U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
CENTRE COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No,
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
&GPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
CENTRE COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 415
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1375
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Pennsylvania Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 10
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices 18
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)]» water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a.b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey {Office of
Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources for professional involvement and to
the Pennsylvania National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey.
Walter A. Lyon, Director of the Bureau of Water Quality
Management, Richard M. Boardman, Chief of the Division of Water
Quality, and James T. Ulanoski, Aquatic Biologist of the Division
of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Harry J. Mier, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Pennsylvania, and Project Officer Major Ronald E. Wickard, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Pennsylvania National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Beaver Run Reservoir
Beltzville
Blanchard Reservoir
Canadohta
Conneaut
Conewago (Pinchot)
Greenlane
Harveys
Indian
Naomi
Ontelaunee
Pocono
Pymatuning Reservoir
Shenango River Reservoir
Stillwater
Wallenpaupack
COUNTY
McKean, Warren, PA;
Cattarugus, NY
Westmoreland
Carbon
Centre
Crawford
Crawford
York
Montgomery
Luzerne
Somerset
Monroe
Berks
Monroe
Crawford, PA;
Ashtabula, OH
Mercer
Monroe
Pike, Wayne
-------
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
'X Lake Sampling Site
HJLand Subject To Inundation
o ; 2 jKm.
Scale
-------
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
0 Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
Land Subject To Inundation
o s 10 Km.
Scale
5 Mi.
41 00-
BLANCHARD
RESERVOIR
Map Location
4045-
-------
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR*
STORE! NO. 4201
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Blanchard Reservoir is eutrophic.
It ranked fifteenth in overall trophic quality when the 17
Pennsylvania lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using a
combination of six water quality parameters**. Fourteen of
the water bodies had less median total phosphorus and median
inorganic nitrogen, 12 had greater mean Secchi disc transparency,
and 11 had less mean chlorophyll a^ Marked depression of dis-
solved oxygen with depth occurred at station 1 in July and
October, 1973.
Survey limnologists noted a heavy and widespread algal
bloom at station 2 in October; this was the only nuisance
condition noted.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results show that Blanchard Reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the time the assay sample was collected
(04/13/73). The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at
the other sampling times as well.
* Table of metric conversions--Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
. 2.. .
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, Blanchard
Reservoir received a total phosphorus load at a rate nearly
seven times (see page 16) that proposed to produce a eutrophic
body of water (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974). However,
Vollenweider's model probably does not apply to water bodies
with short hydraulic retention times, and the mean hydraulic
retention time of Blanchard Reservoir is only 11 days. None-
theless, the existing trophic condition of the reservoir is
evidence of excessive nutrient loads.
It is calculated that the point sources considered in this
study contribute 96% of the total phosphorus load reaching the
reservoir (the waste treatment plants serving Pennsylvania State
University and the University Area Joint Authority collectively
contribute 80.5% of the total). Phosphorus removal at the 80%
level would reduce the present loading rate of 9.66 g/m2/yr to
2.25 g/m2/yr. While this rate would still exceed the eutrophic
rate of 1.40 g/m2/yr, in view of the questionable applicability
of Vollenweider's model to water bodies with short hydraulic
retention times, it is likely that 80% phosphorus removal would
result in a significant improvement in the trophic condition of
the reservoir.
-------
2. Non-point sources—The mean annual phosphorus load from
non-point sources was 4% of the total reaching the reservoir.
The gaged tributaries contributed a total of about 3.4% and
ranged from <0.1% in Bui lit Run to 3.1% in Bald Eagle Creek..
The ungaged tributaries were estimated to have contributed
approximately 0.4% of the total.
The phosphorus exports of the sampled streams were excep-
tionally low (see page 15) as compared to Pennsylvania streams
studied elsewhere.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 7.00 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 1.6 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >9.4 meters.
4. Volume: 11.431 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 11 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Bald Eagle Creek 686.3 10.3
Lick Run 32.1 0.2
Nittany Creek 51.8 0.1
Bull it Run 15.8 0.1
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 85.0 ..JL-j.
Totals 871.0 12.0
2. Outlet -
Bald Eagle Creek 878.0** 12.0**
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 92.9 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 96.8 centimeters.
t Ulanoski, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Blanchard Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
three stations on the lake (two in October) and from a number of depths
at each station (see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-
integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from
the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during
the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited
for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected
from each of the stations for chlorophyll _a analysis. The maximum depths
sampled were 9.4 meters at station 1, 5.2 meters at station 2, and 1.5
meters at station 3 (too shallow to sample in October).
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/13/73)
3 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 4201
2ND SAMPLING < 7/24/73)
3 SITES
3RD SAMPLING <10/ 2/7J)
2 SITES
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OJSS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
OrtTMU P (MG/L)
NU2*N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INOKG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLl^YL A (UG/L)
SECCHJ (METEPS)
RANGE
7.7
10.9
220.
7.0
75.
d. 062
0.0 SO
1.200
0.030
0.200
1.250
1.400
1.3
0.0
9.4
- 11.8
- 280.
8.0
91.
- 0.074
- 0.071
- 1.400
- 0.070
- 0.400
- 1.470
- 1.800
5.5
1.1
MEAN
8.6
11.3
24S.
7.T
84.
0.068
0,063
1.333
0.051
0.233
1.384
1.567
2.9
0.8
MEDIAN
8.2
11. J
248.
7.8
8B.
0.068
0.064
1.400
0.050
0.200
1.430
1.600
1.9
0.6
RANGE
19.0
0.1
266.
7.4
86.
0.032
0.009
0.500
0.060
0.600
0.580
1.110
6.3
1.3
- 26.5
- 13.1
- 355.
9.0
- 138.
- 0.156
- 0.105
- 2.100
- 0.280
- 1.200
- 2.220
- 2.700
- 12.0
i.a
MEAN
24.0
8.1
298.
8.4
104.
0.062
0.024
O.M33
0.134
0.780
0.967
1.613
10.3
1.5
MEDIAN
25.2
8.6
288.
8.6
95.
0.05S
0.012
0.590
0.120
0.700
0.715
1.480
10.7
1.5
MANGE
16.6
3.2
290.
7.1
134.
0.039
0.010
0.670
0.090
0.400
o.aoo
1.280
5.6
0.7
- 18.2
9.2
- 32fl.
S.I
- 153.
- 0.3S7
- 0.228
- 2.280
- 0.430
- 2.2QO
- 2.370
- 3.520
- 76.2
2.2
MEAN
17.6
6.9
308.
7.6
141.
0.152
0.079
1.194
0.210
0.960
1.404
2.154
40.9
1.4
MEDIAN
17.6
7.8
308.
7.5
141.
0.052
0.032
0.920
0.130
0.800
1.350
1.720
40.9
1.4
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/13/73
07/24/73
10/02/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Cryptomonas
2. Flagellates
3. Synedra
4. Fragilaria
5. Navicula
Other genera
Total
1. Oocystis
2. Coelastrum
3. Scenedesmus
4. Frag11 aria
5. Flagellates
Other genera
Total
1. Melosira
2. Fragilaria
3. Cryptomonas
4. Flagellates
5. Oocystis
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
212
112
75
62
49
40
550
9,074
424
346
26
26
19
60
Total
901
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a_
Date Number (yg/1)
04/13/73 01 5.5
02 1.9
03 1.3
07/24/73 01 8.3
02 10.7
03 12.0
10/02/73 01 5.6
02 76.2
03
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Blanchard Reservoir was quite high at the time the algal
assay sample was collected (04/13/73). The assay results
also indicate that phosphorus was growth-limiting at the time
of sample collection. There was no significant increase in
algal biomass yield with the addition of only nitrogen, but
0.044
0.094
0.094
0.044
1.054
1.054
2.054
2.054
10.0
24.6
21.2
9.9
-------
the addition of phosphorus increased the yield to more
than double that of the control.
The lake data also indicate phosphorus limitation. The
mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus ratios were 18 to
1 or greater at all sampling times, and thus phosphorus
limitation would be expected.
-------
10
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Pennsylvania
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the
high runoff months of February and March when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun 1n May, 1973, and was completed in April,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Pennsylvania District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
Except for station A-2, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. The phosphorus loading for
station A-2 on Bald Eagle Creek was less than the total phosphorus
loading from the point sources upstream. However, it was assumed that
all the phosphorus reached the water body during the sampling year, and
the following method was used to determine the annual background loading.
The nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, at stations B-l, C-l, and D-l were
averaged and the means were multiplied by the drainage area of A-2 in km2.
Otherwise, nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-source
loads, if any.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at stations B-1, C-l, and D-l and
multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km2.
The operators of the Bald Eagle (Wingate), Pennsylvania State
University, State Correctional Institute (S.C.I.) at Rockview,
University Area Joint Authority, and Pine Grove Mills wastewater
treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding
flow data. The Bellefonte Municipal Sewer Authority and Al Marr Acres
did not participate in the sampling program, and nutrient loads were
estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year. The loads for
the Port Matilda untreated wastes were estimated at 1.587 kg P and
4.263 kg N/capita/year, and the septic tank loads from Milesburg and
Unionville were estimated at 0.1134 kg P and 4.263 kg N/capita/year.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known munci pal
t
Name
Bald Eagle
(Wingate)
Penn. State
University
S.C.I, at
Rockview
Univ. Area
Jt. Auth.
Pine Grove
Mills
Belief on te
Municipal
Sewer Auth.
Port Matilda
Al Marr Acres
Miles burg
Unionville
Pop.
Served
2,000
40,000
700
30,000
1,200
7,000
700
140
1,196
375
Treatment
pond
trickling
filter
trickling
filter
tertiary
ext. aer.
act. sludge
none
pond
septic tanks
septic tanks
Mean Flow
(mVd)
62.3
11,196.1
467.9
9,978.9
102.5
2,649.5*
265.0*
53.0*
452.7*
141.9*
Receiving
Water
Bald Eagle
Creek
Spring Creek
Spring Creek
Spring Creek
Slab Cabin
Creek
Spring Creek
Bald Eagle Creek
Spring Creek
Bald Eagle Creek
Bald Eagle Creek
2. Known industrial - None
t Ulanoski, 1975.
* Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Bald Eagle Creek 2,060 3.1
Lick Run 165 0.2
Nittany Creek 100 0.1
Bullit Run 30 <0.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 255 0.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bald Eagle (Wingate) 70 0.1
Penn. State University 24,760 36.6
S.C.I, at Rockview 490 0.7
Univ. Area Jt. Auth. 29,710 43.9
Pine Grove Mills 420 0.6
Bel 1efonte Mun. Sewer Auth. 7,940 11.7
Port Matilda 1,110 1.6
Al Marr Acres 160 0.2
Milesburg 135 0.2
Unionville 45 <0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 60 0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 125 0.2
Total 67,635 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Bald Eagle Creek 35,745
3. Net annual P accumulation - 31,890 kg.
* Estimate based on 205 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Bald Eagle Creek 168,145 42.6
Lick Run 14,940 3.8
Nittany Creek 9,215 2.3
Bull it Run 1,455 0.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 20,825 5.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bald Eagle (Wingate) 120 <0.1
Penn. State University 68,955 17.5
S.C.I, at Rockview 2,560 0.6
Univ. Area Jt. Auth. 64,420 16.3
Pine Grove Mills 695 0.2
Bel 1efonte Mun. Sewer Auth. 23,805 6.0
Port Matilda 2,985 0.8
Al Marr Acres 475 0.1
Milesburg 5,100 1.3
Unionville 1,600 0.4
d. Septic tanks* - 2,185 0.5
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 7,555 1.9
Total 395,035 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Bald Eagle Creek 794,465
3. Net annual N loss - 399,430 kg.
* Estimate based on 205 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tri butary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Bald Eagle Creek (estimated) 3 245
Lick Run 5 465
Nittany Creek 2 178
Bullit Run 2 92
-------
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nvtrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 9.66 4.56 56.4 loss*
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Blanchard Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 1.40
"Permissible" {oligotrophic rate) 0.70
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This
may have been due to nitrogen fixation in the lake, solubilization of
previously sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water,
unknown and unsampled point sources discharging directly to the lake, or
underestimation of the nitrogen loads from point sources. Whatever the
cause, a similar nitrogen loss has occurred at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota,
which has been intensively studied by EPA's National Eutrophication and
Lake Restoration Branch.
-------
17
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Chief, Howard Fire Dept., 1975. Personal communication {Howard
STP outfall). Howard.
Ulanoskl, James, 1975. Personal conmunlcation (lake morphometry).
PA Dept. of Env. Resources, Harrisburg.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophlcatlon research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 4224
2 4220
3 4222
4 4228
5 4227
6 4223
7 3641
8 4229
9 4221
10 4219
11 4204
12 4226
13 4213
14 4216
15 4225
16 4201
17 4207
LAKE NAOMI
BELTZVILLE DAM
HARVEY»S LAKE
STILLWATER LAKE
POCONO LAKE
INDIAN LAKE
ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
CANADOHTA LAKE
BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
CONNEAUT LAKE
PINCHOT LAKE
PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
ONTELAUNEE DAM
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
GREENLANE DAM
INDEX NO
445
423
413
401
389
388
385
371
369
360
307
256
206
157
101
85
53
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHEK VALUES)
•LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
4201 BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE
4207 GREENLANE DAM
4213 PtMATUNING RESERVOIR
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
4220 BELTZVILLE DAM
4221 CANADOHTA LAKE
4222 HARVEY'S LAKE
4223 INDIAN LAKE
4224 LAKE. NAOMI
4225 ONTELAUNEE 0AM
4226 PINCHOT LAKE
4227 POCONO LAKE
4228 STILLWATEW LAKE
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
56 <
13 <
44 (
6 (
0 (
19 (
94 (
88 (
50 t
63 <
100 (
81 (
25 (
31 (
38 (
72 (
72 <
9) .
2)
7)
1)
0)
3)
IS)
14)
8)
10)
16)
13)
4)
5)
6)
H>
11)
MEDIAN
INORG N
38 (
13 <
63 (
6 (
72 t
44 (
1.9 (
25 (
97 (
81 (
31 <
88 (
0 t
56 (
97 <
72 <
50 (
6)
2)
10)
1)
11)
7)
3)
4)
15).
13)
5)
14)
0)
9)
IS)
11)
8).
500-
MEAN SEC
63 (
25 (
69 )
19 \
6 1
' 13 1
88 1
94 1
56 1
100 1
75 1
44 1
0 I
31 <
50 i
38 i
81 I
: io)
: 4j
: ID
: 3)
! 1)
: 2t
: 14)
!• IS)
I 9)
I 16)
t 12)
I 7)
I 0)
[ 5)
( 8)
I 6)
( 13)
MEAN
CHLORA
100 <
31 1
56 1
13 <
0 <
6 <
ai i
94 )
19 1
63 1
75 1
69 i
44
38
88
25
50
! 16)
[ 5)
I 9)
I 2>
I 0)
: i)
I 13)
1 >S)
1 3)
; io>
I 12)
t 11)
1 7)
( 6)
t 14)
1 4)
( 8)
15-
MIN DO
69 <
3 1
34 <
3 (
100 1
47 (
19 t
34 1
.59 1
47 1
19 1
88 1
19 <
81 i
75
94 i
59
ID
: o>
; si
; o>
; i6>
: , 7)
; 2)
: s>
: 9>
i 7)
I 2)
! 14)
I 2)
( 13)
( 12)
[ 15)
( 9)
MEDIAN
D1SS P
59 (
0 (
41 .(
6 (
28 (
23 (
59 <
88 <
8d (
59 (
88 (
75 (
13 <
. 19 <
41 1
100 1
59 1
8)
0)
6)
1)
4)
4)
B)
13)
13) .
8)
13)
i 12)
; 2)
1 3)
[ 6)
I 16)
[ 8)
INDEX
NO
385
85
307
53
206
157
360
423
369
413
388
445
101
256
3U9
401
371
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3641 ALLEGHENY (RESERVOIR
4201 BLANCHARO RESERVOIR
4204 CUNNEAUT LAKE
4307 GREENLANE DAM
4213 PYMATUNING RESEHVOIR
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
4230 8ELTZVILLE DAM
4231 CANADOHTA LAKE
4222 HARVEY'S LAKE
4223 INDIAN LAKE
4224 LAKE NAOMI
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM
4226 PINCHOT LAKE
4227 POCONO LAKE
4228 STILLWATER LAKE
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.016
0.064
0.023
0.066
0.070
0.068
0.009
0.010
0.020
0.015
0.003
0.014
0.040
0.027
0.024
0.015
0.015
MEUIAN
INOKG N
0.380
1.300
O.lttS
1.475
o.iao
0.340
0.835
0.815
0.130
0.160
0.520
0.135
2.150
0.245
0.130
0.180
0.250
500-
MEAN SEC
414.250
453.143
402.000
,460.222
467.750
463. b55
384.833
362.444
436.000
338.000
400.222
443.333.
470.667
453.000
438.800
449.000
394.583
MEAN
CHLORA
3.700
15.187
7.567
24.011
56.333
26.800
5.183
4.856
19.167
5.967
5.211
5.533
11.783
13.950
4.980
18.233
9.617
15-
MIN DO
13.800
14.^00
14.600
14.900
7.700
14.500
14.800
14.600
14,100
14.500
14.800
8.000
14.800
11.500
13.200
7.900
14.100
MEDIAN
DISS P
0.006
0.046
0.007
0.020
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.005.
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.011
0.008
0.007
0.004
0.006
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
FLO* II^FOKMATIUN FOH PENNSYLVANIA
1/27/75
LAKE COUt 4201
dLANCHAUD KEStRVOIH
TOTAL DRAINAGE A«tA OF LAKt
-------
Fuo« INFORMATION FUK
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 4,?u 1
dLANCHAHU
MEAN MONTHLY FLO*S AND DAIL* FLOwS(CMS»
MONlri YtAK MLAiM FLO* UAt
4201dl
420IC1
42(J UZ
s
6
7
M
9
10
11
13
1
2
3
it
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
S
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
i
3
4
5
6
7
H
<•
10
11
12
1
2
3
i.
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
fit
74
74
73
7J
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
7-*
74
74
73
/3
73
73
73
73
73
73
7t
ft
74
74
0.40
0.40
O.lb
o. 10
0.10
O.U9
0.09
0.34
0.41
U.2H
0.4li
U.S3
0.23
0.24
0.10
0.07
U.u/
0.07
0.06
0.21
0.26
O.ld
G.24
0.45
0.1?
0.12
O.oS
0.04
0.04
O.C3
0.03
J.ig
0. 14
0.09
0.12
0.22
2.07
I.b7
u.eb
0.6d
1 .u5
0.85
1.3^,
? .41
2.b2
I.SD
1.76
19
10
14
n
9
13
10
15
12
9
10
7
19
10
14
11
•y
13
10
15
12
9
10
7
19
Id
14
11
9
13
lu
is
12
9
10
7
19
10
14
11
9
13
10
IS
12
9
lo
fLOrt OAT
0.31
O.S9
0.14
U.14
0.09
J.OH
O.uB
U.22
u.24
u.?d
I.JO
1.59
0.19
0.34
0.09
U.U9
O.U6
0.06
O.Ob
0.1<»
U.lb
u.id
0,b5
0.7SI
0.1U
0.1«>
u.iii
0.05
U.U3
0.03
U.03
U.07
O.Utt
o.ov
0.31
a.j?
1.67
2.10
ti.U
O.bl
i./'J
1.13
l.JJ
2.U9
6.2U
FLU*
FLUW
-------
APPENDIX 0
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOrtET RETHIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
420101
41 02 44.0 077 36 35.0
BLANCriARO RESERVOIR
42027 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
FHOH
TO
73/04/13
73/07/24
73/10/02
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/13
73/U7/24
73/lu/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
13
13
00
00
00
00
15
15
15
15
IS
15
IS
35
35
35
0000
OOOB
0015
0031
0000
0005
0010
0016
0020
0025
0028
0000
(JO 10
0020
IIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 00 0000
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1J
13
13
00
00
00
15
IS
15
15
35
35
35
0008
0015
0031
0000
0010
0016
002B
0000
0010
J020
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
25.6
25.4
25.0
23.6
21.7
19.8
19.0
18.2
17.9
17.6
00665
PHUS-TOT
MG/L P
0.069
0.067
0.062
0.067
O.OJ2
0«0<*9
0.056
u.047
u.051
J.039
U.0b2
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
10.9
11.0
11.0
7.9
7.0
0.4
0.1
7.8
5.6
3.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
b.5
6.3
5.6
24 240
248
250
250
72 273
280
288
328
345
317
303
86 290
298
308
11EPALES 2111202
3 0035 FEET DEPTH
00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 »0671
PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02iN03 PHOS-DIS
CAC03 TOTAL N " N-TOTAL Oft T NO
SU
7.80
7.90
8.00
7.80
8.70
8.30
7.50
7.40
7.50
7.20
7.10
MG/L MG/L
88 0.070
88 0.060
89 0.060
89 . 0.060
91 0.120
94 0.140
118 0.250
130 0.280
134 0.130
136 0.270
141 0.430
HG/L
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
1.200
0.600
0.700
0.600
0.900
0.500
0.800
MG/L
1.400
1.400
1.400
1.400
0.560
0.680
1.100
1.200
0.670
0.780
0.920
MG/L P
0.059
0.058
0.059
0.059
• ••09
~"
0.012
0.021
0.035
0.010
0*020
0.032
-------
STOrtET HETRIEVAL OATE 75/01/37
420102
41 01 Ob.O 077 39 59.0
tJLANCHARb HESEWVOIR
42027 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/13
73/07/24
73/10/02
DATE
FrtOM
TO
73/04/13
73/0 f/24
7J/U/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 50 0000
11 50 OOOB
11 50 0015
12 10 0000
12 10 0005
12 10 0012
12 10 0017
14 05 0000
14 05 0010
TIME DEPTH
OF
OAT FEET
11 50 0000
11 50 0000
11 50 001S
12 10 0000
12 10 0005
12 10 1)012
12 10 i)017
14 OS 0000
Lt 05 0010
0001U
MATER
TtMP
CENT
8.2
8.2
8.2
26.4
26.1
25. 2
22.2
17.6
16.6
00 665
PMOS-TOT
MG/L P
ti.Obfl
0.06H
0.066
0.038
0.060
O.Obfe
0,lb6
0.3S7
0.261
00300
DO
MG/L
11.6
11.6
12.8
10.0
8.7
8.5
8.6
9.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
1.9
10.7
76.2
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES HICHOMHO
24 220
230
220
50 266
268
288
355
28 318
328
11EPALE5
3
00400 00410
PH T ALK
SU
7.70
8.00
7.80
8.90
a. BO
8.60
8.20
8.10
7.90
CAC03
MG/L
75
75
75
86
90
102
138
143
153
2111202
0019 FEET DEPTH
U0610 00625 00630
NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.080
0.090
0.130
0.120
0.130
0.090
N N-TOTAU
MG/L
0.200
0.200
U.200K
0.900
0.600
0.700
0.600
2.200
0.400
MG/L
1.200
1.200
1.200
0.500
0.510
0.620
2.100
1.320
2.280
00671
PHOS-UtS
ORTriO
MG/L P
0.064
0.065
0.064
0.009
0.012
0.013
0.105
0.105
0.228
K VALUE KNOWN TO b£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
420103
40 56 50.0 077 42 20.0
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
42027 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/04/13
73/07/24
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 12 0000
12 12 0004'
12 50 0000
12 50 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
7.8
7.7
26.5
26.1
00300 00077 00094
00 TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
11. 8
13.1
12.7
44
270
280
277
281
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
7.00
7.60
9.00
8.90
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
90
91
94
94
2U1202
0008 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.060
0.070
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200K
0.400
1.000
0.900
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.400
1.400
0.520
0.540
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTMO
MG/L P
0.071
0.070
0.012
0.012
DATE TIME DEPTH
FrtOM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/04/13 12 12 0000
12 12 0004
73/07/24 12 50 0000
12 SO 0005
0665
S-TUT
i/L P
u.071
0.074
0.055
0.073
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
1.3
12.0
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOKtT RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4201A1
41 03 29.0 077 35 46.0
HALO EAGLE CREEK
42079 7.5 BtECH CREEK
0/rtLANCHAKD RES
BANK 100 M UP FROM bRDG .2 NW EAGLEVILL
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/0:>/i9
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/12
73/09/09
73/10/14
73/11/11
73/12/16
74/01/06
74/02/10
74/02/23
74/03/10
74/03/23
74/Ot/07
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF ixl-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
10
09
09
10
12
10
09
10
09
11
11
08
10
09
15
45
30
OS
45
00
15
05
00
30
00
45
45
15
15
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
.930
.870
.990
.880
.640
.890
.300
.260
.340
.660
.900
.180
.800
.400
.ICO
MG/L
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
.400
.500
.600
.730
.750
.650
.575
.600
.300
.400
.700
.850
.500
.400
.800
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
060
130
132
160
170
037
136
056
026
020
020
070
030
030
050
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
a.
0.
0.
0.
p
008
031
030
030
014
025
060
068
044
070
075
045
190
045
040
MG/L P
0.055
0.045
0.105
0.075
0.045
0.045
0.105
0.090
0.070
0.090
0.125
0.193
0.240
0.095
0.045
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4201A2
40 56 35.0 077 47 14.0
BALO EAGLE CKEEK
42 /.;> BtLLEFOiMrE
T/rfLANChARD RES
rtQ 1*052 brtOG IN MlLESetURG
11EPALE.S 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/OB/12
73/09/09
73/10/1**
73/11/11
73/12/16
74/01/06
74/02/10
74/02/23
7<»/u3/lO
74/03/23
7^/04/07
00630 0062S
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
08
08
08
09
10
09
09
09
10
10
10
09
06
00
ob
20
05
40
45
05
40
00
15
15
55
00
IS
MG/L
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
3
(i
1
0
1
.040
.000
.960
.920
.300
.300
.200
.841)
.100
.000
.588
.400
.440
.920
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
320
850
BOO
100K
540
750
300
300
400
000
700
900
200
600
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-01S PMOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTttO
MG/L
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
066
052
061
046
066
075
028
044
064
055
040
105
010
065
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
120
115
115
150
198
250
252
140
132
19b
0.005
0.
0.
0.
070
015
105
MG/L t*
0.150
0.195
0.175
0.210
0.250
0.310
0.280
0.170
0.165
0.230
0.040
0.210
0.020
0.155
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET rtETRltVAL OATt 75/02/03
4201eU
41 00 50.0 077 39 06.0
LICK KUN
42 7.5 HOwAKD
T/HLANCHARL) RES
StC rtO BKUG IN HOWARD
11EPALES 21
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FHOM
TO
73/Ob/19
7j/06/ 10
73/0//15
73/Ud/12
73/09/09
73/10/1*
73/11/11
73/12/16
7^/01/06
7t/02/10
7**/u2/23
74/03/10
7^/03/23
74/04/07
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH Hi^tiN03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
08
09
08
10
11
Oa
08
09
09
10
11
09
09
45
50
05
45
25
40
45
45
15
00
45
30
30
00
MG/L
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
.HOG
MG/L
I.
zoo
,5<+0 2.900
.200
.500
.400
.200
.300
.430
.«00
• 030
.760
.950
.680
.360
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
960
150
210
750
150
400
300
100
550
300
200
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PhOS-DIS PhOS-TOT
TOTAL OKTrtO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
062
168
052
014
021
031
012
016
016
040
020
070
005
010
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
p
009
016
019
005K
013
023
012
016
012
010
005
025
010
015
MG/L P
0.015
0.030
0.080
O.Ulb
0.015
0.030
0.025
0.016
0.015
0.010
U.02b
0.0/0
0.015
0.025
UEPTM
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/02/03
4201C1
40 57 50.0 077 44 35.0
NITTANY CHEEK
42 7.5 MINGCWILLE
T/HLANCHAKU P-ES
US HWV 220 BROG .8 Ml NE OF I
lltPALES £111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/00/10
73/07/15
73/08/12
73/09/09
73/10/14
73/11/11
74/01/06
74/02/10
74/02/23
74/OJ/10
7W03/23
74/04/07
00630 0062S
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
OB
08
08
09
11
09
t>9
10
10
11
09
08
15
15
<*0
20
50
10
30
15
00
30
05
10
30
MG/L
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
.780
.000
.920
.94J
.940
.120
.100
.920
.000
.680
.440
.900
.200
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
227
100
940
540
210
850
100K
400
100
200
400
200
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PhGS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.021
.042
.030
.032
.039
.040
.012
.cue
.025
.030
.045
.005
.030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
005K
Oil
008
010
009
Oil
008
oub
005K
G05K
010
010
010
MG/L P
O.G10
0.040
0.055
0.010
0.020
0.011
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.015
0.060
0.020
0.025
80
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4201D1
40 59 20.0 077 42 50.0
BULL IT RUN
42 7.5 M1N6GVILLE
T/BLANCHAKD KES
US HWY 22U 6ROG
llEPALtS £111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/12
73/09/09
73/10/U
73/11/11
73/12/lb
74/01/06
74/02/10
74/02/23
74/03/10
74/t>3/23
74/04/07
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
08
08
06
10
11
09
u9
09
09
10
11
09
OS
30
30
55
35
10
25
30
20
25
45
35
15
20
45
MG/L
U.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Ot5
054
240
023
085
010K
044
176
160
116
200
132
092
o«a
MG/L
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.720
.840
.UOO
.540
.950
.400
.450
.200
.100i\
.300
.800
.900
.600
.600
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL UKTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
y
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.036
.052
.090
.297
.056
.037
.016
.020
.012
.022
.042
.130
.025
.030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
006
009
008
Oil
012
010
OOSK
012
OOti
OOSK
005K
010
005
010
MG/L P
0.015
C.020
0.022
0.015
0.015
u.010
0.005K
0.012
0.010
0.005K
0.025
0.045
o.oio
O.Olb
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORtT KETWlEtfAL DATd 7t>/02/03
4201AA P04201AA P002000
40 5b 09.0 077 48 28.0
bALL> EAGLE (WINGATt)
<»20 ?9 7.5 bELLEFONTE
T/bLANCHA«0 RESEKiVOlR
bALU tAGLE CKEEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/08/14
7J/09/10
73/11/16
73/12/17
7^/01/1-*
74/03/1-J
74/04/19
74/OS/lb
7t/Ut>/26
74/08/Lb
74/09/13
74/10/14
00630 0062S
TIME OE^TH N026.N03 TUT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
08
09
09
09
10
06
09
09
08
09
09
09
00
00
15
30
30
30
00
00
00
30
00
30
MG/L
U
0
a
^
7
1
u
0
0
0
2
0
.020
.168
.700
.500
, but)
.ibbO
.960
.320
.160
.040
.100
.300
M6/L
2.000
3.600
4.700
5.650
3.300
1.100
2.700
5.600
5.300
4.000
1.100
1.000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PrtOS-DlS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OUTHO
Mb/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.069
.270
.130
.011
.140
.120
.050
.038
.050
MG/L P
3.020
2.300
4.400
4.600
3.600
1.250
0.540
1.850
2.300
0.050
2.500
1.3oG
50051 50053
FLO* CONDUIT
HATE FLOW-MOD
MG/L P 1NST MGD MONTHLY
3. 700
2.800
b.100
4.9SO
4.200
1.400
0.930
2.600
2.800
2.700
2.600
1.600
0.010
0.015
0.019
0.018
0.015
0.019
0.013
0.013
0.012
0.012
0.017
0.014
0.012
0.014
0.018
0.015
0.017
0.014
0.013
0.015
0.035
0.01J
0.013
0.018
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4201XA AS4201XA P040000
40 S3 00.0 077 48 30.0
HA STATE UNIVERSITY
*2 250 HARRISdURG
T/bLANCHARU RESERVOIR
SPRING CREEK/BALD EAGLE CREEK
11EPALES 21*1204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/18
73/06/29
73/U7/31
73/08/31
73/09/27
73/10/31
73/1 1/3U
73/12/31
74/01/31
74/02/28
74/04/01
74/05/01
7^/05/31
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH rjU2&N03 TOT KJEL
OF U-TOTAL N
UAY FEET
08
08
OtJ
08
08
08
08
08
08
Ott
08
08
08
30
30
30
00
30
30
30
30
30
30
15
30
30
MG/L
15.
11.
13.
9.
11.
14.
14.
16.
15.
9.
10.
8.
000
OuO
400
100
000
OUO
600
000
000
600
100
600
MG/L
1.5*0
0.730
3.900
0.750
8.500
8.000
1.650
2.700
6.000
4.100
2.600
4.500
5.000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL URfHO
0.
J.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
'J.
0.
0.
L
300
490
210
043
101
210
180
600
650
520
25u
MG/L P
5.400
5.100
5.500
b.200
5.700
5.000
4. 700
5.500
6.2UO
5.200
b.OOO
4.800
50051 50053
FLU* CONDUIT
RATE FLOn-MGD
MG/L P iNST MGO MONTHLY
5.500
5.600
b,200
4.600
6.900
6.700
5.700
5.600
5.800
b.900
5.800
6.300
5.600
2.230
2.820
2.410
2.14U
3.530
t.090
2.520
1.080
3.490
3.500
3.010
3.560
2.340
2.800
2.710
2.390
2.370
3.160
3.480
3.470
2.530
2.990
3.350
2.810
3.320
3.070
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL OATE 7S/02/J3
42U1A6 TF4201XH P000700
40 52 33.0 07? <*f 30.0
bCl AT rtUCKVItW (tiELLtFONTE)
42 ?.5 BELLEFONTE
I/dLANCHAKL> RESEHVOIK
SPkiiMG CrtLEK/BALU EAbLE CREEK
HEPALES £141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/08/01
73/09/00
73/10/0^
73/10/31
73/12/03
74/01/02
74/02/21
74/0^/0 1
74/06/03
7
-------
bTORET RETRIEVAL OATE fS/02/03
4201AC AS4201XC P030000
40 4d 2S.O 077 50 15.0
SPRING CHEEK POLLUTION CONTROL
42 250 HAHHISBURG
T/dLANCHARD RESERVOIR
SPWINCj GREEK / BALD EAGLE CHEEK
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FCET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/07/31
CPU)-
73/08/01
73/OB/30
CH < T > -
7 3/0 B/ 30
73/09/37
CP1TI-
73/09/27
73/1U/31
CP-
74/02/2S
74/o3/aa
CPU)-
74/03/2H
74/04/30
CP1TI-
74/04/30
74/05/30
CP1TI-
74/05/30
74/06/27
CP < T 1 -
74/06/27
00630
TIME DEPTH N02HM03
OF N-TOTAL
IMY FEET MG/L
(10
24
00
24
00
24
00
24
00
24
00
24
UO
24
00
84
00
24
00
24
00
24
00
24
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
IB.bOO
1U.4UO
13.000
lb.200
13.000
ii.aoo
13.600
lb.000
8.500
15.000
17.600
0062S
TOT KJEL
H
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
5.
3.
11.
3.
5.
100*
220
SOOK
350
900
OOOK
500
600
OOU
800
100
00610 OObH 00665 500:31 50053
NH3-N PHOS-D1S PHOS-TOT FLOW COHUUIT
TOTAL ORTHO «AT£ FLO*-MGD
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
0.010
0.050
0.026
0.036
0.110
O.OSO
0.080
o.iao
o.oso
2.200
0.085
0.240
9.600
9.700
8. 025
7.100
a. 500
7.800
5.900
6.100
7.280
8.100
7.600
7.900
9
10
a
7
6
a
5
6
8
9
6
B
.800
.000
.450
.700
.525
.100
.900
.400
.100
.100
.600
.600
2.330
2.100
2.600
2.520
2.300
2.680
3.110
2.760
2.650
2.650
2.560
2.5t>0
2.280
2.160
2.580
2.760
2.600
2.640
2.960
2.870
2.7SO
3.140
2.660
2.510
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOWET RETRIEVAL DATE
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02*.N03
FROM OF N-10TAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
7H/07/31 00 00
CF-MT)-
74/07/31 24 00
2.700
4201XC AS^201XC P030000
40 na 25.0 077 50 15.0
bPrtlNb CUtEK POLLUTION CONTROL
42 250 HAKKlSttUKG
T/3LAHCHARD RESERVOIK
SPRING CKLEK / BALD EAtiLE
11EPALES
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
UObld
Nn3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PrIOS-OIS
OHTMO
MG/L P
00665
PrtOS-TOT
MG/L P
SOOil
FLOW
HATE
INSF MGU
50053
coNuuir
FLOw-MGD
MONTHLY
0.100
6.800
V.200
2.270
2.360
-------
STORE! KETK1EVAL DATE 75/02/03
4201ZA AS4201ZA P001200
40 44 00.0 077 53 03.0
PINE GROVE MILLS TREATMENT PLANT
t2 250/HARR1SBUKG
T/HLANCHAKU RESERVOIR
SLAtJ CABIN CREEK/SHU ING Ctt/BALD EAGLE CK
11EPALES 2141204
H 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/08/16
73/09/17
73/10/17
73/11/20
73/12/19
74/01/16
74/02/21
74/03/19
74/;)4/2o
74/05/20
74/06/20
74/07/17
74/06/26
00630
TIME OtPTH N02&N03
Of- N-TOTAL
UAY FEET MG/L
09
11
10
10
23
10
10
10
10
11
10
10
09
30
00
30
oc
00
45
CO
00
00
00
30
30
35
1H.
0.
15.
19.
26.
21.
8.
2U.
14.
13.
11.
3.
22.
000
05b
6uO
200
400
uOO
700
250
300
000
200
275
000
00625
TOT KJEL
MG/L
11.000
0.600
0.500K
2.400
4.700
5.400
6.000
2.200
1.700
2.500
l.COOK
fl.400
0061J 00671
NH3-N PHOS-DI5
TOTAL URTHO
MG/L MG/L H
u.l 70
0.118
0.130
0.120
1.240
1.350
l.BOO
0.190
0.110
0.090
O.OboK
D.250
12.400
10.950
14.700
13.800
11.200
10.600
9.700
9.350
8.600
8. 900
9.000
lu.OOO
11.000
00665 b0051 50053
PHOS-IOT FLOW CONDUIT
KATE FLOn-MGD
MG/L r1 INST MGU MONTHLY
11.000
15.150
14.250
11.500
10.600
10.000
10.630
10.000
9.500
9.300
11.000
13.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.022
.023
.023
.027
.029
.J35
.029
• 0 Jl
.041
.030
.027
.027
.023
0.023
0.024
0.023
0.024
0.024
0.028
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.035
0.025
0.027
0.02b
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |