6.2U
6.20
6.1 J
6.2j
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
IOK
IOK
IOK
IOK
IOK
IOK
IOK
IOK
IOK
1UK
IOK
13
14
10
IOK
lUK
12
2111202
0071
OOblO
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
J.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.0 70
0.090
0.100
0.130
0.180
0.060
0.050
0.120
J.090
0.110
U.l/U
FttT DEPTH
0062S
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
0.20 OK
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.600
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.300
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
Mb/L
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.800
0.850
0.410
0.420
0.710
0.720
0.630
0.470
0.490
0.590
0.670
0.800
0.650
00671
PHOS-OIS
OtfTHO
MG/L P
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.004
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.012
0.007
0.009
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOPtT RETRIEVAL UAU1 75/ul/«
u •
0.
U.
L t
0.
'J •
0.
LI .
L.
0.
A
^ JU/L
Oil b.2
00^
Oud
OOa
Oo9
Oo'v
Olo'
o lo r>.2
012
Oil
Oil
010 3.b
Oiu
Oil
0?0
017
oov
+221,02
32 10
0 07b 35 b/.O
OAi"
0071 Fttf DEPTH
-------
KEIrtiFVAL KATt 7-5/&1/27
4u si; 35.0 075 3** 00.0
bELT^V
4208V
OAft fI«E DtH'TH HATER
FrfUM OF TtMP
TO UAY FEET CtNT
003uO
DO
7J/0<*/)7
73/07/24
7 j/ I0/0t
16
16
16
Ib
Ib
15
15
IS
Ib
11
11
11
55
•=,$
S5
55
Sb
25
25
?5
25
15
Ib
IS
0000
0006
0015
002b
0042
0000
OOJ^ •
^020
U03b
uOOO
U020
uJ2b
11.
11.
10.
10.
10.
£b.
26.
2?.
18.
ly.
19.
1M.
3
1
4
5
J
2
2
b
^
1
U
7
11
11
11
11
H
B
7
7
t)
7
.5
.4
.2
.0
.b
.2
.*.
.4
* **
* P
Uou77
MG/L INCHES
00094
NOUCT
FltLU
Ibd
bO
5H
55
55
b5
41
41
41
41
42
44
43
lltPALtS
J
0040U
t^M
bU
7.00
7.4g
7.3l>
7.30
/.40
tt.4o
7.00
fa.ij
b.30
6.4;i
6.3u
6.30
0041U
T rtLK
C4C03
MG/L
10K
1UK
1UK
10K
1UK
10*
UK
10r\
10K
11
11
11
12111202
0046
00610
MMJ-M
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
U.03U
0.030
0.030
u.oao
0.060
o.oeo
0.090
0.100
o.uso
O.UcsO
FEET OEf>TM
oao2b
IOT KJEL
N
HG/L
0.200
U.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.200
o.aoo
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
U.990
0.920
O.V20
0.940
0.980
U.41U
0.40U
0.620
0.650
O.S30
O.b20
O.B60
00671
PrtOb-OIS
UMfHU
MG/L P
0.004
0.004
O.OOb
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.004
O.U05
O.OOS
0.006
0.007
0.006
3?217
OAft
TIME OtPfrl PnuS-TOT
OF
Tu OAf FEET H(J/L H
7J/J4/17
7j/lU/Ot
uOOO
OOOb
iJOlS
a
u
n
ss
?5
25
15
UJ<»?
oooj
u03t>
OJliO
u020
0.01 i
0.011
...Oil
u .u!2
.'.01 1
0.014
J.021
J.uiu
A
UG/L
j.3
3.b
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STOHdT RETRIEVAL OATt 75/02/03
422UA1
40 SO 55.0 075 3fa 30.0
POhOPOCO CHEEK
42129 7.5 LtHIGHTOtM
0/ttELTZVlLLE DAM
EiMI) OF OLD HILL KD ttELO LJAM SPILLWAY
11EPALES 2111204
4 UOOO FEET DEPTH
UATt
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/26
7V07/07
73/OU/14
73/U9/1B
73/10/16
73/11/25
74/01/05
7^/02/03
7W02/17
74/03/03
74/U3/U
7W04/21
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH ••j02t.N03 TOT KJEL
OF M-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
IB
19
20
19
21
07
14
13
13
10
14
11
14
51
45
07
30
40
10
05
30
45
25
00
O
00
MG/L
0.
0.
•J.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
730
630
610
630
580
550
583
63i>
7cJO
756
8bu
830
630
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
350
560
730
150
390
250
800
100K
300
200
100
300
00610 00671 OU66i
NH3-N " PHOS-UIS PhOS-TOT
TOTAL OrtTHO
MG/L
0.011
0.054
0.096
0.048
0.038
0.073
0.068
O.U2U
0.020
0.045
0.030
0.020
0.035
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
f
005K
006
005K
005K
009
008
005K
010
OOb
OlU
010
005
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
u
.005K
.Oil)
.010
.U10
.010
.U05
.015
.010
.015
.010
.015
.015
K VALUE KNO*N TO BE
LtSS THAN INDICATED
-------
bTOREF RETW1EVAL DATE 7S/02/U3
50 53 10.0 075 32 20.0
POnOPOCO CREEK
42 7.5 POHOPOCO MTN
T/bELTZVlLLE UAM
uiNiDHV KO 13015
lltPALES 2H12U4
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FrtOM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/26
73/07/07
73/0«/l4
73/09/18
73/10/16
73/ll/2b
74/01/05
74/02/03
74/02/17
74/03/03
74/03/17
H*/\)*/2\
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
17
21
21
14
22
Ot)
15
14
14
11
14
12
15
15
00
00 '
00
30
00
10
45
30
20
55
22
00
00630 00625
NU2iN03 TOT KJEL
N-TOTAL N
MG/L MG/L
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
730
95y
960
000
790
040
120
120
200
2BO
260
lliu
010
0.
1.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
670
470
S?0
130
460
200
800
100K
200
100
100
500
200
00610 00671 006b5
NHJ-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL uRTHO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
022
044
029
022
036
017
032
008
010
015
020
022
015
0.005K
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
006
005K
007
009
OOSK
005K
OOSK
010
005
010
005
OOSK
0.010
0.020
J.010
0.02b
0.040
O.Olb
0.015
0.005
O.UlO
0.010
O.Olu
0.022
O.Olb
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOHEF KETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
40 b3 10.0 075 37 07.0
PINE KUN
42 7.5 PGHOPOCO MTN
T/BELTZVILLE UAM
it.C HO T<»41 rirtUG .8 MI FKOM MOUTH
11EPALES 2111204
^ 0000 FEtT DEPTH
DATE
FriOM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/26
73/07/17
73/Ort/U
73/04/ltt
73/1U/16
73/11/25
7^/01/05
7^/0^/03
74/02/17
74/03/03
74/03/17
74/0<+/2l
00630 00625
TIME OtPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FRET
17
20
20
20
22
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4220C1
40 t>3 28.0 075 33 44.0
KILU CREEK
42 7.5 POHOPOCO MTN
T/bELTZVlLLE UAM
b£C HO T435 BrJDG .3 MI BELu WILD CK DAM
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FLtT DEPTH
DATE
FHOM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/26
73/07/17
73/08/14
73/09/18
73/10/16
73/11/25
74/01/05
7WU2/03
74/02/17
74/03/03
74/03/17
7WU4/21
00630 00635
TIME DEPTH N02«»N03 TUT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
DAY FEET
IB
20
20
20
22
1)8
14
14
14
11
14
12
14
08
45
4S
20
IS
30
40
15
20
00
30
15
45
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
a
0
0
0
.016
.060
.ObO
.02tt
.064
.OdO
. OdO
.084
.072
.040
MG/L
0.
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
J.
0.
0.
0.
0*
t40
100
900
100K
400
150
300
JOOK
500
100(\
100
100
200
OOblO 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OHTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
024
03*
100
019
023
016
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
a.
p
OOSK
009
005K
007
017
005K
MG/L P
u.010
0.020
0.010
0.007
0.02u
0.050
O.Olb
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
012
015
015
015
015
OOSK
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
005K
005
005
010
005K
005K
0.00-iK
0.005
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |